Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.rel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODOs
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop -- deriving CompleteLattice, Inhabited
#align rel Rel
-- Porting note: `deriving` above doesn't work.
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
-- Porting note: required for later theorems.
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
#align rel.inv Rel.inv
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.inv_def Rel.inv_def
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
#align rel.inv_inv Rel.inv_inv
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
#align rel.dom Rel.dom
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
#align rel.dom_mono Rel.dom_mono
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
#align rel.codom Rel.codom
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.codom_inv Rel.codom_inv
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.dom_inv Rel.dom_inv
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
#align rel.comp Rel.comp
-- Porting note: the original `∘` syntax can't be overloaded here, lean considers it ambiguous.
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
#align rel.comp_assoc Rel.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
#align rel.comp_right_id Rel.comp_right_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
#align rel.comp_left_id Rel.comp_left_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
#align rel.inv_id Rel.inv_id
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
#align rel.inv_comp Rel.inv_comp
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Bot.bot, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Top.top, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β := { y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y }
#align rel.image Rel.image
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.mem_image Rel.mem_image
theorem image_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.image r.image := fun _ _ h _ ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩ =>
⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
#align rel.image_subset Rel.image_subset
theorem image_mono : Monotone r.image :=
r.image_subset
#align rel.image_mono Rel.image_mono
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
#align rel.image_inter Rel.image_inter
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∪ t) = r.image s ∪ r.image t :=
le_antisymm
(fun _y ⟨x, xst, rxy⟩ =>
xst.elim (fun xs => Or.inl ⟨x, ⟨xs, rxy⟩⟩) fun xt => Or.inr ⟨x, ⟨xt, rxy⟩⟩)
(r.image_mono.le_map_sup s t)
#align rel.image_union Rel.image_union
@[simp]
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : image (@Eq α) s = s := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
#align rel.image_id Rel.image_id
theorem image_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set α) : image (r • s) t = image s (image r t) := by
ext z; simp only [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩; exact ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩
· rintro ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩; exact ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩
#align rel.image_comp Rel.image_comp
theorem image_univ : r.image Set.univ = r.codom := by
ext y
simp [mem_image, codom]
#align rel.image_univ Rel.image_univ
@[simp]
theorem image_empty : r.image ∅ = ∅ := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem image_bot (s : Set α) : (⊥ : Rel α β).image s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x h
simp [mem_image, Bot.bot] at h
@[simp]
theorem image_top {s : Set α} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).image s = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x ↦ ⟨h.some, by simp [h.some_mem, Top.top]⟩
/-- Preimage of a set under a relation `r`. Same as the image of `s` under `r.inv` -/
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
r.inv.image s
#align rel.preimage Rel.preimage
theorem mem_preimage (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ r.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.mem_preimage Rel.mem_preimage
theorem preimage_def (s : Set β) : preimage r s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, r x y } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_preimage _ _ _
#align rel.preimage_def Rel.preimage_def
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : r.preimage s ⊆ r.preimage t :=
image_mono _ h
#align rel.preimage_mono Rel.preimage_mono
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.preimage s ∩ r.preimage t :=
image_inter _ s t
#align rel.preimage_inter Rel.preimage_inter
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∪ t) = r.preimage s ∪ r.preimage t :=
image_union _ s t
#align rel.preimage_union Rel.preimage_union
theorem preimage_id (s : Set α) : preimage (@Eq α) s = s := by
simp only [preimage, inv_id, image_id]
#align rel.preimage_id Rel.preimage_id
theorem preimage_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set γ) :
preimage (r • s) t = preimage r (preimage s t) := by simp only [preimage, inv_comp, image_comp]
#align rel.preimage_comp Rel.preimage_comp
theorem preimage_univ : r.preimage Set.univ = r.dom := by rw [preimage, image_univ, codom_inv]
#align rel.preimage_univ Rel.preimage_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : r.preimage ∅ = ∅ := by rw [preimage, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inv (s : Set α) : r.inv.preimage s = r.image s := by rw [preimage, inv_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_bot (s : Set β) : (⊥ : Rel α β).preimage s = ∅ := by
rw [preimage, inv_bot, image_bot]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_top {s : Set β} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).preimage s = Set.univ := by rwa [← inv_top, preimage, inv_inv, image_top]
theorem image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset {s : Set β} (h : r.codom ⊆ s) : r.preimage s = r.dom := by
rw [← preimage_univ]
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· exact image_subset _ (Set.subset_univ _)
· intro x hx
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_univ, true_and] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ryx⟩
have hy : y ∈ s := h ⟨x, ryx⟩
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, ryx⟩⟩
theorem preimage_eq_codom_of_domain_subset {s : Set α} (h : r.dom ⊆ s) : r.image s = r.codom := by
apply r.inv.image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset (by rwa [← codom_inv] at h)
theorem image_inter_dom_eq (s : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ r.dom) = r.image s := by
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· apply r.image_mono (by simp)
· intro x h
rw [mem_image] at *
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, ryx⟩
use y
suffices h : y ∈ r.dom by simp_all only [Set.mem_inter_iff, and_self]
rw [dom, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
use x
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inter_codom_eq (s : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ r.codom) = r.preimage s := by
rw [← dom_inv, preimage, preimage, image_inter_dom_eq]
theorem inter_dom_subset_preimage_image (s : Set α) : s ∩ r.dom ⊆ r.preimage (r.image s) := by
intro x hx
simp only [Set.mem_inter_iff, dom] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨hx, ⟨y, rxy⟩⟩
use y
simp only [image, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact ⟨⟨x, hx, rxy⟩, rxy⟩
theorem image_preimage_subset_inter_codom (s : Set β) : s ∩ r.codom ⊆ r.image (r.preimage s) := by
rw [← dom_inv, ← preimage_inv]
apply inter_dom_subset_preimage_image
/-- Core of a set `s : Set β` w.r.t `r : Rel α β` is the set of `x : α` that are related *only*
to elements of `s`. Other generalization of `Function.preimage`. -/
def core (s : Set β) := { x | ∀ y, r x y → y ∈ s }
#align rel.core Rel.core
theorem mem_core (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ r.core s ↔ ∀ y, r x y → y ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.mem_core Rel.mem_core
theorem core_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.core r.core := fun _s _t h _x h' y rxy => h (h' y rxy)
#align rel.core_subset Rel.core_subset
theorem core_mono : Monotone r.core :=
r.core_subset
#align rel.core_mono Rel.core_mono
theorem core_inter (s t : Set β) : r.core (s ∩ t) = r.core s ∩ r.core t :=
Set.ext (by simp [mem_core, imp_and, forall_and])
#align rel.core_inter Rel.core_inter
theorem core_union (s t : Set β) : r.core s ∪ r.core t ⊆ r.core (s ∪ t) :=
r.core_mono.le_map_sup s t
#align rel.core_union Rel.core_union
@[simp]
theorem core_univ : r.core Set.univ = Set.univ :=
Set.ext (by simp [mem_core])
#align rel.core_univ Rel.core_univ
theorem core_id (s : Set α) : core (@Eq α) s = s := by simp [core]
#align rel.core_id Rel.core_id
theorem core_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set γ) : core (r • s) t = core r (core s t) := by
ext x; simp only [core, comp, forall_exists_index, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]; constructor
· exact fun h y rxy z => h z y rxy
· exact fun h z y rzy => h y rzy z
#align rel.core_comp Rel.core_comp
/-- Restrict the domain of a relation to a subtype. -/
def restrictDomain (s : Set α) : Rel { x // x ∈ s } β := fun x y => r x.val y
#align rel.restrict_domain Rel.restrictDomain
theorem image_subset_iff (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : image r s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ core r t :=
Iff.intro (fun h x xs _y rxy => h ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩) fun h y ⟨_x, xs, rxy⟩ => h xs y rxy
#align rel.image_subset_iff Rel.image_subset_iff
theorem image_core_gc : GaloisConnection r.image r.core :=
image_subset_iff _
#align rel.image_core_gc Rel.image_core_gc
end Rel
namespace Function
/-- The graph of a function as a relation. -/
def graph (f : α → β) : Rel α β := fun x y => f x = y
#align function.graph Function.graph
@[simp] lemma graph_def (f : α → β) (x y) : f.graph x y ↔ (f x = y) := Iff.rfl
theorem graph_injective : Injective (graph : (α → β) → Rel α β) := by
intro _ g h
ext x
have h2 := congr_fun₂ h x (g x)
simp only [graph_def, eq_iff_iff, iff_true] at h2
exact h2
@[simp] lemma graph_inj {f g : α → β} : f.graph = g.graph ↔ f = g := graph_injective.eq_iff
theorem graph_id : graph id = @Eq α := by simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [graph]
theorem graph_comp {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} : graph (f ∘ g) = Rel.comp (graph g) (graph f) := by
ext x y
simp [Rel.comp]
end Function
theorem Equiv.graph_inv (f : α ≃ β) : (f.symm : β → α).graph = Rel.inv (f : α → β).graph := by
ext x y
aesop (add norm Rel.inv_def)
theorem Relation.is_graph_iff (r : Rel α β) : (∃! f, Function.graph f = r) ↔ ∀ x, ∃! y, r x y := by
unfold Function.graph
constructor
· rintro ⟨f, rfl, _⟩ x
use f x
simp only [forall_eq', and_self]
· intro h
choose f hf using fun x ↦ (h x).exists
use f
constructor
· ext x _
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact hf x
· exact (h x).unique (hf x)
· rintro _ rfl
exact funext hf
namespace Set
theorem image_eq (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = (Function.graph f).image s := by
rfl
#align set.image_eq Set.image_eq
theorem preimage_eq (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f ⁻¹' s = (Function.graph f).preimage s := by
simp [Set.preimage, Rel.preimage, Rel.inv, flip, Rel.image]
#align set.preimage_eq Set.preimage_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 424 | 425 | theorem preimage_eq_core (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f ⁻¹' s = (Function.graph f).core s := by |
simp [Set.preimage, Rel.core]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
#align_import probability.kernel.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Markov Kernels
A kernel from a measurable space `α` to another measurable space `β` is a measurable map
`α → MeasureTheory.Measure β`, where the measurable space instance on `measure β` is the one defined
in `MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace`. That is, a kernel `κ` verifies that for all
measurable sets `s` of `β`, `a ↦ κ a s` is measurable.
## Main definitions
Classes of kernels:
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel α β`: kernels from `α` to `β`, defined as the `AddSubmonoid` of the
measurable functions in `α → Measure β`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel κ`: a kernel from `α` to `β` is said to be a Markov kernel
if for all `a : α`, `k a` is a probability measure.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel κ`: a kernel from `α` to `β` is said to be finite if there
exists `C : ℝ≥0∞` such that `C < ∞` and for all `a : α`, `κ a univ ≤ C`. This implies in
particular that all measures in the image of `κ` are finite, but is stronger since it requires a
uniform bound. This stronger condition is necessary to ensure that the composition of two finite
kernels is finite.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsSFiniteKernel κ`: a kernel is called s-finite if it is a countable
sum of finite kernels.
Particular kernels:
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f)`:
kernel `a ↦ Measure.dirac (f a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.const α (μβ : measure β)`: constant kernel `a ↦ μβ`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.restrict κ (hs : MeasurableSet s)`: kernel for which the image of
`a : α` is `(κ a).restrict s`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(kernel.restrict κ hs a) = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun`: if `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(κ a) = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂(η a)` for all measurable
functions `f` and all `a`, then the two kernels `κ` and `η` are equal.
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-- A kernel from a measurable space `α` to another measurable space `β` is a measurable function
`κ : α → Measure β`. The measurable space structure on `MeasureTheory.Measure β` is given by
`MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace`. A map `κ : α → MeasureTheory.Measure β` is measurable
iff `∀ s : Set β, MeasurableSet s → Measurable (fun a ↦ κ a s)`. -/
noncomputable def kernel (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
AddSubmonoid (α → Measure β) where
carrier := Measurable
zero_mem' := measurable_zero
add_mem' hf hg := Measurable.add hf hg
#align probability_theory.kernel ProbabilityTheory.kernel
-- Porting note: using `FunLike` instead of `CoeFun` to use `DFunLike.coe`
instance {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
FunLike (kernel α β) α (Measure β) where
coe := Subtype.val
coe_injective' := Subtype.val_injective
instance kernel.instCovariantAddLE {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
CovariantClass (kernel α β) (kernel α β) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hμ a ↦ add_le_add_left (hμ a) _⟩
noncomputable
instance kernel.instOrderBot {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
OrderBot (kernel α β) where
bot := 0
bot_le κ a := by simp only [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, Measure.zero_le]
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
namespace kernel
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : kernel α β) = 0 :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_fn_zero ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_add (κ η : kernel α β) : ⇑(κ + η) = κ + η :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_fn_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeFn_add
/-- Coercion to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
kernel α β →+ α → Measure β :=
AddSubmonoid.subtype _
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_add_hom ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (a : α) : (0 : kernel α β) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.zero_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.zero_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) : ⇑(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(κ i) :=
map_sum (coeAddHom α β) _ _
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_finset_sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) a = ∑ i ∈ I, κ i a := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align probability_theory.kernel.finset_sum_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.finset_sum_apply
theorem finset_sum_apply' (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) a s = ∑ i ∈ I, κ i a s := by rw [finset_sum_apply, Measure.finset_sum_apply]
#align probability_theory.kernel.finset_sum_apply' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.finset_sum_apply'
end kernel
/-- A kernel is a Markov kernel if every measure in its image is a probability measure. -/
class IsMarkovKernel (κ : kernel α β) : Prop where
isProbabilityMeasure : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a)
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel
/-- A kernel is finite if every measure in its image is finite, with a uniform bound. -/
class IsFiniteKernel (κ : kernel α β) : Prop where
exists_univ_le : ∃ C : ℝ≥0∞, C < ∞ ∧ ∀ a, κ a Set.univ ≤ C
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel
/-- A constant `C : ℝ≥0∞` such that `C < ∞` (`ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ`) and
for all `a : α` and `s : Set β`, `κ a s ≤ C` (`ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measure_le_bound κ a s`).
Porting note (#11215): TODO: does it make sense to
-- make `ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound` the least possible bound?
-- Should it be an `NNReal` number? -/
noncomputable def IsFiniteKernel.bound (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] : ℝ≥0∞ :=
h.exists_univ_le.choose
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound
theorem IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel.bound κ < ∞ :=
h.exists_univ_le.choose_spec.1
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound_lt_top ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top
theorem IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top (κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel.bound κ ≠ ∞ :=
(IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ).ne
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound_ne_top ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top
theorem kernel.measure_le_bound (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) (s : Set β) :
κ a s ≤ IsFiniteKernel.bound κ :=
(measure_mono (Set.subset_univ s)).trans (h.exists_univ_le.choose_spec.2 a)
#align probability_theory.kernel.measure_le_bound ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measure_le_bound
instance isFiniteKernel_zero (α β : Type*) {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} :
IsFiniteKernel (0 : kernel α β) :=
⟨⟨0, ENNReal.coe_lt_top, fun _ => by
simp only [kernel.zero_apply, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, le_zero_iff]⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel_zero ProbabilityTheory.isFiniteKernel_zero
instance IsFiniteKernel.add (κ η : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
IsFiniteKernel (κ + η) := by
refine ⟨⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound κ + IsFiniteKernel.bound η,
ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ, IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top η⟩,
fun a => ?_⟩⟩
exact add_le_add (kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _) (kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _)
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.add ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.add
lemma isFiniteKernel_of_le {κ ν : kernel α β} [hν : IsFiniteKernel ν] (hκν : κ ≤ ν) :
IsFiniteKernel κ := by
refine ⟨hν.bound, hν.bound_lt_top, fun a ↦ (hκν _ _).trans (kernel.measure_le_bound ν a Set.univ)⟩
variable {κ : kernel α β}
instance IsMarkovKernel.is_probability_measure' [IsMarkovKernel κ] (a : α) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a) :=
IsMarkovKernel.isProbabilityMeasure a
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel.is_probability_measure' ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel.is_probability_measure'
instance IsFiniteKernel.isFiniteMeasure [IsFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) : IsFiniteMeasure (κ a) :=
⟨(kernel.measure_le_bound κ a Set.univ).trans_lt (IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ)⟩
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.is_finite_measure ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.isFiniteMeasure
instance (priority := 100) IsMarkovKernel.isFiniteKernel [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel κ :=
⟨⟨1, ENNReal.one_lt_top, fun _ => prob_le_one⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel.is_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel.isFiniteKernel
namespace kernel
@[ext]
theorem ext {η : kernel α β} (h : ∀ a, κ a = η a) : κ = η := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext
theorem ext_iff {η : kernel α β} : κ = η ↔ ∀ a, κ a = η a := DFunLike.ext_iff
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_iff ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_iff
theorem ext_iff' {η : kernel α β} :
κ = η ↔ ∀ a s, MeasurableSet s → κ a s = η a s := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, Measure.ext_iff]
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_iff' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_iff'
theorem ext_fun {η : kernel α β} (h : ∀ a f, Measurable f → ∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ a = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂η a) :
κ = η := by
ext a s hs
specialize h a (s.indicator fun _ => 1) (Measurable.indicator measurable_const hs)
simp_rw [lintegral_indicator_const hs, one_mul] at h
rw [h]
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun
theorem ext_fun_iff {η : kernel α β} :
κ = η ↔ ∀ a f, Measurable f → ∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ a = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂η a :=
⟨fun h a f _ => by rw [h], ext_fun⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_fun_iff ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun_iff
protected theorem measurable (κ : kernel α β) : Measurable κ :=
κ.prop
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable
protected theorem measurable_coe (κ : kernel α β) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun a => κ a s :=
(Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp (kernel.measurable κ)
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_coe ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_coe
lemma IsFiniteKernel.integrable (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x => (κ x s).toReal) μ := by
refine Integrable.mono' (integrable_const (IsFiniteKernel.bound κ).toReal)
((kernel.measurable_coe κ hs).ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable)
(ae_of_all μ fun x => ?_)
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (measure_ne_top _ _) (IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top _)]
exact kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _
lemma IsMarkovKernel.integrable (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(κ : kernel α β) [IsMarkovKernel κ] {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x => (κ x s).toReal) μ :=
IsFiniteKernel.integrable μ κ hs
section Sum
/-- Sum of an indexed family of kernels. -/
protected noncomputable def sum [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) : kernel α β where
val a := Measure.sum fun n => κ n a
property := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
exact Measurable.ennreal_tsum fun n => kernel.measurable_coe (κ n) hs
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum
theorem sum_apply [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) :
kernel.sum κ a = Measure.sum fun n => κ n a :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_apply
theorem sum_apply' [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
kernel.sum κ a s = ∑' n, κ n a s := by rw [sum_apply κ a, Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_apply' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_apply'
@[simp]
theorem sum_zero [Countable ι] : (kernel.sum fun _ : ι => (0 : kernel α β)) = 0 := by
ext a s hs
rw [sum_apply' _ a hs]
simp only [zero_apply, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, tsum_zero]
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_zero ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_zero
theorem sum_comm [Countable ι] (κ : ι → ι → kernel α β) :
(kernel.sum fun n => kernel.sum (κ n)) = kernel.sum fun m => kernel.sum fun n => κ n m := by
ext a s; simp_rw [sum_apply]; rw [Measure.sum_comm]
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_comm ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_comm
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) : kernel.sum κ = ∑ i, κ i := by
ext a s hs
simp only [sum_apply' κ a hs, finset_sum_apply' _ κ a s, tsum_fintype]
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_fintype ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_fintype
theorem sum_add [Countable ι] (κ η : ι → kernel α β) :
(kernel.sum fun n => κ n + η n) = kernel.sum κ + kernel.sum η := by
ext a s hs
simp only [coeFn_add, Pi.add_apply, sum_apply, Measure.sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply,
Measure.coe_add, tsum_add ENNReal.summable ENNReal.summable]
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_add
end Sum
section SFinite
/-- A kernel is s-finite if it can be written as the sum of countably many finite kernels. -/
class _root_.ProbabilityTheory.IsSFiniteKernel (κ : kernel α β) : Prop where
tsum_finite : ∃ κs : ℕ → kernel α β, (∀ n, IsFiniteKernel (κs n)) ∧ κ = kernel.sum κs
#align probability_theory.is_s_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsSFiniteKernel
instance (priority := 100) IsFiniteKernel.isSFiniteKernel [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] :
IsSFiniteKernel κ :=
⟨⟨fun n => if n = 0 then κ else 0, fun n => by
simp only; split_ifs
· exact h
· infer_instance, by
ext a s hs
rw [kernel.sum_apply' _ _ hs]
have : (fun i => ((ite (i = 0) κ 0) a) s) = fun i => ite (i = 0) (κ a s) 0 := by
ext1 i; split_ifs <;> rfl
rw [this, tsum_ite_eq]⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_finite_kernel.is_s_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IsFiniteKernel.isSFiniteKernel
/-- A sequence of finite kernels such that `κ = ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum (seq κ)`. See
`ProbabilityTheory.kernel.isFiniteKernel_seq` and `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.kernel_sum_seq`. -/
noncomputable def seq (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsSFiniteKernel κ] : ℕ → kernel α β :=
h.tsum_finite.choose
#align probability_theory.kernel.seq ProbabilityTheory.kernel.seq
theorem kernel_sum_seq (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsSFiniteKernel κ] : kernel.sum (seq κ) = κ :=
h.tsum_finite.choose_spec.2.symm
#align probability_theory.kernel.kernel_sum_seq ProbabilityTheory.kernel.kernel_sum_seq
theorem measure_sum_seq (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsSFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) :
(Measure.sum fun n => seq κ n a) = κ a := by rw [← kernel.sum_apply, kernel_sum_seq κ]
#align probability_theory.kernel.measure_sum_seq ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measure_sum_seq
instance isFiniteKernel_seq (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsSFiniteKernel κ] (n : ℕ) :
IsFiniteKernel (kernel.seq κ n) :=
h.tsum_finite.choose_spec.1 n
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_finite_kernel_seq ProbabilityTheory.kernel.isFiniteKernel_seq
instance IsSFiniteKernel.sFinite [IsSFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) : SFinite (κ a) :=
⟨⟨fun n ↦ seq κ n a, inferInstance, (measure_sum_seq κ a).symm⟩⟩
instance IsSFiniteKernel.add (κ η : kernel α β) [IsSFiniteKernel κ] [IsSFiniteKernel η] :
IsSFiniteKernel (κ + η) := by
refine ⟨⟨fun n => seq κ n + seq η n, fun n => inferInstance, ?_⟩⟩
rw [sum_add, kernel_sum_seq κ, kernel_sum_seq η]
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_s_finite_kernel.add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IsSFiniteKernel.add
theorem IsSFiniteKernel.finset_sum {κs : ι → kernel α β} (I : Finset ι)
(h : ∀ i ∈ I, IsSFiniteKernel (κs i)) : IsSFiniteKernel (∑ i ∈ I, κs i) := by
classical
induction' I using Finset.induction with i I hi_nmem_I h_ind h
· rw [Finset.sum_empty]; infer_instance
· rw [Finset.sum_insert hi_nmem_I]
haveI : IsSFiniteKernel (κs i) := h i (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _)
have : IsSFiniteKernel (∑ x ∈ I, κs x) :=
h_ind fun i hiI => h i (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hiI)
exact IsSFiniteKernel.add _ _
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_s_finite_kernel.finset_sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.IsSFiniteKernel.finset_sum
theorem isSFiniteKernel_sum_of_denumerable [Denumerable ι] {κs : ι → kernel α β}
(hκs : ∀ n, IsSFiniteKernel (κs n)) : IsSFiniteKernel (kernel.sum κs) := by
let e : ℕ ≃ ι × ℕ := (Denumerable.eqv (ι × ℕ)).symm
refine ⟨⟨fun n => seq (κs (e n).1) (e n).2, inferInstance, ?_⟩⟩
have hκ_eq : kernel.sum κs = kernel.sum fun n => kernel.sum (seq (κs n)) := by
simp_rw [kernel_sum_seq]
ext a s hs
rw [hκ_eq]
simp_rw [kernel.sum_apply' _ _ hs]
change (∑' i, ∑' m, seq (κs i) m a s) = ∑' n, (fun im : ι × ℕ => seq (κs im.fst) im.snd a s) (e n)
rw [e.tsum_eq (fun im : ι × ℕ => seq (κs im.fst) im.snd a s),
tsum_prod' ENNReal.summable fun _ => ENNReal.summable]
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_s_finite_kernel_sum_of_denumerable ProbabilityTheory.kernel.isSFiniteKernel_sum_of_denumerable
theorem isSFiniteKernel_sum [Countable ι] {κs : ι → kernel α β}
(hκs : ∀ n, IsSFiniteKernel (κs n)) : IsSFiniteKernel (kernel.sum κs) := by
cases fintypeOrInfinite ι
· rw [sum_fintype]
exact IsSFiniteKernel.finset_sum Finset.univ fun i _ => hκs i
cases nonempty_denumerable ι
exact isSFiniteKernel_sum_of_denumerable hκs
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_s_finite_kernel_sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.isSFiniteKernel_sum
end SFinite
section Deterministic
/-- Kernel which to `a` associates the dirac measure at `f a`. This is a Markov kernel. -/
noncomputable def deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f) : kernel α β where
val a := Measure.dirac (f a)
property := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
exact measurable_one.indicator (hf hs)
#align probability_theory.kernel.deterministic ProbabilityTheory.kernel.deterministic
theorem deterministic_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
deterministic f hf a = Measure.dirac (f a) :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.deterministic_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.deterministic_apply
theorem deterministic_apply' {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : deterministic f hf a s = s.indicator (fun _ => 1) (f a) := by
rw [deterministic]
change Measure.dirac (f a) s = s.indicator 1 (f a)
simp_rw [Measure.dirac_apply' _ hs]
#align probability_theory.kernel.deterministic_apply' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.deterministic_apply'
instance isMarkovKernel_deterministic {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) :
IsMarkovKernel (deterministic f hf) :=
⟨fun a => by rw [deterministic_apply hf]; infer_instance⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.is_markov_kernel_deterministic ProbabilityTheory.kernel.isMarkovKernel_deterministic
theorem lintegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂kernel.deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [kernel.deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac' _ hf]
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_deterministic' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_deterministic'
@[simp]
theorem lintegral_deterministic {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
[MeasurableSingletonClass β] : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂kernel.deterministic g hg a = f (g a) := by
rw [kernel.deterministic_apply, lintegral_dirac (g a) f]
#align probability_theory.kernel.lintegral_deterministic ProbabilityTheory.kernel.lintegral_deterministic
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean | 414 | 417 | theorem set_lintegral_deterministic' {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {g : α → β} {a : α} (hg : Measurable g)
(hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) [Decidable (g a ∈ s)] :
∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂kernel.deterministic g hg a = if g a ∈ s then f (g a) else 0 := by |
rw [kernel.deterministic_apply, set_lintegral_dirac' hf hs]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sort
#align_import data.polynomial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"949dc57e616a621462062668c9f39e4e17b64b69"
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
This file defines `Polynomial R`, the type of univariate polynomials over the semiring `R`, builds
a semiring structure on it, and gives basic definitions that are expanded in other files in this
directory.
## Main definitions
* `monomial n a` is the polynomial `a X^n`. Note that `monomial n` is defined as an `R`-linear map.
* `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`. Note that `C` is defined as a ring homomorphism.
* `X` is the polynomial `X`, i.e., `monomial 1 1`.
* `p.sum f` is `∑ n ∈ p.support, f n (p.coeff n)`, i.e., one sums the values of functions applied
to coefficients of the polynomial `p`.
* `p.erase n` is the polynomial `p` in which one removes the `c X^n` term.
There are often two natural variants of lemmas involving sums, depending on whether one acts on the
polynomials, or on the function. The naming convention is that one adds `index` when acting on
the polynomials. For instance,
* `sum_add_index` states that `(p + q).sum f = p.sum f + q.sum f`;
* `sum_add` states that `p.sum (fun n x ↦ f n x + g n x) = p.sum f + p.sum g`.
* Notation to refer to `Polynomial R`, as `R[X]` or `R[t]`.
## Implementation
Polynomials are defined using `R[ℕ]`, where `R` is a semiring.
The variable `X` commutes with every polynomial `p`: lemma `X_mul` proves the identity
`X * p = p * X`. The relationship to `R[ℕ]` is through a structure
to make polynomials irreducible from the point of view of the kernel. Most operations
are irreducible since Lean can not compute anyway with `AddMonoidAlgebra`. There are two
exceptions that we make semireducible:
* The zero polynomial, so that its coefficients are definitionally equal to `0`.
* The scalar action, to permit typeclass search to unfold it to resolve potential instance
diamonds.
The raw implementation of the equivalence between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]` is
done through `ofFinsupp` and `toFinsupp` (or, equivalently, `rcases p` when `p` is a polynomial
gives an element `q` of `R[ℕ]`, and conversely `⟨q⟩` gives back `p`). The
equivalence is also registered as a ring equiv in `Polynomial.toFinsuppIso`. These should
in general not be used once the basic API for polynomials is constructed.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
noncomputable section
/-- `Polynomial R` is the type of univariate polynomials over `R`.
Polynomials should be seen as (semi-)rings with the additional constructor `X`.
The embedding from `R` is called `C`. -/
structure Polynomial (R : Type*) [Semiring R] where ofFinsupp ::
toFinsupp : AddMonoidAlgebra R ℕ
#align polynomial Polynomial
#align polynomial.of_finsupp Polynomial.ofFinsupp
#align polynomial.to_finsupp Polynomial.toFinsupp
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Polynomial] notation:9000 R "[X]" => Polynomial R
open AddMonoidAlgebra
open Finsupp hiding single
open Function hiding Commute
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u
variable {R : Type u} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem forall_iff_forall_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∀ p, P p) ↔ ∀ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun h q => h ⟨q⟩, fun h ⟨p⟩ => h p⟩
#align polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp Polynomial.forall_iff_forall_finsupp
theorem exists_iff_exists_finsupp (P : R[X] → Prop) :
(∃ p, P p) ↔ ∃ q : R[ℕ], P ⟨q⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨p⟩, hp⟩ => ⟨p, hp⟩, fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨⟨q⟩, hq⟩⟩
#align polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp Polynomial.exists_iff_exists_finsupp
@[simp]
theorem eta (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.ofFinsupp f.toFinsupp = f := by cases f; rfl
#align polynomial.eta Polynomial.eta
/-! ### Conversions to and from `AddMonoidAlgebra`
Since `R[X]` is not defeq to `R[ℕ]`, but instead is a structure wrapping
it, we have to copy across all the arithmetic operators manually, along with the lemmas about how
they unfold around `Polynomial.ofFinsupp` and `Polynomial.toFinsupp`.
-/
section AddMonoidAlgebra
private irreducible_def add : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : R[X] → R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
instance zero : Zero R[X] :=
⟨⟨0⟩⟩
#align polynomial.has_zero Polynomial.zero
instance one : One R[X] :=
⟨⟨1⟩⟩
#align polynomial.one Polynomial.one
instance add' : Add R[X] :=
⟨add⟩
#align polynomial.has_add Polynomial.add'
instance neg' {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Neg R[X] :=
⟨neg⟩
#align polynomial.has_neg Polynomial.neg'
instance sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] : Sub R[X] :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
#align polynomial.has_sub Polynomial.sub
instance mul' : Mul R[X] :=
⟨mul⟩
#align polynomial.has_mul Polynomial.mul'
-- If the private definitions are accidentally exposed, simplify them away.
@[simp] theorem add_eq_add : add p q = p + q := rfl
@[simp] theorem mul_eq_mul : mul p q = p * q := rfl
instance smulZeroClass {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] : SMulZeroClass S R[X] where
smul r p := ⟨r • p.toFinsupp⟩
smul_zero a := congr_arg ofFinsupp (smul_zero a)
#align polynomial.smul_zero_class Polynomial.smulZeroClass
-- to avoid a bug in the `ring` tactic
instance (priority := 1) pow : Pow R[X] ℕ where pow p n := npowRec n p
#align polynomial.has_pow Polynomial.pow
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_zero : (⟨0⟩ : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_one : (⟨1⟩ : R[X]) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_add {a b} : (⟨a + b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = add _ _ by rw [add_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_add Polynomial.ofFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a} : (⟨-a⟩ : R[X]) = -⟨a⟩ :=
show _ = neg _ by rw [neg_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_neg Polynomial.ofFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] {a b} : (⟨a - b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofFinsupp_add, ofFinsupp_neg]
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sub Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
show _ = mul _ _ by rw [mul_def]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_mul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b) :
(⟨a • b⟩ : R[X]) = (a • ⟨b⟩ : R[X]) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_smul Polynomial.ofFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_pow (a) (n : ℕ) : (⟨a ^ n⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨a⟩ ^ n := by
change _ = npowRec n _
induction n with
| zero => simp [npowRec]
| succ n n_ih => simp [npowRec, n_ih, pow_succ]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_pow Polynomial.ofFinsupp_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_zero : (0 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_one : (1 : R[X]).toFinsupp = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_one
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_add (a b : R[X]) : (a + b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp + b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_add]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_add Polynomial.toFinsupp_add
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_neg {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a : R[X]) : (-a).toFinsupp = -a.toFinsupp := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_neg]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_neg Polynomial.toFinsupp_neg
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_sub {R : Type u} [Ring R] (a b : R[X]) :
(a - b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp - b.toFinsupp := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← toFinsupp_neg, ← toFinsupp_add]
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sub Polynomial.toFinsupp_sub
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_mul (a b : R[X]) : (a * b).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp * b.toFinsupp := by
cases a
cases b
rw [← ofFinsupp_mul]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_mul Polynomial.toFinsupp_mul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (b : R[X]) :
(a • b).toFinsupp = a • b.toFinsupp :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_smul Polynomial.toFinsupp_smul
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_pow (a : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (a ^ n).toFinsupp = a.toFinsupp ^ n := by
cases a
rw [← ofFinsupp_pow]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_pow Polynomial.toFinsupp_pow
theorem _root_.IsSMulRegular.polynomial {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] {a : S}
(ha : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsSMulRegular R[X] a
| ⟨_x⟩, ⟨_y⟩, h => congr_arg _ <| ha.finsupp (Polynomial.ofFinsupp.inj h)
#align is_smul_regular.polynomial IsSMulRegular.polynomial
theorem toFinsupp_injective : Function.Injective (toFinsupp : R[X] → AddMonoidAlgebra _ _) :=
fun ⟨_x⟩ ⟨_y⟩ => congr_arg _
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_injective Polynomial.toFinsupp_injective
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_inj {a b : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = b.toFinsupp ↔ a = b :=
toFinsupp_injective.eq_iff
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_inj Polynomial.toFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_zero {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_zero, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_eq_one {a : R[X]} : a.toFinsupp = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by
rw [← toFinsupp_one, toFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.toFinsupp_eq_one
/-- A more convenient spelling of `Polynomial.ofFinsupp.injEq` in terms of `Iff`. -/
theorem ofFinsupp_inj {a b} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = ⟨b⟩ ↔ a = b :=
iff_of_eq (ofFinsupp.injEq _ _)
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_inj Polynomial.ofFinsupp_inj
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_zero {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ofFinsupp_zero, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_zero Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_eq_one {a} : (⟨a⟩ : R[X]) = 1 ↔ a = 1 := by rw [← ofFinsupp_one, ofFinsupp_inj]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_eq_one Polynomial.ofFinsupp_eq_one
instance inhabited : Inhabited R[X] :=
⟨0⟩
#align polynomial.inhabited Polynomial.inhabited
instance instNatCast : NatCast R[X] where natCast n := ofFinsupp n
#align polynomial.has_nat_cast Polynomial.instNatCast
instance semiring : Semiring R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.semiring toFinsupp toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_zero toFinsupp_one
toFinsupp_add toFinsupp_mul (fun _ _ => toFinsupp_smul _ _) toFinsupp_pow fun _ => rfl with
toAdd := Polynomial.add'
toMul := Polynomial.mul'
toZero := Polynomial.zero
toOne := Polynomial.one
nsmul := (· • ·)
npow := fun n x => (x ^ n) }
#align polynomial.semiring Polynomial.semiring
instance distribSMul {S} [DistribSMul S R] : DistribSMul S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribSMul ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toSMulZeroClass := Polynomial.smulZeroClass }
#align polynomial.distrib_smul Polynomial.distribSMul
instance distribMulAction {S} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] : DistribMulAction S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero (R := R)⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩
toFinsupp_injective toFinsupp_smul with
toSMul := Polynomial.smulZeroClass.toSMul }
#align polynomial.distrib_mul_action Polynomial.distribMulAction
instance faithfulSMul {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [FaithfulSMul S R] : FaithfulSMul S R[X] where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_s₁ _s₂} h :=
eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun a : ℕ →₀ R => congr_arg toFinsupp (h ⟨a⟩)
#align polynomial.has_faithful_smul Polynomial.faithfulSMul
instance module {S} [Semiring S] [Module S R] : Module S R[X] :=
--TODO: add reference to library note in PR #7432
{ Function.Injective.module _ ⟨⟨toFinsupp, toFinsupp_zero⟩, toFinsupp_add⟩ toFinsupp_injective
toFinsupp_smul with
toDistribMulAction := Polynomial.distribMulAction }
#align polynomial.module Polynomial.module
instance smulCommClass {S₁ S₂} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R] [SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R] :
SMulCommClass S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro m n ⟨f⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_comm m n f]⟩
#align polynomial.smul_comm_class Polynomial.smulCommClass
instance isScalarTower {S₁ S₂} [SMul S₁ S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] [SMulZeroClass S₂ R]
[IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R] : IsScalarTower S₁ S₂ R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower Polynomial.isScalarTower
instance isScalarTower_right {α K : Type*} [Semiring K] [DistribSMul α K] [IsScalarTower α K K] :
IsScalarTower α K[X] K[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩;
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, ← ofFinsupp_mul, ← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_mul_assoc]⟩
#align polynomial.is_scalar_tower_right Polynomial.isScalarTower_right
instance isCentralScalar {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] [SMulZeroClass Sᵐᵒᵖ R] [IsCentralScalar S R] :
IsCentralScalar S R[X] :=
⟨by
rintro _ ⟨⟩
simp_rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, op_smul_eq_smul]⟩
#align polynomial.is_central_scalar Polynomial.isCentralScalar
instance unique [Subsingleton R] : Unique R[X] :=
{ Polynomial.inhabited with
uniq := by
rintro ⟨x⟩
apply congr_arg ofFinsupp
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton] }
#align polynomial.unique Polynomial.unique
variable (R)
/-- Ring isomorphism between `R[X]` and `R[ℕ]`. This is just an
implementation detail, but it can be useful to transfer results from `Finsupp` to polynomials. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def toFinsuppIso : R[X] ≃+* R[ℕ] where
toFun := toFinsupp
invFun := ofFinsupp
left_inv := fun ⟨_p⟩ => rfl
right_inv _p := rfl
map_mul' := toFinsupp_mul
map_add' := toFinsupp_add
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso Polynomial.toFinsuppIso
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_apply
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_iso_symm_apply Polynomial.toFinsuppIso_symm_apply
instance [DecidableEq R] : DecidableEq R[X] :=
@Equiv.decidableEq R[X] _ (toFinsuppIso R).toEquiv (Finsupp.instDecidableEq)
end AddMonoidAlgebra
theorem ofFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[ℕ]) :
(⟨∑ i ∈ s, f i⟩ : R[X]) = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟨f i⟩ :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R).symm f s
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_sum Polynomial.ofFinsupp_sum
theorem toFinsupp_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i : R[X]).toFinsupp = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).toFinsupp :=
map_sum (toFinsuppIso R) f s
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_sum Polynomial.toFinsupp_sum
/-- The set of all `n` such that `X^n` has a non-zero coefficient.
-/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: The original generated theorem is same to `support_ofFinsupp` and
-- the new generated theorem is different, so this attribute should be
-- removed.
def support : R[X] → Finset ℕ
| ⟨p⟩ => p.support
#align polynomial.support Polynomial.support
@[simp]
theorem support_ofFinsupp (p) : support (⟨p⟩ : R[X]) = p.support := by rw [support]
#align polynomial.support_of_finsupp Polynomial.support_ofFinsupp
theorem support_toFinsupp (p : R[X]) : p.toFinsupp.support = p.support := by rw [support]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : R[X]).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align polynomial.support_zero Polynomial.support_zero
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
simp [support]
#align polynomial.support_eq_empty Polynomial.support_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma support_nonempty : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans support_eq_empty.not
theorem card_support_eq_zero : p.support.card = 0 ↔ p = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.card_support_eq_zero Polynomial.card_support_eq_zero
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial `a * X^s` -/
def monomial (n : ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun t := ⟨Finsupp.single n t⟩
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp`.
map_add' x y := by simp; rw [ofFinsupp_add]
-- porting note (#10745): was `simp [← ofFinsupp_smul]`.
map_smul' r x := by simp; rw [← ofFinsupp_smul, smul_single']
#align polynomial.monomial Polynomial.monomial
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (monomial n r).toFinsupp = Finsupp.single n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_monomial Polynomial.toFinsupp_monomial
@[simp]
theorem ofFinsupp_single (n : ℕ) (r : R) : (⟨Finsupp.single n r⟩ : R[X]) = monomial n r := by
simp [monomial]
#align polynomial.of_finsupp_single Polynomial.ofFinsupp_single
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem monomial_zero_right (n : ℕ) : monomial n (0 : R) = 0 :=
(monomial n).map_zero
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_right Polynomial.monomial_zero_right
-- This is not a `simp` lemma as `monomial_zero_left` is more general.
theorem monomial_zero_one : monomial 0 (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_one Polynomial.monomial_zero_one
-- TODO: can't we just delete this one?
theorem monomial_add (n : ℕ) (r s : R) : monomial n (r + s) = monomial n r + monomial n s :=
(monomial n).map_add _ _
#align polynomial.monomial_add Polynomial.monomial_add
theorem monomial_mul_monomial (n m : ℕ) (r s : R) :
monomial n r * monomial m s = monomial (n + m) (r * s) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by
simp only [toFinsupp_monomial, toFinsupp_mul, AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial Polynomial.monomial_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) : monomial n r ^ k = monomial (n * k) (r ^ k) := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp [pow_zero, monomial_zero_one]
· simp [pow_succ, ih, monomial_mul_monomial, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_add, add_comm]
#align polynomial.monomial_pow Polynomial.monomial_pow
theorem smul_monomial {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (a : S) (n : ℕ) (b : R) :
a • monomial n b = monomial n (a • b) :=
toFinsupp_injective <| by simp; rw [smul_single]
#align polynomial.smul_monomial Polynomial.smul_monomial
theorem monomial_injective (n : ℕ) : Function.Injective (monomial n : R → R[X]) :=
(toFinsuppIso R).symm.injective.comp (single_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_injective Polynomial.monomial_injective
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero_iff (t : R) (n : ℕ) : monomial n t = 0 ↔ t = 0 :=
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (Polynomial.monomial_injective n)
#align polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.monomial_eq_zero_iff
theorem support_add : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support := by
simpa [support] using Finsupp.support_add
#align polynomial.support_add Polynomial.support_add
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial `a`.
`C` is provided as a ring homomorphism.
-/
def C : R →+* R[X] :=
{ monomial 0 with
map_one' := by simp [monomial_zero_one]
map_mul' := by simp [monomial_mul_monomial]
map_zero' := by simp }
#align polynomial.C Polynomial.C
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero_left (a : R) : monomial 0 a = C a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_zero_left Polynomial.monomial_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_C (a : R) : (C a).toFinsupp = single 0 a :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_C Polynomial.toFinsupp_C
theorem C_0 : C (0 : R) = 0 := by simp
#align polynomial.C_0 Polynomial.C_0
theorem C_1 : C (1 : R) = 1 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.C_1 Polynomial.C_1
theorem C_mul : C (a * b) = C a * C b :=
C.map_mul a b
#align polynomial.C_mul Polynomial.C_mul
theorem C_add : C (a + b) = C a + C b :=
C.map_add a b
#align polynomial.C_add Polynomial.C_add
@[simp]
theorem smul_C {S} [SMulZeroClass S R] (s : S) (r : R) : s • C r = C (s • r) :=
smul_monomial _ _ r
#align polynomial.smul_C Polynomial.smul_C
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit0 : C (bit0 a) = bit0 (C a) :=
C_add
#align polynomial.C_bit0 Polynomial.C_bit0
set_option linter.deprecated false in
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_bit1 : C (bit1 a) = bit1 (C a) := by simp [bit1, C_bit0]
#align polynomial.C_bit1 Polynomial.C_bit1
theorem C_pow : C (a ^ n) = C a ^ n :=
C.map_pow a n
#align polynomial.C_pow Polynomial.C_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem C_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : C (n : R) = (n : R[X]) :=
map_natCast C n
#align polynomial.C_eq_nat_cast Polynomial.C_eq_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias C_eq_nat_cast := C_eq_natCast
@[simp]
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial n b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, zero_add]
#align polynomial.C_mul_monomial Polynomial.C_mul_monomial
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_C : monomial n a * C b = monomial n (a * b) := by
simp only [← monomial_zero_left, monomial_mul_monomial, add_zero]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_C Polynomial.monomial_mul_C
/-- `X` is the polynomial variable (aka indeterminate). -/
def X : R[X] :=
monomial 1 1
#align polynomial.X Polynomial.X
theorem monomial_one_one_eq_X : monomial 1 (1 : R) = X :=
rfl
#align polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X Polynomial.monomial_one_one_eq_X
theorem monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow (n : ℕ) : monomial n (1 : R) = X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp [monomial_zero_one]
· rw [pow_succ, ← ih, ← monomial_one_one_eq_X, monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_one_right_eq_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem toFinsupp_X : X.toFinsupp = Finsupp.single 1 (1 : R) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.to_finsupp_X Polynomial.toFinsupp_X
/-- `X` commutes with everything, even when the coefficients are noncommutative. -/
theorem X_mul : X * p = p * X := by
rcases p with ⟨⟩
-- Porting note: `ofFinsupp.injEq` is required.
simp only [X, ← ofFinsupp_single, ← ofFinsupp_mul, LinearMap.coe_mk, ofFinsupp.injEq]
-- Porting note: Was `ext`.
refine Finsupp.ext fun _ => ?_
simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply, AddMonoidAlgebra.sum_single_index, add_comm]
#align polynomial.X_mul Polynomial.X_mul
theorem X_pow_mul {n : ℕ} : X ^ n * p = p * X ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· conv_lhs => rw [pow_succ]
rw [mul_assoc, X_mul, ← mul_assoc, ih, mul_assoc, ← pow_succ]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul Polynomial.X_pow_mul
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `Polynomial.X_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_mul_C (r : R) : X * C r = C r * X :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.X_mul_C Polynomial.X_mul_C
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_C (r : R) (n : ℕ) : X ^ n * C r = C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_C
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc {n : ℕ} : p * X ^ n * q = p * q * X ^ n := by
rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, ← mul_assoc]
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc
/-- Prefer putting constants to the left of `X ^ n`.
This lemma is the loop-avoiding `simp` version of `X_pow_mul_assoc`. -/
@[simp]
theorem X_pow_mul_assoc_C {n : ℕ} (r : R) : p * X ^ n * C r = p * C r * X ^ n :=
X_pow_mul_assoc
#align polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C Polynomial.X_pow_mul_assoc_C
theorem commute_X (p : R[X]) : Commute X p :=
X_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X Polynomial.commute_X
theorem commute_X_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : Commute (X ^ n) p :=
X_pow_mul
#align polynomial.commute_X_pow Polynomial.commute_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X (n : ℕ) (r : R) : monomial n r * X = monomial (n + 1) r := by
erw [monomial_mul_monomial, mul_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X Polynomial.monomial_mul_X
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul_X_pow (n : ℕ) (r : R) (k : ℕ) :
monomial n r * X ^ k = monomial (n + k) r := by
induction' k with k ih
· simp
· simp [ih, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, add_assoc, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
#align polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow Polynomial.monomial_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Basic.lean | 658 | 659 | theorem X_mul_monomial (n : ℕ) (r : R) : X * monomial n r = monomial (n + 1) r := by |
rw [X_mul, monomial_mul_X]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Aut
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
#align_import group_theory.semidirect_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Semidirect product
This file defines semidirect products of groups, and the canonical maps in and out of the
semidirect product. The semidirect product of `N` and `G` given a hom `φ` from
`G` to the automorphism group of `N` is the product of sets with the group
`⟨n₁, g₁⟩ * ⟨n₂, g₂⟩ = ⟨n₁ * φ g₁ n₂, g₁ * g₂⟩`
## Key definitions
There are two homs into the semidirect product `inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G` and
`inr : G →* N ⋊[φ] G`, and `lift` can be used to define maps `N ⋊[φ] G →* H`
out of the semidirect product given maps `f₁ : N →* H` and `f₂ : G →* H` that satisfy the
condition `∀ n g, f₁ (φ g n) = f₂ g * f₁ n * f₂ g⁻¹`
## Notation
This file introduces the global notation `N ⋊[φ] G` for `SemidirectProduct N G φ`
## Tags
group, semidirect product
-/
variable (N : Type*) (G : Type*) {H : Type*} [Group N] [Group G] [Group H]
/-- The semidirect product of groups `N` and `G`, given a map `φ` from `G` to the automorphism
group of `N`. It the product of sets with the group operation
`⟨n₁, g₁⟩ * ⟨n₂, g₂⟩ = ⟨n₁ * φ g₁ n₂, g₁ * g₂⟩` -/
@[ext]
structure SemidirectProduct (φ : G →* MulAut N) where
/-- The element of N -/
left : N
/-- The element of G -/
right : G
deriving DecidableEq
#align semidirect_product SemidirectProduct
-- Porting note: these lemmas are autogenerated by the inductive definition and are not
-- in simple form due to the existence of mk_eq_inl_mul_inr
attribute [nolint simpNF] SemidirectProduct.mk.injEq
attribute [nolint simpNF] SemidirectProduct.mk.sizeOf_spec
-- Porting note: unknown attribute
-- attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] SemidirectProduct
@[inherit_doc]
notation:35 N " ⋊[" φ:35 "] " G:35 => SemidirectProduct N G φ
namespace SemidirectProduct
variable {N G}
variable {φ : G →* MulAut N}
instance : Mul (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
mul a b := ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩
lemma mul_def (a b : SemidirectProduct N G φ) : a * b = ⟨a.1 * φ a.2 b.1, a.2 * b.2⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_left (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).left = a.left * φ a.right b.left := rfl
#align semidirect_product.mul_left SemidirectProduct.mul_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_right (a b : N ⋊[φ] G) : (a * b).right = a.right * b.right := rfl
#align semidirect_product.mul_right SemidirectProduct.mul_right
instance : One (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where one := ⟨1, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_left : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.one_left SemidirectProduct.one_left
@[simp]
theorem one_right : (1 : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.one_right SemidirectProduct.one_right
instance : Inv (SemidirectProduct N G φ) where
inv x := ⟨φ x.2⁻¹ x.1⁻¹, x.2⁻¹⟩
@[simp]
theorem inv_left (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.left = φ a.right⁻¹ a.left⁻¹ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.inv_left SemidirectProduct.inv_left
@[simp]
theorem inv_right (a : N ⋊[φ] G) : a⁻¹.right = a.right⁻¹ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.inv_right SemidirectProduct.inv_right
instance : Group (N ⋊[φ] G) where
mul_assoc a b c := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp [mul_assoc]) (by simp [mul_assoc])
one_mul a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (one_mul a.2)
mul_one a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (mul_one _)
mul_left_inv a := SemidirectProduct.ext _ _ (by simp) (by simp)
instance : Inhabited (N ⋊[φ] G) := ⟨1⟩
/-- The canonical map `N →* N ⋊[φ] G` sending `n` to `⟨n, 1⟩` -/
def inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun n := ⟨n, 1⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;>
simp only [mul_left, map_one, MulAut.one_apply, mul_right, mul_one]
#align semidirect_product.inl SemidirectProduct.inl
@[simp]
theorem left_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).left = n := rfl
#align semidirect_product.left_inl SemidirectProduct.left_inl
@[simp]
theorem right_inl (n : N) : (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G).right = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_inl SemidirectProduct.right_inl
theorem inl_injective : Function.Injective (inl : N → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨left, left_inl⟩
#align semidirect_product.inl_injective SemidirectProduct.inl_injective
@[simp]
theorem inl_inj {n₁ n₂ : N} : (inl n₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n₂ ↔ n₁ = n₂ :=
inl_injective.eq_iff
#align semidirect_product.inl_inj SemidirectProduct.inl_inj
/-- The canonical map `G →* N ⋊[φ] G` sending `g` to `⟨1, g⟩` -/
def inr : G →* N ⋊[φ] G where
toFun g := ⟨1, g⟩
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := by intros; ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inr SemidirectProduct.inr
@[simp]
theorem left_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).left = 1 := rfl
#align semidirect_product.left_inr SemidirectProduct.left_inr
@[simp]
theorem right_inr (g : G) : (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G).right = g := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_inr SemidirectProduct.right_inr
theorem inr_injective : Function.Injective (inr : G → N ⋊[φ] G) :=
Function.injective_iff_hasLeftInverse.2 ⟨right, right_inr⟩
#align semidirect_product.inr_injective SemidirectProduct.inr_injective
@[simp]
theorem inr_inj {g₁ g₂ : G} : (inr g₁ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g₂ ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
inr_injective.eq_iff
#align semidirect_product.inr_inj SemidirectProduct.inr_inj
theorem inl_aut (g : G) (n : N) : (inl (φ g n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g * inl n * inr g⁻¹ := by
ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inl_aut SemidirectProduct.inl_aut
theorem inl_aut_inv (g : G) (n : N) : (inl ((φ g)⁻¹ n) : N ⋊[φ] G) = inr g⁻¹ * inl n * inr g := by
rw [← MonoidHom.map_inv, inl_aut, inv_inv]
#align semidirect_product.inl_aut_inv SemidirectProduct.inl_aut_inv
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_inl_mul_inr (g : G) (n : N) : (⟨n, g⟩ : N ⋊[φ] G) = inl n * inr g := by ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.mk_eq_inl_mul_inr SemidirectProduct.mk_eq_inl_mul_inr
@[simp]
theorem inl_left_mul_inr_right (x : N ⋊[φ] G) : inl x.left * inr x.right = x := by ext <;> simp
#align semidirect_product.inl_left_mul_inr_right SemidirectProduct.inl_left_mul_inr_right
/-- The canonical projection map `N ⋊[φ] G →* G`, as a group hom. -/
def rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G where
toFun := SemidirectProduct.right
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_hom SemidirectProduct.rightHom
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_eq_right : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) = right := rfl
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_eq_right SemidirectProduct.rightHom_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inl : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inl = 1 := by ext; simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_comp_inl SemidirectProduct.rightHom_comp_inl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_comp_inr : (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G →* G).comp inr = MonoidHom.id _ := by
ext; simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_comp_inr SemidirectProduct.rightHom_comp_inr
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inl (n : N) : rightHom (inl n : N ⋊[φ] G) = 1 := by simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_inl SemidirectProduct.rightHom_inl
@[simp]
theorem rightHom_inr (g : G) : rightHom (inr g : N ⋊[φ] G) = g := by simp [rightHom]
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_inr SemidirectProduct.rightHom_inr
theorem rightHom_surjective : Function.Surjective (rightHom : N ⋊[φ] G → G) :=
Function.surjective_iff_hasRightInverse.2 ⟨inr, rightHom_inr⟩
#align semidirect_product.right_hom_surjective SemidirectProduct.rightHom_surjective
theorem range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom : (inl : N →* N ⋊[φ] G).range = rightHom.ker :=
le_antisymm (fun _ ↦ by simp (config := { contextual := true }) [MonoidHom.mem_ker, eq_comm])
fun x hx ↦ ⟨x.left, by ext <;> simp_all [MonoidHom.mem_ker]⟩
#align semidirect_product.range_inl_eq_ker_right_hom SemidirectProduct.range_inl_eq_ker_rightHom
section lift
variable (f₁ : N →* H) (f₂ : G →* H)
(h : ∀ g, f₁.comp (φ g).toMonoidHom = (MulAut.conj (f₂ g)).toMonoidHom.comp f₁)
/-- Define a group hom `N ⋊[φ] G →* H`, by defining maps `N →* H` and `G →* H` -/
def lift (f₁ : N →* H) (f₂ : G →* H)
(h : ∀ g, f₁.comp (φ g).toMonoidHom = (MulAut.conj (f₂ g)).toMonoidHom.comp f₁) :
N ⋊[φ] G →* H where
toFun a := f₁ a.1 * f₂ a.2
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' a b := by
have := fun n g ↦ DFunLike.ext_iff.1 (h n) g
simp only [MulAut.conj_apply, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MulEquiv.coe_toMonoidHom] at this
simp only [mul_left, mul_right, map_mul, this, mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel_left]
#align semidirect_product.lift SemidirectProduct.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_inl (n : N) : lift f₁ f₂ h (inl n) = f₁ n := by simp [lift]
#align semidirect_product.lift_inl SemidirectProduct.lift_inl
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_inl : (lift f₁ f₂ h).comp inl = f₁ := by ext; simp
#align semidirect_product.lift_comp_inl SemidirectProduct.lift_comp_inl
@[simp]
theorem lift_inr (g : G) : lift f₁ f₂ h (inr g) = f₂ g := by simp [lift]
#align semidirect_product.lift_inr SemidirectProduct.lift_inr
@[simp]
theorem lift_comp_inr : (lift f₁ f₂ h).comp inr = f₂ := by ext; simp
#align semidirect_product.lift_comp_inr SemidirectProduct.lift_comp_inr
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/SemidirectProduct.lean | 243 | 247 | theorem lift_unique (F : N ⋊[φ] G →* H) :
F = lift (F.comp inl) (F.comp inr) fun _ ↦ by ext; simp [inl_aut] := by |
rw [DFunLike.ext_iff]
simp only [lift, MonoidHom.comp_apply, MonoidHom.coe_mk, OneHom.coe_mk, ← map_mul,
inl_left_mul_inr_right, forall_const]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Abelian
#align_import algebra.lie.tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"657df4339ae6ceada048c8a2980fb10e393143ec"
/-!
# Tensor products of Lie modules
Tensor products of Lie modules carry natural Lie module structures.
## Tags
lie module, tensor product, universal property
-/
suppress_compilation
universe u v w w₁ w₂ w₃
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R]
open LieModule
namespace TensorProduct
open scoped TensorProduct
namespace LieModule
variable {L : Type v} {M : Type w} {N : Type w₁} {P : Type w₂} {Q : Type w₃}
variable [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
variable [AddCommGroup N] [Module R N] [LieRingModule L N] [LieModule R L N]
variable [AddCommGroup P] [Module R P] [LieRingModule L P] [LieModule R L P]
variable [AddCommGroup Q] [Module R Q] [LieRingModule L Q] [LieModule R L Q]
attribute [local ext] TensorProduct.ext
/-- It is useful to define the bracket via this auxiliary function so that we have a type-theoretic
expression of the fact that `L` acts by linear endomorphisms. It simplifies the proofs in
`lieRingModule` below. -/
def hasBracketAux (x : L) : Module.End R (M ⊗[R] N) :=
(toEnd R L M x).rTensor N + (toEnd R L N x).lTensor M
#align tensor_product.lie_module.has_bracket_aux TensorProduct.LieModule.hasBracketAux
/-- The tensor product of two Lie modules is a Lie ring module. -/
instance lieRingModule : LieRingModule L (M ⊗[R] N) where
bracket x := hasBracketAux x
add_lie x y t := by
simp only [hasBracketAux, LinearMap.lTensor_add, LinearMap.rTensor_add, LieHom.map_add,
LinearMap.add_apply]
abel
lie_add x := LinearMap.map_add _
leibniz_lie x y t := by
suffices (hasBracketAux x).comp (hasBracketAux y) =
hasBracketAux ⁅x, y⁆ + (hasBracketAux y).comp (hasBracketAux x) by
simp only [← LinearMap.add_apply]; rw [← LinearMap.comp_apply, this]; rfl
ext m n
simp only [hasBracketAux, AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply, sub_tmul, tmul_sub,
LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars, Function.comp_apply, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, LieHom.map_lie, toEnd_apply_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.map_add, LieHom.lie_apply, Module.End.lie_apply, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul]
abel
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lie_ring_module TensorProduct.LieModule.lieRingModule
/-- The tensor product of two Lie modules is a Lie module. -/
instance lieModule : LieModule R L (M ⊗[R] N) where
smul_lie c x t := by
change hasBracketAux (c • x) _ = c • hasBracketAux _ _
simp only [hasBracketAux, smul_add, LinearMap.rTensor_smul, LinearMap.smul_apply,
LinearMap.lTensor_smul, LieHom.map_smul, LinearMap.add_apply]
lie_smul c x := LinearMap.map_smul _ c
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lie_module TensorProduct.LieModule.lieModule
@[simp]
theorem lie_tmul_right (x : L) (m : M) (n : N) : ⁅x, m ⊗ₜ[R] n⁆ = ⁅x, m⁆ ⊗ₜ n + m ⊗ₜ ⁅x, n⁆ :=
show hasBracketAux x (m ⊗ₜ[R] n) = _ by
simp only [hasBracketAux, LinearMap.rTensor_tmul, toEnd_apply_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.lTensor_tmul]
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lie_tmul_right TensorProduct.LieModule.lie_tmul_right
variable (R L M N P Q)
/-- The universal property for tensor product of modules of a Lie algebra: the `R`-linear
tensor-hom adjunction is equivariant with respect to the `L` action. -/
def lift : (M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P :=
{ TensorProduct.lift.equiv R M N P with
map_lie' := fun {x f} => by
ext m n
simp only [AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, LinearEquiv.coe_coe,
AlgebraTensorModule.curry_apply, curry_apply, LinearMap.coe_restrictScalars,
lift.equiv_apply, LieHom.lie_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, lie_tmul_right, map_add]
abel }
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lift TensorProduct.LieModule.lift
@[simp]
theorem lift_apply (f : M →ₗ[R] N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) : lift R L M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lift_apply TensorProduct.LieModule.lift_apply
/-- A weaker form of the universal property for tensor product of modules of a Lie algebra.
Note that maps `f` of type `M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N →ₗ[R] P` are exactly those `R`-bilinear maps satisfying
`⁅x, f m n⁆ = f ⁅x, m⁆ n + f m ⁅x, n⁆` for all `x, m, n` (see e.g, `LieModuleHom.map_lie₂`). -/
def liftLie : (M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N →ₗ[R] P) ≃ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P :=
maxTrivLinearMapEquivLieModuleHom.symm ≪≫ₗ ↑(maxTrivEquiv (lift R L M N P)) ≪≫ₗ
maxTrivLinearMapEquivLieModuleHom
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lift_lie TensorProduct.LieModule.liftLie
@[simp]
theorem coe_liftLie_eq_lift_coe (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N →ₗ[R] P) :
⇑(liftLie R L M N P f) = lift R L M N P f := by
suffices (liftLie R L M N P f : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P) = lift R L M N P f by
rw [← this, LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap]
ext m n
simp only [liftLie, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LieModuleEquiv.coe_to_linearEquiv,
coe_linearMap_maxTrivLinearMapEquivLieModuleHom, coe_maxTrivEquiv_apply,
coe_linearMap_maxTrivLinearMapEquivLieModuleHom_symm]
#align tensor_product.lie_module.coe_lift_lie_eq_lift_coe TensorProduct.LieModule.coe_liftLie_eq_lift_coe
theorem liftLie_apply (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ N →ₗ[R] P) (m : M) (n : N) :
liftLie R L M N P f (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m n := by
simp only [coe_liftLie_eq_lift_coe, LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, lift_apply]
#align tensor_product.lie_module.lift_lie_apply TensorProduct.LieModule.liftLie_apply
variable {R L M N P Q}
/-- A pair of Lie module morphisms `f : M → P` and `g : N → Q`, induce a Lie module morphism:
`M ⊗ N → P ⊗ Q`. -/
nonrec def map (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P) (g : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ Q) : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P ⊗[R] Q :=
{ map (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) with
map_lie' := fun {x t} => by
simp only [LinearMap.toFun_eq_coe]
refine t.induction_on ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [LinearMap.map_zero, lie_zero]
· intro m n
simp only [LieModuleHom.coe_toLinearMap, lie_tmul_right, LieModuleHom.map_lie, map_tmul,
LinearMap.map_add]
· intro t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂; simp only [ht₁, ht₂, lie_add, LinearMap.map_add] }
#align tensor_product.lie_module.map TensorProduct.LieModule.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_linearMap_map (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P) (g : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ Q) :
(map f g : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] P ⊗[R] Q) = TensorProduct.map (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (g : N →ₗ[R] Q) :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lie_module.coe_linear_map_map TensorProduct.LieModule.coe_linearMap_map
@[simp]
nonrec theorem map_tmul (f : M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ P) (g : N →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ Q) (m : M) (n : N) :
map f g (m ⊗ₜ n) = f m ⊗ₜ g n :=
map_tmul _ _ _ _
#align tensor_product.lie_module.map_tmul TensorProduct.LieModule.map_tmul
/-- Given Lie submodules `M' ⊆ M` and `N' ⊆ N`, this is the natural map: `M' ⊗ N' → M ⊗ N`. -/
def mapIncl (M' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L N) : M' ⊗[R] N' →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M ⊗[R] N :=
map M'.incl N'.incl
#align tensor_product.lie_module.map_incl TensorProduct.LieModule.mapIncl
@[simp]
theorem mapIncl_def (M' : LieSubmodule R L M) (N' : LieSubmodule R L N) :
mapIncl M' N' = map M'.incl N'.incl :=
rfl
#align tensor_product.lie_module.map_incl_def TensorProduct.LieModule.mapIncl_def
end LieModule
end TensorProduct
namespace LieModule
open scoped TensorProduct
variable (R) (L : Type v) (M : Type w)
variable [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
variable [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
/-- The action of the Lie algebra on one of its modules, regarded as a morphism of Lie modules. -/
def toModuleHom : L ⊗[R] M →ₗ⁅R,L⁆ M :=
TensorProduct.LieModule.liftLie R L L M M
{ (toEnd R L M : L →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] M) with
map_lie' := fun {x m} => by ext n; simp [LieRing.of_associative_ring_bracket] }
#align lie_module.to_module_hom LieModule.toModuleHom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/TensorProduct.lean | 189 | 191 | theorem toModuleHom_apply (x : L) (m : M) : toModuleHom R L M (x ⊗ₜ m) = ⁅x, m⁆ := by |
simp only [toModuleHom, TensorProduct.LieModule.liftLie_apply, LieModuleHom.coe_mk,
LinearMap.coe_mk, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, LieHom.coe_toLinearMap, toEnd_apply_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Roberto Alvarez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Roberto Alvarez
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.FundamentalGroupoid.FundamentalGroup
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.EckmannHilton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.TransferInstance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Ext
#align_import topology.homotopy.homotopy_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c3e1721c58ef9087bbc2c8c38b540f70eda2e53"
/-!
# `n`th homotopy group
We define the `n`th homotopy group at `x : X`, `π_n X x`, as the equivalence classes
of functions from the `n`-dimensional cube to the topological space `X`
that send the boundary to the base point `x`, up to homotopic equivalence.
Note that such functions are generalized loops `GenLoop (Fin n) x`; in particular
`GenLoop (Fin 1) x ≃ Path x x`.
We show that `π_0 X x` is equivalent to the path-connected components, and
that `π_1 X x` is equivalent to the fundamental group at `x`.
We provide a group instance using path composition and show commutativity when `n > 1`.
## definitions
* `GenLoop N x` is the type of continuous functions `I^N → X` that send the boundary to `x`,
* `HomotopyGroup.Pi n X x` denoted `π_ n X x` is the quotient of `GenLoop (Fin n) x` by
homotopy relative to the boundary,
* group instance `Group (π_(n+1) X x)`,
* commutative group instance `CommGroup (π_(n+2) X x)`.
TODO:
* `Ω^M (Ω^N X) ≃ₜ Ω^(M⊕N) X`, and `Ω^M X ≃ₜ Ω^N X` when `M ≃ N`. Similarly for `π_`.
* Path-induced homomorphisms. Show that `HomotopyGroup.pi1EquivFundamentalGroup`
is a group isomorphism.
* Examples with `𝕊^n`: `π_n (𝕊^n) = ℤ`, `π_m (𝕊^n)` trivial for `m < n`.
* Actions of π_1 on π_n.
* Lie algebra: `⁅π_(n+1), π_(m+1)⁆` contained in `π_(n+m+1)`.
-/
open scoped unitInterval Topology
open Homeomorph
noncomputable section
scoped[Topology] notation "I^" N => N → I
namespace Cube
/-- The points in a cube with at least one projection equal to 0 or 1. -/
def boundary (N : Type*) : Set (I^N) :=
{y | ∃ i, y i = 0 ∨ y i = 1}
#align cube.boundary Cube.boundary
variable {N : Type*} [DecidableEq N]
/-- The forward direction of the homeomorphism
between the cube $I^N$ and $I × I^{N\setminus\{j\}}$. -/
abbrev splitAt (i : N) : (I^N) ≃ₜ I × I^{ j // j ≠ i } :=
funSplitAt I i
#align cube.split_at Cube.splitAt
/-- The backward direction of the homeomorphism
between the cube $I^N$ and $I × I^{N\setminus\{j\}}$. -/
abbrev insertAt (i : N) : (I × I^{ j // j ≠ i }) ≃ₜ I^N :=
(funSplitAt I i).symm
#align cube.insert_at Cube.insertAt
theorem insertAt_boundary (i : N) {t₀ : I} {t}
(H : (t₀ = 0 ∨ t₀ = 1) ∨ t ∈ boundary { j // j ≠ i }) : insertAt i ⟨t₀, t⟩ ∈ boundary N := by
obtain H | ⟨j, H⟩ := H
· use i; rwa [funSplitAt_symm_apply, dif_pos rfl]
· use j; rwa [funSplitAt_symm_apply, dif_neg j.prop, Subtype.coe_eta]
#align cube.insert_at_boundary Cube.insertAt_boundary
end Cube
variable (N X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] (x : X)
/-- The space of paths with both endpoints equal to a specified point `x : X`. -/
abbrev LoopSpace :=
Path x x
#align loop_space LoopSpace
scoped[Topology.Homotopy] notation "Ω" => LoopSpace
instance LoopSpace.inhabited : Inhabited (Path x x) :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
#align loop_space.inhabited LoopSpace.inhabited
/-- The `n`-dimensional generalized loops based at `x` in a space `X` are
continuous functions `I^n → X` that sends the boundary to `x`.
We allow an arbitrary indexing type `N` in place of `Fin n` here. -/
def GenLoop : Set C(I^N, X) :=
{p | ∀ y ∈ Cube.boundary N, p y = x}
#align gen_loop GenLoop
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Topology.Homotopy] notation "Ω^" => GenLoop
open Topology.Homotopy
variable {N X x}
namespace GenLoop
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Ω^ N X x) (I^N) X where
coe f := f.1
coe_injective' := fun ⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩ ⟨⟨g, _⟩, _⟩ _ => by congr
#align gen_loop.fun_like GenLoop.instFunLike
@[ext]
theorem ext (f g : Ω^ N X x) (H : ∀ y, f y = g y) : f = g :=
DFunLike.coe_injective' (funext H)
#align gen_loop.ext GenLoop.ext
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (f : C(I^N, X)) (H y) : (⟨f, H⟩ : Ω^ N X x) y = f y :=
rfl
#align gen_loop.mk_apply GenLoop.mk_apply
/-- Copy of a `GenLoop` with a new map from the unit cube equal to the old one.
Useful to fix definitional equalities. -/
def copy (f : Ω^ N X x) (g : (I^N) → X) (h : g = f) : Ω^ N X x :=
⟨⟨g, h.symm ▸ f.1.2⟩, by convert f.2⟩
#align gen_loop.copy GenLoop.copy
/- porting note: this now requires the `instFunLike` instance,
so the instance is now put before `copy`. -/
theorem coe_copy (f : Ω^ N X x) {g : (I^N) → X} (h : g = f) : ⇑(copy f g h) = g :=
rfl
#align gen_loop.coe_copy GenLoop.coe_copy
| Mathlib/Topology/Homotopy/HomotopyGroup.lean | 138 | 140 | theorem copy_eq (f : Ω^ N X x) {g : (I^N) → X} (h : g = f) : copy f g h = f := by |
ext x
exact congr_fun h x
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.fin.interval from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d29de43a5ba4662dd33b5cfeecfc2a27a5a8a29"
/-!
# Finite intervals in `Fin n`
This file proves that `Fin n` is a `LocallyFiniteOrder` and calculates the cardinality of its
intervals as Finsets and Fintypes.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace Fin
variable {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup : ↑(a ⊔ b) = (a ⊔ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_sup Fin.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf : ↑(a ⊓ b) = (a ⊓ b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_inf Fin.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_max : ↑(max a b) = (max a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_max Fin.coe_max
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_min : ↑(min a b) = (min a b : ℕ) := rfl
#align fin.coe_min Fin.coe_min
end Fin
open Finset Fin Function
namespace Fin
variable (n : ℕ)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrder Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderBot : LocallyFiniteOrderBot (Fin n) :=
OrderIso.locallyFiniteOrderBot Fin.orderIsoSubtype
instance instLocallyFiniteOrderTop : ∀ n, LocallyFiniteOrderTop (Fin n)
| 0 => IsEmpty.toLocallyFiniteOrderTop
| _ + 1 => inferInstance
variable {n} (a b : Fin n)
theorem Icc_eq_finset_subtype : Icc a b = (Icc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Icc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ico_eq_finset_subtype : Ico a b = (Ico (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ico_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioc_eq_finset_subtype : Ioc a b = (Ioc (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioc_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioo_eq_finset_subtype : Ioo a b = (Ioo (a : ℕ) b).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioo_eq_finset_subtype
theorem uIcc_eq_finset_subtype : uIcc a b = (uIcc (a : ℕ) b).fin n := rfl
#align fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype Fin.uIcc_eq_finset_subtype
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Icc : (Icc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Icc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Icc Fin.map_valEmbedding_Icc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ico : (Ico a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ico ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ico_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ico Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ico
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioc : (Ioc a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioc ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ioc_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map, Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ioc Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem map_valEmbedding_Ioo : (Ioo a b).map Fin.valEmbedding = Ioo ↑a ↑b := by
simp [Ioo_eq_finset_subtype, Finset.fin, Finset.map_map]
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_Ioo Fin.map_valEmbedding_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem map_subtype_embedding_uIcc : (uIcc a b).map valEmbedding = uIcc ↑a ↑b :=
map_valEmbedding_Icc _ _
#align fin.map_subtype_embedding_uIcc Fin.map_subtype_embedding_uIcc
@[simp]
theorem card_Icc : (Icc a b).card = b + 1 - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Icc, ← map_valEmbedding_Icc, card_map]
#align fin.card_Icc Fin.card_Icc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ico : (Ico a b).card = b - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ico, ← map_valEmbedding_Ico, card_map]
#align fin.card_Ico Fin.card_Ico
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioc : (Ioc a b).card = b - a := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ioc, ← map_valEmbedding_Ioc, card_map]
#align fin.card_Ioc Fin.card_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem card_Ioo : (Ioo a b).card = b - a - 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_Ioo, ← map_valEmbedding_Ioo, card_map]
#align fin.card_Ioo Fin.card_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem card_uIcc : (uIcc a b).card = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.card_uIcc, ← map_subtype_embedding_uIcc, card_map]
#align fin.card_uIcc Fin.card_uIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIcc : Fintype.card (Set.Icc a b) = b + 1 - a := by
rw [← card_Icc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align fin.card_fintype_Icc Fin.card_fintypeIcc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIco : Fintype.card (Set.Ico a b) = b - a := by
rw [← card_Ico, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align fin.card_fintype_Ico Fin.card_fintypeIco
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoc : Fintype.card (Set.Ioc a b) = b - a := by
rw [← card_Ioc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align fin.card_fintype_Ioc Fin.card_fintypeIoc
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem card_fintypeIoo : Fintype.card (Set.Ioo a b) = b - a - 1 := by
rw [← card_Ioo, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align fin.card_fintype_Ioo Fin.card_fintypeIoo
theorem card_fintype_uIcc : Fintype.card (Set.uIcc a b) = (b - a : ℤ).natAbs + 1 := by
rw [← card_uIcc, Fintype.card_ofFinset]
#align fin.card_fintype_uIcc Fin.card_fintype_uIcc
theorem Ici_eq_finset_subtype : Ici a = (Icc (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by
ext
simp
#align fin.Ici_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ici_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Ioi_eq_finset_subtype : Ioi a = (Ioc (a : ℕ) n).fin n := by
ext
simp
#align fin.Ioi_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Ioi_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Iic_eq_finset_subtype : Iic b = (Iic (b : ℕ)).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Iic_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Iic_eq_finset_subtype
theorem Iio_eq_finset_subtype : Iio b = (Iio (b : ℕ)).fin n :=
rfl
#align fin.Iio_eq_finset_subtype Fin.Iio_eq_finset_subtype
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Fin.lean | 175 | 186 | theorem map_valEmbedding_Ici : (Ici a).map Fin.valEmbedding = Icc ↑a (n - 1) := by |
-- Porting note: without `clear b` Lean includes `b` in the statement (because the `rfl`) in the
-- `rintro` below acts on it.
clear b
ext x
simp only [exists_prop, Embedding.coe_subtype, mem_Ici, mem_map, mem_Icc]
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨hx, Nat.le_sub_of_add_le <| x.2⟩
cases n
· exact Fin.elim0 a
· exact fun hx => ⟨⟨x, Nat.lt_succ_iff.2 hx.2⟩, hx.1, rfl⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
#align_import category_theory.limits.fubini from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59382264386afdbaf1727e617f5fdda511992eb9"
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [SmallCategory K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.conePoints
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurry
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp;
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones_inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramOfConesInhabited
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits_cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints
variable [HasLimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasLimit (F ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) := by
let c := limit.cone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsLimit c := limit.isLimit _
let G := DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (G.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
have Q' := coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit Q P
have Q'' := limit.isLimit (F ⋙ lim)
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
dsimp [limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso, IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π
end
section
variable (F)
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed colimits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the colimit cocone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cocone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits : DiagramOfCocones F where
obj j := colimit.cocone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := colim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfCoconesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCocones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits_coconePoints :
(DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F).coconePoints = F ⋙ colim :=
rfl
variable [HasColimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasColimit (F ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) := by
let c := colimit.cocone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsColimit c := colimit.isColimit _
let G := DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (G.obj j) := fun j => colimit.isColimit _
have Q' := coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit Q P
have Q'' := colimit.isColimit (F ⋙ colim)
exact IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_inv {j} {k} :
colimit.ι (F.obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv =
colimit.ι (uncurry.obj F) (j, k) := by
dsimp [colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso,
IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ (j, k) ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ (colimit (F ⋙ colim))) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv]
simp
end
section
variable (F) [HasLimitsOfShape J C] [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
-- With only moderate effort these could be derived if needed:
variable [HasLimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasLimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The limit of `F.flip ⋙ lim` is isomorphic to the limit of `F ⋙ lim`. -/
noncomputable def limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim : limit (F.flip ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) :=
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _).symm ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π (j) (k) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k =
(limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π (k) (j) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π
end
section
variable (F) [HasColimitsOfShape J C] [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasColimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasColimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The colimit of `F.flip ⋙ colim` is isomorphic to the colimit of `F ⋙ colim`. -/
noncomputable def colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (F.flip ⋙ colim) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) :=
(colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _).symm ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_hom (j) (k) :
colimit.ι (F.flip.obj k) j ≫ colimit.ι (F.flip ⋙ colim) k ≫
(colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (F⋙ colim)) := by
dsimp [colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_inv (k) (j) :
colimit.ι (F.obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j ≫
(colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim F).inv =
(colimit.ι _ j ≫ colimit.ι (F.flip ⋙ colim) k : _ ⟶ colimit (F.flip ⋙ colim)) := by
dsimp [colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
end
variable (G : J × K ⥤ C)
section
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasLimit G]
variable [HasLimit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `G` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `G.obj (j, _)`.
-/
noncomputable def limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim : limit G ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) := by
have i : G ≅ uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G) := currying.symm.unitIso.app G
haveI : Limits.HasLimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)) := hasLimitOfIso i
trans limit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G))
· apply HasLimit.isoOfNatIso i
· exact limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim, Trans.simple, HasLimit.isoOfNatIso, limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim]
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π
end
section
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasColimit G]
variable [HasColimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `G` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `G.obj (j, _)`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim : colimit G ≅ colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) := by
have i : G ≅ uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G) := currying.symm.unitIso.app G
haveI : Limits.HasColimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)) := hasColimitOfIso i.symm
trans colimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G))
· apply HasColimit.isoOfNatIso i
· exact colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim_ι_ι_inv {j} {k} :
colimit.ι ((curry.obj G).obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) j ≫
(colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).inv = colimit.ι _ (j, k) := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim, Trans.simple, HasColimit.isoOfNatIso,
colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ (j, k) ≫ (colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).hom =
(colimit.ι (_) k ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (_ ⋙ colim)) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).inv]
simp
end
section
variable [HasLimits C]
-- Certainly one could weaken the hypotheses here.
open CategoryTheory.prod
/-- A variant of the Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that $\lim_k \lim_j G(j,k) ≅ \lim_j \lim_k G(j,k)$.
-/
noncomputable def limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim :
limit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) :=
calc
limit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) :=
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim _).symm
_ ≅ limit G := HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding K J) (Iso.refl _)
_ ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) := limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim _
#align category_theory.limits.limit_curry_swap_comp_lim_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp]
theorem limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k =
(limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim]
simp only [Iso.refl_hom, Prod.braiding_counitIso_hom_app, Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π,
Iso.refl_inv, limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π, eqToIso_refl, Category.assoc]
erw [NatTrans.id_app]
-- Why can't `simp` do this?
dsimp
-- Porting note: the original proof only had `simp`.
-- However, now `CategoryTheory.Bifunctor.map_id` does not get used by `simp`
rw [CategoryTheory.Bifunctor.map_id]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_curry_swap_comp_lim_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp]
theorem limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).inv ≫ limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim]
simp only [Iso.refl_hom, Prod.braiding_counitIso_hom_app, Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_inv_π,
Iso.refl_inv, limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π, eqToIso_refl, Category.assoc]
erw [NatTrans.id_app]
-- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can do this in lean 4.
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_curry_swap_comp_lim_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_inv_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π_π
end
section
variable [HasColimits C]
open CategoryTheory.prod
/-- A variant of the Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that $\colim_k \colim_j G(j,k) ≅ \colim_j \colim_k G(j,k)$.
-/
noncomputable def colimitCurrySwapCompColimIsoColimitCurryCompColim :
colimit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ colim) ≅ colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) :=
calc
colimit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ colim) ≅ colimit (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) :=
(colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim _).symm
_ ≅ colimit G := HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding K J) (Iso.refl _)
_ ≅ colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) := colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 575 | 581 | theorem colimitCurrySwapCompColimIsoColimitCurryCompColim_ι_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ j ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ colim) k ≫
(colimitCurrySwapCompColimIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (curry.obj G⋙ colim)) := by |
dsimp [colimitCurrySwapCompColimIsoColimitCurryCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Inner product space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves the basic properties. We do not formally
define Hilbert spaces, but they can be obtained using the set of assumptions
`[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]`.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `RCLike` typeclass.
This file proves general results on inner product spaces. For the specific construction of an inner
product structure on `n → 𝕜` for `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`, see `EuclideanSpace` in
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2`.
## Main results
- We define the class `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` extending `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `RCLike` typeclass.
- We show that the inner product is continuous, `continuous_inner`, and bundle it as the
continuous sesquilinear map `innerSL` (see also `innerₛₗ` for the non-continuous version).
- We define `Orthonormal`, a predicate on a function `v : ι → E`, and prove the existence of a
maximal orthonormal set, `exists_maximal_orthonormal`. Bessel's inequality,
`Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le`, states that given an orthonormal set `v` and a vector `x`,
the sum of the norm-squares of the inner products `⟪v i, x⟫` is no more than the norm-square of
`x`. For the existence of orthonormal bases, Hilbert bases, etc., see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.projection`.
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `RealInnerProductSpace`, `ComplexInnerProductSpace`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the real and complex inner product.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
/-- The inner product function. -/
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
/-- The inner product with values in `𝕜`. -/
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
section Notations
/-- The inner product with values in `ℝ`. -/
scoped[RealInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℝ _ _ x y
/-- The inner product with values in `ℂ`. -/
scoped[ComplexInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℂ _ _ x y
end Notations
/-- An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `‖x‖^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`.
-/
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
/-- The inner product induces the norm. -/
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`InnerProductSpace.Core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `InnerProductSpace`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `Core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `InnerProductSpace` instance in `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`. -/
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is positive (semi)definite. -/
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is positive definite. -/
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
/- We set `InnerProductSpace.Core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
/-- Define `InnerProductSpace.Core` from `InnerProductSpace`. Defined to reuse lemmas about
`InnerProductSpace.Core` for `InnerProductSpace`s. Note that the `Norm` instance provided by
`InnerProductSpace.Core.norm` is propositionally but not definitionally equal to the original
norm. -/
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
/-- Inner product defined by the `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. We can't reuse
`InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner` because it takes `InnerProductSpace.Core` as an explicit
argument. -/
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
/-- The norm squared function for `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. -/
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.coe_norm_sq_eq_inner_self InnerProductSpace.Core.ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : F) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_re_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : F) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_im_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left];
simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_symm, RingHom.map_mul]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_right
theorem inner_zero_left (x : F) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left];
simp only [zero_mul, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_left
theorem inner_zero_right (x : F) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_right
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨c.definite _, by
rintro rfl
exact inner_zero_left _⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_zero
theorem normSq_eq_zero {x : F} : normSqF x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans
(by simp only [normSq, ext_iff, map_zero, inner_self_im, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff])
(@inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ x)
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_ne_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ne_zero
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : F) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_re_to_K InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ofReal_re
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 274 | 274 | theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by | rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
#align_import ring_theory.finiteness from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c813ed7de0f5115f956239124e9b30f3a621966f"
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Submodule.FG`, `Ideal.FG`
These express that some object is finitely generated as *submodule* over some base ring.
- `Module.Finite`, `RingHom.Finite`, `AlgHom.Finite`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as module* over some base ring.
## Main results
* `exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul` is Nakayama's lemma, in the following form:
if N is a finitely generated submodule of an ambient R-module M and I is an ideal of R
such that N ⊆ IN, then there exists r ∈ 1 + I such that rN = 0.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
namespace Submodule
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
open Set
/-- A submodule of `M` is finitely generated if it is the span of a finite subset of `M`. -/
def FG (N : Submodule R M) : Prop :=
∃ S : Finset M, Submodule.span R ↑S = N
#align submodule.fg Submodule.FG
theorem fg_def {N : Submodule R M} : N.FG ↔ ∃ S : Set M, S.Finite ∧ span R S = N :=
⟨fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨_, Finset.finite_toSet t, h⟩, by
rintro ⟨t', h, rfl⟩
rcases Finite.exists_finset_coe h with ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_def Submodule.fg_def
theorem fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg (P : Submodule ℕ M) : P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubmonoid.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_submonoid_fg Submodule.fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg
theorem fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (P : Submodule ℤ G) :
P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubgroup.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg Submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
rw [fg_def]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
exact ⟨range s, finite_range s, hs⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family Submodule.fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
rw [fg_def] at hn
rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
refine ⟨1, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [sub_self]
exact I.zero_mem
· rw [hs]
intro n hn
rw [mem_comap]
change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
rw [one_smul]
exact hin hn
· rw [← span_le, hs]
clear hin hs
revert this
refine Set.Finite.dinduction_on _ hfs (fun H => ?_) @fun i s _ _ ih H => ?_
· rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, _⟩
refine ⟨r, hr1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
specialize hrn hn
rwa [mem_comap, span_empty, smul_bot, mem_bot] at hrn
apply ih
rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, hs⟩
rw [← Set.singleton_union, span_union, smul_sup] at hrn
rw [Set.insert_subset_iff] at hs
have : ∃ c : R, c - 1 ∈ I ∧ c • i ∈ I • span R s := by
specialize hrn hs.1
rw [mem_comap, mem_sup] at hrn
rcases hrn with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz⟩
dsimp at hyz
rw [mem_smul_span_singleton] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨c, hci, rfl⟩
use r - c
constructor
· rw [sub_right_comm]
exact I.sub_mem hr1 hci
· rw [sub_smul, ← hyz, add_sub_cancel_left]
exact hz
rcases this with ⟨c, hc1, hci⟩
refine ⟨c * r, ?_, ?_, hs.2⟩
· simpa only [mul_sub, mul_one, sub_add_sub_cancel] using I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left c hr1) hc1
· intro n hn
specialize hrn hn
rw [mem_comap, mem_sup] at hrn
rcases hrn with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz⟩
dsimp at hyz
rw [mem_smul_span_singleton] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨d, _, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_comap, LinearMap.lsmul_apply]
rw [mul_smul, ← hyz, smul_add, smul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact add_mem (smul_mem _ _ hci) (smul_mem _ _ hz)
#align submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul Submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul
theorem exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
∃ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = n := by
obtain ⟨r, hr, hr'⟩ := exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul I N hn hin
exact ⟨-(r - 1), I.neg_mem hr, fun n hn => by simpa [sub_smul] using hr' n hn⟩
#align submodule.exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul Submodule.exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul
theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : Submodule R M).FG :=
⟨∅, by rw [Finset.coe_empty, span_empty]⟩
#align submodule.fg_bot Submodule.fg_bot
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_bot_toSubmodule {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] : (⊥ : Subalgebra R A).toSubmodule.FG :=
⟨{1}, by simp [Algebra.toSubmodule_bot, one_eq_span]⟩
#align subalgebra.fg_bot_to_submodule Subalgebra.fg_bot_toSubmodule
theorem fg_unit {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (I : (Submodule R A)ˣ) :
(I : Submodule R A).FG := by
have : (1 : A) ∈ (I * ↑I⁻¹ : Submodule R A) := by
rw [I.mul_inv]
exact one_le.mp le_rfl
obtain ⟨T, T', hT, hT', one_mem⟩ := mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul this
refine ⟨T, span_eq_of_le _ hT ?_⟩
rw [← one_mul I, ← mul_one (span R (T : Set A))]
conv_rhs => rw [← I.inv_mul, ← mul_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_left (le_trans ?_ <| mul_le_mul_right <| span_le.mpr hT')
simp only [Units.val_one, span_mul_span]
rwa [one_le]
#align submodule.fg_unit Submodule.fg_unit
theorem fg_of_isUnit {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {I : Submodule R A}
(hI : IsUnit I) : I.FG :=
fg_unit hI.unit
#align submodule.fg_of_is_unit Submodule.fg_of_isUnit
theorem fg_span {s : Set M} (hs : s.Finite) : FG (span R s) :=
⟨hs.toFinset, by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]⟩
#align submodule.fg_span Submodule.fg_span
theorem fg_span_singleton (x : M) : FG (R ∙ x) :=
fg_span (finite_singleton x)
#align submodule.fg_span_singleton Submodule.fg_span_singleton
theorem FG.sup {N₁ N₂ : Submodule R M} (hN₁ : N₁.FG) (hN₂ : N₂.FG) : (N₁ ⊔ N₂).FG :=
let ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ := fg_def.1 hN₁
let ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩ := fg_def.1 hN₂
fg_def.2 ⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, ht₁.1.union ht₂.1, by rw [span_union, ht₁.2, ht₂.2]⟩
#align submodule.fg.sup Submodule.FG.sup
theorem fg_finset_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (N i).FG) :
(s.sup N).FG :=
Finset.sup_induction fg_bot (fun _ ha _ hb => ha.sup hb) h
#align submodule.fg_finset_sup Submodule.fg_finset_sup
theorem fg_biSup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (N i).FG) :
(⨆ i ∈ s, N i).FG := by simpa only [Finset.sup_eq_iSup] using fg_finset_sup s N h
#align submodule.fg_bsupr Submodule.fg_biSup
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Finiteness.lean | 195 | 198 | theorem fg_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i, (N i).FG) :
(iSup N).FG := by |
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
simpa [iSup_plift_down] using fg_biSup Finset.univ (N ∘ PLift.down) fun i _ => h i.down
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Induction
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
/-!
# Scalar-multiple polynomial evaluation
This file defines polynomial evaluation via scalar multiplication. Our polynomials have
coefficients in a semiring `R`, and we evaluate at a weak form of `R`-algebra, namely an additive
commutative monoid with an action of `R` and a notion of natural number power. This
is a generalization of `Algebra.Polynomial.Eval`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.smeval`: function for evaluating a polynomial with coefficients in a `Semiring`
`R` at an element `x` of an `AddCommMonoid` `S` that has natural number powers and an `R`-action.
* `smeval.linearMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-linear map, when `S` is an `R`-module.
* `smeval.algebraMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-algebra map, when `S` is an `R`-algebra.
## Main results
* `smeval_monomial`: monomials evaluate as we expect.
* `smeval_add`, `smeval_smul`: linearity of evaluation, given an `R`-module.
* `smeval_mul`, `smeval_comp`: multiplicativity of evaluation, given power-associativity.
* `eval₂_eq_smeval`, `leval_eq_smeval.linearMap`, `aeval = smeval.algebraMap`, etc.: comparisons
## To do
* `smeval_neg` and `smeval_intCast` for `R` a ring and `S` an `AddCommGroup`.
* Nonunital evaluation for polynomials with vanishing constant term for `Pow S ℕ+` (different file?)
-/
namespace Polynomial
section MulActionWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (p : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ]
[MulActionWithZero R S] (x : S)
/-- Scalar multiplication together with taking a natural number power. -/
def smul_pow : ℕ → R → S := fun n r => r • x^n
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` in the scalar semiring `R` at an element `x` in the target `S` using
scalar multiple `R`-action. -/
irreducible_def smeval : S := p.sum (smul_pow x)
theorem smeval_eq_sum : p.smeval x = p.sum (smul_pow x) := by rw [smeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_C : (C r).smeval x = r • x ^ 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_C_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r).smeval x = r • x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index]
theorem eval_eq_smeval : p.eval r = p.smeval r := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
rfl
theorem eval₂_eq_smeval (R : Type*) [Semiring R] {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) (p : R[X])
(x: S) : letI : Module R S := RingHom.toModule f
p.eval₂ f x = p.smeval x := by
letI : Module R S := RingHom.toModule f
rw [smeval_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum]
rfl
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_zero : (0 : R[X]).smeval x = 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, sum_zero_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_one : (1 : R[X]).smeval x = 1 • x ^ 0 := by
rw [← C_1, smeval_C]
simp only [Nat.cast_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X :
(X : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ 1 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_X_index, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_X_pow {n : ℕ} :
(X ^ n : R[X]).smeval x = x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, X_pow_eq_monomial, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index, one_smul]
end MulActionWithZero
section Module
variable (R : Type*) [Semiring R] (p q : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ] [Module R S]
(x : S)
@[simp]
theorem smeval_add : (p + q).smeval x = p.smeval x + q.smeval x := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow]
refine sum_add_index p q (smul_pow x) (fun _ ↦ ?_) (fun _ _ _ ↦ ?_)
· rw [smul_pow, zero_smul]
· rw [smul_pow, smul_pow, smul_pow, add_smul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Smeval.lean | 111 | 114 | theorem smeval_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : R[X]).smeval x = n • x ^ 0 := by |
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [smeval_zero, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.zero_eq, zero_smul]
· rw [n.cast_succ, smeval_add, ih, smeval_one, ← add_nsmul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.LanguageMap
#align_import model_theory.syntax from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d565b3df44619c1498326936be16f1a935df0728"
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Syntax
This file defines first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories in a style inspired by the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Term` is defined so that `L.Term α` is the type of `L`-terms with free
variables indexed by `α`.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Formula` is defined so that `L.Formula α` is the type of `L`-formulas with
free variables indexed by `α`.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence` is a formula with no free variables.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Theory` is a set of sentences.
* The variables of terms and formulas can be relabelled with `FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel`,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel`, and `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.relabel`.
* Given an operation on terms and an operation on relations,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel` gives an operation on formulas.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE` adds more `Fin`-indexed variables.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt` raises the indexes of the `Fin`-indexed variables
above a particular index.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst` and `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.subst` substitute
variables with given terms.
* Language maps can act on syntactic objects with functions such as
`FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onFormula`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv` and
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv` switch terms and formulas between having
constants in the language and having extra variables indexed by the same type.
## Implementation Notes
* Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable (L : Language.{u, v}) {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder
open Structure Fin
/-- A term on `α` is either a variable indexed by an element of `α`
or a function symbol applied to simpler terms. -/
inductive Term (α : Type u') : Type max u u'
| var : α → Term α
| func : ∀ {l : ℕ} (_f : L.Functions l) (_ts : Fin l → Term α), Term α
#align first_order.language.term FirstOrder.Language.Term
export Term (var func)
variable {L}
namespace Term
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinset [DecidableEq α] : L.Term α → Finset α
| var i => {i}
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinset
#align first_order.language.term.var_finset FirstOrder.Language.Term.varFinset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- The `Finset` of variables from the left side of a sum used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinsetLeft [DecidableEq α] : L.Term (Sum α β) → Finset α
| var (Sum.inl i) => {i}
| var (Sum.inr _i) => ∅
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
#align first_order.language.term.var_finset_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.varFinsetLeft
-- Porting note: universes in different order
@[simp]
def relabel (g : α → β) : L.Term α → L.Term β
| var i => var (g i)
| func f ts => func f fun {i} => (ts i).relabel g
#align first_order.language.term.relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel
theorem relabel_id (t : L.Term α) : t.relabel id = t := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_id FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_id_eq_id : (Term.relabel id : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id :=
funext relabel_id
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_id_eq_id FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_id_eq_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (t : L.Term α) :
(t.relabel f).relabel g = t.relabel (g ∘ f) := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_relabel
@[simp]
theorem relabel_comp_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
(Term.relabel g ∘ Term.relabel f : L.Term α → L.Term γ) = Term.relabel (g ∘ f) :=
funext (relabel_relabel f g)
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_comp_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_comp_relabel
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a bijection. -/
@[simps]
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) : L.Term α ≃ L.Term β :=
⟨relabel g, relabel g.symm, fun t => by simp, fun t => by simp⟩
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabelEquiv
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables. -/
def restrictVar [DecidableEq α] : ∀ (t : L.Term α) (_f : t.varFinset → β), L.Term β
| var a, f => var (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i => (ts i).restrictVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => varFinset (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.restrict_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.restrictVar
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables on the left side of a sum. -/
def restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} :
∀ (t : L.Term (Sum α γ)) (_f : t.varFinsetLeft → β), L.Term (Sum β γ)
| var (Sum.inl a), f => var (Sum.inl (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩))
| var (Sum.inr a), _f => var (Sum.inr a)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i =>
(ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion (subset_biUnion_of_mem
(fun i => varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.restrict_var_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.restrictVarLeft
end Term
/-- The representation of a constant symbol as a term. -/
def Constants.term (c : L.Constants) : L.Term α :=
func c default
#align first_order.language.constants.term FirstOrder.Language.Constants.term
/-- Applies a unary function to a term. -/
def Functions.apply₁ (f : L.Functions 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t]
#align first_order.language.functions.apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Functions.apply₁
/-- Applies a binary function to two terms. -/
def Functions.apply₂ (f : L.Functions 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.functions.apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Functions.apply₂
namespace Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Sends a term with constants to a term with extra variables. -/
@[simp]
def constantsToVars : L[[γ]].Term α → L.Term (Sum γ α)
| var a => var (Sum.inr a)
| @func _ _ 0 f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => var (Sum.inl c)
| @func _ _ (_n + 1) f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => isEmptyElim c
#align first_order.language.term.constants_to_vars FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsToVars
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Sends a term with extra variables to a term with constants. -/
@[simp]
def varsToConstants : L.Term (Sum γ α) → L[[γ]].Term α
| var (Sum.inr a) => var a
| var (Sum.inl c) => Constants.term (Sum.inr c)
| func f ts => func (Sum.inl f) fun i => (ts i).varsToConstants
#align first_order.language.term.vars_to_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.varsToConstants
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
@[simps]
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].Term α ≃ L.Term (Sum γ α) :=
⟨constantsToVars, varsToConstants, by
intro t
induction' t with _ n f _ ih
· rfl
· cases n
· cases f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, Constants.term, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· cases' f with f f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· exact isEmptyElim f, by
intro t
induction' t with x n f _ ih
· cases x <;> rfl
· cases n <;> · simp [varsToConstants, constantsToVars, ih]⟩
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquivLeft : L[[γ]].Term (Sum α β) ≃ L.Term (Sum (Sum γ α) β) :=
constantsVarsEquiv.trans (relabelEquiv (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)).symm
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply (t : L[[γ]].Term (Sum α β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft t = (constantsToVars t).relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _).symm :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left_apply FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply (t : L.Term (Sum (Sum γ α) β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft.symm t = varsToConstants (t.relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left_symm_apply FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply
instance inhabitedOfVar [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨var default⟩
#align first_order.language.term.inhabited_of_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.inhabitedOfVar
instance inhabitedOfConstant [Inhabited L.Constants] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨(default : L.Constants).term⟩
#align first_order.language.term.inhabited_of_constant FirstOrder.Language.Term.inhabitedOfConstant
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a term greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt {n : ℕ} (n' m : ℕ) : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L.Term (Sum α (Fin (n + n'))) :=
relabel (Sum.map id fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n')
#align first_order.language.term.lift_at FirstOrder.Language.Term.liftAt
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given term with terms. -/
@[simp]
def subst : L.Term α → (α → L.Term β) → L.Term β
| var a, tf => tf a
| func f ts, tf => func f fun i => (ts i).subst tf
#align first_order.language.term.subst FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst
end Term
scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:arg "&" => FirstOrder.Language.Term.var ∘ Sum.inr
namespace LHom
open Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language map. -/
@[simp]
def onTerm (φ : L →ᴸ L') : L.Term α → L'.Term α
| var i => var i
| func f ts => func (φ.onFunction f) fun i => onTerm φ (ts i)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onTerm
@[simp]
theorem id_onTerm : ((LHom.id L).onTerm : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id := by
ext t
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [onTerm, ih]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.id_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.id_onTerm
@[simp]
theorem comp_onTerm {L'' : Language} (φ : L' →ᴸ L'') (ψ : L →ᴸ L') :
((φ.comp ψ).onTerm : L.Term α → L''.Term α) = φ.onTerm ∘ ψ.onTerm := by
ext t
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [onTerm, ih]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.comp_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp_onTerm
end LHom
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def Lequiv.onTerm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Term α ≃ L'.Term α where
toFun := φ.toLHom.onTerm
invFun := φ.invLHom.onTerm
left_inv := by
rw [Function.leftInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.left_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
right_inv := by
rw [Function.rightInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.right_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lequiv.on_term FirstOrder.Language.Lequiv.onTerm
variable (L) (α)
/-- `BoundedFormula α n` is the type of formulas with free variables indexed by `α` and up to `n`
additional free variables. -/
inductive BoundedFormula : ℕ → Type max u v u'
| falsum {n} : BoundedFormula n
| equal {n} (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| rel {n l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations l) (ts : Fin l → L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| imp {n} (f₁ f₂ : BoundedFormula n) : BoundedFormula n
| all {n} (f : BoundedFormula (n + 1)) : BoundedFormula n
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula
/-- `Formula α` is the type of formulas with all free variables indexed by `α`. -/
abbrev Formula :=
L.BoundedFormula α 0
#align first_order.language.formula FirstOrder.Language.Formula
/-- A sentence is a formula with no free variables. -/
abbrev Sentence :=
L.Formula Empty
#align first_order.language.sentence FirstOrder.Language.Sentence
/-- A theory is a set of sentences. -/
abbrev Theory :=
Set L.Sentence
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory FirstOrder.Language.Theory
variable {L} {α} {n : ℕ}
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula {l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term (Sum α (Fin l))) :
L.BoundedFormula α l :=
BoundedFormula.rel R ts
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t]
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula₁ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula₁
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula₂ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula₂
/-- The equality of two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Term.bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
BoundedFormula.equal t₁ t₂
#align first_order.language.term.bd_equal FirstOrder.Language.Term.bdEqual
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.formula (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
R.boundedFormula fun i => (ts i).relabel Sum.inl
#align first_order.language.relations.formula FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t]
#align first_order.language.relations.formula₁ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula₁
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.relations.formula₂ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula₂
/-- The equality of two terms as a first-order formula. -/
def Term.equal (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
(t₁.relabel Sum.inl).bdEqual (t₂.relabel Sum.inl)
#align first_order.language.term.equal FirstOrder.Language.Term.equal
namespace BoundedFormula
instance : Inhabited (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
instance : Bot (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
/-- The negation of a bounded formula is also a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def not (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.imp ⊥
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.not FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.not
/-- Puts an `∃` quantifier on a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.not.all.not
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.ex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.ex
instance : Top (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨BoundedFormula.not ⊥⟩
instance : Inf (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.imp g.not).not⟩
instance : Sup (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => f.not.imp g⟩
/-- The biimplication between two bounded formulas. -/
protected def iff (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
φ.imp ψ ⊓ ψ.imp φ
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.iff FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.iff
open Finset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given formula. -/
@[simp]
def freeVarFinset [DecidableEq α] : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → Finset α
| _n, falsum => ∅
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.varFinsetLeft ∪ t₂.varFinsetLeft
| _n, rel _R ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
| _n, imp f₁ f₂ => f₁.freeVarFinset ∪ f₂.freeVarFinset
| _n, all f => f.freeVarFinset
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.free_var_finset FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.freeVarFinset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Casts `L.BoundedFormula α m` as `L.BoundedFormula α n`, where `m ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
def castLE : ∀ {m n : ℕ} (_h : m ≤ n), L.BoundedFormula α m → L.BoundedFormula α n
| _m, _n, _h, falsum => falsum
| _m, _n, h, equal t₁ t₂ =>
equal (t₁.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h))) (t₂.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)))
| _m, _n, h, rel R ts => rel R (Term.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)) ∘ ts)
| _m, _n, h, imp f₁ f₂ => (f₁.castLE h).imp (f₂.castLE h)
| _m, _n, h, all f => (f.castLE (add_le_add_right h 1)).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE
@[simp]
theorem castLE_rfl {n} (h : n ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : φ.castLE h = φ := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih1, ih2]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_rfl FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_rfl
@[simp]
theorem castLE_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.castLE km).castLE mn = φ.castLE (km.trans mn) := by
revert m n
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3 <;> intro m n km mn
· rfl
· simp
· simp only [castLE, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, true_and_iff]
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, Term.relabel_comp_relabel]
simp
· simp [ih1, ih2]
· simp only [castLE, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_castLE
@[simp]
theorem castLE_comp_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) :
(BoundedFormula.castLE mn ∘ BoundedFormula.castLE km :
L.BoundedFormula α k → L.BoundedFormula α n) =
BoundedFormula.castLE (km.trans mn) :=
funext (castLE_castLE km mn)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_comp_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_comp_castLE
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a bounded formula to only use a particular set of free variables. -/
def restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] :
∀ {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (_f : φ.freeVarFinset → β), L.BoundedFormula β n
| _n, falsum, _f => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂, f =>
equal (t₁.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left))
(t₂.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, rel R ts, f =>
rel R fun i => (ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => Term.varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂, f =>
(φ₁.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left)).imp
(φ₂.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, all φ, f => (φ.restrictFreeVar f).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.restrict_free_var FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.restrictFreeVar
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Places universal quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def alls : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.all.alls
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.alls FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.alls
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Places existential quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def exs : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.ex.exs
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.exs FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.exs
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Maps bounded formulas along a map of terms and a map of relations. -/
def mapTermRel {g : ℕ → ℕ} (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin (g n))))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(h : ∀ n, L'.BoundedFormula β (g (n + 1)) → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n + 1)) :
∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n)
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => equal (ft _ t₁) (ft _ t₂)
| _n, rel R ts => rel (fr _ R) fun i => ft _ (ts i)
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => (φ₁.mapTermRel ft fr h).imp (φ₂.mapTermRel ft fr h)
| n, all φ => (h n (φ.mapTermRel ft fr h)).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a formula greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt : ∀ {n : ℕ} (n' _m : ℕ), L.BoundedFormula α n → L.BoundedFormula α (n + n') :=
fun {n} n' m φ =>
φ.mapTermRel (fun k t => t.liftAt n' m) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc])
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.lift_at FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_mapTermRel {L'' : Language}
(ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(ft' : ∀ n, L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)) → L''.Term (Sum γ (Fin n)))
(fr' : ∀ n, L'.Relations n → L''.Relations n) {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
((φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).mapTermRel ft' fr' fun _ => id) =
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => ft' _ ∘ ft _) (fun _ => fr' _ ∘ fr _) fun _ => id := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_map_term_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel_mapTermRel
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_id_id_id {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => id) (fun _ => id) fun _ => id) = φ := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_id_id_id FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel_id_id_id
/-- An equivalence of bounded formulas given by an equivalence of terms and an equivalence of
relations. -/
@[simps]
def mapTermRelEquiv (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) ≃ L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n ≃ L'.Relations n) {n} : L.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L'.BoundedFormula β n :=
⟨mapTermRel (fun n => ft n) (fun n => fr n) fun _ => id,
mapTermRel (fun n => (ft n).symm) (fun n => (fr n).symm) fun _ => id, fun φ => by simp, fun φ =>
by simp⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv
/-- A function to help relabel the variables in bounded formulas. -/
def relabelAux (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) (k : ℕ) : Sum α (Fin k) → Sum β (Fin (n + k)) :=
Sum.map id finSumFinEquiv ∘ Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _ ∘ Sum.map g id
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_aux FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabelAux
@[simp]
theorem sum_elim_comp_relabelAux {m : ℕ} {g : α → Sum β (Fin n)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (n + m) → M} : Sum.elim v xs ∘ relabelAux g m =
Sum.elim (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ castAdd m) ∘ g) (xs ∘ natAdd n) := by
ext x
cases' x with x x
· simp only [BoundedFormula.relabelAux, Function.comp_apply, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
cases' g x with l r <;> simp
· simp [BoundedFormula.relabelAux]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.sum_elim_comp_relabel_aux FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.sum_elim_comp_relabelAux
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Syntax.lean | 577 | 580 | theorem relabelAux_sum_inl (k : ℕ) :
relabelAux (Sum.inl : α → Sum α (Fin n)) k = Sum.map id (natAdd n) := by |
ext x
cases x <;> · simp [relabelAux]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order
#align_import topology.maps from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d91e7f7a7f1c7e9f0e18fdb6bde4f652004c735d"
/-!
# Specific classes of maps between topological spaces
This file introduces the following properties of a map `f : X → Y` between topological spaces:
* `IsOpenMap f` means the image of an open set under `f` is open.
* `IsClosedMap f` means the image of a closed set under `f` is closed.
(Open and closed maps need not be continuous.)
* `Inducing f` means the topology on `X` is the one induced via `f` from the topology on `Y`.
These behave like embeddings except they need not be injective. Instead, points of `X` which
are identified by `f` are also inseparable in the topology on `X`.
* `Embedding f` means `f` is inducing and also injective. Equivalently, `f` identifies `X` with
a subspace of `Y`.
* `OpenEmbedding f` means `f` is an embedding with open image, so it identifies `X` with an
open subspace of `Y`. Equivalently, `f` is an embedding and an open map.
* `ClosedEmbedding f` similarly means `f` is an embedding with closed image, so it identifies
`X` with a closed subspace of `Y`. Equivalently, `f` is an embedding and a closed map.
* `QuotientMap f` is the dual condition to `Embedding f`: `f` is surjective and the topology
on `Y` is the one coinduced via `f` from the topology on `X`. Equivalently, `f` identifies
`Y` with a quotient of `X`. Quotient maps are also sometimes known as identification maps.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_and_closed_maps>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedding#General_topology>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quotient_space_(topology)#Quotient_map>
## Tags
open map, closed map, embedding, quotient map, identification map
-/
open Set Filter Function
open TopologicalSpace Topology Filter
variable {X : Type*} {Y : Type*} {Z : Type*} {ι : Type*} {f : X → Y} {g : Y → Z}
section Inducing
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
theorem inducing_induced (f : X → Y) : @Inducing X Y (TopologicalSpace.induced f ‹_›) _ f :=
@Inducing.mk _ _ (TopologicalSpace.induced f ‹_›) _ _ rfl
theorem inducing_id : Inducing (@id X) :=
⟨induced_id.symm⟩
#align inducing_id inducing_id
protected theorem Inducing.comp (hg : Inducing g) (hf : Inducing f) :
Inducing (g ∘ f) :=
⟨by rw [hf.induced, hg.induced, induced_compose]⟩
#align inducing.comp Inducing.comp
theorem Inducing.of_comp_iff (hg : Inducing g) :
Inducing (g ∘ f) ↔ Inducing f := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hg.comp⟩
rw [inducing_iff, hg.induced, induced_compose, h.induced]
#align inducing.inducing_iff Inducing.of_comp_iff
theorem inducing_of_inducing_compose
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) (hgf : Inducing (g ∘ f)) : Inducing f :=
⟨le_antisymm (by rwa [← continuous_iff_le_induced])
(by
rw [hgf.induced, ← induced_compose]
exact induced_mono hg.le_induced)⟩
#align inducing_of_inducing_compose inducing_of_inducing_compose
theorem inducing_iff_nhds : Inducing f ↔ ∀ x, 𝓝 x = comap f (𝓝 (f x)) :=
(inducing_iff _).trans (induced_iff_nhds_eq f)
#align inducing_iff_nhds inducing_iff_nhds
namespace Inducing
theorem nhds_eq_comap (hf : Inducing f) : ∀ x : X, 𝓝 x = comap f (𝓝 <| f x) :=
inducing_iff_nhds.1 hf
#align inducing.nhds_eq_comap Inducing.nhds_eq_comap
theorem basis_nhds {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set Y} (hf : Inducing f) {x : X}
(h_basis : (𝓝 (f x)).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p (preimage f ∘ s) :=
hf.nhds_eq_comap x ▸ h_basis.comap f
theorem nhdsSet_eq_comap (hf : Inducing f) (s : Set X) :
𝓝ˢ s = comap f (𝓝ˢ (f '' s)) := by
simp only [nhdsSet, sSup_image, comap_iSup, hf.nhds_eq_comap, iSup_image]
#align inducing.nhds_set_eq_comap Inducing.nhdsSet_eq_comap
theorem map_nhds_eq (hf : Inducing f) (x : X) : (𝓝 x).map f = 𝓝[range f] f x :=
hf.induced.symm ▸ map_nhds_induced_eq x
#align inducing.map_nhds_eq Inducing.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhds_of_mem (hf : Inducing f) (x : X) (h : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) :
(𝓝 x).map f = 𝓝 (f x) :=
hf.induced.symm ▸ map_nhds_induced_of_mem h
#align inducing.map_nhds_of_mem Inducing.map_nhds_of_mem
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem mapClusterPt_iff (hf : Inducing f) {x : X} {l : Filter X} :
MapClusterPt (f x) l f ↔ ClusterPt x l := by
delta MapClusterPt ClusterPt
rw [← Filter.push_pull', ← hf.nhds_eq_comap, map_neBot_iff]
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin (hf : Inducing f) {x : X} {s : Set X} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
f '' s ∈ 𝓝[range f] f x :=
hf.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align inducing.image_mem_nhds_within Inducing.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff {f : ι → Y} {l : Filter ι} {y : Y} (hg : Inducing g) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) ↔ Tendsto (g ∘ f) l (𝓝 (g y)) := by
rw [hg.nhds_eq_comap, tendsto_comap_iff]
#align inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff Inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff (hg : Inducing g) {x : X} :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.tendsto_nhds_iff
#align inducing.continuous_at_iff Inducing.continuousAt_iff
theorem continuous_iff (hg : Inducing g) :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous (g ∘ f) := by
simp_rw [continuous_iff_continuousAt, hg.continuousAt_iff]
#align inducing.continuous_iff Inducing.continuous_iff
theorem continuousAt_iff' (hf : Inducing f) {x : X} (h : range f ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) :
ContinuousAt (g ∘ f) x ↔ ContinuousAt g (f x) := by
simp_rw [ContinuousAt, Filter.Tendsto, ← hf.map_nhds_of_mem _ h, Filter.map_map, comp]
#align inducing.continuous_at_iff' Inducing.continuousAt_iff'
protected theorem continuous (hf : Inducing f) : Continuous f :=
hf.continuous_iff.mp continuous_id
#align inducing.continuous Inducing.continuous
| Mathlib/Topology/Maps.lean | 146 | 149 | theorem closure_eq_preimage_closure_image (hf : Inducing f) (s : Set X) :
closure s = f ⁻¹' closure (f '' s) := by |
ext x
rw [Set.mem_preimage, ← closure_induced, hf.induced]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Kevin Buzzard, Yaël Dillies, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Sigma
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLatticeIntervals
#align_import order.sup_indep from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4c2ed622f43768eff32608d4a0f8a6cec1c047d"
/-!
# Supremum independence
In this file, we define supremum independence of indexed sets. An indexed family `f : ι → α` is
sup-independent if, for all `a`, `f a` and the supremum of the rest are disjoint.
## Main definitions
* `Finset.SupIndep s f`: a family of elements `f` are supremum independent on the finite set `s`.
* `CompleteLattice.SetIndependent s`: a set of elements are supremum independent.
* `CompleteLattice.Independent f`: a family of elements are supremum independent.
## Main statements
* In a distributive lattice, supremum independence is equivalent to pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.setIndependent_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.independent_iff_pairwiseDisjoint`
* Otherwise, supremum independence is stronger than pairwise disjointness:
* `Finset.SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.SetIndependent.pairwiseDisjoint`
* `CompleteLattice.Independent.pairwiseDisjoint`
## Implementation notes
For the finite version, we avoid the "obvious" definition
`∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f)` because `erase` would require decidable equality on
`ι`.
-/
variable {α β ι ι' : Type*}
/-! ### On lattices with a bottom element, via `Finset.sup` -/
namespace Finset
section Lattice
variable [Lattice α] [OrderBot α]
/-- Supremum independence of finite sets. We avoid the "obvious" definition using `s.erase i`
because `erase` would require decidable equality on `ι`. -/
def SupIndep (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃t⦄, t ⊆ s → ∀ ⦃i⦄, i ∈ s → i ∉ t → Disjoint (f i) (t.sup f)
#align finset.sup_indep Finset.SupIndep
variable {s t : Finset ι} {f : ι → α} {i : ι}
instance [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq α] : Decidable (SupIndep s f) := by
refine @Finset.decidableForallOfDecidableSubsets _ _ _ (?_)
rintro t -
refine @Finset.decidableDforallFinset _ _ _ (?_)
rintro i -
have : Decidable (Disjoint (f i) (sup t f)) := decidable_of_iff' (_ = ⊥) disjoint_iff
infer_instance
theorem SupIndep.subset (ht : t.SupIndep f) (h : s ⊆ t) : s.SupIndep f := fun _ hu _ hi =>
ht (hu.trans h) (h hi)
#align finset.sup_indep.subset Finset.SupIndep.subset
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_empty (f : ι → α) : (∅ : Finset ι).SupIndep f := fun _ _ a ha =>
(not_mem_empty a ha).elim
#align finset.sup_indep_empty Finset.supIndep_empty
theorem supIndep_singleton (i : ι) (f : ι → α) : ({i} : Finset ι).SupIndep f :=
fun s hs j hji hj => by
rw [eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton ⟨hs, fun h => hj (h hji)⟩, sup_empty]
exact disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.sup_indep_singleton Finset.supIndep_singleton
theorem SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint (hs : s.SupIndep f) : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
sup_singleton.subst <| hs (singleton_subset_iff.2 hb) ha <| not_mem_singleton.2 hab
#align finset.sup_indep.pairwise_disjoint Finset.SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint
theorem SupIndep.le_sup_iff (hs : s.SupIndep f) (hts : t ⊆ s) (hi : i ∈ s) (hf : ∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥) :
f i ≤ t.sup f ↔ i ∈ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, le_sup⟩
by_contra hit
exact hf i (disjoint_self.1 <| (hs hts hi hit).mono_right h)
#align finset.sup_indep.le_sup_iff Finset.SupIndep.le_sup_iff
/-- The RHS looks like the definition of `CompleteLattice.Independent`. -/
theorem supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] :
s.SupIndep f ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, Disjoint (f i) ((s.erase i).sup f) :=
⟨fun hs _ hi => hs (erase_subset _ _) hi (not_mem_erase _ _), fun hs _ ht i hi hit =>
(hs i hi).mono_right (sup_mono fun _ hj => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit, ht hj⟩)⟩
#align finset.sup_indep_iff_disjoint_erase Finset.supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase
theorem SupIndep.image [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → ι} (hs : s.SupIndep (f ∘ g)) :
(s.image g).SupIndep f := by
intro t ht i hi hit
rw [mem_image] at hi
obtain ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩ := hi
haveI : DecidableEq ι' := Classical.decEq _
suffices hts : t ⊆ (s.erase i).image g by
refine (supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase.1 hs i hi).mono_right ((sup_mono hts).trans ?_)
rw [sup_image]
rintro j hjt
obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 (ht hjt)
exact mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_apply_ne g (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hjt hit), hj⟩)
#align finset.sup_indep.image Finset.SupIndep.image
theorem supIndep_map {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' ↪ ι} : (s.map g).SupIndep f ↔ s.SupIndep (f ∘ g) := by
refine ⟨fun hs t ht i hi hit => ?_, fun hs => ?_⟩
· rw [← sup_map]
exact hs (map_subset_map.2 ht) ((mem_map' _).2 hi) (by rwa [mem_map'])
· classical
rw [map_eq_image]
exact hs.image
#align finset.sup_indep_map Finset.supIndep_map
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_pair [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
({i, j} : Finset ι).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f i) (f j) :=
⟨fun h => h.pairwiseDisjoint (by simp) (by simp) hij,
fun h => by
rw [supIndep_iff_disjoint_erase]
intro k hk
rw [Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_singleton] at hk
obtain rfl | rfl := hk
· convert h using 1
rw [Finset.erase_insert, Finset.sup_singleton]
simpa using hij
· convert h.symm using 1
have : ({i, k} : Finset ι).erase k = {i} := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_insert, mem_singleton, mem_singleton, and_or_left, Ne,
not_and_self_iff, or_false_iff, and_iff_right_of_imp]
rintro rfl
exact hij
rw [this, Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
#align finset.sup_indep_pair Finset.supIndep_pair
theorem supIndep_univ_bool (f : Bool → α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset Bool).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f false) (f true) :=
haveI : true ≠ false := by simp only [Ne, not_false_iff]
(supIndep_pair this).trans disjoint_comm
#align finset.sup_indep_univ_bool Finset.supIndep_univ_bool
@[simp]
theorem supIndep_univ_fin_two (f : Fin 2 → α) :
(Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 2)).SupIndep f ↔ Disjoint (f 0) (f 1) :=
haveI : (0 : Fin 2) ≠ 1 := by simp
supIndep_pair this
#align finset.sup_indep_univ_fin_two Finset.supIndep_univ_fin_two
theorem SupIndep.attach (hs : s.SupIndep f) : s.attach.SupIndep fun a => f a := by
intro t _ i _ hi
classical
have : (fun (a : { x // x ∈ s }) => f ↑a) = f ∘ (fun a : { x // x ∈ s } => ↑a) := rfl
rw [this, ← Finset.sup_image]
refine hs (image_subset_iff.2 fun (j : { x // x ∈ s }) _ => j.2) i.2 fun hi' => hi ?_
rw [mem_image] at hi'
obtain ⟨j, hj, hji⟩ := hi'
rwa [Subtype.ext hji] at hj
#align finset.sup_indep.attach Finset.SupIndep.attach
/-
Porting note: simpNF linter returns
"Left-hand side does not simplify, when using the simp lemma on itself."
However, simp does indeed solve the following. leanprover/std4#71 is related.
example {α ι} [Lattice α] [OrderBot α] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α) :
(s.attach.SupIndep fun a => f a) ↔ s.SupIndep f := by simp
-/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem supIndep_attach : (s.attach.SupIndep fun a => f a) ↔ s.SupIndep f := by
refine ⟨fun h t ht i his hit => ?_, SupIndep.attach⟩
classical
convert h (filter_subset (fun (i : { x // x ∈ s }) => (i : ι) ∈ t) _) (mem_attach _ ⟨i, ‹_›⟩)
fun hi => hit <| by simpa using hi using 1
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff ?_
simp only [Finset.sup_le_iff, mem_filter, mem_attach, true_and_iff, Function.comp_apply,
Subtype.forall, Subtype.coe_mk]
exact fun a => forall_congr' fun j => ⟨fun h _ => h, fun h hj => h (ht hj) hj⟩
#align finset.sup_indep_attach Finset.supIndep_attach
end Lattice
section DistribLattice
variable [DistribLattice α] [OrderBot α] {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
theorem supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint : s.SupIndep f ↔ (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint f :=
⟨SupIndep.pairwiseDisjoint, fun hs _ ht _ hi hit =>
Finset.disjoint_sup_right.2 fun _ hj => hs hi (ht hj) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hj hit).symm⟩
#align finset.sup_indep_iff_pairwise_disjoint Finset.supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint
alias ⟨sup_indep.pairwise_disjoint, _root_.Set.PairwiseDisjoint.supIndep⟩ :=
supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint
#align set.pairwise_disjoint.sup_indep Set.PairwiseDisjoint.supIndep
/-- Bind operation for `SupIndep`. -/
theorem SupIndep.sup [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : s.SupIndep fun i => (g i).sup f) (hg : ∀ i' ∈ s, (g i').SupIndep f) :
(s.sup g).SupIndep f := by
simp_rw [supIndep_iff_pairwiseDisjoint] at hs hg ⊢
rw [sup_eq_biUnion, coe_biUnion]
exact hs.biUnion_finset hg
#align finset.sup_indep.sup Finset.SupIndep.sup
/-- Bind operation for `SupIndep`. -/
| Mathlib/Order/SupIndep.lean | 222 | 226 | theorem SupIndep.biUnion [DecidableEq ι] {s : Finset ι'} {g : ι' → Finset ι} {f : ι → α}
(hs : s.SupIndep fun i => (g i).sup f) (hg : ∀ i' ∈ s, (g i').SupIndep f) :
(s.biUnion g).SupIndep f := by |
rw [← sup_eq_biUnion]
exact hs.sup hg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.List.Rotate
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
#align_import group_theory.perm.list from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Permutations from a list
A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
When there are duplicate elements in `l`, how and in what arrangement with respect to the other
elements they appear in the list determines the formed permutation.
This is because `List.formPerm` is implemented as a product of `Equiv.swap`s.
That means that presence of a sublist of two adjacent duplicates like `[..., x, x, ...]`
will produce the same permutation as if the adjacent duplicates were not present.
The `List.formPerm` definition is meant to primarily be used with `Nodup l`, so that
the resulting permutation is cyclic (if `l` has at least two elements).
The presence of duplicates in a particular placement can lead `List.formPerm` to produce a
nontrivial permutation that is noncyclic.
-/
namespace List
variable {α β : Type*}
section FormPerm
variable [DecidableEq α] (l : List α)
open Equiv Equiv.Perm
/-- A list `l : List α` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α` where each element in the list
is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`. When we have that `Nodup l`,
we prove that `Equiv.Perm.support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset`, and that
`formPerm l` is rotationally invariant, in `formPerm_rotate`.
-/
def formPerm : Equiv.Perm α :=
(zipWith Equiv.swap l l.tail).prod
#align list.form_perm List.formPerm
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_nil : formPerm ([] : List α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_nil List.formPerm_nil
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_singleton (x : α) : formPerm [x] = 1 :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_singleton List.formPerm_singleton
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_cons (x y : α) (l : List α) :
formPerm (x :: y :: l) = swap x y * formPerm (y :: l) :=
prod_cons
#align list.form_perm_cons_cons List.formPerm_cons_cons
theorem formPerm_pair (x y : α) : formPerm [x, y] = swap x y :=
rfl
#align list.form_perm_pair List.formPerm_pair
theorem mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne : ∀ {l l' : List α} {x : α},
(zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x → x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ l'
| [], _, _ => by simp
| _, [], _ => by simp
| a::l, b::l', x => fun hx ↦
if h : (zipWith swap l l').prod x = x then
(eq_or_eq_of_swap_apply_ne_self (by simpa [h] using hx)).imp
(by rintro rfl; exact .head _) (by rintro rfl; exact .head _)
else
(mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h).imp (.tail _) (.tail _)
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support' (l l' : List α) :
{ x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := fun _ h ↦ by
simpa using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
#align list.zip_with_swap_prod_support' List.zipWith_swap_prod_support'
theorem zipWith_swap_prod_support [Fintype α] (l l' : List α) :
(zipWith swap l l').prod.support ≤ l.toFinset ⊔ l'.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | (zipWith swap l l').prod x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using zipWith_swap_prod_support' _ _ hx'
#align list.zip_with_swap_prod_support List.zipWith_swap_prod_support
theorem support_formPerm_le' : { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } ≤ l.toFinset := by
refine (zipWith_swap_prod_support' l l.tail).trans ?_
simpa [Finset.subset_iff] using tail_subset l
#align list.support_form_perm_le' List.support_formPerm_le'
theorem support_formPerm_le [Fintype α] : support (formPerm l) ≤ l.toFinset := by
intro x hx
have hx' : x ∈ { x | formPerm l x ≠ x } := by simpa using hx
simpa using support_formPerm_le' _ hx'
#align list.support_form_perm_le List.support_formPerm_le
variable {l} {x : α}
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne (h : l.formPerm x ≠ x) : x ∈ l := by
simpa [or_iff_left_of_imp mem_of_mem_tail] using mem_or_mem_of_zipWith_swap_prod_ne h
#align list.mem_of_form_perm_apply_ne List.mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne
theorem formPerm_apply_of_not_mem (h : x ∉ l) : formPerm l x = x :=
not_imp_comm.1 mem_of_formPerm_apply_ne h
#align list.form_perm_apply_of_not_mem List.formPerm_apply_of_not_mem
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem (h : x ∈ l) : formPerm l x ∈ l := by
cases' l with y l
· simp at h
induction' l with z l IH generalizing x y
· simpa using h
· by_cases hx : x ∈ z :: l
· rw [formPerm_cons_cons, mul_apply, swap_apply_def]
split_ifs
· simp [IH _ hx]
· simp
· simp [*]
· replace h : x = y := Or.resolve_right (mem_cons.1 h) hx
simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, ← h]
#align list.form_perm_apply_mem_of_mem List.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem
theorem mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem (h : l.formPerm x ∈ l) : x ∈ l := by
contrapose h
rwa [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h]
#align list.mem_of_form_perm_apply_mem List.mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_mem_iff_mem : l.formPerm x ∈ l ↔ x ∈ l :=
⟨l.mem_of_formPerm_apply_mem, l.formPerm_apply_mem_of_mem⟩
#align list.form_perm_mem_iff_mem List.formPerm_mem_iff_mem
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_cons_concat_apply_last (x y : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: (xs ++ [y])) y = x := by
induction' xs with z xs IH generalizing x y
· simp
· simp [IH]
#align list.form_perm_cons_concat_apply_last List.formPerm_cons_concat_apply_last
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_getLast (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).getLast (cons_ne_nil x xs)) = x := by
induction' xs using List.reverseRecOn with xs y _ generalizing x <;> simp
#align list.form_perm_apply_last List.formPerm_apply_getLast
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_apply_get_length (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).get (Fin.mk xs.length (by simp))) = x := by
rw [get_cons_length, formPerm_apply_getLast]; rfl;
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[simp, deprecated formPerm_apply_get_length (since := "2024-05-30")]
theorem formPerm_apply_nthLe_length (x : α) (xs : List α) :
formPerm (x :: xs) ((x :: xs).nthLe xs.length (by simp)) = x := by
apply formPerm_apply_get_length
#align list.form_perm_apply_nth_le_length List.formPerm_apply_nthLe_length
theorem formPerm_apply_head (x y : α) (xs : List α) (h : Nodup (x :: y :: xs)) :
formPerm (x :: y :: xs) x = y := by simp [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem h.not_mem]
#align list.form_perm_apply_head List.formPerm_apply_head
theorem formPerm_apply_get_zero (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
formPerm l (l.get (Fin.mk 0 (by omega))) = l.get (Fin.mk 1 hl) := by
rcases l with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hl
· rw [get, get_singleton]; rfl;
· rw [get, formPerm_apply_head, get, get]
exact h
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated formPerm_apply_get_zero (since := "2024-05-30")]
theorem formPerm_apply_nthLe_zero (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (hl : 1 < l.length) :
formPerm l (l.nthLe 0 (by omega)) = l.nthLe 1 hl := by
apply formPerm_apply_get_zero _ h
#align list.form_perm_apply_nth_le_zero List.formPerm_apply_nthLe_zero
variable (l)
theorem formPerm_eq_head_iff_eq_getLast (x y : α) :
formPerm (y :: l) x = y ↔ x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
Iff.trans (by rw [formPerm_apply_getLast]) (formPerm (y :: l)).injective.eq_iff
#align list.form_perm_eq_head_iff_eq_last List.formPerm_eq_head_iff_eq_getLast
theorem formPerm_apply_lt_get (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
formPerm xs (xs.get (Fin.mk n ((Nat.lt_succ_self n).trans hn))) =
xs.get (Fin.mk (n + 1) hn) := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing xs
· simpa using formPerm_apply_get_zero _ h _
· rcases xs with (_ | ⟨x, _ | ⟨y, l⟩⟩)
· simp at hn
· rw [formPerm_singleton, get_singleton, get_singleton]
rfl;
· specialize IH (y :: l) h.of_cons _
· simpa [Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] using hn
simp only [swap_apply_eq_iff, coe_mul, formPerm_cons_cons, Function.comp]
simp only [get_cons_succ] at *
rw [← IH, swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne] <;>
· intro hx
rw [← hx, IH] at h
simp [get_mem] at h
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated formPerm_apply_lt_get (since := "2024-05-30")]
theorem formPerm_apply_lt (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n + 1 < xs.length) :
formPerm xs (xs.nthLe n ((Nat.lt_succ_self n).trans hn)) = xs.nthLe (n + 1) hn := by
apply formPerm_apply_lt_get _ h
#align list.form_perm_apply_lt List.formPerm_apply_lt
theorem formPerm_apply_get (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (i : Fin xs.length) :
formPerm xs (xs.get i) =
xs.get ⟨((i.val + 1) % xs.length), (Nat.mod_lt _ (i.val.zero_le.trans_lt i.isLt))⟩ := by
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := i
cases' xs with x xs
· simp at hn
· have : n ≤ xs.length := by
refine Nat.le_of_lt_succ ?_
simpa using hn
rcases this.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hn')
· simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_lt_get (x :: xs) h _ (Nat.succ_lt_succ hn')]
congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; simpa [Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated formPerm_apply_get (since := "2024-04-23")]
theorem formPerm_apply_nthLe (xs : List α) (h : Nodup xs) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < xs.length) :
formPerm xs (xs.nthLe n hn) =
xs.nthLe ((n + 1) % xs.length) (Nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) := by
apply formPerm_apply_get _ h
#align list.form_perm_apply_nth_le List.formPerm_apply_nthLe
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup' (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
{ x | formPerm l x ≠ x } = l.toFinset := by
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· exact support_formPerm_le' l
· intro x hx
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, mem_toFinset] at hx
obtain ⟨⟨n, hn⟩, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, formPerm_apply_get _ h]
intro H
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get, Function.Injective] at h
specialize h H
rcases (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn).eq_or_lt with hn' | hn'
· simp only [← hn', Nat.mod_self] at h
refine' not_exists.mpr h' _
rw [← length_eq_one, ← hn', (Fin.mk.inj_iff.mp h).symm]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn'] at h
#align list.support_form_perm_of_nodup' List.support_formPerm_of_nodup'
theorem support_formPerm_of_nodup [Fintype α] (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (h' : ∀ x : α, l ≠ [x]) :
support (formPerm l) = l.toFinset := by
rw [← Finset.coe_inj]
convert support_formPerm_of_nodup' _ h h'
simp [Set.ext_iff]
#align list.support_form_perm_of_nodup List.support_formPerm_of_nodup
theorem formPerm_rotate_one (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) : formPerm (l.rotate 1) = formPerm l := by
have h' : Nodup (l.rotate 1) := by simpa using h
ext x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l.rotate 1
· obtain ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem hx
rw [formPerm_apply_get _ h', get_rotate l, get_rotate l, formPerm_apply_get _ h]
simp
· rw [formPerm_apply_of_not_mem hx, formPerm_apply_of_not_mem]
simpa using hx
#align list.form_perm_rotate_one List.formPerm_rotate_one
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/List.lean | 277 | 283 | theorem formPerm_rotate (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) :
formPerm (l.rotate n) = formPerm l := by |
induction' n with n hn
· simp
· rw [← rotate_rotate, formPerm_rotate_one, hn]
rwa [IsRotated.nodup_iff]
exact IsRotated.forall l n
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Control.ForInStep.Lemmas
import Batteries.Data.List.Basic
import Batteries.Tactic.Init
import Batteries.Tactic.Alias
namespace List
open Nat
/-! ### mem -/
@[simp] theorem mem_toArray {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ l.toArray ↔ a ∈ l := by
simp [Array.mem_def]
/-! ### drop -/
@[simp]
theorem drop_one : ∀ l : List α, drop 1 l = tail l
| [] | _ :: _ => rfl
/-! ### zipWith -/
theorem zipWith_distrib_tail : (zipWith f l l').tail = zipWith f l.tail l'.tail := by
rw [← drop_one]; simp [zipWith_distrib_drop]
/-! ### List subset -/
theorem subset_def {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ ↔ ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∈ l₂ := .rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_subset (l : List α) : [] ⊆ l := nofun
@[simp] theorem Subset.refl (l : List α) : l ⊆ l := fun _ i => i
theorem Subset.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ⊆ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ ⊆ l₃) : l₁ ⊆ l₃ :=
fun _ i => h₂ (h₁ i)
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Subset Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂ h₁⟩
instance : Trans (Subset : List α → List α → Prop) Subset Subset :=
⟨Subset.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l ⊆ a :: l := fun _ => Mem.tail _
theorem subset_of_cons_subset {a : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} : a :: l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
fun s _ i => s (mem_cons_of_mem _ i)
theorem subset_cons_of_subset (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} : l₁ ⊆ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun s _ i => .tail _ (s i)
theorem cons_subset_cons {l₁ l₂ : List α} (a : α) (s : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : a :: l₁ ⊆ a :: l₂ :=
fun _ => by simp only [mem_cons]; exact Or.imp_right (@s _)
@[simp] theorem subset_append_left (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_left _
@[simp] theorem subset_append_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ := fun _ => mem_append_right _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_left (l₂ : List α) : l ⊆ l₁ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_left _ _
theorem subset_append_of_subset_right (l₁ : List α) : l ⊆ l₂ → l ⊆ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
fun s => Subset.trans s <| subset_append_right _ _
@[simp] theorem cons_subset : a :: l ⊆ m ↔ a ∈ m ∧ l ⊆ m := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
@[simp] theorem append_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l ↔ l₁ ⊆ l ∧ l₂ ⊆ l := by simp [subset_def, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem subset_nil {l : List α} : l ⊆ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun h => match l with | [] => rfl | _::_ => (nomatch h (.head ..)), fun | rfl => Subset.refl _⟩
theorem map_subset {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (H : l₁ ⊆ l₂) : map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ :=
fun x => by simp only [mem_map]; exact .imp fun a => .imp_left (@H _)
/-! ### sublists -/
@[simp] theorem nil_sublist : ∀ l : List α, [] <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (nil_sublist l).cons a
@[simp] theorem Sublist.refl : ∀ l : List α, l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => (Sublist.refl l).cons₂ a
theorem Sublist.trans {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ <+ l₂) (h₂ : l₂ <+ l₃) : l₁ <+ l₃ := by
induction h₂ generalizing l₁ with
| slnil => exact h₁
| cons _ _ IH => exact (IH h₁).cons _
| @cons₂ l₂ _ a _ IH =>
generalize e : a :: l₂ = l₂'
match e ▸ h₁ with
| .slnil => apply nil_sublist
| .cons a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons
| .cons₂ a' h₁' => cases e; apply (IH h₁').cons₂
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Sublist Sublist := ⟨Sublist.trans⟩
@[simp] theorem sublist_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : l <+ a :: l := (Sublist.refl l).cons _
theorem sublist_of_cons_sublist : a :: l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂ :=
(sublist_cons a l₁).trans
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_left : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => nil_sublist _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_left l₁ l₂).cons₂ _
@[simp] theorem sublist_append_right : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₂ <+ l₁ ++ l₂
| [], _ => Sublist.refl _
| _ :: l₁, l₂ => (sublist_append_right l₁ l₂).cons _
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_left (s : l <+ l₁) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_left ..
theorem sublist_append_of_sublist_right (s : l <+ l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ :=
s.trans <| sublist_append_right ..
@[simp]
theorem cons_sublist_cons : a :: l₁ <+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun | .cons _ s => sublist_of_cons_sublist s | .cons₂ _ s => s, .cons₂ _⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_left : ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂
| [] => Iff.rfl
| _ :: l => cons_sublist_cons.trans (append_sublist_append_left l)
theorem Sublist.append_left : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l ++ l₁ <+ l ++ l₂ :=
fun h l => (append_sublist_append_left l).mpr h
theorem Sublist.append_right : l₁ <+ l₂ → ∀ l, l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l
| .slnil, _ => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons _
| .cons₂ _ h, _ => (h.append_right _).cons₂ _
theorem sublist_or_mem_of_sublist (h : l <+ l₁ ++ a :: l₂) : l <+ l₁ ++ l₂ ∨ a ∈ l := by
induction l₁ generalizing l with
| nil => match h with
| .cons _ h => exact .inl h
| .cons₂ _ h => exact .inr (.head ..)
| cons b l₁ IH =>
match h with
| .cons _ h => exact (IH h).imp_left (Sublist.cons _)
| .cons₂ _ h => exact (IH h).imp (Sublist.cons₂ _) (.tail _)
theorem Sublist.reverse : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons _ h => by rw [reverse_cons]; exact sublist_append_of_sublist_left h.reverse
| .cons₂ _ h => by rw [reverse_cons, reverse_cons]; exact h.reverse.append_right _
@[simp] theorem reverse_sublist : l₁.reverse <+ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => l₁.reverse_reverse ▸ l₂.reverse_reverse ▸ h.reverse, Sublist.reverse⟩
@[simp] theorem append_sublist_append_right (l) : l₁ ++ l <+ l₂ ++ l ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ :=
⟨fun h => by
have := h.reverse
simp only [reverse_append, append_sublist_append_left, reverse_sublist] at this
exact this,
fun h => h.append_right l⟩
theorem Sublist.append (hl : l₁ <+ l₂) (hr : r₁ <+ r₂) : l₁ ++ r₁ <+ l₂ ++ r₂ :=
(hl.append_right _).trans ((append_sublist_append_left _).2 hr)
theorem Sublist.subset : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁ ⊆ l₂
| .slnil, _, h => h
| .cons _ s, _, h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
| .cons₂ .., _, .head .. => .head ..
| .cons₂ _ s, _, .tail _ h => .tail _ (s.subset h)
instance : Trans (@Sublist α) Subset Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁.subset h₂⟩
instance : Trans Subset (@Sublist α) Subset :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => trans h₁ h₂.subset⟩
instance : Trans (Membership.mem : α → List α → Prop) Sublist Membership.mem :=
⟨fun h₁ h₂ => h₂.subset h₁⟩
theorem Sublist.length_le : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂
| .slnil => Nat.le_refl 0
| .cons _l s => le_succ_of_le (length_le s)
| .cons₂ _ s => succ_le_succ (length_le s)
@[simp] theorem sublist_nil {l : List α} : l <+ [] ↔ l = [] :=
⟨fun s => subset_nil.1 s.subset, fun H => H ▸ Sublist.refl _⟩
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length : l₁ <+ l₂ → length l₁ = length l₂ → l₁ = l₂
| .slnil, _ => rfl
| .cons a s, h => nomatch Nat.not_lt.2 s.length_le (h ▸ lt_succ_self _)
| .cons₂ a s, h => by rw [s.eq_of_length (succ.inj h)]
theorem Sublist.eq_of_length_le (s : l₁ <+ l₂) (h : length l₂ ≤ length l₁) : l₁ = l₂ :=
s.eq_of_length <| Nat.le_antisymm s.length_le h
@[simp] theorem singleton_sublist {a : α} {l} : [a] <+ l ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.subset (mem_singleton_self _), fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, _, rfl⟩ := append_of_mem h
exact ((nil_sublist _).cons₂ _).trans (sublist_append_right ..)
@[simp] theorem replicate_sublist_replicate {m n} (a : α) :
replicate m a <+ replicate n a ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.length_le; simp only [length_replicate] at this ⊢; exact this
· induction h with
| refl => apply Sublist.refl
| step => simp [*, replicate, Sublist.cons]
theorem isSublist_iff_sublist [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
l₁.isSublist l₂ ↔ l₁ <+ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> cases l₂ <;> simp [isSublist]
case cons.cons hd₁ tl₁ hd₂ tl₂ =>
if h_eq : hd₁ = hd₂ then
simp [h_eq, cons_sublist_cons, isSublist_iff_sublist]
else
simp only [beq_iff_eq, h_eq]
constructor
· intro h_sub
apply Sublist.cons
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mp h_sub
· intro h_sub
cases h_sub
case cons h_sub =>
exact isSublist_iff_sublist.mpr h_sub
case cons₂ =>
contradiction
instance [DecidableEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : Decidable (l₁ <+ l₂) :=
decidable_of_iff (l₁.isSublist l₂) isSublist_iff_sublist
/-! ### tail -/
theorem tail_eq_tailD (l) : @tail α l = tailD l [] := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem tail_eq_tail? (l) : @tail α l = (tail? l).getD [] := by simp [tail_eq_tailD]
/-! ### next? -/
@[simp] theorem next?_nil : @next? α [] = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem next?_cons (a l) : @next? α (a :: l) = some (a, l) := rfl
/-! ### get? -/
theorem get_eq_iff : List.get l n = x ↔ l.get? n.1 = some x := by simp [get?_eq_some]
theorem get?_inj
(h₀ : i < xs.length) (h₁ : Nodup xs) (h₂ : xs.get? i = xs.get? j) : i = j := by
induction xs generalizing i j with
| nil => cases h₀
| cons x xs ih =>
match i, j with
| 0, 0 => rfl
| i+1, j+1 => simp; cases h₁ with
| cons ha h₁ => exact ih (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h₀) h₁ h₂
| i+1, 0 => ?_ | 0, j+1 => ?_
all_goals
simp at h₂
cases h₁; rename_i h' h
have := h x ?_ rfl; cases this
rw [mem_iff_get?]
exact ⟨_, h₂⟩; exact ⟨_ , h₂.symm⟩
/-! ### drop -/
theorem tail_drop (l : List α) (n : Nat) : (l.drop n).tail = l.drop (n + 1) := by
induction l generalizing n with
| nil => simp
| cons hd tl hl =>
cases n
· simp
· simp [hl]
/-! ### modifyNth -/
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_nil (f : α → α) (n) : [].modifyNth f n = [] := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_zero_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f 0 = f a :: l := rfl
@[simp] theorem modifyNth_succ_cons (f : α → α) (a : α) (l : List α) (n) :
(a :: l).modifyNth f (n + 1) = a :: l.modifyNth f n := by rfl
theorem modifyNthTail_id : ∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNthTail id n = l
| 0, _ => rfl
| _+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons a) (modifyNthTail_id n l)
theorem eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail : ∀ n (l : List α), eraseIdx l n = modifyNthTail tail n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, a :: l => congrArg (cons _) (eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail _ _)
@[deprecated] alias removeNth_eq_nth_tail := eraseIdx_eq_modifyNthTail
theorem get?_modifyNth (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α) m, (modifyNth f n l).get? m = (fun a => if n = m then f a else a) <$> l.get? m
| n, l, 0 => by cases l <;> cases n <;> rfl
| n, [], _+1 => by cases n <;> rfl
| 0, _ :: l, m+1 => by cases h : l.get? m <;> simp [h, modifyNth, m.succ_ne_zero.symm]
| n+1, a :: l, m+1 =>
(get?_modifyNth f n l m).trans <| by
cases h' : l.get? m <;> by_cases h : n = m <;>
simp [h, if_pos, if_neg, Option.map, mt Nat.succ.inj, not_false_iff, h']
theorem modifyNthTail_length (f : List α → List α) (H : ∀ l, length (f l) = length l) :
∀ n l, length (modifyNthTail f n l) = length l
| 0, _ => H _
| _+1, [] => rfl
| _+1, _ :: _ => congrArg (·+1) (modifyNthTail_length _ H _ _)
theorem modifyNthTail_add (f : List α → List α) (n) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
modifyNthTail f (l₁.length + n) (l₁ ++ l₂) = l₁ ++ modifyNthTail f n l₂ := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, Nat.succ_add]
theorem exists_of_modifyNthTail (f : List α → List α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n ≤ l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNthTail f n l = l₁ ++ f l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, eq, hl⟩ : ∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n :=
⟨_, _, (take_append_drop n l).symm, length_take_of_le h⟩
⟨_, _, eq, hl, hl ▸ eq ▸ modifyNthTail_add (n := 0) ..⟩
@[simp] theorem modify_get?_length (f : α → α) : ∀ n l, length (modifyNth f n l) = length l :=
modifyNthTail_length _ fun l => by cases l <;> rfl
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_eq (f : α → α) (n) (l : List α) :
(modifyNth f n l).get? n = f <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_pos]
@[simp] theorem get?_modifyNth_ne (f : α → α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) :
(modifyNth f m l).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [get?_modifyNth, if_neg h, id_map']
theorem exists_of_modifyNth (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ modifyNth f n l = l₁ ++ f a :: l₂ :=
match exists_of_modifyNthTail _ (Nat.le_of_lt h) with
| ⟨_, _::_, eq, hl, H⟩ => ⟨_, _, _, eq, hl, H⟩
| ⟨_, [], eq, hl, _⟩ => nomatch Nat.ne_of_gt h (eq ▸ append_nil _ ▸ hl)
theorem modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop (f : List α → List α) (H : f [] = []) :
∀ n l, modifyNthTail f n l = take n l ++ f (drop n l)
| 0, _ => rfl
| _ + 1, [] => H.symm
| n + 1, b :: l => congrArg (cons b) (modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop f H n l)
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_drop (f : α → α) :
∀ n l, modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ modifyHead f (drop n l) :=
modifyNthTail_eq_take_drop _ rfl
theorem modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop (f : α → α) {n l} (h) :
modifyNth f n l = take n l ++ f (get l ⟨n, h⟩) :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_take_drop, drop_eq_get_cons h]; rfl
/-! ### set -/
theorem set_eq_modifyNth (a : α) : ∀ n (l : List α), set l n a = modifyNth (fun _ => a) n l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l => congrArg (cons _) (set_eq_modifyNth _ _ _)
theorem set_eq_take_cons_drop (a : α) {n l} (h : n < length l) :
set l n a = take n l ++ a :: drop (n + 1) l := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth, modifyNth_eq_take_cons_drop _ h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get? (f : α → α) :
∀ n (l : List α), l.modifyNth f n = ((fun a => l.set n (f a)) <$> l.get? n).getD l
| 0, l => by cases l <;> rfl
| n+1, [] => rfl
| n+1, b :: l =>
(congrArg (cons _) (modifyNth_eq_set_get? ..)).trans <| by cases h : l.get? n <;> simp [h]
theorem modifyNth_eq_set_get (f : α → α) {n} {l : List α} (h) :
l.modifyNth f n = l.set n (f (l.get ⟨n, h⟩)) := by
rw [modifyNth_eq_set_get?, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
theorem exists_of_set {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ a l₂, l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ := by
rw [set_eq_modifyNth]; exact exists_of_modifyNth _ h
theorem exists_of_set' {l : List α} (h : n < l.length) :
∃ l₁ l₂, l = l₁ ++ l.get ⟨n, h⟩ :: l₂ ∧ l₁.length = n ∧ l.set n a' = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
have ⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_set h; ⟨_, _, get_of_append h₁ h₂ ▸ h₁, h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_eq (a : α) (n) (l : List α) : (set l n a).get? n = (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_eq]
theorem get?_set_eq_of_lt (a : α) {n} {l : List α} (h : n < length l) :
(set l n a).get? n = some a := by rw [get?_set_eq, get?_eq_get h]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem get?_set_ne (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m ≠ n) : (set l m a).get? n = l.get? n := by
simp only [set_eq_modifyNth, get?_modifyNth_ne _ _ h]
theorem get?_set (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then (fun _ => a) <$> l.get? n else l.get? n := by
by_cases m = n <;> simp [*, get?_set_eq, get?_set_ne]
theorem get?_set_of_lt (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : n < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set, get?_eq_get h]
theorem get?_set_of_lt' (a : α) {m n} (l : List α) (h : m < length l) :
(set l m a).get? n = if m = n then some a else l.get? n := by
simp [get?_set]; split <;> subst_vars <;> simp [*, get?_eq_get h]
theorem drop_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : n < m) :
(l.set n a).drop m = l.drop m :=
List.ext fun i => by rw [get?_drop, get?_drop, get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
theorem take_set_of_lt (a : α) {n m : Nat} (l : List α) (h : m < n) :
(l.set n a).take m = l.take m :=
List.ext fun i => by
rw [get?_take_eq_if, get?_take_eq_if]
split
· next h' => rw [get?_set_ne _ _ (by omega)]
· rfl
/-! ### removeNth -/
theorem length_eraseIdx : ∀ {l i}, i < length l → length (@eraseIdx α l i) = length l - 1
| [], _, _ => rfl
| _::_, 0, _ => by simp [eraseIdx]
| x::xs, i+1, h => by
have : i < length xs := Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h
simp [eraseIdx, ← Nat.add_one]
rw [length_eraseIdx this, Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.zero_le _) this)]
@[deprecated] alias length_removeNth := length_eraseIdx
/-! ### tail -/
@[simp] theorem length_tail (l : List α) : length (tail l) = length l - 1 := by cases l <;> rfl
/-! ### eraseP -/
@[simp] theorem eraseP_nil : [].eraseP p = [] := rfl
theorem eraseP_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = bif p a then l else a :: l.eraseP p := rfl
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_pos {l : List α} (p) (h : p a) : (a :: l).eraseP p = l := by
simp [eraseP_cons, h]
@[simp] theorem eraseP_cons_of_neg {l : List α} (p) (h : ¬p a) :
(a :: l).eraseP p = a :: l.eraseP p := by simp [eraseP_cons, h]
theorem eraseP_of_forall_not {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → ¬p a) : l.eraseP p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_eraseP : ∀ {l : List α} {a} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a),
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂
| b :: l, a, al, pa =>
if pb : p b then
⟨b, [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
else
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
⟨c, b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP (p) (l : List α) :
l.eraseP p = l ∨
∃ a l₁ l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) ∧ p a ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.eraseP p = l₁ ++ l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, p a then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_eraseP ha pa)
else
.inl (eraseP_of_forall_not (h ⟨·, ·, ·⟩))
@[simp] theorem length_eraseP_of_mem (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a) :
length (l.eraseP p) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, _, _, e₁, e₂⟩ := exists_of_eraseP al pa
rw [e₂]; simp [length_append, e₁]; rfl
theorem eraseP_append_left {a : α} (pa : p a) :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, a ∈ l₁ → (l₁++l₂).eraseP p = l₁.eraseP p ++ l₂
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
by_cases h' : p x <;> simp [h']
rw [eraseP_append_left pa l₂ ((mem_cons.1 h).resolve_left (mt _ h'))]
intro | rfl => exact pa
theorem eraseP_append_right :
∀ {l₁ : List α} l₂, (∀ b ∈ l₁, ¬p b) → eraseP p (l₁++l₂) = l₁ ++ l₂.eraseP p
| [], l₂, _ => rfl
| x :: xs, l₂, h => by
simp [(forall_mem_cons.1 h).1, eraseP_append_right _ (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem eraseP_sublist (l : List α) : l.eraseP p <+ l := by
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; apply Sublist.refl
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, _, _, h₃, h₄⟩ => rw [h₄, h₃]; simp
theorem eraseP_subset (l : List α) : l.eraseP p ⊆ l := (eraseP_sublist l).subset
protected theorem Sublist.eraseP : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.eraseP p <+ l₂.eraseP p
| .slnil => Sublist.refl _
| .cons a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s.eraseP.trans (eraseP_sublist _), s.eraseP.cons _]
| .cons₂ a s => by
by_cases h : p a <;> simp [h]
exacts [s, s.eraseP]
theorem mem_of_mem_eraseP {l : List α} : a ∈ l.eraseP p → a ∈ l := (eraseP_subset _ ·)
@[simp] theorem mem_eraseP_of_neg {l : List α} (pa : ¬p a) : a ∈ l.eraseP p ↔ a ∈ l := by
refine ⟨mem_of_mem_eraseP, fun al => ?_⟩
match exists_or_eq_self_of_eraseP p l with
| .inl h => rw [h]; assumption
| .inr ⟨c, l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ =>
rw [h₄]; rw [h₃] at al
have : a ≠ c := fun h => (h ▸ pa).elim h₂
simp [this] at al; simp [al]
theorem eraseP_map (f : β → α) : ∀ (l : List β), (map f l).eraseP p = map f (l.eraseP (p ∘ f))
| [] => rfl
| b::l => by by_cases h : p (f b) <;> simp [h, eraseP_map f l, eraseP_cons_of_pos]
@[simp] theorem extractP_eq_find?_eraseP
(l : List α) : extractP p l = (find? p l, eraseP p l) := by
let rec go (acc) : ∀ xs, l = acc.data ++ xs →
extractP.go p l xs acc = (xs.find? p, acc.data ++ xs.eraseP p)
| [] => fun h => by simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP, h]
| x::xs => by
simp [extractP.go, find?, eraseP]; cases p x <;> simp
· intro h; rw [go _ xs]; {simp}; simp [h]
exact go #[] _ rfl
/-! ### erase -/
section erase
variable [BEq α]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP' (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a = l.eraseP (· == a) := by
induction l
· simp
· next b t ih =>
rw [erase_cons, eraseP_cons, ih]
if h : b == a then simp [h] else simp [h]
theorem erase_eq_eraseP [LawfulBEq α] (a : α) : ∀ l : List α, l.erase a = l.eraseP (a == ·)
| [] => rfl
| b :: l => by
if h : a = b then simp [h] else simp [h, Ne.symm h, erase_eq_eraseP a l]
theorem exists_erase_eq [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
∃ l₁ l₂, a ∉ l₁ ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.erase a = l₁ ++ l₂ := by
let ⟨_, l₁, l₂, h₁, e, h₂, h₃⟩ := exists_of_eraseP h (beq_self_eq_true _)
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact ⟨l₁, l₂, fun h => h₁ _ h (beq_self_eq_true _), eq_of_beq e ▸ h₂, h₃⟩
@[simp] theorem length_erase_of_mem [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l) :
length (l.erase a) = Nat.pred (length l) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact length_eraseP_of_mem h (beq_self_eq_true a)
theorem erase_append_left [LawfulBEq α] {l₁ : List α} (l₂) (h : a ∈ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = l₁.erase a ++ l₂ := by
simp [erase_eq_eraseP]; exact eraseP_append_left (beq_self_eq_true a) l₂ h
theorem erase_append_right [LawfulBEq α] {a : α} {l₁ : List α} (l₂ : List α) (h : a ∉ l₁) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).erase a = (l₁ ++ l₂.erase a) := by
rw [erase_eq_eraseP, erase_eq_eraseP, eraseP_append_right]
intros b h' h''; rw [eq_of_beq h''] at h; exact h h'
theorem erase_sublist (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a <+ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP' a l ▸ eraseP_sublist l
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (l : List α) : l.erase a ⊆ l := (erase_sublist a l).subset
theorem Sublist.erase (a : α) {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h : l₁ <+ l₂) : l₁.erase a <+ l₂.erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq_eraseP']; exact h.eraseP
@[deprecated] alias sublist.erase := Sublist.erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase {a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.erase b) : a ∈ l := erase_subset _ _ h
@[simp] theorem mem_erase_of_ne [LawfulBEq α] {a b : α} {l : List α} (ab : a ≠ b) :
a ∈ l.erase b ↔ a ∈ l :=
erase_eq_eraseP b l ▸ mem_eraseP_of_neg (mt eq_of_beq ab.symm)
theorem erase_comm [LawfulBEq α] (a b : α) (l : List α) :
(l.erase a).erase b = (l.erase b).erase a := by
if ab : a == b then rw [eq_of_beq ab] else ?_
if ha : a ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem ha, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha)]
if hb : b ∈ l then ?_ else
simp only [erase_of_not_mem hb, erase_of_not_mem (mt mem_of_mem_erase hb)]
match l, l.erase a, exists_erase_eq ha with
| _, _, ⟨l₁, l₂, ha', rfl, rfl⟩ =>
if h₁ : b ∈ l₁ then
rw [erase_append_left _ h₁, erase_append_left _ h₁,
erase_append_right _ (mt mem_of_mem_erase ha'), erase_cons_head]
else
rw [erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ h₁, erase_append_right _ ha',
erase_cons_tail _ ab, erase_cons_head]
end erase
/-! ### filter and partition -/
@[simp] theorem filter_sublist {p : α → Bool} : ∀ (l : List α), filter p l <+ l
| [] => .slnil
| a :: l => by rw [filter]; split <;> simp [Sublist.cons, Sublist.cons₂, filter_sublist l]
/-! ### filterMap -/
theorem length_filter_le (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) :
(l.filter p).length ≤ l.length := (filter_sublist _).length_le
theorem length_filterMap_le (f : α → Option β) (l : List α) :
(filterMap f l).length ≤ l.length := by
rw [← length_map _ some, map_filterMap_some_eq_filter_map_is_some, ← length_map _ f]
apply length_filter_le
protected theorem Sublist.filterMap (f : α → Option β) (s : l₁ <+ l₂) :
filterMap f l₁ <+ filterMap f l₂ := by
induction s <;> simp <;> split <;> simp [*, cons, cons₂]
theorem Sublist.filter (p : α → Bool) {l₁ l₂} (s : l₁ <+ l₂) : filter p l₁ <+ filter p l₂ := by
rw [← filterMap_eq_filter]; apply s.filterMap
@[simp]
theorem filter_eq_self {l} : filter p l = l ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a := by
induction l with simp
| cons a l ih =>
cases h : p a <;> simp [*]
intro h; exact Nat.lt_irrefl _ (h ▸ length_filter_le p l)
@[simp]
theorem filter_length_eq_length {l} : (filter p l).length = l.length ↔ ∀ a ∈ l, p a :=
Iff.trans ⟨l.filter_sublist.eq_of_length, congrArg length⟩ filter_eq_self
/-! ### findIdx -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx_nil {α : Type _} (p : α → Bool) : [].findIdx p = 0 := rfl
theorem findIdx_cons (p : α → Bool) (b : α) (l : List α) :
(b :: l).findIdx p = bif p b then 0 else (l.findIdx p) + 1 := by
cases H : p b with
| true => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go]
| false => simp [H, findIdx, findIdx.go, findIdx_go_succ]
where
findIdx_go_succ (p : α → Bool) (l : List α) (n : Nat) :
List.findIdx.go p l (n + 1) = (findIdx.go p l n) + 1 := by
cases l with
| nil => unfold findIdx.go; exact Nat.succ_eq_add_one n
| cons head tail =>
unfold findIdx.go
cases p head <;> simp only [cond_false, cond_true]
exact findIdx_go_succ p tail (n + 1)
theorem findIdx_of_get?_eq_some {xs : List α} (w : xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some y) : p y := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih => by_cases h : p x <;> simp_all [findIdx_cons]
theorem findIdx_get {xs : List α} {w : xs.findIdx p < xs.length} :
p (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, w⟩) :=
xs.findIdx_of_get?_eq_some (get?_eq_get w)
theorem findIdx_lt_length_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.findIdx p < xs.length := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
by_cases p x
· simp_all only [forall_exists_index, and_imp, mem_cons, exists_eq_or_imp, true_or,
findIdx_cons, cond_true, length_cons]
apply Nat.succ_pos
· simp_all [findIdx_cons]
refine Nat.succ_lt_succ ?_
obtain ⟨x', m', h'⟩ := h
exact ih x' m' h'
theorem findIdx_get?_eq_get_of_exists {xs : List α} (h : ∃ x ∈ xs, p x) :
xs.get? (xs.findIdx p) = some (xs.get ⟨xs.findIdx p, xs.findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h⟩) :=
get?_eq_get (findIdx_lt_length_of_exists h)
/-! ### findIdx? -/
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_nil : ([] : List α).findIdx? p i = none := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_cons :
(x :: xs).findIdx? p i = if p x then some i else findIdx? p xs (i + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_succ :
(xs : List α).findIdx? p (i+1) = (xs.findIdx? p i).map fun i => i + 1 := by
induction xs generalizing i with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_eq_some_iff (xs : List α) (p : α → Bool) :
xs.findIdx? p = some i ↔ (xs.take (i + 1)).map p = replicate i false ++ [true] := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, take_succ_cons, map_cons]
split <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_some {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = some i) :
match xs.get? i with | some a => p a | none => false := by
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
split at w <;> cases i <;> simp_all
theorem findIdx?_of_eq_none {xs : List α} {p : α → Bool} (w : xs.findIdx? p = none) :
∀ i, match xs.get? i with | some a => ¬ p a | none => true := by
intro i
induction xs generalizing i with
| nil => simp_all
| cons x xs ih =>
simp_all only [Bool.not_eq_true, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ]
cases i with
| zero =>
split at w <;> simp_all
| succ i =>
simp only [get?_cons_succ]
apply ih
split at w <;> simp_all
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_append :
(xs ++ ys : List α).findIdx? p =
(xs.findIdx? p <|> (ys.findIdx? p).map fun i => i + xs.length) := by
induction xs with simp
| cons _ _ _ => split <;> simp_all [Option.map_orElse, Option.map_map]; rfl
@[simp] theorem findIdx?_replicate :
(replicate n a).findIdx? p = if 0 < n ∧ p a then some 0 else none := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
simp only [replicate, findIdx?_cons, Nat.zero_add, findIdx?_succ, Nat.zero_lt_succ, true_and]
split <;> simp_all
/-! ### pairwise -/
theorem Pairwise.sublist : l₁ <+ l₂ → l₂.Pairwise R → l₁.Pairwise R
| .slnil, h => h
| .cons _ s, .cons _ h₂ => h₂.sublist s
| .cons₂ _ s, .cons h₁ h₂ => (h₂.sublist s).cons fun _ h => h₁ _ (s.subset h)
theorem pairwise_map {l : List α} :
(l.map f).Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise fun a b => R (f a) (f b) := by
induction l
· simp
· simp only [map, pairwise_cons, forall_mem_map_iff, *]
theorem pairwise_append {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
(l₁ ++ l₂).Pairwise R ↔ l₁.Pairwise R ∧ l₂.Pairwise R ∧ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, R a b := by
induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_imp, forall_and, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
theorem pairwise_reverse {l : List α} :
l.reverse.Pairwise R ↔ l.Pairwise (fun a b => R b a) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, pairwise_append, and_comm]
theorem Pairwise.imp {α R S} (H : ∀ {a b}, R a b → S a b) :
∀ {l : List α}, l.Pairwise R → l.Pairwise S
| _, .nil => .nil
| _, .cons h₁ h₂ => .cons (H ∘ h₁ ·) (h₂.imp H)
/-! ### replaceF -/
theorem replaceF_nil : [].replaceF p = [] := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons (a : α) (l : List α) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = match p a with
| none => a :: replaceF p l
| some a' => a' :: l := rfl
theorem replaceF_cons_of_some {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = some a') :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a' :: l := by
simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_cons_of_none {l : List α} (p) (h : p a = none) :
(a :: l).replaceF p = a :: l.replaceF p := by simp [replaceF_cons, h]
theorem replaceF_of_forall_none {l : List α} (h : ∀ a, a ∈ l → p a = none) : l.replaceF p = l := by
induction l with
| nil => rfl
| cons _ _ ih => simp [h _ (.head ..), ih (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2]
theorem exists_of_replaceF : ∀ {l : List α} {a a'} (al : a ∈ l) (pa : p a = some a'),
∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂
| b :: l, a, a', al, pa =>
match pb : p b with
| some b' => ⟨b, b', [], l, forall_mem_nil _, pb, by simp [pb]⟩
| none =>
match al with
| .head .. => nomatch pb.symm.trans pa
| .tail _ al =>
let ⟨c, c', l₁, l₂, h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄⟩ := exists_of_replaceF al pa
⟨c, c', b::l₁, l₂, (forall_mem_cons ..).2 ⟨pb, h₁⟩,
h₂, by rw [h₃, cons_append], by simp [pb, h₄]⟩
theorem exists_or_eq_self_of_replaceF (p) (l : List α) :
l.replaceF p = l ∨ ∃ a a' l₁ l₂,
(∀ b ∈ l₁, p b = none) ∧ p a = some a' ∧ l = l₁ ++ a :: l₂ ∧ l.replaceF p = l₁ ++ a' :: l₂ :=
if h : ∃ a ∈ l, (p a).isSome then
let ⟨_, ha, pa⟩ := h
.inr (exists_of_replaceF ha (Option.get_mem pa))
else
.inl <| replaceF_of_forall_none fun a ha =>
Option.not_isSome_iff_eq_none.1 fun h' => h ⟨a, ha, h'⟩
@[simp] theorem length_replaceF : length (replaceF f l) = length l := by
induction l <;> simp [replaceF]; split <;> simp [*]
/-! ### disjoint -/
theorem disjoint_symm (d : Disjoint l₁ l₂) : Disjoint l₂ l₁ := fun _ i₂ i₁ => d i₁ i₂
theorem disjoint_comm : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ Disjoint l₂ l₁ := ⟨disjoint_symm, disjoint_symm⟩
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ := by simp [Disjoint]
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ l₂ → a ∉ l₁ := disjoint_comm
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint l₁ l₂ ↔ ∀ a ∈ l₁, ∀ b ∈ l₂, a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h _ al1 _ bl2 ab => h al1 (ab ▸ bl2), fun h _ al1 al2 => h _ al1 _ al2 rfl⟩
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (ss : l₁ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l l₂) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m => d (ss m)
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (ss : l₂ ⊆ l) (d : Disjoint l₁ l) : Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
fun _ m m₁ => d m (ss m₁)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_left {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint (a :: l₁) l₂ → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_left (subset_cons _ _)
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_cons_right {l₁ l₂} : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) → Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_of_subset_right (subset_cons _ _)
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_left (l : List α) : Disjoint [] l := fun a => (not_mem_nil a).elim
@[simp] theorem disjoint_nil_right (l : List α) : Disjoint l [] := by
rw [disjoint_comm]; exact disjoint_nil_left _
@[simp 1100] theorem singleton_disjoint : Disjoint [a] l ↔ a ∉ l := by simp [Disjoint]
@[simp 1100] theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint l [a] ↔ a ∉ l := by
rw [disjoint_comm, singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_left : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l ↔ Disjoint l₁ l ∧ Disjoint l₂ l := by
simp [Disjoint, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_append_right : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂) ↔ Disjoint l l₁ ∧ Disjoint l l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_append_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_left : Disjoint (a::l₁) l₂ ↔ (a ∉ l₂) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_left (l₁ := [a])).trans <| by simp [singleton_disjoint]
@[simp] theorem disjoint_cons_right : Disjoint l₁ (a :: l₂) ↔ (a ∉ l₁) ∧ Disjoint l₁ l₂ :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_cons_left]; simp [disjoint_comm]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_left (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₁ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_left_right (d : Disjoint (l₁ ++ l₂) l) : Disjoint l₂ l :=
(disjoint_append_left.1 d).2
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_left (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₁ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).1
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_append_right_right (d : Disjoint l (l₁ ++ l₂)) : Disjoint l l₂ :=
(disjoint_append_right.1 d).2
/-! ### foldl / foldr -/
theorem foldl_hom (f : α₁ → α₂) (g₁ : α₁ → β → α₁) (g₂ : α₂ → β → α₂) (l : List β) (init : α₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ (f x) y = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldl g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldl g₁ init) := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, H]
theorem foldr_hom (f : β₁ → β₂) (g₁ : α → β₁ → β₁) (g₂ : α → β₂ → β₂) (l : List α) (init : β₁)
(H : ∀ x y, g₂ x (f y) = f (g₁ x y)) : l.foldr g₂ (f init) = f (l.foldr g₁ init) := by
induction l <;> simp [*, H]
/-! ### union -/
section union
variable [BEq α]
theorem union_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∪ l₂ = foldr .insert l₂ l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem nil_union (l : List α) : nil ∪ l = l := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem cons_union (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
(a :: l₁) ∪ l₂ = (l₁ ∪ l₂).insert a := by simp [List.union_def, foldr]
@[simp] theorem mem_union_iff [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∪ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∨ x ∈ l₂ := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*, or_assoc]
end union
/-! ### inter -/
theorem inter_def [BEq α] (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ ∩ l₂ = filter (elem · l₂) l₁ := rfl
@[simp] theorem mem_inter_iff [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {x : α} {l₁ l₂ : List α} :
x ∈ l₁ ∩ l₂ ↔ x ∈ l₁ ∧ x ∈ l₂ := by
cases l₁ <;> simp [List.inter_def, mem_filter]
/-! ### product -/
/-- List.prod satisfies a specification of cartesian product on lists. -/
@[simp]
theorem pair_mem_product {xs : List α} {ys : List β} {x : α} {y : β} :
(x, y) ∈ product xs ys ↔ x ∈ xs ∧ y ∈ ys := by
simp only [product, and_imp, mem_map, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right_right, mem_bind, iff_self]
/-! ### leftpad -/
/-- The length of the List returned by `List.leftpad n a l` is equal
to the larger of `n` and `l.length` -/
@[simp]
theorem leftpad_length (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(leftpad n a l).length = max n l.length := by
simp only [leftpad, length_append, length_replicate, Nat.sub_add_eq_max]
theorem leftpad_prefix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) :
replicate (n - length l) a <+: leftpad n a l := by
simp only [IsPrefix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro l rfl
theorem leftpad_suffix (n : Nat) (a : α) (l : List α) : l <:+ (leftpad n a l) := by
simp only [IsSuffix, leftpad]
exact Exists.intro (replicate (n - length l) a) rfl
/-! ### monadic operations -/
-- we use ForIn.forIn as the simp normal form
@[simp] theorem forIn_eq_forIn [Monad m] : @List.forIn α β m _ = forIn := rfl
theorem forIn_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m]
(f : α → β → m (ForInStep β)) (l : List α) (init : β) :
forIn l init f = ForInStep.run <$> (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f l := by
induction l generalizing init <;> simp [*, map_eq_pure_bind]
congr; ext (b | b) <;> simp
@[simp] theorem forM_append [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] (l₁ l₂ : List α) (f : α → m PUnit) :
(l₁ ++ l₂).forM f = (do l₁.forM f; l₂.forM f) := by induction l₁ <;> simp [*]
/-! ### diff -/
section Diff
variable [BEq α]
variable [LawfulBEq α]
@[simp] theorem diff_nil (l : List α) : l.diff [] = l := rfl
@[simp] theorem diff_cons (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by
simp_all [List.diff, erase_of_not_mem]
theorem diff_cons_right (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.diff l₂).erase a := by
apply Eq.symm; induction l₂ generalizing l₁ <;> simp [erase_comm, *]
theorem diff_erase (l₁ l₂ : List α) (a : α) : (l₁.diff l₂).erase a = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := by
rw [← diff_cons_right, diff_cons]
@[simp] theorem nil_diff (l : List α) : [].diff l = [] := by
induction l <;> simp [*, erase_of_not_mem]
theorem cons_diff (a : α) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = if a ∈ l₂ then l₁.diff (l₂.erase a) else a :: l₁.diff l₂ := by
induction l₂ generalizing l₁ with
| nil => rfl
| cons b l₂ ih =>
by_cases h : a = b
next => simp [*]
next =>
have := Ne.symm h
simp[*]
theorem cons_diff_of_mem {a : α} {l₂ : List α} (h : a ∈ l₂) (l₁ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = l₁.diff (l₂.erase a) := by rw [cons_diff, if_pos h]
theorem cons_diff_of_not_mem {a : α} {l₂ : List α} (h : a ∉ l₂) (l₁ : List α) :
(a :: l₁).diff l₂ = a :: l₁.diff l₂ := by rw [cons_diff, if_neg h]
theorem diff_eq_foldl : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.diff l₂ = foldl List.erase l₁ l₂
| _, [] => rfl
| l₁, a :: l₂ => (diff_cons l₁ l₂ a).trans (diff_eq_foldl _ _)
@[simp] theorem diff_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₁.diff (l₂ ++ l₃) = (l₁.diff l₂).diff l₃ := by
simp only [diff_eq_foldl, foldl_append]
theorem diff_sublist : ∀ l₁ l₂ : List α, l₁.diff l₂ <+ l₁
| _, [] => .refl _
| l₁, a :: l₂ =>
calc
l₁.diff (a :: l₂) = (l₁.erase a).diff l₂ := diff_cons ..
_ <+ l₁.erase a := diff_sublist ..
