Context stringlengths 57 85k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 2.42k | end int64 18 2.43k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
#align_import order.filter.countable_Inter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b9e46fe101fc897fb2e7edaf0bf1f09ea49eb81a"
open Set Filter
open Filter
variable {ι : Sort*} {α β : Type*}
class CountableInterFilter (l : Filter α) : Prop where
countable_sInter_mem : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋂₀ S ∈ l
#align countable_Inter_filter CountableInterFilter
variable {l : Filter α} [CountableInterFilter l]
theorem countable_sInter_mem {S : Set (Set α)} (hSc : S.Countable) : ⋂₀ S ∈ l ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l :=
⟨fun hS _s hs => mem_of_superset hS (sInter_subset_of_mem hs),
CountableInterFilter.countable_sInter_mem _ hSc⟩
#align countable_sInter_mem countable_sInter_mem
theorem countable_iInter_mem [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, s i) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ l :=
sInter_range s ▸ (countable_sInter_mem (countable_range _)).trans forall_mem_range
#align countable_Inter_mem countable_iInter_mem
theorem countable_bInter_mem {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {s : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} :
(⋂ i, ⋂ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_›) ∈ l ↔ ∀ i, ∀ hi : i ∈ S, s i ‹_› ∈ l := by
rw [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.toEncodable
exact countable_iInter_mem.trans Subtype.forall
#align countable_bInter_mem countable_bInter_mem
theorem eventually_countable_forall [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i, p x i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᶠ x in l, p x i := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using
@countable_iInter_mem _ _ l _ _ fun i => { x | p x i }
#align eventually_countable_forall eventually_countable_forall
theorem eventually_countable_ball {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
{p : α → ∀ i ∈ S, Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ i hi, p x i hi) ↔ ∀ i hi, ∀ᶠ x in l, p x i hi := by
simpa only [Filter.Eventually, setOf_forall] using
@countable_bInter_mem _ l _ _ _ hS fun i hi => { x | p x i hi }
#align eventually_countable_ball eventually_countable_ball
theorem EventuallyLE.countable_iUnion [Countable ι] {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) :
⋃ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(eventually_countable_forall.2 h).mono fun _ hst hs => mem_iUnion.2 <| (mem_iUnion.1 hs).imp hst
#align eventually_le.countable_Union EventuallyLE.countable_iUnion
theorem EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion [Countable ι] {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) :
⋃ i, s i =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.countable_iUnion fun i => (h i).le).antisymm
(EventuallyLE.countable_iUnion fun i => (h i).symm.le)
#align eventually_eq.countable_Union EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion
theorem EventuallyLE.countable_bUnion {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
{s t : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} (h : ∀ i hi, s i hi ≤ᶠ[l] t i hi) :
⋃ i ∈ S, s i ‹_› ≤ᶠ[l] ⋃ i ∈ S, t i ‹_› := by
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
haveI := hS.toEncodable
exact EventuallyLE.countable_iUnion fun i => h i i.2
#align eventually_le.countable_bUnion EventuallyLE.countable_bUnion
theorem EventuallyEq.countable_bUnion {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
{s t : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} (h : ∀ i hi, s i hi =ᶠ[l] t i hi) :
⋃ i ∈ S, s i ‹_› =ᶠ[l] ⋃ i ∈ S, t i ‹_› :=
(EventuallyLE.countable_bUnion hS fun i hi => (h i hi).le).antisymm
(EventuallyLE.countable_bUnion hS fun i hi => (h i hi).symm.le)
#align eventually_eq.countable_bUnion EventuallyEq.countable_bUnion
theorem EventuallyLE.countable_iInter [Countable ι] {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] t i) :
⋂ i, s i ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(eventually_countable_forall.2 h).mono fun _ hst hs =>
mem_iInter.2 fun i => hst _ (mem_iInter.1 hs i)
#align eventually_le.countable_Inter EventuallyLE.countable_iInter
theorem EventuallyEq.countable_iInter [Countable ι] {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i =ᶠ[l] t i) :
⋂ i, s i =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i, t i :=
(EventuallyLE.countable_iInter fun i => (h i).le).antisymm
(EventuallyLE.countable_iInter fun i => (h i).symm.le)
#align eventually_eq.countable_Inter EventuallyEq.countable_iInter
theorem EventuallyLE.countable_bInter {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
{s t : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} (h : ∀ i hi, s i hi ≤ᶠ[l] t i hi) :
⋂ i ∈ S, s i ‹_› ≤ᶠ[l] ⋂ i ∈ S, t i ‹_› := by
simp only [biInter_eq_iInter]
haveI := hS.toEncodable
exact EventuallyLE.countable_iInter fun i => h i i.2
#align eventually_le.countable_bInter EventuallyLE.countable_bInter
theorem EventuallyEq.countable_bInter {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable)
{s t : ∀ i ∈ S, Set α} (h : ∀ i hi, s i hi =ᶠ[l] t i hi) :
⋂ i ∈ S, s i ‹_› =ᶠ[l] ⋂ i ∈ S, t i ‹_› :=
(EventuallyLE.countable_bInter hS fun i hi => (h i hi).le).antisymm
(EventuallyLE.countable_bInter hS fun i hi => (h i hi).symm.le)
#align eventually_eq.countable_bInter EventuallyEq.countable_bInter
def Filter.ofCountableInter (l : Set (Set α))
(hl : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → S ⊆ l → ⋂₀ S ∈ l)
(h_mono : ∀ s t, s ∈ l → s ⊆ t → t ∈ l) : Filter α where
sets := l
univ_sets := @sInter_empty α ▸ hl _ countable_empty (empty_subset _)
sets_of_superset := h_mono _ _
inter_sets {s t} hs ht := sInter_pair s t ▸
hl _ ((countable_singleton _).insert _) (insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨hs, singleton_subset_iff.2 ht⟩)
#align filter.of_countable_Inter Filter.ofCountableInter
instance Filter.countableInter_ofCountableInter (l : Set (Set α))
(hl : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → S ⊆ l → ⋂₀ S ∈ l)
(h_mono : ∀ s t, s ∈ l → s ⊆ t → t ∈ l) :
CountableInterFilter (Filter.ofCountableInter l hl h_mono) :=
⟨hl⟩
#align filter.countable_Inter_of_countable_Inter Filter.countableInter_ofCountableInter
@[simp]
theorem Filter.mem_ofCountableInter {l : Set (Set α)}
(hl : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → S ⊆ l → ⋂₀ S ∈ l) (h_mono : ∀ s t, s ∈ l → s ⊆ t → t ∈ l)
{s : Set α} : s ∈ Filter.ofCountableInter l hl h_mono ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align filter.mem_of_countable_Inter Filter.mem_ofCountableInter
def Filter.ofCountableUnion (l : Set (Set α))
(hUnion : ∀ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, s ∈ l) → ⋃₀ S ∈ l)
(hmono : ∀ t ∈ l, ∀ s ⊆ t, s ∈ l) : Filter α := by
refine .ofCountableInter {s | sᶜ ∈ l} (fun S hSc hSp ↦ ?_) fun s t ht hsub ↦ ?_
· rw [mem_setOf_eq, compl_sInter]
apply hUnion (compl '' S) (hSc.image _)
intro s hs
rw [mem_image] at hs
rcases hs with ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
apply hSp ht
· rw [mem_setOf_eq]
rw [← compl_subset_compl] at hsub
exact hmono sᶜ ht tᶜ hsub
instance Filter.countableInter_ofCountableUnion (l : Set (Set α)) (h₁ h₂) :
CountableInterFilter (Filter.ofCountableUnion l h₁ h₂) :=
countableInter_ofCountableInter ..
@[simp]
theorem Filter.mem_ofCountableUnion {l : Set (Set α)} {hunion hmono s} :
s ∈ ofCountableUnion l hunion hmono ↔ l sᶜ :=
Iff.rfl
instance countableInterFilter_principal (s : Set α) : CountableInterFilter (𝓟 s) :=
⟨fun _ _ hS => subset_sInter hS⟩
#align countable_Inter_filter_principal countableInterFilter_principal
instance countableInterFilter_bot : CountableInterFilter (⊥ : Filter α) := by
rw [← principal_empty]
apply countableInterFilter_principal
#align countable_Inter_filter_bot countableInterFilter_bot
instance countableInterFilter_top : CountableInterFilter (⊤ : Filter α) := by
rw [← principal_univ]
apply countableInterFilter_principal
#align countable_Inter_filter_top countableInterFilter_top
instance (l : Filter β) [CountableInterFilter l] (f : α → β) :
CountableInterFilter (comap f l) := by
refine ⟨fun S hSc hS => ?_⟩
choose! t htl ht using hS
have : (⋂ s ∈ S, t s) ∈ l := (countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 htl
refine ⟨_, this, ?_⟩
simpa [preimage_iInter] using iInter₂_mono ht
instance (l : Filter α) [CountableInterFilter l] (f : α → β) : CountableInterFilter (map f l) := by
refine ⟨fun S hSc hS => ?_⟩
simp only [mem_map, sInter_eq_biInter, preimage_iInter₂] at hS ⊢
exact (countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 hS
instance countableInterFilter_inf (l₁ l₂ : Filter α) [CountableInterFilter l₁]
[CountableInterFilter l₂] : CountableInterFilter (l₁ ⊓ l₂) := by
refine ⟨fun S hSc hS => ?_⟩
choose s hs t ht hst using hS
replace hs : (⋂ i ∈ S, s i ‹_›) ∈ l₁ := (countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 hs
replace ht : (⋂ i ∈ S, t i ‹_›) ∈ l₂ := (countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 ht
refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) (subset_sInter fun i hi => ?_)
rw [hst i hi]
apply inter_subset_inter <;> exact iInter_subset_of_subset i (iInter_subset _ _)
#align countable_Inter_filter_inf countableInterFilter_inf
instance countableInterFilter_sup (l₁ l₂ : Filter α) [CountableInterFilter l₁]
[CountableInterFilter l₂] : CountableInterFilter (l₁ ⊔ l₂) := by
refine ⟨fun S hSc hS => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩ <;> refine (countable_sInter_mem hSc).2 fun s hs => ?_
exacts [(hS s hs).1, (hS s hs).2]
#align countable_Inter_filter_sup countableInterFilter_sup
namespace Filter
variable (g : Set (Set α))
inductive CountableGenerateSets : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → CountableGenerateSets s
| univ : CountableGenerateSets univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : CountableGenerateSets s → s ⊆ t → CountableGenerateSets t
| sInter {S : Set (Set α)} :
S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, CountableGenerateSets s) → CountableGenerateSets (⋂₀ S)
#align filter.countable_generate_sets Filter.CountableGenerateSets
def countableGenerate : Filter α :=
ofCountableInter (CountableGenerateSets g) (fun _ => CountableGenerateSets.sInter) fun _ _ =>
CountableGenerateSets.superset
--deriving CountableInterFilter
#align filter.countable_generate Filter.countableGenerate
-- Porting note: could not de derived
instance : CountableInterFilter (countableGenerate g) := by
delta countableGenerate; infer_instance
variable {g}
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableInter.lean | 261 | 277 | theorem mem_countableGenerate_iff {s : Set α} :
s ∈ countableGenerate g ↔ ∃ S : Set (Set α), S ⊆ g ∧ S.Countable ∧ ⋂₀ S ⊆ s := by |
constructor <;> intro h
· induction' h with s hs s t _ st ih S Sct _ ih
· exact ⟨{s}, by simp [hs, subset_refl]⟩
· exact ⟨∅, by simp⟩
· refine Exists.imp (fun S => ?_) ih
tauto
choose T Tg Tct hT using ih
refine ⟨⋃ (s) (H : s ∈ S), T s H, by simpa, Sct.biUnion Tct, ?_⟩
apply subset_sInter
intro s H
exact subset_trans (sInter_subset_sInter (subset_iUnion₂ s H)) (hT s H)
rcases h with ⟨S, Sg, Sct, hS⟩
refine mem_of_superset ((countable_sInter_mem Sct).mpr ?_) hS
intro s H
exact CountableGenerateSets.basic (Sg H)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Maps
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
#align_import topology.constructions from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7ebde7ee0d1505dfccac8644ae12371aa3c1c9f"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology TopologicalSpace Set Filter Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {Z W ε ζ : Type*}
section Constructions
instance instTopologicalSpaceSubtype {p : X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Subtype p) :=
induced (↑) t
instance {r : X → X → Prop} [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (Quot r) :=
coinduced (Quot.mk r) t
instance instTopologicalSpaceQuotient {s : Setoid X} [t : TopologicalSpace X] :
TopologicalSpace (Quotient s) :=
coinduced Quotient.mk' t
instance instTopologicalSpaceProd [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X × Y) :=
induced Prod.fst t₁ ⊓ induced Prod.snd t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSum [t₁ : TopologicalSpace X] [t₂ : TopologicalSpace Y] :
TopologicalSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
coinduced Sum.inl t₁ ⊔ coinduced Sum.inr t₂
instance instTopologicalSpaceSigma {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type v} [t₂ : ∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] :
TopologicalSpace (Sigma X) :=
⨆ i, coinduced (Sigma.mk i) (t₂ i)
instance Pi.topologicalSpace {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [t₂ : (i : ι) → TopologicalSpace (Y i)] :
TopologicalSpace ((i : ι) → Y i) :=
⨅ i, induced (fun f => f i) (t₂ i)
#align Pi.topological_space Pi.topologicalSpace
instance ULift.topologicalSpace [t : TopologicalSpace X] : TopologicalSpace (ULift.{v, u} X) :=
t.induced ULift.down
#align ulift.topological_space ULift.topologicalSpace
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : TopologicalSpace (Additive X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance : TopologicalSpace (Multiplicative X) := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Additive X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Multiplicative X) := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_ofMul : Continuous (ofMul : X → Additive X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_mul continuous_ofMul
theorem continuous_toMul : Continuous (toMul : Additive X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_mul continuous_toMul
theorem continuous_ofAdd : Continuous (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_add continuous_ofAdd
theorem continuous_toAdd : Continuous (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_add continuous_toAdd
theorem isOpenMap_ofMul : IsOpenMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_mul isOpenMap_ofMul
theorem isOpenMap_toMul : IsOpenMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_mul isOpenMap_toMul
theorem isOpenMap_ofAdd : IsOpenMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_add isOpenMap_ofAdd
theorem isOpenMap_toAdd : IsOpenMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_add isOpenMap_toAdd
theorem isClosedMap_ofMul : IsClosedMap (ofMul : X → Additive X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_mul isClosedMap_ofMul
theorem isClosedMap_toMul : IsClosedMap (toMul : Additive X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_mul isClosedMap_toMul
theorem isClosedMap_ofAdd : IsClosedMap (ofAdd : X → Multiplicative X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_add isClosedMap_ofAdd
theorem isClosedMap_toAdd : IsClosedMap (toAdd : Multiplicative X → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_add isClosedMap_toAdd
theorem nhds_ofMul (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofMul x) = map ofMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_mul nhds_ofMul
theorem nhds_ofAdd (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofAdd x) = map ofAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_add nhds_ofAdd
theorem nhds_toMul (x : Additive X) : 𝓝 (toMul x) = map toMul (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_mul nhds_toMul
theorem nhds_toAdd (x : Multiplicative X) : 𝓝 (toAdd x) = map toAdd (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_add nhds_toAdd
end
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
open OrderDual
instance : TopologicalSpace Xᵒᵈ := ‹TopologicalSpace X›
instance [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology Xᵒᵈ := ‹DiscreteTopology X›
theorem continuous_toDual : Continuous (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := continuous_id
#align continuous_to_dual continuous_toDual
theorem continuous_ofDual : Continuous (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := continuous_id
#align continuous_of_dual continuous_ofDual
theorem isOpenMap_toDual : IsOpenMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_to_dual isOpenMap_toDual
theorem isOpenMap_ofDual : IsOpenMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsOpenMap.id
#align is_open_map_of_dual isOpenMap_ofDual
theorem isClosedMap_toDual : IsClosedMap (toDual : X → Xᵒᵈ) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_to_dual isClosedMap_toDual
theorem isClosedMap_ofDual : IsClosedMap (ofDual : Xᵒᵈ → X) := IsClosedMap.id
#align is_closed_map_of_dual isClosedMap_ofDual
theorem nhds_toDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (toDual x) = map toDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_to_dual nhds_toDual
theorem nhds_ofDual (x : X) : 𝓝 (ofDual x) = map ofDual (𝓝 x) := rfl
#align nhds_of_dual nhds_ofDual
end
theorem Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds [TopologicalSpace X] [s : Setoid X] {V : Set <| Quotient s}
{x : X} (hs : V ∈ 𝓝 (Quotient.mk' x)) : Quotient.mk' ⁻¹' V ∈ 𝓝 x :=
preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
#align quotient.preimage_mem_nhds Quotient.preimage_mem_nhds
theorem Dense.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {s : Set X} (H : Dense s) :
Dense (Quotient.mk' '' s) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.dense_image continuous_coinduced_rng H
#align dense.quotient Dense.quotient
theorem DenseRange.quotient [Setoid X] [TopologicalSpace X] {f : Y → X} (hf : DenseRange f) :
DenseRange (Quotient.mk' ∘ f) :=
Quotient.surjective_Quotient_mk''.denseRange.comp hf continuous_coinduced_rng
#align dense_range.quotient DenseRange.quotient
theorem continuous_map_of_le {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t : Setoid α} (h : s ≤ t) : Continuous (Setoid.map_of_le h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
theorem continuous_map_sInf {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{S : Set (Setoid α)} {s : Setoid α} (h : s ∈ S) : Continuous (Setoid.map_sInf h) :=
continuous_coinduced_rng
instance {p : X → Prop} [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : DiscreteTopology (Subtype p) :=
⟨bot_unique fun s _ => ⟨(↑) '' s, isOpen_discrete _, preimage_image_eq _ Subtype.val_injective⟩⟩
instance Sum.discreteTopology [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [h : DiscreteTopology X]
[hY : DiscreteTopology Y] : DiscreteTopology (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨sup_eq_bot_iff.2 <| by simp [h.eq_bot, hY.eq_bot]⟩
#align sum.discrete_topology Sum.discreteTopology
instance Sigma.discreteTopology {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → Type v} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (Y i)]
[h : ∀ i, DiscreteTopology (Y i)] : DiscreteTopology (Sigma Y) :=
⟨iSup_eq_bot.2 fun _ => by simp only [(h _).eq_bot, coinduced_bot]⟩
#align sigma.discrete_topology Sigma.discreteTopology
def CofiniteTopology (X : Type*) := X
#align cofinite_topology CofiniteTopology
section Sigma
variable {ι κ : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} {τ : κ → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (σ i)]
[∀ k, TopologicalSpace (τ k)] [TopologicalSpace X]
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sigmaMk {i : ι} : Continuous (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) :=
continuous_iSup_rng continuous_coinduced_rng
#align continuous_sigma_mk continuous_sigmaMk
-- Porting note: the proof was `by simp only [isOpen_iSup_iff, isOpen_coinduced]`
theorem isOpen_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
delta instTopologicalSpaceSigma
rw [isOpen_iSup_iff]
rfl
#align is_open_sigma_iff isOpen_sigma_iff
theorem isClosed_sigma_iff {s : Set (Sigma σ)} : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ i, IsClosed (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_sigma_iff, preimage_compl]
#align is_closed_sigma_iff isClosed_sigma_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/Constructions.lean | 1,591 | 1,598 | theorem isOpenMap_sigmaMk {i : ι} : IsOpenMap (@Sigma.mk ι σ i) := by |
intro s hs
rw [isOpen_sigma_iff]
intro j
rcases eq_or_ne j i with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [preimage_image_eq _ sigma_mk_injective]
· rw [preimage_image_sigmaMk_of_ne hne]
exact isOpen_empty
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.TypeTags
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.LinearMap.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Contraction
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
#align_import representation_theory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c04bc6e93e23aa0182aba53661a2211e80b6feac"
open MonoidAlgebra (lift of)
open LinearMap
section
variable (k G V : Type*) [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
abbrev Representation :=
G →* V →ₗ[k] V
#align representation Representation
end
namespace Representation
section MonoidAlgebra
variable {k G V : Type*} [CommSemiring k] [Monoid G] [AddCommMonoid V] [Module k V]
variable (ρ : Representation k G V)
noncomputable def asAlgebraHom : MonoidAlgebra k G →ₐ[k] Module.End k V :=
(lift k G _) ρ
#align representation.as_algebra_hom Representation.asAlgebraHom
theorem asAlgebraHom_def : asAlgebraHom ρ = (lift k G _) ρ :=
rfl
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_def Representation.asAlgebraHom_def
@[simp]
theorem asAlgebraHom_single (g : G) (r : k) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g r) = r • ρ g := by
simp only [asAlgebraHom_def, MonoidAlgebra.lift_single]
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_single Representation.asAlgebraHom_single
theorem asAlgebraHom_single_one (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (Finsupp.single g 1) = ρ g := by simp
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_single_one Representation.asAlgebraHom_single_one
theorem asAlgebraHom_of (g : G) : asAlgebraHom ρ (of k G g) = ρ g := by
simp only [MonoidAlgebra.of_apply, asAlgebraHom_single, one_smul]
#align representation.as_algebra_hom_of Representation.asAlgebraHom_of
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def asModule (_ : Representation k G V) :=
V
#align representation.as_module Representation.asModule
-- Porting note: no derive handler
instance : AddCommMonoid (ρ.asModule) := inferInstanceAs <| AddCommMonoid V
instance : Inhabited ρ.asModule where
default := 0
noncomputable instance asModuleModule : Module (MonoidAlgebra k G) ρ.asModule :=
Module.compHom V (asAlgebraHom ρ).toRingHom
#align representation.as_module_module Representation.asModuleModule
-- Porting note: ρ.asModule doesn't unfold now
instance : Module k ρ.asModule := inferInstanceAs <| Module k V
def asModuleEquiv : ρ.asModule ≃+ V :=
AddEquiv.refl _
#align representation.as_module_equiv Representation.asModuleEquiv
@[simp]
theorem asModuleEquiv_map_smul (r : MonoidAlgebra k G) (x : ρ.asModule) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv (r • x) = ρ.asAlgebraHom r (ρ.asModuleEquiv x) :=
rfl
#align representation.as_module_equiv_map_smul Representation.asModuleEquiv_map_smul
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RepresentationTheory/Basic.lean | 159 | 162 | theorem asModuleEquiv_symm_map_smul (r : k) (x : V) :
ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm (r • x) = algebraMap k (MonoidAlgebra k G) r • ρ.asModuleEquiv.symm x := by |
apply_fun ρ.asModuleEquiv
simp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.ExpChar
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Content
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"da420a8c6dd5bdfb85c4ced85c34388f633bc6ff"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type*}
namespace Polynomial
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
instance instCharP (p : ℕ) [h : CharP R p] : CharP R[X] p :=
let ⟨h⟩ := h
⟨fun n => by rw [← map_natCast C, ← C_0, C_inj, h]⟩
instance instExpChar (p : ℕ) [h : ExpChar R p] : ExpChar R[X] p := by
cases h; exacts [ExpChar.zero, ExpChar.prime ‹_›]
variable (R)
def degreeLE (n : WithBot ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ _ : ↑k > n, LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_le Polynomial.degreeLE
def degreeLT (n : ℕ) : Submodule R R[X] :=
⨅ k : ℕ, ⨅ (_ : k ≥ n), LinearMap.ker (lcoeff R k)
#align polynomial.degree_lt Polynomial.degreeLT
variable {R}
theorem mem_degreeLE {n : WithBot ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLE R n ↔ degree f ≤ n := by
simp only [degreeLE, Submodule.mem_iInf, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero, LinearMap.mem_ker]; rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_le Polynomial.mem_degreeLE
@[mono]
theorem degreeLE_mono {m n : WithBot ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLE R m ≤ degreeLE R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLE.2 (le_trans (mem_degreeLE.1 hf) H)
#align polynomial.degree_le_mono Polynomial.degreeLE_mono
theorem degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLE R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range (n + 1)).image fun n => (X : R[X]) ^ n) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLE.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (Finset.sup_le_iff.1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <|
Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 (Nat.lt_succ_of_le this), rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLE.2
exact
(degree_X_pow_le _).trans (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_le_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLE_eq_span_X_pow
theorem mem_degreeLT {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : f ∈ degreeLT R n ↔ degree f < n := by
rw [degreeLT, Submodule.mem_iInf]
conv_lhs => intro i; rw [Submodule.mem_iInf]
rw [degree, Finset.max_eq_sup_coe]
rw [Finset.sup_lt_iff ?_]
rotate_left
· apply WithBot.bot_lt_coe
conv_rhs =>
simp only [mem_support_iff]
intro b
rw [Nat.cast_withBot, WithBot.coe_lt_coe, lt_iff_not_le, Ne, not_imp_not]
rfl
#align polynomial.mem_degree_lt Polynomial.mem_degreeLT
@[mono]
theorem degreeLT_mono {m n : ℕ} (H : m ≤ n) : degreeLT R m ≤ degreeLT R n := fun _ hf =>
mem_degreeLT.2 (lt_of_lt_of_le (mem_degreeLT.1 hf) <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 H)
#align polynomial.degree_lt_mono Polynomial.degreeLT_mono
theorem degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow [DecidableEq R] {n : ℕ} :
degreeLT R n = Submodule.span R ↑((Finset.range n).image fun n => X ^ n : Finset R[X]) := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro p hp
replace hp := mem_degreeLT.1 hp
rw [← Polynomial.sum_monomial_eq p, Polynomial.sum]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun k hk => ?_
have := WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 ((Finset.sup_lt_iff <| WithBot.bot_lt_coe n).1 hp k hk)
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul']
refine
Submodule.smul_mem _ _
(Submodule.subset_span <|
Finset.mem_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨_, Finset.mem_range.2 this, rfl⟩)
rw [Submodule.span_le, Finset.coe_image, Set.image_subset_iff]
intro k hk
apply mem_degreeLT.2
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_X_pow_le _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 <| Finset.mem_range.1 hk)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.degree_lt_eq_span_X_pow Polynomial.degreeLT_eq_span_X_pow
def degreeLTEquiv (R) [Semiring R] (n : ℕ) : degreeLT R n ≃ₗ[R] Fin n → R where
toFun p n := (↑p : R[X]).coeff n
invFun f :=
⟨∑ i : Fin n, monomial i (f i),
(degreeLT R n).sum_mem fun i _ =>
mem_degreeLT.mpr
(lt_of_le_of_lt (degree_monomial_le i (f i)) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr i.is_lt))⟩
map_add' p q := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_add]
map_smul' x p := by
ext
dsimp
rw [coeff_smul]
rfl
left_inv := by
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
ext1
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk]
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· subst hp0
simp only [coeff_zero, LinearMap.map_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero]
rw [mem_degreeLT, degree_eq_natDegree hp0, Nat.cast_lt] at hp
conv_rhs => rw [p.as_sum_range' n hp, ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
right_inv f := by
ext i
simp only [finset_sum_coeff, Submodule.coe_mk]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single i, coeff_monomial, if_pos rfl]
· rintro j - hji
rw [coeff_monomial, if_neg]
rwa [← Fin.ext_iff]
· intro h
exact (h (Finset.mem_univ _)).elim
#align polynomial.degree_lt_equiv Polynomial.degreeLTEquiv
-- Porting note: removed @[simp] as simp can prove this
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 175 | 177 | theorem degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} {p : R[X]} (hp : p ∈ degreeLT R n) :
degreeLTEquiv _ _ ⟨p, hp⟩ = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by |
rw [LinearEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Submodule.mk_eq_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Idempotents
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ReesAlgebra
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Lattice
#align_import ring_theory.filtration from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe u v
variable {R M : Type u} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
open Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial
@[ext]
structure Ideal.Filtration (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] where
N : ℕ → Submodule R M
mono : ∀ i, N (i + 1) ≤ N i
smul_le : ∀ i, I • N i ≤ N (i + 1)
#align ideal.filtration Ideal.Filtration
variable (F F' : I.Filtration M) {I}
namespace Ideal.Filtration
theorem pow_smul_le (i j : ℕ) : I ^ i • F.N j ≤ F.N (i + j) := by
induction' i with _ ih
· simp
· rw [pow_succ', mul_smul, add_assoc, add_comm 1, ← add_assoc]
exact (smul_mono_right _ ih).trans (F.smul_le _)
#align ideal.filtration.pow_smul_le Ideal.Filtration.pow_smul_le
theorem pow_smul_le_pow_smul (i j k : ℕ) : I ^ (i + k) • F.N j ≤ I ^ k • F.N (i + j) := by
rw [add_comm, pow_add, mul_smul]
exact smul_mono_right _ (F.pow_smul_le i j)
#align ideal.filtration.pow_smul_le_pow_smul Ideal.Filtration.pow_smul_le_pow_smul
protected theorem antitone : Antitone F.N :=
antitone_nat_of_succ_le F.mono
#align ideal.filtration.antitone Ideal.Filtration.antitone
@[simps]
def _root_.Ideal.trivialFiltration (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) : I.Filtration M where
N _ := N
mono _ := le_rfl
smul_le _ := Submodule.smul_le_right
#align ideal.trivial_filtration Ideal.trivialFiltration
instance : Sup (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨fun F F' =>
⟨F.N ⊔ F'.N, fun i => sup_le_sup (F.mono i) (F'.mono i), fun i =>
(Submodule.smul_sup _ _ _).trans_le <| sup_le_sup (F.smul_le i) (F'.smul_le i)⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨fun S =>
{ N := sSup (Ideal.Filtration.N '' S)
mono := fun i => by
apply sSup_le_sSup_of_forall_exists_le _
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, F.mono i⟩
smul_le := fun i => by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup', iSup_apply, Submodule.smul_iSup, iSup_apply]
apply iSup_mono _
rintro ⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩
exact F.smul_le i }⟩
instance : Inf (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨fun F F' =>
⟨F.N ⊓ F'.N, fun i => inf_le_inf (F.mono i) (F'.mono i), fun i =>
(smul_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf (F.smul_le i) (F'.smul_le i)⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨fun S =>
{ N := sInf (Ideal.Filtration.N '' S)
mono := fun i => by
apply sInf_le_sInf_of_forall_exists_le _
rintro _ ⟨⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, F.mono i⟩
smul_le := fun i => by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_apply, iInf_apply]
refine smul_iInf_le.trans ?_
apply iInf_mono _
rintro ⟨_, F, hF, rfl⟩
exact F.smul_le i }⟩
instance : Top (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨I.trivialFiltration ⊤⟩
instance : Bot (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨I.trivialFiltration ⊥⟩
@[simp]
theorem sup_N : (F ⊔ F').N = F.N ⊔ F'.N :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.sup_N Ideal.Filtration.sup_N
@[simp]
theorem sSup_N (S : Set (I.Filtration M)) : (sSup S).N = sSup (Ideal.Filtration.N '' S) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.Sup_N Ideal.Filtration.sSup_N
@[simp]
theorem inf_N : (F ⊓ F').N = F.N ⊓ F'.N :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.inf_N Ideal.Filtration.inf_N
@[simp]
theorem sInf_N (S : Set (I.Filtration M)) : (sInf S).N = sInf (Ideal.Filtration.N '' S) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.Inf_N Ideal.Filtration.sInf_N
@[simp]
theorem top_N : (⊤ : I.Filtration M).N = ⊤ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.top_N Ideal.Filtration.top_N
@[simp]
theorem bot_N : (⊥ : I.Filtration M).N = ⊥ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.bot_N Ideal.Filtration.bot_N
@[simp]
theorem iSup_N {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → I.Filtration M) : (iSup f).N = ⨆ i, (f i).N :=
congr_arg sSup (Set.range_comp _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.supr_N Ideal.Filtration.iSup_N
@[simp]
theorem iInf_N {ι : Sort*} (f : ι → I.Filtration M) : (iInf f).N = ⨅ i, (f i).N :=
congr_arg sInf (Set.range_comp _ _).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ideal.filtration.infi_N Ideal.Filtration.iInf_N
instance : CompleteLattice (I.Filtration M) :=
Function.Injective.completeLattice Ideal.Filtration.N Ideal.Filtration.ext sup_N inf_N
(fun _ => sSup_image) (fun _ => sInf_image) top_N bot_N
instance : Inhabited (I.Filtration M) :=
⟨⊥⟩
def Stable : Prop :=
∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, I • F.N n = F.N (n + 1)
#align ideal.filtration.stable Ideal.Filtration.Stable
@[simps]
def _root_.Ideal.stableFiltration (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) : I.Filtration M where
N i := I ^ i • N
mono i := by dsimp only; rw [add_comm, pow_add, mul_smul]; exact Submodule.smul_le_right
smul_le i := by dsimp only; rw [add_comm, pow_add, mul_smul, pow_one]
#align ideal.stable_filtration Ideal.stableFiltration
theorem _root_.Ideal.stableFiltration_stable (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(I.stableFiltration N).Stable := by
use 0
intro n _
dsimp
rw [add_comm, pow_add, mul_smul, pow_one]
#align ideal.stable_filtration_stable Ideal.stableFiltration_stable
variable {F F'} (h : F.Stable)
theorem Stable.exists_pow_smul_eq : ∃ n₀, ∀ k, F.N (n₀ + k) = I ^ k • F.N n₀ := by
obtain ⟨n₀, hn⟩ := h
use n₀
intro k
induction' k with _ ih
· simp
· rw [← add_assoc, ← hn, ih, add_comm, pow_add, mul_smul, pow_one]
omega
#align ideal.filtration.stable.exists_pow_smul_eq Ideal.Filtration.Stable.exists_pow_smul_eq
theorem Stable.exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge : ∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, F.N n = I ^ (n - n₀) • F.N n₀ := by
obtain ⟨n₀, hn₀⟩ := h.exists_pow_smul_eq
use n₀
intro n hn
convert hn₀ (n - n₀)
rw [add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hn]
#align ideal.filtration.stable.exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge Ideal.Filtration.Stable.exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge
theorem stable_iff_exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge :
F.Stable ↔ ∃ n₀, ∀ n ≥ n₀, F.N n = I ^ (n - n₀) • F.N n₀ := by
refine ⟨Stable.exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge, fun h => ⟨h.choose, fun n hn => ?_⟩⟩
rw [h.choose_spec n hn, h.choose_spec (n + 1) (by omega), smul_smul, ← pow_succ',
tsub_add_eq_add_tsub hn]
#align ideal.filtration.stable_iff_exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge Ideal.Filtration.stable_iff_exists_pow_smul_eq_of_ge
theorem Stable.exists_forall_le (h : F.Stable) (e : F.N 0 ≤ F'.N 0) :
∃ n₀, ∀ n, F.N (n + n₀) ≤ F'.N n := by
obtain ⟨n₀, hF⟩ := h
use n₀
intro n
induction' n with n hn
· refine (F.antitone ?_).trans e; simp
· rw [add_right_comm, ← hF]
· exact (smul_mono_right _ hn).trans (F'.smul_le _)
simp
#align ideal.filtration.stable.exists_forall_le Ideal.Filtration.Stable.exists_forall_le
theorem Stable.bounded_difference (h : F.Stable) (h' : F'.Stable) (e : F.N 0 = F'.N 0) :
∃ n₀, ∀ n, F.N (n + n₀) ≤ F'.N n ∧ F'.N (n + n₀) ≤ F.N n := by
obtain ⟨n₁, h₁⟩ := h.exists_forall_le (le_of_eq e)
obtain ⟨n₂, h₂⟩ := h'.exists_forall_le (le_of_eq e.symm)
use max n₁ n₂
intro n
refine ⟨(F.antitone ?_).trans (h₁ n), (F'.antitone ?_).trans (h₂ n)⟩ <;> simp
#align ideal.filtration.stable.bounded_difference Ideal.Filtration.Stable.bounded_difference
open PolynomialModule
variable (F F')
protected def submodule : Submodule (reesAlgebra I) (PolynomialModule R M) where
carrier := { f | ∀ i, f i ∈ F.N i }
add_mem' hf hg i := Submodule.add_mem _ (hf i) (hg i)
zero_mem' i := Submodule.zero_mem _
smul_mem' r f hf i := by
rw [Subalgebra.smul_def, PolynomialModule.smul_apply]
apply Submodule.sum_mem
rintro ⟨j, k⟩ e
rw [Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at e
subst e
exact F.pow_smul_le j k (Submodule.smul_mem_smul (r.2 j) (hf k))
#align ideal.filtration.submodule Ideal.Filtration.submodule
@[simp]
theorem mem_submodule (f : PolynomialModule R M) : f ∈ F.submodule ↔ ∀ i, f i ∈ F.N i :=
Iff.rfl
#align ideal.filtration.mem_submodule Ideal.Filtration.mem_submodule
theorem inf_submodule : (F ⊓ F').submodule = F.submodule ⊓ F'.submodule := by
ext
exact forall_and
#align ideal.filtration.inf_submodule Ideal.Filtration.inf_submodule
variable (I M)
def submoduleInfHom :
InfHom (I.Filtration M) (Submodule (reesAlgebra I) (PolynomialModule R M)) where
toFun := Ideal.Filtration.submodule
map_inf' := inf_submodule
#align ideal.filtration.submodule_inf_hom Ideal.Filtration.submoduleInfHom
variable {I M}
theorem submodule_closure_single :
AddSubmonoid.closure (⋃ i, single R i '' (F.N i : Set M)) = F.submodule.toAddSubmonoid := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [AddSubmonoid.closure_le, Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
rintro i _ ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩ j
rw [single_apply]
split_ifs with h
· rwa [← h]
· exact (F.N j).zero_mem
· intro f hf
rw [← f.sum_single]
apply AddSubmonoid.sum_mem _ _
rintro c -
exact AddSubmonoid.subset_closure (Set.subset_iUnion _ c <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (hf c))
#align ideal.filtration.submodule_closure_single Ideal.Filtration.submodule_closure_single
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Filtration.lean | 317 | 320 | theorem submodule_span_single :
Submodule.span (reesAlgebra I) (⋃ i, single R i '' (F.N i : Set M)) = F.submodule := by |
rw [← Submodule.span_closure, submodule_closure_single, Submodule.coe_toAddSubmonoid]
exact Submodule.span_eq (Filtration.submodule F)
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
#align_import data.list.sections from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"26f081a2fb920140ed5bc5cc5344e84bcc7cb2b2"
open Nat Function
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
| Mathlib/Data/List/Sections.lean | 23 | 34 | theorem mem_sections {L : List (List α)} {f} : f ∈ sections L ↔ Forall₂ (· ∈ ·) f L := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· induction L generalizing f
· cases mem_singleton.1 h
exact Forall₂.nil
simp only [sections, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind, mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl⟩
simp only [*, forall₂_cons, true_and_iff]
· induction' h with a l f L al fL fs
· simp only [sections, mem_singleton]
simp only [sections, bind_eq_bind, mem_bind, mem_map]
exact ⟨f, fs, a, al, rfl⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.Partition
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Factors
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Closure
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.GCD
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.type from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47adfab39a11a072db552f47594bf8ed2cf8a722"
namespace Equiv.Perm
open Equiv List Multiset
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α]
section CycleType
variable [DecidableEq α]
def cycleType (σ : Perm α) : Multiset ℕ :=
σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support)
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.cycleType
theorem cycleType_def (σ : Perm α) :
σ.cycleType = σ.cycleFactorsFinset.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) :=
rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_def Equiv.Perm.cycleType_def
theorem cycleType_eq' {σ : Perm α} (s : Finset (Perm α)) (h1 : ∀ f : Perm α, f ∈ s → f.IsCycle)
(h2 : (s : Set (Perm α)).Pairwise Disjoint)
(h0 : s.noncommProd id (h2.imp fun _ _ => Disjoint.commute) = σ) :
σ.cycleType = s.1.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
rw [cycleType_def]
congr
rw [cycleFactorsFinset_eq_finset]
exact ⟨h1, h2, h0⟩
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq' Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq'
theorem cycleType_eq {σ : Perm α} (l : List (Perm α)) (h0 : l.prod = σ)
(h1 : ∀ σ : Perm α, σ ∈ l → σ.IsCycle) (h2 : l.Pairwise Disjoint) :
σ.cycleType = l.map (Finset.card ∘ support) := by
have hl : l.Nodup := nodup_of_pairwise_disjoint_cycles h1 h2
rw [cycleType_eq' l.toFinset]
· simp [List.dedup_eq_self.mpr hl, (· ∘ ·)]
· simpa using h1
· simpa [hl] using h2
· simp [hl, h0]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
simp [cycleType_def, cycleFactorsFinset_eq_empty_iff]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_eq_zero Equiv.Perm.cycleType_eq_zero
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_one : (1 : Perm α).cycleType = 0 := cycleType_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_one Equiv.Perm.cycleType_one
theorem card_cycleType_eq_zero {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 0 ↔ σ = 1 := by
rw [card_eq_zero, cycleType_eq_zero]
#align equiv.perm.card_cycle_type_eq_zero Equiv.Perm.card_cycleType_eq_zero
theorem card_cycleType_pos {σ : Perm α} : 0 < Multiset.card σ.cycleType ↔ σ ≠ 1 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans card_cycleType_eq_zero.not
theorem two_le_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 2 ≤ n := by
simp only [cycleType_def, ← Finset.mem_def, Function.comp_apply, Multiset.mem_map,
mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at h
obtain ⟨_, ⟨hc, -⟩, rfl⟩ := h
exact hc.two_le_card_support
#align equiv.perm.two_le_of_mem_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.two_le_of_mem_cycleType
theorem one_lt_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : 1 < n :=
two_le_of_mem_cycleType h
#align equiv.perm.one_lt_of_mem_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.one_lt_of_mem_cycleType
theorem IsCycle.cycleType {σ : Perm α} (hσ : IsCycle σ) : σ.cycleType = [σ.support.card] :=
cycleType_eq [σ] (mul_one σ) (fun _τ hτ => (congr_arg IsCycle (List.mem_singleton.mp hτ)).mpr hσ)
(List.pairwise_singleton Disjoint σ)
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.cycleType
theorem card_cycleType_eq_one {σ : Perm α} : Multiset.card σ.cycleType = 1 ↔ σ.IsCycle := by
rw [card_eq_one]
simp_rw [cycleType_def, Multiset.map_eq_singleton, ← Finset.singleton_val, Finset.val_inj,
cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, ⟨h, -⟩, -⟩
exact h
· intro h
use σ.support.card, σ
simp [h]
#align equiv.perm.card_cycle_type_eq_one Equiv.Perm.card_cycleType_eq_one
theorem Disjoint.cycleType {σ τ : Perm α} (h : Disjoint σ τ) :
(σ * τ).cycleType = σ.cycleType + τ.cycleType := by
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, cycleType_def, h.cycleFactorsFinset_mul_eq_union, ←
Multiset.map_add, Finset.union_val, Multiset.add_eq_union_iff_disjoint.mpr _]
exact Finset.disjoint_val.2 h.disjoint_cycleFactorsFinset
#align equiv.perm.disjoint.cycle_type Equiv.Perm.Disjoint.cycleType
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_inv (σ : Perm α) : σ⁻¹.cycleType = σ.cycleType :=
cycle_induction_on (P := fun τ : Perm α => τ⁻¹.cycleType = τ.cycleType) σ rfl
(fun σ hσ => by simp only [hσ.cycleType, hσ.inv.cycleType, support_inv])
fun σ τ hστ _ hσ hτ => by
simp only [mul_inv_rev, hστ.cycleType, hστ.symm.inv_left.inv_right.cycleType, hσ, hτ,
add_comm]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_inv Equiv.Perm.cycleType_inv
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem cycleType_conj {σ τ : Perm α} : (τ * σ * τ⁻¹).cycleType = σ.cycleType := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, hσ.conj.cycleType, card_support_conj]
| induction_disjoint σ π hd _ hσ hπ =>
rw [← conj_mul, hd.cycleType, (hd.conj _).cycleType, hσ, hπ]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_conj Equiv.Perm.cycleType_conj
theorem sum_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.sum = σ.support.card := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => rw [hσ.cycleType, sum_coe, List.sum_singleton]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => rw [hd.cycleType, sum_add, hσ, hτ, hd.card_support_mul]
#align equiv.perm.sum_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.sum_cycleType
theorem sign_of_cycleType' (σ : Perm α) :
sign σ = (σ.cycleType.map fun n => -(-1 : ℤˣ) ^ n).prod := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.sign]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hσ, hτ, hd.cycleType]
#align equiv.perm.sign_of_cycle_type' Equiv.Perm.sign_of_cycleType'
theorem sign_of_cycleType (f : Perm α) :
sign f = (-1 : ℤˣ) ^ (f.cycleType.sum + Multiset.card f.cycleType) := by
rw [sign_of_cycleType']
induction' f.cycleType using Multiset.induction_on with a s ihs
· rfl
· rw [Multiset.map_cons, Multiset.prod_cons, Multiset.sum_cons, Multiset.card_cons, ihs]
simp only [pow_add, pow_one, mul_neg_one, neg_mul, mul_neg, mul_assoc, mul_one]
#align equiv.perm.sign_of_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.sign_of_cycleType
@[simp] -- Porting note: new attr
theorem lcm_cycleType (σ : Perm α) : σ.cycleType.lcm = orderOf σ := by
induction σ using cycle_induction_on with
| base_one => simp
| base_cycles σ hσ => simp [hσ.cycleType, hσ.orderOf]
| induction_disjoint σ τ hd _ hσ hτ => simp [hd.cycleType, hd.orderOf, lcm_eq_nat_lcm, hσ, hτ]
#align equiv.perm.lcm_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.lcm_cycleType
theorem dvd_of_mem_cycleType {σ : Perm α} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ σ.cycleType) : n ∣ orderOf σ := by
rw [← lcm_cycleType]
exact dvd_lcm h
#align equiv.perm.dvd_of_mem_cycle_type Equiv.Perm.dvd_of_mem_cycleType
theorem orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf (f : Perm α) (x : α) : orderOf (cycleOf f x) ∣ orderOf f := by
by_cases hx : f x = x
· rw [← cycleOf_eq_one_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· refine dvd_of_mem_cycleType ?_
rw [cycleType, Multiset.mem_map]
refine ⟨f.cycleOf x, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Finset.mem_def, cycleOf_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff, mem_support]
· simp [(isCycle_cycleOf _ hx).orderOf]
#align equiv.perm.order_of_cycle_of_dvd_order_of Equiv.Perm.orderOf_cycleOf_dvd_orderOf
theorem two_dvd_card_support {σ : Perm α} (hσ : σ ^ 2 = 1) : 2 ∣ σ.support.card :=
(congr_arg (Dvd.dvd 2) σ.sum_cycleType).mp
(Multiset.dvd_sum fun n hn => by
rw [_root_.le_antisymm
(Nat.le_of_dvd zero_lt_two <|
(dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn).trans <| orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hσ)
(two_le_of_mem_cycleType hn)])
#align equiv.perm.two_dvd_card_support Equiv.Perm.two_dvd_card_support
theorem cycleType_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (hσ : (orderOf σ).Prime) :
∃ n : ℕ, σ.cycleType = Multiset.replicate (n + 1) (orderOf σ) := by
refine ⟨Multiset.card σ.cycleType - 1, eq_replicate.2 ⟨?_, fun n hn ↦ ?_⟩⟩
· rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
rw [Nat.succ_le_iff, card_cycleType_pos, Ne, ← orderOf_eq_one_iff]
exact hσ.ne_one
· exact (hσ.eq_one_or_self_of_dvd n (dvd_of_mem_cycleType hn)).resolve_left
(one_lt_of_mem_cycleType hn).ne'
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_prime_order Equiv.Perm.cycleType_prime_order
theorem isCycle_of_prime_order {σ : Perm α} (h1 : (orderOf σ).Prime)
(h2 : σ.support.card < 2 * orderOf σ) : σ.IsCycle := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := cycleType_prime_order h1
rw [← σ.sum_cycleType, hn, Multiset.sum_replicate, nsmul_eq_mul, Nat.cast_id,
mul_lt_mul_right (orderOf_pos σ), Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff, Nat.lt_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero] at h2
rw [← card_cycleType_eq_one, hn, card_replicate, h2]
#align equiv.perm.is_cycle_of_prime_order Equiv.Perm.isCycle_of_prime_order
theorem cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset {f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
f.cycleType ≤ g.cycleType := by
have hf' := mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff.1 hf
rw [cycleType_def, cycleType_def, hf'.left.cycleFactorsFinset_eq_singleton]
refine map_le_map ?_
simpa only [Finset.singleton_val, singleton_le, Finset.mem_val] using hf
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_le_of_mem_cycle_factors_finset Equiv.Perm.cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset
theorem cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
{f g : Perm α} (hf : f ∈ g.cycleFactorsFinset) :
(g * f⁻¹).cycleType = g.cycleType - f.cycleType :=
add_right_cancel (b := f.cycleType) <| by
rw [← (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf).cycleType, inv_mul_cancel_right,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (cycleType_le_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hf)]
#align equiv.perm.cycle_type_mul_mem_cycle_factors_finset_eq_sub Equiv.Perm.cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Type.lean | 238 | 264 | theorem isConj_of_cycleType_eq {σ τ : Perm α} (h : cycleType σ = cycleType τ) : IsConj σ τ := by |
induction σ using cycle_induction_on generalizing τ with
| base_one =>
rw [cycleType_one, eq_comm, cycleType_eq_zero] at h
rw [h]
| base_cycles σ hσ =>
have hτ := card_cycleType_eq_one.2 hσ
rw [h, card_cycleType_eq_one] at hτ
apply hσ.isConj hτ
rw [hσ.cycleType, hτ.cycleType, coe_eq_coe, List.singleton_perm] at h
exact List.singleton_injective h
| induction_disjoint σ π hd hc hσ hπ =>
rw [hd.cycleType] at h
have h' : σ.support.card ∈ τ.cycleType := by
simp [← h, hc.cycleType]
obtain ⟨σ', hσ'l, hσ'⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.mp h'
have key : IsConj (σ' * τ * σ'⁻¹) τ := (isConj_iff.2 ⟨σ', rfl⟩).symm
refine IsConj.trans ?_ key
rw [mul_assoc]
have hs : σ.cycleType = σ'.cycleType := by
rw [← Finset.mem_def, mem_cycleFactorsFinset_iff] at hσ'l
rw [hc.cycleType, ← hσ', hσ'l.left.cycleType]; rfl
refine hd.isConj_mul (hσ hs) (hπ ?_) ?_
· rw [cycleType_mul_inv_mem_cycleFactorsFinset_eq_sub, ← h, add_comm, hs,
add_tsub_cancel_right]
rwa [Finset.mem_def]
· exact (disjoint_mul_inv_of_mem_cycleFactorsFinset hσ'l).symm
|
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
#align_import model_theory.definability from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
universe u v w u₁
namespace Set
variable {M : Type w} (A : Set M) (L : FirstOrder.Language.{u, v}) [L.Structure M]
open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language FirstOrder.Language.Structure
variable {α : Type u₁} {β : Type*}
def Definable (s : Set (α → M)) : Prop :=
∃ φ : L[[A]].Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize
#align set.definable Set.Definable
variable {L} {A} {B : Set M} {s : Set (α → M)}
theorem Definable.map_expansion {L' : FirstOrder.Language} [L'.Structure M] (h : A.Definable L s)
(φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] : A.Definable L' s := by
obtain ⟨ψ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(φ.addConstants A).onFormula ψ, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, LHom.realize_onFormula]
#align set.definable.map_expansion Set.Definable.map_expansion
theorem definable_iff_exists_formula_sum :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula (A ⊕ α), s = {v | φ.Realize (Sum.elim (↑) v)} := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv)]
refine exists_congr (fun φ => iff_iff_eq.2 (congr_arg (s = ·) ?_))
ext
simp only [Formula.Realize, BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv, constantsOn, mk₂_Relations,
BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq]
refine BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id ?_ (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
intros
simp only [Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply, Term.realize_varsToConstants,
coe_con, Term.realize_relabel]
congr
ext a
rcases a with (_ | _) | _ <;> rfl
theorem empty_definable_iff :
(∅ : Set M).Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (LEquiv.addEmptyConstants L (∅ : Set M)).onFormula]
simp [-constantsOn]
#align set.empty_definable_iff Set.empty_definable_iff
theorem definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params :
A.Definable L s ↔ (∅ : Set M).Definable (L[[A]]) s :=
empty_definable_iff.symm
#align set.definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params Set.definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params
theorem Definable.mono (hAs : A.Definable L s) (hAB : A ⊆ B) : B.Definable L s := by
rw [definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params] at *
exact hAs.map_expansion (L.lhomWithConstantsMap (Set.inclusion hAB))
#align set.definable.mono Set.Definable.mono
@[simp]
theorem definable_empty : A.Definable L (∅ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊥, by
ext
simp⟩
#align set.definable_empty Set.definable_empty
@[simp]
theorem definable_univ : A.Definable L (univ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊤, by
ext
simp⟩
#align set.definable_univ Set.definable_univ
@[simp]
theorem Definable.inter {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∩ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, rfl⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊓ θ, ?_⟩
ext
simp
#align set.definable.inter Set.Definable.inter
@[simp]
theorem Definable.union {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∪ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, hθ⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊔ θ, ?_⟩
ext
rw [hφ, hθ, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_sup, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq]
#align set.definable.union Set.Definable.union
theorem definable_finset_inf {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.inf f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_univ (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.inf_insert]
exact (hf i).inter h
#align set.definable_finset_inf Set.definable_finset_inf
theorem definable_finset_sup {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.sup f) := by
classical
refine Finset.induction definable_empty (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.sup_insert]
exact (hf i).union h
#align set.definable_finset_sup Set.definable_finset_sup
theorem definable_finset_biInter {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.inf_set_eq_iInter]
exact definable_finset_inf hf s
#align set.definable_finset_bInter Set.definable_finset_biInter
theorem definable_finset_biUnion {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)}
(hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i)) (s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
rw [← Finset.sup_set_eq_biUnion]
exact definable_finset_sup hf s
#align set.definable_finset_bUnion Set.definable_finset_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem Definable.compl {s : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L s) : A.Definable L sᶜ := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
refine ⟨φ.not, ?_⟩
ext v
rw [hφ, compl_setOf, mem_setOf, mem_setOf, Formula.realize_not]
#align set.definable.compl Set.Definable.compl
@[simp]
theorem Definable.sdiff {s t : Set (α → M)} (hs : A.Definable L s) (ht : A.Definable L t) :
A.Definable L (s \ t) :=
hs.inter ht.compl
#align set.definable.sdiff Set.Definable.sdiff
theorem Definable.preimage_comp (f : α → β) {s : Set (α → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) :
A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) ⁻¹' s) := by
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨φ.relabel f, ?_⟩
ext
simp only [Set.preimage_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_relabel]
#align set.definable.preimage_comp Set.Definable.preimage_comp
theorem Definable.image_comp_equiv {s : Set (β → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) (f : α ≃ β) :
A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) '' s) := by
refine (congr rfl ?_).mp (h.preimage_comp f.symm)
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse]
· intro i
ext b
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
· intro i
ext a
simp
#align set.definable.image_comp_equiv Set.Definable.image_comp_equiv
theorem definable_iff_finitely_definable :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ (A0 : Finset M), (A0 : Set M) ⊆ A ∧
(A0 : Set M).Definable L s := by
letI := Classical.decEq M
letI := Classical.decEq α
constructor
· simp only [definable_iff_exists_formula_sum]
rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩
let A0 := (φ.freeVarFinset.preimage Sum.inl
(Function.Injective.injOn Sum.inl_injective)).image Subtype.val
have hA0 : (A0 : Set M) ⊆ A := by simp [A0]
refine ⟨A0, hA0, (φ.restrictFreeVar
(Set.inclusion (Set.Subset.refl _))).relabel ?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨a | a, ha⟩
· exact Sum.inl (Sum.inl ⟨a, by simpa [A0] using ha⟩)
· exact Sum.inl (Sum.inr a)
· ext v
simp only [Formula.Realize, BoundedFormula.realize_relabel,
Set.mem_setOf_eq]
apply Iff.symm
convert BoundedFormula.realize_restrictFreeVar _
ext a
rcases a with ⟨_ | _, _⟩ <;> simp
· rintro ⟨A0, hA0, hd⟩
exact Definable.mono hd hA0
theorem Definable.image_comp_sum_inl_fin (m : ℕ) {s : Set (Sum α (Fin m) → M)}
(h : A.Definable L s) : A.Definable L ((fun g : Sum α (Fin m) → M => g ∘ Sum.inl) '' s) := by
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(BoundedFormula.relabel id φ).exs, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, mem_setOf_eq, BoundedFormula.realize_exs,
BoundedFormula.realize_relabel, Function.comp_id, Fin.castAdd_zero, Fin.cast_refl]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact
⟨y ∘ Sum.inr, (congr (congr rfl (Sum.elim_comp_inl_inr y).symm) (funext finZeroElim)).mp hy⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ⟨Sum.elim x y, (congr rfl (funext finZeroElim)).mp hy, Sum.elim_comp_inl _ _⟩
#align set.definable.image_comp_sum_inl_fin Set.Definable.image_comp_sum_inl_fin
theorem Definable.image_comp_embedding {s : Set (β → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) (f : α ↪ β)
[Finite β] : A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) '' s) := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype β
refine
(congr rfl (ext fun x => ?_)).mp
(((h.image_comp_equiv (Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f))).image_comp_equiv
(Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.ofInjective f f.injective)
(Fintype.equivFin (↥(range f)ᶜ)).symm)).image_comp_sum_inl_fin
_)
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_image, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
refine exists_congr fun y => and_congr_right fun _ => Eq.congr_left (funext fun a => ?_)
simp
#align set.definable.image_comp_embedding Set.Definable.image_comp_embedding
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Definability.lean | 246 | 279 | theorem Definable.image_comp {s : Set (β → M)} (h : A.Definable L s) (f : α → β) [Finite α]
[Finite β] : A.Definable L ((fun g : β → M => g ∘ f) '' s) := by |
classical
cases nonempty_fintype α
cases nonempty_fintype β
have h :=
(((h.image_comp_equiv (Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f))).image_comp_equiv
(Equiv.sumCongr (_root_.Equiv.refl _)
(Fintype.equivFin _).symm)).image_comp_sum_inl_fin
_).preimage_comp
(rangeSplitting f)
have h' :
A.Definable L { x : α → M | ∀ a, x a = x (rangeSplitting f (rangeFactorization f a)) } := by
have h' : ∀ a,
A.Definable L { x : α → M | x a = x (rangeSplitting f (rangeFactorization f a)) } := by
refine fun a => ⟨(var a).equal (var (rangeSplitting f (rangeFactorization f a))), ext ?_⟩
simp
refine (congr rfl (ext ?_)).mp (definable_finset_biInter h' Finset.univ)
simp
refine (congr rfl (ext fun x => ?_)).mp (h.inter h')
simp only [Equiv.coe_trans, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, mem_image, exists_exists_and_eq_and,
mem_setOf_eq]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨y, ys, hy⟩, hx⟩
refine ⟨y, ys, ?_⟩
ext a
rw [hx a, ← Function.comp_apply (f := x), ← hy]
simp
· rintro ⟨y, ys, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, ys, ?_⟩, fun a => ?_⟩
· ext
simp [Set.apply_rangeSplitting f]
· rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, apply_rangeSplitting f,
rangeFactorization_coe]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Enumerative.DoubleCounting
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.AdjMatrix
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.strongly_regular from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2b35fc7bea4640cb75e477e83f32fbd538920822"
open Finset
universe u
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V]
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj]
structure IsSRGWith (n k ℓ μ : ℕ) : Prop where
card : Fintype.card V = n
regular : G.IsRegularOfDegree k
of_adj : ∀ v w : V, G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = ℓ
of_not_adj : Pairwise fun v w => ¬G.Adj v w → Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) = μ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith
variable {G} {n k ℓ μ : ℕ}
theorem bot_strongly_regular : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) 0 ℓ 0 where
card := rfl
regular := bot_degree
of_adj := fun v w h => h.elim
of_not_adj := fun v w _h => by
simp only [card_eq_zero, Fintype.card_ofFinset, forall_true_left, not_false_iff, bot_adj]
ext
simp [mem_commonNeighbors]
#align simple_graph.bot_strongly_regular SimpleGraph.bot_strongly_regular
theorem IsSRGWith.top :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).IsSRGWith (Fintype.card V) (Fintype.card V - 1) (Fintype.card V - 2) μ where
card := rfl
regular := IsRegularOfDegree.top
of_adj := fun v w h => by
rw [card_commonNeighbors_top]
exact h
of_not_adj := fun v w h h' => False.elim (h' ((top_adj v w).2 h))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.top SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.top
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card =
2 * k - Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w) := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m := Fintype.card (G.commonNeighbors v w))
rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel, ← Set.toFinset_card]
-- Porting note: Set.toFinset_inter needs workaround to use unification to solve for one of the
-- instance arguments:
· simp [commonNeighbors, @Set.toFinset_inter _ _ _ _ _ _ (_),
← neighborFinset_def, Finset.card_union_add_card_inter, card_neighborFinset_eq_degree,
h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
· apply le_trans (card_commonNeighbors_le_degree_left _ _ _)
simp [h.regular.degree_eq, two_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_eq SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(hne : v ≠ w) (ha : ¬G.Adj v w) :
(G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card = 2 * k - μ := by
rw [← h.of_not_adj hne ha]
apply h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_not_adj
theorem IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_adj {v w : V} (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ)
(ha : G.Adj v w) : (G.neighborFinset v ∪ G.neighborFinset w).card = 2 * k - ℓ := by
rw [← h.of_adj v w ha]
apply h.card_neighborFinset_union_eq
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align simple_graph.is_SRG_with.card_neighbor_finset_union_of_adj SimpleGraph.IsSRGWith.card_neighborFinset_union_of_adj
theorem compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq {v w : V} :
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ \ {v} ∩ ((G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ \ {w}) =
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) := by
ext
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp [imp_iff_not_or, or_assoc, or_comm, or_left_comm]
#align simple_graph.compl_neighbor_finset_sdiff_inter_eq SimpleGraph.compl_neighborFinset_sdiff_inter_eq
theorem sdiff_compl_neighborFinset_inter_eq {v w : V} (h : G.Adj v w) :
((G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ) \ ({w} ∪ {v}) =
(G.neighborFinset v)ᶜ ∩ (G.neighborFinset w)ᶜ := by
ext
simp only [and_imp, mem_union, mem_sdiff, mem_compl, and_iff_left_iff_imp, mem_neighborFinset,
mem_inter, mem_singleton]
rintro hnv hnw (rfl | rfl)
· exact hnv h
· apply hnw
rwa [adj_comm]
#align simple_graph.sdiff_compl_neighbor_finset_inter_eq SimpleGraph.sdiff_compl_neighborFinset_inter_eq
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/StronglyRegular.lean | 137 | 140 | theorem IsSRGWith.compl_is_regular (h : G.IsSRGWith n k ℓ μ) :
Gᶜ.IsRegularOfDegree (n - k - 1) := by |
rw [← h.card, Nat.sub_sub, add_comm, ← Nat.sub_sub]
exact h.regular.compl
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Free.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Discrete
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.NaturalTransformation
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Opposite
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Coherence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CommSq
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.braided from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2efd2423f8d25fa57cf7a179f5d8652ab4d0df44"
open CategoryTheory MonoidalCategory
universe v v₁ v₂ v₃ u u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
class BraidedCategory (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] where
braiding : ∀ X Y : C, X ⊗ Y ≅ Y ⊗ X
braiding_naturality_right :
∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z),
X ◁ f ≫ (braiding X Z).hom = (braiding X Y).hom ≫ f ▷ X := by
aesop_cat
braiding_naturality_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C),
f ▷ Z ≫ (braiding Y Z).hom = (braiding X Z).hom ≫ Z ◁ f := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_forward :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (braiding X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).hom =
((braiding X Y).hom ▷ Z) ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫ (Y ◁ (braiding X Z).hom) := by
aesop_cat
hexagon_reverse :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (braiding (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ (α_ Z X Y).inv =
(X ◁ (braiding Y Z).hom) ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫ ((braiding X Z).hom ▷ Y) := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.braided_category CategoryTheory.BraidedCategory
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)]
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_left
BraidedCategory.braiding_naturality_right
attribute [reassoc] BraidedCategory.hexagon_forward BraidedCategory.hexagon_reverse
open Category
open MonoidalCategory
open BraidedCategory
@[inherit_doc]
notation "β_" => BraidedCategory.braiding
namespace BraidedCategory
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v} C] [BraidedCategory.{v} C]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ (β_ Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ X Z Y).inv ≫
(β_ X Z).hom ▷ Y ≫ (α_ Z X Y).hom := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).inv).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Z X Y).inv).1
simp [hexagon_reverse]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (β_ X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ Y X Z).hom ≫
Y ◁ (β_ X Z).hom ≫ (α_ Y Z X).inv := by
apply (cancel_epi (α_ X Y Z).hom).1
apply (cancel_mono (α_ Y Z X).hom).1
simp [hexagon_forward]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_left (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ Z X Y).inv ≫ (β_ X Z).inv ▷ Y ≫ (α_ X Z Y).hom ≫
X ◁ (β_ Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem braiding_inv_tensor_right (X Y Z : C) :
(β_ X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ Y Z X).hom ≫ Y ◁ (β_ X Z).inv ≫ (α_ Y X Z).inv ≫
(β_ X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Braided/Basic.lean | 125 | 128 | theorem braiding_naturality {X X' Y Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(f ⊗ g) ≫ (braiding Y Y').hom = (braiding X X').hom ≫ (g ⊗ f) := by |
rw [tensorHom_def' f g, tensorHom_def g f]
simp_rw [Category.assoc, braiding_naturality_left, braiding_naturality_right_assoc]
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.adj_get_vert_succ SimpleGraph.Walk.adj_getVert_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_append {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(cons h p).append q = cons h (p.append q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_append
@[simp]
theorem cons_nil_append {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h nil).append p = cons h p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_nil_append
@[simp]
theorem append_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.append nil = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => rw [cons_append, ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.append_nil
@[simp]
theorem nil_append {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : nil.append p = p :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.nil_append SimpleGraph.Walk.nil_append
theorem append_assoc {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
p.append (q.append r) = (p.append q).append r := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p' ih =>
dsimp only [append]
rw [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.append_assoc SimpleGraph.Walk.append_assoc
@[simp]
theorem append_copy_copy {u v w u' v' w'} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hw : w = w') :
(p.copy hu hv).append (q.copy hv hw) = (p.append q).copy hu hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.append_copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.append_copy_copy
theorem concat_nil {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : nil.concat h = cons h nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_nil
@[simp]
theorem concat_cons {u v w x : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (h' : G.Adj w x) :
(cons h p).concat h' = cons h (p.concat h') := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_cons
theorem append_concat {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (h : G.Adj w x) :
p.append (q.concat h) = (p.append q).concat h := append_assoc _ _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.append_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.append_concat
theorem concat_append {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) (q : G.Walk w x) :
(p.concat h).append q = p.append (cons h q) := by
rw [concat_eq_append, ← append_assoc, cons_nil_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_append
theorem exists_cons_eq_concat {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
∃ (x : V) (q : G.Walk u x) (h' : G.Adj x w), cons h p = q.concat h' := by
induction p generalizing u with
| nil => exact ⟨_, nil, h, rfl⟩
| cons h' p ih =>
obtain ⟨y, q, h'', hc⟩ := ih h'
refine ⟨y, cons h q, h'', ?_⟩
rw [concat_cons, hc]
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_cons_eq_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_cons_eq_concat
theorem exists_concat_eq_cons {u v w : V} :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w),
∃ (x : V) (h' : G.Adj u x) (q : G.Walk x w), p.concat h = cons h' q
| nil, h => ⟨_, h, nil, rfl⟩
| cons h' p, h => ⟨_, h', Walk.concat p h, concat_cons _ _ _⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_concat_eq_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_concat_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).reverse = nil := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_nil
theorem reverse_singleton {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : (cons h nil).reverse = cons (G.symm h) nil :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_singleton SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_singleton
@[simp]
theorem cons_reverseAux {u v w x : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk w x) (h : G.Adj w u) :
(cons h p).reverseAux q = p.reverseAux (cons (G.symm h) q) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem append_reverseAux {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (r : G.Walk u x) :
(p.append q).reverseAux r = q.reverseAux (p.reverseAux r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => exact ih q (cons (G.symm h) r)
#align simple_graph.walk.append_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.append_reverseAux
@[simp]
protected theorem reverseAux_append {u v w x : V}
(p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) (r : G.Walk w x) :
(p.reverseAux q).append r = p.reverseAux (q.append r) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h _ ih => simp [ih (cons (G.symm h) q)]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_append
protected theorem reverseAux_eq_reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
p.reverseAux q = p.reverse.append q := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux_eq_reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux_eq_reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).reverse = p.reverse.append (cons (G.symm h) nil) := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_cons
@[simp]
theorem reverse_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).reverse = p.reverse.copy hv hu := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_copy
@[simp]
theorem reverse_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).reverse = q.reverse.append p.reverse := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_append SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_append
@[simp]
theorem reverse_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).reverse = cons (G.symm h) p.reverse := by simp [concat_eq_append]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_concat
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.reverse = p := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih]
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem length_nil {u : V} : (nil : G.Walk u u).length = 0 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) :
(cons h p).length = p.length + 1 := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.length_cons
@[simp]
theorem length_copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') :
(p.copy hu hv).length = p.length := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.length_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.length_copy
@[simp]
theorem length_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_append SimpleGraph.Walk.length_append
@[simp]
theorem length_concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
(p.concat h).length = p.length + 1 := length_append _ _
#align simple_graph.walk.length_concat SimpleGraph.Walk.length_concat
@[simp]
protected theorem length_reverseAux {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk u w) :
(p.reverseAux q).length = p.length + q.length := by
induction p with
| nil => simp!
| cons _ _ ih => simp [ih, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_assoc]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverseAux
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.length = p.length := by simp [reverse]
#align simple_graph.walk.length_reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.length_reverse
theorem eq_of_length_eq_zero {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 0 → u = v
| nil, _ => rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.eq_of_length_eq_zero
theorem adj_of_length_eq_one {u v : V} : ∀ {p : G.Walk u v}, p.length = 1 → G.Adj u v
| cons h nil, _ => h
@[simp]
theorem exists_length_eq_zero_iff {u v : V} : (∃ p : G.Walk u v, p.length = 0) ↔ u = v := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact eq_of_length_eq_zero hp
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨nil, rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_length_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_eq_zero_iff {u : V} {p : G.Walk u u} : p.length = 0 ↔ p = nil := by cases p <;> simp
#align simple_graph.walk.length_eq_zero_iff SimpleGraph.Walk.length_eq_zero_iff
theorem getVert_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) (i : ℕ) :
(p.append q).getVert i = if i < p.length then p.getVert i else q.getVert (i - p.length) := by
induction p generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons h p ih => cases i <;> simp [getVert, ih, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff]
theorem getVert_reverse {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (i : ℕ) :
p.reverse.getVert i = p.getVert (p.length - i) := by
induction p with
| nil => rfl
| cons h p ih =>
simp only [reverse_cons, getVert_append, length_reverse, ih, length_cons]
split_ifs
next hi =>
rw [Nat.succ_sub hi.le]
simp [getVert]
next hi =>
obtain rfl | hi' := Nat.eq_or_lt_of_not_lt hi
· simp [getVert]
· rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq (Nat.sub_pos_of_lt hi') rfl, Nat.sub_eq_zero_of_le hi']
simp [getVert]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 499 | 500 | theorem concat_ne_nil {u v : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v u) : p.concat h ≠ nil := by |
cases p <;> simp [concat]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
#align_import data.polynomial.algebra_map from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e064a7bf82ad94c3c17b5128bbd860d1ec34874e"
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {A' B : Type*} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {p q r : R[X]}
instance algebraOfAlgebra : Algebra R A[X] where
smul_def' r p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply]
rw [toFinsupp_smul, toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_C]
exact Algebra.smul_def' _ _
commutes' r p :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
dsimp only [RingHom.toFun_eq_coe, RingHom.comp_apply]
simp_rw [toFinsupp_mul, toFinsupp_C]
convert Algebra.commutes' r p.toFinsupp
toRingHom := C.comp (algebraMap R A)
#align polynomial.algebra_of_algebra Polynomial.algebraOfAlgebra
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_apply (r : R) : algebraMap R A[X] r = C (algebraMap R A r) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.algebra_map_apply Polynomial.algebraMap_apply
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_algebraMap (r : R) : (algebraMap R A[X] r).toFinsupp = algebraMap R _ r :=
show toFinsupp (C (algebraMap _ _ r)) = _ by
rw [toFinsupp_C]
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_algebra_map Polynomial.toFinsupp_algebraMap
theorem ofFinsupp_algebraMap (r : R) : (⟨algebraMap R _ r⟩ : A[X]) = algebraMap R A[X] r :=
toFinsupp_injective (toFinsupp_algebraMap _).symm
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_algebra_map Polynomial.ofFinsupp_algebraMap
theorem C_eq_algebraMap (r : R) : C r = algebraMap R R[X] r :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.C_eq_algebra_map Polynomial.C_eq_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R R[X] = C :=
rfl
@[simps! apply]
def CAlgHom : A →ₐ[R] A[X] where
toRingHom := C
commutes' _ := rfl
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {f g : A[X] →ₐ[R] B}
(hC : f.comp CAlgHom = g.comp CAlgHom)
(hX : f X = g X) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom hC) hX)
#align polynomial.alg_hom_ext' Polynomial.algHom_ext'
variable (R)
open AddMonoidAlgebra in
@[simps!]
