Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.FiberBundle.IsHomeomorphicTrivialBundle
#align_import analysis.complex.re_im_topology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"468b141b14016d54b479eb7a0fff1e360b7e3cf6"
open Set
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ re :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align complex.is_homeomorphic_trivial_fiber_bundle_re Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re
theorem isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im : IsHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle ℝ im :=
⟨equivRealProdCLM.toHomeomorph.trans (Homeomorph.prodComm ℝ ℝ), fun _ => rfl⟩
#align complex.is_homeomorphic_trivial_fiber_bundle_im Complex.isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im
theorem isOpenMap_re : IsOpenMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.isOpenMap_proj
#align complex.is_open_map_re Complex.isOpenMap_re
theorem isOpenMap_im : IsOpenMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.isOpenMap_proj
#align complex.is_open_map_im Complex.isOpenMap_im
theorem quotientMap_re : QuotientMap re :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_re.quotientMap_proj
#align complex.quotient_map_re Complex.quotientMap_re
theorem quotientMap_im : QuotientMap im :=
isHomeomorphicTrivialFiberBundle_im.quotientMap_proj
#align complex.quotient_map_im Complex.quotientMap_im
theorem interior_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : interior (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_re _).symm
#align complex.interior_preimage_re Complex.interior_preimage_re
theorem interior_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : interior (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' interior s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_interior_eq_interior_preimage continuous_im _).symm
#align complex.interior_preimage_im Complex.interior_preimage_im
theorem closure_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : closure (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_re _).symm
#align complex.closure_preimage_re Complex.closure_preimage_re
theorem closure_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : closure (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' closure s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_closure_eq_closure_preimage continuous_im _).symm
#align complex.closure_preimage_im Complex.closure_preimage_im
theorem frontier_preimage_re (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (re ⁻¹' s) = re ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_re.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_re _).symm
#align complex.frontier_preimage_re Complex.frontier_preimage_re
theorem frontier_preimage_im (s : Set ℝ) : frontier (im ⁻¹' s) = im ⁻¹' frontier s :=
(isOpenMap_im.preimage_frontier_eq_frontier_preimage continuous_im _).symm
#align complex.frontier_preimage_im Complex.frontier_preimage_im
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_re (Iic a)
#align complex.interior_set_of_re_le Complex.interior_setOf_re_le
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im < a } := by
simpa only [interior_Iic] using interior_preimage_im (Iic a)
#align complex.interior_set_of_im_le Complex.interior_setOf_im_le
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | a < z.re } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_re (Ici a)
#align complex.interior_set_of_le_re Complex.interior_setOf_le_re
@[simp]
theorem interior_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : interior { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | a < z.im } := by
simpa only [interior_Ici] using interior_preimage_im (Ici a)
#align complex.interior_set_of_le_im Complex.interior_setOf_le_im
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_re (Iio a)
#align complex.closure_set_of_re_lt Complex.closure_setOf_re_lt
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im ≤ a } := by
simpa only [closure_Iio] using closure_preimage_im (Iio a)
#align complex.closure_set_of_im_lt Complex.closure_setOf_im_lt
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | a ≤ z.re } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_re (Ioi a)
#align complex.closure_set_of_lt_re Complex.closure_setOf_lt_re
@[simp]
theorem closure_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : closure { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | a ≤ z.im } := by
simpa only [closure_Ioi] using closure_preimage_im (Ioi a)
#align complex.closure_set_of_lt_im Complex.closure_setOf_lt_im
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re ≤ a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_re (Iic a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_re_le Complex.frontier_setOf_re_le
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_le (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im ≤ a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iic] using frontier_preimage_im (Iic a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_im_le Complex.frontier_setOf_im_le
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_re (Ici a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_le_re Complex.frontier_setOf_le_re
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_le_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a ≤ z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ici] using frontier_preimage_im (Ici a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_le_im Complex.frontier_setOf_le_im
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_re_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.re < a } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_re (Iio a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_re_lt Complex.frontier_setOf_re_lt
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_im_lt (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | z.im < a } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Iio] using frontier_preimage_im (Iio a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_im_lt Complex.frontier_setOf_im_lt
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_re (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.re } = { z | z.re = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_re (Ioi a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_lt_re Complex.frontier_setOf_lt_re
@[simp]
theorem frontier_setOf_lt_im (a : ℝ) : frontier { z : ℂ | a < z.im } = { z | z.im = a } := by
simpa only [frontier_Ioi] using frontier_preimage_im (Ioi a)
#align complex.frontier_set_of_lt_im Complex.frontier_setOf_lt_im
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/ReImTopology.lean | 173 | 175 | theorem closure_reProdIm (s t : Set ℝ) : closure (s ×ℂ t) = closure s ×ℂ closure t := by |
simpa only [← preimage_eq_preimage equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.surjective,
equivRealProdCLM.symm.toHomeomorph.preimage_closure] using @closure_prod_eq _ _ _ _ s t
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.Pow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.SMulWithZero
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
#align_import algebra.tropical.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9116dd6709f303dcf781632e15fdef382b0fc579"
universe u v
variable (R : Type u)
def Tropical : Type u :=
R
#align tropical Tropical
variable {R}
namespace Tropical
--@[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented in Lean4
def trop : R → Tropical R :=
id
#align tropical.trop Tropical.trop
--@[pp_nodot] Porting note: not implemented in Lean4
def untrop : Tropical R → R :=
id
#align tropical.untrop Tropical.untrop
theorem trop_injective : Function.Injective (trop : R → Tropical R) := fun _ _ => id
#align tropical.trop_injective Tropical.trop_injective
theorem untrop_injective : Function.Injective (untrop : Tropical R → R) := fun _ _ => id
#align tropical.untrop_injective Tropical.untrop_injective
@[simp]
theorem trop_inj_iff (x y : R) : trop x = trop y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align tropical.trop_inj_iff Tropical.trop_inj_iff
@[simp]
theorem untrop_inj_iff (x y : Tropical R) : untrop x = untrop y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align tropical.untrop_inj_iff Tropical.untrop_inj_iff
@[simp]
theorem trop_untrop (x : Tropical R) : trop (untrop x) = x :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_untrop Tropical.trop_untrop
@[simp]
theorem untrop_trop (x : R) : untrop (trop x) = x :=
rfl
#align tropical.untrop_trop Tropical.untrop_trop
-- Porting note: New attribute seems to fix things
attribute [irreducible] Tropical
theorem leftInverse_trop : Function.LeftInverse (trop : R → Tropical R) untrop :=
trop_untrop
#align tropical.left_inverse_trop Tropical.leftInverse_trop
theorem rightInverse_trop : Function.RightInverse (trop : R → Tropical R) untrop :=
untrop_trop
#align tropical.right_inverse_trop Tropical.rightInverse_trop
def tropEquiv : R ≃ Tropical R where
toFun := trop
invFun := untrop
left_inv := untrop_trop
right_inv := trop_untrop
#align tropical.trop_equiv Tropical.tropEquiv
@[simp]
theorem tropEquiv_coe_fn : (tropEquiv : R → Tropical R) = trop :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_equiv_coe_fn Tropical.tropEquiv_coe_fn
@[simp]
theorem tropEquiv_symm_coe_fn : (tropEquiv.symm : Tropical R → R) = untrop :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_equiv_symm_coe_fn Tropical.tropEquiv_symm_coe_fn
theorem trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop {x : R} {y} : trop x = y ↔ x = untrop y :=
tropEquiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
#align tropical.trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop Tropical.trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop
theorem untrop_eq_iff_eq_trop {x} {y : R} : untrop x = y ↔ x = trop y :=
tropEquiv.symm.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
#align tropical.untrop_eq_iff_eq_trop Tropical.untrop_eq_iff_eq_trop
theorem injective_trop : Function.Injective (trop : R → Tropical R) :=
tropEquiv.injective
#align tropical.injective_trop Tropical.injective_trop
theorem injective_untrop : Function.Injective (untrop : Tropical R → R) :=
tropEquiv.symm.injective
#align tropical.injective_untrop Tropical.injective_untrop
theorem surjective_trop : Function.Surjective (trop : R → Tropical R) :=
tropEquiv.surjective
#align tropical.surjective_trop Tropical.surjective_trop
theorem surjective_untrop : Function.Surjective (untrop : Tropical R → R) :=
tropEquiv.symm.surjective
#align tropical.surjective_untrop Tropical.surjective_untrop
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Tropical R) :=
⟨trop default⟩
@[simp]
def tropRec {F : Tropical R → Sort v} (h : ∀ X, F (trop X)) : ∀ X, F X := fun X => h (untrop X)
#align tropical.trop_rec Tropical.tropRec
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq (Tropical R) := fun _ _ =>
decidable_of_iff _ injective_untrop.eq_iff
section Order
instance instLETropical [LE R] : LE (Tropical R) where le x y := untrop x ≤ untrop y
@[simp]
theorem untrop_le_iff [LE R] {x y : Tropical R} : untrop x ≤ untrop y ↔ x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align tropical.untrop_le_iff Tropical.untrop_le_iff
instance decidableLE [LE R] [DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : R → R → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : Tropical R → Tropical R → Prop) := fun x y =>
‹DecidableRel (· ≤ ·)› (untrop x) (untrop y)
#align tropical.decidable_le Tropical.decidableLE
instance instLTTropical [LT R] : LT (Tropical R) where lt x y := untrop x < untrop y
@[simp]
theorem untrop_lt_iff [LT R] {x y : Tropical R} : untrop x < untrop y ↔ x < y :=
Iff.rfl
#align tropical.untrop_lt_iff Tropical.untrop_lt_iff
instance decidableLT [LT R] [DecidableRel ((· < ·) : R → R → Prop)] :
DecidableRel ((· < ·) : Tropical R → Tropical R → Prop) := fun x y =>
‹DecidableRel (· < ·)› (untrop x) (untrop y)
#align tropical.decidable_lt Tropical.decidableLT
instance instPreorderTropical [Preorder R] : Preorder (Tropical R) :=
{ instLETropical, instLTTropical with
le_refl := fun x => le_refl (untrop x)
le_trans := fun _ _ _ h h' => le_trans (α := R) h h'
lt_iff_le_not_le := fun _ _ => lt_iff_le_not_le (α := R) }
def tropOrderIso [Preorder R] : R ≃o Tropical R :=
{ tropEquiv with map_rel_iff' := untrop_le_iff }
#align tropical.trop_order_iso Tropical.tropOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem tropOrderIso_coe_fn [Preorder R] : (tropOrderIso : R → Tropical R) = trop :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_order_iso_coe_fn Tropical.tropOrderIso_coe_fn
@[simp]
theorem tropOrderIso_symm_coe_fn [Preorder R] : (tropOrderIso.symm : Tropical R → R) = untrop :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_order_iso_symm_coe_fn Tropical.tropOrderIso_symm_coe_fn
theorem trop_monotone [Preorder R] : Monotone (trop : R → Tropical R) := fun _ _ => id
#align tropical.trop_monotone Tropical.trop_monotone
theorem untrop_monotone [Preorder R] : Monotone (untrop : Tropical R → R) := fun _ _ => id
#align tropical.untrop_monotone Tropical.untrop_monotone
instance instPartialOrderTropical [PartialOrder R] : PartialOrder (Tropical R) :=
{ instPreorderTropical with le_antisymm := fun _ _ h h' => untrop_injective (le_antisymm h h') }
instance instZeroTropical [Top R] : Zero (Tropical R) :=
⟨trop ⊤⟩
instance instTopTropical [Top R] : Top (Tropical R) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem untrop_zero [Top R] : untrop (0 : Tropical R) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align tropical.untrop_zero Tropical.untrop_zero
@[simp]
theorem trop_top [Top R] : trop (⊤ : R) = 0 :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_top Tropical.trop_top
@[simp]
theorem trop_coe_ne_zero (x : R) : trop (x : WithTop R) ≠ 0 :=
nofun
#align tropical.trop_coe_ne_zero Tropical.trop_coe_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_trop_coe (x : R) : (0 : Tropical (WithTop R)) ≠ trop x :=
nofun
#align tropical.zero_ne_trop_coe Tropical.zero_ne_trop_coe
@[simp]
theorem le_zero [LE R] [OrderTop R] (x : Tropical R) : x ≤ 0 :=
le_top (α := R)
#align tropical.le_zero Tropical.le_zero
instance [LE R] [OrderTop R] : OrderTop (Tropical R) :=
{ instTopTropical with le_top := fun _ => le_top (α := R) }
variable [LinearOrder R]
instance : Add (Tropical R) :=
⟨fun x y => trop (min (untrop x) (untrop y))⟩
instance instAddCommSemigroupTropical : AddCommSemigroup (Tropical R) where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc _ _ _ := untrop_injective (min_assoc _ _ _)
add_comm _ _ := untrop_injective (min_comm _ _)
@[simp]
theorem untrop_add (x y : Tropical R) : untrop (x + y) = min (untrop x) (untrop y) :=
rfl
#align tropical.untrop_add Tropical.untrop_add
@[simp]
theorem trop_min (x y : R) : trop (min x y) = trop x + trop y :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_min Tropical.trop_min
@[simp]
theorem trop_inf (x y : R) : trop (x ⊓ y) = trop x + trop y :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_inf Tropical.trop_inf
theorem trop_add_def (x y : Tropical R) : x + y = trop (min (untrop x) (untrop y)) :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_add_def Tropical.trop_add_def
instance instLinearOrderTropical : LinearOrder (Tropical R) :=
{ instPartialOrderTropical with
le_total := fun a b => le_total (untrop a) (untrop b)
decidableLE := Tropical.decidableLE
max := fun a b => trop (max (untrop a) (untrop b))
max_def := fun a b => untrop_injective (by
simp only [max_def, untrop_le_iff, untrop_trop]; split_ifs <;> simp)
min := (· + ·)
min_def := fun a b => untrop_injective (by
simp only [untrop_add, min_def, untrop_le_iff]; split_ifs <;> simp) }
@[simp]
theorem untrop_sup (x y : Tropical R) : untrop (x ⊔ y) = untrop x ⊔ untrop y :=
rfl
#align tropical.untrop_sup Tropical.untrop_sup
@[simp]
theorem untrop_max (x y : Tropical R) : untrop (max x y) = max (untrop x) (untrop y) :=
rfl
#align tropical.untrop_max Tropical.untrop_max
@[simp]
theorem min_eq_add : (min : Tropical R → Tropical R → Tropical R) = (· + ·) :=
rfl
#align tropical.min_eq_add Tropical.min_eq_add
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_add : ((· ⊓ ·) : Tropical R → Tropical R → Tropical R) = (· + ·) :=
rfl
#align tropical.inf_eq_add Tropical.inf_eq_add
theorem trop_max_def (x y : Tropical R) : max x y = trop (max (untrop x) (untrop y)) :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_max_def Tropical.trop_max_def
theorem trop_sup_def (x y : Tropical R) : x ⊔ y = trop (untrop x ⊔ untrop y) :=
rfl
#align tropical.trop_sup_def Tropical.trop_sup_def
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_left ⦃x y : Tropical R⦄ (h : x ≤ y) : x + y = x :=
untrop_injective (by simpa using h)
#align tropical.add_eq_left Tropical.add_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_right ⦃x y : Tropical R⦄ (h : y ≤ x) : x + y = y :=
untrop_injective (by simpa using h)
#align tropical.add_eq_right Tropical.add_eq_right
theorem add_eq_left_iff {x y : Tropical R} : x + y = x ↔ x ≤ y := by
rw [trop_add_def, trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop, ← untrop_le_iff, min_eq_left_iff]
#align tropical.add_eq_left_iff Tropical.add_eq_left_iff
theorem add_eq_right_iff {x y : Tropical R} : x + y = y ↔ y ≤ x := by
rw [trop_add_def, trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop, ← untrop_le_iff, min_eq_right_iff]
#align tropical.add_eq_right_iff Tropical.add_eq_right_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem add_self (x : Tropical R) : x + x = x :=
untrop_injective (min_eq_right le_rfl)
#align tropical.add_self Tropical.add_self
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem bit0 (x : Tropical R) : bit0 x = x :=
add_self x
#align tropical.bit0 Tropical.bit0
theorem add_eq_iff {x y z : Tropical R} : x + y = z ↔ x = z ∧ x ≤ y ∨ y = z ∧ y ≤ x := by
rw [trop_add_def, trop_eq_iff_eq_untrop]
simp [min_eq_iff]
#align tropical.add_eq_iff Tropical.add_eq_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Tropical/Basic.lean | 363 | 370 | theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Tropical (WithTop R)} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 := by |
rw [add_eq_iff]
constructor
· rintro (⟨rfl, h⟩ | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact ⟨rfl, le_antisymm (le_zero _) h⟩
· exact ⟨le_antisymm (le_zero _) h, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.nhds_set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Filter X}
{s t s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set X} {x : X}
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal (X) [TopologicalSpace (X × X)] :
𝓝ˢ (diagonal X) = ⨆ (x : X), 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhdsSet, ← range_diag, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align nhds_set_diagonal nhdsSet_diagonal
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∀ x : X, x ∈ t → s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [nhdsSet, Filter.mem_sSup, forall_mem_image]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_forall mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
lemma nhdsSet_le : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ f := by simp [nhdsSet]
theorem bUnion_mem_nhdsSet {t : X → Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ∈ 𝓝 x) : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => mem_of_superset (h x hx) <|
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun x _ => t x) x hx -- Porting note: fails to find `s`
#align bUnion_mem_nhds_set bUnion_mem_nhdsSet
theorem subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet : s ⊆ interior t ↔ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall, subset_interior_iff_nhds]
#align subset_interior_iff_mem_nhds_set subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet
theorem disjoint_principal_nhdsSet : Disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓝ˢ t) ↔ Disjoint (closure s) t := by
rw [disjoint_principal_left, ← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, interior_compl,
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_principal : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓟 t) ↔ Disjoint s (closure t) := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_principal_nhdsSet, disjoint_comm]
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, subset_interior_iff]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_exists mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_exists {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ t → p x :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
theorem hasBasis_nhdsSet (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).HasBasis (fun U => IsOpen U ∧ s ⊆ U) fun U => U :=
⟨fun t => by simp [mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists, and_assoc]⟩
#align has_basis_nhds_set hasBasis_nhdsSet
@[simp]
lemma lift'_nhdsSet_interior (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).lift' interior = 𝓝ˢ s :=
(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.left
lemma Filter.HasBasis.nhdsSet_interior {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {t : Set X}
(h : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhdsSet_interior t ▸ h.lift'_interior
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet (hU : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, hU.interior_eq]
#align is_open.mem_nhds_set IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet_self (ho : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := ho.mem_nhdsSet.mpr Subset.rfl
theorem principal_le_nhdsSet : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓝ˢ s := fun _s hs =>
(subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mpr hs).trans interior_subset
#align principal_le_nhds_set principal_le_nhdsSet
theorem subset_of_mem_nhdsSet (h : t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s) : s ⊆ t := principal_le_nhdsSet h
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsSet {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) : ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
principal_le_nhdsSet h
nonrec theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.self_of_nhdsSet {f g : X → Y} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : EqOn f g s :=
h.self_of_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓟 s ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← principal_le_nhdsSet.le_iff_eq, le_principal_iff, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall,
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
#align nhds_set_eq_principal_iff nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq⟩ := nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
#align is_open.nhds_set_eq IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_interior : 𝓝ˢ (interior s) = 𝓟 (interior s) :=
isOpen_interior.nhdsSet_eq
#align nhds_set_interior nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_singleton : 𝓝ˢ {x} = 𝓝 x := by simp [nhdsSet]
#align nhds_set_singleton nhdsSet_singleton
theorem mem_nhdsSet_interior : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (interior s) :=
subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mp Subset.rfl
#align mem_nhds_set_interior mem_nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_empty : 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) = ⊥ := by rw [isOpen_empty.nhdsSet_eq, principal_empty]
#align nhds_set_empty nhdsSet_empty
theorem mem_nhdsSet_empty : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) := by simp
#align mem_nhds_set_empty mem_nhdsSet_empty
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/NhdsSet.lean | 139 | 139 | theorem nhdsSet_univ : 𝓝ˢ (univ : Set X) = ⊤ := by | rw [isOpen_univ.nhdsSet_eq, principal_univ]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
#align_import data.pi.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
open Finset Fintype
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, DecidableEq (α i)]
namespace Pi
section PartialOrder
variable [∀ i, PartialOrder (α i)]
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [∀ i, LocallyFiniteOrderBot (α i)] (b : ∀ i, α i)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot (∀ i, α i) :=
.ofIic _ (fun b => piFinset fun i => Iic (b i)) fun b x => by
simp_rw [mem_piFinset, mem_Iic, le_def]
theorem card_Iic : (Iic b).card = ∏ i, (Iic (b i)).card :=
card_piFinset _
#align pi.card_Iic Pi.card_Iic
| Mathlib/Data/Pi/Interval.lean | 69 | 70 | theorem card_Iio : (Iio b).card = (∏ i, (Iic (b i)).card) - 1 := by |
rw [card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one, card_Iic]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
#align_import data.nat.cast.field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"acee671f47b8e7972a1eb6f4eed74b4b3abce829"
namespace Nat
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Field.lean | 29 | 33 | theorem cast_div [DivisionSemiring α] {m n : ℕ} (n_dvd : n ∣ m) (hn : (n : α) ≠ 0) :
((m / n : ℕ) : α) = m / n := by |
rcases n_dvd with ⟨k, rfl⟩
have : n ≠ 0 := by rintro rfl; simp at hn
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel_left _ this.bot_lt, mul_comm n, cast_mul, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hn]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sup_sdiff_right_self sup_sdiff_right_self
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
#align sup_sdiff_left_self sup_sdiff_left_self
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_right sdiff_le_sdiff_right
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_left sdiff_le_sdiff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
#align sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_le_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
#align sdiff_inf sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_left sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_right sdiff_inf_self_right
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_left Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
#align disjoint.sdiff_eq_right Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
#align disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
#align disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
#align sdiff_sdiff_le sdiff_sdiff_le
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_triangle sdiff_triangle
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
#align sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 675 | 677 | theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by |
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
#align_import analysis.calculus.taylor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3a69562db5a458db8322b190ec8d9a8bbd8a5b14"
open scoped Interval Topology Nat
open Set
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
noncomputable def taylorCoeffWithin (f : ℝ → E) (k : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : E :=
(k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ • iteratedDerivWithin k f s x₀
#align taylor_coeff_within taylorCoeffWithin
noncomputable def taylorWithin (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : PolynomialModule ℝ E :=
(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum fun k =>
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ k (taylorCoeffWithin f k s x₀))
#align taylor_within taylorWithin
noncomputable def taylorWithinEval (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) : E :=
PolynomialModule.eval x (taylorWithin f n s x₀)
#align taylor_within_eval taylorWithinEval
theorem taylorWithin_succ (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) :
taylorWithin f (n + 1) s x₀ = taylorWithin f n s x₀ +
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ (n + 1) (taylorCoeffWithin f (n + 1) s x₀)) := by
dsimp only [taylorWithin]
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ]
#align taylor_within_succ taylorWithin_succ
@[simp]
theorem taylorWithinEval_succ (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f (n + 1) s x₀ x = taylorWithinEval f n s x₀ x +
(((n + 1 : ℝ) * n !)⁻¹ * (x - x₀) ^ (n + 1)) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x₀ := by
simp_rw [taylorWithinEval, taylorWithin_succ, LinearMap.map_add, PolynomialModule.comp_eval]
congr
simp only [Polynomial.eval_sub, Polynomial.eval_X, Polynomial.eval_C,
PolynomialModule.eval_single, mul_inv_rev]
dsimp only [taylorCoeffWithin]
rw [← mul_smul, mul_comm, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mul_inv_rev]
#align taylor_within_eval_succ taylorWithinEval_succ
@[simp]
theorem taylor_within_zero_eval (f : ℝ → E) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f 0 s x₀ x = f x₀ := by
dsimp only [taylorWithinEval]
dsimp only [taylorWithin]
dsimp only [taylorCoeffWithin]
simp
#align taylor_within_zero_eval taylor_within_zero_eval
@[simp]
theorem taylorWithinEval_self (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f n s x₀ x₀ = f x₀ := by
induction' n with k hk
· exact taylor_within_zero_eval _ _ _ _
simp [hk]
#align taylor_within_eval_self taylorWithinEval_self
theorem taylor_within_apply (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) :
taylorWithinEval f n s x₀ x =
∑ k ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), ((k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - x₀) ^ k) • iteratedDerivWithin k f s x₀ := by
induction' n with k hk
· simp
rw [taylorWithinEval_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ, hk]
simp [Nat.factorial]
#align taylor_within_apply taylor_within_apply
theorem continuousOn_taylorWithinEval {f : ℝ → E} {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {s : Set ℝ}
(hs : UniqueDiffOn ℝ s) (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s) :
ContinuousOn (fun t => taylorWithinEval f n s t x) s := by
simp_rw [taylor_within_apply]
refine continuousOn_finset_sum (Finset.range (n + 1)) fun i hi => ?_
refine (continuousOn_const.mul ((continuousOn_const.sub continuousOn_id).pow _)).smul ?_
rw [contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv hs] at hf
cases' hf with hf_left
specialize hf_left i
simp only [Finset.mem_range] at hi
refine hf_left ?_
simp only [WithTop.coe_le_coe, Nat.cast_le, Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp hi]
#align continuous_on_taylor_within_eval continuousOn_taylorWithinEval
theorem monomial_has_deriv_aux (t x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => (x - y) ^ (n + 1)) (-(n + 1) * (x - t) ^ n) t := by
simp_rw [sub_eq_neg_add]
rw [← neg_one_mul, mul_comm (-1 : ℝ), mul_assoc, mul_comm (-1 : ℝ), ← mul_assoc]
convert HasDerivAt.pow (n + 1) ((hasDerivAt_id t).neg.add_const x)
simp only [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
#align monomial_has_deriv_aux monomial_has_deriv_aux
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_taylor_coeff_within {f : ℝ → E} {x y : ℝ} {k : ℕ} {s t : Set ℝ}
(ht : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ t y) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] y)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin (k + 1) f s) s y) :
HasDerivWithinAt
(fun z => (((k + 1 : ℝ) * k !)⁻¹ * (x - z) ^ (k + 1)) • iteratedDerivWithin (k + 1) f s z)
((((k + 1 : ℝ) * k !)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ (k + 1)) • iteratedDerivWithin (k + 2) f s y -
((k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ k) • iteratedDerivWithin (k + 1) f s y) t y := by
replace hf :
HasDerivWithinAt (iteratedDerivWithin (k + 1) f s) (iteratedDerivWithin (k + 2) f s y) t y := by
convert (hf.mono_of_mem hs).hasDerivWithinAt using 1
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_succ (ht.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr hs))]
exact (derivWithin_of_mem hs ht hf).symm
have : HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => ((k + 1 : ℝ) * k !)⁻¹ * (x - t) ^ (k + 1))
(-((k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ k)) t y := by
-- Commuting the factors:
have : -((k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ k) = ((k + 1 : ℝ) * k !)⁻¹ * (-(k + 1) * (x - y) ^ k) := by
field_simp; ring
rw [this]
exact (monomial_has_deriv_aux y x _).hasDerivWithinAt.const_mul _
convert this.smul hf using 1
field_simp
rw [neg_div, neg_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align has_deriv_within_at_taylor_coeff_within hasDerivWithinAt_taylor_coeff_within
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval {f : ℝ → E} {x y : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {s s' : Set ℝ}
(hs'_unique : UniqueDiffWithinAt ℝ s' y) (hs_unique : UniqueDiffOn ℝ s) (hs' : s' ∈ 𝓝[s] y)
(hy : y ∈ s') (h : s' ⊆ s) (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f s)
(hf' : DifferentiableWithinAt ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s y) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t => taylorWithinEval f n s t x)
(((n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s y) s' y := by
induction' n with k hk
· simp only [taylor_within_zero_eval, Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one, inv_one, pow_zero,
mul_one, zero_add, one_smul]
simp only [iteratedDerivWithin_zero] at hf'
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_one (hs_unique _ (h hy))]
exact hf'.hasDerivWithinAt.mono h
simp_rw [Nat.add_succ, taylorWithinEval_succ]
simp only [add_zero, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
have coe_lt_succ : (k : WithTop ℕ) < k.succ := Nat.cast_lt.2 k.lt_succ_self
have hdiff : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin k f s) s' :=
(hf.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin coe_lt_succ hs_unique).mono h
specialize hk hf.of_succ ((hdiff y hy).mono_of_mem hs')
convert hk.add (hasDerivWithinAt_taylor_coeff_within hs'_unique
(nhdsWithin_mono _ h self_mem_nhdsWithin) hf') using 1
exact (add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
#align has_deriv_within_at_taylor_within_eval hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval
theorem taylorWithinEval_hasDerivAt_Ioo {f : ℝ → E} {a b t : ℝ} (x : ℝ) {n : ℕ} (hx : a < b)
(ht : t ∈ Ioo a b) (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f (Icc a b))
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc a b)) (Ioo a b)) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => taylorWithinEval f n (Icc a b) y x)
(((n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - t) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) t) t :=
have h_nhds : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 t := isOpen_Ioo.mem_nhds ht
have h_nhds' : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[Icc a b] t := nhdsWithin_le_nhds h_nhds
(hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval (uniqueDiffWithinAt_Ioo ht) (uniqueDiffOn_Icc hx) h_nhds' ht
Ioo_subset_Icc_self hf <| (hf' t ht).mono_of_mem h_nhds').hasDerivAt h_nhds
#align taylor_within_eval_has_deriv_at_Ioo taylorWithinEval_hasDerivAt_Ioo
theorem hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval_at_Icc {f : ℝ → E} {a b t : ℝ} (x : ℝ) {n : ℕ}
(hx : a < b) (ht : t ∈ Icc a b) (hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f (Icc a b))
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc a b)) (Icc a b)) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => taylorWithinEval f n (Icc a b) y x)
(((n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - t) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) t) (Icc a b) t :=
hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval (uniqueDiffOn_Icc hx t ht) (uniqueDiffOn_Icc hx)
self_mem_nhdsWithin ht rfl.subset hf (hf' t ht)
#align has_deriv_within_taylor_within_eval_at_Icc hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval_at_Icc
theorem taylor_mean_remainder {f : ℝ → ℝ} {g g' : ℝ → ℝ} {x x₀ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hx : x₀ < x)
(hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f (Icc x₀ x))
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc x₀ x)) (Ioo x₀ x))
(gcont : ContinuousOn g (Icc x₀ x))
(gdiff : ∀ x_1 : ℝ, x_1 ∈ Ioo x₀ x → HasDerivAt g (g' x_1) x_1)
(g'_ne : ∀ x_1 : ℝ, x_1 ∈ Ioo x₀ x → g' x_1 ≠ 0) :
∃ x' ∈ Ioo x₀ x, f x - taylorWithinEval f n (Icc x₀ x) x₀ x =
((x - x') ^ n / n ! * (g x - g x₀) / g' x') • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc x₀ x) x' := by
-- We apply the mean value theorem
rcases exists_ratio_hasDerivAt_eq_ratio_slope (fun t => taylorWithinEval f n (Icc x₀ x) t x)
(fun t => ((n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - t) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc x₀ x) t) hx
(continuousOn_taylorWithinEval (uniqueDiffOn_Icc hx) hf)
(fun _ hy => taylorWithinEval_hasDerivAt_Ioo x hx hy hf hf') g g' gcont gdiff with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
use y, hy
-- The rest is simplifications and trivial calculations
simp only [taylorWithinEval_self] at h
rw [mul_comm, ← div_left_inj' (g'_ne y hy), mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (g'_ne y hy)] at h
rw [← h]
field_simp [g'_ne y hy]
ring
#align taylor_mean_remainder taylor_mean_remainder
theorem taylor_mean_remainder_lagrange {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x x₀ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hx : x₀ < x)
(hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f (Icc x₀ x))
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc x₀ x)) (Ioo x₀ x)) :
∃ x' ∈ Ioo x₀ x, f x - taylorWithinEval f n (Icc x₀ x) x₀ x =
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc x₀ x) x' * (x - x₀) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)! := by
have gcont : ContinuousOn (fun t : ℝ => (x - t) ^ (n + 1)) (Icc x₀ x) := by
refine Continuous.continuousOn ?_
exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_id').pow _ -- Porting note: was `continuity`
have xy_ne : ∀ y : ℝ, y ∈ Ioo x₀ x → (x - y) ^ n ≠ 0 := by
intro y hy
refine pow_ne_zero _ ?_
rw [mem_Ioo] at hy
rw [sub_ne_zero]
exact hy.2.ne'
have hg' : ∀ y : ℝ, y ∈ Ioo x₀ x → -(↑n + 1) * (x - y) ^ n ≠ 0 := fun y hy =>
mul_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.mpr (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero n)) (xy_ne y hy)
-- We apply the general theorem with g(t) = (x - t)^(n+1)
rcases taylor_mean_remainder hx hf hf' gcont (fun y _ => monomial_has_deriv_aux y x _) hg' with
⟨y, hy, h⟩
use y, hy
simp only [sub_self, zero_pow, Ne, Nat.succ_ne_zero, not_false_iff, zero_sub, mul_neg] at h
rw [h, neg_div, ← div_neg, neg_mul, neg_neg]
field_simp [xy_ne y hy, Nat.factorial]; ring
#align taylor_mean_remainder_lagrange taylor_mean_remainder_lagrange
theorem taylor_mean_remainder_cauchy {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x x₀ : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hx : x₀ < x)
(hf : ContDiffOn ℝ n f (Icc x₀ x))
(hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc x₀ x)) (Ioo x₀ x)) :
∃ x' ∈ Ioo x₀ x, f x - taylorWithinEval f n (Icc x₀ x) x₀ x =
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc x₀ x) x' * (x - x') ^ n / n ! * (x - x₀) := by
have gcont : ContinuousOn id (Icc x₀ x) := Continuous.continuousOn (by continuity)
have gdiff : ∀ x_1 : ℝ, x_1 ∈ Ioo x₀ x → HasDerivAt id ((fun _ : ℝ => (1 : ℝ)) x_1) x_1 :=
fun _ _ => hasDerivAt_id _
-- We apply the general theorem with g = id
rcases taylor_mean_remainder hx hf hf' gcont gdiff fun _ _ => by simp with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
use y, hy
rw [h]
field_simp [n.factorial_ne_zero]
ring
#align taylor_mean_remainder_cauchy taylor_mean_remainder_cauchy
theorem taylor_mean_remainder_bound {f : ℝ → E} {a b C x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b)
(hf : ContDiffOn ℝ (n + 1) f (Icc a b)) (hx : x ∈ Icc a b)
(hC : ∀ y ∈ Icc a b, ‖iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) y‖ ≤ C) :
‖f x - taylorWithinEval f n (Icc a b) a x‖ ≤ C * (x - a) ^ (n + 1) / n ! := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hab with (rfl | h)
· rw [Icc_self, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
-- The nth iterated derivative is differentiable
have hf' : DifferentiableOn ℝ (iteratedDerivWithin n f (Icc a b)) (Icc a b) :=
hf.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin (WithTop.coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self)
(uniqueDiffOn_Icc h)
-- We can uniformly bound the derivative of the Taylor polynomial
have h' : ∀ y ∈ Ico a x,
‖((n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * (x - y) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) y‖ ≤
(n ! : ℝ)⁻¹ * |x - a| ^ n * C := by
rintro y ⟨hay, hyx⟩
rw [norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
gcongr
· rw [abs_mul, abs_pow, abs_inv, Nat.abs_cast]
gcongr
exact sub_nonneg.2 hyx.le
-- Estimate the iterated derivative by `C`
· exact hC y ⟨hay, hyx.le.trans hx.2⟩
-- Apply the mean value theorem for vector valued functions:
have A : ∀ t ∈ Icc a x, HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => taylorWithinEval f n (Icc a b) y x)
(((↑n !)⁻¹ * (x - t) ^ n) • iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) t) (Icc a x) t := by
intro t ht
have I : Icc a x ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc_right hx.2
exact (hasDerivWithinAt_taylorWithinEval_at_Icc x h (I ht) hf.of_succ hf').mono I
have := norm_image_sub_le_of_norm_deriv_le_segment' A h' x (right_mem_Icc.2 hx.1)
simp only [taylorWithinEval_self] at this
refine this.trans_eq ?_
-- The rest is a trivial calculation
rw [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr hx.1)]
ring
#align taylor_mean_remainder_bound taylor_mean_remainder_bound
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Taylor.lean | 359 | 372 | theorem exists_taylor_mean_remainder_bound {f : ℝ → E} {a b : ℝ} {n : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b)
(hf : ContDiffOn ℝ (n + 1) f (Icc a b)) :
∃ C, ∀ x ∈ Icc a b, ‖f x - taylorWithinEval f n (Icc a b) a x‖ ≤ C * (x - a) ^ (n + 1) := by |
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hab with (rfl | h)
· refine ⟨0, fun x hx => ?_⟩
have : x = a := by simpa [← le_antisymm_iff] using hx
simp [← this]
-- We estimate by the supremum of the norm of the iterated derivative
let g : ℝ → ℝ := fun y => ‖iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f (Icc a b) y‖
use SupSet.sSup (g '' Icc a b) / (n !)
intro x hx
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div₀]
refine taylor_mean_remainder_bound hab hf hx fun y => ?_
exact (hf.continuousOn_iteratedDerivWithin rfl.le <| uniqueDiffOn_Icc h).norm.le_sSup_image_Icc
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Contraction
variable {R M : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable (Q)
def invertibleιOfInvertible (m : M) [Invertible (Q m)] : Invertible (ι Q m) where
invOf := ι Q (⅟ (Q m) • m)
invOf_mul_self := by
rw [map_smul, smul_mul_assoc, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul, invOf_mul_self, map_one]
mul_invOf_self := by
rw [map_smul, mul_smul_comm, ι_sq_scalar, Algebra.smul_def, ← map_mul, invOf_mul_self, map_one]
#align clifford_algebra.invertible_ι_of_invertible CliffordAlgebra.invertibleιOfInvertible
theorem invOf_ι (m : M) [Invertible (Q m)] [Invertible (ι Q m)] :
⅟ (ι Q m) = ι Q (⅟ (Q m) • m) := by
letI := invertibleιOfInvertible Q m
convert (rfl : ⅟ (ι Q m) = _)
#align clifford_algebra.inv_of_ι CliffordAlgebra.invOf_ι
theorem isUnit_ι_of_isUnit {m : M} (h : IsUnit (Q m)) : IsUnit (ι Q m) := by
cases h.nonempty_invertible
letI := invertibleιOfInvertible Q m
exact isUnit_of_invertible (ι Q m)
#align clifford_algebra.is_unit_ι_of_is_unit CliffordAlgebra.isUnit_ι_of_isUnit
theorem ι_mul_ι_mul_invOf_ι (a b : M) [Invertible (ι Q a)] [Invertible (Q a)] :
ι Q a * ι Q b * ⅟ (ι Q a) = ι Q ((⅟ (Q a) * QuadraticForm.polar Q a b) • a - b) := by
rw [invOf_ι, map_smul, mul_smul_comm, ι_mul_ι_mul_ι, ← map_smul, smul_sub, smul_smul, smul_smul,
invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
#align clifford_algebra.ι_mul_ι_mul_inv_of_ι CliffordAlgebra.ι_mul_ι_mul_invOf_ι
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Inversion.lean | 51 | 54 | theorem invOf_ι_mul_ι_mul_ι (a b : M) [Invertible (ι Q a)] [Invertible (Q a)] :
⅟ (ι Q a) * ι Q b * ι Q a = ι Q ((⅟ (Q a) * QuadraticForm.polar Q a b) • a - b) := by |
rw [invOf_ι, map_smul, smul_mul_assoc, smul_mul_assoc, ι_mul_ι_mul_ι, ← map_smul, smul_sub,
smul_smul, smul_smul, invOf_mul_self, one_smul]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.pigeonhole from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d6fad0e5bf2d6f48da9175d25c3dc5706b3834ce"
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {M : Type w} [DecidableEq β]
open Nat
namespace Finset
variable {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β} {w : α → M} {b : M} {n : ℕ}
section
variable [LinearOrderedCancelAddCommMonoid M]
theorem exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : t.card • b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt <| by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
#align finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum Finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum
theorem exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_maps_to_of_sum_lt_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x < t.card • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x < b :=
exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf hb
#align finset.exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_maps_to_of_sum_lt_nsmul Finset.exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_maps_to_of_sum_lt_nsmul
theorem exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x ≤ 0)
(hb : t.card • b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
exists_lt_of_sum_lt <|
calc
∑ _y ∈ t, b < ∑ x ∈ s, w x := by simpa
_ ≤ ∑ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos ht
#align finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum Finset.exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum
theorem exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
(ht : ∀ y ∉ t, (0 : M) ≤ ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x < t.card • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x < b :=
exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_lt_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) ht hb
#align finset.exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul Finset.exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
theorem exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht <| by simpa only [sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to hf, sum_const]
#align finset.exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum Finset.exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum
theorem exists_sum_fiber_le_of_maps_to_of_sum_le_nsmul (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x ≤ t.card • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x ≤ b :=
exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf ht hb
#align finset.exists_sum_fiber_le_of_maps_to_of_sum_le_nsmul Finset.exists_sum_fiber_le_of_maps_to_of_sum_le_nsmul
theorem exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x ≤ 0) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x) : ∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
exists_le_of_sum_le ht <|
calc
∑ _y ∈ t, b ≤ ∑ x ∈ s, w x := by simpa
_ ≤ ∑ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x :=
sum_le_sum_fiberwise_of_sum_fiber_nonpos hf
#align finset.exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum Finset.exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum
theorem exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul
(hf : ∀ y ∉ t, (0 : M) ≤ ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : ∑ x ∈ s, w x ≤ t.card • b) : ∃ y ∈ t, ∑ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x = y, w x ≤ b :=
exists_le_sum_fiber_of_sum_fiber_nonpos_of_nsmul_le_sum (M := Mᵒᵈ) hf ht hb
#align finset.exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul Finset.exists_sum_fiber_le_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_le_nsmul
end
variable [LinearOrderedCommSemiring M]
theorem exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(ht : t.card • b < s.card) : ∃ y ∈ t, b < (s.filter fun x => f x = y).card := by
simp_rw [cast_card] at ht ⊢
exact exists_lt_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_lt_sum hf ht
#align finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to Finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to
theorem exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t)
(hn : t.card * n < s.card) : ∃ y ∈ t, n < (s.filter fun x => f x = y).card :=
exists_lt_card_fiber_of_nsmul_lt_card_of_maps_to hf hn
#align finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to Finset.exists_lt_card_fiber_of_mul_lt_card_of_maps_to
theorem exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul (ht : ↑s.card < t.card • b) :
∃ y ∈ t, ↑(s.filter fun x => f x = y).card < b := by
simp_rw [cast_card] at ht ⊢
exact
exists_sum_fiber_lt_of_sum_fiber_nonneg_of_sum_lt_nsmul
(fun _ _ => sum_nonneg fun _ _ => zero_le_one) ht
#align finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul Finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul
theorem exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul (hn : s.card < t.card * n) :
∃ y ∈ t, (s.filter fun x => f x = y).card < n :=
exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_nsmul hn
#align finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul Finset.exists_card_fiber_lt_of_card_lt_mul
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Pigeonhole.lean | 272 | 275 | theorem exists_le_card_fiber_of_nsmul_le_card_of_maps_to (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ∈ t) (ht : t.Nonempty)
(hb : t.card • b ≤ s.card) : ∃ y ∈ t, b ≤ (s.filter fun x => f x = y).card := by |
simp_rw [cast_card] at hb ⊢
exact exists_le_sum_fiber_of_maps_to_of_nsmul_le_sum hf ht hb
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
#align_import topology.algebra.infinite_sum.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
open Filter Finset NNReal Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α}
theorem cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using fun n ↦ dist_nonneg.trans (hf n)
apply cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d (α := α) (f := f)
· exact_mod_cast hf
· exact_mod_cast hd
#align cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable
theorem cauchySeq_of_summable_dist (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h
#align cauchy_seq_of_summable_dist cauchySeq_of_summable_dist
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) := by
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha) (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨n, fun m hnm ↦ ?_⟩)
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
refine sum_le_tsum (range _) (fun _ _ ↦ le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) ?_
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
#align dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
#align dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n) : dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n + m)) (f (n + m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (fun x ↦ dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m) from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h ha n
#align dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
#align dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀
section summable
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Real.lean | 67 | 70 | theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by |
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
exact mod_cast NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.InjectiveResolution
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Additive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Homology
#align_import category_theory.abelian.right_derived from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"024a4231815538ac739f52d08dd20a55da0d6b23"
universe v u
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
[Abelian C] [HasInjectiveResolutions C] [Abelian D]
noncomputable def Functor.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
C ⥤ HomotopyCategory D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) :=
injectiveResolutions C ⋙ F.mapHomotopyCategory _
noncomputable def InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj {X : C}
(I : InjectiveResolution X) (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.obj X ≅
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).obj I.cocomplex :=
(F.mapHomotopyCategory _).mapIso I.iso ≪≫
(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors _).app I.cocomplex
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f ≫ (J.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom =
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ := by
dsimp [Functor.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory, isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj]
rw [← Functor.map_comp_assoc, iso_hom_naturality f I J φ comm, Functor.map_comp,
assoc, assoc]
erw [(F.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors (ComplexShape.up ℕ)).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv ≫ F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory.map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map φ ≫
(J.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
dsimp
rw [← isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality_assoc f I J φ comm F,
Iso.hom_inv_id, comp_id]
noncomputable def Functor.rightDerived (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) : C ⥤ D :=
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⋙ HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n
#align category_theory.functor.right_derived CategoryTheory.Functor.rightDerived
noncomputable def InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj {X : C} (I : InjectiveResolution X)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.rightDerived n).obj X ≅
(HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor D _ n).obj
((F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj I.cocomplex) :=
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctor D _ n).mapIso
(I.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F) ≪≫
(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) n).app _
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(F.rightDerived n).map f ≫ (J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom =
(I.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ := by
dsimp [isoRightDerivedObj, Functor.rightDerived]
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj_hom_naturality f I J φ comm F,
Functor.map_comp, assoc]
erw [(HomotopyCategory.homologyFunctorFactors D (ComplexShape.up ℕ) n).hom.naturality]
rfl
@[reassoc]
lemma InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_inv_naturality
{X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (I : InjectiveResolution X) (J : InjectiveResolution Y)
(φ : I.cocomplex ⟶ J.cocomplex) (comm : I.ι.f 0 ≫ φ.f 0 = f ≫ J.ι.f 0)
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
(I.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv ≫ (F.rightDerived n).map f =
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map φ ≫
(J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (J.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom, assoc, assoc,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality f I J φ comm F n,
Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
lemma Functor.isZero_rightDerived_obj_injective_succ
(F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) (X : C) [Injective X] :
IsZero ((F.rightDerived (n+1)).obj X) := by
refine IsZero.of_iso ?_ ((InjectiveResolution.self X).isoRightDerivedObj F (n + 1))
erw [← HomologicalComplex.exactAt_iff_isZero_homology]
exact ShortComplex.exact_of_isZero_X₂ _ (F.map_isZero (by apply isZero_zero))
theorem Functor.rightDerived_map_eq (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y)
{P : InjectiveResolution X} {Q : InjectiveResolution Y} (g : P.cocomplex ⟶ Q.cocomplex)
(w : P.ι ≫ g = (CochainComplex.single₀ C).map f ≫ Q.ι) :
(F.rightDerived n).map f =
(P.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom ≫
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _ ⋙ HomologicalComplex.homologyFunctor _ _ n).map g ≫
(Q.isoRightDerivedObj F n).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (Q.isoRightDerivedObj F n).hom,
InjectiveResolution.isoRightDerivedObj_hom_naturality f P Q g _ F n,
assoc, assoc, Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
rw [← HomologicalComplex.comp_f, w, HomologicalComplex.comp_f,
CochainComplex.single₀_map_f_zero]
#align category_theory.functor.right_derived_map_eq CategoryTheory.Functor.rightDerived_map_eq
noncomputable def NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) :
F.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory ⟶ G.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory :=
whiskerLeft _ (NatTrans.mapHomotopyCategory α (ComplexShape.up ℕ))
lemma InjectiveResolution.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_app_eq
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) {X : C} (P : InjectiveResolution X) :
(NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory α).app X =
(P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj F).hom ≫
(HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map
((NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α _).app P.cocomplex) ≫
(P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).inv := by
rw [← cancel_mono (P.isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj G).hom, assoc, assoc,
Iso.inv_hom_id, comp_id]
dsimp [isoRightDerivedToHomotopyCategoryObj, Functor.mapHomotopyCategoryFactors,
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory]
rw [assoc]
erw [id_comp, comp_id]
obtain ⟨β, hβ⟩ := (HomotopyCategory.quotient _ _).map_surjective (iso P).hom
rw [← hβ]
dsimp
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_id (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] :
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory (𝟙 F) = 𝟙 _ := rfl
@[simp, reassoc]
lemma NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_comp {F G H : C ⥤ D} (α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H)
[F.Additive] [G.Additive] [H.Additive] :
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory (α ≫ β) =
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory α ≫
NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory β := rfl
noncomputable def NatTrans.rightDerived
{F G : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] (α : F ⟶ G) (n : ℕ) :
F.rightDerived n ⟶ G.rightDerived n :=
whiskerRight (NatTrans.rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory α) _
#align category_theory.nat_trans.right_derived CategoryTheory.NatTrans.rightDerived
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.rightDerived_id (F : C ⥤ D) [F.Additive] (n : ℕ) :
NatTrans.rightDerived (𝟙 F) n = 𝟙 (F.rightDerived n) := by
dsimp only [rightDerived]
simp only [rightDerivedToHomotopyCategory_id, whiskerRight_id']
rfl
#align category_theory.nat_trans.right_derived_id CategoryTheory.NatTrans.rightDerived_id
@[simp, reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/RightDerived.lean | 227 | 230 | theorem NatTrans.rightDerived_comp {F G H : C ⥤ D} [F.Additive] [G.Additive] [H.Additive]
(α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) (n : ℕ) :
NatTrans.rightDerived (α ≫ β) n = NatTrans.rightDerived α n ≫ NatTrans.rightDerived β n := by |
simp [NatTrans.rightDerived]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.WithTop
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.ENNReal.Basic
#align_import data.real.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open Set NNReal ENNReal
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0}
section OperationsAndInfty
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp] theorem add_eq_top : a + b = ∞ ↔ a = ∞ ∨ b = ∞ := WithTop.add_eq_top
#align ennreal.add_eq_top ENNReal.add_eq_top
@[simp] theorem add_lt_top : a + b < ∞ ↔ a < ∞ ∧ b < ∞ := WithTop.add_lt_top
#align ennreal.add_lt_top ENNReal.add_lt_top
theorem toNNReal_add {r₁ r₂ : ℝ≥0∞} (h₁ : r₁ ≠ ∞) (h₂ : r₂ ≠ ∞) :
(r₁ + r₂).toNNReal = r₁.toNNReal + r₂.toNNReal := by
lift r₁ to ℝ≥0 using h₁
lift r₂ to ℝ≥0 using h₂
rfl
#align ennreal.to_nnreal_add ENNReal.toNNReal_add
theorem not_lt_top {x : ℝ≥0∞} : ¬x < ∞ ↔ x = ∞ := by rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Classical.not_not]
#align ennreal.not_lt_top ENNReal.not_lt_top
theorem add_ne_top : a + b ≠ ∞ ↔ a ≠ ∞ ∧ b ≠ ∞ := by simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using add_lt_top
#align ennreal.add_ne_top ENNReal.add_ne_top
theorem mul_top' : a * ∞ = if a = 0 then 0 else ∞ := by convert WithTop.mul_top' a
#align ennreal.mul_top ENNReal.mul_top'
-- Porting note: added because `simp` no longer uses `WithTop` lemmas for `ℝ≥0∞`
@[simp] theorem mul_top (h : a ≠ 0) : a * ∞ = ∞ := WithTop.mul_top h
theorem top_mul' : ∞ * a = if a = 0 then 0 else ∞ := by convert WithTop.top_mul' a
#align ennreal.top_mul ENNReal.top_mul'
-- Porting note: added because `simp` no longer uses `WithTop` lemmas for `ℝ≥0∞`
@[simp] theorem top_mul (h : a ≠ 0) : ∞ * a = ∞ := WithTop.top_mul h
theorem top_mul_top : ∞ * ∞ = ∞ := WithTop.top_mul_top
#align ennreal.top_mul_top ENNReal.top_mul_top
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: assume `n ≠ 0` instead of `0 < n`
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `WithTop`
theorem top_pow {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) : ∞ ^ n = ∞ :=
Nat.le_induction (pow_one _) (fun m _ hm => by rw [pow_succ, hm, top_mul_top]) _
(Nat.succ_le_of_lt h)
#align ennreal.top_pow ENNReal.top_pow
theorem mul_eq_top : a * b = ∞ ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b = ∞ ∨ a = ∞ ∧ b ≠ 0 :=
WithTop.mul_eq_top_iff
#align ennreal.mul_eq_top ENNReal.mul_eq_top
theorem mul_lt_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b < ∞ := WithTop.mul_lt_top
#align ennreal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.mul_lt_top
| Mathlib/Data/ENNReal/Operations.lean | 235 | 235 | theorem mul_ne_top : a ≠ ∞ → b ≠ ∞ → a * b ≠ ∞ := by | simpa only [lt_top_iff_ne_top] using mul_lt_top
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by
ext p
simp
#align nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset Nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset
theorem multiplicity_eq_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
multiplicity p n = n.factorization p := by
simp [factorization, pp, padicValNat_def' pp.ne_one hn.bot_lt]
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization Nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization
@[simp]
theorem factorization_prod_pow_eq_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization.prod (· ^ ·) = n := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp only [← prod_toMultiset, factorization, Multiset.prod_coe, Multiset.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
exact prod_factors hn
#align nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self
theorem eq_of_factorization_eq {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ p : ℕ, a.factorization p = b.factorization p) : a = b :=
eq_of_perm_factors ha hb (by simpa only [List.perm_iff_count, factors_count_eq] using h)
#align nat.eq_of_factorization_eq Nat.eq_of_factorization_eq
theorem factorization_inj : Set.InjOn factorization { x : ℕ | x ≠ 0 } := fun a ha b hb h =>
eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => by simp [h]
#align nat.factorization_inj Nat.factorization_inj
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero : factorization 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_zero Nat.factorization_zero
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one : factorization 1 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_one Nat.factorization_one
#noalign nat.support_factorization
#align nat.factor_iff_mem_factorization Nat.mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factorization Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factorization Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.le_of_mem_factorization Nat.le_of_mem_primeFactors
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff (n p : ℕ) :
n.factorization p = 0 ↔ ¬p.Prime ∨ ¬p ∣ n ∨ n = 0 := by
simp_rw [← not_mem_support_iff, support_factorization, mem_primeFactors, not_and_or, not_ne_iff]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = 0 := by simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 143 | 144 | theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : n.factorization p = 0 := by |
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, h]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T]
def bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval f
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁ MvPolynomial.bind₁
def bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S :=
eval₂Hom f X
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂ MvPolynomial.bind₂
def join₁ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval id
#align mv_polynomial.join₁ MvPolynomial.join₁
def join₂ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R) →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X
#align mv_polynomial.join₂ MvPolynomial.join₂
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : aeval f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_eq_bind₁ MvPolynomial.aeval_eq_bind₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : eval₂Hom C f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_C_eq_bind₁ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : eval₂Hom f X = bind₂ f :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_eq_bind₂ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂
section
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_id_eq_join₁ : aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_id_eq_join₁ MvPolynomial.aeval_id_eq_join₁
theorem eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂Hom C id φ = join₁ φ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_C_id_eq_join₁ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂ : eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_id_X_eq_join₂ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
attribute [-simp]
aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁_X_right MvPolynomial.bind₁_X_right
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂Hom_X' f X i
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_X_right MvPolynomial.bind₂_X_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Monad.lean | 160 | 162 | theorem bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) = AlgHom.id R _ := by |
ext1 i
simp
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
open Finset Matrix
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type*} (R : Type*)
variable [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
def degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := Matrix.diagonal (G.degree ·)
def lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : Matrix V V R := G.degMatrix R - G.adjMatrix R
variable {R}
theorem isSymm_degMatrix [AddMonoidWithOne R] : (G.degMatrix R).IsSymm :=
isSymm_diagonal _
theorem isSymm_lapMatrix [AddGroupWithOne R] : (G.lapMatrix R).IsSymm :=
(isSymm_degMatrix _).sub (isSymm_adjMatrix _)
theorem degMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocSemiring R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.degMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v := by
rw [degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_apply [NonAssocRing R] (v : V) (vec : V → R) :
(G.lapMatrix R *ᵥ vec) v = G.degree v * vec v - ∑ u ∈ G.neighborFinset v, vec u := by
simp_rw [lapMatrix, sub_mulVec, Pi.sub_apply, degMatrix_mulVec_apply, adjMatrix_mulVec_apply]
theorem lapMatrix_mulVec_const_eq_zero [Ring R] : mulVec (G.lapMatrix R) (fun _ ↦ 1) = 0 := by
ext1 i
rw [lapMatrix_mulVec_apply]
simp
theorem dotProduct_mulVec_degMatrix [CommRing R] (x : V → R) :
x ⬝ᵥ (G.degMatrix R *ᵥ x) = ∑ i : V, G.degree i * x i * x i := by
simp only [dotProduct, degMatrix, mulVec_diagonal, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm]
variable (R)
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/LapMatrix.lean | 67 | 70 | theorem degree_eq_sum_if_adj [AddCommMonoidWithOne R] (i : V) :
(G.degree i : R) = ∑ j : V, if G.Adj i j then 1 else 0 := by |
unfold degree neighborFinset neighborSet
rw [sum_boole, Set.toFinset_setOf]
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.QuasiSeparated
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.quasi_separated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1a51edf13debfcbe223fa06b1cb353b9ed9751cc"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparated (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
diagonalQuasiCompact : QuasiCompact (pullback.diagonal f) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated
def QuasiSeparated.affineProperty : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ _ _ =>
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ ∀ U V : X.affineOpens, IsCompact (U ∩ V : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
constructor
· intro H U V; exact H U V U.1.2 U.2.isCompact V.1.2 V.2.isCompact
· intro H
suffices
∀ (U : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact U.1) (V : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact V.1),
IsCompact (U ⊓ V).1
by intro U V hU hU' hV hV'; exact this ⟨U, hU⟩ hU' ⟨V, hV⟩ hV'
intro U hU V hV
-- Porting note: it complains "unable to find motive", but telling Lean that motive is
-- underscore is actually sufficient, weird
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) V hV
· simp
· intro S _ V hV
change IsCompact (U.1 ∩ (S.1 ∪ V.1))
rw [Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
apply hV.union
clear hV
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) U hU
· simp
· intro S _ W hW
change IsCompact ((S.1 ∪ W.1) ∩ V.1)
rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
apply hW.union
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine]
constructor
· intro H U V
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
haveI : IsAffine _ := V.2
let g : pullback (X.ofRestrict U.1.openEmbedding) (X.ofRestrict V.1.openEmbedding) ⟶ X :=
pullback.fst ≫ X.ofRestrict _
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
erw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe] at e
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
exact @Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _ (H _ _) e
· introv H h₁ h₂
let g : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ X := pullback.fst ≫ f₁
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
simp_rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at H
exact
@Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _
(H ⟨⟨_, h₁.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩)
e.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_iff_quasi_separated_space AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact :
@QuasiSeparated = MorphismProperty.diagonal @QuasiCompact := by ext; exact quasiSeparated_iff _
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_diagonal_is_quasi_compact AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq :
QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal = QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
funext; rw [quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_diagonal_eq AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact, quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty]
exact
diagonal_targetAffineLocally_eq_targetAffineLocally _ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property_diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal, quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty
theorem QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal : QuasiSeparated.affineProperty.IsLocal :=
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq ▸ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal
instance (priority := 900) quasiSeparatedOfMono {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
QuasiSeparated f where
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_of_mono AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedOfMono
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
(MorphismProperty.diagonal_isStableUnderComposition
quasiCompact_respectsIso quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange)
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_composition AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition
theorem quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange :
MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange.diagonal quasiCompact_respectsIso
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_base_change AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange
instance quasiSeparatedComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f]
[QuasiSeparated g] : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedComp
theorem quasiSeparated_respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ quasiCompact_respectsIso.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_respectsIso
open List in
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiSeparated.lean | 169 | 186 | theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f g).carrier,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)) (𝒰' :
∀ i : 𝒰.J, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) (_ :
∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)),
∀ (i : 𝒰.J) (j k : (𝒰' i).J),
CompactSpace (pullback ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).carrier] := by |
have := QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f
simp_rw [← quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty, ← quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact,
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq] at this
exact this
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
#align ordinal.is_limit_add_iff Ordinal.isLimit_add_iff
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_add_iff Ordinal.dvd_add_iff
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
#align ordinal.div_mul_cancel Ordinal.div_mul_cancel
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
#align ordinal.le_of_dvd Ordinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
#align ordinal.dvd_antisymm Ordinal.dvd_antisymm
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.mod_def Ordinal.mod_def
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
#align ordinal.mod_le Ordinal.mod_le
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_zero Ordinal.mod_zero
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt Ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
#align ordinal.zero_mod Ordinal.zero_mod
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
#align ordinal.div_add_mod Ordinal.div_add_mod
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
#align ordinal.mod_lt Ordinal.mod_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_self Ordinal.mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_one Ordinal.mod_one
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
#align ordinal.mul_add_mod_self Ordinal.mul_add_mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
#align ordinal.mul_mod Ordinal.mul_mod
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
#align ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
#align ordinal.mod_mod Ordinal.mod_mod
def bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
∀ a < type r, α := fun a ha => f (enum r a ha)
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'
def bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} : (ι → α) → ∀ a < type (@WellOrderingRel ι), α :=
bfamilyOfFamily' WellOrderingRel
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily
def familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, α) : ι → α := fun i =>
f (typein r i)
(by
rw [← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i)
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'
def familyOfBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : o.out.α → α :=
familyOfBFamily' (· < ·) (type_lt o) f
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily Ordinal.familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily'_typein {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily' r f (typein r i) (typein_lt_type r i) = f i := by
simp only [bfamilyOfFamily', enum_typein]
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family'_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'_typein
@[simp]
theorem bfamilyOfFamily_typein {ι} (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily f (typein _ i) (typein_lt_type _ i) = f i :=
bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ f i
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family_typein Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily_typein
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily'_enum {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily' r ho f (enum r i (by rwa [ho])) = f i hi := by
simp only [familyOfBFamily', typein_enum]
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily'_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'_enum
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem familyOfBFamily_enum (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) :
familyOfBFamily o f
(enum (· < ·) i
(by
convert hi
exact type_lt _)) =
f i hi :=
familyOfBFamily'_enum _ (type_lt o) f _ _
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily_enum Ordinal.familyOfBFamily_enum
def brange (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : Set α :=
{ a | ∃ i hi, f i hi = a }
#align ordinal.brange Ordinal.brange
theorem mem_brange {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, α} {a} : a ∈ brange o f ↔ ∃ i hi, f i hi = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordinal.mem_brange Ordinal.mem_brange
theorem mem_brange_self {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (i hi) : f i hi ∈ brange o f :=
⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
#align ordinal.mem_brange_self Ordinal.mem_brange_self
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = brange o f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
apply mem_brange_self
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, familyOfBFamily'_enum _ _ _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily'
@[simp]
theorem range_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) : range (familyOfBFamily o f) = brange o f :=
range_familyOfBFamily' _ _ f
#align ordinal.range_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.range_familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = range f := by
refine Set.ext fun a => ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, _, bfamilyOfFamily'_typein _ _ _⟩
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily'
@[simp]
theorem brange_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) : brange _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = range f :=
brange_bfamilyOfFamily' _ _
#align ordinal.brange_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.brange_bfamilyOfFamily
@[simp]
theorem brange_const {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) {c : α} : (brange o fun _ _ => c) = {c} := by
rw [← range_familyOfBFamily]
exact @Set.range_const _ o.out.α (out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho) c
#align ordinal.brange_const Ordinal.brange_const
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α)
(g : α → β) : (fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily' r f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily' r (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily'
theorem comp_bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} (f : ι → α) (g : α → β) :
(fun i hi => g (bfamilyOfFamily f i hi)) = bfamilyOfFamily (g ∘ f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_bfamily_of_family Ordinal.comp_bfamilyOfFamily
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o}
(ho : type r = o) (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily' r ho f = familyOfBFamily' r ho fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily'
theorem comp_familyOfBFamily {o} (f : ∀ a < o, α) (g : α → β) :
g ∘ familyOfBFamily o f = familyOfBFamily o fun i hi => g (f i hi) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.comp_family_of_bfamily Ordinal.comp_familyOfBFamily
-- Porting note: Universes should be specified in `sup`s.
def sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
iSup f
#align ordinal.sup Ordinal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sSup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sSup (Set.range f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sSup_eq_sup
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨(iSup (succ ∘ card ∘ f)).ord, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact le_of_lt (Cardinal.lt_ord.2 ((lt_succ _).trans_le
(le_ciSup (Cardinal.bddAbove_range.{_, v} _) _)))⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_range Ordinal.bddAbove_range
theorem le_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : ∀ i, f i ≤ sup.{_, v} f := fun i =>
le_csSup (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f) (mem_range_self i)
#align ordinal.le_sup Ordinal.le_sup
theorem sup_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : sup.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range.{_, v} f)).trans (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_le_iff Ordinal.sup_le_iff
theorem sup_le {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : (∀ i, f i ≤ a) → sup.{_, v} f ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.sup_le Ordinal.sup_le
theorem lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} : a < sup.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a < f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@sup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_sup Ordinal.lt_sup
theorem ne_sup_iff_lt_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) ↔ ∀ i, f i < sup.{_, v} f :=
⟨fun hf _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf _), fun hf _ => ne_of_lt (hf _)⟩
#align ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup Ordinal.ne_sup_iff_lt_sup
theorem sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ sup.{_, v} f) {a} (hao : a < sup.{_, v} f) : succ a < sup.{_, v} f := by
by_contra! hoa
exact
hao.not_le (sup_le fun i => le_of_lt_succ <| (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_sup _ _) (hf i)).trans_le hoa)
#align ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup Ordinal.sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_zero_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} :
sup.{_, v} f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (sup_le fun i => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_sup f i
#align ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.sup_eq_zero_iff
theorem IsNormal.sup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f) {ι : Type u}
(g : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) [Nonempty ι] : f (sup.{_, v} g) = sup.{_, w} (f ∘ g) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [sup_le_iff]; simp only [comp]; rw [H.le_set' Set.univ Set.univ_nonempty g] <;>
simp [sup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.sup Ordinal.IsNormal.sup
@[simp]
theorem sup_empty {ι} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align ordinal.sup_empty Ordinal.sup_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_const {ι} [_hι : Nonempty ι] (o : Ordinal) : (sup fun _ : ι => o) = o :=
ciSup_const
#align ordinal.sup_const Ordinal.sup_const
@[simp]
theorem sup_unique {ι} [Unique ι] (f : ι → Ordinal) : sup f = f default :=
ciSup_unique
#align ordinal.sup_unique Ordinal.sup_unique
theorem sup_le_of_range_subset {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f ⊆ Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f ≤ sup.{v, max u w} g :=
sup_le fun i =>
match h (mem_range_self i) with
| ⟨_j, hj⟩ => hj ▸ le_sup _ _
#align ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset Ordinal.sup_le_of_range_subset
theorem sup_eq_of_range_eq {ι ι'} {f : ι → Ordinal} {g : ι' → Ordinal}
(h : Set.range f = Set.range g) : sup.{u, max v w} f = sup.{v, max u w} g :=
(sup_le_of_range_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (sup_le_of_range_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq Ordinal.sup_eq_of_range_eq
@[simp]
theorem sup_sum {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : Sum α β → Ordinal) :
sup.{max u v, w} f =
max (sup.{u, max v w} fun a => f (Sum.inl a)) (sup.{v, max u w} fun b => f (Sum.inr b)) := by
apply (sup_le_iff.2 _).antisymm (max_le_iff.2 ⟨_, _⟩)
· rintro (i | i)
· exact le_max_of_le_left (le_sup _ i)
· exact le_max_of_le_right (le_sup _ i)
all_goals
apply sup_le_of_range_subset.{_, max u v, w}
rintro i ⟨a, rfl⟩
apply mem_range_self
#align ordinal.sup_sum Ordinal.sup_sum
theorem unbounded_range_of_sup_ge {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β → α)
(h : type r ≤ sup.{u, u} (typein r ∘ f)) : Unbounded r (range f) :=
(not_bounded_iff _).1 fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
not_lt_of_le h <|
lt_of_le_of_lt
(sup_le fun y => le_of_lt <| (typein_lt_typein r).2 <| hx _ <| mem_range_self y)
(typein_lt_type r x)
#align ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge Ordinal.unbounded_range_of_sup_ge
theorem le_sup_shrink_equiv {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) (a) (ha : a ∈ s) :
a ≤ sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val := by
convert le_sup.{u, u} (fun x => ((@equivShrink s hs).symm x).val) ((@equivShrink s hs) ⟨a, ha⟩)
rw [symm_apply_apply]
#align ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv Ordinal.le_sup_shrink_equiv
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio o) :=
let f : o.out.α → Set.Iio o :=
fun x => ⟨typein ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
let hf : Surjective f := fun b =>
⟨enum (· < ·) b.val
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact b.prop),
Subtype.ext (typein_enum _ _)⟩
small_of_surjective hf
#align ordinal.small_Iio Ordinal.small_Iio
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_succ]
infer_instance
#align ordinal.small_Iic Ordinal.small_Iic
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => small_subset <| show s ⊆ Iic a from fun _x hx => h hx, fun h =>
⟨sup.{u, u} fun x => ((@equivShrink s h).symm x).val, le_sup_shrink_equiv h⟩⟩
#align ordinal.bdd_above_iff_small Ordinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Ordinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align ordinal.bdd_above_of_small Ordinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem sup_eq_sSup {s : Set Ordinal.{u}} (hs : Small.{u} s) :
(sup.{u, u} fun x => (@equivShrink s hs).symm x) = sSup s :=
let hs' := bddAbove_iff_small.2 hs
((csSup_le_iff' hs').2 (le_sup_shrink_equiv hs)).antisymm'
(sup_le fun _x => le_csSup hs' (Subtype.mem _))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_Sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sSup
theorem sSup_ord {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} (hs : BddAbove s) : (sSup s).ord = sSup (ord '' s) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
rw [csSup_le_iff'
(bddAbove_iff_small.2 (@small_image _ _ _ s (Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small.1 hs))),
ord_le, csSup_le_iff' hs]
simp [ord_le]
#align ordinal.Sup_ord Ordinal.sSup_ord
theorem iSup_ord {ι} {f : ι → Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
(iSup f).ord = ⨆ i, (f i).ord := by
unfold iSup
convert sSup_ord hf
-- Porting note: `change` is required.
conv_lhs => change range (ord ∘ f)
rw [range_comp]
#align ordinal.supr_ord Ordinal.iSup_ord
private theorem sup_le_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop)
[IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) ≤ sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_le fun i => by
cases'
typein_surj r'
(by
rw [ho', ← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i) with
j hj
simp_rw [familyOfBFamily', ← hj]
apply le_sup
theorem sup_eq_sup {ι ι' : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) (r' : ι' → ι' → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r]
[IsWellOrder ι' r'] {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : type r = o) (ho' : type r' = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r' ho' f) :=
sup_eq_of_range_eq.{u, u, v} (by simp)
#align ordinal.sup_eq_sup Ordinal.sup_eq_sup
def bsup (o : Ordinal.{u}) (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : Ordinal.{max u v} :=
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.bsup Ordinal.bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_bsup' {o : Ordinal.{u}} {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} (familyOfBFamily' r ho f) = bsup.{_, v} o f :=
sup_eq_sup r _ ho _ f
#align ordinal.sup_eq_bsup' Ordinal.sup_eq_bsup'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
theorem sSup_eq_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sSup (brange o f) = bsup.{_, v} o f := by
congr
rw [range_familyOfBFamily]
#align ordinal.Sup_eq_bsup Ordinal.sSup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = sup.{_, v} f := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [← sup_eq_bsup' r, enum_typein,
familyOfBFamily', bfamilyOfFamily']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup' Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup'
theorem bsup_eq_bsup {ι : Type u} (r r' : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] [IsWellOrder ι r']
(f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r f) = bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily' r' f) := by
rw [bsup_eq_sup', bsup_eq_sup']
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup Ordinal.bsup_eq_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_sup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
bsup.{_, v} _ (bfamilyOfFamily f) = sup.{_, v} f :=
bsup_eq_sup' _ f
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_sup Ordinal.bsup_eq_sup
@[congr]
theorem bsup_congr {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o₁, Ordinal.{max u v}) (ho : o₁ = o₂) :
bsup.{_, v} o₁ f = bsup.{_, v} o₂ fun a h => f a (h.trans_eq ho.symm) := by
subst ho
-- Porting note: `rfl` is required.
rfl
#align ordinal.bsup_congr Ordinal.bsup_congr
theorem bsup_le_iff {o f a} : bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i h, f i h ≤ a :=
sup_le_iff.trans
⟨fun h i hi => by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
exact h _, fun h i => h _ _⟩
#align ordinal.bsup_le_iff Ordinal.bsup_le_iff
theorem bsup_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal} {a} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≤ a) → bsup.{u, v} o f ≤ a :=
bsup_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.bsup_le Ordinal.bsup_le
theorem le_bsup {o} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal) (i h) : f i h ≤ bsup o f :=
bsup_le_iff.1 le_rfl _ _
#align ordinal.le_bsup Ordinal.le_bsup
theorem lt_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} (f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}) {a} :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f ↔ ∃ i hi, a < f i hi := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_le] using not_congr (@bsup_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup
theorem IsNormal.bsup {f : Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u w}} (H : IsNormal f)
{o : Ordinal.{u}} :
∀ (g : ∀ a < o, Ordinal), o ≠ 0 → f (bsup.{_, v} o g) = bsup.{_, w} o fun a h => f (g a h) :=
inductionOn o fun α r _ g h => by
haveI := type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.1 h
rw [← sup_eq_bsup' r, IsNormal.sup.{_, v, w} H, ← sup_eq_bsup' r] <;> rfl
#align ordinal.is_normal.bsup Ordinal.IsNormal.bsup
theorem lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}} :
(∀ i h, f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) ↔ ∀ i h, f i h < bsup.{_, v} o f :=
⟨fun hf _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne (le_bsup _ _ _) (hf _ _), fun hf _ _ => ne_of_lt (hf _ _)⟩
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_ne_bsup
theorem bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal.{max u v}}
(hf : ∀ {i : Ordinal} (h : i < o), f i h ≠ bsup.{_, v} o f) (a) :
a < bsup.{_, v} o f → succ a < bsup.{_, v} o f := by
rw [← sup_eq_bsup] at *
exact sup_not_succ_of_ne_sup fun i => hf _
#align ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup Ordinal.bsup_not_succ_of_ne_bsup
@[simp]
theorem bsup_eq_zero_iff {o} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} : bsup o f = 0 ↔ ∀ i hi, f i hi = 0 := by
refine
⟨fun h i hi => ?_, fun h =>
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun i hi => Ordinal.le_zero.2 (h i hi)) (Ordinal.zero_le _)⟩
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← h]
exact le_bsup f i hi
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.bsup_eq_zero_iff
theorem lt_bsup_of_limit {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {a a'} (ha : a < o) (ha' : a' < o), a < a' → f a ha < f a' ha')
(ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) (i h) : f i h < bsup o f :=
(hf _ _ <| lt_succ i).trans_le (le_bsup f (succ i) <| ho _ h)
#align ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit Ordinal.lt_bsup_of_limit
theorem bsup_succ_of_mono {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ a < succ o, Ordinal}
(hf : ∀ {i j} (hi hj), i ≤ j → f i hi ≤ f j hj) : bsup _ f = f o (lt_succ o) :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _i hi => hf _ _ <| le_of_lt_succ hi) (le_bsup _ _ _)
#align ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono Ordinal.bsup_succ_of_mono
@[simp]
theorem bsup_zero (f : ∀ a < (0 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 0 f = 0 :=
bsup_eq_zero_iff.2 fun i hi => (Ordinal.not_lt_zero i hi).elim
#align ordinal.bsup_zero Ordinal.bsup_zero
theorem bsup_const {o : Ordinal.{u}} (ho : o ≠ 0) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
(bsup.{_, v} o fun _ _ => a) = a :=
le_antisymm (bsup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) (le_bsup _ 0 (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho))
#align ordinal.bsup_const Ordinal.bsup_const
@[simp]
theorem bsup_one (f : ∀ a < (1 : Ordinal), Ordinal) : bsup 1 f = f 0 zero_lt_one := by
simp_rw [← sup_eq_bsup, sup_unique, familyOfBFamily, familyOfBFamily', typein_one_out]
#align ordinal.bsup_one Ordinal.bsup_one
theorem bsup_le_of_brange_subset {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f ⊆ brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f ≤ bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
bsup_le fun i hi => by
obtain ⟨j, hj, hj'⟩ := h ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩
rw [← hj']
apply le_bsup
#align ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset Ordinal.bsup_le_of_brange_subset
theorem bsup_eq_of_brange_eq {o o'} {f : ∀ a < o, Ordinal} {g : ∀ a < o', Ordinal}
(h : brange o f = brange o' g) : bsup.{u, max v w} o f = bsup.{v, max u w} o' g :=
(bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{u, v, w} h.le).antisymm (bsup_le_of_brange_subset.{v, u, w} h.ge)
#align ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq Ordinal.bsup_eq_of_brange_eq
def lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (succ ∘ f)
#align ordinal.lsub Ordinal.lsub
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} (succ ∘ f) = lsub.{_, v} f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub
theorem lsub_le_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ a ↔ ∀ i, f i < a := by
convert sup_le_iff.{_, v} (f := succ ∘ f) (a := a) using 2
-- Porting note: `comp_apply` is required.
simp only [comp_apply, succ_le_iff]
#align ordinal.lsub_le_iff Ordinal.lsub_le_iff
theorem lsub_le {ι} {f : ι → Ordinal} {a} : (∀ i, f i < a) → lsub f ≤ a :=
lsub_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.lsub_le Ordinal.lsub_le
theorem lt_lsub {ι} (f : ι → Ordinal) (i) : f i < lsub f :=
succ_le_iff.1 (le_sup _ i)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub Ordinal.lt_lsub
theorem lt_lsub_iff {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}} {a} :
a < lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, a ≤ f i := by
simpa only [not_forall, not_lt, not_le] using not_congr (@lsub_le_iff.{_, v} _ f a)
#align ordinal.lt_lsub_iff Ordinal.lt_lsub_iff
theorem sup_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) : sup.{_, v} f ≤ lsub.{_, v} f :=
sup_le fun i => (lt_lsub f i).le
#align ordinal.sup_le_lsub Ordinal.sup_le_lsub
theorem lsub_le_sup_succ {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
lsub.{_, v} f ≤ succ (sup.{_, v} f) :=
lsub_le fun i => lt_succ_iff.2 (le_sup f i)
#align ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ Ordinal.lsub_le_sup_succ
theorem sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
sup.{_, v} f = lsub.{_, v} f ∨ succ (sup.{_, v} f) = lsub.{_, v} f := by
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (sup_le_lsub.{_, v} f) with h h
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ((succ_le_of_lt h).antisymm (lsub_le_sup_succ f))
#align ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub Ordinal.sup_eq_lsub_or_sup_succ_eq_lsub
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,620 | 1,627 | theorem sup_succ_le_lsub {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v}) :
succ (sup.{_, v} f) ≤ lsub.{_, v} f ↔ ∃ i, f i = sup.{_, v} f := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_contra! hf
exact (succ_le_iff.1 h).ne ((sup_le_lsub f).antisymm (lsub_le (ne_sup_iff_lt_sup.1 hf)))
rintro ⟨_, hf⟩
rw [succ_le_iff, ← hf]
exact lt_lsub _ _
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.OpenImmersion
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Composition
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
class IsClosedImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
base_closed : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base
surj_on_stalks : ∀ x, Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x)
namespace IsClosedImmersion
lemma closedEmbedding {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] : ClosedEmbedding f.1.base :=
IsClosedImmersion.base_closed
lemma surjective_stalkMap {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[IsClosedImmersion f] (x : X) : Function.Surjective (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x) :=
IsClosedImmersion.surj_on_stalks x
instance {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsClosedImmersion f where
base_closed := Homeomorph.closedEmbedding <| TopCat.homeoOfIso (asIso f.1.base)
surj_on_stalks := fun _ ↦ (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso _).2
instance : MorphismProperty.IsMultiplicative @IsClosedImmersion where
id_mem _ := inferInstance
comp_mem {X Y Z} f g hf hg := by
refine ⟨hg.base_closed.comp hf.base_closed, fun x ↦ ?_⟩
erw [PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp]
exact (hf.surj_on_stalks x).comp (hg.surj_on_stalks (f.1.1 x))
instance comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsClosedImmersion f]
[IsClosedImmersion g] : IsClosedImmersion (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition.comp_mem f g inferInstance inferInstance
lemma respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @IsClosedImmersion := by
constructor <;> intro X Y Z e f hf <;> infer_instance
theorem spec_of_surjective {R S : CommRingCat} (f : R ⟶ S) (h : Function.Surjective f) :
IsClosedImmersion (Scheme.specMap f) where
base_closed := PrimeSpectrum.closedEmbedding_comap_of_surjective _ _ h
surj_on_stalks x := by
erw [← localRingHom_comp_stalkIso, CommRingCat.coe_comp, CommRingCat.coe_comp]
apply Function.Surjective.comp (Function.Surjective.comp _ _) _
· exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso (StructureSheaf.stalkIso S x).inv).2
· exact surjective_localRingHom_of_surjective f h x.asIdeal
· let g := (StructureSheaf.stalkIso ((CommRingCat.of R))
((PrimeSpectrum.comap (CommRingCat.ofHom f)) x)).hom
exact (ConcreteCategory.bijective_of_isIso g).2
instance spec_of_quotient_mk {R : CommRingCat.{u}} (I : Ideal R) :
IsClosedImmersion (Scheme.specMap (CommRingCat.ofHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I))) :=
spec_of_surjective _ Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/ClosedImmersion.lean | 98 | 112 | theorem of_comp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsClosedImmersion g]
[IsClosedImmersion (f ≫ g)] : IsClosedImmersion f where
base_closed := by |
have h := closedEmbedding (f ≫ g)
rw [Scheme.comp_val_base] at h
apply closedEmbedding_of_continuous_injective_closed (Scheme.Hom.continuous f)
· exact Function.Injective.of_comp h.inj
· intro Z hZ
rw [ClosedEmbedding.closed_iff_image_closed (closedEmbedding g),
← Set.image_comp]
exact ClosedEmbedding.isClosedMap h _ hZ
surj_on_stalks x := by
have h := surjective_stalkMap (f ≫ g) x
erw [Scheme.comp_val, PresheafedSpace.stalkMap.comp] at h
exact Function.Surjective.of_comp h
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped Real Topology ComplexConjugate
-- Porting note: @[pp_nodot] does not exist in mathlib4
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ :=
x.abs.log + arg x * I
#align complex.log Complex.log
theorem log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_re Complex.log_re
theorem log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_im Complex.log_im
theorem neg_pi_lt_log_im (x : ℂ) : -π < (log x).im := by simp only [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg]
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im Complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im
theorem log_im_le_pi (x : ℂ) : (log x).im ≤ π := by simp only [log_im, arg_le_pi]
#align complex.log_im_le_pi Complex.log_im_le_pi
theorem exp_log {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : exp (log x) = x := by
rw [log, exp_add_mul_I, ← ofReal_sin, sin_arg, ← ofReal_cos, cos_arg hx, ← ofReal_exp,
Real.exp_log (abs.pos hx), mul_add, ofReal_div, ofReal_div,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), ← mul_assoc,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ofReal_ne_zero.2 <| abs.ne_zero hx), re_add_im]
#align complex.exp_log Complex.exp_log
@[simp]
theorem range_exp : Set.range exp = {0}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨by
rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact exp_ne_zero x, fun hx => ⟨log x, exp_log hx⟩⟩
#align complex.range_exp Complex.range_exp
theorem log_exp {x : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) : log (exp x) = x := by
rw [log, abs_exp, Real.log_exp, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, ← ofReal_exp,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (Real.exp_pos _) ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩, re_add_im]
#align complex.log_exp Complex.log_exp
theorem exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi {x y : ℂ} (hx₁ : -π < x.im) (hx₂ : x.im ≤ π) (hy₁ : -π < y.im)
(hy₂ : y.im ≤ π) (hxy : exp x = exp y) : x = y := by
rw [← log_exp hx₁ hx₂, ← log_exp hy₁ hy₂, hxy]
#align complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi Complex.exp_inj_of_neg_pi_lt_of_le_pi
theorem ofReal_log {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : (x.log : ℂ) = log x :=
Complex.ext (by rw [log_re, ofReal_re, abs_of_nonneg hx])
(by rw [ofReal_im, log_im, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx])
#align complex.of_real_log Complex.ofReal_log
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_log {n : ℕ} : Real.log n = log n := ofReal_natCast n ▸ ofReal_log n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_log {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] :
Real.log (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = log (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
natCast_log
theorem log_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (log (x : ℂ)).re = Real.log x := by simp [log_re]
#align complex.log_of_real_re Complex.log_ofReal_re
theorem log_ofReal_mul {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (r * x) = Real.log r + log x := by
replace hx := Complex.abs.ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
simp_rw [log, map_mul, abs_ofReal, arg_real_mul _ hr, abs_of_pos hr, Real.log_mul hr.ne' hx,
ofReal_add, add_assoc]
#align complex.log_of_real_mul Complex.log_ofReal_mul
theorem log_mul_ofReal (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
log (x * r) = Real.log r + log x := by rw [mul_comm, log_ofReal_mul hr hx]
#align complex.log_mul_of_real Complex.log_mul_ofReal
lemma log_mul_eq_add_log_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
log (x * y) = log x + log y ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
refine ext_iff.trans <| Iff.trans ?_ <| arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff hx₀ hy₀
simp_rw [add_re, add_im, log_re, log_im, AbsoluteValue.map_mul,
Real.log_mul (abs.ne_zero hx₀) (abs.ne_zero hy₀), true_and]
alias ⟨_, log_mul⟩ := log_mul_eq_add_log_iff
@[simp]
theorem log_zero : log 0 = 0 := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_zero Complex.log_zero
@[simp]
theorem log_one : log 1 = 0 := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_one Complex.log_one
theorem log_neg_one : log (-1) = π * I := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_neg_one Complex.log_neg_one
theorem log_I : log I = π / 2 * I := by simp [log]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.log_I Complex.log_I
theorem log_neg_I : log (-I) = -(π / 2) * I := by simp [log]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.log_neg_I Complex.log_neg_I
theorem log_conj_eq_ite (x : ℂ) : log (conj x) = if x.arg = π then log x else conj (log x) := by
simp_rw [log, abs_conj, arg_conj, map_add, map_mul, conj_ofReal]
split_ifs with hx
· rw [hx]
simp_rw [ofReal_neg, conj_I, mul_neg, neg_mul]
#align complex.log_conj_eq_ite Complex.log_conj_eq_ite
theorem log_conj (x : ℂ) (h : x.arg ≠ π) : log (conj x) = conj (log x) := by
rw [log_conj_eq_ite, if_neg h]
#align complex.log_conj Complex.log_conj
theorem log_inv_eq_ite (x : ℂ) : log x⁻¹ = if x.arg = π then -conj (log x) else -log x := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
rw [inv_def, log_mul_ofReal, Real.log_inv, ofReal_neg, ← sub_eq_neg_add, log_conj_eq_ite]
· simp_rw [log, map_add, map_mul, conj_ofReal, conj_I, normSq_eq_abs, Real.log_pow,
Nat.cast_two, ofReal_mul, neg_add, mul_neg, neg_neg]
norm_num; rw [two_mul] -- Porting note: added to simplify `↑2`
split_ifs
· rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel_left]
· rw [add_sub_right_comm, sub_add_cancel_left]
· rwa [inv_pos, Complex.normSq_pos]
· rwa [map_ne_zero]
#align complex.log_inv_eq_ite Complex.log_inv_eq_ite
theorem log_inv (x : ℂ) (hx : x.arg ≠ π) : log x⁻¹ = -log x := by rw [log_inv_eq_ite, if_neg hx]
#align complex.log_inv Complex.log_inv
theorem two_pi_I_ne_zero : (2 * π * I : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by norm_num [Real.pi_ne_zero, I_ne_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.two_pi_I_ne_zero Complex.two_pi_I_ne_zero
theorem exp_eq_one_iff {x : ℂ} : exp x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = n * (2 * π * I) := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos x.im (-π) with ⟨n, hn, -⟩
use -n
rw [Int.cast_neg, neg_mul, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero]
have : (x + n * (2 * π * I)).im ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by simpa [two_mul, mul_add] using hn
rw [← log_exp this.1 this.2, exp_periodic.int_mul n, h, log_one]
· rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (exp_periodic.int_mul n).eq.trans exp_zero
#align complex.exp_eq_one_iff Complex.exp_eq_one_iff
theorem exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ exp (x - y) = 1 := by
rw [exp_sub, div_eq_one_iff_eq (exp_ne_zero _)]
#align complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one Complex.exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Log.lean | 172 | 173 | theorem exp_eq_exp_iff_exists_int {x y : ℂ} : exp x = exp y ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, x = y + n * (2 * π * I) := by |
simp only [exp_eq_exp_iff_exp_sub_eq_one, exp_eq_one_iff, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Interval
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Pi
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
#align_import topology.order.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3efd324a3a31eaa40c9d5bfc669c4fafee5f9423"
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: define `Preorder.topology` before `OrderTopology` and reuse the def
class OrderTopology (α : Type*) [t : TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
topology_eq_generate_intervals : t = generateFrom { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a }
#align order_topology OrderTopology
def Preorder.topology (α : Type*) [Preorder α] : TopologicalSpace α :=
generateFrom { s : Set α | ∃ a : α, s = { b : α | a < b } ∨ s = { b : α | b < a } }
#align preorder.topology Preorder.topology
section OrderTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [t : OrderTopology α]
instance : OrderTopology αᵒᵈ :=
⟨by
convert OrderTopology.topology_eq_generate_intervals (α := α) using 6
apply or_comm⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_generate_intervals {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ GenerateOpen { s | ∃ a, s = Ioi a ∨ s = Iio a } s := by
rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals]; rfl
#align is_open_iff_generate_intervals isOpen_iff_generate_intervals
theorem isOpen_lt' (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | a < b } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inl rfl⟩
#align is_open_lt' isOpen_lt'
theorem isOpen_gt' (a : α) : IsOpen { b : α | b < a } :=
isOpen_iff_generate_intervals.2 <| .basic _ ⟨a, .inr rfl⟩
#align is_open_gt' isOpen_gt'
theorem lt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a < x :=
(isOpen_lt' _).mem_nhds h
#align lt_mem_nhds lt_mem_nhds
theorem le_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 b, a ≤ x :=
(lt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
#align le_mem_nhds le_mem_nhds
theorem gt_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b :=
(isOpen_gt' _).mem_nhds h
#align gt_mem_nhds gt_mem_nhds
theorem ge_mem_nhds {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b :=
(gt_mem_nhds h).mono fun _ => le_of_lt
#align ge_mem_nhds ge_mem_nhds
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/Basic.lean | 120 | 123 | theorem nhds_eq_order (a : α) : 𝓝 a = (⨅ b ∈ Iio a, 𝓟 (Ioi b)) ⊓ ⨅ b ∈ Ioi a, 𝓟 (Iio b) := by |
rw [t.topology_eq_generate_intervals, nhds_generateFrom]
simp_rw [mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (a ∈ _), exists_or, or_and_right, iInf_or, iInf_and, iInf_exists,
iInf_inf_eq, iInf_comm (ι := Set α), iInf_iInf_eq_left, mem_Ioi, mem_Iio]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
#align_import data.list.sigma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f808feb6c18afddb25e66a71d317643cf7fb5fbb"
universe u v
namespace List
variable {α : Type u} {β : α → Type v} {l l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)}
def keys : List (Sigma β) → List α :=
map Sigma.fst
#align list.keys List.keys
@[simp]
theorem keys_nil : @keys α β [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.keys_nil List.keys_nil
@[simp]
theorem keys_cons {s} {l : List (Sigma β)} : (s :: l).keys = s.1 :: l.keys :=
rfl
#align list.keys_cons List.keys_cons
theorem mem_keys_of_mem {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} : s ∈ l → s.1 ∈ l.keys :=
mem_map_of_mem Sigma.fst
#align list.mem_keys_of_mem List.mem_keys_of_mem
theorem exists_of_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ∈ l.keys) :
∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
let ⟨⟨_, b'⟩, m, e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map h
Eq.recOn e (Exists.intro b' m)
#align list.exists_of_mem_keys List.exists_of_mem_keys
theorem mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∈ l.keys ↔ ∃ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨exists_of_mem_keys, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_keys_of_mem h⟩
#align list.mem_keys List.mem_keys
theorem not_mem_keys {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l :=
(not_congr mem_keys).trans not_exists
#align list.not_mem_keys List.not_mem_keys
theorem not_eq_key {a} {l : List (Sigma β)} : a ∉ l.keys ↔ ∀ s : Sigma β, s ∈ l → a ≠ s.1 :=
Iff.intro (fun h₁ s h₂ e => absurd (mem_keys_of_mem h₂) (by rwa [e] at h₁)) fun f h₁ =>
let ⟨b, h₂⟩ := exists_of_mem_keys h₁
f _ h₂ rfl
#align list.not_eq_key List.not_eq_key
def NodupKeys (l : List (Sigma β)) : Prop :=
l.keys.Nodup
#align list.nodupkeys List.NodupKeys
theorem nodupKeys_iff_pairwise {l} : NodupKeys l ↔ Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
pairwise_map
#align list.nodupkeys_iff_pairwise List.nodupKeys_iff_pairwise
theorem NodupKeys.pairwise_ne {l} (h : NodupKeys l) :
Pairwise (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 ≠ s'.1) l :=
nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 h
#align list.nodupkeys.pairwise_ne List.NodupKeys.pairwise_ne
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_nil : @NodupKeys α β [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.nodupkeys_nil List.nodupKeys_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} :
NodupKeys (s :: l) ↔ s.1 ∉ l.keys ∧ NodupKeys l := by simp [keys, NodupKeys]
#align list.nodupkeys_cons List.nodupKeys_cons
theorem not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
s.1 ∉ l.keys :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).1
#align list.not_mem_keys_of_nodupkeys_cons List.not_mem_keys_of_nodupKeys_cons
theorem nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : NodupKeys (s :: l)) :
NodupKeys l :=
(nodupKeys_cons.1 h).2
#align list.nodupkeys_of_nodupkeys_cons List.nodupKeys_of_nodupKeys_cons
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l) {s s' : Sigma β} (h : s ∈ l)
(h' : s' ∈ l) : s.1 = s'.1 → s = s' :=
@Pairwise.forall_of_forall _ (fun s s' : Sigma β => s.1 = s'.1 → s = s') _
(fun _ _ H h => (H h.symm).symm) (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
((nodupKeys_iff_pairwise.1 nd).imp fun h h' => (h h').elim) _ h _ h'
#align list.nodupkeys.eq_of_fst_eq List.NodupKeys.eq_of_fst_eq
theorem NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem {a : α} {b b' : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) (h' : Sigma.mk a b' ∈ l) : b = b' := by
cases nd.eq_of_fst_eq h h' rfl; rfl
#align list.nodupkeys.eq_of_mk_mem List.NodupKeys.eq_of_mk_mem
theorem nodupKeys_singleton (s : Sigma β) : NodupKeys [s] :=
nodup_singleton _
#align list.nodupkeys_singleton List.nodupKeys_singleton
theorem NodupKeys.sublist {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : NodupKeys l₂ → NodupKeys l₁ :=
Nodup.sublist <| h.map _
#align list.nodupkeys.sublist List.NodupKeys.sublist
protected theorem NodupKeys.nodup {l : List (Sigma β)} : NodupKeys l → Nodup l :=
Nodup.of_map _
#align list.nodupkeys.nodup List.NodupKeys.nodup
theorem perm_nodupKeys {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (h : l₁ ~ l₂) : NodupKeys l₁ ↔ NodupKeys l₂ :=
(h.map _).nodup_iff
#align list.perm_nodupkeys List.perm_nodupKeys
theorem nodupKeys_join {L : List (List (Sigma β))} :
NodupKeys (join L) ↔ (∀ l ∈ L, NodupKeys l) ∧ Pairwise Disjoint (L.map keys) := by
rw [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise, pairwise_join, pairwise_map]
refine and_congr (forall₂_congr fun l _ => by simp [nodupKeys_iff_pairwise]) ?_
apply iff_of_eq; congr with (l₁ l₂)
simp [keys, disjoint_iff_ne]
#align list.nodupkeys_join List.nodupKeys_join
theorem nodup_enum_map_fst (l : List α) : (l.enum.map Prod.fst).Nodup := by simp [List.nodup_range]
#align list.nodup_enum_map_fst List.nodup_enum_map_fst
theorem mem_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.Nodup) (nd₁ : l₁.Nodup)
(h : ∀ x, x ∈ l₀ ↔ x ∈ l₁) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
(perm_ext_iff_of_nodup nd₀ nd₁).2 h
#align list.mem_ext List.mem_ext
variable [DecidableEq α]
-- Porting note: renaming to `dlookup` since `lookup` already exists
def dlookup (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → Option (β a)
| [] => none
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then some (Eq.recOn h b) else dlookup a l
#align list.lookup List.dlookup
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_nil (a : α) : dlookup a [] = @none (β a) :=
rfl
#align list.lookup_nil List.dlookup_nil
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : dlookup a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = some b :=
dif_pos rfl
#align list.lookup_cons_eq List.dlookup_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem dlookup_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → dlookup a (s :: l) = dlookup a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
#align list.lookup_cons_ne List.dlookup_cons_ne
theorem dlookup_isSome {a : α} : ∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, (dlookup a l).isSome ↔ a ∈ l.keys
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simp [h, dlookup_isSome]
#align list.lookup_is_some List.dlookup_isSome
theorem dlookup_eq_none {a : α} {l : List (Sigma β)} : dlookup a l = none ↔ a ∉ l.keys := by
simp [← dlookup_isSome, Option.isNone_iff_eq_none]
#align list.lookup_eq_none List.dlookup_eq_none
theorem of_mem_dlookup {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ dlookup a l → Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l, H => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp? at H says simp only [dlookup_cons_eq, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq] at H
simp [H]
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, dlookup_cons_ne] at H
simp [of_mem_dlookup H]
#align list.of_mem_lookup List.of_mem_dlookup
theorem mem_dlookup {a} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) (h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) :
b ∈ dlookup a l := by
cases' Option.isSome_iff_exists.mp (dlookup_isSome.mpr (mem_keys_of_mem h)) with b' h'
cases nd.eq_of_mk_mem h (of_mem_dlookup h')
exact h'
#align list.mem_lookup List.mem_dlookup
theorem map_dlookup_eq_find (a : α) :
∀ l : List (Sigma β), (dlookup a l).map (Sigma.mk a) = find? (fun s => a = s.1) l
| [] => rfl
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp
· simpa [h] using map_dlookup_eq_find a l
#align list.map_lookup_eq_find List.map_dlookup_eq_find
theorem mem_dlookup_iff {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l.NodupKeys) :
b ∈ dlookup a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l :=
⟨of_mem_dlookup, mem_dlookup nd⟩
#align list.mem_lookup_iff List.mem_dlookup_iff
theorem perm_dlookup (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : dlookup a l₁ = dlookup a l₂ := by
ext b; simp only [mem_dlookup_iff nd₁, mem_dlookup_iff nd₂]; exact p.mem_iff
#align list.perm_lookup List.perm_dlookup
theorem lookup_ext {l₀ l₁ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₀ : l₀.NodupKeys) (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys)
(h : ∀ x y, y ∈ l₀.dlookup x ↔ y ∈ l₁.dlookup x) : l₀ ~ l₁ :=
mem_ext nd₀.nodup nd₁.nodup fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by
rw [← mem_dlookup_iff, ← mem_dlookup_iff, h] <;> assumption
#align list.lookup_ext List.lookup_ext
def lookupAll (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (β a)
| [] => []
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => if h : a' = a then Eq.recOn h b :: lookupAll a l else lookupAll a l
#align list.lookup_all List.lookupAll
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_nil (a : α) : lookupAll a [] = @nil (β a) :=
rfl
#align list.lookup_all_nil List.lookupAll_nil
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_eq (l) (a : α) (b : β a) : lookupAll a (⟨a, b⟩ :: l) = b :: lookupAll a l :=
dif_pos rfl
#align list.lookup_all_cons_eq List.lookupAll_cons_eq
@[simp]
theorem lookupAll_cons_ne (l) {a} : ∀ s : Sigma β, a ≠ s.1 → lookupAll a (s :: l) = lookupAll a l
| ⟨_, _⟩, h => dif_neg h.symm
#align list.lookup_all_cons_ne List.lookupAll_cons_ne
theorem lookupAll_eq_nil {a : α} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, lookupAll a l = [] ↔ ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst a'
simp only [lookupAll_cons_eq, mem_cons, Sigma.mk.inj_iff, heq_eq_eq, true_and, not_or,
false_iff, not_forall, not_and, not_not]
use b
simp
· simp [h, lookupAll_eq_nil]
#align list.lookup_all_eq_nil List.lookupAll_eq_nil
theorem head?_lookupAll (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), head? (lookupAll a l) = dlookup a l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h; simp
· rw [lookupAll_cons_ne, dlookup_cons_ne, head?_lookupAll a l] <;> assumption
#align list.head_lookup_all List.head?_lookupAll
theorem mem_lookupAll {a : α} {b : β a} :
∀ {l : List (Sigma β)}, b ∈ lookupAll a l ↔ Sigma.mk a b ∈ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
· simp [*, mem_lookupAll]
#align list.mem_lookup_all List.mem_lookupAll
theorem lookupAll_sublist (a : α) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (lookupAll a l).map (Sigma.mk a) <+ l
| [] => by simp
| ⟨a', b'⟩ :: l => by
by_cases h : a = a'
· subst h
simp only [ne_eq, not_true, lookupAll_cons_eq, List.map]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons₂ _
· simp only [ne_eq, h, not_false_iff, lookupAll_cons_ne]
exact (lookupAll_sublist a l).cons _
#align list.lookup_all_sublist List.lookupAll_sublist
theorem lookupAll_length_le_one (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
length (lookupAll a l) ≤ 1 := by
have := Nodup.sublist ((lookupAll_sublist a l).map _) h
rw [map_map] at this
rwa [← nodup_replicate, ← map_const]
#align list.lookup_all_length_le_one List.lookupAll_length_le_one
theorem lookupAll_eq_dlookup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) :
lookupAll a l = (dlookup a l).toList := by
rw [← head?_lookupAll]
have h1 := lookupAll_length_le_one a h; revert h1
rcases lookupAll a l with (_ | ⟨b, _ | ⟨c, l⟩⟩) <;> intro h1 <;> try rfl
exact absurd h1 (by simp)
#align list.lookup_all_eq_lookup List.lookupAll_eq_dlookup
theorem lookupAll_nodup (a : α) {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : l.NodupKeys) : (lookupAll a l).Nodup := by
(rw [lookupAll_eq_dlookup a h]; apply Option.toList_nodup)
#align list.lookup_all_nodup List.lookupAll_nodup
theorem perm_lookupAll (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd₁ : l₁.NodupKeys) (nd₂ : l₂.NodupKeys)
(p : l₁ ~ l₂) : lookupAll a l₁ = lookupAll a l₂ := by
simp [lookupAll_eq_dlookup, nd₁, nd₂, perm_dlookup a nd₁ nd₂ p]
#align list.perm_lookup_all List.perm_lookupAll
def kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
lookmap fun s => if a = s.1 then some ⟨a, b⟩ else none
#align list.kreplace List.kreplace
theorem kreplace_of_forall_not (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)}
(H : ∀ b : β a, Sigma.mk a b ∉ l) : kreplace a b l = l :=
lookmap_of_forall_not _ <| by
rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h; dsimp; split_ifs
· subst a'
exact H _ h
· rfl
#align list.kreplace_of_forall_not List.kreplace_of_forall_not
theorem kreplace_self {a : α} {b : β a} {l : List (Sigma β)} (nd : NodupKeys l)
(h : Sigma.mk a b ∈ l) : kreplace a b l = l := by
refine (lookmap_congr ?_).trans (lookmap_id' (Option.guard fun (s : Sigma β) => a = s.1) ?_ _)
· rintro ⟨a', b'⟩ h'
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· subst a'
simp [nd.eq_of_mk_mem h h']
· rfl
· rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp [Option.guard]
split_ifs
· simp
· rintro ⟨⟩
#align list.kreplace_self List.kreplace_self
theorem keys_kreplace (a : α) (b : β a) : ∀ l : List (Sigma β), (kreplace a b l).keys = l.keys :=
lookmap_map_eq _ _ <| by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₂⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [h]
#align list.keys_kreplace List.keys_kreplace
theorem kreplace_nodupKeys (a : α) (b : β a) {l : List (Sigma β)} :
(kreplace a b l).NodupKeys ↔ l.NodupKeys := by simp [NodupKeys, keys_kreplace]
#align list.kreplace_nodupkeys List.kreplace_nodupKeys
theorem Perm.kreplace {a : α} {b : β a} {l₁ l₂ : List (Sigma β)} (nd : l₁.NodupKeys) :
l₁ ~ l₂ → kreplace a b l₁ ~ kreplace a b l₂ :=
perm_lookmap _ <| by
refine nd.pairwise_ne.imp ?_
intro x y h z h₁ w h₂
split_ifs at h₁ h₂ with h_2 h_1 <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂
exact (h (h_2.symm.trans h_1)).elim
#align list.perm.kreplace List.Perm.kreplace
def kerase (a : α) : List (Sigma β) → List (Sigma β) :=
eraseP fun s => a = s.1
#align list.kerase List.kerase
-- Porting note (#10618): removing @[simp], `simp` can prove it
theorem kerase_nil {a} : @kerase _ β _ a [] = [] :=
rfl
#align list.kerase_nil List.kerase_nil
@[simp]
theorem kerase_cons_eq {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a = s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = l := by simp [kerase, h]
#align list.kerase_cons_eq List.kerase_cons_eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sigma.lean | 407 | 408 | theorem kerase_cons_ne {a} {s : Sigma β} {l : List (Sigma β)} (h : a ≠ s.1) :
kerase a (s :: l) = s :: kerase a l := by | simp [kerase, h]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.fixed_point from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0dd4319a17376eda5763cd0a7e0d35bbaaa50e83"
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Function Order
namespace Ordinal
section
variable {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
def nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (List.foldr f a)
#align ordinal.nfp_family Ordinal.nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_sup (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a = sup.{u, v} (List.foldr f a) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_sup Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_sup
theorem foldr_le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal)
(a l) : List.foldr f a l ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_family Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpFamily
theorem le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) : a ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
le_sup _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_family Ordinal.le_nfpFamily
theorem lt_nfpFamily {a b} : a < nfpFamily.{u, v} f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr f b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_family Ordinal.lt_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_le_iff {a b} : nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_iff Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le {a b} : (∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b) → nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le Ordinal.nfpFamily_le
theorem nfpFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) : Monotone (nfpFamily.{u, v} f) :=
fun _ _ h => sup_le.{u, v} fun l => (List.foldr_monotone hf l h).trans (le_sup.{u, v} _ l)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_monotone Ordinal.nfpFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) (i) :
f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily.1 hb
lt_sup.2 ⟨i::l, (H i).strictMono hl⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
⟨fun h =>
lt_nfpFamily.2 <|
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_sup.1 <| h <| Classical.arbitrary ι
⟨l, ((H _).self_le b).trans_lt hl⟩,
apply_lt_nfpFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le_apply [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∃ i, nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ f i b) ↔ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff H
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_apply Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ i, f i b ≤ b) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le fun l => by
by_cases hι : IsEmpty ι
· rwa [Unique.eq_default l]
· induction' l with i l IH generalizing a
· exact ab
exact (H i (IH ab)).trans (h i)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (a) :
f i (nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
unfold nfpFamily
rw [@IsNormal.sup.{u, v, v} _ H _ _ ⟨[]⟩]
apply le_antisymm <;> refine Ordinal.sup_le fun l => ?_
· exact le_sup _ (i::l)
· exact (H.self_le _).trans (le_sup _ _)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpFamily [hι : Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i))
{a b} : (∀ i, f i b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i => ?_⟩
· cases' hι with i
exact ((H i).self_le b).trans (h i)
rw [← nfpFamily_fp (H i)]
exact (H i).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_le_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_self {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a} (h : ∀ i, f i a = a) :
nfpFamily f a = a :=
le_antisymm (sup_le fun l => by rw [List.foldr_fixed' h l]) <| le_nfpFamily f a
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_self Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_self
-- Todo: This is actually a special case of the fact the intersection of club sets is a club set.