_ <+ l₁ := erase_sublist ..
theorem diff_subset (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁.diff l₂ ⊆ l₁ := (diff_sublist ..).subset
theorem mem_diff_of_mem {a : α} : ∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, a ∈ l₁ → a ∉ l₂ → a ∈ l₁.diff l₂
| _, [], h₁, _ => h₁
| l₁, b :: l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [diff_cons]
exact mem_diff_of_mem ((mem_erase_of_ne <| ne_of_not_mem_cons h₂).2 h₁) (mt (.tail _) h₂)
theorem Sublist.diff_right : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → l₁.diff l₃ <+ l₂.diff l₃
| _, _, [], h => h
| l₁, l₂, a :: l₃, h => by simp only [diff_cons, (h.erase _).diff_right]
theorem Sublist.erase_diff_erase_sublist {a : α} :
∀ {l₁ l₂ : List α}, l₁ <+ l₂ → (l₂.erase a).diff (l₁.erase a) <+ l₂.diff l₁
| [], l₂, _ => erase_sublist _ _
| b :: l₁, l₂, h => by
if heq : b = a then
simp [heq]
else
simp [heq, erase_comm a]
exact (erase_cons_head b _ ▸ h.erase b).erase_diff_erase_sublist
end Diff
/-! ### prefix, suffix, infix -/
@[simp] theorem prefix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <+: l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₂, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_append (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₂ <:+ l₁ ++ l₂ := ⟨l₁, rfl⟩
theorem infix_append (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ l₂ ++ l₃ := ⟨l₁, l₃, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem infix_append' (l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α) : l₂ <:+: l₁ ++ (l₂ ++ l₃) := by
rw [← List.append_assoc]; apply infix_append
theorem IsPrefix.isInfix : l₁ <+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨[], t, h⟩
theorem IsSuffix.isInfix : l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₁ <:+: l₂ := fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨t, [], by rw [h, append_nil]⟩
theorem nil_prefix (l : List α) : [] <+: l := ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem nil_suffix (l : List α) : [] <:+ l := ⟨l, append_nil _⟩
theorem nil_infix (l : List α) : [] <:+: l := (nil_prefix _).isInfix
theorem prefix_refl (l : List α) : l <+: l := ⟨[], append_nil _⟩
theorem suffix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+ l := ⟨[], rfl⟩
theorem infix_refl (l : List α) : l <:+: l := (prefix_refl l).isInfix
@[simp] theorem suffix_cons (a : α) : ∀ l, l <:+ a :: l := suffix_append [a]
theorem infix_cons : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ => ⟨a :: L₁, L₂, h ▸ rfl⟩
theorem infix_concat : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <:+: concat l₂ a := fun ⟨L₁, L₂, h⟩ =>
⟨L₁, concat L₂ a, by simp [← h, concat_eq_append, append_assoc]⟩
theorem IsPrefix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₂ → l₂ <+: l₃ → l₁ <+: l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨r₁ ++ r₂, (append_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
theorem IsSuffix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+ l₂ → l₂ <:+ l₃ → l₁ <:+ l₃
| _, _, _, ⟨l₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, append_assoc _ _ _⟩
theorem IsInfix.trans : ∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₂ <:+: l₃ → l₁ <:+: l₃
| l, _, _, ⟨l₁, r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨l₂, r₂, rfl⟩ => ⟨l₂ ++ l₁, r₁ ++ r₂, by simp only [append_assoc]⟩
protected theorem IsInfix.sublist : l₁ <:+: l₂ → l₁ <+ l₂
| ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ (sublist_append_right ..).trans (sublist_append_left ..)
protected theorem IsInfix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsPrefix.sublist (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsPrefix.subset (hl : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
protected theorem IsSuffix.sublist (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ <+ l₂ :=
h.isInfix.sublist
protected theorem IsSuffix.subset (hl : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁ ⊆ l₂ :=
hl.sublist.subset
@[simp] theorem reverse_suffix : reverse l₁ <:+ reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, ← reverse_append, e, reverse_reverse]⟩,
fun ⟨r, e⟩ => ⟨reverse r, by rw [← reverse_append, e]⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem reverse_prefix : reverse l₁ <+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
rw [← reverse_suffix]; simp only [reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem reverse_infix : reverse l₁ <:+: reverse l₂ ↔ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩, fun ⟨s, t, e⟩ => ⟨reverse t, reverse s, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← reverse_reverse l₁, append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e,
reverse_reverse]
· rw [append_assoc, ← reverse_append, ← reverse_append, e]
theorem IsInfix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsPrefix.length_le (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
theorem IsSuffix.length_le (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length ≤ l₂.length :=
h.sublist.length_le
@[simp] theorem infix_nil : l <:+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ infix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem prefix_nil : l <+: [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ prefix_refl _)⟩
@[simp] theorem suffix_nil : l <:+ [] ↔ l = [] := ⟨(sublist_nil.1 ·.sublist), (· ▸ suffix_refl _)⟩
theorem infix_iff_prefix_suffix (l₁ l₂ : List α) : l₁ <:+: l₂ ↔ ∃ t, l₁ <+: t ∧ t <:+ l₂ :=
⟨fun ⟨_, t, e⟩ => ⟨l₁ ++ t, ⟨_, rfl⟩, e ▸ append_assoc .. ▸ ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩,
fun ⟨_, ⟨t, rfl⟩, s, e⟩ => ⟨s, t, append_assoc .. ▸ e⟩⟩
theorem IsInfix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsPrefix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <+: l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem IsSuffix.eq_of_length (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) : l₁.length = l₂.length → l₁ = l₂ :=
h.sublist.eq_of_length
theorem prefix_of_prefix_length_le :
∀ {l₁ l₂ l₃ : List α}, l₁ <+: l₃ → l₂ <+: l₃ → length l₁ ≤ length l₂ → l₁ <+: l₂
| [], l₂, _, _, _, _ => nil_prefix _
| a :: l₁, b :: l₂, _, ⟨r₁, rfl⟩, ⟨r₂, e⟩, ll => by
injection e with _ e'; subst b
rcases prefix_of_prefix_length_le ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, e'⟩ (le_of_succ_le_succ ll) with ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
exact ⟨r₃, rfl⟩
theorem prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (h₁ : l₁ <+: l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <+: l₃) : l₁ <+: l₂ ∨ l₂ <+: l₁ :=
(Nat.le_total (length l₁) (length l₂)).imp (prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₁ h₂)
(prefix_of_prefix_length_le h₂ h₁)
theorem suffix_of_suffix_length_le
(h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) (ll : length l₁ ≤ length l₂) : l₁ <:+ l₂ :=
reverse_prefix.1 <|
prefix_of_prefix_length_le (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂) (by simp [ll])
theorem suffix_or_suffix_of_suffix (h₁ : l₁ <:+ l₃) (h₂ : l₂ <:+ l₃) : l₁ <:+ l₂ ∨ l₂ <:+ l₁ :=
(prefix_or_prefix_of_prefix (reverse_prefix.2 h₁) (reverse_prefix.2 h₂)).imp reverse_prefix.1
reverse_prefix.1
theorem suffix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+ a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ = a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+ l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl hl₃
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, hl₄⟩
· rintro (rfl | hl₁)
· exact (a :: l₂).suffix_refl
· exact hl₁.trans (l₂.suffix_cons _)
theorem infix_cons_iff : l₁ <:+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ∨ l₁ <:+: l₂ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hd, tl⟩, t, hl₃⟩
· exact Or.inl ⟨t, hl₃⟩
· simp only [cons_append] at hl₃
injection hl₃ with _ hl₄
exact Or.inr ⟨_, t, hl₄⟩
· rintro (h | hl₁)
· exact h.isInfix
· exact infix_cons hl₁
theorem infix_of_mem_join : ∀ {L : List (List α)}, l ∈ L → l <:+: join L
| l' :: _, h =>
match h with
| List.Mem.head .. => infix_append [] _ _
| List.Mem.tail _ hlMemL =>
IsInfix.trans (infix_of_mem_join hlMemL) <| (suffix_append _ _).isInfix
theorem prefix_append_right_inj (l) : l ++ l₁ <+: l ++ l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [append_assoc, append_right_inj]
@[simp]
theorem prefix_cons_inj (a) : a :: l₁ <+: a :: l₂ ↔ l₁ <+: l₂ :=
prefix_append_right_inj [a]
theorem take_prefix (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+: l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem drop_suffix (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <:+ l :=
⟨_, take_append_drop _ _⟩
theorem take_sublist (n) (l : List α) : take n l <+ l :=
(take_prefix n l).sublist
theorem drop_sublist (n) (l : List α) : drop n l <+ l :=
(drop_suffix n l).sublist
theorem take_subset (n) (l : List α) : take n l ⊆ l :=
(take_sublist n l).subset
theorem drop_subset (n) (l : List α) : drop n l ⊆ l :=
(drop_sublist n l).subset
theorem mem_of_mem_take {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.take n) : a ∈ l :=
take_subset n l h
theorem IsPrefix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply prefix_append
theorem IsSuffix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+ l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+ l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append]; apply suffix_append
theorem IsInfix.filter (p : α → Bool) ⦃l₁ l₂ : List α⦄ (h : l₁ <:+: l₂) :
l₁.filter p <:+: l₂.filter p := by
obtain ⟨xs, ys, rfl⟩ := h
rw [filter_append, filter_append]; apply infix_append _
/-! ### drop -/
theorem mem_of_mem_drop {n} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ l.drop n) : a ∈ l := drop_subset _ _ h
theorem disjoint_take_drop : ∀ {l : List α}, l.Nodup → m ≤ n → Disjoint (l.take m) (l.drop n)
| [], _, _ => by simp
| x :: xs, hl, h => by
cases m <;> cases n <;> simp only [disjoint_cons_left, drop, not_mem_nil, disjoint_nil_left,
take, not_false_eq_true, and_self]
· case succ.zero => cases h
· cases hl with | cons h₀ h₁ =>
refine ⟨fun h => h₀ _ (mem_of_mem_drop h) rfl, ?_⟩
exact disjoint_take_drop h₁ (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ h)
/-! ### Chain -/
attribute [simp] Chain.nil
@[simp]
theorem chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} : Chain R a (b :: l) ↔ R a b ∧ Chain R b l :=
⟨fun p => by cases p with | cons n p => exact ⟨n, p⟩,
fun ⟨n, p⟩ => p.cons n⟩
theorem rel_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : R a b :=
(chain_cons.1 p).1
theorem chain_of_chain_cons {a b : α} {l : List α} (p : Chain R a (b :: l)) : Chain R b l :=
(chain_cons.1 p).2
theorem Chain.imp' {R S : α → α → Prop} (HRS : ∀ ⦃a b⦄, R a b → S a b) {a b : α}
(Hab : ∀ ⦃c⦄, R a c → S b c) {l : List α} (p : Chain R a l) : Chain S b l := by
induction p generalizing b with
| nil => constructor
| cons r _ ih =>
constructor
· exact Hab r
· exact ih (@HRS _)
theorem Chain.imp {R S : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, R a b → S a b) {a : α} {l : List α}
(p : Chain R a l) : Chain S a l :=
p.imp' H (H a)
protected theorem Pairwise.chain (p : Pairwise R (a :: l)) : Chain R a l := by
let ⟨r, p'⟩ := pairwise_cons.1 p; clear p
induction p' generalizing a with
| nil => exact Chain.nil
| @cons b l r' _ IH =>
simp only [chain_cons, forall_mem_cons] at r
exact chain_cons.2 ⟨r.1, IH r'⟩
/-! ### range', range -/
@[simp] theorem length_range' (s step) : ∀ n : Nat, length (range' s n step) = n
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => congrArg succ (length_range' _ _ _)
@[simp] theorem range'_eq_nil : range' s n step = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range']
theorem mem_range' : ∀{n}, m ∈ range' s n step ↔ ∃ i < n, m = s + step * i
| 0 => by simp [range', Nat.not_lt_zero]
| n + 1 => by
have h (i) : i ≤ n ↔ i = 0 ∨ ∃ j, i = succ j ∧ j < n := by cases i <;> simp [Nat.succ_le]
simp [range', mem_range', Nat.lt_succ, h]; simp only [← exists_and_right, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]; simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_range'_1 : m ∈ range' s n ↔ s ≤ m ∧ m < s + n := by
simp [mem_range']; exact ⟨
fun ⟨i, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨Nat.le_add_right .., Nat.add_lt_add_left h _⟩,
fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨m - s, Nat.sub_lt_left_of_lt_add h₁ h₂, (Nat.add_sub_cancel' h₁).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem map_add_range' (a) : ∀ s n step, map (a + ·) (range' s n step) = range' (a + s) n step
| _, 0, _ => rfl
| s, n + 1, step => by simp [range', map_add_range' _ (s + step) n step, Nat.add_assoc]
theorem map_sub_range' (a s n : Nat) (h : a ≤ s) :
map (· - a) (range' s n step) = range' (s - a) n step := by
conv => lhs; rw [← Nat.add_sub_cancel' h]
rw [← map_add_range', map_map, (?_ : _∘_ = _), map_id]
funext x; apply Nat.add_sub_cancel_left
theorem chain_succ_range' : ∀ s n step : Nat,
Chain (fun a b => b = a + step) s (range' (s + step) n step)
| _, 0, _ => Chain.nil
| s, n + 1, step => (chain_succ_range' (s + step) n step).cons rfl
theorem chain_lt_range' (s n : Nat) {step} (h : 0 < step) :
Chain (· < ·) s (range' (s + step) n step) :=
(chain_succ_range' s n step).imp fun _ _ e => e.symm ▸ Nat.lt_add_of_pos_right h
theorem range'_append : ∀ s m n step : Nat,
range' s m step ++ range' (s + step * m) n step = range' s (n + m) step
| s, 0, n, step => rfl
| s, m + 1, n, step => by
simpa [range', Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
using range'_append (s + step) m n step
@[simp] theorem range'_append_1 (s m n : Nat) :
range' s m ++ range' (s + m) n = range' s (n + m) := by simpa using range'_append s m n 1
theorem range'_sublist_right {s m n : Nat} : range' s m step <+ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [length_range'] using h.length_le,
fun h => by rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel h, ← range'_append]; apply sublist_append_left⟩
theorem range'_subset_right {s m n : Nat} (step0 : 0 < step) :
range' s m step ⊆ range' s n step ↔ m ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => Nat.le_of_not_lt fun hn => ?_, fun h => (range'_sublist_right.2 h).subset⟩
have ⟨i, h', e⟩ := mem_range'.1 <| h <| mem_range'.2 ⟨_, hn, rfl⟩
exact Nat.ne_of_gt h' (Nat.eq_of_mul_eq_mul_left step0 (Nat.add_left_cancel e))
theorem range'_subset_right_1 {s m n : Nat} : range' s m ⊆ range' s n ↔ m ≤ n :=
range'_subset_right (by decide)
theorem get?_range' (s step) : ∀ {m n : Nat}, m < n → get? (range' s n step) m = some (s + step * m)
| 0, n + 1, _ => rfl
| m + 1, n + 1, h =>
(get?_range' (s + step) step (Nat.lt_of_add_lt_add_right h)).trans <| by
simp [Nat.mul_succ, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem get_range' {n m step} (i) (H : i < (range' n m step).length) :
get (range' n m step) ⟨i, H⟩ = n + step * i :=
(get?_eq_some.1 <| get?_range' n step (by simpa using H)).2
theorem range'_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) step = range' s n step ++ [s + step * n] := by
rw [Nat.add_comm n 1]; exact (range'_append s n 1 step).symm
theorem range'_1_concat (s n : Nat) : range' s (n + 1) = range' s n ++ [s + n] := by
simp [range'_concat]
theorem range_loop_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, range.loop s (range' s n) = range' 0 (n + s)
| 0, n => rfl
| s + 1, n => by rw [← Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_right_comm n s 1]; exact range_loop_range' s (n + 1)
theorem range_eq_range' (n : Nat) : range n = range' 0 n :=
(range_loop_range' n 0).trans <| by rw [Nat.zero_add]
theorem range_succ_eq_map (n : Nat) : range (n + 1) = 0 :: map succ (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', range_eq_range', range', Nat.add_comm, ← map_add_range']
congr; exact funext one_add
theorem range'_eq_map_range (s n : Nat) : range' s n = map (s + ·) (range n) := by
rw [range_eq_range', map_add_range']; rfl
@[simp] theorem length_range (n : Nat) : length (range n) = n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', length_range']
@[simp] theorem range_eq_nil {n : Nat} : range n = [] ↔ n = 0 := by
rw [← length_eq_zero, length_range]
@[simp]
theorem range_sublist {m n : Nat} : range m <+ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_sublist_right]
@[simp]
theorem range_subset {m n : Nat} : range m ⊆ range n ↔ m ≤ n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_subset_right, lt_succ_self]
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {m n : Nat} : m ∈ range n ↔ m < n := by
simp only [range_eq_range', mem_range'_1, Nat.zero_le, true_and, Nat.zero_add]
theorem not_mem_range_self {n : Nat} : n ∉ range n := by simp
theorem self_mem_range_succ (n : Nat) : n ∈ range (n + 1) := by simp
theorem get?_range {m n : Nat} (h : m < n) : get? (range n) m = some m := by
simp [range_eq_range', get?_range' _ _ h]
theorem range_succ (n : Nat) : range (succ n) = range n ++ [n] := by
simp only [range_eq_range', range'_1_concat, Nat.zero_add]
@[simp] theorem range_zero : range 0 = [] := rfl
theorem range_add (a b : Nat) : range (a + b) = range a ++ (range b).map (a + ·) := by
rw [← range'_eq_map_range]
simpa [range_eq_range', Nat.add_comm] using (range'_append_1 0 a b).symm
theorem iota_eq_reverse_range' : ∀ n : Nat, iota n = reverse (range' 1 n)
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by simp [iota, range'_concat, iota_eq_reverse_range' n, reverse_append, Nat.add_comm]
@[simp] theorem length_iota (n : Nat) : length (iota n) = n := by simp [iota_eq_reverse_range']
@[simp]
theorem mem_iota {m n : Nat} : m ∈ iota n ↔ 1 ≤ m ∧ m ≤ n := by
simp [iota_eq_reverse_range', Nat.add_comm, Nat.lt_succ]
theorem reverse_range' : ∀ s n : Nat, reverse (range' s n) = map (s + n - 1 - ·) (range n)
| s, 0 => rfl
| s, n + 1 => by
rw [range'_1_concat, reverse_append, range_succ_eq_map,
show s + (n + 1) - 1 = s + n from rfl, map, map_map]
simp [reverse_range', Nat.sub_right_comm]; rfl
@[simp] theorem get_range {n} (i) (H : i < (range n).length) : get (range n) ⟨i, H⟩ = i :=
Option.some.inj <| by rw [← get?_eq_get _, get?_range (by simpa using H)]
/-! ### enum, enumFrom -/
@[simp] theorem enumFrom_map_fst (n) :
∀ (l : List α), map Prod.fst (enumFrom n l) = range' n l.length
| [] => rfl
| _ :: _ => congrArg (cons _) (enumFrom_map_fst _ _)
@[simp] theorem enum_map_fst (l : List α) : map Prod.fst (enum l) = range l.length := by
simp only [enum, enumFrom_map_fst, range_eq_range']
/-! ### maximum? -/
-- A specialization of `maximum?_eq_some_iff` to Nat.
theorem maximum?_eq_some_iff' {xs : List Nat} :
xs.maximum? = some a ↔ (a ∈ xs ∧ ∀ b ∈ xs, b ≤ a) :=
maximum?_eq_some_iff
(le_refl := Nat.le_refl)
(max_eq_or := fun _ _ => Nat.max_def .. ▸ by split <;> simp)
(max_le_iff := fun _ _ _ => Nat.max_le)
/-! ### indexOf and indexesOf -/
theorem foldrIdx_start :
(xs : List α).foldrIdx f i s = (xs : List α).foldrIdx (fun i => f (i + s)) i := by
induction xs generalizing f i s with
| nil => rfl
| cons h t ih =>
dsimp [foldrIdx]
simp only [@ih f]
simp only [@ih (fun i => f (i + s))]
simp [Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_comm 1 s]
@[simp] theorem foldrIdx_cons :
(x :: xs : List α).foldrIdx f i s = f s x (foldrIdx f i xs (s + 1)) := rfl
theorem findIdxs_cons_aux (p : α → Bool) :
foldrIdx (fun i a is => if p a = true then (i + 1) :: is else is) [] xs s =
map (· + 1) (foldrIdx (fun i a is => if p a = true then i :: is else is) [] xs s) := by
induction xs generalizing s with
| nil => rfl
| cons x xs ih =>
simp only [foldrIdx]
split <;> simp [ih]
theorem findIdxs_cons :
(x :: xs : List α).findIdxs p =
bif p x then 0 :: (xs.findIdxs p).map (· + 1) else (xs.findIdxs p).map (· + 1) := by
dsimp [findIdxs]
rw [cond_eq_if]
split <;>
· simp only [Nat.zero_add, foldrIdx_start, Nat.add_zero, cons.injEq, true_and]
apply findIdxs_cons_aux
@[simp] theorem indexesOf_nil [BEq α] : ([] : List α).indexesOf x = [] := rfl
theorem indexesOf_cons [BEq α] : (x :: xs : List α).indexesOf y =
bif x == y then 0 :: (xs.indexesOf y).map (· + 1) else (xs.indexesOf y).map (· + 1) := by
simp [indexesOf, findIdxs_cons]
@[simp] theorem indexOf_nil [BEq α] : ([] : List α).indexOf x = 0 := rfl
theorem indexOf_cons [BEq α] :
(x :: xs : List α).indexOf y = bif x == y then 0 else xs.indexOf y + 1 := by
dsimp [indexOf]
simp [findIdx_cons]
theorem indexOf_mem_indexesOf [BEq α] [LawfulBEq α] {xs : List α} (m : x ∈ xs) :
xs.indexOf x ∈ xs.indexesOf x := by
induction xs with
| nil => simp_all
| cons h t ih =>
simp [indexOf_cons, indexesOf_cons, cond_eq_if]
split <;> rename_i w
· apply mem_cons_self
· cases m
case _ => simp_all
case tail m =>
specialize ih m
simpa
theorem merge_loop_nil_left (s : α → α → Bool) (r t) :
merge.loop s [] r t = reverseAux t r := by
rw [merge.loop]
theorem merge_loop_nil_right (s : α → α → Bool) (l t) :
merge.loop s l [] t = reverseAux t l := by
cases l <;> rw [merge.loop]; intro; contradiction
theorem merge_loop (s : α → α → Bool) (l r t) :
merge.loop s l r t = reverseAux t (merge s l r) := by
rw [merge]; generalize hn : l.length + r.length = n
induction n using Nat.recAux generalizing l r t with
| zero =>
rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_left hn)]
rw [eq_nil_of_length_eq_zero (Nat.eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero_right hn)]
simp only [merge.loop, reverseAux]
| succ n ih =>
match l, r with
| [], r => simp only [merge_loop_nil_left]; rfl
| l, [] => simp only [merge_loop_nil_right]; rfl
| a::l, b::r =>
simp only [merge.loop, cond]
split
· have hn : l.length + (b :: r).length = n := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m:=1)
rw [←hn]; simp only [length_cons, Nat.add_succ, Nat.succ_add]
rw [ih _ _ (a::t) hn, ih _ _ [] hn, ih _ _ [a] hn]; rfl
· have hn : (a::l).length + r.length = n := by
apply Nat.add_right_cancel (m:=1)
rw [←hn]; simp only [length_cons, Nat.add_succ, Nat.succ_add]
rw [ih _ _ (b::t) hn, ih _ _ [] hn, ih _ _ [b] hn]; rfl
@[simp] theorem merge_nil (s : α → α → Bool) (l) : merge s l [] = l := merge_loop_nil_right ..
@[simp] theorem nil_merge (s : α → α → Bool) (r) : merge s [] r = r := merge_loop_nil_left ..
theorem cons_merge_cons (s : α → α → Bool) (a b l r) :
merge s (a::l) (b::r) = if s a b then a :: merge s l (b::r) else b :: merge s (a::l) r := by
simp only [merge, merge.loop, cond]; split <;> (next hs => rw [hs, merge_loop]; rfl)
@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_pos (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : s a b) :
merge s (a::l) (b::r) = a :: merge s l (b::r) := by
rw [cons_merge_cons, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem cons_merge_cons_neg (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) (h : ¬ s a b) :
merge s (a::l) (b::r) = b :: merge s (a::l) r := by
rw [cons_merge_cons, if_neg h]
@[simp] theorem length_merge (s : α → α → Bool) (l r) :
(merge s l r).length = l.length + r.length := by
match l, r with
| [], r => simp
| l, [] => simp
| a::l, b::r =>
rw [cons_merge_cons]
split
· simp_arith [length_merge s l (b::r)]
· simp_arith [length_merge s (a::l) r]
@[simp]
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/List/Lemmas.lean | 1,558 | 1,566 | theorem mem_merge {s : α → α → Bool} : x ∈ merge s l r ↔ x ∈ l ∨ x ∈ r := by |
match l, r with
| l, [] => simp
| [], l => simp
| a::l, b::r =>
rw [cons_merge_cons]
split
· simp [mem_merge (l := l) (r := b::r), or_assoc]
· simp [mem_merge (l := a::l) (r := r), or_assoc, or_left_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov, Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
/-!
# Simple graphs
This module defines simple graphs on a vertex type `V` as an irreflexive symmetric relation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph` is a structure for symmetric, irreflexive relations
* `SimpleGraph.neighborSet` is the `Set` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex
* `SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors` is the intersection of the neighbor sets of two given vertices
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceSet` is the `Set` of edges containing a given vertex
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` instance: Under the subgraph relation, `SimpleGraph` forms a
`CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`. In other words, this is the complete lattice of spanning subgraphs
of the complete graph.
## Todo
* This is the simplest notion of an unoriented graph. This should
eventually fit into a more complete combinatorics hierarchy which
includes multigraphs and directed graphs. We begin with simple graphs
in order to start learning what the combinatorics hierarchy should
look like.
-/
-- Porting note: using `aesop` for automation
-- Porting note: These attributes are needed to use `aesop` as a replacement for `obviously`
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Symmetric
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Irreflexive
-- Porting note: a thin wrapper around `aesop` for graph lemmas, modelled on `aesop_cat`
/--
A variant of the `aesop` tactic for use in the graph library. Changes relative
to standard `aesop`:
- We use the `SimpleGraph` rule set in addition to the default rule sets.
- We instruct Aesop's `intro` rule to unfold with `default` transparency.
- We instruct Aesop to fail if it can't fully solve the goal. This allows us to
use `aesop_graph` for auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph) "aesop_graph" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
Use `aesop_graph?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_graph`
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph?) "aesop_graph?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_graph` which does not fail if it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal Aesop is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph_nonterminal) "aesop_graph_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
open Finset Function
universe u v w
/-- A simple graph is an irreflexive symmetric relation `Adj` on a vertex type `V`.
The relation describes which pairs of vertices are adjacent.
There is exactly one edge for every pair of adjacent vertices;
see `SimpleGraph.edgeSet` for the corresponding edge set.
-/
@[ext, aesop safe constructors (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])]
structure SimpleGraph (V : Type u) where
/-- The adjacency relation of a simple graph. -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph
loopless : Irreflexive Adj := by aesop_graph
#align simple_graph SimpleGraph
-- Porting note: changed `obviously` to `aesop` in the `structure`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph (Adj → adj)
/-- Constructor for simple graphs using a symmetric irreflexive boolean function. -/
@[simps]
def SimpleGraph.mk' {V : Type u} :
{adj : V → V → Bool // (∀ x y, adj x y = adj y x) ∧ (∀ x, ¬ adj x x)} ↪ SimpleGraph V where
toFun x := ⟨fun v w ↦ x.1 v w, fun v w ↦ by simp [x.2.1], fun v ↦ by simp [x.2.2]⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨adj, _⟩ ⟨adj', _⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
intro h
funext v w
simpa [Bool.coe_iff_coe] using congr_fun₂ h v w
/-- We can enumerate simple graphs by enumerating all functions `V → V → Bool`
and filtering on whether they are symmetric and irreflexive. -/
instance {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (SimpleGraph V) where
elems := Finset.univ.map SimpleGraph.mk'
complete := by
classical
rintro ⟨Adj, hs, hi⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_univ, true_and, Subtype.exists, Bool.not_eq_true]
refine ⟨fun v w ↦ Adj v w, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp [hs.iff]
· intro v; simp [hi v]
· ext
simp
/-- Construct the simple graph induced by the given relation. It
symmetrizes the relation and makes it irreflexive. -/
def SimpleGraph.fromRel {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj a b := a ≠ b ∧ (r a b ∨ r b a)
symm := fun _ _ ⟨hn, hr⟩ => ⟨hn.symm, hr.symm⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn rfl
#align simple_graph.from_rel SimpleGraph.fromRel
@[simp]
theorem SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) (v w : V) :
(SimpleGraph.fromRel r).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ (r v w ∨ r w v) :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.from_rel_adj SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj
-- Porting note: attributes needed for `completeGraph`
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.symm
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.irrefl
/-- The complete graph on a type `V` is the simple graph with all pairs of distinct vertices
adjacent. In `Mathlib`, this is usually referred to as `⊤`. -/
def completeGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj := Ne
#align complete_graph completeGraph
/-- The graph with no edges on a given vertex type `V`. `Mathlib` prefers the notation `⊥`. -/
def emptyGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj _ _ := False
#align empty_graph emptyGraph
/-- Two vertices are adjacent in the complete bipartite graph on two vertex types
if and only if they are not from the same side.
Any bipartite graph may be regarded as a subgraph of one of these. -/
@[simps]
def completeBipartiteGraph (V W : Type*) : SimpleGraph (Sum V W) where
Adj v w := v.isLeft ∧ w.isRight ∨ v.isRight ∧ w.isLeft
symm v w := by cases v <;> cases w <;> simp
loopless v := by cases v <;> simp
#align complete_bipartite_graph completeBipartiteGraph
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {a b c u v w : V} {e : Sym2 V}
@[simp]
protected theorem irrefl {v : V} : ¬G.Adj v v :=
G.loopless v
#align simple_graph.irrefl SimpleGraph.irrefl
theorem adj_comm (u v : V) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj v u :=
⟨fun x => G.symm x, fun x => G.symm x⟩
#align simple_graph.adj_comm SimpleGraph.adj_comm
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
#align simple_graph.adj_symm SimpleGraph.adj_symm
theorem Adj.symm {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
#align simple_graph.adj.symm SimpleGraph.Adj.symm
theorem ne_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b := by
rintro rfl
exact G.irrefl h
#align simple_graph.ne_of_adj SimpleGraph.ne_of_adj
protected theorem Adj.ne {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b :=
G.ne_of_adj h
#align simple_graph.adj.ne SimpleGraph.Adj.ne
protected theorem Adj.ne' {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : b ≠ a :=
h.ne.symm
#align simple_graph.adj.ne' SimpleGraph.Adj.ne'
theorem ne_of_adj_of_not_adj {v w x : V} (h : G.Adj v x) (hn : ¬G.Adj w x) : v ≠ w := fun h' =>
hn (h' ▸ h)
#align simple_graph.ne_of_adj_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.ne_of_adj_of_not_adj
theorem adj_injective : Injective (Adj : SimpleGraph V → V → V → Prop) :=
SimpleGraph.ext
#align simple_graph.adj_injective SimpleGraph.adj_injective
@[simp]
theorem adj_inj {G H : SimpleGraph V} : G.Adj = H.Adj ↔ G = H :=
adj_injective.eq_iff
#align simple_graph.adj_inj SimpleGraph.adj_inj
section Order
/-- The relation that one `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another.
Note that this should be spelled `≤`. -/
def IsSubgraph (x y : SimpleGraph V) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.is_subgraph SimpleGraph.IsSubgraph
instance : LE (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨IsSubgraph⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSubgraph_eq_le : (IsSubgraph : SimpleGraph V → SimpleGraph V → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.is_subgraph_eq_le SimpleGraph.isSubgraph_eq_le
/-- The supremum of two graphs `x ⊔ y` has edges where either `x` or `y` have edges. -/
instance : Sup (SimpleGraph V) where
sup x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊔ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.sup_apply, Pi.sup_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊔ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∨ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.sup_adj SimpleGraph.sup_adj
/-- The infimum of two graphs `x ⊓ y` has edges where both `x` and `y` have edges. -/
instance : Inf (SimpleGraph V) where
inf x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊓ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.inf_apply, Pi.inf_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊓ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.inf_adj SimpleGraph.inf_adj
/-- We define `Gᶜ` to be the `SimpleGraph V` such that no two adjacent vertices in `G`
are adjacent in the complement, and every nonadjacent pair of vertices is adjacent
(still ensuring that vertices are not adjacent to themselves). -/
instance hasCompl : HasCompl (SimpleGraph V) where
compl G :=
{ Adj := fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
symm := fun v w ⟨hne, _⟩ => ⟨hne.symm, by rwa [adj_comm]⟩
loopless := fun v ⟨hne, _⟩ => (hne rfl).elim }
@[simp]
theorem compl_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : Gᶜ.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.compl_adj SimpleGraph.compl_adj
/-- The difference of two graphs `x \ y` has the edges of `x` with the edges of `y` removed. -/
instance sdiff : SDiff (SimpleGraph V) where
sdiff x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj \ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by change x.Adj w v ∧ ¬y.Adj w v; rwa [x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x \ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ ¬y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.sdiff_adj SimpleGraph.sdiff_adj
instance supSet : SupSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sSup s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b
symm := fun a b => Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right Adj.symm
loopless := by
rintro a ⟨G, _, ha⟩
exact ha.ne rfl }
instance infSet : InfSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sInf s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G⦄, G ∈ s → Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) Ne.symm
loopless := fun _ h => h.2 rfl }
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} {a b : V} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.Sup_adj SimpleGraph.sSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.Inf_adj SimpleGraph.sInf_adj
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.supr_adj SimpleGraph.iSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.infi_adj SimpleGraph.iInf_adj
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G, hG⟩ := hs
exact fun h => (h _ hG).ne
#align simple_graph.Inf_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.sInf_adj_of_nonempty
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _), Set.forall_mem_range]
#align simple_graph.infi_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.iInf_adj_of_nonempty
/-- For graphs `G`, `H`, `G ≤ H` iff `∀ a b, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ show DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) from
adj_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun G H => ∀ ⦃a b⦄, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b }
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ SimpleGraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
compl := HasCompl.compl
sdiff := (· \ ·)
top := completeGraph V
bot := emptyGraph V
le_top := fun x v w h => x.ne_of_adj h
bot_le := fun x v w h => h.elim
sdiff_eq := fun x y => by
ext v w
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, ⟨?_, h.2⟩⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩⟩
rintro rfl
exact x.irrefl h.1
inf_compl_le_bot := fun G v w h => False.elim <| h.2.2 h.1
top_le_sup_compl := fun G v w hvw => by
by_cases h : G.Adj v w
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨hvw, h⟩
sSup := sSup
le_sSup := fun s G hG a b hab => ⟨G, hG, hab⟩
sSup_le := fun s G hG a b => by
rintro ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact hG _ hH hab
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun s G hG a b hab => hab.1 hG
le_sInf := fun s G hG a b hab => ⟨fun H hH => hG _ hH hab, hab.ne⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => by ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
@[simp]
theorem top_adj (v w : V) : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.top_adj SimpleGraph.top_adj
@[simp]
theorem bot_adj (v w : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.bot_adj SimpleGraph.bot_adj
@[simp]
theorem completeGraph_eq_top (V : Type u) : completeGraph V = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.complete_graph_eq_top SimpleGraph.completeGraph_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem emptyGraph_eq_bot (V : Type u) : emptyGraph V = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.empty_graph_eq_bot SimpleGraph.emptyGraph_eq_bot
@[simps]
instance (V : Type u) : Inhabited (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance [Subsingleton V] : Unique (SimpleGraph V) where
default := ⊥
uniq G := by ext a b; have := Subsingleton.elim a b; simp [this]
instance [Nontrivial V] : Nontrivial (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, fun h ↦ not_subsingleton V ⟨by simpa only [← adj_inj, Function.funext_iff, bot_adj,
top_adj, ne_eq, eq_iff_iff, false_iff, not_not] using h⟩⟩⟩
section Decidable
variable (V) (H : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
instance Bot.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun _ _ => False
#align simple_graph.bot.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Bot.adjDecidable
instance Sup.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊔ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∨ H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.sup.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Sup.adjDecidable
instance Inf.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊓ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.inf.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Inf.adjDecidable
instance Sdiff.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G \ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ ¬H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.sdiff.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Sdiff.adjDecidable
variable [DecidableEq V]
instance Top.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w
#align simple_graph.top.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Top.adjDecidable
instance Compl.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (Gᶜ.Adj) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.compl.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Compl.adjDecidable
end Decidable
end Order
/-- `G.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in `G`. -/
def support : Set V :=
Rel.dom G.Adj
#align simple_graph.support SimpleGraph.support
theorem mem_support {v : V} : v ∈ G.support ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_support SimpleGraph.mem_support
theorem support_mono {G G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') : G.support ⊆ G'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h
#align simple_graph.support_mono SimpleGraph.support_mono
/-- `G.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G`. -/
def neighborSet (v : V) : Set V := {w | G.Adj v w}
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set SimpleGraph.neighborSet
instance neighborSet.memDecidable (v : V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.neighborSet v) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred (Adj G v)
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set.mem_decidable SimpleGraph.neighborSet.memDecidable
section EdgeSet
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V}
/-- The edges of G consist of the unordered pairs of vertices related by
`G.Adj`. This is the order embedding; for the edge set of a particular graph, see
`SimpleGraph.edgeSet`.
The way `edgeSet` is defined is such that `mem_edgeSet` is proved by `Iff.rfl`.
(That is, `s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet` is definitionally equal to `G.Adj v w`.)
-/
-- Porting note: We need a separate definition so that dot notation works.
def edgeSetEmbedding (V : Type*) : SimpleGraph V ↪o Set (Sym2 V) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun G => Sym2.fromRel G.symm) fun _ _ =>
⟨fun h a b => @h s(a, b), fun h e => Sym2.ind @h e⟩
/-- `G.edgeSet` is the edge set for `G`.
This is an abbreviation for `edgeSetEmbedding G` that permits dot notation. -/
abbrev edgeSet (G : SimpleGraph V) : Set (Sym2 V) := edgeSetEmbedding V G
#align simple_graph.edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSetEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem mem_edgeSet : s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.mem_edgeSet
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet : e ∈ edgeSet G → ¬e.IsDiag :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => Adj.ne) e
#align simple_graph.not_is_diag_of_mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_inj : G₁.edgeSet = G₂.edgeSet ↔ G₁ = G₂ := (edgeSetEmbedding V).eq_iff_eq
#align simple_graph.edge_set_inj SimpleGraph.edgeSet_inj
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊆ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).le_iff_le
#align simple_graph.edge_set_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_subset_edgeSet
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊂ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ < G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).lt_iff_lt
#align simple_graph.edge_set_ssubset_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_injective : Injective (edgeSet : SimpleGraph V → Set (Sym2 V)) :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).injective
#align simple_graph.edge_set_injective SimpleGraph.edgeSet_injective
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_mono⟩ := edgeSet_subset_edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_set_mono SimpleGraph.edgeSet_mono
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_strict_mono⟩ := edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_set_strict_mono SimpleGraph.edgeSet_strict_mono
attribute [mono] edgeSet_mono edgeSet_strict_mono
variable (G₁ G₂)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
#align simple_graph.edge_set_bot SimpleGraph.edgeSet_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
Sym2.fromRel_ne
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_setOf_not_isDiag : G.edgeSet ⊆ {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
fun _ h => (Sym2.fromRel_irreflexive (sym := G.symm)).mp G.loopless h
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∪ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∩ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.edgeSet_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff : (G₁ \ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet \ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sdiff
variable {G G₁ G₂}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_edgeSet : Disjoint G₁.edgeSet G₂.edgeSet ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← edgeSet_inf, ← edgeSet_bot, ← Set.le_iff_subset,
OrderEmbedding.le_iff_le]
#align simple_graph.disjoint_edge_set SimpleGraph.disjoint_edgeSet
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_eq_empty : G.edgeSet = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by rw [← edgeSet_bot, edgeSet_inj]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_eq_empty SimpleGraph.edgeSet_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_nonempty : G.edgeSet.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeSet_eq_empty.ne]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_nonempty SimpleGraph.edgeSet_nonempty
/-- This lemma, combined with `edgeSet_sdiff` and `edgeSet_from_edgeSet`,
allows proving `(G \ from_edgeSet s).edge_set = G.edgeSet \ s` by `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff_sdiff_isDiag (G : SimpleGraph V) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
G.edgeSet \ (s \ { e | e.IsDiag }) = G.edgeSet \ s := by
ext e
simp only [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_and, not_not, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp only [G.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet h, imp_false]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sdiff_sdiff_is_diag SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sdiff_sdiff_isDiag
/-- Two vertices are adjacent iff there is an edge between them. The
condition `v ≠ w` ensures they are different endpoints of the edge,
which is necessary since when `v = w` the existential
`∃ (e ∈ G.edgeSet), v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e` is satisfied by every edge
incident to `v`. -/
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge {v w : V} : G.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ∃ e ∈ G.edgeSet, v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e := by
refine ⟨fun _ => ⟨G.ne_of_adj ‹_›, s(v, w), by simpa⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hne, e, he, hv⟩
rw [Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff hne] at hv
subst e
rwa [mem_edgeSet] at he
#align simple_graph.adj_iff_exists_edge SimpleGraph.adj_iff_exists_edge
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge_coe : G.Adj a b ↔ ∃ e : G.edgeSet, e.val = s(a, b) := by
simp only [mem_edgeSet, exists_prop, SetCoe.exists, exists_eq_right, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align simple_graph.adj_iff_exists_edge_coe SimpleGraph.adj_iff_exists_edge_coe
variable (G G₁ G₂)
theorem edge_other_ne {e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ G.edgeSet) {v : V} (h : v ∈ e) :
Sym2.Mem.other h ≠ v := by
erw [← Sym2.other_spec h, Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact G.ne_of_adj he
#align simple_graph.edge_other_ne SimpleGraph.edge_other_ne
instance decidableMemEdgeSet [DecidableRel G.Adj] : DecidablePred (· ∈ G.edgeSet) :=
Sym2.fromRel.decidablePred G.symm
#align simple_graph.decidable_mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.decidableMemEdgeSet
instance fintypeEdgeSet [Fintype (Sym2 V)] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.edgeSet :=
Subtype.fintype _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSet
instance fintypeEdgeSetBot : Fintype (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_bot]
infer_instance
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_bot SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetBot
instance fintypeEdgeSetSup [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_sup]
infer_instance
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetSup
instance fintypeEdgeSetInf [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_inf]
exact Set.fintypeInter _ _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetInf
instance fintypeEdgeSetSdiff [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ \ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_sdiff]
exact Set.fintypeDiff _ _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetSdiff
end EdgeSet
section FromEdgeSet
variable (s : Set (Sym2 V))
/-- `fromEdgeSet` constructs a `SimpleGraph` from a set of edges, without loops. -/
def fromEdgeSet : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := Sym2.ToRel s ⊓ Ne
symm v w h := ⟨Sym2.toRel_symmetric s h.1, h.2.symm⟩
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_adj : (fromEdgeSet s).Adj v w ↔ s(v, w) ∈ s ∧ v ≠ w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_adj SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_adj
-- Note: we need to make sure `fromEdgeSet_adj` and this lemma are confluent.
-- In particular, both yield `s(u, v) ∈ (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet` ==> `s(v, w) ∈ s ∧ v ≠ w`.
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_fromEdgeSet : (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet = s \ { e | e.IsDiag } := by
ext e
exact Sym2.ind (by simp) e
#align simple_graph.edge_set_from_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_fromEdgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_edgeSet : fromEdgeSet G.edgeSet = G := by
ext v w
exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h, G.ne_of_adj h⟩⟩
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_edge_set SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_edgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_empty : fromEdgeSet (∅ : Set (Sym2 V)) = ⊥ := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, false_and_iff, bot_adj]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_empty SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_univ : fromEdgeSet (Set.univ : Set (Sym2 V)) = ⊤ := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff, top_adj]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_univ SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_univ
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_inter (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s ∩ t) = fromEdgeSet s ⊓ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_inter_iff, Ne, inf_adj]
tauto
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_union (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s ∪ t) = fromEdgeSet s ⊔ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
simp [Set.mem_union, or_and_right]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_union
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_sdiff (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s \ t) = fromEdgeSet s \ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_sdiff
@[mono]
theorem fromEdgeSet_mono {s t : Set (Sym2 V)} (h : s ⊆ t) : fromEdgeSet s ≤ fromEdgeSet t := by
rintro v w
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Ne, not_false_iff,
and_true_iff, and_imp]
exact fun vws _ => h vws
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_mono SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_mono
@[simp] lemma disjoint_fromEdgeSet : Disjoint G (fromEdgeSet s) ↔ Disjoint G.edgeSet s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Set.diff_union_inter s {e : Sym2 V | e.IsDiag}]
rw [← disjoint_edgeSet, edgeSet_fromEdgeSet, Set.disjoint_union_right, and_iff_left]
exact Set.disjoint_left.2 fun e he he' ↦ not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ he he'.2
#align simple_graph.disjoint_from_edge_set SimpleGraph.disjoint_fromEdgeSet
@[simp] lemma fromEdgeSet_disjoint : Disjoint (fromEdgeSet s) G ↔ Disjoint s G.edgeSet := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_fromEdgeSet, disjoint_comm]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_disjoint SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_disjoint
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype s] : Fintype (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_fromEdgeSet s]
infer_instance
end FromEdgeSet
/-! ### Incidence set -/
/-- Set of edges incident to a given vertex, aka incidence set. -/
def incidenceSet (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) :=
{ e ∈ G.edgeSet | v ∈ e }
#align simple_graph.incidence_set SimpleGraph.incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset (v : V) : G.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.edgeSet := fun _ h => h.1
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_subset
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff : s(b, c) ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ G.Adj b c ∧ (a = b ∨ a = c) :=
and_congr_right' Sym2.mem_iff
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff : s(a, b) ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ G.Adj a b :=
and_iff_left <| Sym2.mem_mk_left _ _
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_left_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff : s(a, b) ∈ G.incidenceSet b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
and_iff_left <| Sym2.mem_mk_right _ _
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_right_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff
theorem edge_mem_incidenceSet_iff {e : G.edgeSet} : ↑e ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ a ∈ (e : Sym2 V) :=
and_iff_right e.2
#align simple_graph.edge_mem_incidence_set_iff SimpleGraph.edge_mem_incidenceSet_iff
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset (h : a ≠ b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b ⊆ {s(a, b)} := fun _e he =>
(Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff h).1 ⟨he.1.2, he.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b = {s(a, b)} := by
refine (G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset <| h.ne).antisymm ?_
rintro _ (rfl : _ = s(a, b))
exact ⟨G.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff.2 h, G.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff.2 h⟩
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_of_adj SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_adj
theorem adj_of_mem_incidenceSet (h : a ≠ b) (ha : e ∈ G.incidenceSet a)
(hb : e ∈ G.incidenceSet b) : G.Adj a b := by
rwa [← mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff, ←
Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 <| G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset h ⟨ha, hb⟩]
#align simple_graph.adj_of_mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.adj_of_mem_incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj (h : ¬G.Adj a b) (hn : a ≠ b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b = ∅ := by
simp_rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, Set.mem_inter_iff, not_and]
intro u ha hb
exact h (G.adj_of_mem_incidenceSet hn ha hb)
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj
instance decidableMemIncidenceSet [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.incidenceSet v) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun e => e ∈ G.edgeSet ∧ v ∈ e
#align simple_graph.decidable_mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.decidableMemIncidenceSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (v w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborSet v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.mem_neighborSet
lemma not_mem_neighborSet_self : a ∉ G.neighborSet a := by simp
#align simple_graph.not_mem_neighbor_set_self SimpleGraph.not_mem_neighborSet_self
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceSet (v w : V) : s(v, w) ∈ G.incidenceSet v ↔ G.Adj v w := by
simp [incidenceSet]
#align simple_graph.mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.mem_incidenceSet
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Basic.lean | 777 | 779 | theorem mem_incidence_iff_neighbor {v w : V} :
s(v, w) ∈ G.incidenceSet v ↔ w ∈ G.neighborSet v := by |
simp only [mem_incidenceSet, mem_neighborSet]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.AEMeasurable
#align_import measure_theory.group.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a75898643b2d774cced9ae7c0b28c21663b99666"
/-!
# Typeclasses for measurability of operations
In this file we define classes `MeasurableMul` etc and prove dot-style lemmas
(`Measurable.mul`, `AEMeasurable.mul` etc). For binary operations we define two typeclasses:
- `MeasurableMul` says that both left and right multiplication are measurable;
- `MeasurableMul₂` says that `fun p : α × α => p.1 * p.2` is measurable,
and similarly for other binary operations. The reason for introducing these classes is that in case
of topological space `α` equipped with the Borel `σ`-algebra, instances for `MeasurableMul₂`
etc require `α` to have a second countable topology.
We define separate classes for `MeasurableDiv`/`MeasurableSub`
because on some types (e.g., `ℕ`, `ℝ≥0∞`) division and/or subtraction are not defined as `a * b⁻¹` /
`a + (-b)`.
For instances relating, e.g., `ContinuousMul` to `MeasurableMul` see file
`MeasureTheory.BorelSpace`.
## Implementation notes
For the heuristics of `@[to_additive]` it is important that the type with a multiplication
(or another multiplicative operations) is the first (implicit) argument of all declarations.
## Tags
measurable function, arithmetic operator
## Todo
* Uniformize the treatment of `pow` and `smul`.
* Use `@[to_additive]` to send `MeasurablePow` to `MeasurableSMul₂`.
* This might require changing the definition (swapping the arguments in the function that is
in the conclusion of `MeasurableSMul`.)
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v
variable {α : Type*}
/-!
### Binary operations: `(· + ·)`, `(· * ·)`, `(· - ·)`, `(· / ·)`
-/
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableAdd` if `(· + c)` and `(· + c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (· + ·)` see `MeasurableAdd₂`. -/
class MeasurableAdd (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_const_add : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c + ·)
measurable_add_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· + c)
#align has_measurable_add MeasurableAdd
#align has_measurable_add.measurable_const_add MeasurableAdd.measurable_const_add
#align has_measurable_add.measurable_add_const MeasurableAdd.measurable_add_const
export MeasurableAdd (measurable_const_add measurable_add_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableAdd₂` if `uncurry (· + ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c + ·)` and `(· + c)` see `MeasurableAdd`. -/
class MeasurableAdd₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Add M] : Prop where
measurable_add : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 + p.2
#align has_measurable_add₂ MeasurableAdd₂
export MeasurableAdd₂ (measurable_add)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableMul` if `(c * ·)` and `(· * c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (*)` see `MeasurableMul₂`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableMul (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_const_mul : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c * ·)
measurable_mul_const : ∀ c : M, Measurable (· * c)
#align has_measurable_mul MeasurableMul
#align has_measurable_mul.measurable_const_mul MeasurableMul.measurable_const_mul
#align has_measurable_mul.measurable_mul_const MeasurableMul.measurable_mul_const
export MeasurableMul (measurable_const_mul measurable_mul_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableMul₂` if `uncurry (· * ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c * ·)` and `(· * c)` see `MeasurableMul`. -/
@[to_additive MeasurableAdd₂]
class MeasurableMul₂ (M : Type*) [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] : Prop where
measurable_mul : Measurable fun p : M × M => p.1 * p.2
#align has_measurable_mul₂ MeasurableMul₂
#align has_measurable_mul₂.measurable_mul MeasurableMul₂.measurable_mul
export MeasurableMul₂ (measurable_mul)
section Mul
variable {M α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [Mul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f g : α → M}
{μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_mul [MeasurableMul M] (hf : Measurable f) (c : M) :
Measurable fun x => c * f x :=
(measurable_const_mul c).comp hf
#align measurable.const_mul Measurable.const_mul
#align measurable.const_add Measurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_mul [MeasurableMul M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : M) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c * f x) μ :=
(MeasurableMul.measurable_const_mul c).comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.const_mul AEMeasurable.const_mul
#align ae_measurable.const_add AEMeasurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.mul_const [MeasurableMul M] (hf : Measurable f) (c : M) :
Measurable fun x => f x * c :=
(measurable_mul_const c).comp hf
#align measurable.mul_const Measurable.mul_const
#align measurable.add_const Measurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul_const [MeasurableMul M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : M) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x * c) μ :=
(measurable_mul_const c).comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.mul_const AEMeasurable.mul_const
#align ae_measurable.add_const AEMeasurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.mul' [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable (f * g) :=
measurable_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.mul' Measurable.mul'
#align measurable.add' Measurable.add'
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.mul [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => f a * g a :=
measurable_mul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.mul Measurable.mul
#align measurable.add Measurable.add
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul' [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (f * g) μ :=
measurable_mul.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.mul' AEMeasurable.mul'
#align ae_measurable.add' AEMeasurable.add'
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul [MeasurableMul₂ M] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun a => f a * g a) μ :=
measurable_mul.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.mul AEMeasurable.mul
#align ae_measurable.add AEMeasurable.add
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableMul₂.toMeasurableMul [MeasurableMul₂ M] :
MeasurableMul M :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_const.mul measurable_id, fun _ => measurable_id.mul measurable_const⟩
#align has_measurable_mul₂.to_has_measurable_mul MeasurableMul₂.toMeasurableMul
#align has_measurable_add₂.to_has_measurable_add MeasurableAdd₂.toMeasurableAdd
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableMul {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul (α i)] : MeasurableMul (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).const_mul _, fun _ =>
measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).mul_const _⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_mul Pi.measurableMul
#align pi.has_measurable_add Pi.measurableAdd
@[to_additive Pi.measurableAdd₂]
instance Pi.measurableMul₂ {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Mul (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableMul₂ (α i)] : MeasurableMul₂ (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun _ => measurable_fst.eval.mul measurable_snd.eval⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_mul₂ Pi.measurableMul₂
#align pi.has_measurable_add₂ Pi.measurableAdd₂
end Mul
/-- A version of `measurable_div_const` that assumes `MeasurableMul` instead of
`MeasurableDiv`. This can be nice to avoid unnecessary type-class assumptions. -/
@[to_additive " A version of `measurable_sub_const` that assumes `MeasurableAdd` instead of
`MeasurableSub`. This can be nice to avoid unnecessary type-class assumptions. "]
theorem measurable_div_const' {G : Type*} [DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableMul G]
(g : G) : Measurable fun h => h / g := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, measurable_mul_const]
#align measurable_div_const' measurable_div_const'
#align measurable_sub_const' measurable_sub_const'
/-- This class assumes that the map `β × γ → β` given by `(x, y) ↦ x ^ y` is measurable. -/
class MeasurablePow (β γ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [Pow β γ] : Prop where
measurable_pow : Measurable fun p : β × γ => p.1 ^ p.2
#align has_measurable_pow MeasurablePow
export MeasurablePow (measurable_pow)
/-- `Monoid.Pow` is measurable. -/
instance Monoid.measurablePow (M : Type*) [Monoid M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul₂ M] :
MeasurablePow M ℕ :=
⟨measurable_from_prod_countable fun n => by
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, pow_zero, ← Pi.one_def, measurable_one]
· simp only [pow_succ]
exact ih.mul measurable_id⟩
#align monoid.has_measurable_pow Monoid.measurablePow
section Pow
variable {β γ α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ] [Pow β γ] [MeasurablePow β γ]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem Measurable.pow (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) : Measurable fun x => f x ^ g x :=
measurable_pow.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.pow Measurable.pow
@[aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem AEMeasurable.pow (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x ^ g x) μ :=
measurable_pow.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.pow AEMeasurable.pow
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.pow_const (hf : Measurable f) (c : γ) : Measurable fun x => f x ^ c :=
hf.pow measurable_const
#align measurable.pow_const Measurable.pow_const
@[measurability]
theorem AEMeasurable.pow_const (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : γ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x ^ c) μ :=
hf.pow aemeasurable_const
#align ae_measurable.pow_const AEMeasurable.pow_const
@[measurability]
theorem Measurable.const_pow (hg : Measurable g) (c : β) : Measurable fun x => c ^ g x :=
measurable_const.pow hg
#align measurable.const_pow Measurable.const_pow
@[measurability]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_pow (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (c : β) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c ^ g x) μ :=
aemeasurable_const.pow hg
#align ae_measurable.const_pow AEMeasurable.const_pow
end Pow
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableSub` if `(c - ·)` and `(· - c)` are measurable
functions. For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (-)` see `MeasurableSub₂`. -/
class MeasurableSub (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G] [Sub G] : Prop where
measurable_const_sub : ∀ c : G, Measurable (c - ·)
measurable_sub_const : ∀ c : G, Measurable (· - c)
#align has_measurable_sub MeasurableSub
#align has_measurable_sub.measurable_const_sub MeasurableSub.measurable_const_sub
#align has_measurable_sub.measurable_sub_const MeasurableSub.measurable_sub_const
export MeasurableSub (measurable_const_sub measurable_sub_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableSub₂` if `uncurry (· - ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c - ·)` and `(· - c)` see `MeasurableSub`. -/
class MeasurableSub₂ (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G] [Sub G] : Prop where
measurable_sub : Measurable fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2
#align has_measurable_sub₂ MeasurableSub₂
#align has_measurable_sub₂.measurable_sub MeasurableSub₂.measurable_sub
export MeasurableSub₂ (measurable_sub)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableDiv` if `(c / ·)` and `(· / c)` are measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `uncurry (· / ·)` see `MeasurableDiv₂`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableDiv (G₀ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G₀] [Div G₀] : Prop where
measurable_const_div : ∀ c : G₀, Measurable (c / ·)
measurable_div_const : ∀ c : G₀, Measurable (· / c)
#align has_measurable_div MeasurableDiv
#align has_measurable_div.measurable_const_div MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const
#align has_measurable_div.measurable_div_const MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const
export MeasurableDiv (measurable_const_div measurable_div_const)
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableDiv₂` if `uncurry (· / ·)` is a measurable functions.
For a typeclass assuming measurability of `(c / ·)` and `(· / c)` see `MeasurableDiv`. -/
@[to_additive MeasurableSub₂]
class MeasurableDiv₂ (G₀ : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G₀] [Div G₀] : Prop where
measurable_div : Measurable fun p : G₀ × G₀ => p.1 / p.2
#align has_measurable_div₂ MeasurableDiv₂
#align has_measurable_div₂.measurable_div MeasurableDiv₂.measurable_div
export MeasurableDiv₂ (measurable_div)
section Div
variable {G α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [Div G] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {f g : α → G}
{μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_div [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : Measurable f) (c : G) :
Measurable fun x => c / f x :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_const_div c).comp hf
#align measurable.const_div Measurable.const_div
#align measurable.const_sub Measurable.const_sub
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_div [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : G) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c / f x) μ :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_const_div c).comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.const_div AEMeasurable.const_div
#align ae_measurable.const_sub AEMeasurable.const_sub
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.div_const [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : Measurable f) (c : G) :
Measurable fun x => f x / c :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const c).comp hf
#align measurable.div_const Measurable.div_const
#align measurable.sub_const Measurable.sub_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.div_const [MeasurableDiv G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (c : G) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x / c) μ :=
(MeasurableDiv.measurable_div_const c).comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.div_const AEMeasurable.div_const
#align ae_measurable.sub_const AEMeasurable.sub_const
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.div' [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable (f / g) :=
measurable_div.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.div' Measurable.div'
#align measurable.sub' Measurable.sub'
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.div [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun a => f a / g a :=
measurable_div.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.div Measurable.div
#align measurable.sub Measurable.sub
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.div' [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (f / g) μ :=
measurable_div.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.div' AEMeasurable.div'
#align ae_measurable.sub' AEMeasurable.sub'
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.div [MeasurableDiv₂ G] (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun a => f a / g a) μ :=
measurable_div.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.div AEMeasurable.div
#align ae_measurable.sub AEMeasurable.sub
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableDiv₂.toMeasurableDiv [MeasurableDiv₂ G] :
MeasurableDiv G :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_const.div measurable_id, fun _ => measurable_id.div measurable_const⟩
#align has_measurable_div₂.to_has_measurable_div MeasurableDiv₂.toMeasurableDiv
#align has_measurable_sub₂.to_has_measurable_sub MeasurableSub₂.toMeasurableSub
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableDiv {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Div (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableDiv (α i)] : MeasurableDiv (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).const_div _, fun _ =>
measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).div_const _⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_div Pi.measurableDiv
#align pi.has_measurable_sub Pi.measurableSub
@[to_additive Pi.measurableSub₂]
instance Pi.measurableDiv₂ {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Div (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableDiv₂ (α i)] : MeasurableDiv₂ (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun _ => measurable_fst.eval.div measurable_snd.eval⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_div₂ Pi.measurableDiv₂
#align pi.has_measurable_sub₂ Pi.measurableSub₂
@[measurability]
theorem measurableSet_eq_fun {m : MeasurableSpace α} {E} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E]
[MeasurableSingletonClass E] [MeasurableSub₂ E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } := by
suffices h_set_eq : { x : α | f x = g x } = { x | (f - g) x = (0 : E) } by
rw [h_set_eq]
exact (hf.sub hg) measurableSet_eq
ext
simp_rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero]
#align measurable_set_eq_fun measurableSet_eq_fun
@[measurability]
lemma measurableSet_eq_fun' {β : Type*} [CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid β] [Sub β] [OrderedSub β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSub₂ β] [MeasurableSingletonClass β]
{f g : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
MeasurableSet {x | f x = g x} := by
have : {a | f a = g a} = {a | (f - g) a = 0} ∩ {a | (g - f) a = 0} := by
ext
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Pi.sub_apply, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, Set.mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, h.symm.le⟩, fun h ↦ le_antisymm h.1 h.2⟩
rw [this]
exact ((hf.sub hg) (measurableSet_singleton 0)).inter ((hg.sub hf) (measurableSet_singleton 0))
theorem nullMeasurableSet_eq_fun {E} [MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E] [MeasurableSingletonClass E]
[MeasurableSub₂ E] {f g : α → E} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
NullMeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } μ := by
apply (measurableSet_eq_fun hf.measurable_mk hg.measurable_mk).nullMeasurableSet.congr
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk, hg.ae_eq_mk] with x hfx hgx
change (hf.mk f x = hg.mk g x) = (f x = g x)
simp only [hfx, hgx]
#align null_measurable_set_eq_fun nullMeasurableSet_eq_fun
theorem measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {E} [MeasurableSpace E]
[MeasurableSingletonClass E] [Countable E] {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable f)
(hg : Measurable g) : MeasurableSet { x | f x = g x } := by
have : { x | f x = g x } = ⋃ j, { x | f x = j } ∩ { x | g x = j } := by
ext1 x
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_inter_iff, exists_eq_right']
rw [this]
refine MeasurableSet.iUnion fun j => MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· exact hf (measurableSet_singleton j)
· exact hg (measurableSet_singleton j)
#align measurable_set_eq_fun_of_countable measurableSet_eq_fun_of_countable
theorem ae_eq_trim_of_measurable {α E} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[MeasurableSpace E] [AddGroup E] [MeasurableSingletonClass E] [MeasurableSub₂ E]
(hm : m ≤ m0) {f g : α → E} (hf : Measurable[m] f) (hg : Measurable[m] g) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] g := by
rwa [Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, trim_measurableSet_eq hm _]
exact @MeasurableSet.compl α _ m (@measurableSet_eq_fun α m E _ _ _ _ _ _ hf hg)
#align ae_eq_trim_of_measurable ae_eq_trim_of_measurable
end Div
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableNeg` if `x ↦ -x` is a measurable function. -/
class MeasurableNeg (G : Type*) [Neg G] [MeasurableSpace G] : Prop where
measurable_neg : Measurable (Neg.neg : G → G)
#align has_measurable_neg MeasurableNeg
#align has_measurable_neg.measurable_neg MeasurableNeg.measurable_neg
/-- We say that a type has `MeasurableInv` if `x ↦ x⁻¹` is a measurable function. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableInv (G : Type*) [Inv G] [MeasurableSpace G] : Prop where
measurable_inv : Measurable (Inv.inv : G → G)
#align has_measurable_inv MeasurableInv
#align has_measurable_inv.measurable_inv MeasurableInv.measurable_inv
export MeasurableInv (measurable_inv)
export MeasurableNeg (measurable_neg)
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) measurableDiv_of_mul_inv (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
[DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableMul G] [MeasurableInv G] : MeasurableDiv G where
measurable_const_div c := by
convert measurable_inv.const_mul c using 1
ext1
apply div_eq_mul_inv
measurable_div_const c := by
convert measurable_id.mul_const c⁻¹ using 1
ext1
apply div_eq_mul_inv
#align has_measurable_div_of_mul_inv measurableDiv_of_mul_inv
#align has_measurable_sub_of_add_neg measurableSub_of_add_neg
section Inv
variable {G α : Type*} [Inv G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{f : α → G} {μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.inv (hf : Measurable f) : Measurable fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
measurable_inv.comp hf
#align measurable.inv Measurable.inv
#align measurable.neg Measurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.inv (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ :=
measurable_inv.comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.inv AEMeasurable.inv
#align ae_measurable.neg AEMeasurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem measurable_inv_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G]
{f : α → G} : (Measurable fun x => (f x)⁻¹) ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
#align measurable_inv_iff measurable_inv_iff
#align measurable_neg_iff measurable_neg_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem aemeasurable_inv_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableInv G]
{f : α → G} : AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
#align ae_measurable_inv_iff aemeasurable_inv_iff
#align ae_measurable_neg_iff aemeasurable_neg_iff
@[simp]
theorem measurable_inv_iff₀ {G₀ : Type*} [GroupWithZero G₀] [MeasurableSpace G₀]
[MeasurableInv G₀] {f : α → G₀} : (Measurable fun x => (f x)⁻¹) ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
#align measurable_inv_iff₀ measurable_inv_iff₀
@[simp]
theorem aemeasurable_inv_iff₀ {G₀ : Type*} [GroupWithZero G₀] [MeasurableSpace G₀]
[MeasurableInv G₀] {f : α → G₀} : AEMeasurable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using h.inv, fun h => h.inv⟩
#align ae_measurable_inv_iff₀ aemeasurable_inv_iff₀
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableInv {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Inv (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableInv (α i)] : MeasurableInv (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).inv⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_inv Pi.measurableInv
#align pi.has_measurable_neg Pi.measurableNeg
@[to_additive]
theorem MeasurableSet.inv {s : Set G} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : MeasurableSet s⁻¹ :=
measurable_inv hs
#align measurable_set.inv MeasurableSet.inv
#align measurable_set.neg MeasurableSet.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measurableEmbedding_inv [InvolutiveInv α] [MeasurableInv α] :
MeasurableEmbedding (Inv.inv (α := α)) :=
⟨inv_injective, measurable_inv, fun s hs ↦ s.image_inv ▸ hs.inv⟩
end Inv
@[to_additive]
theorem Measurable.mul_iff_right {G : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [CommGroup G]
[MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] {f g : α → G} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable (f * g) ↔ Measurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul_iff_right {G : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [CommGroup G]
[MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → G} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable (f * g) μ ↔ AEMeasurable g μ :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Measurable.mul_iff_left {G : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [CommGroup G]
[MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] {f g : α → G} (hf : Measurable f) :
Measurable (g * f) ↔ Measurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ Measurable.mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive]
theorem AEMeasurable.mul_iff_left {G : Type*} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [CommGroup G]
[MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → G} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable (g * f) μ ↔ AEMeasurable g μ :=
mul_comm g f ▸ AEMeasurable.mul_iff_right hf
/-- `DivInvMonoid.Pow` is measurable. -/
instance DivInvMonoid.measurableZPow (G : Type u) [DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableSpace G]
[MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] : MeasurablePow G ℤ :=
⟨measurable_from_prod_countable fun n => by
cases' n with n n
· simp_rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact measurable_id.pow_const _
· simp_rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact (measurable_id.pow_const (n + 1)).inv⟩
#align div_inv_monoid.has_measurable_zpow DivInvMonoid.measurableZPow
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) measurableDiv₂_of_mul_inv (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
[DivInvMonoid G] [MeasurableMul₂ G] [MeasurableInv G] : MeasurableDiv₂ G :=
⟨by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
exact measurable_fst.mul measurable_snd.inv⟩
#align has_measurable_div₂_of_mul_inv measurableDiv₂_of_mul_inv
#align has_measurable_div₂_of_add_neg measurableDiv₂_of_add_neg
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableDiv.toMeasurableInv [MeasurableSpace α] [Group α]
[MeasurableDiv α] : MeasurableInv α where
measurable_inv := by simpa using measurable_const_div (1 : α)
/-- We say that the action of `M` on `α` has `MeasurableVAdd` if for each `c` the map `x ↦ c +ᵥ x`
is a measurable function and for each `x` the map `c ↦ c +ᵥ x` is a measurable function. -/
class MeasurableVAdd (M α : Type*) [VAdd M α] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Prop where
measurable_const_vadd : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c +ᵥ · : α → α)
measurable_vadd_const : ∀ x : α, Measurable (· +ᵥ x : M → α)
#align has_measurable_vadd MeasurableVAdd
#align has_measurable_vadd.measurable_const_vadd MeasurableVAdd.measurable_const_vadd
#align has_measurable_vadd.measurable_vadd_const MeasurableVAdd.measurable_vadd_const
/-- We say that the action of `M` on `α` has `MeasurableSMul` if for each `c` the map `x ↦ c • x`
is a measurable function and for each `x` the map `c ↦ c • x` is a measurable function. -/
@[to_additive]
class MeasurableSMul (M α : Type*) [SMul M α] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Prop where
measurable_const_smul : ∀ c : M, Measurable (c • · : α → α)
measurable_smul_const : ∀ x : α, Measurable (· • x : M → α)
#align has_measurable_smul MeasurableSMul
#align has_measurable_smul.measurable_const_smul MeasurableSMul.measurable_const_smul
#align has_measurable_smul.measurable_smul_const MeasurableSMul.measurable_smul_const
/-- We say that the action of `M` on `α` has `MeasurableVAdd₂` if the map
`(c, x) ↦ c +ᵥ x` is a measurable function. -/
class MeasurableVAdd₂ (M α : Type*) [VAdd M α] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Prop where
measurable_vadd : Measurable (Function.uncurry (· +ᵥ ·) : M × α → α)
#align has_measurable_vadd₂ MeasurableVAdd₂
#align has_measurable_vadd₂.measurable_vadd MeasurableVAdd₂.measurable_vadd
/-- We say that the action of `M` on `α` has `Measurable_SMul₂` if the map
`(c, x) ↦ c • x` is a measurable function. -/
@[to_additive MeasurableVAdd₂]
class MeasurableSMul₂ (M α : Type*) [SMul M α] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] :
Prop where
measurable_smul : Measurable (Function.uncurry (· • ·) : M × α → α)
#align has_measurable_smul₂ MeasurableSMul₂
#align has_measurable_smul₂.measurable_smul MeasurableSMul₂.measurable_smul
export MeasurableSMul (measurable_const_smul measurable_smul_const)
export MeasurableSMul₂ (measurable_smul)
export MeasurableVAdd (measurable_const_vadd measurable_vadd_const)
export MeasurableVAdd₂ (measurable_vadd)
@[to_additive]
instance measurableSMul_of_mul (M : Type*) [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul M] :
MeasurableSMul M M :=
⟨measurable_id.const_mul, measurable_id.mul_const⟩
#align has_measurable_smul_of_mul measurableSMul_of_mul
#align has_measurable_vadd_of_add measurableVAdd_of_add
@[to_additive]
instance measurableSMul₂_of_mul (M : Type*) [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul₂ M] :
MeasurableSMul₂ M M :=
⟨measurable_mul⟩
#align has_measurable_smul₂_of_mul measurableSMul₂_of_mul
#align has_measurable_smul₂_of_add measurableSMul₂_of_add
@[to_additive]
instance Submonoid.measurableSMul {M α} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] [Monoid M]
[MulAction M α] [MeasurableSMul M α] (s : Submonoid M) : MeasurableSMul s α :=
⟨fun c => by simpa only using measurable_const_smul (c : M), fun x =>
(measurable_smul_const x : Measurable fun c : M => c • x).comp measurable_subtype_coe⟩
#align submonoid.has_measurable_smul Submonoid.measurableSMul
#align add_submonoid.has_measurable_vadd AddSubmonoid.measurableVAdd
@[to_additive]
instance Subgroup.measurableSMul {G α} [MeasurableSpace G] [MeasurableSpace α] [Group G]
[MulAction G α] [MeasurableSMul G α] (s : Subgroup G) : MeasurableSMul s α :=
s.toSubmonoid.measurableSMul
#align subgroup.has_measurable_smul Subgroup.measurableSMul
#align add_subgroup.has_measurable_vadd AddSubgroup.measurableVAdd
section SMul
variable {M β α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace β] [_root_.SMul M β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {f : α → M} {g : α → β}
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem Measurable.smul [MeasurableSMul₂ M β] (hf : Measurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
Measurable fun x => f x • g x :=
measurable_smul.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measurable.smul Measurable.smul
#align measurable.vadd Measurable.vadd
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
theorem AEMeasurable.smul [MeasurableSMul₂ M β] {μ : Measure α} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEMeasurable g μ) : AEMeasurable (fun x => f x • g x) μ :=
MeasurableSMul₂.measurable_smul.comp_aemeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align ae_measurable.smul AEMeasurable.smul
#align ae_measurable.vadd AEMeasurable.vadd
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) MeasurableSMul₂.toMeasurableSMul [MeasurableSMul₂ M β] :
MeasurableSMul M β :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_const.smul measurable_id, fun _ => measurable_id.smul measurable_const⟩
#align has_measurable_smul₂.to_has_measurable_smul MeasurableSMul₂.toMeasurableSMul
#align has_measurable_vadd₂.to_has_measurable_vadd MeasurableVAdd₂.toMeasurableVAdd
variable [MeasurableSMul M β] {μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.smul_const (hf : Measurable f) (y : β) : Measurable fun x => f x • y :=
(MeasurableSMul.measurable_smul_const y).comp hf
#align measurable.smul_const Measurable.smul_const
#align measurable.vadd_const Measurable.vadd_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.smul_const (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (y : β) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => f x • y) μ :=
(MeasurableSMul.measurable_smul_const y).comp_aemeasurable hf
#align ae_measurable.smul_const AEMeasurable.smul_const
#align ae_measurable.vadd_const AEMeasurable.vadd_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_smul' (hg : Measurable g) (c : M) : Measurable fun x => c • g x :=
(MeasurableSMul.measurable_const_smul c).comp hg
#align measurable.const_smul' Measurable.const_smul'
#align measurable.const_vadd' Measurable.const_vadd'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Measurable.const_smul (hg : Measurable g) (c : M) : Measurable (c • g) :=
hg.const_smul' c
#align measurable.const_smul Measurable.const_smul
#align measurable.const_vadd Measurable.const_vadd
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_smul' (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (c : M) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c • g x) μ :=
(MeasurableSMul.measurable_const_smul c).comp_aemeasurable hg
#align ae_measurable.const_smul' AEMeasurable.const_smul'
#align ae_measurable.const_vadd' AEMeasurable.const_vadd'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem AEMeasurable.const_smul (hf : AEMeasurable g μ) (c : M) : AEMeasurable (c • g) μ :=
hf.const_smul' c
#align ae_measurable.const_smul AEMeasurable.const_smul
#align ae_measurable.const_vadd AEMeasurable.const_vadd
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.measurableSMul {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, SMul M (α i)]
[∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] [∀ i, MeasurableSMul M (α i)] :
MeasurableSMul M (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun i => (measurable_pi_apply i).const_smul _, fun _ =>
measurable_pi_iff.mpr fun _ => measurable_smul_const _⟩
#align pi.has_measurable_smul Pi.measurableSMul
#align pi.has_measurable_vadd Pi.measurableVAdd
/-- `AddMonoid.SMul` is measurable. -/
instance AddMonoid.measurableSMul_nat₂ (M : Type*) [AddMonoid M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableAdd₂ M] : MeasurableSMul₂ ℕ M :=
⟨by
suffices Measurable fun p : M × ℕ => p.2 • p.1 by apply this.comp measurable_swap
refine measurable_from_prod_countable fun n => ?_
induction' n with n ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, zero_smul, ← Pi.zero_def, measurable_zero]
· simp only [succ_nsmul]
exact ih.add measurable_id⟩
#align add_monoid.has_measurable_smul_nat₂ AddMonoid.measurableSMul_nat₂
/-- `SubNegMonoid.SMulInt` is measurable. -/
instance SubNegMonoid.measurableSMul_int₂ (M : Type*) [SubNegMonoid M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableAdd₂ M] [MeasurableNeg M] : MeasurableSMul₂ ℤ M :=
⟨by
suffices Measurable fun p : M × ℤ => p.2 • p.1 by apply this.comp measurable_swap
refine measurable_from_prod_countable fun n => ?_
induction' n with n n ih
· simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, natCast_zsmul]
exact measurable_const_smul _
· simp only [negSucc_zsmul]
exact (measurable_const_smul _).neg⟩
#align sub_neg_monoid.has_measurable_smul_int₂ SubNegMonoid.measurableSMul_int₂
end SMul
section MulAction
variable {M β α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace β] [Monoid M] [MulAction M β]
[MeasurableSMul M β] [MeasurableSpace α] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α}
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] [MeasurableSpace G] [MulAction G β] [MeasurableSMul G β]
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_const_smul_iff (c : G) : (Measurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
#align measurable_const_smul_iff measurable_const_smul_iff
#align measurable_const_vadd_iff measurable_const_vadd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem aemeasurable_const_smul_iff (c : G) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c • f x) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
#align ae_measurable_const_smul_iff aemeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align ae_measurable_const_vadd_iff aemeasurable_const_vadd_iff
@[to_additive]
instance Units.instMeasurableSpace : MeasurableSpace Mˣ := MeasurableSpace.comap ((↑) : Mˣ → M) ‹_›
#align units.measurable_space Units.instMeasurableSpace
#align add_units.measurable_space AddUnits.instMeasurableSpace
@[to_additive]
instance Units.measurableSMul : MeasurableSMul Mˣ β where
measurable_const_smul c := (measurable_const_smul (c : M) : _)
measurable_smul_const x :=
(measurable_smul_const x : Measurable fun c : M => c • x).comp MeasurableSpace.le_map_comap
#align units.has_measurable_smul Units.measurableSMul
#align add_units.has_measurable_vadd AddUnits.measurableVAdd
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem IsUnit.measurable_const_smul_iff {c : M} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(Measurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ Measurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ measurable_const_smul_iff u
#align is_unit.measurable_const_smul_iff IsUnit.measurable_const_smul_iff
#align is_add_unit.measurable_const_vadd_iff IsAddUnit.measurable_const_vadd_iff
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem IsUnit.aemeasurable_const_smul_iff {c : M} (hc : IsUnit c) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c • f x) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ aemeasurable_const_smul_iff u
#align is_unit.ae_measurable_const_smul_iff IsUnit.aemeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align is_add_unit.ae_measurable_const_vadd_iff IsAddUnit.aemeasurable_const_vadd_iff
variable {G₀ : Type*} [GroupWithZero G₀] [MeasurableSpace G₀] [MulAction G₀ β]
[MeasurableSMul G₀ β]
theorem measurable_const_smul_iff₀ {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(Measurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ Measurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 c hc).measurable_const_smul_iff
#align measurable_const_smul_iff₀ measurable_const_smul_iff₀
theorem aemeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => c • f x) μ ↔ AEMeasurable f μ :=
(IsUnit.mk0 c hc).aemeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align ae_measurable_const_smul_iff₀ aemeasurable_const_smul_iff₀
end MulAction
/-!
### Opposite monoid
-/
section Opposite
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance MulOpposite.instMeasurableSpace {α : Type*} [h : MeasurableSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
MeasurableSpace.map op h
#align mul_opposite.measurable_space MulOpposite.instMeasurableSpace
#align add_opposite.measurable_space AddOpposite.instMeasurableSpace
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_mul_op {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] : Measurable (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) := fun _ =>
id
#align measurable_mul_op measurable_mul_op
#align measurable_add_op measurable_add_op
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_mul_unop {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] : Measurable (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
fun _ => id
#align measurable_mul_unop measurable_mul_unop
#align measurable_add_unop measurable_add_unop
@[to_additive]
instance MulOpposite.instMeasurableMul {M : Type*} [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableMul M] : MeasurableMul Mᵐᵒᵖ :=
⟨fun _ => measurable_mul_op.comp (measurable_mul_unop.mul_const _), fun _ =>
measurable_mul_op.comp (measurable_mul_unop.const_mul _)⟩
#align mul_opposite.has_measurable_mul MulOpposite.instMeasurableMul
#align add_opposite.has_measurable_add AddOpposite.instMeasurableAdd
@[to_additive]
instance MulOpposite.instMeasurableMul₂ {M : Type*} [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableMul₂ M] : MeasurableMul₂ Mᵐᵒᵖ :=
⟨measurable_mul_op.comp
((measurable_mul_unop.comp measurable_snd).mul (measurable_mul_unop.comp measurable_fst))⟩
#align mul_opposite.has_measurable_mul₂ MulOpposite.instMeasurableMul₂
#align add_opposite.has_measurable_mul₂ AddOpposite.instMeasurableMul₂
/-- If a scalar is central, then its right action is measurable when its left action is. -/
nonrec instance MeasurableSMul.op {M α} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] [SMul M α]
[SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar M α] [MeasurableSMul M α] : MeasurableSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α :=
⟨MulOpposite.rec' fun c =>
show Measurable fun x => op c • x by
simpa only [op_smul_eq_smul] using measurable_const_smul c,
fun x =>
show Measurable fun c => op (unop c) • x by
simpa only [op_smul_eq_smul] using (measurable_smul_const x).comp measurable_mul_unop⟩
#align has_measurable_smul.op MeasurableSMul.op
/-- If a scalar is central, then its right action is measurable when its left action is. -/
nonrec instance MeasurableSMul₂.op {M α} [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableSpace α] [SMul M α]
[SMul Mᵐᵒᵖ α] [IsCentralScalar M α] [MeasurableSMul₂ M α] : MeasurableSMul₂ Mᵐᵒᵖ α :=
⟨show Measurable fun x : Mᵐᵒᵖ × α => op (unop x.1) • x.2 by
simp_rw [op_smul_eq_smul]
exact (measurable_mul_unop.comp measurable_fst).smul measurable_snd⟩
#align has_measurable_smul₂.op MeasurableSMul₂.op
@[to_additive]
instance measurableSMul_opposite_of_mul {M : Type*} [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableMul M] : MeasurableSMul Mᵐᵒᵖ M :=
⟨fun c => measurable_mul_const (unop c), fun x => measurable_mul_unop.const_mul x⟩
#align has_measurable_smul_opposite_of_mul measurableSMul_opposite_of_mul
#align has_measurable_vadd_opposite_of_add measurableVAdd_opposite_of_add
@[to_additive]
instance measurableSMul₂_opposite_of_mul {M : Type*} [Mul M] [MeasurableSpace M]
[MeasurableMul₂ M] : MeasurableSMul₂ Mᵐᵒᵖ M :=
⟨measurable_snd.mul (measurable_mul_unop.comp measurable_fst)⟩
#align has_measurable_smul₂_opposite_of_mul measurableSMul₂_opposite_of_mul
#align has_measurable_smul₂_opposite_of_add measurableSMul₂_opposite_of_add
end Opposite
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M α : Type*} [Monoid M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul₂ M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem List.measurable_prod' (l : List (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Measurable f) :
Measurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact measurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
#align list.measurable_prod' List.measurable_prod'
#align list.measurable_sum' List.measurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem List.aemeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable l.prod μ := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact aemeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
#align list.ae_measurable_prod' List.aemeasurable_prod'
#align list.ae_measurable_sum' List.aemeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem List.measurable_prod (l : List (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.measurable_prod' hl
#align list.measurable_prod List.measurable_prod
#align list.measurable_sum List.measurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem List.aemeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod) μ := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.aemeasurable_prod' hl
#align list.ae_measurable_prod List.aemeasurable_prod
#align list.ae_measurable_sum List.aemeasurable_sum
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M ι α : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [MeasurableSpace M] [MeasurableMul₂ M]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → α → M}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Multiset.measurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, Measurable f) :
Measurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.measurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
#align multiset.measurable_prod' Multiset.measurable_prod'
#align multiset.measurable_sum' Multiset.measurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Multiset.aemeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M)) (hl : ∀ f ∈ l, AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable l.prod μ := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.aemeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
#align multiset.ae_measurable_prod' Multiset.aemeasurable_prod'
#align multiset.ae_measurable_sum' Multiset.aemeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Multiset.measurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M)) (hs : ∀ f ∈ s, Measurable f) :
Measurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.measurable_prod' hs
#align multiset.measurable_prod Multiset.measurable_prod
#align multiset.measurable_sum Multiset.measurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Multiset.aemeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M)) (hs : ∀ f ∈ s, AEMeasurable f μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod) μ := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.aemeasurable_prod' hs
#align multiset.ae_measurable_prod Multiset.aemeasurable_prod
#align multiset.ae_measurable_sum Multiset.aemeasurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Finset.measurable_prod' (s : Finset ι) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Measurable (f i)) :
Measurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _ _ => Measurable.mul) (@measurable_one M _ _ _ _) hf
#align finset.measurable_prod' Finset.measurable_prod'
#align finset.measurable_sum' Finset.measurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Finset.measurable_prod (s : Finset ι) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Measurable (f i)) :
Measurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.measurable_prod' hf
#align finset.measurable_prod Finset.measurable_prod
#align finset.measurable_sum Finset.measurable_sum
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem Finset.aemeasurable_prod' (s : Finset ι) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
AEMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) μ :=
Multiset.aemeasurable_prod' _ fun _g hg =>
let ⟨_i, hi, hg⟩ := Multiset.mem_map.1 hg
hg ▸ hf _ hi
#align finset.ae_measurable_prod' Finset.aemeasurable_prod'
#align finset.ae_measurable_sum' Finset.aemeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Arithmetic.lean | 999 | 1,001 | theorem Finset.aemeasurable_prod (s : Finset ι) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) :
AEMeasurable (fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a) μ := by |
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.aemeasurable_prod' hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Arithmetic
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.exponential from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
/-! # Ordinal exponential
In this file we define the power function and the logarithm function on ordinals. The two are
related by the lemma `Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x` for nontrivial inputs
`b`, `c`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
/-- The ordinal exponential, defined by transfinite recursion. -/
instance pow : Pow Ordinal Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b⟩
-- Porting note: Ambiguous notations.
-- local infixr:0 "^" => @Pow.pow Ordinal Ordinal Ordinal.instPowOrdinalOrdinal
theorem opow_def (a b : Ordinal) :
a ^ b = if a = 0 then 1 - b else limitRecOn b 1 (fun _ IH => IH * a) fun b _ => bsup.{u, u} b :=
rfl
#align ordinal.opow_def Ordinal.opow_def
-- Porting note: `if_pos rfl` → `if_true`
theorem zero_opow' (a : Ordinal) : 0 ^ a = 1 - a := by simp only [opow_def, if_true]
#align ordinal.zero_opow' Ordinal.zero_opow'
@[simp]
theorem zero_opow {a : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) : (0 : Ordinal) ^ a = 0 := by
rwa [zero_opow', Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.zero_opow Ordinal.zero_opow
@[simp]
theorem opow_zero (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 := by
by_cases h : a = 0
· simp only [opow_def, if_pos h, sub_zero]
· simp only [opow_def, if_neg h, limitRecOn_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_zero Ordinal.opow_zero
@[simp]
theorem opow_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ succ b = a ^ b * a :=
if h : a = 0 then by subst a; simp only [zero_opow (succ_ne_zero _), mul_zero]
else by simp only [opow_def, limitRecOn_succ, if_neg h]
#align ordinal.opow_succ Ordinal.opow_succ
theorem opow_limit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b = bsup.{u, u} b fun c _ => a ^ c := by
simp only [opow_def, if_neg a0]; rw [limitRecOn_limit _ _ _ _ h]
#align ordinal.opow_limit Ordinal.opow_limit
theorem opow_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : a ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit b) :
a ^ b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a ^ b' ≤ c := by rw [opow_limit a0 h, bsup_le_iff]
#align ordinal.opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.opow_le_of_limit
theorem lt_opow_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (h : IsLimit c) :
a < b ^ c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b ^ c' := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists]; simp only [not_lt, opow_le_of_limit b0 h, exists_prop, not_and]
#align ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit Ordinal.lt_opow_of_limit
@[simp]
theorem opow_one (a : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 : Ordinal) = a := by
rw [← succ_zero, opow_succ]; simp only [opow_zero, one_mul]
#align ordinal.opow_one Ordinal.opow_one
@[simp]
theorem one_opow (a : Ordinal) : (1 : Ordinal) ^ a = 1 := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero]
| H₂ _ ih =>
simp only [opow_succ, ih, mul_one]
| H₃ b l IH =>
refine eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun c => ?_
rw [opow_le_of_limit Ordinal.one_ne_zero l]
exact ⟨fun H => by simpa only [opow_zero] using H 0 l.pos, fun H b' h => by rwa [IH _ h]⟩
#align ordinal.one_opow Ordinal.one_opow
theorem opow_pos {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b := by
have h0 : 0 < a ^ (0 : Ordinal) := by simp only [opow_zero, zero_lt_one]
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => exact h0
| H₂ b IH =>
rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_pos IH a0
| H₃ b l _ =>
exact (lt_opow_of_limit (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 a0) l).2 ⟨0, l.pos, h0⟩
#align ordinal.opow_pos Ordinal.opow_pos
theorem opow_ne_zero {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| opow_pos b <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0
#align ordinal.opow_ne_zero Ordinal.opow_ne_zero
theorem opow_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 1 < a) : IsNormal (a ^ ·) :=
have a0 : 0 < a := zero_lt_one.trans h
⟨fun b => by simpa only [mul_one, opow_succ] using (mul_lt_mul_iff_left (opow_pos b a0)).2 h,
fun b l c => opow_le_of_limit (ne_of_gt a0) l⟩
#align ordinal.opow_is_normal Ordinal.opow_isNormal
theorem opow_lt_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b < a ^ c ↔ b < c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).lt_iff
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_le_opow_iff_right {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).le_iff
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_iff_right
theorem opow_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b = a ^ c ↔ b = c :=
(opow_isNormal a1).inj
#align ordinal.opow_right_inj Ordinal.opow_right_inj
theorem opow_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a ^ b) :=
(opow_isNormal a1).isLimit
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit Ordinal.opow_isLimit
theorem opow_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (hb : b ≠ 0) : IsLimit (a ^ b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (e | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | l')
· exact absurd e hb
· rw [opow_succ]
exact mul_isLimit (opow_pos _ l.pos) l
· exact opow_isLimit l.one_lt l'
#align ordinal.opow_is_limit_left Ordinal.opow_isLimit_left
theorem opow_le_opow_right {a b c : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_pos.2 h₁) with h₁ | h₁
· exact (opow_le_opow_iff_right h₁).2 h₂
· subst a
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
simp only [one_opow, le_refl]
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_right Ordinal.opow_le_opow_right
theorem opow_le_opow_left {a b : Ordinal} (c : Ordinal) (ab : a ≤ b) : a ^ c ≤ b ^ c := by
by_cases a0 : a = 0
-- Porting note: `le_refl` is required.
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· subst c
simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
· simp only [zero_opow c0, Ordinal.zero_le]
· induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [opow_zero, le_refl]
| H₂ c IH =>
simpa only [opow_succ] using mul_le_mul' IH ab
| H₃ c l IH =>
exact
(opow_le_of_limit a0 l).2 fun b' h =>
(IH _ h).trans (opow_le_opow_right ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0).trans_le ab) h.le)
#align ordinal.opow_le_opow_left Ordinal.opow_le_opow_left
theorem left_le_opow (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (b1 : 0 < b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
nth_rw 1 [← opow_one a]
cases' le_or_gt a 1 with a1 a1
· rcases lt_or_eq_of_le a1 with a0 | a1
· rw [lt_one_iff_zero] at a0
rw [a0, zero_opow Ordinal.one_ne_zero]
exact Ordinal.zero_le _
rw [a1, one_opow, one_opow]
rwa [opow_le_opow_iff_right a1, one_le_iff_pos]
#align ordinal.left_le_opow Ordinal.left_le_opow
theorem right_le_opow {a : Ordinal} (b : Ordinal) (a1 : 1 < a) : b ≤ a ^ b :=
(opow_isNormal a1).self_le _
#align ordinal.right_le_opow Ordinal.right_le_opow
theorem opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ {a b c : Ordinal} (ab : a < b) : a ^ succ c < b ^ succ c := by
rw [opow_succ, opow_succ]
exact
(mul_le_mul_right' (opow_le_opow_left c ab.le) a).trans_lt
(mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left ab (opow_pos c ((Ordinal.zero_le a).trans_lt ab)))
#align ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ Ordinal.opow_lt_opow_left_of_succ
theorem opow_add (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | a0)
· rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | c0)
· simp
have : b + c ≠ 0 := ((Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 c0).trans_le (le_add_left _ _)).ne'
simp only [zero_opow c0, zero_opow this, mul_zero]
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with (rfl | a1)
· simp only [one_opow, mul_one]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [add_succ, opow_succ, IH, opow_succ, mul_assoc]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (add_isNormal b)).limit_le l).trans ?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact
(((mul_isNormal <| opow_pos b (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 a0)).trans
(opow_isNormal a1)).limit_le
l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_add Ordinal.opow_add
theorem opow_one_add (a b : Ordinal) : a ^ (1 + b) = a * a ^ b := by rw [opow_add, opow_one]
#align ordinal.opow_one_add Ordinal.opow_one_add
theorem opow_dvd_opow (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c :=
⟨a ^ (c - b), by rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow
theorem opow_dvd_opow_iff {a b c : Ordinal} (a1 : 1 < a) : a ^ b ∣ a ^ c ↔ b ≤ c :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
not_le_of_lt ((opow_lt_opow_iff_right a1).2 hn) <|
le_of_dvd (opow_ne_zero _ <| one_le_iff_ne_zero.1 <| a1.le) h,
opow_dvd_opow _⟩
#align ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff Ordinal.opow_dvd_opow_iff
theorem opow_mul (a b c : Ordinal) : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
by_cases b0 : b = 0; · simp only [b0, zero_mul, opow_zero, one_opow]
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· subst a
by_cases c0 : c = 0
· simp only [c0, mul_zero, opow_zero]
simp only [zero_opow b0, zero_opow c0, zero_opow (mul_ne_zero b0 c0)]
cases' eq_or_lt_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 a0) with a1 a1
· subst a1
simp only [one_opow]
induction c using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, opow_zero]
| H₂ c IH =>
rw [mul_succ, opow_add, IH, opow_succ]
| H₃ c l IH =>
refine
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d =>
(((opow_isNormal a1).trans (mul_isNormal (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0))).limit_le
l).trans
?_
dsimp only [Function.comp_def]
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IH]
exact (opow_le_of_limit (opow_ne_zero _ a0) l).symm
#align ordinal.opow_mul Ordinal.opow_mul
/-! ### Ordinal logarithm -/
/-- The ordinal logarithm is the solution `u` to the equation `x = b ^ u * v + w` where `v < b` and
`w < b ^ u`. -/
-- @[pp_nodot] -- Porting note: Unknown attribute.
def log (b : Ordinal) (x : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if _h : 1 < b then pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) else 0
#align ordinal.log Ordinal.log
/-- The set in the definition of `log` is nonempty. -/
theorem log_nonempty {b x : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) : { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨_, succ_le_iff.1 (right_le_opow _ h)⟩
#align ordinal.log_nonempty Ordinal.log_nonempty
theorem log_def {b : Ordinal} (h : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
log b x = pred (sInf { o | x < b ^ o }) := by simp only [log, dif_pos h]
#align ordinal.log_def Ordinal.log_def
theorem log_of_not_one_lt_left {b : Ordinal} (h : ¬1 < b) (x : Ordinal) : log b x = 0 := by
simp only [log, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left Ordinal.log_of_not_one_lt_left
theorem log_of_left_le_one {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ 1) : ∀ x, log b x = 0 :=
log_of_not_one_lt_left h.not_lt
#align ordinal.log_of_left_le_one Ordinal.log_of_left_le_one
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_left : ∀ b, log 0 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one zero_le_one
#align ordinal.log_zero_left Ordinal.log_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem log_zero_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 0 = 0 :=
if b1 : 1 < b then by
rw [log_def b1, ← Ordinal.le_zero, pred_le]
apply csInf_le'
dsimp
rw [succ_zero, opow_one]
exact zero_lt_one.trans b1
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left b1]
#align ordinal.log_zero_right Ordinal.log_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem log_one_left : ∀ b, log 1 b = 0 :=
log_of_left_le_one le_rfl
#align ordinal.log_one_left Ordinal.log_one_left
theorem succ_log_def {b x : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
succ (log b x) = sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o } := by
let t := sInf { o : Ordinal | x < b ^ o }
have : x < (b^t) := csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit t with (h | h | h)
· refine ((one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx).not_lt ?_).elim
simpa only [h, opow_zero] using this
· rw [show log b x = pred t from log_def hb x, succ_pred_iff_is_succ.2 h]
· rcases (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' h).1 this with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact h₁.not_le.elim ((le_csInf_iff'' (log_nonempty hb)).1 le_rfl a h₂)
#align ordinal.succ_log_def Ordinal.succ_log_def
theorem lt_opow_succ_log_self {b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (x : Ordinal) :
x < b ^ succ (log b x) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· apply opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
· rw [succ_log_def hb hx]
exact csInf_mem (log_nonempty hb)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self Ordinal.lt_opow_succ_log_self
theorem opow_log_le_self (b : Ordinal) {x : Ordinal} (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ log b x ≤ x := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | b0)
· rw [zero_opow']
exact (sub_le_self _ _).trans (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 hx)
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 b0) with (hb | rfl)
· refine le_of_not_lt fun h => (lt_succ (log b x)).not_le ?_
have := @csInf_le' _ _ { o | x < b ^ o } _ h
rwa [← succ_log_def hb hx] at this
· rwa [one_opow, one_le_iff_ne_zero]
#align ordinal.opow_log_le_self Ordinal.opow_log_le_self
/-- `opow b` and `log b` (almost) form a Galois connection. -/
theorem opow_le_iff_le_log {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : b ^ c ≤ x ↔ c ≤ log b x :=
⟨fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn =>
(lt_opow_succ_log_self hb x).not_le <|
((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 (succ_le_of_lt hn)).trans h,
fun h => ((opow_le_opow_iff_right hb).2 h).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)⟩
#align ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log Ordinal.opow_le_iff_le_log
theorem lt_opow_iff_log_lt {b x c : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (hx : x ≠ 0) : x < b ^ c ↔ log b x < c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (opow_le_iff_le_log hb hx)
#align ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt Ordinal.lt_opow_iff_log_lt
theorem log_pos {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) : 0 < log b o := by
rwa [← succ_le_iff, succ_zero, ← opow_le_iff_le_log hb ho, opow_one]
#align ordinal.log_pos Ordinal.log_pos
theorem log_eq_zero {b o : Ordinal} (hbo : o < b) : log b o = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne o 0 with (rfl | ho)
· exact log_zero_right b
rcases le_or_lt b 1 with hb | hb
· rcases le_one_iff.1 hb with (rfl | rfl)
· exact log_zero_left o
· exact log_one_left o
· rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, ← lt_succ_iff, succ_zero, ← lt_opow_iff_log_lt hb ho, opow_one]
#align ordinal.log_eq_zero Ordinal.log_eq_zero
@[mono]
theorem log_mono_right (b : Ordinal) {x y : Ordinal} (xy : x ≤ y) : log b x ≤ log b y :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
if hb : 1 < b then
(opow_le_iff_le_log hb (lt_of_lt_of_le (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) xy).ne').1 <|
(opow_log_le_self _ hx).trans xy
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
#align ordinal.log_mono_right Ordinal.log_mono_right
theorem log_le_self (b x : Ordinal) : log b x ≤ x :=
if hx : x = 0 then by simp only [hx, log_zero_right, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
if hb : 1 < b then (right_le_opow _ hb).trans (opow_log_le_self b hx)
else by simp only [log_of_not_one_lt_left hb, Ordinal.zero_le]
#align ordinal.log_le_self Ordinal.log_le_self
@[simp]
theorem log_one_right (b : Ordinal) : log b 1 = 0 :=
if hb : 1 < b then log_eq_zero hb else log_of_not_one_lt_left hb 1
#align ordinal.log_one_right Ordinal.log_one_right
theorem mod_opow_log_lt_self (b : Ordinal) {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : o % (b ^ log b o) < o := by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simpa using Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ho
· exact (mod_lt _ <| opow_ne_zero _ hb).trans_le (opow_log_le_self _ ho)
#align ordinal.mod_opow_log_lt_self Ordinal.mod_opow_log_lt_self
theorem log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self {b o : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o ≠ 0) (hbo : b ≤ o) :
log b (o % (b ^ log b o)) < log b o := by
rcases eq_or_ne (o % (b ^ log b o)) 0 with h | h
· rw [h, log_zero_right]
apply log_pos hb ho hbo
· rw [← succ_le_iff, succ_log_def hb h]
apply csInf_le'
apply mod_lt
rw [← Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact opow_pos _ (zero_lt_one.trans hb)
#align ordinal.log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self Ordinal.log_mod_opow_log_lt_log_self
theorem opow_mul_add_pos {b v : Ordinal} (hb : b ≠ 0) (u : Ordinal) (hv : v ≠ 0) (w : Ordinal) :
0 < b ^ u * v + w :=
(opow_pos u <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb).trans_le <|
(le_mul_left _ <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hv).trans <| le_add_right _ _
#align ordinal.opow_mul_add_pos Ordinal.opow_mul_add_pos
theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ {b u w : Ordinal} (v : Ordinal) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ u * succ v := by rwa [mul_succ, add_lt_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ Ordinal.opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Exponential.lean | 407 | 411 | theorem opow_mul_add_lt_opow_succ {b u v w : Ordinal} (hvb : v < b) (hw : w < b ^ u) :
b ^ u * v + w < b ^ succ u := by |
convert (opow_mul_add_lt_opow_mul_succ v hw).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt hvb) _)
using 1
exact opow_succ b u
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import data.rel from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"706d88f2b8fdfeb0b22796433d7a6c1a010af9f2"
/-!
# Relations
This file defines bundled relations. A relation between `α` and `β` is a function `α → β → Prop`.
Relations are also known as set-valued functions, or partial multifunctions.
## Main declarations
* `Rel α β`: Relation between `α` and `β`.
* `Rel.inv`: `r.inv` is the `Rel β α` obtained by swapping the arguments of `r`.
* `Rel.dom`: Domain of a relation. `x ∈ r.dom` iff there exists `y` such that `r x y`.
* `Rel.codom`: Codomain, aka range, of a relation. `y ∈ r.codom` iff there exists `x` such that
`r x y`.
* `Rel.comp`: Relation composition. Note that the arguments order follows the `CategoryTheory/`
one, so `r.comp s x z ↔ ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z`.
* `Rel.image`: Image of a set under a relation. `r.image s` is the set of `f x` over all `x ∈ s`.
* `Rel.preimage`: Preimage of a set under a relation. Note that `r.preimage = r.inv.image`.
* `Rel.core`: Core of a set. For `s : Set β`, `r.core s` is the set of `x : α` such that all `y`
related to `x` are in `s`.
* `Rel.restrict_domain`: Domain-restriction of a relation to a subtype.
* `Function.graph`: Graph of a function as a relation.
## TODOs
The `Rel.comp` function uses the notation `r • s`, rather than the more common `r ∘ s` for things
named `comp`. This is because the latter is already used for function composition, and causes a
clash. A better notation should be found, perhaps a variant of `r ∘r s` or `r; s`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
/-- A relation on `α` and `β`, aka a set-valued function, aka a partial multifunction -/
def Rel (α β : Type*) :=
α → β → Prop -- deriving CompleteLattice, Inhabited
#align rel Rel
-- Porting note: `deriving` above doesn't work.
instance : CompleteLattice (Rel α β) := show CompleteLattice (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
instance : Inhabited (Rel α β) := show Inhabited (α → β → Prop) from inferInstance
namespace Rel
variable (r : Rel α β)
-- Porting note: required for later theorems.
@[ext] theorem ext {r s : Rel α β} : (∀ a, r a = s a) → r = s := funext
/-- The inverse relation : `r.inv x y ↔ r y x`. Note that this is *not* a groupoid inverse. -/
def inv : Rel β α :=
flip r
#align rel.inv Rel.inv
theorem inv_def (x : α) (y : β) : r.inv y x ↔ r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.inv_def Rel.inv_def
theorem inv_inv : inv (inv r) = r := by
ext x y
rfl
#align rel.inv_inv Rel.inv_inv
/-- Domain of a relation -/
def dom := { x | ∃ y, r x y }
#align rel.dom Rel.dom
theorem dom_mono {r s : Rel α β} (h : r ≤ s) : dom r ⊆ dom s := fun a ⟨b, hx⟩ => ⟨b, h a b hx⟩
#align rel.dom_mono Rel.dom_mono
/-- Codomain aka range of a relation -/
def codom := { y | ∃ x, r x y }
#align rel.codom Rel.codom
theorem codom_inv : r.inv.codom = r.dom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.codom_inv Rel.codom_inv
theorem dom_inv : r.inv.dom = r.codom := by
ext x
rfl
#align rel.dom_inv Rel.dom_inv
/-- Composition of relation; note that it follows the `CategoryTheory/` order of arguments. -/
def comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : Rel α γ := fun x z => ∃ y, r x y ∧ s y z
#align rel.comp Rel.comp
-- Porting note: the original `∘` syntax can't be overloaded here, lean considers it ambiguous.
/-- Local syntax for composition of relations. -/
local infixr:90 " • " => Rel.comp
theorem comp_assoc {δ : Type*} (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) (t : Rel γ δ) :
(r • s) • t = r • (s • t) := by
unfold comp; ext (x w); constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩; exact ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rxy, z, syz, tzw⟩; exact ⟨z, ⟨y, rxy, syz⟩, tzw⟩
#align rel.comp_assoc Rel.comp_assoc
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_id (r : Rel α β) : r • @Eq β = r := by
unfold comp
ext y
simp
#align rel.comp_right_id Rel.comp_right_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_id (r : Rel α β) : @Eq α • r = r := by
unfold comp
ext x
simp
#align rel.comp_left_id Rel.comp_left_id
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_bot (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊥ : Rel β γ) = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_bot (r : Rel α β) : (⊥ : Rel γ α) • r = ⊥ := by
ext x y
simp [comp, Bot.bot]
@[simp]
theorem comp_right_top (r : Rel α β) : r • (⊤ : Rel β γ) = fun x _ ↦ x ∈ r.dom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, dom]
@[simp]
theorem comp_left_top (r : Rel α β) : (⊤ : Rel γ α) • r = fun _ y ↦ y ∈ r.codom := by
ext x z
simp [comp, Top.top, codom]
theorem inv_id : inv (@Eq α) = @Eq α := by
ext x y
constructor <;> apply Eq.symm
#align rel.inv_id Rel.inv_id
theorem inv_comp (r : Rel α β) (s : Rel β γ) : inv (r • s) = inv s • inv r := by
ext x z
simp [comp, inv, flip, and_comm]
#align rel.inv_comp Rel.inv_comp
@[simp]
theorem inv_bot : (⊥ : Rel α β).inv = (⊥ : Rel β α) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Bot.bot, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Bot.bot, inv, Function.flip_def]
@[simp]
theorem inv_top : (⊤ : Rel α β).inv = (⊤ : Rel β α) := by
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-16: simp was `simp [Top.top, inv, flip]` -/
simp [Top.top, inv, Function.flip_def]
/-- Image of a set under a relation -/
def image (s : Set α) : Set β := { y | ∃ x ∈ s, r x y }
#align rel.image Rel.image
theorem mem_image (y : β) (s : Set α) : y ∈ image r s ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.mem_image Rel.mem_image
theorem image_subset : ((· ⊆ ·) ⇒ (· ⊆ ·)) r.image r.image := fun _ _ h _ ⟨x, xs, rxy⟩ =>
⟨x, h xs, rxy⟩
#align rel.image_subset Rel.image_subset
theorem image_mono : Monotone r.image :=
r.image_subset
#align rel.image_mono Rel.image_mono
theorem image_inter (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.image s ∩ r.image t :=
r.image_mono.map_inf_le s t
#align rel.image_inter Rel.image_inter
theorem image_union (s t : Set α) : r.image (s ∪ t) = r.image s ∪ r.image t :=
le_antisymm
(fun _y ⟨x, xst, rxy⟩ =>
xst.elim (fun xs => Or.inl ⟨x, ⟨xs, rxy⟩⟩) fun xt => Or.inr ⟨x, ⟨xt, rxy⟩⟩)
(r.image_mono.le_map_sup s t)
#align rel.image_union Rel.image_union
@[simp]
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : image (@Eq α) s = s := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
#align rel.image_id Rel.image_id
theorem image_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set α) : image (r • s) t = image s (image r t) := by
ext z; simp only [mem_image]; constructor
· rintro ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩; exact ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩
· rintro ⟨y, ⟨x, xt, rxy⟩, syz⟩; exact ⟨x, xt, y, rxy, syz⟩
#align rel.image_comp Rel.image_comp
theorem image_univ : r.image Set.univ = r.codom := by
ext y
simp [mem_image, codom]
#align rel.image_univ Rel.image_univ
@[simp]
theorem image_empty : r.image ∅ = ∅ := by
ext x
simp [mem_image]
@[simp]
theorem image_bot (s : Set α) : (⊥ : Rel α β).image s = ∅ := by
rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
intro x h
simp [mem_image, Bot.bot] at h
@[simp]
theorem image_top {s : Set α} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).image s = Set.univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall fun x ↦ ⟨h.some, by simp [h.some_mem, Top.top]⟩
/-- Preimage of a set under a relation `r`. Same as the image of `s` under `r.inv` -/
def preimage (s : Set β) : Set α :=
r.inv.image s
#align rel.preimage Rel.preimage
theorem mem_preimage (x : α) (s : Set β) : x ∈ r.preimage s ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, r x y :=
Iff.rfl
#align rel.mem_preimage Rel.mem_preimage
theorem preimage_def (s : Set β) : preimage r s = { x | ∃ y ∈ s, r x y } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_preimage _ _ _
#align rel.preimage_def Rel.preimage_def
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : r.preimage s ⊆ r.preimage t :=
image_mono _ h
#align rel.preimage_mono Rel.preimage_mono
theorem preimage_inter (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ t) ⊆ r.preimage s ∩ r.preimage t :=
image_inter _ s t
#align rel.preimage_inter Rel.preimage_inter
theorem preimage_union (s t : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∪ t) = r.preimage s ∪ r.preimage t :=
image_union _ s t
#align rel.preimage_union Rel.preimage_union
theorem preimage_id (s : Set α) : preimage (@Eq α) s = s := by
simp only [preimage, inv_id, image_id]
#align rel.preimage_id Rel.preimage_id
theorem preimage_comp (s : Rel β γ) (t : Set γ) :
preimage (r • s) t = preimage r (preimage s t) := by simp only [preimage, inv_comp, image_comp]
#align rel.preimage_comp Rel.preimage_comp
theorem preimage_univ : r.preimage Set.univ = r.dom := by rw [preimage, image_univ, codom_inv]
#align rel.preimage_univ Rel.preimage_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : r.preimage ∅ = ∅ := by rw [preimage, image_empty]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inv (s : Set α) : r.inv.preimage s = r.image s := by rw [preimage, inv_inv]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_bot (s : Set β) : (⊥ : Rel α β).preimage s = ∅ := by
rw [preimage, inv_bot, image_bot]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_top {s : Set β} (h : Set.Nonempty s) :
(⊤ : Rel α β).preimage s = Set.univ := by rwa [← inv_top, preimage, inv_inv, image_top]
theorem image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset {s : Set β} (h : r.codom ⊆ s) : r.preimage s = r.dom := by
rw [← preimage_univ]
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· exact image_subset _ (Set.subset_univ _)
· intro x hx
simp only [mem_preimage, Set.mem_univ, true_and] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ryx⟩
have hy : y ∈ s := h ⟨x, ryx⟩
exact ⟨y, ⟨hy, ryx⟩⟩
theorem preimage_eq_codom_of_domain_subset {s : Set α} (h : r.dom ⊆ s) : r.image s = r.codom := by
apply r.inv.image_eq_dom_of_codomain_subset (by rwa [← codom_inv] at h)
theorem image_inter_dom_eq (s : Set α) : r.image (s ∩ r.dom) = r.image s := by
apply Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
· apply r.image_mono (by simp)
· intro x h
rw [mem_image] at *
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, ryx⟩
use y
suffices h : y ∈ r.dom by simp_all only [Set.mem_inter_iff, and_self]
rw [dom, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
use x
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Rel.lean | 300 | 301 | theorem preimage_inter_codom_eq (s : Set β) : r.preimage (s ∩ r.codom) = r.preimage s := by |
rw [← dom_inv, preimage, preimage, image_inter_dom_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.TensorProduct.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.ULift
#align_import ring_theory.is_tensor_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4926d76bb9c5a4a62ed2f03d998081786132105"
/-!
# The characteristic predicate of tensor product
## Main definitions
- `IsTensorProduct`: A predicate on `f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M` expressing that `f` realizes `M` as
the tensor product of `M₁ ⊗[R] M₂`. This is defined by requiring the lift `M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ → M` to be
bijective.
- `IsBaseChange`: A predicate on an `R`-algebra `S` and a map `f : M →ₗ[R] N` with `N` being an
`S`-module, expressing that `f` realizes `N` as the base change of `M` along `R → S`.
- `Algebra.IsPushout`: A predicate on the following diagram of scalar towers
```
R → S
↓ ↓
R' → S'
```
asserting that is a pushout diagram (i.e. `S' = S ⊗[R] R'`)
## Main results
- `TensorProduct.isBaseChange`: `S ⊗[R] M` is the base change of `M` along `R → S`.
-/
universe u v₁ v₂ v₃ v₄
open TensorProduct
section IsTensorProduct
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {M₁ M₂ M M' : Type*}
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M']
variable [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] [Module R M] [Module R M']
variable (f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M)
variable {N₁ N₂ N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂] [AddCommMonoid N]
variable [Module R N₁] [Module R N₂] [Module R N]
variable {g : N₁ →ₗ[R] N₂ →ₗ[R] N}
/-- Given a bilinear map `f : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M`, `IsTensorProduct f` means that
`M` is the tensor product of `M₁` and `M₂` via `f`.
This is defined by requiring the lift `M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ → M` to be bijective.
-/
def IsTensorProduct : Prop :=
Function.Bijective (TensorProduct.lift f)
#align is_tensor_product IsTensorProduct
variable (R M N) {f}
theorem TensorProduct.isTensorProduct : IsTensorProduct (TensorProduct.mk R M N) := by
delta IsTensorProduct
convert_to Function.Bijective (LinearMap.id : M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M ⊗[R] N) using 2
· apply TensorProduct.ext'
simp
· exact Function.bijective_id
#align tensor_product.is_tensor_product TensorProduct.isTensorProduct
variable {R M N}
/-- If `M` is the tensor product of `M₁` and `M₂`, it is linearly equivalent to `M₁ ⊗[R] M₂`. -/
@[simps! apply]
noncomputable def IsTensorProduct.equiv (h : IsTensorProduct f) : M₁ ⊗[R] M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M :=
LinearEquiv.ofBijective _ h
#align is_tensor_product.equiv IsTensorProduct.equiv
@[simp]
theorem IsTensorProduct.equiv_toLinearMap (h : IsTensorProduct f) :
h.equiv.toLinearMap = TensorProduct.lift f :=
rfl
#align is_tensor_product.equiv_to_linear_map IsTensorProduct.equiv_toLinearMap
@[simp]
theorem IsTensorProduct.equiv_symm_apply (h : IsTensorProduct f) (x₁ : M₁) (x₂ : M₂) :
h.equiv.symm (f x₁ x₂) = x₁ ⊗ₜ x₂ := by
apply h.equiv.injective
refine (h.equiv.apply_symm_apply _).trans ?_
simp
#align is_tensor_product.equiv_symm_apply IsTensorProduct.equiv_symm_apply
/-- If `M` is the tensor product of `M₁` and `M₂`, we may lift a bilinear map `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M'`
to a `M →ₗ[R] M'`. -/
noncomputable def IsTensorProduct.lift (h : IsTensorProduct f) (f' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M') :
M →ₗ[R] M' :=
(TensorProduct.lift f').comp h.equiv.symm.toLinearMap
#align is_tensor_product.lift IsTensorProduct.lift
theorem IsTensorProduct.lift_eq (h : IsTensorProduct f) (f' : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] M') (x₁ : M₁)
(x₂ : M₂) : h.lift f' (f x₁ x₂) = f' x₁ x₂ := by
delta IsTensorProduct.lift
simp
#align is_tensor_product.lift_eq IsTensorProduct.lift_eq
/-- The tensor product of a pair of linear maps between modules. -/
noncomputable def IsTensorProduct.map (hf : IsTensorProduct f) (hg : IsTensorProduct g)
(i₁ : M₁ →ₗ[R] N₁) (i₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) : M →ₗ[R] N :=
hg.equiv.toLinearMap.comp ((TensorProduct.map i₁ i₂).comp hf.equiv.symm.toLinearMap)
#align is_tensor_product.map IsTensorProduct.map
| Mathlib/RingTheory/IsTensorProduct.lean | 109 | 112 | theorem IsTensorProduct.map_eq (hf : IsTensorProduct f) (hg : IsTensorProduct g) (i₁ : M₁ →ₗ[R] N₁)
(i₂ : M₂ →ₗ[R] N₂) (x₁ : M₁) (x₂ : M₂) : hf.map hg i₁ i₂ (f x₁ x₂) = g (i₁ x₁) (i₂ x₂) := by |
delta IsTensorProduct.map
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.UpperLower
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.UpperLower
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.order.upper_lower from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1abe23ae96fef89ad30d9f4362c307f72a55010"
/-!
# Upper/lower/order-connected sets in normed groups
The topological closure and interior of an upper/lower/order-connected set is an
upper/lower/order-connected set (with the notable exception of the closure of an order-connected
set).
We also prove lemmas specific to `ℝⁿ`. Those are helpful to prove that order-connected sets in `ℝⁿ`
are measurable.
## TODO
Is there a way to generalise `IsClosed.upperClosure_pi`/`IsClosed.lowerClosure_pi` so that they also
apply to `ℝ`, `ℝ × ℝ`, `EuclideanSpace ι ℝ`? `_pi` has been appended to their names to disambiguate
from the other possible lemmas, but we will want there to be a single set of lemmas for all
situations.
-/
open Bornology Function Metric Set
open scoped Pointwise
variable {α ι : Type*}
section NormedOrderedGroup
variable [NormedOrderedGroup α] {s : Set α}
@[to_additive IsUpperSet.thickening]
protected theorem IsUpperSet.thickening' (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsUpperSet (thickening ε s) := by
rw [← ball_mul_one]
exact hs.mul_left
#align is_upper_set.thickening' IsUpperSet.thickening'
#align is_upper_set.thickening IsUpperSet.thickening
@[to_additive IsLowerSet.thickening]
protected theorem IsLowerSet.thickening' (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsLowerSet (thickening ε s) := by
rw [← ball_mul_one]
exact hs.mul_left
#align is_lower_set.thickening' IsLowerSet.thickening'
#align is_lower_set.thickening IsLowerSet.thickening
@[to_additive IsUpperSet.cthickening]
protected theorem IsUpperSet.cthickening' (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsUpperSet (cthickening ε s) := by
rw [cthickening_eq_iInter_thickening'']
exact isUpperSet_iInter₂ fun δ _ => hs.thickening' _
#align is_upper_set.cthickening' IsUpperSet.cthickening'
#align is_upper_set.cthickening IsUpperSet.cthickening
@[to_additive IsLowerSet.cthickening]
protected theorem IsLowerSet.cthickening' (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ε : ℝ) :
IsLowerSet (cthickening ε s) := by
rw [cthickening_eq_iInter_thickening'']
exact isLowerSet_iInter₂ fun δ _ => hs.thickening' _
#align is_lower_set.cthickening' IsLowerSet.cthickening'
#align is_lower_set.cthickening IsLowerSet.cthickening
@[to_additive upperClosure_interior_subset] lemma upperClosure_interior_subset' (s : Set α) :
(upperClosure (interior s) : Set α) ⊆ interior (upperClosure s) :=
upperClosure_min (interior_mono subset_upperClosure) (upperClosure s).upper.interior
#align upper_closure_interior_subset' upperClosure_interior_subset'
#align upper_closure_interior_subset upperClosure_interior_subset
@[to_additive lowerClosure_interior_subset] lemma lowerClosure_interior_subset' (s : Set α) :
(lowerClosure (interior s) : Set α) ⊆ interior (lowerClosure s) :=
lowerClosure_min (interior_mono subset_lowerClosure) (lowerClosure s).lower.interior
#align lower_closure_interior_subset' lowerClosure_interior_subset'
#align lower_closure_interior_subset lowerClosure_interior_subset
end NormedOrderedGroup
/-! ### `ℝⁿ` -/
section Finite
variable [Finite ι] {s : Set (ι → ℝ)} {x y : ι → ℝ}
theorem IsUpperSet.mem_interior_of_forall_lt (hs : IsUpperSet s) (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(h : ∀ i, x i < y i) : y ∈ interior s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hxy⟩ := Pi.exists_forall_pos_add_lt h
obtain ⟨z, hz, hxz⟩ := Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 hx _ hε
rw [dist_pi_lt_iff hε] at hxz
have hyz : ∀ i, z i < y i := by
refine fun i => (hxy _).trans_le' (sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 <| (le_abs_self _).trans ?_)
rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← dist_eq_norm']
exact (hxz _).le
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, hyz⟩ := Pi.exists_forall_pos_add_lt hyz
refine mem_interior.2 ⟨ball y δ, ?_, isOpen_ball, mem_ball_self hδ⟩
rintro w hw
refine hs (fun i => ?_) hz
simp_rw [ball_pi _ hδ, Real.ball_eq_Ioo] at hw
exact ((lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 <| hyz _).trans (hw _ <| mem_univ _).1).le
#align is_upper_set.mem_interior_of_forall_lt IsUpperSet.mem_interior_of_forall_lt
theorem IsLowerSet.mem_interior_of_forall_lt (hs : IsLowerSet s) (hx : x ∈ closure s)
(h : ∀ i, y i < x i) : y ∈ interior s := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
obtain ⟨ε, hε, hxy⟩ := Pi.exists_forall_pos_add_lt h
obtain ⟨z, hz, hxz⟩ := Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 hx _ hε
rw [dist_pi_lt_iff hε] at hxz
have hyz : ∀ i, y i < z i := by
refine fun i =>
(lt_sub_iff_add_lt.2 <| hxy _).trans_le (sub_le_comm.1 <| (le_abs_self _).trans ?_)
rw [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact (hxz _).le
obtain ⟨δ, hδ, hyz⟩ := Pi.exists_forall_pos_add_lt hyz
refine mem_interior.2 ⟨ball y δ, ?_, isOpen_ball, mem_ball_self hδ⟩
rintro w hw
refine hs (fun i => ?_) hz
simp_rw [ball_pi _ hδ, Real.ball_eq_Ioo] at hw
exact ((hw _ <| mem_univ _).2.trans <| hyz _).le
#align is_lower_set.mem_interior_of_forall_lt IsLowerSet.mem_interior_of_forall_lt
end Finite
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι] {s t : Set (ι → ℝ)} {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ x y : ι → ℝ} {δ : ℝ}
-- TODO: Generalise those lemmas so that they also apply to `ℝ` and `EuclideanSpace ι ℝ`
lemma dist_inf_sup_pi (x y : ι → ℝ) : dist (x ⊓ y) (x ⊔ y) = dist x y := by
refine' congr_arg NNReal.toReal (Finset.sup_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ _)
simp only [Real.nndist_eq', sup_eq_max, inf_eq_min, max_sub_min_eq_abs, Pi.inf_apply,
Pi.sup_apply, Real.nnabs_of_nonneg, abs_nonneg, Real.toNNReal_abs]
#align dist_inf_sup dist_inf_sup_pi
lemma dist_mono_left_pi : MonotoneOn (dist · y) (Ici y) := by
refine' fun y₁ hy₁ y₂ hy₂ hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _ ↦ _)
rw [Real.nndist_eq, Real.nnabs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (‹y ≤ _› i : y i ≤ y₁ i)),
Real.nndist_eq, Real.nnabs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (‹y ≤ _› i : y i ≤ y₂ i))]
exact Real.toNNReal_mono (sub_le_sub_right (hy _) _)
#align dist_mono_left dist_mono_left_pi
lemma dist_mono_right_pi : MonotoneOn (dist x) (Ici x) := by
simpa only [dist_comm _ x] using dist_mono_left_pi (y := x)
#align dist_mono_right dist_mono_right_pi
lemma dist_anti_left_pi : AntitoneOn (dist · y) (Iic y) := by
refine' fun y₁ hy₁ y₂ hy₂ hy ↦ NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 (Finset.sup_mono_fun fun i _ ↦ _)
rw [Real.nndist_eq', Real.nnabs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (‹_ ≤ y› i : y₂ i ≤ y i)),
Real.nndist_eq', Real.nnabs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (‹_ ≤ y› i : y₁ i ≤ y i))]
exact Real.toNNReal_mono (sub_le_sub_left (hy _) _)
#align dist_anti_left dist_anti_left_pi
lemma dist_anti_right_pi : AntitoneOn (dist x) (Iic x) := by
simpa only [dist_comm] using dist_anti_left_pi (y := x)
#align dist_anti_right dist_anti_right_pi
lemma dist_le_dist_of_le_pi (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
dist a₁ b₁ ≤ dist a₂ b₂ :=
(dist_mono_right_pi h₁ (h₁.trans hb) hb).trans $
dist_anti_left_pi (ha.trans $ h₁.trans hb) (h₁.trans hb) ha
#align dist_le_dist_of_le dist_le_dist_of_le_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Order/UpperLower.lean | 171 | 187 | theorem IsUpperSet.exists_subset_ball (hs : IsUpperSet s) (hx : x ∈ closure s) (hδ : 0 < δ) :
∃ y, closedBall y (δ / 4) ⊆ closedBall x δ ∧ closedBall y (δ / 4) ⊆ interior s := by |
refine ⟨x + const _ (3 / 4 * δ), closedBall_subset_closedBall' ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [dist_self_add_left]
refine (add_le_add_left (pi_norm_const_le <| 3 / 4 * δ) _).trans_eq ?_
simp only [norm_mul, norm_div, Real.norm_eq_abs]
simp only [gt_iff_lt, zero_lt_three, abs_of_pos, zero_lt_four, abs_of_pos hδ]
ring
obtain ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ := Metric.mem_closure_iff.1 hx _ (div_pos hδ zero_lt_four)
refine fun z hz => hs.mem_interior_of_forall_lt (subset_closure hy) fun i => ?_
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm'] at hz
rw [dist_eq_norm] at hxy
replace hxy := (norm_le_pi_norm _ i).trans hxy.le
replace hz := (norm_le_pi_norm _ i).trans hz
dsimp at hxy hz
rw [abs_sub_le_iff] at hxy hz
linarith
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
#align_import geometry.manifold.local_invariant_properties from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"431589bce478b2229eba14b14a283250428217db"
/-!
# Local properties invariant under a groupoid
We study properties of a triple `(g, s, x)` where `g` is a function between two spaces `H` and `H'`,
`s` is a subset of `H` and `x` is a point of `H`. Our goal is to register how such a property
should behave to make sense in charted spaces modelled on `H` and `H'`.
The main examples we have in mind are the properties "`g` is differentiable at `x` within `s`", or
"`g` is smooth at `x` within `s`". We want to develop general results that, when applied in these
specific situations, say that the notion of smooth function in a manifold behaves well under
restriction, intersection, is local, and so on.
## Main definitions
* `LocalInvariantProp G G' P` says that a property `P` of a triple `(g, s, x)` is local, and
invariant under composition by elements of the groupoids `G` and `G'` of `H` and `H'`
respectively.
* `ChartedSpace.LiftPropWithinAt` (resp. `LiftPropAt`, `LiftPropOn` and `LiftProp`):
given a property `P` of `(g, s, x)` where `g : H → H'`, define the corresponding property
for functions `M → M'` where `M` and `M'` are charted spaces modelled respectively on `H` and
`H'`. We define these properties within a set at a point, or at a point, or on a set, or in the
whole space. This lifting process (obtained by restricting to suitable chart domains) can always
be done, but it only behaves well under locality and invariance assumptions.
Given `hG : LocalInvariantProp G G' P`, we deduce many properties of the lifted property on the
charted spaces. For instance, `hG.liftPropWithinAt_inter` says that `P g s x` is equivalent to
`P g (s ∩ t) x` whenever `t` is a neighborhood of `x`.
## Implementation notes
We do not use dot notation for properties of the lifted property. For instance, we have
`hG.liftPropWithinAt_congr` saying that if `LiftPropWithinAt P g s x` holds, and `g` and `g'`
coincide on `s`, then `LiftPropWithinAt P g' s x` holds. We can't call it
`LiftPropWithinAt.congr` as it is in the namespace associated to `LocalInvariantProp`, not
in the one for `LiftPropWithinAt`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Manifold Topology
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {H M H' M' X : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
variable [TopologicalSpace H'] [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable (G : StructureGroupoid H) (G' : StructureGroupoid H')
/-- Structure recording good behavior of a property of a triple `(f, s, x)` where `f` is a function,
`s` a set and `x` a point. Good behavior here means locality and invariance under given groupoids
(both in the source and in the target). Given such a good behavior, the lift of this property
to charted spaces admitting these groupoids will inherit the good behavior. -/
structure LocalInvariantProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) : Prop where
is_local : ∀ {s x u} {f : H → H'}, IsOpen u → x ∈ u → (P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x)
right_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H},
e ∈ G → x ∈ e.source → P f s x → P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x)
congr_of_forall : ∀ {s x} {f g : H → H'}, (∀ y ∈ s, f y = g y) → f x = g x → P f s x → P g s x
left_invariance' : ∀ {s x f} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'},
e' ∈ G' → s ⊆ f ⁻¹' e'.source → f x ∈ e'.source → P f s x → P (e' ∘ f) s x
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp
variable {G G'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {s t u : Set H} {x : H}
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
namespace LocalInvariantProp
theorem congr_set {s t : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) : P f s x ↔ P f t x := by
obtain ⟨o, host, ho, hxo⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp hu.mem_iff
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_setOf, ← and_congr_left_iff, ← mem_inter_iff, ← Set.ext_iff] at host
rw [hG.is_local ho hxo, host, ← hG.is_local ho hxo]
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr_set StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr_set
theorem is_local_nhds {s u : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} (hu : u ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
P f s x ↔ P f (s ∩ u) x :=
hG.congr_set <| mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq.mp hu
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.is_local_nhds StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.is_local_nhds
theorem congr_iff_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g)
(h2 : f x = g x) : P f s x ↔ P g s x := by
simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h1]
exact ⟨hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2) h2, hG.congr_of_forall (fun y hy ↦ hy.2.symm) h2.symm⟩
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr_iff_nhds_within StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr_iff_nhdsWithin
theorem congr_nhdsWithin {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mp hP
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr_nhds_within StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr_nhdsWithin
theorem congr_nhdsWithin' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h1 : f =ᶠ[𝓝[s] x] g) (h2 : f x = g x)
(hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
(hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin h1 h2).mpr hP
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr_nhds_within' StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr_nhdsWithin'
theorem congr_iff {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : P f s x ↔ P g s x :=
hG.congr_iff_nhdsWithin (mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds h) (mem_of_mem_nhds h : _)
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr_iff StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr_iff
theorem congr {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P f s x) : P g s x :=
(hG.congr_iff h).mp hP
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr
theorem congr' {s : Set H} {x : H} {f g : H → H'} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) (hP : P g s x) : P f s x :=
hG.congr h.symm hP
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.congr' StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.congr'
theorem left_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'}
(he' : e' ∈ G') (hfs : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hxe' : f x ∈ e'.source) :
P (e' ∘ f) s x ↔ P f s x := by
have h2f := hfs.preimage_mem_nhdsWithin (e'.open_source.mem_nhds hxe')
have h3f :=
((e'.continuousAt hxe').comp_continuousWithinAt hfs).preimage_mem_nhdsWithin <|
e'.symm.open_source.mem_nhds <| e'.mapsTo hxe'
constructor
· intro h
rw [hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h
have h2 := hG.left_invariance' (G'.symm he') inter_subset_right (e'.mapsTo hxe') h
rw [← hG.is_local_nhds h3f] at h2
refine hG.congr_nhdsWithin ?_ (e'.left_inv hxe') h2
exact eventually_of_mem h2f fun x' ↦ e'.left_inv
· simp_rw [hG.is_local_nhds h2f]
exact hG.left_invariance' he' inter_subset_right hxe'
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.left_invariance StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.left_invariance
theorem right_invariance {s : Set H} {x : H} {f : H → H'} {e : PartialHomeomorph H H} (he : e ∈ G)
(hxe : x ∈ e.source) : P (f ∘ e.symm) (e.symm ⁻¹' s) (e x) ↔ P f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, hG.right_invariance' he hxe⟩
have := hG.right_invariance' (G.symm he) (e.mapsTo hxe) h
rw [e.symm_symm, e.left_inv hxe] at this
refine hG.congr ?_ ((hG.congr_set ?_).mp this)
· refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, e.left_inv hx']
· rw [eventuallyEq_set]
refine eventually_of_mem (e.open_source.mem_nhds hxe) fun x' hx' ↦ ?_
simp_rw [mem_preimage, e.left_inv hx']
#align structure_groupoid.local_invariant_prop.right_invariance StructureGroupoid.LocalInvariantProp.right_invariance
end LocalInvariantProp
end StructureGroupoid
namespace ChartedSpace
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property in a charted space, by requiring that it holds at the preferred chart at
this point. (When the property is local and invariant, it will in fact hold using any chart, see
`liftPropWithinAt_indep_chart`). We require continuity in the lifted property, as otherwise one
single chart might fail to capture the behavior of the function.
-/
@[mk_iff liftPropWithinAt_iff']
structure LiftPropWithinAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) (x : M) :
Prop where
continuousWithinAt : ContinuousWithinAt f s x
prop : P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x)
#align charted_space.lift_prop_within_at ChartedSpace.LiftPropWithinAt
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of functions on sets in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
around each point of the set, in the preferred charts. -/
def LiftPropOn (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (s : Set M) :=
∀ x ∈ s, LiftPropWithinAt P f s x
#align charted_space.lift_prop_on ChartedSpace.LiftPropOn
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function at a point in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart. -/
def LiftPropAt (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') (x : M) :=
LiftPropWithinAt P f univ x
#align charted_space.lift_prop_at ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt
theorem liftPropAt_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} {x : M} :
LiftPropAt P f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
rw [LiftPropAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', continuousWithinAt_univ, preimage_univ]
#align charted_space.lift_prop_at_iff ChartedSpace.liftPropAt_iff
/-- Given a property of germs of functions and sets in the model space, then one defines
a corresponding property of a function in a charted space, by requiring that it holds
in the preferred chart around every point. -/
def LiftProp (P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop) (f : M → M') :=
∀ x, LiftPropAt P f x
#align charted_space.lift_prop ChartedSpace.LiftProp
theorem liftProp_iff {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {f : M → M'} :
LiftProp P f ↔
Continuous f ∧ ∀ x, P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) univ (chartAt H x x) := by
simp_rw [LiftProp, liftPropAt_iff, forall_and, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
#align charted_space.lift_prop_iff ChartedSpace.liftProp_iff
end ChartedSpace
open ChartedSpace
namespace StructureGroupoid
variable {G : StructureGroupoid H} {G' : StructureGroupoid H'} {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H}
{f f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {P : (H → H') → Set H → H → Prop} {g g' : M → M'} {s t : Set M}
{x : M} {Q : (H → H) → Set H → H → Prop}
theorem liftPropWithinAt_univ : LiftPropWithinAt P g univ x ↔ LiftPropAt P g x := Iff.rfl
#align structure_groupoid.lift_prop_within_at_univ StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_univ
theorem liftPropOn_univ : LiftPropOn P g univ ↔ LiftProp P g := by
simp [LiftPropOn, LiftProp, LiftPropAt]
#align structure_groupoid.lift_prop_on_univ StructureGroupoid.liftPropOn_univ
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self {f : H → H'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P f s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
#align structure_groupoid.lift_prop_within_at_self StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_source {f : H → M'} {s : Set H} {x : H} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f) s x :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
#align structure_groupoid.lift_prop_within_at_self_source StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_source
theorem liftPropWithinAt_self_target {f : M → H'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm) ((chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' s) (chartAt H x x) :=
liftPropWithinAt_iff' ..
#align structure_groupoid.lift_prop_within_at_self_target StructureGroupoid.liftPropWithinAt_self_target
namespace LocalInvariantProp
variable (hG : G.LocalInvariantProp G' P)
/-- `LiftPropWithinAt P f s x` is equivalent to a definition where we restrict the set we are
considering to the domain of the charts at `x` and `f x`. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/LocalInvariantProperties.lean | 243 | 252 | theorem liftPropWithinAt_iff {f : M → M'} :
LiftPropWithinAt P f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
P (chartAt H' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (chartAt H x).symm)
((chartAt H x).target ∩ (chartAt H x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (chartAt H' (f x)).source))
(chartAt H x x) := by |
rw [liftPropWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr_right fun hf ↦ hG.congr_set ?_
exact PartialHomeomorph.preimage_eventuallyEq_target_inter_preimage_inter hf
(mem_chart_source H x) (chart_source_mem_nhds H' (f x))
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 . All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.ConjAct
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.SpecificGroups.Cyclic
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import group_theory.p_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# p-groups
This file contains a proof that if `G` is a `p`-group acting on a finite set `α`,
then the number of fixed points of the action is congruent mod `p` to the cardinality of `α`.
It also contains proofs of some corollaries of this lemma about existence of fixed points.
-/
open Fintype MulAction
variable (p : ℕ) (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- A p-group is a group in which every element has prime power order -/
def IsPGroup : Prop :=
∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, g ^ p ^ k = 1
#align is_p_group IsPGroup
variable {p} {G}
namespace IsPGroup
theorem iff_orderOf [hp : Fact p.Prime] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∀ g : G, ∃ k : ℕ, orderOf g = p ^ k :=
forall_congr' fun g =>
⟨fun ⟨k, hk⟩ =>
Exists.imp (fun _ h => h.right)
((Nat.dvd_prime_pow hp.out).mp (orderOf_dvd_of_pow_eq_one hk)),
Exists.imp fun k hk => by rw [← hk, pow_orderOf_eq_one]⟩
#align is_p_group.iff_order_of IsPGroup.iff_orderOf
theorem of_card [Fintype G] {n : ℕ} (hG : card G = p ^ n) : IsPGroup p G := fun g =>
⟨n, by rw [← hG, pow_card_eq_one]⟩
#align is_p_group.of_card IsPGroup.of_card
theorem of_bot : IsPGroup p (⊥ : Subgroup G) :=
of_card (by rw [← Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Subgroup.card_bot, pow_zero])
#align is_p_group.of_bot IsPGroup.of_bot
theorem iff_card [Fact p.Prime] [Fintype G] : IsPGroup p G ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, card G = p ^ n := by
have hG : card G ≠ 0 := card_ne_zero
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨n, hn⟩ => of_card hn⟩
suffices ∀ q ∈ Nat.factors (card G), q = p by
use (card G).factors.length
rw [← List.prod_replicate, ← List.eq_replicate_of_mem this, Nat.prod_factors hG]
intro q hq
obtain ⟨hq1, hq2⟩ := (Nat.mem_factors hG).mp hq
haveI : Fact q.Prime := ⟨hq1⟩
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_prime_orderOf_dvd_card q hq2
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := (iff_orderOf.mp h) g
exact (hq1.pow_eq_iff.mp (hg.symm.trans hk).symm).1.symm
#align is_p_group.iff_card IsPGroup.iff_card
alias ⟨exists_card_eq, _⟩ := iff_card
section GIsPGroup
variable (hG : IsPGroup p G)
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/PGroup.lean | 74 | 77 | theorem of_injective {H : Type*} [Group H] (ϕ : H →* G) (hϕ : Function.Injective ϕ) :
IsPGroup p H := by |
simp_rw [IsPGroup, ← hϕ.eq_iff, ϕ.map_pow, ϕ.map_one]
exact fun h => hG (ϕ h)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Nathaniel Thomas. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.End
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.SMulWithZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Units
#align_import algebra.module.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"30413fc89f202a090a54d78e540963ed3de0056e"
/-!
# Modules over a ring
In this file we define
* `Module R M` : an additive commutative monoid `M` is a `Module` over a
`Semiring R` if for `r : R` and `x : M` their "scalar multiplication" `r • x : M` is defined, and
the operation `•` satisfies some natural associativity and distributivity axioms similar to those
on a ring.
## Implementation notes
In typical mathematical usage, our definition of `Module` corresponds to "semimodule", and the
word "module" is reserved for `Module R M` where `R` is a `Ring` and `M` an `AddCommGroup`.
If `R` is a `Field` and `M` an `AddCommGroup`, `M` would be called an `R`-vector space.
Since those assumptions can be made by changing the typeclasses applied to `R` and `M`,
without changing the axioms in `Module`, mathlib calls everything a `Module`.
In older versions of mathlib3, we had separate abbreviations for semimodules and vector spaces.
This caused inference issues in some cases, while not providing any real advantages, so we decided
to use a canonical `Module` typeclass throughout.
## Tags
semimodule, module, vector space
-/
assert_not_exists Multiset
assert_not_exists Set.indicator
assert_not_exists Pi.single_smul₀
open Function Set
universe u v
variable {α R k S M M₂ M₃ ι : Type*}
/-- A module is a generalization of vector spaces to a scalar semiring.
It consists of a scalar semiring `R` and an additive monoid of "vectors" `M`,
connected by a "scalar multiplication" operation `r • x : M`
(where `r : R` and `x : M`) with some natural associativity and
distributivity axioms similar to those on a ring. -/
@[ext]
class Module (R : Type u) (M : Type v) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] extends
DistribMulAction R M where
/-- Scalar multiplication distributes over addition from the right. -/
protected add_smul : ∀ (r s : R) (x : M), (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x
/-- Scalar multiplication by zero gives zero. -/
protected zero_smul : ∀ x : M, (0 : R) • x = 0
#align module Module
#align module.ext Module.ext
#align module.ext_iff Module.ext_iff
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] (r s : R) (x y : M)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A module over a semiring automatically inherits a `MulActionWithZero` structure. -/
instance (priority := 100) Module.toMulActionWithZero : MulActionWithZero R M :=
{ (inferInstance : MulAction R M) with
smul_zero := smul_zero
zero_smul := Module.zero_smul }
#align module.to_mul_action_with_zero Module.toMulActionWithZero
instance AddCommMonoid.natModule : Module ℕ M where
one_smul := one_nsmul
mul_smul m n a := mul_nsmul' a m n
smul_add n a b := nsmul_add a b n
smul_zero := nsmul_zero
zero_smul := zero_nsmul
add_smul r s x := add_nsmul x r s
#align add_comm_monoid.nat_module AddCommMonoid.natModule
theorem AddMonoid.End.natCast_def (n : ℕ) :
(↑n : AddMonoid.End M) = DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd ℕ M n :=
rfl
#align add_monoid.End.nat_cast_def AddMonoid.End.natCast_def
theorem add_smul : (r + s) • x = r • x + s • x :=
Module.add_smul r s x
#align add_smul add_smul
theorem Convex.combo_self {a b : R} (h : a + b = 1) (x : M) : a • x + b • x = x := by
rw [← add_smul, h, one_smul]
#align convex.combo_self Convex.combo_self
variable (R)
-- Porting note: this is the letter of the mathlib3 version, but not really the spirit
theorem two_smul : (2 : R) • x = x + x := by rw [← one_add_one_eq_two, add_smul, one_smul]
#align two_smul two_smul
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated]
theorem two_smul' : (2 : R) • x = bit0 x :=
two_smul R x
#align two_smul' two_smul'
@[simp]
theorem invOf_two_smul_add_invOf_two_smul [Invertible (2 : R)] (x : M) :
(⅟ 2 : R) • x + (⅟ 2 : R) • x = x :=
Convex.combo_self invOf_two_add_invOf_two _
#align inv_of_two_smul_add_inv_of_two_smul invOf_two_smul_add_invOf_two_smul
/-- Pullback a `Module` structure along an injective additive monoid homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.module [AddCommMonoid M₂] [SMul R M₂] (f : M₂ →+ M)
(hf : Injective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : Module R M₂ :=
{ hf.distribMulAction f smul with
add_smul := fun c₁ c₂ x => hf <| by simp only [smul, f.map_add, add_smul]
zero_smul := fun x => hf <| by simp only [smul, zero_smul, f.map_zero] }
#align function.injective.module Function.Injective.module
/-- Pushforward a `Module` structure along a surjective additive monoid homomorphism.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
protected abbrev Function.Surjective.module [AddCommMonoid M₂] [SMul R M₂] (f : M →+ M₂)
(hf : Surjective f) (smul : ∀ (c : R) (x), f (c • x) = c • f x) : Module R M₂ :=
{ toDistribMulAction := hf.distribMulAction f smul
add_smul := fun c₁ c₂ x => by
rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_smul, ← smul, ← f.map_add]
zero_smul := fun x => by
rcases hf x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [← f.map_zero, ← smul, zero_smul] }
#align function.surjective.module Function.Surjective.module
/-- Push forward the action of `R` on `M` along a compatible surjective map `f : R →+* S`.
See also `Function.Surjective.mulActionLeft` and `Function.Surjective.distribMulActionLeft`.
-/
abbrev Function.Surjective.moduleLeft {R S M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
[Semiring S] [SMul S M] (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(hsmul : ∀ (c) (x : M), f c • x = c • x) : Module S M :=
{ hf.distribMulActionLeft f.toMonoidHom hsmul with
zero_smul := fun x => by rw [← f.map_zero, hsmul, zero_smul]
add_smul := hf.forall₂.mpr fun a b x => by simp only [← f.map_add, hsmul, add_smul] }
#align function.surjective.module_left Function.Surjective.moduleLeft
variable {R} (M)
/-- Compose a `Module` with a `RingHom`, with action `f s • m`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev Module.compHom [Semiring S] (f : S →+* R) : Module S M :=
{ MulActionWithZero.compHom M f.toMonoidWithZeroHom, DistribMulAction.compHom M (f : S →* R) with
-- Porting note: the `show f (r + s) • x = f r • x + f s • x` wasn't needed in mathlib3.
-- Somehow, now that `SMul` is heterogeneous, it can't unfold earlier fields of a definition for
-- use in later fields. See
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Heterogeneous.20scalar.20multiplication
add_smul := fun r s x => show f (r + s) • x = f r • x + f s • x by simp [add_smul] }
#align module.comp_hom Module.compHom
variable (R)
/-- `(•)` as an `AddMonoidHom`.
This is a stronger version of `DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd` -/
@[simps! apply_apply]
def Module.toAddMonoidEnd : R →+* AddMonoid.End M :=
{ DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd R M with
-- Porting note: the two `show`s weren't needed in mathlib3.
-- Somehow, now that `SMul` is heterogeneous, it can't unfold earlier fields of a definition for
-- use in later fields. See
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/Heterogeneous.20scalar.20multiplication
map_zero' := AddMonoidHom.ext fun r => show (0:R) • r = 0 by simp
map_add' := fun x y =>
AddMonoidHom.ext fun r => show (x + y) • r = x • r + y • r by simp [add_smul] }
#align module.to_add_monoid_End Module.toAddMonoidEnd
#align module.to_add_monoid_End_apply_apply Module.toAddMonoidEnd_apply_apply
/-- A convenience alias for `Module.toAddMonoidEnd` as an `AddMonoidHom`, usually to allow the
use of `AddMonoidHom.flip`. -/
def smulAddHom : R →+ M →+ M :=
(Module.toAddMonoidEnd R M).toAddMonoidHom
#align smul_add_hom smulAddHom
variable {R M}
@[simp]
theorem smulAddHom_apply (r : R) (x : M) : smulAddHom R M r x = r • x :=
rfl
#align smul_add_hom_apply smulAddHom_apply
theorem Module.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one (zero_eq_one : (0 : R) = 1) : x = 0 := by
rw [← one_smul R x, ← zero_eq_one, zero_smul]
#align module.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one Module.eq_zero_of_zero_eq_one
@[simp]
theorem smul_add_one_sub_smul {R : Type*} [Ring R] [Module R M] {r : R} {m : M} :
r • m + (1 - r) • m = m := by rw [← add_smul, add_sub_cancel, one_smul]
#align smul_add_one_sub_smul smul_add_one_sub_smul
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable (R M) [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M]
instance AddCommGroup.intModule : Module ℤ M where
one_smul := one_zsmul
mul_smul m n a := mul_zsmul a m n
smul_add n a b := zsmul_add a b n
smul_zero := zsmul_zero
zero_smul := zero_zsmul
add_smul r s x := add_zsmul x r s
#align add_comm_group.int_module AddCommGroup.intModule
theorem AddMonoid.End.intCast_def (z : ℤ) :
(↑z : AddMonoid.End M) = DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidEnd ℤ M z :=
rfl
#align add_monoid.End.int_cast_def AddMonoid.End.intCast_def
variable {R M}
theorem Convex.combo_eq_smul_sub_add [Module R M] {x y : M} {a b : R} (h : a + b = 1) :
a • x + b • y = b • (y - x) + x :=
calc
a • x + b • y = b • y - b • x + (a • x + b • x) := by rw [sub_add_add_cancel, add_comm]
_ = b • (y - x) + x := by rw [smul_sub, Convex.combo_self h]
#align convex.combo_eq_smul_sub_add Convex.combo_eq_smul_sub_add
end AddCommGroup
-- We'll later use this to show `Module ℕ M` and `Module ℤ M` are subsingletons.
/-- A variant of `Module.ext` that's convenient for term-mode. -/
theorem Module.ext' {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (P Q : Module R M)
(w : ∀ (r : R) (m : M), (haveI := P; r • m) = (haveI := Q; r • m)) :
P = Q := by
ext
exact w _ _
#align module.ext' Module.ext'
section Module
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (r s : R) (x y : M)
@[simp]
theorem neg_smul : -r • x = -(r • x) :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by rw [← add_smul, add_left_neg, zero_smul]
#align neg_smul neg_smul
-- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
--@[simp]
theorem neg_smul_neg : -r • -x = r • x := by rw [neg_smul, smul_neg, neg_neg]
#align neg_smul_neg neg_smul_neg
@[simp]
theorem Units.neg_smul (u : Rˣ) (x : M) : -u • x = -(u • x) := by
rw [Units.smul_def, Units.val_neg, _root_.neg_smul, Units.smul_def]
#align units.neg_smul Units.neg_smul
variable (R)
theorem neg_one_smul (x : M) : (-1 : R) • x = -x := by simp
#align neg_one_smul neg_one_smul
variable {R}
theorem sub_smul (r s : R) (y : M) : (r - s) • y = r • y - s • y := by
simp [add_smul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align sub_smul sub_smul
end Module
variable (R)
/-- An `AddCommMonoid` that is a `Module` over a `Ring` carries a natural `AddCommGroup`
structure.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev Module.addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup
[Ring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] : AddCommGroup M :=
{ (inferInstance : AddCommMonoid M) with
neg := fun a => (-1 : R) • a
add_left_neg := fun a =>
show (-1 : R) • a + a = 0 by
nth_rw 2 [← one_smul R a]
rw [← add_smul, add_left_neg, zero_smul]
zsmul := fun z a => (z : R) • a
zsmul_zero' := fun a => by simpa only [Int.cast_zero] using zero_smul R a
zsmul_succ' := fun z a => by simp [add_comm, add_smul]
zsmul_neg' := fun z a => by simp [← smul_assoc, neg_one_smul] }
#align module.add_comm_monoid_to_add_comm_group Module.addCommMonoidToAddCommGroup
variable {R}
/-- A module over a `Subsingleton` semiring is a `Subsingleton`. We cannot register this
as an instance because Lean has no way to guess `R`. -/
protected theorem Module.subsingleton (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [Subsingleton R] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] : Subsingleton M :=
MulActionWithZero.subsingleton R M
#align module.subsingleton Module.subsingleton
/-- A semiring is `Nontrivial` provided that there exists a nontrivial module over this semiring. -/
protected theorem Module.nontrivial (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [Nontrivial M] [AddCommMonoid M]
[Module R M] : Nontrivial R :=
MulActionWithZero.nontrivial R M
#align module.nontrivial Module.nontrivial
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 910) Semiring.toModule [Semiring R] : Module R R where
smul_add := mul_add
add_smul := add_mul
zero_smul := zero_mul
smul_zero := mul_zero
#align semiring.to_module Semiring.toModule
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- Like `Semiring.toModule`, but multiplies on the right. -/
instance (priority := 910) Semiring.toOppositeModule [Semiring R] : Module Rᵐᵒᵖ R :=
{ MonoidWithZero.toOppositeMulActionWithZero R with
smul_add := fun _ _ _ => add_mul _ _ _
add_smul := fun _ _ _ => mul_add _ _ _ }
#align semiring.to_opposite_module Semiring.toOppositeModule
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : R →+* M` defines a module structure by `r • x = f r * x`. -/
def RingHom.toModule [Semiring R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) : Module R S :=
Module.compHom S f
#align ring_hom.to_module RingHom.toModule
/-- If the module action of `R` on `S` is compatible with multiplication on `S`, then
`fun x ↦ x • 1` is a ring homomorphism from `R` to `S`.
This is the `RingHom` version of `MonoidHom.smulOneHom`.
When `R` is commutative, usually `algebraMap` should be preferred. -/
@[simps!] def RingHom.smulOneHom
[Semiring R] [NonAssocSemiring S] [Module R S] [IsScalarTower R S S] : R →+* S where
__ := MonoidHom.smulOneHom
map_zero' := zero_smul R 1
map_add' := (add_smul · · 1)
/-- A homomorphism between semirings R and S can be equivalently specified by a R-module
structure on S such that S/S/R is a scalar tower. -/
def ringHomEquivModuleIsScalarTower [Semiring R] [Semiring S] :
(R →+* S) ≃ {_inst : Module R S // IsScalarTower R S S} where
toFun f := ⟨Module.compHom S f, SMul.comp.isScalarTower _⟩
invFun := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ RingHom.smulOneHom
left_inv f := RingHom.ext fun r ↦ mul_one (f r)
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ↦ Subtype.ext <| Module.ext _ _ <| funext₂ <| smul_one_smul S
section AddCommMonoid
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
section
variable (R)
/-- `nsmul` is equal to any other module structure via a cast. -/
theorem nsmul_eq_smul_cast (n : ℕ) (b : M) : n • b = (n : R) • b := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_smul, zero_smul]
· rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_smul, add_smul, one_smul, ih, one_smul]
#align nsmul_eq_smul_cast nsmul_eq_smul_cast
end
/-- Convert back any exotic `ℕ`-smul to the canonical instance. This should not be needed since in
mathlib all `AddCommMonoid`s should normally have exactly one `ℕ`-module structure by design.
-/
theorem nat_smul_eq_nsmul (h : Module ℕ M) (n : ℕ) (x : M) :
@SMul.smul ℕ M h.toSMul n x = n • x := by rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast ℕ n x, Nat.cast_id]; rfl
#align nat_smul_eq_nsmul nat_smul_eq_nsmul
/-- All `ℕ`-module structures are equal. Not an instance since in mathlib all `AddCommMonoid`
should normally have exactly one `ℕ`-module structure by design. -/
def AddCommMonoid.natModule.unique : Unique (Module ℕ M) where
default := by infer_instance
uniq P := (Module.ext' P _) fun n => by convert nat_smul_eq_nsmul P n
#align add_comm_monoid.nat_module.unique AddCommMonoid.natModule.unique
instance AddCommMonoid.nat_isScalarTower : IsScalarTower ℕ R M where
smul_assoc n x y :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp only [Nat.zero_eq, zero_smul])
fun n ih => by simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_smul, one_smul, ih]
#align add_comm_monoid.nat_is_scalar_tower AddCommMonoid.nat_isScalarTower
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable [Semiring S] [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module S M] [Module R M]
section
variable (R)
/-- `zsmul` is equal to any other module structure via a cast. -/
theorem zsmul_eq_smul_cast (n : ℤ) (b : M) : n • b = (n : R) • b :=
have : (smulAddHom ℤ M).flip b = ((smulAddHom R M).flip b).comp (Int.castAddHom R) := by
apply AddMonoidHom.ext_int
simp
DFunLike.congr_fun this n
#align zsmul_eq_smul_cast zsmul_eq_smul_cast
end
/-- Convert back any exotic `ℤ`-smul to the canonical instance. This should not be needed since in
mathlib all `AddCommGroup`s should normally have exactly one `ℤ`-module structure by design. -/
theorem int_smul_eq_zsmul (h : Module ℤ M) (n : ℤ) (x : M) :
@SMul.smul ℤ M h.toSMul n x = n • x := by rw [zsmul_eq_smul_cast ℤ n x, Int.cast_id]; rfl
#align int_smul_eq_zsmul int_smul_eq_zsmul
/-- All `ℤ`-module structures are equal. Not an instance since in mathlib all `AddCommGroup`
should normally have exactly one `ℤ`-module structure by design. -/
def AddCommGroup.intModule.unique : Unique (Module ℤ M) where
default := by infer_instance
uniq P := (Module.ext' P _) fun n => by convert int_smul_eq_zsmul P n
#align add_comm_group.int_module.unique AddCommGroup.intModule.unique
end AddCommGroup
theorem map_intCast_smul [AddCommGroup M] [AddCommGroup M₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂]
[AddMonoidHomClass F M M₂] (f : F) (R S : Type*) [Ring R] [Ring S] [Module R M] [Module S M₂]
(x : ℤ) (a : M) :
f ((x : R) • a) = (x : S) • f a := by simp only [← zsmul_eq_smul_cast, map_zsmul]
#align map_int_cast_smul map_intCast_smul
theorem map_natCast_smul [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid M₂] {F : Type*} [FunLike F M M₂]
[AddMonoidHomClass F M M₂] (f : F) (R S : Type*) [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [Module R M]
[Module S M₂] (x : ℕ) (a : M) : f ((x : R) • a) = (x : S) • f a := by
simp only [← nsmul_eq_smul_cast, AddMonoidHom.map_nsmul, map_nsmul]
#align map_nat_cast_smul map_natCast_smul
instance AddCommGroup.intIsScalarTower {R : Type u} {M : Type v} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M]
[Module R M] : IsScalarTower ℤ R M where
smul_assoc n x y := ((smulAddHom R M).flip y).map_zsmul x n
#align add_comm_group.int_is_scalar_tower AddCommGroup.intIsScalarTower
section NoZeroSMulDivisors
/-! ### `NoZeroSMulDivisors`
This section defines the `NoZeroSMulDivisors` class, and includes some tests
for the vanishing of elements (especially in modules over division rings).
-/
/-- `NoZeroSMulDivisors R M` states that a scalar multiple is `0` only if either argument is `0`.
This is a version of saying that `M` is torsion free, without assuming `R` is zero-divisor free.
The main application of `NoZeroSMulDivisors R M`, when `M` is a module,
is the result `smul_eq_zero`: a scalar multiple is `0` iff either argument is `0`.
It is a generalization of the `NoZeroDivisors` class to heterogeneous multiplication.
-/
@[mk_iff]
class NoZeroSMulDivisors (R M : Type*) [Zero R] [Zero M] [SMul R M] : Prop where
/-- If scalar multiplication yields zero, either the scalar or the vector was zero. -/
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero : ∀ {c : R} {x : M}, c • x = 0 → c = 0 ∨ x = 0
#align no_zero_smul_divisors NoZeroSMulDivisors
export NoZeroSMulDivisors (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero)
/-- Pullback a `NoZeroSMulDivisors` instance along an injective function. -/
theorem Function.Injective.noZeroSMulDivisors {R M N : Type*} [Zero R] [Zero M] [Zero N]
[SMul R M] [SMul R N] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R N] (f : M → N) (hf : Function.Injective f)
(h0 : f 0 = 0) (hs : ∀ (c : R) (x : M), f (c • x) = c • f x) : NoZeroSMulDivisors R M :=
⟨fun {_ _} h =>
Or.imp_right (@hf _ _) <| h0.symm ▸ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero (by rw [← hs, h, h0])⟩
#align function.injective.no_zero_smul_divisors Function.Injective.noZeroSMulDivisors
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) NoZeroDivisors.toNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [Mul R]
[NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R R :=
⟨fun {_ _} => eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero⟩
#align no_zero_divisors.to_no_zero_smul_divisors NoZeroDivisors.toNoZeroSMulDivisors
theorem smul_ne_zero [Zero R] [Zero M] [SMul R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {c : R} {x : M}
(hc : c ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ 0) : c • x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h).elim hc hx
#align smul_ne_zero smul_ne_zero
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero R] [Zero M] [SMulWithZero R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {c : R} {x : M}
@[simp]
theorem smul_eq_zero : c • x = 0 ↔ c = 0 ∨ x = 0 :=
⟨eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero, fun h =>
h.elim (fun h => h.symm ▸ zero_smul R x) fun h => h.symm ▸ smul_zero c⟩
#align smul_eq_zero smul_eq_zero
theorem smul_ne_zero_iff : c • x ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 ∧ x ≠ 0 := by rw [Ne, smul_eq_zero, not_or]
#align smul_ne_zero_iff smul_ne_zero_iff
lemma smul_eq_zero_iff_left (hx : x ≠ 0) : c • x = 0 ↔ c = 0 := by simp [hx]
lemma smul_eq_zero_iff_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : c • x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hc]
#align smul_eq_zero_iff_eq' smul_eq_zero_iff_right
lemma smul_ne_zero_iff_left (hx : x ≠ 0) : c • x ≠ 0 ↔ c ≠ 0 := by simp [hx]
lemma smul_ne_zero_iff_right (hc : c ≠ 0) : c • x ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 := by simp [hc]
#align smul_ne_zero_iff_ne' smul_ne_zero_iff_right
end SMulWithZero
section Module
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
section Nat
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [CharZero R]
variable (R) (M)
theorem Nat.noZeroSMulDivisors : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ M :=
⟨by
intro c x
rw [nsmul_eq_smul_cast R, smul_eq_zero]
simp⟩
#align nat.no_zero_smul_divisors Nat.noZeroSMulDivisors
-- Porting note: left-hand side never simplifies when using simp on itself
--@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero {v : M} : 2 • v = 0 ↔ v = 0 := by
haveI := Nat.noZeroSMulDivisors R M
simp [smul_eq_zero]
#align two_nsmul_eq_zero two_nsmul_eq_zero
end Nat
variable (R M)
/-- If `M` is an `R`-module with one and `M` has characteristic zero, then `R` has characteristic
zero as well. Usually `M` is an `R`-algebra. -/
theorem CharZero.of_module (M) [AddCommMonoidWithOne M] [CharZero M] [Module R M] : CharZero R := by
refine ⟨fun m n h => @Nat.cast_injective M _ _ _ _ ?_⟩
rw [← nsmul_one, ← nsmul_one, nsmul_eq_smul_cast R m (1 : M), nsmul_eq_smul_cast R n (1 : M), h]
#align char_zero.of_module CharZero.of_module
end Module
section AddCommGroup
-- `R` can still be a semiring here
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
section SMulInjective
variable (M)
theorem smul_right_injective [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective (c • · : M → M) :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero (smulAddHom R M c)).2 fun _ ha => (smul_eq_zero.mp ha).resolve_left hc
#align smul_right_injective smul_right_injective
variable {M}
theorem smul_right_inj [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] {c : R} (hc : c ≠ 0) {x y : M} :
c • x = c • y ↔ x = y :=
(smul_right_injective M hc).eq_iff
#align smul_right_inj smul_right_inj
end SMulInjective
section Nat
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] [CharZero R]
variable (R M)
theorem self_eq_neg {v : M} : v = -v ↔ v = 0 := by
rw [← two_nsmul_eq_zero R M, two_smul, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
#align self_eq_neg self_eq_neg
theorem neg_eq_self {v : M} : -v = v ↔ v = 0 := by rw [eq_comm, self_eq_neg R M]
#align neg_eq_self neg_eq_self
theorem self_ne_neg {v : M} : v ≠ -v ↔ v ≠ 0 :=
(self_eq_neg R M).not
#align self_ne_neg self_ne_neg
theorem neg_ne_self {v : M} : -v ≠ v ↔ v ≠ 0 :=
(neg_eq_self R M).not
#align neg_ne_self neg_ne_self
end Nat
end AddCommGroup
section Module
variable [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
section SMulInjective
variable (R)
theorem smul_left_injective {x : M} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun c : R => c • x :=
fun c d h =>
sub_eq_zero.mp
((smul_eq_zero.mp
(calc
(c - d) • x = c • x - d • x := sub_smul c d x
_ = 0 := sub_eq_zero.mpr h
)).resolve_right
hx)
#align smul_left_injective smul_left_injective
end SMulInjective
instance [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M] : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ M :=
⟨fun {c x} hcx ↦ by rwa [nsmul_eq_smul_cast ℤ c x, smul_eq_zero, Nat.cast_eq_zero] at hcx⟩
variable (R M)
theorem NoZeroSMulDivisors.int_of_charZero [CharZero R] : NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M :=
⟨fun {z x} h ↦ by simpa [← smul_one_smul R z x] using h⟩
/-- Only a ring of characteristic zero can can have a non-trivial module without additive or
scalar torsion. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Defs.lean | 625 | 629 | theorem CharZero.of_noZeroSMulDivisors [Nontrivial M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ M] : CharZero R := by |
refine ⟨fun {n m h} ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_ne (0 : M)
replace h : (n : ℤ) • x = (m : ℤ) • x := by simp [zsmul_eq_smul_cast R, h]
simpa using smul_left_injective ℤ hx h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Denumerable
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Interval
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Continuum
#align_import data.real.cardinality from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e7aaccf9b0182576cabdde36cf1b5ad3585b70d"
/-!
# The cardinality of the reals
This file shows that the real numbers have cardinality continuum, i.e. `#ℝ = 𝔠`.
We show that `#ℝ ≤ 𝔠` by noting that every real number is determined by a Cauchy-sequence of the
form `ℕ → ℚ`, which has cardinality `𝔠`. To show that `#ℝ ≥ 𝔠` we define an injection from
`{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` with `f ↦ Σ n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`.
We conclude that all intervals with distinct endpoints have cardinality continuum.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.cantorFunction` is the function that sends `f` in `{0, 1} ^ ℕ` to `ℝ` by
`f ↦ Σ' n, f n * (1 / 3) ^ n`
## Main statements
* `Cardinal.mk_real : #ℝ = 𝔠`: the reals have cardinality continuum.
* `Cardinal.not_countable_real`: the universal set of real numbers is not countable.
We can use this same proof to show that all the other sets in this file are not countable.
* 8 lemmas of the form `mk_Ixy_real` for `x,y ∈ {i,o,c}` state that intervals on the reals
have cardinality continuum.
## Notation
* `𝔠` : notation for `Cardinal.Continuum` in locale `Cardinal`, defined in `SetTheory.Continuum`.
## Tags
continuum, cardinality, reals, cardinality of the reals
-/
open Nat Set
open Cardinal
noncomputable section
namespace Cardinal
variable {c : ℝ} {f g : ℕ → Bool} {n : ℕ}
/-- The body of the sum in `cantorFunction`.
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n` if `f n = true`;
`cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0` if `f n = false`. -/
def cantorFunctionAux (c : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Bool) (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
cond (f n) (c ^ n) 0
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_true (h : f n = true) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = c ^ n := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_tt Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_true
@[simp]
theorem cantorFunctionAux_false (h : f n = false) : cantorFunctionAux c f n = 0 := by
simp [cantorFunctionAux, h]
#align cardinal.cantor_function_aux_ff Cardinal.cantorFunctionAux_false
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Cardinality.lean | 73 | 75 | theorem cantorFunctionAux_nonneg (h : 0 ≤ c) : 0 ≤ cantorFunctionAux c f n := by |
cases h' : f n <;> simp [h']
apply pow_nonneg h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jalex Stark, Kyle Miller, Alena Gusakov, Hunter Monroe
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Init
import Mathlib.Data.Rel
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3365b20c2ffa7c35e47e5209b89ba9abdddf3ffe"
/-!
# Simple graphs
This module defines simple graphs on a vertex type `V` as an irreflexive symmetric relation.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph` is a structure for symmetric, irreflexive relations
* `SimpleGraph.neighborSet` is the `Set` of vertices adjacent to a given vertex
* `SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors` is the intersection of the neighbor sets of two given vertices
* `SimpleGraph.incidenceSet` is the `Set` of edges containing a given vertex
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` instance: Under the subgraph relation, `SimpleGraph` forms a
`CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`. In other words, this is the complete lattice of spanning subgraphs
of the complete graph.
## Todo
* This is the simplest notion of an unoriented graph. This should
eventually fit into a more complete combinatorics hierarchy which
includes multigraphs and directed graphs. We begin with simple graphs
in order to start learning what the combinatorics hierarchy should
look like.
-/
-- Porting note: using `aesop` for automation
-- Porting note: These attributes are needed to use `aesop` as a replacement for `obviously`
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Symmetric
attribute [aesop norm unfold (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Irreflexive
-- Porting note: a thin wrapper around `aesop` for graph lemmas, modelled on `aesop_cat`
/--
A variant of the `aesop` tactic for use in the graph library. Changes relative
to standard `aesop`:
- We use the `SimpleGraph` rule set in addition to the default rule sets.
- We instruct Aesop's `intro` rule to unfold with `default` transparency.
- We instruct Aesop to fail if it can't fully solve the goal. This allows us to
use `aesop_graph` for auto-params.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph) "aesop_graph" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
Use `aesop_graph?` to pass along a `Try this` suggestion when using `aesop_graph`
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph?) "aesop_graph?" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, terminal := true })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
/--
A variant of `aesop_graph` which does not fail if it is unable to solve the
goal. Use this only for exploration! Nonterminal Aesop is even worse than
nonterminal `simp`.
-/
macro (name := aesop_graph_nonterminal) "aesop_graph_nonterminal" c:Aesop.tactic_clause* : tactic =>
`(tactic|
aesop $c*
(config := { introsTransparency? := some .default, warnOnNonterminal := false })
(rule_sets := [$(Lean.mkIdent `SimpleGraph):ident]))
open Finset Function
universe u v w
/-- A simple graph is an irreflexive symmetric relation `Adj` on a vertex type `V`.
The relation describes which pairs of vertices are adjacent.
There is exactly one edge for every pair of adjacent vertices;
see `SimpleGraph.edgeSet` for the corresponding edge set.
-/
@[ext, aesop safe constructors (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])]
structure SimpleGraph (V : Type u) where
/-- The adjacency relation of a simple graph. -/
Adj : V → V → Prop
symm : Symmetric Adj := by aesop_graph
loopless : Irreflexive Adj := by aesop_graph
#align simple_graph SimpleGraph
-- Porting note: changed `obviously` to `aesop` in the `structure`
initialize_simps_projections SimpleGraph (Adj → adj)
/-- Constructor for simple graphs using a symmetric irreflexive boolean function. -/
@[simps]
def SimpleGraph.mk' {V : Type u} :
{adj : V → V → Bool // (∀ x y, adj x y = adj y x) ∧ (∀ x, ¬ adj x x)} ↪ SimpleGraph V where
toFun x := ⟨fun v w ↦ x.1 v w, fun v w ↦ by simp [x.2.1], fun v ↦ by simp [x.2.2]⟩
inj' := by
rintro ⟨adj, _⟩ ⟨adj', _⟩
simp only [mk.injEq, Subtype.mk.injEq]
intro h
funext v w
simpa [Bool.coe_iff_coe] using congr_fun₂ h v w
/-- We can enumerate simple graphs by enumerating all functions `V → V → Bool`
and filtering on whether they are symmetric and irreflexive. -/
instance {V : Type u} [Fintype V] [DecidableEq V] : Fintype (SimpleGraph V) where
elems := Finset.univ.map SimpleGraph.mk'
complete := by
classical
rintro ⟨Adj, hs, hi⟩
simp only [mem_map, mem_univ, true_and, Subtype.exists, Bool.not_eq_true]
refine ⟨fun v w ↦ Adj v w, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· simp [hs.iff]
· intro v; simp [hi v]
· ext
simp
/-- Construct the simple graph induced by the given relation. It
symmetrizes the relation and makes it irreflexive. -/
def SimpleGraph.fromRel {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) : SimpleGraph V where
Adj a b := a ≠ b ∧ (r a b ∨ r b a)
symm := fun _ _ ⟨hn, hr⟩ => ⟨hn.symm, hr.symm⟩
loopless := fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn rfl
#align simple_graph.from_rel SimpleGraph.fromRel
@[simp]
theorem SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj {V : Type u} (r : V → V → Prop) (v w : V) :
(SimpleGraph.fromRel r).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ (r v w ∨ r w v) :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.from_rel_adj SimpleGraph.fromRel_adj
-- Porting note: attributes needed for `completeGraph`
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.symm
attribute [aesop safe (rule_sets := [SimpleGraph])] Ne.irrefl
/-- The complete graph on a type `V` is the simple graph with all pairs of distinct vertices
adjacent. In `Mathlib`, this is usually referred to as `⊤`. -/
def completeGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj := Ne
#align complete_graph completeGraph
/-- The graph with no edges on a given vertex type `V`. `Mathlib` prefers the notation `⊥`. -/
def emptyGraph (V : Type u) : SimpleGraph V where Adj _ _ := False
#align empty_graph emptyGraph
/-- Two vertices are adjacent in the complete bipartite graph on two vertex types
if and only if they are not from the same side.
Any bipartite graph may be regarded as a subgraph of one of these. -/
@[simps]
def completeBipartiteGraph (V W : Type*) : SimpleGraph (Sum V W) where
Adj v w := v.isLeft ∧ w.isRight ∨ v.isRight ∧ w.isLeft
symm v w := by cases v <;> cases w <;> simp
loopless v := by cases v <;> simp
#align complete_bipartite_graph completeBipartiteGraph
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {ι : Sort*} {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) {a b c u v w : V} {e : Sym2 V}
@[simp]
protected theorem irrefl {v : V} : ¬G.Adj v v :=
G.loopless v
#align simple_graph.irrefl SimpleGraph.irrefl
theorem adj_comm (u v : V) : G.Adj u v ↔ G.Adj v u :=
⟨fun x => G.symm x, fun x => G.symm x⟩
#align simple_graph.adj_comm SimpleGraph.adj_comm
@[symm]
theorem adj_symm (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
#align simple_graph.adj_symm SimpleGraph.adj_symm
theorem Adj.symm {G : SimpleGraph V} {u v : V} (h : G.Adj u v) : G.Adj v u :=
G.symm h
#align simple_graph.adj.symm SimpleGraph.Adj.symm
theorem ne_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b := by
rintro rfl
exact G.irrefl h
#align simple_graph.ne_of_adj SimpleGraph.ne_of_adj
protected theorem Adj.ne {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : a ≠ b :=
G.ne_of_adj h
#align simple_graph.adj.ne SimpleGraph.Adj.ne
protected theorem Adj.ne' {G : SimpleGraph V} {a b : V} (h : G.Adj a b) : b ≠ a :=
h.ne.symm
#align simple_graph.adj.ne' SimpleGraph.Adj.ne'
theorem ne_of_adj_of_not_adj {v w x : V} (h : G.Adj v x) (hn : ¬G.Adj w x) : v ≠ w := fun h' =>
hn (h' ▸ h)
#align simple_graph.ne_of_adj_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.ne_of_adj_of_not_adj
theorem adj_injective : Injective (Adj : SimpleGraph V → V → V → Prop) :=
SimpleGraph.ext
#align simple_graph.adj_injective SimpleGraph.adj_injective
@[simp]
theorem adj_inj {G H : SimpleGraph V} : G.Adj = H.Adj ↔ G = H :=
adj_injective.eq_iff
#align simple_graph.adj_inj SimpleGraph.adj_inj
section Order
/-- The relation that one `SimpleGraph` is a subgraph of another.
Note that this should be spelled `≤`. -/
def IsSubgraph (x y : SimpleGraph V) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃v w : V⦄, x.Adj v w → y.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.is_subgraph SimpleGraph.IsSubgraph
instance : LE (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨IsSubgraph⟩
@[simp]
theorem isSubgraph_eq_le : (IsSubgraph : SimpleGraph V → SimpleGraph V → Prop) = (· ≤ ·) :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.is_subgraph_eq_le SimpleGraph.isSubgraph_eq_le
/-- The supremum of two graphs `x ⊔ y` has edges where either `x` or `y` have edges. -/
instance : Sup (SimpleGraph V) where
sup x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊔ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.sup_apply, Pi.sup_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sup_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊔ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∨ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.sup_adj SimpleGraph.sup_adj
/-- The infimum of two graphs `x ⊓ y` has edges where both `x` and `y` have edges. -/
instance : Inf (SimpleGraph V) where
inf x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj ⊓ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by rwa [Pi.inf_apply, Pi.inf_apply, x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x ⊓ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.inf_adj SimpleGraph.inf_adj
/-- We define `Gᶜ` to be the `SimpleGraph V` such that no two adjacent vertices in `G`
are adjacent in the complement, and every nonadjacent pair of vertices is adjacent
(still ensuring that vertices are not adjacent to themselves). -/
instance hasCompl : HasCompl (SimpleGraph V) where
compl G :=
{ Adj := fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
symm := fun v w ⟨hne, _⟩ => ⟨hne.symm, by rwa [adj_comm]⟩
loopless := fun v ⟨hne, _⟩ => (hne rfl).elim }
@[simp]
theorem compl_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : Gᶜ.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.compl_adj SimpleGraph.compl_adj
/-- The difference of two graphs `x \ y` has the edges of `x` with the edges of `y` removed. -/
instance sdiff : SDiff (SimpleGraph V) where
sdiff x y :=
{ Adj := x.Adj \ y.Adj
symm := fun v w h => by change x.Adj w v ∧ ¬y.Adj w v; rwa [x.adj_comm, y.adj_comm] }
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_adj (x y : SimpleGraph V) (v w : V) : (x \ y).Adj v w ↔ x.Adj v w ∧ ¬y.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.sdiff_adj SimpleGraph.sdiff_adj
instance supSet : SupSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sSup s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b
symm := fun a b => Exists.imp fun _ => And.imp_right Adj.symm
loopless := by
rintro a ⟨G, _, ha⟩
exact ha.ne rfl }
instance infSet : InfSet (SimpleGraph V) where
sInf s :=
{ Adj := fun a b => (∀ ⦃G⦄, G ∈ s → Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b
symm := fun _ _ => And.imp (forall₂_imp fun _ _ => Adj.symm) Ne.symm
loopless := fun _ h => h.2 rfl }
@[simp]
theorem sSup_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} {a b : V} : (sSup s).Adj a b ↔ ∃ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.Sup_adj SimpleGraph.sSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem sInf_adj {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} : (sInf s).Adj a b ↔ (∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b) ∧ a ≠ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.Inf_adj SimpleGraph.sInf_adj
@[simp]
theorem iSup_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨆ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∃ i, (f i).Adj a b := by simp [iSup]
#align simple_graph.supr_adj SimpleGraph.iSup_adj
@[simp]
theorem iInf_adj {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} : (⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ (∀ i, (f i).Adj a b) ∧ a ≠ b := by
simp [iInf]
#align simple_graph.infi_adj SimpleGraph.iInf_adj
theorem sInf_adj_of_nonempty {s : Set (SimpleGraph V)} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
(sInf s).Adj a b ↔ ∀ G ∈ s, Adj G a b :=
sInf_adj.trans <|
and_iff_left_of_imp <| by
obtain ⟨G, hG⟩ := hs
exact fun h => (h _ hG).ne
#align simple_graph.Inf_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.sInf_adj_of_nonempty
theorem iInf_adj_of_nonempty [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → SimpleGraph V} :
(⨅ i, f i).Adj a b ↔ ∀ i, (f i).Adj a b := by
rw [iInf, sInf_adj_of_nonempty (Set.range_nonempty _), Set.forall_mem_range]
#align simple_graph.infi_adj_of_nonempty SimpleGraph.iInf_adj_of_nonempty
/-- For graphs `G`, `H`, `G ≤ H` iff `∀ a b, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b`. -/
instance distribLattice : DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ show DistribLattice (SimpleGraph V) from
adj_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl with
le := fun G H => ∀ ⦃a b⦄, G.Adj a b → H.Adj a b }
instance completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra : CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra (SimpleGraph V) :=
{ SimpleGraph.distribLattice with
le := (· ≤ ·)
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
compl := HasCompl.compl
sdiff := (· \ ·)
top := completeGraph V
bot := emptyGraph V
le_top := fun x v w h => x.ne_of_adj h
bot_le := fun x v w h => h.elim
sdiff_eq := fun x y => by
ext v w
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.1, ⟨?_, h.2⟩⟩, fun h => ⟨h.1, h.2.2⟩⟩
rintro rfl
exact x.irrefl h.1
inf_compl_le_bot := fun G v w h => False.elim <| h.2.2 h.1
top_le_sup_compl := fun G v w hvw => by
by_cases h : G.Adj v w
· exact Or.inl h
· exact Or.inr ⟨hvw, h⟩
sSup := sSup
le_sSup := fun s G hG a b hab => ⟨G, hG, hab⟩
sSup_le := fun s G hG a b => by
rintro ⟨H, hH, hab⟩
exact hG _ hH hab
sInf := sInf
sInf_le := fun s G hG a b hab => hab.1 hG
le_sInf := fun s G hG a b hab => ⟨fun H hH => hG _ hH hab, hab.ne⟩
iInf_iSup_eq := fun f => by ext; simp [Classical.skolem] }
@[simp]
theorem top_adj (v w : V) : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.top_adj SimpleGraph.top_adj
@[simp]
theorem bot_adj (v w : V) : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj v w ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.bot_adj SimpleGraph.bot_adj
@[simp]
theorem completeGraph_eq_top (V : Type u) : completeGraph V = ⊤ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.complete_graph_eq_top SimpleGraph.completeGraph_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem emptyGraph_eq_bot (V : Type u) : emptyGraph V = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.empty_graph_eq_bot SimpleGraph.emptyGraph_eq_bot
@[simps]
instance (V : Type u) : Inhabited (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance [Subsingleton V] : Unique (SimpleGraph V) where
default := ⊥
uniq G := by ext a b; have := Subsingleton.elim a b; simp [this]
instance [Nontrivial V] : Nontrivial (SimpleGraph V) :=
⟨⟨⊥, ⊤, fun h ↦ not_subsingleton V ⟨by simpa only [← adj_inj, Function.funext_iff, bot_adj,
top_adj, ne_eq, eq_iff_iff, false_iff, not_not] using h⟩⟩⟩
section Decidable
variable (V) (H : SimpleGraph V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] [DecidableRel H.Adj]
instance Bot.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun _ _ => False
#align simple_graph.bot.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Bot.adjDecidable
instance Sup.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊔ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∨ H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.sup.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Sup.adjDecidable
instance Inf.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G ⊓ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.inf.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Inf.adjDecidable
instance Sdiff.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (G \ H).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => G.Adj v w ∧ ¬H.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.sdiff.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Sdiff.adjDecidable
variable [DecidableEq V]
instance Top.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).Adj :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w
#align simple_graph.top.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Top.adjDecidable
instance Compl.adjDecidable : DecidableRel (Gᶜ.Adj) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidableRel fun v w => v ≠ w ∧ ¬G.Adj v w
#align simple_graph.compl.adj_decidable SimpleGraph.Compl.adjDecidable
end Decidable
end Order
/-- `G.support` is the set of vertices that form edges in `G`. -/
def support : Set V :=
Rel.dom G.Adj
#align simple_graph.support SimpleGraph.support
theorem mem_support {v : V} : v ∈ G.support ↔ ∃ w, G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_support SimpleGraph.mem_support
theorem support_mono {G G' : SimpleGraph V} (h : G ≤ G') : G.support ⊆ G'.support :=
Rel.dom_mono h
#align simple_graph.support_mono SimpleGraph.support_mono
/-- `G.neighborSet v` is the set of vertices adjacent to `v` in `G`. -/
def neighborSet (v : V) : Set V := {w | G.Adj v w}
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set SimpleGraph.neighborSet
instance neighborSet.memDecidable (v : V) [DecidableRel G.Adj] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.neighborSet v) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred (Adj G v)
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set.mem_decidable SimpleGraph.neighborSet.memDecidable
section EdgeSet
variable {G₁ G₂ : SimpleGraph V}
/-- The edges of G consist of the unordered pairs of vertices related by
`G.Adj`. This is the order embedding; for the edge set of a particular graph, see
`SimpleGraph.edgeSet`.
The way `edgeSet` is defined is such that `mem_edgeSet` is proved by `Iff.rfl`.
(That is, `s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet` is definitionally equal to `G.Adj v w`.)
-/
-- Porting note: We need a separate definition so that dot notation works.
def edgeSetEmbedding (V : Type*) : SimpleGraph V ↪o Set (Sym2 V) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun G => Sym2.fromRel G.symm) fun _ _ =>
⟨fun h a b => @h s(a, b), fun h e => Sym2.ind @h e⟩
/-- `G.edgeSet` is the edge set for `G`.
