Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
#align_import topology.shrinking_lemma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
variable {ι X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [NormalSpace X]
namespace ShrinkingLemma
-- the trivial refinement needs `u` to be a covering
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet. @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
@[ext] structure PartialRefinement (u : ι → Set X) (s : Set X) where
toFun : ι → Set X
carrier : Set ι
protected isOpen : ∀ i, IsOpen (toFun i)
subset_iUnion : s ⊆ ⋃ i, toFun i
closure_subset : ∀ {i}, i ∈ carrier → closure (toFun i) ⊆ u i
apply_eq : ∀ {i}, i ∉ carrier → toFun i = u i
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement
namespace PartialRefinement
variable {u : ι → Set X} {s : Set X}
instance : CoeFun (PartialRefinement u s) fun _ => ι → Set X := ⟨toFun⟩
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.subset_Union ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.subset_iUnion
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.closure_subset ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.closure_subset
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.apply_eq ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.apply_eq
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.is_open ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.isOpen
protected theorem subset (v : PartialRefinement u s) (i : ι) : v i ⊆ u i :=
if h : i ∈ v.carrier then subset_closure.trans (v.closure_subset h) else (v.apply_eq h).le
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.subset ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.subset
instance : PartialOrder (PartialRefinement u s) where
le v₁ v₂ := v₁.carrier ⊆ v₂.carrier ∧ ∀ i ∈ v₁.carrier, v₁ i = v₂ i
le_refl v := ⟨Subset.refl _, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
le_trans v₁ v₂ v₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans h₁₂.1 h₂₃.1, fun i hi => (h₁₂.2 i hi).trans (h₂₃.2 i <| h₁₂.1 hi)⟩
le_antisymm v₁ v₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ :=
have hc : v₁.carrier = v₂.carrier := Subset.antisymm h₁₂.1 h₂₁.1
PartialRefinement.ext _ _
(funext fun x =>
if hx : x ∈ v₁.carrier then h₁₂.2 _ hx
else (v₁.apply_eq hx).trans (Eq.symm <| v₂.apply_eq <| hc ▸ hx))
hc
theorem apply_eq_of_chain {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (hc : IsChain (· ≤ ·) c) {v₁ v₂}
(h₁ : v₁ ∈ c) (h₂ : v₂ ∈ c) {i} (hi₁ : i ∈ v₁.carrier) (hi₂ : i ∈ v₂.carrier) :
v₁ i = v₂ i :=
(hc.total h₁ h₂).elim (fun hle => hle.2 _ hi₁) (fun hle => (hle.2 _ hi₂).symm)
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.apply_eq_of_chain ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.apply_eq_of_chain
def chainSupCarrier (c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)) : Set ι :=
⋃ v ∈ c, carrier v
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.chain_Sup_carrier ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.chainSupCarrier
def find (c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)) (ne : c.Nonempty) (i : ι) : PartialRefinement u s :=
if hi : ∃ v ∈ c, i ∈ carrier v then hi.choose else ne.some
#align shrinking_lemma.partial_refinement.find ShrinkingLemma.PartialRefinement.find
| Mathlib/Topology/ShrinkingLemma.lean | 118 | 121 | theorem find_mem {c : Set (PartialRefinement u s)} (i : ι) (ne : c.Nonempty) : find c ne i ∈ c := by |
rw [find]
split_ifs with h
exacts [h.choose_spec.1, ne.some_mem]
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.BorelCantelli
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalExpectation
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Basic
#align_import probability.borel_cantelli from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f8347015b12b0864dfaf366ec4909eb70c78740"
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal Topology
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω} [IsProbabilityMeasure μ]
section BorelCantelli
variable {ι β : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [NormedAddCommGroup β]
[BorelSpace β] {f : ι → Ω → β} {i j : ι} {s : ι → Set Ω}
| Mathlib/Probability/BorelCantelli.lean | 43 | 48 | theorem iIndepFun.indep_comap_natural_of_lt (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i))
(hfi : iIndepFun (fun _ => mβ) f μ) (hij : i < j) :
Indep (MeasurableSpace.comap (f j) mβ) (Filtration.natural f hf i) μ := by |
suffices Indep (⨆ k ∈ ({j} : Set ι), MeasurableSpace.comap (f k) mβ)
(⨆ k ∈ {k | k ≤ i}, MeasurableSpace.comap (f k) mβ) μ by rwa [iSup_singleton] at this
exact indep_iSup_of_disjoint (fun k => (hf k).measurable.comap_le) hfi (by simpa)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
#align_import data.int.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
variable {R : Type*} [LinearOrderedSemifield R] [FloorSemiring R]
namespace Int
def log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ else -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊
#align int.log Int.log
theorem log_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : log b r = Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ :=
if_pos hr
#align int.log_of_one_le_right Int.log_of_one_le_right
theorem log_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : log b r = -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [log, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Nat.clog_one_right,
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
#align int.log_of_right_le_one Int.log_of_right_le_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem log_natCast (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : log b (n : R) = Nat.log b n := by
cases n
· simp [log_of_right_le_one]
· rw [log_of_one_le_right, Nat.floor_natCast]
simp
#align int.log_nat_cast Int.log_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem log_ofNat (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
log b (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R)) = Nat.log b (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
log_natCast b n
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (r : R) : log b r = 0 := by
rcases le_total 1 r with h | h
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h, Nat.log_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero]
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h, Nat.clog_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
#align int.log_of_left_le_one Int.log_of_left_le_one
theorem log_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : log b r = 0 := by
rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (hr.trans zero_le_one),
Nat.clog_of_right_le_one ((Nat.ceil_eq_zero.mpr <| inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans_le zero_le_one),
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
#align int.log_of_right_le_zero Int.log_of_right_le_zero
theorem zpow_log_le_self {b : ℕ} {r : R} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 < r) : (b : R) ^ log b r ≤ r := by
rcases le_total 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.le_floor_iff hr.le]
exact Nat.pow_log_le_self b (Nat.floor_pos.mpr hr1).ne'
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
exact inv_le_of_inv_le hr (Nat.ceil_le.1 <| Nat.le_pow_clog hb _)
#align int.zpow_log_le_self Int.zpow_log_le_self
theorem lt_zpow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (r : R) : r < (b : R) ^ (log b r + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· rw [log_of_right_le_zero _ hr, zero_add, zpow_one]
exact hr.trans_lt (zero_lt_one.trans_le <| mod_cast hb.le)
rcases le_or_lt 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [Int.ofNat_add_one_out, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
apply Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
exact Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1.le]
have hcri : 1 < r⁻¹ := one_lt_inv hr hr1
have : 1 ≤ Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ :=
Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.clog_pos hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le (Nat.le_ceil _))
rw [neg_add_eq_sub, ← neg_sub, ← Int.ofNat_one, ← Int.ofNat_sub this, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast,
lt_inv hr (pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| zero_lt_one.trans hb) _), ← Nat.cast_pow]
refine Nat.lt_ceil.1 ?_
exact Nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le <| Nat.le_ceil _
#align int.lt_zpow_succ_log_self Int.lt_zpow_succ_log_self
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b (0 : R) = 0 :=
log_of_right_le_zero b le_rfl
#align int.log_zero_right Int.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b (1 : R) = 0 := by
rw [log_of_one_le_right _ le_rfl, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero]
#align int.log_one_right Int.log_one_right
-- Porting note: needed to replace b ^ z with (b : R) ^ z in the below
theorem log_zpow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (z : ℤ) : log b ((b : R) ^ z : R) = z := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := Int.eq_nat_or_neg z
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ (one_le_zpow_of_nonneg _ <| Int.natCast_nonneg _), zpow_natCast, ←
Nat.cast_pow, Nat.floor_natCast, Nat.log_pow hb]
exact mod_cast hb.le
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (zpow_le_one_of_nonpos _ <| neg_nonpos.mpr (Int.natCast_nonneg _)),
zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.ceil_natCast, Nat.clog_pow _ _ hb]
exact mod_cast hb.le
#align int.log_zpow Int.log_zpow
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b : ℕ} {r₁ r₂ : R} (h₀ : 0 < r₁) (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : log b r₁ ≤ log b r₂ := by
rcases le_total r₁ 1 with h₁ | h₁ <;> rcases le_total r₂ 1 with h₂ | h₂
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_right_le_one _ h₂, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.clog_mono_right _ (Nat.ceil_mono <| inv_le_inv_of_le h₀ h)
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂]
exact (neg_nonpos.mpr (Int.natCast_nonneg _)).trans (Int.natCast_nonneg _)
· obtain rfl := le_antisymm h (h₂.trans h₁)
rfl
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.log_mono_right (Nat.floor_mono h)
#align int.log_mono_right Int.log_mono_right
variable (R)
def zpowLogGi {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) :
GaloisCoinsertion
(fun z : ℤ =>
Subtype.mk ((b : R) ^ z) <| zpow_pos_of_pos (mod_cast zero_lt_one.trans hb) z)
fun r : Set.Ioi (0 : R) => Int.log b (r : R) :=
GaloisCoinsertion.monotoneIntro (fun r₁ _ => log_mono_right r₁.2)
(fun _ _ hz => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| (zpow_strictMono <| mod_cast hb).monotone hz)
(fun r => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| zpow_log_le_self hb r.2) fun _ => log_zpow (R := R) hb _
#align int.zpow_log_gi Int.zpowLogGi
variable {R}
theorem lt_zpow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
r < (b : R) ^ x ↔ log b r < x :=
@GaloisConnection.lt_iff_lt _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
#align int.lt_zpow_iff_log_lt Int.lt_zpow_iff_log_lt
theorem zpow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
(b : R) ^ x ≤ r ↔ x ≤ log b r :=
@GaloisConnection.le_iff_le _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
#align int.zpow_le_iff_le_log Int.zpow_le_iff_le_log
def clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ else -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊
#align int.clog Int.clog
theorem clog_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : clog b r = Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ :=
if_pos hr
#align int.clog_of_one_le_right Int.clog_of_one_le_right
theorem clog_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : clog b r = -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [clog, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right,
Nat.clog_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
#align int.clog_of_right_le_one Int.clog_of_right_le_one
theorem clog_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : clog b r = 0 := by
rw [clog, if_neg (hr.trans_lt zero_lt_one).not_le, neg_eq_zero, Int.natCast_eq_zero,
Nat.log_eq_zero_iff]
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· exact Or.inr hb
· refine Or.inl (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hb)
exact Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one ((inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans zero_le_one)
#align int.clog_of_right_le_zero Int.clog_of_right_le_zero
@[simp]
theorem clog_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : clog b r⁻¹ = -log b r := by
cases' lt_or_le 0 r with hrp hrp
· obtain hr | hr := le_total 1 r
· rw [clog_of_right_le_one _ (inv_le_one hr), log_of_one_le_right _ hr, inv_inv]
· rw [clog_of_one_le_right _ (one_le_inv hrp hr), log_of_right_le_one _ hr, neg_neg]
· rw [clog_of_right_le_zero _ (inv_nonpos.mpr hrp), log_of_right_le_zero _ hrp, neg_zero]
#align int.clog_inv Int.clog_inv
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : log b r⁻¹ = -clog b r := by
rw [← inv_inv r, clog_inv, neg_neg, inv_inv]
#align int.log_inv Int.log_inv
-- note this is useful for writing in reverse
theorem neg_log_inv_eq_clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -log b r⁻¹ = clog b r := by rw [log_inv, neg_neg]
#align int.neg_log_inv_eq_clog Int.neg_log_inv_eq_clog
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Log.lean | 231 | 231 | theorem neg_clog_inv_eq_log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -clog b r⁻¹ = log b r := by | rw [clog_inv, neg_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.PhragmenLindelof
open Set Filter Function Complex Topology
namespace Complex
namespace HadamardThreeLines
def verticalStrip (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ) : Set ℂ := re ⁻¹' Ioo a b
def verticalClosedStrip (a : ℝ) (b : ℝ) : Set ℂ := re ⁻¹' Icc a b
noncomputable def sSupNormIm {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
(f : ℂ → E) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
sSup ((norm ∘ f) '' (re ⁻¹' {x}))
section invInterpStrip
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] (f : ℂ → E) (z : ℂ)
noncomputable def invInterpStrip (ε : ℝ) : ℂ :=
(ε + sSupNormIm f 0) ^ (z - 1) * (ε + sSupNormIm f 1) ^ (-z)
noncomputable def F (ε : ℝ) := fun z ↦ invInterpStrip f z ε • f z
lemma sSupNormIm_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ sSupNormIm f x := by
apply Real.sSup_nonneg
rintro y ⟨z1, _, hz2⟩
simp only [← hz2, comp, norm_nonneg]
lemma sSupNormIm_eps_pos {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) (x : ℝ) : 0 < ε + sSupNormIm f x := by
linarith [sSupNormIm_nonneg f x]
lemma abs_invInterpStrip {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) :
abs (invInterpStrip f z ε) =
(ε + sSupNormIm f 0) ^ (z.re - 1) * (ε + sSupNormIm f 1) ^ (-z.re) := by
simp only [invInterpStrip, map_mul]
repeat rw [← ofReal_add]
repeat rw [abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε _) _]
simp only [sub_re, one_re, neg_re]
lemma diffContOnCl_invInterpStrip {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε > 0) :
DiffContOnCl ℂ (fun z ↦ invInterpStrip f z ε) (verticalStrip 0 1) := by
apply Differentiable.diffContOnCl
apply Differentiable.mul
· apply Differentiable.const_cpow (Differentiable.sub_const (differentiable_id') 1) _
left
rw [← ofReal_add, ofReal_ne_zero]
simp only [ne_eq, ne_of_gt (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 0), not_false_eq_true]
· apply Differentiable.const_cpow (Differentiable.neg differentiable_id')
apply Or.inl
rw [← ofReal_add, ofReal_ne_zero]
exact (ne_of_gt (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1))
lemma norm_le_sSupNormIm (f : ℂ → E) (z : ℂ) (hD : z ∈ verticalClosedStrip 0 1)
(hB : BddAbove ((norm ∘ f) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1))) :
‖f z‖ ≤ sSupNormIm f (z.re) := by
refine le_csSup ?_ ?_
· apply BddAbove.mono (image_subset (norm ∘ f) _) hB
exact preimage_mono (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hD)
· apply mem_image_of_mem (norm ∘ f)
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_singleton]
lemma norm_lt_sSupNormIm_eps (f : ℂ → E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0) (z : ℂ)
(hD : z ∈ verticalClosedStrip 0 1) (hB : BddAbove ((norm ∘ f) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1))) :
‖f z‖ < ε + sSupNormIm f (z.re) :=
lt_add_of_pos_of_le hε (norm_le_sSupNormIm f z hD hB)
lemma F_BddAbove (f : ℂ → E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0)
(hB : BddAbove ((norm ∘ f) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1))) :
BddAbove ((norm ∘ (F f ε)) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1)) := by
-- Rewriting goal
simp only [F, image_congr, comp_apply, map_mul, invInterpStrip]
rw [bddAbove_def] at *
rcases hB with ⟨B, hB⟩
-- Using bound
use ((max 1 ((ε + sSupNormIm f 0) ^ (-(1 : ℝ)))) * max 1 ((ε + sSupNormIm f 1) ^ (-(1 : ℝ)))) * B
simp only [mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intros z hset
specialize hB (‖f z‖) (by simpa [image_congr, mem_image, comp_apply] using ⟨z, hset, rfl⟩)
-- Proof that the bound is correct
simp only [norm_smul, norm_mul, ← ofReal_add]
gcongr
-- Bounding individual terms
· by_cases hM0_one : 1 ≤ ε + sSupNormIm f 0
-- `1 ≤ (sSupNormIm f 0)`
· apply le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 0), sub_re,
one_re, Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hM0_one (sub_nonpos.mpr hset.2)]
-- `0 < (sSupNormIm f 0) < 1`
· rw [not_le] at hM0_one; apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _)
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 0), sub_re,
one_re]
apply Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 0) (le_of_lt hM0_one) _
simp only [neg_le_sub_iff_le_add, le_add_iff_nonneg_left, hset.1]
· by_cases hM1_one : 1 ≤ ε + sSupNormIm f 1
-- `1 ≤ sSupNormIm f 1`
· apply le_trans _ (le_max_left _ _)
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1), sub_re,
one_re, neg_re, Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos
hM1_one (Right.neg_nonpos_iff.mpr hset.1)]
-- `0 < sSupNormIm f 1 < 1`
· rw [not_le] at hM1_one; apply le_trans _ (le_max_right _ _)
simp only [norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1), sub_re,
one_re, neg_re, Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1)
(le_of_lt hM1_one) (neg_le_neg_iff.mpr hset.2)]
lemma F_edge_le_one (f : ℂ → E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : ε > 0) (z : ℂ)
(hB : BddAbove ((norm ∘ f) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1))) (hz : z ∈ re ⁻¹' {0, 1}) :
‖F f ε z‖ ≤ 1 := by
simp only [F, norm_smul, norm_eq_abs, map_mul, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos,
abs_invInterpStrip f z hε, sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1,
sub_re, one_re, neg_re]
rcases hz with hz0 | hz1
-- `z.re = 0`
· simp only [hz0, zero_sub, Real.rpow_neg_one, neg_zero, Real.rpow_zero, mul_one,
inv_mul_le_iff (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 0)]
rw [← hz0]
apply le_of_lt (norm_lt_sSupNormIm_eps f ε hε _ _ hB)
simp only [verticalClosedStrip, mem_preimage, zero_le_one, left_mem_Icc, hz0]
-- `z.re = 1`
· rw [mem_singleton_iff] at hz1
simp only [hz1, one_mul, Real.rpow_zero, sub_self, Real.rpow_neg_one,
inv_mul_le_iff (sSupNormIm_eps_pos f hε 1), mul_one]
rw [← hz1]
apply le_of_lt (norm_lt_sSupNormIm_eps f ε hε _ _ hB)
simp only [verticalClosedStrip, mem_preimage, zero_le_one, hz1, right_mem_Icc]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Hadamard.lean | 202 | 224 | theorem norm_mul_invInterpStrip_le_one_of_mem_verticalClosedStrip (f : ℂ → E) (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε)
(z : ℂ) (hd : DiffContOnCl ℂ f (verticalStrip 0 1))
(hB : BddAbove ((norm ∘ f) '' (verticalClosedStrip 0 1))) (hz : z ∈ verticalClosedStrip 0 1) :
‖F f ε z‖ ≤ 1 := by |
apply PhragmenLindelof.vertical_strip
(DiffContOnCl.smul (diffContOnCl_invInterpStrip f hε) hd) _
(fun x hx ↦ F_edge_le_one f ε hε x hB (Or.inl hx))
(fun x hx ↦ F_edge_le_one f ε hε x hB (Or.inr hx)) hz.1 hz.2
use 0
rw [sub_zero, div_one]
refine ⟨ Real.pi_pos, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨BF, hBF⟩ := F_BddAbove f ε hε hB
simp only [comp_apply, mem_upperBounds, mem_image, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at hBF
use BF
rw [Asymptotics.isBigO_iff]
use 1
rw [eventually_inf_principal]
apply eventually_of_forall
intro x hx
norm_num
exact (hBF x ((preimage_mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) hx)).trans
((le_of_lt (lt_add_one BF)).trans (Real.add_one_le_exp BF))
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 901 | 908 | theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by |
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.chebyshev from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d774451114d6045faeb6751c396bea1eb9058946"
namespace Polynomial.Chebyshev
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `T` `U` `X`
open Polynomial
variable (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def T : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * T (n + 1) - T n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * T (-n) - T (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T Polynomial.Chebyshev.T
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induct (motive : ℤ → Prop)
(zero : motive 0)
(one : motive 1)
(add_two : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (↑n + 1) → motive ↑n → motive (↑n + 2))
(neg_add_one : ∀ (n : ℕ), motive (-↑n) → motive (-↑n + 1) → motive (-↑n - 1)) :
∀ (a : ℤ), motive a :=
T.induct Unit motive zero one add_two fun n hn hnm => by
simpa only [Int.negSucc_eq, neg_add] using neg_add_one n hn hnm
@[simp]
theorem T_add_two : ∀ n, T R (n + 2) = 2 * X * T R (n + 1) - T R n
| (k : ℕ) => T.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) T.eq_4 R k
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_add_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_add_two
theorem T_add_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_sub_two (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 2) = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem T_sub_one (n : ℤ) : T R (n - 1) = 2 * X * T R n - T R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem T_eq (n : ℤ) : T R n = 2 * X * T R (n - 1) - T R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) T_add_two R (n - 2)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_of_two_le Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq
@[simp]
theorem T_zero : T R 0 = 1 := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_zero Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_zero
@[simp]
theorem T_one : T R 1 = X := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_one Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_one
theorem T_neg_one : T R (-1) = X := (by ring : 2 * X * 1 - X = X)
theorem T_two : T R 2 = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
simpa [pow_two, mul_assoc] using T_add_two R 0
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_two
@[simp]
theorem T_neg (n : ℤ) : T R (-n) = T R n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => rfl
| one => show 2 * X * 1 - X = X; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_two R n
have h₂ := T_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X:R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 - h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := T_add_one R n
have h₂ := T_sub_one R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) (2 * (X:R[X])) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ - h₂
theorem T_natAbs (n : ℤ) : T R n.natAbs = T R n := by
obtain h | h := Int.natAbs_eq n <;> nth_rw 2 [h]; simp
theorem T_neg_two : T R (-2) = 2 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by simp [T_two]
-- Well-founded definitions are now irreducible by default;
-- as this was implemented before this change,
-- we just set it back to semireducible to avoid needing to change any proofs.
@[semireducible] noncomputable def U : ℤ → R[X]
| 0 => 1
| 1 => 2 * X
| (n : ℕ) + 2 => 2 * X * U (n + 1) - U n
| -((n : ℕ) + 1) => 2 * X * U (-n) - U (-n + 1)
termination_by n => Int.natAbs n + Int.natAbs (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U Polynomial.Chebyshev.U
@[simp]
theorem U_add_two : ∀ n, U R (n + 2) = 2 * X * U R (n + 1) - U R n
| (k : ℕ) => U.eq_3 R k
| -(k + 1 : ℕ) => by linear_combination (norm := (simp [Int.negSucc_eq]; ring_nf)) U.eq_4 R k
theorem U_add_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 2) = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R n := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
theorem U_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (n - 1) = 2 * X * U R n - U R (n + 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 1)
theorem U_eq (n : ℤ) : U R n = 2 * X * U R (n - 1) - U R (n - 2) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) U_add_two R (n - 2)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_of_two_le Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_eq
@[simp]
theorem U_zero : U R 0 = 1 := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_zero Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_zero
@[simp]
theorem U_one : U R 1 = 2 * X := rfl
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_one Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_one
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_one : U R (-1) = 0 := by simpa using U_sub_one R 0
theorem U_two : U R 2 = 4 * X ^ 2 - 1 := by
have := U_add_two R 0
simp only [zero_add, U_one, U_zero] at this
linear_combination this
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_two Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_two
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_two : U R (-2) = -1 := by
simpa [zero_sub, Int.reduceNeg, U_neg_one, mul_zero, U_zero] using U_sub_two R 0
theorem U_neg_sub_one (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 1) = -U R (n - 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_one R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n - 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_eq R n
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2 + h₁ + h₂
theorem U_neg (n : ℤ) : U R (-n) = -U R (n - 2) := by simpa [sub_sub] using U_neg_sub_one R (n - 1)
@[simp]
theorem U_neg_sub_two (n : ℤ) : U R (-n - 2) = -U R n := by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm] using U_neg R (n + 2)
theorem U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T (n : ℤ) : U R (n + 1) = X * U R n + T R (n + 1) := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp [two_mul]
| one => simp [U_two, T_two]; ring
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_two R (n + 1)
have h₂ := U_add_two R n
have h₃ := T_add_two R (n + 1)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) -h₃ - (X:R[X]) * h₂ + h₁ + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 - ih2
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := U_add_two R (-n - 1)
have h₂ := U_add_two R (-n)
have h₃ := T_add_two R (-n)
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) -h₃ + h₂ - (X:R[X]) * h₁ - ih2 + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1
#align polynomial.chebyshev.U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T
theorem T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U (n : ℤ) : T R n = U R n - X * U R (n - 1) := by
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) - U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R (n - 1)
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U
theorem T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U (n : ℤ) : T R (n + 2) = X * T R (n + 1) - (1 - X ^ 2) * U R n := by
have h₁ := U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R n
have h₂ := U_eq_X_mul_U_add_T R (n + 1)
have h₃ := U_add_two R n
linear_combination (norm := ring_nf) h₃ - h₂ + (X:R[X]) * h₁
#align polynomial.chebyshev.T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U
theorem one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T (n : ℤ) :
(1 - X ^ 2) * U R n = X * T R (n + 1) - T R (n + 2) := by
linear_combination T_eq_X_mul_T_sub_pol_U R n
#align polynomial.chebyshev.one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.one_sub_X_sq_mul_U_eq_pol_in_T
variable {R S}
@[simp]
theorem map_T (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) : map f (T R n) = T S n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [T_add_two, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X,
ih1, ih2];
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [T_sub_one, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X, ih1,
ih2];
#align polynomial.chebyshev.map_T Polynomial.Chebyshev.map_T
@[simp]
theorem map_U (f : R →+* S) (n : ℤ) : map f (U R n) = U S n := by
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one => simp
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [U_add_two, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X, ih1,
ih2];
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
simp_rw [U_sub_one, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ofNat, map_X, ih1,
ih2];
#align polynomial.chebyshev.map_U Polynomial.Chebyshev.map_U
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Chebyshev.lean | 266 | 284 | theorem T_derivative_eq_U (n : ℤ) : derivative (T R n) = n * U R (n - 1) := by |
induction n using Polynomial.Chebyshev.induct with
| zero => simp
| one =>
simp [T_two, U_one, derivative_sub, derivative_one, derivative_mul, derivative_X_pow, add_mul]
| add_two n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := congr_arg derivative (T_add_two R n)
have h₂ := U_sub_one R n
have h₃ := T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U R (n + 1)
simp only [derivative_sub, derivative_mul, derivative_ofNat, derivative_X] at h₁
linear_combination (norm := (push_cast; ring_nf))
h₁ - ih2 + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 + 2 * h₃ - n * h₂
| neg_add_one n ih1 ih2 =>
have h₁ := congr_arg derivative (T_sub_one R (-n))
have h₂ := U_sub_two R (-n)
have h₃ := T_eq_U_sub_X_mul_U R (-n)
simp only [derivative_sub, derivative_mul, derivative_ofNat, derivative_X] at h₁
linear_combination (norm := (push_cast; ring_nf))
-ih2 + 2 * (X:R[X]) * ih1 + h₁ + 2 * h₃ + (n + 1) * h₂
|
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Dedup
#align_import data.multiset.finset_ops from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c227d107bbada5d0d9d20287e3282c0a7f1651a0"
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α}
def ndinsert (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (l.insert a : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.insert a)
#align multiset.ndinsert Multiset.ndinsert
@[simp]
theorem coe_ndinsert (a : α) (l : List α) : ndinsert a l = (insert a l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_ndinsert Multiset.coe_ndinsert
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem ndinsert_zero (a : α) : ndinsert a 0 = {a} :=
rfl
#align multiset.ndinsert_zero Multiset.ndinsert_zero
@[simp]
theorem ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s → ndinsert a s = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ h => congr_arg ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) <| insert_of_mem h
#align multiset.ndinsert_of_mem Multiset.ndinsert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∉ s → ndinsert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ h => congr_arg ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) <| insert_of_not_mem h
#align multiset.ndinsert_of_not_mem Multiset.ndinsert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_ndinsert {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ ndinsert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_insert_iff
#align multiset.mem_ndinsert Multiset.mem_ndinsert
@[simp]
theorem le_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : s ≤ ndinsert a s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => (sublist_insert _ _).subperm
#align multiset.le_ndinsert_self Multiset.le_ndinsert_self
-- Porting note: removing @[simp], simp can prove it
theorem mem_ndinsert_self (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : a ∈ ndinsert a s :=
mem_ndinsert.2 (Or.inl rfl)
#align multiset.mem_ndinsert_self Multiset.mem_ndinsert_self
theorem mem_ndinsert_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ ndinsert b s :=
mem_ndinsert.2 (Or.inr h)
#align multiset.mem_ndinsert_of_mem Multiset.mem_ndinsert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem length_ndinsert_of_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∈ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s := by simp [h]
#align multiset.length_ndinsert_of_mem Multiset.length_ndinsert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem length_ndinsert_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (h : a ∉ s) :
card (ndinsert a s) = card s + 1 := by simp [h]
#align multiset.length_ndinsert_of_not_mem Multiset.length_ndinsert_of_not_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/FinsetOps.lean | 83 | 84 | theorem dedup_cons {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : dedup (a ::ₘ s) = ndinsert a (dedup s) := by |
by_cases h : a ∈ s <;> simp [h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
#align_import group_theory.subsemigroup.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"feb99064803fd3108e37c18b0f77d0a8344677a3"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
-- Only needed for notation
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {A : Type*}
section NonAssoc
variable [Mul M] {s : Set M}
variable [Add A] {t : Set A}
class MulMemClass (S : Type*) (M : Type*) [Mul M] [SetLike S M] : Prop where
mul_mem : ∀ {s : S} {a b : M}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a * b ∈ s
#align mul_mem_class MulMemClass
export MulMemClass (mul_mem)
class AddMemClass (S : Type*) (M : Type*) [Add M] [SetLike S M] : Prop where
add_mem : ∀ {s : S} {a b : M}, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a + b ∈ s
#align add_mem_class AddMemClass
export AddMemClass (add_mem)
attribute [to_additive] MulMemClass
attribute [aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])] mul_mem add_mem
structure Subsemigroup (M : Type*) [Mul M] where
carrier : Set M
mul_mem' {a b} : a ∈ carrier → b ∈ carrier → a * b ∈ carrier
#align subsemigroup Subsemigroup
structure AddSubsemigroup (M : Type*) [Add M] where
carrier : Set M
add_mem' {a b} : a ∈ carrier → b ∈ carrier → a + b ∈ carrier
#align add_subsemigroup AddSubsemigroup
attribute [to_additive AddSubsemigroup] Subsemigroup
namespace Subsemigroup
@[to_additive]
instance : SetLike (Subsemigroup M) M :=
⟨Subsemigroup.carrier, fun p q h => by cases p; cases q; congr⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : MulMemClass (Subsemigroup M) M where mul_mem := fun {_ _ _} => Subsemigroup.mul_mem' _
initialize_simps_projections Subsemigroup (carrier → coe)
initialize_simps_projections AddSubsemigroup (carrier → coe)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_carrier {s : Subsemigroup M} {x : M} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemigroup.mem_carrier Subsemigroup.mem_carrier
#align add_subsemigroup.mem_carrier AddSubsemigroup.mem_carrier
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mk {s : Set M} {x : M} (h_mul) : x ∈ mk s h_mul ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemigroup.mem_mk Subsemigroup.mem_mk
#align add_subsemigroup.mem_mk AddSubsemigroup.mem_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_set_mk {s : Set M} (h_mul) : (mk s h_mul : Set M) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_set_mk Subsemigroup.coe_set_mk
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_set_mk AddSubsemigroup.coe_set_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mk_le_mk {s t : Set M} (h_mul) (h_mul') : mk s h_mul ≤ mk t h_mul' ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemigroup.mk_le_mk Subsemigroup.mk_le_mk
#align add_subsemigroup.mk_le_mk AddSubsemigroup.mk_le_mk
@[to_additive (attr := ext) "Two `AddSubsemigroup`s are equal if they have the same elements."]
theorem ext {S T : Subsemigroup M} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align subsemigroup.ext Subsemigroup.ext
#align add_subsemigroup.ext AddSubsemigroup.ext
@[to_additive "Copy an additive subsemigroup replacing `carrier` with a set that is equal to it."]
protected def copy (S : Subsemigroup M) (s : Set M) (hs : s = S) :
Subsemigroup M where
carrier := s
mul_mem' := hs.symm ▸ S.mul_mem'
#align subsemigroup.copy Subsemigroup.copy
#align add_subsemigroup.copy AddSubsemigroup.copy
variable {S : Subsemigroup M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_copy {s : Set M} (hs : s = S) : (S.copy s hs : Set M) = s :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_copy Subsemigroup.coe_copy
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_copy AddSubsemigroup.coe_copy
@[to_additive]
theorem copy_eq {s : Set M} (hs : s = S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align subsemigroup.copy_eq Subsemigroup.copy_eq
#align add_subsemigroup.copy_eq AddSubsemigroup.copy_eq
variable (S)
@[to_additive "An `AddSubsemigroup` is closed under addition."]
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : M} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x * y ∈ S :=
Subsemigroup.mul_mem' S
#align subsemigroup.mul_mem Subsemigroup.mul_mem
#align add_subsemigroup.add_mem AddSubsemigroup.add_mem
@[to_additive "The additive subsemigroup `M` of the magma `M`."]
instance : Top (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨{ carrier := Set.univ
mul_mem' := fun _ _ => Set.mem_univ _ }⟩
@[to_additive "The trivial `AddSubsemigroup` `∅` of an additive magma `M`."]
instance : Bot (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨{ carrier := ∅
mul_mem' := False.elim }⟩
@[to_additive]
instance : Inhabited (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem not_mem_bot {x : M} : x ∉ (⊥ : Subsemigroup M) :=
Set.not_mem_empty x
#align subsemigroup.not_mem_bot Subsemigroup.not_mem_bot
#align add_subsemigroup.not_mem_bot AddSubsemigroup.not_mem_bot
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_top (x : M) : x ∈ (⊤ : Subsemigroup M) :=
Set.mem_univ x
#align subsemigroup.mem_top Subsemigroup.mem_top
#align add_subsemigroup.mem_top AddSubsemigroup.mem_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_top Subsemigroup.coe_top
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_top AddSubsemigroup.coe_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_bot Subsemigroup.coe_bot
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_bot AddSubsemigroup.coe_bot
@[to_additive "The inf of two `AddSubsemigroup`s is their intersection."]
instance : Inf (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨fun S₁ S₂ =>
{ carrier := S₁ ∩ S₂
mul_mem' := fun ⟨hx, hx'⟩ ⟨hy, hy'⟩ => ⟨S₁.mul_mem hx hy, S₂.mul_mem hx' hy'⟩ }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_inf (p p' : Subsemigroup M) : ((p ⊓ p' : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = (p : Set M) ∩ p' :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_inf Subsemigroup.coe_inf
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_inf AddSubsemigroup.coe_inf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_inf {p p' : Subsemigroup M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ p' ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ p' :=
Iff.rfl
#align subsemigroup.mem_inf Subsemigroup.mem_inf
#align add_subsemigroup.mem_inf AddSubsemigroup.mem_inf
@[to_additive]
instance : InfSet (Subsemigroup M) :=
⟨fun s =>
{ carrier := ⋂ t ∈ s, ↑t
mul_mem' := fun hx hy =>
Set.mem_biInter fun i h =>
i.mul_mem (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hx i h) (by apply Set.mem_iInter₂.1 hy i h) }⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (Subsemigroup M)) : ((sInf S : Subsemigroup M) : Set M) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align subsemigroup.coe_Inf Subsemigroup.coe_sInf
#align add_subsemigroup.coe_Inf AddSubsemigroup.coe_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Subsemigroup M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align subsemigroup.mem_Inf Subsemigroup.mem_sInf
#align add_subsemigroup.mem_Inf AddSubsemigroup.mem_sInf
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Subsemigroup/Basic.lean | 254 | 255 | theorem mem_iInf {ι : Sort*} {S : ι → Subsemigroup M} {x : M} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, S i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ S i := by |
simp only [iInf, mem_sInf, Set.forall_mem_range]
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.Algebra.Monoid
#align_import geometry.manifold.algebra.lie_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f9ec187127cc5b381dfcf5f4a22dacca4c20b63d"
noncomputable section
open scoped Manifold
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
class LieAddGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothAdd I G : Prop where
smooth_neg : Smooth I I fun a : G => -a
#align lie_add_group LieAddGroup
-- See note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]
@[to_additive]
class LieGroup {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[Group G] [TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] extends SmoothMul I G : Prop where
smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun a : G => a⁻¹
#align lie_group LieGroup
section PointwiseDivision
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F F} {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Group G] [LieGroup I G] {E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H' M]
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H'' M']
{n : ℕ∞}
section
variable (I)
@[to_additive "In an additive Lie group, inversion is a smooth map."]
theorem smooth_inv : Smooth I I fun x : G => x⁻¹ :=
LieGroup.smooth_inv
#align smooth_inv smooth_inv
#align smooth_neg smooth_neg
@[to_additive "An additive Lie group is an additive topological group. This is not an instance for
technical reasons, see note [Design choices about smooth algebraic structures]."]
theorem topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup : TopologicalGroup G :=
{ continuousMul_of_smooth I with continuous_inv := (smooth_inv I).continuous }
#align topological_group_of_lie_group topologicalGroup_of_lieGroup
#align topological_add_group_of_lie_add_group topologicalAddGroup_of_lieAddGroup
end
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.contMDiffWithinAt.comp x₀ hf <| Set.mapsTo_univ _ _
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.inv ContMDiffWithinAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.neg ContMDiffWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀) :
ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
((smooth_inv I).of_le le_top).contMDiffAt.comp x₀ hf
#align cont_mdiff_at.inv ContMDiffAt.inv
#align cont_mdiff_at.neg ContMDiffAt.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : ContMDiffOn I' I n f s) :
ContMDiffOn I' I n (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s := fun x hx => (hf x hx).inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.inv ContMDiffOn.inv
#align cont_mdiff_on.neg ContMDiffOn.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiff.inv {f : M → G} (hf : ContMDiff I' I n f) : ContMDiff I' I n fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
fun x => (hf x).inv
#align cont_mdiff.inv ContMDiff.inv
#align cont_mdiff.neg ContMDiff.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothWithinAt.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : SmoothWithinAt I' I f s x₀) : SmoothWithinAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_within_at.inv SmoothWithinAt.inv
#align smooth_within_at.neg SmoothWithinAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothAt.inv {f : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : SmoothAt I' I f x₀) :
SmoothAt I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) x₀ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_at.inv SmoothAt.inv
#align smooth_at.neg SmoothAt.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem SmoothOn.inv {f : M → G} {s : Set M} (hf : SmoothOn I' I f s) :
SmoothOn I' I (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) s :=
hf.inv
#align smooth_on.inv SmoothOn.inv
#align smooth_on.neg SmoothOn.neg
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem Smooth.inv {f : M → G} (hf : Smooth I' I f) : Smooth I' I fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
hf.inv
#align smooth.inv Smooth.inv
#align smooth.neg Smooth.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.div {f g : M → G} {s : Set M} {x₀ : M}
(hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n f s x₀) (hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n g s x₀) :
ContMDiffWithinAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) s x₀ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.div ContMDiffWithinAt.div
#align cont_mdiff_within_at.sub ContMDiffWithinAt.sub
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LieGroup.lean | 179 | 181 | theorem ContMDiffAt.div {f g : M → G} {x₀ : M} (hf : ContMDiffAt I' I n f x₀)
(hg : ContMDiffAt I' I n g x₀) : ContMDiffAt I' I n (fun x => f x / g x) x₀ := by |
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]; exact hf.mul hg.inv
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
#align_import data.list.zip from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"134625f523e737f650a6ea7f0c82a6177e45e622"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u
open Nat
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β γ δ ε : Type*}
#align list.zip_with_cons_cons List.zipWith_cons_cons
#align list.zip_cons_cons List.zip_cons_cons
#align list.zip_with_nil_left List.zipWith_nil_left
#align list.zip_with_nil_right List.zipWith_nil_right
#align list.zip_with_eq_nil_iff List.zipWith_eq_nil_iff
#align list.zip_nil_left List.zip_nil_left
#align list.zip_nil_right List.zip_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem zip_swap : ∀ (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β), (zip l₁ l₂).map Prod.swap = zip l₂ l₁
| [], l₂ => zip_nil_right.symm
| l₁, [] => by rw [zip_nil_right]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂ => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, map_cons, zip_swap l₁ l₂, Prod.swap_prod_mk]
#align list.zip_swap List.zip_swap
#align list.length_zip_with List.length_zipWith
#align list.length_zip List.length_zip
theorem forall_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ = length l₂ →
(Forall p (zipWith f l₁ l₂) ↔ Forall₂ (fun x y => p (f x y)) l₁ l₂)
| [], [], _ => by simp
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [length_cons, succ_inj'] at h
simp [forall_zipWith h]
#align list.all₂_zip_with List.forall_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip_with List.lt_length_left_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_right_of_zipWith {f : α → β → γ} {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β}
(h : i < (zipWith f l l').length) : i < l'.length := by rw [length_zipWith] at h; omega
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip_with List.lt_length_right_of_zipWith
theorem lt_length_left_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l.length :=
lt_length_left_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_left_of_zip List.lt_length_left_of_zip
theorem lt_length_right_of_zip {i : ℕ} {l : List α} {l' : List β} (h : i < (zip l l').length) :
i < l'.length :=
lt_length_right_of_zipWith h
#align list.lt_length_right_of_zip List.lt_length_right_of_zip
#align list.zip_append List.zip_append
#align list.zip_map List.zip_map
#align list.zip_map_left List.zip_map_left
#align list.zip_map_right List.zip_map_right
#align list.zip_with_map List.zipWith_map
#align list.zip_with_map_left List.zipWith_map_left
#align list.zip_with_map_right List.zipWith_map_right
#align list.zip_map' List.zip_map'
#align list.map_zip_with List.map_zipWith
theorem mem_zip {a b} : ∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, (a, b) ∈ zip l₁ l₂ → a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂
| _ :: l₁, _ :: l₂, h => by
cases' h with _ _ _ h
· simp
· have := mem_zip h
exact ⟨Mem.tail _ this.1, Mem.tail _ this.2⟩
#align list.mem_zip List.mem_zip
#align list.map_fst_zip List.map_fst_zip
#align list.map_snd_zip List.map_snd_zip
#align list.unzip_nil List.unzip_nil
#align list.unzip_cons List.unzip_cons
theorem unzip_eq_map : ∀ l : List (α × β), unzip l = (l.map Prod.fst, l.map Prod.snd)
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, map_cons, unzip_eq_map l]
#align list.unzip_eq_map List.unzip_eq_map
theorem unzip_left (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).1 = l.map Prod.fst := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_left List.unzip_left
theorem unzip_right (l : List (α × β)) : (unzip l).2 = l.map Prod.snd := by simp only [unzip_eq_map]
#align list.unzip_right List.unzip_right
theorem unzip_swap (l : List (α × β)) : unzip (l.map Prod.swap) = (unzip l).swap := by
simp only [unzip_eq_map, map_map]
rfl
#align list.unzip_swap List.unzip_swap
theorem zip_unzip : ∀ l : List (α × β), zip (unzip l).1 (unzip l).2 = l
| [] => rfl
| (a, b) :: l => by simp only [unzip_cons, zip_cons_cons, zip_unzip l]
#align list.zip_unzip List.zip_unzip
theorem unzip_zip_left :
∀ {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β}, length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → (unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).1 = l₁
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| l₁, [], h => by rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h)]; rfl
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, h => by
simp only [zip_cons_cons, unzip_cons, unzip_zip_left (le_of_succ_le_succ h)]
#align list.unzip_zip_left List.unzip_zip_left
theorem unzip_zip_right {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) :
(unzip (zip l₁ l₂)).2 = l₂ := by rw [← zip_swap, unzip_swap]; exact unzip_zip_left h
#align list.unzip_zip_right List.unzip_zip_right
theorem unzip_zip {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} (h : length l₁ = length l₂) :
unzip (zip l₁ l₂) = (l₁, l₂) := by
rw [← Prod.mk.eta (p := unzip (zip l₁ l₂)),
unzip_zip_left (le_of_eq h), unzip_zip_right (ge_of_eq h)]
#align list.unzip_zip List.unzip_zip
theorem zip_of_prod {l : List α} {l' : List β} {lp : List (α × β)} (hl : lp.map Prod.fst = l)
(hr : lp.map Prod.snd = l') : lp = l.zip l' := by
rw [← hl, ← hr, ← zip_unzip lp, ← unzip_left, ← unzip_right, zip_unzip, zip_unzip]
#align list.zip_of_prod List.zip_of_prod
theorem map_prod_left_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
(l.map fun x => (x, f x)) = l.zip (l.map f) := by
rw [← zip_map']
congr
exact map_id _
#align list.map_prod_left_eq_zip List.map_prod_left_eq_zip
theorem map_prod_right_eq_zip {l : List α} (f : α → β) :
(l.map fun x => (f x, x)) = (l.map f).zip l := by
rw [← zip_map']
congr
exact map_id _
#align list.map_prod_right_eq_zip List.map_prod_right_eq_zip
theorem zipWith_comm (f : α → β → γ) :
∀ (la : List α) (lb : List β), zipWith f la lb = zipWith (fun b a => f a b) lb la
| [], _ => List.zipWith_nil_right.symm
| _ :: _, [] => rfl
| _ :: as, _ :: bs => congr_arg _ (zipWith_comm f as bs)
#align list.zip_with_comm List.zipWith_comm
@[congr]
theorem zipWith_congr (f g : α → β → γ) (la : List α) (lb : List β)
(h : List.Forall₂ (fun a b => f a b = g a b) la lb) : zipWith f la lb = zipWith g la lb := by
induction' h with a b as bs hfg _ ih
· rfl
· exact congr_arg₂ _ hfg ih
#align list.zip_with_congr List.zipWith_congr
| Mathlib/Data/List/Zip.lean | 177 | 180 | theorem zipWith_comm_of_comm (f : α → α → β) (comm : ∀ x y : α, f x y = f y x) (l l' : List α) :
zipWith f l l' = zipWith f l' l := by |
rw [zipWith_comm]
simp only [comm]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Hom
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Units
#align_import algebra.group_with_zero.units.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {α M₀ G₀ M₀' G₀' F F' : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [GroupWithZero G₀'] [FunLike F G₀ G₀']
[MonoidWithZeroHomClass F G₀ G₀'] (f : F) (a b : G₀)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Lemmas.lean | 64 | 68 | theorem map_inv₀ : f a⁻¹ = (f a)⁻¹ := by |
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp [h, map_zero f]
· apply eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
rw [← map_mul, inv_mul_cancel h, map_one]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Complex
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Jordan
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensityVectorMeasure
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ ν : MeasureTheory.Measure α}
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace SignedMeasure
open Measure
class HaveLebesgueDecomposition (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : Prop where
posPart : s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
negPart : s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition.pos_part MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition.posPart
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition.neg_part MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.HaveLebesgueDecomposition.negPart
attribute [instance] HaveLebesgueDecomposition.posPart
attribute [instance] HaveLebesgueDecomposition.negPart
theorem not_haveLebesgueDecomposition_iff (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) :
¬s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ↔
¬s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ ∨
¬s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ :=
⟨fun h => not_or_of_imp fun hp hn => h ⟨hp, hn⟩, fun h hl => (not_and_or.2 h) ⟨hl.1, hl.2⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.not_have_lebesgue_decomposition_iff MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.not_haveLebesgueDecomposition_iff
-- `inferInstance` directly does not work
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) haveLebesgueDecomposition_of_sigmaFinite (s : SignedMeasure α)
(μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ where
posPart := inferInstance
negPart := inferInstance
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_of_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.haveLebesgueDecomposition_of_sigmaFinite
instance haveLebesgueDecomposition_neg (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α)
[s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ] : (-s).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ where
posPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_neg, JordanDecomposition.neg_posPart]
infer_instance
negPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_neg, JordanDecomposition.neg_negPart]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_neg MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.haveLebesgueDecomposition_neg
instance haveLebesgueDecomposition_smul (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α)
[s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ] (r : ℝ≥0) : (r • s).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ where
posPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_smul, JordanDecomposition.smul_posPart]
infer_instance
negPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_smul, JordanDecomposition.smul_negPart]
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.haveLebesgueDecomposition_smul
instance haveLebesgueDecomposition_smul_real (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α)
[s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ] (r : ℝ) : (r • s).HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ := by
by_cases hr : 0 ≤ r
· lift r to ℝ≥0 using hr
exact s.haveLebesgueDecomposition_smul μ _
· rw [not_le] at hr
refine
{ posPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_smul_real, JordanDecomposition.real_smul_posPart_neg _ _ hr]
infer_instance
negPart := by
rw [toJordanDecomposition_smul_real, JordanDecomposition.real_smul_negPart_neg _ _ hr]
infer_instance }
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.have_lebesgue_decomposition_smul_real MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.haveLebesgueDecomposition_smul_real
def singularPart (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : SignedMeasure α :=
(s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.singularPart μ).toSignedMeasure -
(s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.singularPart μ).toSignedMeasure
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.singular_part MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.singularPart
section
theorem singularPart_mutuallySingular (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) :
s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.singularPart μ ⟂ₘ
s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.singularPart μ := by
by_cases hl : s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ
· obtain ⟨i, hi, hpos, hneg⟩ := s.toJordanDecomposition.mutuallySingular
rw [s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.haveLebesgueDecomposition_add μ] at hpos
rw [s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.haveLebesgueDecomposition_add μ] at hneg
rw [add_apply, add_eq_zero_iff] at hpos hneg
exact ⟨i, hi, hpos.1, hneg.1⟩
· rw [not_haveLebesgueDecomposition_iff] at hl
cases' hl with hp hn
· rw [Measure.singularPart, dif_neg hp]
exact MutuallySingular.zero_left
· rw [Measure.singularPart, Measure.singularPart, dif_neg hn]
exact MutuallySingular.zero_right
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.singular_part_mutually_singular MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.singularPart_mutuallySingular
theorem singularPart_totalVariation (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) :
(s.singularPart μ).totalVariation =
s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.singularPart μ +
s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.singularPart μ := by
have :
(s.singularPart μ).toJordanDecomposition =
⟨s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.singularPart μ,
s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.singularPart μ, singularPart_mutuallySingular s μ⟩ := by
refine JordanDecomposition.toSignedMeasure_injective ?_
rw [toSignedMeasure_toJordanDecomposition, singularPart, JordanDecomposition.toSignedMeasure]
rw [totalVariation, this]
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.singular_part_total_variation MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.singularPart_totalVariation
nonrec theorem mutuallySingular_singularPart (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) :
singularPart s μ ⟂ᵥ μ.toENNRealVectorMeasure := by
rw [mutuallySingular_ennreal_iff, singularPart_totalVariation,
VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure_toENNRealVectorMeasure]
exact (mutuallySingular_singularPart _ _).add_left (mutuallySingular_singularPart _ _)
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.mutually_singular_singular_part MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.mutuallySingular_singularPart
end
def rnDeriv (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : α → ℝ := fun x =>
(s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.rnDeriv μ x).toReal -
(s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.rnDeriv μ x).toReal
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.rn_deriv MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.rnDeriv
-- The generated equation theorem is the form of `rnDeriv s μ x = ...`.