theorem fp_family_unbounded (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
(⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpFamily.{u, v} f a, fun s ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, mem_fixedPoints_iff]
exact nfpFamily_fp.{u, v} (H i) a, (le_nfpFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_family_unbounded Ordinal.fp_family_unbounded
def derivFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
limitRecOn o (nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0) (fun _ IH => nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ IH))
fun a _ => bsup.{max u v, u} a
#align ordinal.deriv_family Ordinal.derivFamily
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_zero (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f 0 = nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0 :=
limitRecOn_zero _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_zero Ordinal.derivFamily_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_succ (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f (succ o) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ (derivFamily.{u, v} f o)) :=
limitRecOn_succ _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_succ Ordinal.derivFamily_succ
theorem derivFamily_limit (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) {o} :
IsLimit o → derivFamily.{u, v} f o = bsup.{max u v, u} o fun a _ => derivFamily.{u, v} f a :=
limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_limit Ordinal.derivFamily_limit
theorem derivFamily_isNormal (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) : IsNormal (derivFamily f) :=
⟨fun o => by rw [derivFamily_succ, ← succ_le_iff]; apply le_nfpFamily, fun o l a => by
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, bsup_le_iff]⟩
#align ordinal.deriv_family_is_normal Ordinal.derivFamily_isNormal
theorem derivFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (o : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
f i (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) = derivFamily.{u, v} f o := by
induction' o using limitRecOn with o _ o l IH
· rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_fp H 0
· rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_fp H _
· rw [derivFamily_limit _ l,
IsNormal.bsup.{max u v, u, max u v} H (fun a _ => derivFamily f a) l.1]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [bsup_le_iff, IH]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_fp Ordinal.derivFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
⟨fun ha => by
suffices ∀ (o) (_ : a ≤ derivFamily.{u, v} f o), ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a from
this a ((derivFamily_isNormal _).self_le _)
intro o
induction' o using limitRecOn with o IH o l IH
· intro h₁
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (Ordinal.zero_le _) ha
· intro h₁
rcases le_or_lt a (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) with h | h
· exact IH h
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (succ_le_of_lt h) ha
· intro h₁
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with h h
· exact ⟨_, h.symm⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le_iff, not_forall₂] at h
exact
let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h
IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl),
fun ⟨o, e⟩ i => e ▸ (derivFamily_fp (H i) _).le⟩
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.le_iff_derivFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a = a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h i => le_of_eq (h i), fun h i => (H i).le_iff_eq.1 (h i)⟩ (le_iff_derivFamily H)
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.fp_iff_derivFamily
theorem derivFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f = enumOrd (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_family_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun a ha => ?_⟩
· rintro a S ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [← hi]
exact derivFamily_fp (H i) a
rw [Set.mem_iInter] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivFamily H]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.derivFamily_eq_enumOrd
end
section
variable {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
def nfpBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily Ordinal.nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f = nfpFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_nfp_family Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily
theorem foldr_le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal}
(f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a l) :
List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpBFamily
theorem le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) :
a ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.le_nfpBFamily
theorem lt_nfpBFamily {a b} :
a < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.lt_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_iff Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
(∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b) → nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le
theorem nfpBFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) : Monotone (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_monotone Ordinal.nfpBFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a)
(i hi) : f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply apply_lt_nfpFamily (fun _ => H _ _) hb
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
⟨fun h => by
haveI := out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
refine (apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff.{u, v} ?_).1 fun _ => h _ _
exact fun _ => H _ _, apply_lt_nfpBFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le_apply (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∃ i hi, nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ f i hi b) ↔ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff.{u, v} ho H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_apply Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpBFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b)
(h : ∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ b) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H _ _) ab fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a) :
f i hi (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply nfpFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpBFamily (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· have ho' : 0 < o := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
exact ((H 0 ho').self_le b).trans (h 0 ho')
· rw [← nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi)]
exact (H i hi).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_le_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_self {a} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_self Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_self
theorem fp_bfamily_unbounded (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
(⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpBFamily.{u, v} _ f a, by
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂]
exact fun i hi => nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi) _, (le_nfpBFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded Ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded
def derivBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily Ordinal.derivBFamily
theorem derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = derivFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_eq_deriv_family Ordinal.derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily
theorem derivBFamily_isNormal {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal (derivBFamily o f) :=
derivFamily_isNormal _
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_is_normal Ordinal.derivBFamily_isNormal
theorem derivBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a : Ordinal) :
f i hi (derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply derivFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_fp Ordinal.derivBFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
unfold derivBFamily
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily]
· refine ⟨fun h i => h _ _, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply h
· exact fun _ => H _ _
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.le_iff_derivBFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
rw [← le_iff_derivBFamily H]
refine ⟨fun h i hi => le_of_eq (h i hi), fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← (H i hi).le_iff_eq]
exact h i hi
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.fp_iff_derivBFamily
theorem derivBFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = enumOrd (⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)) := by
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_bfamily_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivBFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨fun a => Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun i hi => derivBFamily_fp (H i hi) a, fun a ha => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivBFamily H]
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.derivBFamily_eq_enumOrd
end
section
variable {f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}}
def nfp (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f
#align ordinal.nfp Ordinal.nfp
theorem nfp_eq_nfpFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : nfp f = nfpFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_eq_nfp_family Ordinal.nfp_eq_nfpFamily
@[simp]
theorem sup_iterate_eq_nfp (f : Ordinal.{u} → Ordinal.{u}) :
(fun a => sup fun n : ℕ => f^[n] a) = nfp f := by
refine funext fun a => le_antisymm ?_ (sup_le fun l => ?_)
· rw [sup_le_iff]
intro n
rw [← List.length_replicate n Unit.unit, ← List.foldr_const f a]
apply le_sup
· rw [List.foldr_const f a l]
exact le_sup _ _
#align ordinal.sup_iterate_eq_nfp Ordinal.sup_iterate_eq_nfp
theorem iterate_le_nfp (f a n) : f^[n] a ≤ nfp f a := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact le_sup _ n
#align ordinal.iterate_le_nfp Ordinal.iterate_le_nfp
theorem le_nfp (f a) : a ≤ nfp f a :=
iterate_le_nfp f a 0
#align ordinal.le_nfp Ordinal.le_nfp
theorem lt_nfp {a b} : a < nfp f b ↔ ∃ n, a < f^[n] b := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact lt_sup
#align ordinal.lt_nfp Ordinal.lt_nfp
theorem nfp_le_iff {a b} : nfp f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b := by
rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp]
exact sup_le_iff
#align ordinal.nfp_le_iff Ordinal.nfp_le_iff
theorem nfp_le {a b} : (∀ n, f^[n] a ≤ b) → nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfp_le_iff.2
#align ordinal.nfp_le Ordinal.nfp_le
@[simp]
theorem nfp_id : nfp id = id :=
funext fun a => by
simp_rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp, iterate_id]
exact sup_const a
#align ordinal.nfp_id Ordinal.nfp_id
theorem nfp_monotone (hf : Monotone f) : Monotone (nfp f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf
#align ordinal.nfp_monotone Ordinal.nfp_monotone
theorem IsNormal.apply_lt_nfp {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b < nfp f a ↔ b < nfp f a := by
unfold nfp
rw [← @apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff Unit (fun _ => f) _ (fun _ => H) a b]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.apply_lt_nfp Ordinal.IsNormal.apply_lt_nfp
theorem IsNormal.nfp_le_apply {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : nfp f a ≤ f b ↔ nfp f a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.apply_lt_nfp
#align ordinal.is_normal.nfp_le_apply Ordinal.IsNormal.nfp_le_apply
theorem nfp_le_fp {f} (H : Monotone f) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : f b ≤ b) : nfp f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H) ab fun _ => h
#align ordinal.nfp_le_fp Ordinal.nfp_le_fp
theorem IsNormal.nfp_fp {f} (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ a, f (nfp f a) = nfp f a :=
@nfpFamily_fp Unit (fun _ => f) Unit.unit H
#align ordinal.is_normal.nfp_fp Ordinal.IsNormal.nfp_fp
theorem IsNormal.apply_le_nfp {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f b ≤ nfp f a ↔ b ≤ nfp f a :=
⟨le_trans (H.self_le _), fun h => by simpa only [H.nfp_fp] using H.le_iff.2 h⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.apply_le_nfp Ordinal.IsNormal.apply_le_nfp
theorem nfp_eq_self {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} {a} (h : f a = a) : nfp f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h
#align ordinal.nfp_eq_self Ordinal.nfp_eq_self
theorem fp_unbounded (H : IsNormal f) : (Function.fixedPoints f).Unbounded (· < ·) := by
convert fp_family_unbounded fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
#align ordinal.fp_unbounded Ordinal.fp_unbounded
def deriv (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f
#align ordinal.deriv Ordinal.deriv
theorem deriv_eq_derivFamily (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : deriv f = derivFamily fun _ : Unit => f :=
rfl
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_deriv_family Ordinal.deriv_eq_derivFamily
@[simp]
theorem deriv_zero (f) : deriv f 0 = nfp f 0 :=
derivFamily_zero _
#align ordinal.deriv_zero Ordinal.deriv_zero
@[simp]
theorem deriv_succ (f o) : deriv f (succ o) = nfp f (succ (deriv f o)) :=
derivFamily_succ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_succ Ordinal.deriv_succ
theorem deriv_limit (f) {o} : IsLimit o → deriv f o = bsup.{u, 0} o fun a _ => deriv f a :=
derivFamily_limit _
#align ordinal.deriv_limit Ordinal.deriv_limit
theorem deriv_isNormal (f) : IsNormal (deriv f) :=
derivFamily_isNormal _
#align ordinal.deriv_is_normal Ordinal.deriv_isNormal
theorem deriv_id_of_nfp_id {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
((deriv_isNormal _).eq_iff_zero_and_succ IsNormal.refl).2 (by simp [h])
#align ordinal.deriv_id_of_nfp_id Ordinal.deriv_id_of_nfp_id
theorem IsNormal.deriv_fp {f} (H : IsNormal f) : ∀ o, f (deriv f o) = deriv f o :=
@derivFamily_fp Unit (fun _ => f) Unit.unit H
#align ordinal.is_normal.deriv_fp Ordinal.IsNormal.deriv_fp
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_deriv {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
unfold deriv
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily fun _ : Unit => H]
exact ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h => h Unit.unit⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_deriv Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_deriv
theorem IsNormal.fp_iff_deriv {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a = a ↔ ∃ o, deriv f o = a := by
rw [← H.le_iff_eq, H.le_iff_deriv]
#align ordinal.is_normal.fp_iff_deriv Ordinal.IsNormal.fp_iff_deriv
theorem deriv_eq_enumOrd (H : IsNormal f) : deriv f = enumOrd (Function.fixedPoints f) := by
convert derivFamily_eq_enumOrd fun _ : Unit => H
exact (Set.iInter_const _).symm
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.deriv_eq_enumOrd
theorem deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id {f : Ordinal → Ordinal} (h : nfp f = id) : deriv f = id :=
(IsNormal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ (deriv_isNormal _) IsNormal.refl).2 <| by simp [h]
#align ordinal.deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id Ordinal.deriv_eq_id_of_nfp_eq_id
end
@[simp]
theorem nfp_add_zero (a) : nfp (a + ·) 0 = a * omega := by
simp_rw [← sup_iterate_eq_nfp, ← sup_mul_nat]
congr; funext n
induction' n with n hn
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, iterate_zero_apply]
· rw [iterate_succ_apply', Nat.add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one_add, hn]
#align ordinal.nfp_add_zero Ordinal.nfp_add_zero
theorem nfp_add_eq_mul_omega {a b} (hba : b ≤ a * omega) : nfp (a + ·) b = a * omega := by
apply le_antisymm (nfp_le_fp (add_isNormal a).monotone hba _)
· rw [← nfp_add_zero]
exact nfp_monotone (add_isNormal a).monotone (Ordinal.zero_le b)
· dsimp; rw [← mul_one_add, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.nfp_add_eq_mul_omega Ordinal.nfp_add_eq_mul_omega
theorem add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = b ↔ a * omega ≤ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rw [← nfp_add_zero a, ← deriv_zero]
cases' (add_isNormal a).fp_iff_deriv.1 h with c hc
rw [← hc]
exact (deriv_isNormal _).monotone (Ordinal.zero_le _)
· have := Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h
nth_rw 1 [← this]
rwa [← add_assoc, ← mul_one_add, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le Ordinal.add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le
theorem add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le {a b : Ordinal} : a + b ≤ b ↔ a * omega ≤ b := by
rw [← add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le]
exact (add_isNormal a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le Ordinal.add_le_right_iff_mul_omega_le
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPoint.lean | 596 | 603 | theorem deriv_add_eq_mul_omega_add (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : deriv (a + ·) b = a * omega + b := by |
revert b
rw [← funext_iff, IsNormal.eq_iff_zero_and_succ (deriv_isNormal _) (add_isNormal _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun a h => ?_⟩
· rw [deriv_zero, add_zero]
exact nfp_add_zero a
· rw [deriv_succ, h, add_succ]
exact nfp_eq_self (add_eq_right_iff_mul_omega_le.2 ((le_add_right _ _).trans (le_succ _)))
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Fin
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import algebra.big_operators.fin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cc5dd6244981976cc9da7afc4eee5682b037a013"
open Finset
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
namespace Fin
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ofFn [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → β) : (List.ofFn f).prod = ∏ i, f i := by
simp [prod_eq_multiset_prod]
#align fin.prod_of_fn Fin.prod_ofFn
#align fin.sum_of_fn Fin.sum_ofFn
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_def [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n → β) :
∏ i, f i = ((List.finRange n).map f).prod := by
rw [← List.ofFn_eq_map, prod_ofFn]
#align fin.prod_univ_def Fin.prod_univ_def
#align fin.sum_univ_def Fin.sum_univ_def
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin 0 → β` is `0` because `Fin 0` is empty"]
theorem prod_univ_zero [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 0 → β) : ∏ i, f i = 1 :=
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_zero Fin.prod_univ_zero
#align fin.sum_univ_zero Fin.sum_univ_zero
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → β` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f x`, for some `x : Fin (n + 1)` plus the remaining product"]
theorem prod_univ_succAbove [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → β) (x : Fin (n + 1)) :
∏ i, f i = f x * ∏ i : Fin n, f (x.succAbove i) := by
rw [univ_succAbove, prod_cons, Finset.prod_map _ x.succAboveEmb]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_succ_above Fin.prod_univ_succAbove
#align fin.sum_univ_succ_above Fin.sum_univ_succAbove
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → β` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f 0` plus the remaining product"]
theorem prod_univ_succ [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → β) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * ∏ i : Fin n, f i.succ :=
prod_univ_succAbove f 0
#align fin.prod_univ_succ Fin.prod_univ_succ
#align fin.sum_univ_succ Fin.sum_univ_succ
@[to_additive "A sum of a function `f : Fin (n + 1) → β` over all `Fin (n + 1)` is the sum of
`f (Fin.last n)` plus the remaining sum"]
theorem prod_univ_castSucc [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (f : Fin (n + 1) → β) :
∏ i, f i = (∏ i : Fin n, f (Fin.castSucc i)) * f (last n) := by
simpa [mul_comm] using prod_univ_succAbove f (last n)
#align fin.prod_univ_cast_succ Fin.prod_univ_castSucc
#align fin.sum_univ_cast_succ Fin.sum_univ_castSucc
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_get [CommMonoid α] (l : List α) : ∏ i, l.get i = l.prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_get' [CommMonoid β] (l : List α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i, f (l.get i) = (l.map f).prod := by
simp [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_cons [CommMonoid β] {n : ℕ} (x : β) (f : Fin n → β) :
(∏ i : Fin n.succ, (cons x f : Fin n.succ → β) i) = x * ∏ i : Fin n, f i := by
simp_rw [prod_univ_succ, cons_zero, cons_succ]
#align fin.prod_cons Fin.prod_cons
#align fin.sum_cons Fin.sum_cons
@[to_additive sum_univ_one]
theorem prod_univ_one [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 1 → β) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 := by simp
#align fin.prod_univ_one Fin.prod_univ_one
#align fin.sum_univ_one Fin.sum_univ_one
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_univ_two [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 2 → β) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 := by
simp [prod_univ_succ]
#align fin.prod_univ_two Fin.prod_univ_two
#align fin.sum_univ_two Fin.sum_univ_two
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_two' [CommMonoid β] (f : α → β) (a b : α) :
∏ i, f (![a, b] i) = f a * f b :=
prod_univ_two _
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_three [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 3 → β) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_two]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_three Fin.prod_univ_three
#align fin.sum_univ_three Fin.sum_univ_three
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_four [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 4 → β) : ∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_three]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_four Fin.prod_univ_four
#align fin.sum_univ_four Fin.sum_univ_four
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_five [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 5 → β) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_four]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_five Fin.prod_univ_five
#align fin.sum_univ_five Fin.sum_univ_five
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_six [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 6 → β) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_five]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_six Fin.prod_univ_six
#align fin.sum_univ_six Fin.sum_univ_six
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_seven [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 7 → β) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_six]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_seven Fin.prod_univ_seven
#align fin.sum_univ_seven Fin.sum_univ_seven
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_univ_eight [CommMonoid β] (f : Fin 8 → β) :
∏ i, f i = f 0 * f 1 * f 2 * f 3 * f 4 * f 5 * f 6 * f 7 := by
rw [prod_univ_castSucc, prod_univ_seven]
rfl
#align fin.prod_univ_eight Fin.prod_univ_eight
#align fin.sum_univ_eight Fin.sum_univ_eight
theorem sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow {n : ℕ} {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (a b : R) :
(∑ s : Finset (Fin n), a ^ s.card * b ^ (n - s.card)) = (a + b) ^ n := by
simpa using Fintype.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow (Fin n) a b
#align fin.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow Fin.sum_pow_mul_eq_add_pow
theorem prod_const [CommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : ∏ _i : Fin n, x = x ^ n := by simp
#align fin.prod_const Fin.prod_const
theorem sum_const [AddCommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x : α) : ∑ _i : Fin n, x = n • x := by simp
#align fin.sum_const Fin.sum_const
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_zero {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} {v : Fin n.succ → M} :
∏ i ∈ Ioi 0, v i = ∏ j : Fin n, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_zero_eq_map, Finset.prod_map, val_succEmb]
#align fin.prod_Ioi_zero Fin.prod_Ioi_zero
#align fin.sum_Ioi_zero Fin.sum_Ioi_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioi_succ {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) (v : Fin n.succ → M) :
∏ j ∈ Ioi i.succ, v j = ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, v j.succ := by
rw [Ioi_succ, Finset.prod_map, val_succEmb]
#align fin.prod_Ioi_succ Fin.prod_Ioi_succ
#align fin.sum_Ioi_succ Fin.sum_Ioi_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_congr' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin b → M) (h : a = b) :
(∏ i : Fin a, f (cast h i)) = ∏ i : Fin b, f i := by
subst h
congr
#align fin.prod_congr' Fin.prod_congr'
#align fin.sum_congr' Fin.sum_congr'
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Fin.lean | 208 | 213 | theorem prod_univ_add {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] {a b : ℕ} (f : Fin (a + b) → M) :
(∏ i : Fin (a + b), f i) = (∏ i : Fin a, f (castAdd b i)) * ∏ i : Fin b, f (natAdd a i) := by |
rw [Fintype.prod_equiv finSumFinEquiv.symm f fun i => f (finSumFinEquiv.toFun i)]
· apply Fintype.prod_sum_type
· intro x
simp only [Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
|
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
section erase
variable [BEq α]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) : ∀ l : List α, l.erase a = l.eraseP (a == ·)
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
if h : a = b then simp [h] else simp [h, Ne.symm h, erase_eq_eraseP a l]
theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, e, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_eraseP h (beq_self_eq_true _)
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, fun h => h₁ _ h (beq_self_eq_true _), eq_of_beq e ▸ h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 560 | 562 | theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by |
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
theorem oangle_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arccos (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arccos (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arccos_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arcsin (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arcsin (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arcsin_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₂ p₃ p₁ = Real.arctan (dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
∡ p₃ p₁ p₂ = Real.arctan (dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂) := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm,
angle_eq_arctan_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.oangle_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.oangle_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₃ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)),
dist_comm p₁ p₃]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) = dist p₁ p₂ / dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.tan_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.tan_oangle_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) = dist p₃ p₂ / dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.tan_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.tan_oangle_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.cos_coe, dist_comm p₁ p₃,
cos_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.cos_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.cos_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) * dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₃ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.sin_coe, dist_comm p₁ p₃,
sin_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align euclidean_geometry.sin_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.sin_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁) * dist p₃ p₂ = dist p₁ p₂ := by
have hs : (∡ p₂ p₃ p₁).sign = 1 := by rw [oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (right_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align euclidean_geometry.tan_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two EuclideanGeometry.tan_oangle_right_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 737 | 742 | theorem tan_oangle_left_mul_dist_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(h : ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂) * dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₃ p₂ := by |
have hs : (∡ p₃ p₁ p₂).sign = 1 := by rw [← oangle_rotate_sign, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, angle_comm, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
tan_angle_mul_dist_of_angle_eq_pi_div_two (angle_rev_eq_pi_div_two_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (left_ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Complex
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gaussian from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7982767093ae38cba236487f9c9dd9cd99f63c16"
noncomputable section
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics
open scoped Real Topology
open Complex hiding exp abs_of_nonneg
theorem exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg {p b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) (hp : 1 < p) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
suffices Tendsto (fun x => x * (b * x ^ (p - 1) + -1)) atTop atTop by
refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ this
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ)) (fun x hx => ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [rpow_sub_one hx.ne']
field_simp [hx.ne']
ring
apply Tendsto.atTop_mul_atTop tendsto_id
refine tendsto_atTop_add_const_right atTop (-1 : ℝ) ?_
exact Tendsto.const_mul_atTop hb (tendsto_rpow_atTop (by linarith))
theorem exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-b * x ^ 2)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) := by
simp_rw [← rpow_two]
exact exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb one_lt_two
#align exp_neg_mul_sq_is_o_exp_neg exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/GaussianIntegral.lean | 51 | 55 | theorem rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg (s : ℝ) {b p : ℝ} (hp : 1 < p) (hb : 0 < b) :
(fun x : ℝ => x ^ s * exp (- b * x ^ p)) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by |
apply ((isBigO_refl (fun x : ℝ => x ^ s) atTop).mul_isLittleO
(exp_neg_mul_rpow_isLittleO_exp_neg hb hp)).trans
simpa only [mul_comm] using Real.Gamma_integrand_isLittleO s
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.quadratic_form.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11f435d4e34a6cea0a1797d6b625b0c170be845"
universe u v w
variable {S T : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} {M N : Type*}
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
section Polar
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M]
namespace QuadraticForm
def polar (f : M → R) (x y : M) :=
f (x + y) - f x - f y
#align quadratic_form.polar QuadraticForm.polar
theorem polar_add (f g : M → R) (x y : M) : polar (f + g) x y = polar f x y + polar g x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.add_apply]
abel
#align quadratic_form.polar_add QuadraticForm.polar_add
theorem polar_neg (f : M → R) (x y : M) : polar (-f) x y = -polar f x y := by
simp only [polar, Pi.neg_apply, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
#align quadratic_form.polar_neg QuadraticForm.polar_neg
theorem polar_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] (f : M → R) (s : S) (x y : M) :
polar (s • f) x y = s • polar f x y := by simp only [polar, Pi.smul_apply, smul_sub]
#align quadratic_form.polar_smul QuadraticForm.polar_smul
theorem polar_comm (f : M → R) (x y : M) : polar f x y = polar f y x := by
rw [polar, polar, add_comm, sub_sub, sub_sub, add_comm (f x) (f y)]
#align quadratic_form.polar_comm QuadraticForm.polar_comm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/QuadraticForm/Basic.lean | 116 | 123 | theorem polar_add_left_iff {f : M → R} {x x' y : M} :
polar f (x + x') y = polar f x y + polar f x' y ↔
f (x + x' + y) + (f x + f x' + f y) = f (x + x') + f (x' + y) + f (y + x) := by |
simp only [← add_assoc]
simp only [polar, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, sub_add_eq_add_sub, add_sub]
simp only [add_right_comm _ (f y) _, add_right_comm _ (f x') (f x)]
rw [add_comm y x, add_right_comm _ _ (f (x + y)), add_comm _ (f (x + y)),
add_right_comm (f (x + y)), add_left_inj]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AddTorsorBases
#align_import analysis.convex.intrinsic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
open AffineSubspace Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {𝕜 V W Q P : Type*}
section AddTorsor
variable (𝕜) [Ring 𝕜] [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [TopologicalSpace P] [AddTorsor V P]
{s t : Set P} {x : P}
def intrinsicInterior (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
#align intrinsic_interior intrinsicInterior
def intrinsicFrontier (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
#align intrinsic_frontier intrinsicFrontier
def intrinsicClosure (s : Set P) : Set P :=
(↑) '' closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s)
#align intrinsic_closure intrinsicClosure
variable {𝕜}
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicInterior :
x ∈ intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ interior ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
#align mem_intrinsic_interior mem_intrinsicInterior
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicFrontier :
x ∈ intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ frontier ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
#align mem_intrinsic_frontier mem_intrinsicFrontier
@[simp]
theorem mem_intrinsicClosure :
x ∈ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ closure ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set <| affineSpan 𝕜 s) ∧ ↑y = x :=
mem_image _ _ _
#align mem_intrinsic_closure mem_intrinsicClosure
theorem intrinsicInterior_subset : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 interior_subset
#align intrinsic_interior_subset intrinsicInterior_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 (hs.preimage continuous_induced_dom).frontier_subset
#align intrinsic_frontier_subset intrinsicFrontier_subset
theorem intrinsicFrontier_subset_intrinsicClosure : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
image_subset _ frontier_subset_closure
#align intrinsic_frontier_subset_intrinsic_closure intrinsicFrontier_subset_intrinsicClosure
theorem subset_intrinsicClosure : s ⊆ intrinsicClosure 𝕜 s :=
fun x hx => ⟨⟨x, subset_affineSpan _ _ hx⟩, subset_closure hx, rfl⟩
#align subset_intrinsic_closure subset_intrinsicClosure
@[simp]
theorem intrinsicInterior_empty : intrinsicInterior 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by simp [intrinsicInterior]
#align intrinsic_interior_empty intrinsicInterior_empty
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Intrinsic.lean | 116 | 116 | theorem intrinsicFrontier_empty : intrinsicFrontier 𝕜 (∅ : Set P) = ∅ := by | simp [intrinsicFrontier]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Cone.InnerDual
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Nonneg.Module
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Basic
variable {𝕜 E F G : Type*}
local notation3 "𝕜≥0" => {c : 𝕜 // 0 ≤ c}
abbrev PointedCone (𝕜 E) [OrderedSemiring 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] :=
Submodule {c : 𝕜 // 0 ≤ c} E
namespace PointedCone
open Function
section Definitions
variable [OrderedSemiring 𝕜]
variable [AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E]
@[coe]
def toConvexCone (S : PointedCone 𝕜 E) : ConvexCone 𝕜 E where
carrier := S
smul_mem' c hc _ hx := S.smul_mem ⟨c, le_of_lt hc⟩ hx
add_mem' _ hx _ hy := S.add_mem hx hy
instance : Coe (PointedCone 𝕜 E) (ConvexCone 𝕜 E) where
coe := toConvexCone
theorem toConvexCone_injective : Injective ((↑) : PointedCone 𝕜 E → ConvexCone 𝕜 E) :=
fun _ _ => by simp [toConvexCone]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Cone/Pointed.lean | 51 | 52 | theorem toConvexCone_pointed (S : PointedCone 𝕜 E) : (S : ConvexCone 𝕜 E).Pointed := by |
simp [toConvexCone, ConvexCone.Pointed]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
#align_import combinatorics.set_family.compression.uv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6f8ab7de1c4b78a68ab8cf7dd83d549eb78a68a1"
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
#align sup_sdiff_inj_on sup_sdiff_injOn
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)] {s : Finset α} {u v a b : α}
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
#align uv.compress UV.compress
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
#align uv.compress_of_disjoint_of_le UV.compress_of_disjoint_of_le
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
#align uv.compress_of_disjoint_of_le' UV.compress_of_disjoint_of_le'
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
#align uv.compress_self UV.compress_self
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
#align uv.compress_sdiff_sdiff UV.compress_sdiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_iff.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
#align uv.compress_idem UV.compress_idem
variable [DecidableEq α]
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
(s.filter (compress u v · ∈ s)) ∪ (s.image <| compress u v).filter (· ∉ s)
#align uv.compression UV.compression
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
#align uv.is_compressed UV.IsCompressed
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑(s.filter (compress u v · ∉ s)) := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
#align uv.compress_inj_on UV.compress_injOn
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
#align uv.mem_compression UV.mem_compression
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
#align uv.is_compressed.eq UV.IsCompressed.eq
@[simp]
theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
· refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
exact hb' hb
#align uv.compression_self UV.compression_self
theorem isCompressed_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : IsCompressed u u s := compression_self u s
#align uv.is_compressed_self UV.isCompressed_self
theorem compress_disjoint :
Disjoint (s.filter (compress u v · ∈ s)) ((s.image <| compress u v).filter (· ∉ s)) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha₁ ha₂ ↦ (mem_filter.1 ha₂).2 (mem_filter.1 ha₁).1
#align uv.compress_disjoint UV.compress_disjoint
theorem compress_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ s) : compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression]
by_cases h : compress u v a ∈ s
· rw [compress_idem]
exact Or.inl ⟨h, h⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨h, a, ha, rfl⟩
#align uv.compress_mem_compression UV.compress_mem_compression
-- This is a special case of `compress_mem_compression` once we have `compression_idem`.
theorem compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression (ha : a ∈ 𝓒 u v s) :
compress u v a ∈ 𝓒 u v s := by
rw [mem_compression] at ha ⊢
simp only [compress_idem, exists_prop]
obtain ⟨_, ha⟩ | ⟨_, b, hb, rfl⟩ := ha
· exact Or.inl ⟨ha, ha⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [compress_idem], b, hb, (compress_idem _ _ _).symm⟩
#align uv.compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression UV.compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression
@[simp]
theorem compression_idem (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u v (𝓒 u v s) = 𝓒 u v s := by
have h : filter (compress u v · ∉ 𝓒 u v s) (𝓒 u v s) = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun a ha h ↦ h <| compress_mem_compression_of_mem_compression ha
rw [compression, filter_image, h, image_empty, ← h]
exact filter_union_filter_neg_eq _ (compression u v s)
#align uv.compression_idem UV.compression_idem
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 214 | 217 | theorem card_compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) : (𝓒 u v s).card = s.card := by |
rw [compression, card_union_of_disjoint compress_disjoint, filter_image,
card_image_of_injOn compress_injOn, ← card_union_of_disjoint (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s _ _),
filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
|
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Alter
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] fold foldl foldr Any forM foldlM Ordered
@[simp] theorem min?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.min? = t.max? := by
unfold RBNode.max?; split <;> simp [RBNode.min?]
unfold RBNode.min?; rw [min?.match_1.eq_3]
· apply min?_reverse
· simpa [reverse_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem max?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.max? = t.min? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_nil {x} : ¬x ∈ (.nil : RBNode α) := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
@[simp] theorem mem_node {y c a x b} :
y ∈ (.node c a x b : RBNode α) ↔ y = x ∨ y ∈ a ∨ y ∈ b := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
theorem All_def {t : RBNode α} : t.All p ↔ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_imp, forall_and, *]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/Lemmas.lean | 35 | 36 | theorem Any_def {t : RBNode α} : t.Any p ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, p x := by |
induction t <;> simp [or_and_right, exists_or, *]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Finite
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Subfield
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.RankNullity
#align_import linear_algebra.dimension from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47a5f8186becdbc826190ced4312f8199f9db6a5"
noncomputable section
universe u₀ u v v' v'' u₁' w w'
variable {K R : Type u} {V V₁ V₂ V₃ : Type v} {V' V'₁ : Type v'} {V'' : Type v''}
variable {ι : Type w} {ι' : Type w'} {η : Type u₁'} {φ : η → Type*}
open Cardinal Basis Submodule Function Set
section Module
section Cardinal
variable (K)
variable [DivisionRing K]
theorem max_aleph0_card_le_rank_fun_nat : max ℵ₀ #K ≤ Module.rank K (ℕ → K) := by
have aleph0_le : ℵ₀ ≤ Module.rank K (ℕ → K) := (rank_finsupp_self K ℕ).symm.trans_le
(Finsupp.lcoeFun.rank_le_of_injective <| by exact DFunLike.coe_injective)
refine max_le aleph0_le ?_
obtain card_K | card_K := le_or_lt #K ℵ₀
· exact card_K.trans aleph0_le
by_contra!
obtain ⟨⟨ιK, bK⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := ℕ → K)
let L := Subfield.closure (Set.range (fun i : ιK × ℕ ↦ bK i.1 i.2))
have hLK : #L < #K := by
refine (Subfield.cardinal_mk_closure_le_max _).trans_lt
(max_lt_iff.mpr ⟨mk_range_le.trans_lt ?_, card_K⟩)
rwa [mk_prod, ← aleph0, lift_uzero, bK.mk_eq_rank'', mul_aleph0_eq aleph0_le]
letI := Module.compHom K (RingHom.op L.subtype)
obtain ⟨⟨ιL, bL⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := Lᵐᵒᵖ) (M := K)
have card_ιL : ℵ₀ ≤ #ιL := by
contrapose! hLK
haveI := @Fintype.ofFinite _ (lt_aleph0_iff_finite.mp hLK)
rw [bL.repr.toEquiv.cardinal_eq, mk_finsupp_of_fintype,
← MulOpposite.opEquiv.cardinal_eq] at card_K ⊢
apply power_nat_le
contrapose! card_K
exact (power_lt_aleph0 card_K <| nat_lt_aleph0 _).le
obtain ⟨e⟩ := lift_mk_le'.mp (card_ιL.trans_eq (lift_uzero #ιL).symm)
have rep_e := bK.total_repr (bL ∘ e)
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum] at rep_e
set c := bK.repr (bL ∘ e)
set s := c.support
let f i (j : s) : L := ⟨bK j i, Subfield.subset_closure ⟨(j, i), rfl⟩⟩
have : ¬LinearIndependent Lᵐᵒᵖ f := fun h ↦ by
have := h.cardinal_lift_le_rank
rw [lift_uzero, (LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun _ ↦ MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv Lᵐᵒᵖ).rank_eq,
rank_fun'] at this
exact (nat_lt_aleph0 _).not_le this
obtain ⟨t, g, eq0, i, hi, hgi⟩ := not_linearIndependent_iff.mp this
refine hgi (linearIndependent_iff'.mp (bL.linearIndependent.comp e e.injective) t g ?_ i hi)
clear_value c s
simp_rw [← rep_e, Finset.sum_apply, Pi.smul_apply, Finset.smul_sum]
rw [Finset.sum_comm]
refine Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi ↦ ?_
replace eq0 := congr_arg L.subtype (congr_fun eq0 ⟨i, hi⟩)
rw [Finset.sum_apply, map_sum] at eq0
have : SMulCommClass Lᵐᵒᵖ K K := ⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ mul_assoc _ _ _⟩
simp_rw [smul_comm _ (c i), ← Finset.smul_sum]
erw [eq0, smul_zero]
variable {K}
open Function in
theorem rank_fun_infinite {ι : Type v} [hι : Infinite ι] : Module.rank K (ι → K) = #(ι → K) := by
obtain ⟨⟨ιK, bK⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := ι → K)
obtain ⟨e⟩ := lift_mk_le'.mp ((aleph0_le_mk_iff.mpr hι).trans_eq (lift_uzero #ι).symm)
have := LinearMap.lift_rank_le_of_injective _ <|
LinearMap.funLeft_injective_of_surjective K K _ (invFun_surjective e.injective)
rw [lift_umax.{u,v}, lift_id'.{u,v}] at this
have key := (lift_le.{v}.mpr <| max_aleph0_card_le_rank_fun_nat K).trans this
rw [lift_max, lift_aleph0, max_le_iff] at key
haveI : Infinite ιK := by
rw [← aleph0_le_mk_iff, bK.mk_eq_rank'']; exact key.1
rw [bK.repr.toEquiv.cardinal_eq, mk_finsupp_lift_of_infinite,
lift_umax.{u,v}, lift_id'.{u,v}, bK.mk_eq_rank'', eq_comm, max_eq_left]
exact key.2
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/DivisionRing.lean | 304 | 311 | theorem rank_dual_eq_card_dual_of_aleph0_le_rank' {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V]
(h : ℵ₀ ≤ Module.rank K V) : Module.rank Kᵐᵒᵖ (V →ₗ[K] K) = #(V →ₗ[K] K) := by |
obtain ⟨⟨ι, b⟩⟩ := Module.Free.exists_basis (R := K) (M := V)
rw [← b.mk_eq_rank'', aleph0_le_mk_iff] at h
have e := (b.constr Kᵐᵒᵖ (M' := K)).symm.trans
(LinearEquiv.piCongrRight fun _ ↦ MulOpposite.opLinearEquiv Kᵐᵒᵖ)
rw [e.rank_eq, e.toEquiv.cardinal_eq]
apply rank_fun_infinite
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Sublists
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
#align_import data.multiset.powerset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
namespace Multiset
open List
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: Write a more efficient version
def powersetAux (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists l).map (↑)
#align multiset.powerset_aux Multiset.powersetAux
theorem powersetAux_eq_map_coe {l : List α} : powersetAux l = (sublists l).map (↑) :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux_eq_map_coe Multiset.powersetAux_eq_map_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_powersetAux {l : List α} {s} : s ∈ powersetAux l ↔ s ≤ ↑l :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp [powersetAux_eq_map_coe, Subperm, and_comm]
#align multiset.mem_powerset_aux Multiset.mem_powersetAux
def powersetAux' (l : List α) : List (Multiset α) :=
(sublists' l).map (↑)
#align multiset.powerset_aux' Multiset.powersetAux'
theorem powersetAux_perm_powersetAux' {l : List α} : powersetAux l ~ powersetAux' l := by
rw [powersetAux_eq_map_coe]; exact (sublists_perm_sublists' _).map _
#align multiset.powerset_aux_perm_powerset_aux' Multiset.powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_nil : powersetAux' (@nil α) = [0] :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_nil Multiset.powersetAux'_nil
@[simp]
theorem powersetAux'_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
powersetAux' (a :: l) = powersetAux' l ++ List.map (cons a) (powersetAux' l) := by
simp only [powersetAux', sublists'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_cancel_left_eq]; rfl
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_cons Multiset.powersetAux'_cons
theorem powerset_aux'_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux' l₁ ~ powersetAux' l₂ := by
induction' p with a l₁ l₂ p IH a b l l₁ l₂ l₃ _ _ IH₁ IH₂
· simp
· simp only [powersetAux'_cons]
exact IH.append (IH.map _)
· simp only [powersetAux'_cons, map_append, List.map_map, append_assoc]
apply Perm.append_left
rw [← append_assoc, ← append_assoc,
(by funext s; simp [cons_swap] : cons b ∘ cons a = cons a ∘ cons b)]
exact perm_append_comm.append_right _
· exact IH₁.trans IH₂
#align multiset.powerset_aux'_perm Multiset.powerset_aux'_perm
theorem powersetAux_perm {l₁ l₂ : List α} (p : l₁ ~ l₂) : powersetAux l₁ ~ powersetAux l₂ :=
powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.trans <|
(powerset_aux'_perm p).trans powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.symm
#align multiset.powerset_aux_perm Multiset.powersetAux_perm
--Porting note (#11083): slightly slower implementation due to `map ofList`
def powerset (s : Multiset α) : Multiset (Multiset α) :=
Quot.liftOn s
(fun l => (powersetAux l : Multiset (Multiset α)))
(fun _ _ h => Quot.sound (powersetAux_perm h))
#align multiset.powerset Multiset.powerset
theorem powerset_coe (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
congr_arg ((↑) : List (Multiset α) → Multiset (Multiset α)) powersetAux_eq_map_coe
#align multiset.powerset_coe Multiset.powerset_coe
@[simp]
theorem powerset_coe' (l : List α) : @powerset α l = ((sublists' l).map (↑) : List (Multiset α)) :=
Quot.sound powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'
#align multiset.powerset_coe' Multiset.powerset_coe'
@[simp]
theorem powerset_zero : @powerset α 0 = {0} :=
rfl
#align multiset.powerset_zero Multiset.powerset_zero
@[simp]
theorem powerset_cons (a : α) (s) : powerset (a ::ₘ s) = powerset s + map (cons a) (powerset s) :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe, cons_coe, powerset_coe', sublists'_cons, map_append, List.map_map,
map_coe, coe_add, coe_eq_coe]; rfl
#align multiset.powerset_cons Multiset.powerset_cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {s t : Multiset α} : s ∈ powerset t ↔ s ≤ t :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ s t <| by simp [Subperm, and_comm]
#align multiset.mem_powerset Multiset.mem_powerset
theorem map_single_le_powerset (s : Multiset α) : s.map singleton ≤ powerset s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s fun l => by
simp only [powerset_coe, quot_mk_to_coe, coe_le, map_coe]
show l.map (((↑) : List α → Multiset α) ∘ pure) <+~ (sublists l).map (↑)
rw [← List.map_map]
exact ((map_pure_sublist_sublists _).map _).subperm
#align multiset.map_single_le_powerset Multiset.map_single_le_powerset
@[simp]
theorem card_powerset (s : Multiset α) : card (powerset s) = 2 ^ card s :=
Quotient.inductionOn s <| by simp
#align multiset.card_powerset Multiset.card_powerset
theorem revzip_powersetAux {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux l)) : x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux_eq_map_coe, ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists _ _ _ h)
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux Multiset.revzip_powersetAux
theorem revzip_powersetAux' {l : List α} ⦃x⦄ (h : x ∈ revzip (powersetAux' l)) :
x.1 + x.2 = ↑l := by
rw [revzip, powersetAux', ← map_reverse, zip_map, ← revzip, List.mem_map] at h
simp only [Prod.map_apply, Prod.exists] at h
rcases h with ⟨l₁, l₂, h, rfl, rfl⟩
exact Quot.sound (revzip_sublists' _ _ _ h)
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux' Multiset.revzip_powersetAux'
theorem revzip_powersetAux_lemma {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {l' : List (Multiset α)}
(H : ∀ ⦃x : _ × _⦄, x ∈ revzip l' → x.1 + x.2 = ↑l) :
revzip l' = l'.map fun x => (x, (l : Multiset α) - x) := by
have :
Forall₂ (fun (p : Multiset α × Multiset α) (s : Multiset α) => p = (s, ↑l - s)) (revzip l')
((revzip l').map Prod.fst) := by
rw [forall₂_map_right_iff, forall₂_same]
rintro ⟨s, t⟩ h
dsimp
rw [← H h, add_tsub_cancel_left]
rw [← forall₂_eq_eq_eq, forall₂_map_right_iff]
simpa using this
#align multiset.revzip_powerset_aux_lemma Multiset.revzip_powersetAux_lemma
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Powerset.lean | 154 | 158 | theorem revzip_powersetAux_perm_aux' {l : List α} :
revzip (powersetAux l) ~ revzip (powersetAux' l) := by |
haveI := Classical.decEq α
rw [revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux, revzip_powersetAux_lemma l revzip_powersetAux']
exact powersetAux_perm_powersetAux'.map _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
#align polynomial.roots Polynomial.roots
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
-- porting noteL `‹_›` doesn't work for instance arguments
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
#align polynomial.roots_def Polynomial.roots_def
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align polynomial.roots_zero Polynomial.roots_zero
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
#align polynomial.card_roots Polynomial.card_roots
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
#align polynomial.card_roots' Polynomial.card_roots'
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.card_roots_sub_C'
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
#align polynomial.count_roots Polynomial.count_roots
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
#align polynomial.mem_roots' Polynomial.mem_roots'
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
#align polynomial.mem_roots Polynomial.mem_roots
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
#align polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots Polynomial.ne_zero_of_mem_roots
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
#align polynomial.is_root_of_mem_roots Polynomial.isRoot_of_mem_roots
-- Porting note: added during port.
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots w, IsRoot.def, aeval_def, eval₂_eq_eval_map]
simp
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
Z.card ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
#align polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots Polynomial.card_le_degree_of_subset_roots
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align polynomial.finite_set_of_is_root Polynomial.finite_setOf_isRoot
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_is_root Polynomial.eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_max_root Polynomial.exists_max_root
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
#align polynomial.exists_min_root Polynomial.exists_min_root
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq Polynomial.eq_of_infinite_eval_eq
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
#align polynomial.roots_mul Polynomial.roots_mul
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
#align polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd Polynomial.roots.le_of_dvd
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C' Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C'
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C Polynomial.mem_roots_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X Polynomial.roots_X
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C Polynomial.roots_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
#align polynomial.roots_one Polynomial.roots_one
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul Polynomial.roots_C_mul
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
#align polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero Polynomial.roots_smul_nonzero
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
#align polynomial.roots_list_prod Polynomial.roots_list_prod
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
#align polynomial.roots_multiset_prod Polynomial.roots_multiset_prod
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
#align polynomial.roots_prod Polynomial.roots_prod
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction' n with n ihn
· rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
· rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
#align polynomial.roots_pow Polynomial.roots_pow
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_X_pow Polynomial.roots_X_pow
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.roots_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
#align polynomial.roots_monomial Polynomial.roots_monomial
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_prod_X_sub_C
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C Polynomial.roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.card_roots_X_pow_sub_C Polynomial.card_roots_X_pow_sub_C
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
#align polynomial.zero_of_eval_zero Polynomial.zero_of_eval_zero
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
#align polynomial.funext Polynomial.funext
variable [CommRing T]
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(NoZeroSMulDivisors.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (a : T) : (C a).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [aroots_def, map_C, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_zero (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : (0 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 := by
rw [← C_0, aroots_C]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_one [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
(1 : T[X]).aroots S = 0 :=
aroots_C 1
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 461 | 463 | theorem aroots_neg [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] (p : T[X]) :
(-p).aroots S = p.aroots S := by |
rw [aroots, Polynomial.map_neg, roots_neg]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Irrational
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactification.OnePoint
#align_import topology.instances.rat_lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
open Set Metric Filter TopologicalSpace
open Topology OnePoint
local notation "ℚ∞" => OnePoint ℚ
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ} {s t : Set ℚ}
theorem interior_compact_eq_empty (hs : IsCompact s) : interior s = ∅ :=
denseEmbedding_coe_real.toDenseInducing.interior_compact_eq_empty dense_irrational hs
#align rat.interior_compact_eq_empty Rat.interior_compact_eq_empty
theorem dense_compl_compact (hs : IsCompact s) : Dense sᶜ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.1 (interior_compact_eq_empty hs)
#align rat.dense_compl_compact Rat.dense_compl_compact
instance cocompact_inf_nhds_neBot : NeBot (cocompact ℚ ⊓ 𝓝 p) := by
refine (hasBasis_cocompact.inf (nhds_basis_opens _)).neBot_iff.2 ?_
rintro ⟨s, o⟩ ⟨hs, hpo, ho⟩; rw [inter_comm]
exact (dense_compl_compact hs).inter_open_nonempty _ ho ⟨p, hpo⟩
#align rat.cocompact_inf_nhds_ne_bot Rat.cocompact_inf_nhds_neBot
theorem not_countably_generated_cocompact : ¬IsCountablyGenerated (cocompact ℚ) := by
intro H
rcases exists_seq_tendsto (cocompact ℚ ⊓ 𝓝 0) with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [tendsto_inf] at hx; rcases hx with ⟨hxc, hx0⟩
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n : ℕ, x n ∉ insert (0 : ℚ) (range x) :=
(hxc.eventually hx0.isCompact_insert_range.compl_mem_cocompact).exists
exact hn (Or.inr ⟨n, rfl⟩)
#align rat.not_countably_generated_cocompact Rat.not_countably_generated_cocompact
theorem not_countably_generated_nhds_infty_opc : ¬IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 (∞ : ℚ∞)) := by
intro
have : IsCountablyGenerated (comap (OnePoint.some : ℚ → ℚ∞) (𝓝 ∞)) := by infer_instance
rw [OnePoint.comap_coe_nhds_infty, coclosedCompact_eq_cocompact] at this
exact not_countably_generated_cocompact this
#align rat.not_countably_generated_nhds_infty_alexandroff Rat.not_countably_generated_nhds_infty_opc
theorem not_firstCountableTopology_opc : ¬FirstCountableTopology ℚ∞ := by
intro
exact not_countably_generated_nhds_infty_opc inferInstance
#align rat.not_first_countable_topology_alexandroff Rat.not_firstCountableTopology_opc
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/RatLemmas.lean | 77 | 79 | theorem not_secondCountableTopology_opc : ¬SecondCountableTopology ℚ∞ := by |
intro
exact not_firstCountableTopology_opc inferInstance
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
local macro:max "local_hAdd[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HAdd.hAdd : $type → $type → $type))
local macro:max "local_hMul[" type:term ", " inst:term "]" : term =>
`(term| (letI := $inst; HMul.hMul : $type → $type → $type))
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
@[ext] theorem AddMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have h_monoid : inst₁.toAddMonoid = inst₂.toAddMonoid := by ext : 1; exact h_add
have h_zero' : inst₁.toZero = inst₂.toZero := congrArg (·.toZero) h_monoid
have h_one' : inst₁.toOne = inst₂.toOne :=
congrArg One.mk h_one
have h_natCast : inst₁.toNatCast.natCast = inst₂.toNatCast.natCast := by
funext n; induction n with
| zero => rewrite [inst₁.natCast_zero, inst₂.natCast_zero]
exact congrArg (@Zero.zero R) h_zero'
| succ n h => rw [inst₁.natCast_succ, inst₂.natCast_succ, h_add]
exact congrArg₂ _ h h_one
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective :
Function.Injective (@AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne R) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommMonoidWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommMonoidWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one : R)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ :=
AddCommMonoidWithOne.toAddMonoidWithOne_injective <|
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
@[ext] theorem AddGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddMonoidWithOne = inst₂.toAddMonoidWithOne :=
AddMonoidWithOne.ext h_add h_one
have : inst₁.toNatCast = inst₂.toNatCast := congrArg (·.toNatCast) this
have h_group : inst₁.toAddGroup = inst₂.toAddGroup := by ext : 1; exact h_add
-- Extract equality of necessary substructures from h_group
injection h_group with h_group; injection h_group
have : inst₁.toIntCast.intCast = inst₂.toIntCast.intCast := by
funext n; cases n with
| ofNat n => rewrite [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, inst₁.intCast_ofNat, inst₂.intCast_ofNat]; congr
| negSucc n => rewrite [inst₁.intCast_negSucc, inst₂.intCast_negSucc]; congr
rcases inst₁ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩; rcases inst₂ with @⟨⟨⟩⟩
congr
@[ext] theorem AddCommGroupWithOne.ext ⦃inst₁ inst₂ : AddCommGroupWithOne R⦄
(h_add : local_hAdd[R, inst₁] = local_hAdd[R, inst₂])
(h_one : (letI := inst₁; One.one : R) = (letI := inst₂; One.one)) :
inst₁ = inst₂ := by
have : inst₁.toAddCommGroup = inst₂.toAddCommGroup :=
AddCommGroup.ext h_add
have : inst₁.toAddGroupWithOne = inst₂.toAddGroupWithOne :=
AddGroupWithOne.ext h_add h_one
injection this with _ h_addMonoidWithOne; injection h_addMonoidWithOne
cases inst₁; cases inst₂
congr
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommSemiring` in Mathlib.
-- At present, there is no `NonAssocCommRing` in Mathlib.
namespace CommRing
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Ext.lean | 519 | 520 | theorem toRing_injective : Function.Injective (@toRing R) := by |
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ _; congr
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.Tangent
#align_import geometry.manifold.mfderiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e473c3198bb41f68560cab68a0529c854b618833"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Manifold
open Set ChartedSpace
section DerivativesDefinitions
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {M' : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
def DifferentiableWithinAtProp (f : H → H') (s : Set H) (x : H) : Prop :=
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ Set.range I) (I x)
#align differentiable_within_at_prop DifferentiableWithinAtProp
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Defs.lean | 134 | 177 | theorem differentiable_within_at_localInvariantProp :
(contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).LocalInvariantProp (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I')
(DifferentiableWithinAtProp I I') :=
{ is_local := by |
intro s x u f u_open xu
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ u) ∩ Set.range I = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ Set.range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' u := by
simp only [Set.inter_right_comm, Set.preimage_inter]
rw [DifferentiableWithinAtProp, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, this]
symm
apply differentiableWithinAt_inter
have : u ∈ 𝓝 (I.symm (I x)) := by
rw [ModelWithCorners.left_inv]
exact u_open.mem_nhds xu
apply I.continuous_symm.continuousAt this
right_invariance' := by
intro s x f e he hx h
rw [DifferentiableWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have : I x = (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I (e x)) := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
rw [this] at h
have : I (e x) ∈ I.symm ⁻¹' e.target ∩ Set.range I := by simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he).2.contDiffWithinAt this
convert (h.comp' _ (this.differentiableWithinAt le_top)).mono_of_mem _ using 1
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
refine
mem_nhdsWithin.mpr
⟨I.symm ⁻¹' e.target, e.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm, by
simp_rw [Set.mem_preimage, I.left_inv, e.mapsTo hx], ?_⟩
mfld_set_tac
congr_of_forall := by
intro s x f g h hx hf
apply hf.congr
· intro y hy
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy
simp only [h, hy, mfld_simps]
· simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
left_invariance' := by
intro s x f e' he' hs hx h
rw [DifferentiableWithinAtProp] at h ⊢
have A : (I' ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I x) ∈ I'.symm ⁻¹' e'.source ∩ Set.range I' := by
simp only [hx, mfld_simps]
have := (mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.2 he').1.contDiffWithinAt A
convert (this.differentiableWithinAt le_top).comp _ h _
· ext y; simp only [mfld_simps]
· intro y hy; simp only [mfld_simps] at hy; simpa only [hy, mfld_simps] using hs hy.1 }
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Opposites
#align_import category_theory.eq_to_hom from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
def eqToHom {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : X ⟶ Y := by rw [p]; exact 𝟙 _
#align category_theory.eq_to_hom CategoryTheory.eqToHom
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_refl (X : C) (p : X = X) : eqToHom p = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
#align category_theory.eq_to_hom_refl CategoryTheory.eqToHom_refl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem eqToHom_trans {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y = Z) :
eqToHom p ≫ eqToHom q = eqToHom (p.trans q) := by
cases p
cases q
simp
#align category_theory.eq_to_hom_trans CategoryTheory.eqToHom_trans
theorem comp_eqToHom_iff {X Y Y' : C} (p : Y = Y') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y') :
f ≫ eqToHom p = g ↔ f = g ≫ eqToHom p.symm :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => by simp [eq_whisker h (eqToHom p)] }
#align category_theory.comp_eq_to_hom_iff CategoryTheory.comp_eqToHom_iff
theorem eqToHom_comp_iff {X X' Y : C} (p : X = X') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y) :
eqToHom p ≫ g = f ↔ g = eqToHom p.symm ≫ f :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => h ▸ by simp [whisker_eq _ h] }
#align category_theory.eq_to_hom_comp_iff CategoryTheory.eqToHom_comp_iff
variable {β : Sort*}
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
z j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ z j' := by
cases w
simp
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_iso_hom_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
(z j).hom ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ (z j').hom := by
cases w
simp
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
theorem eqToHom_iso_inv_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ≅ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
(z j).inv ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ (z j').inv := by
cases w
simp
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/EqToHom.lean | 104 | 107 | theorem congrArg_cast_hom_left {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y ⟶ Z) :
cast (congrArg (fun W : C => W ⟶ Z) p.symm) q = eqToHom p ≫ q := by |
cases p
simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Canonical
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Preserves
universe v u w
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable [FinitaryPreExtensive C]
class Presieve.Extensive {X : C} (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
arrows_nonempty_isColimit : ∃ (α : Type) (_ : Finite α) (Z : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (Z a ⟶ X)),
R = Presieve.ofArrows Z π ∧ Nonempty (IsColimit (Cofan.mk X π))
instance {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive] : S.hasPullbacks where
has_pullbacks := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Presieve.Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
intro _ _ _ _ _ hg
cases hg
apply FinitaryPreExtensive.hasPullbacks_of_is_coproduct hc
open Presieve Opposite
theorem isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive]
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) [PreservesFiniteProducts F] : S.IsSheafFor F := by
obtain ⟨α, _, Z, π, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
have : (ofArrows Z (Cofan.mk X π).inj).hasPullbacks :=
(inferInstance : (ofArrows Z π).hasPullbacks)
cases nonempty_fintype α
exact isSheafFor_of_preservesProduct _ _ hc
instance {α : Type} [Finite α] (Z : α → C) : (ofArrows Z (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i)).Extensive :=
⟨⟨α, inferInstance, Z, (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i), rfl, ⟨coproductIsCoproduct _⟩⟩⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/ExtensiveSheaves.lean | 64 | 70 | theorem extensiveTopology.isSheaf_yoneda_obj (W : C) : Presieve.IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C)
(yoneda.obj W) := by |
erw [isSheaf_coverage]
intro X R ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, hi⟩
have : IsIso (Sigma.desc (Cofan.inj (Cofan.mk X π))) := hi
have : R.Extensive := ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, ⟨Cofan.isColimitOfIsIsoSigmaDesc (Cofan.mk X π)⟩⟩
exact isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts _ _
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Content
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Compact
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
noncomputable section
open Set Inv Function TopologicalSpace MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal Classical ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
namespace haar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
@[to_additive addIndex "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index`"]
noncomputable def index (K V : Set G) : ℕ :=
sInf <| Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex
@[to_additive addIndex_empty]
theorem index_empty {V : Set G} : index ∅ V = 0 := by
simp only [index, Nat.sInf_eq_zero]; left; use ∅
simp only [Finset.card_empty, empty_subset, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_empty
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar`"]
noncomputable def prehaar (K₀ U : Set G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
(index (K : Set G) U : ℝ) / index K₀ U
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⊥ = 0 := by
rw [prehaar, Compacts.coe_bot, index_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_div]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G) :
0 ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by apply div_nonneg <;> norm_cast <;> apply zero_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_nonneg
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct`"]
def haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
pi univ fun K => Icc 0 <| index (K : Set G) K₀
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addHaarProduct
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_prehaar_empty {K₀ : Set G} {f : Compacts G → ℝ} :
f ∈ haarProduct K₀ ↔ ∀ K : Compacts G, f K ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) (index (K : Set G) K₀) := by
simp only [haarProduct, Set.pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_addPrehaar_empty
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar`"]
def clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
closure <| prehaar K₀ '' { U : Set G | U ⊆ V.1 ∧ IsOpen U ∧ (1 : G) ∈ U }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clAddPrehaar
variable [TopologicalGroup G]
@[to_additive addIndex_defined
"If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined, there is
a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties."]
theorem index_defined {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ n : ℕ, n ∈ Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V } := by
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK hV with ⟨t, ht⟩; exact ⟨t.card, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_defined
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_defined
@[to_additive addIndex_elim]
theorem index_elim {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Finset G, (K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) ∧ Finset.card t = index K V := by
have := Nat.sInf_mem (index_defined hK hV); rwa [mem_image] at this
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_elim
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_elim
@[to_additive le_addIndex_mul]
theorem le_index_mul (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K : Set G) V ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ * index (K₀ : Set G) V := by
obtain ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩ := index_elim K.isCompact K₀.interior_nonempty
obtain ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩ := index_elim K₀.isCompact hV
rw [← h2s, ← h2t, mul_comm]
refine le_trans ?_ Finset.card_mul_le
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans h1s ?_
apply iUnion₂_subset; intro g₁ hg₁; rw [preimage_subset_iff]; intro g₂ hg₂
have := h1t hg₂
rcases this with ⟨_, ⟨g₃, rfl⟩, A, ⟨hg₃, rfl⟩, h2V⟩; rw [mem_preimage, ← mul_assoc] at h2V
exact mem_biUnion (Finset.mul_mem_mul hg₃ hg₁) h2V
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_index_mul
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_add_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_addIndex_mul
@[to_additive addIndex_pos]
theorem index_pos (K : PositiveCompacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
0 < index (K : Set G) V := by
unfold index; rw [Nat.sInf_def, Nat.find_pos, mem_image]
· rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩; rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at h2t; subst h2t
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := K.interior_nonempty
show g ∈ (∅ : Set G)
convert h1t (interior_subset hg); symm
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty]
· exact index_defined K.isCompact hV
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_pos
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_pos
@[to_additive addIndex_mono]
theorem index_mono {K K' V : Set G} (hK' : IsCompact K') (h : K ⊆ K') (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index K V ≤ index K' V := by
rcases index_elim hK' hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]; exact ⟨s, Subset.trans h h1s, h2s⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_mono
@[to_additive addIndex_union_le]
theorem index_union_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V ≤ index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
rcases index_elim K₁.2 hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
rcases index_elim K₂.2 hV with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← h2s, ← h2t]
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.card_union_le _ _)
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
apply union_subset <;> refine Subset.trans (by assumption) ?_ <;>
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left <;> intro g hg <;> simp only [mem_def] at hg <;>
simp only [mem_def, Multiset.mem_union, Finset.union_val, hg, or_true_iff, true_or_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_union_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_union_le
@[to_additive addIndex_union_eq]
theorem index_union_eq (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * V⁻¹) (K₂.1 * V⁻¹)) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V = index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
apply le_antisymm (index_union_le K₁ K₂ hV)
rcases index_elim (K₁.2.union K₂.2) hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
have :
∀ K : Set G,
(K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ s, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) →
index K V ≤ (s.filter fun g => ((fun h : G => g * h) ⁻¹' V ∩ K).Nonempty).card := by
intro K hK; apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
intro g hg; rcases hK hg with ⟨_, ⟨g₀, rfl⟩, _, ⟨h1g₀, rfl⟩, h2g₀⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h2g₀
simp only [mem_iUnion]; use g₀; constructor; swap
· simp only [Finset.mem_filter, h1g₀, true_and_iff]; use g
simp only [hg, h2g₀, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, and_self_iff]
exact h2g₀
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (this K₁.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_left h1s)
(this K₂.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_right h1s)) ?_
rw [← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint, Finset.filter_union_right]
· exact s.card_filter_le _
apply Finset.disjoint_filter.mpr
rintro g₁ _ ⟨g₂, h1g₂, h2g₂⟩ ⟨g₃, h1g₃, h2g₃⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h1g₃ h1g₂
refine h.le_bot (?_ : g₁⁻¹ ∈ _)
constructor <;> simp only [Set.mem_inv, Set.mem_mul, exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₂, (g₁ * g₂)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₂]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₃, (g₁ * g₃)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₃]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_union_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_union_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_union_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_union_eq
@[to_additive add_left_addIndex_le]
theorem mul_left_index_le {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(g : G) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V ≤ index K V := by
rcases index_elim hK hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]
refine ⟨s.map (Equiv.mulRight g⁻¹).toEmbedding, ?_, Finset.card_map _⟩
simp only [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans (image_subset _ h1s) ?_
rintro _ ⟨g₁, ⟨_, ⟨g₂, rfl⟩, ⟨_, ⟨hg₂, rfl⟩, hg₁⟩⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at hg₁;
simp only [exists_prop, mem_iUnion, Finset.mem_map, Equiv.coe_mulRight,
exists_exists_and_eq_and, mem_preimage, Equiv.toEmbedding_apply]
refine ⟨_, hg₂, ?_⟩; simp only [mul_assoc, hg₁, inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mul_left_index_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mul_left_index_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_left_add_index_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.add_left_addIndex_le
@[to_additive is_left_invariant_addIndex]
theorem is_left_invariant_index {K : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (g : G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) : index ((fun h => g * h) '' K) V = index K V := by
refine le_antisymm (mul_left_index_le hK hV g) ?_
convert mul_left_index_le (hK.image <| continuous_mul_left g) hV g⁻¹
rw [image_image]; symm; convert image_id' _ with h; apply inv_mul_cancel_left
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_addIndex
@[to_additive add_prehaar_le_addIndex]
theorem prehaar_le_index (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ := by
unfold prehaar; rw [div_le_iff] <;> norm_cast
· apply le_index_mul K₀ K hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_le_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_le_index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_le_add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.add_prehaar_le_addIndex
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_pos (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) {K : Set G}
(h1K : IsCompact K) (h2K : (interior K).Nonempty) : 0 < prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⟨K, h1K⟩ := by
apply div_pos <;> norm_cast
· apply index_pos ⟨⟨K, h1K⟩, h2K⟩ hU
· exact index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_pos
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_pos
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_mono {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty)
{K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂.1) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_le_div_right]
· exact mod_cast index_mono K₂.2 h hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₀.toCompacts = 1 :=
div_self <| ne_of_gt <| mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_self
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_self
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_sup_le {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G)
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ + prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_add_div_same, div_le_div_right]
· exact mod_cast index_union_le K₁ K₂ hU
· exact mod_cast index_pos K₀ hU
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_sup_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_sup_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_sup_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_sup_le
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_sup_eq {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} {K₁ K₂ : Compacts G}
(hU : (interior U).Nonempty) (h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * U⁻¹) (K₂.1 * U⁻¹)) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₁ + prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K₂ := by
simp only [prehaar]; rw [div_add_div_same]
-- Porting note: Here was `congr`, but `to_additive` failed to generate a theorem.