This is an abbreviation for `edgeSetEmbedding G` that permits dot notation. -/
abbrev edgeSet (G : SimpleGraph V) : Set (Sym2 V) := edgeSetEmbedding V G
#align simple_graph.edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSetEmbedding
@[simp]
theorem mem_edgeSet : s(v, w) ∈ G.edgeSet ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.mem_edgeSet
theorem not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet : e ∈ edgeSet G → ¬e.IsDiag :=
Sym2.ind (fun _ _ => Adj.ne) e
#align simple_graph.not_is_diag_of_mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_inj : G₁.edgeSet = G₂.edgeSet ↔ G₁ = G₂ := (edgeSetEmbedding V).eq_iff_eq
#align simple_graph.edge_set_inj SimpleGraph.edgeSet_inj
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊆ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ ≤ G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).le_iff_le
#align simple_graph.edge_set_subset_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_subset_edgeSet
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet : edgeSet G₁ ⊂ edgeSet G₂ ↔ G₁ < G₂ :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).lt_iff_lt
#align simple_graph.edge_set_ssubset_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet
theorem edgeSet_injective : Injective (edgeSet : SimpleGraph V → Set (Sym2 V)) :=
(edgeSetEmbedding V).injective
#align simple_graph.edge_set_injective SimpleGraph.edgeSet_injective
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_mono⟩ := edgeSet_subset_edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_set_mono SimpleGraph.edgeSet_mono
alias ⟨_, edgeSet_strict_mono⟩ := edgeSet_ssubset_edgeSet
#align simple_graph.edge_set_strict_mono SimpleGraph.edgeSet_strict_mono
attribute [mono] edgeSet_mono edgeSet_strict_mono
variable (G₁ G₂)
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_bot : (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = ∅ :=
Sym2.fromRel_bot
#align simple_graph.edge_set_bot SimpleGraph.edgeSet_bot
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_top : (⊤ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet = {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
Sym2.fromRel_ne
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_subset_setOf_not_isDiag : G.edgeSet ⊆ {e | ¬e.IsDiag} :=
fun _ h => (Sym2.fromRel_irreflexive (sym := G.symm)).mp G.loopless h
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sup : (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∪ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sup
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_inf : (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet ∩ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.edgeSet_inf
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff : (G₁ \ G₂).edgeSet = G₁.edgeSet \ G₂.edgeSet := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
rfl
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sdiff
variable {G G₁ G₂}
@[simp] lemma disjoint_edgeSet : Disjoint G₁.edgeSet G₂.edgeSet ↔ Disjoint G₁ G₂ := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← edgeSet_inf, ← edgeSet_bot, ← Set.le_iff_subset,
OrderEmbedding.le_iff_le]
#align simple_graph.disjoint_edge_set SimpleGraph.disjoint_edgeSet
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_eq_empty : G.edgeSet = ∅ ↔ G = ⊥ := by rw [← edgeSet_bot, edgeSet_inj]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_eq_empty SimpleGraph.edgeSet_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma edgeSet_nonempty : G.edgeSet.Nonempty ↔ G ≠ ⊥ := by
rw [Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, edgeSet_eq_empty.ne]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_nonempty SimpleGraph.edgeSet_nonempty
/-- This lemma, combined with `edgeSet_sdiff` and `edgeSet_from_edgeSet`,
allows proving `(G \ from_edgeSet s).edge_set = G.edgeSet \ s` by `simp`. -/
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_sdiff_sdiff_isDiag (G : SimpleGraph V) (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
G.edgeSet \ (s \ { e | e.IsDiag }) = G.edgeSet \ s := by
ext e
simp only [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_setOf_eq, not_and, not_not, and_congr_right_iff]
intro h
simp only [G.not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet h, imp_false]
#align simple_graph.edge_set_sdiff_sdiff_is_diag SimpleGraph.edgeSet_sdiff_sdiff_isDiag
/-- Two vertices are adjacent iff there is an edge between them. The
condition `v ≠ w` ensures they are different endpoints of the edge,
which is necessary since when `v = w` the existential
`∃ (e ∈ G.edgeSet), v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e` is satisfied by every edge
incident to `v`. -/
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge {v w : V} : G.Adj v w ↔ v ≠ w ∧ ∃ e ∈ G.edgeSet, v ∈ e ∧ w ∈ e := by
refine ⟨fun _ => ⟨G.ne_of_adj ‹_›, s(v, w), by simpa⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hne, e, he, hv⟩
rw [Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff hne] at hv
subst e
rwa [mem_edgeSet] at he
#align simple_graph.adj_iff_exists_edge SimpleGraph.adj_iff_exists_edge
theorem adj_iff_exists_edge_coe : G.Adj a b ↔ ∃ e : G.edgeSet, e.val = s(a, b) := by
simp only [mem_edgeSet, exists_prop, SetCoe.exists, exists_eq_right, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align simple_graph.adj_iff_exists_edge_coe SimpleGraph.adj_iff_exists_edge_coe
variable (G G₁ G₂)
theorem edge_other_ne {e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ G.edgeSet) {v : V} (h : v ∈ e) :
Sym2.Mem.other h ≠ v := by
erw [← Sym2.other_spec h, Sym2.eq_swap] at he
exact G.ne_of_adj he
#align simple_graph.edge_other_ne SimpleGraph.edge_other_ne
instance decidableMemEdgeSet [DecidableRel G.Adj] : DecidablePred (· ∈ G.edgeSet) :=
Sym2.fromRel.decidablePred G.symm
#align simple_graph.decidable_mem_edge_set SimpleGraph.decidableMemEdgeSet
instance fintypeEdgeSet [Fintype (Sym2 V)] [DecidableRel G.Adj] : Fintype G.edgeSet :=
Subtype.fintype _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSet
instance fintypeEdgeSetBot : Fintype (⊥ : SimpleGraph V).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_bot]
infer_instance
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_bot SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetBot
instance fintypeEdgeSetSup [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ ⊔ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_sup]
infer_instance
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetSup
instance fintypeEdgeSetInf [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ ⊓ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_inf]
exact Set.fintypeInter _ _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetInf
instance fintypeEdgeSetSdiff [DecidableEq V] [Fintype G₁.edgeSet] [Fintype G₂.edgeSet] :
Fintype (G₁ \ G₂).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_sdiff]
exact Set.fintypeDiff _ _
#align simple_graph.fintype_edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.fintypeEdgeSetSdiff
end EdgeSet
section FromEdgeSet
variable (s : Set (Sym2 V))
/-- `fromEdgeSet` constructs a `SimpleGraph` from a set of edges, without loops. -/
def fromEdgeSet : SimpleGraph V where
Adj := Sym2.ToRel s ⊓ Ne
symm v w h := ⟨Sym2.toRel_symmetric s h.1, h.2.symm⟩
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_adj : (fromEdgeSet s).Adj v w ↔ s(v, w) ∈ s ∧ v ≠ w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_adj SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_adj
-- Note: we need to make sure `fromEdgeSet_adj` and this lemma are confluent.
-- In particular, both yield `s(u, v) ∈ (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet` ==> `s(v, w) ∈ s ∧ v ≠ w`.
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_fromEdgeSet : (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet = s \ { e | e.IsDiag } := by
ext e
exact Sym2.ind (by simp) e
#align simple_graph.edge_set_from_edge_set SimpleGraph.edgeSet_fromEdgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_edgeSet : fromEdgeSet G.edgeSet = G := by
ext v w
exact ⟨fun h => h.1, fun h => ⟨h, G.ne_of_adj h⟩⟩
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_edge_set SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_edgeSet
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_empty : fromEdgeSet (∅ : Set (Sym2 V)) = ⊥ := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_empty_iff_false, false_and_iff, bot_adj]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_empty SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_univ : fromEdgeSet (Set.univ : Set (Sym2 V)) = ⊤ := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_univ, true_and_iff, top_adj]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_univ SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_univ
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_inter (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s ∩ t) = fromEdgeSet s ⊓ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
simp only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Set.mem_inter_iff, Ne, inf_adj]
tauto
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_inf SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_union (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s ∪ t) = fromEdgeSet s ⊔ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
simp [Set.mem_union, or_and_right]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_sup SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_union
@[simp]
theorem fromEdgeSet_sdiff (s t : Set (Sym2 V)) :
fromEdgeSet (s \ t) = fromEdgeSet s \ fromEdgeSet t := by
ext v w
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true })
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_sdiff SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_sdiff
@[mono]
theorem fromEdgeSet_mono {s t : Set (Sym2 V)} (h : s ⊆ t) : fromEdgeSet s ≤ fromEdgeSet t := by
rintro v w
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [fromEdgeSet_adj, Ne, not_false_iff,
and_true_iff, and_imp]
exact fun vws _ => h vws
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_mono SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_mono
@[simp] lemma disjoint_fromEdgeSet : Disjoint G (fromEdgeSet s) ↔ Disjoint G.edgeSet s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Set.diff_union_inter s {e : Sym2 V | e.IsDiag}]
rw [← disjoint_edgeSet, edgeSet_fromEdgeSet, Set.disjoint_union_right, and_iff_left]
exact Set.disjoint_left.2 fun e he he' ↦ not_isDiag_of_mem_edgeSet _ he he'.2
#align simple_graph.disjoint_from_edge_set SimpleGraph.disjoint_fromEdgeSet
@[simp] lemma fromEdgeSet_disjoint : Disjoint (fromEdgeSet s) G ↔ Disjoint s G.edgeSet := by
rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_fromEdgeSet, disjoint_comm]
#align simple_graph.from_edge_set_disjoint SimpleGraph.fromEdgeSet_disjoint
instance [DecidableEq V] [Fintype s] : Fintype (fromEdgeSet s).edgeSet := by
rw [edgeSet_fromEdgeSet s]
infer_instance
end FromEdgeSet
/-! ### Incidence set -/
/-- Set of edges incident to a given vertex, aka incidence set. -/
def incidenceSet (v : V) : Set (Sym2 V) :=
{ e ∈ G.edgeSet | v ∈ e }
#align simple_graph.incidence_set SimpleGraph.incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_subset (v : V) : G.incidenceSet v ⊆ G.edgeSet := fun _ h => h.1
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_subset
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff : s(b, c) ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ G.Adj b c ∧ (a = b ∨ a = c) :=
and_congr_right' Sym2.mem_iff
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_iff
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff : s(a, b) ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ G.Adj a b :=
and_iff_left <| Sym2.mem_mk_left _ _
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_left_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff
theorem mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff : s(a, b) ∈ G.incidenceSet b ↔ G.Adj a b :=
and_iff_left <| Sym2.mem_mk_right _ _
#align simple_graph.mk_mem_incidence_set_right_iff SimpleGraph.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff
theorem edge_mem_incidenceSet_iff {e : G.edgeSet} : ↑e ∈ G.incidenceSet a ↔ a ∈ (e : Sym2 V) :=
and_iff_right e.2
#align simple_graph.edge_mem_incidence_set_iff SimpleGraph.edge_mem_incidenceSet_iff
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset (h : a ≠ b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b ⊆ {s(a, b)} := fun _e he =>
(Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff h).1 ⟨he.1.2, he.2.2⟩
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_subset SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_adj (h : G.Adj a b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b = {s(a, b)} := by
refine (G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset <| h.ne).antisymm ?_
rintro _ (rfl : _ = s(a, b))
exact ⟨G.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff.2 h, G.mk'_mem_incidenceSet_right_iff.2 h⟩
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_of_adj SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_adj
theorem adj_of_mem_incidenceSet (h : a ≠ b) (ha : e ∈ G.incidenceSet a)
(hb : e ∈ G.incidenceSet b) : G.Adj a b := by
rwa [← mk'_mem_incidenceSet_left_iff, ←
Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 <| G.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_subset h ⟨ha, hb⟩]
#align simple_graph.adj_of_mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.adj_of_mem_incidenceSet
theorem incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj (h : ¬G.Adj a b) (hn : a ≠ b) :
G.incidenceSet a ∩ G.incidenceSet b = ∅ := by
simp_rw [Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, Set.mem_inter_iff, not_and]
intro u ha hb
exact h (G.adj_of_mem_incidenceSet hn ha hb)
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_inter_incidence_set_of_not_adj SimpleGraph.incidenceSet_inter_incidenceSet_of_not_adj
instance decidableMemIncidenceSet [DecidableEq V] [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.incidenceSet v) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun e => e ∈ G.edgeSet ∧ v ∈ e
#align simple_graph.decidable_mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.decidableMemIncidenceSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_neighborSet (v w : V) : w ∈ G.neighborSet v ↔ G.Adj v w :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.mem_neighborSet
lemma not_mem_neighborSet_self : a ∉ G.neighborSet a := by simp
#align simple_graph.not_mem_neighbor_set_self SimpleGraph.not_mem_neighborSet_self
@[simp]
theorem mem_incidenceSet (v w : V) : s(v, w) ∈ G.incidenceSet v ↔ G.Adj v w := by
simp [incidenceSet]
#align simple_graph.mem_incidence_set SimpleGraph.mem_incidenceSet
theorem mem_incidence_iff_neighbor {v w : V} :
s(v, w) ∈ G.incidenceSet v ↔ w ∈ G.neighborSet v := by
simp only [mem_incidenceSet, mem_neighborSet]
#align simple_graph.mem_incidence_iff_neighbor SimpleGraph.mem_incidence_iff_neighbor
theorem adj_incidenceSet_inter {v : V} {e : Sym2 V} (he : e ∈ G.edgeSet) (h : v ∈ e) :
G.incidenceSet v ∩ G.incidenceSet (Sym2.Mem.other h) = {e} := by
ext e'
simp only [incidenceSet, Set.mem_sep_iff, Set.mem_inter_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← Sym2.other_spec h]
exact (Sym2.mem_and_mem_iff (edge_other_ne G he h).symm).mp ⟨h'.1.2, h'.2.2⟩
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨⟨he, h⟩, he, Sym2.other_mem _⟩
#align simple_graph.adj_incidence_set_inter SimpleGraph.adj_incidenceSet_inter
theorem compl_neighborSet_disjoint (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) :
Disjoint (G.neighborSet v) (Gᶜ.neighborSet v) := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro w ⟨h, h'⟩
rw [mem_neighborSet, compl_adj] at h'
exact h'.2 h
#align simple_graph.compl_neighbor_set_disjoint SimpleGraph.compl_neighborSet_disjoint
theorem neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet_eq (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) :
G.neighborSet v ∪ Gᶜ.neighborSet v = {v}ᶜ := by
ext w
have h := @ne_of_adj _ G
simp_rw [Set.mem_union, mem_neighborSet, compl_adj, Set.mem_compl_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
tauto
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set_union_compl_neighbor_set_eq SimpleGraph.neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet_eq
theorem card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet [Fintype V] (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V)
[Fintype (G.neighborSet v ∪ Gᶜ.neighborSet v : Set V)] :
(Set.toFinset (G.neighborSet v ∪ Gᶜ.neighborSet v)).card = Fintype.card V - 1 := by
classical simp_rw [neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet_eq, Set.toFinset_compl,
Finset.card_compl, Set.toFinset_card, Set.card_singleton]
#align simple_graph.card_neighbor_set_union_compl_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.card_neighborSet_union_compl_neighborSet
theorem neighborSet_compl (G : SimpleGraph V) (v : V) :
Gᶜ.neighborSet v = (G.neighborSet v)ᶜ \ {v} := by
ext w
simp [and_comm, eq_comm]
#align simple_graph.neighbor_set_compl SimpleGraph.neighborSet_compl
/-- The set of common neighbors between two vertices `v` and `w` in a graph `G` is the
intersection of the neighbor sets of `v` and `w`. -/
def commonNeighbors (v w : V) : Set V :=
G.neighborSet v ∩ G.neighborSet w
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors
theorem commonNeighbors_eq (v w : V) : G.commonNeighbors v w = G.neighborSet v ∩ G.neighborSet w :=
rfl
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors_eq SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors_eq
theorem mem_commonNeighbors {u v w : V} : u ∈ G.commonNeighbors v w ↔ G.Adj v u ∧ G.Adj w u :=
Iff.rfl
#align simple_graph.mem_common_neighbors SimpleGraph.mem_commonNeighbors
theorem commonNeighbors_symm (v w : V) : G.commonNeighbors v w = G.commonNeighbors w v :=
Set.inter_comm _ _
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors_symm SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors_symm
theorem not_mem_commonNeighbors_left (v w : V) : v ∉ G.commonNeighbors v w := fun h =>
ne_of_adj G h.1 rfl
#align simple_graph.not_mem_common_neighbors_left SimpleGraph.not_mem_commonNeighbors_left
theorem not_mem_commonNeighbors_right (v w : V) : w ∉ G.commonNeighbors v w := fun h =>
ne_of_adj G h.2 rfl
#align simple_graph.not_mem_common_neighbors_right SimpleGraph.not_mem_commonNeighbors_right
theorem commonNeighbors_subset_neighborSet_left (v w : V) :
G.commonNeighbors v w ⊆ G.neighborSet v :=
Set.inter_subset_left
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors_subset_neighbor_set_left SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors_subset_neighborSet_left
theorem commonNeighbors_subset_neighborSet_right (v w : V) :
G.commonNeighbors v w ⊆ G.neighborSet w :=
Set.inter_subset_right
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors_subset_neighbor_set_right SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors_subset_neighborSet_right
instance decidableMemCommonNeighbors [DecidableRel G.Adj] (v w : V) :
DecidablePred (· ∈ G.commonNeighbors v w) :=
inferInstanceAs <| DecidablePred fun u => u ∈ G.neighborSet v ∧ u ∈ G.neighborSet w
#align simple_graph.decidable_mem_common_neighbors SimpleGraph.decidableMemCommonNeighbors
theorem commonNeighbors_top_eq {v w : V} :
(⊤ : SimpleGraph V).commonNeighbors v w = Set.univ \ {v, w} := by
ext u
simp [commonNeighbors, eq_comm, not_or]
#align simple_graph.common_neighbors_top_eq SimpleGraph.commonNeighbors_top_eq
section Incidence
variable [DecidableEq V]
/-- Given an edge incident to a particular vertex, get the other vertex on the edge. -/
def otherVertexOfIncident {v : V} {e : Sym2 V} (h : e ∈ G.incidenceSet v) : V :=
Sym2.Mem.other' h.2
#align simple_graph.other_vertex_of_incident SimpleGraph.otherVertexOfIncident
theorem edge_other_incident_set {v : V} {e : Sym2 V} (h : e ∈ G.incidenceSet v) :
e ∈ G.incidenceSet (G.otherVertexOfIncident h) := by
use h.1
simp [otherVertexOfIncident, Sym2.other_mem']
#align simple_graph.edge_other_incident_set SimpleGraph.edge_other_incident_set
theorem incidence_other_prop {v : V} {e : Sym2 V} (h : e ∈ G.incidenceSet v) :
G.otherVertexOfIncident h ∈ G.neighborSet v := by
cases' h with he hv
rwa [← Sym2.other_spec' hv, mem_edgeSet] at he
#align simple_graph.incidence_other_prop SimpleGraph.incidence_other_prop
-- Porting note: as a simp lemma this does not apply even to itself
theorem incidence_other_neighbor_edge {v w : V} (h : w ∈ G.neighborSet v) :
G.otherVertexOfIncident (G.mem_incidence_iff_neighbor.mpr h) = w :=
Sym2.congr_right.mp (Sym2.other_spec' (G.mem_incidence_iff_neighbor.mpr h).right)
#align simple_graph.incidence_other_neighbor_edge SimpleGraph.incidence_other_neighbor_edge
/-- There is an equivalence between the set of edges incident to a given
vertex and the set of vertices adjacent to the vertex. -/
@[simps]
def incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet (v : V) : G.incidenceSet v ≃ G.neighborSet v where
toFun e := ⟨G.otherVertexOfIncident e.2, G.incidence_other_prop e.2⟩
invFun w := ⟨s(v, w.1), G.mem_incidence_iff_neighbor.mpr w.2⟩
left_inv x := by simp [otherVertexOfIncident]
right_inv := fun ⟨w, hw⟩ => by
simp only [mem_neighborSet, Subtype.mk.injEq]
exact incidence_other_neighbor_edge _ hw
#align simple_graph.incidence_set_equiv_neighbor_set SimpleGraph.incidenceSetEquivNeighborSet
end Incidence
/-! ## Edge deletion -/
section deleteEdges
/-- Given a set of vertex pairs, remove all of the corresponding edges from the
graph's edge set, if present.
See also: `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.deleteEdges`. -/
def deleteEdges (s : Set (Sym2 V)) : SimpleGraph V := G \ fromEdgeSet s
#align simple_graph.delete_edges SimpleGraph.deleteEdges
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_eq_sdiff_from_edge_set SimpleGraph.deleteEdges
#align simple_graph.sdiff_eq_delete_edges SimpleGraph.deleteEdges
#align simple_graph.compl_eq_delete_edges SimpleGraph.deleteEdges
variable {G} {H : SimpleGraph V} {s s₁ s₂ : Set (Sym2 V)}
@[simp] lemma deleteEdges_adj : (G.deleteEdges s).Adj v w ↔ G.Adj v w ∧ ¬s(v, w) ∈ s :=
and_congr_right fun h ↦ (and_iff_left h.ne).not
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_adj SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_adj
@[simp] lemma deleteEdges_edgeSet (G G' : SimpleGraph V) : G.deleteEdges G'.edgeSet = G \ G' := by
ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem deleteEdges_deleteEdges (s s' : Set (Sym2 V)) :
(G.deleteEdges s).deleteEdges s' = G.deleteEdges (s ∪ s') := by simp [deleteEdges, sdiff_sdiff]
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_delete_edges SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_deleteEdges
@[simp] lemma deleteEdges_empty : G.deleteEdges ∅ = G := by simp [deleteEdges]
@[simp] lemma deleteEdges_univ : G.deleteEdges Set.univ = ⊥ := by simp [deleteEdges]
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_empty_eq SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_empty
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_univ_eq SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_univ
lemma deleteEdges_le (s : Set (Sym2 V)) : G.deleteEdges s ≤ G := sdiff_le
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_le SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_le
lemma deleteEdges_anti (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : G.deleteEdges s₂ ≤ G.deleteEdges s₁ :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left $ fromEdgeSet_mono h
#align simple_graph.delete_edges_le_of_le SimpleGraph.deleteEdges_anti
lemma deleteEdges_mono (h : G ≤ H) : G.deleteEdges s ≤ H.deleteEdges s := sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Basic.lean | 952 | 955 | theorem deleteEdges_eq_inter_edgeSet (s : Set (Sym2 V)) :
G.deleteEdges s = G.deleteEdges (s ∩ G.edgeSet) := by |
ext
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [imp_false]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Ordering.Lemmas
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Principal
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.notation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b67044ba53af18680e1dd246861d9584e968495d"
/-!
# Ordinal notation
Constructive ordinal arithmetic for ordinals below `ε₀`.
We define a type `ONote`, with constructors `0 : ONote` and `ONote.oadd e n a` representing
`ω ^ e * n + a`.
We say that `o` is in Cantor normal form - `ONote.NF o` - if either `o = 0` or
`o = ω ^ e * n + a` with `a < ω ^ e` and `a` in Cantor normal form.
The type `NONote` is the type of ordinals below `ε₀` in Cantor normal form.
Various operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, power function)
are defined on `ONote` and `NONote`.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Ordinal Order
-- Porting note: the generated theorem is warned by `simpNF`.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- Recursive definition of an ordinal notation. `zero` denotes the
ordinal 0, and `oadd e n a` is intended to refer to `ω^e * n + a`.
For this to be valid Cantor normal form, we must have the exponents
decrease to the right, but we can't state this condition until we've
defined `repr`, so it is a separate definition `NF`. -/
inductive ONote : Type
| zero : ONote
| oadd : ONote → ℕ+ → ONote → ONote
deriving DecidableEq
#align onote ONote
compile_inductive% ONote
namespace ONote
/-- Notation for 0 -/
instance : Zero ONote :=
⟨zero⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_def : zero = 0 :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_def ONote.zero_def
instance : Inhabited ONote :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Notation for 1 -/
instance : One ONote :=
⟨oadd 0 1 0⟩
/-- Notation for ω -/
def omega : ONote :=
oadd 1 1 0
#align onote.omega ONote.omega
/-- The ordinal denoted by a notation -/
@[simp]
noncomputable def repr : ONote → Ordinal.{0}
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => ω ^ repr e * n + repr a
#align onote.repr ONote.repr
/-- Auxiliary definition to print an ordinal notation -/
def toStringAux1 (e : ONote) (n : ℕ) (s : String) : String :=
if e = 0 then toString n
else (if e = 1 then "ω" else "ω^(" ++ s ++ ")") ++ if n = 1 then "" else "*" ++ toString n
#align onote.to_string_aux1 ONote.toStringAux1
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def toString : ONote → String
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n 0 => toStringAux1 e n (toString e)
| oadd e n a => toStringAux1 e n (toString e) ++ " + " ++ toString a
#align onote.to_string ONote.toString
open Lean in
/-- Print an ordinal notation -/
def repr' (prec : ℕ) : ONote → Format
| zero => "0"
| oadd e n a =>
Repr.addAppParen
("oadd " ++ (repr' max_prec e) ++ " " ++ Nat.repr (n : ℕ) ++ " " ++ (repr' max_prec a))
prec
#align onote.repr' ONote.repr
instance : ToString ONote :=
⟨toString⟩
instance : Repr ONote where
reprPrec o prec := repr' prec o
instance : Preorder ONote where
le x y := repr x ≤ repr y
lt x y := repr x < repr y
le_refl _ := @le_refl Ordinal _ _
le_trans _ _ _ := @le_trans Ordinal _ _ _ _
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := @lt_iff_le_not_le Ordinal _ _ _
theorem lt_def {x y : ONote} : x < y ↔ repr x < repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.lt_def ONote.lt_def
theorem le_def {x y : ONote} : x ≤ y ↔ repr x ≤ repr y :=
Iff.rfl
#align onote.le_def ONote.le_def
instance : WellFoundedRelation ONote :=
⟨(· < ·), InvImage.wf repr Ordinal.lt_wf⟩
/-- Convert a `Nat` into an ordinal -/
@[coe]
def ofNat : ℕ → ONote
| 0 => 0
| Nat.succ n => oadd 0 n.succPNat 0
#align onote.of_nat ONote.ofNat
-- Porting note (#11467): during the port we marked these lemmas with `@[eqns]`
-- to emulate the old Lean 3 behaviour.
@[simp] theorem ofNat_zero : ofNat 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem ofNat_succ (n) : ofNat (Nat.succ n) = oadd 0 n.succPNat 0 :=
rfl
instance nat (n : ℕ) : OfNat ONote n where
ofNat := ofNat n
@[simp 1200]
theorem ofNat_one : ofNat 1 = 1 :=
rfl
#align onote.of_nat_one ONote.ofNat_one
@[simp]
theorem repr_ofNat (n : ℕ) : repr (ofNat n) = n := by cases n <;> simp
#align onote.repr_of_nat ONote.repr_ofNat
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem repr_one : repr (ofNat 1) = (1 : ℕ) := repr_ofNat 1
#align onote.repr_one ONote.repr_one
theorem omega_le_oadd (e n a) : ω ^ repr e ≤ repr (oadd e n a) := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n.2)
#align onote.omega_le_oadd ONote.omega_le_oadd
theorem oadd_pos (e n a) : 0 < oadd e n a :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ _ (ω ^ repr e) _ (opow_pos (repr e) omega_pos) (omega_le_oadd e n a)
#align onote.oadd_pos ONote.oadd_pos
/-- Compare ordinal notations -/
def cmp : ONote → ONote → Ordering
| 0, 0 => Ordering.eq
| _, 0 => Ordering.gt
| 0, _ => Ordering.lt
| _o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), _o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂) =>
(cmp e₁ e₂).orElse <| (_root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂).orElse (cmp a₁ a₂)
#align onote.cmp ONote.cmp
theorem eq_of_cmp_eq : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, cmp o₁ o₂ = Ordering.eq → o₁ = o₂
| 0, 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, h => by injection h
| 0, oadd e n a, h => by injection h
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h => by
revert h; simp only [cmp]
cases h₁ : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h₁
revert h; cases h₂ : _root_.cmp (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;> intro h <;> try cases h
obtain rfl := eq_of_cmp_eq h
rw [_root_.cmp, cmpUsing_eq_eq] at h₂
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp h₂)
simp
#align onote.eq_of_cmp_eq ONote.eq_of_cmp_eq
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ONote) < 1 := by
simp only [lt_def, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
zero_lt_one]
#align onote.zero_lt_one ONote.zero_lt_one
/-- `NFBelow o b` says that `o` is a normal form ordinal notation
satisfying `repr o < ω ^ b`. -/
inductive NFBelow : ONote → Ordinal.{0} → Prop
| zero {b} : NFBelow 0 b
| oadd' {e n a eb b} : NFBelow e eb → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
#align onote.NF_below ONote.NFBelow
/-- A normal form ordinal notation has the form
ω ^ a₁ * n₁ + ω ^ a₂ * n₂ + ... ω ^ aₖ * nₖ
where `a₁ > a₂ > ... > aₖ` and all the `aᵢ` are
also in normal form.
We will essentially only be interested in normal form
ordinal notations, but to avoid complicating the algorithms
we define everything over general ordinal notations and
only prove correctness with normal form as an invariant. -/
class NF (o : ONote) : Prop where
out : Exists (NFBelow o)
#align onote.NF ONote.NF
instance NF.zero : NF 0 :=
⟨⟨0, NFBelow.zero⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.zero ONote.NF.zero
theorem NFBelow.oadd {e n a b} : NF e → NFBelow a (repr e) → repr e < b → NFBelow (oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => NFBelow.oadd' h
#align onote.NF_below.oadd ONote.NFBelow.oadd
theorem NFBelow.fst {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NF e := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact ⟨⟨_, h₁⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_below.fst ONote.NFBelow.fst
theorem NF.fst {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NF e
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.fst
#align onote.NF.fst ONote.NF.fst
theorem NFBelow.snd {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : NFBelow a (repr e) := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₂
#align onote.NF_below.snd ONote.NFBelow.snd
theorem NF.snd' {e n a} : NF (oadd e n a) → NFBelow a (repr e)
| ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩ => h.snd
#align onote.NF.snd' ONote.NF.snd'
theorem NF.snd {e n a} (h : NF (oadd e n a)) : NF a :=
⟨⟨_, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.snd ONote.NF.snd
theorem NF.oadd {e a} (h₁ : NF e) (n) (h₂ : NFBelow a (repr e)) : NF (oadd e n a) :=
⟨⟨_, NFBelow.oadd h₁ h₂ (lt_succ _)⟩⟩
#align onote.NF.oadd ONote.NF.oadd
instance NF.oadd_zero (e n) [h : NF e] : NF (ONote.oadd e n 0) :=
h.oadd _ NFBelow.zero
#align onote.NF.oadd_zero ONote.NF.oadd_zero
theorem NFBelow.lt {e n a b} (h : NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b) : repr e < b := by
cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact h₃
#align onote.NF_below.lt ONote.NFBelow.lt
theorem NFBelow_zero : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o 0 ↔ o = 0
| 0 => ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => (not_le_of_lt h.lt).elim (Ordinal.zero_le _), fun e => e.symm ▸ NFBelow.zero⟩
#align onote.NF_below_zero ONote.NFBelow_zero
theorem NF.zero_of_zero {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) (e0 : e = 0) : a = 0 := by
simpa [e0, NFBelow_zero] using h.snd'
#align onote.NF.zero_of_zero ONote.NF.zero_of_zero
theorem NFBelow.repr_lt {o b} (h : NFBelow o b) : repr o < ω ^ b := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ IH
· exact opow_pos _ omega_pos
· rw [repr]
apply ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 IH).trans_le
rw [← mul_succ]
apply (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_of_lt (nat_lt_omega _)) _).trans
rw [← opow_succ]
exact opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (succ_le_of_lt h₃)
#align onote.NF_below.repr_lt ONote.NFBelow.repr_lt
theorem NFBelow.mono {o b₁ b₂} (bb : b₁ ≤ b₂) (h : NFBelow o b₁) : NFBelow o b₂ := by
induction' h with _ e n a eb b h₁ h₂ h₃ _ _ <;> constructor
exacts [h₁, h₂, lt_of_lt_of_le h₃ bb]
#align onote.NF_below.mono ONote.NFBelow.mono
theorem NF.below_of_lt {e n a b} (H : repr e < b) :
NF (ONote.oadd e n a) → NFBelow (ONote.oadd e n a) b
| ⟨⟨b', h⟩⟩ => by (cases' h with _ _ _ _ eb _ h₁ h₂ h₃; exact NFBelow.oadd' h₁ h₂ H)
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt ONote.NF.below_of_lt
theorem NF.below_of_lt' : ∀ {o b}, repr o < ω ^ b → NF o → NFBelow o b
| 0, _, _, _ => NFBelow.zero
| ONote.oadd _ _ _, _, H, h =>
h.below_of_lt <|
(opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (omega_le_oadd _ _ _) H
#align onote.NF.below_of_lt' ONote.NF.below_of_lt'
theorem nfBelow_ofNat : ∀ n, NFBelow (ofNat n) 1
| 0 => NFBelow.zero
| Nat.succ _ => NFBelow.oadd NF.zero NFBelow.zero zero_lt_one
#align onote.NF_below_of_nat ONote.nfBelow_ofNat
instance nf_ofNat (n) : NF (ofNat n) :=
⟨⟨_, nfBelow_ofNat n⟩⟩
#align onote.NF_of_nat ONote.nf_ofNat
instance nf_one : NF 1 := by rw [← ofNat_one]; infer_instance
#align onote.NF_one ONote.nf_one
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_1 {e₁ n₁ o₁ e₂ n₂ o₂} (h₁ : NF (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) (h : e₁ < e₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ o₁ < oadd e₂ n₂ o₂ :=
@lt_of_lt_of_le _ _ (repr (oadd e₁ n₁ o₁)) _ _
(NF.below_of_lt h h₁).repr_lt (omega_le_oadd e₂ n₂ o₂)
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_1 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_1
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_2 {e o₁ o₂ : ONote} {n₁ n₂ : ℕ+} (h₁ : NF (oadd e n₁ o₁)) (h : (n₁ : ℕ) < n₂) :
oadd e n₁ o₁ < oadd e n₂ o₂ := by
simp only [lt_def, repr]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 h₁.snd'.repr_lt) (le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _))
rwa [← mul_succ,Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left (opow_pos _ omega_pos), succ_le_iff, natCast_lt]
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_2 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_2
theorem oadd_lt_oadd_3 {e n a₁ a₂} (h : a₁ < a₂) : oadd e n a₁ < oadd e n a₂ := by
rw [lt_def]; unfold repr
exact @add_lt_add_left _ _ _ _ (repr a₁) _ h _
#align onote.oadd_lt_oadd_3 ONote.oadd_lt_oadd_3
theorem cmp_compares : ∀ (a b : ONote) [NF a] [NF b], (cmp a b).Compares a b
| 0, 0, _, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| 0, oadd e n a, _, _ => oadd_pos _ _ _
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), o₂@(oadd e₂ n₂ a₂), h₁, h₂ => by -- TODO: golf
rw [cmp]
have IHe := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
simp only [Ordering.Compares, gt_iff_lt] at IHe; revert IHe
cases cmp e₁ e₂
case lt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ IHe
case gt => intro IHe; exact oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₂ IHe
case eq =>
intro IHe; dsimp at IHe; subst IHe
unfold _root_.cmp; cases nh : cmpUsing (· < ·) (n₁ : ℕ) n₂ <;>
rw [cmpUsing, ite_eq_iff, not_lt] at nh
case lt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ nh.left
· rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh.right with nh nh <;> cases nh <;> contradiction
case gt =>
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
· cases' nh with _ nh
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nh; cases' nh with nh nh
· exact oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₂ nh.left
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nh nh
· cases nh; contradiction
cases' nh with nhl nhr
rw [ite_eq_iff] at nhr
cases' nhr with nhr nhr
· cases nhr; contradiction
obtain rfl := Subtype.eq (eq_of_incomp ⟨(not_lt_of_ge nhl), nhr.left⟩)
have IHa := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.snd h₂.snd
revert IHa; cases cmp a₁ a₂ <;> intro IHa <;> dsimp at IHa
case lt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
case gt => exact oadd_lt_oadd_3 IHa
subst IHa; exact rfl
#align onote.cmp_compares ONote.cmp_compares
theorem repr_inj {a b} [NF a] [NF b] : repr a = repr b ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun e => match cmp a b, cmp_compares a b with
| Ordering.lt, (h : repr a < repr b) => (ne_of_lt h e).elim
| Ordering.gt, (h : repr a > repr b)=> (ne_of_gt h e).elim
| Ordering.eq, h => h,
congr_arg _⟩
#align onote.repr_inj ONote.repr_inj
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega_opow {b e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a))
(d : ω ^ b ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
b ≤ repr e ∧ ω ^ b ∣ repr a := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 (fun h => by injection h : ONote.oadd e n a ≠ 0)
have L := le_of_not_lt fun l => not_le_of_lt (h.below_of_lt l).repr_lt (le_of_dvd this d)
simp only [repr] at d
exact ⟨L, (dvd_add_iff <| (opow_dvd_opow _ L).mul_right _).1 d⟩
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega_opow
theorem NF.of_dvd_omega {e n a} (h : NF (ONote.oadd e n a)) :
ω ∣ repr (ONote.oadd e n a) → repr e ≠ 0 ∧ ω ∣ repr a := by
(rw [← opow_one ω, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero]; exact h.of_dvd_omega_opow)
#align onote.NF.of_dvd_omega ONote.NF.of_dvd_omega
/-- `TopBelow b o` asserts that the largest exponent in `o`, if
it exists, is less than `b`. This is an auxiliary definition
for decidability of `NF`. -/
def TopBelow (b : ONote) : ONote → Prop
| 0 => True
| oadd e _ _ => cmp e b = Ordering.lt
#align onote.top_below ONote.TopBelow
instance decidableTopBelow : DecidableRel TopBelow := by
intro b o
cases o <;> delta TopBelow <;> infer_instance
#align onote.decidable_top_below ONote.decidableTopBelow
theorem nfBelow_iff_topBelow {b} [NF b] : ∀ {o}, NFBelow o (repr b) ↔ NF o ∧ TopBelow b o
| 0 => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, trivial⟩, fun _ => NFBelow.zero⟩
| oadd _ _ _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩, (@cmp_compares _ b h.fst _).eq_lt.2 h.lt⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
h₁.below_of_lt <| (@cmp_compares _ b h₁.fst _).eq_lt.1 h₂⟩
#align onote.NF_below_iff_top_below ONote.nfBelow_iff_topBelow
instance decidableNF : DecidablePred NF
| 0 => isTrue NF.zero
| oadd e n a => by
have := decidableNF e
have := decidableNF a
apply decidable_of_iff (NF e ∧ NF a ∧ TopBelow e a)
rw [← and_congr_right fun h => @nfBelow_iff_topBelow _ h _]
exact ⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => NF.oadd h₁ n h₂, fun h => ⟨h.fst, h.snd'⟩⟩
#align onote.decidable_NF ONote.decidableNF
/-- Auxiliary definition for `add` -/
def addAux (e : ONote) (n : ℕ+) (o : ONote) : ONote :=
match o with
| 0 => oadd e n 0
| o'@(oadd e' n' a') =>
match cmp e e' with
| Ordering.lt => o'
| Ordering.eq => oadd e (n + n') a'
| Ordering.gt => oadd e n o'
/-- Addition of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def add : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, o => o
| oadd e n a, o => addAux e n (add a o)
#align onote.add ONote.add
instance : Add ONote :=
⟨add⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_add (o : ONote) : 0 + o = o :=
rfl
#align onote.zero_add ONote.zero_add
theorem oadd_add (e n a o) : oadd e n a + o = addAux e n (a + o) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_add ONote.oadd_add
/-- Subtraction of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def sub : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| o, 0 => o
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
match cmp e₁ e₂ with
| Ordering.lt => 0
| Ordering.gt => o₁
| Ordering.eq =>
match (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ with
| 0 => if n₁ = n₂ then sub a₁ a₂ else 0
| Nat.succ k => oadd e₁ k.succPNat a₁
#align onote.sub ONote.sub
instance : Sub ONote :=
⟨sub⟩
theorem add_nfBelow {b} : ∀ {o₁ o₂}, NFBelow o₁ b → NFBelow o₂ b → NFBelow (o₁ + o₂) b
| 0, _, _, h₂ => h₂
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := add_nfBelow (h₁.snd.mono <| le_of_lt h₁.lt) h₂
simp [oadd_add]; revert h'; cases' a + o with e' n' a' <;> intro h'
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst NFBelow.zero h₁.lt
have : ((e.cmp e').Compares e e') := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h'.fst
cases h: cmp e e' <;> dsimp [addAux] <;> simp [h]
· exact h'
· simp [h] at this
subst e'
exact NFBelow.oadd h'.fst h'.snd h'.lt
· simp [h] at this
exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst (NF.below_of_lt this ⟨⟨_, h'⟩⟩) h₁.lt
#align onote.add_NF_below ONote.add_nfBelow
instance add_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ + o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, h₂⟩⟩ =>
⟨(le_total b₁ b₂).elim (fun h => ⟨b₂, add_nfBelow (h₁.mono h) h₂⟩) fun h =>
⟨b₁, add_nfBelow h₁ (h₂.mono h)⟩⟩
#align onote.add_NF ONote.add_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_add : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ + o₂) = repr o₁ + repr o₂
| 0, o, _, _ => by simp
| oadd e n a, o, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; have h' := repr_add a o
conv_lhs at h' => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
have nf := ONote.add_nf a o
conv at nf => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
conv in _ + o => simp [HAdd.hAdd, Add.add]
cases' h : add a o with e' n' a' <;>
simp only [Add.add, add, addAux, h'.symm, h, add_assoc, repr] at nf h₁ ⊢
have := h₁.fst; haveI := nf.fst; have ee := cmp_compares e e'
cases he: cmp e e' <;> simp only [he, Ordering.compares_gt, Ordering.compares_lt,
Ordering.compares_eq, repr, gt_iff_lt, PNat.add_coe, Nat.cast_add] at ee ⊢
· rw [← add_assoc, @add_absorp _ (repr e') (ω ^ repr e' * (n' : ℕ))]
· have := (h₁.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt
unfold repr at this
cases he': e' <;> simp only [he', zero_def, opow_zero, repr, gt_iff_lt] at this ⊢ <;>
exact lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) this
· simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos (repr e') omega_pos).2
(natCast_le.2 n'.pos)
· rw [ee, ← add_assoc, ← mul_add]
#align onote.repr_add ONote.repr_add
theorem sub_nfBelow : ∀ {o₁ o₂ b}, NFBelow o₁ b → NF o₂ → NFBelow (o₁ - o₂) b
| 0, o, b, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NFBelow.zero
| oadd _ _ _, 0, _, h₁, _ => h₁
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b, h₁, h₂ => by
have h' := sub_nfBelow h₁.snd h₂.snd
simp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub] at h' ⊢
have := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp [sub]
· apply NFBelow.zero
· simp only [h, Ordering.compares_eq] at this
subst e₂
cases (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> simp [sub]
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂ <;> simp [en]
· exact h'.mono (le_of_lt h₁.lt)
· exact NFBelow.zero
· exact NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd h₁.lt
· exact h₁
#align onote.sub_NF_below ONote.sub_nfBelow
instance sub_nf (o₁ o₂) : ∀ [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ - o₂)
| ⟨⟨b₁, h₁⟩⟩, h₂ => ⟨⟨b₁, sub_nfBelow h₁ h₂⟩⟩
#align onote.sub_NF ONote.sub_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_sub : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ - o₂) = repr o₁ - repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (Ordinal.zero_sub _).symm
| oadd e n a, 0, _, _ => (Ordinal.sub_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
haveI := h₁.snd; haveI := h₂.snd; have h' := repr_sub a₁ a₂
conv_lhs at h' => dsimp [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub, sub]
conv_lhs => dsimp only [HSub.hSub, Sub.sub]; dsimp only [sub]
have ee := @cmp_compares _ _ h₁.fst h₂.fst
cases h : cmp e₁ e₂ <;> simp only [h] at ee
· rw [Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2]
· rfl
exact le_of_lt (oadd_lt_oadd_1 h₁ ee)
· change e₁ = e₂ at ee
subst e₂
dsimp only
cases mn : (n₁ : ℕ) - n₂ <;> dsimp only
· by_cases en : n₁ = n₂
· simpa [en]
· simp only [en, ite_false]
exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 <|
le_of_lt <|
oadd_lt_oadd_2 h₁ <|
lt_of_le_of_ne (tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.1 mn) (mt PNat.eq en)).symm
· simp [Nat.succPNat]
rw [(tsub_eq_iff_eq_add_of_le <| le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ mn).1 mn, add_comm,
Nat.cast_add, mul_add, add_assoc, add_sub_add_cancel]
refine
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp h₂.snd'.repr_lt <| le_trans ?_ (le_add_right _ _)).symm
simpa using mul_le_mul_left' (natCast_le.2 <| Nat.succ_pos _) _
· exact
(Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq <|
add_absorp (h₂.below_of_lt ee).repr_lt <| omega_le_oadd _ _ _).symm
#align onote.repr_sub ONote.repr_sub
/-- Multiplication of ordinal notations (correct only for normal input) -/
def mul : ONote → ONote → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| o₁@(oadd e₁ n₁ a₁), oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =>
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (mul o₁ a₂)
#align onote.mul ONote.mul
instance : Mul ONote :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : MulZeroClass ONote where
mul := (· * ·)
zero := 0
zero_mul o := by cases o <;> rfl
mul_zero o := by cases o <;> rfl
theorem oadd_mul (e₁ n₁ a₁ e₂ n₂ a₂) :
oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * oadd e₂ n₂ a₂ =
if e₂ = 0 then oadd e₁ (n₁ * n₂) a₁ else oadd (e₁ + e₂) n₂ (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * a₂) :=
rfl
#align onote.oadd_mul ONote.oadd_mul
theorem oadd_mul_nfBelow {e₁ n₁ a₁ b₁} (h₁ : NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁) b₁) :
∀ {o₂ b₂}, NFBelow o₂ b₂ → NFBelow (oadd e₁ n₁ a₁ * o₂) (repr e₁ + b₂)
| 0, b₂, _ => NFBelow.zero
| oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, b₂, h₂ => by
have IH := oadd_mul_nfBelow h₁ h₂.snd
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, oadd_mul]
· apply NFBelow.oadd h₁.fst h₁.snd
simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr e₁)).2 (lt_of_le_of_lt (Ordinal.zero_le _) h₂.lt)
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
apply NFBelow.oadd
· infer_instance
· rwa [repr_add]
· rw [repr_add, add_lt_add_iff_left]
exact h₂.lt
#align onote.oadd_mul_NF_below ONote.oadd_mul_nfBelow
instance mul_nf : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], NF (o₁ * o₂)
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact NF.zero
| oadd e n a, o, ⟨⟨b₁, hb₁⟩⟩, ⟨⟨b₂, hb₂⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨_, oadd_mul_nfBelow hb₁ hb₂⟩⟩
#align onote.mul_NF ONote.mul_nf
@[simp]
theorem repr_mul : ∀ (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂], repr (o₁ * o₂) = repr o₁ * repr o₂
| 0, o, _, h₂ => by cases o <;> exact (zero_mul _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, 0, _, _ => (mul_zero _).symm
| oadd e₁ n₁ a₁, oadd e₂ n₂ a₂, h₁, h₂ => by
have IH : repr (mul _ _) = _ := @repr_mul _ _ h₁ h₂.snd
conv =>
lhs
simp [(· * ·)]
have ao : repr a₁ + ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) = ω ^ repr e₁ * (n₁ : ℕ) := by
apply add_absorp h₁.snd'.repr_lt
simpa using (Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left <| opow_pos _ omega_pos).2 (natCast_le.2 n₁.2)
by_cases e0 : e₂ = 0 <;> simp [e0, mul]
· cases' Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero n₂.ne_zero with x xe
simp only [xe, h₂.zero_of_zero e0, repr, add_zero]
rw [natCast_succ x, add_mul_succ _ ao, mul_assoc]
· haveI := h₁.fst
haveI := h₂.fst
simp only [Mul.mul, mul, e0, ite_false, repr.eq_2, repr_add, opow_add, IH, repr, mul_add]
rw [← mul_assoc]
congr 2
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [add_mul_limit ao (opow_isLimit_left omega_isLimit this), mul_assoc,
mul_omega_dvd (natCast_pos.2 n₁.pos) (nat_lt_omega _)]
simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)
#align onote.repr_mul ONote.repr_mul
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split' o = (a, n)` means `o = ω * a + n`. -/
def split' : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split' a
(oadd (e - 1) n a', m)
#align onote.split' ONote.split'
/-- Calculate division and remainder of `o` mod ω.
`split o = (a, n)` means `o = a + n`, where `ω ∣ a`. -/
def split : ONote → ONote × ℕ
| 0 => (0, 0)
| oadd e n a =>
if e = 0 then (0, n)
else
let (a', m) := split a
(oadd e n a', m)
#align onote.split ONote.split
/-- `scale x o` is the ordinal notation for `ω ^ x * o`. -/
def scale (x : ONote) : ONote → ONote
| 0 => 0
| oadd e n a => oadd (x + e) n (scale x a)
#align onote.scale ONote.scale
/-- `mulNat o n` is the ordinal notation for `o * n`. -/
def mulNat : ONote → ℕ → ONote
| 0, _ => 0
| _, 0 => 0
| oadd e n a, m + 1 => oadd e (n * m.succPNat) a
#align onote.mul_nat ONote.mulNat
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal
exponentiation in `opow` -/
def opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) : ℕ → ℕ → ONote
| _, 0 => 0
| 0, m + 1 => oadd e m.succPNat 0
| k + 1, m => scale (e + mulNat a0 k) a + (opowAux e a0 a k m)
#align onote.opow_aux ONote.opowAux
/-- Auxiliary definition to compute the ordinal notation for the ordinal
exponentiation in `opow` -/
def opowAux2 (o₂ : ONote) (o₁ : ONote × ℕ) : ONote :=
match o₁ with
| (0, 0) => if o₂ = 0 then 1 else 0
| (0, 1) => 1
| (0, m + 1) =>
let (b', k) := split' o₂
oadd b' (m.succPNat ^ k) 0
| (a@(oadd a0 _ _), m) =>
match split o₂ with
| (b, 0) => oadd (a0 * b) 1 0
| (b, k + 1) =>
let eb := a0 * b
scale (eb + mulNat a0 k) a + opowAux eb a0 (mulNat a m) k m
/-- `opow o₁ o₂` calculates the ordinal notation for
the ordinal exponential `o₁ ^ o₂`. -/
def opow (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : ONote := opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁)
#align onote.opow ONote.opow
instance : Pow ONote ONote :=
⟨opow⟩
theorem opow_def (o₁ o₂ : ONote) : o₁ ^ o₂ = opowAux2 o₂ (split o₁) :=
rfl
#align onote.opow_def ONote.opow_def
theorem split_eq_scale_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → split o = (scale 1 o', m)
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; rfl
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
simp only [split_eq_scale_split' h', and_imp]
have : 1 + (e - 1) = e := by
refine repr_inj.1 ?_
simp only [repr_add, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
repr_sub]
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
refine Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le ?_
have := one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this
exact this
intros
substs o' m
simp [scale, this]
#align onote.split_eq_scale_split' ONote.split_eq_scale_split'
theorem nf_repr_split' : ∀ {o o' m} [NF o], split' o = (o', m) → NF o' ∧ repr o = ω * repr o' + m
| 0, o', m, _, p => by injection p; substs o' m; simp [NF.zero]
| oadd e n a, o', m, h, p => by
by_cases e0 : e = 0 <;> simp [e0, split, split'] at p ⊢
· rcases p with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
simp [h.zero_of_zero e0, NF.zero]
· revert p
cases' h' : split' a with a' m'
haveI := h.fst
haveI := h.snd
cases' nf_repr_split' h' with IH₁ IH₂
simp only [IH₂, and_imp]
intros
substs o' m
have : (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e = ω ^ (1 : Ordinal.{0}) * ω ^ (repr e - 1) := by
have := mt repr_inj.1 e0
rw [← opow_add, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 this)]
refine ⟨NF.oadd (by infer_instance) _ ?_, ?_⟩
· simp at this ⊢
refine
IH₁.below_of_lt'
((Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left omega_pos).1 <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ m') ?_)
rw [← this, ← IH₂]
exact h.snd'.repr_lt
· rw [this]
simp [mul_add, mul_assoc, add_assoc]
#align onote.NF_repr_split' ONote.nf_repr_split'
theorem scale_eq_mul (x) [NF x] : ∀ (o) [NF o], scale x o = oadd x 1 0 * o
| 0, _ => rfl
| oadd e n a, h => by
simp only [HMul.hMul]; simp only [scale]
haveI := h.snd
by_cases e0 : e = 0
· simp_rw [scale_eq_mul]
simp [Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, e0, h.zero_of_zero,
show x + 0 = x from repr_inj.1 (by simp)]
· simp [e0, Mul.mul, mul, scale_eq_mul, (· * ·)]
#align onote.scale_eq_mul ONote.scale_eq_mul
instance nf_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : NF (scale x o) := by
rw [scale_eq_mul]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_scale ONote.nf_scale
@[simp]
theorem repr_scale (x) [NF x] (o) [NF o] : repr (scale x o) = ω ^ repr x * repr o := by
simp only [scale_eq_mul, repr_mul, repr, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero]
#align onote.repr_scale ONote.repr_scale
theorem nf_repr_split {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : NF o' ∧ repr o = repr o' + m := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
cases' nf_repr_split' e with s₁ s₂
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; substs o' n
simp only [repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero,
opow_one, s₂.symm, and_true]
infer_instance
#align onote.NF_repr_split ONote.nf_repr_split
theorem split_dvd {o o' m} [NF o] (h : split o = (o', m)) : ω ∣ repr o' := by
cases' e : split' o with a n
rw [split_eq_scale_split' e] at h
injection h; subst o'
cases nf_repr_split' e; simp
#align onote.split_dvd ONote.split_dvd
theorem split_add_lt {o e n a m} [NF o] (h : split o = (oadd e n a, m)) :
repr a + m < ω ^ repr e := by
cases' nf_repr_split h with h₁ h₂
cases' h₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd h) with e0 d
apply principal_add_omega_opow _ h₁.snd'.repr_lt (lt_of_lt_of_le (nat_lt_omega _) _)
simpa using opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)
#align onote.split_add_lt ONote.split_add_lt
@[simp]
theorem mulNat_eq_mul (n o) : mulNat o n = o * ofNat n := by cases o <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align onote.mul_nat_eq_mul ONote.mulNat_eq_mul
instance nf_mulNat (o) [NF o] (n) : NF (mulNat o n) := by simp; exact ONote.mul_nf o (ofNat n)
#align onote.NF_mul_nat ONote.nf_mulNat
instance nf_opowAux (e a0 a) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] : ∀ k m, NF (opowAux e a0 a k m) := by
intro k m
unfold opowAux
cases' m with m m
· cases k <;> exact NF.zero
cases' k with k k
· exact NF.oadd_zero _ _
· haveI := nf_opowAux e a0 a k
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero m, IsEmpty.forall_iff, mulNat_eq_mul]; infer_instance
#align onote.NF_opow_aux ONote.nf_opowAux
instance nf_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : NF (o₁ ^ o₂) := by
cases' e₁ : split o₁ with a m
have na := (nf_repr_split e₁).1
cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
haveI := (nf_repr_split' e₂).1
cases' a with a0 n a'
· cases' m with m
· by_cases o₂ = 0 <;> simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, *] <;> decide
· by_cases m = 0
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, *, zero_def]
decide
· simp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, pow, opow, opowAux2, mulNat_eq_mul, ofNat, *]
infer_instance
· simp [(· ^ ·),Pow.pow,pow, opow, opowAux2, e₁, e₂, split_eq_scale_split' e₂]
have := na.fst
cases' k with k <;> simp
· infer_instance
· cases k <;> cases m <;> infer_instance
#align onote.NF_opow ONote.nf_opow
theorem scale_opowAux (e a0 a : ONote) [NF e] [NF a0] [NF a] :
∀ k m, repr (opowAux e a0 a k m) = ω ^ repr e * repr (opowAux 0 a0 a k m)
| 0, m => by cases m <;> simp [opowAux]
| k + 1, m => by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [h, opowAux, mul_add, opow_add, mul_assoc, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
· -- Porting note: rewrote proof
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [opowAux]; swap
· assumption
rw [repr_add, repr_scale, scale_opowAux _ _ _ k]
simp only [repr_add, repr_scale, opow_add, mul_assoc, zero_add, mul_add]
#align onote.scale_opow_aux ONote.scale_opowAux
theorem repr_opow_aux₁ {e a} [Ne : NF e] [Na : NF a] {a' : Ordinal} (e0 : repr e ≠ 0)
(h : a' < (ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e) (aa : repr a = a') (n : ℕ+) :
((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr e * (n : ℕ) + a') ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) =
(ω ^ repr e) ^ (ω : Ordinal.{0}) := by
subst aa
have No := Ne.oadd n (Na.below_of_lt' h)
have := omega_le_oadd e n a
rw [repr] at this
refine le_antisymm ?_ (opow_le_opow_left _ this)
apply (opow_le_of_limit ((opow_pos _ omega_pos).trans_le this).ne' omega_isLimit).2
intro b l
have := (No.below_of_lt (lt_succ _)).repr_lt
rw [repr] at this
apply (opow_le_opow_left b <| this.le).trans
rw [← opow_mul, ← opow_mul]
apply opow_le_opow_right omega_pos
rcases le_or_lt ω (repr e) with h | h
· apply (mul_le_mul_left' (le_succ b) _).trans
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, add_mul_succ _ (one_add_of_omega_le h), add_one_eq_succ, succ_le_iff,
Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)]
exact omega_isLimit.2 _ l
· apply (principal_mul_omega (omega_isLimit.2 _ h) l).le.trans
simpa using mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0) ω
#align onote.repr_opow_aux₁ ONote.repr_opow_aux₁
section
-- Porting note: `R'` is used in the proof but marked as an unused variable.
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
theorem repr_opow_aux₂ {a0 a'} [N0 : NF a0] [Na' : NF a'] (m : ℕ) (d : ω ∣ repr a')
(e0 : repr a0 ≠ 0) (h : repr a' + m < (ω ^ repr a0)) (n : ℕ+) (k : ℕ) :
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
(k ≠ 0 → R < ((ω ^ repr a0) ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧
((ω ^ repr a0) ^ (k : Ordinal)) * ((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a') + R =
((ω ^ repr a0) * (n : ℕ) + repr a' + m) ^ succ (k : Ordinal) := by
intro R'
haveI No : NF (oadd a0 n a') :=
N0.oadd n (Na'.below_of_lt' <| lt_of_le_of_lt (le_add_right _ _) h)
induction' k with k IH
· cases m <;> simp [R', opowAux]
-- rename R => R'
let R := repr (opowAux 0 a0 (oadd a0 n a' * ofNat m) k m)
let ω0 := ω ^ repr a0
let α' := ω0 * n + repr a'
change (k ≠ 0 → R < (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))) ∧ (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R
= (α' + m) ^ (succ ↑k : Ordinal) at IH
have RR : R' = ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) * (α' * m) + R := by
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp only [R, R', h, ONote.ofNat, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, ONote.repr, mul_zero,
ONote.opowAux, add_zero]
· simp only [R', ONote.repr_scale, ONote.repr, ONote.mulNat_eq_mul, ONote.opowAux,
ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_mul, ONote.repr_add, Ordinal.opow_mul, ONote.zero_add]
have α0 : 0 < α' := by simpa [lt_def, repr] using oadd_pos a0 n a'
have ω00 : 0 < ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal) := opow_pos _ (opow_pos _ omega_pos)
have Rl : R < ω ^ (repr a0 * succ ↑k) := by
by_cases k0 : k = 0
· simp [R, k0]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (opow_le_opow_right omega_pos (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0))
cases' m with m <;> simp [opowAux, omega_pos]
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, ← Nat.cast_succ]
apply nat_lt_omega
· rw [opow_mul]
exact IH.1 k0
refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [RR, ← opow_mul _ _ (succ k.succ)]
have e0 := Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 e0
have rr0 : 0 < repr a0 + repr a0 := lt_of_lt_of_le e0 (le_add_left _ _)
apply principal_add_omega_opow
· simp [opow_mul, opow_add, mul_assoc]
rw [Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00, ← Ordinal.opow_add]
have : _ < ω ^ (repr a0 + repr a0) := (No.below_of_lt ?_).repr_lt
· exact mul_lt_omega_opow rr0 this (nat_lt_omega _)
· simpa using (add_lt_add_iff_left (repr a0)).2 e0
· exact
lt_of_lt_of_le Rl
(opow_le_opow_right omega_pos <|
mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 (natCast_le.2 (le_of_lt k.lt_succ_self))) _)
calc
(ω0 ^ (k.succ : Ordinal)) * α' + R'
_ = (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' * m + R) := by
rw [natCast_succ, RR, ← mul_assoc]
_ = ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * α' + ((ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)) * α' + R) * m := ?_
_ = (α' + m) ^ succ (k.succ : Ordinal) := by rw [← mul_add, natCast_succ, opow_succ, IH.2]
congr 1
· have αd : ω ∣ α' :=
dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (by simpa using opow_dvd_opow ω (one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 e0)) _) d
rw [mul_add (ω0 ^ (k : Ordinal)), add_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← opow_succ,
add_mul_limit _ (isLimit_iff_omega_dvd.2 ⟨ne_of_gt α0, αd⟩), mul_assoc,
@mul_omega_dvd n (natCast_pos.2 n.pos) (nat_lt_omega _) _ αd]
apply @add_absorp _ (repr a0 * succ ↑k)
· refine principal_add_omega_opow _ ?_ Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left ω00]
exact No.snd'.repr_lt
· have := mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 <| natCast_pos.2 n.pos) (ω0 ^ succ (k : Ordinal))
rw [opow_mul]
simpa [-opow_succ]
· cases m
· have : R = 0 := by cases k <;> simp [R, opowAux]
simp [this]
· rw [natCast_succ, add_mul_succ]
apply add_absorp Rl
rw [opow_mul, opow_succ]
apply mul_le_mul_left'
simpa [repr] using omega_le_oadd a0 n a'
#align onote.repr_opow_aux₂ ONote.repr_opow_aux₂
end
theorem repr_opow (o₁ o₂) [NF o₁] [NF o₂] : repr (o₁ ^ o₂) = repr o₁ ^ repr o₂ := by
cases' e₁ : split o₁ with a m
cases' nf_repr_split e₁ with N₁ r₁
cases' a with a0 n a'
· cases' m with m
· by_cases h : o₂ = 0 <;> simp [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁]
have := mt repr_inj.1 h
rw [zero_opow this]
· cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
cases' nf_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂
by_cases h : m = 0
· simp [opow_def, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, ← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero]
simp only [opow_def, opowAux2, opow, e₁, h, r₁, e₂, r₂, repr,
opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_zero, _root_.zero_add, mul_one,
add_zero, one_opow, npow_eq_pow]
rw [opow_add, opow_mul, opow_omega, add_one_eq_succ]
· congr
conv_lhs =>
dsimp [(· ^ ·)]
simp [Pow.pow, opow, Ordinal.succ_ne_zero]
· simpa [Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
· rw [← Nat.cast_succ, lt_omega]
exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
· haveI := N₁.fst
haveI := N₁.snd
cases' N₁.of_dvd_omega (split_dvd e₁) with a00 ad
have al := split_add_lt e₁
have aa : repr (a' + ofNat m) = repr a' + m := by
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, ONote.repr_ofNat, ONote.repr_add]
cases' e₂ : split' o₂ with b' k
cases' nf_repr_split' e₂ with _ r₂
simp only [opow_def, opow, e₁, r₁, split_eq_scale_split' e₂, opowAux2, repr]
cases' k with k
· simp [r₂, opow_mul, repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, add_assoc]
· simp? [r₂, opow_add, opow_mul, mul_assoc, add_assoc, -repr] says
simp only [mulNat_eq_mul, repr_add, repr_scale, repr_mul, repr_ofNat, opow_add, opow_mul,
mul_assoc, add_assoc, r₂, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_eq_succ, opow_succ]
simp only [repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, add_zero, opow_one]
rw [repr_opow_aux₁ a00 al aa, scale_opowAux]
simp only [repr_mul, repr_scale, repr, opow_zero, Nat.succPNat_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
add_zero, opow_one, opow_mul]
rw [← mul_add, ← add_assoc ((ω : Ordinal.{0}) ^ repr a0 * (n : ℕ))]
congr 1
rw [← opow_succ]
exact (repr_opow_aux₂ _ ad a00 al _ _).2
#align onote.repr_opow ONote.repr_opow
/-- Given an ordinal, returns `inl none` for `0`, `inl (some a)` for `a+1`, and
`inr f` for a limit ordinal `a`, where `f i` is a sequence converging to `a`. -/
def fundamentalSequence : ONote → Sum (Option ONote) (ℕ → ONote)
| zero => Sum.inl none
| oadd a m b =>
match fundamentalSequence b with
| Sum.inr f => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m (f i)
| Sum.inl (some b') => Sum.inl (some (oadd a m b'))
| Sum.inl none =>
match fundamentalSequence a, m.natPred with
| Sum.inl none, 0 => Sum.inl (some zero)
| Sum.inl none, m + 1 => Sum.inl (some (oadd zero m.succPNat zero))
| Sum.inl (some a'), 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a' i.succPNat zero
| Sum.inl (some a'), m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd a' i.succPNat zero)
| Sum.inr f, 0 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd (f i) 1 zero
| Sum.inr f, m + 1 => Sum.inr fun i => oadd a m.succPNat (oadd (f i) 1 zero)
#align onote.fundamental_sequence ONote.fundamentalSequence
private theorem exists_lt_add {α} [hα : Nonempty α] {o : Ordinal} {f : α → Ordinal}
(H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) {b : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b + o) : ∃ i, a < b + f i := by
cases' lt_or_le a b with h h'
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := id hα
exact ⟨i, h.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
· rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left] at h
refine (H h).imp fun i H => ?_
rwa [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h', add_lt_add_iff_left]
private theorem exists_lt_mul_omega' {o : Ordinal} ⦃a⦄ (h : a < o * ω) :
∃ i : ℕ, a < o * ↑i + o := by
obtain ⟨i, hi, h'⟩ := (lt_mul_of_limit omega_isLimit).1 h
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := lt_omega.1 hi
exact ⟨i, h'.trans_le (le_add_right _ _)⟩
private theorem exists_lt_omega_opow' {α} {o b : Ordinal} (hb : 1 < b) (ho : o.IsLimit)
{f : α → Ordinal} (H : ∀ ⦃a⦄, a < o → ∃ i, a < f i) ⦃a⦄ (h : a < b ^ o) :
∃ i, a < b ^ f i := by
obtain ⟨d, hd, h'⟩ := (lt_opow_of_limit (zero_lt_one.trans hb).ne' ho).1 h
exact (H hd).imp fun i hi => h'.trans <| (opow_lt_opow_iff_right hb).2 hi
/-- The property satisfied by `fundamentalSequence o`:
* `inl none` means `o = 0`
* `inl (some a)` means `o = succ a`
* `inr f` means `o` is a limit ordinal and `f` is a
strictly increasing sequence which converges to `o` -/
def FundamentalSequenceProp (o : ONote) : Sum (Option ONote) (ℕ → ONote) → Prop
| Sum.inl none => o = 0
| Sum.inl (some a) => o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF)
| Sum.inr f =>
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧ ∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr
#align onote.fundamental_sequence_prop ONote.FundamentalSequenceProp
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_none (o) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl none) ↔ o = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_some (o a) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inl (some a)) ↔ o.repr = succ a.repr ∧ (o.NF → a.NF) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem fundamentalSequenceProp_inr (o f) :
FundamentalSequenceProp o (Sum.inr f) ↔
o.repr.IsLimit ∧
(∀ i, f i < f (i + 1) ∧ f i < o ∧ (o.NF → (f i).NF)) ∧
∀ a, a < o.repr → ∃ i, a < (f i).repr :=
Iff.rfl
attribute
[eqns
fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_none
fundamentalSequenceProp_inl_some
fundamentalSequenceProp_inr]
FundamentalSequenceProp
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Notation.lean | 1,091 | 1,148 | theorem fundamentalSequence_has_prop (o) : FundamentalSequenceProp o (fundamentalSequence o) := by |
induction' o with a m b iha ihb; · exact rfl
rw [fundamentalSequence]
rcases e : b.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | b'⟩ | f) <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at ihb
· rcases e : a.fundamentalSequence with (⟨_ | a'⟩ | f) <;> cases' e' : m.natPred with m' <;>
simp only [FundamentalSequenceProp] <;>
rw [e, FundamentalSequenceProp] at iha <;>
(try rw [show m = 1 by
have := PNat.natPred_add_one m; rw [e'] at this; exact PNat.coe_inj.1 this.symm]) <;>
(try rw [show m = (m' + 1).succPNat by
rw [← e', ← PNat.coe_inj, Nat.succPNat_coe, ← Nat.add_one, PNat.natPred_add_one]]) <;>
simp only [repr, iha, ihb, opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega, add_lt_add_iff_left, add_zero,
eq_self_iff_true, lt_add_iff_pos_right, lt_def, mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_succ,
Nat.succPNat_coe, opow_succ, opow_zero, mul_add_one, PNat.one_coe, succ_zero,
true_and_iff, _root_.zero_add, zero_def]
· decide
· exact ⟨rfl, inferInstance⟩
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega_pos
refine
⟨mul_isLimit this omega_isLimit, fun i =>
⟨this, ?_, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)⟩, exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩
rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· have := opow_pos (repr a') omega_pos
refine
⟨add_isLimit _ (mul_isLimit this omega_isLimit), fun i => ⟨this, ?_, ?_⟩,
exists_lt_add exists_lt_mul_omega'⟩
· rw [← mul_succ, ← natCast_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· refine fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (iha.2 H.fst)))
rw [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, iha.1, opow_succ, Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left this]
apply nat_lt_omega
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine ⟨opow_isLimit one_lt_omega h1, fun i => ?_, exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
exact ⟨h4, h5, fun H => @NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)⟩
· rcases iha with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
refine
⟨add_isLimit _ (opow_isLimit one_lt_omega h1), fun i => ?_,
exists_lt_add (exists_lt_omega_opow' one_lt_omega h1 h3)⟩
obtain ⟨h4, h5, h6⟩ := h2 i
refine ⟨h4, h5, fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (@NF.oadd_zero _ _ (h6 H.fst)))⟩
rwa [repr, ← zero_def, repr, add_zero, PNat.one_coe, Nat.cast_one, mul_one,
opow_lt_opow_iff_right one_lt_omega]
· refine ⟨by
rw [repr, ihb.1, add_succ, repr], fun H => H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' ?_ (ihb.2 H.snd))⟩
have := H.snd'.repr_lt
rw [ihb.1] at this
exact (lt_succ _).trans this
· rcases ihb with ⟨h1, h2, h3⟩
simp only [repr]
exact
⟨Ordinal.add_isLimit _ h1, fun i =>
⟨oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).1, oadd_lt_oadd_3 (h2 i).2.1, fun H =>
H.fst.oadd _ (NF.below_of_lt' (lt_trans (h2 i).2.1 H.snd'.repr_lt) ((h2 i).2.2 H.snd))⟩,
exists_lt_add h3⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.List
#align_import data.list.cycle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7413128c3bcb3b0818e3e18720abc9ea3100fb49"
/-!
# Cycles of a list
Lists have an equivalence relation of whether they are rotational permutations of one another.
This relation is defined as `IsRotated`.
Based on this, we define the quotient of lists by the rotation relation, called `Cycle`.
We also define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
namespace List
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α]
/-- Return the `z` such that `x :: z :: _` appears in `xs`, or `default` if there is no such `z`. -/
def nextOr : ∀ (_ : List α) (_ _ : α), α
| [], _, default => default
| [_], _, default => default
-- Handles the not-found and the wraparound case
| y :: z :: xs, x, default => if x = y then z else nextOr (z :: xs) x default
#align list.next_or List.nextOr
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_nil (x d : α) : nextOr [] x d = d :=
rfl
#align list.next_or_nil List.nextOr_nil
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_singleton (x y d : α) : nextOr [y] x d = d :=
rfl
#align list.next_or_singleton List.nextOr_singleton
@[simp]
theorem nextOr_self_cons_cons (xs : List α) (x y d : α) : nextOr (x :: y :: xs) x d = y :=
if_pos rfl
#align list.next_or_self_cons_cons List.nextOr_self_cons_cons
theorem nextOr_cons_of_ne (xs : List α) (y x d : α) (h : x ≠ y) :
nextOr (y :: xs) x d = nextOr xs x d := by
cases' xs with z zs
· rfl
· exact if_neg h
#align list.next_or_cons_of_ne List.nextOr_cons_of_ne
/-- `nextOr` does not depend on the default value, if the next value appears. -/
theorem nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne (xs : List α) (x d d' : α) (x_mem : x ∈ xs)
(x_ne : x ≠ xs.getLast (ne_nil_of_mem x_mem)) : nextOr xs x d = nextOr xs x d' := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· cases x_mem
cases' ys with z zs
· simp at x_mem x_ne
contradiction
by_cases h : x = y
· rw [h, nextOr_self_cons_cons, nextOr_self_cons_cons]
· rw [nextOr, nextOr, IH]
· simpa [h] using x_mem
· simpa using x_ne
#align list.next_or_eq_next_or_of_mem_of_ne List.nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne
theorem mem_of_nextOr_ne {xs : List α} {x d : α} (h : nextOr xs x d ≠ d) : x ∈ xs := by
induction' xs with y ys IH
· simp at h
cases' ys with z zs
· simp at h
· by_cases hx : x = y
· simp [hx]
· rw [nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hx] at h
simpa [hx] using IH h
#align list.mem_of_next_or_ne List.mem_of_nextOr_ne
theorem nextOr_concat {xs : List α} {x : α} (d : α) (h : x ∉ xs) : nextOr (xs ++ [x]) x d = d := by
induction' xs with z zs IH
· simp
· obtain ⟨hz, hzs⟩ := not_or.mp (mt mem_cons.2 h)
rw [cons_append, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hz, IH hzs]
#align list.next_or_concat List.nextOr_concat
theorem nextOr_mem {xs : List α} {x d : α} (hd : d ∈ xs) : nextOr xs x d ∈ xs := by
revert hd
suffices ∀ xs' : List α, (∀ x ∈ xs, x ∈ xs') → d ∈ xs' → nextOr xs x d ∈ xs' by
exact this xs fun _ => id
intro xs' hxs' hd
induction' xs with y ys ih
· exact hd
cases' ys with z zs
· exact hd
rw [nextOr]
split_ifs with h
· exact hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ (mem_cons_self _ _))
· exact ih fun _ h => hxs' _ (mem_cons_of_mem _ h)
#align list.next_or_mem List.nextOr_mem
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the next
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
For example:
* `next [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3] 3 _ = 1`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 2, 3, 2] 2 _ = 3`
* `next [1, 1, 2, 3, 2] 1 _ = 1`
-/
def next (l : List α) (x : α) (h : x ∈ l) : α :=
nextOr l x (l.get ⟨0, length_pos_of_mem h⟩)
#align list.next List.next
/-- Given an element `x : α` of `l : List α` such that `x ∈ l`, get the previous
element of `l`. This works from head to tail, (including a check for last element)
so it will match on first hit, ignoring later duplicates.
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3] 1 _ = 3`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 2, 4] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 2, 3, 4, 2] 2 _ = 1`
* `prev [1, 1, 2] 1 _ = 2`
-/
def prev : ∀ l : List α, ∀ x ∈ l, α
| [], _, h => by simp at h
| [y], _, _ => y
| y :: z :: xs, x, h =>
if hx : x = y then getLast (z :: xs) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
else if x = z then y else prev (z :: xs) x (by simpa [hx] using h)
#align list.prev List.prev
variable (l : List α) (x : α)
@[simp]
theorem next_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : next [y] x h = y :=
rfl
#align list.next_singleton List.next_singleton
@[simp]
theorem prev_singleton (x y : α) (h : x ∈ [y]) : prev [y] x h = y :=
rfl
#align list.prev_singleton List.prev_singleton
theorem next_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
next (y :: z :: l) x h = z := by rw [next, nextOr, if_pos hx]
#align list.next_cons_cons_eq' List.next_cons_cons_eq'
@[simp]
theorem next_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) : next (x :: z :: l) x h = z :=
next_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
#align list.next_cons_cons_eq List.next_cons_cons_eq
theorem next_ne_head_ne_getLast (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x ≠ getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) :
next (y :: l) x h = next l x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
rw [next, next, nextOr_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ hy, nextOr_eq_nextOr_of_mem_of_ne]
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
exact ne_nil_of_mem (by assumption)
· rwa [getLast_cons] at hx
#align list.next_ne_head_ne_last List.next_ne_head_ne_getLast
theorem next_cons_concat (y : α) (hy : x ≠ y) (hx : x ∉ l)
(h : x ∈ y :: l ++ [x] := mem_append_right _ (mem_singleton_self x)) :
next (y :: l ++ [x]) x h = y := by
rw [next, nextOr_concat]
· rfl
· simp [hy, hx]
#align list.next_cons_concat List.next_cons_concat
theorem next_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ l) (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: l) (hy : x ≠ y)
(hx : x = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)) (hl : Nodup l) : next (y :: l) x h = y := by
rw [next, get, ← dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil y l), hx, nextOr_concat]
subst hx
intro H
obtain ⟨⟨_ | k, hk⟩, hk'⟩ := get_of_mem H
· rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← get?_eq_get, dropLast_eq_take, get?_take, get?_zero, head?_cons,
Option.some_inj] at hk'
· exact hy (Eq.symm hk')
rw [length_cons, Nat.pred_succ]
exact length_pos_of_mem (by assumption)
suffices k + 1 = l.length by simp [this] at hk
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at hk
· rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hl
rw [length, Nat.succ_inj']
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq <| @hl ⟨k, Nat.lt_of_succ_lt <| by simpa using hk⟩
⟨tl.length, by simp⟩ ?_
rw [← Option.some_inj] at hk'
rw [← get?_eq_get, dropLast_eq_take, get?_take, get?, get?_eq_get, Option.some_inj] at hk'
· rw [hk']
simp only [getLast_eq_get, length_cons, ge_iff_le, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub,
nonpos_iff_eq_zero, add_eq_zero_iff, and_false, Nat.sub_zero, get_cons_succ]
simpa using hk
#align list.next_last_cons List.next_getLast_cons
theorem prev_getLast_cons' (y : α) (hxy : x ∈ y :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: l) x hxy = getLast (y :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by cases l <;> simp [prev, hx]
#align list.prev_last_cons' List.prev_getLast_cons'
@[simp]
theorem prev_getLast_cons (h : x ∈ x :: l) :
prev (x :: l) x h = getLast (x :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_getLast_cons' l x x h rfl
#align list.prev_last_cons List.prev_getLast_cons
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hx : x = y) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) := by rw [prev, dif_pos hx]
#align list.prev_cons_cons_eq' List.prev_cons_cons_eq'
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem prev_cons_cons_eq (z : α) (h : x ∈ x :: z :: l) :
prev (x :: z :: l) x h = getLast (z :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) :=
prev_cons_cons_eq' l x x z h rfl
#align list.prev_cons_cons_eq List.prev_cons_cons_eq
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne' (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x = z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = y := by
cases l
· simp [prev, hy, hz]
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_pos hz]
#align list.prev_cons_cons_of_ne' List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne'
theorem prev_cons_cons_of_ne (y : α) (h : x ∈ y :: x :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) :
prev (y :: x :: l) x h = y :=
prev_cons_cons_of_ne' _ _ _ _ _ hy rfl
#align list.prev_cons_cons_of_ne List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne
theorem prev_ne_cons_cons (y z : α) (h : x ∈ y :: z :: l) (hy : x ≠ y) (hz : x ≠ z) :
prev (y :: z :: l) x h = prev (z :: l) x (by simpa [hy] using h) := by
cases l
· simp [hy, hz] at h
· rw [prev, dif_neg hy, if_neg hz]
#align list.prev_ne_cons_cons List.prev_ne_cons_cons
theorem next_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.next x h ∈ l :=
nextOr_mem (get_mem _ _ _)
#align list.next_mem List.next_mem
theorem prev_mem (h : x ∈ l) : l.prev x h ∈ l := by
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at h
induction' tl with hd' tl hl generalizing hd
· simp
· by_cases hx : x = hd
· simp only [hx, prev_cons_cons_eq]
exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (getLast_mem _)
· rw [prev, dif_neg hx]
split_ifs with hm
· exact mem_cons_self _ _
· exact mem_cons_of_mem _ (hl _ _)
#align list.prev_mem List.prev_mem
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
theorem next_get : ∀ (l : List α) (_h : Nodup l) (i : Fin l.length),
next l (l.get i) (get_mem _ _ _) = l.get ⟨(i + 1) % l.length,
Nat.mod_lt _ (i.1.zero_le.trans_lt i.2)⟩
| [], _, i => by simpa using i.2
| [_], _, _ => by simp
| x::y::l, _h, ⟨0, h0⟩ => by
have h₁ : get (x :: y :: l) { val := 0, isLt := h0 } = x := by simp
rw [next_cons_cons_eq' _ _ _ _ _ h₁]
simp
| x::y::l, hn, ⟨i+1, hi⟩ => by
have hx' : (x :: y :: l).get ⟨i+1, hi⟩ ≠ x := by
intro H
suffices (i + 1 : ℕ) = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_injective_get] at hn
refine Fin.val_eq_of_eq (@hn ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ ⟨0, by simp⟩ ?_)
simpa using H
have hi' : i ≤ l.length := Nat.le_of_lt_succ (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.1 hi)
rcases hi'.eq_or_lt with (hi' | hi')
· subst hi'
rw [next_getLast_cons]
· simp [hi', get]
· rw [get_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _ _
· exact hx'
· simp [getLast_eq_get]
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [next_ne_head_ne_getLast _ _ _ _ _ hx']
· simp only [get_cons_succ]
rw [next_get (y::l), ← get_cons_succ (a := x)]
· congr
dsimp
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'))]
· simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff.2 hi'), Nat.succ_eq_add_one, hi']
· exact hn.of_cons
· rw [getLast_eq_get]
intro h
have := nodup_iff_injective_get.1 hn h
simp at this; simp [this] at hi'
· rw [get_cons_succ]; exact get_mem _ _ _
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated next_get (since := "2023-01-27")]
theorem next_nthLe (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
next l (l.nthLe n hn) (nthLe_mem _ _ _) =
l.nthLe ((n + 1) % l.length) (Nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) :=
next_get l h ⟨n, hn⟩
#align list.next_nth_le List.next_nthLe
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem prev_nthLe (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (n : ℕ) (hn : n < l.length) :
prev l (l.nthLe n hn) (nthLe_mem _ _ _) =
l.nthLe ((n + (l.length - 1)) % l.length) (Nat.mod_lt _ (n.zero_le.trans_lt hn)) := by
cases' l with x l
· simp at hn
induction' l with y l hl generalizing n x
· simp
· rcases n with (_ | _ | n)
· simp [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, List.prev_cons_cons_eq, Nat.zero_eq, List.length,
List.nthLe, Nat.succ_add_sub_one, zero_add, getLast_eq_get,
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.succ_lt_succ l.length.lt_succ_self)]
· simp only [mem_cons, nodup_cons] at h
push_neg at h
simp only [List.prev_cons_cons_of_ne _ _ _ _ h.left.left.symm, Nat.zero_eq, List.length,
List.nthLe, add_comm, eq_self_iff_true, Nat.succ_add_sub_one, Nat.mod_self, zero_add,
List.get]
· rw [prev_ne_cons_cons]
· convert hl n.succ y h.of_cons (Nat.le_of_succ_le_succ hn) using 1
have : ∀ k hk, (y :: l).nthLe k hk = (x :: y :: l).nthLe (k + 1) (Nat.succ_lt_succ hk) := by
intros
simp [List.nthLe]
rw [this]
congr
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, length]
simp only [length, Nat.succ_lt_succ_iff] at hn
set k := l.length
rw [Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.succ_add, ← Nat.add_succ _ k,
Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt hn)
· intro H
suffices n.succ.succ = 0 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_nthLe_inj] at h
refine h _ _ hn Nat.succ_pos' ?_
simpa using H
· intro H
suffices n.succ.succ = 1 by simpa
rw [nodup_iff_nthLe_inj] at h
refine h _ _ hn (Nat.succ_lt_succ Nat.succ_pos') ?_
simpa using H
#align list.prev_nth_le List.prev_nthLe
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem pmap_next_eq_rotate_one (h : Nodup l) : (l.pmap l.next fun _ h => h) = l.rotate 1 := by
apply List.ext_nthLe
· simp
· intros
rw [nthLe_pmap, nthLe_rotate, next_nthLe _ h]
#align list.pmap_next_eq_rotate_one List.pmap_next_eq_rotate_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one (h : Nodup l) :
(l.pmap l.prev fun _ h => h) = l.rotate (l.length - 1) := by
apply List.ext_nthLe
· simp
· intro n hn hn'
rw [nthLe_rotate, nthLe_pmap, prev_nthLe _ h]
#align list.pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one List.pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem prev_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l (next l x hx) (next_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nthLe_of_mem hx
simp only [next_nthLe, prev_nthLe, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at hx
· have : (n + 1 + length tl) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at hn
rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp only [length_cons, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, this]
#align list.prev_next List.prev_next
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem next_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l (prev l x hx) (prev_mem _ _ _) = x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩ := nthLe_of_mem hx
simp only [next_nthLe, prev_nthLe, h, Nat.mod_add_mod]
cases' l with hd tl
· simp at hx
· have : (n + length tl + 1) % (length tl + 1) = n := by
rw [length_cons, Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at hn
rw [add_assoc, Nat.add_mod_right, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hn]
simp [this]
#align list.next_prev List.next_prev
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
prev l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nthLe_of_mem hx
have lpos : 0 < l.length := k.zero_le.trans_lt hk
have key : l.length - 1 - k < l.length := by omega
rw [← nthLe_pmap l.next (fun _ h => h) (by simpa using hk)]
simp_rw [← nthLe_reverse l k (key.trans_le (by simp)), pmap_next_eq_rotate_one _ h]
rw [← nthLe_pmap l.reverse.prev fun _ h => h]
· simp_rw [pmap_prev_eq_rotate_length_sub_one _ (nodup_reverse.mpr h), rotate_reverse,
length_reverse, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos'),
Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.succ_le_of_lt lpos)]
rw [← nthLe_reverse]
· simp [Nat.sub_sub_self (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hk)]
· simpa using (Nat.sub_le _ _).trans_lt (Nat.sub_lt lpos Nat.succ_pos')
· simpa
#align list.prev_reverse_eq_next List.prev_reverse_eq_next
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (l : List α) (h : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
next l.reverse x (mem_reverse.mpr hx) = prev l x hx := by
convert (prev_reverse_eq_next l.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr h) x (mem_reverse.mpr hx)).symm
exact (reverse_reverse l).symm
#align list.next_reverse_eq_prev List.next_reverse_eq_prev
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem isRotated_next_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.next x hx = l'.next x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk, rfl⟩ := nthLe_of_mem hx
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := id h
rw [next_nthLe _ hn]
simp_rw [← nthLe_rotate' _ n k]
rw [next_nthLe _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn), ← nthLe_rotate' _ n]
simp [add_assoc]
#align list.is_rotated_next_eq List.isRotated_next_eq
theorem isRotated_prev_eq {l l' : List α} (h : l ~r l') (hn : Nodup l) {x : α} (hx : x ∈ l) :
l.prev x hx = l'.prev x (h.mem_iff.mp hx) := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev _ hn, ← next_reverse_eq_prev _ (h.nodup_iff.mp hn)]
exact isRotated_next_eq h.reverse (nodup_reverse.mpr hn) _
#align list.is_rotated_prev_eq List.isRotated_prev_eq
end List
open List
/-- `Cycle α` is the quotient of `List α` by cyclic permutation.
Duplicates are allowed.
-/
def Cycle (α : Type*) : Type _ :=
Quotient (IsRotated.setoid α)
#align cycle Cycle
namespace Cycle
variable {α : Type*}
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- The coercion from `List α` to `Cycle α` -/
@[coe] def ofList : List α → Cycle α :=
Quot.mk _
instance : Coe (List α) (Cycle α) :=
⟨ofList⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_coe {l₁ l₂ : List α} : (l₁ : Cycle α) = (l₂ : Cycle α) ↔ l₁ ~r l₂ :=
@Quotient.eq _ (IsRotated.setoid _) _ _
#align cycle.coe_eq_coe Cycle.coe_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quot.mk _ l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
#align cycle.mk_eq_coe Cycle.mk_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk''_eq_coe (l : List α) : Quotient.mk'' l = (l : Cycle α) :=
rfl
#align cycle.mk'_eq_coe Cycle.mk''_eq_coe
theorem coe_cons_eq_coe_append (l : List α) (a : α) :
(↑(a :: l) : Cycle α) = (↑(l ++ [a]) : Cycle α) :=
Quot.sound ⟨1, by rw [rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero]⟩
#align cycle.coe_cons_eq_coe_append Cycle.coe_cons_eq_coe_append
/-- The unique empty cycle. -/
def nil : Cycle α :=
([] : List α)
#align cycle.nil Cycle.nil
@[simp]
theorem coe_nil : ↑([] : List α) = @nil α :=
rfl
#align cycle.coe_nil Cycle.coe_nil
@[simp]
theorem coe_eq_nil (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α) = nil ↔ l = [] :=
coe_eq_coe.trans isRotated_nil_iff
#align cycle.coe_eq_nil Cycle.coe_eq_nil
/-- For consistency with `EmptyCollection (List α)`. -/
instance : EmptyCollection (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_eq : ∅ = @nil α :=
rfl
#align cycle.empty_eq Cycle.empty_eq
instance : Inhabited (Cycle α) :=
⟨nil⟩
/-- An induction principle for `Cycle`. Use as `induction s using Cycle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on {C : Cycle α → Prop} (s : Cycle α) (H0 : C nil)
(HI : ∀ (a) (l : List α), C ↑l → C ↑(a :: l)) : C s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
refine List.recOn l ?_ ?_ <;> simp
assumption'
#align cycle.induction_on Cycle.induction_on
/-- For `x : α`, `s : Cycle α`, `x ∈ s` indicates that `x` occurs at least once in `s`. -/
def Mem (a : α) (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s (fun l => a ∈ l) fun _ _ e => propext <| e.mem_iff
#align cycle.mem Cycle.Mem
instance : Membership α (Cycle α) :=
⟨Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_coe_iff {a : α} {l : List α} : a ∈ (↑l : Cycle α) ↔ a ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
#align cycle.mem_coe_iff Cycle.mem_coe_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_nil : ∀ a, a ∉ @nil α :=
List.not_mem_nil
#align cycle.not_mem_nil Cycle.not_mem_nil
instance [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Cycle α) := fun s₁ s₂ =>
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton₂' s₁ s₂ fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff' _ Quotient.eq''
instance [DecidableEq α] (x : α) (s : Cycle α) : Decidable (x ∈ s) :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton' s fun l => show Decidable (x ∈ l) from inferInstance
/-- Reverse a `s : Cycle α` by reversing the underlying `List`. -/
nonrec def reverse (s : Cycle α) : Cycle α :=
Quot.map reverse (fun _ _ => IsRotated.reverse) s
#align cycle.reverse Cycle.reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_coe (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).reverse = l.reverse :=
rfl
#align cycle.reverse_coe Cycle.reverse_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_reverse_iff {a : α} {s : Cycle α} : a ∈ s.reverse ↔ a ∈ s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => mem_reverse
#align cycle.mem_reverse_iff Cycle.mem_reverse_iff
@[simp]
theorem reverse_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.reverse = s :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => by simp
#align cycle.reverse_reverse Cycle.reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_nil : nil.reverse = @nil α :=
rfl
#align cycle.reverse_nil Cycle.reverse_nil
/-- The length of the `s : Cycle α`, which is the number of elements, counting duplicates. -/
def length (s : Cycle α) : ℕ :=
Quot.liftOn s List.length fun _ _ e => e.perm.length_eq
#align cycle.length Cycle.length
@[simp]
theorem length_coe (l : List α) : length (l : Cycle α) = l.length :=
rfl
#align cycle.length_coe Cycle.length_coe
@[simp]
theorem length_nil : length (@nil α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align cycle.length_nil Cycle.length_nil
@[simp]
theorem length_reverse (s : Cycle α) : s.reverse.length = s.length :=
Quot.inductionOn s List.length_reverse
#align cycle.length_reverse Cycle.length_reverse
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is at most one element. -/
def Subsingleton (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
s.length ≤ 1
#align cycle.subsingleton Cycle.Subsingleton
theorem subsingleton_nil : Subsingleton (@nil α) := Nat.zero_le _
#align cycle.subsingleton_nil Cycle.subsingleton_nil
theorem length_subsingleton_iff {s : Cycle α} : Subsingleton s ↔ length s ≤ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align cycle.length_subsingleton_iff Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem subsingleton_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
simp [length_subsingleton_iff]
#align cycle.subsingleton_reverse_iff Cycle.subsingleton_reverse_iff
theorem Subsingleton.congr {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) :
∀ ⦃x⦄ (_hx : x ∈ s) ⦃y⦄ (_hy : y ∈ s), x = y := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe, le_iff_lt_or_eq, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
length_eq_zero, length_eq_one, Nat.not_lt_zero, false_or_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | ⟨z, rfl⟩) <;> simp
#align cycle.subsingleton.congr Cycle.Subsingleton.congr
/-- A `s : Cycle α` that is made up of at least two unique elements. -/
def Nontrivial (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ s
#align cycle.nontrivial Cycle.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
Nontrivial (l : Cycle α) ↔ 2 ≤ l.length := by
rw [Nontrivial]
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp
· simp
· simp only [mem_cons, exists_prop, mem_coe_iff, List.length, Ne, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff,
Nat.zero_le, iff_true_iff]
refine ⟨hd, hd', ?_, by simp⟩
simp only [not_or, mem_cons, nodup_cons] at hl
exact hl.left.left
#align cycle.nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff Cycle.nontrivial_coe_nodup_iff
@[simp]
theorem nontrivial_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp [Nontrivial]
#align cycle.nontrivial_reverse_iff Cycle.nontrivial_reverse_iff
theorem length_nontrivial {s : Cycle α} (h : Nontrivial s) : 2 ≤ length s := by
obtain ⟨x, y, hxy, hx, hy⟩ := h
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
rcases l with (_ | ⟨hd, _ | ⟨hd', tl⟩⟩)
· simp at hx
· simp only [mem_coe_iff, mk_eq_coe, mem_singleton] at hx hy
simp [hx, hy] at hxy
· simp [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff]
#align cycle.length_nontrivial Cycle.length_nontrivial
/-- The `s : Cycle α` contains no duplicates. -/
nonrec def Nodup (s : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quot.liftOn s Nodup fun _l₁ _l₂ e => propext <| e.nodup_iff
#align cycle.nodup Cycle.Nodup
@[simp]
nonrec theorem nodup_nil : Nodup (@nil α) :=
nodup_nil
#align cycle.nodup_nil Cycle.nodup_nil
@[simp]
theorem nodup_coe_iff {l : List α} : Nodup (l : Cycle α) ↔ l.Nodup :=
Iff.rfl
#align cycle.nodup_coe_iff Cycle.nodup_coe_iff
@[simp]
theorem nodup_reverse_iff {s : Cycle α} : s.reverse.Nodup ↔ s.Nodup :=
Quot.inductionOn s fun _ => nodup_reverse
#align cycle.nodup_reverse_iff Cycle.nodup_reverse_iff
theorem Subsingleton.nodup {s : Cycle α} (h : Subsingleton s) : Nodup s := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with l
cases' l with hd tl
· simp
· have : tl = [] := by simpa [Subsingleton, length_eq_zero, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using h
simp [this]
#align cycle.subsingleton.nodup Cycle.Subsingleton.nodup
theorem Nodup.nontrivial_iff {s : Cycle α} (h : Nodup s) : Nontrivial s ↔ ¬Subsingleton s := by
rw [length_subsingleton_iff]
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn'
simp only [mk''_eq_coe, nodup_coe_iff] at h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_iff]
#align cycle.nodup.nontrivial_iff Cycle.Nodup.nontrivial_iff
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Multiset α`.
-/
def toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset α :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (↑) fun _ _ h => Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr h.perm
#align cycle.to_multiset Cycle.toMultiset
@[simp]
theorem coe_toMultiset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toMultiset = l :=
rfl
#align cycle.coe_to_multiset Cycle.coe_toMultiset
@[simp]
theorem nil_toMultiset : nil.toMultiset = (0 : Multiset α) :=
rfl
#align cycle.nil_to_multiset Cycle.nil_toMultiset
@[simp]
theorem card_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : Multiset.card s.toMultiset = s.length :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
#align cycle.card_to_multiset Cycle.card_toMultiset
@[simp]
theorem toMultiset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toMultiset = 0 ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
#align cycle.to_multiset_eq_nil Cycle.toMultiset_eq_nil
/-- The lift of `list.map`. -/
def map {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : Cycle α → Cycle β :=
Quotient.map' (List.map f) fun _ _ h => h.map _
#align cycle.map Cycle.map
@[simp]
theorem map_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) : map f nil = nil :=
rfl
#align cycle.map_nil Cycle.map_nil
@[simp]
theorem map_coe {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (l : List α) : map f ↑l = List.map f l :=
rfl
#align cycle.map_coe Cycle.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_nil {β : Type*} (f : α → β) (s : Cycle α) : map f s = nil ↔ s = nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
#align cycle.map_eq_nil Cycle.map_eq_nil
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {β : Type*} {f : α → β} {b : β} {s : Cycle α} :
b ∈ s.map f ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
#align cycle.mem_map Cycle.mem_map
/-- The `Multiset` of lists that can make the cycle. -/
def lists (s : Cycle α) : Multiset (List α) :=
Quotient.liftOn' s (fun l => (l.cyclicPermutations : Multiset (List α))) fun l₁ l₂ h => by
simpa using h.cyclicPermutations.perm
#align cycle.lists Cycle.lists
@[simp]
theorem lists_coe (l : List α) : lists (l : Cycle α) = ↑l.cyclicPermutations :=
rfl
#align cycle.lists_coe Cycle.lists_coe
@[simp]
theorem mem_lists_iff_coe_eq {s : Cycle α} {l : List α} : l ∈ s.lists ↔ (l : Cycle α) = s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
rw [lists, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'']
simp
#align cycle.mem_lists_iff_coe_eq Cycle.mem_lists_iff_coe_eq
@[simp]
theorem lists_nil : lists (@nil α) = [([] : List α)] := by
rw [nil, lists_coe, cyclicPermutations_nil]
#align cycle.lists_nil Cycle.lists_nil
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α]
/-- Auxiliary decidability algorithm for lists that contain at least two unique elements.
-/
def decidableNontrivialCoe : ∀ l : List α, Decidable (Nontrivial (l : Cycle α))
| [] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| [x] => isFalse (by simp [Nontrivial])
| x :: y :: l =>
if h : x = y then
@decidable_of_iff' _ (Nontrivial (x :: l : Cycle α)) (by simp [h, Nontrivial])
(decidableNontrivialCoe (x :: l))
else isTrue ⟨x, y, h, by simp, by simp⟩
#align cycle.decidable_nontrivial_coe Cycle.decidableNontrivialCoe
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nontrivial s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s decidableNontrivialCoe
instance {s : Cycle α} : Decidable (Nodup s) :=
Quot.recOnSubsingleton' s List.nodupDecidable
instance fintypeNodupCycle [Fintype α] : Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup } :=
Fintype.ofSurjective (fun l : { l : List α // l.Nodup } => ⟨l.val, by simpa using l.prop⟩)
fun ⟨s, hs⟩ => by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn' with s hs
exact ⟨⟨s, hs⟩, by simp⟩
#align cycle.fintype_nodup_cycle Cycle.fintypeNodupCycle
instance fintypeNodupNontrivialCycle [Fintype α] :
Fintype { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup ∧ s.Nontrivial } :=
Fintype.subtype
(((Finset.univ : Finset { s : Cycle α // s.Nodup }).map (Function.Embedding.subtype _)).filter
Cycle.Nontrivial)
(by simp)
#align cycle.fintype_nodup_nontrivial_cycle Cycle.fintypeNodupNontrivialCycle
/-- The `s : Cycle α` as a `Finset α`. -/
def toFinset (s : Cycle α) : Finset α :=
s.toMultiset.toFinset
#align cycle.to_finset Cycle.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_toMultiset (s : Cycle α) : s.toMultiset.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
rfl
#align cycle.to_finset_to_multiset Cycle.toFinset_toMultiset
@[simp]
theorem coe_toFinset (l : List α) : (l : Cycle α).toFinset = l.toFinset :=
rfl
#align cycle.coe_to_finset Cycle.coe_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem nil_toFinset : (@nil α).toFinset = ∅ :=
rfl
#align cycle.nil_to_finset Cycle.nil_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_eq_nil {s : Cycle α} : s.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = Cycle.nil :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s (by simp)
#align cycle.to_finset_eq_nil Cycle.toFinset_eq_nil
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the next element after `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def next : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => next l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
Function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _he =>
Function.hfunext rfl fun x y hxy =>
Function.hfunext (propext (by rw [eq_of_heq hxy]; simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
fun hm hm' he' => heq_of_eq
(by rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst x; simpa using isRotated_next_eq h h₁ _)
#align cycle.next Cycle.next
/-- Given a `s : Cycle α` such that `Nodup s`, retrieve the previous element before `x ∈ s`. -/
nonrec def prev : ∀ (s : Cycle α) (_hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α := fun s =>
Quot.hrecOn (motive := fun (s : Cycle α) => ∀ (_hs : Cycle.Nodup s) (x : α) (_hx : x ∈ s), α) s
(fun l _hn x hx => prev l x hx) fun l₁ l₂ h =>
Function.hfunext (propext h.nodup_iff) fun h₁ h₂ _he =>
Function.hfunext rfl fun x y hxy =>
Function.hfunext (propext (by rw [eq_of_heq hxy]; simpa [eq_of_heq hxy] using h.mem_iff))
fun hm hm' he' => heq_of_eq
(by rw [heq_iff_eq] at hxy; subst x; simpa using isRotated_prev_eq h h₁ _)
#align cycle.prev Cycle.prev
-- Porting note: removed `simp` and added `prev_reverse_eq_next'` with `simp` attribute
nonrec theorem prev_reverse_eq_next (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.reverse.prev (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.next hs x hx :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s prev_reverse_eq_next
#align cycle.prev_reverse_eq_next Cycle.prev_reverse_eq_next
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
nonrec theorem prev_reverse_eq_next' (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s.reverse) (x : α)
(hx : x ∈ s.reverse) :
s.reverse.prev hs x hx = s.next (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx) :=
prev_reverse_eq_next s (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx)
-- Porting note: removed `simp` and added `next_reverse_eq_prev'` with `simp` attribute
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
s.reverse.next (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mpr hx) = s.prev hs x hx := by
simp [← prev_reverse_eq_next]
#align cycle.next_reverse_eq_prev Cycle.next_reverse_eq_prev
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem next_reverse_eq_prev' (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s.reverse) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s.reverse) :
s.reverse.next hs x hx = s.prev (nodup_reverse_iff.mp hs) x (mem_reverse_iff.mp hx) := by
simp [← prev_reverse_eq_next]
@[simp]
nonrec theorem next_mem (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.next hs x hx ∈ s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
apply next_mem; assumption
#align cycle.next_mem Cycle.next_mem
theorem prev_mem (s : Cycle α) (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.prev hs x hx ∈ s := by
rw [← next_reverse_eq_prev, ← mem_reverse_iff]
apply next_mem
#align cycle.prev_mem Cycle.prev_mem
@[simp]
nonrec theorem prev_next (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.prev hs (s.next hs x hx) (next_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s prev_next
#align cycle.prev_next Cycle.prev_next
@[simp]
nonrec theorem next_prev (s : Cycle α) : ∀ (hs : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s),
s.next hs (s.prev hs x hx) (prev_mem s hs x hx) = x :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s next_prev
#align cycle.next_prev Cycle.next_prev
end Decidable
/-- We define a representation of concrete cycles, available when viewing them in a goal state or
via `#eval`, when over representable types. For example, the cycle `(2 1 4 3)` will be shown
as `c[2, 1, 4, 3]`. Two equal cycles may be printed differently if their internal representation
is different.
-/
unsafe instance [Repr α] : Repr (Cycle α) :=
⟨fun s _ => "c[" ++ Std.Format.joinSep (s.map repr).lists.unquot.head! ", " ++ "]"⟩
/-- `chain R s` means that `R` holds between adjacent elements of `s`.
`chain R ([a, b, c] : Cycle α) ↔ R a b ∧ R b c ∧ R c a` -/
nonrec def Chain (r : α → α → Prop) (c : Cycle α) : Prop :=
Quotient.liftOn' c
(fun l =>
match l with
| [] => True
| a :: m => Chain r a (m ++ [a]))
fun a b hab =>
propext <| by
cases' a with a l <;> cases' b with b m
· rfl
· have := isRotated_nil_iff'.1 hab
contradiction
· have := isRotated_nil_iff.1 hab
contradiction
· dsimp only
cases' hab with n hn
induction' n with d hd generalizing a b l m
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, rotate_zero, cons.injEq] at hn
rw [hn.1, hn.2]
· cases' l with c s
· simp only [rotate_cons_succ, nil_append, rotate_singleton, cons.injEq] at hn
rw [hn.1, hn.2]
· rw [Nat.add_comm, ← rotate_rotate, rotate_cons_succ, rotate_zero, cons_append] at hn
rw [← hd c _ _ _ hn]
simp [and_comm]
#align cycle.chain Cycle.Chain
@[simp]
theorem Chain.nil (r : α → α → Prop) : Cycle.Chain r (@nil α) := by trivial
#align cycle.chain.nil Cycle.Chain.nil
@[simp]
theorem chain_coe_cons (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
Chain r (a :: l) ↔ List.Chain r a (l ++ [a]) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cycle.chain_coe_cons Cycle.chain_coe_cons
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem chain_singleton (r : α → α → Prop) (a : α) : Chain r [a] ↔ r a a := by
rw [chain_coe_cons, nil_append, List.chain_singleton]
#align cycle.chain_singleton Cycle.chain_singleton
theorem chain_ne_nil (r : α → α → Prop) {l : List α} :
∀ hl : l ≠ [], Chain r l ↔ List.Chain r (getLast l hl) l :=
l.reverseRecOn (fun hm => hm.irrefl.elim) (by
intro m a _H _
rw [← coe_cons_eq_coe_append, chain_coe_cons, getLast_append_singleton])
#align cycle.chain_ne_nil Cycle.chain_ne_nil
theorem chain_map {β : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} (f : β → α) {s : Cycle β} :
Chain r (s.map f) ↔ Chain (fun a b => r (f a) (f b)) s :=
Quotient.inductionOn' s fun l => by
cases' l with a l
· rfl
dsimp only [Chain, ← mk''_eq_coe, Quotient.liftOn'_mk'', Cycle.map, Quotient.map', Quot.map,
Quotient.mk'', Quotient.liftOn', Quotient.liftOn, Quot.liftOn_mk, List.map]
rw [← concat_eq_append, ← List.map_concat, List.chain_map f]
simp
#align cycle.chain_map Cycle.chain_map
nonrec theorem chain_range_succ (r : ℕ → ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) :
Chain r (List.range n.succ) ↔ r n 0 ∧ ∀ m < n, r m m.succ := by
rw [range_succ, ← coe_cons_eq_coe_append, chain_coe_cons, ← range_succ, chain_range_succ]
#align cycle.chain_range_succ Cycle.chain_range_succ
variable {r : α → α → Prop} {s : Cycle α}
theorem Chain.imp {r₁ r₂ : α → α → Prop} (H : ∀ a b, r₁ a b → r₂ a b) (p : Chain r₁ s) :
Chain r₂ s := by
induction s using Cycle.induction_on
· trivial
· rw [chain_coe_cons] at p ⊢
exact p.imp H
#align cycle.chain.imp Cycle.Chain.imp
/-- As a function from a relation to a predicate, `chain` is monotonic. -/
theorem chain_mono : Monotone (Chain : (α → α → Prop) → Cycle α → Prop) := fun _a _b hab _s =>
Chain.imp hab
#align cycle.chain_mono Cycle.chain_mono
| Mathlib/Data/List/Cycle.lean | 982 | 1,004 | theorem chain_of_pairwise : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) → Chain r s := by |
induction' s using Cycle.induction_on with a l _
· exact fun _ => Cycle.Chain.nil r
intro hs
have Ha : a ∈ (a :: l : Cycle α) := by simp
have Hl : ∀ {b} (_hb : b ∈ l), b ∈ (a :: l : Cycle α) := @fun b hb => by simp [hb]
rw [Cycle.chain_coe_cons]
apply Pairwise.chain
rw [pairwise_cons]
refine
⟨fun b hb => ?_,
pairwise_append.2
⟨pairwise_of_forall_mem_list fun b hb c hc => hs b (Hl hb) c (Hl hc),
pairwise_singleton r a, fun b hb c hc => ?_⟩⟩
· rw [mem_append] at hb
cases' hb with hb hb
· exact hs a Ha b (Hl hb)
· rw [mem_singleton] at hb
rw [hb]
exact hs a Ha a Ha
· rw [mem_singleton] at hc
rw [hc]
exact hs b (Hl hb) a Ha
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Order
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.ENNReal
#align_import topology.algebra.infinite_sum.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9a59dcb7a2d06bf55da57b9030169219980660cd"
/-!
# Infinite sum in the reals
This file provides lemmas about Cauchy sequences in terms of infinite sums and infinite sums valued
in the reals.
-/
open Filter Finset NNReal Topology
variable {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {f : ℕ → α} {a : α}
/-- If the distance between consecutive points of a sequence is estimated by a summable series,
then the original sequence is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) : CauchySeq f := by
lift d to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using fun n ↦ dist_nonneg.trans (hf n)
apply cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_summable d (α := α) (f := f)
· exact_mod_cast hf
· exact_mod_cast hd
#align cauchy_seq_of_dist_le_of_summable cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable
theorem cauchySeq_of_summable_dist (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) : CauchySeq f :=
cauchySeq_of_dist_le_of_summable _ (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h
#align cauchy_seq_of_summable_dist cauchySeq_of_summable_dist
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, d (n + m) := by
refine le_of_tendsto (tendsto_const_nhds.dist ha) (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨n, fun m hnm ↦ ?_⟩)
refine le_trans (dist_le_Ico_sum_of_dist_le hnm fun _ _ ↦ hf _) ?_
rw [sum_Ico_eq_sum_range]
refine sum_le_tsum (range _) (fun _ _ ↦ le_trans dist_nonneg (hf _)) ?_
exact hd.comp_injective (add_right_injective n)
#align dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto
theorem dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ (d : ℕ → ℝ) (hf : ∀ n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) ≤ d n)
(hd : Summable d) (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ tsum d := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto d hf hd ha 0
#align dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀ dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto₀
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n) : dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, dist (f (n + m)) (f (n + m).succ) :=
show dist (f n) a ≤ ∑' m, (fun x ↦ dist (f x) (f x.succ)) (n + m) from
dist_le_tsum_of_dist_le_of_tendsto (fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ)) (fun _ ↦ le_rfl) h ha n
#align dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto
theorem dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ (h : Summable fun n ↦ dist (f n) (f n.succ))
(ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) : dist (f 0) a ≤ ∑' n, dist (f n) (f n.succ) := by
simpa only [zero_add] using dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto h ha 0
#align dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀ dist_le_tsum_dist_of_tendsto₀
section summable
theorem not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
¬Summable f ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by
lift f to ℕ → ℝ≥0 using hf
exact mod_cast NNReal.not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop
#align not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_at_top_of_nonneg not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Real.lean | 73 | 75 | theorem summable_iff_not_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg {f : ℕ → ℝ} (hf : ∀ n, 0 ≤ f n) :
Summable f ↔ ¬Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∑ i ∈ Finset.range n, f i) atTop atTop := by |
rw [← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not, not_summable_iff_tendsto_nat_atTop_of_nonneg hf]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Robert Y. Lewis, Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.OrderDual
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
/-!
# Lemmas about the interaction of power operations with order in terms of `CovariantClass`
-/
open Function
variable {β G M : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M]
section Preorder
variable [Preorder M]
section Left
variable [CovariantClass M M (· * ·) (· ≤ ·)] {x : M}
@[to_additive (attr := mono, gcongr) nsmul_le_nsmul_right]
theorem pow_le_pow_left' [CovariantClass M M (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·)] {a b : M} (hab : a ≤ b) :
∀ i : ℕ, a ^ i ≤ b ^ i
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ]
exact mul_le_mul' (pow_le_pow_left' hab k) hab
#align pow_le_pow_of_le_left' pow_le_pow_left'
#align nsmul_le_nsmul_of_le_right nsmul_le_nsmul_right
@[to_additive nsmul_nonneg]
theorem one_le_pow_of_one_le' {a : M} (H : 1 ≤ a) : ∀ n : ℕ, 1 ≤ a ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ]
exact one_le_mul (one_le_pow_of_one_le' H k) H
#align one_le_pow_of_one_le' one_le_pow_of_one_le'
#align nsmul_nonneg nsmul_nonneg
@[to_additive nsmul_nonpos]
theorem pow_le_one' {a : M} (H : a ≤ 1) (n : ℕ) : a ^ n ≤ 1 :=
@one_le_pow_of_one_le' Mᵒᵈ _ _ _ _ H n
#align pow_le_one' pow_le_one'
#align nsmul_nonpos nsmul_nonpos
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr) nsmul_le_nsmul_left]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Monoid/Unbundled/Pow.lean | 56 | 60 | theorem pow_le_pow_right' {a : M} {n m : ℕ} (ha : 1 ≤ a) (h : n ≤ m) : a ^ n ≤ a ^ m :=
let ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.le.dest h
calc
a ^ n ≤ a ^ n * a ^ k := le_mul_of_one_le_right' (one_le_pow_of_one_le' ha _)
_ = a ^ m := by | rw [← hk, pow_add]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Tower
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Basic
#align_import field_theory.intermediate_field from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c596622fccd6e0321979d94931c964054dea2d26"
/-!
# Intermediate fields
Let `L / K` be a field extension, given as an instance `Algebra K L`.
This file defines the type of fields in between `K` and `L`, `IntermediateField K L`.
An `IntermediateField K L` is a subfield of `L` which contains (the image of) `K`,
i.e. it is a `Subfield L` and a `Subalgebra K L`.
## Main definitions
* `IntermediateField K L` : the type of intermediate fields between `K` and `L`.
* `Subalgebra.to_intermediateField`: turns a subalgebra closed under `⁻¹`
into an intermediate field
* `Subfield.to_intermediateField`: turns a subfield containing the image of `K`
into an intermediate field
* `IntermediateField.map`: map an intermediate field along an `AlgHom`
* `IntermediateField.restrict_scalars`: restrict the scalars of an intermediate field to a smaller
field in a tower of fields.
## Implementation notes
Intermediate fields are defined with a structure extending `Subfield` and `Subalgebra`.
A `Subalgebra` is closed under all operations except `⁻¹`,
## Tags
intermediate field, field extension
-/
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable (K L L' : Type*) [Field K] [Field L] [Field L'] [Algebra K L] [Algebra K L']
/-- `S : IntermediateField K L` is a subset of `L` such that there is a field
tower `L / S / K`. -/
structure IntermediateField extends Subalgebra K L where
inv_mem' : ∀ x ∈ carrier, x⁻¹ ∈ carrier
#align intermediate_field IntermediateField
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subalgebra`. -/
add_decl_doc IntermediateField.toSubalgebra
variable {K L L'}
variable (S : IntermediateField K L)
namespace IntermediateField
instance : SetLike (IntermediateField K L) L :=
⟨fun S => S.toSubalgebra.carrier, by
rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨⟨⟩⟩
simp ⟩
protected theorem neg_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) : -x ∈ S := by
show -x ∈S.toSubalgebra; simpa
#align intermediate_field.neg_mem IntermediateField.neg_mem
/-- Reinterpret an `IntermediateField` as a `Subfield`. -/
def toSubfield : Subfield L :=
{ S.toSubalgebra with
neg_mem' := S.neg_mem,
inv_mem' := S.inv_mem' }
#align intermediate_field.to_subfield IntermediateField.toSubfield
instance : SubfieldClass (IntermediateField K L) L where
add_mem {s} := s.add_mem'
zero_mem {s} := s.zero_mem'
neg_mem {s} := s.neg_mem
mul_mem {s} := s.mul_mem'
one_mem {s} := s.one_mem'
inv_mem {s} := s.inv_mem' _
--@[simp] Porting note (#10618): simp can prove it
theorem mem_carrier {s : IntermediateField K L} {x : L} : x ∈ s.carrier ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_carrier IntermediateField.mem_carrier
/-- Two intermediate fields are equal if they have the same elements. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext {S T : IntermediateField K L} (h : ∀ x, x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ T) : S = T :=
SetLike.ext h
#align intermediate_field.ext IntermediateField.ext
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubalgebra : (S.toSubalgebra : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.coe_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem coe_toSubfield : (S.toSubfield : Set L) = S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_to_subfield IntermediateField.coe_toSubfield
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk (s : Subsemiring L) (hK : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ s) (hi) (x : L) :
x ∈ IntermediateField.mk (Subalgebra.mk s hK) hi ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_mk IntermediateField.mem_mkₓ
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubalgebra (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubalgebra ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subalgebra IntermediateField.mem_toSubalgebra
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSubfield (s : IntermediateField K L) (x : L) : x ∈ s.toSubfield ↔ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align intermediate_field.mem_to_subfield IntermediateField.mem_toSubfield
/-- Copy of an intermediate field with a new `carrier` equal to the old one. Useful to fix
definitional equalities. -/
protected def copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
IntermediateField K L where
toSubalgebra := S.toSubalgebra.copy s (hs : s = S.toSubalgebra.carrier)
inv_mem' :=
have hs' : (S.toSubalgebra.copy s hs).carrier = S.toSubalgebra.carrier := hs
hs'.symm ▸ S.inv_mem'
#align intermediate_field.copy IntermediateField.copy
@[simp]
theorem coe_copy (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) :
(S.copy s hs : Set L) = s :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_copy IntermediateField.coe_copy
theorem copy_eq (S : IntermediateField K L) (s : Set L) (hs : s = ↑S) : S.copy s hs = S :=
SetLike.coe_injective hs
#align intermediate_field.copy_eq IntermediateField.copy_eq
section InheritedLemmas
/-! ### Lemmas inherited from more general structures
The declarations in this section derive from the fact that an `IntermediateField` is also a
subalgebra or subfield. Their use should be replaceable with the corresponding lemma from a
subobject class.
-/
/-- An intermediate field contains the image of the smaller field. -/
theorem algebraMap_mem (x : K) : algebraMap K L x ∈ S :=
S.algebraMap_mem' x
#align intermediate_field.algebra_map_mem IntermediateField.algebraMap_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under scalar multiplication. -/
theorem smul_mem {y : L} : y ∈ S → ∀ {x : K}, x • y ∈ S :=
S.toSubalgebra.smul_mem
#align intermediate_field.smul_mem IntermediateField.smul_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 1. -/
protected theorem one_mem : (1 : L) ∈ S :=
one_mem S
#align intermediate_field.one_mem IntermediateField.one_mem
/-- An intermediate field contains the ring's 0. -/
protected theorem zero_mem : (0 : L) ∈ S :=
zero_mem S
#align intermediate_field.zero_mem IntermediateField.zero_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under multiplication. -/
protected theorem mul_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x * y ∈ S :=
mul_mem
#align intermediate_field.mul_mem IntermediateField.mul_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under addition. -/
protected theorem add_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x + y ∈ S :=
add_mem
#align intermediate_field.add_mem IntermediateField.add_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under subtraction -/
protected theorem sub_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x - y ∈ S :=
sub_mem
#align intermediate_field.sub_mem IntermediateField.sub_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under inverses. -/
protected theorem inv_mem {x : L} : x ∈ S → x⁻¹ ∈ S :=
inv_mem
#align intermediate_field.inv_mem IntermediateField.inv_mem
/-- An intermediate field is closed under division. -/
protected theorem div_mem {x y : L} : x ∈ S → y ∈ S → x / y ∈ S :=
div_mem
#align intermediate_field.div_mem IntermediateField.div_mem
/-- Product of a list of elements in an intermediate_field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_prod_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.prod ∈ S :=
list_prod_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_prod_mem IntermediateField.list_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a list of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem list_sum_mem {l : List L} : (∀ x ∈ l, x ∈ S) → l.sum ∈ S :=
list_sum_mem
#align intermediate_field.list_sum_mem IntermediateField.list_sum_mem
/-- Product of a multiset of elements in an intermediate field is in the intermediate_field. -/
protected theorem multiset_prod_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.prod ∈ S :=
multiset_prod_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_prod_mem IntermediateField.multiset_prod_mem
/-- Sum of a multiset of elements in an `IntermediateField` is in the `IntermediateField`. -/
protected theorem multiset_sum_mem (m : Multiset L) : (∀ a ∈ m, a ∈ S) → m.sum ∈ S :=
multiset_sum_mem m
#align intermediate_field.multiset_sum_mem IntermediateField.multiset_sum_mem
/-- Product of elements of an intermediate field indexed by a `Finset` is in the intermediate_field.
-/
protected theorem prod_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∏ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
prod_mem h
#align intermediate_field.prod_mem IntermediateField.prod_mem
/-- Sum of elements in an `IntermediateField` indexed by a `Finset` is in the `IntermediateField`.
-/
protected theorem sum_mem {ι : Type*} {t : Finset ι} {f : ι → L} (h : ∀ c ∈ t, f c ∈ S) :
(∑ i ∈ t, f i) ∈ S :=
sum_mem h
#align intermediate_field.sum_mem IntermediateField.sum_mem
protected theorem pow_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : x ^ n ∈ S :=
zpow_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.pow_mem IntermediateField.pow_mem
protected theorem zsmul_mem {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) (n : ℤ) : n • x ∈ S :=
zsmul_mem hx n
#align intermediate_field.zsmul_mem IntermediateField.zsmul_mem
protected theorem intCast_mem (n : ℤ) : (n : L) ∈ S :=
intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_int_mem IntermediateField.intCast_mem
protected theorem coe_add (x y : S) : (↑(x + y) : L) = ↑x + ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_add IntermediateField.coe_add
protected theorem coe_neg (x : S) : (↑(-x) : L) = -↑x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_neg IntermediateField.coe_neg
protected theorem coe_mul (x y : S) : (↑(x * y) : L) = ↑x * ↑y :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_mul IntermediateField.coe_mul
protected theorem coe_inv (x : S) : (↑x⁻¹ : L) = (↑x)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_inv IntermediateField.coe_inv
protected theorem coe_zero : ((0 : S) : L) = 0 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_zero IntermediateField.coe_zero
protected theorem coe_one : ((1 : S) : L) = 1 :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_one IntermediateField.coe_one
protected theorem coe_pow (x : S) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n : S) : L) = (x : L) ^ n :=
SubmonoidClass.coe_pow x n
#align intermediate_field.coe_pow IntermediateField.coe_pow
end InheritedLemmas
theorem natCast_mem (n : ℕ) : (n : L) ∈ S := by simpa using intCast_mem S n
#align intermediate_field.coe_nat_mem IntermediateField.natCast_mem
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated _root_.natCast_mem] alias coe_nat_mem := natCast_mem
@[deprecated _root_.intCast_mem] alias coe_int_mem := intCast_mem
end IntermediateField
/-- Turn a subalgebra closed under inverses into an intermediate field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
inv_mem' := inv_mem }
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field Subalgebra.toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField (S : Subalgebra K L) (inv_mem : ∀ x ∈ S, x⁻¹ ∈ S) :
(S.toIntermediateField inv_mem).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
(S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField fun x => S.inv_mem) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subalgebra satisfying `IsField` into an intermediate_field -/
def Subalgebra.toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) : IntermediateField K L :=
S.toIntermediateField fun x hx => by
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, inv_zero]
exact S.zero_mem
letI hS' := hS.toField
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hS.mul_inv_cancel (show (⟨x, hx⟩ : S) ≠ 0 from Subtype.coe_ne_coe.1 hx0)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, S.coe_mul, S.coe_one, Subtype.coe_mk, mul_eq_one_iff_inv_eq₀ hx0] at hy
exact hy.symm ▸ y.2
#align subalgebra.to_intermediate_field' Subalgebra.toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField' (S : Subalgebra K L) (hS : IsField S) :
(S.toIntermediateField' hS).toSubalgebra = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_subalgebra_to_intermediate_field' toSubalgebra_toIntermediateField'
@[simp]
theorem toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra (S : IntermediateField K L) :
S.toSubalgebra.toIntermediateField' (Field.toIsField S) = S := by
ext
rfl
#align to_intermediate_field'_to_subalgebra toIntermediateField'_toSubalgebra
/-- Turn a subfield of `L` containing the image of `K` into an intermediate field -/
def Subfield.toIntermediateField (S : Subfield L) (algebra_map_mem : ∀ x, algebraMap K L x ∈ S) :
IntermediateField K L :=
{ S with
algebraMap_mem' := algebra_map_mem }
#align subfield.to_intermediate_field Subfield.toIntermediateField
namespace IntermediateField
/-- An intermediate field inherits a field structure -/
instance toField : Field S :=
S.toSubfield.toField
#align intermediate_field.to_field IntermediateField.toField
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sum {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∑ i, f i) : L) = ∑ i, (f i : L) := by
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.sum_insert hi, AddMemClass.coe_add, H, Finset.sum_insert hi]
#align intermediate_field.coe_sum IntermediateField.coe_sum
@[norm_cast] --Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem coe_prod {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → S) : (↑(∏ i, f i) : L) = ∏ i, (f i : L) := by
classical
induction' (Finset.univ : Finset ι) using Finset.induction_on with i s hi H
· simp
· rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, MulMemClass.coe_mul, H, Finset.prod_insert hi]
#align intermediate_field.coe_prod IntermediateField.coe_prod
/-! `IntermediateField`s inherit structure from their `Subalgebra` coercions. -/
instance module' {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] : Module R S :=
S.toSubalgebra.module'
#align intermediate_field.module' IntermediateField.module'
instance module : Module K S :=
inferInstanceAs (Module K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.module IntermediateField.module
instance isScalarTower {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] :
IsScalarTower R K S :=
inferInstanceAs (IsScalarTower R K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower IntermediateField.isScalarTower
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul {R} [Semiring R] [SMul R K] [Module R L] [IsScalarTower R K L] (r : R) (x : S) :
↑(r • x : S) = (r • (x : L)) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_smul IntermediateField.coe_smul
#noalign intermediate_field.algebra'
instance algebra : Algebra K S :=
inferInstanceAs (Algebra K S.toSubsemiring)
#align intermediate_field.algebra IntermediateField.algebra
#noalign intermediate_field.to_algebra
@[simp] lemma algebraMap_apply (x : S) : algebraMap S L x = x := rfl
@[simp] lemma coe_algebraMap_apply (x : K) : ↑(algebraMap K S x) = algebraMap K L x := rfl
instance isScalarTower_bot {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Algebra L R] : IsScalarTower S L R :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra _ _ _ S.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_bot IntermediateField.isScalarTower_bot
instance isScalarTower_mid {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Algebra L R] [Algebra K R]
[IsScalarTower K L R] : IsScalarTower K S R :=
IsScalarTower.subalgebra' _ _ _ S.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_mid IntermediateField.isScalarTower_mid
/-- Specialize `is_scalar_tower_mid` to the common case where the top field is `L` -/
instance isScalarTower_mid' : IsScalarTower K S L :=
S.isScalarTower_mid
#align intermediate_field.is_scalar_tower_mid' IntermediateField.isScalarTower_mid'
section shortcut_instances
variable {E} [Field E] [Algebra L E] (T : IntermediateField S E) {S}
instance : Algebra S T := T.algebra
instance : Module S T := Algebra.toModule
instance : SMul S T := Algebra.toSMul
instance [Algebra K E] [IsScalarTower K L E] : IsScalarTower K S T := T.isScalarTower
end shortcut_instances
/-- Given `f : L →ₐ[K] L'`, `S.comap f` is the intermediate field between `K` and `L`
such that `f x ∈ S ↔ x ∈ S.comap f`. -/
def comap (f : L →ₐ[K] L') (S : IntermediateField K L') : IntermediateField K L where
__ := S.toSubalgebra.comap f
inv_mem' x hx := show f x⁻¹ ∈ S by rw [map_inv₀ f x]; exact S.inv_mem hx
/-- Given `f : L →ₐ[K] L'`, `S.map f` is the intermediate field between `K` and `L'`
such that `x ∈ S ↔ f x ∈ S.map f`. -/
def map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') (S : IntermediateField K L) : IntermediateField K L' where
__ := S.toSubalgebra.map f
inv_mem' := by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x⁻¹, S.inv_mem hx, map_inv₀ f x⟩
#align intermediate_field.map IntermediateField.map
@[simp]
theorem coe_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f : Set L') = f '' S :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_map IntermediateField.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem toSubalgebra_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f).toSubalgebra = S.toSubalgebra.map f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toSubfield_map (f : L →ₐ[K] L') : (S.map f).toSubfield = S.toSubfield.map f :=
rfl
theorem map_map {K L₁ L₂ L₃ : Type*} [Field K] [Field L₁] [Algebra K L₁] [Field L₂] [Algebra K L₂]
[Field L₃] [Algebra K L₃] (E : IntermediateField K L₁) (f : L₁ →ₐ[K] L₂) (g : L₂ →ₐ[K] L₃) :
(E.map f).map g = E.map (g.comp f) :=
SetLike.coe_injective <| Set.image_image _ _ _
#align intermediate_field.map_map IntermediateField.map_map
theorem map_mono (f : L →ₐ[K] L') {S T : IntermediateField K L} (h : S ≤ T) :
S.map f ≤ T.map f :=
SetLike.coe_mono (Set.image_subset f h)
theorem map_le_iff_le_comap {f : L →ₐ[K] L'}
{s : IntermediateField K L} {t : IntermediateField K L'} :
s.map f ≤ t ↔ s ≤ t.comap f :=
Set.image_subset_iff
theorem gc_map_comap (f :L →ₐ[K] L') : GaloisConnection (map f) (comap f) :=
fun _ _ ↦ map_le_iff_le_comap
/-- Given an equivalence `e : L ≃ₐ[K] L'` of `K`-field extensions and an intermediate
field `E` of `L/K`, `intermediateFieldMap e E` is the induced equivalence
between `E` and `E.map e` -/
def intermediateFieldMap (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L) : E ≃ₐ[K] E.map e.toAlgHom :=
e.subalgebraMap E.toSubalgebra
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap
/- We manually add these two simp lemmas because `@[simps]` before `intermediate_field_map`
led to a timeout. -/
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem intermediateFieldMap_apply_coe (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L) (a : E) :
↑(intermediateFieldMap e E a) = e a :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map_apply_coe IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap_apply_coe
-- This lemma has always been bad, but the linter only noticed after lean4#2644.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem intermediateFieldMap_symm_apply_coe (e : L ≃ₐ[K] L') (E : IntermediateField K L)
(a : E.map e.toAlgHom) : ↑((intermediateFieldMap e E).symm a) = e.symm a :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.intermediate_field_map_symm_apply_coe IntermediateField.intermediateFieldMap_symm_apply_coe
end IntermediateField
namespace AlgHom
variable (f : L →ₐ[K] L')
/-- The range of an algebra homomorphism, as an intermediate field. -/
@[simps toSubalgebra]
def fieldRange : IntermediateField K L' :=
{ f.range, (f : L →+* L').fieldRange with }
#align alg_hom.field_range AlgHom.fieldRange
@[simp]
theorem coe_fieldRange : ↑f.fieldRange = Set.range f :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.coe_field_range AlgHom.coe_fieldRange
@[simp]
theorem fieldRange_toSubfield : f.fieldRange.toSubfield = (f : L →+* L').fieldRange :=
rfl
#align alg_hom.field_range_to_subfield AlgHom.fieldRange_toSubfield
variable {f}
@[simp]
theorem mem_fieldRange {y : L'} : y ∈ f.fieldRange ↔ ∃ x, f x = y :=
Iff.rfl
#align alg_hom.mem_field_range AlgHom.mem_fieldRange
end AlgHom
namespace IntermediateField
/-- The embedding from an intermediate field of `L / K` to `L`. -/
def val : S →ₐ[K] L :=
S.toSubalgebra.val
#align intermediate_field.val IntermediateField.val
@[simp]
theorem coe_val : ⇑S.val = ((↑) : S → L) :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.coe_val IntermediateField.coe_val
@[simp]
theorem val_mk {x : L} (hx : x ∈ S) : S.val ⟨x, hx⟩ = x :=
rfl
#align intermediate_field.val_mk IntermediateField.val_mk
theorem range_val : S.val.range = S.toSubalgebra :=
S.toSubalgebra.range_val
#align intermediate_field.range_val IntermediateField.range_val
@[simp]
theorem fieldRange_val : S.val.fieldRange = S :=
SetLike.ext' Subtype.range_val
#align intermediate_field.field_range_val IntermediateField.fieldRange_val
instance AlgHom.inhabited : Inhabited (S →ₐ[K] L) :=
⟨S.val⟩
#align intermediate_field.alg_hom.inhabited IntermediateField.AlgHom.inhabited
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/IntermediateField.lean | 545 | 551 | theorem aeval_coe {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [Algebra R K] [Algebra R L] [IsScalarTower R K L]
(x : S) (P : R[X]) : aeval (x : L) P = aeval x P := by |
refine Polynomial.induction_on' P (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n r => ?_
· rw [aeval_add, aeval_add, AddMemClass.coe_add, hf, hg]
· simp only [MulMemClass.coe_mul, aeval_monomial, SubmonoidClass.coe_pow, mul_eq_mul_right_iff]
left
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Funext
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.ULift
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.witt_vector.is_poly from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# The `is_poly` predicate
`WittVector.IsPoly` is a (type-valued) predicate on functions `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R`.
It asserts that there is a family of polynomials `φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ`,
such that the `n`th coefficient of `f x` is equal to `φ n` evaluated on the coefficients of `x`.
Many operations on Witt vectors satisfy this predicate (or an analogue for higher arity functions).
We say that such a function `f` is a *polynomial function*.
The power of satisfying this predicate comes from `WittVector.IsPoly.ext`.
It shows that if `φ` and `ψ` witness that `f` and `g` are polynomial functions,
then `f = g` not merely when `φ = ψ`, but in fact it suffices to prove
```
∀ n, bind₁ φ (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ ψ (wittPolynomial p _ n)
```
(in other words, when evaluating the Witt polynomials on `φ` and `ψ`, we get the same values)
which will then imply `φ = ψ` and hence `f = g`.
Even though this sufficient condition looks somewhat intimidating,
it is rather pleasant to check in practice;
more so than direct checking of `φ = ψ`.
In practice, we apply this technique to show that the composition of `WittVector.frobenius`
and `WittVector.verschiebung` is equal to multiplication by `p`.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.IsPoly`, `WittVector.IsPoly₂`:
two predicates that assert that a unary/binary function on Witt vectors
is polynomial in the coefficients of the input values.
* `WittVector.IsPoly.ext`, `WittVector.IsPoly₂.ext`:
two polynomial functions are equal if their families of polynomials are equal
after evaluating the Witt polynomials on them.
* `WittVector.IsPoly.comp` (+ many variants) show that unary/binary compositions
of polynomial functions are polynomial.
* `WittVector.idIsPoly`, `WittVector.negIsPoly`,
`WittVector.addIsPoly₂`, `WittVector.mulIsPoly₂`:
several well-known operations are polynomial functions
(for Verschiebung, Frobenius, and multiplication by `p`, see their respective files).
## On higher arity analogues
Ideally, there should be a predicate `IsPolyₙ` for functions of higher arity,
together with `IsPolyₙ.comp` that shows how such functions compose.
Since mathlib does not have a library on composition of higher arity functions,
we have only implemented the unary and binary variants so far.
Nullary functions (a.k.a. constants) are treated
as constant functions and fall under the unary case.
## Tactics
There are important metaprograms defined in this file:
the tactics `ghost_simp` and `ghost_calc` and the attribute `@[ghost_simps]`.
These are used in combination to discharge proofs of identities between polynomial functions.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
Any lemma doing "ring equation rewriting" with polynomial functions should be tagged
`@[ghost_simps]`, e.g.
```lean
@[ghost_simps]
lemma bind₁_frobenius_poly_wittPolynomial (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (frobenius_poly p) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = (wittPolynomial p ℤ (n+1))
```
Proofs of identities between polynomial functions will often follow the pattern
```lean
ghost_calc _
<minor preprocessing>
ghost_simp
```
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
namespace WittVector
universe u
variable {p : ℕ} {R S : Type u} {σ idx : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S]
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
open MvPolynomial
open Function (uncurry)
variable (p)
noncomputable section
/-!
### The `IsPoly` predicate
-/
theorem poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq' [Fact p.Prime] (f g : ℕ → MvPolynomial (idx × ℕ) ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ f (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ g (wittPolynomial p _ n)) : f = g := by
ext1 n
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
rw [← Function.funext_iff] at h
replace h :=
congr_arg (fun fam => bind₁ (MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) ∘ fam) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) h
simpa only [Function.comp, map_bind₁, map_wittPolynomial, ← bind₁_bind₁,
bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW, bind₁_X_right] using h
#align witt_vector.poly_eq_of_witt_polynomial_bind_eq' WittVector.poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq'
theorem poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq [Fact p.Prime] (f g : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ)
(h : ∀ n, bind₁ f (wittPolynomial p _ n) = bind₁ g (wittPolynomial p _ n)) : f = g := by
ext1 n
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
rw [← Function.funext_iff] at h
replace h :=
congr_arg (fun fam => bind₁ (MvPolynomial.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) ∘ fam) (xInTermsOfW p ℚ n)) h
simpa only [Function.comp, map_bind₁, map_wittPolynomial, ← bind₁_bind₁,
bind₁_wittPolynomial_xInTermsOfW, bind₁_X_right] using h
#align witt_vector.poly_eq_of_witt_polynomial_bind_eq WittVector.poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq
-- Ideally, we would generalise this to n-ary functions
-- But we don't have a good theory of n-ary compositions in mathlib
/--
A function `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R` that maps Witt vectors to Witt vectors over arbitrary base rings
is said to be *polynomial* if there is a family of polynomials `φₙ` over `ℤ` such that the `n`th
coefficient of `f x` is given by evaluating `φₙ` at the coefficients of `x`.
See also `WittVector.IsPoly₂` for the binary variant.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
-/
class IsPoly (f : ∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R], WittVector p R → 𝕎 R) : Prop where mk' ::
poly :
∃ φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ,
∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R), (f x).coeff = fun n => aeval x.coeff (φ n)
#align witt_vector.is_poly WittVector.IsPoly
/-- The identity function on Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
instance idIsPoly : IsPoly p fun _ _ => id :=
⟨⟨X, by intros; simp only [aeval_X, id]⟩⟩
#align witt_vector.id_is_poly WittVector.idIsPoly
instance idIsPolyI' : IsPoly p fun _ _ a => a :=
WittVector.idIsPoly _
#align witt_vector.id_is_poly_i' WittVector.idIsPolyI'
namespace IsPoly
instance : Inhabited (IsPoly p fun _ _ => id) :=
⟨WittVector.idIsPoly p⟩
variable {p}
theorem ext [Fact p.Prime] {f g} (hf : IsPoly p f) (hg : IsPoly p g)
(h : ∀ (R : Type u) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ),
ghostComponent n (f x) = ghostComponent n (g x)) :
∀ (R : Type u) [_Rcr : CommRing R] (x : 𝕎 R), f x = g x := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
intros
ext n
rw [hf, hg, poly_eq_of_wittPolynomial_bind_eq p φ ψ]
intro k
apply MvPolynomial.funext
intro x
simp only [hom_bind₁]
specialize h (ULift ℤ) (mk p fun i => ⟨x i⟩) k
simp only [ghostComponent_apply, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom] at h
apply (ULift.ringEquiv.symm : ℤ ≃+* _).injective
simp only [← RingEquiv.coe_toRingHom, map_eval₂Hom]
convert h using 1
all_goals
simp only [hf, hg, MvPolynomial.eval, map_eval₂Hom]
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
ext1
apply eval₂Hom_congr (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
simp only [coeff_mk]; rfl
#align witt_vector.is_poly.ext WittVector.IsPoly.ext
/-- The composition of polynomial functions is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (#10754): made this an instance
instance comp {g f} [hg : IsPoly p g] [hf : IsPoly p f] :
IsPoly p fun R _Rcr => @g R _Rcr ∘ @f R _Rcr := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
use fun n => bind₁ φ (ψ n)
intros
simp only [aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hg, hf]
#align witt_vector.is_poly.comp WittVector.IsPoly.comp
end IsPoly
/-- A binary function `f : Π R, 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R` on Witt vectors
is said to be *polynomial* if there is a family of polynomials `φₙ` over `ℤ` such that the `n`th
coefficient of `f x y` is given by evaluating `φₙ` at the coefficients of `x` and `y`.
See also `WittVector.IsPoly` for the unary variant.
The `ghost_calc` tactic makes use of the `IsPoly` and `IsPoly₂` typeclass and its instances.
(In Lean 3, there was an `@[is_poly]` attribute to manage these instances,
because typeclass resolution did not play well with function composition.
This no longer seems to be an issue, so that such instances can be defined directly.)
-/
class IsPoly₂ (f : ∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R], WittVector p R → 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R) : Prop where mk' ::
poly :
∃ φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ,
∀ ⦃R⦄ [CommRing R] (x y : 𝕎 R), (f x y).coeff = fun n => peval (φ n) ![x.coeff, y.coeff]
#align witt_vector.is_poly₂ WittVector.IsPoly₂
variable {p}
/-- The composition of polynomial functions is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (#10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly₂.comp {h f g} [hh : IsPoly₂ p h] [hf : IsPoly p f] [hg : IsPoly p g] :
IsPoly₂ p fun R _Rcr x y => h (f x) (g y) := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
obtain ⟨χ, hh⟩ := hh
refine ⟨⟨fun n ↦ bind₁ (uncurry <|
![fun k ↦ rename (Prod.mk (0 : Fin 2)) (φ k),
fun k ↦ rename (Prod.mk (1 : Fin 2)) (ψ k)]) (χ n), ?_⟩⟩
intros
funext n
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [peval, aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hh, hf, hg,
uncurry]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, n⟩
fin_cases i <;> simp [aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, eval₂Hom_rename, Function.comp]
#align witt_vector.is_poly₂.comp WittVector.IsPoly₂.comp
/-- The composition of a polynomial function with a binary polynomial function is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (#10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly.comp₂ {g f} [hg : IsPoly p g] [hf : IsPoly₂ p f] :
IsPoly₂ p fun R _Rcr x y => g (f x y) := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨ψ, hg⟩ := hg
use fun n => bind₁ φ (ψ n)
intros
simp only [peval, aeval_bind₁, Function.comp, hg, hf]
#align witt_vector.is_poly.comp₂ WittVector.IsPoly.comp₂
/-- The diagonal `fun x ↦ f x x` of a polynomial function `f` is polynomial. -/
-- Porting note (#10754): made this an instance
instance IsPoly₂.diag {f} [hf : IsPoly₂ p f] : IsPoly p fun R _Rcr x => f x x := by
obtain ⟨φ, hf⟩ := hf
refine ⟨⟨fun n => bind₁ (uncurry ![X, X]) (φ n), ?_⟩⟩
intros; funext n
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) only [hf, peval, uncurry, aeval_bind₁]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, k⟩
fin_cases i <;> simp
#align witt_vector.is_poly₂.diag WittVector.IsPoly₂.diag
-- Porting note: Lean 4's typeclass inference is sufficiently more powerful that we no longer
-- need the `@[is_poly]` attribute. Use of the attribute should just be replaced by changing the
-- theorem to an `instance`.
/-- The additive negation is a polynomial function on Witt vectors. -/
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`.
instance negIsPoly [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly p fun R _ => @Neg.neg (𝕎 R) _ :=
⟨⟨fun n => rename Prod.snd (wittNeg p n), by
intros; funext n
rw [neg_coeff, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom, eval₂Hom_rename]
apply eval₂Hom_congr rfl _ rfl
ext ⟨i, k⟩; fin_cases i; rfl⟩⟩
#align witt_vector.neg_is_poly WittVector.negIsPoly
section ZeroOne
/- To avoid a theory of 0-ary functions (a.k.a. constants)
we model them as constant unary functions. -/
/-- The function that is constantly zero on Witt vectors is a polynomial function. -/
instance zeroIsPoly [Fact p.Prime] : IsPoly p fun _ _ _ => 0 :=
⟨⟨0, by intros; funext n; simp only [Pi.zero_apply, AlgHom.map_zero, zero_coeff]⟩⟩
#align witt_vector.zero_is_poly WittVector.zeroIsPoly
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_zero_wittPolynomial [Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ (0 : ℕ → MvPolynomial ℕ R) (wittPolynomial p R n) = 0 := by
rw [← aeval_eq_bind₁, aeval_zero, constantCoeff_wittPolynomial, RingHom.map_zero]
#align witt_vector.bind₁_zero_witt_polynomial WittVector.bind₁_zero_wittPolynomial
/-- The coefficients of `1 : 𝕎 R` as polynomials. -/
def onePoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if n = 0 then 1 else 0
#align witt_vector.one_poly WittVector.onePoly
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/IsPoly.lean | 307 | 315 | theorem bind₁_onePoly_wittPolynomial [hp : Fact p.Prime] (n : ℕ) :
bind₁ onePoly (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) = 1 := by |
rw [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, AlgHom.map_sum, Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [onePoly, one_pow, one_mul, AlgHom.map_pow, C_1, pow_zero, bind₁_X_right, if_true,
eq_self_iff_true]
· intro i _hi hi0
simp only [onePoly, if_neg hi0, zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero,
AlgHom.map_pow, bind₁_X_right, AlgHom.map_mul]
· simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.WithDensity
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.FiniteDimension
#align_import measure_theory.function.strongly_measurable.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3b52265189f3fb43aa631edffce5d060fafaf82f"
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure. We also provide almost everywhere versions of
these notions.
Almost everywhere strongly measurable functions form the largest class of functions that can be
integrated using the Bochner integral.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
* `AEStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `StronglyMeasurable` function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f` is almost everywhere equal to a `FinStronglyMeasurable`
function.
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.sigmaFiniteSet`: a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
## Main statements
* `AEFinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that
`f =ᵐ[μ.restrict tᶜ] 0` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, and for almost everywhere strongly
measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## References
* Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.
-/
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
#align measure_theory.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.FinStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure `μ` if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, StronglyMeasurable g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is `AEFinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is almost everywhere
equal to the limit of a sequence of simple functions with support with finite measure. -/
def AEFinStronglyMeasurable
[Zero β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g μ ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.AEFinStronglyMeasurable
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
@[aesop 30% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
⟨f, hf, EventuallyEq.refl _ _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· have h_univ : f ⁻¹' {x} = Set.univ := by
ext1 y
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
rw [h_univ]
exact MeasurableSet.univ
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.simple_func.strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable
@[nontriviality]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
[MeasurableSingletonClass α] [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-05")]
alias stronglyMeasurable_of_fintype := StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_finite (since := "2024-02-06")]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_finite f
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_of_is_empty MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_finite
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {b : β} :
StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one {α β} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [One β] :
StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) :=
stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_one MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_one
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_zero MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_zero
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' {α β} {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable_const' MeasureTheory.stronglyMeasurable_const'
-- Porting note: changed binding type of `MeasurableSpace α`.
@[simp]
theorem Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' {α β} [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
stronglyMeasurable_const' fun x y => by rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]
#align measure_theory.subsingleton.strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable'
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approx
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.approx_bounded MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_of_norm_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.tendsto_approx_bounded_ae MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approxBounded_ae
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.norm_approx_bounded_le MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.norm_approxBounded_le
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
cases' isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα hα
· simp only [@Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' _ _ ⊥ _ _ f,
eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
#align strongly_measurable_bot_iff stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurable_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq]
refine fun n => (measure_biUnion_finset_le _ _).trans_lt ?_
refine ENNReal.sum_lt_top_iff.mpr fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable_of_set_sigma_finite MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.fin_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.finStronglyMeasurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurable
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align continuous.comp_strongly_measurable Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_mul_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_mulSupport
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.measurable_set_support MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_support
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mono MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mono
protected theorem prod_mk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prod_mk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.prod_mk MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.prod_mk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.comp_measurable MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.comp_measurable
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_left
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_left MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prod_mk_right
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.of_uncurry_right MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.of_uncurry_right
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.mul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.mul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.add_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.add_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_mul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_mul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_add MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_add
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inv MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inv
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.neg MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.neg
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.div MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.div
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sub MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [TopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.const_smul' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prod_mk stronglyMeasurable_const)
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.smul_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.smul_const
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.vadd_const MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.vadd_const
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCommGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
#align is_unit.strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
#align strongly_measurable_const_smul_iff₀ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Sup β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.sup MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.sup
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Inf β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.inf MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.inf
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod' List.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum' List.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
#align list.strongly_measurable_prod List.stronglyMeasurable_prod
#align list.strongly_measurable_sum List.stronglyMeasurable_sum
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_prod' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod'
#align multiset.strongly_measurable_sum' Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_sum'
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 627 | 630 | theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by |
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
#align_import analysis.special_functions.trigonometric.angle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"213b0cff7bc5ab6696ee07cceec80829ce42efec"
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
-- Porting note: can't derive `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited`
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
#align real.angle Real.Angle
namespace Angle
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
-- Porting note (#10754): added due to missing instances due to no deriving
-- also, without this, a plain `QuotientAddGroup.mk`
-- causes coerced terms to be of type `ℝ ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π)`
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
#align real.angle.continuous_coe Real.Angle.continuous_coe
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
#align real.angle.coe_hom Real.Angle.coeHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_coe_hom Real.Angle.coe_coeHom
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
#align real.angle.induction_on Real.Angle.induction_on
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zero Real.Angle.coe_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_add Real.Angle.coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_neg Real.Angle.coe_neg
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_sub Real.Angle.coe_sub
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_nsmul Real.Angle.coe_nsmul
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
#align real.angle.coe_zsmul Real.Angle.coe_zsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul Real.Angle.natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
#align real.angle.coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul Real.Angle.intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_nat_mul_eq_nsmul := natCast_mul_eq_nsmul
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias coe_int_mul_eq_zsmul := intCast_mul_eq_zsmul
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
-- Porting note: added `rw`, `simp [Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]` doesn't fire otherwise
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
#align real.angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub Real.Angle.angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
#align real.angle.coe_two_pi Real.Angle.coe_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align real.angle.neg_coe_pi Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_div_two
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
#align real.angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.zsmul_eq_iff
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
#align real.angle.nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
-- Porting note: no `Int.natAbs_bit0` anymore
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.eq_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.eq_neg_self_iff
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.ne_neg_self_iff Real.Angle.ne_neg_self_iff
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
#align real.angle.neg_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_eq_self_iff
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
#align real.angle.neg_ne_self_iff Real.Angle.neg_ne_self_iff
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ) :) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
cases' cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc hc; · exact hc
cases' sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false_iff, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
#align real.angle.cos_sin_inj Real.Angle.cos_sin_inj
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.sin Real.Angle.sin
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.sin_coe Real.Angle.sin_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_sin Real.Angle.continuous_sin
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
#align real.angle.cos Real.Angle.cos
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
#align real.angle.cos_coe Real.Angle.cos_coe
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
#align real.angle.continuous_cos Real.Angle.continuous_cos
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
#align real.angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg Real.Angle.cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
#align real.angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi Real.Angle.sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
#align real.angle.sin_zero Real.Angle.sin_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
#align real.angle.sin_coe_pi Real.Angle.sin_coe_pi
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
#align real.angle.sin_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.sin_ne_zero_iff Real.Angle.sin_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
#align real.angle.sin_neg Real.Angle.sin_neg
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.sin_antiperiodic Real.Angle.sin_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi Real.Angle.sin_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
#align real.angle.cos_zero Real.Angle.cos_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove it
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
#align real.angle.cos_coe_pi Real.Angle.cos_coe_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
#align real.angle.cos_neg Real.Angle.cos_neg
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
#align real.angle.cos_antiperiodic Real.Angle.cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi Real.Angle.cos_add_pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
#align real.angle.cos_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.cos_eq_zero_iff
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
#align real.angle.sin_add Real.Angle.sin_add
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
#align real.angle.cos_add Real.Angle.cos_add
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
#align real.angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq Real.Angle.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_add_pi_div_two
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.sin_sub_pi_div_two
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.sin_pi_div_two_sub
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_add_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_add_pi_div_two
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
#align real.angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_sub_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
#align real.angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub Real.Angle.cos_pi_div_two_sub
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ico_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIcoMod
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
#align real.angle.coe_to_Ioc_mod Real.Angle.coe_toIocMod
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
#align real.angle.to_real Real.Angle.toReal
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe Real.Angle.toReal_coe
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
#align real.angle.to_real_injective Real.Angle.toReal_injective
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
#align real.angle.to_real_inj Real.Angle.toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
#align real.angle.coe_to_real Real.Angle.coe_toReal
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
#align real.angle.neg_pi_lt_to_real Real.Angle.neg_pi_lt_toReal
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
#align real.angle.to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.toReal_le_pi
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_le_pi Real.Angle.abs_toReal_le_pi
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_mem_Ioc Real.Angle.toReal_mem_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
#align real.angle.to_Ioc_mod_to_real Real.Angle.toIocMod_toReal
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_zero Real.Angle.toReal_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_zero_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_pi Real.Angle.toReal_pi
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_iff
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
#align real.angle.to_real_neg_pi_div_two Real.Angle.toReal_neg_pi_div_two
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.to_real_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_neg_coe_eq_self_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
#align real.angle.abs_to_real_eq_pi_div_two_iff Real.Angle.abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff' h',
le_div_iff' h']
#align real.angle.nsmul_to_real_eq_mul Real.Angle.nsmul_toReal_eq_mul
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;>
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
#align real.angle.to_real_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff Real.Angle.toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
#align real.angle.two_nsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi Real.Angle.two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
#align real.angle.two_zsmul_to_real_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi Real.Angle.two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
#align real.angle.sin_to_real Real.Angle.sin_toReal
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
#align real.angle.cos_to_real Real.Angle.cos_toReal
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
#align real.angle.cos_nonneg_iff_abs_to_real_le_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
#align real.angle.cos_pos_iff_abs_to_real_lt_pi_div_two Real.Angle.cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
#align real.angle.cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_to_real Real.Angle.cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
#align real.angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
#align real.angle.tan Real.Angle.tan
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
#align real.angle.tan_eq_sin_div_cos Real.Angle.tan_eq_sin_div_cos
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
#align real.angle.tan_coe Real.Angle.tan_coe
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
#align real.angle.tan_zero Real.Angle.tan_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can now prove it
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
#align real.angle.tan_coe_pi Real.Angle.tan_coe_pi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 797 | 801 | theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by |
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.NhdsSet
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
#align_import topology.uniform_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"195fcd60ff2bfe392543bceb0ec2adcdb472db4c"
/-!
# Uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups. Many concepts directly
generalize to uniform spaces, e.g.
* uniform continuity (in this file)
* completeness (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* extension of uniform continuous functions to complete spaces (in `UniformEmbedding.lean`)
* totally bounded sets (in `Cauchy.lean`)
* totally bounded complete sets are compact (in `Cauchy.lean`)
A uniform structure on a type `X` is a filter `𝓤 X` on `X × X` satisfying some conditions
which makes it reasonable to say that `∀ᶠ (p : X × X) in 𝓤 X, ...` means
"for all p.1 and p.2 in X close enough, ...". Elements of this filter are called entourages
of `X`. The two main examples are:
* If `X` is a metric space, `V ∈ 𝓤 X ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | dist p.1 p.2 < ε } ⊆ V`
* If `G` is an additive topological group, `V ∈ 𝓤 G ↔ ∃ U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : G), {p | p.2 - p.1 ∈ U} ⊆ V`
Those examples are generalizations in two different directions of the elementary example where
`X = ℝ` and `V ∈ 𝓤 ℝ ↔ ∃ ε > 0, { p | |p.2 - p.1| < ε } ⊆ V` which features both the topological
group structure on `ℝ` and its metric space structure.
Each uniform structure on `X` induces a topology on `X` characterized by
> `nhds_eq_comap_uniformity : ∀ {x : X}, 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 X)`
where `Prod.mk x : X → X × X := (fun y ↦ (x, y))` is the partial evaluation of the product
constructor.
The dictionary with metric spaces includes:
* an upper bound for `dist x y` translates into `(x, y) ∈ V` for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`
* a ball `ball x r` roughly corresponds to `UniformSpace.ball x V := {y | (x, y) ∈ V}`
for some `V ∈ 𝓤 X`, but the later is more general (it includes in
particular both open and closed balls for suitable `V`).
In particular we have:
`isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set X} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ball x V ⊆ s`
The triangle inequality is abstracted to a statement involving the composition of relations in `X`.
First note that the triangle inequality in a metric space is equivalent to
`∀ (x y z : X) (r r' : ℝ), dist x y ≤ r → dist y z ≤ r' → dist x z ≤ r + r'`.
Then, for any `V` and `W` with type `Set (X × X)`, the composition `V ○ W : Set (X × X)` is
defined as `{ p : X × X | ∃ z, (p.1, z) ∈ V ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ W }`.
In the metric space case, if `V = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r }` and `W = { p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r' }`
then the triangle inequality, as reformulated above, says `V ○ W` is contained in
`{p | dist p.1 p.2 ≤ r + r'}` which is the entourage associated to the radius `r + r'`.
In general we have `mem_ball_comp (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) : z ∈ ball x (V ○ W)`.
Note that this discussion does not depend on any axiom imposed on the uniformity filter,
it is simply captured by the definition of composition.
The uniform space axioms ask the filter `𝓤 X` to satisfy the following:
* every `V ∈ 𝓤 X` contains the diagonal `idRel = { p | p.1 = p.2 }`. This abstracts the fact
that `dist x x ≤ r` for every non-negative radius `r` in the metric space case and also that
`x - x` belongs to every neighborhood of zero in the topological group case.
* `V ∈ 𝓤 X → Prod.swap '' V ∈ 𝓤 X`. This is tightly related the fact that `dist x y = dist y x`
in a metric space, and to continuity of negation in the topological group case.
* `∀ V ∈ 𝓤 X, ∃ W ∈ 𝓤 X, W ○ W ⊆ V`. In the metric space case, it corresponds
to cutting the radius of a ball in half and applying the triangle inequality.
In the topological group case, it comes from continuity of addition at `(0, 0)`.
These three axioms are stated more abstractly in the definition below, in terms of
operations on filters, without directly manipulating entourages.
## Main definitions
* `UniformSpace X` is a uniform space structure on a type `X`
* `UniformContinuous f` is a predicate saying a function `f : α → β` between uniform spaces
is uniformly continuous : `∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ (x : α × α) in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r`
In this file we also define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## Implementation notes
There is already a theory of relations in `Data/Rel.lean` where the main definition is
`def Rel (α β : Type*) := α → β → Prop`.
The relations used in the current file involve only one type, but this is not the reason why
we don't reuse `Data/Rel.lean`. We use `Set (α × α)`
instead of `Rel α α` because we really need sets to use the filter library, and elements
of filters on `α × α` have type `Set (α × α)`.
The structure `UniformSpace X` bundles a uniform structure on `X`, a topology on `X` and
an assumption saying those are compatible. This may not seem mathematically reasonable at first,
but is in fact an instance of the forgetful inheritance pattern. See Note [forgetful inheritance]
below.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
/-- The identity relation, or the graph of the identity function -/
def idRel {α : Type*} :=
{ p : α × α | p.1 = p.2 }
#align id_rel idRel
@[simp]
theorem mem_idRel {a b : α} : (a, b) ∈ @idRel α ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_id_rel mem_idRel
@[simp]
theorem idRel_subset {s : Set (α × α)} : idRel ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a, (a, a) ∈ s := by
simp [subset_def]
#align id_rel_subset idRel_subset
/-- The composition of relations -/
def compRel (r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)) :=
{ p : α × α | ∃ z : α, (p.1, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, p.2) ∈ r₂ }
#align comp_rel compRel
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Uniformity] infixl:62 " ○ " => compRel
open Uniformity
@[simp]
theorem mem_compRel {α : Type u} {r₁ r₂ : Set (α × α)} {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ r₁ ○ r₂ ↔ ∃ z, (x, z) ∈ r₁ ∧ (z, y) ∈ r₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align mem_comp_rel mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem swap_idRel : Prod.swap '' idRel = @idRel α :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simpa [image_swap_eq_preimage_swap] using eq_comm
#align swap_id_rel swap_idRel
theorem Monotone.compRel [Preorder β] {f g : β → Set (α × α)} (hf : Monotone f) (hg : Monotone g) :
Monotone fun x => f x ○ g x := fun _ _ h _ ⟨z, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨z, hf h h₁, hg h h₂⟩
#align monotone.comp_rel Monotone.compRel
@[mono]
theorem compRel_mono {f g h k : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : f ⊆ h) (h₂ : g ⊆ k) : f ○ g ⊆ h ○ k :=
fun _ ⟨z, h, h'⟩ => ⟨z, h₁ h, h₂ h'⟩
#align comp_rel_mono compRel_mono
theorem prod_mk_mem_compRel {a b c : α} {s t : Set (α × α)} (h₁ : (a, c) ∈ s) (h₂ : (c, b) ∈ t) :
(a, b) ∈ s ○ t :=
⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩
#align prod_mk_mem_comp_rel prod_mk_mem_compRel
@[simp]
theorem id_compRel {r : Set (α × α)} : idRel ○ r = r :=
Set.ext fun ⟨a, b⟩ => by simp
#align id_comp_rel id_compRel
theorem compRel_assoc {r s t : Set (α × α)} : r ○ s ○ t = r ○ (s ○ t) := by
ext ⟨a, b⟩; simp only [mem_compRel]; tauto
#align comp_rel_assoc compRel_assoc
theorem left_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ t) : s ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨_x, y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨y, xy_in, h <| rfl⟩
#align left_subset_comp_rel left_subset_compRel
theorem right_subset_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : t ⊆ s ○ t := fun ⟨x, _y⟩ xy_in =>
⟨x, h <| rfl, xy_in⟩
#align right_subset_comp_rel right_subset_compRel
theorem subset_comp_self {s : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
left_subset_compRel h
#align subset_comp_self subset_comp_self
theorem subset_iterate_compRel {s t : Set (α × α)} (h : idRel ⊆ s) (n : ℕ) :
t ⊆ (s ○ ·)^[n] t := by
induction' n with n ihn generalizing t
exacts [Subset.rfl, (right_subset_compRel h).trans ihn]
#align subset_iterate_comp_rel subset_iterate_compRel
/-- The relation is invariant under swapping factors. -/
def SymmetricRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Prop :=
Prod.swap ⁻¹' V = V
#align symmetric_rel SymmetricRel
/-- The maximal symmetric relation contained in a given relation. -/
def symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : Set (α × α) :=
V ∩ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V
#align symmetrize_rel symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetric_symmetrizeRel (V : Set (α × α)) : SymmetricRel (symmetrizeRel V) := by
simp [SymmetricRel, symmetrizeRel, preimage_inter, inter_comm, ← preimage_comp]
#align symmetric_symmetrize_rel symmetric_symmetrizeRel
theorem symmetrizeRel_subset_self (V : Set (α × α)) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ V :=
sep_subset _ _
#align symmetrize_rel_subset_self symmetrizeRel_subset_self
@[mono]
theorem symmetrize_mono {V W : Set (α × α)} (h : V ⊆ W) : symmetrizeRel V ⊆ symmetrizeRel W :=
inter_subset_inter h <| preimage_mono h
#align symmetrize_mono symmetrize_mono
theorem SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y : α} :
(x, y) ∈ V ↔ (y, x) ∈ V :=
Set.ext_iff.1 hV (y, x)
#align symmetric_rel.mk_mem_comm SymmetricRel.mk_mem_comm
theorem SymmetricRel.eq {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) : Prod.swap ⁻¹' U = U :=
hU
#align symmetric_rel.eq SymmetricRel.eq
theorem SymmetricRel.inter {U V : Set (α × α)} (hU : SymmetricRel U) (hV : SymmetricRel V) :
SymmetricRel (U ∩ V) := by rw [SymmetricRel, preimage_inter, hU.eq, hV.eq]
#align symmetric_rel.inter SymmetricRel.inter
/-- This core description of a uniform space is outside of the type class hierarchy. It is useful
for constructions of uniform spaces, when the topology is derived from the uniform space. -/
structure UniformSpace.Core (α : Type u) where
/-- The uniformity filter. Once `UniformSpace` is defined, `𝓤 α` (`_root_.uniformity`) becomes the
normal form. -/
uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- Every set in the uniformity filter includes the diagonal. -/
refl : 𝓟 idRel ≤ uniformity
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
#align uniform_space.core UniformSpace.Core
protected theorem UniformSpace.Core.comp_mem_uniformity_sets {c : Core α} {s : Set (α × α)}
(hs : s ∈ c.uniformity) : ∃ t ∈ c.uniformity, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| c.comp hs
/-- An alternative constructor for `UniformSpace.Core`. This version unfolds various
`Filter`-related definitions. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mk' {α : Type u} (U : Filter (α × α)) (refl : ∀ r ∈ U, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r)
(symm : ∀ r ∈ U, Prod.swap ⁻¹' r ∈ U) (comp : ∀ r ∈ U, ∃ t ∈ U, t ○ t ⊆ r) :
UniformSpace.Core α :=
⟨U, fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 (refl _ ru), symm, fun _r ru =>
let ⟨_s, hs, hsr⟩ := comp _ ru
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) hsr⟩
#align uniform_space.core.mk' UniformSpace.Core.mk'
/-- Defining a `UniformSpace.Core` from a filter basis satisfying some uniformity-like axioms. -/
def UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis {α : Type u} (B : FilterBasis (α × α))
(refl : ∀ r ∈ B, ∀ (x), (x, x) ∈ r) (symm : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ⊆ Prod.swap ⁻¹' r)
(comp : ∀ r ∈ B, ∃ t ∈ B, t ○ t ⊆ r) : UniformSpace.Core α where
uniformity := B.filter
refl := B.hasBasis.ge_iff.mpr fun _r ru => idRel_subset.2 <| refl _ ru
symm := (B.hasBasis.tendsto_iff B.hasBasis).mpr symm
comp := (HasBasis.le_basis_iff (B.hasBasis.lift' (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id))
B.hasBasis).2 comp
#align uniform_space.core.mk_of_basis UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis
/-- A uniform space generates a topological space -/
def UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) :
TopologicalSpace α :=
.mkOfNhds fun x ↦ .comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity
#align uniform_space.core.to_topological_space UniformSpace.Core.toTopologicalSpace
theorem UniformSpace.Core.ext :
∀ {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace.Core α}, u₁.uniformity = u₂.uniformity → u₁ = u₂
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align uniform_space.core_eq UniformSpace.Core.ext
theorem UniformSpace.Core.nhds_toTopologicalSpace {α : Type u} (u : Core α) (x : α) :
@nhds α u.toTopologicalSpace x = comap (Prod.mk x) u.uniformity := by
apply TopologicalSpace.nhds_mkOfNhds_of_hasBasis (fun _ ↦ (basis_sets _).comap _)
· exact fun a U hU ↦ u.refl hU rfl
· intro a U hU
rcases u.comp_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with b hb
filter_upwards [preimage_mem_comap hV] with c hc
exact hVU ⟨b, hb, hc⟩
-- the topological structure is embedded in the uniform structure
-- to avoid instance diamond issues. See Note [forgetful inheritance].
/-- A uniform space is a generalization of the "uniform" topological aspects of a
metric space. It consists of a filter on `α × α` called the "uniformity", which
satisfies properties analogous to the reflexivity, symmetry, and triangle properties
of a metric.
A metric space has a natural uniformity, and a uniform space has a natural topology.
A topological group also has a natural uniformity, even when it is not metrizable. -/
class UniformSpace (α : Type u) extends TopologicalSpace α where
/-- The uniformity filter. -/
protected uniformity : Filter (α × α)
/-- If `s ∈ uniformity`, then `Prod.swap ⁻¹' s ∈ uniformity`. -/
protected symm : Tendsto Prod.swap uniformity uniformity
/-- For every set `u ∈ uniformity`, there exists `v ∈ uniformity` such that `v ○ v ⊆ u`. -/
protected comp : (uniformity.lift' fun s => s ○ s) ≤ uniformity
/-- The uniformity agrees with the topology: the neighborhoods filter of each point `x`
is equal to `Filter.comap (Prod.mk x) (𝓤 α)`. -/
protected nhds_eq_comap_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 x = comap (Prod.mk x) uniformity
#align uniform_space UniformSpace
#noalign uniform_space.mk' -- Can't be a `match_pattern`, so not useful anymore
/-- The uniformity is a filter on α × α (inferred from an ambient uniform space
structure on α). -/
def uniformity (α : Type u) [UniformSpace α] : Filter (α × α) :=
@UniformSpace.uniformity α _
#align uniformity uniformity
/-- Notation for the uniformity filter with respect to a non-standard `UniformSpace` instance. -/
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤[" u "]" => @uniformity _ u
@[inherit_doc] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: should we drop the `uniformity` def?
scoped[Uniformity] notation "𝓤" => uniformity
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `u : UniformSpace.Core` and a `TopologicalSpace` structure
that is equal to `u.toTopologicalSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCoreEq {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := t
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq UniformSpace.ofCoreEq
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.ofCore {α : Type u} (u : UniformSpace.Core α) : UniformSpace α :=
.ofCoreEq u _ rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core UniformSpace.ofCore
/-- Construct a `UniformSpace.Core` from a `UniformSpace`. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.toCore (u : UniformSpace α) : UniformSpace.Core α where
__ := u
refl := by
rintro U hU ⟨x, y⟩ (rfl : x = y)
have : Prod.mk x ⁻¹' U ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact preimage_mem_comap hU
convert mem_of_mem_nhds this
theorem UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace (u : UniformSpace α) :
u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by
rw [u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u.toCore.nhds_toTopologicalSpace]
#align uniform_space.to_core_to_topological_space UniformSpace.toCore_toTopologicalSpace
/-- Build a `UniformSpace` from a `UniformSpace.Core` and a compatible topology.
Use `UniformSpace.mk` instead to avoid proving
the unnecessary assumption `UniformSpace.Core.refl`.
The main constructor used to use a different compatibility assumption.
This definition was created as a step towards porting to a new definition.
Now the main definition is ported,
so this constructor will be removed in a few months. -/
@[deprecated UniformSpace.mk (since := "2024-03-20")]
def UniformSpace.ofNhdsEqComap (u : UniformSpace.Core α) (_t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : ∀ x, 𝓝 x = u.uniformity.comap (Prod.mk x)) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := h
@[ext]
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u₁] = 𝓤[u₂]) : u₁ = u₂ := by
have : u₁.toTopologicalSpace = u₂.toTopologicalSpace := TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun x ↦ by
rw [u₁.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, u₂.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact congr_arg (comap _) h
cases u₁; cases u₂; congr
#align uniform_space_eq UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.ext_iff {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} :
u₁ = u₂ ↔ ∀ s, s ∈ 𝓤[u₁] ↔ s ∈ 𝓤[u₂] :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore (u : UniformSpace α) (t : TopologicalSpace α)
(h : t = u.toCore.toTopologicalSpace) : .ofCoreEq u.toCore t h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.of_core_eq_to_core UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore
/-- Replace topology in a `UniformSpace` instance with a propositionally (but possibly not
definitionally) equal one. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.replaceTopology {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : UniformSpace α where
__ := u
toTopologicalSpace := i
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by rw [h, u.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.replace_topology UniformSpace.replaceTopology
theorem UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq {α : Type*} [i : TopologicalSpace α] (u : UniformSpace α)
(h : i = u.toTopologicalSpace) : u.replaceTopology h = u :=
UniformSpace.ext rfl
#align uniform_space.replace_topology_eq UniformSpace.replaceTopology_eq
-- Porting note: rfc: use `UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis`? This will change defeq here and there
/-- Define a `UniformSpace` using a "distance" function. The function can be, e.g., the
distance in a (usual or extended) metric space or an absolute value on a ring. -/
def UniformSpace.ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [OrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
UniformSpace α :=
.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 { x | d x.1 x.2 < r }
refl := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => principal_mono.2 <| idRel_subset.2 fun x => by simpa [refl]
symm := tendsto_iInf_iInf fun r => tendsto_iInf_iInf fun _ => tendsto_principal_principal.2
fun x hx => by rwa [mem_setOf, symm]
comp := le_iInf₂ fun r hr => let ⟨δ, h0, hδr⟩ := half r hr; le_principal_iff.2 <|
mem_of_superset
(mem_lift' <| mem_iInf_of_mem δ <| mem_iInf_of_mem h0 <| mem_principal_self _)
fun (x, z) ⟨y, h₁, h₂⟩ => (triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (hδr _ h₁ _ h₂) }
#align uniform_space.of_fun UniformSpace.ofFun
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun {α : Type u} {β : Type v} [LinearOrderedAddCommMonoid β]
(h₀ : ∃ x : β, 0 < x) (d : α → α → β) (refl : ∀ x, d x x = 0) (symm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x)
(triangle : ∀ x y z, d x z ≤ d x y + d y z)
(half : ∀ ε > (0 : β), ∃ δ > (0 : β), ∀ x < δ, ∀ y < δ, x + y < ε) :
𝓤[.ofFun d refl symm triangle half].HasBasis ((0 : β) < ·) (fun ε => { x | d x.1 x.2 < ε }) :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun ε₁ h₁ ε₂ h₂ => ⟨min ε₁ ε₂, lt_min h₁ h₂, fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_left _ _),
fun _x hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx (min_le_right _ _)⟩) h₀
#align uniform_space.has_basis_of_fun UniformSpace.hasBasis_ofFun
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
UniformSpace.nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity nhds_eq_comap_uniformity
theorem isOpen_uniformity {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align is_open_uniformity isOpen_uniformity
theorem refl_le_uniformity : 𝓟 idRel ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(@UniformSpace.toCore α _).refl
#align refl_le_uniformity refl_le_uniformity
instance uniformity.neBot [Nonempty α] : NeBot (𝓤 α) :=
diagonal_nonempty.principal_neBot.mono refl_le_uniformity
#align uniformity.ne_bot uniformity.neBot
theorem refl_mem_uniformity {x : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : (x, x) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h rfl
#align refl_mem_uniformity refl_mem_uniformity
theorem mem_uniformity_of_eq {x y : α} {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (hx : x = y) : (x, y) ∈ s :=
refl_le_uniformity h hx
#align mem_uniformity_of_eq mem_uniformity_of_eq
theorem symm_le_uniformity : map (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 _) ≤ 𝓤 _ :=
UniformSpace.symm
#align symm_le_uniformity symm_le_uniformity
theorem comp_le_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
UniformSpace.comp
#align comp_le_uniformity comp_le_uniformity
theorem lift'_comp_uniformity : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s) = 𝓤 α :=
comp_le_uniformity.antisymm <| le_lift'.2 fun _s hs ↦ mem_of_superset hs <|
subset_comp_self <| idRel_subset.2 fun _ ↦ refl_mem_uniformity hs
theorem tendsto_swap_uniformity : Tendsto (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 α) :=
symm_le_uniformity
#align tendsto_swap_uniformity tendsto_swap_uniformity
theorem comp_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
(mem_lift'_sets <| monotone_id.compRel monotone_id).mp <| comp_le_uniformity hs
#align comp_mem_uniformity_sets comp_mem_uniformity_sets
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction' n with n ihn generalizing s
· simpa
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
#align eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
#align eventually_uniformity_comp_subset eventually_uniformity_comp_subset
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is transitive. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans {l : Filter β} {f₁ f₂ f₃ : β → α}
(h₁₂ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₂ x)) l (𝓤 α))
(h₂₃ : Tendsto (fun x => (f₂ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α)) : Tendsto (fun x => (f₁ x, f₃ x)) l (𝓤 α) := by
refine le_trans (le_lift'.2 fun s hs => mem_map.2 ?_) comp_le_uniformity
filter_upwards [mem_map.1 (h₁₂ hs), mem_map.1 (h₂₃ hs)] with x hx₁₂ hx₂₃ using ⟨_, hx₁₂, hx₂₃⟩
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_trans Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_trans
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is symmetric. -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm {l : Filter β} {f : β → α × α} (h : Tendsto f l (𝓤 α)) :
Tendsto (fun x => ((f x).2, (f x).1)) l (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp h
#align filter.tendsto.uniformity_symm Filter.Tendsto.uniformity_symm
/-- Relation `fun f g ↦ Tendsto (fun x ↦ (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 α)` is reflexive. -/
theorem tendsto_diag_uniformity (f : β → α) (l : Filter β) :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f x)) l (𝓤 α) := fun _s hs =>
mem_map.2 <| univ_mem' fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hs
#align tendsto_diag_uniformity tendsto_diag_uniformity
theorem tendsto_const_uniformity {a : α} {f : Filter β} : Tendsto (fun _ => (a, a)) f (𝓤 α) :=
tendsto_diag_uniformity (fun _ => a) f
#align tendsto_const_uniformity tendsto_const_uniformity
theorem symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ⊆ s :=
have : preimage Prod.swap s ∈ 𝓤 α := symm_le_uniformity hs
⟨s ∩ preimage Prod.swap s, inter_mem hs this, fun _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨h₂, h₁⟩, inter_subset_left⟩
#align symm_of_uniformity symm_of_uniformity
theorem comp_symm_of_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, (∀ {a b}, (a, b) ∈ t → (b, a) ∈ t) ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t', ht', ht'₁, ht'₂⟩ := symm_of_uniformity ht₁
⟨t', ht', ht'₁ _ _, Subset.trans (monotone_id.compRel monotone_id ht'₂) ht₂⟩
#align comp_symm_of_uniformity comp_symm_of_uniformity
theorem uniformity_le_symm : 𝓤 α ≤ @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α := by
rw [map_swap_eq_comap_swap]; exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.le_comap
#align uniformity_le_symm uniformity_le_symm
theorem uniformity_eq_symm : 𝓤 α = @Prod.swap α α <$> 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm uniformity_le_symm symm_le_uniformity
#align uniformity_eq_symm uniformity_eq_symm
@[simp]
theorem comap_swap_uniformity : comap (@Prod.swap α α) (𝓤 α) = 𝓤 α :=
(congr_arg _ uniformity_eq_symm).trans <| comap_map Prod.swap_injective
#align comap_swap_uniformity comap_swap_uniformity
theorem symmetrize_mem_uniformity {V : Set (α × α)} (h : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : symmetrizeRel V ∈ 𝓤 α := by
apply (𝓤 α).inter_sets h
rw [← image_swap_eq_preimage_swap, uniformity_eq_symm]
exact image_mem_map h
#align symmetrize_mem_uniformity symmetrize_mem_uniformity
/-- Symmetric entourages form a basis of `𝓤 α` -/
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun t t_in =>
⟨symmetrizeRel t, symmetrize_mem_uniformity t_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel t,
symmetrizeRel_subset_self t⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_symmetric UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric
theorem uniformity_lift_le_swap {g : Set (α × α) → Filter β} {f : Filter β} (hg : Monotone g)
(h : ((𝓤 α).lift fun s => g (preimage Prod.swap s)) ≤ f) : (𝓤 α).lift g ≤ f :=
calc
(𝓤 α).lift g ≤ (Filter.map (@Prod.swap α α) <| 𝓤 α).lift g :=
lift_mono uniformity_le_symm le_rfl
_ ≤ _ := by rw [map_lift_eq2 hg, image_swap_eq_preimage_swap]; exact h
#align uniformity_lift_le_swap uniformity_lift_le_swap
theorem uniformity_lift_le_comp {f : Set (α × α) → Filter β} (h : Monotone f) :
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f :=
calc
((𝓤 α).lift fun s => f (s ○ s)) = ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ s).lift f := by
rw [lift_lift'_assoc]
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id
· exact h
_ ≤ (𝓤 α).lift f := lift_mono comp_le_uniformity le_rfl
#align uniformity_lift_le_comp uniformity_lift_le_comp
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem comp3_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, t ○ (t ○ t) ⊆ s :=
let ⟨_t', ht', ht's⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
let ⟨t, ht, htt'⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets ht'
⟨t, ht, (compRel_mono ((subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity ht)).trans htt') htt').trans ht's⟩
/-- See also `comp3_mem_uniformity`. -/
theorem comp_le_uniformity3 : ((𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => s ○ (s ○ s)) ≤ 𝓤 α := fun _ h =>
let ⟨_t, htU, ht⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity h
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' htU) ht
#align comp_le_uniformity3 comp_le_uniformity3
/-- See also `comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets`. -/
theorem comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨w, w_in, w_sub⟩ : ∃ w ∈ 𝓤 α, w ○ w ⊆ s := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
use symmetrizeRel w, symmetrize_mem_uniformity w_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel w
have : symmetrizeRel w ⊆ w := symmetrizeRel_subset_self w
calc symmetrizeRel w ○ symmetrizeRel w
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
theorem subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : s ⊆ s ○ s :=
subset_comp_self (refl_le_uniformity h)
#align subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity
theorem comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨w, w_in, _, w_sub⟩
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets w_in with ⟨t, t_in, t_symm, t_sub⟩
use t, t_in, t_symm
have : t ⊆ t ○ t := subset_comp_self_of_mem_uniformity t_in
-- Porting note: Needed the following `have`s to make `mono` work
have ht := Subset.refl t
have hw := Subset.refl w
calc
t ○ t ○ t ⊆ w ○ t := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ (t ○ t) := by mono
_ ⊆ w ○ w := by mono
_ ⊆ s := w_sub
#align comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
/-- The ball around `(x : β)` with respect to `(V : Set (β × β))`. Intended to be
used for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`, but this is not needed for the definition. Recovers the
notions of metric space ball when `V = {p | dist p.1 p.2 < r }`. -/
def UniformSpace.ball (x : β) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set β :=
Prod.mk x ⁻¹' V
#align uniform_space.ball UniformSpace.ball
open UniformSpace (ball)
theorem UniformSpace.mem_ball_self (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : x ∈ ball x V :=
refl_mem_uniformity hV
#align uniform_space.mem_ball_self UniformSpace.mem_ball_self
/-- The triangle inequality for `UniformSpace.ball` -/
theorem mem_ball_comp {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z} (h : y ∈ ball x V) (h' : z ∈ ball y W) :
z ∈ ball x (V ○ W) :=
prod_mk_mem_compRel h h'
#align mem_ball_comp mem_ball_comp
theorem ball_subset_of_comp_subset {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y} (h : x ∈ ball y W) (h' : W ○ W ⊆ V) :
ball x W ⊆ ball y V := fun _z z_in => h' (mem_ball_comp h z_in)
#align ball_subset_of_comp_subset ball_subset_of_comp_subset
theorem ball_mono {V W : Set (β × β)} (h : V ⊆ W) (x : β) : ball x V ⊆ ball x W :=
preimage_mono h
#align ball_mono ball_mono
theorem ball_inter (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) = ball x V ∩ ball x W :=
preimage_inter
#align ball_inter ball_inter
theorem ball_inter_left (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x V :=
ball_mono inter_subset_left x
#align ball_inter_left ball_inter_left
theorem ball_inter_right (x : β) (V W : Set (β × β)) : ball x (V ∩ W) ⊆ ball x W :=
ball_mono inter_subset_right x
#align ball_inter_right ball_inter_right
theorem mem_ball_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x y} :
x ∈ ball y V ↔ y ∈ ball x V :=
show (x, y) ∈ Prod.swap ⁻¹' V ↔ (x, y) ∈ V by
unfold SymmetricRel at hV
rw [hV]
#align mem_ball_symmetry mem_ball_symmetry
theorem ball_eq_of_symmetry {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : SymmetricRel V) {x} :
ball x V = { y | (y, x) ∈ V } := by
ext y
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV]
exact Iff.rfl
#align ball_eq_of_symmetry ball_eq_of_symmetry
theorem mem_comp_of_mem_ball {V W : Set (β × β)} {x y z : β} (hV : SymmetricRel V)
(hx : x ∈ ball z V) (hy : y ∈ ball z W) : (x, y) ∈ V ○ W := by
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hV] at hx
exact ⟨z, hx, hy⟩
#align mem_comp_of_mem_ball mem_comp_of_mem_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
#align uniform_space.is_open_ball UniformSpace.isOpen_ball
theorem UniformSpace.isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) :
IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| continuous_const.prod_mk continuous_id
theorem mem_comp_comp {V W M : Set (β × β)} (hW' : SymmetricRel W) {p : β × β} :
p ∈ V ○ M ○ W ↔ (ball p.1 V ×ˢ ball p.2 W ∩ M).Nonempty := by
cases' p with x y
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, ⟨w, hpw, hwz⟩, hzy⟩
exact ⟨(w, z), ⟨hpw, by rwa [mem_ball_symmetry hW']⟩, hwz⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨w, z⟩, ⟨w_in, z_in⟩, hwz⟩
rw [mem_ball_symmetry hW'] at z_in
exact ⟨z, ⟨w, w_in, hwz⟩, z_in⟩
#align mem_comp_comp mem_comp_comp
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.1 = x → p.2 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
simp only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap_prod_mk]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right
theorem mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ { p : α × α | p.2 = x → p.1 ∈ s } ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_symm, mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right]
simp only [map_def, mem_map, preimage_setOf_eq, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap]
#align mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_left
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem {x : α} {T : Set α} (hx : x ∈ T) (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (T ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) := by
simp [nhdsWithin, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, hx]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity {x : α} (S : Set α) :
𝓝[S] x = (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (univ ×ˢ S)).comap (Prod.mk x) :=
nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem (mem_univ _) S
/-- See also `isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset`. -/
theorem isOpen_iff_ball_subset {s : Set α} : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap, ball]
#align is_open_iff_ball_subset isOpen_iff_ball_subset
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity' {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => ball x (s i) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity]
exact h.comap (Prod.mk x)
#align nhds_basis_uniformity' nhds_basis_uniformity'
theorem nhds_basis_uniformity {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)} (h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s)
{x : α} : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p fun i => { y | (y, x) ∈ s i } := by
replace h := h.comap Prod.swap
rw [comap_swap_uniformity] at h
exact nhds_basis_uniformity' h
#align nhds_basis_uniformity nhds_basis_uniformity
theorem nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).comap fun y => (y, x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_of_same_basis <| (𝓤 α).basis_sets.comap _
#align nhds_eq_comap_uniformity' nhds_eq_comap_uniformity'
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff {x : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, mem_comap]
simp_rw [ball]
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds (x : α) ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝 x := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
#align uniform_space.ball_mem_nhds UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhds
theorem UniformSpace.ball_mem_nhdsWithin {x : α} {S : Set α} ⦃V : Set (α × α)⦄ (x_in : x ∈ S)
(V_in : V ∈ 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)) : ball x V ∈ 𝓝[S] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin_eq_comap_uniformity_of_mem x_in, mem_comap]
exact ⟨V, V_in, Subset.rfl⟩
theorem UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm {x : α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, SymmetricRel V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
use symmetrizeRel V, symmetrize_mem_uniformity V_in, symmetric_symmetrizeRel V
exact Subset.trans (ball_mono (symmetrizeRel_subset_self V) x) V_sub
· rintro ⟨V, V_in, _, V_sub⟩
exact ⟨V, V_in, V_sub⟩
#align uniform_space.mem_nhds_iff_symm UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds (x : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 x) (fun s : Set (α × α) => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s :=
⟨fun t => by simp [UniformSpace.mem_nhds_iff_symm, and_assoc]⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_nhds UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds
open UniformSpace
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → SymmetricRel V → (s ∩ ball x V).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (hasBasis_nhds x), Set.Nonempty]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_symm_ball
theorem UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball {s : Set α} {x} :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ {V}, V ∈ 𝓤 α → (ball x V ∩ s).Nonempty := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets)]
#align uniform_space.mem_closure_iff_ball UniformSpace.mem_closure_iff_ball
theorem UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
#align uniform_space.has_basis_nhds_prod UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' (ball x) :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_biInf
#align nhds_eq_uniformity nhds_eq_uniformity
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity' {x : α} : 𝓝 x = (𝓤 α).lift' fun s => { y | (y, x) ∈ s } :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity (𝓤 α).basis_sets).eq_biInf
#align nhds_eq_uniformity' nhds_eq_uniformity'
theorem mem_nhds_left (x : α) {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : { y : α | (x, y) ∈ s } ∈ 𝓝 x :=
ball_mem_nhds x h
#align mem_nhds_left mem_nhds_left
theorem mem_nhds_right (y : α) {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : { x : α | (x, y) ∈ s } ∈ 𝓝 y :=
mem_nhds_left _ (symm_le_uniformity h)
#align mem_nhds_right mem_nhds_right
theorem exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds {a : α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ 𝓝 a) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 a, ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a' ∈ V, UniformSpace.ball a' t ⊆ U :=
let ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets (mem_nhds_uniformity_iff_right.1 h)
⟨_, mem_nhds_left a ht, t, ht, fun a₁ h₁ a₂ h₂ => @htU (a, a₂) ⟨a₁, h₁, h₂⟩ rfl⟩
#align exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds exists_mem_nhds_ball_subset_of_mem_nhds
theorem tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : Tendsto (fun a' => (a', a)) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) := fun _ =>
mem_nhds_right a
#align tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity tendsto_right_nhds_uniformity
theorem tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity {a : α} : Tendsto (fun a' => (a, a')) (𝓝 a) (𝓤 α) := fun _ =>
mem_nhds_left a
#align tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity tendsto_left_nhds_uniformity
theorem lift_nhds_left {x : α} {g : Set α → Filter β} (hg : Monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) => g (ball x s) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_lift_eq2 hg]
simp_rw [ball, Function.comp]
#align lift_nhds_left lift_nhds_left
theorem lift_nhds_right {x : α} {g : Set α → Filter β} (hg : Monotone g) :
(𝓝 x).lift g = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) => g { y | (y, x) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', comap_lift_eq2 hg]
simp_rw [Function.comp, preimage]
#align lift_nhds_right lift_nhds_right
theorem nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 a ×ˢ 𝓝 b = (𝓤 α).lift fun s : Set (α × α) =>
(𝓤 α).lift' fun t => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ t } := by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity', nhds_eq_uniformity, prod_lift'_lift']
exacts [rfl, monotone_preimage, monotone_preimage]
#align nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
#align nhds_eq_uniformity_prod nhds_eq_uniformity_prod
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
#align nhdset_of_mem_uniformity nhdset_of_mem_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
#align nhds_le_uniformity nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
#align supr_nhds_le_uniformity iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
#align nhds_set_diagonal_le_uniformity nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
#align closure_eq_uniformity closure_eq_uniformity
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_closed uniformity_hasBasis_closed
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
#align uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_closure Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
#align uniformity_has_basis_closure uniformity_hasBasis_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ SymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun V₁ V₂ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
#align closure_eq_inter_uniformity closure_eq_inter_uniformity
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun s hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
#align uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
#align interior_mem_uniformity interior_mem_uniformity
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
#align mem_uniformity_is_closed mem_uniformity_isClosed
theorem isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
#align is_open_iff_open_ball_subset isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
#align dense.bUnion_uniformity_ball Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_open uniformity_hasBasis_open
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
#align filter.has_basis.mem_uniformity_iff Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ SymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
#align uniformity_has_basis_open_symmetric uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ SymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
#align comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, SymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
#align uniform_space.has_seq_basis UniformSpace.has_seq_basis
end
theorem Filter.HasBasis.biInter_biUnion_ball {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : HasBasis (𝓤 α) p U) (s : Set α) :
(⋂ (i) (_ : p i), ⋃ x ∈ s, ball x (U i)) = closure s := by
ext x
simp [mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (nhds_basis_uniformity h), ball]
#align filter.has_basis.bInter_bUnion_ball Filter.HasBasis.biInter_biUnion_ball
/-! ### Uniform continuity -/
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* if `(f x, f y)` tends to the diagonal
as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal. In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then
`f x` is close to `f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `α`. -/
def UniformContinuous [UniformSpace β] (f : α → β) :=
Tendsto (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α) (𝓤 β)
#align uniform_continuous UniformContinuous
/-- Notation for uniform continuity with respect to non-standard `UniformSpace` instances. -/
scoped[Uniformity] notation "UniformContinuous[" u₁ ", " u₂ "]" => @UniformContinuous _ _ u₁ u₂
/-- A function `f : α → β` is *uniformly continuous* on `s : Set α` if `(f x, f y)` tends to
the diagonal as `(x, y)` tends to the diagonal while remaining in `s ×ˢ s`.