theorem rnDeriv_def (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : rnDeriv s μ = fun x =>
(s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.rnDeriv μ x).toReal -
(s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.rnDeriv μ x).toReal :=
rfl
variable {s t : SignedMeasure α}
@[measurability]
theorem measurable_rnDeriv (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : Measurable (rnDeriv s μ) := by
rw [rnDeriv_def]
measurability
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.measurable_rn_deriv MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv
theorem integrable_rnDeriv (s : SignedMeasure α) (μ : Measure α) : Integrable (rnDeriv s μ) μ := by
refine Integrable.sub ?_ ?_ <;>
· constructor
· apply Measurable.aestronglyMeasurable; measurability
exact hasFiniteIntegral_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top (lintegral_rnDeriv_lt_top _ μ).ne
#align measure_theory.signed_measure.integrable_rn_deriv MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv
variable (s μ)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Decomposition/SignedLebesgue.lean | 209 | 229 | theorem singularPart_add_withDensity_rnDeriv_eq [s.HaveLebesgueDecomposition μ] :
s.singularPart μ + μ.withDensityᵥ (s.rnDeriv μ) = s := by |
conv_rhs =>
rw [← toSignedMeasure_toJordanDecomposition s, JordanDecomposition.toSignedMeasure]
rw [singularPart, rnDeriv_def,
withDensityᵥ_sub' (integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top _ _)
(integrable_toReal_of_lintegral_ne_top _ _),
withDensityᵥ_toReal, withDensityᵥ_toReal, sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg,
add_comm (s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.singularPart μ).toSignedMeasure, ← add_assoc,
add_assoc (-(s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.singularPart μ).toSignedMeasure),
← toSignedMeasure_add, add_comm, ← add_assoc, ← neg_add, ← toSignedMeasure_add, add_comm,
← sub_eq_add_neg]
· convert rfl
-- `convert rfl` much faster than `congr`
· exact s.toJordanDecomposition.posPart.haveLebesgueDecomposition_add μ
· rw [add_comm]
exact s.toJordanDecomposition.negPart.haveLebesgueDecomposition_add μ
all_goals
first
| exact (lintegral_rnDeriv_lt_top _ _).ne
| measurability
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Nonempty
import Mathlib.Init.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
#align_import logic.function.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"29cb56a7b35f72758b05a30490e1f10bd62c35c1"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace Function
section
variable {α β γ : Sort*} {f : α → β}
@[reducible, simp] def eval {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : β x := f x
#align function.eval Function.eval
theorem eval_apply {β : α → Sort*} (x : α) (f : ∀ x, β x) : eval x f = f x :=
rfl
#align function.eval_apply Function.eval_apply
theorem const_def {y : β} : (fun _ : α ↦ y) = const α y :=
rfl
#align function.const_def Function.const_def
theorem const_injective [Nonempty α] : Injective (const α : β → α → β) := fun y₁ y₂ h ↦
let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›
congr_fun h x
#align function.const_injective Function.const_injective
@[simp]
theorem const_inj [Nonempty α] {y₁ y₂ : β} : const α y₁ = const α y₂ ↔ y₁ = y₂ :=
⟨fun h ↦ const_injective h, fun h ↦ h ▸ rfl⟩
#align function.const_inj Function.const_inj
#align function.id_def Function.id_def
-- Porting note: `Function.onFun` is now reducible
-- @[simp]
theorem onFun_apply (f : β → β → γ) (g : α → β) (a b : α) : onFun f g a b = f (g a) (g b) :=
rfl
#align function.on_fun_apply Function.onFun_apply
lemma hfunext {α α' : Sort u} {β : α → Sort v} {β' : α' → Sort v} {f : ∀a, β a} {f' : ∀a, β' a}
(hα : α = α') (h : ∀a a', HEq a a' → HEq (f a) (f' a')) : HEq f f' := by
subst hα
have : ∀a, HEq (f a) (f' a) := fun a ↦ h a a (HEq.refl a)
have : β = β' := by funext a; exact type_eq_of_heq (this a)
subst this
apply heq_of_eq
funext a
exact eq_of_heq (this a)
#align function.hfunext Function.hfunext
#align function.funext_iff Function.funext_iff
theorem ne_iff {β : α → Sort*} {f₁ f₂ : ∀ a, β a} : f₁ ≠ f₂ ↔ ∃ a, f₁ a ≠ f₂ a :=
funext_iff.not.trans not_forall
#align function.ne_iff Function.ne_iff
lemma funext_iff_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] {g : α → β} (x y : α) :
f x = g y ↔ f = g := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ funext fun z ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rwa [Subsingleton.elim x z, Subsingleton.elim y z] at h
· rw [h, Subsingleton.elim x y]
protected theorem Bijective.injective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Injective f := hf.1
#align function.bijective.injective Function.Bijective.injective
protected theorem Bijective.surjective {f : α → β} (hf : Bijective f) : Surjective f := hf.2
#align function.bijective.surjective Function.Bijective.surjective
theorem Injective.eq_iff (I : Injective f) {a b : α} : f a = f b ↔ a = b :=
⟨@I _ _, congr_arg f⟩
#align function.injective.eq_iff Function.Injective.eq_iff
theorem Injective.beq_eq {α β : Type*} [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] [BEq β] [LawfulBEq β] {f : α → β}
(I : Injective f) {a b : α} : (f a == f b) = (a == b) := by
by_cases h : a == b <;> simp [h] <;> simpa [I.eq_iff] using h
theorem Injective.eq_iff' (I : Injective f) {a b : α} {c : β} (h : f b = c) : f a = c ↔ a = b :=
h ▸ I.eq_iff
#align function.injective.eq_iff' Function.Injective.eq_iff'
theorem Injective.ne (hf : Injective f) {a₁ a₂ : α} : a₁ ≠ a₂ → f a₁ ≠ f a₂ :=
mt fun h ↦ hf h
#align function.injective.ne Function.Injective.ne
theorem Injective.ne_iff (hf : Injective f) {x y : α} : f x ≠ f y ↔ x ≠ y :=
⟨mt <| congr_arg f, hf.ne⟩
#align function.injective.ne_iff Function.Injective.ne_iff
theorem Injective.ne_iff' (hf : Injective f) {x y : α} {z : β} (h : f y = z) : f x ≠ z ↔ x ≠ y :=
h ▸ hf.ne_iff
#align function.injective.ne_iff' Function.Injective.ne_iff'
theorem not_injective_iff : ¬ Injective f ↔ ∃ a b, f a = f b ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp only [Injective, not_forall, exists_prop]
protected def Injective.decidableEq [DecidableEq β] (I : Injective f) : DecidableEq α :=
fun _ _ ↦ decidable_of_iff _ I.eq_iff
#align function.injective.decidable_eq Function.Injective.decidableEq
theorem Injective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Injective g :=
fun _ _ h ↦ I <| congr_arg f h
#align function.injective.of_comp Function.Injective.of_comp
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff (hf : Injective f) (g : γ → α) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective g :=
⟨Injective.of_comp, hf.comp⟩
#align function.injective.of_comp_iff Function.Injective.of_comp_iff
theorem Injective.of_comp_right {g : γ → α} (I : Injective (f ∘ g)) (hg : Surjective g) :
Injective f := fun x y h ↦ by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := hg x
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := hg y
exact congr_arg g (I h)
theorem Surjective.bijective₂_of_injective {g : γ → α} (hf : Surjective f) (hg : Surjective g)
(I : Injective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨I.of_comp_right hg, hf⟩, I.of_comp, hg⟩
@[simp]
theorem Injective.of_comp_iff' (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Bijective g) :
Injective (f ∘ g) ↔ Injective f :=
⟨fun I ↦ I.of_comp_right hg.2, fun h ↦ h.comp hg.injective⟩
#align function.injective.of_comp_iff' Function.Injective.of_comp_iff'
theorem Injective.comp_left {g : β → γ} (hg : Function.Injective g) :
Function.Injective (g ∘ · : (α → β) → α → γ) :=
fun _ _ hgf ↦ funext fun i ↦ hg <| (congr_fun hgf i : _)
#align function.injective.comp_left Function.Injective.comp_left
theorem injective_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : Injective f :=
fun _ _ _ ↦ Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align function.injective_of_subsingleton Function.injective_of_subsingleton
lemma Injective.dite (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
{f : {a : α // p a} → β} {f' : {a : α // ¬ p a} → β}
(hf : Injective f) (hf' : Injective f')
(im_disj : ∀ {x x' : α} {hx : p x} {hx' : ¬ p x'}, f ⟨x, hx⟩ ≠ f' ⟨x', hx'⟩) :
Function.Injective (fun x ↦ if h : p x then f ⟨x, h⟩ else f' ⟨x, h⟩) := fun x₁ x₂ h => by
dsimp only at h
by_cases h₁ : p x₁ <;> by_cases h₂ : p x₂
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; injection (hf h)
· rw [dif_pos h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_pos h₂] at h; exact (im_disj h.symm).elim
· rw [dif_neg h₁, dif_neg h₂] at h; injection (hf' h)
#align function.injective.dite Function.Injective.dite
theorem Surjective.of_comp {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Surjective f := fun y ↦
let ⟨x, h⟩ := S y
⟨g x, h⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp Function.Surjective.of_comp
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff (f : α → β) {g : γ → α} (hg : Surjective g) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective f :=
⟨Surjective.of_comp, fun h ↦ h.comp hg⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp_iff Function.Surjective.of_comp_iff
theorem Surjective.of_comp_left {g : γ → α} (S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) (hf : Injective f) :
Surjective g := fun a ↦ let ⟨c, hc⟩ := S (f a); ⟨c, hf hc⟩
theorem Injective.bijective₂_of_surjective {g : γ → α} (hf : Injective f) (hg : Injective g)
(S : Surjective (f ∘ g)) : Bijective f ∧ Bijective g :=
⟨⟨hf, S.of_comp⟩, hg, S.of_comp_left hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.of_comp_iff' (hf : Bijective f) (g : γ → α) :
Surjective (f ∘ g) ↔ Surjective g :=
⟨fun S ↦ S.of_comp_left hf.1, hf.surjective.comp⟩
#align function.surjective.of_comp_iff' Function.Surjective.of_comp_iff'
instance decidableEqPFun (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (α : p → Type*) [∀ hp, DecidableEq (α hp)] :
DecidableEq (∀ hp, α hp)
| f, g => decidable_of_iff (∀ hp, f hp = g hp) funext_iff.symm
protected theorem Surjective.forall (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y, p y) ↔ ∀ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun h x ↦ h (f x), fun h y ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
hx ▸ h x⟩
#align function.surjective.forall Function.Surjective.forall
protected theorem Surjective.forall₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall
#align function.surjective.forall₂ Function.Surjective.forall₂
protected theorem Surjective.forall₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∀ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∀ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ ↦ hf.forall₂
#align function.surjective.forall₃ Function.Surjective.forall₃
protected theorem Surjective.exists (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y, p y) ↔ ∃ x, p (f x) :=
⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, hx.symm ▸ hy⟩,
fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨f x, hx⟩⟩
#align function.surjective.exists Function.Surjective.exists
protected theorem Surjective.exists₂ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂, p y₁ y₂) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂, p (f x₁) (f x₂) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists
#align function.surjective.exists₂ Function.Surjective.exists₂
protected theorem Surjective.exists₃ (hf : Surjective f) {p : β → β → β → Prop} :
(∃ y₁ y₂ y₃, p y₁ y₂ y₃) ↔ ∃ x₁ x₂ x₃, p (f x₁) (f x₂) (f x₃) :=
hf.exists.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ hf.exists₂
#align function.surjective.exists₃ Function.Surjective.exists₃
theorem Surjective.injective_comp_right (hf : Surjective f) : Injective fun g : β → γ ↦ g ∘ f :=
fun _ _ h ↦ funext <| hf.forall.2 <| congr_fun h
#align function.surjective.injective_comp_right Function.Surjective.injective_comp_right
protected theorem Surjective.right_cancellable (hf : Surjective f) {g₁ g₂ : β → γ} :
g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
hf.injective_comp_right.eq_iff
#align function.surjective.right_cancellable Function.Surjective.right_cancellable
| Mathlib/Logic/Function/Basic.lean | 239 | 242 | theorem surjective_of_right_cancellable_Prop (h : ∀ g₁ g₂ : β → Prop, g₁ ∘ f = g₂ ∘ f → g₁ = g₂) :
Surjective f := by |
specialize h (fun y ↦ ∃ x, f x = y) (fun _ ↦ True) (funext fun x ↦ eq_true ⟨_, rfl⟩)
intro y; rw [congr_fun h y]; trivial
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
universe u
variable {L : Type u} [CommRing L] [IsDomain L]
variable (n : ℕ+)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/CyclotomicCharacter.lean | 72 | 75 | theorem rootsOfUnity.integer_power_of_ringEquiv (g : L ≃+* L) :
∃ m : ℤ, ∀ t : rootsOfUnity n L, g (t : Lˣ) = (t ^ m : Lˣ) := by |
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := MonoidHom.map_cyclic ((g : L ≃* L).restrictRootsOfUnity n).toMonoidHom
exact ⟨m, fun t ↦ Units.ext_iff.1 <| SetCoe.ext_iff.2 <| hm t⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
#align_import analysis.convex.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
universe u u'
variable {R R' E F ι ι' α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField R] [LinearOrderedField R'] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup F] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Module R E] [Module R F] [Module R α]
[OrderedSMul R α] {s : Set E}
def Finset.centerMass (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i ∈ t, w i)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i
#align finset.center_mass Finset.centerMass
variable (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open Finset
theorem Finset.centerMass_empty : (∅ : Finset ι).centerMass w z = 0 := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_empty Finset.centerMass_empty
theorem Finset.centerMass_pair (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_pair hne, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align finset.center_mass_pair Finset.centerMass_pair
variable {w}
theorem Finset.centerMass_insert (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).centerMass w z =
(w i / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j ∈ t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel hw, one_div]
#align finset.center_mass_insert Finset.centerMass_insert
theorem Finset.centerMass_singleton (hw : w i ≠ 0) : ({i} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = z i := by
rw [centerMass, sum_singleton, sum_singleton, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hw, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_singleton Finset.centerMass_singleton
@[simp] lemma Finset.centerMass_neg_left : t.centerMass (-w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, inv_neg]
lemma Finset.centerMass_smul_left {c : R'} [Module R' R] [Module R' E] [SMulCommClass R' R R]
[IsScalarTower R' R R] [SMulCommClass R R' E] [IsScalarTower R' R E] (hc : c ≠ 0) :
t.centerMass (c • w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, -smul_assoc, smul_assoc c, ← smul_sum, smul_inv₀, smul_smul_smul_comm, hc]
theorem Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 (hw : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) :
t.centerMass w z = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, hw, inv_one, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1
theorem Finset.centerMass_smul : (t.centerMass w fun i => c • z i) = c • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, Finset.smul_sum, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]
#align finset.center_mass_smul Finset.centerMass_smul
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset ι') (ws : ι → R) (zs : ι → E)
(wt : ι' → R) (zt : ι' → E) (hws : ∑ i ∈ s, ws i = 1) (hwt : ∑ i ∈ t, wt i = 1) (a b : R)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • s.centerMass ws zs + b • t.centerMass wt zt = (s.disjSum t).centerMass
(Sum.elim (fun i => a * ws i) fun j => b * wt j) (Sum.elim zs zt) := by
rw [s.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hws, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hwt, smul_sum, smul_sum, ←
Finset.sum_sum_elim, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, mul_smul]
· rw [sum_sum_elim, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hws, hwt, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
#align finset.center_mass_segment' Finset.centerMass_segment'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Combination.lean | 105 | 112 | theorem Finset.centerMass_segment (s : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.centerMass w₁ z + b • s.centerMass w₂ z =
s.centerMass (fun i => a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) z := by |
have hw : (∑ i ∈ s, (a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i)) = 1 := by
simp only [← mul_sum, sum_add_distrib, mul_one, *]
simp only [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw,
smul_sum, sum_add_distrib, add_smul, mul_smul, *]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Side
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Rotation
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Affine EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
abbrev o := @Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
def oangle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : Real.Angle :=
o.oangle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle EuclideanGeometry.oangle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∡" => EuclideanGeometry.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∡ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (o.continuousAt_oangle hf1 hf2).comp ((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_oangle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₁ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₂ = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self_left_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₁ = 0 :=
o.oangle_self _
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_self_left_right EuclideanGeometry.oangle_self_left_right
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Affine.lean | 75 | 76 | theorem left_ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≠ 0) : p₁ ≠ p₂ := by |
rw [← @vsub_ne_zero V]; exact o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
#align_import data.int.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
open Finset Int
namespace Int
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder ℤ where
finsetIcc a b :=
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIco a b := (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a
finsetIoc a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finsetIoo a b :=
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map <| Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)
finset_mem_Icc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [lt_sub_iff_add_lt, Int.lt_add_one_iff, add_comm] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [← lt_add_one_iff] at hb
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ico a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.mp h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - a).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioc a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [← add_one_le_iff, le_sub_iff_add_le', add_comm _ (1 : ℤ), ← add_assoc] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, ← add_one_le_iff, sub_add, add_sub_cancel_right]
exact ⟨sub_le_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
finset_mem_Ioo a b x := by
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, Int.lt_toNat, Function.Embedding.trans_apply,
Nat.castEmbedding_apply, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, rfl⟩
rw [sub_sub, lt_sub_iff_add_lt'] at h
exact ⟨Int.le.intro a rfl, h⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
use (x - (a + 1)).toNat
rw [toNat_sub_of_le ha, sub_sub]
exact ⟨sub_lt_sub_right hb _, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
variable (a b : ℤ)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_map :
Icc a b =
(Finset.range (b + 1 - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
#align int.Icc_eq_finset_map Int.Icc_eq_finset_map
theorem Ico_eq_finset_map :
Ico a b = (Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding a) :=
rfl
#align int.Ico_eq_finset_map Int.Ico_eq_finset_map
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_map :
Ioc a b =
(Finset.range (b - a).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
#align int.Ioc_eq_finset_map Int.Ioc_eq_finset_map
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_map :
Ioo a b =
(Finset.range (b - a - 1).toNat).map (Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding (a + 1)) :=
rfl
#align int.Ioo_eq_finset_map Int.Ioo_eq_finset_map
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_map :
uIcc a b = (range (max a b + 1 - min a b).toNat).map
(Nat.castEmbedding.trans <| addLeftEmbedding <| min a b) := rfl
#align int.uIcc_eq_finset_map Int.uIcc_eq_finset_map
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = (b + 1 - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Icc Int.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ico Int.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = (b - a).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ioc Int.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = (b - a - 1).toNat := (card_map _).trans <| card_range _
#align int.card_Ioo Int.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a).natAbs + 1 :=
(card_map _).trans <|
Int.ofNat.inj <| by
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Restore `int.coe_nat_inj` and remove the `change`
change ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) _ = ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) _
rw [card_range, sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le <| le_add_one min_le_max), Int.ofNat_add,
Int.natCast_natAbs, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, max_sub_min_eq_abs, add_comm, Int.ofNat_one]
#align int.card_uIcc Int.card_uIcc
theorem card_Icc_of_le (h : a ≤ b + 1) : ((Icc a b).card : ℤ) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [card_Icc, toNat_sub_of_le h]
#align int.card_Icc_of_le Int.card_Icc_of_le
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Interval.lean | 137 | 138 | theorem card_Ico_of_le (h : a ≤ b) : ((Ico a b).card : ℤ) = b - a := by |
rw [card_Ico, toNat_sub_of_le h]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Cone.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
#align_import analysis.convex.cone.dual from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"915591b2bb3ea303648db07284a161a7f2a9e3d4"
open Set LinearMap
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
section Dual
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [InnerProductSpace ℝ H] (s t : Set H)
open RealInnerProductSpace
def Set.innerDualCone (s : Set H) : ConvexCone ℝ H where
carrier := { y | ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫ }
smul_mem' c hc y hy x hx := by
rw [real_inner_smul_right]
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (hy x hx)
add_mem' u hu v hv x hx := by
rw [inner_add_right]
exact add_nonneg (hu x hx) (hv x hx)
#align set.inner_dual_cone Set.innerDualCone
@[simp]
theorem mem_innerDualCone (y : H) (s : Set H) : y ∈ s.innerDualCone ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_inner_dual_cone mem_innerDualCone
@[simp]
theorem innerDualCone_empty : (∅ : Set H).innerDualCone = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr fun _ _ _ => False.elim
#align inner_dual_cone_empty innerDualCone_empty
@[simp]
theorem innerDualCone_zero : (0 : Set H).innerDualCone = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.mpr fun _ _ y (hy : y = 0) => hy.symm ▸ (inner_zero_left _).ge
#align inner_dual_cone_zero innerDualCone_zero
@[simp]
theorem innerDualCone_univ : (univ : Set H).innerDualCone = 0 := by
suffices ∀ x : H, x ∈ (univ : Set H).innerDualCone → x = 0 by
apply SetLike.coe_injective
exact eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.mpr ⟨fun x _ => (inner_zero_right _).ge, this⟩
exact fun x hx => by simpa [← real_inner_self_nonpos] using hx (-x) (mem_univ _)
#align inner_dual_cone_univ innerDualCone_univ
theorem innerDualCone_le_innerDualCone (h : t ⊆ s) : s.innerDualCone ≤ t.innerDualCone :=
fun _ hy x hx => hy x (h hx)
#align inner_dual_cone_le_inner_dual_cone innerDualCone_le_innerDualCone
theorem pointed_innerDualCone : s.innerDualCone.Pointed := fun x _ => by rw [inner_zero_right]
#align pointed_inner_dual_cone pointed_innerDualCone
theorem innerDualCone_singleton (x : H) :
({x} : Set H).innerDualCone = (ConvexCone.positive ℝ ℝ).comap (innerₛₗ ℝ x) :=
ConvexCone.ext fun _ => forall_eq
#align inner_dual_cone_singleton innerDualCone_singleton
theorem innerDualCone_union (s t : Set H) :
(s ∪ t).innerDualCone = s.innerDualCone ⊓ t.innerDualCone :=
le_antisymm (le_inf (fun _ hx _ hy => hx _ <| Or.inl hy) fun _ hx _ hy => hx _ <| Or.inr hy)
fun _ hx _ => Or.rec (hx.1 _) (hx.2 _)
#align inner_dual_cone_union innerDualCone_union
theorem innerDualCone_insert (x : H) (s : Set H) :
(insert x s).innerDualCone = Set.innerDualCone {x} ⊓ s.innerDualCone := by
rw [insert_eq, innerDualCone_union]
#align inner_dual_cone_insert innerDualCone_insert
theorem innerDualCone_iUnion {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → Set H) :
(⋃ i, f i).innerDualCone = ⨅ i, (f i).innerDualCone := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i x hx y hy => hx _ <| mem_iUnion_of_mem _ hy) ?_
intro x hx y hy
rw [ConvexCone.mem_iInf] at hx
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := mem_iUnion.mp hy
exact hx _ _ hj
#align inner_dual_cone_Union innerDualCone_iUnion
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone/InnerDual.lean | 119 | 121 | theorem innerDualCone_sUnion (S : Set (Set H)) :
(⋃₀ S).innerDualCone = sInf (Set.innerDualCone '' S) := by |
simp_rw [sInf_image, sUnion_eq_biUnion, innerDualCone_iUnion]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monomial
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.WithBot
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import data.polynomial.degree.definitions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"808ea4ebfabeb599f21ec4ae87d6dc969597887f"
-- Porting note: `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.WithTop` should be imported for `Nat.cast_withBot`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b c d : R} {n m : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
def degree (p : R[X]) : WithBot ℕ :=
p.support.max
#align polynomial.degree Polynomial.degree
theorem supDegree_eq_degree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree WithBot.some = p.degree :=
max_eq_sup_coe
theorem degree_lt_wf : WellFounded fun p q : R[X] => degree p < degree q :=
InvImage.wf degree wellFounded_lt
#align polynomial.degree_lt_wf Polynomial.degree_lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation R[X] :=
⟨_, degree_lt_wf⟩
def natDegree (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
(degree p).unbot' 0
#align polynomial.nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree
def leadingCoeff (p : R[X]) : R :=
coeff p (natDegree p)
#align polynomial.leading_coeff Polynomial.leadingCoeff
def Monic (p : R[X]) :=
leadingCoeff p = (1 : R)
#align polynomial.monic Polynomial.Monic
@[nontriviality]
theorem monic_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : R[X]) : Monic p :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton Polynomial.monic_of_subsingleton
theorem Monic.def : Monic p ↔ leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align polynomial.monic.def Polynomial.Monic.def
instance Monic.decidable [DecidableEq R] : Decidable (Monic p) := by unfold Monic; infer_instance
#align polynomial.monic.decidable Polynomial.Monic.decidable
@[simp]
theorem Monic.leadingCoeff {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : leadingCoeff p = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.leading_coeff Polynomial.Monic.leadingCoeff
theorem Monic.coeff_natDegree {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) : p.coeff p.natDegree = 1 :=
hp
#align polynomial.monic.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_zero : degree (0 : R[X]) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.degree_zero Polynomial.degree_zero
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_zero : natDegree (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_zero Polynomial.natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree : coeff p (natDegree p) = leadingCoeff p :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.coeff_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_eq_bot : degree p = ⊥ ↔ p = 0 :=
⟨fun h => support_eq_empty.1 (Finset.max_eq_bot.1 h), fun h => h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
#align polynomial.degree_eq_bot Polynomial.degree_eq_bot
@[nontriviality]
theorem degree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : degree p = ⊥ := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, degree_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.degree_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem natDegree_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] : natDegree p = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim p 0, natDegree_zero]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_of_subsingleton Polynomial.natDegree_of_subsingleton
theorem degree_eq_natDegree (hp : p ≠ 0) : degree p = (natDegree p : WithBot ℕ) := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := not_forall.1 (mt Option.eq_none_iff_forall_not_mem.2 (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp))
have hn : degree p = some n := Classical.not_not.1 hn
rw [natDegree, hn]; rfl
#align polynomial.degree_eq_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_eq_natDegree
theorem supDegree_eq_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.supDegree id = p.natDegree := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp
apply WithBot.coe_injective
rw [← AddMonoidAlgebra.supDegree_withBot_some_comp, Function.comp_id, supDegree_eq_degree,
degree_eq_natDegree h, Nat.cast_withBot]
rwa [support_toFinsupp, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, support_eq_empty]
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]; exact WithBot.coe_eq_coe
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq
theorem degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
p.degree = n ↔ p.natDegree = n := by
obtain rfl|h := eq_or_ne p 0
· simp [hn.ne]
· exact degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq h
#align polynomial.degree_eq_iff_nat_degree_eq_of_pos Polynomial.degree_eq_iff_natDegree_eq_of_pos
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : degree p = n) : natDegree p = n := by
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_withBot` is required.
rw [natDegree, h, Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.unbot'_coe]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq_some Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
theorem degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne {n : ℕ} : p.natDegree ≠ n → degree p ≠ n :=
mt natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some
#align polynomial.degree_ne_of_nat_degree_ne Polynomial.degree_ne_of_natDegree_ne
@[simp]
theorem degree_le_natDegree : degree p ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.le_u_l _
#align polynomial.degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.degree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (h : degree p = degree q) :
natDegree p = natDegree q := by unfold natDegree; rw [h]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_degree_eq Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq
theorem le_degree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : (n : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
rw [Nat.cast_withBot]
exact Finset.le_sup (mem_support_iff.2 h)
#align polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_degree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_ne_zero (h : coeff p n ≠ 0) : n ≤ natDegree p := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ), ← degree_eq_natDegree]
· exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
· rintro rfl
exact h rfl
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_ne_zero Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
theorem le_natDegree_of_mem_supp (a : ℕ) : a ∈ p.support → a ≤ natDegree p :=
le_natDegree_of_ne_zero ∘ mem_support_iff.mp
#align polynomial.le_nat_degree_of_mem_supp Polynomial.le_natDegree_of_mem_supp
theorem degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.degree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.degree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_degree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero (pn : p.natDegree ≤ n) (p1 : p.coeff n ≠ 0) :
p.natDegree = n :=
pn.antisymm (le_natDegree_of_ne_zero p1)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_of_le_of_coeff_ne_zero
theorem degree_mono [Semiring S] {f : R[X]} {g : S[X]} (h : f.support ⊆ g.support) :
f.degree ≤ g.degree :=
Finset.sup_mono h
#align polynomial.degree_mono Polynomial.degree_mono
theorem supp_subset_range (h : natDegree p < m) : p.support ⊆ Finset.range m := fun _n hn =>
mem_range.2 <| (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn).trans_lt h
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range Polynomial.supp_subset_range
theorem supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ : p.support ⊆ Finset.range (natDegree p + 1) :=
supp_subset_range (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
#align polynomial.supp_subset_range_nat_degree_succ Polynomial.supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
theorem degree_le_degree (h : coeff q (natDegree p) ≠ 0) : degree p ≤ degree q := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, degree_zero]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_eq_natDegree hp]
exact le_degree_of_ne_zero h
#align polynomial.degree_le_degree Polynomial.degree_le_degree
theorem natDegree_le_iff_degree_le {n : ℕ} : natDegree p ≤ n ↔ degree p ≤ n :=
WithBot.unbot'_le_iff (fun _ ↦ bot_le)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_iff_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
theorem natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.natDegree < n ↔ p.degree < ↑n :=
WithBot.unbot'_lt_iff (absurd · (degree_eq_bot.not.mpr hp))
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_iff_degree_lt Polynomial.natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt
alias ⟨degree_le_of_natDegree_le, natDegree_le_of_degree_le⟩ := natDegree_le_iff_degree_le
#align polynomial.degree_le_of_nat_degree_le Polynomial.degree_le_of_natDegree_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_of_degree_le Polynomial.natDegree_le_of_degree_le
theorem natDegree_le_natDegree [Semiring S] {q : S[X]} (hpq : p.degree ≤ q.degree) :
p.natDegree ≤ q.natDegree :=
WithBot.giUnbot'Bot.gc.monotone_l hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_le_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_le_natDegree
theorem natDegree_lt_natDegree {p q : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) (hpq : p.degree < q.degree) :
p.natDegree < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hq : q = 0
· exact (not_lt_bot <| hq ▸ hpq).elim
rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, degree_eq_natDegree hq, Nat.cast_lt] at hpq
#align polynomial.nat_degree_lt_nat_degree Polynomial.natDegree_lt_natDegree
@[simp]
theorem degree_C (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a) = (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by
rw [degree, ← monomial_zero_left, support_monomial 0 ha, max_eq_sup_coe, sup_singleton,
WithBot.coe_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_C Polynomial.degree_C
theorem degree_C_le : degree (C a) ≤ 0 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· rw [h, C_0]
exact bot_le
· rw [degree_C h]
#align polynomial.degree_C_le Polynomial.degree_C_le
theorem degree_C_lt : degree (C a) < 1 :=
degree_C_le.trans_lt <| WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr zero_lt_one
#align polynomial.degree_C_lt Polynomial.degree_C_lt
theorem degree_one_le : degree (1 : R[X]) ≤ (0 : WithBot ℕ) := by rw [← C_1]; exact degree_C_le
#align polynomial.degree_one_le Polynomial.degree_one_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C (a : R) : natDegree (C a) = 0 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· have : C a = 0 := by rw [ha, C_0]
rw [natDegree, degree_eq_bot.2 this, WithBot.unbot'_bot]
· rw [natDegree, degree_C ha, WithBot.unbot_zero']
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C Polynomial.natDegree_C
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_one : natDegree (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
natDegree_C 1
#align polynomial.nat_degree_one Polynomial.natDegree_one
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_natCast (n : ℕ) : natDegree (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
simp only [← C_eq_natCast, natDegree_C]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_nat_cast Polynomial.natDegree_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias natDegree_nat_cast := natDegree_natCast
theorem degree_natCast_le (n : ℕ) : degree (n : R[X]) ≤ 0 := degree_le_of_natDegree_le (by simp)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias degree_nat_cast_le := degree_natCast_le
@[simp]
theorem degree_monomial (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (monomial n a) = n := by
rw [degree, support_monomial n ha, max_singleton, Nat.cast_withBot]
#align polynomial.degree_monomial Polynomial.degree_monomial
@[simp]
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X ^ n) = n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, degree_monomial n ha]
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow
theorem degree_C_mul_X (ha : a ≠ 0) : degree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow 1 ha
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X
theorem degree_monomial_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (monomial n a) ≤ n :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : a = 0 then by rw [h, (monomial n).map_zero, degree_zero]; exact bot_le
else le_of_eq (degree_monomial n h)
#align polynomial.degree_monomial_le Polynomial.degree_monomial_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) (a : R) : degree (C a * X ^ n) ≤ n := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
apply degree_monomial_le
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_pow_le
theorem degree_C_mul_X_le (a : R) : degree (C a * X) ≤ 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le 1 a
#align polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le Polynomial.degree_C_mul_X_le
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X ^ n) = n :=
natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some (degree_C_mul_X_pow n ha)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_C_mul_X (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) : natDegree (C a * X) = 1 := by
simpa only [pow_one] using natDegree_C_mul_X_pow 1 a ha
#align polynomial.nat_degree_C_mul_X Polynomial.natDegree_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem natDegree_monomial [DecidableEq R] (i : ℕ) (r : R) :
natDegree (monomial i r) = if r = 0 then 0 else i := by
split_ifs with hr
· simp [hr]
· rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, natDegree_C_mul_X_pow i r hr]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial Polynomial.natDegree_monomial
theorem natDegree_monomial_le (a : R) {m : ℕ} : (monomial m a).natDegree ≤ m := by
classical
rw [Polynomial.natDegree_monomial]
split_ifs
exacts [Nat.zero_le _, le_rfl]
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_le Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_le
theorem natDegree_monomial_eq (i : ℕ) {r : R} (r0 : r ≠ 0) : (monomial i r).natDegree = i :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Eq.trans (natDegree_monomial _ _) (if_neg r0)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_monomial_eq Polynomial.natDegree_monomial_eq
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt (h : degree p < n) : coeff p n = 0 :=
Classical.not_not.1 (mt le_degree_of_ne_zero (not_le_of_gt h))
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : p.natDegree < n) :
p.coeff n = 0 := by
apply coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt
by_cases hp : p = 0
· subst hp
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe n
· rwa [degree_eq_natDegree hp, Nat.cast_lt]
#align polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_nat_degree_lt Polynomial.coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
theorem ext_iff_natDegree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.natDegree ≤ n) (hq : q.natDegree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i := by
refine Iff.trans Polynomial.ext_iff ?_
refine forall_congr' fun i => ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => ?_⟩
refine (le_or_lt i n).elim h fun k => ?_
exact
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hp.trans_lt k)).trans
(coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hq.trans_lt k)).symm
#align polynomial.ext_iff_nat_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_natDegree_le
theorem ext_iff_degree_le {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (hp : p.degree ≤ n) (hq : q.degree ≤ n) :
p = q ↔ ∀ i ≤ n, p.coeff i = q.coeff i :=
ext_iff_natDegree_le (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hp) (natDegree_le_of_degree_le hq)
#align polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le Polynomial.ext_iff_degree_le
@[simp]
theorem coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero {p : R[X]} : p.coeff (p.natDegree + 1) = 0 :=
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.coeff_nat_degree_succ_eq_zero Polynomial.coeff_natDegree_succ_eq_zero
-- We need the explicit `Decidable` argument here because an exotic one shows up in a moment!
theorem ite_le_natDegree_coeff (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (I : Decidable (n < 1 + natDegree p)) :
@ite _ (n < 1 + natDegree p) I (coeff p n) 0 = coeff p n := by
split_ifs with h
· rfl
· exact (coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (not_le.1 fun w => h (Nat.lt_one_add_iff.2 w))).symm
#align polynomial.ite_le_nat_degree_coeff Polynomial.ite_le_natDegree_coeff
theorem as_sum_support (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, monomial i (p.coeff i) :=
(sum_monomial_eq p).symm
#align polynomial.as_sum_support Polynomial.as_sum_support
theorem as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ p.support, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i :=
_root_.trans p.as_sum_support <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow
theorem sum_over_range' [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) (n : ℕ)
(w : p.natDegree < n) : p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range n, f a (coeff p a) := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
have := supp_subset_range w
simp only [Polynomial.sum, support, coeff, natDegree, degree] at this ⊢
exact Finsupp.sum_of_support_subset _ this _ fun n _hn => h n
#align polynomial.sum_over_range' Polynomial.sum_over_range'
theorem sum_over_range [AddCommMonoid S] (p : R[X]) {f : ℕ → R → S} (h : ∀ n, f n 0 = 0) :
p.sum f = ∑ a ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), f a (coeff p a) :=
sum_over_range' p h (p.natDegree + 1) (lt_add_one _)
#align polynomial.sum_over_range Polynomial.sum_over_range
-- TODO this is essentially a duplicate of `sum_over_range`, and should be removed.
theorem sum_fin [AddCommMonoid S] (f : ℕ → R → S) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]}
(hn : p.degree < n) : (∑ i : Fin n, f i (p.coeff i)) = p.sum f := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· rw [hp, sum_zero_index, Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro i _
exact hf i
rw [sum_over_range' _ hf n ((natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt hp).mpr hn),
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range fun i => f i (p.coeff i)]
#align polynomial.sum_fin Polynomial.sum_fin
theorem as_sum_range' (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (w : p.natDegree < n) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range n, monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range' monomial_zero_right _ w
#align polynomial.as_sum_range' Polynomial.as_sum_range'
theorem as_sum_range (p : R[X]) : p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), monomial i (coeff p i) :=
p.sum_monomial_eq.symm.trans <| p.sum_over_range <| monomial_zero_right
#align polynomial.as_sum_range Polynomial.as_sum_range
theorem as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow (p : R[X]) :
p = ∑ i ∈ range (p.natDegree + 1), C (coeff p i) * X ^ i :=
p.as_sum_range.trans <| by simp only [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
#align polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree (hn : degree p = n) : coeff p n ≠ 0 := fun h =>
mem_support_iff.mp (mem_of_max hn) h
#align polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree Polynomial.coeff_ne_zero_of_eq_degree
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one (h : degree p ≤ 1) : p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
ext fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp) fun n =>
Nat.casesOn n (by simp [coeff_C]) fun m => by
-- Porting note: `by decide` → `Iff.mpr ..`
have : degree p < m.succ.succ := lt_of_le_of_lt h
(Iff.mpr WithBot.coe_lt_coe <| Nat.succ_lt_succ <| Nat.zero_lt_succ m)
simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this, coeff_C, Nat.succ_ne_zero, coeff_X, Nat.succ_inj',
@eq_comm ℕ 0]
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one (h : degree p = 1) :
p = C p.leadingCoeff * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
(eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one h.le).trans
(by rw [← Nat.cast_one] at h; rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq_some h])
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_degree_eq_one
theorem eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) :
p = C (p.coeff 1) * X + C (p.coeff 0) :=
eq_X_add_C_of_degree_le_one <| degree_le_of_natDegree_le h
#align polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_nat_degree_le_one Polynomial.eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem Monic.eq_X_add_C (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 1) : p = X + C (p.coeff 0) := by
rw [← one_mul X, ← C_1, ← hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, ← eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one hnd.le]
#align polynomial.monic.eq_X_add_C Polynomial.Monic.eq_X_add_C
theorem exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one (h : natDegree p ≤ 1) : ∃ a b, p = C a * X + C b :=
⟨p.coeff 1, p.coeff 0, eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one h⟩
#align polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one Polynomial.exists_eq_X_add_C_of_natDegree_le_one
theorem degree_X_pow_le (n : ℕ) : degree (X ^ n : R[X]) ≤ n := by
simpa only [C_1, one_mul] using degree_C_mul_X_pow_le n (1 : R)
#align polynomial.degree_X_pow_le Polynomial.degree_X_pow_le
theorem degree_X_le : degree (X : R[X]) ≤ 1 :=
degree_monomial_le _ _
#align polynomial.degree_X_le Polynomial.degree_X_le
theorem natDegree_X_le : (X : R[X]).natDegree ≤ 1 :=
natDegree_le_of_degree_le degree_X_le
#align polynomial.nat_degree_X_le Polynomial.natDegree_X_le
theorem mem_support_C_mul_X_pow {n a : ℕ} {c : R} (h : a ∈ support (C c * X ^ n)) : a = n :=
mem_singleton.1 <| support_C_mul_X_pow' n c h
#align polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.mem_support_C_mul_X_pow
theorem card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one {c : R} {n : ℕ} : card (support (C c * X ^ n)) ≤ 1 := by
rw [← card_singleton n]
apply card_le_card (support_C_mul_X_pow' n c)
#align polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one Polynomial.card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Degree/Definitions.lean | 497 | 499 | theorem card_supp_le_succ_natDegree (p : R[X]) : p.support.card ≤ p.natDegree + 1 := by |
rw [← Finset.card_range (p.natDegree + 1)]
exact Finset.card_le_card supp_subset_range_natDegree_succ
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.geom_sum from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
-- Porting note: corrected type in the description of `geom_sum₂_Ico` (in the doc string only).
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Finset MulOpposite
section Semiring
variable [Semiring α]
theorem geom_sum_succ {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = (x * ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i) + 1 := by
simp only [mul_sum, ← pow_succ', sum_range_succ', pow_zero]
#align geom_sum_succ geom_sum_succ
theorem geom_sum_succ' {x : α} {n : ℕ} :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), x ^ i = x ^ n + ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i :=
(sum_range_succ _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
#align geom_sum_succ' geom_sum_succ'
theorem geom_sum_zero (x : α) : ∑ i ∈ range 0, x ^ i = 0 :=
rfl
#align geom_sum_zero geom_sum_zero
| Mathlib/Algebra/GeomSum.lean | 60 | 60 | theorem geom_sum_one (x : α) : ∑ i ∈ range 1, x ^ i = 1 := by | simp [geom_sum_succ']
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
#align ordinal.is_limit_add_iff Ordinal.isLimit_add_iff
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_add_iff Ordinal.dvd_add_iff
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
#align ordinal.div_mul_cancel Ordinal.div_mul_cancel
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
#align ordinal.le_of_dvd Ordinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
#align ordinal.dvd_antisymm Ordinal.dvd_antisymm
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.mod_def Ordinal.mod_def
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
#align ordinal.mod_le Ordinal.mod_le
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_zero Ordinal.mod_zero
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt Ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
#align ordinal.zero_mod Ordinal.zero_mod
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
#align ordinal.div_add_mod Ordinal.div_add_mod
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
#align ordinal.mod_lt Ordinal.mod_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_self Ordinal.mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_one Ordinal.mod_one
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
#align ordinal.mul_add_mod_self Ordinal.mul_add_mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
#align ordinal.mul_mod Ordinal.mul_mod
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
#align ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
#align ordinal.mod_mod Ordinal.mod_mod
def bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
∀ a < type r, α := fun a ha => f (enum r a ha)
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'
def bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} : (ι → α) → ∀ a < type (@WellOrderingRel ι), α :=
bfamilyOfFamily' WellOrderingRel
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily
def familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, α) : ι → α := fun i =>
f (typein r i)
(by
rw [← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i)
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'
def familyOfBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : o.out.α → α :=
familyOfBFamily' (· < ·) (type_lt o) f
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily Ordinal.familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily'_typein {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily' r f (typein r i) (typein_lt_type r i) = f i := by
simp only [bfamilyOfFamily', enum_typein]
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family'_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'_typein
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily_typein {ι} (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily f (typein _ i) (typein_lt_type _ i) = f i :=
bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ f i
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily_typein
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily'_enum {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily' r ho f (enum r i (by rwa [ho])) = f i hi := by
simp only [familyOfBFamily', typein_enum]
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily'_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'_enum
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily_enum (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily o f
(enum (· < ·) i
(by
convert hi
exact type_lt _)) =
f i hi :=
familyOfBFamily'_enum _ (type_lt o) f _ _
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily_enum
def brange (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : Set α :=
{ a | ∃ i hi, f i hi = a }
#align ordinal.brange Ordinal.brange
theorem mem_brange {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, α} {a} : a ∈ brange o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.mem_brange Ordinal.mem_brange
theorem mem_brange_self {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) : f i hi ∈ brange o f :=
⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
#align ordinal.mem_brange_self Ordinal.mem_brange_self
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = brange o f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, familyOfBFamily'_enum _ _ _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily'
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily o f) = brange o f :=
range_familyOfBFamily' _ _ f
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = range f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily'
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) : brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = range f :=
brange_bfamilyOfFamily' _ _
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_const {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) {c : α} : (brange o fun _ _ => c) = {c} := by
rw [← range_familyOfBFamily]
exact @Set.range_const _ o.out.α (out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho) c
#align ordinal.brange_const Ordinal.brange_const
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α)
(g : α → β) : (fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily' r f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily' r (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily'
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) (g : α → β) :
(fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily' r ho f = familyOfBFamily' r ho fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily'
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily o f = familyOfBFamily o fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily
-- Porting note: Universes should be specified in `sup`s.
def sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
iSup f
#align ordinal.sup Ordinal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sSup (Set.range f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sSup_eq_sup
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨(iSup (succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact le_of_lt (Cardinal.lt_ord.2 ((lt_succ _).trans_le
(le_ciSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{_, v} _) _)))⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_range Ordinal.bddAbove_range
theorem le_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup.{_, v} f := fun i =>
le_csSup (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f) (mem_range_self i)
#align ordinal.le_sup Ordinal.le_sup
theorem sup_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : sup.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f)).trans (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_le_iff Ordinal.sup_le_iff
theorem sup_le {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : (∀ i, f i ≤ a) → sup.{_, v} f ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.sup_le Ordinal.sup_le
theorem lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : a < sup.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_sup Ordinal.lt_sup
theorem ne_sup_iff_lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup.{_, v} f :=
⟨fun hf _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf _), fun hf _ => ne_of_lt (hf _)⟩
#align ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup Ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup
theorem sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) {a} (hao : a < sup.{_, v} f) : succ a < sup.{_, v} f := by
by_contra! hoa
exact
hao.not_le (sup_le fun i => le_of_lt_succ <| (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf i)).trans_le hoa)
#align ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup Ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
sup.{_, v} f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (sup_le fun i => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_sup f i
#align ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff
theorem IsNormal.sup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f) {ι : Type u}
(g : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) [Nonempty ι] : f (sup.{_, v} g) = sup.{_, w} (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [sup_le_iff]; simp only [comp]; rw [H.le_set' Set.univ Set.univ_nonempty g] <;>
simp [sup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.sup Ordinal.IsNormal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty {ι} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align ordinal.sup_empty Ordinal.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_const {ι} [_hι : Nonempty ι] (o : Ordinal) : (sup fun _ : ι => o) = o :=
ciSup_const
#align ordinal.sup_const Ordinal.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_unique {ι} [Unique ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = f default :=
ciSup_unique
#align ordinal.sup_unique Ordinal.sup_unique
theorem sup_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f ≤ sup.{v, max u w} g :=
sup_le fun i =>
match h (mem_range_self i) with
| ⟨_j, hj⟩ => hj ▸ le_sup _ _
#align ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset Ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset
theorem sup_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f = Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f = sup.{v, max u w} g :=
(sup_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (sup_le_of_range_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq Ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq
@[simp]
theorem sup_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : Sum α β → Ordinal) :
sup.{max u v, w} f =
max (sup.{u, max v w} fun a => f (Sum.inl a)) (sup.{v, max u w} fun b => f (Sum.inr b)) := by
apply (sup_le_iff.2 _).antisymm (max_le_iff.2 ⟨_, _⟩)
· rintro (i | i)
· exact le_max_of_le_left (le_sup _ i)
· exact le_max_of_le_right (le_sup _ i)
all_goals
apply sup_le_of_range_subset.{_, max u v, w}
rintro i ⟨a, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
#align ordinal.sup_sum Ordinal.sup_sum
theorem unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β → α)
(h : type r ≤ sup.{u, u} (typein r ∘ f)) : Unbounded r (range f) :=
(not_bounded_iff _).1 fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
not_lt_of_le h <|
lt_of_le_of_lt
(sup_le fun y => le_of_lt <| (typein_lt_typein r).2 <| hx _ <| mem_range_self y)
(typein_lt_type r x)
#align ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge Ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge
theorem le_sup_shrink_equiv {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) (a) (ha : a ∈ s) :
a ≤ sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val := by
convert le_sup.{u, u} (fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val) ((@equivShrink s hs) ⟨a, ha⟩)
rw [symm_apply_apply]
#align ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv Ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio o) :=
let f : o.out.α → Set.Iio o :=
fun x => ⟨typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
let hf : Surjective f := fun b =>
⟨enum (· < ·) b.val
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact b.prop),
Subtype.ext (typein_enum _ _)⟩
small_of_surjective hf
#align ordinal.small_Iio Ordinal.small_Iio
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_succ]
infer_instance
#align ordinal.small_Iic Ordinal.small_Iic
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => small_subset <| show s ⊆ Iic a from fun _x hx => h hx, fun h =>
⟨sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s h).symm x).val, le_sup_shrink_equiv h⟩⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_iff_small Ordinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Ordinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align ordinal.bdd_above_of_small Ordinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem sup_eq_sSup {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) :
(sup.{u, u} fun x => (@equivShrink s hs).symm x) = sSup s :=
let hs' := bddAbove_iff_small.2 hs
((csSup_le_iff' hs').2 (le_sup_shrink_equiv hs)).antisymm'
(sup_le fun _x => le_csSup hs' (Subtype.mem _))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_Sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sSup
theorem sSup_ord {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} (hs : BddAbove s) : (sSup s).ord = sSup (ord '' s) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [csSup_le_iff'
(bddAbove_iff_small.2 (@small_image _ _ _ s (Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small.1 hs))),
ord_le, csSup_le_iff' hs]
simp [ord_le]
#align ordinal.Sup_ord Ordinal.sSup_ord
theorem iSup_ord {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
(iSup f).ord = ⨆ i, (f i).ord := by
unfold iSup
convert sSup_ord hf
-- Porting note: `change` is required.
conv_lhs => change range (ord ∘ f)
rw [range_comp]
#align ordinal.supr_ord Ordinal.iSup_ord
private theorem sup_le_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop)
[IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) ≤ sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_le fun i => by
cases'
typein_surj r'
(by
rw [ho', ← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i) with
j hj
simp_rw [familyOfBFamily', ← hj]
apply le_sup
theorem sup_eq_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
[IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_eq_of_range_eq.{u, u, v} (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sup
def bsup (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.bsup Ordinal.bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup' {o : Ordinal.{u}} {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
sup_eq_sup r _ ho _ f
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup' Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem sSup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sSup (brange o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f := by
congr
rw [range_familyOfBFamily]
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sSup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = sup.{_, v} f := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [← sup_eq_bsup' r, enum_typein,
familyOfBFamily', bfamilyOfFamily']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup' Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup'
theorem bsup_eq_bsup {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι r']
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r' f) := by
rw [bsup_eq_sup', bsup_eq_sup']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup Ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
bsup_eq_sup' _ f
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup
@[congr]
theorem bsup_congr {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o₁, Ordinal.{max u v}) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
bsup.{_, v} o₁ f = bsup.{_, v} o₂ fun a h => f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm) := by
subst ho
-- Porting note: `rfl` is required.
rfl
#align ordinal.bsup_congr Ordinal.bsup_congr
theorem bsup_le_iff {o f a} : bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.trans
⟨fun h i hi => by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
exact h _, fun h i => h _ _⟩
#align ordinal.bsup_le_iff Ordinal.bsup_le_iff
theorem bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal} {a} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≤ a) → bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a :=
bsup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.bsup_le Ordinal.bsup_le
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
#align ordinal.le_bsup Ordinal.le_bsup
theorem lt_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) {a} :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a < f i hi := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@bsup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup
theorem IsNormal.bsup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f)
{o : Ordinal.{u}} :
∀ (g : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), o ≠ 0 → f (bsup.{_, v} o g) = bsup.{_, w} o fun a h => f (g a h) :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ g h => by
haveI := type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h
rw [← sup_eq_bsup' r, IsNormal.sup.{_, v, w} H, ← sup_eq_bsup' r] <;> rfl
#align ordinal.is_normal.bsup Ordinal.IsNormal.bsup
theorem lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{_, v} o f :=
⟨fun hf _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_bsup _ _ _) (hf _ _), fun hf _ _ => ne_of_lt (hf _ _)⟩
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup
theorem bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i : Ordinal} (h : i < o), f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) (a) :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f → succ a < bsup.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup] at *
exact sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup fun i => hf _
#align ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} : bsup o f = 0 ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun i hi => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i hi)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_bsup f i hi
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff
theorem lt_bsup_of_limit {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
(hf _ _ <| lt_succ i).trans_le (le_bsup f (succ i) <| ho _ h)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit
theorem bsup_succ_of_mono {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < succ o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : bsup _ f = f o (lt_succ o) :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _i hi => hf _ _ <| le_of_lt_succ hi) (le_bsup _ _ _)
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono Ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono
@[simp]
theorem bsup_zero (f : ∀ a < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 0 f = 0 :=
bsup_eq_zero_iff.2 fun i hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim
#align ordinal.bsup_zero Ordinal.bsup_zero
theorem bsup_const {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(bsup.{_, v} o fun _ _ => a) = a :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) (le_bsup _ 0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho))
#align ordinal.bsup_const Ordinal.bsup_const
@[simp]
theorem bsup_one (f : ∀ a < (1 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 1 f = f 0 zero_lt_one := by
simp_rw [← sup_eq_bsup, sup_unique, familyOfBFamily, familyOfBFamily', typein_one_out]
#align ordinal.bsup_one Ordinal.bsup_one
theorem bsup_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f ≤ bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
bsup_le fun i hi => by
obtain ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩ := h ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
rw [← hj']
apply le_bsup
#align ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset Ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset
theorem bsup_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f = brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f = bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
(bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq Ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq
def lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (succ ∘ f)
#align ordinal.lsub Ordinal.lsub
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (succ ∘ f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub
theorem lsub_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i < a := by
convert sup_le_iff.{_, v} (f := succ ∘ f) (a := a) using 2
-- Porting note: `comp_apply` is required.
simp only [comp_apply, succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.lsub_le_iff Ordinal.lsub_le_iff
theorem lsub_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {a} : (∀ i, f i < a) → lsub f ≤ a :=
lsub_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.lsub_le Ordinal.lsub_le
theorem lt_lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) (i) : f i < lsub f :=
succ_le_iff.1 (le_sup _ i)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub Ordinal.lt_lsub
theorem lt_lsub_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
a < lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@lsub_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub_iff Ordinal.lt_lsub_iff
theorem sup_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} f ≤ lsub.{_, v} f :=
sup_le fun i => (lt_lsub f i).le
#align ordinal.sup_le_lsub Ordinal.sup_le_lsub
theorem lsub_le_sup_succ {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ succ (sup.{_, v} f) :=
lsub_le fun i => lt_succ_iff.2 (le_sup f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ Ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ
theorem sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ∨ succ (sup.{_, v} f) = lsub.{_, v} f := by
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (sup_le_lsub.{_, v} f) with h h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ((succ_le_of_lt h).antisymm (lsub_le_sup_succ f))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub
theorem sup_succ_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (sup.{_, v} f) ≤ lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup.{_, v} f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_contra! hf
exact (succ_le_iff.1 h).ne ((sup_le_lsub f).antisymm (lsub_le (ne_sup_iff_lt_sup.1 hf)))
rintro ⟨_, hf⟩
rw [succ_le_iff, ← hf]
exact lt_lsub _ _
#align ordinal.sup_succ_le_lsub Ordinal.sup_succ_le_lsub
theorem sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (sup.{_, v} f) = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup.{_, v} f :=
(lsub_le_sup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (sup_succ_le_lsub f)
#align ordinal.sup_succ_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_succ_eq_lsub
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∀ a < lsub.{_, v} f, succ a < lsub.{_, v} f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hf => le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le fun i => ?_)⟩
· rw [← h]
exact fun a => sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup fun i => (lsub_le_iff.1 (le_of_eq h.symm) i).ne
by_contra! hle
have heq := (sup_succ_eq_lsub f).2 ⟨i, le_antisymm (le_sup _ _) hle⟩
have :=
hf _
(by
rw [← heq]
exact lt_succ (sup f))
rw [heq] at this
exact this.false
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ
theorem sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup.{_, v} f :=
⟨fun h i => by
rw [h]
apply lt_lsub, fun h => le_antisymm (sup_le_lsub f) (lsub_le h)⟩
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_iff_lt_sup
@[simp]
theorem lsub_empty {ι} [h : IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : lsub f = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, lsub_le_iff]
exact h.elim
#align ordinal.lsub_empty Ordinal.lsub_empty
theorem lsub_pos {ι : Type u} [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : 0 < lsub.{_, v} f :=
h.elim fun i => (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt (lt_lsub f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_pos Ordinal.lsub_pos
@[simp]
theorem lsub_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨fun i => ?_⟩, fun h => @lsub_empty _ h _⟩
have := @lsub_pos.{_, v} _ ⟨i⟩ f
rw [h] at this
exact this.false
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.lsub_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem lsub_const {ι} [Nonempty ι] (o : Ordinal) : (lsub fun _ : ι => o) = succ o :=
sup_const (succ o)
#align ordinal.lsub_const Ordinal.lsub_const
@[simp]
theorem lsub_unique {ι} [Unique ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : lsub f = succ (f default) :=
sup_unique _
#align ordinal.lsub_unique Ordinal.lsub_unique
theorem lsub_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) : lsub.{u, max v w} f ≤ lsub.{v, max u w} g :=
sup_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} (by convert Set.image_subset succ h <;> apply Set.range_comp)
#align ordinal.lsub_le_of_range_subset Ordinal.lsub_le_of_range_subset
theorem lsub_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f = Set.range g) : lsub.{u, max v w} f = lsub.{v, max u w} g :=
(lsub_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (lsub_le_of_range_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_of_range_eq Ordinal.lsub_eq_of_range_eq
@[simp]
theorem lsub_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : Sum α β → Ordinal) :
lsub.{max u v, w} f =
max (lsub.{u, max v w} fun a => f (Sum.inl a)) (lsub.{v, max u w} fun b => f (Sum.inr b)) :=
sup_sum _
#align ordinal.lsub_sum Ordinal.lsub_sum
theorem lsub_not_mem_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f ∉ Set.range f := fun ⟨i, h⟩ =>
h.not_lt (lt_lsub f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_not_mem_range Ordinal.lsub_not_mem_range
theorem nonempty_compl_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : (Set.range f)ᶜ.Nonempty :=
⟨_, lsub_not_mem_range.{_, v} f⟩
#align ordinal.nonempty_compl_range Ordinal.nonempty_compl_range
@[simp]
theorem lsub_typein (o : Ordinal) : lsub.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o :=
(lsub_le.{u, u} typein_lt_self).antisymm
(by
by_contra! h
-- Porting note: `nth_rw` → `conv_rhs` & `rw`
conv_rhs at h => rw [← type_lt o]
simpa [typein_enum] using lt_lsub.{u, u} (typein (· < ·)) (enum (· < ·) _ h))
#align ordinal.lsub_typein Ordinal.lsub_typein
theorem sup_typein_limit {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a, a < o → succ a < o) :
sup.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop)) = o := by
-- Porting note: `rwa` → `rw` & `assumption`
rw [(sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ.{u, u} (typein (· < ·))).2] <;> rw [lsub_typein o]; assumption
#align ordinal.sup_typein_limit Ordinal.sup_typein_limit
@[simp]
theorem sup_typein_succ {o : Ordinal} :
sup.{u, u} (typein ((· < ·) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) = o := by
cases'
sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub.{u, u}
(typein ((· < ·) : (succ o).out.α → (succ o).out.α → Prop)) with
h h
· rw [sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ] at h
simp only [lsub_typein] at h
exact (h o (lt_succ o)).false.elim
rw [← succ_eq_succ_iff, h]
apply lsub_typein
#align ordinal.sup_typein_succ Ordinal.sup_typein_succ
def blsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
bsup.{_, v} o fun a ha => succ (f a ha)
#align ordinal.blsub Ordinal.blsub
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_blsub (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(bsup.{_, v} o fun a ha => succ (f a ha)) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub
theorem lsub_eq_blsub' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
sup_eq_bsup'.{_, v} r ho fun a ha => succ (f a ha)
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub' Ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub'
theorem lsub_eq_lsub {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
[IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) := by
rw [lsub_eq_blsub', lsub_eq_blsub']
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_lsub Ordinal.lsub_eq_lsub
@[simp]
theorem lsub_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f :=
lsub_eq_blsub' _ _ _
#align ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub Ordinal.lsub_eq_blsub
@[simp]
theorem blsub_eq_lsub' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
bsup_eq_sup'.{_, v} r (succ ∘ f)
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub' Ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub'
theorem blsub_eq_blsub {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι r']
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r' f) := by
rw [blsub_eq_lsub', blsub_eq_lsub']
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_blsub Ordinal.blsub_eq_blsub
@[simp]
theorem blsub_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
blsub_eq_lsub' _ _
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub Ordinal.blsub_eq_lsub
@[congr]
theorem blsub_congr {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o₁, Ordinal.{max u v}) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
blsub.{_, v} o₁ f = blsub.{_, v} o₂ fun a h => f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm) := by
subst ho
-- Porting note: `rfl` is required.