def toFinsuppIsoAlg : R[X] ≃ₐ[R] R[ℕ] :=
{ toFinsuppIso R with
commutes' := fun r => by
dsimp }
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_alg Polynomial.toFinsuppIsoAlg
variable {R}
instance subalgebraNontrivial [Nontrivial A] : Nontrivial (Subalgebra R A[X]) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, by
rw [Ne, SetLike.ext_iff, not_forall]
refine ⟨X, ?_⟩
simp only [Algebra.mem_bot, not_exists, Set.mem_range, iff_true_iff, Algebra.mem_top,
algebraMap_apply, not_forall]
intro x
rw [ext_iff, not_forall]
refine ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [coeff_C]⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem algHom_eval₂_algebraMap {R A B : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Algebra R A] [Algebra R B] (p : R[X]) (f : A →ₐ[R] B) (a : A) :
f (eval₂ (algebraMap R A) a p) = eval₂ (algebraMap R B) (f a) p := by
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum_def]
simp only [f.map_sum, f.map_mul, f.map_pow, eq_intCast, map_intCast, AlgHom.commutes]
#align polynomial.alg_hom_eval₂_algebra_map Polynomial.algHom_eval₂_algebraMap
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/AlgebraMap.lean | 131 | 136 | theorem eval₂_algebraMap_X {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (p : R[X])
(f : R[X] →ₐ[R] A) : eval₂ (algebraMap R A) (f X) p = f p := by |
conv_rhs => rw [← Polynomial.sum_C_mul_X_pow_eq p]
simp only [eval₂_eq_sum, sum_def]
simp only [f.map_sum, f.map_mul, f.map_pow, eq_intCast, map_intCast]
simp [Polynomial.C_eq_algebraMap]
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Gluing
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Diagonal
#align_import algebraic_geometry.pullbacks from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7316286ff2942aa14e540add9058c6b0aa1c8070"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe v u
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme
namespace Pullback
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {X Y Z : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : OpenCover.{u} X) (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
variable [∀ i, HasPullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g]
def v (i j : 𝒰.J) : Scheme :=
pullback ((pullback.fst : pullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g ⟶ _) ≫ 𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j)
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.V AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.v
def t (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ v 𝒰 f g j i := by
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd ≫ 𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g
have : HasPullback (pullback.snd ≫ 𝒰.map j ≫ f) g :=
hasPullback_assoc_symm (𝒰.map i) (𝒰.map j) (𝒰.map j ≫ f) g
refine (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).inv ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackAssoc ..).hom ≫ (pullbackSymmetry ..).hom
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· rw [pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc, pullback.condition_assoc, Category.comp_id]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_fst (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.snd := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_fst,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t_fst_fst AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t_fst_fst
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_fst_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) :
t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc, pullbackAssoc_hom_snd_snd,
pullback.lift_snd, Category.comp_id, pullbackAssoc_inv_snd, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t_fst_snd
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t_snd (i j : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i j ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst := by
simp only [t, Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd, pullbackAssoc_hom_fst,
pullback.lift_fst_assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst, pullbackAssoc_inv_fst_snd,
pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t_snd
theorem t_id (i : 𝒰.J) : t 𝒰 f g i i = 𝟙 _ := by
apply pullback.hom_ext <;> rw [Category.id_comp]
· apply pullback.hom_ext
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, Category.assoc, t_fst_fst]
· simp only [Category.assoc, t_fst_snd]
· rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]; simp only [pullback.condition, t_snd, Category.assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t_id AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t_id
abbrev fV (i j : 𝒰.J) : v 𝒰 f g i j ⟶ pullback (𝒰.map i ≫ f) g :=
pullback.fst
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.fV AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.fV
def t' (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
pullback (fV 𝒰 f g i j) (fV 𝒰 f g i k) ⟶ pullback (fV 𝒰 f g j k) (fV 𝒰 f g j i) := by
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).hom ≫ ?_
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom
refine ?_ ≫ (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso ..).inv
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (t 𝒰 f g i j) (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_
· simp_rw [Category.comp_id, t_fst_fst_assoc, ← pullback.condition]
· rw [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t' AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_fst,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_fst_fst_fst AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_fst_fst_fst
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_snd,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_fst_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_fst_fst_snd
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_snd_snd, pullback.lift_snd, Category.comp_id,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_snd]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_fst_snd
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_snd_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_fst,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_snd_fst_fst AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_snd_fst_fst
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_snd_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_fst_snd,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_snd_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_snd_fst_snd
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem t'_snd_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst := by
simp only [t', Category.assoc, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd_assoc,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_inv_fst_assoc, pullback.lift_fst_assoc, t_snd,
pullbackRightPullbackFstIso_hom_fst_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.t'_snd_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.t'_snd_snd
theorem cocycle_fst_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ t' 𝒰 f g j k i ≫ t' 𝒰 f g k i j ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst =
pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst := by
simp only [t'_fst_fst_fst, t'_fst_snd, t'_snd_snd]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.cocycle_fst_fst_fst AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.cocycle_fst_fst_fst
theorem cocycle_fst_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ t' 𝒰 f g j k i ≫ t' 𝒰 f g k i j ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t'_fst_fst_snd]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.cocycle_fst_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.cocycle_fst_fst_snd
theorem cocycle_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ t' 𝒰 f g j k i ≫ t' 𝒰 f g k i j ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by
simp only [t'_fst_snd, t'_snd_snd, t'_fst_fst_fst]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.cocycle_fst_snd AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.cocycle_fst_snd
theorem cocycle_snd_fst_fst (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ t' 𝒰 f g j k i ≫ t' 𝒰 f g k i j ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst =
pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.fst := by
rw [← cancel_mono (𝒰.map i)]
simp only [pullback.condition_assoc, t'_snd_fst_fst, t'_fst_snd, t'_snd_snd]
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.pullback.cocycle_snd_fst_fst AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.Pullback.cocycle_snd_fst_fst
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Pullbacks.lean | 184 | 187 | theorem cocycle_snd_fst_snd (i j k : 𝒰.J) :
t' 𝒰 f g i j k ≫ t' 𝒰 f g j k i ≫ t' 𝒰 f g k i j ≫ pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd =
pullback.snd ≫ pullback.fst ≫ pullback.snd := by |
simp only [pullback.condition_assoc, t'_snd_fst_snd]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import data.fin.tuple.bubble_sort_induction from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bf2428c9486c407ca38b5b3fb10b87dad0bc99fa"
namespace Tuple
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/BubbleSortInduction.lean | 34 | 44 | theorem bubble_sort_induction' {n : ℕ} {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {f : Fin n → α}
{P : (Fin n → α) → Prop} (hf : P f)
(h : ∀ (σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n)) (i j : Fin n),
i < j → (f ∘ σ) j < (f ∘ σ) i → P (f ∘ σ) → P (f ∘ σ ∘ Equiv.swap i j)) :
P (f ∘ sort f) := by |
letI := @Preorder.lift _ (Lex (Fin n → α)) _ fun σ : Equiv.Perm (Fin n) => toLex (f ∘ σ)
refine
@WellFounded.induction_bot' _ _ _ (IsWellFounded.wf : WellFounded (· < ·))
(Equiv.refl _) (sort f) P (fun σ => f ∘ σ) (fun σ hσ hfσ => ?_) hf
obtain ⟨i, j, hij₁, hij₂⟩ := antitone_pair_of_not_sorted' hσ
exact ⟨σ * Equiv.swap i j, Pi.lex_desc hij₁.le hij₂, h σ i j hij₁ hij₂ hfσ⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Indexes
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.digits from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"369525b73f229ccd76a6ec0e0e0bf2be57599768"
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
#align nat.digits_aux_0 Nat.digitsAux0
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
#align nat.digits_aux_1 Nat.digitsAux1
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
#align nat.digits_aux Nat.digitsAux
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_zero Nat.digitsAux_zero
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
#align nat.digits_aux_def Nat.digitsAux_def
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
#align nat.digits Nat.digits
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
#align nat.digits_zero Nat.digits_zero
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_zero Nat.digits_zero_zero
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ Nat.digits_zero_succ
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
#align nat.digits_zero_succ' Nat.digits_zero_succ'
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one Nat.digits_one
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10685): dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
#align nat.digits_one_succ Nat.digits_one_succ
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
#align nat.digits_add_two_add_one Nat.digits_add_two_add_one
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
#align nat.digits_def' Nat.digits_def'
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
#align nat.digits_of_lt Nat.digits_of_lt
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
· apply Nat.succ_pos
#align nat.digits_add Nat.digits_add
-- If we had a function converting a list into a polynomial,
-- and appropriate lemmas about that function,
-- we could rewrite this in terms of that.
def ofDigits {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) : List ℕ → α
| [] => 0
| h :: t => h + b * ofDigits b t
#align nat.of_digits Nat.ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_eq_foldr {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (b : α) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = List.foldr (fun x y => ↑x + b * y) 0 L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [ih]
#align nat.of_digits_eq_foldr Nat.ofDigits_eq_foldr
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux (b : ℕ) (l : List ℕ) :
((List.range l.length).zipWith ((fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1))) l).sum =
b * ((List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => a * b ^ i) l).sum := by
suffices
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a : ℕ => a * b ^ (i + 1)) l =
(List.range l.length).zipWith (fun i a => b * (a * b ^ i)) l
by simp [this]
congr; ext; simp [pow_succ]; ring
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux
theorem ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits b L = (L.mapIdx fun i a => a * b ^ i).sum := by
rw [List.mapIdx_eq_enum_map, List.enum_eq_zip_range, List.map_uncurry_zip_eq_zipWith,
ofDigits_eq_foldr]
induction' L with hd tl hl
· simp
· simpa [List.range_succ_eq_map, List.zipWith_map_left, ofDigits_eq_sum_map_with_index_aux] using
Or.inl hl
#align nat.of_digits_eq_sum_map_with_index Nat.ofDigits_eq_sum_mapIdx
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_nil {b : ℕ} : ofDigits b [] = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_singleton {b n : ℕ} : ofDigits b [n] = n := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_singleton Nat.ofDigits_singleton
@[simp]
theorem ofDigits_one_cons {α : Type*} [Semiring α] (h : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
ofDigits (1 : α) (h :: L) = h + ofDigits 1 L := by simp [ofDigits]
#align nat.of_digits_one_cons Nat.ofDigits_one_cons
theorem ofDigits_cons {b hd} {tl : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (hd :: tl) = hd + b * ofDigits b tl := rfl
theorem ofDigits_append {b : ℕ} {l1 l2 : List ℕ} :
ofDigits b (l1 ++ l2) = ofDigits b l1 + b ^ l1.length * ofDigits b l2 := by
induction' l1 with hd tl IH
· simp [ofDigits]
· rw [ofDigits, List.cons_append, ofDigits, IH, List.length_cons, pow_succ']
ring
#align nat.of_digits_append Nat.ofDigits_append
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_ofDigits (α : Type*) [Semiring α] (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) :
((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : α) = ofDigits (b : α) L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· simp [ofDigits]
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; rw [ih]
#align nat.coe_of_digits Nat.coe_ofDigits
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_int_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (L : List ℕ) : ((ofDigits b L : ℕ) : ℤ) = ofDigits (b : ℤ) L := by
induction' L with d L _
· rfl
· dsimp [ofDigits]; push_cast; simp only
#align nat.coe_int_of_digits Nat.coe_int_ofDigits
theorem digits_zero_of_eq_zero {b : ℕ} (h : b ≠ 0) :
∀ {L : List ℕ} (_ : ofDigits b L = 0), ∀ l ∈ L, l = 0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.head .. => Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right h0
| _ :: _, h0, _, List.Mem.tail _ hL =>
digits_zero_of_eq_zero h (mul_right_injective₀ h (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left h0)) _ hL
#align nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero Nat.digits_zero_of_eq_zero
theorem digits_ofDigits (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (L : List ℕ) (w₁ : ∀ l ∈ L, l < b)
(w₂ : ∀ h : L ≠ [], L.getLast h ≠ 0) : digits b (ofDigits b L) = L := by
induction' L with d L ih
· dsimp [ofDigits]
simp
· dsimp [ofDigits]
replace w₂ := w₂ (by simp)
rw [digits_add b h]
· rw [ih]
· intro l m
apply w₁
exact List.mem_cons_of_mem _ m
· intro h
rw [List.getLast_cons h] at w₂
convert w₂
· exact w₁ d (List.mem_cons_self _ _)
· by_cases h' : L = []
· rcases h' with rfl
left
simpa using w₂
· right
contrapose! w₂
refine digits_zero_of_eq_zero h.ne_bot w₂ _ ?_
rw [List.getLast_cons h']
exact List.getLast_mem h'
#align nat.digits_of_digits Nat.digits_ofDigits
theorem ofDigits_digits (b n : ℕ) : ofDigits b (digits b n) = n := by
cases' b with b
· cases' n with n
· rfl
· change ofDigits 0 [n + 1] = n + 1
dsimp [ofDigits]
· cases' b with b
· induction' n with n ih
· rfl
· rw [Nat.zero_add] at ih ⊢
simp only [ih, add_comm 1, ofDigits_one_cons, Nat.cast_id, digits_one_succ]
· apply Nat.strongInductionOn n _
clear n
intro n h
cases n
· rw [digits_zero]
rfl
· simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, digits_add_two_add_one]
dsimp [ofDigits]
rw [h _ (Nat.div_lt_self' _ b)]
rw [Nat.mod_add_div]
#align nat.of_digits_digits Nat.ofDigits_digits
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 290 | 293 | theorem ofDigits_one (L : List ℕ) : ofDigits 1 L = L.sum := by |
induction' L with _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ofDigits, List.sum_cons, ih]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
#align_import topology.noetherian_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
variable (α β : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
namespace TopologicalSpace
@[mk_iff]
class NoetherianSpace : Prop where
wellFounded_opens : WellFounded ((· > ·) : Opens α → Opens α → Prop)
#align topological_space.noetherian_space TopologicalSpace.NoetherianSpace
theorem noetherianSpace_iff_opens : NoetherianSpace α ↔ ∀ s : Opens α, IsCompact (s : Set α) := by
rw [noetherianSpace_iff, CompleteLattice.wellFounded_iff_isSupFiniteCompact,
CompleteLattice.isSupFiniteCompact_iff_all_elements_compact]
exact forall_congr' Opens.isCompactElement_iff
#align topological_space.noetherian_space_iff_opens TopologicalSpace.noetherianSpace_iff_opens
instance (priority := 100) NoetherianSpace.compactSpace [h : NoetherianSpace α] : CompactSpace α :=
⟨(noetherianSpace_iff_opens α).mp h ⊤⟩
#align topological_space.noetherian_space.compact_space TopologicalSpace.NoetherianSpace.compactSpace
variable {α β}
protected theorem NoetherianSpace.isCompact [NoetherianSpace α] (s : Set α) : IsCompact s := by
refine isCompact_iff_finite_subcover.2 fun U hUo hs => ?_
rcases ((noetherianSpace_iff_opens α).mp ‹_› ⟨⋃ i, U i, isOpen_iUnion hUo⟩).elim_finite_subcover U
hUo Set.Subset.rfl with ⟨t, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, hs.trans ht⟩
#align topological_space.noetherian_space.is_compact TopologicalSpace.NoetherianSpace.isCompact
-- Porting note: fixed NS
protected theorem _root_.Inducing.noetherianSpace [NoetherianSpace α] {i : β → α}
(hi : Inducing i) : NoetherianSpace β :=
(noetherianSpace_iff_opens _).2 fun _ => hi.isCompact_iff.2 (NoetherianSpace.isCompact _)
#align topological_space.inducing.noetherian_space Inducing.noetherianSpace
instance NoetherianSpace.set [NoetherianSpace α] (s : Set α) : NoetherianSpace s :=
inducing_subtype_val.noetherianSpace
#align topological_space.noetherian_space.set TopologicalSpace.NoetherianSpace.set
variable (α)
open List in
theorem noetherianSpace_TFAE :
TFAE [NoetherianSpace α,
WellFounded fun s t : Closeds α => s < t,
∀ s : Set α, IsCompact s,
∀ s : Opens α, IsCompact (s : Set α)] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· refine (noetherianSpace_iff α).trans (Opens.compl_bijective.2.wellFounded_iff ?_)
exact (@OrderIso.compl (Set α)).lt_iff_lt.symm
tfae_have 1 ↔ 4
· exact noetherianSpace_iff_opens α
tfae_have 1 → 3
· exact @NoetherianSpace.isCompact α _
tfae_have 3 → 4
· exact fun h s => h s
tfae_finish
#align topological_space.noetherian_space_tfae TopologicalSpace.noetherianSpace_TFAE
variable {α}
theorem noetherianSpace_iff_isCompact : NoetherianSpace α ↔ ∀ s : Set α, IsCompact s :=
(noetherianSpace_TFAE α).out 0 2
theorem NoetherianSpace.wellFounded_closeds [NoetherianSpace α] :
WellFounded fun s t : Closeds α => s < t :=
Iff.mp ((noetherianSpace_TFAE α).out 0 1) ‹_›
instance {α} : NoetherianSpace (CofiniteTopology α) := by
simp only [noetherianSpace_iff_isCompact, isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds,
CofiniteTopology.nhds_eq, Ultrafilter.le_sup_iff, Filter.le_principal_iff]
intro s f hs
rcases f.le_cofinite_or_eq_pure with (hf | ⟨a, rfl⟩)
· rcases Filter.nonempty_of_mem hs with ⟨a, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, Or.inr hf⟩
· exact ⟨a, hs, Or.inl le_rfl⟩
theorem noetherianSpace_of_surjective [NoetherianSpace α] (f : α → β) (hf : Continuous f)
(hf' : Function.Surjective f) : NoetherianSpace β :=
noetherianSpace_iff_isCompact.2 <| (Set.image_surjective.mpr hf').forall.2 fun s =>
(NoetherianSpace.isCompact s).image hf
#align topological_space.noetherian_space_of_surjective TopologicalSpace.noetherianSpace_of_surjective
theorem noetherianSpace_iff_of_homeomorph (f : α ≃ₜ β) : NoetherianSpace α ↔ NoetherianSpace β :=
⟨fun _ => noetherianSpace_of_surjective f f.continuous f.surjective,
fun _ => noetherianSpace_of_surjective f.symm f.symm.continuous f.symm.surjective⟩
#align topological_space.noetherian_space_iff_of_homeomorph TopologicalSpace.noetherianSpace_iff_of_homeomorph
theorem NoetherianSpace.range [NoetherianSpace α] (f : α → β) (hf : Continuous f) :
NoetherianSpace (Set.range f) :=
noetherianSpace_of_surjective (Set.rangeFactorization f) (hf.subtype_mk _)
Set.surjective_onto_range
#align topological_space.noetherian_space.range TopologicalSpace.NoetherianSpace.range
| Mathlib/Topology/NoetherianSpace.lean | 139 | 142 | theorem noetherianSpace_set_iff (s : Set α) :
NoetherianSpace s ↔ ∀ t, t ⊆ s → IsCompact t := by |
simp only [noetherianSpace_iff_isCompact, embedding_subtype_val.isCompact_iff,
Subtype.forall_set_subtype]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 332 | 333 | theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by |
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.add_left Ordnode.Raised.add_left
theorem Raised.add_right (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [add_comm, add_comm m]; exact H.add_left _
#align ordnode.raised.add_right Ordnode.Raised.add_right
theorem Raised.right {l x₁ x₂ r₁ r₂} (H : Raised (size r₁) (size r₂)) :
Raised (size (@node' α l x₁ r₁)) (size (@node' α l x₂ r₂)) := by
rw [node', size_node, size_node]; generalize size r₂ = m at H ⊢
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
#align ordnode.raised.right Ordnode.Raised.right
theorem balanceL_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceL α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← balance_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr, balanceL_eq_balance sl sr]
· intro l0; rw [l0] at H
rcases H with (⟨_, ⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm
exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 (balancedSz_zero.1 H.symm)
· intro l1 _
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩ | ⟨r', e, H | ⟨_, H₂⟩⟩)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) H) (mul_pos (by decide) l1 : (0 : ℕ) < _)
· exact le_trans H₂ (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (raised_iff.1 e).1)
· cases raised_iff.1 e; unfold delta; omega
· exact le_trans (raised_iff.1 e).1 H₂
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance'
theorem balance_sz_dual {l r}
(H : (∃ l', Raised (@size α l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (@size α r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size (dual r)) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size (dual l))) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size (dual l)) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size (dual r)) r' := by
rw [size_dual, size_dual]
exact
H.symm.imp (Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
(Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right BalancedSz.symm)
#align ordnode.balance_sz_dual Ordnode.balance_sz_dual
theorem size_balanceL {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_l Ordnode.size_balanceL
theorem all_balanceL {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceL α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_l Ordnode.all_balanceL
theorem balanceR_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
@balanceR α l x r = balance' l x r := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceR l x r), dual_balanceR,
balanceL_eq_balance' hr.dual hl.dual sr.dual sl.dual (balance_sz_dual H), ← dual_balance',
dual_dual]
#align ordnode.balance_r_eq_balance' Ordnode.balanceR_eq_balance'
theorem size_balanceR {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
size (@balanceR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, size_balance' sl sr]
#align ordnode.size_balance_r Ordnode.size_balanceR
theorem all_balanceR {P l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r)
(H :
(∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
All P (@balanceR α l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balanceR_eq_balance' hl hr sl sr H, all_balance']
#align ordnode.all_balance_r Ordnode.all_balanceR
section
variable [Preorder α]
def Bounded : Ordnode α → WithBot α → WithTop α → Prop
| nil, some a, some b => a < b
| nil, _, _ => True
| node _ l x r, o₁, o₂ => Bounded l o₁ x ∧ Bounded r (↑x) o₂
#align ordnode.bounded Ordnode.Bounded
theorem Bounded.dual :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (dual t) o₂ o₁
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨Or.dual, ol.dual⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual Ordnode.Bounded.dual
theorem Bounded.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} :
Bounded t o₁ o₂ ↔ @Bounded αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) o₂ o₁ :=
⟨Bounded.dual, fun h => by
have := Bounded.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.dual_iff Ordnode.Bounded.dual_iff
theorem Bounded.weak_left : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t ⊥ o₂
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₂ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol.weak_left, Or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_left Ordnode.Bounded.weak_left
theorem Bounded.weak_right : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded t o₁ ⊤
| nil, o₁, o₂, h => by cases o₁ <;> trivial
| node _ l x r, _, _, ⟨ol, Or⟩ => ⟨ol, Or.weak_right⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.weak_right Ordnode.Bounded.weak_right
theorem Bounded.weak {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t o₁ o₂) : Bounded t ⊥ ⊤ :=
h.weak_left.weak_right
#align ordnode.bounded.weak Ordnode.Bounded.weak
theorem Bounded.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t y o → Bounded t x o
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_le_of_lt xy h
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol.mono_left xy, or⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_left Ordnode.Bounded.mono_left
theorem Bounded.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) :
∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o}, Bounded t o x → Bounded t o y
| nil, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| nil, some _, h => lt_of_lt_of_le h xy
| node _ _ _ _, _o, ⟨ol, or⟩ => ⟨ol, or.mono_right xy⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mono_right Ordnode.Bounded.mono_right
theorem Bounded.to_lt : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {x y : α}, Bounded t x y → x < y
| nil, _, _, h => h
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt h₂.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_lt Ordnode.Bounded.to_lt
theorem Bounded.to_nil {t : Ordnode α} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ o₂
| none, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, none, _ => ⟨⟩
| some _, some _, h => h.to_lt
#align ordnode.bounded.to_nil Ordnode.Bounded.to_nil
theorem Bounded.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₂ o₁ o₂
| none, _, _, h₂ => h₂.weak_left
| some _, _, h₁, h₂ => h₂.mono_left (le_of_lt h₁.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_left Ordnode.Bounded.trans_left
theorem Bounded.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} :
∀ {o₁ o₂}, Bounded t₁ o₁ x → Bounded t₂ x o₂ → Bounded t₁ o₁ o₂
| _, none, h₁, _ => h₁.weak_right
| _, some _, h₁, h₂ => h₁.mono_right (le_of_lt h₂.to_lt)
#align ordnode.bounded.trans_right Ordnode.Bounded.trans_right
theorem Bounded.mem_lt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t o x → All (· < x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.mem_lt.imp fun _ h => lt_trans h h₂.to_lt, h₂.to_lt, h₂.mem_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_lt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_lt
theorem Bounded.mem_gt : ∀ {t o} {x : α}, Bounded t x o → All (· > x) t
| nil, _, _, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₁.mem_gt, h₁.to_lt, h₂.mem_gt.imp fun _ => lt_trans h₁.to_lt⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.mem_gt Ordnode.Bounded.mem_gt
theorem Bounded.of_lt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil o₁ x → All (· < x) t → Bounded t o₁ x
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨_, al₂, al₃⟩ => ⟨h₁, h₂.of_lt al₂ al₃⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_lt Ordnode.Bounded.of_lt
theorem Bounded.of_gt :
∀ {t o₁ o₂} {x : α}, Bounded t o₁ o₂ → Bounded nil x o₂ → All (· > x) t → Bounded t x o₂
| nil, _, _, _, _, hn, _ => hn
| node _ _ _ _, _, _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂⟩, _, ⟨al₁, al₂, _⟩ => ⟨h₁.of_gt al₂ al₁, h₂⟩
#align ordnode.bounded.of_gt Ordnode.Bounded.of_gt
theorem Bounded.to_sep {t₁ t₂ o₁ o₂} {x : α}
(h₁ : Bounded t₁ o₁ (x : WithTop α)) (h₂ : Bounded t₂ (x : WithBot α) o₂) :
t₁.All fun y => t₂.All fun z : α => y < z := by
refine h₁.mem_lt.imp fun y yx => ?_
exact h₂.mem_gt.imp fun z xz => lt_trans yx xz
#align ordnode.bounded.to_sep Ordnode.Bounded.to_sep
end
section
variable [Preorder α]
structure Valid' (lo : WithBot α) (t : Ordnode α) (hi : WithTop α) : Prop where
ord : t.Bounded lo hi
sz : t.Sized
bal : t.Balanced
#align ordnode.valid' Ordnode.Valid'
#align ordnode.valid'.ord Ordnode.Valid'.ord
#align ordnode.valid'.sz Ordnode.Valid'.sz
#align ordnode.valid'.bal Ordnode.Valid'.bal
def Valid (t : Ordnode α) : Prop :=
Valid' ⊥ t ⊤
#align ordnode.valid Ordnode.Valid
theorem Valid'.mono_left {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' y t o) :
Valid' x t o :=
⟨h.1.mono_left xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_left Ordnode.Valid'.mono_left
theorem Valid'.mono_right {x y : α} (xy : x ≤ y) {t : Ordnode α} {o} (h : Valid' o t x) :
Valid' o t y :=
⟨h.1.mono_right xy, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.mono_right Ordnode.Valid'.mono_right
theorem Valid'.trans_left {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded t₁ o₁ x)
(H : Valid' x t₂ o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₂ o₂ :=
⟨h.trans_left H.1, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_left Ordnode.Valid'.trans_left
theorem Valid'.trans_right {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t₁ x)
(h : Bounded t₂ x o₂) : Valid' o₁ t₁ o₂ :=
⟨H.1.trans_right h, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.trans_right Ordnode.Valid'.trans_right
theorem Valid'.of_lt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x)
(h₂ : All (· < x) t) : Valid' o₁ t x :=
⟨H.1.of_lt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_lt Ordnode.Valid'.of_lt
theorem Valid'.of_gt {t : Ordnode α} {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ t o₂) (h₁ : Bounded nil x o₂)
(h₂ : All (· > x) t) : Valid' x t o₂ :=
⟨H.1.of_gt h₁ h₂, H.2, H.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.of_gt Ordnode.Valid'.of_gt
theorem Valid'.valid {t o₁ o₂} (h : @Valid' α _ o₁ t o₂) : Valid t :=
⟨h.1.weak, h.2, h.3⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.valid Ordnode.Valid'.valid
theorem valid'_nil {o₁ o₂} (h : Bounded nil o₁ o₂) : Valid' o₁ (@nil α) o₂ :=
⟨h, ⟨⟩, ⟨⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'_nil Ordnode.valid'_nil
theorem valid_nil : Valid (@nil α) :=
valid'_nil ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_nil Ordnode.valid_nil
theorem Valid'.node {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) (hs : s = size l + size r + 1) :
Valid' o₁ (@node α s l x r) o₂ :=
⟨⟨hl.1, hr.1⟩, ⟨hs, hl.2, hr.2⟩, ⟨H, hl.3, hr.3⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.node Ordnode.Valid'.node
theorem Valid'.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂}, Valid' o₁ t o₂ → @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (dual t) o₁
| .nil, o₁, o₂, h => valid'_nil h.1.dual
| .node _ l x r, o₁, o₂, ⟨⟨ol, Or⟩, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩, ⟨b, bl, br⟩⟩ =>
let ⟨ol', sl', bl'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨ol, sl, bl⟩
let ⟨or', sr', br'⟩ := Valid'.dual ⟨Or, sr, br⟩
⟨⟨or', ol'⟩, ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], sr', sl'⟩,
⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br', bl'⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual Ordnode.Valid'.dual
theorem Valid'.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} {o₁ o₂} : Valid' o₁ t o₂ ↔ @Valid' αᵒᵈ _ o₂ (.dual t) o₁ :=
⟨Valid'.dual, fun h => by
have := Valid'.dual h; rwa [dual_dual, OrderDual.Preorder.dual_dual] at this⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid'.dual_iff
theorem Valid.dual {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t → @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual
#align ordnode.valid.dual Ordnode.Valid.dual
theorem Valid.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Valid t ↔ @Valid αᵒᵈ _ (.dual t) :=
Valid'.dual_iff
#align ordnode.valid.dual_iff Ordnode.Valid.dual_iff
theorem Valid'.left {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' o₁ l x :=
⟨H.1.1, H.2.2.1, H.3.2.1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.left Ordnode.Valid'.left
theorem Valid'.right {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α s l x r) o₂) : Valid' x r o₂ :=
⟨H.1.2, H.2.2.2, H.3.2.2⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.right Ordnode.Valid'.right
nonrec theorem Valid.left {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid l :=
H.left.valid
#align ordnode.valid.left Ordnode.Valid.left
nonrec theorem Valid.right {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) : Valid r :=
H.right.valid
#align ordnode.valid.right Ordnode.Valid.right
theorem Valid.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Valid (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.2.1
#align ordnode.valid.size_eq Ordnode.Valid.size_eq
theorem Valid'.node' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node' α l x r) o₂ :=
hl.node hr H rfl
#align ordnode.valid'.node' Ordnode.Valid'.node'
theorem valid'_singleton {x : α} {o₁ o₂} (h₁ : Bounded nil o₁ x) (h₂ : Bounded nil x o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (singleton x : Ordnode α) o₂ :=
(valid'_nil h₁).node (valid'_nil h₂) (Or.inl zero_le_one) rfl
#align ordnode.valid'_singleton Ordnode.valid'_singleton
theorem valid_singleton {x : α} : Valid (singleton x : Ordnode α) :=
valid'_singleton ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩
#align ordnode.valid_singleton Ordnode.valid_singleton
theorem Valid'.node3L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size l + size m + 1) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3L α l x m y r) o₂ :=
(hl.node' hm H1).node' hr H2
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_l Ordnode.Valid'.node3L
theorem Valid'.node3R {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' y r o₂) (H1 : BalancedSz (size l) (size m + size r + 1))
(H2 : BalancedSz (size m) (size r)) : Valid' o₁ (@node3R α l x m y r) o₂ :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr H2) H1
#align ordnode.valid'.node3_r Ordnode.Valid'.node3R
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d) : c ≤ 3 * d := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ {b c d : ℕ} (mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
d ≤ 3 * c := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₁ : 3 * a ≤ b + c + 1 + d) (mr₂ : b + c + 1 ≤ 3 * d)
(mm₁ : b ≤ 3 * c) : a + b + 1 ≤ 3 * (c + d + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ {a b c d : ℕ} (lr₂ : 3 * (b + c + 1 + d) ≤ 16 * a + 9)
(mr₁ : 2 * d ≤ b + c + 1) (mm₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : c + d + 1 ≤ 3 * (a + b + 1) := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l_lemma₅ Ordnode.Valid'.node4L_lemma₅
theorem Valid'.node4L {l} {x : α} {m} {y : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hm : Valid' x m y)
(hr : Valid' (↑y) r o₂) (Hm : 0 < size m)
(H : size l = 0 ∧ size m = 1 ∧ size r ≤ 1 ∨
0 < size l ∧
ratio * size r ≤ size m ∧
delta * size l ≤ size m + size r ∧
3 * (size m + size r) ≤ 16 * size l + 9 ∧ size m ≤ delta * size r) :
Valid' o₁ (@node4L α l x m y r) o₂ := by
cases' m with s ml z mr; · cases Hm
suffices
BalancedSz (size l) (size ml) ∧
BalancedSz (size mr) (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size ml + 1) (size mr + size r + 1) from
Valid'.node' (hl.node' hm.left this.1) (hm.right.node' hr this.2.1) this.2.2
rcases H with (⟨l0, m1, r0⟩ | ⟨l0, mr₁, lr₁, lr₂, mr₂⟩)
· rw [hm.2.size_eq, Nat.succ_inj', add_eq_zero_iff] at m1
rw [l0, m1.1, m1.2]; revert r0; rcases size r with (_ | _ | _) <;>
[decide; decide; (intro r0; unfold BalancedSz delta; omega)]
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0] at mr₂; cases not_le_of_lt Hm mr₂
rw [hm.2.size_eq] at lr₁ lr₂ mr₁ mr₂
by_cases mm : size ml + size mr ≤ 1
· have r1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans mr₁ (Nat.succ_le_succ mm) : _ ≤ ratio * 1)) r0
rw [r1, add_assoc] at lr₁
have l1 :=
le_antisymm
((mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans lr₁ (add_le_add_right mm 2) : _ ≤ delta * 1))
l0
rw [l1, r1]
revert mm; cases size ml <;> cases size mr <;> intro mm
· decide
· rw [zero_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
decide
· rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); decide
· rw [Nat.succ_add] at mm; rcases mm with (_ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
rcases hm.3.1.resolve_left mm with ⟨mm₁, mm₂⟩
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size ml) with ml0 | ml0
· rw [ml0, mul_zero, Nat.le_zero] at mm₂
rw [ml0, mm₂] at mm; cases mm (by decide)
have : 2 * size l ≤ size ml + size mr + 1 := by
have := Nat.mul_le_mul_left ratio lr₁
rw [mul_left_comm, mul_add] at this
have := le_trans this (add_le_add_left mr₁ _)
rw [← Nat.succ_mul] at this
exact (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 this
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans this ?_)
rw [two_mul, Nat.succ_le_iff]
refine add_lt_add_of_lt_of_le ?_ mm₂
simpa using (mul_lt_mul_right ml0).2 (by decide : 1 < 3)
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.node4L_lemma₁ lr₂ mr₂ mm₁)
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₂ mr₂
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₃ mr₁ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₄ lr₁ mr₂ mm₁
· exact Valid'.node4L_lemma₅ lr₂ mr₁ mm₂
#align ordnode.valid'.node4_l Ordnode.Valid'.node4L
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (hb₂ : c ≤ 3 * b) : a ≤ 3 * b := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₁ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ {a b c : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * (b + c) ≤ 9 * a + 3) (h : b < 2 * c) :
b < 3 * a + 1 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₂ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ {a b c : ℕ} (H2 : 3 * a ≤ b + c) (h : b < 2 * c) : a + b < 3 * c := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₃ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃
theorem Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ {a b : ℕ} (H3 : 2 * b ≤ 9 * a + 3) : 3 * b ≤ 16 * a + 9 := by
omega
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l_lemma₄ Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄
theorem Valid'.rotateL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size l < size r)
(H3 : 2 * size r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateL α l x r) o₂ := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr; · cases H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq] at H3
replace H3 : 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 ∨ size rl + size rr ≤ 2 :=
H3.imp (@Nat.le_of_add_le_add_right _ 2 _) Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ
have H3_0 : size l = 0 → size rl + size rr ≤ 2 := by
intro l0; rw [l0] at H3
exact
(or_iff_right_of_imp fun h => (mul_le_mul_left (by decide)).1 (le_trans h (by decide))).1 H3
have H3p : size l > 0 → 2 * (size rl + size rr) ≤ 9 * size l + 3 := fun l0 : 1 ≤ size l =>
(or_iff_left_of_imp <| by omega).1 H3
have ablem : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, 1 ≤ a → a + b ≤ 2 → b ≤ 1 := by omega
have hlp : size l > 0 → ¬size rl + size rr ≤ 1 := fun l0 hb =>
absurd (le_trans (le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ l0) H2) hb) (by decide)
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs with h
· have rr0 : size rr > 0 :=
(mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).1 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) h : ratio * 0 < _)
suffices BalancedSz (size l) (size rl) ∧ BalancedSz (size l + size rl + 1) (size rr) by
exact hl.node3L hr.left hr.right this.1 this.2
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; replace H3 := H3_0 l0
have := hr.3.1
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0] at this ⊢
rw [le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this.symm) rr0]
decide
have rr1 : size rr = 1 := le_antisymm (ablem rl0 H3) rr0
rw [add_comm] at H3
rw [rr1, show size rl = 1 from le_antisymm (ablem rr0 H3) rl0]
decide
replace H3 := H3p l0
rcases hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0) with ⟨_, hb₂⟩
refine ⟨Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩, Or.inr ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₁ H2 hb₂
· exact Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Valid'.rotateL_lemma₂ H3 h)
· exact Valid'.rotateL_lemma₃ H2 h
· exact
le_trans hb₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _))
· rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rl) with rl0 | rl0
· rw [rl0, not_lt, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at h
replace h := h.resolve_left (by decide)
erw [rl0, h, Nat.le_zero, Nat.mul_eq_zero] at H2
rw [hr.2.size_eq, rl0, h, H2.resolve_left (by decide)] at H1
cases H1 (by decide)
refine hl.node4L hr.left hr.right rl0 ?_
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· replace H3 := H3_0 l0
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size rr) with rr0 | rr0
· have := hr.3.1
rw [rr0] at this
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (balancedSz_zero.1 this) rl0, rr0.symm ▸ zero_le_one⟩
exact Or.inl ⟨l0, le_antisymm (ablem rr0 <| by rwa [add_comm]) rl0, ablem rl0 H3⟩
exact
Or.inr ⟨l0, not_lt.1 h, H2, Valid'.rotateL_lemma₄ (H3p l0), (hr.3.1.resolve_left (hlp l0)).1⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_l Ordnode.Valid'.rotateL
theorem Valid'.rotateR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H1 : ¬size l + size r ≤ 1) (H2 : delta * size r < size l)
(H3 : 2 * size l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@rotateR α l x r) o₂ := by
refine Valid'.dual_iff.2 ?_
rw [dual_rotateR]
refine hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual ?_ ?_ ?_
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual, add_comm]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
· rwa [size_dual, size_dual]
#align ordnode.valid'.rotate_r Ordnode.Valid'.rotateR
theorem Valid'.balance'_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3)
(H₂ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inl h)
· exact hl.rotateL hr h h_1 H₁
· exact hl.rotateR hr h h_2 H₂
· exact hl.node' hr (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_2, not_lt.1 h_1⟩)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance'_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balance'_aux
theorem Valid'.balance'_lemma {α l l' r r'} (H1 : BalancedSz l' r')
(H2 : Nat.dist (@size α l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l') :
2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3 := by
suffices @size α r ≤ 3 * (size l + 1) by
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· apply Or.inr; rwa [l0] at this
change 1 ≤ _ at l0; apply Or.inl; omega
rcases H2 with (⟨hl, rfl⟩ | ⟨hr, rfl⟩) <;> rcases H1 with (h | ⟨_, h₂⟩)
· exact le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) (le_trans h (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
· exact
le_trans h₂
(Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ <| le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right _ _) (Nat.add_le_add_left hl _))
· exact
le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_left' _ _)
(le_trans (add_le_add hr (le_trans (Nat.le_add_left _ _) h)) (by omega))
· rw [Nat.mul_succ]
exact le_trans (Nat.dist_tri_right' _ _) (add_le_add h₂ (le_trans hr (by decide)))
#align ordnode.valid'.balance'_lemma Ordnode.Valid'.balance'_lemma
theorem Valid'.balance' {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance' α l x r) o₂ :=
let ⟨_, _, H1, H2⟩ := H
Valid'.balance'_aux hl hr (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1 H2) (Valid'.balance'_lemma H1.symm H2.symm)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance' Ordnode.Valid'.balance'
theorem Valid'.balance {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : ∃ l' r', BalancedSz l' r' ∧
(Nat.dist (size l) l' ≤ 1 ∧ size r = r' ∨ Nat.dist (size r) r' ≤ 1 ∧ size l = l')) :
Valid' o₁ (@balance α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]; exact hl.balance' hr H
#align ordnode.valid'.balance Ordnode.Valid'.balance
theorem Valid'.balanceL_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α l ≤ 9 * size r + 5 ∨ size l ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance hl.2 hr.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2]
refine hl.balance'_aux hr (Or.inl ?_) H₃
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size r) with r0 | r0
· rw [r0]; exact Nat.zero_le _
rcases Nat.eq_zero_or_pos (size l) with l0 | l0
· rw [l0]; exact le_trans (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ (H₁ l0)) (by decide)
replace H₂ : _ ≤ 3 * _ := H₂ l0 r0; omega
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_l_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL_aux
theorem Valid'.balanceL {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised l' (size l) ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised (size r) r' ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceL α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [balanceL_eq_balance' hl.3 hr.3 hl.2 hr.2 H]
refine hl.balance' hr ?_
rcases H with (⟨l', e, H⟩ | ⟨r', e, H⟩)
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inl ⟨e.dist_le', rfl⟩⟩
· exact ⟨_, _, H, Or.inr ⟨e.dist_le, rfl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_l Ordnode.Valid'.balanceL
theorem Valid'.balanceR_aux {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H₁ : size r = 0 → size l ≤ 1) (H₂ : 1 ≤ size r → 1 ≤ size l → size l ≤ delta * size r)
(H₃ : 2 * @size α r ≤ 9 * size l + 5 ∨ size r ≤ 3) : Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]
have := hr.dual.balanceL_aux hl.dual
rw [size_dual, size_dual] at this
exact this H₁ H₂ H₃
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_r_aux Ordnode.Valid'.balanceR_aux
theorem Valid'.balanceR {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂)
(H : (∃ l', Raised (size l) l' ∧ BalancedSz l' (size r)) ∨
∃ r', Raised r' (size r) ∧ BalancedSz (size l) r') :
Valid' o₁ (@balanceR α l x r) o₂ := by
rw [Valid'.dual_iff, dual_balanceR]; exact hr.dual.balanceL hl.dual (balance_sz_dual H)
#align ordnode.valid'.balance_r Ordnode.Valid'.balanceR
theorem Valid'.eraseMax_aux {s l x r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' o₁ (@eraseMax α (.node' l x r)) ↑(findMax' x r) ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMax (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H; clear this
induction' r with rs rl rx rr _ IHrr generalizing l x o₁
· exact ⟨H.left, rfl⟩
have := H.2.2.2.eq_node'; rw [this] at H ⊢
rcases IHrr H.right with ⟨h, e⟩
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL H.left h (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩), ?_⟩
rw [eraseMax, size_balanceL H.3.2.1 h.3 H.2.2.1 h.2 (Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, H.3.1⟩)]
rw [size_node, e]; rfl
#align ordnode.valid'.erase_max_aux Ordnode.Valid'.eraseMax_aux
theorem Valid'.eraseMin_aux {s l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (H : Valid' o₁ (.node s l x r) o₂) :
Valid' ↑(findMin' l x) (@eraseMin α (.node' l x r)) o₂ ∧
size (.node' l x r) = size (eraseMin (.node' l x r)) + 1 := by
have := H.dual.eraseMax_aux
rwa [← dual_node', size_dual, ← dual_eraseMin, size_dual, ← Valid'.dual_iff, findMax'_dual]
at this
#align ordnode.valid'.erase_min_aux Ordnode.Valid'.eraseMin_aux
theorem eraseMin.valid : ∀ {t}, @Valid α _ t → Valid (eraseMin t)
| nil, _ => valid_nil
| node _ l x r, h => by rw [h.2.eq_node']; exact h.eraseMin_aux.1.valid
#align ordnode.erase_min.valid Ordnode.eraseMin.valid
theorem eraseMax.valid {t} (h : @Valid α _ t) : Valid (eraseMax t) := by
rw [Valid.dual_iff, dual_eraseMax]; exact eraseMin.valid h.dual
#align ordnode.erase_max.valid Ordnode.eraseMax.valid
theorem Valid'.glue_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) (bal : BalancedSz (size l) (size r)) :
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (glue l r) = size l + size r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
cases' r with rs rl rx rr; · exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
dsimp [glue]; split_ifs
· rw [splitMax_eq]
· cases' Valid'.eraseMax_aux hl with v e
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceR v (hr.of_gt ?_ ?_) H, ?_⟩
· refine findMax'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil (a : WithTop α) o₂)
lx lr hl.1.2.to_nil (sep.2.2.imp ?_)
exact fun x h => hr.1.2.to_nil.mono_left (le_of_lt h.2.1)
· exact @findMax'_all _ (fun a => All (· > a) (.node rs rl rx rr)) lx lr sep.2.1 sep.2.2
· rw [size_balanceR v.3 hr.3 v.2 hr.2 H, add_right_comm, ← e, hl.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inl ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hl.2.eq_node'] at bal
· rw [splitMin_eq]
· cases' Valid'.eraseMin_aux hr with v e
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL (hl.of_lt ?_ ?_) v H, ?_⟩
· refine @findMin'_all (P := fun a : α => Bounded nil o₁ (a : WithBot α))
rl rx (sep.2.1.1.imp ?_) hr.1.1.to_nil
exact fun y h => hl.1.1.to_nil.mono_right (le_of_lt h)
· exact
@findMin'_all _ (fun a => All (· < a) (.node ls ll lx lr)) rl rx
(all_iff_forall.2 fun x hx => sep.imp fun y hy => all_iff_forall.1 hy.1 _ hx)
(sep.imp fun y hy => hy.2.1)
· rw [size_balanceL hl.3 v.3 hl.2 v.2 H, add_assoc, ← e, hr.2.1]; rfl
refine Or.inr ⟨_, Or.inr e, ?_⟩
rwa [hr.2.eq_node'] at bal
#align ordnode.valid'.glue_aux Ordnode.Valid'.glue_aux
theorem Valid'.glue {l} {x : α} {r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l x) (hr : Valid' x r o₂) :
BalancedSz (size l) (size r) →
Valid' o₁ (@glue α l r) o₂ ∧ size (@glue α l r) = size l + size r :=
Valid'.glue_aux (hl.trans_right hr.1) (hr.trans_left hl.1) (hl.1.to_sep hr.1)
#align ordnode.valid'.glue Ordnode.Valid'.glue
theorem Valid'.merge_lemma {a b c : ℕ} (h₁ : 3 * a < b + c + 1) (h₂ : b ≤ 3 * c) :
2 * (a + b) ≤ 9 * c + 5 := by omega
#align ordnode.valid'.merge_lemma Ordnode.Valid'.merge_lemma
theorem Valid'.merge_aux₁ {o₁ o₂ ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr t}
(hl : Valid' o₁ (@Ordnode.node α ls ll lx lr) o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ (.node rs rl rx rr) o₂)
(h : delta * ls < rs) (v : Valid' o₁ t rx) (e : size t = ls + size rl) :
Valid' o₁ (.balanceL t rx rr) o₂ ∧ size (.balanceL t rx rr) = ls + rs := by
rw [hl.2.1] at e
rw [hl.2.1, hr.2.1, delta] at h
rcases hr.3.1 with (H | ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩); · omega
suffices H₂ : _ by
suffices H₁ : _ by
refine ⟨Valid'.balanceL_aux v hr.right H₁ H₂ ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [e]; exact Or.inl (Valid'.merge_lemma h hr₁)
· rw [balanceL_eq_balance v.2 hr.2.2.2 H₁ H₂, balance_eq_balance' v.3 hr.3.2.2 v.2 hr.2.2.2,
size_balance' v.2 hr.2.2.2, e, hl.2.1, hr.2.1]
abel
· rw [e, add_right_comm]; rintro ⟨⟩
intro _ _; rw [e]; unfold delta at hr₂ ⊢; omega
#align ordnode.valid'.merge_aux₁ Ordnode.Valid'.merge_aux₁
theorem Valid'.merge_aux {l r o₁ o₂} (hl : Valid' o₁ l o₂) (hr : Valid' o₁ r o₂)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) :
Valid' o₁ (@merge α l r) o₂ ∧ size (merge l r) = size l + size r := by
induction' l with ls ll lx lr _ IHlr generalizing o₁ o₂ r
· exact ⟨hr, (zero_add _).symm⟩
induction' r with rs rl rx rr IHrl _ generalizing o₁ o₂
· exact ⟨hl, rfl⟩
rw [merge_node]; split_ifs with h h_1
· cases'
IHrl (hl.of_lt hr.1.1.to_nil <| sep.imp fun x h => h.2.1) hr.left
(sep.imp fun x h => h.1) with
v e
exact Valid'.merge_aux₁ hl hr h v e
· cases' IHlr hl.right (hr.of_gt hl.1.2.to_nil sep.2.1) sep.2.2 with v e
have := Valid'.merge_aux₁ hr.dual hl.dual h_1 v.dual
rw [size_dual, add_comm, size_dual, ← dual_balanceR, ← Valid'.dual_iff, size_dual,
add_comm rs] at this
exact this e
· refine Valid'.glue_aux hl hr sep (Or.inr ⟨not_lt.1 h_1, not_lt.1 h⟩)
#align ordnode.valid'.merge_aux Ordnode.Valid'.merge_aux
theorem Valid.merge {l r} (hl : Valid l) (hr : Valid r)
(sep : l.All fun x => r.All fun y => x < y) : Valid (@merge α l r) :=
(Valid'.merge_aux hl hr sep).1
#align ordnode.valid.merge Ordnode.Valid.merge
theorem insertWith.valid_aux [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) :
∀ {t o₁ o₂},
Valid' o₁ t o₂ →
Bounded nil o₁ x →
Bounded nil x o₂ →
Valid' o₁ (insertWith f x t) o₂ ∧ Raised (size t) (size (insertWith f x t))
| nil, o₁, o₂, _, bl, br => ⟨valid'_singleton bl br, Or.inr rfl⟩
| node sz l y r, o₁, o₂, h, bl, br => by
rw [insertWith, cmpLE]
split_ifs with h_1 h_2 <;> dsimp only
· rcases h with ⟨⟨lx, xr⟩, hs, hb⟩
rcases hf _ ⟨h_1, h_2⟩ with ⟨xf, fx⟩
refine
⟨⟨⟨lx.mono_right (le_trans h_2 xf), xr.mono_left (le_trans fx h_1)⟩, hs, hb⟩, Or.inl rfl⟩
· rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.left bl (lt_of_le_not_le h_1 h_2) with ⟨vl, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨vl.balanceL h.right H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceL vl.3 h.3.2.2 vl.2 h.2.2.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_right _).add_right _
exact Or.inl ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
· have : y < x := lt_of_le_not_le ((total_of (· ≤ ·) _ _).resolve_left h_1) h_1
rcases insertWith.valid_aux f x hf h.right this br with ⟨vr, e⟩
suffices H : _ by
refine ⟨h.left.balanceR vr H, ?_⟩
rw [size_balanceR h.3.2.1 vr.3 h.2.2.1 vr.2 H, h.2.size_eq]
exact (e.add_left _).add_right _
exact Or.inr ⟨_, e, h.3.1⟩
#align ordnode.insert_with.valid_aux Ordnode.insertWith.valid_aux
theorem insertWith.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (f : α → α) (x : α)
(hf : ∀ y, x ≤ y ∧ y ≤ x → x ≤ f y ∧ f y ≤ x) {t} (h : Valid t) : Valid (insertWith f x t) :=
(insertWith.valid_aux _ _ hf h ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩).1
#align ordnode.insert_with.valid Ordnode.insertWith.valid
theorem insert_eq_insertWith [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t, Ordnode.insert x t = insertWith (fun _ => x) x t
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
unfold Ordnode.insert insertWith; cases cmpLE x y <;> simp [insert_eq_insertWith]
#align ordnode.insert_eq_insert_with Ordnode.insert_eq_insertWith
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 1,550 | 1,552 | theorem insert.valid [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) {t} (h : Valid t) :
Valid (Ordnode.insert x t) := by |
rw [insert_eq_insertWith]; exact insertWith.valid _ _ (fun _ _ => ⟨le_rfl, le_rfl⟩) h
|
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
#align_import measure_theory.measure.lebesgue.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
#align real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id Real.volume_eq_stieltjes_id
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 75 | 76 | theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by |
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Defs
#align_import data.rat.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"550b58538991c8977703fdeb7c9d51a5aa27df11"
namespace Rat
open Rat
theorem num_dvd (a) {b : ℤ} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : (a /. b).num ∣ a := by
cases' e : a /. b with n d h c
rw [Rat.mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (mod_cast h)] at e
refine Int.natAbs_dvd.1 <| Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
c.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right ?_
have := congr_arg Int.natAbs e
simp only [Int.natAbs_mul, Int.natAbs_ofNat] at this; simp [this]
#align rat.num_dvd Rat.num_dvd
theorem den_dvd (a b : ℤ) : ((a /. b).den : ℤ) ∣ b := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp [b0]
cases' e : a /. b with n d h c
rw [mk'_eq_divInt, divInt_eq_iff b0 (ne_of_gt (Int.natCast_pos.2 (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h)))] at e
refine Int.dvd_natAbs.1 <| Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| c.symm.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left ?_
rw [← Int.natAbs_mul, ← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, Int.dvd_natAbs, ← e]; simp
#align rat.denom_dvd Rat.den_dvd
theorem num_den_mk {q : ℚ} {n d : ℤ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (qdf : q = n /. d) :
∃ c : ℤ, n = c * q.num ∧ d = c * q.den := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp [qdf]
have : q.num * d = n * ↑q.den := by
refine (divInt_eq_iff ?_ hd).mp ?_
· exact Int.natCast_ne_zero.mpr (Rat.den_nz _)
· rwa [num_divInt_den]
have hqdn : q.num ∣ n := by
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_dvd _ hd
refine ⟨n / q.num, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [Int.ediv_mul_cancel hqdn]
· refine Int.eq_mul_div_of_mul_eq_mul_of_dvd_left ?_ hqdn this
rw [qdf]
exact Rat.num_ne_zero.2 ((divInt_ne_zero hd).mpr hn)
#align rat.num_denom_mk Rat.num_den_mk
#noalign rat.mk_pnat_num
#noalign rat.mk_pnat_denom
theorem num_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).num = d.sign * n / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
rw [← Int.div_eq_ediv_of_dvd] <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
Int.zero_ediv, Int.ofNat_dvd_left, Nat.gcd_dvd_left, this]
#align rat.num_mk Rat.num_mk
theorem den_mk (n d : ℤ) : (n /. d).den = if d = 0 then 1 else d.natAbs / n.gcd d := by
have (m : ℕ) : Int.natAbs (m + 1) = m + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Int.natAbs_cast]
rcases d with ((_ | _) | _) <;>
simp [divInt, mkRat, Rat.normalize, Nat.succPNat, Int.sign, Int.gcd,
if_neg (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), this]
#align rat.denom_mk Rat.den_mk
#noalign rat.mk_pnat_denom_dvd
theorem add_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ + q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [add_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
#align rat.add_denom_dvd Rat.add_den_dvd
theorem mul_den_dvd (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) : (q₁ * q₂).den ∣ q₁.den * q₂.den := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
apply Nat.div_dvd_of_dvd
apply Nat.gcd_dvd_right
#align rat.mul_denom_dvd Rat.mul_den_dvd
theorem mul_num (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).num = q₁.num * q₂.num / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
#align rat.mul_num Rat.mul_num
theorem mul_den (q₁ q₂ : ℚ) :
(q₁ * q₂).den =
q₁.den * q₂.den / Nat.gcd (q₁.num * q₂.num).natAbs (q₁.den * q₂.den) := by
rw [mul_def, normalize_eq]
#align rat.mul_denom Rat.mul_den
theorem mul_self_num (q : ℚ) : (q * q).num = q.num * q.num := by
rw [mul_num, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Int.ofNat_one, Int.ediv_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
#align rat.mul_self_num Rat.mul_self_num
theorem mul_self_den (q : ℚ) : (q * q).den = q.den * q.den := by
rw [Rat.mul_den, Int.natAbs_mul, Nat.Coprime.gcd_eq_one, Nat.div_one]
exact (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced).mul (q.reduced.mul_right q.reduced)
#align rat.mul_self_denom Rat.mul_self_den
theorem add_num_den (q r : ℚ) :
q + r = (q.num * r.den + q.den * r.num : ℤ) /. (↑q.den * ↑r.den : ℤ) := by
have hqd : (q.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 q.den_pos
have hrd : (r.den : ℤ) ≠ 0 := Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.2 r.den_pos
conv_lhs => rw [← num_divInt_den q, ← num_divInt_den r, divInt_add_divInt _ _ hqd hrd]
rw [mul_comm r.num q.den]
#align rat.add_num_denom Rat.add_num_den
protected theorem inv_neg (q : ℚ) : (-q)⁻¹ = -q⁻¹ := by
rw [← num_divInt_den q]
simp only [Rat.neg_divInt, Rat.inv_divInt', eq_self_iff_true, Rat.divInt_neg]
#align rat.inv_neg Rat.inv_neg
theorem num_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
(a / b : ℚ).num = a := by
-- Porting note: was `lift b to ℕ using le_of_lt hb0`
rw [← Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hb0.le, ← Rat.divInt_eq_div,
← mk_eq_divInt _ _ (Int.natAbs_ne_zero.mpr hb0.ne') h]
#align rat.num_div_eq_of_coprime Rat.num_div_eq_of_coprime
theorem den_div_eq_of_coprime {a b : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (h : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs) :
((a / b : ℚ).den : ℤ) = b := by
-- Porting note: was `lift b to ℕ using le_of_lt hb0`
rw [← Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hb0.le, ← Rat.divInt_eq_div,
← mk_eq_divInt _ _ (Int.natAbs_ne_zero.mpr hb0.ne') h]
#align rat.denom_div_eq_of_coprime Rat.den_div_eq_of_coprime
theorem div_int_inj {a b c d : ℤ} (hb0 : 0 < b) (hd0 : 0 < d) (h1 : Nat.Coprime a.natAbs b.natAbs)
(h2 : Nat.Coprime c.natAbs d.natAbs) (h : (a : ℚ) / b = (c : ℚ) / d) : a = c ∧ b = d := by
apply And.intro
· rw [← num_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, num_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
· rw [← den_div_eq_of_coprime hb0 h1, h, den_div_eq_of_coprime hd0 h2]
#align rat.div_int_inj Rat.div_int_inj
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_div_self (n : ℤ) : ((n / n : ℤ) : ℚ) = n / n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp only [Int.cast_zero, Int.zero_div, zero_div, Int.ediv_zero]
· have : (n : ℚ) ≠ 0 := by rwa [← coe_int_inj] at hn
simp only [Int.ediv_self hn, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff, div_self this]
#align rat.coe_int_div_self Rat.intCast_div_self
@[norm_cast]
theorem natCast_div_self (n : ℕ) : ((n / n : ℕ) : ℚ) = n / n :=
intCast_div_self n
#align rat.coe_nat_div_self Rat.natCast_div_self
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Lemmas.lean | 213 | 216 | theorem intCast_div (a b : ℤ) (h : b ∣ a) : ((a / b : ℤ) : ℚ) = a / b := by |
rcases h with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [mul_comm b, Int.mul_ediv_assoc c (dvd_refl b), Int.cast_mul,
intCast_div_self, Int.cast_mul, mul_div_assoc]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Constructions
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.DenselyOrdered
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Uniformity Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {X ι : Type*}
theorem UniformSpace.ofDist_aux (ε : ℝ) (hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ δ > (0 : ℝ), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε :=
⟨ε / 2, half_pos hε, fun _x hx _y hy => add_halves ε ▸ add_lt_add hx hy⟩
def UniformSpace.ofDist (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofFun dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle ofDist_aux
#align uniform_space_of_dist UniformSpace.ofDist
-- Porting note: dropped the `dist_self` argument
abbrev Bornology.ofDist {α : Type*} (dist : α → α → ℝ) (dist_comm : ∀ x y, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : Bornology α :=
Bornology.ofBounded { s : Set α | ∃ C, ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → dist x y ≤ C }
⟨0, fun x hx y => hx.elim⟩ (fun s ⟨c, hc⟩ t h => ⟨c, fun x hx y hy => hc (h hx) (h hy)⟩)
(fun s hs t ht => by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· rwa [empty_union]
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨y, hy⟩
· rwa [union_empty]
rsuffices ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ z ∈ s ∪ t, dist x z ≤ C
· refine ⟨C + C, fun a ha b hb => (dist_triangle a x b).trans ?_⟩
simpa only [dist_comm] using add_le_add (hC _ ha) (hC _ hb)
rcases hs with ⟨Cs, hs⟩; rcases ht with ⟨Ct, ht⟩
refine ⟨max Cs (dist x y + Ct), fun z hz => hz.elim
(fun hz => (hs hx hz).trans (le_max_left _ _))
(fun hz => (dist_triangle x y z).trans <|
(add_le_add le_rfl (ht hy hz)).trans (le_max_right _ _))⟩)
fun z => ⟨dist z z, forall_eq.2 <| forall_eq.2 le_rfl⟩
#align bornology.of_dist Bornology.ofDistₓ
@[ext]
class Dist (α : Type*) where
dist : α → α → ℝ
#align has_dist Dist
export Dist (dist)
-- the uniform structure and the emetric space structure are embedded in the metric space structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
private theorem dist_nonneg' {α} {x y : α} (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z) : 0 ≤ dist x y :=
have : 0 ≤ 2 * dist x y :=
calc 0 = dist x x := (dist_self _).symm
_ ≤ dist x y + dist y x := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = 2 * dist x y := by rw [two_mul, dist_comm]
nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this two_pos
#noalign pseudo_metric_space.edist_dist_tac -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: restore
class PseudoMetricSpace (α : Type u) extends Dist α : Type u where
dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0
dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x
dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z
edist : α → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun x y => ENNReal.ofNNReal ⟨dist x y, dist_nonneg' _ ‹_› ‹_› ‹_›⟩
edist_dist : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y)
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add := by _
toUniformSpace : UniformSpace α := .ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
uniformity_dist : 𝓤 α = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } := by intros; rfl
toBornology : Bornology α := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets : (Bornology.cobounded α).sets =
{ s | ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x ∈ sᶜ, ∀ y ∈ sᶜ, dist x y ≤ C } := by intros; rfl
#align pseudo_metric_space PseudoMetricSpace
@[ext]
theorem PseudoMetricSpace.ext {α : Type*} {m m' : PseudoMetricSpace α}
(h : m.toDist = m'.toDist) : m = m' := by
cases' m with d _ _ _ ed hed U hU B hB
cases' m' with d' _ _ _ ed' hed' U' hU' B' hB'
obtain rfl : d = d' := h
congr
· ext x y : 2
rw [hed, hed']
· exact UniformSpace.ext (hU.trans hU'.symm)
· ext : 2
rw [← Filter.mem_sets, ← Filter.mem_sets, hB, hB']
#align pseudo_metric_space.ext PseudoMetricSpace.ext
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α]
attribute [instance] PseudoMetricSpace.toUniformSpace PseudoMetricSpace.toBornology
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 200) PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist : EDist α :=
⟨PseudoMetricSpace.edist⟩
#align pseudo_metric_space.to_has_edist PseudoMetricSpace.toEDist
def PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology {α : Type u} [TopologicalSpace α] (dist : α → α → ℝ)
(dist_self : ∀ x : α, dist x x = 0) (dist_comm : ∀ x y : α, dist x y = dist y x)
(dist_triangle : ∀ x y z : α, dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z)
(H : ∀ s : Set α, IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ ε > 0, ∀ y, dist x y < ε → y ∈ s) :
PseudoMetricSpace α :=
{ dist := dist
dist_self := dist_self
dist_comm := dist_comm
dist_triangle := dist_triangle
edist_dist := fun x y => by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace :=
(UniformSpace.ofDist dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle).replaceTopology <|
TopologicalSpace.ext_iff.2 fun s ↦ (H s).trans <| forall₂_congr fun x _ ↦
((UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun (exists_gt (0 : ℝ)) dist dist_self dist_comm dist_triangle
UniformSpace.ofDist_aux).comap (Prod.mk x)).mem_iff.symm
uniformity_dist := rfl
toBornology := Bornology.ofDist dist dist_comm dist_triangle
cobounded_sets := rfl }
#align pseudo_metric_space.of_dist_topology PseudoMetricSpace.ofDistTopology
@[simp]
theorem dist_self (x : α) : dist x x = 0 :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_self x
#align dist_self dist_self
theorem dist_comm (x y : α) : dist x y = dist y x :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_comm x y
#align dist_comm dist_comm
theorem edist_dist (x y : α) : edist x y = ENNReal.ofReal (dist x y) :=
PseudoMetricSpace.edist_dist x y
#align edist_dist edist_dist
theorem dist_triangle (x y z : α) : dist x z ≤ dist x y + dist y z :=
PseudoMetricSpace.dist_triangle x y z
#align dist_triangle dist_triangle
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/PseudoMetric.lean | 192 | 193 | theorem dist_triangle_left (x y z : α) : dist x y ≤ dist z x + dist z y := by |
rw [dist_comm z]; apply dist_triangle
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 969 | 982 | theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by |
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 300 | 300 | theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by | rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.DirectSum.Finsupp
#align_import ring_theory.tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88fcdc3da43943f5b01925deddaa5bf0c0e85e4e"
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A)
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
#align linear_map.base_change LinearMap.baseChange
variable {A}
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
#align linear_map.base_change_tmul LinearMap.baseChange_tmul
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
#align linear_map.base_change_eq_ltensor LinearMap.baseChange_eq_ltensor
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
#align linear_map.base_change_add LinearMap.baseChange_add
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 90 | 92 | theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by |
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
|
import Mathlib.Init.Core
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois
#align_import number_theory.cyclotomic.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4b05d3f4f0601dca8abf99c4ec99187682ed0bba"
open Polynomial Algebra FiniteDimensional Set
universe u v w z
variable (n : ℕ+) (S T : Set ℕ+) (A : Type u) (B : Type v) (K : Type w) (L : Type z)
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
variable [Field K] [Field L] [Algebra K L]
noncomputable section
@[mk_iff]
class IsCyclotomicExtension : Prop where
exists_prim_root {n : ℕ+} (ha : n ∈ S) : ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n
adjoin_roots : ∀ x : B, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1}
#align is_cyclotomic_extension IsCyclotomicExtension
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension
section Basic
theorem iff_adjoin_eq_top :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔
(∀ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S → ∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧
adjoin A {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun _ => h.exists_prim_root, Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 h.adjoin_roots⟩, fun h =>
⟨h.1 _, Algebra.eq_top_iff.1 h.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_adjoin_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_adjoin_eq_top
theorem iff_singleton :
IsCyclotomicExtension {n} A B ↔
(∃ r : B, IsPrimitiveRoot r n) ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ adjoin A {b : B | b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
simp [isCyclotomicExtension_iff]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_singleton IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_singleton
theorem empty [h : IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ := by
simpa [Algebra.eq_top_iff, isCyclotomicExtension_iff] using h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.empty IsCyclotomicExtension.empty
theorem singleton_one [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B] : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤ :=
Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => by
simpa [adjoin_singleton_one] using ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 x
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one
variable {A B}
theorem singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension ∅ A B := by
-- Porting note: Lean3 is able to infer `A`.
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2
⟨fun s hs => by simp at hs, _root_.eq_top_iff.2 fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [← h] at hx
simpa using hx
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top
variable (A B)
theorem trans (C : Type w) [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [Algebra B C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
[hS : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] [hT : IsCyclotomicExtension T B C]
(h : Function.Injective (algebraMap B C)) : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A C := by
refine ⟨fun hn => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· cases' hn with hn hn
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).1 hn
refine ⟨algebraMap B C b, ?_⟩
exact hb.map_of_injective h
· exact ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hT).1 hn
· refine adjoin_induction (((isCyclotomicExtension_iff T B _).1 hT).2 x)
(fun c ⟨n, hn⟩ => subset_adjoin ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩) (fun b => ?_)
(fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.add_mem _ hx hy) fun x y hx hy => Subalgebra.mul_mem _ hx hy
let f := IsScalarTower.toAlgHom A B C
have hb : f b ∈ (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}).map f :=
⟨b, ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 hS).2 b, rfl⟩
rw [IsScalarTower.toAlgHom_apply, ← adjoin_image] at hb
refine adjoin_mono (fun y hy => ?_) hb
obtain ⟨b₁, ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, h₁⟩⟩ := hy
exact ⟨n, ⟨mem_union_left T hn.1, by rw [← h₁, ← AlgHom.map_pow, hn.2, AlgHom.map_one]⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.trans IsCyclotomicExtension.trans
@[nontriviality]
theorem subsingleton_iff [Subsingleton B] : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ S = { } ∨ S = {1} := by
have : Subsingleton (Subalgebra A B) := inferInstance
constructor
· rintro ⟨hprim, -⟩
rw [← subset_singleton_iff_eq]
intro t ht
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := hprim ht
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
exact mod_cast hζ.unique (IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton ζ)
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
-- Porting note: `R := A` was not needed.