refine congr_arg (fun x : ℝ => x / index K₀ U) ?_
exact mod_cast index_union_eq K₁ K₂ hU h
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_sup_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_sup_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_sup_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_sup_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem is_left_invariant_prehaar {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty)
(g : G) (K : Compacts G) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by
simp only [prehaar, Compacts.coe_map, is_left_invariant_index K.isCompact _ hU]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_prehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_addPrehaar
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_mem_haarProduct (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (hU : (interior U).Nonempty) :
prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ∈ haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) := by
rintro ⟨K, hK⟩ _; rw [mem_Icc]; exact ⟨prehaar_nonneg K₀ _, prehaar_le_index K₀ _ hU⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_mem_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_mem_haarProduct
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_mem_add_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_mem_addHaarProduct
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) :
(haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) ∩ ⋂ V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G), clPrehaar K₀ V).Nonempty := by
have : IsCompact (haarProduct (K₀ : Set G)) := by
apply isCompact_univ_pi; intro K; apply isCompact_Icc
refine this.inter_iInter_nonempty (clPrehaar K₀) (fun s => isClosed_closure) fun t => ?_
let V₀ := ⋂ V ∈ t, (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)).carrier
have h1V₀ : IsOpen V₀ := isOpen_biInter_finset <| by rintro ⟨⟨V, hV₁⟩, hV₂⟩ _; exact hV₁
have h2V₀ : (1 : G) ∈ V₀ := by simp only [V₀, mem_iInter]; rintro ⟨⟨V, hV₁⟩, hV₂⟩ _; exact hV₂
refine ⟨prehaar K₀ V₀, ?_⟩
constructor
· apply prehaar_mem_haarProduct K₀; use 1; rwa [h1V₀.interior_eq]
· simp only [mem_iInter]; rintro ⟨V, hV⟩ h2V; apply subset_closure
apply mem_image_of_mem; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
exact ⟨Subset.trans (iInter_subset _ ⟨V, hV⟩) (iInter_subset _ h2V), h1V₀, h2V₀⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.nonempty_Inter_cl_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.nonempty_Inter_cl_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.nonempty_iInter_clAddPrehaar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
@[to_additive addCHaar "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar`"]
noncomputable def chaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
Classical.choose (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀) K
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar
@[to_additive addCHaar_mem_addHaarProduct]
theorem chaar_mem_haarProduct (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ ∈ haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) :=
(Classical.choose_spec (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀)).1
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_mem_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_mem_haarProduct
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_mem_add_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_mem_addHaarProduct
@[to_additive addCHaar_mem_clAddPrehaar]
theorem chaar_mem_clPrehaar (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) :
chaar K₀ ∈ clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) V := by
have := (Classical.choose_spec (nonempty_iInter_clPrehaar K₀)).2; rw [mem_iInter] at this
exact this V
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_mem_cl_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_mem_clPrehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_mem_cl_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_mem_clAddPrehaar
@[to_additive addCHaar_nonneg]
theorem chaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) : 0 ≤ chaar K₀ K := by
have := chaar_mem_haarProduct K₀ K (mem_univ _); rw [mem_Icc] at this; exact this.1
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_nonneg
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_nonneg
@[to_additive addCHaar_empty]
theorem chaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ ⊥ = 0 := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f ⊥
have : Continuous eval := continuous_apply ⊥
show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, _, rfl⟩; apply prehaar_empty
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_empty
@[to_additive addCHaar_self]
theorem chaar_self (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : chaar K₀ K₀.toCompacts = 1 := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₀.toCompacts
have : Continuous eval := continuous_apply _
show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(1 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; apply prehaar_self
rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_self
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_self MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_self
@[to_additive addCHaar_mono]
theorem chaar_mono {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} {K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : (K₁ : Set G) ⊆ K₂) :
chaar K₀ K₁ ≤ chaar K₀ K₂ := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₂ - f K₁
have : Continuous eval := (continuous_apply K₂).sub (continuous_apply K₁)
rw [← sub_nonneg]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' Ici (0 : ℝ)
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; simp only [eval, mem_preimage, mem_Ici, sub_nonneg]
apply prehaar_mono _ h; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_Ici
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_mono
@[to_additive addCHaar_sup_le]
theorem chaar_sup_le {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) :
chaar K₀ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) ≤ chaar K₀ K₁ + chaar K₀ K₂ := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₁ + f K₂ - f (K₁ ⊔ K₂)
have : Continuous eval := by
exact ((continuous_apply K₁).add (continuous_apply K₂)).sub (continuous_apply (K₁ ⊔ K₂))
rw [← sub_nonneg]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' Ici (0 : ℝ)
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩; simp only [eval, mem_preimage, mem_Ici, sub_nonneg]
apply prehaar_sup_le; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_Ici
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_sup_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_sup_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_sup_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_sup_le
@[to_additive addCHaar_sup_eq]
theorem chaar_sup_eq {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G}
{K₁ K₂ : Compacts G} (h : Disjoint K₁.1 K₂.1) (h₂ : IsClosed K₂.1) :
chaar K₀ (K₁ ⊔ K₂) = chaar K₀ K₁ + chaar K₀ K₂ := by
rcases SeparatedNhds.of_isCompact_isCompact_isClosed K₁.2 K₂.2 h₂ h
with ⟨U₁, U₂, h1U₁, h1U₂, h2U₁, h2U₂, hU⟩
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right K₁.2 h1U₁ h2U₁ with ⟨L₁, h1L₁, h2L₁⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp h1L₁ with ⟨V₁, h1V₁, h2V₁, h3V₁⟩
replace h2L₁ := Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul_left h1V₁) h2L₁
rcases compact_open_separated_mul_right K₂.2 h1U₂ h2U₂ with ⟨L₂, h1L₂, h2L₂⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.mp h1L₂ with ⟨V₂, h1V₂, h2V₂, h3V₂⟩
replace h2L₂ := Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul_left h1V₂) h2L₂
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f K₁ + f K₂ - f (K₁ ⊔ K₂)
have : Continuous eval :=
((continuous_apply K₁).add (continuous_apply K₂)).sub (continuous_apply (K₁ ⊔ K₂))
rw [eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
let V := V₁ ∩ V₂
apply
mem_of_subset_of_mem _
(chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀
⟨⟨V⁻¹, (h2V₁.inter h2V₂).preimage continuous_inv⟩, by
simp only [V, mem_inv, inv_one, h3V₁, h3V₂, mem_inter_iff, true_and_iff]⟩)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨h1U, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [eval, mem_preimage, sub_eq_zero, mem_singleton_iff]; rw [eq_comm]
apply prehaar_sup_eq
· rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· refine disjoint_of_subset ?_ ?_ hU
· refine Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul Subset.rfl ?_) h2L₁
exact Subset.trans (inv_subset.mpr h1U) inter_subset_left
· refine Subset.trans (mul_subset_mul Subset.rfl ?_) h2L₂
exact Subset.trans (inv_subset.mpr h1U) inter_subset_right
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.chaar_sup_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.chaar_sup_eq
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_chaar_sup_eq MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addCHaar_sup_eq
@[to_additive is_left_invariant_addCHaar]
theorem is_left_invariant_chaar {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} (g : G) (K : Compacts G) :
chaar K₀ (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) = chaar K₀ K := by
let eval : (Compacts G → ℝ) → ℝ := fun f => f (K.map _ <| continuous_mul_left g) - f K
have : Continuous eval := (continuous_apply (K.map _ _)).sub (continuous_apply K)
rw [← sub_eq_zero]; show chaar K₀ ∈ eval ⁻¹' {(0 : ℝ)}
apply mem_of_subset_of_mem _ (chaar_mem_clPrehaar K₀ ⊤)
unfold clPrehaar; rw [IsClosed.closure_subset_iff]
· rintro _ ⟨U, ⟨_, h2U, h3U⟩, rfl⟩
simp only [eval, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, sub_eq_zero]
apply is_left_invariant_prehaar; rw [h2U.interior_eq]; exact ⟨1, h3U⟩
· apply continuous_iff_isClosed.mp this; exact isClosed_singleton
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_chaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_chaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.is_left_invariant_add_chaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.is_left_invariant_addCHaar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarContent`"]
noncomputable def haarContent (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) : Content G where
toFun K := ⟨chaar K₀ K, chaar_nonneg _ _⟩
mono' K₁ K₂ h := by simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.toReal, chaar_mono, h]
sup_disjoint' K₁ K₂ h _h₁ h₂ := by simp only [chaar_sup_eq h]; rfl
sup_le' K₁ K₂ := by
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_add]
simp only [NNReal.toReal, chaar_sup_le]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.haar_content MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarContent
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_haar_content MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addHaarContent
@[to_additive]
theorem haarContent_apply (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) :
haarContent K₀ K = show NNReal from ⟨chaar K₀ K, chaar_nonneg _ _⟩ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.haar_content_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarContent_apply
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_haar_content_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addHaarContent_apply
@[to_additive "The variant of `addCHaar_self` for `addHaarContent`."]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Basic.lean | 568 | 569 | theorem haarContent_self {K₀ : PositiveCompacts G} : haarContent K₀ K₀.toCompacts = 1 := by |
simp_rw [← ENNReal.coe_one, haarContent_apply, ENNReal.coe_inj, chaar_self]; rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.BigOperators
#align_import data.dfinsupp.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6623e6af705e97002a9054c1c05a980180276fc1"
universe u u₁ u₂ v v₁ v₂ v₃ w x y l
variable {ι : Type u} {γ : Type w} {β : ι → Type v} {β₁ : ι → Type v₁} {β₂ : ι → Type v₂}
variable (β)
structure DFinsupp [∀ i, Zero (β i)] : Type max u v where mk' ::
toFun : ∀ i, β i
support' : Trunc { s : Multiset ι // ∀ i, i ∈ s ∨ toFun i = 0 }
#align dfinsupp DFinsupp
variable {β}
notation3 "Π₀ "(...)", "r:(scoped f => DFinsupp f) => r
namespace DFinsupp
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₁ i)] [∀ i, Zero (β₂ i)]
instance instDFunLike : DFunLike (Π₀ i, β i) ι β :=
⟨fun f => f.toFun, fun ⟨f₁, s₁⟩ ⟨f₂, s₁⟩ ↦ fun (h : f₁ = f₂) ↦ by
subst h
congr
apply Subsingleton.elim ⟩
#align dfinsupp.fun_like DFinsupp.instDFunLike
instance : CoeFun (Π₀ i, β i) fun _ => ∀ i, β i :=
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : Π₀ i, β i) : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.to_fun_eq_coe DFinsupp.toFun_eq_coe
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : Π₀ i, β i} (h : ∀ i, f i = g i) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align dfinsupp.ext DFinsupp.ext
#align dfinsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
#align dfinsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
lemma ne_iff {f g : Π₀ i, β i} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ i, f i ≠ g i := DFunLike.ne_iff
instance : Zero (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨⟨0, Trunc.mk <| ⟨∅, fun _ => Or.inr rfl⟩⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (Π₀ i, β i) :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk' (f : ∀ i, β i) (s) : ⇑(⟨f, s⟩ : Π₀ i, β i) = f := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_mk' DFinsupp.coe_mk'
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 := rfl
#align dfinsupp.coe_zero DFinsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (i : ι) : (0 : Π₀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zero_apply DFinsupp.zero_apply
def mapRange (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) : Π₀ i, β₂ i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i),
x.support'.map fun s => ⟨s.1, fun i => (s.2 i).imp_right fun h : x i = 0 => by
rw [← hf i, ← h]⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.map_range DFinsupp.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (i : ι) :
mapRange f hf g i = f i (g i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_apply DFinsupp.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (h : ∀ i, id (0 : β₁ i) = 0 := fun i => rfl) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β₁ i) :
mapRange (fun i => (id : β₁ i → β₁ i)) h g = g := by
ext
rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_id DFinsupp.mapRange_id
theorem mapRange_comp (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (f₂ : ∀ i, β i → β₁ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0)
(hf₂ : ∀ i, f₂ i 0 = 0) (h : ∀ i, (f i ∘ f₂ i) 0 = 0) (g : Π₀ i : ι, β i) :
mapRange (fun i => f i ∘ f₂ i) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply]; rfl
#align dfinsupp.map_range_comp DFinsupp.mapRange_comp
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 = 0) :
mapRange f hf (0 : Π₀ i, β₁ i) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [mapRange_apply, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, hf]
#align dfinsupp.map_range_zero DFinsupp.mapRange_zero
def zipWith (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (x : Π₀ i, β₁ i) (y : Π₀ i, β₂ i) :
Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => f i (x i) (y i), by
refine x.support'.bind fun xs => ?_
refine y.support'.map fun ys => ?_
refine ⟨xs + ys, fun i => ?_⟩
obtain h1 | (h1 : x i = 0) := xs.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
left
exact h1
obtain h2 | (h2 : y i = 0) := ys.prop i
· left
rw [Multiset.mem_add]
right
exact h2
right; rw [← hf, ← h1, ← h2]⟩
#align dfinsupp.zip_with DFinsupp.zipWith
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply (f : ∀ i, β₁ i → β₂ i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, f i 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : Π₀ i, β₁ i)
(g₂ : Π₀ i, β₂ i) (i : ι) : zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ i = f i (g₁ i) (g₂ i) :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.zip_with_apply DFinsupp.zipWith_apply
variable [DecidableEq ι]
section Basic
variable [∀ i, Zero (β i)]
theorem finite_support (f : Π₀ i, β i) : Set.Finite { i | f i ≠ 0 } :=
Trunc.induction_on f.support' fun xs ↦
xs.1.finite_toSet.subset fun i H ↦ ((xs.prop i).resolve_right H)
#align dfinsupp.finite_support DFinsupp.finite_support
def mk (s : Finset ι) (x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β (i : ι)) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨fun i => if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0,
Trunc.mk ⟨s.1, fun i => if H : i ∈ s then Or.inl H else Or.inr <| dif_neg H⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.mk DFinsupp.mk
variable {s : Finset ι} {x : ∀ i : (↑s : Set ι), β i} {i : ι}
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = if H : i ∈ s then x ⟨i, H⟩ else 0 :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.mk_apply DFinsupp.mk_apply
theorem mk_of_mem (hi : i ∈ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = x ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
dif_pos hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_mem
theorem mk_of_not_mem (hi : i ∉ s) : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
#align dfinsupp.mk_of_not_mem DFinsupp.mk_of_not_mem
theorem mk_injective (s : Finset ι) : Function.Injective (@mk ι β _ _ s) := by
intro x y H
ext i
have h1 : (mk s x : ∀ i, β i) i = (mk s y : ∀ i, β i) i := by rw [H]
obtain ⟨i, hi : i ∈ s⟩ := i
dsimp only [mk_apply, Subtype.coe_mk] at h1
simpa only [dif_pos hi] using h1
#align dfinsupp.mk_injective DFinsupp.mk_injective
instance unique [∀ i, Subsingleton (β i)] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique DFinsupp.unique
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : Unique (Π₀ i, β i) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.unique
#align dfinsupp.unique_of_is_empty DFinsupp.uniqueOfIsEmpty
@[simps apply]
def equivFunOnFintype [Fintype ι] : (Π₀ i, β i) ≃ ∀ i, β i where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := ⟨f, Trunc.mk ⟨Finset.univ.1, fun _ => Or.inl <| Finset.mem_univ_val _⟩⟩
left_inv _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_apply DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_apply
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe [Fintype ι] (f : Π₀ i, β i) : equivFunOnFintype.symm f = f :=
Equiv.symm_apply_apply _ _
#align dfinsupp.equiv_fun_on_fintype_symm_coe DFinsupp.equivFunOnFintype_symm_coe
def single (i : ι) (b : β i) : Π₀ i, β i :=
⟨Pi.single i b,
Trunc.mk ⟨{i}, fun j => (Decidable.eq_or_ne j i).imp (by simp) fun h => Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _⟩⟩
#align dfinsupp.single DFinsupp.single
theorem single_eq_pi_single {i b} : ⇑(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) = Pi.single i b :=
rfl
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_pi_single DFinsupp.single_eq_pi_single
@[simp]
theorem single_apply {i i' b} :
(single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = if h : i = i' then Eq.recOn h b else 0 := by
rw [single_eq_pi_single, Pi.single, Function.update]
simp [@eq_comm _ i i']
#align dfinsupp.single_apply DFinsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem single_zero (i) : (single i 0 : Π₀ i, β i) = 0 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Pi.single_zero _
#align dfinsupp.single_zero DFinsupp.single_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem single_eq_same {i b} : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i = b := by
simp only [single_apply, dite_eq_ite, ite_true]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_same DFinsupp.single_eq_same
theorem single_eq_of_ne {i i' b} (h : i ≠ i') : (single i b : Π₀ i, β i) i' = 0 := by
simp only [single_apply, dif_neg h]
#align dfinsupp.single_eq_of_ne DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne
theorem single_injective {i} : Function.Injective (single i : β i → Π₀ i, β i) := fun _ _ H =>
Pi.single_injective β i <| DFunLike.coe_injective.eq_iff.mpr H
#align dfinsupp.single_injective DFinsupp.single_injective
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/Basic.lean | 648 | 664 | theorem single_eq_single_iff (i j : ι) (xi : β i) (xj : β j) :
DFinsupp.single i xi = DFinsupp.single j xj ↔ i = j ∧ HEq xi xj ∨ xi = 0 ∧ xj = 0 := by |
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hij : i = j
· subst hij
exact Or.inl ⟨rfl, heq_of_eq (DFinsupp.single_injective h)⟩
· have h_coe : ⇑(DFinsupp.single i xi) = DFinsupp.single j xj := congr_arg (⇑) h
have hci := congr_fun h_coe i
have hcj := congr_fun h_coe j
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_same] at hci hcj
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm hij)] at hci
rw [DFinsupp.single_eq_of_ne hij] at hcj
exact Or.inr ⟨hci, hcj.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, hxi⟩ | ⟨hi, hj⟩)
· rw [eq_of_heq hxi]
· rw [hi, hj, DFinsupp.single_zero, DFinsupp.single_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 224 | 226 | theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by |
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
#align_import topology.category.Top.limits.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
-- Porting note: every ML3 decl has an uppercase letter
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
universe v u w
noncomputable section
namespace TopCat
variable {J : Type v} [SmallCategory J]
section Pullback
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
abbrev pullbackFst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ X :=
⟨Prod.fst ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_fst TopCat.pullbackFst
lemma pullbackFst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackFst f g x = x.1.1 := rfl
abbrev pullbackSnd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ⟶ Y :=
⟨Prod.snd ∘ Subtype.val, by
apply Continuous.comp <;> set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in continuity⟩
#align Top.pullback_snd TopCat.pullbackSnd
lemma pullbackSnd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x) : pullbackSnd f g x = x.1.2 := rfl
def pullbackCone (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : PullbackCone f g :=
PullbackCone.mk (pullbackFst f g) (pullbackSnd f g)
(by
dsimp [pullbackFst, pullbackSnd, Function.comp_def]
ext ⟨x, h⟩
-- Next 2 lines were
-- `rw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk, comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]`
-- `exact h` before leanprover/lean4#2644
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply]
congr!)
#align Top.pullback_cone TopCat.pullbackCone
def pullbackConeIsLimit (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) : IsLimit (pullbackCone f g) :=
PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _
(by
intro S
constructor; swap
· exact
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨S.fst x, S.snd x⟩, by simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom S.condition x⟩
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk <| Continuous.prod_mk ?_ ?_
· exact (PullbackCone.fst S)|>.continuous_toFun
· exact (PullbackCone.snd S)|>.continuous_toFun
}
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· delta pullbackCone
ext a
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk]
· intro m h₁ h₂
-- Porting note: used to be ext x
apply ContinuousMap.ext; intro x
apply Subtype.ext
apply Prod.ext
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x
· simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₂ x)
#align Top.pullback_cone_is_limit TopCat.pullbackConeIsLimit
def pullbackIsoProdSubtype (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
pullback f g ≅ TopCat.of { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } :=
(limit.isLimit _).conePointUniqueUpToIso (pullbackConeIsLimit f g)
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.fst = pullbackFst f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).fst :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_fst_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ≫ pullback.snd = pullbackSnd f g := by
simp [pullbackCone, pullbackIsoProdSubtype]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
(x : { p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 }) :
(pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) ((pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv x) = (x : X × Y).snd :=
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd f g) x
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_inv_snd_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_apply
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackFst f g = pullback.fst := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_fst TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom ≫ pullbackSnd f g = pullback.snd := by
rw [← Iso.eq_inv_comp, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_snd TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd
-- Porting note: why do I need to tell Lean to coerce pullback to a type
theorem pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z}
(x : ConcreteCategory.forget.obj (pullback f g)) :
(pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).hom x =
⟨⟨(pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) x, (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) x⟩, by
simpa using ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition x⟩ := by
apply Subtype.ext; apply Prod.ext
exacts [ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_fst f g) x,
ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_snd f g) x]
#align Top.pullback_iso_prod_subtype_hom_apply TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype_hom_apply
theorem pullback_topology {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
(pullback f g).str =
induced (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) X.str ⊓
induced (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) Y.str := by
let homeo := homeoOfIso (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g)
refine homeo.inducing.induced.trans ?_
change induced homeo (induced _ ( (induced Prod.fst X.str) ⊓ (induced Prod.snd Y.str))) = _
simp only [induced_compose, induced_inf]
congr
#align Top.pullback_topology TopCat.pullback_topology
theorem range_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Set.range (prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) =
{ x | (Limits.prod.fst ≫ f) x = (Limits.prod.snd ≫ g) x } := by
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
change (_ ≫ _ ≫ f) _ = (_ ≫ _ ≫ g) _ -- new `change` after #13170
simp [pullback.condition]
· rintro (h : f (_, _).1 = g (_, _).2)
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨_, _⟩, h⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _ -- new `change` after #13170
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, limit.lift_π] <;> -- now `erw` after #13170
-- This used to be `simp` before leanprover/lean4#2644
aesop_cat
#align Top.range_pullback_to_prod TopCat.range_pullback_to_prod
noncomputable
def pullbackHomeoPreimage
{X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
(f : X → Z) (hf : Continuous f) (g : Y → Z) (hg : Embedding g) :
{ p : X × Y // f p.1 = g p.2 } ≃ₜ f ⁻¹' Set.range g where
toFun := fun x ↦ ⟨x.1.1, _, x.2.symm⟩
invFun := fun x ↦ ⟨⟨x.1, Exists.choose x.2⟩, (Exists.choose_spec x.2).symm⟩
left_inv := by
intro x
ext <;> dsimp
apply hg.inj
convert x.prop
exact Exists.choose_spec (p := fun y ↦ g y = f (↑x : X × Y).1) _
right_inv := fun x ↦ rfl
continuous_toFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
exact continuous_fst.comp continuous_subtype_val
continuous_invFun := by
apply Continuous.subtype_mk
refine continuous_prod_mk.mpr ⟨continuous_subtype_val, hg.toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr ?_⟩
convert hf.comp continuous_subtype_val
ext x
exact Exists.choose_spec x.2
theorem inducing_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Inducing <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨by simp [topologicalSpace_coe, prod_topology, pullback_topology, induced_compose, ← coe_comp]⟩
#align Top.inducing_pullback_to_prod TopCat.inducing_pullback_to_prod
theorem embedding_pullback_to_prod {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
Embedding <| ⇑(prod.lift pullback.fst pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ X ⨯ Y) :=
⟨inducing_pullback_to_prod f g, (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp inferInstance⟩
#align Top.embedding_pullback_to_prod TopCat.embedding_pullback_to_prod
theorem range_pullback_map {W X Y Z S T : TopCat} (f₁ : W ⟶ S) (f₂ : X ⟶ S) (g₁ : Y ⟶ T)
(g₂ : Z ⟶ T) (i₁ : W ⟶ Y) (i₂ : X ⟶ Z) (i₃ : S ⟶ T) [H₃ : Mono i₃] (eq₁ : f₁ ≫ i₃ = i₁ ≫ g₁)
(eq₂ : f₂ ≫ i₃ = i₂ ≫ g₂) :
Set.range (pullback.map f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ i₁ i₂ i₃ eq₁ eq₂) =
(pullback.fst : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₁ ∩
(pullback.snd : pullback g₁ g₂ ⟶ _) ⁻¹' Set.range i₂ := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_range]
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app, comp_apply]
exact ⟨exists_apply_eq_apply _ _, exists_apply_eq_apply _ _⟩
rintro ⟨⟨x₁, hx₁⟩, ⟨x₂, hx₂⟩⟩
have : f₁ x₁ = f₂ x₂ := by
apply (TopCat.mono_iff_injective _).mp H₃
erw [← comp_apply, eq₁, ← comp_apply, eq₂, -- now `erw` after #13170
comp_apply, comp_apply, hx₁, hx₂, ← comp_apply, pullback.condition]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
use (pullbackIsoProdSubtype f₁ f₂).inv ⟨⟨x₁, x₂⟩, this⟩
change (forget TopCat).map _ _ = _
apply Concrete.limit_ext
rintro (_ | _ | _) <;>
erw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply] -- now `erw` after #13170
simp only [Category.assoc, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_π_app_one]
· simp only [cospan_one, pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [pullbackFst_apply, hx₁]
rw [← limit.w _ WalkingCospan.Hom.inl, cospan_map_inl, comp_apply (g := g₁)]
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_left, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₁] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
· simp only [cospan_right, limit.lift_π, PullbackCone.mk_pt, PullbackCone.mk_π_app,
pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_snd_assoc, comp_apply]
erw [hx₂] -- now `erw` after #13170
rfl -- `rfl` was not needed before #13170
#align Top.range_pullback_map TopCat.range_pullback_map
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Limits/Pullbacks.lean | 251 | 260 | theorem pullback_fst_range {X Y S : TopCat} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) :
Set.range (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ _) = { x : X | ∃ y : Y, f x = g y } := by |
ext x
constructor
· rintro ⟨(y : (forget TopCat).obj _), rfl⟩
use (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _) y
exact ConcreteCategory.congr_hom pullback.condition y
· rintro ⟨y, eq⟩
use (TopCat.pullbackIsoProdSubtype f g).inv ⟨⟨x, y⟩, eq⟩
rw [pullbackIsoProdSubtype_inv_fst_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gaussian.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.PoissonSummation
open Real Set MeasureTheory Filter Asymptotics intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology FourierTransform RealInnerProductSpace
open Complex hiding exp continuous_exp abs_of_nonneg sq_abs
noncomputable section
section GaussianPoisson
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
lemma rexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop {a : ℝ} (ha : a < 0) (b s : ℝ) :
(fun x ↦ rexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (· ^ s) := by
suffices (fun x ↦ rexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (fun x ↦ rexp (-x)) by
refine this.trans ?_
simpa only [neg_one_mul] using isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_rpow_atTop zero_lt_one s
rw [isLittleO_exp_comp_exp_comp]
have : (fun x ↦ -x - (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) = fun x ↦ x * (-a * x - (b + 1)) := by
ext1 x; ring_nf
rw [this]
exact tendsto_id.atTop_mul_atTop <|
Filter.tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ <| tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop (neg_pos.mpr ha)
lemma cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (b : ℂ) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ ↦ cexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[atTop] (· ^ s) := by
apply Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
convert rexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha b.re s with x
simp_rw [Complex.norm_eq_abs, Complex.abs_exp, add_re, ← ofReal_pow, mul_comm (_ : ℂ) ↑(_ : ℝ),
re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm _ (re _)]
lemma cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_abs_rpow_cocompact {a : ℂ} (ha : a.re < 0) (b : ℂ) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ ↦ cexp (a * x ^ 2 + b * x)) =o[cocompact ℝ] (|·| ^ s) := by
rw [cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop, isLittleO_sup]
constructor
· refine ((cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha (-b) s).comp_tendsto
Filter.tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop).congr' (eventually_of_forall fun x ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp only [neg_mul, Function.comp_apply, ofReal_neg, neg_sq, mul_neg, neg_neg]
· refine (eventually_lt_atBot 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp only [Function.comp_apply, abs_of_neg hx]
· refine (cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_rpow_atTop ha b s).congr' EventuallyEq.rfl ?_
refine (eventually_gt_atTop 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun x hx ↦ ?_)
simp_rw [abs_of_pos hx]
theorem tendsto_rpow_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (s : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ s * rexp (-a * x ^ 2)) (cocompact ℝ) (𝓝 0) := by
conv in rexp _ => rw [← sq_abs]
erw [cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop, ← comap_abs_atTop,
@tendsto_comap'_iff _ _ _ (fun y => y ^ s * rexp (-a * y ^ 2)) _ _ _
(mem_atTop_sets.mpr ⟨0, fun b hb => ⟨b, abs_of_nonneg hb⟩⟩)]
exact
(rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_isLittleO_exp_neg ha s).tendsto_zero_of_tendsto
(tendsto_exp_atBot.comp <| tendsto_id.const_mul_atTop_of_neg (neg_lt_zero.mpr one_half_pos))
#align tendsto_rpow_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact tendsto_rpow_abs_mul_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact
theorem isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact {a : ℂ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => Complex.exp (-a * x ^ 2)) =o[cocompact ℝ] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ s := by
convert cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_abs_rpow_cocompact (?_ : (-a).re < 0) 0 s using 1
· simp_rw [zero_mul, add_zero]
· rwa [neg_re, neg_lt_zero]
#align is_o_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact isLittleO_exp_neg_mul_sq_cocompact
theorem Complex.tsum_exp_neg_quadratic {a : ℂ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (b : ℂ) :
(∑' n : ℤ, cexp (-π * a * n ^ 2 + 2 * π * b * n)) =
1 / a ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * ∑' n : ℤ, cexp (-π / a * (n + I * b) ^ 2) := by
let f : ℝ → ℂ := fun x ↦ cexp (-π * a * x ^ 2 + 2 * π * b * x)
have hCf : Continuous f := by
refine Complex.continuous_exp.comp (Continuous.add ?_ ?_)
· exact continuous_const.mul (Complex.continuous_ofReal.pow 2)
· exact continuous_const.mul Complex.continuous_ofReal
have hFf : 𝓕 f = fun x : ℝ ↦ 1 / a ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * cexp (-π / a * (x + I * b) ^ 2) :=
fourierIntegral_gaussian_pi' ha b
have h1 : 0 < (↑π * a).re := by
rw [re_ofReal_mul]
exact mul_pos pi_pos ha
have h2 : 0 < (↑π / a).re := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, re_ofReal_mul, inv_re]
refine mul_pos pi_pos (div_pos ha <| normSq_pos.mpr ?_)
contrapose! ha
rw [ha, zero_re]
have f_bd : f =O[cocompact ℝ] (fun x => |x| ^ (-2 : ℝ)) := by
convert (cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_abs_rpow_cocompact ?_ _ (-2)).isBigO
rwa [neg_mul, neg_re, neg_lt_zero]
have Ff_bd : (𝓕 f) =O[cocompact ℝ] (fun x => |x| ^ (-2 : ℝ)) := by
rw [hFf]
have : ∀ (x : ℝ), -↑π / a * (↑x + I * b) ^ 2 =
-↑π / a * x ^ 2 + (-2 * π * I * b) / a * x + π * b ^ 2 / a := by
intro x; ring_nf; rw [I_sq]; ring
simp_rw [this]
conv => enter [2, x]; rw [Complex.exp_add, ← mul_assoc _ _ (Complex.exp _), mul_comm]
refine ((cexp_neg_quadratic_isLittleO_abs_rpow_cocompact
(?_) (-2 * ↑π * I * b / a) (-2)).isBigO.const_mul_left _).const_mul_left _
rwa [neg_div, neg_re, neg_lt_zero]
convert Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral_of_rpow_decay hCf one_lt_two f_bd Ff_bd 0 using 1
· simp only [f, zero_add, ofReal_intCast]
· rw [← tsum_mul_left]
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, fourier_eval_zero, mul_one, hFf, ofReal_intCast]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gaussian/PoissonSummation.lean | 124 | 127 | theorem Complex.tsum_exp_neg_mul_int_sq {a : ℂ} (ha : 0 < a.re) :
(∑' n : ℤ, cexp (-π * a * (n : ℂ) ^ 2)) =
1 / a ^ (1 / 2 : ℂ) * ∑' n : ℤ, cexp (-π / a * (n : ℂ) ^ 2) := by |
simpa only [mul_zero, zero_mul, add_zero] using Complex.tsum_exp_neg_quadratic ha 0
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.GroupCat.Preadditive
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Elementwise
#align_import algebra.category.Group.colimits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
-- Porting note: `AddCommGroup` in all the names
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe w u v
open CategoryTheory Limits
-- [ROBOT VOICE]:
-- You should pretend for now that this file was automatically generated.
-- It follows the same template as colimits in Mon.
namespace AddCommGroupCat
variable {J : Type u} [Category.{v} J] (F : J ⥤ AddCommGroupCat.{max u v w})
namespace Colimits
inductive Prequotient
-- There's always `of`
| of : ∀ (j : J) (_ : F.obj j), Prequotient
-- Then one generator for each operation
| zero : Prequotient
| neg : Prequotient → Prequotient
| add : Prequotient → Prequotient → Prequotient
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.prequotient AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.Prequotient
instance : Inhabited (Prequotient.{w} F) :=
⟨Prequotient.zero⟩
open Prequotient
inductive Relation : Prequotient.{w} F → Prequotient.{w} F → Prop
-- Make it an equivalence relation:
| refl : ∀ x, Relation x x
| symm : ∀ (x y) (_ : Relation x y), Relation y x
| trans : ∀ (x y z) (_ : Relation x y) (_ : Relation y z), Relation x z
-- There's always a `map` relation
| map : ∀ (j j' : J) (f : j ⟶ j') (x : F.obj j), Relation (Prequotient.of j' (F.map f x))
(Prequotient.of j x)
-- Then one relation per operation, describing the interaction with `of`
| zero : ∀ j, Relation (Prequotient.of j 0) zero
| neg : ∀ (j) (x : F.obj j), Relation (Prequotient.of j (-x)) (neg (Prequotient.of j x))
| add : ∀ (j) (x y : F.obj j), Relation (Prequotient.of j (x + y)) (add (Prequotient.of j x)
(Prequotient.of j y))
-- Then one relation per argument of each operation
| neg_1 : ∀ (x x') (_ : Relation x x'), Relation (neg x) (neg x')
| add_1 : ∀ (x x' y) (_ : Relation x x'), Relation (add x y) (add x' y)
| add_2 : ∀ (x y y') (_ : Relation y y'), Relation (add x y) (add x y')
-- And one relation per axiom
| zero_add : ∀ x, Relation (add zero x) x
| add_zero : ∀ x, Relation (add x zero) x
| add_left_neg : ∀ x, Relation (add (neg x) x) zero
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Relation (add x y) (add y x)
| add_assoc : ∀ x y z, Relation (add (add x y) z) (add x (add y z))
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.relation AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.Relation
def colimitSetoid : Setoid (Prequotient.{w} F) where
r := Relation F
iseqv := ⟨Relation.refl, fun r => Relation.symm _ _ r, fun r => Relation.trans _ _ _ r⟩
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.colimit_setoid AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.colimitSetoid
attribute [instance] colimitSetoid
def ColimitType : Type max u v w :=
Quotient (colimitSetoid.{w} F)
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.colimit_type AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.ColimitType
instance : Zero (ColimitType.{w} F) where
zero := Quotient.mk _ zero
instance : Neg (ColimitType.{w} F) where
neg := Quotient.map neg Relation.neg_1
instance : Add (ColimitType.{w} F) where
add := Quotient.map₂ add <| fun _x x' rx y _y' ry =>
Setoid.trans (Relation.add_1 _ _ y rx) (Relation.add_2 x' _ _ ry)
instance : AddCommGroup (ColimitType.{w} F) where
zero_add := Quotient.ind <| fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Relation.zero_add _
add_zero := Quotient.ind <| fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Relation.add_zero _
add_left_neg := Quotient.ind <| fun _ => Quotient.sound <| Relation.add_left_neg _
add_comm := Quotient.ind₂ <| fun _ _ => Quotient.sound <| Relation.add_comm _ _
add_assoc := Quotient.ind <| fun _ => Quotient.ind₂ <| fun _ _ =>
Quotient.sound <| Relation.add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
zsmul := zsmulRec
instance ColimitTypeInhabited : Inhabited (ColimitType.{w} F) := ⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_zero : Quot.mk Setoid.r zero = (0 : ColimitType.{w} F) :=
rfl
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.quot_zero AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.quot_zero
@[simp]
theorem quot_neg (x) :
-- Porting note: force Lean to treat `ColimitType F` no as `Quot _`
(by exact Quot.mk Setoid.r (neg x) : ColimitType.{w} F) =
-(by exact Quot.mk Setoid.r x) :=
rfl
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.quot_neg AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.quot_neg
@[simp]
theorem quot_add (x y) :
(by exact Quot.mk Setoid.r (add x y) : ColimitType.{w} F) =
-- Porting note: force Lean to treat `ColimitType F` no as `Quot _`
(by exact Quot.mk Setoid.r x) + (by exact Quot.mk Setoid.r y) :=
rfl
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.quot_add AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.quot_add
def colimit : AddCommGroupCat :=
AddCommGroupCat.of (ColimitType.{w} F)
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.colimit AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.colimit
def coconeFun (j : J) (x : F.obj j) : ColimitType.{w} F :=
Quot.mk _ (Prequotient.of j x)
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.cocone_fun AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.coconeFun
def coconeMorphism (j : J) : F.obj j ⟶ colimit.{w} F where
toFun := coconeFun F j
map_zero' := by apply Quot.sound; apply Relation.zero
map_add' := by intros; apply Quot.sound; apply Relation.add
#align AddCommGroup.colimits.cocone_morphism AddCommGroupCat.Colimits.coconeMorphism
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Category/GroupCat/Colimits.lean | 173 | 177 | theorem cocone_naturality {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
F.map f ≫ coconeMorphism.{w} F j' = coconeMorphism F j := by |
ext
apply Quot.sound
apply Relation.map
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter
open Set
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α}
namespace Filter
protected def Subsingleton (l : Filter α) : Prop := ∃ s ∈ l, Set.Subsingleton s
theorem HasBasis.subsingleton_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : l.HasBasis p s) :
l.Subsingleton ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ (s i).Subsingleton :=
h.exists_iff fun _ _ hsub h ↦ h.anti hsub
theorem Subsingleton.anti {l'} (hl : l.Subsingleton) (hl' : l' ≤ l) : l'.Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; ⟨s, hl' hsl, hs⟩
@[nontriviality]
theorem Subsingleton.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : l.Subsingleton :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, subsingleton_univ⟩
theorem Subsingleton.map (hl : l.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (map f l).Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; ⟨f '' s, image_mem_map hsl, hs.image f⟩
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hl : l.Subsingleton) {l' : Filter β} (hl' : l'.Subsingleton) :
(l ×ˢ l').Subsingleton :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := hl; let ⟨t, htl', ht⟩ := hl'; ⟨s ×ˢ t, prod_mem_prod hsl htl', hs.prod ht⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_pure {a : α} : Filter.Subsingleton (pure a) :=
⟨{a}, rfl, subsingleton_singleton⟩
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_bot : Filter.Subsingleton (⊥ : Filter α) :=
⟨∅, trivial, subsingleton_empty⟩
theorem Subsingleton.exists_eq_pure [l.NeBot] (hl : l.Subsingleton) : ∃ a, l = pure a := by
rcases hl with ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩
rcases exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨nonempty_of_mem hsl, hs⟩ with ⟨a, rfl⟩
refine ⟨a, (NeBot.le_pure_iff ‹_›).1 ?_⟩
rwa [le_pure_iff]
theorem subsingleton_iff_bot_or_pure : l.Subsingleton ↔ l = ⊥ ∨ ∃ a, l = pure a := by
refine ⟨fun hl ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (eq_or_neBot l).imp_right (@Subsingleton.exists_eq_pure _ _ · hl)
· rintro (rfl | ⟨a, rfl⟩) <;> simp
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Subsingleton.lean | 65 | 68 | theorem subsingleton_iff_exists_le_pure [Nonempty α] : l.Subsingleton ↔ ∃ a, l ≤ pure a := by |
rcases eq_or_neBot l with rfl | hbot
· simp
· simp [subsingleton_iff_bot_or_pure, ← hbot.le_pure_iff, hbot.ne]
|
import Mathlib.Order.RelClasses
#align_import data.sigma.lex from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41cf0cc2f528dd40a8f2db167ea4fb37b8fde7f3"
namespace PSigma
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : ι → Sort*} {r r₁ r₂ : ι → ι → Prop} {s s₁ s₂ : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop}
theorem lex_iff {a b : Σ' i, α i} :
Lex r s a b ↔ r a.1 b.1 ∨ ∃ h : a.1 = b.1, s b.1 (h.rec a.2) b.2 := by
constructor
· rintro (⟨a, b, hij⟩ | ⟨i, hab⟩)
· exact Or.inl hij
· exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hab⟩
· obtain ⟨i, a⟩ := a
obtain ⟨j, b⟩ := b
dsimp only
rintro (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact Lex.left _ _ h
· exact Lex.right _ h
#align psigma.lex_iff PSigma.lex_iff
instance Lex.decidable (r : ι → ι → Prop) (s : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop) [DecidableEq ι]
[DecidableRel r] [∀ i, DecidableRel (s i)] : DecidableRel (Lex r s) := fun _ _ =>
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff lex_iff.symm
#align psigma.lex.decidable PSigma.Lex.decidable
| Mathlib/Data/Sigma/Lex.lean | 170 | 175 | theorem Lex.mono {r₁ r₂ : ι → ι → Prop} {s₁ s₂ : ∀ i, α i → α i → Prop}
(hr : ∀ a b, r₁ a b → r₂ a b) (hs : ∀ i a b, s₁ i a b → s₂ i a b) {a b : Σ' i, α i}
(h : Lex r₁ s₁ a b) : Lex r₂ s₂ a b := by |
obtain ⟨a, b, hij⟩ | ⟨i, hab⟩ := h
· exact Lex.left _ _ (hr _ _ hij)
· exact Lex.right _ (hs _ _ _ hab)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import data.part from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"80c43012d26f63026d362c3aba28f3c3bafb07e6"
open Function
structure Part.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u where
Dom : Prop
get : Dom → α
#align part Part
namespace Part
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
def toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Option α :=
if h : Dom o then some (o.get h) else none
#align part.to_option Part.toOption
@[simp] lemma toOption_isSome (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isSome ↔ o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_some Part.toOption_isSome
@[simp] lemma toOption_isNone (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : o.toOption.isNone ↔ ¬o.Dom := by
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h, toOption]
#align part.to_option_is_none Part.toOption_isNone
theorem ext' : ∀ {o p : Part α}, (o.Dom ↔ p.Dom) → (∀ h₁ h₂, o.get h₁ = p.get h₂) → o = p
| ⟨od, o⟩, ⟨pd, p⟩, H1, H2 => by
have t : od = pd := propext H1
cases t; rw [show o = p from funext fun p => H2 p p]
#align part.ext' Part.ext'
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ o : Part α, (⟨o.Dom, fun h => o.get h⟩ : Part α) = o
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align part.eta Part.eta
protected def Mem (a : α) (o : Part α) : Prop :=
∃ h, o.get h = a
#align part.mem Part.Mem
instance : Membership α (Part α) :=
⟨Part.Mem⟩
theorem mem_eq (a : α) (o : Part α) : (a ∈ o) = ∃ h, o.get h = a :=
rfl
#align part.mem_eq Part.mem_eq
theorem dom_iff_mem : ∀ {o : Part α}, o.Dom ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ o
| ⟨_, f⟩ => ⟨fun h => ⟨f h, h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h, rfl⟩ => h⟩
#align part.dom_iff_mem Part.dom_iff_mem
theorem get_mem {o : Part α} (h) : get o h ∈ o :=
⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.get_mem Part.get_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk_iff {p : Prop} {o : p → α} {a : α} : a ∈ Part.mk p o ↔ ∃ h, o h = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align part.mem_mk_iff Part.mem_mk_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {o p : Part α} (H : ∀ a, a ∈ o ↔ a ∈ p) : o = p :=
(ext' ⟨fun h => ((H _).1 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst, fun h => ((H _).2 ⟨h, rfl⟩).fst⟩) fun _ _ =>
((H _).2 ⟨_, rfl⟩).snd
#align part.ext Part.ext
def none : Part α :=
⟨False, False.rec⟩
#align part.none Part.none
instance : Inhabited (Part α) :=
⟨none⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_none (a : α) : a ∉ @none α := fun h => h.fst
#align part.not_mem_none Part.not_mem_none
def some (a : α) : Part α :=
⟨True, fun _ => a⟩
#align part.some Part.some
@[simp]
theorem some_dom (a : α) : (some a).Dom :=
trivial
#align part.some_dom Part.some_dom
theorem mem_unique : ∀ {a b : α} {o : Part α}, a ∈ o → b ∈ o → a = b
| _, _, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => rfl
#align part.mem_unique Part.mem_unique
theorem Mem.left_unique : Relator.LeftUnique ((· ∈ ·) : α → Part α → Prop) := fun _ _ _ =>
mem_unique
#align part.mem.left_unique Part.Mem.left_unique
theorem get_eq_of_mem {o : Part α} {a} (h : a ∈ o) (h') : get o h' = a :=
mem_unique ⟨_, rfl⟩ h
#align part.get_eq_of_mem Part.get_eq_of_mem
protected theorem subsingleton (o : Part α) : Set.Subsingleton { a | a ∈ o } := fun _ ha _ hb =>
mem_unique ha hb
#align part.subsingleton Part.subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem get_some {a : α} (ha : (some a).Dom) : get (some a) ha = a :=
rfl
#align part.get_some Part.get_some
theorem mem_some (a : α) : a ∈ some a :=
⟨trivial, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_some Part.mem_some
@[simp]
theorem mem_some_iff {a b} : b ∈ (some a : Part α) ↔ b = a :=
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm, fun e => ⟨trivial, e.symm⟩⟩
#align part.mem_some_iff Part.mem_some_iff
theorem eq_some_iff {a : α} {o : Part α} : o = some a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_some _, fun ⟨h, e⟩ => e ▸ ext' (iff_true_intro h) fun _ _ => rfl⟩
#align part.eq_some_iff Part.eq_some_iff
theorem eq_none_iff {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ∀ a, a ∉ o :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ not_mem_none, fun h => ext (by simpa)⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff Part.eq_none_iff
theorem eq_none_iff' {o : Part α} : o = none ↔ ¬o.Dom :=
⟨fun e => e.symm ▸ id, fun h => eq_none_iff.2 fun _ h' => h h'.fst⟩
#align part.eq_none_iff' Part.eq_none_iff'
@[simp]
theorem not_none_dom : ¬(none : Part α).Dom :=
id
#align part.not_none_dom Part.not_none_dom
@[simp]
theorem some_ne_none (x : α) : some x ≠ none := by
intro h
exact true_ne_false (congr_arg Dom h)
#align part.some_ne_none Part.some_ne_none
@[simp]
theorem none_ne_some (x : α) : none ≠ some x :=
(some_ne_none x).symm
#align part.none_ne_some Part.none_ne_some
theorem ne_none_iff {o : Part α} : o ≠ none ↔ ∃ x, o = some x := by
constructor
· rw [Ne, eq_none_iff', not_not]
exact fun h => ⟨o.get h, eq_some_iff.2 (get_mem h)⟩
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply some_ne_none
#align part.ne_none_iff Part.ne_none_iff
theorem eq_none_or_eq_some (o : Part α) : o = none ∨ ∃ x, o = some x :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 ne_none_iff.1
#align part.eq_none_or_eq_some Part.eq_none_or_eq_some
theorem some_injective : Injective (@Part.some α) := fun _ _ h =>
congr_fun (eq_of_heq (Part.mk.inj h).2) trivial
#align part.some_injective Part.some_injective
@[simp]
theorem some_inj {a b : α} : Part.some a = some b ↔ a = b :=
some_injective.eq_iff
#align part.some_inj Part.some_inj
@[simp]
theorem some_get {a : Part α} (ha : a.Dom) : Part.some (Part.get a ha) = a :=
Eq.symm (eq_some_iff.2 ⟨ha, rfl⟩)
#align part.some_get Part.some_get
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : Part α} {ha : a.Dom} {b : α} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h.symm], fun h => by simp [h]⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_eq_some Part.get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_get_of_eq (a : Part α) (ha : a.Dom) {b : Part α} (h : a = b) :
a.get ha = b.get (h ▸ ha) := by
congr
#align part.get_eq_get_of_eq Part.get_eq_get_of_eq
theorem get_eq_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : o.get h = a ↔ a ∈ o :=
⟨fun H => ⟨h, H⟩, fun ⟨_, H⟩ => H⟩
#align part.get_eq_iff_mem Part.get_eq_iff_mem
theorem eq_get_iff_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : o.Dom) : a = o.get h ↔ a ∈ o :=
eq_comm.trans (get_eq_iff_mem h)
#align part.eq_get_iff_mem Part.eq_get_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem none_toOption [Decidable (@none α).Dom] : (none : Part α).toOption = Option.none :=
dif_neg id
#align part.none_to_option Part.none_toOption
@[simp]
theorem some_toOption (a : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toOption = Option.some a :=
dif_pos trivial
#align part.some_to_option Part.some_toOption
instance noneDecidable : Decidable (@none α).Dom :=
instDecidableFalse
#align part.none_decidable Part.noneDecidable
instance someDecidable (a : α) : Decidable (some a).Dom :=
instDecidableTrue
#align part.some_decidable Part.someDecidable
def getOrElse (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :=
if ha : a.Dom then a.get ha else d
#align part.get_or_else Part.getOrElse
theorem getOrElse_of_dom (a : Part α) (h : a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = a.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.get_or_else_of_dom Part.getOrElse_of_dom
theorem getOrElse_of_not_dom (a : Part α) (h : ¬a.Dom) [Decidable a.Dom] (d : α) :
getOrElse a d = d :=
dif_neg h
#align part.get_or_else_of_not_dom Part.getOrElse_of_not_dom
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_none (d : α) [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : getOrElse none d = d :=
none.getOrElse_of_not_dom not_none_dom d
#align part.get_or_else_none Part.getOrElse_none
@[simp]
theorem getOrElse_some (a : α) (d : α) [Decidable (some a).Dom] : getOrElse (some a) d = a :=
(some a).getOrElse_of_dom (some_dom a) d
#align part.get_or_else_some Part.getOrElse_some
-- Porting note: removed `simp`
theorem mem_toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} : a ∈ toOption o ↔ a ∈ o := by
unfold toOption
by_cases h : o.Dom <;> simp [h]
· exact ⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => h⟩
· exact mt Exists.fst h
#align part.mem_to_option Part.mem_toOption
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem, like `mem_toOption` but with LHS in `simp` normal form
@[simp]
theorem toOption_eq_some_iff {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {a : α} :
toOption o = Option.some a ↔ a ∈ o := by
rw [← Option.mem_def, mem_toOption]
protected theorem Dom.toOption {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] (h : o.Dom) : o.toOption = o.get h :=
dif_pos h
#align part.dom.to_option Part.Dom.toOption
theorem toOption_eq_none_iff {a : Part α} [Decidable a.Dom] : a.toOption = Option.none ↔ ¬a.Dom :=
Ne.dite_eq_right_iff fun _ => Option.some_ne_none _
#align part.to_option_eq_none_iff Part.toOption_eq_none_iff
theorem elim_toOption {α β : Type*} (a : Part α) [Decidable a.Dom] (b : β) (f : α → β) :
a.toOption.elim b f = if h : a.Dom then f (a.get h) else b := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [h.toOption]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
rfl
#align part.elim_to_option Part.elim_toOption
@[coe]
def ofOption : Option α → Part α
| Option.none => none
| Option.some a => some a
#align part.of_option Part.ofOption
@[simp]
theorem mem_ofOption {a : α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, a ∈ ofOption o ↔ a ∈ o
| Option.none => ⟨fun h => h.fst.elim, fun h => Option.noConfusion h⟩
| Option.some _ => ⟨fun h => congr_arg Option.some h.snd, fun h => ⟨trivial, Option.some.inj h⟩⟩
#align part.mem_of_option Part.mem_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem ofOption_dom {α} : ∀ o : Option α, (ofOption o).Dom ↔ o.isSome
| Option.none => by simp [ofOption, none]
| Option.some a => by simp [ofOption]
#align part.of_option_dom Part.ofOption_dom
theorem ofOption_eq_get {α} (o : Option α) : ofOption o = ⟨_, @Option.get _ o⟩ :=
Part.ext' (ofOption_dom o) fun h₁ h₂ => by
cases o
· simp at h₂
· rfl
#align part.of_option_eq_get Part.ofOption_eq_get
instance : Coe (Option α) (Part α) :=
⟨ofOption⟩
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ (o : Part α) ↔ a ∈ o :=
mem_ofOption
#align part.mem_coe Part.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_none : (@Option.none α : Part α) = none :=
rfl
#align part.coe_none Part.coe_none
@[simp]
theorem coe_some (a : α) : (Option.some a : Part α) = some a :=
rfl
#align part.coe_some Part.coe_some
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {P : Part α → Prop} (a : Part α) (hnone : P none)
(hsome : ∀ a : α, P (some a)) : P a :=
(Classical.em a.Dom).elim (fun h => Part.some_get h ▸ hsome _) fun h =>
(eq_none_iff'.2 h).symm ▸ hnone
#align part.induction_on Part.induction_on
instance ofOptionDecidable : ∀ o : Option α, Decidable (ofOption o).Dom
| Option.none => Part.noneDecidable
| Option.some a => Part.someDecidable a
#align part.of_option_decidable Part.ofOptionDecidable
@[simp]
theorem to_ofOption (o : Option α) : toOption (ofOption o) = o := by cases o <;> rfl
#align part.to_of_option Part.to_ofOption
@[simp]
theorem of_toOption (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : ofOption (toOption o) = o :=
ext fun _ => mem_ofOption.trans mem_toOption
#align part.of_to_option Part.of_toOption
noncomputable def equivOption : Part α ≃ Option α :=
haveI := Classical.dec
⟨fun o => toOption o, ofOption, fun o => of_toOption o, fun o =>
Eq.trans (by dsimp; congr) (to_ofOption o)⟩
#align part.equiv_option Part.equivOption
instance : PartialOrder (Part
α) where
le x y := ∀ i, i ∈ x → i ∈ y
le_refl x y := id
le_trans x y z f g i := g _ ∘ f _
le_antisymm x y f g := Part.ext fun z => ⟨f _, g _⟩
instance : OrderBot (Part α) where
bot := none
bot_le := by rintro x _ ⟨⟨_⟩, _⟩
theorem le_total_of_le_of_le {x y : Part α} (z : Part α) (hx : x ≤ z) (hy : y ≤ z) :
x ≤ y ∨ y ≤ x := by
rcases Part.eq_none_or_eq_some x with (h | ⟨b, h₀⟩)
· rw [h]
left
apply OrderBot.bot_le _
right; intro b' h₁
rw [Part.eq_some_iff] at h₀
have hx := hx _ h₀; have hy := hy _ h₁
have hx := Part.mem_unique hx hy; subst hx
exact h₀
#align part.le_total_of_le_of_le Part.le_total_of_le_of_le
def assert (p : Prop) (f : p → Part α) : Part α :=
⟨∃ h : p, (f h).Dom, fun ha => (f ha.fst).get ha.snd⟩
#align part.assert Part.assert
protected def bind (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) : Part β :=
assert (Dom f) fun b => g (f.get b)
#align part.bind Part.bind
@[simps]
def map (f : α → β) (o : Part α) : Part β :=
⟨o.Dom, f ∘ o.get⟩
#align part.map Part.map
#align part.map_dom Part.map_Dom
#align part.map_get Part.map_get
theorem mem_map (f : α → β) {o : Part α} : ∀ {a}, a ∈ o → f a ∈ map f o
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_map Part.mem_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map_iff (f : α → β) {o : Part α} {b} : b ∈ map f o ↔ ∃ a ∈ o, f a = b :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, rfl⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => h₂ ▸ mem_map f h₁⟩
#align part.mem_map_iff Part.mem_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem map_none (f : α → β) : map f none = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.map_none Part.map_none
@[simp]
theorem map_some (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (some a) = some (f a) :=
eq_some_iff.2 <| mem_map f <| mem_some _
#align part.map_some Part.map_some
theorem mem_assert {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} : ∀ {a} (h : p), a ∈ f h → a ∈ assert p f
| _, x, ⟨h, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨x, h⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_assert Part.mem_assert
@[simp]
theorem mem_assert_iff {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} {a} : a ∈ assert p f ↔ ∃ h : p, a ∈ f h :=
⟨fun ha => match a, ha with
| _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h⟩ => mem_assert _ h⟩
#align part.mem_assert_iff Part.mem_assert_iff
theorem assert_pos {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : p) : assert p f = f h := by
dsimp [assert]
cases h' : f h
simp only [h', mk.injEq, h, exists_prop_of_true, true_and]
apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, h', exists_prop_of_true]
· aesop
#align part.assert_pos Part.assert_pos
theorem assert_neg {p : Prop} {f : p → Part α} (h : ¬p) : assert p f = none := by
dsimp [assert, none]; congr
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
· apply Function.hfunext
· simp only [h, not_false_iff, exists_prop_of_false]
simp at *
#align part.assert_neg Part.assert_neg
theorem mem_bind {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} : ∀ {a b}, a ∈ f → b ∈ g a → b ∈ f.bind g
| _, _, ⟨h, rfl⟩, ⟨h₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨⟨h, h₂⟩, rfl⟩
#align part.mem_bind Part.mem_bind
@[simp]
theorem mem_bind_iff {f : Part α} {g : α → Part β} {b} : b ∈ f.bind g ↔ ∃ a ∈ f, b ∈ g a :=
⟨fun hb => match b, hb with
| _, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ => mem_bind h₁ h₂⟩
#align part.mem_bind_iff Part.mem_bind_iff
protected theorem Dom.bind {o : Part α} (h : o.Dom) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f (o.get h) := by
ext b
simp only [Part.mem_bind_iff, exists_prop]
refine ⟨?_, fun hb => ⟨o.get h, Part.get_mem _, hb⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha, hb⟩
rwa [Part.get_eq_of_mem ha]
#align part.dom.bind Part.Dom.bind
theorem Dom.of_bind {f : α → Part β} {a : Part α} (h : (a.bind f).Dom) : a.Dom :=
h.1
#align part.dom.of_bind Part.Dom.of_bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_none (f : α → Part β) : none.bind f = none :=
eq_none_iff.2 fun a => by simp
#align part.bind_none Part.bind_none
@[simp]
theorem bind_some (a : α) (f : α → Part β) : (some a).bind f = f a :=
ext <| by simp
#align part.bind_some Part.bind_some
theorem bind_of_mem {o : Part α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ o) (f : α → Part β) : o.bind f = f a := by
rw [eq_some_iff.2 h, bind_some]
#align part.bind_of_mem Part.bind_of_mem
theorem bind_some_eq_map (f : α → β) (x : Part α) : x.bind (some ∘ f) = map f x :=
ext <| by simp [eq_comm]
#align part.bind_some_eq_map Part.bind_some_eq_map
theorem bind_toOption (f : α → Part β) (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] [∀ a, Decidable (f a).Dom]
[Decidable (o.bind f).Dom] :
(o.bind f).toOption = o.toOption.elim Option.none fun a => (f a).toOption := by
by_cases h : o.Dom
· simp_rw [h.toOption, h.bind]
rfl
· rw [Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 h]
exact Part.toOption_eq_none_iff.2 fun ho => h ho.of_bind
#align part.bind_to_option Part.bind_toOption
theorem bind_assoc {γ} (f : Part α) (g : α → Part β) (k : β → Part γ) :
(f.bind g).bind k = f.bind fun x => (g x).bind k :=
ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_bind_iff]
exact ⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩,
fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨_, ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩⟩
#align part.bind_assoc Part.bind_assoc
@[simp]
theorem bind_map {γ} (f : α → β) (x) (g : β → Part γ) :
(map f x).bind g = x.bind fun y => g (f y) := by rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp
#align part.bind_map Part.bind_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Part.lean | 552 | 554 | theorem map_bind {γ} (f : α → Part β) (x : Part α) (g : β → γ) :
map g (x.bind f) = x.bind fun y => map g (f y) := by |
rw [← bind_some_eq_map, bind_assoc]; simp [bind_some_eq_map]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Basic
#align_import topology.nhds_set from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Set Filter Topology
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Filter X}
{s t s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set X} {x : X}
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal (X) [TopologicalSpace (X × X)] :
𝓝ˢ (diagonal X) = ⨆ (x : X), 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhdsSet, ← range_diag, ← range_comp]
rfl
#align nhds_set_diagonal nhdsSet_diagonal
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∀ x : X, x ∈ t → s ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [nhdsSet, Filter.mem_sSup, forall_mem_image]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_forall mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
lemma nhdsSet_le : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ f ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ f := by simp [nhdsSet]
theorem bUnion_mem_nhdsSet {t : X → Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ∈ 𝓝 x) : (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => mem_of_superset (h x hx) <|
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun x _ => t x) x hx -- Porting note: fails to find `s`
#align bUnion_mem_nhds_set bUnion_mem_nhdsSet
theorem subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet : s ⊆ interior t ↔ t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall, subset_interior_iff_nhds]
#align subset_interior_iff_mem_nhds_set subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet
theorem disjoint_principal_nhdsSet : Disjoint (𝓟 s) (𝓝ˢ t) ↔ Disjoint (closure s) t := by
rw [disjoint_principal_left, ← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, interior_compl,
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
theorem disjoint_nhdsSet_principal : Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓟 t) ↔ Disjoint s (closure t) := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_principal_nhdsSet, disjoint_comm]
theorem mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, subset_interior_iff]
#align mem_nhds_set_iff_exists mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_exists {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ t → p x :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists
theorem eventually_nhdsSet_iff_forall {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y :=
mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall
theorem hasBasis_nhdsSet (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).HasBasis (fun U => IsOpen U ∧ s ⊆ U) fun U => U :=
⟨fun t => by simp [mem_nhdsSet_iff_exists, and_assoc]⟩
#align has_basis_nhds_set hasBasis_nhdsSet
@[simp]
lemma lift'_nhdsSet_interior (s : Set X) : (𝓝ˢ s).lift' interior = 𝓝ˢ s :=
(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.left
lemma Filter.HasBasis.nhdsSet_interior {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {t : Set X}
(h : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝ˢ t).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhdsSet_interior t ▸ h.lift'_interior
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet (hU : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet, hU.interior_eq]
#align is_open.mem_nhds_set IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhdsSet_self (ho : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := ho.mem_nhdsSet.mpr Subset.rfl
theorem principal_le_nhdsSet : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓝ˢ s := fun _s hs =>
(subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mpr hs).trans interior_subset
#align principal_le_nhds_set principal_le_nhdsSet