In other words, if `x` is sufficiently close to `y`, then `f x` is close to
`f y` no matter where `x` and `y` are located in `s`. -/
def UniformContinuousOn [UniformSpace β] (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
Tendsto (fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s)) (𝓤 β)
#align uniform_continuous_on UniformContinuousOn
theorem uniformContinuous_def [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, { x : α × α | (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r } ∈ 𝓤 α :=
Iff.rfl
#align uniform_continuous_def uniformContinuous_def
theorem uniformContinuous_iff_eventually [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ r ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ x : α × α in 𝓤 α, (f x.1, f x.2) ∈ r :=
Iff.rfl
#align uniform_continuous_iff_eventually uniformContinuous_iff_eventually
theorem uniformContinuousOn_univ [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuousOn f univ ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, UniformContinuous, univ_prod_univ, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
#align uniform_continuous_on_univ uniformContinuousOn_univ
theorem uniformContinuous_of_const [UniformSpace β] {c : α → β} (h : ∀ a b, c a = c b) :
UniformContinuous c :=
have : (fun x : α × α => (c x.fst, c x.snd)) ⁻¹' idRel = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun ⟨a, b⟩ => h a b
le_trans (map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <| by simp [comap_principal, this, univ_mem]) refl_le_uniformity
#align uniform_continuous_of_const uniformContinuous_of_const
theorem uniformContinuous_id : UniformContinuous (@id α) := tendsto_id
#align uniform_continuous_id uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_const [UniformSpace β] {b : β} : UniformContinuous fun _ : α => b :=
uniformContinuous_of_const fun _ _ => rfl
#align uniform_continuous_const uniformContinuous_const
nonrec theorem UniformContinuous.comp [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformContinuous f) : UniformContinuous (g ∘ f) :=
hg.comp hf
#align uniform_continuous.comp UniformContinuous.comp
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuous_iff {ι'} [UniformSpace β] {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (α × α)} (ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {q : ι' → Prop} {t : ι' → Set (β × β)}
(hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis q t) {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ ∀ i, q i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
(ha.tendsto_iff hb).trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall]
#align filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_iff Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuous_iff
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuousOn_iff {ι'} [UniformSpace β] {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (α × α)} (ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {q : ι' → Prop} {t : ι' → Set (β × β)}
(hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis q t) {f : α → β} {S : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f S ↔
∀ i, q i → ∃ j, p j ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ S → ∀ y, y ∈ S → (x, y) ∈ s j → (f x, f y) ∈ t i :=
((ha.inf_principal (S ×ˢ S)).tendsto_iff hb).trans <| by
simp_rw [Prod.forall, Set.inter_comm (s _), forall_mem_comm, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod, and_imp]
#align filter.has_basis.uniform_continuous_on_iff Filter.HasBasis.uniformContinuousOn_iff
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Inf (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
#align infi_uniformity iInf_uniformity
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
#align inf_uniformity inf_uniformity
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
#align inhabited_uniform_space inhabitedUniformSpace
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
#align inhabited_uniform_space_core inhabitedUniformSpaceCore
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp]
#align uniform_space.comap UniformSpace.comap
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
#align uniformity_comap uniformity_comap
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
#align uniform_space_comap_id uniformSpace_comap_id
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
#align uniform_space.comap_comap UniformSpace.comap_comap
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
#align uniform_space.comap_inf UniformSpace.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
#align uniform_space.comap_infi UniformSpace.comap_iInf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
#align uniform_space.comap_mono UniformSpace.comap_mono
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
#align uniform_continuous_iff uniformContinuous_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,292 | 1,294 | theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by |
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Piecewise
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Preimage
#align_import algebra.big_operators.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Big operators
In this file we define products and sums indexed by finite sets (specifically, `Finset`).
## Notation
We introduce the following notation.
Let `s` be a `Finset α`, and `f : α → β` a function.
* `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f` (assuming `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f` (assuming `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
* `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is a `CommMonoid`)
* `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`
(assuming `α` is a `Fintype` and `β` is an `AddCommMonoid`)
## Implementation Notes
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
-/
-- TODO
-- assert_not_exists AddCommMonoidWithOne
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists MulAction
variable {ι κ α β γ : Type*}
open Fin Function
namespace Finset
/-- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is the product of `f x`
as `x` ranges over the elements of the finite set `s`.
-/
@[to_additive "`∑ x ∈ s, f x` is the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements
of the finite set `s`."]
protected def prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : β :=
(s.1.map f).prod
#align finset.prod Finset.prod
#align finset.sum Finset.sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_mk [CommMonoid β] (s : Multiset α) (hs : s.Nodup) (f : α → β) :
(⟨s, hs⟩ : Finset α).prod f = (s.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_mk Finset.prod_mk
#align finset.sum_mk Finset.sum_mk
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_val [CommMonoid α] (s : Finset α) : s.1.prod = s.prod id := by
rw [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_val Finset.prod_val
#align finset.sum_val Finset.sum_val
end Finset
library_note "operator precedence of big operators"/--
There is no established mathematical convention
for the operator precedence of big operators like `∏` and `∑`.
We will have to make a choice.
Online discussions, such as https://math.stackexchange.com/q/185538/30839
seem to suggest that `∏` and `∑` should have the same precedence,
and that this should be somewhere between `*` and `+`.
The latter have precedence levels `70` and `65` respectively,
and we therefore choose the level `67`.
In practice, this means that parentheses should be placed as follows:
```lean
∑ k ∈ K, (a k + b k) = ∑ k ∈ K, a k + ∑ k ∈ K, b k →
∏ k ∈ K, a k * b k = (∏ k ∈ K, a k) * (∏ k ∈ K, b k)
```
(Example taken from page 490 of Knuth's *Concrete Mathematics*.)
-/
namespace BigOperators
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder Lean Meta
-- TODO: contribute this modification back to `extBinder`
/-- A `bigOpBinder` is like an `extBinder` and has the form `x`, `x : ty`, or `x pred`
where `pred` is a `binderPred` like `< 2`.
Unlike `extBinder`, `x` is a term. -/
syntax bigOpBinder := term:max ((" : " term) <|> binderPred)?
/-- A BigOperator binder in parentheses -/
syntax bigOpBinderParenthesized := " (" bigOpBinder ")"
/-- A list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinderCollection := bigOpBinderParenthesized+
/-- A single (unparenthesized) binder, or a list of parenthesized binders -/
syntax bigOpBinders := bigOpBinderCollection <|> (ppSpace bigOpBinder)
/-- Collects additional binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinder`.
Note: this is not extensible at the moment, unlike the usual `bigOpBinder` expansions. -/
def processBigOpBinder (processed : (Array (Term × Term)))
(binder : TSyntax ``bigOpBinder) : MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
set_option hygiene false in
withRef binder do
match binder with
| `(bigOpBinder| $x:term) =>
match x with
| `(($a + $b = $n)) => -- Maybe this is too cute.
return processed |>.push (← `(⟨$a, $b⟩), ← `(Finset.Nat.antidiagonal $n))
| _ => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``(Finset.univ))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x : $t) => return processed |>.push (x, ← ``((Finset.univ : Finset $t)))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ∈ $s) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(finset% $s))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x < $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iio $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≤ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Iic $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x > $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ioi $n))
| `(bigOpBinder| $x ≥ $n) => return processed |>.push (x, ← `(Finset.Ici $n))
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collects the binder/Finset pairs for the given `bigOpBinders`. -/
def processBigOpBinders (binders : TSyntax ``bigOpBinders) :
MacroM (Array (Term × Term)) :=
match binders with
| `(bigOpBinders| $b:bigOpBinder) => processBigOpBinder #[] b
| `(bigOpBinders| $[($bs:bigOpBinder)]*) => bs.foldlM processBigOpBinder #[]
| _ => Macro.throwUnsupported
/-- Collect the binderIdents into a `⟨...⟩` expression. -/
def bigOpBindersPattern (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
let ts := processed.map Prod.fst
if ts.size == 1 then
return ts[0]!
else
`(⟨$ts,*⟩)
/-- Collect the terms into a product of sets. -/
def bigOpBindersProd (processed : (Array (Term × Term))) :
MacroM Term := do
if processed.isEmpty then
`((Finset.univ : Finset Unit))
else if processed.size == 1 then
return processed[0]!.2
else
processed.foldrM (fun s p => `(SProd.sprod $(s.2) $p)) processed.back.2
(start := processed.size - 1)
/--
- `∑ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum Finset.univ f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∑ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∑ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∑ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.sum (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∑ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∑" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigsum) "∑ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
/--
- `∏ x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod Finset.univ f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite domain of `f`.
- `∏ x ∈ s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s` (either a `Finset` or a `Set` with a `Fintype` instance).
- `∏ x ∈ s with p x, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod (Finset.filter p s) f`.
- `∏ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ t), f x y` is notation for `Finset.prod (s ×ˢ t) (fun ⟨x, y⟩ ↦ f x y)`.
These support destructuring, for example `∏ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x y`.
Notation: `"∏" bigOpBinders* ("with" term)? "," term` -/
syntax (name := bigprod) "∏ " bigOpBinders ("with " term)? ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsum)
| `(∑ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.sum (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.sum $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
macro_rules (kind := bigprod)
| `(∏ $bs:bigOpBinders $[with $p?]?, $v) => do
let processed ← processBigOpBinders bs
let x ← bigOpBindersPattern processed
let s ← bigOpBindersProd processed
match p? with
| some p => `(Finset.prod (Finset.filter (fun $x ↦ $p) $s) (fun $x ↦ $v))
| none => `(Finset.prod $s (fun $x ↦ $v))
/-- (Deprecated, use `∑ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∑ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.sum s f`. It is the sum of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigsumin) "∑ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigsumin)
| `(∑ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∑ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∑ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
/-- (Deprecated, use `∏ x ∈ s, f x`)
`∏ x in s, f x` is notation for `Finset.prod s f`. It is the product of `f x`,
where `x` ranges over the finite set `s`. -/
syntax (name := bigprodin) "∏ " extBinder " in " term ", " term:67 : term
macro_rules (kind := bigprodin)
| `(∏ $x:ident in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ $s, $r)
| `(∏ $x:ident : $t in $s, $r) => `(∏ $x:ident ∈ ($s : Finset $t), $r)
open Lean Meta Parser.Term PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.prod`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the product is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.prod] def delabFinsetProd : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∏ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∏ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
/-- Delaborator for `Finset.sum`. The `pp.piBinderTypes` option controls whether
to show the domain type when the sum is over `Finset.univ`. -/
@[delab app.Finset.sum] def delabFinsetSum : Delab :=
whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 5 <| do
let #[_, _, _, s, f] := (← getExpr).getAppArgs | failure
guard <| f.isLambda
let ppDomain ← getPPOption getPPPiBinderTypes
let (i, body) ← withAppArg <| withBindingBodyUnusedName fun i => do
return (i, ← delab)
if s.isAppOfArity ``Finset.univ 2 then
let binder ←
if ppDomain then
let ty ← withNaryArg 0 delab
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident : $ty)
else
`(bigOpBinder| $(.mk i):ident)
`(∑ $binder:bigOpBinder, $body)
else
let ss ← withNaryArg 3 <| delab
`(∑ $(.mk i):ident ∈ $ss, $body)
end BigOperators
namespace Finset
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_multiset_prod [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = (s.1.map f).prod :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod
#align finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_map_val [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.1.map f).prod = ∏ a ∈ s, f a :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_map_val Finset.prod_map_val
#align finset.sum_map_val Finset.sum_map_val
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_fold [CommMonoid β] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = s.fold ((· * ·) : β → β → β) 1 f :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_eq_fold Finset.prod_eq_fold
#align finset.sum_eq_fold Finset.sum_eq_fold
@[simp]
theorem sum_multiset_singleton (s : Finset α) : (s.sum fun x => {x}) = s.val := by
simp only [sum_eq_multiset_sum, Multiset.sum_map_singleton]
#align finset.sum_multiset_singleton Finset.sum_multiset_singleton
end Finset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_prod [CommMonoid β] [CommMonoid γ] {G : Type*} [FunLike G β γ] [MonoidHomClass G β γ]
(g : G) (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : g (∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g (f x) := by
simp only [Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod, map_multiset_prod, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align map_prod map_prod
#align map_sum map_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α) :
⇑(∏ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, ⇑(f x) :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.coeFn β γ) _ _
#align monoid_hom.coe_finset_prod MonoidHom.coe_finset_prod
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_finset_sum AddMonoidHom.coe_finset_sum
/-- See also `Finset.prod_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"See also `Finset.sum_apply`, with the same conclusion but with the weaker hypothesis
`f : α → β → γ`"]
theorem MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply [MulOneClass β] [CommMonoid γ] (f : α → β →* γ) (s : Finset α)
(b : β) : (∏ x ∈ s, f x) b = ∏ x ∈ s, f x b :=
map_prod (MonoidHom.eval b) _ _
#align monoid_hom.finset_prod_apply MonoidHom.finset_prod_apply
#align add_monoid_hom.finset_sum_apply AddMonoidHom.finset_sum_apply
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} {f g : α → β}
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_empty : ∏ x ∈ ∅, f x = 1 :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_empty Finset.prod_empty
#align finset.sum_empty Finset.sum_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_of_empty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : ∏ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_of_empty Finset.prod_of_empty
#align finset.sum_of_empty Finset.sum_of_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_cons (h : a ∉ s) : ∏ x ∈ cons a s h, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_cons h
#align finset.prod_cons Finset.prod_cons
#align finset.sum_cons Finset.sum_cons
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_insert [DecidableEq α] : a ∉ s → ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = f a * ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
fold_insert
#align finset.prod_insert Finset.prod_insert
#align finset.sum_insert Finset.sum_insert
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `a` is in `s` or `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem [DecidableEq α] (h : a ∉ s → f a = 1) :
∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
by_cases hm : a ∈ s
· simp_rw [insert_eq_of_mem hm]
· rw [prod_insert hm, h hm, one_mul]
#align finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem Finset.prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem
#align finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem
/-- The product of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the product over `s`, as long as `f a = 1`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "The sum of `f` over `insert a s` is the same as
the sum over `s`, as long as `f a = 0`."]
theorem prod_insert_one [DecidableEq α] (h : f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_insert_of_eq_one_if_not_mem fun _ => h
#align finset.prod_insert_one Finset.prod_insert_one
#align finset.sum_insert_zero Finset.sum_insert_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_insert_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) {f : α → M} :
(∏ x ∈ insert a s, f x) / f a = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp [ha]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_singleton (f : α → β) (a : α) : ∏ x ∈ singleton a, f x = f a :=
Eq.trans fold_singleton <| mul_one _
#align finset.prod_singleton Finset.prod_singleton
#align finset.sum_singleton Finset.sum_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pair [DecidableEq α] {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) :
(∏ x ∈ ({a, b} : Finset α), f x) = f a * f b := by
rw [prod_insert (not_mem_singleton.2 h), prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_pair Finset.prod_pair
#align finset.sum_pair Finset.sum_pair
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const_one : (∏ _x ∈ s, (1 : β)) = 1 := by
simp only [Finset.prod, Multiset.map_const', Multiset.prod_replicate, one_pow]
#align finset.prod_const_one Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.sum_const_zero Finset.sum_const_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_image [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} :
(∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, g x = g y → x = y) → ∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (g x) :=
fold_image
#align finset.prod_image Finset.prod_image
#align finset.sum_image Finset.sum_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_map (s : Finset α) (e : α ↪ γ) (f : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.map e, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f (e x) := by
rw [Finset.prod, Finset.map_val, Multiset.map_map]; rfl
#align finset.prod_map Finset.prod_map
#align finset.sum_map Finset.sum_map
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_attach (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s.attach, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
classical rw [← prod_image Subtype.coe_injective.injOn, attach_image_val]
#align finset.prod_attach Finset.prod_attach
#align finset.sum_attach Finset.sum_attach
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem prod_congr (h : s₁ = s₂) : (∀ x ∈ s₂, f x = g x) → s₁.prod f = s₂.prod g := by
rw [h]; exact fold_congr
#align finset.prod_congr Finset.prod_congr
#align finset.sum_congr Finset.sum_congr
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_one {f : α → β} {s : Finset α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ _x ∈ s, 1 := Finset.prod_congr rfl h
_ = 1 := Finset.prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_one Finset.prod_eq_one
#align finset.sum_eq_zero Finset.sum_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjUnion (h) :
∏ x ∈ s₁.disjUnion s₂ h, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjUnion h)
rw [one_mul]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_union Finset.prod_disjUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_union Finset.sum_disjUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_disjiUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Finset α) (h) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjiUnion t h, f x = ∏ i ∈ s, ∏ x ∈ t i, f x := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (fold_disjiUnion h)
dsimp [Finset.prod, Multiset.prod, Multiset.fold, Finset.disjUnion, Finset.fold]
congr
exact prod_const_one.symm
#align finset.prod_disj_Union Finset.prod_disjiUnion
#align finset.sum_disj_Union Finset.sum_disjiUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union_inter [DecidableEq α] :
(∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
fold_union_inter
#align finset.prod_union_inter Finset.prod_union_inter
#align finset.sum_union_inter Finset.sum_union_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_union [DecidableEq α] (h : Disjoint s₁ s₂) :
∏ x ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f x = (∏ x ∈ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union_inter, disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp h]; exact (mul_one _).symm
#align finset.prod_union Finset.prod_union
#align finset.sum_union Finset.sum_union
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
(s : Finset α) (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] [∀ x, Decidable (¬p x)] (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
have := Classical.decEq α
rw [← prod_union (disjoint_filter_filter_neg s s p), filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
#align finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not Finset.prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not
#align finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not Finset.sum_filter_add_sum_filter_not
section ToList
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_to_list (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) : (s.toList.map f).prod = s.prod f := by
rw [Finset.prod, ← Multiset.prod_coe, ← Multiset.map_coe, Finset.coe_toList]
#align finset.prod_to_list Finset.prod_to_list
#align finset.sum_to_list Finset.sum_to_list
end ToList
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (prod_map s σ.toEmbedding f).symm
exact (map_perm hs).symm
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp Equiv.Perm.prod_comp
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp Equiv.Perm.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Equiv.Perm.prod_comp' (σ : Equiv.Perm α) (s : Finset α) (f : α → α → β)
(hs : { a | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : (∏ x ∈ s, f (σ x) x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x (σ.symm x) := by
convert σ.prod_comp s (fun x => f x (σ.symm x)) hs
rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align equiv.perm.prod_comp' Equiv.Perm.prod_comp'
#align equiv.perm.sum_comp' Equiv.Perm.sum_comp'
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_insert [DecidableEq α] (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (insert a s).powerset, f t =
(∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) * ∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f (insert a t) := by
rw [powerset_insert, prod_union, prod_image]
· exact insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn.mono fun t ht ↦ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 ht) ha
· aesop (add simp [disjoint_left, insert_subset_iff])
#align finset.prod_powerset_insert Finset.prod_powerset_insert
#align finset.sum_powerset_insert Finset.sum_powerset_insert
/-- A product over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by multiplying the product over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over all subsets of `s ∪ {x}` is obtained by summing the sum over all subsets
of `s`, and over all subsets of `s` to which one adds `x`."]
lemma prod_powerset_cons (ha : a ∉ s) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ (s.cons a ha).powerset, f t = (∏ t ∈ s.powerset, f t) *
∏ t ∈ s.powerset.attach, f (cons a t $ not_mem_mono (mem_powerset.1 t.2) ha) := by
classical
simp_rw [cons_eq_insert]
rw [prod_powerset_insert ha, prod_attach _ fun t ↦ f (insert a t)]
/-- A product over `powerset s` is equal to the double product over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum over `powerset s` is equal to the double sum over sets of subsets of `s` with
`card s = k`, for `k = 1, ..., card s`"]
lemma prod_powerset (s : Finset α) (f : Finset α → β) :
∏ t ∈ powerset s, f t = ∏ j ∈ range (card s + 1), ∏ t ∈ powersetCard j s, f t := by
rw [powerset_card_disjiUnion, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_powerset Finset.prod_powerset
#align finset.sum_powerset Finset.sum_powerset
end CommMonoid
end Finset
section
open Finset
variable [Fintype α] [CommMonoid β]
@[to_additive]
theorem IsCompl.prod_mul_prod {s t : Finset α} (h : IsCompl s t) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ t, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(Finset.prod_disjUnion h.disjoint).symm.trans <| by
classical rw [Finset.disjUnion_eq_union, ← Finset.sup_eq_union, h.sup_eq_top]; rfl
#align is_compl.prod_mul_prod IsCompl.prod_mul_prod
#align is_compl.sum_add_sum IsCompl.sum_add_sum
end
namespace Finset
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid β]
/-- Multiplying the products of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole product.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.prod_subtype_mul_prod_subtype`. -/
@[to_additive "Adding the sums of a function over `s` and over `sᶜ` gives the whole sum.
For a version expressed with subtypes, see `Fintype.sum_subtype_add_sum_subtype`. "]
theorem prod_mul_prod_compl [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
IsCompl.prod_mul_prod isCompl_compl f
#align finset.prod_mul_prod_compl Finset.prod_mul_prod_compl
#align finset.sum_add_sum_compl Finset.sum_add_sum_compl
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_compl_mul_prod [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ i ∈ sᶜ, f i) * ∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
(@isCompl_compl _ s _).symm.prod_mul_prod f
#align finset.prod_compl_mul_prod Finset.prod_compl_mul_prod
#align finset.sum_compl_add_sum Finset.sum_compl_add_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
(∏ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x := by
rw [← prod_union sdiff_disjoint, sdiff_union_of_subset h]
#align finset.prod_sdiff Finset.prod_sdiff
#align finset.sum_sdiff Finset.sum_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset_one_on_sdiff [DecidableEq α] (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s₂ \ s₁, g x = 1)
(hfg : ∀ x ∈ s₁, f x = g x) : ∏ i ∈ s₁, f i = ∏ i ∈ s₂, g i := by
rw [← prod_sdiff h, prod_eq_one hg, one_mul]
exact prod_congr rfl hfg
#align finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
#align finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff Finset.sum_subset_zero_on_sdiff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subset (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ → f x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s₁, f x = ∏ x ∈ s₂, f x :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
prod_subset_one_on_sdiff h (by simpa) fun _ _ => rfl
#align finset.prod_subset Finset.prod_subset
#align finset.sum_subset Finset.sum_subset
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_disj_sum (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : Sum α γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, f x = (∏ x ∈ s, f (Sum.inl x)) * ∏ x ∈ t, f (Sum.inr x) := by
rw [← map_inl_disjUnion_map_inr, prod_disjUnion, prod_map, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_disj_sum Finset.prod_disj_sum
#align finset.sum_disj_sum Finset.sum_disj_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sum_elim (s : Finset α) (t : Finset γ) (f : α → β) (g : γ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.disjSum t, Sum.elim f g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by simp
#align finset.prod_sum_elim Finset.prod_sum_elim
#align finset.sum_sum_elim Finset.sum_sum_elim
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_biUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α}
(hs : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) : ∏ x ∈ s.biUnion t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ i ∈ t x, f i := by
rw [← disjiUnion_eq_biUnion _ _ hs, prod_disjiUnion]
#align finset.prod_bUnion Finset.prod_biUnion
#align finset.sum_bUnion Finset.sum_biUnion
/-- Product over a sigma type equals the product of fiberwise products. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.prod_sigma'`. -/
@[to_additive "Sum over a sigma type equals the sum of fiberwise sums. For rewriting
in the reverse direction, use `Finset.sum_sigma'`"]
theorem prod_sigma {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : Sigma σ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x = ∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f ⟨a, s⟩ := by
simp_rw [← disjiUnion_map_sigma_mk, prod_disjiUnion, prod_map, Function.Embedding.sigmaMk_apply]
#align finset.prod_sigma Finset.prod_sigma
#align finset.sum_sigma Finset.sum_sigma
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_sigma' {σ : α → Type*} (s : Finset α) (t : ∀ a, Finset (σ a)) (f : ∀ a, σ a → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, ∏ s ∈ t a, f a s) = ∏ x ∈ s.sigma t, f x.1 x.2 :=
Eq.symm <| prod_sigma s t fun x => f x.1 x.2
#align finset.prod_sigma' Finset.prod_sigma'
#align finset.sum_sigma' Finset.sum_sigma'
section bij
variable {ι κ α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {s : Finset ι} {t : Finset κ} {f : ι → α} {g : κ → α}
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the product, rather than being a non-dependent function. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is allowed to use membership of the
domain of the sum, rather than being a non-dependent function."]
theorem prod_bij (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂, i a₁ ha₁ = i a₂ ha₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, ∃ a ha, i a ha = b) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
congr_arg Multiset.prod (Multiset.map_eq_map_of_bij_of_nodup f g s.2 t.2 i hi i_inj i_surj h)
#align finset.prod_bij Finset.prod_bij
#align finset.sum_bij Finset.sum_bij
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the products, rather than being non-dependent functions. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather than
as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are allowed to use
membership of the domains of the sums, rather than being non-dependent functions."]
theorem prod_bij' (i : ∀ a ∈ s, κ) (j : ∀ a ∈ t, ι) (hi : ∀ a ha, i a ha ∈ t)
(hj : ∀ a ha, j a ha ∈ s) (left_inv : ∀ a ha, j (i a ha) (hi a ha) = a)
(right_inv : ∀ a ha, i (j a ha) (hj a ha) = a) (h : ∀ a ha, f a = g (i a ha)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
refine prod_bij i hi (fun a1 h1 a2 h2 eq ↦ ?_) (fun b hb ↦ ⟨_, hj b hb, right_inv b hb⟩) h
rw [← left_inv a1 h1, ← left_inv a2 h2]
simp only [eq]
#align finset.prod_bij' Finset.prod_bij'
#align finset.sum_bij' Finset.sum_bij'
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective
injection, rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij'` is that the bijection is specified as a surjective injection,
rather than by an inverse function.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij` is that the bijection is a non-dependent function, rather than
being allowed to use membership of the domain of the sum."]
lemma prod_nbij (i : ι → κ) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (i_inj : (s : Set ι).InjOn i)
(i_surj : (s : Set ι).SurjOn i t) (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a _ ↦ i a) hi i_inj (by simpa using i_surj) h
/-- Reorder a product.
The difference with `Finset.prod_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.prod_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the products.
The difference with `Finset.prod_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the products, rather than on the entire types.
-/
@[to_additive "Reorder a sum.
The difference with `Finset.sum_nbij` is that the bijection is specified with an inverse, rather
than as a surjective injection.
The difference with `Finset.sum_bij'` is that the bijection and its inverse are non-dependent
functions, rather than being allowed to use membership of the domains of the sums.
The difference with `Finset.sum_equiv` is that bijectivity is only required to hold on the domains
of the sums, rather than on the entire types."]
lemma prod_nbij' (i : ι → κ) (j : κ → ι) (hi : ∀ a ∈ s, i a ∈ t) (hj : ∀ a ∈ t, j a ∈ s)
(left_inv : ∀ a ∈ s, j (i a) = a) (right_inv : ∀ a ∈ t, i (j a) = a)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g (i a)) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x :=
prod_bij' (fun a _ ↦ i a) (fun b _ ↦ j b) hi hj left_inv right_inv h
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_nbij'` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_equiv` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_equiv (e : ι ≃ κ) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := by refine prod_nbij' e e.symm ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hfg <;> simp [hst]
#align finset.equiv.prod_comp_finset Finset.prod_equiv
#align finset.equiv.sum_comp_finset Finset.sum_equiv
/-- Specialization of `Finset.prod_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.prod_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`. -/
@[to_additive "`Specialization of `Finset.sum_bij` that automatically fills in most arguments.
See `Fintype.sum_bijective` for the version where `s` and `t` are `univ`."]
lemma prod_bijective (e : ι → κ) (he : e.Bijective) (hst : ∀ i, i ∈ s ↔ e i ∈ t)
(hfg : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, g i := prod_equiv (.ofBijective e he) hst hfg
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_of_injOn (e : ι → κ) (he : Set.InjOn e s) (hest : Set.MapsTo e s t)
(h' : ∀ i ∈ t, i ∉ e '' s → g i = 1) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, f i = g (e i)) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ j ∈ t, g j := by
classical
exact (prod_nbij e (fun a ↦ mem_image_of_mem e) he (by simp [Set.surjOn_image]) h).trans <|
prod_subset (image_subset_iff.2 hest) <| by simpa using h'
variable [DecidableEq κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter' (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f (g i) :=
prod_congr rfl fun j _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hi).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_eq_prod_filter _ _ _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [← prod_disjiUnion, disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h]
#align finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to
#align finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to Finset.sum_fiberwise_of_maps_to
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' {g : ι → κ} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, g i ∈ t) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j ∈ t, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x ↦ g x = y, f (g x) :=
prod_congr rfl fun y _ ↦ prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ by rw [(mem_filter.1 hx).2]
_ = _ := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to h _
variable [Fintype κ]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : ι → α) :
∏ j, ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
#align finset.prod_fiberwise Finset.prod_fiberwise
#align finset.sum_fiberwise Finset.sum_fiberwise
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_fiberwise' (s : Finset ι) (g : ι → κ) (f : κ → α) :
∏ j, ∏ _i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i = j, f j = ∏ i ∈ s, f (g i) :=
prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' (fun _ _ ↦ mem_univ _) _
end bij
/-- Taking a product over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the product over `Fintype.piFinset t`.
`univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`, but differ
in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`. -/
@[to_additive "Taking a sum over `univ.pi t` is the same as taking the sum over
`Fintype.piFinset t`. `univ.pi t` and `Fintype.piFinset t` are essentially the same `Finset`,
but differ in the type of their element, `univ.pi t` is a `Finset (Π a ∈ univ, t a)` and
`Fintype.piFinset t` is a `Finset (Π a, t a)`."]
lemma prod_univ_pi [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {κ : ι → Type*} (t : ∀ i, Finset (κ i))
(f : (∀ i ∈ (univ : Finset ι), κ i) → β) :
∏ x ∈ univ.pi t, f x = ∏ x ∈ Fintype.piFinset t, f fun a _ ↦ x a := by
apply prod_nbij' (fun x i ↦ x i $ mem_univ _) (fun x i _ ↦ x i) <;> simp
#align finset.prod_univ_pi Finset.prod_univ_pi
#align finset.sum_univ_pi Finset.sum_univ_pi
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma prod_diag [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α × α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s.diag, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f (i, i) := by
apply prod_nbij' Prod.fst (fun i ↦ (i, i)) <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (c, a) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.1, p.2))
apply prod_equiv (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product Finset.prod_finset_product
#align finset.sum_finset_product Finset.sum_finset_product
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product' (r : Finset (γ × α)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : γ × α, p ∈ r ↔ p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ∈ t p.1) {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f c a :=
prod_finset_product r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product' Finset.prod_finset_product'
#align finset.sum_finset_product' Finset.sum_finset_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α × γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f (a, c) := by
refine Eq.trans ?_ (prod_sigma s t fun p => f (p.2, p.1))
apply prod_equiv ((Equiv.prodComm _ _).trans (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _).symm) <;> simp [h]
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right Finset.prod_finset_product_right
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right Finset.sum_finset_product_right
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_product_right' (r : Finset (α × γ)) (s : Finset γ) (t : γ → Finset α)
(h : ∀ p : α × γ, p ∈ r ↔ p.2 ∈ s ∧ p.1 ∈ t p.2) {f : α → γ → β} :
∏ p ∈ r, f p.1 p.2 = ∏ c ∈ s, ∏ a ∈ t c, f a c :=
prod_finset_product_right r s t h
#align finset.prod_finset_product_right' Finset.prod_finset_product_right'
#align finset.sum_finset_product_right' Finset.sum_finset_product_right'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_image' [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset γ} {g : γ → α} (h : γ → β)
(eq : ∀ c ∈ s, f (g c) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = g c, h x) :
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, h x :=
calc
∏ x ∈ s.image g, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.image g, ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun c' => g c' = x, h x :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _x hx =>
let ⟨c, hcs, hc⟩ := mem_image.1 hx
hc ▸ eq c hcs
_ = ∏ x ∈ s, h x := prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to (fun _x => mem_image_of_mem g) _
#align finset.prod_image' Finset.prod_image'
#align finset.sum_image' Finset.sum_image'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mul_distrib : ∏ x ∈ s, f x * g x = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
Eq.trans (by rw [one_mul]; rfl) fold_op_distrib
#align finset.prod_mul_distrib Finset.prod_mul_distrib
#align finset.sum_add_distrib Finset.sum_add_distrib
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mul_prod_comm (f g h i : α → β) :
(∏ a ∈ s, f a * g a) * ∏ a ∈ s, h a * i a = (∏ a ∈ s, f a * h a) * ∏ a ∈ s, g a * i a := by
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_mul_mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product (s ×ˢ t) s (fun _a => t) fun _p => mem_product
#align finset.prod_product Finset.prod_product
#align finset.sum_product Finset.sum_product
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product`"]
theorem prod_product' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y :=
prod_product
#align finset.prod_product' Finset.prod_product'
#align finset.sum_product' Finset.sum_product'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_product_right {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ × α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f (x, y) :=
prod_finset_product_right (s ×ˢ t) t (fun _a => s) fun _p => mem_product.trans and_comm
#align finset.prod_product_right Finset.prod_product_right
#align finset.sum_product_right Finset.sum_product_right
/-- An uncurried version of `Finset.prod_product_right`. -/
@[to_additive "An uncurried version of `Finset.sum_product_right`"]
theorem prod_product_right' {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
∏ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, f x.1 x.2 = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_product_right
#align finset.prod_product_right' Finset.prod_product_right'
#align finset.sum_product_right' Finset.sum_product_right'
/-- Generalization of `Finset.prod_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on the outer
variable. -/
@[to_additive "Generalization of `Finset.sum_comm` to the case when the inner `Finset`s depend on
the outer variable."]
theorem prod_comm' {s : Finset γ} {t : γ → Finset α} {t' : Finset α} {s' : α → Finset γ}
(h : ∀ x y, x ∈ s ∧ y ∈ t x ↔ x ∈ s' y ∧ y ∈ t') {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t x, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t', ∏ x ∈ s' y, f x y := by
classical
have : ∀ z : γ × α, (z ∈ s.biUnion fun x => (t x).map <| Function.Embedding.sectr x _) ↔
z.1 ∈ s ∧ z.2 ∈ t z.1 := by
rintro ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_map, Function.Embedding.sectr_apply, Prod.mk.injEq,
exists_eq_right, ← and_assoc]
exact
(prod_finset_product' _ _ _ this).symm.trans
((prod_finset_product_right' _ _ _) fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (this _).trans ((h x y).trans and_comm))
#align finset.prod_comm' Finset.prod_comm'
#align finset.sum_comm' Finset.sum_comm'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_comm {s : Finset γ} {t : Finset α} {f : γ → α → β} :
(∏ x ∈ s, ∏ y ∈ t, f x y) = ∏ y ∈ t, ∏ x ∈ s, f x y :=
prod_comm' fun _ _ => Iff.rfl
#align finset.prod_comm Finset.prod_comm
#align finset.sum_comm Finset.sum_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_hom_rel [CommMonoid γ] {r : β → γ → Prop} {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {s : Finset α}
(h₁ : r 1 1) (h₂ : ∀ a b c, r b c → r (f a * b) (g a * c)) :
r (∏ x ∈ s, f x) (∏ x ∈ s, g x) := by
delta Finset.prod
apply Multiset.prod_hom_rel <;> assumption
#align finset.prod_hom_rel Finset.prod_hom_rel
#align finset.sum_hom_rel Finset.sum_hom_rel
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_of_ne {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (hp : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 → p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
(prod_subset (filter_subset _ _)) fun x => by
classical
rw [not_imp_comm, mem_filter]
exact fun h₁ h₂ => ⟨h₁, by simpa using hp _ h₁ h₂⟩
#align finset.prod_filter_of_ne Finset.prod_filter_of_ne
#align finset.sum_filter_of_ne Finset.sum_filter_of_ne
-- If we use `[DecidableEq β]` here, some rewrites fail because they find a wrong `Decidable`
-- instance first; `{∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)}` doesn't work with `rw ← prod_filter_ne_one`
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter_ne_one (s : Finset α) [∀ x, Decidable (f x ≠ 1)] :
∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
prod_filter_of_ne fun _ _ => id
#align finset.prod_filter_ne_one Finset.prod_filter_ne_one
#align finset.sum_filter_ne_zero Finset.sum_filter_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_filter (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (f : α → β) :
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 :=
calc
∏ a ∈ s.filter p, f a = ∏ a ∈ s.filter p, if p a then f a else 1 :=
prod_congr rfl fun a h => by rw [if_pos]; simpa using (mem_filter.1 h).2
_ = ∏ a ∈ s, if p a then f a else 1 := by
{ refine prod_subset (filter_subset _ s) fun x hs h => ?_
rw [mem_filter, not_and] at h
exact if_neg (by simpa using h hs) }
#align finset.prod_filter Finset.prod_filter
#align finset.sum_filter Finset.sum_filter
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h : a ∈ s)
(h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ {a}, f x := by
{ refine (prod_subset ?_ ?_).symm
· intro _ H
rwa [mem_singleton.1 H]
· simpa only [mem_singleton] }
_ = f a := prod_singleton _ _
#align finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_single_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_single {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a : α) (h₀ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≠ a → f b = 1)
(h₁ : a ∉ s → f a = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
by_cases (prod_eq_single_of_mem a · h₀) fun this =>
(prod_congr rfl fun b hb => h₀ b hb <| by rintro rfl; exact this hb).trans <|
prod_const_one.trans (h₁ this).symm
#align finset.prod_eq_single Finset.prod_eq_single
#align finset.sum_eq_single Finset.sum_eq_single
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_left [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₂, a ∉ s₁ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₁, f a :=
Eq.symm <|
prod_subset subset_union_left fun _a ha ha' ↦ hs _ ((mem_union.1 ha).resolve_left ha') ha'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_union_eq_right [DecidableEq α] (hs : ∀ a ∈ s₁, a ∉ s₂ → f a = 1) :
∏ a ∈ s₁ ∪ s₂, f a = ∏ a ∈ s₂, f a := by rw [union_comm, prod_union_eq_left hs]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_of_mem {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s)
(hn : a ≠ b) (h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; let s' := ({a, b} : Finset α)
have hu : s' ⊆ s := by
refine insert_subset_iff.mpr ?_
apply And.intro ha
apply singleton_subset_iff.mpr hb
have hf : ∀ c ∈ s, c ∉ s' → f c = 1 := by
intro c hc hcs
apply h₀ c hc
apply not_or.mp
intro hab
apply hcs
rw [mem_insert, mem_singleton]
exact hab
rw [← prod_subset hu hf]
exact Finset.prod_pair hn
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem Finset.prod_eq_mul_of_mem
#align finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem Finset.sum_eq_add_of_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} (a b : α) (hn : a ≠ b)
(h₀ : ∀ c ∈ s, c ≠ a ∧ c ≠ b → f c = 1) (ha : a ∉ s → f a = 1) (hb : b ∉ s → f b = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = f a * f b := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; by_cases h₁ : a ∈ s <;> by_cases h₂ : b ∈ s
· exact prod_eq_mul_of_mem a b h₁ h₂ hn h₀
· rw [hb h₂, mul_one]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem a h₁
exact fun c hc hca => h₀ c hc ⟨hca, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩
· rw [ha h₁, one_mul]
apply prod_eq_single_of_mem b h₂
exact fun c hc hcb => h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, hcb⟩
· rw [ha h₁, hb h₂, mul_one]
exact
_root_.trans
(prod_congr rfl fun c hc =>
h₀ c hc ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₁, ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc h₂⟩)
prod_const_one
#align finset.prod_eq_mul Finset.prod_eq_mul
#align finset.sum_eq_add Finset.sum_eq_add
-- Porting note: simpNF linter complains that LHS doesn't simplify, but it does
/-- A product over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)
"A sum over `s.subtype p` equals one over `s.filter p`."]
theorem prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x := by
conv_lhs => erw [← prod_map (s.subtype p) (Function.Embedding.subtype _) f]
exact prod_congr (subtype_map _) fun x _hx => rfl
#align finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter
/-- If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a product
over `s.subtype p` equals that product over `s`. -/
@[to_additive "If all elements of a `Finset` satisfy the predicate `p`, a sum
over `s.subtype p` equals that sum over `s`."]
theorem prod_subtype_of_mem (f : α → β) {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s.subtype p, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [prod_subtype_eq_prod_filter, filter_true_of_mem]
simpa using h
#align finset.prod_subtype_of_mem Finset.prod_subtype_of_mem
#align finset.sum_subtype_of_mem Finset.sum_subtype_of_mem
/-- A product of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
product in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`. -/
@[to_additive "A sum of a function over a `Finset` in a subtype equals a
sum in the main type of a function that agrees with the first
function on that `Finset`."]
theorem prod_subtype_map_embedding {p : α → Prop} {s : Finset { x // p x }} {f : { x // p x } → β}
{g : α → β} (h : ∀ x : { x // p x }, x ∈ s → g x = f x) :
(∏ x ∈ s.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [Finset.prod_map]
exact Finset.prod_congr rfl h
#align finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding Finset.prod_subtype_map_embedding
#align finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding Finset.sum_subtype_map_embedding
variable (f s)
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort_eq_attach (f : s → β) : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.attach, f i :=
rfl
#align finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.prod_coe_sort_eq_attach
#align finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach Finset.sum_coe_sort_eq_attach
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_coe_sort : ∏ i : s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := prod_attach _ _
#align finset.prod_coe_sort Finset.prod_coe_sort
#align finset.sum_coe_sort Finset.sum_coe_sort
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_finset_coe (f : α → β) (s : Finset α) : (∏ i : (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_coe_sort s f
#align finset.prod_finset_coe Finset.prod_finset_coe
#align finset.sum_finset_coe Finset.sum_finset_coe
variable {f s}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_subtype {p : α → Prop} {F : Fintype (Subtype p)} (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ p x)
(f : α → β) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a : Subtype p, f a := by
have : (· ∈ s) = p := Set.ext h
subst p
rw [← prod_coe_sort]
congr!
#align finset.prod_subtype Finset.prod_subtype
#align finset.sum_subtype Finset.sum_subtype
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage' (f : ι → κ) [DecidablePred (· ∈ Set.range f)] (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s.filter (· ∈ Set.range f), g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ preimage s f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ image f (preimage s f hf), g x :=
Eq.symm <| prod_image <| by simpa only [mem_preimage, Set.InjOn] using hf
_ = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => x ∈ Set.range f, g x := by rw [image_preimage]
#align finset.prod_preimage' Finset.prod_preimage'
#align finset.sum_preimage' Finset.sum_preimage'
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf) (g : κ → β)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ s, x ∉ Set.range f → g x = 1) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
classical rw [prod_preimage', prod_filter_of_ne]; exact fun x hx ↦ Not.imp_symm (hg x hx)
#align finset.prod_preimage Finset.prod_preimage
#align finset.sum_preimage Finset.sum_preimage
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_preimage_of_bij (f : ι → κ) (s : Finset κ) (hf : Set.BijOn f (f ⁻¹' ↑s) ↑s) (g : κ → β) :
∏ x ∈ s.preimage f hf.injOn, g (f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x :=
prod_preimage _ _ hf.injOn g fun _ hs h_f ↦ (h_f <| hf.subset_range hs).elim
#align finset.prod_preimage_of_bij Finset.prod_preimage_of_bij
#align finset.sum_preimage_of_bij Finset.sum_preimage_of_bij
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_set_coe (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : (∏ i : s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
(Finset.prod_subtype s.toFinset (fun _ ↦ Set.mem_toFinset) f).symm
/-- The product of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the product of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 1` off `s`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of a function `g` defined only on a set `s` is equal to
the sum of a function `f` defined everywhere,
as long as `f` and `g` agree on `s`, and `f = 0` off `s`."]
theorem prod_congr_set {α : Type*} [CommMonoid α] {β : Type*} [Fintype β] (s : Set β)
[DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (f : β → α) (g : s → α) (w : ∀ (x : β) (h : x ∈ s), f x = g ⟨x, h⟩)
(w' : ∀ x : β, x ∉ s → f x = 1) : Finset.univ.prod f = Finset.univ.prod g := by
rw [← @Finset.prod_subset _ _ s.toFinset Finset.univ f _ (by simp)]
· rw [Finset.prod_subtype]
· apply Finset.prod_congr rfl
exact fun ⟨x, h⟩ _ => w x h
· simp
· rintro x _ h
exact w' x (by simpa using h)
#align finset.prod_congr_set Finset.prod_congr_set
#align finset.sum_congr_set Finset.sum_congr_set
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p}
[DecidablePred fun x => ¬p x] (f : ∀ x : α, p x → γ) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → γ) (h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
calc
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx)) *
∏ x ∈ s.filter (¬p ·), h (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) :=
(prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s p _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (if hx : p x.1 then f x.1 hx else g x.1 hx) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ _).symm (prod_attach _ _).symm
_ = (∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, h (f x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter (¬p ·)).attach, h (g x.1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) :=
congr_arg₂ _ (prod_congr rfl fun x _hx ↦
congr_arg h (dif_pos <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
(prod_congr rfl fun x _hx => congr_arg h (dif_neg <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2))
#align finset.prod_apply_dite Finset.prod_apply_dite
#align finset.sum_apply_dite Finset.sum_apply_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {_hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ)
(h : γ → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, h (if p x then f x else g x)) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, h (f x)) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, h (g x) :=
(prod_apply_dite _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg₂ _ (prod_attach _ (h ∘ f)) (prod_attach _ (h ∘ g))
#align finset.prod_apply_ite Finset.prod_apply_ite
#align finset.sum_apply_ite Finset.sum_apply_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f : ∀ x : α, p x → β)
(g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) =
(∏ x ∈ (s.filter p).attach, f x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2)) *
∏ x ∈ (s.filter fun x => ¬p x).attach, g x.1 (by simpa using (mem_filter.mp x.2).2) := by
simp [prod_apply_dite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_dite Finset.prod_dite
#align finset.sum_dite Finset.sum_dite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite {s : Finset α} {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) =
(∏ x ∈ s.filter p, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => ¬p x, g x := by
simp [prod_apply_ite _ _ fun x => x]
#align finset.prod_ite Finset.prod_ite
#align finset.sum_ite Finset.sum_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
rw [prod_ite, filter_false_of_mem, filter_true_of_mem]
· simp only [prod_empty, one_mul]
all_goals intros; apply h; assumption
#align finset.prod_ite_of_false Finset.prod_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_ite_of_false Finset.sum_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → β) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p x then f x else g x) = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
simp_rw [← ite_not (p _)]
apply prod_ite_of_false
simpa
#align finset.prod_ite_of_true Finset.prod_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_ite_of_true Finset.sum_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (g x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_false _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_false
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_apply_ite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (f g : α → γ) (k : γ → β)
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x) : (∏ x ∈ s, k (if p x then f x else g x)) = ∏ x ∈ s, k (f x) := by
simp_rw [apply_ite k]
exact prod_ite_of_true _ _ h
#align finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true Finset.prod_apply_ite_of_true
#align finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true Finset.sum_apply_ite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_extend_by_one [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ s then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
(prod_congr rfl) fun _i hi => if_pos hi
#align finset.prod_extend_by_one Finset.prod_extend_by_one
#align finset.sum_extend_by_zero Finset.sum_extend_by_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_mem [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (if i ∈ t then f i else 1) = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← Finset.prod_filter, Finset.filter_mem_eq_inter]
#align finset.prod_ite_mem Finset.prod_ite_mem
#align finset.sum_ite_mem Finset.sum_ite_mem
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, a = x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : a = x then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h.symm
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq Finset.prod_dite_eq
#align finset.sum_dite_eq Finset.sum_dite_eq
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : ∀ x : α, x = a → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : x = a then b x h else 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a rfl) 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_single a, dif_pos rfl]
· intros _ _ h
rw [dif_neg]
exact h
· simp [h]
· rw [Finset.prod_eq_one]
intros
rw [dif_neg]
rintro rfl
contradiction
#align finset.prod_dite_eq' Finset.prod_dite_eq'
#align finset.sum_dite_eq' Finset.sum_dite_eq'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_eq [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (a = x) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq Finset.prod_ite_eq
#align finset.sum_ite_eq Finset.sum_ite_eq
/-- A product taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality test on the index and whose
alternative is `1` has value either the term at that index or `1`.
The difference with `Finset.prod_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped. -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp) "A sum taken over a conditional whose condition is an equality
test on the index and whose alternative is `0` has value either the term at that index or `0`.
The difference with `Finset.sum_ite_eq` is that the arguments to `Eq` are swapped."]
theorem prod_ite_eq' [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) (a : α) (b : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, ite (x = a) (b x) 1) = ite (a ∈ s) (b a) 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' s a fun x _ => b x
#align finset.prod_ite_eq' Finset.prod_ite_eq'
#align finset.sum_ite_eq' Finset.sum_ite_eq'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_ite_index (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ if p then s else t, f x = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ t, f x :=
apply_ite (fun s => ∏ x ∈ s, f x) _ _ _
#align finset.prod_ite_index Finset.prod_ite_index
#align finset.sum_ite_index Finset.sum_ite_index
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_ite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if p then f x else g x) = if p then ∏ x ∈ s, f x else ∏ x ∈ s, g x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_ite_irrel Finset.prod_ite_irrel
#align finset.sum_ite_irrel Finset.sum_ite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_dite_irrel (p : Prop) [Decidable p] (s : Finset α) (f : p → α → β) (g : ¬p → α → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if h : p then f h x else g h x) =
if h : p then ∏ x ∈ s, f h x else ∏ x ∈ s, g h x := by
split_ifs with h <;> rfl
#align finset.prod_dite_irrel Finset.prod_dite_irrel
#align finset.sum_dite_irrel Finset.sum_dite_irrel
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (x : β) (s : Finset α) :
∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a x a' = if a ∈ s then x else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq' _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single' Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle'
#align finset.sum_pi_single' Finset.sum_pi_single'
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_pi_mulSingle {β : α → Type*} [DecidableEq α] [∀ a, CommMonoid (β a)] (a : α)
(f : ∀ a, β a) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ a' ∈ s, Pi.mulSingle a' (f a') a) = if a ∈ s then f a else 1 :=
prod_dite_eq _ _ _
#align finset.prod_pi_mul_single Finset.prod_pi_mulSingle
@[to_additive]
lemma mulSupport_prod (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → α → β) :
mulSupport (fun x ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i x) ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ s, mulSupport (f i) := by
simp only [mulSupport_subset_iff', Set.mem_iUnion, not_exists, nmem_mulSupport]
exact fun x ↦ prod_eq_one
#align function.mul_support_prod Finset.mulSupport_prod
#align function.support_sum Finset.support_sum
section indicator
open Set
variable {κ : Type*}
/-- Consider a product of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (· ^ n)`, which maps a second argument of `1` to `1`. Then if `f` is replaced by the
corresponding multiplicative indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly larger
finset without changing the value of the product. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sum of `g i (f i)` over a finset. Suppose `g` is a function such as
`n ↦ (n • ·)`, which maps a second argument of `0` to `0` (or a weighted sum of `f i * h i` or
`f i • h i`, where `f` gives the weights that are multiplied by some other function `h`). Then if
`f` is replaced by the corresponding indicator function, the finset may be replaced by a possibly
larger finset without changing the value of the sum."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one [One α] (f : ι → α) (g : ι → α → β) {s t : Finset ι}
(h : s ⊆ t) (hg : ∀ a, g a 1 = 1) :
∏ i ∈ t, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (f i) := by
calc
_ = ∏ i ∈ s, g i (mulIndicator ↑s f i) := by rw [prod_subset h fun i _ hn ↦ by simp [hn, hg]]
-- Porting note: This did not use to need the implicit argument
_ = _ := prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ congr_arg _ <| mulIndicator_of_mem (α := ι) hi f
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset_of_eq_one Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one
#align set.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero Finset.sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero
/-- Taking the product of an indicator function over a possibly larger finset is the same as
taking the original function over the original finset. -/
@[to_additive "Summing an indicator function over a possibly larger `Finset` is the same as summing
the original function over the original finset."]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_subset (f : ι → β) {s t : Finset ι} (h : s ⊆ t) :
∏ i ∈ t, mulIndicator (↑s) f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
prod_mulIndicator_subset_of_eq_one _ (fun _ ↦ id) h fun _ ↦ rfl
#align set.prod_mul_indicator_subset Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset
#align set.sum_indicator_subset Finset.sum_indicator_subset
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → κ → β) (t : ι → Set κ) (g : ι → κ)
[DecidablePred fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i] :
∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) (f i) (g i) = ∏ i ∈ s.filter fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i, f i (g i) := by
refine (prod_filter_mul_prod_filter_not s (fun i ↦ g i ∈ t i) _).symm.trans <|
Eq.trans (congr_arg₂ (· * ·) ?_ ?_) (mul_one _)
· exact prod_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
· exact prod_eq_one fun x hx ↦ mulIndicator_of_not_mem (mem_filter.1 hx).2 _
#align finset.prod_mul_indicator_eq_prod_filter Finset.prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter
#align finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter Finset.sum_indicator_eq_sum_filter
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_inter [DecidableEq ι] (s t : Finset ι) (f : ι → β) :
∏ i ∈ s, (t : Set ι).mulIndicator f i = ∏ i ∈ s ∩ t, f i := by
rw [← filter_mem_eq_inter, prod_mulIndicator_eq_prod_filter]; rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_prod (s : Finset ι) (t : Set κ) (f : ι → κ → β) :
mulIndicator t (∏ i ∈ s, f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator t (f i) :=
map_prod (mulIndicatorHom _ _) _ _
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_prod Finset.mulIndicator_prod
#align set.indicator_finset_sum Finset.indicator_sum
variable {κ : Type*}
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β} :
((s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) →
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f = fun a ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f a := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s (by simp) fun i s hi ih hs ↦ funext fun j ↦ ?_
rw [prod_insert hi, set_biUnion_insert, mulIndicator_union_of_not_mem_inter,
ih (hs.subset <| subset_insert _ _)]
simp only [not_exists, exists_prop, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff, not_and]
exact fun hji i' hi' hji' ↦ (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hi' hi).symm <|
hs.elim_set (mem_insert_self _ _) (mem_insert_of_mem hi') _ hji hji'
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion Finset.indicator_biUnion
@[to_additive]
lemma mulIndicator_biUnion_apply (s : Finset ι) (t : ι → Set κ) {f : κ → β}
(h : (s : Set ι).PairwiseDisjoint t) (x : κ) :
mulIndicator (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) f x = ∏ i ∈ s, mulIndicator (t i) f x := by
rw [mulIndicator_biUnion s t h]
#align set.mul_indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion_apply
#align set.indicator_finset_bUnion_apply Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply
end indicator
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_bij_ne_one {s : Finset α} {t : Finset γ} {f : α → β} {g : γ → β}
(i : ∀ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 → γ) (hi : ∀ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ ∈ t)
(i_inj : ∀ a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂, i a₁ h₁₁ h₁₂ = i a₂ h₂₁ h₂₂ → a₁ = a₂)
(i_surj : ∀ b ∈ t, g b ≠ 1 → ∃ a h₁ h₂, i a h₁ h₂ = b) (h : ∀ a h₁ h₂, f a = g (i a h₁ h₂)) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := by
classical
calc
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏ x ∈ s.filter fun x => f x ≠ 1, f x := by rw [prod_filter_ne_one]
_ = ∏ x ∈ t.filter fun x => g x ≠ 1, g x :=
prod_bij (fun a ha => i a (mem_filter.mp ha).1 <| by simpa using (mem_filter.mp ha).2)
?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
_ = ∏ x ∈ t, g x := prod_filter_ne_one _
· intros a ha
refine (mem_filter.mp ha).elim ?_
intros h₁ h₂
refine (mem_filter.mpr ⟨hi a h₁ _, ?_⟩)
specialize h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
rwa [← h]
· intros a₁ ha₁ a₂ ha₂
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₁).elim fun _ha₁₁ _ha₁₂ ↦ ?_
refine (mem_filter.mp ha₂).elim fun _ha₂₁ _ha₂₂ ↦ ?_
apply i_inj
· intros b hb
refine (mem_filter.mp hb).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha₁, ha₂, eq⟩ := i_surj b h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
exact ⟨a, mem_filter.mpr ⟨ha₁, ha₂⟩, eq⟩
· refine (fun a ha => (mem_filter.mp ha).elim fun h₁ h₂ ↦ ?_)
exact h a h₁ fun H ↦ by rw [H] at h₂; simp at h₂
#align finset.prod_bij_ne_one Finset.prod_bij_ne_one
#align finset.sum_bij_ne_zero Finset.sum_bij_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_false {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, g x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_false Finset.prod_dite_of_false
#align finset.sum_dite_of_false Finset.sum_dite_of_false
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_dite_of_true {p : α → Prop} {hp : DecidablePred p} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, p x)
(f : ∀ x : α, p x → β) (g : ∀ x : α, ¬p x → β) :
∏ x ∈ s, (if hx : p x then f x hx else g x hx) = ∏ x : s, f x.val (h x.val x.property) := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x hx => ⟨x, hx⟩) (fun x _ ↦ x) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> aesop
#align finset.prod_dite_of_true Finset.prod_dite_of_true
#align finset.sum_dite_of_true Finset.sum_dite_of_true
@[to_additive]
theorem nonempty_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun H => False.elim <| h <| H.symm ▸ prod_empty) id
#align finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one Finset.nonempty_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one (h : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1) : ∃ a ∈ s, f a ≠ 1 := by
classical
rw [← prod_filter_ne_one] at h
rcases nonempty_of_prod_ne_one h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, (mem_filter.1 hx).1, by simpa using (mem_filter.1 hx).2⟩
#align finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one Finset.exists_ne_one_of_prod_ne_one
#align finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero Finset.exists_ne_zero_of_sum_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ_comm (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = f n * ∏ x ∈ range n, f x := by
rw [range_succ, prod_insert not_mem_range_self]
#align finset.prod_range_succ_comm Finset.prod_range_succ_comm
#align finset.sum_range_succ_comm Finset.sum_range_succ_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ (f : ℕ → β) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + 1), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * f n := by
simp only [mul_comm, prod_range_succ_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_succ Finset.prod_range_succ
#align finset.sum_range_succ Finset.sum_range_succ
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_succ' (f : ℕ → β) :
∀ n : ℕ, (∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ range n, f (k + 1)) * f 0
| 0 => prod_range_succ _ _
| n + 1 => by rw [prod_range_succ _ n, mul_right_comm, ← prod_range_succ' _ n, prod_range_succ]
#align finset.prod_range_succ' Finset.prod_range_succ'
#align finset.sum_range_succ' Finset.sum_range_succ'
@[to_additive]
theorem eventually_constant_prod {u : ℕ → β} {N : ℕ} (hu : ∀ n ≥ N, u n = 1) {n : ℕ} (hn : N ≤ n) :
(∏ k ∈ range n, u k) = ∏ k ∈ range N, u k := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl : n = N + m⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le hn
clear hn
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· simp [← add_assoc, prod_range_succ, hm, hu]
#align finset.eventually_constant_prod Finset.eventually_constant_prod
#align finset.eventually_constant_sum Finset.eventually_constant_sum
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add (f : ℕ → β) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ x ∈ range (n + m), f x) = (∏ x ∈ range n, f x) * ∏ x ∈ range m, f (n + x) := by
induction' m with m hm
· simp
· erw [Nat.add_succ, prod_range_succ, prod_range_succ, hm, mul_assoc]
#align finset.prod_range_add Finset.prod_range_add
#align finset.sum_range_add Finset.sum_range_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_add_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] (f : ℕ → α) (n m : ℕ) :
(∏ k ∈ range (n + m), f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k = ∏ k ∈ Finset.range m, f (n + k) :=
div_eq_of_eq_mul' (prod_range_add f n m)
#align finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range Finset.prod_range_add_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_add_sub_sum_range
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_zero (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 0, f k = 1 := by rw [range_zero, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_range_zero Finset.prod_range_zero
#align finset.sum_range_zero Finset.sum_range_zero
@[to_additive sum_range_one]
theorem prod_range_one (f : ℕ → β) : ∏ k ∈ range 1, f k = f 0 := by
rw [range_one, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_range_one Finset.prod_range_one
#align finset.sum_range_one Finset.sum_range_one
open List
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_map_count [DecidableEq α] (l : List α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) :
(l.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ l.toFinset, f m ^ l.count m := by
induction' l with a s IH; · simp only [map_nil, prod_nil, count_nil, pow_zero, prod_const_one]
simp only [List.map, List.prod_cons, toFinset_cons, IH]
by_cases has : a ∈ s.toFinset
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_erase has, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ← mul_assoc, count_cons_self, pow_succ']
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne (ne_of_mem_erase hx)]
rw [prod_insert has, count_cons_self, count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt mem_toFinset.2 has), pow_one]
congr 1
refine prod_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
rw [count_cons_of_ne]
rintro rfl
exact has hx
#align finset.prod_list_map_count Finset.prod_list_map_count
#align finset.sum_list_map_count Finset.sum_list_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : List α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by simpa using prod_list_map_count s id
#align finset.prod_list_count Finset.prod_list_count
#align finset.sum_list_count Finset.sum_list_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_list_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : List α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
rw [prod_list_count]
refine prod_subset hs fun x _ hx => ?_
rw [mem_toFinset] at hx
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem hx, pow_zero]
#align finset.prod_list_count_of_subset Finset.prod_list_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_list_count_of_subset Finset.sum_list_count_of_subset
theorem sum_filter_count_eq_countP [DecidableEq α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : List α) :
∑ x ∈ l.toFinset.filter p, l.count x = l.countP p := by
simp [Finset.sum, sum_map_count_dedup_filter_eq_countP p l]
#align finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countp Finset.sum_filter_count_eq_countP
open Multiset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_map_count [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M]
(f : α → M) : (s.map f).prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, f m ^ s.count m := by
refine Quot.induction_on s fun l => ?_
simp [prod_list_map_count l f]
#align finset.prod_multiset_map_count Finset.prod_multiset_map_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_map_count Finset.sum_multiset_map_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.prod = ∏ m ∈ s.toFinset, m ^ s.count m := by
convert prod_multiset_map_count s id
rw [Multiset.map_id]
#align finset.prod_multiset_count Finset.prod_multiset_count
#align finset.sum_multiset_count Finset.sum_multiset_count
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_multiset_count_of_subset [DecidableEq α] [CommMonoid α] (m : Multiset α) (s : Finset α)
(hs : m.toFinset ⊆ s) : m.prod = ∏ i ∈ s, i ^ m.count i := by
revert hs
refine Quot.induction_on m fun l => ?_
simp only [quot_mk_to_coe'', prod_coe, coe_count]
apply prod_list_count_of_subset l s
#align finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.prod_multiset_count_of_subset
#align finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset Finset.sum_multiset_count_of_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_mem_multiset [DecidableEq α] (m : Multiset α) (f : { x // x ∈ m } → β) (g : α → β)
(hfg : ∀ x, f x = g x) : ∏ x : { x // x ∈ m }, f x = ∏ x ∈ m.toFinset, g x := by
refine prod_bij' (fun x _ ↦ x) (fun x hx ↦ ⟨x, Multiset.mem_toFinset.1 hx⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;>
simp [hfg]
#align finset.prod_mem_multiset Finset.prod_mem_multiset
#align finset.sum_mem_multiset Finset.sum_mem_multiset
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (unit : p 1) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction _ _ hom unit (Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction Finset.prod_induction
#align finset.sum_induction Finset.sum_induction
/-- To prove a property of a product, it suffices to prove that
the property is multiplicative and holds on factors. -/
@[to_additive "To prove a property of a sum, it suffices to prove that
the property is additive and holds on summands."]
theorem prod_induction_nonempty {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] (f : α → M) (p : M → Prop)
(hom : ∀ a b, p a → p b → p (a * b)) (nonempty : s.Nonempty) (base : ∀ x ∈ s, p <| f x) :
p <| ∏ x ∈ s, f x :=
Multiset.prod_induction_nonempty p hom (by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty.mp nonempty])
(Multiset.forall_mem_map_iff.mpr base)
#align finset.prod_induction_nonempty Finset.prod_induction_nonempty
#align finset.sum_induction_nonempty Finset.sum_induction_nonempty
/-- For any product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can verify
that it's equal to a different function just by checking ratios of adjacent terms.
This is a multiplicative discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus. -/
@[to_additive "For any sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative-monoid-valued function, we can
verify that it's equal to a different function just by checking differences of adjacent terms.
This is a discrete analogue of the fundamental theorem of calculus."]
theorem prod_range_induction (f s : ℕ → β) (base : s 0 = 1)
(step : ∀ n, s (n + 1) = s n * f n) (n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Finset.range n, f k = s n := by
induction' n with k hk
· rw [Finset.prod_range_zero, base]
· simp only [hk, Finset.prod_range_succ, step, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_range_induction Finset.prod_range_induction
#align finset.sum_range_induction Finset.sum_range_induction
/-- A telescoping product along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of a commutative group valued function reduces to
the ratio of the last and first factors. -/
@[to_additive "A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n - 1}` of an additive commutative group valued
function reduces to the difference of the last and first terms."]
theorem prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i) = f n / f 0 := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div Finset.prod_range_div
#align finset.sum_range_sub Finset.sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ i ∈ range n, f i / f (i + 1)) = f 0 / f n := by apply prod_range_induction <;> simp
#align finset.prod_range_div' Finset.prod_range_div'
#align finset.sum_range_sub' Finset.sum_range_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = f 0 * ∏ i ∈ range n, f (i + 1) / f i := by rw [prod_range_div, mul_div_cancel]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div Finset.eq_prod_range_div
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub Finset.eq_sum_range_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem eq_prod_range_div' {M : Type*} [CommGroup M] (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
f n = ∏ i ∈ range (n + 1), if i = 0 then f 0 else f i / f (i - 1) := by
conv_lhs => rw [Finset.eq_prod_range_div f]
simp [Finset.prod_range_succ', mul_comm]
#align finset.eq_prod_range_div' Finset.eq_prod_range_div'
#align finset.eq_sum_range_sub' Finset.eq_sum_range_sub'
/-- A telescoping sum along `{0, ..., n-1}` of an `ℕ`-valued function
reduces to the difference of the last and first terms
when the function we are summing is monotone.
-/
theorem sum_range_tsub [CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid α] [Sub α] [OrderedSub α]
[ContravariantClass α α (· + ·) (· ≤ ·)] {f : ℕ → α} (h : Monotone f) (n : ℕ) :
∑ i ∈ range n, (f (i + 1) - f i) = f n - f 0 := by
apply sum_range_induction
case base => apply tsub_self
case step =>
intro n
have h₁ : f n ≤ f (n + 1) := h (Nat.le_succ _)
have h₂ : f 0 ≤ f n := h (Nat.zero_le _)
rw [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub h₂, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h₁]
#align finset.sum_range_tsub Finset.sum_range_tsub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem prod_const (b : β) : ∏ _x ∈ s, b = b ^ s.card :=
(congr_arg _ <| s.val.map_const b).trans <| Multiset.prod_replicate s.card b
#align finset.prod_const Finset.prod_const
#align finset.sum_const Finset.sum_const
@[to_additive sum_eq_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_eq_pow_card {b : β} (hf : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = b) : ∏ a ∈ s, f a = b ^ s.card :=
(prod_congr rfl hf).trans <| prod_const _
#align finset.prod_eq_pow_card Finset.prod_eq_pow_card
#align finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul Finset.sum_eq_card_nsmul
@[to_additive card_nsmul_add_sum]
theorem pow_card_mul_prod {b : β} : b ^ s.card * ∏ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ a ∈ s, b * f a :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive sum_add_card_nsmul]
theorem prod_mul_pow_card {b : β} : (∏ a ∈ s, f a) * b ^ s.card = ∏ a ∈ s, f a * b :=
(Finset.prod_const b).symm ▸ prod_mul_distrib.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem pow_eq_prod_const (b : β) : ∀ n, b ^ n = ∏ _k ∈ range n, b := by simp
#align finset.pow_eq_prod_const Finset.pow_eq_prod_const
#align finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const Finset.nsmul_eq_sum_const
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_pow (s : Finset α) (n : ℕ) (f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x ^ n = (∏ x ∈ s, f x) ^ n :=
Multiset.prod_map_pow
#align finset.prod_pow Finset.prod_pow
#align finset.sum_nsmul Finset.sum_nsmul
@[to_additive sum_nsmul_assoc]
lemma prod_pow_eq_pow_sum (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℕ) (a : β) :
∏ i ∈ s, a ^ f i = a ^ ∑ i ∈ s, f i :=
cons_induction (by simp) (fun _ _ _ _ ↦ by simp [prod_cons, sum_cons, pow_add, *]) s
#align finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum Finset.prod_pow_eq_pow_sum
/-- A product over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant. -/
@[to_additive
"A sum over `Finset.powersetCard` which only depends on the size of the sets is constant."]
lemma prod_powersetCard (n : ℕ) (s : Finset α) (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ t ∈ powersetCard n s, f t.card = f n ^ s.card.choose n := by
rw [prod_eq_pow_card, card_powersetCard]; rintro a ha; rw [(mem_powersetCard.1 ha).2]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_flip {n : ℕ} (f : ℕ → β) :
(∏ r ∈ range (n + 1), f (n - r)) = ∏ k ∈ range (n + 1), f k := by
induction' n with n ih
· rw [prod_range_one, prod_range_one]
· rw [prod_range_succ', prod_range_succ _ (Nat.succ n)]
simp [← ih]
#align finset.prod_flip Finset.prod_flip
#align finset.sum_flip Finset.sum_flip
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_involution {s : Finset α} {f : α → β} :
∀ (g : ∀ a ∈ s, α) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a * f (g a ha) = 1) (_ : ∀ a ha, f a ≠ 1 → g a ha ≠ a)
(g_mem : ∀ a ha, g a ha ∈ s) (_ : ∀ a ha, g (g a ha) (g_mem a ha) = a),
∏ x ∈ s, f x = 1 := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; haveI := Classical.decEq β
exact
Finset.strongInductionOn s fun s ih g h g_ne g_mem g_inv =>
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun hs => hs.symm ▸ rfl) fun ⟨x, hx⟩ =>
have hmem : ∀ y ∈ (s.erase x).erase (g x hx), y ∈ s := fun y hy =>
mem_of_mem_erase (mem_of_mem_erase hy)
have g_inj : ∀ {x hx y hy}, g x hx = g y hy → x = y := fun {x hx y hy} h => by
rw [← g_inv x hx, ← g_inv y hy]; simp [h]
have ih' : (∏ y ∈ erase (erase s x) (g x hx), f y) = (1 : β) :=
ih ((s.erase x).erase (g x hx))
⟨Subset.trans (erase_subset _ _) (erase_subset _ _), fun h =>
not_mem_erase (g x hx) (s.erase x) (h (g_mem x hx))⟩
(fun y hy => g y (hmem y hy)) (fun y hy => h y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy => g_ne y (hmem y hy))
(fun y hy =>
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = g x hx => by simp [g_inj h] at hy,
mem_erase.2
⟨fun h : g y _ = x => by
have : y = g x hx := g_inv y (hmem y hy) ▸ by simp [h]
simp [this] at hy, g_mem y (hmem y hy)⟩⟩)
fun y hy => g_inv y (hmem y hy)
if hx1 : f x = 1 then
ih' ▸
Eq.symm
(prod_subset hmem fun y hy hy₁ =>
have : y = x ∨ y = g x hx := by
simpa [hy, -not_and, mem_erase, not_and_or, or_comm] using hy₁
this.elim (fun hy => hy.symm ▸ hx1) fun hy =>
h x hx ▸ hy ▸ hx1.symm ▸ (one_mul _).symm)
else by
rw [← insert_erase hx, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ←
insert_erase (mem_erase.2 ⟨g_ne x hx hx1, g_mem x hx⟩),
prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _), ih', mul_one, h x hx]
#align finset.prod_involution Finset.prod_involution
#align finset.sum_involution Finset.sum_involution
/-- The product of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the product over `b ∈ s.image g` of
`f b` to the power of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.prod_image`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the composition of functions `f` and `g`, is the sum over `b ∈ s.image g`
of `f b` times of the cardinality of the fibre of `b`. See also `Finset.sum_image`."]
theorem prod_comp [DecidableEq γ] (f : γ → β) (g : α → γ) :
∏ a ∈ s, f (g a) = ∏ b ∈ s.image g, f b ^ (s.filter fun a => g a = b).card := by
simp_rw [← prod_const, prod_fiberwise_of_maps_to' fun _ ↦ mem_image_of_mem _]
#align finset.prod_comp Finset.prod_comp
#align finset.sum_comp Finset.sum_comp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_piecewise [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f g : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s, (t.piecewise f g) x) = (∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, g x := by
erw [prod_ite, filter_mem_eq_inter, ← sdiff_eq_filter]
#align finset.prod_piecewise Finset.prod_piecewise
#align finset.sum_piecewise Finset.sum_piecewise
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_inter_mul_prod_diff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α) (f : α → β) :
(∏ x ∈ s ∩ t, f x) * ∏ x ∈ s \ t, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
convert (s.prod_piecewise t f f).symm
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [Finset.piecewise]
#align finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff Finset.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff
#align finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff Finset.sum_inter_add_sum_diff
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = f i * ∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x := by
convert (s.prod_inter_mul_prod_diff {i} f).symm
simp [h]
#align finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton Finset.prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton
#align finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton Finset.sum_eq_add_sum_diff_singleton
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Group/Finset.lean | 1,866 | 1,868 | theorem prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {i : α} (h : i ∈ s)
(f : α → β) : ∏ x ∈ s, f x = (∏ x ∈ s \ {i}, f x) * f i := by |
rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h, mul_comm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
#align_import group_theory.perm.fin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e1c1263b6a25eb90bf16e80d8f47a657e403c4c"
/-!
# Permutations of `Fin n`
-/
open Equiv
/-- Permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` are equivalent to fixing a single
`Fin (n + 1)` and permuting the remaining with a `Perm (Fin n)`.
The fixed `Fin (n + 1)` is swapped with `0`. -/
def Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin {n : ℕ} : Perm (Fin n.succ) ≃ Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n) :=
((Equiv.permCongr <| finSuccEquiv n).trans Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption).trans
(Equiv.prodCongr (finSuccEquiv n).symm (Equiv.refl _))
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, Equiv.refl _) = swap 0 p := by
simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Equiv.permCongr_def]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_refl Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, 1) = swap 0 p :=
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl p
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 0 = p := by simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_zero Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin n)) (p : Fin (n + 1))
(x : Fin n) : Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) x.succ = swap 0 p (e x).succ := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p
· simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· intro i
by_cases h : i = e x
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· simp [h, Fin.succ_ne_zero, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map,
swap_apply_def, Ne.symm h]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_succ Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin (n + 1))) (p : Fin (n + 2)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 1 = swap 0 p (e 0).succ := by
rw [← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ e p 0]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Perm.sign (Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e)) = ite (p = 0) 1 (-1) * Perm.sign e := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p <;> simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Fin.succ_ne_zero]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin.symm_sign Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign
/-- The set of all permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` can be constructed by augmenting the set of
permutations of `Fin n` by each element of `Fin (n + 1)` in turn. -/
theorem Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ {n : ℕ} :
@Finset.univ (Perm <| Fin n.succ) _ =
(Finset.univ : Finset <| Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n)).map
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm.toEmbedding :=
(Finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding _).symm
#align finset.univ_perm_fin_succ Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ
section CycleRange
/-! ### `cycleRange` section
Define the permutations `Fin.cycleRange i`, the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)`.
-/
open Equiv.Perm
-- Porting note: renamed from finRotate_succ because there is already a theorem with that name
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Fin.lean | 95 | 106 | theorem finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin {n : ℕ} :
finRotate n.succ = decomposeFin.symm (1, finRotate n) := by |
ext i
cases n; · simp
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· simp
rw [coe_finRotate, decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ, if_congr i.succ_eq_last_succ rfl rfl]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [Fin.val_succ, Function.Injective.map_swap Fin.val_injective, Fin.val_succ, coe_finRotate,
if_neg h, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) (Nat.succ_succ_ne_one _)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Pi
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Equiv
#align_import topology.uniform_space.uniform_convergence_topology from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"98e83c3d541c77cdb7da20d79611a780ff8e7d90"
/-!
# Topology and uniform structure of uniform convergence
This files endows `α → β` with the topologies / uniform structures of
- uniform convergence on `α`
- uniform convergence on a specified family `𝔖` of sets of `α`, also called `𝔖`-convergence
Since `α → β` is already endowed with the topologies and uniform structures of pointwise
convergence, we introduce type aliases `UniformFun α β` (denoted `α →ᵤ β`) and
`UniformOnFun α β 𝔖` (denoted `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`) and we actually endow *these* with the structures
of uniform and `𝔖`-convergence respectively.
Usual examples of the second construction include :
- the topology of compact convergence, when `𝔖` is the set of compacts of `α`
- the strong topology on the dual of a topological vector space (TVS) `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of
Von Neumann bounded subsets of `E`
- the weak-* topology on the dual of a TVS `E`, when `𝔖` is the set of singletons of `E`.
This file contains a lot of technical facts, so it is heavily commented, proofs included!
## Main definitions
* `UniformFun.gen`: basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence. These are sets
of the form `S(V) := {(f, g) | ∀ x : α, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for some `V : Set (β × β)`
* `UniformFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of uniform convergence. This is the
`UniformSpace` on `α →ᵤ β` whose uniformity is generated by the sets `S(V)` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β`.
We will denote this uniform space as `𝒰(α, β, uβ)`, both in the comments and as a local notation
in the Lean code, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`: uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, where
`𝔖 : Set (Set α)`. This is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback of `𝒰 S β` by the map of
restriction to `S`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform space structure
on `β`.
This is declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`.
## Main statements
### Basic properties
* `UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval`: evaluation is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
* `UniformFun.t2Space`: the topology of uniform convergence on `α →ᵤ β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂.
* `UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly`: `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` is
indeed the uniform structure of uniform convergence
* `UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem`: evaluation at a point contained in a
set of `𝔖` is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`
* `UniformOnFun.t2Space_of_covering`: the topology of `𝔖`-convergence on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is T₂ if
`β` is T₂ and `𝔖` covers `α`
* `UniformOnFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformlyOn`:
`𝒱(α, β, 𝔖 uβ)` is indeed the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence
### Functoriality and compatibility with product of uniform spaces
In order to avoid the need for filter bases as much as possible when using these definitions,
we develop an extensive API for manipulating these structures abstractly. As usual in the topology
section of mathlib, we first state results about the complete lattices of `UniformSpace`s on
fixed types, and then we use these to deduce categorical-like results about maps between two
uniform spaces.
We only describe these in the harder case of `𝔖`-convergence, as the names of the corresponding
results for uniform convergence can easily be guessed.
#### Order statements
* `UniformOnFun.mono`: let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and
`𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and `𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`.
* `UniformOnFun.iInf_eq`: if `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i)`.
* `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`: if `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁)`.
An interesting note about these statements is that they are proved without ever unfolding the basis
definition of the uniform structure of uniform convergence! Instead, we build a
(not very interesting) Galois connection `UniformFun.gc` and then rely on the Galois
connection API to do most of the work.
#### Morphism statements (unbundled)
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous`: if `f : γ → β` is uniformly
continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is uniformly continuous.
* `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformInducing`: if `f : γ → β` is a uniform
inducing, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform inducing.
* `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`: let `f : γ → α`, `𝔖 : Set (Set α)`,
`𝔗 : Set (Set γ)`, and assume that `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, f '' T ∈ 𝔖`. Then, the function
`(fun g ↦ g ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β)` is uniformly continuous.
#### Isomorphism statements (bundled)
* `UniformOnFun.congrRight`: turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by post-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.congrLeft`: turn a bijection `e : γ ≃ α` such that we have both
`∀ T ∈ 𝔗, e '' T ∈ 𝔖` and `∀ S ∈ 𝔖, e ⁻¹' S ∈ 𝔗` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by pre-composing.
* `UniformOnFun.uniformEquivPiComm`: the natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i`
and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform isomorphism between `α →ᵤ[𝔖] (Π i, δ i)` and
`Π i, α →ᵤ[𝔖] δ i`.
#### Important use cases
* If `G` is a uniform group, then `α →ᵤ[𝔖] G` is a uniform group: since `(/) : G × G → G` is
uniformly continuous, `UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous` tells us that
`((/) ∘ —) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G × G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is uniformly continuous. By precomposing with
`UniformOnFun.uniformEquivProdArrow`, this gives that
`(/) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] G)` is also uniformly continuous
* The transpose of a continuous linear map is continuous for the strong topologies: since
continuous linear maps are uniformly continuous and map bounded sets to bounded sets,
this is just a special case of `UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous`.
## TODO
* Show that the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence is exactly the structure of `𝔖'`-convergence,
where `𝔖'` is the ***noncovering*** bornology (i.e ***not*** what `Bornology` currently refers
to in mathlib) generated by `𝔖`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
uniform convergence
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical Topology Uniformity
open Set Filter
section TypeAlias
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence. We denote it `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun (α β : Type*) :=
α → β
#align uniform_fun UniformFun
/-- The type of functions from `α` to `β` equipped with the uniform structure and topology of
uniform convergence on some family `𝔖` of subsets of `α`. We denote it `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def UniformOnFun (α β : Type*) (_ : Set (Set α)) :=
α → β
#align uniform_on_fun UniformOnFun
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ " β:0 => UniformFun α β
@[inherit_doc] scoped[UniformConvergence] notation:25 α " →ᵤ[" 𝔖 "] " β:0 => UniformOnFun α β 𝔖
open UniformConvergence
variable {α β : Type*} {𝔖 : Set (Set α)}
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Nonempty β] : Nonempty (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := Pi.instNonempty
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
instance [Subsingleton β] : Subsingleton (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Subsingleton <| α → β
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ β`. -/
def UniformFun.ofFun : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align uniform_fun.of_fun UniformFun.ofFun
/-- Reinterpret `f : α → β` as an element of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.ofFun (𝔖) : (α → β) ≃ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⟨fun x => x, fun x => x, fun _ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
#align uniform_on_fun.of_fun UniformOnFun.ofFun
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformFun.toFun : (α →ᵤ β) ≃ (α → β) :=
UniformFun.ofFun.symm
#align uniform_fun.to_fun UniformFun.toFun
/-- Reinterpret `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` as an element of `α → β`. -/
def UniformOnFun.toFun (𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ (α → β) :=
(UniformOnFun.ofFun 𝔖).symm
#align uniform_on_fun.to_fun UniformOnFun.toFun
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun (ofFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ β) : ofFun (toFun f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.toFun_ofFun (f : α → β) : toFun 𝔖 (ofFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
@[simp] lemma UniformOnFun.ofFun_toFun (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) : ofFun 𝔖 (toFun 𝔖 f) = f := rfl
-- Note: we don't declare a `CoeFun` instance because Lean wouldn't insert it when writing
-- `f x` (because of definitional equality with `α → β`).
end TypeAlias
open UniformConvergence
namespace UniformFun
variable (α β : Type*) {γ ι : Type*}
variable {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {g : ι → α}
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of uniform convergence: `gen α β V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)`
of functions `α →ᵤ β` such that `∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. -/
protected def gen (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β) | ∀ x, (toFun uv.1 x, toFun uv.2 x) ∈ V }
#align uniform_fun.gen UniformFun.gen
/-- If `𝓕` is a filter on `β × β`, then the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` is a filter basis on `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to `𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when
`β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for any filter in
order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint (see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝓑 : Filter <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun V : Set (β × β) => V ∈ 𝓑) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
⟨⟨univ, univ_mem⟩, @fun U V hU hV =>
⟨U ∩ V, inter_mem hU hV, fun _ huv => ⟨fun x => (huv x).left, fun x => (huv x).right⟩⟩⟩
#align uniform_fun.is_basis_gen UniformFun.isBasis_gen
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the set of all `UniformFun.gen α β V` for
`V ∈ 𝓕` as a bundled `FilterBasis` over `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)`. This will only be applied to
`𝓕 = 𝓤 β` when `β` is equipped with a `UniformSpace` structure, but it is useful to define it for
any filter in order to be able to state that it has a lower adjoint
(see `UniformFun.gc`). -/
protected def basis (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : FilterBasis ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β 𝓕).filterBasis
#align uniform_fun.basis UniformFun.basis
/-- For `𝓕 : Filter (β × β)`, this is the filter generated by the filter basis
`UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕`. For `𝓕 = 𝓤 β`, this will be the uniformity of uniform
convergence on `α`. -/
protected def filter (𝓕 : Filter <| β × β) : Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) :=
(UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).filter
#align uniform_fun.filter UniformFun.filter
--local notation "Φ" => fun (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) =>
--(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
protected def phi (α β : Type*) (uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α) : β × β :=
(uvx.fst.fst uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2)
set_option quotPrecheck false -- Porting note: error message suggested to do this
/- This is a lower adjoint to `UniformFun.filter` (see `UniformFun.gc`).
The exact definition of the lower adjoint `l` is not interesting; we will only use that it exists
(in `UniformFun.mono` and `UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
local notation "lowerAdjoint" => fun 𝓐 => map (UniformFun.phi α β) (𝓐 ×ˢ ⊤)
/-- The function `UniformFun.filter α β : Filter (β × β) → Filter ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β))`
has a lower adjoint `l` (in the sense of `GaloisConnection`). The exact definition of `l` is not
interesting; we will only use that it exists (in `UniformFun.mono` and
`UniformFun.iInf_eq`) and that
`l (Filter.map (Prod.map f f) 𝓕) = Filter.map (Prod.map ((∘) f) ((∘) f)) (l 𝓕)` for each
`𝓕 : Filter (γ × γ)` and `f : γ → α` (in `UniformFun.comap_eq`). -/
protected theorem gc : GaloisConnection lowerAdjoint fun 𝓕 => UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 := by
intro 𝓐 𝓕
symm
calc
𝓐 ≤ UniformFun.filter α β 𝓕 ↔ (UniformFun.basis α β 𝓕).sets ⊆ 𝓐.sets := by
rw [UniformFun.filter, ← FilterBasis.generate, le_generate_iff]
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕, UniformFun.gen α β U ∈ 𝓐 := image_subset_iff
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uv | ∀ x, (uv, x) ∈ { t : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (t.1.1 t.2, t.1.2 t.2) ∈ U } } ∈
𝓐 :=
Iff.rfl
_ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓕,
{ uvx : ((α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ β)) × α | (uvx.1.1 uvx.2, uvx.1.2 uvx.2) ∈ U } ∈
𝓐 ×ˢ (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall₂_congr fun U _hU => mem_prod_top.symm
_ ↔ lowerAdjoint 𝓐 ≤ 𝓕 := Iff.rfl
#align uniform_fun.gc UniformFun.gc
variable [UniformSpace β]
/-- Core of the uniform structure of uniform convergence. -/
protected def uniformCore : UniformSpace.Core (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.Core.mkOfBasis (UniformFun.basis α β (𝓤 β))
(fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ _ => hVU ▸ fun _ => refl_mem_uniformity hV)
(fun _ ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
⟨UniformFun.gen α β (Prod.swap ⁻¹' V), ⟨Prod.swap ⁻¹' V, tendsto_swap_uniformity hV, rfl⟩,
fun _ huv x => huv x⟩)
fun _ ⟨_, hV, hVU⟩ =>
hVU ▸
let ⟨W, hW, hWV⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hV
⟨UniformFun.gen α β W, ⟨W, hW, rfl⟩, fun _ ⟨w, huw, hwv⟩ x => hWV ⟨w x, ⟨huw x, hwv x⟩⟩⟩
#align uniform_fun.uniform_core UniformFun.uniformCore
/-- Uniform structure of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`.
We will denote it `𝒰(α, β, uβ)` in the rest of this file. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
UniformSpace.ofCore (UniformFun.uniformCore α β)
/-- Topology of uniform convergence, declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ β) :=
inferInstance
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- By definition, the uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}`
for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis (· ∈ 𝓤 β) (UniformFun.gen α β) :=
(UniformFun.isBasis_gen α β (𝓤 β)).hasBasis
#align uniform_fun.has_basis_uniformity UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity
/-- The uniformity of `α →ᵤ β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as
a filter basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β` (in the case `𝓑 = (𝓤 β).as_basis` this is true by
definition). -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) : (𝓤 (α →ᵤ β)).HasBasis p (UniformFun.gen α β ∘ s) :=
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).to_hasBasis
(fun _ hU =>
let ⟨i, hi, hiU⟩ := h.mem_iff.mp hU
⟨i, hi, fun _ huv x => hiU (huv x)⟩)
fun i hi => ⟨s i, h.mem_of_mem hi, subset_refl _⟩
#align uniform_fun.has_basis_uniformity_of_basis UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter
basis, for any basis `𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis p fun i => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β (s i) } :=
nhds_basis_uniformity' (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β h)
#align uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds_of_basis UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ β`, `𝓝 f` admits the family `{g | ∀ x, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a
filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun V => V ∈ 𝓤 β) fun V => { g | (f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V } :=
UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β f (Filter.basis_sets _)
#align uniform_fun.has_basis_nhds UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds
variable {α}
/-- Evaluation at a fixed point is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval (x : α) :
UniformContinuous (Function.eval x ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → β) := by
change _ ≤ _
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).le_basis_iff ((𝓤 _).basis_sets.comap _)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv => huv x⟩
#align uniform_fun.uniform_continuous_eval UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval
variable {β}
@[simp]
protected lemma mem_gen {f g : α →ᵤ β} {V : Set (β × β)} :
(f, g) ∈ UniformFun.gen α β V ↔ ∀ x, (toFun f x, toFun g x) ∈ V :=
.rfl
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ` and `u₁ ≤ u₂`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono : Monotone (@UniformFun.uniformSpace α γ) := fun _ _ hu =>
(UniformFun.gc α γ).monotone_u hu
#align uniform_fun.mono UniformFun.mono
/-- If `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)`. -/
protected theorem iInf_eq {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} : 𝒰(α, γ, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
ext : 1
change UniformFun.filter α γ 𝓤[⨅ i, u i] = 𝓤[⨅ i, 𝒰(α, γ, u i)]
rw [iInf_uniformity, iInf_uniformity]
exact (UniformFun.gc α γ).u_iInf
#align uniform_fun.infi_eq UniformFun.iInf_eq
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem inf_eq {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} :
𝒰(α, γ, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒰(α, γ, u₁) ⊓ 𝒰(α, γ, u₂) := by
-- This follows directly from the fact that the upper adjoint in a Galois connection maps
-- infimas to infimas.
rw [inf_eq_iInf, inf_eq_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
cases i <;> rfl
#align uniform_fun.inf_eq UniformFun.inf_eq
/-- Post-composition by a uniform inducing function is
a uniform inducing function for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniform inducing,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is uniform inducing. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformInducing [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β} (hf : UniformInducing f) :
UniformInducing (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) :=
⟨((UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).comap _).eq_of_same_basis <|
UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ (hf.basis_uniformity (𝓤 β).basis_sets)⟩
#align uniform_fun.postcomp_uniform_inducing UniformFun.postcomp_uniformInducing
/-- Post-composition by a uniform embedding is
a uniform embedding for the uniform structures of uniform convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform embedding,
then `(f ∘ ·) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)` is a uniform embedding. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformEmbedding [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β} (hf : UniformEmbedding f) :
UniformEmbedding (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) where
toUniformInducing := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformInducing hf.toUniformInducing
inj _ _ H := funext fun _ ↦ hf.inj (congrFun H _)
-- Porting note: had to add a type annotation at `((f ∘ ·) : ((α → γ) → (α → β)))`
/-- If `u` is a uniform structures on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒰(α, γ, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒰(α, γ, u₁)`. -/
protected theorem comap_eq {f : γ → β} :
𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := by
letI : UniformSpace γ := .comap f ‹_›
exact (UniformFun.postcomp_uniformInducing (f := f) ⟨rfl⟩).comap_uniformSpace.symm
#align uniform_fun.comap_eq UniformFun.comap_eq
/-- Post-composition by a uniformly continuous function is uniformly continuous on `α →ᵤ β`.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniformly continuous, then `(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ γ) → (α →ᵤ β)`
is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformContinuous [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) :
UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun : (α →ᵤ γ) → α →ᵤ β) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformFun.comap_eq`
refine uniformContinuous_iff.mpr ?_
exact (UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)).trans_eq UniformFun.comap_eq
-- Porting note: the original calc proof below gives a deterministic timeout
--calc
-- 𝒰(α, γ, _) ≤ 𝒰(α, γ, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) :=
-- UniformFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf)
-- _ = 𝒰(α, β, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := @UniformFun.comap_eq α β γ _ f
#align uniform_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous
/-- Turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism `(α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by
post-composing. -/
protected def congrRight [UniformSpace γ] (e : γ ≃ᵤ β) : (α →ᵤ γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) :=
{ Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => e.toEquiv with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.symm.uniformContinuous }
#align uniform_fun.congr_right UniformFun.congrRight
/-- Pre-composition by any function is uniformly continuous for the uniform structures of
uniform convergence.
More precisely, for any `f : γ → α`, the function `(· ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ β) → (γ →ᵤ β)` is uniformly
continuous. -/
protected theorem precomp_uniformContinuous {f : γ → α} :
UniformContinuous fun g : α →ᵤ β => ofFun (toFun g ∘ f) := by
-- Here we simply go back to filter bases.
rw [UniformContinuous,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β).tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity γ β)]
exact fun U hU => ⟨U, hU, fun uv huv x => huv (f x)⟩
#align uniform_fun.precomp_uniform_continuous UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
/-- Turn a bijection `γ ≃ α` into a uniform isomorphism
`(γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β)` by pre-composing. -/
protected def congrLeft (e : γ ≃ α) : (γ →ᵤ β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toEquiv := e.arrowCongr (.refl _)
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
#align uniform_fun.congr_left UniformFun.congrLeft
/-- The natural map `UniformFun.toFun` from `α →ᵤ β` to `α → β` is uniformly continuous.
In other words, the uniform structure of uniform convergence is finer than that of pointwise
convergence, aka the product uniform structure. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_toFun : UniformContinuous (toFun : (α →ᵤ β) → α → β) := by
-- By definition of the product uniform structure, this is just `uniform_continuous_eval`.
rw [uniformContinuous_pi]
intro x
exact uniformContinuous_eval β x
#align uniform_fun.uniform_continuous_to_fun UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun
/-- The topology of uniform convergence is T₂. -/
instance [T2Space β] : T2Space (α →ᵤ β) :=
.of_injective_continuous toFun.injective UniformFun.uniformContinuous_toFun.continuous
/-- The topology of uniform convergence indeed gives the same notion of convergence as
`TendstoUniformly`. -/
protected theorem tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly {F : ι → α →ᵤ β} {f : α →ᵤ β} :
Tendsto F p (𝓝 f) ↔ TendstoUniformly (toFun ∘ F) (toFun f) p := by
rw [(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds α β f).tendsto_right_iff, TendstoUniformly]
simp only [mem_setOf, UniformFun.gen, Function.comp_def]
#align uniform_fun.tendsto_iff_tendsto_uniformly UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly
/-- The natural bijection between `α → β × γ` and `(α → β) × (α → γ)`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ β × γ` and `(α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ)`. -/
protected def uniformEquivProdArrow [UniformSpace γ] : (α →ᵤ β × γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) × (α →ᵤ γ) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (𝒰(α, β, uβ) × 𝒰(α, γ, uγ)) = 𝒰(α, β × γ, uβ × uγ)`.
-- But `uβ × uγ` is defined as `comap fst uβ ⊓ comap snd uγ`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.inf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
Equiv.toUniformEquivOfUniformInducing (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) <| by
constructor
change
comap (Prod.map (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _) (Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow _ _ _))
_ = _
simp_rw [UniformFun]
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold instUniformSpaceProd
rw [UniformSpace.comap_inf, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap, ← UniformSpace.comap_comap]
have := (@UniformFun.inf_eq α (β × γ)
(UniformSpace.comap Prod.fst ‹_›) (UniformSpace.comap Prod.snd ‹_›)).symm
rwa [UniformFun.comap_eq, UniformFun.comap_eq] at this
#align uniform_fun.uniform_equiv_prod_arrow UniformFun.uniformEquivProdArrow
-- the relevant diagram commutes by definition
variable (α) (δ : ι → Type*) [∀ i, UniformSpace (δ i)]
/-- The natural bijection between `α → Π i, δ i` and `Π i, α → δ i`, upgraded to a uniform
isomorphism between `α →ᵤ (Π i, δ i)` and `Π i, α →ᵤ δ i`. -/
protected def uniformEquivPiComm : UniformEquiv (α →ᵤ ∀ i, δ i) (∀ i, α →ᵤ δ i) :=
-- Denote `φ` this bijection. We want to show that
-- `comap φ (Π i, 𝒰(α, δ i, uδ i)) = 𝒰(α, (Π i, δ i), (Π i, uδ i))`.
-- But `Π i, uδ i` is defined as `⨅ i, comap (eval i) (uδ i)`, so we just have to apply
-- `UniformFun.iInf_eq` and `UniformFun.comap_eq`, which leaves us to check
-- that some square commutes.
@Equiv.toUniformEquivOfUniformInducing
_ _ 𝒰(α, ∀ i, δ i, Pi.uniformSpace δ)
(@Pi.uniformSpace ι (fun i => α → δ i) fun i => 𝒰(α, δ i, _)) (Equiv.piComm _) <| by
refine @UniformInducing.mk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
change comap (Prod.map Function.swap Function.swap) _ = _
rw [← uniformity_comap]
congr
unfold Pi.uniformSpace
rw [UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore, UniformSpace.ofCoreEq_toCore,
UniformSpace.comap_iInf, UniformFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
rw [← UniformSpace.comap_comap, UniformFun.comap_eq]
rfl
#align uniform_fun.uniform_equiv_Pi_comm UniformFun.uniformEquivPiComm
-- Like in the previous lemma, the diagram actually commutes by definition
/-- The set of continuous functions is closed in the uniform convergence topology.
This is a simple wrapper over `TendstoUniformly.continuous`. -/
theorem isClosed_setOf_continuous [TopologicalSpace α] :
IsClosed {f : α →ᵤ β | Continuous (toFun f)} := by
refine isClosed_iff_forall_filter.2 fun f u _ hu huf ↦ ?_
rw [← tendsto_id', UniformFun.tendsto_iff_tendstoUniformly] at huf
exact huf.continuous (le_principal_iff.mp hu)
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_inf_precomp_of_cover {δ₁ δ₂ : Type*} (φ₁ : δ₁ → α) (φ₂ : δ₂ → α)
(h_cover : range φ₁ ∪ range φ₂ = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) =
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₁) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₁, β, _) ⊓
.comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ₂) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ₂, β, _) := by
ext : 1
refine le_antisymm (le_inf ?_ ?_) ?_
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· exact tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
· refine
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₁ β |>.comap _).inf
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity δ₂ β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨U, U⟩, ⟨hU, hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases h_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with (⟨y, rfl⟩|⟨y, rfl⟩)
· exact hfg.1 y
· exact hfg.2 y
variable {α} (β) in
theorem uniformSpace_eq_iInf_precomp_of_cover {δ : ι → Type*} (φ : Π i, δ i → α)
(h_cover : ∃ I : Set ι, I.Finite ∧ ⋃ i ∈ I, range (φ i) = univ) :
𝒰(α, β, _) = ⨅ i, .comap (ofFun ∘ (· ∘ φ i) ∘ toFun) 𝒰(δ i, β, _) := by
ext : 1
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap]
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ tendsto_iff_comap.mp UniformFun.precomp_uniformContinuous) ?_
rcases h_cover with ⟨I, I_finite, I_cover⟩
refine Filter.hasBasis_iInf (fun i : ι ↦ UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity (δ i) β |>.comap _)
|>.le_basis_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity α β) |>.mpr fun U hU ↦
⟨⟨I, fun _ ↦ U⟩, ⟨I_finite, fun _ ↦ hU⟩, fun ⟨f, g⟩ hfg x ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.mp <| I_cover.ge <| mem_univ x with ⟨i, hi, y, rfl⟩
exact mem_iInter.mp hfg ⟨i, hi⟩ y
end UniformFun
namespace UniformOnFun
variable {α β : Type*} {γ ι : Type*}
variable {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {g : ι → α}
local notation "𝒰(" α ", " β ", " u ")" => @UniformFun.uniformSpace α β u
/-- Basis sets for the uniformity of `𝔖`-convergence: for `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`,
`gen 𝔖 S V` is the set of pairs `(f, g)` of functions `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` such that
`∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V`. Note that the family `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is only used to specify which
type alias of `α → β` to use here. -/
protected def gen (𝔖) (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
{ uv : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) | ∀ x ∈ S, (toFun 𝔖 uv.1 x, toFun 𝔖 uv.2 x) ∈ V }
#align uniform_on_fun.gen UniformOnFun.gen
/-- For `S : Set α` and `V : Set (β × β)`, we have
`UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V = (S.restrict × S.restrict) ⁻¹' (UniformFun.gen S β V)`.
This is the crucial fact for proving that the family `UniformOnFun.gen S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓤 β` is indeed a basis for the uniformity `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` endowed with `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`
the uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, as defined in `UniformOnFun.uniformSpace`. -/
protected theorem gen_eq_preimage_restrict {𝔖} (S : Set α) (V : Set (β × β)) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V =
Prod.map (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) (S.restrict ∘ UniformFun.toFun) ⁻¹'
UniformFun.gen S β V := by
ext uv
exact ⟨fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ => h x hx, fun h x hx => h ⟨x, hx⟩⟩
#align uniform_on_fun.gen_eq_preimage_restrict UniformOnFun.gen_eq_preimage_restrict
/-- `UniformOnFun.gen` is antitone in the first argument and monotone in the second. -/
protected theorem gen_mono {𝔖} {S S' : Set α} {V V' : Set (β × β)} (hS : S' ⊆ S) (hV : V ⊆ V') :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V ⊆ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S' V' := fun _uv h x hx => hV (h x <| hS hx)
#align uniform_on_fun.gen_mono UniformOnFun.gen_mono
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis on `β × β`, then the
family `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S V` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` is a filter basis on
`(α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) × (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)`.
We will show in `has_basis_uniformity_of_basis` that, if `𝓑` is a basis for `𝓤 β`, then the
corresponding filter is the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem isBasis_gen (𝔖 : Set (Set α)) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
(𝓑 : FilterBasis <| β × β) :
IsBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓑) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
⟨h.prod 𝓑.nonempty, fun {U₁V₁ U₂V₂} h₁ h₂ =>
let ⟨U₃, hU₃, hU₁₃, hU₂₃⟩ := h' U₁V₁.1 h₁.1 U₂V₂.1 h₂.1
let ⟨V₃, hV₃, hV₁₂₃⟩ := 𝓑.inter_sets h₁.2 h₂.2
⟨⟨U₃, V₃⟩,
⟨⟨hU₃, hV₃⟩, fun _ H =>
⟨fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₁₃ hx).1, fun x hx => (hV₁₂₃ <| H x <| hU₂₃ hx).2⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align uniform_on_fun.is_basis_gen UniformOnFun.isBasis_gen
variable (α β) [UniformSpace β] (𝔖 : Set (Set α))
/-- Uniform structure of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`,
declared as an instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. It is defined as the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of the pullback
by `S.restrict`, the map of restriction to `S`, of the uniform structure `𝒰(s, β, uβ)` on
`↥S →ᵤ β`. We will denote it `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ)`, where `uβ` is the uniform structure on `β`. -/
instance uniformSpace : UniformSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖),
.comap (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ UniformOnFun.toFun 𝔖) 𝒰(s, β, _)
local notation "𝒱(" α ", " β ", " 𝔖 ", " u ")" => @UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β u 𝔖
/-- Topology of `𝔖`-convergence, i.e uniform convergence on the elements of `𝔖`, declared as an
instance on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, _).toTopologicalSpace
/-- The topology of `𝔖`-convergence is the infimum, for `S ∈ 𝔖`, of topology induced by the map
of `S.restrict : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (↥S →ᵤ β)` of restriction to `S`, where `↥S →ᵤ β` is endowed with
the topology of uniform convergence. -/
protected theorem topologicalSpace_eq :
UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace α β 𝔖 =
⨅ (s : Set α) (_ : s ∈ 𝔖), TopologicalSpace.induced
(UniformFun.ofFun ∘ s.restrict ∘ toFun 𝔖) (UniformFun.topologicalSpace s β) := by
simp only [UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace, UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
rfl
#align uniform_on_fun.topological_space_eq UniformOnFun.topologicalSpace_eq
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)}
(hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) (S : Set α) :
(@uniformity (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ((UniformFun.uniformSpace S β).comap S.restrict)).HasBasis p fun i =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S (s i) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.gen_eq_preimage_restrict, uniformity_comap]
exact (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis S β hb).comap _
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ (h : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop}
{s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
DirectedOn
((fun s : Set α => (UniformFun.uniformSpace s β).comap (s.restrict : (α →ᵤ β) → s →ᵤ β)) ⁻¹'o
GE.ge)
𝔖 :=
h.mono fun _ _ hst =>
((UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _).le_basis_iff
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb _)).mpr
fun V hV => ⟨V, hV, UniformOnFun.gen_mono hst subset_rfl⟩
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed and `𝓑` is a filter basis of `𝓤 β`, then the
uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and
`V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖)
{p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) := by
simp only [iInf_uniformity]
exact
hasBasis_biInf_of_directed h (fun S => UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 S ∘ s) _
(fun S _hS => UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₁ α β 𝔖 hb S)
(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis_aux₂ α β 𝔖 h' hb)
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_uniformity_of_basis UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis
/-- If `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, then the uniformity of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` admits the
family `{(f, g) | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' (𝓤 β).basis_sets
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_uniformity UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity
variable {α β}
/-- Let `t i` be a nonempty directed subfamily of `𝔖`
such that every `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t i`.
Let `V` bounded by `p` be a basis of entourages of `β`.
Then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i) (V j)` bounded by `p j` is a basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis {ι ι' : Type*} [Nonempty ι]
{t : ι → Set α} {p : ι' → Prop} {V : ι' → Set (β × β)} (ht : ∀ i, t i ∈ 𝔖)
(hdir : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ i, s ⊆ t i) (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasBasis (fun i : ι × ι' ↦ p i.2) fun i ↦
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t i.1) (V i.2) := by
have hne : 𝔖.Nonempty := (range_nonempty t).mono (range_subset_iff.2 ht)
have hd : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖 := fun s₁ hs₁ s₂ hs₂ ↦ by
rcases hex s₁ hs₁, hex s₂ hs₂ with ⟨⟨i₁, his₁⟩, i₂, his₂⟩
rcases hdir i₁ i₂ with ⟨i, hi₁, hi₂⟩
exact ⟨t i, ht _, his₁.trans hi₁, his₂.trans hi₂⟩
refine (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 hne hd hb).to_hasBasis
(fun ⟨s, i'⟩ ⟨hs, hi'⟩ ↦ ?_) fun ⟨i, i'⟩ hi' ↦ ⟨(t i, i'), ⟨ht i, hi'⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
rcases hex s hs with ⟨i, hi⟩
exact ⟨(i, i'), hi', UniformOnFun.gen_mono hi Subset.rfl⟩
/-- If `t n` is a monotone sequence of sets in `𝔖`
such that each `s ∈ 𝔖` is included in some `t n`
and `V n` is an antitone basis of entourages of `β`,
then `UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n)` is an antitone basis of entourages of `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
protected theorem hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity {ι : Type*} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{t : ι → Set α} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n)
(hb : HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 β) V) :
(𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)).HasAntitoneBasis fun n ↦ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 (t n) (V n) := by
have := hb.nonempty
refine ⟨(UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_covering_of_basis 𝔖
ht hmono.directed_le hex hb.1).to_hasBasis ?_ fun i _ ↦ ⟨(i, i), trivial, Subset.rfl⟩, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨k, l⟩ -
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) k l with ⟨n, hkn, hln⟩
exact ⟨n, trivial, UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono hkn) (hb.2 <| hln)⟩
· exact fun k l h ↦ UniformOnFun.gen_mono (hmono h) (hb.2 h)
protected theorem isCountablyGenerated_uniformity [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] {t : ℕ → Set α}
(ht : ∀ n, t n ∈ 𝔖) (hmono : Monotone t) (hex : ∀ s ∈ 𝔖, ∃ n, s ⊆ t n) :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)) :=
let ⟨_V, hV⟩ := exists_antitone_basis (𝓤 β)
(UniformOnFun.hasAntitoneBasis_uniformity 𝔖 ht hmono hex hV).isCountablyGenerated
variable (α β)
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓑` as a filter basis, for any basis
`𝓑` of `𝓤 β`. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_basis (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty)
(h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (β × β)} (hb : HasBasis (𝓤 β) p s) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun Si : Set α × ι => Si.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ p Si.2) fun Si =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 Si.1 (s Si.2) } :=
letI : UniformSpace (α → β) := UniformOnFun.uniformSpace α β 𝔖
nhds_basis_uniformity (UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis α β 𝔖 h h' hb)
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds_of_basis UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis
/-- For `f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`, where `𝔖 : Set (Set α)` is nonempty and directed, `𝓝 f` admits the
family `{g | ∀ x ∈ S, (f x, g x) ∈ V}` for `S ∈ 𝔖` and `V ∈ 𝓤 β` as a filter basis. -/
protected theorem hasBasis_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (h : 𝔖.Nonempty) (h' : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) 𝔖) :
(𝓝 f).HasBasis (fun SV : Set α × Set (β × β) => SV.1 ∈ 𝔖 ∧ SV.2 ∈ 𝓤 β) fun SV =>
{ g | (g, f) ∈ UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 SV.1 SV.2 } :=
UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis α β 𝔖 f h h' (Filter.basis_sets _)
#align uniform_on_fun.has_basis_nhds UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds
/-- If `S ∈ 𝔖`, then the restriction to `S` is a uniformly continuous map from `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` to
`↥S →ᵤ β`. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous_restrict (h : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous (UniformFun.ofFun ∘ (s.restrict : (α → β) → s → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
change _ ≤ _
simp only [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, map_le_iff_le_comap, iInf_uniformity]
exact iInf₂_le s h
#align uniform_on_fun.uniform_continuous_restrict UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_restrict
variable {α}
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the uniformity is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem uniformity_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) :
𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s (V i)) := by
simp_rw [iInf_uniformity, uniformity_comap,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis _ _ h).eq_biInf, comap_iInf, comap_principal,
Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.gen, Subtype.forall, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq,
Prod.map_apply, Function.comp_apply, UniformFun.toFun_ofFun, restrict_apply]
protected theorem uniformity_eq : 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 (UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V) :=
UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets
protected theorem gen_mem_uniformity (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
UniformOnFun.gen 𝔖 s V ∈ 𝓤 (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) := by
rw [UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
/-- A version of `UniformOnFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis`
with weaker conclusion and weaker assumptions.
We make no assumptions about the set `𝔖`
but conclude only that the neighbourhoods filter is equal to some indexed infimum. -/
protected theorem nhds_eq_of_basis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {V : ι → Set (β × β)}
(h : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p V) (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V i} := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq_of_basis _ _ h, comap_iInf,
comap_principal, UniformOnFun.gen, preimage_setOf_eq]
protected theorem nhds_eq (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :
𝓝 f = ⨅ s ∈ 𝔖, ⨅ V ∈ 𝓤 β, 𝓟 {g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} :=
UniformOnFun.nhds_eq_of_basis _ _ (𝓤 β).basis_sets f
protected theorem gen_mem_nhds (f : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) {V : Set (β × β)} (hV : V ∈ 𝓤 β) :
{g | ∀ x ∈ s, (toFun 𝔖 f x, toFun 𝔖 g x) ∈ V} ∈ 𝓝 f := by
rw [UniformOnFun.nhds_eq]
apply_rules [mem_iInf_of_mem, mem_principal_self]
theorem uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun :
UniformContinuous fun f : α →ᵤ β ↦ ofFun 𝔖 (UniformFun.toFun f) := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).eventually_iff]
exact fun _ _ U hU ↦ ⟨U, hU, fun f hf x _ ↦ hf x⟩
/-- The uniformity on `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` is the same as the uniformity on `α →ᵤ β`,
provided that `Set.univ ∈ 𝔖`.
Here we formulate it as a `UniformEquiv`. -/
def uniformEquivUniformFun (h : univ ∈ 𝔖) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ β) where
toFun f := UniformFun.ofFun <| toFun _ f
invFun f := ofFun _ <| UniformFun.toFun f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
uniformContinuous_toFun := by
simp only [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity _ _).tendsto_right_iff]
intro U hU
filter_upwards [UniformOnFun.gen_mem_uniformity _ _ h hU] with f hf x using hf x (mem_univ _)
uniformContinuous_invFun := uniformContinuous_ofUniformFun _ _
/-- Let `u₁`, `u₂` be two uniform structures on `γ` and `𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)`. If `u₁ ≤ u₂` and
`𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁` then `𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem mono ⦃u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ⦄ (hu : u₁ ≤ u₂) ⦃𝔖₁ 𝔖₂ : Set (Set α)⦄
(h𝔖 : 𝔖₂ ⊆ 𝔖₁) : 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) :=
calc
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₁, u₁) ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₁) := iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h𝔖
_ ≤ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖₂, u₂) := iInf₂_mono fun _i _hi => UniformSpace.comap_mono <| UniformFun.mono hu
#align uniform_on_fun.mono UniformOnFun.mono
/-- If `x : α` is in some `S ∈ 𝔖`, then evaluation at `x` is uniformly continuous on
`α →ᵤ[𝔖] β`. -/
theorem uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hs : s ∈ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
(UniformFun.uniformContinuous_eval β (⟨x, hxs⟩ : s)).comp
(UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_restrict α β 𝔖 hs)
#align uniform_on_fun.uniform_continuous_eval_of_mem UniformOnFun.uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem
theorem uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem_sUnion {x : α} (hx : x ∈ ⋃₀ 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous ((Function.eval x : (α → β) → β) ∘ toFun 𝔖) :=
let ⟨_s, hs, hxs⟩ := hx
uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem _ _ hxs hs
variable {β} {𝔖}
/-- If `u` is a family of uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, (⨅ i, u i)) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i)`. -/
protected theorem iInf_eq {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, ⨅ i, u i) = ⨅ i, 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u i) := by
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, UniformFun.iInf_eq, UniformSpace.comap_iInf]
rw [iInf_comm]
exact iInf_congr fun s => iInf_comm
#align uniform_on_fun.infi_eq UniformOnFun.iInf_eq
/-- If `u₁` and `u₂` are two uniform structures on `γ`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁) ⊓ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₂)`. -/
protected theorem inf_eq {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁ ⊓ u₂) = 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁) ⊓ 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₂) := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf, inf_eq_iInf, UniformOnFun.iInf_eq]
refine iInf_congr fun i => ?_
cases i <;> rfl
#align uniform_on_fun.inf_eq UniformOnFun.inf_eq
/-- If `u` is a uniform structure on `β` and `f : γ → β`, then
`𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, comap f u) = comap (fun g ↦ f ∘ g) 𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, u₁)`. -/
protected theorem comap_eq {f : γ → β} :
𝒱(α, γ, 𝔖, ‹UniformSpace β›.comap f) = 𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, _).comap (f ∘ ·) := by
-- We reduce this to `UniformFun.comap_eq` using the fact that `comap` distributes
-- on `iInf`.
simp_rw [UniformOnFun.uniformSpace, UniformSpace.comap_iInf, UniformFun.comap_eq, ←
UniformSpace.comap_comap]
-- By definition, `∀ S ∈ 𝔖, (f ∘ —) ∘ S.restrict = S.restrict ∘ (f ∘ —)`.
rfl
#align uniform_on_fun.comap_eq UniformOnFun.comap_eq
/-- Post-composition by a uniformly continuous function is uniformly continuous for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is uniformly continuous, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformContinuous [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : UniformContinuous (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`
rw [uniformContinuous_iff]
exact (UniformOnFun.mono (uniformContinuous_iff.mp hf) subset_rfl).trans_eq UniformOnFun.comap_eq
#align uniform_on_fun.postcomp_uniform_continuous UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous
/-- Post-composition by a uniform inducing is a uniform inducing for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform inducing, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform inducing. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformInducing [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β} (hf : UniformInducing f) :
UniformInducing (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) := by
-- This is a direct consequence of `UniformOnFun.comap_eq`
constructor
replace hf : (𝓤 β).comap (Prod.map f f) = _ := hf.comap_uniformity
change comap (Prod.map (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖)) _ = _
rw [← uniformity_comap] at hf ⊢
congr
rw [← UniformSpace.ext hf, UniformOnFun.comap_eq]
rfl
#align uniform_on_fun.postcomp_uniform_inducing UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformInducing
/-- Post-composition by a uniform embedding is a uniform embedding for the
uniform structures of `𝔖`-convergence.
More precisely, if `f : γ → β` is a uniform embedding, then
`(fun g ↦ f ∘ g) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) → (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` is a uniform embedding. -/
protected theorem postcomp_uniformEmbedding [UniformSpace γ] {f : γ → β} (hf : UniformEmbedding f) :
UniformEmbedding (ofFun 𝔖 ∘ (f ∘ ·) ∘ toFun 𝔖) where
toUniformInducing := UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformInducing hf.toUniformInducing
inj _ _ H := funext fun _ ↦ hf.inj (congrFun H _)
/-- Turn a uniform isomorphism `γ ≃ᵤ β` into a uniform isomorphism `(α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)`
by post-composing. -/
protected def congrRight [UniformSpace γ] (e : γ ≃ᵤ β) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] γ) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
{ Equiv.piCongrRight fun _a => e.toEquiv with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.uniformContinuous
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformOnFun.postcomp_uniformContinuous e.symm.uniformContinuous }
#align uniform_on_fun.congr_right UniformOnFun.congrRight
/-- Let `f : γ → α`, `𝔖 : Set (Set α)`, `𝔗 : Set (Set γ)`, and assume that `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, f '' T ∈ 𝔖`.
Then, the function `(fun g ↦ g ∘ f) : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β)` is uniformly continuous.
Note that one can easily see that assuming `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, ∃ S ∈ 𝔖, f '' T ⊆ S` would work too, but
we will get this for free when we prove that `𝒱(α, β, 𝔖, uβ) = 𝒱(α, β, 𝔖', uβ)` where `𝔖'` is the
***noncovering*** bornology generated by `𝔖`. -/
protected theorem precomp_uniformContinuous {𝔗 : Set (Set γ)} {f : γ → α}
(hf : MapsTo (f '' ·) 𝔗 𝔖) :
UniformContinuous fun g : α →ᵤ[𝔖] β => ofFun 𝔗 (toFun 𝔖 g ∘ f) := by
-- This follows from the fact that `(· ∘ f) × (· ∘ f)` maps `gen (f '' t) V` to `gen t V`.
simp_rw [UniformContinuous, UniformOnFun.uniformity_eq, tendsto_iInf]
refine fun t ht V hV ↦ tendsto_iInf' (f '' t) <| tendsto_iInf' (hf ht) <|
tendsto_iInf' V <| tendsto_iInf' hV ?_
simpa only [tendsto_principal_principal, UniformOnFun.gen] using fun _ ↦ forall_mem_image.1
#align uniform_on_fun.precomp_uniform_continuous UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous
/-- Turn a bijection `e : γ ≃ α` such that we have both `∀ T ∈ 𝔗, e '' T ∈ 𝔖` and
`∀ S ∈ 𝔖, e ⁻¹' S ∈ 𝔗` into a uniform isomorphism `(γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β)` by pre-composing. -/
protected def congrLeft {𝔗 : Set (Set γ)} (e : γ ≃ α) (he : 𝔗 ⊆ image e ⁻¹' 𝔖)
(he' : 𝔖 ⊆ preimage e ⁻¹' 𝔗) : (γ →ᵤ[𝔗] β) ≃ᵤ (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) :=
{ Equiv.arrowCongr e (Equiv.refl _) with
uniformContinuous_toFun := UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous fun s hs ↦ by
change e.symm '' s ∈ 𝔗
rw [← preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm]
exact he' hs
uniformContinuous_invFun := UniformOnFun.precomp_uniformContinuous he }
#align uniform_on_fun.congr_left UniformOnFun.congrLeft
/-- If `𝔖` covers `α`, then the topology of `𝔖`-convergence is T₂. -/
theorem t2Space_of_covering [T2Space β] (h : ⋃₀ 𝔖 = univ) : T2Space (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) where
t2 f g hfg := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := not_forall.mp (mt funext hfg)
obtain ⟨s, hs, hxs⟩ : ∃ s ∈ 𝔖, x ∈ s := mem_sUnion.mp (h.symm ▸ True.intro)
exact separated_by_continuous (uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem β 𝔖 hxs hs).continuous hx
#align uniform_on_fun.t2_space_of_covering UniformOnFun.t2Space_of_covering
/-- The restriction map from `α →ᵤ[𝔖] β` to `⋃₀ 𝔖 → β` is uniformly continuous. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergenceTopology.lean | 977 | 982 | theorem uniformContinuous_restrict_toFun :
UniformContinuous ((⋃₀ 𝔖).restrict ∘ toFun 𝔖 : (α →ᵤ[𝔖] β) → ⋃₀ 𝔖 → β) := by |
rw [uniformContinuous_pi]
intro ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨s : Set α, hs : s ∈ 𝔖, hxs : x ∈ s⟩ := mem_sUnion.mpr hx
exact uniformContinuous_eval_of_mem β 𝔖 hxs hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.supported from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Polynomials supported by a set of variables
This file contains the definition and lemmas about `MvPolynomial.supported`.
## Main definitions
* `MvPolynomial.supported` : Given a set `s : Set σ`, `supported R s` is the subalgebra of
`MvPolynomial σ R` consisting of polynomials whose set of variables is contained in `s`.
This subalgebra is isomorphic to `MvPolynomial s R`.
## Tags
variables, polynomial, vars
-/
universe u v w
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
variable (R)
/-- The set of polynomials whose variables are contained in `s` as a `Subalgebra` over `R`. -/
noncomputable def supported (s : Set σ) : Subalgebra R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Algebra.adjoin R (X '' s)
#align mv_polynomial.supported MvPolynomial.supported
variable {R}
open Algebra
theorem supported_eq_range_rename (s : Set σ) : supported R s = (rename ((↑) : s → σ)).range := by
rw [supported, Set.image_eq_range, adjoin_range_eq_range_aeval, rename]
congr
#align mv_polynomial.supported_eq_range_rename MvPolynomial.supported_eq_range_rename
/-- The isomorphism between the subalgebra of polynomials supported by `s` and
`MvPolynomial s R`. -/
noncomputable def supportedEquivMvPolynomial (s : Set σ) : supported R s ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial s R :=
(Subalgebra.equivOfEq _ _ (supported_eq_range_rename s)).trans
(AlgEquiv.ofInjective (rename ((↑) : s → σ)) (rename_injective _ Subtype.val_injective)).symm
#align mv_polynomial.supported_equiv_mv_polynomial MvPolynomial.supportedEquivMvPolynomial
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: the `simpNF` linter complained about this lemma.
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Supported.lean | 59 | 62 | theorem supportedEquivMvPolynomial_symm_C (s : Set σ) (x : R) :
(supportedEquivMvPolynomial s).symm (C x) = algebraMap R (supported R s) x := by |
ext1
simp [supportedEquivMvPolynomial, MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.WithBot
#align_import data.set.image from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι ι' : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_empty Set.preimage_empty
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
#align set.preimage_congr Set.preimage_congr
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
#align set.preimage_mono Set.preimage_mono
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_univ Set.preimage_univ
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
#align set.subset_preimage_univ Set.subset_preimage_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_inter Set.preimage_inter
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_union Set.preimage_union
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_compl Set.preimage_compl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_diff Set.preimage_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_symm_diff Set.preimage_symmDiff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_ite Set.preimage_ite
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_set_of_eq Set.preimage_setOf_eq
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id_eq Set.preimage_id_eq
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id Set.preimage_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_id' Set.preimage_id'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
#align set.preimage_const_of_mem Set.preimage_const_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
#align set.preimage_const_of_not_mem Set.preimage_const_of_not_mem
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
#align set.preimage_const Set.preimage_const
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_comp Set.preimage_comp
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
#align set.preimage_comp_eq Set.preimage_comp_eq
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction' n with n ih; · simp
rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
#align set.preimage_iterate_eq Set.preimage_iterate_eq
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
#align set.preimage_preimage Set.preimage_preimage
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
#align set.eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff Set.eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
#align set.preimage_singleton_true Set.preimage_singleton_true
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
#align set.preimage_singleton_false Set.preimage_singleton_false
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
#align set.preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl Set.preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
-- Porting note: `Set.image` is already defined in `Init.Set`
#align set.image Set.image
@[deprecated mem_image (since := "2024-03-23")]
theorem mem_image_iff_bex {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {y : β} :
y ∈ f '' s ↔ ∃ (x : _) (_ : x ∈ s), f x = y :=
bex_def.symm
#align set.mem_image_iff_bex Set.mem_image_iff_bex
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
#align set.image_eta Set.image_eta
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
#align function.injective.mem_set_image Function.Injective.mem_set_image
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
#align set.ball_image_iff Set.forall_mem_image
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
#align set.bex_image_iff Set.exists_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias ball_image_iff := forall_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias bex_image_iff := exists_mem_image
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias ⟨_, ball_image_of_ball⟩ := forall_mem_image
#align set.ball_image_of_ball Set.ball_image_of_ball
@[deprecated forall_mem_image (since := "2024-02-21")]
theorem mem_image_elim {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {C : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → C (f x)) :
∀ {y : β}, y ∈ f '' s → C y := forall_mem_image.2 h _
#align set.mem_image_elim Set.mem_image_elim
@[deprecated forall_mem_image (since := "2024-02-21")]
theorem mem_image_elim_on {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {C : β → Prop} {y : β} (h_y : y ∈ f '' s)
(h : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → C (f x)) : C y := forall_mem_image.2 h _ h_y
#align set.mem_image_elim_on Set.mem_image_elim_on
-- Porting note: used to be `safe`
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
ext x
exact exists_congr fun a ↦ and_congr_right fun ha ↦ by rw [h a ha]
#align set.image_congr Set.image_congr
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
#align set.image_congr' Set.image_congr'
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
#align set.image_comp Set.image_comp
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
#align set.image_image Set.image_image
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
#align set.image_comm Set.image_comm
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
#align function.semiconj.set_image Function.Semiconj.set_image
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
#align function.commute.set_image Function.Commute.set_image
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
#align set.image_subset Set.image_subset
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
#align set.monotone_image Set.monotone_image
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
#align set.image_union Set.image_union
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align set.image_empty Set.image_empty
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
#align set.image_inter_subset Set.image_inter_subset
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
#align set.image_inter_on Set.image_inter_on
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
#align set.image_inter Set.image_inter
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
#align set.image_univ_of_surjective Set.image_univ_of_surjective
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
#align set.image_singleton Set.image_singleton
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty.image_const Set.Nonempty.image_const
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
#align set.image_eq_empty Set.image_eq_empty
-- Porting note: `compl` is already defined in `Init.Set`
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
#align set.preimage_compl_eq_image_compl Set.preimage_compl_eq_image_compl
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
#align set.mem_compl_image Set.mem_compl_image
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
#align set.image_id' Set.image_id'
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
#align set.image_id Set.image_id
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
#align set.compl_compl_image Set.compl_compl_image
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
#align set.image_insert_eq Set.image_insert_eq
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
#align set.image_pair Set.image_pair
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
#align set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse Set.image_subset_preimage_of_inverse
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
#align set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse Set.preimage_subset_image_of_inverse
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
#align set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Set.image_eq_preimage_of_inverse
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
#align set.mem_image_iff_of_inverse Set.mem_image_iff_of_inverse
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
#align set.image_compl_subset Set.image_compl_subset
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
#align set.subset_image_compl Set.subset_image_compl
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
#align set.image_compl_eq Set.image_compl_eq
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
#align set.subset_image_diff Set.subset_image_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
#align set.subset_image_symm_diff Set.subset_image_symmDiff
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
#align set.image_diff Set.image_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
#align set.image_symm_diff Set.image_symmDiff
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
#align set.nonempty.image Set.Nonempty.image
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
#align set.nonempty.of_image Set.Nonempty.of_image
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
#align set.nonempty_image_iff Set.image_nonempty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-06")] alias nonempty_image_iff := image_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
#align set.nonempty.preimage Set.Nonempty.preimage
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
#align set.image_subset_iff Set.image_subset_iff
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
#align set.image_preimage_subset Set.image_preimage_subset
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
#align set.subset_preimage_image Set.subset_preimage_image
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
#align set.preimage_image_eq Set.preimage_image_eq
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
#align set.image_preimage_eq Set.image_preimage_eq
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.intro
fun eq => by rw [← image_preimage_eq s hf, ← image_preimage_eq t hf, eq]
fun eq => eq ▸ rfl
#align set.preimage_eq_preimage Set.preimage_eq_preimage
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.image_inter_preimage Set.image_inter_preimage
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
#align set.image_preimage_inter Set.image_preimage_inter
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
#align set.image_inter_nonempty_iff Set.image_inter_nonempty_iff
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
#align set.image_diff_preimage Set.image_diff_preimage
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
#align set.compl_image Set.compl_image
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
#align set.compl_image_set_of Set.compl_image_set_of
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
#align set.inter_preimage_subset Set.inter_preimage_subset
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
#align set.union_preimage_subset Set.union_preimage_subset
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
#align set.subset_image_union Set.subset_image_union
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.preimage_subset_iff Set.preimage_subset_iff
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
#align set.image_eq_image Set.image_eq_image
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
#align set.image_subset_image_iff Set.image_subset_image_iff
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
#align set.prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image Set.prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
#align set.exists_image_iff Set.exists_image_iff
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
#align set.image_factorization_eq Set.imageFactorization_eq
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align set.surjective_onto_image Set.surjective_onto_image
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
#align set.image_perm Set.image_perm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
#align set.powerset_insert Set.powerset_insert
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
#align set.forall_range_iff Set.forall_mem_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-21")] alias forall_range_iff := forall_mem_range
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H i => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
#align set.forall_subtype_range_iff Set.forall_subtype_range_iff
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
#align set.exists_range_iff Set.exists_range_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-10")]
alias exists_range_iff' := exists_range_iff
#align set.exists_range_iff' Set.exists_range_iff'
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
#align set.exists_subtype_range_iff Set.exists_subtype_range_iff
theorem range_iff_surjective : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
#align set.range_iff_surjective Set.range_iff_surjective
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_iff_surjective
#align function.surjective.range_eq Function.Surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 693 | 695 | theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by |
ext
simp [image, range]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Alexander Bentkamp. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alexander Bentkamp, Eric Wieser, Jeremy Avigad, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Invertible
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.PosDef
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.schur_complement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a176cb1219e300e85793d44583dede42377b51af"
/-! # 2×2 block matrices and the Schur complement
This file proves properties of 2×2 block matrices `[A B; C D]` that relate to the Schur complement
`D - C*A⁻¹*B`.
Some of the results here generalize to 2×2 matrices in a category, rather than just a ring. A few
results in this direction can be found in the file `CateogryTheory.Preadditive.Biproducts`,
especially the declarations `CategoryTheory.Biprod.gaussian` and `CategoryTheory.Biprod.isoElim`.
Compare with `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁`, `Matrix.det_fromBlocks₂₂`: determinant of a block matrix in terms of
the Schur complement.
* `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq`, `Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq`: the inverse of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁`, `Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂`: invertibility of a
block triangular matrix.
* `Matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm`: the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**.
* `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₁₁` and `Matrix.PosSemidef.fromBlocks₂₂`: If a matrix `A` is
positive definite, then `[A B; Bᴴ D]` is postive semidefinite if and only if `D - Bᴴ A⁻¹ B` is
postive semidefinite.
-/
variable {l m n α : Type*}
namespace Matrix
open scoped Matrix
section CommRing
variable [Fintype l] [Fintype m] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n]
variable [CommRing α]
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible top-left corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix l m α)
(D : Matrix l n α) [Invertible A] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 0 (C * ⅟ A) 1 * fromBlocks A 0 0 (D - C * ⅟ A * B) *
fromBlocks 1 (⅟ A * B) 0 1 := by
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, zero_add,
Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_self_assoc,
Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, Matrix.mul_assoc, add_sub_cancel]
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁
/-- LDU decomposition of a block matrix with an invertible bottom-right corner, using the
Schur complement. -/
theorem fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ (A : Matrix l m α) (B : Matrix l n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
fromBlocks A B C D =
fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 * fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D *
fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 :=
(Matrix.reindex (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)).injective <| by
simpa [reindex_apply, Equiv.sumComm_symm, ← submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n m), ←
submatrix_mul_equiv _ _ _ (Equiv.sumComm n l), Equiv.sumComm_apply,
fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap] using fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ D C B A
#align matrix.from_blocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ Matrix.fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂
section Triangular
/-! #### Block triangular matrices -/
/-- An upper-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D)) <| by
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, add_right_neg,
fromBlocks_one]
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible
/-- A lower-block-triangular matrix is invertible if its diagonal is. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] : Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A))
(⅟ D)) <| by -- a symmetry argument is more work than just copying the proof
simp_rw [fromBlocks_multiply, Matrix.mul_zero, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, add_zero,
Matrix.neg_mul, invOf_mul_self, Matrix.mul_invOf_mul_self_cancel, add_left_neg,
fromBlocks_one]
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks_zero₂₁_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq
theorem invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible A] [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = fromBlocks (⅟ A) 0 (-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks_zero₁₂_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible upper-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A B 0 D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A B 0 D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.zero_mul, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible
/-- Both diagonal entries of an invertible lower-block-triangular matrix are invertible (by reading
off the diagonal entries of the inverse). -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
[Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D)] : Invertible A × Invertible D where
fst :=
invertibleOfRightInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₁₁ <| by
have := mul_invOf_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₁₁ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₁₁, Matrix.zero_mul, add_zero, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
snd :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)).toBlocks₂₂ <| by
have := invOf_mul_self (fromBlocks A 0 C D)
rw [← fromBlocks_toBlocks (⅟ (fromBlocks A 0 C D)), fromBlocks_multiply] at this
replace := congr_arg Matrix.toBlocks₂₂ this
simpa only [Matrix.toBlocks_fromBlocks₂₂, Matrix.mul_zero, zero_add, ← fromBlocks_one] using
this
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₂₁_invertible_equiv Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv
/-- `invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible` form
an equivalence. -/
def fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
Invertible (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ≃ Invertible A × Invertible D where
toFun _ := invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
invFun i := by
letI := i.1
letI := i.2
exact fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
left_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _ := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.from_blocks_zero₁₂_invertible_equiv Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv
/-- An upper block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₂₁InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_zero₂₁ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁
/-- A lower block-triangular matrix is invertible iff both elements of its diagonal are.
This is a propositional form of `Matrix.fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv` forms an `iff`. -/
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) ↔ IsUnit A ∧ IsUnit D := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit, ← nonempty_prod,
(fromBlocksZero₁₂InvertibleEquiv _ _ _).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_zero₁₂ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂
/-- An expression for the inverse of an upper block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A B 0 D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ (-(A⁻¹ * B * D⁻¹)) 0 D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible A B D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A B 0 D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₂₁.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
#align matrix.inv_from_blocks_zero₂₁_of_is_unit_iff Matrix.inv_fromBlocks_zero₂₁_of_isUnit_iff
/-- An expression for the inverse of a lower block-triangular matrix, when either both elements of
diagonal are invertible, or both are not. -/
theorem inv_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_of_isUnit_iff (A : Matrix m m α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α)
(hAD : IsUnit A ↔ IsUnit D) :
(fromBlocks A 0 C D)⁻¹ = fromBlocks A⁻¹ 0 (-(D⁻¹ * C * A⁻¹)) D⁻¹ := by
by_cases hA : IsUnit A
· have hD := hAD.mp hA
cases hA.nonempty_invertible
cases hD.nonempty_invertible
letI := fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible A C D
simp_rw [← invOf_eq_nonsing_inv, invOf_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_eq]
· have hD := hAD.not.mp hA
have : ¬IsUnit (fromBlocks A 0 C D) :=
isUnit_fromBlocks_zero₁₂.not.mpr (not_and'.mpr fun _ => hA)
simp_rw [nonsing_inv_eq_ring_inverse, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hA, Ring.inverse_non_unit _ hD,
Ring.inverse_non_unit _ this, Matrix.zero_mul, neg_zero, fromBlocks_zero]
#align matrix.inv_from_blocks_zero₁₂_of_is_unit_iff Matrix.inv_fromBlocks_zero₁₂_of_isUnit_iff
end Triangular
/-! ### 2×2 block matrices -/
section Block
/-! #### General 2×2 block matrices-/
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the bottom right corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- factor `fromBlocks` via `fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂`, and state the inverse we expect
convert Invertible.copy' _ _ (fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ _ _ _ _) _
· -- the product is invertible because all the factors are
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
refine Invertible.mul ?_ (fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _)
exact
Invertible.mul (fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
(fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _)
· -- unfold the `Invertible` instances to get the raw factors
show
_ =
fromBlocks 1 0 (-(1 * (⅟ D * C) * 1)) 1 *
(fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * 0 * ⅟ D)) 0 (⅟ D) *
fromBlocks 1 (-(1 * (B * ⅟ D) * 1)) 0 1)
-- combine into a single block matrix
simp only [fromBlocks_multiply, invOf_one, Matrix.one_mul, Matrix.mul_one, Matrix.zero_mul,
Matrix.mul_zero, add_zero, zero_add, neg_zero, Matrix.mul_neg, Matrix.neg_mul, neg_neg, ←
Matrix.mul_assoc, add_comm (⅟D)]
#align matrix.from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.fromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- A block matrix is invertible if the top left corner and the corresponding schur complement
is. -/
def fromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) := by
-- we argue by symmetry
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
letI iDCBA :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks D C B A) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
exact
iDCBA.copy' _
(fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
(fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
#align matrix.from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.fromBlocks₁₁Invertible
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₂₂_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C)) (-(⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D))
(-(⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C))) (⅟ D + ⅟ D * C * ⅟ (A - B * ⅟ D * C) * B * ⅟ D) := by
letI := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks₂₂_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks₂₂_eq
theorem invOf_fromBlocks₁₁_eq (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B)]
[Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) =
fromBlocks (⅟ A + ⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A) (-(⅟ A * B * ⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)))
(-(⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B) * C * ⅟ A)) (⅟ (D - C * ⅟ A * B)) := by
letI := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D
convert (rfl : ⅟ (fromBlocks A B C D) = _)
#align matrix.inv_of_from_blocks₁₁_eq Matrix.invOf_fromBlocks₁₁_eq
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
suffices Invertible (fromBlocks (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 0 D) by
exact (invertibleOfFromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) 0 D).1
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
letI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
letI iDC : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 0 (⅟ D * C) 1 : Matrix (Sum m n) (Sum m n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₁₂Invertible _ _ _
letI iBD : Invertible (fromBlocks 1 (B * ⅟ D) 0 1 : Matrix (Sum m n) (Sum m n) α) :=
fromBlocksZero₂₁Invertible _ _ _
letI iBDC := Invertible.copy ‹_› _ (fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₂₂ A B C D).symm
refine (iBD.mulLeft _).symm ?_
exact (iDC.mulRight _).symm iBDC
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- If a block matrix is invertible and so is its bottom left element, then so is the corresponding
Schur complement. -/
def invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] [Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D)] :
Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
-- another symmetry argument
letI iABCD' :=
submatrixEquivInvertible (fromBlocks A B C D) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _)
letI iDCBA := iABCD'.copy _ (fromBlocks_submatrix_sum_swap_sum_swap _ _ _ _).symm
exact invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible D C B A
#align matrix.invertible_of_from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₂₂Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (A - B * ⅟ D * C) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₂₂Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_from_blocks₂₂_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible
/-- `Matrix.invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible` and `Matrix.fromBlocks₁₁Invertible` as an
equivalence. -/
def invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
Invertible (fromBlocks A B C D) ≃ Invertible (D - C * ⅟ A * B) where
toFun _iABCD := invertibleOfFromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
invFun _i_schur := fromBlocks₁₁Invertible _ _ _ _
left_inv _iABCD := Subsingleton.elim _ _
right_inv _i_schur := Subsingleton.elim _ _
#align matrix.invertible_equiv_from_blocks₁₁_invertible Matrix.invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible
/-- If the bottom-left element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible D] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₂₂Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₂₂
/-- If the top-right element of a block matrix is invertible, then the whole matrix is invertible
iff the corresponding schur complement is. -/
theorem isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁ {A : Matrix m m α} {B : Matrix m n α}
{C : Matrix n m α} {D : Matrix n n α} [Invertible A] :
IsUnit (fromBlocks A B C D) ↔ IsUnit (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
simp only [← nonempty_invertible_iff_isUnit,
(invertibleEquivFromBlocks₁₁Invertible A B C D).nonempty_congr]
#align matrix.is_unit_from_blocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁ Matrix.isUnit_fromBlocks_iff_of_invertible₁₁
end Block
/-! ### Lemmas about `Matrix.det` -/
section Det
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible top left element in terms of
the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₁₁ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible A] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det A * det (D - C * ⅟ A * B) := by
rw [fromBlocks_eq_of_invertible₁₁ (A := A), det_mul, det_mul, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁,
det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_fromBlocks_zero₁₂, det_one, det_one, one_mul, one_mul, mul_one]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks₁₁
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₁₁ (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) (D : Matrix n n α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks 1 B C D).det = det (D - C * B) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix m m α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₁₁, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks_one₁₁ Matrix.det_fromBlocks_one₁₁
/-- Determinant of a 2×2 block matrix, expanded around an invertible bottom right element in terms
of the Schur complement. -/
theorem det_fromBlocks₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α)
(D : Matrix n n α) [Invertible D] :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C D).det = det D * det (A - B * ⅟ D * C) := by
have : fromBlocks A B C D =
(fromBlocks D C B A).submatrix (Equiv.sumComm _ _) (Equiv.sumComm _ _) := by
ext (i j)
cases i <;> cases j <;> rfl
rw [this, det_submatrix_equiv_self, det_fromBlocks₁₁]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks₂₂ Matrix.det_fromBlocks₂₂
@[simp]
theorem det_fromBlocks_one₂₂ (A : Matrix m m α) (B : Matrix m n α) (C : Matrix n m α) :
(Matrix.fromBlocks A B C 1).det = det (A - B * C) := by
haveI : Invertible (1 : Matrix n n α) := invertibleOne
rw [det_fromBlocks₂₂, invOf_one, Matrix.mul_one, det_one, one_mul]
#align matrix.det_from_blocks_one₂₂ Matrix.det_fromBlocks_one₂₂
/-- The **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity**. Note the `1` on the LHS is of shape m×m, while the `1` on
the RHS is of shape n×n. -/
theorem det_one_add_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 + A * B) = det (1 + B * A) :=
calc
det (1 + A * B) = det (fromBlocks 1 (-A) B 1) := by
rw [det_fromBlocks_one₂₂, Matrix.neg_mul, sub_neg_eq_add]
_ = det (1 + B * A) := by rw [det_fromBlocks_one₁₁, Matrix.mul_neg, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm Matrix.det_one_add_mul_comm
/-- Alternate statement of the **Weinstein–Aronszajn identity** -/
theorem det_mul_add_one_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (A * B + 1) = det (B * A + 1) := by rw [add_comm, det_one_add_mul_comm, add_comm]
#align matrix.det_mul_add_one_comm Matrix.det_mul_add_one_comm
theorem det_one_sub_mul_comm (A : Matrix m n α) (B : Matrix n m α) :
det (1 - A * B) = det (1 - B * A) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← Matrix.neg_mul, det_one_add_mul_comm, Matrix.mul_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
#align matrix.det_one_sub_mul_comm Matrix.det_one_sub_mul_comm
/-- A special case of the **Matrix determinant lemma** for when `A = I`. -/
theorem det_one_add_col_mul_row (u v : m → α) : det (1 + col u * row v) = 1 + v ⬝ᵥ u := by
rw [det_one_add_mul_comm, det_unique, Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, Matrix.one_apply_eq,
Matrix.row_mul_col_apply]
#align matrix.det_one_add_col_mul_row Matrix.det_one_add_col_mul_row
/-- The **Matrix determinant lemma**
TODO: show the more general version without `hA : IsUnit A.det` as
`(A + col u * row v).det = A.det + v ⬝ᵥ (adjugate A) *ᵥ u`.
-/
theorem det_add_col_mul_row {A : Matrix m m α} (hA : IsUnit A.det) (u v : m → α) :
(A + col u * row v).det = A.det * (1 + row v * A⁻¹ * col u).det := by
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (col u * row v),
← Matrix.mul_add, det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm,
← Matrix.mul_assoc]
/-- A generalization of the **Matrix determinant lemma** -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SchurComplement.lean | 462 | 467 | theorem det_add_mul {A : Matrix m m α} (U : Matrix m n α)
(V : Matrix n m α) (hA : IsUnit A.det) :
(A + U * V).det = A.det * (1 + V * A⁻¹ * U).det := by |
nth_rewrite 1 [← Matrix.mul_one A]
rwa [← Matrix.mul_nonsing_inv_cancel_left A (U * V), ← Matrix.mul_add,
det_mul, ← Matrix.mul_assoc, det_one_add_mul_comm, ← Matrix.mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Category.Preorder
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.EpiMono
import Mathlib.Topology.Sets.Opens
#align_import topology.category.Top.opens from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d39590fc8728fbf6743249802486f8c91ffe07bc"
/-!
# The category of open sets in a topological space.
We define `toTopCat : Opens X ⥤ TopCat` and
`map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X`, given by taking preimages of open sets.
Unfortunately `Opens` isn't (usefully) a functor `TopCat ⥤ Cat`.
(One can in fact define such a functor,
but using it results in unresolvable `Eq.rec` terms in goals.)
Really it's a 2-functor from (spaces, continuous functions, equalities)
to (categories, functors, natural isomorphisms).
We don't attempt to set up the full theory here, but do provide the natural isomorphisms
`mapId : map (𝟙 X) ≅ 𝟭 (opens X)` and
`mapComp : map (f ≫ g) ≅ map g ⋙ map f`.
Beyond that, there's a collection of simp lemmas for working with these constructions.
-/
open CategoryTheory TopologicalSpace Opposite
universe u
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
variable {X Y Z : TopCat.{u}}
/-!
Since `Opens X` has a partial order, it automatically receives a `Category` instance.
Unfortunately, because we do not allow morphisms in `Prop`,
the morphisms `U ⟶ V` are not just proofs `U ≤ V`, but rather
`ULift (PLift (U ≤ V))`.
-/
instance opensHomHasCoeToFun {U V : Opens X} : CoeFun (U ⟶ V) fun _ => U → V :=
⟨fun f x => ⟨x, f.le x.2⟩⟩
#align topological_space.opens.opens_hom_has_coe_to_fun TopologicalSpace.Opens.opensHomHasCoeToFun
/-!
We now construct as morphisms various inclusions of open sets.
-/
-- This is tedious, but necessary because we decided not to allow Prop as morphisms in a category...
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLELeft (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ U :=
inf_le_left.hom
#align topological_space.opens.inf_le_left TopologicalSpace.Opens.infLELeft
/-- The inclusion `U ⊓ V ⟶ V` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def infLERight (U V : Opens X) : U ⊓ V ⟶ V :=
inf_le_right.hom
#align topological_space.opens.inf_le_right TopologicalSpace.Opens.infLERight
/-- The inclusion `U i ⟶ supr U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leSupr {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) : U i ⟶ iSup U :=
(le_iSup U i).hom
#align topological_space.opens.le_supr TopologicalSpace.Opens.leSupr
/-- The inclusion `⊥ ⟶ U` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def botLE (U : Opens X) : ⊥ ⟶ U :=
bot_le.hom
#align topological_space.opens.bot_le TopologicalSpace.Opens.botLE
/-- The inclusion `U ⟶ ⊤` as a morphism in the category of open sets.
-/
noncomputable def leTop (U : Opens X) : U ⟶ ⊤ :=
le_top.hom
#align topological_space.opens.le_top TopologicalSpace.Opens.leTop
-- We do not mark this as a simp lemma because it breaks open `x`.
-- Nevertheless, it is useful in `SheafOfFunctions`.
theorem infLELeft_apply (U V : Opens X) (x) :
(infLELeft U V) x = ⟨x.1, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) x.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.inf_le_left_apply TopologicalSpace.Opens.infLELeft_apply
@[simp]
theorem infLELeft_apply_mk (U V : Opens X) (x) (m) :
(infLELeft U V) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (@inf_le_left _ _ U V : _ ≤ _) m⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.inf_le_left_apply_mk TopologicalSpace.Opens.infLELeft_apply_mk
@[simp]
theorem leSupr_apply_mk {ι : Type*} (U : ι → Opens X) (i : ι) (x) (m) :
(leSupr U i) ⟨x, m⟩ = ⟨x, (le_iSup U i : _) m⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.le_supr_apply_mk TopologicalSpace.Opens.leSupr_apply_mk
/-- The functor from open sets in `X` to `Top`,
realising each open set as a topological space itself.
-/
def toTopCat (X : TopCat.{u}) : Opens X ⥤ TopCat where
obj U := ⟨U, inferInstance⟩
map i :=
⟨fun x => ⟨x.1, i.le x.2⟩,
(Embedding.continuous_iff embedding_subtype_val).2 continuous_induced_dom⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align topological_space.opens.to_Top TopologicalSpace.Opens.toTopCat
@[simp]
theorem toTopCat_map (X : TopCat.{u}) {U V : Opens X} {f : U ⟶ V} {x} {h} :
((toTopCat X).map f) ⟨x, h⟩ = ⟨x, f.le h⟩ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align topological_space.opens.to_Top_map TopologicalSpace.Opens.toTopCat_map
/-- The inclusion map from an open subset to the whole space, as a morphism in `TopCat`.
-/
@[simps (config := .asFn)]
def inclusion {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : (toTopCat X).obj U ⟶ X where
toFun := _
continuous_toFun := continuous_subtype_val
#align topological_space.opens.inclusion TopologicalSpace.Opens.inclusion
@[simp]
theorem coe_inclusion {X : TopCat} {U : Opens X} :
(inclusion U : U → X) = Subtype.val := rfl
theorem openEmbedding {X : TopCat.{u}} (U : Opens X) : OpenEmbedding (inclusion U) :=
IsOpen.openEmbedding_subtype_val U.2
#align topological_space.opens.open_embedding TopologicalSpace.Opens.openEmbedding
/-- The inclusion of the top open subset (i.e. the whole space) is an isomorphism.
-/
def inclusionTopIso (X : TopCat.{u}) : (toTopCat X).obj ⊤ ≅ X where
hom := inclusion ⊤
inv := ⟨fun x => ⟨x, trivial⟩, continuous_def.2 fun U ⟨_, hS, hSU⟩ => hSU ▸ hS⟩
#align topological_space.opens.inclusion_top_iso TopologicalSpace.Opens.inclusionTopIso
/-- `Opens.map f` gives the functor from open sets in Y to open set in X,
given by taking preimages under f. -/
def map (f : X ⟶ Y) : Opens Y ⥤ Opens X where
obj U := ⟨f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y), U.isOpen.preimage f.continuous⟩
map i := ⟨⟨fun x h => i.le h⟩⟩
#align topological_space.opens.map TopologicalSpace.Opens.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (f : X ⟶ Y) (U : Opens Y) : ((map f).obj U : Set X) = f ⁻¹' (U : Set Y) :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.map_coe TopologicalSpace.Opens.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_obj (f : X ⟶ Y) (U) (p) : (map f).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨f ⁻¹' U, p.preimage f.continuous⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.map_obj TopologicalSpace.Opens.map_obj
@[simp]
theorem map_id_obj (U : Opens X) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj U = U :=
let ⟨_, _⟩ := U
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.map_id_obj TopologicalSpace.Opens.map_id_obj
@[simp 1100]
theorem map_id_obj' (U) (p) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj ⟨U, p⟩ = ⟨U, p⟩ :=
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.map_id_obj' TopologicalSpace.Opens.map_id_obj'
@[simp 1100]
theorem map_id_obj_unop (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).obj (unop U) = unop U :=
let ⟨_, _⟩ := U.unop
rfl
#align topological_space.opens.map_id_obj_unop TopologicalSpace.Opens.map_id_obj_unop
@[simp 1100]
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Opens.lean | 184 | 184 | theorem op_map_id_obj (U : (Opens X)ᵒᵖ) : (map (𝟙 X)).op.obj U = U := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
#align_import topology.metric_space.isometry from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b1859b6d4636fdbb78c5d5cefd24530653cfd3eb"
/-!
# Isometries
We define isometries, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that preserve
the edistance (on metric spaces, these are exactly the maps that preserve distances),
and prove their basic properties. We also introduce isometric bijections.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoMetricSpace` and we specialize to `MetricSpace` when needed.
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
open Function Set
open scoped Topology ENNReal
/-- An isometry (also known as isometric embedding) is a map preserving the edistance
between pseudoemetric spaces, or equivalently the distance between pseudometric space. -/
def Isometry [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ x1 x2 : α, edist (f x1) (f x2) = edist x1 x2
#align isometry Isometry
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves nonnegative
distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_nndist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, nndist (f x) (f y) = nndist x y := by
simp only [Isometry, edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_inj]
#align isometry_iff_nndist_eq isometry_iff_nndist_eq
/-- On pseudometric spaces, a map is an isometry if and only if it preserves distances. -/
theorem isometry_iff_dist_eq [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β} :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x y, dist (f x) (f y) = dist x y := by
simp only [isometry_iff_nndist_eq, ← coe_nndist, NNReal.coe_inj]
#align isometry_iff_dist_eq isometry_iff_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.dist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
#align isometry.dist_eq Isometry.dist_eq
/-- A map that preserves distances is an isometry -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_dist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_dist_eq
#align isometry.of_dist_eq Isometry.of_dist_eq
/-- An isometry preserves non-negative distances. -/
alias ⟨Isometry.nndist_eq, _⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
#align isometry.nndist_eq Isometry.nndist_eq
/-- A map that preserves non-negative distances is an isometry. -/
alias ⟨_, Isometry.of_nndist_eq⟩ := isometry_iff_nndist_eq
#align isometry.of_nndist_eq Isometry.of_nndist_eq
namespace Isometry
section PseudoEmetricIsometry
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {f : α → β} {x y z : α} {s : Set α}
/-- An isometry preserves edistances. -/
theorem edist_eq (hf : Isometry f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) = edist x y :=
hf x y
#align isometry.edist_eq Isometry.edist_eq
theorem lipschitz (h : Isometry f) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun x y => (h x y).le
#align isometry.lipschitz Isometry.lipschitz
theorem antilipschitz (h : Isometry f) : AntilipschitzWith 1 f := fun x y => by
simp only [h x y, ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, le_refl]
#align isometry.antilipschitz Isometry.antilipschitz
/-- Any map on a subsingleton is an isometry -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem _root_.isometry_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : Isometry f := fun x y => by
rw [Subsingleton.elim x y]; simp
#align isometry_subsingleton isometry_subsingleton
/-- The identity is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_id : Isometry (id : α → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
#align isometry_id isometry_id
theorem prod_map {δ} [PseudoEMetricSpace δ] {f : α → β} {g : γ → δ} (hf : Isometry f)
(hg : Isometry g) : Isometry (Prod.map f g) := fun x y => by
simp only [Prod.edist_eq, hf.edist_eq, hg.edist_eq, Prod.map_apply]
#align isometry.prod_map Isometry.prod_map
theorem _root_.isometry_dcomp {ι} [Fintype ι] {α β : ι → Type*} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)]
[∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (β i)] (f : ∀ i, α i → β i) (hf : ∀ i, Isometry (f i)) :
Isometry (fun g : (i : ι) → α i => fun i => f i (g i)) := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_pi_def, (hf _).edist_eq]
#align isometry_dcomp isometry_dcomp
/-- The composition of isometries is an isometry. -/
theorem comp {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Isometry g) (hf : Isometry f) : Isometry (g ∘ f) :=
fun _ _ => (hg _ _).trans (hf _ _)
#align isometry.comp Isometry.comp
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform continuous map -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : Isometry f) : UniformContinuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_continuous Isometry.uniformContinuous
/-- An isometry from a metric space is a uniform inducing map -/
protected theorem uniformInducing (hf : Isometry f) : UniformInducing f :=
hf.antilipschitz.uniformInducing hf.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_inducing Isometry.uniformInducing
theorem tendsto_nhds_iff {ι : Type*} {f : α → β} {g : ι → α} {a : Filter ι} {b : α}
(hf : Isometry f) : Filter.Tendsto g a (𝓝 b) ↔ Filter.Tendsto (f ∘ g) a (𝓝 (f b)) :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.tendsto_nhds_iff
#align isometry.tendsto_nhds_iff Isometry.tendsto_nhds_iff
/-- An isometry is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : Isometry f) : Continuous f :=
hf.lipschitz.continuous
#align isometry.continuous Isometry.continuous
/-- The right inverse of an isometry is an isometry. -/
theorem right_inv {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h : Isometry f) (hg : RightInverse g f) : Isometry g :=
fun x y => by rw [← h, hg _, hg _]
#align isometry.right_inv Isometry.right_inv
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall (f x) r = EMetric.closedBall x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_emetric_closed_ball Isometry.preimage_emetric_closedBall
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
f ⁻¹' EMetric.ball (f x) r = EMetric.ball x r := by
ext y
simp [h.edist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_emetric_ball Isometry.preimage_emetric_ball
/-- Isometries preserve the diameter in pseudoemetric spaces. -/
theorem ediam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (f '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp only [EMetric.diam_le_iff, forall_mem_image, hf.edist_eq]
#align isometry.ediam_image Isometry.ediam_image
theorem ediam_range (hf : Isometry f) : EMetric.diam (range f) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.ediam_image univ
#align isometry.ediam_range Isometry.ediam_range
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.ball x r) (EMetric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_ball x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_emetric_ball Isometry.mapsTo_emetric_ball
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (EMetric.closedBall x r) (EMetric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_emetric_closedBall x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_emetric_closed_ball Isometry.mapsTo_emetric_closedBall
/-- The injection from a subtype is an isometry -/
theorem _root_.isometry_subtype_coe {s : Set α} : Isometry ((↑) : s → α) := fun _ _ => rfl
#align isometry_subtype_coe isometry_subtype_coe
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (f ∘ g) s ↔ ContinuousOn g s :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.continuousOn_iff.symm
#align isometry.comp_continuous_on_iff Isometry.comp_continuousOn_iff
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Isometry f) {g : γ → α} :
Continuous (f ∘ g) ↔ Continuous g :=
hf.uniformInducing.inducing.continuous_iff.symm
#align isometry.comp_continuous_iff Isometry.comp_continuous_iff
end PseudoEmetricIsometry
--section
section EmetricIsometry
variable [EMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is injective -/
protected theorem injective (h : Isometry f) : Injective f :=
h.antilipschitz.injective
#align isometry.injective Isometry.injective
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is a uniform embedding -/
protected theorem uniformEmbedding (hf : Isometry f) : UniformEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.uniformEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.uniform_embedding Isometry.uniformEmbedding
/-- An isometry from an emetric space is an embedding -/
protected theorem embedding (hf : Isometry f) : Embedding f :=
hf.uniformEmbedding.embedding
#align isometry.embedding Isometry.embedding
/-- An isometry from a complete emetric space is a closed embedding -/
theorem closedEmbedding [CompleteSpace α] [EMetricSpace γ] {f : α → γ} (hf : Isometry f) :
ClosedEmbedding f :=
hf.antilipschitz.closedEmbedding hf.lipschitz.uniformContinuous
#align isometry.closed_embedding Isometry.closedEmbedding
end EmetricIsometry
--section
section PseudoMetricIsometry
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
/-- An isometry preserves the diameter in pseudometric spaces. -/
theorem diam_image (hf : Isometry f) (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (f '' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [Metric.diam, Metric.diam, hf.ediam_image]
#align isometry.diam_image Isometry.diam_image
theorem diam_range (hf : Isometry f) : Metric.diam (range f) = Metric.diam (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← image_univ]
exact hf.diam_image univ
#align isometry.diam_range Isometry.diam_range
theorem preimage_setOf_dist (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (p : ℝ → Prop) :
f ⁻¹' { y | p (dist y (f x)) } = { y | p (dist y x) } := by
ext y
simp [hf.dist_eq]
#align isometry.preimage_set_of_dist Isometry.preimage_setOf_dist
theorem preimage_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (f x) r = Metric.closedBall x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· ≤ r)
#align isometry.preimage_closed_ball Isometry.preimage_closedBall
theorem preimage_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.ball (f x) r = Metric.ball x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· < r)
#align isometry.preimage_ball Isometry.preimage_ball
theorem preimage_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
f ⁻¹' Metric.sphere (f x) r = Metric.sphere x r :=
hf.preimage_setOf_dist x (· = r)
#align isometry.preimage_sphere Isometry.preimage_sphere
theorem mapsTo_ball (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.ball x r) (Metric.ball (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_ball x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_ball Isometry.mapsTo_ball
theorem mapsTo_sphere (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.sphere x r) (Metric.sphere (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_sphere x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_sphere Isometry.mapsTo_sphere
theorem mapsTo_closedBall (hf : Isometry f) (x : α) (r : ℝ) :
MapsTo f (Metric.closedBall x r) (Metric.closedBall (f x) r) :=
(hf.preimage_closedBall x r).ge
#align isometry.maps_to_closed_ball Isometry.mapsTo_closedBall
end PseudoMetricIsometry
-- section
end Isometry
-- namespace
/-- A uniform embedding from a uniform space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem UniformEmbedding.to_isometry {α β} [UniformSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : UniformEmbedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
#align uniform_embedding.to_isometry UniformEmbedding.to_isometry
/-- An embedding from a topological space to a metric space is an isometry with respect to the
induced metric space structure on the source space. -/
theorem Embedding.to_isometry {α β} [TopologicalSpace α] [MetricSpace β] {f : α → β}
(h : Embedding f) : (letI := h.comapMetricSpace f; Isometry f) :=
let _ := h.comapMetricSpace f
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun _ _ => rfl
#align embedding.to_isometry Embedding.to_isometry
-- such a bijection need not exist
/-- `α` and `β` are isometric if there is an isometric bijection between them. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): was @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure IsometryEquiv (α : Type u) (β : Type v) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
extends α ≃ β where
isometry_toFun : Isometry toFun
#align isometry_equiv IsometryEquiv
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:25 " ≃ᵢ " => IsometryEquiv
namespace IsometryEquiv
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add `IsometryEquivClass`
theorem toEquiv_injective : Injective (toEquiv : (α ≃ᵢ β) → (α ≃ β))
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align isometry_equiv.to_equiv_inj IsometryEquiv.toEquiv_injective
@[simp] theorem toEquiv_inj {e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ β} : e₁.toEquiv = e₂.toEquiv ↔ e₁ = e₂ :=
toEquiv_injective.eq_iff
instance : EquivLike (α ≃ᵢ β) α β where
coe e := e.toEquiv
inv e := e.toEquiv.symm
left_inv e := e.left_inv
right_inv e := e.right_inv
coe_injective' _ _ h _ := toEquiv_injective <| DFunLike.ext' h
theorem coe_eq_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (a : α) : h a = h.toEquiv a := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_eq_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.coe_eq_toEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_toEquiv (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toEquiv = h := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.coe_toEquiv
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (e : α ≃ β) (h) : ⇑(mk e h) = e := rfl
protected theorem isometry (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Isometry h :=
h.isometry_toFun
#align isometry_equiv.isometry IsometryEquiv.isometry
protected theorem bijective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Bijective h :=
h.toEquiv.bijective
#align isometry_equiv.bijective IsometryEquiv.bijective
protected theorem injective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Injective h :=
h.toEquiv.injective
#align isometry_equiv.injective IsometryEquiv.injective
protected theorem surjective (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Surjective h :=
h.toEquiv.surjective
#align isometry_equiv.surjective IsometryEquiv.surjective
protected theorem edist_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x y : α) : edist (h x) (h y) = edist x y :=
h.isometry.edist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.edist_eq IsometryEquiv.edist_eq
protected theorem dist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : dist (h x) (h y) = dist x y :=
h.isometry.dist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.dist_eq IsometryEquiv.dist_eq
protected theorem nndist_eq {α β : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
(x y : α) : nndist (h x) (h y) = nndist x y :=
h.isometry.nndist_eq x y
#align isometry_equiv.nndist_eq IsometryEquiv.nndist_eq
protected theorem continuous (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : Continuous h :=
h.isometry.continuous
#align isometry_equiv.continuous IsometryEquiv.continuous
@[simp]
theorem ediam_image (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set α) : EMetric.diam (h '' s) = EMetric.diam s :=
h.isometry.ediam_image s
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_image IsometryEquiv.ediam_image
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃h₁ h₂ : α ≃ᵢ β⦄ (H : ∀ x, h₁ x = h₂ x) : h₁ = h₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
#align isometry_equiv.ext IsometryEquiv.ext
/-- Alternative constructor for isometric bijections,
taking as input an isometry, and a right inverse. -/
def mk' {α : Type u} [EMetricSpace α] (f : α → β) (g : β → α) (hfg : ∀ x, f (g x) = x)
(hf : Isometry f) : α ≃ᵢ β where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv _ := hf.injective <| hfg _
right_inv := hfg
isometry_toFun := hf
#align isometry_equiv.mk' IsometryEquiv.mk'
/-- The identity isometry of a space. -/
protected def refl (α : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] : α ≃ᵢ α :=
{ Equiv.refl α with isometry_toFun := isometry_id }
#align isometry_equiv.refl IsometryEquiv.refl
/-- The composition of two isometric isomorphisms, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def trans (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) : α ≃ᵢ γ :=
{ Equiv.trans h₁.toEquiv h₂.toEquiv with
isometry_toFun := h₂.isometry_toFun.comp h₁.isometry_toFun }
#align isometry_equiv.trans IsometryEquiv.trans
@[simp]
theorem trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : α) : h₁.trans h₂ x = h₂ (h₁ x) :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.trans_apply IsometryEquiv.trans_apply
/-- The inverse of an isometric isomorphism, as an isometric isomorphism. -/
protected def symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β ≃ᵢ α where
isometry_toFun := h.isometry.right_inv h.right_inv
toEquiv := h.toEquiv.symm
#align isometry_equiv.symm IsometryEquiv.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α → β := h
#align isometry_equiv.simps.apply IsometryEquiv.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : β → α :=
h.symm
#align isometry_equiv.simps.symm_apply IsometryEquiv.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections IsometryEquiv (toEquiv_toFun → apply, toEquiv_invFun → symm_apply)
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : h.symm.symm = h := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.symm_symm IsometryEquiv.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Bijective (IsometryEquiv.symm : (α ≃ᵢ β) → β ≃ᵢ α) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (y : β) : h (h.symm y) = y :=
h.toEquiv.apply_symm_apply y
#align isometry_equiv.apply_symm_apply IsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem symm_apply_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) : h.symm (h x) = x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.symm_apply_apply IsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply
theorem symm_apply_eq (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : h.symm y = x ↔ y = h x :=
h.toEquiv.symm_apply_eq
#align isometry_equiv.symm_apply_eq IsometryEquiv.symm_apply_eq
theorem eq_symm_apply (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {x : α} {y : β} : x = h.symm y ↔ h x = y :=
h.toEquiv.eq_symm_apply
#align isometry_equiv.eq_symm_apply IsometryEquiv.eq_symm_apply
theorem symm_comp_self (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h.symm : β → α) ∘ h = id := funext h.left_inv
#align isometry_equiv.symm_comp_self IsometryEquiv.symm_comp_self
theorem self_comp_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : (h : α → β) ∘ h.symm = id := funext h.right_inv
#align isometry_equiv.self_comp_symm IsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : range h = univ :=
h.toEquiv.range_eq_univ
#align isometry_equiv.range_eq_univ IsometryEquiv.range_eq_univ
theorem image_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : image h.symm = preimage h :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.symm.toEquiv.left_inv h.symm.toEquiv.right_inv
#align isometry_equiv.image_symm IsometryEquiv.image_symm
theorem preimage_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : preimage h.symm = image h :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h.toEquiv.left_inv h.toEquiv.right_inv).symm
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_symm IsometryEquiv.preimage_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_trans_apply (h₁ : α ≃ᵢ β) (h₂ : β ≃ᵢ γ) (x : γ) :
(h₁.trans h₂).symm x = h₁.symm (h₂.symm x) :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.symm_trans_apply IsometryEquiv.symm_trans_apply
theorem ediam_univ (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : EMetric.diam (univ : Set α) = EMetric.diam (univ : Set β) := by
rw [← h.range_eq_univ, h.isometry.ediam_range]
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_univ IsometryEquiv.ediam_univ
@[simp]
theorem ediam_preimage (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (s : Set β) : EMetric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = EMetric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, ediam_image]
#align isometry_equiv.ediam_preimage IsometryEquiv.ediam_preimage
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_emetric_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem preimage_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h ⁻¹' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_emetric_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_emetric_closed_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_emetric_closedBall
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.ball x r = EMetric.ball (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_ball, symm_symm]
#align isometry_equiv.image_emetric_ball IsometryEquiv.image_emetric_ball
@[simp]
theorem image_emetric_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
h '' EMetric.closedBall x r = EMetric.closedBall (h x) r := by
rw [← h.preimage_symm, h.symm.preimage_emetric_closedBall, symm_symm]
#align isometry_equiv.image_emetric_closed_ball IsometryEquiv.image_emetric_closedBall
/-- The (bundled) homeomorphism associated to an isometric isomorphism. -/
@[simps toEquiv]
protected def toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : α ≃ₜ β where
continuous_toFun := h.continuous
continuous_invFun := h.symm.continuous
toEquiv := h.toEquiv
#align isometry_equiv.to_homeomorph IsometryEquiv.toHomeomorph
#align isometry_equiv.to_homeomorph_to_equiv IsometryEquiv.toHomeomorph_toEquiv
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph = h :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph IsometryEquiv.coe_toHomeomorph
@[simp]
theorem coe_toHomeomorph_symm (h : α ≃ᵢ β) : ⇑h.toHomeomorph.symm = h.symm :=
rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_to_homeomorph_symm IsometryEquiv.coe_toHomeomorph_symm
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuousOn_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} {s : Set γ} :
ContinuousOn (h ∘ f) s ↔ ContinuousOn f s :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuousOn_iff _ _
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_on_iff IsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : γ → α} :
Continuous (h ∘ f) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_iff IsometryEquiv.comp_continuous_iff
@[simp]
theorem comp_continuous_iff' {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] (h : α ≃ᵢ β) {f : β → γ} :
Continuous (f ∘ h) ↔ Continuous f :=
h.toHomeomorph.comp_continuous_iff'
#align isometry_equiv.comp_continuous_iff' IsometryEquiv.comp_continuous_iff'
/-- The group of isometries. -/
instance : Group (α ≃ᵢ α) where
one := IsometryEquiv.refl _
mul e₁ e₂ := e₂.trans e₁
inv := IsometryEquiv.symm
mul_assoc e₁ e₂ e₃ := rfl
one_mul e := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_one e := ext fun _ => rfl
mul_left_inv e := ext e.symm_apply_apply
@[simp] theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : α ≃ᵢ α) = id := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_one IsometryEquiv.coe_one
@[simp] theorem coe_mul (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) : ⇑(e₁ * e₂) = e₁ ∘ e₂ := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.coe_mul IsometryEquiv.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (e₁ e₂ : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : (e₁ * e₂) x = e₁ (e₂ x) := rfl
#align isometry_equiv.mul_apply IsometryEquiv.mul_apply
@[simp] theorem inv_apply_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e⁻¹ (e x) = x := e.symm_apply_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.inv_apply_self IsometryEquiv.inv_apply_self
@[simp] theorem apply_inv_self (e : α ≃ᵢ α) (x : α) : e (e⁻¹ x) = x := e.apply_symm_apply x
#align isometry_equiv.apply_inv_self IsometryEquiv.apply_inv_self
theorem completeSpace_iff (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α ↔ CompleteSpace β := by
simp only [completeSpace_iff_isComplete_univ, ← e.range_eq_univ, ← image_univ,
isComplete_image_iff e.isometry.uniformInducing]
#align isometry_equiv.complete_space_iff IsometryEquiv.completeSpace_iff
protected theorem completeSpace [CompleteSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵢ β) : CompleteSpace α :=
e.completeSpace_iff.2 ‹_›
#align isometry_equiv.complete_space IsometryEquiv.completeSpace
variable (ι α)
/-- `Equiv.funUnique` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def funUnique [Unique ι] [Fintype ι] : (ι → α) ≃ᵢ α where
toEquiv := Equiv.funUnique ι α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Finset.univ_unique, Finset.sup_singleton]
#align isometry_equiv.fun_unique IsometryEquiv.funUnique
/-- `piFinTwoEquiv` as an `IsometryEquiv`. -/
@[simps!]
def piFinTwo (α : Fin 2 → Type*) [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] : (∀ i, α i) ≃ᵢ α 0 × α 1 where
toEquiv := piFinTwoEquiv α
isometry_toFun x hx := by simp [edist_pi_def, Fin.univ_succ, Prod.edist_eq]
#align isometry_equiv.pi_fin_two IsometryEquiv.piFinTwo
end PseudoEMetricSpace
section PseudoMetricSpace
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] (h : α ≃ᵢ β)
@[simp]
theorem diam_image (s : Set α) : Metric.diam (h '' s) = Metric.diam s :=
h.isometry.diam_image s
#align isometry_equiv.diam_image IsometryEquiv.diam_image
@[simp]
theorem diam_preimage (s : Set β) : Metric.diam (h ⁻¹' s) = Metric.diam s := by
rw [← image_symm, diam_image]
#align isometry_equiv.diam_preimage IsometryEquiv.diam_preimage
theorem diam_univ : Metric.diam (univ : Set α) = Metric.diam (univ : Set β) :=
congr_arg ENNReal.toReal h.ediam_univ
#align isometry_equiv.diam_univ IsometryEquiv.diam_univ
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ball (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.ball x r = Metric.ball (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_ball (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_ball IsometryEquiv.preimage_ball
@[simp]
theorem preimage_sphere (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.sphere x r = Metric.sphere (h.symm x) r := by
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_sphere (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
#align isometry_equiv.preimage_sphere IsometryEquiv.preimage_sphere
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Isometry.lean | 620 | 622 | theorem preimage_closedBall (h : α ≃ᵢ β) (x : β) (r : ℝ) :
h ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall x r = Metric.closedBall (h.symm x) r := by |
rw [← h.isometry.preimage_closedBall (h.symm x) r, h.apply_symm_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
#align_import measure_theory.function.locally_integrable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"08a4542bec7242a5c60f179e4e49de8c0d677b1b"
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.mono MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.norm MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.norm
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
#align measure_theory.integrable_on.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.integrable_on_is_compact MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.integrable_on_compact_subset MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is either open, or closed, then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is integrable on
every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] [T2Space X] (hs : IsClosed s ∨ IsOpen s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → (IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ) := by
-- The correct condition is that `s` be *locally closed*, i.e. for every `x ∈ s` there is some
-- `U ∈ 𝓝 x` such that `U ∩ s` is closed. But mathlib doesn't have locally closed sets yet.
refine ⟨fun hf k hk => hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx => ?_⟩
cases hs with
| inl hs =>
exact
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s h2K,
hf _ inter_subset_left
(hK.of_isClosed_subset (hs.inter hK.isClosed) inter_subset_right)⟩
| inr hs =>
obtain ⟨K, hK, h2K, h3K⟩ := exists_compact_subset hs hx
refine ⟨K, ?_, hf K h3K hK⟩
simpa only [IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq hs hx, interior_eq_nhds'] using h2K
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_iff MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_univ MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_univ
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.locally_integrable_on MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
#align measure_theory.integrable.locally_integrable MeasureTheory.Integrable.locallyIntegrable
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_of_locally_integrable_restrict MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_iff_locally_integrable_restrict MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.integrable_on_is_compact MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.integrable_on_nhds_is_compact MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_iff MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrable_iff
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by
rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem Memℒp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩
refine ⟨U, hU, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, ← memℒp_one_iff_integrable]
apply (hf.restrict U).memℒp_of_exponent_le hp
theorem locallyIntegrable_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ :=
(memℒp_top_const c).locallyIntegrable le_top
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_const MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrable_const
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_const [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c : E) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ => c) s μ :=
(locallyIntegrable_const c).locallyIntegrableOn s
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable_on_const MeasureTheory.locallyIntegrableOn_const
theorem locallyIntegrable_zero : LocallyIntegrable (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) μ :=
(integrable_zero X E μ).locallyIntegrable
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_zero : LocallyIntegrableOn (fun _ ↦ (0 : E)) s μ :=
locallyIntegrable_zero.locallyIntegrableOn s
theorem LocallyIntegrable.indicator (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {s : Set X}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : LocallyIntegrable (s.indicator f) μ := by
intro x
rcases hf x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
exact ⟨U, hU, h'U.indicator hs⟩
#align measure_theory.locally_integrable.indicator MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable.indicator
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 308 | 320 | theorem locallyIntegrable_map_homeomorph [BorelSpace X] [BorelSpace Y] (e : X ≃ₜ Y) {f : Y → E}
{μ : Measure X} : LocallyIntegrable f (Measure.map e μ) ↔ LocallyIntegrable (f ∘ e) μ := by |
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x => ?_⟩
· rcases h (e x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e ⁻¹' U, e.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
exact (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).1 h'U
· rcases h (e.symm x) with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
refine ⟨e.symm ⁻¹' U, e.symm.continuous.continuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds hU, ?_⟩
apply (integrableOn_map_equiv e.toMeasurableEquiv).2
simp only [Homeomorph.toMeasurableEquiv_coe]
convert h'U
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, Homeomorph.symm_apply_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Rotations by oriented angles.