· exact ⟨fun h => h.elim, fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
· rw [iff_singleton]
exact ⟨⟨0, IsPrimitiveRoot.of_subsingleton 0⟩,
fun x => by convert (mem_top (R := A) : x ∈ ⊤)⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.subsingleton_iff IsCyclotomicExtension.subsingleton_iff
theorem union_right [h : IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ T) A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension T (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) B := by
have : {b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∪ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} =
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ S ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} ∪
{b : B | ∃ n : ℕ+, n ∈ T ∧ b ^ (n : ℕ) = 1} := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· rintro x ⟨n, hn₁ | hn₂, hnpow⟩
· left; exact ⟨n, hn₁, hnpow⟩
· right; exact ⟨n, hn₂, hnpow⟩
· rintro x (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· exact ⟨n, Or.inl hn.1, hn.2⟩
· exact ⟨n, Or.inr hn.1, hn.2⟩
refine ⟨fun hn => ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ A _).1 h).1 (mem_union_right S hn), fun b => ?_⟩
replace h := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).2 b
rwa [this, adjoin_union_eq_adjoin_adjoin, Subalgebra.mem_restrictScalars] at h
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_right IsCyclotomicExtension.union_right
theorem union_left [h : IsCyclotomicExtension T A B] (hS : S ⊆ T) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A (adjoin A {b : B | ∃ a : ℕ+, a ∈ S ∧ b ^ (a : ℕ) = 1}) := by
refine ⟨@fun n hn => ?_, fun b => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨b, hb⟩ := ((isCyclotomicExtension_iff _ _ _).1 h).1 (hS hn)
refine ⟨⟨b, subset_adjoin ⟨n, hn, hb.pow_eq_one⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rwa [← IsPrimitiveRoot.coe_submonoidClass_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
· convert mem_top (R := A) (x := b)
rw [← adjoin_adjoin_coe_preimage, preimage_setOf_eq]
norm_cast
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.union_left IsCyclotomicExtension.union_left
variable {n S}
theorem of_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) [H : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B] :
IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_union, mem_singleton_iff] at hs
obtain hs | rfl := hs
· exact H.exists_prim_root hs
· obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hS
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h m hm
obtain ⟨ζ, hζ⟩ := H.exists_prim_root hm
refine ⟨ζ ^ (x : ℕ), ?_⟩
convert hζ.pow_of_dvd x.ne_zero (dvd_mul_left (x : ℕ) s)
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, Nat.mul_div_left, PNat.pos]
· refine _root_.eq_top_iff.2 ?_
rw [← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top S A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hx
exact ⟨m, ⟨Or.inr hm.1, hm.2⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.of_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.of_union_of_dvd
theorem iff_union_of_dvd (h : ∀ s ∈ S, n ∣ s) (hS : S.Nonempty) :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {n}) A B := by
refine
⟨fun H => of_union_of_dvd A B h hS, fun H => (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· exact H.exists_prim_root (subset_union_left hs)
· rw [_root_.eq_top_iff, ← ((iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A B).1 H).2]
refine adjoin_mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [union_singleton, mem_insert_iff, mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨m, rfl | hm, hxpow⟩ := hx
· obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy, ?_⟩⟩
obtain ⟨z, rfl⟩ := h y hy
simp only [PNat.mul_coe, pow_mul, hxpow, one_pow]
· exact ⟨m, ⟨hm, hxpow⟩⟩
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_of_dvd IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_of_dvd
variable (n S)
theorem iff_union_singleton_one :
IsCyclotomicExtension S A B ↔ IsCyclotomicExtension (S ∪ {1}) A B := by
obtain hS | rfl := S.eq_empty_or_nonempty.symm
· exact iff_union_of_dvd _ _ (fun s _ => one_dvd _) hS
rw [empty_union]
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => ?_⟩
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => ⟨1, by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hs]⟩, ?_⟩
simp [adjoin_singleton_one, empty]
· refine (iff_adjoin_eq_top _ A _).2 ⟨fun s hs => (not_mem_empty s hs).elim, ?_⟩
simp [@singleton_one A B _ _ _ H]
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.iff_union_singleton_one IsCyclotomicExtension.iff_union_singleton_one
variable {A B}
theorem singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (h : (⊥ : Subalgebra A B) = ⊤) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B := by
convert (iff_union_singleton_one _ A _).1 (singleton_zero_of_bot_eq_top h)
simp
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top
theorem singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap A B)) :
IsCyclotomicExtension {1} A B :=
singleton_one_of_bot_eq_top (surjective_algebraMap_iff.1 h).symm
#align is_cyclotomic_extension.singleton_one_of_algebra_map_bijective IsCyclotomicExtension.singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective
variable (A B)
protected
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Basic.lean | 282 | 287 | theorem equiv {C : Type*} [CommRing C] [Algebra A C] [h : IsCyclotomicExtension S A B]
(f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) : IsCyclotomicExtension S A C := by |
letI : Algebra B C := f.toAlgHom.toRingHom.toAlgebra
haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} B C := singleton_one_of_algebraMap_bijective f.surjective
haveI : IsScalarTower A B C := IsScalarTower.of_algHom f.toAlgHom
exact (iff_union_singleton_one _ _ _).2 (trans S {1} A B C f.injective)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Group
import Mathlib.Logic.Encodable.Lattice
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Encodable
open scoped Topology
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] {m m' : M}
variable {G : Type*} [CommGroup G] {g g' : G}
-- don't declare [TopologicalAddGroup G] here as some results require [UniformAddGroup G] instead
section Nat
section Monoid
namespace HasProd
@[to_additive "If `f : ℕ → M` has sum `m`, then the partial sums `∑ i ∈ range n, f i` converge
to `m`."]
theorem tendsto_prod_nat {f : ℕ → M} (h : HasProd f m) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∏ i ∈ range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 m) :=
h.comp tendsto_finset_range
#align has_sum.tendsto_sum_nat HasSum.tendsto_sum_nat
@[to_additive "If `f : ℕ → M` is summable, then the partial sums `∑ i ∈ range n, f i` converge
to `∑' i, f i`."]
theorem Multipliable.tendsto_prod_tprod_nat {f : ℕ → M} (h : Multipliable f) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∏ i ∈ range n, f i) atTop (𝓝 (∏' i, f i)) :=
tendsto_prod_nat h.hasProd
section tprod
variable [T2Space M] {α β γ : Type*}
section Encodable
variable [Encodable β]
@[to_additive "You can compute a sum over an encodable type by summing over the natural numbers and
taking a supremum. This is useful for outer measures."]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/NatInt.lean | 124 | 132 | theorem tprod_iSup_decode₂ [CompleteLattice α] (m : α → M) (m0 : m ⊥ = 1) (s : β → α) :
∏' i : ℕ, m (⨆ b ∈ decode₂ β i, s b) = ∏' b : β, m (s b) := by |
rw [← tprod_extend_one (@encode_injective β _)]
refine tprod_congr fun n ↦ ?_
rcases em (n ∈ Set.range (encode : β → ℕ)) with ⟨a, rfl⟩ | hn
· simp [encode_injective.extend_apply]
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ hn]
rw [← decode₂_ne_none_iff, ne_eq, not_not] at hn
simp [hn, m0]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightNhds
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section OrderTopology
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [LinearOrder α] [LinearOrder β] [OrderTopology α]
[OrderTopology β]
theorem IsLUB.frequently_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≤] a, x ∈ s := by
rcases hs with ⟨a', ha'⟩
intro h
rcases (ha.1 ha').eq_or_lt with (rfl | ha'a)
· exact h.self_of_nhdsWithin le_rfl ha'
· rcases (mem_nhdsWithin_Iic_iff_exists_Ioc_subset' ha'a).1 h with ⟨b, hba, hb⟩
rcases ha.exists_between hba with ⟨b', hb's, hb'⟩
exact hb hb' hb's
#align is_lub.frequently_mem IsLUB.frequently_mem
theorem IsLUB.frequently_nhds_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s :=
(ha.frequently_mem hs).filter_mono inf_le_left
#align is_lub.frequently_nhds_mem IsLUB.frequently_nhds_mem
theorem IsGLB.frequently_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≥] a, x ∈ s :=
IsLUB.frequently_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) ha hs
#align is_glb.frequently_mem IsGLB.frequently_mem
theorem IsGLB.frequently_nhds_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s :=
(ha.frequently_mem hs).filter_mono inf_le_left
#align is_glb.frequently_nhds_mem IsGLB.frequently_nhds_mem
theorem IsLUB.mem_closure {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ∈ closure s :=
(ha.frequently_nhds_mem hs).mem_closure
#align is_lub.mem_closure IsLUB.mem_closure
theorem IsGLB.mem_closure {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ∈ closure s :=
(ha.frequently_nhds_mem hs).mem_closure
#align is_glb.mem_closure IsGLB.mem_closure
theorem IsLUB.nhdsWithin_neBot {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
NeBot (𝓝[s] a) :=
mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot.1 (ha.mem_closure hs)
#align is_lub.nhds_within_ne_bot IsLUB.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem IsGLB.nhdsWithin_neBot : ∀ {a : α} {s : Set α}, IsGLB s a → s.Nonempty → NeBot (𝓝[s] a) :=
IsLUB.nhdsWithin_neBot (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align is_glb.nhds_within_ne_bot IsGLB.nhdsWithin_neBot
theorem isLUB_of_mem_nhds {s : Set α} {a : α} {f : Filter α} (hsa : a ∈ upperBounds s) (hsf : s ∈ f)
[NeBot (f ⊓ 𝓝 a)] : IsLUB s a :=
⟨hsa, fun b hb =>
not_lt.1 fun hba =>
have : s ∩ { a | b < a } ∈ f ⊓ 𝓝 a := inter_mem_inf hsf (IsOpen.mem_nhds (isOpen_lt' _) hba)
let ⟨_x, ⟨hxs, hxb⟩⟩ := Filter.nonempty_of_mem this
have : b < b := lt_of_lt_of_le hxb <| hb hxs
lt_irrefl b this⟩
#align is_lub_of_mem_nhds isLUB_of_mem_nhds
theorem isLUB_of_mem_closure {s : Set α} {a : α} (hsa : a ∈ upperBounds s) (hsf : a ∈ closure s) :
IsLUB s a := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_clusterPt, ClusterPt, inf_comm] at hsf
exact isLUB_of_mem_nhds hsa (mem_principal_self s)
#align is_lub_of_mem_closure isLUB_of_mem_closure
theorem isGLB_of_mem_nhds :
∀ {s : Set α} {a : α} {f : Filter α}, a ∈ lowerBounds s → s ∈ f → NeBot (f ⊓ 𝓝 a) → IsGLB s a :=
isLUB_of_mem_nhds (α := αᵒᵈ)
#align is_glb_of_mem_nhds isGLB_of_mem_nhds
theorem isGLB_of_mem_closure {s : Set α} {a : α} (hsa : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hsf : a ∈ closure s) :
IsGLB s a :=
isLUB_of_mem_closure (α := αᵒᵈ) hsa hsf
#align is_glb_of_mem_closure isGLB_of_mem_closure
theorem IsLUB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ]
{f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (ha : IsLUB s a)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : b ∈ upperBounds (f '' s) := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
replace ha := ha.inter_Ici_of_mem hx
haveI := ha.nhdsWithin_neBot ⟨x, hx, le_rfl⟩
refine ge_of_tendsto (hb.mono_left (nhdsWithin_mono a (inter_subset_left (t := Ici x)))) ?_
exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun y hy => hf hx hy.1 hy.2
#align is_lub.mem_upper_bounds_of_tendsto IsLUB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto
-- For a version of this theorem in which the convergence considered on the domain `α` is as `x : α`
-- tends to infinity, rather than tending to a point `x` in `α`, see `isLUB_of_tendsto_atTop`
theorem IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ] {f : α → γ}
{s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : IsLUB (f '' s) b :=
haveI := ha.nhdsWithin_neBot hs
⟨ha.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto hf hb, fun _b' hb' =>
le_of_tendsto hb (mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin fun _ hx => hb' <| mem_image_of_mem _ hx)⟩
#align is_lub.is_lub_of_tendsto IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto
theorem IsGLB.mem_lowerBounds_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ]
{f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : MonotoneOn f s) (ha : IsGLB s a)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : b ∈ lowerBounds (f '' s) :=
IsLUB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf.dual ha hb
#align is_glb.mem_lower_bounds_of_tendsto IsGLB.mem_lowerBounds_of_tendsto
-- For a version of this theorem in which the convergence considered on the domain `α` is as
-- `x : α` tends to negative infinity, rather than tending to a point `x` in `α`, see
-- `isGLB_of_tendsto_atBot`
theorem IsGLB.isGLB_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ] {f : α → γ}
{s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : MonotoneOn f s) :
IsGLB s a → s.Nonempty → Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → IsGLB (f '' s) b :=
IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf.dual
#align is_glb.is_glb_of_tendsto IsGLB.isGLB_of_tendsto
theorem IsLUB.mem_lowerBounds_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ]
{f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (ha : IsLUB s a)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : b ∈ lowerBounds (f '' s) :=
IsLUB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf ha hb
#align is_lub.mem_lower_bounds_of_tendsto IsLUB.mem_lowerBounds_of_tendsto
theorem IsLUB.isGLB_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ] :
∀ {f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ},
AntitoneOn f s → IsLUB s a → s.Nonempty → Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → IsGLB (f '' s) b :=
IsLUB.isLUB_of_tendsto (γ := γᵒᵈ)
#align is_lub.is_glb_of_tendsto IsLUB.isGLB_of_tendsto
theorem IsGLB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ]
{f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ} (hf : AntitoneOn f s) (ha : IsGLB s a)
(hb : Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b)) : b ∈ upperBounds (f '' s) :=
IsGLB.mem_lowerBounds_of_tendsto (γ := γᵒᵈ) hf ha hb
#align is_glb.mem_upper_bounds_of_tendsto IsGLB.mem_upperBounds_of_tendsto
theorem IsGLB.isLUB_of_tendsto [Preorder γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [OrderClosedTopology γ] :
∀ {f : α → γ} {s : Set α} {a : α} {b : γ},
AntitoneOn f s → IsGLB s a → s.Nonempty → Tendsto f (𝓝[s] a) (𝓝 b) → IsLUB (f '' s) b :=
IsGLB.isGLB_of_tendsto (γ := γᵒᵈ)
#align is_glb.is_lub_of_tendsto IsGLB.isLUB_of_tendsto
theorem IsLUB.mem_of_isClosed {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty)
(sc : IsClosed s) : a ∈ s :=
sc.closure_subset <| ha.mem_closure hs
#align is_lub.mem_of_is_closed IsLUB.mem_of_isClosed
alias IsClosed.isLUB_mem := IsLUB.mem_of_isClosed
#align is_closed.is_lub_mem IsClosed.isLUB_mem
theorem IsGLB.mem_of_isClosed {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hs : s.Nonempty)
(sc : IsClosed s) : a ∈ s :=
sc.closure_subset <| ha.mem_closure hs
#align is_glb.mem_of_is_closed IsGLB.mem_of_isClosed
alias IsClosed.isGLB_mem := IsGLB.mem_of_isClosed
#align is_closed.is_glb_mem IsClosed.isGLB_mem
theorem IsLUB.exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto_of_not_mem {t : Set α} {x : α}
[IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 x)] (htx : IsLUB t x) (not_mem : x ∉ t) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
∃ u : ℕ → α, StrictMono u ∧ (∀ n, u n < x) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) ∧ ∀ n, u n ∈ t := by
obtain ⟨v, hvx, hvt⟩ := exists_seq_forall_of_frequently (htx.frequently_mem ht)
replace hvx := hvx.mono_right nhdsWithin_le_nhds
have hvx' : ∀ {n}, v n < x := (htx.1 (hvt _)).lt_of_ne (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem (hvt _) not_mem)
have : ∀ k, ∀ᶠ l in atTop, v k < v l := fun k => hvx.eventually (lt_mem_nhds hvx')
choose N hN hvN using fun k => ((eventually_gt_atTop k).and (this k)).exists
refine ⟨fun k => v (N^[k] 0), strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun _ => ?_, fun _ => hvx',
hvx.comp (strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun _ => ?_).tendsto_atTop, fun _ => hvt _⟩
· rw [iterate_succ_apply']; exact hvN _
· rw [iterate_succ_apply']; exact hN _
#align is_lub.exists_seq_strict_mono_tendsto_of_not_mem IsLUB.exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto_of_not_mem
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/IsLUB.lean | 186 | 192 | theorem IsLUB.exists_seq_monotone_tendsto {t : Set α} {x : α} [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓝 x)]
(htx : IsLUB t x) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
∃ u : ℕ → α, Monotone u ∧ (∀ n, u n ≤ x) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) ∧ ∀ n, u n ∈ t := by |
by_cases h : x ∈ t
· exact ⟨fun _ => x, monotone_const, fun n => le_rfl, tendsto_const_nhds, fun _ => h⟩
· rcases htx.exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto_of_not_mem h ht with ⟨u, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, hu.1.monotone, fun n => (hu.2.1 n).le, hu.2.2⟩
|
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.schur_complement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a176cb1219e300e85793d44583dede42377b51af"
variable {l m n α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open scoped Matrix
section CommRing
variable [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommRing α]
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix l m α)
(D : Matrix l n α) [Invertible A] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 0 (C * ⅟ A) 1 * fromBlocks A 0 0 (D - C * ⅟ A * B) *
fromBlocks 1 (⅟ A * B) 0 1 := by
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, zero_add,
Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_self_assoc,
Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, Matrix.mul_assoc, add_sub_cancel]
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix l n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 * fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D *
fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 :=
(Matrix.reindex (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)).injective <| by
simpa [reindex_apply, Equiv.sumComm_symm, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n m), ←
submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n l), Equiv.sumComm_apply,
fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap] using fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ D C B A
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂
section Det
theorem det_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det A * det (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
rw [fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A := A), det_mul, det_mul, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_fromBlocks_zero₁₂, det_one, det_one, one_mul, one_mul, mul_one]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₁₁ (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks 1 B C D).det = det (D - C * B) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₁₁, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks_one₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks_one₁₁
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SchurComplement.lean | 406 | 413 | theorem det_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det D * det (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by |
have : fromBlocks A B C D =
(fromBlocks D C B A).submatrix (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) := by
ext (i j)
cases i <;> cases j <;> rfl
rw [this, det_submatrix_equiv_self, det_fromBlocks₁₁]
|
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Equiv
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Bool.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Tactic.Substs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Conv
#align_import logic.equiv.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
open Function
universe u v w z
variable {α : Sort u} {β : Sort v} {γ : Sort w}
structure Equiv (α : Sort*) (β : Sort _) where
protected toFun : α → β
protected invFun : β → α
protected left_inv : LeftInverse invFun toFun
protected right_inv : RightInverse invFun toFun
#align equiv Equiv
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ " => Equiv
@[coe]
def EquivLike.toEquiv {F} [EquivLike F α β] (f : F) : α ≃ β where
toFun := f
invFun := EquivLike.inv f
left_inv := EquivLike.left_inv f
right_inv := EquivLike.right_inv f
instance {F} [EquivLike F α β] : CoeTC F (α ≃ β) :=
⟨EquivLike.toEquiv⟩
abbrev Equiv.Perm (α : Sort*) :=
Equiv α α
#align equiv.perm Equiv.Perm
namespace Equiv
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
inv := Equiv.invFun
left_inv := Equiv.left_inv
right_inv := Equiv.right_inv
coe_injective' e₁ e₂ h₁ h₂ := by cases e₁; cases e₂; congr
instance : FunLike (α ≃ β) α β where
coe := Equiv.toFun
coe_injective' := DFunLike.coe_injective
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_coe {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
((e : α ≃ β) : α → β) = e := rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : (Equiv.mk f g l r : α → β) = f :=
rfl
#align equiv.coe_fn_mk Equiv.coe_fn_mk
theorem coe_fn_injective : @Function.Injective (α ≃ β) (α → β) (fun e => e) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective'
#align equiv.coe_fn_injective Equiv.coe_fn_injective
protected theorem coe_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ β} : (e₁ : α → β) = e₂ ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
@DFunLike.coe_fn_eq _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂
#align equiv.coe_inj Equiv.coe_inj
@[ext] theorem ext {f g : Equiv α β} (H : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := DFunLike.ext f g H
#align equiv.ext Equiv.ext
protected theorem congr_arg {f : Equiv α β} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f
#align equiv.congr_arg Equiv.congr_arg
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : Equiv α β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
#align equiv.congr_fun Equiv.congr_fun
theorem ext_iff {f g : Equiv α β} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x := DFunLike.ext_iff
#align equiv.ext_iff Equiv.ext_iff
@[ext] theorem Perm.ext {σ τ : Equiv.Perm α} (H : ∀ x, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ := Equiv.ext H
#align equiv.perm.ext Equiv.Perm.ext
protected theorem Perm.congr_arg {f : Equiv.Perm α} {x x' : α} : x = x' → f x = f x' :=
Equiv.congr_arg
#align equiv.perm.congr_arg Equiv.Perm.congr_arg
protected theorem Perm.congr_fun {f g : Equiv.Perm α} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
Equiv.congr_fun h x
#align equiv.perm.congr_fun Equiv.Perm.congr_fun
theorem Perm.ext_iff {σ τ : Equiv.Perm α} : σ = τ ↔ ∀ x, σ x = τ x := Equiv.ext_iff
#align equiv.perm.ext_iff Equiv.Perm.ext_iff
@[refl] protected def refl (α : Sort*) : α ≃ α := ⟨id, id, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align equiv.refl Equiv.refl
instance inhabited' : Inhabited (α ≃ α) := ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩
@[symm]
protected def symm (e : α ≃ β) : β ≃ α := ⟨e.invFun, e.toFun, e.right_inv, e.left_inv⟩
#align equiv.symm Equiv.symm
def Simps.symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) : β → α := e.symm
#align equiv.simps.symm_apply Equiv.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections Equiv (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Porting note:
-- Added these lemmas as restatements of `left_inv` and `right_inv`,
-- which use the coercions.
-- We might even consider switching the names, and having these as a public API.
theorem left_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.LeftInverse e.symm e := e.left_inv
theorem right_inv' (e : α ≃ β) : Function.RightInverse e.symm e := e.right_inv
@[trans]
protected def trans (e₁ : α ≃ β) (e₂ : β ≃ γ) : α ≃ γ :=
⟨e₂ ∘ e₁, e₁.symm ∘ e₂.symm, e₂.left_inv.comp e₁.left_inv, e₂.right_inv.comp e₁.right_inv⟩
#align equiv.trans Equiv.trans
@[simps]
instance : Trans Equiv Equiv Equiv where
trans := Equiv.trans
-- Porting note: this is not a syntactic tautology any more because
-- the coercion from `e` to a function is now `DFunLike.coe` not `e.toFun`
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem toFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.toFun = e := rfl
#align equiv.to_fun_as_coe Equiv.toFun_as_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps] theorem invFun_as_coe (e : α ≃ β) : e.invFun = e.symm := rfl
#align equiv.inv_fun_as_coe Equiv.invFun_as_coe
protected theorem injective (e : α ≃ β) : Injective e := EquivLike.injective e
#align equiv.injective Equiv.injective
protected theorem surjective (e : α ≃ β) : Surjective e := EquivLike.surjective e
#align equiv.surjective Equiv.surjective
protected theorem bijective (e : α ≃ β) : Bijective e := EquivLike.bijective e
#align equiv.bijective Equiv.bijective
protected theorem subsingleton (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton α :=
e.injective.subsingleton
#align equiv.subsingleton Equiv.subsingleton
protected theorem subsingleton.symm (e : α ≃ β) [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton β :=
e.symm.injective.subsingleton
#align equiv.subsingleton.symm Equiv.subsingleton.symm
theorem subsingleton_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Subsingleton α ↔ Subsingleton β :=
⟨fun _ => e.symm.subsingleton, fun _ => e.subsingleton⟩
#align equiv.subsingleton_congr Equiv.subsingleton_congr
instance equiv_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
instance equiv_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : Subsingleton (α ≃ β) :=
⟨fun f _ => Equiv.ext fun _ => @Subsingleton.elim _ (Equiv.subsingleton.symm f) _ _⟩
instance permUnique [Subsingleton α] : Unique (Perm α) :=
uniqueOfSubsingleton (Equiv.refl α)
theorem Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : e = Equiv.refl α :=
Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align equiv.perm.subsingleton_eq_refl Equiv.Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl
protected def decidableEq (e : α ≃ β) [DecidableEq β] : DecidableEq α :=
e.injective.decidableEq
#align equiv.decidable_eq Equiv.decidableEq
theorem nonempty_congr (e : α ≃ β) : Nonempty α ↔ Nonempty β := Nonempty.congr e e.symm
#align equiv.nonempty_congr Equiv.nonempty_congr
protected theorem nonempty (e : α ≃ β) [Nonempty β] : Nonempty α := e.nonempty_congr.mpr ‹_›
#align equiv.nonempty Equiv.nonempty
protected def inhabited [Inhabited β] (e : α ≃ β) : Inhabited α := ⟨e.symm default⟩
#align equiv.inhabited Equiv.inhabited
protected def unique [Unique β] (e : α ≃ β) : Unique α := e.symm.surjective.unique
#align equiv.unique Equiv.unique
protected def cast {α β : Sort _} (h : α = β) : α ≃ β :=
⟨cast h, cast h.symm, fun _ => by cases h; rfl, fun _ => by cases h; rfl⟩
#align equiv.cast Equiv.cast
@[simp] theorem coe_fn_symm_mk (f : α → β) (g l r) : ((Equiv.mk f g l r).symm : β → α) = g := rfl
#align equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk
@[simp] theorem coe_refl : (Equiv.refl α : α → α) = id := rfl
#align equiv.coe_refl Equiv.coe_refl
theorem Perm.coe_subsingleton {α : Type*} [Subsingleton α] (e : Perm α) : (e : α → α) = id := by
rw [Perm.subsingleton_eq_refl e, coe_refl]
#align equiv.perm.coe_subsingleton Equiv.Perm.coe_subsingleton
-- Porting note: marking this as `@[simp]` because `simp` doesn't fire on `coe_refl`
-- in an expression such as `Equiv.refl a x`
@[simp] theorem refl_apply (x : α) : Equiv.refl α x = x := rfl
#align equiv.refl_apply Equiv.refl_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_trans (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) : (f.trans g : α → γ) = g ∘ f := rfl
#align equiv.coe_trans Equiv.coe_trans
-- Porting note: marking this as `@[simp]` because `simp` doesn't fire on `coe_trans`
-- in an expression such as `Equiv.trans f g x`
@[simp] theorem trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : α) : (f.trans g) a = g (f a) := rfl
#align equiv.trans_apply Equiv.trans_apply
@[simp] theorem apply_symm_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : β) : e (e.symm x) = x := e.right_inv x
#align equiv.apply_symm_apply Equiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem symm_apply_apply (e : α ≃ β) (x : α) : e.symm (e x) = x := e.left_inv x
#align equiv.symm_apply_apply Equiv.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem symm_comp_self (e : α ≃ β) : e.symm ∘ e = id := funext e.symm_apply_apply
#align equiv.symm_comp_self Equiv.symm_comp_self
@[simp] theorem self_comp_symm (e : α ≃ β) : e ∘ e.symm = id := funext e.apply_symm_apply
#align equiv.self_comp_symm Equiv.self_comp_symm
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.apply_coe_symm_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : β) :
e ((e : α ≃ β).symm x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).apply_symm_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_apply_apply {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) (x : α) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm (e x) = x :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_apply_apply x
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.coe_symm_comp_self {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
(e : α ≃ β).symm ∘ e = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).symm_comp_self
@[simp] lemma _root_.EquivLike.self_comp_coe_symm {F} [EquivLike F α β] (e : F) :
e ∘ (e : α ≃ β).symm = id :=
(e : α ≃ β).self_comp_symm
@[simp] theorem symm_trans_apply (f : α ≃ β) (g : β ≃ γ) (a : γ) :
(f.trans g).symm a = f.symm (g.symm a) := rfl
#align equiv.symm_trans_apply Equiv.symm_trans_apply
-- The `simp` attribute is needed to make this a `dsimp` lemma.
-- `simp` will always rewrite with `Equiv.symm_symm` before this has a chance to fire.
@[simp, nolint simpNF] theorem symm_symm_apply (f : α ≃ β) (b : α) : f.symm.symm b = f b := rfl
#align equiv.symm_symm_apply Equiv.symm_symm_apply
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq (f : α ≃ β) {x y : α} : f x = f y ↔ x = y := EquivLike.apply_eq_iff_eq f
#align equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq
theorem apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply {x : α} {y : β} (f : α ≃ β) : f x = y ↔ x = f.symm y := by
conv_lhs => rw [← apply_symm_apply f y]
rw [apply_eq_iff_eq]
#align equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply Equiv.apply_eq_iff_eq_symm_apply
@[simp] theorem cast_apply {α β} (h : α = β) (x : α) : Equiv.cast h x = cast h x := rfl
#align equiv.cast_apply Equiv.cast_apply
@[simp] theorem cast_symm {α β} (h : α = β) : (Equiv.cast h).symm = Equiv.cast h.symm := rfl
#align equiv.cast_symm Equiv.cast_symm
@[simp] theorem cast_refl {α} (h : α = α := rfl) : Equiv.cast h = Equiv.refl α := rfl
#align equiv.cast_refl Equiv.cast_refl
@[simp] theorem cast_trans {α β γ} (h : α = β) (h2 : β = γ) :
(Equiv.cast h).trans (Equiv.cast h2) = Equiv.cast (h.trans h2) :=
ext fun x => by substs h h2; rfl
#align equiv.cast_trans Equiv.cast_trans
| Mathlib/Logic/Equiv/Defs.lean | 338 | 339 | theorem cast_eq_iff_heq {α β} (h : α = β) {a : α} {b : β} : Equiv.cast h a = b ↔ HEq a b := by |
subst h; simp [coe_refl]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.roots_of_unity.minpoly from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdeecc0d03cd40f7a165e6cf00a4d2286db599f"
open minpoly Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CommRing
variable {n : ℕ} {K : Type*} [CommRing K] {μ : K} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot μ n)
-- Porting note: `hpos` was in the `variable` line, with an `omit` in mathlib3 just after this
-- declaration. For some reason, in Lean4, `hpos` gets included also in the declarations below,
-- even if it is not used in the proof.
theorem isIntegral (hpos : 0 < n) : IsIntegral ℤ μ := by
use X ^ n - 1
constructor
· exact monic_X_pow_sub_C 1 (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
· simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, eval₂_one, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_sub,
sub_self]
#align is_primitive_root.is_integral IsPrimitiveRoot.isIntegral
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K] [CharZero K]
theorem minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one : minpoly ℤ μ ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | h0)
· simp
apply minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (isIntegral h h0)
simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, aeval_X_pow, eq_intCast, Int.cast_one,
aeval_one, AlgHom.map_sub, sub_self]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_X_pow_sub_one IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one
theorem separable_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Separable (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) := by
have hdvd : map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
convert RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
(minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one h)
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, coe_mapRingHom, map_X, map_one]
refine Separable.of_dvd (separable_X_pow_sub_C 1 ?_ one_ne_zero) hdvd
by_contra hzero
exact hdiv ((ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd n p).1 hzero)
#align is_primitive_root.separable_minpoly_mod IsPrimitiveRoot.separable_minpoly_mod
theorem squarefree_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Squarefree (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) :=
(separable_minpoly_mod h hdiv).squarefree
#align is_primitive_root.squarefree_minpoly_mod IsPrimitiveRoot.squarefree_minpoly_mod
theorem minpoly_dvd_expand {p : ℕ} (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
minpoly ℤ μ ∣ expand ℤ p (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp_all
letI : IsIntegrallyClosed ℤ := GCDMonoid.toIsIntegrallyClosed
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (h.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, coe_expand, ← comp, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_comp, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X,
eval_comp, eval_pow, eval_X, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← aeval_def]
exact minpoly.aeval _ _
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_expand IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_expand
theorem minpoly_dvd_pow_mod {p : ℕ} [hprime : Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) ^ p := by
set Q := minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)
have hfrob :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) Q ^ p = map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (expand ℤ p Q) := by
rw [← ZMod.expand_card, map_expand]
rw [hfrob]
apply RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
exact minpoly_dvd_expand h hdiv
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_pow_mod IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_pow_mod
theorem minpoly_dvd_mod_p {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) :=
(squarefree_minpoly_mod h hdiv).isRadical _ _ (minpoly_dvd_pow_mod h hdiv)
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_dvd_mod_p IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_dvd_mod_p
theorem minpoly_eq_pow {p : ℕ} [hprime : Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
minpoly ℤ μ = minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p) := by
classical
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp_all
have hpos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
by_contra hdiff
set P := minpoly ℤ μ
set Q := minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)
have Pmonic : P.Monic := minpoly.monic (h.isIntegral hpos)
have Qmonic : Q.Monic := minpoly.monic ((h.pow_of_prime hprime.1 hdiv).isIntegral hpos)
have Pirr : Irreducible P := minpoly.irreducible (h.isIntegral hpos)
have Qirr : Irreducible Q := minpoly.irreducible ((h.pow_of_prime hprime.1 hdiv).isIntegral hpos)
have PQprim : IsPrimitive (P * Q) := Pmonic.isPrimitive.mul Qmonic.isPrimitive
have prod : P * Q ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
rw [IsPrimitive.Int.dvd_iff_map_cast_dvd_map_cast (P * Q) (X ^ n - 1) PQprim
(monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : ℤ) (ne_of_gt hpos)).isPrimitive,
Polynomial.map_mul]
refine IsCoprime.mul_dvd ?_ ?_ ?_
· have aux := IsPrimitive.Int.irreducible_iff_irreducible_map_cast Pmonic.isPrimitive
refine (dvd_or_coprime _ _ (aux.1 Pirr)).resolve_left ?_
rw [map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Pmonic]
intro hdiv
refine hdiff (eq_of_monic_of_associated Pmonic Qmonic ?_)
exact associated_of_dvd_dvd hdiv (Pirr.dvd_symm Qirr hdiv)
· apply (map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Pmonic).2
exact minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one h
· apply (map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Qmonic).2
exact minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one (pow_of_prime h hprime.1 hdiv)
replace prod := RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p))) prod
rw [coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_one,
Polynomial.map_pow, map_X] at prod
obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := minpoly_dvd_mod_p h hdiv
rw [hR, ← mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← sq, Polynomial.map_pow] at prod
have habs : map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P ^ 2 ∣ map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P ^ 2 * R := by
use R
replace habs :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (PartENat.coe_lt_coe.2 one_lt_two)
(multiplicity.le_multiplicity_of_pow_dvd (dvd_trans habs prod))
have hfree : Squarefree (X ^ n - 1 : (ZMod p)[X]) :=
(separable_X_pow_sub_C 1 (fun h => hdiv <| (ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd n p).1 h)
one_ne_zero).squarefree
cases'
(multiplicity.squarefree_iff_multiplicity_le_one (X ^ n - 1)).1 hfree
(map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P) with
hle hunit
· rw [Nat.cast_one] at habs; exact hle.not_lt habs
· replace hunit := degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit hunit
rw [degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) _] at hunit
· exact (minpoly.degree_pos (isIntegral h hpos)).ne' hunit
simp only [Pmonic, eq_intCast, Monic.leadingCoeff, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff,
one_ne_zero]
#align is_primitive_root.minpoly_eq_pow IsPrimitiveRoot.minpoly_eq_pow
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Minpoly.lean | 175 | 193 | theorem minpoly_eq_pow_coprime {m : ℕ} (hcop : Nat.Coprime m n) :
minpoly ℤ μ = minpoly ℤ (μ ^ m) := by |
revert n hcop
refine UniqueFactorizationMonoid.induction_on_prime m ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro h hn
congr
simpa [(Nat.coprime_zero_left _).mp hn] using h
· intro u hunit _ _
congr
simp [Nat.isUnit_iff.mp hunit]
· intro a p _ hprime
intro hind h hcop
rw [hind h (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_left hcop)]; clear hind
replace hprime := hprime.nat_prime
have hdiv := (Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hprime).1 (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_right hcop)
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
rw [minpoly_eq_pow (h.pow_of_coprime a (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_left hcop)) hdiv]
congr 1
ring
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
#align_import algebra.euclidean_domain.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ee7b9f9a9ac2a8d9f04ea39bbfe6b1a3be053b38"
universe u
class EuclideanDomain (R : Type u) extends CommRing R, Nontrivial R where
protected quotient : R → R → R
protected quotient_zero : ∀ a, quotient a 0 = 0
protected remainder : R → R → R
protected quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq : ∀ a b, b * quotient a b + remainder a b = a
protected r : R → R → Prop
r_wellFounded : WellFounded r
protected remainder_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → r (remainder a b) b
mul_left_not_lt : ∀ (a) {b}, b ≠ 0 → ¬r (a * b) a
#align euclidean_domain EuclideanDomain
#align euclidean_domain.quotient EuclideanDomain.quotient
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_zero EuclideanDomain.quotient_zero
#align euclidean_domain.remainder EuclideanDomain.remainder
#align euclidean_domain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq
#align euclidean_domain.r EuclideanDomain.r
#align euclidean_domain.r_well_founded EuclideanDomain.r_wellFounded
#align euclidean_domain.remainder_lt EuclideanDomain.remainder_lt
#align euclidean_domain.mul_left_not_lt EuclideanDomain.mul_left_not_lt
namespace EuclideanDomain
variable {R : Type u} [EuclideanDomain R]
local infixl:50 " ≺ " => EuclideanDomain.r
local instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation R where
wf := r_wellFounded
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Div R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.quotient⟩
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 70) : Mod R :=
⟨EuclideanDomain.remainder⟩
theorem div_add_mod (a b : R) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
EuclideanDomain.quotient_mul_add_remainder_eq _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod
theorem mod_add_div (a b : R) : a % b + b * (a / b) = a :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (div_add_mod _ _)
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div
theorem mod_add_div' (m k : R) : m % k + m / k * k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mod_add_div _ _
#align euclidean_domain.mod_add_div' EuclideanDomain.mod_add_div'
theorem div_add_mod' (m k : R) : m / k * k + m % k = m := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact div_add_mod _ _
#align euclidean_domain.div_add_mod' EuclideanDomain.div_add_mod'
theorem mod_eq_sub_mul_div {R : Type*} [EuclideanDomain R] (a b : R) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
calc
a % b = b * (a / b) + a % b - b * (a / b) := (add_sub_cancel_left _ _).symm
_ = a - b * (a / b) := by rw [div_add_mod]
#align euclidean_domain.mod_eq_sub_mul_div EuclideanDomain.mod_eq_sub_mul_div
theorem mod_lt : ∀ (a) {b : R}, b ≠ 0 → a % b ≺ b :=
EuclideanDomain.remainder_lt
#align euclidean_domain.mod_lt EuclideanDomain.mod_lt
theorem mul_right_not_lt {a : R} (b) (h : a ≠ 0) : ¬a * b ≺ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact mul_left_not_lt b h
#align euclidean_domain.mul_right_not_lt EuclideanDomain.mul_right_not_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : R) : a % 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_mul, zero_add] using div_add_mod a 0
#align euclidean_domain.mod_zero EuclideanDomain.mod_zero
theorem lt_one (a : R) : a ≺ (1 : R) → a = 0 :=
haveI := Classical.dec
not_imp_not.1 fun h => by simpa only [one_mul] using mul_left_not_lt 1 h
#align euclidean_domain.lt_one EuclideanDomain.lt_one
theorem val_dvd_le : ∀ a b : R, b ∣ a → a ≠ 0 → ¬a ≺ b
| _, b, ⟨d, rfl⟩, ha => mul_left_not_lt b (mt (by rintro rfl; exact mul_zero _) ha)
#align euclidean_domain.val_dvd_le EuclideanDomain.val_dvd_le
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : R) : a / 0 = 0 :=
EuclideanDomain.quotient_zero a
#align euclidean_domain.div_zero EuclideanDomain.div_zero
section
open scoped Classical
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem GCD.induction {P : R → R → Prop} (a b : R) (H0 : ∀ x, P 0 x)
(H1 : ∀ a b, a ≠ 0 → P (b % a) a → P a b) : P a b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by
-- Porting note: required for hygiene, the equation compiler introduces a dummy variable `x`
-- See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/270676-lean4/topic/unnecessarily.20tombstoned.20argument/near/314573315
change P a b
exact a0.symm ▸ H0 b
else
have _ := mod_lt b a0
H1 _ _ a0 (GCD.induction (b % a) a H0 H1)
termination_by a
#align euclidean_domain.gcd.induction EuclideanDomain.GCD.induction
end
section GCD
variable [DecidableEq R]
def gcd (a b : R) : R :=
if a0 : a = 0 then b
else
have _ := mod_lt b a0
gcd (b % a) a
termination_by a
#align euclidean_domain.gcd EuclideanDomain.gcd
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/EuclideanDomain/Defs.lean | 209 | 211 | theorem gcd_zero_left (a : R) : gcd 0 a = a := by |
rw [gcd]
exact if_pos rfl
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Trace
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Norm
#align_import ring_theory.discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
universe u v w z
open scoped Matrix
open Matrix FiniteDimensional Fintype Polynomial Finset IntermediateField
namespace Algebra
variable (A : Type u) {B : Type v} (C : Type z) {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [CommRing C] [Algebra A C]
section Discr
-- Porting note: using `[DecidableEq ι]` instead of `by classical...` did not work in
-- mathlib3.
noncomputable def discr (A : Type u) {B : Type v} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
[Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) := (traceMatrix A b).det
#align algebra.discr Algebra.discr
theorem discr_def [Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) : discr A b = (traceMatrix A b).det := rfl
variable {A C} in
theorem discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv [Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) (f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) :
Algebra.discr A b = Algebra.discr A (f ∘ b) := by
rw [discr_def]; congr; ext
simp_rw [traceMatrix_apply, traceForm_apply, Function.comp, ← map_mul f, trace_eq_of_algEquiv]
#align algebra.discr_def Algebra.discr_def
variable {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι'] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι']
section Field
variable (K : Type u) {L : Type v} (E : Type z) [Field K] [Field L] [Field E]
variable [Algebra K L] [Algebra K E]
variable [Module.Finite K L] [IsAlgClosed E]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Discriminant.lean | 136 | 139 | theorem discr_not_zero_of_basis [IsSeparable K L] (b : Basis ι K L) :
discr K b ≠ 0 := by |
rw [discr_def, traceMatrix_of_basis, ← LinearMap.BilinForm.nondegenerate_iff_det_ne_zero]
exact traceForm_nondegenerate _ _
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.fin_range from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
universe u
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_finRange (n : ℕ) : ((finRange n) : List (Fin n)).map (Fin.val) = List.range n := by
simp_rw [finRange, map_pmap, pmap_eq_map]
exact List.map_id _
#align list.map_coe_fin_range List.map_coe_finRange
theorem finRange_succ_eq_map (n : ℕ) : finRange n.succ = 0 :: (finRange n).map Fin.succ := by
apply map_injective_iff.mpr Fin.val_injective
rw [map_cons, map_coe_finRange, range_succ_eq_map, Fin.val_zero, ← map_coe_finRange, map_map,
map_map]
simp only [Function.comp, Fin.val_succ]
#align list.fin_range_succ_eq_map List.finRange_succ_eq_map
theorem finRange_succ (n : ℕ) :
finRange n.succ = (finRange n |>.map Fin.castSucc |>.concat (.last _)) := by
apply map_injective_iff.mpr Fin.val_injective
simp [range_succ, Function.comp_def]
-- Porting note: `map_nth_le` moved to `List.finRange_map_get` in Data.List.Range
theorem ofFn_eq_pmap {n} {f : Fin n → α} :
ofFn f = pmap (fun i hi => f ⟨i, hi⟩) (range n) fun _ => mem_range.1 := by
rw [pmap_eq_map_attach]
exact ext_get (by simp) fun i hi1 hi2 => by simp [get_ofFn f ⟨i, hi1⟩]
#align list.of_fn_eq_pmap List.ofFn_eq_pmap
theorem ofFn_id (n) : ofFn id = finRange n :=
ofFn_eq_pmap
#align list.of_fn_id List.ofFn_id
| Mathlib/Data/List/FinRange.lean | 54 | 55 | theorem ofFn_eq_map {n} {f : Fin n → α} : ofFn f = (finRange n).map f := by |
rw [← ofFn_id, map_ofFn, Function.comp_id]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
#align_import data.polynomial.coeff from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2651125b48fc5c170ab1111afd0817c903b1fc6c"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
open Finsupp Finset AddMonoidAlgebra
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {n m : ℕ}
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
section Coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (p + q) n = coeff p n + coeff q n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
rcases q with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_add, coeff]
exact Finsupp.add_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_add Polynomial.coeff_add
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp]
theorem coeff_bit0 (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : coeff (bit0 p) n = bit0 (coeff p n) := by simp [bit0]
#align polynomial.coeff_bit0 Polynomial.coeff_bit0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (r • p) n = r • coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, coeff]
exact Finsupp.smul_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_smul Polynomial.coeff_smul
theorem support_smul [SMulZeroClass S R] (r : S) (p : R[X]) :
support (r • p) ⊆ support p := by
intro i hi
simp? [mem_support_iff] at hi ⊢ says simp only [mem_support_iff, coeff_smul, ne_eq] at hi ⊢
contrapose! hi
simp [hi]
#align polynomial.support_smul Polynomial.support_smul
open scoped Pointwise in
theorem card_support_mul_le : (p * q).support.card ≤ p.support.card * q.support.card := by
calc (p * q).support.card
_ = (p.toFinsupp * q.toFinsupp).support.card := by rw [← support_toFinsupp, toFinsupp_mul]
_ ≤ (p.toFinsupp.support + q.toFinsupp.support).card :=
Finset.card_le_card (AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p.toFinsupp q.toFinsupp)
_ ≤ p.support.card * q.support.card := Finset.card_image₂_le ..
@[simps]
def lsum {R A M : Type*} [Semiring R] [Semiring A] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R A] [Module R M]
(f : ℕ → A →ₗ[R] M) : A[X] →ₗ[R] M where
toFun p := p.sum (f · ·)
map_add' p q := sum_add_index p q _ (fun n => (f n).map_zero) fun n _ _ => (f n).map_add _ _
map_smul' c p := by
-- Porting note: added `dsimp only`; `beta_reduce` alone is not sufficient
dsimp only
rw [sum_eq_of_subset (f · ·) (fun n => (f n).map_zero) (support_smul c p)]
simp only [sum_def, Finset.smul_sum, coeff_smul, LinearMap.map_smul, RingHom.id_apply]
#align polynomial.lsum Polynomial.lsum
#align polynomial.lsum_apply Polynomial.lsum_apply
variable (R)
def lcoeff (n : ℕ) : R[X] →ₗ[R] R where
toFun p := coeff p n
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q n
map_smul' r p := coeff_smul r p n
#align polynomial.lcoeff Polynomial.lcoeff
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem lcoeff_apply (n : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : lcoeff R n f = coeff f n :=
rfl
#align polynomial.lcoeff_apply Polynomial.lcoeff_apply
@[simp]
theorem finset_sum_coeff {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (∑ b ∈ s, f b) n = ∑ b ∈ s, coeff (f b) n :=
map_sum (lcoeff R n) _ _
#align polynomial.finset_sum_coeff Polynomial.finset_sum_coeff
lemma coeff_list_sum (l : List R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
l.sum.coeff n = (l.map (lcoeff R n)).sum :=
map_list_sum (lcoeff R n) _
lemma coeff_list_sum_map {ι : Type*} (l : List ι) (f : ι → R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(l.map f).sum.coeff n = (l.map (fun a => (f a).coeff n)).sum := by
simp_rw [coeff_list_sum, List.map_map, Function.comp, lcoeff_apply]
theorem coeff_sum [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (f : ℕ → R → S[X]) :
coeff (p.sum f) n = p.sum fun a b => coeff (f a b) n := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [Polynomial.sum, support, coeff]`.
simp [Polynomial.sum, support_ofFinsupp, coeff_ofFinsupp]
#align polynomial.coeff_sum Polynomial.coeff_sum
theorem coeff_mul (p q : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (p * q) n = ∑ x ∈ antidiagonal n, coeff p x.1 * coeff q x.2 := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩; rcases q with ⟨q⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q n _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
#align polynomial.coeff_mul Polynomial.coeff_mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_coeff_zero (p q : R[X]) : coeff (p * q) 0 = coeff p 0 * coeff q 0 := by simp [coeff_mul]
#align polynomial.mul_coeff_zero Polynomial.mul_coeff_zero
@[simps]
def constantCoeff : R[X] →+* R where
toFun p := coeff p 0
map_one' := coeff_one_zero
map_mul' := mul_coeff_zero
map_zero' := coeff_zero 0
map_add' p q := coeff_add p q 0
#align polynomial.constant_coeff Polynomial.constantCoeff
#align polynomial.constant_coeff_apply Polynomial.constantCoeff_apply
theorem isUnit_C {x : R} : IsUnit (C x) ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h => (congr_arg IsUnit coeff_C_zero).mp (h.map <| @constantCoeff R _), fun h => h.map C⟩
#align polynomial.is_unit_C Polynomial.isUnit_C
theorem coeff_mul_X_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (p * X) 0 = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_X_zero Polynomial.coeff_mul_X_zero
theorem coeff_X_mul_zero (p : R[X]) : coeff (X * p) 0 = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.coeff_X_mul_zero Polynomial.coeff_X_mul_zero
theorem coeff_C_mul_X_pow (x : R) (k n : ℕ) :
coeff (C x * X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then x else 0 := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial]
congr 1
simp [eq_comm]
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow
theorem coeff_C_mul_X (x : R) (n : ℕ) : coeff (C x * X : R[X]) n = if n = 1 then x else 0 := by
rw [← pow_one X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (p : R[X]) : coeff (C a * p) n = a * coeff p n := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.single_zero_mul_apply p a n
#align polynomial.coeff_C_mul Polynomial.coeff_C_mul
theorem C_mul' (a : R) (f : R[X]) : C a * f = a • f := by
ext
rw [coeff_C_mul, coeff_smul, smul_eq_mul]
#align polynomial.C_mul' Polynomial.C_mul'
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_C (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) (a : R) : coeff (p * C a) n = coeff p n * a := by
rcases p with ⟨p⟩
simp_rw [← monomial_zero_left, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, coeff]
exact AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_zero_apply p a n
#align polynomial.coeff_mul_C Polynomial.coeff_mul_C
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_natCast {a k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : R[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : R) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_natCast_mul {a k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : R[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_ofNat {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff (p * (no_index (OfNat.ofNat a) : R[X])) k = coeff p k * OfNat.ofNat a := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] lemma coeff_ofNat_mul {a k : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo a] :
coeff ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat a) : R[X]) * p) k = OfNat.ofNat a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp] lemma coeff_mul_intCast [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff (p * (a : S[X])) k = coeff p k * (↑a : S) := coeff_mul_C _ _ _
@[simp] lemma coeff_intCast_mul [Ring S] {p : S[X]} {a : ℤ} {k : ℕ} :
coeff ((a : S[X]) * p) k = a * coeff p k := coeff_C_mul _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_pow (k n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ k : R[X]) n = if n = k then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [one_mul, RingHom.map_one, ← coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.coeff_X_pow Polynomial.coeff_X_pow
theorem coeff_X_pow_self (n : ℕ) : coeff (X ^ n : R[X]) n = 1 := by simp
#align polynomial.coeff_X_pow_self Polynomial.coeff_X_pow_self
section Fewnomials
open Finset
theorem support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (hkm : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m) = {k, m} := by
apply subset_antisymm (support_binomial' k m x y)
simp_rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm, if_neg hkm.symm, mul_zero, zero_add,
add_zero, Ne, hx, hy, not_false_eq_true, and_true]
#align polynomial.support_binomial Polynomial.support_binomial
theorem support_trinomial {k m n : ℕ} (hkm : k < m) (hmn : m < n) {x y z : R} (hx : x ≠ 0)
(hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m + C z * X ^ n) = {k, m, n} := by
apply subset_antisymm (support_trinomial' k m n x y z)
simp_rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff, mem_support_iff, coeff_add, coeff_C_mul,
coeff_X_pow_self, mul_one, coeff_X_pow, if_neg hkm.ne, if_neg hkm.ne', if_neg hmn.ne,
if_neg hmn.ne', if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne, if_neg (hkm.trans hmn).ne', mul_zero, add_zero,
zero_add, Ne, hx, hy, hz, not_false_eq_true, and_true]
#align polynomial.support_trinomial Polynomial.support_trinomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Coeff.lean | 243 | 245 | theorem card_support_binomial {k m : ℕ} (h : k ≠ m) {x y : R} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
card (support (C x * X ^ k + C y * X ^ m)) = 2 := by |
rw [support_binomial h hx hy, card_insert_of_not_mem (mt mem_singleton.mp h), card_singleton]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Support
import Mathlib.Order.WellFoundedSet
#align_import ring_theory.hahn_series from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a484a7d0eade4e1268f4fb402859b6686037f965"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Finset Function
open scoped Classical
noncomputable section
@[ext]
structure HahnSeries (Γ : Type*) (R : Type*) [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R] where
coeff : Γ → R
isPWO_support' : (Function.support coeff).IsPWO
#align hahn_series HahnSeries
variable {Γ : Type*} {R : Type*}
namespace HahnSeries
section Zero
variable [PartialOrder Γ] [Zero R]
theorem coeff_injective : Injective (coeff : HahnSeries Γ R → Γ → R) :=
HahnSeries.ext
#align hahn_series.coeff_injective HahnSeries.coeff_injective
@[simp]
theorem coeff_inj {x y : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = y.coeff ↔ x = y :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff
#align hahn_series.coeff_inj HahnSeries.coeff_inj
nonrec def support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : Set Γ :=
support x.coeff
#align hahn_series.support HahnSeries.support
@[simp]
theorem isPWO_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsPWO :=
x.isPWO_support'
#align hahn_series.is_pwo_support HahnSeries.isPWO_support
@[simp]
theorem isWF_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : x.support.IsWF :=
x.isPWO_support.isWF
#align hahn_series.is_wf_support HahnSeries.isWF_support
@[simp]
theorem mem_support (x : HahnSeries Γ R) (a : Γ) : a ∈ x.support ↔ x.coeff a ≠ 0 :=
Iff.refl _
#align hahn_series.mem_support HahnSeries.mem_support
instance : Zero (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨{ coeff := 0
isPWO_support' := by simp }⟩
instance : Inhabited (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨fun a b => a.ext b (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff {a : Γ} : (0 : HahnSeries Γ R).coeff a = 0 :=
rfl
#align hahn_series.zero_coeff HahnSeries.zero_coeff
@[simp]
theorem coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.coeff = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
coeff_injective.eq_iff' rfl
#align hahn_series.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
theorem ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero {x : HahnSeries Γ R} {g : Γ} (h : x.coeff g ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
mt (fun x0 => (x0.symm ▸ zero_coeff : x.coeff g = 0)) h
#align hahn_series.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero HahnSeries.ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : support (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ∅ :=
Function.support_zero
#align hahn_series.support_zero HahnSeries.support_zero
@[simp]
nonrec theorem support_nonempty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support.Nonempty ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
rw [support, support_nonempty_iff, Ne, coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff]
#align hahn_series.support_nonempty_iff HahnSeries.support_nonempty_iff
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x.support = ∅ ↔ x = 0 :=
support_eq_empty_iff.trans coeff_fun_eq_zero_iff
#align hahn_series.support_eq_empty_iff HahnSeries.support_eq_empty_iff
def ofIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R)) :
HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
coeff := fun g => coeff (coeff x g.1) g.2
isPWO_support' := by
refine Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.subsetProdLex ?_ ?_
· refine Set.IsPWO.mono x.isPWO_support' ?_
simp_rw [Set.image_subset_iff, support_subset_iff, Set.mem_preimage, Function.mem_support]
exact fun _ ↦ ne_zero_of_coeff_ne_zero
· exact fun a => by simpa [Function.mem_support, ne_eq] using (x.coeff a).isPWO_support'
@[simp]
lemma mk_eq_zero (f : Γ → R) (h) : HahnSeries.mk f h = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [HahnSeries.ext_iff]
rfl
def toIterate {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] (x : HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R) :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) where
coeff := fun g => {
coeff := fun g' => coeff x (g, g')
isPWO_support' := Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g
}
isPWO_support' := by
have h₁ : (Function.support fun g => HahnSeries.mk (fun g' => x.coeff (g, g'))
(Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.fiberProdLex x.isPWO_support' g)) = Function.support
fun g => fun g' => x.coeff (g, g') := by
simp only [Function.support, ne_eq, mk_eq_zero]
rw [h₁, Function.support_curry' x.coeff]
exact Set.PartiallyWellOrderedOn.imageProdLex x.isPWO_support'
@[simps]
def iterateEquiv {Γ' : Type*} [PartialOrder Γ'] :
HahnSeries Γ (HahnSeries Γ' R) ≃ HahnSeries (Γ ×ₗ Γ') R where
toFun := ofIterate
invFun := toIterate
left_inv := congrFun rfl
right_inv := congrFun rfl
def single (a : Γ) : ZeroHom R (HahnSeries Γ R) where
toFun r :=
{ coeff := Pi.single a r
isPWO_support' := (Set.isPWO_singleton a).mono Pi.support_single_subset }
map_zero' := HahnSeries.ext _ _ (Pi.single_zero _)
#align hahn_series.single HahnSeries.single
variable {a b : Γ} {r : R}
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_same (a : Γ) (r : R) : (single a r).coeff a = r :=
Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ => R) a r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_same HahnSeries.single_coeff_same
@[simp]
theorem single_coeff_of_ne (h : b ≠ a) : (single a r).coeff b = 0 :=
Pi.single_eq_of_ne (f := fun _ => R) h r
#align hahn_series.single_coeff_of_ne HahnSeries.single_coeff_of_ne
theorem single_coeff : (single a r).coeff b = if b = a then r else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
#align hahn_series.single_coeff HahnSeries.single_coeff
@[simp]
theorem support_single_of_ne (h : r ≠ 0) : support (single a r) = {a} :=
Pi.support_single_of_ne h
#align hahn_series.support_single_of_ne HahnSeries.support_single_of_ne
theorem support_single_subset : support (single a r) ⊆ {a} :=
Pi.support_single_subset
#align hahn_series.support_single_subset HahnSeries.support_single_subset
theorem eq_of_mem_support_single {b : Γ} (h : b ∈ support (single a r)) : b = a :=
support_single_subset h
#align hahn_series.eq_of_mem_support_single HahnSeries.eq_of_mem_support_single
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem single_eq_zero : single a (0 : R) = 0 :=
(single a).map_zero
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero HahnSeries.single_eq_zero
theorem single_injective (a : Γ) : Function.Injective (single a : R → HahnSeries Γ R) :=
fun r s rs => by rw [← single_coeff_same a r, ← single_coeff_same a s, rs]
#align hahn_series.single_injective HahnSeries.single_injective
theorem single_ne_zero (h : r ≠ 0) : single a r ≠ 0 := fun con =>
h (single_injective a (con.trans single_eq_zero.symm))
#align hahn_series.single_ne_zero HahnSeries.single_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero_iff {a : Γ} {r : R} : single a r = 0 ↔ r = 0 :=
map_eq_zero_iff _ <| single_injective a
#align hahn_series.single_eq_zero_iff HahnSeries.single_eq_zero_iff
instance [Nonempty Γ] [Nontrivial R] : Nontrivial (HahnSeries Γ R) :=
⟨by
obtain ⟨r, s, rs⟩ := exists_pair_ne R
inhabit Γ
refine ⟨single default r, single default s, fun con => rs ?_⟩
rw [← single_coeff_same (default : Γ) r, con, single_coeff_same]⟩
section Order
def orderTop (x : HahnSeries Γ R) : WithTop Γ :=
if h : x = 0 then ⊤ else x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem orderTop_zero : orderTop (0 : HahnSeries Γ R) = ⊤ :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem orderTop_of_ne {x : HahnSeries Γ R} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
orderTop x = x.isWF_support.min (support_nonempty_iff.2 hx) :=
dif_neg hx
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero_iff_orderTop {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : x ≠ 0 ↔ orderTop x ≠ ⊤ := by
constructor
· exact fun hx => Eq.mpr (congrArg (fun h ↦ h ≠ ⊤) (orderTop_of_ne hx)) WithTop.coe_ne_top
· contrapose!
simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/HahnSeries/Basic.lean | 252 | 256 | theorem orderTop_eq_top_iff {x : HahnSeries Γ R} : orderTop x = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 := by |
constructor
· contrapose!
exact ne_zero_iff_orderTop.mp
· simp_all only [orderTop_zero, implies_true]
|
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Over
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Prod
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.MinimalPrime
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Away.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Closeds
import Mathlib.Topology.Sober
#align_import algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a7c017d750512a352b623b1824d75da5998457d0"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v)
@[ext]
structure PrimeSpectrum [CommSemiring R] where
asIdeal : Ideal R
IsPrime : asIdeal.IsPrime
#align prime_spectrum PrimeSpectrum
attribute [instance] PrimeSpectrum.IsPrime
namespace PrimeSpectrum
section CommSemiRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
variable {R S}
instance [Nontrivial R] : Nonempty <| PrimeSpectrum R :=
let ⟨I, hI⟩ := Ideal.exists_maximal R
⟨⟨I, hI.isPrime⟩⟩
instance [Subsingleton R] : IsEmpty (PrimeSpectrum R) :=
⟨fun x ↦ x.IsPrime.ne_top <| SetLike.ext' <| Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty x.asIdeal.nonempty⟩
#noalign prime_spectrum.punit
variable (R S)
@[simp]
def primeSpectrumProdOfSum : Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) → PrimeSpectrum (R × S)
| Sum.inl ⟨I, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod I ⊤, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top⟩
| Sum.inr ⟨J, _⟩ => ⟨Ideal.prod ⊤ J, Ideal.isPrime_ideal_prod_top'⟩
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod_of_sum PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProdOfSum
noncomputable def primeSpectrumProd :
PrimeSpectrum (R × S) ≃ Sum (PrimeSpectrum R) (PrimeSpectrum S) :=
Equiv.symm <|
Equiv.ofBijective (primeSpectrumProdOfSum R S) (by
constructor
· rintro (⟨I, hI⟩ | ⟨J, hJ⟩) (⟨I', hI'⟩ | ⟨J', hJ'⟩) h <;>
simp only [mk.injEq, Ideal.prod.ext_iff, primeSpectrumProdOfSum] at h
· simp only [h]
· exact False.elim (hI.ne_top h.left)
· exact False.elim (hJ.ne_top h.right)
· simp only [h]
· rintro ⟨I, hI⟩
rcases (Ideal.ideal_prod_prime I).mp hI with (⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩ | ⟨p, ⟨hp, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact ⟨Sum.inl ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨p, hp⟩, rfl⟩)
#align prime_spectrum.prime_spectrum_prod PrimeSpectrum.primeSpectrumProd
variable {R S}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/PrimeSpectrum/Basic.lean | 116 | 119 | theorem primeSpectrumProd_symm_inl_asIdeal (x : PrimeSpectrum R) :
((primeSpectrumProd R S).symm <| Sum.inl x).asIdeal = Ideal.prod x.asIdeal ⊤ := by |
cases x
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Clopen
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
#align_import topology.connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d101e93197bb5f6ea89bd7ba386b7f7dff1f3903"
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
#align is_preconnected IsPreconnected
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
#align is_connected IsConnected
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
#align is_connected.nonempty IsConnected.nonempty
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
#align is_connected.is_preconnected IsConnected.isPreconnected
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
#align is_preirreducible.is_preconnected IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_irreducible.is_connected IsIrreducible.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_empty isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
#align is_connected_singleton isConnected_singleton
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_singleton isPreconnected_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.is_preconnected Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
#align is_preconnected_of_forall isPreconnected_of_forall
theorem isPreconnected_of_forall_pair {s : Set α}
(H : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) :
IsPreconnected s := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩)
exacts [isPreconnected_empty, isPreconnected_of_forall x fun y => H x hx y]
#align is_preconnected_of_forall_pair isPreconnected_of_forall_pair
theorem isPreconnected_sUnion (x : α) (c : Set (Set α)) (H1 : ∀ s ∈ c, x ∈ s)
(H2 : ∀ s ∈ c, IsPreconnected s) : IsPreconnected (⋃₀ c) := by
apply isPreconnected_of_forall x
rintro y ⟨s, sc, ys⟩
exact ⟨s, subset_sUnion_of_mem sc, H1 s sc, ys, H2 s sc⟩
#align is_preconnected_sUnion isPreconnected_sUnion
theorem isPreconnected_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → Set α} (h₁ : (⋂ i, s i).Nonempty)
(h₂ : ∀ i, IsPreconnected (s i)) : IsPreconnected (⋃ i, s i) :=
Exists.elim h₁ fun f hf => isPreconnected_sUnion f _ hf (forall_mem_range.2 h₂)
#align is_preconnected_Union isPreconnected_iUnion
theorem IsPreconnected.union (x : α) {s t : Set α} (H1 : x ∈ s) (H2 : x ∈ t) (H3 : IsPreconnected s)
(H4 : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) :=
sUnion_pair s t ▸ isPreconnected_sUnion x {s, t} (by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
(by rintro r (rfl | rfl | h) <;> assumption)
#align is_preconnected.union IsPreconnected.union
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 142 | 145 | theorem IsPreconnected.union' {s t : Set α} (H : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) (hs : IsPreconnected s)
(ht : IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected (s ∪ t) := by |
rcases H with ⟨x, hxs, hxt⟩
exact hs.union x hxs hxt ht
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateL_size
theorem Sized.rotateR_size {l x r} (hl : Sized l) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateR α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
rw [← size_dual, dual_rotateR, hl.dual.rotateL_size, size_dual, size_dual, add_comm (size l)]
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r_size Ordnode.Sized.rotateR_size
theorem Sized.balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (balance' l x r) := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· exact hl.node' hr
· exact hl.rotateL hr
· exact hl.rotateR hr
· exact hl.node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.balance' Ordnode.Sized.balance'
theorem size_balance' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) :
size (@balance' α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by
unfold balance'; split_ifs
· rfl
· exact hr.rotateL_size
· exact hl.rotateR_size
· rfl
#align ordnode.size_balance' Ordnode.size_balance'
theorem All.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, All P t → All Q t
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ _ _ _, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => ⟨h₁.imp H, H _ h₂, h₃.imp H⟩
#align ordnode.all.imp Ordnode.All.imp
theorem Any.imp {P Q : α → Prop} (H : ∀ a, P a → Q a) : ∀ {t}, Any P t → Any Q t
| nil => id
| node _ _ _ _ => Or.imp (Any.imp H) <| Or.imp (H _) (Any.imp H)
#align ordnode.any.imp Ordnode.Any.imp
theorem all_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : All P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨fun h => h.2.1, fun h => ⟨⟨⟩, h, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_singleton Ordnode.all_singleton
theorem any_singleton {P : α → Prop} {x : α} : Any P (singleton x) ↔ P x :=
⟨by rintro (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | h | ⟨⟨⟩⟩); exact h, fun h => Or.inr (Or.inl h)⟩
#align ordnode.any_singleton Ordnode.any_singleton
theorem all_dual {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, All P (dual t) ↔ All P t
| nil => Iff.rfl
| node _ _l _x _r =>
⟨fun ⟨hr, hx, hl⟩ => ⟨all_dual.1 hl, hx, all_dual.1 hr⟩, fun ⟨hl, hx, hr⟩ =>
⟨all_dual.2 hr, hx, all_dual.2 hl⟩⟩
#align ordnode.all_dual Ordnode.all_dual
theorem all_iff_forall {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, All P t ↔ ∀ x, Emem x t → P x
| nil => (iff_true_intro <| by rintro _ ⟨⟩).symm
| node _ l x r => by simp [All, Emem, all_iff_forall, Any, or_imp, forall_and]
#align ordnode.all_iff_forall Ordnode.all_iff_forall
theorem any_iff_exists {P : α → Prop} : ∀ {t}, Any P t ↔ ∃ x, Emem x t ∧ P x
| nil => ⟨by rintro ⟨⟩, by rintro ⟨_, ⟨⟩, _⟩⟩
| node _ l x r => by simp only [Emem]; simp [Any, any_iff_exists, or_and_right, exists_or]
#align ordnode.any_iff_exists Ordnode.any_iff_exists
theorem emem_iff_all {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ ∀ P, All P t → P x :=
⟨fun h _ al => all_iff_forall.1 al _ h, fun H => H _ <| all_iff_forall.2 fun _ => id⟩
#align ordnode.emem_iff_all Ordnode.emem_iff_all
theorem all_node' {P l x r} : @All α P (node' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node' Ordnode.all_node'
theorem all_node3L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
simp [node3L, all_node', and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node3_l Ordnode.all_node3L
theorem all_node3R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node3R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r :=
Iff.rfl
#align ordnode.all_node3_r Ordnode.all_node3R
theorem all_node4L {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4L l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, all_node', All, all_node3L, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_l Ordnode.all_node4L
theorem all_node4R {P l x m y r} :
@All α P (node4R l x m y r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P m ∧ P y ∧ All P r := by
cases m <;> simp [node4R, all_node', All, all_node3R, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_node4_r Ordnode.all_node4R
theorem all_rotateL {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateL l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, all_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [all_node3L, all_node4L, All, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_l Ordnode.all_rotateL
theorem all_rotateR {P l x r} : @All α P (rotateR l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [← all_dual, dual_rotateR, all_rotateL]; simp [all_dual, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
#align ordnode.all_rotate_r Ordnode.all_rotateR
theorem all_balance' {P l x r} : @All α P (balance' l x r) ↔ All P l ∧ P x ∧ All P r := by
rw [balance']; split_ifs <;> simp [all_node', all_rotateL, all_rotateR]
#align ordnode.all_balance' Ordnode.all_balance'
theorem foldr_cons_eq_toList : ∀ (t : Ordnode α) (r : List α), t.foldr List.cons r = toList t ++ r
| nil, r => rfl
| node _ l x r, r' => by
rw [foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList l, foldr_cons_eq_toList r, ← List.cons_append,
← List.append_assoc, ← foldr_cons_eq_toList l]; rfl
#align ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_to_list Ordnode.foldr_cons_eq_toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_nil : toList (@nil α) = [] :=
rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_nil Ordnode.toList_nil
@[simp]
theorem toList_node (s l x r) : toList (@node α s l x r) = toList l ++ x :: toList r := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons_eq_toList]; rfl
#align ordnode.to_list_node Ordnode.toList_node
theorem emem_iff_mem_toList {x : α} {t} : Emem x t ↔ x ∈ toList t := by
unfold Emem; induction t <;> simp [Any, *, or_assoc]
#align ordnode.emem_iff_mem_to_list Ordnode.emem_iff_mem_toList
theorem length_toList' : ∀ t : Ordnode α, (toList t).length = t.realSize
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ r => by
rw [toList_node, List.length_append, List.length_cons, length_toList' l,
length_toList' r]; rfl
#align ordnode.length_to_list' Ordnode.length_toList'
theorem length_toList {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t) : (toList t).length = t.size := by
rw [length_toList', size_eq_realSize h]
#align ordnode.length_to_list Ordnode.length_toList
theorem equiv_iff {t₁ t₂ : Ordnode α} (h₁ : Sized t₁) (h₂ : Sized t₂) :
Equiv t₁ t₂ ↔ toList t₁ = toList t₂ :=
and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => by rw [← length_toList h₁, h, length_toList h₂]
#align ordnode.equiv_iff Ordnode.equiv_iff
theorem pos_size_of_mem [LE α] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] {x : α} {t : Ordnode α} (h : Sized t)
(h_mem : x ∈ t) : 0 < size t := by cases t; · { contradiction }; · { simp [h.1] }
#align ordnode.pos_size_of_mem Ordnode.pos_size_of_mem
theorem findMin'_dual : ∀ (t) (x : α), findMin' (dual t) x = findMax' x t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node _ _ x r, _ => findMin'_dual r x
#align ordnode.find_min'_dual Ordnode.findMin'_dual
theorem findMax'_dual (t) (x : α) : findMax' x (dual t) = findMin' t x := by
rw [← findMin'_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max'_dual Ordnode.findMax'_dual
theorem findMin_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, findMin (dual t) = findMax t
| nil => rfl
| node _ _ _ _ => congr_arg some <| findMin'_dual _ _
#align ordnode.find_min_dual Ordnode.findMin_dual
theorem findMax_dual (t : Ordnode α) : findMax (dual t) = findMin t := by
rw [← findMin_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.find_max_dual Ordnode.findMax_dual
theorem dual_eraseMin : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (eraseMin t) = eraseMax (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ nil x r => rfl
| node _ (node sz l' y r') x r => by
rw [eraseMin, dual_balanceR, dual_eraseMin (node sz l' y r'), dual, dual, dual, eraseMax]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_min Ordnode.dual_eraseMin
theorem dual_eraseMax (t : Ordnode α) : dual (eraseMax t) = eraseMin (dual t) := by
rw [← dual_dual (eraseMin _), dual_eraseMin, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_erase_max Ordnode.dual_eraseMax
theorem splitMin_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMin' l x r = (findMin' l x, eraseMin (node s l x r))
| _, nil, x, r => rfl
| _, node ls ll lx lr, x, r => by rw [splitMin', splitMin_eq ls ll lx lr, findMin', eraseMin]
#align ordnode.split_min_eq Ordnode.splitMin_eq
theorem splitMax_eq :
∀ (s l) (x : α) (r), splitMax' l x r = (eraseMax (node s l x r), findMax' x r)
| _, l, x, nil => rfl
| _, l, x, node ls ll lx lr => by rw [splitMax', splitMax_eq ls ll lx lr, findMax', eraseMax]
#align ordnode.split_max_eq Ordnode.splitMax_eq
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMin'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (t) (x : α), All P t → P x → P (findMin' t x)
| nil, _x, _, hx => hx
| node _ ll lx _, _, ⟨h₁, h₂, _⟩, _ => findMin'_all ll lx h₁ h₂
#align ordnode.find_min'_all Ordnode.findMin'_all
-- @[elab_as_elim] -- Porting note: unexpected eliminator resulting type
theorem findMax'_all {P : α → Prop} : ∀ (x : α) (t), P x → All P t → P (findMax' x t)
| _x, nil, hx, _ => hx
| _, node _ _ lx lr, _, ⟨_, h₂, h₃⟩ => findMax'_all lx lr h₂ h₃
#align ordnode.find_max'_all Ordnode.findMax'_all
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_left (t : Ordnode α) : merge t nil = t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_left Ordnode.merge_nil_left
@[simp]
theorem merge_nil_right (t : Ordnode α) : merge nil t = t :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_nil_right Ordnode.merge_nil_right
@[simp]
theorem merge_node {ls ll lx lr rs rl rx rr} :
merge (@node α ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) =
if delta * ls < rs then balanceL (merge (node ls ll lx lr) rl) rx rr
else if delta * rs < ls then balanceR ll lx (merge lr (node rs rl rx rr))
else glue (node ls ll lx lr) (node rs rl rx rr) :=
rfl
#align ordnode.merge_node Ordnode.merge_node
theorem dual_insert [Preorder α] [IsTotal α (· ≤ ·)] [@DecidableRel α (· ≤ ·)] (x : α) :
∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (Ordnode.insert x t) = @Ordnode.insert αᵒᵈ _ _ x (dual t)
| nil => rfl
| node _ l y r => by
have : @cmpLE αᵒᵈ _ _ x y = cmpLE y x := rfl
rw [Ordnode.insert, dual, Ordnode.insert, this, ← cmpLE_swap x y]
cases cmpLE x y <;>
simp [Ordering.swap, Ordnode.insert, dual_balanceL, dual_balanceR, dual_insert]
#align ordnode.dual_insert Ordnode.dual_insert
theorem balance_eq_balance' {l x r} (hl : Balanced l) (hr : Balanced r) (sl : Sized l)
(sr : Sized r) : @balance α l x r = balance' l x r := by
cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· rw [sr.eq_node'] at hr ⊢
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr <;> cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size rrl = 0 ∧ size rrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm
rwa [size, sr.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rrs = 1 := sr.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size rll = 0 ∧ size rlr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1
rwa [size, sr.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : rls = 1 := sr.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_pos, rotateL_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [zero_add, if_neg, if_pos, rotateL]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node']; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.2.1.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sr.2.1.pos sr.2.2.pos))
· cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rw [sl.eq_node'] at hl ⊢
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;>
dsimp [balance, balance']
· rfl
· have : size lrl = 0 ∧ size lrr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm
rwa [size, sl.2.2.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.2.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.2.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lrs = 1 := sl.2.2.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_neg]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· have : size lll = 0 ∧ size llr = 0 := by
have := balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1
rwa [size, sl.2.1.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sl.2.1.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sl.2.1.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
obtain rfl : lls = 1 := sl.2.1.1
rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR_node, if_pos]; · rfl
all_goals dsimp only [size]; decide
· symm; rw [if_neg, if_neg, if_pos, rotateR]
· dsimp only [size_node]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node']; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.2.2.1]; abel
· apply Nat.zero_lt_succ
· apply Nat.not_lt_zero
· exact not_le_of_gt (Nat.succ_lt_succ (add_pos sl.2.1.pos sl.2.2.pos))
· simp [balance, balance']
symm; rw [if_neg]
· split_ifs with h h_1
· have rd : delta ≤ size rl + size rr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sl.pos) h
rwa [sr.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' rl with rls rll rlx rlr
· rw [size, zero_add] at rd
exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' rr with rrs rrl rrx rrr
· exact absurd (le_trans rd (balancedSz_zero.1 hr.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateL]; split_ifs
· simp [node3L, node', sr.1]; abel
· simp [node4L, node', sr.1, sr.2.1.1]; abel
· have ld : delta ≤ size ll + size lr := by
have := lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ sr.pos) h_1
rwa [sl.1, Nat.lt_succ_iff] at this
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr
· rw [size, zero_add] at ld
exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1.symm)) (by decide)
cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr
· exact absurd (le_trans ld (balancedSz_zero.1 hl.1)) (by decide)
dsimp [rotateR]; split_ifs
· simp [node3R, node', sl.1]; abel
· simp [node4R, node', sl.1, sl.2.2.1]; abel
· simp [node']
· exact not_le_of_gt (add_le_add (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sl.pos) (Nat.succ_le_of_lt sr.pos))
#align ordnode.balance_eq_balance' Ordnode.balance_eq_balance'
theorem balanceL_eq_balance {l x r} (sl : Sized l) (sr : Sized r) (H1 : size l = 0 → size r ≤ 1)
(H2 : 1 ≤ size l → 1 ≤ size r → size r ≤ delta * size l) :
@balanceL α l x r = balance l x r := by
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· rfl
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr
· have : size rl = 0 ∧ size rr = 0 := by
have := H1 rfl
rwa [size, sr.1, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff, Nat.le_zero, add_eq_zero_iff] at this
cases sr.2.1.size_eq_zero.1 this.1
cases sr.2.2.size_eq_zero.1 this.2
rw [sr.eq_node']; rfl
· replace H2 : ¬rs > delta * ls := not_lt_of_le (H2 sl.pos sr.pos)
simp [balanceL, balance, H2]; split_ifs <;> simp [add_comm]
#align ordnode.balance_l_eq_balance Ordnode.balanceL_eq_balance
def Raised (n m : ℕ) : Prop :=
m = n ∨ m = n + 1
#align ordnode.raised Ordnode.Raised
theorem raised_iff {n m} : Raised n m ↔ n ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n + 1 := by
constructor
· rintro (rfl | rfl)
· exact ⟨le_rfl, Nat.le_succ _⟩
· exact ⟨Nat.le_succ _, le_rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr (le_antisymm h₂ h₁)
#align ordnode.raised_iff Ordnode.raised_iff
theorem Raised.dist_le {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist n m ≤ 1 := by
cases' raised_iff.1 H with H1 H2; rwa [Nat.dist_eq_sub_of_le H1, tsub_le_iff_left]
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le Ordnode.Raised.dist_le
theorem Raised.dist_le' {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Nat.dist m n ≤ 1 := by
rw [Nat.dist_comm]; exact H.dist_le
#align ordnode.raised.dist_le' Ordnode.Raised.dist_le'
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 802 | 805 | theorem Raised.add_left (k) {n m} (H : Raised n m) : Raised (k + n) (k + m) := by |
rcases H with (rfl | rfl)
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr rfl
|
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Separable
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralDomain
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Reduced
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
#align_import field_theory.finite.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"12a85fac627bea918960da036049d611b1a3ee43"
variable {K : Type*} {R : Type*}
local notation "q" => Fintype.card K
open Finset
open scoped Polynomial
namespace FiniteField
theorem prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one [CommRing K] [IsDomain K] [Fintype Kˣ] :
∏ x : Kˣ, x = (-1 : Kˣ) := by
classical
have : (∏ x ∈ (@univ Kˣ _).erase (-1), x) = 1 :=
prod_involution (fun x _ => x⁻¹) (by simp)
(fun a => by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [Units.inv_eq_self_iff])
(fun a => by simp [@inv_eq_iff_eq_inv _ _ a]) (by simp)
rw [← insert_erase (mem_univ (-1 : Kˣ)), prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), this, mul_one]
#align finite_field.prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one FiniteField.prod_univ_units_id_eq_neg_one
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem card_cast_subgroup_card_ne_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K] [Nontrivial K]
(G : Subgroup Kˣ) [Fintype G] : (Fintype.card G : K) ≠ 0 := by
let n := Fintype.card G
intro nzero
have ⟨p, char_p⟩ := CharP.exists K
have hd : p ∣ n := (CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff K p n).mp nzero
cases CharP.char_is_prime_or_zero K p with
| inr pzero =>
exact (Fintype.card_pos).ne' <| Nat.eq_zero_of_zero_dvd <| pzero ▸ hd
| inl pprime =>
have fact_pprime := Fact.mk pprime
-- G has an element x of order p by Cauchy's theorem
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card p hd
-- F has an element u (= ↑↑x) of order p
let u := ((x : Kˣ) : K)
have hu : orderOf u = p := by rwa [orderOf_units, Subgroup.orderOf_coe]
-- u ^ p = 1 implies (u - 1) ^ p = 0 and hence u = 1 ...
have h : u = 1 := by
rw [← sub_left_inj, sub_self 1]
apply pow_eq_zero (n := p)
rw [sub_pow_char_of_commute, one_pow, ← hu, pow_orderOf_eq_one, sub_self]
exact Commute.one_right u
-- ... meaning x didn't have order p after all, contradiction
apply pprime.one_lt.ne
rw [← hu, h, orderOf_one]
theorem sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] (hg : G ≠ ⊥) :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = 0 := by
rw [Subgroup.ne_bot_iff_exists_ne_one] at hg
rcases hg with ⟨a, ha⟩
-- The action of a on G as an embedding
let a_mul_emb : G ↪ G := mulLeftEmbedding a
-- ... and leaves G unchanged
have h_unchanged : Finset.univ.map a_mul_emb = Finset.univ := by simp
-- Therefore the sum of x over a G is the sum of a x over G
have h_sum_map := Finset.univ.sum_map a_mul_emb fun x => ((x : Kˣ) : K)
-- ... and the former is the sum of x over G.