rfl
#align ordinal.blsub_congr Ordinal.blsub_congr
theorem blsub_le_iff {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
blsub.{_, v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < a := by
convert bsup_le_iff.{_, v} (f := fun a ha => succ (f a ha)) (a := a) using 2
simp_rw [succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.blsub_le_iff Ordinal.blsub_le_iff
theorem blsub_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal} {a} : (∀ i h, f i h < a) → blsub o f ≤ a :=
blsub_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.blsub_le Ordinal.blsub_le
theorem lt_blsub {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) (i h) : f i h < blsub o f :=
blsub_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
#align ordinal.lt_blsub Ordinal.lt_blsub
theorem lt_blsub_iff {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
a < blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a ≤ f i hi := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@blsub_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_blsub_iff Ordinal.lt_blsub_iff
theorem bsup_le_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f ≤ blsub.{_, v} o f :=
bsup_le fun i h => (lt_blsub f i h).le
#align ordinal.bsup_le_blsub Ordinal.bsup_le_blsub
theorem blsub_le_bsup_succ {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} o f ≤ succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) :=
blsub_le fun i h => lt_succ_iff.2 (le_bsup f i h)
#align ordinal.blsub_le_bsup_succ Ordinal.blsub_le_bsup_succ
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f ∨ succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup, ← lsub_eq_blsub]
exact sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub _
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_or_succ_bsup_eq_blsub
theorem bsup_succ_le_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) ≤ blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup.{_, v} o f := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_contra! hf
exact
ne_of_lt (succ_le_iff.1 h)
(le_antisymm (bsup_le_blsub f) (blsub_le (lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup.1 hf)))
rintro ⟨_, _, hf⟩
rw [succ_le_iff, ← hf]
exact lt_blsub _ _ _
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_le_blsub Ordinal.bsup_succ_le_blsub
theorem bsup_succ_eq_blsub {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (bsup.{_, v} o f) = blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
(blsub_le_bsup_succ f).le_iff_eq.symm.trans (bsup_succ_le_blsub f)
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_eq_blsub Ordinal.bsup_succ_eq_blsub
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_iff_succ {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∀ a < blsub.{_, v} o f, succ a < blsub.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup, ← lsub_eq_blsub]
apply sup_eq_lsub_iff_succ
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_iff_succ Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_iff_succ
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi < bsup.{_, v} o f :=
⟨fun h i => by
rw [h]
apply lt_blsub, fun h => le_antisymm (bsup_le_blsub f) (blsub_le h)⟩
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup
theorem bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : IsLimit o)
{f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} (hf : ∀ a ha, f a ha < f (succ a) (ho.2 a ha)) :
bsup.{_, v} o f = blsub.{_, v} o f := by
rw [bsup_eq_blsub_iff_lt_bsup]
exact fun i hi => (hf i hi).trans_le (le_bsup f _ _)
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit Ordinal.bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit
theorem blsub_succ_of_mono {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < succ o, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : blsub.{_, v} _ f = succ (f o (lt_succ o)) :=
bsup_succ_of_mono fun {_ _} hi hj h => succ_le_succ (hf hi hj h)
#align ordinal.blsub_succ_of_mono Ordinal.blsub_succ_of_mono
@[simp]
theorem blsub_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} : blsub o f = 0 ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← lsub_eq_blsub, lsub_eq_zero_iff]
exact out_empty_iff_eq_zero
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.blsub_eq_zero_iff
-- Porting note: `rwa` → `rw`
@[simp]
theorem blsub_zero (f : ∀ a < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : blsub 0 f = 0 := by rw [blsub_eq_zero_iff]
#align ordinal.blsub_zero Ordinal.blsub_zero
theorem blsub_pos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) : 0 < blsub o f :=
(Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt (lt_blsub f 0 ho)
#align ordinal.blsub_pos Ordinal.blsub_pos
theorem blsub_type {α : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : ∀ a < type r, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
blsub.{_, v} (type r) f = lsub.{_, v} fun a => f (typein r a) (typein_lt_type _ _) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun o => by
rw [blsub_le_iff, lsub_le_iff];
exact ⟨fun H b => H _ _, fun H i h => by simpa only [typein_enum] using H (enum r i h)⟩
#align ordinal.blsub_type Ordinal.blsub_type
theorem blsub_const {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : Ordinal) :
(blsub.{u, v} o fun _ _ => a) = succ a :=
bsup_const.{u, v} ho (succ a)
#align ordinal.blsub_const Ordinal.blsub_const
@[simp]
theorem blsub_one (f : ∀ a < (1 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : blsub 1 f = succ (f 0 zero_lt_one) :=
bsup_one _
#align ordinal.blsub_one Ordinal.blsub_one
@[simp]
theorem blsub_id : ∀ o, (blsub.{u, u} o fun x _ => x) = o :=
lsub_typein
#align ordinal.blsub_id Ordinal.blsub_id
theorem bsup_id_limit {o : Ordinal} : (∀ a < o, succ a < o) → (bsup.{u, u} o fun x _ => x) = o :=
sup_typein_limit
#align ordinal.bsup_id_limit Ordinal.bsup_id_limit
@[simp]
theorem bsup_id_succ (o) : (bsup.{u, u} (succ o) fun x _ => x) = o :=
sup_typein_succ
#align ordinal.bsup_id_succ Ordinal.bsup_id_succ
theorem blsub_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : blsub.{u, max v w} o f ≤ blsub.{v, max u w} o' g :=
bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{u, v, w} fun a ⟨b, hb, hb'⟩ => by
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := h ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩
simp_rw [← hc'] at hb'
exact ⟨c, hc, hb'⟩
#align ordinal.blsub_le_of_brange_subset Ordinal.blsub_le_of_brange_subset
theorem blsub_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : { o | ∃ i hi, f i hi = o } = { o | ∃ i hi, g i hi = o }) :
blsub.{u, max v w} o f = blsub.{v, max u w} o' g :=
(blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (blsub_le_of_brange_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.blsub_eq_of_brange_eq Ordinal.blsub_eq_of_brange_eq
theorem bsup_comp {o o' : Ordinal.{max u v}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v w}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi) (hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hg : blsub.{_, u} o' g = o) :
(bsup.{_, w} o' fun a ha => f (g a ha) (by rw [← hg]; apply lt_blsub)) = bsup.{_, w} o f := by
apply le_antisymm <;> refine bsup_le fun i hi => ?_
· apply le_bsup
· rw [← hg, lt_blsub_iff] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩
exact (hf _ _ hj').trans (le_bsup _ _ _)
#align ordinal.bsup_comp Ordinal.bsup_comp
theorem blsub_comp {o o' : Ordinal.{max u v}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v w}}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi) (hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hg : blsub.{_, u} o' g = o) :
(blsub.{_, w} o' fun a ha => f (g a ha) (by rw [← hg]; apply lt_blsub)) = blsub.{_, w} o f :=
@bsup_comp.{u, v, w} o _ (fun a ha => succ (f a ha))
(fun {_ _} _ _ h => succ_le_succ_iff.2 (hf _ _ h)) g hg
#align ordinal.blsub_comp Ordinal.blsub_comp
theorem IsNormal.bsup_eq {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{max u v}} (H : IsNormal f) {o : Ordinal.{u}}
(h : IsLimit o) : (Ordinal.bsup.{_, v} o fun x _ => f x) = f o := by
rw [← IsNormal.bsup.{u, u, v} H (fun x _ => x) h.1, bsup_id_limit h.2]
#align ordinal.is_normal.bsup_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.bsup_eq
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,963 | 1,966 | theorem IsNormal.blsub_eq {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{max u v}} (H : IsNormal f) {o : Ordinal.{u}}
(h : IsLimit o) : (blsub.{_, v} o fun x _ => f x) = f o := by |
rw [← IsNormal.bsup_eq.{u, v} H h, bsup_eq_blsub_of_lt_succ_limit h]
exact fun a _ => H.1 a
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 247 | 254 | theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by |
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
(f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ η ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_middle
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
(f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ g ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_right
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_whiskerLeft_symm (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom = (λ_ f).hom ≫ η := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (λ_ g).inv = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft_symm
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ≫ η := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_naturality
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor_inv_naturality CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor_inv_naturality
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (ρ_ f).inv ≫ η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom := by
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id_symm CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id_symm
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : 𝟙 a ◁ η = 𝟙 a ◁ θ ↔ η = θ := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iff CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_iff
theorem whiskerRight_iff {f g : a ⟶ b} (η θ : f ⟶ g) : η ▷ 𝟙 b = θ ▷ 𝟙 b ↔ η = θ := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iff CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_iff
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).hom ▷ g = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).hom ≫ (λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_iff, whiskerLeft_comp, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom, ←
cancel_epi ((α_ _ _ _).hom ▷ _), pentagon_assoc, triangle, ← associator_naturality_middle, ←
comp_whiskerRight_assoc, triangle, associator_naturality_left]
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_whiskerRight
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ f).inv ▷ g = (λ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).hom = (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).inv ≫ (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).hom := by
rw [← whiskerRight_iff, comp_whiskerRight, ← cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).inv, ←
cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ _ _ _).inv), pentagon_inv_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right, ←
associator_inv_naturality_middle, ← whiskerLeft_comp_assoc, triangle_assoc_comp_right,
associator_inv_naturality_right]
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_rightUnitor
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (ρ_ g).inv = (ρ_ (f ≫ g)).inv ≫ (α_ f g (𝟙 c)).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_right_unitor_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_rightUnitor_inv
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_comp (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ (f ≫ g)).hom = (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).inv ≫ (λ_ f).hom ▷ g := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor_comp CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor_comp
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 464 | 465 | theorem leftUnitor_comp_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(λ_ (f ≫ g)).inv = (λ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ (𝟙 a) f g).hom := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import category_theory.limits.constructions.finite_products_of_binary_products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ac3ae212f394f508df43e37aa093722fa9b65d31"
universe v v' u u'
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {D : Type u'} [Category.{v'} D]
@[simps!] -- Porting note: removed semi-reducible config
def extendFan {n : ℕ} {f : Fin (n + 1) → C} (c₁ : Fan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ)
(c₂ : BinaryFan (f 0) c₁.pt) : Fan f :=
Fan.mk c₂.pt
(by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· apply c₂.fst
· intro i
apply c₂.snd ≫ c₁.π.app ⟨i⟩)
#align category_theory.extend_fan CategoryTheory.extendFan
def extendFanIsLimit {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → C) {c₁ : Fan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ}
{c₂ : BinaryFan (f 0) c₁.pt} (t₁ : IsLimit c₁) (t₂ : IsLimit c₂) :
IsLimit (extendFan c₁ c₂) where
lift s := by
apply (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ (s.π.app ⟨0⟩) _).1
apply t₁.lift ⟨_, Discrete.natTrans fun ⟨i⟩ => s.π.app ⟨i.succ⟩⟩
fac := fun s ⟨j⟩ => by
refine Fin.inductionOn j ?_ ?_
· apply (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.1
· rintro i -
dsimp only [extendFan_π_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ, ← assoc, (BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.2, t₁.fac]
rfl
uniq s m w := by
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext t₂
· rw [(BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.1]
apply w ⟨0⟩
· rw [(BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' t₂ _ _).2.2]
apply t₁.uniq ⟨_, _⟩
rintro ⟨j⟩
rw [assoc]
dsimp only [Discrete.natTrans_app]
rw [← w ⟨j.succ⟩]
dsimp only [extendFan_π_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ]
#align category_theory.extend_fan_is_limit CategoryTheory.extendFanIsLimit
section
variable [HasBinaryProducts C] [HasTerminal C]
private theorem hasProduct_fin : ∀ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → C), HasProduct f
| 0 => fun f => by
letI : HasLimitsOfShape (Discrete (Fin 0)) C :=
hasLimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.equivalence.{0} finZeroEquiv'.symm)
infer_instance
| n + 1 => fun f => by
haveI := hasProduct_fin n
apply HasLimit.mk ⟨_, extendFanIsLimit f (limit.isLimit _) (limit.isLimit _)⟩
theorem hasFiniteProducts_of_has_binary_and_terminal : HasFiniteProducts C := by
refine ⟨fun n => ⟨fun K => ?_⟩⟩
letI := hasProduct_fin n fun n => K.obj ⟨n⟩
let that : (Discrete.functor fun n => K.obj ⟨n⟩) ≅ K := Discrete.natIso fun ⟨i⟩ => Iso.refl _
apply @hasLimitOfIso _ _ _ _ _ _ this that
#align category_theory.has_finite_products_of_has_binary_and_terminal CategoryTheory.hasFiniteProducts_of_has_binary_and_terminal
end
@[simps!] -- Porting note: removed semireducible config
def extendCofan {n : ℕ} {f : Fin (n + 1) → C} (c₁ : Cofan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ)
(c₂ : BinaryCofan (f 0) c₁.pt) : Cofan f :=
Cofan.mk c₂.pt
(by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· apply c₂.inl
· intro i
apply c₁.ι.app ⟨i⟩ ≫ c₂.inr)
#align category_theory.extend_cofan CategoryTheory.extendCofan
def extendCofanIsColimit {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → C) {c₁ : Cofan fun i : Fin n => f i.succ}
{c₂ : BinaryCofan (f 0) c₁.pt} (t₁ : IsColimit c₁) (t₂ : IsColimit c₂) :
IsColimit (extendCofan c₁ c₂) where
desc s := by
apply (BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' t₂ (s.ι.app ⟨0⟩) _).1
apply t₁.desc ⟨_, Discrete.natTrans fun i => s.ι.app ⟨i.as.succ⟩⟩
fac s := by
rintro ⟨j⟩
refine Fin.inductionOn j ?_ ?_
· apply (BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' t₂ _ _).2.1
· rintro i -
dsimp only [extendCofan_ι_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ, assoc, (BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' t₂ _ _).2.2, t₁.fac]
rfl
uniq s m w := by
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext t₂
· rw [(BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' t₂ _ _).2.1]
apply w ⟨0⟩
· rw [(BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' t₂ _ _).2.2]
apply t₁.uniq ⟨_, _⟩
rintro ⟨j⟩
dsimp only [Discrete.natTrans_app]
rw [← w ⟨j.succ⟩]
dsimp only [extendCofan_ι_app]
rw [Fin.cases_succ, assoc]
#align category_theory.extend_cofan_is_colimit CategoryTheory.extendCofanIsColimit
section
variable [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [HasInitial C]
private theorem hasCoproduct_fin : ∀ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → C), HasCoproduct f
| 0 => fun f => by
letI : HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete (Fin 0)) C :=
hasColimitsOfShape_of_equivalence (Discrete.equivalence.{0} finZeroEquiv'.symm)
infer_instance
| n + 1 => fun f => by
haveI := hasCoproduct_fin n
apply
HasColimit.mk ⟨_, extendCofanIsColimit f (colimit.isColimit _) (colimit.isColimit _)⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Constructions/FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts.lean | 245 | 249 | theorem hasFiniteCoproducts_of_has_binary_and_initial : HasFiniteCoproducts C := by |
refine ⟨fun n => ⟨fun K => ?_⟩⟩
letI := hasCoproduct_fin n fun n => K.obj ⟨n⟩
let that : K ≅ Discrete.functor fun n => K.obj ⟨n⟩ := Discrete.natIso fun ⟨i⟩ => Iso.refl _
apply @hasColimitOfIso _ _ _ _ _ _ this that
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.BinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.RegularMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroMorphisms
#align_import category_theory.limits.mono_coprod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
universe u
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Limits
variable (C : Type*) [Category C]
class MonoCoprod : Prop where
binaryCofan_inl : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (c : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c), Mono c.inl
#align category_theory.limits.mono_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.MonoCoprod
variable {C}
instance (priority := 100) monoCoprodOfHasZeroMorphisms [HasZeroMorphisms C] : MonoCoprod C :=
⟨fun A B c hc => by
haveI : IsSplitMono c.inl :=
IsSplitMono.mk' (SplitMono.mk (hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (𝟙 A) 0)) (IsColimit.fac _ _ _))
infer_instance⟩
#align category_theory.limits.mono_coprod_of_has_zero_morphisms CategoryTheory.Limits.monoCoprodOfHasZeroMorphisms
namespace MonoCoprod
theorem binaryCofan_inr {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] (c : BinaryCofan A B) (hc : IsColimit c) :
Mono c.inr := by
haveI hc' : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f₁ f₂ => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk f₂ f₁))
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
(fun f₁ f₂ m h₁ h₂ => BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat))
exact binaryCofan_inl _ hc'
#align category_theory.limits.mono_coprod.binary_cofan_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.MonoCoprod.binaryCofan_inr
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inl : A ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inl _ (colimit.isColimit _)
instance {A B : C} [MonoCoprod C] [HasBinaryCoproduct A B] : Mono (coprod.inr : B ⟶ A ⨿ B) :=
binaryCofan_inr _ (colimit.isColimit _)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/MonoCoprod.lean | 78 | 87 | theorem mono_inl_iff {A B : C} {c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B} (hc₁ : IsColimit c₁) (hc₂ : IsColimit c₂) :
Mono c₁.inl ↔ Mono c₂.inl := by |
suffices
∀ (c₁ c₂ : BinaryCofan A B) (_ : IsColimit c₁) (_ : IsColimit c₂) (_ : Mono c₁.inl),
Mono c₂.inl
by exact ⟨fun h₁ => this _ _ hc₁ hc₂ h₁, fun h₂ => this _ _ hc₂ hc₁ h₂⟩
intro c₁ c₂ hc₁ hc₂
intro
simpa only [IsColimit.comp_coconePointUniqueUpToIso_hom] using
mono_comp c₁.inl (hc₁.coconePointUniqueUpToIso hc₂).hom
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Expand
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.witt_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c3019c79074b0619edb4b27553a91b2e82242395"
open MvPolynomial
open Finset hiding map
open Finsupp (single)
--attribute [-simp] coe_eval₂_hom
variable (p : ℕ)
variable (R : Type*) [CommRing R] [DecidableEq R]
noncomputable def wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ R :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), monomial (single i (p ^ (n - i))) ((p : R) ^ i)
#align witt_polynomial wittPolynomial
theorem wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) :
wittPolynomial p R n = ∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), C ((p : R) ^ i) * X i ^ p ^ (n - i) := by
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i -
rw [monomial_eq, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
rw [pow_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align witt_polynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow
-- Notation with ring of coefficients explicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W_" => wittPolynomial p
-- Notation with ring of coefficients implicit
set_option quotPrecheck false in
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Witt] notation "W" => wittPolynomial p _
open Witt
open MvPolynomial
section
variable {R} {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem map_wittPolynomial (f : R →+* S) (n : ℕ) : map f (W n) = W n := by
rw [wittPolynomial, map_sum, wittPolynomial]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [map_monomial, RingHom.map_pow, map_natCast]
#align map_witt_polynomial map_wittPolynomial
variable (R)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/WittPolynomial.lean | 125 | 132 | theorem constantCoeff_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
constantCoeff (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by |
simp only [wittPolynomial, map_sum, constantCoeff_monomial]
rw [sum_eq_zero]
rintro i _
rw [if_neg]
rw [Finsupp.single_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_gt (pow_pos hp.1.pos _)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.EqLocus
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Idempotents
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
#align_import linear_algebra.span from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10878f6bf1dab863445907ab23fbfcefcb5845d0"
variable {R R₂ K M M₂ V S : Type*}
namespace Submodule
open Function Set
open Pointwise
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {x : M} (p p' : Submodule R M)
variable [Semiring R₂] {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
section
variable (R)
def span (s : Set M) : Submodule R M :=
sInf { p | s ⊆ p }
#align submodule.span Submodule.span
variable {R}
-- Porting note: renamed field to `principal'` and added `principal` to fix explicit argument
@[mk_iff]
class IsPrincipal (S : Submodule R M) : Prop where
principal' : ∃ a, S = span R {a}
#align submodule.is_principal Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem IsPrincipal.principal (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
∃ a, S = span R {a} :=
Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal'
#align submodule.is_principal.principal Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal
end
variable {s t : Set M}
theorem mem_span : x ∈ span R s ↔ ∀ p : Submodule R M, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_iInter₂
#align submodule.mem_span Submodule.mem_span
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_span : s ⊆ span R s := fun _ h => mem_span.2 fun _ hp => hp h
#align submodule.subset_span Submodule.subset_span
theorem span_le {p} : span R s ≤ p ↔ s ⊆ p :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_span, fun ss _ h => mem_span.1 h _ ss⟩
#align submodule.span_le Submodule.span_le
theorem span_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : span R s ≤ span R t :=
span_le.2 <| Subset.trans h subset_span
#align submodule.span_mono Submodule.span_mono
theorem span_monotone : Monotone (span R : Set M → Submodule R M) := fun _ _ => span_mono
#align submodule.span_monotone Submodule.span_monotone
theorem span_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ p) (h₂ : p ≤ span R s) : span R s = p :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align submodule.span_eq_of_le Submodule.span_eq_of_le
theorem span_eq : span R (p : Set M) = p :=
span_eq_of_le _ (Subset.refl _) subset_span
#align submodule.span_eq Submodule.span_eq
theorem span_eq_span (hs : s ⊆ span R t) (ht : t ⊆ span R s) : span R s = span R t :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 hs) (span_le.2 ht)
#align submodule.span_eq_span Submodule.span_eq_span
lemma coe_span_eq_self [SetLike S M] [AddSubmonoidClass S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] (s : S) :
(span R (s : Set M) : Set M) = s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ subset_span
let s' : Submodule R M :=
{ carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem }
exact span_le (p := s') |>.mpr le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem span_coe_eq_restrictScalars [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
span S (p : Set M) = p.restrictScalars S :=
span_eq (p.restrictScalars S)
#align submodule.span_coe_eq_restrict_scalars Submodule.span_coe_eq_restrictScalars
theorem image_span_subset (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
f '' span R s ⊆ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_subset_iff.trans <| span_le (p := N.comap f)
theorem image_span_subset_span (f : F) (s : Set M) : f '' span R s ⊆ span R₂ (f '' s) :=
(image_span_subset f s _).2 fun x hx ↦ subset_span ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem map_span [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) :
(span R s).map f = span R₂ (f '' s) :=
Eq.symm <| span_eq_of_le _ (Set.image_subset f subset_span) (image_span_subset_span f s)
#align submodule.map_span Submodule.map_span
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span := Submodule.map_span
#align linear_map.map_span LinearMap.map_span
theorem map_span_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (span R s) ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_span_subset f s N
#align submodule.map_span_le Submodule.map_span_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span_le := Submodule.map_span_le
#align linear_map.map_span_le LinearMap.map_span_le
@[simp]
theorem span_insert_zero : span R (insert (0 : M) s) = span R s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono (Set.subset_insert 0 s))
rw [span_le, Set.insert_subset_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem], Submodule.subset_span⟩
#align submodule.span_insert_zero Submodule.span_insert_zero
-- See also `span_preimage_eq` below.
theorem span_preimage_le (f : F) (s : Set M₂) :
span R (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (span R₂ s).comap f := by
rw [span_le, comap_coe]
exact preimage_mono subset_span
#align submodule.span_preimage_le Submodule.span_preimage_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.span_preimage_le := Submodule.span_preimage_le
#align linear_map.span_preimage_le LinearMap.span_preimage_le
theorem closure_subset_span {s : Set M} : (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) ⊆ span R s :=
(@AddSubmonoid.closure_le _ _ _ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid).mpr subset_span
#align submodule.closure_subset_span Submodule.closure_subset_span
theorem closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span {s : Set M} :
AddSubmonoid.closure s ≤ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid :=
closure_subset_span
#align submodule.closure_le_to_add_submonoid_span Submodule.closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span
@[simp]
theorem span_closure {s : Set M} : span R (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) = span R s :=
le_antisymm (span_le.mpr closure_subset_span) (span_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure)
#align submodule.span_closure Submodule.span_closure
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul : ∀ (a : R) (x), p x → p (a • x)) : p x :=
((@span_le (p := ⟨⟨⟨p, by intros x y; exact add x y⟩, zero⟩, smul⟩)) s).2 mem h
#align submodule.span_induction Submodule.span_induction
theorem span_induction₂ {p : M → M → Prop} {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R s)
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R s) (mem_mem : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, p x y)
(zero_left : ∀ y, p 0 y) (zero_right : ∀ x, p x 0)
(add_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(add_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(smul_left : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p (r • x) y)
(smul_right : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p x (r • y)) : p a b :=
Submodule.span_induction ha
(fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hb (mem_mem x hx) (zero_right x) (add_right x) fun r =>
smul_right r x)
(zero_left b) (fun x₁ x₂ => add_left x₁ x₂ b) fun r x => smul_left r x b
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_span h))
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ‹_›)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
refine
span_induction hx (fun m hm => ⟨subset_span hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy =>
Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx =>
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy => ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx => Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx => ⟨smul_mem _ _ hx', smul r _ _ hx⟩
#align submodule.span_induction' Submodule.span_induction'
open AddSubmonoid in
theorem span_eq_closure {s : Set M} : (span R s).toAddSubmonoid = closure (@univ R • s) := by
refine le_antisymm
(fun x hx ↦ span_induction hx (fun x hx ↦ subset_closure ⟨1, trivial, x, hx, one_smul R x⟩)
(zero_mem _) (fun _ _ ↦ add_mem) fun r m hm ↦ closure_induction hm ?_ ?_ fun _ _ h h' ↦ ?_)
(closure_le.2 ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hm)
· rintro _ ⟨r', -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact subset_closure ⟨r * r', trivial, m, hm, mul_smul r r' m⟩
· rw [smul_zero]; apply zero_mem
· rw [smul_add]; exact add_mem h h'
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul_mem : ∀ r : R, ∀ x ∈ s, p (r • x)) : p x := by
rw [← mem_toAddSubmonoid, span_eq_closure] at h
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_induction h ?_ zero add
rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem r m hm
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul_mem : ∀ (r x) (h : x ∈ s), p (r • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span h)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) ↦ hc
refine closure_induction hx ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy ↦ Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx ↦
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy ↦ ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx ↦ ⟨Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hx), smul_mem r x hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem span_span_coe_preimage : span R (((↑) : span R s → M) ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x ↦ Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ ↦ by
refine span_induction' (p := fun x hx ↦ (⟨x, hx⟩ : span R s) ∈ span R (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s))
(fun x' hx' ↦ subset_span hx') ?_ (fun x _ y _ ↦ ?_) (fun r x _ ↦ ?_) hx
· exact zero_mem _
· exact add_mem
· exact smul_mem _ _
#align submodule.span_span_coe_preimage Submodule.span_span_coe_preimage
@[simp]
lemma span_setOf_mem_eq_top :
span R {x : span R s | (x : M) ∈ s} = ⊤ :=
span_span_coe_preimage
theorem span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure (s : Set M) :
(span ℕ s).toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure s := by
refine Eq.symm (AddSubmonoid.closure_eq_of_le subset_span ?_)
apply (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection (AddSubmonoid.toNatSubmodule (M := M)).symm).l_le
(a := span ℕ s) (b := AddSubmonoid.closure s)
rw [span_le]
exact AddSubmonoid.subset_closure
#align submodule.span_nat_eq_add_submonoid_closure Submodule.span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_nat_eq (s : AddSubmonoid M) : (span ℕ (s : Set M)).toAddSubmonoid = s := by
rw [span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_nat_eq Submodule.span_nat_eq
theorem span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : Set M) :
(span ℤ s).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.closure s :=
Eq.symm <|
AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le _ subset_span fun x hx =>
span_induction hx (fun x hx => AddSubgroup.subset_closure hx) (AddSubgroup.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ => AddSubgroup.add_mem _) fun _ _ _ => AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem _ ‹_› _
#align submodule.span_int_eq_add_subgroup_closure Submodule.span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_int_eq {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : AddSubgroup M) :
(span ℤ (s : Set M)).toAddSubgroup = s := by rw [span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_int_eq Submodule.span_int_eq
section
variable (R M)
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@span R M _ _ _) (↑) where
choice s _ := span R s
gc _ _ := span_le
le_l_u _ := subset_span
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align submodule.gi Submodule.gi
end
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : span R (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_bot
#align submodule.span_empty Submodule.span_empty
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : span R (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_span
#align submodule.span_univ Submodule.span_univ
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : span R (s ∪ t) = span R s ⊔ span R t :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_sup
#align submodule.span_union Submodule.span_union
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : span R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span R (s i) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup
#align submodule.span_Union Submodule.span_iUnion
theorem span_iUnion₂ {ι} {κ : ι → Sort*} (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set M) :
span R (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), span R (s i j) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup₂
#align submodule.span_Union₂ Submodule.span_iUnion₂
theorem span_attach_biUnion [DecidableEq M] {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : s → Finset M) :
span R (s.attach.biUnion f : Set M) = ⨆ x, span R (f x) := by simp [span_iUnion]
#align submodule.span_attach_bUnion Submodule.span_attach_biUnion
theorem sup_span : p ⊔ span R s = span R (p ∪ s) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.sup_span Submodule.sup_span
theorem span_sup : span R s ⊔ p = span R (s ∪ p) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.span_sup Submodule.span_sup
notation:1000
R " ∙ " x => span R (singleton x)
theorem span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans (s : Set M) : span R s = ⨆ x ∈ s, R ∙ x := by
simp only [← span_iUnion, Set.biUnion_of_singleton s]
#align submodule.span_eq_supr_of_singleton_spans Submodule.span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans
theorem span_range_eq_iSup {ι : Sort*} {v : ι → M} : span R (range v) = ⨆ i, R ∙ v i := by
rw [span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans, iSup_range]
#align submodule.span_range_eq_supr Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup
theorem span_smul_le (s : Set M) (r : R) : span R (r • s) ≤ span R s := by
rw [span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem (span R s) r (subset_span hx)
#align submodule.span_smul_le Submodule.span_smul_le
theorem subset_span_trans {U V W : Set M} (hUV : U ⊆ Submodule.span R V)
(hVW : V ⊆ Submodule.span R W) : U ⊆ Submodule.span R W :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.le_u_l_trans hUV hVW
#align submodule.subset_span_trans Submodule.subset_span_trans
theorem span_smul_eq_of_isUnit (s : Set M) (r : R) (hr : IsUnit r) : span R (r • s) = span R s := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply span_smul_le
· convert span_smul_le (r • s) ((hr.unit⁻¹ : _) : R)
rw [smul_smul]
erw [hr.unit.inv_val]
rw [one_smul]
#align submodule.span_smul_eq_of_is_unit Submodule.span_smul_eq_of_isUnit
@[simp]
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] (S : ι → Submodule R M)
(H : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) : ((iSup S: Submodule R M) : Set M) = ⋃ i, S i :=
let s : Submodule R M :=
{ __ := AddSubmonoid.copy _ _ (AddSubmonoid.coe_iSup_of_directed H).symm
smul_mem' := fun r _ hx ↦ have ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp hx
Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨i, (S i).smul_mem' r hi⟩ }
have : iSup S = s := le_antisymm
(iSup_le fun i ↦ le_iSup (fun i ↦ (S i : Set M)) i) (Set.iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ le_iSup S _)
this.symm ▸ rfl
#align submodule.coe_supr_of_directed Submodule.coe_iSup_of_directed
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] (S : ι → Submodule R M) (H : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) {x} :
x ∈ iSup S ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup_of_directed S H, mem_iUnion]
rfl
#align submodule.mem_supr_of_directed Submodule.mem_iSup_of_directed
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Span.lean | 396 | 400 | theorem mem_sSup_of_directed {s : Set (Submodule R M)} {z} (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) : z ∈ sSup s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, z ∈ y := by |
have : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp only [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed _ hdir.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk,
exists_prop]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
#align polynomial.roots Polynomial.roots
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
-- porting noteL `‹_›` doesn't work for instance arguments
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
#align polynomial.roots_def Polynomial.roots_def
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align polynomial.roots_zero Polynomial.roots_zero
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
#align polynomial.card_roots Polynomial.card_roots
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
#align polynomial.card_roots' Polynomial.card_roots'
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C'
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
#align polynomial.count_roots Polynomial.count_roots
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
#align polynomial.mem_roots' Polynomial.mem_roots'
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
#align polynomial.mem_roots Polynomial.mem_roots
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots Polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
#align polynomial.is_root_of_mem_roots Polynomial.isRoot_of_mem_roots
-- Porting note: added during port.
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots w, IsRoot.def, aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
Z.card ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
#align polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots Polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align polynomial.finite_set_of_is_root Polynomial.finite_setOf_isRoot
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_is_root Polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_max_root Polynomial.exists_max_root
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_min_root Polynomial.exists_min_root
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq Polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
#align polynomial.roots_mul Polynomial.roots_mul
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
#align polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd Polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C'
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X Polynomial.roots_X
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C Polynomial.roots_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
#align polynomial.roots_one Polynomial.roots_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 212 | 215 | theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by |
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Supported
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Truncated
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.mul_coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
namespace WittVector
variable (p : ℕ) [hp : Fact p.Prime]
variable {k : Type*} [CommRing k]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
-- Porting note: new notation
local notation "𝕄" => MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ
open Finset MvPolynomial
def wittPolyProd (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) *
rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod WittVector.wittPolyProd
theorem wittPolyProd_vars (n : ℕ) : (wittPolyProd p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [wittPolyProd]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_rename _ _) ?_
simp [wittPolynomial_vars, image_subset_iff]
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_vars WittVector.wittPolyProd_vars
def wittPolyProdRemainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
∑ i ∈ range n, (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i)
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder
theorem wittPolyProdRemainder_vars (n : ℕ) :
(wittPolyProdRemainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range n := by
rw [wittPolyProdRemainder]
refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
have : (p : 𝕄) = C (p : ℤ) := by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast]
rw [this, vars_C]
apply empty_subset
· apply Subset.trans (vars_pow _ _)
apply Subset.trans (wittMul_vars _ _)
apply product_subset_product (Subset.refl _)
simp only [mem_range, range_subset] at hx ⊢
exact hx
#align witt_vector.witt_poly_prod_remainder_vars WittVector.wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
def remainder (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
(∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 0)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))) *
∑ x ∈ range (n + 1),
(rename (Prod.mk 1)) ((monomial (Finsupp.single x (p ^ (n + 1 - x)))) ((p : ℤ) ^ x))
#align witt_vector.remainder WittVector.remainder
theorem remainder_vars (n : ℕ) : (remainder p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [remainder]
apply Subset.trans (vars_mul _ _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_ <;>
· refine Subset.trans (vars_sum_subset _ _) ?_
rw [biUnion_subset]
intro x hx
rw [rename_monomial, vars_monomial, Finsupp.mapDomain_single]
· apply Subset.trans Finsupp.support_single_subset
simpa using mem_range.mp hx
· apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
#align witt_vector.remainder_vars WittVector.remainder_vars
def polyOfInterest (n : ℕ) : 𝕄 :=
wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1))
#align witt_vector.poly_of_interest WittVector.polyOfInterest
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), (p : 𝕄) ^ i * wittMul p i ^ p ^ (n - i) = wittPolyProd p n := by
simp only [wittPolyProd]
convert wittStructureInt_prop p (X (0 : Fin 2) * X 1) n using 1
· simp only [wittPolynomial, wittMul]
rw [AlgHom.map_sum]
congr 1 with i
congr 1
have hsupp : (Finsupp.single i (p ^ (n - i))).support = {i} := by
rw [Finsupp.support_eq_singleton]
simp only [and_true_iff, Finsupp.single_eq_same, eq_self_iff_true, Ne]
exact pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero
simp only [bind₁_monomial, hsupp, Int.cast_natCast, prod_singleton, eq_intCast,
Finsupp.single_eq_same, C_pow, mul_eq_mul_left_iff, true_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true,
Int.cast_pow]
· simp only [map_mul, bind₁_X_right]
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux1 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux1
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux2 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ n * wittMul p n + wittPolyProdRemainder p n = wittPolyProd p n := by
convert mul_polyOfInterest_aux1 p n
rw [sum_range_succ, add_comm, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, pow_one]
rfl
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux2 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux2
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 (n : ℕ) : wittPolyProd p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
remainder p n := by
-- a useful auxiliary fact
have mvpz : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = MvPolynomial.C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
-- Porting note: the original proof applies `sum_range_succ` through a non-`conv` rewrite,
-- but this does not work in Lean 4; the whole proof also times out very badly. The proof has been
-- nearly totally rewritten here and now finishes quite fast.
rw [wittPolyProd, wittPolynomial, AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_sum]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_lhs =>
arg 2
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
conv_rhs =>
enter [1, 2, 2]
rw [sum_range_succ, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, tsub_self, pow_zero, pow_one, map_mul,
rename_C, rename_X, ← mvpz]
simp only [add_mul, mul_add]
rw [add_comm _ (remainder p n)]
simp only [add_assoc]
apply congrArg (Add.add _)
ring
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux3 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux3
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * wittMul p (n + 1) =
-((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1)) * ((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) +
(remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1)) := by
rw [← add_sub_assoc, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, mul_polyOfInterest_aux2]
exact mul_polyOfInterest_aux3 _ _
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux4 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux4
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_aux5 (n : ℕ) :
(p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n = remainder p n - wittPolyProdRemainder p (n + 1) := by
simp only [polyOfInterest, mul_sub, mul_add, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux4 p n]
ring
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_aux5 WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_aux5
theorem mul_polyOfInterest_vars (n : ℕ) :
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * polyOfInterest p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by
rw [mul_polyOfInterest_aux5]
apply Subset.trans (vars_sub_subset _)
refine union_subset ?_ ?_
· apply remainder_vars
· apply wittPolyProdRemainder_vars
#align witt_vector.mul_poly_of_interest_vars WittVector.mul_polyOfInterest_vars
theorem polyOfInterest_vars_eq (n : ℕ) : (polyOfInterest p n).vars =
((p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * (wittMul p (n + 1) + (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) * X (0, n + 1) * X (1, n + 1) -
X (0, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)) -
X (1, n + 1) * rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n + 1)))).vars := by
have : (p : 𝕄) ^ (n + 1) = C ((p : ℤ) ^ (n + 1)) := by norm_cast
rw [polyOfInterest, this, vars_C_mul]
apply pow_ne_zero
exact mod_cast hp.out.ne_zero
#align witt_vector.poly_of_interest_vars_eq WittVector.polyOfInterest_vars_eq
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/MulCoeff.lean | 215 | 216 | theorem polyOfInterest_vars (n : ℕ) : (polyOfInterest p n).vars ⊆ univ ×ˢ range (n + 1) := by |
rw [polyOfInterest_vars_eq]; apply mul_polyOfInterest_vars
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Range
#align_import data.multiset.nodup from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
namespace Multiset
open Function List
variable {α β γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s t : Multiset α} {a : α}
-- nodup
def Nodup (s : Multiset α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s List.Nodup fun _ _ p => propext p.nodup_iff
#align multiset.nodup Multiset.Nodup
@[simp]
theorem coe_nodup {l : List α} : @Nodup α l ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
#align multiset.coe_nodup Multiset.coe_nodup
@[simp]
theorem nodup_zero : @Nodup α 0 :=
Pairwise.nil
#align multiset.nodup_zero Multiset.nodup_zero
@[simp]
theorem nodup_cons {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : Nodup (a ::ₘ s) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Nodup s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ => List.nodup_cons
#align multiset.nodup_cons Multiset.nodup_cons
theorem Nodup.cons (m : a ∉ s) (n : Nodup s) : Nodup (a ::ₘ s) :=
nodup_cons.2 ⟨m, n⟩
#align multiset.nodup.cons Multiset.Nodup.cons
@[simp]
theorem nodup_singleton : ∀ a : α, Nodup ({a} : Multiset α) :=
List.nodup_singleton
#align multiset.nodup_singleton Multiset.nodup_singleton
theorem Nodup.of_cons (h : Nodup (a ::ₘ s)) : Nodup s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).2
#align multiset.nodup.of_cons Multiset.Nodup.of_cons
theorem Nodup.not_mem (h : Nodup (a ::ₘ s)) : a ∉ s :=
(nodup_cons.1 h).1
#align multiset.nodup.not_mem Multiset.Nodup.not_mem
theorem nodup_of_le {s t : Multiset α} (h : s ≤ t) : Nodup t → Nodup s :=
Multiset.leInductionOn h fun {_ _} => Nodup.sublist
#align multiset.nodup_of_le Multiset.nodup_of_le
theorem not_nodup_pair : ∀ a : α, ¬Nodup (a ::ₘ a ::ₘ 0) :=
List.not_nodup_pair
#align multiset.not_nodup_pair Multiset.not_nodup_pair
theorem nodup_iff_le {s : Multiset α} : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a : α, ¬a ::ₘ a ::ₘ 0 ≤ s :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _ =>
nodup_iff_sublist.trans <| forall_congr' fun a => not_congr (@replicate_le_coe _ a 2 _).symm
#align multiset.nodup_iff_le Multiset.nodup_iff_le
theorem nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons {s : Multiset α} : s.Nodup ↔ ∀ a t, s ≠ a ::ₘ a ::ₘ t :=
nodup_iff_le.trans
⟨fun h a t s_eq => h a (s_eq.symm ▸ cons_le_cons a (cons_le_cons a (zero_le _))), fun h a le =>
let ⟨t, s_eq⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp le
h a t (by rwa [cons_add, cons_add, zero_add] at s_eq)⟩
#align multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons Multiset.nodup_iff_ne_cons_cons
theorem nodup_iff_count_le_one [DecidableEq α] {s : Multiset α} : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a, count a s ≤ 1 :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', coe_nodup, mem_coe, coe_count]
exact List.nodup_iff_count_le_one
#align multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one Multiset.nodup_iff_count_le_one
theorem nodup_iff_count_eq_one [DecidableEq α] : Nodup s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, count a s = 1 :=
Quot.induction_on s fun _l => by simpa using List.nodup_iff_count_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem count_eq_one_of_mem [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (d : Nodup s) (h : a ∈ s) :
count a s = 1 :=
nodup_iff_count_eq_one.mp d a h
#align multiset.count_eq_one_of_mem Multiset.count_eq_one_of_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Nodup.lean | 96 | 100 | theorem count_eq_of_nodup [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Multiset α} (d : Nodup s) :
count a s = if a ∈ s then 1 else 0 := by |
split_ifs with h
· exact count_eq_one_of_mem d h
· exact count_eq_zero_of_not_mem h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
#align_import combinatorics.additive.pluennecke_ruzsa from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4aab2abced69a9e579b1e6dc2856ed3db48e2cbd"
open Nat
open NNRat Pointwise
namespace Finset
variable {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] [DecidableEq α] {A B C : Finset α}
@[to_additive card_sub_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_sub
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Subtraction version."]
theorem card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div (A B C : Finset α) :
(A / C).card * B.card ≤ (A / B).card * (B / C).card := by
rw [← card_product (A / B), ← mul_one ((A / B) ×ˢ (B / C)).card]
refine card_mul_le_card_mul (fun b ac ↦ ac.1 * ac.2 = b) (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
fun x _ ↦ card_le_one_iff.2 fun hu hv ↦
((mem_bipartiteBelow _).1 hu).2.symm.trans ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, c, hc, rfl⟩ := mem_div.1 hx
refine card_le_card_of_inj_on (fun b ↦ (a / b, b / c)) (fun b hb ↦ ?_) fun b₁ _ b₂ _ h ↦ ?_
· rw [mem_bipartiteAbove]
exact ⟨mk_mem_product (div_mem_div ha hb) (div_mem_div hb hc), div_mul_div_cancel' _ _ _⟩
· exact div_right_injective (Prod.ext_iff.1 h).1
· exact ((mem_bipartiteBelow _).1 hv).2
#align finset.card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div Finset.card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div
#align finset.card_sub_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_sub Finset.card_sub_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_sub
@[to_additive card_sub_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_add
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-add-add version."]
theorem card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul (A B C : Finset α) :
(A / C).card * B.card ≤ (A * B).card * (B * C).card := by
rw [← div_inv_eq_mul, ← card_inv B, ← card_inv (B * C), mul_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div _ _ _
#align finset.card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul Finset.card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul
#align finset.card_sub_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_add Finset.card_sub_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_add
@[to_additive card_add_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_add
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-sub-sub version."]
theorem card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul (A B C : Finset α) :
(A * C).card * B.card ≤ (A / B).card * (B * C).card := by
rw [← div_inv_eq_mul, ← div_inv_eq_mul B]
exact card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div _ _ _
#align finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul Finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul
#align finset.card_add_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_add Finset.card_add_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_add
@[to_additive card_add_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_sub
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-add-sub version."]
theorem card_mul_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div (A B C : Finset α) :
(A * C).card * B.card ≤ (A * B).card * (B / C).card := by
rw [← div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv B]
exact card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul _ _ _
#align finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div Finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div
#align finset.card_add_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_sub Finset.card_add_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_sub
set_option backward.isDefEq.lazyWhnfCore false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12534
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_pluennecke_petridis (C : Finset α)
(hA : ∀ A' ⊆ A, (A * B).card * A'.card ≤ (A' * B).card * A.card) :
(A * B * C).card * A.card ≤ (A * B).card * (A * C).card := by
induction' C using Finset.induction_on with x C _ ih
· simp
set A' := A ∩ (A * C / {x}) with hA'
set C' := insert x C with hC'
have h₀ : A' * {x} = A * {x} ∩ (A * C) := by
rw [hA', inter_mul_singleton, (isUnit_singleton x).div_mul_cancel]
have h₁ : A * B * C' = A * B * C ∪ (A * B * {x}) \ (A' * B * {x}) := by
rw [hC', insert_eq, union_comm, mul_union]
refine (sup_sdiff_eq_sup ?_).symm
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_right_comm A, h₀]
exact mul_subset_mul_right inter_subset_right
have h₂ : A' * B * {x} ⊆ A * B * {x} :=
mul_subset_mul_right (mul_subset_mul_right inter_subset_left)
have h₃ : (A * B * C').card ≤ (A * B * C).card + (A * B).card - (A' * B).card := by
rw [h₁]
refine (card_union_le _ _).trans_eq ?_
rw [card_sdiff h₂, ← add_tsub_assoc_of_le (card_le_card h₂), card_mul_singleton,
card_mul_singleton]
refine (mul_le_mul_right' h₃ _).trans ?_
rw [tsub_mul, add_mul]
refine (tsub_le_tsub (add_le_add_right ih _) <| hA _ inter_subset_left).trans_eq ?_
rw [← mul_add, ← mul_tsub, ← hA', hC', insert_eq, mul_union, ← card_mul_singleton A x, ←
card_mul_singleton A' x, add_comm (card _), h₀,
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (card_union_add_card_inter _ _)]
#align finset.mul_pluennecke_petridis Finset.mul_pluennecke_petridis
#align finset.add_pluennecke_petridis Finset.add_pluennecke_petridis
-- Auxiliary lemma for Ruzsa's triangle sum inequality, and the Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality.
@[to_additive]
private theorem mul_aux (hA : A.Nonempty) (hAB : A ⊆ B)
(h : ∀ A' ∈ B.powerset.erase ∅, ((A * C).card : ℚ≥0) / ↑A.card ≤ (A' * C).card / ↑A'.card) :
∀ A' ⊆ A, (A * C).card * A'.card ≤ (A' * C).card * A.card := by
rintro A' hAA'
obtain rfl | hA' := A'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
have hA₀ : (0 : ℚ≥0) < A.card := cast_pos.2 hA.card_pos
have hA₀' : (0 : ℚ≥0) < A'.card := cast_pos.2 hA'.card_pos
exact mod_cast
(div_le_div_iff hA₀ hA₀').1
(h _ <| mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hA'.ne_empty <| mem_powerset.2 <| hAA'.trans hAB)
@[to_additive card_add_mul_card_le_card_add_mul_card_add
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Addition version."]
theorem card_mul_mul_card_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul (A B C : Finset α) :
(A * C).card * B.card ≤ (A * B).card * (B * C).card := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
have hB' : B ∈ B.powerset.erase ∅ := mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hB.ne_empty (mem_powerset_self _)
obtain ⟨U, hU, hUA⟩ :=
exists_min_image (B.powerset.erase ∅) (fun U ↦ (U * A).card / U.card : _ → ℚ≥0) ⟨B, hB'⟩
rw [mem_erase, mem_powerset, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hU
refine cast_le.1 (?_ : (_ : ℚ≥0) ≤ _)
push_cast
refine (le_div_iff <| cast_pos.2 hB.card_pos).1 ?_
rw [mul_div_right_comm, mul_comm _ B]
refine (Nat.cast_le.2 <| card_le_card_mul_left _ hU.1).trans ?_
refine le_trans ?_
(mul_le_mul (hUA _ hB') (cast_le.2 <| card_le_card <| mul_subset_mul_right hU.2)
(zero_le _) (zero_le _))
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, ← mul_assoc]
refine (le_div_iff <| cast_pos.2 hU.1.card_pos).2 ?_
exact mod_cast mul_pluennecke_petridis C (mul_aux hU.1 hU.2 hUA)
#align finset.card_mul_mul_card_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul Finset.card_mul_mul_card_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul
#align finset.card_add_mul_card_le_card_add_mul_card_add Finset.card_add_mul_card_le_card_add_mul_card_add
@[to_additive card_add_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_sub
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Add-sub-sub version."]
theorem card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div (A B C : Finset α) :
(A * C).card * B.card ≤ (A / B).card * (B / C).card := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ← card_inv B, ← card_inv (B / C), inv_div', div_inv_eq_mul]
exact card_mul_mul_card_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul _ _ _
#align finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div Finset.card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div
@[to_additive card_sub_mul_le_card_add_mul_card_sub
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-add-sub version."]
theorem card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div (A B C : Finset α) :
(A / C).card * B.card ≤ (A * B).card * (B / C).card := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact card_mul_mul_card_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul _ _ _
#align finset.card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div Finset.card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_div
@[to_additive card_sub_mul_le_card_sub_mul_card_add
"**Ruzsa's triangle inequality**. Sub-sub-add version."]
theorem card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul (A B C : Finset α) :
(A / C).card * B.card ≤ (A / B).card * (B * C).card := by
rw [← div_inv_eq_mul, div_eq_mul_inv]
exact card_mul_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_div _ _ _
#align finset.card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul Finset.card_div_mul_le_card_div_mul_card_mul
theorem card_add_nsmul_le {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [DecidableEq α] {A B : Finset α}
(hAB : ∀ A' ⊆ A, (A + B).card * A'.card ≤ (A' + B).card * A.card) (n : ℕ) :
(A + n • B).card ≤ ((A + B).card / A.card : ℚ≥0) ^ n * A.card := by
obtain rfl | hA := A.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul', ← add_assoc, _root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, ← mul_div_right_comm, le_div_iff,
← cast_mul]
swap
· exact cast_pos.2 hA.card_pos
refine (Nat.cast_le.2 <| add_pluennecke_petridis _ hAB).trans ?_
rw [cast_mul]
gcongr
#align finset.card_add_nsmul_le Finset.card_add_nsmul_le
@[to_additive existing]
theorem card_mul_pow_le (hAB : ∀ A' ⊆ A, (A * B).card * A'.card ≤ (A' * B).card * A.card)
(n : ℕ) : (A * B ^ n).card ≤ ((A * B).card / A.card : ℚ≥0) ^ n * A.card := by
obtain rfl | hA := A.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [_root_.pow_succ', ← mul_assoc, _root_.pow_succ', @mul_assoc ℚ≥0, ← mul_div_right_comm,
le_div_iff, ← cast_mul]
swap
· exact cast_pos.2 hA.card_pos
refine (Nat.cast_le.2 <| mul_pluennecke_petridis _ hAB).trans ?_
rw [cast_mul]
gcongr
#align finset.card_mul_pow_le Finset.card_mul_pow_le
@[to_additive "The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Addition version. Note that this is genuinely
harder than the subtraction version because we cannot use a double counting argument."]