This file defines rotations by oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.rotation` is the rotation by an oriented angle with respect to an orientation.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
/-- Auxiliary construction to build a rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
/-- A rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear map) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear equiv) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
/-- The inverse of `rotation` is rotation by the negation of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
/-- Rotation by 0 is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
/-- Rotation by π / 2 is the "right-angle-rotation" map `J`. -/
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
#align orientation.rotation_rotation Orientation.rotation_rotation
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_trans Orientation.rotation_trans
/-- Rotating the first of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos θ - sin θ * I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rotation_left
/-- Negating a rotation is equivalent to rotation by π plus the angle. -/
theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
#align orientation.neg_rotation Orientation.neg_rotation
/-- Negating a rotation by -π / 2 is equivalent to rotation by π / 2. -/
@[simp]
theorem neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two (x : V) :
-o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x := by
rw [neg_rotation, ← Real.Angle.coe_add, neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half]
#align orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two
/-- Negating a rotation by π / 2 is equivalent to rotation by -π / 2. -/
theorem neg_rotation_pi_div_two (x : V) : -o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) x = o.rotation (-π / 2 : ℝ) x :=
(neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mp <| o.neg_rotation_neg_pi_div_two _).symm
#align orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.neg_rotation_pi_div_two
/-- Rotating the first of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos (-θ) + sin (-θ) * I`.
-/
theorem kahler_rotation_left' (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = (-θ).expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [Real.Angle.expMapCircle_neg, coe_inv_circle_eq_conj, kahler_rotation_left]
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left' Orientation.kahler_rotation_left'
/-- Rotating the second of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos θ + sin θ * I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_right (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler x (o.rotation θ y) = θ.expMapCircle * o.kahler x y := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, real_smul,
kahler_rightAngleRotation_right, Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_right Orientation.kahler_rotation_right
/-- Rotating the first vector by `θ` subtracts `θ` from the angle between two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) y = o.oangle x y - θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_left']
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_left Orientation.oangle_rotation_left
/-- Rotating the second vector by `θ` adds `θ` to the angle between two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_rotation_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle x (o.rotation θ y) = o.oangle x y + θ := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_rotation_right]
rw [Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, Real.Angle.arg_expMapCircle]
· abel
· exact ne_zero_of_mem_circle _
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
#align orientation.oangle_rotation_right Orientation.oangle_rotation_right
/-- The rotation of a vector by `θ` has an angle of `-θ` from that vector. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 248 | 249 | theorem oangle_rotation_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.oangle (o.rotation θ x) x = -θ := by | simp [hx]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Lp
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Trim
#align_import measure_theory.function.conditional_expectation.ae_measurable from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d8bbb04e2d2a44596798a9207ceefc0fb236e41e"
/-! # Functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-σ-algebra
A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different.
We define `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ`, the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to an `m`-strongly
measurable function.
## Main statements
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of `lpMeas`.
`Lp.induction_stronglyMeasurable` (see also `Memℒp.induction_stronglyMeasurable`):
To prove something for an `Lp` function a.e. strongly measurable with respect to a
sub-σ-algebra `m` in a normed space, it suffices to show that
* the property holds for (multiples of) characteristic functions which are measurable w.r.t. `m`;
* is closed under addition;
* the set of functions in `Lp` strongly measurable w.r.t. `m` for which the property holds is
closed.
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A function `f` verifies `AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ` if it is `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. This is similar to `AEStronglyMeasurable`, but the
`MeasurableSpace` structures used for the measurability statement and for the measure are
different. -/
def AEStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] (m : MeasurableSpace α)
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∃ g : α → β, StronglyMeasurable[m] g ∧ f =ᵐ[μ] g
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'
namespace AEStronglyMeasurable'
variable {α β 𝕜 : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace β]
{f g : α → β}
theorem congr (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ := by
obtain ⟨f', hf'_meas, hff'⟩ := hf; exact ⟨f', hf'_meas, hfg.symm.trans hff'⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.congr MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr
theorem mono {m'} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hm : m ≤ m') :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m' f μ :=
let ⟨f', hf'_meas, hff'⟩ := hf; ⟨f', hf'_meas.mono hm, hff'⟩
theorem add [Add β] [ContinuousAdd β] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (f + g) μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨f', h_f'_meas, hff'⟩
rcases hg with ⟨g', h_g'_meas, hgg'⟩
exact ⟨f' + g', h_f'_meas.add h_g'_meas, hff'.add hgg'⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.add MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.add
theorem neg [AddGroup β] [TopologicalAddGroup β] {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (-f) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
refine ⟨-f', hf'_meas.neg, hf_ae.mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.neg_apply]
rw [hx]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.neg MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.neg
theorem sub [AddGroup β] [TopologicalAddGroup β] {f g : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ)
(hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (f - g) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
rcases hgm with ⟨g', hg'_meas, hg_ae⟩
refine ⟨f' - g', hf'_meas.sub hg'_meas, hf_ae.mp (hg_ae.mono fun x hx1 hx2 => ?_)⟩
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply]
rw [hx1, hx2]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.sub MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.sub
theorem const_smul [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (c : 𝕜) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (c • f) μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨f', h_f'_meas, hff'⟩
refine ⟨c • f', h_f'_meas.const_smul c, ?_⟩
exact EventuallyEq.fun_comp hff' fun x => c • x
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.const_smul MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.const_smul
theorem const_inner {𝕜 β} [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup β] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 β] {f : α → β}
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (c : β) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m (fun x => (inner c (f x) : 𝕜)) μ := by
rcases hfm with ⟨f', hf'_meas, hf_ae⟩
refine
⟨fun x => (inner c (f' x) : 𝕜), (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ c).inner hf'_meas,
hf_ae.mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
dsimp only
rw [hx]
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.const_inner MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.const_inner
/-- An `m`-strongly measurable function almost everywhere equal to `f`. -/
noncomputable def mk (f : α → β) (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : α → β :=
hfm.choose
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.mk
theorem stronglyMeasurable_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) :
StronglyMeasurable[m] (hfm.mk f) :=
hfm.choose_spec.1
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.stronglyMeasurable_mk
theorem ae_eq_mk {f : α → β} (hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : f =ᵐ[μ] hfm.mk f :=
hfm.choose_spec.2
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.ae_eq_mk MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.ae_eq_mk
theorem continuous_comp {γ} [TopologicalSpace γ] {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} (hg : Continuous g)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m (g ∘ f) μ :=
⟨fun x => g (hf.mk _ x),
@Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m _ _ _ _ hg hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk,
hf.ae_eq_mk.mono fun x hx => by rw [Function.comp_apply, hx]⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.continuous_comp MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.continuous_comp
end AEStronglyMeasurable'
theorem aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim {α β} {m m0 m0' : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] (hm0 : m0 ≤ m0') {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f (μ.trim hm0)) : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg_meas, hfg⟩ := hf; exact ⟨g, hg_meas, ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim hfg⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'_of_ae_strongly_measurable'_trim MeasureTheory.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim
theorem StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable' {α β} {m _ : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ :=
⟨f, hf, ae_eq_refl _⟩
#align measure_theory.strongly_measurable.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aeStronglyMeasurable' {α β} [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f g : α → β} (hm : m ≤ m0)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hgm : AEStronglyMeasurable' m g μ) :
hfm.mk f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] hgm.mk g ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g :=
(ae_eq_trim_iff hm hfm.stronglyMeasurable_mk hgm.stronglyMeasurable_mk).trans
⟨fun h => hfm.ae_eq_mk.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk.symm), fun h =>
hfm.ae_eq_mk.symm.trans (h.trans hgm.ae_eq_mk)⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_trim_iff_of_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.ae_eq_trim_iff_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_ae_measurable' {α β γ : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β]
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} {f : α → β} {μ : Measure γ} {g : γ → α}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.map g)) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' (mα.comap g) (f ∘ g) μ :=
⟨hf.mk f ∘ g, hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.comp_measurable (measurable_iff_comap_le.mpr le_rfl),
ae_eq_comp hg hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable.comp_ae_measurable' MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_ae_measurable'
/-- If the restriction to a set `s` of a σ-algebra `m` is included in the restriction to `s` of
another σ-algebra `m₂` (hypothesis `hs`), the set `s` is `m` measurable and a function `f` almost
everywhere supported on `s` is `m`-ae-strongly-measurable, then `f` is also
`m₂`-ae-strongly-measurable. -/
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable'.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_measurableSpace_le_on {α E}
{m m₂ m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [TopologicalSpace E] [Zero E] (hm : m ≤ m0)
{s : Set α} {f : α → E} (hs_m : MeasurableSet[m] s)
(hs : ∀ t, MeasurableSet[m] (s ∩ t) → MeasurableSet[m₂] (s ∩ t))
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ) (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict sᶜ] 0) :
AEStronglyMeasurable' m₂ f μ := by
have h_ind_eq : s.indicator (hf.mk f) =ᵐ[μ] f := by
refine Filter.EventuallyEq.trans ?_ <|
indicator_ae_eq_of_restrict_compl_ae_eq_zero (hm _ hs_m) hf_zero
filter_upwards [hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp [hxs, hx]
· simp [hxs]
suffices StronglyMeasurable[m₂] (s.indicator (hf.mk f)) from
AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr this.aeStronglyMeasurable' h_ind_eq
have hf_ind : StronglyMeasurable[m] (s.indicator (hf.mk f)) :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_mk.indicator hs_m
exact
hf_ind.stronglyMeasurable_of_measurableSpace_le_on hs_m hs fun x hxs =>
Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs _
#align measure_theory.ae_strongly_measurable'.ae_strongly_measurable'_of_measurable_space_le_on MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable'.aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_measurableSpace_le_on
variable {α E' F F' 𝕜 : Type*} {p : ℝ≥0∞} [RCLike 𝕜]
-- 𝕜 for ℝ or ℂ
-- E' for an inner product space on which we compute integrals
[NormedAddCommGroup E']
[InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'] [CompleteSpace E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E']
-- F for a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
-- F' for integrals on a Lp submodule
[NormedAddCommGroup F']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [CompleteSpace F']
section LpMeas
/-! ## The subset `lpMeas` of `Lp` functions a.e. measurable with respect to a sub-sigma-algebra -/
variable (F)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeasSubgroup (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
AddSubgroup (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
neg_mem' {f} hf := AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr hf.neg (Lp.coeFn_neg f).symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroup
variable (𝕜)
/-- `lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ` is the subspace of `Lp F p μ` containing functions `f` verifying
`AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ`, i.e. functions which are `μ`-a.e. equal to
an `m`-strongly measurable function. -/
def lpMeas (m : MeasurableSpace α) [MeasurableSpace α] (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
Submodule 𝕜 (Lp F p μ) where
carrier := {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ}
zero_mem' := ⟨(0 : α → F), @stronglyMeasurable_zero _ _ m _ _, Lp.coeFn_zero _ _ _⟩
add_mem' {f g} hf hg := (hf.add hg).congr (Lp.coeFn_add f g).symm
smul_mem' c f hf := (hf.const_smul c).congr (Lp.coeFn_smul c f).symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas MeasureTheory.lpMeas
variable {F 𝕜}
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
rw [← AddSubgroup.mem_carrier, lpMeasSubgroup, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_subgroup_iff_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable' {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
{f : Lp F p μ} : f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, ← Submodule.mem_carrier, lpMeas, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_iff_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable' {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable' (β := F) m f μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas.ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.lpMeas.aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem mem_lpMeas_self {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : Lp F p μ) :
f ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m0 p μ :=
mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mpr (Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f)
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_self MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_self
theorem lpMeasSubgroup_coe {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ} :
(f : _ → _) = (f : Lp F p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_coe MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroup_coe
theorem lpMeas_coe {m _ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ} :
(f : _ → _) = (f : Lp F p μ) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_coe MeasureTheory.lpMeas_coe
theorem mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) {c : F} :
indicatorConstLp p (hm s hs) hμs c ∈ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨s.indicator fun _ : α => c, (@stronglyMeasurable_const _ _ m _ _).indicator hs,
indicatorConstLp_coeFn⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_indicator_const_Lp MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeas_indicatorConstLp
section CompleteSubspace
/-! ## The subspace `lpMeas` is complete.
We define an `IsometryEquiv` between `lpMeasSubgroup` and the `Lp` space corresponding to the
measure `μ.trim hm`. As a consequence, the completeness of `Lp` implies completeness of
`lpMeasSubgroup` (and `lpMeas`). -/
variable {ι : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- If `f` belongs to `lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`, then the measurable function it is almost
everywhere equal to (given by `AEMeasurable.mk`) belongs to `ℒp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`. -/
theorem memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p μ)
(hf_meas : f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
Memℒp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp hf_meas).choose p (μ.trim hm) := by
have hf : AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ :=
mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp hf_meas
let g := hf.choose
obtain ⟨hg, hfg⟩ := hf.choose_spec
change Memℒp g p (μ.trim hm)
refine ⟨hg.aestronglyMeasurable, ?_⟩
have h_snorm_fg : snorm g p (μ.trim hm) = snorm f p μ := by
rw [snorm_trim hm hg]
exact snorm_congr_ae hfg.symm
rw [h_snorm_fg]
exact Lp.snorm_lt_top f
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_trim_of_mem_Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup
/-- If `f` belongs to `Lp` for the measure `μ.trim hm`, then it belongs to the subgroup
`lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ`. -/
theorem mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f ∈ lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ := by
let hf_mem_ℒp := memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)
rw [mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable']
refine AEStronglyMeasurable'.congr ?_ (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp hf_mem_ℒp).symm
refine aeStronglyMeasurable'_of_aeStronglyMeasurable'_trim hm ?_
exact Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f
#align measure_theory.mem_Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_of_trim MeasureTheory.mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim
variable (F p μ)
/-- Map from `lpMeasSubgroup` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
Memℒp.toLp (mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose
-- Porting note: had to replace `f` with `f.1` here.
(memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim
variable (𝕜)
/-- Map from `lpMeas` to `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)`. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasToLpTrim (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) : Lp F p (μ.trim hm) :=
Memℒp.toLp (mem_lpMeas_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose
-- Porting note: had to replace `f` with `f.1` here.
(memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrim
variable {𝕜}
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeasSubgroup`, inverse of
`lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ :=
⟨(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_subgroup MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup
variable (𝕜)
/-- Map from `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` to `lpMeas`, inverse of `Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim`. -/
noncomputable def lpTrimToLpMeas (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
⟨(memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f)).toLp f, mem_lpMeasSubgroup_toLp_of_trim hm f⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeas
variable {F 𝕜 p μ}
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: replaced `(↑f)` with `f.1` here.
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq
theorem lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: filled in the argument
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f))
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_subgroup_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq
theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: replaced `(↑f)` with `f.1` here.
(ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim (Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_trim_of_mem_lpMeasSubgroup hm f.1 f.mem))).trans
(mem_lpMeasSubgroup_iff_aeStronglyMeasurable'.mp f.mem).choose_spec.2.symm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq
theorem lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : Lp F p (μ.trim hm)) :
lpTrimToLpMeas F 𝕜 p μ hm f =ᵐ[μ] f :=
-- Porting note: filled in the argument
Memℒp.coeFn_toLp (memℒp_of_memℒp_trim hm (Lp.memℒp f))
#align measure_theory.Lp_trim_to_Lp_meas_ae_eq MeasureTheory.lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a right inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.RightInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
refine
ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_
exact (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_right_inv MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv
/-- `lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup` is a left inverse of `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim`. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Function.LeftInverse (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm) (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) := by
intro f
ext1
ext1
rw [← lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
exact (lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup_ae_eq hm _).trans (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_left_inv MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f + g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f + lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).add (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _)
refine (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine
EventuallyEq.trans ?_
(EventuallyEq.add (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm
(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm g).symm)
refine (Lp.coeFn_add _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
filter_upwards with x using rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_add MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (-f) = -lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_neg _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact @StronglyMeasurable.neg _ _ _ m _ _ _ (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _)
refine (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (EventuallyEq.neg (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm)
refine (Lp.coeFn_neg _).trans ?_
simp_rw [lpMeasSubgroup_coe]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => by rfl
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_neg MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub (hm : m ≤ m0) (f g : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) :
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm (f - g) =
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f - lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm g := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, sub_eq_add_neg, lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add,
lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_neg]
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_sub MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub
theorem lpMeasToLpTrim_smul (hm : m ≤ m0) (c : 𝕜) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) :
lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm (c • f) = c • lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm f := by
ext1
refine EventuallyEq.trans ?_ (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).symm
refine ae_eq_trim_of_stronglyMeasurable hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _) ?_ ?_
· exact (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _).const_smul c
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
refine (Lp.coeFn_smul _ _).trans ?_
refine (lpMeasToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).mono fun x hx => ?_
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, hx]
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim_smul MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrim_smul
/-- `lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim` preserves the norm. -/
theorem lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0)
(f : lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) : ‖lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
rw [Lp.norm_def, snorm_trim hm (Lp.stronglyMeasurable _),
snorm_congr_ae (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm _), lpMeasSubgroup_coe, ← Lp.norm_def]
congr
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_norm_map MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map
theorem isometry_lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
Isometry (lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm) :=
Isometry.of_dist_eq fun f g => by
rw [dist_eq_norm, ← lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_sub, lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map,
dist_eq_norm]
#align measure_theory.isometry_Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim MeasureTheory.isometry_lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim
variable (F p μ)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup` and `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` are isometric. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrimIso [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ≃ᵢ Lp F p (μ.trim hm) where
toFun := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm
invFun := lpTrimToLpMeasSubgroup F p μ hm
left_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv hm
right_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv hm
isometry_toFun := isometry_lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim hm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_trim_iso MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrimIso
variable (𝕜)
/-- `lpMeasSubgroup` and `lpMeas` are isometric. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasSubgroupToLpMeasIso [Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ ≃ᵢ lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ :=
IsometryEquiv.refl (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ)
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_subgroup_to_Lp_meas_iso MeasureTheory.lpMeasSubgroupToLpMeasIso
/-- `lpMeas` and `Lp F p (μ.trim hm)` are isometric, with a linear equivalence. -/
noncomputable def lpMeasToLpTrimLie [Fact (1 ≤ p)] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] Lp F p (μ.trim hm) where
toFun := lpMeasToLpTrim F 𝕜 p μ hm
invFun := lpTrimToLpMeas F 𝕜 p μ hm
left_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_left_inv hm
right_inv := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_right_inv hm
map_add' := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_add hm
map_smul' := lpMeasToLpTrim_smul hm
norm_map' := lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_norm_map hm
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim_lie MeasureTheory.lpMeasToLpTrimLie
variable {F 𝕜 p μ}
instance [hm : Fact (m ≤ m0)] [CompleteSpace F] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
CompleteSpace (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ) := by
rw [(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrimIso F p μ hm.elim).completeSpace_iff]; infer_instance
-- For now just no-lint this; lean4's tree-based logging will make this easier to debug.
-- One possible change might be to generalize `𝕜` from `RCLike` to `NormedField`, as this
-- result may well hold there.
-- Porting note: removed @[nolint fails_quickly]
instance [hm : Fact (m ≤ m0)] [CompleteSpace F] [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] :
CompleteSpace (lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) := by
rw [(lpMeasSubgroupToLpMeasIso F 𝕜 p μ).symm.completeSpace_iff]; infer_instance
theorem isComplete_aeStronglyMeasurable' [hp : Fact (1 ≤ p)] [CompleteSpace F] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
IsComplete {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ} := by
rw [← completeSpace_coe_iff_isComplete]
haveI : Fact (m ≤ m0) := ⟨hm⟩
change CompleteSpace (lpMeasSubgroup F m p μ)
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.is_complete_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.isComplete_aeStronglyMeasurable'
theorem isClosed_aeStronglyMeasurable' [Fact (1 ≤ p)] [CompleteSpace F] (hm : m ≤ m0) :
IsClosed {f : Lp F p μ | AEStronglyMeasurable' m f μ} :=
IsComplete.isClosed (isComplete_aeStronglyMeasurable' hm)
#align measure_theory.is_closed_ae_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.isClosed_aeStronglyMeasurable'
end CompleteSubspace
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- We do not get `ae_fin_strongly_measurable f (μ.trim hm)`, since we don't have
`f =ᵐ[μ.trim hm] Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim F 𝕜 p μ hm f` but only the weaker
`f =ᵐ[μ] Lp_meas_to_Lp_trim F 𝕜 p μ hm f`. -/
theorem lpMeas.ae_fin_strongly_measurable' (hm : m ≤ m0) (f : lpMeas F 𝕜 m p μ) (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
-- Porting note: changed `f` to `f.1` in the next line. Not certain this is okay.
∃ g, FinStronglyMeasurable g (μ.trim hm) ∧ f.1 =ᵐ[μ] g :=
⟨lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim F p μ hm f, Lp.finStronglyMeasurable _ hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top,
(lpMeasSubgroupToLpTrim_ae_eq hm f).symm⟩
#align measure_theory.Lp_meas.ae_fin_strongly_measurable' MeasureTheory.lpMeas.ae_fin_strongly_measurable'
/-- When applying the inverse of `lpMeasToLpTrimLie` (which takes a function in the Lp space of
the sub-sigma algebra and returns its version in the larger Lp space) to an indicator of the
sub-sigma-algebra, we obtain an indicator in the Lp space of the larger sigma-algebra. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/AEMeasurable.lean | 539 | 549 | theorem lpMeasToLpTrimLie_symm_indicator [one_le_p : Fact (1 ≤ p)] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {hm : m ≤ m0}
{s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s) (hμs : μ.trim hm s ≠ ∞) (c : F) :
((lpMeasToLpTrimLie F ℝ p μ hm).symm (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) : Lp F p μ) =
indicatorConstLp p (hm s hs) ((le_trim hm).trans_lt hμs.lt_top).ne c := by |
ext1
rw [← lpMeas_coe]
change
lpTrimToLpMeas F ℝ p μ hm (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) =ᵐ[μ]
(indicatorConstLp p _ _ c : α → F)
refine (lpTrimToLpMeas_ae_eq hm _).trans ?_
exact (ae_eq_of_ae_eq_trim indicatorConstLp_coeFn).trans indicatorConstLp_coeFn.symm
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Filippo A. E. Nuccio
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure
import Mathlib.RingTheory.FractionalIdeal.Basic
#align_import ring_theory.fractional_ideal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ed90a7d327c3a5caf65a6faf7e8a0d63c4605df7"
/-!
# More operations on fractional ideals
## Main definitions
* `map` is the pushforward of a fractional ideal along an algebra morphism
Let `K` be the localization of `R` at `R⁰ = R \ {0}` (i.e. the field of fractions).
* `FractionalIdeal R⁰ K` is the type of fractional ideals in the field of fractions
* `Div (FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)` instance:
the ideal quotient `I / J` (typically written $I : J$, but a `:` operator cannot be defined)
## Main statement
* `isNoetherian` states that every fractional ideal of a noetherian integral domain is noetherian
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_ideal
## Tags
fractional ideal, fractional ideals, invertible ideal
-/
open IsLocalization Pointwise nonZeroDivisors
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Set Submodule
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {S : Submonoid R} {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
variable [Algebra R P] [loc : IsLocalization S P]
section
variable {P' : Type*} [CommRing P'] [Algebra R P'] [loc' : IsLocalization S P']
variable {P'' : Type*} [CommRing P''] [Algebra R P''] [loc'' : IsLocalization S P'']
theorem _root_.IsFractional.map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') {I : Submodule R P} :
IsFractional S I → IsFractional S (Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I)
| ⟨a, a_nonzero, hI⟩ =>
⟨a, a_nonzero, fun b hb => by
obtain ⟨b', b'_mem, hb'⟩ := Submodule.mem_map.mp hb
rw [AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply] at hb'
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hI b' b'_mem
use x
rw [← g.commutes, hx, g.map_smul, hb']⟩
#align is_fractional.map IsFractional.map
/-- `I.map g` is the pushforward of the fractional ideal `I` along the algebra morphism `g` -/
def map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') : FractionalIdeal S P → FractionalIdeal S P' := fun I =>
⟨Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I, I.isFractional.map g⟩
#align fractional_ideal.map FractionalIdeal.map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_map (g : P →ₐ[R] P') (I : FractionalIdeal S P) :
↑(map g I) = Submodule.map g.toLinearMap I :=
rfl
#align fractional_ideal.coe_map FractionalIdeal.coe_map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {I : FractionalIdeal S P} {g : P →ₐ[R] P'} {y : P'} :
y ∈ I.map g ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ I ∧ g x = y :=
Submodule.mem_map
#align fractional_ideal.mem_map FractionalIdeal.mem_map
variable (I J : FractionalIdeal S P) (g : P →ₐ[R] P')
@[simp]
theorem map_id : I.map (AlgHom.id _ _) = I :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_id (I : Submodule R P))
#align fractional_ideal.map_id FractionalIdeal.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_comp (g' : P' →ₐ[R] P'') : I.map (g'.comp g) = (I.map g).map g' :=
coeToSubmodule_injective (Submodule.map_comp g.toLinearMap g'.toLinearMap I)
#align fractional_ideal.map_comp FractionalIdeal.map_comp
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/FractionalIdeal/Operations.lean | 91 | 98 | theorem map_coeIdeal (I : Ideal R) : (I : FractionalIdeal S P).map g = I := by |
ext x
simp only [mem_coeIdeal]
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨y, hy, (g.commutes y).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, g.commutes y⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
#align_import data.pnat.find from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
/-!
# Explicit least witnesses to existentials on positive natural numbers
Implemented via calling out to `Nat.find`.
-/
namespace PNat
variable {p q : ℕ+ → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q] (h : ∃ n, p n)
instance decidablePredExistsNat : DecidablePred fun n' : ℕ => ∃ (n : ℕ+) (_ : n' = n), p n :=
fun n' =>
decidable_of_iff' (∃ h : 0 < n', p ⟨n', h⟩) <|
Subtype.exists.trans <| by
simp_rw [mk_coe, @exists_comm (_ < _) (_ = _), exists_prop, exists_eq_left']
#align pnat.decidable_pred_exists_nat PNat.decidablePredExistsNat
/-- The `PNat` version of `Nat.findX` -/
protected def findX : { n // p n ∧ ∀ m : ℕ+, m < n → ¬p m } := by
have : ∃ (n' : ℕ) (n : ℕ+) (_ : n' = n), p n := Exists.elim h fun n hn => ⟨n, n, rfl, hn⟩
have n := Nat.findX this
refine ⟨⟨n, ?_⟩, ?_, fun m hm pm => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨n', hn', -⟩ := n.prop.1
rw [hn']
exact n'.prop
· obtain ⟨n', hn', pn'⟩ := n.prop.1
simpa [hn', Subtype.coe_eta] using pn'
· exact n.prop.2 m hm ⟨m, rfl, pm⟩
#align pnat.find_x PNat.findX
/-- If `p` is a (decidable) predicate on `ℕ+` and `hp : ∃ (n : ℕ+), p n` is a proof that
there exists some positive natural number satisfying `p`, then `PNat.find hp` is the
smallest positive natural number satisfying `p`. Note that `PNat.find` is protected,
meaning that you can't just write `find`, even if the `PNat` namespace is open.
The API for `PNat.find` is:
* `PNat.find_spec` is the proof that `PNat.find hp` satisfies `p`.
* `PNat.find_min` is the proof that if `m < PNat.find hp` then `m` does not satisfy `p`.
* `PNat.find_min'` is the proof that if `m` does satisfy `p` then `PNat.find hp ≤ m`.
-/
protected def find : ℕ+ :=
PNat.findX h
#align pnat.find PNat.find
protected theorem find_spec : p (PNat.find h) :=
(PNat.findX h).prop.left
#align pnat.find_spec PNat.find_spec
protected theorem find_min : ∀ {m : ℕ+}, m < PNat.find h → ¬p m :=
@(PNat.findX h).prop.right
#align pnat.find_min PNat.find_min
protected theorem find_min' {m : ℕ+} (hm : p m) : PNat.find h ≤ m :=
le_of_not_lt fun l => PNat.find_min h l hm
#align pnat.find_min' PNat.find_min'
variable {n m : ℕ+}
theorem find_eq_iff : PNat.find h = m ↔ p m ∧ ∀ n < m, ¬p n := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨PNat.find_spec h, fun _ => PNat.find_min h⟩
· rintro ⟨hm, hlt⟩
exact le_antisymm (PNat.find_min' h hm) (not_lt.1 <| imp_not_comm.1 (hlt _) <| PNat.find_spec h)
#align pnat.find_eq_iff PNat.find_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem find_lt_iff (n : ℕ+) : PNat.find h < n ↔ ∃ m < n, p m :=
⟨fun h2 => ⟨PNat.find h, h2, PNat.find_spec h⟩, fun ⟨_, hmn, hm⟩ =>
(PNat.find_min' h hm).trans_lt hmn⟩
#align pnat.find_lt_iff PNat.find_lt_iff
@[simp]
theorem find_le_iff (n : ℕ+) : PNat.find h ≤ n ↔ ∃ m ≤ n, p m := by
simp only [exists_prop, ← lt_add_one_iff, find_lt_iff]
#align pnat.find_le_iff PNat.find_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem le_find_iff (n : ℕ+) : n ≤ PNat.find h ↔ ∀ m < n, ¬p m := by
simp only [← not_lt, find_lt_iff, not_exists, not_and]
#align pnat.le_find_iff PNat.le_find_iff
@[simp]
theorem lt_find_iff (n : ℕ+) : n < PNat.find h ↔ ∀ m ≤ n, ¬p m := by
simp only [← add_one_le_iff, le_find_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align pnat.lt_find_iff PNat.lt_find_iff
@[simp]
theorem find_eq_one : PNat.find h = 1 ↔ p 1 := by simp [find_eq_iff]
#align pnat.find_eq_one PNat.find_eq_one
-- Porting note: deleted `@[simp]` to satisfy the linter because `le_find_iff` is more general
theorem one_le_find : 1 < PNat.find h ↔ ¬p 1 :=
not_iff_not.mp <| by simp
#align pnat.one_le_find PNat.one_le_find
theorem find_mono (h : ∀ n, q n → p n) {hp : ∃ n, p n} {hq : ∃ n, q n} :
PNat.find hp ≤ PNat.find hq :=
PNat.find_min' _ (h _ (PNat.find_spec hq))
#align pnat.find_mono PNat.find_mono
theorem find_le {h : ∃ n, p n} (hn : p n) : PNat.find h ≤ n :=
(PNat.find_le_iff _ _).2 ⟨n, le_rfl, hn⟩
#align pnat.find_le PNat.find_le
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Find.lean | 118 | 124 | theorem find_comp_succ (h : ∃ n, p n) (h₂ : ∃ n, p (n + 1)) (h1 : ¬p 1) :
PNat.find h = PNat.find h₂ + 1 := by |
refine (find_eq_iff _).2 ⟨PNat.find_spec h₂, fun n => PNat.recOn n ?_ ?_⟩
· simp [h1]
intro m _ hm
simp only [add_lt_add_iff_right, lt_find_iff] at hm
exact hm _ le_rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Functor.Multivariate
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Multivariate.M
import Mathlib.Data.QPF.Multivariate.Basic
#align_import data.qpf.multivariate.constructions.cofix from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# The final co-algebra of a multivariate qpf is again a qpf.
For a `(n+1)`-ary QPF `F (α₀,..,αₙ)`, we take the least fixed point of `F` with
regards to its last argument `αₙ`. The result is an `n`-ary functor: `Fix F (α₀,..,αₙ₋₁)`.
Making `Fix F` into a functor allows us to take the fixed point, compose with other functors
and take a fixed point again.
## Main definitions
* `Cofix.mk` - constructor
* `Cofix.dest` - destructor
* `Cofix.corec` - corecursor: useful for formulating infinite, productive computations
* `Cofix.bisim` - bisimulation: proof technique to show the equality of possibly infinite values
of `Cofix F α`
## Implementation notes
For `F` a QPF, we define `Cofix F α` in terms of the M-type of the polynomial functor `P` of `F`.
We define the relation `Mcongr` and take its quotient as the definition of `Cofix F α`.
`Mcongr` is taken as the weakest bisimulation on M-type. See
[avigad-carneiro-hudon2019] for more details.
## Reference
* Jeremy Avigad, Mario M. Carneiro and Simon Hudon.
[*Data Types as Quotients of Polynomial Functors*][avigad-carneiro-hudon2019]
-/
universe u
open MvFunctor
namespace MvQPF
open TypeVec MvPFunctor
open MvFunctor (LiftP LiftR)
variable {n : ℕ} {F : TypeVec.{u} (n + 1) → Type u} [mvf : MvFunctor F] [q : MvQPF F]
/-- `corecF` is used as a basis for defining the corecursor of `Cofix F α`. `corecF`
uses corecursion to construct the M-type generated by `q.P` and uses function on `F`
as a corecursive step -/
def corecF {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) : β → q.P.M α :=
M.corec _ fun x => repr (g x)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mvqpf.corecF MvQPF.corecF
| Mathlib/Data/QPF/Multivariate/Constructions/Cofix.lean | 64 | 66 | theorem corecF_eq {α : TypeVec n} {β : Type u} (g : β → F (α.append1 β)) (x : β) :
M.dest q.P (corecF g x) = appendFun id (corecF g) <$$> repr (g x) := by |
rw [corecF, M.dest_corec]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Jireh Loreaux
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Invertible.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Basic
#align_import group_theory.subsemigroup.center from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1ac8d4304efba9d03fa720d06516fac845aa5353"
/-!
# Centers of magmas and semigroups
## Main definitions
* `Set.center`: the center of a magma
* `Set.addCenter`: the center of an additive magma
See `Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subsemigroup.Center` for the definition of the center as a subsemigroup:
* `Subsemigroup.center`: the center of a semigroup
* `AddSubsemigroup.center`: the center of an additive semigroup
We provide `Submonoid.center`, `AddSubmonoid.center`, `Subgroup.center`, `AddSubgroup.center`,
`Subsemiring.center`, and `Subring.center` in other files.
-/
variable {M : Type*}
/-- Conditions for an element to be additively central -/
structure IsAddCentral [Add M] (z : M) : Prop where
/-- addition commutes -/
comm (a : M) : z + a = a + z
/-- associative property for left addition -/
left_assoc (b c : M) : z + (b + c) = (z + b) + c
/-- middle associative addition property -/
mid_assoc (a c : M) : (a + z) + c = a + (z + c)
/-- associative property for right addition -/
right_assoc (a b : M) : (a + b) + z = a + (b + z)
/-- Conditions for an element to be multiplicatively central -/
@[to_additive]
structure IsMulCentral [Mul M] (z : M) : Prop where
/-- multiplication commutes -/
comm (a : M) : z * a = a * z
/-- associative property for left multiplication -/
left_assoc (b c : M) : z * (b * c) = (z * b) * c
/-- middle associative multiplication property -/
mid_assoc (a c : M) : (a * z) * c = a * (z * c)
/-- associative property for right multiplication -/
right_assoc (a b : M) : (a * b) * z = a * (b * z)
attribute [mk_iff] IsMulCentral IsAddCentral
attribute [to_additive existing] isMulCentral_iff
namespace IsMulCentral
variable {a b c : M} [Mul M]
-- cf. `Commute.left_comm`
@[to_additive]
protected theorem left_comm (h : IsMulCentral a) (b c) : a * (b * c) = b * (a * c) := by
simp only [h.comm, h.right_assoc]
-- cf. `Commute.right_comm`
@[to_additive]
protected theorem right_comm (h : IsMulCentral c) (a b) : a * b * c = a * c * b := by
simp only [h.right_assoc, h.mid_assoc, h.comm]
end IsMulCentral
namespace Set
section Mul
variable (M) [Mul M]
/-- The center of a magma. -/
@[to_additive addCenter " The center of an additive magma. "]
def center : Set M :=
{ z | IsMulCentral z }
#align set.center Set.center
#align set.add_center Set.addCenter
-- Porting note: The `to_additive` version used to be `mem_addCenter` without the iff
@[to_additive mem_addCenter_iff]
theorem mem_center_iff {z : M} : z ∈ center M ↔ IsMulCentral z :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_center_iff Set.mem_center_iff
#align set.mem_add_center Set.mem_addCenter_iff
variable {M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp) add_mem_addCenter]
theorem mul_mem_center [Mul M] {z₁ z₂ : M} (hz₁ : z₁ ∈ Set.center M) (hz₂ : z₂ ∈ Set.center M) :
z₁ * z₂ ∈ Set.center M where
comm a := calc
z₁ * z₂ * a = z₂ * z₁ * a := by rw [hz₁.comm]
_ = z₂ * (z₁ * a) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc z₂]
_ = (a * z₁) * z₂ := by rw [hz₁.comm, hz₂.comm]
_ = a * (z₁ * z₂) := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc a z₁]
left_assoc (b c : M) := calc
z₁ * z₂ * (b * c) = z₁ * (z₂ * (b * c)) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
_ = z₁ * ((z₂ * b) * c) := by rw [hz₂.left_assoc]
_ = (z₁ * (z₂ * b)) * c := by rw [hz₁.left_assoc]
_ = z₁ * z₂ * b * c := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
mid_assoc (a c : M) := calc
a * (z₁ * z₂) * c = ((a * z₁) * z₂) * c := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
_ = (a * z₁) * (z₂ * c) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
_ = a * (z₁ * (z₂ * c)) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
_ = a * (z₁ * z₂ * c) := by rw [hz₂.mid_assoc]
right_assoc (a b : M) := calc
a * b * (z₁ * z₂) = ((a * b) * z₁) * z₂ := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc]
_ = (a * (b * z₁)) * z₂ := by rw [hz₁.right_assoc]
_ = a * ((b * z₁) * z₂) := by rw [hz₂.right_assoc]
_ = a * (b * (z₁ * z₂)) := by rw [hz₁.mid_assoc]
#align set.mul_mem_center Set.mul_mem_center
#align set.add_mem_add_center Set.add_mem_addCenter
end Mul
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup M]
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Semigroup.mem_center_iff {z : M} :
z ∈ Set.center M ↔ ∀ g, g * z = z * g := ⟨fun a g ↦ by rw [IsMulCentral.comm a g],
fun h ↦ ⟨fun _ ↦ (Commute.eq (h _)).symm, fun _ _ ↦ (mul_assoc z _ _).symm,
fun _ _ ↦ mul_assoc _ z _, fun _ _ ↦ mul_assoc _ _ z⟩ ⟩
variable (M)
-- TODO Add `instance : Decidable (IsMulCentral a)` for `instance decidableMemCenter [Mul M]`
instance decidableMemCenter [∀ a : M, Decidable <| ∀ b : M, b * a = a * b] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ center M) := fun _ => decidable_of_iff' _ (Semigroup.mem_center_iff)
#align set.decidable_mem_center Set.decidableMemCenter
end Semigroup
section CommSemigroup
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) addCenter_eq_univ]
theorem center_eq_univ [CommSemigroup M] : center M = univ :=
(Subset.antisymm (subset_univ _)) fun _ _ => Semigroup.mem_center_iff.mpr (fun _ => mul_comm _ _)
#align set.center_eq_univ Set.center_eq_univ
#align set.add_center_eq_univ Set.addCenter_eq_univ
end CommSemigroup
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp) zero_mem_addCenter]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Center.lean | 157 | 161 | theorem one_mem_center [MulOneClass M] : (1 : M) ∈ Set.center M where
comm _ := by | rw [one_mul, mul_one]
left_assoc _ _ := by rw [one_mul, one_mul]
mid_assoc _ _ := by rw [mul_one, one_mul]
right_assoc _ _ := by rw [mul_one, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Probability.Process.HittingTime
import Mathlib.Probability.Martingale.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
#align_import probability.martingale.upcrossing from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c1d8ca2812b64f88992a5294ea3dba144755cd1"
/-!
# Doob's upcrossing estimate
Given a discrete real-valued submartingale $(f_n)_{n \in \mathbb{N}}$, denoting by $U_N(a, b)$ the
number of times $f_n$ crossed from below $a$ to above $b$ before time $N$, Doob's upcrossing
estimate (also known as Doob's inequality) states that
$$(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(f_N - a)^+].$$
Doob's upcrossing estimate is an important inequality and is central in proving the martingale
convergence theorems.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing above `b` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime a b f N n`: is the stopping time corresponding to `f`
crossing below `a` the `n`-th time before time `N` (if this does not occur then the value is
taken to be `N`).
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat a b f N`: is the predictable process which is 1 if `n` is
between a consecutive pair of lower and upper crossings and is 0 otherwise. Intuitively
one might think of the `upcrossingStrat` as the strategy of buying 1 share whenever the process
crosses below `a` for the first time after selling and selling 1 share whenever the process
crosses above `b` for the first time after buying.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore a b f N`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to
above `b` before time `N`.
* `MeasureTheory.upcrossings a b f`: is the number of times `f` crosses from below `a` to above
`b`. This takes value in `ℝ≥0∞` and so is allowed to be `∞`.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime`: `upperCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime`: `lowerCrossingTime` is a
stopping time whenever the process it is associated to is adapted.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_integral_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral_pos_part`: Doob's
upcrossing estimate.
* `MeasureTheory.Submartingale.mul_lintegral_upcrossings_le_lintegral_pos_part`: the inequality
obtained by taking the supremum on both sides of Doob's upcrossing estimate.
### References
We mostly follow the proof from [Kallenberg, *Foundations of modern probability*][kallenberg2021]
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {Ω ι : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace Ω} {μ : Measure Ω}
/-!
## Proof outline
In this section, we will denote by $U_N(a, b)$ the number of upcrossings of $(f_n)$ from below $a$
to above $b$ before time $N$.
To define $U_N(a, b)$, we will construct two stopping times corresponding to when $(f_n)$ crosses
below $a$ and above $b$. Namely, we define
$$
\sigma_n := \inf \{n \ge \tau_n \mid f_n \le a\} \wedge N;
$$
$$
\tau_{n + 1} := \inf \{n \ge \sigma_n \mid f_n \ge b\} \wedge N.
$$
These are `lowerCrossingTime` and `upperCrossingTime` in our formalization which are defined
using `MeasureTheory.hitting` allowing us to specify a starting and ending time.
Then, we may simply define $U_N(a, b) := \sup \{n \mid \tau_n < N\}$.
Fixing $a < b \in \mathbb{R}$, we will first prove the theorem in the special case that
$0 \le f_0$ and $a \le f_N$. In particular, we will show
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N].
$$
This is `MeasureTheory.integral_mul_upcrossingsBefore_le_integral` in our formalization.
To prove this, we use the fact that given a non-negative, bounded, predictable process $(C_n)$
(i.e. $(C_{n + 1})$ is adapted), $(C \bullet f)_n := \sum_{k \le n} C_{k + 1}(f_{k + 1} - f_k)$ is
a submartingale if $(f_n)$ is.
Define $C_n := \sum_{k \le n} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)$. It is easy to see that
$(1 - C_n)$ is non-negative, bounded and predictable, and hence, given a submartingale $(f_n)$,
$(1 - C) \bullet f$ is also a submartingale. Thus, by the submartingale property,
$0 \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_0] \le \mathbb{E}[((1 - C) \bullet f)_N]$ implying
$$
\mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N] \le \mathbb{E}[(1 \bullet f)_N] = \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0].
$$
Furthermore,
\begin{align}
(C \bullet f)_N & =
\sum_{n \le N} \sum_{k \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} \sum_{n \le N} \mathbf{1}_{[\sigma_k, \tau_{k + 1})}(n)(f_{n + 1} - f_n)\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\sigma_k + 1} - f_{\sigma_k} + f_{\sigma_k + 2} - f_{\sigma_k + 1}
+ \cdots + f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\tau_{k + 1} - 1})\\
& = \sum_{k \le N} (f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k})
\ge \sum_{k < U_N(a, b)} (b - a) = (b - a) U_N(a, b)
\end{align}
where the inequality follows since for all $k < U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} - f_{\sigma_k} \ge b - a$ while for all $k > U_N(a, b)$,
$f_{\tau_{k + 1}} = f_{\sigma_k} = f_N$ and
$f_{\tau_{U_N(a, b) + 1}} - f_{\sigma_{U_N(a, b)}} = f_N - a \ge 0$. Hence, we have
$$
(b - a) \mathbb{E}[U_N(a, b)] \le \mathbb{E}[(C \bullet f)_N]
\le \mathbb{E}[f_N] - \mathbb{E}[f_0] \le \mathbb{E}[f_N],
$$
as required.
To obtain the general case, we simply apply the above to $((f_n - a)^+)_n$.
-/
/-- `lowerCrossingTimeAux a f c N` is the first time `f` reached below `a` after time `c` before
time `N`. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTimeAux [Preorder ι] [InfSet ι] (a : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ) (c N : ι) :
Ω → ι :=
hitting f (Set.Iic a) c N
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_aux MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTimeAux
/-- `upperCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
above `b` after `f` reached below `a` for the `n - 1`-th time. -/
noncomputable def upperCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) : ℕ → Ω → ι
| 0 => ⊥
| n + 1 => fun ω =>
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime
/-- `lowerCrossingTime a b f N n` is the first time before time `N`, `f` reaches
below `a` after `f` reached above `b` for the `n`-th time. -/
noncomputable def lowerCrossingTime [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (n : ℕ) : Ω → ι := fun ω => hitting f (Set.Iic a) (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime
section
variable [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero : upperCrossingTime a b f N 0 = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_zero
@[simp]
theorem lowerCrossingTime_zero : lowerCrossingTime a b f N 0 = hitting f (Set.Iic a) ⊥ N :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_zero MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_zero
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTimeAux a f (upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω) N ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_succ MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_succ
theorem upperCrossingTime_succ_eq (ω : Ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω =
hitting f (Set.Ici b) (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) N ω := by
simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ]
rfl
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_succ_eq MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_succ_eq
end
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot ι]
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ} {N : ι} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem upperCrossingTime_le : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
cases n
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_zero, Pi.bot_apply, bot_le, Nat.zero_eq]
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ, hitting_le]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_le MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_le
@[simp]
theorem upperCrossingTime_zero' : upperCrossingTime a b f ⊥ n ω = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 upperCrossingTime_le
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_zero' MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_zero'
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ N := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_le ω]
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_le MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_le
theorem upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, le_hitting upperCrossingTime_le ω]
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_le_lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
theorem lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ]
exact le_hitting lowerCrossingTime_le ω
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_le_upper_crossing_time_succ MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
theorem lowerCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_mono MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_mono
theorem upperCrossingTime_mono (hnm : n ≤ m) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω := by
suffices Monotone fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω by exact this hnm
exact monotone_nat_of_le_succ fun n =>
le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_mono MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_mono
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
variable {a b : ℝ} {f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ} {N : ℕ} {n m : ℕ} {ω : Ω}
theorem stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω ≠ N) :
stoppedValue f (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) ω ≤ a := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 lowerCrossingTime_le⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.stopped_value_lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime
theorem stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
b ≤ stoppedValue f (upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1)) ω := by
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := (hitting_le_iff_of_lt _ (lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le h)).1 le_rfl
exact stoppedValue_hitting_mem ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, le_trans hj₁.2 (hitting_le _)⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.stopped_value_upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_lowerCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < lowerCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans ?_ (stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime hn)
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_lt_lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_lt_lowerCrossingTime
theorem lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime (hab : a < b)
(hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ fun h =>
not_le.2 hab <| le_trans (stoppedValue_upperCrossingTime hn) ?_
simp only [stoppedValue]
rw [← h]
exact stoppedValue_lowerCrossingTime (h.symm ▸ hn)
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_lt_upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_succ (hab : a < b) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ≠ N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_lt_upperCrossingTime hab hn)
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_lt_succ MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_lt_succ
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (lowerCrossingTime_mono hnm))
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_stabilize MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_stabilize
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (le_trans (le_of_eq hn.symm) (upperCrossingTime_mono hnm))
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_stabilize MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_stabilize
theorem lowerCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
lowerCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm lowerCrossingTime_le hn)
#align measure_theory.lower_crossing_time_stabilize' MeasureTheory.lowerCrossingTime_stabilize'
theorem upperCrossingTime_stabilize' (hnm : n ≤ m) (hn : N ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N m ω = N :=
upperCrossingTime_stabilize hnm (le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le hn)
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_stabilize' MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_stabilize'
-- `upperCrossingTime_bound_eq` provides an explicit bound
theorem exists_upperCrossingTime_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
∃ n, upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
by_contra h; push_neg at h
have : StrictMono fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω :=
strictMono_nat_of_lt_succ fun n => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab (h _)
obtain ⟨_, ⟨k, rfl⟩, hk⟩ :
∃ (m : _) (_ : m ∈ Set.range fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω), N < m :=
⟨upperCrossingTime a b f N (N + 1) ω, ⟨N + 1, rfl⟩,
lt_of_lt_of_le N.lt_succ_self (StrictMono.id_le this (N + 1))⟩
exact not_le.2 hk upperCrossingTime_le
#align measure_theory.exists_upper_crossing_time_eq MeasureTheory.exists_upperCrossingTime_eq
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove (hab : a < b) :
BddAbove {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N} := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab
refine ⟨k, fun n (hn : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) => ?_⟩
by_contra hn'
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_stabilize (not_le.1 hn').le hk)
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_lt_bdd_above MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty (hN : 0 < N) :
{n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}.Nonempty :=
⟨0, hN⟩
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_lt_nonempty MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty
theorem upperCrossingTime_bound_eq (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N : ℕ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N N ω = N := by
by_cases hN' : N < Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)
· refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le ?_
have hmono : StrictMonoOn (fun n => upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω)
(Set.Iic (Nat.find (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab)).pred) := by
refine strictMonoOn_Iic_of_lt_succ fun m hm => upperCrossingTime_lt_succ hab ?_
rw [Nat.lt_pred_iff] at hm
convert Nat.find_min _ hm
convert StrictMonoOn.Iic_id_le hmono N (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt hN')
· rw [not_lt] at hN'
exact upperCrossingTime_stabilize hN' (Nat.find_spec (exists_upperCrossingTime_eq f N ω hab))
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_bound_eq MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_bound_eq
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le (hab : a < b) (hn : N ≤ n) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N :=
le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le
(le_trans (upperCrossingTime_bound_eq f N ω hab).symm.le (upperCrossingTime_mono hn))
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_eq_of_bound_le MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le
variable {ℱ : Filtration ℕ m0}
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_crossing (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) ∧
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) := by
induction' n with k ih
· refine ⟨isStoppingTime_const _ 0, ?_⟩
simp [hitting_isStoppingTime hf measurableSet_Iic]
· obtain ⟨_, ih₂⟩ := ih
have : IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1)) := by
intro n
simp_rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime ih₂ (fun _ => lowerCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Ici hf _
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
intro n
exact isStoppingTime_hitting_isStoppingTime this (fun _ => upperCrossingTime_le)
measurableSet_Iic hf _
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_crossing MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_crossing
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (upperCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.1
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_upper_crossing_time MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime
theorem Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
IsStoppingTime ℱ (lowerCrossingTime a b f N n) :=
hf.isStoppingTime_crossing.2
#align measure_theory.adapted.is_stopping_time_lower_crossing_time MeasureTheory.Adapted.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime
/-- `upcrossingStrat a b f N n` is 1 if `n` is between a consecutive pair of lower and upper
crossings and is 0 otherwise. `upcrossingStrat` is shifted by one index so that it is adapted
rather than predictable. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingStrat (a b : ℝ) (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (N n : ℕ) (ω : Ω) : ℝ :=
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N,
(Set.Ico (lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω) (upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω)).indicator 1 n
#align measure_theory.upcrossing_strat MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat
theorem upcrossingStrat_nonneg : 0 ≤ upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω :=
Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => Set.indicator_nonneg (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
#align measure_theory.upcrossing_strat_nonneg MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat_nonneg
theorem upcrossingStrat_le_one : upcrossingStrat a b f N n ω ≤ 1 := by
rw [upcrossingStrat, ← Finset.indicator_biUnion_apply]
· exact Set.indicator_le_self' (fun _ _ => zero_le_one) _
intro i _ j _ hij
simp only [Set.Ico_disjoint_Ico]
obtain hij' | hij' := lt_or_gt_of_ne hij
· rw [min_eq_left (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_right (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
· rw [gt_iff_lt] at hij'
rw [min_eq_right (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_succ hij'.le) :
upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω ≤ upperCrossingTime a b f N _ ω),
max_eq_left (lowerCrossingTime_mono hij'.le :
lowerCrossingTime a b f N _ _ ≤ lowerCrossingTime _ _ _ _ _ _)]
refine le_trans upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime
(lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hij'))
#align measure_theory.upcrossing_strat_le_one MeasureTheory.upcrossingStrat_le_one
theorem Adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (hf : Adapted ℱ f) :
Adapted ℱ (upcrossingStrat a b f N) := by
intro n
change StronglyMeasurable[ℱ n] fun ω =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range N, ({n | lowerCrossingTime a b f N k ω ≤ n} ∩
{n | n < upperCrossingTime a b f N (k + 1) ω}).indicator 1 n
refine Finset.stronglyMeasurable_sum _ fun i _ =>
stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator ((hf.isStoppingTime_lowerCrossingTime n).inter ?_)
simp_rw [← not_le]
exact (hf.isStoppingTime_upperCrossingTime n).compl
#align measure_theory.adapted.upcrossing_strat_adapted MeasureTheory.Adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted
theorem Submartingale.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ :=
hf.sum_mul_sub hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted (fun _ _ => upcrossingStrat_le_one) fun _ _ =>
upcrossingStrat_nonneg
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sum_upcrossing_strat_mul MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul
theorem Submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ)
(a b : ℝ) (N : ℕ) : Submartingale (fun n : ℕ =>
∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)) ℱ μ := by
refine hf.sum_mul_sub (fun n => (adapted_const ℱ 1 n).sub (hf.adapted.upcrossingStrat_adapted n))
(?_ : ∀ n ω, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N n) ω ≤ 1) ?_
· exact fun n ω => sub_le_self _ upcrossingStrat_nonneg
· intro n ω
simp [upcrossingStrat_le_one]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossing_strat_mul MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul
theorem Submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hf : Submartingale f ℱ μ) :
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] ≤ μ[f n] - μ[f 0] := by
have h₁ : (0 : ℝ) ≤
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
have := (hf.sum_sub_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).setIntegral_le (zero_le n) MeasurableSet.univ
rw [integral_univ, integral_univ] at this
refine le_trans ?_ this
simp only [Finset.range_zero, Finset.sum_empty, integral_zero', le_refl]
have h₂ : μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (1 - upcrossingStrat a b f N k) * (f (k + 1) - f k)] =
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (f (k + 1) - f k)] -
μ[∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, upcrossingStrat a b f N k * (f (k + 1) - f k)] := by
simp only [sub_mul, one_mul, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_apply,
Pi.mul_apply]
refine integral_sub (Integrable.sub (integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)
(integrable_finset_sum _ fun i _ => hf.integrable _)) ?_
convert (hf.sum_upcrossingStrat_mul a b N).integrable n using 1
ext; simp
rw [h₂, sub_nonneg] at h₁
refine le_trans h₁ ?_
simp_rw [Finset.sum_range_sub, integral_sub' (hf.integrable _) (hf.integrable _), le_refl]
#align measure_theory.submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossing_strat_le MeasureTheory.Submartingale.sum_mul_upcrossingStrat_le
/-- The number of upcrossings (strictly) before time `N`. -/
noncomputable def upcrossingsBefore [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] (a b : ℝ) (f : ι → Ω → ℝ)
(N : ι) (ω : Ω) : ℕ :=
sSup {n | upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N}
#align measure_theory.upcrossings_before MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_bot [Preorder ι] [OrderBot ι] [InfSet ι] {a b : ℝ} {f : ι → Ω → ℝ}
{ω : Ω} : upcrossingsBefore a b f ⊥ ω = ⊥ := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
#align measure_theory.upcrossings_before_bot MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore_bot
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 ω = 0 := by simp [upcrossingsBefore]
#align measure_theory.upcrossings_before_zero MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore_zero
@[simp]
theorem upcrossingsBefore_zero' : upcrossingsBefore a b f 0 = 0 := by
ext ω; exact upcrossingsBefore_zero
#align measure_theory.upcrossings_before_zero' MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore_zero'
theorem upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore (hN : 0 < N) (hab : a < b)
(hn : n ≤ upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
haveI : upperCrossingTime a b f N (upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω) ω < N :=
(upperCrossingTime_lt_nonempty hN).csSup_mem
((OrderBot.bddBelow _).finite_of_bddAbove (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab))
lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono hn) this
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_lt_of_le_upcrossings_before MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_lt_of_le_upcrossingsBefore
theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt (hab : a < b)
(hn : upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω < n) : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω = N := by
refine le_antisymm upperCrossingTime_le (not_lt.1 ?_)
convert not_mem_of_csSup_lt hn (upperCrossingTime_lt_bddAbove hab)
#align measure_theory.upper_crossing_time_eq_of_upcrossings_before_lt MeasureTheory.upperCrossingTime_eq_of_upcrossingsBefore_lt
theorem upcrossingsBefore_le (f : ℕ → Ω → ℝ) (ω : Ω) (hab : a < b) :
upcrossingsBefore a b f N ω ≤ N := by
by_cases hN : N = 0
· subst hN
rw [upcrossingsBefore_zero]
· refine csSup_le ⟨0, zero_lt_iff.2 hN⟩ fun n (hn : _ < N) => ?_
by_contra hnN
exact hn.ne (upperCrossingTime_eq_of_bound_le hab (not_le.1 hnN).le)
#align measure_theory.upcrossings_before_le MeasureTheory.upcrossingsBefore_le
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have h' : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N :=
lt_of_le_of_lt upperCrossingTime_le_lowerCrossingTime h
induction' n with k ih
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, upperCrossingTime_zero, bot_eq_zero', eq_self_iff_true,
lowerCrossingTime_zero, true_and_iff, eq_comm]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
· specialize ih (lt_of_le_of_lt (lowerCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h)
(lt_of_le_of_lt (upperCrossingTime_mono (Nat.le_succ _)) h')
have : upperCrossingTime a b f M k.succ ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N k.succ ω := by
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h'
· simp only [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq]
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h'
rw [eq_comm, ih.2]
exact hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
simp only [lowerCrossingTime, eq_comm, this, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [lowerCrossingTime, hitting_lt_iff _ le_rfl] at h
obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
#align measure_theory.crossing_eq_crossing_of_lower_crossing_time_lt MeasureTheory.crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt
theorem crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M (n + 1) ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N (n + 1) ω ∧
lowerCrossingTime a b f M n ω = lowerCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by
have := (crossing_eq_crossing_of_lowerCrossingTime_lt hNM
(lt_of_le_of_lt lowerCrossingTime_le_upperCrossingTime_succ h)).2
refine ⟨?_, this⟩
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, eq_comm, this]
refine hitting_eq_hitting_of_exists hNM ?_
rw [upperCrossingTime_succ_eq, hitting_lt_iff] at h
· obtain ⟨j, hj₁, hj₂⟩ := h
exact ⟨j, ⟨hj₁.1, hj₁.2.le⟩, hj₂⟩
· exact le_rfl
#align measure_theory.crossing_eq_crossing_of_upper_crossing_time_lt MeasureTheory.crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt
| Mathlib/Probability/Martingale/Upcrossing.lean | 537 | 542 | theorem upperCrossingTime_eq_upperCrossingTime_of_lt {M : ℕ} (hNM : N ≤ M)
(h : upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω < N) :
upperCrossingTime a b f M n ω = upperCrossingTime a b f N n ω := by |
cases n
· simp
· exact (crossing_eq_crossing_of_upperCrossingTime_lt hNM h).1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
#align_import data.num.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
/-
Porting note:
`bit0` and `bit1` are deprecated because it is mainly used to represent number literal in Lean3 but
not in Lean4 anymore. However, this file uses them for encoding numbers so this linter is
unnecessary.
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false
-- Porting note: Required for the notation `-[n+1]`.
open Int Function
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one PosNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one' PosNum.cast_one'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit0 PosNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit1 PosNum.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => (Nat.cast_bit0 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit0 p.cast_to_nat
| bit1 p => (Nat.cast_bit1 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit1 p.cast_to_nat
#align pos_num.cast_to_nat PosNum.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align pos_num.to_nat_to_int PosNum.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_to_int PosNum.cast_to_int
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit0 (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.succ_to_nat PosNum.succ_to_nat
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_add PosNum.one_add
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.add_one PosNum.add_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.add_to_nat PosNum.add_to_nat
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
#align pos_num.add_succ PosNum.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, _root_.bit0 n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (_root_.bit0 p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
#align pos_num.bit0_of_bit0 PosNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : _root_.bit1 n = bit1 n :=
show _root_.bit0 n + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
#align pos_num.bit1_of_bit1 PosNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
#align pos_num.mul_to_nat PosNum.mul_to_nat
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
#align pos_num.to_nat_pos PosNum.to_nat_pos
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat_lemma PosNum.cmp_to_nat_lemma
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> cases' n with n n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.cmp_swap PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat PosNum.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align pos_num.lt_to_nat PosNum.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align pos_num.le_to_nat PosNum.le_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_zero Num.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zero_add Num.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align num.add_one Num.add_one
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos p, pos q => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
#align num.add_succ Num.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
#align num.bit0_of_bit0 Num.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
#align num.bit1_of_bit1 Num.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
#align num.of_nat'_zero Num.ofNat'_zero
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq rfl _ _
#align num.of_nat'_bit Num.ofNat'_bit
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
#align num.of_nat'_one Num.ofNat'_one
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.bit1_succ Num.bit1_succ
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond, _root_.bit1]
-- Porting note: `cc` was not ported yet so `exact Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1` is used.
· erw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by
simpa [Nat.bit, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1,
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
#align num.of_nat'_succ Num.ofNat'_succ
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
#align num.add_of_nat' Num.add_ofNat'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero Num.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero' Num.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_one Num.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align num.cast_pos Num.cast_pos
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
#align num.succ'_to_nat Num.succ'_to_nat
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
#align num.succ_to_nat Num.succ_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
#align num.cast_to_nat Num.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
#align num.add_to_nat Num.add_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
#align num.mul_to_nat Num.mul_to_nat
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos b => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
#align num.cmp_to_nat Num.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align num.lt_to_nat Num.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align num.le_to_nat Num.le_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit false, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
| bit1 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
#align pos_num.of_to_nat' PosNum.of_to_nat'
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat' Num.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) := LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
#align num.to_nat_inj Num.to_nat_inj
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
#align num.add_monoid Num.addMonoid
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
#align num.add_monoid_with_one Num.addMonoidWithOne
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
#align num.comm_semiring Num.commSemiring
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Num where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
#align num.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid
instance linearOrderedSemiring : LinearOrderedSemiring Num :=
{ Num.commSemiring,
Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid with
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
decidableLT := Num.decidableLT
decidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
decidableEq := instDecidableEqNum
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
#align num.linear_ordered_semiring Num.linearOrderedSemiring
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
#align num.add_of_nat Num.add_of_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align num.to_nat_to_int Num.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_to_int Num.cast_to_int
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
#align num.to_of_nat Num.to_of_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
#align num.of_nat_cast Num.of_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias of_nat_cast := of_natCast
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.of_nat_inj Num.of_nat_inj
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat Num.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
#align num.dvd_to_nat Num.dvd_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
#align pos_num.of_to_nat PosNum.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
#align pos_num.to_nat_inj PosNum.to_nat_inj
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (_root_.bit0 n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 n => rfl
#align pos_num.pred'_to_nat PosNum.pred'_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
#align pos_num.pred'_succ' PosNum.pred'_succ'
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
#align pos_num.succ'_pred' PosNum.succ'_pred'
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
#align pos_num.has_dvd PosNum.dvd
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
#align pos_num.dvd_to_nat PosNum.dvd_to_nat
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, Nat.size_bit0 <| ne_of_gt <| to_nat_pos n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, Nat.size_bit1]
#align pos_num.size_to_nat PosNum.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
#align pos_num.size_eq_nat_size PosNum.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align pos_num.nat_size_to_nat PosNum.natSize_to_nat
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
#align pos_num.nat_size_pos PosNum.natSize_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.add_comm_semigroup PosNum.addCommSemigroup
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.comm_monoid PosNum.commMonoid
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
#align pos_num.distrib PosNum.distrib
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
decidableLT := by infer_instance
decidableLE := by infer_instance
decidableEq := by infer_instance
#align pos_num.linear_order PosNum.linearOrder
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
#align pos_num.cast_to_num PosNum.cast_to_num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> rfl
#align pos_num.bit_to_nat PosNum.bit_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_add PosNum.cast_add
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align pos_num.cast_succ PosNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align pos_num.cast_inj PosNum.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : (1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
#align pos_num.one_le_cast PosNum.one_le_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
#align pos_num.cast_pos PosNum.cast_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_mul PosNum.cast_mul
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align pos_num.cmp_eq PosNum.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_lt PosNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align pos_num.cast_le PosNum.cast_le
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.bit_to_nat Num.bit_to_nat
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_succ' Num.cast_succ'
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
#align num.cast_succ Num.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_add Num.cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, _root_.bit0, cast_add]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit0 Num.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) := by
rw [← bit1_of_bit1, _root_.bit1, bit0_of_bit0, cast_add, cast_bit0]; rfl
#align num.cast_bit1 Num.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : α) = m * n
| 0, 0 => (zero_mul _).symm
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => (mul_zero _).symm
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.cast_mul _ _
#align num.cast_mul Num.cast_mul
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 0 => Nat.size_zero.symm
| pos p => p.size_to_nat
#align num.size_to_nat Num.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => p.size_eq_natSize
#align num.size_eq_nat_size Num.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align num.nat_size_to_nat Num.natSize_to_nat
@[simp 999]
theorem ofNat'_eq : ∀ n, Num.ofNat' n = n :=
Nat.binaryRec (by simp) fun b n IH => by
rw [ofNat'] at IH ⊢
rw [Nat.binaryRec_eq, IH]
-- Porting note: `Nat.cast_bit0` & `Nat.cast_bit1` are not `simp` theorems anymore.
· cases b <;> simp [Nat.bit, bit0_of_bit0, bit1_of_bit1, Nat.cast_bit0, Nat.cast_bit1]
· rfl
#align num.of_nat'_eq Num.ofNat'_eq
theorem zneg_toZNum (n : Num) : -n.toZNum = n.toZNumNeg := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum Num.zneg_toZNum
theorem zneg_toZNumNeg (n : Num) : -n.toZNumNeg = n.toZNum := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zneg_to_znum_neg Num.zneg_toZNumNeg
theorem toZNum_inj {m n : Num} : m.toZNum = n.toZNum ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => by cases m <;> cases n <;> cases h <;> rfl, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.to_znum_inj Num.toZNum_inj
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNum [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNum : α) = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum Num.cast_toZNum
@[simp]
theorem cast_toZNumNeg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n : Num, (n.toZNumNeg : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align num.cast_to_znum_neg Num.cast_toZNumNeg
@[simp]
theorem add_toZNum (m n : Num) : Num.toZNum (m + n) = m.toZNum + n.toZNum := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_to_znum Num.add_toZNum
end Num
namespace PosNum
open Num
theorem pred_to_nat {n : PosNum} (h : 1 < n) : (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n := by
unfold pred
cases e : pred' n
· have : (1 : ℕ) ≤ Nat.pred n := Nat.pred_le_pred ((@cast_lt ℕ _ _ _).2 h)
rw [← pred'_to_nat, e] at this
exact absurd this (by decide)
· rw [← pred'_to_nat, e]
rfl
#align pos_num.pred_to_nat PosNum.pred_to_nat
theorem sub'_one (a : PosNum) : sub' a 1 = (pred' a).toZNum := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.sub'_one PosNum.sub'_one
theorem one_sub' (a : PosNum) : sub' 1 a = (pred' a).toZNumNeg := by cases a <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_sub' PosNum.one_sub'
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align pos_num.lt_iff_cmp PosNum.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align pos_num.le_iff_cmp PosNum.le_iff_cmp
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem pred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (pred n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by rw [pred, PosNum.pred'_to_nat]; rfl
#align num.pred_to_nat Num.pred_to_nat
theorem ppred_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, (↑) <$> ppred n = Nat.ppred n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by
rw [ppred, Option.map_some, Nat.ppred_eq_some.2]
rw [PosNum.pred'_to_nat, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (PosNum.to_nat_pos _)]
rfl
#align num.ppred_to_nat Num.ppred_to_nat
theorem cmp_swap (m n) : (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
cases m <;> cases n <;> try { rfl }; apply PosNum.cmp_swap
#align num.cmp_swap Num.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this; exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align num.cmp_eq Num.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align num.cast_lt Num.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align num.cast_le Num.cast_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : Num} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align num.cast_inj Num.cast_inj
theorem lt_iff_cmp {m n} : m < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt :=
Iff.rfl
#align num.lt_iff_cmp Num.lt_iff_cmp
theorem le_iff_cmp {m n} : m ≤ n ↔ cmp m n ≠ Ordering.gt :=
not_congr <| lt_iff_cmp.trans <| by rw [← cmp_swap]; cases cmp m n <;> decide
#align num.le_iff_cmp Num.le_iff_cmp
theorem castNum_eq_bitwise {f : Num → Num → Num} {g : Bool → Bool → Bool}
(p : PosNum → PosNum → Num)
(gff : g false false = false) (f00 : f 0 0 = 0)
(f0n : ∀ n, f 0 (pos n) = cond (g false true) (pos n) 0)
(fn0 : ∀ n, f (pos n) 0 = cond (g true false) (pos n) 0)
(fnn : ∀ m n, f (pos m) (pos n) = p m n) (p11 : p 1 1 = cond (g true true) 1 0)
(p1b : ∀ b n, p 1 (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g true b) (cond (g false true) (pos n) 0))
(pb1 : ∀ a m, p (PosNum.bit a m) 1 = bit (g a true) (cond (g true false) (pos m) 0))
(pbb : ∀ a b m n, p (PosNum.bit a m) (PosNum.bit b n) = bit (g a b) (p m n)) :
∀ m n : Num, (f m n : ℕ) = Nat.bitwise g m n := by
intros m n
cases' m with m <;> cases' n with n <;>
try simp only [show zero = 0 from rfl, show ((0 : Num) : ℕ) = 0 from rfl]
· rw [f00, Nat.bitwise_zero]; rfl
· rw [f0n, Nat.bitwise_zero_left]
cases g false true <;> rfl
· rw [fn0, Nat.bitwise_zero_right]
cases g true false <;> rfl
· rw [fnn]
have : ∀ (b) (n : PosNum), (cond b (↑n) 0 : ℕ) = ↑(cond b (pos n) 0 : Num) := by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl
induction' m with m IH m IH generalizing n <;> cases' n with n n
any_goals simp only [show one = 1 from rfl, show pos 1 = 1 from rfl,
show PosNum.bit0 = PosNum.bit false from rfl, show PosNum.bit1 = PosNum.bit true from rfl,
show ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = Nat.bit true 0 from rfl]
all_goals
repeat
rw [show ∀ b n, (pos (PosNum.bit b n) : ℕ) = Nat.bit b ↑n by
intros b _; cases b <;> rfl]
rw [Nat.bitwise_bit gff]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero, p11]; cases g true true <;> rfl
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_left, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, p1b]
any_goals rw [Nat.bitwise_zero_right, ← Bool.cond_eq_ite, this, ← bit_to_nat, pb1]
all_goals
rw [← show ∀ n : PosNum, ↑(p m n) = Nat.bitwise g ↑m ↑n from IH]
rw [← bit_to_nat, pbb]
#align num.bitwise_to_nat Num.castNum_eq_bitwise
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_or : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ||| n) = (↑m ||| ↑n : ℕ) := by
-- Porting note: A name of an implicit local hypothesis is not available so
-- `cases_type*` is used.
apply castNum_eq_bitwise fun x y => pos (PosNum.lor x y) <;>
intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lor_to_nat Num.castNum_or
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_and : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m &&& n) = (↑m &&& ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.land <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.land_to_nat Num.castNum_and
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_ldiff : ∀ m n : Num, (ldiff m n : ℕ) = Nat.ldiff m n := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.ldiff <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.ldiff_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_xor : ∀ m n : Num, ↑(m ^^^ n) = (↑m ^^^ ↑n : ℕ) := by
apply castNum_eq_bitwise PosNum.lxor <;> intros <;> (try cases_type* Bool) <;> rfl
#align num.lxor_to_nat Num.castNum_ldiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftLeft (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m <<< n) = (m : ℕ) <<< (n : ℕ) := by
cases m <;> dsimp only [← shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftLeft
simp only [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH
· rfl
simp [PosNum.shiftl_succ_eq_bit0_shiftl, Nat.shiftLeft_succ, IH,
Nat.bit0_val, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm,
-shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, -PosNum.shiftl_eq_shiftLeft, shiftl]
#align num.shiftl_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftLeft
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem castNum_shiftRight (m : Num) (n : Nat) : ↑(m >>> n) = (m : ℕ) >>> (n : ℕ) := by
cases' m with m <;> dsimp only [← shiftr_eq_shiftRight, shiftr];
· symm
apply Nat.zero_shiftRight
induction' n with n IH generalizing m
· cases m <;> rfl
cases' m with m m <;> dsimp only [PosNum.shiftr, ← PosNum.shiftr_eq_shiftRight]
· rw [Nat.shiftRight_eq_div_pow]
symm
apply Nat.div_eq_of_lt
simp
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit1 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
· trans
· apply IH
change Nat.shiftRight m n = Nat.shiftRight (_root_.bit0 m) (n + 1)
rw [add_comm n 1, @Nat.shiftRight_eq _ (1 + n), Nat.shiftRight_add]
apply congr_arg fun x => Nat.shiftRight x n
simp [Nat.shiftRight_succ, Nat.shiftRight_zero, ← Nat.div2_val]
#align num.shiftr_to_nat Num.castNum_shiftRight
@[simp]
theorem castNum_testBit (m n) : testBit m n = Nat.testBit m n := by
-- Porting note: `unfold` → `dsimp only`
cases m with dsimp only [testBit]
| zero =>
rw [show (Num.zero : Nat) = 0 from rfl, Nat.zero_testBit]
| pos m =>
rw [cast_pos]
induction' n with n IH generalizing m <;> cases' m with m m
<;> dsimp only [PosNum.testBit, Nat.zero_eq]
· rfl
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_zero]
· simp
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit1, ← Nat.bit_true, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
· rw [PosNum.cast_bit0, ← Nat.bit_false, Nat.testBit_bit_succ, IH]
#align num.test_bit_to_nat Num.castNum_testBit
end Num
namespace ZNum
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((0 : ZNum) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero ZNum.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : (ZNum.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_zero' ZNum.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] : ((1 : ZNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_one ZNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_pos ZNum.cast_pos
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] [Neg α] (n : PosNum) : (neg n : α) = -n :=
rfl
#align znum.cast_neg ZNum.cast_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zneg [AddGroup α] [One α] : ∀ n, ((-n : ZNum) : α) = -n
| 0 => neg_zero.symm
| pos _p => rfl
| neg _p => (neg_neg _).symm
#align znum.cast_zneg ZNum.cast_zneg
theorem neg_zero : (-0 : ZNum) = 0 :=
rfl
#align znum.neg_zero ZNum.neg_zero
theorem zneg_pos (n : PosNum) : -pos n = neg n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_pos ZNum.zneg_pos
theorem zneg_neg (n : PosNum) : -neg n = pos n :=
rfl
#align znum.zneg_neg ZNum.zneg_neg
theorem zneg_zneg (n : ZNum) : - -n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_zneg ZNum.zneg_zneg
theorem zneg_bit1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bit1 = (-n).bitm1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bit1 ZNum.zneg_bit1
theorem zneg_bitm1 (n : ZNum) : -n.bitm1 = (-n).bit1 := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zneg_bitm1 ZNum.zneg_bitm1
theorem zneg_succ (n : ZNum) : -n.succ = (-n).pred := by
cases n <;> try { rfl }; rw [succ, Num.zneg_toZNumNeg]; rfl
#align znum.zneg_succ ZNum.zneg_succ
theorem zneg_pred (n : ZNum) : -n.pred = (-n).succ := by
rw [← zneg_zneg (succ (-n)), zneg_succ, zneg_zneg]
#align znum.zneg_pred ZNum.zneg_pred
@[simp]
theorem abs_to_nat : ∀ n, (abs n : ℕ) = Int.natAbs n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg Int.natAbs p.to_nat_to_int
| neg p => show Int.natAbs ((p : ℕ) : ℤ) = Int.natAbs (-p) by rw [p.to_nat_to_int, Int.natAbs_neg]
#align znum.abs_to_nat ZNum.abs_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem abs_toZNum : ∀ n : Num, abs n.toZNum = n
| 0 => rfl
| Num.pos _p => rfl
#align znum.abs_to_znum ZNum.abs_toZNum
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, ((n : ℤ) : α) = n
| 0 => by rw [cast_zero, cast_zero, Int.cast_zero]
| pos p => by rw [cast_pos, cast_pos, PosNum.cast_to_int]
| neg p => by rw [cast_neg, cast_neg, Int.cast_neg, PosNum.cast_to_int]
#align znum.cast_to_int ZNum.cast_to_int
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit0_of_bit0
| neg a => congr_arg neg a.bit0_of_bit0
#align znum.bit0_of_bit0 ZNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : ZNum, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos a => congr_arg pos a.bit1_of_bit1
| neg a => show PosNum.sub' 1 (_root_.bit0 a) = _ by rw [PosNum.one_sub', a.bit0_of_bit0]; rfl
#align znum.bit1_of_bit1 ZNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit0 : α) = bit0 (n : α)
| 0 => (add_zero _).symm
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit0, cast_neg, cast_neg, PosNum.cast_bit0, _root_.bit0, _root_.bit0, neg_add_rev]
#align znum.cast_bit0 ZNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ n : ZNum, (n.bit1 : α) = bit1 (n : α)
| 0 => by simp [ZNum.bit1, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
| pos p => by rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_pos, cast_pos]; rfl
| neg p => by
rw [ZNum.bit1, cast_neg, cast_neg]
cases' e : pred' p with a <;>
have ep : p = _ := (succ'_pred' p).symm.trans (congr_arg Num.succ' e)
· conv at ep => change p = 1
subst p
simp [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0]
-- Porting note: `rw [Num.succ']` yields a `match` pattern.
· dsimp only [Num.succ'] at ep
subst p
have : (↑(-↑a : ℤ) : α) = -1 + ↑(-↑a + 1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm (- ↑a : ℤ) 1]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using this
#align znum.cast_bit1 ZNum.cast_bit1
@[simp]
theorem cast_bitm1 [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : ZNum) : (n.bitm1 : α) = bit0 (n : α) - 1 := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← zneg_zneg n]
rw [← zneg_bit1, cast_zneg, cast_bit1]
have : ((-1 + n + n : ℤ) : α) = (n + n + -1 : ℤ) := by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
#align znum.cast_bitm1 ZNum.cast_bitm1
theorem add_zero (n : ZNum) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.add_zero ZNum.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : ZNum) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align znum.zero_add ZNum.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : ZNum, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.add_one
| neg p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align znum.add_one ZNum.add_one
end ZNum
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
theorem cast_to_znum : ∀ n : PosNum, (n : ZNum) = ZNum.pos n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => (ZNum.bit0_of_bit0 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
| bit1 p => (ZNum.bit1_of_bit1 p).trans <| congr_arg _ (cast_to_znum p)
#align pos_num.cast_to_znum PosNum.cast_to_znum
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 1,162 | 1,187 | theorem cast_sub' [AddGroupWithOne α] : ∀ m n : PosNum, (sub' m n : α) = m - n
| a, 1 => by
rw [sub'_one, Num.cast_toZNum, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, ← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| 1, b => by
rw [one_sub', Num.cast_toZNumNeg, ← neg_sub, neg_inj, ← Num.cast_to_nat, pred'_to_nat,
← Nat.sub_one]
simp [PosNum.cast_pos]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((a + -b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + a + (-b + -b) := by | simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bitm1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + -1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + -1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit1, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + (-b + 1)) : ℤ) : α) = (a + 1 + (-b + -b) : ℤ) := by
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
rw [sub', ZNum.cast_bit0, cast_sub' a b]
have : ((-b + (a + -b) : ℤ) : α) = a + (-b + -b) := by simp [add_left_comm]
simpa [_root_.bit1, _root_.bit0, sub_eq_add_neg] using this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.CompleteLinearOrder
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.SchroederBernstein
#align_import set_theory.cardinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3ff3f2d6a3118b8711063de7111a0d77a53219a8"
/-!
# Cardinal Numbers
We define cardinal numbers as a quotient of types under the equivalence relation of equinumerity.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal` is the type of cardinal numbers (in a given universe).
* `Cardinal.mk α` or `#α` is the cardinality of `α`. The notation `#` lives in the locale
`Cardinal`.
* Addition `c₁ + c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.add_def α β : #α + #β = #(α ⊕ β)`.
* Multiplication `c₁ * c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.mul_def : #α * #β = #(α × β)`.
* The order `c₁ ≤ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.le_def α β : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β)`.
* Exponentiation `c₁ ^ c₂` is defined by `Cardinal.power_def α β : #α ^ #β = #(β → α)`.
* `Cardinal.isLimit c` means that `c` is a (weak) limit cardinal: `c ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x < c, succ x < c`.
* `Cardinal.aleph0` or `ℵ₀` is the cardinality of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Cardinal.aleph0.{u} : Cardinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `Cardinal.sum` is the sum of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding sigma type.
* `Cardinal.prod` is the product of an indexed family of cardinals, i.e. the cardinality of the
corresponding pi type.
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## Main instances
* Cardinals form a `CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring` with the aforementioned sum and product.
* Cardinals form a `SuccOrder`. Use `Order.succ c` for the smallest cardinal greater than `c`.
* The less than relation on cardinals forms a well-order.
* Cardinals form a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot`. Bounded sets for cardinals in universe
`u` are precisely the sets indexed by some type in universe `u`, see
`Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small`. One can use `sSup` for the cardinal supremum, and `sInf` for the
minimum of a set of cardinals.
## Main Statements
* Cantor's theorem: `Cardinal.cantor c : c < 2 ^ c`.
* König's theorem: `Cardinal.sum_lt_prod`
## Implementation notes
* There is a type of cardinal numbers in every universe level:
`Cardinal.{u} : Type (u + 1)` is the quotient of types in `Type u`.
The operation `Cardinal.lift` lifts cardinal numbers to a higher level.
* Cardinal arithmetic specifically for infinite cardinals (like `κ * κ = κ`) is in the file
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Ordinal.lean`.
* There is an instance `Pow Cardinal`, but this will only fire if Lean already knows that both
the base and the exponent live in the same universe. As a workaround, you can add
```
local infixr:80 " ^' " => @HPow.hPow Cardinal Cardinal Cardinal _
```
to a file. This notation will work even if Lean doesn't know yet that the base and the exponent
live in the same universe (but no exponents in other types can be used).
(Porting note: This last point might need to be updated.)
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
open scoped Classical
open Function Set Order
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {α β : Type u}
/-- The equivalence relation on types given by equivalence (bijective correspondence) of types.
Quotienting by this equivalence relation gives the cardinal numbers.
-/
instance Cardinal.isEquivalent : Setoid (Type u) where
r α β := Nonempty (α ≃ β)
iseqv := ⟨
fun α => ⟨Equiv.refl α⟩,
fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩,
fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align cardinal.is_equivalent Cardinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Cardinal.{u}` is the type of cardinal numbers in `Type u`,
defined as the quotient of `Type u` by existence of an equivalence
(a bijection with explicit inverse). -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Cardinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Cardinal.isEquivalent
#align cardinal Cardinal
namespace Cardinal
/-- The cardinal number of a type -/
def mk : Type u → Cardinal :=
Quotient.mk'
#align cardinal.mk Cardinal.mk
@[inherit_doc]
scoped prefix:max "#" => Cardinal.mk
instance canLiftCardinalType : CanLift Cardinal.{u} (Type u) mk fun _ => True :=
⟨fun c _ => Quot.inductionOn c fun α => ⟨α, rfl⟩⟩
#align cardinal.can_lift_cardinal_Type Cardinal.canLiftCardinalType
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : Cardinal → Prop} (c : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α, p #α) : p c :=
Quotient.inductionOn c h
#align cardinal.induction_on Cardinal.inductionOn
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(h : ∀ α β, p #α #β) : p c₁ c₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ c₁ c₂ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₂ Cardinal.inductionOn₂
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {p : Cardinal → Cardinal → Cardinal → Prop} (c₁ : Cardinal) (c₂ : Cardinal)
(c₃ : Cardinal) (h : ∀ α β γ, p #α #β #γ) : p c₁ c₂ c₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ c₁ c₂ c₃ h
#align cardinal.induction_on₃ Cardinal.inductionOn₃
protected theorem eq : #α = #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align cardinal.eq Cardinal.eq
@[simp]
theorem mk'_def (α : Type u) : @Eq Cardinal ⟦α⟧ #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_def Cardinal.mk'_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_out (c : Cardinal) : #c.out = c :=
Quotient.out_eq _
#align cardinal.mk_out Cardinal.mk_out
/-- The representative of the cardinal of a type is equivalent to the original type. -/
def outMkEquiv {α : Type v} : (#α).out ≃ α :=
Nonempty.some <| Cardinal.eq.mp (by simp)
#align cardinal.out_mk_equiv Cardinal.outMkEquiv
theorem mk_congr (e : α ≃ β) : #α = #β :=
Quot.sound ⟨e⟩
#align cardinal.mk_congr Cardinal.mk_congr
alias _root_.Equiv.cardinal_eq := mk_congr
#align equiv.cardinal_eq Equiv.cardinal_eq
/-- Lift a function between `Type*`s to a function between `Cardinal`s. -/
def map (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} :=
Quotient.map f fun α β ⟨e⟩ => ⟨hf α β e⟩
#align cardinal.map Cardinal.map
@[simp]
theorem map_mk (f : Type u → Type v) (hf : ∀ α β, α ≃ β → f α ≃ f β) (α : Type u) :
map f hf #α = #(f α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.map_mk Cardinal.map_mk
/-- Lift a binary operation `Type* → Type* → Type*` to a binary operation on `Cardinal`s. -/
def map₂ (f : Type u → Type v → Type w) (hf : ∀ α β γ δ, α ≃ β → γ ≃ δ → f α γ ≃ f β δ) :
Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{w} :=
Quotient.map₂ f fun α β ⟨e₁⟩ γ δ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨hf α β γ δ e₁ e₂⟩
#align cardinal.map₂ Cardinal.map₂
/-- The universe lift operation on cardinals. You can specify the universes explicitly with
`lift.{u v} : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v u}` -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (c : Cardinal.{v}) : Cardinal.{max v u} :=
map ULift.{u, v} (fun _ _ e => Equiv.ulift.trans <| e.trans Equiv.ulift.symm) c
#align cardinal.lift Cardinal.lift
@[simp]
theorem mk_uLift (α) : #(ULift.{v, u} α) = lift.{v} #α :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mk_ulift Cardinal.mk_uLift
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a => inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_umax Cardinal.lift_umax
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- `lift.{max v u, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax' : lift.{max v u, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
lift_umax
#align cardinal.lift_umax' Cardinal.lift_umax'
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels, but this is needed as simp lemma
-- further down in this file
/-- A cardinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_id' (a : Cardinal.{max u v}) : lift.{u} a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_congr Equiv.ulift
#align cardinal.lift_id' Cardinal.lift_id'
/-- A cardinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id (a : Cardinal) : lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_id Cardinal.lift_id
/-- A cardinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id'.{0, u} a
#align cardinal.lift_uzero Cardinal.lift_uzero
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift.{u_1} (a : Cardinal.{u_1}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.ulift.trans Equiv.ulift.symm).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.lift_lift Cardinal.lift_lift
/-- We define the order on cardinal numbers by `#α ≤ #β` if and only if
there exists an embedding (injective function) from α to β. -/
instance : LE Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun q₁ q₂ =>
Quotient.liftOn₂ q₁ q₂ (fun α β => Nonempty <| α ↪ β) fun _ _ _ _ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ =>
propext ⟨fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁ e₂⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.congr e₁.symm e₂.symm⟩⟩⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Cardinal.{u} where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.refl _⟩
le_trans := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩
le_antisymm := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩
exact Quotient.sound (e₁.antisymm e₂)
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.partialOrder with
le_total := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩
apply Embedding.total
decidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem le_def (α β : Type u) : #α ≤ #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
Iff.rfl
#align cardinal.le_def Cardinal.le_def
theorem mk_le_of_injective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_injective Cardinal.mk_le_of_injective
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.cardinal_le {α β : Type u} (f : α ↪ β) : #α ≤ #β :=
⟨f⟩
#align function.embedding.cardinal_le Function.Embedding.cardinal_le
theorem mk_le_of_surjective {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) : #β ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.ofSurjective f hf⟩
#align cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective Cardinal.mk_le_of_surjective
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_set {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} : c ≤ #α ↔ ∃ p : Set α, #p = c :=
⟨inductionOn c fun _ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ => ⟨Set.range f, (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).cardinal_eq.symm⟩,
fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e ▸ ⟨⟨Subtype.val, fun _ _ => Subtype.eq⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set Cardinal.le_mk_iff_exists_set
theorem mk_subtype_le {α : Type u} (p : α → Prop) : #(Subtype p) ≤ #α :=
⟨Embedding.subtype p⟩
#align cardinal.mk_subtype_le Cardinal.mk_subtype_le
theorem mk_set_le (s : Set α) : #s ≤ #α :=
mk_subtype_le s
#align cardinal.mk_set_le Cardinal.mk_set_le
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
theorem out_embedding {c c' : Cardinal} : c ≤ c' ↔ Nonempty (c.out ↪ c'.out) := by
trans
· rw [← Quotient.out_eq c, ← Quotient.out_eq c']
· rw [mk'_def, mk'_def, le_def]
#align cardinal.out_embedding Cardinal.out_embedding
theorem lift_mk_le {α : Type v} {β : Type w} :
lift.{max u w} #α ≤ lift.{max u v} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Embedding.congr Equiv.ulift.symm Equiv.ulift.symm f⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_le` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_le' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ↪ β) :=
lift_mk_le.{0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le' Cardinal.lift_mk_le'
theorem lift_mk_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} :
lift.{max v w} #α = lift.{max u w} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
Quotient.eq'.trans
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Equiv.ulift.symm.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨Equiv.ulift.trans <| f.trans Equiv.ulift.symm⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq Cardinal.lift_mk_eq
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.lift_mk_eq` with specialized universes.
Because Lean often can not realize it should use this specialization itself,
we provide this statement separately so you don't have to solve the specialization problem either.
-/
theorem lift_mk_eq' {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : lift.{v} #α = lift.{u} #β ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ β) :=
lift_mk_eq.{u, v, 0}
#align cardinal.lift_mk_eq' Cardinal.lift_mk_eq'
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_mk_le.{u}
#align cardinal.lift_le Cardinal.lift_le
-- Porting note: changed `simps` to `simps!` because the linter told to do so.
/-- `Cardinal.lift` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
@[simps! (config := .asFn)]
def liftOrderEmbedding : Cardinal.{v} ↪o Cardinal.{max v u} :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff lift.{u, v} fun _ _ => lift_le
#align cardinal.lift_order_embedding Cardinal.liftOrderEmbedding
theorem lift_injective : Injective lift.{u, v} :=
liftOrderEmbedding.injective
#align cardinal.lift_injective Cardinal.lift_injective
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a = lift.{v, u} b ↔ a = b :=
lift_injective.eq_iff
#align cardinal.lift_inj Cardinal.lift_inj
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : lift.{v, u} a < lift.{v, u} b ↔ a < b :=
liftOrderEmbedding.lt_iff_lt
#align cardinal.lift_lt Cardinal.lift_lt
theorem lift_strictMono : StrictMono lift := fun _ _ => lift_lt.2
#align cardinal.lift_strict_mono Cardinal.lift_strictMono
theorem lift_monotone : Monotone lift :=
lift_strictMono.monotone
#align cardinal.lift_monotone Cardinal.lift_monotone
instance : Zero Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PEmpty` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 0)⟩
instance : Inhabited Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨0⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_zero (α : Type u) [IsEmpty α] : #α = 0 :=
(Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero Cardinal.mk_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
#align cardinal.lift_zero Cardinal.lift_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_zero {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_zero
#align cardinal.lift_eq_zero Cardinal.lift_eq_zero
theorem mk_eq_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun e =>
let ⟨h⟩ := Quotient.exact e
h.isEmpty,
@mk_eq_zero α⟩
#align cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_eq_zero_iff
theorem mk_ne_zero_iff {α : Type u} : #α ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α :=
(not_iff_not.2 mk_eq_zero_iff).trans not_isEmpty_iff
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff Cardinal.mk_ne_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_ne_zero (α : Type u) [Nonempty α] : #α ≠ 0 :=
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ‹_›
#align cardinal.mk_ne_zero Cardinal.mk_ne_zero
instance : One Cardinal.{u} :=
-- `PUnit` might be more canonical, but this is convenient for defeq with natCast
⟨lift #(Fin 1)⟩
instance : Nontrivial Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, mk_ne_zero _⟩⟩
theorem mk_eq_one (α : Type u) [Unique α] : #α = 1 :=
(Equiv.equivOfUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))).cardinal_eq
#align cardinal.mk_eq_one Cardinal.mk_eq_one
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton Cardinal.le_one_iff_subsingleton
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
#align cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton Cardinal.mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
#align set.subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one
instance : Add Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Sum fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.sumCongr⟩
theorem add_def (α β : Type u) : #α + #β = #(Sum α β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.add_def Cardinal.add_def
instance : NatCast Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨fun n => lift #(Fin n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_sum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α ⊕ β) = lift.{v, u} #α + lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.sumCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_sum Cardinal.mk_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_option {α : Type u} : #(Option α) = #α + 1 := by
rw [(Equiv.optionEquivSumPUnit.{u, u} α).cardinal_eq, mk_sum, mk_eq_one PUnit, lift_id, lift_id]
#align cardinal.mk_option Cardinal.mk_option
@[simp]
theorem mk_psum (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(PSum α β) = lift.{v} #α + lift.{u} #β :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.psumEquivSum α β)).trans (mk_sum α β)
#align cardinal.mk_psum Cardinal.mk_psum
@[simp]
theorem mk_fintype (α : Type u) [h : Fintype α] : #α = Fintype.card α :=
mk_congr (Fintype.equivOfCardEq (by simp))
protected theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} (Fin (n+1))) = # (ULift.{u} (Fin n)) + 1
rw [← mk_option, mk_fintype, mk_fintype]
simp only [Fintype.card_ulift, Fintype.card_fin, Fintype.card_option]
instance : Mul Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ Prod fun _ _ _ _ => Equiv.prodCongr⟩
theorem mul_def (α β : Type u) : #α * #β = #(α × β) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.mul_def Cardinal.mul_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_prod (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α × β) = lift.{v, u} #α * lift.{u, v} #β :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_prod Cardinal.mk_prod
private theorem mul_comm' (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : a * b = b * a :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodComm α β
/-- The cardinal exponential. `#α ^ #β` is the cardinal of `β → α`. -/
instance instPowCardinal : Pow Cardinal.{u} Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨map₂ (fun α β => β → α) fun _ _ _ _ e₁ e₂ => e₂.arrowCongr e₁⟩
theorem power_def (α β : Type u) : #α ^ #β = #(β → α) :=
rfl
#align cardinal.power_def Cardinal.power_def
theorem mk_arrow (α : Type u) (β : Type v) : #(α → β) = (lift.{u} #β^lift.{v} #α) :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.symm.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.mk_arrow Cardinal.mk_arrow
@[simp]
theorem lift_power (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a ^ b) = lift.{v} a ^ lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.ulift.arrowCongr Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_power Cardinal.lift_power
@[simp]
theorem power_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.power_zero Cardinal.power_zero
@[simp]
theorem power_one {a : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^ (1 : Cardinal) = a :=
inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr (Equiv.funUnique (ULift.{u} (Fin 1)) α)
#align cardinal.power_one Cardinal.power_one
theorem power_add {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b + c) = a ^ b * a ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumArrowEquivProdArrow β γ α
#align cardinal.power_add Cardinal.power_add
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Cardinal.{u} where
zero := 0
one := 1
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
zero_add a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.emptySum (ULift (Fin 0)) α
add_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumEmpty α (ULift (Fin 0))
add_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumAssoc α β γ
add_comm a b := inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumComm α β
zero_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
mul_zero a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_eq_zero _
one_mul a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.uniqueProd α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_one a := inductionOn a fun α => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodUnique α (ULift (Fin 1))
mul_assoc a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodAssoc α β γ
mul_comm := mul_comm'
left_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.prodSumDistrib α β γ
right_distrib a b c := inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.sumProdDistrib α β γ
nsmul := nsmulRec
npow n c := c ^ (n : Cardinal)
npow_zero := @power_zero
npow_succ n c := show c ^ (↑(n + 1) : Cardinal) = c ^ (↑n : Cardinal) * c
by rw [Cardinal.cast_succ, power_add, power_one, mul_comm']
natCast := (fun n => lift.{u} #(Fin n) : ℕ → Cardinal.{u})
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := Cardinal.cast_succ
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit0 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit0 b = a ^ b * a ^ b :=
power_add
#align cardinal.power_bit0 Cardinal.power_bit0
@[deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem power_bit1 (a b : Cardinal) : a ^ bit1 b = a ^ b * a ^ b * a := by
rw [bit1, ← power_bit0, power_add, power_one]
#align cardinal.power_bit1 Cardinal.power_bit1
end deprecated
@[simp]
theorem one_power {a : Cardinal} : (1 : Cardinal) ^ a = 1 :=
inductionOn a fun _ => mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.one_power Cardinal.one_power
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_bool : #Bool = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_bool Cardinal.mk_bool
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem mk_Prop : #Prop = 2 := by simp
#align cardinal.mk_Prop Cardinal.mk_Prop
@[simp]
theorem zero_power {a : Cardinal} : a ≠ 0 → (0 : Cardinal) ^ a = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun _ heq =>
mk_eq_zero_iff.2 <|
isEmpty_pi.2 <|
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 heq
⟨a, inferInstance⟩
#align cardinal.zero_power Cardinal.zero_power
theorem power_ne_zero {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) : a ≠ 0 → a ^ b ≠ 0 :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ h =>
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 h
mk_ne_zero_iff.2 ⟨fun _ => a⟩
#align cardinal.power_ne_zero Cardinal.power_ne_zero
theorem mul_power {a b c : Cardinal} : (a * b) ^ c = a ^ c * b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.arrowProdEquivProdArrow α β γ
#align cardinal.mul_power Cardinal.mul_power
theorem power_mul {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^ (b * c) = (a ^ b) ^ c := by
rw [mul_comm b c]
exact inductionOn₃ a b c fun α β γ => mk_congr <| Equiv.curry γ β α
#align cardinal.power_mul Cardinal.power_mul
@[simp]
theorem pow_cast_right (a : Cardinal.{u}) (n : ℕ) : a ^ (↑n : Cardinal.{u}) = a ^ n :=
rfl
#align cardinal.pow_cast_right Cardinal.pow_cast_right
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
#align cardinal.lift_one Cardinal.lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_eq_one {a : Cardinal.{v}} : lift.{u} a = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
lift_injective.eq_iff' lift_one
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a + b) = lift.{v} a + lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.sumCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_add Cardinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : lift.{v} (a * b) = lift.{v} a * lift.{v} b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.ulift.trans (Equiv.prodCongr Equiv.ulift Equiv.ulift).symm
#align cardinal.lift_mul Cardinal.lift_mul
/-! Porting note (#11229): Deprecated section. Remove. -/
section deprecated
set_option linter.deprecated false
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit0 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit0 a) = bit0 (lift.{v} a) :=
lift_add a a
#align cardinal.lift_bit0 Cardinal.lift_bit0
@[simp, deprecated (since := "2023-02-11")]
theorem lift_bit1 (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (bit1 a) = bit1 (lift.{v} a) := by simp [bit1]
#align cardinal.lift_bit1 Cardinal.lift_bit1
end deprecated
-- Porting note: Proof used to be simp, needed to remind simp that 1 + 1 = 2
theorem lift_two : lift.{u, v} 2 = 2 := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two Cardinal.lift_two
@[simp]
theorem mk_set {α : Type u} : #(Set α) = 2 ^ #α := by simp [← one_add_one_eq_two, Set, mk_arrow]
#align cardinal.mk_set Cardinal.mk_set
/-- A variant of `Cardinal.mk_set` expressed in terms of a `Set` instead of a `Type`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mk_powerset {α : Type u} (s : Set α) : #(↥(𝒫 s)) = 2 ^ #(↥s) :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.Set.powerset s)).trans mk_set
#align cardinal.mk_powerset Cardinal.mk_powerset
theorem lift_two_power (a : Cardinal) : lift.{v} (2 ^ a) = 2 ^ lift.{v} a := by
simp [← one_add_one_eq_two]
#align cardinal.lift_two_power Cardinal.lift_two_power
section OrderProperties
open Sum
protected theorem zero_le : ∀ a : Cardinal, 0 ≤ a := by
rintro ⟨α⟩
exact ⟨Embedding.ofIsEmpty⟩
#align cardinal.zero_le Cardinal.zero_le
private theorem add_le_add' : ∀ {a b c d : Cardinal}, a ≤ b → c ≤ d → a + c ≤ b + d := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ ⟨δ⟩ ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩; exact ⟨e₁.sumMap e₂⟩
-- #align cardinal.add_le_add' Cardinal.add_le_add'
instance add_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => add_le_add' le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_covariant_class Cardinal.add_covariantClass
instance add_swap_covariantClass : CovariantClass Cardinal Cardinal (swap (· + ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ h => add_le_add' h le_rfl⟩
#align cardinal.add_swap_covariant_class Cardinal.add_swap_covariantClass
instance canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring : CanonicallyOrderedCommSemiring Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.partialOrder with
bot := 0
bot_le := Cardinal.zero_le
add_le_add_left := fun a b => add_le_add_left
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
have : Sum α ((range f)ᶜ : Set β) ≃ β :=
(Equiv.sumCongr (Equiv.ofInjective f hf) (Equiv.refl _)).trans <|
Equiv.Set.sumCompl (range f)
⟨#(↥(range f)ᶜ), mk_congr this.symm⟩
le_self_add := fun a b => (add_zero a).ge.trans <| add_le_add_left (Cardinal.zero_le _) _
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := fun {a b} =>
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
simpa only [mul_def, mk_eq_zero_iff, isEmpty_prod] using id }
instance : CanonicallyLinearOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring, Cardinal.linearOrder with }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
instance : LinearOrderedCommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.commSemiring,
Cardinal.linearOrder with
mul_le_mul_left := @mul_le_mul_left' _ _ _ _
zero_le_one := zero_le _ }
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoidWithZero Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
-- Porting note: new
-- Computable instance to prevent a non-computable one being found via the one above
instance : CommMonoid Cardinal.{u} :=
{ Cardinal.canonicallyOrderedCommSemiring with }
theorem zero_power_le (c : Cardinal.{u}) : (0 : Cardinal.{u}) ^ c ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : c = 0
· rw [h, power_zero]
· rw [zero_power h]
apply zero_le
#align cardinal.zero_power_le Cardinal.zero_power_le
theorem power_le_power_left : ∀ {a b c : Cardinal}, a ≠ 0 → b ≤ c → a ^ b ≤ a ^ c := by
rintro ⟨α⟩ ⟨β⟩ ⟨γ⟩ hα ⟨e⟩
let ⟨a⟩ := mk_ne_zero_iff.1 hα
exact ⟨@Function.Embedding.arrowCongrLeft _ _ _ ⟨a⟩ e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_left Cardinal.power_le_power_left
theorem self_le_power (a : Cardinal) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a ≤ a ^ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· exact zero_le _
· convert power_le_power_left ha hb
exact power_one.symm
#align cardinal.self_le_power Cardinal.self_le_power
/-- **Cantor's theorem** -/
theorem cantor (a : Cardinal.{u}) : a < 2 ^ a := by
induction' a using Cardinal.inductionOn with α
rw [← mk_set]
refine ⟨⟨⟨singleton, fun a b => singleton_eq_singleton_iff.1⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩
exact cantor_injective f hf
#align cardinal.cantor Cardinal.cantor
instance : NoMaxOrder Cardinal.{u} where exists_gt a := ⟨_, cantor a⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : DistribLattice Cardinal.{u} := inferInstance
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
#align cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial Cardinal.one_lt_iff_nontrivial
theorem power_le_max_power_one {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^ b ≤ max (a ^ c) 1 := by
by_cases ha : a = 0
· simp [ha, zero_power_le]
· exact (power_le_power_left ha h).trans (le_max_left _ _)
#align cardinal.power_le_max_power_one Cardinal.power_le_max_power_one
theorem power_le_power_right {a b c : Cardinal} : a ≤ b → a ^ c ≤ b ^ c :=
inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨Embedding.arrowCongrRight e⟩
#align cardinal.power_le_power_right Cardinal.power_le_power_right
theorem power_pos {a : Cardinal} (b : Cardinal) (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a ^ b :=
(power_ne_zero _ ha.ne').bot_lt
#align cardinal.power_pos Cardinal.power_pos
end OrderProperties
protected theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a =>
by_contradiction fun h => by
let ι := { c : Cardinal // ¬Acc (· < ·) c }
let f : ι → Cardinal := Subtype.val
haveI hι : Nonempty ι := ⟨⟨_, h⟩⟩
obtain ⟨⟨c : Cardinal, hc : ¬Acc (· < ·) c⟩, ⟨h_1 : ∀ j, (f ⟨c, hc⟩).out ↪ (f j).out⟩⟩ :=
Embedding.min_injective fun i => (f i).out
refine hc (Acc.intro _ fun j h' => by_contradiction fun hj => h'.2 ?_)
have : #_ ≤ #_ := ⟨h_1 ⟨j, hj⟩⟩
simpa only [mk_out] using this⟩
#align cardinal.lt_wf Cardinal.lt_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨(· < ·), Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
-- Porting note: this no longer is automatically inferred.
instance : WellFoundedLT Cardinal.{u} :=
⟨Cardinal.lt_wf⟩
instance wo : @IsWellOrder Cardinal.{u} (· < ·) where
#align cardinal.wo Cardinal.wo
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Cardinal :=
IsWellOrder.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Cardinal.{u}) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
#align cardinal.Inf_empty Cardinal.sInf_empty
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- Note that the successor of `c` is not the same as `c + 1` except in the case of finite `c`. -/
instance : SuccOrder Cardinal :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun c => sInf { c' | c < c' })
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `by apply` in the next line
⟨by apply lt_of_lt_of_le <| csInf_mem <| exists_gt _,
-- Porting note used to be just `csInf_le'`
fun h ↦ csInf_le' h⟩
theorem succ_def (c : Cardinal) : succ c = sInf { c' | c < c' } :=
rfl
#align cardinal.succ_def Cardinal.succ_def
theorem succ_pos : ∀ c : Cardinal, 0 < succ c :=
bot_lt_succ
#align cardinal.succ_pos Cardinal.succ_pos
theorem succ_ne_zero (c : Cardinal) : succ c ≠ 0 :=
(succ_pos _).ne'
#align cardinal.succ_ne_zero Cardinal.succ_ne_zero
theorem add_one_le_succ (c : Cardinal.{u}) : c + 1 ≤ succ c := by
-- Porting note: rewrote the next three lines to avoid defeq abuse.
have : Set.Nonempty { c' | c < c' } := exists_gt c
simp_rw [succ_def, le_csInf_iff'' this, mem_setOf]
intro b hlt
rcases b, c with ⟨⟨β⟩, ⟨γ⟩⟩
cases' le_of_lt hlt with f
have : ¬Surjective f := fun hn => (not_le_of_lt hlt) (mk_le_of_surjective hn)
simp only [Surjective, not_forall] at this
rcases this with ⟨b, hb⟩
calc
#γ + 1 = #(Option γ) := mk_option.symm
_ ≤ #β := (f.optionElim b hb).cardinal_le
#align cardinal.add_one_le_succ Cardinal.add_one_le_succ
/-- A cardinal is a limit if it is not zero or a successor cardinal. Note that `ℵ₀` is a limit
cardinal by this definition, but `0` isn't.
Use `IsSuccLimit` if you want to include the `c = 0` case. -/
def IsLimit (c : Cardinal) : Prop :=
c ≠ 0 ∧ IsSuccLimit c
#align cardinal.is_limit Cardinal.IsLimit
protected theorem IsLimit.ne_zero {c} (h : IsLimit c) : c ≠ 0 :=
h.1
#align cardinal.is_limit.ne_zero Cardinal.IsLimit.ne_zero
protected theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {c} (h : IsLimit c) : IsSuccLimit c :=
h.2
#align cardinal.is_limit.is_succ_limit Cardinal.IsLimit.isSuccLimit
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {x c} (h : IsLimit c) : x < c → succ x < c :=
h.isSuccLimit.succ_lt
#align cardinal.is_limit.succ_lt Cardinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Cardinal) :=
isSuccLimit_bot
#align cardinal.is_succ_limit_zero Cardinal.isSuccLimit_zero
/-- The indexed sum of cardinals is the cardinality of the
indexed disjoint union, i.e. sigma type. -/
def sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
mk (Σi, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.sum Cardinal.sum
theorem le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) (i) : f i ≤ sum f := by
rw [← Quotient.out_eq (f i)]
exact ⟨⟨fun a => ⟨i, a⟩, fun a b h => by injection h⟩⟩
#align cardinal.le_sum Cardinal.le_sum
@[simp]
theorem mk_sigma {ι} (f : ι → Type*) : #(Σ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_sigma Cardinal.mk_sigma
@[simp]
theorem sum_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(sum fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{v} #ι * lift.{u} a :=
inductionOn a fun α =>
mk_congr <|
calc
(Σ _ : ι, Quotient.out #α) ≃ ι × Quotient.out #α := Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _
_ ≃ ULift ι × ULift α := Equiv.ulift.symm.prodCongr (outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.sum_const Cardinal.sum_const
theorem sum_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (sum fun _ : ι => a) = #ι * a := by simp
#align cardinal.sum_const' Cardinal.sum_const'
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) : sum (f + g) = sum f + sum g := by
have := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaSumDistrib (Quotient.out ∘ f) (Quotient.out ∘ g))
simp only [comp_apply, mk_sigma, mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id] at this
exact this
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib Cardinal.sum_add_distrib
@[simp]
theorem sum_add_distrib' {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) :
(Cardinal.sum fun i => f i + g i) = sum f + sum g :=
sum_add_distrib f g
#align cardinal.sum_add_distrib' Cardinal.sum_add_distrib'
@[simp]
theorem lift_sum {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
Cardinal.lift.{w} (Cardinal.sum f) = Cardinal.sum fun i => Cardinal.lift.{w} (f i) :=
Equiv.cardinal_eq <|
Equiv.ulift.trans <|
Equiv.sigmaCongrRight fun a =>
-- Porting note: Inserted universe hint .{_,_,v} below
Nonempty.some <| by rw [← lift_mk_eq.{_,_,v}, mk_out, mk_out, lift_lift]
#align cardinal.lift_sum Cardinal.lift_sum
theorem sum_le_sum {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : sum f ≤ sum g :=
⟨(Embedding.refl _).sigmaMap fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← Quot.out_eq (f i), ← Quot.out_eq (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.sum_le_sum Cardinal.sum_le_sum
theorem mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le {c : Cardinal} (f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) :
#α ≤ #β * c := by
simpa only [← mk_congr (@Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv α β f), mk_sigma, ← sum_const'] using
sum_le_sum _ _ hf
#align cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le
theorem lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {c : Cardinal}
(f : α → β) (hf : ∀ b : β, lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' {b}) ≤ c) : lift.{v} #α ≤ lift.{u} #β * c :=
(mk_le_mk_mul_of_mk_preimage_le fun x : ULift.{v} α => ULift.up.{u} (f x.1)) <|
ULift.forall.2 fun b =>
(mk_congr <|
(Equiv.ulift.image _).trans
(Equiv.trans
(by
rw [Equiv.image_eq_preimage]
/- Porting note: Need to insert the following `have` b/c bad fun coercion
behaviour for Equivs -/
have : DFunLike.coe (Equiv.symm (Equiv.ulift (α := α))) = ULift.up (α := α) := rfl
rw [this]
simp only [preimage, mem_singleton_iff, ULift.up_inj, mem_setOf_eq, coe_setOf]
exact Equiv.refl _)
Equiv.ulift.symm)).trans_le
(hf b)
#align cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le Cardinal.lift_mk_le_lift_mk_mul_of_lift_mk_preimage_le
/-- The range of an indexed cardinal function, whose outputs live in a higher universe than the
inputs, is always bounded above. -/
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
⟨_, by
rintro a ⟨i, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: Added universe reference below
exact le_sum.{v,u} f i⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range Cardinal.bddAbove_range
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Set.Iio a) :=
small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun x h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
suffices (range fun x : ι => (e.symm x).1) = s by
rw [← this]
apply bddAbove_range.{u, u}
ext x
refine ⟨?_, fun hx => ⟨e ⟨x, hx⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
exact (e.symm a).2
· simp_rw [Equiv.symm_apply_apply]⟩
#align cardinal.bdd_above_iff_small Cardinal.bddAbove_iff_small
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
#align cardinal.bdd_above_of_small Cardinal.bddAbove_of_small
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
-- Porting note: added universes below
exact small_lift.{_,v,_} _
#align cardinal.bdd_above_image Cardinal.bddAbove_image
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image.{v,w} g hf
#align cardinal.bdd_above_range_comp Cardinal.bddAbove_range_comp
theorem iSup_le_sum {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : iSup f ≤ sum f :=
ciSup_le' <| le_sum.{u_2,u_1} _
#align cardinal.supr_le_sum Cardinal.iSup_le_sum
-- Porting note: Added universe hint .{v,_} below
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v,_} #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_range.{u, v} f)
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr_lift Cardinal.sum_le_iSup_lift
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
#align cardinal.sum_le_supr Cardinal.sum_le_iSup
theorem sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ (f : ℕ → Cardinal.{u}) :
Cardinal.sum f = f 0 + Cardinal.sum fun i => f (i + 1) := by
refine (Equiv.sigmaNatSucc fun i => Quotient.out (f i)).cardinal_eq.trans ?_
simp only [mk_sum, mk_out, lift_id, mk_sigma]
#align cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ Cardinal.sum_nat_eq_add_sum_succ
-- Porting note: LFS is not in normal form.
-- @[simp]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
#align cardinal.supr_of_empty Cardinal.iSup_of_empty
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit
{ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (ω : Cardinal.{v})
(hω : ¬ Order.IsSuccLimit ω)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
subst h
refine (isLUB_csSup' ?_).exists_of_not_isSuccLimit hω
contrapose! hω with hf
rw [iSup, csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf, csSup_empty]
exact Order.isSuccLimit_bot
lemma exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isLimit
{ι : Type u} [hι : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v}) (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(ω : Cardinal.{v}) (hω : ¬ ω.IsLimit)
(h : ⨆ i : ι, f i = ω) : ∃ i, f i = ω := by
refine (not_and_or.mp hω).elim (fun e ↦ ⟨hι.some, ?_⟩)
(Cardinal.exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f ω · h)
cases not_not.mp e
rw [← le_zero_iff] at h ⊢
exact (le_ciSup hf _).trans h
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
-- Porting note: Added .{v,u,w} universe hint below
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax', lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
#align cardinal.lift_mk_shrink'' Cardinal.lift_mk_shrink''
/-- The indexed product of cardinals is the cardinality of the Pi type
(dependent product). -/
def prod {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal) : Cardinal :=
#(∀ i, (f i).out)
#align cardinal.prod Cardinal.prod
@[simp]
theorem mk_pi {ι : Type u} (α : ι → Type v) : #(∀ i, α i) = prod fun i => #(α i) :=
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun _ => outMkEquiv.symm
#align cardinal.mk_pi Cardinal.mk_pi
@[simp]
theorem prod_const (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{v}) :
(prod fun _ : ι => a) = lift.{u} a ^ lift.{v} #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ =>
mk_congr <| Equiv.piCongr Equiv.ulift.symm fun _ => outMkEquiv.trans Equiv.ulift.symm
#align cardinal.prod_const Cardinal.prod_const
theorem prod_const' (ι : Type u) (a : Cardinal.{u}) : (prod fun _ : ι => a) = a ^ #ι :=
inductionOn a fun _ => (mk_pi _).symm
#align cardinal.prod_const' Cardinal.prod_const'
theorem prod_le_prod {ι} (f g : ι → Cardinal) (H : ∀ i, f i ≤ g i) : prod f ≤ prod g :=
⟨Embedding.piCongrRight fun i =>
Classical.choice <| by have := H i; rwa [← mk_out (f i), ← mk_out (g i)] at this⟩
#align cardinal.prod_le_prod Cardinal.prod_le_prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_eq_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : prod f = 0 ↔ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
lift f to ι → Type u using fun _ => trivial
simp only [mk_eq_zero_iff, ← mk_pi, isEmpty_pi]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_zero Cardinal.prod_eq_zero
theorem prod_ne_zero {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : prod f ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i ≠ 0 := by simp [prod_eq_zero]
#align cardinal.prod_ne_zero Cardinal.prod_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem lift_prod {ι : Type u} (c : ι → Cardinal.{v}) :
lift.{w} (prod c) = prod fun i => lift.{w} (c i) := by
lift c to ι → Type v using fun _ => trivial
simp only [← mk_pi, ← mk_uLift]
exact mk_congr (Equiv.ulift.trans <| Equiv.piCongrRight fun i => Equiv.ulift.symm)
#align cardinal.lift_prod Cardinal.lift_prod
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax'.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
#align cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype Cardinal.prod_eq_of_fintype
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u,v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
#align cardinal.lift_Inf Cardinal.lift_sInf
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u,v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u,v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
#align cardinal.lift_infi Cardinal.lift_iInf
theorem lift_down {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a → ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α β => by
rw [← lift_id #β, ← lift_umax, ← lift_umax.{u, v}, lift_mk_le.{v}]
exact fun ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨#(Set.range f),
Eq.symm <| lift_mk_eq.{_, _, v}.2
⟨Function.Embedding.equivOfSurjective (Embedding.codRestrict _ f Set.mem_range_self)
fun ⟨a, ⟨b, e⟩⟩ => ⟨b, Subtype.eq e⟩⟩⟩
#align cardinal.lift_down Cardinal.lift_down
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' ≤ a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h
⟨a', e, lift_le.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_le.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.le_lift_iff Cardinal.le_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v,u} a ↔ ∃ a', lift.{v,u} a' = b ∧ a' < a :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨a', e⟩ := lift_down h.le
⟨a', e, lift_lt.1 <| e.symm ▸ h⟩,
fun ⟨_, e, h⟩ => e ▸ lift_lt.2 h⟩
#align cardinal.lt_lift_iff Cardinal.lt_lift_iff
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a) : lift.{v,u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{v,u} a) :=
le_antisymm
(le_of_not_gt fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨b, e, h⟩
rw [lt_succ_iff, ← lift_le, e] at h
exact h.not_lt (lt_succ _))
(succ_le_of_lt <| lift_lt.2 <| lt_succ a)
#align cardinal.lift_succ Cardinal.lift_succ
-- Porting note: simpNF is not happy with universe levels.
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem lift_umax_eq {a : Cardinal.{u}} {b : Cardinal.{v}} :
lift.{max v w} a = lift.{max u w} b ↔ lift.{v} a = lift.{u} b := by
rw [← lift_lift.{v, w, u}, ← lift_lift.{u, w, v}, lift_inj]
#align cardinal.lift_umax_eq Cardinal.lift_umax_eq
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_min {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (min a b) = min (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_min
#align cardinal.lift_min Cardinal.lift_min
-- Porting note: Inserted .{u,v} below
@[simp]
theorem lift_max {a b : Cardinal} : lift.{u,v} (max a b) = max (lift.{u,v} a) (lift.{u,v} b) :=
lift_monotone.map_max
#align cardinal.lift_max Cardinal.lift_max
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,209 | 1,219 | theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by |
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.lift_down (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex J. Best, Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Norm
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Norm
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Complex
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.Basic
#align_import number_theory.number_field.embeddings from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"caa58cbf5bfb7f81ccbaca4e8b8ac4bc2b39cc1c"
/-!
# Embeddings of number fields
This file defines the embeddings of a number field into an algebraic closed field.
## Main Definitions and Results
* `NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly`: let `x ∈ K` with `K` number field and
let `A` be an algebraic closed field of char. 0, then the images of `x` by the embeddings of `K`
in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`.
* `NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one`: an algebraic integer whose conjugates are
all of norm one is a root of unity.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace`: the type of infinite places of a number field `K`.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff`: two complex embeddings define the same infinite place iff
they are equal or complex conjugates.
* `NumberField.InfinitePlace.prod_eq_abs_norm`: the infinite part of the product formula, that is
for `x ∈ K`, we have `Π_w ‖x‖_w = |norm(x)|` where the product is over the infinite place `w` and
`‖·‖_w` is the normalized absolute value for `w`.
## Tags
number field, embeddings, places, infinite places
-/
open scoped Classical
namespace NumberField.Embeddings
section Fintype
open FiniteDimensional
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
/-- There are finitely many embeddings of a number field. -/
noncomputable instance : Fintype (K →+* A) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv (K →ₐ[ℚ] A) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm
variable [IsAlgClosed A]
/-- The number of embeddings of a number field is equal to its finrank. -/
theorem card : Fintype.card (K →+* A) = finrank ℚ K := by
rw [Fintype.ofEquiv_card RingHom.equivRatAlgHom.symm, AlgHom.card]
#align number_field.embeddings.card NumberField.Embeddings.card
instance : Nonempty (K →+* A) := by
rw [← Fintype.card_pos_iff, NumberField.Embeddings.card K A]
exact FiniteDimensional.finrank_pos
end Fintype
section Roots
open Set Polynomial
variable (K A : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K] [Field A] [Algebra ℚ A] [IsAlgClosed A] (x : K)
/-- Let `A` be an algebraically closed field and let `x ∈ K`, with `K` a number field.
The images of `x` by the embeddings of `K` in `A` are exactly the roots in `A` of
the minimal polynomial of `x` over `ℚ`. -/
theorem range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly :
(range fun φ : K →+* A => φ x) = (minpoly ℚ x).rootSet A := by
convert (NumberField.isAlgebraic K).range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly A x using 1
ext a
exact ⟨fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRatAlgHom, hφ⟩, fun ⟨φ, hφ⟩ => ⟨φ.toRingHom, hφ⟩⟩
#align number_field.embeddings.range_eval_eq_root_set_minpoly NumberField.Embeddings.range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly
end Roots
section Bounded
open FiniteDimensional Polynomial Set
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [NumberField K]
variable {A : Type*} [NormedField A] [IsAlgClosed A] [NormedAlgebra ℚ A]
theorem coeff_bdd_of_norm_le {B : ℝ} {x : K} (h : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B) (i : ℕ) :
‖(minpoly ℚ x).coeff i‖ ≤ max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2) := by
have hx := IsSeparable.isIntegral ℚ x
rw [← norm_algebraMap' A, ← coeff_map (algebraMap ℚ A)]
refine coeff_bdd_of_roots_le _ (minpoly.monic hx)
(IsAlgClosed.splits_codomain _) (minpoly.natDegree_le x) (fun z hz => ?_) i
classical
rw [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] at hz
obtain ⟨φ, rfl⟩ := (range_eval_eq_rootSet_minpoly K A x).symm.subset hz
exact h φ
#align number_field.embeddings.coeff_bdd_of_norm_le NumberField.Embeddings.coeff_bdd_of_norm_le
variable (K A)
/-- Let `B` be a real number. The set of algebraic integers in `K` whose conjugates are all
smaller in norm than `B` is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_norm_le (B : ℝ) : {x : K | IsIntegral ℤ x ∧ ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ ≤ B}.Finite := by
let C := Nat.ceil (max B 1 ^ finrank ℚ K * (finrank ℚ K).choose (finrank ℚ K / 2))
have := bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ K) (finrank ℚ K) (finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)
refine this.subset fun x hx => ?_; simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
have h_map_ℚ_minpoly := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx.1
refine ⟨_, ⟨?_, fun i => ?_⟩, mem_rootSet.2 ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx.1, minpoly.aeval ℤ x⟩⟩
· rw [← (minpoly.monic hx.1).natDegree_map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ), ← h_map_ℚ_minpoly]
exact minpoly.natDegree_le x
rw [mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| coeff_bdd_of_norm_le hx.2 i).trans (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [h_map_ℚ_minpoly, coeff_map, eq_intCast, Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
#align number_field.embeddings.finite_of_norm_le NumberField.Embeddings.finite_of_norm_le
/-- An algebraic integer whose conjugates are all of norm one is a root of unity. -/
theorem pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one {x : K} (hxi : IsIntegral ℤ x) (hx : ∀ φ : K →+* A, ‖φ x‖ = 1) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (_ : 0 < n), x ^ n = 1 := by
obtain ⟨a, -, b, -, habne, h⟩ :=
@Set.Infinite.exists_ne_map_eq_of_mapsTo _ _ _ _ (x ^ · : ℕ → K) Set.infinite_univ
(by exact fun a _ => ⟨hxi.pow a, fun φ => by simp [hx φ]⟩) (finite_of_norm_le K A (1 : ℝ))
wlog hlt : b < a
· exact this K A hxi hx b a habne.symm h.symm (habne.lt_or_lt.resolve_right hlt)
refine ⟨a - b, tsub_pos_of_lt hlt, ?_⟩
rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hlt.le, pow_add, mul_left_eq_self₀] at h
refine h.resolve_right fun hp => ?_
specialize hx (IsAlgClosed.lift (R := ℚ)).toRingHom
rw [pow_eq_zero hp, map_zero, norm_zero] at hx; norm_num at hx
#align number_field.embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one NumberField.Embeddings.pow_eq_one_of_norm_eq_one
end Bounded
end NumberField.Embeddings
section Place
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {A : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing A] [Nontrivial A] (φ : K →+* A)
/-- An embedding into a normed division ring defines a place of `K` -/
def NumberField.place : AbsoluteValue K ℝ :=
(IsAbsoluteValue.toAbsoluteValue (norm : A → ℝ)).comp φ.injective
#align number_field.place NumberField.place
@[simp]
theorem NumberField.place_apply (x : K) : (NumberField.place φ) x = norm (φ x) := rfl
#align number_field.place_apply NumberField.place_apply
end Place
namespace NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
open Complex NumberField
open scoped ComplexConjugate
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] {k : Type*} [Field k]
/-- The conjugate of a complex embedding as a complex embedding. -/
abbrev conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : K →+* ℂ := star φ
#align number_field.complex_embedding.conjugate NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.conjugate
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_coe_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (conjugate φ) x = conj (φ x) := rfl
#align number_field.complex_embedding.conjugate_coe_eq NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq
theorem place_conjugate (φ : K →+* ℂ) : place (conjugate φ) = place φ := by
ext; simp only [place_apply, norm_eq_abs, abs_conj, conjugate_coe_eq]
#align number_field.complex_embedding.place_conjugate NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.place_conjugate
/-- An embedding into `ℂ` is real if it is fixed by complex conjugation. -/
abbrev IsReal (φ : K →+* ℂ) : Prop := IsSelfAdjoint φ
#align number_field.complex_embedding.is_real NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.IsReal
theorem isReal_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal φ ↔ conjugate φ = φ := isSelfAdjoint_iff
#align number_field.complex_embedding.is_real_iff NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff
theorem isReal_conjugate_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} : IsReal (conjugate φ) ↔ IsReal φ :=
IsSelfAdjoint.star_iff
#align number_field.complex_embedding.is_real_conjugate_iff NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.isReal_conjugate_iff
/-- A real embedding as a ring homomorphism from `K` to `ℝ` . -/
def IsReal.embedding {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) : K →+* ℝ where
toFun x := (φ x).re
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_re]
map_mul' := by
simp only [Complex.conj_eq_iff_im.mp (RingHom.congr_fun hφ _), map_mul, mul_re,
mul_zero, tsub_zero, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
map_zero' := by simp only [map_zero, zero_re]
map_add' := by simp only [map_add, add_re, eq_self_iff_true, forall_const]
#align number_field.complex_embedding.is_real.embedding NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.embedding
@[simp]
theorem IsReal.coe_embedding_apply {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) (x : K) :
(hφ.embedding x : ℂ) = φ x := by
apply Complex.ext
· rfl
· rw [ofReal_im, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im]
exact RingHom.congr_fun hφ x
#align number_field.complex_embedding.is_real.coe_embedding_apply NumberField.ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.coe_embedding_apply
lemma IsReal.comp (f : k →+* K) {φ : K →+* ℂ} (hφ : IsReal φ) :
IsReal (φ.comp f) := by ext1 x; simpa using RingHom.congr_fun hφ (f x)
lemma isReal_comp_iff {f : k ≃+* K} {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (φ.comp (f : k →+* K)) ↔ IsReal φ :=
⟨fun H ↦ by convert H.comp f.symm.toRingHom; ext1; simp, IsReal.comp _⟩
lemma exists_comp_symm_eq_of_comp_eq [Algebra k K] [IsGalois k K] (φ ψ : K →+* ℂ)
(h : φ.comp (algebraMap k K) = ψ.comp (algebraMap k K)) :
∃ σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K, φ.comp σ.symm = ψ := by
letI := (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)).toAlgebra
letI := φ.toAlgebra
have : IsScalarTower k K ℂ := IsScalarTower.of_algebraMap_eq' rfl
let ψ' : K →ₐ[k] ℂ := { ψ with commutes' := fun r ↦ (RingHom.congr_fun h r).symm }
use (AlgHom.restrictNormal' ψ' K).symm
ext1 x
exact AlgHom.restrictNormal_commutes ψ' K x
variable [Algebra k K] (φ : K →+* ℂ) (σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K)
/--
`IsConj φ σ` states that `σ : K ≃ₐ[k] K` is the conjugation under the embedding `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
-/
def IsConj : Prop := conjugate φ = φ.comp σ
variable {φ σ}
lemma IsConj.eq (h : IsConj φ σ) (x) : φ (σ x) = star (φ x) := RingHom.congr_fun h.symm x
lemma IsConj.ext {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) (h₂ : IsConj φ σ₂) : σ₁ = σ₂ :=
AlgEquiv.ext fun x ↦ φ.injective ((h₁.eq x).trans (h₂.eq x).symm)
lemma IsConj.ext_iff {σ₁ σ₂ : K ≃ₐ[k] K} (h₁ : IsConj φ σ₁) : σ₁ = σ₂ ↔ IsConj φ σ₂ :=
⟨fun e ↦ e ▸ h₁, h₁.ext⟩
lemma IsConj.isReal_comp (h : IsConj φ σ) : IsReal (φ.comp (algebraMap k K)) := by
ext1 x
simp only [conjugate_coe_eq, RingHom.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ← h.eq,
starRingEnd_apply, AlgEquiv.commutes]
lemma isConj_one_iff : IsConj φ (1 : K ≃ₐ[k] K) ↔ IsReal φ := Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsReal.isConjGal_one⟩ := ComplexEmbedding.isConj_one_iff
lemma IsConj.symm (hσ : IsConj φ σ) :
IsConj φ σ.symm := RingHom.ext fun x ↦ by simpa using congr_arg star (hσ.eq (σ.symm x))
lemma isConj_symm : IsConj φ σ.symm ↔ IsConj φ σ :=
⟨IsConj.symm, IsConj.symm⟩
end NumberField.ComplexEmbedding
section InfinitePlace
open NumberField
variable {k : Type*} [Field k] (K : Type*) [Field K] {F : Type*} [Field F]
/-- An infinite place of a number field `K` is a place associated to a complex embedding. -/
def NumberField.InfinitePlace := { w : AbsoluteValue K ℝ // ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, place φ = w }
#align number_field.infinite_place NumberField.InfinitePlace
instance [NumberField K] : Nonempty (NumberField.InfinitePlace K) := Set.instNonemptyRange _
variable {K}
/-- Return the infinite place defined by a complex embedding `φ`. -/
noncomputable def NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk (φ : K →+* ℂ) : NumberField.InfinitePlace K :=
⟨place φ, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩
#align number_field.infinite_place.mk NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk
namespace NumberField.InfinitePlace
open NumberField
instance {K : Type*} [Field K] : FunLike (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
coe w x := w.1 x
coe_injective' := fun _ _ h => Subtype.eq (AbsoluteValue.ext fun x => congr_fun h x)
instance : MonoidWithZeroHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
map_mul w _ _ := w.1.map_mul _ _
map_one w := w.1.map_one
map_zero w := w.1.map_zero
instance : NonnegHomClass (InfinitePlace K) K ℝ where
apply_nonneg w _ := w.1.nonneg _
@[simp]
theorem apply (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (mk φ) x = Complex.abs (φ x) := rfl
#align number_field.infinite_place.apply NumberField.InfinitePlace.apply
/-- For an infinite place `w`, return an embedding `φ` such that `w = infinite_place φ` . -/
noncomputable def embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : K →+* ℂ := w.2.choose
#align number_field.infinite_place.embedding NumberField.InfinitePlace.embedding
@[simp]
theorem mk_embedding (w : InfinitePlace K) : mk (embedding w) = w := Subtype.ext w.2.choose_spec
#align number_field.infinite_place.mk_embedding NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_embedding
@[simp]
theorem mk_conjugate_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) : mk (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) = mk φ := by
refine DFunLike.ext _ _ (fun x => ?_)
rw [apply, apply, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq, Complex.abs_conj]
#align number_field.infinite_place.mk_conjugate_eq NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_conjugate_eq
theorem norm_embedding_eq (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
‖(embedding w) x‖ = w x := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← mk_embedding w]
rfl
theorem eq_iff_eq (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x = r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ = r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
#align number_field.infinite_place.eq_iff_eq NumberField.InfinitePlace.eq_iff_eq
theorem le_iff_le (x : K) (r : ℝ) : (∀ w : InfinitePlace K, w x ≤ r) ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r :=
⟨fun hw φ => hw (mk φ), by rintro hφ ⟨w, ⟨φ, rfl⟩⟩; exact hφ φ⟩
#align number_field.infinite_place.le_iff_le NumberField.InfinitePlace.le_iff_le
theorem pos_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} {x : K} : 0 < w x ↔ x ≠ 0 := AbsoluteValue.pos_iff w.1
#align number_field.infinite_place.pos_iff NumberField.InfinitePlace.pos_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_iff {φ ψ : K →+* ℂ} : mk φ = mk ψ ↔ φ = ψ ∨ ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ = ψ := by
constructor
· -- We prove that the map ψ ∘ φ⁻¹ between φ(K) and ℂ is uniform continuous, thus it is either the
-- inclusion or the complex conjugation using `Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj`
intro h₀
obtain ⟨j, hiφ⟩ := (φ.injective).hasLeftInverse
let ι := RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse hiφ
have hlip : LipschitzWith 1 (RingHom.comp ψ ι.symm.toRingHom) := by
change LipschitzWith 1 (ψ ∘ ι.symm)
apply LipschitzWith.of_dist_le_mul
intro x y
rw [NNReal.coe_one, one_mul, NormedField.dist_eq, Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply,
← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply le_of_eq
suffices ‖φ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ = ‖ψ (ι.symm (x - y))‖ by
rw [← this, ← RingEquiv.ofLeftInverse_apply hiφ _, RingEquiv.apply_symm_apply ι _]
rfl
exact congrFun (congrArg (↑) h₀) _
cases
Complex.uniformContinuous_ringHom_eq_id_or_conj φ.fieldRange hlip.uniformContinuous with
| inl h =>
left; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
| inr h =>
right; ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← hiφ x]
exact (congrFun h (ι x)).symm
· rintro (⟨h⟩ | ⟨h⟩)
· exact congr_arg mk h
· rw [← mk_conjugate_eq]
exact congr_arg mk h
#align number_field.infinite_place.mk_eq_iff NumberField.InfinitePlace.mk_eq_iff
/-- An infinite place is real if it is defined by a real embedding. -/
def IsReal (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_real NumberField.InfinitePlace.IsReal
/-- An infinite place is complex if it is defined by a complex (ie. not real) embedding. -/
def IsComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : Prop := ∃ φ : K →+* ℂ, ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ ∧ mk φ = w
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_complex NumberField.InfinitePlace.IsComplex
theorem embedding_mk_eq (φ : K →+* ℂ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ ∨ embedding (mk φ) = ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ := by
rw [@eq_comm _ _ φ, @eq_comm _ _ (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ), ← mk_eq_iff, mk_embedding]
@[simp]
theorem embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ) :
embedding (mk φ) = φ := by
have := embedding_mk_eq φ
rwa [ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp h, or_self] at this
#align number_field.complex_embeddings.is_real.embedding_mk NumberField.InfinitePlace.embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal
theorem isReal_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsReal w ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
rwa [embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ]
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_real_iff NumberField.InfinitePlace.isReal_iff
theorem isComplex_iff {w : InfinitePlace K} :
IsComplex w ↔ ¬ComplexEmbedding.IsReal (embedding w) := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨embedding w, h, mk_embedding w⟩⟩
rintro ⟨φ, ⟨hφ, rfl⟩⟩
contrapose! hφ
cases mk_eq_iff.mp (mk_embedding (mk φ)) with
| inl h => rwa [h] at hφ
| inr h => rwa [← ComplexEmbedding.isReal_conjugate_iff, h] at hφ
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_complex_iff NumberField.InfinitePlace.isComplex_iff
@[simp]
theorem conjugate_embedding_eq_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) :
ComplexEmbedding.conjugate (embedding w) = embedding w :=
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mpr (isReal_iff.mp h)
@[simp]
theorem not_isReal_iff_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsReal w ↔ IsComplex w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff]
#align number_field.infinite_place.not_is_real_iff_is_complex NumberField.InfinitePlace.not_isReal_iff_isComplex
@[simp]
theorem not_isComplex_iff_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} : ¬IsComplex w ↔ IsReal w := by
rw [isComplex_iff, isReal_iff, not_not]
theorem isReal_or_isComplex (w : InfinitePlace K) : IsReal w ∨ IsComplex w := by
rw [← not_isReal_iff_isComplex]; exact em _
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_real_or_is_complex NumberField.InfinitePlace.isReal_or_isComplex
theorem ne_of_isReal_isComplex {w w' : InfinitePlace K} (h : IsReal w) (h' : IsComplex w') :
w ≠ w' := fun h_eq ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr h' (h_eq ▸ h)
variable (K) in
theorem disjoint_isReal_isComplex :
Disjoint {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsReal w} {(w : InfinitePlace K) | IsComplex w} :=
Set.disjoint_iff.2 <| fun _ hw ↦ not_isReal_iff_isComplex.2 hw.2 hw.1
/-- The real embedding associated to a real infinite place. -/
noncomputable def embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) : K →+* ℝ :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.embedding (isReal_iff.mp hw)
#align number_field.infinite_place.is_real.embedding NumberField.InfinitePlace.embedding_of_isReal
@[simp]
theorem embedding_of_isReal_apply {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
((embedding_of_isReal hw) x : ℂ) = (embedding w) x :=
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal.coe_embedding_apply (isReal_iff.mp hw) x
theorem norm_embedding_of_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : K) :
‖embedding_of_isReal hw x‖ = w x := by
rw [← norm_embedding_eq, ← embedding_of_isReal_apply hw, Complex.norm_real]
@[simp]
theorem isReal_of_mk_isReal {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsReal (mk φ)) :
ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by
contrapose! h
rw [not_isReal_iff_isComplex]
exact ⟨φ, h, rfl⟩
lemma isReal_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsReal (mk φ) ↔ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
⟨isReal_of_mk_isReal, fun H ↦ ⟨_, H, rfl⟩⟩
lemma isComplex_mk_iff {φ : K →+* ℂ} :
IsComplex (mk φ) ↔ ¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ :=
not_isReal_iff_isComplex.symm.trans isReal_mk_iff.not
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Embeddings.lean | 451 | 452 | theorem not_isReal_of_mk_isComplex {φ : K →+* ℂ} (h : IsComplex (mk φ)) :
¬ ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ := by | rwa [← isComplex_mk_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicNumbers
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DiscreteValuationRing.Basic
#align_import number_theory.padics.padic_integers from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# p-adic integers
This file defines the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` as the subtype of `ℚ_[p]` with norm `≤ 1`.
We show that `ℤ_[p]`
* is complete,
* is nonarchimedean,
* is a normed ring,
* is a local ring, and
* is a discrete valuation ring.
The relation between `ℤ_[p]` and `ZMod p` is established in another file.
## Important definitions
* `PadicInt` : the type of `p`-adic integers
## Notation
We introduce the notation `ℤ_[p]` for the `p`-adic integers.
## Implementation notes
Much, but not all, of this file assumes that `p` is prime. This assumption is inferred automatically
by taking `[Fact p.Prime]` as a type class argument.
Coercions into `ℤ_[p]` are set up to work with the `norm_cast` tactic.
## References
* [F. Q. Gouvêa, *p-adic numbers*][gouvea1997]
* [R. Y. Lewis, *A formal proof of Hensel's lemma over the p-adic integers*][lewis2019]
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P-adic_number>
## Tags
p-adic, p adic, padic, p-adic integer
-/
open Padic Metric LocalRing
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
/-- The `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]` are the `p`-adic numbers with norm `≤ 1`. -/
def PadicInt (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime] :=
{ x : ℚ_[p] // ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
#align padic_int PadicInt
/-- The ring of `p`-adic integers. -/
notation "ℤ_[" p "]" => PadicInt p
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Ring structure and coercion to `ℚ_[p]` -/
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Coe ℤ_[p] ℚ_[p] :=
⟨Subtype.val⟩
theorem ext {x y : ℤ_[p]} : (x : ℚ_[p]) = y → x = y :=
Subtype.ext
#align padic_int.ext PadicInt.ext
variable (p)
/-- The `p`-adic integers as a subring of `ℚ_[p]`. -/
def subring : Subring ℚ_[p] where
carrier := { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 }
zero_mem' := by set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
one_mem' := by set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num
add_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _).trans <| max_le_iff.2 ⟨hx, hy⟩
mul_mem' hx hy := (padicNormE.mul _ _).trans_le <| mul_le_one hx (norm_nonneg _) hy
neg_mem' hx := (norm_neg _).trans_le hx
#align padic_int.subring PadicInt.subring
@[simp]
theorem mem_subring_iff {x : ℚ_[p]} : x ∈ subring p ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ 1 := Iff.rfl
#align padic_int.mem_subring_iff PadicInt.mem_subring_iff
variable {p}
/-- Addition on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Add ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Add (subring p))
/-- Multiplication on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Mul ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Mul (subring p))
/-- Negation on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Neg ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Neg (subring p))
/-- Subtraction on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Sub ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Sub (subring p))
/-- Zero on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : Zero ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : Zero (subring p))
instance : Inhabited ℤ_[p] := ⟨0⟩
/-- One on `ℤ_[p]` is inherited from `ℚ_[p]`. -/
instance : One ℤ_[p] := ⟨⟨1, by norm_num⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero {h} : (⟨0, h⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = (0 : ℤ_[p]) := rfl
#align padic_int.mk_zero PadicInt.mk_zero
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 + z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 + z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_add PadicInt.coe_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 * z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 * z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_mul PadicInt.coe_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg (z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ((-z1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = -z1 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_neg PadicInt.coe_neg
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ((z1 - z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z1 - z2 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_sub PadicInt.coe_sub
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_one : ((1 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 1 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_one PadicInt.coe_one
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = 0 := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_zero PadicInt.coe_zero
theorem coe_eq_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, Subtype.coe_inj]
#align padic_int.coe_eq_zero PadicInt.coe_eq_zero
theorem coe_ne_zero (z : ℤ_[p]) : (z : ℚ_[p]) ≠ 0 ↔ z ≠ 0 := z.coe_eq_zero.not
#align padic_int.coe_ne_zero PadicInt.coe_ne_zero
instance : AddCommGroup ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : AddCommGroup (subring p))
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ_[p] := (by infer_instance : CommRing (subring p))
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = n := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_nat_cast PadicInt.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_nat_cast := coe_natCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_intCast (z : ℤ) : ((z : ℤ_[p]) : ℚ_[p]) = z := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_int_cast PadicInt.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
/-- The coercion from `ℤ_[p]` to `ℚ_[p]` as a ring homomorphism. -/
def Coe.ringHom : ℤ_[p] →+* ℚ_[p] := (subring p).subtype
#align padic_int.coe.ring_hom PadicInt.Coe.ringHom
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_pow (x : ℤ_[p]) (n : ℕ) : (↑(x ^ n) : ℚ_[p]) = (↑x : ℚ_[p]) ^ n := rfl
#align padic_int.coe_pow PadicInt.coe_pow
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem mk_coe (k : ℤ_[p]) : (⟨k, k.2⟩ : ℤ_[p]) = k := Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align padic_int.mk_coe PadicInt.mk_coe
/-- The inverse of a `p`-adic integer with norm equal to `1` is also a `p`-adic integer.
Otherwise, the inverse is defined to be `0`. -/
def inv : ℤ_[p] → ℤ_[p]
| ⟨k, _⟩ => if h : ‖k‖ = 1 then ⟨k⁻¹, by simp [h]⟩ else 0
#align padic_int.inv PadicInt.inv
instance : CharZero ℤ_[p] where
cast_injective m n h := Nat.cast_injective (by rw [Subtype.ext_iff] at h; norm_cast at h)
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note: not in simpNF
theorem intCast_eq (z1 z2 : ℤ) : (z1 : ℤ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 := by
suffices (z1 : ℚ_[p]) = z2 ↔ z1 = z2 from Iff.trans (by norm_cast) this
norm_cast
#align padic_int.coe_int_eq PadicInt.intCast_eq
-- 2024-04-05
@[deprecated] alias coe_int_eq := intCast_eq
/-- A sequence of integers that is Cauchy with respect to the `p`-adic norm converges to a `p`-adic
integer. -/
def ofIntSeq (seq : ℕ → ℤ) (h : IsCauSeq (padicNorm p) fun n => seq n) : ℤ_[p] :=
⟨⟦⟨_, h⟩⟧,
show ↑(PadicSeq.norm _) ≤ (1 : ℝ) by
rw [PadicSeq.norm]
split_ifs with hne <;> norm_cast
apply padicNorm.of_int⟩
#align padic_int.of_int_seq PadicInt.ofIntSeq
end PadicInt
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Instances
We now show that `ℤ_[p]` is a
* complete metric space
* normed ring
* integral domain
-/
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
instance : MetricSpace ℤ_[p] := Subtype.metricSpace
instance completeSpace : CompleteSpace ℤ_[p] :=
have : IsClosed { x : ℚ_[p] | ‖x‖ ≤ 1 } := isClosed_le continuous_norm continuous_const
this.completeSpace_coe
#align padic_int.complete_space PadicInt.completeSpace
instance : Norm ℤ_[p] := ⟨fun z => ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖⟩
variable {p}
theorem norm_def {z : ℤ_[p]} : ‖z‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := rfl
#align padic_int.norm_def PadicInt.norm_def
variable (p)
instance : NormedCommRing ℤ_[p] :=
{ PadicInt.instCommRing with
dist_eq := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
norm_mul := by simp [norm_def]
norm := norm }
instance : NormOneClass ℤ_[p] :=
⟨norm_def.trans norm_one⟩
instance isAbsoluteValue : IsAbsoluteValue fun z : ℤ_[p] => ‖z‖ where
abv_nonneg' := norm_nonneg
abv_eq_zero' := by simp [norm_eq_zero]
abv_add' := fun ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ => norm_add_le _ _
abv_mul' _ _ := by simp only [norm_def, padicNormE.mul, PadicInt.coe_mul]
#align padic_int.is_absolute_value PadicInt.isAbsoluteValue
variable {p}
instance : IsDomain ℤ_[p] := Function.Injective.isDomain (subring p).subtype Subtype.coe_injective
end PadicInt
namespace PadicInt
/-! ### Norm -/
variable {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime]
theorem norm_le_one (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z‖ ≤ 1 := z.2
#align padic_int.norm_le_one PadicInt.norm_le_one
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]) : ‖z1 * z2‖ = ‖z1‖ * ‖z2‖ := by simp [norm_def]
#align padic_int.norm_mul PadicInt.norm_mul
@[simp]
theorem norm_pow (z : ℤ_[p]) : ∀ n : ℕ, ‖z ^ n‖ = ‖z‖ ^ n
| 0 => by simp
| k + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, norm_mul]
congr
apply norm_pow
#align padic_int.norm_pow PadicInt.norm_pow
theorem nonarchimedean (q r : ℤ_[p]) : ‖q + r‖ ≤ max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ := padicNormE.nonarchimedean _ _
#align padic_int.nonarchimedean PadicInt.nonarchimedean
theorem norm_add_eq_max_of_ne {q r : ℤ_[p]} : ‖q‖ ≠ ‖r‖ → ‖q + r‖ = max ‖q‖ ‖r‖ :=
padicNormE.add_eq_max_of_ne
#align padic_int.norm_add_eq_max_of_ne PadicInt.norm_add_eq_max_of_ne
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z2‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_right) h
#align padic_int.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right PadicInt.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_right
theorem norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left {z1 z2 : ℤ_[p]} (h : ‖z1 + z2‖ < ‖z1‖) : ‖z1‖ = ‖z2‖ :=
by_contra fun hne =>
not_lt_of_ge (by rw [norm_add_eq_max_of_ne hne]; apply le_max_left) h
#align padic_int.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left PadicInt.norm_eq_of_norm_add_lt_left
@[simp]
theorem padic_norm_e_of_padicInt (z : ℤ_[p]) : ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ = ‖z‖ := by simp [norm_def]
#align padic_int.padic_norm_e_of_padic_int PadicInt.padic_norm_e_of_padicInt
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Padics/PadicIntegers.lean | 306 | 306 | theorem norm_intCast_eq_padic_norm (z : ℤ) : ‖(z : ℤ_[p])‖ = ‖(z : ℚ_[p])‖ := by | simp [norm_def]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Stream.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.Basic
import Mathlib.Init.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
#align_import data.stream.init from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"207cfac9fcd06138865b5d04f7091e46d9320432"
/-!
# Streams a.k.a. infinite lists a.k.a. infinite sequences
Porting note:
This file used to be in the core library. It was moved to `mathlib` and renamed to `init` to avoid
name clashes. -/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Nat Function Option
namespace Stream'
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {δ : Type w}
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Stream' α) :=
⟨Stream'.const default⟩
protected theorem eta (s : Stream' α) : (head s::tail s) = s :=
funext fun i => by cases i <;> rfl
#align stream.eta Stream'.eta
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} : (∀ n, get s₁ n = get s₂ n) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun h => funext h
#align stream.ext Stream'.ext
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : get (a::s) 0 = a :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_zero_cons Stream'.get_zero_cons
@[simp]
theorem head_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : head (a::s) = a :=
rfl
#align stream.head_cons Stream'.head_cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : tail (a::s) = s :=
rfl
#align stream.tail_cons Stream'.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem get_drop (n m : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : get (drop m s) n = get s (n + m) :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_drop Stream'.get_drop
theorem tail_eq_drop (s : Stream' α) : tail s = drop 1 s :=
rfl
#align stream.tail_eq_drop Stream'.tail_eq_drop
@[simp]
theorem drop_drop (n m : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (drop m s) = drop (n + m) s := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_assoc]
#align stream.drop_drop Stream'.drop_drop
@[simp] theorem get_tail {s : Stream' α} : s.tail.get n = s.get (n + 1) := rfl
@[simp] theorem tail_drop' {s : Stream' α} : tail (drop i s) = s.drop (i+1) := by
ext; simp [Nat.add_comm, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem drop_tail' {s : Stream' α} : drop i (tail s) = s.drop (i+1) := rfl
theorem tail_drop (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : tail (drop n s) = drop n (tail s) := by simp
#align stream.tail_drop Stream'.tail_drop
theorem get_succ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : get s (succ n) = get (tail s) n :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_succ Stream'.get_succ
@[simp]
theorem get_succ_cons (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) (x : α) : get (x::s) n.succ = get s n :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_succ_cons Stream'.get_succ_cons
@[simp] theorem drop_zero {s : Stream' α} : s.drop 0 = s := rfl
theorem drop_succ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : drop (succ n) s = drop n (tail s) :=
rfl
#align stream.drop_succ Stream'.drop_succ
theorem head_drop (a : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : (a.drop n).head = a.get n := by simp
#align stream.head_drop Stream'.head_drop
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (cons : α → Stream' α → Stream' α) := fun x y s t h =>
⟨by rw [← get_zero_cons x s, h, get_zero_cons],
Stream'.ext fun n => by rw [← get_succ_cons n _ x, h, get_succ_cons]⟩
#align stream.cons_injective2 Stream'.cons_injective2
theorem cons_injective_left (s : Stream' α) : Function.Injective fun x => cons x s :=
cons_injective2.left _
#align stream.cons_injective_left Stream'.cons_injective_left
theorem cons_injective_right (x : α) : Function.Injective (cons x) :=
cons_injective2.right _
#align stream.cons_injective_right Stream'.cons_injective_right
theorem all_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : All p s = ∀ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
#align stream.all_def Stream'.all_def
theorem any_def (p : α → Prop) (s : Stream' α) : Any p s = ∃ n, p (get s n) :=
rfl
#align stream.any_def Stream'.any_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ a::s :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
#align stream.mem_cons Stream'.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a : α} {s : Stream' α} (b : α) : a ∈ s → a ∈ b::s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (succ n) (by rw [get_succ, tail_cons, h])
#align stream.mem_cons_of_mem Stream'.mem_cons_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons {a b : α} {s : Stream' α} : (a ∈ b::s) → a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => by
cases' n with n'
· left
exact h
· right
rw [get_succ, tail_cons] at h
exact ⟨n', h⟩
#align stream.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons Stream'.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons
theorem mem_of_get_eq {n : Nat} {s : Stream' α} {a : α} : a = get s n → a ∈ s := fun h =>
Exists.intro n h
#align stream.mem_of_nth_eq Stream'.mem_of_get_eq
section Map
variable (f : α → β)
theorem drop_map (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : drop n (map f s) = map f (drop n s) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
#align stream.drop_map Stream'.drop_map
@[simp]
theorem get_map (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : get (map f s) n = f (get s n) :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_map Stream'.get_map
theorem tail_map (s : Stream' α) : tail (map f s) = map f (tail s) := rfl
#align stream.tail_map Stream'.tail_map
@[simp]
theorem head_map (s : Stream' α) : head (map f s) = f (head s) :=
rfl
#align stream.head_map Stream'.head_map
theorem map_eq (s : Stream' α) : map f s = f (head s)::map f (tail s) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f s), tail_map, head_map]
#align stream.map_eq Stream'.map_eq
theorem map_cons (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : map f (a::s) = f a::map f s := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (map f (a::s)), map_eq]; rfl
#align stream.map_cons Stream'.map_cons
@[simp]
theorem map_id (s : Stream' α) : map id s = s :=
rfl
#align stream.map_id Stream'.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (g : β → δ) (f : α → β) (s : Stream' α) : map g (map f s) = map (g ∘ f) s :=
rfl
#align stream.map_map Stream'.map_map
@[simp]
theorem map_tail (s : Stream' α) : map f (tail s) = tail (map f s) :=
rfl
#align stream.map_tail Stream'.map_tail
theorem mem_map {a : α} {s : Stream' α} : a ∈ s → f a ∈ map f s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro n (by rw [get_map, h])
#align stream.mem_map Stream'.mem_map
theorem exists_of_mem_map {f} {b : β} {s : Stream' α} : b ∈ map f s → ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ f a = b :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => ⟨get s n, ⟨n, rfl⟩, h.symm⟩
#align stream.exists_of_mem_map Stream'.exists_of_mem_map
end Map
section Zip
variable (f : α → β → δ)
theorem drop_zip (n : Nat) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
drop n (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (drop n s₁) (drop n s₂) :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
#align stream.drop_zip Stream'.drop_zip
@[simp]
theorem get_zip (n : Nat) (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
get (zip f s₁ s₂) n = f (get s₁ n) (get s₂ n) :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_zip Stream'.get_zip
theorem head_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) : head (zip f s₁ s₂) = f (head s₁) (head s₂) :=
rfl
#align stream.head_zip Stream'.head_zip
theorem tail_zip (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
tail (zip f s₁ s₂) = zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) :=
rfl
#align stream.tail_zip Stream'.tail_zip
theorem zip_eq (s₁ : Stream' α) (s₂ : Stream' β) :
zip f s₁ s₂ = f (head s₁) (head s₂)::zip f (tail s₁) (tail s₂) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (zip f s₁ s₂)]; rfl
#align stream.zip_eq Stream'.zip_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_enum (s : Stream' α) (n : ℕ) : get (enum s) n = (n, s.get n) :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_enum Stream'.get_enum
theorem enum_eq_zip (s : Stream' α) : enum s = zip Prod.mk nats s :=
rfl
#align stream.enum_eq_zip Stream'.enum_eq_zip
end Zip
@[simp]
theorem mem_const (a : α) : a ∈ const a :=
Exists.intro 0 rfl
#align stream.mem_const Stream'.mem_const
theorem const_eq (a : α) : const a = a::const a := by
apply Stream'.ext; intro n
cases n <;> rfl
#align stream.const_eq Stream'.const_eq
@[simp]
theorem tail_const (a : α) : tail (const a) = const a :=
suffices tail (a::const a) = const a by rwa [← const_eq] at this
rfl
#align stream.tail_const Stream'.tail_const
@[simp]
theorem map_const (f : α → β) (a : α) : map f (const a) = const (f a) :=
rfl
#align stream.map_const Stream'.map_const
@[simp]
theorem get_const (n : Nat) (a : α) : get (const a) n = a :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_const Stream'.get_const
@[simp]
theorem drop_const (n : Nat) (a : α) : drop n (const a) = const a :=
Stream'.ext fun _ => rfl
#align stream.drop_const Stream'.drop_const
@[simp]
theorem head_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : head (iterate f a) = a :=
rfl
#align stream.head_iterate Stream'.head_iterate
theorem get_succ_iterate' (n : Nat) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = f (get (iterate f a) n) := rfl
theorem tail_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : tail (iterate f a) = iterate f (f a) := by
ext n
rw [get_tail]
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· rw [get_succ_iterate', ih, get_succ_iterate']
#align stream.tail_iterate Stream'.tail_iterate
theorem iterate_eq (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f a = a::iterate f (f a) := by
rw [← Stream'.eta (iterate f a)]
rw [tail_iterate]; rfl
#align stream.iterate_eq Stream'.iterate_eq
@[simp]
theorem get_zero_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : get (iterate f a) 0 = a :=
rfl
#align stream.nth_zero_iterate Stream'.get_zero_iterate
theorem get_succ_iterate (n : Nat) (f : α → α) (a : α) :
get (iterate f a) (succ n) = get (iterate f (f a)) n := by rw [get_succ, tail_iterate]
#align stream.nth_succ_iterate Stream'.get_succ_iterate
section Bisim
variable (R : Stream' α → Stream' α → Prop)
/-- equivalence relation -/
local infixl:50 " ~ " => R
/-- Streams `s₁` and `s₂` are defined to be bisimulations if
their heads are equal and tails are bisimulations. -/
def IsBisimulation :=
∀ ⦃s₁ s₂⦄, s₁ ~ s₂ →
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ tail s₁ ~ tail s₂
#align stream.is_bisimulation Stream'.IsBisimulation
theorem get_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) :
∀ {s₁ s₂} (n), s₁ ~ s₂ → get s₁ n = get s₂ n ∧ drop (n + 1) s₁ ~ drop (n + 1) s₂
| _, _, 0, h => bisim h
| _, _, n + 1, h =>
match bisim h with
| ⟨_, trel⟩ => get_of_bisim bisim n trel
#align stream.nth_of_bisim Stream'.get_of_bisim
-- If two streams are bisimilar, then they are equal
theorem eq_of_bisim (bisim : IsBisimulation R) : ∀ {s₁ s₂}, s₁ ~ s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun r =>
Stream'.ext fun n => And.left (get_of_bisim R bisim n r)
#align stream.eq_of_bisim Stream'.eq_of_bisim
end Bisim
theorem bisim_simple (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) :
head s₁ = head s₂ → s₁ = tail s₁ → s₂ = tail s₂ → s₁ = s₂ := fun hh ht₁ ht₂ =>
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁ s₂ => head s₁ = head s₂ ∧ s₁ = tail s₁ ∧ s₂ = tail s₂)
(fun s₁ s₂ ⟨h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ => by
constructor
· exact h₁
rw [← h₂, ← h₃]
(repeat' constructor) <;> assumption)
(And.intro hh (And.intro ht₁ ht₂))
#align stream.bisim_simple Stream'.bisim_simple
theorem coinduction {s₁ s₂ : Stream' α} :
head s₁ = head s₂ →
(∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂)) → s₁ = s₂ :=
fun hh ht =>
eq_of_bisim
(fun s₁ s₂ =>
head s₁ = head s₂ ∧
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β), fr s₁ = fr s₂ → fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂))
(fun s₁ s₂ h =>
have h₁ : head s₁ = head s₂ := And.left h
have h₂ : head (tail s₁) = head (tail s₂) := And.right h α (@head α) h₁
have h₃ :
∀ (β : Type u) (fr : Stream' α → β),
fr (tail s₁) = fr (tail s₂) → fr (tail (tail s₁)) = fr (tail (tail s₂)) :=
fun β fr => And.right h β fun s => fr (tail s)
And.intro h₁ (And.intro h₂ h₃))
(And.intro hh ht)
#align stream.coinduction Stream'.coinduction
@[simp]
theorem iterate_id (a : α) : iterate id a = const a :=
coinduction rfl fun β fr ch => by rw [tail_iterate, tail_const]; exact ch
#align stream.iterate_id Stream'.iterate_id
theorem map_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : iterate f (f a) = map f (iterate f a) := by
funext n
induction' n with n' ih
· rfl
· unfold map iterate get
rw [map, get] at ih
rw [iterate]
exact congrArg f ih
#align stream.map_iterate Stream'.map_iterate
section Corec
theorem corec_def (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = map f (iterate g a) :=
rfl
#align stream.corec_def Stream'.corec_def
theorem corec_eq (f : α → β) (g : α → α) (a : α) : corec f g a = f a::corec f g (g a) := by
rw [corec_def, map_eq, head_iterate, tail_iterate]; rfl
#align stream.corec_eq Stream'.corec_eq
theorem corec_id_id_eq_const (a : α) : corec id id a = const a := by
rw [corec_def, map_id, iterate_id]
#align stream.corec_id_id_eq_const Stream'.corec_id_id_eq_const
theorem corec_id_f_eq_iterate (f : α → α) (a : α) : corec id f a = iterate f a :=
rfl
#align stream.corec_id_f_eq_iterate Stream'.corec_id_f_eq_iterate
end Corec
section Corec'
theorem corec'_eq (f : α → β × α) (a : α) : corec' f a = (f a).1::corec' f (f a).2 :=
corec_eq _ _ _
#align stream.corec'_eq Stream'.corec'_eq
end Corec'
theorem unfolds_eq (g : α → β) (f : α → α) (a : α) : unfolds g f a = g a::unfolds g f (f a) := by
unfold unfolds; rw [corec_eq]
#align stream.unfolds_eq Stream'.unfolds_eq
theorem get_unfolds_head_tail : ∀ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α),
get (unfolds head tail s) n = get s n := by
intro n; induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [get_succ, get_succ, unfolds_eq, tail_cons, ih]
#align stream.nth_unfolds_head_tail Stream'.get_unfolds_head_tail
theorem unfolds_head_eq : ∀ s : Stream' α, unfolds head tail s = s := fun s =>
Stream'.ext fun n => get_unfolds_head_tail n s
#align stream.unfolds_head_eq Stream'.unfolds_head_eq
theorem interleave_eq (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::(tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂) := by
let t := tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂
show s₁ ⋈ s₂ = head s₁::head s₂::t
unfold interleave; unfold corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; dsimp; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
#align stream.interleave_eq Stream'.interleave_eq
theorem tail_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₂ ⋈ tail s₁ := by
unfold interleave corecOn; rw [corec_eq]; rfl
#align stream.tail_interleave Stream'.tail_interleave
theorem interleave_tail_tail (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : tail s₁ ⋈ tail s₂ = tail (tail (s₁ ⋈ s₂)) := by
rw [interleave_eq s₁ s₂]; rfl
#align stream.interleave_tail_tail Stream'.interleave_tail_tail
theorem get_interleave_left : ∀ (n : Nat) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n) = get s₁ n
| 0, s₁, s₂ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n))) = get s₁ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons]
rw [get_interleave_left n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
#align stream.nth_interleave_left Stream'.get_interleave_left
theorem get_interleave_right : ∀ (n : Nat) (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α),
get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (2 * n + 1) = get s₂ n
| 0, s₁, s₂ => rfl
| n + 1, s₁, s₂ => by
change get (s₁ ⋈ s₂) (succ (succ (2 * n + 1))) = get s₂ (succ n)
rw [get_succ, get_succ, interleave_eq, tail_cons, tail_cons,
get_interleave_right n (tail s₁) (tail s₂)]
rfl
#align stream.nth_interleave_right Stream'.get_interleave_right
theorem mem_interleave_left {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_interleave_left])
#align stream.mem_interleave_left Stream'.mem_interleave_left
theorem mem_interleave_right {a : α} {s₁ : Stream' α} (s₂ : Stream' α) : a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ⋈ s₂ :=
fun ⟨n, h⟩ => Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_interleave_right])
#align stream.mem_interleave_right Stream'.mem_interleave_right
theorem odd_eq (s : Stream' α) : odd s = even (tail s) :=
rfl
#align stream.odd_eq Stream'.odd_eq
@[simp]
theorem head_even (s : Stream' α) : head (even s) = head s :=
rfl
#align stream.head_even Stream'.head_even
theorem tail_even (s : Stream' α) : tail (even s) = even (tail (tail s)) := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]
rfl
#align stream.tail_even Stream'.tail_even
theorem even_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (s : Stream' α) : even (a₁::a₂::s) = a₁::even s := by
unfold even
rw [corec_eq]; rfl
#align stream.even_cons_cons Stream'.even_cons_cons
theorem even_tail (s : Stream' α) : even (tail s) = odd s :=
rfl
#align stream.even_tail Stream'.even_tail
theorem even_interleave (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : even (s₁ ⋈ s₂) = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s₁' s₁ => ∃ s₂, s₁' = even (s₁ ⋈ s₂))
(fun s₁' s₁ ⟨s₂, h₁⟩ => by
rw [h₁]
constructor
· rfl
· exact ⟨tail s₂, by rw [interleave_eq, even_cons_cons, tail_cons]⟩)
(Exists.intro s₂ rfl)
#align stream.even_interleave Stream'.even_interleave
theorem interleave_even_odd (s₁ : Stream' α) : even s₁ ⋈ odd s₁ = s₁ :=
eq_of_bisim (fun s' s => s' = even s ⋈ odd s)
(fun s' s (h : s' = even s ⋈ odd s) => by
rw [h]; constructor
· rfl
· simp [odd_eq, odd_eq, tail_interleave, tail_even])
rfl
#align stream.interleave_even_odd Stream'.interleave_even_odd
theorem get_even : ∀ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α), get (even s) n = get s (2 * n)
| 0, s => rfl
| succ n, s => by
change get (even s) (succ n) = get s (succ (succ (2 * n)))
rw [get_succ, get_succ, tail_even, get_even n]; rfl
#align stream.nth_even Stream'.get_even
theorem get_odd : ∀ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α), get (odd s) n = get s (2 * n + 1) := fun n s => by
rw [odd_eq, get_even]; rfl
#align stream.nth_odd Stream'.get_odd
theorem mem_of_mem_even (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ even s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n) (by rw [h, get_even])
#align stream.mem_of_mem_even Stream'.mem_of_mem_even
theorem mem_of_mem_odd (a : α) (s : Stream' α) : a ∈ odd s → a ∈ s := fun ⟨n, h⟩ =>
Exists.intro (2 * n + 1) (by rw [h, get_odd])
#align stream.mem_of_mem_odd Stream'.mem_of_mem_odd
theorem nil_append_stream (s : Stream' α) : appendStream' [] s = s :=
rfl
#align stream.nil_append_stream Stream'.nil_append_stream
theorem cons_append_stream (a : α) (l : List α) (s : Stream' α) :
appendStream' (a::l) s = a::appendStream' l s :=
rfl
#align stream.cons_append_stream Stream'.cons_append_stream
theorem append_append_stream : ∀ (l₁ l₂ : List α) (s : Stream' α),
l₁ ++ l₂ ++ₛ s = l₁ ++ₛ (l₂ ++ₛ s)
| [], l₂, s => rfl
| List.cons a l₁, l₂, s => by
rw [List.cons_append, cons_append_stream, cons_append_stream, append_append_stream l₁]
#align stream.append_append_stream Stream'.append_append_stream
theorem map_append_stream (f : α → β) :
∀ (l : List α) (s : Stream' α), map f (l ++ₛ s) = List.map f l ++ₛ map f s
| [], s => rfl
| List.cons a l, s => by
rw [cons_append_stream, List.map_cons, map_cons, cons_append_stream, map_append_stream f l]
#align stream.map_append_stream Stream'.map_append_stream
theorem drop_append_stream : ∀ (l : List α) (s : Stream' α), drop l.length (l ++ₛ s) = s
| [], s => by rfl
| List.cons a l, s => by
rw [List.length_cons, drop_succ, cons_append_stream, tail_cons, drop_append_stream l s]
#align stream.drop_append_stream Stream'.drop_append_stream
theorem append_stream_head_tail (s : Stream' α) : [head s] ++ₛ tail s = s := by
rw [cons_append_stream, nil_append_stream, Stream'.eta]
#align stream.append_stream_head_tail Stream'.append_stream_head_tail
theorem mem_append_stream_right : ∀ {a : α} (l : List α) {s : Stream' α}, a ∈ s → a ∈ l ++ₛ s
| _, [], _, h => h
| a, List.cons _ l, s, h =>
have ih : a ∈ l ++ₛ s := mem_append_stream_right l h
mem_cons_of_mem _ ih
#align stream.mem_append_stream_right Stream'.mem_append_stream_right
theorem mem_append_stream_left : ∀ {a : α} {l : List α} (s : Stream' α), a ∈ l → a ∈ l ++ₛ s
| _, [], _, h => absurd h (List.not_mem_nil _)
| a, List.cons b l, s, h =>
Or.elim (List.eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons h) (fun aeqb : a = b => Exists.intro 0 aeqb)
fun ainl : a ∈ l => mem_cons_of_mem b (mem_append_stream_left s ainl)
#align stream.mem_append_stream_left Stream'.mem_append_stream_left
@[simp]
theorem take_zero (s : Stream' α) : take 0 s = [] :=
rfl
#align stream.take_zero Stream'.take_zero
-- This lemma used to be simp, but we removed it from the simp set because:
-- 1) It duplicates the (often large) `s` term, resulting in large tactic states.
-- 2) It conflicts with the very useful `dropLast_take` lemma below (causing nonconfluence).
theorem take_succ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : take (succ n) s = head s::take n (tail s) :=
rfl
#align stream.take_succ Stream'.take_succ
@[simp] theorem take_succ_cons (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) : take (n+1) (a::s) = a :: take n s := rfl
theorem take_succ' {s : Stream' α} : ∀ n, s.take (n+1) = s.take n ++ [s.get n]
| 0 => rfl
| n+1 => by rw [take_succ, take_succ' n, ← List.cons_append, ← take_succ, get_tail]
@[simp]
theorem length_take (n : ℕ) (s : Stream' α) : (take n s).length = n := by
induction n generalizing s <;> simp [*, take_succ]
#align stream.length_take Stream'.length_take
@[simp]
theorem take_take {s : Stream' α} : ∀ {m n}, (s.take n).take m = s.take (min n m)
| 0, n => by rw [Nat.min_zero, List.take_zero, take_zero]
| m, 0 => by rw [Nat.zero_min, take_zero, List.take_nil]
| m+1, n+1 => by rw [take_succ, List.take_cons, Nat.succ_min_succ, take_succ, take_take]
@[simp] theorem concat_take_get {s : Stream' α} : s.take n ++ [s.get n] = s.take (n+1) :=
(take_succ' n).symm
theorem get?_take {s : Stream' α} : ∀ {k n}, k < n → (s.take n).get? k = s.get k
| 0, n+1, _ => rfl
| k+1, n+1, h => by rw [take_succ, List.get?, get?_take (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ h), get_succ]
theorem get?_take_succ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α) :
List.get? (take (succ n) s) n = some (get s n) :=
get?_take (Nat.lt_succ_self n)
#align stream.nth_take_succ Stream'.get?_take_succ
@[simp] theorem dropLast_take {xs : Stream' α} :
(Stream'.take n xs).dropLast = Stream'.take (n-1) xs := by
cases n with
| zero => simp
| succ n => rw [take_succ', List.dropLast_concat, Nat.add_one_sub_one]
@[simp]
theorem append_take_drop : ∀ (n : Nat) (s : Stream' α),
appendStream' (take n s) (drop n s) = s := by
intro n
induction' n with n' ih
· intro s
rfl
· intro s
rw [take_succ, drop_succ, cons_append_stream, ih (tail s), Stream'.eta]
#align stream.append_take_drop Stream'.append_take_drop
-- Take theorem reduces a proof of equality of infinite streams to an
-- induction over all their finite approximations.
| Mathlib/Data/Stream/Init.lean | 627 | 636 | theorem take_theorem (s₁ s₂ : Stream' α) : (∀ n : Nat, take n s₁ = take n s₂) → s₁ = s₂ := by |
intro h; apply Stream'.ext; intro n
induction' n with n _
· have aux := h 1
simp? [take] at aux says
simp only [take, List.cons.injEq, and_true] at aux
exact aux
· have h₁ : some (get s₁ (succ n)) = some (get s₂ (succ n)) := by
rw [← get?_take_succ, ← get?_take_succ, h (succ (succ n))]
injection h₁
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
#align_import algebra.add_torsor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9003f28797c0664a49e4179487267c494477d853"
/-!
# Torsors of additive group actions
This file defines torsors of additive group actions.
## Notations
The group elements are referred to as acting on points. This file
defines the notation `+ᵥ` for adding a group element to a point and
`-ᵥ` for subtracting two points to produce a group element.
## Implementation notes
Affine spaces are the motivating example of torsors of additive group actions. It may be appropriate
to refactor in terms of the general definition of group actions, via `to_additive`, when there is a
use for multiplicative torsors (currently mathlib only develops the theory of group actions for
multiplicative group actions).
## Notations
* `v +ᵥ p` is a notation for `VAdd.vadd`, the left action of an additive monoid;
* `p₁ -ᵥ p₂` is a notation for `VSub.vsub`, difference between two points in an additive torsor
as an element of the corresponding additive group;
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principal_homogeneous_space
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
/-- An `AddTorsor G P` gives a structure to the nonempty type `P`,
acted on by an `AddGroup G` with a transitive and free action given
by the `+ᵥ` operation and a corresponding subtraction given by the
`-ᵥ` operation. In the case of a vector space, it is an affine
space. -/
class AddTorsor (G : outParam Type*) (P : Type*) [AddGroup G] extends AddAction G P,
VSub G P where
[nonempty : Nonempty P]
/-- Torsor subtraction and addition with the same element cancels out. -/
vsub_vadd' : ∀ p₁ p₂ : P, (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : G) +ᵥ p₂ = p₁
/-- Torsor addition and subtraction with the same element cancels out. -/
vadd_vsub' : ∀ (g : G) (p : P), g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g
#align add_torsor AddTorsor
-- Porting note(#12096): removed `nolint instance_priority`; lint not ported yet
attribute [instance 100] AddTorsor.nonempty
-- Porting note(#12094): removed nolint; dangerous_instance linter not ported yet
--attribute [nolint dangerous_instance] AddTorsor.toVSub
/-- An `AddGroup G` is a torsor for itself. -/
-- Porting note(#12096): linter not ported yet
--@[nolint instance_priority]
instance addGroupIsAddTorsor (G : Type*) [AddGroup G] : AddTorsor G G where
vsub := Sub.sub
vsub_vadd' := sub_add_cancel
vadd_vsub' := add_sub_cancel_right
#align add_group_is_add_torsor addGroupIsAddTorsor
/-- Simplify subtraction for a torsor for an `AddGroup G` over
itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_sub {G : Type*} [AddGroup G] (g₁ g₂ : G) : g₁ -ᵥ g₂ = g₁ - g₂ :=
rfl
#align vsub_eq_sub vsub_eq_sub
section General
variable {G : Type*} {P : Type*} [AddGroup G] [T : AddTorsor G P]
/-- Adding the result of subtracting from another point produces that
point. -/
@[simp]
theorem vsub_vadd (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ p₂ +ᵥ p₂ = p₁ :=
AddTorsor.vsub_vadd' p₁ p₂
#align vsub_vadd vsub_vadd
/-- Adding a group element then subtracting the original point
produces that group element. -/
@[simp]
theorem vadd_vsub (g : G) (p : P) : g +ᵥ p -ᵥ p = g :=
AddTorsor.vadd_vsub' g p
#align vadd_vsub vadd_vsub
/-- If the same point added to two group elements produces equal
results, those group elements are equal. -/
theorem vadd_right_cancel {g₁ g₂ : G} (p : P) (h : g₁ +ᵥ p = g₂ +ᵥ p) : g₁ = g₂ := by
-- Porting note: vadd_vsub g₁ → vadd_vsub g₁ p
rw [← vadd_vsub g₁ p, h, vadd_vsub]
#align vadd_right_cancel vadd_right_cancel
@[simp]
theorem vadd_right_cancel_iff {g₁ g₂ : G} (p : P) : g₁ +ᵥ p = g₂ +ᵥ p ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
⟨vadd_right_cancel p, fun h => h ▸ rfl⟩
#align vadd_right_cancel_iff vadd_right_cancel_iff
/-- Adding a group element to the point `p` is an injective
function. -/
theorem vadd_right_injective (p : P) : Function.Injective ((· +ᵥ p) : G → P) := fun _ _ =>
vadd_right_cancel p
#align vadd_right_injective vadd_right_injective
/-- Adding a group element to a point, then subtracting another point,
produces the same result as subtracting the points then adding the
group element. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddTorsor.lean | 117 | 119 | theorem vadd_vsub_assoc (g : G) (p₁ p₂ : P) : g +ᵥ p₁ -ᵥ p₂ = g + (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by |
apply vadd_right_cancel p₂
rw [vsub_vadd, add_vadd, vsub_vadd]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov,
Neil Strickland, Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Divisibility.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
#align_import algebra.divisibility.units from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e574b1a4e891376b0ef974b926da39e05da12a06"
/-!
# Divisibility and units
## Main definition
* `IsRelPrime x y`: that `x` and `y` are relatively prime, defined to mean that the only common
divisors of `x` and `y` are the units.