theorem subset_of_mem_nhdsSet (h : t ∈ 𝓝ˢ s) : s ⊆ t := principal_le_nhdsSet h
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsSet {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝ˢ s, p x) : ∀ x ∈ s, p x :=
principal_le_nhdsSet h
nonrec theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.self_of_nhdsSet {f g : X → Y} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝ˢ s] g) : EqOn f g s :=
h.self_of_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff : 𝓝ˢ s = 𝓟 s ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← principal_le_nhdsSet.le_iff_eq, le_principal_iff, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall,
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
#align nhds_set_eq_principal_iff nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq⟩ := nhdsSet_eq_principal_iff
#align is_open.nhds_set_eq IsOpen.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_interior : 𝓝ˢ (interior s) = 𝓟 (interior s) :=
isOpen_interior.nhdsSet_eq
#align nhds_set_interior nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_singleton : 𝓝ˢ {x} = 𝓝 x := by simp [nhdsSet]
#align nhds_set_singleton nhdsSet_singleton
theorem mem_nhdsSet_interior : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (interior s) :=
subset_interior_iff_mem_nhdsSet.mp Subset.rfl
#align mem_nhds_set_interior mem_nhdsSet_interior
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_empty : 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) = ⊥ := by rw [isOpen_empty.nhdsSet_eq, principal_empty]
#align nhds_set_empty nhdsSet_empty
theorem mem_nhdsSet_empty : s ∈ 𝓝ˢ (∅ : Set X) := by simp
#align mem_nhds_set_empty mem_nhdsSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_univ : 𝓝ˢ (univ : Set X) = ⊤ := by rw [isOpen_univ.nhdsSet_eq, principal_univ]
#align nhds_set_univ nhdsSet_univ
@[mono]
theorem nhdsSet_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ 𝓝ˢ t :=
sSup_le_sSup <| image_subset _ h
#align nhds_set_mono nhdsSet_mono
theorem monotone_nhdsSet : Monotone (𝓝ˢ : Set X → Filter X) := fun _ _ => nhdsSet_mono
#align monotone_nhds_set monotone_nhdsSet
theorem nhds_le_nhdsSet (h : x ∈ s) : 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓝ˢ s :=
le_sSup <| mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align nhds_le_nhds_set nhds_le_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_union (s t : Set X) : 𝓝ˢ (s ∪ t) = 𝓝ˢ s ⊔ 𝓝ˢ t := by
simp only [nhdsSet, image_union, sSup_union]
#align nhds_set_union nhdsSet_union
theorem union_mem_nhdsSet (h₁ : s₁ ∈ 𝓝ˢ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ∈ 𝓝ˢ t₂) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∈ 𝓝ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [nhdsSet_union]
exact union_mem_sup h₁ h₂
#align union_mem_nhds_set union_mem_nhdsSet
@[simp]
theorem nhdsSet_insert (x : X) (s : Set X) : 𝓝ˢ (insert x s) = 𝓝 x ⊔ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rw [insert_eq, nhdsSet_union, nhdsSet_singleton]
theorem Continuous.tendsto_nhdsSet {f : X → Y} {t : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(hst : MapsTo f s t) : Tendsto f (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) :=
((hasBasis_nhdsSet s).tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t)).mpr fun U hU =>
⟨f ⁻¹' U, ⟨hU.1.preimage hf, hst.mono Subset.rfl hU.2⟩, fun _ => id⟩
#align continuous.tendsto_nhds_set Continuous.tendsto_nhdsSet
lemma Continuous.tendsto_nhdsSet_nhds
{y : Y} {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (h' : EqOn f (fun _ ↦ y) s) :
Tendsto f (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝 y) := by
rw [← nhdsSet_singleton]
exact h.tendsto_nhdsSet h'
theorem nhdsSet_inter_le (s t : Set X) : 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ⊓ 𝓝ˢ t :=
(monotone_nhdsSet (X := X)).map_inf_le s t
variable (s) in
| Mathlib/Topology/NhdsSet.lean | 189 | 194 | theorem IsClosed.nhdsSet_le_sup (h : IsClosed t) : 𝓝ˢ s ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) ⊔ 𝓟 (tᶜ) :=
calc
𝓝ˢ s = 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ) := by | rw [Set.inter_union_compl s t]
_ = 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) ⊔ 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ tᶜ) := by rw [nhdsSet_union]
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) ⊔ 𝓝ˢ (tᶜ) := sup_le_sup_left (monotone_nhdsSet inter_subset_right) _
_ = 𝓝ˢ (s ∩ t) ⊔ 𝓟 (tᶜ) := by rw [h.isOpen_compl.nhdsSet_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Card
import Mathlib.Data.List.MinMax
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Order.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Basic
#align_import logic.denumerable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"509de852e1de55e1efa8eacfa11df0823f26f226"
variable {α β : Type*}
class Denumerable (α : Type*) extends Encodable α where
decode_inv : ∀ n, ∃ a ∈ decode n, encode a = n
#align denumerable Denumerable
open Nat
namespace Denumerable
section
variable [Denumerable α] [Denumerable β]
open Encodable
theorem decode_isSome (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : (decode (α := α) n).isSome :=
Option.isSome_iff_exists.2 <| (decode_inv n).imp fun _ => And.left
#align denumerable.decode_is_some Denumerable.decode_isSome
def ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : α :=
Option.get _ (decode_isSome α n)
#align denumerable.of_nat Denumerable.ofNat
@[simp]
theorem decode_eq_ofNat (α) [Denumerable α] (n : ℕ) : decode (α := α) n = some (ofNat α n) :=
Option.eq_some_of_isSome _
#align denumerable.decode_eq_of_nat Denumerable.decode_eq_ofNat
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_of_decode {n b} (h : decode (α := α) n = some b) : ofNat (α := α) n = b :=
Option.some.inj <| (decode_eq_ofNat _ _).symm.trans h
#align denumerable.of_nat_of_decode Denumerable.ofNat_of_decode
@[simp]
theorem encode_ofNat (n) : encode (ofNat α n) = n := by
obtain ⟨a, h, e⟩ := decode_inv (α := α) n
rwa [ofNat_of_decode h]
#align denumerable.encode_of_nat Denumerable.encode_ofNat
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_encode (a) : ofNat α (encode a) = a :=
ofNat_of_decode (encodek _)
#align denumerable.of_nat_encode Denumerable.ofNat_encode
def eqv (α) [Denumerable α] : α ≃ ℕ :=
⟨encode, ofNat α, ofNat_encode, encode_ofNat⟩
#align denumerable.eqv Denumerable.eqv
-- See Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) : Infinite α :=
Infinite.of_surjective _ (eqv α).surjective
def mk' {α} (e : α ≃ ℕ) : Denumerable α where
encode := e
decode := some ∘ e.symm
encodek _ := congr_arg some (e.symm_apply_apply _)
decode_inv _ := ⟨_, rfl, e.apply_symm_apply _⟩
#align denumerable.mk' Denumerable.mk'
def ofEquiv (α) {β} [Denumerable α] (e : β ≃ α) : Denumerable β :=
{ Encodable.ofEquiv _ e with
decode_inv := fun n => by
-- Porting note: replaced `simp`
simp_rw [Option.mem_def, decode_ofEquiv e, encode_ofEquiv e, decode_eq_ofNat,
Option.map_some', Option.some_inj, exists_eq_left', Equiv.apply_symm_apply,
Denumerable.encode_ofNat] }
#align denumerable.of_equiv Denumerable.ofEquiv
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Logic/Denumerable.lean | 104 | 110 | theorem ofEquiv_ofNat (α) {β} [Denumerable α] (e : β ≃ α) (n) :
@ofNat β (ofEquiv _ e) n = e.symm (ofNat α n) := by |
-- Porting note: added `letI`
letI := ofEquiv _ e
refine ofNat_of_decode ?_
rw [decode_ofEquiv e]
simp
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
noncomputable section
namespace Complex
open Set Filter Bornology
open scoped Real Topology ComplexConjugate
-- Porting note: @[pp_nodot] does not exist in mathlib4
noncomputable def log (x : ℂ) : ℂ :=
x.abs.log + arg x * I
#align complex.log Complex.log
theorem log_re (x : ℂ) : x.log.re = x.abs.log := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_re Complex.log_re
theorem log_im (x : ℂ) : x.log.im = x.arg := by simp [log]
#align complex.log_im Complex.log_im
theorem neg_pi_lt_log_im (x : ℂ) : -π < (log x).im := by simp only [log_im, neg_pi_lt_arg]
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im Complex.neg_pi_lt_log_im
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Log.lean | 42 | 42 | theorem log_im_le_pi (x : ℂ) : (log x).im ≤ π := by | simp only [log_im, arg_le_pi]
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.VectorMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqOfIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.measure.with_density_vector_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d1bd9c5df2867c1cb463bc6364446d57bdd9f7f1"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
namespace MeasureTheory
open TopologicalSpace
variable {μ ν : Measure α}
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
def Measure.withDensityᵥ {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → E) : VectorMeasure α E :=
if hf : Integrable f μ then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun s hs => if_neg hs
m_iUnion' := fun s hs₁ hs₂ => by
dsimp only
convert hasSum_integral_iUnion hs₁ hs₂ hf.integrableOn with n
· rw [if_pos (hs₁ n)]
· rw [if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hs₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.measure.with_densityᵥ MeasureTheory.Measure.withDensityᵥ
open Measure
variable {f g : α → E}
theorem withDensityᵥ_apply (hf : Integrable f μ) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.withDensityᵥ f s = ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ := by rw [withDensityᵥ, dif_pos hf]; exact dif_pos hs
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_apply MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_apply
@[simp]
theorem withDensityᵥ_zero : μ.withDensityᵥ (0 : α → E) = 0 := by
ext1 s hs; erw [withDensityᵥ_apply (integrable_zero α E μ) hs]; simp
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_zero MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_zero
@[simp]
theorem withDensityᵥ_neg : μ.withDensityᵥ (-f) = -μ.withDensityᵥ f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· ext1 i hi
rw [VectorMeasure.neg_apply, withDensityᵥ_apply hf hi, ← integral_neg,
withDensityᵥ_apply hf.neg hi]
rfl
· rw [withDensityᵥ, withDensityᵥ, dif_neg hf, dif_neg, neg_zero]
rwa [integrable_neg_iff]
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_neg MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_neg
theorem withDensityᵥ_neg' : (μ.withDensityᵥ fun x => -f x) = -μ.withDensityᵥ f :=
withDensityᵥ_neg
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_neg' MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_neg'
@[simp]
theorem withDensityᵥ_add (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
μ.withDensityᵥ (f + g) = μ.withDensityᵥ f + μ.withDensityᵥ g := by
ext1 i hi
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply (hf.add hg) hi, VectorMeasure.add_apply, withDensityᵥ_apply hf hi,
withDensityᵥ_apply hg hi]
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply]
rw [integral_add] <;> rw [← integrableOn_univ]
· exact hf.integrableOn.restrict MeasurableSet.univ
· exact hg.integrableOn.restrict MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_add MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_add
theorem withDensityᵥ_add' (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
(μ.withDensityᵥ fun x => f x + g x) = μ.withDensityᵥ f + μ.withDensityᵥ g :=
withDensityᵥ_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_add' MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_add'
@[simp]
theorem withDensityᵥ_sub (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
μ.withDensityᵥ (f - g) = μ.withDensityᵥ f - μ.withDensityᵥ g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, withDensityᵥ_add hf hg.neg, withDensityᵥ_neg]
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_sub MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_sub
theorem withDensityᵥ_sub' (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
(μ.withDensityᵥ fun x => f x - g x) = μ.withDensityᵥ f - μ.withDensityᵥ g :=
withDensityᵥ_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_sub' MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_sub'
@[simp]
theorem withDensityᵥ_smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] (f : α → E) (r : 𝕜) : μ.withDensityᵥ (r • f) = r • μ.withDensityᵥ f := by
by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· ext1 i hi
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply (hf.smul r) hi, VectorMeasure.smul_apply, withDensityᵥ_apply hf hi, ←
integral_smul r f]
rfl
· by_cases hr : r = 0
· rw [hr, zero_smul, zero_smul, withDensityᵥ_zero]
· rw [withDensityᵥ, withDensityᵥ, dif_neg hf, dif_neg, smul_zero]
rwa [integrable_smul_iff hr f]
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_smul MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_smul
theorem withDensityᵥ_smul' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
[SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] (f : α → E) (r : 𝕜) :
(μ.withDensityᵥ fun x => r • f x) = r • μ.withDensityᵥ f :=
withDensityᵥ_smul f r
#align measure_theory.with_densityᵥ_smul' MeasureTheory.withDensityᵥ_smul'
theorem withDensityᵥ_smul_eq_withDensityᵥ_withDensity {f : α → ℝ≥0} {g : α → E}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hfg : Integrable (f • g) μ) :
μ.withDensityᵥ (f • g) = (μ.withDensity (fun x ↦ f x)).withDensityᵥ g := by
ext s hs
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply hfg hs,
withDensityᵥ_apply ((integrable_withDensity_iff_integrable_smul₀ hf).mpr hfg) hs,
setIntegral_withDensity_eq_setIntegral_smul₀ hf.restrict _ hs]
rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/WithDensityVectorMeasure.lean | 140 | 146 | theorem withDensityᵥ_smul_eq_withDensityᵥ_withDensity' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → E}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hflt : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞)
(hfg : Integrable (fun x ↦ (f x).toReal • g x) μ) :
μ.withDensityᵥ (fun x ↦ (f x).toReal • g x) = (μ.withDensity f).withDensityᵥ g := by |
rw [← withDensity_congr_ae (coe_toNNReal_ae_eq hflt),
← withDensityᵥ_smul_eq_withDensityᵥ_withDensity hf.ennreal_toNNReal hfg]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
#align_import algebra.euclidean_domain.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ee7b9f9a9ac2a8d9f04ea39bbfe6b1a3be053b38"
universe u
class EuclideanDomain (R : Type u) extends CommRing R, Nontrivial R where
protected quotient : R → R → R
protected quotient_zero : ∀ a, quotient a 0 = 0
protected remainder : R → R → R
protected quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq : ∀ a b, b * quotient a b + remainder a b = a
protected r : R → R → Prop
r_wellFounded : WellFounded r
protected remainder_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → r (remainder a b) b
mul_left_not_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → ¬r (a * b) a
#align euclidean_domain EuclideanDomain
#align euclidean_domain.quotient EuclideanDomain.quotient
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_zero EuclideanDomain.quotient_zero
#align euclidean_domain.remainder EuclideanDomain.remainder
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq
#align euclidean_domain.r EuclideanDomain.r
#align euclidean_domain.r_well_founded EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
#align euclidean_domain.remainder_lt EuclideanDomain.remainder_lt
#align euclidean_domain.mul_left_not_lt EuclideanDomain.mul_left_not_lt
namespace EuclideanDomain
variable {R : Type u} [EuclideanDomain R]
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => EuclideanDomain.r
local instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation R where
wf := r_wellFounded
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Div R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.quotient⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Mod R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.remainder⟩
theorem div_add_mod (a b : R) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod
theorem mod_add_div (a b : R) : a % b + b * (a / b) = a :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (div_add_mod _ _)
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div
theorem mod_add_div' (m k : R) : m % k + m / k * k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mod_add_div _ _
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div' EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div'
theorem div_add_mod' (m k : R) : m / k * k + m % k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact div_add_mod _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod' EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod'
theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {R : Type*} [EuclideanDomain R] (a b : R) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
calc
a % b = b * (a / b) + a % b - b * (a / b) := (add_sub_cancel_left _ _).symm
_ = a - b * (a / b) := by rw [div_add_mod]
#align euclidean_domain.mod_eq_sub_mul_div EuclideanDomain.mod_eq_sub_mul_div
theorem mod_lt : ∀ (a) {b : R}, b ≠ 0 → a % b ≺ b :=
EuclideanDomain.remainder_lt
#align euclidean_domain.mod_lt EuclideanDomain.mod_lt
theorem mul_right_not_lt {a : R} (b) (h : a ≠ 0) : ¬a * b ≺ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_left_not_lt b h
#align euclidean_domain.mul_right_not_lt EuclideanDomain.mul_right_not_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : R) : a % 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_mul, zero_add] using div_add_mod a 0
#align euclidean_domain.mod_zero EuclideanDomain.mod_zero
theorem lt_one (a : R) : a ≺ (1 : R) → a = 0 :=
haveI := Classical.dec
not_imp_not.1 fun h => by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_left_not_lt 1 h
#align euclidean_domain.lt_one EuclideanDomain.lt_one
theorem val_dvd_le : ∀ a b : R, b ∣ a → a ≠ 0 → ¬a ≺ b
| _, b, ⟨d, rfl⟩, ha => mul_left_not_lt b (mt (by rintro rfl; exact mul_zero _) ha)
#align euclidean_domain.val_dvd_le EuclideanDomain.val_dvd_le
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : R) : a / 0 = 0 :=
EuclideanDomain.quotient_zero a
#align euclidean_domain.div_zero EuclideanDomain.div_zero
section
open scoped Classical
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem GCD.induction {P : R → R → Prop} (a b : R) (H0 : ∀ x, P 0 x)
(H1 : ∀ a b, a ≠ 0 → P (b % a) a → P a b) : P a b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by
-- Porting note: required for hygiene, the equation compiler introduces a dummy variable `x`
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/unnecessarily.20tombstoned.20argument/near/314573315
change P a b
exact a0.symm ▸ H0 b
else
have _ := mod_lt b a0
H1 _ _ a0 (GCD.induction (b % a) a H0 H1)
termination_by a
#align euclidean_domain.gcd.induction EuclideanDomain.GCD.induction
end
section GCD
variable [DecidableEq R]
def gcd (a b : R) : R :=
if a0 : a = 0 then b
else
have _ := mod_lt b a0
gcd (b % a) a
termination_by a
#align euclidean_domain.gcd EuclideanDomain.gcd
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (a : R) : gcd 0 a = a := by
rw [gcd]
exact if_pos rfl
#align euclidean_domain.gcd_zero_left EuclideanDomain.gcd_zero_left
def xgcdAux (r s t r' s' t' : R) : R × R × R :=
if _hr : r = 0 then (r', s', t')
else
let q := r' / r
have _ := mod_lt r' _hr
xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) r s t
termination_by r
#align euclidean_domain.xgcd_aux EuclideanDomain.xgcdAux
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t' : R} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by
unfold xgcdAux
exact if_pos rfl
#align euclidean_domain.xgcd_zero_left EuclideanDomain.xgcd_zero_left
| Mathlib/Algebra/EuclideanDomain/Defs.lean | 238 | 243 | theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t' : R} (h : r ≠ 0) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by |
conv =>
lhs
rw [xgcdAux]
exact if_neg h
|
import Mathlib.Topology.LocalAtTarget
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.Basic
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.open_immersion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
theorem isOpenImmersion_iff_stalk {f : X ⟶ Y} : IsOpenImmersion f ↔
OpenEmbedding f.1.base ∧ ∀ x, IsIso (PresheafedSpace.stalkMap f.1 x) := by
constructor
· intro h; exact ⟨h.1, inferInstance⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; exact IsOpenImmersion.of_stalk_iso f h₁
#align algebraic_geometry.is_open_immersion_iff_stalk AlgebraicGeometry.isOpenImmersion_iff_stalk
instance isOpenImmersion_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @IsOpenImmersion where
comp_mem f g _ _ := LocallyRingedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp f g
#align algebraic_geometry.is_open_immersion_stable_under_composition AlgebraicGeometry.isOpenImmersion_isStableUnderComposition
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/OpenImmersion.lean | 46 | 50 | theorem isOpenImmersion_respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @IsOpenImmersion := by |
apply MorphismProperty.respectsIso_of_isStableUnderComposition
intro _ _ f (hf : IsIso f)
have : IsIso f := hf
infer_instance
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.ULift
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EssentiallySmall
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import category_theory.limits.has_limits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2738d2ca56cbc63be80c3bd48e9ed90ad94e947d"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
universe v₁ u₁ v₂ u₂ v₃ u₃ v v' v'' u u' u''
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
section Limit
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance] -- Porting note(#5171): removed; linter not ported yet
structure LimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) where
cone : Cone F
isLimit : IsLimit cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone
#align category_theory.limits.limit_cone.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.LimitCone.isLimit
class HasLimit (F : J ⥤ C) : Prop where mk' ::
exists_limit : Nonempty (LimitCone F)
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit
theorem HasLimit.mk {F : J ⥤ C} (d : LimitCone F) : HasLimit F :=
⟨Nonempty.intro d⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.mk CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.mk
def getLimitCone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : LimitCone F :=
Classical.choice <| HasLimit.exists_limit
#align category_theory.limits.get_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.getLimitCone
variable (J C)
class HasLimitsOfShape : Prop where
has_limit : ∀ F : J ⥤ C, HasLimit F := by infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfShape
@[pp_with_univ]
class HasLimitsOfSize (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
has_limits_of_shape : ∀ (J : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} J], HasLimitsOfShape J C := by
infer_instance
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_size CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimitsOfSize
abbrev HasLimits (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop :=
HasLimitsOfSize.{v, v} C
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
theorem HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [HasLimits C] (J : Type v)
[Category.{v} J] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits.has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits.has_limits_of_shape
variable {J C}
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfShape J C] (F : J ⥤ C) : HasLimit F :=
HasLimitsOfShape.has_limit F
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_has_limits_of_shape CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfHasLimitsOfShape
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J]
[HasLimitsOfSize.{v₁, u₁} C] : HasLimitsOfShape J C :=
HasLimitsOfSize.has_limits_of_shape J
#align category_theory.limits.has_limits_of_shape_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitsOfShapeOfHasLimits
-- Interface to the `HasLimit` class.
def limit.cone (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : Cone F :=
(getLimitCone F).cone
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone
def limit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] :=
(limit.cone F).pt
#align category_theory.limits.limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit
def limit.π (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (j : J) : limit F ⟶ F.obj j :=
(limit.cone F).π.app j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.π
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_x {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).pt = limit F :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_X CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_x
@[simp]
theorem limit.cone_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : (limit.cone F).π.app = limit.π _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.cone_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.w (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j') :
limit.π F j ≫ F.map f = limit.π F j' :=
(limit.cone F).w f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.w CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.w
def limit.isLimit (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] : IsLimit (limit.cone F) :=
(getLimitCone F).isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit
def limit.lift (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c.pt ⟶ limit F :=
(limit.isLimit F).lift c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift
@[simp]
theorem limit.isLimit_lift {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.isLimit F).lift c = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.is_limit_lift CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isLimit_lift
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.lift_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.fac _ c j
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_π
def limMap {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) : limit F ⟶ limit G :=
IsLimit.map _ (limit.isLimit G) α
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limMap_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
limMap α ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ α.app j :=
limit.lift_π _ j
#align category_theory.limits.lim_map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limMap_π
def limit.coneMorphism {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) : c ⟶ limit.cone F :=
(limit.isLimit F).liftConeMorphism c
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism
@[simp]
theorem limit.coneMorphism_hom {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom = limit.lift F c :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_hom
theorem limit.coneMorphism_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) (j : J) :
(limit.coneMorphism c).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j := by simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_morphism_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.coneMorphism_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hc (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_hom_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_hom_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {c : Cone F} (hc : IsLimit c)
(j : J) : (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) hc).inv ≫ limit.π F j = c.π.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.cone_point_unique_up_to_iso_inv_comp CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.conePointUniqueUpToIso_inv_comp
theorem limit.existsUnique {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : Cone F) :
∃! l : t.pt ⟶ limit F, ∀ j, l ≫ limit.π F j = t.π.app j :=
(limit.isLimit F).existsUnique _
#align category_theory.limits.limit.exists_unique CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.existsUnique
def limit.isoLimitCone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) : limit F ≅ t.cone.pt :=
IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit F) t.isLimit
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).hom ≫ t.cone.π.app j = limit.π F j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (t : LimitCone F) (j : J) :
(limit.isoLimitCone t).inv ≫ limit.π F j = t.cone.π.app j := by
dsimp [limit.isoLimitCone, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso]
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.iso_limit_cone_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.isoLimitCone_inv_π
@[ext]
theorem limit.hom_ext {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {X : C} {f f' : X ⟶ limit F}
(w : ∀ j, f ≫ limit.π F j = f' ≫ limit.π F j) : f = f' :=
(limit.isLimit F).hom_ext w
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_ext CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.hom_ext
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_map {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (c : Cone F) (α : F ⟶ G) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limMap α = limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose α).obj c) := by
ext
rw [assoc, limMap_π, limit.lift_π_assoc, limit.lift_π]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_map CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_map
@[simp]
theorem limit.lift_cone {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] : limit.lift F (limit.cone F) = 𝟙 (limit F) :=
(limit.isLimit _).lift_self
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_cone CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_cone
def limit.homIso (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅ F.cones.obj (op W) :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso
@[simp]
theorem limit.homIso_hom (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] {W : C} (f : ULift (W ⟶ limit F)) :
(limit.homIso F W).hom f = (const J).map f.down ≫ (limit.cone F).π :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso_hom f
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso_hom
def limit.homIso' (F : J ⥤ C) [HasLimit F] (W : C) :
ULift.{u₁} (W ⟶ limit F : Type v) ≅
{ p : ∀ j, W ⟶ F.obj j // ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), p j ≫ F.map f = p j' } :=
(limit.isLimit F).homIso' W
#align category_theory.limits.limit.hom_iso' CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.homIso'
theorem limit.lift_extend {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (c : Cone F) {X : C} (f : X ⟶ c.pt) :
limit.lift F (c.extend f) = f ≫ limit.lift F c := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.limit.lift_extend CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.lift_extend
theorem hasLimitOfIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] (α : F ≅ G) : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk
{ cone := (Cones.postcompose α.hom).obj (limit.cone F)
isLimit := (IsLimit.postcomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm (limit.isLimit F) }
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit_of_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.hasLimitOfIso
-- See the construction of limits from products and equalizers
-- for an example usage.
theorem HasLimit.ofConesIso {J K : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] [Category.{v₂} K] (F : J ⥤ C)
(G : K ⥤ C) (h : F.cones ≅ G.cones) [HasLimit F] : HasLimit G :=
HasLimit.mk ⟨_, IsLimit.ofNatIso (IsLimit.natIso (limit.isLimit F) ≪≫ h)⟩
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.of_cones_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.ofConesIso
def HasLimit.isoOfNatIso {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom ≫ limit.π G j = limit.π F j ≫ w.hom.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_hom_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (w : F ≅ G) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv ≫ limit.π F j = limit.π G j ≫ w.inv.app j :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv_comp _ _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_nat_iso_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfNatIso_inv_π
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone F)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift F t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).hom =
limit.lift G ((Cones.postcompose w.hom).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_hom _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_hom CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv {F G : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] [HasLimit G] (t : Cone G)
(w : F ≅ G) :
limit.lift G t ≫ (HasLimit.isoOfNatIso w).inv =
limit.lift F ((Cones.postcompose w.inv).obj _) :=
IsLimit.lift_comp_conePointsIsoOfNatIso_inv _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.lift_iso_of_nat_iso_inv CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.lift_isoOfNatIso_inv
def HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G] (e : J ≌ K)
(w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) : limit F ≅ limit G :=
IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence (limit.isLimit F) (limit.isLimit G) e w
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (k : K) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).hom ≫ limit.π G k =
limit.π F (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ w.inv.app (e.inverse.obj k) ≫ G.map (e.counit.app k) := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_hom_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π
@[simp]
theorem HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π {F : J ⥤ C} [HasLimit F] {G : K ⥤ C} [HasLimit G]
(e : J ≌ K) (w : e.functor ⋙ G ≅ F) (j : J) :
(HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence e w).inv ≫ limit.π F j =
limit.π G (e.functor.obj j) ≫ w.hom.app j := by
simp only [HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence, IsLimit.conePointsIsoOfEquivalence_hom]
dsimp
simp
#align category_theory.limits.has_limit.iso_of_equivalence_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π
section Pre
variable (F) [HasLimit F] (E : K ⥤ J) [HasLimit (E ⋙ F)]
def limit.pre : limit F ⟶ limit (E ⋙ F) :=
limit.lift (E ⋙ F) ((limit.cone F).whisker E)
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem limit.pre_π (k : K) : limit.pre F E ≫ limit.π (E ⋙ F) k = limit.π F (E.obj k) := by
erw [IsLimit.fac]
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.limit.pre_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limit.pre_π
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/HasLimits.lean | 410 | 411 | theorem limit.lift_pre (c : Cone F) :
limit.lift F c ≫ limit.pre F E = limit.lift (E ⋙ F) (c.whisker E) := by | ext; simp
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.QuasiSeparated
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.quasi_separated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1a51edf13debfcbe223fa06b1cb353b9ed9751cc"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparated (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
diagonalQuasiCompact : QuasiCompact (pullback.diagonal f) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated
def QuasiSeparated.affineProperty : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ _ _ =>
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ ∀ U V : X.affineOpens, IsCompact (U ∩ V : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
constructor
· intro H U V; exact H U V U.1.2 U.2.isCompact V.1.2 V.2.isCompact
· intro H
suffices
∀ (U : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact U.1) (V : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact V.1),
IsCompact (U ⊓ V).1
by intro U V hU hU' hV hV'; exact this ⟨U, hU⟩ hU' ⟨V, hV⟩ hV'
intro U hU V hV
-- Porting note: it complains "unable to find motive", but telling Lean that motive is
-- underscore is actually sufficient, weird
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) V hV
· simp
· intro S _ V hV
change IsCompact (U.1 ∩ (S.1 ∪ V.1))
rw [Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
apply hV.union
clear hV
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) U hU
· simp
· intro S _ W hW
change IsCompact ((S.1 ∪ W.1) ∩ V.1)
rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
apply hW.union
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine]
constructor
· intro H U V
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
haveI : IsAffine _ := V.2
let g : pullback (X.ofRestrict U.1.openEmbedding) (X.ofRestrict V.1.openEmbedding) ⟶ X :=
pullback.fst ≫ X.ofRestrict _
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
erw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe] at e
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
exact @Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _ (H _ _) e
· introv H h₁ h₂
let g : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ X := pullback.fst ≫ f₁
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
simp_rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at H
exact
@Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _
(H ⟨⟨_, h₁.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩)
e.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_iff_quasi_separated_space AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact :
@QuasiSeparated = MorphismProperty.diagonal @QuasiCompact := by ext; exact quasiSeparated_iff _
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_diagonal_is_quasi_compact AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq :
QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal = QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
funext; rw [quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_diagonal_eq AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact, quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty]
exact
diagonal_targetAffineLocally_eq_targetAffineLocally _ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property_diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal, quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty
theorem QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal : QuasiSeparated.affineProperty.IsLocal :=
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq ▸ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal
instance (priority := 900) quasiSeparatedOfMono {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
QuasiSeparated f where
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_of_mono AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedOfMono
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
(MorphismProperty.diagonal_isStableUnderComposition
quasiCompact_respectsIso quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange)
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_composition AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition
theorem quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange :
MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange.diagonal quasiCompact_respectsIso
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_base_change AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange
instance quasiSeparatedComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f]
[QuasiSeparated g] : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedComp
theorem quasiSeparated_respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ quasiCompact_respectsIso.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_respectsIso
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f g).carrier,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)) (𝒰' :
∀ i : 𝒰.J, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) (_ :
∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)),
∀ (i : 𝒰.J) (j k : (𝒰' i).J),
CompactSpace (pullback ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).carrier] := by
have := QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f
simp_rw [← quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty, ← quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact,
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq] at this
exact this
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal.symm ▸
QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.is_local_at_target AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ 𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y,
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ U : Opens Y.carrier, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤),
∀ i, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U i)] :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_TFAE f
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE
theorem quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_target_iff f, QuasiSeparated.affineProperty]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_over_affine_iff AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ QuasiSeparated (terminal.from X) :=
(quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff _).symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y)
[∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_openCover_iff f 𝒰]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_iff f 𝒰
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.fst f g inferInstance
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated f] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.snd f g inferInstance
instance {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f] [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[hY : QuasiSeparatedSpace Y.carrier] [QuasiSeparated f] : QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated] at hY ⊢
have : f ≫ terminal.from Y = terminal.from X := terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext _ _
rw [← this]
infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_of_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated
instance quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine (X : Scheme) [IsAffine X] :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
constructor
intro U V hU hU' hV hV'
obtain ⟨s, hs, e⟩ := (isCompact_open_iff_eq_basicOpen_union _).mp ⟨hU', hU⟩
obtain ⟨s', hs', e'⟩ := (isCompact_open_iff_eq_basicOpen_union _).mp ⟨hV', hV⟩
rw [e, e', Set.iUnion₂_inter]
simp_rw [Set.inter_iUnion₂]
apply hs.isCompact_biUnion
intro i _
apply hs'.isCompact_biUnion
intro i' _
change IsCompact (X.basicOpen i ⊓ X.basicOpen i').1
rw [← Scheme.basicOpen_mul]
exact ((topIsAffineOpen _).basicOpenIsAffine _).isCompact
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_of_is_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine
theorem IsAffineOpen.isQuasiSeparated {X : Scheme} {U : Opens X.carrier} (hU : IsAffineOpen U) :
IsQuasiSeparated (U : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]
exacts [@AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_of_isAffine _ hU, U.isOpen]
#align algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.is_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.isQuasiSeparated
theorem quasiSeparatedOfComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [H : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g)] :
QuasiSeparated f := by
-- Porting note: rewrite `(QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1` directly fails, but
-- give it a name works
have h01 := (QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1
rw [h01]; clear h01
-- Porting note: rewrite `(QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE ...).out 0 2` directly fails, but
-- give it a name works
have h02 := (QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE (f ≫ g)).out 0 2
rw [h02] at H; clear h02
refine ⟨(Z.affineCover.pullbackCover g).bind fun x => Scheme.affineCover _, ?_, ?_⟩
-- constructor
· intro i; dsimp; infer_instance
rintro ⟨i, j⟩; dsimp at i j
-- replace H := H (Scheme.OpenCover.pullbackCover (Scheme.affineCover Z) g) i
specialize H _ i
-- rw [← isQuasiSeparated_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace] at H
refine @quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated _ _ ?_ H ?_
· exact pullback.map _ _ _ _ (𝟙 _) _ _ (by simp) (Category.comp_id _) ≫
(pullbackRightPullbackFstIso g (Z.affineCover.map i) f).hom
· exact inferInstance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_of_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedOfComp
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_isAffineOpen (X : Scheme) (U : Opens X.carrier) (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
(f : X.presheaf.obj (op U)) (x : X.presheaf.obj (op <| X.basicOpen f)) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (y : X.presheaf.obj (op U)), y |_ X.basicOpen f = (f |_ X.basicOpen f) ^ n * x := by
have := (hU.isLocalization_basicOpen f).2
obtain ⟨⟨y, _, n, rfl⟩, d⟩ := this x
use n, y
delta TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen TopCat.Presheaf.restrict
simpa [mul_comm x] using d.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_affine_open AlgebraicGeometry.exists_eq_pow_mul_of_isAffineOpen
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiSeparated.lean | 310 | 322 | theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_of_is_compact_of_quasi_separated_space_aux_aux {X : TopCat}
(F : X.Presheaf CommRingCat) {U₁ U₂ U₃ U₄ U₅ U₆ U₇ : Opens X} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ}
{y₁ : F.obj (op U₁)} {y₂ : F.obj (op U₂)} {f : F.obj (op <| U₁ ⊔ U₂)}
{x : F.obj (op U₃)} (h₄₁ : U₄ ≤ U₁) (h₄₂ : U₄ ≤ U₂) (h₅₁ : U₅ ≤ U₁) (h₅₃ : U₅ ≤ U₃)
(h₆₂ : U₆ ≤ U₂) (h₆₃ : U₆ ≤ U₃) (h₇₄ : U₇ ≤ U₄) (h₇₅ : U₇ ≤ U₅) (h₇₆ : U₇ ≤ U₆)
(e₁ : y₁ |_ U₅ = (f |_ U₁ |_ U₅) ^ n₁ * x |_ U₅)
(e₂ : y₂ |_ U₆ = (f |_ U₂ |_ U₆) ^ n₂ * x |_ U₆) :
(((f |_ U₁) ^ n₂ * y₁) |_ U₄) |_ U₇ = (((f |_ U₂) ^ n₁ * y₂) |_ U₄) |_ U₇ := by |
apply_fun (fun x : F.obj (op U₅) ↦ x |_ U₇) at e₁
apply_fun (fun x : F.obj (op U₆) ↦ x |_ U₇) at e₂
dsimp only [TopCat.Presheaf.restrictOpen, TopCat.Presheaf.restrict] at e₁ e₂ ⊢
simp only [map_mul, map_pow, ← comp_apply, ← op_comp, ← F.map_comp, homOfLE_comp] at e₁ e₂ ⊢
rw [e₁, e₂, mul_left_comm]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Comma.Over
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Yoneda
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
#align_import category_theory.sites.sieves from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"239d882c4fb58361ee8b3b39fb2091320edef10a"
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
#align category_theory.presieve CategoryTheory.Presieve
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
fullSubcategoryInclusion _ ⋙ Over.forget X
#align category_theory.presieve.diagram CategoryTheory.Presieve.diagram
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (fullSubcategoryInclusion _)
#align category_theory.presieve.cocone CategoryTheory.Presieve.cocone
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
#align category_theory.presieve.bind CategoryTheory.Presieve.bind
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.bind_comp CategoryTheory.Presieve.bind_comp
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
#align category_theory.presieve.singleton CategoryTheory.Presieve.singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
#align category_theory.presieve.singleton_eq_iff_domain CategoryTheory.Presieve.singleton_eq_iff_domain
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
#align category_theory.presieve.singleton_self CategoryTheory.Presieve.singleton_self
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd : pullback h f ⟶ Y)
#align category_theory.presieve.pullback_arrows CategoryTheory.Presieve.pullbackArrows
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 125 | 133 | theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd : pullback g f ⟶ _) := by |
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.UniformLimitsDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FunctionSeries
#align_import analysis.complex.locally_uniform_limit from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fe44cd36149e675eb5dec87acc7e8f1d6568e081"
open Set Metric MeasureTheory Filter Complex intervalIntegral
open scoped Real Topology
variable {E ι : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [CompleteSpace E] {U K : Set ℂ}
{z : ℂ} {M r δ : ℝ} {φ : Filter ι} {F : ι → ℂ → E} {f g : ℂ → E}
namespace Complex
section Cderiv
noncomputable def cderiv (r : ℝ) (f : ℂ → E) (z : ℂ) : E :=
(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ w in C(z, r), ((w - z) ^ 2)⁻¹ • f w
#align complex.cderiv Complex.cderiv
theorem cderiv_eq_deriv (hU : IsOpen U) (hf : DifferentiableOn ℂ f U) (hr : 0 < r)
(hzr : closedBall z r ⊆ U) : cderiv r f z = deriv f z :=
two_pi_I_inv_smul_circleIntegral_sub_sq_inv_smul_of_differentiable hU hzr hf (mem_ball_self hr)
#align complex.cderiv_eq_deriv Complex.cderiv_eq_deriv
theorem norm_cderiv_le (hr : 0 < r) (hf : ∀ w ∈ sphere z r, ‖f w‖ ≤ M) :
‖cderiv r f z‖ ≤ M / r := by
have hM : 0 ≤ M := by
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ : (sphere z r).Nonempty := NormedSpace.sphere_nonempty.mpr hr.le
exact (norm_nonneg _).trans (hf w hw)
have h1 : ∀ w ∈ sphere z r, ‖((w - z) ^ 2)⁻¹ • f w‖ ≤ M / r ^ 2 := by
intro w hw
simp only [mem_sphere_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs] at hw
simp only [norm_smul, inv_mul_eq_div, hw, norm_eq_abs, map_inv₀, Complex.abs_pow]
exact div_le_div hM (hf w hw) (sq_pos_of_pos hr) le_rfl
have h2 := circleIntegral.norm_integral_le_of_norm_le_const hr.le h1
simp only [cderiv, norm_smul]
refine (mul_le_mul le_rfl h2 (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
field_simp [_root_.abs_of_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le]
ring
#align complex.norm_cderiv_le Complex.norm_cderiv_le
| Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/LocallyUniformLimit.lean | 67 | 76 | theorem cderiv_sub (hr : 0 < r) (hf : ContinuousOn f (sphere z r))
(hg : ContinuousOn g (sphere z r)) : cderiv r (f - g) z = cderiv r f z - cderiv r g z := by |
have h1 : ContinuousOn (fun w : ℂ => ((w - z) ^ 2)⁻¹) (sphere z r) := by
refine ((continuous_id'.sub continuous_const).pow 2).continuousOn.inv₀ fun w hw h => hr.ne ?_
rwa [mem_sphere_iff_norm, sq_eq_zero_iff.mp h, norm_zero] at hw
simp_rw [cderiv, ← smul_sub]
congr 1
simpa only [Pi.sub_apply, smul_sub] using
circleIntegral.integral_sub ((h1.smul hf).circleIntegrable hr.le)
((h1.smul hg).circleIntegrable hr.le)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.lpSpace
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
#align_import topology.metric_space.kuratowski from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"95d4f6586d313c8c28e00f36621d2a6a66893aa6"
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Set Metric TopologicalSpace NNReal ENNReal lp Function
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
namespace KuratowskiEmbedding
variable {f g : ℓ^∞(ℕ)} {n : ℕ} {C : ℝ} [MetricSpace α] (x : ℕ → α) (a b : α)
def embeddingOfSubset : ℓ^∞(ℕ) :=
⟨fun n => dist a (x n) - dist (x 0) (x n), by
apply memℓp_infty
use dist a (x 0)
rintro - ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact abs_dist_sub_le _ _ _⟩
#align Kuratowski_embedding.embedding_of_subset KuratowskiEmbedding.embeddingOfSubset
theorem embeddingOfSubset_coe : embeddingOfSubset x a n = dist a (x n) - dist (x 0) (x n) :=
rfl
#align Kuratowski_embedding.embedding_of_subset_coe KuratowskiEmbedding.embeddingOfSubset_coe
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Kuratowski.lean | 52 | 57 | theorem embeddingOfSubset_dist_le (a b : α) :
dist (embeddingOfSubset x a) (embeddingOfSubset x b) ≤ dist a b := by |
refine lp.norm_le_of_forall_le dist_nonneg fun n => ?_
simp only [lp.coeFn_sub, Pi.sub_apply, embeddingOfSubset_coe, Real.dist_eq]
convert abs_dist_sub_le a b (x n) using 2
ring
|
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import data.is_R_or_C.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"baa88307f3e699fa7054ef04ec79fa4f056169cb"
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
open ComplexConjugate
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
re : K →+ ℝ
im : K →+ ℝ
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
#align is_R_or_C RCLike
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
open ComplexConjugate
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_coe RCLike.algebraMapCoe
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_alg RCLike.ofReal_alg
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_mul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_mul
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_eq_coe_smul RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.algebra_map_eq_of_real RCLike.algebraMap_eq_ofReal
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.re_add_im RCLike.re_add_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_re RCLike.ofReal_re
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_im RCLike.ofReal_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_re RCLike.mul_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
#align is_R_or_C.mul_im RCLike.mul_im
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext_iff RCLike.ext_iff
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
#align is_R_or_C.ext RCLike.ext
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_zero RCLike.ofReal_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
#align is_R_or_C.zero_re' RCLike.zero_re'
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_one RCLike.ofReal_one
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.one_re RCLike.one_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.one_im RCLike.one_im
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_injective RCLike.ofReal_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_inj RCLike.ofReal_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_re
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_re
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit0_im
#noalign is_R_or_C.bit1_im
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_eq_zero RCLike.ofReal_eq_zero
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_ne_zero RCLike.ofReal_ne_zero
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_add RCLike.ofReal_add
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit0
#noalign is_R_or_C.of_real_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_neg RCLike.ofReal_neg
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sub RCLike.ofReal_sub
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_sum RCLike.ofReal_sum
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_sum RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_sum
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul RCLike.ofReal_mul
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_pow RCLike.ofReal_pow
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_prod RCLike.ofReal_prod
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_prod {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsupp_prod _ f g
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_finsupp_prod RCLike.ofReal_finsupp_prod
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
#align is_R_or_C.real_smul_of_real RCLike.real_smul_ofReal
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_re RCLike.re_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_mul_im RCLike.im_ofReal_mul
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_re RCLike.smul_re
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.smul_im RCLike.smul_im
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
#align is_R_or_C.norm_of_real RCLike.norm_ofReal
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.char_zero_R_or_C RCLike.charZero_rclike
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_re RCLike.I_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_im RCLike.I_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_im' RCLike.I_im'
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_mul_re RCLike.I_mul_re
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_mul_I RCLike.I_mul_I
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.conj_re RCLike.conj_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.conj_im RCLike.conj_im
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.conj_I RCLike.conj_I
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_of_real RCLike.conj_ofReal
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
#noalign is_R_or_C.conj_bit0
#noalign is_R_or_C.conj_bit1
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : K)) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (#10618): was a `simp` but `simp` can prove it
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.conj_neg_I RCLike.conj_neg_I
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_eq_re_sub_im RCLike.conj_eq_re_sub_im
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
#align is_R_or_C.sub_conj RCLike.sub_conj
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_smul RCLike.conj_smul
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.add_conj RCLike.add_conj
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
#align is_R_or_C.re_eq_add_conj RCLike.re_eq_add_conj
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align is_R_or_C.im_eq_conj_sub RCLike.im_eq_conj_sub
open List in
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro h
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro h
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1
· exact fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
#align is_R_or_C.is_real_tfae RCLike.is_real_TFAE
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
((is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1).trans <| by simp only [eq_comm]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_eq_iff_real RCLike.conj_eq_iff_real
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
#align is_R_or_C.conj_eq_iff_re RCLike.conj_eq_iff_re
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
#align is_R_or_C.conj_eq_iff_im RCLike.conj_eq_iff_im
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.star_def RCLike.star_def
variable (K)
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
#align is_R_or_C.conj_to_ring_equiv RCLike.conjToRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq RCLike.normSq
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_apply RCLike.normSq_apply
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_eq_def RCLike.norm_sq_eq_def
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_eq_def' RCLike.normSq_eq_def'
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_zero RCLike.normSq_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_one RCLike.normSq_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_nonneg RCLike.normSq_nonneg
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_eq_zero RCLike.normSq_eq_zero
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_pos RCLike.normSq_pos
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_neg RCLike.normSq_neg
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_conj RCLike.normSq_conj
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_mul RCLike.normSq_mul
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_add RCLike.normSq_add
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
#align is_R_or_C.re_sq_le_norm_sq RCLike.re_sq_le_normSq
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
#align is_R_or_C.im_sq_le_norm_sq RCLike.im_sq_le_normSq
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
#align is_R_or_C.mul_conj RCLike.mul_conj
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
#align is_R_or_C.conj_mul RCLike.conj_mul
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left $ by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_sub RCLike.normSq_sub
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
#align is_R_or_C.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm RCLike.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_inv RCLike.ofReal_inv
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel]
simpa
#align is_R_or_C.inv_def RCLike.inv_def
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.inv_re RCLike.inv_re
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.inv_im RCLike.inv_im
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
#align is_R_or_C.div_re RCLike.div_re
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
#align is_R_or_C.div_im RCLike.div_im
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv' _
#align is_R_or_C.conj_inv RCLike.conj_inv
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_div RCLike.ofReal_div
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
#align is_R_or_C.div_re_of_real RCLike.div_re_ofReal
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_zpow RCLike.ofReal_zpow
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.I_mul_I_of_nonzero RCLike.I_mul_I_of_nonzero
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.inv_I RCLike.inv_I
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_R_or_C.div_I RCLike.div_I
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_inv RCLike.normSq_inv
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
#align is_R_or_C.norm_sq_div RCLike.normSq_div
@[rclike_simps] -- porting note (#10618): was `simp`
theorem norm_conj {z : K} : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj]
#align is_R_or_C.norm_conj RCLike.norm_conj
instance (priority := 100) : CstarRing K where
norm_star_mul_self {x} := (norm_mul _ _).trans <| congr_arg (· * ‖x‖) norm_conj
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_natCast (algebraMap ℝ K) n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_nat_cast RCLike.ofReal_natCast
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.nat_cast_re RCLike.natCast_re
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.nat_cast_im RCLike.natCast_im
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : re (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : K) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
natCast_re n
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : im (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : K) = 0 :=
natCast_im n
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : ℝ) : K) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ofReal_natCast n
theorem ofNat_mul_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
re (OfNat.ofNat n * z) = OfNat.ofNat n * re z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, re_ofReal_mul]
theorem ofNat_mul_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (z : K) :
im (OfNat.ofNat n * z) = OfNat.ofNat n * im z := by
rw [← ofReal_ofNat, im_ofReal_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_intCast (n : ℤ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_intCast _ n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_int_cast RCLike.ofReal_intCast
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : re (n : K) = n := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.int_cast_re RCLike.intCast_re
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : im (n : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_intCast, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.int_cast_im RCLike.intCast_im
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_ratCast (n : ℚ) : ((n : ℝ) : K) = n :=
map_ratCast _ n
#align is_R_or_C.of_real_rat_cast RCLike.ofReal_ratCast
@[simp, rclike_simps] -- Porting note: removed `norm_cast`
theorem ratCast_re (q : ℚ) : re (q : K) = q := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_re]
#align is_R_or_C.rat_cast_re RCLike.ratCast_re
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ratCast_im (q : ℚ) : im (q : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_ratCast, ofReal_im]
#align is_R_or_C.rat_cast_im RCLike.ratCast_im
theorem norm_of_nonneg {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r) : ‖(r : K)‖ = r :=
(norm_ofReal _).trans (abs_of_nonneg h)
#align is_R_or_C.norm_of_nonneg RCLike.norm_of_nonneg
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : ‖(n : K)‖ = n := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast]
exact norm_of_nonneg (Nat.cast_nonneg n)
#align is_R_or_C.norm_nat_cast RCLike.norm_natCast
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem norm_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ‖(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : K)‖ = OfNat.ofNat n :=
norm_natCast n
variable (K) in
lemma norm_nsmul [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E] (n : ℕ) (x : E) : ‖n • x‖ = n • ‖x‖ := by
rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast K, norm_smul, RCLike.norm_natCast, nsmul_eq_mul]
theorem mul_self_norm (z : K) : ‖z‖ * ‖z‖ = normSq z := by rw [normSq_eq_def', sq]
#align is_R_or_C.mul_self_norm RCLike.mul_self_norm
attribute [rclike_simps] norm_zero norm_one norm_eq_zero abs_norm norm_inv norm_div
-- Porting note: removed @[simp, rclike_simps], b/c generalized to `norm_ofNat`
theorem norm_two : ‖(2 : K)‖ = 2 := norm_ofNat 2
#align is_R_or_C.norm_two RCLike.norm_two
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 721 | 723 | theorem abs_re_le_norm (z : K) : |re z| ≤ ‖z‖ := by |
rw [mul_self_le_mul_self_iff (abs_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _), abs_mul_abs_self, mul_self_norm]
apply re_sq_le_normSq
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section Equiv
variable (R) [CommSemiring R]
@[simps]
def pUnitAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial PUnit R ≃ₐ[R] R[X] where
toFun := eval₂ Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
invFun := Polynomial.eval₂ MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
left_inv := by
let f : R[X] →+* MvPolynomial PUnit R := Polynomial.eval₂RingHom MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
let g : MvPolynomial PUnit R →+* R[X] := eval₂Hom Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
show ∀ p, f.comp g p = p
apply is_id
· ext a
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_C, Polynomial.eval₂_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_X]
right_inv p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun a => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_C, MvPolynomial.eval₂_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_add, MvPolynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq]) fun p n _ => by
rw [Polynomial.eval₂_mul, Polynomial.eval₂_pow, Polynomial.eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]
map_mul' _ _ := eval₂_mul _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
commutes' _ := eval₂_C _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.punit_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv
section
variable (S₁ S₂ S₃)
def sumToIter : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R →+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
eval₂Hom (C.comp C) fun bc => Sum.recOn bc X (C ∘ X)
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter MvPolynomial.sumToIter
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_C (a : R) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_C MvPolynomial.sumToIter_C
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xl (b : S₁) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inl b)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xl MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xl
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xr (c : S₂) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inr c)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xr MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xr
def iterToSum : MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) →+* MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R :=
eval₂Hom (eval₂Hom C (X ∘ Sum.inr)) (X ∘ Sum.inl)
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum MvPolynomial.iterToSum
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_C (a : R) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (C a)) = C a :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_C MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_C
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_X (b : S₁) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (X b) = X (Sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_X
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_X (c : S₂) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (X c)) = X (Sum.inr c) :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_X
variable (σ)
@[simps!]