theorem card_pow_div_pow_le (hA : A.Nonempty) (B : Finset α) (m n : ℕ) :
((B ^ m / B ^ n).card) ≤ ((A * B).card / A.card : ℚ≥0) ^ (m + n) * A.card := by
have hA' : A ∈ A.powerset.erase ∅ := mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem hA.ne_empty (mem_powerset_self _)
obtain ⟨C, hC, hCA⟩ :=
exists_min_image (A.powerset.erase ∅) (fun C ↦ (C * B).card / C.card : _ → ℚ≥0) ⟨A, hA'⟩
rw [mem_erase, mem_powerset, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hC
refine (mul_le_mul_right <| cast_pos.2 hC.1.card_pos).1 ?_
norm_cast
refine (Nat.cast_le.2 <| card_div_mul_le_card_mul_mul_card_mul _ _ _).trans ?_
push_cast
rw [mul_comm _ C]
refine (mul_le_mul (card_mul_pow_le (mul_aux hC.1 hC.2 hCA) _)
(card_mul_pow_le (mul_aux hC.1 hC.2 hCA) _) (zero_le _) (zero_le _)).trans ?_
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← pow_add, ← mul_assoc]
gcongr ((?_ ^ _) * Nat.cast ?_) * _
· exact hCA _ hA'
· exact card_le_card hC.2
#align finset.card_pow_div_pow_le Finset.card_pow_div_pow_le
#align finset.card_nsmul_sub_nsmul_le Finset.card_nsmul_sub_nsmul_le
@[to_additive "The **Plünnecke-Ruzsa inequality**. Subtraction version."]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/PluenneckeRuzsa.lean | 249 | 252 | theorem card_pow_div_pow_le' (hA : A.Nonempty) (B : Finset α) (m n : ℕ) :
(B ^ m / B ^ n).card ≤ ((A / B).card / A.card : ℚ≥0) ^ (m + n) * A.card := by |
rw [← card_inv, inv_div', ← inv_pow, ← inv_pow, div_eq_mul_inv A]
exact card_pow_div_pow_le hA _ _ _
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Order.Bounded
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.PartENat
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.ordinal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7c2ce0c2da15516b4e65d0c9e254bb6dc93abd1f"
noncomputable section
open Function Set Cardinal Equiv Order Ordinal
open scoped Classical
universe u v w
namespace Cardinal
section UsingOrdinals
theorem ord_isLimit {c} (co : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : (ord c).IsLimit := by
refine ⟨fun h => aleph0_ne_zero ?_, fun a => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ord_le] at h
simpa only [card_zero, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] using co.trans h
· rw [ord_le] at h ⊢
rwa [← @add_one_of_aleph0_le (card a), ← card_succ]
rw [← ord_le, ← le_succ_of_isLimit, ord_le]
· exact co.trans h
· rw [ord_aleph0]
exact omega_isLimit
#align cardinal.ord_is_limit Cardinal.ord_isLimit
theorem noMaxOrder {c} (h : ℵ₀ ≤ c) : NoMaxOrder c.ord.out.α :=
Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt (ord_isLimit h).2
section aleph
def alephIdx.initialSeg : @InitialSeg Cardinal Ordinal (· < ·) (· < ·) :=
@RelEmbedding.collapse Cardinal Ordinal (· < ·) (· < ·) _ Cardinal.ord.orderEmbedding.ltEmbedding
#align cardinal.aleph_idx.initial_seg Cardinal.alephIdx.initialSeg
def alephIdx : Cardinal → Ordinal :=
alephIdx.initialSeg
#align cardinal.aleph_idx Cardinal.alephIdx
@[simp]
theorem alephIdx.initialSeg_coe : (alephIdx.initialSeg : Cardinal → Ordinal) = alephIdx :=
rfl
#align cardinal.aleph_idx.initial_seg_coe Cardinal.alephIdx.initialSeg_coe
@[simp]
theorem alephIdx_lt {a b} : alephIdx a < alephIdx b ↔ a < b :=
alephIdx.initialSeg.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff
#align cardinal.aleph_idx_lt Cardinal.alephIdx_lt
@[simp]
theorem alephIdx_le {a b} : alephIdx a ≤ alephIdx b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, alephIdx_lt]
#align cardinal.aleph_idx_le Cardinal.alephIdx_le
theorem alephIdx.init {a b} : b < alephIdx a → ∃ c, alephIdx c = b :=
alephIdx.initialSeg.init
#align cardinal.aleph_idx.init Cardinal.alephIdx.init
def alephIdx.relIso : @RelIso Cardinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· < ·) (· < ·) :=
@RelIso.ofSurjective Cardinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· < ·) (· < ·) alephIdx.initialSeg.{u} <|
(InitialSeg.eq_or_principal alephIdx.initialSeg.{u}).resolve_right fun ⟨o, e⟩ => by
have : ∀ c, alephIdx c < o := fun c => (e _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩
refine Ordinal.inductionOn o ?_ this; intro α r _ h
let s := ⨆ a, invFun alephIdx (Ordinal.typein r a)
apply (lt_succ s).not_le
have I : Injective.{u+2, u+2} alephIdx := alephIdx.initialSeg.toEmbedding.injective
simpa only [typein_enum, leftInverse_invFun I (succ s)] using
le_ciSup
(Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{u, u} fun a : α => invFun alephIdx (Ordinal.typein r a))
(Ordinal.enum r _ (h (succ s)))
#align cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso Cardinal.alephIdx.relIso
@[simp]
theorem alephIdx.relIso_coe : (alephIdx.relIso : Cardinal → Ordinal) = alephIdx :=
rfl
#align cardinal.aleph_idx.rel_iso_coe Cardinal.alephIdx.relIso_coe
@[simp]
theorem type_cardinal : @type Cardinal (· < ·) _ = Ordinal.univ.{u, u + 1} := by
rw [Ordinal.univ_id]; exact Quotient.sound ⟨alephIdx.relIso⟩
#align cardinal.type_cardinal Cardinal.type_cardinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_cardinal : #Cardinal = univ.{u, u + 1} := by
simpa only [card_type, card_univ] using congr_arg card type_cardinal
#align cardinal.mk_cardinal Cardinal.mk_cardinal
def Aleph'.relIso :=
Cardinal.alephIdx.relIso.symm
#align cardinal.aleph'.rel_iso Cardinal.Aleph'.relIso
def aleph' : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Aleph'.relIso
#align cardinal.aleph' Cardinal.aleph'
@[simp]
theorem aleph'.relIso_coe : (Aleph'.relIso : Ordinal → Cardinal) = aleph' :=
rfl
#align cardinal.aleph'.rel_iso_coe Cardinal.aleph'.relIso_coe
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_lt {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : aleph' o₁ < aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
Aleph'.relIso.map_rel_iff
#align cardinal.aleph'_lt Cardinal.aleph'_lt
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_le {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : aleph' o₁ ≤ aleph' o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph'_lt
#align cardinal.aleph'_le Cardinal.aleph'_le
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_alephIdx (c : Cardinal) : aleph' c.alephIdx = c :=
Cardinal.alephIdx.relIso.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply c
#align cardinal.aleph'_aleph_idx Cardinal.aleph'_alephIdx
@[simp]
theorem alephIdx_aleph' (o : Ordinal) : (aleph' o).alephIdx = o :=
Cardinal.alephIdx.relIso.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply o
#align cardinal.aleph_idx_aleph' Cardinal.alephIdx_aleph'
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_zero : aleph' 0 = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero, ← aleph'_alephIdx 0, aleph'_le]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
#align cardinal.aleph'_zero Cardinal.aleph'_zero
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_succ {o : Ordinal} : aleph' (succ o) = succ (aleph' o) := by
apply (succ_le_of_lt <| aleph'_lt.2 <| lt_succ o).antisymm' (Cardinal.alephIdx_le.1 <| _)
rw [alephIdx_aleph', succ_le_iff, ← aleph'_lt, aleph'_alephIdx]
apply lt_succ
#align cardinal.aleph'_succ Cardinal.aleph'_succ
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, aleph' n = n
| 0 => aleph'_zero
| n + 1 => show aleph' (succ n) = n.succ by rw [aleph'_succ, aleph'_nat n, nat_succ]
#align cardinal.aleph'_nat Cardinal.aleph'_nat
theorem aleph'_le_of_limit {o : Ordinal} (l : o.IsLimit) {c} :
aleph' o ≤ c ↔ ∀ o' < o, aleph' o' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h o' h' => (aleph'_le.2 <| h'.le).trans h, fun h => by
rw [← aleph'_alephIdx c, aleph'_le, limit_le l]
intro x h'
rw [← aleph'_le, aleph'_alephIdx]
exact h _ h'⟩
#align cardinal.aleph'_le_of_limit Cardinal.aleph'_le_of_limit
theorem aleph'_limit {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) : aleph' o = ⨆ a : Iio o, aleph' a := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (ciSup_le' fun i => aleph'_le.2 (le_of_lt i.2))
rw [aleph'_le_of_limit ho]
exact fun a ha => le_ciSup (bddAbove_of_small _) (⟨a, ha⟩ : Iio o)
#align cardinal.aleph'_limit Cardinal.aleph'_limit
@[simp]
theorem aleph'_omega : aleph' ω = ℵ₀ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => by
simp only [aleph'_le_of_limit omega_isLimit, lt_omega, exists_imp, aleph0_le]
exact forall_swap.trans (forall_congr' fun n => by simp only [forall_eq, aleph'_nat])
#align cardinal.aleph'_omega Cardinal.aleph'_omega
@[simp]
def aleph'Equiv : Ordinal ≃ Cardinal :=
⟨aleph', alephIdx, alephIdx_aleph', aleph'_alephIdx⟩
#align cardinal.aleph'_equiv Cardinal.aleph'Equiv
def aleph (o : Ordinal) : Cardinal :=
aleph' (ω + o)
#align cardinal.aleph Cardinal.aleph
@[simp]
theorem aleph_lt {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : aleph o₁ < aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
aleph'_lt.trans (add_lt_add_iff_left _)
#align cardinal.aleph_lt Cardinal.aleph_lt
@[simp]
theorem aleph_le {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : aleph o₁ ≤ aleph o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 aleph_lt
#align cardinal.aleph_le Cardinal.aleph_le
@[simp]
theorem max_aleph_eq (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : max (aleph o₁) (aleph o₂) = aleph (max o₁ o₂) := by
rcases le_total (aleph o₁) (aleph o₂) with h | h
· rw [max_eq_right h, max_eq_right (aleph_le.1 h)]
· rw [max_eq_left h, max_eq_left (aleph_le.1 h)]
#align cardinal.max_aleph_eq Cardinal.max_aleph_eq
@[simp]
theorem aleph_succ {o : Ordinal} : aleph (succ o) = succ (aleph o) := by
rw [aleph, add_succ, aleph'_succ, aleph]
#align cardinal.aleph_succ Cardinal.aleph_succ
@[simp]
theorem aleph_zero : aleph 0 = ℵ₀ := by rw [aleph, add_zero, aleph'_omega]
#align cardinal.aleph_zero Cardinal.aleph_zero
theorem aleph_limit {o : Ordinal} (ho : o.IsLimit) : aleph o = ⨆ a : Iio o, aleph a := by
apply le_antisymm _ (ciSup_le' _)
· rw [aleph, aleph'_limit (ho.add _)]
refine ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_of_small _) ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
cases' lt_or_le i ω with h h
· rcases lt_omega.1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
use ⟨0, ho.pos⟩
simpa using (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le
· exact ⟨⟨_, (sub_lt_of_le h).2 hi⟩, aleph'_le.2 (le_add_sub _ _)⟩
· exact fun i => aleph_le.2 (le_of_lt i.2)
#align cardinal.aleph_limit Cardinal.aleph_limit
theorem aleph0_le_aleph' {o : Ordinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ aleph' o ↔ ω ≤ o := by rw [← aleph'_omega, aleph'_le]
#align cardinal.aleph_0_le_aleph' Cardinal.aleph0_le_aleph'
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean | 293 | 295 | theorem aleph0_le_aleph (o : Ordinal) : ℵ₀ ≤ aleph o := by |
rw [aleph, aleph0_le_aleph']
apply Ordinal.le_add_right
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Content
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Compact
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open Set Inv Function TopologicalSpace MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal Classical ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace haar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
@[to_additive addIndex "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index`"]
noncomputable def index (K V : Set G) : ℕ :=
sInf <| Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex
@[to_additive addIndex_empty]
theorem index_empty {V : Set G} : index ∅ V = 0 := by
simp only [index, Nat.sInf_eq_zero]; left; use ∅
simp only [Finset.card_empty, empty_subset, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_empty
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar`"]
noncomputable def prehaar (K₀ U : Set G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
(index (K : Set G) U : ℝ) / index K₀ U
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⊥ = 0 := by
rw [prehaar, Compacts.coe_bot, index_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_div]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G) :
0 ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by apply div_nonneg <;> norm_cast <;> apply zero_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_nonneg
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct`"]
def haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
pi univ fun K => Icc 0 <| index (K : Set G) K₀
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addHaarProduct
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_prehaar_empty {K₀ : Set G} {f : Compacts G → ℝ} :
f ∈ haarProduct K₀ ↔ ∀ K : Compacts G, f K ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) (index (K : Set G) K₀) := by
simp only [haarProduct, Set.pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_addPrehaar_empty
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar`"]
def clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
closure <| prehaar K₀ '' { U : Set G | U ⊆ V.1 ∧ IsOpen U ∧ (1 : G) ∈ U }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clAddPrehaar
variable [TopologicalGroup G]
@[to_additive addIndex_defined
"If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined, there is
a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties."]
theorem index_defined {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ n : ℕ, n ∈ Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V } := by
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK hV with ⟨t, ht⟩; exact ⟨t.card, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_defined
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_defined
@[to_additive addIndex_elim]
theorem index_elim {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Finset G, (K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) ∧ Finset.card t = index K V := by
have := Nat.sInf_mem (index_defined hK hV); rwa [mem_image] at this
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_elim
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_elim
@[to_additive le_addIndex_mul]
theorem le_index_mul (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K : Set G) V ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ * index (K₀ : Set G) V := by
obtain ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩ := index_elim K.isCompact K₀.interior_nonempty
obtain ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩ := index_elim K₀.isCompact hV
rw [← h2s, ← h2t, mul_comm]
refine le_trans ?_ Finset.card_mul_le
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans h1s ?_
apply iUnion₂_subset; intro g₁ hg₁; rw [preimage_subset_iff]; intro g₂ hg₂
have := h1t hg₂
rcases this with ⟨_, ⟨g₃, rfl⟩, A, ⟨hg₃, rfl⟩, h2V⟩; rw [mem_preimage, ← mul_assoc] at h2V
exact mem_biUnion (Finset.mul_mem_mul hg₃ hg₁) h2V
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_index_mul
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_add_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_addIndex_mul
@[to_additive addIndex_pos]
theorem index_pos (K : PositiveCompacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
0 < index (K : Set G) V := by
unfold index; rw [Nat.sInf_def, Nat.find_pos, mem_image]
· rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩; rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at h2t; subst h2t
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := K.interior_nonempty
show g ∈ (∅ : Set G)
convert h1t (interior_subset hg); symm
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty]
· exact index_defined K.isCompact hV
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_pos
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_pos
@[to_additive addIndex_mono]
theorem index_mono {K K' V : Set G} (hK' : IsCompact K') (h : K ⊆ K') (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index K V ≤ index K' V := by
rcases index_elim hK' hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]; exact ⟨s, Subset.trans h h1s, h2s⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_mono
@[to_additive addIndex_union_le]
theorem index_union_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V ≤ index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
rcases index_elim K₁.2 hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
rcases index_elim K₂.2 hV with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← h2s, ← h2t]
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.card_union_le _ _)
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
apply union_subset <;> refine Subset.trans (by assumption) ?_ <;>
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left <;> intro g hg <;> simp only [mem_def] at hg <;>
simp only [mem_def, Multiset.mem_union, Finset.union_val, hg, or_true_iff, true_or_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_union_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_union_le
@[to_additive addIndex_union_eq]
theorem index_union_eq (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * V⁻¹) (K₂.1 * V⁻¹)) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V = index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
apply le_antisymm (index_union_le K₁ K₂ hV)
rcases index_elim (K₁.2.union K₂.2) hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
have :
∀ K : Set G,
(K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ s, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) →
index K V ≤ (s.filter fun g => ((fun h : G => g * h) ⁻¹' V ∩ K).Nonempty).card := by
intro K hK; apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
intro g hg; rcases hK hg with ⟨_, ⟨g₀, rfl⟩, _, ⟨h1g₀, rfl⟩, h2g₀⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h2g₀
simp only [mem_iUnion]; use g₀; constructor; swap
· simp only [Finset.mem_filter, h1g₀, true_and_iff]; use g
simp only [hg, h2g₀, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, and_self_iff]
exact h2g₀
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (this K₁.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_left h1s)
(this K₂.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_right h1s)) ?_
rw [← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint, Finset.filter_union_right]
· exact s.card_filter_le _
apply Finset.disjoint_filter.mpr
rintro g₁ _ ⟨g₂, h1g₂, h2g₂⟩ ⟨g₃, h1g₃, h2g₃⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h1g₃ h1g₂
refine h.le_bot (?_ : g₁⁻¹ ∈ _)
constructor <;> simp only [Set.mem_inv, Set.mem_mul, exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₂, (g₁ * g₂)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₂]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₃, (g₁ * g₃)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₃]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_union_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_union_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_union_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_union_eq
@[to_additive add_left_addIndex_le]
theorem mul_left_index_le {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(g : G) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V ≤ index K V := by
rcases index_elim hK hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]
refine ⟨s.map (Equiv.mulRight g⁻¹).toEmbedding, ?_, Finset.card_map _⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans (image_subset _ h1s) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g₁, ⟨_, ⟨g₂, rfl⟩, ⟨_, ⟨hg₂, rfl⟩, hg₁⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at hg₁;
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Finset.mem_map, Equiv.coe_mulRight,
exists_exists_and_eq_and, mem_preimage, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply]
refine ⟨_, hg₂, ?_⟩; simp only [mul_assoc, hg₁, inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mul_left_index_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mul_left_index_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_left_add_index_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.add_left_addIndex_le
@[to_additive is_left_invariant_addIndex]
theorem is_left_invariant_index {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (g : G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V = index K V := by
refine le_antisymm (mul_left_index_le hK hV g) ?_
convert mul_left_index_le (hK.image <| continuous_mul_left g) hV g⁻¹
rw [image_image]; symm; convert image_id' _ with h; apply inv_mul_cancel_left
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_addIndex
@[to_additive add_prehaar_le_addIndex]
theorem prehaar_le_index (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ := by
unfold prehaar; rw [div_le_iff] <;> norm_cast
· apply le_index_mul K₀ K hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_le_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_le_index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_le_add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.add_prehaar_le_addIndex
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_pos (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) {K : Set G}
(h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : (interior K).Nonempty) : 0 < prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⟨K, h1K⟩ := by
apply div_pos <;> norm_cast
· apply index_pos ⟨⟨K, h1K⟩, h2K⟩ hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_pos
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_mono {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty)
{K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂.1) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_le_div_right]
· exact mod_cast index_mono K₂.2 h hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₀.toCompacts = 1 :=
div_self <| ne_of_gt <| mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_self
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_self
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Basic.lean | 337 | 342 | theorem prehaar_sup_le {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ + prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by |
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_add_div_same, div_le_div_right]
· exact mod_cast index_union_le K₁ K₂ hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.braided from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_category CategoryTheory.BraidedCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open Category
open MonoidalCategory
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 102 | 108 | theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by |
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.OfFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.PiSystem
#align_import measure_theory.measure.outer_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped Classical NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
section CaratheodoryMeasurable
universe u
variable {α : Type u} (m : OuterMeasure α)
attribute [local simp] Set.inter_comm Set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_assoc
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α}
def IsCaratheodory (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ t, m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.IsCaratheodory
theorem isCaratheodory_iff_le' {s : Set α} :
IsCaratheodory m s ↔ ∀ t, m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s) ≤ m t :=
forall_congr' fun _ => le_antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_right <| measure_le_inter_add_diff _ _ _
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_iff_le' MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_iff_le'
@[simp]
theorem isCaratheodory_empty : IsCaratheodory m ∅ := by simp [IsCaratheodory, m.empty, diff_empty]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_empty MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_empty
theorem isCaratheodory_compl : IsCaratheodory m s₁ → IsCaratheodory m s₁ᶜ := by
simp [IsCaratheodory, diff_eq, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_compl MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_compl
@[simp]
theorem isCaratheodory_compl_iff : IsCaratheodory m sᶜ ↔ IsCaratheodory m s :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using isCaratheodory_compl m h, isCaratheodory_compl m⟩
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_compl_iff MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_compl_iff
theorem isCaratheodory_union (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) (h₂ : IsCaratheodory m s₂) :
IsCaratheodory m (s₁ ∪ s₂) := fun t => by
rw [h₁ t, h₂ (t ∩ s₁), h₂ (t \ s₁), h₁ (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)), inter_diff_assoc _ _ s₁,
Set.inter_assoc _ _ s₁, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_left,
union_diff_left, h₂ (t ∩ s₁)]
simp [diff_eq, add_assoc]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_union MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_union
theorem measure_inter_union (h : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ ∅) (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) {t : Set α} :
m (t ∩ (s₁ ∪ s₂)) = m (t ∩ s₁) + m (t ∩ s₂) := by
rw [h₁, Set.inter_assoc, Set.union_inter_cancel_left, inter_diff_assoc, union_diff_cancel_left h]
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.measure_inter_union MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.measure_inter_union
theorem isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt {s : ℕ → Set α} :
∀ {n : ℕ}, (∀ i < n, IsCaratheodory m (s i)) → IsCaratheodory m (⋃ i < n, s i)
| 0, _ => by simp [Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1, h => by
rw [biUnion_lt_succ]
exact isCaratheodory_union m
(isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt fun i hi => h i <| lt_of_lt_of_le hi <| Nat.le_succ _)
(h n (le_refl (n + 1)))
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_Union_lt MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt
theorem isCaratheodory_inter (h₁ : IsCaratheodory m s₁) (h₂ : IsCaratheodory m s₂) :
IsCaratheodory m (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isCaratheodory_compl_iff, Set.compl_inter]
exact isCaratheodory_union _ (isCaratheodory_compl _ h₁) (isCaratheodory_compl _ h₂)
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_inter MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_inter
theorem isCaratheodory_sum {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, IsCaratheodory m (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) {t : Set α} :
∀ {n}, (∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, m (t ∩ s i)) = m (t ∩ ⋃ i < n, s i)
| 0 => by simp [Nat.not_lt_zero, m.empty]
| Nat.succ n => by
rw [biUnion_lt_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ, Set.union_comm, isCaratheodory_sum h hd,
m.measure_inter_union _ (h n), add_comm]
intro a
simpa using fun (h₁ : a ∈ s n) i (hi : i < n) h₂ => (hd (ne_of_gt hi)).le_bot ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_sum MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_sum
set_option linter.deprecated false in -- not immediately obvious how to replace `iUnion` here.
theorem isCaratheodory_iUnion_nat {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, IsCaratheodory m (s i))
(hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : IsCaratheodory m (⋃ i, s i) := by
apply (isCaratheodory_iff_le' m).mpr
intro t
have hp : m (t ∩ ⋃ i, s i) ≤ ⨆ n, m (t ∩ ⋃ i < n, s i) := by
convert m.iUnion fun i => t ∩ s i using 1
· simp [inter_iUnion]
· simp [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, isCaratheodory_sum m h hd]
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right hp _) ?_
rw [ENNReal.iSup_add]
refine iSup_le fun n => le_trans (add_le_add_left ?_ _)
(ge_of_eq (isCaratheodory_iUnion_lt m (fun i _ => h i) _))
refine m.mono (diff_subset_diff_right ?_)
exact iUnion₂_subset fun i _ => subset_iUnion _ i
#align measure_theory.outer_measure.is_caratheodory_Union_nat MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.isCaratheodory_iUnion_nat
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/Caratheodory.lean | 131 | 138 | theorem f_iUnion {s : ℕ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, IsCaratheodory m (s i)) (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) :
m (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, m (s i) := by |
refine le_antisymm (measure_iUnion_le s) ?_
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat]
refine iSup_le fun n => ?_
have := @isCaratheodory_sum _ m _ h hd univ n
simp only [inter_comm, inter_univ, univ_inter] at this; simp only [this, ge_iff_le]
exact m.mono (iUnion₂_subset fun i _ => subset_iUnion _ i)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop
#align_import algebra.order.group.with_top from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f178c0e25af359f6cbc72a96a243efd3b12423a3"
namespace WithTop
variable {α : Type*}
namespace LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] {a b c d : α}
instance instNeg : Neg (WithTop α) where neg := Option.map fun a : α => -a
protected def sub : ∀ _ _ : WithTop α, WithTop α
| _, ⊤ => ⊤
| ⊤, (x : α) => ⊤
| (x : α), (y : α) => (x - y : α)
instance instSub : Sub (WithTop α) where sub := WithTop.LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (a : α) : ((-a : α) : WithTop α) = -a :=
rfl
#align with_top.coe_neg WithTop.LinearOrderedAddCommGroup.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem neg_top : -(⊤ : WithTop α) = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub {a b : α} : (↑(a - b) : WithTop α) = ↑a - ↑b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_sub {a : WithTop α} : (⊤ : WithTop α) - a = ⊤ := by
cases a <;> rfl
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Group/WithTop.lean | 65 | 65 | theorem sub_top {a : WithTop α} : a - ⊤ = ⊤ := by | cases a <;> rfl
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.ArctanDeriv
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.bounds from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Set
namespace Real
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem sin_lt (h : 0 < x) : sin x < x := by
cases' lt_or_le 1 x with h' h'
· exact (sin_le_one x).trans_lt h'
have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg h.le
have := le_of_abs_le (sin_bound <| show |x| ≤ 1 by rwa [hx])
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', hx] at this
apply this.trans_lt
rw [sub_add, sub_lt_self_iff, sub_pos, div_eq_mul_inv (x ^ 3)]
refine mul_lt_mul' ?_ (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (pow_pos h 3)
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_one h.le h'
norm_num
#align real.sin_lt Real.sin_lt
lemma sin_le (hx : 0 ≤ x) : sin x ≤ x := by
obtain rfl | hx := hx.eq_or_lt
· simp
· exact (sin_lt hx).le
lemma lt_sin (hx : x < 0) : x < sin x := by simpa using sin_lt <| neg_pos.2 hx
lemma le_sin (hx : x ≤ 0) : x ≤ sin x := by simpa using sin_le <| neg_nonneg.2 hx
lemma one_sub_sq_div_two_le_cos : 1 - x ^ 2 / 2 ≤ cos x := by
wlog hx₀ : 0 ≤ x
· simpa using this $ neg_nonneg.2 $ le_of_not_le hx₀
suffices MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ cos x + x ^ 2 / 2) (Ici 0) by
simpa using this left_mem_Ici hx₀ hx₀
refine monotoneOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt_nonneg
(convex_Ici _)
(Continuous.continuousOn <| by continuity)
(fun x _ ↦ ((hasDerivAt_cos ..).add <| (hasDerivAt_pow ..).div_const _).hasDerivWithinAt)
fun x hx ↦ ?_
simpa [mul_div_cancel_left₀] using sin_le <| interior_subset hx
lemma two_div_pi_mul_le_sin (hx₀ : 0 ≤ x) (hx : x ≤ π / 2) : 2 / π * x ≤ sin x := by
rw [← sub_nonneg]
suffices ConcaveOn ℝ (Icc 0 (π / 2)) (fun x ↦ sin x - 2 / π * x) by
refine (le_min ?_ ?_).trans $ this.min_le_of_mem_Icc ⟨hx₀, hx⟩ <;> field_simp
exact concaveOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonpos (convex_Icc ..)
(Continuous.continuousOn $ by continuity)
(fun x _ ↦ ((hasDerivAt_sin ..).sub $ (hasDerivAt_id ..).const_mul (2 / π)).hasDerivWithinAt)
(fun x _ ↦ (hasDerivAt_cos ..).hasDerivWithinAt.sub_const _)
fun x hx ↦ neg_nonpos.2 $ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc $ Icc_subset_Icc_right (by linarith) $
interior_subset hx
lemma sin_le_two_div_pi_mul (hx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hx₀ : x ≤ 0) : sin x ≤ 2 / π * x := by
simpa using two_div_pi_mul_le_sin (neg_nonneg.2 hx₀) (neg_le.2 hx)
lemma one_sub_two_div_pi_mul_le_cos (hx₀ : 0 ≤ x) (hx : x ≤ π / 2) : 1 - 2 / π * x ≤ cos x := by
simpa [sin_pi_div_two_sub, mul_sub, div_mul_div_comm, mul_comm π, div_self two_pi_pos.ne']
using two_div_pi_mul_le_sin (x := π / 2 - x) (by simpa) (by simpa)
lemma cos_quadratic_upper_bound (hx : |x| ≤ π) : cos x ≤ 1 - 2 / π ^ 2 * x ^ 2 := by
wlog hx₀ : 0 ≤ x
· simpa using this (by rwa [abs_neg]) $ neg_nonneg.2 $ le_of_not_le hx₀
rw [abs_of_nonneg hx₀] at hx
-- TODO: `compute_deriv` tactic?
have hderiv (x) : HasDerivAt (fun x ↦ 1 - 2 / π ^ 2 * x ^ 2 - cos x) _ x :=
(((hasDerivAt_pow ..).const_mul _).const_sub _).sub $ hasDerivAt_cos _
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, pow_one, ← neg_sub', neg_sub,
← mul_assoc] at hderiv
have hmono : MonotoneOn (fun x ↦ 1 - 2 / π ^ 2 * x ^ 2 - cos x) (Icc 0 (π / 2)) := by
refine monotoneOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt_nonneg
(convex_Icc ..)
(Continuous.continuousOn $ by continuity)
(fun x _ ↦ (hderiv _).hasDerivWithinAt)
fun x hx ↦ sub_nonneg.2 ?_
have ⟨hx₀, hx⟩ := interior_subset hx
calc 2 / π ^ 2 * 2 * x
= 2 / π * (2 / π * x) := by ring
_ ≤ 1 * sin x := by
gcongr; exacts [div_le_one_of_le two_le_pi (by positivity), two_div_pi_mul_le_sin hx₀ hx]
_ = sin x := one_mul _
have hconc : ConcaveOn ℝ (Icc (π / 2) π) (fun x ↦ 1 - 2 / π ^ 2 * x ^ 2 - cos x) := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
refine concaveOn_of_hasDerivWithinAt2_nonpos (convex_Icc ..)
(Continuous.continuousOn $ by continuity) (fun x _ ↦ (hderiv _).hasDerivWithinAt)
(fun x _ ↦ ((hasDerivAt_sin ..).sub $ (hasDerivAt_id ..).const_mul _).hasDerivWithinAt)
fun x hx ↦ ?_
have ⟨hx, hx'⟩ := interior_subset hx
calc
_ ≤ (0 : ℝ) - 0 := by
gcongr
· exact cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le hx $ hx'.trans $ by linarith
· positivity
_ = 0 := sub_zero _
rw [← sub_nonneg]
obtain hx' | hx' := le_total x (π / 2)
· simpa using hmono (left_mem_Icc.2 $ by positivity) ⟨hx₀, hx'⟩ hx₀
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
refine (le_min ?_ ?_).trans $ hconc.min_le_of_mem_Icc ⟨hx', hx⟩ <;> field_simp <;> norm_num
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Bounds.lean | 138 | 147 | theorem sin_gt_sub_cube {x : ℝ} (h : 0 < x) (h' : x ≤ 1) : x - x ^ 3 / 4 < sin x := by |
have hx : |x| = x := abs_of_nonneg h.le
have := neg_le_of_abs_le (sin_bound <| show |x| ≤ 1 by rwa [hx])
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, hx] at this
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ this
have : x ^ 3 / ↑4 - x ^ 3 / ↑6 = x ^ 3 * 12⁻¹ := by norm_num [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_sub]
rw [add_comm, sub_add, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_lt_sub_iff_left, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt', this]
refine mul_lt_mul' ?_ (by norm_num) (by norm_num) (pow_pos h 3)
apply pow_le_pow_of_le_one h.le h'
norm_num
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
#align_import analysis.convex.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
universe u u'
variable {R R' E F ι ι' α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField R] [LinearOrderedField R'] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup F] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Module R E] [Module R F] [Module R α]
[OrderedSMul R α] {s : Set E}
def Finset.centerMass (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i ∈ t, w i)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i
#align finset.center_mass Finset.centerMass
variable (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open Finset
theorem Finset.centerMass_empty : (∅ : Finset ι).centerMass w z = 0 := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_empty Finset.centerMass_empty
theorem Finset.centerMass_pair (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_pair hne, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align finset.center_mass_pair Finset.centerMass_pair
variable {w}
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Combination.lean | 61 | 67 | theorem Finset.centerMass_insert (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).centerMass w z =
(w i / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j ∈ t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • t.centerMass w z := by |
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel hw, one_div]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
#align_import topology.dense_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"148aefbd371a25f1cff33c85f20c661ce3155def"
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
open scoped Topology
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {δ : Type*}
structure DenseInducing [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] (i : α → β)
extends Inducing i : Prop where
protected dense : DenseRange i
#align dense_inducing DenseInducing
namespace DenseInducing
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
variable {i : α → β} (di : DenseInducing i)
theorem nhds_eq_comap (di : DenseInducing i) : ∀ a : α, 𝓝 a = comap i (𝓝 <| i a) :=
di.toInducing.nhds_eq_comap
#align dense_inducing.nhds_eq_comap DenseInducing.nhds_eq_comap
protected theorem continuous (di : DenseInducing i) : Continuous i :=
di.toInducing.continuous
#align dense_inducing.continuous DenseInducing.continuous
theorem closure_range : closure (range i) = univ :=
di.dense.closure_range
#align dense_inducing.closure_range DenseInducing.closure_range
protected theorem preconnectedSpace [PreconnectedSpace α] (di : DenseInducing i) :
PreconnectedSpace β :=
di.dense.preconnectedSpace di.continuous
#align dense_inducing.preconnected_space DenseInducing.preconnectedSpace
theorem closure_image_mem_nhds {s : Set α} {a : α} (di : DenseInducing i) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
closure (i '' s) ∈ 𝓝 (i a) := by
rw [di.nhds_eq_comap a, ((nhds_basis_opens _).comap _).mem_iff] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨U, ⟨haU, hUo⟩, sub : i ⁻¹' U ⊆ s⟩
refine mem_of_superset (hUo.mem_nhds haU) ?_
calc
U ⊆ closure (i '' (i ⁻¹' U)) := di.dense.subset_closure_image_preimage_of_isOpen hUo
_ ⊆ closure (i '' s) := closure_mono (image_subset i sub)
#align dense_inducing.closure_image_mem_nhds DenseInducing.closure_image_mem_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/DenseEmbedding.lean | 75 | 78 | theorem dense_image (di : DenseInducing i) {s : Set α} : Dense (i '' s) ↔ Dense s := by |
refine ⟨fun H x => ?_, di.dense.dense_image di.continuous⟩
rw [di.toInducing.closure_eq_preimage_closure_image, H.closure_eq, preimage_univ]
trivial
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import algebra.order.to_interval_mod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [hα : Archimedean α] {p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
#align to_Ico_div toIcoDiv
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul_mem_Ico sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ico_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
#align to_Ioc_div toIocDiv
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
#align sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul_mem_Ioc sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
#align to_Ioc_div_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ico_mod toIcoMod
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
#align to_Ioc_mod toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico toIcoMod_mem_Ico
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
#align to_Ico_mod_mem_Ico' toIcoMod_mem_Ico'
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
#align to_Ioc_mod_mem_Ioc toIocMod_mem_Ioc
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
#align left_le_to_Ico_mod left_le_toIcoMod
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
#align left_lt_to_Ioc_mod left_lt_toIocMod
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
#align to_Ico_mod_lt_right toIcoMod_lt_right
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
#align to_Ioc_mod_le_right toIocMod_le_right
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ico_div_zsmul self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
#align self_sub_to_Ioc_div_zsmul self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ico_div_zsmul_sub_self toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
#align to_Ioc_div_zsmul_sub_self toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ico_mod_sub_self toIcoMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
#align to_Ioc_mod_sub_self toIocMod_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
#align self_sub_to_Ico_mod self_sub_toIcoMod
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 148 | 149 | theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by |
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
#align_import algebra.monoid_algebra.support from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"16749fc4661828cba18cd0f4e3c5eb66a8e80598"
open scoped Pointwise
universe u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace MonoidAlgebra
open Finset Finsupp
variable {k : Type u₁} {G : Type u₂} [Semiring k]
theorem support_mul [Mul G] [DecidableEq G] (a b : MonoidAlgebra k G) :
(a * b).support ⊆ a.support * b.support := by
rw [MonoidAlgebra.mul_def]
exact support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _x hx ↦
support_sum.trans <| biUnion_subset.2 fun _y hy ↦
support_single_subset.trans <| singleton_subset_iff.2 <| mem_image₂_of_mem hx hy
#align monoid_algebra.support_mul MonoidAlgebra.support_mul
theorem support_single_mul_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(single a r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support ⊆ Finset.image (a * ·) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_right support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_left]
#align monoid_algebra.support_single_mul_subset MonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul_subset
theorem support_mul_single_subset [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k) (a : G) :
(f * single a r).support ⊆ Finset.image (· * a) f.support :=
(support_mul _ _).trans <| (Finset.image₂_subset_left support_single_subset).trans <| by
rw [Finset.image₂_singleton_right]
#align monoid_algebra.support_mul_single_subset MonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single_subset
theorem support_single_mul_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, r * y = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (lx : IsLeftRegular x) :
(single x r * f : MonoidAlgebra k G).support = Finset.image (x * ·) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_single_mul_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ x * a = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, zero_mul, ite_self, sum_zero, lx.eq_iff]
#align monoid_algebra.support_single_mul_eq_image MonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul_eq_image
theorem support_mul_single_eq_image [DecidableEq G] [Mul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) {r : k}
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) {x : G} (rx : IsRightRegular x) :
(f * single x r).support = Finset.image (· * x) f.support := by
refine subset_antisymm (support_mul_single_subset f _ _) fun y hy => ?_
obtain ⟨y, yf, rfl⟩ : ∃ a : G, a ∈ f.support ∧ a * x = y := by
simpa only [Finset.mem_image, exists_prop] using hy
simp only [mul_apply, mem_support_iff.mp yf, hr, mem_support_iff, sum_single_index,
Finsupp.sum_ite_eq', Ne, not_false_iff, if_true, mul_zero, ite_self, sum_zero, rx.eq_iff]
#align monoid_algebra.support_mul_single_eq_image MonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single_eq_image
| Mathlib/Algebra/MonoidAlgebra/Support.lean | 65 | 71 | theorem support_mul_single [Mul G] [IsRightCancelMul G] (f : MonoidAlgebra k G) (r : k)
(hr : ∀ y, y * r = 0 ↔ y = 0) (x : G) :
(f * single x r).support = f.support.map (mulRightEmbedding x) := by |
classical
ext
simp only [support_mul_single_eq_image f hr (IsRightRegular.all x),
mem_image, mem_map, mulRightEmbedding_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
#align_import topology.path_connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Path (x y : X) extends C(I, X) where
source' : toFun 0 = x
target' : toFun 1 = y
#align path Path
instance Path.funLike : FunLike (Path x y) I X where
coe := fun γ ↦ ⇑γ.toContinuousMap
coe_injective' := fun γ₁ γ₂ h => by
simp only [DFunLike.coe_fn_eq] at h
cases γ₁; cases γ₂; congr
-- Porting note (#10754): added this instance so that we can use `FunLike.coe` for `CoeFun`
-- this also fixed very strange `simp` timeout issues
instance Path.continuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass (Path x y) I X where
map_continuous := fun γ => show Continuous γ.toContinuousMap by continuity
-- Porting note: not necessary in light of the instance above
@[ext]
protected theorem Path.ext : ∀ {γ₁ γ₂ : Path x y}, (γ₁ : I → X) = γ₂ → γ₁ = γ₂ := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, h11⟩, h12, h13⟩ ⟨⟨x, h21⟩, h22, h23⟩ rfl
rfl
#align path.ext Path.ext
namespace Path
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk_mk (f : I → X) (h₁) (h₂ : f 0 = x) (h₃ : f 1 = y) :
⇑(mk ⟨f, h₁⟩ h₂ h₃ : Path x y) = f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_mk Path.coe_mk_mk
-- Porting note: the name `Path.coe_mk` better refers to a new lemma below
variable (γ : Path x y)
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous γ :=
γ.continuous_toFun
#align path.continuous Path.continuous
@[simp]
protected theorem source : γ 0 = x :=
γ.source'
#align path.source Path.source
@[simp]
protected theorem target : γ 1 = y :=
γ.target'
#align path.target Path.target
def simps.apply : I → X :=
γ
#align path.simps.apply Path.simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections Path (toFun → simps.apply, -toContinuousMap)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap : ⇑γ.toContinuousMap = γ :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_continuous_map Path.coe_toContinuousMap
-- Porting note: this is needed because of the `Path.continuousMapClass` instance
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk : ⇑(γ : C(I, X)) = γ :=
rfl
instance hasUncurryPath {X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {x y : α → X} :
HasUncurry (∀ a : α, Path (x a) (y a)) (α × I) X :=
⟨fun φ p => φ p.1 p.2⟩
#align path.has_uncurry_path Path.hasUncurryPath
@[refl, simps]
def refl (x : X) : Path x x where
toFun _t := x
continuous_toFun := continuous_const
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align path.refl Path.refl
@[simp]
theorem refl_range {a : X} : range (Path.refl a) = {a} := by simp [Path.refl, CoeFun.coe]
#align path.refl_range Path.refl_range
@[symm, simps]
def symm (γ : Path x y) : Path y x where
toFun := γ ∘ σ
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simpa [-Path.target] using γ.target
target' := by simpa [-Path.source] using γ.source
#align path.symm Path.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (γ : Path x y) : γ.symm.symm = γ := by
ext t
show γ (σ (σ t)) = γ t
rw [unitInterval.symm_symm]
#align path.symm_symm Path.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Path.symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm {a : X} : (Path.refl a).symm = Path.refl a := by
ext
rfl
#align path.refl_symm Path.refl_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) : range γ.symm = range γ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_range, Path.symm, DFunLike.coe, unitInterval.symm, SetCoe.exists, comp_apply,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ <;> refine ⟨1 - y, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp hy, ?_⟩ <;>
convert hxy
simp
#align path.symm_range Path.symm_range
open ContinuousMap
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Path x y) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced ((↑) : _ → C(I, X)) ContinuousMap.compactOpen
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous fun p : Path x y × I => p.1 p.2 :=
continuous_eval.comp <| (continuous_induced_dom (α := Path x y)).prod_map continuous_id
#align path.continuous_eval Path.continuous_eval
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_eval {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → I}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun y => f y (g y) :=
Continuous.comp continuous_eval (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align continuous.path_eval Continuous.path_eval
theorem continuous_uncurry_iff {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : Y → Path x y} :
Continuous ↿g ↔ Continuous g :=
Iff.symm <| continuous_induced_rng.trans
⟨fun h => continuous_uncurry_of_continuous ⟨_, h⟩,
continuous_of_continuous_uncurry (fun (y : Y) ↦ ContinuousMap.mk (g y))⟩
#align path.continuous_uncurry_iff Path.continuous_uncurry_iff
def extend : ℝ → X :=
IccExtend zero_le_one γ
#align path.extend Path.extend
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_extend {γ : Y → Path x y} {f : Y → ℝ} (hγ : Continuous ↿γ)
(hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun t => (γ t).extend (f t) :=
Continuous.IccExtend hγ hf
#align continuous.path_extend Continuous.path_extend
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_extend : Continuous γ.extend :=
γ.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align path.continuous_extend Path.continuous_extend
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
{l r : Y → X} {y : Y} {l₁ : Filter ℝ} {l₂ : Filter X} {γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y)}
(hγ : Tendsto (↿γ) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁.map (projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one)) l₂) :
Tendsto (↿fun x => (γ x).extend) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁) l₂ :=
Filter.Tendsto.IccExtend _ hγ
#align filter.tendsto.path_extend Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
theorem _root_.ContinuousAt.path_extend {g : Y → ℝ} {l r : Y → X} (γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y))
{y : Y} (hγ : ContinuousAt (↿γ) (y, projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (g y))) (hg : ContinuousAt g y) :
ContinuousAt (fun i => (γ i).extend (g i)) y :=
hγ.IccExtend (fun x => γ x) hg
#align continuous_at.path_extend ContinuousAt.path_extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
IccExtend_of_mem _ γ ht
#align path.extend_extends Path.extend_extends
theorem extend_zero : γ.extend 0 = x := by simp
#align path.extend_zero Path.extend_zero
theorem extend_one : γ.extend 1 = y := by simp
#align path.extend_one Path.extend_one
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends' {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ t :=
IccExtend_val _ γ t
#align path.extend_extends' Path.extend_extends'
@[simp]
theorem extend_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
range γ.extend = range γ :=
IccExtend_range _ γ
#align path.extend_range Path.extend_range
theorem extend_of_le_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : γ.extend t = a :=
(IccExtend_of_le_left _ _ ht).trans γ.source
#align path.extend_of_le_zero Path.extend_of_le_zero
theorem extend_of_one_le {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : 1 ≤ t) : γ.extend t = b :=
(IccExtend_of_right_le _ _ ht).trans γ.target
#align path.extend_of_one_le Path.extend_of_one_le
@[simp]
theorem refl_extend {a : X} : (Path.refl a).extend = fun _ => a :=
rfl
#align path.refl_extend Path.refl_extend
def ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) : Path x y where
toFun := f ∘ ((↑) : unitInterval → ℝ)
continuous_toFun := hf.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val Subtype.prop
source' := h₀
target' := h₁
#align path.of_line Path.ofLine
theorem ofLine_mem {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) :
∀ t, ofLine hf h₀ h₁ t ∈ f '' I := fun ⟨t, t_in⟩ => ⟨t, t_in, rfl⟩
#align path.of_line_mem Path.ofLine_mem
attribute [local simp] Iic_def
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
@[trans]
def trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : Path x z where
toFun := (fun t : ℝ => if t ≤ 1 / 2 then γ.extend (2 * t) else γ'.extend (2 * t - 1)) ∘ (↑)
continuous_toFun := by
refine
(Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ continuous_id continuous_const (by norm_num)).comp
continuous_subtype_val <;>
continuity
source' := by norm_num
target' := by norm_num
#align path.trans Path.trans
theorem trans_apply (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) (t : I) :
(γ.trans γ') t =
if h : (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then γ ⟨2 * t, (mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨t.2.1, h⟩⟩
else γ' ⟨2 * t - 1, two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, t.2.2⟩⟩ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by split_ifs <;> rw [extend_extends]
#align path.trans_apply Path.trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : (γ.trans γ').symm = γ'.symm.trans γ.symm := by
ext t
simp only [trans_apply, ← one_div, symm_apply, not_le, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h h₁ h₂ <;> rw [coe_symm_eq] at h
· have ht : (t : ℝ) = 1 / 2 := by linarith
norm_num [ht]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, mul_sub]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [mul_sub, h]
ring -- TODO norm_num should really do this
· exfalso
linarith
#align path.trans_symm Path.trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans_refl {a : X} :
(Path.refl a).trans (Path.refl a) = Path.refl a := by
ext
simp only [Path.trans, ite_self, one_div, Path.refl_extend]
rfl
#align path.refl_trans_refl Path.refl_trans_refl
theorem trans_range {a b c : X} (γ₁ : Path a b) (γ₂ : Path b c) :
range (γ₁.trans γ₂) = range γ₁ ∪ range γ₂ := by
rw [Path.trans]
apply eq_of_subset_of_subset
· rintro x ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩
by_cases h : t ≤ 1 / 2
· left
use ⟨2 * t, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₁.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos h] at hxt
· right
use ⟨2 * t - 1, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₂.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_neg h] at hxt
· rintro x (⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩ | ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩)
· use ⟨t / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
have : t / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := (div_le_div_right (zero_lt_two : (0 : ℝ) < 2)).mpr ht1
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos this, Subtype.coe_mk]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₁.extend_extends]
· by_cases h : t = 0
· use ⟨1 / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos le_rfl, Subtype.coe_mk,
mul_one_div_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
rw [γ₁.extend_one]
rwa [← γ₂.extend_extends, h, γ₂.extend_zero] at hxt
· use ⟨(t + 1) / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
replace h : t ≠ 0 := h
have ht0 := lt_of_le_of_ne ht0 h.symm
have : ¬(t + 1) / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [not_le]
linarith
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, if_neg this]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₂.extend_extends]
#align path.trans_range Path.trans_range
def map' (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : ContinuousOn f (range γ)) : Path (f x) (f y) where
toFun := f ∘ γ
continuous_toFun := h.comp_continuous γ.continuous (fun x ↦ mem_range_self x)
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
def map (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Path (f x) (f y) := γ.map' h.continuousOn
#align path.map Path.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h : I → Y) = f ∘ γ := by
ext t
rfl
#align path.map_coe Path.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h).symm = γ.symm.map h :=
rfl
#align path.map_symm Path.map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) {f : X → Y}
(h : Continuous f) : (γ.trans γ').map h = (γ.map h).trans (γ'.map h) := by
ext t
rw [trans_apply, map_coe, Function.comp_apply, trans_apply]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.map_trans Path.map_trans
@[simp]
theorem map_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.map continuous_id = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_id Path.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (γ : Path x y) {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Z]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) :
(γ.map hf).map hg = γ.map (hg.comp hf) := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_map Path.map_map
def cast (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : Path x' y' where
toFun := γ
continuous_toFun := γ.continuous
source' := by simp [hx]
target' := by simp [hy]
#align path.cast Path.cast
@[simp]
theorem symm_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).symm = γ.symm.cast hb ha :=
rfl
#align path.symm_cast Path.symm_cast
@[simp]
theorem trans_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ c₁ c₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂)
(γ' : Path b₂ c₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) (hc : c₁ = c₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).trans (γ'.cast hb hc) = (γ.trans γ').cast ha hc :=
rfl
#align path.trans_cast Path.trans_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_coe (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : (γ.cast hx hy : I → X) = γ :=
rfl
#align path.cast_coe Path.cast_coe
@[continuity]
theorem symm_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).symm :=
h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_symm)
#align path.symm_continuous_family Path.symm_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous (symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
continuous_uncurry_iff.mp <| symm_continuous_family _ (continuous_fst.path_eval continuous_snd)
#align path.continuous_symm Path.continuous_symm
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).extend := by
apply h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_projIcc)
exact zero_le_one
#align path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem trans_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b c : ι → X} (γ₁ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h₁ : Continuous ↿γ₁)
(γ₂ : ∀ t : ι, Path (b t) (c t)) (h₂ : Continuous ↿γ₂) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ₁ t).trans (γ₂ t) := by
have h₁' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₁ h₁
have h₂' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₂ h₂
simp only [HasUncurry.uncurry, CoeFun.coe, Path.trans, (· ∘ ·)]
refine Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) continuous_const ?_
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₁ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x : I → ℝ))
exact h₁'.comp (continuous_id.prod_map <| continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val)
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₂ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x - 1 : I → ℝ))
exact
h₂'.comp
(continuous_id.prod_map <|
(continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val).sub continuous_const)
· rintro st hst
simp [hst, mul_inv_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
#align path.trans_continuous_family Path.trans_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_trans {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → Path y z} :
Continuous f → Continuous g → Continuous fun t => (f t).trans (g t) := by
intro hf hg
apply continuous_uncurry_iff.mp
exact trans_continuous_family _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hf) _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hg)
#align continuous.path_trans Continuous.path_trans
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_trans {x y z : X} : Continuous fun ρ : Path x y × Path y z => ρ.1.trans ρ.2 :=
continuous_fst.path_trans continuous_snd
#align path.continuous_trans Path.continuous_trans
section Prod
variable {a₁ a₂ a₃ : X} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : Y}
protected def prod (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) : Path (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.prodMk γ₁.toContinuousMap γ₂.toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.prod Path.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_coe (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) :
⇑(γ₁.prod γ₂) = fun t => (γ₁ t, γ₂ t) :=
rfl
#align path.prod_coe_fn Path.prod_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 552 | 558 | theorem trans_prod_eq_prod_trans (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (δ₁ : Path a₂ a₃) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂)
(δ₂ : Path b₂ b₃) : (γ₁.prod γ₂).trans (δ₁.prod δ₂) = (γ₁.trans δ₁).prod (γ₂.trans δ₂) := by |
ext t <;>
unfold Path.trans <;>
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Path.prod_coe, Function.comp_apply] <;>
split_ifs <;>
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Init.Algebra.Classes
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Batteries.Tactic.Lint.Basic
#align_import logic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
#align_import init.ite_simp from "leanprover-community/lean"@"4a03bdeb31b3688c31d02d7ff8e0ff2e5d6174db"
open Function
attribute [local instance 10] Classical.propDecidable
open Function
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
#align has_mem.mem.ne_of_not_mem Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem
#align has_mem.mem.ne_of_not_mem' Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem'
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
#align ball_cond_comm forall_cond_comm
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
#align ball_mem_comm forall_mem_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_cond_comm := forall_cond_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_mem_comm := forall_mem_comm
#align ne_of_apply_ne ne_of_apply_ne
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
#align eq.trans_ne Eq.trans_ne
#align ne.trans_eq Ne.trans_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
#align eq_equivalence eq_equivalence
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
#align eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mp_eq_cast
#align eq_mpr_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
#align cast_cast cast_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
#align congr_refl_left congr_refl_left
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
#align congr_refl_right congr_refl_right
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
#align congr_arg_refl congr_arg_refl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
#align congr_fun_rfl congr_fun_rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
#align congr_fun_congr_arg congr_fun_congr_arg
#align heq_of_cast_eq heq_of_cast_eq
#align cast_eq_iff_heq cast_eq_iff_heq
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem. More general version of `eqRec_heq`
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
set_option autoImplicit true in
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 601 | 602 | theorem rec_heq_of_heq {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} (e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) :
HEq (e ▸ x) y := by | subst e; exact h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Ker
#align_import linear_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
open Function
variable {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*} {K₂ : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
section
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
def range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : Submodule R₂ M₂ :=
(map f ⊤).copy (Set.range f) Set.image_univ.symm
#align linear_map.range LinearMap.range
theorem range_coe [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : (range f : Set M₂) = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_coe LinearMap.range_coe
theorem range_toAddSubmonoid [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
f.range.toAddSubmonoid = AddMonoidHom.mrange f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.range_to_add_submonoid LinearMap.range_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
theorem mem_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {x} : x ∈ range f ↔ ∃ y, f y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align linear_map.mem_range LinearMap.mem_range
theorem range_eq_map [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) : range f = map f ⊤ := by
ext
simp
#align linear_map.range_eq_map LinearMap.range_eq_map
theorem mem_range_self [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : F) (x : M) : f x ∈ range f :=
⟨x, rfl⟩
#align linear_map.mem_range_self LinearMap.mem_range_self
@[simp]
theorem range_id : range (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊤ :=
SetLike.coe_injective Set.range_id
#align linear_map.range_id LinearMap.range_id
theorem range_comp [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃]
(f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = map g (range f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective (Set.range_comp g f)
#align linear_map.range_comp LinearMap.range_comp
theorem range_comp_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₂₃] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₃] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂)
(g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) : range (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) ≤ range g :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.range_comp_subset_range f g)
#align linear_map.range_comp_le_range LinearMap.range_comp_le_range
theorem range_eq_top [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} : range f = ⊤ ↔ Surjective f := by
rw [SetLike.ext'_iff, range_coe, top_coe, Set.range_iff_surjective]
#align linear_map.range_eq_top LinearMap.range_eq_top
theorem range_le_iff_comap [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂} :
range f ≤ p ↔ comap f p = ⊤ := by rw [range_eq_map, map_le_iff_le_comap, eq_top_iff]
#align linear_map.range_le_iff_comap LinearMap.range_le_iff_comap
theorem map_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R M} : map f p ≤ range f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset_range f p)
#align linear_map.map_le_range LinearMap.map_le_range
@[simp]
theorem range_neg {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {M : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} [Semiring R] [Ring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
[RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : LinearMap.range (-f) = LinearMap.range f := by
change range ((-LinearMap.id : M₂ →ₗ[R₂] M₂).comp f) = _
rw [range_comp, Submodule.map_neg, Submodule.map_id]