-/
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Units
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- Elements of the unit group of a monoid represented as elements of the monoid
divide any element of the monoid. -/
theorem coe_dvd : ↑u ∣ a :=
⟨↑u⁻¹ * a, by simp⟩
#align units.coe_dvd Units.coe_dvd
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_right : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, Eq⟩ ↦ ⟨c * ↑u⁻¹, by rw [← mul_assoc, ← Eq, Units.mul_inv_cancel_right]⟩)
fun ⟨c, Eq⟩ ↦ Eq.symm ▸ (_root_.dvd_mul_right _ _).mul_right _
#align units.dvd_mul_right Units.dvd_mul_right
/-- In a monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_right_dvd : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b :=
Iff.intro (fun ⟨c, Eq⟩ => ⟨↑u * c, Eq.trans (mul_assoc _ _ _)⟩) fun h =>
dvd_trans (Dvd.intro (↑u⁻¹) (by rw [mul_assoc, u.mul_inv, mul_one])) h
#align units.mul_right_dvd Units.mul_right_dvd
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b : α} {u : αˣ}
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all left
associates of `b`. -/
theorem dvd_mul_left : a ∣ u * b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply dvd_mul_right
#align units.dvd_mul_left Units.dvd_mul_left
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all
left associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
theorem mul_left_dvd : ↑u * a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply mul_right_dvd
#align units.mul_left_dvd Units.mul_left_dvd
end CommMonoid
end Units
namespace IsUnit
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] {a b u : α} (hu : IsUnit u)
/-- Units of a monoid divide any element of the monoid. -/
@[simp]
theorem dvd : u ∣ a := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.coe_dvd
#align is_unit.dvd IsUnit.dvd
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_right : a ∣ b * u ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.dvd_mul_right
#align is_unit.dvd_mul_right IsUnit.dvd_mul_right
/-- In a monoid, an element a divides an element b iff all associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_dvd : a * u ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.mul_right_dvd
#align is_unit.mul_right_dvd IsUnit.mul_right_dvd
theorem isPrimal : IsPrimal u := fun _ _ _ ↦ ⟨u, 1, hu.dvd, one_dvd _, (mul_one u).symm⟩
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α] {a b u : α} (hu : IsUnit u)
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff `a` divides all left
associates of `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem dvd_mul_left : a ∣ u * b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.dvd_mul_left
#align is_unit.dvd_mul_left IsUnit.dvd_mul_left
/-- In a commutative monoid, an element `a` divides an element `b` iff all
left associates of `a` divide `b`. -/
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_dvd : u * a ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rcases hu with ⟨u, rfl⟩
apply Units.mul_left_dvd
#align is_unit.mul_left_dvd IsUnit.mul_left_dvd
end CommMonoid
end IsUnit
section CommMonoid
variable [CommMonoid α]
theorem isUnit_iff_dvd_one {x : α} : IsUnit x ↔ x ∣ 1 :=
⟨IsUnit.dvd, fun ⟨y, h⟩ => ⟨⟨x, y, h.symm, by rw [h, mul_comm]⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align is_unit_iff_dvd_one isUnit_iff_dvd_one
theorem isUnit_iff_forall_dvd {x : α} : IsUnit x ↔ ∀ y, x ∣ y :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.trans ⟨fun h _ => h.trans (one_dvd _), fun h => h _⟩
#align is_unit_iff_forall_dvd isUnit_iff_forall_dvd
theorem isUnit_of_dvd_unit {x y : α} (xy : x ∣ y) (hu : IsUnit y) : IsUnit x :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <| xy.trans <| isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 hu
#align is_unit_of_dvd_unit isUnit_of_dvd_unit
theorem isUnit_of_dvd_one {a : α} (h : a ∣ 1) : IsUnit (a : α) :=
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.mpr h
#align is_unit_of_dvd_one isUnit_of_dvd_one
theorem not_isUnit_of_not_isUnit_dvd {a b : α} (ha : ¬IsUnit a) (hb : a ∣ b) : ¬IsUnit b :=
mt (isUnit_of_dvd_unit hb) ha
#align not_is_unit_of_not_is_unit_dvd not_isUnit_of_not_isUnit_dvd
end CommMonoid
section RelPrime
/-- `x` and `y` are relatively prime if every common divisor is a unit. -/
def IsRelPrime [Monoid α] (x y : α) : Prop := ∀ ⦃d⦄, d ∣ x → d ∣ y → IsUnit d
variable [CommMonoid α] {x y z : α}
@[symm] theorem IsRelPrime.symm (H : IsRelPrime x y) : IsRelPrime y x := fun _ hx hy ↦ H hy hx
theorem isRelPrime_comm : IsRelPrime x y ↔ IsRelPrime y x :=
⟨IsRelPrime.symm, IsRelPrime.symm⟩
theorem isRelPrime_self : IsRelPrime x x ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨(· dvd_rfl dvd_rfl), fun hu _ _ dvd ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit dvd hu⟩
theorem IsUnit.isRelPrime_left (h : IsUnit x) : IsRelPrime x y :=
fun _ hx _ ↦ isUnit_of_dvd_unit hx h
theorem IsUnit.isRelPrime_right (h : IsUnit y) : IsRelPrime x y := h.isRelPrime_left.symm
theorem isRelPrime_one_left : IsRelPrime 1 x := isUnit_one.isRelPrime_left
theorem isRelPrime_one_right : IsRelPrime x 1 := isUnit_one.isRelPrime_right
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_left_left (H : IsRelPrime (x * y) z) : IsRelPrime x z :=
fun _ hx ↦ H (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left hx _)
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_left_right (H : IsRelPrime (x * y) z) : IsRelPrime y z :=
(mul_comm x y ▸ H).of_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_right_left (H : IsRelPrime x (y * z)) : IsRelPrime x y := by
rw [isRelPrime_comm] at H ⊢
exact H.of_mul_left_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_mul_right_right (H : IsRelPrime x (y * z)) : IsRelPrime x z :=
(mul_comm y z ▸ H).of_mul_right_left
theorem IsRelPrime.of_dvd_left (h : IsRelPrime y z) (dvd : x ∣ y) : IsRelPrime x z := by
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := dvd; exact IsRelPrime.of_mul_left_left h
theorem IsRelPrime.of_dvd_right (h : IsRelPrime z y) (dvd : x ∣ y) : IsRelPrime z x :=
(h.symm.of_dvd_left dvd).symm
theorem IsRelPrime.isUnit_of_dvd (H : IsRelPrime x y) (d : x ∣ y) : IsUnit x := H dvd_rfl d
section IsUnit
variable (hu : IsUnit x)
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_left : IsRelPrime (x * y) z ↔ IsRelPrime y z :=
⟨IsRelPrime.of_mul_left_right, fun H _ h ↦ H (hu.dvd_mul_left.mp h)⟩
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_right : IsRelPrime y (x * z) ↔ IsRelPrime y z := by
rw [isRelPrime_comm, isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_left hu, isRelPrime_comm]
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_left : IsRelPrime (x * y) (x * z) ↔ IsRelPrime y z := by
rw [isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_left hu, isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_right hu]
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_right_left : IsRelPrime (y * x) z ↔ IsRelPrime y z := by
rw [mul_comm, isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_left hu]
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_right_right : IsRelPrime y (z * x) ↔ IsRelPrime y z := by
rw [mul_comm, isRelPrime_mul_unit_left_right hu]
theorem isRelPrime_mul_unit_right : IsRelPrime (y * x) (z * x) ↔ IsRelPrime y z := by
rw [isRelPrime_mul_unit_right_left hu, isRelPrime_mul_unit_right_right hu]
end IsUnit
| Mathlib/Algebra/Divisibility/Units.lean | 219 | 222 | theorem IsRelPrime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_isPrimal (H1 : IsRelPrime x z) (H2 : x ∣ y * z)
(h : IsPrimal x) : x ∣ y := by |
obtain ⟨a, b, ha, hb, rfl⟩ := h H2
exact (H1.of_mul_left_right.isUnit_of_dvd hb).mul_right_dvd.mpr ha
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Sébastien Gouëzel, Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Module
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Uniform
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Completion
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.BoundedLinearMaps
#align_import analysis.inner_product_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3f655f5297b030a87d641ad4e825af8d9679eb0b"
/-!
# Inner product space
This file defines inner product spaces and proves the basic properties. We do not formally
define Hilbert spaces, but they can be obtained using the set of assumptions
`[NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] [CompleteSpace E]`.
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. It generalizes the notion of
dot product in `ℝ^n` and provides the means of defining the length of a vector and the angle between
two vectors. In particular vectors `x` and `y` are orthogonal if their inner product equals zero.
We define both the real and complex cases at the same time using the `RCLike` typeclass.
This file proves general results on inner product spaces. For the specific construction of an inner
product structure on `n → 𝕜` for `𝕜 = ℝ` or `ℂ`, see `EuclideanSpace` in
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2`.
## Main results
- We define the class `InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E` extending `NormedSpace 𝕜 E` with a number of basic
properties, most notably the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality. Here `𝕜` is understood to be either `ℝ`
or `ℂ`, through the `RCLike` typeclass.
- We show that the inner product is continuous, `continuous_inner`, and bundle it as the
continuous sesquilinear map `innerSL` (see also `innerₛₗ` for the non-continuous version).
- We define `Orthonormal`, a predicate on a function `v : ι → E`, and prove the existence of a
maximal orthonormal set, `exists_maximal_orthonormal`. Bessel's inequality,
`Orthonormal.tsum_inner_products_le`, states that given an orthonormal set `v` and a vector `x`,
the sum of the norm-squares of the inner products `⟪v i, x⟫` is no more than the norm-square of
`x`. For the existence of orthonormal bases, Hilbert bases, etc., see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.projection`.
## Notation
We globally denote the real and complex inner products by `⟪·, ·⟫_ℝ` and `⟪·, ·⟫_ℂ` respectively.
We also provide two notation namespaces: `RealInnerProductSpace`, `ComplexInnerProductSpace`,
which respectively introduce the plain notation `⟪·, ·⟫` for the real and complex inner product.
## Implementation notes
We choose the convention that inner products are conjugate linear in the first argument and linear
in the second.
## Tags
inner product space, Hilbert space, norm
## References
* [Clément & Martin, *The Lax-Milgram Theorem. A detailed proof to be formalized in Coq*]
* [Clément & Martin, *A Coq formal proof of the Lax–Milgram theorem*]
The Coq code is available at the following address: <http://www.lri.fr/~sboldo/elfic/index.html>
-/
noncomputable section
open RCLike Real Filter
open Topology ComplexConjugate
open LinearMap (BilinForm)
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
/-- Syntactic typeclass for types endowed with an inner product -/
class Inner (𝕜 E : Type*) where
/-- The inner product function. -/
inner : E → E → 𝕜
#align has_inner Inner
export Inner (inner)
/-- The inner product with values in `𝕜`. -/
notation3:max "⟪" x ", " y "⟫_" 𝕜:max => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
section Notations
/-- The inner product with values in `ℝ`. -/
scoped[RealInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℝ _ _ x y
/-- The inner product with values in `ℂ`. -/
scoped[ComplexInnerProductSpace] notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner ℂ _ _ x y
end Notations
/-- An inner product space is a vector space with an additional operation called inner product.
The norm could be derived from the inner product, instead we require the existence of a norm and
the fact that `‖x‖^2 = re ⟪x, x⟫` to be able to put instances on `𝕂` or product
spaces.
To construct a norm from an inner product, see `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`.
-/
class InnerProductSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E] extends
NormedSpace 𝕜 E, Inner 𝕜 E where
/-- The inner product induces the norm. -/
norm_sq_eq_inner : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ 2 = re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space InnerProductSpace
/-!
### Constructing a normed space structure from an inner product
In the definition of an inner product space, we require the existence of a norm, which is equal
(but maybe not defeq) to the square root of the scalar product. This makes it possible to put
an inner product space structure on spaces with a preexisting norm (for instance `ℝ`), with good
properties. However, sometimes, one would like to define the norm starting only from a well-behaved
scalar product. This is what we implement in this paragraph, starting from a structure
`InnerProductSpace.Core` stating that we have a nice scalar product.
Our goal here is not to develop a whole theory with all the supporting API, as this will be done
below for `InnerProductSpace`. Instead, we implement the bare minimum to go as directly as
possible to the construction of the norm and the proof of the triangular inequality.
Warning: Do not use this `Core` structure if the space you are interested in already has a norm
instance defined on it, otherwise this will create a second non-defeq norm instance!
-/
/-- A structure requiring that a scalar product is positive definite and symmetric, from which one
can construct an `InnerProductSpace` instance in `InnerProductSpace.ofCore`. -/
-- @[nolint HasNonemptyInstance] porting note: I don't think we have this linter anymore
structure InnerProductSpace.Core (𝕜 : Type*) (F : Type*) [RCLike 𝕜] [AddCommGroup F]
[Module 𝕜 F] extends Inner 𝕜 F where
/-- The inner product is *hermitian*, taking the `conj` swaps the arguments. -/
conj_symm : ∀ x y, conj (inner y x) = inner x y
/-- The inner product is positive (semi)definite. -/
nonneg_re : ∀ x, 0 ≤ re (inner x x)
/-- The inner product is positive definite. -/
definite : ∀ x, inner x x = 0 → x = 0
/-- The inner product is additive in the first coordinate. -/
add_left : ∀ x y z, inner (x + y) z = inner x z + inner y z
/-- The inner product is conjugate linear in the first coordinate. -/
smul_left : ∀ x y r, inner (r • x) y = conj r * inner x y
#align inner_product_space.core InnerProductSpace.Core
/- We set `InnerProductSpace.Core` to be a class as we will use it as such in the construction
of the normed space structure that it produces. However, all the instances we will use will be
local to this proof. -/
attribute [class] InnerProductSpace.Core
/-- Define `InnerProductSpace.Core` from `InnerProductSpace`. Defined to reuse lemmas about
`InnerProductSpace.Core` for `InnerProductSpace`s. Note that the `Norm` instance provided by
`InnerProductSpace.Core.norm` is propositionally but not definitionally equal to the original
norm. -/
def InnerProductSpace.toCore [NormedAddCommGroup E] [c : InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E] :
InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E :=
{ c with
nonneg_re := fun x => by
rw [← InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner]
apply sq_nonneg
definite := fun x hx =>
norm_eq_zero.1 <| pow_eq_zero (n := 2) <| by
rw [InnerProductSpace.norm_sq_eq_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, hx, map_zero] }
#align inner_product_space.to_core InnerProductSpace.toCore
namespace InnerProductSpace.Core
variable [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] [c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 F _ x y
local notation "normSqK" => @RCLike.normSq 𝕜 _
local notation "reK" => @RCLike.re 𝕜 _
local notation "ext_iff" => @RCLike.ext_iff 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
/-- Inner product defined by the `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. We can't reuse
`InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner` because it takes `InnerProductSpace.Core` as an explicit
argument. -/
def toInner' : Inner 𝕜 F :=
c.toInner
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_inner' InnerProductSpace.Core.toInner'
attribute [local instance] toInner'
/-- The norm squared function for `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure. -/
def normSq (x : F) :=
reK ⟪x, x⟫
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq
local notation "normSqF" => @normSq 𝕜 F _ _ _ _
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.conj_symm x y
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_conj_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_conj_symm
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
c.nonneg_re _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_nonneg InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
theorem inner_self_im (x : F) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]
simp [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_im InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
c.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]; simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_right
theorem ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self (x : F) : (normSqF x : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [ext_iff]
exact ⟨by simp only [ofReal_re]; rfl, by simp only [inner_self_im, ofReal_im]⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.coe_norm_sq_eq_inner_self InnerProductSpace.Core.ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : F) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_re_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : F) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_im_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
c.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : F) {r : 𝕜} : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left];
simp only [conj_conj, inner_conj_symm, RingHom.map_mul]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_smul_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_smul_right
theorem inner_zero_left (x : F) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : F), inner_smul_left];
simp only [zero_mul, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_left
theorem inner_zero_right (x : F) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_zero_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_zero_right
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨c.definite _, by
rintro rfl
exact inner_zero_left _⟩
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_zero
theorem normSq_eq_zero {x : F} : normSqF x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans
(by simp only [normSq, ext_iff, map_zero, inner_self_im, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff])
(@inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜 _ _ _ _ _ x)
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_sq_eq_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.normSq_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_ne_zero InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ne_zero
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : F) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
norm_num [ext_iff, inner_self_im]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_re_to_K InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_symm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_symm
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : F) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_left
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : F) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_neg_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_neg_right
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : F) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left, inner_neg_left]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_left InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_left
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : F) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right, inner_neg_right]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_right InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_right
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : F) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm
/-- Expand `inner (x + y) (x + y)` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_add_add_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_add_add_self
-- Expand `inner (x - y) (x - y)`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_sub_sub_self InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_sub_sub_self
/-- An auxiliary equality useful to prove the **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**: the square of the norm
of `⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y` is equal to `‖x‖ ^ 2 * (‖x‖ ^ 2 * ‖y‖ ^ 2 - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2)`. We use
`InnerProductSpace.ofCore.normSq x` etc (defeq to `is_R_or_C.re ⟪x, x⟫`) instead of `‖x‖ ^ 2`
etc to avoid extra rewrites when applying it to an `InnerProductSpace`. -/
theorem cauchy_schwarz_aux (x y : F) :
normSqF (⟪x, y⟫ • x - ⟪x, x⟫ • y) = normSqF x * (normSqF x * normSqF y - ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self]
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, conj_ofReal, mul_sub, ←
ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self x, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self y]
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, RCLike.conj_mul, mul_left_comm, ← inner_conj_symm y, mul_conj]
push_cast
ring
#align inner_product_space.core.cauchy_schwarz_aux InnerProductSpace.Core.cauchy_schwarz_aux
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**.
We need this for the `Core` structure to prove the triangle inequality below when
showing the core is a normed group.
-/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simpa only [inner_zero_left, map_zero, zero_mul, norm_zero] using le_rfl
· have hx' : 0 < normSqF x := inner_self_nonneg.lt_of_ne' (mt normSq_eq_zero.1 hx)
rw [← sub_nonneg, ← mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hx', ← normSq, ← normSq,
norm_inner_symm y, ← sq, ← cauchy_schwarz_aux]
exact inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_mul_inner_self_le InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- Norm constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure, defined to be the square root
of the scalar product. -/
def toNorm : Norm F where norm x := √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
#align inner_product_space.core.to_has_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.toNorm
attribute [local instance] toNorm
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_eq_sqrt_inner
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫), sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
#align inner_product_space.core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm (x : F) : √(normSqF x) = ‖x‖ := rfl
#align inner_product_space.core.sqrt_norm_sq_eq_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (mul_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) <|
calc
‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [norm_inner_symm]
_ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ := inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by simp only [inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]; ring
#align inner_product_space.core.norm_inner_le_norm InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm
/-- Normed group structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup F :=
AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
{ toFun := fun x => √(re ⟪x, x⟫)
map_zero' := by simp only [sqrt_zero, inner_zero_right, map_zero]
neg' := fun x => by simp only [inner_neg_left, neg_neg, inner_neg_right]
add_le' := fun x y => by
have h₁ : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := norm_inner_le_norm _ _
have h₂ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ := re_le_norm _
have h₃ : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := h₂.trans h₁
have h₄ : re ⟪y, x⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by rwa [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
have : ‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ ≤ (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) * (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, inner_add_add_self, mul_add, mul_comm, map_add]
linarith
exact nonneg_le_nonneg_of_sq_le_sq (add_nonneg (sqrt_nonneg _) (sqrt_nonneg _)) this
eq_zero_of_map_eq_zero' := fun x hx =>
normSq_eq_zero.1 <| (sqrt_eq_zero inner_self_nonneg).1 hx }
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_add_comm_group InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
attribute [local instance] toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Normed space structure constructed from an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure -/
def toNormedSpace : NormedSpace 𝕜 F where
norm_smul_le r x := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner, inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, ← mul_assoc]
rw [RCLike.conj_mul, ← ofReal_pow, re_ofReal_mul, sqrt_mul, ← ofReal_normSq_eq_inner_self,
ofReal_re]
· simp [sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, RCLike.sqrt_normSq_eq_norm]
· positivity
#align inner_product_space.core.to_normed_space InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace
end InnerProductSpace.Core
section
attribute [local instance] InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedAddCommGroup
/-- Given an `InnerProductSpace.Core` structure on a space, one can use it to turn
the space into an inner product space. The `NormedAddCommGroup` structure is expected
to already be defined with `InnerProductSpace.ofCore.toNormedAddCommGroup`. -/
def InnerProductSpace.ofCore [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜 F] (c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 F) :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F :=
letI : NormedSpace 𝕜 F := @InnerProductSpace.Core.toNormedSpace 𝕜 F _ _ _ c
{ c with
norm_sq_eq_inner := fun x => by
have h₁ : ‖x‖ ^ 2 = √(re (c.inner x x)) ^ 2 := rfl
have h₂ : 0 ≤ re (c.inner x x) := InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_self_nonneg
simp [h₁, sq_sqrt, h₂] }
#align inner_product_space.of_core InnerProductSpace.ofCore
end
/-! ### Properties of inner product spaces -/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
local notation "IK" => @RCLike.I 𝕜 _
local postfix:90 "†" => starRingEnd _
export InnerProductSpace (norm_sq_eq_inner)
section BasicProperties
@[simp]
theorem inner_conj_symm (x y : E) : ⟪y, x⟫† = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.conj_symm _ _
#align inner_conj_symm inner_conj_symm
theorem real_inner_comm (x y : F) : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_conj_symm ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
#align real_inner_comm real_inner_comm
theorem inner_eq_zero_symm {x y : E} : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ ⟪y, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm]
exact star_eq_zero
#align inner_eq_zero_symm inner_eq_zero_symm
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_im (x : E) : im ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 := by rw [← @ofReal_inj 𝕜, im_eq_conj_sub]; simp
#align inner_self_im inner_self_im
theorem inner_add_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x + y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ + ⟪y, z⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.add_left _ _ _
#align inner_add_left inner_add_left
theorem inner_add_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y + z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪x, z⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_add_left, RingHom.map_add]
simp only [inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_add_right inner_add_right
theorem inner_re_symm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ = re ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align inner_re_symm inner_re_symm
theorem inner_im_symm (x y : E) : im ⟪x, y⟫ = -im ⟪y, x⟫ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_im]
#align inner_im_symm inner_im_symm
theorem inner_smul_left (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪r • x, y⟫ = r† * ⟪x, y⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.smul_left _ _ _
#align inner_smul_left inner_smul_left
theorem real_inner_smul_left (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪r • x, y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_left real_inner_smul_left
theorem inner_smul_real_left (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪(r : 𝕜) • x, y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_left, conj_ofReal, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_left inner_smul_real_left
theorem inner_smul_right (x y : E) (r : 𝕜) : ⟪x, r • y⟫ = r * ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_mul, conj_conj, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_smul_right inner_smul_right
theorem real_inner_smul_right (x y : F) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, r • y⟫_ℝ = r * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ :=
inner_smul_right _ _ _
#align real_inner_smul_right real_inner_smul_right
theorem inner_smul_real_right (x y : E) (r : ℝ) : ⟪x, (r : 𝕜) • y⟫ = r • ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [inner_smul_right, Algebra.smul_def]
rfl
#align inner_smul_real_right inner_smul_real_right
/-- The inner product as a sesquilinear form.
Note that in the case `𝕜 = ℝ` this is a bilinear form. -/
@[simps!]
def sesqFormOfInner : E →ₗ[𝕜] E →ₗ⋆[𝕜] 𝕜 :=
LinearMap.mk₂'ₛₗ (RingHom.id 𝕜) (starRingEnd _) (fun x y => ⟪y, x⟫)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_right _ _ _) (fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_right _ _ _)
(fun _x _y _z => inner_add_left _ _ _) fun _r _x _y => inner_smul_left _ _ _
#align sesq_form_of_inner sesqFormOfInner
/-- The real inner product as a bilinear form.
Note that unlike `sesqFormOfInner`, this does not reverse the order of the arguments. -/
@[simps!]
def bilinFormOfRealInner : BilinForm ℝ F := sesqFormOfInner.flip
#align bilin_form_of_real_inner bilinFormOfRealInner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left. -/
theorem sum_inner {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, f i, x⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪f i, x⟫ :=
map_sum (sesqFormOfInner (𝕜 := 𝕜) (E := E) x) _ _
#align sum_inner sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right. -/
theorem inner_sum {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, ∑ i ∈ s, f i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, ⟪x, f i⟫ :=
map_sum (LinearMap.flip sesqFormOfInner x) _ _
#align inner_sum inner_sum
/-- An inner product with a sum on the left, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i, x⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => conj a • ⟪v i, x⟫ := by
convert _root_.sum_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_left, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.sum_inner Finsupp.sum_inner
/-- An inner product with a sum on the right, `Finsupp` version. -/
theorem Finsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (v : ι → E) (x : E) :
⟪x, l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • v i⟫ = l.sum fun (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) => a • ⟪x, v i⟫ := by
convert _root_.inner_sum (𝕜 := 𝕜) l.support (fun a => l a • v a) x
simp only [inner_smul_right, Finsupp.sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align finsupp.inner_sum Finsupp.inner_sum
theorem DFinsupp.sum_inner {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪l.sum f, x⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪f i a, x⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.sum_inner, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.sum_inner DFinsupp.sum_inner
theorem DFinsupp.inner_sum {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, AddZeroClass (α i)] [∀ (i) (x : α i), Decidable (x ≠ 0)] (f : ∀ i, α i → E)
(l : Π₀ i, α i) (x : E) : ⟪x, l.sum f⟫ = l.sum fun i a => ⟪x, f i a⟫ := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [DFinsupp.sum, _root_.inner_sum, smul_eq_mul]
#align dfinsupp.inner_sum DFinsupp.inner_sum
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_left (x : E) : ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), inner_smul_left, RingHom.map_zero, zero_mul]
#align inner_zero_left inner_zero_left
theorem inner_re_zero_left (x : E) : re ⟪0, x⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_left, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_left inner_re_zero_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_zero_right (x : E) : ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_zero_left, RingHom.map_zero]
#align inner_zero_right inner_zero_right
theorem inner_re_zero_right (x : E) : re ⟪x, 0⟫ = 0 := by
simp only [inner_zero_right, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
#align inner_re_zero_right inner_re_zero_right
theorem inner_self_nonneg {x : E} : 0 ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ :=
InnerProductSpace.toCore.nonneg_re x
#align inner_self_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
theorem real_inner_self_nonneg {x : F} : 0 ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_nonneg ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_nonneg real_inner_self_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_ofReal_re (x : E) : (re ⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ :=
((RCLike.is_real_TFAE (⟪x, x⟫ : 𝕜)).out 2 3).2 (inner_self_im _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_re_to_K inner_self_ofReal_re
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫ = (‖x‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 := by
rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re, ← norm_sq_eq_inner, ofReal_pow]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K
theorem inner_self_re_eq_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖⟪x, x⟫‖ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← inner_self_ofReal_re]
symm
exact norm_of_nonneg inner_self_nonneg
#align inner_self_re_eq_norm inner_self_re_eq_norm
theorem inner_self_ofReal_norm (x : E) : (‖⟪x, x⟫‖ : 𝕜) = ⟪x, x⟫ := by
rw [← inner_self_re_eq_norm]
exact inner_self_ofReal_re _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align inner_self_norm_to_K inner_self_ofReal_norm
theorem real_inner_self_abs (x : F) : |⟪x, x⟫_ℝ| = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@inner_self_ofReal_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_abs real_inner_self_abs
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_eq_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, sq_eq_zero_iff, ofReal_eq_zero, norm_eq_zero]
#align inner_self_eq_zero inner_self_eq_zero
theorem inner_self_ne_zero {x : E} : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
inner_self_eq_zero.not
#align inner_self_ne_zero inner_self_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem inner_self_nonpos {x : E} : re ⟪x, x⟫ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sq_eq_inner, (sq_nonneg _).le_iff_eq, sq_eq_zero_iff, norm_eq_zero]
#align inner_self_nonpos inner_self_nonpos
theorem real_inner_self_nonpos {x : F} : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ ≤ 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
@inner_self_nonpos ℝ F _ _ _ x
#align real_inner_self_nonpos real_inner_self_nonpos
theorem norm_inner_symm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ = ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, norm_conj]
#align norm_inner_symm norm_inner_symm
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_left (x y : E) : ⟪-x, y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜 x, inner_smul_left]
simp
#align inner_neg_left inner_neg_left
@[simp]
theorem inner_neg_right (x y : E) : ⟪x, -y⟫ = -⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, inner_neg_left]; simp only [RingHom.map_neg, inner_conj_symm]
#align inner_neg_right inner_neg_right
theorem inner_neg_neg (x y : E) : ⟪-x, -y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by simp
#align inner_neg_neg inner_neg_neg
-- Porting note: removed `simp` because it can prove it using `inner_conj_symm`
theorem inner_self_conj (x : E) : ⟪x, x⟫† = ⟪x, x⟫ := inner_conj_symm _ _
#align inner_self_conj inner_self_conj
theorem inner_sub_left (x y z : E) : ⟪x - y, z⟫ = ⟪x, z⟫ - ⟪y, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_left]
#align inner_sub_left inner_sub_left
theorem inner_sub_right (x y z : E) : ⟪x, y - z⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪x, z⟫ := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, inner_add_right]
#align inner_sub_right inner_sub_right
theorem inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm (x y : E) : re (⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫) = ‖⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪y, x⟫‖ := by
rw [← inner_conj_symm, mul_comm]
exact re_eq_norm_of_mul_conj (inner y x)
#align inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm inner_mul_symm_re_eq_norm
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫` -/
theorem inner_add_add_self (x y : E) : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪x, y⟫ + ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_add_left, inner_add_right]; ring
#align inner_add_add_self inner_add_add_self
/-- Expand `⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_add_add_self (x y : F) :
⟪x + y, x + y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_add_add_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
#align real_inner_add_add_self real_inner_add_add_self
-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫`
theorem inner_sub_sub_self (x y : E) : ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = ⟪x, x⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ - ⟪y, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫ := by
simp only [inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right]; ring
#align inner_sub_sub_self inner_sub_sub_self
/-- Expand `⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ` -/
theorem real_inner_sub_sub_self (x y : F) :
⟪x - y, x - y⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := by
have : ⟪y, x⟫_ℝ = ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ := by rw [← inner_conj_symm]; rfl
simp only [inner_sub_sub_self, this, add_left_inj]
ring
#align real_inner_sub_sub_self real_inner_sub_sub_self
variable (𝕜)
theorem ext_inner_left {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪v, x⟫ = ⟪v, y⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_right, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
#align ext_inner_left ext_inner_left
theorem ext_inner_right {x y : E} (h : ∀ v, ⟪x, v⟫ = ⟪y, v⟫) : x = y := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← @inner_self_eq_zero 𝕜, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero, h (x - y)]
#align ext_inner_right ext_inner_right
variable {𝕜}
/-- Parallelogram law -/
theorem parallelogram_law {x y : E} : ⟪x + y, x + y⟫ + ⟪x - y, x - y⟫ = 2 * (⟪x, x⟫ + ⟪y, y⟫) := by
simp only [inner_add_add_self, inner_sub_sub_self]
ring
#align parallelogram_law parallelogram_law
/-- **Cauchy–Schwarz inequality**. -/
theorem inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫‖ ≤ re ⟪x, x⟫ * re ⟪y, y⟫ :=
letI c : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
InnerProductSpace.Core.inner_mul_inner_self_le x y
#align inner_mul_inner_self_le inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality for real inner products. -/
theorem real_inner_mul_inner_self_le (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ :=
calc
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖⟪x, y⟫_ℝ‖ * ‖⟪y, x⟫_ℝ‖ := by
rw [real_inner_comm y, ← norm_mul]
exact le_abs_self _
_ ≤ ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ * ⟪y, y⟫_ℝ := @inner_mul_inner_self_le ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
#align real_inner_mul_inner_self_le real_inner_mul_inner_self_le
/-- A family of vectors is linearly independent if they are nonzero
and orthogonal. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero {ι : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hz : ∀ i, v i ≠ 0)
(ho : Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0) : LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s g hg i hi
have h' : g i * inner (v i) (v i) = inner (v i) (∑ j ∈ s, g j • v j) := by
rw [inner_sum]
symm
convert Finset.sum_eq_single (β := 𝕜) i ?_ ?_
· rw [inner_smul_right]
· intro j _hj hji
rw [inner_smul_right, ho hji.symm, mul_zero]
· exact fun h => False.elim (h hi)
simpa [hg, hz] using h'
#align linear_independent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero linearIndependent_of_ne_zero_of_inner_eq_zero
end BasicProperties
section OrthonormalSets
variable {ι : Type*} (𝕜)
/-- An orthonormal set of vectors in an `InnerProductSpace` -/
def Orthonormal (v : ι → E) : Prop :=
(∀ i, ‖v i‖ = 1) ∧ Pairwise fun i j => ⟪v i, v j⟫ = 0
#align orthonormal Orthonormal
variable {𝕜}
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of an indexed set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner
product equals Kronecker delta.) -/
theorem orthonormal_iff_ite [DecidableEq ι] {v : ι → E} :
Orthonormal 𝕜 v ↔ ∀ i j, ⟪v i, v j⟫ = if i = j then (1 : 𝕜) else (0 : 𝕜) := by
constructor
· intro hv i j
split_ifs with h
· simp [h, inner_self_eq_norm_sq_to_K, hv.1]
· exact hv.2 h
· intro h
constructor
· intro i
have h' : ‖v i‖ ^ 2 = 1 ^ 2 := by simp [@norm_sq_eq_inner 𝕜, h i i]
have h₁ : 0 ≤ ‖v i‖ := norm_nonneg _
have h₂ : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 := zero_le_one
rwa [sq_eq_sq h₁ h₂] at h'
· intro i j hij
simpa [hij] using h i j
#align orthonormal_iff_ite orthonormal_iff_ite
/-- `if ... then ... else` characterization of a set of vectors being orthonormal. (Inner product
equals Kronecker delta.) -/
theorem orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite [DecidableEq E] {s : Set E} :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : s → E) ↔ ∀ v ∈ s, ∀ w ∈ s, ⟪v, w⟫ = if v = w then 1 else 0 := by
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite]
constructor
· intro h v hv w hw
convert h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ using 1
simp
· rintro h ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩
convert h v hv w hw using 1
simp
#align orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪v i, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = l i := by
classical
simpa [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.inner_sum, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv] using Eq.symm
#align orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp Orthonormal.inner_right_finsupp
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) {s : Finset ι}
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : ⟪v i, ∑ i ∈ s, l i • v i⟫ = l i := by
classical
simp [inner_sum, inner_smul_right, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, hi]
#align orthonormal.inner_right_sum Orthonormal.inner_right_sum
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_right_fintype [Fintype ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜)
(i : ι) : ⟪v i, ∑ i : ι, l i • v i⟫ = l i :=
hv.inner_right_sum l (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align orthonormal.inner_right_fintype Orthonormal.inner_right_fintype
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι →₀ 𝕜) (i : ι) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = conj (l i) := by rw [← inner_conj_symm, hv.inner_right_finsupp]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp Orthonormal.inner_left_finsupp
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜) {s : Finset ι}
{i : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) : ⟪∑ i ∈ s, l i • v i, v i⟫ = conj (l i) := by
classical
simp only [sum_inner, inner_smul_left, orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, hi, mul_boole,
Finset.sum_ite_eq', if_true]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_sum Orthonormal.inner_left_sum
/-- The inner product of a linear combination of a set of orthonormal vectors with one of those
vectors picks out the coefficient of that vector. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_fintype [Fintype ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l : ι → 𝕜)
(i : ι) : ⟪∑ i : ι, l i • v i, v i⟫ = conj (l i) :=
hv.inner_left_sum l (Finset.mem_univ _)
#align orthonormal.inner_left_fintype Orthonormal.inner_left_fintype
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum over the first `Finsupp`. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι →₀ 𝕜) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₁, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₂⟫ = l₁.sum fun i y => conj y * l₂ i := by
simp only [l₁.total_apply _, Finsupp.sum_inner, hv.inner_right_finsupp, smul_eq_mul]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum over the second `Finsupp`. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι →₀ 𝕜) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₁, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l₂⟫ = l₂.sum fun i y => conj (l₁ i) * y := by
simp only [l₂.total_apply _, Finsupp.inner_sum, hv.inner_left_finsupp, mul_comm, smul_eq_mul]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_right
/-- The inner product of two linear combinations of a set of orthonormal vectors, expressed as
a sum. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_sum {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (l₁ l₂ : ι → 𝕜) (s : Finset ι) :
⟪∑ i ∈ s, l₁ i • v i, ∑ i ∈ s, l₂ i • v i⟫ = ∑ i ∈ s, conj (l₁ i) * l₂ i := by
simp_rw [sum_inner, inner_smul_left]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hv.inner_right_sum l₂ hi]
#align orthonormal.inner_sum Orthonormal.inner_sum
/--
The double sum of weighted inner products of pairs of vectors from an orthonormal sequence is the
sum of the weights.
-/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset {s : Finset ι} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{a : ι → ι → 𝕜} : (∑ i ∈ s, ∑ j ∈ s, a i j • ⟪v j, v i⟫) = ∑ k ∈ s, a k k := by
classical
simp [orthonormal_iff_ite.mp hv, Finset.sum_ite_of_true]
#align orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset Orthonormal.inner_left_right_finset
/-- An orthonormal set is linearly independent. -/
theorem Orthonormal.linearIndependent {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
LinearIndependent 𝕜 v := by
rw [linearIndependent_iff]
intro l hl
ext i
have key : ⟪v i, Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l⟫ = ⟪v i, 0⟫ := by rw [hl]
simpa only [hv.inner_right_finsupp, inner_zero_right] using key
#align orthonormal.linear_independent Orthonormal.linearIndependent
/-- A subfamily of an orthonormal family (i.e., a composition with an injective map) is an
orthonormal family. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp {ι' : Type*} {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : ι' → ι)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : Orthonormal 𝕜 (v ∘ f) := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite] at hv ⊢
intro i j
convert hv (f i) (f j) using 1
simp [hf.eq_iff]
#align orthonormal.comp Orthonormal.comp
/-- An injective family `v : ι → E` is orthonormal if and only if `Subtype.val : (range v) → E` is
orthonormal. -/
theorem orthonormal_subtype_range {v : ι → E} (hv : Function.Injective v) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : Set.range v → E) ↔ Orthonormal 𝕜 v := by
let f : ι ≃ Set.range v := Equiv.ofInjective v hv
refine ⟨fun h => h.comp f f.injective, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [← Equiv.self_comp_ofInjective_symm hv]
exact h.comp f.symm f.symm.injective
#align orthonormal_subtype_range orthonormal_subtype_range
/-- If `v : ι → E` is an orthonormal family, then `Subtype.val : (range v) → E` is an orthonormal
family. -/
theorem Orthonormal.toSubtypeRange {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : Set.range v → E) :=
(orthonormal_subtype_range hv.linearIndependent.injective).2 hv
#align orthonormal.to_subtype_range Orthonormal.toSubtypeRange
/-- A linear combination of some subset of an orthonormal set is orthogonal to other members of the
set. -/
theorem Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {s : Set ι} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∉ s) {l : ι →₀ 𝕜} (hl : l ∈ Finsupp.supported 𝕜 𝕜 s) :
⟪Finsupp.total ι E 𝕜 v l, v i⟫ = 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_supported'] at hl
simp only [hv.inner_left_finsupp, hl i hi, map_zero]
#align orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero Orthonormal.inner_finsupp_eq_zero
/-- Given an orthonormal family, a second family of vectors is orthonormal if every vector equals
the corresponding vector in the original family or its negation. -/
theorem Orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg {v w : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hw : ∀ i, w i = v i ∨ w i = -v i) : Orthonormal 𝕜 w := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_iff_ite] at *
intro i j
cases' hw i with hi hi <;> cases' hw j with hj hj <;>
replace hv := hv i j <;> split_ifs at hv ⊢ with h <;>
simpa only [hi, hj, h, inner_neg_right, inner_neg_left, neg_neg, eq_self_iff_true,
neg_eq_zero] using hv
#align orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg Orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg
/- The material that follows, culminating in the existence of a maximal orthonormal subset, is
adapted from the corresponding development of the theory of linearly independents sets. See
`exists_linearIndependent` in particular. -/
variable (𝕜 E)
theorem orthonormal_empty : Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : (∅ : Set E) → E) := by
classical
simp [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite]
#align orthonormal_empty orthonormal_empty
variable {𝕜 E}
theorem orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed {η : Type*} {s : η → Set E} (hs : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ i, Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : s i → E)) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : (⋃ i, s i) → E) := by
classical
rw [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite]
rintro x ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hxi⟩ y ⟨_, ⟨j, rfl⟩, hyj⟩
obtain ⟨k, hik, hjk⟩ := hs i j
have h_orth : Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : s k → E) := h k
rw [orthonormal_subtype_iff_ite] at h_orth
exact h_orth x (hik hxi) y (hjk hyj)
#align orthonormal_Union_of_directed orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed
theorem orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed {s : Set (Set E)} (hs : DirectedOn (· ⊆ ·) s)
(h : ∀ a ∈ s, Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => ((x : a) : E))) :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (fun x => x : ⋃₀ s → E) := by
rw [Set.sUnion_eq_iUnion]; exact orthonormal_iUnion_of_directed hs.directed_val (by simpa using h)
#align orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed
/-- Given an orthonormal set `v` of vectors in `E`, there exists a maximal orthonormal set
containing it. -/
theorem exists_maximal_orthonormal {s : Set E} (hs : Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : s → E)) :
∃ w ⊇ s, Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : w → E) ∧
∀ u ⊇ w, Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : u → E) → u = w := by
have := zorn_subset_nonempty { b | Orthonormal 𝕜 (Subtype.val : b → E) } ?_ _ hs
· obtain ⟨b, bi, sb, h⟩ := this
refine ⟨b, sb, bi, ?_⟩
exact fun u hus hu => h u hu hus
· refine fun c hc cc _c0 => ⟨⋃₀ c, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact orthonormal_sUnion_of_directed cc.directedOn fun x xc => hc xc
· exact fun _ => Set.subset_sUnion_of_mem
#align exists_maximal_orthonormal exists_maximal_orthonormal
theorem Orthonormal.ne_zero {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (i : ι) : v i ≠ 0 := by
have : ‖v i‖ ≠ 0 := by
rw [hv.1 i]
norm_num
simpa using this
#align orthonormal.ne_zero Orthonormal.ne_zero
open FiniteDimensional
/-- A family of orthonormal vectors with the correct cardinality forms a basis. -/
def basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(card_eq : Fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) : Basis ι 𝕜 E :=
basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank hv.linearIndependent card_eq
#align basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank
@[simp]
theorem coe_basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank [Fintype ι] [Nonempty ι] {v : ι → E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (card_eq : Fintype.card ι = finrank 𝕜 E) :
(basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank hv card_eq : ι → E) = v :=
coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank _ _
#align coe_basis_of_orthonormal_of_card_eq_finrank coe_basisOfOrthonormalOfCardEqFinrank
end OrthonormalSets
section Norm
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_inner (x : E) : ‖x‖ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) :=
calc
‖x‖ = √(‖x‖ ^ 2) := (sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)).symm
_ = √(re ⟪x, x⟫) := congr_arg _ (norm_sq_eq_inner _)
#align norm_eq_sqrt_inner norm_eq_sqrt_inner
theorem norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner (x : F) : ‖x‖ = √⟪x, x⟫_ℝ :=
@norm_eq_sqrt_inner ℝ _ _ _ _ x
#align norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner norm_eq_sqrt_real_inner
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
rw [@norm_eq_sqrt_inner 𝕜, ← sqrt_mul inner_self_nonneg (re ⟪x, x⟫),
sqrt_mul_self inner_self_nonneg]
#align inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : E) : re ⟪x, x⟫ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align inner_self_eq_norm_sq inner_self_eq_norm_sq
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ := by
have h := @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ F _ _ _ x
simpa using h
#align real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm
theorem real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq (x : F) : ⟪x, x⟫_ℝ = ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [pow_two, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
#align real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq real_inner_self_eq_norm_sq
-- Porting note: this was present in mathlib3 but seemingly didn't do anything.
-- variable (𝕜)
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq (x y : E) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
repeat' rw [sq (M := ℝ), ← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [inner_add_add_self, two_mul]
simp only [add_assoc, add_left_inj, add_right_inj, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rw [← inner_conj_symm, conj_re]
#align norm_add_sq norm_add_sq
alias norm_add_pow_two := norm_add_sq
#align norm_add_pow_two norm_add_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x + y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
have h := @norm_add_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_add_sq_real norm_add_sq_real
alias norm_add_pow_two_real := norm_add_sq_real
#align norm_add_pow_two_real norm_add_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_add_sq _ _
#align norm_add_mul_self norm_add_mul_self
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_add_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_add_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_add_mul_self_real norm_add_mul_self_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq (x y : E) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, @norm_add_sq 𝕜 _ _ _ _ x (-y), norm_neg, inner_neg_right, map_neg, mul_neg,
sub_eq_add_neg]
#align norm_sub_sq norm_sub_sq
alias norm_sub_pow_two := norm_sub_sq
#align norm_sub_pow_two norm_sub_pow_two
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_real (x y : F) : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = ‖x‖ ^ 2 - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ ^ 2 :=
@norm_sub_sq ℝ _ _ _ _ _ _
#align norm_sub_sq_real norm_sub_sq_real
alias norm_sub_pow_two_real := norm_sub_sq_real
#align norm_sub_pow_two_real norm_sub_pow_two_real
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self (x y : E) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * re ⟪x, y⟫ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
repeat' rw [← sq (M := ℝ)]
exact norm_sub_sq _ _
#align norm_sub_mul_self norm_sub_mul_self
/-- Expand the square -/
theorem norm_sub_mul_self_real (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - 2 * ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
have h := @norm_sub_mul_self ℝ _ _ _ _ x y
simpa using h
#align norm_sub_mul_self_real norm_sub_mul_self_real
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem norm_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [norm_eq_sqrt_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) x, norm_eq_sqrt_inner (𝕜 := 𝕜) y]
letI : InnerProductSpace.Core 𝕜 E := InnerProductSpace.toCore
exact InnerProductSpace.Core.norm_inner_le_norm x y
#align norm_inner_le_norm norm_inner_le_norm
theorem nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm (x y : E) : ‖⟪x, y⟫‖₊ ≤ ‖x‖₊ * ‖y‖₊ :=
norm_inner_le_norm x y
#align nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm nnnorm_inner_le_nnnorm
theorem re_inner_le_norm (x y : E) : re ⟪x, y⟫ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (re_le_norm (inner x y)) (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
#align re_inner_le_norm re_inner_le_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem abs_real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : |⟪x, y⟫_ℝ| ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(Real.norm_eq_abs _).ge.trans (norm_inner_le_norm x y)
#align abs_real_inner_le_norm abs_real_inner_le_norm
/-- Cauchy–Schwarz inequality with norm -/
theorem real_inner_le_norm (x y : F) : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ ≤ ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ :=
le_trans (le_abs_self _) (abs_real_inner_le_norm _ _)
#align real_inner_le_norm real_inner_le_norm
variable (𝕜)
theorem parallelogram_law_with_norm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ + ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = 2 * (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm 𝕜]
rw [← re.map_add, parallelogram_law, two_mul, two_mul]
simp only [re.map_add]
#align parallelogram_law_with_norm parallelogram_law_with_norm
theorem parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm (x y : E) :
‖x + y‖₊ * ‖x + y‖₊ + ‖x - y‖₊ * ‖x - y‖₊ = 2 * (‖x‖₊ * ‖x‖₊ + ‖y‖₊ * ‖y‖₊) :=
Subtype.ext <| parallelogram_law_with_norm 𝕜 x y
#align parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm parallelogram_law_with_nnnorm
variable {𝕜}
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
re ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 4 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜]
ring
#align re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four
/-- Polarization identity: The imaginary part of the inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four (x y : E) :
im ⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x - IK • y‖ * ‖x - IK • y‖ - ‖x + IK • y‖ * ‖x + IK • y‖) / 4 := by
simp only [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, @norm_sub_mul_self 𝕜, inner_smul_right, I_mul_re]
ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align im_inner_eq_norm_sub_I_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_I_smul_mul_self_div_four im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four
/-- Polarization identity: The inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four (x y : E) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x + y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x - y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 +
((‖x - IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2 - (‖x + IK • y‖ : 𝕜) ^ 2) * IK) / 4 := by
rw [← re_add_im ⟪x, y⟫, re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_four,
im_inner_eq_norm_sub_i_smul_mul_self_sub_norm_add_i_smul_mul_self_div_four]
push_cast
simp only [sq, ← mul_div_right_comm, ← add_div]
#align inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four
/-- Formula for the distance between the images of two nonzero points under an inversion with center
zero. See also `EuclideanGeometry.dist_inversion_inversion` for inversions around a general
point. -/
theorem dist_div_norm_sq_smul {x y : F} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (R : ℝ) :
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y :=
have hx' : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx
have hy' : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy
calc
dist ((R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x) ((R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y) =
√(‖(R / ‖x‖) ^ 2 • x - (R / ‖y‖) ^ 2 • y‖ ^ 2) := by
rw [dist_eq_norm, sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
_ = √((R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) ^ 2 * ‖x - y‖ ^ 2) :=
congr_arg sqrt <| by
field_simp [sq, norm_sub_mul_self_real, norm_smul, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)]
ring
_ = R ^ 2 / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) * dist x y := by
rw [sqrt_mul, sqrt_sq, sqrt_sq, dist_eq_norm] <;> positivity
#align dist_div_norm_sq_smul dist_div_norm_sq_smul
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) InnerProductSpace.toUniformConvexSpace : UniformConvexSpace F :=
⟨fun ε hε => by
refine
⟨2 - √(4 - ε ^ 2), sub_pos_of_lt <| (sqrt_lt' zero_lt_two).2 ?_, fun x hx y hy hxy => ?_⟩
· norm_num
exact pow_pos hε _
rw [sub_sub_cancel]
refine le_sqrt_of_sq_le ?_
rw [sq, eq_sub_iff_add_eq.2 (parallelogram_law_with_norm ℝ x y), ← sq ‖x - y‖, hx, hy]
ring_nf
exact sub_le_sub_left (pow_le_pow_left hε.le hxy _) 4⟩
#align inner_product_space.to_uniform_convex_space InnerProductSpace.toUniformConvexSpace
section Complex
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℂ V]
/-- A complex polarization identity, with a linear map
-/
theorem inner_map_polarization (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) (x y : V) :
⟪T y, x⟫_ℂ =
(⟪T (x + y), x + y⟫_ℂ - ⟪T (x - y), x - y⟫_ℂ +
Complex.I * ⟪T (x + Complex.I • y), x + Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ -
Complex.I * ⟪T (x - Complex.I • y), x - Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ) /
4 := by
simp only [map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left, inner_add_right, LinearMap.map_smul, inner_smul_left,
inner_smul_right, Complex.conj_I, ← pow_two, Complex.I_sq, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_neg, neg_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, one_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_sub, sub_sub]
ring
#align inner_map_polarization inner_map_polarization
theorem inner_map_polarization' (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) (x y : V) :
⟪T x, y⟫_ℂ =
(⟪T (x + y), x + y⟫_ℂ - ⟪T (x - y), x - y⟫_ℂ -
Complex.I * ⟪T (x + Complex.I • y), x + Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ +
Complex.I * ⟪T (x - Complex.I • y), x - Complex.I • y⟫_ℂ) /
4 := by
simp only [map_add, map_sub, inner_add_left, inner_add_right, LinearMap.map_smul, inner_smul_left,
inner_smul_right, Complex.conj_I, ← pow_two, Complex.I_sq, inner_sub_left, inner_sub_right,
mul_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_neg, neg_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, one_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_sub, sub_sub]
ring
#align inner_map_polarization' inner_map_polarization'
/-- A linear map `T` is zero, if and only if the identity `⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ = 0` holds for all `x`.
-/
theorem inner_map_self_eq_zero (T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) : (∀ x : V, ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ = 0) ↔ T = 0 := by
constructor
· intro hT
ext x
rw [LinearMap.zero_apply, ← @inner_self_eq_zero ℂ V, inner_map_polarization]
simp only [hT]
norm_num
· rintro rfl x
simp only [LinearMap.zero_apply, inner_zero_left]
#align inner_map_self_eq_zero inner_map_self_eq_zero
/--
Two linear maps `S` and `T` are equal, if and only if the identity `⟪S x, x⟫_ℂ = ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ` holds
for all `x`.
-/
theorem ext_inner_map (S T : V →ₗ[ℂ] V) : (∀ x : V, ⟪S x, x⟫_ℂ = ⟪T x, x⟫_ℂ) ↔ S = T := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← inner_map_self_eq_zero]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
rw [LinearMap.sub_apply, inner_sub_left, sub_eq_zero]
#align ext_inner_map ext_inner_map
end Complex
section
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {ι'' : Type*}
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E']
variable {E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E'']
/-- A linear isometry preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearIsometry.inner_map_map (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) : ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
simp [inner_eq_sum_norm_sq_div_four, ← f.norm_map]
#align linear_isometry.inner_map_map LinearIsometry.inner_map_map
/-- A linear isometric equivalence preserves the inner product. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x y : E) : ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫ :=
f.toLinearIsometry.inner_map_map x y
#align linear_isometry_equiv.inner_map_map LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_map
/-- The adjoint of a linear isometric equivalence is its inverse. -/
theorem LinearIsometryEquiv.inner_map_eq_flip (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') (x : E) (y : E') :
⟪f x, y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, f.symm y⟫_𝕜 := by
conv_lhs => rw [← f.apply_symm_apply y, f.inner_map_map]
/-- A linear map that preserves the inner product is a linear isometry. -/
def LinearMap.isometryOfInner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, fun x => by simp only [@norm_eq_sqrt_inner 𝕜, h]⟩
#align linear_map.isometry_of_inner LinearMap.isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.coe_isometryOfInner (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) : ⇑(f.isometryOfInner h) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_isometry_of_inner LinearMap.coe_isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.isometryOfInner_toLinearMap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometryOfInner h).toLinearMap = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_map LinearMap.isometryOfInner_toLinearMap
/-- A linear equivalence that preserves the inner product is a linear isometric equivalence. -/
def LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h : ∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫ = ⟪x, y⟫) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
⟨f, ((f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E').isometryOfInner h).norm_map⟩
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfInner (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) : ⇑(f.isometryOfInner h) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_isometry_of_inner LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfInner
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner_toLinearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') (h) :
(f.isometryOfInner h).toLinearEquiv = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_inner_to_linear_equiv LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner_toLinearEquiv
/-- A linear map is an isometry if and it preserves the inner product. -/
theorem LinearMap.norm_map_iff_inner_map_map {F : Type*} [FunLike F E E'] [LinearMapClass F 𝕜 E E']
(f : F) : (∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖) ↔ (∀ x y, ⟪f x, f y⟫_𝕜 = ⟪x, y⟫_𝕜) :=
⟨({ toLinearMap := LinearMapClass.linearMap f, norm_map' := · : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' }.inner_map_map),
(LinearMapClass.linearMap f |>.isometryOfInner · |>.norm_map)⟩
/-- A linear isometry preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem LinearIsometry.orthonormal_comp_iff {v : ι → E} (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) ↔ Orthonormal 𝕜 v := by
classical simp_rw [orthonormal_iff_ite, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometry.inner_map_map]
#align linear_isometry.orthonormal_comp_iff LinearIsometry.orthonormal_comp_iff
/-- A linear isometry preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometry {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) := by rwa [f.orthonormal_comp_iff]
#align orthonormal.comp_linear_isometry Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometry
/-- A linear isometric equivalence preserves the property of being orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometryEquiv {v : ι → E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') :
Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v) :=
hv.comp_linearIsometry f.toLinearIsometry
#align orthonormal.comp_linear_isometry_equiv Orthonormal.comp_linearIsometryEquiv
/-- A linear isometric equivalence, applied with `Basis.map`, preserves the property of being
orthonormal. -/
theorem Orthonormal.mapLinearIsometryEquiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(f : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E') : Orthonormal 𝕜 (v.map f.toLinearEquiv) :=
hv.comp_linearIsometryEquiv f
#align orthonormal.map_linear_isometry_equiv Orthonormal.mapLinearIsometryEquiv
/-- A linear map that sends an orthonormal basis to orthonormal vectors is a linear isometry. -/
def LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : E →ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
f.isometryOfInner fun x y => by
classical rw [← v.total_repr x, ← v.total_repr y, Finsupp.apply_total, Finsupp.apply_total,
hv.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left, hf.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left]
#align linear_map.isometry_of_orthonormal LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : ⇑(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.coe_isometry_of_orthonormal LinearMap.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearMap (f : E →ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) :
(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf).toLinearMap = f :=
rfl
#align linear_map.isometry_of_orthonormal_to_linear_map LinearMap.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearMap
/-- A linear equivalence that sends an orthonormal basis to orthonormal vectors is a linear
isometric equivalence. -/
def LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
(hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
f.isometryOfInner fun x y => by
rw [← LinearEquiv.coe_coe] at hf
classical rw [← v.total_repr x, ← v.total_repr y, ← LinearEquiv.coe_coe f, Finsupp.apply_total,
Finsupp.apply_total, hv.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left, hf.inner_finsupp_eq_sum_left]
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_orthonormal LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) : ⇑(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf) = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.coe_isometry_of_orthonormal LinearEquiv.coe_isometryOfOrthonormal
@[simp]
theorem LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearEquiv (f : E ≃ₗ[𝕜] E') {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E}
(hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) (hf : Orthonormal 𝕜 (f ∘ v)) :
(f.isometryOfOrthonormal hv hf).toLinearEquiv = f :=
rfl
#align linear_equiv.isometry_of_orthonormal_to_linear_equiv LinearEquiv.isometryOfOrthonormal_toLinearEquiv
/-- A linear isometric equivalence that sends an orthonormal basis to a given orthonormal basis. -/
def Orthonormal.equiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] E' :=
(v.equiv v' e).isometryOfOrthonormal hv
(by
have h : v.equiv v' e ∘ v = v' ∘ e := by
ext i
simp
rw [h]
classical exact hv'.comp _ e.injective)
#align orthonormal.equiv Orthonormal.equiv
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_toLinearEquiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'} (hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
(hv.equiv hv' e).toLinearEquiv = v.equiv v' e :=
rfl
#align orthonormal.equiv_to_linear_equiv Orthonormal.equiv_toLinearEquiv
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_apply {ι' : Type*} {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v)
{v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'} (hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') (i : ι) :
hv.equiv hv' e (v i) = v' (e i) :=
Basis.equiv_apply _ _ _ _
#align orthonormal.equiv_apply Orthonormal.equiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_refl {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) :
hv.equiv hv (Equiv.refl ι) = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl 𝕜 E :=
v.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i => by
simp only [Orthonormal.equiv_apply, Equiv.coe_refl, id, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_refl]
#align orthonormal.equiv_refl Orthonormal.equiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_symm {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') : (hv.equiv hv' e).symm = hv'.equiv hv e.symm :=
v'.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i =>
(hv.equiv hv' e).injective <| by
simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.apply_symm_apply, Orthonormal.equiv_apply, e.apply_symm_apply]
#align orthonormal.equiv_symm Orthonormal.equiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem Orthonormal.equiv_trans {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') {v'' : Basis ι'' 𝕜 E''} (hv'' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v'')
(e' : ι' ≃ ι'') : (hv.equiv hv' e).trans (hv'.equiv hv'' e') = hv.equiv hv'' (e.trans e') :=
v.ext_linearIsometryEquiv fun i => by
simp only [LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, Orthonormal.equiv_apply, e.coe_trans,
Function.comp_apply]
#align orthonormal.equiv_trans Orthonormal.equiv_trans
theorem Orthonormal.map_equiv {v : Basis ι 𝕜 E} (hv : Orthonormal 𝕜 v) {v' : Basis ι' 𝕜 E'}
(hv' : Orthonormal 𝕜 v') (e : ι ≃ ι') :
v.map (hv.equiv hv' e).toLinearEquiv = v'.reindex e.symm :=
v.map_equiv _ _
#align orthonormal.map_equiv Orthonormal.map_equiv
end
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ - ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ - ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two x y
#align real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two real_inner_eq_norm_add_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_mul_self_div_two
/-- Polarization identity: The real inner product, in terms of the norm. -/
theorem real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two (x y : F) :
⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = (‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - ‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖) / 2 :=
re_to_real.symm.trans <|
re_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two x y
#align real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two real_inner_eq_norm_mul_self_add_norm_mul_self_sub_norm_sub_mul_self_div_two
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-only-if vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, if-and-if vector inner product form using square roots. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x + y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm,
sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _)]
#align norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_add_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero (x y : E) (h : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ := by
rw [@norm_add_mul_self 𝕜, add_right_cancel_iff, add_right_eq_self, mul_eq_zero]
apply Or.inr
simp only [h, zero_re']
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_of_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, vector inner product form. -/
theorem norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x + y‖ * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
#align norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-only-if vector
inner product form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero (x y : F) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [@norm_sub_mul_self ℝ, add_right_cancel_iff, sub_eq_add_neg, add_right_eq_self, neg_eq_zero,
mul_eq_zero]
norm_num
#align norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, if-and-if vector inner product form using square
roots. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero {x y : F} :
‖x - y‖ = √(‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0 := by
rw [← norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero, eq_comm,
sqrt_eq_iff_mul_self_eq (add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _)]
#align norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero norm_sub_eq_sqrt_iff_real_inner_eq_zero
/-- Pythagorean theorem, subtracting vectors, vector inner product
form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real {x y : F} (h : ⟪x, y⟫_ℝ = 0) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ :=
(norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_iff_real_inner_eq_zero x y).2 h
#align norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real
/-- The sum and difference of two vectors are orthogonal if and only
if they have the same norm. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Basic.lean | 1,502 | 1,511 | theorem real_inner_add_sub_eq_zero_iff (x y : F) : ⟪x + y, x - y⟫_ℝ = 0 ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by |
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_self_inj_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)]
simp only [← @inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm ℝ, inner_add_left, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm y x,
sub_eq_zero, re_to_real]
constructor
· intro h
rw [add_comm] at h
linarith
· intro h
linarith
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid in which a set `B` is a base if and only if `B ⊆ M.E`
and `M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_base.imp (fun B hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_base_subset_union_base hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I'⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_basis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_base_subset_union_base hB
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E,
⟨?_, subset_inter (subset_diff.mpr ?_) hI'E, inter_subset_left.trans
diff_subset⟩, ?_⟩
· simp only [inter_subset_right, true_and]
exact ⟨B', hB', disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
· rw [and_iff_right hI'X]
refine disjoint_of_subset_right hB'IB ?_
rw [disjoint_union_right, and_iff_left hI'B]
exact disjoint_of_subset hI'X hI.subset disjoint_sdiff_right
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, subset_inter_iff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
intros J hJE B'' hB'' hdj _ hJX hssJ
rw [and_iff_left hJE]
rw [diff_eq, inter_right_comm, ← diff_eq, diff_subset_iff] at hssJ
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset,
← inter_eq_self_of_subset_left hB''.subset_ground, inter_right_comm, inter_assoc]
calc _ ⊆ _ := inter_subset_inter_right _ hssJ
_ ⊆ _ := by rw [inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, union_empty]
_ ⊆ _ := inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_base_subset_union_base hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
have : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩
(hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he ?_))
refine (subset_union_of_subset_right (subset_diff.mpr ⟨hIB',?_⟩) _).trans hI'B₁
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hI.subset disjoint_sdiff_left
subst this
refine subset_diff.mpr ⟨hJX, by_contra (fun hne ↦ ?_)⟩
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hne
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues. )-/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B) := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.Base B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.Base B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_base_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) : M✶.Base B ↔ M.Base (M.E \ B) := by
rw [base_compl_iff_mem_maximals_disjoint_base, base_iff_maximal_indep, dual_indep_iff_exists',
mem_maximals_setOf_iff]
simp [dual_indep_iff_exists']
theorem dual_base_iff' : M✶.Base B ↔ M.Base (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_base_iff, and_iff_left h])
(fun h ↦ iff_of_false (h ∘ (fun h' ↦ h'.subset_ground)) (h ∘ And.right))
theorem setOf_dual_base_eq : {B | M✶.Base B} = (fun X ↦ M.E \ X) '' {B | M.Base B} := by
ext B
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, dual_base_iff']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨_, h.1, diff_diff_cancel_left h.2⟩,
fun ⟨B', hB', h⟩ ↦ ⟨?_,h.symm.trans_subset diff_subset⟩⟩
rwa [← h, diff_diff_cancel_left hB'.subset_ground]
@[simp] theorem dual_dual (M : Matroid α) : M✶✶ = M :=
eq_of_base_iff_base_forall rfl (fun B (h : B ⊆ M.E) ↦
by rw [dual_base_iff, dual_base_iff, dual_ground, diff_diff_cancel_left h])
theorem dual_involutive : Function.Involutive (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) := dual_dual
theorem dual_injective : Function.Injective (dual : Matroid α → Matroid α) :=
dual_involutive.injective
@[simp] theorem dual_inj {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁✶ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁ = M₂ :=
dual_injective.eq_iff
theorem eq_dual_comm {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₂ = M₁✶ := by
rw [← dual_inj, dual_dual, eq_comm]
theorem eq_dual_iff_dual_eq {M₁ M₂ : Matroid α} : M₁ = M₂✶ ↔ M₁✶ = M₂ :=
dual_involutive.eq_iff.symm
theorem Base.compl_base_of_dual (h : M✶.Base B) : M.Base (M.E \ B) :=
(dual_base_iff'.1 h).1
theorem Base.compl_base_dual (h : M.Base B) : M✶.Base (M.E \ B) := by
rwa [dual_base_iff, diff_diff_cancel_left h.subset_ground]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 182 | 201 | theorem Base.compl_inter_basis_of_inter_basis (hB : M.Base B) (hBX : M.Basis (B ∩ X) X) :
M✶.Basis ((M.E \ B) ∩ (M.E \ X)) (M.E \ X) := by |
refine Indep.basis_of_forall_insert ?_ inter_subset_right (fun e he ↦ ?_)
· rw [dual_indep_iff_exists]
exact ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_left⟩
simp only [diff_inter_self_eq_diff, mem_diff, not_and, not_not, imp_iff_right he.1.1] at he
simp_rw [dual_dep_iff_forall, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_right he.1.1,
and_iff_left (inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset)]
refine fun B' hB' ↦ by_contra (fun hem ↦ ?_)
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, not_ne_iff, ← union_singleton, diff_inter_diff,
union_inter_distrib_right, union_empty_iff, singleton_inter_eq_empty, diff_eq,
inter_right_comm, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hB'.subset_ground, ← diff_eq,
diff_eq_empty] at hem
obtain ⟨f, hfb, hBf⟩ := hB.exchange hB' ⟨he.2, hem.2⟩
have hi : M.Indep (insert f (B ∩ X)) := by
refine hBf.indep.subset (insert_subset_insert ?_)
simp_rw [subset_diff, and_iff_right inter_subset_left, disjoint_singleton_right,
mem_inter_iff, iff_false_intro he.1.2, and_false, not_false_iff]
exact hfb.2 (hBX.mem_of_insert_indep (Or.elim (hem.1 hfb.1) (False.elim ∘ hfb.2) id) hi).1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Batteries.Data.RBMap.Alter
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
/-!
# Additional lemmas for Red-black trees
-/
namespace Batteries
namespace RBNode
open RBColor
attribute [simp] fold foldl foldr Any forM foldlM Ordered
@[simp] theorem min?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.min? = t.max? := by
unfold RBNode.max?; split <;> simp [RBNode.min?]
unfold RBNode.min?; rw [min?.match_1.eq_3]
· apply min?_reverse
· simpa [reverse_eq_iff]
@[simp] theorem max?_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.max? = t.min? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, reverse_reverse]
@[simp] theorem mem_nil {x} : ¬x ∈ (.nil : RBNode α) := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
@[simp] theorem mem_node {y c a x b} :
y ∈ (.node c a x b : RBNode α) ↔ y = x ∨ y ∈ a ∨ y ∈ b := by simp [(·∈·), EMem]
theorem All_def {t : RBNode α} : t.All p ↔ ∀ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_imp, forall_and, *]
theorem Any_def {t : RBNode α} : t.Any p ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, p x := by
induction t <;> simp [or_and_right, exists_or, *]
theorem memP_def : MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_def : Mem cmp x t ↔ ∃ y ∈ t, cmp x y = .eq := Any_def
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (h : cmp x y = .eq) :
Mem cmp x t ↔ Mem cmp y t := by simp [Mem, TransCmp.cmp_congr_left' h]
theorem isOrdered_iff' [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t L R ↔
(∀ a ∈ L, t.All (cmpLT cmp a ·)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ R, t.All (cmpLT cmp · a)) ∧
(∀ a ∈ L, ∀ b ∈ R, cmpLT cmp a b) ∧
Ordered cmp t := by
induction t generalizing L R with
| nil =>
simp [isOrdered]; split <;> simp [cmpLT_iff]
next h => intro _ ha _ hb; cases h _ _ ha hb
| node _ l v r =>
simp [isOrdered, *]
exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨Ll, lv, Lv, ol⟩, ⟨vr, rR, vR, or⟩⟩ => ⟨
fun _ h => ⟨Lv _ h, Ll _ h, (Lv _ h).trans_l vr⟩,
fun _ h => ⟨vR _ h, (vR _ h).trans_r lv, rR _ h⟩,
fun _ hL _ hR => (Lv _ hL).trans (vR _ hR),
lv, vr, ol, or⟩,
fun ⟨hL, hR, _, lv, vr, ol, or⟩ => ⟨
⟨fun _ h => (hL _ h).2.1, lv, fun _ h => (hL _ h).1, ol⟩,
⟨vr, fun _ h => (hR _ h).2.2, fun _ h => (hR _ h).1, or⟩⟩⟩
theorem isOrdered_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
isOrdered cmp t ↔ Ordered cmp t := by simp [isOrdered_iff']
instance (cmp) [@TransCmp α cmp] (t) : Decidable (Ordered cmp t) := decidable_of_iff _ isOrdered_iff
/--
A cut is like a homomorphism of orderings: it is a monotonic predicate with respect to `cmp`,
but it can make things that are distinguished by `cmp` equal.
This is sufficient for `find?` to locate an element on which `cut` returns `.eq`,
but there may be other elements, not returned by `find?`, on which `cut` also returns `.eq`.
-/
class IsCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) : Prop where
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .lt}` is downward-closed. -/
le_lt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt
/-- The set `{x | cut x = .gt}` is upward-closed. -/
le_gt_trans [TransCmp cmp] : cmp x y ≠ .gt → cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt
theorem IsCut.lt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut x = .lt → cut y = .lt :=
IsCut.le_lt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.gt_trans [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp]
(H : cmp x y = .lt) : cut y = .gt → cut x = .gt :=
IsCut.le_gt_trans <| TransCmp.gt_asymm <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 H
theorem IsCut.congr [IsCut cmp cut] [TransCmp cmp] (H : cmp x y = .eq) : cut x = cut y := by
cases ey : cut y
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h) ey
· cases ex : cut x
· exact IsCut.le_lt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ex |>.symm.trans ey
· rfl
· refine IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) (fun h => ?_) ex |>.symm.trans ey
cases H.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 h
· exact IsCut.le_gt_trans (fun h => nomatch H.symm.trans h) ey
instance (cmp cut) [@IsCut α cmp cut] : IsCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_gt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
le_gt_trans h₁ h₂ := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [IsCut.le_lt_trans (cmp := cmp) h₁ (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h₂)]; rfl
/--
`IsStrictCut` upgrades the `IsCut` property to ensure that at most one element of the tree
can match the cut, and hence `find?` will return the unique such element if one exists.
-/
class IsStrictCut (cmp : α → α → Ordering) (cut : α → Ordering) extends IsCut cmp cut : Prop where
/-- If `cut = x`, then `cut` and `x` have compare the same with respect to other elements. -/
exact [TransCmp cmp] : cut x = .eq → cmp x y = cut y
/-- A "representable cut" is one generated by `cmp a` for some `a`. This is always a valid cut. -/
instance (cmp) (a : α) : IsStrictCut cmp (cmp a) where
le_lt_trans h₁ h₂ := TransCmp.lt_le_trans h₂ h₁
le_gt_trans h₁ := Decidable.not_imp_not.1 (TransCmp.le_trans · h₁)
exact h := (TransCmp.cmp_congr_left h).symm
instance (cmp cut) [@IsStrictCut α cmp cut] : IsStrictCut (flip cmp) (cut · |>.swap) where
exact h := by
have : TransCmp cmp := inferInstanceAs (TransCmp (flip (flip cmp)))
rw [← IsStrictCut.exact (cmp := cmp) (Ordering.swap_inj.1 h), OrientedCmp.symm]; rfl
section fold
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList
induction t generalizing l with
| nil => rfl
| node _ a _ b iha ihb => rw [foldr, foldr, iha, iha (_::_), ihb]; simp
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_node : (.node c a x b : RBNode α).toList = a.toList ++ x :: b.toList := by
rw [toList, foldr, foldr_cons]; rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_reverse (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.toList = t.toList.reverse := by
induction t <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem mem_toList {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.toList ↔ x ∈ t := by
induction t <;> simp [*, or_left_comm]
@[simp] theorem mem_reverse {t : RBNode α} : a ∈ t.reverse ↔ a ∈ t := by rw [← mem_toList]; simp
theorem min?_eq_toList_head? {t : RBNode α} : t.min? = t.toList.head? := by
induction t with
| nil => rfl
| node _ l _ _ ih =>
cases l <;> simp [RBNode.min?, ih]
next ll _ _ => cases toList ll <;> rfl
theorem max?_eq_toList_getLast? {t : RBNode α} : t.max? = t.toList.getLast? := by
rw [← min?_reverse, min?_eq_toList_head?]; simp
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldr f init = t.toList.foldr f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem foldl_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : β → α → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldl f init = t.foldr (flip f) init := by
simp (config := {unfoldPartialApp := true})
[foldr_eq_foldr_toList, foldl_eq_foldl_toList, flip]
theorem foldr_reverse {α β : Type _} {t : RBNode α} {f : α → β → β} {init : β} :
t.reverse.foldr f init = t.foldl (flip f) init :=
foldl_reverse.symm.trans (by simp; rfl)
theorem forM_eq_forM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.forM (m := m) f = t.toList.forM f := by induction t <;> simp [*]
theorem foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
t.foldlM (m := m) f init = t.toList.foldlM f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*]
theorem forIn_visit_eq_bindList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn.visit (m := m) f t init = (ForInStep.yield init).bindList f t.toList := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, forIn.visit]
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
end fold
namespace Stream
attribute [simp] foldl foldr
theorem foldr_cons (t : RBNode.Stream α) (l) : t.foldr (·::·) l = t.toList ++ l := by
unfold toList; apply Eq.symm; induction t <;> simp [*, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]
@[simp] theorem toList_nil : (.nil : RBNode.Stream α).toList = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem toList_cons :
(.cons x r s : RBNode.Stream α).toList = x :: r.toList ++ s.toList := by
rw [toList, toList, foldr, RBNode.foldr_cons]; rfl
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {s : RBNode.Stream α} : s.foldr f init = s.toList.foldr f init := by
induction s <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldr_eq_foldr_toList]
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBNode.Stream α} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init := by
induction t generalizing init <;> simp [*, RBNode.foldl_eq_foldl_toList]
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBNode α} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := by
conv => lhs; simp only [forIn, RBNode.forIn]
rw [List.forIn_eq_bindList, forIn_visit_eq_bindList]
end Stream
theorem toStream_toList' {t : RBNode α} {s} : (t.toStream s).toList = t.toList ++ s.toList := by
induction t generalizing s <;> simp [*, toStream]
@[simp] theorem toStream_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.toStream.toList = t.toList := by
simp [toStream_toList']
theorem Stream.next?_toList {s : RBNode.Stream α} :
(s.next?.map fun (a, b) => (a, b.toList)) = s.toList.next? := by
cases s <;> simp [next?, toStream_toList']
theorem ordered_iff {t : RBNode α} :
t.Ordered cmp ↔ t.toList.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) := by
induction t with
| nil => simp
| node c l v r ihl ihr =>
simp [*, List.pairwise_append, Ordered, All_def,
and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm, imp_and, forall_and]
exact fun _ _ hl hr a ha b hb => (hl _ ha).trans (hr _ hb)
theorem Ordered.toList_sorted {t : RBNode α} : t.Ordered cmp → t.toList.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) :=
ordered_iff.1
theorem min?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.min? = some a) : a ∈ t := by
rw [min?_eq_toList_head?] at h
rw [← mem_toList]
revert h; cases toList t <;> rintro ⟨⟩; constructor
theorem Ordered.min?_le {t : RBNode α} [TransCmp cmp] (ht : t.Ordered cmp) (h : t.min? = some a)
(x) (hx : x ∈ t) : cmp a x ≠ .gt := by
rw [min?_eq_toList_head?] at h
rw [← mem_toList] at hx
have := ht.toList_sorted
revert h hx this; cases toList t <;> rintro ⟨⟩ (_ | ⟨_, hx⟩) (_ | ⟨h1,h2⟩)
· rw [OrientedCmp.cmp_refl (cmp := cmp)]; decide
· rw [(h1 _ hx).1]; decide
theorem max?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.max? = some a) : a ∈ t := by
simpa using min?_mem ((min?_reverse _).trans h)
theorem Ordered.le_max? {t : RBNode α} [TransCmp cmp] (ht : t.Ordered cmp) (h : t.max? = some a)
(x) (hx : x ∈ t) : cmp x a ≠ .gt :=
ht.reverse.min?_le ((min?_reverse _).trans h) _ (by simpa using hx)
@[simp] theorem setBlack_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.setBlack.toList = t.toList := by
cases t <;> simp [setBlack]
@[simp] theorem setRed_toList {t : RBNode α} : t.setRed.toList = t.toList := by
cases t <;> simp [setRed]
@[simp] theorem balance1_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balance1 v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balance1; split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balance2_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balance2 v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balance2; split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balLeft_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balLeft v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balLeft; split <;> (try simp); split <;> simp
@[simp] theorem balRight_toList {l : RBNode α} {v r} :
(l.balRight v r).toList = l.toList ++ v :: r.toList := by
unfold balRight; split <;> (try simp); split <;> simp
theorem size_eq {t : RBNode α} : t.size = t.toList.length := by
induction t <;> simp [*, size]; rfl
@[simp] theorem reverse_size (t : RBNode α) : t.reverse.size = t.size := by simp [size_eq]
@[simp] theorem Any_reverse {t : RBNode α} : t.reverse.Any p ↔ t.Any p := by simp [Any_def]
@[simp] theorem memP_reverse {t : RBNode α} : MemP cut t.reverse ↔ MemP (cut · |>.swap) t := by
simp [MemP]; apply Iff.of_eq; congr; funext x; rw [← Ordering.swap_inj]; rfl
theorem Mem_reverse [@OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} :
Mem cmp x t.reverse ↔ Mem (flip cmp) x t := by
simp [Mem]; apply Iff.of_eq; congr; funext x; rw [OrientedCmp.symm]; rfl
section find?
theorem find?_some_eq_eq {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.find? cut → cut x = .eq := by
induction t <;> simp [find?]; split <;> try assumption
intro | rfl => assumption
theorem find?_some_mem {t : RBNode α} : x ∈ t.find? cut → x ∈ t := by
induction t <;> simp [find?]; split <;> simp (config := {contextual := true}) [*]
theorem find?_some_memP {t : RBNode α} (h : x ∈ t.find? cut) : MemP cut t :=
memP_def.2 ⟨_, find?_some_mem h, find?_some_eq_eq h⟩
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_find? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
MemP cut t ↔ ∃ x, t.find? cut = some x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => find?_some_memP h⟩
induction t with simp [find?] at H ⊢
| nil => cases H
| node _ l _ r ihl ihr =>
let ⟨lx, xr, hl, hr⟩ := ht
split
· next ev =>
refine ihl hl ?_
rcases H with ev' | hx | hx
· cases ev.symm.trans ev'
· exact hx
· have ⟨z, hz, ez⟩ := Any_def.1 hx
cases ez.symm.trans <| IsCut.lt_trans (All_def.1 xr _ hz).1 ev
· next ev =>
refine ihr hr ?_
rcases H with ev' | hx | hx
· cases ev.symm.trans ev'
· have ⟨z, hz, ez⟩ := Any_def.1 hx
cases ez.symm.trans <| IsCut.gt_trans (All_def.1 lx _ hz).1 ev
· exact hx
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem Ordered.unique [@TransCmp α cmp] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(hx : x ∈ t) (hy : y ∈ t) (e : cmp x y = .eq) : x = y := by
induction t with
| nil => cases hx
| node _ l _ r ihl ihr =>
let ⟨lx, xr, hl, hr⟩ := ht
rcases hx, hy with ⟨rfl | hx | hx, rfl | hy | hy⟩
· rfl
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 (All_def.1 lx _ hy).1
· cases e.symm.trans (All_def.1 xr _ hy).1
· cases e.symm.trans (All_def.1 lx _ hx).1
· exact ihl hl hx hy
· cases e.symm.trans ((All_def.1 lx _ hx).trans (All_def.1 xr _ hy)).1
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2 (All_def.1 xr _ hx).1
· cases e.symm.trans <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.2
((All_def.1 lx _ hy).trans (All_def.1 xr _ hx)).1
· exact ihr hr hx hy
theorem Ordered.find?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.find? cut = some x ↔ x ∈ t ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨find?_some_mem h, find?_some_eq_eq h⟩, fun ⟨hx, e⟩ => ?_⟩
have ⟨y, hy⟩ := ht.memP_iff_find?.1 (memP_def.2 ⟨_, hx, e⟩)
exact ht.unique hx (find?_some_mem hy) ((IsStrictCut.exact e).trans (find?_some_eq_eq hy)) ▸ hy
@[simp] theorem find?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut : α → Ordering) :
t.reverse.find? cut = t.find? (cut · |>.swap) := by
induction t <;> simp [*, find?]
cases cut _ <;> simp [Ordering.swap]
/--
Auxiliary definition for `zoom_ins`: set the root of the tree to `v`, creating a node if necessary.
-/
def setRoot (v : α) : RBNode α → RBNode α
| nil => node red nil v nil
| node c a _ b => node c a v b
/--
Auxiliary definition for `zoom_ins`: set the root of the tree to `v`, creating a node if necessary.
-/
def delRoot : RBNode α → RBNode α
| nil => nil
| node _ a _ b => a.append b
end find?
section «upperBound? and lowerBound?»
@[simp] theorem upperBound?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut ub) :
t.reverse.upperBound? cut ub = t.lowerBound? (cut · |>.swap) ub := by
induction t generalizing ub <;> simp [lowerBound?, upperBound?]
split <;> simp [*, Ordering.swap]
@[simp] theorem lowerBound?_reverse (t : RBNode α) (cut lb) :
t.reverse.lowerBound? cut lb = t.upperBound? (cut · |>.swap) lb := by
simpa using (upperBound?_reverse t.reverse (cut · |>.swap) lb).symm
theorem upperBound?_eq_find? {t : RBNode α} {cut} (ub) (H : t.find? cut = some x) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x := by
induction t generalizing ub with simp [find?] at H
| node c a y b iha ihb =>
simp [upperBound?]; split at H
· apply iha _ H
· apply ihb _ H
· exact H
theorem lowerBound?_eq_find? {t : RBNode α} {cut} (lb) (H : t.find? cut = some x) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t] at H ⊢; rw [lowerBound?_reverse]; rw [find?_reverse] at H
exact upperBound?_eq_find? _ H
/-- The value `x` returned by `upperBound?` is greater or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem upperBound?_ge' {t : RBNode α} (H : ∀ {x}, x ∈ ub → cut x ≠ .gt) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → cut x ≠ .gt := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => exact H
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· next hv => exact ihl fun | rfl, e => nomatch hv.symm.trans e
· exact ihr H
· next hv => intro | rfl, e => cases hv.symm.trans e
/-- The value `x` returned by `upperBound?` is greater or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem upperBound?_ge {t : RBNode α} : t.upperBound? cut = some x → cut x ≠ .gt :=
upperBound?_ge' nofun
/-- The value `x` returned by `lowerBound?` is less or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem lowerBound?_le' {t : RBNode α} (H : ∀ {x}, x ∈ lb → cut x ≠ .lt) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → cut x ≠ .lt := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse, Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj]
exact upperBound?_ge' fun h => by specialize H h; rwa [Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj] at H
/-- The value `x` returned by `lowerBound?` is less or equal to the `cut`. -/
theorem lowerBound?_le {t : RBNode α} : t.lowerBound? cut = some x → cut x ≠ .lt :=
lowerBound?_le' nofun
theorem All.upperBound?_ub {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) (H : ∀ {x}, ub = some x → p x) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → p x := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => exact H
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· exact ihl hp.2.1 fun | rfl => hp.1
· exact ihr hp.2.2 H
· exact fun | rfl => hp.1
theorem All.upperBound? {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) : t.upperBound? cut = some x → p x :=
hp.upperBound?_ub nofun
theorem All.lowerBound?_lb {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) (H : ∀ {x}, lb = some x → p x) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → p x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]
exact All.upperBound?_ub (All.reverse.2 hp) H
theorem All.lowerBound? {t : RBNode α} (hp : t.All p) : t.lowerBound? cut = some x → p x :=
hp.lowerBound?_lb nofun
theorem upperBound?_mem_ub {t : RBNode α}
(h : t.upperBound? cut ub = some x) : x ∈ t ∨ ub = some x :=
All.upperBound?_ub (p := fun x => x ∈ t ∨ ub = some x) (All_def.2 fun _ => .inl) Or.inr h
theorem upperBound?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.upperBound? cut = some x) : x ∈ t :=
(upperBound?_mem_ub h).resolve_right nofun
theorem lowerBound?_mem_lb {t : RBNode α}
(h : t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x) : x ∈ t ∨ lb = some x :=
All.lowerBound?_lb (p := fun x => x ∈ t ∨ lb = some x) (All_def.2 fun _ => .inl) Or.inr h
theorem lowerBound?_mem {t : RBNode α} (h : t.lowerBound? cut = some x) : x ∈ t :=
(lowerBound?_mem_lb h).resolve_right nofun
theorem upperBound?_of_some {t : RBNode α} : ∃ x, t.upperBound? cut (some y) = some x := by
induction t generalizing y <;> simp [upperBound?]; split <;> simp [*]
theorem lowerBound?_of_some {t : RBNode α} : ∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut (some y) = some x := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]; exact upperBound?_of_some
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_exists [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t) :
(∃ x, t.upperBound? cut = some x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x ≠ .gt := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨_, upperBound?_mem hx, upperBound?_ge hx⟩, fun H => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx, e⟩ := H
induction t generalizing x with
| nil => cases hx
| node _ _ _ _ _ ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split
· exact upperBound?_of_some
· rcases hx with rfl | hx | hx
· contradiction
· next hv => cases e <| IsCut.gt_trans (All_def.1 h.1 _ hx).1 hv
· exact ihr h.2.2.2 _ hx e
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_exists [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t) :
(∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut = some x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, cut x ≠ .lt := by
conv => enter [2, 1, x]; rw [Ne, ← Ordering.swap_inj]
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse]
simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using h.reverse.upperBound?_exists (cut := (cut · |>.swap))
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_least_ub [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t)
(hub : ∀ {x}, ub = some x → t.All (cmpLT cmp · x)) :
t.upperBound? cut ub = some x → y ∈ t → cut x = .lt → cmp y x = .lt → cut y = .gt := by
induction t generalizing ub with
| nil => nofun
| node _ _ _ _ ihl ihr =>
simp [upperBound?]; split <;> rename_i hv <;> rintro h₁ (rfl | hy' | hy') hx h₂
· rcases upperBound?_mem_ub h₁ with h₁ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ (All_def.1 h.1 _ h₁).1
· cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ h₂
· exact ihl h.2.2.1 (by rintro _ ⟨⟨⟩⟩; exact h.1) h₁ hy' hx h₂
· refine (TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ ?_).elim; have := (All_def.1 h.2.1 _ hy').1
rcases upperBound?_mem_ub h₁ with h₁ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩
· exact TransCmp.lt_trans (All_def.1 h.1 _ h₁).1 this
· exact this
· exact hv
· exact IsCut.gt_trans (cut := cut) (cmp := cmp) (All_def.1 h.1 _ hy').1 hv
· exact ihr h.2.2.2 (fun h => (hub h).2.2) h₁ hy' hx h₂
· cases h₁; cases TransCmp.lt_asymm h₂ h₂
· cases h₁; cases hx.symm.trans hv
· cases h₁; cases hx.symm.trans hv
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_greatest_lb [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (h : Ordered cmp t)
(hlb : ∀ {x}, lb = some x → t.All (cmpLT cmp x ·)) :
t.lowerBound? cut lb = some x → y ∈ t → cut x = .gt → cmp x y = .lt → cut y = .lt := by
intro h1 h2 h3 h4
rw [← reverse_reverse t, lowerBound?_reverse] at h1
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj] at h3 ⊢
revert h2 h3 h4
simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using
h.reverse.upperBound?_least_ub (fun h => All.reverse.2 <| (hlb h).imp .flip) h1
/--
A statement of the least-ness of the result of `upperBound?`. If `x` is the return value of
`upperBound?` and it is strictly greater than the cut, then any other `y < x` in the tree is in fact
strictly less than the cut (so there is no exact match, and nothing closer to the cut).
-/
theorem Ordered.upperBound?_least [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.upperBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t)
(xy : cmp y x = .lt) (hx : cut x = .lt) : cut y = .gt :=
ht.upperBound?_least_ub (by nofun) H hy hx xy
/--
A statement of the greatest-ness of the result of `lowerBound?`. If `x` is the return value of
`lowerBound?` and it is strictly less than the cut, then any other `y > x` in the tree is in fact
strictly greater than the cut (so there is no exact match, and nothing closer to the cut).
-/
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_greatest [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.lowerBound? cut none = some x) (hy : y ∈ t)
(xy : cmp x y = .lt) (hx : cut x = .gt) : cut y = .lt :=
ht.lowerBound?_greatest_lb (by nofun) H hy hx xy
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_upperBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.MemP cut ↔ ∃ x, t.upperBound? cut = some x ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine memP_def.trans ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, ey⟩ => ?_, fun ⟨x, hx, e⟩ => ⟨_, upperBound?_mem hx, e⟩⟩
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht.upperBound?_exists.2 ⟨_, hy, fun h => nomatch ey.symm.trans h⟩
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩; cases ex : cut x
· cases e : cmp x y
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.lt_trans e ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.congr e |>.symm.trans ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| ht.upperBound?_least hx hy (OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 e) ex
· rfl
· cases upperBound?_ge hx ex
theorem Ordered.memP_iff_lowerBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t) :
t.MemP cut ↔ ∃ x, t.lowerBound? cut = some x ∧ cut x = .eq := by
refine memP_def.trans ⟨fun ⟨y, hy, ey⟩ => ?_, fun ⟨x, hx, e⟩ => ⟨_, lowerBound?_mem hx, e⟩⟩
have ⟨x, hx⟩ := ht.lowerBound?_exists.2 ⟨_, hy, fun h => nomatch ey.symm.trans h⟩
refine ⟨x, hx, ?_⟩; cases ex : cut x
· cases lowerBound?_le hx ex
· rfl
· cases e : cmp x y
· cases ey.symm.trans <| ht.lowerBound?_greatest hx hy e ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.congr e |>.symm.trans ex
· cases ey.symm.trans <| IsCut.gt_trans (OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 e) ex
/-- A stronger version of `lowerBound?_greatest` that holds when the cut is strict. -/
theorem Ordered.lowerBound?_lt [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.lowerBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t) : cmp x y = .lt ↔ cut y = .lt := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_gt.1 ?_⟩
· cases e : cut x
· cases lowerBound?_le H e
· exact IsStrictCut.exact e |>.symm.trans h
· exact ht.lowerBound?_greatest H hy h e
· by_contra h'; exact lowerBound?_le H <| IsCut.le_lt_trans (cmp := cmp) (cut := cut) h' h
/-- A stronger version of `upperBound?_least` that holds when the cut is strict. -/
theorem Ordered.lt_upperBound? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] (ht : Ordered cmp t)
(H : t.upperBound? cut = some x) (hy : y ∈ t) : cmp y x = .lt ↔ cut y = .gt := by
rw [← reverse_reverse t, upperBound?_reverse] at H
rw [← Ordering.swap_inj (o₂ := .gt)]
revert hy; simpa [-Ordering.swap_inj] using ht.reverse.lowerBound?_lt H
end «upperBound? and lowerBound?»
namespace Path
attribute [simp] RootOrdered Ordered
/-- The list of elements to the left of the hole.
(This function is intended for specification purposes only.) -/
@[simp] def listL : Path α → List α
| .root => []
| .left _ parent _ _ => parent.listL
| .right _ l v parent => parent.listL ++ (l.toList ++ [v])
/-- The list of elements to the right of the hole.
(This function is intended for specification purposes only.) -/
@[simp] def listR : Path α → List α
| .root => []
| .left _ parent v r => v :: r.toList ++ parent.listR
| .right _ _ _ parent => parent.listR
/-- Wraps a list of elements with the left and right elements of the path. -/
abbrev withList (p : Path α) (l : List α) : List α := p.listL ++ l ++ p.listR
theorem rootOrdered_iff {p : Path α} (hp : p.Ordered cmp) :
p.RootOrdered cmp v ↔ (∀ a ∈ p.listL, cmpLT cmp a v) ∧ (∀ a ∈ p.listR, cmpLT cmp v a) := by
induction p with
(simp [All_def] at hp; simp [*, and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm, or_imp, forall_and])
| left _ _ x _ ih => exact fun vx _ _ _ ha => vx.trans (hp.2.1 _ ha)
| right _ _ x _ ih => exact fun xv _ _ _ ha => (hp.2.1 _ ha).trans xv
theorem ordered_iff {p : Path α} :
p.Ordered cmp ↔ p.listL.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) ∧ p.listR.Pairwise (cmpLT cmp) ∧
∀ x ∈ p.listL, ∀ y ∈ p.listR, cmpLT cmp x y := by
induction p with
| root => simp
| left _ _ x _ ih | right _ _ x _ ih => ?_
all_goals
rw [Ordered, and_congr_right_eq fun h => by simp [All_def, rootOrdered_iff h]; rfl]
simp [List.pairwise_append, or_imp, forall_and, ih, RBNode.ordered_iff]
-- FIXME: simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm, and_comm] is really slow here
· exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, xr, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨rL, rR⟩, hr⟩ =>
⟨hL, ⟨⟨xr, xR⟩, hr, hR, rR⟩, Lx, fun _ ha _ hb => rL _ hb _ ha, LR⟩,
fun ⟨hL, ⟨⟨xr, xR⟩, hr, hR, rR⟩, Lx, Lr, LR⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, xr, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨fun _ ha _ hb => Lr _ hb _ ha, rR⟩, hr⟩⟩
· exact ⟨
fun ⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, lx, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨lL, lR⟩, hl⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, ⟨hl, lx⟩, fun _ ha _ hb => lL _ hb _ ha, Lx⟩, hR, LR, lR, xR⟩,
fun ⟨⟨hL, ⟨hl, lx⟩, Ll, Lx⟩, hR, LR, lR, xR⟩ =>
⟨⟨hL, hR, LR⟩, lx, ⟨Lx, xR⟩, ⟨fun _ ha _ hb => Ll _ hb _ ha, lR⟩, hl⟩⟩
theorem zoom_zoomed₁ (e : zoom cut t path = (t', path')) : t'.OnRoot (cut · = .eq) :=
match t, e with
| nil, rfl => trivial
| node .., e => by
revert e; unfold zoom; split
· exact zoom_zoomed₁
· exact zoom_zoomed₁
· next H => intro e; cases e; exact H
@[simp] theorem fill_toList {p : Path α} : (p.fill t).toList = p.withList t.toList := by
induction p generalizing t <;> simp [*]
theorem _root_.Batteries.RBNode.zoom_toList {t : RBNode α} (eq : t.zoom cut = (t', p')) :
p'.withList t'.toList = t.toList := by rw [← fill_toList, ← zoom_fill eq]; rfl
@[simp] theorem ins_toList {p : Path α} : (p.ins t).toList = p.withList t.toList := by
match p with
| .root | .left red .. | .right red .. | .left black .. | .right black .. =>
simp [ins, ins_toList]
@[simp] theorem insertNew_toList {p : Path α} : (p.insertNew v).toList = p.withList [v] := by
simp [insertNew]
theorem insert_toList {p : Path α} :
(p.insert t v).toList = p.withList (t.setRoot v).toList := by
simp [insert]; split <;> simp [setRoot]
protected theorem Balanced.insert {path : Path α} (hp : path.Balanced c₀ n₀ c n) :
t.Balanced c n → ∃ c n, (path.insert t v).Balanced c n
| .nil => ⟨_, hp.insertNew⟩
| .red ha hb => ⟨_, _, hp.fill (.red ha hb)⟩
| .black ha hb => ⟨_, _, hp.fill (.black ha hb)⟩
theorem Ordered.insert : ∀ {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α},
path.Ordered cmp → t.Ordered cmp → t.All (path.RootOrdered cmp) → path.RootOrdered cmp v →
t.OnRoot (cmpEq cmp v) → (path.insert t v).Ordered cmp
| _, nil, hp, _, _, vp, _ => hp.insertNew vp
| _, node .., hp, ⟨ax, xb, ha, hb⟩, ⟨_, ap, bp⟩, vp, xv => Ordered.fill.2
⟨hp, ⟨ax.imp xv.lt_congr_right.2, xb.imp xv.lt_congr_left.2, ha, hb⟩, vp, ap, bp⟩
theorem Ordered.erase : ∀ {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α},
path.Ordered cmp → t.Ordered cmp → t.All (path.RootOrdered cmp) → (path.erase t).Ordered cmp
| _, nil, hp, ht, tp => Ordered.fill.2 ⟨hp, ht, tp⟩
| _, node .., hp, ⟨ax, xb, ha, hb⟩, ⟨_, ap, bp⟩ => hp.del (ha.append ax xb hb) (ap.append bp)
theorem zoom_ins {t : RBNode α} {cmp : α → α → Ordering} :
t.zoom (cmp v) path = (t', path') →
path.ins (t.ins cmp v) = path'.ins (t'.setRoot v) := by
unfold RBNode.ins; split <;> simp [zoom]
· intro | rfl, rfl => rfl
all_goals
· split
· exact zoom_ins
· exact zoom_ins
· intro | rfl => rfl
theorem insertNew_eq_insert (h : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, path)) :
path.insertNew v = (t.insert cmp v).setBlack :=
insert_setBlack .. ▸ (zoom_ins h).symm
theorem ins_eq_fill {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α} :
path.Balanced c₀ n₀ c n → t.Balanced c n → path.ins t = (path.fill t).setBlack
| .root, h => rfl
| .redL hb H, ha | .redR ha H, hb => by unfold ins; exact ins_eq_fill H (.red ha hb)
| .blackL hb H, ha => by rw [ins, fill, ← ins_eq_fill H (.black ha hb), balance1_eq ha]
| .blackR ha H, hb => by rw [ins, fill, ← ins_eq_fill H (.black ha hb), balance2_eq hb]
theorem zoom_insert {path : Path α} {t : RBNode α} (ht : t.Balanced c n)
(H : zoom (cmp v) t = (t', path)) :
(path.insert t' v).setBlack = (t.insert cmp v).setBlack := by
have ⟨_, _, ht', hp'⟩ := ht.zoom .root H
cases ht' with simp [insert]
| nil => simp [insertNew_eq_insert H, setBlack_idem]
| red hl hr => rw [← ins_eq_fill hp' (.red hl hr), insert_setBlack]; exact (zoom_ins H).symm
| black hl hr => rw [← ins_eq_fill hp' (.black hl hr), insert_setBlack]; exact (zoom_ins H).symm
theorem zoom_del {t : RBNode α} :
t.zoom cut path = (t', path') →
path.del (t.del cut) (match t with | node c .. => c | _ => red) =
path'.del t'.delRoot (match t' with | node c .. => c | _ => red) := by
unfold RBNode.del; split <;> simp [zoom]
· intro | rfl, rfl => rfl
· next c a y b =>
split
· have IH := @zoom_del (t := a)
match a with
| nil => intro | rfl => rfl
| node black .. | node red .. => apply IH
· have IH := @zoom_del (t := b)
match b with
| nil => intro | rfl => rfl
| node black .. | node red .. => apply IH
· intro | rfl => rfl
/-- Asserts that `p` holds on all elements to the left of the hole. -/
def AllL (p : α → Prop) : Path α → Prop
| .root => True
| .left _ parent _ _ => parent.AllL p
| .right _ a x parent => a.All p ∧ p x ∧ parent.AllL p
/-- Asserts that `p` holds on all elements to the right of the hole. -/
def AllR (p : α → Prop) : Path α → Prop
| .root => True
| .left _ parent x b => parent.AllR p ∧ p x ∧ b.All p
| .right _ _ _ parent => parent.AllR p
end Path
theorem insert_toList_zoom {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (t', p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList (t'.setRoot v).toList := by
rw [← setBlack_toList, ← Path.zoom_insert ht e, setBlack_toList, Path.insert_toList]
theorem insert_toList_zoom_nil {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList [v] := insert_toList_zoom ht e
theorem exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (nil, p)) :
∃ L R, t.toList = L ++ R ∧ (t.insert cmp v).toList = L ++ v :: R :=
⟨p.listL, p.listR, by simp [← zoom_toList e, insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e]⟩
theorem insert_toList_zoom_node {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (node c' l v' r, p)) :
(t.insert cmp v).toList = p.withList (node c l v r).toList := insert_toList_zoom ht e
theorem exists_insert_toList_zoom_node {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n)
(e : zoom (cmp v) t = (node c' l v' r, p)) :
∃ L R, t.toList = L ++ v' :: R ∧ (t.insert cmp v).toList = L ++ v :: R := by
refine ⟨p.listL ++ l.toList, r.toList ++ p.listR, ?_⟩
simp [← zoom_toList e, insert_toList_zoom_node ht e]
theorem mem_insert_self {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) : v ∈ t.insert cmp v := by
rw [← mem_toList, List.mem_iff_append]
exact match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) => let ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e; ⟨_, _, h⟩
| (node .., p) => let ⟨_, _, _, h⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e; ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (h : v' ∈ t) :
v' ∈ t.insert cmp v ∨ cmp v v' = .eq := by
match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₁] at h
simp [← mem_toList, h₂]; cases h <;> simp [*]
| (node .., p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₁] at h
simp [← mem_toList, h₂]; rcases h with h|h|h <;> simp [*]
exact .inr (Path.zoom_zoomed₁ e)
theorem exists_find?_insert_self [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut]
{t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) (hv : cut v = .eq) :
∃ x, (t.insert cmp v).find? cut = some x :=
ht₂.insert.memP_iff_find?.1 <| memP_def.2 ⟨_, mem_insert_self ht, hv⟩
theorem find?_insert_self [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut]
{t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) (hv : cut v = .eq) :
(t.insert cmp v).find? cut = some v :=
ht₂.insert.find?_some.2 ⟨mem_insert_self ht, hv⟩
theorem mem_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBNode α} (ht : Balanced t c n) (ht₂ : Ordered cmp t) :
v' ∈ t.insert cmp v ↔ (v' ∈ t ∧ t.find? (cmp v) ≠ some v') ∨ v' = v := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun | .inl ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ?_ | .inr h => ?_⟩
· match e : zoom (cmp v) t with
| (nil, p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_nil ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₂] at h; rw [← or_assoc, or_right_comm] at h
refine h.imp_left fun h => ?_
simp [← mem_toList, h₁, h]
rw [find?_eq_zoom, e]; nofun
| (node .., p) =>
let ⟨_, _, h₁, h₂⟩ := exists_insert_toList_zoom_node ht e
simp [← mem_toList, h₂] at h; simp [← mem_toList, h₁]; rw [or_left_comm] at h ⊢
rcases h with _|h <;> simp [*]
refine .inl fun h => ?_
rw [find?_eq_zoom, e] at h; cases h
suffices cmpLT cmp v' v' by cases OrientedCmp.cmp_refl.symm.trans this.1
have := ht₂.toList_sorted; simp [h₁, List.pairwise_append] at this
exact h.elim (this.2.2 _ · |>.1) (this.2.1.1 _)
· exact (mem_insert_of_mem ht h₁).resolve_right fun h' => h₂ <| ht₂.find?_some.2 ⟨h₁, h'⟩
· exact h ▸ mem_insert_self ht
end RBNode
open RBNode (IsCut IsStrictCut)
namespace RBSet
@[simp] theorem val_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.1.toList = t.toList := rfl
@[simp] theorem mkRBSet_eq : mkRBSet α cmp = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_eq : @RBSet.empty α cmp = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem default_eq : (default : RBSet α cmp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem empty_toList : toList (∅ : RBSet α cmp) = [] := rfl
@[simp] theorem single_toList : toList (single a : RBSet α cmp) = [a] := rfl
theorem mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : x ∈ toList t ↔ x ∈ t.1 := RBNode.mem_toList
theorem mem_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : cmp x y = .eq) : x ∈ t ↔ y ∈ t :=
RBNode.mem_congr h
theorem mem_iff_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : x ∈ t ↔ ∃ y ∈ toList t, cmp x y = .eq :=
RBNode.mem_def.trans <| by simp [mem_toList]
theorem mem_of_mem_toList [@OrientedCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : x ∈ toList t) : x ∈ t :=
mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, h, OrientedCmp.cmp_refl⟩
theorem foldl_eq_foldl_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.foldl f init = t.toList.foldl f init :=
RBNode.foldl_eq_foldl_toList
theorem foldr_eq_foldr_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.foldr f init = t.toList.foldr f init :=
RBNode.foldr_eq_foldr_toList
theorem foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.foldlM (m := m) f init = t.toList.foldlM f init := RBNode.foldlM_eq_foldlM_toList
theorem forM_eq_forM_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.forM (m := m) f = t.toList.forM f := RBNode.forM_eq_forM_toList
theorem forIn_eq_forIn_toList [Monad m] [LawfulMonad m] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
forIn (m := m) t init f = forIn t.toList init f := RBNode.forIn_eq_forIn_toList
theorem toStream_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : toStream t = t.1.toStream .nil := rfl
@[simp] theorem toStream_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} : (toStream t).toList = t.toList := by
simp [toStream_eq]
theorem isEmpty_iff_toList_eq_nil {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.isEmpty ↔ t.toList = [] := by obtain ⟨⟨⟩, _⟩ := t <;> simp [toList, isEmpty]
theorem toList_sorted {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.toList.Pairwise (RBNode.cmpLT cmp) :=
t.2.out.1.toList_sorted
theorem findP?_some_eq_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.findP? cut = some y → cut y = .eq :=
RBNode.find?_some_eq_eq
theorem find?_some_eq_eq {t : RBSet α cmp} : t.find? x = some y → cmp x y = .eq :=
findP?_some_eq_eq
theorem findP?_some_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.findP? cut = some y) : y ∈ toList t :=
mem_toList.2 <| RBNode.find?_some_mem h
theorem find?_some_mem_toList {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.find? x = some y) : y ∈ toList t :=
findP?_some_mem_toList h
theorem findP?_some_memP {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.findP? cut = some y) : t.MemP cut :=
RBNode.find?_some_memP h
theorem find?_some_mem {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : t.find? x = some y) : x ∈ t :=
findP?_some_memP h
theorem mem_toList_unique [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp}
(hx : x ∈ toList t) (hy : y ∈ toList t) (e : cmp x y = .eq) : x = y :=
t.2.out.1.unique (mem_toList.1 hx) (mem_toList.1 hy) e
theorem findP?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.findP? cut = some y ↔ y ∈ toList t ∧ cut y = .eq :=
t.2.out.1.find?_some.trans <| by simp [mem_toList]
theorem find?_some [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.find? x = some y ↔ y ∈ toList t ∧ cmp x y = .eq := findP?_some
theorem memP_iff_findP? [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsCut cmp cut] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
MemP cut t ↔ ∃ y, t.findP? cut = some y := t.2.out.1.memP_iff_find?
theorem mem_iff_find? [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
x ∈ t ↔ ∃ y, t.find? x = some y := memP_iff_findP?
@[simp] theorem contains_iff [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
t.contains x ↔ x ∈ t := Option.isSome_iff_exists.trans mem_iff_find?.symm
instance [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} : Decidable (x ∈ t) := decidable_of_iff _ contains_iff
theorem size_eq (t : RBSet α cmp) : t.size = t.toList.length := RBNode.size_eq
theorem mem_toList_insert_self (v) (t : RBSet α cmp) : v ∈ toList (t.insert v) :=
let ⟨_, _, h⟩ := t.2.out.2; mem_toList.2 (RBNode.mem_insert_self h)
theorem mem_insert_self [@OrientedCmp α cmp] (v) (t : RBSet α cmp) : v ∈ t.insert v :=
mem_of_mem_toList <| mem_toList_insert_self v t
theorem mem_insert_of_eq [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cmp v v' = .eq) :
v' ∈ t.insert v := (mem_congr h).1 (mem_insert_self ..)
theorem mem_toList_insert_of_mem (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ toList t) :
v' ∈ toList (t.insert v) ∨ cmp v v' = .eq :=
let ⟨_, _, ht⟩ := t.2.out.2
.imp_left mem_toList.2 <| RBNode.mem_insert_of_mem ht <| mem_toList.1 h
theorem mem_insert_of_mem_toList [@OrientedCmp α cmp] (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ toList t) :
v' ∈ t.insert v :=
match mem_toList_insert_of_mem v h with
| .inl h' => mem_of_mem_toList h'
| .inr h' => mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, mem_toList_insert_self .., OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_eq_symm.1 h'⟩
theorem mem_insert_of_mem [@TransCmp α cmp] (v) {t : RBSet α cmp} (h : v' ∈ t) : v' ∈ t.insert v :=
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_iff_mem_toList.1 h
(mem_congr h₂).2 (mem_insert_of_mem_toList v h₁)
theorem mem_toList_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
v' ∈ toList (t.insert v) ↔ (v' ∈ toList t ∧ t.find? v ≠ some v') ∨ v' = v := by
let ⟨ht₁, _, _, ht₂⟩ := t.2.out
simpa [mem_toList] using RBNode.mem_insert ht₂ ht₁
theorem mem_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] {t : RBSet α cmp} :
v' ∈ t.insert v ↔ v' ∈ t ∨ cmp v v' = .eq := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun | .inl h => mem_insert_of_mem _ h | .inr h => mem_insert_of_eq _ h⟩
let ⟨_, h₁, h₂⟩ := mem_iff_mem_toList.1 h
match mem_toList_insert.1 h₁ with
| .inl ⟨h₃, _⟩ => exact .inl <| mem_iff_mem_toList.2 ⟨_, h₃, h₂⟩
| .inr rfl => exact .inr <| OrientedCmp.cmp_eq_eq_symm.1 h₂
theorem find?_congr [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cmp v₁ v₂ = .eq) :
t.find? v₁ = t.find? v₂ := by simp [find?, TransCmp.cmp_congr_left' h]
theorem findP?_insert_of_eq [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut]
(t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cut v = .eq) : (t.insert v).findP? cut = some v :=
findP?_some.2 ⟨mem_toList_insert_self .., h⟩
theorem find?_insert_of_eq [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cmp v' v = .eq) :
(t.insert v).find? v' = some v := findP?_insert_of_eq t h
theorem findP?_insert_of_ne [@TransCmp α cmp] [IsStrictCut cmp cut]
(t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cut v ≠ .eq) : (t.insert v).findP? cut = t.findP? cut := by
refine Option.ext fun u =>
findP?_some.trans <| .trans (and_congr_left fun h' => ?_) findP?_some.symm
rw [mem_toList_insert, or_iff_left, and_iff_left]
· exact mt (fun h => by rwa [IsCut.congr (cut := cut) (find?_some_eq_eq h)]) h
· rintro rfl; contradiction
theorem find?_insert_of_ne [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (h : cmp v' v ≠ .eq) :
(t.insert v).find? v' = t.find? v' := findP?_insert_of_ne t h
| .lake/packages/batteries/Batteries/Data/RBMap/Lemmas.lean | 969 | 971 | theorem findP?_insert [@TransCmp α cmp] (t : RBSet α cmp) (v cut) [IsStrictCut cmp cut] :
(t.insert v).findP? cut = if cut v = .eq then some v else t.findP? cut := by |
split <;> [exact findP?_insert_of_eq t ‹_›; exact findP?_insert_of_ne t ‹_›]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.ProjIcc
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.UnitInterval
#align_import topology.path_connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Path connectedness
## Main definitions
In the file the unit interval `[0, 1]` in `ℝ` is denoted by `I`, and `X` is a topological space.
* `Path (x y : X)` is the type of paths from `x` to `y`, i.e., continuous maps from `I` to `X`
mapping `0` to `x` and `1` to `y`.
* `Path.map` is the image of a path under a continuous map.
* `Joined (x y : X)` means there is a path between `x` and `y`.
* `Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y)` selects some path between two points `x` and `y`.
* `pathComponent (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x`.
* `PathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is non-empty and every two
points of `X` are joined.
Then there are corresponding relative notions for `F : Set X`.
* `JoinedIn F (x y : X)` means there is a path `γ` joining `x` to `y` with values in `F`.
* `JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y)` selects a path from `x` to `y` inside `F`.
* `pathComponentIn F (x : X)` is the set of points joined to `x` in `F`.
* `IsPathConnected F` asserts that `F` is non-empty and every two
points of `F` are joined in `F`.
* `LocPathConnectedSpace X` is a predicate class asserting that `X` is locally path-connected:
each point has a basis of path-connected neighborhoods (we do *not* ask these to be open).
## Main theorems
* `Joined` and `JoinedIn F` are transitive relations.
One can link the absolute and relative version in two directions, using `(univ : Set X)` or the
subtype `↥F`.
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X)`
* `isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace ↥F`
For locally path connected spaces, we have
* `pathConnectedSpace_iff_connectedSpace : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ ConnectedSpace X`
* `IsOpen.isConnected_iff_isPathConnected (U_op : IsOpen U) : IsPathConnected U ↔ IsConnected U`
## Implementation notes
By default, all paths have `I` as their source and `X` as their target, but there is an
operation `Set.IccExtend` that will extend any continuous map `γ : I → X` into a continuous map
`IccExtend zero_le_one γ : ℝ → X` that is constant before `0` and after `1`.
This is used to define `Path.extend` that turns `γ : Path x y` into a continuous map
`γ.extend : ℝ → X` whose restriction to `I` is the original `γ`, and is equal to `x`
on `(-∞, 0]` and to `y` on `[1, +∞)`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter unitInterval Set Function
variable {X Y : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {x y z : X} {ι : Type*}
/-! ### Paths -/
/-- Continuous path connecting two points `x` and `y` in a topological space -/
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure Path (x y : X) extends C(I, X) where
/-- The start point of a `Path`. -/
source' : toFun 0 = x
/-- The end point of a `Path`. -/
target' : toFun 1 = y
#align path Path
instance Path.funLike : FunLike (Path x y) I X where
coe := fun γ ↦ ⇑γ.toContinuousMap
coe_injective' := fun γ₁ γ₂ h => by
simp only [DFunLike.coe_fn_eq] at h
cases γ₁; cases γ₂; congr
-- Porting note (#10754): added this instance so that we can use `FunLike.coe` for `CoeFun`
-- this also fixed very strange `simp` timeout issues
instance Path.continuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass (Path x y) I X where
map_continuous := fun γ => show Continuous γ.toContinuousMap by continuity
-- Porting note: not necessary in light of the instance above
/-
instance : CoeFun (Path x y) fun _ => I → X :=
⟨fun p => p.toFun⟩
-/
@[ext]
protected theorem Path.ext : ∀ {γ₁ γ₂ : Path x y}, (γ₁ : I → X) = γ₂ → γ₁ = γ₂ := by
rintro ⟨⟨x, h11⟩, h12, h13⟩ ⟨⟨x, h21⟩, h22, h23⟩ rfl
rfl
#align path.ext Path.ext
namespace Path
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk_mk (f : I → X) (h₁) (h₂ : f 0 = x) (h₃ : f 1 = y) :
⇑(mk ⟨f, h₁⟩ h₂ h₃ : Path x y) = f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_mk Path.coe_mk_mk
-- Porting note: the name `Path.coe_mk` better refers to a new lemma below
variable (γ : Path x y)
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous γ :=
γ.continuous_toFun
#align path.continuous Path.continuous
@[simp]
protected theorem source : γ 0 = x :=
γ.source'
#align path.source Path.source
@[simp]
protected theorem target : γ 1 = y :=
γ.target'
#align path.target Path.target
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def simps.apply : I → X :=
γ
#align path.simps.apply Path.simps.apply
initialize_simps_projections Path (toFun → simps.apply, -toContinuousMap)
@[simp]
theorem coe_toContinuousMap : ⇑γ.toContinuousMap = γ :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_continuous_map Path.coe_toContinuousMap
-- Porting note: this is needed because of the `Path.continuousMapClass` instance
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk : ⇑(γ : C(I, X)) = γ :=
rfl
/-- Any function `φ : Π (a : α), Path (x a) (y a)` can be seen as a function `α × I → X`. -/
instance hasUncurryPath {X α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {x y : α → X} :
HasUncurry (∀ a : α, Path (x a) (y a)) (α × I) X :=
⟨fun φ p => φ p.1 p.2⟩
#align path.has_uncurry_path Path.hasUncurryPath
/-- The constant path from a point to itself -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (x : X) : Path x x where
toFun _t := x
continuous_toFun := continuous_const
source' := rfl
target' := rfl
#align path.refl Path.refl
@[simp]
theorem refl_range {a : X} : range (Path.refl a) = {a} := by simp [Path.refl, CoeFun.coe]
#align path.refl_range Path.refl_range
/-- The reverse of a path from `x` to `y`, as a path from `y` to `x` -/
@[symm, simps]
def symm (γ : Path x y) : Path y x where
toFun := γ ∘ σ
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simpa [-Path.target] using γ.target
target' := by simpa [-Path.source] using γ.source
#align path.symm Path.symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm (γ : Path x y) : γ.symm.symm = γ := by
ext t
show γ (σ (σ t)) = γ t
rw [unitInterval.symm_symm]
#align path.symm_symm Path.symm_symm
theorem symm_bijective : Function.Bijective (Path.symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm, symm_symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm {a : X} : (Path.refl a).symm = Path.refl a := by
ext
rfl
#align path.refl_symm Path.refl_symm
@[simp]
theorem symm_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) : range γ.symm = range γ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_range, Path.symm, DFunLike.coe, unitInterval.symm, SetCoe.exists, comp_apply,
Subtype.coe_mk]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩ <;> refine ⟨1 - y, mem_iff_one_sub_mem.mp hy, ?_⟩ <;>
convert hxy
simp
#align path.symm_range Path.symm_range
/-! #### Space of paths -/
open ContinuousMap
/- porting note: because of the `DFunLike` instance, we already have a coercion to `C(I, X)`
so we avoid adding another.
--instance : Coe (Path x y) C(I, X) :=
--⟨fun γ => γ.1⟩
-/
/-- The following instance defines the topology on the path space to be induced from the
compact-open topology on the space `C(I,X)` of continuous maps from `I` to `X`.
-/
instance topologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace (Path x y) :=
TopologicalSpace.induced ((↑) : _ → C(I, X)) ContinuousMap.compactOpen
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous fun p : Path x y × I => p.1 p.2 :=
continuous_eval.comp <| (continuous_induced_dom (α := Path x y)).prod_map continuous_id
#align path.continuous_eval Path.continuous_eval
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_eval {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → I}
(hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous fun y => f y (g y) :=
Continuous.comp continuous_eval (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align continuous.path_eval Continuous.path_eval
theorem continuous_uncurry_iff {Y} [TopologicalSpace Y] {g : Y → Path x y} :
Continuous ↿g ↔ Continuous g :=
Iff.symm <| continuous_induced_rng.trans
⟨fun h => continuous_uncurry_of_continuous ⟨_, h⟩,
continuous_of_continuous_uncurry (fun (y : Y) ↦ ContinuousMap.mk (g y))⟩
#align path.continuous_uncurry_iff Path.continuous_uncurry_iff
/-- A continuous map extending a path to `ℝ`, constant before `0` and after `1`. -/
def extend : ℝ → X :=
IccExtend zero_le_one γ
#align path.extend Path.extend
/-- See Note [continuity lemma statement]. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_extend {γ : Y → Path x y} {f : Y → ℝ} (hγ : Continuous ↿γ)
(hf : Continuous f) : Continuous fun t => (γ t).extend (f t) :=
Continuous.IccExtend hγ hf
#align continuous.path_extend Continuous.path_extend
/-- A useful special case of `Continuous.path_extend`. -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_extend : Continuous γ.extend :=
γ.continuous.Icc_extend'
#align path.continuous_extend Path.continuous_extend
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
{l r : Y → X} {y : Y} {l₁ : Filter ℝ} {l₂ : Filter X} {γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y)}
(hγ : Tendsto (↿γ) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁.map (projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one)) l₂) :
Tendsto (↿fun x => (γ x).extend) (𝓝 y ×ˢ l₁) l₂ :=
Filter.Tendsto.IccExtend _ hγ
#align filter.tendsto.path_extend Filter.Tendsto.path_extend
theorem _root_.ContinuousAt.path_extend {g : Y → ℝ} {l r : Y → X} (γ : ∀ y, Path (l y) (r y))
{y : Y} (hγ : ContinuousAt (↿γ) (y, projIcc 0 1 zero_le_one (g y))) (hg : ContinuousAt g y) :
ContinuousAt (fun i => (γ i).extend (g i)) y :=
hγ.IccExtend (fun x => γ x) hg
#align continuous_at.path_extend ContinuousAt.path_extend
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
IccExtend_of_mem _ γ ht
#align path.extend_extends Path.extend_extends
theorem extend_zero : γ.extend 0 = x := by simp
#align path.extend_zero Path.extend_zero
theorem extend_one : γ.extend 1 = y := by simp
#align path.extend_one Path.extend_one
@[simp]
theorem extend_extends' {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ)) : γ.extend t = γ t :=
IccExtend_val _ γ t
#align path.extend_extends' Path.extend_extends'
@[simp]
theorem extend_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
range γ.extend = range γ :=
IccExtend_range _ γ
#align path.extend_range Path.extend_range
theorem extend_of_le_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : t ≤ 0) : γ.extend t = a :=
(IccExtend_of_le_left _ _ ht).trans γ.source
#align path.extend_of_le_zero Path.extend_of_le_zero
theorem extend_of_one_le {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t : ℝ}
(ht : 1 ≤ t) : γ.extend t = b :=
(IccExtend_of_right_le _ _ ht).trans γ.target
#align path.extend_of_one_le Path.extend_of_one_le
@[simp]
theorem refl_extend {a : X} : (Path.refl a).extend = fun _ => a :=
rfl
#align path.refl_extend Path.refl_extend
/-- The path obtained from a map defined on `ℝ` by restriction to the unit interval. -/
def ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) : Path x y where
toFun := f ∘ ((↑) : unitInterval → ℝ)
continuous_toFun := hf.comp_continuous continuous_subtype_val Subtype.prop
source' := h₀
target' := h₁
#align path.of_line Path.ofLine
theorem ofLine_mem {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y) :
∀ t, ofLine hf h₀ h₁ t ∈ f '' I := fun ⟨t, t_in⟩ => ⟨t, t_in, rfl⟩
#align path.of_line_mem Path.ofLine_mem
attribute [local simp] Iic_def
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
/-- Concatenation of two paths from `x` to `y` and from `y` to `z`, putting the first
path on `[0, 1/2]` and the second one on `[1/2, 1]`. -/
@[trans]
def trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : Path x z where
toFun := (fun t : ℝ => if t ≤ 1 / 2 then γ.extend (2 * t) else γ'.extend (2 * t - 1)) ∘ (↑)
continuous_toFun := by
refine
(Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ continuous_id continuous_const (by norm_num)).comp
continuous_subtype_val <;>
continuity
source' := by norm_num
target' := by norm_num
#align path.trans Path.trans
theorem trans_apply (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) (t : I) :
(γ.trans γ') t =
if h : (t : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2 then γ ⟨2 * t, (mul_pos_mem_iff zero_lt_two).2 ⟨t.2.1, h⟩⟩
else γ' ⟨2 * t - 1, two_mul_sub_one_mem_iff.2 ⟨(not_le.1 h).le, t.2.2⟩⟩ :=
show ite _ _ _ = _ by split_ifs <;> rw [extend_extends]
#align path.trans_apply Path.trans_apply
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) : (γ.trans γ').symm = γ'.symm.trans γ.symm := by
ext t
simp only [trans_apply, ← one_div, symm_apply, not_le, Function.comp_apply]
split_ifs with h h₁ h₂ <;> rw [coe_symm_eq] at h
· have ht : (t : ℝ) = 1 / 2 := by linarith
norm_num [ht]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, mul_sub]
· refine congr_arg _ (Subtype.ext ?_)
norm_num [mul_sub, h]
ring -- TODO norm_num should really do this
· exfalso
linarith
#align path.trans_symm Path.trans_symm
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans_refl {a : X} :
(Path.refl a).trans (Path.refl a) = Path.refl a := by
ext
simp only [Path.trans, ite_self, one_div, Path.refl_extend]
rfl
#align path.refl_trans_refl Path.refl_trans_refl
theorem trans_range {a b c : X} (γ₁ : Path a b) (γ₂ : Path b c) :
range (γ₁.trans γ₂) = range γ₁ ∪ range γ₂ := by
rw [Path.trans]
apply eq_of_subset_of_subset
· rintro x ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩
by_cases h : t ≤ 1 / 2
· left
use ⟨2 * t, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₁.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos h] at hxt
· right
use ⟨2 * t - 1, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [← γ₂.extend_extends]
rwa [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_neg h] at hxt
· rintro x (⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩ | ⟨⟨t, ht0, ht1⟩, hxt⟩)
· use ⟨t / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
have : t / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := (div_le_div_right (zero_lt_two : (0 : ℝ) < 2)).mpr ht1
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos this, Subtype.coe_mk]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₁.extend_extends]
· by_cases h : t = 0
· use ⟨1 / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, if_pos le_rfl, Subtype.coe_mk,
mul_one_div_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
rw [γ₁.extend_one]
rwa [← γ₂.extend_extends, h, γ₂.extend_zero] at hxt
· use ⟨(t + 1) / 2, ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
replace h : t ≠ 0 := h
have ht0 := lt_of_le_of_ne ht0 h.symm
have : ¬(t + 1) / 2 ≤ 1 / 2 := by
rw [not_le]
linarith
rw [coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, Subtype.coe_mk, if_neg this]
ring_nf
rwa [γ₂.extend_extends]
#align path.trans_range Path.trans_range
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a map which is continuous on the path. -/
def map' (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : ContinuousOn f (range γ)) : Path (f x) (f y) where
toFun := f ∘ γ
continuous_toFun := h.comp_continuous γ.continuous (fun x ↦ mem_range_self x)
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
/-- Image of a path from `x` to `y` by a continuous map -/
def map (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
Path (f x) (f y) := γ.map' h.continuousOn
#align path.map Path.map
@[simp]
theorem map_coe (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h : I → Y) = f ∘ γ := by
ext t
rfl
#align path.map_coe Path.map_coe
@[simp]
theorem map_symm (γ : Path x y) {f : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) :
(γ.map h).symm = γ.symm.map h :=
rfl
#align path.map_symm Path.map_symm
@[simp]
theorem map_trans (γ : Path x y) (γ' : Path y z) {f : X → Y}
(h : Continuous f) : (γ.trans γ').map h = (γ.map h).trans (γ'.map h) := by
ext t
rw [trans_apply, map_coe, Function.comp_apply, trans_apply]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.map_trans Path.map_trans
@[simp]
theorem map_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.map continuous_id = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_id Path.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_map (γ : Path x y) {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace Z]
{f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) :
(γ.map hf).map hg = γ.map (hg.comp hf) := by
ext
rfl
#align path.map_map Path.map_map
/-- Casting a path from `x` to `y` to a path from `x'` to `y'` when `x' = x` and `y' = y` -/
def cast (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : Path x' y' where
toFun := γ
continuous_toFun := γ.continuous
source' := by simp [hx]
target' := by simp [hy]
#align path.cast Path.cast
@[simp]
theorem symm_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).symm = γ.symm.cast hb ha :=
rfl
#align path.symm_cast Path.symm_cast
@[simp]
theorem trans_cast {a₁ a₂ b₁ b₂ c₁ c₂ : X} (γ : Path a₂ b₂)
(γ' : Path b₂ c₂) (ha : a₁ = a₂) (hb : b₁ = b₂) (hc : c₁ = c₂) :
(γ.cast ha hb).trans (γ'.cast hb hc) = (γ.trans γ').cast ha hc :=
rfl
#align path.trans_cast Path.trans_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_coe (γ : Path x y) {x' y'} (hx : x' = x) (hy : y' = y) : (γ.cast hx hy : I → X) = γ :=
rfl
#align path.cast_coe Path.cast_coe
@[continuity]
theorem symm_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).symm :=
h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_symm)
#align path.symm_continuous_family Path.symm_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous (symm : Path x y → Path y x) :=
continuous_uncurry_iff.mp <| symm_continuous_family _ (continuous_fst.path_eval continuous_snd)
#align path.continuous_symm Path.continuous_symm
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b : ι → X} (γ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h : Continuous ↿γ) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ t).extend := by
apply h.comp (continuous_id.prod_map continuous_projIcc)
exact zero_le_one
#align path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem trans_continuous_family {ι : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ι]
{a b c : ι → X} (γ₁ : ∀ t : ι, Path (a t) (b t)) (h₁ : Continuous ↿γ₁)
(γ₂ : ∀ t : ι, Path (b t) (c t)) (h₂ : Continuous ↿γ₂) :
Continuous ↿fun t => (γ₁ t).trans (γ₂ t) := by
have h₁' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₁ h₁
have h₂' := Path.continuous_uncurry_extend_of_continuous_family γ₂ h₂
simp only [HasUncurry.uncurry, CoeFun.coe, Path.trans, (· ∘ ·)]
refine Continuous.if_le ?_ ?_ (continuous_subtype_val.comp continuous_snd) continuous_const ?_
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₁ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x : I → ℝ))
exact h₁'.comp (continuous_id.prod_map <| continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val)
· change
Continuous ((fun p : ι × ℝ => (γ₂ p.1).extend p.2) ∘ Prod.map id (fun x => 2 * x - 1 : I → ℝ))
exact
h₂'.comp
(continuous_id.prod_map <|
(continuous_const.mul continuous_subtype_val).sub continuous_const)
· rintro st hst
simp [hst, mul_inv_cancel (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
#align path.trans_continuous_family Path.trans_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem _root_.Continuous.path_trans {f : Y → Path x y} {g : Y → Path y z} :
Continuous f → Continuous g → Continuous fun t => (f t).trans (g t) := by
intro hf hg
apply continuous_uncurry_iff.mp
exact trans_continuous_family _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hf) _ (continuous_uncurry_iff.mpr hg)
#align continuous.path_trans Continuous.path_trans
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_trans {x y z : X} : Continuous fun ρ : Path x y × Path y z => ρ.1.trans ρ.2 :=
continuous_fst.path_trans continuous_snd
#align path.continuous_trans Path.continuous_trans
/-! #### Product of paths -/
section Prod
variable {a₁ a₂ a₃ : X} {b₁ b₂ b₃ : Y}
/-- Given a path in `X` and a path in `Y`, we can take their pointwise product to get a path in
`X × Y`. -/
protected def prod (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) : Path (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.prodMk γ₁.toContinuousMap γ₂.toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.prod Path.prod
@[simp]
theorem prod_coe (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂) :
⇑(γ₁.prod γ₂) = fun t => (γ₁ t, γ₂ t) :=
rfl
#align path.prod_coe_fn Path.prod_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_prod_eq_prod_trans (γ₁ : Path a₁ a₂) (δ₁ : Path a₂ a₃) (γ₂ : Path b₁ b₂)
(δ₂ : Path b₂ b₃) : (γ₁.prod γ₂).trans (δ₁.prod δ₂) = (γ₁.trans δ₁).prod (γ₂.trans δ₂) := by
ext t <;>
unfold Path.trans <;>
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Path.prod_coe, Function.comp_apply] <;>
split_ifs <;>
rfl
#align path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans Path.trans_prod_eq_prod_trans
end Prod
section Pi
variable {χ : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (χ i)] {as bs cs : ∀ i, χ i}
/-- Given a family of paths, one in each Xᵢ, we take their pointwise product to get a path in
Π i, Xᵢ. -/
protected def pi (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : Path as bs where
toContinuousMap := ContinuousMap.pi fun i => (γ i).toContinuousMap
source' := by simp
target' := by simp
#align path.pi Path.pi
@[simp]
theorem pi_coe (γ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) : ⇑(Path.pi γ) = fun t i => γ i t :=
rfl
#align path.pi_coe_fn Path.pi_coe
/-- Path composition commutes with products -/
theorem trans_pi_eq_pi_trans (γ₀ : ∀ i, Path (as i) (bs i)) (γ₁ : ∀ i, Path (bs i) (cs i)) :
(Path.pi γ₀).trans (Path.pi γ₁) = Path.pi fun i => (γ₀ i).trans (γ₁ i) := by
ext t i
unfold Path.trans
simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, Function.comp_apply, pi_coe]
split_ifs <;> rfl
#align path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans Path.trans_pi_eq_pi_trans
end Pi
/-! #### Pointwise multiplication/addition of two paths in a topological (additive) group -/
/-- Pointwise multiplication of paths in a topological group. The additive version is probably more
useful. -/
@[to_additive "Pointwise addition of paths in a topological additive group."]
protected def mul [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁) (γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) :
Path (a₁ * a₂) (b₁ * b₂) :=
(γ₁.prod γ₂).map continuous_mul
#align path.mul Path.mul
#align path.add Path.add
@[to_additive]
protected theorem mul_apply [Mul X] [ContinuousMul X] {a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ : X} (γ₁ : Path a₁ b₁)
(γ₂ : Path a₂ b₂) (t : unitInterval) : (γ₁.mul γ₂) t = γ₁ t * γ₂ t :=
rfl
#align path.mul_apply Path.mul_apply
#align path.add_apply Path.add_apply
/-! #### Truncating a path -/
/-- `γ.truncate t₀ t₁` is the path which follows the path `γ` on the
time interval `[t₀, t₁]` and stays still otherwise. -/
def truncate {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t₀ t₁ : ℝ) :
Path (γ.extend <| min t₀ t₁) (γ.extend t₁) where
toFun s := γ.extend (min (max s t₀) t₁)
continuous_toFun :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp ((continuous_subtype_val.max continuous_const).min continuous_const)
source' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄
· simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
· congr
linarith
· have h₄ : t₁ ≤ 0 := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₂)
simp [γ.extend_of_le_zero h₄, γ.extend_of_le_zero h₁]
all_goals rfl
target' := by
simp only [min_def, max_def']
norm_cast
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃
· simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₂]
· rfl
· have h₄ : 1 ≤ t₀ := le_of_lt (by simpa using h₁)
simp [γ.extend_of_one_le h₄, γ.extend_of_one_le (h₄.trans h₃)]
· rfl
#align path.truncate Path.truncate
/-- `γ.truncateOfLE t₀ t₁ h`, where `h : t₀ ≤ t₁` is `γ.truncate t₀ t₁`
casted as a path from `γ.extend t₀` to `γ.extend t₁`. -/
def truncateOfLE {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ}
(h : t₀ ≤ t₁) : Path (γ.extend t₀) (γ.extend t₁) :=
(γ.truncate t₀ t₁).cast (by rw [min_eq_left h]) rfl
#align path.truncate_of_le Path.truncateOfLE
theorem truncate_range {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) {t₀ t₁ : ℝ} :
range (γ.truncate t₀ t₁) ⊆ range γ := by
rw [← γ.extend_range]
simp only [range_subset_iff, SetCoe.exists, SetCoe.forall]
intro x _hx
simp only [DFunLike.coe, Path.truncate, mem_range_self]
#align path.truncate_range Path.truncate_range
/-- For a path `γ`, `γ.truncate` gives a "continuous family of paths", by which we
mean the uncurried function which maps `(t₀, t₁, s)` to `γ.truncate t₀ t₁ s` is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
Continuous (fun x => γ.truncate x.1 x.2.1 x.2.2 : ℝ × ℝ × I → X) :=
γ.continuous_extend.comp
(((continuous_subtype_val.comp (continuous_snd.comp continuous_snd)).max continuous_fst).min
(continuous_fst.comp continuous_snd))
#align path.truncate_continuous_family Path.truncate_continuous_family
@[continuity]
theorem truncate_const_continuous_family {a b : X} (γ : Path a b)
(t : ℝ) : Continuous ↿(γ.truncate t) := by
have key : Continuous (fun x => (t, x) : ℝ × I → ℝ × ℝ × I) := by continuity
exact γ.truncate_continuous_family.comp key
#align path.truncate_const_continuous_family Path.truncate_const_continuous_family
@[simp]
theorem truncate_self {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) (t : ℝ) :
γ.truncate t t = (Path.refl <| γ.extend t).cast (by rw [min_self]) rfl := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
simp only [truncate, DFunLike.coe, refl, min_def, max_def]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ <;> congr
#align path.truncate_self Path.truncate_self
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_zero_zero {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 0 = (Path.refl a).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_zero]) γ.extend_zero := by
convert γ.truncate_self 0
#align path.truncate_zero_zero Path.truncate_zero_zero
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase `simp` priority so left-hand side doesn't simplify
theorem truncate_one_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 1 1 = (Path.refl b).cast (by rw [min_self, γ.extend_one]) γ.extend_one := by
convert γ.truncate_self 1
#align path.truncate_one_one Path.truncate_one_one
@[simp]
theorem truncate_zero_one {a b : X} (γ : Path a b) :
γ.truncate 0 1 = γ.cast (by simp [zero_le_one, extend_zero]) (by simp) := by
ext x
rw [cast_coe]
have : ↑x ∈ (Icc 0 1 : Set ℝ) := x.2
rw [truncate, coe_mk_mk, max_eq_left this.1, min_eq_left this.2, extend_extends']
#align path.truncate_zero_one Path.truncate_zero_one
/-! #### Reparametrising a path -/
/-- Given a path `γ` and a function `f : I → I` where `f 0 = 0` and `f 1 = 1`, `γ.reparam f` is the
path defined by `γ ∘ f`.
-/
def reparam (γ : Path x y) (f : I → I) (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
Path x y where
toFun := γ ∘ f
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp [hf₀]
target' := by simp [hf₁]
#align path.reparam Path.reparam
@[simp]
theorem coe_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : ⇑(γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = γ ∘ f :=
rfl
#align path.coe_to_fun Path.coe_reparam
-- Porting note: this seems like it was poorly named (was: `coe_to_fun`)
@[simp]
theorem reparam_id (γ : Path x y) : γ.reparam id continuous_id rfl rfl = γ := by
ext
rfl
#align path.reparam_id Path.reparam_id
theorem range_reparam (γ : Path x y) {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0)
(hf₁ : f 1 = 1) : range (γ.reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁) = range γ := by
change range (γ ∘ f) = range γ
have : range f = univ := by
rw [range_iff_surjective]
intro t
have h₁ : Continuous (Set.IccExtend (zero_le_one' ℝ) f) := by continuity
have := intermediate_value_Icc (zero_le_one' ℝ) h₁.continuousOn
· rw [IccExtend_left, IccExtend_right, Icc.mk_zero, Icc.mk_one, hf₀, hf₁] at this
rcases this t.2 with ⟨w, hw₁, hw₂⟩
rw [IccExtend_of_mem _ _ hw₁] at hw₂
exact ⟨_, hw₂⟩
rw [range_comp, this, image_univ]
#align path.range_reparam Path.range_reparam
theorem refl_reparam {f : I → I} (hfcont : Continuous f) (hf₀ : f 0 = 0) (hf₁ : f 1 = 1) :
(refl x).reparam f hfcont hf₀ hf₁ = refl x := by
ext
simp
#align path.refl_reparam Path.refl_reparam
end Path
/-! ### Being joined by a path -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path". This is an equivalence relation. -/
def Joined (x y : X) : Prop :=
Nonempty (Path x y)
#align joined Joined
@[refl]
theorem Joined.refl (x : X) : Joined x x :=
⟨Path.refl x⟩
#align joined.refl Joined.refl
/-- When two points are joined, choose some path from `x` to `y`. -/
def Joined.somePath (h : Joined x y) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some h
#align joined.some_path Joined.somePath
@[symm]
theorem Joined.symm {x y : X} (h : Joined x y) : Joined y x :=
⟨h.somePath.symm⟩
#align joined.symm Joined.symm
@[trans]
theorem Joined.trans {x y z : X} (hxy : Joined x y) (hyz : Joined y z) : Joined x z :=
⟨hxy.somePath.trans hyz.somePath⟩
#align joined.trans Joined.trans
variable (X)
/-- The setoid corresponding the equivalence relation of being joined by a continuous path. -/
def pathSetoid : Setoid X where
r := Joined
iseqv := Equivalence.mk Joined.refl Joined.symm Joined.trans
#align path_setoid pathSetoid
/-- The quotient type of points of a topological space modulo being joined by a continuous path. -/
def ZerothHomotopy :=
Quotient (pathSetoid X)
#align zeroth_homotopy ZerothHomotopy
instance ZerothHomotopy.inhabited : Inhabited (ZerothHomotopy ℝ) :=
⟨@Quotient.mk' ℝ (pathSetoid ℝ) 0⟩
variable {X}
/-! ### Being joined by a path inside a set -/
/-- The relation "being joined by a path in `F`". Not quite an equivalence relation since it's not
reflexive for points that do not belong to `F`. -/
def JoinedIn (F : Set X) (x y : X) : Prop :=
∃ γ : Path x y, ∀ t, γ t ∈ F
#align joined_in JoinedIn
variable {F : Set X}
theorem JoinedIn.mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F ∧ y ∈ F := by
rcases h with ⟨γ, γ_in⟩
have : γ 0 ∈ F ∧ γ 1 ∈ F := by constructor <;> apply γ_in
simpa using this
#align joined_in.mem JoinedIn.mem
theorem JoinedIn.source_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : x ∈ F :=
h.mem.1
#align joined_in.source_mem JoinedIn.source_mem
theorem JoinedIn.target_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) : y ∈ F :=
h.mem.2
#align joined_in.target_mem JoinedIn.target_mem
/-- When `x` and `y` are joined in `F`, choose a path from `x` to `y` inside `F` -/
def JoinedIn.somePath (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Path x y :=
Classical.choose h
#align joined_in.some_path JoinedIn.somePath
theorem JoinedIn.somePath_mem (h : JoinedIn F x y) (t : I) : h.somePath t ∈ F :=
Classical.choose_spec h t
#align joined_in.some_path_mem JoinedIn.somePath_mem
/-- If `x` and `y` are joined in the set `F`, then they are joined in the subtype `F`. -/
theorem JoinedIn.joined_subtype (h : JoinedIn F x y) :
Joined (⟨x, h.source_mem⟩ : F) (⟨y, h.target_mem⟩ : F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun t => ⟨h.somePath t, h.somePath_mem t⟩
continuous_toFun := by continuity
source' := by simp
target' := by simp }⟩
#align joined_in.joined_subtype JoinedIn.joined_subtype
theorem JoinedIn.ofLine {f : ℝ → X} (hf : ContinuousOn f I) (h₀ : f 0 = x) (h₁ : f 1 = y)
(hF : f '' I ⊆ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨Path.ofLine hf h₀ h₁, fun t => hF <| Path.ofLine_mem hf h₀ h₁ t⟩
#align joined_in.of_line JoinedIn.ofLine
theorem JoinedIn.joined (h : JoinedIn F x y) : Joined x y :=
⟨h.somePath⟩
#align joined_in.joined JoinedIn.joined
theorem joinedIn_iff_joined (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
JoinedIn F x y ↔ Joined (⟨x, x_in⟩ : F) (⟨y, y_in⟩ : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.joined_subtype, fun h => ⟨h.somePath.map continuous_subtype_val, by simp⟩⟩
#align joined_in_iff_joined joinedIn_iff_joined
@[simp]
theorem joinedIn_univ : JoinedIn univ x y ↔ Joined x y := by
simp [JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align joined_in_univ joinedIn_univ
theorem JoinedIn.mono {U V : Set X} (h : JoinedIn U x y) (hUV : U ⊆ V) : JoinedIn V x y :=
⟨h.somePath, fun t => hUV (h.somePath_mem t)⟩
#align joined_in.mono JoinedIn.mono
theorem JoinedIn.refl (h : x ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x x :=
⟨Path.refl x, fun _t => h⟩
#align joined_in.refl JoinedIn.refl
@[symm]
theorem JoinedIn.symm (h : JoinedIn F x y) : JoinedIn F y x := by
cases' h.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact h.symm
#align joined_in.symm JoinedIn.symm
theorem JoinedIn.trans (hxy : JoinedIn F x y) (hyz : JoinedIn F y z) : JoinedIn F x z := by
cases' hxy.mem with hx hy
cases' hyz.mem with hx hy
simp_all [joinedIn_iff_joined]
exact hxy.trans hyz
#align joined_in.trans JoinedIn.trans
theorem Specializes.joinedIn (h : x ⤳ y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y := by
refine ⟨⟨⟨Set.piecewise {1} (const I y) (const I x), ?_⟩, by simp, by simp⟩, fun t ↦ ?_⟩
· exact isClosed_singleton.continuous_piecewise_of_specializes continuous_const continuous_const
fun _ ↦ h
· simp only [Path.coe_mk_mk, piecewise]
split_ifs <;> assumption
theorem Inseparable.joinedIn (h : Inseparable x y) (hx : x ∈ F) (hy : y ∈ F) : JoinedIn F x y :=
h.specializes.joinedIn hx hy
/-! ### Path component -/
/-- The path component of `x` is the set of points that can be joined to `x`. -/
def pathComponent (x : X) :=
{ y | Joined x y }
#align path_component pathComponent
@[simp]
theorem mem_pathComponent_self (x : X) : x ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.refl x
#align mem_path_component_self mem_pathComponent_self
@[simp]
theorem pathComponent.nonempty (x : X) : (pathComponent x).Nonempty :=
⟨x, mem_pathComponent_self x⟩
#align path_component.nonempty pathComponent.nonempty
theorem mem_pathComponent_of_mem (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : y ∈ pathComponent x :=
Joined.symm h
#align mem_path_component_of_mem mem_pathComponent_of_mem
theorem pathComponent_symm : x ∈ pathComponent y ↔ y ∈ pathComponent x :=
⟨fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h, fun h => mem_pathComponent_of_mem h⟩
#align path_component_symm pathComponent_symm
theorem pathComponent_congr (h : x ∈ pathComponent y) : pathComponent x = pathComponent y := by
ext z
constructor
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm]
exact (h.trans h').symm
· intro h'
rw [pathComponent_symm] at h' ⊢
exact h'.trans h
#align path_component_congr pathComponent_congr
theorem pathComponent_subset_component (x : X) : pathComponent x ⊆ connectedComponent x :=
fun y h =>
(isConnected_range h.somePath.continuous).subset_connectedComponent ⟨0, by simp⟩ ⟨1, by simp⟩
#align path_component_subset_component pathComponent_subset_component
/-- The path component of `x` in `F` is the set of points that can be joined to `x` in `F`. -/
def pathComponentIn (x : X) (F : Set X) :=
{ y | JoinedIn F x y }
#align path_component_in pathComponentIn
@[simp]
theorem pathComponentIn_univ (x : X) : pathComponentIn x univ = pathComponent x := by
simp [pathComponentIn, pathComponent, JoinedIn, Joined, exists_true_iff_nonempty]
#align path_component_in_univ pathComponentIn_univ
theorem Joined.mem_pathComponent (hyz : Joined y z) (hxy : y ∈ pathComponent x) :
z ∈ pathComponent x :=
hxy.trans hyz
#align joined.mem_path_component Joined.mem_pathComponent
/-! ### Path connected sets -/
/-- A set `F` is path connected if it contains a point that can be joined to all other in `F`. -/
def IsPathConnected (F : Set X) : Prop :=
∃ x ∈ F, ∀ {y}, y ∈ F → JoinedIn F x y
#align is_path_connected IsPathConnected
theorem isPathConnected_iff_eq : IsPathConnected F ↔ ∃ x ∈ F, pathComponentIn x F = F := by
constructor <;> rintro ⟨x, x_in, h⟩ <;> use x, x_in
· ext y
exact ⟨fun hy => hy.mem.2, h⟩
· intro y y_in
rwa [← h] at y_in
#align is_path_connected_iff_eq isPathConnected_iff_eq
theorem IsPathConnected.joinedIn (h : IsPathConnected F) :
∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y := fun _x x_in _y y_in =>
let ⟨_b, _b_in, hb⟩ := h
(hb x_in).symm.trans (hb y_in)
#align is_path_connected.joined_in IsPathConnected.joinedIn
theorem isPathConnected_iff :
IsPathConnected F ↔ F.Nonempty ∧ ∀ᵉ (x ∈ F) (y ∈ F), JoinedIn F x y :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨let ⟨b, b_in, _hb⟩ := h; ⟨b, b_in⟩, h.joinedIn⟩,
fun ⟨⟨b, b_in⟩, h⟩ => ⟨b, b_in, fun x_in => h _ b_in _ x_in⟩⟩
#align is_path_connected_iff isPathConnected_iff
/-- If `f` is continuous on `F` and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image' (hF : IsPathConnected F)
{f : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousOn f F) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
rcases hF with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f x_in
rintro _ ⟨y, y_in, rfl⟩
refine ⟨(hx y_in).somePath.map' ?_, fun t ↦ ⟨_, (hx y_in).somePath_mem t, rfl⟩⟩
exact hf.mono (range_subset_iff.2 (hx y_in).somePath_mem)
/-- If `f` is continuous and `F` is path-connected, so is `f(F)`. -/
theorem IsPathConnected.image (hF : IsPathConnected F) {f : X → Y}
(hf : Continuous f) : IsPathConnected (f '' F) := hF.image' hf.continuousOn
#align is_path_connected.image IsPathConnected.image
/-- If `f : X → Y` is a `Inducing`, `f(F)` is path-connected iff `F` is. -/
nonrec theorem Inducing.isPathConnected_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) :
IsPathConnected F ↔ IsPathConnected (f '' F) := by
refine ⟨fun hF ↦ hF.image hf.continuous, fun hF ↦ ?_⟩
simp? [isPathConnected_iff] at hF ⊢ says
simp only [isPathConnected_iff, image_nonempty, mem_image, forall_exists_index,
and_imp, forall_apply_eq_imp_iff₂] at hF ⊢
refine ⟨hF.1, fun x hx y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hF.2 x hx y hy with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
choose γ' hγ' hγγ' using hγ
have key₁ : Inseparable x (γ' 0) := by rw [← hf.inseparable_iff, hγγ' 0, γ.source]
have key₂ : Inseparable (γ' 1) y := by rw [← hf.inseparable_iff, hγγ' 1, γ.target]
refine key₁.joinedIn hx (hγ' 0) |>.trans ⟨⟨⟨γ', ?_⟩, rfl, rfl⟩, hγ'⟩ |>.trans
(key₂.joinedIn (hγ' 1) hy)
simpa [hf.continuous_iff] using γ.continuous.congr fun t ↦ (hγγ' t).symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_image {s : Set X} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h '' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s :=
h.inducing.isPathConnected_iff.symm
/-- If `h : X → Y` is a homeomorphism, `h⁻¹(s)` is path-connected iff `s` is. -/
@[simp]
theorem Homeomorph.isPathConnected_preimage {s : Set Y} (h : X ≃ₜ Y) :
IsPathConnected (h ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsPathConnected s := by
rw [← Homeomorph.image_symm]; exact h.symm.isPathConnected_image
theorem IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) (y_in : y ∈ F) :
y ∈ pathComponent x :=
(h.joinedIn x x_in y y_in).joined
#align is_path_connected.mem_path_component IsPathConnected.mem_pathComponent
theorem IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent (h : IsPathConnected F) (x_in : x ∈ F) :
F ⊆ pathComponent x := fun _y y_in => h.mem_pathComponent x_in y_in
#align is_path_connected.subset_path_component IsPathConnected.subset_pathComponent
theorem isPathConnected_singleton (x : X) : IsPathConnected ({x} : Set X) := by
refine ⟨x, rfl, ?_⟩
rintro y rfl
exact JoinedIn.refl rfl
theorem IsPathConnected.union {U V : Set X} (hU : IsPathConnected U) (hV : IsPathConnected V)
(hUV : (U ∩ V).Nonempty) : IsPathConnected (U ∪ V) := by
rcases hUV with ⟨x, xU, xV⟩
use x, Or.inl xU
rintro y (yU | yV)
· exact (hU.joinedIn x xU y yU).mono subset_union_left
· exact (hV.joinedIn x xV y yV).mono subset_union_right
#align is_path_connected.union IsPathConnected.union
/-- If a set `W` is path-connected, then it is also path-connected when seen as a set in a smaller
ambient type `U` (when `U` contains `W`). -/
theorem IsPathConnected.preimage_coe {U W : Set X} (hW : IsPathConnected W) (hWU : W ⊆ U) :
IsPathConnected (((↑) : U → X) ⁻¹' W) := by
rcases hW with ⟨x, x_in, hx⟩
use ⟨x, hWU x_in⟩, by simp [x_in]
rintro ⟨y, hyU⟩ hyW
exact ⟨(hx hyW).joined_subtype.somePath.map (continuous_inclusion hWU), by simp⟩
#align is_path_connected.preimage_coe IsPathConnected.preimage_coe
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ γ : Path (p 0) (p n), range γ ⊆ s ∧ ∀ i, p i ∈ range γ := by
let p' : ℕ → X := fun k => if h : k < n + 1 then p ⟨k, h⟩ else p ⟨0, n.zero_lt_succ⟩
obtain ⟨γ, hγ⟩ : ∃ γ : Path (p' 0) (p' n), (∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ range γ) ∧ range γ ⊆ s := by
have hp' : ∀ i ≤ n, p' i ∈ s := by
intro i hi
simp [p', Nat.lt_succ_of_le hi, hp]
clear_value p'
clear hp p
induction' n with n hn
· use Path.refl (p' 0)
constructor
· rintro i hi
rw [Nat.le_zero.mp hi]
exact ⟨0, rfl⟩
· rw [range_subset_iff]
rintro _x
exact hp' 0 le_rfl
· rcases hn fun i hi => hp' i <| Nat.le_succ_of_le hi with ⟨γ₀, hγ₀⟩
rcases h.joinedIn (p' n) (hp' n n.le_succ) (p' <| n + 1) (hp' (n + 1) <| le_rfl) with
⟨γ₁, hγ₁⟩
let γ : Path (p' 0) (p' <| n + 1) := γ₀.trans γ₁
use γ
have range_eq : range γ = range γ₀ ∪ range γ₁ := γ₀.trans_range γ₁
constructor
· rintro i hi
by_cases hi' : i ≤ n
· rw [range_eq]
left
exact hγ₀.1 i hi'
· rw [not_le, ← Nat.succ_le_iff] at hi'
have : i = n.succ := le_antisymm hi hi'
rw [this]
use 1
exact γ.target
· rw [range_eq]
apply union_subset hγ₀.2
rw [range_subset_iff]
exact hγ₁
have hpp' : ∀ k < n + 1, p k = p' k := by
intro k hk
simp only [p', hk, dif_pos]
congr
ext
rw [Fin.val_cast_of_lt hk]
use γ.cast (hpp' 0 n.zero_lt_succ) (hpp' n n.lt_succ_self)
simp only [γ.cast_coe]
refine And.intro hγ.2 ?_
rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
suffices p ⟨i, hi⟩ = p' i by convert hγ.1 i (Nat.le_of_lt_succ hi)
rw [← hpp' i hi]
suffices i = i % n.succ by congr
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt hi]
#align is_path_connected.exists_path_through_family IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family
theorem IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family' {n : ℕ}
{s : Set X} (h : IsPathConnected s) (p : Fin (n + 1) → X) (hp : ∀ i, p i ∈ s) :
∃ (γ : Path (p 0) (p n)) (t : Fin (n + 1) → I), (∀ t, γ t ∈ s) ∧ ∀ i, γ (t i) = p i := by
rcases h.exists_path_through_family p hp with ⟨γ, hγ⟩
rcases hγ with ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
simp only [range, mem_setOf_eq] at h₂
rw [range_subset_iff] at h₁
choose! t ht using h₂
exact ⟨γ, t, h₁, ht⟩
#align is_path_connected.exists_path_through_family' IsPathConnected.exists_path_through_family'
/-! ### Path connected spaces -/
/-- A topological space is path-connected if it is non-empty and every two points can be
joined by a continuous path. -/
class PathConnectedSpace (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Prop where
/-- A path-connected space must be nonempty. -/
nonempty : Nonempty X
/-- Any two points in a path-connected space must be joined by a continuous path. -/
joined : ∀ x y : X, Joined x y
#align path_connected_space PathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy :
PathConnectedSpace X ↔ Nonempty (ZerothHomotopy X) ∧ Subsingleton (ZerothHomotopy X) := by
letI := pathSetoid X
constructor
· intro h
refine ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mpr h.1, ⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨x⟩ ⟨y⟩
exact Quotient.sound (PathConnectedSpace.joined x y)
· unfold ZerothHomotopy
rintro ⟨h, h'⟩
exact ⟨(nonempty_quotient_iff _).mp h, fun x y => Quotient.exact <| Subsingleton.elim ⟦x⟧ ⟦y⟧⟩
#align path_connected_space_iff_zeroth_homotopy pathConnectedSpace_iff_zerothHomotopy
namespace PathConnectedSpace
variable [PathConnectedSpace X]
/-- Use path-connectedness to build a path between two points. -/
def somePath (x y : X) : Path x y :=
Nonempty.some (joined x y)
#align path_connected_space.some_path PathConnectedSpace.somePath
end PathConnectedSpace
theorem isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace : IsPathConnected F ↔ PathConnectedSpace F := by
rw [isPathConnected_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, h⟩
refine ⟨⟨⟨x, x_in⟩⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, y_in⟩ ⟨z, z_in⟩
have H := h y y_in z z_in
rwa [joinedIn_iff_joined y_in z_in] at H
· rintro ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, H⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, x_in⟩, fun y y_in z z_in => ?_⟩
rw [joinedIn_iff_joined y_in z_in]
apply H
#align is_path_connected_iff_path_connected_space isPathConnected_iff_pathConnectedSpace
theorem pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ : PathConnectedSpace X ↔ IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro h
haveI := @PathConnectedSpace.nonempty X _ _
inhabit X
refine ⟨default, mem_univ _, ?_⟩
intros y _hy
simpa using PathConnectedSpace.joined default y
· intro h
have h' := h.joinedIn
cases' h with x h
exact ⟨⟨x⟩, by simpa using h'⟩
#align path_connected_space_iff_univ pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ
theorem isPathConnected_univ [PathConnectedSpace X] : IsPathConnected (univ : Set X) :=
pathConnectedSpace_iff_univ.mp inferInstance
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/PathConnected.lean | 1,188 | 1,191 | theorem isPathConnected_range [PathConnectedSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
IsPathConnected (range f) := by |
rw [← image_univ]
exact isPathConnected_univ.image hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Richard M. Hill. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Richard M. Hill
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.Basic
/-!
# Definitions
In this file we define an operation `derivative` (formal differentiation)
on the ring of formal power series in one variable (over an arbitrary commutative semiring).
Under suitable assumptions, we prove that two power series are equal if their derivatives
are equal and their constant terms are equal. This will give us a simple tool for proving
power series identities. For example, one can easily prove the power series identity
$\exp ( \log (1+X)) = 1+X$ by differentiating twice.
## Main Definition
- `PowerSeries.derivative R : Derivation R R⟦X⟧ R⟦X⟧` the formal derivative operation.
This is abbreviated `d⁄dX R`.
-/
namespace PowerSeries
open Polynomial Derivation Nat
section CommutativeSemiring
variable {R} [CommSemiring R]
/--
The formal derivative of a power series in one variable.
This is defined here as a function, but will be packaged as a
derivation `derivative` on `R⟦X⟧`.
-/
noncomputable def derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) : R⟦X⟧ := mk fun n ↦ coeff R (n + 1) f * (n + 1)
theorem coeff_derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n f.derivativeFun = coeff R (n + 1) f * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivativeFun, coeff_mk]
theorem derivativeFun_coe (f : R[X]) : (f : R⟦X⟧).derivativeFun = derivative f := by
ext
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_coe, coeff_coe, coeff_derivative]
theorem derivativeFun_add (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
derivativeFun (f + g) = derivativeFun f + derivativeFun g := by
ext
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, map_add, map_add, coeff_derivativeFun,
coeff_derivativeFun, add_mul]
theorem derivativeFun_C (r : R) : derivativeFun (C R r) = 0 := by
ext n
-- Note that `map_zero` didn't get picked up, apparently due to a missing `FunLike.coe`
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_succ_C, zero_mul, (coeff R n).map_zero]
theorem trunc_derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n f.derivativeFun = derivative (trunc (n + 1) f) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· have : d + 1 < n + 1 := succ_lt_succ_iff.2 h
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_derivative, coeff_trunc, if_pos this]
· have : ¬d + 1 < n + 1 := by rwa [succ_lt_succ_iff]
rw [coeff_derivative, coeff_trunc, if_neg this, zero_mul]
--A special case of `derivativeFun_mul`, used in its proof.
private theorem derivativeFun_coe_mul_coe (f g : R[X]) : derivativeFun (f * g : R⟦X⟧) =
f * derivative g + g * derivative f := by
rw [← coe_mul, derivativeFun_coe, derivative_mul,
add_comm, mul_comm _ g, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, Polynomial.coe_add]
/-- **Leibniz rule for formal power series**. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Derivative.lean | 77 | 85 | theorem derivativeFun_mul (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
derivativeFun (f * g) = f • g.derivativeFun + g • f.derivativeFun := by |
ext n
have h₁ : n < n + 1 := lt_succ_self n
have h₂ : n < n + 1 + 1 := Nat.lt_add_right _ h₁
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, map_add, coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc _ _ (lt_succ_self _),
smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc₂ g f.derivativeFun h₂ h₁,
coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc₂ f g.derivativeFun h₂ h₁, trunc_derivativeFun,
trunc_derivativeFun, ← map_add, ← derivativeFun_coe_mul_coe, coeff_derivativeFun]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import order.upper_lower.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0c52abb75074ed8b73a948341f50521fbf43b4c"
/-!
# Up-sets and down-sets
This file defines upper and lower sets in an order.
## Main declarations
* `IsUpperSet`: Predicate for a set to be an upper set. This means every element greater than a
member of the set is in the set itself.
* `IsLowerSet`: Predicate for a set to be a lower set. This means every element less than a member
of the set is in the set itself.
* `UpperSet`: The type of upper sets.
* `LowerSet`: The type of lower sets.
* `upperClosure`: The greatest upper set containing a set.
* `lowerClosure`: The least lower set containing a set.
* `UpperSet.Ici`: Principal upper set. `Set.Ici` as an upper set.
* `UpperSet.Ioi`: Strict principal upper set. `Set.Ioi` as an upper set.
* `LowerSet.Iic`: Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set.
* `LowerSet.Iio`: Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set.
## Notation
* `×ˢ` is notation for `UpperSet.prod` / `LowerSet.prod`.
## Notes
Upper sets are ordered by **reverse** inclusion. This convention is motivated by the fact that this
makes them order-isomorphic to lower sets and antichains, and matches the convention on `Filter`.
## TODO
Lattice structure on antichains. Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-! ### Unbundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
/-- An upper set in an order `α` is a set such that any element greater than one of its members is
also a member. Also called up-set, upward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsUpperSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≤ b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_upper_set IsUpperSet
/-- A lower set in an order `α` is a set such that any element less than one of its members is also
a member. Also called down-set, downward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsLowerSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b ≤ a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_lower_set IsLowerSet
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_empty isUpperSet_empty
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_empty isLowerSet_empty
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_univ isUpperSet_univ
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_univ isLowerSet_univ
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_upper_set.compl IsUpperSet.compl
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_lower_set.compl IsLowerSet.compl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
#align is_upper_set_compl isUpperSet_compl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
#align is_lower_set_compl isLowerSet_compl
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.union IsUpperSet.union
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.union IsLowerSet.union
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.inter IsUpperSet.inter
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.inter IsLowerSet.inter
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_upper_set_sUnion isUpperSet_sUnion
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_lower_set_sUnion isLowerSet_sUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Union isUpperSet_iUnion
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Union isLowerSet_iUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Union₂ isUpperSet_iUnion₂
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Union₂ isLowerSet_iUnion₂
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_upper_set_sInter isUpperSet_sInter
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_lower_set_sInter isLowerSet_sInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Inter isUpperSet_iInter
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Inter isLowerSet_iInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Inter₂ isUpperSet_iInter₂
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Inter₂ isLowerSet_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.to_dual IsUpperSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.to_dual IsLowerSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.of_dual IsUpperSet.ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.of_dual IsLowerSet.ofDual
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
#align is_upper_set_Ici isUpperSet_Ici
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
#align is_lower_set_Iic isLowerSet_Iic
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align is_upper_set_Ioi isUpperSet_Ioi
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
#align is_lower_set_Iio isLowerSet_Iio
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ici_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iic_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
#align is_upper_set.Ici_subset IsUpperSet.Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
#align is_lower_set.Iic_subset IsLowerSet.Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
#align is_upper_set.Ioi_subset IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
#align is_lower_set.Iio_subset IsLowerSet.Iio_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.ord_connected IsUpperSet.ordConnected
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
#align is_lower_set.ord_connected IsLowerSet.ordConnected
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_upper_set.preimage IsUpperSet.preimage
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_lower_set.preimage IsLowerSet.preimage
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_upper_set.image IsUpperSet.image
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_lower_set.image IsLowerSet.image
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.monotone_mem Set.monotone_mem
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
#align set.antitone_mem Set.antitone_mem
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_set_of isUpperSet_setOf
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
#align is_lower_set_set_of isLowerSet_setOf
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_lower_set.top_mem IsLowerSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.top_mem IsUpperSet.top_mem
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_upper_set.not_top_mem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
#align is_upper_set.bot_mem IsUpperSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
#align is_lower_set.bot_mem IsLowerSet.bot_mem
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
#align is_lower_set.not_bot_mem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
#align is_upper_set.not_bdd_above IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
#align not_bdd_above_Ici not_bddAbove_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
#align not_bdd_above_Ioi not_bddAbove_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
#align is_lower_set.not_bdd_below IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
#align not_bdd_below_Iic not_bddBelow_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
#align not_bdd_below_Iio not_bddBelow_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_upper_set_iff_forall_lt isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
#align is_lower_set_iff_forall_lt isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ioi_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iio_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
#align is_upper_set.total IsUpperSet.total
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
#align is_lower_set.total IsLowerSet.total
end LinearOrder
/-! ### Bundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α]
/-- The type of upper sets of an order. -/
structure UpperSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of an `UpperSet` is an upper set. -/
upper' : IsUpperSet carrier
#align upper_set UpperSet
/-- The type of lower sets of an order. -/
structure LowerSet (α : Type*) [LE α] where
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet`. -/
carrier : Set α
/-- The carrier of a `LowerSet` is a lower set. -/
lower' : IsLowerSet carrier
#align lower_set LowerSet
namespace UpperSet
instance : SetLike (UpperSet α) α where
coe := UpperSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : UpperSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections UpperSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : UpperSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align upper_set.ext UpperSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : UpperSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.carrier_eq_coe UpperSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma upper (s : UpperSet α) : IsUpperSet (s : Set α) := s.upper'
#align upper_set.upper UpperSet.upper
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_mk UpperSet.mem_mk
end UpperSet
namespace LowerSet
instance : SetLike (LowerSet α) α where
coe := LowerSet.carrier
coe_injective' s t h := by cases s; cases t; congr
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. -/
def Simps.coe (s : LowerSet α) : Set α := s
initialize_simps_projections LowerSet (carrier → coe)
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : LowerSet α} : (s : Set α) = t → s = t :=
SetLike.ext'
#align lower_set.ext LowerSet.ext
@[simp]
theorem carrier_eq_coe (s : LowerSet α) : s.carrier = s :=
rfl
#align lower_set.carrier_eq_coe LowerSet.carrier_eq_coe
@[simp] protected lemma lower (s : LowerSet α) : IsLowerSet (s : Set α) := s.lower'
#align lower_set.lower LowerSet.lower
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mk (s : Set α) (hs) : mk s hs = s := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_mk {s : Set α} (hs) {a : α} : a ∈ mk s hs ↔ a ∈ s := Iff.rfl
#align lower_set.mem_mk LowerSet.mem_mk
end LowerSet
/-! #### Order -/
namespace UpperSet
variable {S : Set (UpperSet α)} {s t : UpperSet α} {a : α}
instance : Sup (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∩ t, s.upper.inter t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Inf (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨s ∪ t, s.upper.union t.upper⟩⟩
instance : Top (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨∅, isUpperSet_empty⟩⟩
instance : Bot (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⟨univ, isUpperSet_univ⟩⟩
instance : SupSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iInter₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance : InfSet (UpperSet α) :=
⟨fun S => ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s, isUpperSet_iUnion₂ fun s _ => s.upper⟩⟩
instance completelyDistribLattice : CompletelyDistribLattice (UpperSet α) :=
(toDual.injective.comp SetLike.coe_injective).completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
instance : Inhabited (UpperSet α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
@[simp 1100, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊆ t ↔ t ≤ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.coe_subset_coe UpperSet.coe_subset_coe
@[simp 1100, norm_cast] lemma coe_ssubset_coe : (s : Set α) ⊂ t ↔ t < s := Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_top : ((⊤ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_top UpperSet.coe_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : UpperSet α) : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_bot UpperSet.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_univ : (s : Set α) = univ ↔ s = ⊥ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_univ UpperSet.coe_eq_univ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ⊤ := by simp [SetLike.ext'_iff]
#align upper_set.coe_eq_empty UpperSet.coe_eq_empty
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_nonempty : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ⊤ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans coe_eq_empty.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sup (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊔ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∩ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_sup UpperSet.coe_sup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inf (s t : UpperSet α) : (↑(s ⊓ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_inf UpperSet.coe_inf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sSup S) : Set α) = ⋂ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Sup UpperSet.coe_sSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf (S : Set (UpperSet α)) : (↑(sInf S) : Set α) = ⋃ s ∈ S, ↑s :=
rfl
#align upper_set.coe_Inf UpperSet.coe_sInf
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iSup (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨆ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋂ i, f i := by simp [iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr UpperSet.coe_iSup
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_iInf (f : ι → UpperSet α) : (↑(⨅ i, f i) : Set α) = ⋃ i, f i := by simp [iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi UpperSet.coe_iInf
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iSup₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋂ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iSup]
#align upper_set.coe_supr₂ UpperSet.coe_iSup₂
@[norm_cast] -- Porting note: no longer a `simp`
theorem coe_iInf₂ (f : ∀ i, κ i → UpperSet α) :
(↑(⨅ (i) (j), f i j) : Set α) = ⋃ (i) (j), f i j := by simp_rw [coe_iInf]
#align upper_set.coe_infi₂ UpperSet.coe_iInf₂
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_top : a ∉ (⊤ : UpperSet α) :=
id
#align upper_set.not_mem_top UpperSet.not_mem_top
@[simp]
theorem mem_bot : a ∈ (⊥ : UpperSet α) :=
trivial
#align upper_set.mem_bot UpperSet.mem_bot
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup_iff : a ∈ s ⊔ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_inf_iff : a ∈ s ⊓ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align upper_set.mem_inf_iff UpperSet.mem_inf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sSup_iff : a ∈ sSup S ↔ ∀ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iInter₂
#align upper_set.mem_Sup_iff UpperSet.mem_sSup_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_sInf_iff : a ∈ sInf S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, a ∈ s :=
mem_iUnion₂.trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, SetLike.mem_coe]
#align upper_set.mem_Inf_iff UpperSet.mem_sInf_iff
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨆ i, f i) ↔ ∀ i, a ∈ f i := by
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iSup]
exact mem_iInter
#align upper_set.mem_supr_iff UpperSet.mem_iSup_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 677 | 679 | theorem mem_iInf_iff {f : ι → UpperSet α} : (a ∈ ⨅ i, f i) ↔ ∃ i, a ∈ f i := by |
rw [← SetLike.mem_coe, coe_iInf]
exact mem_iUnion
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Option
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fintype
#align_import group_theory.perm.fin from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7e1c1263b6a25eb90bf16e80d8f47a657e403c4c"
/-!
# Permutations of `Fin n`
-/
open Equiv
/-- Permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` are equivalent to fixing a single
`Fin (n + 1)` and permuting the remaining with a `Perm (Fin n)`.
The fixed `Fin (n + 1)` is swapped with `0`. -/
def Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin {n : ℕ} : Perm (Fin n.succ) ≃ Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n) :=
((Equiv.permCongr <| finSuccEquiv n).trans Equiv.Perm.decomposeOption).trans
(Equiv.prodCongr (finSuccEquiv n).symm (Equiv.refl _))
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, Equiv.refl _) = swap 0 p := by
simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Equiv.permCongr_def]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_refl Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, 1) = swap 0 p :=
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_refl p
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_of_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_of_one
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 0 = p := by simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_zero Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_zero
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin n)) (p : Fin (n + 1))
(x : Fin n) : Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) x.succ = swap 0 p (e x).succ := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p
· simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· intro i
by_cases h : i = e x
· simp [h, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map]
· simp [h, Fin.succ_ne_zero, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, EquivFunctor.map,
swap_apply_def, Ne.symm h]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_succ Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma.
See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12232 -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one {n : ℕ} (e : Perm (Fin (n + 1))) (p : Fin (n + 2)) :
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e) 1 = swap 0 p (e 0).succ := by
rw [← Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ e p 0]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin_symm_apply_one Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin_symm_apply_one
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign {n : ℕ} (p : Fin (n + 1)) (e : Perm (Fin n)) :
Perm.sign (Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm (p, e)) = ite (p = 0) 1 (-1) * Perm.sign e := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ p <;> simp [Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin, Fin.succ_ne_zero]
#align equiv.perm.decompose_fin.symm_sign Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm_sign
/-- The set of all permutations of `Fin (n + 1)` can be constructed by augmenting the set of
permutations of `Fin n` by each element of `Fin (n + 1)` in turn. -/
theorem Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ {n : ℕ} :
@Finset.univ (Perm <| Fin n.succ) _ =
(Finset.univ : Finset <| Fin n.succ × Perm (Fin n)).map
Equiv.Perm.decomposeFin.symm.toEmbedding :=
(Finset.univ_map_equiv_to_embedding _).symm
#align finset.univ_perm_fin_succ Finset.univ_perm_fin_succ
section CycleRange
/-! ### `cycleRange` section
Define the permutations `Fin.cycleRange i`, the cycle `(0 1 2 ... i)`.
-/
open Equiv.Perm
-- Porting note: renamed from finRotate_succ because there is already a theorem with that name
theorem finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin {n : ℕ} :
finRotate n.succ = decomposeFin.symm (1, finRotate n) := by
ext i
cases n; · simp
refine Fin.cases ?_ (fun i => ?_) i
· simp
rw [coe_finRotate, decomposeFin_symm_apply_succ, if_congr i.succ_eq_last_succ rfl rfl]
split_ifs with h
· simp [h]
· rw [Fin.val_succ, Function.Injective.map_swap Fin.val_injective, Fin.val_succ, coe_finRotate,
if_neg h, Fin.val_zero, Fin.val_one,
swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne (Nat.succ_ne_zero _) (Nat.succ_succ_ne_one _)]
#align fin_rotate_succ finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin
@[simp]
theorem sign_finRotate (n : ℕ) : Perm.sign (finRotate (n + 1)) = (-1) ^ n := by
induction' n with n ih
· simp
· rw [finRotate_succ_eq_decomposeFin]
simp [ih, pow_succ]
#align sign_fin_rotate sign_finRotate
@[simp]
theorem support_finRotate {n : ℕ} : support (finRotate (n + 2)) = Finset.univ := by
ext
simp
#align support_fin_rotate support_finRotate
theorem support_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : support (finRotate n) = Finset.univ := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, support_finRotate]
#align support_fin_rotate_of_le support_finRotate_of_le
theorem isCycle_finRotate {n : ℕ} : IsCycle (finRotate (n + 2)) := by
refine ⟨0, by simp, fun x hx' => ⟨x, ?_⟩⟩
clear hx'
cases' x with x hx
rw [zpow_natCast, Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_mk]
induction' x with x ih; · rfl
rw [pow_succ', Perm.mul_apply, coe_finRotate_of_ne_last, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx)]
rw [Ne, Fin.ext_iff, ih (lt_trans x.lt_succ_self hx), Fin.val_last]
exact ne_of_lt (Nat.lt_of_succ_lt_succ hx)
#align is_cycle_fin_rotate isCycle_finRotate
theorem isCycle_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : IsCycle (finRotate n) := by
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm]
exact isCycle_finRotate
#align is_cycle_fin_rotate_of_le isCycle_finRotate_of_le
@[simp]
theorem cycleType_finRotate {n : ℕ} : cycleType (finRotate (n + 2)) = {n + 2} := by
rw [isCycle_finRotate.cycleType, support_finRotate, ← Fintype.card, Fintype.card_fin]
rfl
#align cycle_type_fin_rotate cycleType_finRotate
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Fin.lean | 151 | 153 | theorem cycleType_finRotate_of_le {n : ℕ} (h : 2 ≤ n) : cycleType (finRotate n) = {n} := by |
obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, cycleType_finRotate]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Chris Hughes, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units
#align_import algebra.hom.units from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
/-!
# Monoid homomorphisms and units
This file allows to lift monoid homomorphisms to group homomorphisms of their units subgroups. It
also contains unrelated results about `Units` that depend on `MonoidHom`.
## Main declarations
* `Units.map`: Turn a homomorphism from `α` to `β` monoids into a homomorphism from `αˣ` to `βˣ`.
* `MonoidHom.toHomUnits`: Turn a homomorphism from a group `α` to `β` into a homomorphism from
`α` to `βˣ`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
open Function
universe u v w
section MonoidHomClass
/-- If two homomorphisms from a division monoid to a monoid are equal at a unit `x`, then they are
equal at `x⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"If two homomorphisms from a subtraction monoid to an additive monoid are equal at an
additive unit `x`, then they are equal at `-x`."]
theorem IsUnit.eq_on_inv {F G N} [DivisionMonoid G] [Monoid N] [FunLike F G N]
[MonoidHomClass F G N] {x : G} (hx : IsUnit x) (f g : F) (h : f x = g x) : f x⁻¹ = g x⁻¹ :=
left_inv_eq_right_inv (map_mul_eq_one f hx.inv_mul_cancel)
(h.symm ▸ map_mul_eq_one g (hx.mul_inv_cancel))
#align is_unit.eq_on_inv IsUnit.eq_on_inv
#align is_add_unit.eq_on_neg IsAddUnit.eq_on_neg
/-- If two homomorphism from a group to a monoid are equal at `x`, then they are equal at `x⁻¹`. -/
@[to_additive
"If two homomorphism from an additive group to an additive monoid are equal at `x`,
then they are equal at `-x`."]
theorem eq_on_inv {F G M} [Group G] [Monoid M] [FunLike F G M] [MonoidHomClass F G M]
(f g : F) {x : G} (h : f x = g x) : f x⁻¹ = g x⁻¹ :=
(Group.isUnit x).eq_on_inv f g h
#align eq_on_inv eq_on_inv
#align eq_on_neg eq_on_neg
end MonoidHomClass
namespace Units
variable {α : Type*} {M : Type u} {N : Type v} {P : Type w} [Monoid M] [Monoid N] [Monoid P]
/-- The group homomorphism on units induced by a `MonoidHom`. -/
@[to_additive "The additive homomorphism on `AddUnit`s induced by an `AddMonoidHom`."]
def map (f : M →* N) : Mˣ →* Nˣ :=
MonoidHom.mk'
(fun u => ⟨f u.val, f u.inv,
by rw [← f.map_mul, u.val_inv, f.map_one],
by rw [← f.map_mul, u.inv_val, f.map_one]⟩)
fun x y => ext (f.map_mul x y)
#align units.map Units.map
#align add_units.map AddUnits.map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map (f : M →* N) (x : Mˣ) : ↑(map f x) = f x := rfl
#align units.coe_map Units.coe_map
#align add_units.coe_map AddUnits.coe_map
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_map_inv (f : M →* N) (u : Mˣ) : ↑(map f u)⁻¹ = f ↑u⁻¹ := rfl
#align units.coe_map_inv Units.coe_map_inv
#align add_units.coe_map_neg AddUnits.coe_map_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_comp (f : M →* N) (g : N →* P) : map (g.comp f) = (map g).comp (map f) := rfl
#align units.map_comp Units.map_comp
#align add_units.map_comp AddUnits.map_comp
@[to_additive]
lemma map_injective {f : M →* N} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (map f) := fun _ _ e => ext (hf (congr_arg val e))
variable (M)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_id : map (MonoidHom.id M) = MonoidHom.id Mˣ := by ext; rfl
#align units.map_id Units.map_id
#align add_units.map_id AddUnits.map_id
/-- Coercion `Mˣ → M` as a monoid homomorphism. -/
@[to_additive "Coercion `AddUnits M → M` as an AddMonoid homomorphism."]
def coeHom : Mˣ →* M where
toFun := Units.val; map_one' := val_one; map_mul' := val_mul
#align units.coe_hom Units.coeHom
#align add_units.coe_hom AddUnits.coeHom
variable {M}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coeHom_apply (x : Mˣ) : coeHom M x = ↑x := rfl
#align units.coe_hom_apply Units.coeHom_apply
#align add_units.coe_hom_apply AddUnits.coeHom_apply
section DivisionMonoid
variable [DivisionMonoid α]
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast)]
theorem val_zpow_eq_zpow_val : ∀ (u : αˣ) (n : ℤ), ((u ^ n : αˣ) : α) = (u : α) ^ n :=
(Units.coeHom α).map_zpow
#align units.coe_zpow Units.val_zpow_eq_zpow_val
#align add_units.coe_zsmul AddUnits.val_zsmul_eq_zsmul_val
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem _root_.map_units_inv {F : Type*} [FunLike F M α] [MonoidHomClass F M α]
(f : F) (u : Units M) :
f ↑u⁻¹ = (f u)⁻¹ := ((f : M →* α).comp (Units.coeHom M)).map_inv u
#align map_units_inv map_units_inv
#align map_add_units_neg map_addUnits_neg
end DivisionMonoid
/-- If a map `g : M → Nˣ` agrees with a homomorphism `f : M →* N`, then
this map is a monoid homomorphism too. -/
@[to_additive
"If a map `g : M → AddUnits N` agrees with a homomorphism `f : M →+ N`, then this map
is an AddMonoid homomorphism too."]
def liftRight (f : M →* N) (g : M → Nˣ) (h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) : M →* Nˣ where
toFun := g
map_one' := by ext; rw [h 1]; exact f.map_one
map_mul' x y := Units.ext <| by simp only [h, val_mul, f.map_mul]
#align units.lift_right Units.liftRight
#align add_units.lift_right AddUnits.liftRight
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_liftRight {f : M →* N} {g : M → Nˣ} (h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) :
(liftRight f g h x : N) = f x := h x
#align units.coe_lift_right Units.coe_liftRight
#align add_units.coe_lift_right AddUnits.coe_liftRight
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mul_liftRight_inv {f : M →* N} {g : M → Nˣ} (h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) :
f x * ↑(liftRight f g h x)⁻¹ = 1 := by
rw [Units.mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul, one_mul, coe_liftRight]
#align units.mul_lift_right_inv Units.mul_liftRight_inv
#align add_units.add_lift_right_neg AddUnits.add_liftRight_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem liftRight_inv_mul {f : M →* N} {g : M → Nˣ} (h : ∀ x, ↑(g x) = f x) (x) :
↑(liftRight f g h x)⁻¹ * f x = 1 := by
rw [Units.inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul, mul_one, coe_liftRight]
#align units.lift_right_inv_mul Units.liftRight_inv_mul
#align add_units.lift_right_neg_add AddUnits.liftRight_neg_add
end Units
namespace MonoidHom
/-- If `f` is a homomorphism from a group `G` to a monoid `M`,
then its image lies in the units of `M`,
and `f.toHomUnits` is the corresponding monoid homomorphism from `G` to `Mˣ`. -/
@[to_additive
"If `f` is a homomorphism from an additive group `G` to an additive monoid `M`,
then its image lies in the `AddUnits` of `M`,
and `f.toHomUnits` is the corresponding homomorphism from `G` to `AddUnits M`."]
def toHomUnits {G M : Type*} [Group G] [Monoid M] (f : G →* M) : G →* Mˣ :=
Units.liftRight f (fun g => ⟨f g, f g⁻¹, map_mul_eq_one f (mul_inv_self _),
map_mul_eq_one f (inv_mul_self _)⟩)
fun _ => rfl
#align monoid_hom.to_hom_units MonoidHom.toHomUnits
#align add_monoid_hom.to_hom_add_units AddMonoidHom.toHomAddUnits
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_toHomUnits {G M : Type*} [Group G] [Monoid M] (f : G →* M) (g : G) :
(f.toHomUnits g : M) = f g := rfl
#align monoid_hom.coe_to_hom_units MonoidHom.coe_toHomUnits
#align add_monoid_hom.coe_to_hom_add_units AddMonoidHom.coe_toHomAddUnits
end MonoidHom
namespace IsUnit
variable {F G α M N : Type*} [FunLike F M N] [FunLike G N M]
section Monoid
variable [Monoid M] [Monoid N]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Units/Hom.lean | 198 | 199 | theorem map [MonoidHomClass F M N] (f : F) {x : M} (h : IsUnit x) : IsUnit (f x) := by |
rcases h with ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact (Units.map (f : M →* N) y).isUnit
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bitwise
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PSub
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Size
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Bitwise
#align_import data.num.lemmas from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Properties of the binary representation of integers
-/
/-
Porting note:
`bit0` and `bit1` are deprecated because it is mainly used to represent number literal in Lean3 but
not in Lean4 anymore. However, this file uses them for encoding numbers so this linter is
unnecessary.