-- By algebraic manipulation, we have Σ G, x = ∑ G, a x = a ∑ G, x
simp only [a_mul_emb, h_unchanged, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, Function.Embedding.toFun_eq_coe,
mulLeftEmbedding_apply, Submonoid.coe_mul, Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid, Units.val_mul,
← Finset.mul_sum] at h_sum_map
-- thus one of (a - 1) or ∑ G, x is zero
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) - 1) = 0 ∨ ∑ x : ↥G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) = 0 := by
rw [← mul_eq_zero, sub_mul, ← h_sum_map, one_mul, sub_self]
apply Or.resolve_left hzero
contrapose! ha
ext
rwa [← sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_units [Ring K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] [Decidable (G = ⊥)] :
∑ x : G, (x.val : K) = if G = ⊥ then 1 else 0 := by
by_cases G_bot : G = ⊥
· subst G_bot
simp only [ite_true, Subgroup.mem_bot, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_ite, Nat.cast_one,
Nat.cast_zero, univ_unique, Set.default_coe_singleton, sum_singleton, Units.val_one]
· simp only [G_bot, ite_false]
exact sum_subgroup_units_eq_zero G_bot
@[simp]
theorem sum_subgroup_pow_eq_zero [CommRing K] [NoZeroDivisors K]
{G : Subgroup Kˣ} [Fintype G] {k : ℕ} (k_pos : k ≠ 0) (k_lt_card_G : k < Fintype.card G) :
∑ x : G, ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k = 0 := by
nontriviality K
have := NoZeroDivisors.to_isDomain K
rcases (exists_pow_ne_one_of_isCyclic k_pos k_lt_card_G) with ⟨a, ha⟩
rw [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum]
have h_multiset_map :
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) =
Finset.univ.val.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) := by
simp_rw [← mul_pow]
have as_comp :
(fun x : ↥G => (((x : Kˣ) : K) * ((a : Kˣ) : K)) ^ k)
= (fun x : ↥G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) ∘ fun x : ↥G => x * a := by
funext x
simp only [Function.comp_apply, Submonoid.coe_mul, Subgroup.coe_toSubmonoid, Units.val_mul]
rw [as_comp, ← Multiset.map_map]
congr
rw [eq_comm]
exact Multiset.map_univ_val_equiv (Equiv.mulRight a)
have h_multiset_map_sum : (Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum =
(Multiset.map (fun x : G => ((x : Kˣ) : K) ^ k * ((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum := by
rw [h_multiset_map]
rw [Multiset.sum_map_mul_right] at h_multiset_map_sum
have hzero : (((a : Kˣ) : K) ^ k - 1 : K)
* (Multiset.map (fun i : G => (i.val : K) ^ k) Finset.univ.val).sum = 0 := by
rw [sub_mul, mul_comm, ← h_multiset_map_sum, one_mul, sub_self]
rw [mul_eq_zero] at hzero
refine hzero.resolve_left fun h => ha ?_
ext
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
simp_rw [SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, OneMemClass.coe_one, Units.val_one, h]
section
variable [GroupWithZero K] [Fintype K]
theorem pow_card_sub_one_eq_one (a : K) (ha : a ≠ 0) : a ^ (q - 1) = 1 := by
calc
a ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) = (Units.mk0 a ha ^ (Fintype.card K - 1) : Kˣ).1 := by
rw [Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, Units.val_mk0]
_ = 1 := by
classical
rw [← Fintype.card_units, pow_card_eq_one]
rfl
#align finite_field.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one FiniteField.pow_card_sub_one_eq_one
theorem pow_card (a : K) : a ^ q = a := by
by_cases h : a = 0; · rw [h]; apply zero_pow Fintype.card_ne_zero
rw [← Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos Fintype.card_pos, pow_succ, Nat.pred_eq_sub_one,
pow_card_sub_one_eq_one a h, one_mul]
#align finite_field.pow_card FiniteField.pow_card
theorem pow_card_pow (n : ℕ) (a : K) : a ^ q ^ n = a := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [pow_succ, pow_mul, ih, pow_card]
#align finite_field.pow_card_pow FiniteField.pow_card_pow
end
variable (K) [Field K] [Fintype K]
theorem card (p : ℕ) [CharP K p] : ∃ n : ℕ+, Nat.Prime p ∧ q = p ^ (n : ℕ) := by
haveI hp : Fact p.Prime := ⟨CharP.char_is_prime K p⟩
letI : Module (ZMod p) K := { (ZMod.castHom dvd_rfl K : ZMod p →+* _).toModule with }
obtain ⟨n, h⟩ := VectorSpace.card_fintype (ZMod p) K
rw [ZMod.card] at h
refine ⟨⟨n, ?_⟩, hp.1, h⟩
apply Or.resolve_left (Nat.eq_zero_or_pos n)
rintro rfl
rw [pow_zero] at h
have : (0 : K) = 1 := by apply Fintype.card_le_one_iff.mp (le_of_eq h)
exact absurd this zero_ne_one
#align finite_field.card FiniteField.card
-- this statement doesn't use `q` because we want `K` to be an explicit parameter
theorem card' : ∃ (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ+), Nat.Prime p ∧ Fintype.card K = p ^ (n : ℕ) :=
let ⟨p, hc⟩ := CharP.exists K
⟨p, @FiniteField.card K _ _ p hc⟩
#align finite_field.card' FiniteField.card'
-- Porting note: this was a `simp` lemma with a 5 lines proof.
theorem cast_card_eq_zero : (q : K) = 0 := by
simp
#align finite_field.cast_card_eq_zero FiniteField.cast_card_eq_zero
theorem forall_pow_eq_one_iff (i : ℕ) : (∀ x : Kˣ, x ^ i = 1) ↔ q - 1 ∣ i := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := IsCyclic.exists_generator (α := Kˣ)
rw [← Fintype.card_units, ← orderOf_eq_card_of_forall_mem_zpowers hx,
orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one]
constructor
· intro h; apply h
· intro h y
simp_rw [← mem_powers_iff_mem_zpowers] at hx
rcases hx y with ⟨j, rfl⟩
rw [← pow_mul, mul_comm, pow_mul, h, one_pow]
#align finite_field.forall_pow_eq_one_iff FiniteField.forall_pow_eq_one_iff
theorem sum_pow_units [DecidableEq K] (i : ℕ) :
(∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K)) = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
let φ : Kˣ →* K :=
{ toFun := fun x => x ^ i
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' := by intros; simp [mul_pow] }
have : Decidable (φ = 1) := by classical infer_instance
calc (∑ x : Kˣ, φ x) = if φ = 1 then Fintype.card Kˣ else 0 := sum_hom_units φ
_ = if q - 1 ∣ i then -1 else 0 := by
suffices q - 1 ∣ i ↔ φ = 1 by
simp only [this]
split_ifs; swap
· exact Nat.cast_zero
· rw [Fintype.card_units, Nat.cast_sub,
cast_card_eq_zero, Nat.cast_one, zero_sub]
show 1 ≤ q; exact Fintype.card_pos_iff.mpr ⟨0⟩
rw [← forall_pow_eq_one_iff, DFunLike.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'; intro x; simp [φ, Units.ext_iff]
#align finite_field.sum_pow_units FiniteField.sum_pow_units
theorem sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one (i : ℕ) (h : i < q - 1) : ∑ x : K, x ^ i = 0 := by
by_cases hi : i = 0
· simp only [hi, nsmul_one, sum_const, pow_zero, card_univ, cast_card_eq_zero]
classical
have hiq : ¬q - 1 ∣ i := by contrapose! h; exact Nat.le_of_dvd (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi) h
let φ : Kˣ ↪ K := ⟨fun x ↦ x, Units.ext⟩
have : univ.map φ = univ \ {0} := by
ext x
simpa only [mem_map, mem_univ, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, true_and_iff, mem_sdiff,
mem_singleton, φ] using isUnit_iff_ne_zero
calc
∑ x : K, x ^ i = ∑ x ∈ univ \ {(0 : K)}, x ^ i := by
rw [← sum_sdiff ({0} : Finset K).subset_univ, sum_singleton, zero_pow hi, add_zero]
_ = ∑ x : Kˣ, (x ^ i : K) := by simp [φ, ← this, univ.sum_map φ]
_ = 0 := by rw [sum_pow_units K i, if_neg]; exact hiq
#align finite_field.sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one FiniteField.sum_pow_lt_card_sub_one
open Polynomial
section
variable (K' : Type*) [Field K'] {p n : ℕ}
theorem X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p := by
have h1 : (X : K'[X]).degree < (X ^ p : K'[X]).degree := by
rw [degree_X_pow, degree_X]
exact mod_cast hp
rw [natDegree_eq_of_degree_eq (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt h1), natDegree_X_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align finite_field.X_pow_card_sub_X_nat_degree_eq FiniteField.X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq
theorem X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_natDegree_eq (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : 1 < p) :
(X ^ p ^ n - X : K'[X]).natDegree = p ^ n :=
X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq K' <| Nat.one_lt_pow hn hp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align finite_field.X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_nat_degree_eq FiniteField.X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_natDegree_eq
theorem X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p - X : K'[X]) ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <|
calc
1 < _ := hp
_ = _ := (X_pow_card_sub_X_natDegree_eq K' hp).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align finite_field.X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero FiniteField.X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero
theorem X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : 1 < p) : (X ^ p ^ n - X : K'[X]) ≠ 0 :=
X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero K' <| Nat.one_lt_pow hn hp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align finite_field.X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_ne_zero FiniteField.X_pow_card_pow_sub_X_ne_zero
end
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] [Algebra (ZMod p) K]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Finite/Basic.lean | 357 | 370 | theorem roots_X_pow_card_sub_X : roots (X ^ q - X : K[X]) = Finset.univ.val := by |
classical
have aux : (X ^ q - X : K[X]) ≠ 0 := X_pow_card_sub_X_ne_zero K Fintype.one_lt_card
have : (roots (X ^ q - X : K[X])).toFinset = Finset.univ := by
rw [eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x
rw [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots aux, IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_pow, eval_X,
sub_eq_zero, pow_card]
rw [← this, Multiset.toFinset_val, eq_comm, Multiset.dedup_eq_self]
apply nodup_roots
rw [separable_def]
convert isCoprime_one_right.neg_right (R := K[X]) using 1
rw [derivative_sub, derivative_X, derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_card_eq_zero K, C_0,
zero_mul, zero_sub]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Functor
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.preadditive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"986c4d5761f938b2e1c43c01f001b6d9d88c2055"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
open CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [Preadditive C] [MonoidalCategory C]
class MonoidalPreadditive : Prop where
whiskerLeft_zero : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, X ◁ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = 0 := by aesop_cat
zero_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C}, (0 : Y ⟶ Z) ▷ X = 0 := by aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_add : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), X ◁ (f + g) = X ◁ f + X ◁ g := by aesop_cat
add_whiskerRight : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f g : Y ⟶ Z), (f + g) ▷ X = f ▷ X + g ▷ X := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive CategoryTheory.MonoidalPreadditive
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_zero MonoidalPreadditive.zero_whiskerRight
attribute [simp] MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight
variable {C}
variable [MonoidalPreadditive C]
instance tensorLeft_additive (X : C) : (tensorLeft X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensorLeft_additive
instance tensorRight_additive (X : C) : (tensorRight X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensor_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensorRight_additive
instance tensoringLeft_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringLeft C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_left_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringLeft_additive
instance tensoringRight_additive (X : C) : ((tensoringRight C).obj X).Additive where
#align category_theory.tensoring_right_additive CategoryTheory.tensoringRight_additive
theorem monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful {D} [Category D] [Preadditive D] [MonoidalCategory D]
(F : MonoidalFunctor D C) [F.Faithful] [F.Additive] :
MonoidalPreadditive D :=
{ whiskerLeft_zero := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerLeft]
zero_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp [F.map_whiskerRight]
whiskerLeft_add := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerLeft, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.whiskerLeft_add]
add_whiskerRight := by
intros
apply F.toFunctor.map_injective
simp only [F.map_whiskerRight, Functor.map_add, Preadditive.comp_add, Preadditive.add_comp,
MonoidalPreadditive.add_whiskerRight] }
#align category_theory.monoidal_preadditive_of_faithful CategoryTheory.monoidalPreadditive_of_faithful
theorem whiskerLeft_sum (P : C) {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) :
P ◁ ∑ j ∈ s, g j = ∑ j ∈ s, P ◁ g j :=
map_sum ((tensoringLeft C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem sum_whiskerRight {Q R : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (g : J → (Q ⟶ R)) (P : C) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ▷ P = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ▷ P :=
map_sum ((tensoringRight C).obj P).mapAddHom g s
theorem tensor_sum {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(f ⊗ ∑ j ∈ s, g j) = ∑ j ∈ s, f ⊗ g j := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, whiskerLeft_sum, Preadditive.comp_sum]
#align category_theory.tensor_sum CategoryTheory.tensor_sum
theorem sum_tensor {P Q R S : C} {J : Type*} (s : Finset J) (f : P ⟶ Q) (g : J → (R ⟶ S)) :
(∑ j ∈ s, g j) ⊗ f = ∑ j ∈ s, g j ⊗ f := by
simp only [tensorHom_def, sum_whiskerRight, Preadditive.sum_comp]
#align category_theory.sum_tensor CategoryTheory.sum_tensor
-- In a closed monoidal category, this would hold because
-- `tensorLeft X` is a left adjoint and hence preserves all colimits.
-- In any case it is true in any preadditive category.
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorLeft X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← tensor_sum, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
instance (X : C) : PreservesFiniteBiproducts (tensorRight X) where
preserves {J} :=
{ preserves := fun {f} =>
{ preserves := fun {b} i => isBilimitOfTotal _ (by
dsimp
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← tensor_comp, Category.comp_id, ← sum_tensor, ← tensor_id,
IsBilimit.total i]) } }
variable [HasFiniteBiproducts C]
def leftDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) : X ⊗ ⨁ f ≅ ⨁ fun j => X ⊗ f j :=
(tensorLeft X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.left_distributor CategoryTheory.leftDistributor
theorem leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom =
∑ j : J, (X ◁ biproduct.π f j) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_hom
theorem leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) := by
ext
dsimp [leftDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [Preadditive.comp_sum, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp, zero_comp,
Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ite_true, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp,
biproduct.ι_desc]
#align category_theory.left_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = X ◁ biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j) ≫ (leftDistributor X f).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => X ⊗ f j) j := by
simp [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp_assoc,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem leftDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
(leftDistributor X f).inv ≫ (X ◁ biproduct.π _ j) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_comp,
biproduct.ι_π, whiskerLeft_dite, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_leftDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X : C) (f : J → C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (leftDistributor X f).inv = X ◁ biproduct.ι _ j := by
simp [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp]
theorem leftDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (X Y : C) (f : J → C) :
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ leftDistributor Y f) ≪≫ leftDistributor X _ =
(α_ X Y (⨁ f)).symm ≪≫ leftDistributor (X ⊗ Y) f ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => α_ X Y _ := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.trans_hom, Iso.symm_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, tensor_sum,
id_tensor_comp, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero]
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π]
simp only [id_tensor_comp, tensor_dite, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_assoc
def rightDistributor {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) : (⨁ f) ⊗ X ≅ ⨁ fun j => f j ⊗ X :=
(tensorRight X).mapBiproduct f
#align category_theory.right_distributor CategoryTheory.rightDistributor
theorem rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom =
∑ j : J, (biproduct.π f j ▷ X) ≫ biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
erw [biproduct.lift_π]
simp only [Preadditive.sum_comp, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite, comp_zero,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_hom CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_hom
theorem rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv = ∑ j : J, biproduct.π _ j ≫ (biproduct.ι f j ▷ X) := by
ext
dsimp [rightDistributor, Functor.mapBiproduct, Functor.mapBicone]
simp only [biproduct.ι_desc, Preadditive.comp_sum, ne_eq, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp, ite_true]
#align category_theory.right_distributor_inv CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_hom_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).hom ≫ biproduct.π _ j = biproduct.π _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_hom {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X) ≫ (rightDistributor f X).hom = biproduct.ι (fun j => f j ⊗ X) j := by
simp [rightDistributor_hom, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← comp_whiskerRight_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
dite_whiskerRight, dite_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem rightDistributor_inv_comp_biproduct_π {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
(rightDistributor f X).inv ≫ (biproduct.π _ j ▷ X) = biproduct.π _ j := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.sum_comp, ← MonoidalCategory.comp_whiskerRight,
biproduct.ι_π, dite_whiskerRight, comp_dite]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem biproduct_ι_comp_rightDistributor_inv {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X : C) (j : J) :
biproduct.ι _ j ≫ (rightDistributor f X).inv = biproduct.ι _ j ▷ X := by
simp [rightDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum, ← id_tensor_comp, biproduct.ι_π_assoc,
dite_comp]
theorem rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type} [Fintype J] (f : J → C) (X Y : C) :
(rightDistributor f X ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ (⨁ f) X Y ≪≫ rightDistributor f (X ⊗ Y) ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ X Y).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, rightDistributor_hom, biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map,
biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, biproduct.ι_π, dite_tensor, comp_dite]
simp
#align category_theory.right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.rightDistributor_assoc
theorem leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc {J : Type _} [Fintype J]
(X : C) (f : J → C) (Y : C) :
(leftDistributor X f ⊗ asIso (𝟙 Y)) ≪≫ rightDistributor _ Y =
α_ X (⨁ f) Y ≪≫
(asIso (𝟙 X) ⊗ rightDistributor _ Y) ≪≫
leftDistributor X _ ≪≫ biproduct.mapIso fun j => (α_ _ _ _).symm := by
ext
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.assoc, eqToHom_refl, Iso.symm_hom, Iso.trans_hom,
asIso_hom, comp_zero, comp_dite, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum, sum_tensor,
tensor_sum, comp_tensor_id, tensorIso_hom, leftDistributor_hom, rightDistributor_hom,
biproduct.mapIso_hom, biproduct.ι_map, biproduct.ι_π, Finset.sum_dite_irrel,
Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.sum_const_zero, Finset.mem_univ, if_true]
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom]
simp only [← comp_tensor_id, ← id_tensor_comp_assoc, Category.assoc, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
dite_comp, tensor_dite, dite_tensor]
simp
#align category_theory.left_distributor_right_distributor_assoc CategoryTheory.leftDistributor_rightDistributor_assoc
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_left {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ ⨁ f ⟶ Y}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ g = (X ◁ biproduct.ι f j) ≫ h) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_epi (leftDistributor X f).inv).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp] says
simp only [leftDistributor_inv, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π_assoc, dite_comp,
zero_comp, Finset.sum_dite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
apply w
@[ext]
theorem leftDistributor_ext_right {J : Type} [Fintype J] {X Y : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⟶ Y ⊗ ⨁ f}
(w : ∀ j, g ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j) = h ≫ (Y ◁ biproduct.π f j)) : g = h := by
apply (cancel_mono (leftDistributor Y f).hom).mp
ext
simp? [leftDistributor_hom, Preadditive.sum_comp, Preadditive.comp_sum_assoc, biproduct.ι_π,
comp_dite] says
simp only [leftDistributor_hom, Category.assoc, Preadditive.sum_comp, biproduct.ι_π, comp_dite,
comp_zero, Finset.sum_dite_eq', Finset.mem_univ, ↓reduceIte, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
apply w
-- One might wonder how many iterated tensor products we need simp lemmas for.
-- The answer is two: this lemma is needed to verify the pentagon identity.
@[ext]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Preadditive.lean | 309 | 315 | theorem leftDistributor_ext₂_left {J : Type} [Fintype J]
{X Y Z : C} {f : J → C} {g h : X ⊗ (Y ⊗ ⨁ f) ⟶ Z}
(w : ∀ j, (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ g = (X ◁ (Y ◁ biproduct.ι f j)) ≫ h) :
g = h := by |
apply (cancel_epi (α_ _ _ _).hom).mp
ext
simp [w]
|
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.right_angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open FiniteDimensional
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
#align orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
#align orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 238 | 242 | theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by |
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import data.polynomial.derivative from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
dsimp only
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
#align polynomial.derivative Polynomial.derivative
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.derivative_apply Polynomial.derivative_apply
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align polynomial.coeff_derivative Polynomial.coeff_derivative
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
#align polynomial.derivative_zero Polynomial.derivative_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.derivative_monomial Polynomial.derivative_monomial
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_X_pow
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by simp [derivative_apply]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C Polynomial.derivative_C
theorem derivative_of_natDegree_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree = 0) : derivative p = 0 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hp, derivative_C]
#align polynomial.derivative_of_nat_degree_zero Polynomial.derivative_of_natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X : derivative (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
(derivative_monomial _ _).trans <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X Polynomial.derivative_X
@[simp]
theorem derivative_one : derivative (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_one Polynomial.derivative_one
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit0
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit1
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_add {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f + g) = derivative f + derivative g :=
derivative.map_add f g
#align polynomial.derivative_add Polynomial.derivative_add
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_add_C (c : R) : derivative (X + C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_add_C Polynomial.derivative_X_add_C
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_sum {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative (f b) :=
map_sum ..
#align polynomial.derivative_sum Polynomial.derivative_sum
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S)
(p : R[X]) : derivative (s • p) = s • derivative p :=
derivative.map_smul_of_tower s p
#align polynomial.derivative_smul Polynomial.derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R]
(s : S) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) : derivative^[k] (s • p) = s • derivative^[k] p := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp [ih]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (C a * p) = C a * derivative^[k] p := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_C_mul, iterate_derivative_smul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul
theorem of_mem_support_derivative {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ p.derivative.support) :
n + 1 ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.2 fun h1 : p.coeff (n + 1) = 0 =>
mem_support_iff.1 h <| show p.derivative.coeff n = 0 by rw [coeff_derivative, h1, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative Polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative
theorem degree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.derivative.degree < p.degree :=
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 <| mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp).2 fun n hp =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.lt_succ_self) <|
Finset.le_sup <| of_mem_support_derivative hp
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_lt Polynomial.degree_derivative_lt
theorem degree_derivative_le {p : R[X]} : p.derivative.degree ≤ p.degree :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p = 0 then le_of_eq <| by rw [H, derivative_zero] else (degree_derivative_lt H).le
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_le Polynomial.degree_derivative_le
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 198 | 204 | theorem natDegree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
p.derivative.natDegree < p.natDegree := by |
rcases eq_or_ne (derivative p) 0 with hp' | hp'
· rw [hp', Polynomial.natDegree_zero]
exact hp.bot_lt
· rw [natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hp']
exact degree_derivative_lt fun h => hp (h.symm ▸ natDegree_zero)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Pi
#align_import algebra.star.self_adjoint from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a6ece35404f60597c651689c1b46ead86de5ac1b"
open Function
variable {R A : Type*}
def IsSelfAdjoint [Star R] (x : R) : Prop :=
star x = x
#align is_self_adjoint IsSelfAdjoint
@[mk_iff]
class IsStarNormal [Mul R] [Star R] (x : R) : Prop where
star_comm_self : Commute (star x) x
#align is_star_normal IsStarNormal
export IsStarNormal (star_comm_self)
theorem star_comm_self' [Mul R] [Star R] (x : R) [IsStarNormal x] : star x * x = x * star x :=
IsStarNormal.star_comm_self
#align star_comm_self' star_comm_self'
namespace IsSelfAdjoint
-- named to match `Commute.allₓ`
theorem all [Star R] [TrivialStar R] (r : R) : IsSelfAdjoint r :=
star_trivial _
#align is_self_adjoint.all IsSelfAdjoint.all
theorem star_eq [Star R] {x : R} (hx : IsSelfAdjoint x) : star x = x :=
hx
#align is_self_adjoint.star_eq IsSelfAdjoint.star_eq
theorem _root_.isSelfAdjoint_iff [Star R] {x : R} : IsSelfAdjoint x ↔ star x = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_self_adjoint_iff isSelfAdjoint_iff
@[simp]
theorem star_iff [InvolutiveStar R] {x : R} : IsSelfAdjoint (star x) ↔ IsSelfAdjoint x := by
simpa only [IsSelfAdjoint, star_star] using eq_comm
#align is_self_adjoint.star_iff IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
@[simp]
theorem star_mul_self [Mul R] [StarMul R] (x : R) : IsSelfAdjoint (star x * x) := by
simp only [IsSelfAdjoint, star_mul, star_star]
#align is_self_adjoint.star_mul_self IsSelfAdjoint.star_mul_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_star_self [Mul R] [StarMul R] (x : R) : IsSelfAdjoint (x * star x) := by
simpa only [star_star] using star_mul_self (star x)
#align is_self_adjoint.mul_star_self IsSelfAdjoint.mul_star_self
lemma commute_iff {R : Type*} [Mul R] [StarMul R] {x y : R}
(hx : IsSelfAdjoint x) (hy : IsSelfAdjoint y) : Commute x y ↔ IsSelfAdjoint (x * y) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [isSelfAdjoint_iff, star_mul, hx.star_eq, hy.star_eq, h.eq]
· simpa only [star_mul, hx.star_eq, hy.star_eq] using h.symm
theorem starHom_apply {F R S : Type*} [Star R] [Star S] [FunLike F R S] [StarHomClass F R S]
{x : R} (hx : IsSelfAdjoint x) (f : F) : IsSelfAdjoint (f x) :=
show star (f x) = f x from map_star f x ▸ congr_arg f hx
#align is_self_adjoint.star_hom_apply IsSelfAdjoint.starHom_apply
theorem _root_.isSelfAdjoint_starHom_apply {F R S : Type*} [Star R] [Star S] [FunLike F R S]
[StarHomClass F R S] [TrivialStar R] (f : F) (x : R) : IsSelfAdjoint (f x) :=
(IsSelfAdjoint.all x).starHom_apply f
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup R] [StarMul R]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Star/SelfAdjoint.lean | 165 | 166 | theorem conjugate {x : R} (hx : IsSelfAdjoint x) (z : R) : IsSelfAdjoint (z * x * star z) := by |
simp only [isSelfAdjoint_iff, star_mul, star_star, mul_assoc, hx.star_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
#align_import data.list.fin_range from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
universe u
namespace List
variable {α : Type u}
@[simp]
theorem map_coe_finRange (n : ℕ) : ((finRange n) : List (Fin n)).map (Fin.val) = List.range n := by
simp_rw [finRange, map_pmap, pmap_eq_map]
exact List.map_id _
#align list.map_coe_fin_range List.map_coe_finRange
| Mathlib/Data/List/FinRange.lean | 30 | 34 | theorem finRange_succ_eq_map (n : ℕ) : finRange n.succ = 0 :: (finRange n).map Fin.succ := by |
apply map_injective_iff.mpr Fin.val_injective
rw [map_cons, map_coe_finRange, range_succ_eq_map, Fin.val_zero, ← map_coe_finRange, map_map,
map_map]
simp only [Function.comp, Fin.val_succ]
|
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteBooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
#align_import data.set.lattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b86832321b586c6ac23ef8cdef6a7a27e42b13bd"
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
#align set.mem_Union₂ Set.mem_iUnion₂
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
#align set.mem_Inter₂ Set.mem_iInter₂
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion_of_mem
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
#align set.mem_Union₂_of_mem Set.mem_iUnion₂_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter_of_mem Set.mem_iInter_of_mem
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
#align set.mem_Inter₂_of_mem Set.mem_iInter₂_of_mem
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ instBooleanAlgebraSet with
le_sSup := fun s t t_in a a_in => ⟨t, t_in, a_in⟩
sSup_le := fun s t h a ⟨t', ⟨t'_in, a_in⟩⟩ => h t' t'_in a_in
le_sInf := fun s t h a a_in t' t'_in => h t' t'_in a_in
sInf_le := fun s t t_in a h => h _ t_in
iInf_iSup_eq := by intros; ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
instance : OrderTop (Set α) where
top := univ
le_top := by simp
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Union_congr_Prop Set.iUnion_congr_Prop
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
#align set.Inter_congr_Prop Set.iInter_congr_Prop
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
#align set.Union_plift_up Set.iUnion_plift_up
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
#align set.Union_plift_down Set.iUnion_plift_down
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
#align set.Inter_plift_up Set.iInter_plift_up
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
#align set.Inter_plift_down Set.iInter_plift_down
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
#align set.Union_eq_if Set.iUnion_eq_if
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
#align set.Union_eq_dif Set.iUnion_eq_dif
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
#align set.Inter_eq_if Set.iInter_eq_if
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
#align set.Infi_eq_dif Set.iInf_eq_dif
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
#align set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
#align set.set_of_exists Set.setOf_exists
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
#align set.set_of_forall Set.setOf_forall
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
#align set.Union_subset Set.iUnion_subset
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
#align set.Union₂_subset Set.iUnion₂_subset
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
#align set.subset_Inter Set.subset_iInter
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
#align set.subset_Inter₂ Set.subset_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
#align set.Union_subset_iff Set.iUnion_subset_iff
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
#align set.Union₂_subset_iff Set.iUnion₂_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
#align set.subset_Inter_iff Set.subset_iInter_iff
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
#align set.subset_Inter₂_iff Set.subset_iInter₂_iff
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
#align set.subset_Union Set.subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
#align set.Inter_subset Set.iInter_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
#align set.subset_Union₂ Set.subset_iUnion₂
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
#align set.Inter₂_subset Set.iInter₂_subset
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
#align set.subset_Union_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion_of_subset
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
#align set.Inter_subset_of_subset Set.iInter_subset_of_subset
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
#align set.subset_Union₂_of_subset Set.subset_iUnion₂_of_subset
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
#align set.Inter₂_subset_of_subset Set.iInter₂_subset_of_subset
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
#align set.Union_mono Set.iUnion_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
#align set.Union₂_mono Set.iUnion₂_mono
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
#align set.Inter_mono Set.iInter_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
#align set.Inter₂_mono Set.iInter₂_mono
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
#align set.Union_mono' Set.iUnion_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
#align set.Union₂_mono' Set.iUnion₂_mono'
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
#align set.Inter_mono' Set.iInter_mono'
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
#align set.Inter₂_mono' Set.iInter₂_mono'
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Union₂_subset_Union Set.iUnion₂_subset_iUnion
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
#align set.Inter_subset_Inter₂ Set.iInter_subset_iInter₂
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
#align set.Union_set_of Set.iUnion_setOf
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
#align set.Inter_set_of Set.iInter_setOf
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
#align set.Union_congr_of_surjective Set.iUnion_congr_of_surjective
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
#align set.Inter_congr_of_surjective Set.iInter_congr_of_surjective
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
#align set.Union_congr Set.iUnion_congr
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
#align set.Inter_congr Set.iInter_congr
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
#align set.Union₂_congr Set.iUnion₂_congr
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
#align set.Inter₂_congr Set.iInter₂_congr
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
#align set.compl_Union Set.compl_iUnion
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
#align set.compl_Union₂ Set.compl_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
#align set.compl_Inter Set.compl_iInter
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
#align set.compl_Inter₂ Set.compl_iInter₂
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
#align set.Union_eq_compl_Inter_compl Set.iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
#align set.Inter_eq_compl_Union_compl Set.iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
#align set.inter_Union Set.inter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
#align set.Union_inter Set.iUnion_inter
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
#align set.Union_union_distrib Set.iUnion_union_distrib
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
#align set.Inter_inter_distrib Set.iInter_inter_distrib
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
#align set.union_Union Set.union_iUnion
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
#align set.Union_union Set.iUnion_union
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
#align set.inter_Inter Set.inter_iInter
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
#align set.Inter_inter Set.iInter_inter
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_Inter Set.union_iInter
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.Inter_union Set.iInter_union
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
#align set.Union_diff Set.iUnion_diff
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
#align set.diff_Union Set.diff_iUnion
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
#align set.diff_Inter Set.diff_iInter
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
#align set.Union_inter_subset Set.iUnion_inter_subset
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_monotone Set.iUnion_inter_of_monotone
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Union_inter_of_antitone Set.iUnion_inter_of_antitone
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_monotone Set.iInter_union_of_monotone
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
#align set.Inter_union_of_antitone Set.iInter_union_of_antitone
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
#align set.Union_Inter_subset Set.iUnion_iInter_subset
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
#align set.Union_option Set.iUnion_option
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
#align set.Inter_option Set.iInter_option
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_dite Set.iUnion_dite
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
#align set.Union_ite Set.iUnion_ite
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_dite Set.iInter_dite
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
#align set.Inter_ite Set.iInter_ite
end
theorem image_projection_prod {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} {v : ∀ i : ι, Set (α i)}
(hv : (pi univ v).Nonempty) (i : ι) :
((fun x : ∀ i : ι, α i => x i) '' ⋂ k, (fun x : ∀ j : ι, α j => x k) ⁻¹' v k) = v i := by
classical
apply Subset.antisymm
· simp [iInter_subset]
· intro y y_in
simp only [mem_image, mem_iInter, mem_preimage]
rcases hv with ⟨z, hz⟩
refine ⟨Function.update z i y, ?_, update_same i y z⟩
rw [@forall_update_iff ι α _ z i y fun i t => t ∈ v i]
exact ⟨y_in, fun j _ => by simpa using hz j⟩
#align set.image_projection_prod Set.image_projection_prod
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
#align set.Inter_false Set.iInter_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
#align set.Union_false Set.iUnion_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
#align set.Inter_true Set.iInter_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
#align set.Union_true Set.iUnion_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
#align set.Inter_exists Set.iInter_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_exists Set.iUnion_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
#align set.Union_empty Set.iUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
#align set.Inter_univ Set.iInter_univ
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
#align set.Union_eq_empty Set.iUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
#align set.Inter_eq_univ Set.iInter_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_Union Set.nonempty_iUnion
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
#align set.nonempty_bUnion Set.nonempty_biUnion
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
#align set.Union_nonempty_index Set.iUnion_nonempty_index
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_right Set.iInter_iInter_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
#align set.Union_Union_eq_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
#align set.Union_Union_eq_right Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
#align set.Inter_or Set.iInter_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
#align set.Union_or Set.iUnion_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
#align set.Union_and Set.iUnion_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
#align set.Inter_and Set.iInter_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
#align set.Union_comm Set.iUnion_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
#align set.Inter_comm Set.iInter_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
#align set.Union₂_comm Set.iUnion₂_comm
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
#align set.Inter₂_comm Set.iInter₂_comm
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
#align set.bUnion_and Set.biUnion_and
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_and' Set.biUnion_and'
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
#align set.bInter_and Set.biInter_and
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_and' Set.biInter_and'
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
#align set.Union_Union_eq_or_left Set.iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
#align set.Inter_Inter_eq_or_left Set.iInter_iInter_eq_or_left
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
#align set.mem_bUnion Set.mem_biUnion
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
#align set.mem_bInter Set.mem_biInter
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
-- Porting note: Why is this not just `subset_iUnion₂ x xs`?
@subset_iUnion₂ β α (· ∈ s) (fun i _ => u i) x xs
#align set.subset_bUnion_of_mem Set.subset_biUnion_of_mem
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
#align set.bInter_subset_of_mem Set.biInter_subset_of_mem
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bUnion_subset_bUnion_left Set.biUnion_subset_biUnion_left
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
#align set.bInter_subset_bInter_left Set.biInter_subset_biInter_left
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
#align set.bUnion_mono Set.biUnion_mono
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
#align set.bInter_mono Set.biInter_mono
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
#align set.bUnion_eq_Union Set.biUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
#align set.bInter_eq_Inter Set.biInter_eq_iInter
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
#align set.Union_subtype Set.iUnion_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
#align set.Inter_subtype Set.iInter_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align set.bInter_empty Set.biInter_empty
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
#align set.bInter_univ Set.biInter_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
#align set.bUnion_self Set.biUnion_self
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
#align set.Union_nonempty_self Set.iUnion_nonempty_self
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
#align set.bInter_singleton Set.biInter_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
#align set.bInter_union Set.biInter_union
theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bInter_insert Set.biInter_insert
theorem biInter_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∩ s b := by
rw [biInter_insert, biInter_singleton]
#align set.bInter_pair Set.biInter_pair
theorem biInter_inter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, f i ∩ t = (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) ∩ t := by
haveI : Nonempty s := hs.to_subtype
simp [biInter_eq_iInter, ← iInter_inter]
#align set.bInter_inter Set.biInter_inter
theorem inter_biInter {ι α : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (f : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) :
⋂ i ∈ s, t ∩ f i = t ∩ ⋂ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [inter_comm, ← biInter_inter hs]
simp [inter_comm]
#align set.inter_bInter Set.inter_biInter
theorem biUnion_empty (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), s x = ∅ :=
iSup_emptyset
#align set.bUnion_empty Set.biUnion_empty
theorem biUnion_univ (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ @univ α, s x = ⋃ x, s x :=
iSup_univ
#align set.bUnion_univ Set.biUnion_univ
theorem biUnion_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iSup_singleton
#align set.bUnion_singleton Set.biUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_of_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, {x} = s :=
ext <| by simp
#align set.bUnion_of_singleton Set.biUnion_of_singleton
theorem biUnion_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋃ x ∈ s, u x) ∪ ⋃ x ∈ t, u x :=
iSup_union
#align set.bUnion_union Set.biUnion_union
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋃ i, f i = ⋃ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iUnion_subtype _ _
#align set.Union_coe_set Set.iUnion_coe_set
@[simp]
theorem iInter_coe_set {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (f : s → Set β) :
⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i ∈ s, f ⟨i, ‹i ∈ s›⟩ :=
iInter_subtype _ _
#align set.Inter_coe_set Set.iInter_coe_set
theorem biUnion_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∪ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := by simp
#align set.bUnion_insert Set.biUnion_insert
theorem biUnion_pair (a b : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ x ∈ ({a, b} : Set α), s x = s a ∪ s b := by
simp
#align set.bUnion_pair Set.biUnion_pair
theorem inter_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∩ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s ∩ t i j := by simp only [inter_iUnion]
#align set.inter_Union₂ Set.inter_iUnion₂
theorem iUnion₂_inter (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ∩ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ∩ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_inter]
#align set.Union₂_inter Set.iUnion₂_inter
theorem union_iInter₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_iInter]
#align set.union_Inter₂ Set.union_iInter₂
theorem iInter₂_union (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [iInter_union]
#align set.Inter₂_union Set.iInter₂_union
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∈ t) (ht : t ∈ S) :
x ∈ ⋃₀S :=
⟨t, ht, hx⟩
#align set.mem_sUnion_of_mem Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem
-- is this theorem really necessary?
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion {x : α} {t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hx : x ∉ ⋃₀S)
(ht : t ∈ S) : x ∉ t := fun h => hx ⟨t, ht, h⟩
#align set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion Set.not_mem_of_not_mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_subset_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : ⋂₀ S ⊆ t :=
sInf_le tS
#align set.sInter_subset_of_mem Set.sInter_subset_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_mem {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (tS : t ∈ S) : t ⊆ ⋃₀S :=
le_sSup tS
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_mem Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
theorem subset_sUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} (t : Set (Set α)) (u : Set α) (h₁ : s ⊆ u)
(h₂ : u ∈ t) : s ⊆ ⋃₀t :=
Subset.trans h₁ (subset_sUnion_of_mem h₂)
#align set.subset_sUnion_of_subset Set.subset_sUnion_of_subset
theorem sUnion_subset {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t' ⊆ t) : ⋃₀S ⊆ t :=
sSup_le h
#align set.sUnion_subset Set.sUnion_subset
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_subset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : ⋃₀s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ t' ∈ s, t' ⊆ t :=
sSup_le_iff
#align set.sUnion_subset_iff Set.sUnion_subset_iff
lemma sUnion_mono_subsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, t ⊆ f t) :
⋃₀ s ⊆ ⋃₀ (f '' s) :=
fun _ ⟨t, htx, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨f t, mem_image_of_mem f htx, hf t hxt⟩
lemma sUnion_mono_supsets {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Set α → Set α} (hf : ∀ t : Set α, f t ⊆ t) :
⋃₀ (f '' s) ⊆ ⋃₀ s :=
-- If t ∈ f '' s is arbitrary; t = f u for some u : Set α.
fun _ ⟨_, ⟨u, hus, hut⟩, hxt⟩ ↦ ⟨u, hus, (hut ▸ hf u) hxt⟩
theorem subset_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t') : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
le_sInf h
#align set.subset_sInter Set.subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem subset_sInter_iff {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : t ⊆ ⋂₀ S ↔ ∀ t' ∈ S, t ⊆ t' :=
le_sInf_iff
#align set.subset_sInter_iff Set.subset_sInter_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem sUnion_subset_sUnion {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋃₀S ⊆ ⋃₀T :=
sUnion_subset fun _ hs => subset_sUnion_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sUnion_subset_sUnion Set.sUnion_subset_sUnion
@[gcongr]
theorem sInter_subset_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ T) : ⋂₀ T ⊆ ⋂₀ S :=
subset_sInter fun _ hs => sInter_subset_of_mem (h hs)
#align set.sInter_subset_sInter Set.sInter_subset_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀∅ = (∅ : Set α) :=
sSup_empty
#align set.sUnion_empty Set.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ ∅ = (univ : Set α) :=
sInf_empty
#align set.sInter_empty Set.sInter_empty
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋃₀{s} = s :=
sSup_singleton
#align set.sUnion_singleton Set.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s} = s :=
sInf_singleton
#align set.sInter_singleton Set.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_eq_empty {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀S = ∅ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = ∅ :=
sSup_eq_bot
#align set.sUnion_eq_empty Set.sUnion_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_eq_univ {S : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ S = univ ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, s = univ :=
sInf_eq_top
#align set.sInter_eq_univ Set.sInter_eq_univ
theorem subset_powerset_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {t : Set α} : s ⊆ 𝒫 t ↔ ⋃₀ s ⊆ t :=
sUnion_subset_iff.symm
theorem sUnion_powerset_gc :
GaloisConnection (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gc_sSup_Iic
def sUnion_powerset_gi :
GaloisInsertion (⋃₀ · : Set (Set α) → Set α) (𝒫 · : Set α → Set (Set α)) :=
gi_sSup_Iic
theorem sUnion_mem_empty_univ {S : Set (Set α)} (h : S ⊆ {∅, univ}) :
⋃₀ S ∈ ({∅, univ} : Set (Set α)) := by
simp only [mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, sUnion_eq_empty, not_forall]
rintro ⟨s, hs, hne⟩
obtain rfl : s = univ := (h hs).resolve_left hne
exact univ_subset_iff.1 <| subset_sUnion_of_mem hs
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} : (⋃₀S).Nonempty ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, Set.Nonempty s := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
#align set.nonempty_sUnion Set.nonempty_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} (h : (⋃₀s).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨s, hs, _⟩ := nonempty_sUnion.1 h
⟨s, hs⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion
theorem Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Set α)} (h : ⋃₀s = univ) : s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_sUnion <| h.symm ▸ univ_nonempty
#align set.nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ Set.Nonempty.of_sUnion_eq_univ
theorem sUnion_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(S ∪ T) = ⋃₀S ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_union
#align set.sUnion_union Set.sUnion_union
theorem sInter_union (S T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (S ∪ T) = ⋂₀ S ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_union
#align set.sInter_union Set.sInter_union
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀insert s T = s ∪ ⋃₀T :=
sSup_insert
#align set.sUnion_insert Set.sUnion_insert
@[simp]
theorem sInter_insert (s : Set α) (T : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ insert s T = s ∩ ⋂₀ T :=
sInf_insert
#align set.sInter_insert Set.sInter_insert
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_diff_singleton_empty (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀(s \ {∅}) = ⋃₀s :=
sSup_diff_singleton_bot s
#align set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty Set.sUnion_diff_singleton_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_diff_singleton_univ (s : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ (s \ {univ}) = ⋂₀ s :=
sInf_diff_singleton_top s
#align set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ Set.sInter_diff_singleton_univ
theorem sUnion_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋃₀{s, t} = s ∪ t :=
sSup_pair
#align set.sUnion_pair Set.sUnion_pair
theorem sInter_pair (s t : Set α) : ⋂₀ {s, t} = s ∩ t :=
sInf_pair
#align set.sInter_pair Set.sInter_pair
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋃₀(f '' s) = ⋃ x ∈ s, f x :=
sSup_image
#align set.sUnion_image Set.sUnion_image
@[simp]
theorem sInter_image (f : α → Set β) (s : Set α) : ⋂₀ (f '' s) = ⋂ x ∈ s, f x :=
sInf_image
#align set.sInter_image Set.sInter_image
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋃₀range f = ⋃ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sUnion_range Set.sUnion_range
@[simp]
theorem sInter_range (f : ι → Set β) : ⋂₀ range f = ⋂ x, f x :=
rfl
#align set.sInter_range Set.sInter_range
theorem iUnion_eq_univ_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, f i = univ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion_eq_univ_iff
theorem iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp only [iUnion_eq_univ_iff, mem_iUnion]
#align set.Union₂_eq_univ_iff Set.iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff
theorem sUnion_eq_univ_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀c = univ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff Set.sUnion_eq_univ_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, f i = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, ∃ i, x ∉ f i := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.Inter_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem iInter₂_eq_empty_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ i j, a ∉ s i j := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iInter, not_forall]
#align set.Inter₂_eq_empty_iff Set.iInter₂_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_empty_iff {c : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ c = ∅ ↔ ∀ a, ∃ b ∈ c, a ∉ b := by
simp [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.sInter_eq_empty_iff Set.sInter_eq_empty_iff
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iInter {f : ι → Set α} : (⋂ i, f i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, iInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_Inter Set.nonempty_iInter
-- classical
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp`. `simp` can prove it
theorem nonempty_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j := by
simp
#align set.nonempty_Inter₂ Set.nonempty_iInter₂
-- classical
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_sInter {c : Set (Set α)} : (⋂₀ c).Nonempty ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b ∈ c, a ∈ b := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, sInter_eq_empty_iff]
#align set.nonempty_sInter Set.nonempty_sInter
-- classical
theorem compl_sUnion (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋃₀S)ᶜ = ⋂₀ (compl '' S) :=
ext fun x => by simp
#align set.compl_sUnion Set.compl_sUnion
-- classical
theorem sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀S = (⋂₀ (compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋃₀S), compl_sUnion]
#align set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl Set.sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl
-- classical
theorem compl_sInter (S : Set (Set α)) : (⋂₀ S)ᶜ = ⋃₀(compl '' S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_compl_sInter_compl, compl_compl_image]
#align set.compl_sInter Set.compl_sInter
-- classical
theorem sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl (S : Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ S = (⋃₀(compl '' S))ᶜ := by
rw [← compl_compl (⋂₀ S), compl_sInter]
#align set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl Set.sInter_eq_compl_sUnion_compl
theorem inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty {s t : Set α} {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : t ∈ S)
(h : s ∩ ⋃₀S = ∅) : s ∩ t = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty <| by
rw [← h]; exact inter_subset_inter_right _ (subset_sUnion_of_mem hs)
#align set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty Set.inter_empty_of_inter_sUnion_empty
theorem range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range {γ : α → Type*} (f : Sigma γ → β) :
range f = ⋃ a, range fun b => f ⟨a, b⟩ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align set.range_sigma_eq_Union_range Set.range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range
theorem iUnion_eq_range_sigma (s : α → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σi, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_sigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_sigma
theorem iUnion_eq_range_psigma (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = range fun a : Σ'i, s i => a.2 := by
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_eq_range_psigma Set.iUnion_eq_range_psigma
theorem iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self {ι : Type*} {σ : ι → Type*} (s : Set (Sigma σ)) :
⋃ i, Sigma.mk i '' (Sigma.mk i ⁻¹' s) = s := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_preimage]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
exact h
· intro h
cases' x with i a
exact ⟨i, a, h, rfl⟩
#align set.Union_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self Set.iUnion_image_preimage_sigma_mk_eq_self
theorem Sigma.univ (X : α → Type*) : (Set.univ : Set (Σa, X a)) = ⋃ a, range (Sigma.mk a) :=
Set.ext fun x =>
iff_of_true trivial ⟨range (Sigma.mk x.1), Set.mem_range_self _, x.2, Sigma.eta x⟩
#align set.sigma.univ Set.Sigma.univ
alias sUnion_mono := sUnion_subset_sUnion
#align set.sUnion_mono Set.sUnion_mono
theorem iUnion_subset_iUnion_const {s : Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) : ⋃ _ : ι, s ⊆ ⋃ _ : ι₂, s :=
iSup_const_mono (α := Set α) h
#align set.Union_subset_Union_const Set.iUnion_subset_iUnion_const
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_singleton_eq_range {α β : Type*} (f : α → β) : ⋃ x : α, {f x} = range f := by
ext x
simp [@eq_comm _ x]
#align set.Union_singleton_eq_range Set.iUnion_singleton_eq_range
theorem iUnion_of_singleton (α : Type*) : (⋃ x, {x} : Set α) = univ := by simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align set.Union_of_singleton Set.iUnion_of_singleton
theorem iUnion_of_singleton_coe (s : Set α) : ⋃ i : s, ({(i : α)} : Set α) = s := by simp
#align set.Union_of_singleton_coe Set.iUnion_of_singleton_coe
theorem sUnion_eq_biUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sUnion_image, image_id']
#align set.sUnion_eq_bUnion Set.sUnion_eq_biUnion
theorem sInter_eq_biInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ (i : Set α) (_ : i ∈ s), i := by
rw [← sInter_image, image_id']
#align set.sInter_eq_bInter Set.sInter_eq_biInter
theorem sUnion_eq_iUnion {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋃₀s = ⋃ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sUnion_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sUnion_eq_Union Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion
theorem sInter_eq_iInter {s : Set (Set α)} : ⋂₀ s = ⋂ i : s, i := by
simp only [← sInter_range, Subtype.range_coe]
#align set.sInter_eq_Inter Set.sInter_eq_iInter
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_of_empty _
#align set.Union_of_empty Set.iUnion_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem iInter_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] (s : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_of_empty _
#align set.Inter_of_empty Set.iInter_of_empty
theorem union_eq_iUnion {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = ⋃ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
sup_eq_iSup s₁ s₂
#align set.union_eq_Union Set.union_eq_iUnion
theorem inter_eq_iInter {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = ⋂ b : Bool, cond b s₁ s₂ :=
inf_eq_iInf s₁ s₂
#align set.inter_eq_Inter Set.inter_eq_iInter
theorem sInter_union_sInter {S T : Set (Set α)} :
⋂₀ S ∪ ⋂₀ T = ⋂ p ∈ S ×ˢ T, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∪ p.2 :=
sInf_sup_sInf
#align set.sInter_union_sInter Set.sInter_union_sInter
theorem sUnion_inter_sUnion {s t : Set (Set α)} :
⋃₀s ∩ ⋃₀t = ⋃ p ∈ s ×ˢ t, (p : Set α × Set α).1 ∩ p.2 :=
sSup_inf_sSup
#align set.sUnion_inter_sUnion Set.sUnion_inter_sUnion
theorem biUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋃ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iUnion_comm _ ι]
#align set.bUnion_Union Set.biUnion_iUnion
theorem biInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ ⋃ i, s i, t x = ⋂ (i) (x ∈ s i), t x := by simp [@iInter_comm _ ι]
#align set.bInter_Union Set.biInter_iUnion
theorem sUnion_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋃₀⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, ⋃₀s i := by
simp only [sUnion_eq_biUnion, biUnion_iUnion]
#align set.sUnion_Union Set.sUnion_iUnion
theorem sInter_iUnion (s : ι → Set (Set α)) : ⋂₀ ⋃ i, s i = ⋂ i, ⋂₀ s i := by
simp only [sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_iUnion]
#align set.sInter_Union Set.sInter_iUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_sUnion {α β : Type*} (C : Set (Set α)) {f : ∀ s : C, β → (s : Type _)}
(hf : ∀ s : C, Surjective (f s)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun s : C => (f s y).val) = ⋃₀C := by
ext x; constructor
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨_, hs, ?_⟩
exact (f ⟨s, hs⟩ y).2
· rintro ⟨s, hs, hx⟩
cases' hf ⟨s, hs⟩ ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
refine ⟨_, ⟨y, rfl⟩, ⟨s, hs⟩, ?_⟩
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hy
#align set.Union_range_eq_sUnion Set.iUnion_range_eq_sUnion
theorem iUnion_range_eq_iUnion (C : ι → Set α) {f : ∀ x : ι, β → C x}
(hf : ∀ x : ι, Surjective (f x)) : ⋃ y : β, range (fun x : ι => (f x y).val) = ⋃ x, C x := by
ext x; rw [mem_iUnion, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, (f i y).2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hx⟩
cases' hf i ⟨x, hx⟩ with y hy
exact ⟨y, i, congr_arg Subtype.val hy⟩
#align set.Union_range_eq_Union Set.iUnion_range_eq_iUnion
theorem union_distrib_iInter_left (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (t ∪ ⋂ i, s i) = ⋂ i, t ∪ s i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_left Set.union_distrib_iInter_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_left (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) :
(s ∪ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋂ (i) (j), s ∪ t i j := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_left]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_left Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_left
theorem union_distrib_iInter_right (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set α) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
#align set.union_distrib_Inter_right Set.union_distrib_iInter_right
theorem union_distrib_iInter₂_right (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ∪ t = ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ∪ t := by simp_rw [union_distrib_iInter_right]
#align set.union_distrib_Inter₂_right Set.union_distrib_iInter₂_right
section Function
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃₀ S) t ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, MapsTo f s t :=
sUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_sUnion Set.mapsTo_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) t ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) t :=
iUnion_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) t ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) t :=
iUnion₂_subset_iff
#align set.maps_to_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂
theorem mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋃ i, s i) (⋃ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iUnion.2 fun i ↦ (H i).mono_right (subset_iUnion t i)
#align set.maps_to_Union_Union Set.mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion
theorem mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) (⋃ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion fun i => mapsTo_iUnion_iUnion (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Union₂_Union₂ Set.mapsTo_iUnion₂_iUnion₂
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_sInter {s : Set α} {T : Set (Set β)} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂₀ T) ↔ ∀ t ∈ T, MapsTo f s t :=
forall₂_swap
#align set.maps_to_sInter Set.mapsTo_sInter
@[simp]
theorem mapsTo_iInter {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, MapsTo f s (t i) :=
mapsTo_sInter.trans forall_mem_range
#align set.maps_to_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β} :
MapsTo f s (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, MapsTo f s (t i j) := by
simp only [mapsTo_iInter]
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂
theorem mapsTo_iInter_iInter {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i, MapsTo f (s i) (t i)) : MapsTo f (⋂ i, s i) (⋂ i, t i) :=
mapsTo_iInter.2 fun i => (H i).mono_left (iInter_subset s i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter_Inter Set.mapsTo_iInter_iInter
theorem mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β} {f : α → β}
(H : ∀ i j, MapsTo f (s i j) (t i j)) : MapsTo f (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) (⋂ (i) (j), t i j) :=
mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_iInter_iInter (H i)
#align set.maps_to_Inter₂_Inter₂ Set.mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂
theorem image_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set α) (f : α → β) : (f '' ⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, f '' s i :=
(mapsTo_iInter_iInter fun i => mapsTo_image f (s i)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter_subset Set.image_iInter_subset
theorem image_iInter₂_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (f : α → β) :
(f '' ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), f '' s i j :=
(mapsTo_iInter₂_iInter₂ fun i hi => mapsTo_image f (s i hi)).image_subset
#align set.image_Inter₂_subset Set.image_iInter₂_subset
theorem image_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set α)) (f : α → β) : f '' ⋂₀ S ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, f '' s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
apply image_iInter₂_subset
#align set.image_sInter_subset Set.image_sInter_subset
section
open Function
variable (s : Set β) {f : α → β} {U : ι → Set β} (hU : iUnion U = univ)
theorem injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Injective f ↔ ∀ i, Injective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_injective H, fun H x y e => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show f x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
injection @H i ⟨x, hi⟩ ⟨y, show f y ∈ U i from e ▸ hi⟩ (Subtype.ext e)
#align set.injective_iff_injective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
theorem surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Surjective f ↔ ∀ i, Surjective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by
refine ⟨fun H i => (U i).restrictPreimage_surjective H, fun H x => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ :=
Set.mem_iUnion.mp
(show x ∈ Set.iUnion U by rw [hU]; trivial)
exact ⟨_, congr_arg Subtype.val (H i ⟨x, hi⟩).choose_spec⟩
#align set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_Union_eq_univ Set.surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 1,515 | 1,519 | theorem bijective_iff_bijective_of_iUnion_eq_univ :
Bijective f ↔ ∀ i, Bijective ((U i).restrictPreimage f) := by |
rw [Bijective, injective_iff_injective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU,
surjective_iff_surjective_of_iUnion_eq_univ hU]
simp [Bijective, forall_and]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Zip
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
#align_import data.list.rotate from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_mod List.rotate_mod
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_nil List.rotate_nil
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
#align list.rotate_zero List.rotate_zero
-- Porting note: removing simp, simp can prove it
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
#align list.rotate'_nil List.rotate'_nil
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 53 | 53 | theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by | cases l <;> rfl
|
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Batteries.Tactic.Classical
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
import Mathlib.Mathport.Rename
#align_import data.list.tfae from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5a3e819569b0f12cbec59d740a2613018e7b8eec"
namespace List
def TFAE (l : List Prop) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x ↔ y
#align list.tfae List.TFAE
theorem tfae_nil : TFAE [] :=
forall_mem_nil _
#align list.tfae_nil List.tfae_nil
@[simp]
theorem tfae_singleton (p) : TFAE [p] := by simp [TFAE, -eq_iff_iff]
#align list.tfae_singleton List.tfae_singleton
theorem tfae_cons_of_mem {a b} {l : List Prop} (h : b ∈ l) : TFAE (a :: l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ TFAE l :=
⟨fun H => ⟨H a (by simp) b (Mem.tail a h),
fun p hp q hq => H _ (Mem.tail a hp) _ (Mem.tail a hq)⟩,
by
rintro ⟨ab, H⟩ p (_ | ⟨_, hp⟩) q (_ | ⟨_, hq⟩)
· rfl
· exact ab.trans (H _ h _ hq)
· exact (ab.trans (H _ h _ hp)).symm
· exact H _ hp _ hq⟩
#align list.tfae_cons_of_mem List.tfae_cons_of_mem
theorem tfae_cons_cons {a b} {l : List Prop} : TFAE (a :: b :: l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ TFAE (b :: l) :=
tfae_cons_of_mem (Mem.head _)
#align list.tfae_cons_cons List.tfae_cons_cons
@[simp]
theorem tfae_cons_self {a} {l : List Prop} : TFAE (a :: a :: l) ↔ TFAE (a :: l) := by
simp [tfae_cons_cons]
theorem tfae_of_forall (b : Prop) (l : List Prop) (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ↔ b) : TFAE l :=
fun _a₁ h₁ _a₂ h₂ => (h _ h₁).trans (h _ h₂).symm
#align list.tfae_of_forall List.tfae_of_forall
| Mathlib/Data/List/TFAE.lean | 63 | 71 | theorem tfae_of_cycle {a b} {l : List Prop} (h_chain : List.Chain (· → ·) a (b :: l))
(h_last : getLastD l b → a) : TFAE (a :: b :: l) := by |
induction l generalizing a b with
| nil => simp_all [tfae_cons_cons, iff_def]
| cons c l IH =>
simp only [tfae_cons_cons, getLastD_cons, tfae_singleton, and_true, chain_cons, Chain.nil] at *
rcases h_chain with ⟨ab, ⟨bc, ch⟩⟩
have := IH ⟨bc, ch⟩ (ab ∘ h_last)
exact ⟨⟨ab, h_last ∘ (this.2 c (.head _) _ (getLastD_mem_cons _ _)).1 ∘ bc⟩, this⟩
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.NumDen
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.ScaleRoots
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.rational_root from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"62c0a4ef1441edb463095ea02a06e87f3dfe135c"
open scoped Polynomial
section ScaleRoots
variable {A K R S : Type*} [CommRing A] [Field K] [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
variable {M : Submonoid A} [Algebra A S] [IsLocalization M S] [Algebra A K] [IsFractionRing A K]
open Finsupp IsFractionRing IsLocalization Polynomial
theorem scaleRoots_aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_mk'_eq_zero {p : A[X]} {r : A} {s : M}
(hr : aeval (mk' S r s) p = 0) : aeval (algebraMap A S r) (scaleRoots p s) = 0 := by
convert scaleRoots_eval₂_eq_zero (algebraMap A S) hr
-- Porting note: added
funext
rw [aeval_def, mk'_spec' _ r s]
#align scale_roots_aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_mk'_eq_zero scaleRoots_aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_mk'_eq_zero
variable [IsDomain A]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/RationalRoot.lean | 49 | 54 | theorem num_isRoot_scaleRoots_of_aeval_eq_zero [UniqueFactorizationMonoid A] {p : A[X]} {x : K}
(hr : aeval x p = 0) : IsRoot (scaleRoots p (den A x)) (num A x) := by |
apply isRoot_of_eval₂_map_eq_zero (IsFractionRing.injective A K)
refine scaleRoots_aeval_eq_zero_of_aeval_mk'_eq_zero ?_
rw [mk'_num_den]
exact hr
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SetFamily.Shadow
#align_import combinatorics.set_family.compression.uv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6f8ab7de1c4b78a68ab8cf7dd83d549eb78a68a1"
open Finset
variable {α : Type*}
theorem sup_sdiff_injOn [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (u v : α) :
{ x | Disjoint u x ∧ v ≤ x }.InjOn fun x => (x ⊔ u) \ v := by
rintro a ha b hb hab
have h : ((a ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v = ((b ⊔ u) \ v) \ u ⊔ v := by
dsimp at hab
rw [hab]
rwa [sdiff_sdiff_comm, ha.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sdiff_comm,
hb.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right, sdiff_sup_cancel ha.2, sdiff_sup_cancel hb.2] at h
#align sup_sdiff_inj_on sup_sdiff_injOn
-- The namespace is here to distinguish from other compressions.