#align linear_map.range_neg LinearMap.range_neg
lemma range_domRestrict_le_range [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (S : Submodule R M) :
LinearMap.range (f.domRestrict S) ≤ LinearMap.range f := by
rintro x ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, rfl⟩
exact LinearMap.mem_range_self f y
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AddMonoidHom.coe_toIntLinearMap_range {M M₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup M]
[AddCommGroup M₂] (f : M →+ M₂) :
LinearMap.range f.toIntLinearMap = AddSubgroup.toIntSubmodule f.range := rfl
lemma _root_.Submodule.map_comap_eq_of_le [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] {f : F} {p : Submodule R₂ M₂}
(h : p ≤ LinearMap.range f) : (p.comap f).map f = p :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_preimage_eq_of_subset h
end
@[simps]
def iterateRange (f : M →ₗ[R] M) : ℕ →o (Submodule R M)ᵒᵈ where
toFun n := LinearMap.range (f ^ n)
monotone' n m w x h := by
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := le_iff_exists_add.mp w
rw [LinearMap.mem_range] at h
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := h
rw [LinearMap.mem_range]
use (f ^ c) m
rw [pow_add, LinearMap.mul_apply]
#align linear_map.iterate_range LinearMap.iterateRange
abbrev rangeRestrict [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] LinearMap.range f :=
f.codRestrict (LinearMap.range f) (LinearMap.mem_range_self f)
#align linear_map.range_restrict LinearMap.rangeRestrict
instance fintypeRange [Fintype M] [DecidableEq M₂] [RingHomSurjective τ₁₂] (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) :
Fintype (range f) :=
Set.fintypeRange f
#align linear_map.fintype_range LinearMap.fintypeRange
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Range.lean | 167 | 170 | theorem range_codRestrict {τ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} [RingHomSurjective τ₂₁] (p : Submodule R M)
(f : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₁] M) (hf) :
range (codRestrict p f hf) = comap p.subtype (LinearMap.range f) := by |
simpa only [range_eq_map] using map_codRestrict _ _ _ _
|
import Batteries.Classes.Order
namespace Batteries.PairingHeapImp
inductive Heap (α : Type u) where
| nil : Heap α
| node (a : α) (child sibling : Heap α) : Heap α
deriving Repr
def Heap.size : Heap α → Nat
| .nil => 0
| .node _ c s => c.size + 1 + s.size
def Heap.singleton (a : α) : Heap α := .node a .nil .nil
def Heap.isEmpty : Heap α → Bool
| .nil => true
| _ => false
@[specialize] def Heap.merge (le : α → α → Bool) : Heap α → Heap α → Heap α
| .nil, .nil => .nil
| .nil, .node a₂ c₂ _ => .node a₂ c₂ .nil
| .node a₁ c₁ _, .nil => .node a₁ c₁ .nil
| .node a₁ c₁ _, .node a₂ c₂ _ =>
if le a₁ a₂ then .node a₁ (.node a₂ c₂ c₁) .nil else .node a₂ (.node a₁ c₁ c₂) .nil
@[specialize] def Heap.combine (le : α → α → Bool) : Heap α → Heap α
| h₁@(.node _ _ h₂@(.node _ _ s)) => merge le (merge le h₁ h₂) (s.combine le)
| h => h
@[inline] def Heap.headD (a : α) : Heap α → α
| .nil => a
| .node a _ _ => a
@[inline] def Heap.head? : Heap α → Option α
| .nil => none
| .node a _ _ => some a
@[inline] def Heap.deleteMin (le : α → α → Bool) : Heap α → Option (α × Heap α)
| .nil => none
| .node a c _ => (a, combine le c)
@[inline] def Heap.tail? (le : α → α → Bool) (h : Heap α) : Option (Heap α) :=
deleteMin le h |>.map (·.snd)
@[inline] def Heap.tail (le : α → α → Bool) (h : Heap α) : Heap α :=
tail? le h |>.getD .nil
inductive Heap.NoSibling : Heap α → Prop
| nil : NoSibling .nil
| node (a c) : NoSibling (.node a c .nil)
instance : Decidable (Heap.NoSibling s) :=
match s with
| .nil => isTrue .nil
| .node a c .nil => isTrue (.node a c)
| .node _ _ (.node _ _ _) => isFalse nofun
theorem Heap.noSibling_merge (le) (s₁ s₂ : Heap α) :
(s₁.merge le s₂).NoSibling := by
unfold merge
(split <;> try split) <;> constructor
theorem Heap.noSibling_combine (le) (s : Heap α) :
(s.combine le).NoSibling := by
unfold combine; split
· exact noSibling_merge _ _ _
· match s with
| nil | node _ _ nil => constructor
| node _ _ (node _ _ s) => rename_i h; exact (h _ _ _ _ _ rfl).elim
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/PairingHeap.lean | 103 | 105 | theorem Heap.noSibling_deleteMin {s : Heap α} (eq : s.deleteMin le = some (a, s')) :
s'.NoSibling := by |
cases s with cases eq | node a c => exact noSibling_combine _ _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Two
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
#align_import data.nat.totient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5cc2dfdd3e92f340411acea4427d701dc7ed26f8"
open Finset
namespace Nat
def totient (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
((range n).filter n.Coprime).card
#align nat.totient Nat.totient
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "φ" => Nat.totient
@[simp]
theorem totient_zero : φ 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_zero Nat.totient_zero
@[simp]
theorem totient_one : φ 1 = 1 := rfl
#align nat.totient_one Nat.totient_one
theorem totient_eq_card_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = ((range n).filter n.Coprime).card :=
rfl
#align nat.totient_eq_card_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_coprime
theorem totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime (n : ℕ) : φ n = Nat.card { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } := by
let e : { m | m < n ∧ n.Coprime m } ≃ Finset.filter n.Coprime (Finset.range n) :=
{ toFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
invFun := fun m => ⟨m, by simpa only [Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range] using m.property⟩
left_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta]
right_inv := fun m => by simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Subtype.coe_eta] }
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, card_congr e, card_eq_fintype_card, Fintype.card_coe]
#align nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime Nat.totient_eq_card_lt_and_coprime
theorem totient_le (n : ℕ) : φ n ≤ n :=
((range n).card_filter_le _).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_le Nat.totient_le
theorem totient_lt (n : ℕ) (hn : 1 < n) : φ n < n :=
(card_lt_card (filter_ssubset.2 ⟨0, by simp [hn.ne', pos_of_gt hn]⟩)).trans_eq (card_range n)
#align nat.totient_lt Nat.totient_lt
@[simp]
theorem totient_eq_zero : ∀ {n : ℕ}, φ n = 0 ↔ n = 0
| 0 => by decide
| n + 1 =>
suffices ∃ x < n + 1, (n + 1).gcd x = 1 by simpa [totient, filter_eq_empty_iff]
⟨1 % (n + 1), mod_lt _ n.succ_pos, by rw [gcd_comm, ← gcd_rec, gcd_one_right]⟩
@[simp] theorem totient_pos {n : ℕ} : 0 < φ n ↔ 0 < n := by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_pos Nat.totient_pos
theorem filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient (a n : ℕ) :
((Ico n (n + a)).filter (Coprime a)).card = totient a := by
rw [totient, filter_Ico_card_eq_of_periodic, count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact periodic_coprime a
#align nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient Nat.filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient
theorem Ico_filter_coprime_le {a : ℕ} (k n : ℕ) (a_pos : 0 < a) :
((Ico k (k + n)).filter (Coprime a)).card ≤ totient a * (n / a + 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n a]
induction' n / a with i ih
· rw [← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a k]
simp only [add_zero, mul_one, mul_zero, le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos),
Nat.zero_eq, zero_add]
-- Porting note: below line was `mono`
refine Finset.card_mono ?_
refine monotone_filter_left a.Coprime ?_
simp only [Finset.le_eq_subset]
exact Ico_subset_Ico rfl.le (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt (mod_lt n a_pos)) k)
simp only [mul_succ]
simp_rw [← add_assoc] at ih ⊢
calc
(filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card = (filter a.Coprime
(Ico k (k + n % a + a * i) ∪ Ico (k + n % a + a * i) (k + n % a + a * i + a))).card := by
congr
rw [Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico]
· rw [add_assoc]
exact le_self_add
exact le_self_add
_ ≤ (filter a.Coprime (Ico k (k + n % a + a * i))).card + a.totient := by
rw [filter_union, ← filter_coprime_Ico_eq_totient a (k + n % a + a * i)]
apply card_union_le
_ ≤ a.totient * i + a.totient + a.totient := add_le_add_right ih (totient a)
#align nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le Nat.Ico_filter_coprime_le
open ZMod
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ZMod.card_units_eq_totient (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] [Fintype (ZMod n)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = φ n :=
calc
Fintype.card (ZMod n)ˣ = Fintype.card { x : ZMod n // x.val.Coprime n } :=
Fintype.card_congr ZMod.unitsEquivCoprime
_ = φ n := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ : ∃ m, n = m + 1 := exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero NeZero.out
simp only [totient, Finset.card_eq_sum_ones, Fintype.card_subtype, Finset.sum_filter, ←
Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range, @Nat.coprime_comm (m + 1)]
rfl
#align zmod.card_units_eq_totient ZMod.card_units_eq_totient
theorem totient_even {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 < n) : Even n.totient := by
haveI : Fact (1 < n) := ⟨one_lt_two.trans hn⟩
haveI : NeZero n := NeZero.of_gt hn
suffices 2 = orderOf (-1 : (ZMod n)ˣ) by
rw [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, even_iff_two_dvd, this]
exact orderOf_dvd_card
rw [← orderOf_units, Units.coe_neg_one, orderOf_neg_one, ringChar.eq (ZMod n) n, if_neg hn.ne']
#align nat.totient_even Nat.totient_even
theorem totient_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : m.Coprime n) : φ (m * n) = φ m * φ n :=
if hmn0 : m * n = 0 then by
cases' Nat.mul_eq_zero.1 hmn0 with h h <;>
simp only [totient_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul, h]
else by
haveI : NeZero (m * n) := ⟨hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero m := ⟨left_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
haveI : NeZero n := ⟨right_ne_zero_of_mul hmn0⟩
simp only [← ZMod.card_units_eq_totient]
rw [Fintype.card_congr (Units.mapEquiv (ZMod.chineseRemainder h).toMulEquiv).toEquiv,
Fintype.card_congr (@MulEquiv.prodUnits (ZMod m) (ZMod n) _ _).toEquiv, Fintype.card_prod]
#align nat.totient_mul Nat.totient_mul
theorem totient_div_of_dvd {n d : ℕ} (hnd : d ∣ n) :
φ (n / d) = (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
rcases d.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hd0); · simp [eq_zero_of_zero_dvd hnd]
rcases hnd with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left x hd0]
apply Finset.card_bij fun k _ => d * k
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, and_imp, Coprime]
refine fun a ha1 ha2 => ⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).2 ha1, ?_⟩
rw [gcd_mul_left, ha2, mul_one]
· simp [hd0.ne']
· simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, exists_prop, and_imp]
refine fun b hb1 hb2 => ?_
have : d ∣ b := by
rw [← hb2]
apply gcd_dvd_right
rcases this with ⟨q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨q, ⟨⟨(mul_lt_mul_left hd0).1 hb1, ?_⟩, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [gcd_mul_left, mul_right_eq_self_iff hd0] at hb2
#align nat.totient_div_of_dvd Nat.totient_div_of_dvd
theorem sum_totient (n : ℕ) : n.divisors.sum φ = n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [← sum_div_divisors n φ]
have : n = ∑ d ∈ n.divisors, (filter (fun k : ℕ => n.gcd k = d) (range n)).card := by
nth_rw 1 [← card_range n]
refine card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise fun x _ => mem_divisors.2 ⟨?_, hn.ne'⟩
apply gcd_dvd_left
nth_rw 3 [this]
exact sum_congr rfl fun x hx => totient_div_of_dvd (dvd_of_mem_divisors hx)
#align nat.sum_totient Nat.sum_totient
theorem sum_totient' (n : ℕ) : (∑ m ∈ (range n.succ).filter (· ∣ n), φ m) = n := by
convert sum_totient _ using 1
simp only [Nat.divisors, sum_filter, range_eq_Ico]
rw [sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot] <;> simp
#align nat.sum_totient' Nat.sum_totient'
theorem totient_prime_pow_succ {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (n : ℕ) : φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = p ^ n * (p - 1) :=
calc
φ (p ^ (n + 1)) = ((range (p ^ (n + 1))).filter (Coprime (p ^ (n + 1)))).card :=
totient_eq_card_coprime _
_ = (range (p ^ (n + 1)) \ (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p)).card :=
(congr_arg card
(by
rw [sdiff_eq_filter]
apply filter_congr
simp only [mem_range, mem_filter, coprime_pow_left_iff n.succ_pos, mem_image, not_exists,
hp.coprime_iff_not_dvd]
intro a ha
constructor
· intro hap b h; rcases h with ⟨_, rfl⟩
exact hap (dvd_mul_left _ _)
· rintro h ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [pow_succ'] at ha
exact h b ⟨lt_of_mul_lt_mul_left ha (zero_le _), mul_comm _ _⟩))
_ = _ := by
have h1 : Function.Injective (· * p) := mul_left_injective₀ hp.ne_zero
have h2 : (range (p ^ n)).image (· * p) ⊆ range (p ^ (n + 1)) := fun a => by
simp only [mem_image, mem_range, exists_imp]
rintro b ⟨h, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.pow_succ]
exact (mul_lt_mul_right hp.pos).2 h
rw [card_sdiff h2, Finset.card_image_of_injective _ h1, card_range, card_range, ←
one_mul (p ^ n), pow_succ', ← tsub_mul, one_mul, mul_comm]
#align nat.totient_prime_pow_succ Nat.totient_prime_pow_succ
theorem totient_prime_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
φ (p ^ n) = p ^ (n - 1) * (p - 1) := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 hn) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact totient_prime_pow_succ hp _
#align nat.totient_prime_pow Nat.totient_prime_pow
theorem totient_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : φ p = p - 1 := by
rw [← pow_one p, totient_prime_pow hp] <;> simp
#align nat.totient_prime Nat.totient_prime
theorem totient_eq_iff_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) : p.totient = p - 1 ↔ p.Prime := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, totient_prime⟩
replace hp : 1 < p := by
apply lt_of_le_of_ne
· rwa [succ_le_iff]
· rintro rfl
rw [totient_one, tsub_self] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
rw [totient_eq_card_coprime, range_eq_Ico, ← Ico_insert_succ_left hp.le, Finset.filter_insert,
if_neg (not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd hp (dvd_refl p) (dvd_zero p)), ← Nat.card_Ico 1 p] at h
refine
p.prime_of_coprime hp fun n hn hnz => Finset.filter_card_eq h n <| Finset.mem_Ico.mpr ⟨?_, hn⟩
rwa [succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align nat.totient_eq_iff_prime Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime
theorem card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one {p : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ ≤ p - 1 := by
haveI : NeZero p := ⟨(pos_of_gt hp).ne'⟩
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient p]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Nat.totient_lt p hp)
#align nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one Nat.card_units_zmod_lt_sub_one
theorem prime_iff_card_units (p : ℕ) [Fintype (ZMod p)ˣ] :
p.Prime ↔ Fintype.card (ZMod p)ˣ = p - 1 := by
cases' eq_zero_or_neZero p with hp hp
· subst hp
simp only [ZMod, not_prime_zero, false_iff_iff, zero_tsub]
-- the subst created a non-defeq but subsingleton instance diamond; resolve it
suffices Fintype.card ℤˣ ≠ 0 by convert this
simp
rw [ZMod.card_units_eq_totient, Nat.totient_eq_iff_prime <| NeZero.pos p]
#align nat.prime_iff_card_units Nat.prime_iff_card_units
@[simp]
theorem totient_two : φ 2 = 1 :=
(totient_prime prime_two).trans rfl
#align nat.totient_two Nat.totient_two
theorem totient_eq_one_iff : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n.totient = 1 ↔ n = 1 ∨ n = 2
| 0 => by simp
| 1 => by simp
| 2 => by simp
| n + 3 => by
have : 3 ≤ n + 3 := le_add_self
simp only [succ_succ_ne_one, false_or_iff]
exact ⟨fun h => not_even_one.elim <| h ▸ totient_even this, by rintro ⟨⟩⟩
#align nat.totient_eq_one_iff Nat.totient_eq_one_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Totient.lean | 279 | 280 | theorem dvd_two_of_totient_le_one {a : ℕ} (han : 0 < a) (ha : a.totient ≤ 1) : a ∣ 2 := by |
rcases totient_eq_one_iff.mp <| le_antisymm ha <| totient_pos.2 han with rfl | rfl <;> norm_num
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.NonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.UniversalEnveloping
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import algebra.lie.free from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"841ac1a3d9162bf51c6327812ecb6e5e71883ac4"
universe u v w
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) (X : Type v) [CommRing R]
local notation "lib" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra
local notation "lib.lift" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift
local notation "lib.of" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.of
local notation "lib.lift_of_apply" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift_of_apply
local notation "lib.lift_comp_of" => FreeNonUnitalNonAssocAlgebra.lift_comp_of
namespace FreeLieAlgebra
inductive Rel : lib R X → lib R X → Prop
| lie_self (a : lib R X) : Rel (a * a) 0
| leibniz_lie (a b c : lib R X) : Rel (a * (b * c)) (a * b * c + b * (a * c))
| smul (t : R) {a b : lib R X} : Rel a b → Rel (t • a) (t • b)
| add_right {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) : Rel a b → Rel (a + c) (b + c)
| mul_left (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} : Rel b c → Rel (a * b) (a * c)
| mul_right {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) : Rel a b → Rel (a * c) (b * c)
#align free_lie_algebra.rel FreeLieAlgebra.Rel
variable {R X}
theorem Rel.addLeft (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} (h : Rel R X b c) : Rel R X (a + b) (a + c) := by
rw [add_comm _ b, add_comm _ c]; exact h.add_right _
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.add_left FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.addLeft
theorem Rel.neg {a b : lib R X} (h : Rel R X a b) : Rel R X (-a) (-b) := by
simpa only [neg_one_smul] using h.smul (-1)
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.neg FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.neg
theorem Rel.subLeft (a : lib R X) {b c : lib R X} (h : Rel R X b c) : Rel R X (a - b) (a - c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg.addLeft a
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.sub_left FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.subLeft
theorem Rel.subRight {a b : lib R X} (c : lib R X) (h : Rel R X a b) : Rel R X (a - c) (b - c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_right (-c)
#align free_lie_algebra.rel.sub_right FreeLieAlgebra.Rel.subRight
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Free.lean | 103 | 106 | theorem Rel.smulOfTower {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (t : S)
(a b : lib R X) (h : Rel R X a b) : Rel R X (t • a) (t • b) := by |
rw [← smul_one_smul R t a, ← smul_one_smul R t b]
exact h.smul _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
namespace Polynomial
section MulActionWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (p : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ]
[MulActionWithZero R S] (x : S)
def smul_pow : ℕ → R → S := fun n r => r • x^n
irreducible_def smeval : S := p.sum (smul_pow x)
theorem smeval_eq_sum : p.smeval x = p.sum (smul_pow x) := by rw [smeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_C : (C r).smeval x = r • x ^ 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_C_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r).smeval x = r • x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Smeval.lean | 65 | 67 | theorem eval_eq_smeval : p.eval r = p.smeval r := by |
rw [eval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' (x y : V) (h : angle x y = π / 2) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y).2 h
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' InnerProductGeometry.norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq'
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero]
exact inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' (x y : V) (h : angle x y = π / 2) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y).2 h
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq' InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq'
theorem angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [angle, inner_add_right, h, add_zero, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases hx : ‖x‖ = 0; · simp [hx]
rw [div_mul_eq_div_div, mul_self_div_self]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
theorem angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hxy : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 ≠ 0 := by
rw [pow_two, norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h, ne_comm]
refine ne_of_lt ?_
rcases h0 with (h0 | h0)
· exact
Left.add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)) (mul_self_nonneg _)
· exact
Left.add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0))
rw [angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero h,
Real.arccos_eq_arcsin (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)), div_pow, one_sub_div hxy]
nth_rw 1 [pow_two]
rw [norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real h, pow_two, add_sub_cancel_left, ← pow_two, ← div_pow,
Real.sqrt_sq (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _))]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/RightAngle.lean | 95 | 101 | theorem angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) (h0 : x ≠ 0) :
angle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by |
rw [angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero h (Or.inl h0), Real.arctan_eq_arcsin, ←
div_mul_eq_div_div, norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero.2 h]
nth_rw 3 [← Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg x)]
rw_mod_cast [← Real.sqrt_mul (sq_nonneg _), div_pow, pow_two, pow_two, mul_add, mul_one, mul_div,
mul_comm (‖x‖ * ‖x‖), ← mul_div, div_self (mul_self_pos.2 (norm_ne_zero_iff.2 h0)).ne', mul_one]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Dedup
#align_import data.multiset.bind from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
universe v
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ δ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
def join : Multiset (Multiset α) → Multiset α :=
sum
#align multiset.join Multiset.join
theorem coe_join :
∀ L : List (List α), join (L.map ((↑) : List α → Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α)) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| l :: L => by
exact congr_arg (fun s : Multiset α => ↑l + s) (coe_join L)
#align multiset.coe_join Multiset.coe_join
@[simp]
theorem join_zero : @join α 0 = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.join_zero Multiset.join_zero
@[simp]
theorem join_cons (s S) : @join α (s ::ₘ S) = s + join S :=
sum_cons _ _
#align multiset.join_cons Multiset.join_cons
@[simp]
theorem join_add (S T) : @join α (S + T) = join S + join T :=
sum_add _ _
#align multiset.join_add Multiset.join_add
@[simp]
theorem singleton_join (a) : join ({a} : Multiset (Multiset α)) = a :=
sum_singleton _
#align multiset.singleton_join Multiset.singleton_join
@[simp]
theorem mem_join {a S} : a ∈ @join α S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) <| by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_and_right, exists_or]
#align multiset.mem_join Multiset.mem_join
@[simp]
theorem card_join (S) : card (@join α S) = sum (map card S) :=
Multiset.induction_on S (by simp) (by simp)
#align multiset.card_join Multiset.card_join
@[simp]
theorem map_join (f : α → β) (S : Multiset (Multiset α)) :
map f (join S) = join (map (map f) S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_join [CommMonoid α] {S : Multiset (Multiset α)} :
prod (join S) = prod (map prod S) := by
induction S using Multiset.induction with
| empty => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
theorem rel_join {r : α → β → Prop} {s t} (h : Rel (Rel r) s t) : Rel r s.join t.join := by
induction h with
| zero => simp
| cons hab hst ih => simpa using hab.add ih
#align multiset.rel_join Multiset.rel_join
section Bind
variable (a : α) (s t : Multiset α) (f g : α → Multiset β)
def bind (s : Multiset α) (f : α → Multiset β) : Multiset β :=
(s.map f).join
#align multiset.bind Multiset.bind
@[simp]
theorem coe_bind (l : List α) (f : α → List β) : (@bind α β l fun a => f a) = l.bind f := by
rw [List.bind, ← coe_join, List.map_map]
rfl
#align multiset.coe_bind Multiset.coe_bind
@[simp]
theorem zero_bind : bind 0 f = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.zero_bind Multiset.zero_bind
@[simp]
theorem cons_bind : (a ::ₘ s).bind f = f a + s.bind f := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.cons_bind Multiset.cons_bind
@[simp]
theorem singleton_bind : bind {a} f = f a := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.singleton_bind Multiset.singleton_bind
@[simp]
theorem add_bind : (s + t).bind f = s.bind f + t.bind f := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.add_bind Multiset.add_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_zero : s.bind (fun _ => 0 : α → Multiset β) = 0 := by simp [bind, join, nsmul_zero]
#align multiset.bind_zero Multiset.bind_zero
@[simp]
theorem bind_add : (s.bind fun a => f a + g a) = s.bind f + s.bind g := by simp [bind, join]
#align multiset.bind_add Multiset.bind_add
@[simp]
theorem bind_cons (f : α → β) (g : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind fun a => f a ::ₘ g a) = map f s + s.bind g :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp)
(by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc])
#align multiset.bind_cons Multiset.bind_cons
@[simp]
theorem bind_singleton (f : α → β) : (s.bind fun x => ({f x} : Multiset β)) = map f s :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by rw [zero_bind, map_zero]) (by simp [singleton_add])
#align multiset.bind_singleton Multiset.bind_singleton
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind {b s} {f : α → Multiset β} : b ∈ bind s f ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ f a := by
simp [bind]
#align multiset.mem_bind Multiset.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem card_bind : card (s.bind f) = (s.map (card ∘ f)).sum := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.card_bind Multiset.card_bind
theorem bind_congr {f g : α → Multiset β} {m : Multiset α} :
(∀ a ∈ m, f a = g a) → bind m f = bind m g := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [bind]
#align multiset.bind_congr Multiset.bind_congr
theorem bind_hcongr {β' : Type v} {m : Multiset α} {f : α → Multiset β} {f' : α → Multiset β'}
(h : β = β') (hf : ∀ a ∈ m, HEq (f a) (f' a)) : HEq (bind m f) (bind m f') := by
subst h
simp only [heq_eq_eq] at hf
simp [bind_congr hf]
#align multiset.bind_hcongr Multiset.bind_hcongr
theorem map_bind (m : Multiset α) (n : α → Multiset β) (f : β → γ) :
map f (bind m n) = bind m fun a => map f (n a) := by simp [bind]
#align multiset.map_bind Multiset.map_bind
theorem bind_map (m : Multiset α) (n : β → Multiset γ) (f : α → β) :
bind (map f m) n = bind m fun a => n (f a) :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align multiset.bind_map Multiset.bind_map
theorem bind_assoc {s : Multiset α} {f : α → Multiset β} {g : β → Multiset γ} :
(s.bind f).bind g = s.bind fun a => (f a).bind g :=
Multiset.induction_on s (by simp) (by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align multiset.bind_assoc Multiset.bind_assoc
theorem bind_bind (m : Multiset α) (n : Multiset β) {f : α → β → Multiset γ} :
((bind m) fun a => (bind n) fun b => f a b) = (bind n) fun b => (bind m) fun a => f a b :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align multiset.bind_bind Multiset.bind_bind
theorem bind_map_comm (m : Multiset α) (n : Multiset β) {f : α → β → γ} :
((bind m) fun a => n.map fun b => f a b) = (bind n) fun b => m.map fun a => f a b :=
Multiset.induction_on m (by simp) (by simp (config := { contextual := true }))
#align multiset.bind_map_comm Multiset.bind_map_comm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Bind.lean | 202 | 203 | theorem prod_bind [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (t : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind t).prod = (s.map fun a => (t a).prod).prod := by | simp [bind]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Sigma.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Sigma.Lex
import Mathlib.Order.Antichain
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import order.well_founded_set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c84c2c5496117349007d97104e7bbb471381592"
variable {ι α β γ : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
namespace Set
def WellFoundedOn (s : Set α) (r : α → α → Prop) : Prop :=
WellFounded fun a b : s => r a b
#align set.well_founded_on Set.WellFoundedOn
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_empty (r : α → α → Prop) : WellFoundedOn ∅ r :=
wellFounded_of_isEmpty _
#align set.well_founded_on_empty Set.wellFoundedOn_empty
section WellFoundedOn
variable {r r' : α → α → Prop}
section AnyRel
variable {f : β → α} {s t : Set α} {x y : α}
theorem wellFoundedOn_iff :
s.WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded fun a b : α => r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by
have f : RelEmbedding (fun (a : s) (b : s) => r a b) fun a b : α => r a b ∧ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s :=
⟨⟨(↑), Subtype.coe_injective⟩, by simp⟩
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, f.wellFounded⟩
rw [WellFounded.wellFounded_iff_has_min]
intro t ht
by_cases hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty
· rw [← Subtype.preimage_coe_nonempty] at hst
rcases h.has_min (Subtype.val ⁻¹' t) hst with ⟨⟨m, ms⟩, mt, hm⟩
exact ⟨m, mt, fun x xt ⟨xm, xs, _⟩ => hm ⟨x, xs⟩ xt xm⟩
· rcases ht with ⟨m, mt⟩
exact ⟨m, mt, fun x _ ⟨_, _, ms⟩ => hst ⟨m, ⟨ms, mt⟩⟩⟩
#align set.well_founded_on_iff Set.wellFoundedOn_iff
@[simp]
theorem wellFoundedOn_univ : (univ : Set α).WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded r := by
simp [wellFoundedOn_iff]
#align set.well_founded_on_univ Set.wellFoundedOn_univ
theorem _root_.WellFounded.wellFoundedOn : WellFounded r → s.WellFoundedOn r :=
InvImage.wf _
#align well_founded.well_founded_on WellFounded.wellFoundedOn
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/WellFoundedSet.lean | 101 | 108 | theorem wellFoundedOn_range : (range f).WellFoundedOn r ↔ WellFounded (r on f) := by |
let f' : β → range f := fun c => ⟨f c, c, rfl⟩
refine ⟨fun h => (InvImage.wf f' h).mono fun c c' => id, fun h => ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨_, c, rfl⟩
refine Acc.of_downward_closed f' ?_ _ ?_
· rintro _ ⟨_, c', rfl⟩ -
exact ⟨c', rfl⟩
· exact h.apply _
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Variance
#align_import probability.moments from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"85453a2a14be8da64caf15ca50930cf4c6e5d8de"
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Real
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {p : ℕ} {μ : Measure Ω}
def moment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ :=
μ[X ^ p]
#align probability_theory.moment ProbabilityTheory.moment
def centralMoment (X : Ω → ℝ) (p : ℕ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ := by
have m := fun (x : Ω) => μ[X] -- Porting note: Lean deems `μ[(X - fun x => μ[X]) ^ p]` ambiguous
exact μ[(X - m) ^ p]
#align probability_theory.central_moment ProbabilityTheory.centralMoment
@[simp]
theorem moment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : moment 0 p μ = 0 := by
simp only [moment, hp, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const,
smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, integral_zero]
#align probability_theory.moment_zero ProbabilityTheory.moment_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Probability/Moments.lean | 68 | 70 | theorem centralMoment_zero (hp : p ≠ 0) : centralMoment 0 p μ = 0 := by |
simp only [centralMoment, hp, Pi.zero_apply, integral_const, smul_eq_mul,
mul_zero, zero_sub, Pi.pow_apply, Pi.neg_apply, neg_zero, zero_pow, Ne, not_false_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
#align_import data.pnat.prime from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"09597669f02422ed388036273d8848119699c22f"
namespace PNat
open Nat
def gcd (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left (m : ℕ) n.pos⟩
#align pnat.gcd PNat.gcd
def lcm (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), by
let h := mul_pos n.pos m.pos
rw [← gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), mul_comm] at h
exact pos_of_dvd_of_pos (Dvd.intro (Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ)) rfl) h⟩
#align pnat.lcm PNat.lcm
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem gcd_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (gcd n m : ℕ) = Nat.gcd n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.gcd_coe PNat.gcd_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lcm_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (lcm n m : ℕ) = Nat.lcm n m :=
rfl
#align pnat.lcm_coe PNat.lcm_coe
theorem gcd_dvd_left (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_left PNat.gcd_dvd_left
theorem gcd_dvd_right (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_dvd_right PNat.gcd_dvd_right
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : k ∣ m) (hn : k ∣ n) : k ∣ gcd m n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_gcd (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.dvd_gcd PNat.dvd_gcd
theorem dvd_lcm_left (n m : ℕ+) : n ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_left PNat.dvd_lcm_left
theorem dvd_lcm_right (n m : ℕ+) : m ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.dvd_lcm_right PNat.dvd_lcm_right
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : m ∣ k) (hn : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
dvd_iff.2 (@Nat.lcm_dvd (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
#align pnat.lcm_dvd PNat.lcm_dvd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m * lcm n m = n * m :=
Subtype.eq (Nat.gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
#align pnat.gcd_mul_lcm PNat.gcd_mul_lcm
theorem eq_one_of_lt_two {n : ℕ+} : n < 2 → n = 1 := by
intro h; apply le_antisymm; swap
· apply PNat.one_le
· exact PNat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h
#align pnat.eq_one_of_lt_two PNat.eq_one_of_lt_two
section Prime
def Prime (p : ℕ+) : Prop :=
(p : ℕ).Prime
#align pnat.prime PNat.Prime
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → 1 < p :=
Nat.Prime.one_lt
#align pnat.prime.one_lt PNat.Prime.one_lt
theorem prime_two : (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_two
#align pnat.prime_two PNat.prime_two
instance {p : ℕ+} [h : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime := h
instance fact_prime_two : Fact (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_two⟩
theorem prime_three : (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_three
instance fact_prime_three : Fact (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_three⟩
theorem prime_five : (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_five
instance fact_prime_five : Fact (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_five⟩
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ+} (pp : p.Prime) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
rw [PNat.dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.dvd_prime pp]
simp
#align pnat.dvd_prime PNat.dvd_prime
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → p ≠ 1 := by
intro pp
intro contra
apply Nat.Prime.ne_one pp
rw [PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
apply contra
#align pnat.prime.ne_one PNat.Prime.ne_one
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬(1 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.not_prime_one
#align pnat.not_prime_one PNat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → ¬p ∣ 1 := fun pp : p.Prime => by
rw [dvd_iff]
apply Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one pp
#align pnat.prime.not_dvd_one PNat.Prime.not_dvd_one
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Prime.lean | 168 | 170 | theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ+} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p : ℕ+, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by |
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd (mt coe_eq_one_iff.mp hn)
exists (⟨p, Nat.Prime.pos hp.left⟩ : ℕ+); rw [dvd_iff]; apply hp
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.dual from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"738c19f572805cff525a93aa4ffbdf232df05aa8"
open Matrix
section Transpose
variable {K V₁ V₂ ι₁ ι₂ : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K V₁] [AddCommGroup V₂]
[Module K V₂] [Fintype ι₁] [Fintype ι₂] [DecidableEq ι₁] [DecidableEq ι₂] {B₁ : Basis ι₁ K V₁}
{B₂ : Basis ι₂ K V₂}
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose (u : V₁ →ₗ[K] V₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix B₂.dualBasis B₁.dualBasis (Module.Dual.transpose (R := K) u) =
(LinearMap.toMatrix B₁ B₂ u)ᵀ := by
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Module.Dual.transpose_apply, B₁.dualBasis_repr,
B₂.dualBasis_apply, Matrix.transpose_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply]
#align linear_map.to_matrix_transpose LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Dual.lean | 41 | 44 | theorem Matrix.toLin_transpose (M : Matrix ι₁ ι₂ K) : Matrix.toLin B₁.dualBasis B₂.dualBasis Mᵀ =
Module.Dual.transpose (R := K) (Matrix.toLin B₂ B₁ M) := by |
apply (LinearMap.toMatrix B₁.dualBasis B₂.dualBasis).injective
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin, LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose, LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Spectrum
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.GeneralLinearGroup
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.eigenspace.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6b0169218d01f2837d79ea2784882009a0da1aa1"
universe u v w
namespace Module
namespace End
open FiniteDimensional Set
variable {K R : Type v} {V M : Type w} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Field K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
def eigenspace (f : End R M) (μ : R) : Submodule R M :=
LinearMap.ker (f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ)
#align module.End.eigenspace Module.End.eigenspace
@[simp]
theorem eigenspace_zero (f : End R M) : f.eigenspace 0 = LinearMap.ker f := by simp [eigenspace]
#align module.End.eigenspace_zero Module.End.eigenspace_zero
def HasEigenvector (f : End R M) (μ : R) (x : M) : Prop :=
x ∈ eigenspace f μ ∧ x ≠ 0
#align module.End.has_eigenvector Module.End.HasEigenvector
def HasEigenvalue (f : End R M) (a : R) : Prop :=
eigenspace f a ≠ ⊥
#align module.End.has_eigenvalue Module.End.HasEigenvalue
def Eigenvalues (f : End R M) : Type _ :=
{ μ : R // f.HasEigenvalue μ }
#align module.End.eigenvalues Module.End.Eigenvalues
@[coe]
def Eigenvalues.val (f : Module.End R M) : Eigenvalues f → R := Subtype.val
instance Eigenvalues.instCoeOut {f : Module.End R M} : CoeOut (Eigenvalues f) R where
coe := Eigenvalues.val f
instance Eigenvalues.instDecidableEq [DecidableEq R] (f : Module.End R M) :
DecidableEq (Eigenvalues f) :=
inferInstanceAs (DecidableEq (Subtype (fun x : R => HasEigenvalue f x)))
theorem hasEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvector {f : End R M} {μ : R} {x : M} (h : HasEigenvector f μ x) :
HasEigenvalue f μ := by
rw [HasEigenvalue, Submodule.ne_bot_iff]
use x; exact h
#align module.End.has_eigenvalue_of_has_eigenvector Module.End.hasEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvector
theorem mem_eigenspace_iff {f : End R M} {μ : R} {x : M} : x ∈ eigenspace f μ ↔ f x = μ • x := by
rw [eigenspace, LinearMap.mem_ker, LinearMap.sub_apply, algebraMap_end_apply, sub_eq_zero]
#align module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff Module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff
theorem HasEigenvector.apply_eq_smul {f : End R M} {μ : R} {x : M} (hx : f.HasEigenvector μ x) :
f x = μ • x :=
mem_eigenspace_iff.mp hx.1
#align module.End.has_eigenvector.apply_eq_smul Module.End.HasEigenvector.apply_eq_smul
theorem HasEigenvector.pow_apply {f : End R M} {μ : R} {v : M} (hv : f.HasEigenvector μ v) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n) v = μ ^ n • v := by
induction n <;> simp [*, pow_succ f, hv.apply_eq_smul, smul_smul, pow_succ' μ]
theorem HasEigenvalue.exists_hasEigenvector {f : End R M} {μ : R} (hμ : f.HasEigenvalue μ) :
∃ v, f.HasEigenvector μ v :=
Submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot hμ
#align module.End.has_eigenvalue.exists_has_eigenvector Module.End.HasEigenvalue.exists_hasEigenvector
lemma HasEigenvalue.pow {f : End R M} {μ : R} (h : f.HasEigenvalue μ) (n : ℕ) :
(f ^ n).HasEigenvalue (μ ^ n) := by
rw [HasEigenvalue, Submodule.ne_bot_iff]
obtain ⟨m : M, hm⟩ := h.exists_hasEigenvector
exact ⟨m, by simpa [mem_eigenspace_iff] using hm.pow_apply n, hm.2⟩
lemma HasEigenvalue.isNilpotent_of_isNilpotent [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {f : End R M}
(hfn : IsNilpotent f) {μ : R} (hf : f.HasEigenvalue μ) :
IsNilpotent μ := by
obtain ⟨m : M, hm⟩ := hf.exists_hasEigenvector
obtain ⟨n : ℕ, hn : f ^ n = 0⟩ := hfn
exact ⟨n, by simpa [hn, hm.2, eq_comm (a := (0 : M))] using hm.pow_apply n⟩
theorem HasEigenvalue.mem_spectrum {f : End R M} {μ : R} (hμ : HasEigenvalue f μ) :
μ ∈ spectrum R f := by
refine spectrum.mem_iff.mpr fun h_unit => ?_
set f' := LinearMap.GeneralLinearGroup.toLinearEquiv h_unit.unit
rcases hμ.exists_hasEigenvector with ⟨v, hv⟩
refine hv.2 ((LinearMap.ker_eq_bot'.mp f'.ker) v (?_ : μ • v - f v = 0))
rw [hv.apply_eq_smul, sub_self]
#align module.End.mem_spectrum_of_has_eigenvalue Module.End.HasEigenvalue.mem_spectrum
theorem hasEigenvalue_iff_mem_spectrum [FiniteDimensional K V] {f : End K V} {μ : K} :
f.HasEigenvalue μ ↔ μ ∈ spectrum K f := by
rw [spectrum.mem_iff, IsUnit.sub_iff, LinearMap.isUnit_iff_ker_eq_bot, HasEigenvalue, eigenspace]
#align module.End.has_eigenvalue_iff_mem_spectrum Module.End.hasEigenvalue_iff_mem_spectrum
alias ⟨_, HasEigenvalue.of_mem_spectrum⟩ := hasEigenvalue_iff_mem_spectrum
theorem eigenspace_div (f : End K V) (a b : K) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
eigenspace f (a / b) = LinearMap.ker (b • f - algebraMap K (End K V) a) :=
calc
eigenspace f (a / b) = eigenspace f (b⁻¹ * a) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
_ = LinearMap.ker (f - (b⁻¹ * a) • LinearMap.id) := by rw [eigenspace]; rfl
_ = LinearMap.ker (f - b⁻¹ • a • LinearMap.id) := by rw [smul_smul]
_ = LinearMap.ker (f - b⁻¹ • algebraMap K (End K V) a) := rfl
_ = LinearMap.ker (b • (f - b⁻¹ • algebraMap K (End K V) a)) := by
rw [LinearMap.ker_smul _ b hb]
_ = LinearMap.ker (b • f - algebraMap K (End K V) a) := by rw [smul_sub, smul_inv_smul₀ hb]
#align module.End.eigenspace_div Module.End.eigenspace_div
def genEigenspace (f : End R M) (μ : R) : ℕ →o Submodule R M where
toFun k := LinearMap.ker ((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ) ^ k)
monotone' k m hm := by
simp only [← pow_sub_mul_pow _ hm]
exact
LinearMap.ker_le_ker_comp ((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ) ^ k)
((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ) ^ (m - k))
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace Module.End.genEigenspace
@[simp]
theorem mem_genEigenspace (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) (m : M) :
m ∈ f.genEigenspace μ k ↔ ((f - μ • (1 : End R M)) ^ k) m = 0 := Iff.rfl
#align module.End.mem_generalized_eigenspace Module.End.mem_genEigenspace
@[simp]
theorem genEigenspace_zero (f : End R M) (k : ℕ) :
f.genEigenspace 0 k = LinearMap.ker (f ^ k) := by
simp [Module.End.genEigenspace]
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace_zero Module.End.genEigenspace_zero
def HasGenEigenvector (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) (x : M) : Prop :=
x ≠ 0 ∧ x ∈ genEigenspace f μ k
#align module.End.has_generalized_eigenvector Module.End.HasGenEigenvector
def HasGenEigenvalue (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) : Prop :=
genEigenspace f μ k ≠ ⊥
#align module.End.has_generalized_eigenvalue Module.End.HasGenEigenvalue
def genEigenrange (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) : Submodule R M :=
LinearMap.range ((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ) ^ k)
#align module.End.generalized_eigenrange Module.End.genEigenrange
theorem exp_ne_zero_of_hasGenEigenvalue {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ}
(h : f.HasGenEigenvalue μ k) : k ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact h LinearMap.ker_id
#align module.End.exp_ne_zero_of_has_generalized_eigenvalue Module.End.exp_ne_zero_of_hasGenEigenvalue
def maxGenEigenspace (f : End R M) (μ : R) : Submodule R M :=
⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k
#align module.End.maximal_generalized_eigenspace Module.End.maxGenEigenspace
theorem genEigenspace_le_maximal (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) :
f.genEigenspace μ k ≤ f.maxGenEigenspace μ :=
le_iSup _ _
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace_le_maximal Module.End.genEigenspace_le_maximal
@[simp]
theorem mem_maxGenEigenspace (f : End R M) (μ : R) (m : M) :
m ∈ f.maxGenEigenspace μ ↔ ∃ k : ℕ, ((f - μ • (1 : End R M)) ^ k) m = 0 := by
simp only [maxGenEigenspace, ← mem_genEigenspace, Submodule.mem_iSup_of_chain]
#align module.End.mem_maximal_generalized_eigenspace Module.End.mem_maxGenEigenspace
noncomputable def maxGenEigenspaceIndex (f : End R M) (μ : R) :=
monotonicSequenceLimitIndex (f.genEigenspace μ)
#align module.End.maximal_generalized_eigenspace_index Module.End.maxGenEigenspaceIndex
theorem maxGenEigenspace_eq [h : IsNoetherian R M] (f : End R M) (μ : R) :
maxGenEigenspace f μ =
f.genEigenspace μ (maxGenEigenspaceIndex f μ) := by
rw [isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded] at h
exact (WellFounded.iSup_eq_monotonicSequenceLimit h (f.genEigenspace μ) : _)
#align module.End.maximal_generalized_eigenspace_eq Module.End.maxGenEigenspace_eq
theorem hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue_of_le {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ}
{m : ℕ} (hm : k ≤ m) (hk : f.HasGenEigenvalue μ k) :
f.HasGenEigenvalue μ m := by
unfold HasGenEigenvalue at *
contrapose! hk
rw [← le_bot_iff, ← hk]
exact (f.genEigenspace μ).monotone hm
#align module.End.has_generalized_eigenvalue_of_has_generalized_eigenvalue_of_le Module.End.hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue_of_le
theorem eigenspace_le_genEigenspace {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) :
f.eigenspace μ ≤ f.genEigenspace μ k :=
(f.genEigenspace μ).monotone (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hk)
#align module.End.eigenspace_le_generalized_eigenspace Module.End.eigenspace_le_genEigenspace
theorem hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvalue {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k)
(hμ : f.HasEigenvalue μ) : f.HasGenEigenvalue μ k := by
apply hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue_of_le hk
rw [HasGenEigenvalue, genEigenspace, OrderHom.coe_mk, pow_one]
exact hμ
#align module.End.has_generalized_eigenvalue_of_has_eigenvalue Module.End.hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvalue
theorem hasEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ}
(hμ : f.HasGenEigenvalue μ k) : f.HasEigenvalue μ := by
intro contra; apply hμ
erw [LinearMap.ker_eq_bot] at contra ⊢; rw [LinearMap.coe_pow]
exact Function.Injective.iterate contra k
#align module.End.has_eigenvalue_of_has_generalized_eigenvalue Module.End.hasEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue
@[simp]
theorem hasGenEigenvalue_iff_hasEigenvalue {f : End R M} {μ : R} {k : ℕ} (hk : 0 < k) :
f.HasGenEigenvalue μ k ↔ f.HasEigenvalue μ :=
⟨hasEigenvalue_of_hasGenEigenvalue, hasGenEigenvalue_of_hasEigenvalue hk⟩
#align module.End.has_generalized_eigenvalue_iff_has_eigenvalue Module.End.hasGenEigenvalue_iff_hasEigenvalue
theorem genEigenspace_le_genEigenspace_finrank [FiniteDimensional K V] (f : End K V)
(μ : K) (k : ℕ) : f.genEigenspace μ k ≤ f.genEigenspace μ (finrank K V) :=
ker_pow_le_ker_pow_finrank _ _
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace_le_generalized_eigenspace_finrank Module.End.genEigenspace_le_genEigenspace_finrank
@[simp] theorem iSup_genEigenspace_eq_genEigenspace_finrank
[FiniteDimensional K V] (f : End K V) (μ : K) :
⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k = f.genEigenspace μ (finrank K V) :=
le_antisymm (iSup_le (genEigenspace_le_genEigenspace_finrank f μ)) (le_iSup _ _)
theorem genEigenspace_eq_genEigenspace_finrank_of_le [FiniteDimensional K V]
(f : End K V) (μ : K) {k : ℕ} (hk : finrank K V ≤ k) :
f.genEigenspace μ k = f.genEigenspace μ (finrank K V) :=
ker_pow_eq_ker_pow_finrank_of_le hk
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace_eq_generalized_eigenspace_finrank_of_le Module.End.genEigenspace_eq_genEigenspace_finrank_of_le
lemma mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm {f g : End R M} (h : Commute f g) (μ : R) (k : ℕ) :
MapsTo g (f.genEigenspace μ k) (f.genEigenspace μ k) := by
replace h : Commute ((f - μ • (1 : End R M)) ^ k) g :=
(h.sub_left <| Algebra.commute_algebraMap_left μ g).pow_left k
intro x hx
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_genEigenspace] at hx ⊢
rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, ← LinearMap.mul_eq_comp, h.eq, LinearMap.mul_eq_comp,
LinearMap.comp_apply, hx, map_zero]
lemma mapsTo_iSup_genEigenspace_of_comm {f g : End R M} (h : Commute f g) (μ : R) :
MapsTo g ↑(⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) ↑(⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) := by
simp only [MapsTo, Submodule.coe_iSup_of_chain, mem_iUnion, SetLike.mem_coe]
rintro x ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨k, f.mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm h μ k hk⟩
lemma isNilpotent_restrict_sub_algebraMap (f : End R M) (μ : R) (k : ℕ)
(h : MapsTo (f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ)
(f.genEigenspace μ k) (f.genEigenspace μ k) :=
mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ) μ k) :
IsNilpotent ((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ).restrict h) := by
use k
ext
simp [LinearMap.restrict_apply, LinearMap.pow_restrict _]
lemma isNilpotent_restrict_iSup_sub_algebraMap [IsNoetherian R M] (f : End R M) (μ : R)
(h : MapsTo (f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ)
↑(⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) ↑(⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) :=
mapsTo_iSup_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ) μ) :
IsNilpotent ((f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ).restrict h) := by
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ : ∃ l, ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k = f.genEigenspace μ l :=
⟨_, maxGenEigenspace_eq f μ⟩
use l
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa [hl, LinearMap.restrict_apply, LinearMap.pow_restrict _] using hx
lemma disjoint_genEigenspace [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : End R M) {μ₁ μ₂ : R} (hμ : μ₁ ≠ μ₂) (k l : ℕ) :
Disjoint (f.genEigenspace μ₁ k) (f.genEigenspace μ₂ l) := by
nontriviality M
have := NoZeroSMulDivisors.isReduced R M
rw [disjoint_iff]
set p := f.genEigenspace μ₁ k ⊓ f.genEigenspace μ₂ l
by_contra hp
replace hp : Nontrivial p := Submodule.nontrivial_iff_ne_bot.mpr hp
let f₁ : End R p := (f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ₁).restrict <| MapsTo.inter_inter
(mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ₁) μ₁ k)
(mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ₁) μ₂ l)
let f₂ : End R p := (f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ₂).restrict <| MapsTo.inter_inter
(mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ₂) μ₁ k)
(mapsTo_genEigenspace_of_comm (Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_commutes f μ₂) μ₂ l)
have : IsNilpotent (f₂ - f₁) := by
apply Commute.isNilpotent_sub (x := f₂) (y := f₁) _ ⟨l, ?_⟩ ⟨k, ?_⟩
· ext; simp [f₁, f₂, smul_sub, sub_sub, smul_comm μ₁, add_sub_left_comm]
all_goals ext ⟨x, _, _⟩; simpa [LinearMap.restrict_apply, LinearMap.pow_restrict _] using ‹_›
have hf₁₂ : f₂ - f₁ = algebraMap R (End R p) (μ₁ - μ₂) := by ext; simp [f₁, f₂, sub_smul]
rw [hf₁₂, IsNilpotent.map_iff (NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective R (End R p)),
isNilpotent_iff_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero] at this
contradiction
lemma disjoint_iSup_genEigenspace [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : End R M) {μ₁ μ₂ : R} (hμ : μ₁ ≠ μ₂) :
Disjoint (⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ₁ k) (⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ₂ k) := by
simp_rw [(f.genEigenspace μ₁).mono.directed_le.disjoint_iSup_left,
(f.genEigenspace μ₂).mono.directed_le.disjoint_iSup_right]
exact disjoint_genEigenspace f hμ
lemma injOn_genEigenspace [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (f : End R M) :
InjOn (⨆ k, f.genEigenspace · k) {μ | ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k ≠ ⊥} := by
rintro μ₁ _ μ₂ hμ₂ (hμ₁₂ : ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ₁ k = ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ₂ k)
by_contra contra
apply hμ₂
simpa only [hμ₁₂, disjoint_self] using f.disjoint_iSup_genEigenspace contra
theorem independent_genEigenspace [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (f : End R M) :
CompleteLattice.Independent (fun μ ↦ ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) := by
classical
suffices ∀ μ (s : Finset R), μ ∉ s → Disjoint (⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k)
(s.sup fun μ ↦ ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k) by
simp_rw [CompleteLattice.independent_iff_supIndep_of_injOn f.injOn_genEigenspace,
Finset.supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase]
exact fun s μ _ ↦ this _ _ (s.not_mem_erase μ)
intro μ₁ s
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with μ₂ s _ ih
· simp
intro hμ₁₂
obtain ⟨hμ₁₂ : μ₁ ≠ μ₂, hμ₁ : μ₁ ∉ s⟩ := by rwa [Finset.mem_insert, not_or] at hμ₁₂
specialize ih hμ₁
rw [Finset.sup_insert, disjoint_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
rintro x ⟨hx, hx'⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe] at hx hx'
suffices x ∈ ⨆ k, genEigenspace f μ₂ k by
rw [← Submodule.mem_bot (R := R), ← (f.disjoint_iSup_genEigenspace hμ₁₂).eq_bot]
exact ⟨hx, this⟩
obtain ⟨y, hy, z, hz, rfl⟩ := Submodule.mem_sup.mp hx'; clear hx'
let g := f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ₂
obtain ⟨k : ℕ, hk : (g ^ k) y = 0⟩ := by simpa using hy
have hyz : (g ^ k) (y + z) ∈
(⨆ k, genEigenspace f μ₁ k) ⊓ s.sup fun μ ↦ ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k := by
refine ⟨f.mapsTo_iSup_genEigenspace_of_comm ?_ μ₁ hx, ?_⟩
· exact Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_pow_commutes f μ₂ k
· rw [SetLike.mem_coe, map_add, hk, zero_add]
suffices (s.sup fun μ ↦ ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k).map (g ^ k) ≤
s.sup fun μ ↦ ⨆ k, f.genEigenspace μ k by exact this (Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hz)
simp_rw [Finset.sup_eq_iSup, Submodule.map_iSup (ι := R), Submodule.map_iSup (ι := _ ∈ s)]
refine iSup₂_mono fun μ _ ↦ ?_
rintro - ⟨u, hu, rfl⟩
refine f.mapsTo_iSup_genEigenspace_of_comm ?_ μ hu
exact Algebra.mul_sub_algebraMap_pow_commutes f μ₂ k
rw [ih.eq_bot, Submodule.mem_bot] at hyz
simp_rw [Submodule.mem_iSup_of_chain, mem_genEigenspace]
exact ⟨k, hyz⟩
theorem eigenspaces_independent [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (f : End R M) :
CompleteLattice.Independent f.eigenspace :=
f.independent_genEigenspace.mono fun μ ↦ le_iSup (genEigenspace f μ) 1
theorem eigenvectors_linearIndependent [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : End R M) (μs : Set R) (xs : μs → M)
(h_eigenvec : ∀ μ : μs, f.HasEigenvector μ (xs μ)) : LinearIndependent R xs :=
CompleteLattice.Independent.linearIndependent _
(f.eigenspaces_independent.comp Subtype.coe_injective) (fun μ => (h_eigenvec μ).1) fun μ =>
(h_eigenvec μ).2
#align module.End.eigenvectors_linear_independent Module.End.eigenvectors_linearIndependent
theorem genEigenspace_restrict (f : End R M) (p : Submodule R M) (k : ℕ) (μ : R)
(hfp : ∀ x : M, x ∈ p → f x ∈ p) :
genEigenspace (LinearMap.restrict f hfp) μ k =
Submodule.comap p.subtype (f.genEigenspace μ k) := by
simp only [genEigenspace, OrderHom.coe_mk, ← LinearMap.ker_comp]
induction' k with k ih
· rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, LinearMap.one_eq_id]
apply (Submodule.ker_subtype _).symm
· erw [pow_succ, pow_succ, LinearMap.ker_comp, LinearMap.ker_comp, ih, ← LinearMap.ker_comp,
LinearMap.comp_assoc]
#align module.End.generalized_eigenspace_restrict Module.End.genEigenspace_restrict
lemma _root_.Submodule.inf_genEigenspace (f : End R M) (p : Submodule R M) {k : ℕ} {μ : R}
(hfp : ∀ x : M, x ∈ p → f x ∈ p) :
p ⊓ f.genEigenspace μ k =
(genEigenspace (LinearMap.restrict f hfp) μ k).map p.subtype := by
rw [f.genEigenspace_restrict _ _ _ hfp, Submodule.map_comap_eq, Submodule.range_subtype]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Eigenspace/Basic.lean | 460 | 464 | theorem eigenspace_restrict_le_eigenspace (f : End R M) {p : Submodule R M} (hfp : ∀ x ∈ p, f x ∈ p)
(μ : R) : (eigenspace (f.restrict hfp) μ).map p.subtype ≤ f.eigenspace μ := by |
rintro a ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_eigenspace_iff, LinearMap.restrict_apply] at hx ⊢
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hx
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
#align_import data.multiset.powerset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Write a more efficient version
def powersetAux (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists l).map (↑)
#align multiset.powerset_aux Multiset.powersetAux
theorem powersetAux_eq_map_coe {l : List α} : powersetAux l = (sublists l).map (↑) :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux_eq_map_coe Multiset.powersetAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetAux {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetAux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp [powersetAux_eq_map_coe, Subperm, and_comm]
#align multiset.mem_powerset_aux Multiset.mem_powersetAux
def powersetAux' (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists' l).map (↑)
#align multiset.powerset_aux' Multiset.powersetAux'
theorem powersetAux_perm_powersetAux' {l : List α} : powersetAux l ~ powersetAux' l := by
rw [powersetAux_eq_map_coe]; exact (sublists_perm_sublists' _).map _
#align multiset.powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux' Multiset.powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_nil : powersetAux' (@nil α) = [0] :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_nil Multiset.powersetAux'_nil
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
powersetAux' (a :: l) = powersetAux' l ++ List.map (cons a) (powersetAux' l) := by
simp only [powersetAux', sublists'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_cancel_left_eq]; rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_cons Multiset.powersetAux'_cons
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux' l₁ ~ powersetAux' l₂ := by
induction' p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ _ _ IH₁ IH₂
· simp
· simp only [powersetAux'_cons]
exact IH.append (IH.map _)
· simp only [powersetAux'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_assoc]
apply Perm.append_left
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
· exact IH₁.trans IH₂
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_perm Multiset.powerset_aux'_perm
theorem powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux l₁ ~ powersetAux l₂ :=
powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.trans <|
(powerset_aux'_perm p).trans powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.symm
#align multiset.powerset_aux_perm Multiset.powersetAux_perm
--Porting note (#11083): slightly slower implementation due to `map ofList`
def powerset (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s
(fun l => (powersetAux l : Multiset (Multiset α)))
(fun _ _ h => Quot.sound (powersetAux_perm h))
#align multiset.powerset Multiset.powerset
theorem powerset_coe (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
congr_arg ((↑) : List (Multiset α) → Multiset (Multiset α)) powersetAux_eq_map_coe
#align multiset.powerset_coe Multiset.powerset_coe
@[simp]
theorem powerset_coe' (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists' l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
Quot.sound powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
#align multiset.powerset_coe' Multiset.powerset_coe'
@[simp]
theorem powerset_zero : @powerset α 0 = {0} :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_zero Multiset.powerset_zero
@[simp]
theorem powerset_cons (a : α) (s) : powerset (a ::ₘ s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, cons_coe, powerset_coe', sublists'_cons, map_append, List.map_map,
map_coe, coe_add, coe_eq_coe]; rfl
#align multiset.powerset_cons Multiset.powerset_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {s t : Multiset α} : s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t <| by simp [Subperm, and_comm]
#align multiset.mem_powerset Multiset.mem_powerset
theorem map_single_le_powerset (s : Multiset α) : s.map singleton ≤ powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [powerset_coe, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_le, map_coe]
show l.map (((↑) : List α → Multiset α) ∘ pure) <+~ (sublists l).map (↑)
rw [← List.map_map]
exact ((map_pure_sublist_sublists _).map _).subperm
#align multiset.map_single_le_powerset Multiset.map_single_le_powerset
@[simp]
theorem card_powerset (s : Multiset α) : card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp
#align multiset.card_powerset Multiset.card_powerset
theorem revzip_powersetAux {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux l)) : x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux_eq_map_coe, ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists _ _ _ h)
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux Multiset.revzip_powersetAux
theorem revzip_powersetAux' {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux' l)) :
x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux', ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists' _ _ _ h)
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux' Multiset.revzip_powersetAux'
theorem revzip_powersetAux_lemma {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {l' : List (Multiset α)}
(H : ∀ ⦃x : _ × _⦄, x ∈ revzip l' → x.1 + x.2 = ↑l) :
revzip l' = l'.map fun x => (x, (l : Multiset α) - x) := by
have :
Forall₂ (fun (p : Multiset α × Multiset α) (s : Multiset α) => p = (s, ↑l - s)) (revzip l')
((revzip l').map Prod.fst) := by
rw [forall₂_map_right_iff, forall₂_same]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ h
dsimp
rw [← H h, add_tsub_cancel_left]
rw [← forall₂_eq_eq_eq, forall₂_map_right_iff]
simpa using this
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux_lemma Multiset.revzip_powersetAux_lemma
theorem revzip_powersetAux_perm_aux' {l : List α} :
revzip (powersetAux l) ~ revzip (powersetAux' l) := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux']
exact powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.map _
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux_perm_aux' Multiset.revzip_powersetAux_perm_aux'
theorem revzip_powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) :
revzip (powersetAux l₁) ~ revzip (powersetAux l₂) := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
simp only [fun l : List α => revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, coe_eq_coe.2 p,
ge_iff_le]
exact (powersetAux_perm p).map _
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux_perm Multiset.revzip_powersetAux_perm
def powersetCardAux (n : ℕ) (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
sublistsLenAux n l (↑) []
#align multiset.powerset_len_aux Multiset.powersetCardAux
theorem powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe {n} {l : List α} :
powersetCardAux n l = (sublistsLen n l).map (↑) := by
rw [powersetCardAux, sublistsLenAux_eq, append_nil]
#align multiset.powerset_len_aux_eq_map_coe Multiset.powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetCardAux {n} {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetCardAux n l ↔ s ≤ ↑l ∧ card s = n :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe, List.mem_map, mem_sublistsLen,
coe_eq_coe, coe_le, Subperm, exists_prop, coe_card]
exact fun l₁ =>
⟨fun ⟨l₂, ⟨s, e⟩, p⟩ => ⟨⟨_, p, s⟩, p.symm.length_eq.trans e⟩,
fun ⟨⟨l₂, p, s⟩, e⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨s, p.length_eq.trans e⟩, p⟩⟩
#align multiset.mem_powerset_len_aux Multiset.mem_powersetCardAux
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Powerset.lean | 194 | 195 | theorem powersetCardAux_zero (l : List α) : powersetCardAux 0 l = [0] := by |
simp [powersetCardAux_eq_map_coe]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Ordinal
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.NaturalOps
#align_import set_theory.game.birthday from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a347076985674932c0e91da09b9961ed0a79508c"
universe u
open Ordinal
namespace SetTheory
open scoped NaturalOps PGame
namespace PGame
noncomputable def birthday : PGame.{u} → Ordinal.{u}
| ⟨_, _, xL, xR⟩ =>
max (lsub.{u, u} fun i => birthday (xL i)) (lsub.{u, u} fun i => birthday (xR i))
#align pgame.birthday SetTheory.PGame.birthday
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Birthday.lean | 47 | 51 | theorem birthday_def (x : PGame) :
birthday x =
max (lsub.{u, u} fun i => birthday (x.moveLeft i))
(lsub.{u, u} fun i => birthday (x.moveRight i)) := by |
cases x; rw [birthday]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.fintype.perm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
open Function
open Nat
universe u v
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open Finset Function List Equiv Equiv.Perm
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
def permsOfList : List α → List (Perm α)
| [] => [1]
| a :: l => permsOfList l ++ l.bind fun b => (permsOfList l).map fun f => Equiv.swap a b * f
#align perms_of_list permsOfList
theorem length_permsOfList : ∀ l : List α, length (permsOfList l) = l.length !