-/
set_option linter.deprecated false
-- Porting note: Required for the notation `-[n+1]`.
open Int Function
attribute [local simp] add_assoc
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : PosNum) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one PosNum.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' [One α] [Add α] : (PosNum.one : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_one' PosNum.cast_one'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit0 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit0 PosNum.cast_bit0
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_bit1 [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (n.bit1 : α) = _root_.bit1 (n : α) :=
rfl
#align pos_num.cast_bit1 PosNum.cast_bit1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 1 => Nat.cast_one
| bit0 p => (Nat.cast_bit0 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit0 p.cast_to_nat
| bit1 p => (Nat.cast_bit1 _).trans <| congr_arg _root_.bit1 p.cast_to_nat
#align pos_num.cast_to_nat PosNum.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align pos_num.to_nat_to_int PosNum.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_to_int PosNum.cast_to_int
theorem succ_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => rfl
| bit1 p =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit0 (succ_to_nat p)).trans <|
show ↑p + 1 + ↑p + 1 = ↑p + ↑p + 1 + 1 by simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.succ_to_nat PosNum.succ_to_nat
theorem one_add (n : PosNum) : 1 + n = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.one_add PosNum.one_add
theorem add_one (n : PosNum) : n + 1 = succ n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.add_one PosNum.add_one
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m + n
| 1, b => by rw [one_add b, succ_to_nat, add_comm, cast_one]
| a, 1 => by rw [add_one a, succ_to_nat, cast_one]
| bit0 a, bit0 b => (congr_arg _root_.bit0 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <| add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _
| bit0 a, bit1 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + (b + b + 1) by simp [add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit0 b =>
(congr_arg _root_.bit1 (add_to_nat a b)).trans <|
show (a + b + (a + b) + 1 : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b) by simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
| bit1 a, bit1 b =>
show (succ (a + b) + succ (a + b) : ℕ) = a + a + 1 + (b + b + 1) by
rw [succ_to_nat, add_to_nat a b]; simp [add_left_comm]
#align pos_num.add_to_nat PosNum.add_to_nat
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : PosNum, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 1, b => by simp [one_add]
| bit0 a, 1 => congr_arg bit0 (add_one a)
| bit1 a, 1 => congr_arg bit1 (add_one a)
| bit0 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit0 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit0 (add_succ a b)
| bit1 a, bit0 b => rfl
| bit1 a, bit1 b => congr_arg bit1 (add_succ a b)
#align pos_num.add_succ PosNum.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n, _root_.bit0 n = bit0 n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 p => congr_arg bit0 (bit0_of_bit0 p)
| bit1 p => show bit0 (succ (_root_.bit0 p)) = _ by rw [bit0_of_bit0 p, succ]
#align pos_num.bit0_of_bit0 PosNum.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 (n : PosNum) : _root_.bit1 n = bit1 n :=
show _root_.bit0 n + 1 = bit1 n by rw [add_one, bit0_of_bit0, succ]
#align pos_num.bit1_of_bit1 PosNum.bit1_of_bit1
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat (m) : ∀ n, ((m * n : PosNum) : ℕ) = m * n
| 1 => (mul_one _).symm
| bit0 p => show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
| bit1 p =>
(add_to_nat (bit0 (m * p)) m).trans <|
show (↑(m * p) + ↑(m * p) + ↑m : ℕ) = ↑m * (p + p) + m by rw [mul_to_nat m p, left_distrib]
#align pos_num.mul_to_nat PosNum.mul_to_nat
theorem to_nat_pos : ∀ n : PosNum, 0 < (n : ℕ)
| 1 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| bit0 p =>
let h := to_nat_pos p
add_pos h h
| bit1 _p => Nat.succ_pos _
#align pos_num.to_nat_pos PosNum.to_nat_pos
theorem cmp_to_nat_lemma {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n → (bit1 m : ℕ) < bit0 n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n → (m + m + 1 + 1 : ℕ) ≤ n + n by
intro h; rw [Nat.add_right_comm m m 1, add_assoc]; exact Nat.add_le_add h h
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat_lemma PosNum.cmp_to_nat_lemma
theorem cmp_swap (m) : ∀ n, (cmp m n).swap = cmp n m := by
induction' m with m IH m IH <;> intro n <;> cases' n with n n <;> unfold cmp <;>
try { rfl } <;> rw [← IH] <;> cases cmp m n <;> rfl
#align pos_num.cmp_swap PosNum.cmp_swap
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 1, 1 => rfl
| bit0 a, 1 =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ a := to_nat_pos a
Nat.add_le_add h h
| bit1 a, 1 => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 a
| 1, bit0 b =>
let h : (1 : ℕ) ≤ b := to_nat_pos b
Nat.add_le_add h h
| 1, bit1 b => Nat.succ_lt_succ <| to_nat_pos <| bit0 b
| bit0 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.add_lt_add this this
| bit0 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
| bit1 a, bit0 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact cmp_to_nat_lemma this
· rw [this]
apply Nat.lt_succ_self
· exact Nat.le_succ_of_le (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
| bit1 a, bit1 b => by
dsimp [cmp]
have := cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; cases cmp a b <;> dsimp <;> intro this
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
· rw [this]
· exact Nat.succ_lt_succ (Nat.add_lt_add this this)
#align pos_num.cmp_to_nat PosNum.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align pos_num.lt_to_nat PosNum.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align pos_num.le_to_nat PosNum.le_to_nat
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem add_zero (n : Num) : n + 0 = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.add_zero Num.add_zero
theorem zero_add (n : Num) : 0 + n = n := by cases n <;> rfl
#align num.zero_add Num.zero_add
theorem add_one : ∀ n : Num, n + 1 = succ n
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => by cases p <;> rfl
#align num.add_one Num.add_one
theorem add_succ : ∀ m n : Num, m + succ n = succ (m + n)
| 0, n => by simp [zero_add]
| pos p, 0 => show pos (p + 1) = succ (pos p + 0) by rw [PosNum.add_one, add_zero, succ, succ']
| pos p, pos q => congr_arg pos (PosNum.add_succ _ _)
#align num.add_succ Num.add_succ
theorem bit0_of_bit0 : ∀ n : Num, bit0 n = n.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit0_of_bit0
#align num.bit0_of_bit0 Num.bit0_of_bit0
theorem bit1_of_bit1 : ∀ n : Num, bit1 n = n.bit1
| 0 => rfl
| pos p => congr_arg pos p.bit1_of_bit1
#align num.bit1_of_bit1 Num.bit1_of_bit1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_zero : Num.ofNat' 0 = 0 := by simp [Num.ofNat']
#align num.of_nat'_zero Num.ofNat'_zero
theorem ofNat'_bit (b n) : ofNat' (Nat.bit b n) = cond b Num.bit1 Num.bit0 (ofNat' n) :=
Nat.binaryRec_eq rfl _ _
#align num.of_nat'_bit Num.ofNat'_bit
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_one : Num.ofNat' 1 = 1 := by erw [ofNat'_bit true 0, cond, ofNat'_zero]; rfl
#align num.of_nat'_one Num.ofNat'_one
theorem bit1_succ : ∀ n : Num, n.bit1.succ = n.succ.bit0
| 0 => rfl
| pos _n => rfl
#align num.bit1_succ Num.bit1_succ
theorem ofNat'_succ : ∀ {n}, ofNat' (n + 1) = ofNat' n + 1 :=
@(Nat.binaryRec (by simp [zero_add]) fun b n ih => by
cases b
· erw [ofNat'_bit true n, ofNat'_bit]
simp only [← bit1_of_bit1, ← bit0_of_bit0, cond, _root_.bit1]
-- Porting note: `cc` was not ported yet so `exact Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1` is used.
· erw [show n.bit true + 1 = (n + 1).bit false by
simpa [Nat.bit, _root_.bit1, _root_.bit0] using Nat.add_left_comm n 1 1,
ofNat'_bit, ofNat'_bit, ih]
simp only [cond, add_one, bit1_succ])
#align num.of_nat'_succ Num.ofNat'_succ
@[simp]
theorem add_ofNat' (m n) : Num.ofNat' (m + n) = Num.ofNat' m + Num.ofNat' n := by
induction n
· simp only [Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_zero, add_zero]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ, Nat.add_zero, ofNat'_succ, add_one, add_succ, *]
#align num.add_of_nat' Num.add_ofNat'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((0 : Num) : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero Num.cast_zero
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero' [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : (Num.zero : α) = 0 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_zero' Num.cast_zero'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] : ((1 : Num) : α) = 1 :=
rfl
#align num.cast_one Num.cast_one
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [Zero α] [One α] [Add α] (n : PosNum) : (Num.pos n : α) = n :=
rfl
#align num.cast_pos Num.cast_pos
theorem succ'_to_nat : ∀ n, (succ' n : ℕ) = n + 1
| 0 => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p => PosNum.succ_to_nat _
#align num.succ'_to_nat Num.succ'_to_nat
theorem succ_to_nat (n) : (succ n : ℕ) = n + 1 :=
succ'_to_nat n
#align num.succ_to_nat Num.succ_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_nat [AddMonoidWithOne α] : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : α) = n
| 0 => Nat.cast_zero
| pos p => p.cast_to_nat
#align num.cast_to_nat Num.cast_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem add_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m + n : Num) : ℕ) = m + n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (Nat.zero_add _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.add_to_nat _ _
#align num.add_to_nat Num.add_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem mul_to_nat : ∀ m n, ((m * n : Num) : ℕ) = m * n
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos _q => (zero_mul _).symm
| pos _p, 0 => rfl
| pos _p, pos _q => PosNum.mul_to_nat _ _
#align num.mul_to_nat Num.mul_to_nat
theorem cmp_to_nat : ∀ m n, (Ordering.casesOn (cmp m n) ((m : ℕ) < n) (m = n) ((n : ℕ) < m) : Prop)
| 0, 0 => rfl
| 0, pos b => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, 0 => to_nat_pos _
| pos a, pos b => by
have := PosNum.cmp_to_nat a b; revert this; dsimp [cmp]; cases PosNum.cmp a b
exacts [id, congr_arg pos, id]
#align num.cmp_to_nat Num.cmp_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem lt_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) < n ↔ m < n :=
show (m : ℕ) < n ↔ cmp m n = Ordering.lt from
match cmp m n, cmp_to_nat m n with
| Ordering.lt, h => by simp only at h; simp [h]
| Ordering.eq, h => by simp only at h; simp [h, lt_irrefl]
| Ordering.gt, h => by simp [not_lt_of_gt h]
#align num.lt_to_nat Num.lt_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem le_to_nat {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr lt_to_nat
#align num.le_to_nat Num.le_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
@[simp]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : PosNum, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = Num.pos n
| 1 => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true 0, Num.ofNat'_zero]; rfl
| bit0 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit false, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
| bit1 p => by erw [@Num.ofNat'_bit true, of_to_nat' p]; rfl
#align pos_num.of_to_nat' PosNum.of_to_nat'
end PosNum
namespace Num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat' : ∀ n : Num, Num.ofNat' (n : ℕ) = n
| 0 => ofNat'_zero
| pos p => p.of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat' Num.of_to_nat'
lemma toNat_injective : Injective (castNum : Num → ℕ) := LeftInverse.injective of_to_nat'
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : Num} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n := toNat_injective.eq_iff
#align num.to_nat_inj Num.to_nat_inj
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `Num`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `Num`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world and
then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : Num) (m : Num) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp))
instance addMonoid : AddMonoid Num where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
zero_add := zero_add
add_zero := add_zero
add_assoc := by transfer
nsmul := nsmulRec
#align num.add_monoid Num.addMonoid
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Num :=
{ Num.addMonoid with
natCast := Num.ofNat'
one := 1
natCast_zero := ofNat'_zero
natCast_succ := fun _ => ofNat'_succ }
#align num.add_monoid_with_one Num.addMonoidWithOne
instance commSemiring : CommSemiring Num where
__ := Num.addMonoid
__ := Num.addMonoidWithOne
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec Num ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_zero _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, mul_zero]
zero_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_zero, zero_mul]
mul_one _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, mul_one]
one_mul _ := by rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, cast_one, one_mul]
add_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, add_to_nat, add_comm]
mul_comm _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_comm]
mul_assoc _ _ _ := by simp_rw [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, mul_assoc]
left_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, mul_add]
right_distrib _ _ _ := by simp only [← to_nat_inj, mul_to_nat, add_to_nat, add_mul]
#align num.comm_semiring Num.commSemiring
instance orderedCancelAddCommMonoid : OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid Num where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by simp only [← lt_to_nat, ← le_to_nat, lt_iff_le_not_le]
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by transfer_rw; apply le_antisymm
add_le_add_left a b h c := by revert h; transfer_rw; exact fun h => add_le_add_left h c
le_of_add_le_add_left a b c := by transfer_rw; apply le_of_add_le_add_left
#align num.ordered_cancel_add_comm_monoid Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid
instance linearOrderedSemiring : LinearOrderedSemiring Num :=
{ Num.commSemiring,
Num.orderedCancelAddCommMonoid with
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
zero_le_one := by decide
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right
decidableLT := Num.decidableLT
decidableLE := Num.decidableLE
-- This is relying on an automatically generated instance name,
-- generated in a `deriving` handler.
-- See https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2343
decidableEq := instDecidableEqNum
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by decide⟩ }
#align num.linear_ordered_semiring Num.linearOrderedSemiring
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem add_of_nat (m n) : ((m + n : ℕ) : Num) = m + n :=
add_ofNat' _ _
#align num.add_of_nat Num.add_of_nat
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem to_nat_to_int (n : Num) : ((n : ℕ) : ℤ) = n :=
cast_to_nat _
#align num.to_nat_to_int Num.to_nat_to_int
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_to_int {α} [AddGroupWithOne α] (n : Num) : ((n : ℤ) : α) = n := by
rw [← to_nat_to_int, Int.cast_natCast, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_to_int Num.cast_to_int
theorem to_of_nat : ∀ n : ℕ, ((n : Num) : ℕ) = n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, cast_zero]
| n + 1 => by rw [Nat.cast_succ, add_one, succ_to_nat, to_of_nat n]
#align num.to_of_nat Num.to_of_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem of_natCast {α} [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : ℕ) : ((n : Num) : α) = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, to_of_nat]
#align num.of_nat_cast Num.of_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias of_nat_cast := of_natCast
@[norm_cast] -- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem of_nat_inj {m n : ℕ} : (m : Num) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Function.LeftInverse.injective to_of_nat h, congr_arg _⟩
#align num.of_nat_inj Num.of_nat_inj
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : Num, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = n :=
of_to_nat'
#align num.of_to_nat Num.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat (m n : Num) : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
⟨fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by rw [← of_to_nat n, e]; simp⟩, fun ⟨k, e⟩ => ⟨k, by simp [e, mul_to_nat]⟩⟩
#align num.dvd_to_nat Num.dvd_to_nat
end Num
namespace PosNum
variable {α : Type*}
open Num
-- Porting note: The priority should be `high`er than `cast_to_nat`.
@[simp high, norm_cast]
theorem of_to_nat : ∀ n : PosNum, ((n : ℕ) : Num) = Num.pos n :=
of_to_nat'
#align pos_num.of_to_nat PosNum.of_to_nat
@[norm_cast]
theorem to_nat_inj {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) = n ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun h => Num.pos.inj <| by rw [← PosNum.of_to_nat, ← PosNum.of_to_nat, h], congr_arg _⟩
#align pos_num.to_nat_inj PosNum.to_nat_inj
theorem pred'_to_nat : ∀ n, (pred' n : ℕ) = Nat.pred n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n =>
have : Nat.succ ↑(pred' n) = ↑n := by
rw [pred'_to_nat n, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos n)]
match (motive :=
∀ k : Num, Nat.succ ↑k = ↑n → ↑(Num.casesOn k 1 bit1 : PosNum) = Nat.pred (_root_.bit0 n))
pred' n, this with
| 0, (h : ((1 : Num) : ℕ) = n) => by rw [← to_nat_inj.1 h]; rfl
| Num.pos p, (h : Nat.succ ↑p = n) => by rw [← h]; exact (Nat.succ_add p p).symm
| bit1 n => rfl
#align pos_num.pred'_to_nat PosNum.pred'_to_nat
@[simp]
theorem pred'_succ' (n) : pred' (succ' n) = n :=
Num.to_nat_inj.1 <| by rw [pred'_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.pred_succ]
#align pos_num.pred'_succ' PosNum.pred'_succ'
@[simp]
theorem succ'_pred' (n) : succ' (pred' n) = n :=
to_nat_inj.1 <| by
rw [succ'_to_nat, pred'_to_nat, Nat.add_one, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos (to_nat_pos _)]
#align pos_num.succ'_pred' PosNum.succ'_pred'
instance dvd : Dvd PosNum :=
⟨fun m n => pos m ∣ pos n⟩
#align pos_num.has_dvd PosNum.dvd
@[norm_cast]
theorem dvd_to_nat {m n : PosNum} : (m : ℕ) ∣ n ↔ m ∣ n :=
Num.dvd_to_nat (pos m) (pos n)
#align pos_num.dvd_to_nat PosNum.dvd_to_nat
theorem size_to_nat : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = Nat.size n
| 1 => Nat.size_one.symm
| bit0 n => by
rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit0, Nat.size_bit0 <| ne_of_gt <| to_nat_pos n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, size_to_nat n, cast_bit1, Nat.size_bit1]
#align pos_num.size_to_nat PosNum.size_to_nat
theorem size_eq_natSize : ∀ n, (size n : ℕ) = natSize n
| 1 => rfl
| bit0 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
| bit1 n => by rw [size, succ_to_nat, natSize, size_eq_natSize n]
#align pos_num.size_eq_nat_size PosNum.size_eq_natSize
theorem natSize_to_nat (n) : natSize n = Nat.size n := by rw [← size_eq_natSize, size_to_nat]
#align pos_num.nat_size_to_nat PosNum.natSize_to_nat
theorem natSize_pos (n) : 0 < natSize n := by cases n <;> apply Nat.succ_pos
#align pos_num.nat_size_pos PosNum.natSize_pos
/-- This tactic tries to turn an (in)equality about `PosNum`s to one about `Nat`s by rewriting.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by
transfer_rw
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer_rw) "transfer_rw" : tactic => `(tactic|
(repeat first | rw [← to_nat_inj] | rw [← lt_to_nat] | rw [← le_to_nat]
repeat first | rw [add_to_nat] | rw [mul_to_nat] | rw [cast_one] | rw [cast_zero]))
/--
This tactic tries to prove (in)equalities about `PosNum`s by transferring them to the `Nat` world
and then trying to call `simp`.
```lean
example (n : PosNum) (m : PosNum) : n ≤ n + m := by transfer
```
-/
scoped macro (name := transfer) "transfer" : tactic => `(tactic|
(intros; transfer_rw; try simp [add_comm, add_left_comm, mul_comm, mul_left_comm]))
instance addCommSemigroup : AddCommSemigroup PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
add_assoc := by transfer
add_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.add_comm_semigroup PosNum.addCommSemigroup
instance commMonoid : CommMonoid PosNum where
mul := (· * ·)
one := (1 : PosNum)
npow := @npowRec PosNum ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
mul_assoc := by transfer
one_mul := by transfer
mul_one := by transfer
mul_comm := by transfer
#align pos_num.comm_monoid PosNum.commMonoid
instance distrib : Distrib PosNum where
add := (· + ·)
mul := (· * ·)
left_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add]
right_distrib := by transfer; simp [mul_add, mul_comm]
#align pos_num.distrib PosNum.distrib
instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PosNum where
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply lt_iff_le_not_le
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl := by transfer
le_trans := by
intro a b c
transfer_rw
apply le_trans
le_antisymm := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_antisymm
le_total := by
intro a b
transfer_rw
apply le_total
decidableLT := by infer_instance
decidableLE := by infer_instance
decidableEq := by infer_instance
#align pos_num.linear_order PosNum.linearOrder
@[simp]
theorem cast_to_num (n : PosNum) : ↑n = Num.pos n := by rw [← cast_to_nat, ← of_to_nat n]
#align pos_num.cast_to_num PosNum.cast_to_num
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> rfl
#align pos_num.bit_to_nat PosNum.bit_to_nat
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [AddMonoidWithOne α] (m n) : ((m + n : PosNum) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_add PosNum.cast_add
@[simp 500, norm_cast]
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n : PosNum) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← add_one, cast_add, cast_one]
#align pos_num.cast_succ PosNum.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_inj [AddMonoidWithOne α] [CharZero α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) = n ↔ m = n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_inj, to_nat_inj]
#align pos_num.cast_inj PosNum.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem one_le_cast [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : (1 : α) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, ← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le (α := α)]; apply to_nat_pos
#align pos_num.one_le_cast PosNum.one_le_cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_pos [LinearOrderedSemiring α] (n : PosNum) : 0 < (n : α) :=
lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (one_le_cast n)
#align pos_num.cast_pos PosNum.cast_pos
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_mul [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m * n : PosNum) : α) = m * n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, mul_to_nat, Nat.cast_mul, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_mul PosNum.cast_mul
@[simp]
theorem cmp_eq (m n) : cmp m n = Ordering.eq ↔ m = n := by
have := cmp_to_nat m n
-- Porting note: `cases` didn't rewrite at `this`, so `revert` & `intro` are required.
revert this; cases cmp m n <;> intro this <;> simp at this ⊢ <;> try { exact this } <;>
simp [show m ≠ n from fun e => by rw [e] at this;exact lt_irrefl _ this]
#align pos_num.cmp_eq PosNum.cmp_eq
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_lt [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) < n ↔ m < n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat m, ← cast_to_nat n, Nat.cast_lt (α := α), lt_to_nat]
#align pos_num.cast_lt PosNum.cast_lt
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le [LinearOrderedSemiring α] {m n : PosNum} : (m : α) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ n := by
rw [← not_lt]; exact not_congr cast_lt
#align pos_num.cast_le PosNum.cast_le
end PosNum
namespace Num
variable {α : Type*}
open PosNum
theorem bit_to_nat (b n) : (bit b n : ℕ) = Nat.bit b n := by cases b <;> cases n <;> rfl
#align num.bit_to_nat Num.bit_to_nat
theorem cast_succ' [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ' n : α) = n + 1 := by
rw [← PosNum.cast_to_nat, succ'_to_nat, Nat.cast_add_one, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_succ' Num.cast_succ'
theorem cast_succ [AddMonoidWithOne α] (n) : (succ n : α) = n + 1 :=
cast_succ' n
#align num.cast_succ Num.cast_succ
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add [Semiring α] (m n) : ((m + n : Num) : α) = m + n := by
rw [← cast_to_nat, add_to_nat, Nat.cast_add, cast_to_nat, cast_to_nat]
#align num.cast_add Num.cast_add
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Num/Lemmas.lean | 729 | 730 | theorem cast_bit0 [Semiring α] (n : Num) : (n.bit0 : α) = _root_.bit0 (n : α) := by |
rw [← bit0_of_bit0, _root_.bit0, cast_add]; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Finiteness
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Maps
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Defs
#align_import ring_theory.finiteness from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c813ed7de0f5115f956239124e9b30f3a621966f"
/-!
# Finiteness conditions in commutative algebra
In this file we define a notion of finiteness that is common in commutative algebra.
## Main declarations
- `Submodule.FG`, `Ideal.FG`
These express that some object is finitely generated as *submodule* over some base ring.
- `Module.Finite`, `RingHom.Finite`, `AlgHom.Finite`
all of these express that some object is finitely generated *as module* over some base ring.
## Main results
* `exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul` is Nakayama's lemma, in the following form:
if N is a finitely generated submodule of an ambient R-module M and I is an ideal of R
such that N ⊆ IN, then there exists r ∈ 1 + I such that rN = 0.
-/
open Function (Surjective)
namespace Submodule
variable {R : Type*} {M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
open Set
/-- A submodule of `M` is finitely generated if it is the span of a finite subset of `M`. -/
def FG (N : Submodule R M) : Prop :=
∃ S : Finset M, Submodule.span R ↑S = N
#align submodule.fg Submodule.FG
theorem fg_def {N : Submodule R M} : N.FG ↔ ∃ S : Set M, S.Finite ∧ span R S = N :=
⟨fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨_, Finset.finite_toSet t, h⟩, by
rintro ⟨t', h, rfl⟩
rcases Finite.exists_finset_coe h with ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_def Submodule.fg_def
theorem fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg (P : Submodule ℕ M) : P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubmonoid.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_nat_eq_addSubmonoid_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_submonoid_fg Submodule.fg_iff_addSubmonoid_fg
theorem fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] (P : Submodule ℤ G) :
P.FG ↔ P.toAddSubgroup.FG :=
⟨fun ⟨S, hS⟩ => ⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩, fun ⟨S, hS⟩ =>
⟨S, by simpa [← span_int_eq_addSubgroup_closure] using hS⟩⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg Submodule.fg_iff_add_subgroup_fg
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : Submodule R M} :
N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), span R (range s) = N := by
rw [fg_def]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
exact ⟨range s, finite_range s, hs⟩
#align submodule.fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family Submodule.fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family
/-- **Nakayama's Lemma**. Atiyah-Macdonald 2.5, Eisenbud 4.7, Matsumura 2.2,
[Stacks 00DV](https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00DV) -/
theorem exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = (0 : M) := by
rw [fg_def] at hn
rcases hn with ⟨s, hfs, hs⟩
have : ∃ r : R, r - 1 ∈ I ∧ N ≤ (I • span R s).comap (LinearMap.lsmul R M r) ∧ s ⊆ N := by
refine ⟨1, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [sub_self]
exact I.zero_mem
· rw [hs]
intro n hn
rw [mem_comap]
change (1 : R) • n ∈ I • N
rw [one_smul]
exact hin hn
· rw [← span_le, hs]
clear hin hs
revert this
refine Set.Finite.dinduction_on _ hfs (fun H => ?_) @fun i s _ _ ih H => ?_
· rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, _⟩
refine ⟨r, hr1, fun n hn => ?_⟩
specialize hrn hn
rwa [mem_comap, span_empty, smul_bot, mem_bot] at hrn
apply ih
rcases H with ⟨r, hr1, hrn, hs⟩
rw [← Set.singleton_union, span_union, smul_sup] at hrn
rw [Set.insert_subset_iff] at hs
have : ∃ c : R, c - 1 ∈ I ∧ c • i ∈ I • span R s := by
specialize hrn hs.1
rw [mem_comap, mem_sup] at hrn
rcases hrn with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz⟩
dsimp at hyz
rw [mem_smul_span_singleton] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨c, hci, rfl⟩
use r - c
constructor
· rw [sub_right_comm]
exact I.sub_mem hr1 hci
· rw [sub_smul, ← hyz, add_sub_cancel_left]
exact hz
rcases this with ⟨c, hc1, hci⟩
refine ⟨c * r, ?_, ?_, hs.2⟩
· simpa only [mul_sub, mul_one, sub_add_sub_cancel] using I.add_mem (I.mul_mem_left c hr1) hc1
· intro n hn
specialize hrn hn
rw [mem_comap, mem_sup] at hrn
rcases hrn with ⟨y, hy, z, hz, hyz⟩
dsimp at hyz
rw [mem_smul_span_singleton] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨d, _, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_comap, LinearMap.lsmul_apply]
rw [mul_smul, ← hyz, smul_add, smul_smul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact add_mem (smul_mem _ _ hci) (smul_mem _ _ hz)
#align submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul Submodule.exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul
theorem exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {M : Type*}
[AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R) (N : Submodule R M) (hn : N.FG) (hin : N ≤ I • N) :
∃ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, r • n = n := by
obtain ⟨r, hr, hr'⟩ := exists_sub_one_mem_and_smul_eq_zero_of_fg_of_le_smul I N hn hin
exact ⟨-(r - 1), I.neg_mem hr, fun n hn => by simpa [sub_smul] using hr' n hn⟩
#align submodule.exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul Submodule.exists_mem_and_smul_eq_self_of_fg_of_le_smul
theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : Submodule R M).FG :=
⟨∅, by rw [Finset.coe_empty, span_empty]⟩
#align submodule.fg_bot Submodule.fg_bot
theorem _root_.Subalgebra.fg_bot_toSubmodule {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A]
[Algebra R A] : (⊥ : Subalgebra R A).toSubmodule.FG :=
⟨{1}, by simp [Algebra.toSubmodule_bot, one_eq_span]⟩
#align subalgebra.fg_bot_to_submodule Subalgebra.fg_bot_toSubmodule
theorem fg_unit {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (I : (Submodule R A)ˣ) :
(I : Submodule R A).FG := by
have : (1 : A) ∈ (I * ↑I⁻¹ : Submodule R A) := by
rw [I.mul_inv]
exact one_le.mp le_rfl
obtain ⟨T, T', hT, hT', one_mem⟩ := mem_span_mul_finite_of_mem_mul this
refine ⟨T, span_eq_of_le _ hT ?_⟩
rw [← one_mul I, ← mul_one (span R (T : Set A))]
conv_rhs => rw [← I.inv_mul, ← mul_assoc]
refine mul_le_mul_left (le_trans ?_ <| mul_le_mul_right <| span_le.mpr hT')
simp only [Units.val_one, span_mul_span]
rwa [one_le]
#align submodule.fg_unit Submodule.fg_unit
theorem fg_of_isUnit {R A : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {I : Submodule R A}
(hI : IsUnit I) : I.FG :=
fg_unit hI.unit
#align submodule.fg_of_is_unit Submodule.fg_of_isUnit
theorem fg_span {s : Set M} (hs : s.Finite) : FG (span R s) :=
⟨hs.toFinset, by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]⟩
#align submodule.fg_span Submodule.fg_span
theorem fg_span_singleton (x : M) : FG (R ∙ x) :=
fg_span (finite_singleton x)
#align submodule.fg_span_singleton Submodule.fg_span_singleton
theorem FG.sup {N₁ N₂ : Submodule R M} (hN₁ : N₁.FG) (hN₂ : N₂.FG) : (N₁ ⊔ N₂).FG :=
let ⟨t₁, ht₁⟩ := fg_def.1 hN₁
let ⟨t₂, ht₂⟩ := fg_def.1 hN₂
fg_def.2 ⟨t₁ ∪ t₂, ht₁.1.union ht₂.1, by rw [span_union, ht₁.2, ht₂.2]⟩
#align submodule.fg.sup Submodule.FG.sup
theorem fg_finset_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (N i).FG) :
(s.sup N).FG :=
Finset.sup_induction fg_bot (fun _ ha _ hb => ha.sup hb) h
#align submodule.fg_finset_sup Submodule.fg_finset_sup
theorem fg_biSup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, (N i).FG) :
(⨆ i ∈ s, N i).FG := by simpa only [Finset.sup_eq_iSup] using fg_finset_sup s N h
#align submodule.fg_bsupr Submodule.fg_biSup
theorem fg_iSup {ι : Sort*} [Finite ι] (N : ι → Submodule R M) (h : ∀ i, (N i).FG) :
(iSup N).FG := by
cases nonempty_fintype (PLift ι)
simpa [iSup_plift_down] using fg_biSup Finset.univ (N ∘ PLift.down) fun i _ => h i.down
#align submodule.fg_supr Submodule.fg_iSup
variable {P : Type*} [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] P)
theorem FG.map {N : Submodule R M} (hs : N.FG) : (N.map f).FG :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := fg_def.1 hs
fg_def.2 ⟨f '' t, ht.1.image _, by rw [span_image, ht.2]⟩
#align submodule.fg.map Submodule.FG.map
variable {f}
theorem fg_of_fg_map_injective (f : M →ₗ[R] P) (hf : Function.Injective f) {N : Submodule R M}
(hfn : (N.map f).FG) : N.FG :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hfn
⟨t.preimage f fun x _ y _ h => hf h,
Submodule.map_injective_of_injective hf <| by
rw [map_span, Finset.coe_preimage, Set.image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left, ht]
rw [← LinearMap.range_coe, ← span_le, ht, ← map_top]
exact map_mono le_top⟩
#align submodule.fg_of_fg_map_injective Submodule.fg_of_fg_map_injective
theorem fg_of_fg_map {R M P : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [AddCommGroup P]
[Module R P] (f : M →ₗ[R] P)
(hf : LinearMap.ker f = ⊥) {N : Submodule R M}
(hfn : (N.map f).FG) : N.FG :=
fg_of_fg_map_injective f (LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.1 hf) hfn
#align submodule.fg_of_fg_map Submodule.fg_of_fg_map
theorem fg_top (N : Submodule R M) : (⊤ : Submodule R N).FG ↔ N.FG :=
⟨fun h => N.range_subtype ▸ map_top N.subtype ▸ h.map _, fun h =>
fg_of_fg_map_injective N.subtype Subtype.val_injective <| by rwa [map_top, range_subtype]⟩
#align submodule.fg_top Submodule.fg_top
theorem fg_of_linearEquiv (e : M ≃ₗ[R] P) (h : (⊤ : Submodule R P).FG) : (⊤ : Submodule R M).FG :=
e.symm.range ▸ map_top (e.symm : P →ₗ[R] M) ▸ h.map _
#align submodule.fg_of_linear_equiv Submodule.fg_of_linearEquiv
theorem FG.prod {sb : Submodule R M} {sc : Submodule R P} (hsb : sb.FG) (hsc : sc.FG) :
(sb.prod sc).FG :=
let ⟨tb, htb⟩ := fg_def.1 hsb
let ⟨tc, htc⟩ := fg_def.1 hsc
fg_def.2
⟨LinearMap.inl R M P '' tb ∪ LinearMap.inr R M P '' tc, (htb.1.image _).union (htc.1.image _),
by rw [LinearMap.span_inl_union_inr, htb.2, htc.2]⟩
#align submodule.fg.prod Submodule.FG.prod
theorem fg_pi {ι : Type*} {M : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (M i)]
[∀ i, Module R (M i)] {p : ∀ i, Submodule R (M i)} (hsb : ∀ i, (p i).FG) :
(Submodule.pi Set.univ p).FG := by
classical
simp_rw [fg_def] at hsb ⊢
choose t htf hts using hsb
refine
⟨⋃ i, (LinearMap.single i : _ →ₗ[R] _) '' t i, Set.finite_iUnion fun i => (htf i).image _, ?_⟩
-- Note: #8386 changed `span_image` into `span_image _`
simp_rw [span_iUnion, span_image _, hts, Submodule.iSup_map_single]
#align submodule.fg_pi Submodule.fg_pi
/-- If 0 → M' → M → M'' → 0 is exact and M' and M'' are
finitely generated then so is M. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Finiteness.lean | 261 | 332 | theorem fg_of_fg_map_of_fg_inf_ker {R M P : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[AddCommGroup P] [Module R P] (f : M →ₗ[R] P) {s : Submodule R M}
(hs1 : (s.map f).FG)
(hs2 : (s ⊓ LinearMap.ker f).FG) : s.FG := by |
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.decEq M
haveI := Classical.decEq P
cases' hs1 with t1 ht1
cases' hs2 with t2 ht2
have : ∀ y ∈ t1, ∃ x ∈ s, f x = y := by
intro y hy
have : y ∈ s.map f := by
rw [← ht1]
exact subset_span hy
rcases mem_map.1 this with ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩
exact ⟨x, hx1, hx2⟩
have : ∃ g : P → M, ∀ y ∈ t1, g y ∈ s ∧ f (g y) = y := by
choose g hg1 hg2 using this
exists fun y => if H : y ∈ t1 then g y H else 0
intro y H
constructor
· simp only [dif_pos H]
apply hg1
· simp only [dif_pos H]
apply hg2
cases' this with g hg
clear this
exists t1.image g ∪ t2
rw [Finset.coe_union, span_union, Finset.coe_image]
apply le_antisymm
· refine sup_le (span_le.2 <| image_subset_iff.2 ?_) (span_le.2 ?_)
· intro y hy
exact (hg y hy).1
· intro x hx
have : x ∈ span R t2 := subset_span hx
rw [ht2] at this
exact this.1
intro x hx
have : f x ∈ s.map f := by
rw [mem_map]
exact ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
rw [← ht1, ← Set.image_id (t1 : Set P), Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total] at this
rcases this with ⟨l, hl1, hl2⟩
refine
mem_sup.2
⟨(Finsupp.total M M R id).toFun ((Finsupp.lmapDomain R R g : (P →₀ R) → M →₀ R) l), ?_,
x - Finsupp.total M M R id ((Finsupp.lmapDomain R R g : (P →₀ R) → M →₀ R) l), ?_,
add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
· rw [← Set.image_id (g '' ↑t1), Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total]
refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
haveI : Inhabited P := ⟨0⟩
rw [← Finsupp.lmapDomain_supported _ _ g, mem_map]
refine ⟨l, hl1, ?_⟩
rfl
rw [ht2, mem_inf]
constructor
· apply s.sub_mem hx
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply, Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index]
· refine s.sum_mem ?_
intro y hy
exact s.smul_mem _ (hg y (hl1 hy)).1
· exact zero_smul _
· exact fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
· rw [LinearMap.mem_ker, f.map_sub, ← hl2]
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.lmapDomain_apply]
rw [Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index, Finsupp.sum, Finsupp.sum, map_sum]
· rw [sub_eq_zero]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_
unfold id
rw [f.map_smul, (hg y (hl1 hy)).2]
· exact zero_smul _
· exact fun _ _ _ => add_smul _ _ _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* `valMinAbs` returns the integer closest to zero in the equivalence class.
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
#align zmod.ring_char_zmod_n ZMod.ringChar_zmod_n
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
#align zmod.nat_cast_self ZMod.natCast_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
#align zmod.nat_cast_self' ZMod.natCast_self'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self' := natCast_self'
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
#align zmod.cast ZMod.cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
#align zmod.cast_zero ZMod.cast_zero
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.cast_eq_val ZMod.cast_eq_val
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.fst_zmod_cast Prod.fst_zmod_cast
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.snd_zmod_cast Prod.snd_zmod_cast
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_val ZMod.natCast_zmod_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_val := natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
#align zmod.nat_cast_right_inverse ZMod.natCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_rightInverse := natCast_rightInverse
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_surjective ZMod.natCast_zmod_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_surjective := natCast_zmod_surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
erw [Int.cast_natCast, Fin.cast_val_eq_self]
#align zmod.int_cast_zmod_cast ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_cast := intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
#align zmod.int_cast_right_inverse ZMod.intCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_rightInverse := intCast_rightInverse
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.int_cast_surjective ZMod.intCast_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_surjective := intCast_surjective
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
#align zmod.cast_id ZMod.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
#align zmod.cast_id' ZMod.cast_id'
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.nat_cast_comp_val ZMod.natCast_comp_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp_val := natCast_comp_val
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 284 | 288 | theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by |
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Content
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Compact
#align_import measure_theory.measure.haar.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Haar measure
In this file we prove the existence of Haar measure for a locally compact Hausdorff topological
group.
We follow the write-up by Jonathan Gleason, *Existence and Uniqueness of Haar Measure*.
This is essentially the same argument as in
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_measure#A_construction_using_compact_subsets.
We construct the Haar measure first on compact sets. For this we define `(K : U)` as the (smallest)
number of left-translates of `U` that are needed to cover `K` (`index` in the formalization).
Then we define a function `h` on compact sets as `lim_U (K : U) / (K₀ : U)`,
where `U` becomes a smaller and smaller open neighborhood of `1`, and `K₀` is a fixed compact set
with nonempty interior. This function is `chaar` in the formalization, and we define the limit
formally using Tychonoff's theorem.
This function `h` forms a content, which we can extend to an outer measure and then a measure
(`haarMeasure`).
We normalize the Haar measure so that the measure of `K₀` is `1`.
Note that `μ` need not coincide with `h` on compact sets, according to
[halmos1950measure, ch. X, §53 p.233]. However, we know that `h(K)` lies between `μ(Kᵒ)` and `μ(K)`,
where `ᵒ` denotes the interior.
We also give a form of uniqueness of Haar measure, for σ-finite measures on second-countable
locally compact groups. For more involved statements not assuming second-countability, see
the file `MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique`.
## Main Declarations
* `haarMeasure`: the Haar measure on a locally compact Hausdorff group. This is a left invariant
regular measure. It takes as argument a compact set of the group (with non-empty interior),
and is normalized so that the measure of the given set is 1.
* `haarMeasure_self`: the Haar measure is normalized.
* `isMulLeftInvariant_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure is left invariant.
* `regular_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure is a regular measure.
* `isHaarMeasure_haarMeasure`: the Haar measure satisfies the `IsHaarMeasure` typeclass, i.e.,
it is invariant and gives finite mass to compact sets and positive mass to nonempty open sets.
* `haar` : some choice of a Haar measure, on a locally compact Hausdorff group, constructed as
`haarMeasure K` where `K` is some arbitrary choice of a compact set with nonempty interior.
* `haarMeasure_unique`: Every σ-finite left invariant measure on a second-countable locally compact
Hausdorff group is a scalar multiple of the Haar measure.
## References
* Paul Halmos (1950), Measure Theory, §53
* Jonathan Gleason, Existence and Uniqueness of Haar Measure
- Note: step 9, page 8 contains a mistake: the last defined `μ` does not extend the `μ` on compact
sets, see Halmos (1950) p. 233, bottom of the page. This makes some other steps (like step 11)
invalid.
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_measure
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Inv Function TopologicalSpace MeasurableSpace
open scoped NNReal Classical ENNReal Pointwise Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace Measure
section Group
variable {G : Type*} [Group G]
/-! We put the internal functions in the construction of the Haar measure in a namespace,
so that the chosen names don't clash with other declarations.
We first define a couple of the functions before proving the properties (that require that `G`
is a topological group). -/
namespace haar
-- Porting note: Even in `noncomputable section`, a definition with `to_additive` require
-- `noncomputable` to generate an additive definition.
-- Please refer to leanprover/lean4#2077.
/-- The index or Haar covering number or ratio of `K` w.r.t. `V`, denoted `(K : V)`:
it is the smallest number of (left) translates of `V` that is necessary to cover `K`.
It is defined to be 0 if no finite number of translates cover `K`. -/
@[to_additive addIndex "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index`"]
noncomputable def index (K V : Set G) : ℕ :=
sInf <| Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex
@[to_additive addIndex_empty]
theorem index_empty {V : Set G} : index ∅ V = 0 := by
simp only [index, Nat.sInf_eq_zero]; left; use ∅
simp only [Finset.card_empty, empty_subset, mem_setOf_eq, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_empty
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
/-- `prehaar K₀ U K` is a weighted version of the index, defined as `(K : U)/(K₀ : U)`.
In the applications `K₀` is compact with non-empty interior, `U` is open containing `1`,
and `K` is any compact set.
The argument `K` is a (bundled) compact set, so that we can consider `prehaar K₀ U` as an
element of `haarProduct` (below). -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar`"]
noncomputable def prehaar (K₀ U : Set G) (K : Compacts G) : ℝ :=
(index (K : Set G) U : ℝ) / index K₀ U
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_empty (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} : prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U ⊥ = 0 := by
rw [prehaar, Compacts.coe_bot, index_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_div]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_empty
@[to_additive]
theorem prehaar_nonneg (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) {U : Set G} (K : Compacts G) :
0 ≤ prehaar (K₀ : Set G) U K := by apply div_nonneg <;> norm_cast <;> apply zero_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.prehaar_nonneg
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_prehaar_nonneg MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addPrehaar_nonneg
/-- `haarProduct K₀` is the product of intervals `[0, (K : K₀)]`, for all compact sets `K`.
For all `U`, we can show that `prehaar K₀ U ∈ haarProduct K₀`. -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct`"]
def haarProduct (K₀ : Set G) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
pi univ fun K => Icc 0 <| index (K : Set G) K₀
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.haarProduct
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_haar_product MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addHaarProduct
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_prehaar_empty {K₀ : Set G} {f : Compacts G → ℝ} :
f ∈ haarProduct K₀ ↔ ∀ K : Compacts G, f K ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) (index (K : Set G) K₀) := by
simp only [haarProduct, Set.pi, forall_prop_of_true, mem_univ, mem_setOf_eq]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_prehaar_empty
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.mem_add_prehaar_empty MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.mem_addPrehaar_empty
/-- The closure of the collection of elements of the form `prehaar K₀ U`,
for `U` open neighbourhoods of `1`, contained in `V`. The closure is taken in the space
`compacts G → ℝ`, with the topology of pointwise convergence.
We show that the intersection of all these sets is nonempty, and the Haar measure
on compact sets is defined to be an element in the closure of this intersection. -/
@[to_additive "additive version of `MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar`"]
def clPrehaar (K₀ : Set G) (V : OpenNhdsOf (1 : G)) : Set (Compacts G → ℝ) :=
closure <| prehaar K₀ '' { U : Set G | U ⊆ V.1 ∧ IsOpen U ∧ (1 : G) ∈ U }
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clPrehaar
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.cl_add_prehaar MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.clAddPrehaar
variable [TopologicalGroup G]
/-!
### Lemmas about `index`
-/
/-- If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined,
there is a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties. -/
@[to_additive addIndex_defined
"If `K` is compact and `V` has nonempty interior, then the index `(K : V)` is well-defined, there is
a finite set `t` satisfying the desired properties."]
theorem index_defined {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ n : ℕ, n ∈ Finset.card '' { t : Finset G | K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V } := by
rcases compact_covered_by_mul_left_translates hK hV with ⟨t, ht⟩; exact ⟨t.card, t, ht, rfl⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_defined
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_defined MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_defined
@[to_additive addIndex_elim]
theorem index_elim {K V : Set G} (hK : IsCompact K) (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
∃ t : Finset G, (K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ t, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) ∧ Finset.card t = index K V := by
have := Nat.sInf_mem (index_defined hK hV); rwa [mem_image] at this
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_elim
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_elim MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_elim
@[to_additive le_addIndex_mul]
theorem le_index_mul (K₀ : PositiveCompacts G) (K : Compacts G) {V : Set G}
(hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K : Set G) V ≤ index (K : Set G) K₀ * index (K₀ : Set G) V := by
obtain ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩ := index_elim K.isCompact K₀.interior_nonempty
obtain ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩ := index_elim K₀.isCompact hV
rw [← h2s, ← h2t, mul_comm]
refine le_trans ?_ Finset.card_mul_le
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]; refine Subset.trans h1s ?_
apply iUnion₂_subset; intro g₁ hg₁; rw [preimage_subset_iff]; intro g₂ hg₂
have := h1t hg₂
rcases this with ⟨_, ⟨g₃, rfl⟩, A, ⟨hg₃, rfl⟩, h2V⟩; rw [mem_preimage, ← mul_assoc] at h2V
exact mem_biUnion (Finset.mul_mem_mul hg₃ hg₁) h2V
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_index_mul
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.le_add_index_mul MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.le_addIndex_mul
@[to_additive addIndex_pos]
theorem index_pos (K : PositiveCompacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
0 < index (K : Set G) V := by
unfold index; rw [Nat.sInf_def, Nat.find_pos, mem_image]
· rintro ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩; rw [Finset.card_eq_zero] at h2t; subst h2t
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := K.interior_nonempty
show g ∈ (∅ : Set G)
convert h1t (interior_subset hg); symm
simp only [Finset.not_mem_empty, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty]
· exact index_defined K.isCompact hV
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_pos
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_pos MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_pos
@[to_additive addIndex_mono]
theorem index_mono {K K' V : Set G} (hK' : IsCompact K') (h : K ⊆ K') (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index K V ≤ index K' V := by
rcases index_elim hK' hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
apply Nat.sInf_le; rw [mem_image]; exact ⟨s, Subset.trans h h1s, h2s⟩
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_mono
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_mono MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_mono
@[to_additive addIndex_union_le]
theorem index_union_le (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V ≤ index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by
rcases index_elim K₁.2 hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩
rcases index_elim K₂.2 hV with ⟨t, h1t, h2t⟩
rw [← h2s, ← h2t]
refine le_trans ?_ (Finset.card_union_le _ _)
apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
apply union_subset <;> refine Subset.trans (by assumption) ?_ <;>
apply biUnion_subset_biUnion_left <;> intro g hg <;> simp only [mem_def] at hg <;>
simp only [mem_def, Multiset.mem_union, Finset.union_val, hg, or_true_iff, true_or_iff]
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.index_union_le
#align measure_theory.measure.haar.add_index_union_le MeasureTheory.Measure.haar.addIndex_union_le
@[to_additive addIndex_union_eq]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Haar/Basic.lean | 236 | 268 | theorem index_union_eq (K₁ K₂ : Compacts G) {V : Set G} (hV : (interior V).Nonempty)
(h : Disjoint (K₁.1 * V⁻¹) (K₂.1 * V⁻¹)) :
index (K₁.1 ∪ K₂.1) V = index K₁.1 V + index K₂.1 V := by |
apply le_antisymm (index_union_le K₁ K₂ hV)
rcases index_elim (K₁.2.union K₂.2) hV with ⟨s, h1s, h2s⟩; rw [← h2s]
have :
∀ K : Set G,
(K ⊆ ⋃ g ∈ s, (fun h => g * h) ⁻¹' V) →
index K V ≤ (s.filter fun g => ((fun h : G => g * h) ⁻¹' V ∩ K).Nonempty).card := by
intro K hK; apply Nat.sInf_le; refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩; rw [mem_setOf_eq]
intro g hg; rcases hK hg with ⟨_, ⟨g₀, rfl⟩, _, ⟨h1g₀, rfl⟩, h2g₀⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h2g₀
simp only [mem_iUnion]; use g₀; constructor; swap
· simp only [Finset.mem_filter, h1g₀, true_and_iff]; use g
simp only [hg, h2g₀, mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage, and_self_iff]
exact h2g₀
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (this K₁.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_left h1s)
(this K₂.1 <| Subset.trans subset_union_right h1s)) ?_
rw [← Finset.card_union_of_disjoint, Finset.filter_union_right]
· exact s.card_filter_le _
apply Finset.disjoint_filter.mpr
rintro g₁ _ ⟨g₂, h1g₂, h2g₂⟩ ⟨g₃, h1g₃, h2g₃⟩
simp only [mem_preimage] at h1g₃ h1g₂
refine h.le_bot (?_ : g₁⁻¹ ∈ _)
constructor <;> simp only [Set.mem_inv, Set.mem_mul, exists_exists_and_eq_and, exists_and_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₂, (g₁ * g₂)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₂]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
· refine ⟨_, h2g₃, (g₁ * g₃)⁻¹, ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [inv_inv, h1g₃]
· simp only [mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_cancel_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Init.ZeroOne
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
#align_import data.set.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"001ffdc42920050657fd45bd2b8bfbec8eaaeb29"
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the core library.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the core
library, as well as extra lemmas for functions in the core library (empty set, univ, union,
intersection, insert, singleton, set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v w x
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebraSet : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
#align set.top_eq_univ Set.top_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.bot_eq_empty Set.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.sup_eq_union Set.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.inf_eq_inter Set.inf_eq_inter
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.le_eq_subset Set.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align set.lt_eq_ssubset Set.lt_eq_ssubset
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.le_iff_subset Set.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.lt_iff_ssubset Set.lt_iff_ssubset
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.le HasSubset.Subset.le
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
#align has_ssubset.ssubset.lt HasSSubset.SSubset.lt
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift Set.PiSetCoe.canLift
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align set.pi_set_coe.can_lift' Set.PiSetCoe.canLift'
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_eq_subtype Set.coe_eq_subtype
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
#align set.coe_set_of Set.coe_setOf
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align set_coe.forall SetCoe.forall
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align set_coe.exists SetCoe.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.exists' SetCoe.exists'
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
#align set_coe.forall' SetCoe.forall'
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
#align set_coe_cast set_coe_cast
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
#align set_coe.ext SetCoe.ext
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
#align set_coe.ext_iff SetCoe.ext_iff
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
#align subtype.mem Subtype.mem
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
#align eq.subset Eq.subset
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
theorem ext_iff {s t : Set α} : s = t ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun h x => by rw [h], ext⟩
#align set.ext_iff Set.ext_iff
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
#align set.mem_of_mem_of_subset Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
#align set.forall_in_swap Set.forall_in_swap
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_set_of Set.mem_setOf
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
#align has_mem.mem.out Membership.mem.out
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nmem_set_of_iff Set.nmem_setOf_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_mem_eq Set.setOf_mem_eq
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_set Set.setOf_set
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_app_iff Set.setOf_app_iff
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_def Set.mem_def
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
#align set.set_of_bijective Set.setOf_bijective
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.set_of_subset_set_of Set.setOf_subset_setOf
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_and Set.setOf_and
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_or Set.setOf_or
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
#align set.subset_def Set.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
#align set.ssubset_def Set.ssubset_def
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
#align set.subset.refl Set.Subset.refl
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
#align set.subset.rfl Set.Subset.rfl
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
#align set.subset.trans Set.Subset.trans
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
#align set.mem_of_eq_of_mem Set.mem_of_eq_of_mem
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm Set.Subset.antisymm
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
#align set.subset.antisymm_iff Set.Subset.antisymm_iff
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
#align set.eq_of_subset_of_subset Set.eq_of_subset_of_subset
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
#align set.mem_of_subset_of_mem Set.mem_of_subset_of_mem
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
#align set.not_mem_subset Set.not_mem_subset
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
#align set.not_subset Set.not_subset
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
#align set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset Set.eq_or_ssubset_of_subset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
#align set.exists_of_ssubset Set.exists_of_ssubset
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
#align set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Set.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
#align set.ssubset_iff_of_subset Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
#align set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
#align set.not_mem_empty Set.not_mem_empty
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` because `simp` can prove it
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_not_mem Set.not_not_mem
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
-- Porting note: we seem to need parentheses at `(↥s)`,
-- even if we increase the right precedence of `↥` in `Mathlib.Tactic.Coe`.
-- Porting note: removed `simp` as it is competing with `nonempty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty (↥s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align set.nonempty_coe_sort Set.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align set.nonempty.coe_sort Set.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.nonempty_def Set.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_mem Set.nonempty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
#align set.nonempty.not_subset_empty Set.Nonempty.not_subset_empty
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
#align set.nonempty.some Set.Nonempty.some
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
#align set.nonempty.some_mem Set.Nonempty.some_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
#align set.nonempty.mono Set.Nonempty.mono
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
#align set.nonempty_of_not_subset Set.nonempty_of_not_subset
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset Set.nonempty_of_ssubset
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.of_diff Set.Nonempty.of_diff
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
#align set.nonempty_of_ssubset' Set.nonempty_of_ssubset'
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.nonempty.inl Set.Nonempty.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.nonempty.inr Set.Nonempty.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
#align set.union_nonempty Set.union_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
#align set.nonempty.left Set.Nonempty.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
#align set.nonempty.right Set.Nonempty.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.inter_nonempty Set.inter_nonempty
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
#align set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
#align set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty Set.nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.univ_nonempty Set.univ_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
#align set.nonempty.to_subtype Set.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align set.nonempty.to_type Set.Nonempty.to_type
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
#align set.univ.nonempty Set.univ.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
#align set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype Set.nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
#align set.empty_def Set.empty_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_empty_iff_false Set.mem_empty_iff_false
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_false Set.setOf_false
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
#align set.empty_subset Set.empty_subset
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
#align set.subset_empty_iff Set.subset_empty_iff
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
#align set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
#align set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
#align set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty Set.eq_empty_of_subset_empty
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
#align set.eq_empty_of_is_empty Set.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
#align set.unique_empty Set.uniqueEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
#align set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
#align set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.ne_empty Set.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
#align set.not_nonempty_empty Set.not_nonempty_empty
-- Porting note: removing `@[simp]` as it is competing with `isEmpty_subtype`.
-- @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
#align set.is_empty_coe_sort Set.isEmpty_coe_sort
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
#align set.eq_empty_or_nonempty Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
#align set.subset_eq_empty Set.subset_eq_empty
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
#align set.ball_empty_iff Set.forall_mem_empty
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_empty_iff := forall_mem_empty
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.empty_ssubset Set.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align set.nonempty.empty_ssubset Set.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_true Set.setOf_true
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
#align set.univ_eq_empty_iff Set.univ_eq_empty_iff
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
#align set.empty_ne_univ Set.empty_ne_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
#align set.subset_univ Set.subset_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
#align set.univ_subset_iff Set.univ_subset_iff
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
#align set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset Set.eq_univ_of_univ_subset
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
#align set.eq_univ_iff_forall Set.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
#align set.eq_univ_of_forall Set.eq_univ_of_forall
theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
exact eq_univ_of_forall fun y => by rwa [Subsingleton.elim y x]
#align set.nonempty.eq_univ Set.Nonempty.eq_univ
theorem eq_univ_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s = univ) : t = univ :=
eq_univ_of_univ_subset <| (hs ▸ h : univ ⊆ t)
#align set.eq_univ_of_subset Set.eq_univ_of_subset
theorem exists_mem_of_nonempty (α) : ∀ [Nonempty α], ∃ x : α, x ∈ (univ : Set α)
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
#align set.exists_mem_of_nonempty Set.exists_mem_of_nonempty
theorem ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem {α : Type*} (s : Set α) : s ≠ univ ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
rw [← not_forall, ← eq_univ_iff_forall]
#align set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem Set.ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem
theorem not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem {α : Type*} {s t : Set α} :
¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∉ t := by simp [subset_def]
#align set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem Set.not_subset_iff_exists_mem_not_mem
theorem univ_unique [Unique α] : @Set.univ α = {default} :=
Set.ext fun x => iff_of_true trivial <| Subsingleton.elim x default
#align set.univ_unique Set.univ_unique
theorem ssubset_univ_iff : s ⊂ univ ↔ s ≠ univ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top
#align set.ssubset_univ_iff Set.ssubset_univ_iff
instance nontrivial_of_nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Set α) :=
⟨⟨∅, univ, empty_ne_univ⟩⟩
#align set.nontrivial_of_nonempty Set.nontrivial_of_nonempty
/-! ### Lemmas about union -/
theorem union_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∪ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∨ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.union_def Set.union_def
theorem mem_union_left {x : α} {a : Set α} (b : Set α) : x ∈ a → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inl
#align set.mem_union_left Set.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right {x : α} {b : Set α} (a : Set α) : x ∈ b → x ∈ a ∪ b :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_union_right Set.mem_union_right
theorem mem_or_mem_of_mem_union {x : α} {a b : Set α} (H : x ∈ a ∪ b) : x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
H
#align set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union Set.mem_or_mem_of_mem_union
theorem MemUnion.elim {x : α} {a b : Set α} {P : Prop} (H₁ : x ∈ a ∪ b) (H₂ : x ∈ a → P)
(H₃ : x ∈ b → P) : P :=
Or.elim H₁ H₂ H₃
#align set.mem_union.elim Set.MemUnion.elim
@[simp]
theorem mem_union (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∪ b ↔ x ∈ a ∨ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_union Set.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem union_self (a : Set α) : a ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => or_self_iff
#align set.union_self Set.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (a : Set α) : a ∪ ∅ = a :=
ext fun _ => or_false_iff _
#align set.union_empty Set.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (a : Set α) : ∅ ∪ a = a :=
ext fun _ => false_or_iff _
#align set.empty_union Set.empty_union
theorem union_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∪ b = b ∪ a :=
ext fun _ => or_comm
#align set.union_comm Set.union_comm
theorem union_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∪ b ∪ c = a ∪ (b ∪ c) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.union_assoc Set.union_assoc
instance union_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
#align set.union_is_assoc Set.union_isAssoc
instance union_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
#align set.union_is_comm Set.union_isComm
theorem union_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) = s₂ ∪ (s₁ ∪ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_left_comm Set.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ s₃ ∪ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => or_right_comm
#align set.union_right_comm Set.union_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_left {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s :=
sup_eq_left
#align set.union_eq_left_iff_subset Set.union_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem union_eq_right {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sup_eq_right
#align set.union_eq_right_iff_subset Set.union_eq_right
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t = t :=
union_eq_right.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem union_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s ∪ t = s :=
union_eq_left.mpr h
#align set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.union_eq_self_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inl
#align set.subset_union_left Set.subset_union_left
@[simp]
theorem subset_union_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s ∪ t := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_union_right Set.subset_union_right
theorem union_subset {s t r : Set α} (sr : s ⊆ r) (tr : t ⊆ r) : s ∪ t ⊆ r := fun _ =>
Or.rec (@sr _) (@tr _)
#align set.union_subset Set.union_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => or_imp).trans forall_and
#align set.union_subset_iff Set.union_subset_iff
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h₂ : t₁ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∪ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ∪ t₂ := fun _ => Or.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.union_subset_union Set.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (t) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align set.union_subset_union_left Set.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (s) {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align set.union_subset_union_right Set.union_subset_union_right
theorem subset_union_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (u : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_left
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_left Set.subset_union_of_subset_left
theorem subset_union_of_subset_right {s u : Set α} (h : s ⊆ u) (t : Set α) : s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
h.trans subset_union_right
#align set.subset_union_of_subset_right Set.subset_union_of_subset_right
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align set.union_congr_left Set.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align set.union_congr_right Set.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_left Set.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align set.union_eq_union_iff_right Set.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem union_empty_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := by
simp only [← subset_empty_iff]
exact union_subset_iff
#align set.union_empty_iff Set.union_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem union_univ (s : Set α) : s ∪ univ = univ := sup_top_eq _
#align set.union_univ Set.union_univ
@[simp]
theorem univ_union (s : Set α) : univ ∪ s = univ := top_sup_eq _
#align set.univ_union Set.univ_union
/-! ### Lemmas about intersection -/
theorem inter_def {s₁ s₂ : Set α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ = { a | a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ } :=
rfl
#align set.inter_def Set.inter_def
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_inter_iff (x : α) (a b : Set α) : x ∈ a ∩ b ↔ x ∈ a ∧ x ∈ b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_inter_iff Set.mem_inter_iff
theorem mem_inter {x : α} {a b : Set α} (ha : x ∈ a) (hb : x ∈ b) : x ∈ a ∩ b :=
⟨ha, hb⟩
#align set.mem_inter Set.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ a :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_left Set.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {x : α} {a b : Set α} (h : x ∈ a ∩ b) : x ∈ b :=
h.right
#align set.mem_of_mem_inter_right Set.mem_of_mem_inter_right
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (a : Set α) : a ∩ a = a :=
ext fun _ => and_self_iff
#align set.inter_self Set.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (a : Set α) : a ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => and_false_iff _
#align set.inter_empty Set.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (a : Set α) : ∅ ∩ a = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => false_and_iff _
#align set.empty_inter Set.empty_inter
theorem inter_comm (a b : Set α) : a ∩ b = b ∩ a :=
ext fun _ => and_comm
#align set.inter_comm Set.inter_comm
theorem inter_assoc (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ∩ c = a ∩ (b ∩ c) :=
ext fun _ => and_assoc
#align set.inter_assoc Set.inter_assoc
instance inter_isAssoc : Std.Associative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_assoc⟩
#align set.inter_is_assoc Set.inter_isAssoc
instance inter_isComm : Std.Commutative (α := Set α) (· ∩ ·) :=
⟨inter_comm⟩
#align set.inter_is_comm Set.inter_isComm
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => and_left_comm
#align set.inter_left_comm Set.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => and_right_comm
#align set.inter_right_comm Set.inter_right_comm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.inter_subset_left Set.inter_subset_left
@[simp]
theorem inter_subset_right {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ⊆ t := fun _ => And.right
#align set.inter_subset_right Set.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s t r : Set α} (rs : r ⊆ s) (rt : r ⊆ t) : r ⊆ s ∩ t := fun _ h =>
⟨rs h, rt h⟩
#align set.subset_inter Set.subset_inter
@[simp]
theorem subset_inter_iff {s t r : Set α} : r ⊆ s ∩ t ↔ r ⊆ s ∧ r ⊆ t :=
(forall_congr' fun _ => imp_and).trans forall_and
#align set.subset_inter_iff Set.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align set.inter_eq_left_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : s ∩ t = t ↔ t ⊆ s := inf_eq_right
#align set.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Set.inter_eq_right
@[simp] lemma left_eq_inter : s = s ∩ t ↔ s ⊆ t := left_eq_inf
@[simp] lemma right_eq_inter : t = s ∩ t ↔ t ⊆ s := right_eq_inf
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_left {s t : Set α} : s ⊆ t → s ∩ t = s :=
inter_eq_left.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_left
theorem inter_eq_self_of_subset_right {s t : Set α} : t ⊆ s → s ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_right.mpr
#align set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right Set.inter_eq_self_of_subset_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align set.inter_congr_left Set.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align set.inter_congr_right Set.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Set.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem inter_univ (a : Set α) : a ∩ univ = a := inf_top_eq _
#align set.inter_univ Set.inter_univ
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_inter (a : Set α) : univ ∩ a = a := top_inf_eq _
#align set.univ_inter Set.univ_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} (h₁ : s₁ ⊆ t₁) (h₂ : s₂ ⊆ t₂) :
s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ t₁ ∩ t₂ := fun _ => And.imp (@h₁ _) (@h₂ _)
#align set.inter_subset_inter Set.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter H Subset.rfl
#align set.inter_subset_inter_left Set.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right {s t : Set α} (u : Set α) (H : s ⊆ t) : u ∩ s ⊆ u ∩ t :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl H
#align set.inter_subset_inter_right Set.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_left
#align set.union_inter_cancel_left Set.union_inter_cancel_left
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right subset_union_right
#align set.union_inter_cancel_right Set.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_setOf_eq_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : s ∩ {a | p a} = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
rfl
#align set.inter_set_of_eq_sep Set.inter_setOf_eq_sep
theorem setOf_inter_eq_sep (p : α → Prop) (s : Set α) : {a | p a} ∩ s = {a ∈ s | p a} :=
inter_comm _ _
#align set.set_of_inter_eq_sep Set.setOf_inter_eq_sep
/-! ### Distributivity laws -/
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_left Set.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_distrib_right Set.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_left Set.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align set.union_distrib_right Set.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_left Set.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.union_union_distrib_right Set.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_left Set.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_distrib_right Set.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.union_union_union_comm Set.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Set α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align set.inter_inter_inter_comm Set.inter_inter_inter_comm
/-!
### Lemmas about `insert`
`insert α s` is the set `{α} ∪ s`.
-/
theorem insert_def (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = { y | y = x ∨ y ∈ s } :=
rfl
#align set.insert_def Set.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem subset_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x s := fun _ => Or.inr
#align set.subset_insert Set.subset_insert
theorem mem_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : x ∈ insert x s :=
Or.inl rfl
#align set.mem_insert Set.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {x : α} {s : Set α} (y : α) : x ∈ s → x ∈ insert y s :=
Or.inr
#align set.mem_insert_of_mem Set.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s → x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
id
#align set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_or_mem_of_mem_insert
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne : b ∈ insert a s → b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
Or.resolve_left
#align set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Set.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert : b ∈ insert a s → b ∉ s → b = a :=
Or.resolve_right
#align set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Set.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x a : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ insert a s ↔ x = a ∨ x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_insert_iff Set.mem_insert_iff
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_right_of_imp fun e => e.symm ▸ h
#align set.insert_eq_of_mem Set.insert_eq_of_mem
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem {s : Set α} (t : Set α) {a : α} : a ∉ s → s ≠ insert a t :=
mt fun e => e.symm ▸ mem_insert _ _
#align set.ne_insert_of_not_mem Set.ne_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align set.insert_eq_self Set.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align set.insert_ne_self Set.insert_ne_self
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_insert_iff, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align set.insert_subset Set.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha, hs⟩
theorem insert_subset_insert (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t := fun _ => Or.imp_right (@h _)
#align set.insert_subset_insert Set.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] theorem insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => ?_, insert_subset_insert⟩
rcases h (subset_insert _ _ hx) with (rfl | hxt)
exacts [(ha hx).elim, hxt]
#align set.insert_subset_insert_iff Set.insert_subset_insert_iff
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
forall₂_congr fun _ hb => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb ha
#align set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Set.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem ssubset_iff_insert {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := by
simp only [insert_subset_iff, exists_and_right, ssubset_def, not_subset]
aesop
#align set.ssubset_iff_insert Set.ssubset_iff_insert
theorem ssubset_insert {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_insert.2 ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align set.ssubset_insert Set.ssubset_insert
theorem insert_comm (a b : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.insert_comm Set.insert_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): removing `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Set α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_insert _ _
#align set.insert_idem Set.insert_idem
theorem insert_union : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_assoc
#align set.insert_union Set.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) :=
ext fun _ => or_left_comm
#align set.union_insert Set.union_insert
@[simp]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert a s⟩
#align set.insert_nonempty Set.insert_nonempty
instance (a : α) (s : Set α) : Nonempty (insert a s : Set α) :=
(insert_nonempty a s).to_subtype
theorem insert_inter_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_and_left
#align set.insert_inter_distrib Set.insert_inter_distrib
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Set α) : insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t :=
ext fun _ => or_or_distrib_left
#align set.insert_union_distrib Set.insert_union_distrib
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert a s) ha,
congr_arg (fun x => insert x s)⟩
#align set.insert_inj Set.insert_inj
-- useful in proofs by induction
theorem forall_of_forall_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ insert a s → P x)
(x) (h : x ∈ s) : P x :=
H _ (Or.inr h)
#align set.forall_of_forall_insert Set.forall_of_forall_insert
theorem forall_insert_of_forall {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s → P x) (ha : P a)
(x) (h : x ∈ insert a s) : P x :=
h.elim (fun e => e.symm ▸ ha) (H _)
#align set.forall_insert_of_forall Set.forall_insert_of_forall
/- Porting note: ∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x is parsed as ∃ x, x ∈ insert a s ∧ P x,
where in Lean3 it was parsed as `∃ x, ∃ (h : x ∈ insert a s), P x` -/
theorem exists_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∃ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ (P a ∨ ∃ x ∈ s, P x) := by
simp [mem_insert_iff, or_and_right, exists_and_left, exists_or]
#align set.bex_insert_iff Set.exists_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias bex_insert_iff := exists_mem_insert
theorem forall_mem_insert {P : α → Prop} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
(∀ x ∈ insert a s, P x) ↔ P a ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
forall₂_or_left.trans <| and_congr_left' forall_eq
#align set.ball_insert_iff Set.forall_mem_insert
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias ball_insert_iff := forall_mem_insert
/-! ### Lemmas about singletons -/
/- porting note: instance was in core in Lean3 -/
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Set α) :=
⟨fun x => Set.ext fun a => by
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, mem_insert_iff, or_false]
exact Iff.rfl⟩
theorem singleton_def (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) = insert a ∅ :=
(insert_emptyc_eq a).symm
#align set.singleton_def Set.singleton_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton_iff {a b : α} : a ∈ ({b} : Set α) ↔ a = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_singleton_iff Set.mem_singleton_iff
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { n | n = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem setOf_eq_eq_singleton' {a : α} : { x | a = x } = {a} :=
ext fun _ => eq_comm
#align set.set_of_eq_eq_singleton' Set.setOf_eq_eq_singleton'
-- TODO: again, annotation needed
--Porting note (#11119): removed `simp` attribute
theorem mem_singleton (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Set α) :=
@rfl _ _
#align set.mem_singleton Set.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Set α)) : x = y :=
h
#align set.eq_of_mem_singleton Set.eq_of_mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_singleton_iff {x y : α} : {x} = ({y} : Set α) ↔ x = y :=
ext_iff.trans eq_iff_eq_cancel_left
#align set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff Set.singleton_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Set α) := fun _ _ =>
singleton_eq_singleton_iff.mp
#align set.singleton_injective Set.singleton_injective
theorem mem_singleton_of_eq {x y : α} (H : x = y) : x ∈ ({y} : Set α) :=
H
#align set.mem_singleton_of_eq Set.mem_singleton_of_eq
theorem insert_eq (x : α) (s : Set α) : insert x s = ({x} : Set α) ∪ s :=
rfl
#align set.insert_eq Set.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, rfl⟩
#align set.singleton_nonempty Set.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Set α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty _).ne_empty
#align set.singleton_ne_empty Set.singleton_ne_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Set α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align set.empty_ssubset_singleton Set.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
forall_eq
#align set.singleton_subset_iff Set.singleton_subset_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align set.singleton_subset_singleton Set.singleton_subset_singleton
theorem set_compr_eq_eq_singleton {a : α} : { b | b = a } = {a} :=
rfl
#align set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton Set.set_compr_eq_eq_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_union : {a} ∪ s = insert a s :=
rfl
#align set.singleton_union Set.singleton_union
@[simp]
theorem union_singleton : s ∪ {a} = insert a s :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.union_singleton Set.union_singleton
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_nonempty : ({a} ∩ s).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, mem_singleton_iff, exists_eq_left]
#align set.singleton_inter_nonempty Set.singleton_inter_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_nonempty : (s ∩ {a}).Nonempty ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_nonempty]
#align set.inter_singleton_nonempty Set.inter_singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_eq_empty : {a} ∩ s = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans singleton_inter_nonempty.not
#align set.singleton_inter_eq_empty Set.singleton_inter_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_eq_empty : s ∩ {a} = ∅ ↔ a ∉ s := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_eq_empty]
#align set.inter_singleton_eq_empty Set.inter_singleton_eq_empty
theorem nmem_singleton_empty {s : Set α} : s ∉ ({∅} : Set (Set α)) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.nmem_singleton_empty Set.nmem_singleton_empty
instance uniqueSingleton (a : α) : Unique (↥({a} : Set α)) :=
⟨⟨⟨a, mem_singleton a⟩⟩, fun ⟨_, h⟩ => Subtype.eq h⟩
#align set.unique_singleton Set.uniqueSingleton
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_comm.trans <| and_congr_left' singleton_subset_iff
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem : s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a :=
eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem.trans <|
and_congr_left fun H => ⟨fun h' => ⟨_, h'⟩, fun ⟨x, h⟩ => H x h ▸ h⟩
#align set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Set.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
-- while `simp` is capable of proving this, it is not capable of turning the LHS into the RHS.
@[simp]
theorem default_coe_singleton (x : α) : (default : ({x} : Set α)) = ⟨x, rfl⟩ :=
rfl
#align set.default_coe_singleton Set.default_coe_singleton
/-! ### Lemmas about sets defined as `{x ∈ s | p x}`. -/
section Sep
variable {p q : α → Prop} {x : α}
theorem mem_sep (xs : x ∈ s) (px : p x) : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } :=
⟨xs, px⟩
#align set.mem_sep Set.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem sep_mem_eq : { x ∈ s | x ∈ t } = s ∩ t :=
rfl
#align set.sep_mem_eq Set.sep_mem_eq
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep_iff : x ∈ { x ∈ s | p x } ↔ x ∈ s ∧ p x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_sep_iff Set.mem_sep_iff
theorem sep_ext_iff : { x ∈ s | p x } = { x ∈ s | q x } ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x ↔ q x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
#align set.sep_ext_iff Set.sep_ext_iff
theorem sep_eq_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : { x ∈ t | x ∈ s } = s :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h
#align set.sep_eq_of_subset Set.sep_eq_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_subset (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ s | p x } ⊆ s := fun _ => And.left
#align set.sep_subset Set.sep_subset
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true : { x ∈ s | p x } = s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
#align set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true Set.sep_eq_self_iff_mem_true
@[simp]
theorem sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false : { x ∈ s | p x } = ∅ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ¬p x := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, mem_sep_iff, mem_empty_iff_false, iff_false_iff, not_and]
#align set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false Set.sep_eq_empty_iff_mem_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_true : { x ∈ s | True } = s :=
inter_univ s
#align set.sep_true Set.sep_true
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_false : { x ∈ s | False } = ∅ :=
inter_empty s
#align set.sep_false Set.sep_false
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_empty (p : α → Prop) : { x ∈ (∅ : Set α) | p x } = ∅ :=
empty_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_empty Set.sep_empty
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem sep_univ : { x ∈ (univ : Set α) | p x } = { x | p x } :=
univ_inter {x | p x}
#align set.sep_univ Set.sep_univ
@[simp]
theorem sep_union : { x | (x ∈ s ∨ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
union_inter_distrib_right { x | x ∈ s } { x | x ∈ t } p
#align set.sep_union Set.sep_union
@[simp]
theorem sep_inter : { x | (x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t) ∧ p x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ t | p x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_right s t {x | p x}
#align set.sep_inter Set.sep_inter
@[simp]
theorem sep_and : { x ∈ s | p x ∧ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∩ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_inter_distrib_left s {x | p x} {x | q x}
#align set.sep_and Set.sep_and
@[simp]
theorem sep_or : { x ∈ s | p x ∨ q x } = { x ∈ s | p x } ∪ { x ∈ s | q x } :=
inter_union_distrib_left s p q
#align set.sep_or Set.sep_or
@[simp]
theorem sep_setOf : { x ∈ { y | p y } | q x } = { x | p x ∧ q x } :=
rfl
#align set.sep_set_of Set.sep_setOf
end Sep
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {α : Type*} {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.subset_singleton_iff Set.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff_eq {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊆ {x} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {x} := by
obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨fun _ => Or.inl rfl, fun _ => empty_subset _⟩
· simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, hs, hs.ne_empty]
#align set.subset_singleton_iff_eq Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq
theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff (h : s.Nonempty) : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff_eq.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align set.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Set.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Set α} {x : α} : s ⊂ {x} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [ssubset_iff_subset_ne, subset_singleton_iff_eq, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff, or_false_iff,
and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h => h ▸ (singleton_ne_empty _).symm
#align set.ssubset_singleton_iff Set.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Set α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Set.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton {α} [Subsingleton α] (s t : Set α) [Nonempty s]
[Nonempty t] : s = t :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.trans nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype.eq_univ.symm
theorem eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {α} [Subsingleton α] {s : Set α} (t : Set α)
(hs : s.Nonempty) [Nonempty t] : s = t :=
have := hs.to_subtype; eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton s t
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_zero [Subsingleton α] [Zero α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {0} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {0} h
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
theorem Nonempty.eq_one [Subsingleton α] [One α] {s : Set α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s = {1} := eq_of_nonempty_of_subsingleton' {1} h
/-! ### Disjointness -/
protected theorem disjoint_iff : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t ⊆ ∅ :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le
#align set.disjoint_iff Set.disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
theorem _root_.Disjoint.inter_eq : Disjoint s t → s ∩ t = ∅ :=
Disjoint.eq_bot
#align disjoint.inter_eq Disjoint.inter_eq
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => not_and
#align set.disjoint_left Set.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by rw [disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align set.disjoint_right Set.disjoint_right
lemma not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Set.disjoint_iff.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ ↦ not_not
#align set.not_disjoint_iff Set.not_disjoint_iff
lemma not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬ Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := not_disjoint_iff
#align set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align set.nonempty.not_disjoint Set.Nonempty.not_disjoint
lemma disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Set α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
(em _).imp_right not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter.1
#align set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Set.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
lemma disjoint_iff_forall_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ t → a ≠ b := by
simp only [Ne, disjoint_left, @imp_not_comm _ (_ = _), forall_eq']
#align set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne Set.disjoint_iff_forall_ne
alias ⟨_root_.Disjoint.ne_of_mem, _⟩ := disjoint_iff_forall_ne
#align disjoint.ne_of_mem Disjoint.ne_of_mem
lemma disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_left h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_left Set.disjoint_of_subset_left
lemma disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t := d.mono_right h
#align set.disjoint_of_subset_right Set.disjoint_of_subset_right
lemma disjoint_of_subset (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (h : Disjoint s₂ t₂) : Disjoint s₁ t₁ :=
h.mono hs ht
#align set.disjoint_of_subset Set.disjoint_of_subset
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := disjoint_sup_left
#align set.disjoint_union_left Set.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := disjoint_sup_right
#align set.disjoint_union_right Set.disjoint_union_right
@[simp] lemma disjoint_empty (s : Set α) : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right
#align set.disjoint_empty Set.disjoint_empty
@[simp] lemma empty_disjoint (s : Set α) : Disjoint ∅ s := disjoint_bot_left
#align set.empty_disjoint Set.empty_disjoint
@[simp] lemma univ_disjoint : Disjoint univ s ↔ s = ∅ := top_disjoint
#align set.univ_disjoint Set.univ_disjoint
@[simp] lemma disjoint_univ : Disjoint s univ ↔ s = ∅ := disjoint_top
#align set.disjoint_univ Set.disjoint_univ
lemma disjoint_sdiff_left : Disjoint (t \ s) s := disjoint_sdiff_self_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_left Set.disjoint_sdiff_left
lemma disjoint_sdiff_right : Disjoint s (t \ s) := disjoint_sdiff_self_right
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_right Set.disjoint_sdiff_right
-- TODO: prove this in terms of a lattice lemma
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left
#align set.disjoint_sdiff_inter Set.disjoint_sdiff_inter
theorem diff_union_diff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
#align set.diff_union_diff_cancel Set.diff_union_diff_cancel
theorem diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u := sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
#align set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union Set.diff_diff_eq_sdiff_union
@[simp default+1]
lemma disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint {a} s ↔ a ∉ s := by simp [Set.disjoint_iff, subset_def]
#align set.disjoint_singleton_left Set.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
lemma disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s {a} ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align set.disjoint_singleton_right Set.disjoint_singleton_right
lemma disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Set α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
simp
#align set.disjoint_singleton Set.disjoint_singleton
lemma subset_diff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u := le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align set.subset_diff Set.subset_diff
lemma ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t \ {a} := by
simp [ssubset_iff_insert, subset_diff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
theorem inter_diff_distrib_left (s t u : Set α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_left _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_left Set.inter_diff_distrib_left
theorem inter_diff_distrib_right (s t u : Set α) : s \ t ∩ u = (s ∩ u) \ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_sdiff_distrib_right _ _ _
#align set.inter_diff_distrib_right Set.inter_diff_distrib_right
/-! ### Lemmas about complement -/
theorem compl_def (s : Set α) : sᶜ = { x | x ∉ s } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_def Set.compl_def
theorem mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) : x ∈ sᶜ :=
h
#align set.mem_compl Set.mem_compl
theorem compl_setOf {α} (p : α → Prop) : { a | p a }ᶜ = { a | ¬p a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_set_of Set.compl_setOf
theorem not_mem_of_mem_compl {s : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ sᶜ) : x ∉ s :=
h
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_compl Set.not_mem_of_mem_compl
theorem not_mem_compl_iff {x : α} : x ∉ sᶜ ↔ x ∈ s :=
not_not
#align set.not_mem_compl_iff Set.not_mem_compl_iff
@[simp]
theorem inter_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∩ sᶜ = ∅ :=
inf_compl_eq_bot
#align set.inter_compl_self Set.inter_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_inter_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∩ s = ∅ :=
compl_inf_eq_bot
#align set.compl_inter_self Set.compl_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty : (∅ : Set α)ᶜ = univ :=
compl_bot
#align set.compl_empty Set.compl_empty
@[simp]
theorem compl_union (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∩ tᶜ :=
compl_sup
#align set.compl_union Set.compl_union
theorem compl_inter (s t : Set α) : (s ∩ t)ᶜ = sᶜ ∪ tᶜ :=
compl_inf
#align set.compl_inter Set.compl_inter
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ : (univ : Set α)ᶜ = ∅ :=
compl_top
#align set.compl_univ Set.compl_univ
@[simp]
theorem compl_empty_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = ∅ ↔ s = univ :=
compl_eq_bot
#align set.compl_empty_iff Set.compl_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem compl_univ_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ = univ ↔ s = ∅ :=
compl_eq_top
#align set.compl_univ_iff Set.compl_univ_iff
theorem compl_ne_univ : sᶜ ≠ univ ↔ s.Nonempty :=
compl_univ_iff.not.trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.compl_ne_univ Set.compl_ne_univ
theorem nonempty_compl : sᶜ.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ univ :=
(ne_univ_iff_exists_not_mem s).symm
#align set.nonempty_compl Set.nonempty_compl
@[simp] lemma nonempty_compl_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial α] (x : α) : Set.Nonempty {x}ᶜ := by
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := exists_ne x
exact ⟨y, by simp [hy]⟩
theorem mem_compl_singleton_iff {a x : α} : x ∈ ({a} : Set α)ᶜ ↔ x ≠ a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_compl_singleton_iff Set.mem_compl_singleton_iff
theorem compl_singleton_eq (a : α) : ({a} : Set α)ᶜ = { x | x ≠ a } :=
rfl
#align set.compl_singleton_eq Set.compl_singleton_eq
@[simp]
theorem compl_ne_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({ x | x ≠ a } : Set α)ᶜ = {a} :=
compl_compl _
#align set.compl_ne_eq_singleton Set.compl_ne_eq_singleton
theorem union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = (sᶜ ∩ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => or_iff_not_and_not
#align set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl Set.union_eq_compl_compl_inter_compl
theorem inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t = (sᶜ ∪ tᶜ)ᶜ :=
ext fun _ => and_iff_not_or_not
#align set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl Set.inter_eq_compl_compl_union_compl
@[simp]
theorem union_compl_self (s : Set α) : s ∪ sᶜ = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2 fun _ => em _
#align set.union_compl_self Set.union_compl_self
@[simp]
theorem compl_union_self (s : Set α) : sᶜ ∪ s = univ := by rw [union_comm, union_compl_self]
#align set.compl_union_self Set.compl_union_self
theorem compl_subset_comm : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_iff_compl_le _ s _ _
#align set.compl_subset_comm Set.compl_subset_comm
theorem subset_compl_comm : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ sᶜ :=
@le_compl_iff_le_compl _ _ _ t
#align set.subset_compl_comm Set.subset_compl_comm
@[simp]
theorem compl_subset_compl : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ ↔ t ⊆ s :=
@compl_le_compl_iff_le (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.compl_subset_compl Set.compl_subset_compl
@[gcongr] theorem compl_subset_compl_of_subset (h : t ⊆ s) : sᶜ ⊆ tᶜ := compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint t s :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_left (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
theorem subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right : s ⊆ tᶜ ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@le_compl_iff_disjoint_right (Set α) _ _ _
#align set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right Set.subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset : Disjoint sᶜ t ↔ t ⊆ s :=
disjoint_compl_left_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
theorem disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset : Disjoint s tᶜ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
disjoint_compl_right_iff
#align set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset Set.disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_right⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right
#align disjoint.subset_compl_right Disjoint.subset_compl_right
alias ⟨_, _root_.Disjoint.subset_compl_left⟩ := subset_compl_iff_disjoint_left
#align disjoint.subset_compl_left Disjoint.subset_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left⟩ := disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_left HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_left
alias ⟨_, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right⟩ := disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset
#align has_subset.subset.disjoint_compl_right HasSubset.Subset.disjoint_compl_right
theorem subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset {s t u : Set α} : s ⊆ t ∪ uᶜ ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
(@isCompl_compl _ u _).le_sup_right_iff_inf_left_le
#align set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset Set.subset_union_compl_iff_inter_subset
theorem compl_subset_iff_union {s t : Set α} : sᶜ ⊆ t ↔ s ∪ t = univ :=
Iff.symm <| eq_univ_iff_forall.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => or_iff_not_imp_left
#align set.compl_subset_iff_union Set.compl_subset_iff_union
@[simp]
theorem subset_compl_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ {a}ᶜ ↔ a ∉ s :=
subset_compl_comm.trans singleton_subset_iff
#align set.subset_compl_singleton_iff Set.subset_compl_singleton_iff
theorem inter_subset (a b c : Set α) : a ∩ b ⊆ c ↔ a ⊆ bᶜ ∪ c :=
forall_congr' fun _ => and_imp.trans <| imp_congr_right fun _ => imp_iff_not_or
#align set.inter_subset Set.inter_subset
theorem inter_compl_nonempty_iff {s t : Set α} : (s ∩ tᶜ).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
(not_subset.trans <| exists_congr fun x => by simp [mem_compl]).symm
#align set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff
/-! ### Lemmas about set difference -/
theorem not_mem_diff_of_mem {s t : Set α} {x : α} (hx : x ∈ t) : x ∉ s \ t := fun h => h.2 hx
#align set.not_mem_diff_of_mem Set.not_mem_diff_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∈ s :=
h.left
#align set.mem_of_mem_diff Set.mem_of_mem_diff
theorem not_mem_of_mem_diff {s t : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s \ t) : x ∉ t :=
h.right
#align set.not_mem_of_mem_diff Set.not_mem_of_mem_diff
theorem diff_eq_compl_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ t = tᶜ ∩ s := by rw [diff_eq, inter_comm]
#align set.diff_eq_compl_inter Set.diff_eq_compl_inter
theorem nonempty_diff {s t : Set α} : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
inter_compl_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty_diff Set.nonempty_diff
theorem diff_subset {s t : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ s := show s \ t ≤ s from sdiff_le
#align set.diff_subset Set.diff_subset
theorem diff_subset_compl (s t : Set α) : s \ t ⊆ tᶜ :=
diff_eq_compl_inter ▸ inter_subset_left
theorem union_diff_cancel' {s t u : Set α} (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : t ⊆ u) : t ∪ u \ s = u :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' h₁ h₂
#align set.union_diff_cancel' Set.union_diff_cancel'
theorem union_diff_cancel {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align set.union_diff_cancel Set.union_diff_cancel
theorem union_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_left Set.union_diff_cancel_left
theorem union_diff_cancel_right {s t : Set α} (h : s ∩ t ⊆ ∅) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right <| disjoint_iff_inf_le.2 h
#align set.union_diff_cancel_right Set.union_diff_cancel_right
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_left {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align set.union_diff_left Set.union_diff_left
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_right {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align set.union_diff_right Set.union_diff_right
theorem union_diff_distrib {s t u : Set α} : (s ∪ t) \ u = s \ u ∪ t \ u :=
sup_sdiff
#align set.union_diff_distrib Set.union_diff_distrib
theorem inter_diff_assoc (a b c : Set α) : (a ∩ b) \ c = a ∩ (b \ c) :=
inf_sdiff_assoc
#align set.inter_diff_assoc Set.inter_diff_assoc
@[simp]
theorem inter_diff_self (a b : Set α) : a ∩ (b \ a) = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_right
#align set.inter_diff_self Set.inter_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_diff (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s \ t = s :=
sup_inf_sdiff s t
#align set.inter_union_diff Set.inter_union_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s := by
rw [union_comm]
exact sup_inf_sdiff _ _
#align set.diff_union_inter Set.diff_union_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_compl (s t : Set α) : s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ = s :=
inter_union_diff _ _
#align set.inter_union_compl Set.inter_union_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff {s₁ s₂ t₁ t₂ : Set α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₂ ⊆ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ⊆ s₂ \ t₂ :=
show s₁ ≤ s₂ → t₂ ≤ t₁ → s₁ \ t₁ ≤ s₂ \ t₂ from sdiff_le_sdiff
#align set.diff_subset_diff Set.diff_subset_diff
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_left {s₁ s₂ t : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ \ t ⊆ s₂ \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_right ‹s₁ ≤ s₂›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_left Set.diff_subset_diff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem diff_subset_diff_right {s t u : Set α} (h : t ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ s \ t :=
sdiff_le_sdiff_left ‹t ≤ u›
#align set.diff_subset_diff_right Set.diff_subset_diff_right
theorem compl_eq_univ_diff (s : Set α) : sᶜ = univ \ s :=
top_sdiff.symm
#align set.compl_eq_univ_diff Set.compl_eq_univ_diff
@[simp]
theorem empty_diff (s : Set α) : (∅ \ s : Set α) = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align set.empty_diff Set.empty_diff
theorem diff_eq_empty {s t : Set α} : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align set.diff_eq_empty Set.diff_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_empty {s : Set α} : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align set.diff_empty Set.diff_empty
@[simp]
theorem diff_univ (s : Set α) : s \ univ = ∅ :=
diff_eq_empty.2 (subset_univ s)
#align set.diff_univ Set.diff_univ
theorem diff_diff {u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sdiff_left
#align set.diff_diff Set.diff_diff
-- the following statement contains parentheses to help the reader
theorem diff_diff_comm {s t u : Set α} : (s \ t) \ u = (s \ u) \ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_comm
#align set.diff_diff_comm Set.diff_diff_comm
theorem diff_subset_iff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ t ∪ u from sdiff_le_iff
#align set.diff_subset_iff Set.diff_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_union (s t : Set α) : s ⊆ s \ t ∪ t :=
show s ≤ s \ t ∪ t from le_sdiff_sup
#align set.subset_diff_union Set.subset_diff_union
theorem diff_union_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ t ∪ t = s :=
Subset.antisymm (union_subset diff_subset h) (subset_diff_union _ _)
#align set.diff_union_of_subset Set.diff_union_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_subset_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} : s \ {x} ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ insert x t := by
rw [← union_singleton, union_comm]
apply diff_subset_iff
#align set.diff_singleton_subset_iff Set.diff_singleton_subset_iff
theorem subset_diff_singleton {x : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) (hx : x ∉ s) : s ⊆ t \ {x} :=
subset_inter h <| subset_compl_comm.1 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 hx
#align set.subset_diff_singleton Set.subset_diff_singleton
theorem subset_insert_diff_singleton (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ insert x (s \ {x}) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
#align set.subset_insert_diff_singleton Set.subset_insert_diff_singleton
theorem diff_subset_comm {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ⊆ u ↔ s \ u ⊆ t :=
show s \ t ≤ u ↔ s \ u ≤ t from sdiff_le_comm
#align set.diff_subset_comm Set.diff_subset_comm
theorem diff_inter {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align set.diff_inter Set.diff_inter
theorem diff_inter_diff {s t u : Set α} : s \ t ∩ (s \ u) = s \ (t ∪ u) :=
sdiff_sup.symm
#align set.diff_inter_diff Set.diff_inter_diff
theorem diff_compl : s \ tᶜ = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_compl
#align set.diff_compl Set.diff_compl
theorem diff_diff_right {s t u : Set α} : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_right'
#align set.diff_diff_right Set.diff_diff_right
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_of_mem (s) (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s \ t = s \ t := by
ext
constructor <;> simp (config := { contextual := true }) [or_imp, h]
#align set.insert_diff_of_mem Set.insert_diff_of_mem
theorem insert_diff_of_not_mem (s) (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s \ t = insert a (s \ t) := by
classical
ext x
by_cases h' : x ∈ t
· have : x ≠ a := by
intro H
rw [H] at h'
exact h h'
simp [h, h', this]
· simp [h, h']
#align set.insert_diff_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_diff_self_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ {a} = s := by
ext x
simp [and_iff_left_of_imp fun hx : x ∈ s => show x ≠ a from fun hxa => h <| hxa ▸ hx]
#align set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem Set.insert_diff_self_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_eq_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
ext
rw [Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, or_and_right, and_not_self_iff,
or_false_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl
exact h
#align set.insert_diff_eq_singleton Set.insert_diff_eq_singleton
theorem inter_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ insert a t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.inter_insert_of_mem Set.inter_insert_of_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : insert a s ∩ t = insert a (s ∩ t) := by
rw [insert_inter_distrib, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align set.insert_inter_of_mem Set.insert_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ insert a t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_right fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.inter_insert_of_not_mem Set.inter_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ t) : insert a s ∩ t = s ∩ t :=
ext fun _ => and_congr_left fun hx => or_iff_right <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
#align set.insert_inter_of_not_mem Set.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem union_diff_self {s t : Set α} : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self _ _
#align set.union_diff_self Set.union_diff_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_union_self {s t : Set α} : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sdiff_sup_self _ _
#align set.diff_union_self Set.diff_union_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self {a b : Set α} : b \ a ∩ a = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align set.diff_inter_self Set.diff_inter_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_inter_self_eq_diff {s t : Set α} : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff Set.diff_inter_self_eq_diff
@[simp]
theorem diff_self_inter {s t : Set α} : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align set.diff_self_inter Set.diff_self_inter
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_eq_self {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 <| by simp [h]
#align set.diff_singleton_eq_self Set.diff_singleton_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem diff_singleton_sSubset {s : Set α} {a : α} : s \ {a} ⊂ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
sdiff_le.lt_iff_ne.trans <| sdiff_eq_left.not.trans <| by simp
#align set.diff_singleton_ssubset Set.diff_singleton_sSubset
@[simp]
theorem insert_diff_singleton {a : α} {s : Set α} : insert a (s \ {a}) = insert a s := by
simp [insert_eq, union_diff_self, -union_singleton, -singleton_union]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton Set.insert_diff_singleton
theorem insert_diff_singleton_comm (hab : a ≠ b) (s : Set α) :
insert a (s \ {b}) = insert a s \ {b} := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, union_diff_distrib,
diff_singleton_eq_self (mem_singleton_iff.not.2 hab.symm)]
#align set.insert_diff_singleton_comm Set.insert_diff_singleton_comm
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem diff_self {s : Set α} : s \ s = ∅ :=
sdiff_self
#align set.diff_self Set.diff_self
theorem diff_diff_right_self (s t : Set α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
#align set.diff_diff_right_self Set.diff_diff_right_self
theorem diff_diff_cancel_left {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : t \ (t \ s) = s :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
#align set.diff_diff_cancel_left Set.diff_diff_cancel_left
theorem mem_diff_singleton {x y : α} {s : Set α} : x ∈ s \ {y} ↔ x ∈ s ∧ x ≠ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_diff_singleton Set.mem_diff_singleton
theorem mem_diff_singleton_empty {t : Set (Set α)} : s ∈ t \ {∅} ↔ s ∈ t ∧ s.Nonempty :=
mem_diff_singleton.trans <| and_congr_right' nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align set.mem_diff_singleton_empty Set.mem_diff_singleton_empty
theorem subset_insert_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
s ⊆ insert x t ↔ s ⊆ t ∨ (x ∈ s ∧ s \ {x} ⊆ t) := by
rw [← diff_singleton_subset_iff]
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [and_iff_right hx, or_iff_right_of_imp diff_subset.trans]
rw [diff_singleton_eq_self hx, or_iff_left_of_imp And.right]
theorem union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter (s t : Set α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
#align set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter Set.union_eq_diff_union_diff_union_inter
/-! ### Lemmas about pairs -/
--Porting note (#10618): removed `simp` attribute because `simp` can prove it
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Set α) = {a} :=
union_self _
#align set.pair_eq_singleton Set.pair_eq_singleton
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Set α) = {b, a} :=
union_comm _ _
#align set.pair_comm Set.pair_comm
theorem pair_eq_pair_iff {x y z w : α} :
({x, y} : Set α) = {z, w} ↔ x = z ∧ y = w ∨ x = w ∧ y = z := by
simp [subset_antisymm_iff, insert_subset_iff]; aesop
#align set.pair_eq_pair_iff Set.pair_eq_pair_iff
theorem pair_diff_left (hne : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α) \ {a} = {b} := by
rw [insert_diff_of_mem _ (mem_singleton a), diff_singleton_eq_self (by simpa)]
theorem pair_diff_right (hne : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α) \ {b} = {a} := by
rw [pair_comm, pair_diff_left hne.symm]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 2,088 | 2,089 | theorem pair_subset_iff : {a, b} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s := by |
rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
#align_import dynamics.circle.rotation_number.translation_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift extends ℝ →o ℝ : Type where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
#align circle_deg1_lift CircleDeg1Lift
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mk CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mk
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
#align circle_deg1_lift.monotone CircleDeg1Lift.monotone
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
#align circle_deg1_lift.mono CircleDeg1Lift.mono
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
#align circle_deg1_lift.strict_mono_iff_injective CircleDeg1Lift.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_one
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_one_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_one_add
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.coe_inj -- Use `DFunLike.coe_inj`
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext CircleDeg1Lift.ext
theorem ext_iff {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : f = g ↔ ∀ x, f x = g x :=
DFunLike.ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.ext_iff CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one f := rfl
one_mul f := rfl
mul_assoc f₁ f₂ f₃ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_mul CircleDeg1Lift.coe_mul
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_apply CircleDeg1Lift.mul_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_one CircleDeg1Lift.coe_one
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_has_coe_to_fun CircleDeg1Lift.unitsHasCoeToFun
#noalign circle_deg1_lift.units_coe -- now LHS = RHS
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_inv_apply_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_inv_apply_apply
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
#align circle_deg1_lift.units_apply_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.units_apply_inv_apply
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' f g := rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_symm CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_symm
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_to_order_iso_inv CircleDeg1Lift.coe_toOrderIso_inv
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.is_unit_iff_bijective CircleDeg1Lift.isUnit_iff_bijective
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
#align circle_deg1_lift.coe_pow CircleDeg1Lift.coe_pow
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.semiconj_by_iff_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.semiconjBy_iff_semiconj
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
ext_iff
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_iff_commute CircleDeg1Lift.commute_iff_commute
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => Multiplicative.toAdd x + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate CircleDeg1Lift.translate
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_inv_apply CircleDeg1Lift.translate_inv_apply
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translate_pow
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translate_iterate CircleDeg1Lift.translate_iterate
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_nat_add
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_nat
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_nat
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_add_int
theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.commute_int_add
theorem commute_sub_int (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_int n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
#align circle_deg1_lift.commute_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.commute_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_int_add (m : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : f (m + x) = m + f x :=
f.commute_int_add m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_add
@[simp]
theorem map_add_int (x : ℝ) (m : ℤ) : f (x + m) = f x + m :=
f.commute_add_int m x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_int
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_int (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.commute_sub_int n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n :=
f.map_add_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem map_nat_add (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : f (n + x) = n + f x :=
f.map_int_add n x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_nat_add CircleDeg1Lift.map_nat_add
@[simp]
theorem map_sub_nat (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : f (x - n) = f x - n :=
f.map_sub_int x n
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_sub_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_sub_nat
theorem map_int_of_map_zero (n : ℤ) : f n = f 0 + n := by rw [← f.map_add_int, zero_add]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_int_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_int_of_map_zero
@[simp]
theorem map_fract_sub_fract_eq (x : ℝ) : f (fract x) - fract x = f x - x := by
rw [Int.fract, f.map_sub_int, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq CircleDeg1Lift.map_fract_sub_fract_eq
/-!
### Pointwise order on circle maps
-/
/-- Monotone circle maps form a lattice with respect to the pointwise order -/
noncomputable instance : Lattice CircleDeg1Lift where
sup f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => max (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => max_le_max (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
-- TODO: generalize to `Monotone.max`
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [max_add_add_right] }
le f g := ∀ x, f x ≤ g x
le_refl f x := le_refl (f x)
le_trans f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁₂ h₂₃ x := le_trans (h₁₂ x) (h₂₃ x)
le_antisymm f₁ f₂ h₁₂ h₂₁ := ext fun x => le_antisymm (h₁₂ x) (h₂₁ x)
le_sup_left f g x := le_max_left (f x) (g x)
le_sup_right f g x := le_max_right (f x) (g x)
sup_le f₁ f₂ f₃ h₁ h₂ x := max_le (h₁ x) (h₂ x)
inf f g :=
{ toFun := fun x => min (f x) (g x)
monotone' := fun x y h => min_le_min (f.mono h) (g.mono h)
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [min_add_add_right] }
inf_le_left f g x := min_le_left (f x) (g x)
inf_le_right f g x := min_le_right (f x) (g x)
le_inf f₁ f₂ f₃ h₂ h₃ x := le_min (h₂ x) (h₃ x)
@[simp]
theorem sup_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊔ g) x = max (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.sup_apply CircleDeg1Lift.sup_apply
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (x : ℝ) : (f ⊓ g) x = min (f x) (g x) :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.inf_apply CircleDeg1Lift.inf_apply
theorem iterate_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f^[n] := fun f _ h =>
f.monotone.iterate_le_of_le h _
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_monotone
theorem iterate_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f^[n] ≤ g^[n] :=
iterate_monotone n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_mono CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_mono
theorem pow_mono {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : f ≤ g) (n : ℕ) : f ^ n ≤ g ^ n := fun x => by
simp only [coe_pow, iterate_mono h n x]
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_mono CircleDeg1Lift.pow_mono
theorem pow_monotone (n : ℕ) : Monotone fun f : CircleDeg1Lift => f ^ n := fun _ _ h => pow_mono h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.pow_monotone CircleDeg1Lift.pow_monotone
/-!
### Estimates on `(f * g) 0`
We prove the estimates `f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉` and some corollaries with added/removed
floors and ceils.
We also prove that for two semiconjugate maps `g₁`, `g₂`, the distance between `g₁ 0` and `g₂ 0`
is less than two.
-/
theorem map_le_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f x ≤ f 0 + ⌈x⌉ :=
calc
f x ≤ f ⌈x⌉ := f.monotone <| le_ceil _
_ = f 0 + ⌈x⌉ := f.map_int_of_map_zero _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_le_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.map_le_of_map_zero
theorem map_map_zero_le : f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
f.map_le_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_le
theorem floor_map_map_zero_le : ⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌊f (g 0)⌋ ≤ ⌊f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌋ := floor_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌈g 0⌉ := floor_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.floor_map_map_zero_le
theorem ceil_map_map_zero_le : ⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f (g 0)⌉ ≤ ⌈f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.map_map_zero_le g
_ = ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌈g 0⌉ := ceil_add_int _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le CircleDeg1Lift.ceil_map_map_zero_le
theorem map_map_zero_lt : f (g 0) < f 0 + g 0 + 1 :=
calc
f (g 0) ≤ f 0 + ⌈g 0⌉ := f.map_map_zero_le g
_ < f 0 + (g 0 + 1) := add_lt_add_left (ceil_lt_add_one _) _
_ = f 0 + g 0 + 1 := (add_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.map_map_zero_lt
theorem le_map_of_map_zero (x : ℝ) : f 0 + ⌊x⌋ ≤ f x :=
calc
f 0 + ⌊x⌋ = f ⌊x⌋ := (f.map_int_of_map_zero _).symm
_ ≤ f x := f.monotone <| floor_le _
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_of_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_of_map_zero
theorem le_map_map_zero : f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ f (g 0) :=
f.le_map_of_map_zero (g 0)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_map_map_zero
theorem le_floor_map_map_zero : ⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ :=
calc
⌊f 0⌋ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌊f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌋ := (floor_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌊f (g 0)⌋ := floor_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_floor_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_floor_map_map_zero
theorem le_ceil_map_map_zero : ⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ ≤ ⌈(f * g) 0⌉ :=
calc
⌈f 0⌉ + ⌊g 0⌋ = ⌈f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋⌉ := (ceil_add_int _ _).symm
_ ≤ ⌈f (g 0)⌉ := ceil_mono <| f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.le_ceil_map_map_zero
theorem lt_map_map_zero : f 0 + g 0 - 1 < f (g 0) :=
calc
f 0 + g 0 - 1 = f 0 + (g 0 - 1) := add_sub_assoc _ _ _
_ < f 0 + ⌊g 0⌋ := add_lt_add_left (sub_one_lt_floor _) _
_ ≤ f (g 0) := f.le_map_map_zero g
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_map_zero CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_map_zero
theorem dist_map_map_zero_lt : dist (f 0 + g 0) (f (g 0)) < 1 := by
rw [dist_comm, Real.dist_eq, abs_lt, lt_sub_iff_add_lt', sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact ⟨f.lt_map_map_zero g, f.map_map_zero_lt g⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_map_zero_lt
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
calc
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) ≤ dist (g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0) - f 0) + dist _ (g₂ 0) := dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = dist (f 0 + g₁ 0) (f (g₁ 0)) + dist (g₂ 0 + f 0) (g₂ (f 0)) := by
simp only [h.eq, Real.dist_eq, sub_sub, add_comm (f 0), sub_sub_eq_add_sub,
abs_sub_comm (g₂ (f 0))]
_ < 1 + 1 := add_lt_add (f.dist_map_map_zero_lt g₁) (g₂.dist_map_map_zero_lt f)
_ = 2 := one_add_one_eq_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj
theorem dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
dist (g₁ 0) (g₂ 0) < 2 :=
dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.1 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy
/-!
### Limits at infinities and continuity
-/
protected theorem tendsto_atBot : Tendsto f atBot atBot :=
tendsto_atBot_mono f.map_le_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atBot_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atBot_mono fun x => (ceil_lt_add_one x).le) <|
tendsto_atBot_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_bot CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atBot
protected theorem tendsto_atTop : Tendsto f atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_mono f.le_map_of_map_zero <| tendsto_atTop_add_const_left _ _ <|
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun x => (sub_one_lt_floor x).le) <| by
simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using tendsto_atTop_add_const_right _ _ tendsto_id
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_at_top CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_atTop
theorem continuous_iff_surjective : Continuous f ↔ Function.Surjective f :=
⟨fun h => h.surjective f.tendsto_atTop f.tendsto_atBot, f.monotone.continuous_of_surjective⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.continuous_iff_surjective CircleDeg1Lift.continuous_iff_surjective
/-!
### Estimates on `(f^n) x`
If we know that `f x` is `≤`/`<`/`≥`/`>`/`=` to `x + m`, then we have a similar estimate on
`f^[n] x` and `x + n * m`.
For `≤`, `≥`, and `=` we formulate both `of` (implication) and `iff` versions because implications
work for `n = 0`. For `<` and `>` we formulate only `iff` versions.
-/
theorem iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_le_of_map_le f.monotone (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int
theorem le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) (n : ℕ) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).symm.iterate_le_of_map_le (monotone_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) f.monotone h n
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
theorem iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) (n : ℕ) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using (f.commute_add_int m).iterate_eq_of_map_eq n h
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_eq_of_map_eq_add_int
theorem iterate_pos_le_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x ≤ x + n * m ↔ f x ≤ x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_le_iff_map_le f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_le_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_le_iff
theorem iterate_pos_lt_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x < x + n * m ↔ f x < x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_lt_iff_map_lt f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_lt_iff
theorem iterate_pos_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
f^[n] x = x + n * m ↔ f x = x + m := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul, add_right_iterate] using
(f.commute_add_int m).iterate_pos_eq_iff_map_eq f.monotone (strictMono_id.add_const (m : ℝ)) hn
#align circle_deg1_lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff CircleDeg1Lift.iterate_pos_eq_iff
theorem le_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m ≤ f^[n] x ↔ x + m ≤ f x := by
simpa only [not_lt] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_lt_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.le_iterate_pos_iff
theorem lt_iterate_pos_iff {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
x + n * m < f^[n] x ↔ x + m < f x := by
simpa only [not_le] using not_congr (f.iterate_pos_le_iff hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff CircleDeg1Lift.lt_iterate_pos_iff
theorem mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero (n : ℕ) : ↑n * ⌊f 0⌋ ≤ ⌊f^[n] 0⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, ← zero_add ((n : ℝ) * _)]
apply le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map
simp [floor_le]
#align circle_deg1_lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero CircleDeg1Lift.mul_floor_map_zero_le_floor_iterate_zero
/-!
### Definition of translation number
-/
noncomputable section
/-- An auxiliary sequence used to define the translation number. -/
def transnumAuxSeq (n : ℕ) : ℝ :=
(f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq
/-- The translation number of a `CircleDeg1Lift`, $τ(f)=\lim_{n→∞}\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$. We use
an auxiliary sequence `\frac{f^{2^n}(0)}{2^n}` to define `τ(f)` because some proofs are simpler
this way. -/
def translationNumber : ℝ :=
limUnder atTop f.transnumAuxSeq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber
end
-- TODO: choose two different symbols for `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber` and the future
-- `circle_mono_homeo.rotation_number`, then make them `localized notation`s
local notation "τ" => translationNumber
theorem transnumAuxSeq_def : f.transnumAuxSeq = fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (2 ^ n : ℕ)) 0 / 2 ^ n :=
rfl
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_def CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_def
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux {τ' : ℝ} (h : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 τ')) :
τ f = τ' :=
h.limUnder_eq
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto_aux CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n] 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <| by
simpa [(· ∘ ·), transnumAuxSeq_def, coe_pow] using
h.comp (Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀ CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' {τ' : ℝ}
(h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f^[n + 1] 0 / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 τ')) : τ f = τ' :=
f.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ <| (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast h)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_tendsto₀' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀'
theorem transnumAuxSeq_zero : f.transnumAuxSeq 0 = f 0 := by simp [transnumAuxSeq]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_zero CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_zero
theorem transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt (n : ℕ) :
dist (f.transnumAuxSeq n) (f.transnumAuxSeq (n + 1)) < 1 / 2 / 2 ^ n := by
have : 0 < (2 ^ (n + 1) : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
rw [div_div, ← pow_succ', ← abs_of_pos this]
replace := abs_pos.2 (ne_of_gt this)
convert (div_lt_div_right this).2 ((f ^ 2 ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (f ^ 2 ^ n)) using 1
simp_rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq]
rw [← abs_div, sub_div, pow_succ, pow_succ', ← two_mul, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
pow_mul, sq, mul_apply]
#align circle_deg1_lift.transnum_aux_seq_dist_lt CircleDeg1Lift.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_aux : Tendsto f.transnumAuxSeq atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(cauchySeq_of_le_geometric_two 1 fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n).tendsto_limUnder
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
theorem dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le : dist (f 0) (τ f) ≤ 1 :=
f.transnumAuxSeq_zero ▸
dist_le_of_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto₀ 1 (fun n => le_of_lt <| f.transnumAuxSeq_dist_lt n)
f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_map_zero_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux (x : ℕ → ℝ) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) (x n) ≤ C) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => x (2 ^ n) / 2 ^ n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
apply f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.congr_dist (squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) _ _)
· exact fun n => C / 2 ^ n
· intro n
have : 0 < (2 ^ n : ℝ) := pow_pos zero_lt_two _
convert (div_le_div_right this).2 (H (2 ^ n)) using 1
rw [transnumAuxSeq, Real.dist_eq, ← sub_div, abs_div, abs_of_pos this, Real.dist_eq]
· exact mul_zero C ▸ tendsto_const_nhds.mul <| tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp <|
tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt one_lt_two
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number_of_dist_bounded_aux CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ n : ℕ, dist ((f ^ n) 0) ((g ^ n) 0) ≤ C) : τ f = τ g :=
Eq.symm <| g.translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto_aux <|
f.tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux _ C H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_dist_bounded CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_one : τ 1 = 0 :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀ _ <| by simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_one CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_one
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} (H : SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂) :
τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded 2 fun n =>
le_of_lt <| dist_map_zero_lt_of_semiconjBy <| H.pow_right n
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj_by CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy
theorem translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift}
(H : Function.Semiconj f g₁ g₂) : τ g₁ = τ g₂ :=
translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy <| semiconjBy_iff_semiconj.2 H
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_eq_of_semiconj CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconj
theorem translationNumber_mul_of_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} (h : Commute f g) :
τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_
(f.tendsto_translationNumber_aux.add g.tendsto_translationNumber_aux)
simp only [transnumAuxSeq, ← add_div]
refine (f * g).tendsto_translationNumber_of_dist_bounded_aux
(fun n ↦ (f ^ n) 0 + (g ^ n) 0) 1 fun n ↦ ?_
rw [h.mul_pow, dist_comm]
exact le_of_lt ((f ^ n).dist_map_map_zero_lt (g ^ n))
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mul_of_commute CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_units_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : τ ↑f⁻¹ = -τ f :=
eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero.2 <| by
simp [← translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.refl _).units_inv_left]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_units_inv CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, τ (f ^ n) = n * τ f
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
rw [pow_succ, translationNumber_mul_of_commute (Commute.pow_self f n),
translationNumber_pow n, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, one_mul]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_pow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_pow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_zpow (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ∀ n : ℤ, τ (f ^ n : Units _) = n * τ f
| (n : ℕ) => by simp [translationNumber_pow f n]
| -[n+1] => by simp; ring
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_zpow CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_zpow
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f * g * ↑f⁻¹) = τ g :=
(translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy (f.mk_semiconjBy g)).symm
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq
@[simp]
theorem translationNumber_conj_eq' (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (g : CircleDeg1Lift) :
τ (↑f⁻¹ * g * f) = τ g :=
translationNumber_conj_eq f⁻¹ g
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_conj_eq' CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_conj_eq'
theorem dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le (n : ℕ) :
dist ((f ^ n) 0) (n * f.translationNumber) ≤ 1 :=
f.translationNumber_pow n ▸ (f ^ n).dist_map_zero_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translation_number_le CircleDeg1Lift.dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀' :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) 0 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
refine
tendsto_iff_dist_tendsto_zero.2 <|
squeeze_zero (fun _ => dist_nonneg) (fun n => ?_)
((tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1).comp (tendsto_add_atTop_nat 1))
dsimp
have : (0 : ℝ) < n + 1 := n.cast_add_one_pos
rw [Real.dist_eq, div_sub' _ _ _ (ne_of_gt this), abs_div, ← Real.dist_eq, abs_of_pos this,
Nat.cast_add_one, div_le_div_right this, ← Nat.cast_add_one]
apply dist_pow_map_zero_mul_translationNumber_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀'
theorem tendsto_translation_number₀ : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (f ^ n) 0 / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).1 (mod_cast f.tendsto_translation_number₀')
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number₀ CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number₀
/-- For any `x : ℝ` the sequence $\frac{f^n(x)-x}{n}$ tends to the translation number of `f`.
In particular, this limit does not depend on `x`. -/
theorem tendsto_translationNumber (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ n) x - x) / n) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) := by
rw [← translationNumber_conj_eq' (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)]
refine (tendsto_translation_number₀ _).congr fun n ↦ ?_
simp [sub_eq_neg_add, Units.conj_pow']
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translationNumber
theorem tendsto_translation_number' (x : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((f ^ (n + 1) : CircleDeg1Lift) x - x) / (n + 1)) atTop (𝓝 <| τ f) :=
mod_cast (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (f.tendsto_translationNumber x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.tendsto_translation_number' CircleDeg1Lift.tendsto_translation_number'
theorem translationNumber_mono : Monotone τ := fun f g h =>
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' f.tendsto_translation_number₀ g.tendsto_translation_number₀ fun n => by
gcongr; exact pow_mono h _ _
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_mono CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mono
theorem translationNumber_translate (x : ℝ) : τ (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x) = x :=
translationNumber_eq_of_tendsto₀' _ <| by
simp only [translate_iterate, translate_apply, add_zero, Nat.cast_succ,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (M₀ := ℝ) _ (Nat.cast_add_one_ne_zero _), tendsto_const_nhds]
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_translate CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_translate
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x ≤ x + z) : τ f ≤ z :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (hz x).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_le {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, x + z ≤ f x) : z ≤ τ f :=
translationNumber_translate z ▸ translationNumber_mono fun x => (add_comm _ _).trans_le (hz x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_le
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
le_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(div_le_iff' (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <|
(coe_pow f (n + 1)).symm ▸ @Nat.cast_add_one ℝ _ n ▸ f.iterate_le_of_map_le_add_int h (n + 1)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int
theorem translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : f x ≤ x + m) : τ f ≤ m :=
@translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_of_le_add_nat CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_nat
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
ge_of_tendsto' (f.tendsto_translation_number' x) fun n =>
(le_div_iff (n.cast_add_one_pos : (0 : ℝ) < _)).mpr <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.2 <| by
simp only [coe_pow, mul_comm (m : ℝ), ← Nat.cast_add_one, f.le_iterate_of_add_int_le_map h]
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_int_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le
theorem le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le {x : ℝ} {m : ℕ} (h : x + m ≤ f x) : ↑m ≤ τ f :=
@le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f x m h
#align circle_deg1_lift.le_translation_number_of_add_nat_le CircleDeg1Lift.le_translationNumber_of_add_nat_le
/-- If `f x - x` is an integer number `m` for some point `x`, then `τ f = m`.
On the circle this means that a map with a fixed point has rotation number zero. -/
theorem translationNumber_of_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {m : ℤ} (h : f x = x + m) : τ f = m :=
le_antisymm (translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| le_of_eq h)
(le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_of_eq h.symm)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_eq_add_int
theorem floor_sub_le_translationNumber (x : ℝ) : ↑⌊f x - x⌋ ≤ τ f :=
le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le f <| le_sub_iff_add_le'.1 (floor_le <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.floor_sub_le_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.floor_sub_le_translationNumber
theorem translationNumber_le_ceil_sub (x : ℝ) : τ f ≤ ⌈f x - x⌉ :=
translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int f <| sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 (le_ceil <| f x - x)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_le_ceil_sub CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_le_ceil_sub
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int {n : ℤ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.le_translationNumber_of_add_int_le <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_int CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int
theorem map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat {n : ℕ} (h : τ f < n) (x : ℝ) : f x < x + n :=
@map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_of_translation_number_lt_nat CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_nat
theorem map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := by
rw [add_assoc]
norm_cast
refine map_lt_of_translationNumber_lt_int _ ?_ _
push_cast
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_floor_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one
theorem map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one (x : ℝ) : f x < x + τ f + 1 :=
calc
f x < x + ⌊τ f⌋ + 1 := f.map_lt_add_floor_translationNumber_add_one x
_ ≤ x + τ f + 1 := by gcongr; apply floor_le
#align circle_deg1_lift.map_lt_add_translation_number_add_one CircleDeg1Lift.map_lt_add_translationNumber_add_one
theorem lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber {n : ℤ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
not_le.1 <| mt f.translationNumber_le_of_le_add_int <| not_le.2 h
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber
theorem lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber {n : ℕ} (h : ↑n < τ f) (x : ℝ) : x + n < f x :=
@lt_map_of_int_lt_translationNumber f n h x
#align circle_deg1_lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translation_number CircleDeg1Lift.lt_map_of_nat_lt_translationNumber
/-- If `f^n x - x`, `n > 0`, is an integer number `m` for some point `x`, then
`τ f = m / n`. On the circle this means that a map with a periodic orbit has
a rational rotation number. -/
theorem translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int {x : ℝ} {n : ℕ} {m : ℤ} (h : (f ^ n) x = x + m)
(hn : 0 < n) : τ f = m / n := by
have := (f ^ n).translationNumber_of_eq_add_int h
rwa [translationNumber_pow, mul_comm, ← eq_div_iff] at this
exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt hn)
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_of_map_pow_eq_add_int CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_of_map_pow_eq_add_int
/-- If a predicate depends only on `f x - x` and holds for all `0 ≤ x ≤ 1`,
then it holds for all `x`. -/
theorem forall_map_sub_of_Icc (P : ℝ → Prop) (h : ∀ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, P (f x - x)) (x : ℝ) :
P (f x - x) :=
f.map_fract_sub_fract_eq x ▸ h _ ⟨fract_nonneg _, le_of_lt (fract_lt_one _)⟩
#align circle_deg1_lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc CircleDeg1Lift.forall_map_sub_of_Icc
theorem translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add (hf : Continuous f) {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, f x < x + z) :
τ f < z := by
obtain ⟨x, -, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, f y - y ≤ f x - x :=
isCompact_Icc.exists_isMaxOn (nonempty_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
(hf.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.2 <| hz x)
apply translationNumber_le_of_le_add
simp only [← sub_le_iff_le_add']
exact f.forall_map_sub_of_Icc (fun a => a ≤ f x - x) hx
#align circle_deg1_lift.translation_number_lt_of_forall_lt_add CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_lt_of_forall_lt_add
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 917 | 925 | theorem lt_translationNumber_of_forall_add_lt (hf : Continuous f) {z : ℝ} (hz : ∀ x, x + z < f x) :
z < τ f := by |
obtain ⟨x, -, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, ∀ y ∈ Icc (0 : ℝ) 1, f x - x ≤ f y - y
· exact isCompact_Icc.exists_isMinOn (nonempty_Icc.2 zero_le_one)
(hf.sub continuous_id).continuousOn
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_sub_iff_add_lt'.2 <| hz x) ?_
apply le_translationNumber_of_add_le
simp only [← le_sub_iff_add_le']
exact f.forall_map_sub_of_Icc _ hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Colimits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Limits
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.LocalPredicate
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.AtPrime
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Subring.Basic
#align_import algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5dc6092d09e5e489106865241986f7f2ad28d4c8"
/-!
# The structure sheaf on `PrimeSpectrum R`.
We define the structure sheaf on `TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)`, for a commutative ring `R` and prove
basic properties about it. We define this as a subsheaf of the sheaf of dependent functions into the
localizations, cut out by the condition that the function must be locally equal to a ratio of
elements of `R`.
Because the condition "is equal to a fraction" passes to smaller open subsets,
the subset of functions satisfying this condition is automatically a subpresheaf.
Because the condition "is locally equal to a fraction" is local,
it is also a subsheaf.
(It may be helpful to refer back to `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/SheafOfFunctions.lean`,
where we show that dependent functions into any type family form a sheaf,
and also `Mathlib/Topology/Sheaves/LocalPredicate.lean`, where we characterise the predicates
which pick out sub-presheaves and sub-sheaves of these sheaves.)
We also set up the ring structure, obtaining
`structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)`.
We then construct two basic isomorphisms, relating the structure sheaf to the underlying ring `R`.
First, `StructureSheaf.stalkIso` gives an isomorphism between the stalk of the structure sheaf
at a point `p` and the localization of `R` at the prime ideal `p`. Second,
`StructureSheaf.basicOpenIso` gives an isomorphism between the structure sheaf on `basicOpen f`
and the localization of `R` at the submonoid of powers of `f`.
## References
* [Robin Hartshorne, *Algebraic Geometry*][Har77]
-/
universe u
noncomputable section
variable (R : Type u) [CommRing R]
open TopCat
open TopologicalSpace
open CategoryTheory
open Opposite
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
/-- The prime spectrum, just as a topological space.
-/
def PrimeSpectrum.Top : TopCat :=
TopCat.of (PrimeSpectrum R)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.prime_spectrum.Top AlgebraicGeometry.PrimeSpectrum.Top
namespace StructureSheaf
/-- The type family over `PrimeSpectrum R` consisting of the localization over each point.
-/
def Localizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Type u :=
Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.localizations AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.Localizations
-- Porting note: can't derive `CommRingCat`
instance commRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : CommRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| CommRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
-- Porting note: can't derive `LocalRing`
instance localRingLocalizations (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : LocalRing <| Localizations R P :=
inferInstanceAs <| LocalRing <| Localization.AtPrime P.asIdeal
instance (P : PrimeSpectrum.Top R) : Inhabited (Localizations R P) :=
⟨1⟩
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) : Algebra R (Localizations R x) :=
inferInstanceAs <| Algebra R (Localization.AtPrime x.1.asIdeal)
instance (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (x : U) :
IsLocalization.AtPrime (Localizations R x) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal :=
Localization.isLocalization
variable {R}
/-- The predicate saying that a dependent function on an open `U` is realised as a fixed fraction
`r / s` in each of the stalks (which are localizations at various prime ideals).
-/
def IsFraction {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) : Prop :=
∃ r s : R, ∀ x : U, ¬s ∈ x.1.asIdeal ∧ f x * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.is_fraction AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.IsFraction
theorem IsFraction.eq_mk' {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} {f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x}
(hf : IsFraction f) :
∃ r s : R,
∀ x : U,
∃ hs : s ∉ x.1.asIdeal,
f x =
IsLocalization.mk' (Localization.AtPrime _) r
(⟨s, hs⟩ : (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) := by
rcases hf with ⟨r, s, h⟩
refine ⟨r, s, fun x => ⟨(h x).1, (IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.mpr ?_).symm⟩⟩
exact (h x).2.symm
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.is_fraction.eq_mk' AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.IsFraction.eq_mk'
variable (R)
/-- The predicate `IsFraction` is "prelocal",
in the sense that if it holds on `U` it holds on any open subset `V` of `U`.
-/
def isFractionPrelocal : PrelocalPredicate (Localizations R) where
pred {U} f := IsFraction f
res := by rintro V U i f ⟨r, s, w⟩; exact ⟨r, s, fun x => w (i x)⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.is_fraction_prelocal AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.isFractionPrelocal
/-- We will define the structure sheaf as
the subsheaf of all dependent functions in `Π x : U, Localizations R x`
consisting of those functions which can locally be expressed as a ratio of
(the images in the localization of) elements of `R`.
Quoting Hartshorne:
For an open set $U ⊆ Spec A$, we define $𝒪(U)$ to be the set of functions
$s : U → ⨆_{𝔭 ∈ U} A_𝔭$, such that $s(𝔭) ∈ A_𝔭$ for each $𝔭$,
and such that $s$ is locally a quotient of elements of $A$:
to be precise, we require that for each $𝔭 ∈ U$, there is a neighborhood $V$ of $𝔭$,
contained in $U$, and elements $a, f ∈ A$, such that for each $𝔮 ∈ V, f ∉ 𝔮$,
and $s(𝔮) = a/f$ in $A_𝔮$.
Now Hartshorne had the disadvantage of not knowing about dependent functions,
so we replace his circumlocution about functions into a disjoint union with
`Π x : U, Localizations x`.
-/
def isLocallyFraction : LocalPredicate (Localizations R) :=
(isFractionPrelocal R).sheafify
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.is_locally_fraction AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.isLocallyFraction
@[simp]
theorem isLocallyFraction_pred {U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)} (f : ∀ x : U, Localizations R x) :
(isLocallyFraction R).pred f =
∀ x : U,
∃ (V : _) (_ : x.1 ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U),
∃ r s : R,
∀ y : V, ¬s ∈ y.1.asIdeal ∧ f (i y : U) * algebraMap _ _ s = algebraMap _ _ r :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.is_locally_fraction_pred AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.isLocallyFraction_pred
/-- The functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction` form a subring.
-/
def sectionsSubring (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
Subring (∀ x : U.unop, Localizations R x) where
carrier := { f | (isLocallyFraction R).pred f }
zero_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 0, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.IsPrime.1
· simp
one_mem' := by
refine fun x => ⟨unop U, x.2, 𝟙 _, 1, 1, fun y => ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← Ideal.ne_top_iff_one]; exact y.1.IsPrime.1
· simp
add_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * sb + rb * sa, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ y) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ y) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.1.IsPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [add_mul, RingHom.map_add, Pi.add_apply, RingHom.map_mul]
erw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_assoc]
congr 2
rw [mul_comm]
neg_mem' := by
intro a ha x
rcases ha x with ⟨V, m, i, r, s, w⟩
refine ⟨V, m, i, -r, s, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases w y with ⟨nm, w⟩
fconstructor
· exact nm
· simp only [RingHom.map_neg, Pi.neg_apply]
erw [← w]
simp only [neg_mul]
mul_mem' := by
intro a b ha hb x
rcases ha x with ⟨Va, ma, ia, ra, sa, wa⟩
rcases hb x with ⟨Vb, mb, ib, rb, sb, wb⟩
refine ⟨Va ⊓ Vb, ⟨ma, mb⟩, Opens.infLELeft _ _ ≫ ia, ra * rb, sa * sb, ?_⟩
intro y
rcases wa (Opens.infLELeft _ _ y) with ⟨nma, wa⟩
rcases wb (Opens.infLERight _ _ y) with ⟨nmb, wb⟩
fconstructor
· intro H; cases y.1.IsPrime.mem_or_mem H <;> contradiction
· simp only [Pi.mul_apply, RingHom.map_mul]
erw [← wa, ← wb]
simp only [mul_left_comm, mul_assoc, mul_comm]
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.sections_subring AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.sectionsSubring
end StructureSheaf
open StructureSheaf
/-- The structure sheaf (valued in `Type`, not yet `CommRingCat`) is the subsheaf consisting of
functions satisfying `isLocallyFraction`.
-/
def structureSheafInType : Sheaf (Type u) (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
subsheafToTypes (isLocallyFraction R)
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf_in_Type AlgebraicGeometry.structureSheafInType
instance commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj (U : (Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))ᵒᵖ) :
CommRing ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U) :=
(sectionsSubring R U).toCommRing
#align algebraic_geometry.comm_ring_structure_sheaf_in_Type_obj AlgebraicGeometry.commRingStructureSheafInTypeObj
open PrimeSpectrum
/-- The structure presheaf, valued in `CommRingCat`, constructed by dressing up the `Type` valued
structure presheaf.
-/
@[simps]
def structurePresheafInCommRing : Presheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) where
obj U := CommRingCat.of ((structureSheafInType R).1.obj U)
map {U V} i :=
{ toFun := (structureSheafInType R).1.map i
map_zero' := rfl
map_add' := fun x y => rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' := fun x y => rfl }
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_presheaf_in_CommRing AlgebraicGeometry.structurePresheafInCommRing
-- These lemmas have always been bad (#7657), but leanprover/lean4#2644 made `simp` start noticing
attribute [nolint simpNF] AlgebraicGeometry.structurePresheafInCommRing_map_apply
/-- Some glue, verifying that the structure presheaf valued in `CommRingCat` agrees
with the `Type` valued structure presheaf.
-/
def structurePresheafCompForget :
structurePresheafInCommRing R ⋙ forget CommRingCat ≅ (structureSheafInType R).1 :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun U => Iso.refl _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_presheaf_comp_forget AlgebraicGeometry.structurePresheafCompForget
open TopCat.Presheaf
/-- The structure sheaf on $Spec R$, valued in `CommRingCat`.
This is provided as a bundled `SheafedSpace` as `Spec.SheafedSpace R` later.
-/
def Spec.structureSheaf : Sheaf CommRingCat (PrimeSpectrum.Top R) :=
⟨structurePresheafInCommRing R,
(-- We check the sheaf condition under `forget CommRingCat`.
isSheaf_iff_isSheaf_comp
_ _).mpr
(isSheaf_of_iso (structurePresheafCompForget R).symm (structureSheafInType R).cond)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align algebraic_geometry.Spec.structure_sheaf AlgebraicGeometry.Spec.structureSheaf
open Spec (structureSheaf)
namespace StructureSheaf
@[simp]
theorem res_apply (U V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (i : V ⟶ U)
(s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : V) :
((structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s).1 x = (s.1 (i x) : _) :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.res_apply AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.res_apply
/-
Notation in this comment
X = Spec R
OX = structure sheaf
In the following we construct an isomorphism between OX_p and R_p given any point p corresponding
to a prime ideal in R.
We do this via 8 steps:
1. def const (f g : R) (V) (hv : V ≤ D_g) : OX(V) [for api]
2. def toOpen (U) : R ⟶ OX(U)
3. [2] def toStalk (p : Spec R) : R ⟶ OX_p
4. [2] def toBasicOpen (f : R) : R_f ⟶ OX(D_f)
5. [3] def localizationToStalk (p : Spec R) : R_p ⟶ OX_p
6. def openToLocalization (U) (p) (hp : p ∈ U) : OX(U) ⟶ R_p
7. [6] def stalkToFiberRingHom (p : Spec R) : OX_p ⟶ R_p
8. [5,7] def stalkIso (p : Spec R) : OX_p ≅ R_p
In the square brackets we list the dependencies of a construction on the previous steps.
-/
/-- The section of `structureSheaf R` on an open `U` sending each `x ∈ U` to the element
`f/g` in the localization of `R` at `x`. -/
def const (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U) :=
⟨fun x => IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩, fun x =>
⟨U, x.2, 𝟙 _, f, g, fun y => ⟨hu y y.2, IsLocalization.mk'_spec _ _ _⟩⟩⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const
@[simp]
theorem const_apply (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hu x x.2⟩ :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_apply AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_apply
theorem const_apply' (f g : R) (U : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R))
(hu : ∀ x ∈ U, g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) (x : U)
(hx : g ∈ (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R).asIdeal.primeCompl) :
(const R f g U hu).1 x = IsLocalization.mk' _ f ⟨g, hx⟩ :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_apply' AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_apply'
theorem exists_const (U) (s : (structureSheaf R).1.obj (op U)) (x : PrimeSpectrum.Top R)
(hx : x ∈ U) :
∃ (V : Opens (PrimeSpectrum.Top R)) (_ : x ∈ V) (i : V ⟶ U) (f g : R) (hg : _),
const R f g V hg = (structureSheaf R).1.map i.op s :=
let ⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, hfg⟩ := s.2 ⟨x, hx⟩
⟨V, hxV, iVU, f, g, fun y hyV => (hfg ⟨y, hyV⟩).1,
Subtype.eq <| funext fun y => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| Eq.symm <| (hfg y).2⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.exists_const AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.exists_const
@[simp]
theorem res_const (f g : R) (U hu V hv i) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map i (const R f g U hu) = const R f g V hv :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.res_const AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.res_const
theorem res_const' (f g : R) (V hv) :
(structureSheaf R).1.map (homOfLE hv).op (const R f g (PrimeSpectrum.basicOpen g) fun _ => id) =
const R f g V hv :=
rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.res_const' AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.res_const'
theorem const_zero (f : R) (U hu) : const R 0 f U hu = 0 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => IsLocalization.mk'_eq_iff_eq_mul.2 <| by
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
exact (mul_eq_zero_of_left rfl ((algebraMap R (Localizations R x)) _)).symm
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_zero AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_zero
theorem const_self (f : R) (U hu) : const R f f U hu = 1 :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun _ => IsLocalization.mk'_self _ _
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_self AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_self
theorem const_one (U) : (const R 1 1 U fun _ _ => Submonoid.one_mem _) = 1 :=
const_self R 1 U _
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_one AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_one
theorem const_add (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ + const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * g₂ + f₂ * g₁) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx =>
Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <| funext fun x => Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_add _ _
⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_add AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_add
theorem const_mul (f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ * const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ =
const R (f₁ * f₂) (g₁ * g₂) U fun x hx => Submonoid.mul_mem _ (hu₁ x hx) (hu₂ x hx) :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
Eq.symm <| IsLocalization.mk'_mul _ f₁ f₂ ⟨g₁, hu₁ x x.2⟩ ⟨g₂, hu₂ x x.2⟩
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_mul AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_mul
theorem const_ext {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu₁ hu₂} (h : f₁ * g₂ = f₂ * g₁) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu₁ = const R f₂ g₂ U hu₂ :=
Subtype.eq <|
funext fun x =>
IsLocalization.mk'_eq_of_eq (by rw [mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk, ← h, mul_comm, Subtype.coe_mk])
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_ext AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_ext
theorem const_congr {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : R} {U hu} (hf : f₁ = f₂) (hg : g₁ = g₂) :
const R f₁ g₁ U hu = const R f₂ g₂ U (hg ▸ hu) := by substs hf hg; rfl
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_congr AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_congr
theorem const_mul_rev (f g : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) : const R f g U hu₁ * const R g f U hu₂ = 1 := by
rw [const_mul, const_congr R rfl (mul_comm g f), const_self]
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_mul_rev AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_mul_rev
theorem const_mul_cancel (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R f g₁ U hu₁ * const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by
rw [const_mul, const_ext]; rw [mul_assoc]
#align algebraic_geometry.structure_sheaf.const_mul_cancel AlgebraicGeometry.StructureSheaf.const_mul_cancel
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/StructureSheaf.lean | 406 | 408 | theorem const_mul_cancel' (f g₁ g₂ : R) (U hu₁ hu₂) :
const R g₁ g₂ U hu₂ * const R f g₁ U hu₁ = const R f g₂ U hu₂ := by |
rw [mul_comm, const_mul_cancel]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.Field
#align_import ring_theory.power_basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d1d69e99ed34c95266668af4e288fc1c598b9a7f"
/-!
# Power basis
This file defines a structure `PowerBasis R S`, giving a basis of the
`R`-algebra `S` as a finite list of powers `1, x, ..., x^n`.
For example, if `x` is algebraic over a ring/field, adjoining `x`
gives a `PowerBasis` structure generated by `x`.
## Definitions
* `PowerBasis R A`: a structure containing an `x` and an `n` such that
`1, x, ..., x^n` is a basis for the `R`-algebra `A` (viewed as an `R`-module).
* `finrank (hf : f ≠ 0) : FiniteDimensional.finrank K (AdjoinRoot f) = f.natDegree`,
the dimension of `AdjoinRoot f` equals the degree of `f`
* `PowerBasis.lift (pb : PowerBasis R S)`: if `y : S'` satisfies the same
equations as `pb.gen`, this is the map `S →ₐ[R] S'` sending `pb.gen` to `y`
* `PowerBasis.equiv`: if two power bases satisfy the same equations, they are
equivalent as algebras
## Implementation notes
Throughout this file, `R`, `S`, `A`, `B` ... are `CommRing`s, and `K`, `L`, ... are `Field`s.
`S` is an `R`-algebra, `B` is an `A`-algebra, `L` is a `K`-algebra.
## Tags
power basis, powerbasis
-/
open Polynomial
open Polynomial
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring S] [Algebra R S]
variable {A B : Type*} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [IsDomain B] [Algebra A B]
variable {K : Type*} [Field K]
/-- `pb : PowerBasis R S` states that `1, pb.gen, ..., pb.gen ^ (pb.dim - 1)`
is a basis for the `R`-algebra `S` (viewed as `R`-module).
This is a structure, not a class, since the same algebra can have many power bases.
For the common case where `S` is defined by adjoining an integral element to `R`,
the canonical power basis is given by `{Algebra,IntermediateField}.adjoin.powerBasis`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): this linter isn't ported yet.
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
structure PowerBasis (R S : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring S] [Algebra R S] where
gen : S
dim : ℕ
basis : Basis (Fin dim) R S
basis_eq_pow : ∀ (i), basis i = gen ^ (i : ℕ)
#align power_basis PowerBasis
-- this is usually not needed because of `basis_eq_pow` but can be needed in some cases;
-- in such circumstances, add it manually using `@[simps dim gen basis]`.
initialize_simps_projections PowerBasis (-basis)
namespace PowerBasis
@[simp]
theorem coe_basis (pb : PowerBasis R S) : ⇑pb.basis = fun i : Fin pb.dim => pb.gen ^ (i : ℕ) :=
funext pb.basis_eq_pow
#align power_basis.coe_basis PowerBasis.coe_basis
/-- Cannot be an instance because `PowerBasis` cannot be a class. -/
theorem finite (pb : PowerBasis R S) : Module.Finite R S := .of_basis pb.basis
#align power_basis.finite_dimensional PowerBasis.finite
@[deprecated] alias finiteDimensional := PowerBasis.finite
theorem finrank [StrongRankCondition R] (pb : PowerBasis R S) :
FiniteDimensional.finrank R S = pb.dim := by
rw [FiniteDimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis pb.basis, Fintype.card_fin]
#align power_basis.finrank PowerBasis.finrank
theorem mem_span_pow' {x y : S} {d : ℕ} :
y ∈ Submodule.span R (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) ↔
∃ f : R[X], f.degree < d ∧ y = aeval x f := by
have : (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) = (fun i : ℕ => x ^ i) '' ↑(Finset.range d) := by
ext n
simp_rw [Set.mem_range, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_range]
exact ⟨fun ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hy⟩ => ⟨i, hi, hy⟩, fun ⟨i, hi, hy⟩ => ⟨⟨i, hi⟩, hy⟩⟩
simp only [this, Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total, degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero, support,
exists_iff_exists_finsupp, coeff, aeval_def, eval₂RingHom', eval₂_eq_sum, Polynomial.sum,
Finsupp.mem_supported', Finsupp.total, Finsupp.sum, Algebra.smul_def, eval₂_zero, exists_prop,
LinearMap.id_coe, eval₂_one, id, not_lt, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_smulRight,
Finset.mem_range, AlgHom.coe_mks, Finset.mem_coe]
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ y]
exact Iff.rfl
#align power_basis.mem_span_pow' PowerBasis.mem_span_pow'
theorem mem_span_pow {x y : S} {d : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) :
y ∈ Submodule.span R (Set.range fun i : Fin d => x ^ (i : ℕ)) ↔
∃ f : R[X], f.natDegree < d ∧ y = aeval x f := by
rw [mem_span_pow']
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨f, h, hy⟩
refine ⟨f, ?_, hy⟩
by_cases hf : f = 0
· simp only [hf, natDegree_zero, degree_zero] at h ⊢
first | exact lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le d) hd.symm | exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe d
simp_all only [degree_eq_natDegree hf]
· first | exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 h | exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 h
#align power_basis.mem_span_pow PowerBasis.mem_span_pow
theorem dim_ne_zero [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) : pb.dim ≠ 0 := fun h =>
not_nonempty_iff.mpr (h.symm ▸ Fin.isEmpty : IsEmpty (Fin pb.dim)) pb.basis.index_nonempty
#align power_basis.dim_ne_zero PowerBasis.dim_ne_zero
theorem dim_pos [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) : 0 < pb.dim :=
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero pb.dim_ne_zero
#align power_basis.dim_pos PowerBasis.dim_pos
theorem exists_eq_aeval [Nontrivial S] (pb : PowerBasis R S) (y : S) :
∃ f : R[X], f.natDegree < pb.dim ∧ y = aeval pb.gen f :=
(mem_span_pow pb.dim_ne_zero).mp (by simpa using pb.basis.mem_span y)
#align power_basis.exists_eq_aeval PowerBasis.exists_eq_aeval
theorem exists_eq_aeval' (pb : PowerBasis R S) (y : S) : ∃ f : R[X], y = aeval pb.gen f := by
nontriviality S
obtain ⟨f, _, hf⟩ := exists_eq_aeval pb y
exact ⟨f, hf⟩
#align power_basis.exists_eq_aeval' PowerBasis.exists_eq_aeval'
theorem algHom_ext {S' : Type*} [Semiring S'] [Algebra R S'] (pb : PowerBasis R S)
⦃f g : S →ₐ[R] S'⦄ (h : f pb.gen = g pb.gen) : f = g := by
ext x
obtain ⟨f, rfl⟩ := pb.exists_eq_aeval' x
rw [← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply, ← Polynomial.aeval_algHom_apply, h]
#align power_basis.alg_hom_ext PowerBasis.algHom_ext
section minpoly
variable [Algebra A S]
/-- `pb.minpolyGen` is the minimal polynomial for `pb.gen`. -/
noncomputable def minpolyGen (pb : PowerBasis A S) : A[X] :=
X ^ pb.dim - ∑ i : Fin pb.dim, C (pb.basis.repr (pb.gen ^ pb.dim) i) * X ^ (i : ℕ)
#align power_basis.minpoly_gen PowerBasis.minpolyGen
theorem aeval_minpolyGen (pb : PowerBasis A S) : aeval pb.gen (minpolyGen pb) = 0 := by
simp_rw [minpolyGen, AlgHom.map_sub, AlgHom.map_sum, AlgHom.map_mul, AlgHom.map_pow, aeval_C, ←
Algebra.smul_def, aeval_X]
refine sub_eq_zero.mpr ((pb.basis.total_repr (pb.gen ^ pb.dim)).symm.trans ?_)
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum_fintype] <;>
simp only [pb.coe_basis, zero_smul, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff]
#align power_basis.aeval_minpoly_gen PowerBasis.aeval_minpolyGen
theorem minpolyGen_monic (pb : PowerBasis A S) : Monic (minpolyGen pb) := by
nontriviality A
apply (monic_X_pow _).sub_of_left _
rw [degree_X_pow]
exact degree_sum_fin_lt _
#align power_basis.minpoly_gen_monic PowerBasis.minpolyGen_monic
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerBasis.lean | 169 | 176 | theorem dim_le_natDegree_of_root (pb : PowerBasis A S) {p : A[X]} (ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(root : aeval pb.gen p = 0) : pb.dim ≤ p.natDegree := by |
refine le_of_not_lt fun hlt => ne_zero ?_
rw [p.as_sum_range' _ hlt, Finset.sum_range]
refine Fintype.sum_eq_zero _ fun i => ?_
simp_rw [aeval_eq_sum_range' hlt, Finset.sum_range, ← pb.basis_eq_pow] at root
have := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.1 pb.basis.linearIndependent _ root
rw [this, monomial_zero_right]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.GDelta
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Arithmetic
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.borel_space.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Borel (measurable) space
## Main definitions
* `borel α` : the least `σ`-algebra that contains all open sets;
* `class BorelSpace` : a space with `TopologicalSpace` and `MeasurableSpace` structures
such that `‹MeasurableSpace α› = borel α`;
* `class OpensMeasurableSpace` : a space with `TopologicalSpace` and `MeasurableSpace`
structures such that all open sets are measurable; equivalently, `borel α ≤ ‹MeasurableSpace α›`.
* `BorelSpace` instances on `Empty`, `Unit`, `Bool`, `Nat`, `Int`, `Rat`;
* `MeasurableSpace` and `BorelSpace` instances on `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0`, `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Main statements
* `IsOpen.measurableSet`, `IsClosed.measurableSet`: open and closed sets are measurable;
* `Continuous.measurable` : a continuous function is measurable;
* `Continuous.measurable2` : if `f : α → β` and `g : α → γ` are measurable and `op : β × γ → δ`
is continuous, then `fun x => op (f x, g y)` is measurable;
* `Measurable.add` etc : dot notation for arithmetic operations on `Measurable` predicates,
and similarly for `dist` and `edist`;
* `AEMeasurable.add` : similar dot notation for almost everywhere measurable functions;
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter MeasureTheory
open scoped Classical Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
universe u v w x y
variable {α β γ γ₂ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort y} {s t u : Set α}
open MeasurableSpace TopologicalSpace
/-- `MeasurableSpace` structure generated by `TopologicalSpace`. -/
def borel (α : Type u) [TopologicalSpace α] : MeasurableSpace α :=
generateFrom { s : Set α | IsOpen s }
#align borel borel
theorem borel_anti : Antitone (@borel α) := fun _ _ h =>
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le fun _ hs => .basic _ (h _ hs)
#align borel_anti borel_anti
theorem borel_eq_top_of_discrete [TopologicalSpace α] [DiscreteTopology α] : borel α = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 fun s _ => GenerateMeasurable.basic s (isOpen_discrete s)
#align borel_eq_top_of_discrete borel_eq_top_of_discrete
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/BorelSpace/Basic.lean | 63 | 69 | theorem borel_eq_top_of_countable [TopologicalSpace α] [T1Space α] [Countable α] : borel α = ⊤ := by |
refine top_le_iff.1 fun s _ => biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ ?_
apply MeasurableSet.biUnion s.to_countable
intro x _
apply MeasurableSet.of_compl
apply GenerateMeasurable.basic
exact isClosed_singleton.isOpen_compl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Alexander Bentkamp
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Cofinality
#align_import linear_algebra.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"13bce9a6b6c44f6b4c91ac1c1d2a816e2533d395"
/-!
# Bases
This file defines bases in a module or vector space.
It is inspired by Isabelle/HOL's linear algebra, and hence indirectly by HOL Light.
## Main definitions
All definitions are given for families of vectors, i.e. `v : ι → M` where `M` is the module or
vector space and `ι : Type*` is an arbitrary indexing type.
* `Basis ι R M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases for a module `M`,
represented by a linear equiv `M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R`.
* the basis vectors of a basis `b : Basis ι R M` are available as `b i`, where `i : ι`
* `Basis.repr` is the isomorphism sending `x : M` to its coordinates `Basis.repr x : ι →₀ R`.
The converse, turning this isomorphism into a basis, is called `Basis.ofRepr`.
* If `ι` is finite, there is a variant of `repr` called `Basis.equivFun b : M ≃ₗ[R] ι → R`
(saving you from having to work with `Finsupp`). The converse, turning this isomorphism into
a basis, is called `Basis.ofEquivFun`.
* `Basis.constr b R f` constructs a linear map `M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂` given the values `f : ι → M₂` at the
basis elements `⇑b : ι → M₁`.
* `Basis.reindex` uses an equiv to map a basis to a different indexing set.
* `Basis.map` uses a linear equiv to map a basis to a different module.
## Main statements
* `Basis.mk`: a linear independent set of vectors spanning the whole module determines a basis
* `Basis.ext` states that two linear maps are equal if they coincide on a basis.
Similar results are available for linear equivs (if they coincide on the basis vectors),
elements (if their coordinates coincide) and the functions `b.repr` and `⇑b`.
## Implementation notes
We use families instead of sets because it allows us to say that two identical vectors are linearly
dependent. For bases, this is useful as well because we can easily derive ordered bases by using an
ordered index type `ι`.
## Tags
basis, bases
-/
noncomputable section
universe u
open Function Set Submodule
variable {ι : Type*} {ι' : Type*} {R : Type*} {R₂ : Type*} {K : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {M' M'' : Type*} {V : Type u} {V' : Type*}
section Module
variable [Semiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
section
variable (ι R M)
/-- A `Basis ι R M` for a module `M` is the type of `ι`-indexed `R`-bases of `M`.
The basis vectors are available as `DFunLike.coe (b : Basis ι R M) : ι → M`.
To turn a linear independent family of vectors spanning `M` into a basis, use `Basis.mk`.
They are internally represented as linear equivs `M ≃ₗ[R] (ι →₀ R)`,
available as `Basis.repr`.
-/
structure Basis where
/-- `Basis.ofRepr` constructs a basis given an assignment of coordinates to each vector. -/
ofRepr ::
/-- `repr` is the linear equivalence sending a vector `x` to its coordinates:
the `c`s such that `x = ∑ i, c i`. -/
repr : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R
#align basis Basis
#align basis.repr Basis.repr
#align basis.of_repr Basis.ofRepr
end
instance uniqueBasis [Subsingleton R] : Unique (Basis ι R M) :=
⟨⟨⟨default⟩⟩, fun ⟨b⟩ => by rw [Subsingleton.elim b]⟩
#align unique_basis uniqueBasis
namespace Basis
instance : Inhabited (Basis ι R (ι →₀ R)) :=
⟨.ofRepr (LinearEquiv.refl _ _)⟩
variable (b b₁ : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) (c : R) (x : M)
section repr
theorem repr_injective : Injective (repr : Basis ι R M → M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) := fun f g h => by
cases f; cases g; congr
#align basis.repr_injective Basis.repr_injective
/-- `b i` is the `i`th basis vector. -/
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Basis ι R M) ι M where
coe b i := b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1)
coe_injective' f g h := repr_injective <| LinearEquiv.symm_bijective.injective <|
LinearEquiv.toLinearMap_injective <| by ext; exact congr_fun h _
#align basis.fun_like Basis.instFunLike
@[simp]
theorem coe_ofRepr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) : ⇑(ofRepr e) = fun i => e.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) :=
rfl
#align basis.coe_of_repr Basis.coe_ofRepr
protected theorem injective [Nontrivial R] : Injective b :=
b.repr.symm.injective.comp fun _ _ => (Finsupp.single_left_inj (one_ne_zero : (1 : R) ≠ 0)).mp
#align basis.injective Basis.injective
theorem repr_symm_single_one : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i 1) = b i :=
rfl
#align basis.repr_symm_single_one Basis.repr_symm_single_one
theorem repr_symm_single : b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = c • b i :=
calc
b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i c) = b.repr.symm (c • Finsupp.single i (1 : R)) := by
{ rw [Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one] }
_ = c • b i := by rw [LinearEquiv.map_smul, repr_symm_single_one]
#align basis.repr_symm_single Basis.repr_symm_single
@[simp]
theorem repr_self : b.repr (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply _ _
#align basis.repr_self Basis.repr_self
theorem repr_self_apply (j) [Decidable (i = j)] : b.repr (b i) j = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
rw [repr_self, Finsupp.single_apply]
#align basis.repr_self_apply Basis.repr_self_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_symm_apply (v) : b.repr.symm v = Finsupp.total ι M R b v :=
calc
b.repr.symm v = b.repr.symm (v.sum Finsupp.single) := by simp
_ = v.sum fun i vi => b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single i vi) := map_finsupp_sum ..
_ = Finsupp.total ι M R b v := by simp only [repr_symm_single, Finsupp.total_apply]
#align basis.repr_symm_apply Basis.repr_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_repr_symm : ↑b.repr.symm = Finsupp.total ι M R b :=
LinearMap.ext fun v => b.repr_symm_apply v
#align basis.coe_repr_symm Basis.coe_repr_symm
@[simp]
theorem repr_total (v) : b.repr (Finsupp.total _ _ _ b v) = v := by
rw [← b.coe_repr_symm]
exact b.repr.apply_symm_apply v
#align basis.repr_total Basis.repr_total
@[simp]
theorem total_repr : Finsupp.total _ _ _ b (b.repr x) = x := by
rw [← b.coe_repr_symm]
exact b.repr.symm_apply_apply x
#align basis.total_repr Basis.total_repr
theorem repr_range : LinearMap.range (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R) = Finsupp.supported R R univ := by
rw [LinearEquiv.range, Finsupp.supported_univ]
#align basis.repr_range Basis.repr_range
theorem mem_span_repr_support (m : M) : m ∈ span R (b '' (b.repr m).support) :=
(Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).2 ⟨b.repr m, by simp [Finsupp.mem_supported_support]⟩
#align basis.mem_span_repr_support Basis.mem_span_repr_support
theorem repr_support_subset_of_mem_span (s : Set ι) {m : M}
(hm : m ∈ span R (b '' s)) : ↑(b.repr m).support ⊆ s := by
rcases (Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total _).1 hm with ⟨l, hl, rfl⟩
rwa [repr_total, ← Finsupp.mem_supported R l]
#align basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span Basis.repr_support_subset_of_mem_span
theorem mem_span_image {m : M} {s : Set ι} : m ∈ span R (b '' s) ↔ ↑(b.repr m).support ⊆ s :=
⟨repr_support_subset_of_mem_span _ _, fun h ↦
span_mono (image_subset _ h) (mem_span_repr_support b _)⟩
@[simp]
theorem self_mem_span_image [Nontrivial R] {i : ι} {s : Set ι} :
b i ∈ span R (b '' s) ↔ i ∈ s := by
simp [mem_span_image, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
end repr
section Coord
/-- `b.coord i` is the linear function giving the `i`'th coordinate of a vector
with respect to the basis `b`.
`b.coord i` is an element of the dual space. In particular, for
finite-dimensional spaces it is the `ι`th basis vector of the dual space.
-/
@[simps!]
def coord : M →ₗ[R] R :=
Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr
#align basis.coord Basis.coord
theorem forall_coord_eq_zero_iff {x : M} : (∀ i, b.coord i x = 0) ↔ x = 0 :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [b.coord_apply, DFunLike.ext_iff, Finsupp.zero_apply])
b.repr.map_eq_zero_iff
#align basis.forall_coord_eq_zero_iff Basis.forall_coord_eq_zero_iff
/-- The sum of the coordinates of an element `m : M` with respect to a basis. -/
noncomputable def sumCoords : M →ₗ[R] R :=
(Finsupp.lsum ℕ fun _ => LinearMap.id) ∘ₗ (b.repr : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R)
#align basis.sum_coords Basis.sumCoords
@[simp]
theorem coe_sumCoords : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = fun m => (b.repr m).sum fun _ => id :=
rfl
#align basis.coe_sum_coords Basis.coe_sumCoords
theorem coe_sumCoords_eq_finsum : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = fun m => ∑ᶠ i, b.coord i m := by
ext m
simp only [Basis.sumCoords, Basis.coord, Finsupp.lapply_apply, LinearMap.id_coe,
LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp,
finsum_eq_sum _ (b.repr m).finite_support, Finsupp.sum, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset, id,
Finsupp.fun_support_eq]
#align basis.coe_sum_coords_eq_finsum Basis.coe_sumCoords_eq_finsum
@[simp high]
theorem coe_sumCoords_of_fintype [Fintype ι] : (b.sumCoords : M → R) = ∑ i, b.coord i := by
ext m
-- Porting note: - `eq_self_iff_true`
-- + `comp_apply` `LinearMap.coeFn_sum`
simp only [sumCoords, Finsupp.sum_fintype, LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, coord_apply,
id, Fintype.sum_apply, imp_true_iff, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp, comp_apply,
LinearMap.coeFn_sum]
#align basis.coe_sum_coords_of_fintype Basis.coe_sumCoords_of_fintype
@[simp]
theorem sumCoords_self_apply : b.sumCoords (b i) = 1 := by
simp only [Basis.sumCoords, LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, id, Basis.repr_self,
Function.comp_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_comp, Finsupp.sum_single_index]
#align basis.sum_coords_self_apply Basis.sumCoords_self_apply
theorem dvd_coord_smul (i : ι) (m : M) (r : R) : r ∣ b.coord i (r • m) :=
⟨b.coord i m, by simp⟩
#align basis.dvd_coord_smul Basis.dvd_coord_smul
theorem coord_repr_symm (b : Basis ι R M) (i : ι) (f : ι →₀ R) :
b.coord i (b.repr.symm f) = f i := by
simp only [repr_symm_apply, coord_apply, repr_total]
#align basis.coord_repr_symm Basis.coord_repr_symm
end Coord
section Ext
variable {R₁ : Type*} [Semiring R₁] {σ : R →+* R₁} {σ' : R₁ →+* R}
variable [RingHomInvPair σ σ'] [RingHomInvPair σ' σ]
variable {M₁ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁]
/-- Two linear maps are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext {f₁ f₂ : M →ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ := by
ext x
rw [← b.total_repr x, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum]
simp only [map_sum, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, h]
#align basis.ext Basis.ext
/-- Two linear equivs are equal if they are equal on basis vectors. -/
theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : M ≃ₛₗ[σ] M₁} (h : ∀ i, f₁ (b i) = f₂ (b i)) : f₁ = f₂ := by
ext x
rw [← b.total_repr x, Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.sum]
simp only [map_sum, LinearEquiv.map_smulₛₗ, h]
#align basis.ext' Basis.ext'
/-- Two elements are equal iff their coordinates are equal. -/
theorem ext_elem_iff {x y : M} : x = y ↔ ∀ i, b.repr x i = b.repr y i := by
simp only [← DFunLike.ext_iff, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq]
#align basis.ext_elem_iff Basis.ext_elem_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Basis.ext_elem⟩ := ext_elem_iff
#align basis.ext_elem Basis.ext_elem
theorem repr_eq_iff {b : Basis ι R M} {f : M →ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
↑b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h i => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.ext fun i => (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm⟩
#align basis.repr_eq_iff Basis.repr_eq_iff
theorem repr_eq_iff' {b : Basis ι R M} {f : M ≃ₗ[R] ι →₀ R} :
b.repr = f ↔ ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h i => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.ext' fun i => (b.repr_self i).trans (h i).symm⟩
#align basis.repr_eq_iff' Basis.repr_eq_iff'
theorem apply_eq_iff {b : Basis ι R M} {x : M} {i : ι} : b i = x ↔ b.repr x = Finsupp.single i 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ b.repr_self i, fun h => b.repr.injective ((b.repr_self i).trans h.symm)⟩
#align basis.apply_eq_iff Basis.apply_eq_iff
/-- An unbundled version of `repr_eq_iff` -/
theorem repr_apply_eq (f : M → ι → R) (hadd : ∀ x y, f (x + y) = f x + f y)
(hsmul : ∀ (c : R) (x : M), f (c • x) = c • f x) (f_eq : ∀ i, f (b i) = Finsupp.single i 1)
(x : M) (i : ι) : b.repr x i = f x i := by
let f_i : M →ₗ[R] R :=
{ toFun := fun x => f x i
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
map_add' := fun _ _ => by beta_reduce; rw [hadd, Pi.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun _ _ => by simp [hsmul, Pi.smul_apply] }
have : Finsupp.lapply i ∘ₗ ↑b.repr = f_i := by
refine b.ext fun j => ?_
show b.repr (b j) i = f (b j) i
rw [b.repr_self, f_eq]
calc
b.repr x i = f_i x := by
{ rw [← this]
rfl }
_ = f x i := rfl
#align basis.repr_apply_eq Basis.repr_apply_eq
/-- Two bases are equal if they assign the same coordinates. -/
theorem eq_ofRepr_eq_repr {b₁ b₂ : Basis ι R M} (h : ∀ x i, b₁.repr x i = b₂.repr x i) : b₁ = b₂ :=
repr_injective <| by ext; apply h
#align basis.eq_of_repr_eq_repr Basis.eq_ofRepr_eq_repr
/-- Two bases are equal if their basis vectors are the same. -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_apply_eq {b₁ b₂ : Basis ι R M} : (∀ i, b₁ i = b₂ i) → b₁ = b₂ :=
DFunLike.ext _ _
#align basis.eq_of_apply_eq Basis.eq_of_apply_eq
end Ext
section Map
variable (f : M ≃ₗ[R] M')
/-- Apply the linear equivalence `f` to the basis vectors. -/
@[simps]
protected def map : Basis ι R M' :=
ofRepr (f.symm.trans b.repr)
#align basis.map Basis.map
@[simp]
theorem map_apply (i) : b.map f i = f (b i) :=
rfl
#align basis.map_apply Basis.map_apply
theorem coe_map : (b.map f : ι → M') = f ∘ b :=
rfl
end Map
section MapCoeffs
variable {R' : Type*} [Semiring R'] [Module R' M] (f : R ≃+* R')
(h : ∀ (c) (x : M), f c • x = c • x)
attribute [local instance] SMul.comp.isScalarTower
/-- If `R` and `R'` are isomorphic rings that act identically on a module `M`,
then a basis for `M` as `R`-module is also a basis for `M` as `R'`-module.
See also `Basis.algebraMapCoeffs` for the case where `f` is equal to `algebraMap`.
-/
@[simps (config := { simpRhs := true })]
def mapCoeffs : Basis ι R' M := by
letI : Module R' R := Module.compHom R (↑f.symm : R' →+* R)
haveI : IsScalarTower R' R M :=
{ smul_assoc := fun x y z => by
-- Porting note: `dsimp [(· • ·)]` is unavailable because
-- `HSMul.hsmul` becomes `SMul.smul`.
change (f.symm x * y) • z = x • (y • z)
rw [mul_smul, ← h, f.apply_symm_apply] }
exact ofRepr <| (b.repr.restrictScalars R').trans <|
Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv (Module.compHom.toLinearEquiv f.symm).symm
#align basis.map_coeffs Basis.mapCoeffs
theorem mapCoeffs_apply (i : ι) : b.mapCoeffs f h i = b i :=
apply_eq_iff.mpr <| by
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, these were automatically inferred from the definition of
-- `mapCoeffs`.
letI : Module R' R := Module.compHom R (↑f.symm : R' →+* R)
haveI : IsScalarTower R' R M :=
{ smul_assoc := fun x y z => by
-- Porting note: `dsimp [(· • ·)]` is unavailable because
-- `HSMul.hsmul` becomes `SMul.smul`.
change (f.symm x * y) • z = x • (y • z)
rw [mul_smul, ← h, f.apply_symm_apply] }
simp
#align basis.map_coeffs_apply Basis.mapCoeffs_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_mapCoeffs : (b.mapCoeffs f h : ι → M) = b :=
funext <| b.mapCoeffs_apply f h
#align basis.coe_map_coeffs Basis.coe_mapCoeffs
end MapCoeffs
section Reindex
variable (b' : Basis ι' R M')
variable (e : ι ≃ ι')
/-- `b.reindex (e : ι ≃ ι')` is a basis indexed by `ι'` -/
def reindex : Basis ι' R M :=
.ofRepr (b.repr.trans (Finsupp.domLCongr e))
#align basis.reindex Basis.reindex
theorem reindex_apply (i' : ι') : b.reindex e i' = b (e.symm i') :=
show (b.repr.trans (Finsupp.domLCongr e)).symm (Finsupp.single i' 1) =
b.repr.symm (Finsupp.single (e.symm i') 1)
by rw [LinearEquiv.symm_trans_apply, Finsupp.domLCongr_symm, Finsupp.domLCongr_single]
#align basis.reindex_apply Basis.reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_reindex : (b.reindex e : ι' → M) = b ∘ e.symm :=
funext (b.reindex_apply e)
#align basis.coe_reindex Basis.coe_reindex
theorem repr_reindex_apply (i' : ι') : (b.reindex e).repr x i' = b.repr x (e.symm i') :=
show (Finsupp.domLCongr e : _ ≃ₗ[R] _) (b.repr x) i' = _ by simp
#align basis.repr_reindex_apply Basis.repr_reindex_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_reindex : (b.reindex e).repr x = (b.repr x).mapDomain e :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ <| by simp [repr_reindex_apply]
#align basis.repr_reindex Basis.repr_reindex
@[simp]
theorem reindex_refl : b.reindex (Equiv.refl ι) = b :=
eq_of_apply_eq fun i => by simp
#align basis.reindex_refl Basis.reindex_refl
/-- `simp` can prove this as `Basis.coe_reindex` + `EquivLike.range_comp` -/
theorem range_reindex : Set.range (b.reindex e) = Set.range b := by
simp [coe_reindex, range_comp]
#align basis.range_reindex Basis.range_reindex
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Basis.lean | 448 | 451 | theorem sumCoords_reindex : (b.reindex e).sumCoords = b.sumCoords := by |
ext x
simp only [coe_sumCoords, repr_reindex]
exact Finsupp.sum_mapDomain_index (fun _ => rfl) fun _ _ _ => rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Fin
import Mathlib.Order.PiLex
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.fin.tuple.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ef997baa41b5c428be3fb50089a7139bf4ee886b"
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
We define the following operations:
* `Fin.tail` : the tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries;
* `Fin.cons` : adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple;
* `Fin.init` : the beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries;
* `Fin.snoc` : adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc`
comes from `cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order.
* `Fin.insertNth` : insert an element to a tuple at a given position.
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
#align fin.tuple0_le Fin.tuple0_le
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
#align fin.tail Fin.tail
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
#align fin.tail_def Fin.tail_def
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
#align fin.cons Fin.cons
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp (config := { unfoldPartialApp := true }) [tail, cons]
#align fin.tail_cons Fin.tail_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_succ Fin.cons_succ
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
#align fin.cons_zero Fin.cons_zero
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Type*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 92 | 104 | theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by |
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_noteq h', update_noteq this, cons_succ]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.block from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6ca1a09bc9aa75824bf97388c9e3b441fc4ccf3f"
/-!
# Block matrices and their determinant
This file defines a predicate `Matrix.BlockTriangular` saying a matrix
is block triangular, and proves the value of the determinant for various
matrices built out of blocks.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.BlockTriangular` expresses that an `o` by `o` matrix is block triangular,
if the rows and columns are ordered according to some order `b : o → α`
## Main results
* `Matrix.det_of_blockTriangular`: the determinant of a block triangular matrix
is equal to the product of the determinants of all the blocks
* `Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular` and `Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular`: the determinant of
a triangular matrix is the product of the entries along the diagonal
## Tags
matrix, diagonal, det, block triangular
-/
open Finset Function OrderDual
open Matrix
universe v
variable {α β m n o : Type*} {m' n' : α → Type*}
variable {R : Type v} [CommRing R] {M N : Matrix m m R} {b : m → α}
namespace Matrix
section LT
variable [LT α]
/-- Let `b` map rows and columns of a square matrix `M` to blocks indexed by `α`s. Then
`BlockTriangular M n b` says the matrix is block triangular. -/
def BlockTriangular (M : Matrix m m R) (b : m → α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃i j⦄, b j < b i → M i j = 0
#align matrix.block_triangular Matrix.BlockTriangular
@[simp]
protected theorem BlockTriangular.submatrix {f : n → m} (h : M.BlockTriangular b) :
(M.submatrix f f).BlockTriangular (b ∘ f) := fun _ _ hij => h hij
#align matrix.block_triangular.submatrix Matrix.BlockTriangular.submatrix
theorem blockTriangular_reindex_iff {b : n → α} {e : m ≃ n} :
(reindex e e M).BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (b ∘ e) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [reindex_apply, submatrix_submatrix, submatrix_id_id, Equiv.symm_comp_self]
· convert h.submatrix
simp only [comp.assoc b e e.symm, Equiv.self_comp_symm, comp_id]
#align matrix.block_triangular_reindex_iff Matrix.blockTriangular_reindex_iff
protected theorem BlockTriangular.transpose :
M.BlockTriangular b → Mᵀ.BlockTriangular (toDual ∘ b) :=
swap
#align matrix.block_triangular.transpose Matrix.BlockTriangular.transpose
@[simp]
protected theorem blockTriangular_transpose_iff {b : m → αᵒᵈ} :
Mᵀ.BlockTriangular b ↔ M.BlockTriangular (ofDual ∘ b) :=
forall_swap
#align matrix.block_triangular_transpose_iff Matrix.blockTriangular_transpose_iff
@[simp]
theorem blockTriangular_zero : BlockTriangular (0 : Matrix m m R) b := fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align matrix.block_triangular_zero Matrix.blockTriangular_zero
protected theorem BlockTriangular.neg (hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular (-M) b :=
fun _ _ h => neg_eq_zero.2 <| hM h
#align matrix.block_triangular.neg Matrix.BlockTriangular.neg
theorem BlockTriangular.add (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M + N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.add_apply, hM h, hN h, zero_add]
#align matrix.block_triangular.add Matrix.BlockTriangular.add
theorem BlockTriangular.sub (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (hN : BlockTriangular N b) :
BlockTriangular (M - N) b := fun i j h => by simp_rw [Matrix.sub_apply, hM h, hN h, sub_zero]
#align matrix.block_triangular.sub Matrix.BlockTriangular.sub
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
theorem blockTriangular_diagonal [DecidableEq m] (d : m → R) : BlockTriangular (diagonal d) b :=
fun _ _ h => diagonal_apply_ne' d fun h' => ne_of_lt h (congr_arg _ h')
#align matrix.block_triangular_diagonal Matrix.blockTriangular_diagonal
theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal' [DecidableEq α] (d : ∀ i : α, Matrix (m' i) (m' i) R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal' d) Sigma.fst := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
apply blockDiagonal'_apply_ne d i' j' fun h' => ne_of_lt h h'.symm
#align matrix.block_triangular_block_diagonal' Matrix.blockTriangular_blockDiagonal'
theorem blockTriangular_blockDiagonal [DecidableEq α] (d : α → Matrix m m R) :
BlockTriangular (blockDiagonal d) Prod.snd := by
rintro ⟨i, i'⟩ ⟨j, j'⟩ h
rw [blockDiagonal'_eq_blockDiagonal, blockTriangular_blockDiagonal']
exact h
#align matrix.block_triangular_block_diagonal Matrix.blockTriangular_blockDiagonal
variable [DecidableEq m]
theorem blockTriangular_one : BlockTriangular (1 : Matrix m m R) b :=
blockTriangular_diagonal _
theorem blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix {i j : m} (hij : b i ≤ b j) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (stdBasisMatrix i j c) b := by
intro r s hrs
apply StdBasisMatrix.apply_of_ne
rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact (hij.trans_lt hrs).false
theorem blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix' {i j : m} (hij : b j ≤ b i) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (stdBasisMatrix i j c) (toDual ∘ b) :=
blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix (by exact toDual_le_toDual.mpr hij) _
theorem blockTriangular_transvection {i j : m} (hij : b i ≤ b j) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (transvection i j c) b :=
blockTriangular_one.add (blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix hij c)
theorem blockTriangular_transvection' {i j : m} (hij : b j ≤ b i) (c : R) :
BlockTriangular (transvection i j c) (OrderDual.toDual ∘ b) :=
blockTriangular_one.add (blockTriangular_stdBasisMatrix' hij c)
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem BlockTriangular.mul [Fintype m] {M N : Matrix m m R} (hM : BlockTriangular M b)
(hN : BlockTriangular N b) : BlockTriangular (M * N) b := by
intro i j hij
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro k _
by_cases hki : b k < b i
· simp_rw [hM hki, zero_mul]
· simp_rw [hN (lt_of_lt_of_le hij (le_of_not_lt hki)), mul_zero]
#align matrix.block_triangular.mul Matrix.BlockTriangular.mul
end LinearOrder
theorem upper_two_blockTriangular [Preorder α] (A : Matrix m m R) (B : Matrix m n R)
(D : Matrix n n R) {a b : α} (hab : a < b) :
BlockTriangular (fromBlocks A B 0 D) (Sum.elim (fun _ => a) fun _ => b) := by
rintro (c | c) (d | d) hcd <;> first | simp [hab.not_lt] at hcd ⊢
#align matrix.upper_two_block_triangular Matrix.upper_two_blockTriangular
/-! ### Determinant -/
variable [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
theorem equiv_block_det (M : Matrix m m R) {p q : m → Prop} [DecidablePred p] [DecidablePred q]
(e : ∀ x, q x ↔ p x) : (toSquareBlockProp M p).det = (toSquareBlockProp M q).det := by
convert Matrix.det_reindex_self (Equiv.subtypeEquivRight e) (toSquareBlockProp M q)
#align matrix.equiv_block_det Matrix.equiv_block_det
-- Removed `@[simp]` attribute,
-- as the LHS simplifies already to `M.toSquareBlock id i ⟨i, ⋯⟩ ⟨i, ⋯⟩`
theorem det_toSquareBlock_id (M : Matrix m m R) (i : m) : (M.toSquareBlock id i).det = M i i :=
letI : Unique { a // id a = i } := ⟨⟨⟨i, rfl⟩⟩, fun j => Subtype.ext j.property⟩
(det_unique _).trans rfl
#align matrix.det_to_square_block_id Matrix.det_toSquareBlock_id
theorem det_toBlock (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
M.det =
(fromBlocks (toBlock M p p) (toBlock M p fun j => ¬p j) (toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) p) <|
toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) fun j => ¬p j).det := by
rw [← Matrix.det_reindex_self (Equiv.sumCompl p).symm M]
rw [det_apply', det_apply']
congr; ext σ; congr; ext x
generalize hy : σ x = y
cases x <;> cases y <;>
simp only [Matrix.reindex_apply, toBlock_apply, Equiv.symm_symm, Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inr,
Equiv.sumCompl_apply_inl, fromBlocks_apply₁₁, fromBlocks_apply₁₂, fromBlocks_apply₂₁,
fromBlocks_apply₂₂, Matrix.submatrix_apply]
#align matrix.det_to_block Matrix.det_toBlock
theorem twoBlockTriangular_det (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : ∀ i, ¬p i → ∀ j, p j → M i j = 0) :
M.det = (toSquareBlockProp M p).det * (toSquareBlockProp M fun i => ¬p i).det := by
rw [det_toBlock M p]
convert det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁ (toBlock M p p) (toBlock M p fun j => ¬p j)
(toBlock M (fun j => ¬p j) fun j => ¬p j)
ext i j
exact h (↑i) i.2 (↑j) j.2
#align matrix.two_block_triangular_det Matrix.twoBlockTriangular_det
theorem twoBlockTriangular_det' (M : Matrix m m R) (p : m → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, ¬p j → M i j = 0) :
M.det = (toSquareBlockProp M p).det * (toSquareBlockProp M fun i => ¬p i).det := by
rw [M.twoBlockTriangular_det fun i => ¬p i, mul_comm]
· congr 1
exact equiv_block_det _ fun _ => not_not.symm
· simpa only [Classical.not_not] using h
#align matrix.two_block_triangular_det' Matrix.twoBlockTriangular_det'
protected theorem BlockTriangular.det [DecidableEq α] [LinearOrder α] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) :
M.det = ∏ a ∈ univ.image b, (M.toSquareBlock b a).det := by
clear N
induction' hs : univ.image b using Finset.strongInduction with s ih generalizing m
subst hs
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty m
· simp
let k := (univ.image b).max' (univ_nonempty.image _)
rw [twoBlockTriangular_det' M fun i => b i = k]
· have : univ.image b = insert k ((univ.image b).erase k) := by
rw [insert_erase]
apply max'_mem
rw [this, prod_insert (not_mem_erase _ _)]
refine congr_arg _ ?_
let b' := fun i : { a // b a ≠ k } => b ↑i
have h' : BlockTriangular (M.toSquareBlockProp fun i => b i ≠ k) b' := hM.submatrix
have hb' : image b' univ = (image b univ).erase k := by
convert image_subtype_ne_univ_eq_image_erase k b
rw [ih _ (erase_ssubset <| max'_mem _ _) h' hb']
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun l hl => ?_
let he : { a // b' a = l } ≃ { a // b a = l } :=
haveI hc : ∀ i, b i = l → b i ≠ k := fun i hi => ne_of_eq_of_ne hi (ne_of_mem_erase hl)
Equiv.subtypeSubtypeEquivSubtype @(hc)
simp only [toSquareBlock_def]
erw [← Matrix.det_reindex_self he.symm fun i j : { a // b a = l } => M ↑i ↑j]
rfl
· intro i hi j hj
apply hM
rw [hi]
apply lt_of_le_of_ne _ hj
exact Finset.le_max' (univ.image b) _ (mem_image_of_mem _ (mem_univ _))
#align matrix.block_triangular.det Matrix.BlockTriangular.det
theorem BlockTriangular.det_fintype [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α]
(h : BlockTriangular M b) : M.det = ∏ k : α, (M.toSquareBlock b k).det := by
refine h.det.trans (prod_subset (subset_univ _) fun a _ ha => ?_)
have : IsEmpty { i // b i = a } := ⟨fun i => ha <| mem_image.2 ⟨i, mem_univ _, i.2⟩⟩
exact det_isEmpty
#align matrix.block_triangular.det_fintype Matrix.BlockTriangular.det_fintype
theorem det_of_upperTriangular [LinearOrder m] (h : M.BlockTriangular id) :
M.det = ∏ i : m, M i i := by
haveI : DecidableEq R := Classical.decEq _
simp_rw [h.det, image_id, det_toSquareBlock_id]
#align matrix.det_of_upper_triangular Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular
theorem det_of_lowerTriangular [LinearOrder m] (M : Matrix m m R) (h : M.BlockTriangular toDual) :
M.det = ∏ i : m, M i i := by
rw [← det_transpose]
exact det_of_upperTriangular h.transpose
#align matrix.det_of_lower_triangular Matrix.det_of_lowerTriangular
open Polynomial
theorem matrixOfPolynomials_blockTriangular {n : ℕ} (p : Fin n → R[X])
(h_deg : ∀ i, (p i).natDegree ≤ i) :
Matrix.BlockTriangular (Matrix.of (fun (i j : Fin n) => (p j).coeff i)) id :=
fun _ j h => by
exact coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt (h_deg j) h
theorem det_matrixOfPolynomials {n : ℕ} (p : Fin n → R[X])
(h_deg : ∀ i, (p i).natDegree = i) (h_monic : ∀ i, Monic <| p i) :
(Matrix.of (fun (i j : Fin n) => (p j).coeff i)).det = 1 := by
rw [Matrix.det_of_upperTriangular (Matrix.matrixOfPolynomials_blockTriangular p (fun i ↦
Nat.le_of_eq (h_deg i)))]
convert prod_const_one with x _
rw [Matrix.of_apply, ← h_deg, coeff_natDegree, (h_monic x).leadingCoeff]
/-! ### Invertible -/
theorem BlockTriangular.toBlock_inverse_mul_toBlock_eq_one [LinearOrder α] [Invertible M]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) (k : α) :
((M⁻¹.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k) *
M.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k) =
1 := by
let p i := b i < k
have h_sum :
M⁻¹.toBlock p p * M.toBlock p p +
(M⁻¹.toBlock p fun i => ¬p i) * M.toBlock (fun i => ¬p i) p =
1 := by
rw [← toBlock_mul_eq_add, inv_mul_of_invertible M, toBlock_one_self]
have h_zero : M.toBlock (fun i => ¬p i) p = 0 := by
ext i j
simpa using hM (lt_of_lt_of_le j.2 (le_of_not_lt i.2))
simpa [h_zero] using h_sum
#align matrix.block_triangular.to_block_inverse_mul_to_block_eq_one Matrix.BlockTriangular.toBlock_inverse_mul_toBlock_eq_one
/-- The inverse of an upper-left subblock of a block-triangular matrix `M` is the upper-left
subblock of `M⁻¹`. -/
theorem BlockTriangular.inv_toBlock [LinearOrder α] [Invertible M] (hM : BlockTriangular M b)
(k : α) :
(M.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k)⁻¹ =
M⁻¹.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k :=
inv_eq_left_inv <| hM.toBlock_inverse_mul_toBlock_eq_one k
#align matrix.block_triangular.inv_to_block Matrix.BlockTriangular.inv_toBlock
/-- An upper-left subblock of an invertible block-triangular matrix is invertible. -/
def BlockTriangular.invertibleToBlock [LinearOrder α] [Invertible M] (hM : BlockTriangular M b)
(k : α) : Invertible (M.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k) :=
invertibleOfLeftInverse _ ((⅟ M).toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun i => b i < k) <| by
simpa only [invOf_eq_nonsing_inv] using hM.toBlock_inverse_mul_toBlock_eq_one k
#align matrix.block_triangular.invertible_to_block Matrix.BlockTriangular.invertibleToBlock
/-- A lower-left subblock of the inverse of a block-triangular matrix is zero. This is a first step
towards `BlockTriangular.inv_toBlock` below. -/
theorem toBlock_inverse_eq_zero [LinearOrder α] [Invertible M] (hM : BlockTriangular M b) (k : α) :
(M⁻¹.toBlock (fun i => k ≤ b i) fun i => b i < k) = 0 := by
let p i := b i < k
let q i := ¬b i < k
have h_sum : M⁻¹.toBlock q p * M.toBlock p p + M⁻¹.toBlock q q * M.toBlock q p = 0 := by
rw [← toBlock_mul_eq_add, inv_mul_of_invertible M, toBlock_one_disjoint]
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
exact fun i h => h.1 h.2
have h_zero : M.toBlock q p = 0 := by
ext i j
simpa using hM (lt_of_lt_of_le j.2 <| le_of_not_lt i.2)
have h_mul_eq_zero : M⁻¹.toBlock q p * M.toBlock p p = 0 := by simpa [h_zero] using h_sum
haveI : Invertible (M.toBlock p p) := hM.invertibleToBlock k
have : (fun i => k ≤ b i) = q := by
ext
exact not_lt.symm
rw [this, ← Matrix.zero_mul (M.toBlock p p)⁻¹, ← h_mul_eq_zero,
mul_inv_cancel_right_of_invertible]
#align matrix.to_block_inverse_eq_zero Matrix.toBlock_inverse_eq_zero
/-- The inverse of a block-triangular matrix is block-triangular. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Block.lean | 347 | 367 | theorem blockTriangular_inv_of_blockTriangular [LinearOrder α] [Invertible M]
(hM : BlockTriangular M b) : BlockTriangular M⁻¹ b := by |
clear N
induction' hs : univ.image b using Finset.strongInduction with s ih generalizing m
subst hs
intro i j hij
haveI : Inhabited m := ⟨i⟩
let k := (univ.image b).max' (univ_nonempty.image _)
let b' := fun i : { a // b a < k } => b ↑i
let A := M.toBlock (fun i => b i < k) fun j => b j < k
obtain hbi | hi : b i = k ∨ _ := (le_max' _ (b i) <| mem_image_of_mem _ <| mem_univ _).eq_or_lt
· have : M⁻¹.toBlock (fun i => k ≤ b i) (fun i => b i < k) ⟨i, hbi.ge⟩ ⟨j, hbi ▸ hij⟩ = 0 := by
simp only [toBlock_inverse_eq_zero hM k, Matrix.zero_apply]
simp [this.symm]
haveI : Invertible A := hM.invertibleToBlock _
have hA : A.BlockTriangular b' := hM.submatrix
have hb' : image b' univ ⊂ image b univ := by
convert image_subtype_univ_ssubset_image_univ k b _ (fun a => a < k) (lt_irrefl _)
convert max'_mem (α := α) _ _
have hij' : b' ⟨j, hij.trans hi⟩ < b' ⟨i, hi⟩ := by simp_rw [hij]
simp [hM.inv_toBlock k, (ih (image b' univ) hb' hA rfl hij').symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.ZPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.integral.circle_integral from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# Integral over a circle in `ℂ`
In this file we define `∮ z in C(c, R), f z` to be the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$ and
prove some properties of this integral. We give definition and prove most lemmas for a function
`f : ℂ → E`, where `E` is a complex Banach space. For this reason,
some lemmas use, e.g., `(z - c)⁻¹ • f z` instead of `f z / (z - c)`.