namespace UV
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] [DecidableRel (@Disjoint α _ _)]
[DecidableRel ((· ≤ ·) : α → α → Prop)] {s : Finset α} {u v a b : α}
def compress (u v a : α) : α :=
if Disjoint u a ∧ v ≤ a then (a ⊔ u) \ v else a
#align uv.compress UV.compress
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le (hua : Disjoint u a) (hva : v ≤ a) :
compress u v a = (a ⊔ u) \ v :=
if_pos ⟨hua, hva⟩
#align uv.compress_of_disjoint_of_le UV.compress_of_disjoint_of_le
theorem compress_of_disjoint_of_le' (hva : Disjoint v a) (hua : u ≤ a) :
compress u v ((a ⊔ v) \ u) = a := by
rw [compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_right
(le_sdiff.2 ⟨(le_sup_right : v ≤ a ⊔ v), hva.mono_right hua⟩),
sdiff_sup_cancel (le_sup_of_le_left hua), hva.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right]
#align uv.compress_of_disjoint_of_le' UV.compress_of_disjoint_of_le'
@[simp]
theorem compress_self (u a : α) : compress u u a = a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h
· exact h.1.symm.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
· rfl
#align uv.compress_self UV.compress_self
@[simp]
theorem compress_sdiff_sdiff (a b : α) : compress (a \ b) (b \ a) b = a := by
refine (compress_of_disjoint_of_le disjoint_sdiff_self_left sdiff_le).trans ?_
rw [sup_sdiff_self_right, sup_sdiff, disjoint_sdiff_self_right.sdiff_eq_left, sup_eq_right]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le
#align uv.compress_sdiff_sdiff UV.compress_sdiff_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem compress_idem (u v a : α) : compress u v (compress u v a) = compress u v a := by
unfold compress
split_ifs with h h'
· rw [le_sdiff_iff.1 h'.2, sdiff_bot, sdiff_bot, sup_assoc, sup_idem]
· rfl
· rfl
#align uv.compress_idem UV.compress_idem
variable [DecidableEq α]
def compression (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
(s.filter (compress u v · ∈ s)) ∪ (s.image <| compress u v).filter (· ∉ s)
#align uv.compression UV.compression
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[FinsetFamily] notation "𝓒 " => UV.compression
open scoped FinsetFamily
def IsCompressed (u v : α) (s : Finset α) :=
𝓒 u v s = s
#align uv.is_compressed UV.IsCompressed
theorem compress_injOn : Set.InjOn (compress u v) ↑(s.filter (compress u v · ∉ s)) := by
intro a ha b hb hab
rw [mem_coe, mem_filter] at ha hb
rw [compress] at ha hab
split_ifs at ha hab with has
· rw [compress] at hb hab
split_ifs at hb hab with hbs
· exact sup_sdiff_injOn u v has hbs hab
· exact (hb.2 hb.1).elim
· exact (ha.2 ha.1).elim
#align uv.compress_inj_on UV.compress_injOn
theorem mem_compression :
a ∈ 𝓒 u v s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ compress u v a ∈ s ∨ a ∉ s ∧ ∃ b ∈ s, compress u v b = a := by
simp_rw [compression, mem_union, mem_filter, mem_image, and_comm]
#align uv.mem_compression UV.mem_compression
protected theorem IsCompressed.eq (h : IsCompressed u v s) : 𝓒 u v s = s := h
#align uv.is_compressed.eq UV.IsCompressed.eq
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/UV.lean | 165 | 173 | theorem compression_self (u : α) (s : Finset α) : 𝓒 u u s = s := by |
unfold compression
convert union_empty s
· ext a
rw [mem_filter, compress_self, and_self_iff]
· refine eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun a ha ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_filter, mem_image, compress_self] at ha
obtain ⟨⟨b, hb, rfl⟩, hb'⟩ := ha
exact hb' hb
|
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Bounded
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Compacts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
#align_import topology.continuous_function.compact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d3af0609f6db8691dffdc3e1fb7feb7da72698f2"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
open Set Filter Metric
open BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace ContinuousMap
variable {α β E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CompactSpace α] [MetricSpace β]
[NormedAddCommGroup E]
section
variable (α β)
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def equivBoundedOfCompact : C(α, β) ≃ (α →ᵇ β) :=
⟨mkOfCompact, BoundedContinuousFunction.toContinuousMap, fun f => by
ext
rfl, fun f => by
ext
rfl⟩
#align continuous_map.equiv_bounded_of_compact ContinuousMap.equivBoundedOfCompact
theorem uniformInducing_equivBoundedOfCompact : UniformInducing (equivBoundedOfCompact α β) :=
UniformInducing.mk'
(by
simp only [hasBasis_compactConvergenceUniformity.mem_iff, uniformity_basis_dist_le.mem_iff]
exact fun s =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, b⟩, ⟨_, ⟨ε, hε, hb⟩⟩, hs⟩ =>
⟨{ p | ∀ x, (p.1 x, p.2 x) ∈ b }, ⟨ε, hε, fun _ h x => hb ((dist_le hε.le).mp h x)⟩,
fun f g h => hs fun x _ => h x⟩,
fun ⟨_, ⟨ε, hε, ht⟩, hs⟩ =>
⟨⟨Set.univ, { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ ε }⟩, ⟨isCompact_univ, ⟨ε, hε, fun _ h => h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨f, g⟩ h => hs _ _ (ht ((dist_le hε.le).mpr fun x => h x (mem_univ x)))⟩⟩)
#align continuous_map.uniform_inducing_equiv_bounded_of_compact ContinuousMap.uniformInducing_equivBoundedOfCompact
theorem uniformEmbedding_equivBoundedOfCompact : UniformEmbedding (equivBoundedOfCompact α β) :=
{ uniformInducing_equivBoundedOfCompact α β with inj := (equivBoundedOfCompact α β).injective }
#align continuous_map.uniform_embedding_equiv_bounded_of_compact ContinuousMap.uniformEmbedding_equivBoundedOfCompact
-- Porting note: the following `simps` received a "maximum recursion depth" error
-- @[simps! (config := .asFn) apply symm_apply]
def addEquivBoundedOfCompact [AddMonoid β] [LipschitzAdd β] : C(α, β) ≃+ (α →ᵇ β) :=
({ toContinuousMapAddHom α β, (equivBoundedOfCompact α β).symm with } : (α →ᵇ β) ≃+ C(α, β)).symm
#align continuous_map.add_equiv_bounded_of_compact ContinuousMap.addEquivBoundedOfCompact
-- Porting note: added this `simp` lemma manually because of the `simps` error above
@[simp]
theorem addEquivBoundedOfCompact_symm_apply [AddMonoid β] [LipschitzAdd β] :
⇑((addEquivBoundedOfCompact α β).symm) = toContinuousMapAddHom α β :=
rfl
-- Porting note: added this `simp` lemma manually because of the `simps` error above
@[simp]
theorem addEquivBoundedOfCompact_apply [AddMonoid β] [LipschitzAdd β] :
⇑(addEquivBoundedOfCompact α β) = mkOfCompact :=
rfl
instance metricSpace : MetricSpace C(α, β) :=
(uniformEmbedding_equivBoundedOfCompact α β).comapMetricSpace _
#align continuous_map.metric_space ContinuousMap.metricSpace
@[simps! (config := .asFn) toEquiv apply symm_apply]
def isometryEquivBoundedOfCompact : C(α, β) ≃ᵢ (α →ᵇ β) where
isometry_toFun _ _ := rfl
toEquiv := equivBoundedOfCompact α β
#align continuous_map.isometry_equiv_bounded_of_compact ContinuousMap.isometryEquivBoundedOfCompact
end
@[simp]
theorem _root_.BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_mkOfCompact (f g : C(α, β)) :
dist (mkOfCompact f) (mkOfCompact g) = dist f g :=
rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_mk_of_compact BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_mkOfCompact
@[simp]
theorem _root_.BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_toContinuousMap (f g : α →ᵇ β) :
dist f.toContinuousMap g.toContinuousMap = dist f g :=
rfl
#align bounded_continuous_function.dist_to_continuous_map BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_toContinuousMap
open BoundedContinuousFunction
section
variable {f g : C(α, β)} {C : ℝ}
theorem dist_apply_le_dist (x : α) : dist (f x) (g x) ≤ dist f g := by
simp only [← dist_mkOfCompact, dist_coe_le_dist, ← mkOfCompact_apply]
#align continuous_map.dist_apply_le_dist ContinuousMap.dist_apply_le_dist
theorem dist_le (C0 : (0 : ℝ) ≤ C) : dist f g ≤ C ↔ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C := by
simp only [← dist_mkOfCompact, BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_le C0, mkOfCompact_apply]
#align continuous_map.dist_le ContinuousMap.dist_le
theorem dist_le_iff_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : dist f g ≤ C ↔ ∀ x, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ C := by
simp only [← dist_mkOfCompact, BoundedContinuousFunction.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty,
mkOfCompact_apply]
#align continuous_map.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty ContinuousMap.dist_le_iff_of_nonempty
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousFunction/Compact.lean | 146 | 147 | theorem dist_lt_iff_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : dist f g < C ↔ ∀ x : α, dist (f x) (g x) < C := by |
simp only [← dist_mkOfCompact, dist_lt_iff_of_nonempty_compact, mkOfCompact_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3fb84046afd187b710170887195d50bada934ee"
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric
open scoped Classical
open Topology NNReal Filter Asymptotics ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_strict_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
#align continuous_linear_equiv.has_fderiv_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_within_at ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
#align continuous_linear_equiv.fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.fderivWithin
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiable
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
#align continuous_linear_equiv.differentiable_on ContinuousLinearEquiv.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp.assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_strict_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv.comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_fderiv ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp' (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) =
fun x ↦ (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp L f x
theorem comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.differentiableWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 ((f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.differentiableWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm] at this
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (iso x) := by
simp only [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff,
preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiableOn_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun H y hy => ?_, fun H y hy => iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.2 (H _ hy)⟩
rw [← iso.apply_symm_apply y, ← comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
apply H
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_on_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_right_differentiable_iff {f : F → G} :
Differentiable 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [← differentiableOn_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.hasFDerivWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
have A : f = (f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm := by
rw [Function.comp.assoc, iso.self_comp_symm]
rfl
have B : f' = (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)).comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
rw [A, B]
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.hasFDerivWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) f' (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_within_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff', preimage_univ]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_has_fderiv_at_iff' ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_right_fderivWithin {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ⁻¹' s) x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 f s (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x)
· exact (iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff.2 h.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro h'
exact h (iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h')
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp]
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_right_fderiv_within ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_right_fderivWithin
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 267 | 270 | theorem comp_right_fderiv {f : F → G} {x : E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x = (fderiv 𝕜 f (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by |
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, ← iso.comp_right_fderivWithin, preimage_univ]
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
#align_import analysis.convex.gauge from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"373b03b5b9d0486534edbe94747f23cb3712f93d"
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
#align gauge gauge
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
#align gauge_def gauge_def
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
#align gauge_def' gauge_def'
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
#align absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
#align gauge_mono gauge_mono
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
#align exists_lt_of_gauge_lt exists_lt_of_gauge_lt
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
#align gauge_zero gauge_zero
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
#align gauge_zero' gauge_zero'
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
#align gauge_empty gauge_empty
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
#align gauge_of_subset_zero gauge_of_subset_zero
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ fun _ hx => hx.1.le
#align gauge_nonneg gauge_nonneg
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
#align gauge_neg gauge_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_neg gauge_neg_set_neg
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
#align gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
#align gauge_le_of_mem gauge_le_of_mem
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
#align gauge_le_eq gauge_le_eq
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
#align gauge_lt_eq' gauge_lt_eq'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 175 | 181 | theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by |
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orientation
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Orientation
import Mathlib.Tactic.LinearCombination
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.two_dim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cd8fafa2fac98e1a67097e8a91ad9901cfde48af"
noncomputable section
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
open FiniteDimensional
lemma FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two {K V : Type*} [DivisionRing K]
[AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Fact (finrank K V = 2)] : FiniteDimensional K V :=
.of_fact_finrank_eq_succ 1
attribute [local instance] FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")]
alias FiniteDimensional.finiteDimensional_of_fact_finrank_eq_two :=
FiniteDimensional.of_fact_finrank_eq_two
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [Fact (finrank ℝ E = 2)]
(o : Orientation ℝ E (Fin 2))
namespace Orientation
irreducible_def areaForm : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ := by
let z : E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ ≃ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
AlternatingMap.constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty.symm
let y : E [⋀^Fin 1]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E (E [⋀^Fin 0]→ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ℝ z ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap
exact y ∘ₗ AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap (R' := ℝ) o.volumeForm
#align orientation.area_form Orientation.areaForm
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
theorem areaForm_to_volumeForm (x y : E) : ω x y = o.volumeForm ![x, y] := by simp [areaForm]
#align orientation.area_form_to_volume_form Orientation.areaForm_to_volumeForm
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_apply_self (x : E) : ω x x = 0 := by
rw [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
refine o.volumeForm.map_eq_zero_of_eq ![x, x] ?_ (?_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· simp
· norm_num
#align orientation.area_form_apply_self Orientation.areaForm_apply_self
theorem areaForm_swap (x y : E) : ω x y = -ω y x := by
simp only [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
convert o.volumeForm.map_swap ![y, x] (_ : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1)
· ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
· norm_num
#align orientation.area_form_swap Orientation.areaForm_swap
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_neg_orientation : (-o).areaForm = -o.areaForm := by
ext x y
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm]
#align orientation.area_form_neg_orientation Orientation.areaForm_neg_orientation
def areaForm' : E →L[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ :=
LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap
(↑(LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap : (E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ) ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →L[ℝ] ℝ) ∘ₗ o.areaForm)
#align orientation.area_form' Orientation.areaForm'
@[simp]
theorem areaForm'_apply (x : E) :
o.areaForm' x = LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap (o.areaForm x) :=
rfl
#align orientation.area_form'_apply Orientation.areaForm'_apply
theorem abs_areaForm_le (x y : E) : |ω x y| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.abs_volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
#align orientation.abs_area_form_le Orientation.abs_areaForm_le
theorem areaForm_le (x y : E) : ω x y ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simpa [areaForm_to_volumeForm, Fin.prod_univ_succ] using o.volumeForm_apply_le ![x, y]
#align orientation.area_form_le Orientation.areaForm_le
theorem abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal {x y : E} (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) : |ω x y| = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [o.areaForm_to_volumeForm, o.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal]
· simp [Fin.prod_univ_succ]
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
· simp_all
· simpa using h
· simpa [real_inner_comm] using h
· simp_all
#align orientation.abs_area_form_of_orthogonal Orientation.abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal
theorem areaForm_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x y : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).areaForm x y =
o.areaForm (φ.symm x) (φ.symm y) := by
have : φ.symm ∘ ![x, y] = ![φ.symm x, φ.symm y] := by
ext i
fin_cases i <;> rfl
simp [areaForm_to_volumeForm, volumeForm_map, this]
#align orientation.area_form_map Orientation.areaForm_map
theorem areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x y : E) :
o.areaForm (φ x) (φ y) = o.areaForm x y := by
convert o.areaForm_map φ (φ x) (φ y)
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
· simp
· simp
#align orientation.area_form_comp_linear_isometry_equiv Orientation.areaForm_comp_linearIsometryEquiv
irreducible_def rightAngleRotationAux₁ : E →ₗ[ℝ] E :=
let to_dual : E ≃ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ :=
(InnerProductSpace.toDual ℝ E).toLinearEquiv ≪≫ₗ LinearMap.toContinuousLinearMap.symm
↑to_dual.symm ∘ₗ ω
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₁ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₁
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left (x y : E) : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
-- Porting note: split `simp only` for greater proof control
simp only [rightAngleRotationAux₁, LinearEquiv.trans_symm, LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv_symm,
LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, LinearEquiv.trans_apply,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv]
rw [InnerProductSpace.toDual_symm_apply]
norm_cast
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_aux₁_left Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right (x y : E) :
⟪x, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [real_inner_comm]
simp [o.areaForm_swap y x]
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_aux₁_right Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right
def rightAngleRotationAux₂ : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
{ o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ with
norm_map' := fun x => by
dsimp
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (norm_nonneg (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)) with h h
· rw [← h]
positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ h
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left]
exact o.areaForm_le x (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x)
· let K : Submodule ℝ E := ℝ ∙ x
have : Nontrivial Kᗮ := by
apply @FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_pos ℝ
have : finrank ℝ K ≤ Finset.card {x} := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_singleton]
exact finrank_span_le_card ({x} : Set E)
have : Finset.card {x} = 1 := Finset.card_singleton x
have : finrank ℝ K + finrank ℝ Kᗮ = finrank ℝ E := K.finrank_add_finrank_orthogonal
have : finrank ℝ E = 2 := Fact.out
linarith
obtain ⟨w, hw₀⟩ : ∃ w : Kᗮ, w ≠ 0 := exists_ne 0
have hw' : ⟪x, (w : E)⟫ = 0 := Submodule.mem_orthogonal_singleton_iff_inner_right.mp w.2
have hw : (w : E) ≠ 0 := fun h => hw₀ (Submodule.coe_eq_zero.mp h)
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_right ?_ (by rwa [norm_pos_iff] : 0 < ‖(w : E)‖)
rw [← o.abs_areaForm_of_orthogonal hw']
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x w]
exact abs_real_inner_le_norm (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) w }
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₂ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₂
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ (x : E) :
o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ (o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x) = -x := by
apply ext_inner_left ℝ
intro y
have : ⟪o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ y, o.rightAngleRotationAux₁ x⟫ = ⟪y, x⟫ :=
LinearIsometry.inner_map_map o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ y x
rw [o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right, ← o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left, this,
inner_neg_right]
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_aux₁_right_angle_rotation_aux₁ Orientation.rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁
irreducible_def rightAngleRotation : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry o.rightAngleRotationAux₂ (-o.rightAngleRotationAux₁)
(by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂]) (by ext; simp [rightAngleRotationAux₂])
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_left x y
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -ω x y := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.inner_rightAngleRotationAux₁_right x y
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation (x : E) : J (J x) = -x := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact o.rightAngleRotationAux₁_rightAngleRotationAux₁ x
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_symm :
LinearIsometryEquiv.symm J = LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) := by
rw [rightAngleRotation]
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearIsometry_injective rfl
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_symm Orientation.rightAngleRotation_symm
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_self (x : E) : ⟪J x, x⟫ = 0 := by simp
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_self Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_self
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap (x y : E) : ⟪x, J y⟫ = -⟪J x, y⟫ := by simp
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_swap Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap
theorem inner_rightAngleRotation_swap' (x y : E) : ⟪J x, y⟫ = -⟪x, J y⟫ := by
simp [o.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap x y]
#align orientation.inner_right_angle_rotation_swap' Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_swap'
theorem inner_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ⟪J x, J y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map J x y
#align orientation.inner_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) : ω (J x) y = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, neg_neg]
#align orientation.area_form_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) : ω x (J y) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← o.inner_rightAngleRotation_left, o.inner_comp_rightAngleRotation]
#align orientation.area_form_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp already proves this
theorem areaForm_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : ω (J x) (J y) = ω x y := by simp
#align orientation.area_form_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.areaForm_comp_rightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_rightAngleRotation :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J J = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by ext; simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_trans_right_angle_rotation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_trans_rightAngleRotation
theorem rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation (x : E) :
(-o).rightAngleRotation x = -o.rightAngleRotation x := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_neg_orientation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation
@[simp]
theorem rightAngleRotation_trans_neg_orientation :
(-o).rightAngleRotation = o.rightAngleRotation.trans (LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_neg_orientation
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_trans_neg_orientation Orientation.rightAngleRotation_trans_neg_orientation
theorem rightAngleRotation_map {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[hF : Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (x : F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation x =
φ (o.rightAngleRotation (φ.symm x)) := by
apply ext_inner_right ℝ
intro y
rw [inner_rightAngleRotation_left]
trans ⟪J (φ.symm x), φ.symm y⟫
· simp [o.areaForm_map]
trans ⟪φ (J (φ.symm x)), φ (φ.symm y)⟫
· rw [φ.inner_map_map]
· simp
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_map Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) (x : E) : φ (J x) = J (φ x) := by
convert (o.rightAngleRotation_map φ (φ x)).symm
· simp
· symm
rwa [← o.map_eq_iff_det_pos φ.toLinearEquiv] at hφ
rw [@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2), Fintype.card_fin]
#align orientation.linear_isometry_equiv_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation
theorem rightAngleRotation_map' {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
[Fact (finrank ℝ F = 2)] (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) φ.toLinearEquiv o).rightAngleRotation =
(φ.symm.trans o.rightAngleRotation).trans φ :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.rightAngleRotation_map φ
#align orientation.right_angle_rotation_map' Orientation.rightAngleRotation_map'
theorem linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation' (φ : E ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] E)
(hφ : 0 < LinearMap.det (φ.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[ℝ] E)) :
LinearIsometryEquiv.trans J φ = φ.trans J :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext <| o.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation φ hφ
#align orientation.linear_isometry_equiv_comp_right_angle_rotation' Orientation.linearIsometryEquiv_comp_rightAngleRotation'
def basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) : Basis (Fin 2) ℝ E :=
@basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ![x, J x]
(linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero (fun i => by fin_cases i <;> simp [hx])
(by
intro i j hij
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp_all))
(@Fact.out (finrank ℝ E = 2)).symm
#align orientation.basis_right_angle_rotation Orientation.basisRightAngleRotation
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisRightAngleRotation (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
⇑(o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) = ![x, J x] :=
coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank _ _
#align orientation.coe_basis_right_angle_rotation Orientation.coe_basisRightAngleRotation
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' (a x : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ • innerₛₗ ℝ a + ω a x • ω a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • innerₛₗ ℝ x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp only [Fin.mk_zero, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply, innerₛₗ_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, smul_eq_mul,
areaForm_apply_self, mul_zero, add_zero, Real.rpow_two, real_inner_comm]
ring
· simp only [Fin.mk_one, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, innerₛₗ_apply, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
areaForm_apply_self, neg_zero, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, zero_add, Real.rpow_two, mul_neg]
rw [o.areaForm_swap]
ring
#align orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_area_form_mul_area_form' Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm'
theorem inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm (a x y : E) :
⟪a, x⟫ * ⟪a, y⟫ + ω a x * ω a y = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm' a x)
#align orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_area_form_mul_area_form Orientation.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm
theorem inner_sq_add_areaForm_sq (a b : E) : ⟪a, b⟫ ^ 2 + ω a b ^ 2 = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ‖b‖ ^ 2 := by
simpa [sq, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq] using o.inner_mul_inner_add_areaForm_mul_areaForm a b b
#align orientation.inner_sq_add_area_form_sq Orientation.inner_sq_add_areaForm_sq
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub' (a x : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ • ω a - ω a x • innerₛₗ ℝ a = ‖a‖ ^ 2 • ω x := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha]
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation a ha).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· simp only [o.areaForm_swap a x, neg_smul, sub_neg_eq_add, Fin.mk_zero,
coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero, LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply,
areaForm_apply_self, smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, innerₛₗ_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq,
zero_add, Real.rpow_two]
ring
· simp only [Fin.mk_one, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_one, Matrix.head_cons,
LinearMap.sub_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, smul_eq_mul, innerₛₗ_apply, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
areaForm_apply_self, neg_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, Real.rpow_two, real_inner_comm]
ring
#align orientation.inner_mul_area_form_sub' Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub'
theorem inner_mul_areaForm_sub (a x y : E) : ⟪a, x⟫ * ω a y - ω a x * ⟪a, y⟫ = ‖a‖ ^ 2 * ω x y :=
congr_arg (fun f : E →ₗ[ℝ] ℝ => f y) (o.inner_mul_areaForm_sub' a x)
#align orientation.inner_mul_area_form_sub Orientation.inner_mul_areaForm_sub
theorem nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay (x y : E) :
0 ≤ ⟪x, y⟫ ∧ ω x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
constructor
· let a : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 0
let b : ℝ := (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).repr y 1
suffices ↑0 ≤ a * ‖x‖ ^ 2 ∧ b * ‖x‖ ^ 2 = 0 → SameRay ℝ x (a • x + b • J x) by
rw [← (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).sum_repr y]
simp only [Fin.sum_univ_succ, coe_basisRightAngleRotation, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
Fin.succ_zero_eq_one', Finset.univ_eq_empty, Finset.sum_empty, areaForm_apply_self,
map_smul, map_add, real_inner_smul_right, inner_add_right, Matrix.cons_val_one,
Matrix.head_cons, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right,
mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, zero_smul, one_smul]
exact this
rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
have hx' : 0 < ‖x‖ := by simpa using hx
have ha' : 0 ≤ a := nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_left ha (by positivity)
have hb' : b = 0 := eq_zero_of_ne_zero_of_mul_right_eq_zero (pow_ne_zero 2 hx'.ne') hb
exact (SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right x ha').add_right $ by simp [hb']
· intro h
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
simp only [inner_smul_right, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ,
areaForm_apply_self, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_zero, eq_self_iff_true,
and_true_iff]
positivity
#align orientation.nonneg_inner_and_area_form_eq_zero_iff_same_ray Orientation.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay
def kahler : E →ₗ[ℝ] E →ₗ[ℝ] ℂ :=
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ Complex.ofRealCLM ∘ₗ innerₛₗ ℝ +
LinearMap.llcomp ℝ E ℝ ℂ ((LinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℂ).flip Complex.I) ∘ₗ ω
#align orientation.kahler Orientation.kahler
theorem kahler_apply_apply (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = ⟪x, y⟫ + ω x y • Complex.I :=
rfl
#align orientation.kahler_apply_apply Orientation.kahler_apply_apply
theorem kahler_swap (x y : E) : o.kahler x y = conj (o.kahler y x) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal' r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
simp only [kahler_apply_apply]
rw [real_inner_comm, areaForm_swap]
simp [this]
#align orientation.kahler_swap Orientation.kahler_swap
@[simp]
theorem kahler_apply_self (x : E) : o.kahler x x = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
simp [kahler_apply_apply, real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq]
#align orientation.kahler_apply_self Orientation.kahler_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rightAngleRotation_left (x y : E) :
o.kahler (J x) y = -Complex.I * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
o.kahler_apply_apply, Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.real_smul]
linear_combination ω x y * Complex.I_sq
#align orientation.kahler_right_angle_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rightAngleRotation_left
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rightAngleRotation_right (x y : E) :
o.kahler x (J y) = Complex.I * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_right, o.inner_rightAngleRotation_right,
o.kahler_apply_apply, Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.real_smul]
linear_combination -ω x y * Complex.I_sq
#align orientation.kahler_right_angle_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rightAngleRotation_right
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: simp normal form is `kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation'`
theorem kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation (x y : E) : o.kahler (J x) (J y) = o.kahler x y := by
simp only [kahler_rightAngleRotation_left, kahler_rightAngleRotation_right]
linear_combination -o.kahler x y * Complex.I_sq
#align orientation.kahler_comp_right_angle_rotation Orientation.kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/TwoDim.lean | 521 | 523 | theorem kahler_comp_rightAngleRotation' (x y : E) :
-(Complex.I * (Complex.I * o.kahler x y)) = o.kahler x y := by |
linear_combination -o.kahler x y * Complex.I_sq
|
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.UnorderedInterval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Monoid
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.MinMax
#align_import data.set.pointwise.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
open Interval Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField α] {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff_of_neg h).symm
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, ← Ici_inter_Iio, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by
simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, ← Ioi_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(fun x => x * c) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (b / c) (a / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h, inter_comm]
#align set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg Set.preimage_mul_const_Icc_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Iio (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (lt_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Ioi (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_lt_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Iic (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (le_div_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici (a : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) : (c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Ici (a / c) :=
ext fun _x => (div_le_iff' h).symm
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ioc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ioi_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ico (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iio, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ico Set.preimage_const_mul_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Icc (a b : α) {c : α} (h : 0 < c) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Icc a b = Icc (a / c) (b / c) := by simp [← Ici_inter_Iic, h]
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Icc Set.preimage_const_mul_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iio a = Ioi (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iio_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iio_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioi a = Iio (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioi_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioi_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Iic a = Ici (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Iic_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Iic_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg (a : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ici a = Iic (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ici_of_neg a h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ici_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioo a b = Ioo (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioo_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioo_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ioc a b = Ico (b / c) (a / c) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ioc_of_neg a b h
#align set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg Set.preimage_const_mul_Ioc_of_neg
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/Interval.lean | 761 | 763 | theorem preimage_const_mul_Ico_of_neg (a b : α) {c : α} (h : c < 0) :
(c * ·) ⁻¹' Ico a b = Ioc (b / c) (a / c) := by |
simpa only [mul_comm] using preimage_mul_const_Ico_of_neg a b h
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup
#align_import number_theory.modular_forms.congruence_subgroups from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ae690b0c236e488a0043f6faa8ce3546e7f2f9c5"
local notation "SL(" n ", " R ")" => Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup (Fin n) R
attribute [-instance] Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.instCoeFun
local notation:1024 "↑ₘ" A:1024 => ((A : SL(2, ℤ)) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) ℤ)
open Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup Matrix
variable (N : ℕ)
local notation "SLMOD(" N ")" =>
@Matrix.SpecialLinearGroup.map (Fin 2) _ _ _ _ _ _ (Int.castRingHom (ZMod N))
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
@[simp]
theorem SL_reduction_mod_hom_val (N : ℕ) (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) :
∀ i j : Fin 2, (SLMOD(N) γ : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) (ZMod N)) i j = ((↑ₘγ i j : ℤ) : ZMod N) :=
fun _ _ => rfl
#align SL_reduction_mod_hom_val SL_reduction_mod_hom_val
def Gamma (N : ℕ) : Subgroup SL(2, ℤ) :=
SLMOD(N).ker
#align Gamma Gamma
theorem Gamma_mem' (N : ℕ) (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) : γ ∈ Gamma N ↔ SLMOD(N) γ = 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align Gamma_mem' Gamma_mem'
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/CongruenceSubgroups.lean | 56 | 66 | theorem Gamma_mem (N : ℕ) (γ : SL(2, ℤ)) : γ ∈ Gamma N ↔ ((↑ₘγ 0 0 : ℤ) : ZMod N) = 1 ∧
((↑ₘγ 0 1 : ℤ) : ZMod N) = 0 ∧ ((↑ₘγ 1 0 : ℤ) : ZMod N) = 0 ∧ ((↑ₘγ 1 1 : ℤ) : ZMod N) = 1 := by |
rw [Gamma_mem']
constructor
· intro h
simp [← SL_reduction_mod_hom_val N γ, h]
· intro h
ext i j
rw [SL_reduction_mod_hom_val N γ]
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp only [h]
exacts [h.1, h.2.1, h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
#align orientation.oangle Orientation.oangle
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
#align orientation.continuous_at_oangle Orientation.continuousAt_oangle
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_left Orientation.oangle_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
#align orientation.oangle_zero_right Orientation.oangle_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
#align orientation.oangle_self Orientation.oangle_self
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
#align orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one Orientation.ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
#align orientation.oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_rev
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
#align orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev Orientation.oangle_add_oangle_rev
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_left Orientation.oangle_neg_left
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_neg_right Orientation.oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
#align orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right Orientation.two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 243 | 243 | theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by | simp [oangle]
|
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
#align_import data.nat.count from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"dc6c365e751e34d100e80fe6e314c3c3e0fd2988"
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
section Count
variable [DecidablePred p]
def count (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(List.range n).countP p
#align nat.count Nat.count
@[simp]
theorem count_zero : count p 0 = 0 := by
rw [count, List.range_zero, List.countP, List.countP.go]
#align nat.count_zero Nat.count_zero
def CountSet.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i // i < n ∧ p i } := by
apply Fintype.ofFinset ((Finset.range n).filter p)
intro x
rw [mem_filter, mem_range]
rfl
#align nat.count_set.fintype Nat.CountSet.fintype
scoped[Count] attribute [instance] Nat.CountSet.fintype
open Count
theorem count_eq_card_filter_range (n : ℕ) : count p n = ((range n).filter p).card := by
rw [count, List.countP_eq_length_filter]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_filter_range Nat.count_eq_card_filter_range
theorem count_eq_card_fintype (n : ℕ) : count p n = Fintype.card { k : ℕ // k < n ∧ p k } := by
rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, ← Fintype.card_ofFinset, ← CountSet.fintype]
rfl
#align nat.count_eq_card_fintype Nat.count_eq_card_fintype
theorem count_succ (n : ℕ) : count p (n + 1) = count p n + if p n then 1 else 0 := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [count, List.range_succ, h]
#align nat.count_succ Nat.count_succ
@[mono]
theorem count_monotone : Monotone (count p) :=
monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n ↦ by by_cases h : p n <;> simp [count_succ, h]
#align nat.count_monotone Nat.count_monotone
theorem count_add (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count p a + count (fun k ↦ p (a + k)) b := by
have : Disjoint ((range a).filter p) (((range b).map <| addLeftEmbedding a).filter p) := by
apply disjoint_filter_filter
rw [Finset.disjoint_left]
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_range, addLeftEmbedding_apply]
rintro x hx ⟨c, _, rfl⟩
exact (self_le_add_right _ _).not_lt hx
simp_rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, range_add, filter_union, card_union_of_disjoint this,
filter_map, addLeftEmbedding, card_map]
rfl
#align nat.count_add Nat.count_add
theorem count_add' (a b : ℕ) : count p (a + b) = count (fun k ↦ p (k + b)) a + count p b := by
rw [add_comm, count_add, add_comm]
simp_rw [add_comm b]
#align nat.count_add' Nat.count_add'
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Count.lean | 91 | 91 | theorem count_one : count p 1 = if p 0 then 1 else 0 := by | simp [count_succ]
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Monoidal.Category
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
#align_import category_theory.monoidal.functor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
open CategoryTheory
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Functor
namespace CategoryTheory
section
open MonoidalCategory
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v₁} C] [MonoidalCategory.{v₁} C] (D : Type u₂) [Category.{v₂} D]
[MonoidalCategory.{v₂} D]
-- The direction of `left_unitality` and `right_unitality` as simp lemmas may look strange:
-- remember the rule of thumb that component indices of natural transformations
-- "weigh more" than structural maps.
-- (However by this argument `associativity` is currently stated backwards!)
structure LaxMonoidalFunctor extends C ⥤ D where
ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ obj (𝟙_ C)
μ : ∀ X Y : C, obj X ⊗ obj Y ⟶ obj (X ⊗ Y)
μ_natural_left :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (X' : C),
map f ▷ obj X' ≫ μ Y X' = μ X X' ≫ map (f ▷ X') := by
aesop_cat
μ_natural_right :
∀ {X Y : C} (X' : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) ,
obj X' ◁ map f ≫ μ X' Y = μ X' X ≫ map (X' ◁ f) := by
aesop_cat
associativity :
∀ X Y Z : C,
μ X Y ▷ obj Z ≫ μ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (obj X) (obj Y) (obj Z)).hom ≫ obj X ◁ μ Y Z ≫ μ X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat
-- unitality
left_unitality : ∀ X : C, (λ_ (obj X)).hom = ε ▷ obj X ≫ μ (𝟙_ C) X ≫ map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
right_unitality : ∀ X : C, (ρ_ (obj X)).hom = obj X ◁ ε ≫ μ X (𝟙_ C) ≫ map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: remove this configuration and use the default configuration.
-- We keep this to be consistent with Lean 3.
-- See also `initialize_simps_projections MonoidalFunctor` below.
-- This may require waiting on https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/2936
initialize_simps_projections LaxMonoidalFunctor (+toFunctor, -obj, -map)
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_left
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural_right
attribute [simp] LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality
attribute [simp] LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity
-- When `rewrite_search` lands, add @[search] attributes to
-- LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality
-- LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality LaxMonoidalFunctor.associativity
section
variable {C D}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.μ_natural (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) {X Y X' Y' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y') :
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ F.μ Y Y' = F.μ X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simps]
def LaxMonoidalFunctor.ofTensorHom (F : C ⥤ D)
(ε : 𝟙_ D ⟶ F.obj (𝟙_ C))
(μ : ∀ X Y : C, F.obj X ⊗ F.obj Y ⟶ F.obj (X ⊗ Y))
(μ_natural :
∀ {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y'),
(F.map f ⊗ F.map g) ≫ μ Y Y' = μ X X' ≫ F.map (f ⊗ g) := by
aesop_cat)
(associativity :
∀ X Y Z : C,
(μ X Y ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj Z)) ≫ μ (X ⊗ Y) Z ≫ F.map (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (F.obj X) (F.obj Y) (F.obj Z)).hom ≫ (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ μ Y Z) ≫ μ X (Y ⊗ Z) := by
aesop_cat)
(left_unitality :
∀ X : C, (λ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (ε ⊗ 𝟙 (F.obj X)) ≫ μ (𝟙_ C) X ≫ F.map (λ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat)
(right_unitality :
∀ X : C, (ρ_ (F.obj X)).hom = (𝟙 (F.obj X) ⊗ ε) ≫ μ X (𝟙_ C) ≫ F.map (ρ_ X).hom := by
aesop_cat) :
LaxMonoidalFunctor C D where
obj := F.obj
map := F.map
map_id := F.map_id
map_comp := F.map_comp
ε := ε
μ := μ
μ_natural_left := fun f X' => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← F.map_id, μ_natural]
μ_natural_right := fun X' f => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, ← F.map_id, μ_natural]
associativity := fun X Y Z => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, ← id_tensorHom, associativity]
left_unitality := fun X => by
simp_rw [← tensorHom_id, left_unitality]
right_unitality := fun X => by
simp_rw [← id_tensorHom, right_unitality]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality_inv (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) (X : C) :
(λ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.ε ▷ F.obj X ≫ F.μ (𝟙_ C) X = F.map (λ_ X).inv := by
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, F.left_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.toFunctor.map_id, comp_id]
#align category_theory.lax_monoidal_functor.left_unitality_inv CategoryTheory.LaxMonoidalFunctor.left_unitality_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Functor.lean | 171 | 174 | theorem LaxMonoidalFunctor.right_unitality_inv (F : LaxMonoidalFunctor C D) (X : C) :
(ρ_ (F.obj X)).inv ≫ F.obj X ◁ F.ε ≫ F.μ X (𝟙_ C) = F.map (ρ_ X).inv := by |
rw [Iso.inv_comp_eq, F.right_unitality, Category.assoc, Category.assoc, ← F.toFunctor.map_comp,
Iso.hom_inv_id, F.toFunctor.map_id, comp_id]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.CompleteLattice
namespace Submodule
variable (S : Type*) {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Semiring S]
[Module S M] [Module R M] [SMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R M]
def restrictScalars (V : Submodule R M) : Submodule S M where
carrier := V
zero_mem' := V.zero_mem
smul_mem' c _ h := V.smul_of_tower_mem c h
add_mem' hx hy := V.add_mem hx hy
#align submodule.restrict_scalars Submodule.restrictScalars
@[simp]
theorem coe_restrictScalars (V : Submodule R M) : (V.restrictScalars S : Set M) = V :=
rfl
#align submodule.coe_restrict_scalars Submodule.coe_restrictScalars
@[simp]
theorem toAddSubmonoid_restrictScalars (V : Submodule R M) :
(V.restrictScalars S).toAddSubmonoid = V.toAddSubmonoid :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_mem (V : Submodule R M) (m : M) : m ∈ V.restrictScalars S ↔ m ∈ V :=
Iff.refl _
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_mem Submodule.restrictScalars_mem
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_self (V : Submodule R M) : V.restrictScalars R = V :=
SetLike.coe_injective rfl
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_self Submodule.restrictScalars_self
variable (R M)
theorem restrictScalars_injective :
Function.Injective (restrictScalars S : Submodule R M → Submodule S M) := fun _ _ h =>
ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 (SetLike.ext'_iff.1 h : _)
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_injective Submodule.restrictScalars_injective
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_inj {V₁ V₂ : Submodule R M} :
restrictScalars S V₁ = restrictScalars S V₂ ↔ V₁ = V₂ :=
(restrictScalars_injective S _ _).eq_iff
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_inj Submodule.restrictScalars_inj
instance restrictScalars.origModule (p : Submodule R M) : Module R (p.restrictScalars S) :=
(by infer_instance : Module R p)
#align submodule.restrict_scalars.orig_module Submodule.restrictScalars.origModule
instance restrictScalars.isScalarTower (p : Submodule R M) :
IsScalarTower S R (p.restrictScalars S) where
smul_assoc r s x := Subtype.ext <| smul_assoc r s (x : M)
#align submodule.restrict_scalars.is_scalar_tower Submodule.restrictScalars.isScalarTower
@[simps]
def restrictScalarsEmbedding : Submodule R M ↪o Submodule S M where
toFun := restrictScalars S
inj' := restrictScalars_injective S R M
map_rel_iff' := by simp [SetLike.le_def]
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_embedding Submodule.restrictScalarsEmbedding
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_embedding_apply Submodule.restrictScalarsEmbedding_apply
@[simps (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def restrictScalarsEquiv (p : Submodule R M) : p.restrictScalars S ≃ₗ[R] p :=
{ AddEquiv.refl p with
map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_equiv Submodule.restrictScalarsEquiv
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_equiv_symm_apply Submodule.restrictScalarsEquiv_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_bot : restrictScalars S (⊥ : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_bot Submodule.restrictScalars_bot
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_eq_bot_iff {p : Submodule R M} : restrictScalars S p = ⊥ ↔ p = ⊥ := by
simp [SetLike.ext_iff]
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_eq_bot_iff Submodule.restrictScalars_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem restrictScalars_top : restrictScalars S (⊤ : Submodule R M) = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align submodule.restrict_scalars_top Submodule.restrictScalars_top
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Submodule/RestrictScalars.lean | 116 | 117 | theorem restrictScalars_eq_top_iff {p : Submodule R M} : restrictScalars S p = ⊤ ↔ p = ⊤ := by |
simp [SetLike.ext_iff]
|
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.EisensteinSeries.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.UpperHalfPlane.Manifold
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.LocallyUniformLimit
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.FDeriv
noncomputable section
open ModularForm EisensteinSeries UpperHalfPlane Set Filter Function Complex Manifold
open scoped Topology BigOperators Nat Classical UpperHalfPlane
namespace EisensteinSeries
lemma div_linear_zpow_differentiableOn (k : ℤ) (a : Fin 2 → ℤ) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (fun z : ℂ => 1 / (a 0 * z + a 1) ^ k) {z : ℂ | 0 < z.im} := by
rcases ne_or_eq a 0 with ha | rfl
· apply DifferentiableOn.div (differentiableOn_const 1)
· apply DifferentiableOn.zpow
· fun_prop
· left
exact fun z hz ↦ linear_ne_zero _ ⟨z, hz⟩
((comp_ne_zero_iff _ Int.cast_injective Int.cast_zero).mpr ha)
· exact fun z hz ↦ zpow_ne_zero k (linear_ne_zero (a ·)
⟨z, hz⟩ ((comp_ne_zero_iff _ Int.cast_injective Int.cast_zero).mpr ha))
· simp only [ Fin.isValue, Pi.zero_apply, Int.cast_zero, zero_mul, add_zero, one_div]
apply differentiableOn_const
lemma eisSummand_extension_differentiableOn (k : ℤ) (a : Fin 2 → ℤ) :
DifferentiableOn ℂ (↑ₕeisSummand k a) {z : ℂ | 0 < z.im} := by
apply DifferentiableOn.congr (div_linear_zpow_differentiableOn k a)
intro z hz
lift z to ℍ using hz
apply comp_ofComplex
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/ModularForms/EisensteinSeries/MDifferentiable.lean | 54 | 65 | theorem eisensteinSeries_SIF_MDifferentiable {k : ℤ} {N : ℕ} (hk : 3 ≤ k) (a : Fin 2 → ZMod N) :
MDifferentiable 𝓘(ℂ) 𝓘(ℂ) (eisensteinSeries_SIF a k) := by |
intro τ
suffices DifferentiableAt ℂ (↑ₕeisensteinSeries_SIF a k) τ.1 by
convert MDifferentiableAt.comp τ (DifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableAt this) τ.mdifferentiable_coe
exact funext fun z ↦ (comp_ofComplex (eisensteinSeries_SIF a k) z).symm
refine DifferentiableOn.differentiableAt ?_
((isOpen_lt continuous_const Complex.continuous_im).mem_nhds τ.2)
exact (eisensteinSeries_tendstoLocallyUniformlyOn hk a).differentiableOn
(eventually_of_forall fun s ↦ DifferentiableOn.sum
fun _ _ ↦ eisSummand_extension_differentiableOn _ _)
(isOpen_lt continuous_const continuous_im)
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Orthogonal
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Symmetric
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.RCLike
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Decomposition
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0b7c740e25651db0ba63648fbae9f9d6f941e31b"
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open LinearMap (ker range)
open Topology
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
variable [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "absR" => abs
-- FIXME this monolithic proof causes a deterministic timeout with `-T50000`
-- It should be broken in a sequence of more manageable pieces,
-- perhaps with individual statements for the three steps below.
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex {K : Set F} (ne : K.Nonempty) (h₁ : IsComplete K)
(h₂ : Convex ℝ K) : ∀ u : F, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ := fun u => by
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
letI : Nonempty K := ne.to_subtype
have zero_le_δ : 0 ≤ δ := le_ciInf fun _ => norm_nonneg _
have δ_le : ∀ w : K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun _ => norm_nonneg _⟩
have δ_le' : ∀ w ∈ K, δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := fun w hw => δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
-- Step 1: since `δ` is the infimum, can find a sequence `w : ℕ → K` in `K`
-- such that `‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1)` (which implies `‖u - w n‖ --> δ`);
-- maybe this should be a separate lemma
have exists_seq : ∃ w : ℕ → K, ∀ n, ‖u - w n‖ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := by
have hδ : ∀ n : ℕ, δ < δ + 1 / (n + 1) := fun n =>
lt_add_of_le_of_pos le_rfl Nat.one_div_pos_of_nat
have h := fun n => exists_lt_of_ciInf_lt (hδ n)
let w : ℕ → K := fun n => Classical.choose (h n)
exact ⟨w, fun n => Classical.choose_spec (h n)⟩
rcases exists_seq with ⟨w, hw⟩
have norm_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
have h : Tendsto (fun _ : ℕ => δ) atTop (𝓝 δ) := tendsto_const_nhds
have h' : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => δ + 1 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 δ) := by
convert h.add tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
simp only [add_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le h h' (fun x => δ_le _) fun x => le_of_lt (hw _)
-- Step 2: Prove that the sequence `w : ℕ → K` is a Cauchy sequence
have seq_is_cauchy : CauchySeq fun n => (w n : F) := by
rw [cauchySeq_iff_le_tendsto_0]
-- splits into three goals
let b := fun n : ℕ => 8 * δ * (1 / (n + 1)) + 4 * (1 / (n + 1)) * (1 / (n + 1))
use fun n => √(b n)
constructor
-- first goal : `∀ (n : ℕ), 0 ≤ √(b n)`
· intro n
exact sqrt_nonneg _
constructor
-- second goal : `∀ (n m N : ℕ), N ≤ n → N ≤ m → dist ↑(w n) ↑(w m) ≤ √(b N)`
· intro p q N hp hq
let wp := (w p : F)
let wq := (w q : F)
let a := u - wq
let b := u - wp
let half := 1 / (2 : ℝ)
let div := 1 / ((N : ℝ) + 1)
have :
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) :=
calc
4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (2 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) + ‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ :=
by ring
_ =
absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * (absR (2 : ℝ) * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖) +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by
rw [_root_.abs_of_nonneg]
exact zero_le_two
_ =
‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ * ‖(2 : ℝ) • (u - half • (wq + wp))‖ +
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ := by simp [norm_smul]
_ = ‖a + b‖ * ‖a + b‖ + ‖a - b‖ * ‖a - b‖ := by
rw [smul_sub, smul_smul, mul_one_div_cancel (_root_.two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0), ←
one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul]
simp only [one_smul]
have eq₁ : wp - wq = a - b := (sub_sub_sub_cancel_left _ _ _).symm
have eq₂ : u + u - (wq + wp) = a + b := by
show u + u - (wq + wp) = u - wq + (u - wp)
abel
rw [eq₁, eq₂]
_ = 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) := parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ _ _
have eq : δ ≤ ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
rw [smul_add]
apply δ_le'
apply h₂
repeat' exact Subtype.mem _
repeat' exact le_of_lt one_half_pos
exact add_halves 1
have eq₁ : 4 * δ * δ ≤ 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc]
gcongr
have eq₂ : ‖a‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw q) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hq) _)
have eq₂' : ‖b‖ ≤ δ + div :=
le_trans (le_of_lt <| hw p) (add_le_add_left (Nat.one_div_le_one_div hp) _)
rw [dist_eq_norm]
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq
· exact sqrt_nonneg _
rw [mul_self_sqrt]
· calc
‖wp - wq‖ * ‖wp - wq‖ =
2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ * ‖u - half • (wq + wp)‖ := by
simp [← this]
_ ≤ 2 * (‖a‖ * ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ * ‖b‖) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ ≤ 2 * ((δ + div) * (δ + div) + (δ + div) * (δ + div)) - 4 * δ * δ := by gcongr
_ = 8 * δ * div + 4 * div * div := by ring
positivity
-- third goal : `Tendsto (fun (n : ℕ) => √(b n)) atTop (𝓝 0)`
suffices Tendsto (fun x ↦ √(8 * δ * x + 4 * x * x) : ℝ → ℝ) (𝓝 0) (𝓝 0)
from this.comp tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
exact Continuous.tendsto' (by continuity) _ _ (by simp)
-- Step 3: By completeness of `K`, let `w : ℕ → K` converge to some `v : K`.
-- Prove that it satisfies all requirements.
rcases cauchySeq_tendsto_of_isComplete h₁ (fun n => Subtype.mem _) seq_is_cauchy with
⟨v, hv, w_tendsto⟩
use v
use hv
have h_cont : Continuous fun v => ‖u - v‖ :=
Continuous.comp continuous_norm (Continuous.sub continuous_const continuous_id)
have : Tendsto (fun n => ‖u - w n‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖u - v‖) := by
convert Tendsto.comp h_cont.continuousAt w_tendsto
exact tendsto_nhds_unique this norm_tendsto
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_convex exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero {K : Set F} (h : Convex ℝ K) {u : F} {v : F}
(hv : v ∈ K) : (‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
letI : Nonempty K := ⟨⟨v, hv⟩⟩
constructor
· intro eq w hw
let δ := ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖
let p := ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ
let q := ‖w - v‖ ^ 2
have δ_le (w : K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := ciInf_le ⟨0, fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h ▸ norm_nonneg _⟩ _
have δ_le' (w) (hw : w ∈ K) : δ ≤ ‖u - w‖ := δ_le ⟨w, hw⟩
have (θ : ℝ) (hθ₁ : 0 < θ) (hθ₂ : θ ≤ 1) : 2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
have : ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 :=
calc ‖u - v‖ ^ 2
_ ≤ ‖u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v)‖ ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq]; apply mul_self_le_mul_self (norm_nonneg _)
rw [eq]; apply δ_le'
apply h hw hv
exacts [le_of_lt hθ₁, sub_nonneg.2 hθ₂, add_sub_cancel _ _]
_ = ‖u - v - θ • (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := by
have : u - (θ • w + (1 - θ) • v) = u - v - θ • (w - v) := by
rw [smul_sub, sub_smul, one_smul]
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc, neg_add_rev]
rw [this]
_ = ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_sq ℝ, inner_smul_right, norm_smul]
simp only [sq]
show
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * (θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) +
absR θ * ‖w - v‖ * (absR θ * ‖w - v‖) =
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * (‖w - v‖ * ‖w - v‖)
rw [abs_of_pos hθ₁]; ring
have eq₁ :
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) + θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 =
‖u - v‖ ^ 2 + (θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by
abel
rw [eq₁, le_add_iff_nonneg_right] at this
have eq₂ :
θ * θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * θ * inner (u - v) (w - v) =
θ * (θ * ‖w - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) (w - v)) := by ring
rw [eq₂] at this
have := le_of_sub_nonneg (nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right this hθ₁)
exact this
by_cases hq : q = 0
· rw [hq] at this
have : p ≤ 0 := by
have := this (1 : ℝ) (by norm_num) (by norm_num)
linarith
exact this
· have q_pos : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_ne (sq_nonneg _) fun h ↦ hq h.symm
by_contra hp
rw [not_le] at hp
let θ := min (1 : ℝ) (p / q)
have eq₁ : θ * q ≤ p :=
calc
θ * q ≤ p / q * q := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (min_le_right _ _) (sq_nonneg _)
_ = p := div_mul_cancel₀ _ hq
have : 2 * p ≤ p :=
calc
2 * p ≤ θ * q := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
exact this θ (lt_min (by norm_num) (div_pos hp q_pos)) (by norm_num [θ])
_ ≤ p := eq₁
linarith
· intro h
apply le_antisymm
· apply le_ciInf
intro w
apply nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (norm_nonneg _)
have := h w w.2
calc
‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ ≤ ‖u - v‖ * ‖u - v‖ - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) := by linarith
_ ≤ ‖u - v‖ ^ 2 - 2 * inner (u - v) ((w : F) - v) + ‖(w : F) - v‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sq]
refine le_add_of_nonneg_right ?_
exact sq_nonneg _
_ = ‖u - v - (w - v)‖ ^ 2 := (@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _).symm
_ = ‖u - w‖ * ‖u - w‖ := by
have : u - v - (w - v) = u - w := by abel
rw [this, sq]
· show ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖ ≤ (fun w : K => ‖u - w‖) ⟨v, hv⟩
apply ciInf_le
use 0
rintro y ⟨z, rfl⟩
exact norm_nonneg _
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_le_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero
variable (K : Submodule 𝕜 E)
theorem exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace (h : IsComplete (↑K : Set E)) :
∀ u : E, ∃ v ∈ K, ‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (K : Set E), ‖u - w‖ := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := Submodule.restrictScalars ℝ K
exact exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_convex ⟨0, K'.zero_mem⟩ h K'.convex
#align exists_norm_eq_infi_of_complete_subspace exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (K : Submodule ℝ F) {u : F} {v : F} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : (↑K : Set F), ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 :=
Iff.intro
(by
intro h
have h : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero] at h
exacts [K.convex, hv]
intro w hw
have le : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
let w' := w + v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
have h₂ : w' - v = w := by
simp only [w', add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂] at h₁
exact h₁
have ge : ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ ≥ 0 := by
let w'' := -w + v
have : w'' ∈ K := Submodule.add_mem _ (Submodule.neg_mem _ hw) hv
have h₁ := h w'' this
have h₂ : w'' - v = -w := by
simp only [w'', neg_inj, add_neg_cancel_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [h₂, inner_neg_right] at h₁
linarith
exact le_antisymm le ge)
(by
intro h
have : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w - v⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 := by
intro w hw
let w' := w - v
have : w' ∈ K := Submodule.sub_mem _ hw hv
have h₁ := h w' this
exact le_of_eq h₁
rwa [norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_le_zero]
exacts [Submodule.convex _, hv])
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
theorem norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero {u : E} {v : E} (hv : v ∈ K) :
(‖u - v‖ = ⨅ w : K, ‖u - w‖) ↔ ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := by
letI : InnerProductSpace ℝ E := InnerProductSpace.rclikeToReal 𝕜 E
letI : Module ℝ E := RestrictScalars.module ℝ 𝕜 E
let K' : Submodule ℝ E := K.restrictScalars ℝ
constructor
· intro H
have A : ∀ w ∈ K, re ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0 := (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).1 H
intro w hw
apply ext
· simp [A w hw]
· symm
calc
im (0 : 𝕜) = 0 := im.map_zero
_ = re ⟪u - v, (-I : 𝕜) • w⟫ := (A _ (K.smul_mem (-I) hw)).symm
_ = re (-I * ⟪u - v, w⟫) := by rw [inner_smul_right]
_ = im ⟪u - v, w⟫ := by simp
· intro H
have : ∀ w ∈ K', ⟪u - v, w⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [real_inner_eq_re_inner, H w hw]
exact zero_re'
exact (norm_eq_iInf_iff_real_inner_eq_zero K' hv).2 this
#align norm_eq_infi_iff_inner_eq_zero norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero
class HasOrthogonalProjection (K : Submodule 𝕜 E) : Prop where
exists_orthogonal (v : E) : ∃ w ∈ K, v - w ∈ Kᗮ
instance (priority := 100) HasOrthogonalProjection.ofCompleteSpace [CompleteSpace K] :
HasOrthogonalProjection K where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases exists_norm_eq_iInf_of_complete_subspace K (completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete.mp ‹_›) v
with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨w, hwK, (K.mem_orthogonal' _).2 ?_⟩
rwa [← norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero K hwK]
instance [HasOrthogonalProjection K] : HasOrthogonalProjection Kᗮ where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨_, hw, ?_⟩
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
exact K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal hwK
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map (f.toLinearEquiv : E →ₗ[𝕜] E')) where
exists_orthogonal v := by
rcases HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) (f.symm v) with ⟨w, hwK, hw⟩
refine ⟨f w, Submodule.mem_map_of_mem hwK, Set.forall_mem_image.2 fun u hu ↦ ?_⟩
erw [← f.symm.inner_map_map, f.symm_apply_apply, map_sub, f.symm_apply_apply, hw u hu]
instance HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv' [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
HasOrthogonalProjection (K.map f.toLinearIsometry) :=
HasOrthogonalProjection.map_linearIsometryEquiv K f
instance : HasOrthogonalProjection (⊤ : Submodule 𝕜 E) := ⟨fun v ↦ ⟨v, trivial, by simp⟩⟩
section orthogonalProjection
variable [HasOrthogonalProjection K]
def orthogonalProjectionFn (v : E) :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose
#align orthogonal_projection_fn orthogonalProjectionFn
variable {K}
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem (v : E) : orthogonalProjectionFn K v ∈ K :=
(HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.left
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_mem orthogonalProjectionFn_mem
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
(K.mem_orthogonal' _).1 (HasOrthogonalProjection.exists_orthogonal (K := K) v).choose_spec.right
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero
theorem eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : orthogonalProjectionFn K u = v := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜]
have hvs : orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v ∈ K :=
Submodule.sub_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem u) hvm
have huo : ⟪u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero u _ hvs
have huv : ⟪u - v, orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := hvo _ hvs
have houv : ⟪u - v - (u - orthogonalProjectionFn K u), orthogonalProjectionFn K u - v⟫ = 0 := by
rw [inner_sub_left, huo, huv, sub_zero]
rwa [sub_sub_sub_cancel_left] at houv
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_fn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
variable (K)
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq (v : E) :
‖v‖ * ‖v‖ =
‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖v - orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ +
‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ * ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K v‖ := by
set p := orthogonalProjectionFn K v
have h' : ⟪v - p, p⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v)
convert norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (v - p) p h' using 2 <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_norm_sq orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq
def orthogonalProjection : E →L[𝕜] K :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun v => ⟨orthogonalProjectionFn K v, orthogonalProjectionFn_mem v⟩
map_add' := fun x y => by
have hm : orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y ∈ K :=
Submodule.add_mem K (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x) (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem y)
have ho :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪x + y - (orthogonalProjectionFn K x + orthogonalProjectionFn K y), w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [add_sub_add_comm, inner_add_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw, add_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
have hm : c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_mem K _ (orthogonalProjectionFn_mem x)
have ho : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪c • x - c • orthogonalProjectionFn K x, w⟫ = 0 := by
intro w hw
rw [← smul_sub, inner_smul_left, orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero _ w hw,
mul_zero]
ext
simp [eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hm ho] }
1 fun x => by
simp only [one_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk]
refine le_of_pow_le_pow_left two_ne_zero (norm_nonneg _) ?_
change ‖orthogonalProjectionFn K x‖ ^ 2 ≤ ‖x‖ ^ 2
nlinarith [orthogonalProjectionFn_norm_sq K x]
#align orthogonal_projection orthogonalProjection
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjectionFn_eq (v : E) :
orthogonalProjectionFn K v = (orthogonalProjection K v : E) :=
rfl
#align orthogonal_projection_fn_eq orthogonalProjectionFn_eq
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero (v : E) :
∀ w ∈ K, ⟪v - orthogonalProjection K v, w⟫ = 0 :=
orthogonalProjectionFn_inner_eq_zero v
#align orthogonal_projection_inner_eq_zero orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (v : E) : v - orthogonalProjection K v ∈ Kᗮ := by
intro w hw
rw [inner_eq_zero_symm]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _ _ hw
#align sub_orthogonal_projection_mem_orthogonal sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero {u v : E} (hvm : v ∈ K)
(hvo : ∀ w ∈ K, ⟪u - v, w⟫ = 0) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hvm hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal {u v : E} (hv : v ∈ K)
(hvo : u - v ∈ Kᗮ) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjectionFn_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero hv <| (Submodule.mem_orthogonal' _ _).1 hvo
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' {u v z : E}
(hv : v ∈ K) (hz : z ∈ Kᗮ) (hu : u = v + z) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = v :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal hv (by simpa [hu] )
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_mem_orthogonal' eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal'
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val (u : E) :
(orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u : E) = u - orthogonalProjection K u :=
eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal' (sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _)
(K.le_orthogonal_orthogonal (orthogonalProjection K u).2) <| by simp
theorem orthogonalProjection_orthogonal (u : E) :
orthogonalProjection Kᗮ u =
⟨u - orthogonalProjection K u, sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal _⟩ :=
Subtype.eq <| orthogonalProjection_orthogonal_val _
theorem orthogonalProjection_minimal {U : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection U] (y : E) :
‖y - orthogonalProjection U y‖ = ⨅ x : U, ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_iInf_iff_inner_eq_zero _ (Submodule.coe_mem _)]
exact orthogonalProjection_inner_eq_zero _
#align orthogonal_projection_minimal orthogonalProjection_minimal
theorem eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule {K' : Submodule 𝕜 E} [HasOrthogonalProjection K']
(h : K = K') (u : E) : (orthogonalProjection K u : E) = (orthogonalProjection K' u : E) := by
subst h; rfl
#align eq_orthogonal_projection_of_eq_submodule eq_orthogonalProjection_of_eq_submodule
@[simp]
theorem orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self (v : K) : orthogonalProjection K v = v := by
ext
apply eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero <;> simp
#align orthogonal_projection_mem_subspace_eq_self orthogonalProjection_mem_subspace_eq_self
theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff {v : E} : (orthogonalProjection K v : E) = v ↔ v ∈ K := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_of_inner_eq_zero h ?_⟩
· rw [← h]
simp
· simp
#align orthogonal_projection_eq_self_iff orthogonalProjection_eq_self_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Projection.lean | 565 | 569 | theorem orthogonalProjection_eq_zero_iff {v : E} : orthogonalProjection K v = 0 ↔ v ∈ Kᗮ := by |
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ Subtype.eq <| eq_orthogonalProjection_of_mem_orthogonal
(zero_mem _) ?_⟩
· simpa [h] using sub_orthogonalProjection_mem_orthogonal (K := K) v
· simpa
|
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Exponent
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Transfer
#align_import group_theory.schreier from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8350c34a64b9bc3fc64335df8006bffcadc7baa6"
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open MemRightTransversals
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {H : Subgroup G} {R S : Set G}
theorem closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top
(hR : R ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G)) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R) (hS : closure S = ⊤) :
(closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (toFun hR g : G)⁻¹)) * R = ⊤ := by
let f : G → R := fun g => toFun hR g
let U : Set G := (R * S).image fun g => g * (f g : G)⁻¹
change (closure U : Set G) * R = ⊤
refine top_le_iff.mp fun g _ => ?_
refine closure_induction_right ?_ ?_ ?_ (eq_top_iff.mp hS (mem_top g))
· exact ⟨1, (closure U).one_mem, 1, hR1, one_mul 1⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s = u * (r * s * (f (r * s) : G)⁻¹) * f (r * s) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ?_) (f (r * s)).coe_prop
exact subset_closure ⟨r * s, Set.mul_mem_mul hr hs, rfl⟩
· rintro - - s hs ⟨u, hu, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [show u * r * s⁻¹ = u * (f (r * s⁻¹) * s * r⁻¹)⁻¹ * f (r * s⁻¹) by group]
refine Set.mul_mem_mul ((closure U).mul_mem hu ((closure U).inv_mem ?_)) (f (r * s⁻¹)).2
refine subset_closure ⟨f (r * s⁻¹) * s, Set.mul_mem_mul (f (r * s⁻¹)).2 hs, ?_⟩
rw [mul_right_inj, inv_inj, ← Subtype.coe_mk r hr, ← Subtype.ext_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
apply (mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR (f (r * s⁻¹) * s)).unique
(mul_inv_toFun_mem hR (f (r * s⁻¹) * s))
rw [mul_assoc, ← inv_inv s, ← mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
exact toFun_mul_inv_mem hR (r * s⁻¹)
#align subgroup.closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top Subgroup.closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top
theorem closure_mul_image_eq (hR : R ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G)) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (toFun hR g : G)⁻¹) = H := by
have hU : closure ((R * S).image fun g => g * (toFun hR g : G)⁻¹) ≤ H := by
rw [closure_le]
rintro - ⟨g, -, rfl⟩
exact mul_inv_toFun_mem hR g
refine le_antisymm hU fun h hh => ?_
obtain ⟨g, hg, r, hr, rfl⟩ :=
show h ∈ _ from eq_top_iff.mp (closure_mul_image_mul_eq_top hR hR1 hS) (mem_top h)
suffices (⟨r, hr⟩ : R) = (⟨1, hR1⟩ : R) by
simpa only [show r = 1 from Subtype.ext_iff.mp this, mul_one]
apply (mem_rightTransversals_iff_existsUnique_mul_inv_mem.mp hR r).unique
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, mul_inv_self]
exact H.one_mem
· rw [Subtype.coe_mk, inv_one, mul_one]
exact (H.mul_mem_cancel_left (hU hg)).mp hh
#align subgroup.closure_mul_image_eq Subgroup.closure_mul_image_eq
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Schreier.lean | 85 | 89 | theorem closure_mul_image_eq_top (hR : R ∈ rightTransversals (H : Set G)) (hR1 : (1 : G) ∈ R)
(hS : closure S = ⊤) : closure ((R * S).image fun g =>
⟨g * (toFun hR g : G)⁻¹, mul_inv_toFun_mem hR g⟩ : Set H) = ⊤ := by |
rw [eq_top_iff, ← map_subtype_le_map_subtype, MonoidHom.map_closure, Set.image_image]
exact (map_subtype_le ⊤).trans (ge_of_eq (closure_mul_image_eq hR hR1 hS))
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.Besicovitch
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import measure_theory.covering.besicovitch_vector_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
universe u
open Metric Set FiniteDimensional MeasureTheory Filter Fin
open scoped ENNReal Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Besicovitch
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
def multiplicity (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E] :=
sSup {N | ∃ s : Finset E, s.card = N ∧ (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) ∧ ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖}
#align besicovitch.multiplicity Besicovitch.multiplicity
section
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
theorem card_le_of_separated (s : Finset E) (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
borelize E
let μ : Measure E := Measure.addHaar
let δ : ℝ := (1 : ℝ) / 2
let ρ : ℝ := (5 : ℝ) / 2
have ρpos : 0 < ρ := by norm_num
set A := ⋃ c ∈ s, ball (c : E) δ with hA
have D : Set.Pairwise (s : Set E) (Disjoint on fun c => ball (c : E) δ) := by
rintro c hc d hd hcd
apply ball_disjoint_ball
rw [dist_eq_norm]
convert h c hc d hd hcd
norm_num
have A_subset : A ⊆ ball (0 : E) ρ := by
refine iUnion₂_subset fun x hx => ?_
apply ball_subset_ball'
calc
δ + dist x 0 ≤ δ + 2 := by rw [dist_zero_right]; exact add_le_add le_rfl (hs x hx)
_ = 5 / 2 := by norm_num
have I :
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) ≤
ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) :=
calc
(s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) = μ A := by
rw [hA, measure_biUnion_finset D fun c _ => measurableSet_ball]
have I : 0 < δ := by norm_num
simp only [div_pow, μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ I]
simp only [one_div, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
_ ≤ μ (ball (0 : E) ρ) := measure_mono A_subset
_ = ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) * μ (ball 0 1) := by
simp only [μ.addHaar_ball_of_pos _ ρpos]
have J : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) * ENNReal.ofReal (δ ^ finrank ℝ E) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ρ ^ finrank ℝ E) :=
(ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right (measure_ball_pos _ _ zero_lt_one).ne' measure_ball_lt_top.ne).1 I
have K : (s.card : ℝ) ≤ (5 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℝ E := by
have := ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (pow_nonneg ρpos.le _) J
simpa [ρ, δ, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pow] using this
exact mod_cast K
#align besicovitch.card_le_of_separated Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated
theorem multiplicity_le : multiplicity E ≤ 5 ^ finrank ℝ E := by
apply csSup_le
· refine ⟨0, ⟨∅, by simp⟩⟩
· rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
#align besicovitch.multiplicity_le Besicovitch.multiplicity_le
theorem card_le_multiplicity {s : Finset E} (hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2)
(h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖) : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by
apply le_csSup
· refine ⟨5 ^ finrank ℝ E, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨s, ⟨rfl, h⟩⟩
exact Besicovitch.card_le_of_separated s h.1 h.2
· simp only [mem_setOf_eq, Ne]
exact ⟨s, rfl, hs, h's⟩
#align besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity Besicovitch.card_le_multiplicity
variable (E)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/BesicovitchVectorSpace.lean | 174 | 246 | theorem exists_goodδ :
∃ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ ∧ δ < 1 ∧ ∀ s : Finset E, (∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2) →
(∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 - δ ≤ ‖c - d‖) → s.card ≤ multiplicity E := by |
classical
/- This follows from a compactness argument: otherwise, one could extract a converging
subsequence, to obtain a `1`-separated set in the ball of radius `2` with cardinality
`N = multiplicity E + 1`. To formalize this, we work with functions `Fin N → E`.
-/
by_contra! h
set N := multiplicity E + 1 with hN
have :
∀ δ : ℝ, 0 < δ → ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧
Pairwise fun i j => 1 - δ ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
intro δ hδ
rcases lt_or_le δ 1 with (hδ' | hδ')
· rcases h δ hδ hδ' with ⟨s, hs, h's, s_card⟩
obtain ⟨f, f_inj, hfs⟩ : ∃ f : Fin N → E, Function.Injective f ∧ range f ⊆ ↑s := by
have : Fintype.card (Fin N) ≤ s.card := by simp only [Fintype.card_fin]; exact s_card
rcases Function.Embedding.exists_of_card_le_finset this with ⟨f, hf⟩
exact ⟨f, f.injective, hf⟩
simp only [range_subset_iff, Finset.mem_coe] at hfs
exact ⟨f, fun i => hs _ (hfs i), fun i j hij => h's _ (hfs i) _ (hfs j) (f_inj.ne hij)⟩
· exact
⟨fun _ => 0, by simp, fun i j _ => by
simpa only [norm_zero, sub_nonpos, sub_self]⟩
-- For `δ > 0`, `F δ` is a function from `fin N` to the ball of radius `2` for which two points
-- in the image are separated by `1 - δ`.
choose! F hF using this
-- Choose a converging subsequence when `δ → 0`.
have : ∃ f : Fin N → E, (∀ i : Fin N, ‖f i‖ ≤ 2) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := by
obtain ⟨u, _, zero_lt_u, hu⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ,
(∀ m n : ℕ, m < n → u n < u m) ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ)
have A : ∀ n, F (u n) ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2 := by
intro n
simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right,
(hF (u n) (zero_lt_u n)).left, forall_const]
obtain ⟨f, fmem, φ, φ_mono, hf⟩ :
∃ f ∈ closedBall (0 : Fin N → E) 2,
∃ φ : ℕ → ℕ, StrictMono φ ∧ Tendsto ((F ∘ u) ∘ φ) atTop (𝓝 f) :=
IsCompact.tendsto_subseq (isCompact_closedBall _ _) A
refine ⟨f, fun i => ?_, fun i j hij => ?_⟩
· simp only [pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg zero_le_two, mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right] at fmem
exact fmem i
· have A : Tendsto (fun n => ‖F (u (φ n)) i - F (u (φ n)) j‖) atTop (𝓝 ‖f i - f j‖) :=
((hf.apply_nhds i).sub (hf.apply_nhds j)).norm
have B : Tendsto (fun n => 1 - u (φ n)) atTop (𝓝 (1 - 0)) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.sub (hu.comp φ_mono.tendsto_atTop)
rw [sub_zero] at B
exact le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' B A fun n => (hF (u (φ n)) (zero_lt_u _)).2 hij
rcases this with ⟨f, hf, h'f⟩
-- the range of `f` contradicts the definition of `multiplicity E`.
have finj : Function.Injective f := by
intro i j hij
by_contra h
have : 1 ≤ ‖f i - f j‖ := h'f h
simp only [hij, norm_zero, sub_self] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ (this.trans_lt zero_lt_one)
let s := Finset.image f Finset.univ
have s_card : s.card = N := by rw [Finset.card_image_of_injective _ finj]; exact Finset.card_fin N
have hs : ∀ c ∈ s, ‖c‖ ≤ 2 := by
simp only [s, hf, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_const, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ,
Finset.mem_image, true_and]
have h's : ∀ c ∈ s, ∀ d ∈ s, c ≠ d → 1 ≤ ‖c - d‖ := by
simp only [s, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_exists_index, Finset.mem_univ, Finset.mem_image,
Ne, exists_true_left, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff, forall_true_left, true_and]
intro i j hij
have : i ≠ j := fun h => by rw [h] at hij; exact hij rfl
exact h'f this
have : s.card ≤ multiplicity E := card_le_multiplicity hs h's
rw [s_card, hN] at this
exact lt_irrefl _ ((Nat.lt_succ_self (multiplicity E)).trans_le this)
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
#align_import category_theory.limits.fubini from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59382264386afdbaf1727e617f5fdda511992eb9"
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [SmallCategory K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
structure DiagramOfCones where
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones
structure DiagramOfCocones where
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.conePoints
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurry
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp;
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones_inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramOfConesInhabited
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits_cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints
variable [HasLimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasLimit (F ⋙ lim)]
noncomputable def limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) := by
let c := limit.cone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsLimit c := limit.isLimit _
let G := DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (G.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
have Q' := coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit Q P
have Q'' := limit.isLimit (F ⋙ lim)
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
dsimp [limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso, IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 296 | 300 | theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by |
rw [← cancel_epi (limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom]
simp
|
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Cones
#align_import category_theory.limits.is_limit from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"740acc0e6f9adf4423f92a485d0456fc271482da"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Functor Opposite
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
-- declare the `v`'s first; see `CategoryTheory.Category` for an explanation
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄ u₁ u₂ u₃ u₄
variable {J : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} J] {K : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} K]
variable {C : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} C]
variable {F : J ⥤ C}
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure IsLimit (t : Cone F) where
lift : ∀ s : Cone F, s.pt ⟶ t.pt
fac : ∀ (s : Cone F) (j : J), lift s ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j := by aesop_cat
uniq : ∀ (s : Cone F) (m : s.pt ⟶ t.pt) (_ : ∀ j : J, m ≫ t.π.app j = s.π.app j), m = lift s := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.fac' CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.fac
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.uniq' CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.uniq
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this. Linter complains it still exists
attribute [-simp, nolint simpNF] IsLimit.mk.injEq
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] IsLimit.fac
namespace IsLimit
instance subsingleton {t : Cone F} : Subsingleton (IsLimit t) :=
⟨by intro P Q; cases P; cases Q; congr; aesop_cat⟩
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.subsingleton CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.subsingleton
def map {F G : J ⥤ C} (s : Cone F) {t : Cone G} (P : IsLimit t) (α : F ⟶ G) : s.pt ⟶ t.pt :=
P.lift ((Cones.postcompose α).obj s)
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.map CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.map
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem map_π {F G : J ⥤ C} (c : Cone F) {d : Cone G} (hd : IsLimit d) (α : F ⟶ G) (j : J) :
hd.map c α ≫ d.π.app j = c.π.app j ≫ α.app j :=
fac _ _ _
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.map_π CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.map_π
@[simp]
theorem lift_self {c : Cone F} (t : IsLimit c) : t.lift c = 𝟙 c.pt :=
(t.uniq _ _ fun _ => id_comp _).symm
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_self CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.lift_self
-- Repackaging the definition in terms of cone morphisms.