def isEmptyAlgEquiv [he : IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] R :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (aeval (IsEmpty.elim he)) (Algebra.ofId _ _)
(by ext)
(by
ext i m
exact IsEmpty.elim' he i)
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyAlgEquiv
@[simps!]
def isEmptyRingEquiv [IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃+* R :=
(isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ).toRingEquiv
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyRingEquiv
variable {σ}
@[simps]
def mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial [CommSemiring S₃] (f : MvPolynomial S₁ R →+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃)
(g : MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ →+* MvPolynomial S₁ R) (hfgC : (f.comp g).comp C = C)
(hfgX : ∀ n, f (g (X n)) = X n) (hgfC : (g.comp f).comp C = C) (hgfX : ∀ n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
MvPolynomial S₁ R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX
right_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX
map_mul' := f.map_mul
map_add' := f.map_add
#align mv_polynomial.mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial MvPolynomial.mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial
def sumRingEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) := by
apply mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial R (Sum S₁ S₂) _ _ (sumToIter R S₁ S₂) (iterToSum R S₁ S₂)
· refine RingHom.ext (hom_eq_hom _ _ ?hC ?hX)
case hC => ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_C, sumToIter_C]
case hX => intro; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_X, sumToIter_Xr]
· simp [iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xl]
· ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, sumToIter_C, iterToSum_C_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [sumToIter_Xl, iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xr, iterToSum_C_X]
#align mv_polynomial.sum_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.sumRingEquiv
@[simps!]
def sumAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
{ sumRingEquiv R S₁ S₂ with
commutes' := by
intro r
have A : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R)) r = (C (C r) : _) := rfl
have B : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R) r = C r := rfl
simp only [sumRingEquiv, mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial, Equiv.toFun_as_coe,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, B, sumToIter_C, A] }
#align mv_polynomial.sum_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv
section
-- this speeds up typeclass search in the lemma below
attribute [local instance] IsScalarTower.right
@[simps!]
def optionEquivLeft : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial S₁ R) :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim Polynomial.X fun s => Polynomial.C (X s))
(Polynomial.aevalTower (MvPolynomial.rename some) (X none))
(by ext : 2 <;> simp) (by ext i : 2; cases i <;> simp)
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_left MvPolynomial.optionEquivLeft
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X (some x)) = Polynomial.C (X x) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_none : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X none) = Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_C (r : R) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (C r) = Polynomial.C (C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, Polynomial.algebraMap_apply, algebraMap_eq]
end
@[simps!]
def optionEquivRight : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ R[X] :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim (C Polynomial.X) X)
(MvPolynomial.aevalTower (Polynomial.aeval (X none)) fun i => X (Option.some i))
(by
ext : 2 <;>
simp only [MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq, Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.id_comp,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', comp_apply, aevalTower_C, Polynomial.aeval_X, aeval_X,
Option.elim', aevalTower_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff])
(by
ext ⟨i⟩ : 2 <;>
simp only [Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval_X, aevalTower_C,
Polynomial.aeval_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, aevalTower_X])
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_right MvPolynomial.optionEquivRight
lemma optionEquivRight_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X (some x)) = X x := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_X_none : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X none) = C Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_C (r : R) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (C r) = C (Polynomial.C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_C, algebraMap_apply, Polynomial.algebraMap_eq]
variable (n : ℕ)
def finSuccEquiv : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) :=
(renameEquiv R (_root_.finSuccEquiv n)).trans (optionEquivLeft R (Fin n))
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv
theorem finSuccEquiv_eq :
(finSuccEquiv R n : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R →+* Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) fun i : Fin (n + 1) =>
Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i := by
ext i : 2
· simp only [finSuccEquiv, optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, AlgEquiv.coe_trans, RingHom.coe_coe,
coe_eval₂Hom, comp_apply, renameEquiv_apply, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, rename_C]
rfl
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [finSuccEquiv]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_eq MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_eq
@[simp]
theorem finSuccEquiv_apply (p : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) :
finSuccEquiv R n p =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R))
(fun i : Fin (n + 1) => Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i) p := by
rw [← finSuccEquiv_eq, RingHom.coe_coe]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_apply MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply
theorem finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) :
(↑(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).symm : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) →+* _).comp
(Polynomial.C.comp MvPolynomial.C) =
(MvPolynomial.C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n.succ) R) := by
refine RingHom.ext fun x => ?_
rw [RingHom.comp_apply]
refine
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).injective
(Trans.trans ((MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).apply_symm_apply _) ?_)
simp only [MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply, MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_comp_C_eq_C MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C
variable {n} {R}
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_zero : finSuccEquiv R n (X 0) = Polynomial.X := by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_X_zero MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_X_zero
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_succ {j : Fin n} : finSuccEquiv R n (X j.succ) = Polynomial.C (X j) := by
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_X_succ MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_X_succ
theorem finSuccEquiv_coeff_coeff (m : Fin n →₀ ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) (i : ℕ) :
coeff m (Polynomial.coeff (finSuccEquiv R n f) i) = coeff (m.cons i) f := by
induction' f using MvPolynomial.induction_on' with j r p q hp hq generalizing i m
swap
· simp only [(finSuccEquiv R n).map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add, coeff_add, hp, hq]
simp only [finSuccEquiv_apply, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_monomial, RingHom.coe_comp, prod_pow,
Polynomial.coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_monomial, Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.cases_zero,
Fin.cases_succ, ← map_prod, ← RingHom.map_pow, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← mul_boole, mul_comm (Polynomial.X ^ j 0), Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow]; congr 1
obtain rfl | hjmi := eq_or_ne j (m.cons i)
· simpa only [cons_zero, cons_succ, if_pos rfl, monomial_eq, C_1, one_mul, prod_pow] using
coeff_monomial m m (1 : R)
· simp only [hjmi, if_false]
obtain hij | rfl := ne_or_eq i (j 0)
· simp only [hij, if_false, coeff_zero]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
have hmj : m ≠ j.tail := by
rintro rfl
rw [cons_tail] at hjmi
contradiction
simpa only [monomial_eq, C_1, one_mul, prod_pow, Finsupp.tail_apply, if_neg hmj.symm] using
coeff_monomial m j.tail (1 : R)
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_coeff_coeff MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_coeff_coeff
theorem eval_eq_eval_mv_eval' (s : Fin n → R) (y : R) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) :
eval (Fin.cons y s : Fin (n + 1) → R) f =
Polynomial.eval y (Polynomial.map (eval s) (finSuccEquiv R n f)) := by
-- turn this into a def `Polynomial.mapAlgHom`
let φ : (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.mapRingHom (eval s) with
commutes' := fun r => by
convert Polynomial.map_C (eval s)
exact (eval_C _).symm }
show
aeval (Fin.cons y s : Fin (n + 1) → R) f =
(Polynomial.aeval y).comp (φ.comp (finSuccEquiv R n).toAlgHom) f
congr 2
apply MvPolynomial.algHom_ext
rw [Fin.forall_fin_succ]
simp only [φ, aeval_X, Fin.cons_zero, AlgEquiv.toAlgHom_eq_coe, AlgHom.coe_comp,
Polynomial.coe_aeval_eq_eval, Polynomial.map_C, AlgHom.coe_mk, RingHom.toFun_eq_coe,
Polynomial.coe_mapRingHom, comp_apply, finSuccEquiv_apply, eval₂Hom_X',
Fin.cases_zero, Polynomial.map_X, Polynomial.eval_X, Fin.cons_succ,
Fin.cases_succ, eval_X, Polynomial.eval_C,
RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.coe_coe, AlgHom.coe_coe, implies_true, and_self,
RingHom.toMonoidHom_eq_coe]
#align mv_polynomial.eval_eq_eval_mv_eval' MvPolynomial.eval_eq_eval_mv_eval'
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Equiv.lean | 432 | 434 | theorem coeff_eval_eq_eval_coeff (s' : Fin n → R) (f : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R))
(i : ℕ) : Polynomial.coeff (Polynomial.map (eval s') f) i = eval s' (Polynomial.coeff f i) := by |
simp only [Polynomial.coeff_map]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.Asymptotics
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.specific_asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
open Filter Asymptotics
open Topology
section Real
open Finset
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/SpecificAsymptotics.lean | 98 | 128 | theorem Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sum_range {α : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α} {g : ℕ → ℝ}
(h : f =o[atTop] g) (hg : 0 ≤ g) (h'g : Tendsto (fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i) atTop atTop) :
(fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, f i) =o[atTop] fun n => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i := by |
have A : ∀ i, ‖g i‖ = g i := fun i => Real.norm_of_nonneg (hg i)
have B : ∀ n, ‖∑ i ∈ range n, g i‖ = ∑ i ∈ range n, g i := fun n => by
rwa [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_sum_of_nonneg']
apply isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε εpos => _
intro ε εpos
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ : ∃ N : ℕ, ∀ b : ℕ, N ≤ b → ‖f b‖ ≤ ε / 2 * g b := by
simpa only [A, eventually_atTop] using isLittleO_iff.mp h (half_pos εpos)
have : (fun _ : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range N, f i) =o[atTop] fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ range n, g i := by
apply isLittleO_const_left.2
exact Or.inr (h'g.congr fun n => (B n).symm)
filter_upwards [isLittleO_iff.1 this (half_pos εpos), Ici_mem_atTop N] with n hn Nn
calc
‖∑ i ∈ range n, f i‖ = ‖(∑ i ∈ range N, f i) + ∑ i ∈ Ico N n, f i‖ := by
rw [sum_range_add_sum_Ico _ Nn]
_ ≤ ‖∑ i ∈ range N, f i‖ + ‖∑ i ∈ Ico N n, f i‖ := norm_add_le _ _
_ ≤ ‖∑ i ∈ range N, f i‖ + ∑ i ∈ Ico N n, ε / 2 * g i :=
(add_le_add le_rfl (norm_sum_le_of_le _ fun i hi => hN _ (mem_Ico.1 hi).1))
_ ≤ ‖∑ i ∈ range N, f i‖ + ∑ i ∈ range n, ε / 2 * g i := by
gcongr
apply sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg
· rw [range_eq_Ico]
exact Ico_subset_Ico (zero_le _) le_rfl
· intro i _ _
exact mul_nonneg (half_pos εpos).le (hg i)
_ ≤ ε / 2 * ‖∑ i ∈ range n, g i‖ + ε / 2 * ∑ i ∈ range n, g i := by rw [← mul_sum]; gcongr
_ = ε * ‖∑ i ∈ range n, g i‖ := by
simp only [B]
ring
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Zip
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
#align_import data.list.rotate from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_mod List.rotate_mod
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_nil List.rotate_nil
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_zero List.rotate_zero
-- Porting note: removing simp, simp can prove it
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.rotate'_nil List.rotate'_nil
@[simp]
theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by cases l <;> rfl
#align list.rotate'_zero List.rotate'_zero
theorem rotate'_cons_succ (l : List α) (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
(a :: l : List α).rotate' n.succ = (l ++ [a]).rotate' n := by simp [rotate']
#align list.rotate'_cons_succ List.rotate'_cons_succ
@[simp]
theorem length_rotate' : ∀ (l : List α) (n : ℕ), (l.rotate' n).length = l.length
| [], _ => by simp
| a :: l, 0 => rfl
| a :: l, n + 1 => by rw [List.rotate', length_rotate' (l ++ [a]) n]; simp
#align list.length_rotate' List.length_rotate'
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 67 | 76 | theorem rotate'_eq_drop_append_take :
∀ {l : List α} {n : ℕ}, n ≤ l.length → l.rotate' n = l.drop n ++ l.take n
| [], n, h => by simp [drop_append_of_le_length h]
| l, 0, h => by simp [take_append_of_le_length h]
| a :: l, n + 1, h => by
have hnl : n ≤ l.length := le_of_succ_le_succ h
have hnl' : n ≤ (l ++ [a]).length := by |
rw [length_append, length_cons, List.length]; exact le_of_succ_le h
rw [rotate'_cons_succ, rotate'_eq_drop_append_take hnl', drop, take,
drop_append_of_le_length hnl, take_append_of_le_length hnl]; simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
#align_import linear_algebra.std_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"13bce9a6b6c44f6b4c91ac1c1d2a816e2533d395"
open Function Set Submodule
namespace LinearMap
variable (R : Type*) {ι : Type*} [Semiring R] (φ : ι → Type*) [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (φ i)]
[∀ i, Module R (φ i)] [DecidableEq ι]
def stdBasis : ∀ i : ι, φ i →ₗ[R] ∀ i, φ i :=
single
#align linear_map.std_basis LinearMap.stdBasis
theorem stdBasis_apply (i : ι) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b = update (0 : (a : ι) → φ a) i b :=
rfl
#align linear_map.std_basis_apply LinearMap.stdBasis_apply
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply' (i i' : ι) : (stdBasis R (fun _x : ι => R) i) 1 i' = ite (i = i') 1 0 := by
rw [LinearMap.stdBasis_apply, Function.update_apply, Pi.zero_apply]
congr 1; rw [eq_iff_iff, eq_comm]
#align linear_map.std_basis_apply' LinearMap.stdBasis_apply'
theorem coe_stdBasis (i : ι) : ⇑(stdBasis R φ i) = Pi.single i :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_std_basis LinearMap.coe_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_same (i : ι) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b i = b :=
Pi.single_eq_same i b
#align linear_map.std_basis_same LinearMap.stdBasis_same
theorem stdBasis_ne (i j : ι) (h : j ≠ i) (b : φ i) : stdBasis R φ i b j = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne h b
#align linear_map.std_basis_ne LinearMap.stdBasis_ne
theorem stdBasis_eq_pi_diag (i : ι) : stdBasis R φ i = pi (diag i) := by
ext x j
-- Porting note: made types explicit
convert (update_apply (R := R) (φ := φ) (ι := ι) 0 x i j _).symm
rfl
#align linear_map.std_basis_eq_pi_diag LinearMap.stdBasis_eq_pi_diag
theorem ker_stdBasis (i : ι) : ker (stdBasis R φ i) = ⊥ :=
ker_eq_bot_of_injective <| Pi.single_injective _ _
#align linear_map.ker_std_basis LinearMap.ker_stdBasis
theorem proj_comp_stdBasis (i j : ι) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ j) = diag j i := by
rw [stdBasis_eq_pi_diag, proj_pi]
#align linear_map.proj_comp_std_basis LinearMap.proj_comp_stdBasis
theorem proj_stdBasis_same (i : ι) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ i) = id :=
LinearMap.ext <| stdBasis_same R φ i
#align linear_map.proj_std_basis_same LinearMap.proj_stdBasis_same
theorem proj_stdBasis_ne (i j : ι) (h : i ≠ j) : (proj i).comp (stdBasis R φ j) = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext <| stdBasis_ne R φ _ _ h
#align linear_map.proj_std_basis_ne LinearMap.proj_stdBasis_ne
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/StdBasis.lean | 96 | 103 | theorem iSup_range_stdBasis_le_iInf_ker_proj (I J : Set ι) (h : Disjoint I J) :
⨆ i ∈ I, range (stdBasis R φ i) ≤ ⨅ i ∈ J, ker (proj i : (∀ i, φ i) →ₗ[R] φ i) := by |
refine iSup_le fun i => iSup_le fun hi => range_le_iff_comap.2 ?_
simp only [← ker_comp, eq_top_iff, SetLike.le_def, mem_ker, comap_iInf, mem_iInf]
rintro b - j hj
rw [proj_stdBasis_ne R φ j i, zero_apply]
rintro rfl
exact h.le_bot ⟨hi, hj⟩
|
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
#align_import order.symm_diff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6eb334bd8f3433d5b08ba156b8ec3e6af47e1904"
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
def symmDiff [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
#align symm_diff symmDiff
def bihimp [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
#align bihimp bihimp
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Sup α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_def symmDiff_def
theorem bihimp_def [Inf α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
#align bihimp_def bihimp_def
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
#align symm_diff_eq_xor symmDiff_eq_Xor'
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
(iff_iff_implies_and_implies _ _).symm.trans Iff.comm
#align bihimp_iff_iff bihimp_iff_iff
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
#align bool.symm_diff_eq_bxor Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
#align to_dual_symm_diff toDual_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
#align of_dual_bihimp ofDual_bihimp
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
#align symm_diff_comm symmDiff_comm
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
#align symm_diff_is_comm symmDiff_isCommutative
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
#align symm_diff_self symmDiff_self
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_bot symmDiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
#align bot_symm_diff bot_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
#align symm_diff_eq_bot symmDiff_eq_bot
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_le symmDiff_of_le
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
#align symm_diff_of_ge symmDiff_of_ge
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
#align symm_diff_le symmDiff_le
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align symm_diff_le_iff symmDiff_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
#align symm_diff_le_sup symmDiff_le_sup
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
#align symm_diff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
#align disjoint.symm_diff_eq_sup Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
#align symm_diff_sdiff symmDiff_sdiff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 170 | 172 | theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by |
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Exponential
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.fixed_point from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0dd4319a17376eda5763cd0a7e0d35bbaaa50e83"
noncomputable section
universe u v
open Function Order
namespace Ordinal
section
variable {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
def nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
sup (List.foldr f a)
#align ordinal.nfp_family Ordinal.nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_sup (f : ι → Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}) (a : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a = sup.{u, v} (List.foldr f a) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_sup Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_sup
theorem foldr_le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal)
(a l) : List.foldr f a l ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_family Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpFamily
theorem le_nfpFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) : a ≤ nfpFamily f a :=
le_sup _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_family Ordinal.le_nfpFamily
theorem lt_nfpFamily {a b} : a < nfpFamily.{u, v} f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr f b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_family Ordinal.lt_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_le_iff {a b} : nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_iff Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le {a b} : (∀ l, List.foldr f a l ≤ b) → nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le Ordinal.nfpFamily_le
theorem nfpFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) : Monotone (nfpFamily.{u, v} f) :=
fun _ _ h => sup_le.{u, v} fun l => (List.foldr_monotone hf l h).trans (le_sup.{u, v} _ l)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_monotone Ordinal.nfpFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) (i) :
f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_nfpFamily.1 hb
lt_sup.2 ⟨i::l, (H i).strictMono hl⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∀ i, f i b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b < nfpFamily.{u, v} f a :=
⟨fun h =>
lt_nfpFamily.2 <|
let ⟨l, hl⟩ := lt_sup.1 <| h <| Classical.arbitrary ι
⟨l, ((H _).self_le b).trans_lt hl⟩,
apply_lt_nfpFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_family_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff
theorem nfpFamily_le_apply [Nonempty ι] (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a b} :
(∃ i, nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ f i b) ↔ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff H
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_apply Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i, Monotone (f i)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ i, f i b ≤ b) :
nfpFamily.{u, v} f a ≤ b :=
sup_le fun l => by
by_cases hι : IsEmpty ι
· rwa [Unique.eq_default l]
· induction' l with i l IH generalizing a
· exact ab
exact (H i (IH ab)).trans (h i)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_le_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (a) :
f i (nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
unfold nfpFamily
rw [@IsNormal.sup.{u, v, v} _ H _ _ ⟨[]⟩]
apply le_antisymm <;> refine Ordinal.sup_le fun l => ?_
· exact le_sup _ (i::l)
· exact (H.self_le _).trans (le_sup _ _)
#align ordinal.nfp_family_fp Ordinal.nfpFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpFamily [hι : Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i))
{a b} : (∀ i, f i b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpFamily.{u, v} f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i => ?_⟩
· cases' hι with i
exact ((H i).self_le b).trans (h i)
rw [← nfpFamily_fp (H i)]
exact (H i).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_family Ordinal.apply_le_nfpFamily
theorem nfpFamily_eq_self {f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal} {a} (h : ∀ i, f i a = a) :
nfpFamily f a = a :=
le_antisymm (sup_le fun l => by rw [List.foldr_fixed' h l]) <| le_nfpFamily f a
#align ordinal.nfp_family_eq_self Ordinal.nfpFamily_eq_self
-- Todo: This is actually a special case of the fact the intersection of club sets is a club set.
theorem fp_family_unbounded (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
(⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpFamily.{u, v} f a, fun s ⟨i, hi⟩ => by
rw [← hi, mem_fixedPoints_iff]
exact nfpFamily_fp.{u, v} (H i) a, (le_nfpFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_family_unbounded Ordinal.fp_family_unbounded
def derivFamily (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
limitRecOn o (nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0) (fun _ IH => nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ IH))
fun a _ => bsup.{max u v, u} a
#align ordinal.deriv_family Ordinal.derivFamily
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_zero (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f 0 = nfpFamily.{u, v} f 0 :=
limitRecOn_zero _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_zero Ordinal.derivFamily_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivFamily_succ (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) (o) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f (succ o) = nfpFamily.{u, v} f (succ (derivFamily.{u, v} f o)) :=
limitRecOn_succ _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_succ Ordinal.derivFamily_succ
theorem derivFamily_limit (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) {o} :
IsLimit o → derivFamily.{u, v} f o = bsup.{max u v, u} o fun a _ => derivFamily.{u, v} f a :=
limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _
#align ordinal.deriv_family_limit Ordinal.derivFamily_limit
theorem derivFamily_isNormal (f : ι → Ordinal → Ordinal) : IsNormal (derivFamily f) :=
⟨fun o => by rw [derivFamily_succ, ← succ_le_iff]; apply le_nfpFamily, fun o l a => by
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, bsup_le_iff]⟩
#align ordinal.deriv_family_is_normal Ordinal.derivFamily_isNormal
theorem derivFamily_fp {i} (H : IsNormal (f i)) (o : Ordinal.{max u v}) :
f i (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) = derivFamily.{u, v} f o := by
induction' o using limitRecOn with o _ o l IH
· rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_fp H 0
· rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_fp H _
· rw [derivFamily_limit _ l,
IsNormal.bsup.{max u v, u, max u v} H (fun a _ => derivFamily f a) l.1]
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [bsup_le_iff, IH]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_fp Ordinal.derivFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
⟨fun ha => by
suffices ∀ (o) (_ : a ≤ derivFamily.{u, v} f o), ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a from
this a ((derivFamily_isNormal _).self_le _)
intro o
induction' o using limitRecOn with o IH o l IH
· intro h₁
refine ⟨0, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_zero]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (Ordinal.zero_le _) ha
· intro h₁
rcases le_or_lt a (derivFamily.{u, v} f o) with h | h
· exact IH h
refine ⟨succ o, le_antisymm ?_ h₁⟩
rw [derivFamily_succ]
exact nfpFamily_le_fp (fun i => (H i).monotone) (succ_le_of_lt h) ha
· intro h₁
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with h h
· exact ⟨_, h.symm⟩
rw [derivFamily_limit _ l, ← not_le, bsup_le_iff, not_forall₂] at h
exact
let ⟨o', h, hl⟩ := h
IH o' h (le_of_not_le hl),
fun ⟨o, e⟩ i => e ▸ (derivFamily_fp (H i) _).le⟩
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.le_iff_derivFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivFamily (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) {a} :
(∀ i, f i a = a) ↔ ∃ o, derivFamily.{u, v} f o = a :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h i => le_of_eq (h i), fun h i => (H i).le_iff_eq.1 (h i)⟩ (le_iff_derivFamily H)
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_family Ordinal.fp_iff_derivFamily
theorem derivFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i, IsNormal (f i)) :
derivFamily.{u, v} f = enumOrd (⋂ i, Function.fixedPoints (f i)) := by
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_family_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, fun a ha => ?_⟩
· rintro a S ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [← hi]
exact derivFamily_fp (H i) a
rw [Set.mem_iInter] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivFamily H]
#align ordinal.deriv_family_eq_enum_ord Ordinal.derivFamily_eq_enumOrd
end
section
variable {o : Ordinal.{u}} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal.{max u v} → Ordinal.{max u v}}
def nfpBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
nfpFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily Ordinal.nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f = nfpFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_nfp_family Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_nfpFamily
theorem foldr_le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal}
(f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a l) :
List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ _
#align ordinal.foldr_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.foldr_le_nfpBFamily
theorem le_nfpBFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) (a) :
a ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
le_sup.{u, v} _ []
#align ordinal.le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.le_nfpBFamily
theorem lt_nfpBFamily {a b} :
a < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f b ↔ ∃ l, a < List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) b l :=
lt_sup.{u, v}
#align ordinal.lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.lt_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b ↔ ∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b :=
sup_le_iff.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_iff Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le {o : Ordinal} {f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal} {a b} :
(∀ l, List.foldr (familyOfBFamily o f) a l ≤ b) → nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
sup_le.{u, v}
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le
theorem nfpBFamily_monotone (hf : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) : Monotone (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f) :=
nfpFamily_monotone fun _ => hf _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_monotone Ordinal.nfpBFamily_monotone
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} (hb : b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a)
(i hi) : f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply apply_lt_nfpFamily (fun _ => H _ _) hb
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily
theorem apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b < nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a :=
⟨fun h => by
haveI := out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
refine (apply_lt_nfpFamily_iff.{u, v} ?_).1 fun _ => h _ _
exact fun _ => H _ _, apply_lt_nfpBFamily H⟩
#align ordinal.apply_lt_nfp_bfamily_iff Ordinal.apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff
theorem nfpBFamily_le_apply (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∃ i hi, nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ f i hi b) ↔ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
push_neg
exact apply_lt_nfpBFamily_iff.{u, v} ho H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_apply Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_apply
theorem nfpBFamily_le_fp (H : ∀ i hi, Monotone (f i hi)) {a b} (ab : a ≤ b)
(h : ∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ b) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a ≤ b :=
nfpFamily_le_fp (fun _ => H _ _) ab fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_le_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_le_fp
theorem nfpBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a) :
f i hi (nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply nfpFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_fp Ordinal.nfpBFamily_fp
theorem apply_le_nfpBFamily (ho : o ≠ 0) (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a b} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a) ↔ b ≤ nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
· have ho' : 0 < o := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
exact ((H 0 ho').self_le b).trans (h 0 ho')
· rw [← nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi)]
exact (H i hi).monotone h
#align ordinal.apply_le_nfp_bfamily Ordinal.apply_le_nfpBFamily
theorem nfpBFamily_eq_self {a} (h : ∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) : nfpBFamily.{u, v} o f a = a :=
nfpFamily_eq_self fun _ => h _ _
#align ordinal.nfp_bfamily_eq_self Ordinal.nfpBFamily_eq_self
theorem fp_bfamily_unbounded (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
(⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)).Unbounded (· < ·) := fun a =>
⟨nfpBFamily.{u, v} _ f a, by
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂]
exact fun i hi => nfpBFamily_fp (H i hi) _, (le_nfpBFamily f a).not_lt⟩
#align ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded Ordinal.fp_bfamily_unbounded
def derivBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) : Ordinal → Ordinal :=
derivFamily (familyOfBFamily o f)
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily Ordinal.derivBFamily
theorem derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = derivFamily.{u, v} (familyOfBFamily o f) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_eq_deriv_family Ordinal.derivBFamily_eq_derivFamily
theorem derivBFamily_isNormal {o : Ordinal} (f : ∀ b < o, Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal (derivBFamily o f) :=
derivFamily_isNormal _
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_is_normal Ordinal.derivBFamily_isNormal
theorem derivBFamily_fp {i hi} (H : IsNormal (f i hi)) (a : Ordinal) :
f i hi (derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a) = derivBFamily.{u, v} o f a := by
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply derivFamily_fp
rw [familyOfBFamily_enum]
exact H
#align ordinal.deriv_bfamily_fp Ordinal.derivBFamily_fp
theorem le_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a ≤ a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
unfold derivBFamily
rw [← le_iff_derivFamily]
· refine ⟨fun h i => h _ _, fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← familyOfBFamily_enum o f]
apply h
· exact fun _ => H _ _
#align ordinal.le_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.le_iff_derivBFamily
theorem fp_iff_derivBFamily (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) {a} :
(∀ i hi, f i hi a = a) ↔ ∃ b, derivBFamily.{u, v} o f b = a := by
rw [← le_iff_derivBFamily H]
refine ⟨fun h i hi => le_of_eq (h i hi), fun h i hi => ?_⟩
rw [← (H i hi).le_iff_eq]
exact h i hi
#align ordinal.fp_iff_deriv_bfamily Ordinal.fp_iff_derivBFamily
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/FixedPoint.lean | 393 | 400 | theorem derivBFamily_eq_enumOrd (H : ∀ i hi, IsNormal (f i hi)) :
derivBFamily.{u, v} o f = enumOrd (⋂ (i) (hi), Function.fixedPoints (f i hi)) := by |
rw [← eq_enumOrd _ (fp_bfamily_unbounded.{u, v} H)]
use (derivBFamily_isNormal f).strictMono
rw [Set.range_eq_iff]
refine ⟨fun a => Set.mem_iInter₂.2 fun i hi => derivBFamily_fp (H i hi) a, fun a ha => ?_⟩
rw [Set.mem_iInter₂] at ha
rwa [← fp_iff_derivBFamily H]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
#align_import ring_theory.dedekind_domain.factorization from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f588be38bb5bec02f218ba14f82fc82eb663f87"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
Classical
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
#align is_dedekind_domain.height_one_spectrum.max_pow_dividing IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 68 | 76 | theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by |
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective ((HeightOneSpectrum.ext_iff (R := R) ↑v ↑w).mpr hvw)
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.dual from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"738c19f572805cff525a93aa4ffbdf232df05aa8"
open Matrix
section Transpose
variable {K V₁ V₂ ι₁ ι₂ : Type*} [Field K] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K V₁] [AddCommGroup V₂]
[Module K V₂] [Fintype ι₁] [Fintype ι₂] [DecidableEq ι₁] [DecidableEq ι₂] {B₁ : Basis ι₁ K V₁}
{B₂ : Basis ι₂ K V₂}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Dual.lean | 32 | 37 | theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_transpose (u : V₁ →ₗ[K] V₂) :
LinearMap.toMatrix B₂.dualBasis B₁.dualBasis (Module.Dual.transpose (R := K) u) =
(LinearMap.toMatrix B₁ B₂ u)ᵀ := by |
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Module.Dual.transpose_apply, B₁.dualBasis_repr,
B₂.dualBasis_apply, Matrix.transpose_apply, LinearMap.comp_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalities
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.WithLp
open Real Set Filter RCLike Bornology Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
variable (p : ℝ≥0∞) (𝕜 α β : Type*)
namespace WithLp
section DistNorm
section Norm
variable [Norm α] [Norm β]
open scoped Classical in
instance instProdNorm : Norm (WithLp p (α × β)) where
norm f :=
if _hp : p = 0 then
(if ‖f.fst‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if ‖f.snd‖ = 0 then 0 else 1)
else if p = ∞ then
‖f.fst‖ ⊔ ‖f.snd‖
else
(‖f.fst‖ ^ p.toReal + ‖f.snd‖ ^ p.toReal) ^ (1 / p.toReal)
variable {p α β}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/ProdLp.lean | 270 | 272 | theorem prod_norm_eq_card (f : WithLp 0 (α × β)) :
‖f‖ = (if ‖f.fst‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) + (if ‖f.snd‖ = 0 then 0 else 1) := by |
convert if_pos rfl
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetIntegral
#align_import measure_theory.integral.average from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c14c8fcde993801fca8946b0d80131a1a81d1520"
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[CompleteSpace E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
#align measure_theory.laverage MeasureTheory.laverage
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
#align measure_theory.laverage_zero MeasureTheory.laverage_zero
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
#align measure_theory.laverage_zero_measure MeasureTheory.laverage_zero_measure
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.laverage_eq' MeasureTheory.laverage_eq'
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
#align measure_theory.laverage_eq MeasureTheory.laverage_eq
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
#align measure_theory.laverage_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.laverage_eq_lintegral
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel' (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_laverage MeasureTheory.measure_mul_laverage
theorem setLaverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_laverage_eq MeasureTheory.setLaverage_eq
theorem setLaverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
#align measure_theory.set_laverage_eq' MeasureTheory.setLaverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
#align measure_theory.laverage_congr MeasureTheory.laverage_congr
theorem setLaverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLaverage_eq, set_lintegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
#align measure_theory.set_laverage_congr MeasureTheory.setLaverage_congr
theorem setLaverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, set_lintegral_congr_fun hs h]
#align measure_theory.set_laverage_congr_fun MeasureTheory.setLaverage_congr_fun
theorem laverage_lt_top (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∞ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq]
exact div_lt_top hf (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ)
#align measure_theory.laverage_lt_top MeasureTheory.laverage_lt_top
theorem setLaverage_lt_top : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞ → ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∞ :=
laverage_lt_top
#align measure_theory.set_laverage_lt_top MeasureTheory.setLaverage_lt_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 169 | 180 | theorem laverage_add_measure :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
μ univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ν univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂ν := by |
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ
simp [laverage_eq, hμ]
by_cases hν : IsFiniteMeasure ν; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hν
simp [laverage_eq, hν]
haveI := hμ; haveI := hν
simp only [← ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm, measure_mul_laverage, ← ENNReal.add_div,
← lintegral_add_measure, ← Measure.add_apply, ← laverage_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Map
#align_import linear_algebra.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9d684a893c52e1d6692a504a118bfccbae04feeb"
open Function
open Pointwise
variable {R : Type*} {R₁ : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {R₃ : Type*}
variable {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M₁ : Type*} {M₂ : Type*} {M₃ : Type*}
variable {V : Type*} {V₂ : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring R₂] [Semiring R₃]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {σ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {σ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃]
variable [Module R M] [Module R₂ M₂] [Module R₃ M₃]
open Submodule
variable {σ₂₁ : R₂ →+* R} {τ₁₂ : R →+* R₂} {τ₂₃ : R₂ →+* R₃} {τ₁₃ : R →+* R₃}
variable [RingHomCompTriple τ₁₂ τ₂₃ τ₁₃]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F τ₁₂ M M₂]
def ker (f : F) : Submodule R M :=
comap f ⊥
#align linear_map.ker LinearMap.ker
@[simp]
theorem mem_ker {f : F} {y} : y ∈ ker f ↔ f y = 0 :=
mem_bot R₂
#align linear_map.mem_ker LinearMap.mem_ker
@[simp]
theorem ker_id : ker (LinearMap.id : M →ₗ[R] M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align linear_map.ker_id LinearMap.ker_id
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_ker (f : F) (x : ker f) : f x = 0 :=
mem_ker.1 x.2
#align linear_map.map_coe_ker LinearMap.map_coe_ker
theorem ker_toAddSubmonoid (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : f.ker.toAddSubmonoid = (AddMonoidHom.mker f) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.ker_to_add_submonoid LinearMap.ker_toAddSubmonoid
theorem comp_ker_subtype (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) : f.comp f.ker.subtype = 0 :=
LinearMap.ext fun x => mem_ker.1 x.2
#align linear_map.comp_ker_subtype LinearMap.comp_ker_subtype
theorem ker_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) :
ker (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) = comap f (ker g) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.ker_comp LinearMap.ker_comp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/Ker.lean | 92 | 93 | theorem ker_le_ker_comp (f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₂] M₂) (g : M₂ →ₛₗ[τ₂₃] M₃) :
ker f ≤ ker (g.comp f : M →ₛₗ[τ₁₃] M₃) := by | rw [ker_comp]; exact comap_mono bot_le
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
#align real.zero_rpow Real.zero_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
#align real.zero_rpow_eq_iff Real.zero_rpow_eq_iff
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
#align real.eq_zero_rpow_iff Real.eq_zero_rpow_iff
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_one Real.rpow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.one_rpow Real.one_rpow
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_le_one Real.zero_rpow_le_one
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
#align real.zero_rpow_nonneg Real.zero_rpow_nonneg
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
#align real.rpow_nonneg_of_nonneg Real.rpow_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
#align real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg Real.abs_rpow_of_nonneg
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
#align real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow Real.abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
#align real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul Real.abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
#align real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
#align real.rpow_add Real.rpow_add
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
#align real.rpow_add' Real.rpow_add'
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
#align real.rpow_add_of_nonneg Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 227 | 237 | theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by |
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Set
#align_import data.set.intervals.order_iso from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
open Set
namespace OrderIso
section Preorder
variable {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iic b = Iic (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.preimage_Iic OrderIso.preimage_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ici b = Ici (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.le_iff_le]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ici OrderIso.preimage_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Iio b = Iio (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
#align order_iso.preimage_Iio OrderIso.preimage_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi (e : α ≃o β) (b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioi b = Ioi (e.symm b) := by
ext x
simp [← e.lt_iff_lt]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ioi OrderIso.preimage_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iic]
#align order_iso.preimage_Icc OrderIso.preimage_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ico OrderIso.preimage_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic]
#align order_iso.preimage_Ioc OrderIso.preimage_Ioc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/OrderIso.lean | 63 | 64 | theorem preimage_Ioo (e : α ≃o β) (a b : β) : e ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (e.symm a) (e.symm b) := by |
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Metric
section Cthickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ ε : ℝ} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
def cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ }
#align metric.cthickening Metric.cthickening
@[simp]
theorem mem_cthickening_iff : x ∈ cthickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
#align metric.mem_cthickening_iff Metric.mem_cthickening_iff
lemma eventually_not_mem_cthickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.cthickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [cthickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_le]
exact ((ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos).mpr hδ).trans ε_lt
theorem mem_cthickening_of_edist_le (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (h : y ∈ E)
(h' : edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E :=
(infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h).trans h'
#align metric.mem_cthickening_of_edist_le Metric.mem_cthickening_of_edist_le
theorem mem_cthickening_of_dist_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α)
(h : y ∈ E) (h' : dist x y ≤ δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E := by
apply mem_cthickening_of_edist_le x y δ E h
rw [edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal h'
#align metric.mem_cthickening_of_dist_le Metric.mem_cthickening_of_dist_le
theorem cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ E = (fun x => infEdist x E) ⁻¹' Iic (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
#align metric.cthickening_eq_preimage_inf_edist Metric.cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist
theorem isClosed_cthickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsClosed (cthickening δ E) :=
IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Iic
#align metric.is_closed_cthickening Metric.isClosed_cthickening
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : cthickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, top_le_iff]
#align metric.cthickening_empty Metric.cthickening_empty
theorem cthickening_of_nonpos {δ : ℝ} (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (E : Set α) : cthickening δ E = closure E := by
ext x
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 hδ]
#align metric.cthickening_of_nonpos Metric.cthickening_of_nonpos
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_zero (E : Set α) : cthickening 0 E = closure E :=
cthickening_of_nonpos le_rfl E
#align metric.cthickening_zero Metric.cthickening_zero
theorem cthickening_max_zero (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : cthickening (max 0 δ) E = cthickening δ E := by
cases le_total δ 0 <;> simp [cthickening_of_nonpos, *]
#align metric.cthickening_max_zero Metric.cthickening_max_zero
theorem cthickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ₁ E ⊆ cthickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.mpr (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
#align metric.cthickening_mono Metric.cthickening_mono
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 265 | 268 | theorem cthickening_singleton {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x : α) {δ : ℝ} (hδ : 0 ≤ δ) :
cthickening δ ({x} : Set α) = closedBall x δ := by |
ext y
simp [cthickening, edist_dist, ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Center
#align_import group_theory.subsemigroup.centralizer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cc67cd75b4e54191e13c2e8d722289a89e67e4fa"
variable {M : Type*} {S T : Set M}
namespace Set
variable (S)
@[to_additive addCentralizer " The centralizer of a subset of an additive magma. "]
def centralizer [Mul M] : Set M :=
{ c | ∀ m ∈ S, m * c = c * m }
#align set.centralizer Set.centralizer
#align set.add_centralizer Set.addCentralizer
variable {S}
@[to_additive mem_addCentralizer]
theorem mem_centralizer_iff [Mul M] {c : M} : c ∈ centralizer S ↔ ∀ m ∈ S, m * c = c * m :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_centralizer_iff Set.mem_centralizer_iff
#align set.mem_add_centralizer Set.mem_addCentralizer
@[to_additive decidableMemAddCentralizer]
instance decidableMemCentralizer [Mul M] [∀ a : M, Decidable <| ∀ b ∈ S, b * a = a * b] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ centralizer S) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ mem_centralizer_iff
#align set.decidable_mem_centralizer Set.decidableMemCentralizer
#align set.decidable_mem_add_centralizer Set.decidableMemAddCentralizer
variable (S)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_mem_addCentralizer]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Centralizer.lean | 58 | 59 | theorem one_mem_centralizer [MulOneClass M] : (1 : M) ∈ centralizer S := by |
simp [mem_centralizer_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_neg Orientation.oangle_neg_neg
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.oangle_neg_self_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
#align orientation.oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.oangle_neg_self_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, add_left_neg]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_self]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
#align orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg Orientation.oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_same_ray_neg Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
#align orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul Orientation.oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
#align orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linear_independent Orientation.oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, _root_.abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq Orientation.eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
#align orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero Orientation.eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
convert Complex.arg_real_mul _ (_ : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2) using 2
· norm_cast
· have : 0 < ‖y‖ := by simpa using hy
positivity
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
#align orientation.oangle_add Orientation.oangle_add
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_swap Orientation.oangle_add_swap
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_left Orientation.oangle_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_right Orientation.oangle_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3 Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
#align orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right Orientation.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
#align orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
#align orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq Orientation.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
#align orientation.oangle_map Orientation.oangle_map
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by simp [oangle]
#align complex.oangle Complex.oangle
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align orientation.oangle_map_complex Orientation.oangle_map_complex
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 616 | 617 | theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by |
simp [oangle]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
#align_import topology.algebra.order.intermediate_value from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
open Filter OrderDual TopologicalSpace Function Set
open Topology Filter
universe u v w
section
variable {X : Type u} {α : Type v} [TopologicalSpace X] [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OrderClosedTopology α]
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a b : X} {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (hb : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x, f x = g x := by
obtain ⟨x, _, hfg, hgf⟩ : (univ ∩ { x | f x ≤ g x ∧ g x ≤ f x }).Nonempty :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.1 PreconnectedSpace.isPreconnected_univ _ _ (isClosed_le hf hg)
(isClosed_le hg hf) (fun _ _ => le_total _ _) ⟨a, trivial, ha⟩ ⟨b, trivial, hb⟩
exact ⟨x, le_antisymm hfg hgf⟩
#align intermediate_value_univ₂ intermediate_value_univ₂
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ [PreconnectedSpace X] {a : X} {l : Filter X} [NeBot l]
{f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (ha : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) :
∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h⟩ := he.exists; intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg ha h
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁
theorem intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ [PreconnectedSpace X] {l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁]
[NeBot l₂] {f g : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g)
(he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) : ∃ x, f x = g x :=
let ⟨_, h₁⟩ := he₁.exists
let ⟨_, h₂⟩ := he₂.exists
intermediate_value_univ₂ hf hg h₁ h₂
#align intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X}
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s)
(ha' : f a ≤ g a) (hb' : g b ≤ f b) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂ s α _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩ _ _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf) (continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hg) ha'
hb'
⟨x, x.2, hx⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hg : ContinuousOn g s) (ha' : f a ≤ g a) (he : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₁ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) ⟨a, ha⟩ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl) _ _ hf hg ha' (he.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s)
{l₁ l₂ : Filter X} [NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f g : X → α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (he₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l₁] g) (he₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l₂] f) :
∃ x ∈ s, f x = g x := by
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict] at hf hg
obtain ⟨b, h⟩ :=
@intermediate_value_univ₂_eventually₂ _ _ _ _ _ _ (Subtype.preconnectedSpace hs) _ _
(comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₁) (comap_coe_neBot_of_le_principal hl₂) _ _ hf hg
(he₁.comap _) (he₂.comap _)
exact ⟨b, b.prop, h⟩
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ IsPreconnected.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : X} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' s := fun _x hx =>
hs.intermediate_value₂ ha hb hf continuousOn_const hx.1 hx.2
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value IsPreconnected.intermediate_value
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ico (f a) v ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h.1
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ico IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) {v : α}
(ht : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : Ioc v (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h.2
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht)).imp fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v₁ v₂ : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v₁)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v₂)) :
Ioo v₁ v₂ ⊆ f '' s := fun _ h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h.1 ht₁) (eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h.2 ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atTop) : Ici (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl hf continuousOn_const h (tendsto_atTop.1 ht y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ici IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ici
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a : X}
{l : Filter X} (ha : a ∈ s) [NeBot l] (hl : l ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht : Tendsto f l atBot) : Iic (f a) ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
(hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₁ ha hl continuousOn_const hf h (tendsto_atBot.1 ht y)).imp
fun _ h => h.imp_right Eq.symm
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iic IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iic
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ (𝓝 v)) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : Ioi v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const
(eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt h ht₁) (tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioi
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
{v : α} (ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ (𝓝 v)) : Iio v ⊆ f '' s := fun y h =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt h ht₂)
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iio IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iio
theorem IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii {s : Set X} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {l₁ l₂ : Filter X}
[NeBot l₁] [NeBot l₂] (hl₁ : l₁ ≤ 𝓟 s) (hl₂ : l₂ ≤ 𝓟 s) {f : X → α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(ht₁ : Tendsto f l₁ atBot) (ht₂ : Tendsto f l₂ atTop) : univ ⊆ f '' s := fun y _ =>
hs.intermediate_value₂_eventually₂ hl₁ hl₂ hf continuousOn_const (tendsto_atBot.1 ht₁ y)
(tendsto_atTop.1 ht₂ y)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_preconnected.intermediate_value_Iii IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Iii
theorem intermediate_value_univ [PreconnectedSpace X] (a b : X) {f : X → α} (hf : Continuous f) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ range f := fun _ hx => intermediate_value_univ₂ hf continuous_const hx.1 hx.2
#align intermediate_value_univ intermediate_value_univ
theorem mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge [PreconnectedSpace X] {c : α} {f : X → α}
(hf : Continuous f) (h₁ : ∃ a, f a ≤ c) (h₂ : ∃ b, c ≤ f b) : c ∈ range f :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := h₁; let ⟨b, hb⟩ := h₂; intermediate_value_univ a b hf ⟨ha, hb⟩
#align mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge
theorem IsPreconnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
simpa only [image_id] using hs.intermediate_value ha hb continuousOn_id
#align is_preconnected.Icc_subset IsPreconnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.ordConnected {s : Set α} (h : IsPreconnected s) : OrdConnected s :=
⟨fun _ hx _ hy => h.Icc_subset hx hy⟩
#align is_preconnected.ord_connected IsPreconnected.ordConnected
theorem IsConnected.Icc_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s)
(hb : b ∈ s) : Icc a b ⊆ s :=
hs.2.Icc_subset ha hb
#align is_connected.Icc_subset IsConnected.Icc_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : s = univ := by
refine eq_univ_of_forall fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := not_bddBelow_iff.1 hb x
obtain ⟨z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
exact hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨le_of_lt hy, le_of_lt hz⟩
#align is_preconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded IsPreconnected.eq_univ_of_unbounded
end
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] [Nonempty γ]
theorem IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsConnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s) ⊆ s := fun _x hx =>
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf hs.nonempty hb)).1 hx.1
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff (isLUB_csSup hs.nonempty ha)).1 hx.2
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_connected.Ioo_cInf_cSup_subset IsConnected.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset
theorem eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed {s : Set α} (hc : IsConnected s)
(hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (hcl : IsClosed s) : s = Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
(subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha).antisymm <|
hc.Icc_subset (hcl.csInf_mem hc.nonempty hb) (hcl.csSup_mem hc.nonempty ha)
#align eq_Icc_cInf_cSup_of_connected_bdd_closed eq_Icc_csInf_csSup_of_connected_bdd_closed
theorem IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : BddBelow s)
(ha : ¬BddAbove s) : Ioi (sInf s) ⊆ s := fun x hx =>
have sne : s.Nonempty := nonempty_of_not_bddAbove ha
let ⟨_y, ys, hy⟩ : ∃ y ∈ s, y < x := (isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_csInf sne hb)).1 hx
let ⟨_z, zs, hz⟩ : ∃ z ∈ s, x < z := not_bddAbove_iff.1 ha x
hs.Icc_subset ys zs ⟨hy.le, hz.le⟩
#align is_preconnected.Ioi_cInf_subset IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) (hb : ¬BddBelow s)
(ha : BddAbove s) : Iio (sSup s) ⊆ s :=
IsPreconnected.Ioi_csInf_subset (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ha hb
#align is_preconnected.Iio_cSup_subset IsPreconnected.Iio_csSup_subset
theorem IsPreconnected.mem_intervals {s : Set α} (hs : IsPreconnected s) :
s ∈
({Icc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ico (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioc (sInf s) (sSup s), Ioo (sInf s) (sSup s),
Ici (sInf s), Ioi (sInf s), Iic (sSup s), Iio (sSup s), univ, ∅} : Set (Set α)) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· apply_rules [Or.inr, mem_singleton]
have hs' : IsConnected s := ⟨hne, hs⟩
by_cases hb : BddBelow s <;> by_cases ha : BddAbove s
· refine mem_of_subset_of_mem ?_ <| mem_Icc_Ico_Ioc_Ioo_of_subset_of_subset
(hs'.Ioo_csInf_csSup_subset hb ha) (subset_Icc_csInf_csSup hb ha)
simp only [insert_subset_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, true_or, or_true,
singleton_subset_iff, and_self]
· refine Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr <| Or.inr ?_
cases'
mem_Ici_Ioi_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Ioi_csInf_subset hb ha) fun x hx => csInf_le hb hx with
hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 6 apply Or.inr
cases' mem_Iic_Iio_of_subset_of_subset (hs.Iio_csSup_subset hb ha) fun x hx => le_csSup ha hx
with hs hs
· exact Or.inl hs
· exact Or.inr (Or.inl hs)
· iterate 8 apply Or.inr
exact Or.inl (hs.eq_univ_of_unbounded hb ha)
#align is_preconnected.mem_intervals IsPreconnected.mem_intervals
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } ⊆
-- bounded intervals
(range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo)) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
intro s hs
rcases hs.mem_intervals with (hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs | hs) <;> rw [hs] <;>
simp only [union_insert, union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_union, mem_range, Prod.exists,
uncurry_apply_pair, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or, or_true, exists_apply_eq_apply2]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_subset_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hab : a ≤ b) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, (s ∩ Ioc x b).Nonempty) : b ∈ s := by
let S := s ∩ Icc a b
replace ha : a ∈ S := ⟨ha, left_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
have Sbd : BddAbove S := ⟨b, fun z hz => hz.2.2⟩
let c := sSup (s ∩ Icc a b)
have c_mem : c ∈ S := hs.csSup_mem ⟨_, ha⟩ Sbd
have c_le : c ≤ b := csSup_le ⟨_, ha⟩ fun x hx => hx.2.2
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le c_le with hc hc
· exact hc ▸ c_mem.1
exfalso
rcases hgt c ⟨c_mem.1, c_mem.2.1, hc⟩ with ⟨x, xs, cx, xb⟩
exact not_lt_of_le (le_csSup Sbd ⟨xs, le_trans (le_csSup Sbd ha) (le_of_lt cx), xb⟩) cx
#align is_closed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt {a b : α} {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b))
(ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, ∀ y ∈ Ioi x, (s ∩ Ioc x y).Nonempty) : Icc a b ⊆ s := by
intro y hy
have : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a y) := by
suffices s ∩ Icc a y = s ∩ Icc a b ∩ Icc a y by
rw [this]
exact IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc
rw [inter_assoc]
congr
exact (inter_eq_self_of_subset_right <| Icc_subset_Icc_right hy.2).symm
exact
IsClosed.mem_of_ge_of_forall_exists_gt this ha hy.1 fun x hx =>
hgt x ⟨hx.1, Ico_subset_Ico_right hy.2 hx.2⟩ y hx.2.2
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt
variable [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
theorem IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin {a b : α} {s : Set α}
(hs : IsClosed (s ∩ Icc a b)) (ha : a ∈ s) (hgt : ∀ x ∈ s ∩ Ico a b, s ∈ 𝓝[>] x) :
Icc a b ⊆ s := by
apply hs.Icc_subset_of_forall_exists_gt ha
rintro x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩ y hyxb
have : s ∩ Ioc x y ∈ 𝓝[>] x :=
inter_mem (hgt x ⟨hxs, hxab⟩) (Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi ⟨le_rfl, hyxb⟩)
exact (nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨b, hxab.2⟩).nonempty_of_mem this
#align is_closed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhds_within IsClosed.Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem isPreconnected_Icc_aux (x y : α) (s t : Set α) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hs : IsClosed s)
(ht : IsClosed t) (hab : Icc a b ⊆ s ∪ t) (hx : x ∈ Icc a b ∩ s) (hy : y ∈ Icc a b ∩ t) :
(Icc a b ∩ (s ∩ t)).Nonempty := by
have xyab : Icc x y ⊆ Icc a b := Icc_subset_Icc hx.1.1 hy.1.2
by_contra hst
suffices Icc x y ⊆ s from
hst ⟨y, xyab <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, this <| right_mem_Icc.2 hxy, hy.2⟩
apply (IsClosed.inter hs isClosed_Icc).Icc_subset_of_forall_mem_nhdsWithin hx.2
rintro z ⟨zs, hz⟩
have zt : z ∈ tᶜ := fun zt => hst ⟨z, xyab <| Ico_subset_Icc_self hz, zs, zt⟩
have : tᶜ ∩ Ioc z y ∈ 𝓝[>] z := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi hz.2]
exact mem_nhdsWithin.2 ⟨tᶜ, ht.isOpen_compl, zt, Subset.rfl⟩
apply mem_of_superset this
have : Ioc z y ⊆ s ∪ t := fun w hw => hab (xyab ⟨le_trans hz.1 (le_of_lt hw.1), hw.2⟩)
exact fun w ⟨wt, wzy⟩ => (this wzy).elim id fun h => (wt h).elim
#align is_preconnected_Icc_aux isPreconnected_Icc_aux
theorem isPreconnected_Icc : IsPreconnected (Icc a b) :=
isPreconnected_closed_iff.2
(by
rintro s t hs ht hab ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩
-- This used to use `wlog`, but it was causing timeouts.