| [] => rfl
| a :: l => by
rw [length_cons, Nat.factorial_succ]
simp only [permsOfList, length_append, length_permsOfList, length_bind, comp,
length_map, map_const', sum_replicate, smul_eq_mul, succ_mul]
ring
#align length_perms_of_list length_permsOfList
theorem mem_permsOfList_of_mem {l : List α} {f : Perm α} (h : ∀ x, f x ≠ x → x ∈ l) :
f ∈ permsOfList l := by
induction l generalizing f with
| nil =>
-- Porting note: applied `not_mem_nil` because it is no longer true definitionally.
simp only [not_mem_nil] at h
exact List.mem_singleton.2 (Equiv.ext fun x => Decidable.by_contradiction <| h x)
| cons a l IH =>
by_cases hfa : f a = a
· refine mem_append_left _ (IH fun x hx => mem_of_ne_of_mem ?_ (h x hx))
rintro rfl
exact hx hfa
have hfa' : f (f a) ≠ f a := mt (fun h => f.injective h) hfa
have : ∀ x : α, (Equiv.swap a (f a) * f) x ≠ x → x ∈ l := by
intro x hx
have hxa : x ≠ a := by
rintro rfl
apply hx
simp only [mul_apply, swap_apply_right]
refine List.mem_of_ne_of_mem hxa (h x fun h => ?_)
simp only [mul_apply, swap_apply_def, mul_apply, Ne, apply_eq_iff_eq] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h_1
exacts [hxa (h.symm.trans h_1), hx h]
suffices f ∈ permsOfList l ∨ ∃ b ∈ l, ∃ g ∈ permsOfList l, Equiv.swap a b * g = f by
simpa only [permsOfList, exists_prop, List.mem_map, mem_append, List.mem_bind]
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun _hfl => ⟨f a, ?_, Equiv.swap a (f a) * f, IH this, ?_⟩
· exact mem_of_ne_of_mem hfa (h _ hfa')
· rw [← mul_assoc, mul_def (swap a (f a)) (swap a (f a)), swap_swap, ← Perm.one_def, one_mul]
#align mem_perms_of_list_of_mem mem_permsOfList_of_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Fintype/Perm.lean | 77 | 94 | theorem mem_of_mem_permsOfList :
-- Porting note: was `∀ {x}` but need to capture the `x`
∀ {l : List α} {f : Perm α}, f ∈ permsOfList l → (x :α ) → f x ≠ x → x ∈ l
| [], f, h, heq_iff_eq => by
have : f = 1 := by | simpa [permsOfList] using h
rw [this]; simp
| a :: l, f, h, x =>
(mem_append.1 h).elim (fun h hx => mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_of_mem_permsOfList h x hx))
fun h hx =>
let ⟨y, hy, hy'⟩ := List.mem_bind.1 h
let ⟨g, hg₁, hg₂⟩ := List.mem_map.1 hy'
-- Porting note: Seems like the implicit variable `x` of type `α` is needed.
if hxa : x = a then by simp [hxa]
else
if hxy : x = y then mem_cons_of_mem _ <| by rwa [hxy]
else mem_cons_of_mem a <| mem_of_mem_permsOfList hg₁ _ <| by
rw [eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq.2 hg₂, mul_apply, swap_inv, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs <;> [exact Ne.symm hxy; exact Ne.symm hxa; exact hx]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Abs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.NeZero
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
#align_import data.nat.cast.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"acebd8d49928f6ed8920e502a6c90674e75bd441"
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [AddMonoidWithOne α] [PartialOrder α]
variable [CovariantClass α α (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] [ZeroLEOneClass α]
@[mono]
theorem mono_cast : Monotone (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n ↦ by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]; exact le_add_of_nonneg_right zero_le_one
#align nat.mono_cast Nat.mono_cast
@[deprecated mono_cast (since := "2024-02-10")]
theorem cast_le_cast {a b : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : (a : α) ≤ b := mono_cast h
@[gcongr]
theorem _root_.GCongr.natCast_le_natCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a ≤ b) : (a : α) ≤ b := mono_cast h
@[simp low]
theorem cast_nonneg' (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : α) :=
@Nat.cast_zero α _ ▸ mono_cast (Nat.zero_le n)
@[simp]
theorem cast_nonneg {α} [OrderedSemiring α] (n : ℕ) : 0 ≤ (n : α) :=
cast_nonneg' n
#align nat.cast_nonneg Nat.cast_nonneg
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp low]
theorem ofNat_nonneg' (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : 0 ≤ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)) := cast_nonneg' n
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_nonneg {α} [OrderedSemiring α] (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
0 ≤ (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)) :=
ofNat_nonneg' n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_min {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {a b : ℕ} : ((min a b : ℕ) : α) = min (a : α) b :=
(@mono_cast α _).map_min
#align nat.cast_min Nat.cast_min
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_max {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {a b : ℕ} : ((max a b : ℕ) : α) = max (a : α) b :=
(@mono_cast α _).map_max
#align nat.cast_max Nat.cast_max
section Nontrivial
variable [NeZero (1 : α)]
theorem cast_add_one_pos (n : ℕ) : 0 < (n : α) + 1 := by
apply zero_lt_one.trans_le
convert (@mono_cast α _).imp (?_ : 1 ≤ n + 1)
<;> simp
#align nat.cast_add_one_pos Nat.cast_add_one_pos
@[simp low]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Order.lean | 88 | 88 | theorem cast_pos' {n : ℕ} : (0 : α) < n ↔ 0 < n := by | cases n <;> simp [cast_add_one_pos]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
#align_import topology.uniform_space.uniform_convergence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2705404e701abc6b3127da906f40bae062a169c9"
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
{g : ι → α}
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformlyOn
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
#align tendsto_uniformly_on.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_filter.tendsto_uniformly_on TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {p : Filter ι} {s : Set α} :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
#align tendsto_uniformly TendstoUniformly
-- Porting note: moved from below
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_univ tendstoUniformlyOn_univ
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
#align tendsto_uniformly_iff_tendsto_uniformly_on_filter tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
#align tendsto_uniformly.tendsto_uniformly_on_filter TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
#align tendsto_uniformly_on_iff_tendsto_uniformly_comp_coe tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 160 | 162 | theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {p : Filter ι} :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by |
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 66 | 71 | theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by |
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.ExteriorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.contraction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R : Type u1} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type u2} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section contractLeft
variable (d d' : Module.Dual R M)
@[simps!]
def contractLeftAux (d : Module.Dual R M) :
M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q × CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
haveI v_mul := (Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q
d.smulRight (LinearMap.fst _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) (CliffordAlgebra Q)) -
v_mul.compl₂ (LinearMap.snd _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) _)
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_aux CliffordAlgebra.contractLeftAux
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 68 | 72 | theorem contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux (v : M) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (fx : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractLeftAux Q d v (ι Q v * x, contractLeftAux Q d v (x, fx)) = Q v • fx := by |
simp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← sub_add, mul_smul_comm, sub_self,
zero_add]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
#align_import analysis.normed_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
open Set Metric Pointwise
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
noncomputable section
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall : PartialHomeomorph E E where
toFun x := (√(1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2))⁻¹ • x
invFun y := (√(1 - ‖(y : E)‖ ^ 2))⁻¹ • (y : E)
source := univ
target := ball 0 1
map_source' x _ := by
have : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by positivity
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_inv, ← _root_.div_eq_inv_mul,
div_lt_one (abs_pos.mpr <| Real.sqrt_ne_zero'.mpr this), ← abs_norm x, ← sq_lt_sq,
abs_norm, Real.sq_sqrt this.le]
exact lt_one_add _
map_target' _ _ := trivial
left_inv' x _ := by
field_simp [norm_smul, smul_smul, (zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq x).ne', sq_abs,
Real.sq_sqrt (zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq x).le, ← Real.sqrt_div (zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq x).le]
right_inv' y hy := by
have : 0 < 1 - ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by nlinarith [norm_nonneg y, mem_ball_zero_iff.1 hy]
field_simp [norm_smul, smul_smul, this.ne', sq_abs, Real.sq_sqrt this.le,
← Real.sqrt_div this.le]
open_source := isOpen_univ
open_target := isOpen_ball
continuousOn_toFun := by
suffices Continuous fun (x:E) => (√(1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2))⁻¹
from (this.smul continuous_id).continuousOn
refine Continuous.inv₀ ?_ fun x => Real.sqrt_ne_zero'.mpr (by positivity)
continuity
continuousOn_invFun := by
have : ∀ y ∈ ball (0 : E) 1, √(1 - ‖(y : E)‖ ^ 2) ≠ 0 := fun y hy ↦ by
rw [Real.sqrt_ne_zero']
nlinarith [norm_nonneg y, mem_ball_zero_iff.1 hy]
exact ContinuousOn.smul (ContinuousOn.inv₀
(continuousOn_const.sub (continuous_norm.continuousOn.pow _)).sqrt this) continuousOn_id
@[simp]
theorem PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall_apply_zero : univUnitBall (0 : E) = 0 := by
simp [PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall_apply]
@[simp]
theorem PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall_symm_apply_zero : univUnitBall.symm (0 : E) = 0 := by
simp [PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall_symm_apply]
@[simps! (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def Homeomorph.unitBall : E ≃ₜ ball (0 : E) 1 :=
(Homeomorph.Set.univ _).symm.trans PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall.toHomeomorphSourceTarget
#align homeomorph_unit_ball Homeomorph.unitBall
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.coe_unitBall_apply_zero :
(Homeomorph.unitBall (0 : E) : E) = 0 :=
PartialHomeomorph.univUnitBall_apply_zero
#align coe_homeomorph_unit_ball_apply_zero Homeomorph.coe_unitBall_apply_zero
variable {P : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor E P]
namespace PartialHomeomorph
@[simps!]
def unitBallBall (c : P) (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) : PartialHomeomorph E P :=
((Homeomorph.smulOfNeZero r hr.ne').trans
(IsometryEquiv.vaddConst c).toHomeomorph).toPartialHomeomorphOfImageEq
(ball 0 1) isOpen_ball (ball c r) <| by
change (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst c) ∘ (r • ·) '' ball (0 : E) 1 = ball c r
rw [image_comp, image_smul, smul_unitBall hr.ne', IsometryEquiv.image_ball]
simp [abs_of_pos hr]
def univBall (c : P) (r : ℝ) : PartialHomeomorph E P :=
if h : 0 < r then univUnitBall.trans' (unitBallBall c r h) rfl
else (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst c).toHomeomorph.toPartialHomeomorph
@[simp]
theorem univBall_source (c : P) (r : ℝ) : (univBall c r).source = univ := by
unfold univBall; split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem univBall_target (c : P) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (univBall c r).target = ball c r := by
rw [univBall, dif_pos hr]; rfl
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/HomeomorphBall.lean | 133 | 137 | theorem ball_subset_univBall_target (c : P) (r : ℝ) : ball c r ⊆ (univBall c r).target := by |
by_cases hr : 0 < r
· rw [univBall_target c hr]
· rw [univBall, dif_neg hr]
exact subset_univ _
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Divisors
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Digits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.MaxPowDiv
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_val from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60fa54e778c9e85d930efae172435f42fb0d71f7"
universe u
open Nat
open Rat
open multiplicity
def padicValNat (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if h : p ≠ 1 ∧ 0 < n then (multiplicity p n).get (multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.2 h) else 0
#align padic_val_nat padicValNat
namespace padicValNat
open multiplicity
variable {p : ℕ}
@[simp]
protected theorem zero : padicValNat p 0 = 0 := by simp [padicValNat]
#align padic_val_nat.zero padicValNat.zero
@[simp]
protected theorem one : padicValNat p 1 = 0 := by
unfold padicValNat
split_ifs
· simp
· rfl
#align padic_val_nat.one padicValNat.one
@[simp]
theorem self (hp : 1 < p) : padicValNat p p = 1 := by
have neq_one : ¬p = 1 ↔ True := iff_of_true hp.ne' trivial
have eq_zero_false : p = 0 ↔ False := iff_false_intro (zero_lt_one.trans hp).ne'
simp [padicValNat, neq_one, eq_zero_false]
#align padic_val_nat.self padicValNat.self
@[simp]
theorem eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : padicValNat p n = 0 ↔ p = 1 ∨ n = 0 ∨ ¬p ∣ n := by
simp only [padicValNat, dite_eq_right_iff, PartENat.get_eq_iff_eq_coe, Nat.cast_zero,
multiplicity_eq_zero, and_imp, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ← or_iff_not_imp_left]
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_iff padicValNat.eq_zero_iff
theorem eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : padicValNat p n = 0 :=
eq_zero_iff.2 <| Or.inr <| Or.inr h
#align padic_val_nat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd padicValNat.eq_zero_of_not_dvd
open Nat.maxPowDiv
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicVal.lean | 119 | 124 | theorem maxPowDiv_eq_multiplicity {p n : ℕ} (hp : 1 < p) (hn : 0 < n) :
p.maxPowDiv n = multiplicity p n := by |
apply multiplicity.unique <| pow_dvd p n
intro h
apply Nat.not_lt.mpr <| le_of_dvd hp hn h
simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.FullSubcategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Whiskering
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentialImage
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Slice
#align_import category_theory.equivalence from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Functor NatIso Category
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
@[ext]
structure Equivalence (C : Type u₁) (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₁} C] [Category.{v₂} D] where mk' ::
functor : C ⥤ D
inverse : D ⥤ C
unitIso : 𝟭 C ≅ functor ⋙ inverse
counitIso : inverse ⋙ functor ≅ 𝟭 D
functor_unitIso_comp :
∀ X : C, functor.map (unitIso.hom.app X) ≫ counitIso.hom.app (functor.obj X) =
𝟙 (functor.obj X) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.equivalence CategoryTheory.Equivalence
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_iso CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitIso
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_iso_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unitIso_comp
infixr:10 " ≌ " => Equivalence
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
namespace Equivalence
abbrev unit (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 C ⟶ e.functor ⋙ e.inverse :=
e.unitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unit
abbrev counit (e : C ≌ D) : e.inverse ⋙ e.functor ⟶ 𝟭 D :=
e.counitIso.hom
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit
abbrev unitInv (e : C ≌ D) : e.functor ⋙ e.inverse ⟶ 𝟭 C :=
e.unitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.unitInv
abbrev counitInv (e : C ≌ D) : 𝟭 D ⟶ e.inverse ⋙ e.functor :=
e.counitIso.inv
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unit = unit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counit (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counit = counit_iso.hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counit
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_unitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).unitInv = unit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_unit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_unitInv
@[simp]
theorem Equivalence_mk'_counitInv (functor inverse unit_iso counit_iso f) :
(⟨functor, inverse, unit_iso, counit_iso, f⟩ : C ≌ D).counitInv = counit_iso.inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.equivalence_mk'_counit_inv CategoryTheory.Equivalence.Equivalence_mk'_counitInv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem functor_unit_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) ≫ e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) :=
e.functor_unitIso_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.functor_unit_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.functor_unit_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem counitInv_functor_comp (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) ≫ e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) = 𝟙 (e.functor.obj X) := by
erw [Iso.inv_eq_inv (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X) ≪≫ e.counitIso.app (e.functor.obj X))
(Iso.refl _)]
exact e.functor_unit_comp X
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_functor_comp CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_functor_comp
theorem counitInv_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counitInv.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unit.app X) := by
symm
erw [← Iso.comp_hom_eq_id (e.counitIso.app _), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_inv_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counitInv_app_functor
theorem counit_app_functor (e : C ≌ D) (X : C) :
e.counit.app (e.functor.obj X) = e.functor.map (e.unitInv.app X) := by
erw [← Iso.hom_comp_eq_id (e.functor.mapIso (e.unitIso.app X)), functor_unit_comp]
rfl
#align category_theory.equivalence.counit_app_functor CategoryTheory.Equivalence.counit_app_functor
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Equivalence.lean | 182 | 203 | theorem unit_inverse_comp (e : C ≌ D) (Y : D) :
e.unit.app (e.inverse.obj Y) ≫ e.inverse.map (e.counit.app Y) = 𝟙 (e.inverse.obj Y) := by |
rw [← id_comp (e.inverse.map _), ← map_id e.inverse, ← counitInv_functor_comp, map_comp]
dsimp
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.unitIso.app _) (e.inverse.map (e.functor.map _)), app_hom, app_inv]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 1 2 => erw [e.unit.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 4 =>
rw [← Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc (e.inverse.mapIso (e.counitIso.app _)) (e.unitInv.app _)]
slice_lhs 3 4 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counit.naturality]
erw [(e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 2 3 => erw [← map_comp e.inverse, e.counitIso.inv.naturality, map_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 4 5 => erw [← map_comp (e.functor ⋙ e.inverse), (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id, map_id]
erw [id_comp]
slice_lhs 3 4 => erw [← e.unitInv.naturality]
slice_lhs 2 3 =>
erw [← map_comp e.inverse, ← e.counitIso.inv.naturality, (e.counitIso.app _).hom_inv_id,
map_id]
erw [id_comp, (e.unitIso.app _).hom_inv_id]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section OrderedAddCommGroup
variable [OrderedAddCommGroup α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ici : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ici Set.preimage_const_add_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioi : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioi Set.preimage_const_add_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iic Set.preimage_const_add_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.symm
#align set.preimage_const_add_Iio Set.preimage_const_add_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Icc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Icc Set.preimage_const_add_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ico : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ico Set.preimage_const_add_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioc : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioc Set.preimage_const_add_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_add_Ioo : (fun x => a + x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_const_add_Ioo Set.preimage_const_add_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ici : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_iff_le_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ici Set.preimage_add_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioi : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_iff_lt_add.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioi Set.preimage_add_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_iff_add_le.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iic Set.preimage_add_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b - a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_iff_add_lt.symm
#align set.preimage_add_const_Iio Set.preimage_add_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Icc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Icc Set.preimage_add_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ico : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ico Set.preimage_add_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioc : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioc Set.preimage_add_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_add_const_Ioo : (fun x => x + a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b - a) (c - a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align set.preimage_add_const_Ioo Set.preimage_add_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ici : -Ici a = Iic (-a) :=
ext fun _x => le_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ici Set.preimage_neg_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iic : -Iic a = Ici (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_le
#align set.preimage_neg_Iic Set.preimage_neg_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioi : -Ioi a = Iio (-a) :=
ext fun _x => lt_neg
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioi Set.preimage_neg_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Iio : -Iio a = Ioi (-a) :=
ext fun _x => neg_lt
#align set.preimage_neg_Iio Set.preimage_neg_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Icc : -Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Icc Set.preimage_neg_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ico : -Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ico Set.preimage_neg_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioc : -Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioc Set.preimage_neg_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_neg_Ioo : -Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_neg_Ioo Set.preimage_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ici Set.preimage_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iic Set.preimage_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Iio Set.preimage_sub_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Icc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Icc Set.preimage_sub_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ico : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ico (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ico Set.preimage_sub_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioc : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ioc (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sub_const_Ioo : (fun x => x - a) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (b + a) (c + a) := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg]
#align set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo Set.preimage_sub_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ici b = Iic (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => le_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ici Set.preimage_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iic b = Ici (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_le_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iic Set.preimage_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => lt_sub_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) :=
ext fun _x => sub_lt_comm
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Iio Set.preimage_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Icc Set.preimage_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ico Set.preimage_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) ⁻¹' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo Set.preimage_const_sub_Ioo
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iic : (fun x => a + x) '' Iic b = Iic (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iic Set.image_const_add_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this modulo `add_comm`
theorem image_const_add_Iio : (fun x => a + x) '' Iio b = Iio (a + b) := by simp [add_comm]
#align set.image_const_add_Iio Set.image_const_add_Iio
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iic : (fun x => x + a) '' Iic b = Iic (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iic Set.image_add_const_Iic
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem image_add_const_Iio : (fun x => x + a) '' Iio b = Iio (b + a) := by simp
#align set.image_add_const_Iio Set.image_add_const_Iio
theorem image_neg_Ici : Neg.neg '' Ici a = Iic (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ici Set.image_neg_Ici
theorem image_neg_Iic : Neg.neg '' Iic a = Ici (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iic Set.image_neg_Iic
theorem image_neg_Ioi : Neg.neg '' Ioi a = Iio (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioi Set.image_neg_Ioi
theorem image_neg_Iio : Neg.neg '' Iio a = Ioi (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Iio Set.image_neg_Iio
theorem image_neg_Icc : Neg.neg '' Icc a b = Icc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Icc Set.image_neg_Icc
theorem image_neg_Ico : Neg.neg '' Ico a b = Ioc (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ico Set.image_neg_Ico
theorem image_neg_Ioc : Neg.neg '' Ioc a b = Ico (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioc Set.image_neg_Ioc
theorem image_neg_Ioo : Neg.neg '' Ioo a b = Ioo (-b) (-a) := by simp
#align set.image_neg_Ioo Set.image_neg_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ici : (fun x => a - x) '' Ici b = Iic (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ici Set.image_const_sub_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iic : (fun x => a - x) '' Iic b = Ici (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iic Set.image_const_sub_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioi : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioi b = Iio (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioi Set.image_const_sub_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Iio : (fun x => a - x) '' Iio b = Ioi (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Iio Set.image_const_sub_Iio
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Icc : (fun x => a - x) '' Icc b c = Icc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Icc Set.image_const_sub_Icc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ico : (fun x => a - x) '' Ico b c = Ioc (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ico Set.image_const_sub_Ico
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioc : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioc b c = Ico (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioc Set.image_const_sub_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem image_const_sub_Ioo : (fun x => a - x) '' Ioo b c = Ioo (a - c) (a - b) := by
have := image_comp (fun x => a + x) fun x => -x; dsimp [Function.comp_def] at this
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, this, add_comm]
#align set.image_const_sub_Ioo Set.image_const_sub_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ici : (fun x => x - a) '' Ici b = Ici (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ici Set.image_sub_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Iic : (fun x => x - a) '' Iic b = Iic (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Iic Set.image_sub_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem image_sub_const_Ioi : (fun x => x - a) '' Ioi b = Ioi (b - a) := by simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
#align set.image_sub_const_Ioi Set.image_sub_const_Ioi
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 470 | 470 | theorem image_sub_const_Iio : (fun x => x - a) '' Iio b = Iio (b - a) := by | simp [sub_eq_neg_add]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Commutator
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
#align_import group_theory.abelianization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4be589053caf347b899a494da75410deb55fb3ef"
universe u v w
-- Let G be a group.
variable (G : Type u) [Group G]
open Subgroup (centralizer)
def commutator : Subgroup G := ⁅(⊤ : Subgroup G), ⊤⁆
#align commutator commutator
-- Porting note: this instance should come from `deriving Subgroup.Normal`
instance : Subgroup.Normal (commutator G) := Subgroup.commutator_normal ⊤ ⊤
theorem commutator_def : commutator G = ⁅(⊤ : Subgroup G), ⊤⁆ :=
rfl
#align commutator_def commutator_def
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Abelianization.lean | 49 | 50 | theorem commutator_eq_closure : commutator G = Subgroup.closure (commutatorSet G) := by |
simp [commutator, Subgroup.commutator_def, commutatorSet]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.intervals.ord_connected_component from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
open Interval Function OrderDual
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α} {x y z : α}
def ordConnectedComponent (s : Set α) (x : α) : Set α :=
{ y | [[x, y]] ⊆ s }
#align set.ord_connected_component Set.ordConnectedComponent
theorem mem_ordConnectedComponent : y ∈ ordConnectedComponent s x ↔ [[x, y]] ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_ord_connected_component Set.mem_ordConnectedComponent
theorem dual_ordConnectedComponent :
ordConnectedComponent (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual x) = ofDual ⁻¹' ordConnectedComponent s x :=
ext <| (Surjective.forall toDual.surjective).2 fun x => by
rw [mem_ordConnectedComponent, dual_uIcc]
rfl
#align set.dual_ord_connected_component Set.dual_ordConnectedComponent
theorem ordConnectedComponent_subset : ordConnectedComponent s x ⊆ s := fun _ hy =>
hy right_mem_uIcc
#align set.ord_connected_component_subset Set.ordConnectedComponent_subset
theorem subset_ordConnectedComponent {t} [h : OrdConnected s] (hs : x ∈ s) (ht : s ⊆ t) :
s ⊆ ordConnectedComponent t x := fun _ hy => (h.uIcc_subset hs hy).trans ht
#align set.subset_ord_connected_component Set.subset_ordConnectedComponent
@[simp]
theorem self_mem_ordConnectedComponent : x ∈ ordConnectedComponent s x ↔ x ∈ s := by
rw [mem_ordConnectedComponent, uIcc_self, singleton_subset_iff]
#align set.self_mem_ord_connected_component Set.self_mem_ordConnectedComponent
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_ordConnectedComponent : (ordConnectedComponent s x).Nonempty ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy <| left_mem_uIcc, fun h => ⟨x, self_mem_ordConnectedComponent.2 h⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_ord_connected_component Set.nonempty_ordConnectedComponent
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/OrdConnectedComponent.lean | 63 | 64 | theorem ordConnectedComponent_eq_empty : ordConnectedComponent s x = ∅ ↔ x ∉ s := by |
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, nonempty_ordConnectedComponent]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.PiSystem
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
open Set
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {ι : Type _} {α : ι → Type _}
section squareCylinders
def squareCylinders (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) : Set (Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
{S | ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ t ∈ univ.pi C, S = (s : Set ι).pi t}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Cylinders.lean | 57 | 61 | theorem squareCylinders_eq_iUnion_image (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) :
squareCylinders C = ⋃ s : Finset ι, (fun t ↦ (s : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi C := by |
ext1 f
simp only [squareCylinders, mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_univ_pi, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq,
eq_comm (a := f)]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
#align_import data.set.list from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2ec920d35348cb2d13ac0e1a2ad9df0fdf1a76b4"
open List
variable {α β : Type*} (l : List α)
namespace Set
theorem range_list_map (f : α → β) : range (map f) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ range f } := by
refine antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 fun l => forall_mem_map_iff.2 fun y _ => mem_range_self _)
fun l hl => ?_
induction' l with a l ihl; · exact ⟨[], rfl⟩
rcases ihl fun x hx => hl x <| subset_cons _ _ hx with ⟨l, rfl⟩
rcases hl a (mem_cons_self _ _) with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: l, map_cons _ _ _⟩
#align set.range_list_map Set.range_list_map
| Mathlib/Data/Set/List.lean | 33 | 34 | theorem range_list_map_coe (s : Set α) : range (map ((↑) : s → α)) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ s } := by |
rw [range_list_map, Subtype.range_coe]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.join from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"18a5306c091183ac90884daa9373fa3b178e8607"
-- Make sure we don't import algebra
assert_not_exists Monoid
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
attribute [simp] join
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem join_singleton (l : List α) : [l].join = l := by rw [join, join, append_nil]
#align list.join_singleton List.join_singleton
@[simp]
theorem join_eq_nil : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, join L = [] ↔ ∀ l ∈ L, l = []
| [] => iff_of_true rfl (forall_mem_nil _)
| l :: L => by simp only [join, append_eq_nil, join_eq_nil, forall_mem_cons]
#align list.join_eq_nil List.join_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem join_append (L₁ L₂ : List (List α)) : join (L₁ ++ L₂) = join L₁ ++ join L₂ := by
induction L₁
· rfl
· simp [*]
#align list.join_append List.join_append
theorem join_concat (L : List (List α)) (l : List α) : join (L.concat l) = join L ++ l := by simp
#align list.join_concat List.join_concat
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_not_isEmpty :
∀ {L : List (List α)}, join (L.filter fun l => !l.isEmpty) = L.join
| [] => rfl
| [] :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L), isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
| (a :: l) :: L => by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty (L := L)]
#align list.join_filter_empty_eq_ff List.join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-25")] alias join_filter_isEmpty_eq_false := join_filter_not_isEmpty
@[simp]
theorem join_filter_ne_nil [DecidablePred fun l : List α => l ≠ []] {L : List (List α)} :
join (L.filter fun l => l ≠ []) = L.join := by
simp [join_filter_not_isEmpty, ← isEmpty_iff_eq_nil]
#align list.join_filter_ne_nil List.join_filter_ne_nil
| Mathlib/Data/List/Join.lean | 65 | 66 | theorem join_join (l : List (List (List α))) : l.join.join = (l.map join).join := by |
induction l <;> simp [*]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Hull
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basis
#align_import analysis.convex.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92bd7b1ffeb306a89f450bee126ddd8a284c259d"
open Set Function
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise
universe u u'
variable {R R' E F ι ι' α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField R] [LinearOrderedField R'] [AddCommGroup E]
[AddCommGroup F] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup α] [Module R E] [Module R F] [Module R α]
[OrderedSMul R α] {s : Set E}
def Finset.centerMass (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E) : E :=
(∑ i ∈ t, w i)⁻¹ • ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i
#align finset.center_mass Finset.centerMass
variable (i j : ι) (c : R) (t : Finset ι) (w : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
open Finset
theorem Finset.centerMass_empty : (∅ : Finset ι).centerMass w z = 0 := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_empty, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_empty Finset.centerMass_empty
theorem Finset.centerMass_pair (hne : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = (w i / (w i + w j)) • z i + (w j / (w i + w j)) • z j := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_pair hne, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align finset.center_mass_pair Finset.centerMass_pair
variable {w}
theorem Finset.centerMass_insert (ha : i ∉ t) (hw : ∑ j ∈ t, w j ≠ 0) :
(insert i t).centerMass w z =
(w i / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • z i +
((∑ j ∈ t, w j) / (w i + ∑ j ∈ t, w j)) • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert ha, smul_add, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, ← div_eq_inv_mul]
congr 2
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_inv_cancel hw, one_div]
#align finset.center_mass_insert Finset.centerMass_insert
theorem Finset.centerMass_singleton (hw : w i ≠ 0) : ({i} : Finset ι).centerMass w z = z i := by
rw [centerMass, sum_singleton, sum_singleton, ← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel hw, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_singleton Finset.centerMass_singleton
@[simp] lemma Finset.centerMass_neg_left : t.centerMass (-w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, inv_neg]
lemma Finset.centerMass_smul_left {c : R'} [Module R' R] [Module R' E] [SMulCommClass R' R R]
[IsScalarTower R' R R] [SMulCommClass R R' E] [IsScalarTower R' R E] (hc : c ≠ 0) :
t.centerMass (c • w) z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, -smul_assoc, smul_assoc c, ← smul_sum, smul_inv₀, smul_smul_smul_comm, hc]
theorem Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 (hw : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) :
t.centerMass w z = ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, hw, inv_one, one_smul]
#align finset.center_mass_eq_of_sum_1 Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1
theorem Finset.centerMass_smul : (t.centerMass w fun i => c • z i) = c • t.centerMass w z := by
simp only [Finset.centerMass, Finset.smul_sum, (mul_smul _ _ _).symm, mul_comm c, mul_assoc]
#align finset.center_mass_smul Finset.centerMass_smul
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset ι') (ws : ι → R) (zs : ι → E)
(wt : ι' → R) (zt : ι' → E) (hws : ∑ i ∈ s, ws i = 1) (hwt : ∑ i ∈ t, wt i = 1) (a b : R)
(hab : a + b = 1) : a • s.centerMass ws zs + b • t.centerMass wt zt = (s.disjSum t).centerMass
(Sum.elim (fun i => a * ws i) fun j => b * wt j) (Sum.elim zs zt) := by
rw [s.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hws, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hwt, smul_sum, smul_sum, ←
Finset.sum_sum_elim, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· congr with ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [Sum.elim_inl, Sum.elim_inr, mul_smul]
· rw [sum_sum_elim, ← mul_sum, ← mul_sum, hws, hwt, mul_one, mul_one, hab]
#align finset.center_mass_segment' Finset.centerMass_segment'
theorem Finset.centerMass_segment (s : Finset ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → R) (z : ι → E)
(hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1) (a b : R) (hab : a + b = 1) :
a • s.centerMass w₁ z + b • s.centerMass w₂ z =
s.centerMass (fun i => a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i) z := by
have hw : (∑ i ∈ s, (a * w₁ i + b * w₂ i)) = 1 := by
simp only [← mul_sum, sum_add_distrib, mul_one, *]
simp only [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1, Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ _ hw,
smul_sum, sum_add_distrib, add_smul, mul_smul, *]
#align finset.center_mass_segment Finset.centerMass_segment
theorem Finset.centerMass_ite_eq (hi : i ∈ t) :
t.centerMass (fun j => if i = j then (1 : R) else 0) z = z i := by
rw [Finset.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1]
· trans ∑ j ∈ t, if i = j then z i else 0
· congr with i
split_ifs with h
exacts [h ▸ one_smul _ _, zero_smul _ _]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
· rw [sum_ite_eq, if_pos hi]
#align finset.center_mass_ite_eq Finset.centerMass_ite_eq
variable {t}
theorem Finset.centerMass_subset {t' : Finset ι} (ht : t ⊆ t') (h : ∀ i ∈ t', i ∉ t → w i = 0) :
t.centerMass w z = t'.centerMass w z := by
rw [centerMass, sum_subset ht h, smul_sum, centerMass, smul_sum]
apply sum_subset ht
intro i hit' hit
rw [h i hit' hit, zero_smul, smul_zero]
#align finset.center_mass_subset Finset.centerMass_subset
theorem Finset.centerMass_filter_ne_zero :
(t.filter fun i => w i ≠ 0).centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z :=
Finset.centerMass_subset z (filter_subset _ _) fun i hit hit' => by
simpa only [hit, mem_filter, true_and_iff, Ne, Classical.not_not] using hit'
#align finset.center_mass_filter_ne_zero Finset.centerMass_filter_ne_zero
variable {z}
lemma Finset.centerMass_of_sum_add_sum_eq_zero {s t : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 0) (hz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i • z i + ∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i = 0) :
s.centerMass w z = t.centerMass w z := by
simp [centerMass, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_right hw, eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left hz, ← neg_inv]
theorem Convex.centerMass_mem (hs : Convex R s) :
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → (0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) → (∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) → t.centerMass w z ∈ s := by
induction' t using Finset.induction with i t hi ht
· simp [lt_irrefl]
intro h₀ hpos hmem
have zi : z i ∈ s := hmem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
have hs₀ : ∀ j ∈ t, 0 ≤ w j := fun j hj => h₀ j <| mem_insert_of_mem hj
rw [sum_insert hi] at hpos
by_cases hsum_t : ∑ j ∈ t, w j = 0
· have ws : ∀ j ∈ t, w j = 0 := (sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg hs₀).1 hsum_t
have wz : ∑ j ∈ t, w j • z j = 0 := sum_eq_zero fun i hi => by simp [ws i hi]
simp only [centerMass, sum_insert hi, wz, hsum_t, add_zero]
simp only [hsum_t, add_zero] at hpos
rw [← mul_smul, inv_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hpos), one_smul]
exact zi
· rw [Finset.centerMass_insert _ _ _ hi hsum_t]
refine convex_iff_div.1 hs zi (ht hs₀ ?_ ?_) ?_ (sum_nonneg hs₀) hpos
· exact lt_of_le_of_ne (sum_nonneg hs₀) (Ne.symm hsum_t)
· intro j hj
exact hmem j (mem_insert_of_mem hj)
· exact h₀ _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
#align convex.center_mass_mem Convex.centerMass_mem
theorem Convex.sum_mem (hs : Convex R s) (h₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1)
(hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) : (∑ i ∈ t, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
simpa only [h₁, centerMass, inv_one, one_smul] using
hs.centerMass_mem h₀ (h₁.symm ▸ zero_lt_one) hz
#align convex.sum_mem Convex.sum_mem
theorem Convex.finsum_mem {ι : Sort*} {w : ι → R} {z : ι → E} {s : Set E} (hs : Convex R s)
(h₀ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ w i) (h₁ : ∑ᶠ i, w i = 1) (hz : ∀ i, w i ≠ 0 → z i ∈ s) :
(∑ᶠ i, w i • z i) ∈ s := by
have hfin_w : (support (w ∘ PLift.down)).Finite := by
by_contra H
rw [finsum, dif_neg H] at h₁
exact zero_ne_one h₁
have hsub : support ((fun i => w i • z i) ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ hfin_w.toFinset :=
(support_smul_subset_left _ _).trans hfin_w.coe_toFinset.ge
rw [finsum_eq_sum_plift_of_support_subset hsub]
refine hs.sum_mem (fun _ _ => h₀ _) ?_ fun i hi => hz _ ?_
· rwa [finsum, dif_pos hfin_w] at h₁
· rwa [hfin_w.mem_toFinset] at hi
#align convex.finsum_mem Convex.finsum_mem
theorem convex_iff_sum_mem : Convex R s ↔ ∀ (t : Finset E) (w : E → R),
(∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i) → ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1 → (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) → (∑ x ∈ t, w x • x) ∈ s := by
refine ⟨fun hs t w hw₀ hw₁ hts => hs.sum_mem hw₀ hw₁ hts, ?_⟩
intro h x hx y hy a b ha hb hab
by_cases h_cases : x = y
· rw [h_cases, ← add_smul, hab, one_smul]
exact hy
· convert h {x, y} (fun z => if z = y then b else a) _ _ _
-- Porting note: Original proof had 2 `simp_intro i hi`
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial]
· intro i _
simp only
split_ifs <;> assumption
· simp only [sum_pair h_cases, if_neg h_cases, if_pos trivial, hab]
· intro i hi
simp only [Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.mem_insert] at hi
cases hi <;> subst i <;> assumption
#align convex_iff_sum_mem convex_iff_sum_mem
theorem Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull (t : Finset ι) {w : ι → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) {z : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) :
t.centerMass w z ∈ convexHull R s :=
(convex_convexHull R s).centerMass_mem hw₀ hws fun i hi => subset_convexHull R s <| hz i hi
#align finset.center_mass_mem_convex_hull Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull
lemma Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos (t : Finset ι) (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, w i ≤ 0)
(hws : ∑ i ∈ t, w i < 0) (hz : ∀ i ∈ t, z i ∈ s) : t.centerMass w z ∈ convexHull R s := by
rw [← centerMass_neg_left]
exact Finset.centerMass_mem_convexHull _ (fun _i hi ↦ neg_nonneg.2 <| hw₀ _ hi) (by simpa) hz
theorem Finset.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull (t : Finset E) {w : E → R} (hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, 0 ≤ w i)
(hws : 0 < ∑ i ∈ t, w i) : t.centerMass w id ∈ convexHull R (t : Set E) :=
t.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀ hws fun _ => mem_coe.2
#align finset.center_mass_id_mem_convex_hull Finset.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull
lemma Finset.centerMass_id_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos (t : Finset E) {w : E → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ t, w i ≤ 0) (hws : ∑ i ∈ t, w i < 0) :
t.centerMass w id ∈ convexHull R (t : Set E) :=
t.centerMass_mem_convexHull_of_nonpos hw₀ hws fun _ ↦ mem_coe.2
theorem affineCombination_eq_centerMass {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {p : ι → E} {w : ι → R}
(hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ t, w i = 1) : t.affineCombination R p w = centerMass t w p := by
rw [affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ w _ hw₂ (0 : E),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, vadd_eq_add, add_zero, t.centerMass_eq_of_sum_1 _ hw₂]
simp_rw [vsub_eq_sub, sub_zero]
#align affine_combination_eq_center_mass affineCombination_eq_centerMass
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Combination.lean | 267 | 273 | theorem affineCombination_mem_convexHull {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → E} {w : ι → R}
(hw₀ : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ w i) (hw₁ : s.sum w = 1) :
s.affineCombination R v w ∈ convexHull R (range v) := by |
rw [affineCombination_eq_centerMass hw₁]
apply s.centerMass_mem_convexHull hw₀
· simp [hw₁]
· simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
#align_import algebra.order.field.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84771a9f5f0bd5e5d6218811556508ddf476dcbd"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 630 | 631 | theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by |
simp only [division_def, mul_pos_iff, inv_pos, inv_lt_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Integrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Layercake
#align_import analysis.special_functions.japanese_bracket from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Filter Topology ENNReal
open Asymptotics Filter Set Real MeasureTheory FiniteDimensional
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
theorem sqrt_one_add_norm_sq_le (x : E) : √((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ≤ 1 + ‖x‖ := by
rw [sqrt_le_left (by positivity)]
simp [add_sq]
#align sqrt_one_add_norm_sq_le sqrt_one_add_norm_sq_le
theorem one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt (x : E) :
(1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ≤ √2 * √(1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_mul zero_le_two]
have := sq_nonneg (‖x‖ - 1)
apply le_sqrt_of_sq_le
linarith
#align one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt
theorem rpow_neg_one_add_norm_sq_le {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ^ (-r / 2) ≤ (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) :=
calc
((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2) ^ (-r / 2)
= (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * ((√2 * √((1 : ℝ) + ‖x‖ ^ 2)) ^ r)⁻¹ := by
rw [rpow_div_two_eq_sqrt, rpow_div_two_eq_sqrt, mul_rpow, mul_inv, rpow_neg,
mul_inv_cancel_left₀] <;> positivity
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * ((1 + ‖x‖) ^ r)⁻¹ := by
gcongr
apply one_add_norm_le_sqrt_two_mul_sqrt
_ = (2 : ℝ) ^ (r / 2) * (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) := by rw [rpow_neg]; positivity
#align rpow_neg_one_add_norm_sq_le rpow_neg_one_add_norm_sq_le
theorem le_rpow_one_add_norm_iff_norm_le {r t : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ht : 0 < t) (x : E) :
t ≤ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1 := by
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', neg_inv]
exact (Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (by positivity) ht (neg_lt_zero.mpr hr)).symm
#align le_rpow_one_add_norm_iff_norm_le le_rpow_one_add_norm_iff_norm_le
variable (E)
theorem closedBall_rpow_sub_one_eq_empty_aux {r t : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (ht : 1 < t) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : E) (t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) = ∅ := by
rw [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty, sub_neg]
exact Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg ht (by simp only [hr, Right.neg_neg_iff, inv_pos])
#align closed_ball_rpow_sub_one_eq_empty_aux closedBall_rpow_sub_one_eq_empty_aux
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
variable {E}
theorem finite_integral_rpow_sub_one_pow_aux {r : ℝ} (n : ℕ) (hnr : (n : ℝ) < r) :
(∫⁻ x : ℝ in Ioc 0 1, ENNReal.ofReal ((x ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) ^ n)) < ∞ := by
have hr : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_lt n.cast_nonneg hnr
have h_int : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) 1 →
ENNReal.ofReal ((x ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) ^ n) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (x ^ (-(r⁻¹ * n))) := fun x hx ↦ by
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
rw [← neg_mul, rpow_mul hx.1.le, rpow_natCast]
refine pow_le_pow_left ?_ (by simp only [sub_le_self_iff, zero_le_one]) n
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', add_zero]
refine Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx.1 hx.2 ?_
rw [Right.neg_nonpos_iff, inv_nonneg]
exact hr.le
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (set_lintegral_mono' measurableSet_Ioc h_int) ?_
refine IntegrableOn.set_lintegral_lt_top ?_
rw [← intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le zero_le_one]
apply intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow'
rwa [neg_lt_neg_iff, inv_mul_lt_iff' hr, one_mul]
#align finite_integral_rpow_sub_one_pow_aux finite_integral_rpow_sub_one_pow_aux
variable [MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] {μ : Measure E} [μ.IsAddHaarMeasure]
theorem finite_integral_one_add_norm {r : ℝ} (hnr : (finrank ℝ E : ℝ) < r) :
(∫⁻ x : E, ENNReal.ofReal ((1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r)) ∂μ) < ∞ := by
have hr : 0 < r := lt_of_le_of_lt (finrank ℝ E).cast_nonneg hnr
-- We start by applying the layer cake formula
have h_meas : Measurable fun ω : E => (1 + ‖ω‖) ^ (-r) :=
-- Porting note: was `by measurability`
(measurable_norm.const_add _).pow_const _
have h_pos : ∀ x : E, 0 ≤ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r) := fun x ↦ by positivity
rw [lintegral_eq_lintegral_meas_le μ (eventually_of_forall h_pos) h_meas.aemeasurable]
have h_int : ∀ t, 0 < t → μ {a : E | t ≤ (1 + ‖a‖) ^ (-r)} =
μ (Metric.closedBall (0 : E) (t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1)) := fun t ht ↦ by
congr 1
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_closedBall_zero_iff]
exact le_rpow_one_add_norm_iff_norm_le hr (mem_Ioi.mp ht) x
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (eventually_of_forall h_int)]
set f := fun t : ℝ ↦ μ (Metric.closedBall (0 : E) (t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1))
set mB := μ (Metric.ball (0 : E) 1)
-- the next two inequalities are in fact equalities but we don't need that
calc
∫⁻ t in Ioi 0, f t ≤ ∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 1 ∪ Ioi 1, f t := lintegral_mono_set Ioi_subset_Ioc_union_Ioi
_ ≤ (∫⁻ t in Ioc 0 1, f t) + ∫⁻ t in Ioi 1, f t := lintegral_union_le _ _ _
_ < ∞ := ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· -- We use estimates from auxiliary lemmas to deal with integral from `0` to `1`
have h_int' : ∀ t ∈ Ioc (0 : ℝ) 1,
f t = ENNReal.ofReal ((t ^ (-r⁻¹) - 1) ^ finrank ℝ E) * mB := fun t ht ↦ by
refine μ.addHaar_closedBall (0 : E) ?_
rw [sub_nonneg]
exact Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos ht.1 ht.2 (by simp [hr.le])
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioc (ae_of_all _ h_int'),
lintegral_mul_const' _ _ measure_ball_lt_top.ne]
exact ENNReal.mul_lt_top
(finite_integral_rpow_sub_one_pow_aux (finrank ℝ E) hnr).ne measure_ball_lt_top.ne
· -- The integral from 1 to ∞ is zero:
have h_int'' : ∀ t ∈ Ioi (1 : ℝ), f t = 0 := fun t ht => by
simp only [f, closedBall_rpow_sub_one_eq_empty_aux E hr ht, measure_empty]
-- The integral over the constant zero function is finite:
rw [set_lintegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (ae_of_all volume <| h_int''), lintegral_const 0,
zero_mul]
exact WithTop.zero_lt_top
#align finite_integral_one_add_norm finite_integral_one_add_norm
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/JapaneseBracket.lean | 142 | 150 | theorem integrable_one_add_norm {r : ℝ} (hnr : (finrank ℝ E : ℝ) < r) :
Integrable (fun x ↦ (1 + ‖x‖) ^ (-r)) μ := by |
constructor
· measurability
-- Lower Lebesgue integral
have : (∫⁻ a : E, ‖(1 + ‖a‖) ^ (-r)‖₊ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ a : E, ENNReal.ofReal ((1 + ‖a‖) ^ (-r)) ∂μ :=
lintegral_nnnorm_eq_of_nonneg fun _ => rpow_nonneg (by positivity) _
rw [HasFiniteIntegral, this]
exact finite_integral_one_add_norm hnr
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.PUnitInstances
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import algebra.module.submodule.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
universe v
variable {R S M : Type*}
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
variable [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M]
variable {p q : Submodule R M}
namespace Submodule
instance : Bot (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊥ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := {0}
smul_mem' := by simp }⟩
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (Submodule R M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align submodule.inhabited' Submodule.inhabited'
@[simp]
theorem bot_coe : ((⊥ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = {0} :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_coe Submodule.bot_coe
@[simp]
theorem bot_toAddSubmonoid : (⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align submodule.bot_to_add_submonoid Submodule.bot_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma bot_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊥ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊥ := rfl
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot {x : M} : x ∈ (⊥ : Submodule R M) ↔ x = 0 :=
Set.mem_singleton_iff
#align submodule.mem_bot Submodule.mem_bot
instance uniqueBot : Unique (⊥ : Submodule R M) :=
⟨inferInstance, fun x ↦ Subtype.ext <| (mem_bot R).1 x.mem⟩
#align submodule.unique_bot Submodule.uniqueBot
instance : OrderBot (Submodule R M) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le p x := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [zero_mem]
protected theorem eq_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p = ⊥ ↔ ∀ x ∈ p, x = (0 : M) :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.symm ▸ fun _ hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mp hx,
fun h ↦ eq_bot_iff.mpr fun x hx ↦ (mem_bot R).mpr (h x hx)⟩
#align submodule.eq_bot_iff Submodule.eq_bot_iff
@[ext high]
protected theorem bot_ext (x y : (⊥ : Submodule R M)) : x = y := by
rcases x with ⟨x, xm⟩; rcases y with ⟨y, ym⟩; congr
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl x xm]
rw [(Submodule.eq_bot_iff _).mp rfl y ym]
#align submodule.bot_ext Submodule.bot_ext
protected theorem ne_bot_iff (p : Submodule R M) : p ≠ ⊥ ↔ ∃ x ∈ p, x ≠ (0 : M) := by
simp only [ne_eq, p.eq_bot_iff, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align submodule.ne_bot_iff Submodule.ne_bot_iff
theorem nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt {p : Submodule R M} (bot_lt : ⊥ < p) : ∃ a : p, a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp bot_lt.ne'
⟨⟨b, hb₁⟩, hb₂ ∘ congr_arg Subtype.val⟩
#align submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt Submodule.nonzero_mem_of_bot_lt
theorem exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot {p : Submodule R M} (h : p ≠ ⊥) : ∃ b : M, b ∈ p ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩ := p.ne_bot_iff.mp h
⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
#align submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot Submodule.exists_mem_ne_zero_of_ne_bot
-- FIXME: we default PUnit to PUnit.{1} here without the explicit universe annotation
@[simps]
def botEquivPUnit : (⊥ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] PUnit.{v+1} where
toFun _ := PUnit.unit
invFun _ := 0
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.bot_equiv_punit Submodule.botEquivPUnit
theorem subsingleton_iff_eq_bot : Subsingleton p ↔ p = ⊥ := by
rw [subsingleton_iff, Submodule.eq_bot_iff]
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ by simpa using h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨0, p.zero_mem⟩,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ ↦ by simp [h x hx, h y hy]⟩
theorem eq_bot_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton p] : p = ⊥ :=
subsingleton_iff_eq_bot.mp inferInstance
#align submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_bot : Nontrivial p ↔ p ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, subsingleton_iff_eq_bot]
instance : Top (Submodule R M) :=
⟨{ (⊤ : AddSubmonoid M) with
carrier := Set.univ
smul_mem' := fun _ _ _ ↦ trivial }⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_coe : ((⊤ : Submodule R M) : Set M) = Set.univ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_coe Submodule.top_coe
@[simp]
theorem top_toAddSubmonoid : (⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubmonoid = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.top_to_add_submonoid Submodule.top_toAddSubmonoid
@[simp]
lemma top_toAddSubgroup {R M} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] :
(⊤ : Submodule R M).toAddSubgroup = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_top {x : M} : x ∈ (⊤ : Submodule R M) :=
trivial
#align submodule.mem_top Submodule.mem_top
instance : OrderTop (Submodule R M) where
top := ⊤
le_top _ _ _ := trivial
theorem eq_top_iff' {p : Submodule R M} : p = ⊤ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ p :=
eq_top_iff.trans ⟨fun h _ ↦ h trivial, fun h x _ ↦ h x⟩
#align submodule.eq_top_iff' Submodule.eq_top_iff'
@[simps]
def topEquiv : (⊤ : Submodule R M) ≃ₗ[R] M where
toFun x := x
invFun x := ⟨x, mem_top⟩
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align submodule.top_equiv Submodule.topEquiv
instance : InfSet (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun S ↦
{ carrier := ⋂ s ∈ S, (s : Set M)
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
private theorem sInf_le' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : p ∈ S → sInf S ≤ p :=
Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
private theorem le_sInf' {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {p} : (∀ q ∈ S, p ≤ q) → p ≤ sInf S :=
Set.subset_iInter₂
instance : Inf (Submodule R M) :=
⟨fun p q ↦
{ carrier := p ∩ q
zero_mem' := by simp [zero_mem]
add_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [add_mem]
smul_mem' := by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [smul_mem] }⟩
instance completeLattice : CompleteLattice (Submodule R M) :=
{ (inferInstance : OrderTop (Submodule R M)),
(inferInstance : OrderBot (Submodule R M)) with
sup := fun a b ↦ sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ ↦ h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf' fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ ↦ h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ sInf_le' ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ↦ Set.subset_inter
inf_le_left := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_left
inf_le_right := fun _ _ ↦ Set.inter_subset_right
le_sSup := fun _ _ hs ↦ le_sInf' fun _ hq ↦ by exact hq _ hs
sSup_le := fun _ _ hs ↦ sInf_le' hs
le_sInf := fun _ _ ↦ le_sInf'
sInf_le := fun _ _ ↦ sInf_le' }
#align submodule.complete_lattice Submodule.completeLattice
@[simp]
theorem inf_coe : ↑(p ⊓ q) = (p ∩ q : Set M) :=
rfl
#align submodule.inf_coe Submodule.inf_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf {p q : Submodule R M} {x : M} : x ∈ p ⊓ q ↔ x ∈ p ∧ x ∈ q :=
Iff.rfl
#align submodule.mem_inf Submodule.mem_inf
@[simp]
theorem sInf_coe (P : Set (Submodule R M)) : (↑(sInf P) : Set M) = ⋂ p ∈ P, ↑p :=
rfl
#align submodule.Inf_coe Submodule.sInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem finset_inf_coe {ι} (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → Submodule R M) :
(↑(s.inf p) : Set M) = ⋂ i ∈ s, ↑(p i) := by
letI := Classical.decEq ι
refine s.induction_on ?_ fun i s _ ih ↦ ?_
· simp
· rw [Finset.inf_insert, inf_coe, ih]
simp
#align submodule.finset_inf_coe Submodule.finset_inf_coe
@[simp]
theorem iInf_coe {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) : (↑(⨅ i, p i) : Set M) = ⋂ i, ↑(p i) := by
rw [iInf, sInf_coe]; simp only [Set.mem_range, Set.iInter_exists, Set.iInter_iInter_eq']
#align submodule.infi_coe Submodule.iInf_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf {S : Set (Submodule R M)} {x : M} : x ∈ sInf S ↔ ∀ p ∈ S, x ∈ p :=
Set.mem_iInter₂
#align submodule.mem_Inf Submodule.mem_sInf
@[simp]
theorem mem_iInf {ι} (p : ι → Submodule R M) {x} : (x ∈ ⨅ i, p i) ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ p i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, iInf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]; rfl
#align submodule.mem_infi Submodule.mem_iInf
@[simp]
theorem mem_finset_inf {ι} {s : Finset ι} {p : ι → Submodule R M} {x : M} :
x ∈ s.inf p ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, x ∈ p i := by
simp only [← SetLike.mem_coe, finset_inf_coe, Set.mem_iInter]
#align submodule.mem_finset_inf Submodule.mem_finset_inf
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Lattice.lean | 271 | 274 | theorem mem_sup_left {S T : Submodule R M} : ∀ {x : M}, x ∈ S → x ∈ S ⊔ T := by |
have : S ≤ S ⊔ T := le_sup_left
rw [LE.le] at this
exact this
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 217 | 221 | theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by |
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
|
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pointwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
#align_import algebra.group.unique_prods from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
@[to_additive
"Let `G` be a Type with addition, let `A B : Finset G` be finite subsets and
let `a0 b0 : G` be two elements. `UniqueAdd A B a0 b0` asserts `a0 + b0` can be written in at
most one way as a sum of an element from `A` and an element from `B`."]