@[simps]
def liftConeMorphism {t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) (s : Cone F) : s ⟶ t where hom := h.lift s
#align category_theory.limits.is_limit.lift_cone_morphism CategoryTheory.Limits.IsLimit.liftConeMorphism
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/IsLimit.lean | 101 | 104 | theorem uniq_cone_morphism {s t : Cone F} (h : IsLimit t) {f f' : s ⟶ t} : f = f' :=
have : ∀ {g : s ⟶ t}, g = h.liftConeMorphism s := by |
intro g; apply ConeMorphism.ext; exact h.uniq _ _ g.w
this.trans this.symm
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.FieldDivision
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FinitePresentation
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FiniteType
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerBasis
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotientNoetherian
#align_import ring_theory.adjoin_root from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5c4b3d41a84bd2a1d79c7d9265e58a891e71be89"
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Polynomial
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {K : Type w}
open Polynomial Ideal
def AdjoinRoot [CommRing R] (f : R[X]) : Type u :=
Polynomial R ⧸ (span {f} : Ideal R[X])
#align adjoin_root AdjoinRoot
namespace AdjoinRoot
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] (f : R[X])
instance instCommRing : CommRing (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.commRing _
#align adjoin_root.comm_ring AdjoinRoot.instCommRing
instance : Inhabited (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : DecidableEq (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Classical.decEq _
protected theorem nontrivial [IsDomain R] (h : degree f ≠ 0) : Nontrivial (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.nontrivial
(by
simp_rw [Ne, span_singleton_eq_top, Polynomial.isUnit_iff, not_exists, not_and]
rintro x hx rfl
exact h (degree_C hx.ne_zero))
#align adjoin_root.nontrivial AdjoinRoot.nontrivial
def mk : R[X] →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
Ideal.Quotient.mk _
#align adjoin_root.mk AdjoinRoot.mk
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : AdjoinRoot f → Prop} (x : AdjoinRoot f) (ih : ∀ p : R[X], C (mk f p)) :
C x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' x ih
#align adjoin_root.induction_on AdjoinRoot.induction_on
def of : R →+* AdjoinRoot f :=
(mk f).comp C
#align adjoin_root.of AdjoinRoot.of
instance instSMulAdjoinRoot [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : SMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.instSMul' _
instance [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] : DistribSMul S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribSMul' _
@[simp]
theorem smul_mk [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R[X]) :
a • mk f x = mk f (a • x) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.smul_mk AdjoinRoot.smul_mk
theorem smul_of [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (a : S) (x : R) :
a • of f x = of f (a • x) := by rw [of, RingHom.comp_apply, RingHom.comp_apply, smul_mk, smul_C]
#align adjoin_root.smul_of AdjoinRoot.smul_of
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [SMul R₁ R₂] [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance (R₁ R₂ : Type*) [DistribSMul R₁ R] [DistribSMul R₂ R] [IsScalarTower R₁ R R]
[IsScalarTower R₂ R R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] (f : R[X]) :
SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.smulCommClass _ _
instance isScalarTower_right [DistribSMul S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] :
IsScalarTower S (AdjoinRoot f) (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
#align adjoin_root.is_scalar_tower_right AdjoinRoot.isScalarTower_right
instance [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (f : R[X]) :
DistribMulAction S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Submodule.Quotient.distribMulAction' _
instance [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] : Algebra S (AdjoinRoot f) :=
Ideal.Quotient.algebra S
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (AdjoinRoot f) = of f :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq
variable (S)
theorem algebraMap_eq' [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] :
algebraMap S (AdjoinRoot f) = (of f).comp (algebraMap S R) :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.algebra_map_eq' AdjoinRoot.algebraMap_eq'
variable {S}
theorem finiteType : Algebra.FiniteType R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FiniteType.polynomial R).of_surjective _ (Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ_surjective R _)
#align adjoin_root.finite_type AdjoinRoot.finiteType
theorem finitePresentation : Algebra.FinitePresentation R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
(Algebra.FinitePresentation.polynomial R).quotient (Submodule.fg_span_singleton f)
#align adjoin_root.finite_presentation AdjoinRoot.finitePresentation
def root : AdjoinRoot f :=
mk f X
#align adjoin_root.root AdjoinRoot.root
variable {f}
instance hasCoeT : CoeTC R (AdjoinRoot f) :=
⟨of f⟩
#align adjoin_root.has_coe_t AdjoinRoot.hasCoeT
@[ext]
theorem algHom_ext [Semiring S] [Algebra R S] {g₁ g₂ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S}
(h : g₁ (root f) = g₂ (root f)) : g₁ = g₂ :=
Ideal.Quotient.algHom_ext R <| Polynomial.algHom_ext h
#align adjoin_root.alg_hom_ext AdjoinRoot.algHom_ext
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk {g h : R[X]} : mk f g = mk f h ↔ f ∣ g - h :=
Ideal.Quotient.eq.trans Ideal.mem_span_singleton
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_mk AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero {g : R[X]} : mk f g = 0 ↔ f ∣ g :=
mk_eq_mk.trans <| by rw [sub_zero]
#align adjoin_root.mk_eq_zero AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mk_self : mk f f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mpr (mem_span_singleton.2 <| by simp)
#align adjoin_root.mk_self AdjoinRoot.mk_self
@[simp]
theorem mk_C (x : R) : mk f (C x) = x :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_C AdjoinRoot.mk_C
@[simp]
theorem mk_X : mk f X = root f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align adjoin_root.mk_X AdjoinRoot.mk_X
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0) (hd : degree g < degree f) :
mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_degree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_degree_lt
theorem mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt (hf : Monic f) {g : R[X]} (h0 : g ≠ 0)
(hd : natDegree g < natDegree f) : mk f g ≠ 0 :=
mk_eq_zero.not.2 <| hf.not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt h0 hd
#align adjoin_root.mk_ne_zero_of_nat_degree_lt AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq (p : R[X]) : aeval (root f) p = mk f p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p
(fun x => by
rw [aeval_C]
rfl)
(fun p q ihp ihq => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, RingHom.map_add, ihp, ihq]) fun n x _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, aeval_C, AlgHom.map_pow, aeval_X, RingHom.map_mul, mk_C, RingHom.map_pow,
mk_X]
rfl
#align adjoin_root.aeval_eq AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq
-- Porting note: the following proof was partly in term-mode, but I was not able to fix it.
theorem adjoinRoot_eq_top : Algebra.adjoin R ({root f} : Set (AdjoinRoot f)) = ⊤ := by
refine Algebra.eq_top_iff.2 fun x => ?_
induction x using AdjoinRoot.induction_on with
| ih p => exact (Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval R (root f)).symm ▸ ⟨p, aeval_eq p⟩
#align adjoin_root.adjoin_root_eq_top AdjoinRoot.adjoinRoot_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem eval₂_root (f : R[X]) : f.eval₂ (of f) (root f) = 0 := by
rw [← algebraMap_eq, ← aeval_def, aeval_eq, mk_self]
#align adjoin_root.eval₂_root AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root
theorem isRoot_root (f : R[X]) : IsRoot (f.map (of f)) (root f) := by
rw [IsRoot, eval_map, eval₂_root]
#align adjoin_root.is_root_root AdjoinRoot.isRoot_root
theorem isAlgebraic_root (hf : f ≠ 0) : IsAlgebraic R (root f) :=
⟨f, hf, eval₂_root f⟩
#align adjoin_root.is_algebraic_root AdjoinRoot.isAlgebraic_root
theorem of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero [IsDomain R] (hf : f.degree ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (AdjoinRoot.of f) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro p hp
rw [AdjoinRoot.of, RingHom.comp_apply, AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_zero] at hp
by_cases h : f = 0
· exact C_eq_zero.mp (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd (by rwa [h] at hp))
· contrapose! hf with h_contra
rw [← degree_C h_contra]
apply le_antisymm (degree_le_of_dvd hp (by rwa [Ne, C_eq_zero])) _
rwa [degree_C h_contra, zero_le_degree_iff]
#align adjoin_root.of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero AdjoinRoot.of.injective_of_degree_ne_zero
variable [CommRing S]
def lift (i : R →+* S) (x : S) (h : f.eval₂ i x = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →+* S := by
apply Ideal.Quotient.lift _ (eval₂RingHom i x)
intro g H
rcases mem_span_singleton.1 H with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [hy, RingHom.map_mul, coe_eval₂RingHom, h, zero_mul]
#align adjoin_root.lift AdjoinRoot.lift
variable {i : R →+* S} {a : S} (h : f.eval₂ i a = 0)
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk (g : R[X]) : lift i a h (mk f g) = g.eval₂ i a :=
Ideal.Quotient.lift_mk _ _ _
#align adjoin_root.lift_mk AdjoinRoot.lift_mk
@[simp]
theorem lift_root : lift i a h (root f) = a := by rw [root, lift_mk, eval₂_X]
#align adjoin_root.lift_root AdjoinRoot.lift_root
@[simp]
theorem lift_of {x : R} : lift i a h x = i x := by rw [← mk_C x, lift_mk, eval₂_C]
#align adjoin_root.lift_of AdjoinRoot.lift_of
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_of : (lift i a h).comp (of f) = i :=
RingHom.ext fun _ => @lift_of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h _
#align adjoin_root.lift_comp_of AdjoinRoot.lift_comp_of
variable (f) [Algebra R S]
def liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S :=
{ lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx with
commutes' := fun r => show lift _ _ hfx r = _ from lift_of hfx }
#align adjoin_root.lift_hom AdjoinRoot.liftHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftHom (x : S) (hfx : aeval x f = 0) :
(liftHom f x hfx : AdjoinRoot f →+* S) = lift (algebraMap R S) x hfx :=
rfl
#align adjoin_root.coe_lift_hom AdjoinRoot.coe_liftHom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AdjoinRoot.lean | 315 | 318 | theorem aeval_algHom_eq_zero (ϕ : AdjoinRoot f →ₐ[R] S) : aeval (ϕ (root f)) f = 0 := by |
have h : ϕ.toRingHom.comp (of f) = algebraMap R S := RingHom.ext_iff.mpr ϕ.commutes
rw [aeval_def, ← h, ← RingHom.map_zero ϕ.toRingHom, ← eval₂_root f, hom_eval₂]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.CondexpL2
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.condexp_L1 from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β F F' G G' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
-- G for a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G]
-- G' for integrals on a Lp add_subgroup
[NormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedSpace ℝ G'] [CompleteSpace G']
section CondexpInd
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {s t : Set α} [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section CondexpIndL1Fin
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
def condexpIndL1Fin (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞)
(x : G) : α →₁[μ] G :=
(integrable_condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).toL1 _
#align measure_theory.condexp_ind_L1_fin MeasureTheory.condexpIndL1Fin
theorem condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul (hm : m ≤ m0) [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x =ᵐ[μ] condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x :=
(integrable_condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).coeFn_toL1
#align measure_theory.condexp_ind_L1_fin_ae_eq_condexp_ind_smul MeasureTheory.condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul
variable {hm : m ≤ m0} [SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)]
-- Porting note: this lemma fills the hole in `refine' (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp _) ...`
-- which is not automatically filled in Lean 4
private theorem q {hs : MeasurableSet s} {hμs : μ s ≠ ∞} {x : G} :
Memℒp (condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x) 1 μ := by
rw [memℒp_one_iff_integrable]; apply integrable_condexpIndSMul
theorem condexpIndL1Fin_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x y : G) :
condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (x + y) =
condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x + condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs y := by
ext1
refine (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp q).symm (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp q).symm)
rw [condexpIndSMul_add]
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans (eventually_of_forall fun a => ?_)
rfl
#align measure_theory.condexp_ind_L1_fin_add MeasureTheory.condexpIndL1Fin_add
theorem condexpIndL1Fin_smul (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ) (x : G) :
condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x := by
ext1
refine (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
rw [condexpIndSMul_smul hs hμs c x]
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun y hy => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hy]
#align measure_theory.condexp_ind_L1_fin_smul MeasureTheory.condexpIndL1Fin_smul
theorem condexpIndL1Fin_smul' [NormedSpace ℝ F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : 𝕜) (x : F) :
condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs (c • x) = c • condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x := by
ext1
refine (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp q).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
rw [condexpIndSMul_smul' hs hμs c x]
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun y hy => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hy]
#align measure_theory.condexp_ind_L1_fin_smul' MeasureTheory.condexpIndL1Fin_smul'
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/CondexpL1.lean | 128 | 143 | theorem norm_condexpIndL1Fin_le (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (x : G) :
‖condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal * ‖x‖ := by |
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a : α, ‖condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x a‖ ∂μ := by positivity
rw [L1.norm_eq_integral_norm, ← ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (norm_nonneg x), ← ENNReal.toReal_mul, ←
ENNReal.toReal_ofReal this,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top (ENNReal.mul_ne_top hμs ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top),
ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
swap; · rw [← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]; exact Lp.memℒp _
have h_eq :
∫⁻ a, ‖condexpIndL1Fin hm hs hμs x a‖₊ ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ‖condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x a‖₊ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
refine (condexpIndL1Fin_ae_eq_condexpIndSMul hm hs hμs x).mono fun z hz => ?_
dsimp only
rw [hz]
rw [h_eq, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_nnnorm_condexpIndSMul_le hm hs hμs x
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
#align_import data.nat.gcd.big_operators from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"008205aa645b3f194c1da47025c5f110c8406eab"
namespace Nat
variable {ι : Type*}
theorem coprime_list_prod_left_iff {l : List ℕ} {k : ℕ} :
Coprime l.prod k ↔ ∀ n ∈ l, Coprime n k := by
induction l <;> simp [Nat.coprime_mul_iff_left, *]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/BigOperators.lean | 24 | 26 | theorem coprime_list_prod_right_iff {k : ℕ} {l : List ℕ} :
Coprime k l.prod ↔ ∀ n ∈ l, Coprime k n := by |
simp_rw [coprime_comm (n := k), coprime_list_prod_left_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Power
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
#align_import data.int.log from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1f0096e6caa61e9c849ec2adbd227e960e9dff58"
variable {R : Type*} [LinearOrderedSemifield R] [FloorSemiring R]
namespace Int
def log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ else -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊
#align int.log Int.log
theorem log_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : log b r = Nat.log b ⌊r⌋₊ :=
if_pos hr
#align int.log_of_one_le_right Int.log_of_one_le_right
theorem log_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : log b r = -Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [log, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Nat.clog_one_right,
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
#align int.log_of_right_le_one Int.log_of_right_le_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem log_natCast (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : log b (n : R) = Nat.log b n := by
cases n
· simp [log_of_right_le_one]
· rw [log_of_one_le_right, Nat.floor_natCast]
simp
#align int.log_nat_cast Int.log_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem log_ofNat (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
log b (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R)) = Nat.log b (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
log_natCast b n
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (r : R) : log b r = 0 := by
rcases le_total 1 r with h | h
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h, Nat.log_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero]
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h, Nat.clog_of_left_le_one hb, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
#align int.log_of_left_le_one Int.log_of_left_le_one
theorem log_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : log b r = 0 := by
rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (hr.trans zero_le_one),
Nat.clog_of_right_le_one ((Nat.ceil_eq_zero.mpr <| inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans_le zero_le_one),
Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
#align int.log_of_right_le_zero Int.log_of_right_le_zero
theorem zpow_log_le_self {b : ℕ} {r : R} (hb : 1 < b) (hr : 0 < r) : (b : R) ^ log b r ≤ r := by
rcases le_total 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, ← Nat.le_floor_iff hr.le]
exact Nat.pow_log_le_self b (Nat.floor_pos.mpr hr1).ne'
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
exact inv_le_of_inv_le hr (Nat.ceil_le.1 <| Nat.le_pow_clog hb _)
#align int.zpow_log_le_self Int.zpow_log_le_self
theorem lt_zpow_succ_log_self {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (r : R) : r < (b : R) ^ (log b r + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· rw [log_of_right_le_zero _ hr, zero_add, zpow_one]
exact hr.trans_lt (zero_lt_one.trans_le <| mod_cast hb.le)
rcases le_or_lt 1 r with hr1 | hr1
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ hr1]
rw [Int.ofNat_add_one_out, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]
apply Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
exact Nat.lt_pow_succ_log_self hb _
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ hr1.le]
have hcri : 1 < r⁻¹ := one_lt_inv hr hr1
have : 1 ≤ Nat.clog b ⌈r⁻¹⌉₊ :=
Nat.succ_le_of_lt (Nat.clog_pos hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le (Nat.le_ceil _))
rw [neg_add_eq_sub, ← neg_sub, ← Int.ofNat_one, ← Int.ofNat_sub this, zpow_neg, zpow_natCast,
lt_inv hr (pow_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr <| zero_lt_one.trans hb) _), ← Nat.cast_pow]
refine Nat.lt_ceil.1 ?_
exact Nat.pow_pred_clog_lt_self hb <| Nat.one_lt_cast.1 <| hcri.trans_le <| Nat.le_ceil _
#align int.lt_zpow_succ_log_self Int.lt_zpow_succ_log_self
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : ℕ) : log b (0 : R) = 0 :=
log_of_right_le_zero b le_rfl
#align int.log_zero_right Int.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : ℕ) : log b (1 : R) = 0 := by
rw [log_of_one_le_right _ le_rfl, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero]
#align int.log_one_right Int.log_one_right
-- Porting note: needed to replace b ^ z with (b : R) ^ z in the below
theorem log_zpow {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (z : ℤ) : log b ((b : R) ^ z : R) = z := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl | rfl⟩ := Int.eq_nat_or_neg z
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ (one_le_zpow_of_nonneg _ <| Int.natCast_nonneg _), zpow_natCast, ←
Nat.cast_pow, Nat.floor_natCast, Nat.log_pow hb]
exact mod_cast hb.le
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ (zpow_le_one_of_nonpos _ <| neg_nonpos.mpr (Int.natCast_nonneg _)),
zpow_neg, inv_inv, zpow_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow, Nat.ceil_natCast, Nat.clog_pow _ _ hb]
exact mod_cast hb.le
#align int.log_zpow Int.log_zpow
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right {b : ℕ} {r₁ r₂ : R} (h₀ : 0 < r₁) (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : log b r₁ ≤ log b r₂ := by
rcases le_total r₁ 1 with h₁ | h₁ <;> rcases le_total r₂ 1 with h₂ | h₂
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_right_le_one _ h₂, neg_le_neg_iff, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.clog_mono_right _ (Nat.ceil_mono <| inv_le_inv_of_le h₀ h)
· rw [log_of_right_le_one _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂]
exact (neg_nonpos.mpr (Int.natCast_nonneg _)).trans (Int.natCast_nonneg _)
· obtain rfl := le_antisymm h (h₂.trans h₁)
rfl
· rw [log_of_one_le_right _ h₁, log_of_one_le_right _ h₂, Int.ofNat_le]
exact Nat.log_mono_right (Nat.floor_mono h)
#align int.log_mono_right Int.log_mono_right
variable (R)
def zpowLogGi {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) :
GaloisCoinsertion
(fun z : ℤ =>
Subtype.mk ((b : R) ^ z) <| zpow_pos_of_pos (mod_cast zero_lt_one.trans hb) z)
fun r : Set.Ioi (0 : R) => Int.log b (r : R) :=
GaloisCoinsertion.monotoneIntro (fun r₁ _ => log_mono_right r₁.2)
(fun _ _ hz => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| (zpow_strictMono <| mod_cast hb).monotone hz)
(fun r => Subtype.coe_le_coe.mp <| zpow_log_le_self hb r.2) fun _ => log_zpow (R := R) hb _
#align int.zpow_log_gi Int.zpowLogGi
variable {R}
theorem lt_zpow_iff_log_lt {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
r < (b : R) ^ x ↔ log b r < x :=
@GaloisConnection.lt_iff_lt _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
#align int.lt_zpow_iff_log_lt Int.lt_zpow_iff_log_lt
theorem zpow_le_iff_le_log {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) {x : ℤ} {r : R} (hr : 0 < r) :
(b : R) ^ x ≤ r ↔ x ≤ log b r :=
@GaloisConnection.le_iff_le _ _ _ _ _ _ (zpowLogGi R hb).gc x ⟨r, hr⟩
#align int.zpow_le_iff_le_log Int.zpow_le_iff_le_log
def clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : ℤ :=
if 1 ≤ r then Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ else -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊
#align int.clog Int.clog
theorem clog_of_one_le_right (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : 1 ≤ r) : clog b r = Nat.clog b ⌈r⌉₊ :=
if_pos hr
#align int.clog_of_one_le_right Int.clog_of_one_le_right
theorem clog_of_right_le_one (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 1) : clog b r = -Nat.log b ⌊r⁻¹⌋₊ := by
obtain rfl | hr := hr.eq_or_lt
· rw [clog, if_pos hr, inv_one, Nat.ceil_one, Nat.floor_one, Nat.log_one_right,
Nat.clog_one_right, Int.ofNat_zero, neg_zero]
· exact if_neg hr.not_le
#align int.clog_of_right_le_one Int.clog_of_right_le_one
theorem clog_of_right_le_zero (b : ℕ) {r : R} (hr : r ≤ 0) : clog b r = 0 := by
rw [clog, if_neg (hr.trans_lt zero_lt_one).not_le, neg_eq_zero, Int.natCast_eq_zero,
Nat.log_eq_zero_iff]
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· exact Or.inr hb
· refine Or.inl (lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ hb)
exact Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one ((inv_nonpos.2 hr).trans zero_le_one)
#align int.clog_of_right_le_zero Int.clog_of_right_le_zero
@[simp]
theorem clog_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : clog b r⁻¹ = -log b r := by
cases' lt_or_le 0 r with hrp hrp
· obtain hr | hr := le_total 1 r
· rw [clog_of_right_le_one _ (inv_le_one hr), log_of_one_le_right _ hr, inv_inv]
· rw [clog_of_one_le_right _ (one_le_inv hrp hr), log_of_right_le_one _ hr, neg_neg]
· rw [clog_of_right_le_zero _ (inv_nonpos.mpr hrp), log_of_right_le_zero _ hrp, neg_zero]
#align int.clog_inv Int.clog_inv
@[simp]
theorem log_inv (b : ℕ) (r : R) : log b r⁻¹ = -clog b r := by
rw [← inv_inv r, clog_inv, neg_neg, inv_inv]
#align int.log_inv Int.log_inv
-- note this is useful for writing in reverse
theorem neg_log_inv_eq_clog (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -log b r⁻¹ = clog b r := by rw [log_inv, neg_neg]
#align int.neg_log_inv_eq_clog Int.neg_log_inv_eq_clog
theorem neg_clog_inv_eq_log (b : ℕ) (r : R) : -clog b r⁻¹ = log b r := by rw [clog_inv, neg_neg]
#align int.neg_clog_inv_eq_log Int.neg_clog_inv_eq_log
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem clog_natCast (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : clog b (n : R) = Nat.clog b n := by
cases' n with n
· simp [clog_of_right_le_one]
· rw [clog_of_one_le_right, (Nat.ceil_eq_iff (Nat.succ_ne_zero n)).mpr] <;> simp
#align int.clog_nat_cast Int.clog_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem clog_ofNat (b : ℕ) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
clog b (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : R)) = Nat.clog b (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
clog_natCast b n
theorem clog_of_left_le_one {b : ℕ} (hb : b ≤ 1) (r : R) : clog b r = 0 := by
rw [← neg_log_inv_eq_clog, log_of_left_le_one hb, neg_zero]
#align int.clog_of_left_le_one Int.clog_of_left_le_one
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Log.lean | 251 | 257 | theorem self_le_zpow_clog {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) (r : R) : r ≤ (b : R) ^ clog b r := by |
rcases le_or_lt r 0 with hr | hr
· rw [clog_of_right_le_zero _ hr, zpow_zero]
exact hr.trans zero_le_one
rw [← neg_log_inv_eq_clog, zpow_neg, le_inv hr (zpow_pos_of_pos _ _)]
· exact zpow_log_le_self hb (inv_pos.mpr hr)
· exact Nat.cast_pos.mpr (zero_le_one.trans_lt hb)
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.List.GetD
#align_import data.set.list from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2ec920d35348cb2d13ac0e1a2ad9df0fdf1a76b4"
open List
variable {α β : Type*} (l : List α)
namespace Set
| Mathlib/Data/Set/List.lean | 24 | 30 | theorem range_list_map (f : α → β) : range (map f) = { l | ∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ range f } := by |
refine antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 fun l => forall_mem_map_iff.2 fun y _ => mem_range_self _)
fun l hl => ?_
induction' l with a l ihl; · exact ⟨[], rfl⟩
rcases ihl fun x hx => hl x <| subset_cons _ _ hx with ⟨l, rfl⟩
rcases hl a (mem_cons_self _ _) with ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a :: l, map_cons _ _ _⟩
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
#align_import algebra.cubic_discriminant from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"930133160e24036d5242039fe4972407cd4f1222"
noncomputable section
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
(a b c d : R)
#align cubic Cubic
namespace Cubic
open Cubic Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
#align cubic.to_poly Cubic.toPoly
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq Cubic.prod_X_sub_C_eq
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals linarith only [hn]
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
#align cubic.coeff_eq_zero Cubic.coeff_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_a Cubic.coeff_eq_a
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_b Cubic.coeff_eq_b
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
#align cubic.coeff_eq_c Cubic.coeff_eq_c
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
#align cubic.coeff_eq_d Cubic.coeff_eq_d
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
#align cubic.a_of_eq Cubic.a_of_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 124 | 124 | theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by | rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
|
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by simp [Disjoint]
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h _ al1 _ bl2 ab => h al1 (ab ▸ bl2), fun h _ al1 al2 => h _ al1 _ al2 rfl⟩
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l l₂) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m => d (ss m)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l₁ l) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m m₁ => d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint (a :: l₁) l₂ → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : List α) : Disjoint [] l := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : List α) : Disjoint l [] := by
rw [disjoint_comm]; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint : Disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l := by simp [Disjoint]
@[simp 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l := by
rw [disjoint_comm, singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l ↔ Disjoint l₁ l ∧ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp [Disjoint, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Disjoint l l₁ ∧ Disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_append_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left : Disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ (a ∉ l₂) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_left (l₁ := [a])).trans <| by simp [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) ↔ (a ∉ l₁) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_cons_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
theorem foldr_hom (f : β₁ → β₂) (g₁ : α → β₁ → β₁) (g₂ : α → β₂ → β₂) (l : List α) (init : β₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ x (f y) = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldr g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldr g₁ init) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, H]
theorem inter_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ = filter (elem · l₂) l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∧ x ∈ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> simp [List.inter_def, mem_filter]
@[simp]
theorem pair_mem_product {xs : List α} {ys : List β} {x : α} {y : β} :
(x, y) ∈ product xs ys ↔ x ∈ xs ∧ y ∈ ys := by
simp only [product, and_imp, mem_map, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_bind, iff_self]
@[simp]
theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
theorem leftpad_prefix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
replicate (n - length l) a <+: leftpad n a l := by
simp only [IsPrefix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro l rfl
theorem leftpad_suffix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) : l <:+ (leftpad n a l) := by
simp only [IsSuffix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro (replicate (n - length l) a) rfl
-- we use ForIn.forIn as the simp normal form
@[simp] theorem forIn_eq_forIn [Monad m] : @List.forIn α β m _ = forIn := rfl
theorem forIn_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) (l : List α) (init : β) :
forIn l init f = ForInStep.run <$> (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f l := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, map_eq_pure_bind]
congr; ext (b | b) <;> simp
@[simp] theorem forM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (l₁ l₂ : List α) (f : α → m PUnit) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) := by
rw [← List.append_assoc]; apply infix_append
theorem IsPrefix.isInfix : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem IsSuffix.isInfix : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨t, [], by rw [h, append_nil]⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : List α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : List α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
theorem nil_infix (l : List α) : [] <:+: l := (nil_prefix _).isInfix
theorem prefix_refl (l : List α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
theorem suffix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
theorem infix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+: l := (prefix_refl l).isInfix
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem infix_cons : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ => ⟨a :: L₁, L₂, h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem infix_concat : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: concat l₂ a := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ =>
⟨L₁, concat L₂ a, by simp [← h, concat_eq_append, append_assoc]⟩
theorem IsPrefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
theorem IsSuffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨l₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem IsInfix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l, _, _, ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsInfix.sublist : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ (sublist_append_right ..).trans (sublist_append_left ..)
protected theorem IsInfix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsPrefix.sublist (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsPrefix.subset (hl : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsSuffix.sublist (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsSuffix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
@[simp] theorem reverse_suffix : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem reverse_prefix : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
rw [← reverse_suffix]; simp only [reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem reverse_infix : reverse l₁ <:+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩, fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e,
reverse_reverse]
· rw [append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e]
theorem IsInfix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsPrefix.length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[simp] theorem infix_nil : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ infix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem prefix_nil : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ prefix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_nil : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ suffix_refl _)⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨_, t, e⟩ => ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, e ▸ append_assoc .. ▸ ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, ⟨t, rfl⟩, s, e⟩ => ⟨s, t, append_assoc .. ▸ e⟩⟩
theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix _
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, e⟩, ll => by
injection e with _ e'; subst b
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩ (le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(Nat.le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp (prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 <|
prefix_of_prefix_length_le (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix (h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp reverse_prefix.1
reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl hl₃
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, hl₄⟩
· rintro (rfl | hl₁)
· exact (a :: l₂).suffix_refl
· exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _)
theorem infix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, t, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨t, hl₃⟩
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, t, hl₄⟩
· rintro (h | hl₁)
· exact h.isInfix
· exact infix_cons hl₁
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| l' :: _, h =>
match h with
| List.Mem.head .. => infix_append [] _ _
| List.Mem.tail _ hlMemL =>
IsInfix.trans (infix_of_mem_join hlMemL) <| (suffix_append _ _).isInfix
theorem prefix_append_right_inj (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem prefix_cons_inj (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+: l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <:+ l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem take_sublist (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+ l :=
(take_prefix n l).sublist
theorem drop_sublist (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <+ l :=
(drop_suffix n l).sublist
theorem take_subset (n) (l : List α) : take n l ⊆ l :=
(take_sublist n l).subset
theorem drop_subset (n) (l : List α) : drop n l ⊆ l :=
(drop_sublist n l).subset
theorem mem_of_mem_take {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.take n) : a ∈ l :=
take_subset n l h
theorem IsPrefix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply prefix_append
theorem IsSuffix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+ l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply suffix_append
theorem IsInfix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, ys, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append, filter_append]; apply infix_append _
theorem mem_of_mem_drop {n} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.drop n) : a ∈ l := drop_subset _ _ h
theorem disjoint_take_drop : ∀ {l : List α}, l.Nodup → m ≤ n → Disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n)
| [], _, _ => by simp
| x :: xs, hl, h => by
cases m <;> cases n <;> simp only [disjoint_cons_left, drop, not_mem_nil, disjoint_nil_left,
take, not_false_eq_true, and_self]
· case succ.zero => cases h
· cases hl with | cons h₀ h₁ =>
refine ⟨fun h => h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, ?_⟩
exact disjoint_take_drop h₁ (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
attribute [simp] Chain.nil
@[simp]
theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} : Chain R a (b :: l) ↔ R a b ∧ Chain R b l :=
⟨fun p => by cases p with | cons n p => exact ⟨n, p⟩,
fun ⟨n, p⟩ => p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : Chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem Chain.imp' {R S : α → α → Prop} (HRS : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, R a b → S a b) {a b : α}
(Hab : ∀ ⦃c⦄, R a c → S b c) {l : List α} (p : Chain R a l) : Chain S b l := by
induction p generalizing b with
| nil => constructor
| cons r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact Hab r
· exact ih (@HRS _)
theorem Chain.imp {R S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : List α}
(p : Chain R a l) : Chain S a l :=
p.imp' H (H a)
protected theorem Pairwise.chain (p : Pairwise R (a :: l)) : Chain R a l := by
let ⟨r, p'⟩ := pairwise_cons.1 p; clear p
induction p' generalizing a with
| nil => exact Chain.nil
| @cons b l r' _ IH =>
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_range' (s step) : ∀ n : Nat, length (range' s n step) = n
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congrArg succ (length_range' _ _ _)
@[simp] theorem range'_eq_nil : range' s n step = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range']
theorem mem_range' : ∀{n}, m ∈ range' s n step ↔ ∃ i < n, m = s + step * i
| 0 => by simp [range', Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1 => by
have h (i) : i ≤ n ↔ i = 0 ∨ ∃ j, i = succ j ∧ j < n := by cases i <;> simp [Nat.succ_le]
simp [range', mem_range', Nat.lt_succ, h]; simp only [← exists_and_right, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]; simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_range'_1 : m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n := by
simp [mem_range']; exact ⟨
fun ⟨i, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨Nat.le_add_right .., Nat.add_lt_add_left h _⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨m - s, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂, (Nat.add_sub_cancel' h₁).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n step, map (a + ·) (range' s n step) = range' (a + s) n step
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| s, n + 1, step => by simp [range', map_add_range' _ (s + step) n step, Nat.add_assoc]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 1,296 | 1,300 | theorem map_sub_range' (a s n : Nat) (h : a ≤ s) :
map (· - a) (range' s n step) = range' (s - a) n step := by |
conv => lhs; rw [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [← map_add_range', map_map, (?_ : _∘_ = _), map_id]
funext x; apply Nat.add_sub_cancel_left
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
#align_import data.polynomial.ring_division from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8efcf8022aac8e01df8d302dcebdbc25d6a886c8"
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section NoZeroDivisors
variable [CommSemiring R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem irreducible_of_monic (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f = 1 ∨ g = 1 := by
refine
⟨fun h f g hf hg hp => (h.2 f g hp.symm).imp hf.eq_one_of_isUnit hg.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun h =>
⟨hp1 ∘ hp.eq_one_of_isUnit, fun f g hfg =>
(h (g * C f.leadingCoeff) (f * C g.leadingCoeff) ?_ ?_ ?_).symm.imp
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one f _)
(isUnit_of_mul_eq_one g _)⟩⟩
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, mul_comm, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rwa [Monic, leadingCoeff_mul, leadingCoeff_C, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, ← Monic]
· rw [mul_mul_mul_comm, ← C_mul, ← leadingCoeff_mul, ← hfg, hp.leadingCoeff, C_1, mul_one,
mul_comm, ← hfg]
#align polynomial.irreducible_of_monic Polynomial.irreducible_of_monic
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree (hp : p.Monic) :
Irreducible p ↔
p ≠ 1 ∧ ∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → f.natDegree = 0 ∨ g.natDegree = 0 := by
by_cases hp1 : p = 1; · simp [hp1]
rw [irreducible_of_monic hp hp1, and_iff_right hp1]
refine forall₄_congr fun a b ha hb => ?_
rw [ha.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one, hb.natDegree_eq_zero_iff_eq_one]
#align polynomial.monic.irreducible_iff_nat_degree Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree' (hp : p.Monic) : Irreducible p ↔ p ≠ 1 ∧
∀ f g : R[X], f.Monic → g.Monic → f * g = p → g.natDegree ∉ Ioc 0 (p.natDegree / 2) := by
simp_rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree, mem_Ioc, Nat.le_div_iff_mul_le zero_lt_two, mul_two]
apply and_congr_right'
constructor <;> intro h f g hf hg he <;> subst he
· rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact fun ha => (h f g hf hg rfl).elim (ha.1.trans_le ha.2).ne' ha.1.ne'
· simp_rw [hf.natDegree_mul hg, pos_iff_ne_zero] at h
contrapose! h
obtain hl | hl := le_total f.natDegree g.natDegree
· exact ⟨g, f, hg, hf, mul_comm g f, h.1, add_le_add_left hl _⟩
· exact ⟨f, g, hf, hg, rfl, h.2, add_le_add_right hl _⟩
#align polynomial.monic.irreducible_iff_nat_degree' Polynomial.Monic.irreducible_iff_natDegree'
theorem Monic.irreducible_iff_lt_natDegree_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.Monic) (hp1 : p ≠ 1) :
Irreducible p ↔ ∀ q, Monic q → natDegree q ∈ Finset.Ioc 0 (natDegree p / 2) → ¬ q ∣ p := by
rw [hp.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right hp1]
constructor
· rintro h g hg hdg ⟨f, rfl⟩
exact h f g (hg.of_mul_monic_left hp) hg (mul_comm f g) hdg
· rintro h f g - hg rfl hdg
exact h g hg hdg (dvd_mul_left g f)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/RingDivision.lean | 293 | 316 | theorem Monic.not_irreducible_iff_exists_add_mul_eq_coeff (hm : p.Monic) (hnd : p.natDegree = 2) :
¬Irreducible p ↔ ∃ c₁ c₂, p.coeff 0 = c₁ * c₂ ∧ p.coeff 1 = c₁ + c₂ := by |
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· simp [natDegree_of_subsingleton] at hnd
rw [hm.irreducible_iff_natDegree', and_iff_right, hnd]
· push_neg
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl, hdb⟩
simp only [zero_lt_two, Nat.div_self, ge_iff_le,
Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, zero_add, mem_singleton] at hdb
have hda := hnd
rw [ha.natDegree_mul hb, hdb] at hda
use a.coeff 0, b.coeff 0, mul_coeff_zero a b
simpa only [nextCoeff, hnd, add_right_cancel hda, hdb] using ha.nextCoeff_mul hb
· rintro ⟨c₁, c₂, hmul, hadd⟩
refine
⟨X + C c₁, X + C c₂, monic_X_add_C _, monic_X_add_C _, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, hnd, Finset.sum_range_succ, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Finset.sum_range_one, ← hnd, hm.coeff_natDegree, hnd, hmul, hadd, C_mul, C_add, C_1]
ring
· rw [mem_Ioc, natDegree_X_add_C _]
simp
· rintro rfl
simp [natDegree_one] at hnd
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.IsLUB
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace Topology Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section DenselyOrdered
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderTopology α] [DenselyOrdered α] {a b : α}
{s : Set α}
theorem closure_Ioi' {a : α} (h : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioi_subset_Ici_self isClosed_Ici
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Ici_diff_Ioi_same, singleton_subset_iff]
exact isGLB_Ioi.mem_closure h
#align closure_Ioi' closure_Ioi'
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioi (a : α) [NoMaxOrder α] : closure (Ioi a) = Ici a :=
closure_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
#align closure_Ioi closure_Ioi
theorem closure_Iio' (h : (Iio a).Nonempty) : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Ioi' (α := αᵒᵈ) h
#align closure_Iio' closure_Iio'
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iio (a : α) [NoMinOrder α] : closure (Iio a) = Iic a :=
closure_Iio' nonempty_Iio
#align closure_Iio closure_Iio
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioo {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioo a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· cases' hab.lt_or_lt with hab hab
· rw [← diff_subset_closure_iff, Icc_diff_Ioo_same hab.le]
have hab' : (Ioo a b).Nonempty := nonempty_Ioo.2 hab
simp only [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨(isGLB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab', (isLUB_Ioo hab).mem_closure hab'⟩
· rw [Icc_eq_empty_of_lt hab]
exact empty_subset _
#align closure_Ioo closure_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ioc {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ioc_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ioc_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
#align closure_Ioc closure_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ico {a b : α} (hab : a ≠ b) : closure (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· exact closure_minimal Ico_subset_Icc_self isClosed_Icc
· apply Subset.trans _ (closure_mono Ioo_subset_Ico_self)
rw [closure_Ioo hab]
#align closure_Ico closure_Ico
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a := by
rw [← compl_Iio, interior_compl, closure_Iio' ha, compl_Iic]
#align interior_Ici' interior_Ici'
theorem interior_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Ici a) = Ioi a :=
interior_Ici' nonempty_Iio
#align interior_Ici interior_Ici
@[simp]
theorem interior_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Ici' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
#align interior_Iic' interior_Iic'
theorem interior_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : interior (Iic a) = Iio a :=
interior_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
#align interior_Iic interior_Iic
@[simp]
theorem interior_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Icc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align interior_Icc interior_Icc
@[simp]
theorem Icc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} :
Icc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Icc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ico a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ici_inter_Iio, interior_inter, interior_Ici, interior_Iio, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align interior_Ico interior_Ico
@[simp]
theorem Ico_mem_nhds_iff [NoMinOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ico, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} : interior (Ioc a b) = Ioo a b := by
rw [← Ioi_inter_Iic, interior_inter, interior_Ioi, interior_Iic, Ioi_inter_Iio]
#align interior_Ioc interior_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_mem_nhds_iff [NoMaxOrder α] {a b x : α} : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ Ioo a b := by
rw [← interior_Ioc, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
theorem closure_interior_Icc {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : closure (interior (Icc a b)) = Icc a b :=
(closure_minimal interior_subset isClosed_Icc).antisymm <|
calc
Icc a b = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Icc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Icc_self isOpen_Ioo)
#align closure_interior_Icc closure_interior_Icc
theorem Ioc_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ioc a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | h)
· simp
· calc
Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := Ioc_subset_Icc_self
_ = closure (Ioo a b) := (closure_Ioo h).symm
_ ⊆ closure (interior (Ioc a b)) :=
closure_mono (interior_maximal Ioo_subset_Ioc_self isOpen_Ioo)
#align Ioc_subset_closure_interior Ioc_subset_closure_interior
theorem Ico_subset_closure_interior (a b : α) : Ico a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ico a b)) := by
simpa only [dual_Ioc] using Ioc_subset_closure_interior (OrderDual.toDual b) (OrderDual.toDual a)
#align Ico_subset_closure_interior Ico_subset_closure_interior
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ici' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ici a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
#align frontier_Ici' frontier_Ici'
theorem frontier_Ici [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ici a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ici' nonempty_Iio
#align frontier_Ici frontier_Ici
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iic' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iic a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, ha]
#align frontier_Iic' frontier_Iic'
theorem frontier_Iic [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iic a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iic' nonempty_Ioi
#align frontier_Iic frontier_Iic
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioi' {a : α} (ha : (Ioi a).Nonempty) : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Ioi' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
#align frontier_Ioi' frontier_Ioi'
theorem frontier_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Ioi a) = {a} :=
frontier_Ioi' nonempty_Ioi
#align frontier_Ioi frontier_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Iio' {a : α} (ha : (Iio a).Nonempty) : frontier (Iio a) = {a} := by
simp [frontier, closure_Iio' ha, Iic_diff_Iio, Icc_self]
#align frontier_Iio' frontier_Iio'
theorem frontier_Iio [NoMinOrder α] {a : α} : frontier (Iio a) = {a} :=
frontier_Iio' nonempty_Iio
#align frontier_Iio frontier_Iio
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Icc [NoMinOrder α] [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) :
frontier (Icc a b) = {a, b} := by simp [frontier, h, Icc_diff_Ioo_same]
#align frontier_Icc frontier_Icc
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ioo {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioo a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ioo h.ne, interior_Ioo, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
#align frontier_Ioo frontier_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem frontier_Ico [NoMinOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ico a b) = {a, b} := by
rw [frontier, closure_Ico h.ne, interior_Ico, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
#align frontier_Ico frontier_Ico
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/DenselyOrdered.lean | 202 | 203 | theorem frontier_Ioc [NoMaxOrder α] {a b : α} (h : a < b) : frontier (Ioc a b) = {a, b} := by |
rw [frontier, closure_Ioc h.ne, interior_Ioc, Icc_diff_Ioo_same h.le]
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.MorphismProperty.Limits
import Mathlib.Data.List.TFAE
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"434e2fd21c1900747afc6d13d8be7f4eedba7218"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u
open TopologicalSpace CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
noncomputable section
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
∀ ⦃X Y : Scheme⦄ (_ : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y], Prop
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty
protected def Scheme.isIso : MorphismProperty Scheme :=
@IsIso Scheme _
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.isIso
protected def Scheme.affineTargetIsIso : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun _ _ f _ => IsIso f
#align algebraic_geometry.Scheme.affine_target_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.Scheme.affineTargetIsIso
instance : Inhabited AffineTargetMorphismProperty := ⟨Scheme.affineTargetIsIso⟩
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) :
MorphismProperty Scheme := fun _ _ f => ∃ h, @P _ _ f h
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.to_property AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty_apply (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
{X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [i : IsAffine Y] : P.toProperty f ↔ P f := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty; simp [*]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.to_property_apply AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.toProperty_apply
theorem affine_cancel_left_isIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsAffine Z] : P (f ≫ g) ↔ P g := by
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, hP.cancel_left_isIso]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_cancel_left_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.affine_cancel_left_isIso
theorem affine_cancel_right_isIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
{X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] [IsAffine Z] [IsAffine Y] :
P (f ≫ g) ↔ P f := by rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← P.toProperty_apply, hP.cancel_right_isIso]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_cancel_right_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.affine_cancel_right_isIso
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(h₁ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : X ≅ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsAffine Z], P f → P (e.hom ≫ f))
(h₂ : ∀ {X Y Z} (e : Y ≅ Z) (f : X ⟶ Y) [h : IsAffine Y],
P f → @P _ _ (f ≫ e.hom) (isAffineOfIso e.inv)) :
P.toProperty.RespectsIso := by
constructor
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨a, h₁ e f h⟩
· rintro X Y Z e f ⟨a, h⟩; exact ⟨isAffineOfIso e.inv, h₂ e f h⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.respects_iso_mk AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
def targetAffineLocally (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : MorphismProperty Scheme :=
fun {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) => ∀ U : Y.affineOpens, @P _ _ (f ∣_ U) U.prop
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocally
theorem IsAffineOpen.map_isIso {X Y : Scheme} {U : Opens Y.carrier} (hU : IsAffineOpen U)
(f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : IsAffineOpen ((Opens.map f.1.base).obj U) :=
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU
isAffineOfIso (f ∣_ U)
#align algebraic_geometry.is_affine_open.map_is_iso AlgebraicGeometry.IsAffineOpen.map_isIso
theorem targetAffineLocally_respectsIso {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso) : (targetAffineLocally P).RespectsIso := by
constructor
· introv H U
rw [morphismRestrict_comp, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
exact H U
· introv H
rintro ⟨U, hU : IsAffineOpen U⟩; dsimp
haveI : IsAffine _ := hU.map_isIso e.hom
rw [morphismRestrict_comp, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
exact H ⟨(Opens.map e.hom.val.base).obj U, hU.map_isIso e.hom⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocally_respectsIso
structure AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) : Prop where
RespectsIso : P.toProperty.RespectsIso
toBasicOpen :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (r : Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤),
P f → @P _ _ (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r) ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _)
ofBasicOpenCover :
∀ {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y] (f : X ⟶ Y) (s : Finset (Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤))
(_ : Ideal.span (s : Set (Y.presheaf.obj <| op ⊤)) = ⊤),
(∀ r : s, @P _ _ (f ∣_ Y.basicOpen r.1) ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _)) → P f
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal
@[local simp] lemma CommRingCat.id_apply (R : CommRingCat) (x : R) : 𝟙 R x = x := rfl
theorem targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal)
{X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Y.OpenCover) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)]
(h𝒰 : ∀ i, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) :
targetAffineLocally P f := by
classical
let S i := (⟨⟨Set.range (𝒰.map i).1.base, (𝒰.IsOpen i).base_open.isOpen_range⟩,
rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion (𝒰.map i)⟩ : Y.affineOpens)
intro U
apply of_affine_open_cover (P := _) U (Set.range S)
· intro U r h
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
have := hP.2 (f ∣_ U.1)
replace this := this (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top).op r) h
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at this ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrictBasicOpen f _ r)).mp this
· intro U s hs H
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
apply hP.3 (f ∣_ U.1) (s.image (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top).op))
· apply_fun Ideal.comap (Y.presheaf.map (eqToHom U.1.openEmbedding_obj_top.symm).op) at hs
rw [Ideal.comap_top] at hs
rw [← hs]
simp only [eqToHom_op, eqToHom_map, Finset.coe_image]
have : ∀ {R S : CommRingCat} (e : S = R) (s : Set S),
Ideal.span (eqToHom e '' s) = Ideal.comap (eqToHom e.symm) (Ideal.span s) := by
intro _ S e _
subst e
simp only [eqToHom_refl, CommRingCat.id_apply, Set.image_id']
-- Porting note: Lean didn't see `𝟙 _` is just ring hom id
exact (Ideal.comap_id _).symm
apply this
· rintro ⟨r, hr⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr', rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hr
specialize H ⟨r, hr'⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrictBasicOpen f _ r)).mpr H
· rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion]
intro x
exact ⟨⟨_, ⟨𝒰.f x, rfl⟩⟩, 𝒰.Covers x⟩
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩
specialize h𝒰 i
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at h𝒰 ⊢
exact (hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)).mpr h𝒰
#align algebraic_geometry.target_affine_locally_of_open_cover AlgebraicGeometry.targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover
open List in
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_TFAE
{P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[targetAffineLocally P f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤) (hU' : ∀ i, IsAffineOpen (U i)),
∀ i, @P _ _ (f ∣_ U i) (hU' i)] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro H U g h₁ h₂
replace H := H ⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion g⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H ⊢
rwa [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro H 𝒰 h𝒰 i
apply H
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun H => ⟨Y.affineCover, inferInstance, H Y.affineCover⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1
· rintro ⟨𝒰, h𝒰, H⟩; exact targetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover hP f 𝒰 H
tfae_have 5 → 2
· rintro ⟨ι, U, hU, hU', H⟩
refine ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop U hU, hU', ?_⟩
intro i
specialize H i
rw [← P.toProperty_apply, ← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
rw [← P.toProperty_apply] at H
convert H
all_goals ext1; exact Subtype.range_coe
tfae_have 1 → 5
· intro H
refine ⟨Y.carrier, fun x => (Scheme.Hom.opensRange <| Y.affineCover.map x),
?_, fun i => rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _, ?_⟩
· rw [eq_top_iff]; intro x _; erw [Opens.mem_iSup]; exact ⟨x, Y.affineCover.Covers x⟩
· intro i; exact H ⟨_, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
tfae_finish
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.isLocalOfOpenCoverImply (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso)
(H : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y),
(∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) →
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U)) :
P.IsLocal := by
refine ⟨hP, ?_, ?_⟩
· introv h
haveI : IsAffine _ := (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine r
delta morphismRestrict
rw [affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
refine @H _ _ f ⟨Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y), ?_, ?_⟩ _ (Y.ofRestrict _) _ _
· intro i; dsimp; infer_instance
· intro i; dsimp
rwa [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
· introv hs hs'
replace hs := ((topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpen_union_eq_self_iff _).mpr hs
have := H f ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop _ hs, ?_, ?_⟩ (𝟙 _)
· rwa [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP]
at this
· intro i; exact (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine _
· rintro (i : s)
specialize hs' i
haveI : IsAffine _ := (topIsAffineOpen Y).basicOpenIsAffine i.1
delta morphismRestrict at hs'
rwa [affine_cancel_left_isIso hP] at hs'
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local_of_open_cover_imply AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.isLocalOfOpenCoverImply
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_iff {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y)
[h𝒰 : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] :
targetAffineLocally P f ↔ ∀ i, @P _ _ (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) (h𝒰 i) := by
refine ⟨fun H => let h := ((hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 2).mp H; ?_,
fun H => let h := ((hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 1 0).mp; ?_⟩
· exact fun i => h 𝒰 i
· exact h ⟨𝒰, inferInstance, H⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_openCover_iff
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_target_iff {P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty}
(hP : P.IsLocal) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
targetAffineLocally P f ↔ P f := by
haveI : ∀ i, IsAffine (Scheme.OpenCover.obj (Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y)) i) := fun i => by
dsimp; infer_instance
rw [hP.affine_openCover_iff f (Scheme.openCoverOfIsIso (𝟙 Y))]
trans P (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝟙 _) ⟶ _)
· exact ⟨fun H => H PUnit.unit, fun H _ => H⟩
rw [← Category.comp_id pullback.snd, ← pullback.condition, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.affine_target_iff AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.affine_target_iff
structure PropertyIsLocalAtTarget (P : MorphismProperty Scheme) : Prop where
RespectsIso : P.RespectsIso
restrict : ∀ {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y.carrier), P f → P (f ∣_ U)
of_openCover :
∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y),
(∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i)) → P f
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget
lemma propertyIsLocalAtTarget_of_morphismRestrict (P : MorphismProperty Scheme)
(hP₁ : P.RespectsIso)
(hP₂ : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y.carrier), P f → P (f ∣_ U))
(hP₃ : ∀ {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier)
(_ : iSup U = ⊤), (∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)) → P f) :
PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P where
RespectsIso := hP₁
restrict := hP₂
of_openCover {X Y} f 𝒰 h𝒰 := by
apply hP₃ f (fun i : 𝒰.J => Scheme.Hom.opensRange (𝒰.map i)) 𝒰.iSup_opensRange
simp_rw [hP₁.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
exact h𝒰
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
{P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty} (hP : P.IsLocal) :
PropertyIsLocalAtTarget (targetAffineLocally P) := by
constructor
· exact targetAffineLocally_respectsIso hP.1
· intro X Y f U H V
rw [← P.toProperty_apply (i := V.2), hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictRestrict f _ _)]
convert H ⟨_, IsAffineOpen.imageIsOpenImmersion V.2 (Y.ofRestrict _)⟩
rw [← P.toProperty_apply]
· rintro X Y f 𝒰 h𝒰
-- Porting note: rewrite `[(hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1` directly complains about
-- metavariables
have h01 := (hP.affine_openCover_TFAE f).out 0 1
rw [h01]
refine ⟨𝒰.bind fun _ => Scheme.affineCover _, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro i; dsimp [Scheme.OpenCover.bind]; infer_instance
· intro i
specialize h𝒰 i.1
-- Porting note: rewrite `[(hP.affine_openCover_TFAE pullback.snd).out 0 1` directly
-- complains about metavariables
have h02 := (hP.affine_openCover_TFAE (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶ _)).out 0 2
rw [h02] at h𝒰
specialize h𝒰 (Scheme.affineCover _) i.2
let e : pullback f ((𝒰.obj i.fst).affineCover.map i.snd ≫ 𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶
pullback (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i.fst) ⟶ _)
((𝒰.obj i.fst).affineCover.map i.snd) := by
refine (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine (pullbackRightPullbackFstIso _ _ _).inv ≫ ?_
refine (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ ?_
refine pullback.map _ _ _ _ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) ?_ ?_ <;>
simp only [Category.comp_id, Category.id_comp, pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_snd]
rw [← affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1 e] at h𝒰
convert h𝒰 using 1
simp [e]
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.is_local.target_affine_locally_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.IsLocal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
open List in
theorem PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_TFAE {P : MorphismProperty Scheme}
(hP : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[P f,
∃ 𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y,
∀ i : 𝒰.J, P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (i : 𝒰.J),
P (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ U : Opens Y.carrier, P (f ∣_ U),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion g], P (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ U),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤), ∀ i, P (f ∣_ U i)] := by
tfae_have 2 → 1
· rintro ⟨𝒰, H⟩; exact hP.3 f 𝒰 H
tfae_have 1 → 4
· intro H U; exact hP.2 f U H
tfae_have 4 → 3
· intro H 𝒰 i
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
exact H <| Scheme.Hom.opensRange (𝒰.map i)
tfae_have 3 → 2
· exact fun H => ⟨Y.affineCover, H Y.affineCover⟩
tfae_have 4 → 5
· intro H U g hg
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
apply H
tfae_have 5 → 4
· intro H U
erw [hP.1.cancel_left_isIso]
apply H
tfae_have 4 → 6
· intro H; exact ⟨PUnit, fun _ => ⊤, ciSup_const, fun _ => H _⟩
tfae_have 6 → 2
· rintro ⟨ι, U, hU, H⟩
refine ⟨Y.openCoverOfSuprEqTop U hU, ?_⟩
intro i
rw [← hP.1.arrow_mk_iso_iff (morphismRestrictOpensRange f _)]
convert H i
all_goals ext1; exact Subtype.range_coe
tfae_finish
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target.open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_TFAE
theorem PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_iff {P : MorphismProperty Scheme}
(hP : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget P) {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) :
P f ↔ ∀ i, P (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) := by
-- Porting note: couldn't get the term mode proof work
refine ⟨fun H => let h := ((hP.openCover_TFAE f).out 0 2).mp H; fun i => ?_,
fun H => let h := ((hP.openCover_TFAE f).out 1 0).mp; ?_⟩
· exact h 𝒰 i
· exact h ⟨𝒰, H⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.property_is_local_at_target.open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.PropertyIsLocalAtTarget.openCover_iff
def AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) :
AffineTargetMorphismProperty :=
fun {X _} f _ =>
∀ {U₁ U₂ : Scheme} (f₁ : U₁ ⟶ X) (f₂ : U₂ ⟶ X) [IsAffine U₁] [IsAffine U₂] [IsOpenImmersion f₁]
[IsOpenImmersion f₂], P (pullback.mapDesc f₁ f₂ f)
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
theorem AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal_respectsIso (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty)
(hP : P.toProperty.RespectsIso) : P.diagonal.toProperty.RespectsIso := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
apply AffineTargetMorphismProperty.respectsIso_mk
· introv H _ _
rw [pullback.mapDesc_comp, affine_cancel_left_isIso hP, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
-- Porting note: add the following two instances
have i1 : IsOpenImmersion (f₁ ≫ e.hom) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have i2 : IsOpenImmersion (f₂ ≫ e.hom) := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
apply H
· introv H _ _
-- Porting note: add the following two instances
have _ : IsAffine Z := isAffineOfIso e.inv
rw [pullback.mapDesc_comp, affine_cancel_right_isIso hP]
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.affine_target_morphism_property.diagonal_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal_respectsIso
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/Basic.lean | 507 | 524 | theorem diagonalTargetAffineLocallyOfOpenCover (P : AffineTargetMorphismProperty) (hP : P.IsLocal)
{X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)]
(𝒰' : ∀ i, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) [∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)]
(h𝒰' : ∀ i j k, P (pullback.mapDesc ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k) pullback.snd)) :
(targetAffineLocally P).diagonal f := by |
let 𝒱 := (Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfBase 𝒰 f f).bind fun i =>
Scheme.Pullback.openCoverOfLeftRight.{u} (𝒰' i) (𝒰' i) pullback.snd pullback.snd
have i1 : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒱.obj i) := fun i => by dsimp [𝒱]; infer_instance
apply (hP.affine_openCover_iff _ 𝒱).mpr
rintro ⟨i, j, k⟩
dsimp [𝒱]
convert (affine_cancel_left_isIso hP.1
(pullbackDiagonalMapIso _ _ ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).inv pullback.snd).mp _
pick_goal 3
· convert h𝒰' i j k; apply pullback.hom_ext <;> simp
all_goals apply pullback.hom_ext <;>
simp only [Category.assoc, pullback.lift_fst, pullback.lift_snd, pullback.lift_fst_assoc,
pullback.lift_snd_assoc]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.NthRewrite
#align_import data.nat.gcd.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e8638a0fcaf73e4500469f368ef9494e495099b3"
namespace Nat
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℕ} (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b) (hd : ∀ e : ℕ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) :
d = a.gcd b :=
(dvd_antisymm (hd _ (gcd_dvd_left a b) (gcd_dvd_right a b)) (dvd_gcd hda hdb)).symm
#align nat.gcd_greatest Nat.gcd_greatest
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + k * m) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + k * m), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m * k) = gcd m n := by
simp [gcd_rec m (n + m * k), gcd_rec m n]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (k * m + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_right (m n k : ℕ) : gcd m (m * k + n) = gcd m n := by simp [add_comm _ n]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_right_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + k * n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_right_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_right_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_mul_left_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (m + n * k) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_mul_left_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left Nat.gcd_add_mul_left_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_right_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (k * n + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_right_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_right_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_mul_left_add_left (m n k : ℕ) : gcd (n * k + m) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_mul_left_add_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left Nat.gcd_mul_left_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (n + m) = gcd m n :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]) (gcd_add_mul_right_right m n 1)
#align nat.gcd_add_self_right Nat.gcd_add_self_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_add_self_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) n = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
#align nat.gcd_add_self_left Nat.gcd_add_self_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_left (m n : ℕ) : gcd (m + n) m = gcd n m := by rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_left]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_left Nat.gcd_self_add_left
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_add_right (m n : ℕ) : gcd m (m + n) = gcd m n := by
rw [add_comm, gcd_add_self_right]
#align nat.gcd_self_add_right Nat.gcd_self_add_right
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) m = gcd n m := by
calc
gcd (n - m) m = gcd (n - m + m) m := by rw [← gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
_ = gcd n m := by rw [Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_sub_self_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd m (n - m) = gcd m n := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_sub_self_left h, gcd_comm]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_left {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd (n - m) n = gcd m n := by
have := Nat.sub_add_cancel h
rw [gcd_comm m n, ← this, gcd_add_self_left (n - m) m]
have : gcd (n - m) n = gcd (n - m) m := by
nth_rw 2 [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [gcd_add_self_right, gcd_comm]
convert this
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self_sub_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : gcd n (n - m) = gcd n m := by
rw [gcd_comm, gcd_self_sub_left h, gcd_comm]
theorem lcm_dvd_mul (m n : ℕ) : lcm m n ∣ m * n :=
lcm_dvd (dvd_mul_right _ _) (dvd_mul_left _ _)
#align nat.lcm_dvd_mul Nat.lcm_dvd_mul
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {m n k : ℕ} : lcm m n ∣ k ↔ m ∣ k ∧ n ∣ k :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(dvd_lcm_left _ _).trans h, (dvd_lcm_right _ _).trans h⟩, and_imp.2 lcm_dvd⟩
#align nat.lcm_dvd_iff Nat.lcm_dvd_iff
theorem lcm_pos {m n : ℕ} : 0 < m → 0 < n → 0 < m.lcm n := by
simp_rw [pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact lcm_ne_zero
#align nat.lcm_pos Nat.lcm_pos
theorem lcm_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (m * k) = m * n.lcm k := by
apply dvd_antisymm
· exact lcm_dvd (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_left n k)) (mul_dvd_mul_left m (dvd_lcm_right n k))
· have h : m ∣ lcm (m * n) (m * k) := (dvd_mul_right m n).trans (dvd_lcm_left (m * n) (m * k))
rw [← dvd_div_iff h, lcm_dvd_iff, dvd_div_iff h, dvd_div_iff h, ← lcm_dvd_iff]
theorem lcm_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} : (m * n).lcm (k * n) = m.lcm k * n := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm k n, lcm_mul_left, mul_comm]
instance (m n : ℕ) : Decidable (Coprime m n) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (gcd m n = 1))
theorem Coprime.lcm_eq_mul {m n : ℕ} (h : Coprime m n) : lcm m n = m * n := by
rw [← one_mul (lcm m n), ← h.gcd_eq_one, gcd_mul_lcm]
#align nat.coprime.lcm_eq_mul Nat.Coprime.lcm_eq_mul
theorem Coprime.symmetric : Symmetric Coprime := fun _ _ => Coprime.symm
#align nat.coprime.symmetric Nat.Coprime.symmetric
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_right {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k n) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ m :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_left h n⟩
#align nat.coprime.dvd_mul_right Nat.Coprime.dvd_mul_right
theorem Coprime.dvd_mul_left {m n k : ℕ} (H : Coprime k m) : k ∣ m * n ↔ k ∣ n :=
⟨H.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left, fun h => dvd_mul_of_dvd_right h m⟩
#align nat.coprime.dvd_mul_left Nat.Coprime.dvd_mul_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/GCD/Basic.lean | 166 | 167 | theorem coprime_add_self_right {m n : ℕ} : Coprime m (n + m) ↔ Coprime m n := by |
rw [Coprime, Coprime, gcd_add_self_right]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.ZPowers
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Membership
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset
#align_import algebra.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"30413fc89f202a090a54d78e540963ed3de0056e"
variable {α β γ : Type*} {f g : α → β} {c c₁ c₂ x : α}
open Set
namespace Function
@[simp]
def Periodic [Add α] (f : α → β) (c : α) : Prop :=
∀ x : α, f (x + c) = f x
#align function.periodic Function.Periodic
protected theorem Periodic.funext [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) : (fun x => f (x + c)) = f :=
funext h
#align function.periodic.funext Function.Periodic.funext
protected theorem Periodic.comp [Add α] (h : Periodic f c) (g : β → γ) : Periodic (g ∘ f) c := by
simp_all
#align function.periodic.comp Function.Periodic.comp
theorem Periodic.comp_addHom [Add α] [Add γ] (h : Periodic f c) (g : AddHom γ α) (g_inv : α → γ)
(hg : RightInverse g_inv g) : Periodic (f ∘ g) (g_inv c) := fun x => by
simp only [hg c, h (g x), map_add, comp_apply]
#align function.periodic.comp_add_hom Function.Periodic.comp_addHom
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.mul [Add α] [Mul β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f * g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.mul Function.Periodic.mul
#align function.periodic.add Function.Periodic.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.div [Add α] [Div β] (hf : Periodic f c) (hg : Periodic g c) :
Periodic (f / g) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.div Function.Periodic.div
#align function.periodic.sub Function.Periodic.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.List.periodic_prod [Add α] [Monoid β] (l : List (α → β))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Periodic f c) : Periodic l.prod c := by
induction' l with g l ih hl
· simp
· rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
simpa only [List.prod_cons] using hl.1.mul (ih hl.2)
#align list.periodic_prod List.periodic_prod
#align list.periodic_sum List.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Multiset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset (α → β))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, Periodic f c) : Periodic s.prod c :=
(s.prod_toList ▸ s.toList.periodic_prod) fun f hf => hs f <| Multiset.mem_toList.mp hf
#align multiset.periodic_prod Multiset.periodic_prod
#align multiset.periodic_sum Multiset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Finset.periodic_prod [Add α] [CommMonoid β] {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → β}
(s : Finset ι) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, Periodic (f i) c) : Periodic (∏ i ∈ s, f i) c :=
s.prod_to_list f ▸ (s.toList.map f).periodic_prod (by simpa [-Periodic] )
#align finset.periodic_prod Finset.periodic_prod
#align finset.periodic_sum Finset.periodic_sum
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Periodic.smul [Add α] [SMul γ β] (h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) :
Periodic (a • f) c := by simp_all
#align function.periodic.smul Function.Periodic.smul
#align function.periodic.vadd Function.Periodic.vadd
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul Function.Periodic.const_smul
protected theorem Periodic.const_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a • x)) (a⁻¹ • c) := fun x => by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp only [ha, zero_smul]
· simpa only [smul_add, smul_inv_smul₀ ha] using h (a • x)
#align function.periodic.const_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_smul₀
protected theorem Periodic.const_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a * x)) (a⁻¹ * c) :=
Periodic.const_smul₀ h a
#align function.periodic.const_mul Function.Periodic.const_mul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul [AddMonoid α] [Group γ] [DistribMulAction γ α] (h : Periodic f c)
(a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul
theorem Periodic.const_inv_smul₀ [AddCommMonoid α] [DivisionSemiring γ] [Module γ α]
(h : Periodic f c) (a : γ) : Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ • x)) (a • c) := by
simpa only [inv_inv] using h.const_smul₀ a⁻¹
#align function.periodic.const_inv_smul₀ Function.Periodic.const_inv_smul₀
theorem Periodic.const_inv_mul [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a⁻¹ * x)) (a * c) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ a
#align function.periodic.const_inv_mul Function.Periodic.const_inv_mul
theorem Periodic.mul_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c * a⁻¹) :=
h.const_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const Function.Periodic.mul_const
theorem Periodic.mul_const' [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a)) (c / a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const a
#align function.periodic.mul_const' Function.Periodic.mul_const'
theorem Periodic.mul_const_inv [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x * a⁻¹)) (c * a) :=
h.const_inv_smul₀ (MulOpposite.op a)
#align function.periodic.mul_const_inv Function.Periodic.mul_const_inv
theorem Periodic.div_const [DivisionSemiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x / a)) (c * a) := by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_const_inv a
#align function.periodic.div_const Function.Periodic.div_const
theorem Periodic.add_period [AddSemigroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ + c₂) := by simp_all [← add_assoc]
#align function.periodic.add_period Function.Periodic.add_period
theorem Periodic.sub_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (x : α) : f (x - c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_add_cancel] using (h (x - c)).symm
#align function.periodic.sub_eq Function.Periodic.sub_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_eq' [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : f (c - x) = f (-x) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h (-x)
#align function.periodic.sub_eq' Function.Periodic.sub_eq'
protected theorem Periodic.neg [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) : Periodic f (-c) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, Periodic] using h.sub_eq
#align function.periodic.neg Function.Periodic.neg
theorem Periodic.sub_period [AddGroup α] (h1 : Periodic f c₁) (h2 : Periodic f c₂) :
Periodic f (c₁ - c₂) := fun x => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← add_assoc, h2.neg, h1]
#align function.periodic.sub_period Function.Periodic.sub_period
theorem Periodic.const_add [AddSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a + x)) c := fun x => by simpa [add_assoc] using h (a + x)
#align function.periodic.const_add Function.Periodic.const_add
theorem Periodic.add_const [AddCommSemigroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x + a)) c := fun x => by
simpa only [add_right_comm] using h (x + a)
#align function.periodic.add_const Function.Periodic.add_const
theorem Periodic.const_sub [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (a - x)) c := fun x => by
simp only [← sub_sub, h.sub_eq]
#align function.periodic.const_sub Function.Periodic.const_sub
theorem Periodic.sub_const [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (a : α) :
Periodic (fun x => f (x - a)) c := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.add_const (-a)
#align function.periodic.sub_const Function.Periodic.sub_const
theorem Periodic.nsmul [AddMonoid α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n • c) := by
induction n <;> simp_all [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_nsmul, ← add_assoc, zero_nsmul]
#align function.periodic.nsmul Function.Periodic.nsmul
theorem Periodic.nat_mul [Semiring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (n * c) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.nsmul n
#align function.periodic.nat_mul Function.Periodic.nat_mul
theorem Periodic.neg_nsmul [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n • c)) :=
(h.nsmul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nsmul Function.Periodic.neg_nsmul
theorem Periodic.neg_nat_mul [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : Periodic f (-(n * c)) :=
(h.nat_mul n).neg
#align function.periodic.neg_nat_mul Function.Periodic.neg_nat_mul
theorem Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq [AddGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n • c) = f x := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h.neg_nsmul n x
#align function.periodic.sub_nsmul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nsmul_eq
theorem Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n * c) = f x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using h.sub_nsmul_eq n
#align function.periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq Function.Periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq
theorem Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq [AddCommGroup α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) :
f (n • c - x) = f (-x) :=
(h.nsmul n).sub_eq'
#align function.periodic.nsmul_sub_eq Function.Periodic.nsmul_sub_eq
| Mathlib/Algebra/Periodic.lean | 225 | 226 | theorem Periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq [Ring α] (h : Periodic f c) (n : ℕ) : f (n * c - x) = f (-x) := by |
simpa only [sub_eq_neg_add] using h.nat_mul n (-x)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Basic
#align_import data.real.cau_seq_completion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cf4c49c445991489058260d75dae0ff2b1abca28"
namespace CauSeq.Completion
open CauSeq
section
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedField α]
variable {β : Type*} [Ring β] (abv : β → α) [IsAbsoluteValue abv]
-- TODO: rename this to `CauSeq.Completion` instead of `CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy`.