rcases le_total x y with h | h
· exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux x y s t h hs ht hab hx hy
· rw [inter_comm s t]
rw [union_comm s t] at hab
exact isPreconnected_Icc_aux y x t s h ht hs hab hy hx)
#align is_preconnected_Icc isPreconnected_Icc
theorem isPreconnected_uIcc : IsPreconnected (uIcc a b) :=
isPreconnected_Icc
#align is_preconnected_uIcc isPreconnected_uIcc
theorem Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : s.OrdConnected) : IsPreconnected s :=
isPreconnected_of_forall_pair fun x hx y hy =>
⟨uIcc x y, h.uIcc_subset hx hy, left_mem_uIcc, right_mem_uIcc, isPreconnected_uIcc⟩
#align set.ord_connected.is_preconnected Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected
theorem isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected {s : Set α} : IsPreconnected s ↔ OrdConnected s :=
⟨IsPreconnected.ordConnected, Set.OrdConnected.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_preconnected_iff_ord_connected isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected
theorem isPreconnected_Ici : IsPreconnected (Ici a) :=
ordConnected_Ici.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ici isPreconnected_Ici
theorem isPreconnected_Iic : IsPreconnected (Iic a) :=
ordConnected_Iic.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iic isPreconnected_Iic
theorem isPreconnected_Iio : IsPreconnected (Iio a) :=
ordConnected_Iio.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Iio isPreconnected_Iio
theorem isPreconnected_Ioi : IsPreconnected (Ioi a) :=
ordConnected_Ioi.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioi isPreconnected_Ioi
theorem isPreconnected_Ioo : IsPreconnected (Ioo a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioo.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioo isPreconnected_Ioo
theorem isPreconnected_Ioc : IsPreconnected (Ioc a b) :=
ordConnected_Ioc.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ioc isPreconnected_Ioc
theorem isPreconnected_Ico : IsPreconnected (Ico a b) :=
ordConnected_Ico.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_Ico isPreconnected_Ico
theorem isConnected_Ici : IsConnected (Ici a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ici, isPreconnected_Ici⟩
#align is_connected_Ici isConnected_Ici
theorem isConnected_Iic : IsConnected (Iic a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iic, isPreconnected_Iic⟩
#align is_connected_Iic isConnected_Iic
theorem isConnected_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : IsConnected (Ioi a) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioi, isPreconnected_Ioi⟩
#align is_connected_Ioi isConnected_Ioi
theorem isConnected_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : IsConnected (Iio a) :=
⟨nonempty_Iio, isPreconnected_Iio⟩
#align is_connected_Iio isConnected_Iio
theorem isConnected_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsConnected (Icc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Icc.2 h, isPreconnected_Icc⟩
#align is_connected_Icc isConnected_Icc
theorem isConnected_Ioo (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioo a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioo.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioo⟩
#align is_connected_Ioo isConnected_Ioo
theorem isConnected_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ioc a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ioc.2 h, isPreconnected_Ioc⟩
#align is_connected_Ioc isConnected_Ioc
theorem isConnected_Ico (h : a < b) : IsConnected (Ico a b) :=
⟨nonempty_Ico.2 h, isPreconnected_Ico⟩
#align is_connected_Ico isConnected_Ico
instance (priority := 100) ordered_connected_space : PreconnectedSpace α :=
⟨ordConnected_univ.isPreconnected⟩
#align ordered_connected_space ordered_connected_space
theorem setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered :
{ s : Set α | IsPreconnected s } =
-- bounded intervals
range (uncurry Icc) ∪ range (uncurry Ico) ∪ range (uncurry Ioc) ∪ range (uncurry Ioo) ∪
-- unbounded intervals and `univ`
(range Ici ∪ range Ioi ∪ range Iic ∪ range Iio ∪ {univ, ∅}) := by
refine Subset.antisymm setOf_isPreconnected_subset_of_ordered ?_
simp only [subset_def, forall_mem_range, uncurry, or_imp, forall_and, mem_union,
mem_setOf_eq, insert_eq, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq, forall_true_iff, and_true_iff,
isPreconnected_Icc, isPreconnected_Ico, isPreconnected_Ioc, isPreconnected_Ioo,
isPreconnected_Ioi, isPreconnected_Iio, isPreconnected_Ici, isPreconnected_Iic,
isPreconnected_univ, isPreconnected_empty]
#align set_of_is_preconnected_eq_of_ordered setOf_isPreconnected_eq_of_ordered
lemma isTotallyDisconnected_iff_lt {s : Set α} :
IsTotallyDisconnected s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x < y → ∃ z ∉ s, z ∈ Ioo x y := by
simp only [IsTotallyDisconnected, isPreconnected_iff_ordConnected, ← not_nontrivial_iff,
nontrivial_iff_exists_lt, not_exists, not_and]
refine ⟨fun h x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_, fun h t hts ht x hx y hy hxy ↦ ?_⟩
· simp_rw [← not_ordConnected_inter_Icc_iff hx hy]
exact fun hs ↦ h _ inter_subset_left hs _ ⟨hx, le_rfl, hxy.le⟩ _ ⟨hy, hxy.le, le_rfl⟩ hxy
· obtain ⟨z, h1z, h2z⟩ := h x (hts hx) y (hts hy) hxy
exact h1z <| hts <| ht.1 hx hy ⟨h2z.1.le, h2z.2.le⟩
variable {δ : Type*} [LinearOrder δ] [TopologicalSpace δ] [OrderClosedTopology δ]
theorem intermediate_value_Icc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Icc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc intermediate_value_Icc
theorem intermediate_value_Icc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Icc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Icc a b :=
isPreconnected_Icc.intermediate_value (right_mem_Icc.2 hab) (left_mem_Icc.2 hab) hf
#align intermediate_value_Icc' intermediate_value_Icc'
theorem intermediate_value_uIcc {a b : α} {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (uIcc a b)) :
uIcc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' uIcc a b := by
cases le_total (f a) (f b) <;> simp [*, isPreconnected_uIcc.intermediate_value]
#align intermediate_value_uIcc intermediate_value_uIcc
theorem intermediate_value_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ico (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico intermediate_value_Ico
theorem intermediate_value_Ico' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioc (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ico a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_le (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ico _ _ ⟨refl a, hlt⟩
(right_nhdsWithin_Ico_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ico_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ico' intermediate_value_Ico'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioc (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioc _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc intermediate_value_Ioc
theorem intermediate_value_Ioc' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ico (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioc a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_le_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ico _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioc _ _ ⟨hlt, refl b⟩
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioc_neBot hlt) inf_le_right _ (hf.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self) _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioc' intermediate_value_Ioc'
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ} (hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) :
Ioo (f a) (f b) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.2 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.1))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo intermediate_value_Ioo
theorem intermediate_value_Ioo' {a b : α} (hab : a ≤ b) {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) : Ioo (f b) (f a) ⊆ f '' Ioo a b :=
Or.elim (eq_or_lt_of_le hab) (fun he _ h => absurd h.1 (not_lt_of_lt (he ▸ h.2))) fun hlt =>
@IsPreconnected.intermediate_value_Ioo _ _ _ _ _ _ _ isPreconnected_Ioo _ _
(right_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) (left_nhdsWithin_Ioo_neBot hlt) inf_le_right inf_le_right _
(hf.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self) _ _
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨hab, refl b⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
((hf.continuousWithinAt ⟨refl a, hab⟩).mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self)
#align intermediate_value_Ioo' intermediate_value_Ioo'
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : SurjOn f s (Icc (f a) (f b)) :=
hs.isPreconnected.intermediate_value ha hb hf
#align continuous_on.surj_on_Icc ContinuousOn.surjOn_Icc
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_uIcc {s : Set α} [hs : OrdConnected s] {f : α → δ}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) {a b : α} (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) :
SurjOn f s (uIcc (f a) (f b)) := by
rcases le_total (f a) (f b) with hab | hab <;> simp [hf.surjOn_Icc, *]
#align continuous_on.surj_on_uIcc ContinuousOn.surjOn_uIcc
theorem Continuous.surjective {f : α → δ} (hf : Continuous f) (h_top : Tendsto f atTop atTop)
(h_bot : Tendsto f atBot atBot) : Function.Surjective f := fun p =>
mem_range_of_exists_le_of_exists_ge hf (h_bot.eventually (eventually_le_atBot p)).exists
(h_top.eventually (eventually_ge_atTop p)).exists
#align continuous.surjective Continuous.surjective
theorem Continuous.surjective' {f : α → δ} (hf : Continuous f) (h_top : Tendsto f atBot atTop)
(h_bot : Tendsto f atTop atBot) : Function.Surjective f :=
Continuous.surjective (α := αᵒᵈ) hf h_top h_bot
#align continuous.surjective' Continuous.surjective'
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto {f : α → δ} {s : Set α} [OrdConnected s] (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hbot : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atBot atBot)
(htop : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atTop atTop) : SurjOn f s univ :=
haveI := Classical.inhabited_of_nonempty hs.to_subtype
surjOn_iff_surjective.2 <| hf.restrict.surjective htop hbot
#align continuous_on.surj_on_of_tendsto ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto
theorem ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto' {f : α → δ} {s : Set α} [OrdConnected s] (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hbot : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atBot atTop)
(htop : Tendsto (fun x : s => f x) atTop atBot) : SurjOn f s univ :=
ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto (δ := δᵒᵈ) hs hf hbot htop
#align continuous_on.surj_on_of_tendsto' ContinuousOn.surjOn_of_tendsto'
theorem Continuous.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder [BoundedOrder α] {f : α → δ}
(hf_c : Continuous f) (hf : f ⊥ ≤ f ⊤) (hf_i : Injective f) : StrictMono f := by
intro a b hab
by_contra! h
have H : f b < f a := lt_of_le_of_ne h <| hf_i.ne hab.ne'
by_cases ha : f a ≤ f ⊥
· obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioc le_top hf_c.continuousOn ⟨H.trans_le ha, hf⟩
have : u = ⊥ := hf_i hu.2
aesop
· by_cases hb : f ⊥ < f b
· obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioo bot_le hf_c.continuousOn ⟨hb, H⟩
rw [hf_i hu.2] at hu
exact (hab.trans hu.1.2).false
· push_neg at ha hb
replace hb : f b < f ⊥ := lt_of_le_of_ne hb <| hf_i.ne (lt_of_lt_of_le' hab bot_le).ne'
obtain ⟨u, hu⟩ := intermediate_value_Ioo' hab.le hf_c.continuousOn ⟨hb, ha⟩
have : u = ⊥ := hf_i hu.2
aesop
theorem Continuous.strictAnti_of_inj_boundedOrder [BoundedOrder α] {f : α → δ}
(hf_c : Continuous f) (hf : f ⊤ ≤ f ⊥) (hf_i : Injective f) : StrictAnti f :=
hf_c.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder (δ := δᵒᵈ) hf hf_i
theorem Continuous.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder' [BoundedOrder α] {f : α → δ}
(hf_c : Continuous f) (hf_i : Injective f) : StrictMono f ∨ StrictAnti f :=
(le_total (f ⊥) (f ⊤)).imp
(hf_c.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder · hf_i)
(hf_c.strictAnti_of_inj_boundedOrder · hf_i)
theorem Continuous.strictMonoOn_of_inj_rigidity {f : α → δ}
(hf_c : Continuous f) (hf_i : Injective f) {a b : α} (hab : a < b)
(hf_mono : StrictMonoOn f (Icc a b)) : StrictMono f := by
intro x y hxy
let s := min a x
let t := max b y
have hsa : s ≤ a := min_le_left a x
have hbt : b ≤ t := le_max_left b y
have hst : s ≤ t := hsa.trans $ hbt.trans' hab.le
have hf_mono_st : StrictMonoOn f (Icc s t) ∨ StrictAntiOn f (Icc s t) := by
letI := Icc.completeLinearOrder hst
have := Continuous.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder' (f := Set.restrict (Icc s t) f)
hf_c.continuousOn.restrict hf_i.injOn.injective
exact this.imp strictMono_restrict.mp strictAntiOn_iff_strictAnti.mpr
have (h : StrictAntiOn f (Icc s t)) : False := by
have : Icc a b ⊆ Icc s t := Icc_subset_Icc hsa hbt
replace : StrictAntiOn f (Icc a b) := StrictAntiOn.mono h this
replace : IsAntichain (· ≤ ·) (Icc a b) :=
IsAntichain.of_strictMonoOn_antitoneOn hf_mono this.antitoneOn
exact this.not_lt (left_mem_Icc.mpr (le_of_lt hab)) (right_mem_Icc.mpr (le_of_lt hab)) hab
replace hf_mono_st : StrictMonoOn f (Icc s t) := hf_mono_st.resolve_right this
have hsx : s ≤ x := min_le_right a x
have hyt : y ≤ t := le_max_right b y
replace : Icc x y ⊆ Icc s t := Icc_subset_Icc hsx hyt
replace : StrictMonoOn f (Icc x y) := StrictMonoOn.mono hf_mono_st this
exact this (left_mem_Icc.mpr (le_of_lt hxy)) (right_mem_Icc.mpr (le_of_lt hxy)) hxy
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/IntermediateValue.lean | 715 | 723 | theorem ContinuousOn.strictMonoOn_of_injOn_Icc {a b : α} {f : α → δ}
(hab : a ≤ b) (hfab : f a ≤ f b)
(hf_c : ContinuousOn f (Icc a b)) (hf_i : InjOn f (Icc a b)) :
StrictMonoOn f (Icc a b) := by |
letI := Icc.completeLinearOrder hab
refine StrictMono.of_restrict ?_
set g : Icc a b → δ := Set.restrict (Icc a b) f
have hgab : g ⊥ ≤ g ⊤ := by aesop
exact Continuous.strictMono_of_inj_boundedOrder (f := g) hf_c.restrict hgab hf_i.injective
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicIntegers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ZMod
#align_import number_theory.padics.ring_homs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"565eb991e264d0db702722b4bde52ee5173c9950"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Nat LocalRing Padic
namespace PadicInt
variable {p : ℕ} [hp_prime : Fact p.Prime]
section RingHoms
variable (p) (r : ℚ)
def modPart : ℤ :=
r.num * gcdA r.den p % p
#align padic_int.mod_part PadicInt.modPart
variable {p}
theorem modPart_lt_p : modPart p r < p := by
convert Int.emod_lt _ _
· simp
· exact mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_lt_p PadicInt.modPart_lt_p
theorem modPart_nonneg : 0 ≤ modPart p r :=
Int.emod_nonneg _ <| mod_cast hp_prime.1.ne_zero
#align padic_int.mod_part_nonneg PadicInt.modPart_nonneg
theorem isUnit_den (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : IsUnit (r.den : ℤ_[p]) := by
rw [isUnit_iff]
apply le_antisymm (r.den : ℤ_[p]).2
rw [← not_lt, coe_natCast]
intro norm_denom_lt
have hr : ‖(r * r.den : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ := by
congr
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rw [padicNormE.mul] at hr
have key : ‖(r.num : ℚ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
calc
_ = _ := hr.symm
_ < 1 * 1 := mul_lt_mul' h norm_denom_lt (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one
_ = 1 := mul_one 1
have : ↑p ∣ r.num ∧ (p : ℤ) ∣ r.den := by
simp only [← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← padic_norm_e_of_padicInt]
exact ⟨key, norm_denom_lt⟩
apply hp_prime.1.not_dvd_one
rwa [← r.reduced.gcd_eq_one, Nat.dvd_gcd_iff, ← Int.natCast_dvd, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
#align padic_int.is_unit_denom PadicInt.isUnit_den
theorem norm_sub_modPart_aux (r : ℚ) (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
↑p ∣ r.num - r.num * r.den.gcdA p % p * ↑r.den := by
rw [← ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_mod, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_sub]
have := congr_arg (fun x => x % p : ℤ → ZMod p) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab r.den p)
simp only [Int.cast_natCast, CharP.cast_eq_zero, EuclideanDomain.mod_zero, Int.cast_add,
Int.cast_mul, zero_mul, add_zero] at this
push_cast
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc, ← this]
suffices rdcp : r.den.Coprime p by
rw [rdcp.gcd_eq_one]
simp only [mul_one, cast_one, sub_self]
apply Coprime.symm
apply (coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp_prime.1 _).resolve_right
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, ← norm_int_lt_one_iff_dvd, not_lt]
apply ge_of_eq
rw [← isUnit_iff]
exact isUnit_den r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part_aux PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart_aux
theorem norm_sub_modPart (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) : ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - modPart p r : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 := by
let n := modPart p r
rw [norm_lt_one_iff_dvd, ← (isUnit_den r h).dvd_mul_right]
suffices ↑p ∣ r.num - n * r.den by
convert (Int.castRingHom ℤ_[p]).map_dvd this
simp only [sub_mul, Int.cast_natCast, eq_intCast, Int.cast_mul, sub_left_inj, Int.cast_sub]
apply Subtype.coe_injective
simp only [coe_mul, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast]
rw_mod_cast [@Rat.mul_den_eq_num r]
rfl
exact norm_sub_modPart_aux r h
#align padic_int.norm_sub_mod_part PadicInt.norm_sub_modPart
theorem exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one (h : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1) :
∃ n : ℤ, 0 ≤ n ∧ n < p ∧ ‖(⟨r, h⟩ - n : ℤ_[p])‖ < 1 :=
⟨modPart p r, modPart_nonneg _, modPart_lt_p _, norm_sub_modPart _ h⟩
#align padic_int.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one PadicInt.exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℤ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
rw [Ideal.mem_span_singleton] at ha hb
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← Int.cast_sub, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, Int.natCast_pow]
rw [← dvd_neg, neg_sub] at ha
have := dvd_add ha hb
rwa [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc, neg_add_cancel_left, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ←
Int.cast_sub, pow_p_dvd_int_iff] at this
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span (n : ℕ) (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ)
(ha : x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n}))
(hb : x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n})) : (a : ZMod (p ^ n)) = b := by
simpa using zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux n x a b ha hb
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span
theorem zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (hm : x - m ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p])
(hn : x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p]) : (m : ZMod p) = n := by
rw [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p] at hm hn
have := zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_span_aux 1 x m n
simp only [pow_one] at this
specialize this hm hn
apply_fun ZMod.castHom (show p ∣ p ^ 1 by rw [pow_one]) (ZMod p) at this
simp only [map_intCast] at this
simpa only [Int.cast_natCast] using this
#align padic_int.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal PadicInt.zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal
variable (x : ℤ_[p])
theorem exists_mem_range : ∃ n : ℕ, n < p ∧ x - n ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
simp only [maximalIdeal_eq_span_p, Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← norm_lt_one_iff_dvd]
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := rat_dense p (x : ℚ_[p]) zero_lt_one
have H : ‖(r : ℚ_[p])‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_sub_rev] at hr
calc
_ = ‖(r : ℚ_[p]) - x + x‖ := by ring_nf
_ ≤ _ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
_ ≤ _ := max_le (le_of_lt hr) x.2
obtain ⟨n, hzn, hnp, hn⟩ := exists_mem_range_of_norm_rat_le_one r H
lift n to ℕ using hzn
use n
constructor
· exact mod_cast hnp
simp only [norm_def, coe_sub, Subtype.coe_mk, coe_natCast] at hn ⊢
rw [show (x - n : ℚ_[p]) = x - r + (r - n) by ring]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _)
apply max_lt hr
simpa using hn
#align padic_int.exists_mem_range PadicInt.exists_mem_range
def zmodRepr : ℕ :=
Classical.choose (exists_mem_range x)
#align padic_int.zmod_repr PadicInt.zmodRepr
theorem zmodRepr_spec : zmodRepr x < p ∧ x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_mem_range x)
#align padic_int.zmod_repr_spec PadicInt.zmodRepr_spec
theorem zmodRepr_lt_p : zmodRepr x < p :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).1
#align padic_int.zmod_repr_lt_p PadicInt.zmodRepr_lt_p
theorem sub_zmodRepr_mem : x - zmodRepr x ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] :=
(zmodRepr_spec _).2
#align padic_int.sub_zmod_repr_mem PadicInt.sub_zmodRepr_mem
def toZModHom (v : ℕ) (f : ℤ_[p] → ℕ) (f_spec : ∀ x, x - f x ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]))
(f_congr :
∀ (x : ℤ_[p]) (a b : ℕ),
x - a ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) →
x - b ∈ (Ideal.span {↑v} : Ideal ℤ_[p]) → (a : ZMod v) = b) :
ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod v where
toFun x := f x
map_zero' := by
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (0 : ℤ_[p]) _ 0, cast_zero]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_zero, cast_zero, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_one' := by
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (1 : ℤ_[p]) _ 1, cast_one]
· exact f_spec _
· simp only [sub_self, cast_one, Submodule.zero_mem]
map_add' := by
intro x y
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (x + y) _ (f x + f y), cast_add]
· exact f_spec _
· convert Ideal.add_mem _ (f_spec x) (f_spec y) using 1
rw [cast_add]
ring
map_mul' := by
intro x y
dsimp only
rw [f_congr (x * y) _ (f x * f y), cast_mul]
· exact f_spec _
· let I : Ideal ℤ_[p] := Ideal.span {↑v}
convert I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left x (f_spec y)) (I.mul_mem_right ↑(f y) (f_spec x)) using 1
rw [cast_mul]
ring
#align padic_int.to_zmod_hom PadicInt.toZModHom
def toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p :=
toZModHom p zmodRepr
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact sub_zmodRepr_mem)
(by
rw [← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
exact zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal)
#align padic_int.to_zmod PadicInt.toZMod
theorem toZMod_spec : x - (ZMod.cast (toZMod x) : ℤ_[p]) ∈ maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
convert sub_zmodRepr_mem x using 2
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt hp_prime.1.pos with ⟨p', rfl⟩
change ↑((_ : ZMod (0 + p' + 1)).val) = (_ : ℤ_[0 + p' + 1])
simp only [ZMod.val_natCast, add_zero, add_def, Nat.cast_inj, zero_add]
apply mod_eq_of_lt
simpa only [zero_add] using zmodRepr_lt_p x
#align padic_int.to_zmod_spec PadicInt.toZMod_spec
theorem ker_toZMod : RingHom.ker (toZMod : ℤ_[p] →+* ZMod p) = maximalIdeal ℤ_[p] := by
ext x
rw [RingHom.mem_ker]
constructor
· intro h
simpa only [h, ZMod.cast_zero, sub_zero] using toZMod_spec x
· intro h
rw [← sub_zero x] at h
dsimp [toZMod, toZModHom]
convert zmod_congr_of_sub_mem_max_ideal x _ 0 _ h
· norm_cast
· apply sub_zmodRepr_mem
#align padic_int.ker_to_zmod PadicInt.ker_toZMod
-- Porting note: removing irreducible solves a lot of problems
noncomputable def appr : ℤ_[p] → ℕ → ℕ
| _x, 0 => 0
| x, n + 1 =>
let y := x - appr x n
if hy : y = 0 then appr x n
else
let u := (unitCoeff hy : ℤ_[p])
appr x n + p ^ n * (toZMod ((u * (p : ℤ_[p]) ^ (y.valuation - n).natAbs) : ℤ_[p])).val
#align padic_int.appr PadicInt.appr
theorem appr_lt (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : x.appr n < p ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih generalizing x
· simp only [appr, zero_eq, _root_.pow_zero, zero_lt_one]
simp only [appr, map_natCast, ZMod.natCast_self, RingHom.map_pow, Int.natAbs, RingHom.map_mul]
have hp : p ^ n < p ^ (n + 1) := by apply pow_lt_pow_right hp_prime.1.one_lt (lt_add_one n)
split_ifs with h
· apply lt_trans (ih _) hp
· calc
_ < p ^ n + p ^ n * (p - 1) := ?_
_ = p ^ (n + 1) := ?_
· apply add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le (ih _)
apply Nat.mul_le_mul_left
apply le_pred_of_lt
apply ZMod.val_lt
· rw [mul_tsub, mul_one, ← _root_.pow_succ]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt hp)
#align padic_int.appr_lt PadicInt.appr_lt
theorem appr_mono (x : ℤ_[p]) : Monotone x.appr := by
apply monotone_nat_of_le_succ
intro n
dsimp [appr]
split_ifs; · rfl
apply Nat.le_add_right
#align padic_int.appr_mono PadicInt.appr_mono
theorem dvd_appr_sub_appr (x : ℤ_[p]) (m n : ℕ) (h : m ≤ n) : p ^ m ∣ x.appr n - x.appr m := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h; clear h
induction' k with k ih
· simp only [zero_eq, add_zero, le_refl, tsub_eq_zero_of_le, ne_eq, Nat.isUnit_iff, dvd_zero]
rw [← add_assoc]
dsimp [appr]
split_ifs with h
· exact ih
rw [add_comm, add_tsub_assoc_of_le (appr_mono _ (Nat.le_add_right m k))]
apply dvd_add _ ih
apply dvd_mul_of_dvd_left
apply pow_dvd_pow _ (Nat.le_add_right m k)
#align padic_int.dvd_appr_sub_appr PadicInt.dvd_appr_sub_appr
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/RingHoms.lean | 351 | 388 | theorem appr_spec (n : ℕ) : ∀ x : ℤ_[p], x - appr x n ∈ Ideal.span {(p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n} := by |
simp only [Ideal.mem_span_singleton]
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [zero_eq, _root_.pow_zero, isUnit_one, IsUnit.dvd, forall_const]
intro x
dsimp only [appr]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
apply dvd_zero
push_cast
rw [sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := ih x
simp only [map_natCast, ZMod.natCast_self, RingHom.map_pow, RingHom.map_mul, ZMod.natCast_val]
have hc' : c ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp only [mul_zero] at hc
contradiction
conv_rhs =>
congr
simp only [hc]
rw [show (x - (appr x n : ℤ_[p])).valuation = ((p : ℤ_[p]) ^ n * c).valuation by rw [hc]]
rw [valuation_p_pow_mul _ _ hc', add_sub_cancel_left, _root_.pow_succ, ← mul_sub]
apply mul_dvd_mul_left
obtain hc0 | hc0 := eq_or_ne c.valuation.natAbs 0
· simp only [hc0, mul_one, _root_.pow_zero]
rw [mul_comm, unitCoeff_spec h] at hc
suffices c = unitCoeff h by
rw [← this, ← Ideal.mem_span_singleton, ← maximalIdeal_eq_span_p]
apply toZMod_spec
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ : IsUnit c := by
-- TODO: write a `CanLift` instance for units
rw [Int.natAbs_eq_zero] at hc0
rw [isUnit_iff, norm_eq_pow_val hc', hc0, neg_zero, zpow_zero]
rw [DiscreteValuationRing.unit_mul_pow_congr_unit _ _ _ _ _ hc]
exact irreducible_p
· simp only [zero_pow hc0, sub_zero, ZMod.cast_zero, mul_zero]
rw [unitCoeff_spec hc']
exact (dvd_pow_self (p : ℤ_[p]) hc0).mul_left _
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.density from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a4ec43f53b0bd44c697bcc3f5a62edd56f269ef1"
open Finset
variable {𝕜 ι κ α β : Type*}
namespace Rel
section Asymmetric
variable [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] (r : α → β → Prop) [∀ a, DecidablePred (r a)] {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α}
{t t₁ t₂ : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β} {δ : 𝕜}
def interedges (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) :=
(s ×ˢ t).filter fun e ↦ r e.1 e.2
#align rel.interedges Rel.interedges
def edgeDensity (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : ℚ :=
(interedges r s t).card / (s.card * t.card)
#align rel.edge_density Rel.edgeDensity
variable {r}
theorem mem_interedges_iff {x : α × β} : x ∈ interedges r s t ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t ∧ r x.1 x.2 := by
rw [interedges, mem_filter, Finset.mem_product, and_assoc]
#align rel.mem_interedges_iff Rel.mem_interedges_iff
theorem mk_mem_interedges_iff : (a, b) ∈ interedges r s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ r a b :=
mem_interedges_iff
#align rel.mk_mem_interedges_iff Rel.mk_mem_interedges_iff
@[simp]
theorem interedges_empty_left (t : Finset β) : interedges r ∅ t = ∅ := by
rw [interedges, Finset.empty_product, filter_empty]
#align rel.interedges_empty_left Rel.interedges_empty_left
theorem interedges_mono (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : interedges r s₂ t₂ ⊆ interedges r s₁ t₁ :=
fun x ↦ by
simp_rw [mem_interedges_iff]
exact fun h ↦ ⟨hs h.1, ht h.2.1, h.2.2⟩
#align rel.interedges_mono Rel.interedges_mono
variable (r)
theorem card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
(interedges r s t).card + (interedges (fun x y ↦ ¬r x y) s t).card = s.card * t.card := by
classical
rw [← card_product, interedges, interedges, ← card_union_of_disjoint, filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
exact disjoint_filter.2 fun _ _ ↦ Classical.not_not.2
#align rel.card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl Rel.card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl
theorem interedges_disjoint_left {s s' : Finset α} (hs : Disjoint s s') (t : Finset β) :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s' t) := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at hs ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact hs hx.1 hy.1
#align rel.interedges_disjoint_left Rel.interedges_disjoint_left
theorem interedges_disjoint_right (s : Finset α) {t t' : Finset β} (ht : Disjoint t t') :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s t') := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at ht ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact ht hx.2.1 hy.2.1
#align rel.interedges_disjoint_right Rel.interedges_disjoint_right
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
lemma interedges_eq_biUnion :
interedges r s t = s.biUnion (fun x ↦ (t.filter (r x)).map ⟨(x, ·), Prod.mk.inj_left x⟩) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [mem_interedges_iff]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Density.lean | 109 | 112 | theorem interedges_biUnion_left (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset β) (f : ι → Finset α) :
interedges r (s.biUnion f) t = s.biUnion fun a ↦ interedges r (f a) t := by |
ext
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_interedges_iff, exists_and_right, ← and_assoc]
|
set_option autoImplicit true
namespace Array
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Array/ExtractLemmas.lean | 16 | 19 | theorem extract_eq_nil_of_start_eq_end {a : Array α} :
a.extract i i = #[] := by |
refine extract_empty_of_stop_le_start a ?h
exact Nat.le_refl i
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Algebra
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.cyclotomic.expand from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0723536a0522d24fc2f159a096fb3304bef77472"
namespace Polynomial
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n)
(R : Type*) [CommRing R] :
expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R * cyclotomic n R := by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n with (rfl | hnpos)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hnpos
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ * cyclotomic n ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int,
map_cyclotomic]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le ((cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ).mul (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· refine (IsPrimitive.Int.dvd_iff_map_cast_dvd_map_cast _ _
(IsPrimitive.mul (cyclotomic.isPrimitive (n * p) ℤ) (cyclotomic.isPrimitive n ℤ))
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos).isPrimitive).2 ?_
rw [Polynomial.map_mul, map_cyclotomic_int, map_cyclotomic_int, map_expand, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine IsCoprime.mul_dvd (cyclotomic.isCoprime_rat fun h => ?_) ?_ ?_
· replace h : n * p = n * 1 := by simp [h]
exact Nat.Prime.ne_one hp (mul_left_cancel₀ hnpos.ne' h)
· have hpos : 0 < n * p := mul_pos hnpos hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne'
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ (Nat.Prime.pos hp)]
· have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hnpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos]
refine minpoly.dvd ℚ _ ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def, ←
cyclotomic_eq_minpoly_rat hprim hnpos, map_cyclotomic, @isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
exact IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_prime hprim hp hdiv
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_mul (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ) (cyclotomic_ne_zero _ ℤ), natDegree_cyclotomic,
natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul ((Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp).2 hdiv), Nat.totient_prime hp,
mul_comm (p - 1), ← Nat.mul_succ, Nat.sub_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos hp.pos]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic_mul
@[simp]
theorem cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic {p n : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hdiv : p ∣ n) (R : Type*)
[CommRing R] : expand R p (cyclotomic n R) = cyclotomic (n * p) R := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hzero)
· simp
haveI := NeZero.of_pos hzero
suffices expand ℤ p (cyclotomic n ℤ) = cyclotomic (n * p) ℤ by
rw [← map_cyclotomic_int, ← map_expand, this, map_cyclotomic_int]
refine eq_of_monic_of_dvd_of_natDegree_le (cyclotomic.monic _ ℤ)
((cyclotomic.monic n ℤ).expand hp.pos) ?_ ?_
· have hpos := Nat.mul_pos hzero hp.pos
have hprim := Complex.isPrimitiveRoot_exp _ hpos.ne.symm
rw [cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hprim hpos]
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (hprim.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, ← eval_map, map_expand, map_cyclotomic, expand_eval, ← IsRoot.def,
@isRoot_cyclotomic_iff]
convert IsPrimitiveRoot.pow_of_dvd hprim hp.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left p n)
rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp.pos]
· rw [natDegree_expand, natDegree_cyclotomic, natDegree_cyclotomic, mul_comm n,
Nat.totient_mul_of_prime_of_dvd hp hdiv, mul_comm]
#align polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic Polynomial.cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Expand.lean | 100 | 110 | theorem cyclotomic_irreducible_pow_of_irreducible_pow {p : ℕ} (hp : Nat.Prime p) {R} [CommRing R]
[IsDomain R] {n m : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (h : Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ n) R)) :
Irreducible (cyclotomic (p ^ m) R) := by |
rcases m.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hm)
· simpa using irreducible_X_sub_C (1 : R)
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hmn
induction' k with k hk
· simpa using h
have : m + k ≠ 0 := (add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hm k.zero_le).ne'
rw [Nat.add_succ, pow_succ, ← cyclotomic_expand_eq_cyclotomic hp <| dvd_pow_self p this] at h
exact hk (by omega) (of_irreducible_expand hp.ne_zero h)
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
#align_import data.list.sort from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
open List.Perm
universe u
namespace List
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
#align list.sorted List.Sorted
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
#align list.decidable_sorted List.decidableSorted
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.sorted_nil List.sorted_nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
#align list.sorted.of_cons List.Sorted.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
#align list.sorted.tail List.Sorted.tail
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
#align list.rel_of_sorted_cons List.rel_of_sorted_cons
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 80 | 85 | theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by |
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
|
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Integration
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L2Space
#align_import probability.variance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
-- Porting note: this lemma replaces `ENNReal.toReal_bit0`, which does not exist in Lean 4
private lemma coe_two : ENNReal.toReal 2 = (2 : ℝ) := rfl
-- Porting note: Consider if `evariance` or `eVariance` is better. Also,
-- consider `eVariationOn` in `Mathlib.Analysis.BoundedVariation`.
def evariance {Ω : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ ω, (‖X ω - μ[X]‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 ∂μ
#align probability_theory.evariance ProbabilityTheory.evariance
def variance {Ω : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) : ℝ :=
(evariance X μ).toReal
#align probability_theory.variance ProbabilityTheory.variance
variable {Ω : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace Ω} {X : Ω → ℝ} {μ : Measure Ω}
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_lt_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ) :
evariance X μ < ∞ := by
have := ENNReal.pow_lt_top (hX.sub <| memℒp_const <| μ[X]).2 2
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
simp only [coe_two, Pi.sub_apply, ENNReal.one_toReal, one_div] at this
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ENNReal.rpow_one] at this
simp_rw [ENNReal.rpow_two] at this
exact this
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.evariance_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_lt_top
theorem evariance_eq_top [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hXm : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) (hX : ¬Memℒp X 2 μ) :
evariance X μ = ∞ := by
by_contra h
rw [← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top] at h
have : Memℒp (fun ω => X ω - μ[X]) 2 μ := by
refine ⟨hXm.sub aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top]
simp only [coe_two, ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_two, Ne]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (by linarith) h.ne
refine hX ?_
-- Porting note: `μ[X]` without whitespace is ambiguous as it could be GetElem,
-- and `convert` cannot disambiguate based on typeclass inference failure.
convert this.add (memℒp_const <| μ [X])
ext ω
rw [Pi.add_apply, sub_add_cancel]
#align probability_theory.evariance_eq_top ProbabilityTheory.evariance_eq_top
theorem evariance_lt_top_iff_memℒp [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : AEStronglyMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ < ∞ ↔ Memℒp X 2 μ := by
refine ⟨?_, MeasureTheory.Memℒp.evariance_lt_top⟩
contrapose
rw [not_lt, top_le_iff]
exact evariance_eq_top hX
#align probability_theory.evariance_lt_top_iff_mem_ℒp ProbabilityTheory.evariance_lt_top_iff_memℒp
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal_variance_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ) :
ENNReal.ofReal (variance X μ) = evariance X μ := by
rw [variance, ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
exact hX.evariance_lt_top.ne
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_real_variance_eq MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ofReal_variance_eq
theorem evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
evariance X μ = ∫⁻ ω, ENNReal.ofReal ((X ω - μ[X]) ^ 2) ∂μ := by
rw [evariance]
congr
ext1 ω
rw [pow_two, ← ENNReal.coe_mul, ← nnnorm_mul, ← pow_two]
congr
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_nnnorm_of_nonneg <| sq_nonneg _).symm
#align probability_theory.evariance_eq_lintegral_of_real ProbabilityTheory.evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq_of_integral_eq_zero (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ)
(hXint : μ[X] = 0) : variance X μ = μ[X ^ (2 : Nat)] := by
rw [variance, evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (by positivity)] <;>
simp_rw [hXint, sub_zero]
· rfl
· convert hX.integrable_norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top with ω
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, coe_two, ENNReal.one_toReal,
Real.rpow_two, sq_abs, abs_pow]
· exact ae_of_all _ fun ω => pow_two_nonneg _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.variance_eq_of_integral_eq_zero MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq_of_integral_eq_zero
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hX : Memℒp X 2 μ) :
variance X μ = μ[(X - fun _ => μ[X] :) ^ (2 : Nat)] := by
rw [variance, evariance_eq_lintegral_ofReal, ← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal,
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (by positivity)]
· rfl
· -- Porting note: `μ[X]` without whitespace is ambiguous as it could be GetElem,
-- and `convert` cannot disambiguate based on typeclass inference failure.
convert (hX.sub <| memℒp_const (μ [X])).integrable_norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.two_ne_top
with ω
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, coe_two, ENNReal.one_toReal,
Real.rpow_two, sq_abs, abs_pow]
· exact ae_of_all _ fun ω => pow_two_nonneg _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.variance_eq MeasureTheory.Memℒp.variance_eq
@[simp]
theorem evariance_zero : evariance 0 μ = 0 := by simp [evariance]
#align probability_theory.evariance_zero ProbabilityTheory.evariance_zero
theorem evariance_eq_zero_iff (hX : AEMeasurable X μ) :
evariance X μ = 0 ↔ X =ᵐ[μ] fun _ => μ[X] := by
rw [evariance, lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
constructor <;> intro hX <;> filter_upwards [hX] with ω hω
· simpa only [Pi.zero_apply, sq_eq_zero_iff, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, nnnorm_eq_zero, sub_eq_zero]
using hω
· rw [hω]
simp
· exact (hX.sub_const _).ennnorm.pow_const _ -- TODO `measurability` and `fun_prop` fail
#align probability_theory.evariance_eq_zero_iff ProbabilityTheory.evariance_eq_zero_iff
theorem evariance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
evariance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = ENNReal.ofReal (c ^ 2) * evariance X μ := by
rw [evariance, evariance, ← lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top.ne]
congr
ext1 ω
rw [ENNReal.ofReal, ← ENNReal.coe_pow, ← ENNReal.coe_pow, ← ENNReal.coe_mul]
congr
rw [← sq_abs, ← Real.rpow_two, Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg _), NNReal.rpow_two,
← mul_pow, Real.toNNReal_mul_nnnorm _ (abs_nonneg _)]
conv_rhs => rw [← nnnorm_norm, norm_mul, norm_abs_eq_norm, ← norm_mul, nnnorm_norm, mul_sub]
congr
rw [mul_comm]
simp_rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← integral_smul_const, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align probability_theory.evariance_mul ProbabilityTheory.evariance_mul
scoped notation "eVar[" X "]" => ProbabilityTheory.evariance X MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace.volume
@[simp]
theorem variance_zero (μ : Measure Ω) : variance 0 μ = 0 := by
simp only [variance, evariance_zero, ENNReal.zero_toReal]
#align probability_theory.variance_zero ProbabilityTheory.variance_zero
theorem variance_nonneg (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) : 0 ≤ variance X μ :=
ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align probability_theory.variance_nonneg ProbabilityTheory.variance_nonneg
| Mathlib/Probability/Variance.lean | 183 | 186 | theorem variance_mul (c : ℝ) (X : Ω → ℝ) (μ : Measure Ω) :
variance (fun ω => c * X ω) μ = c ^ 2 * variance X μ := by |
rw [variance, evariance_mul, ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (sq_nonneg _)]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Pi
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue
open scoped Classical ENNReal
open Set Function Equiv Finset
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
section LMarginal
variable {δ δ' : Type*} {π : δ → Type*} [∀ x, MeasurableSpace (π x)]
variable {μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)} [∀ i, SigmaFinite (μ i)] [DecidableEq δ]
variable {s t : Finset δ} {f g : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞} {x y : ∀ i, π i} {i : δ}
def lmarginal (μ : ∀ i, Measure (π i)) (s : Finset δ) (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(x : ∀ i, π i) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
∫⁻ y : ∀ i : s, π i, f (updateFinset x s y) ∂Measure.pi fun i : s => μ i
-- Note: this notation is not a binder. This is more convenient since it returns a function.
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f " ∂" μ:70 => lmarginal μ s f
@[inherit_doc]
notation "∫⋯∫⁻_" s ", " f => lmarginal (fun _ ↦ volume) s f
variable (μ)
theorem _root_.Measurable.lmarginal (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) := by
refine Measurable.lintegral_prod_right ?_
refine hf.comp ?_
rw [measurable_pi_iff]; intro i
by_cases hi : i ∈ s
· simp [hi, updateFinset]
exact measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_snd _
· simp [hi, updateFinset]
exact measurable_pi_iff.1 measurable_fst _
@[simp] theorem lmarginal_empty (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) : ∫⋯∫⁻_∅, f ∂μ = f := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [lmarginal, Measure.pi_of_empty fun i : (∅ : Finset δ) => μ i]
apply lintegral_dirac'
exact Subsingleton.measurable
theorem lmarginal_congr {x y : ∀ i, π i} (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞)
(h : ∀ i ∉ s, x i = y i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) y := by
dsimp [lmarginal, updateFinset_def]; rcongr; exact h _ ‹_›
theorem lmarginal_update_of_mem {i : δ} (hi : i ∈ s)
(f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (x : ∀ i, π i) (y : π i) :
(∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) (Function.update x i y) = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, f ∂μ) x := by
apply lmarginal_congr
intro j hj
have : j ≠ i := by rintro rfl; exact hj hi
apply update_noteq this
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Marginal.lean | 118 | 135 | theorem lmarginal_union (f : (∀ i, π i) → ℝ≥0∞) (hf : Measurable f)
(hst : Disjoint s t) : ∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ = ∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ := by |
ext1 x
let e := MeasurableEquiv.piFinsetUnion π hst
calc (∫⋯∫⁻_s ∪ t, f ∂μ) x
= ∫⁻ (y : (i : ↥(s ∪ t)) → π i), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) y)
∂.pi fun i' : ↥(s ∪ t) ↦ μ i' := rfl
_ = ∫⁻ (y : ((i : s) → π i) × ((j : t) → π j)), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) _)
∂(Measure.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i).prod (.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j) := by
rw [measurePreserving_piFinsetUnion hst μ |>.lintegral_map_equiv]
_ = ∫⁻ (y : (i : s) → π i), ∫⁻ (z : (j : t) → π j), f (updateFinset x (s ∪ t) (e (y, z)))
∂.pi fun j : t ↦ μ j ∂.pi fun i : s ↦ μ i := by
apply lintegral_prod
apply Measurable.aemeasurable
exact hf.comp <| measurable_updateFinset.comp e.measurable
_ = (∫⋯∫⁻_s, ∫⋯∫⁻_t, f ∂μ ∂μ) x := by
simp_rw [lmarginal, updateFinset_updateFinset hst]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Pi
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.affine_map from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bd1fc183335ea95a9519a1630bcf901fe9326d83"
open Affine
structure AffineMap (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*) [Ring k]
[AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] where
toFun : P1 → P2
linear : V1 →ₗ[k] V2
map_vadd' : ∀ (p : P1) (v : V1), toFun (v +ᵥ p) = linear v +ᵥ toFun p
#align affine_map AffineMap
notation:25 P1 " →ᵃ[" k:25 "] " P2:0 => AffineMap k P1 P2
instance AffineMap.instFunLike (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*)
[Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] : FunLike (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) P1 P2 where
coe := AffineMap.toFun
coe_injective' := fun ⟨f, f_linear, f_add⟩ ⟨g, g_linear, g_add⟩ => fun (h : f = g) => by
cases' (AddTorsor.nonempty : Nonempty P1) with p
congr with v
apply vadd_right_cancel (f p)
erw [← f_add, h, ← g_add]
#align affine_map.fun_like AffineMap.instFunLike
instance AffineMap.hasCoeToFun (k : Type*) {V1 : Type*} (P1 : Type*) {V2 : Type*} (P2 : Type*)
[Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1] [AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2]
[AffineSpace V2 P2] : CoeFun (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) fun _ => P1 → P2 :=
DFunLike.hasCoeToFun
#align affine_map.has_coe_to_fun AffineMap.hasCoeToFun
namespace AffineMap
variable {k : Type*} {V1 : Type*} {P1 : Type*} {V2 : Type*} {P2 : Type*} {V3 : Type*}
{P3 : Type*} {V4 : Type*} {P4 : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V1] [Module k V1]
[AffineSpace V1 P1] [AddCommGroup V2] [Module k V2] [AffineSpace V2 P2] [AddCommGroup V3]
[Module k V3] [AffineSpace V3 P3] [AddCommGroup V4] [Module k V4] [AffineSpace V4 P4]
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : P1 → P2) (linear add) : ((mk f linear add : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : P1 → P2) = f :=
rfl
#align affine_map.coe_mk AffineMap.coe_mk
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) : f.toFun = ⇑f :=
rfl
#align affine_map.to_fun_eq_coe AffineMap.toFun_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_vadd (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p : P1) (v : V1) : f (v +ᵥ p) = f.linear v +ᵥ f p :=
f.map_vadd' p v
#align affine_map.map_vadd AffineMap.map_vadd
@[simp]
theorem linearMap_vsub (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (p1 p2 : P1) : f.linear (p1 -ᵥ p2) = f p1 -ᵥ f p2 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← vsub_vadd p1 p2, map_vadd, vadd_vsub]
#align affine_map.linear_map_vsub AffineMap.linearMap_vsub
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : ∀ p, f p = g p) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align affine_map.ext AffineMap.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} : f = g ↔ ∀ p, f p = g p :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ rfl, ext⟩
#align affine_map.ext_iff AffineMap.ext_iff
theorem coeFn_injective : @Function.Injective (P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) (P1 → P2) (⇑) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align affine_map.coe_fn_injective AffineMap.coeFn_injective
protected theorem congr_arg (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) {x y : P1} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg _ h
#align affine_map.congr_arg AffineMap.congr_arg
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h : f = g) (x : P1) : f x = g x :=
h ▸ rfl
#align affine_map.congr_fun AffineMap.congr_fun
theorem ext_linear {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} (h₁ : f.linear = g.linear) {p : P1} (h₂ : f p = g p) :
f = g := by
ext q
have hgl : g.linear (q -ᵥ p) = toFun g ((q -ᵥ p) +ᵥ q) -ᵥ toFun g q := by simp
have := f.map_vadd' q (q -ᵥ p)
rw [h₁, hgl, toFun_eq_coe, map_vadd, linearMap_vsub, h₂] at this
simp at this
exact this
theorem ext_linear_iff {f g : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2} : f = g ↔ (f.linear = g.linear) ∧ (∃ p, f p = g p) :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨congrArg _ h, by inhabit P1; exact default, by rw [h]⟩,
fun h ↦ Exists.casesOn h.2 fun _ hp ↦ ext_linear h.1 hp⟩
variable (k P1)
def const (p : P2) : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2 where
toFun := Function.const P1 p
linear := 0
map_vadd' _ _ :=
letI : AddAction V2 P2 := inferInstance
by simp
#align affine_map.const AffineMap.const
@[simp]
theorem coe_const (p : P2) : ⇑(const k P1 p) = Function.const P1 p :=
rfl
#align affine_map.coe_const AffineMap.coe_const
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (p : P2) (q : P1) : (const k P1 p) q = p := rfl
@[simp]
theorem const_linear (p : P2) : (const k P1 p).linear = 0 :=
rfl
#align affine_map.const_linear AffineMap.const_linear
variable {k P1}
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/AffineMap.lean | 203 | 211 | theorem linear_eq_zero_iff_exists_const (f : P1 →ᵃ[k] P2) :
f.linear = 0 ↔ ∃ q, f = const k P1 q := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· use f (Classical.arbitrary P1)
ext
rw [coe_const, Function.const_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V2, ← f.linearMap_vsub, h,
LinearMap.zero_apply]
· rcases h with ⟨q, rfl⟩
exact const_linear k P1 q
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import data.polynomial.derivative from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
dsimp only
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
#align polynomial.derivative Polynomial.derivative
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.derivative_apply Polynomial.derivative_apply
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align polynomial.coeff_derivative Polynomial.coeff_derivative
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
#align polynomial.derivative_zero Polynomial.derivative_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.derivative_monomial Polynomial.derivative_monomial
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_X_pow
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_X_sq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 121 | 121 | theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by | simp [derivative_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Substructures
#align_import model_theory.elementary_maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d11893b411025250c8e61ff2f12ccbd7ee35ab15"
open FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure
variable (L : Language) (M : Type*) (N : Type*) {P : Type*} {Q : Type*}
variable [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P] [L.Structure Q]
structure ElementaryEmbedding where
toFun : M → N
-- Porting note:
-- The autoparam here used to be `obviously`. We would like to replace it with `aesop`
-- but that isn't currently sufficient.
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Aesop.20and.20cases
-- If that can be improved, we should change this to `by aesop` and remove the proofs below.