def UniqueMul {G} [Mul G] (A B : Finset G) (a0 b0 : G) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b⦄, a ∈ A → b ∈ B → a * b = a0 * b0 → a = a0 ∧ b = b0
#align unique_mul UniqueMul
#align unique_add UniqueAdd
namespace UniqueMul
variable {G H : Type*} [Mul G] [Mul H] {A B : Finset G} {a0 b0 : G}
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality, simp)]
theorem of_subsingleton [Subsingleton G] : UniqueMul A B a0 b0 := by
simp [UniqueMul, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem of_card_le_one (hA : A.Nonempty) (hB : B.Nonempty) (hA1 : A.card ≤ 1) (hB1 : B.card ≤ 1) :
∃ a ∈ A, ∃ b ∈ B, UniqueMul A B a b := by
rw [Finset.card_le_one_iff] at hA1 hB1
obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := hA; obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := hB
exact ⟨a, ha, b, hb, fun _ _ ha' hb' _ ↦ ⟨hA1 ha' ha, hB1 hb' hb⟩⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mt (h : UniqueMul A B a0 b0) :
∀ ⦃a b⦄, a ∈ A → b ∈ B → a ≠ a0 ∨ b ≠ b0 → a * b ≠ a0 * b0 := fun _ _ ha hb k ↦ by
contrapose! k
exact h ha hb k
#align unique_mul.mt UniqueMul.mt
@[to_additive]
theorem subsingleton (h : UniqueMul A B a0 b0) :
Subsingleton { ab : G × G // ab.1 ∈ A ∧ ab.2 ∈ B ∧ ab.1 * ab.2 = a0 * b0 } :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_a, _b⟩, ha, hb, ab⟩ ⟨⟨_a', _b'⟩, ha', hb', ab'⟩ ↦
Subtype.ext <|
Prod.ext ((h ha hb ab).1.trans (h ha' hb' ab').1.symm) <|
(h ha hb ab).2.trans (h ha' hb' ab').2.symm⟩
#align unique_mul.subsingleton UniqueMul.subsingleton
#align unique_add.subsingleton UniqueAdd.subsingleton
@[to_additive]
theorem set_subsingleton (h : UniqueMul A B a0 b0) :
Set.Subsingleton { ab : G × G | ab.1 ∈ A ∧ ab.2 ∈ B ∧ ab.1 * ab.2 = a0 * b0 } := by
rintro ⟨x1, y1⟩ (hx : x1 ∈ A ∧ y1 ∈ B ∧ x1 * y1 = a0 * b0) ⟨x2, y2⟩
(hy : x2 ∈ A ∧ y2 ∈ B ∧ x2 * y2 = a0 * b0)
rcases h hx.1 hx.2.1 hx.2.2 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h hy.1 hy.2.1 hy.2.2 with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rfl
#align unique_mul.set_subsingleton UniqueMul.set_subsingleton
#align unique_add.set_subsingleton UniqueAdd.set_subsingleton
-- Porting note: mathport warning: expanding binder collection
-- (ab «expr ∈ » [finset.product/multiset.product/set.prod/list.product](A, B)) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem iff_existsUnique (aA : a0 ∈ A) (bB : b0 ∈ B) :
UniqueMul A B a0 b0 ↔ ∃! ab, ab ∈ A ×ˢ B ∧ ab.1 * ab.2 = a0 * b0 :=
⟨fun _ ↦ ⟨(a0, b0), ⟨Finset.mk_mem_product aA bB, rfl⟩, by simpa⟩,
fun h ↦ h.elim
(by
rintro ⟨x1, x2⟩ _ J x y hx hy l
rcases Prod.mk.inj_iff.mp (J (a0, b0) ⟨Finset.mk_mem_product aA bB, rfl⟩) with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Prod.mk.inj_iff.mp (J (x, y) ⟨Finset.mk_mem_product hx hy, l⟩))⟩
#align unique_mul.iff_exists_unique UniqueMul.iff_existsUniqueₓ
#align unique_add.iff_exists_unique UniqueAdd.iff_existsUniqueₓ
open Finset in
@[to_additive]
theorem iff_card_le_one [DecidableEq G] (ha0 : a0 ∈ A) (hb0 : b0 ∈ B) :
UniqueMul A B a0 b0 ↔ ((A ×ˢ B).filter (fun p ↦ p.1 * p.2 = a0 * b0)).card ≤ 1 := by
simp_rw [card_le_one_iff, mem_filter, mem_product]
refine ⟨fun h p1 p2 ⟨⟨ha1, hb1⟩, he1⟩ ⟨⟨ha2, hb2⟩, he2⟩ ↦ ?_, fun h a b ha hb he ↦ ?_⟩
· have h1 := h ha1 hb1 he1; have h2 := h ha2 hb2 he2
ext
· rw [h1.1, h2.1]
· rw [h1.2, h2.2]
· exact Prod.ext_iff.1 (@h (a, b) (a0, b0) ⟨⟨ha, hb⟩, he⟩ ⟨⟨ha0, hb0⟩, rfl⟩)
-- Porting note: mathport warning: expanding binder collection
-- (ab «expr ∈ » [finset.product/multiset.product/set.prod/list.product](A, B)) -/
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_iff_exists_existsUnique :
(∃ a0 b0 : G, a0 ∈ A ∧ b0 ∈ B ∧ UniqueMul A B a0 b0) ↔
∃ g : G, ∃! ab, ab ∈ A ×ˢ B ∧ ab.1 * ab.2 = g :=
⟨fun ⟨a0, b0, hA, hB, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, (iff_existsUnique hA hB).mp h⟩, fun ⟨g, h⟩ ↦ by
have h' := h
rcases h' with ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨hab, rfl, -⟩, -⟩
cases' Finset.mem_product.mp hab with ha hb
exact ⟨a, b, ha, hb, (iff_existsUnique ha hb).mpr h⟩⟩
#align unique_mul.exists_iff_exists_exists_unique UniqueMul.exists_iff_exists_existsUniqueₓ
#align unique_add.exists_iff_exists_exists_unique UniqueAdd.exists_iff_exists_existsUniqueₓ
@[to_additive "`UniqueAdd` is preserved by inverse images under injective, additive maps."]
theorem mulHom_preimage (f : G →ₙ* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) (a0 b0 : G) {A B : Finset H}
(u : UniqueMul A B (f a0) (f b0)) :
UniqueMul (A.preimage f hf.injOn) (B.preimage f hf.injOn) a0 b0 := by
intro a b ha hb ab
simp only [← hf.eq_iff, map_mul] at ab ⊢
exact u (Finset.mem_preimage.mp ha) (Finset.mem_preimage.mp hb) ab
#align unique_mul.mul_hom_preimage UniqueMul.mulHom_preimage
#align unique_add.add_hom_preimage UniqueAdd.addHom_preimage
@[to_additive] theorem of_mulHom_image [DecidableEq H] (f : G →ₙ* H)
(hf : ∀ ⦃a b c d : G⦄, a * b = c * d → f a = f c ∧ f b = f d → a = c ∧ b = d)
(h : UniqueMul (A.image f) (B.image f) (f a0) (f b0)) : UniqueMul A B a0 b0 :=
fun a b ha hb ab ↦ hf ab
(h (Finset.mem_image_of_mem f ha) (Finset.mem_image_of_mem f hb) <| by simp_rw [← map_mul, ab])
@[to_additive
"`UniqueAdd` is preserved under additive maps that are injective.
See `UniqueAdd.addHom_map_iff` for a version with swapped bundling."]
theorem mulHom_image_iff [DecidableEq H] (f : G →ₙ* H) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
UniqueMul (A.image f) (B.image f) (f a0) (f b0) ↔ UniqueMul A B a0 b0 :=
⟨of_mulHom_image f fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ .imp (hf ·) (hf ·), fun h _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [Finset.mem_image]
rintro ⟨a, aA, rfl⟩ ⟨b, bB, rfl⟩ ab
simp_rw [← map_mul, hf.eq_iff] at ab ⊢
exact h aA bB ab⟩
#align unique_mul.mul_hom_image_iff UniqueMul.mulHom_image_iff
#align unique_add.add_hom_image_iff UniqueAdd.addHom_image_iff
@[to_additive
"`UniqueAdd` is preserved under embeddings that are additive.
See `UniqueAdd.addHom_image_iff` for a version with swapped bundling."]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/UniqueProds.lean | 186 | 188 | theorem mulHom_map_iff (f : G ↪ H) (mul : ∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) :
UniqueMul (A.map f) (B.map f) (f a0) (f b0) ↔ UniqueMul A B a0 b0 := by |
classical simp_rw [← mulHom_image_iff ⟨f, mul⟩ f.2, Finset.map_eq_image]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.list.pairwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
open Nat Function
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*} {R S T : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
mk_iff_of_inductive_prop List.Pairwise List.pairwise_iff
#align list.pairwise_iff List.pairwise_iff
#align list.pairwise.nil List.Pairwise.nil
#align list.pairwise.cons List.Pairwise.cons
#align list.rel_of_pairwise_cons List.rel_of_pairwise_cons
#align list.pairwise.of_cons List.Pairwise.of_cons
#align list.pairwise.tail List.Pairwise.tail
#align list.pairwise.drop List.Pairwise.drop
#align list.pairwise.imp_of_mem List.Pairwise.imp_of_mem
#align list.pairwise.imp List.Pairwise.impₓ -- Implicits Order
#align list.pairwise_and_iff List.pairwise_and_iff
#align list.pairwise.and List.Pairwise.and
#align list.pairwise.imp₂ List.Pairwise.imp₂
#align list.pairwise.iff_of_mem List.Pairwise.iff_of_mem
#align list.pairwise.iff List.Pairwise.iff
#align list.pairwise_of_forall List.pairwise_of_forall
#align list.pairwise.and_mem List.Pairwise.and_mem
#align list.pairwise.imp_mem List.Pairwise.imp_mem
#align list.pairwise.sublist List.Pairwise.sublistₓ -- Implicits order
#align list.pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip List.Pairwise.forall_of_forall_of_flip
theorem Pairwise.forall_of_forall (H : Symmetric R) (H₁ : ∀ x ∈ l, R x x) (H₂ : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ l → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ l → R x y :=
H₂.forall_of_forall_of_flip H₁ <| by rwa [H.flip_eq]
#align list.pairwise.forall_of_forall List.Pairwise.forall_of_forall
theorem Pairwise.forall (hR : Symmetric R) (hl : l.Pairwise R) :
∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ l → a ≠ b → R a b := by
apply Pairwise.forall_of_forall
· exact fun a b h hne => hR (h hne.symm)
· exact fun _ _ hx => (hx rfl).elim
· exact hl.imp (@fun a b h _ => by exact h)
#align list.pairwise.forall List.Pairwise.forall
theorem Pairwise.set_pairwise (hl : Pairwise R l) (hr : Symmetric R) : { x | x ∈ l }.Pairwise R :=
hl.forall hr
#align list.pairwise.set_pairwise List.Pairwise.set_pairwise
#align list.pairwise_singleton List.pairwise_singleton
#align list.pairwise_pair List.pairwise_pair
#align list.pairwise_append List.pairwise_append
#align list.pairwise_append_comm List.pairwise_append_comm
#align list.pairwise_middle List.pairwise_middle
-- Porting note: Duplicate of `pairwise_map` but with `f` explicit.
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-25")] theorem pairwise_map' (f : β → α) :
∀ {l : List β}, Pairwise R (map f l) ↔ Pairwise (fun a b : β => R (f a) (f b)) l
| [] => by simp only [map, Pairwise.nil]
| b :: l => by
simp only [map, pairwise_cons, mem_map, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, pairwise_map]
#align list.pairwise_map List.pairwise_map'
#align list.pairwise.of_map List.Pairwise.of_map
#align list.pairwise.map List.Pairwise.map
#align list.pairwise_filter_map List.pairwise_filterMap
#align list.pairwise.filter_map List.Pairwise.filter_map
#align list.pairwise_filter List.pairwise_filter
#align list.pairwise.filter List.Pairwise.filterₓ
theorem pairwise_pmap {p : β → Prop} {f : ∀ b, p b → α} {l : List β} (h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x) :
Pairwise R (l.pmap f h) ↔
Pairwise (fun b₁ b₂ => ∀ (h₁ : p b₁) (h₂ : p b₂), R (f b₁ h₁) (f b₂ h₂)) l := by
induction' l with a l ihl
· simp
obtain ⟨_, hl⟩ : p a ∧ ∀ b, b ∈ l → p b := by simpa using h
simp only [ihl hl, pairwise_cons, exists₂_imp, pmap, and_congr_left_iff, mem_pmap]
refine fun _ => ⟨fun H b hb _ hpb => H _ _ hb rfl, ?_⟩
rintro H _ b hb rfl
exact H b hb _ _
#align list.pairwise_pmap List.pairwise_pmap
| Mathlib/Data/List/Pairwise.lean | 136 | 141 | theorem Pairwise.pmap {l : List α} (hl : Pairwise R l) {p : α → Prop} {f : ∀ a, p a → β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ l, p x) {S : β → β → Prop}
(hS : ∀ ⦃x⦄ (hx : p x) ⦃y⦄ (hy : p y), R x y → S (f x hx) (f y hy)) :
Pairwise S (l.pmap f h) := by |
refine (pairwise_pmap h).2 (Pairwise.imp_of_mem ?_ hl)
intros; apply hS; assumption
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import analysis.normed.group.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c8f305514e0d47dfaa710f5a52f0d21b588e6328"
open Metric Set Pointwise Topology
variable {E : Type*}
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] {ε δ : ℝ} {s t : Set E} {x y : E}
-- note: we can't use `LipschitzOnWith.isBounded_image2` here without adding `[IsometricSMul E E]`
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Pointwise.lean | 30 | 35 | theorem Bornology.IsBounded.mul (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s * t) := by |
obtain ⟨Rs, hRs⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R := hs.exists_norm_le'
obtain ⟨Rt, hRt⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ t, ‖x‖ ≤ R := ht.exists_norm_le'
refine isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.2 ⟨Rs + Rt, ?_⟩
rintro z ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact norm_mul_le_of_le (hRs x hx) (hRt y hy)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrongEpi
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.LiftingProperties.Adjunction
#align_import category_theory.functor.epi_mono from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32253a1a1071173b33dc7d6a218cf722c6feb514"
open CategoryTheory
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory.Functor
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] {E : Type u₃}
[Category.{v₃} E]
class PreservesMonomorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f], Mono (F.map f)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.PreservesMonomorphisms
instance map_mono (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesMonomorphisms F] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
Mono (F.map f) :=
PreservesMonomorphisms.preserves f
#align category_theory.functor.map_mono CategoryTheory.Functor.map_mono
class PreservesEpimorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
preserves : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f], Epi (F.map f)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.PreservesEpimorphisms
instance map_epi (F : C ⥤ D) [PreservesEpimorphisms F] {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] :
Epi (F.map f) :=
PreservesEpimorphisms.preserves f
#align category_theory.functor.map_epi CategoryTheory.Functor.map_epi
class ReflectsMonomorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
reflects : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), Mono (F.map f) → Mono f
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsMonomorphisms
theorem mono_of_mono_map (F : C ⥤ D) [ReflectsMonomorphisms F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(h : Mono (F.map f)) : Mono f :=
ReflectsMonomorphisms.reflects f h
#align category_theory.functor.mono_of_mono_map CategoryTheory.Functor.mono_of_mono_map
class ReflectsEpimorphisms (F : C ⥤ D) : Prop where
reflects : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), Epi (F.map f) → Epi f
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms CategoryTheory.Functor.ReflectsEpimorphisms
theorem epi_of_epi_map (F : C ⥤ D) [ReflectsEpimorphisms F] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
(h : Epi (F.map f)) : Epi f :=
ReflectsEpimorphisms.reflects f h
#align category_theory.functor.epi_of_epi_map CategoryTheory.Functor.epi_of_epi_map
instance preservesMonomorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [PreservesMonomorphisms F]
[PreservesMonomorphisms G] : PreservesMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
preserves f h := by
rw [comp_map]
exact inferInstance
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_comp
instance preservesEpimorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [PreservesEpimorphisms F]
[PreservesEpimorphisms G] : PreservesEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
preserves f h := by
rw [comp_map]
exact inferInstance
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_comp
instance reflectsMonomorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [ReflectsMonomorphisms F]
[ReflectsMonomorphisms G] : ReflectsMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
reflects _ h := F.mono_of_mono_map (G.mono_of_mono_map h)
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_comp
instance reflectsEpimorphisms_comp (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E) [ReflectsEpimorphisms F]
[ReflectsEpimorphisms G] : ReflectsEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G) where
reflects _ h := F.epi_of_epi_map (G.epi_of_epi_map h)
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_comp CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_comp
theorem preservesEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G)] [ReflectsEpimorphisms G] : PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => G.epi_of_epi_map <| show Epi ((F ⋙ G).map f) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G)] [ReflectsMonomorphisms G] : PreservesMonomorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => G.mono_of_mono_map <| show Mono ((F ⋙ G).map f) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesEpimorphisms G] [ReflectsEpimorphisms (F ⋙ G)] : ReflectsEpimorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => (F ⋙ G).epi_of_epi_map <| show Epi (G.map (F.map f)) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) (G : D ⥤ E)
[PreservesMonomorphisms G] [ReflectsMonomorphisms (F ⋙ G)] : ReflectsMonomorphisms F :=
⟨fun f _ => (F ⋙ G).mono_of_mono_map <| show Mono (G.map (F.map f)) from inferInstance⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_of_preserves_of_reflects
theorem preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [PreservesMonomorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
haveI : Mono (F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom) := mono_comp _ _
convert (mono_comp _ _ : Mono ((α.app X).inv ≫ F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom))
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso
theorem preservesMonomorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms F ↔ PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => preservesMonomorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms.iso_iff
theorem preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [PreservesEpimorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
haveI : Epi (F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom) := epi_comp _ _
convert (epi_comp _ _ : Epi ((α.app X).inv ≫ F.map f ≫ (α.app Y).hom))
rw [Iso.eq_inv_comp, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso
theorem preservesEpimorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms F ↔ PreservesEpimorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => preservesEpimorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms.iso_iff
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [ReflectsMonomorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsMonomorphisms G :=
{ reflects := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
apply F.mono_of_mono_map
haveI : Mono (G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv) := mono_comp _ _
convert (mono_comp _ _ : Mono ((α.app X).hom ≫ G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv))
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso
theorem reflectsMonomorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsMonomorphisms F ↔ ReflectsMonomorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => reflectsMonomorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms.iso_iff
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso {F G : C ⥤ D} [ReflectsEpimorphisms F] (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsEpimorphisms G :=
{ reflects := fun {X} {Y} f h => by
apply F.epi_of_epi_map
haveI : Epi (G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv) := epi_comp _ _
convert (epi_comp _ _ : Epi ((α.app X).hom ≫ G.map f ≫ (α.app Y).inv))
rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv, Iso.app_hom, Iso.app_hom, NatTrans.naturality] }
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms.of_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso
theorem reflectsEpimorphisms.iso_iff {F G : C ⥤ D} (α : F ≅ G) :
ReflectsEpimorphisms F ↔ ReflectsEpimorphisms G :=
⟨fun _ => reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso α, fun _ => reflectsEpimorphisms.of_iso α.symm⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms.iso_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms.iso_iff
theorem preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G) :
PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f hf =>
⟨by
intro Z g h H
replace H := congr_arg (adj.homEquiv X Z) H
rwa [adj.homEquiv_naturality_left, adj.homEquiv_naturality_left, cancel_epi,
Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H⟩ }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphsisms_of_adjunction CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction
instance (priority := 100) preservesEpimorphisms_of_isLeftAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsLeftAdjoint F] :
PreservesEpimorphisms F :=
preservesEpimorphsisms_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsLeftAdjoint F)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_epimorphisms_of_is_left_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesEpimorphisms_of_isLeftAdjoint
theorem preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction {F : C ⥤ D} {G : D ⥤ C} (adj : F ⊣ G) :
PreservesMonomorphisms G :=
{ preserves := fun {X} {Y} f hf =>
⟨by
intro Z g h H
replace H := congr_arg (adj.homEquiv Z Y).symm H
rwa [adj.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, adj.homEquiv_naturality_right_symm, cancel_mono,
Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq] at H⟩ }
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_adjunction CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction
instance (priority := 100) preservesMonomorphisms_of_isRightAdjoint (F : C ⥤ D) [IsRightAdjoint F] :
PreservesMonomorphisms F :=
preservesMonomorphisms_of_adjunction (Adjunction.ofIsRightAdjoint F)
#align category_theory.functor.preserves_monomorphisms_of_is_right_adjoint CategoryTheory.Functor.preservesMonomorphisms_of_isRightAdjoint
instance (priority := 100) reflectsMonomorphisms_of_faithful (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
ReflectsMonomorphisms F where
reflects {X} {Y} f hf :=
⟨fun {Z} g h hgh =>
F.map_injective ((cancel_mono (F.map f)).1 (by rw [← F.map_comp, hgh, F.map_comp]))⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_monomorphisms_of_faithful CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsMonomorphisms_of_faithful
instance (priority := 100) reflectsEpimorphisms_of_faithful (F : C ⥤ D) [Faithful F] :
ReflectsEpimorphisms F where
reflects {X} {Y} f hf :=
⟨fun {Z} g h hgh =>
F.map_injective ((cancel_epi (F.map f)).1 (by rw [← F.map_comp, hgh, F.map_comp]))⟩
#align category_theory.functor.reflects_epimorphisms_of_faithful CategoryTheory.Functor.reflectsEpimorphisms_of_faithful
section
variable (F : C ⥤ D) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
noncomputable def splitEpiEquiv [Full F] [Faithful F] : SplitEpi f ≃ SplitEpi (F.map f) where
toFun f := f.map F
invFun s := ⟨F.preimage s.section_, by
apply F.map_injective
simp only [map_comp, map_preimage, map_id]
apply SplitEpi.id⟩
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv x := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.functor.split_epi_equiv CategoryTheory.Functor.splitEpiEquiv
@[simp]
theorem isSplitEpi_iff [Full F] [Faithful F] : IsSplitEpi (F.map f) ↔ IsSplitEpi f := by
constructor
· intro h
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ((splitEpiEquiv F f).invFun h.exists_splitEpi.some)
· intro h
exact IsSplitEpi.mk' ((splitEpiEquiv F f).toFun h.exists_splitEpi.some)
#align category_theory.functor.is_split_epi_iff CategoryTheory.Functor.isSplitEpi_iff
noncomputable def splitMonoEquiv [Full F] [Faithful F] : SplitMono f ≃ SplitMono (F.map f) where
toFun f := f.map F
invFun s := ⟨F.preimage s.retraction, by
apply F.map_injective
simp only [map_comp, map_preimage, map_id]
apply SplitMono.id⟩
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv x := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.functor.split_mono_equiv CategoryTheory.Functor.splitMonoEquiv
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Functor/EpiMono.lean | 255 | 260 | theorem isSplitMono_iff [Full F] [Faithful F] : IsSplitMono (F.map f) ↔ IsSplitMono f := by |
constructor
· intro h
exact IsSplitMono.mk' ((splitMonoEquiv F f).invFun h.exists_splitMono.some)
· intro h
exact IsSplitMono.mk' ((splitMonoEquiv F f).toFun h.exists_splitMono.some)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.DiscreteCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Terminal
#align_import category_theory.limits.shapes.binary_products from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fec1d95fc61c750c1ddbb5b1f7f48b8e811a80d7"
noncomputable section
universe v u u₂
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
inductive WalkingPair : Type
| left
| right
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair
open WalkingPair
def WalkingPair.swap : WalkingPair ≃ WalkingPair where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
invFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_left : WalkingPair.swap left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_apply_right : WalkingPair.swap right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt : WalkingPair.swap.symm left = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_tt
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff : WalkingPair.swap.symm right = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.swap_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.swap_symm_apply_ff
def WalkingPair.equivBool : WalkingPair ≃ Bool where
toFun j := WalkingPair.recOn j true false
-- to match equiv.sum_equiv_sigma_bool
invFun b := Bool.recOn b right left
left_inv j := by cases j; repeat rfl
right_inv b := by cases b; repeat rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left : WalkingPair.equivBool left = true :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_left CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right : WalkingPair.equivBool right = false :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_apply_right CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm true = left :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_tt CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_true
@[simp]
theorem WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false : WalkingPair.equivBool.symm false = right :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.walking_pair.equiv_bool_symm_apply_ff CategoryTheory.Limits.WalkingPair.equivBool_symm_apply_false
variable {C : Type u}
def pairFunction (X Y : C) : WalkingPair → C := fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_left (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y left = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_left
@[simp]
theorem pairFunction_right (X Y : C) : pairFunction X Y right = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_function_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pairFunction_right
variable [Category.{v} C]
def pair (X Y : C) : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C :=
Discrete.functor fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j X Y
#align category_theory.limits.pair CategoryTheory.Limits.pair
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_left (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨left⟩ = X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_left CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_left
@[simp]
theorem pair_obj_right (X Y : C) : (pair X Y).obj ⟨right⟩ = Y :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.pair_obj_right CategoryTheory.Limits.pair_obj_right
section
variable {F G : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C} (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨left⟩)
(g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ⟶ G.obj ⟨right⟩)
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
def mapPair : F ⟶ G where
app j := Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g
naturality := fun ⟨X⟩ ⟨Y⟩ ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_left : (mapPair f g).app ⟨left⟩ = f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_left CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_left
@[simp]
theorem mapPair_right : (mapPair f g).app ⟨right⟩ = g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_right CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPair_right
@[simps!]
def mapPairIso (f : F.obj ⟨left⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨left⟩) (g : F.obj ⟨right⟩ ≅ G.obj ⟨right⟩) : F ≅ G :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j f g)
(fun ⟨⟨u⟩⟩ => by aesop_cat)
#align category_theory.limits.map_pair_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.mapPairIso
end
@[simps!]
def diagramIsoPair (F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C) :
F ≅ pair (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) :=
mapPairIso (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _)
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_iso_pair CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramIsoPair
section
variable {D : Type u} [Category.{v} D]
def pairComp (X Y : C) (F : C ⥤ D) : pair X Y ⋙ F ≅ pair (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) :=
diagramIsoPair _
#align category_theory.limits.pair_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.pairComp
end
abbrev BinaryFan (X Y : C) :=
Cone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan
abbrev BinaryFan.fst {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.fst
abbrev BinaryFan.snd {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) :=
s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.fst :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.π_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y) : s.π.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.snd :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.π_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.π_app_right
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryFan X Y)
(lift : ∀ {T : C} (_ : T ⟶ X) (_ : T ⟶ Y), T ⟶ s.pt)
(hl₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.fst = f)
(hl₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y), lift f g ≫ s.snd = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : T ⟶ X) (g : T ⟶ Y) (m : T ⟶ s.pt) (_ : m ≫ s.fst = f) (_ : m ≫ s.snd = g),
m = lift f g) :
IsLimit s :=
Limits.IsLimit.mk (fun t => lift (BinaryFan.fst t) (BinaryFan.snd t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hl₁ _ _
· exact hl₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk
theorem BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) {f g : W ⟶ s.pt}
(h₁ : f ≫ s.fst = g ≫ s.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ s.snd = g ≫ s.snd) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext
abbrev BinaryCofan (X Y : C) := Cocone (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan
abbrev BinaryCofan.inl {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inl
abbrev BinaryCofan.inr {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) := s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.inr
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_left {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩ = s.inl := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_left CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_left
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.ι_app_right {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y) :
s.ι.app ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩ = s.inr := rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.ι_app_right CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.ι_app_right
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk {X Y : C} (s : BinaryCofan X Y)
(desc : ∀ {T : C} (_ : X ⟶ T) (_ : Y ⟶ T), s.pt ⟶ T)
(hd₁ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inl ≫ desc f g = f)
(hd₂ : ∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T), s.inr ≫ desc f g = g)
(uniq :
∀ {T : C} (f : X ⟶ T) (g : Y ⟶ T) (m : s.pt ⟶ T) (_ : s.inl ≫ m = f) (_ : s.inr ≫ m = g),
m = desc f g) :
IsColimit s :=
Limits.IsColimit.mk (fun t => desc (BinaryCofan.inl t) (BinaryCofan.inr t))
(by
rintro t (rfl | rfl)
· exact hd₁ _ _
· exact hd₂ _ _)
fun t m h => uniq _ _ _ (h ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (h ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk
theorem BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s)
{f g : s.pt ⟶ W} (h₁ : s.inl ≫ f = s.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : s.inr ≫ f = s.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
h.hom_ext fun j => Discrete.recOn j fun j => WalkingPair.casesOn j h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext
variable {X Y : C}
section
attribute [local aesop safe tactic (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
CategoryTheory.Discrete.discreteCases
-- Porting note: would it be okay to use this more generally?
attribute [local aesop safe cases (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])] Eq
@[simps pt]
def BinaryFan.mk {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : BinaryFan X Y where
pt := P
π :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk
@[simps pt]
def BinaryCofan.mk {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : BinaryCofan X Y where
pt := P
ι :=
{ app := fun ⟨j⟩ => by cases j <;> simpa }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk
end
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_fst {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).fst = π₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_fst
@[simp]
theorem BinaryFan.mk_snd {P : C} (π₁ : P ⟶ X) (π₂ : P ⟶ Y) : (BinaryFan.mk π₁ π₂).snd = π₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.mk_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.mk_snd
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inl {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inl = ι₁ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inl
@[simp]
theorem BinaryCofan.mk_inr {P : C} (ι₁ : X ⟶ P) (ι₂ : Y ⟶ P) : (BinaryCofan.mk ι₁ ι₂).inr = ι₂ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.mk_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.mk_inr
def isoBinaryFanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryFan.mk c.fst c.snd :=
Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_fan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryFanMk
def isoBinaryCofanMk {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) : c ≅ BinaryCofan.mk c.inl c.inr :=
Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) fun j => by cases' j with l; cases l; repeat simp
#align category_theory.limits.iso_binary_cofan_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.isoBinaryCofanMk
def BinaryFan.isLimitMk {W : C} {fst : W ⟶ X} {snd : W ⟶ Y} (lift : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, s.pt ⟶ W)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ fst = s.fst)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryFan X Y, lift s ≫ snd = s.snd)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryFan X Y) (m : s.pt ⟶ W) (_ : m ≫ fst = s.fst) (_ : m ≫ snd = s.snd),
m = lift s) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk fst snd) :=
{ lift := lift
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitMk
def BinaryCofan.isColimitMk {W : C} {inl : X ⟶ W} {inr : Y ⟶ W}
(desc : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, W ⟶ s.pt)
(fac_left : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inl ≫ desc s = s.inl)
(fac_right : ∀ s : BinaryCofan X Y, inr ≫ desc s = s.inr)
(uniq :
∀ (s : BinaryCofan X Y) (m : W ⟶ s.pt) (_ : inl ≫ m = s.inl) (_ : inr ≫ m = s.inr),
m = desc s) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk inl inr) :=
{ desc := desc
fac := fun s j => by
rcases j with ⟨⟨⟩⟩
exacts [fac_left s, fac_right s]
uniq := fun s m w => uniq s m (w ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩) (w ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩) }
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_mk CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
@[simps]
def BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryFan X Y} (h : IsLimit s) (f : W ⟶ X)
(g : W ⟶ Y) : { l : W ⟶ s.pt // l ≫ s.fst = f ∧ l ≫ s.snd = g } :=
⟨h.lift <| BinaryFan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift'
@[simps]
def BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' {W X Y : C} {s : BinaryCofan X Y} (h : IsColimit s) (f : X ⟶ W)
(g : Y ⟶ W) : { l : s.pt ⟶ W // s.inl ≫ l = f ∧ s.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨h.desc <| BinaryCofan.mk f g, h.fac _ _, h.fac _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc'
def BinaryFan.isLimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryFan X Y} (hc : IsLimit c) :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitMk (fun s => hc.lift (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryFan.mk s.snd s.fst) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitFlip
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal Y) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.fst := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryFan.IsLimit.lift' H (𝟙 X) (h.from X)
exact
⟨⟨l,
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext H (by simpa [hl, -Category.comp_id] using Category.comp_id _)
(h.hom_ext _ _),
hl⟩⟩
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryFan.IsLimit.mk _ (fun f _ => f ≫ inv c.fst) (fun _ _ => by simp)
(fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ => by simp [← e]⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst
theorem BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd {X Y : C} (h : IsTerminal X) (c : BinaryFan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsLimit c) ↔ IsIso c.snd := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_fst h (BinaryFan.mk c.snd c.fst))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h.some).ofIsoLimit (isoBinaryFanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_iff_is_iso_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimit_iff_isIso_snd
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : X ⟶ X')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (c.fst ≫ f) c.snd) := by
fapply BinaryFan.isLimitMk
· exact fun s => h.lift (BinaryFan.mk (s.fst ≫ inv f) s.snd)
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [Category.comp_id,BinaryFan.π_app_left,IsIso.inv_hom_id,
BinaryFan.mk_fst,IsLimit.fac_assoc,eq_self_iff_true,Category.assoc]
· intro s -- Porting note: simp timed out here
simp only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,eq_self_iff_true,IsLimit.fac]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
-- Porting note: simpa timed out here also
apply BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext h
· simpa only
[BinaryFan.π_app_left,BinaryFan.mk_fst,Category.assoc,IsLimit.fac,IsIso.eq_comp_inv]
· simpa only [BinaryFan.π_app_right,BinaryFan.mk_snd,IsLimit.fac]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryFan X Y) (f : Y ⟶ Y')
[IsIso f] (h : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk c.fst (c.snd ≫ f)) :=
BinaryFan.isLimitFlip <| BinaryFan.isLimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryFan.isLimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_fan.is_limit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryFan.isLimitCompRightIso
def BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip {X Y : C} {c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitMk (fun s => hc.desc (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl)) (fun _ => hc.fac _ _)
(fun _ => hc.fac _ _) fun s _ e₁ e₂ =>
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext hc
(e₂.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩).symm)
(e₁.trans (hc.fac (BinaryCofan.mk s.inr s.inl) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩).symm)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_flip CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial Y) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inl := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨H⟩
obtain ⟨l, hl, -⟩ := BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' H (𝟙 X) (h.to X)
refine ⟨⟨l, hl, BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext H (?_) (h.hom_ext _ _)⟩⟩
rw [Category.comp_id]
have e : (inl c ≫ l) ≫ inl c = 𝟙 X ≫ inl c := congrArg (·≫inl c) hl
rwa [Category.assoc,Category.id_comp] at e
· intro
exact
⟨BinaryCofan.IsColimit.mk _ (fun f _ => inv c.inl ≫ f)
(fun _ _ => IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc _ _) (fun _ _ => h.hom_ext _ _) fun _ _ _ e _ =>
(IsIso.eq_inv_comp _).mpr e⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inl CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl
theorem BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr {X Y : C} (h : IsInitial X) (c : BinaryCofan X Y) :
Nonempty (IsColimit c) ↔ IsIso c.inr := by
refine Iff.trans ?_ (BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inl h (BinaryCofan.mk c.inr c.inl))
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some⟩, fun h =>
⟨(BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h.some).ofIsoColimit (isoBinaryCofanMk c).symm⟩⟩
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_iff_is_iso_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso {X Y X' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : X' ⟶ X)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (f ≫ c.inl) c.inr) := by
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s => h.desc (BinaryCofan.mk (inv f ≫ s.inl) s.inr)
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
· intro s
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simp only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
· intro s m e₁ e₂
apply BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext h
· rw [← cancel_epi f]
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_left,eq_self_iff_true,
Category.assoc,BinaryCofan.mk_inl,IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc] using e₁
-- Porting note: simp timed out here too
· simpa only [IsColimit.fac,BinaryCofan.ι_app_right,eq_self_iff_true,BinaryCofan.mk_inr]
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_left_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso
noncomputable def BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso {X Y Y' : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y) (f : Y' ⟶ Y)
[IsIso f] (h : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk c.inl (f ≫ c.inr)) :=
BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip <| BinaryCofan.isColimitCompLeftIso _ f (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip h)
#align category_theory.limits.binary_cofan.is_colimit_comp_right_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.BinaryCofan.isColimitCompRightIso
abbrev HasBinaryProduct (X Y : C) :=
HasLimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_product CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryProduct
abbrev HasBinaryCoproduct (X Y : C) :=
HasColimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.has_binary_coproduct CategoryTheory.Limits.HasBinaryCoproduct
abbrev prod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :=
limit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prod
abbrev coprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :=
colimit (pair X Y)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod
notation:20 X " ⨯ " Y:20 => prod X Y
notation:20 X " ⨿ " Y:20 => coprod X Y
abbrev prod.fst {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.fst
abbrev prod.snd {X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] : X ⨯ Y ⟶ Y :=
limit.π (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.snd
abbrev coprod.inl {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl
abbrev coprod.inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y :=
colimit.ι (pair X Y) ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr
def prodIsProd (X Y : C) [HasBinaryProduct X Y] :
IsLimit (BinaryFan.mk (prod.fst : X ⨯ Y ⟶ X) prod.snd) :=
(limit.isLimit _).ofIsoLimit (Cones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
· dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]; rfl
))
#align category_theory.limits.prod_is_prod CategoryTheory.Limits.prodIsProd
def coprodIsCoprod (X Y : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) coprod.inr) :=
(colimit.isColimit _).ofIsoColimit (Cocones.ext (Iso.refl _) (fun ⟨u⟩ => by
cases u
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
· dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
))
#align category_theory.limits.coprod_is_coprod CategoryTheory.Limits.coprodIsCoprod
@[ext 1100]
theorem prod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] {f g : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y}
(h₁ : f ≫ prod.fst = g ≫ prod.fst) (h₂ : f ≫ prod.snd = g ≫ prod.snd) : f = g :=
BinaryFan.IsLimit.hom_ext (limit.isLimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.prod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.hom_ext
@[ext 1100]
theorem coprod.hom_ext {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] {f g : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W}
(h₁ : coprod.inl ≫ f = coprod.inl ≫ g) (h₂ : coprod.inr ≫ f = coprod.inr ≫ g) : f = g :=
BinaryCofan.IsColimit.hom_ext (colimit.isColimit _) h₁ h₂
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.hom_ext
abbrev prod.lift {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y :=
limit.lift _ (BinaryFan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift
abbrev diag (X : C) [HasBinaryProduct X X] : X ⟶ X ⨯ X :=
prod.lift (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.diag CategoryTheory.Limits.diag
abbrev coprod.desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W :=
colimit.desc _ (BinaryCofan.mk f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc
abbrev codiag (X : C) [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] : X ⨿ X ⟶ X :=
coprod.desc (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _)
#align category_theory.limits.codiag CategoryTheory.Limits.codiag
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_fst {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.fst = f :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_fst_assoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp removes as simp can prove this
@[reassoc]
theorem prod.lift_snd {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift f g ≫ prod.snd = g :=
limit.lift_π _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift_snd_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inl_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inl ≫ coprod.desc f g = f :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_desc_assoc
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
-- Porting note: it can also prove the og version
@[reassoc]
theorem coprod.inr_desc {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
coprod.inr ≫ coprod.desc f g = g :=
colimit.ι_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_desc_assoc
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono f] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_left
instance prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y)
[Mono g] : Mono (prod.lift f g) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_snd _ _
#align category_theory.limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.mono_lift_of_mono_right
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi f] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inl_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_left
instance coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W)
[Epi g] : Epi (coprod.desc f g) :=
epi_of_epi_fac <| coprod.inr_desc _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.epi_desc_of_epi_right
def prod.lift' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryProduct X Y] (f : W ⟶ X) (g : W ⟶ Y) :
{ l : W ⟶ X ⨯ Y // l ≫ prod.fst = f ∧ l ≫ prod.snd = g } :=
⟨prod.lift f g, prod.lift_fst _ _, prod.lift_snd _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.prod.lift' CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.lift'
def coprod.desc' {W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : X ⟶ W) (g : Y ⟶ W) :
{ l : X ⨿ Y ⟶ W // coprod.inl ≫ l = f ∧ coprod.inr ≫ l = g } :=
⟨coprod.desc f g, coprod.inl_desc _ _, coprod.inr_desc _ _⟩
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc' CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc'
def prod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryProduct W X] [HasBinaryProduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Z) :
W ⨯ X ⟶ Y ⨯ Z :=
limMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.prod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.prod.map
def coprod.map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : W ⨿ X ⟶ Y ⨿ Z :=
colimMap (mapPair f g)
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map
section CoprodLemmas
-- @[reassoc (attr := simp)]
@[simp] -- Porting note: removing reassoc tag since result is not hygienic (two h's)
theorem coprod.desc_comp {V W X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V)
(h : Y ⟶ V) : coprod.desc g h ≫ f = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp
-- Porting note: hand generated reassoc here. Simp can prove it
theorem coprod.desc_comp_assoc {C : Type u} [Category C] {V W X Y : C}
[HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] (f : V ⟶ W) (g : X ⟶ V) (h : Y ⟶ V) {Z : C} (l : W ⟶ Z) :
coprod.desc g h ≫ f ≫ l = coprod.desc (g ≫ f) (h ≫ f) ≫ l := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp
theorem coprod.diag_comp {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X X] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
codiag X ≫ f = coprod.desc f f := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.diag_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.diag_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.inl_map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inl ≫ coprod.map f g = f ≫ coprod.inl :=
ι_colimMap _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inl_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inl_map_assoc
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.inr_map {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W X] [HasBinaryCoproduct Y Z] (f : W ⟶ Y)
(g : X ⟶ Z) : coprod.inr ≫ coprod.map f g = g ≫ coprod.inr :=
ι_colimMap _ _
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.inr_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.inr_map_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coprod.map_id_id {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] : coprod.map (𝟙 X) (𝟙 Y) = 𝟙 _ := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_id_id CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_id_id
@[simp]
theorem coprod.desc_inl_inr {X Y : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct X Y] :
coprod.desc coprod.inl coprod.inr = 𝟙 (X ⨿ Y) := by ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_inl_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_inl_inr
-- The simp linter says simp can prove the reassoc version of this lemma.
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem coprod.map_desc {S T U V W : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct U W] [HasBinaryCoproduct T V]
(f : U ⟶ S) (g : W ⟶ S) (h : T ⟶ U) (k : V ⟶ W) :
coprod.map h k ≫ coprod.desc f g = coprod.desc (h ≫ f) (k ≫ g) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_desc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_desc
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_desc_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_desc_assoc
@[simp]
theorem coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr {W X Y Z : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct W Y]
[HasBinaryCoproduct X Z] (g : W ⟶ X) (g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
coprod.desc (g ≫ coprod.inl) (g' ≫ coprod.inr) = coprod.map g g' := by
rw [← coprod.map_desc]; simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.desc_comp_inl_comp_inr
-- We take the right hand side here to be simp normal form, as this way composition lemmas for
-- `f ≫ h` and `g ≫ k` can fire (eg `id_comp`) , while `inl_map` and `inr_map` can still work just
-- as well.
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem coprod.map_map {A₁ A₂ A₃ B₁ B₂ B₃ : C} [HasBinaryCoproduct A₁ B₁] [HasBinaryCoproduct A₂ B₂]
[HasBinaryCoproduct A₃ B₃] (f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (g : B₁ ⟶ B₂) (h : A₂ ⟶ A₃) (k : B₂ ⟶ B₃) :
coprod.map f g ≫ coprod.map h k = coprod.map (f ≫ h) (g ≫ k) := by
ext <;> simp
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_map CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_map
#align category_theory.limits.coprod.map_map_assoc CategoryTheory.Limits.coprod.map_map_assoc
-- I don't think it's a good idea to make any of the following three simp lemmas.