def Cauchy :=
@Quotient (CauSeq _ abv) CauSeq.equiv
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align cau_seq.completion.Cauchy CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy
variable {abv}
def mk : CauSeq _ abv → Cauchy abv :=
Quotient.mk''
#align cau_seq.completion.mk CauSeq.Completion.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_mk (f : CauSeq _ abv) : @Eq (Cauchy abv) ⟦f⟧ (mk f) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_eq_mk CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq_mk
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
Quotient.eq
#align cau_seq.completion.mk_eq CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
def ofRat (x : β) : Cauchy abv :=
mk (const abv x)
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat CauSeq.Completion.ofRat
instance : Zero (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 0⟩
instance : One (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨ofRat 1⟩
instance : Inhabited (Cauchy abv) :=
⟨0⟩
theorem ofRat_zero : (ofRat 0 : Cauchy abv) = 0 :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_zero CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_zero
theorem ofRat_one : (ofRat 1 : Cauchy abv) = 1 :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_one CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_one
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/CauSeq/Completion.lean | 73 | 75 | theorem mk_eq_zero {f : CauSeq _ abv} : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero f := by |
have : mk f = 0 ↔ LimZero (f - 0) := Quotient.eq
rwa [sub_zero] at this
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
#align_import analysis.quaternion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"07992a1d1f7a4176c6d3f160209608be4e198566"
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Quaternion] notation "ℍ" => Quaternion ℝ
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Quaternion
instance : Inner ℝ ℍ :=
⟨fun a b => (a * star b).re⟩
theorem inner_self (a : ℍ) : ⟪a, a⟫ = normSq a :=
rfl
#align quaternion.inner_self Quaternion.inner_self
theorem inner_def (a b : ℍ) : ⟪a, b⟫ = (a * star b).re :=
rfl
#align quaternion.inner_def Quaternion.inner_def
noncomputable instance : NormedAddCommGroup ℍ :=
@InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup ℝ ℍ _ _ _
{ toInner := inferInstance
conj_symm := fun x y => by simp [inner_def, mul_comm]
nonneg_re := fun x => normSq_nonneg
definite := fun x => normSq_eq_zero.1
add_left := fun x y z => by simp only [inner_def, add_mul, add_re]
smul_left := fun x y r => by simp [inner_def] }
noncomputable instance : InnerProductSpace ℝ ℍ :=
InnerProductSpace.ofCore _
theorem normSq_eq_norm_mul_self (a : ℍ) : normSq a = ‖a‖ * ‖a‖ := by
rw [← inner_self, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align quaternion.norm_sq_eq_norm_sq Quaternion.normSq_eq_norm_mul_self
instance : NormOneClass ℍ :=
⟨by rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq.map_one, Real.sqrt_one]⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem norm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_coe, Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs, Real.norm_eq_abs]
#align quaternion.norm_coe Quaternion.norm_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem nnnorm_coe (a : ℝ) : ‖(a : ℍ)‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
Subtype.ext <| norm_coe a
#align quaternion.nnnorm_coe Quaternion.nnnorm_coe
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10959): simp cannot prove this
| Mathlib/Analysis/Quaternion.lean | 83 | 84 | theorem norm_star (a : ℍ) : ‖star a‖ = ‖a‖ := by |
simp_rw [norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner, inner_self, normSq_star]
|
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
#align_import analysis.special_functions.complex.arg from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π
#align complex.arg Complex.arg
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / abs x := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg,
Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).1 (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_abs_le_one x)).2,
Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
#align complex.sin_arg Complex.sin_arg
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / abs x := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (abs.pos hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
#align complex.cos_arg Complex.cos_arg
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ↑(abs x) * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : abs x ≠ 0 := abs.ne_zero hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm (abs x)]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[simp]
theorem abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (abs x * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma abs_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : abs x * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem abs_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : abs z = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = abs z * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z := abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.abs_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
#align complex.abs_eq_one_iff Complex.abs_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.range_exp_mul_I Complex.range_exp_mul_I
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, map_mul, abs_cos_add_sin_mul_I, abs_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
cases' h₁ with h₁ h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
#align complex.arg_zero Complex.arg_zero
theorem ext_abs_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : abs x = abs y) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
#align complex.ext_abs_arg Complex.ext_abs_arg
theorem ext_abs_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ abs x = abs y ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_abs_arg⟩
#align complex.ext_abs_arg_iff Complex.ext_abs_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (abs.pos hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
#align complex.arg_mem_Ioc Complex.arg_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
#align complex.range_arg Complex.range_arg
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
#align complex.arg_le_pi Complex.arg_le_pi
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
#align complex.neg_pi_lt_arg Complex.neg_pi_lt_arg
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi Complex.abs_arg_le_pi
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff (abs.pos h₀), zero_mul]
#align complex.arg_nonneg_iff Complex.arg_nonneg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
#align complex.arg_neg_iff Complex.arg_neg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (abs.pos hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
#align complex.arg_real_mul Complex.arg_real_mul
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (abs y / abs x : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_abs_arg_iff, map_mul, map_div₀, abs_ofReal, abs_abs,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (abs.ne_zero hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (abs.pos hy) (abs.pos hx)
#align complex.arg_eq_arg_iff Complex.arg_eq_arg_iff
@[simp]
theorem arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
#align complex.arg_one Complex.arg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
#align complex.arg_neg_one Complex.arg_neg_one
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_I Complex.arg_I
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_neg_I Complex.arg_neg_I
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h, div_div_div_cancel_right _ (abs.ne_zero h)]
#align complex.tan_arg Complex.tan_arg
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_nonneg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [abs.nonneg]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
#align complex.arg_eq_zero_iff Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_iff
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
#align complex.arg_lt_pi_iff Complex.arg_lt_pi_iff
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
#align complex.arg_of_real_of_neg Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
#align complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· cases' z with x y
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
#align complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
if_pos hx
#align complex.arg_of_re_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
#align complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
#align complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero Complex.arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
#align complex.arg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / abs z) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
#align complex.arg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, abs_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
#align complex.arg_conj Complex.arg_conj
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
#align complex.arg_inv Complex.arg_inv
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma abs_eq_one_iff' : abs x = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [abs_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq $ toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using abs_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
_root_.abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
#align complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or_iff]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or_iff]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true_iff, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false_iff, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_abs]
exacts [hre.ne, abs.pos <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
#align complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff Complex.neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff]
#align complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff Complex.abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
#align complex.arg_conj_coe_angle Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
#align complex.arg_inv_coe_angle Complex.arg_inv_coe_angle
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by
rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, hi.ne, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x + π ↔ x.im < 0 ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ 0 < x.re := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hi, arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le]
simp [hr.not_lt, ← two_mul, Real.pi_ne_zero]
· simp [hr, hi, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr)]
simp [hr]
· simp [hi, hi.ne.symm, hi.not_lt, arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos, sub_eq_add_neg, ←
add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq, Real.pi_ne_zero]
#align complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff Complex.arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_iff
theorem arg_neg_coe_angle {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : (arg (-x) : Real.Angle) = arg x + π := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg hi, Real.Angle.coe_add]
· rw [(ext rfl hi : x = x.re)]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_neg hr, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr).le, ←
Real.Angle.coe_add, ← two_mul, Real.Angle.coe_two_pi, Real.Angle.coe_zero]
· exact False.elim (hx (ext hr hi))
· rw [arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hr.le, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hr),
Real.Angle.coe_zero, zero_add]
· rw [arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos hi, Real.Angle.coe_sub, Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi]
#align complex.arg_neg_coe_angle Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
have hi : toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ θ
ring
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I hr hi using 3
simp [toIocMod, cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi, sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = toIocMod Real.two_pi_pos (-π) θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_to_Ioc_mod Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : ℝ) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_eq_toIocMod hr, toIocMod_sub_self, toIocDiv_eq_neg_floor,
zsmul_eq_mul]
ring_nf
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub (θ : ℝ) :
arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) - θ = 2 * π * ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (r * (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I)) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
induction' θ using Real.Angle.induction_on with θ
rw [Real.Angle.cos_coe, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use ⌊(π - θ) / (2 * π)⌋
exact mod_cast arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_sub hr θ
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (θ : Real.Angle) :
(arg (Real.Angle.cos θ + Real.Angle.sin θ * I) : Real.Angle) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle zero_lt_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle Complex.arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle
theorem arg_mul_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x * y) : Real.Angle) = arg x + arg y := by
convert arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I_coe_angle (mul_pos (abs.pos hx) (abs.pos hy))
(arg x + arg y : Real.Angle) using
3
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.coe_add, Real.Angle.sin_coe, Real.Angle.cos_coe, ofReal_cos, ofReal_sin,
cos_add_sin_I, ofReal_add, add_mul, exp_add, ofReal_mul]
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm (exp _), ← mul_assoc (abs y : ℂ), abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I, mul_comm y, ←
mul_assoc, abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
#align complex.arg_mul_coe_angle Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle
theorem arg_div_coe_angle {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
(arg (x / y) : Real.Angle) = arg x - arg y := by
rw [div_eq_mul_inv, arg_mul_coe_angle hx (inv_ne_zero hy), arg_inv_coe_angle, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align complex.arg_div_coe_angle Complex.arg_div_coe_angle
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg (z : ℂ) : (arg z : Real.Angle).toReal = arg z := by
rw [Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
exact arg_mem_Ioc _
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_to_real_eq_arg Complex.arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal {z : ℂ} {θ : Real.Angle} :
(arg z : Real.Angle) = θ ↔ arg z = θ.toReal := by
rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_to_real Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal
@[simp]
theorem arg_coe_angle_eq_iff {x y : ℂ} : (arg x : Real.Angle) = arg y ↔ arg x = arg y := by
simp_rw [← Real.Angle.toReal_inj, arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg]
#align complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff
lemma arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx₀ : x ≠ 0) (hy₀ : y ≠ 0) :
(x * y).arg = x.arg + y.arg ↔ arg x + arg y ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [← arg_coe_angle_toReal_eq_arg, arg_mul_coe_angle hx₀ hy₀, ← Real.Angle.coe_add,
Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc]
alias ⟨_, arg_mul⟩ := arg_mul_eq_add_arg_iff
section Continuity
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos (hx : 0 < x.re) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin (x.im / abs x) :=
((continuous_re.tendsto _).eventually (lt_mem_nhds hx)).mono fun _ hy => arg_of_re_nonneg hy.le
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 < x.im) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ 0 < y.im from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hy.1 hy.2.le
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ 0 < x.im)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_zero continuous_im)
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π := by
suffices h_forall_nhds : ∀ᶠ y : ℂ in 𝓝 x, y.re < 0 ∧ y.im < 0 from
h_forall_nhds.mono fun y hy => arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hy.1 hy.2
refine IsOpen.eventually_mem ?_ (⟨hx_re, hx_im⟩ : x.re < 0 ∧ x.im < 0)
exact
IsOpen.and (isOpen_lt continuous_re continuous_zero) (isOpen_lt continuous_im continuous_zero)
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_re_neg_of_im_neg
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos (hz : 0 < im z) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 z] fun x => Real.arccos (x.re / abs x) :=
((continuous_im.tendsto _).eventually (lt_mem_nhds hz)).mono fun _ => arg_of_im_pos
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos
theorem arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg (hz : im z < 0) : arg =ᶠ[𝓝 z] fun x => -Real.arccos (x.re / abs x) :=
((continuous_im.tendsto _).eventually (gt_mem_nhds hz)).mono fun _ => arg_of_im_neg
#align complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg Complex.arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg
theorem continuousAt_arg (h : x ∈ slitPlane) : ContinuousAt arg x := by
have h₀ : abs x ≠ 0 := by
rw [abs.ne_zero_iff]
exact slitPlane_ne_zero h
rw [mem_slitPlane_iff, ← lt_or_lt_iff_ne] at h
rcases h with (hx_re | hx_im | hx_im)
exacts [(Real.continuousAt_arcsin.comp
(continuous_im.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_re_pos hx_re).symm,
(Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp
(continuous_re.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).neg.congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_im_neg hx_im).symm,
(Real.continuous_arccos.continuousAt.comp
(continuous_re.continuousAt.div continuous_abs.continuousAt h₀)).congr
(arg_eq_nhds_of_im_pos hx_im).symm]
#align complex.continuous_at_arg Complex.continuousAt_arg
theorem tendsto_arg_nhdsWithin_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0)
(him : z.im = 0) : Tendsto arg (𝓝[{ z : ℂ | z.im < 0 }] z) (𝓝 (-π)) := by
suffices H : Tendsto (fun x : ℂ => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) - π)
(𝓝[{ z : ℂ | z.im < 0 }] z) (𝓝 (-π)) by
refine H.congr' ?_
have : ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 z, x.re < 0 := continuous_re.tendsto z (gt_mem_nhds hre)
-- Porting note: need to specify the `nhdsWithin` set
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := { z : ℂ | z.im < 0 }),
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds this] with _ him hre
rw [arg, if_neg hre.not_le, if_neg him.not_le]
convert (Real.continuousAt_arcsin.comp_continuousWithinAt
((continuous_im.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt continuousWithinAt_neg).div
-- Porting note: added type hint to assist in goal state below
continuous_abs.continuousWithinAt (s := { z : ℂ | z.im < 0 }) (_ : abs z ≠ 0))
-- Porting note: specify constant precisely to assist in goal below
).sub_const π using 1
· simp [him]
· lift z to ℝ using him
simpa using hre.ne
#align complex.tendsto_arg_nhds_within_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero Complex.tendsto_arg_nhdsWithin_im_neg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
theorem continuousWithinAt_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0) (him : z.im = 0) :
ContinuousWithinAt arg { z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im } z := by
have : arg =ᶠ[𝓝[{ z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im }] z] fun x => Real.arcsin ((-x).im / abs x) + π := by
have : ∀ᶠ x : ℂ in 𝓝 z, x.re < 0 := continuous_re.tendsto z (gt_mem_nhds hre)
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin (s := { z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im }),
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds this] with _ him hre
rw [arg, if_neg hre.not_le, if_pos him]
refine ContinuousWithinAt.congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ this ?_
· refine
(Real.continuousAt_arcsin.comp_continuousWithinAt
((continuous_im.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt continuousWithinAt_neg).div
continuous_abs.continuousWithinAt ?_)).add
tendsto_const_nhds
lift z to ℝ using him
simpa using hre.ne
· rw [arg, if_neg hre.not_le, if_pos him.ge]
#align complex.continuous_within_at_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero Complex.continuousWithinAt_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 681 | 684 | theorem tendsto_arg_nhdsWithin_im_nonneg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero {z : ℂ} (hre : z.re < 0)
(him : z.im = 0) : Tendsto arg (𝓝[{ z : ℂ | 0 ≤ z.im }] z) (𝓝 π) := by |
simpa only [arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩] using
(continuousWithinAt_arg_of_re_neg_of_im_zero hre him).tendsto
|
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Birthday
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Impartial
#align_import set_theory.game.nim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
noncomputable section
universe u
namespace SetTheory
open scoped PGame
namespace PGame
-- Uses `noncomputable!` to avoid `rec_fn_macro only allowed in meta definitions` VM error
noncomputable def nim : Ordinal.{u} → PGame.{u}
| o₁ =>
let f o₂ :=
have _ : Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂ < o₁ := Ordinal.typein_lt_self o₂
nim (Ordinal.typein o₁.out.r o₂)
⟨o₁.out.α, o₁.out.α, f, f⟩
termination_by o => o
#align pgame.nim SetTheory.PGame.nim
open Ordinal
theorem nim_def (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
nim o =
PGame.mk o.out.α o.out.α (fun o₂ => nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂)) fun o₂ =>
nim (Ordinal.typein (· < ·) o₂) := by
rw [nim]; rfl
#align pgame.nim_def SetTheory.PGame.nim_def
theorem leftMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).LeftMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.leftMoves_nim
theorem rightMoves_nim (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).RightMoves = o.out.α := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.rightMoves_nim
theorem moveLeft_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveLeft fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_left_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim_hEq
theorem moveRight_nim_hEq (o : Ordinal) :
have : IsWellOrder (Quotient.out o).α (· < ·) := inferInstance
HEq (nim o).moveRight fun i : o.out.α => nim (typein (· < ·) i) := by rw [nim_def]; rfl
#align pgame.move_right_nim_heq SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim_hEq
noncomputable def toLeftMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (leftMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim
noncomputable def toRightMovesNim {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ (nim o).RightMoves :=
(enumIsoOut o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (rightMoves_nim o).symm)
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves) :
↑(toLeftMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toLeftMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : (nim o).RightMoves) :
↑(toRightMovesNim.symm i) < o :=
(toRightMovesNim.symm i).prop
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim_symm_lt SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim_symm_lt
@[simp]
theorem moveLeft_nim' {o : Ordinal.{u}} (i) :
(nim o).moveLeft i = nim (toLeftMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveLeft_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_left_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim'
theorem moveLeft_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveLeft (toLeftMovesNim i) = nim i := by simp
#align pgame.move_left_nim SetTheory.PGame.moveLeft_nim
@[simp]
theorem moveRight_nim' {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight i = nim (toRightMovesNim.symm i).val :=
(congr_heq (moveRight_nim_hEq o).symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
#align pgame.move_right_nim' SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim'
theorem moveRight_nim {o : Ordinal} (i) : (nim o).moveRight (toRightMovesNim i) = nim i := by simp
#align pgame.move_right_nim SetTheory.PGame.moveRight_nim
@[elab_as_elim]
def leftMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).LeftMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).LeftMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toLeftMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toLeftMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
#align pgame.left_moves_nim_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.leftMovesNimRecOn
@[elab_as_elim]
def rightMovesNimRecOn {o : Ordinal} {P : (nim o).RightMoves → Sort*} (i : (nim o).RightMoves)
(H : ∀ a (H : a < o), P <| toRightMovesNim ⟨a, H⟩) : P i := by
rw [← toRightMovesNim.apply_symm_apply i]; apply H
#align pgame.right_moves_nim_rec_on SetTheory.PGame.rightMovesNimRecOn
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).LeftMoves := by
rw [nim_def]
exact Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
#align pgame.is_empty_nim_zero_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_nim_zero_leftMoves
instance isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves : IsEmpty (nim 0).RightMoves := by
rw [nim_def]
exact Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
#align pgame.is_empty_nim_zero_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.isEmpty_nim_zero_rightMoves
def nimZeroRelabelling : nim 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
#align pgame.nim_zero_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.nimZeroRelabelling
theorem nim_zero_equiv : nim 0 ≈ 0 :=
Equiv.isEmpty _
#align pgame.nim_zero_equiv SetTheory.PGame.nim_zero_equiv
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneLeftMoves : Unique (nim 1).LeftMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| leftMoves_nim 1).unique
#align pgame.unique_nim_one_left_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueNimOneLeftMoves
noncomputable instance uniqueNimOneRightMoves : Unique (nim 1).RightMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| rightMoves_nim 1).unique
#align pgame.unique_nim_one_right_moves SetTheory.PGame.uniqueNimOneRightMoves
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).LeftMoves) = @toLeftMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
#align pgame.default_nim_one_left_moves_eq SetTheory.PGame.default_nim_one_leftMoves_eq
@[simp]
theorem default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq :
(default : (nim 1).RightMoves) = @toRightMovesNim 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
#align pgame.default_nim_one_right_moves_eq SetTheory.PGame.default_nim_one_rightMoves_eq
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toLeftMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align pgame.to_left_moves_nim_one_symm SetTheory.PGame.toLeftMovesNim_one_symm
@[simp]
theorem toRightMovesNim_one_symm (i) :
(@toRightMovesNim 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align pgame.to_right_moves_nim_one_symm SetTheory.PGame.toRightMovesNim_one_symm
theorem nim_one_moveLeft (x) : (nim 1).moveLeft x = nim 0 := by simp
#align pgame.nim_one_move_left SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_moveLeft
theorem nim_one_moveRight (x) : (nim 1).moveRight x = nim 0 := by simp
#align pgame.nim_one_move_right SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_moveRight
def nimOneRelabelling : nim 1 ≡r star := by
rw [nim_def]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun i => ?_, fun j => ?_⟩
any_goals dsimp; apply Equiv.equivOfUnique
all_goals simp; exact nimZeroRelabelling
#align pgame.nim_one_relabelling SetTheory.PGame.nimOneRelabelling
theorem nim_one_equiv : nim 1 ≈ star :=
nimOneRelabelling.equiv
#align pgame.nim_one_equiv SetTheory.PGame.nim_one_equiv
@[simp]
theorem nim_birthday (o : Ordinal) : (nim o).birthday = o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim_def, birthday_def]
dsimp
rw [max_eq_right le_rfl]
convert lsub_typein o with i
exact IH _ (typein_lt_self i)
#align pgame.nim_birthday SetTheory.PGame.nim_birthday
@[simp]
theorem neg_nim (o : Ordinal) : -nim o = nim o := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [nim_def]; dsimp; congr <;> funext i <;> exact IH _ (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i)
#align pgame.neg_nim SetTheory.PGame.neg_nim
instance nim_impartial (o : Ordinal) : Impartial (nim o) := by
induction' o using Ordinal.induction with o IH
rw [impartial_def, neg_nim]
refine ⟨equiv_rfl, fun i => ?_, fun i => ?_⟩ <;> simpa using IH _ (typein_lt_self _)
#align pgame.nim_impartial SetTheory.PGame.nim_impartial
theorem nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : nim o ‖ 0 := by
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_lf, nim_def, lf_zero_le]
rw [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] at ho
exact ⟨(Ordinal.principalSegOut ho).top, by simp⟩
#align pgame.nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero SetTheory.PGame.nim_fuzzy_zero_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_equiv_zero_iff (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : (nim o₁ + nim o₂ ≈ 0) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
constructor
· refine not_imp_not.1 fun hne : _ ≠ _ => (Impartial.not_equiv_zero_iff (nim o₁ + nim o₂)).2 ?_
wlog h : o₁ < o₂
· exact (fuzzy_congr_left add_comm_equiv).1 (this _ _ hne.symm (hne.lt_or_lt.resolve_left h))
rw [Impartial.fuzzy_zero_iff_gf, zero_lf_le, nim_def o₂]
refine ⟨toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inr ?_), ?_⟩
· exact (Ordinal.principalSegOut h).top
· -- Porting note: squeezed simp
simpa only [Ordinal.typein_top, Ordinal.type_lt, PGame.add_moveLeft_inr, PGame.moveLeft_mk]
using (Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)).2
· rintro rfl
exact Impartial.add_self (nim o₁)
#align pgame.nim_add_equiv_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.nim_add_equiv_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : nim o₁ + nim o₂ ‖ 0 ↔ o₁ ≠ o₂ := by
rw [iff_not_comm, Impartial.not_fuzzy_zero_iff, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
#align pgame.nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff SetTheory.PGame.nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem nim_equiv_iff_eq {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : (nim o₁ ≈ nim o₂) ↔ o₁ = o₂ := by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, nim_add_equiv_zero_iff]
#align pgame.nim_equiv_iff_eq SetTheory.PGame.nim_equiv_iff_eq
noncomputable def grundyValue : PGame.{u} → Ordinal.{u}
| G => Ordinal.mex.{u, u} fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)
termination_by G => G
#align pgame.grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_mex_left (G : PGame) :
grundyValue G = Ordinal.mex.{u, u} fun i => grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) := by rw [grundyValue]
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_mex_left SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_mex_left
theorem equiv_nim_grundyValue : ∀ (G : PGame.{u}) [G.Impartial], G ≈ nim (grundyValue G)
| G => by
rw [Impartial.equiv_iff_add_equiv_zero, ← Impartial.forall_leftMoves_fuzzy_iff_equiv_zero]
intro i
apply leftMoves_add_cases i
· intro i₁
rw [add_moveLeft_inl]
apply
(fuzzy_congr_left (add_congr_left (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue (G.moveLeft i₁))))).1
rw [nim_add_fuzzy_zero_iff]
intro heq
rw [eq_comm, grundyValue_eq_mex_left G] at heq
-- Porting note: added universe annotation, argument
have h := Ordinal.ne_mex.{u, u} (fun i ↦ grundyValue (moveLeft G i))
rw [heq] at h
exact (h i₁).irrefl
· intro i₂
rw [add_moveLeft_inr, ← Impartial.exists_left_move_equiv_iff_fuzzy_zero]
revert i₂
rw [nim_def]
intro i₂
have h' :
∃ i : G.LeftMoves,
grundyValue (G.moveLeft i) = Ordinal.typein (Quotient.out (grundyValue G)).r i₂ := by
revert i₂
rw [grundyValue_eq_mex_left]
intro i₂
have hnotin : _ ∉ _ := fun hin =>
(le_not_le_of_lt (Ordinal.typein_lt_self i₂)).2 (csInf_le' hin)
simpa using hnotin
cases' h' with i hi
use toLeftMovesAdd (Sum.inl i)
rw [add_moveLeft_inl, moveLeft_mk]
apply Equiv.trans (add_congr_left (equiv_nim_grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)))
simpa only [hi] using Impartial.add_self (nim (grundyValue (G.moveLeft i)))
termination_by G => G
decreasing_by all_goals pgame_wf_tac
#align pgame.equiv_nim_grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.equiv_nim_grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim {G : PGame} [G.Impartial] {o : Ordinal} :
grundyValue G = o ↔ (G ≈ nim o) :=
⟨by rintro rfl; exact equiv_nim_grundyValue G,
by intro h; rw [← nim_equiv_iff_eq]; exact Equiv.trans (Equiv.symm (equiv_nim_grundyValue G)) h⟩
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_iff_equiv_nim SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim
@[simp]
theorem nim_grundyValue (o : Ordinal.{u}) : grundyValue (nim o) = o :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 PGame.equiv_rfl
#align pgame.nim_grundy_value SetTheory.PGame.nim_grundyValue
theorem grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv (G H : PGame) [G.Impartial] [H.Impartial] :
grundyValue G = grundyValue H ↔ (G ≈ H) :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.trans (equiv_congr_left.1 (equiv_nim_grundyValue H) _).symm
#align pgame.grundy_value_eq_iff_equiv SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_zero : grundyValue 0 = 0 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_zero_equiv)
#align pgame.grundy_value_zero SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_zero
theorem grundyValue_iff_equiv_zero (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue G = 0 ↔ (G ≈ 0) := by
rw [← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv, grundyValue_zero]
#align pgame.grundy_value_iff_equiv_zero SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_iff_equiv_zero
@[simp]
theorem grundyValue_star : grundyValue star = 1 :=
grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim.2 (Equiv.symm nim_one_equiv)
#align pgame.grundy_value_star SetTheory.PGame.grundyValue_star
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Nim.lean | 342 | 343 | theorem grundyValue_neg (G : PGame) [G.Impartial] : grundyValue (-G) = grundyValue G := by |
rw [grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim, neg_equiv_iff, neg_nim, ← grundyValue_eq_iff_equiv_nim]
|
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.Lie
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.DerivationBundle
#align_import geometry.manifold.algebra.left_invariant_derivation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b608348ffaeb7f557f2fd46876037abafd326ff3"
noncomputable section
open scoped LieGroup Manifold Derivation
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (G : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace G] [ChartedSpace H G] [Monoid G] [SmoothMul I G] (g h : G)
-- Generate trivial has_sizeof instance. It prevents weird type class inference timeout problems
-- Porting note(#12096): removed @[nolint instance_priority], linter not ported yet
-- @[local nolint instance_priority, local instance 10000]
-- private def disable_has_sizeof {α} : SizeOf α :=
-- ⟨fun _ => 0⟩
structure LeftInvariantDerivation extends Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ where
left_invariant'' :
∀ g, 𝒅ₕ (smoothLeftMul_one I g) (Derivation.evalAt 1 toDerivation) =
Derivation.evalAt g toDerivation
#align left_invariant_derivation LeftInvariantDerivation
variable {I G}
namespace LeftInvariantDerivation
instance : Coe (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) (Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) :=
⟨toDerivation⟩
attribute [coe] toDerivation
theorem toDerivation_injective :
Function.Injective (toDerivation : LeftInvariantDerivation I G → _) :=
fun X Y h => by cases X; cases Y; congr
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_derivation_injective LeftInvariantDerivation.toDerivation_injective
instance : FunLike (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ where
coe f := f.toDerivation
coe_injective' _ _ h := toDerivation_injective <| DFunLike.ext' h
instance : LinearMapClass (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ where
map_add f := map_add f.1
map_smulₛₗ f := map_smul f.1.1
variable {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] {x : M} {r : 𝕜}
{X Y : LeftInvariantDerivation I G} {f f' : C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯}
theorem toFun_eq_coe : X.toFun = ⇑X :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.to_fun_eq_coe LeftInvariantDerivation.toFun_eq_coe
#noalign left_invariant_derivation.coe_to_linear_map
-- Porting note: now LHS is the same as RHS
#noalign left_invariant_derivation.to_derivation_eq_coe
theorem coe_injective :
@Function.Injective (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) (_ → C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) DFunLike.coe :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_injective LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_injective
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ f, X f = Y f) : X = Y := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align left_invariant_derivation.ext LeftInvariantDerivation.ext
variable (X Y f)
theorem coe_derivation :
⇑(X : Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) = (X : C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ → C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_derivation LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_derivation
theorem left_invariant' :
𝒅ₕ (smoothLeftMul_one I g) (Derivation.evalAt (1 : G) ↑X) = Derivation.evalAt g ↑X :=
left_invariant'' X g
#align left_invariant_derivation.left_invariant' LeftInvariantDerivation.left_invariant'
-- Porting note: was `@[simp]` but `_root_.map_add` can prove it now
protected theorem map_add : X (f + f') = X f + X f' := map_add X f f'
#align left_invariant_derivation.map_add LeftInvariantDerivation.map_add
-- Porting note: was `@[simp]` but `_root_.map_zero` can prove it now
protected theorem map_zero : X 0 = 0 := map_zero X
#align left_invariant_derivation.map_zero LeftInvariantDerivation.map_zero
-- Porting note: was `@[simp]` but `_root_.map_neg` can prove it now
protected theorem map_neg : X (-f) = -X f := map_neg X f
#align left_invariant_derivation.map_neg LeftInvariantDerivation.map_neg
-- Porting note: was `@[simp]` but `_root_.map_sub` can prove it now
protected theorem map_sub : X (f - f') = X f - X f' := map_sub X f f'
#align left_invariant_derivation.map_sub LeftInvariantDerivation.map_sub
-- Porting note: was `@[simp]` but `_root_.map_smul` can prove it now
protected theorem map_smul : X (r • f) = r • X f := map_smul X r f
#align left_invariant_derivation.map_smul LeftInvariantDerivation.map_smul
@[simp]
theorem leibniz : X (f * f') = f • X f' + f' • X f :=
X.leibniz' _ _
#align left_invariant_derivation.leibniz LeftInvariantDerivation.leibniz
instance : Zero (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) :=
⟨⟨0, fun g => by simp only [_root_.map_zero]⟩⟩
instance : Inhabited (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Add (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
add X Y :=
⟨X + Y, fun g => by
simp only [map_add, Derivation.coe_add, left_invariant', Pi.add_apply]⟩
instance : Neg (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
neg X := ⟨-X, fun g => by simp [left_invariant']⟩
instance : Sub (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
sub X Y := ⟨X - Y, fun g => by simp [left_invariant']⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_add : ⇑(X + Y) = X + Y :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_add LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : LeftInvariantDerivation I G) = 0 :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_zero LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg : ⇑(-X) = -X :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_neg LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub : ⇑(X - Y) = X - Y :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_sub LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lift_add : (↑(X + Y) : Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) = X + Y :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.lift_add LeftInvariantDerivation.lift_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lift_zero :
(↑(0 : LeftInvariantDerivation I G) : Derivation 𝕜 C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯) = 0 :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.lift_zero LeftInvariantDerivation.lift_zero
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
smul r X := ⟨r • X.1, fun g => by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower _ r, left_invariant']⟩
#align left_invariant_derivation.has_nat_scalar LeftInvariantDerivation.hasNatScalar
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
smul r X := ⟨r • X.1, fun g => by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower _ r, left_invariant']⟩
#align left_invariant_derivation.has_int_scalar LeftInvariantDerivation.hasIntScalar
instance : AddCommGroup (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) :=
coe_injective.addCommGroup _ coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance : SMul 𝕜 (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) where
smul r X := ⟨r • X.1, fun g => by simp_rw [LinearMap.map_smul, left_invariant']⟩
variable (r)
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul : ⇑(r • X) = r • ⇑X :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_smul LeftInvariantDerivation.coe_smul
@[simp]
theorem lift_smul (k : 𝕜) : (k • X).1 = k • X.1 :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.lift_smul LeftInvariantDerivation.lift_smul
variable (I G)
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : LeftInvariantDerivation I G →+ C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ → C^∞⟮I, G; 𝕜⟯ :=
⟨⟨DFunLike.coe, coe_zero⟩, coe_add⟩
#align left_invariant_derivation.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom LeftInvariantDerivation.coeFnAddMonoidHom
variable {I G}
instance : Module 𝕜 (LeftInvariantDerivation I G) :=
coe_injective.module _ (coeFnAddMonoidHom I G) coe_smul
def evalAt : LeftInvariantDerivation I G →ₗ[𝕜] PointDerivation I g where
toFun X := Derivation.evalAt g X.1
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.eval_at LeftInvariantDerivation.evalAt
theorem evalAt_apply : evalAt g X f = (X f) g :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.eval_at_apply LeftInvariantDerivation.evalAt_apply
@[simp]
theorem evalAt_coe : Derivation.evalAt g ↑X = evalAt g X :=
rfl
#align left_invariant_derivation.eval_at_coe LeftInvariantDerivation.evalAt_coe
theorem left_invariant : 𝒅ₕ (smoothLeftMul_one I g) (evalAt (1 : G) X) = evalAt g X :=
X.left_invariant'' g
#align left_invariant_derivation.left_invariant LeftInvariantDerivation.left_invariant
theorem evalAt_mul : evalAt (g * h) X = 𝒅ₕ (L_apply I g h) (evalAt h X) := by
ext f
rw [← left_invariant, apply_hfdifferential, apply_hfdifferential, L_mul, fdifferential_comp,
apply_fdifferential]
-- Porting note: more agressive here
erw [LinearMap.comp_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [apply_fdifferential, ← apply_hfdifferential, left_invariant]
#align left_invariant_derivation.eval_at_mul LeftInvariantDerivation.evalAt_mul
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/Algebra/LeftInvariantDerivation.lean | 249 | 252 | theorem comp_L : (X f).comp (𝑳 I g) = X (f.comp (𝑳 I g)) := by |
ext h
rw [ContMDiffMap.comp_apply, L_apply, ← evalAt_apply, evalAt_mul, apply_hfdifferential,
apply_fdifferential, evalAt_apply]
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
#align list.length_enum_from List.enumFrom_length
#align list.length_enum List.enum_length
@[simp]
theorem get?_enumFrom :
∀ n (l : List α) m, get? (enumFrom n l) m = (get? l m).map fun a => (n + m, a)
| n, [], m => rfl
| n, a :: l, 0 => rfl
| n, a :: l, m + 1 => (get?_enumFrom (n + 1) l m).trans <| by rw [Nat.add_right_comm]; rfl
#align list.enum_from_nth List.get?_enumFrom
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")] alias enumFrom_get? := get?_enumFrom
@[simp]
theorem get?_enum (l : List α) (n) : get? (enum l) n = (get? l n).map fun a => (n, a) := by
rw [enum, get?_enumFrom, Nat.zero_add]
#align list.enum_nth List.get?_enum
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-06")] alias enum_get? := get?_enum
@[simp]
theorem enumFrom_map_snd : ∀ (n) (l : List α), map Prod.snd (enumFrom n l) = l
| _, [] => rfl
| _, _ :: _ => congr_arg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_snd _ _)
#align list.enum_from_map_snd List.enumFrom_map_snd
@[simp]
theorem enum_map_snd (l : List α) : map Prod.snd (enum l) = l :=
enumFrom_map_snd _ _
#align list.enum_map_snd List.enum_map_snd
@[simp]
theorem get_enumFrom (l : List α) (n) (i : Fin (l.enumFrom n).length) :
(l.enumFrom n).get i = (n + i, l.get (i.cast enumFrom_length)) := by
simp [get_eq_get?]
#align list.nth_le_enum_from List.get_enumFrom
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (l : List α) (i : Fin l.enum.length) :
l.enum.get i = (i.1, l.get (i.cast enum_length)) := by
simp [enum]
#align list.nth_le_enum List.get_enum
theorem mk_add_mem_enumFrom_iff_get? {n i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} :
(n + i, x) ∈ enumFrom n l ↔ l.get? i = x := by
simp [mem_iff_get?]
theorem mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub {n i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} :
(i, x) ∈ enumFrom n l ↔ n ≤ i ∧ l.get? (i - n) = x := by
if h : n ≤ i then
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨i, rfl⟩
simp [mk_add_mem_enumFrom_iff_get?, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
else
have : ∀ k, n + k ≠ i := by rintro k rfl; simp at h
simp [h, mem_iff_get?, this]
theorem mk_mem_enum_iff_get? {i : ℕ} {x : α} {l : List α} : (i, x) ∈ enum l ↔ l.get? i = x := by
simp [enum, mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub]
theorem mem_enum_iff_get? {x : ℕ × α} {l : List α} : x ∈ enum l ↔ l.get? x.1 = x.2 :=
mk_mem_enum_iff_get?
theorem le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom {x : ℕ × α} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) :
n ≤ x.1 :=
(mk_mem_enumFrom_iff_le_and_get?_sub.1 h).1
theorem fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom {x : ℕ × α} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) :
x.1 < n + length l := by
rcases mem_iff_get.1 h with ⟨i, rfl⟩
simpa using i.is_lt
theorem fst_lt_of_mem_enum {x : ℕ × α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enum l) : x.1 < length l := by
simpa using fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h
theorem snd_mem_of_mem_enumFrom {x : ℕ × α} {n : ℕ} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enumFrom n l) : x.2 ∈ l :=
enumFrom_map_snd n l ▸ mem_map_of_mem _ h
theorem snd_mem_of_mem_enum {x : ℕ × α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ enum l) : x.2 ∈ l :=
snd_mem_of_mem_enumFrom h
theorem mem_enumFrom {x : α} {i j : ℕ} (xs : List α) (h : (i, x) ∈ xs.enumFrom j) :
j ≤ i ∧ i < j + xs.length ∧ x ∈ xs :=
⟨le_fst_of_mem_enumFrom h, fst_lt_add_of_mem_enumFrom h, snd_mem_of_mem_enumFrom h⟩
#align list.mem_enum_from List.mem_enumFrom
@[simp]
theorem enum_nil : enum ([] : List α) = [] :=
rfl
#align list.enum_nil List.enum_nil
#align list.enum_from_nil List.enumFrom_nil
#align list.enum_from_cons List.enumFrom_cons
@[simp]
theorem enum_cons (x : α) (xs : List α) : enum (x :: xs) = (0, x) :: enumFrom 1 xs :=
rfl
#align list.enum_cons List.enum_cons
@[simp]
theorem enumFrom_singleton (x : α) (n : ℕ) : enumFrom n [x] = [(n, x)] :=
rfl
#align list.enum_from_singleton List.enumFrom_singleton
@[simp]
theorem enum_singleton (x : α) : enum [x] = [(0, x)] :=
rfl
#align list.enum_singleton List.enum_singleton
theorem enumFrom_append (xs ys : List α) (n : ℕ) :
enumFrom n (xs ++ ys) = enumFrom n xs ++ enumFrom (n + xs.length) ys := by
induction' xs with x xs IH generalizing ys n
· simp
· rw [cons_append, enumFrom_cons, IH, ← cons_append, ← enumFrom_cons, length, Nat.add_right_comm,
Nat.add_assoc]
#align list.enum_from_append List.enumFrom_append
theorem enum_append (xs ys : List α) : enum (xs ++ ys) = enum xs ++ enumFrom xs.length ys := by
simp [enum, enumFrom_append]
#align list.enum_append List.enum_append
theorem map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n k : ℕ) :
map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enumFrom k l) = enumFrom (n + k) l :=
ext_get? fun i ↦ by simp [(· ∘ ·), Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_left_comm]
#align list.map_fst_add_enum_from_eq_enum_from List.map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom
theorem map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom (l : List α) (n : ℕ) :
map (Prod.map (· + n) id) (enum l) = enumFrom n l :=
map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom l _ _
#align list.map_fst_add_enum_eq_enum_from List.map_fst_add_enum_eq_enumFrom
| Mathlib/Data/List/Enum.lean | 146 | 148 | theorem enumFrom_cons' (n : ℕ) (x : α) (xs : List α) :
enumFrom n (x :: xs) = (n, x) :: (enumFrom n xs).map (Prod.map Nat.succ id) := by |
rw [enumFrom_cons, Nat.add_comm, ← map_fst_add_enumFrom_eq_enumFrom]
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Monotone
#align_import topology.algebra.order.left_right_lim from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"0a0ec35061ed9960bf0e7ffb0335f44447b58977"
open Set Filter
open Topology
section
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace β]
noncomputable def Function.leftLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β := by
classical
haveI : Nonempty β := ⟨f a⟩
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
exact if 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ ∨ ¬∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) then f a else limUnder (𝓝[<] a) f
#align function.left_lim Function.leftLim
noncomputable def Function.rightLim (f : α → β) (a : α) : β :=
@Function.leftLim αᵒᵈ β _ _ f a
#align function.right_lim Function.rightLim
open Function
theorem leftLim_eq_of_tendsto [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] [T2Space β]
{f : α → β} {a : α} {y : β} (h : 𝓝[<] a ≠ ⊥) (h' : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y)) :
leftLim f a = y := by
have h'' : ∃ y, Tendsto f (𝓝[<] a) (𝓝 y) := ⟨y, h'⟩
rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h h' h''
simp only [leftLim, h, h'', not_true, or_self_iff, if_false]
haveI := neBot_iff.2 h
exact lim_eq h'
#align left_lim_eq_of_tendsto leftLim_eq_of_tendsto
theorem leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot [hα : TopologicalSpace α] [h'α : OrderTopology α] (f : α → β) {a : α}
(h : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥) : leftLim f a = f a := by
rw [h'α.topology_eq_generate_intervals] at h
simp [leftLim, ite_eq_left_iff, h]
#align left_lim_eq_of_eq_bot leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot
theorem rightLim_eq_of_tendsto [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] [T2Space β]
{f : α → β} {a : α} {y : β} (h : 𝓝[>] a ≠ ⊥) (h' : Tendsto f (𝓝[>] a) (𝓝 y)) :
Function.rightLim f a = y :=
@leftLim_eq_of_tendsto αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ _ f a y h h'
#align right_lim_eq_of_tendsto rightLim_eq_of_tendsto
theorem rightLim_eq_of_eq_bot [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (f : α → β) {a : α}
(h : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥) : rightLim f a = f a :=
@leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ _ f a h
end
open Function
namespace Monotone
variable {α β : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[OrderTopology β] {f : α → β} (hf : Monotone f) {x y : α}
theorem leftLim_eq_sSup [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (h : 𝓝[<] x ≠ ⊥) :
leftLim f x = sSup (f '' Iio x) :=
leftLim_eq_of_tendsto h (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Iio x)
#align monotone.left_lim_eq_Sup Monotone.leftLim_eq_sSup
theorem rightLim_eq_sInf [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α] (h : 𝓝[>] x ≠ ⊥) :
rightLim f x = sInf (f '' Ioi x) :=
rightLim_eq_of_tendsto h (hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Ioi x)
#align right_lim_eq_Inf Monotone.rightLim_eq_sInf
theorem leftLim_le (h : x ≤ y) : leftLim f x ≤ f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] x) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simpa [leftLim, h'] using hf h
haveI A : NeBot (𝓝[<] x) := neBot_iff.2 h'
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
refine csSup_le ?_ ?_
· simp only [image_nonempty]
exact (forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 A) _ self_mem_nhdsWithin
· simp only [mem_image, mem_Iio, forall_exists_index, and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂]
intro z hz
exact hf (hz.le.trans h)
#align monotone.left_lim_le Monotone.leftLim_le
theorem le_leftLim (h : x < y) : f x ≤ leftLim f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] y) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· rw [leftLim_eq_of_eq_bot _ h']
exact hf h.le
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
refine le_csSup ⟨f y, ?_⟩ (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
simp only [upperBounds, mem_image, mem_Iio, forall_exists_index, and_imp,
forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂, mem_setOf_eq]
intro z hz
exact hf hz.le
#align monotone.le_left_lim Monotone.le_leftLim
@[mono]
protected theorem leftLim : Monotone (leftLim f) := by
intro x y h
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h with (rfl | hxy)
· exact le_rfl
· exact (hf.leftLim_le le_rfl).trans (hf.le_leftLim hxy)
#align monotone.left_lim Monotone.leftLim
theorem le_rightLim (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ rightLim f y :=
hf.dual.leftLim_le h
#align monotone.le_right_lim Monotone.le_rightLim
theorem rightLim_le (h : x < y) : rightLim f x ≤ f y :=
hf.dual.le_leftLim h
#align monotone.right_lim_le Monotone.rightLim_le
@[mono]
protected theorem rightLim : Monotone (rightLim f) := fun _ _ h => hf.dual.leftLim h
#align monotone.right_lim Monotone.rightLim
theorem leftLim_le_rightLim (h : x ≤ y) : leftLim f x ≤ rightLim f y :=
(hf.leftLim_le le_rfl).trans (hf.le_rightLim h)
#align monotone.left_lim_le_right_lim Monotone.leftLim_le_rightLim
theorem rightLim_le_leftLim (h : x < y) : rightLim f x ≤ leftLim f y := by
letI : TopologicalSpace α := Preorder.topology α
haveI : OrderTopology α := ⟨rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] y) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simp [leftLim, h']
exact rightLim_le hf h
obtain ⟨a, ⟨xa, ay⟩⟩ : (Ioo x y).Nonempty :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.2 (neBot_iff.2 h') (Ioo x y)
(Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio ⟨h, le_refl _⟩)
calc
rightLim f x ≤ f a := hf.rightLim_le xa
_ ≤ leftLim f y := hf.le_leftLim ay
#align monotone.right_lim_le_left_lim Monotone.rightLim_le_leftLim
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderTopology α]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/LeftRightLim.lean | 179 | 183 | theorem tendsto_leftLim (x : α) : Tendsto f (𝓝[<] x) (𝓝 (leftLim f x)) := by |
rcases eq_or_ne (𝓝[<] x) ⊥ with (h' | h')
· simp [h']
rw [leftLim_eq_sSup hf h']
exact hf.tendsto_nhdsWithin_Iio x
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Chain
#align_import data.list.destutter from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7b78d1776212a91ecc94cf601f83bdcc46b04213"
variable {α : Type*} (l : List α) (R : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel R] {a b : α}
namespace List
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_nil : destutter' R a [] = [a] :=
rfl
#align list.destutter'_nil List.destutter'_nil
theorem destutter'_cons :
(b :: l).destutter' R a = if R a b then a :: destutter' R b l else destutter' R a l :=
rfl
#align list.destutter'_cons List.destutter'_cons
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_cons_pos (h : R b a) : (a :: l).destutter' R b = b :: l.destutter' R a := by
rw [destutter', if_pos h]
#align list.destutter'_cons_pos List.destutter'_cons_pos
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_cons_neg (h : ¬R b a) : (a :: l).destutter' R b = l.destutter' R b := by
rw [destutter', if_neg h]
#align list.destutter'_cons_neg List.destutter'_cons_neg
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem destutter'_singleton : [b].destutter' R a = if R a b then [a, b] else [a] := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp! [h]
#align list.destutter'_singleton List.destutter'_singleton
theorem destutter'_sublist (a) : l.destutter' R a <+ a :: l := by
induction' l with b l hl generalizing a
· simp
rw [destutter']
split_ifs
· exact Sublist.cons₂ a (hl b)
· exact (hl a).trans ((l.sublist_cons b).cons_cons a)
#align list.destutter'_sublist List.destutter'_sublist
| Mathlib/Data/List/Destutter.lean | 73 | 79 | theorem mem_destutter' (a) : a ∈ l.destutter' R a := by |
induction' l with b l hl
· simp
rw [destutter']
split_ifs
· simp
· assumption
|
import Mathlib.Data.Opposite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
#align_import data.set.opposite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fc2ed6f838ce7c9b7c7171e58d78eaf7b438fb0e"
variable {α : Type*}
open Opposite
namespace Set
protected def op (s : Set α) : Set αᵒᵖ :=
unop ⁻¹' s
#align set.op Set.op
protected def unop (s : Set αᵒᵖ) : Set α :=
op ⁻¹' s
#align set.unop Set.unop
@[simp]
theorem mem_op {s : Set α} {a : αᵒᵖ} : a ∈ s.op ↔ unop a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_op Set.mem_op
@[simp 1100]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Opposite.lean | 39 | 39 | theorem op_mem_op {s : Set α} {a : α} : op a ∈ s.op ↔ a ∈ s := by | rfl
|
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
#align_import data.list.to_finsupp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"06a655b5fcfbda03502f9158bbf6c0f1400886f9"
namespace List
variable {M : Type*} [Zero M] (l : List M) [DecidablePred (getD l · 0 ≠ 0)] (n : ℕ)
def toFinsupp : ℕ →₀ M where
toFun i := getD l i 0
support := (Finset.range l.length).filter fun i => getD l i 0 ≠ 0
mem_support_toFun n := by
simp only [Ne, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_range, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
contrapose!
exact getD_eq_default _ _
#align list.to_finsupp List.toFinsupp
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_toFinsupp : (l.toFinsupp : ℕ → M) = (l.getD · 0) :=
rfl
#align list.coe_to_finsupp List.coe_toFinsupp
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem toFinsupp_apply (i : ℕ) : (l.toFinsupp : ℕ → M) i = l.getD i 0 :=
rfl
#align list.to_finsupp_apply List.toFinsupp_apply
theorem toFinsupp_support :
l.toFinsupp.support = (Finset.range l.length).filter (getD l · 0 ≠ 0) :=
rfl
#align list.to_finsupp_support List.toFinsupp_support
theorem toFinsupp_apply_lt (hn : n < l.length) : l.toFinsupp n = l.get ⟨n, hn⟩ :=
getD_eq_get _ _ _
theorem toFinsupp_apply_fin (n : Fin l.length) : l.toFinsupp n = l.get n :=
getD_eq_get _ _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated (since := "2023-04-10")]
theorem toFinsupp_apply_lt' (hn : n < l.length) : l.toFinsupp n = l.nthLe n hn :=
getD_eq_get _ _ _
#align list.to_finsupp_apply_lt List.toFinsupp_apply_lt'
theorem toFinsupp_apply_le (hn : l.length ≤ n) : l.toFinsupp n = 0 :=
getD_eq_default _ _ hn
#align list.to_finsupp_apply_le List.toFinsupp_apply_le
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_nil [DecidablePred fun i => getD ([] : List M) i 0 ≠ 0] :
toFinsupp ([] : List M) = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align list.to_finsupp_nil List.toFinsupp_nil
theorem toFinsupp_singleton (x : M) [DecidablePred (getD [x] · 0 ≠ 0)] :
toFinsupp [x] = Finsupp.single 0 x := by
ext ⟨_ | i⟩ <;> simp [Finsupp.single_apply, (Nat.zero_lt_succ _).ne]
#align list.to_finsupp_singleton List.toFinsupp_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_cons_apply_zero (x : M) (xs : List M)
[DecidablePred (getD (x::xs) · 0 ≠ 0)] : (x::xs).toFinsupp 0 = x :=
rfl
#align list.to_finsupp_cons_apply_zero List.toFinsupp_cons_apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_cons_apply_succ (x : M) (xs : List M) (n : ℕ)
[DecidablePred (getD (x::xs) · 0 ≠ 0)] [DecidablePred (getD xs · 0 ≠ 0)] :
(x::xs).toFinsupp n.succ = xs.toFinsupp n :=
rfl
#align list.to_finsupp_cons_apply_succ List.toFinsupp_cons_apply_succ
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem toFinsupp_append {R : Type*} [AddZeroClass R] (l₁ l₂ : List R)
[DecidablePred (getD (l₁ ++ l₂) · 0 ≠ 0)] [DecidablePred (getD l₁ · 0 ≠ 0)]
[DecidablePred (getD l₂ · 0 ≠ 0)] :
toFinsupp (l₁ ++ l₂) =
toFinsupp l₁ + (toFinsupp l₂).embDomain (addLeftEmbedding l₁.length) := by
ext n
simp only [toFinsupp_apply, Finsupp.add_apply]
cases lt_or_le n l₁.length with
| inl h =>
rw [getD_append _ _ _ _ h, Finsupp.embDomain_notin_range, add_zero]
rintro ⟨k, rfl : length l₁ + k = n⟩
omega
| inr h =>
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [getD_append_right _ _ _ _ h, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, getD_eq_default _ _ h, zero_add]
exact Eq.symm (Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _)
theorem toFinsupp_cons_eq_single_add_embDomain {R : Type*} [AddZeroClass R] (x : R) (xs : List R)
[DecidablePred (getD (x::xs) · 0 ≠ 0)] [DecidablePred (getD xs · 0 ≠ 0)] :
toFinsupp (x::xs) =
Finsupp.single 0 x + (toFinsupp xs).embDomain ⟨Nat.succ, Nat.succ_injective⟩ := by
classical
convert toFinsupp_append [x] xs using 3
· exact (toFinsupp_singleton x).symm
· ext n
exact add_comm n 1
#align list.to_finsupp_cons_eq_single_add_emb_domain List.toFinsupp_cons_eq_single_add_embDomain
| Mathlib/Data/List/ToFinsupp.lean | 139 | 143 | theorem toFinsupp_concat_eq_toFinsupp_add_single {R : Type*} [AddZeroClass R] (x : R) (xs : List R)
[DecidablePred fun i => getD (xs ++ [x]) i 0 ≠ 0] [DecidablePred fun i => getD xs i 0 ≠ 0] :
toFinsupp (xs ++ [x]) = toFinsupp xs + Finsupp.single xs.length x := by |
classical rw [toFinsupp_append, toFinsupp_singleton, Finsupp.embDomain_single,
addLeftEmbedding_apply, add_zero]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.RealVectorSpace
#align_import analysis.normed_space.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"837f72de63ad6cd96519cde5f1ffd5ed8d280ad0"
noncomputable section
open NNReal Topology
open Filter
variable {α V P W Q : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup V] [PseudoMetricSpace P] [NormedAddTorsor V P]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [MetricSpace Q] [NormedAddTorsor W Q]
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 V] [NormedSpace 𝕜 W]
open AffineMap
theorem AffineSubspace.isClosed_direction_iff (s : AffineSubspace 𝕜 Q) :
IsClosed (s.direction : Set W) ↔ IsClosed (s : Set Q) := by
rcases s.eq_bot_or_nonempty with (rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩); · simp [isClosed_singleton]
rw [← (IsometryEquiv.vaddConst x).toHomeomorph.symm.isClosed_image,
AffineSubspace.coe_direction_eq_vsub_set_right hx]
rfl
#align affine_subspace.is_closed_direction_iff AffineSubspace.isClosed_direction_iff
@[simp]
theorem dist_center_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist p₁ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simp [homothety_def, norm_smul, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, dist_comm]
#align dist_center_homothety dist_center_homothety
@[simp]
theorem nndist_center_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₁ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_center_homothety _ _ _
#align nndist_center_homothety nndist_center_homothety
@[simp]
theorem dist_homothety_center (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₁ = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_center_homothety]
#align dist_homothety_center dist_homothety_center
@[simp]
theorem nndist_homothety_center (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₁ = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_homothety_center _ _ _
#align nndist_homothety_center nndist_homothety_center
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c₁ c₂ : 𝕜) :
dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁) (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₂) = dist c₁ c₂ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [dist_comm p₁ p₂]
simp only [lineMap_apply, dist_eq_norm_vsub, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right,
← sub_smul, norm_smul, vsub_eq_sub]
#align dist_line_map_line_map dist_lineMap_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c₁ c₂ : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁) (lineMap p₁ p₂ c₂) = nndist c₁ c₂ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_lineMap _ _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_line_map nndist_lineMap_lineMap
theorem lipschitzWith_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) : LipschitzWith (nndist p₁ p₂) (lineMap p₁ p₂ : 𝕜 → P) :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul fun c₁ c₂ =>
((dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c₁ c₂).trans (mul_comm _ _)).le
#align lipschitz_with_line_map lipschitzWith_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_left (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₁ = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simpa only [lineMap_apply_zero, dist_zero_right] using dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c 0
#align dist_line_map_left dist_lineMap_left
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_left (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₁ = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_left _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_left nndist_lineMap_left
@[simp]
theorem dist_left_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist p₁ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_lineMap_left _ _ _)
#align dist_left_line_map dist_left_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_left_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₁ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_left_lineMap _ _ _
#align nndist_left_line_map nndist_left_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_lineMap_right (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
simpa only [lineMap_apply_one, dist_eq_norm'] using dist_lineMap_lineMap p₁ p₂ c 1
#align dist_line_map_right dist_lineMap_right
@[simp]
theorem nndist_lineMap_right (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_lineMap_right _ _ _
#align nndist_line_map_right nndist_lineMap_right
@[simp]
theorem dist_right_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) : dist p₂ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_lineMap_right _ _ _)
#align dist_right_line_map dist_right_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem nndist_right_lineMap (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₂ (lineMap p₁ p₂ c) = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_right_lineMap _ _ _
#align nndist_right_line_map nndist_right_lineMap
@[simp]
theorem dist_homothety_self (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by
rw [homothety_eq_lineMap, dist_lineMap_right]
#align dist_homothety_self dist_homothety_self
@[simp]
theorem nndist_homothety_self (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist (homothety p₁ c p₂) p₂ = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_homothety_self _ _ _
#align nndist_homothety_self nndist_homothety_self
@[simp]
theorem dist_self_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
dist p₂ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖1 - c‖ * dist p₁ p₂ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_homothety_self]
#align dist_self_homothety dist_self_homothety
@[simp]
theorem nndist_self_homothety (p₁ p₂ : P) (c : 𝕜) :
nndist p₂ (homothety p₁ c p₂) = ‖1 - c‖₊ * nndist p₁ p₂ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_self_homothety _ _ _
#align nndist_self_homothety nndist_self_homothety
@[simp] theorem dist_pointReflection_left (p q : P) :
dist (Equiv.pointReflection p q) p = dist p q := by
simp [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Equiv.pointReflection_vsub_left (G := V)]
@[simp] theorem dist_left_pointReflection (p q : P) :
dist p (Equiv.pointReflection p q) = dist p q :=
(dist_comm _ _).trans (dist_pointReflection_left _ _)
variable (𝕜) in
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/AddTorsor.lean | 227 | 230 | theorem dist_pointReflection_right (p q : P) :
dist (Equiv.pointReflection p q) q = ‖(2 : 𝕜)‖ * dist p q := by |
simp [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, Equiv.pointReflection_vsub_right (G := V),
nsmul_eq_smul_cast 𝕜, norm_smul]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.EqLocus
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Idempotents
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompactlyGenerated.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.OmegaCompletePartialOrder
#align_import linear_algebra.span from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10878f6bf1dab863445907ab23fbfcefcb5845d0"
variable {R R₂ K M M₂ V S : Type*}
namespace Submodule
open Function Set
open Pointwise
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {x : M} (p p' : Submodule R M)
variable [Semiring R₂] {σ₁₂ : R →+* R₂}
variable [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂] [SemilinearMapClass F σ₁₂ M M₂]
section
variable (R)
def span (s : Set M) : Submodule R M :=
sInf { p | s ⊆ p }
#align submodule.span Submodule.span
variable {R}
-- Porting note: renamed field to `principal'` and added `principal` to fix explicit argument
@[mk_iff]
class IsPrincipal (S : Submodule R M) : Prop where
principal' : ∃ a, S = span R {a}
#align submodule.is_principal Submodule.IsPrincipal
theorem IsPrincipal.principal (S : Submodule R M) [S.IsPrincipal] :
∃ a, S = span R {a} :=
Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal'
#align submodule.is_principal.principal Submodule.IsPrincipal.principal
end
variable {s t : Set M}
theorem mem_span : x ∈ span R s ↔ ∀ p : Submodule R M, s ⊆ p → x ∈ p :=
mem_iInter₂
#align submodule.mem_span Submodule.mem_span
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [SetLike])]
theorem subset_span : s ⊆ span R s := fun _ h => mem_span.2 fun _ hp => hp h
#align submodule.subset_span Submodule.subset_span
theorem span_le {p} : span R s ≤ p ↔ s ⊆ p :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_span, fun ss _ h => mem_span.1 h _ ss⟩
#align submodule.span_le Submodule.span_le
theorem span_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : span R s ≤ span R t :=
span_le.2 <| Subset.trans h subset_span
#align submodule.span_mono Submodule.span_mono
theorem span_monotone : Monotone (span R : Set M → Submodule R M) := fun _ _ => span_mono
#align submodule.span_monotone Submodule.span_monotone
theorem span_eq_of_le (h₁ : s ⊆ p) (h₂ : p ≤ span R s) : span R s = p :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 h₁) h₂
#align submodule.span_eq_of_le Submodule.span_eq_of_le
theorem span_eq : span R (p : Set M) = p :=
span_eq_of_le _ (Subset.refl _) subset_span
#align submodule.span_eq Submodule.span_eq
theorem span_eq_span (hs : s ⊆ span R t) (ht : t ⊆ span R s) : span R s = span R t :=
le_antisymm (span_le.2 hs) (span_le.2 ht)
#align submodule.span_eq_span Submodule.span_eq_span
lemma coe_span_eq_self [SetLike S M] [AddSubmonoidClass S M] [SMulMemClass S R M] (s : S) :
(span R (s : Set M) : Set M) = s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ subset_span
let s' : Submodule R M :=
{ carrier := s
add_mem' := add_mem
zero_mem' := zero_mem _
smul_mem' := SMulMemClass.smul_mem }
exact span_le (p := s') |>.mpr le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem span_coe_eq_restrictScalars [Semiring S] [SMul S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
span S (p : Set M) = p.restrictScalars S :=
span_eq (p.restrictScalars S)
#align submodule.span_coe_eq_restrict_scalars Submodule.span_coe_eq_restrictScalars
theorem image_span_subset (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
f '' span R s ⊆ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_subset_iff.trans <| span_le (p := N.comap f)
theorem image_span_subset_span (f : F) (s : Set M) : f '' span R s ⊆ span R₂ (f '' s) :=
(image_span_subset f s _).2 fun x hx ↦ subset_span ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
theorem map_span [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) :
(span R s).map f = span R₂ (f '' s) :=
Eq.symm <| span_eq_of_le _ (Set.image_subset f subset_span) (image_span_subset_span f s)
#align submodule.map_span Submodule.map_span
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span := Submodule.map_span
#align linear_map.map_span LinearMap.map_span
theorem map_span_le [RingHomSurjective σ₁₂] (f : F) (s : Set M) (N : Submodule R₂ M₂) :
map f (span R s) ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ s, f m ∈ N := image_span_subset f s N
#align submodule.map_span_le Submodule.map_span_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.map_span_le := Submodule.map_span_le
#align linear_map.map_span_le LinearMap.map_span_le
@[simp]
theorem span_insert_zero : span R (insert (0 : M) s) = span R s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (Submodule.span_mono (Set.subset_insert 0 s))
rw [span_le, Set.insert_subset_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.zero_mem], Submodule.subset_span⟩
#align submodule.span_insert_zero Submodule.span_insert_zero
-- See also `span_preimage_eq` below.