map_formula' :
∀ ⦃n⦄ (φ : L.Formula (Fin n)) (x : Fin n → M), φ.Realize (toFun ∘ x) ↔ φ.Realize x := by
intros; trivial
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.to_fun FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.toFun
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.map_formula' FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.map_formula'
@[inherit_doc FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding]
scoped[FirstOrder] notation:25 A " ↪ₑ[" L "] " B => FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding L A B
variable {L} {M} {N}
namespace ElementaryEmbedding
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instFunLike : FunLike (M ↪ₑ[L] N) M N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
cases f
cases g
simp only [ElementaryEmbedding.mk.injEq]
ext x
exact Function.funext_iff.1 h x
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.fun_like FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.instFunLike
instance : CoeFun (M ↪ₑ[L] N) fun _ => M → N :=
DFunLike.hasCoeToFun
@[simp]
theorem map_boundedFormula (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) {α : Type*} {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n)
(v : α → M) (xs : Fin n → M) : φ.Realize (f ∘ v) (f ∘ xs) ↔ φ.Realize v xs := by
classical
rw [← BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar Set.Subset.rfl, Set.inclusion_eq_id, iff_eq_eq]
have h :=
f.map_formula' ((φ.restrictFreeVar id).toFormula.relabel (Fintype.equivFin _))
(Sum.elim (v ∘ (↑)) xs ∘ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm)
simp only [Formula.realize_relabel, BoundedFormula.realize_toFormula, iff_eq_eq] at h
rw [← Function.comp.assoc _ _ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm,
Function.comp.assoc _ (Fintype.equivFin _).symm (Fintype.equivFin _),
_root_.Equiv.symm_comp_self, Function.comp_id, Function.comp.assoc, Sum.elim_comp_inl,
Function.comp.assoc _ _ Sum.inr, Sum.elim_comp_inr, ← Function.comp.assoc] at h
refine h.trans ?_
erw [Function.comp.assoc _ _ (Fintype.equivFin _), _root_.Equiv.symm_comp_self,
Function.comp_id, Sum.elim_comp_inl, Sum.elim_comp_inr (v ∘ Subtype.val) xs,
← Set.inclusion_eq_id (s := (BoundedFormula.freeVarFinset φ : Set α)) Set.Subset.rfl,
BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar Set.Subset.rfl]
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.map_bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.map_boundedFormula
@[simp]
theorem map_formula (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) {α : Type*} (φ : L.Formula α) (x : α → M) :
φ.Realize (f ∘ x) ↔ φ.Realize x := by
rw [Formula.Realize, Formula.Realize, ← f.map_boundedFormula, Unique.eq_default (f ∘ default)]
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.map_formula FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.map_formula
theorem map_sentence (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) (φ : L.Sentence) : M ⊨ φ ↔ N ⊨ φ := by
rw [Sentence.Realize, Sentence.Realize, ← f.map_formula, Unique.eq_default (f ∘ default)]
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.map_sentence FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.map_sentence
theorem theory_model_iff (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) (T : L.Theory) : M ⊨ T ↔ N ⊨ T := by
simp only [Theory.model_iff, f.map_sentence]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.Theory_model_iff FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.theory_model_iff
theorem elementarilyEquivalent (f : M ↪ₑ[L] N) : M ≅[L] N :=
elementarilyEquivalent_iff.2 f.map_sentence
#align first_order.language.elementary_embedding.elementarily_equivalent FirstOrder.Language.ElementaryEmbedding.elementarilyEquivalent
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/ElementaryMaps.lean | 117 | 124 | theorem injective (φ : M ↪ₑ[L] N) : Function.Injective φ := by |
intro x y
have h :=
φ.map_formula ((var 0).equal (var 1) : L.Formula (Fin 2)) fun i => if i = 0 then x else y
rw [Formula.realize_equal, Formula.realize_equal] at h
simp only [Nat.one_ne_zero, Term.realize, Fin.one_eq_zero_iff, if_true, eq_self_iff_true,
Function.comp_apply, if_false] at h
exact h.1
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.LinearIsometry
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.SelfAdjoint
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Subalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Star
#align_import analysis.normed_space.star.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"aa6669832974f87406a3d9d70fc5707a60546207"
open Topology
local postfix:max "⋆" => star
class NormedStarGroup (E : Type*) [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [StarAddMonoid E] : Prop where
norm_star : ∀ x : E, ‖x⋆‖ = ‖x‖
#align normed_star_group NormedStarGroup
export NormedStarGroup (norm_star)
attribute [simp] norm_star
variable {𝕜 E α : Type*}
instance RingHomIsometric.starRingEnd [NormedCommRing E] [StarRing E] [NormedStarGroup E] :
RingHomIsometric (starRingEnd E) :=
⟨@norm_star _ _ _ _⟩
#align ring_hom_isometric.star_ring_end RingHomIsometric.starRingEnd
class CstarRing (E : Type*) [NonUnitalNormedRing E] [StarRing E] : Prop where
norm_star_mul_self : ∀ {x : E}, ‖x⋆ * x‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖
#align cstar_ring CstarRing
instance : CstarRing ℝ where norm_star_mul_self {x} := by simp only [star, id, norm_mul]
namespace CstarRing
section NonUnital
variable [NonUnitalNormedRing E] [StarRing E] [CstarRing E]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) to_normedStarGroup : NormedStarGroup E :=
⟨by
intro x
by_cases htriv : x = 0
· simp only [htriv, star_zero]
· have hnt : 0 < ‖x‖ := norm_pos_iff.mpr htriv
have hnt_star : 0 < ‖x⋆‖ :=
norm_pos_iff.mpr ((AddEquiv.map_ne_zero_iff starAddEquiv (M := E)).mpr htriv)
have h₁ :=
calc
‖x‖ * ‖x‖ = ‖x⋆ * x‖ := norm_star_mul_self.symm
_ ≤ ‖x⋆‖ * ‖x‖ := norm_mul_le _ _
have h₂ :=
calc
‖x⋆‖ * ‖x⋆‖ = ‖x * x⋆‖ := by rw [← norm_star_mul_self, star_star]
_ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖x⋆‖ := norm_mul_le _ _
exact le_antisymm (le_of_mul_le_mul_right h₂ hnt_star) (le_of_mul_le_mul_right h₁ hnt)⟩
#align cstar_ring.to_normed_star_group CstarRing.to_normedStarGroup
theorem norm_self_mul_star {x : E} : ‖x * x⋆‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
nth_rw 1 [← star_star x]
simp only [norm_star_mul_self, norm_star]
#align cstar_ring.norm_self_mul_star CstarRing.norm_self_mul_star
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Star/Basic.lean | 123 | 123 | theorem norm_star_mul_self' {x : E} : ‖x⋆ * x‖ = ‖x⋆‖ * ‖x‖ := by | rw [norm_star_mul_self, norm_star]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
#align_import data.list.sort from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
open List.Perm
universe u
namespace List
section Sorted
variable {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α}
def Sorted :=
@Pairwise
#align list.sorted List.Sorted
instance decidableSorted [DecidableRel r] (l : List α) : Decidable (Sorted r l) :=
List.instDecidablePairwise _
#align list.decidable_sorted List.decidableSorted
protected theorem Sorted.le_of_lt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· < ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≤ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.lt_of_le [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≤ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· < ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) h₂
protected theorem Sorted.ge_of_gt [Preorder α] {l : List α} (h : l.Sorted (· > ·)) :
l.Sorted (· ≥ ·) :=
h.imp le_of_lt
protected theorem Sorted.gt_of_ge [PartialOrder α] {l : List α} (h₁ : l.Sorted (· ≥ ·))
(h₂ : l.Nodup) : l.Sorted (· > ·) :=
h₁.imp₂ (fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_ne) <| by simp_rw [ne_comm]; exact h₂
@[simp]
theorem sorted_nil : Sorted r [] :=
Pairwise.nil
#align list.sorted_nil List.sorted_nil
theorem Sorted.of_cons : Sorted r (a :: l) → Sorted r l :=
Pairwise.of_cons
#align list.sorted.of_cons List.Sorted.of_cons
theorem Sorted.tail {r : α → α → Prop} {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) : Sorted r l.tail :=
Pairwise.tail h
#align list.sorted.tail List.Sorted.tail
theorem rel_of_sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) → ∀ b ∈ l, r a b :=
rel_of_pairwise_cons
#align list.rel_of_sorted_cons List.rel_of_sorted_cons
theorem Sorted.head!_le [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· < ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : l.head! ≤ a := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
theorem Sorted.le_head! [Inhabited α] [Preorder α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : Sorted (· > ·) l)
(ha : a ∈ l) : a ≤ l.head! := by
rw [← List.cons_head!_tail (List.ne_nil_of_mem ha)] at h ha
cases ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact le_of_lt (rel_of_sorted_cons h a (by assumption))
@[simp]
theorem sorted_cons {a : α} {l : List α} : Sorted r (a :: l) ↔ (∀ b ∈ l, r a b) ∧ Sorted r l :=
pairwise_cons
#align list.sorted_cons List.sorted_cons
protected theorem Sorted.nodup {r : α → α → Prop} [IsIrrefl α r] {l : List α} (h : Sorted r l) :
Nodup l :=
Pairwise.nodup h
#align list.sorted.nodup List.Sorted.nodup
theorem eq_of_perm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ ~ l₂) (hs₁ : Sorted r l₁)
(hs₂ : Sorted r l₂) : l₁ = l₂ := by
induction' hs₁ with a l₁ h₁ hs₁ IH generalizing l₂
· exact hp.nil_eq
· have : a ∈ l₂ := hp.subset (mem_cons_self _ _)
rcases append_of_mem this with ⟨u₂, v₂, rfl⟩
have hp' := (perm_cons a).1 (hp.trans perm_middle)
obtain rfl := IH hp' (hs₂.sublist <| by simp)
change a :: u₂ ++ v₂ = u₂ ++ ([a] ++ v₂)
rw [← append_assoc]
congr
have : ∀ x ∈ u₂, x = a := fun x m =>
antisymm ((pairwise_append.1 hs₂).2.2 _ m a (mem_cons_self _ _)) (h₁ _ (by simp [m]))
rw [(@eq_replicate _ a (length u₂ + 1) (a :: u₂)).2,
(@eq_replicate _ a (length u₂ + 1) (u₂ ++ [a])).2] <;>
constructor <;>
simp [iff_true_intro this, or_comm]
#align list.eq_of_perm_of_sorted List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sort.lean | 123 | 126 | theorem sublist_of_subperm_of_sorted [IsAntisymm α r] {l₁ l₂ : List α} (hp : l₁ <+~ l₂)
(hs₁ : l₁.Sorted r) (hs₂ : l₂.Sorted r) : l₁ <+ l₂ := by |
let ⟨_, h, h'⟩ := hp
rwa [← eq_of_perm_of_sorted h (hs₂.sublist h') hs₁]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
variable {α : Type*} (S : Set (Set α))
structure FiniteInter : Prop where
univ_mem : Set.univ ∈ S
inter_mem : ∀ ⦃s⦄, s ∈ S → ∀ ⦃t⦄, t ∈ S → s ∩ t ∈ S
#align has_finite_inter FiniteInter
namespace FiniteInter
inductive finiteInterClosure : Set (Set α)
| basic {s} : s ∈ S → finiteInterClosure s
| univ : finiteInterClosure Set.univ
| inter {s t} : finiteInterClosure s → finiteInterClosure t → finiteInterClosure (s ∩ t)
#align has_finite_inter.finite_inter_closure FiniteInter.finiteInterClosure
theorem finiteInterClosure_finiteInter : FiniteInter (finiteInterClosure S) :=
{ univ_mem := finiteInterClosure.univ
inter_mem := fun _ h _ => finiteInterClosure.inter h }
#align has_finite_inter.finite_inter_closure_has_finite_inter FiniteInter.finiteInterClosure_finiteInter
variable {S}
theorem finiteInter_mem (cond : FiniteInter S) (F : Finset (Set α)) :
↑F ⊆ S → ⋂₀ (↑F : Set (Set α)) ∈ S := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on F (fun _ => ?_) ?_
· simp [cond.univ_mem]
· intro a s _ h1 h2
suffices a ∩ ⋂₀ ↑s ∈ S by simpa
exact
cond.inter_mem (h2 (Finset.mem_insert_self a s))
(h1 fun x hx => h2 <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hx)
#align has_finite_inter.finite_inter_mem FiniteInter.finiteInter_mem
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Constructions.lean | 66 | 82 | theorem finiteInterClosure_insert {A : Set α} (cond : FiniteInter S) (P)
(H : P ∈ finiteInterClosure (insert A S)) : P ∈ S ∨ ∃ Q ∈ S, P = A ∩ Q := by |
induction' H with S h T1 T2 _ _ h1 h2
· cases h
· exact Or.inr ⟨Set.univ, cond.univ_mem, by simpa⟩
· exact Or.inl (by assumption)
· exact Or.inl cond.univ_mem
· rcases h1 with (h | ⟨Q, hQ, rfl⟩) <;> rcases h2 with (i | ⟨R, hR, rfl⟩)
· exact Or.inl (cond.inter_mem h i)
· exact
Or.inr ⟨T1 ∩ R, cond.inter_mem h hR, by simp only [← Set.inter_assoc, Set.inter_comm _ A]⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨Q ∩ T2, cond.inter_mem hQ i, by simp only [Set.inter_assoc]⟩
· exact
Or.inr
⟨Q ∩ R, cond.inter_mem hQ hR, by
ext x
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.concrete from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
def toList : List α :=
(List.range (cycleOf p x).support.card).map fun k => (p ^ k) x
#align equiv.perm.to_list Equiv.Perm.toList
@[simp]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 221 | 221 | theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by | simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import probability.martingale.upcrossing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_aux MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTimeAux
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_zero
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 168 | 170 | theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by |
rw [upperCrossingTime]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
#align_import topology.bases from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
open Set Filter Function Topology
noncomputable section
namespace TopologicalSpace
universe u
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] {B : Set (Set α)} {s : Set α}
structure IsTopologicalBasis (s : Set (Set α)) : Prop where
exists_subset_inter : ∀ t₁ ∈ s, ∀ t₂ ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ t₁ ∩ t₂, ∃ t₃ ∈ s, x ∈ t₃ ∧ t₃ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂
sUnion_eq : ⋃₀ s = univ
eq_generateFrom : t = generateFrom s
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (insert ∅ s) := by
refine ⟨?_, by rw [sUnion_insert, empty_union, h.sUnion_eq], ?_⟩
· rintro t₁ (rfl | h₁) t₂ (rfl | h₂) x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
· cases hx₁
· cases hx₁
· cases hx₂
· obtain ⟨t₃, h₃, hs⟩ := h.exists_subset_inter _ h₁ _ h₂ x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact ⟨t₃, .inr h₃, hs⟩
· rw [h.eq_generateFrom]
refine le_antisymm (le_generateFrom fun t => ?_) (generateFrom_anti <| subset_insert ∅ s)
rintro (rfl | ht)
· exact @isOpen_empty _ (generateFrom s)
· exact .basic t ht
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.insert_empty TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.insert_empty
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty {s : Set (Set α)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis s) :
IsTopologicalBasis (s \ {∅}) := by
refine ⟨?_, by rw [sUnion_diff_singleton_empty, h.sUnion_eq], ?_⟩
· rintro t₁ ⟨h₁, -⟩ t₂ ⟨h₂, -⟩ x hx
obtain ⟨t₃, h₃, hs⟩ := h.exists_subset_inter _ h₁ _ h₂ x hx
exact ⟨t₃, ⟨h₃, Nonempty.ne_empty ⟨x, hs.1⟩⟩, hs⟩
· rw [h.eq_generateFrom]
refine le_antisymm (generateFrom_anti diff_subset) (le_generateFrom fun t ht => ?_)
obtain rfl | he := eq_or_ne t ∅
· exact @isOpen_empty _ (generateFrom _)
· exact .basic t ⟨ht, he⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.diff_empty TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.diff_empty
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : t = generateFrom s) :
IsTopologicalBasis ((fun f => ⋂₀ f) '' { f : Set (Set α) | f.Finite ∧ f ⊆ s }) := by
subst t; letI := generateFrom s
refine ⟨?_, ?_, le_antisymm (le_generateFrom ?_) <| generateFrom_anti fun t ht => ?_⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t₁, ⟨hft₁, ht₁b⟩, rfl⟩ _ ⟨t₂, ⟨hft₂, ht₂b⟩, rfl⟩ x h
exact ⟨_, ⟨_, ⟨hft₁.union hft₂, union_subset ht₁b ht₂b⟩, sInter_union t₁ t₂⟩, h, Subset.rfl⟩
· rw [sUnion_image, iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff]
exact fun x => ⟨∅, ⟨finite_empty, empty_subset _⟩, sInter_empty.substr <| mem_univ x⟩
· rintro _ ⟨t, ⟨hft, htb⟩, rfl⟩
exact hft.isOpen_sInter fun s hs ↦ GenerateOpen.basic _ <| htb hs
· rw [← sInter_singleton t]
exact ⟨{t}, ⟨finite_singleton t, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩, rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_subbasis TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_subbasis
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.of_hasBasis_nhds {s : Set (Set α)}
(h_nhds : ∀ a, (𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t ↦ t ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t) id) : IsTopologicalBasis s where
exists_subset_inter t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ x hx := by
simpa only [and_assoc, (h_nhds x).mem_iff]
using (inter_mem ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₁, hx.1⟩) ((h_nhds _).mem_of_mem ⟨ht₂, hx.2⟩))
sUnion_eq := sUnion_eq_univ_iff.2 fun x ↦ (h_nhds x).ex_mem
eq_generateFrom := ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
simpa only [nhds_generateFrom, and_comm] using (h_nhds x).eq_biInf
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds {s : Set (Set α)} (h_open : ∀ u ∈ s, IsOpen u)
(h_nhds : ∀ (a : α) (u : Set α), a ∈ u → IsOpen u → ∃ v ∈ s, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u) :
IsTopologicalBasis s :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds <| fun a ↦
(nhds_basis_opens a).to_hasBasis' (by simpa [and_assoc] using h_nhds a)
fun t ⟨hts, hat⟩ ↦ (h_open _ hts).mem_nhds hat
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_open_of_nhds TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) : s ∈ 𝓝 a ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by
change s ∈ (𝓝 a).sets ↔ ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom, nhds_generateFrom, biInf_sets_eq]
· simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
· rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩ := hb.1 _ hs₂ _ ht₂ _ ⟨hs₁, ht₁⟩
exact ⟨u, ⟨hu₂, hu₁⟩, le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_left),
le_principal_iff.2 (hu₃.trans inter_subset_right)⟩
· rcases eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb.sUnion_eq a with ⟨i, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨i, h2, h1⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_nhds_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ b, a ∈ t ∧ t ⊆ s := by simp [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, hb.mem_nhds_iff]
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {a : α} :
(𝓝 a).HasBasis (fun t : Set α => t ∈ b ∧ a ∈ t) fun t => t :=
⟨fun s => hb.mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [and_assoc]⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.nhds_has_basis TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.nhds_hasBasis
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) : IsOpen s := by
rw [hb.eq_generateFrom]
exact .basic s hs
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpen
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} {b : Set (Set α)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (hs : s ∈ b) (ha : a ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
(hb.isOpen hs).mem_nhds ha
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_nhds TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_nhds
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b)
{a : α} {u : Set α} (au : a ∈ u) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ b, a ∈ v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
hb.mem_nhds_iff.1 <| IsOpen.mem_nhds ou au
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_subset_of_mem_open TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_subset_of_mem_open
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion' {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : u = ⋃₀ { s ∈ B | s ⊆ u } :=
ext fun _a =>
⟨fun ha =>
let ⟨b, hb, ab, bu⟩ := hB.exists_subset_of_mem_open ha ou
⟨b, ⟨hb, bu⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_b, ⟨_, bu⟩, ab⟩ => bu ab⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion' TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion'
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨{ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }, fun _ h => h.1, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_sUnion TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_sUnion
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} : IsOpen u ↔ ∃ S ⊆ B, u = ⋃₀ S :=
⟨hB.open_eq_sUnion, fun ⟨_S, hSB, hu⟩ => hu.symm ▸ isOpen_sUnion fun _s hs => hB.isOpen (hSB hs)⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_iff_eq_sUnion TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_iff_eq_sUnion
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion {B : Set (Set α)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {u : Set α}
(ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ (β : Type u) (f : β → Set α), (u = ⋃ i, f i) ∧ ∀ i, f i ∈ B :=
⟨↥({ s ∈ B | s ⊆ u }), (↑), by
rw [← sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply hB.open_eq_sUnion' ou, fun s => And.left s.2⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.open_eq_Union TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.open_eq_iUnion
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.subset_of_forall_subset {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t) : s ⊆ t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs]; simpa [sUnion_subset_iff]
lemma IsTopologicalBasis.eq_of_forall_subset_iff {t : Set α} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B)
(hs : IsOpen s) (ht : IsOpen t) (h : ∀ U ∈ B, U ⊆ s ↔ U ⊆ t) : s = t := by
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' hs, hB.open_eq_sUnion' ht]
exact congr_arg _ (Set.ext fun U ↦ and_congr_right <| h _)
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α}
{a : α} : a ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, a ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' hb.nhds_hasBasis).trans <| by simp only [and_imp]
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.mem_closure_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.mem_closure_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff {b : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {s : Set α} :
Dense s ↔ ∀ o ∈ b, Set.Nonempty o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp only [Dense, hb.mem_closure_iff]
exact ⟨fun h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩ => h a o hb ha, fun h a o hb ha => h o hb ⟨a, ha⟩⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.dense_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.dense_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set α)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} : IsOpenMap f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun H o ho => H _ (hB.isOpen ho), fun hf o ho => ?_⟩
rw [hB.open_eq_sUnion' ho, sUnion_eq_iUnion, image_iUnion]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun s => hf s s.2.1
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.is_open_map_iff TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.isOpenMap_iff
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset {B : Set (Set α)} (hb : IsTopologicalBasis B)
{u : Set α} (hu : u.Nonempty) (ou : IsOpen u) : ∃ v ∈ B, Set.Nonempty v ∧ v ⊆ u :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hu
let ⟨v, vB, xv, vu⟩ := hb.exists_subset_of_mem_open hx ou
⟨v, vB, ⟨x, xv⟩, vu⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_nonempty_subset TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_nonempty_subset
theorem isTopologicalBasis_opens : IsTopologicalBasis { U : Set α | IsOpen U } :=
isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (by tauto) (by tauto)
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_opens TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_opens
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inducing {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {T : Set (Set β)}
(hf : Inducing f) (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) : IsTopologicalBasis ((preimage f) '' T) :=
.of_hasBasis_nhds fun a ↦ by
convert (hf.basis_nhds (h.nhds_hasBasis (a := f a))).to_image_id with s
aesop
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.inducing TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inducing
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.induced [s : TopologicalSpace β] (f : α → β)
{T : Set (Set β)} (h : IsTopologicalBasis T) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f s) ((preimage f) '' T) :=
h.inducing (t := induced f s) (inducing_induced f)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace β} {B₁ B₂ : Set (Set β)}
(h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁) B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₂) B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := t₁ ⊓ t₂) (image2 (· ∩ ·) B₁ B₂) := by
refine .of_hasBasis_nhds (t := ?_) fun a ↦ ?_
rw [nhds_inf (t₁ := t₁)]
convert ((h₁.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₁)).inf (h₂.nhds_hasBasis (t := t₂))).to_image_id
aesop
theorem IsTopologicalBasis.inf_induced {γ} [s : TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) (f₁ : γ → α)
(f₂ : γ → β) :
IsTopologicalBasis (t := induced f₁ t ⊓ induced f₂ s) (image2 (f₁ ⁻¹' · ∩ f₂ ⁻¹' ·) B₁ B₂) := by
simpa only [image2_image_left, image2_image_right] using (h₁.induced f₁).inf (h₂.induced f₂)
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.prod {β} [TopologicalSpace β] {B₁ : Set (Set α)}
{B₂ : Set (Set β)} (h₁ : IsTopologicalBasis B₁) (h₂ : IsTopologicalBasis B₂) :
IsTopologicalBasis (image2 (· ×ˢ ·) B₁ B₂) :=
h₁.inf_induced h₂ Prod.fst Prod.snd
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.prod TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.prod
theorem isTopologicalBasis_of_cover {ι} {U : ι → Set α} (Uo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i))
(Uc : ⋃ i, U i = univ) {b : ∀ i, Set (Set (U i))} (hb : ∀ i, IsTopologicalBasis (b i)) :
IsTopologicalBasis (⋃ i : ι, image ((↑) : U i → α) '' b i) := by
refine isTopologicalBasis_of_isOpen_of_nhds (fun u hu => ?_) ?_
· simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image] at hu
rcases hu with ⟨i, s, sb, rfl⟩
exact (Uo i).isOpenMap_subtype_val _ ((hb i).isOpen sb)
· intro a u ha uo
rcases iUnion_eq_univ_iff.1 Uc a with ⟨i, hi⟩
lift a to ↥(U i) using hi
rcases (hb i).exists_subset_of_mem_open ha (uo.preimage continuous_subtype_val) with
⟨v, hvb, hav, hvu⟩
exact ⟨(↑) '' v, mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, mem_image_of_mem _ hvb⟩, mem_image_of_mem _ hav,
image_subset_iff.2 hvu⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis_of_cover TopologicalSpace.isTopologicalBasis_of_cover
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous_iff {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{B : Set (Set β)} (hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) {f : α → β} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [hB.eq_generateFrom, continuous_generateFrom_iff]
@[deprecated]
protected theorem IsTopologicalBasis.continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {B : Set (Set β)}
(hB : IsTopologicalBasis B) (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ s ∈ B, IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s)) : Continuous f :=
hB.continuous_iff.2 hf
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.continuous TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.continuous
variable (α)
@[mk_iff] class SeparableSpace : Prop where
exists_countable_dense : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s
#align topological_space.separable_space TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace
theorem exists_countable_dense [SeparableSpace α] : ∃ s : Set α, s.Countable ∧ Dense s :=
SeparableSpace.exists_countable_dense
#align topological_space.exists_countable_dense TopologicalSpace.exists_countable_dense
theorem exists_dense_seq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ∃ u : ℕ → α, DenseRange u := by
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
cases' Set.countable_iff_exists_subset_range.mp hs with u hu
exact ⟨u, s_dense.mono hu⟩
#align topological_space.exists_dense_seq TopologicalSpace.exists_dense_seq
def denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : ℕ → α :=
Classical.choose (exists_dense_seq α)
#align topological_space.dense_seq TopologicalSpace.denseSeq
@[simp]
theorem denseRange_denseSeq [SeparableSpace α] [Nonempty α] : DenseRange (denseSeq α) :=
Classical.choose_spec (exists_dense_seq α)
#align topological_space.dense_range_dense_seq TopologicalSpace.denseRange_denseSeq
variable {α}
instance (priority := 100) Countable.to_separableSpace [Countable α] : SeparableSpace α where
exists_countable_dense := ⟨Set.univ, Set.countable_univ, dense_univ⟩
#align topological_space.countable.to_separable_space TopologicalSpace.Countable.to_separableSpace
theorem SeparableSpace.of_denseRange {ι : Sort _} [Countable ι] (u : ι → α) (hu : DenseRange u) :
SeparableSpace α :=
⟨⟨range u, countable_range u, hu⟩⟩
#align topological_space.separable_space_of_dense_range TopologicalSpace.SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
alias _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace' := SeparableSpace.of_denseRange
protected theorem _root_.DenseRange.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{f : α → β} (h : DenseRange f) (h' : Continuous f) : SeparableSpace β :=
let ⟨s, s_cnt, s_dense⟩ := exists_countable_dense α
⟨⟨f '' s, Countable.image s_cnt f, h.dense_image h' s_dense⟩⟩
#align dense_range.separable_space DenseRange.separableSpace
theorem _root_.QuotientMap.separableSpace [SeparableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : QuotientMap f) : SeparableSpace β :=
hf.surjective.denseRange.separableSpace hf.continuous
instance [TopologicalSpace β] [SeparableSpace α] [SeparableSpace β] : SeparableSpace (α × β) := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨s, hsc, hsd⟩
rcases exists_countable_dense β with ⟨t, htc, htd⟩
exact ⟨⟨s ×ˢ t, hsc.prod htc, hsd.prod htd⟩⟩
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, SeparableSpace (X i)]
[Countable ι] : SeparableSpace (∀ i, X i) := by
choose t htc htd using (exists_countable_dense <| X ·)
haveI := fun i ↦ (htc i).to_subtype
nontriviality ∀ i, X i; inhabit ∀ i, X i
classical
set f : (Σ I : Finset ι, ∀ i : I, t i) → ∀ i, X i := fun ⟨I, g⟩ i ↦
if hi : i ∈ I then g ⟨i, hi⟩ else (default : ∀ i, X i) i
refine ⟨⟨range f, countable_range f, dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU ⟨g, hg⟩ ↦ ?_⟩⟩
rcases isOpen_pi_iff.1 hU g hg with ⟨I, u, huo, huU⟩
have : ∀ i : I, ∃ y ∈ t i, y ∈ u i := fun i ↦
(htd i).exists_mem_open (huo i i.2).1 ⟨_, (huo i i.2).2⟩
choose y hyt hyu using this
lift y to ∀ i : I, t i using hyt
refine ⟨f ⟨I, y⟩, huU fun i (hi : i ∈ I) ↦ ?_, mem_range_self _⟩
simp only [f, dif_pos hi]
exact hyu _
instance [SeparableSpace α] {r : α → α → Prop} : SeparableSpace (Quot r) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
instance [SeparableSpace α] {s : Setoid α} : SeparableSpace (Quotient s) :=
quotientMap_quot_mk.separableSpace
theorem separableSpace_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology α] : SeparableSpace α ↔ Countable α := by
simp [separableSpace_iff, countable_univ_iff]
theorem _root_.Pairwise.countable_of_isOpen_disjoint [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} (hd : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i, (s i).Nonempty) : Countable ι := by
rcases exists_countable_dense α with ⟨u, u_countable, u_dense⟩
choose f hfu hfs using fun i ↦ u_dense.exists_mem_open (ho i) (hne i)
have f_inj : Injective f := fun i j hij ↦
hd.eq <| not_disjoint_iff.2 ⟨f i, hfs i, hij.symm ▸ hfs j⟩
have := u_countable.to_subtype
exact (f_inj.codRestrict hfu).countable
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s) (ho : ∀ i ∈ a, IsOpen (s i))
(hne : ∀ i ∈ a, (s i).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.subtype _ _).countable_of_isOpen_disjoint (Subtype.forall.2 ho) (Subtype.forall.2 hne)
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.countable_of_is_open Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_isOpen
theorem _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior [SeparableSpace α] {ι : Type*}
{s : ι → Set α} {a : Set ι} (h : a.PairwiseDisjoint s)
(ha : ∀ i ∈ a, (interior (s i)).Nonempty) : a.Countable :=
(h.mono fun _ => interior_subset).countable_of_isOpen (fun _ _ => isOpen_interior) ha
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior Set.PairwiseDisjoint.countable_of_nonempty_interior
def IsSeparable (s : Set α) :=
∃ c : Set α, c.Countable ∧ s ⊆ closure c
#align topological_space.is_separable TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable
theorem IsSeparable.mono {s u : Set α} (hs : IsSeparable s) (hu : u ⊆ s) : IsSeparable u := by
rcases hs with ⟨c, c_count, hs⟩
exact ⟨c, c_count, hu.trans hs⟩
#align topological_space.is_separable.mono TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable.mono
| Mathlib/Topology/Bases.lean | 459 | 463 | theorem IsSeparable.iUnion {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, IsSeparable (s i)) : IsSeparable (⋃ i, s i) := by |
choose c hc h'c using hs
refine ⟨⋃ i, c i, countable_iUnion hc, iUnion_subset_iff.2 fun i => ?_⟩
exact (h'c i).trans (closure_mono (subset_iUnion _ i))
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorial.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Basic
#align_import data.nat.choose.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f3994e1b117b1e1da49bcfb67334f33460c3ce4"
open Nat
namespace Nat
def choose : ℕ → ℕ → ℕ
| _, 0 => 1
| 0, _ + 1 => 0
| n + 1, k + 1 => choose n k + choose n (k + 1)
#align nat.choose Nat.choose
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 0 = 1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_right Nat.choose_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem choose_zero_succ (k : ℕ) : choose 0 (succ k) = 0 :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_zero_succ Nat.choose_zero_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ (n k : ℕ) : choose (succ n) (succ k) = choose n k + choose n (succ k) :=
rfl
#align nat.choose_succ_succ Nat.choose_succ_succ
theorem choose_succ_succ' (n k : ℕ) : choose (n + 1) (k + 1) = choose n k + choose n (k + 1) :=
rfl
theorem choose_eq_zero_of_lt : ∀ {n k}, n < k → choose n k = 0
| _, 0, hk => absurd hk (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
| 0, k + 1, _ => choose_zero_succ _
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => by
have hnk : n < k := lt_of_succ_lt_succ hk
have hnk1 : n < k + 1 := lt_of_succ_lt hk
rw [choose_succ_succ, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk, choose_eq_zero_of_lt hnk1]
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem choose_self (n : ℕ) : choose n n = 1 := by
induction n <;> simp [*, choose, choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)]
#align nat.choose_self Nat.choose_self
@[simp]
theorem choose_succ_self (n : ℕ) : choose n (succ n) = 0 :=
choose_eq_zero_of_lt (lt_succ_self _)
#align nat.choose_succ_self Nat.choose_succ_self
@[simp]
lemma choose_one_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 1 = n := by induction n <;> simp [*, choose, Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_one_right Nat.choose_one_right
-- The `n+1`-st triangle number is `n` more than the `n`-th triangle number
theorem triangle_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * (n + 1 - 1) / 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 + n := by
rw [← add_mul_div_left, Nat.mul_comm 2 n, ← Nat.mul_add, Nat.add_sub_cancel, Nat.mul_comm]
cases n <;> rfl; apply zero_lt_succ
#align nat.triangle_succ Nat.triangle_succ
theorem choose_two_right (n : ℕ) : choose n 2 = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [triangle_succ n, choose, ih]
simp [Nat.add_comm]
#align nat.choose_two_right Nat.choose_two_right
theorem choose_pos : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → 0 < choose n k
| 0, _, hk => by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]; decide
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, k + 1, hk => Nat.add_pos_left (choose_pos (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)) _
#align nat.choose_pos Nat.choose_pos
theorem choose_eq_zero_iff {n k : ℕ} : n.choose k = 0 ↔ n < k :=
⟨fun h => lt_of_not_ge (mt Nat.choose_pos h.symm.not_lt), Nat.choose_eq_zero_of_lt⟩
#align nat.choose_eq_zero_iff Nat.choose_eq_zero_iff
theorem succ_mul_choose_eq : ∀ n k, succ n * choose n k = choose (succ n) (succ k) * succ k
| 0, 0 => by decide
| 0, k + 1 => by simp [choose]
| n + 1, 0 => by simp [choose, mul_succ, succ_eq_add_one, Nat.add_comm]
| n + 1, k + 1 => by
rw [choose_succ_succ (succ n) (succ k), Nat.add_mul, ← succ_mul_choose_eq n, mul_succ, ←
succ_mul_choose_eq n, Nat.add_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_add, ← choose_succ_succ, ← succ_mul]
#align nat.succ_mul_choose_eq Nat.succ_mul_choose_eq
theorem choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial : ∀ {n k}, k ≤ n → choose n k * k ! * (n - k)! = n !
| 0, _, hk => by simp [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero hk]
| n + 1, 0, _ => by simp
| n + 1, succ k, hk => by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le hk with hk₁ | hk₁
· have h : choose n k * k.succ ! * (n - k)! = (k + 1) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₁ : (n - k)! = (n - k) * (n - k.succ)! := by
rw [← succ_sub_succ, succ_sub (le_of_lt_succ hk₁), factorial_succ]
have h₂ : choose n (succ k) * k.succ ! * ((n - k) * (n - k.succ)!) = (n - k) * n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (le_of_lt_succ hk₁)]
simp [factorial_succ, Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_left_comm, Nat.mul_assoc]
have h₃ : k * n ! ≤ n * n ! := Nat.mul_le_mul_right _ (le_of_succ_le_succ hk)
rw [choose_succ_succ, Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_mul, succ_sub_succ, h, h₁, h₂, Nat.add_mul,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, factorial_succ, ← Nat.add_sub_assoc h₃, Nat.add_assoc,
← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, Nat.add_comm]
· rw [hk₁]; simp [hk₁, Nat.mul_comm, choose, Nat.sub_self]
#align nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial
theorem choose_mul {n k s : ℕ} (hkn : k ≤ n) (hsk : s ≤ k) :
n.choose k * k.choose s = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) :=
have h : 0 < (n - k)! * (k - s)! * s ! := by apply_rules [factorial_pos, Nat.mul_pos]
Nat.mul_right_cancel h <|
calc
n.choose k * k.choose s * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) =
n.choose k * (k.choose s * s ! * (k - s)!) * (n - k)! := by
rw [Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_assoc _ s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (n - k)!, Nat.mul_comm s !]
_ = n ! := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hsk, choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hkn]
_ = n.choose s * s ! * ((n - s).choose (k - s) * (k - s)! * (n - s - (k - s))!) := by
rw [choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.sub_le_sub_right hkn _),
choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (hsk.trans hkn)]
_ = n.choose s * (n - s).choose (k - s) * ((n - k)! * (k - s)! * s !) := by
rw [Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right hsk, Nat.mul_assoc, Nat.mul_left_comm s !, Nat.mul_assoc,
Nat.mul_comm (k - s)!, Nat.mul_comm s !, Nat.mul_right_comm, ← Nat.mul_assoc]
#align nat.choose_mul Nat.choose_mul
theorem choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) :
choose n k = n ! / (k ! * (n - k)!) := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]
exact (mul_div_left _ (Nat.mul_pos (factorial_pos _) (factorial_pos _))).symm
#align nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial Nat.choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial
theorem add_choose (i j : ℕ) : (i + j).choose j = (i + j)! / (i ! * j !) := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.le_add_left j i), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.add_choose Nat.add_choose
theorem add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (i j : ℕ) :
(i + j).choose j * i ! * j ! = (i + j)! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_add_left _ _), Nat.add_sub_cancel_right,
Nat.mul_right_comm]
#align nat.add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial Nat.add_choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : k ! * (n - k)! ∣ n ! := by
rw [← choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial hk, Nat.mul_assoc]; exact Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _
#align nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial Nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial
theorem factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add (i j : ℕ) : i ! * j ! ∣ (i + j)! := by
suffices i ! * (i + j - i) ! ∣ (i + j)! by
rwa [Nat.add_sub_cancel_left i j] at this
exact factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
#align nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add Nat.factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add
@[simp]
theorem choose_symm {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ n) : choose n (n - k) = choose n k := by
rw [choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial hk, choose_eq_factorial_div_factorial (Nat.sub_le _ _),
Nat.sub_sub_self hk, Nat.mul_comm]
#align nat.choose_symm Nat.choose_symm
theorem choose_symm_of_eq_add {n a b : ℕ} (h : n = a + b) : Nat.choose n a = Nat.choose n b := by
suffices choose n (n - b) = choose n b by
rw [h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right] at this; rwa [h]
exact choose_symm (h ▸ le_add_left _ _)
#align nat.choose_symm_of_eq_add Nat.choose_symm_of_eq_add
theorem choose_symm_add {a b : ℕ} : choose (a + b) a = choose (a + b) b :=
choose_symm_of_eq_add rfl
#align nat.choose_symm_add Nat.choose_symm_add
theorem choose_symm_half (m : ℕ) : choose (2 * m + 1) (m + 1) = choose (2 * m + 1) m := by
apply choose_symm_of_eq_add
rw [Nat.add_comm m 1, Nat.add_assoc 1 m m, Nat.add_comm (2 * m) 1, Nat.two_mul m]
#align nat.choose_symm_half Nat.choose_symm_half
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Choose/Basic.lean | 212 | 215 | theorem choose_succ_right_eq (n k : ℕ) : choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) = choose n k * (n - k) := by |
have e : (n + 1) * choose n k = choose n (k + 1) * (k + 1) + choose n k * (k + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.add_mul, Nat.add_comm (choose _ _), ← choose_succ_succ, succ_mul_choose_eq]
rw [← Nat.sub_eq_of_eq_add e, Nat.mul_comm, ← Nat.mul_sub_left_distrib, Nat.add_sub_add_right]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.midpoint from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
section
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*} [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
def midpoint (x y : P) : P :=
lineMap x y (⅟ 2 : R)
#align midpoint midpoint
variable {R} {x y z : P}
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.map_midpoint (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_map.map_midpoint AffineMap.map_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.map_midpoint (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
#align affine_equiv.map_midpoint AffineEquiv.map_midpoint
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_left AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem midpoint_comm (x y : P) : midpoint R x y = midpoint R y x := by
rw [midpoint, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub, one_sub_invOf_two, midpoint]
#align midpoint_comm midpoint_comm
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
#align affine_equiv.point_reflection_midpoint_right AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right
@[simp] -- Porting note: added variant with `Equiv.pointReflection` for `simp`
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
theorem midpoint_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₃ p₄ = midpoint R (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
lineMap_vsub_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_midpoint midpoint_vsub_midpoint
theorem midpoint_vadd_midpoint (v v' : V) (p p' : P) :
midpoint R v v' +ᵥ midpoint R p p' = midpoint R (v +ᵥ p) (v' +ᵥ p') :=
lineMap_vadd_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
#align midpoint_vadd_midpoint midpoint_vadd_midpoint
theorem midpoint_eq_iff {x y z : P} : midpoint R x y = z ↔ pointReflection R z x = y :=
eq_comm.trans
((injective_pointReflection_left_of_module R x).eq_iff'
(AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left x y)).symm
#align midpoint_eq_iff midpoint_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_left (x y : P) :
midpoint R (Equiv.pointReflection x y) y = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 <| Equiv.pointReflection_involutive _ _
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_right (x y : P) :
midpoint R y (Equiv.pointReflection x y) = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) :=
lineMap_vsub_left _ _ _
#align midpoint_vsub_left midpoint_vsub_left
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_vsub_left]
#align midpoint_vsub_right midpoint_vsub_right
@[simp]
theorem left_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) :=
left_vsub_lineMap _ _ _
#align left_vsub_midpoint left_vsub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem right_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, left_vsub_midpoint]
#align right_vsub_midpoint right_vsub_midpoint
theorem midpoint_vsub (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p) := by
rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p p₂, smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, ← smul_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_assoc, invOf_two_smul_add_invOf_two_smul, ← vadd_vsub_assoc,
midpoint_comm, midpoint, lineMap_apply]
#align midpoint_vsub midpoint_vsub
theorem vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
p -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₁) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, midpoint_vsub, neg_add, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
#align vsub_midpoint vsub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_left (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
midpoint_vsub_left v₁ v₂
#align midpoint_sub_left midpoint_sub_left
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_right (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
midpoint_vsub_right v₁ v₂
#align midpoint_sub_right midpoint_sub_right
@[simp]
theorem left_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₁ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
left_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
#align left_sub_midpoint left_sub_midpoint
@[simp]
theorem right_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₂ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
right_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
#align right_sub_midpoint right_sub_midpoint
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_eq_left_iff {x y : P} : midpoint R x y = x ↔ x = y := by
rw [midpoint_eq_iff, pointReflection_self]
#align midpoint_eq_left_iff midpoint_eq_left_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Midpoint.lean | 174 | 175 | theorem left_eq_midpoint_iff {x y : P} : x = midpoint R x y ↔ x = y := by |
rw [eq_comm, midpoint_eq_left_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
classical
refine ⟨not_imp_not.1 fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ).antisymm ?_⟩
· rw [MonovaryOn] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hgxy, hfxy⟩ := h
set τ : Perm ι := (Equiv.swap x y).trans σ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
refine (set_support_mul_subset σ <| swap x y).trans (Set.union_subset hσ fun z hz ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ := swap_apply_ne_self_iff.1 hz <;> assumption
refine ((hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hτs).trans_lt' ?_).ne
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· cases lt_irrefl _ hfxy
simp only [τ, ← s.sum_erase_add _ hx,
← (s.erase x).sum_erase_add _ (mem_erase.2 ⟨hxy.symm, hy⟩),
add_assoc, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, swap_apply_right, swap_apply_left]
refine add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun z hz ↦ ?_).le
(smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul hfxy hgxy)
simp_rw [mem_erase] at hz
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hz.2.1 hz.1]
· convert h.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul ((set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ) using 1
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, apply_inv_self]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ ¬MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
convert hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
(show { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s by simp only [set_support_inv_eq, hσ]) using 1
exact σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
have hσinv : { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := (set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ
refine (Iff.trans ?_ <| hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσinv).trans
⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· apply eq_iff_eq_cancel_right.2
rw [σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ]
congr
· convert h.comp_right σ
· rw [comp.assoc, inv_def, symm_comp_self, comp_id]
· rw [σ.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq, Set.image_perm hσ]
· convert h.comp_right σ.symm
· rw [comp.assoc, self_comp_symm, comp_id]
· rw [σ.symm.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq]
exact Set.image_perm hσinv
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ ¬MonovaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ]
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i) :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ AntivaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s :=
(hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovaryOn_toDual_right
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ↔ ¬AntivaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm,
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm hσ]
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul hσ
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul AntivaryOn.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ AntivaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s :=
(hfg.dual_right.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ).trans monovaryOn_toDual_right
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
theorem AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) < ∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) ↔ ¬AntivaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff hσ, eq_comm, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul hσ]
#align antivary_on.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff AntivaryOn.sum_smul_lt_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : Monovary f g) :
(∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i, f i • g i :=
(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _
#align monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
theorem Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : Monovary f g) :
((∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ Monovary f (g ∘ σ) := by
simp [(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : Monovary f g) :
((∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) < ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ ¬Monovary f (g ∘ σ) := by
simp [(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff Monovary.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : Monovary f g) :
(∑ i, f (σ i) • g i) ≤ ∑ i, f i • g i :=
(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _
#align monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
theorem Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : Monovary f g) :
((∑ i, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ Monovary (f ∘ σ) g := by
simp [(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff
theorem Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : Monovary f g) :
((∑ i, f (σ i) • g i) < ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ ¬Monovary (f ∘ σ) g := by
simp [(hfg.monovaryOn _).sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff Monovary.sum_comp_perm_smul_lt_sum_smul_iff
theorem Antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm (hfg : Antivary f g) :
∑ i, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i, f i • g (σ i) :=
(hfg.antivaryOn _).sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _
#align antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm Antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_smul_comp_perm
theorem Antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : Antivary f g) :
((∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ Antivary f (g ∘ σ) := by
simp [(hfg.antivaryOn _).sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff Antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem Antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff (hfg : Antivary f g) :
((∑ i, f i • g i) < ∑ i, f i • g (σ i)) ↔ ¬Antivary f (g ∘ σ) := by
simp [(hfg.antivaryOn _).sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
#align antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff Antivary.sum_smul_lt_sum_smul_comp_perm_iff
theorem Antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul (hfg : Antivary f g) :
∑ i, f i • g i ≤ ∑ i, f (σ i) • g i :=
(hfg.antivaryOn _).sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _
#align antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul Antivary.sum_smul_le_sum_comp_perm_smul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 323 | 325 | theorem Antivary.sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff (hfg : Antivary f g) :
((∑ i, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i, f i • g i) ↔ Antivary (f ∘ σ) g := by |
simp [(hfg.antivaryOn _).sum_smul_eq_sum_comp_perm_smul_iff fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _]
|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyFinite
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Classical Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets IsCompact.compl_mem_sets
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
#align is_compact.induction_on IsCompact.induction_on
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
#align is_compact.inter_right IsCompact.inter_right
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
#align is_compact.inter_left IsCompact.inter_left
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
#align is_compact.diff IsCompact.diff
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
#align is_compact_of_is_closed_subset IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
#align is_compact.image_of_continuous_on IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align is_compact.image IsCompact.image
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
#align is_compact.adherence_nhdset IsCompact.adherence_nhdset
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
#align is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
#align is_compact.ultrafilter_le_nhds IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_cover IsCompact.elim_directed_cover
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subcover IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover' IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover'
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_left IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_right IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_family_closed IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun t ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed
theorem LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) (hs : IsCompact s) : { i | (f i ∩ s).Nonempty }.Finite := by
choose U hxU hUf using hf
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x _ => hxU x with ⟨t, -, hsU⟩
refine (t.finite_toSet.biUnion fun x _ => hUf x).subset ?_
rintro i ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hsU hx.2) with ⟨c, hct, hcx⟩
exact mem_biUnion hct ⟨x, hx.1, hcx⟩
#align locally_finite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
#align is_compact.inter_Inter_nonempty IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 290 | 303 | theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by |
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
#align_import combinatorics.composition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
open List
variable {n : ℕ}
@[ext]
structure Composition (n : ℕ) where
blocks : List ℕ
blocks_pos : ∀ {i}, i ∈ blocks → 0 < i
blocks_sum : blocks.sum = n
#align composition Composition
@[ext]
structure CompositionAsSet (n : ℕ) where
boundaries : Finset (Fin n.succ)
zero_mem : (0 : Fin n.succ) ∈ boundaries
getLast_mem : Fin.last n ∈ boundaries
#align composition_as_set CompositionAsSet
instance {n : ℕ} : Inhabited (CompositionAsSet n) :=
⟨⟨Finset.univ, Finset.mem_univ _, Finset.mem_univ _⟩⟩
namespace Composition
variable (c : Composition n)
instance (n : ℕ) : ToString (Composition n) :=
⟨fun c => toString c.blocks⟩
abbrev length : ℕ :=
c.blocks.length
#align composition.length Composition.length
theorem blocks_length : c.blocks.length = c.length :=
rfl
#align composition.blocks_length Composition.blocks_length
def blocksFun : Fin c.length → ℕ := c.blocks.get
#align composition.blocks_fun Composition.blocksFun
theorem ofFn_blocksFun : ofFn c.blocksFun = c.blocks :=
ofFn_get _
#align composition.of_fn_blocks_fun Composition.ofFn_blocksFun
theorem sum_blocksFun : ∑ i, c.blocksFun i = n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← ofFn_blocksFun, sum_ofFn]
#align composition.sum_blocks_fun Composition.sum_blocksFun
theorem blocksFun_mem_blocks (i : Fin c.length) : c.blocksFun i ∈ c.blocks :=
get_mem _ _ _
#align composition.blocks_fun_mem_blocks Composition.blocksFun_mem_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks {i : ℕ} (h : i ∈ c.blocks) : 1 ≤ i :=
c.blocks_pos h
#align composition.one_le_blocks Composition.one_le_blocks
@[simp]
theorem one_le_blocks' {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks (get_mem (blocks c) i h)
#align composition.one_le_blocks' Composition.one_le_blocks'
@[simp]
theorem blocks_pos' (i : ℕ) (h : i < c.length) : 0 < c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ :=
c.one_le_blocks' h
#align composition.blocks_pos' Composition.blocks_pos'
theorem one_le_blocksFun (i : Fin c.length) : 1 ≤ c.blocksFun i :=
c.one_le_blocks (c.blocksFun_mem_blocks i)
#align composition.one_le_blocks_fun Composition.one_le_blocksFun
theorem length_le : c.length ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum]
exact length_le_sum_of_one_le _ fun i hi => c.one_le_blocks hi
#align composition.length_le Composition.length_le
theorem length_pos_of_pos (h : 0 < n) : 0 < c.length := by
apply length_pos_of_sum_pos
convert h
exact c.blocks_sum
#align composition.length_pos_of_pos Composition.length_pos_of_pos
def sizeUpTo (i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(c.blocks.take i).sum
#align composition.size_up_to Composition.sizeUpTo
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_zero : c.sizeUpTo 0 = 0 := by simp [sizeUpTo]
#align composition.size_up_to_zero Composition.sizeUpTo_zero
theorem sizeUpTo_ofLength_le (i : ℕ) (h : c.length ≤ i) : c.sizeUpTo i = n := by
dsimp [sizeUpTo]
convert c.blocks_sum
exact take_all_of_le h
#align composition.size_up_to_of_length_le Composition.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le
@[simp]
theorem sizeUpTo_length : c.sizeUpTo c.length = n :=
c.sizeUpTo_ofLength_le c.length le_rfl
#align composition.size_up_to_length Composition.sizeUpTo_length
theorem sizeUpTo_le (i : ℕ) : c.sizeUpTo i ≤ n := by
conv_rhs => rw [← c.blocks_sum, ← sum_take_add_sum_drop _ i]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
#align composition.size_up_to_le Composition.sizeUpTo_le
theorem sizeUpTo_succ {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocks.get ⟨i, h⟩ := by
simp only [sizeUpTo]
rw [sum_take_succ _ _ h]
#align composition.size_up_to_succ Composition.sizeUpTo_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_succ' (i : Fin c.length) :
c.sizeUpTo ((i : ℕ) + 1) = c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i :=
c.sizeUpTo_succ i.2
#align composition.size_up_to_succ' Composition.sizeUpTo_succ'
theorem sizeUpTo_strict_mono {i : ℕ} (h : i < c.length) : c.sizeUpTo i < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := by
rw [c.sizeUpTo_succ h]
simp
#align composition.size_up_to_strict_mono Composition.sizeUpTo_strict_mono
theorem monotone_sizeUpTo : Monotone c.sizeUpTo :=
monotone_sum_take _
#align composition.monotone_size_up_to Composition.monotone_sizeUpTo
def boundary : Fin (c.length + 1) ↪o Fin (n + 1) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono fun i => ⟨c.sizeUpTo i, Nat.lt_succ_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_le i)⟩) <|
Fin.strictMono_iff_lt_succ.2 fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => c.sizeUpTo_strict_mono hi
#align composition.boundary Composition.boundary
@[simp]
theorem boundary_zero : c.boundary 0 = 0 := by simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_zero Composition.boundary_zero
@[simp]
theorem boundary_last : c.boundary (Fin.last c.length) = Fin.last n := by
simp [boundary, Fin.ext_iff]
#align composition.boundary_last Composition.boundary_last
def boundaries : Finset (Fin (n + 1)) :=
Finset.univ.map c.boundary.toEmbedding
#align composition.boundaries Composition.boundaries
theorem card_boundaries_eq_succ_length : c.boundaries.card = c.length + 1 := by simp [boundaries]
#align composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length Composition.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length
def toCompositionAsSet : CompositionAsSet n where
boundaries := c.boundaries
zero_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨0, And.intro True.intro rfl⟩
getLast_mem := by
simp only [boundaries, Finset.mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true, Finset.mem_map]
exact ⟨Fin.last c.length, And.intro True.intro c.boundary_last⟩
#align composition.to_composition_as_set Composition.toCompositionAsSet
theorem orderEmbOfFin_boundaries :
c.boundaries.orderEmbOfFin c.card_boundaries_eq_succ_length = c.boundary := by
refine (Finset.orderEmbOfFin_unique' _ ?_).symm
exact fun i => (Finset.mem_map' _).2 (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align composition.order_emb_of_fin_boundaries Composition.orderEmbOfFin_boundaries
def embedding (i : Fin c.length) : Fin (c.blocksFun i) ↪o Fin n :=
(Fin.natAddOrderEmb <| c.sizeUpTo i).trans <| Fin.castLEOrderEmb <|
calc
c.sizeUpTo i + c.blocksFun i = c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) := (c.sizeUpTo_succ _).symm
_ ≤ c.sizeUpTo c.length := monotone_sum_take _ i.2
_ = n := c.sizeUpTo_length
#align composition.embedding Composition.embedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_embedding (i : Fin c.length) (j : Fin (c.blocksFun i)) :
(c.embedding i j : ℕ) = c.sizeUpTo i + j :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_embedding Composition.coe_embedding
theorem index_exists {j : ℕ} (h : j < n) : ∃ i : ℕ, j < c.sizeUpTo (i + 1) ∧ i < c.length := by
have n_pos : 0 < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le j) h
have : 0 < c.blocks.sum := by rwa [← c.blocks_sum] at n_pos
have length_pos : 0 < c.blocks.length := length_pos_of_sum_pos (blocks c) this
refine ⟨c.length - 1, ?_, Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt length_pos)⟩
have : c.length - 1 + 1 = c.length := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos length_pos
simp [this, h]
#align composition.index_exists Composition.index_exists
def index (j : Fin n) : Fin c.length :=
⟨Nat.find (c.index_exists j.2), (Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).2⟩
#align composition.index Composition.index
theorem lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ (j : Fin n) : (j : ℕ) < c.sizeUpTo (c.index j).succ :=
(Nat.find_spec (c.index_exists j.2)).1
#align composition.lt_size_up_to_index_succ Composition.lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ
theorem sizeUpTo_index_le (j : Fin n) : c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) ≤ j := by
by_contra H
set i := c.index j
push_neg at H
have i_pos : (0 : ℕ) < i := by
by_contra! i_pos
revert H
simp [nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 i_pos, c.sizeUpTo_zero]
let i₁ := (i : ℕ).pred
have i₁_lt_i : i₁ < i := Nat.pred_lt (ne_of_gt i_pos)
have i₁_succ : i₁ + 1 = i := Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos i_pos
have := Nat.find_min (c.index_exists j.2) i₁_lt_i
simp [lt_trans i₁_lt_i (c.index j).2, i₁_succ] at this
exact Nat.lt_le_asymm H this
#align composition.size_up_to_index_le Composition.sizeUpTo_index_le
def invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : Fin (c.blocksFun (c.index j)) :=
⟨j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j), by
rw [tsub_lt_iff_right, add_comm, ← sizeUpTo_succ']
· exact lt_sizeUpTo_index_succ _ _
· exact sizeUpTo_index_le _ _⟩
#align composition.inv_embedding Composition.invEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem coe_invEmbedding (j : Fin n) : (c.invEmbedding j : ℕ) = j - c.sizeUpTo (c.index j) :=
rfl
#align composition.coe_inv_embedding Composition.coe_invEmbedding
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Composition.lean | 357 | 359 | theorem embedding_comp_inv (j : Fin n) : c.embedding (c.index j) (c.invEmbedding j) = j := by |
rw [Fin.ext_iff]
apply add_tsub_cancel_of_le (c.sizeUpTo_index_le j)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Data.Int.NatPrime
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
#align_import number_theory.pythagorean_triples from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
theorem sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four (z : ZMod 4) : z * z ≠ 2 := by
change Fin 4 at z
fin_cases z <;> decide
#align sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four
theorem Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four (z : ℤ) : z * z % 4 ≠ 2 := by
suffices ¬z * z % (4 : ℕ) = 2 % (4 : ℕ) by exact this
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff']
simpa using sq_ne_two_fin_zmod_four _
#align int.sq_ne_two_mod_four Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
def PythagoreanTriple (x y z : ℤ) : Prop :=
x * x + y * y = z * z
#align pythagorean_triple PythagoreanTriple
theorem pythagoreanTriple_comm {x y z : ℤ} : PythagoreanTriple x y z ↔ PythagoreanTriple y x z := by
delta PythagoreanTriple
rw [add_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple_comm pythagoreanTriple_comm
theorem PythagoreanTriple.zero : PythagoreanTriple 0 0 0 := by
simp only [PythagoreanTriple, zero_mul, zero_add]
#align pythagorean_triple.zero PythagoreanTriple.zero
namespace PythagoreanTriple
variable {x y z : ℤ} (h : PythagoreanTriple x y z)
theorem eq : x * x + y * y = z * z :=
h
#align pythagorean_triple.eq PythagoreanTriple.eq
@[symm]
theorem symm : PythagoreanTriple y x z := by rwa [pythagoreanTriple_comm]
#align pythagorean_triple.symm PythagoreanTriple.symm
theorem mul (k : ℤ) : PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) :=
calc
k * x * (k * x) + k * y * (k * y) = k ^ 2 * (x * x + y * y) := by ring
_ = k ^ 2 * (z * z) := by rw [h.eq]
_ = k * z * (k * z) := by ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul PythagoreanTriple.mul
theorem mul_iff (k : ℤ) (hk : k ≠ 0) :
PythagoreanTriple (k * x) (k * y) (k * z) ↔ PythagoreanTriple x y z := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.mul k⟩
simp only [PythagoreanTriple]
intro h
rw [← mul_left_inj' (mul_ne_zero hk hk)]
convert h using 1 <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_iff PythagoreanTriple.mul_iff
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ k m n : ℤ,
(x = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧ y = k * (2 * m * n) ∨
x = k * (2 * m * n) ∧ y = k * (m ^ 2 - n ^ 2)) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsClassified
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def IsPrimitiveClassified (_ : PythagoreanTriple x y z) :=
∃ m n : ℤ,
(x = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2 ∧ y = 2 * m * n ∨ x = 2 * m * n ∧ y = m ^ 2 - n ^ 2) ∧
Int.gcd m n = 1 ∧ (m % 2 = 0 ∧ n % 2 = 1 ∨ m % 2 = 1 ∧ n % 2 = 0)
#align pythagorean_triple.is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.IsPrimitiveClassified
theorem mul_isClassified (k : ℤ) (hc : h.IsClassified) : (h.mul k).IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨l, m, n, ⟨⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, co⟩⟩ := hc
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
left
constructor <;> ring
· use k * l, m, n
apply And.intro _ co
right
constructor <;> ring
#align pythagorean_triple.mul_is_classified PythagoreanTriple.mul_isClassified
theorem even_odd_of_coprime (hc : Int.gcd x y = 1) :
x % 2 = 0 ∧ y % 2 = 1 ∨ x % 2 = 1 ∧ y % 2 = 0 := by
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one x with hx hx <;>
cases' Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one y with hy hy
-- x even, y even
· exfalso
apply Nat.not_coprime_of_dvd_of_dvd (by decide : 1 < 2) _ _ hc
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hx
· apply Int.natCast_dvd.1
apply Int.dvd_of_emod_eq_zero hy
-- x even, y odd
· left
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y even
· right
exact ⟨hx, hy⟩
-- x odd, y odd
· exfalso
obtain ⟨x0, y0, rfl, rfl⟩ : ∃ x0 y0, x = x0 * 2 + 1 ∧ y = y0 * 2 + 1 := by
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hx) with x0 hx2
cases' exists_eq_mul_left_of_dvd (Int.dvd_sub_of_emod_eq hy) with y0 hy2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hx2 hy2
exact ⟨x0, y0, hx2, hy2⟩
apply Int.sq_ne_two_mod_four z
rw [show z * z = 4 * (x0 * x0 + x0 + y0 * y0 + y0) + 2 by
rw [← h.eq]
ring]
simp only [Int.add_emod, Int.mul_emod_right, zero_add]
decide
#align pythagorean_triple.even_odd_of_coprime PythagoreanTriple.even_odd_of_coprime
theorem gcd_dvd : (Int.gcd x y : ℤ) ∣ z := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hz, dvd_zero]
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, _, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul]
rw [← Int.pow_dvd_pow_iff two_ne_zero, sq z, ← h.eq]
rw [(by ring : x0 * k * (x0 * k) + y0 * k * (y0 * k) = (k : ℤ) ^ 2 * (x0 * x0 + y0 * y0))]
exact dvd_mul_right _ _
#align pythagorean_triple.gcd_dvd PythagoreanTriple.gcd_dvd
theorem normalize : PythagoreanTriple (x / Int.gcd x y) (y / Int.gcd x y) (z / Int.gcd x y) := by
by_cases h0 : Int.gcd x y = 0
· have hx : x = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left h0
have hy : y = 0 := by
apply Int.natAbs_eq_zero.mp
apply Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right h0
have hz : z = 0 := by
simpa only [PythagoreanTriple, hx, hy, add_zero, zero_eq_mul, mul_zero,
or_self_iff] using h
simp only [hx, hy, hz, Int.zero_div]
exact zero
rcases h.gcd_dvd with ⟨z0, rfl⟩
obtain ⟨k, x0, y0, k0, h2, rfl, rfl⟩ :
∃ (k : ℕ) (x0 y0 : _), 0 < k ∧ Int.gcd x0 y0 = 1 ∧ x = x0 * k ∧ y = y0 * k :=
Int.exists_gcd_one' (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h0)
have hk : (k : ℤ) ≠ 0 := by
norm_cast
rwa [pos_iff_ne_zero] at k0
rw [Int.gcd_mul_right, h2, Int.natAbs_ofNat, one_mul] at h ⊢
rw [mul_comm x0, mul_comm y0, mul_iff k hk] at h
rwa [Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel _ hk, Int.mul_ediv_cancel_left _ hk]
#align pythagorean_triple.normalize PythagoreanTriple.normalize
theorem isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified (hp : h.IsPrimitiveClassified) : h.IsClassified := by
obtain ⟨m, n, H⟩ := hp
use 1, m, n
rcases H with ⟨t, co, _⟩
rw [one_mul, one_mul]
exact ⟨t, co⟩
#align pythagorean_triple.is_classified_of_is_primitive_classified PythagoreanTriple.isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/PythagoreanTriples.lean | 218 | 225 | theorem isClassified_of_normalize_isPrimitiveClassified (hc : h.normalize.IsPrimitiveClassified) :
h.IsClassified := by |
convert h.normalize.mul_isClassified (Int.gcd x y)
(isClassified_of_isPrimitiveClassified h.normalize hc) <;>
rw [Int.mul_ediv_cancel']
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_left
· exact Int.gcd_dvd_right
· exact h.gcd_dvd
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Basic
#align_import analysis.box_integral.partition.split from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Filter
open Function Set Filter
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι M : Type*} {n : ℕ}
namespace Box
variable {I : Box ι} {i : ι} {x : ℝ} {y : ι → ℝ}
def splitLower (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' I.lower (update I.upper i (min x (I.upper i)))
#align box_integral.box.split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower
@[simp]
theorem coe_splitLower : (splitLower I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | y i ≤ x } := by
rw [splitLower, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and, ← Pi.le_def,
le_update_iff, le_min_iff, and_assoc, and_forall_ne (p := fun j => y j ≤ upper I j) i, mem_def]
rw [and_comm (a := y i ≤ x)]
#align box_integral.box.coe_split_lower BoxIntegral.Box.coe_splitLower
theorem splitLower_le : I.splitLower i x ≤ I :=
withBotCoe_subset_iff.1 <| by simp
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_le BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_le
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_bot {i x} : I.splitLower i x = ⊥ ↔ x ≤ I.lower i := by
rw [splitLower, mk'_eq_bot, exists_update_iff I.upper fun j y => y ≤ I.lower j]
simp [(I.lower_lt_upper _).not_le]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem splitLower_eq_self : I.splitLower i x = I ↔ I.upper i ≤ x := by
simp [splitLower, update_eq_iff]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_eq_self BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_eq_self
theorem splitLower_def [DecidableEq ι] {i x} (h : x ∈ Ioo (I.lower i) (I.upper i))
(h' : ∀ j, I.lower j < update I.upper i x j :=
(forall_update_iff I.upper fun j y => I.lower j < y).2
⟨h.1, fun j _ => I.lower_lt_upper _⟩) :
I.splitLower i x = (⟨I.lower, update I.upper i x, h'⟩ : Box ι) := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [splitLower, mk'_eq_coe, min_eq_left h.2.le,
update, and_self]
#align box_integral.box.split_lower_def BoxIntegral.Box.splitLower_def
def splitUpper (I : Box ι) (i : ι) (x : ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
mk' (update I.lower i (max x (I.lower i))) I.upper
#align box_integral.box.split_upper BoxIntegral.Box.splitUpper
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Split.lean | 106 | 112 | theorem coe_splitUpper : (splitUpper I i x : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ↑I ∩ { y | x < y i } := by |
rw [splitUpper, coe_mk']
ext y
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_Ioc, mem_inter_iff, mem_coe, mem_setOf_eq, forall_and,
forall_update_iff I.lower fun j z => z < y j, max_lt_iff, and_assoc (a := x < y i),
and_forall_ne (p := fun j => lower I j < y j) i, mem_def]
exact and_comm
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.