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/BinaryProducts.lean | 905 | 907 | theorem coprod.map_swap {A B X Y : C} (f : A ⟶ B) (g : X ⟶ Y)
[HasColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) C] :
coprod.map (𝟙 X) f ≫ coprod.map g (𝟙 B) = coprod.map g (𝟙 A) ≫ coprod.map (𝟙 Y) f := by | simp
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Projections
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorCategories
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Idempotents.FunctorExtension
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.p_infty from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Preadditive
CategoryTheory.SimplicialObject CategoryTheory.Idempotents Opposite Simplicial DoldKan
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] {X : SimplicialObject C}
theorem P_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((P (q + 1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) = (P q).f n := by
rcases n with (_|n)
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, P_f_0_eq]
· simp only [P_succ, add_right_eq_self, comp_add, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply, comp_id]
exact (HigherFacesVanish.of_P q n).comp_Hσ_eq_zero (Nat.succ_le_iff.mp hqn)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_is_eventually_constant AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.P_is_eventually_constant
theorem Q_is_eventually_constant {q n : ℕ} (hqn : n ≤ q) :
((Q (q + 1)).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _) = (Q q).f n := by
simp only [Q, HomologicalComplex.sub_f_apply, P_is_eventually_constant hqn]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Q_is_eventually_constant AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Q_is_eventually_constant
noncomputable def PInfty : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
ChainComplex.ofHom _ _ _ _ _ _ (fun n => ((P n).f n : X _[n] ⟶ _)) fun n => by
simpa only [← P_is_eventually_constant (show n ≤ n by rfl),
AlternatingFaceMapComplex.obj_d_eq] using (P (n + 1) : K[X] ⟶ _).comm (n + 1) n
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty
noncomputable def QInfty : K[X] ⟶ K[X] :=
𝟙 _ - PInfty
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Q_infty AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.QInfty
@[simp]
theorem PInfty_f_0 : (PInfty.f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 𝟙 _ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_f_0 AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty_f_0
theorem PInfty_f (n : ℕ) : (PInfty.f n : X _[n] ⟶ X _[n]) = (P n).f n :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.P_infty_f AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty_f
@[simp]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/PInfty.lean | 78 | 80 | theorem QInfty_f_0 : (QInfty.f 0 : X _[0] ⟶ X _[0]) = 0 := by |
dsimp [QInfty]
simp only [sub_self]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.AbsoluteValue
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Units
#align_import data.int.absolute_value from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9aba7801eeecebb61f58a5763c2b6dd1b47dc6ef"
variable {R S : Type*} [Ring R] [LinearOrderedCommRing S]
@[simp]
theorem AbsoluteValue.map_units_int (abv : AbsoluteValue ℤ S) (x : ℤˣ) : abv x = 1 := by
rcases Int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
#align absolute_value.map_units_int AbsoluteValue.map_units_int
@[simp]
theorem AbsoluteValue.map_units_intCast [Nontrivial R] (abv : AbsoluteValue R S) (x : ℤˣ) :
abv ((x : ℤ) : R) = 1 := by rcases Int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
#align absolute_value.map_units_int_cast AbsoluteValue.map_units_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias AbsoluteValue.map_units_int_cast := AbsoluteValue.map_units_intCast
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/AbsoluteValue.lean | 41 | 42 | theorem AbsoluteValue.map_units_int_smul (abv : AbsoluteValue R S) (x : ℤˣ) (y : R) :
abv (x • y) = abv y := by | rcases Int.units_eq_one_or x with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Bounds
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Disjoint
#align_import data.real.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cb42593171ba005beaaf4549fcfe0dece9ada4c9"
open scoped Classical
open Pointwise CauSeq
namespace Real
instance instArchimedean : Archimedean ℝ :=
archimedean_iff_rat_le.2 fun x =>
Real.ind_mk x fun f =>
let ⟨M, _, H⟩ := f.bounded' 0
⟨M, mk_le_of_forall_le ⟨0, fun i _ => Rat.cast_le.2 <| le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 (H i)).2⟩⟩
#align real.archimedean Real.instArchimedean
noncomputable instance : FloorRing ℝ :=
Archimedean.floorRing _
theorem isCauSeq_iff_lift {f : ℕ → ℚ} : IsCauSeq abs f ↔ IsCauSeq abs fun i => (f i : ℝ) where
mp H ε ε0 :=
let ⟨δ, δ0, δε⟩ := exists_pos_rat_lt ε0
(H _ δ0).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp; exact lt_trans (mod_cast hi _ ij) δε
mpr H ε ε0 :=
(H _ (Rat.cast_pos.2 ε0)).imp fun i hi j ij => by dsimp at hi; exact mod_cast hi _ ij
#align real.is_cau_seq_iff_lift Real.isCauSeq_iff_lift
theorem of_near (f : ℕ → ℚ) (x : ℝ) (h : ∀ ε > 0, ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| < ε) :
∃ h', Real.mk ⟨f, h'⟩ = x :=
⟨isCauSeq_iff_lift.2 (CauSeq.of_near _ (const abs x) h),
sub_eq_zero.1 <|
abs_eq_zero.1 <|
(eq_of_le_of_forall_le_of_dense (abs_nonneg _)) fun _ε ε0 =>
mk_near_of_forall_near <| (h _ ε0).imp fun _i h j ij => le_of_lt (h j ij)⟩
#align real.of_near Real.of_near
theorem exists_floor (x : ℝ) : ∃ ub : ℤ, (ub : ℝ) ≤ x ∧ ∀ z : ℤ, (z : ℝ) ≤ x → z ≤ ub :=
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_gt x
⟨n, fun _ h' => Int.cast_le.1 <| le_trans h' <| le_of_lt hn⟩)
(let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_int_lt x
⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩)
#align real.exists_floor Real.exists_floor
theorem exists_isLUB {S : Set ℝ} (hne : S.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddAbove S) : ∃ x, IsLUB S x := by
rcases hne, hbdd with ⟨⟨L, hL⟩, ⟨U, hU⟩⟩
have : ∀ d : ℕ, BddAbove { m : ℤ | ∃ y ∈ S, (m : ℝ) ≤ y * d } := by
cases' exists_int_gt U with k hk
refine fun d => ⟨k * d, fun z h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine Int.cast_le.1 (hy.trans ?_)
push_cast
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ((hU yS).trans hk.le) d.cast_nonneg
choose f hf using fun d : ℕ =>
Int.exists_greatest_of_bdd (this d) ⟨⌊L * d⌋, L, hL, Int.floor_le _⟩
have hf₁ : ∀ n > 0, ∃ y ∈ S, ((f n / n : ℚ) : ℝ) ≤ y := fun n n0 =>
let ⟨y, yS, hy⟩ := (hf n).1
⟨y, yS, by simpa using (div_le_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _)).2 hy⟩
have hf₂ : ∀ n > 0, ∀ y ∈ S, (y - ((n : ℕ) : ℝ)⁻¹) < (f n / n : ℚ) := by
intro n n0 y yS
have := (Int.sub_one_lt_floor _).trans_le (Int.cast_le.2 <| (hf n).2 _ ⟨y, yS, Int.floor_le _⟩)
simp only [Rat.cast_div, Rat.cast_intCast, Rat.cast_natCast, gt_iff_lt]
rwa [lt_div_iff (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _), sub_mul, _root_.inv_mul_cancel]
exact ne_of_gt (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0)
have hg : IsCauSeq abs (fun n => f n / n : ℕ → ℚ) := by
intro ε ε0
suffices ∀ j ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, ∀ k ≥ ⌈ε⁻¹⌉₊, (f j / j - f k / k : ℚ) < ε by
refine ⟨_, fun j ij => abs_lt.2 ⟨?_, this _ ij _ le_rfl⟩⟩
rw [neg_lt, neg_sub]
exact this _ le_rfl _ ij
intro j ij k ik
replace ij := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ij)
replace ik := le_trans (Nat.le_ceil _) (Nat.cast_le.2 ik)
have j0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ij)
have k0 := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 ε0).trans_le ik)
rcases hf₁ _ j0 with ⟨y, yS, hy⟩
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((Rat.cast_lt (K := ℝ)).1 ?_) ((inv_le ε0 (Nat.cast_pos.2 k0)).1 ik)
simpa using sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 (lt_of_le_of_lt hy <| sub_lt_iff_lt_add.1 <| hf₂ _ k0 _ yS)
let g : CauSeq ℚ abs := ⟨fun n => f n / n, hg⟩
refine ⟨mk g, ⟨fun x xS => ?_, fun y h => ?_⟩⟩
· refine le_of_forall_ge_of_dense fun z xz => ?_
cases' exists_nat_gt (x - z)⁻¹ with K hK
refine le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨K, fun n nK => ?_⟩
replace xz := sub_pos.2 xz
replace hK := hK.le.trans (Nat.cast_le.2 nK)
have n0 : 0 < n := Nat.cast_pos.1 ((inv_pos.2 xz).trans_le hK)
refine le_trans ?_ (hf₂ _ n0 _ xS).le
rwa [le_sub_comm, inv_le (Nat.cast_pos.2 n0 : (_ : ℝ) < _) xz]
· exact
mk_le_of_forall_le
⟨1, fun n n1 =>
let ⟨x, xS, hx⟩ := hf₁ _ n1
le_trans hx (h xS)⟩
#align real.exists_is_lub Real.exists_isLUB
theorem exists_isGLB {S : Set ℝ} (hne : S.Nonempty) (hbdd : BddBelow S) : ∃ x, IsGLB S x := by
have hne' : (-S).Nonempty := Set.nonempty_neg.mpr hne
have hbdd' : BddAbove (-S) := bddAbove_neg.mpr hbdd
use -Classical.choose (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
rw [← isLUB_neg]
exact Classical.choose_spec (Real.exists_isLUB hne' hbdd')
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℝ :=
⟨fun S => if h : S.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove S then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0⟩
theorem sSup_def (S : Set ℝ) :
sSup S = if h : S.Nonempty ∧ BddAbove S then Classical.choose (exists_isLUB h.1 h.2) else 0 :=
rfl
#align real.Sup_def Real.sSup_def
protected theorem isLUB_sSup (S : Set ℝ) (h₁ : S.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddAbove S) :
IsLUB S (sSup S) := by
simp only [sSup_def, dif_pos (And.intro h₁ h₂)]
apply Classical.choose_spec
#align real.is_lub_Sup Real.isLUB_sSup
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℝ :=
⟨fun S => -sSup (-S)⟩
theorem sInf_def (S : Set ℝ) : sInf S = -sSup (-S) :=
rfl
#align real.Inf_def Real.sInf_def
protected theorem is_glb_sInf (S : Set ℝ) (h₁ : S.Nonempty) (h₂ : BddBelow S) :
IsGLB S (sInf S) := by
rw [sInf_def, ← isLUB_neg', neg_neg]
exact Real.isLUB_sSup _ h₁.neg h₂.neg
#align real.is_glb_Inf Real.is_glb_sInf
noncomputable instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder ℝ :=
{ Real.linearOrder, Real.lattice with
sSup := SupSet.sSup
sInf := InfSet.sInf
le_csSup := fun s a hs ha => (Real.isLUB_sSup s ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
csSup_le := fun s a hs ha => (Real.isLUB_sSup s hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csInf_le := fun s a hs ha => (Real.is_glb_sInf s ⟨a, ha⟩ hs).1 ha
le_csInf := fun s a hs ha => (Real.is_glb_sInf s hs ⟨a, ha⟩).2 ha
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs, sSup_def]
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s hs ↦ by simp [hs, sInf_def, sSup_def] }
theorem lt_sInf_add_pos {s : Set ℝ} (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ a ∈ s, a < sInf s + ε :=
exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
#align real.lt_Inf_add_pos Real.lt_sInf_add_pos
theorem add_neg_lt_sSup {s : Set ℝ} (h : s.Nonempty) {ε : ℝ} (hε : ε < 0) :
∃ a ∈ s, sSup s + ε < a :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h <| add_lt_iff_neg_left.2 hε
#align real.add_neg_lt_Sup Real.add_neg_lt_sSup
theorem sInf_le_iff {s : Set ℝ} (h : BddBelow s) (h' : s.Nonempty) {a : ℝ} :
sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x ∈ s, x < a + ε := by
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
constructor <;> intro H ε ε_pos
· exact exists_lt_of_csInf_lt h' (H ε ε_pos)
· rcases H ε ε_pos with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact csInf_lt_of_lt h x_in hx
#align real.Inf_le_iff Real.sInf_le_iff
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean | 174 | 180 | theorem le_sSup_iff {s : Set ℝ} (h : BddAbove s) (h' : s.Nonempty) {a : ℝ} :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ ε, ε < 0 → ∃ x ∈ s, a + ε < x := by |
rw [le_iff_forall_pos_lt_add]
refine ⟨fun H ε ε_neg => ?_, fun H ε ε_pos => ?_⟩
· exact exists_lt_of_lt_csSup h' (lt_sub_iff_add_lt.mp (H _ (neg_pos.mpr ε_neg)))
· rcases H _ (neg_lt_zero.mpr ε_pos) with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
exact sub_lt_iff_lt_add.mp (lt_csSup_of_lt h x_in hx)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
#align_import algebra.star.pointwise from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"30413fc89f202a090a54d78e540963ed3de0056e"
namespace Set
open Pointwise
local postfix:max "⋆" => star
variable {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} {a : α}
protected def star [Star α] : Star (Set α) := ⟨preimage Star.star⟩
#align set.has_star Set.star
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.star
@[simp]
theorem star_empty [Star α] : (∅ : Set α)⋆ = ∅ := rfl
#align set.star_empty Set.star_empty
@[simp]
theorem star_univ [Star α] : (univ : Set α)⋆ = univ := rfl
#align set.star_univ Set.star_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_star [InvolutiveStar α] {s : Set α} : s⋆.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
star_involutive.surjective.nonempty_preimage
#align set.nonempty_star Set.nonempty_star
theorem Nonempty.star [InvolutiveStar α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s⋆.Nonempty :=
nonempty_star.2 h
#align set.nonempty.star Set.Nonempty.star
@[simp]
theorem mem_star [Star α] : a ∈ s⋆ ↔ a⋆ ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_star Set.mem_star
theorem star_mem_star [InvolutiveStar α] : a⋆ ∈ s⋆ ↔ a ∈ s := by simp only [mem_star, star_star]
#align set.star_mem_star Set.star_mem_star
@[simp]
theorem star_preimage [Star α] : Star.star ⁻¹' s = s⋆ := rfl
#align set.star_preimage Set.star_preimage
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/Pointwise.lean | 70 | 72 | theorem image_star [InvolutiveStar α] : Star.star '' s = s⋆ := by |
simp only [← star_preimage]
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse] <;> intro <;> simp only [star_star]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.strict from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84dc0bd6619acaea625086d6f53cb35cdd554219"
open Set
open Convex Pointwise
variable {𝕜 𝕝 E F β : Type*}
open Function Set
open Convex
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
section AddCommMonoid
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [AddCommMonoid F]
section SMul
variable (𝕜)
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] [SMul 𝕜 F] (s : Set E)
def StrictConvex : Prop :=
s.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ ⦃a b : 𝕜⦄, 0 < a → 0 < b → a + b = 1 → a • x + b • y ∈ interior s
#align strict_convex StrictConvex
variable {𝕜 s}
variable {x y : E} {a b : 𝕜}
theorem strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset :
StrictConvex 𝕜 s ↔ s.Pairwise fun x y => openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => (openSegment_subset_iff 𝕜).symm
#align strict_convex_iff_open_segment_subset strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset
theorem StrictConvex.openSegment_subset (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(h : x ≠ y) : openSegment 𝕜 x y ⊆ interior s :=
strictConvex_iff_openSegment_subset.1 hs hx hy h
#align strict_convex.open_segment_subset StrictConvex.openSegment_subset
theorem strictConvex_empty : StrictConvex 𝕜 (∅ : Set E) :=
pairwise_empty _
#align strict_convex_empty strictConvex_empty
theorem strictConvex_univ : StrictConvex 𝕜 (univ : Set E) := by
intro x _ y _ _ a b _ _ _
rw [interior_univ]
exact mem_univ _
#align strict_convex_univ strictConvex_univ
protected nonrec theorem StrictConvex.eq (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (hx : x ∈ s) (hy : y ∈ s)
(ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hab : a + b = 1) (h : a • x + b • y ∉ interior s) : x = y :=
hs.eq hx hy fun H => h <| H ha hb hab
#align strict_convex.eq StrictConvex.eq
protected theorem StrictConvex.inter {t : Set E} (hs : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) (ht : StrictConvex 𝕜 t) :
StrictConvex 𝕜 (s ∩ t) := by
intro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [interior_inter]
exact ⟨hs hx.1 hy.1 hxy ha hb hab, ht hx.2 hy.2 hxy ha hb hab⟩
#align strict_convex.inter StrictConvex.inter
theorem Directed.strictConvex_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set E} (hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(hs : ∀ ⦃i : ι⦄, StrictConvex 𝕜 (s i)) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃ i, s i) := by
rintro x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab
rw [mem_iUnion] at hx hy
obtain ⟨i, hx⟩ := hx
obtain ⟨j, hy⟩ := hy
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hdir i j
exact interior_mono (subset_iUnion s k) (hs (hik hx) (hjk hy) hxy ha hb hab)
#align directed.strict_convex_Union Directed.strictConvex_iUnion
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strict.lean | 95 | 98 | theorem DirectedOn.strictConvex_sUnion {S : Set (Set E)} (hdir : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) S)
(hS : ∀ s ∈ S, StrictConvex 𝕜 s) : StrictConvex 𝕜 (⋃₀ S) := by |
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact (directedOn_iff_directed.1 hdir).strictConvex_iUnion fun s => hS _ s.2
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.Stopping
#align_import probability.martingale.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ba074af83b6cf54c3104e59402b39410ddbd6dca"
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω E ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E] {f g : ι → Ω → E} {ℱ : Filtration ι m0}
def Martingale (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ ∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i
#align measure_theory.martingale MeasureTheory.Martingale
def Supermartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → μ[f j|ℱ i] ≤ᵐ[μ] f i) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.supermartingale MeasureTheory.Supermartingale
def Submartingale [LE E] (f : ι → Ω → E) (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Prop :=
Adapted ℱ f ∧ (∀ i j, i ≤ j → f i ≤ᵐ[μ] μ[f j|ℱ i]) ∧ ∀ i, Integrable (f i) μ
#align measure_theory.submartingale MeasureTheory.Submartingale
theorem martingale_const (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (x : E) :
Martingale (fun _ _ => x) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_const ℱ _, fun i j _ => by rw [condexp_const (ℱ.le _)]⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_const MeasureTheory.martingale_const
theorem martingale_const_fun [OrderBot ι] (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{f : Ω → E} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[ℱ ⊥] f) (hfint : Integrable f μ) :
Martingale (fun _ => f) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨fun i => hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le, fun i j _ => ?_⟩
rw [condexp_of_stronglyMeasurable (ℱ.le _) (hf.mono <| ℱ.mono bot_le) hfint]
#align measure_theory.martingale_const_fun MeasureTheory.martingale_const_fun
variable (E)
theorem martingale_zero (ℱ : Filtration ι m0) (μ : Measure Ω) : Martingale (0 : ι → Ω → E) ℱ μ :=
⟨adapted_zero E ℱ, fun i j _ => by rw [Pi.zero_apply, condexp_zero]; simp⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale_zero MeasureTheory.martingale_zero
variable {E}
namespace Martingale
protected theorem adapted (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Adapted ℱ f :=
hf.1
#align measure_theory.martingale.adapted MeasureTheory.Martingale.adapted
protected theorem stronglyMeasurable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) :
StronglyMeasurable[ℱ i] (f i) :=
hf.adapted i
#align measure_theory.martingale.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Martingale.stronglyMeasurable
theorem condexp_ae_eq (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j) : μ[f j|ℱ i] =ᵐ[μ] f i :=
hf.2 i j hij
#align measure_theory.martingale.condexp_ae_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.condexp_ae_eq
protected theorem integrable (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (i : ι) : Integrable (f i) μ :=
integrable_condexp.congr (hf.condexp_ae_eq (le_refl i))
#align measure_theory.martingale.integrable MeasureTheory.Martingale.integrable
theorem setIntegral_eq [SigmaFiniteFiltration μ ℱ] (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) {i j : ι} (hij : i ≤ j)
{s : Set Ω} (hs : MeasurableSet[ℱ i] s) : ∫ ω in s, f i ω ∂μ = ∫ ω in s, f j ω ∂μ := by
rw [← @setIntegral_condexp _ _ _ _ _ (ℱ i) m0 _ _ _ (ℱ.le i) _ (hf.integrable j) hs]
refine setIntegral_congr_ae (ℱ.le i s hs) ?_
filter_upwards [hf.2 i j hij] with _ heq _ using heq.symm
#align measure_theory.martingale.set_integral_eq MeasureTheory.Martingale.setIntegral_eq
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_eq := setIntegral_eq
theorem add (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f + g) ℱ μ := by
refine ⟨hf.adapted.add hg.adapted, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
exact (condexp_add (hf.integrable j) (hg.integrable j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).add (hg.2 i j hij))
#align measure_theory.martingale.add MeasureTheory.Martingale.add
theorem neg (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (-f) ℱ μ :=
⟨hf.adapted.neg, fun i j hij => (condexp_neg (f j)).trans (hf.2 i j hij).neg⟩
#align measure_theory.martingale.neg MeasureTheory.Martingale.neg
theorem sub (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) (hg : Martingale g ℱ μ) : Martingale (f - g) ℱ μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]; exact hf.add hg.neg
#align measure_theory.martingale.sub MeasureTheory.Martingale.sub
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Basic.lean | 132 | 135 | theorem smul (c : ℝ) (hf : Martingale f ℱ μ) : Martingale (c • f) ℱ μ := by |
refine ⟨hf.adapted.smul c, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
refine (condexp_smul c (f j)).trans ((hf.2 i j hij).mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Opposite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Opposite
#align_import ring_theory.non_zero_divisors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1126441d6bccf98c81214a0780c73d499f6721fe"
variable (M₀ : Type*) [MonoidWithZero M₀]
def nonZeroDivisorsLeft : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' {x} {y} hx hy := fun z hz ↦ hx _ <| hy _ (mul_assoc z x y ▸ hz)
@[simp] lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff {x : M₀} :
x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ ∀ y, y * x = 0 → y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff {r : M₀} :
r ∉ nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ ↔ {s | s * r = 0 ∧ s ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
def nonZeroDivisorsRight : Submonoid M₀ where
carrier := {x | ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0}
one_mem' := by simp
mul_mem' := fun {x} {y} hx hy z hz ↦ hy _ (hx _ ((mul_assoc x y z).symm ▸ hz))
@[simp] lemma mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff {x : M₀} :
x ∈ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ ∀ y, x * y = 0 → y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff {r : M₀} :
r ∉ nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ ↔ {s | r * s = 0 ∧ s ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
lemma nonZeroDivisorsLeft_eq_right (M₀ : Type*) [CommMonoidWithZero M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ = nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ := by
ext x; simp [mul_comm x]
@[simp] lemma coe_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_eq [NoZeroDivisors M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsLeft M₀ = {x : M₀ | x ≠ 0} := by
ext x
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonZeroDivisorsLeft_iff, mul_eq_zero, forall_eq_or_imp, true_and,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hx y hx' ↦ by contradiction⟩
contrapose! h
exact ⟨1, h, one_ne_zero⟩
@[simp] lemma coe_nonZeroDivisorsRight_eq [NoZeroDivisors M₀] [Nontrivial M₀] :
nonZeroDivisorsRight M₀ = {x : M₀ | x ≠ 0} := by
ext x
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_nonZeroDivisorsRight_iff, mul_eq_zero, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun hx y hx' ↦ by aesop⟩
contrapose! h
exact ⟨1, Or.inl h, one_ne_zero⟩
def nonZeroDivisors (R : Type*) [MonoidWithZero R] : Submonoid R where
carrier := { x | ∀ z, z * x = 0 → z = 0 }
one_mem' _ hz := by rwa [mul_one] at hz
mul_mem' hx₁ hx₂ _ hz := by
rw [← mul_assoc] at hz
exact hx₁ _ (hx₂ _ hz)
#align non_zero_divisors nonZeroDivisors
scoped[nonZeroDivisors] notation:9000 R "⁰" => nonZeroDivisors R
def nonZeroSMulDivisors (R : Type*) [MonoidWithZero R] (M : Type _) [Zero M] [MulAction R M] :
Submonoid R where
carrier := { r | ∀ m : M, r • m = 0 → m = 0}
one_mem' m h := (one_smul R m) ▸ h
mul_mem' {r₁ r₂} h₁ h₂ m H := h₂ _ <| h₁ _ <| mul_smul r₁ r₂ m ▸ H
scoped[nonZeroSMulDivisors] notation:9000 R "⁰[" M "]" => nonZeroSMulDivisors R M
section nonZeroDivisors
open nonZeroDivisors
variable {M M' M₁ R R' F : Type*} [MonoidWithZero M] [MonoidWithZero M'] [CommMonoidWithZero M₁]
[Ring R] [CommRing R']
theorem mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff {r : M} : r ∈ M⁰ ↔ ∀ x, x * r = 0 → x = 0 := Iff.rfl
#align mem_non_zero_divisors_iff mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff
lemma nmem_nonZeroDivisors_iff {r : M} : r ∉ M⁰ ↔ {s | s * r = 0 ∧ s ≠ 0}.Nonempty := by
simpa [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff] using Set.nonempty_def.symm
theorem mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff {x r : M} (hr : r ∈ M⁰) : x * r = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨hr _, by simp (config := { contextual := true })⟩
#align mul_right_mem_non_zero_divisors_eq_zero_iff mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_coe_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff {x : M} {c : M⁰} : x * c = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff c.prop
#align mul_right_coe_non_zero_divisors_eq_zero_iff mul_right_coe_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
theorem mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff {r x : M₁} (hr : r ∈ M₁⁰) : r * x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hr]
#align mul_left_mem_non_zero_divisors_eq_zero_iff mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff {c : M₁⁰} {x : M₁} : (c : M₁) * x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
mul_left_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff c.prop
#align mul_left_coe_non_zero_divisors_eq_zero_iff mul_left_coe_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/NonZeroDivisors.lean | 138 | 140 | theorem mul_cancel_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors {x y r : R} (hr : r ∈ R⁰) : x * r = y * r ↔ x = y := by |
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, congrArg (· * r)⟩
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hr, sub_mul, h, sub_self]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Core
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4b05d3f4f0601dca8abf99c4ec99187682ed0bba"
open Polynomial Algebra FiniteDimensional Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
#align is_cyclotomic_extension IsCyclotomicExtension
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_adjoin_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_adjoin_eq_top
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_singleton IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_singleton
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.empty IsCyclotomicExtension.empty
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one
variable {A B}
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
-- Porting note: Lean3 is able to infer `A`.
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top
variable (A B)
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· cases' hn with hn hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy) fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← AlgHom.map_pow, hn.2, AlgHom.map_one]⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.trans IsCyclotomicExtension.trans
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
-- Porting note: `R := A` was not needed.
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.subsingleton_iff IsCyclotomicExtension.subsingleton_iff
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_right IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_left IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left
variable {n S}
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.of_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.of_union_of_dvd
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_of_dvd
variable (n S)
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_singleton_one
variable {A B}
theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top
theorem singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B :=
singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (surjective_algebraMap_iff.1 h).symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one_of_algebra_map_bijective IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective
variable (A B)
protected
theorem equiv {C : Type*} [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B]
(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) : IsCyclotomicExtension S A C := by
letI : Algebra B C := f.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} B C := singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective f.surjective
haveI : IsScalarTower A B C := IsScalarTower.of_algHom f.toAlgHom
exact (iff_union_singleton_one _ _ _).2 (trans S {1} A B C f.injective)
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.equiv IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv
protected
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 291 | 293 | theorem neZero [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B] [IsDomain B] : NeZero ((n : ℕ) : B) := by |
obtain ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, -⟩ := (iff_singleton n A B).1 h
exact hr.neZero'
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Basic
open Filter Set
open scoped ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α] {μ : F} {s t : Set α}
def ae (μ : F) : Filter α :=
.ofCountableUnion (μ · = 0) (fun _S hSc ↦ (measure_sUnion_null_iff hSc).2) fun _t ht _s hs ↦
measure_mono_null hs ht
#align measure_theory.measure.ae MeasureTheory.ae
notation3 "∀ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
notation3 "∃ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped P => Filter.Frequently P <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
notation:50 f " =ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyEq (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
notation:50 f " ≤ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyLE (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
theorem mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ae_iff MeasureTheory.mem_ae_iff
theorem ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | ¬p a } = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_iff MeasureTheory.ae_iff
theorem compl_mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ ∈ ae μ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
#align measure_theory.compl_mem_ae_iff MeasureTheory.compl_mem_ae_iff
theorem frequently_ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | p a } ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
#align measure_theory.frequently_ae_iff MeasureTheory.frequently_ae_iff
theorem frequently_ae_mem_iff {s : Set α} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s) ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
#align measure_theory.frequently_ae_mem_iff MeasureTheory.frequently_ae_mem_iff
theorem measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem {s : Set α} : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∉ s :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.symm
#align measure_theory.measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem MeasureTheory.measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem
theorem ae_of_all {p : α → Prop} (μ : F) : (∀ a, p a) → ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a :=
eventually_of_forall
#align measure_theory.ae_of_all MeasureTheory.ae_of_all
instance instCountableInterFilter : CountableInterFilter (ae μ) := by
unfold ae; infer_instance
#align measure_theory.measure.ae.countable_Inter_filter MeasureTheory.instCountableInterFilter
theorem ae_all_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i :=
eventually_countable_forall
#align measure_theory.ae_all_iff MeasureTheory.ae_all_iff
theorem all_ae_of {ι : Sort*} {p : α → ι → Prop} (hp : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) (i : ι) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i := by
filter_upwards [hp] with a ha using ha i
lemma ae_iff_of_countable [Countable α] {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ↔ ∀ x, μ {x} ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, measure_null_iff_singleton]
exacts [forall_congr' fun _ ↦ not_imp_comm, Set.to_countable _]
theorem ae_ball_iff {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {p : α → ∀ i ∈ S, Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), p x i hi) ↔ ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x i hi :=
eventually_countable_ball hS
#align measure_theory.ae_ball_iff MeasureTheory.ae_ball_iff
theorem ae_eq_refl (f : α → β) : f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_refl MeasureTheory.ae_eq_refl
theorem ae_eq_symm {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : g =ᵐ[μ] f :=
h.symm
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_symm MeasureTheory.ae_eq_symm
theorem ae_eq_trans {f g h : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (h₂ : g =ᵐ[μ] h) : f =ᵐ[μ] h :=
h₁.trans h₂
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trans MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trans
theorem ae_le_of_ae_lt {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt
#align measure_theory.ae_le_of_ae_lt MeasureTheory.ae_le_of_ae_lt
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_empty : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_empty.trans <| by simp only [ae_iff, Classical.not_not, setOf_mem_eq]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_empty MeasureTheory.ae_eq_empty
-- Porting note: The priority should be higher than `eventuallyEq_univ`.
@[simp high]
theorem ae_eq_univ : s =ᵐ[μ] (univ : Set α) ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_univ
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_univ MeasureTheory.ae_eq_univ
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE.lean | 148 | 151 | theorem ae_le_set : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
calc
s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 := by | simp [ae_iff]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Unitization
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.NonUnitalSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
namespace NonUnitalSubalgebra
theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' {F R S A : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → algebraMap R A r ∉ s)
[FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by
refine (injective_iff_map_eq_zero f).mpr fun x hx => ?_
induction' x with r a
simp_rw [map_add, hf, ← Unitization.algebraMap_eq_inl, AlgHomClass.commutes] at hx
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at hx ⊢
by_cases hr : r = 0
· ext <;> simp [hr] at hx ⊢
exact hx
· exact (h r hr <| hx ▸ (neg_mem a.property)).elim
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Subalgebra/Unitization.lean | 161 | 167 | theorem _root_.AlgHomClass.unitization_injective {F R S A : Type*} [Field R] [Ring A]
[Algebra R A] [SetLike S A] [hSA : NonUnitalSubringClass S A] [hSRA : SMulMemClass S R A]
(s : S) (h1 : 1 ∉ s) [FunLike F (Unitization R s) A] [AlgHomClass F R (Unitization R s) A]
(f : F) (hf : ∀ x : s, f x = x) : Function.Injective f := by |
refine AlgHomClass.unitization_injective' s (fun r hr hr' ↦ ?_) f hf
rw [Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one] at hr'
exact h1 <| inv_smul_smul₀ hr (1 : A) ▸ SMulMemClass.smul_mem r⁻¹ hr'
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 457 | 458 | theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by |
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Logic
import Mathlib.Init.Function
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
#align_import logic.nontrivial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
open scoped Classical
class Nontrivial (α : Type*) : Prop where
exists_pair_ne : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y
#align nontrivial Nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
⟨fun h ↦ h.exists_pair_ne, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
#align nontrivial_iff nontrivial_iff
theorem exists_pair_ne (α : Type*) [Nontrivial α] : ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y :=
Nontrivial.exists_pair_ne
#align exists_pair_ne exists_pair_ne
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.exists_ne [Nontrivial α] [DecidableEq α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := by
rcases exists_pair_ne α with ⟨y, y', h⟩
by_cases hx:x = y
· rw [← hx] at h
exact ⟨y', h.symm⟩
· exact ⟨y, Ne.symm hx⟩
#align decidable.exists_ne Decidable.exists_ne
theorem exists_ne [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : ∃ y, y ≠ x := Decidable.exists_ne x
#align exists_ne exists_ne
-- `x` and `y` are explicit here, as they are often needed to guide typechecking of `h`.
theorem nontrivial_of_ne (x y : α) (h : x ≠ y) : Nontrivial α :=
⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
#align nontrivial_of_ne nontrivial_of_ne
theorem nontrivial_iff_exists_ne (x : α) : Nontrivial α ↔ ∃ y, y ≠ x :=
⟨fun h ↦ @exists_ne α h x, fun ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ nontrivial_of_ne _ _ hy⟩
#align nontrivial_iff_exists_ne nontrivial_iff_exists_ne
instance : Nontrivial Prop :=
⟨⟨True, False, true_ne_false⟩⟩
instance (priority := 500) Nontrivial.to_nonempty [Nontrivial α] : Nonempty α :=
let ⟨x, _⟩ := _root_.exists_pair_ne α
⟨x⟩
theorem subsingleton_iff : Subsingleton α ↔ ∀ x y : α, x = y :=
⟨by
intro h
exact Subsingleton.elim, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
#align subsingleton_iff subsingleton_iff
theorem not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton : ¬Nontrivial α ↔ Subsingleton α := by
simp only [nontrivial_iff, subsingleton_iff, not_exists, Classical.not_not]
#align not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton
theorem not_nontrivial (α) [Subsingleton α] : ¬Nontrivial α :=
fun ⟨⟨x, y, h⟩⟩ ↦ h <| Subsingleton.elim x y
#align not_nontrivial not_nontrivial
theorem not_subsingleton (α) [Nontrivial α] : ¬Subsingleton α :=
fun _ => not_nontrivial _ ‹_›
#align not_subsingleton not_subsingleton
lemma not_subsingleton_iff_nontrivial : ¬ Subsingleton α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
| Mathlib/Logic/Nontrivial/Defs.lean | 99 | 101 | theorem subsingleton_or_nontrivial (α : Type*) : Subsingleton α ∨ Nontrivial α := by |
rw [← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, or_comm]
exact Classical.em _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.ExpChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_le Polynomial.degreeLE
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_lt Polynomial.degreeLT
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_le Polynomial.mem_degreeLE
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
#align polynomial.degree_le_mono Polynomial.degreeLE_mono
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_le_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_lt Polynomial.mem_degreeLT
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
#align polynomial.degree_lt_mono Polynomial.degreeLT_mono
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_lt_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
#align polynomial.degree_lt_equiv Polynomial.degreeLTEquiv
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as simp can prove this
theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by
rw [LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Submodule.mk_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.degree_lt_equiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero Polynomial.degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero
theorem eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) (x : R) :
p.eval x = ∑ i, degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ i * x ^ (i : ℕ) := by
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum]
exact (sum_fin _ (by simp_rw [zero_mul, forall_const]) (mem_degreeLT.mp hp)).symm
#align polynomial.eval_eq_sum_degree_lt_equiv Polynomial.eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv
theorem degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE {n : ℕ} : degreeLT R (n + 1) = degreeLE R n := by
ext x
by_cases x_zero : x = 0
· simp_rw [x_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
· rw [mem_degreeLT, mem_degreeLE, ← natDegree_lt_iff_degree_lt (by rwa [ne_eq]),
← natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, Nat.lt_succ]
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span {s : Set R[X]} {p : R[X]}
(hs : s.Nonempty) (hp : p ∈ Submodule.span R s) :
∃ p' ∈ s, degree p ≤ degree p' := by
by_contra! h
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· rw [hp_zero, degree_zero] at h
rcases hs with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact not_lt_bot (h x hx)
· have : p ∈ degreeLT R (natDegree p) := by
refine (Submodule.span_le.mpr fun p' p'_mem => ?_) hp
rw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le (h p' p'_mem) degree_le_natDegree
rwa [mem_degreeLT, Nat.cast_withBot, degree_eq_natDegree hp_zero,
Nat.cast_withBot, lt_self_iff_false] at this
theorem exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ p' ∈ s, ∀ (p : R[X]), p ∈ Submodule.span R s → degree p ≤ degree p' := by
rcases Set.Finite.exists_maximal_wrt degree s s_fin hs with ⟨a, has, hmax⟩
refine ⟨a, has, fun p hp => ?_⟩
rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span hs hp with ⟨p', hp'⟩
by_cases h : degree a ≤ degree p'
· rw [← hmax p' hp'.left h] at hp'; exact hp'.right
· exact le_trans hp'.right (not_le.mp h).le
theorem span_le_degreeLE_of_finite {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLE R n := by
by_cases s_emp : s.Nonempty
· rcases exists_degree_le_of_mem_span_of_finite s_fin s_emp with ⟨p', _, hp'max⟩
exact ⟨natDegree p', fun p hp => mem_degreeLE.mpr ((hp'max _ hp).trans degree_le_natDegree)⟩
· rw [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty] at s_emp
rw [s_emp, Submodule.span_empty]
exact ⟨0, bot_le⟩
theorem span_of_finite_le_degreeLT {s : Set R[X]} (s_fin : s.Finite) :
∃ n : ℕ, Submodule.span R s ≤ degreeLT R n := by
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite s_fin with ⟨n, _⟩
exact ⟨n + 1, by rwa [degreeLT_succ_eq_degreeLE]⟩
theorem not_finite [Nontrivial R] : ¬ Module.Finite R R[X] := by
rw [Module.finite_def, Submodule.fg_def]
push_neg
intro s hs contra
rcases span_le_degreeLE_of_finite hs with ⟨n,hn⟩
have : ((X : R[X]) ^ (n + 1)) ∈ Polynomial.degreeLE R ↑n := by
rw [contra] at hn
exact hn Submodule.mem_top
rw [mem_degreeLE, degree_X_pow, Nat.cast_le, add_le_iff_nonpos_right, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at this
exact one_ne_zero this
def coeffs (p : R[X]) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image (fun n => p.coeff n) p.support
#align polynomial.frange Polynomial.coeffs
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] noncomputable alias frange := coeffs
theorem coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : R[X]) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.frange_zero Polynomial.coeffs_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias frange_zero := coeffs_zero
theorem mem_coeffs_iff {p : R[X]} {c : R} : c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
#align polynomial.mem_frange_iff Polynomial.mem_coeffs_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias mem_frange_iff := mem_coeffs_iff
theorem coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : R[X]) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
simp_rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
#align polynomial.frange_one Polynomial.coeffs_one
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-17")] alias frange_one := coeffs_one
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 279 | 282 | theorem coeff_mem_coeffs (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (h : p.coeff n ≠ 0) : p.coeff n ∈ p.coeffs := by |
classical
simp only [coeffs, exists_prop, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_image, Ne]
exact ⟨n, h, rfl⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 78 | 82 | theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by |
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotientNoetherian
#align_import ring_theory.adjoin_root from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5c4b3d41a84bd2a1d79c7d9265e58a891e71be89"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
#align adjoin_root AdjoinRoot
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
#align adjoin_root.comm_ring AdjoinRoot.instCommRing
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
#align adjoin_root.nontrivial AdjoinRoot.nontrivial
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
#align adjoin_root.mk AdjoinRoot.mk
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
#align adjoin_root.induction_on AdjoinRoot.induction_on
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
#align adjoin_root.of AdjoinRoot.of
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.smul_mk AdjoinRoot.smul_mk
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
#align adjoin_root.smul_of AdjoinRoot.smul_of
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
instance isScalarTower_right [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (AdjoinRoot f) (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
#align adjoin_root.is_scalar_tower_right AdjoinRoot.isScalarTower_right
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (f : R[X]) :
DistribMulAction S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribMulAction' _
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.algebra S
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (AdjoinRoot f) = of f :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq
variable (S)
theorem algebraMap_eq' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] :
algebraMap S (AdjoinRoot f) = (of f).comp (algebraMap S R) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq' AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq'
variable {S}
theorem finiteType : Algebra.FiniteType R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FiniteType.polynomial R).of_surjective _ (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _)
#align adjoin_root.finite_type AdjoinRoot.finiteType
theorem finitePresentation : Algebra.FinitePresentation R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FinitePresentation.polynomial R).quotient (Submodule.fg_span_singleton f)
#align adjoin_root.finite_presentation AdjoinRoot.finitePresentation
def root : AdjoinRoot f :=
mk f X
#align adjoin_root.root AdjoinRoot.root
variable {f}
instance hasCoeT : CoeTC R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨of f⟩
#align adjoin_root.has_coe_t AdjoinRoot.hasCoeT
@[ext]
theorem algHom_ext [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {g₁ g₂ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S}
(h : g₁ (root f) = g₂ (root f)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext R <| Polynomial.algHom_ext h
#align adjoin_root.alg_hom_ext AdjoinRoot.algHom_ext
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {g h : R[X]} : mk f g = mk f h ↔ f ∣ g - h :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq.trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_mk AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {g : R[X]} : mk f g = 0 ↔ f ∣ g :=
mk_eq_mk.trans <| by rw [sub_zero]
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_zero AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_self : mk f f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr (mem_span_singleton.2 <| by simp)
#align adjoin_root.mk_self AdjoinRoot.mk_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_C (x : R) : mk f (C x) = x :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_C AdjoinRoot.mk_C
@[simp]
theorem mk_X : mk f X = root f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_X AdjoinRoot.mk_X
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0) (hd : degree g < degree f) :
mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_degree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0)
(hd : natDegree g < natDegree f) : mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_nat_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (p : R[X]) : aeval (root f) p = mk f p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p
(fun x => by
rw [aeval_C]
rfl)
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, aeval_C, AlgHom.map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, mk_C, RingHom.map_pow,
mk_X]
rfl
#align adjoin_root.aeval_eq AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq
-- Porting note: the following proof was partly in term-mode, but I was not able to fix it.
theorem adjoinRoot_eq_top : Algebra.adjoin R ({root f} : Set (AdjoinRoot f)) = ⊤ := by
refine Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => ?_
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on with
| ih p => exact (Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval R (root f)).symm ▸ ⟨p, aeval_eq p⟩
#align adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top AdjoinRoot.adjoinRoot_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_root (f : R[X]) : f.eval₂ (of f) (root f) = 0 := by
rw [← algebraMap_eq, ← aeval_def, aeval_eq, mk_self]
#align adjoin_root.eval₂_root AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 248 | 249 | theorem isRoot_root (f : R[X]) : IsRoot (f.map (of f)) (root f) := by |
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_root]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.preadditive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"986c4d5761f938b2e1c43c01f001b6d9d88c2055"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive CategoryTheory.MonoidalPreadditive
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensorLeft_additive
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensorRight_additive
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringLeft_additive
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringRight_additive
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : MonoidalFunctor D C) [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive_of_faithful CategoryTheory.monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
#align category_theory.tensor_sum CategoryTheory.tensor_sum
theorem sum_tensor {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ⊗ f = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ⊗ f := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, sum_whiskerRight, Preadditive.sum_comp]
#align category_theory.sum_tensor CategoryTheory.sum_tensor
-- In a closed monoidal category, this would hold because
-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint and hence preserves all colimits.
-- In any case it is true in any preadditive category.
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorLeft X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← tensor_sum, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorRight X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← sum_tensor, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
variable [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
def leftDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) : X ⊗ ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ fun j => X ⊗ f j :=
(tensorLeft X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.left_distributor CategoryTheory.leftDistributor
theorem leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom =
∑ j : J, (X ◁ biproduct.π f j) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_hom
theorem leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp, zero_comp,
Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp,
biproduct.ι_desc]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = X ◁ biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j) ≫ (leftDistributor X f).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.π _ j) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (leftDistributor X f).inv = X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
theorem leftDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X Y : C) (f : J → C) :
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ leftDistributor Y f) ≪≫ leftDistributor X _ =
(α_ X Y (⨁ f)).symm ≪≫ leftDistributor (X ⊗ Y) f ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => α_ X Y _ := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, tensor_sum,
id_tensor_comp, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero]
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π]
simp only [id_tensor_comp, tensor_dite, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_assoc
def rightDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) : (⨁ f) ⊗ X ≅ ⨁ fun j => f j ⊗ X :=
(tensorRight X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.right_distributor CategoryTheory.rightDistributor
theorem rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom =
∑ j : J, (biproduct.π f j ▷ X) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_hom
theorem rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [biproduct.ι_desc, Preadditive.comp_sum, ne_eq, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = biproduct.π _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X) ≫ (rightDistributor f X).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
dite_whiskerRight, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv ≫ (biproduct.π _ j ▷ X) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.comp_whiskerRight,
biproduct.ι_π, dite_whiskerRight, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (rightDistributor f X).inv = biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc,
dite_comp]
theorem rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X Y : C) :
(rightDistributor f X ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ (⨁ f) X Y ≪≫ rightDistributor f (X ⊗ Y) ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ X Y).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, rightDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, biproduct.ι_π, dite_tensor, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_assoc
theorem leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type _} [Fintype J]
(X : C) (f : J → C) (Y : C) :
(leftDistributor X f ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ X (⨁ f) Y ≪≫
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ rightDistributor _ Y) ≪≫
leftDistributor X _ ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ _ _).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
tensor_sum, comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, rightDistributor_hom,
biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map, biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero, Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, ← id_tensor_comp_assoc, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
dite_comp, tensor_dite, dite_tensor]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_left {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ ⨁ f ⟶ Y}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ g = (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ h) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (leftDistributor X f).inv).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp] says
simp only [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
apply w
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_right {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⟶ Y ⊗ ⨁ f}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j) = h ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j)) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_mono (leftDistributor Y f).hom).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
comp_dite] says
simp only [leftDistributor_hom, Category.assoc, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
comp_zero, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
apply w
-- One might wonder how many iterated tensor products we need simp lemmas for.
-- The answer is two: this lemma is needed to verify the pentagon identity.
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext₂_left {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{X Y Z : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ (Y ⊗ ⨁ f) ⟶ Z}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ g = (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ h) :
g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom).mp
ext
simp [w]
@[ext]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 318 | 324 | theorem leftDistributor_ext₂_right {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{X Y Z : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⟶ Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ ⨁ f)}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (Y ◁ (Z ◁ biproduct.π f j)) = h ≫ (Y ◁ (Z ◁ biproduct.π f j))) :
g = h := by |
apply (cancel_mono (α_ _ _ _).inv).mp
ext
simp [w]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 375 | 377 | theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by |
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import probability.kernel.integral_comp_prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0d694db494dd4f9aa57f2714b6e4c82b4ebc113"
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory
open Set Function Real ENNReal MeasureTheory Filter ProbabilityTheory ProbabilityTheory.kernel
variable {α β γ E : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
{mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {κ : kernel α β} [IsSFiniteKernel κ]
{η : kernel (α × β) γ} [IsSFiniteKernel η] {a : α}
namespace ProbabilityTheory
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left (a : α) {s : Set (β × γ)} (h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) :
HasFiniteIntegral (fun b => (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal) (κ a) := by
let t := toMeasurable ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) s
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg]
calc
∫⁻ b, ENNReal.ofReal (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal ∂κ a
_ ≤ ∫⁻ b, η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' t) ∂κ a := by
refine lintegral_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [ae_kernel_lt_top a h2s] with b hb
rw [ofReal_toReal hb.ne]
exact measure_mono (preimage_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _))
_ ≤ (κ ⊗ₖ η) a t := le_compProd_apply _ _ _ _
_ = (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s := measure_toMeasurable s
_ < ⊤ := h2s.lt_top
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_prod_mk_left ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left
theorem integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left (a : α) {s : Set (β × γ)} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (κ ⊗ₖ η) a s ≠ ∞) : Integrable (fun b => (η (a, b) (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s)).toReal) (κ a) := by
constructor
· exact (measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left' hs a).ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact hasFiniteIntegral_prod_mk_left a h2s
#align probability_theory.integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left ProbabilityTheory.integrable_kernel_prod_mk_left
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd [NormedSpace ℝ E]
⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
⟨fun x => ∫ y, hf.mk f (x, y) ∂η (a, x), hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.integral_kernel_prod_right'', by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hf.ae_eq_mk] with _ hx using integral_congr_ae hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.integral_kernel_comp_prod MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.compProd_mk_left {δ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace δ]
{f : β × γ → δ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x)) := by
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx using
⟨fun y => hf.mk f (x, y), hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left, hx⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.comp_prod_mk_left MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.compProd_mk_left
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (h1f : StronglyMeasurable f) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
simp only [HasFiniteIntegral]
rw [kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ h1f.ennnorm]
have : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ y ∂η (a, x), 0 ≤ ‖f (x, y)‖ := fun x => eventually_of_forall fun y => norm_nonneg _
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (this _)
(h1f.norm.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left).aestronglyMeasurable,
ennnorm_eq_ofReal toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
have : ∀ {p q r : Prop} (_ : r → p), (r ↔ p ∧ q) ↔ p → (r ↔ q) := fun {p q r} h1 => by
rw [← and_congr_right_iff, and_iff_right_of_imp h1]
rw [this]
· intro h2f; rw [lintegral_congr_ae]
filter_upwards [h2f] with x hx
rw [ofReal_toReal]; rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]; exact hx
· intro h2f; refine ae_lt_top ?_ h2f.ne; exact h1f.ennnorm.lintegral_kernel_prod_right''
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_comp_prod_iff ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff' ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(h1f : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
HasFiniteIntegral f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, HasFiniteIntegral (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
rw [hasFiniteIntegral_congr h1f.ae_eq_mk,
hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff h1f.stronglyMeasurable_mk]
apply and_congr
· apply eventually_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm] with x hx using
hasFiniteIntegral_congr hx
· apply hasFiniteIntegral_congr
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd h1f.ae_eq_mk.symm] with _ hx using
integral_congr_ae (EventuallyEq.fun_comp hx _)
#align probability_theory.has_finite_integral_comp_prod_iff' ProbabilityTheory.hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff'
theorem integrable_compProd_iff ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) ↔
(∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, Integrable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x))) ∧
Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) := by
simp only [Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_compProd_iff' hf, hf.norm.integral_kernel_compProd,
hf, hf.compProd_mk_left, eventually_and, true_and_iff]
#align probability_theory.integrable_comp_prod_iff ProbabilityTheory.integrable_compProd_iff
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.compProd_mk_left_ae ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) : ∀ᵐ x ∂κ a, Integrable (fun y => f (x, y)) (η (a, x)) :=
((integrable_compProd_iff hf.aestronglyMeasurable).mp hf).1
#align measure_theory.integrable.comp_prod_mk_left_ae MeasureTheory.Integrable.compProd_mk_left_ae
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_norm_compProd ⦃f : β × γ → E⦄
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) : Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, ‖f (x, y)‖ ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
((integrable_compProd_iff hf.aestronglyMeasurable).mp hf).2
#align measure_theory.integrable.integral_norm_comp_prod MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_norm_compProd
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_compProd [NormedSpace ℝ E]
⦃f : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
Integrable (fun x => ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) (κ a) :=
Integrable.mono hf.integral_norm_compProd hf.aestronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd <|
eventually_of_forall fun x =>
(norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans_eq <|
(norm_of_nonneg <|
integral_nonneg_of_ae <|
eventually_of_forall fun y => (norm_nonneg (f (x, y)) : _)).symm
#align measure_theory.integrable.integral_comp_prod MeasureTheory.Integrable.integral_compProd
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
theorem kernel.integral_fn_integral_add ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (F : E → E')
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) (hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) + g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a =
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) + ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.compProd_mk_left_ae, hg.compProd_mk_left_ae] with _ h2f h2g
simp [integral_add h2f h2g]
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_add
theorem kernel.integral_fn_integral_sub ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (F : E → E')
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) (hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) - g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a =
∫ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) - ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.compProd_mk_left_ae, hg.compProd_mk_left_ae] with _ h2f h2g
simp [integral_sub h2f h2g]
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_sub ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_fn_integral_sub
theorem kernel.lintegral_fn_integral_sub ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (F : E → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) (hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫⁻ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) - g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a =
∫⁻ x, F (∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) - ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x)) ∂κ a := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.compProd_mk_left_ae, hg.compProd_mk_left_ae] with _ h2f h2g
simp [integral_sub h2f h2g]
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_fn_integral_sub ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_fn_integral_sub
theorem kernel.integral_integral_add ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a))
(hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) + g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a =
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a + ∫ x, ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a :=
(kernel.integral_fn_integral_add id hf hg).trans <|
integral_add hf.integral_compProd hg.integral_compProd
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_integral_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_integral_add
theorem kernel.integral_integral_add' ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a))
(hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, ∫ y, (f + g) (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a =
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a + ∫ x, ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a :=
kernel.integral_integral_add hf hg
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_integral_add' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_integral_add'
theorem kernel.integral_integral_sub ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a))
(hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) - g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a =
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a - ∫ x, ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a :=
(kernel.integral_fn_integral_sub id hf hg).trans <|
integral_sub hf.integral_compProd hg.integral_compProd
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_integral_sub ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_integral_sub
theorem kernel.integral_integral_sub' ⦃f g : β × γ → E⦄ (hf : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a))
(hg : Integrable g ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ x, ∫ y, (f - g) (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a =
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a - ∫ x, ∫ y, g (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a :=
kernel.integral_integral_sub hf hg
#align probability_theory.kernel.integral_integral_sub' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.integral_integral_sub'
-- Porting note: couldn't get the `→₁[]` syntax to work
theorem kernel.continuous_integral_integral :
-- Continuous fun f : α × β →₁[(κ ⊗ₖ η) a] E => ∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
Continuous fun f : (MeasureTheory.Lp (α := β × γ) E 1 (((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) : Measure (β × γ))) =>
∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt]; intro g
refine
tendsto_integral_of_L1 _ (L1.integrable_coeFn g).integral_compProd
(eventually_of_forall fun h => (L1.integrable_coeFn h).integral_compProd) ?_
simp_rw [←
kernel.lintegral_fn_integral_sub (fun x => (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) (L1.integrable_coeFn _)
(L1.integrable_coeFn g)]
apply tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds _ (fun i => zero_le _) _
· exact fun i => ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, ‖i (x, y) - g (x, y)‖₊ ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a
swap; · exact fun i => lintegral_mono fun x => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
show
Tendsto
(fun i : β × γ →₁[(κ ⊗ₖ η) a] E => ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y : γ, ‖i (x, y) - g (x, y)‖₊ ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a)
(𝓝 g) (𝓝 0)
have : ∀ i : (MeasureTheory.Lp (α := β × γ) E 1 (((κ ⊗ₖ η) a) : Measure (β × γ))),
Measurable fun z => (‖i z - g z‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := fun i =>
((Lp.stronglyMeasurable i).sub (Lp.stronglyMeasurable g)).ennnorm
simp_rw [← kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ (this _), ← L1.ofReal_norm_sub_eq_lintegral, ←
ofReal_zero]
refine (continuous_ofReal.tendsto 0).comp ?_
rw [← tendsto_iff_norm_sub_tendsto_zero]
exact tendsto_id
#align probability_theory.kernel.continuous_integral_integral ProbabilityTheory.kernel.continuous_integral_integral
theorem integral_compProd :
∀ {f : β × γ → E} (_ : Integrable f ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)),
∫ z, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫ x, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
by_cases hE : CompleteSpace E; swap
· simp [integral, hE]
apply Integrable.induction
· intro c s hs h2s
simp_rw [integral_indicator hs, ← indicator_comp_right, Function.comp,
integral_indicator (measurable_prod_mk_left hs), MeasureTheory.setIntegral_const,
integral_smul_const]
congr 1
rw [integral_toReal]
rotate_left
· exact (kernel.measurable_kernel_prod_mk_left' hs _).aemeasurable
· exact ae_kernel_lt_top a h2s.ne
rw [kernel.compProd_apply _ _ _ hs]
rfl
· intro f g _ i_f i_g hf hg
simp_rw [integral_add' i_f i_g, kernel.integral_integral_add' i_f i_g, hf, hg]
· exact isClosed_eq continuous_integral kernel.continuous_integral_integral
· intro f g hfg _ hf
convert hf using 1
· exact integral_congr_ae hfg.symm
· apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [ae_ae_of_ae_compProd hfg] with x hfgx using
integral_congr_ae (ae_eq_symm hfgx)
#align probability_theory.integral_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.integral_compProd
theorem setIntegral_compProd {f : β × γ → E} {s : Set β} {t : Set γ} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ z in s ×ˢ t, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫ x in s, ∫ y in t, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
-- Porting note: `compProd_restrict` needed some explicit argumnts
rw [← kernel.restrict_apply (κ ⊗ₖ η) (hs.prod ht), ← compProd_restrict hs ht, integral_compProd]
· simp_rw [kernel.restrict_apply]
· rw [compProd_restrict, kernel.restrict_apply]; exact hf
#align probability_theory.set_integral_comp_prod ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_compProd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_compProd := setIntegral_compProd
theorem setIntegral_compProd_univ_right (f : β × γ → E) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ univ) ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ z in s ×ˢ univ, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫ x in s, ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by
simp_rw [setIntegral_compProd hs MeasurableSet.univ hf, Measure.restrict_univ]
#align probability_theory.set_integral_comp_prod_univ_right ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_compProd_univ_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias set_integral_compProd_univ_right := setIntegral_compProd_univ_right
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/IntegralCompProd.lean | 293 | 296 | theorem setIntegral_compProd_univ_left (f : β × γ → E) {t : Set γ} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (univ ×ˢ t) ((κ ⊗ₖ η) a)) :
∫ z in univ ×ˢ t, f z ∂(κ ⊗ₖ η) a = ∫ x, ∫ y in t, f (x, y) ∂η (a, x) ∂κ a := by |
simp_rw [setIntegral_compProd MeasurableSet.univ ht hf, Measure.restrict_univ]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.ExteriorAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Fold
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Conjugation
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
#align_import linear_algebra.clifford_algebra.contraction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
universe u1 u2 u3
variable {R : Type u1} [CommRing R]
variable {M : Type u2} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable (Q : QuadraticForm R M)
namespace CliffordAlgebra
section contractLeft
variable (d d' : Module.Dual R M)
@[simps!]
def contractLeftAux (d : Module.Dual R M) :
M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q × CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
haveI v_mul := (Algebra.lmul R (CliffordAlgebra Q)).toLinearMap ∘ₗ ι Q
d.smulRight (LinearMap.fst _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) (CliffordAlgebra Q)) -
v_mul.compl₂ (LinearMap.snd _ (CliffordAlgebra Q) _)
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_aux CliffordAlgebra.contractLeftAux
theorem contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux (v : M) (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (fx : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractLeftAux Q d v (ι Q v * x, contractLeftAux Q d v (x, fx)) = Q v • fx := by
simp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, ← Algebra.smul_def, ← sub_add, mul_smul_comm, sub_self,
zero_add]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_aux_contract_left_aux CliffordAlgebra.contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux
variable {Q}
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q where
toFun d := foldr' Q (contractLeftAux Q d) (contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d) 0
map_add' d₁ d₂ :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [LinearMap.add_apply]
induction' x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy m x hx
· simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero, zero_add]
· rw [map_add, map_add, map_add, add_add_add_comm, hx, hy]
· rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [sub_add_sub_comm, mul_add, LinearMap.add_apply, add_smul]
map_smul' c d :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => by
dsimp only
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
induction' x using CliffordAlgebra.left_induction with r x y hx hy m x hx
· simp_rw [foldr'_algebraMap, smul_zero]
· rw [map_add, map_add, smul_add, hx, hy]
· rw [foldr'_ι_mul, foldr'_ι_mul, hx]
dsimp only [contractLeftAux_apply_apply]
rw [LinearMap.smul_apply, smul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, smul_sub]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft
def contractRight : CliffordAlgebra Q →ₗ[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] CliffordAlgebra Q :=
LinearMap.flip (LinearMap.compl₂ (LinearMap.compr₂ contractLeft reverse) reverse)
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right CliffordAlgebra.contractRight
theorem contractRight_eq (x : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
contractRight (Q := Q) x d = reverse (contractLeft (R := R) (M := M) d <| reverse x) :=
rfl
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_eq CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_eq
local infixl:70 "⌋" => contractLeft (R := R) (M := M)
local infixl:70 "⌊" => contractRight (R := R) (M := M) (Q := Q)
-- Porting note: Lean needs to be reminded of this instance otherwise the statement of the
-- next result times out
instance : SMul R (CliffordAlgebra Q) := inferInstance
theorem contractLeft_ι_mul (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(ι Q a * b) = d a • b - ι Q a * (d⌋b) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine foldr'_ι_mul _ _ ?_ _ _ _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_ι_mul CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_ι_mul
theorem contractRight_mul_ι (a : M) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
b * ι Q a⌊d = d a • b - b⌊d * ι Q a := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι_mul, map_sub, map_smul,
reverse_reverse, reverse.map_mul, reverse_ι, contractRight_eq]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_mul_ι CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_mul_ι
theorem contractLeft_algebraMap_mul (r : R) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
d⌋(algebraMap _ _ r * b) = algebraMap _ _ r * (d⌋b) := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, map_smul, Algebra.smul_def]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_algebra_map_mul CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_algebraMap_mul
theorem contractLeft_mul_algebraMap (a : CliffordAlgebra Q) (r : R) :
d⌋(a * algebraMap _ _ r) = d⌋a * algebraMap _ _ r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, contractLeft_algebraMap_mul, Algebra.commutes]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_mul_algebra_map CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_mul_algebraMap
theorem contractRight_algebraMap_mul (r : R) (b : CliffordAlgebra Q) :
algebraMap _ _ r * b⌊d = algebraMap _ _ r * (b⌊d) := by
rw [← Algebra.smul_def, LinearMap.map_smul₂, Algebra.smul_def]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_algebra_map_mul CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_algebraMap_mul
theorem contractRight_mul_algebraMap (a : CliffordAlgebra Q) (r : R) :
a * algebraMap _ _ r⌊d = a⌊d * algebraMap _ _ r := by
rw [← Algebra.commutes, contractRight_algebraMap_mul, Algebra.commutes]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_mul_algebra_map CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_mul_algebraMap
variable (Q)
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_ι (x : M) : d⌋ι Q x = algebraMap R _ (d x) := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine (foldr'_ι _ _ ?_ _ _).trans <| by
simp_rw [contractLeftAux_apply_apply, mul_zero, sub_zero,
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_ι CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_ι
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_ι (x : M) : ι Q x⌊d = algebraMap R _ (d x) := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse_ι, contractLeft_ι, reverse.commutes]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_ι CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_ι
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_algebraMap (r : R) : d⌋algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r = 0 := by
-- Porting note: Lean cannot figure out anymore the third argument
refine (foldr'_algebraMap _ _ ?_ _ _).trans <| smul_zero _
exact fun m x fx ↦ contractLeftAux_contractLeftAux Q d m x fx
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_algebra_map CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_algebraMap (r : R) : algebraMap R (CliffordAlgebra Q) r⌊d = 0 := by
rw [contractRight_eq, reverse.commutes, contractLeft_algebraMap, map_zero]
#align clifford_algebra.contract_right_algebra_map CliffordAlgebra.contractRight_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_one : d⌋(1 : CliffordAlgebra Q) = 0 := by
simpa only [map_one] using contractLeft_algebraMap Q d 1
#align clifford_algebra.contract_left_one CliffordAlgebra.contractLeft_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 198 | 199 | theorem contractRight_one : (1 : CliffordAlgebra Q)⌊d = 0 := by |
simpa only [map_one] using contractRight_algebraMap Q d 1
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.