theorem span_preimage_le (f : F) (s : Set M₂) :
span R (f ⁻¹' s) ≤ (span R₂ s).comap f := by
rw [span_le, comap_coe]
exact preimage_mono subset_span
#align submodule.span_preimage_le Submodule.span_preimage_le
alias _root_.LinearMap.span_preimage_le := Submodule.span_preimage_le
#align linear_map.span_preimage_le LinearMap.span_preimage_le
theorem closure_subset_span {s : Set M} : (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) ⊆ span R s :=
(@AddSubmonoid.closure_le _ _ _ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid).mpr subset_span
#align submodule.closure_subset_span Submodule.closure_subset_span
theorem closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span {s : Set M} :
AddSubmonoid.closure s ≤ (span R s).toAddSubmonoid :=
closure_subset_span
#align submodule.closure_le_to_add_submonoid_span Submodule.closure_le_toAddSubmonoid_span
@[simp]
theorem span_closure {s : Set M} : span R (AddSubmonoid.closure s : Set M) = span R s :=
le_antisymm (span_le.mpr closure_subset_span) (span_mono AddSubmonoid.subset_closure)
#align submodule.span_closure Submodule.span_closure
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (mem : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul : ∀ (a : R) (x), p x → p (a • x)) : p x :=
((@span_le (p := ⟨⟨⟨p, by intros x y; exact add x y⟩, zero⟩, smul⟩)) s).2 mem h
#align submodule.span_induction Submodule.span_induction
theorem span_induction₂ {p : M → M → Prop} {a b : M} (ha : a ∈ Submodule.span R s)
(hb : b ∈ Submodule.span R s) (mem_mem : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, p x y)
(zero_left : ∀ y, p 0 y) (zero_right : ∀ x, p x 0)
(add_left : ∀ x₁ x₂ y, p x₁ y → p x₂ y → p (x₁ + x₂) y)
(add_right : ∀ x y₁ y₂, p x y₁ → p x y₂ → p x (y₁ + y₂))
(smul_left : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p (r • x) y)
(smul_right : ∀ (r : R) x y, p x y → p x (r • y)) : p a b :=
Submodule.span_induction ha
(fun x hx => Submodule.span_induction hb (mem_mem x hx) (zero_right x) (add_right x) fun r =>
smul_right r x)
(zero_left b) (fun x₁ x₂ => add_left x₁ x₂ b) fun r x => smul_left r x b
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem span_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(mem : ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x (subset_span h))
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul : ∀ (a : R) (x hx), p x hx → p (a • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ ‹_›)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) => hc
refine
span_induction hx (fun m hm => ⟨subset_span hm, mem m hm⟩) ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy =>
Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx =>
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy => ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx => Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx => ⟨smul_mem _ _ hx', smul r _ _ hx⟩
#align submodule.span_induction' Submodule.span_induction'
open AddSubmonoid in
theorem span_eq_closure {s : Set M} : (span R s).toAddSubmonoid = closure (@univ R • s) := by
refine le_antisymm
(fun x hx ↦ span_induction hx (fun x hx ↦ subset_closure ⟨1, trivial, x, hx, one_smul R x⟩)
(zero_mem _) (fun _ _ ↦ add_mem) fun r m hm ↦ closure_induction hm ?_ ?_ fun _ _ h h' ↦ ?_)
(closure_le.2 ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hm)
· rintro _ ⟨r', -, m, hm, rfl⟩; exact subset_closure ⟨r * r', trivial, m, hm, mul_smul r r' m⟩
· rw [smul_zero]; apply zero_mem
· rw [smul_add]; exact add_mem h h'
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction {p : M → Prop} (h : x ∈ span R s) (zero : p 0)
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) (smul_mem : ∀ r : R, ∀ x ∈ s, p (r • x)) : p x := by
rw [← mem_toAddSubmonoid, span_eq_closure] at h
refine AddSubmonoid.closure_induction h ?_ zero add
rintro _ ⟨r, -, m, hm, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem r m hm
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem closure_induction' {p : ∀ x, x ∈ span R s → Prop}
(zero : p 0 (Submodule.zero_mem _))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ ‹_› ‹_›))
(smul_mem : ∀ (r x) (h : x ∈ s), p (r • x) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ <| subset_span h)) {x}
(hx : x ∈ span R s) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (hx : x ∈ span R s) (hc : p x hx) ↦ hc
refine closure_induction hx ⟨zero_mem _, zero⟩
(fun x y hx hy ↦ Exists.elim hx fun hx' hx ↦
Exists.elim hy fun hy' hy ↦ ⟨add_mem hx' hy', add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩)
fun r x hx ↦ ⟨Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (subset_span hx), smul_mem r x hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem span_span_coe_preimage : span R (((↑) : span R s → M) ⁻¹' s) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 fun x ↦ Subtype.recOn x fun x hx _ ↦ by
refine span_induction' (p := fun x hx ↦ (⟨x, hx⟩ : span R s) ∈ span R (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s))
(fun x' hx' ↦ subset_span hx') ?_ (fun x _ y _ ↦ ?_) (fun r x _ ↦ ?_) hx
· exact zero_mem _
· exact add_mem
· exact smul_mem _ _
#align submodule.span_span_coe_preimage Submodule.span_span_coe_preimage
@[simp]
lemma span_setOf_mem_eq_top :
span R {x : span R s | (x : M) ∈ s} = ⊤ :=
span_span_coe_preimage
theorem span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure (s : Set M) :
(span ℕ s).toAddSubmonoid = AddSubmonoid.closure s := by
refine Eq.symm (AddSubmonoid.closure_eq_of_le subset_span ?_)
apply (OrderIso.to_galoisConnection (AddSubmonoid.toNatSubmodule (M := M)).symm).l_le
(a := span ℕ s) (b := AddSubmonoid.closure s)
rw [span_le]
exact AddSubmonoid.subset_closure
#align submodule.span_nat_eq_add_submonoid_closure Submodule.span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_nat_eq (s : AddSubmonoid M) : (span ℕ (s : Set M)).toAddSubmonoid = s := by
rw [span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_nat_eq Submodule.span_nat_eq
theorem span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : Set M) :
(span ℤ s).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.closure s :=
Eq.symm <|
AddSubgroup.closure_eq_of_le _ subset_span fun x hx =>
span_induction hx (fun x hx => AddSubgroup.subset_closure hx) (AddSubgroup.zero_mem _)
(fun _ _ => AddSubgroup.add_mem _) fun _ _ _ => AddSubgroup.zsmul_mem _ ‹_› _
#align submodule.span_int_eq_add_subgroup_closure Submodule.span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure
@[simp]
theorem span_int_eq {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] (s : AddSubgroup M) :
(span ℤ (s : Set M)).toAddSubgroup = s := by rw [span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure, s.closure_eq]
#align submodule.span_int_eq Submodule.span_int_eq
section
variable (R M)
protected def gi : GaloisInsertion (@span R M _ _ _) (↑) where
choice s _ := span R s
gc _ _ := span_le
le_l_u _ := subset_span
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
#align submodule.gi Submodule.gi
end
@[simp]
theorem span_empty : span R (∅ : Set M) = ⊥ :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_bot
#align submodule.span_empty Submodule.span_empty
@[simp]
theorem span_univ : span R (univ : Set M) = ⊤ :=
eq_top_iff.2 <| SetLike.le_def.2 <| subset_span
#align submodule.span_univ Submodule.span_univ
theorem span_union (s t : Set M) : span R (s ∪ t) = span R s ⊔ span R t :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_sup
#align submodule.span_union Submodule.span_union
theorem span_iUnion {ι} (s : ι → Set M) : span R (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, span R (s i) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup
#align submodule.span_Union Submodule.span_iUnion
theorem span_iUnion₂ {ι} {κ : ι → Sort*} (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set M) :
span R (⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⨆ (i) (j), span R (s i j) :=
(Submodule.gi R M).gc.l_iSup₂
#align submodule.span_Union₂ Submodule.span_iUnion₂
theorem span_attach_biUnion [DecidableEq M] {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : s → Finset M) :
span R (s.attach.biUnion f : Set M) = ⨆ x, span R (f x) := by simp [span_iUnion]
#align submodule.span_attach_bUnion Submodule.span_attach_biUnion
theorem sup_span : p ⊔ span R s = span R (p ∪ s) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.sup_span Submodule.sup_span
theorem span_sup : span R s ⊔ p = span R (s ∪ p) := by rw [Submodule.span_union, p.span_eq]
#align submodule.span_sup Submodule.span_sup
notation:1000
R " ∙ " x => span R (singleton x)
theorem span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans (s : Set M) : span R s = ⨆ x ∈ s, R ∙ x := by
simp only [← span_iUnion, Set.biUnion_of_singleton s]
#align submodule.span_eq_supr_of_singleton_spans Submodule.span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans
theorem span_range_eq_iSup {ι : Sort*} {v : ι → M} : span R (range v) = ⨆ i, R ∙ v i := by
rw [span_eq_iSup_of_singleton_spans, iSup_range]
#align submodule.span_range_eq_supr Submodule.span_range_eq_iSup
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Span.lean | 355 | 358 | theorem span_smul_le (s : Set M) (r : R) : span R (r • s) ≤ span R s := by |
rw [span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact smul_mem (span R s) r (subset_span hx)
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Sub.Canonical
import Mathlib.Data.List.Perm
import Mathlib.Data.Set.List
import Mathlib.Init.Quot
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.Basic
#align_import data.multiset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
def Multiset.{u} (α : Type u) : Type u :=
Quotient (List.isSetoid α)
#align multiset Multiset
namespace Multiset
-- Porting note: new
@[coe]
def ofList : List α → Multiset α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Multiset α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) ⟦l⟧ l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk (· ≈ ·) l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'
@[simp]
theorem quot_mk_to_coe'' (l : List α) : @Eq (Multiset α) (Quot.mk Setoid.r l) l :=
rfl
#align multiset.quot_mk_to_coe'' Multiset.quot_mk_to_coe''
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Multiset α) = l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ :=
Quotient.eq
#align multiset.coe_eq_coe Multiset.coe_eq_coe
-- Porting note: new instance;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: move to better place
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ ≈ l₂) :=
inferInstanceAs (Decidable (l₁ ~ l₂))
-- Porting note: `Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂` was in parens which broke elaboration
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Multiset α)
| s₁, s₂ => Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂ s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq
#align multiset.has_decidable_eq Multiset.decidableEq
protected
def sizeOf [SizeOf α] (s : Multiset α) : ℕ :=
(Quot.liftOn s SizeOf.sizeOf) fun _ _ => Perm.sizeOf_eq_sizeOf
#align multiset.sizeof Multiset.sizeOf
instance [SizeOf α] : SizeOf (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.sizeOf⟩
protected def zero : Multiset α :=
@nil α
#align multiset.zero Multiset.zero
instance : Zero (Multiset α) :=
⟨Multiset.zero⟩
instance : EmptyCollection (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance inhabitedMultiset : Inhabited (Multiset α) :=
⟨0⟩
#align multiset.inhabited_multiset Multiset.inhabitedMultiset
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Multiset α) where
default := 0
uniq := by rintro ⟨_ | ⟨a, l⟩⟩; exacts [rfl, isEmptyElim a]
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : (@nil α : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.coe_nil Multiset.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq_zero : (∅ : Multiset α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align multiset.empty_eq_zero Multiset.empty_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_zero (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l = [] :=
Iff.trans coe_eq_coe perm_nil
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero Multiset.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty (l : List α) : (l : Multiset α) = 0 ↔ l.isEmpty :=
Iff.trans (coe_eq_zero l) isEmpty_iff_eq_nil.symm
#align multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_empty Multiset.coe_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
def cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : Multiset α :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => (a :: l : Multiset α)) fun _ _ p => Quot.sound (p.cons a)
#align multiset.cons Multiset.cons
@[inherit_doc Multiset.cons]
infixr:67 " ::ₘ " => Multiset.cons
instance : Insert α (Multiset α) :=
⟨cons⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_cons (a : α) (s : Multiset α) : insert a s = a ::ₘ s :=
rfl
#align multiset.insert_eq_cons Multiset.insert_eq_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_coe (a : α) (l : List α) : (a ::ₘ l : Multiset α) = (a :: l : List α) :=
rfl
#align multiset.cons_coe Multiset.cons_coe
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj_left {a b : α} (s : Multiset α) : a ::ₘ s = b ::ₘ s ↔ a = b :=
⟨Quot.inductionOn s fun l e =>
have : [a] ++ l ~ [b] ++ l := Quotient.exact e
singleton_perm_singleton.1 <| (perm_append_right_iff _).1 this,
congr_arg (· ::ₘ _)⟩
#align multiset.cons_inj_left Multiset.cons_inj_left
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 157 | 158 | theorem cons_inj_right (a : α) : ∀ {s t : Multiset α}, a ::ₘ s = a ::ₘ t ↔ s = t := by |
rintro ⟨l₁⟩ ⟨l₂⟩; simp
|
import Mathlib.Data.List.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.List.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Bool.Basic
#align_import data.list.intervals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7b78d1776212a91ecc94cf601f83bdcc46b04213"
open Nat
namespace List
def Ico (n m : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
range' n (m - n)
#align list.Ico List.Ico
namespace Ico
theorem zero_bot (n : ℕ) : Ico 0 n = range n := by rw [Ico, Nat.sub_zero, range_eq_range']
#align list.Ico.zero_bot List.Ico.zero_bot
@[simp]
theorem length (n m : ℕ) : length (Ico n m) = m - n := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [length_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.length List.Ico.length
theorem pairwise_lt (n m : ℕ) : Pairwise (· < ·) (Ico n m) := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [pairwise_lt_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.pairwise_lt List.Ico.pairwise_lt
theorem nodup (n m : ℕ) : Nodup (Ico n m) := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [nodup_range', autoParam]
#align list.Ico.nodup List.Ico.nodup
@[simp]
theorem mem {n m l : ℕ} : l ∈ Ico n m ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m := by
suffices n ≤ l ∧ l < n + (m - n) ↔ n ≤ l ∧ l < m by simp [Ico, this]
rcases le_total n m with hnm | hmn
· rw [Nat.add_sub_cancel' hnm]
· rw [Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hmn, Nat.add_zero]
exact
and_congr_right fun hnl =>
Iff.intro (fun hln => (not_le_of_gt hln hnl).elim) fun hlm => lt_of_lt_of_le hlm hmn
#align list.Ico.mem List.Ico.mem
theorem eq_nil_of_le {n m : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : Ico n m = [] := by
simp [Ico, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h]
#align list.Ico.eq_nil_of_le List.Ico.eq_nil_of_le
theorem map_add (n m k : ℕ) : (Ico n m).map (k + ·) = Ico (n + k) (m + k) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, map_add_range', Nat.add_sub_add_right m k, Nat.add_comm n k]
#align list.Ico.map_add List.Ico.map_add
theorem map_sub (n m k : ℕ) (h₁ : k ≤ n) :
((Ico n m).map fun x => x - k) = Ico (n - k) (m - k) := by
rw [Ico, Ico, Nat.sub_sub_sub_cancel_right h₁, map_sub_range' _ _ _ h₁]
#align list.Ico.map_sub List.Ico.map_sub
@[simp]
theorem self_empty {n : ℕ} : Ico n n = [] :=
eq_nil_of_le (le_refl n)
#align list.Ico.self_empty List.Ico.self_empty
@[simp]
theorem eq_empty_iff {n m : ℕ} : Ico n m = [] ↔ m ≤ n :=
Iff.intro (fun h => Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.mp <| by rw [← length, h, List.length]) eq_nil_of_le
#align list.Ico.eq_empty_iff List.Ico.eq_empty_iff
theorem append_consecutive {n m l : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) (hml : m ≤ l) :
Ico n m ++ Ico m l = Ico n l := by
dsimp only [Ico]
convert range'_append n (m-n) (l-m) 1 using 2
· rw [Nat.one_mul, Nat.add_sub_cancel' hnm]
· rw [Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel hml hnm]
#align list.Ico.append_consecutive List.Ico.append_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem inter_consecutive (n m l : ℕ) : Ico n m ∩ Ico m l = [] := by
apply eq_nil_iff_forall_not_mem.2
intro a
simp only [and_imp, not_and, not_lt, List.mem_inter_iff, List.Ico.mem]
intro _ h₂ h₃
exfalso
exact not_lt_of_ge h₃ h₂
#align list.Ico.inter_consecutive List.Ico.inter_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem bagInter_consecutive (n m l : Nat) :
@List.bagInter ℕ instBEqOfDecidableEq (Ico n m) (Ico m l) = [] :=
(bagInter_nil_iff_inter_nil _ _).2 (by convert inter_consecutive n m l)
#align list.Ico.bag_inter_consecutive List.Ico.bagInter_consecutive
@[simp]
theorem succ_singleton {n : ℕ} : Ico n (n + 1) = [n] := by
dsimp [Ico]
simp [range', Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
#align list.Ico.succ_singleton List.Ico.succ_singleton
theorem succ_top {n m : ℕ} (h : n ≤ m) : Ico n (m + 1) = Ico n m ++ [m] := by
rwa [← succ_singleton, append_consecutive]
exact Nat.le_succ _
#align list.Ico.succ_top List.Ico.succ_top
| Mathlib/Data/List/Intervals.lean | 130 | 132 | theorem eq_cons {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) : Ico n m = n :: Ico (n + 1) m := by |
rw [← append_consecutive (Nat.le_succ n) h, succ_singleton]
rfl
|
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.connectivity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b99e2d58a5e6861833fa8de11e51a81144258db4"
open Function
universe u v w
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {V'' : Type w}
variable (G : SimpleGraph V) (G' : SimpleGraph V') (G'' : SimpleGraph V'')
inductive Walk : V → V → Type u
| nil {u : V} : Walk u u
| cons {u v w : V} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : Walk v w) : Walk u w
deriving DecidableEq
#align simple_graph.walk SimpleGraph.Walk
attribute [refl] Walk.nil
@[simps]
instance Walk.instInhabited (v : V) : Inhabited (G.Walk v v) := ⟨Walk.nil⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.inhabited SimpleGraph.Walk.instInhabited
@[match_pattern, reducible]
def Adj.toWalk {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Walk u v :=
Walk.cons h Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.adj.to_walk SimpleGraph.Adj.toWalk
namespace Walk
variable {G}
@[match_pattern]
abbrev nil' (u : V) : G.Walk u u := Walk.nil
#align simple_graph.walk.nil' SimpleGraph.Walk.nil'
@[match_pattern]
abbrev cons' (u v w : V) (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) : G.Walk u w := Walk.cons h p
#align simple_graph.walk.cons' SimpleGraph.Walk.cons'
protected def copy {u v u' v'} (p : G.Walk u v) (hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') : G.Walk u' v' :=
hu ▸ hv ▸ p
#align simple_graph.walk.copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_rfl_rfl {u v} (p : G.Walk u v) : p.copy rfl rfl = p := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_rfl_rfl SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_rfl_rfl
@[simp]
theorem copy_copy {u v u' v' u'' v''} (p : G.Walk u v)
(hu : u = u') (hv : v = v') (hu' : u' = u'') (hv' : v' = v'') :
(p.copy hu hv).copy hu' hv' = p.copy (hu.trans hu') (hv.trans hv') := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_copy
@[simp]
theorem copy_nil {u u'} (hu : u = u') : (Walk.nil : G.Walk u u).copy hu hu = Walk.nil := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_nil SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_nil
theorem copy_cons {u v w u' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v w) (hu : u = u') (hw : w = w') :
(Walk.cons h p).copy hu hw = Walk.cons (hu ▸ h) (p.copy rfl hw) := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.copy_cons SimpleGraph.Walk.copy_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_copy {u v w v' w'} (h : G.Adj u v) (p : G.Walk v' w') (hv : v' = v) (hw : w' = w) :
Walk.cons h (p.copy hv hw) = (Walk.cons (hv ▸ h) p).copy rfl hw := by
subst_vars
rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.cons_copy SimpleGraph.Walk.cons_copy
theorem exists_eq_cons_of_ne {u v : V} (hne : u ≠ v) :
∀ (p : G.Walk u v), ∃ (w : V) (h : G.Adj u w) (p' : G.Walk w v), p = cons h p'
| nil => (hne rfl).elim
| cons h p' => ⟨_, h, p', rfl⟩
#align simple_graph.walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne SimpleGraph.Walk.exists_eq_cons_of_ne
def length {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ
| nil => 0
| cons _ q => q.length.succ
#align simple_graph.walk.length SimpleGraph.Walk.length
@[trans]
def append {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk v w → G.Walk u w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => cons h (p.append q)
#align simple_graph.walk.append SimpleGraph.Walk.append
def concat {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) : G.Walk u w := p.append (cons h nil)
#align simple_graph.walk.concat SimpleGraph.Walk.concat
theorem concat_eq_append {u v w : V} (p : G.Walk u v) (h : G.Adj v w) :
p.concat h = p.append (cons h nil) := rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.concat_eq_append SimpleGraph.Walk.concat_eq_append
protected def reverseAux {u v w : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Walk u w → G.Walk v w
| nil, q => q
| cons h p, q => Walk.reverseAux p (cons (G.symm h) q)
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse_aux SimpleGraph.Walk.reverseAux
@[symm]
def reverse {u v : V} (w : G.Walk u v) : G.Walk v u := w.reverseAux nil
#align simple_graph.walk.reverse SimpleGraph.Walk.reverse
def getVert {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → ℕ → V
| nil, _ => u
| cons _ _, 0 => u
| cons _ q, n + 1 => q.getVert n
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert
@[simp]
theorem getVert_zero {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert 0 = u := by cases w <;> rfl
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_zero SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_zero
theorem getVert_of_length_le {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : w.length ≤ i) :
w.getVert i = v := by
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih =>
cases i
· cases hi
· exact ih (Nat.succ_le_succ_iff.1 hi)
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_of_length_le SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_of_length_le
@[simp]
theorem getVert_length {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) : w.getVert w.length = v :=
w.getVert_of_length_le rfl.le
#align simple_graph.walk.get_vert_length SimpleGraph.Walk.getVert_length
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity.lean | 226 | 233 | theorem adj_getVert_succ {u v} (w : G.Walk u v) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < w.length) :
G.Adj (w.getVert i) (w.getVert (i + 1)) := by |
induction w generalizing i with
| nil => cases hi
| cons hxy _ ih =>
cases i
· simp [getVert, hxy]
· exact ih (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
|
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.Connected.TotallyDisconnected
import Mathlib.Topology.Inseparable
#align_import topology.separation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
open Function Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X]
section Separation
def SeparatedNhds : Set X → Set X → Prop := fun s t : Set X =>
∃ U V : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ IsOpen V ∧ s ⊆ U ∧ t ⊆ V ∧ Disjoint U V
#align separated_nhds SeparatedNhds
theorem separatedNhds_iff_disjoint {s t : Set X} : SeparatedNhds s t ↔ Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) (𝓝ˢ t) := by
simp only [(hasBasis_nhdsSet s).disjoint_iff (hasBasis_nhdsSet t), SeparatedNhds, exists_prop, ←
exists_and_left, and_assoc, and_comm, and_left_comm]
#align separated_nhds_iff_disjoint separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
alias ⟨SeparatedNhds.disjoint_nhdsSet, _⟩ := separatedNhds_iff_disjoint
class T0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t0 : ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, Inseparable x y → x = y
#align t0_space T0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ ∀ x y : X, Inseparable x y → x = y :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align t0_space_iff_inseparable t0Space_iff_inseparable
theorem t0Space_iff_not_inseparable (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y : X => ¬Inseparable x y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, Ne, not_imp_not, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_not_inseparable t0Space_iff_not_inseparable
theorem Inseparable.eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : Inseparable x y) : x = y :=
T0Space.t0 h
#align inseparable.eq Inseparable.eq
protected theorem Inducing.injective [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Injective f := fun _ _ h =>
(hf.inseparable_iff.1 <| .of_eq h).eq
#align inducing.injective Inducing.injective
protected theorem Inducing.embedding [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Inducing f) : Embedding f :=
⟨hf, hf.injective⟩
#align inducing.embedding Inducing.embedding
lemma embedding_iff_inducing [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] {f : X → Y} :
Embedding f ↔ Inducing f :=
⟨Embedding.toInducing, Inducing.embedding⟩
#align embedding_iff_inducing embedding_iff_inducing
theorem t0Space_iff_nhds_injective (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
t0Space_iff_inseparable X
#align t0_space_iff_nhds_injective t0Space_iff_nhds_injective
theorem nhds_injective [T0Space X] : Injective (𝓝 : X → Filter X) :=
(t0Space_iff_nhds_injective X).1 ‹_›
#align nhds_injective nhds_injective
theorem inseparable_iff_eq [T0Space X] {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ x = y :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align inseparable_iff_eq inseparable_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem nhds_eq_nhds_iff [T0Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a = 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
nhds_injective.eq_iff
#align nhds_eq_nhds_iff nhds_eq_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem inseparable_eq_eq [T0Space X] : Inseparable = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext inseparable_iff_eq
#align inseparable_eq_eq inseparable_eq_eq
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.inseparable_iff {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
⟨fun h s hs ↦ inseparable_iff_forall_open.1 h _ (hb.isOpen hs),
fun h ↦ hb.nhds_hasBasis.eq_of_same_basis <| by
convert hb.nhds_hasBasis using 2
exact and_congr_right (h _)⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.eq_iff [T0Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} : x = y ↔ ∀ s ∈ b, (x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) :=
inseparable_iff_eq.symm.trans hb.inseparable_iff
theorem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, xor_iff_not_iff, not_forall, exists_prop,
inseparable_iff_forall_open, Pairwise]
#align t0_space_iff_exists_is_open_xor_mem t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
theorem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem [T0Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) :
∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ Xor' (x ∈ U) (y ∈ U) :=
(t0Space_iff_exists_isOpen_xor'_mem X).1 ‹_› h
#align exists_is_open_xor_mem exists_isOpen_xor'_mem
def specializationOrder (X) [TopologicalSpace X] [T0Space X] : PartialOrder X :=
{ specializationPreorder X, PartialOrder.lift (OrderDual.toDual ∘ 𝓝) nhds_injective with }
#align specialization_order specializationOrder
instance SeparationQuotient.instT0Space : T0Space (SeparationQuotient X) :=
⟨fun x y => Quotient.inductionOn₂' x y fun _ _ h =>
SeparationQuotient.mk_eq_mk.2 <| SeparationQuotient.inducing_mk.inseparable_iff.1 h⟩
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· refine this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s \ U = s := hmin (s \ U) diff_subset ⟨y, hy, hyU⟩ (hs.sdiff hUo)
exact (this.symm.subset hx).2 hxU
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsClosed t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2
⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_closed_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton
theorem IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton [T0Space X] [CompactSpace X] {S : Set X}
(hS : IsClosed S) (hne : S.Nonempty) : ∃ x : X, x ∈ S ∧ IsClosed ({x} : Set X) := by
obtain ⟨V, Vsub, Vne, Vcls, hV⟩ := hS.exists_minimal_nonempty_closed_subset hne
rcases minimal_nonempty_closed_eq_singleton Vcls Vne hV with ⟨x, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, Vsub (mem_singleton x), Vcls⟩
#align is_closed.exists_closed_singleton IsClosed.exists_closed_singleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : s.Subsingleton := by
clear Y -- Porting note: added
refine fun x hx y hy => of_not_not fun hxy => ?_
rcases exists_isOpen_xor'_mem hxy with ⟨U, hUo, hU⟩
wlog h : x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U
· exact this hs hmin y hy x hx (Ne.symm hxy) U hUo hU.symm (hU.resolve_left h)
cases' h with hxU hyU
have : s ∩ U = s := hmin (s ∩ U) inter_subset_left ⟨x, hx, hxU⟩ (hs.inter hUo)
exact hyU (this.symm.subset hy).2
#align minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton
theorem minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (hmin : ∀ t, t ⊆ s → t.Nonempty → IsOpen t → t = s) : ∃ x, s = {x} :=
exists_eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_subsingleton.2 ⟨hne, minimal_nonempty_open_subsingleton hs hmin⟩
#align minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton
theorem exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite [T0Space X] {s : Set X} (hfin : s.Finite)
(hne : s.Nonempty) (ho : IsOpen s) : ∃ x ∈ s, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
lift s to Finset X using hfin
induction' s using Finset.strongInductionOn with s ihs
rcases em (∃ t, t ⊂ s ∧ t.Nonempty ∧ IsOpen (t : Set X)) with (⟨t, hts, htne, hto⟩ | ht)
· rcases ihs t hts htne hto with ⟨x, hxt, hxo⟩
exact ⟨x, hts.1 hxt, hxo⟩
· -- Porting note: was `rcases minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne _ with ⟨x, hx⟩`
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/116
rsuffices ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, s.toSet = {x}
· exact ⟨x, hx.symm ▸ rfl, hx ▸ ho⟩
refine minimal_nonempty_open_eq_singleton ho hne ?_
refine fun t hts htne hto => of_not_not fun hts' => ht ?_
lift t to Finset X using s.finite_toSet.subset hts
exact ⟨t, ssubset_iff_subset_ne.2 ⟨hts, mt Finset.coe_inj.2 hts'⟩, htne, hto⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_open_finite exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite
theorem exists_open_singleton_of_finite [T0Space X] [Finite X] [Nonempty X] :
∃ x : X, IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
let ⟨x, _, h⟩ := exists_isOpen_singleton_of_isOpen_finite (Set.toFinite _)
univ_nonempty isOpen_univ
⟨x, h⟩
#align exists_open_singleton_of_fintype exists_open_singleton_of_finite
theorem t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T0Space Y] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => hf <| (h.map hf').eq⟩
#align t0_space_of_injective_of_continuous t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T0Space X :=
t0Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t0_space Embedding.t0Space
instance Subtype.t0Space [T0Space X] {p : X → Prop} : T0Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t0Space
#align subtype.t0_space Subtype.t0Space
theorem t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
T0Space X ↔ Pairwise fun a b : X => a ∉ closure ({b} : Set X) ∨ b ∉ closure ({a} : Set X) := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_not_inseparable, inseparable_iff_mem_closure, not_and_or]
#align t0_space_iff_or_not_mem_closure t0Space_iff_or_not_mem_closure
instance Prod.instT0Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T0Space X] [T0Space Y] : T0Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => Prod.ext (h.map continuous_fst).eq (h.map continuous_snd).eq⟩
instance Pi.instT0Space {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
[∀ i, T0Space (X i)] :
T0Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun _ _ h => funext fun i => (h.map (continuous_apply i)).eq⟩
#align pi.t0_space Pi.instT0Space
instance ULift.instT0Space [T0Space X] : T0Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t0Space
theorem T0Space.of_cover (h : ∀ x y, Inseparable x y → ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s ∧ T0Space s) :
T0Space X := by
refine ⟨fun x y hxy => ?_⟩
rcases h x y hxy with ⟨s, hxs, hys, hs⟩
lift x to s using hxs; lift y to s using hys
rw [← subtype_inseparable_iff] at hxy
exact congr_arg Subtype.val hxy.eq
#align t0_space.of_cover T0Space.of_cover
theorem T0Space.of_open_cover (h : ∀ x, ∃ s : Set X, x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s ∧ T0Space s) : T0Space X :=
T0Space.of_cover fun x _ hxy =>
let ⟨s, hxs, hso, hs⟩ := h x
⟨s, hxs, (hxy.mem_open_iff hso).1 hxs, hs⟩
#align t0_space.of_open_cover T0Space.of_open_cover
@[mk_iff]
class R0Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
specializes_symmetric : Symmetric (Specializes : X → X → Prop)
export R0Space (specializes_symmetric)
class T1Space (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
t1 : ∀ x, IsClosed ({x} : Set X)
#align t1_space T1Space
theorem isClosed_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsClosed ({x} : Set X) :=
T1Space.t1 x
#align is_closed_singleton isClosed_singleton
theorem isOpen_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen ({x}ᶜ : Set X) :=
isClosed_singleton.isOpen_compl
#align is_open_compl_singleton isOpen_compl_singleton
theorem isOpen_ne [T1Space X] {x : X} : IsOpen { y | y ≠ x } :=
isOpen_compl_singleton
#align is_open_ne isOpen_ne
@[to_additive]
theorem Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport [T1Space X] [One X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → X}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsOpen (mulSupport f) :=
isOpen_ne.preimage hf
#align continuous.is_open_mul_support Continuous.isOpen_mulSupport
#align continuous.is_open_support Continuous.isOpen_support
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x = 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_ne.nhdsWithin_eq h
#align ne.nhds_within_compl_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton
theorem Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) (s : Set X) :
𝓝[s \ {y}] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [diff_eq, inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem]
exact mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds h)
#align ne.nhds_within_diff_singleton Ne.nhdsWithin_diff_singleton
lemma nhdsWithin_compl_singleton_le [T1Space X] (x y : X) : 𝓝[{x}ᶜ] x ≤ 𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with rfl|hy
· exact Eq.le rfl
· rw [Ne.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton hy]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≠] x, p y } := by
refine isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.mpr fun a ha => ?_
filter_upwards [eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.mpr ha] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne a b with rfl | h
· exact hb
· rw [h.symm.nhdsWithin_compl_singleton] at hb
exact hb.filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds_within isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhdsWithin
protected theorem Set.Finite.isClosed [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : Set.Finite s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [← biUnion_of_singleton s]
exact hs.isClosed_biUnion fun i _ => isClosed_singleton
#align set.finite.is_closed Set.Finite.isClosed
theorem TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne [T1Space X] {b : Set (Set X)}
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ a ∈ b, x ∈ a ∧ y ∉ a := by
rcases hb.isOpen_iff.1 isOpen_ne x h with ⟨a, ab, xa, ha⟩
exact ⟨a, ab, xa, fun h => ha h rfl⟩
#align topological_space.is_topological_basis.exists_mem_of_ne TopologicalSpace.IsTopologicalBasis.exists_mem_of_ne
protected theorem Finset.isClosed [T1Space X] (s : Finset X) : IsClosed (s : Set X) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed
#align finset.is_closed Finset.isClosed
theorem t1Space_TFAE (X : Type u) [TopologicalSpace X] :
List.TFAE [T1Space X,
∀ x, IsClosed ({ x } : Set X),
∀ x, IsOpen ({ x }ᶜ : Set X),
Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → {y}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ s ∈ 𝓝 x, y ∉ s,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U,
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y),
∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
tfae_have 2 ↔ 3
· simp only [isOpen_compl_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 3
· refine forall_swap.trans ?_
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 6
· simp only [← subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_mem_subset_iff]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 7
· simp only [(nhds_basis_opens _).mem_iff, subset_compl_singleton_iff, exists_prop, and_assoc,
and_left_comm]
tfae_have 5 ↔ 8
· simp only [← principal_singleton, disjoint_principal_right]
tfae_have 8 ↔ 9
· exact forall_swap.trans (by simp only [disjoint_comm, ne_comm])
tfae_have 1 → 4
· simp only [continuous_def, CofiniteTopology.isOpen_iff']
rintro H s (rfl | hs)
exacts [isOpen_empty, compl_compl s ▸ (@Set.Finite.isClosed _ _ H _ hs).isOpen_compl]
tfae_have 4 → 2
· exact fun h x => (CofiniteTopology.isClosed_iff.2 <| Or.inr (finite_singleton _)).preimage h
tfae_have 2 ↔ 10
· simp only [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed, specializes_iff_mem_closure, subset_def,
mem_singleton_iff, eq_comm]
tfae_finish
#align t1_space_tfae t1Space_TFAE
theorem t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of : T1Space X ↔ Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 3
#align t1_space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of
theorem CofiniteTopology.continuous_of [T1Space X] : Continuous (@CofiniteTopology.of X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mp ‹_›
#align cofinite_topology.continuous_of CofiniteTopology.continuous_of
theorem t1Space_iff_exists_open :
T1Space X ↔ Pairwise fun x y => ∃ U : Set X, IsOpen U ∧ x ∈ U ∧ y ∉ U :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 6
#align t1_space_iff_exists_open t1Space_iff_exists_open
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 8
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ≠ y → Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 7
#align t1_space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq : T1Space X ↔ ∀ ⦃x y : X⦄, x ⤳ y → x = y :=
(t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 9
#align t1_space_iff_specializes_imp_eq t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq
theorem disjoint_pure_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (pure x) (𝓝 y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_pure_nhds.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_pure_nhds disjoint_pure_nhds
theorem disjoint_nhds_pure [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ≠ y) : Disjoint (𝓝 x) (pure y) :=
t1Space_iff_disjoint_nhds_pure.mp ‹_› h
#align disjoint_nhds_pure disjoint_nhds_pure
theorem Specializes.eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : x ⤳ y) : x = y :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.1 ‹_› h
#align specializes.eq Specializes.eq
theorem specializes_iff_eq [T1Space X] {x y : X} : x ⤳ y ↔ x = y :=
⟨Specializes.eq, fun h => h ▸ specializes_rfl⟩
#align specializes_iff_eq specializes_iff_eq
@[simp] theorem specializes_eq_eq [T1Space X] : (· ⤳ ·) = @Eq X :=
funext₂ fun _ _ => propext specializes_iff_eq
#align specializes_eq_eq specializes_eq_eq
@[simp]
theorem pure_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : pure a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_pure.symm.trans specializes_iff_eq
#align pure_le_nhds_iff pure_le_nhds_iff
@[simp]
theorem nhds_le_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {a b : X} : 𝓝 a ≤ 𝓝 b ↔ a = b :=
specializes_iff_eq
#align nhds_le_nhds_iff nhds_le_nhds_iff
instance (priority := 100) [T1Space X] : R0Space X where
specializes_symmetric _ _ := by rw [specializes_iff_eq, specializes_iff_eq]; exact Eq.symm
instance : T1Space (CofiniteTopology X) :=
t1Space_iff_continuous_cofinite_of.mpr continuous_id
theorem t1Space_antitone : Antitone (@T1Space X) := fun a _ h _ =>
@T1Space.mk _ a fun x => (T1Space.t1 x).mono h
#align t1_space_antitone t1Space_antitone
theorem continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousWithinAt (Function.update f x y) s x' ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x' :=
EventuallyEq.congr_continuousWithinAt
(mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| mem_of_superset (isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hne) fun _y' hy' =>
Function.update_noteq hy' _ _)
(Function.update_noteq hne _ _)
#align continuous_within_at_update_of_ne continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousAt_update_of_ne [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y]
{f : X → Y} {x x' : X} {y : Y} (hne : x' ≠ x) :
ContinuousAt (Function.update f x y) x' ↔ ContinuousAt f x' := by
simp only [← continuousWithinAt_univ, continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hne]
#align continuous_at_update_of_ne continuousAt_update_of_ne
theorem continuousOn_update_iff [T1Space X] [DecidableEq X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
{s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y} :
ContinuousOn (Function.update f x y) s ↔
ContinuousOn f (s \ {x}) ∧ (x ∈ s → Tendsto f (𝓝[s \ {x}] x) (𝓝 y)) := by
rw [ContinuousOn, ← and_forall_ne x, and_comm]
refine and_congr ⟨fun H z hz => ?_, fun H z hzx hzs => ?_⟩ (forall_congr' fun _ => ?_)
· specialize H z hz.2 hz.1
rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hz.2] at H
exact H.mono diff_subset
· rw [continuousWithinAt_update_of_ne hzx]
refine (H z ⟨hzs, hzx⟩).mono_of_mem (inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ ?_)
exact isOpen_ne.mem_nhds hzx
· exact continuousWithinAt_update_same
#align continuous_on_update_iff continuousOn_update_iff
theorem t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Function.Injective f) (hf' : Continuous f) [T1Space Y] : T1Space X :=
t1Space_iff_specializes_imp_eq.2 fun _ _ h => hf (h.map hf').eq
#align t1_space_of_injective_of_continuous t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous
protected theorem Embedding.t1Space [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : Embedding f) : T1Space X :=
t1Space_of_injective_of_continuous hf.inj hf.continuous
#align embedding.t1_space Embedding.t1Space
instance Subtype.t1Space {X : Type u} [TopologicalSpace X] [T1Space X] {p : X → Prop} :
T1Space (Subtype p) :=
embedding_subtype_val.t1Space
#align subtype.t1_space Subtype.t1Space
instance [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space X] [T1Space Y] : T1Space (X × Y) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => @singleton_prod_singleton _ _ a b ▸ isClosed_singleton.prod isClosed_singleton⟩
instance {ι : Type*} {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, T1Space (X i)] :
T1Space (∀ i, X i) :=
⟨fun f => univ_pi_singleton f ▸ isClosed_set_pi fun _ _ => isClosed_singleton⟩
instance ULift.instT1Space [T1Space X] : T1Space (ULift X) :=
embedding_uLift_down.t1Space
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) TotallyDisconnectedSpace.t1Space [h: TotallyDisconnectedSpace X] :
T1Space X := by
rw [((t1Space_TFAE X).out 0 1 :)]
intro x
rw [← totallyDisconnectedSpace_iff_connectedComponent_singleton.mp h x]
exact isClosed_connectedComponent
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) T1Space.t0Space [T1Space X] : T0Space X :=
⟨fun _ _ h => h.specializes.eq⟩
#align t1_space.t0_space T1Space.t0Space
@[simp]
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff [T1Space X] {x y : X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y ↔ y ≠ x :=
isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhds_iff
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff
theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhds [T1Space X] {x y : X} (h : y ≠ x) : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 y :=
compl_singleton_mem_nhds_iff.mpr h
#align compl_singleton_mem_nhds compl_singleton_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem closure_singleton [T1Space X] {x : X} : closure ({x} : Set X) = {x} :=
isClosed_singleton.closure_eq
#align closure_singleton closure_singleton
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: the proof was `hs.induction_on (by simp) fun x => by simp`
theorem Set.Subsingleton.closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} (hs : s.Subsingleton) :
(closure s).Subsingleton := by
rcases hs.eq_empty_or_singleton with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩) <;> simp
#align set.subsingleton.closure Set.Subsingleton.closure
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_closure [T1Space X] {s : Set X} : (closure s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨fun h => h.anti subset_closure, fun h => h.closure⟩
#align subsingleton_closure subsingleton_closure
theorem isClosedMap_const {X Y} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [T1Space Y] {y : Y} :
IsClosedMap (Function.const X y) :=
IsClosedMap.of_nonempty fun s _ h2s => by simp_rw [const, h2s.image_const, isClosed_singleton]
#align is_closed_map_const isClosedMap_const
theorem nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s : Set X} (hxy : x ≠ y) :
𝓝[insert y s] x = 𝓝[s] x := by
refine le_antisymm (Filter.le_def.2 fun t ht => ?_) (nhdsWithin_mono x <| subset_insert y s)
obtain ⟨o, ho, hxo, host⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht
refine mem_nhdsWithin.mpr ⟨o \ {y}, ho.sdiff isClosed_singleton, ⟨hxo, hxy⟩, ?_⟩
rw [inter_insert_of_not_mem <| not_mem_diff_of_mem (mem_singleton y)]
exact (inter_subset_inter diff_subset Subset.rfl).trans host
#align nhds_within_insert_of_ne nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne
theorem insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert [T1Space X] {x y : X} {s t : Set X}
(hu : t ⊆ insert y s) : insert x s ∈ 𝓝[t] x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x y with (rfl | h)
· exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin hu
refine nhdsWithin_mono x hu ?_
rw [nhdsWithin_insert_of_ne h]
exact mem_of_superset self_mem_nhdsWithin (subset_insert x s)
#align insert_mem_nhds_within_of_subset_insert insert_mem_nhdsWithin_of_subset_insert
@[simp]
theorem ker_nhds [T1Space X] (x : X) : (𝓝 x).ker = {x} := by
simp [ker_nhds_eq_specializes]
theorem biInter_basis_nhds [T1Space X] {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} {x : X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : ⋂ (i) (_ : p i), s i = {x} := by
rw [← h.ker, ker_nhds]
#align bInter_basis_nhds biInter_basis_nhds
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Separation.lean | 777 | 778 | theorem compl_singleton_mem_nhdsSet_iff [T1Space X] {x : X} {s : Set X} : {x}ᶜ ∈ 𝓝ˢ s ↔ x ∉ s := by |
rw [isOpen_compl_singleton.mem_nhdsSet, subset_compl_singleton_iff]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Dist
import Mathlib.Data.Ordmap.Ordnode
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import data.ordmap.ordset from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"47b51515e69f59bca5cf34ef456e6000fe205a69"
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Ordnode
theorem not_le_delta {s} (H : 1 ≤ s) : ¬s ≤ delta * 0 :=
not_le_of_gt H
#align ordnode.not_le_delta Ordnode.not_le_delta
theorem delta_lt_false {a b : ℕ} (h₁ : delta * a < b) (h₂ : delta * b < a) : False :=
not_le_of_lt (lt_trans ((mul_lt_mul_left (by decide)).2 h₁) h₂) <| by
simpa [mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right a (by decide : 1 ≤ delta * delta)
#align ordnode.delta_lt_false Ordnode.delta_lt_false
def realSize : Ordnode α → ℕ
| nil => 0
| node _ l _ r => realSize l + realSize r + 1
#align ordnode.real_size Ordnode.realSize
def Sized : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node s l _ r => s = size l + size r + 1 ∧ Sized l ∧ Sized r
#align ordnode.sized Ordnode.Sized
theorem Sized.node' {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (node' l x r) :=
⟨rfl, hl, hr⟩
#align ordnode.sized.node' Ordnode.Sized.node'
theorem Sized.eq_node' {s l x r} (h : @Sized α (node s l x r)) : node s l x r = .node' l x r := by
rw [h.1]
#align ordnode.sized.eq_node' Ordnode.Sized.eq_node'
theorem Sized.size_eq {s l x r} (H : Sized (@node α s l x r)) :
size (@node α s l x r) = size l + size r + 1 :=
H.1
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq Ordnode.Sized.size_eq
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Sized.induction {t} (hl : @Sized α t) {C : Ordnode α → Prop} (H0 : C nil)
(H1 : ∀ l x r, C l → C r → C (.node' l x r)) : C t := by
induction t with
| nil => exact H0
| node _ _ _ _ t_ih_l t_ih_r =>
rw [hl.eq_node']
exact H1 _ _ _ (t_ih_l hl.2.1) (t_ih_r hl.2.2)
#align ordnode.sized.induction Ordnode.Sized.induction
theorem size_eq_realSize : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → size t = realSize t
| nil, _ => rfl
| node s l x r, ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
rw [size, h₁, size_eq_realSize h₂, size_eq_realSize h₃]; rfl
#align ordnode.size_eq_real_size Ordnode.size_eq_realSize
@[simp]
theorem Sized.size_eq_zero {t : Ordnode α} (ht : Sized t) : size t = 0 ↔ t = nil := by
cases t <;> [simp;simp [ht.1]]
#align ordnode.sized.size_eq_zero Ordnode.Sized.size_eq_zero
theorem Sized.pos {s l x r} (h : Sized (@node α s l x r)) : 0 < s := by
rw [h.1]; apply Nat.le_add_left
#align ordnode.sized.pos Ordnode.Sized.pos
theorem dual_dual : ∀ t : Ordnode α, dual (dual t) = t
| nil => rfl
| node s l x r => by rw [dual, dual, dual_dual l, dual_dual r]
#align ordnode.dual_dual Ordnode.dual_dual
@[simp]
theorem size_dual (t : Ordnode α) : size (dual t) = size t := by cases t <;> rfl
#align ordnode.size_dual Ordnode.size_dual
def BalancedSz (l r : ℕ) : Prop :=
l + r ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r ∧ r ≤ delta * l
#align ordnode.balanced_sz Ordnode.BalancedSz
instance BalancedSz.dec : DecidableRel BalancedSz := fun _ _ => Or.decidable
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.dec Ordnode.BalancedSz.dec
def Balanced : Ordnode α → Prop
| nil => True
| node _ l _ r => BalancedSz (size l) (size r) ∧ Balanced l ∧ Balanced r
#align ordnode.balanced Ordnode.Balanced
instance Balanced.dec : DecidablePred (@Balanced α)
| nil => by
unfold Balanced
infer_instance
| node _ l _ r => by
unfold Balanced
haveI := Balanced.dec l
haveI := Balanced.dec r
infer_instance
#align ordnode.balanced.dec Ordnode.Balanced.dec
@[symm]
theorem BalancedSz.symm {l r : ℕ} : BalancedSz l r → BalancedSz r l :=
Or.imp (by rw [add_comm]; exact id) And.symm
#align ordnode.balanced_sz.symm Ordnode.BalancedSz.symm
theorem balancedSz_zero {l : ℕ} : BalancedSz l 0 ↔ l ≤ 1 := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [BalancedSz]
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_zero Ordnode.balancedSz_zero
theorem balancedSz_up {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ r₂ ≤ delta * l)
(H : BalancedSz l r₁) : BalancedSz l r₂ := by
refine or_iff_not_imp_left.2 fun h => ?_
refine ⟨?_, h₂.resolve_left h⟩
cases H with
| inl H =>
cases r₂
· cases h (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left (Nat.zero_le _) _) H)
· exact le_trans (le_trans (Nat.le_add_right _ _) H) (Nat.le_add_left 1 _)
| inr H =>
exact le_trans H.1 (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ h₁)
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_up Ordnode.balancedSz_up
theorem balancedSz_down {l r₁ r₂ : ℕ} (h₁ : r₁ ≤ r₂) (h₂ : l + r₂ ≤ 1 ∨ l ≤ delta * r₁)
(H : BalancedSz l r₂) : BalancedSz l r₁ :=
have : l + r₂ ≤ 1 → BalancedSz l r₁ := fun H => Or.inl (le_trans (Nat.add_le_add_left h₁ _) H)
Or.casesOn H this fun H => Or.casesOn h₂ this fun h₂ => Or.inr ⟨h₂, le_trans h₁ H.2⟩
#align ordnode.balanced_sz_down Ordnode.balancedSz_down
theorem Balanced.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Balanced t → Balanced (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨b, bl, br⟩ => ⟨by rw [size_dual, size_dual]; exact b.symm, br.dual, bl.dual⟩
#align ordnode.balanced.dual Ordnode.Balanced.dual
def node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' (node' l x m) y r
#align ordnode.node3_l Ordnode.node3L
def node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
node' l x (node' m y r)
#align ordnode.node3_r Ordnode.node3R
def node4L : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3L l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_l Ordnode.node4L
-- should not happen
def node4R : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ ml y mr, z, r => node' (node' l x ml) y (node' mr z r)
| l, x, nil, z, r => node3R l x nil z r
#align ordnode.node4_r Ordnode.node4R
-- should not happen
def rotateL : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| l, x, node _ m y r => if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r
| l, x, nil => node' l x nil
#align ordnode.rotate_l Ordnode.rotateL
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateL_node (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (sz : ℕ) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateL l x (node sz m y r) =
if size m < ratio * size r then node3L l x m y r else node4L l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateL_nil (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) : rotateL l x nil = node' l x nil :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def rotateR : Ordnode α → α → Ordnode α → Ordnode α
| node _ l x m, y, r => if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r
| nil, y, r => node' nil y r
#align ordnode.rotate_r Ordnode.rotateR
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
theorem rotateR_node (sz : ℕ) (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
rotateR (node sz l x m) y r =
if size m < ratio * size l then node3R l x m y r else node4R l x m y r :=
rfl
theorem rotateR_nil (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) : rotateR nil y r = node' nil y r :=
rfl
-- should not happen
def balanceL' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_l' Ordnode.balanceL'
def balanceR' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance_r' Ordnode.balanceR'
def balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) : Ordnode α :=
if size l + size r ≤ 1 then node' l x r
else
if size r > delta * size l then rotateL l x r
else if size l > delta * size r then rotateR l x r else node' l x r
#align ordnode.balance' Ordnode.balance'
theorem dual_node' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node' l x r) = node' (dual r) x (dual l) := by simp [node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node' Ordnode.dual_node'
theorem dual_node3L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3L l x m y r) = node3R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_l Ordnode.dual_node3L
theorem dual_node3R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node3R l x m y r) = node3L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
simp [node3L, node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node3_r Ordnode.dual_node3R
theorem dual_node4L (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4L l x m y r) = node4R (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3R, dual_node3L, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_l Ordnode.dual_node4L
theorem dual_node4R (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (m : Ordnode α) (y : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (node4R l x m y r) = node4L (dual r) y (dual m) x (dual l) := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node4R, node3L, dual_node3R, dual_node', add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_node4_r Ordnode.dual_node4R
theorem dual_rotateL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateL l x r) = rotateR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
cases r <;> simp [rotateL, rotateR, dual_node']; split_ifs <;>
simp [dual_node3L, dual_node4L, node3R, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_l Ordnode.dual_rotateL
theorem dual_rotateR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (rotateR l x r) = rotateL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (rotateL _ _ _), dual_rotateL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_rotate_r Ordnode.dual_rotateR
theorem dual_balance' (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balance' l x r) = balance' (dual r) x (dual l) := by
simp [balance', add_comm]; split_ifs with h h_1 h_2 <;>
simp [dual_node', dual_rotateL, dual_rotateR, add_comm]
cases delta_lt_false h_1 h_2
#align ordnode.dual_balance' Ordnode.dual_balance'
theorem dual_balanceL (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceL l x r) = balanceR (dual r) x (dual l) := by
unfold balanceL balanceR
cases' r with rs rl rx rr
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> dsimp only [dual, id] <;>
try rfl
split_ifs with h <;> repeat simp [h, add_comm]
· cases' l with ls ll lx lr; · rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs; swap; · simp [add_comm]
cases' ll with lls lll llx llr <;> cases' lr with lrs lrl lrx lrr <;> try rfl
dsimp only [dual, id]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h, add_comm]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_l Ordnode.dual_balanceL
theorem dual_balanceR (l : Ordnode α) (x : α) (r : Ordnode α) :
dual (balanceR l x r) = balanceL (dual r) x (dual l) := by
rw [← dual_dual (balanceL _ _ _), dual_balanceL, dual_dual, dual_dual]
#align ordnode.dual_balance_r Ordnode.dual_balanceR
theorem Sized.node3L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3L l x m y r) :=
(hl.node' hm).node' hr
#align ordnode.sized.node3_l Ordnode.Sized.node3L
theorem Sized.node3R {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node3R l x m y r) :=
hl.node' (hm.node' hr)
#align ordnode.sized.node3_r Ordnode.Sized.node3R
theorem Sized.node4L {l x m y r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hm : Sized m) (hr : Sized r) :
Sized (node4L l x m y r) := by
cases m <;> [exact (hl.node' hm).node' hr; exact (hl.node' hm.2.1).node' (hm.2.2.node' hr)]
#align ordnode.sized.node4_l Ordnode.Sized.node4L
theorem node3L_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3L, node', size]; rw [add_right_comm _ 1]
#align ordnode.node3_l_size Ordnode.node3L_size
theorem node3R_size {l x m y r} : size (@node3R α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
dsimp [node3R, node', size]; rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
#align ordnode.node3_r_size Ordnode.node3R_size
theorem node4L_size {l x m y r} (hm : Sized m) :
size (@node4L α l x m y r) = size l + size m + size r + 2 := by
cases m <;> simp [node4L, node3L, node'] <;> [abel; (simp [size, hm.1]; abel)]
#align ordnode.node4_l_size Ordnode.node4L_size
theorem Sized.dual : ∀ {t : Ordnode α}, Sized t → Sized (dual t)
| nil, _ => ⟨⟩
| node _ l _ r, ⟨rfl, sl, sr⟩ => ⟨by simp [size_dual, add_comm], Sized.dual sr, Sized.dual sl⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual Ordnode.Sized.dual
theorem Sized.dual_iff {t : Ordnode α} : Sized (.dual t) ↔ Sized t :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← dual_dual t]; exact h.dual, Sized.dual⟩
#align ordnode.sized.dual_iff Ordnode.Sized.dual_iff
theorem Sized.rotateL {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateL l x r) := by
cases r; · exact hl.node' hr
rw [Ordnode.rotateL_node]; split_ifs
· exact hl.node3L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
· exact hl.node4L hr.2.1 hr.2.2
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_l Ordnode.Sized.rotateL
theorem Sized.rotateR {l x r} (hl : @Sized α l) (hr : Sized r) : Sized (rotateR l x r) :=
Sized.dual_iff.1 <| by rw [dual_rotateR]; exact hr.dual.rotateL hl.dual
#align ordnode.sized.rotate_r Ordnode.Sized.rotateR
| Mathlib/Data/Ordmap/Ordset.lean | 423 | 427 | theorem Sized.rotateL_size {l x r} (hm : Sized r) :
size (@Ordnode.rotateL α l x r) = size l + size r + 1 := by |
cases r <;> simp [Ordnode.rotateL]
simp only [hm.1]
split_ifs <;> simp [node3L_size, node4L_size hm.2.1] <;> abel
|
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.Morphisms.QuasiCompact
import Mathlib.Topology.QuasiSeparated
#align_import algebraic_geometry.morphisms.quasi_separated from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1a51edf13debfcbe223fa06b1cb353b9ed9751cc"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite TopologicalSpace
universe u
open scoped AlgebraicGeometry
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y)
@[mk_iff]
class QuasiSeparated (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
diagonalQuasiCompact : QuasiCompact (pullback.diagonal f) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated
def QuasiSeparated.affineProperty : AffineTargetMorphismProperty := fun X _ _ _ =>
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ ∀ U V : X.affineOpens, IsCompact (U ∩ V : Set X.carrier) := by
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff]
constructor
· intro H U V; exact H U V U.1.2 U.2.isCompact V.1.2 V.2.isCompact
· intro H
suffices
∀ (U : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact U.1) (V : Opens X.carrier) (_ : IsCompact V.1),
IsCompact (U ⊓ V).1
by intro U V hU hU' hV hV'; exact this ⟨U, hU⟩ hU' ⟨V, hV⟩ hV'
intro U hU V hV
-- Porting note: it complains "unable to find motive", but telling Lean that motive is
-- underscore is actually sufficient, weird
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) V hV
· simp
· intro S _ V hV
change IsCompact (U.1 ∩ (S.1 ∪ V.1))
rw [Set.inter_union_distrib_left]
apply hV.union
clear hV
apply compact_open_induction_on (P := _) U hU
· simp
· intro S _ W hW
change IsCompact ((S.1 ∪ W.1) ∩ V.1)
rw [Set.union_inter_distrib_right]
apply hW.union
apply H
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_affine AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace {X Y : Scheme} [IsAffine Y]
(f : X ⟶ Y) : QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
delta AffineTargetMorphismProperty.diagonal
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_affine]
constructor
· intro H U V
haveI : IsAffine _ := U.2
haveI : IsAffine _ := V.2
let g : pullback (X.ofRestrict U.1.openEmbedding) (X.ofRestrict V.1.openEmbedding) ⟶ X :=
pullback.fst ≫ X.ofRestrict _
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
erw [Subtype.range_coe, Subtype.range_coe] at e
rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace]
exact @Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _ (H _ _) e
· introv H h₁ h₂
let g : pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ X := pullback.fst ≫ f₁
-- Porting note: `inferInstance` does not work here
have : IsOpenImmersion g := PresheafedSpace.IsOpenImmersion.comp _ _
have e := Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _ this.base_open.toEmbedding
rw [IsOpenImmersion.range_pullback_to_base_of_left] at e
simp_rw [isCompact_iff_compactSpace] at H
exact
@Homeomorph.compactSpace _ _ _ _
(H ⟨⟨_, h₁.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩
⟨⟨_, h₂.base_open.isOpen_range⟩, rangeIsAffineOpenOfOpenImmersion _⟩)
e.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_iff_quasi_separated_space AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact :
@QuasiSeparated = MorphismProperty.diagonal @QuasiCompact := by ext; exact quasiSeparated_iff _
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_diagonal_is_quasi_compact AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact
theorem quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq :
QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal = QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
funext; rw [quasi_compact_affineProperty_iff_quasiSeparatedSpace]; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_compact_affine_property_diagonal_eq AlgebraicGeometry.quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiCompact.affineProperty.diagonal := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact, quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty]
exact
diagonal_targetAffineLocally_eq_targetAffineLocally _ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property_diagonal AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal
theorem quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty :
@QuasiSeparated = targetAffineLocally QuasiSeparated.affineProperty := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal, quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_eq_affine_property AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty
theorem QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal : QuasiSeparated.affineProperty.IsLocal :=
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq ▸ QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_property_is_local AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal
instance (priority := 900) quasiSeparatedOfMono {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
QuasiSeparated f where
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_of_mono AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedOfMono
instance quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition :
MorphismProperty.IsStableUnderComposition @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
(MorphismProperty.diagonal_isStableUnderComposition
quasiCompact_respectsIso quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange)
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_composition AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_isStableUnderComposition
theorem quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange :
MorphismProperty.StableUnderBaseChange @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸
quasiCompact_stableUnderBaseChange.diagonal quasiCompact_respectsIso
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_stable_under_base_change AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange
instance quasiSeparatedComp {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f]
[QuasiSeparated g] : QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_comp AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedComp
theorem quasiSeparated_respectsIso : MorphismProperty.RespectsIso @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact.symm ▸ quasiCompact_respectsIso.diagonal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_respects_iso AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_respectsIso
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)),
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) [∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier,
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsAffine U] [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f g).carrier,
∃ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (_ : ∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)) (𝒰' :
∀ i : 𝒰.J, Scheme.OpenCover.{u} (pullback f (𝒰.map i))) (_ :
∀ i j, IsAffine ((𝒰' i).obj j)),
∀ (i : 𝒰.J) (j k : (𝒰' i).J),
CompactSpace (pullback ((𝒰' i).map j) ((𝒰' i).map k)).carrier] := by
have := QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal_affine_openCover_TFAE f
simp_rw [← quasiCompact_eq_affineProperty, ← quasiSeparated_eq_diagonal_is_quasiCompact,
quasi_compact_affineProperty_diagonal_eq] at this
exact this
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_TFAE
theorem QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target : PropertyIsLocalAtTarget @QuasiSeparated :=
quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty_diagonal.symm ▸
QuasiCompact.affineProperty_isLocal.diagonal.targetAffineLocallyIsLocal
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.is_local_at_target AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target
open List in
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
TFAE
[QuasiSeparated f,
∃ 𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y,
∀ i : 𝒰.J, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (i : 𝒰.J),
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : (𝒰.pullbackCover f).obj i ⟶ 𝒰.obj i),
∀ U : Opens Y.carrier, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U),
∀ {U : Scheme} (g : U ⟶ Y) [IsOpenImmersion g],
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ _),
∃ (ι : Type u) (U : ι → Opens Y.carrier) (_ : iSup U = ⊤),
∀ i, QuasiSeparated (f ∣_ U i)] :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_TFAE f
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_tfae AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_TFAE
theorem quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsAffine Y] :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_target_iff f, QuasiSeparated.affineProperty]
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_over_affine_iff AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff
theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated (X : Scheme) :
QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier ↔ QuasiSeparated (terminal.from X) :=
(quasiSeparated_over_affine_iff _).symm
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated_space_iff_quasi_separated AlgebraicGeometry.quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated
theorem QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y)
[∀ i, IsAffine (𝒰.obj i)] (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparatedSpace (pullback f (𝒰.map i)).carrier := by
rw [quasiSeparated_eq_affineProperty,
QuasiSeparated.affineProperty_isLocal.affine_openCover_iff f 𝒰]
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.affine_open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.affine_openCover_iff
theorem QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff {X Y : Scheme.{u}} (𝒰 : Scheme.OpenCover.{u} Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) :
QuasiSeparated f ↔ ∀ i, QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f (𝒰.map i) ⟶ _) :=
QuasiSeparated.is_local_at_target.openCover_iff f 𝒰
#align algebraic_geometry.quasi_separated.open_cover_iff AlgebraicGeometry.QuasiSeparated.openCover_iff
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.fst : pullback f g ⟶ X) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.fst f g inferInstance
instance {X Y S : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ S) (g : Y ⟶ S) [QuasiSeparated f] :
QuasiSeparated (pullback.snd : pullback f g ⟶ Y) :=
quasiSeparated_stableUnderBaseChange.snd f g inferInstance
instance {X Y Z : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [QuasiSeparated f] [QuasiSeparated g] :
QuasiSeparated (f ≫ g) :=
MorphismProperty.comp_mem _ f g inferInstance inferInstance
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Morphisms/QuasiSeparated.lean | 246 | 251 | theorem quasiSeparatedSpace_of_quasiSeparated {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y)
[hY : QuasiSeparatedSpace Y.carrier] [QuasiSeparated f] : QuasiSeparatedSpace X.carrier := by |
rw [quasiSeparatedSpace_iff_quasiSeparated] at hY ⊢
have : f ≫ terminal.from Y = terminal.from X := terminalIsTerminal.hom_ext _ _
rw [← this]
infer_instance
|
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 595 | 595 | theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by | rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
|
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.Order.Minimal
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Init
set_option autoImplicit true
open Set
def Matroid.ExchangeProperty {α : Type _} (P : Set α → Prop) : Prop :=
∀ X Y, P X → P Y → ∀ a ∈ X \ Y, ∃ b ∈ Y \ X, P (insert b (X \ {a}))
def Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty {α : Type _} (P : Set α → Prop) (X : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ I, P I → I ⊆ X → (maximals (· ⊆ ·) {Y | P Y ∧ I ⊆ Y ∧ Y ⊆ X}).Nonempty
@[ext] structure Matroid (α : Type _) where
(E : Set α)
(Base : Set α → Prop)
(Indep : Set α → Prop)
(indep_iff' : ∀ ⦃I⦄, Indep I ↔ ∃ B, Base B ∧ I ⊆ B)
(exists_base : ∃ B, Base B)
(base_exchange : Matroid.ExchangeProperty Base)
(maximality : ∀ X, X ⊆ E → Matroid.ExistsMaximalSubsetProperty Indep X)
(subset_ground : ∀ B, Base B → B ⊆ E)
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α}
protected class Finite (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
(ground_finite : M.E.Finite)
protected class Nonempty (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
(ground_nonempty : M.E.Nonempty)
theorem ground_nonempty (M : Matroid α) [M.Nonempty] : M.E.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.ground_nonempty
theorem ground_nonempty_iff (M : Matroid α) : M.E.Nonempty ↔ M.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h⟩
theorem ground_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : M.E.Finite :=
Finite.ground_finite
theorem set_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] (X : Set α) (hX : X ⊆ M.E := by aesop) : X.Finite :=
M.ground_finite.subset hX
instance finite_of_finite [Finite α] {M : Matroid α} : M.Finite :=
⟨Set.toFinite _⟩
class FiniteRk (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
exists_finite_base : ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ B.Finite
instance finiteRk_of_finite (M : Matroid α) [M.Finite] : FiniteRk M :=
⟨M.exists_base.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, M.set_finite B (M.subset_ground _ hB)⟩)⟩
class InfiniteRk (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
exists_infinite_base : ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ B.Infinite
class RkPos (M : Matroid α) : Prop where
empty_not_base : ¬M.Base ∅
theorem rkPos_iff_empty_not_base : M.RkPos ↔ ¬M.Base ∅ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ ↦ h, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
section exchange
namespace ExchangeProperty
variable {Base : Set α → Prop} (exch : ExchangeProperty Base)
theorem antichain (hB : Base B) (hB' : Base B') (h : B ⊆ B') : B = B' :=
h.antisymm (fun x hx ↦ by_contra
(fun hxB ↦ let ⟨_, hy, _⟩ := exch B' B hB' hB x ⟨hx, hxB⟩; hy.2 <| h hy.1))
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Basic.lean | 268 | 286 | theorem encard_diff_le_aux (exch : ExchangeProperty Base) (hB₁ : Base B₁) (hB₂ : Base B₂) :
(B₁ \ B₂).encard ≤ (B₂ \ B₁).encard := by |
obtain (he | hinf | ⟨e, he, hcard⟩) :=
(B₂ \ B₁).eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· rw [exch.antichain hB₂ hB₁ (diff_eq_empty.mp he)]
· exact le_top.trans_eq hinf.symm
obtain ⟨f, hf, hB'⟩ := exch B₂ B₁ hB₂ hB₁ e he
have : encard (insert f (B₂ \ {e}) \ B₁) < encard (B₂ \ B₁) := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm]; exact hcard
have hencard := encard_diff_le_aux exch hB₁ hB'
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ hf.1, diff_diff_comm, ← union_singleton, ← diff_diff, diff_diff_right,
inter_singleton_eq_empty.mpr he.2, union_empty] at hencard
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one he, ← encard_diff_singleton_add_one hf]
exact add_le_add_right hencard 1
termination_by (B₂ \ B₁).encard
|
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Multiequalizer
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.EpiMono
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Limits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Types
#align_import category_theory.glue_data from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"14b69e9f3c16630440a2cbd46f1ddad0d561dee7"
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v u₁ u₂
variable (C : Type u₁) [Category.{v} C] {C' : Type u₂} [Category.{v} C']
-- Porting note(#5171): linter not ported yet
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure GlueData where
J : Type v
U : J → C
V : J × J → C
f : ∀ i j, V (i, j) ⟶ U i
f_mono : ∀ i j, Mono (f i j) := by infer_instance
f_hasPullback : ∀ i j k, HasPullback (f i j) (f i k) := by infer_instance
f_id : ∀ i, IsIso (f i i) := by infer_instance
t : ∀ i j, V (i, j) ⟶ V (j, i)
t_id : ∀ i, t i i = 𝟙 _
t' : ∀ i j k, pullback (f i j) (f i k) ⟶ pullback (f j k) (f j i)
t_fac : ∀ i j k, t' i j k ≫ pullback.snd = pullback.fst ≫ t i j
cocycle : ∀ i j k, t' i j k ≫ t' j k i ≫ t' k i j = 𝟙 _
#align category_theory.glue_data CategoryTheory.GlueData
attribute [simp] GlueData.t_id
attribute [instance] GlueData.f_id GlueData.f_mono GlueData.f_hasPullback
attribute [reassoc] GlueData.t_fac GlueData.cocycle
namespace GlueData
variable {C}
variable (D : GlueData C)
@[simp]
theorem t'_iij (i j : D.J) : D.t' i i j = (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom := by
have eq₁ := D.t_fac i i j
have eq₂ := (IsIso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mpr (@pullback.condition _ _ _ _ _ _ (D.f i j) _)
rw [D.t_id, Category.comp_id, eq₂] at eq₁
have eq₃ := (IsIso.eq_comp_inv (D.f i i)).mp eq₁
rw [Category.assoc, ← pullback.condition, ← Category.assoc] at eq₃
exact
Mono.right_cancellation _ _
((Mono.right_cancellation _ _ eq₃).trans (pullbackSymmetry_hom_comp_fst _ _).symm)
#align category_theory.glue_data.t'_iij CategoryTheory.GlueData.t'_iij
theorem t'_jii (i j : D.J) : D.t' j i i = pullback.fst ≫ D.t j i ≫ inv pullback.snd := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← D.t_fac]
simp
#align category_theory.glue_data.t'_jii CategoryTheory.GlueData.t'_jii
theorem t'_iji (i j : D.J) : D.t' i j i = pullback.fst ≫ D.t i j ≫ inv pullback.snd := by
rw [← Category.assoc, ← D.t_fac]
simp
#align category_theory.glue_data.t'_iji CategoryTheory.GlueData.t'_iji
@[reassoc, elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem t_inv (i j : D.J) : D.t i j ≫ D.t j i = 𝟙 _ := by
have eq : (pullbackSymmetry (D.f i i) (D.f i j)).hom = pullback.snd ≫ inv pullback.fst := by simp
have := D.cocycle i j i
rw [D.t'_iij, D.t'_jii, D.t'_iji, fst_eq_snd_of_mono_eq, eq] at this
simp only [Category.assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc] at this
rw [← IsIso.eq_inv_comp, ← Category.assoc, IsIso.comp_inv_eq] at this
simpa using this
#align category_theory.glue_data.t_inv CategoryTheory.GlueData.t_inv
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/GlueData.lean | 108 | 111 | theorem t'_inv (i j k : D.J) :
D.t' i j k ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom ≫ D.t' j i k ≫ (pullbackSymmetry _ _).hom = 𝟙 _ := by |
rw [← cancel_mono (pullback.fst : pullback (D.f i j) (D.f i k) ⟶ _)]
simp [t_fac, t_fac_assoc]
|
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Definitions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import ring_theory.polynomial.pochhammer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"53b216bcc1146df1c4a0a86877890ea9f1f01589"
universe u v
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable (S : Type u) [Semiring S]
noncomputable def ascPochhammer : ℕ → S[X]
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 => X * (ascPochhammer n).comp (X + 1)
#align pochhammer ascPochhammer
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_zero : ascPochhammer S 0 = 1 :=
rfl
#align pochhammer_zero ascPochhammer_zero
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_one : ascPochhammer S 1 = X := by simp [ascPochhammer]
#align pochhammer_one ascPochhammer_one
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_left (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = X * (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
rw [ascPochhammer]
#align pochhammer_succ_left ascPochhammer_succ_left
theorem monic_ascPochhammer (n : ℕ) [Nontrivial S] [NoZeroDivisors S] :
Monic <| ascPochhammer S n := by
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : leadingCoeff (X + 1 : S[X]) = 1 := leadingCoeff_X_add_C 1
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, Monic.def, leadingCoeff_mul,
leadingCoeff_comp (ne_zero_of_eq_one <| natDegree_X_add_C 1 : natDegree (X + 1) ≠ 0), hn,
monic_X, one_mul, one_mul, this, one_pow]
section
variable {S} {T : Type v} [Semiring T]
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_map (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S n).map f = ascPochhammer T n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· simp [ih, ascPochhammer_succ_left, map_comp]
#align pochhammer_map ascPochhammer_map
theorem ascPochhammer_eval₂ (f : S →+* T) (n : ℕ) (t : T) :
(ascPochhammer T n).eval t = (ascPochhammer S n).eval₂ f t := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map f]
exact eval_map f t
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_comp {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) (p : R[X]) [Algebra R S]
(x : S) : ((ascPochhammer S n).comp (p.map (algebraMap R S))).eval x =
(ascPochhammer S n).eval (p.eval₂ (algebraMap R S) x) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_eval₂ (algebraMap R S), ← eval₂_comp', ← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap R S),
← map_comp, eval_map]
end
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_cast (n k : ℕ) :
(((ascPochhammer ℕ n).eval k : ℕ) : S) = ((ascPochhammer S n).eval k : S) := by
rw [← ascPochhammer_map (algebraMap ℕ S), eval_map, ← eq_natCast (algebraMap ℕ S),
eval₂_at_natCast,Nat.cast_id]
#align pochhammer_eval_cast ascPochhammer_eval_cast
theorem ascPochhammer_eval_zero {n : ℕ} : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
cases n
· simp
· simp [X_mul, Nat.succ_ne_zero, ascPochhammer_succ_left]
#align pochhammer_eval_zero ascPochhammer_eval_zero
theorem ascPochhammer_zero_eval_zero : (ascPochhammer S 0).eval 0 = 1 := by simp
#align pochhammer_zero_eval_zero ascPochhammer_zero_eval_zero
@[simp]
theorem ascPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (ascPochhammer S n).eval 0 = 0 := by
simp [ascPochhammer_eval_zero, h]
#align pochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero ascPochhammer_ne_zero_eval_zero
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_right (n : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) = ascPochhammer S n * (X + (n : S[X])) := by
suffices h : ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) = ascPochhammer ℕ n * (X + (n : ℕ[X])) by
apply_fun Polynomial.map (algebraMap ℕ S) at h
simpa only [ascPochhammer_map, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_add, map_X,
Polynomial.map_natCast] using h
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· conv_lhs =>
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_left, ih, mul_comp, ← mul_assoc, ← ascPochhammer_succ_left, add_comp,
X_comp, natCast_comp, add_assoc, add_comm (1 : ℕ[X]), ← Nat.cast_succ]
#align pochhammer_succ_right ascPochhammer_succ_right
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_eval {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (n : ℕ) (k : S) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).eval k = (ascPochhammer S n).eval k * (k + n) := by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, mul_add, eval_add, eval_mul_X, ← Nat.cast_comm, ← C_eq_natCast,
eval_C_mul, Nat.cast_comm, ← mul_add]
#align pochhammer_succ_eval ascPochhammer_succ_eval
theorem ascPochhammer_succ_comp_X_add_one (n : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer S (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer S (n + 1) + (n + 1) • (ascPochhammer S n).comp (X + 1) := by
suffices (ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1)).comp (X + 1) =
ascPochhammer ℕ (n + 1) + (n + 1) * (ascPochhammer ℕ n).comp (X + 1)
by simpa [map_comp] using congr_arg (Polynomial.map (Nat.castRingHom S)) this
nth_rw 2 [ascPochhammer_succ_left]
rw [← add_mul, ascPochhammer_succ_right ℕ n, mul_comp, mul_comm, add_comp, X_comp, natCast_comp,
add_comm, ← add_assoc]
ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align pochhammer_succ_comp_X_add_one ascPochhammer_succ_comp_X_add_one
theorem ascPochhammer_mul (n m : ℕ) :
ascPochhammer S n * (ascPochhammer S m).comp (X + (n : S[X])) = ascPochhammer S (n + m) := by
induction' m with m ih
· simp
· rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, Polynomial.mul_X_add_natCast_comp, ← mul_assoc, ih,
← add_assoc, ascPochhammer_succ_right, Nat.cast_add, add_assoc]
#align pochhammer_mul ascPochhammer_mul
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial (n : ℕ) :
∀ k, (ascPochhammer ℕ k).eval n = n.ascFactorial k
| 0 => by rw [ascPochhammer_zero, eval_one, Nat.ascFactorial_zero]
| t + 1 => by
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right, eval_mul, ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial n t, eval_add, eval_X,
eval_natCast, Nat.cast_id, Nat.ascFactorial_succ, mul_comm]
#align pochhammer_nat_eq_asc_factorial ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial
theorem ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial (a b : ℕ) :
(ascPochhammer ℕ b).eval a = (a + b - 1).descFactorial b := by
rw [ascPochhammer_nat_eq_ascFactorial, Nat.add_descFactorial_eq_ascFactorial']
#align pochhammer_nat_eq_desc_factorial ascPochhammer_nat_eq_descFactorial
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Pochhammer.lean | 178 | 187 | theorem ascPochhammer_natDegree (n : ℕ) [NoZeroDivisors S] [Nontrivial S] :
(ascPochhammer S n).natDegree = n := by |
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· have : natDegree (X + (n : S[X])) = 1 := natDegree_X_add_C (n : S)
rw [ascPochhammer_succ_right,
natDegree_mul _ (ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| this.symm ▸ Nat.zero_lt_one), hn, this]
cases n
· simp
· refine ne_zero_of_natDegree_gt <| hn.symm ▸ Nat.add_one_pos _
|
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Bitwise
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Symmetric
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.zpow from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"03fda9112aa6708947da13944a19310684bfdfcb"
open Matrix
namespace Matrix
variable {n' : Type*} [DecidableEq n'] [Fintype n'] {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
local notation "M" => Matrix n' n' R
noncomputable instance : DivInvMonoid M :=
{ show Monoid M by infer_instance, show Inv M by infer_instance with }
section ZPow
open Int
@[simp]
theorem one_zpow : ∀ n : ℤ, (1 : M) ^ n = 1
| (n : ℕ) => by rw [zpow_natCast, one_pow]
| -[n+1] => by rw [zpow_negSucc, one_pow, inv_one]
#align matrix.one_zpow Matrix.one_zpow
theorem zero_zpow : ∀ z : ℤ, z ≠ 0 → (0 : M) ^ z = 0
| (n : ℕ), h => by
rw [zpow_natCast, zero_pow]
exact mod_cast h
| -[n+1], _ => by simp [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero]
#align matrix.zero_zpow Matrix.zero_zpow
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/ZPow.lean | 92 | 95 | theorem zero_zpow_eq (n : ℤ) : (0 : M) ^ n = if n = 0 then 1 else 0 := by |
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, zpow_zero]
· rw [zero_zpow _ h]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.