## Main definitions
* `circleMap c R`: the exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$;
* `CircleIntegrable f c R`: a function `f : ℂ → E` is integrable on the circle with center `c` and
radius `R` if `f ∘ circleMap c R` is integrable on `[0, 2π]`;
* `circleIntegral f c R`: the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$;
* `cauchyPowerSeries f c R`: the power series that is equal to
$\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \oint_{|z-c|=R} \left(\frac{w-c}{z - c}\right)^n \frac{1}{z-c}f(z)\,dz$ at
`w - c`. The coefficients of this power series depend only on `f ∘ circleMap c R`, and the power
series converges to `f w` if `f` is differentiable on the closed ball `Metric.closedBall c R`
and `w` belongs to the corresponding open ball.
## Main statements
* `hasFPowerSeriesOn_cauchy_integral`: for any circle integrable function `f`, the power series
`cauchyPowerSeries f c R`, `R > 0`, converges to the Cauchy integral
`(2 * π * I : ℂ)⁻¹ • ∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w)⁻¹ • f z` on the open disc `Metric.ball c R`;
* `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, and
`circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`: formulas for `∮ z in C(c, R), (z - w) ^ n`,
`n : ℤ`. These lemmas cover the following cases:
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_undef`, `n < 0` and `|w - c| = |R|`: in this case the
function is not integrable, so the integral is equal to its default value (zero);
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_zpow_of_ne`, `n ≠ -1`: in the cases not covered by the previous
lemma, we have `(z - w) ^ n = ((z - w) ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1))'`, thus the integral equals zero;
- `circleIntegral.integral_sub_inv_of_mem_ball`, `n = -1`, `|w - c| < R`: in this case the
integral is equal to `2πi`.
The case `n = -1`, `|w -c| > R` is not covered by these lemmas. While it is possible to construct
an explicit primitive, it is easier to apply Cauchy theorem, so we postpone the proof till we have
this theorem (see #10000).
## Notation
- `∮ z in C(c, R), f z`: notation for the integral $\oint_{|z-c|=|R|} f(z)\,dz$, defined as
$\int_{0}^{2π}(c + Re^{θ i})' f(c+Re^{θ i})\,dθ$.
## Tags
integral, circle, Cauchy integral
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
noncomputable section
open scoped Real NNReal Interval Pointwise Topology
open Complex MeasureTheory TopologicalSpace Metric Function Set Filter Asymptotics
/-!
### `circleMap`, a parametrization of a circle
-/
/-- The exponential map $θ ↦ c + R e^{θi}$. The range of this map is the circle in `ℂ` with center
`c` and radius `|R|`. -/
def circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : ℝ → ℂ := fun θ => c + R * exp (θ * I)
#align circle_map circleMap
/-- `circleMap` is `2π`-periodic. -/
theorem periodic_circleMap (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) : Periodic (circleMap c R) (2 * π) := fun θ => by
simp [circleMap, add_mul, exp_periodic _]
#align periodic_circle_map periodic_circleMap
theorem Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap {s : Set ℂ} (hs : s.Countable) (c : ℂ) {R : ℝ}
(hR : R ≠ 0) : (circleMap c R ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
show (((↑) : ℝ → ℂ) ⁻¹' ((· * I) ⁻¹'
(exp ⁻¹' ((R * ·) ⁻¹' ((c + ·) ⁻¹' s))))).Countable from
(((hs.preimage (add_right_injective _)).preimage <|
mul_right_injective₀ <| ofReal_ne_zero.2 hR).preimage_cexp.preimage <|
mul_left_injective₀ I_ne_zero).preimage ofReal_injective
#align set.countable.preimage_circle_map Set.Countable.preimage_circleMap
@[simp]
theorem circleMap_sub_center (c : ℂ) (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : circleMap c R θ - c = circleMap 0 R θ := by
simp [circleMap]
#align circle_map_sub_center circleMap_sub_center
theorem circleMap_zero (R θ : ℝ) : circleMap 0 R θ = R * exp (θ * I) :=
zero_add _
#align circle_map_zero circleMap_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/CircleIntegral.lean | 114 | 114 | theorem abs_circleMap_zero (R : ℝ) (θ : ℝ) : abs (circleMap 0 R θ) = |R| := by | simp [circleMap]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
#align_import topology.metric_space.hausdorff_distance from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bc91ed7093bf098d253401e69df601fc33dde156"
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
#align emetric.inf_edist EMetric.infEdist
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
#align emetric.inf_edist_empty EMetric.infEdist_empty
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
#align emetric.le_inf_edist EMetric.le_infEdist
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
#align emetric.inf_edist_union EMetric.infEdist_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
#align emetric.inf_edist_Union EMetric.infEdist_iUnion
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
#align emetric.inf_edist_singleton EMetric.infEdist_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
#align emetric.inf_edist_zero_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_zero_of_mem
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
#align emetric.inf_edist_anti EMetric.infEdist_anti
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align emetric.inf_edist_lt_iff EMetric.infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun z _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_edist_add_inf_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
#align emetric.edist_le_inf_edist_add_ediam EMetric.edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
#align emetric.continuous_inf_edist EMetric.continuous_infEdist
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
#align emetric.mem_closure_iff_inf_edist_zero EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by
rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
#align emetric.mem_iff_inf_edist_zero_of_closed EMetric.mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x E ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, pos_iff_ne_zero]
#align emetric.inf_edist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} :
0 < infEdist x (closure E) ↔ x ∉ closure E := by
rw [infEdist_closure, infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure]
#align emetric.inf_edist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure EMetric.infEdist_closure_pos_iff_not_mem_closure
theorem exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∃ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε ∧ ENNReal.ofReal ε < infEdist x E := by
rw [← infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure, ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_real_btwn] at h
rcases h with ⟨ε, ⟨_, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩⟩
exact ⟨ε, ⟨ENNReal.ofReal_pos.mp ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩
#align emetric.exists_real_pos_lt_inf_edist_of_not_mem_closure EMetric.exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : r < infEdist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s := by
rw [disjoint_left]
intro y hy h'y
apply lt_irrefl (infEdist x s)
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x y := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h'y
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall, edist_comm] at hy
_ < infEdist x s := h
#align emetric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_edist EMetric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infEdist
/-- The infimum edistance is invariant under isometries -/
theorem infEdist_image (hΦ : Isometry Φ) : infEdist (Φ x) (Φ '' t) = infEdist x t := by
simp only [infEdist, iInf_image, hΦ.edist_eq]
#align emetric.inf_edist_image EMetric.infEdist_image
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_smul {M} [SMul M α] [IsometricSMul M α] (c : M) (x : α) (s : Set α) :
infEdist (c • x) (c • s) = infEdist x s :=
infEdist_image (isometry_smul _ _)
#align emetric.inf_edist_smul EMetric.infEdist_smul
#align emetric.inf_edist_vadd EMetric.infEdist_vadd
theorem _root_.IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed {U : Set α} (hU : IsOpen U) :
∃ F : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, IsClosed (F n)) ∧ (∀ n, F n ⊆ U) ∧ ⋃ n, F n = U ∧ Monotone F := by
obtain ⟨a, a_pos, a_lt_one⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ≥0∞, 0 < a ∧ a < 1 := exists_between zero_lt_one
let F := fun n : ℕ => (fun x => infEdist x Uᶜ) ⁻¹' Ici (a ^ n)
have F_subset : ∀ n, F n ⊆ U := fun n x hx ↦ by
by_contra h
have : infEdist x Uᶜ ≠ 0 := ((ENNReal.pow_pos a_pos _).trans_le hx).ne'
exact this (infEdist_zero_of_mem h)
refine ⟨F, fun n => IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Ici, F_subset, ?_, ?_⟩
· show ⋃ n, F n = U
refine Subset.antisymm (by simp only [iUnion_subset_iff, F_subset, forall_const]) fun x hx => ?_
have : ¬x ∈ Uᶜ := by simpa using hx
rw [mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed hU.isClosed_compl] at this
have B : 0 < infEdist x Uᶜ := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using this
have : Filter.Tendsto (fun n => a ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one a_lt_one
rcases ((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ B).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
simp only [mem_iUnion, mem_Ici, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨n, hn.le⟩
show Monotone F
intro m n hmn x hx
simp only [F, mem_Ici, mem_preimage] at hx ⊢
apply le_trans (pow_le_pow_right_of_le_one' a_lt_one.le hmn) hx
#align is_open.exists_Union_is_closed IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed
theorem _root_.IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (hne : s.Nonempty) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, infEdist x s = edist x y := by
have A : Continuous fun y => edist x y := continuous_const.edist continuous_id
obtain ⟨y, ys, hy⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne A.continuousOn
exact ⟨y, ys, le_antisymm (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) (by rwa [le_infEdist])⟩
#align is_compact.exists_inf_edist_eq_edist IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist
theorem exists_pos_forall_lt_edist (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (hst : Disjoint s t) :
∃ r : ℝ≥0, 0 < r ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (r : ℝ≥0∞) < edist x y := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hne)
· use 1
simp
obtain ⟨x, hx, h⟩ := hs.exists_isMinOn hne continuous_infEdist.continuousOn
have : 0 < infEdist x t :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.2 fun H => hst.le_bot ⟨hx, (mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed ht).mpr H⟩
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 this with ⟨r, h₀, hr⟩
exact ⟨r, ENNReal.coe_pos.mp h₀, fun y hy z hz => hr.trans_le <| le_infEdist.1 (h hy) z hz⟩
#align emetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist EMetric.exists_pos_forall_lt_edist
end InfEdist
/-! ### The Hausdorff distance as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between two sets is the smallest `r` such that each set
is contained in the `r`-neighborhood of the other one -/
irreducible_def hausdorffEdist {α : Type u} [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (s t : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(⨆ x ∈ s, infEdist x t) ⊔ ⨆ y ∈ t, infEdist y s
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_def EMetric.hausdorffEdist_def
section HausdorffEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t u : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-- The Hausdorff edistance of a set to itself vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self : hausdorffEdist s s = 0 := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_idem, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero]
exact fun x hx => infEdist_zero_of_mem hx
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self
/-- The Haudorff edistances of `s` to `t` and of `t` to `s` coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_comm : hausdorffEdist s t = hausdorffEdist t s := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def]; apply sup_comm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_comm EMetric.hausdorffEdist_comm
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by bounding the edistance of any point
in each set to the other set -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x t ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, infEdist x s ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
exact ⟨H1, H2⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_inf_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist
/-- Bounding the Hausdorff edistance by exhibiting, for any point in each set,
another point in the other set at controlled distance -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist {r : ℝ≥0∞} (H1 : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, edist x y ≤ r)
(H2 : ∀ x ∈ t, ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y ≤ r) : hausdorffEdist s t ≤ r := by
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_infEdist (fun x xs ↦ ?_) (fun x xt ↦ ?_)
· rcases H1 x xs with ⟨y, yt, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem yt) hy
· rcases H2 x xt with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact le_trans (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem ys) hy
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_of_mem_edist EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist
/-- The distance to a set is controlled by the Hausdorff distance. -/
theorem infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
refine le_trans ?_ le_sup_left
exact le_iSup₂ (α := ℝ≥0∞) x h
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_Hausdorff_edist_of_mem EMetric.infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem
/-- If the Hausdorff distance is `< r`, then any point in one of the sets has
a corresponding point at distance `< r` in the other set. -/
theorem exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt {r : ℝ≥0∞} (h : x ∈ s) (H : hausdorffEdist s t < r) :
∃ y ∈ t, edist x y < r :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp <|
calc
infEdist x t ≤ hausdorffEdist s t := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem h
_ < r := H
#align emetric.exists_edist_lt_of_Hausdorff_edist_lt EMetric.exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt
/-- The distance from `x` to `s` or `t` is controlled in terms of the Hausdorff distance
between `s` and `t`. -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist :
infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t :=
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => by
have ε0 : (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x s < infEdist x s + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).1.ne ε0
obtain ⟨y : α, ys : y ∈ s, dxy : edist x y < infEdist x s + ↑ε / 2⟩ := infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
have : hausdorffEdist s t < hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ENNReal.add_lt_top.1 h).2.ne ε0
obtain ⟨z : α, zt : z ∈ t, dyz : edist y z < hausdorffEdist s t + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
exists_edist_lt_of_hausdorffEdist_lt ys this
calc
infEdist x t ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zt
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x s + ε / 2 + (hausdorffEdist s t + ε / 2) := add_le_add dxy.le dyz.le
_ = infEdist x s + hausdorffEdist s t + ε := by
simp [ENNReal.add_halves, add_comm, add_left_comm]
#align emetric.inf_edist_le_inf_edist_add_Hausdorff_edist EMetric.infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
/-- The Hausdorff edistance is invariant under isometries. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_image (h : Isometry Φ) :
hausdorffEdist (Φ '' s) (Φ '' t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, iSup_image, infEdist_image h]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_image EMetric.hausdorffEdist_image
/-- The Hausdorff distance is controlled by the diameter of the union. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_le_ediam (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
hausdorffEdist s t ≤ diam (s ∪ t) := by
rcases hs with ⟨x, xs⟩
rcases ht with ⟨y, yt⟩
refine hausdorffEdist_le_of_mem_edist ?_ ?_
· intro z hz
exact ⟨y, yt, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_left hz) (subset_union_right yt)⟩
· intro z hz
exact ⟨x, xs, edist_le_diam_of_mem (subset_union_right hz) (subset_union_left xs)⟩
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_le_ediam EMetric.hausdorffEdist_le_ediam
/-- The Hausdorff distance satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_triangle : hausdorffEdist s u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_def]
simp only [sup_le_iff, iSup_le_iff]
constructor
· show ∀ x ∈ s, infEdist x u ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xs =>
calc
infEdist x u ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs) _
· show ∀ x ∈ u, infEdist x s ≤ hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u
exact fun x xu =>
calc
infEdist x s ≤ infEdist x t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
infEdist_le_infEdist_add_hausdorffEdist
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist u t + hausdorffEdist t s :=
add_le_add_right (infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xu) _
_ = hausdorffEdist s t + hausdorffEdist t u := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm, add_comm]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_triangle EMetric.hausdorffEdist_triangle
/-- Two sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they have the same closure. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ closure s = closure t := by
simp only [hausdorffEdist_def, ENNReal.sup_eq_zero, ENNReal.iSup_eq_zero, ← subset_def,
← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, subset_antisymm_iff, isClosed_closure.closure_subset_iff]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between a set and its closure vanishes. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_self_closure : hausdorffEdist s (closure s) = 0 := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, closure_closure]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_self_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_self_closure
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₁ : hausdorffEdist (closure s) t = hausdorffEdist s t := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist (closure s) s + hausdorffEdist s t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist s t := by simp [hausdorffEdist_comm]
· calc
_ ≤ hausdorffEdist s (closure s) + hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := hausdorffEdist_triangle
_ = hausdorffEdist (closure s) t := by simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₁ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₁
/-- Replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance. -/
@[simp]
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure₂ : hausdorffEdist s (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp [@hausdorffEdist_comm _ _ s _]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure₂ EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure₂
/-- The Hausdorff edistance between sets or their closures is the same. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem hausdorffEdist_closure : hausdorffEdist (closure s) (closure t) = hausdorffEdist s t := by
simp
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_closure EMetric.hausdorffEdist_closure
/-- Two closed sets are at zero Hausdorff edistance if and only if they coincide. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed (hs : IsClosed s) (ht : IsClosed t) :
hausdorffEdist s t = 0 ↔ s = t := by
rw [hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure, hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed EMetric.hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_eq_of_closed
/-- The Haudorff edistance to the empty set is infinite. -/
theorem hausdorffEdist_empty (ne : s.Nonempty) : hausdorffEdist s ∅ = ∞ := by
rcases ne with ⟨x, xs⟩
have : infEdist x ∅ ≤ hausdorffEdist s ∅ := infEdist_le_hausdorffEdist_of_mem xs
simpa using this
#align emetric.Hausdorff_edist_empty EMetric.hausdorffEdist_empty
/-- If a set is at finite Hausdorff edistance of a nonempty set, it is nonempty. -/
theorem nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (hs : s.Nonempty) (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
t.Nonempty :=
t.eq_empty_or_nonempty.resolve_left fun ht ↦ fin (ht.symm ▸ hausdorffEdist_empty hs)
#align emetric.nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
theorem empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top (fin : hausdorffEdist s t ≠ ⊤) :
(s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅) ∨ (s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with hs | hs
· rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ht | ht
· exact Or.inl ⟨hs, ht⟩
· rw [hausdorffEdist_comm] at fin
exact Or.inr ⟨nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top ht fin, ht⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hs, nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top hs fin⟩
#align emetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_Hausdorff_edist_ne_top EMetric.empty_or_nonempty_of_hausdorffEdist_ne_top
end HausdorffEdist
-- section
end EMetric
/-! Now, we turn to the same notions in metric spaces. To avoid the difficulties related to
`sInf` and `sSup` on `ℝ` (which is only conditionally complete), we use the notions in `ℝ≥0∞`
formulated in terms of the edistance, and coerce them to `ℝ`.
Then their properties follow readily from the corresponding properties in `ℝ≥0∞`,
modulo some tedious rewriting of inequalities from one to the other. -/
--namespace
namespace Metric
section
variable [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] {s t u : Set α} {x y : α} {Φ : α → β}
open EMetric
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ`. -/
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set -/
def infDist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
ENNReal.toReal (infEdist x s)
#align metric.inf_dist Metric.infDist
theorem infDist_eq_iInf : infDist x s = ⨅ y : s, dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infEdist, iInf_subtype', ENNReal.toReal_iInf]
· simp only [dist_edist]
· exact fun _ ↦ edist_ne_top _ _
#align metric.inf_dist_eq_infi Metric.infDist_eq_iInf
/-- The minimal distance is always nonnegative -/
theorem infDist_nonneg : 0 ≤ infDist x s := toReal_nonneg
#align metric.inf_dist_nonneg Metric.infDist_nonneg
/-- The minimal distance to the empty set is 0 (if you want to have the more reasonable
value `∞` instead, use `EMetric.infEdist`, which takes values in `ℝ≥0∞`) -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_empty : infDist x ∅ = 0 := by simp [infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_empty Metric.infDist_empty
/-- In a metric space, the minimal edistance to a nonempty set is finite. -/
theorem infEdist_ne_top (h : s.Nonempty) : infEdist x s ≠ ⊤ := by
rcases h with ⟨y, hy⟩
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem hy)
#align metric.inf_edist_ne_top Metric.infEdist_ne_top
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma;
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: make it a `simp` lemma
theorem infEdist_eq_top_iff : infEdist x s = ∞ ↔ s = ∅ := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs <;> simp [*, Nonempty.ne_empty, infEdist_ne_top]
/-- The minimal distance of a point to a set containing it vanishes. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [infEdist_zero_of_mem h, infDist]
#align metric.inf_dist_zero_of_mem Metric.infDist_zero_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance to a singleton is the distance to the unique point in this singleton. -/
@[simp]
theorem infDist_singleton : infDist x {y} = dist x y := by simp [infDist, dist_edist]
#align metric.inf_dist_singleton Metric.infDist_singleton
/-- The minimal distance to a set is bounded by the distance to any point in this set. -/
theorem infDist_le_dist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infDist x s ≤ dist x y := by
rw [dist_edist, infDist]
exact ENNReal.toReal_mono (edist_ne_top _ _) (infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_dist_of_mem Metric.infDist_le_dist_of_mem
/-- The minimal distance is monotone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x t ≤ infDist x s :=
ENNReal.toReal_mono (infEdist_ne_top hs) (infEdist_anti h)
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_of_subset Metric.infDist_le_infDist_of_subset
/-- The minimal distance to a set `s` is `< r` iff there exists a point in `s` at distance `< r`. -/
theorem infDist_lt_iff {r : ℝ} (hs : s.Nonempty) : infDist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, dist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infDist, ← ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top hs), infEdist_lt_iff,
ENNReal.lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _), ← dist_edist]
#align metric.inf_dist_lt_iff Metric.infDist_lt_iff
/-- The minimal distance from `x` to `s` is bounded by the distance from `y` to `s`, modulo
the distance between `x` and `y`. -/
theorem infDist_le_infDist_add_dist : infDist x s ≤ infDist y s + dist x y := by
rw [infDist, infDist, dist_edist]
refine ENNReal.toReal_le_add' infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist ?_ (flip absurd (edist_ne_top _ _))
simp only [infEdist_eq_top_iff, imp_self]
#align metric.inf_dist_le_inf_dist_add_dist Metric.infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
theorem not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist (h : dist x y < infDist x s) : y ∉ s := fun hy =>
h.not_le <| infDist_le_dist_of_mem hy
#align metric.not_mem_of_dist_lt_inf_dist Metric.not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist
theorem disjoint_ball_infDist : Disjoint (ball x (infDist x s)) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _y hy => not_mem_of_dist_lt_infDist <| mem_ball'.1 hy
#align metric.disjoint_ball_inf_dist Metric.disjoint_ball_infDist
theorem ball_infDist_subset_compl : ball x (infDist x s) ⊆ sᶜ :=
(disjoint_ball_infDist (s := s)).subset_compl_right
#align metric.ball_inf_dist_subset_compl Metric.ball_infDist_subset_compl
theorem ball_infDist_compl_subset : ball x (infDist x sᶜ) ⊆ s :=
ball_infDist_subset_compl.trans_eq (compl_compl s)
#align metric.ball_inf_dist_compl_subset Metric.ball_infDist_compl_subset
theorem disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist {r : ℝ} (h : r < infDist x s) :
Disjoint (closedBall x r) s :=
disjoint_ball_infDist.mono_left <| closedBall_subset_ball h
#align metric.disjoint_closed_ball_of_lt_inf_dist Metric.disjoint_closedBall_of_lt_infDist
theorem dist_le_infDist_add_diam (hs : IsBounded s) (hy : y ∈ s) :
dist x y ≤ infDist x s + diam s := by
rw [infDist, diam, dist_edist]
exact toReal_le_add (edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam hy) (infEdist_ne_top ⟨y, hy⟩) hs.ediam_ne_top
#align metric.dist_le_inf_dist_add_diam Metric.dist_le_infDist_add_diam
variable (s)
/-- The minimal distance to a set is Lipschitz in point with constant 1 -/
theorem lipschitz_infDist_pt : LipschitzWith 1 (infDist · s) :=
LipschitzWith.of_le_add fun _ _ => infDist_le_infDist_add_dist
#align metric.lipschitz_inf_dist_pt Metric.lipschitz_infDist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set is uniformly continuous in point -/
theorem uniformContinuous_infDist_pt : UniformContinuous (infDist · s) :=
(lipschitz_infDist_pt s).uniformContinuous
#align metric.uniform_continuous_inf_dist_pt Metric.uniformContinuous_infDist_pt
/-- The minimal distance to a set is continuous in point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infDist_pt : Continuous (infDist · s) :=
(uniformContinuous_infDist_pt s).continuous
#align metric.continuous_inf_dist_pt Metric.continuous_infDist_pt
variable {s}
/-- The minimal distances to a set and its closure coincide. -/
theorem infDist_closure : infDist x (closure s) = infDist x s := by
simp [infDist, infEdist_closure]
#align metric.inf_dist_eq_closure Metric.infDist_closure
/-- If a point belongs to the closure of `s`, then its infimum distance to `s` equals zero.
The converse is true provided that `s` is nonempty, see `Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero`. -/
theorem infDist_zero_of_mem_closure (hx : x ∈ closure s) : infDist x s = 0 := by
rw [← infDist_closure]
exact infDist_zero_of_mem hx
#align metric.inf_dist_zero_of_mem_closure Metric.infDist_zero_of_mem_closure
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero (h : s.Nonempty) : x ∈ closure s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, infDist, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff, infEdist_ne_top h]
#align metric.mem_closure_iff_inf_dist_zero Metric.mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∈ s ↔ infDist x s = 0 := by rw [← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs, h.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.mem_iff_inf_dist_zero IsClosed.mem_iff_infDist_zero
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum distance to this set vanishes. -/
theorem _root_.IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos (h : IsClosed s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
x ∉ s ↔ 0 < infDist x s := by
simp [h.mem_iff_infDist_zero hs, infDist_nonneg.gt_iff_ne]
#align is_closed.not_mem_iff_inf_dist_pos IsClosed.not_mem_iff_infDist_pos
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 626 | 631 | theorem continuousAt_inv_infDist_pt (h : x ∉ closure s) :
ContinuousAt (fun x ↦ (infDist x s)⁻¹) x := by |
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs)
· simp only [infDist_empty, continuousAt_const]
· refine (continuous_infDist_pt s).continuousAt.inv₀ ?_
rwa [Ne, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero hs]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 224 | 227 | theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by |
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.TrailingDegree
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.EraseLead
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
#align_import data.polynomial.reverse from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"44de64f183393284a16016dfb2a48ac97382f2bd"
/-!
# Reverse of a univariate polynomial
The main definition is `reverse`. Applying `reverse` to a polynomial `f : R[X]` produces
the polynomial with a reversed list of coefficients, equivalent to `X^f.natDegree * f(1/X)`.
The main result is that `reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g`, provided the leading
coefficients of `f` and `g` do not multiply to zero.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Polynomial Finsupp Finset
open Polynomial
section Semiring
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAtFun N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
This is the map used by the embedding `revAt`.
-/
def revAtFun (N i : ℕ) : ℕ :=
ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun Polynomial.revAtFun
theorem revAtFun_invol {N i : ℕ} : revAtFun N (revAtFun N i) = i := by
unfold revAtFun
split_ifs with h j
· exact tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le h
· exfalso
apply j
exact Nat.sub_le N i
· rfl
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_invol Polynomial.revAtFun_invol
theorem revAtFun_inj {N : ℕ} : Function.Injective (revAtFun N) := by
intro a b hab
rw [← @revAtFun_invol N a, hab, revAtFun_invol]
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_inj Polynomial.revAtFun_inj
/-- If `i ≤ N`, then `revAt N i` returns `N - i`, otherwise it returns `i`.
Essentially, this embedding is only used for `i ≤ N`.
The advantage of `revAt N i` over `N - i` is that `revAt` is an involution.
-/
def revAt (N : ℕ) : Function.Embedding ℕ ℕ where
toFun i := ite (i ≤ N) (N - i) i
inj' := revAtFun_inj
#align polynomial.rev_at Polynomial.revAt
/-- We prefer to use the bundled `revAt` over unbundled `revAtFun`. -/
@[simp]
theorem revAtFun_eq (N i : ℕ) : revAtFun N i = revAt N i :=
rfl
#align polynomial.rev_at_fun_eq Polynomial.revAtFun_eq
@[simp]
theorem revAt_invol {N i : ℕ} : (revAt N) (revAt N i) = i :=
revAtFun_invol
#align polynomial.rev_at_invol Polynomial.revAt_invol
@[simp]
theorem revAt_le {N i : ℕ} (H : i ≤ N) : revAt N i = N - i :=
if_pos H
#align polynomial.rev_at_le Polynomial.revAt_le
lemma revAt_eq_self_of_lt {N i : ℕ} (h : N < i) : revAt N i = i := by simp [revAt, Nat.not_le.mpr h]
theorem revAt_add {N O n o : ℕ} (hn : n ≤ N) (ho : o ≤ O) :
revAt (N + O) (n + o) = revAt N n + revAt O o := by
rcases Nat.le.dest hn with ⟨n', rfl⟩
rcases Nat.le.dest ho with ⟨o', rfl⟩
repeat' rw [revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
rw [add_assoc, add_left_comm n' o, ← add_assoc, revAt_le (le_add_right rfl.le)]
repeat' rw [add_tsub_cancel_left]
#align polynomial.rev_at_add Polynomial.revAt_add
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem revAt_zero (N : ℕ) : revAt N 0 = N := by simp
#align polynomial.rev_at_zero Polynomial.revAt_zero
/-- `reflect N f` is the polynomial such that `(reflect N f).coeff i = f.coeff (revAt N i)`.
In other words, the terms with exponent `[0, ..., N]` now have exponent `[N, ..., 0]`.
In practice, `reflect` is only used when `N` is at least as large as the degree of `f`.
Eventually, it will be used with `N` exactly equal to the degree of `f`. -/
noncomputable def reflect (N : ℕ) : R[X] → R[X]
| ⟨f⟩ => ⟨Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f⟩
#align polynomial.reflect Polynomial.reflect
theorem reflect_support (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) :
(reflect N f).support = Finset.image (revAt N) f.support := by
rcases f with ⟨⟩
ext1
simp only [reflect, support_ofFinsupp, support_embDomain, Finset.mem_map, Finset.mem_image]
#align polynomial.reflect_support Polynomial.reflect_support
@[simp]
theorem coeff_reflect (N : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (i : ℕ) : coeff (reflect N f) i = f.coeff (revAt N i) := by
rcases f with ⟨f⟩
simp only [reflect, coeff]
calc
Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f i = Finsupp.embDomain (revAt N) f (revAt N (revAt N i)) := by
rw [revAt_invol]
_ = f (revAt N i) := Finsupp.embDomain_apply _ _ _
#align polynomial.coeff_reflect Polynomial.coeff_reflect
@[simp]
theorem reflect_zero {N : ℕ} : reflect N (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.reflect_zero Polynomial.reflect_zero
@[simp]
theorem reflect_eq_zero_iff {N : ℕ} {f : R[X]} : reflect N (f : R[X]) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [ofFinsupp_eq_zero, reflect, embDomain_eq_zero, ofFinsupp_eq_zero]
#align polynomial.reflect_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.reflect_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem reflect_add (f g : R[X]) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (f + g) = reflect N f + reflect N g := by
ext
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_reflect]
#align polynomial.reflect_add Polynomial.reflect_add
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C_mul (f : R[X]) (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r * f) = C r * reflect N f := by
ext
simp only [coeff_reflect, coeff_C_mul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.reflect_C_mul Polynomial.reflect_C_mul
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this (once `reflect_monomial` is in simp scope)
theorem reflect_C_mul_X_pow (N n : ℕ) {c : R} : reflect N (C c * X ^ n) = C c * X ^ revAt N n := by
ext
rw [reflect_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_X_pow, coeff_reflect]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, revAt_invol, coeff_X_pow_self]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff.mp]
intro a
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← C_1] at a
apply h
rw [← mem_support_C_mul_X_pow a, revAt_invol]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.reflect_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.reflect_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem reflect_C (r : R) (N : ℕ) : reflect N (C r) = C r * X ^ N := by
conv_lhs => rw [← mul_one (C r), ← pow_zero X, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, revAt_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.reflect_C Polynomial.reflect_C
@[simp]
theorem reflect_monomial (N n : ℕ) : reflect N ((X : R[X]) ^ n) = X ^ revAt N n := by
rw [← one_mul (X ^ n), ← one_mul (X ^ revAt N n), ← C_1, reflect_C_mul_X_pow]
#align polynomial.reflect_monomial Polynomial.reflect_monomial
@[simp] lemma reflect_one_X : reflect 1 (X : R[X]) = 1 := by
simpa using reflect_monomial 1 1 (R := R)
theorem reflect_mul_induction (cf cg : ℕ) :
∀ N O : ℕ,
∀ f g : R[X],
f.support.card ≤ cf.succ →
g.support.card ≤ cg.succ →
f.natDegree ≤ N →
g.natDegree ≤ O → reflect (N + O) (f * g) = reflect N f * reflect O g := by
induction' cf with cf hcf
--first induction (left): base case
· induction' cg with cg hcg
-- second induction (right): base case
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cf, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_self Cg]
simp_rw [mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ← pow_add (X : R[X]), reflect_C_mul,
reflect_monomial, add_comm, revAt_add Nf Og, mul_assoc, X_pow_mul, mul_assoc, ←
pow_add (X : R[X]), add_comm]
-- second induction (right): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases g0 : g = 0
· rw [g0, reflect_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow g, mul_add, reflect_add, reflect_add, mul_add, hcg, hcg] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le g.leadingCoeff g.natDegree) Og
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cg (eraseLead_support_card_lt g0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Og
--first induction (left): induction step
· intro N O f g Cf Cg Nf Og
by_cases f0 : f = 0
· rw [f0, reflect_zero, zero_mul, zero_mul, reflect_zero]
rw [← eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow f, add_mul, reflect_add, reflect_add, add_mul, hcf, hcf] <;>
try assumption
· exact le_add_left card_support_C_mul_X_pow_le_one
· exact le_trans (natDegree_C_mul_X_pow_le f.leadingCoeff f.natDegree) Nf
· exact Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp (gt_of_ge_of_gt Cf (eraseLead_support_card_lt f0))
· exact le_trans eraseLead_natDegree_le_aux Nf
#align polynomial.reflect_mul_induction Polynomial.reflect_mul_induction
@[simp]
theorem reflect_mul (f g : R[X]) {F G : ℕ} (Ff : f.natDegree ≤ F) (Gg : g.natDegree ≤ G) :
reflect (F + G) (f * g) = reflect F f * reflect G g :=
reflect_mul_induction _ _ F G f g f.support.card.le_succ g.support.card.le_succ Ff Gg
#align polynomial.reflect_mul Polynomial.reflect_mul
section Eval₂
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S]
theorem eval₂_reflect_mul_pow (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f := by
refine
induction_with_natDegree_le (fun f => eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) * x ^ N = eval₂ i x f) _ ?_ ?_
?_ f hf
· simp
· intro n r _ hnN
simp only [revAt_le hnN, reflect_C_mul_X_pow, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_C, eval₂_mul]
conv in x ^ N => rw [← Nat.sub_add_cancel hnN]
rw [pow_add, ← mul_assoc, mul_assoc (i r), ← mul_pow, invOf_mul_self, one_pow, mul_one]
· intros
simp [*, add_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_reflect_mul_pow Polynomial.eval₂_reflect_mul_pow
theorem eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff (i : R →+* S) (x : S) [Invertible x] (N : ℕ) (f : R[X])
(hf : f.natDegree ≤ N) : eval₂ i (⅟ x) (reflect N f) = 0 ↔ eval₂ i x f = 0 := by
conv_rhs => rw [← eval₂_reflect_mul_pow i x N f hf]
constructor
· intro h
rw [h, zero_mul]
· intro h
rw [← mul_one (eval₂ i (⅟ x) _), ← one_pow N, ← mul_invOf_self x, mul_pow, ← mul_assoc, h,
zero_mul]
#align polynomial.eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff Polynomial.eval₂_reflect_eq_zero_iff
end Eval₂
/-- The reverse of a polynomial f is the polynomial obtained by "reading f backwards".
Even though this is not the actual definition, `reverse f = f (1/X) * X ^ f.natDegree`. -/
noncomputable def reverse (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
reflect f.natDegree f
#align polynomial.reverse Polynomial.reverse
theorem coeff_reverse (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : f.reverse.coeff n = f.coeff (revAt f.natDegree n) := by
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect]
#align polynomial.coeff_reverse Polynomial.coeff_reverse
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_reverse (f : R[X]) : coeff (reverse f) 0 = leadingCoeff f := by
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt_le (zero_le f.natDegree), tsub_zero, leadingCoeff]
#align polynomial.coeff_zero_reverse Polynomial.coeff_zero_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_zero : reverse (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
rfl
#align polynomial.reverse_zero Polynomial.reverse_zero
@[simp]
theorem reverse_eq_zero : f.reverse = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp [reverse]
#align polynomial.reverse_eq_zero Polynomial.reverse_eq_zero
theorem reverse_natDegree_le (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natDegree ≤ f.natDegree := by
rw [natDegree_le_iff_degree_le, degree_le_iff_coeff_zero]
intro n hn
rw [Nat.cast_lt] at hn
rw [coeff_reverse, revAt, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, if_neg (not_le_of_gt hn),
coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt hn]
#align polynomial.reverse_nat_degree_le Polynomial.reverse_natDegree_le
theorem natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree (f : R[X]) :
f.natDegree = f.reverse.natDegree + f.natTrailingDegree := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, reverse_zero, natDegree_zero, natTrailingDegree_zero]
apply le_antisymm
· refine tsub_le_iff_right.mp ?_
apply le_natDegree_of_ne_zero
rw [reverse, coeff_reflect, ← revAt_le f.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree, revAt_invol]
exact trailingCoeff_nonzero_iff_nonzero.mpr hf
· rw [← le_tsub_iff_left f.reverse_natDegree_le]
apply natTrailingDegree_le_of_ne_zero
have key := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.mp (mt reverse_eq_zero.mp hf)
rwa [leadingCoeff, coeff_reverse, revAt_le f.reverse_natDegree_le] at key
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_reverse_nat_degree_add_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree
theorem reverse_natDegree (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natDegree = f.natDegree - f.natTrailingDegree := by
rw [f.natDegree_eq_reverse_natDegree_add_natTrailingDegree, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align polynomial.reverse_nat_degree Polynomial.reverse_natDegree
theorem reverse_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.leadingCoeff = f.trailingCoeff := by
rw [leadingCoeff, reverse_natDegree, ← revAt_le f.natTrailingDegree_le_natDegree,
coeff_reverse, revAt_invol, trailingCoeff]
#align polynomial.reverse_leading_coeff Polynomial.reverse_leadingCoeff
theorem natTrailingDegree_reverse (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.natTrailingDegree = 0 := by
rw [natTrailingDegree_eq_zero, reverse_eq_zero, coeff_zero_reverse, leadingCoeff_ne_zero]
exact eq_or_ne _ _
#align polynomial.reverse_nat_trailing_degree Polynomial.natTrailingDegree_reverse
theorem reverse_trailingCoeff (f : R[X]) : f.reverse.trailingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
rw [trailingCoeff, natTrailingDegree_reverse, coeff_zero_reverse]
#align polynomial.reverse_trailing_coeff Polynomial.reverse_trailingCoeff
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Reverse.lean | 313 | 316 | theorem reverse_mul {f g : R[X]} (fg : f.leadingCoeff * g.leadingCoeff ≠ 0) :
reverse (f * g) = reverse f * reverse g := by |
unfold reverse
rw [natDegree_mul' fg, reflect_mul f g rfl.le rfl.le]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import data.set.finite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"65a1391a0106c9204fe45bc73a039f056558cb83"
/-!
# Finite sets
This file defines predicates for finite and infinite sets and provides
`Fintype` instances for many set constructions. It also proves basic facts
about finite sets and gives ways to manipulate `Set.Finite` expressions.
## Main definitions
* `Set.Finite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.Infinite : Set α → Prop`
* `Set.toFinite` to prove `Set.Finite` for a `Set` from a `Finite` instance.
* `Set.Finite.toFinset` to noncomputably produce a `Finset` from a `Set.Finite` proof.
(See `Set.toFinset` for a computable version.)
## Implementation
A finite set is defined to be a set whose coercion to a type has a `Finite` instance.
There are two components to finiteness constructions. The first is `Fintype` instances for each
construction. This gives a way to actually compute a `Finset` that represents the set, and these
may be accessed using `set.toFinset`. This gets the `Finset` in the correct form, since otherwise
`Finset.univ : Finset s` is a `Finset` for the subtype for `s`. The second component is
"constructors" for `Set.Finite` that give proofs that `Fintype` instances exist classically given
other `Set.Finite` proofs. Unlike the `Fintype` instances, these *do not* use any decidability
instances since they do not compute anything.
## Tags
finite sets
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedRing
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set Function
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {γ : Type x}
namespace Set
/-- A set is finite if the corresponding `Subtype` is finite,
i.e., if there exists a natural `n : ℕ` and an equivalence `s ≃ Fin n`. -/
protected def Finite (s : Set α) : Prop := Finite s
#align set.finite Set.Finite
-- The `protected` attribute does not take effect within the same namespace block.
end Set
namespace Set
theorem finite_def {s : Set α} : s.Finite ↔ Nonempty (Fintype s) :=
finite_iff_nonempty_fintype s
#align set.finite_def Set.finite_def
protected alias ⟨Finite.nonempty_fintype, _⟩ := finite_def
#align set.finite.nonempty_fintype Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype
theorem finite_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Finite s ↔ s.Finite := .rfl
#align set.finite_coe_iff Set.finite_coe_iff
/-- Constructor for `Set.Finite` using a `Finite` instance. -/
theorem toFinite (s : Set α) [Finite s] : s.Finite := ‹_›
#align set.to_finite Set.toFinite
/-- Construct a `Finite` instance for a `Set` from a `Finset` with the same elements. -/
protected theorem Finite.ofFinset {p : Set α} (s : Finset α) (H : ∀ x, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ p) : p.Finite :=
have := Fintype.ofFinset s H; p.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_finset Set.Finite.ofFinset
/-- Projection of `Set.Finite` to its `Finite` instance.
This is intended to be used with dot notation.
See also `Set.Finite.Fintype` and `Set.Finite.nonempty_fintype`. -/
protected theorem Finite.to_subtype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finite s := h
#align set.finite.to_subtype Set.Finite.to_subtype
/-- A finite set coerced to a type is a `Fintype`.
This is the `Fintype` projection for a `Set.Finite`.
Note that because `Finite` isn't a typeclass, this definition will not fire if it
is made into an instance -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.fintype {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Fintype s :=
h.nonempty_fintype.some
#align set.finite.fintype Set.Finite.fintype
/-- Using choice, get the `Finset` that represents this `Set`. -/
protected noncomputable def Finite.toFinset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : Finset α :=
@Set.toFinset _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset
theorem Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset {s : Set α} [Fintype s] (h : s.Finite) :
h.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
-- Porting note: was `rw [Finite.toFinset]; congr`
-- in Lean 4, a goal is left after `congr`
have : h.fintype = ‹_› := Subsingleton.elim _ _
rw [Finite.toFinset, this]
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem toFinite_toFinset (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : s.toFinite.toFinset = s.toFinset :=
s.toFinite.toFinset_eq_toFinset
#align set.to_finite_to_finset Set.toFinite_toFinset
theorem Finite.exists_finset {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) :
∃ s' : Finset α, ∀ a : α, a ∈ s' ↔ a ∈ s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, fun _ => mem_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset Set.Finite.exists_finset
theorem Finite.exists_finset_coe {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) : ∃ s' : Finset α, ↑s' = s := by
cases h.nonempty_fintype
exact ⟨s.toFinset, s.coe_toFinset⟩
#align set.finite.exists_finset_coe Set.Finite.exists_finset_coe
/-- Finite sets can be lifted to finsets. -/
instance : CanLift (Set α) (Finset α) (↑) Set.Finite where prf _ hs := hs.exists_finset_coe
/-- A set is infinite if it is not finite.
This is protected so that it does not conflict with global `Infinite`. -/
protected def Infinite (s : Set α) : Prop :=
¬s.Finite
#align set.infinite Set.Infinite
@[simp]
theorem not_infinite {s : Set α} : ¬s.Infinite ↔ s.Finite :=
not_not
#align set.not_infinite Set.not_infinite
alias ⟨_, Finite.not_infinite⟩ := not_infinite
#align set.finite.not_infinite Set.Finite.not_infinite
attribute [simp] Finite.not_infinite
/-- See also `finite_or_infinite`, `fintypeOrInfinite`. -/
protected theorem finite_or_infinite (s : Set α) : s.Finite ∨ s.Infinite :=
em _
#align set.finite_or_infinite Set.finite_or_infinite
protected theorem infinite_or_finite (s : Set α) : s.Infinite ∨ s.Finite :=
em' _
#align set.infinite_or_finite Set.infinite_or_finite
/-! ### Basic properties of `Set.Finite.toFinset` -/
namespace Finite
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α} (hs : s.Finite) {ht : t.Finite}
@[simp]
protected theorem mem_toFinset : a ∈ hs.toFinset ↔ a ∈ s :=
@mem_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype _
#align set.finite.mem_to_finset Set.Finite.mem_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem coe_toFinset : (hs.toFinset : Set α) = s :=
@coe_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype
#align set.finite.coe_to_finset Set.Finite.coe_toFinset
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_nonempty : hs.toFinset.Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [← Finset.coe_nonempty, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_nonempty Set.Finite.toFinset_nonempty
/-- Note that this is an equality of types not holding definitionally. Use wisely. -/
theorem coeSort_toFinset : ↥hs.toFinset = ↥s := by
rw [← Finset.coe_sort_coe _, hs.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.coe_sort_to_finset Set.Finite.coeSort_toFinset
/-- The identity map, bundled as an equivalence between the subtypes of `s : Set α` and of
`h.toFinset : Finset α`, where `h` is a proof of finiteness of `s`. -/
@[simps!] def subtypeEquivToFinset : {x // x ∈ s} ≃ {x // x ∈ hs.toFinset} :=
(Equiv.refl α).subtypeEquiv fun _ ↦ hs.mem_toFinset.symm
variable {hs}
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_inj : hs.toFinset = ht.toFinset ↔ s = t :=
@toFinset_inj _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_inj Set.Finite.toFinset_inj
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_subset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_ssubset {t : Finset α} : hs.toFinset ⊂ t ↔ s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem subset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊆ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.subset_to_finset Set.Finite.subset_toFinset
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_toFinset {s : Finset α} : s ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ ↑s ⊂ t := by
rw [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.ssubset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_subset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊆ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_subset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_subset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
@[mono]
protected theorem toFinset_ssubset_toFinset : hs.toFinset ⊂ ht.toFinset ↔ s ⊂ t := by
simp only [← Finset.coe_ssubset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align set.finite.to_finset_ssubset_to_finset Set.Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
alias ⟨_, toFinset_mono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_subset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_mono
alias ⟨_, toFinset_strictMono⟩ := Finite.toFinset_ssubset_toFinset
#align set.finite.to_finset_strict_mono Set.Finite.toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: attribute [protected] doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] toFinset_mono toFinset_strictMono
-- Porting note: `simp` can simplify LHS but then it simplifies something
-- in the generated `Fintype {x | p x}` instance and fails to apply `Set.toFinset_setOf`
@[simp high]
protected theorem toFinset_setOf [Fintype α] (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
(h : { x | p x }.Finite) : h.toFinset = Finset.univ.filter p := by
ext
-- Porting note: `simp` doesn't use the `simp` lemma `Set.toFinset_setOf` without the `_`
simp [Set.toFinset_setOf _]
#align set.finite.to_finset_set_of Set.Finite.toFinset_setOf
@[simp]
nonrec theorem disjoint_toFinset {hs : s.Finite} {ht : t.Finite} :
Disjoint hs.toFinset ht.toFinset ↔ Disjoint s t :=
@disjoint_toFinset _ _ _ hs.fintype ht.fintype
#align set.finite.disjoint_to_finset Set.Finite.disjoint_toFinset
protected theorem toFinset_inter [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∩ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∩ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_inter Set.Finite.toFinset_inter
protected theorem toFinset_union [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∪ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∪ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_union Set.Finite.toFinset_union
protected theorem toFinset_diff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s \ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset \ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_diff
open scoped symmDiff in
protected theorem toFinset_symmDiff [DecidableEq α] (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite)
(h : (s ∆ t).Finite) : h.toFinset = hs.toFinset ∆ ht.toFinset := by
ext
simp [mem_symmDiff, Finset.mem_symmDiff]
#align set.finite.to_finset_symm_diff Set.Finite.toFinset_symmDiff
protected theorem toFinset_compl [DecidableEq α] [Fintype α] (hs : s.Finite) (h : sᶜ.Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinsetᶜ := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_compl Set.Finite.toFinset_compl
protected theorem toFinset_univ [Fintype α] (h : (Set.univ : Set α).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_univ
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_empty {h : s.Finite} : h.toFinset = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
@toFinset_eq_empty _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_empty
protected theorem toFinset_empty (h : (∅ : Set α).Finite) : h.toFinset = ∅ := by
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_empty Set.Finite.toFinset_empty
@[simp]
protected theorem toFinset_eq_univ [Fintype α] {h : s.Finite} :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ ↔ s = univ :=
@toFinset_eq_univ _ _ _ h.fintype
#align set.finite.to_finset_eq_univ Set.Finite.toFinset_eq_univ
protected theorem toFinset_image [DecidableEq β] (f : α → β) (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).Finite) :
h.toFinset = hs.toFinset.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_image Set.Finite.toFinset_image
-- Porting note (#10618): now `simp` can prove it but it needs the `fintypeRange` instance
-- from the next section
protected theorem toFinset_range [DecidableEq α] [Fintype β] (f : β → α) (h : (range f).Finite) :
h.toFinset = Finset.univ.image f := by
ext
simp
#align set.finite.to_finset_range Set.Finite.toFinset_range
end Finite
/-! ### Fintype instances
Every instance here should have a corresponding `Set.Finite` constructor in the next section.
-/
section FintypeInstances
instance fintypeUniv [Fintype α] : Fintype (@univ α) :=
Fintype.ofEquiv α (Equiv.Set.univ α).symm
#align set.fintype_univ Set.fintypeUniv
/-- If `(Set.univ : Set α)` is finite then `α` is a finite type. -/
noncomputable def fintypeOfFiniteUniv (H : (univ (α := α)).Finite) : Fintype α :=
@Fintype.ofEquiv _ (univ : Set α) H.fintype (Equiv.Set.univ _)
#align set.fintype_of_finite_univ Set.fintypeOfFiniteUniv
instance fintypeUnion [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∪ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∪ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_union Set.fintypeUnion
instance fintypeSep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred p] :
Fintype ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter p) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_sep Set.fintypeSep
instance fintypeInter (s t : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ∩ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter Set.fintypeInter
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the left set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.filter (· ∈ t)) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_inter_of_left Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
/-- A `Fintype` instance for set intersection where the right set has a `Fintype` instance. -/
instance fintypeInterOfRight (s t : Set α) [Fintype t] [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] :
Fintype (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (t.toFinset.filter (· ∈ s)) <| by simp [and_comm]
#align set.fintype_inter_of_right Set.fintypeInterOfRight
/-- A `Fintype` structure on a set defines a `Fintype` structure on its subset. -/
def fintypeSubset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] (h : t ⊆ s) :
Fintype t := by
rw [← inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
apply Set.fintypeInterOfLeft
#align set.fintype_subset Set.fintypeSubset
instance fintypeDiff [DecidableEq α] (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset \ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_diff Set.fintypeDiff
instance fintypeDiffLeft (s t : Set α) [Fintype s] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
Fintype (s \ t : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSep s (· ∈ tᶜ)
#align set.fintype_diff_left Set.fintypeDiffLeft
instance fintypeiUnion [DecidableEq α] [Fintype (PLift ι)] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Fintype (f i)] :
Fintype (⋃ i, f i) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.biUnion fun i : PLift ι => (f i.down).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_Union Set.fintypeiUnion
instance fintypesUnion [DecidableEq α] {s : Set (Set α)} [Fintype s]
[H : ∀ t : s, Fintype (t : Set α)] : Fintype (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Set.fintypeiUnion _ _ _ _ _ H
#align set.fintype_sUnion Set.fintypesUnion
/-- A union of sets with `Fintype` structure over a set with `Fintype` structure has a `Fintype`
structure. -/
def fintypeBiUnion [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Fintype (t i)) : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
haveI : ∀ i : toFinset s, Fintype (t i) := fun i => H i (mem_toFinset.1 i.2)
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.attach.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) fun x => by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion Set.fintypeBiUnion
instance fintypeBiUnion' [DecidableEq α] {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Fintype s] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Fintype (t i)] : Fintype (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.biUnion fun x => (t x).toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_bUnion' Set.fintypeBiUnion'
section monad
attribute [local instance] Set.monad
/-- If `s : Set α` is a set with `Fintype` instance and `f : α → Set β` is a function such that
each `f a`, `a ∈ s`, has a `Fintype` structure, then `s >>= f` has a `Fintype` structure. -/
def fintypeBind {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
(H : ∀ a ∈ s, Fintype (f a)) : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion s f H
#align set.fintype_bind Set.fintypeBind
instance fintypeBind' {α β} [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (f : α → Set β)
[∀ a, Fintype (f a)] : Fintype (s >>= f) :=
Set.fintypeBiUnion' s f
#align set.fintype_bind' Set.fintypeBind'
end monad
instance fintypeEmpty : Fintype (∅ : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ∅ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_empty Set.fintypeEmpty
instance fintypeSingleton (a : α) : Fintype ({a} : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset {a} <| by simp
#align set.fintype_singleton Set.fintypeSingleton
instance fintypePure : ∀ a : α, Fintype (pure a : Set α) :=
Set.fintypeSingleton
#align set.fintype_pure Set.fintypePure
/-- A `Fintype` instance for inserting an element into a `Set` using the
corresponding `insert` function on `Finset`. This requires `DecidableEq α`.
There is also `Set.fintypeInsert'` when `a ∈ s` is decidable. -/
instance fintypeInsert (a : α) (s : Set α) [DecidableEq α] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (insert a s.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert Set.fintypeInsert
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a new element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfNotMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∉ s) :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨a ::ₘ s.toFinset.1, s.toFinset.nodup.cons (by simp [h])⟩ <| by simp
#align set.fintype_insert_of_not_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem
/-- A `Fintype` structure on `insert a s` when inserting a pre-existing element. -/
def fintypeInsertOfMem {a : α} (s : Set α) [Fintype s] (h : a ∈ s) : Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset <| by simp [h]
#align set.fintype_insert_of_mem Set.fintypeInsertOfMem
/-- The `Set.fintypeInsert` instance requires decidable equality, but when `a ∈ s`
is decidable for this particular `a` we can still get a `Fintype` instance by using
`Set.fintypeInsertOfNotMem` or `Set.fintypeInsertOfMem`.
This instance pre-dates `Set.fintypeInsert`, and it is less efficient.
When `Set.decidableMemOfFintype` is made a local instance, then this instance would
override `Set.fintypeInsert` if not for the fact that its priority has been
adjusted. See Note [lower instance priority]. -/
instance (priority := 100) fintypeInsert' (a : α) (s : Set α) [Decidable <| a ∈ s] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (insert a s : Set α) :=
if h : a ∈ s then fintypeInsertOfMem s h else fintypeInsertOfNotMem s h
#align set.fintype_insert' Set.fintypeInsert'
instance fintypeImage [DecidableEq β] (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s] : Fintype (f '' s) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset.image f) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_image Set.fintypeImage
/-- If a function `f` has a partial inverse and sends a set `s` to a set with `[Fintype]` instance,
then `s` has a `Fintype` structure as well. -/
def fintypeOfFintypeImage (s : Set α) {f : α → β} {g} (I : IsPartialInv f g) [Fintype (f '' s)] :
Fintype s :=
Fintype.ofFinset ⟨_, (f '' s).toFinset.2.filterMap g <| injective_of_isPartialInv_right I⟩
fun a => by
suffices (∃ b x, f x = b ∧ g b = some a ∧ x ∈ s) ↔ a ∈ s by
simpa [exists_and_left.symm, and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
rw [exists_swap]
suffices (∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ g (f x) = some a) ↔ a ∈ s by simpa [and_comm, and_left_comm, and_assoc]
simp [I _, (injective_of_isPartialInv I).eq_iff]
#align set.fintype_of_fintype_image Set.fintypeOfFintypeImage
instance fintypeRange [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) [Fintype (PLift ι)] : Fintype (range f) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.univ.image <| f ∘ PLift.down) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_range Set.fintypeRange
instance fintypeMap {α β} [DecidableEq β] :
∀ (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Fintype s], Fintype (f <$> s) :=
Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_map Set.fintypeMap
instance fintypeLTNat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i < n } :=
Fintype.ofFinset (Finset.range n) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_lt_nat Set.fintypeLTNat
instance fintypeLENat (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i | i ≤ n } := by
simpa [Nat.lt_succ_iff] using Set.fintypeLTNat (n + 1)
#align set.fintype_le_nat Set.fintypeLENat
/-- This is not an instance so that it does not conflict with the one
in `Mathlib/Order/LocallyFinite.lean`. -/
def Nat.fintypeIio (n : ℕ) : Fintype (Iio n) :=
Set.fintypeLTNat n
#align set.nat.fintype_Iio Set.Nat.fintypeIio
instance fintypeProd (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Fintype s] [Fintype t] :
Fintype (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Fintype.ofFinset (s.toFinset ×ˢ t.toFinset) <| by simp
#align set.fintype_prod Set.fintypeProd
instance fintypeOffDiag [DecidableEq α] (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype s.offDiag :=
Fintype.ofFinset s.toFinset.offDiag <| by simp
#align set.fintype_off_diag Set.fintypeOffDiag
/-- `image2 f s t` is `Fintype` if `s` and `t` are. -/
instance fintypeImage2 [DecidableEq γ] (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [hs : Fintype s]
[ht : Fintype t] : Fintype (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
apply Set.fintypeImage
#align set.fintype_image2 Set.fintypeImage2
instance fintypeSeq [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f] [Fintype s] :
Fintype (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
apply Set.fintypeBiUnion'
#align set.fintype_seq Set.fintypeSeq
instance fintypeSeq' {α β : Type u} [DecidableEq β] (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Fintype f]
[Fintype s] : Fintype (f <*> s) :=
Set.fintypeSeq f s
#align set.fintype_seq' Set.fintypeSeq'
instance fintypeMemFinset (s : Finset α) : Fintype { a | a ∈ s } :=
Finset.fintypeCoeSort s
#align set.fintype_mem_finset Set.fintypeMemFinset
end FintypeInstances
end Set
theorem Equiv.set_finite_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hst : s ≃ t) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
simp_rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, hst.finite_iff]
#align equiv.set_finite_iff Equiv.set_finite_iff
/-! ### Finset -/
namespace Finset
/-- Gives a `Set.Finite` for the `Finset` coerced to a `Set`.
This is a wrapper around `Set.toFinite`. -/
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align finset.finite_to_set Finset.finite_toSet
-- Porting note (#10618): was @[simp], now `simp` can prove it
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset (s : Finset α) : s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s := by
rw [toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_coe]
#align finset.finite_to_set_to_finset Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Finset
namespace Multiset
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet (s : Multiset α) : { x | x ∈ s }.Finite := by
classical simpa only [← Multiset.mem_toFinset] using s.toFinset.finite_toSet
#align multiset.finite_to_set Multiset.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem finite_toSet_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) :
s.finite_toSet.toFinset = s.toFinset := by
ext x
simp
#align multiset.finite_to_set_to_finset Multiset.finite_toSet_toFinset
end Multiset
@[simp]
theorem List.finite_toSet (l : List α) : { x | x ∈ l }.Finite :=
(show Multiset α from ⟦l⟧).finite_toSet
#align list.finite_to_set List.finite_toSet
/-! ### Finite instances
There is seemingly some overlap between the following instances and the `Fintype` instances
in `Data.Set.Finite`. While every `Fintype` instance gives a `Finite` instance, those
instances that depend on `Fintype` or `Decidable` instances need an additional `Finite` instance
to be able to generally apply.
Some set instances do not appear here since they are consequences of others, for example
`Subtype.Finite` for subsets of a finite type.
-/
namespace Finite.Set
open scoped Classical
example {s : Set α} [Finite α] : Finite s :=
inferInstance
example : Finite (∅ : Set α) :=
inferInstance
example (a : α) : Finite ({a} : Set α) :=
inferInstance
instance finite_union (s t : Set α) [Finite s] [Finite t] : Finite (s ∪ t : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
cases nonempty_fintype t
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_union Finite.Set.finite_union
instance finite_sep (s : Set α) (p : α → Prop) [Finite s] : Finite ({ a ∈ s | p a } : Set α) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_sep Finite.Set.finite_sep
protected theorem subset (s : Set α) {t : Set α} [Finite s] (h : t ⊆ s) : Finite t := by
rw [← sep_eq_of_subset h]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.subset Finite.Set.subset
instance finite_inter_of_right (s t : Set α) [Finite t] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset t inter_subset_right
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_right Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_right
instance finite_inter_of_left (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s ∩ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s inter_subset_left
#align finite.set.finite_inter_of_left Finite.Set.finite_inter_of_left
instance finite_diff (s t : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (s \ t : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.subset s diff_subset
#align finite.set.finite_diff Finite.Set.finite_diff
instance finite_range (f : ι → α) [Finite ι] : Finite (range f) := by
haveI := Fintype.ofFinite (PLift ι)
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_range Finite.Set.finite_range
instance finite_iUnion [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (f i)] : Finite (⋃ i, f i) := by
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply Set.finite_range
#align finite.set.finite_Union Finite.Set.finite_iUnion
instance finite_sUnion {s : Set (Set α)} [Finite s] [H : ∀ t : s, Finite (t : Set α)] :
Finite (⋃₀ s) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact @Finite.Set.finite_iUnion _ _ _ _ H
#align finite.set.finite_sUnion Finite.Set.finite_sUnion
theorem finite_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α)
(H : ∀ i ∈ s, Finite (t i)) : Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
haveI : ∀ i : s, Finite (t i) := fun i => H i i.property
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion Finite.Set.finite_biUnion
instance finite_biUnion' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) [Finite s] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋃ x ∈ s, t x) :=
finite_biUnion s t fun _ _ => inferInstance
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion'
/-- Example: `Finite (⋃ (i < n), f i)` where `f : ℕ → Set α` and `[∀ i, Finite (f i)]`
(when given instances from `Order.Interval.Finset.Nat`).
-/
instance finite_biUnion'' {ι : Type*} (p : ι → Prop) [h : Finite { x | p x }] (t : ι → Set α)
[∀ i, Finite (t i)] : Finite (⋃ (x) (_ : p x), t x) :=
@Finite.Set.finite_biUnion' _ _ (setOf p) h t _
#align finite.set.finite_bUnion'' Finite.Set.finite_biUnion''
instance finite_iInter {ι : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set α) [∀ i, Finite (t i)] :
Finite (⋂ i, t i) :=
Finite.Set.subset (t <| Classical.arbitrary ι) (iInter_subset _ _)
#align finite.set.finite_Inter Finite.Set.finite_iInter
instance finite_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) [Finite s] : Finite (insert a s : Set α) :=
Finite.Set.finite_union {a} s
#align finite.set.finite_insert Finite.Set.finite_insert
instance finite_image (s : Set α) (f : α → β) [Finite s] : Finite (f '' s) := by
cases nonempty_fintype s
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image Finite.Set.finite_image
instance finite_replacement [Finite α] (f : α → β) :
Finite {f x | x : α} :=
Finite.Set.finite_range f
#align finite.set.finite_replacement Finite.Set.finite_replacement
instance finite_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (s ×ˢ t : Set (α × β)) :=
Finite.of_equiv _ (Equiv.Set.prod s t).symm
#align finite.set.finite_prod Finite.Set.finite_prod
instance finite_image2 (f : α → β → γ) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) [Finite s] [Finite t] :
Finite (image2 f s t : Set γ) := by
rw [← image_prod]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_image2 Finite.Set.finite_image2
instance finite_seq (f : Set (α → β)) (s : Set α) [Finite f] [Finite s] : Finite (f.seq s) := by
rw [seq_def]
infer_instance
#align finite.set.finite_seq Finite.Set.finite_seq
end Finite.Set
namespace Set
/-! ### Constructors for `Set.Finite`
Every constructor here should have a corresponding `Fintype` instance in the previous section
(or in the `Fintype` module).
The implementation of these constructors ideally should be no more than `Set.toFinite`,
after possibly setting up some `Fintype` and classical `Decidable` instances.
-/
section SetFiniteConstructors
@[nontriviality]
theorem Finite.of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] (s : Set α) : s.Finite :=
s.toFinite
#align set.finite.of_subsingleton Set.Finite.of_subsingleton
theorem finite_univ [Finite α] : (@univ α).Finite :=
Set.toFinite _
#align set.finite_univ Set.finite_univ
theorem finite_univ_iff : (@univ α).Finite ↔ Finite α := (Equiv.Set.univ α).finite_iff
#align set.finite_univ_iff Set.finite_univ_iff
alias ⟨_root_.Finite.of_finite_univ, _⟩ := finite_univ_iff
#align finite.of_finite_univ Finite.of_finite_univ
theorem Finite.subset {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {t : Set α} (ht : t ⊆ s) : t.Finite := by
have := hs.to_subtype
exact Finite.Set.subset _ ht
#align set.finite.subset Set.Finite.subset
theorem Finite.union {s t : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : (s ∪ t).Finite := by
rw [Set.Finite] at hs ht
apply toFinite
#align set.finite.union Set.Finite.union
theorem Finite.finite_of_compl {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (hsc : sᶜ.Finite) : Finite α := by
rw [← finite_univ_iff, ← union_compl_self s]
exact hs.union hsc
#align set.finite.finite_of_compl Set.Finite.finite_of_compl
theorem Finite.sup {s t : Set α} : s.Finite → t.Finite → (s ⊔ t).Finite :=
Finite.union
#align set.finite.sup Set.Finite.sup
theorem Finite.sep {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (p : α → Prop) : { a ∈ s | p a }.Finite :=
hs.subset <| sep_subset _ _
#align set.finite.sep Set.Finite.sep
theorem Finite.inter_of_left {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ∩ t).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_left
#align set.finite.inter_of_left Set.Finite.inter_of_left
theorem Finite.inter_of_right {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ∩ s).Finite :=
hs.subset inter_subset_right
#align set.finite.inter_of_right Set.Finite.inter_of_right
theorem Finite.inf_of_left {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s ⊓ t).Finite :=
h.inter_of_left t
#align set.finite.inf_of_left Set.Finite.inf_of_left
theorem Finite.inf_of_right {s : Set α} (h : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (t ⊓ s).Finite :=
h.inter_of_right t
#align set.finite.inf_of_right Set.Finite.inf_of_right
protected lemma Infinite.mono {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s.Infinite → t.Infinite :=
mt fun ht ↦ ht.subset h
#align set.infinite.mono Set.Infinite.mono
theorem Finite.diff {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) (t : Set α) : (s \ t).Finite :=
hs.subset diff_subset
#align set.finite.diff Set.Finite.diff
theorem Finite.of_diff {s t : Set α} (hd : (s \ t).Finite) (ht : t.Finite) : s.Finite :=
(hd.union ht).subset <| subset_diff_union _ _
#align set.finite.of_diff Set.Finite.of_diff
theorem finite_iUnion [Finite ι] {f : ι → Set α} (H : ∀ i, (f i).Finite) : (⋃ i, f i).Finite :=
haveI := fun i => (H i).to_subtype
toFinite _
#align set.finite_Union Set.finite_iUnion
/-- Dependent version of `Finite.biUnion`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Finite.lean | 794 | 798 | theorem Finite.biUnion' {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) {t : ∀ i ∈ s, Set α}
(ht : ∀ i (hi : i ∈ s), (t i hi).Finite) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i ‹_›).Finite := by |
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply finite_iUnion fun i : s => ht i.1 i.2
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.LocalRing
#align_import data.polynomial.expand from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# Expand a polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.expand R p f`: expand the polynomial `f` with coefficients in a
commutative semiring `R` by a factor of p, so `expand R p (∑ aₙ xⁿ)` is `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
* `Polynomial.contract p f`: the opposite of `expand`, so it sends `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ` to `∑ aₙ xⁿ`.
-/
universe u v w
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
section CommSemiring
variable (R : Type u) [CommSemiring R] {S : Type v} [CommSemiring S] (p q : ℕ)
/-- Expand the polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`. -/
noncomputable def expand : R[X] →ₐ[R] R[X] :=
{ (eval₂RingHom C (X ^ p) : R[X] →+* R[X]) with commutes' := fun _ => eval₂_C _ _ }
#align polynomial.expand Polynomial.expand
theorem coe_expand : (expand R p : R[X] → R[X]) = eval₂ C (X ^ p) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.coe_expand Polynomial.coe_expand
variable {R}
theorem expand_eq_comp_X_pow {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.comp (X ^ p) := rfl
theorem expand_eq_sum {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = f.sum fun e a => C a * (X ^ p) ^ e := by
simp [expand, eval₂]
#align polynomial.expand_eq_sum Polynomial.expand_eq_sum
@[simp]
theorem expand_C (r : R) : expand R p (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_C Polynomial.expand_C
@[simp]
theorem expand_X : expand R p X = X ^ p :=
eval₂_X _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_X Polynomial.expand_X
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (r : R) : expand R p (monomial q r) = monomial (q * p) r := by
simp_rw [← smul_X_eq_monomial, AlgHom.map_smul, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, mul_comm, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_monomial Polynomial.expand_monomial
theorem expand_expand (f : R[X]) : expand R p (expand R q f) = expand R (p * q) f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by simp_rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by simp_rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
simp_rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_mul]
#align polynomial.expand_expand Polynomial.expand_expand
theorem expand_mul (f : R[X]) : expand R (p * q) f = expand R p (expand R q f) :=
(expand_expand p q f).symm
#align polynomial.expand_mul Polynomial.expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem expand_zero (f : R[X]) : expand R 0 f = C (eval 1 f) := by simp [expand]
#align polynomial.expand_zero Polynomial.expand_zero
@[simp]
theorem expand_one (f : R[X]) : expand R 1 f = f :=
Polynomial.induction_on f (fun r => by rw [expand_C])
(fun f g ihf ihg => by rw [AlgHom.map_add, ihf, ihg]) fun n r _ => by
rw [AlgHom.map_mul, expand_C, AlgHom.map_pow, expand_X, pow_one]
#align polynomial.expand_one Polynomial.expand_one
theorem expand_pow (f : R[X]) : expand R (p ^ q) f = (expand R p)^[q] f :=
Nat.recOn q (by rw [pow_zero, expand_one, Function.iterate_zero, id]) fun n ih => by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', pow_succ', expand_mul, ih]
#align polynomial.expand_pow Polynomial.expand_pow
theorem derivative_expand (f : R[X]) : Polynomial.derivative (expand R p f) =
expand R p (Polynomial.derivative f) * (p * (X ^ (p - 1) : R[X])) := by
rw [coe_expand, derivative_eval₂_C, derivative_pow, C_eq_natCast, derivative_X, mul_one]
#align polynomial.derivative_expand Polynomial.derivative_expand
theorem coeff_expand {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff n = if p ∣ n then f.coeff (n / p) else 0 := by
simp only [expand_eq_sum]
simp_rw [coeff_sum, ← pow_mul, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, coeff_monomial, sum]
split_ifs with h
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (n / p), Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, if_pos rfl]
· intro b _ hb2
rw [if_neg]
intro hb3
apply hb2
rw [← hb3, Nat.mul_div_cancel_left b hp]
· intro hn
rw [not_mem_support_iff.1 hn]
split_ifs <;> rfl
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro k _
rw [if_neg]
exact fun hkn => h ⟨k, hkn.symm⟩
#align polynomial.coeff_expand Polynomial.coeff_expand
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (n * p) = f.coeff n := by
rw [coeff_expand hp, if_pos (dvd_mul_left _ _), Nat.mul_div_cancel _ hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul
@[simp]
theorem coeff_expand_mul' {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
(expand R p f).coeff (p * n) = f.coeff n := by rw [mul_comm, coeff_expand_mul hp]
#align polynomial.coeff_expand_mul' Polynomial.coeff_expand_mul'
/-- Expansion is injective. -/
theorem expand_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) : Function.Injective (expand R n) := fun g g' H =>
ext fun k => by rw [← coeff_expand_mul hn, H, coeff_expand_mul hn]
#align polynomial.expand_injective Polynomial.expand_injective
theorem expand_inj {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f g : R[X]} : expand R p f = expand R p g ↔ f = g :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff
#align polynomial.expand_inj Polynomial.expand_inj
theorem expand_eq_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(expand_injective hp).eq_iff' (map_zero _)
#align polynomial.expand_eq_zero Polynomial.expand_eq_zero
theorem expand_ne_zero {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} : expand R p f ≠ 0 ↔ f ≠ 0 :=
(expand_eq_zero hp).not
#align polynomial.expand_ne_zero Polynomial.expand_ne_zero
theorem expand_eq_C {p : ℕ} (hp : 0 < p) {f : R[X]} {r : R} : expand R p f = C r ↔ f = C r := by
rw [← expand_C, expand_inj hp, expand_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.expand_eq_C Polynomial.expand_eq_C
theorem natDegree_expand (p : ℕ) (f : R[X]) : (expand R p f).natDegree = f.natDegree * p := by
rcases p.eq_zero_or_pos with hp | hp
· rw [hp, coe_expand, pow_zero, mul_zero, ← C_1, eval₂_hom, natDegree_C]
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, AlgHom.map_zero, natDegree_zero, zero_mul]
have hf1 : expand R p f ≠ 0 := mt (expand_eq_zero hp).1 hf
rw [← WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
convert (degree_eq_natDegree hf1).symm -- Porting note: was `rw [degree_eq_natDegree hf1]`
symm
refine le_antisymm ((degree_le_iff_coeff_zero _ _).2 fun n hn => ?_) ?_
· rw [coeff_expand hp]
split_ifs with hpn
· rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt]
contrapose! hn
erw [WithBot.coe_le_coe, ← Nat.div_mul_cancel hpn]
exact Nat.mul_le_mul_right p hn
· rfl
· refine le_degree_of_ne_zero ?_
erw [coeff_expand_mul hp, ← leadingCoeff]
exact mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 hf
#align polynomial.nat_degree_expand Polynomial.natDegree_expand
theorem leadingCoeff_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) :
(expand R p f).leadingCoeff = f.leadingCoeff := by
simp_rw [leadingCoeff, natDegree_expand, coeff_expand_mul hp]
theorem monic_expand_iff {p : ℕ} {f : R[X]} (hp : 0 < p) : (expand R p f).Monic ↔ f.Monic := by
simp only [Monic, leadingCoeff_expand hp]
alias ⟨_, Monic.expand⟩ := monic_expand_iff
#align polynomial.monic.expand Polynomial.Monic.expand
theorem map_expand {p : ℕ} {f : R →+* S} {q : R[X]} :
map f (expand R p q) = expand S p (map f q) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
ext
rw [coeff_map, coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp), coeff_expand (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp)]
split_ifs <;> simp_all
#align polynomial.map_expand Polynomial.map_expand
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Expand.lean | 195 | 197 | theorem expand_eval (p : ℕ) (P : R[X]) (r : R) : eval r (expand R p P) = eval (r ^ p) P := by |
refine Polynomial.induction_on P (fun a => by simp) (fun f g hf hg => ?_) fun n a _ => by simp
rw [AlgHom.map_add, eval_add, eval_add, hf, hg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `PSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `Set ZFSet`.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `PSet.Type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `PSet.omega`, `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `PSet`, as a `Set`.
* `PSet.Arity.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`PSet.Equiv`.
* `PSet.Resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `PSet.eval`: Turns a `PSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`ZFSet`-valued function.
* `Classical.allDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `ZFSet.mapDefinableAux` computably.
-/
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family. -/
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `Set` of pre-sets. -/
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [PSet.Nonempty]
#align pSet.not_nonempty_empty PSet.not_nonempty_empty
protected theorem equiv_empty (x : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] : Equiv x ∅ :=
PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty x _
#align pSet.equiv_empty PSet.equiv_empty
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert (x y : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Option y.Type, fun o => Option.casesOn o x y.Func⟩
#align pSet.insert PSet.insert
instance : Insert PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.insert⟩
instance : Singleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun s => insert s ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
instance (x y : PSet) : Inhabited (insert x y).Type :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited <| Option y.Type)
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def ofNat : ℕ → PSet
| 0 => ∅
| n + 1 => insert (ofNat n) (ofNat n)
#align pSet.of_nat PSet.ofNat
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : PSet :=
⟨ULift ℕ, fun n => ofNat n.down⟩
#align pSet.omega PSet.omega
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : PSet → Prop) (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨{ a // p (x.Func a) }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩
#align pSet.sep PSet.sep
instance : Sep PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Set x.Type, fun p => ⟨{ a // p a }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩⟩
#align pSet.powerset PSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset : ∀ {x y : PSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => (Subset.congr_left e).2 fun ⟨a, _⟩ => ⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩, fun βα =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, Equiv (B b) (A a) }, fun b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
fun ⟨_, b, ba⟩ => ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_powerset PSet.mem_powerset
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def sUnion (a : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Σx, (a.Func x).Type, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (a.Func x).Func y⟩
#align pSet.sUnion PSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩, y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : Equiv y ((A a).Func c))⟩ =>
have : Func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).Type (A a).Func := Mem.mk (A a).Func c
⟨_, Mem.mk _ _, (Mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa [eta] at this)⟩,
fun ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : Equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩ => by
rw [← eta (A a)] at e
exact
let ⟨βt, _⟩ := e
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b
⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_sUnion PSet.mem_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : PSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align pSet.to_set_sUnion PSet.toSet_sUnion
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (x : PSet.{u}) : PSet :=
⟨x.Type, f ∘ x.Func⟩
#align pSet.image PSet.image
-- Porting note: H arguments made explicit.
theorem mem_image {f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}} (H : ∀ x y, Equiv x y → Equiv (f x) (f y)) :
∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, Equiv y (f z)
| ⟨_, A⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨A a, Mem.mk A a, ya⟩, fun ⟨_, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩ => ⟨a, yz.trans <| H _ _ za⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_image PSet.mem_image
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def Lift : PSet.{u} → PSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ => ⟨ULift.{v, u} α, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift (A x)⟩
#align pSet.lift PSet.Lift
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
def embed : PSet.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨ULift.{v, u + 1} PSet, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x⟩
#align pSet.embed PSet.embed
theorem lift_mem_embed : ∀ x : PSet.{u}, PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x ∈ embed.{u, v} := fun x =>
⟨⟨x⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align pSet.lift_mem_embed PSet.lift_mem_embed
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def Arity.Equiv : ∀ {n}, OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0, a, b => PSet.Equiv a b
| _ + 1, a, b => ∀ x y : PSet, PSet.Equiv x y → Arity.Equiv (a x) (b y)
#align pSet.arity.equiv PSet.Arity.Equiv
theorem Arity.equiv_const {a : PSet.{u}} :
∀ n, Arity.Equiv (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n) (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n)
| 0 => Equiv.rfl
| _ + 1 => fun _ _ _ => Arity.equiv_const _
#align pSet.arity.equiv_const PSet.Arity.equiv_const
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `PSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def Resp (n) :=
{ x : OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n // Arity.Equiv x x }
#align pSet.resp PSet.Resp
instance Resp.inhabited {n} : Inhabited (Resp n) :=
⟨⟨OfArity.const _ default _, Arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
#align pSet.resp.inhabited PSet.Resp.inhabited
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def Resp.f {n} (f : Resp (n + 1)) (x : PSet) : Resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.resp.f PSet.Resp.f
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `PSet.Arity.Equiv`. -/
def Resp.Equiv {n} (a b : Resp n) : Prop :=
Arity.Equiv a.1 b.1
#align pSet.resp.equiv PSet.Resp.Equiv
@[refl]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.refl {n} (a : Resp n) : Resp.Equiv a a :=
a.2
#align pSet.resp.equiv.refl PSet.Resp.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.euc :
∀ {n} {a b c : Resp n}, Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv c b → Resp.Equiv a c
| 0, _, _, _, hab, hcb => PSet.Equiv.euc hab hcb
| n + 1, a, b, c, hab, hcb => fun x y h =>
@Resp.Equiv.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ <| PSet.Equiv.refl y)
#align pSet.resp.equiv.euc PSet.Resp.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.symm {n} {a b : Resp n} : Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv b a :=
(Resp.Equiv.refl b).euc
#align pSet.resp.equiv.symm PSet.Resp.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.trans {n} {x y z : Resp n} (h1 : Resp.Equiv x y)
(h2 : Resp.Equiv y z) : Resp.Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.resp.equiv.trans PSet.Resp.Equiv.trans
instance Resp.setoid {n} : Setoid (Resp n) :=
⟨Resp.Equiv, Resp.Equiv.refl, Resp.Equiv.symm, Resp.Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.resp.setoid PSet.Resp.setoid
end PSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
#align Set ZFSet
namespace PSet
namespace Resp
/-- Helper function for `PSet.eval`. -/
def evalAux :
∀ {n},
{ f : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n // ∀ a b : Resp n, Resp.Equiv a b → f a = f b }
| 0 => ⟨fun a => ⟦a.1⟧, fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound h⟩
| n + 1 =>
let F : Resp (n + 1) → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1) := fun a =>
@Quotient.lift _ _ PSet.setoid (fun x => evalAux.1 (a.f x)) fun _ _ h =>
evalAux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)
⟨F, fun b c h =>
funext <|
(@Quotient.ind _ _ fun q => F b q = F c q) fun z =>
evalAux.2 (Resp.f b z) (Resp.f c z) (h _ _ (PSet.Equiv.refl z))⟩
#align pSet.resp.eval_aux PSet.Resp.evalAux
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n :=
evalAux.1
#align pSet.resp.eval PSet.Resp.eval
theorem eval_val {n f x} :
(@eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align pSet.resp.eval_val PSet.Resp.eval_val
end Resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive Definable (n) : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n → Type (u + 1)
| mk (f) : Definable n (Resp.eval n f)
#align pSet.definable PSet.Definable
attribute [instance] Definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def Definable.EqMk {n} (f) :
∀ {s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n} (_ : Resp.eval _ f = s), Definable n s
| _, rfl => ⟨f⟩
#align pSet.definable.eq_mk PSet.Definable.EqMk
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def Definable.Resp {n} : ∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [Definable n s], Resp n
| _, ⟨f⟩ => f
#align pSet.definable.resp PSet.Definable.Resp
theorem Definable.eq {n} :
∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [H : Definable n s], (@Definable.Resp n s H).eval _ = s
| _, ⟨_⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.definable.eq PSet.Definable.eq
end PSet
namespace Classical
open PSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allDefinable : ∀ {n} (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n), Definable n F
| 0, F =>
let p := @Quotient.exists_rep PSet _ F
@Definable.EqMk 0 ⟨choose p, Equiv.rfl⟩ _ (choose_spec p)
| n + 1, (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1)) => by
have I : (x : ZFSet) → Definable n (F x) := fun x => allDefinable (F x)
refine @Definable.EqMk (n + 1) ⟨fun x : PSet => (@Definable.Resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, ?_⟩ _ ?_
· dsimp [Arity.Equiv]
intro x y h
rw [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]
exact (Definable.Resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2
refine funext fun q => Quotient.inductionOn q fun x => ?_
simp_rw [Resp.eval_val, Resp.f]
exact @Definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧)
#align classical.all_definable Classical.allDefinable
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
#align Set.mk ZFSet.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
#align Set.mk_eq ZFSet.mk_eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
#align Set.mk_out ZFSet.mk_out
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align Set.eq ZFSet.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
#align Set.sound ZFSet.sound
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
#align Set.exact ZFSet.exact
@[simp]
theorem eval_mk {n f x} :
(@Resp.eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) (mk x) = Resp.eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align Set.eval_mk ZFSet.eval_mk
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PSet.Mem fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
#align Set.mem ZFSet.Mem
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mk_mem_iff ZFSet.mk_mem_iff
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align Set.to_set ZFSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mem_to_set ZFSet.mem_toSet
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
cases' hb with i h
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
#align Set.small_to_set ZFSet.small_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align Set.nonempty ZFSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_def ZFSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_of_mem ZFSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_to_set_iff ZFSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
#align Set.subset ZFSet.Subset
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
#align Set.has_subset ZFSet.hasSubset
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.subset_def ZFSet.subset_def
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
#align Set.subset_iff ZFSet.subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
#align Set.to_set_subset_iff ZFSet.toSet_subset_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
#align Set.ext ZFSet.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], ext⟩
#align Set.ext_iff ZFSet.ext_iff
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
#align Set.to_set_injective ZFSet.toSet_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.to_set_inj ZFSet.toSet_inj
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
#align Set.empty ZFSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
#align Set.not_mem_empty ZFSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align Set.to_set_empty ZFSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
#align Set.empty_subset ZFSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
#align Set.not_nonempty_empty ZFSet.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_mk_iff ZFSet.nonempty_mk_iff
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp
#align Set.eq_empty ZFSet.eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
#align Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 2
⟨PSet.insert, fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.insert ZFSet.Insert
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun x y ⟨α, A⟩ =>
show (x ∈ PSet.mk (Option α) fun o => Option.rec y A o) ↔ mk x = mk y ∨ x ∈ PSet.mk α A from
⟨fun m =>
match m with
| ⟨some a, ha⟩ => Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
| ⟨none, h⟩ => Or.inl (Quotient.sound h),
fun m =>
match m with
| Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨some a, ha⟩
| Or.inl h => ⟨none, Quotient.exact h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_insert_iff ZFSet.mem_insert_iff
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
#align Set.mem_insert ZFSet.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
#align Set.mem_insert_of_mem ZFSet.mem_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_insert ZFSet.toSet_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.trans mem_insert_iff
⟨fun o => Or.rec (fun h => h) (fun n => absurd n (not_mem_empty _)) o, Or.inl⟩
#align Set.mem_singleton ZFSet.mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_singleton ZFSet.toSet_singleton
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
#align Set.insert_nonempty ZFSet.insert_nonempty
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
#align Set.singleton_nonempty ZFSet.singleton_nonempty
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
#align Set.mem_pair ZFSet.mem_pair
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
#align Set.omega ZFSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_zero ZFSet.omega_zero
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_succ ZFSet.omega_succ
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y), fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sep ZFSet.sep
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a, h⟩, by rwa [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩, pa⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, by
rw [mk_func] at h
rwa [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound h]⟩,
h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_sep ZFSet.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sep ZFSet.toSet_sep
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.powerset, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.powerset ZFSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ =>
show (⟨β, B⟩ : PSet.{u}) ∈ PSet.powerset.{u} ⟨α, A⟩ ↔ _ by simp [mem_powerset, subset_iff]
#align Set.mem_powerset ZFSet.mem_powerset
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
cases' hb with γδ δγ
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
#align Set.sUnion_lem ZFSet.sUnion_lem
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sUnion, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sUnion ZFSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
special-case `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
noncomputable def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := by
classical exact if h : x.Nonempty then ZFSet.sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z) h.some else ∅
#align Set.sInter ZFSet.sInter
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Iff.trans PSet.mem_sUnion
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion ZFSet.mem_sUnion
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
rw [sInter, dif_pos h]
simp only [mem_toSet, mem_sep, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun H => H _ h.some_mem
#align Set.mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align Set.sUnion_empty ZFSet.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := dif_neg <| by simp
#align Set.sInter_empty ZFSet.sInter_empty
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
#align Set.mem_of_mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_of_mem_sInter
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem ZFSet.mem_sUnion_of_mem
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
#align Set.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem ZFSet.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
#align Set.sUnion_singleton ZFSet.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align Set.sInter_singleton ZFSet.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sUnion ZFSet.toSet_sUnion
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
#align Set.to_set_sInter ZFSet.toSet_sInter
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
#align Set.singleton_injective ZFSet.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.singleton_inj ZFSet.singleton_inj
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
#align Set.union ZFSet.union
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
#align Set.inter ZFSet.inter
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
#align Set.diff ZFSet.diff
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
#align Set.to_set_union ZFSet.toSet_union
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_inter ZFSet.toSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sdiff ZFSet.toSet_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
#align Set.mem_union ZFSet.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
#align Set.mem_inter ZFSet.mem_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
#align Set.mem_diff ZFSet.mem_diff
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
#align Set.sUnion_pair ZFSet.sUnion_pair
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
#align Set.mem_wf ZFSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
#align Set.induction_on ZFSet.inductionOn
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
-- Porting note: this can't be inferred automatically for some reason.
instance : IsIrrefl ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align Set.mem_asymm ZFSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align Set.mem_irrefl ZFSet.mem_irrefl
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
#align Set.regularity ZFSet.regularity
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := @Definable.Resp 1 f _
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.image r, fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image hr).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image hr).symm⟩
#align Set.image ZFSet.image
theorem image.mk :
∀ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [H : Definable 1 f] (x) {y} (_ : y ∈ x), f y ∈ @image f H x
| _, ⟨F⟩, x, y => Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨a, F.2 _ _ ya⟩
#align Set.image.mk ZFSet.image.mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_image :
∀ {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [H : Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}},
y ∈ @image f H x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y
| _, ⟨_⟩, x, y =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ya⟩, fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ =>
e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
#align Set.mem_image ZFSet.mem_image
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [H : Definable 1 f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_image ZFSet.toSet_image
/-- The range of an indexed family of sets. The universes allow for a more general index type
without manual use of `ULift`. -/
noncomputable def range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) : ZFSet.{max u v} :=
⟦⟨ULift.{v} α, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ ULift.down⟩⟧
#align Set.range ZFSet.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α : Type u} {f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}} {x : ZFSet.{max u v}} :
x ∈ range.{u, v} f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨z.down, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use ULift.up z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
#align Set.mem_range ZFSet.mem_range
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) :
(range.{u, v} f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_range ZFSet.toSet_range
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
#align Set.pair ZFSet.pair
@[simp]
theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by simp [pair]
#align Set.to_set_pair ZFSet.toSet_pair
/-- A subset of pairs `{(a, b) ∈ x × y | p a b}` -/
def pairSep (p : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → Prop) (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b) (powerset (powerset (x ∪ y)))
#align Set.pair_sep ZFSet.pairSep
@[simp]
theorem mem_pairSep {p} {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} :
z ∈ pairSep p x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b ∧ p a b := by
refine mem_sep.trans ⟨And.right, fun e => ⟨?_, e⟩⟩
rcases e with ⟨a, ax, b, bY, rfl, pab⟩
simp only [mem_powerset, subset_def, mem_union, pair, mem_pair]
rintro u (rfl | rfl) v <;> simp only [mem_singleton, mem_pair]
· rintro rfl
exact Or.inl ax
· rintro (rfl | rfl) <;> [left; right] <;> assumption
#align Set.mem_pair_sep ZFSet.mem_pairSep
theorem pair_injective : Function.Injective2 pair := fun x x' y y' H => by
have ae := ext_iff.1 H
simp only [pair, mem_pair] at ae
obtain rfl : x = x' := by
cases' (ae {x}).1 (by simp) with h h
· exact singleton_injective h
· have m : x' ∈ ({x} : ZFSet) := by simp [h]
rw [mem_singleton.mp m]
have he : x = y → y = y' := by
rintro rfl
cases' (ae {x, y'}).2 (by simp only [eq_self_iff_true, or_true_iff]) with xy'x xy'xx
· rw [eq_comm, ← mem_singleton, ← xy'x, mem_pair]
exact Or.inr rfl
· simpa [eq_comm] using (ext_iff.1 xy'xx y').1 (by simp)
obtain xyx | xyy' := (ae {x, y}).1 (by simp)
· obtain rfl := mem_singleton.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyx y).1 <| by simp)
simp [he rfl]
· obtain rfl | yy' := mem_pair.mp ((ext_iff.1 xyy' y).1 <| by simp)
· simp [he rfl]
· simp [yy']
#align Set.pair_injective ZFSet.pair_injective
@[simp]
theorem pair_inj {x y x' y' : ZFSet} : pair x y = pair x' y' ↔ x = x' ∧ y = y' :=
pair_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.pair_inj ZFSet.pair_inj
/-- The cartesian product, `{(a, b) | a ∈ x, b ∈ y}` -/
def prod : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u} :=
pairSep fun _ _ => True
#align Set.prod ZFSet.prod
@[simp]
theorem mem_prod {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ prod x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ x, ∃ b ∈ y, z = pair a b := by
simp [prod]
#align Set.mem_prod ZFSet.mem_prod
theorem pair_mem_prod {x y a b : ZFSet.{u}} : pair a b ∈ prod x y ↔ a ∈ x ∧ b ∈ y := by
simp
#align Set.pair_mem_prod ZFSet.pair_mem_prod
/-- `isFunc x y f` is the assertion that `f` is a subset of `x × y` which relates to each element
of `x` a unique element of `y`, so that we can consider `f` as a ZFC function `x → y`. -/
def IsFunc (x y f : ZFSet.{u}) : Prop :=
f ⊆ prod x y ∧ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x → ∃! w, pair z w ∈ f
#align Set.is_func ZFSet.IsFunc
/-- `funs x y` is `y ^ x`, the set of all set functions `x → y` -/
def funs (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (IsFunc x y) (powerset (prod x y))
#align Set.funs ZFSet.funs
@[simp]
theorem mem_funs {x y f : ZFSet.{u}} : f ∈ funs x y ↔ IsFunc x y f := by simp [funs, IsFunc]
#align Set.mem_funs ZFSet.mem_funs
-- TODO(Mario): Prove this computably
/- Porting note: the `Definable` argument in `mapDefinableAux` is unused, though the TODO remark
suggests it shouldn't be. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
noncomputable instance mapDefinableAux (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] :
Definable 1 fun (y : ZFSet) => pair y (f y) :=
@Classical.allDefinable 1 _
#align Set.map_definable_aux ZFSet.mapDefinableAux
/-- Graph of a function: `map f x` is the ZFC function which maps `a ∈ x` to `f a` -/
noncomputable def map (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
image fun y => pair y (f y)
#align Set.map ZFSet.map
@[simp]
theorem mem_map {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet} :
y ∈ map f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, pair z (f z) = y :=
mem_image
#align Set.mem_map ZFSet.mem_map
theorem map_unique {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [H : Definable 1 f] {x z : ZFSet.{u}}
(zx : z ∈ x) : ∃! w, pair z w ∈ map f x :=
⟨f z, image.mk _ _ zx, fun y yx => by
let ⟨w, _, we⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
let ⟨wz, fy⟩ := pair_injective we
rw [← fy, wz]⟩
#align Set.map_unique ZFSet.map_unique
@[simp]
theorem map_isFunc {f : ZFSet → ZFSet} [Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet} :
IsFunc x y (map f x) ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, f z ∈ y :=
⟨fun ⟨ss, h⟩ z zx =>
let ⟨_, t1, t2⟩ := h z zx
(t2 (f z) (image.mk _ _ zx)).symm ▸ (pair_mem_prod.1 (ss t1)).right,
fun h =>
⟨fun _ yx =>
let ⟨z, zx, ze⟩ := mem_image.1 yx
ze ▸ pair_mem_prod.2 ⟨zx, h z zx⟩,
fun _ => map_unique⟩⟩
#align Set.map_is_func ZFSet.map_isFunc
/-- Given a predicate `p` on ZFC sets. `Hereditarily p x` means that `x` has property `p` and the
members of `x` are all `Hereditarily p`. -/
def Hereditarily (p : ZFSet → Prop) (x : ZFSet) : Prop :=
p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y
termination_by x
#align Set.hereditarily ZFSet.Hereditarily
section Hereditarily
variable {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}}
theorem hereditarily_iff : Hereditarily p x ↔ p x ∧ ∀ y ∈ x, Hereditarily p y := by
rw [← Hereditarily]
#align Set.hereditarily_iff ZFSet.hereditarily_iff
alias ⟨Hereditarily.def, _⟩ := hereditarily_iff
#align Set.hereditarily.def ZFSet.Hereditarily.def
theorem Hereditarily.self (h : x.Hereditarily p) : p x :=
h.def.1
#align Set.hereditarily.self ZFSet.Hereditarily.self
theorem Hereditarily.mem (h : x.Hereditarily p) (hy : y ∈ x) : y.Hereditarily p :=
h.def.2 _ hy
#align Set.hereditarily.mem ZFSet.Hereditarily.mem
theorem Hereditarily.empty : Hereditarily p x → p ∅ := by
apply @ZFSet.inductionOn _ x
intro y IH h
rcases ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty y with (rfl | ⟨a, ha⟩)
· exact h.self
· exact IH a ha (h.mem ha)
#align Set.hereditarily.empty ZFSet.Hereditarily.empty
end Hereditarily
end ZFSet
/-- The collection of all classes.
We define `Class` as `Set ZFSet`, as this allows us to get many instances automatically. However, in
practice, we treat it as (the definitionally equal) `ZFSet → Prop`. This means, the preferred way to
state that `x : ZFSet` belongs to `A : Class` is to write `A x`. -/
def Class :=
Set ZFSet deriving HasSubset, EmptyCollection, Nonempty, Union, Inter, HasCompl, SDiff
#align Class Class
instance : Insert ZFSet Class :=
⟨Set.insert⟩
namespace Class
-- Porting note: this is no longer an automatically derived instance.
/-- `{x ∈ A | p x}` is the class of elements in `A` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) (A : Class) : Class :=
{y | A y ∧ p y}
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : Class.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, x z ↔ y z) → x = y :=
Set.ext
#align Class.ext Class.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : Class.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z, x z ↔ y z :=
Set.ext_iff
#align Class.ext_iff Class.ext_iff
/-- Coerce a ZFC set into a class -/
@[coe]
def ofSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Class.{u} :=
{ y | y ∈ x }
#align Class.of_Set Class.ofSet
instance : Coe ZFSet Class :=
⟨ofSet⟩
/-- The universal class -/
def univ : Class :=
Set.univ
#align Class.univ Class.univ
/-- Assert that `A` is a ZFC set satisfying `B` -/
def ToSet (B : Class.{u}) (A : Class.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ x : ZFSet, ↑x = A ∧ B x
#align Class.to_Set Class.ToSet
/-- `A ∈ B` if `A` is a ZFC set which satisfies `B` -/
protected def Mem (A B : Class.{u}) : Prop :=
ToSet.{u} B A
#align Class.mem Class.Mem
instance : Membership Class Class :=
⟨Class.Mem⟩
theorem mem_def (A B : Class.{u}) : A ∈ B ↔ ∃ x : ZFSet, ↑x = A ∧ B x :=
Iff.rfl
#align Class.mem_def Class.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : Class.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : Class.{u}) := fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h
#align Class.not_mem_empty Class.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_empty_hom (x : ZFSet.{u}) : ¬(∅ : Class.{u}) x :=
id
#align Class.not_empty_hom Class.not_empty_hom
@[simp]
theorem mem_univ {A : Class.{u}} : A ∈ univ.{u} ↔ ∃ x : ZFSet.{u}, ↑x = A :=
exists_congr fun _ => and_true_iff _
#align Class.mem_univ Class.mem_univ
@[simp]
theorem mem_univ_hom (x : ZFSet.{u}) : univ.{u} x :=
trivial
#align Class.mem_univ_hom Class.mem_univ_hom
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {A : Class.{u}} : A = univ ↔ ∀ x : ZFSet, A x :=
Set.eq_univ_iff_forall
#align Class.eq_univ_iff_forall Class.eq_univ_iff_forall
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {A : Class.{u}} : (∀ x : ZFSet, A x) → A = univ :=
Set.eq_univ_of_forall
#align Class.eq_univ_of_forall Class.eq_univ_of_forall
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded Class.{u} (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨by
have H : ∀ x : ZFSet.{u}, @Acc Class.{u} (· ∈ ·) ↑x := by
refine fun a => ZFSet.inductionOn a fun x IH => ⟨_, ?_⟩
rintro A ⟨z, rfl, hz⟩
exact IH z hz
refine fun A => ⟨A, ?_⟩
rintro B ⟨x, rfl, _⟩
exact H x⟩
#align Class.mem_wf Class.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation Class :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm Class (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
-- Porting note: this can't be inferred automatically for some reason.
instance : IsIrrefl Class (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : Class} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align Class.mem_asymm Class.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : Class) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align Class.mem_irrefl Class.mem_irrefl
/-- **There is no universal set.**
This is stated as `univ ∉ univ`, meaning that `univ` (the class of all sets) is proper (does not
belong to the class of all sets). -/
theorem univ_not_mem_univ : univ ∉ univ :=
mem_irrefl _
#align Class.univ_not_mem_univ Class.univ_not_mem_univ
/-- Convert a conglomerate (a collection of classes) into a class -/
def congToClass (x : Set Class.{u}) : Class.{u} :=
{ y | ↑y ∈ x }
#align Class.Cong_to_Class Class.congToClass
@[simp]
theorem congToClass_empty : congToClass ∅ = ∅ := by
ext z
simp only [congToClass, not_empty_hom, iff_false_iff]
exact Set.not_mem_empty z
#align Class.Cong_to_Class_empty Class.congToClass_empty
/-- Convert a class into a conglomerate (a collection of classes) -/
def classToCong (x : Class.{u}) : Set Class.{u} :=
{ y | y ∈ x }
#align Class.Class_to_Cong Class.classToCong
@[simp]
theorem classToCong_empty : classToCong ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp [classToCong]
#align Class.Class_to_Cong_empty Class.classToCong_empty
/-- The power class of a class is the class of all subclasses that are ZFC sets -/
def powerset (x : Class) : Class :=
congToClass (Set.powerset x)
#align Class.powerset Class.powerset
/-- The union of a class is the class of all members of ZFC sets in the class -/
def sUnion (x : Class) : Class :=
⋃₀ classToCong x
#align Class.sUnion Class.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => Class.sUnion
/-- The intersection of a class is the class of all members of ZFC sets in the class -/
def sInter (x : Class) : Class :=
⋂₀ classToCong x
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => Class.sInter
theorem ofSet.inj {x y : ZFSet.{u}} (h : (x : Class.{u}) = y) : x = y :=
ZFSet.ext fun z => by
change (x : Class.{u}) z ↔ (y : Class.{u}) z
rw [h]
#align Class.of_Set.inj Class.ofSet.inj
@[simp]
theorem toSet_of_ZFSet (A : Class.{u}) (x : ZFSet.{u}) : ToSet A x ↔ A x :=
⟨fun ⟨y, yx, py⟩ => by rwa [ofSet.inj yx] at py, fun px => ⟨x, rfl, px⟩⟩
#align Class.to_Set_of_Set Class.toSet_of_ZFSet
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mem {x : ZFSet.{u}} {A : Class.{u}} : ↑x ∈ A ↔ A x :=
toSet_of_ZFSet _ _
#align Class.coe_mem Class.coe_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_apply {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (y : Class.{u}) x ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Class.coe_apply Class.coe_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x : Class.{u}) ⊆ y ↔ x ⊆ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Class.coe_subset Class.coe_subset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sep (p : Class.{u}) (x : ZFSet.{u}) :
(ZFSet.sep p x : Class) = { y ∈ x | p y } :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_sep
#align Class.coe_sep Class.coe_sep
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ↑(∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = (∅ : Class.{u}) :=
ext fun y => iff_false_iff.2 <| ZFSet.not_mem_empty y
#align Class.coe_empty Class.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑(insert x y) = @insert ZFSet.{u} Class.{u} _ x y :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_insert_iff
#align Class.coe_insert Class.coe_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑(x ∪ y) = (x : Class.{u}) ∪ y :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_union
#align Class.coe_union Class.coe_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑(x ∩ y) = (x : Class.{u}) ∩ y :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_inter
#align Class.coe_inter Class.coe_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑(x \ y) = (x : Class.{u}) \ y :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_diff
#align Class.coe_diff Class.coe_diff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_powerset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑x.powerset = powerset.{u} x :=
ext fun _ => ZFSet.mem_powerset
#align Class.coe_powerset Class.coe_powerset
@[simp]
theorem powerset_apply {A : Class.{u}} {x : ZFSet.{u}} : powerset A x ↔ ↑x ⊆ A :=
Iff.rfl
#align Class.powerset_apply Class.powerset_apply
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_apply {x : Class} {y : ZFSet} : (⋃₀ x) y ↔ ∃ z : ZFSet, x z ∧ y ∈ z := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨z, rfl, hxz⟩, hyz⟩
exact ⟨z, hxz, hyz⟩
· exact fun ⟨z, hxz, hyz⟩ => ⟨_, coe_mem.2 hxz, hyz⟩
#align Class.sUnion_apply Class.sUnion_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : ↑(⋃₀ x : ZFSet) = ⋃₀ (x : Class.{u}) :=
ext fun y =>
ZFSet.mem_sUnion.trans (sUnion_apply.trans <| by rfl).symm
#align Class.coe_sUnion Class.coe_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : Class.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z, z ∈ x ∧ y ∈ z := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨w, rfl, z, hzx, hwz⟩
exact ⟨z, hzx, coe_mem.2 hwz⟩
· rintro ⟨w, hwx, z, rfl, hwz⟩
exact ⟨z, rfl, w, hwx, hwz⟩
#align Class.mem_sUnion Class.mem_sUnion
theorem sInter_apply {x : Class.{u}} {y : ZFSet.{u}} : (⋂₀ x) y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, x z → y ∈ z := by
refine ⟨fun hxy z hxz => hxy _ ⟨z, rfl, hxz⟩, ?_⟩
rintro H - ⟨z, rfl, hxz⟩
exact H _ hxz
#align Class.sInter_apply Class.sInter_apply
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : ↑(⋂₀ x : ZFSet) = ⋂₀ (x : Class.{u}) :=
Set.ext fun _ => (ZFSet.mem_sInter h).trans sInter_apply.symm
#align Class.sInter_coe Class.coe_sInter
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,672 | 1,674 | theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : Class} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by |
obtain ⟨w, rfl, hw⟩ := hy
exact coe_mem.2 (hw z hz)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.ring.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"76de8ae01554c3b37d66544866659ff174e66e1f"
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file defines semirings, rings and domains. This is analogous to `Algebra.Group.Defs` and
`Algebra.Group.Basic`, the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
## Main definitions
* `Distrib`: Typeclass for distributivity of multiplication over addition.
* `HasDistribNeg`: Typeclass for commutativity of negation and multiplication. This is useful when
dealing with multiplicative submonoids which are closed under negation without being closed under
addition, for example `Units`.
* `(NonUnital)(NonAssoc)(Semi)Ring`: Typeclasses for possibly non-unital or non-associative
rings and semirings. Some combinations are not defined yet because they haven't found use.
## Tags
`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`, domain, `IsDomain`, nonzero, units
-/
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
open Function
/-!
### `Distrib` class
-/
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left and right distributive
over addition. -/
class Distrib (R : Type*) extends Mul R, Add R where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align distrib Distrib
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left distributive over addition. -/
class LeftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
#align left_distrib_class LeftDistribClass
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is right distributive over addition. -/
class RightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align right_distrib_class RightDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.leftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] : LeftDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.left_distrib⟩
#align distrib.left_distrib_class Distrib.leftDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.rightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] :
RightDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.right_distrib⟩
#align distrib.right_distrib_class Distrib.rightDistribClass
theorem left_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
LeftDistribClass.left_distrib a b c
#align left_distrib left_distrib
alias mul_add := left_distrib
#align mul_add mul_add
theorem right_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
RightDistribClass.right_distrib a b c
#align right_distrib right_distrib
alias add_mul := right_distrib
#align add_mul add_mul
theorem distrib_three_right [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c d : R) :
(a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d := by simp [right_distrib]
#align distrib_three_right distrib_three_right
/-!
### Classes of semirings and rings
We make sure that the canonical path from `NonAssocSemiring` to `Ring` passes through `Semiring`,
as this is a path which is followed all the time in linear algebra where the defining semilinear map
`σ : R →+* S` depends on the `NonAssocSemiring` structure of `R` and `S` while the module
definition depends on the `Semiring` structure.
It is not currently possible to adjust priorities by hand (see lean4#2115). Instead, the last
declared instance is used, so we make sure that `Semiring` is declared after `NonAssocRing`, so
that `Semiring -> NonAssocSemiring` is tried before `NonAssocRing -> NonAssocSemiring`.
TODO: clean this once lean4#2115 is fixed
-/
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative semiring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends AddCommMonoid α, Distrib α, MulZeroClass α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_semiring NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital semiring. -/
class NonUnitalSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, SemigroupWithZero α
#align non_unital_semiring NonUnitalSemiring
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative semiring. -/
class NonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, MulZeroOneClass α,
AddCommMonoidWithOne α
#align non_assoc_semiring NonAssocSemiring
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocRing (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_ring NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital ring. -/
class NonUnitalRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonUnitalSemiring α
#align non_unital_ring NonUnitalRing
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonAssocRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonAssocSemiring α,
AddCommGroupWithOne α
#align non_assoc_ring NonAssocRing
/-- A `Semiring` is a type with addition, multiplication, a `0` and a `1` where addition is
commutative and associative, multiplication is associative and left and right distributive over
addition, and `0` and `1` are additive and multiplicative identities. -/
class Semiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, NonAssocSemiring α, MonoidWithZero α
#align semiring Semiring
/-- A `Ring` is a `Semiring` with negation making it an additive group. -/
class Ring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, AddCommGroup R, AddGroupWithOne R
#align ring Ring
/-!
### Semirings
-/
section DistribMulOneClass
variable [Add α] [MulOneClass α]
theorem add_one_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (a + 1) * b = a * b + b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align add_one_mul add_one_mul
theorem mul_add_one [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
#align mul_add_one mul_add_one
theorem one_add_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (1 + a) * b = b + a * b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align one_add_mul one_add_mul
theorem mul_one_add [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (1 + b) = a + a * b := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
#align mul_one_add mul_one_add
end DistribMulOneClass
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [right_distrib_class α]
theorem two_mul (n : α) : 2 * n = n + n :=
(congrArg₂ _ one_add_one_eq_two.symm rfl).trans <| (right_distrib 1 1 n).trans (by rw [one_mul])
#align two_mul two_mul
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [right_distrib_class α]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem bit0_eq_two_mul (n : α) : bit0 n = 2 * n :=
(two_mul _).symm
#align bit0_eq_two_mul bit0_eq_two_mul
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [left_distrib_class α]
theorem mul_two (n : α) : n * 2 = n + n :=
(congrArg₂ _ rfl one_add_one_eq_two.symm).trans <| (left_distrib n 1 1).trans (by rw [mul_one])
#align mul_two mul_two
end NonAssocSemiring
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ite {α} [Mul α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c : α) :
(a * if P then b else c) = if P then a * b else a * c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align mul_ite mul_ite
#align add_ite add_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul {α} [Mul α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c : α) :
(if P then a else b) * c = if P then a * c else b * c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align ite_mul ite_mul
#align ite_add ite_add
-- We make `mul_ite` and `ite_mul` simp lemmas,
-- but not `add_ite` or `ite_add`.
-- The problem we're trying to avoid is dealing with
-- summations of the form `∑ x ∈ s, (f x + ite P 1 0)`,
-- in which `add_ite` followed by `sum_ite` would needlessly slice up
-- the `f x` terms according to whether `P` holds at `x`.
-- There doesn't appear to be a corresponding difficulty so far with
-- `mul_ite` and `ite_mul`.
attribute [simp] mul_ite ite_mul
theorem ite_sub_ite {α} [Sub α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c d : α) :
((if P then a else b) - if P then c else d) = if P then a - c else b - d := by
split
repeat rfl
theorem ite_add_ite {α} [Add α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c d : α) :
((if P then a else b) + if P then c else d) = if P then a + c else b + d := by
split
repeat rfl
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] (P Q : Prop) [Decidable P] [Decidable Q] (a b : α)
lemma ite_zero_mul : ite P a 0 * b = ite P (a * b) 0 := by simp
#align ite_mul_zero_left ite_zero_mul
lemma mul_ite_zero : a * ite P b 0 = ite P (a * b) 0 := by simp
#align ite_mul_zero_right mul_ite_zero
lemma ite_zero_mul_ite_zero : ite P a 0 * ite Q b 0 = ite (P ∧ Q) (a * b) 0 := by
simp only [← ite_and, ite_mul, mul_ite, mul_zero, zero_mul, and_comm]
#align ite_and_mul_zero ite_zero_mul_ite_zero
end MulZeroClass
-- Porting note: no @[simp] because simp proves it
theorem mul_boole {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : α) :
(a * if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 0 := by simp
#align mul_boole mul_boole
-- Porting note: no @[simp] because simp proves it
theorem boole_mul {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : α) :
(if P then 1 else 0) * a = if P then a else 0 := by simp
#align boole_mul boole_mul
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative, but commutative semiring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocCommSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, CommMagma α
/-- A non-unital commutative semiring is a `NonUnitalSemiring` with commutative multiplication.
In other words, it is a type with the following structures: additive commutative monoid
(`AddCommMonoid`), commutative semigroup (`CommSemigroup`), distributive laws (`Distrib`), and
multiplication by zero law (`MulZeroClass`). -/
class NonUnitalCommSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, CommSemigroup α
#align non_unital_comm_semiring NonUnitalCommSemiring
/-- A commutative semiring is a semiring with commutative multiplication. -/
class CommSemiring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, CommMonoid R
#align comm_semiring CommSemiring
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CommSemiring.toNonUnitalCommSemiring [CommSemiring α] :
NonUnitalCommSemiring α :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid α), inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring α) with }
#align comm_semiring.to_non_unital_comm_semiring CommSemiring.toNonUnitalCommSemiring
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CommSemiring.toCommMonoidWithZero [CommSemiring α] :
CommMonoidWithZero α :=
{ inferInstanceAs (CommMonoid α), inferInstanceAs (CommSemiring α) with }
#align comm_semiring.to_comm_monoid_with_zero CommSemiring.toCommMonoidWithZero
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring α] {a b c : α}
theorem add_mul_self_eq (a b : α) : (a + b) * (a + b) = a * a + 2 * a * b + b * b := by
simp only [two_mul, add_mul, mul_add, add_assoc, mul_comm b]
#align add_mul_self_eq add_mul_self_eq
lemma add_sq (a b : α) : (a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + 2 * a * b + b ^ 2 := by
simp only [sq, add_mul_self_eq]
#align add_sq add_sq
lemma add_sq' (a b : α) : (a + b) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 + b ^ 2 + 2 * a * b := by
rw [add_sq, add_assoc, add_comm _ (b ^ 2), add_assoc]
#align add_sq' add_sq'
alias add_pow_two := add_sq
#align add_pow_two add_pow_two
end CommSemiring
section HasDistribNeg
/-- Typeclass for a negation operator that distributes across multiplication.
This is useful for dealing with submonoids of a ring that contain `-1` without having to duplicate
lemmas. -/
class HasDistribNeg (α : Type*) [Mul α] extends InvolutiveNeg α where
/-- Negation is left distributive over multiplication -/
neg_mul : ∀ x y : α, -x * y = -(x * y)
/-- Negation is right distributive over multiplication -/
mul_neg : ∀ x y : α, x * -y = -(x * y)
#align has_distrib_neg HasDistribNeg
section Mul
variable [Mul α] [HasDistribNeg α]
@[simp]
theorem neg_mul (a b : α) : -a * b = -(a * b) :=
HasDistribNeg.neg_mul _ _
#align neg_mul neg_mul
@[simp]
theorem mul_neg (a b : α) : a * -b = -(a * b) :=
HasDistribNeg.mul_neg _ _
#align mul_neg mul_neg
theorem neg_mul_neg (a b : α) : -a * -b = a * b := by simp
#align neg_mul_neg neg_mul_neg
theorem neg_mul_eq_neg_mul (a b : α) : -(a * b) = -a * b :=
(neg_mul _ _).symm
#align neg_mul_eq_neg_mul neg_mul_eq_neg_mul
theorem neg_mul_eq_mul_neg (a b : α) : -(a * b) = a * -b :=
(mul_neg _ _).symm
#align neg_mul_eq_mul_neg neg_mul_eq_mul_neg
theorem neg_mul_comm (a b : α) : -a * b = a * -b := by simp
#align neg_mul_comm neg_mul_comm
end Mul
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α]
theorem neg_eq_neg_one_mul (a : α) : -a = -1 * a := by simp
#align neg_eq_neg_one_mul neg_eq_neg_one_mul
/-- An element of a ring multiplied by the additive inverse of one is the element's additive
inverse. -/
theorem mul_neg_one (a : α) : a * -1 = -a := by simp
#align mul_neg_one mul_neg_one
/-- The additive inverse of one multiplied by an element of a ring is the element's additive
inverse. -/
theorem neg_one_mul (a : α) : -1 * a = -a := by simp
#align neg_one_mul neg_one_mul
end MulOneClass
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] [HasDistribNeg α]
instance (priority := 100) MulZeroClass.negZeroClass : NegZeroClass α where
__ := inferInstanceAs (Zero α); __ := inferInstanceAs (InvolutiveNeg α)
neg_zero := by rw [← zero_mul (0 : α), ← neg_mul, mul_zero, mul_zero]
#align mul_zero_class.neg_zero_class MulZeroClass.negZeroClass
end MulZeroClass
end HasDistribNeg
/-!
### Rings
-/
section NonUnitalNonAssocRing
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing α]
instance (priority := 100) NonUnitalNonAssocRing.toHasDistribNeg : HasDistribNeg α where
neg := Neg.neg
neg_neg := neg_neg
neg_mul a b := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by rw [← right_distrib, add_left_neg, zero_mul]
mul_neg a b := eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| by rw [← left_distrib, add_left_neg, mul_zero]
#align non_unital_non_assoc_ring.to_has_distrib_neg NonUnitalNonAssocRing.toHasDistribNeg
theorem mul_sub_left_distrib (a b c : α) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] using mul_add a b (-c)
#align mul_sub_left_distrib mul_sub_left_distrib
alias mul_sub := mul_sub_left_distrib
#align mul_sub mul_sub
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean | 397 | 398 | theorem mul_sub_right_distrib (a b c : α) : (a - b) * c = a * c - b * c := by |
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul] using add_mul a (-b) c
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Wrenna Robson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
#align_import topology.metric_space.infsep from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5316314b553dcf8c6716541851517c1a9715e22b"
/-!
# Infimum separation
This file defines the extended infimum separation of a set. This is approximately dual to the
diameter of a set, but where the extended diameter of a set is the supremum of the extended distance
between elements of the set, the extended infimum separation is the infimum of the (extended)
distance between *distinct* elements in the set.
We also define the infimum separation as the cast of the extended infimum separation to the reals.
This is the infimum of the distance between distinct elements of the set when in a pseudometric
space.
All lemmas and definitions are in the `Set` namespace to give access to dot notation.
## Main definitions
* `Set.einfsep`: Extended infimum separation of a set.
* `Set.infsep`: Infimum separation of a set (when in a pseudometric space).
!-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Set
section Einfsep
open ENNReal
open Function
/-- The "extended infimum separation" of a set with an edist function. -/
noncomputable def einfsep [EDist α] (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s) (_ : x ≠ y), edist x y
#align set.einfsep Set.einfsep
section EDist
variable [EDist α] {x y : α} {s t : Set α}
theorem le_einfsep_iff {d} :
d ≤ s.einfsep ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → d ≤ edist x y := by
simp_rw [einfsep, le_iInf_iff]
#align set.le_einfsep_iff Set.le_einfsep_iff
theorem einfsep_zero : s.einfsep = 0 ↔ ∀ C > 0, ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < C := by
simp_rw [einfsep, ← _root_.bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_zero Set.einfsep_zero
theorem einfsep_pos : 0 < s.einfsep ↔ ∃ C > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → C ≤ edist x y := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, einfsep_zero]
simp only [not_forall, not_exists, not_lt, exists_prop, not_and]
#align set.einfsep_pos Set.einfsep_pos
theorem einfsep_top :
s.einfsep = ∞ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≠ y → edist x y = ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_eq_top]
#align set.einfsep_top Set.einfsep_top
theorem einfsep_lt_top :
s.einfsep < ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < ∞ := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_lt_top Set.einfsep_lt_top
theorem einfsep_ne_top :
s.einfsep ≠ ∞ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y ≠ ∞ := by
simp_rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top, einfsep_lt_top]
#align set.einfsep_ne_top Set.einfsep_ne_top
theorem einfsep_lt_iff {d} :
s.einfsep < d ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≠ y ∧ edist x y < d := by
simp_rw [einfsep, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
#align set.einfsep_lt_iff Set.einfsep_lt_iff
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Infsep.lean | 84 | 86 | theorem nontrivial_of_einfsep_lt_top (hs : s.einfsep < ∞) : s.Nontrivial := by |
rcases einfsep_lt_top.1 hs with ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy, _⟩
exact ⟨_, hx, _, hy, hxy⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Topology.Bornology.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.LocallyFinite
/-!
# Compact sets and compact spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsCompact`: a set such that each open cover has a finite subcover. This is defined in mathlib
using filters. The main property of a compact set is `IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover`.
* `CompactSpace`: typeclass stating that the whole space is a compact set.
* `NoncompactSpace`: a space that is not a compact space.
## Main results
* `isCompact_univ_pi`: **Tychonov's theorem** - an arbitrary product of compact sets
is compact.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace Classical Function
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
-- compact sets
section Compact
lemma IsCompact.exists_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} [NeBot f] (hf : f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hf
lemma IsCompact.exists_mapClusterPt {ι : Type*} (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter ι} [NeBot f]
{u : ι → X} (hf : Filter.map u f ≤ 𝓟 s) :
∃ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x f u := hs hf
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if it belongs to each filter
`𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) :
sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact @hs _ hf inf_le_right
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets IsCompact.compl_mem_sets
/-- The complement to a compact set belongs to a filter `f` if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t`
within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsCompact s) {f : Filter X}
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx => ?_
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, hst⟩
replace ht := mem_inf_principal.1 ht
apply mem_inf_of_inter ht hst
rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ hs
exact h₂ (h₁ hs)
#align is_compact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhds_within IsCompact.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a compact set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsCompact.induction_on (hs : IsCompact s) {p : Set X → Prop} (he : p ∅)
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s) (hunion : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, p s → p t → p (s ∪ t))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := comk p he (fun _t ht _s hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht) (fun _s hs _t ht ↦ hunion hs ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
#align is_compact.induction_on IsCompact.induction_on
/-- The intersection of a compact set and a closed set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_right (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f :=
hs (le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_left))
have : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <|
hx.mono <| le_trans hstf (le_principal_iff.2 inter_subset_right)
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, this⟩, hx⟩
#align is_compact.inter_right IsCompact.inter_right
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_left (ht : IsCompact t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsCompact (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
#align is_compact.inter_left IsCompact.inter_left
/-- The set difference of a compact set and an open set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.diff (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsCompact (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
#align is_compact.diff IsCompact.diff
/-- A closed subset of a compact set is a compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsCompact t :=
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
#align is_compact_of_is_closed_subset IsCompact.of_isClosed_subset
theorem IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsCompact (f '' s) := by
intro l lne ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
#align is_compact.image_of_continuous_on IsCompact.image_of_continuousOn
theorem IsCompact.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align is_compact.image IsCompact.image
theorem IsCompact.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) (hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s)
(ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
Classical.by_cases mem_of_eq_bot fun (this : f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ ≠ ⊥) =>
let ⟨x, hx, (hfx : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ)⟩ := @hs _ ⟨this⟩ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (IsOpen.mem_nhds ht₁ this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
#align is_compact.adherence_nhdset IsCompact.adherence_nhdset
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, ↑f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
refine (forall_neBot_le_iff ?_).trans ?_
· rintro f g hle ⟨x, hxs, hxf⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxf.mono hle⟩
· simp only [Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff]
#align is_compact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds, _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds
#align is_compact.ultrafilter_le_nhds IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds
theorem isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds' :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ f : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ s, ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, le_principal_iff, Ultrafilter.mem_coe]
alias ⟨IsCompact.ultrafilter_le_nhds', _⟩ := isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'
/-- If a compact set belongs to a filter and this filter has a unique cluster point `y` in this set,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma IsCompact.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (hs : IsCompact s) {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(hmem : s ∈ l) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y := by
refine le_iff_ultrafilter.2 fun f hf ↦ ?_
rcases hs.ultrafilter_le_nhds' f (hf hmem) with ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩
convert ← hx
exact h x hxs (.mono (.of_le_nhds hx) hf)
/-- If values of `f : Y → X` belong to a compact set `s` eventually along a filter `l`
and `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l` in `s`,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma IsCompact.tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(hs : IsCompact s) (hmem : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
hs.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt (mem_map.2 hmem) h
/-- For every open directed cover of a compact set, there exists a single element of the
cover which itself includes the set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_cover {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) (hdU : Directed (· ⊆ ·) U) :
∃ i, s ⊆ U i :=
hι.elim fun i₀ =>
IsCompact.induction_on hs ⟨i₀, empty_subset _⟩ (fun _ _ hs ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i, hs.trans hi⟩)
(fun _ _ ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ =>
let ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩ := hdU i j
⟨k, union_subset (Subset.trans hi hki) (Subset.trans hj hkj)⟩)
fun _x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (hUo i) hi), i, Subset.refl _⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_cover IsCompact.elim_directed_cover
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) : ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
hs.elim_directed_cover _ (fun _ => isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hUo i)
(iUnion_eq_iUnion_finset U ▸ hsU)
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h => biUnion_subset_biUnion_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subcover IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x hx, U x hx ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, (⋃ x ∈ t, U x.1 x.2) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s := by
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩ with ⟨t, hst⟩
refine ⟨t, mem_nhdsSet_iff_forall.2 fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hst hx) with ⟨y, hyt, hy⟩
refine mem_of_superset ?_ (subset_biUnion_of_mem hyt)
exact mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hy
lemma IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet (hs : IsCompact s) {U : X → Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ (⋃ x ∈ t, U x) ∈ 𝓝ˢ s :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' (fun x _ => U x) hU
⟨t.image (↑), fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, _, hyx⟩ := Finset.mem_image.1 hx
hyx ▸ y.2,
by rwa [Finset.set_biUnion_finset_image]⟩
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsCompact s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ t : Finset s, s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet' U hU).imp fun _ ↦ subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover' IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover'
theorem IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsCompact s) (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x :=
(hs.elim_nhds_subcover_nhdsSet hU).imp fun _ h ↦ h.imp_right subset_of_mem_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.elim_nhds_subcover IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover
/-- The neighborhood filter of a compact set is disjoint with a filter `l` if and only if the
neighborhood filter of each point of this set is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx => h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H => ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx => (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx => (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx => hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂, biInter_finset_mem]
exact fun x hx => hUl x (hts x hx)
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_left IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- A filter `l` is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of a compact set if and only if it is
disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point of this set. -/
theorem IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} (hs : IsCompact s) :
Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
#align is_compact.disjoint_nhds_set_right IsCompact.disjoint_nhdsSet_right
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every directed family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a single element of the family which itself avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed {ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅)
(hdt : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t) : ∃ i : ι, s ∩ t i = ∅ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hs.elim_directed_cover (compl ∘ t) (fun i => (htc i).isOpen_compl)
(by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using hst)
(hdt.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => compl_subset_compl.mpr)
⟨t, by
simpa only [subset_def, not_forall, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_iUnion, exists_prop,
mem_inter_iff, not_and, iff_self_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] using ht⟩
#align is_compact.elim_directed_family_closed IsCompact.elim_directed_family_closed
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a compact set,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids this compact set. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
hs.elim_directed_family_closed _ (fun t ↦ isClosed_biInter fun _ _ ↦ htc _)
(by rwa [← iInter_eq_iInter_finset])
(directed_of_isDirected_le fun _ _ h ↦ biInter_subset_biInter_left h)
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed IsCompact.elim_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- If `s` is a compact set in a topological space `X` and `f : ι → Set X` is a locally finite
family of sets, then `f i ∩ s` is nonempty only for a finitely many `i`. -/
theorem LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) (hs : IsCompact s) : { i | (f i ∩ s).Nonempty }.Finite := by
choose U hxU hUf using hf
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x _ => hxU x with ⟨t, -, hsU⟩
refine (t.finite_toSet.biUnion fun x _ => hUf x).subset ?_
rintro i ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases mem_iUnion₂.1 (hsU hx.2) with ⟨c, hct, hcx⟩
exact mem_biUnion hct ⟨x, hx.1, hcx⟩
#align locally_finite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_inter_compact
/-- To show that a compact set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every finite subfamily. -/
theorem IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsCompact s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
exact hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed t htc hst
#align is_compact.inter_Inter_nonempty IsCompact.inter_iInter_nonempty
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `iInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{ι : Type v} [hι : Nonempty ι] (t : ι → Set X) (htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t)
(htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i)) (htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) :
(⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
let i₀ := hι.some
suffices (t i₀ ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty by
rwa [inter_eq_right.mpr (iInter_subset _ i₀)] at this
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
apply mt ((htc i₀).elim_directed_family_closed t htcl)
push_neg
simp only [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at htn ⊢
refine ⟨htd, fun i => ?_⟩
rcases htd i₀ i with ⟨j, hji₀, hji⟩
exact (htn j).mono (subset_inter hji₀ hji)
#align is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_compact_closed :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for `sInter`:
the intersection of a directed family of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_sInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
{S : Set (Set X)} [hS : Nonempty S] (hSd : DirectedOn (· ⊇ ·) S) (hSn : ∀ U ∈ S, U.Nonempty)
(hSc : ∀ U ∈ S, IsCompact U) (hScl : ∀ U ∈ S, IsClosed U) : (⋂₀ S).Nonempty := by
rw [sInter_eq_iInter]
exact IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _
(DirectedOn.directed_val hSd) (fun i ↦ hSn i i.2) (fun i ↦ hSc i i.2) (fun i ↦ hScl i i.2)
/-- Cantor's intersection theorem for sequences indexed by `ℕ`:
the intersection of a decreasing sequence of nonempty compact closed sets is nonempty. -/
theorem IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed (t : ℕ → Set X)
(htd : ∀ i, t (i + 1) ⊆ t i) (htn : ∀ i, (t i).Nonempty) (ht0 : IsCompact (t 0))
(htcl : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) : (⋂ i, t i).Nonempty :=
have tmono : Antitone t := antitone_nat_of_succ_le htd
have htd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) t := tmono.directed_ge
have : ∀ i, t i ⊆ t 0 := fun i => tmono <| zero_le i
have htc : ∀ i, IsCompact (t i) := fun i => ht0.of_isClosed_subset (htcl i) (this i)
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed t htd htn htc htcl
#align is_compact.nonempty_Inter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-28")]
alias IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_compact_closed :=
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_sequence_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed
/-- For every open cover of a compact set, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Finite b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_finite_subcover (fun i => c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d.toSet, ?_, d.finite_toSet.image _, ?_⟩
· simp
· rwa [biUnion_image]
#align is_compact.elim_finite_subcover_image IsCompact.elim_finite_subcover_imageₓ
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsCompact s := fun f hf hfs => by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x => (hU x).2, fun x hx => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1⟩, fun t ht => ?_⟩
refine compl_not_mem (le_principal_iff.1 hfs) ?_
refine mem_of_superset ((biInter_finset_mem t).2 fun x _ => hUf x) ?_
rw [subset_compl_comm, compl_iInter₂]
simpa only [compl_compl]
#align is_compact_of_finite_subcover isCompact_of_finite_subcover
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `Disjoint`
/-- A set `s` is compact if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsCompact s :=
isCompact_of_finite_subcover fun U hUo hsU => by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i => (U i)ᶜ) (fun i => (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
#align is_compact_of_finite_subfamily_closed isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a finite subcover. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subcover :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Finset ι, s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subcover, isCompact_of_finite_subcover⟩
#align is_compact_iff_finite_subcover isCompact_iff_finite_subcover
/-- A set `s` is compact if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a finite subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed :
IsCompact s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ → ∃ u : Finset ι, (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs => hs.elim_finite_subfamily_closed, isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed⟩
#align is_compact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed isCompact_iff_finite_subfamily_closed
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `𝓝 x ×ˢ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `t ∈ l` such that `U ×ˢ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter Y} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ×ˢ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l := by
refine hK.induction_on (by simp) (fun t t' ht hs ↦ ?_) (fun t t' ht ht' ↦ ?_) fun x hx ↦ ?_
· exact prod_mono (nhdsSet_mono ht) le_rfl hs
· simp [sup_prod, *]
· rcases ((nhds_basis_opens _).prod l.basis_sets).mem_iff.1 (hs x hx)
with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨hx, huo⟩, hv⟩, hs⟩
refine ⟨u, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (huo.mem_nhds hx), mem_of_superset ?_ hs⟩
exact prod_mem_prod (huo.mem_nhdsSet.2 Subset.rfl) hv
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter Y) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ×ˢ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ×ˢ l :=
le_antisymm (fun s hs ↦ hK.mem_nhdsSet_prod_of_forall <| by simpa using hs)
(iSup₂_le fun x hx ↦ prod_mono (nhds_le_nhdsSet hx) le_rfl)
theorem IsCompact.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ y ∈ K, l ×ˢ 𝓝 y := by
simp only [prod_comm (f := l), hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, map_iSup]
/-- If `s : Set (X × Y)` belongs to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 y` for all `y` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ×ˢ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `t ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `t ×ˢ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set Y} {l : Filter X} {s : Set (X × Y)}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
-- TODO: Is there a way to prove directly the `inf` version and then deduce the `Prod` one ?
-- That would seem a bit more natural.
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l = ⨆ x ∈ K, 𝓝 x ⊓ l := by
have : ∀ f : Filter X, f ⊓ l = comap (fun x ↦ (x, x)) (f ×ˢ l) := fun f ↦ by
simpa only [comap_prod] using congrArg₂ (· ⊓ ·) comap_id.symm comap_id.symm
simp_rw [this, ← comap_iSup, hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup]
theorem IsCompact.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup {K : Set X} (hK : IsCompact K) (l : Filter X) :
l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K) = ⨆ x ∈ K, l ⊓ 𝓝 x := by
simp only [inf_comm l, hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup]
/-- If `s : Set X` belongs to `𝓝 x ⊓ l` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `(𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l`,
i.e., there exist an open `U ⊇ K` and `T ∈ l` such that `U ∩ T ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_nhdsSet_inf_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ x ∈ K, s ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ l) : s ∈ (𝓝ˢ K) ⊓ l :=
(hK.nhdsSet_inf_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- If `s : Set S` belongs to `l ⊓ 𝓝 x` for all `x` from a compact set `K`,
then it belongs to `l ⊓ (𝓝ˢ K)`,
i.e., there exist `T ∈ l` and an open `U ⊇ K` such that `T ∩ U ⊆ s`. -/
theorem IsCompact.mem_inf_nhdsSet_of_forall {K : Set X} {l : Filter X} {s : Set X}
(hK : IsCompact K) (hs : ∀ y ∈ K, s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝 y) : s ∈ l ⊓ 𝓝ˢ K :=
(hK.inf_nhdsSet_eq_biSup l).symm ▸ by simpa using hs
/-- To show that `∀ y ∈ K, P x y` holds for `x` close enough to `x₀` when `K` is compact,
it is sufficient to show that for all `y₀ ∈ K` there `P x y` holds for `(x, y)` close enough
to `(x₀, y₀)`.
Provided for backwards compatibility,
see `IsCompact.mem_prod_nhdsSet_of_forall` for a stronger statement.
-/
theorem IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually {x₀ : X} {K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K)
{P : X → Y → Prop} (hP : ∀ y ∈ K, ∀ᶠ z : X × Y in 𝓝 (x₀, y), P z.1 z.2) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ y ∈ K, P x y := by
simp only [nhds_prod_eq, ← eventually_iSup, ← hK.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup] at hP
exact hP.curry.mono fun _ h ↦ h.self_of_nhdsSet
#align is_compact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually IsCompact.eventually_forall_of_forall_eventually
@[simp]
theorem isCompact_empty : IsCompact (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf hsf =>
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
#align is_compact_empty isCompact_empty
@[simp]
theorem isCompact_singleton {x : X} : IsCompact ({x} : Set X) := fun f hf hfa =>
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
#align is_compact_singleton isCompact_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isCompact (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsCompact s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isCompact_empty fun _ => isCompact_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.is_compact Set.Subsingleton.isCompact
-- Porting note: golfed a proof instead of fixing it
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) : IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'.2 fun l hl => by
rw [Ultrafilter.finite_biUnion_mem_iff hs] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨i, his, hi⟩
rcases (hf i his).ultrafilter_le_nhds _ (le_principal_iff.2 hi) with ⟨x, hxi, hlx⟩
exact ⟨x, mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, his, hxi⟩, hlx⟩
#align set.finite.is_compact_bUnion Set.Finite.isCompact_biUnion
theorem Finset.isCompact_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsCompact (f i)) :
IsCompact (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isCompact_biUnion hf
#align finset.is_compact_bUnion Finset.isCompact_biUnion
theorem isCompact_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsCompact (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsCompact (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isCompact_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
#align is_compact_accumulate isCompact_accumulate
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite) (hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsCompact s) :
IsCompact (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isCompact_biUnion hc
-- Porting note: generalized to `ι : Sort*`
theorem isCompact_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Finite ι] (h : ∀ i, IsCompact (f i)) :
IsCompact (⋃ i, f i) :=
(finite_range f).isCompact_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_compact_Union isCompact_iUnion
theorem Set.Finite.isCompact (hs : s.Finite) : IsCompact s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isCompact_biUnion fun _ _ => isCompact_singleton
#align set.finite.is_compact Set.Finite.isCompact
theorem IsCompact.finite_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsCompact s) : s.Finite := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, _, hst⟩
simp only [← t.set_biUnion_coe, biUnion_of_singleton] at hst
exact t.finite_toSet.subset hst
#align is_compact.finite_of_discrete IsCompact.finite_of_discrete
theorem isCompact_iff_finite [DiscreteTopology X] : IsCompact s ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h => h.finite_of_discrete, fun h => h.isCompact⟩
#align is_compact_iff_finite isCompact_iff_finite
theorem IsCompact.union (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IsCompact (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isCompact_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
#align is_compact.union IsCompact.union
protected theorem IsCompact.insert (hs : IsCompact s) (a) : IsCompact (insert a s) :=
isCompact_singleton.union hs
#align is_compact.insert IsCompact.insert
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: reformulate using `𝓝ˢ`
/-- If `V : ι → Set X` is a decreasing family of closed compact sets then any neighborhood of
`⋂ i, V i` contains some `V i`. We assume each `V i` is compact *and* closed because `X` is
not assumed to be Hausdorff. See `exists_subset_nhd_of_compact` for version assuming this. -/
theorem exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact' [Nonempty ι] {V : ι → Set X}
(hV : Directed (· ⊇ ·) V) (hV_cpct : ∀ i, IsCompact (V i)) (hV_closed : ∀ i, IsClosed (V i))
{U : Set X} (hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U := by
obtain ⟨W, hsubW, W_op, hWU⟩ := exists_open_set_nhds hU
suffices ∃ i, V i ⊆ W from this.imp fun i hi => hi.trans hWU
by_contra! H
replace H : ∀ i, (V i ∩ Wᶜ).Nonempty := fun i => Set.inter_compl_nonempty_iff.mpr (H i)
have : (⋂ i, V i ∩ Wᶜ).Nonempty := by
refine
IsCompact.nonempty_iInter_of_directed_nonempty_isCompact_isClosed _ (fun i j => ?_) H
(fun i => (hV_cpct i).inter_right W_op.isClosed_compl) fun i =>
(hV_closed i).inter W_op.isClosed_compl
rcases hV i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
refine ⟨k, ⟨fun x => ?_, fun x => ?_⟩⟩ <;> simp only [and_imp, mem_inter_iff, mem_compl_iff] <;>
tauto
have : ¬⋂ i : ι, V i ⊆ W := by simpa [← iInter_inter, inter_compl_nonempty_iff]
contradiction
#align exists_subset_nhds_of_is_compact' exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact'
lemma eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis_of_isCompact_open (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (U : Set X) (hUc : IsCompact U) (hUo : IsOpen U) :
∃ s : Set ι, s.Finite ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
obtain ⟨Y, f, e, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion hUo
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
hUc.elim_finite_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) (by rw [e])
refine ⟨t.image f', Set.toFinite _, le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
erw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := Finset.mem_image.mp hi
rw [e]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
lemma eq_sUnion_finset_of_isTopologicalBasis_of_isCompact_open (b : Set (Set X))
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis b) (U : Set X) (hUc : IsCompact U) (hUo : IsOpen U) :
∃ s : Finset b, U = s.toSet.sUnion := by
have hb' : b = range (fun i ↦ i : b → Set X) := by simp
rw [hb'] at hb
choose s hs hU using eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis_of_isCompact_open _ hb U hUc hUo
have : Finite s := hs
let _ : Fintype s := Fintype.ofFinite _
use s.toFinset
simp [hU]
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isCompact_open_iff_eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsCompact (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsCompact U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Finite ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· exact fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis_of_isCompact_open _ hb U h₁ h₂
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isCompact_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
#align is_compact_open_iff_eq_finite_Union_of_is_topological_basis isCompact_open_iff_eq_finite_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis
namespace Filter
theorem hasBasis_cocompact : (cocompact X).HasBasis IsCompact compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isCompact_empty⟩
#align filter.has_basis_cocompact Filter.hasBasis_cocompact
theorem mem_cocompact : s ∈ cocompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_cocompact.mem_iff
#align filter.mem_cocompact Filter.mem_cocompact
theorem mem_cocompact' : s ∈ cocompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_cocompact.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
#align filter.mem_cocompact' Filter.mem_cocompact'
theorem _root_.IsCompact.compl_mem_cocompact (hs : IsCompact s) : sᶜ ∈ Filter.cocompact X :=
hasBasis_cocompact.mem_of_mem hs
#align is_compact.compl_mem_cocompact IsCompact.compl_mem_cocompact
theorem cocompact_le_cofinite : cocompact X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isCompact.compl_mem_cocompact
#align filter.cocompact_le_cofinite Filter.cocompact_le_cofinite
theorem cocompact_eq_cofinite (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] :
cocompact X = cofinite := by
simp only [cocompact, hasBasis_cofinite.eq_biInf, isCompact_iff_finite]
#align filter.cocompact_eq_cofinite Filter.cocompact_eq_cofinite
/-- A filter is disjoint from the cocompact filter if and only if it contains a compact set. -/
theorem disjoint_cocompact_left (f : Filter X) :
Disjoint (Filter.cocompact X) f ↔ ∃ K ∈ f, IsCompact K := by
simp_rw [hasBasis_cocompact.disjoint_iff_left, compl_compl]
tauto
/-- A filter is disjoint from the cocompact filter if and only if it contains a compact set. -/
theorem disjoint_cocompact_right (f : Filter X) :
Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X) ↔ ∃ K ∈ f, IsCompact K := by
simp_rw [hasBasis_cocompact.disjoint_iff_right, compl_compl]
tauto
@[deprecated "see `cocompact_eq_atTop` with `import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Nat`"
(since := "2024-02-07")]
theorem _root_.Nat.cocompact_eq : cocompact ℕ = atTop :=
(cocompact_eq_cofinite ℕ).trans Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop
#align nat.cocompact_eq Nat.cocompact_eq
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cocompact {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (cocompact X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) : IsCompact (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_cocompact.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
#align filter.tendsto.is_compact_insert_range_of_cocompact Filter.Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cocompact
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cofinite {f : ι → X} {x} (hf : Tendsto f cofinite (𝓝 x)) :
IsCompact (insert x (range f)) := by
letI : TopologicalSpace ι := ⊥; haveI h : DiscreteTopology ι := ⟨rfl⟩
rw [← cocompact_eq_cofinite ι] at hf
exact hf.isCompact_insert_range_of_cocompact continuous_of_discreteTopology
#align filter.tendsto.is_compact_insert_range_of_cofinite Filter.Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cofinite
theorem Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range {f : ℕ → X} {x} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x)) :
IsCompact (insert x (range f)) :=
Filter.Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range_of_cofinite <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop.symm ▸ hf
#align filter.tendsto.is_compact_insert_range Filter.Tendsto.isCompact_insert_range
theorem hasBasis_coclosedCompact :
(Filter.coclosedCompact X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsCompact s) compl := by
simp only [Filter.coclosedCompact, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isCompact_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩
#align filter.has_basis_coclosed_compact Filter.hasBasis_coclosedCompact
/-- A set belongs to `coclosedCompact` if and only if the closure of its complement is compact. -/
theorem mem_coclosedCompact_iff :
s ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ IsCompact (closure sᶜ) := by
refine hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_iff.trans ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ⟨htcl, htco⟩, hst⟩
exact htco.of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure <|
closure_minimal (compl_subset_comm.2 hst) htcl
· exact ⟨closure sᶜ, ⟨isClosed_closure, h⟩, compl_subset_comm.2 subset_closure⟩
@[deprecated mem_coclosedCompact_iff (since := "2024-02-16")]
theorem mem_coclosedCompact : s ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_iff, and_assoc]
#align filter.mem_coclosed_compact Filter.mem_coclosedCompact
@[deprecated mem_coclosedCompact_iff (since := "2024-02-16")]
theorem mem_coclosed_compact' : s ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ ∃ t, IsClosed t ∧ IsCompact t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t := by
simp only [hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_iff, compl_subset_comm, and_assoc]
#align filter.mem_coclosed_compact' Filter.mem_coclosed_compact'
/-- Complement of a set belongs to `coclosedCompact` if and only if its closure is compact. -/
theorem compl_mem_coclosedCompact : sᶜ ∈ coclosedCompact X ↔ IsCompact (closure s) := by
rw [mem_coclosedCompact_iff, compl_compl]
theorem cocompact_le_coclosedCompact : cocompact X ≤ coclosedCompact X :=
iInf_mono fun _ => le_iInf fun _ => le_rfl
#align filter.cocompact_le_coclosed_compact Filter.cocompact_le_coclosedCompact
end Filter
theorem IsCompact.compl_mem_coclosedCompact_of_isClosed (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : IsClosed s) :
sᶜ ∈ Filter.coclosedCompact X :=
hasBasis_coclosedCompact.mem_of_mem ⟨hs', hs⟩
#align is_compact.compl_mem_coclosed_compact_of_is_closed IsCompact.compl_mem_coclosedCompact_of_isClosed
namespace Bornology
variable (X) in
/-- Sets that are contained in a compact set form a bornology. Its `cobounded` filter is
`Filter.cocompact`. See also `Bornology.relativelyCompact` the bornology of sets with compact
closure. -/
def inCompact : Bornology X where
cobounded' := Filter.cocompact X
le_cofinite' := Filter.cocompact_le_cofinite
#align bornology.in_compact Bornology.inCompact
theorem inCompact.isBounded_iff : @IsBounded _ (inCompact X) s ↔ ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
change sᶜ ∈ Filter.cocompact X ↔ _
rw [Filter.mem_cocompact]
simp
#align bornology.in_compact.is_bounded_iff Bornology.inCompact.isBounded_iff
end Bornology
#noalign nhds_contain_boxes
#noalign nhds_contain_boxes.symm
#noalign nhds_contain_boxes.comm
#noalign nhds_contain_boxes_of_singleton
#noalign nhds_contain_boxes_of_compact
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets, then the set neighborhoods filter of `s ×ˢ t`
is the product of set neighborhoods filters for `s` and `t`.
For general sets, only the `≤` inequality holds, see `nhdsSet_prod_le`. -/
theorem IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq {t : Set Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ t) = 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := by
simp_rw [hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq_biSup, ht.prod_nhdsSet_eq_biSup, nhdsSet, sSup_image, biSup_prod,
nhds_prod_eq]
theorem nhdsSet_prod_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {f : Filter Y} (hs : IsCompact s)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact Y)) :
𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ f ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ Set.univ) := by
obtain ⟨K, hKf, hK⟩ := (disjoint_cocompact_right f).mp hf
calc
𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ f
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓟 K := Filter.prod_mono_right _ (Filter.le_principal_iff.mpr hKf)
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ s ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ K := Filter.prod_mono_right _ principal_le_nhdsSet
_ = 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ K) := (hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq hK).symm
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (s ×ˢ Set.univ) := nhdsSet_mono (prod_mono_right le_top)
theorem prod_nhdsSet_le_of_disjoint_cocompact {f : Filter X} (ht : IsCompact t)
(hf : Disjoint f (Filter.cocompact X)) :
f ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t ≤ 𝓝ˢ (Set.univ ×ˢ t) := by
obtain ⟨K, hKf, hK⟩ := (disjoint_cocompact_right f).mp hf
calc
f ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t
_ ≤ (𝓟 K) ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := Filter.prod_mono_left _ (Filter.le_principal_iff.mpr hKf)
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ K ×ˢ 𝓝ˢ t := Filter.prod_mono_left _ principal_le_nhdsSet
_ = 𝓝ˢ (K ×ˢ t) := (hK.nhdsSet_prod_eq ht).symm
_ ≤ 𝓝ˢ (Set.univ ×ˢ t) := nhdsSet_mono (prod_mono_left le_top)
/-- If `s` and `t` are compact sets and `n` is an open neighborhood of `s × t`, then there exist
open neighborhoods `u ⊇ s` and `v ⊇ t` such that `u × v ⊆ n`.
See also `IsCompact.nhdsSet_prod_eq`. -/
theorem generalized_tube_lemma (hs : IsCompact s) {t : Set Y} (ht : IsCompact t)
{n : Set (X × Y)} (hn : IsOpen n) (hp : s ×ˢ t ⊆ n) :
∃ (u : Set X) (v : Set Y), IsOpen u ∧ IsOpen v ∧ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ v ∧ u ×ˢ v ⊆ n := by
rw [← hn.mem_nhdsSet, hs.nhdsSet_prod_eq ht,
((hasBasis_nhdsSet _).prod (hasBasis_nhdsSet _)).mem_iff] at hp
rcases hp with ⟨⟨u, v⟩, ⟨⟨huo, hsu⟩, hvo, htv⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨u, v, huo, hvo, hsu, htv, hn⟩
#align generalized_tube_lemma generalized_tube_lemma
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 10) Subsingleton.compactSpace [Subsingleton X] : CompactSpace X :=
⟨subsingleton_univ.isCompact⟩
#align subsingleton.compact_space Subsingleton.compactSpace
theorem isCompact_univ_iff : IsCompact (univ : Set X) ↔ CompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.1⟩
#align is_compact_univ_iff isCompact_univ_iff
theorem isCompact_univ [h : CompactSpace X] : IsCompact (univ : Set X) :=
h.isCompact_univ
#align is_compact_univ isCompact_univ
theorem exists_clusterPt_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] (f : Filter X) [NeBot f] :
∃ x, ClusterPt x f := by
simpa using isCompact_univ (show f ≤ 𝓟 univ by simp)
#align cluster_point_of_compact exists_clusterPt_of_compactSpace
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias cluster_point_of_compact := exists_clusterPt_of_compactSpace
nonrec theorem Ultrafilter.le_nhds_lim [CompactSpace X] (F : Ultrafilter X) : ↑F ≤ 𝓝 F.lim := by
rcases isCompact_univ.ultrafilter_le_nhds F (by simp) with ⟨x, -, h⟩
exact le_nhds_lim ⟨x, h⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ultrafilter.le_nhds_Lim Ultrafilter.le_nhds_lim
theorem CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover [CompactSpace X] (U : X → Set X) (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = ⊤ := by
obtain ⟨t, -, s⟩ := IsCompact.elim_nhds_subcover isCompact_univ U fun x _ => hU x
exact ⟨t, top_unique s⟩
#align compact_space.elim_nhds_subcover CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover
theorem compactSpace_of_finite_subfamily_closed
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → ⋂ i, t i = ∅ →
∃ u : Finset ι, ⋂ i ∈ u, t i = ∅) :
CompactSpace X where
isCompact_univ := isCompact_of_finite_subfamily_closed fun t => by simpa using h t
#align compact_space_of_finite_subfamily_closed compactSpace_of_finite_subfamily_closed
theorem IsClosed.isCompact [CompactSpace X] (h : IsClosed s) : IsCompact s :=
isCompact_univ.of_isClosed_subset h (subset_univ _)
#align is_closed.is_compact IsClosed.isCompact
/-- If a filter has a unique cluster point `y` in a compact topological space,
then the filter is less than or equal to `𝓝 y`. -/
lemma le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt [CompactSpace X] {l : Filter X} {y : X}
(h : ∀ x, ClusterPt x l → x = y) : l ≤ 𝓝 y :=
isCompact_univ.le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt univ_mem fun x _ ↦ h x
/-- If `y` is a unique `MapClusterPt` for `f` along `l`
and the codomain of `f` is a compact space,
then `f` tends to `𝓝 y` along `l`. -/
lemma tendsto_nhds_of_unique_mapClusterPt [CompactSpace X] {l : Filter Y} {y : X} {f : Y → X}
(h : ∀ x, MapClusterPt x l f → x = y) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 y) :=
le_nhds_of_unique_clusterPt h
-- Porting note: a lemma instead of `export` to make `X` explicit
lemma noncompact_univ (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [NoncompactSpace X] :
¬IsCompact (univ : Set X) :=
NoncompactSpace.noncompact_univ
theorem IsCompact.ne_univ [NoncompactSpace X] (hs : IsCompact s) : s ≠ univ := fun h =>
noncompact_univ X (h ▸ hs)
#align is_compact.ne_univ IsCompact.ne_univ
instance [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X) := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.neBot_iff.2 fun hs => ?_
contrapose hs; rw [not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, compl_empty_iff] at hs
rw [hs]; exact noncompact_univ X
@[simp]
theorem Filter.cocompact_eq_bot [CompactSpace X] : Filter.cocompact X = ⊥ :=
Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.eq_bot_iff.mpr ⟨Set.univ, isCompact_univ, Set.compl_univ⟩
#align filter.cocompact_eq_bot Filter.cocompact_eq_bot
instance [NoncompactSpace X] : NeBot (Filter.coclosedCompact X) :=
neBot_of_le Filter.cocompact_le_coclosedCompact
theorem noncompactSpace_of_neBot (_ : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X)) : NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h' => (Filter.nonempty_of_mem h'.compl_mem_cocompact).ne_empty compl_univ⟩
#align noncompact_space_of_ne_bot noncompactSpace_of_neBot
theorem Filter.cocompact_neBot_iff : NeBot (Filter.cocompact X) ↔ NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨noncompactSpace_of_neBot, fun _ => inferInstance⟩
#align filter.cocompact_ne_bot_iff Filter.cocompact_neBot_iff
theorem not_compactSpace_iff : ¬CompactSpace X ↔ NoncompactSpace X :=
⟨fun h₁ => ⟨fun h₂ => h₁ ⟨h₂⟩⟩, fun ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ => h₁ h₂⟩
#align not_compact_space_iff not_compactSpace_iff
instance : NoncompactSpace ℤ :=
noncompactSpace_of_neBot <| by simp only [Filter.cocompact_eq_cofinite, Filter.cofinite_neBot]
-- Note: We can't make this into an instance because it loops with `Finite.compactSpace`.
/-- A compact discrete space is finite. -/
theorem finite_of_compact_of_discrete [CompactSpace X] [DiscreteTopology X] : Finite X :=
Finite.of_finite_univ <| isCompact_univ.finite_of_discrete
#align finite_of_compact_of_discrete finite_of_compact_of_discrete
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact
{K : Set X} (hs : s.Infinite) (hK : IsCompact K) (hsub : s ⊆ K) :
∃ x ∈ K, AccPt x (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
(@hK _ hs.cofinite_inf_principal_neBot (inf_le_right.trans <| principal_mono.2 hsub)).imp
fun x hx ↦ by rwa [acc_iff_cluster, inf_comm, inf_right_comm,
(finite_singleton _).cofinite_inf_principal_compl]
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_of_subset_isCompact {K : Set X} (hs : s.Infinite)
(hK : IsCompact K) (hsub : s ⊆ K) : ∃ x ∈ K, AccPt x (𝓟 s) :=
let ⟨x, hxK, hx⟩ := hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact hK hsub
⟨x, hxK, hx.mono inf_le_right⟩
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal [CompactSpace X] (hs : s.Infinite) :
∃ x, AccPt x (cofinite ⊓ 𝓟 s) := by
simpa only [mem_univ, true_and]
using hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal_of_subset_isCompact isCompact_univ s.subset_univ
lemma Set.Infinite.exists_accPt_principal [CompactSpace X] (hs : s.Infinite) : ∃ x, AccPt x (𝓟 s) :=
hs.exists_accPt_cofinite_inf_principal.imp fun _x hx ↦ hx.mono inf_le_right
theorem exists_nhds_ne_neBot (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] [CompactSpace X] [Infinite X] :
∃ z : X, (𝓝[≠] z).NeBot := by
simpa [AccPt] using (@infinite_univ X _).exists_accPt_principal
#align exists_nhds_ne_ne_bot exists_nhds_ne_neBot
theorem finite_cover_nhds_interior [CompactSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, interior (U x) = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := isCompact_univ.elim_finite_subcover (fun x => interior (U x))
(fun _ => isOpen_interior) fun x _ => mem_iUnion.2 ⟨x, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 (hU x)⟩
⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 ht⟩
#align finite_cover_nhds_interior finite_cover_nhds_interior
theorem finite_cover_nhds [CompactSpace X] {U : X → Set X} (hU : ∀ x, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Finset X, ⋃ x ∈ t, U x = univ :=
let ⟨t, ht⟩ := finite_cover_nhds_interior hU
⟨t, univ_subset_iff.1 <| ht.symm.subset.trans <| iUnion₂_mono fun _ _ => interior_subset⟩
#align finite_cover_nhds finite_cover_nhds
/-- If `X` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of sets of `X` can have only finitely
many nonempty elements. -/
theorem LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_of_compact [CompactSpace X] {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) : { i | (f i).Nonempty }.Finite := by
simpa only [inter_univ] using hf.finite_nonempty_inter_compact isCompact_univ
#align locally_finite.finite_nonempty_of_compact LocallyFinite.finite_nonempty_of_compact
/-- If `X` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of nonempty sets of `X` can have only
finitely many elements, `Set.Finite` version. -/
theorem LocallyFinite.finite_of_compact [CompactSpace X] {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) (hne : ∀ i, (f i).Nonempty) : (univ : Set ι).Finite := by
simpa only [hne] using hf.finite_nonempty_of_compact
#align locally_finite.finite_of_compact LocallyFinite.finite_of_compact
/-- If `X` is a compact space, then a locally finite family of nonempty sets of `X` can have only
finitely many elements, `Fintype` version. -/
noncomputable def LocallyFinite.fintypeOfCompact [CompactSpace X] {f : ι → Set X}
(hf : LocallyFinite f) (hne : ∀ i, (f i).Nonempty) : Fintype ι :=
fintypeOfFiniteUniv (hf.finite_of_compact hne)
#align locally_finite.fintype_of_compact LocallyFinite.fintypeOfCompact
/-- The comap of the cocompact filter on `Y` by a continuous function `f : X → Y` is less than or
equal to the cocompact filter on `X`.
This is a reformulation of the fact that images of compact sets are compact. -/
theorem Filter.comap_cocompact_le {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
(Filter.cocompact Y).comap f ≤ Filter.cocompact X := by
rw [(Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.comap f).le_basis_iff Filter.hasBasis_cocompact]
intro t ht
refine ⟨f '' t, ht.image hf, ?_⟩
simpa using t.subset_preimage_image f
#align filter.comap_cocompact_le Filter.comap_cocompact_le
theorem isCompact_range [CompactSpace X] {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f) : IsCompact (range f) := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact isCompact_univ.image hf
#align is_compact_range isCompact_range
theorem isCompact_diagonal [CompactSpace X] : IsCompact (diagonal X) :=
@range_diag X ▸ isCompact_range (continuous_id.prod_mk continuous_id)
#align is_compact_diagonal isCompact_diagonal
-- Porting note: renamed, golfed
/-- If `X` is a compact topological space, then `Prod.snd : X × Y → Y` is a closed map. -/
theorem isClosedMap_snd_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] :
IsClosedMap (Prod.snd : X × Y → Y) := fun s hs => by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
intro y hy
have : univ ×ˢ {y} ⊆ sᶜ := by
exact fun (x, y') ⟨_, rfl⟩ hs => hy ⟨(x, y'), hs, rfl⟩
rcases generalized_tube_lemma isCompact_univ isCompact_singleton hs.isOpen_compl this
with ⟨U, V, -, hVo, hU, hV, hs⟩
refine mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨V, ?_, hVo, hV rfl⟩
rintro _ hzV ⟨z, hzs, rfl⟩
exact hs ⟨hU trivial, hzV⟩ hzs
#align is_closed_proj_of_is_compact isClosedMap_snd_of_compactSpace
/-- If `Y` is a compact topological space, then `Prod.fst : X × Y → X` is a closed map. -/
theorem isClosedMap_fst_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace Y] : IsClosedMap (Prod.fst : X × Y → X) :=
isClosedMap_snd_of_compactSpace.comp isClosedMap_swap
theorem exists_subset_nhds_of_compactSpace [CompactSpace X] [Nonempty ι]
{V : ι → Set X} (hV : Directed (· ⊇ ·) V) (hV_closed : ∀ i, IsClosed (V i)) {U : Set X}
(hU : ∀ x ∈ ⋂ i, V i, U ∈ 𝓝 x) : ∃ i, V i ⊆ U :=
exists_subset_nhds_of_isCompact' hV (fun i => (hV_closed i).isCompact) hV_closed hU
#align exists_subset_nhds_of_compact_space exists_subset_nhds_of_compactSpace
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `Inducing` map, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is compact
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Inducing.isCompact_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (f '' s) := by
refine ⟨fun hs => hs.image hf.continuous, fun hs F F_ne_bot F_le => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨_, ⟨x, x_in : x ∈ s, rfl⟩, hx : ClusterPt (f x) (map f F)⟩ :=
hs ((map_mono F_le).trans_eq map_principal)
exact ⟨x, x_in, hf.mapClusterPt_iff.1 hx⟩
#align inducing.is_compact_iff Inducing.isCompact_iff
/-- If `f : X → Y` is an `Embedding`, the image `f '' s` of a set `s` is compact
if and only if `s` is compact. -/
theorem Embedding.isCompact_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Embedding f) :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (f '' s) := hf.toInducing.isCompact_iff
#align embedding.is_compact_iff_is_compact_image Embedding.isCompact_iff
/-- The preimage of a compact set under an inducing map is a compact set. -/
theorem Inducing.isCompact_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) (hf' : IsClosed (range f))
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) := by
replace hK := hK.inter_right hf'
rwa [hf.isCompact_iff, image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
lemma Inducing.isCompact_preimage_iff {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) {K : Set Y}
(Kf : K ⊆ range f) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) ↔ IsCompact K := by
rw [hf.isCompact_iff, image_preimage_eq_of_subset Kf]
/-- The preimage of a compact set in the image of an inducing map is compact. -/
lemma Inducing.isCompact_preimage' {f : X → Y} (hf : Inducing f) {K : Set Y}
(hK: IsCompact K) (Kf : K ⊆ range f) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) :=
(hf.isCompact_preimage_iff Kf).2 hK
/-- The preimage of a compact set under a closed embedding is a compact set. -/
theorem ClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage {f : X → Y} (hf : ClosedEmbedding f)
{K : Set Y} (hK : IsCompact K) : IsCompact (f ⁻¹' K) :=
hf.toInducing.isCompact_preimage (hf.isClosed_range) hK
#align closed_embedding.is_compact_preimage ClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage
/-- A closed embedding is proper, ie, inverse images of compact sets are contained in compacts.
Moreover, the preimage of a compact set is compact, see `ClosedEmbedding.isCompact_preimage`. -/
theorem ClosedEmbedding.tendsto_cocompact {f : X → Y} (hf : ClosedEmbedding f) :
Tendsto f (Filter.cocompact X) (Filter.cocompact Y) :=
Filter.hasBasis_cocompact.tendsto_right_iff.mpr fun _K hK =>
(hf.isCompact_preimage hK).compl_mem_cocompact
#align closed_embedding.tendsto_cocompact ClosedEmbedding.tendsto_cocompact
/-- Sets of subtype are compact iff the image under a coercion is. -/
theorem Subtype.isCompact_iff {p : X → Prop} {s : Set { x // p x }} :
IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact ((↑) '' s : Set X) :=
embedding_subtype_val.isCompact_iff
#align is_compact_iff_is_compact_in_subtype Subtype.isCompact_iff
theorem isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ : IsCompact s ↔ IsCompact (univ : Set s) := by
rw [Subtype.isCompact_iff, image_univ, Subtype.range_coe]
#align is_compact_iff_is_compact_univ isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ
theorem isCompact_iff_compactSpace : IsCompact s ↔ CompactSpace s :=
isCompact_iff_isCompact_univ.trans isCompact_univ_iff
#align is_compact_iff_compact_space isCompact_iff_compactSpace
theorem IsCompact.finite (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : DiscreteTopology s) : s.Finite :=
finite_coe_iff.mp (@finite_of_compact_of_discrete _ _ (isCompact_iff_compactSpace.mp hs) hs')
#align is_compact.finite IsCompact.finite
theorem exists_nhds_ne_inf_principal_neBot (hs : IsCompact s) (hs' : s.Infinite) :
∃ z ∈ s, (𝓝[≠] z ⊓ 𝓟 s).NeBot :=
hs'.exists_accPt_of_subset_isCompact hs Subset.rfl
#align exists_nhds_ne_inf_principal_ne_bot exists_nhds_ne_inf_principal_neBot
protected theorem ClosedEmbedding.noncompactSpace [NoncompactSpace X] {f : X → Y}
(hf : ClosedEmbedding f) : NoncompactSpace Y :=
noncompactSpace_of_neBot hf.tendsto_cocompact.neBot
#align closed_embedding.noncompact_space ClosedEmbedding.noncompactSpace
protected theorem ClosedEmbedding.compactSpace [h : CompactSpace Y] {f : X → Y}
(hf : ClosedEmbedding f) : CompactSpace X :=
⟨by rw [hf.toInducing.isCompact_iff, image_univ]; exact hf.isClosed_range.isCompact⟩
#align closed_embedding.compact_space ClosedEmbedding.compactSpace
theorem IsCompact.prod {t : Set Y} (hs : IsCompact s) (ht : IsCompact t) :
IsCompact (s ×ˢ t) := by
rw [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds'] at hs ht ⊢
intro f hfs
obtain ⟨x : X, sx : x ∈ s, hx : map Prod.fst f.1 ≤ 𝓝 x⟩ :=
hs (f.map Prod.fst) (mem_map.2 <| mem_of_superset hfs fun x => And.left)
obtain ⟨y : Y, ty : y ∈ t, hy : map Prod.snd f.1 ≤ 𝓝 y⟩ :=
ht (f.map Prod.snd) (mem_map.2 <| mem_of_superset hfs fun x => And.right)
rw [map_le_iff_le_comap] at hx hy
refine ⟨⟨x, y⟩, ⟨sx, ty⟩, ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]; exact le_inf hx hy
#align is_compact.prod IsCompact.prod
/-- Finite topological spaces are compact. -/
instance (priority := 100) Finite.compactSpace [Finite X] : CompactSpace X where
isCompact_univ := finite_univ.isCompact
#align finite.compact_space Finite.compactSpace
/-- The product of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [CompactSpace X] [CompactSpace Y] : CompactSpace (X × Y) :=
⟨by rw [← univ_prod_univ]; exact isCompact_univ.prod isCompact_univ⟩
/-- The disjoint union of two compact spaces is compact. -/
instance [CompactSpace X] [CompactSpace Y] : CompactSpace (X ⊕ Y) :=
⟨by
rw [← range_inl_union_range_inr]
exact (isCompact_range continuous_inl).union (isCompact_range continuous_inr)⟩
instance {X : ι → Type*} [Finite ι] [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)] [∀ i, CompactSpace (X i)] :
CompactSpace (Σi, X i) := by
refine ⟨?_⟩
rw [Sigma.univ]
exact isCompact_iUnion fun i => isCompact_range continuous_sigmaMk
/-- The coproduct of the cocompact filters on two topological spaces is the cocompact filter on
their product. -/
theorem Filter.coprod_cocompact :
(Filter.cocompact X).coprod (Filter.cocompact Y) = Filter.cocompact (X × Y) := by
apply le_antisymm
· exact sup_le (comap_cocompact_le continuous_fst) (comap_cocompact_le continuous_snd)
· refine (hasBasis_cocompact.coprod hasBasis_cocompact).ge_iff.2 fun K hK ↦ ?_
rw [← univ_prod, ← prod_univ, ← compl_prod_eq_union]
exact (hK.1.prod hK.2).compl_mem_cocompact
#align filter.coprod_cocompact Filter.coprod_cocompact
theorem Prod.noncompactSpace_iff :
NoncompactSpace (X × Y) ↔ NoncompactSpace X ∧ Nonempty Y ∨ Nonempty X ∧ NoncompactSpace Y := by
simp [← Filter.cocompact_neBot_iff, ← Filter.coprod_cocompact, Filter.coprod_neBot_iff]
#align prod.noncompact_space_iff Prod.noncompactSpace_iff
-- See Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Prod.noncompactSpace_left [NoncompactSpace X] [Nonempty Y] :
NoncompactSpace (X × Y) :=
Prod.noncompactSpace_iff.2 (Or.inl ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
#align prod.noncompact_space_left Prod.noncompactSpace_left
-- See Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Prod.noncompactSpace_right [Nonempty X] [NoncompactSpace Y] :
NoncompactSpace (X × Y) :=
Prod.noncompactSpace_iff.2 (Or.inr ⟨‹_›, ‹_›⟩)
#align prod.noncompact_space_right Prod.noncompactSpace_right
section Tychonoff
variable {X : ι → Type*} [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (X i)]
/-- **Tychonoff's theorem**: product of compact sets is compact. -/
theorem isCompact_pi_infinite {s : ∀ i, Set (X i)} :
(∀ i, IsCompact (s i)) → IsCompact { x : ∀ i, X i | ∀ i, x i ∈ s i } := by
simp only [isCompact_iff_ultrafilter_le_nhds, nhds_pi, le_pi, le_principal_iff]
intro h f hfs
have : ∀ i : ι, ∃ x, x ∈ s i ∧ Tendsto (Function.eval i) f (𝓝 x) := by
refine fun i => h i (f.map _) (mem_map.2 ?_)
exact mem_of_superset hfs fun x hx => hx i
choose x hx using this
exact ⟨x, fun i => (hx i).left, fun i => (hx i).right⟩
#align is_compact_pi_infinite isCompact_pi_infinite
/-- **Tychonoff's theorem** formulated using `Set.pi`: product of compact sets is compact. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Compact.lean | 1,150 | 1,153 | theorem isCompact_univ_pi {s : ∀ i, Set (X i)} (h : ∀ i, IsCompact (s i)) :
IsCompact (pi univ s) := by |
convert isCompact_pi_infinite h
simp only [← mem_univ_pi, setOf_mem_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Reindex
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.basis from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6c263e4bfc2e6714de30f22178b4d0ca4d149a76"
/-!
# Bases and matrices
This file defines the map `Basis.toMatrix` that sends a family of vectors to
the matrix of their coordinates with respect to some basis.
## Main definitions
* `Basis.toMatrix e v` is the matrix whose `i, j`th entry is `e.repr (v j) i`
* `basis.toMatrixEquiv` is `Basis.toMatrix` bundled as a linear equiv
## Main results
* `LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix`: `LinearMap.toMatrix b c id`
is equal to `Basis.toMatrix b c`
* `Basis.toMatrix_mul_toMatrix`: multiplying `Basis.toMatrix` with another
`Basis.toMatrix` gives a `Basis.toMatrix`
## Tags
matrix, basis
-/
noncomputable section
open LinearMap Matrix Set Submodule
open Matrix
section BasisToMatrix
variable {ι ι' κ κ' : Type*}
variable {R M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {R₂ M₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₂] [AddCommGroup M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
open Function Matrix
/-- From a basis `e : ι → M` and a family of vectors `v : ι' → M`, make the matrix whose columns
are the vectors `v i` written in the basis `e`. -/
def Basis.toMatrix (e : Basis ι R M) (v : ι' → M) : Matrix ι ι' R := fun i j => e.repr (v j) i
#align basis.to_matrix Basis.toMatrix
variable (e : Basis ι R M) (v : ι' → M) (i : ι) (j : ι')
namespace Basis
theorem toMatrix_apply : e.toMatrix v i j = e.repr (v j) i :=
rfl
#align basis.to_matrix_apply Basis.toMatrix_apply
theorem toMatrix_transpose_apply : (e.toMatrix v)ᵀ j = e.repr (v j) :=
funext fun _ => rfl
#align basis.to_matrix_transpose_apply Basis.toMatrix_transpose_apply
theorem toMatrix_eq_toMatrix_constr [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (v : ι → M) :
e.toMatrix v = LinearMap.toMatrix e e (e.constr ℕ v) := by
ext
rw [Basis.toMatrix_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Basis.constr_basis]
#align basis.to_matrix_eq_to_matrix_constr Basis.toMatrix_eq_toMatrix_constr
-- TODO (maybe) Adjust the definition of `Basis.toMatrix` to eliminate the transpose.
theorem coePiBasisFun.toMatrix_eq_transpose [Finite ι] :
((Pi.basisFun R ι).toMatrix : Matrix ι ι R → Matrix ι ι R) = Matrix.transpose := by
ext M i j
rfl
#align basis.coe_pi_basis_fun.to_matrix_eq_transpose Basis.coePiBasisFun.toMatrix_eq_transpose
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_self [DecidableEq ι] : e.toMatrix e = 1 := by
unfold Basis.toMatrix
ext i j
simp [Basis.equivFun, Matrix.one_apply, Finsupp.single_apply, eq_comm]
#align basis.to_matrix_self Basis.toMatrix_self
theorem toMatrix_update [DecidableEq ι'] (x : M) :
e.toMatrix (Function.update v j x) = Matrix.updateColumn (e.toMatrix v) j (e.repr x) := by
ext i' k
rw [Basis.toMatrix, Matrix.updateColumn_apply, e.toMatrix_apply]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, update_same j x v]
· rw [update_noteq h]
#align basis.to_matrix_update Basis.toMatrix_update
/-- The basis constructed by `unitsSMul` has vectors given by a diagonal matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_unitsSMul [DecidableEq ι] (e : Basis ι R₂ M₂) (w : ι → R₂ˣ) :
e.toMatrix (e.unitsSMul w) = diagonal ((↑) ∘ w) := by
ext i j
by_cases h : i = j
· simp [h, toMatrix_apply, unitsSMul_apply, Units.smul_def]
· simp [h, toMatrix_apply, unitsSMul_apply, Units.smul_def, Ne.symm h]
#align basis.to_matrix_units_smul Basis.toMatrix_unitsSMul
/-- The basis constructed by `isUnitSMul` has vectors given by a diagonal matrix. -/
@[simp]
theorem toMatrix_isUnitSMul [DecidableEq ι] (e : Basis ι R₂ M₂) {w : ι → R₂}
(hw : ∀ i, IsUnit (w i)) : e.toMatrix (e.isUnitSMul hw) = diagonal w :=
e.toMatrix_unitsSMul _
#align basis.to_matrix_is_unit_smul Basis.toMatrix_isUnitSMul
@[simp]
theorem sum_toMatrix_smul_self [Fintype ι] : ∑ i : ι, e.toMatrix v i j • e i = v j := by
simp_rw [e.toMatrix_apply, e.sum_repr]
#align basis.sum_to_matrix_smul_self Basis.sum_toMatrix_smul_self
theorem toMatrix_smul {R₁ S : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [Ring S] [Algebra R₁ S] [Fintype ι]
[DecidableEq ι] (x : S) (b : Basis ι R₁ S) (w : ι → S) :
(b.toMatrix (x • w)) = (Algebra.leftMulMatrix b x) * (b.toMatrix w) := by
ext
rw [Basis.toMatrix_apply, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, ← Algebra.leftMulMatrix_mulVec_repr]
rfl
theorem toMatrix_map_vecMul {S : Type*} [Ring S] [Algebra R S] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R S)
(v : ι' → S) : b ᵥ* ((b.toMatrix v).map <| algebraMap R S) = v := by
ext i
simp_rw [vecMul, dotProduct, Matrix.map_apply, ← Algebra.commutes, ← Algebra.smul_def,
sum_toMatrix_smul_self]
#align basis.to_matrix_map_vec_mul Basis.toMatrix_map_vecMul
@[simp]
theorem toLin_toMatrix [Finite ι] [Fintype ι'] [DecidableEq ι'] (v : Basis ι' R M) :
Matrix.toLin v e (e.toMatrix v) = LinearMap.id :=
v.ext fun i => by cases nonempty_fintype ι; rw [toLin_self, id_apply, e.sum_toMatrix_smul_self]
#align basis.to_lin_to_matrix Basis.toLin_toMatrix
/-- From a basis `e : ι → M`, build a linear equivalence between families of vectors `v : ι → M`,
and matrices, making the matrix whose columns are the vectors `v i` written in the basis `e`. -/
def toMatrixEquiv [Fintype ι] (e : Basis ι R M) : (ι → M) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix ι ι R where
toFun := e.toMatrix
map_add' v w := by
ext i j
change _ = _ + _
rw [e.toMatrix_apply, Pi.add_apply, LinearEquiv.map_add]
rfl
map_smul' := by
intro c v
ext i j
dsimp only []
rw [e.toMatrix_apply, Pi.smul_apply, LinearEquiv.map_smul]
rfl
invFun m j := ∑ i, m i j • e i
left_inv := by
intro v
ext j
exact e.sum_toMatrix_smul_self v j
right_inv := by
intro m
ext k l
simp only [e.toMatrix_apply, ← e.equivFun_apply, ← e.equivFun_symm_apply,
LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
#align basis.to_matrix_equiv Basis.toMatrixEquiv
variable (R₂) in
theorem restrictScalars_toMatrix [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [Nontrivial S]
[Algebra R₂ S] [Module S M₂] [IsScalarTower R₂ S M₂] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R₂ S]
(b : Basis ι S M₂) (v : ι → span R₂ (Set.range b)) :
(algebraMap R₂ S).mapMatrix ((b.restrictScalars R₂).toMatrix v) =
b.toMatrix (fun i ↦ (v i : M₂)) := by
ext
rw [RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, Matrix.map_apply, Basis.toMatrix_apply,
Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply, Basis.toMatrix_apply]
end Basis
section MulLinearMapToMatrix
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (b' : Basis ι' R M) (c : Basis κ R N) (c' : Basis κ' R N)
variable (f : M →ₗ[R] N)
open LinearMap
section Fintype
/-- A generalization of `LinearMap.toMatrix_id`. -/
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] [Finite ι'] :
LinearMap.toMatrix b b' id = b'.toMatrix b := by
ext i
apply LinearMap.toMatrix_apply
#align linear_map.to_matrix_id_eq_basis_to_matrix LinearMap.toMatrix_id_eq_basis_toMatrix
variable [Fintype ι']
@[simp]
theorem basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix [Finite κ] [Fintype κ'] [DecidableEq ι'] :
c.toMatrix c' * LinearMap.toMatrix b' c' f = LinearMap.toMatrix b' c f :=
(Matrix.toLin b' c).injective <| by
haveI := Classical.decEq κ'
rw [toLin_toMatrix, toLin_mul b' c' c, toLin_toMatrix, c.toLin_toMatrix, LinearMap.id_comp]
#align basis_to_matrix_mul_linear_map_to_matrix basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix
theorem basis_toMatrix_mul [Fintype κ] [Finite ι] [DecidableEq κ]
(b₁ : Basis ι R M) (b₂ : Basis ι' R M) (b₃ : Basis κ R N) (A : Matrix ι' κ R) :
b₁.toMatrix b₂ * A = LinearMap.toMatrix b₃ b₁ (toLin b₃ b₂ A) := by
have := basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix b₃ b₁ b₂ (Matrix.toLin b₃ b₂ A)
rwa [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin] at this
#align basis_to_matrix_mul basis_toMatrix_mul
variable [Finite κ] [Fintype ι]
@[simp]
theorem linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix [Finite κ'] [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq ι'] :
LinearMap.toMatrix b' c' f * b'.toMatrix b = LinearMap.toMatrix b c' f :=
(Matrix.toLin b c').injective <| by
rw [toLin_toMatrix, toLin_mul b b' c', toLin_toMatrix, b'.toLin_toMatrix, LinearMap.comp_id]
#align linear_map_to_matrix_mul_basis_to_matrix linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix
theorem basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix
[Fintype κ'] [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq ι'] :
c.toMatrix c' * LinearMap.toMatrix b' c' f * b'.toMatrix b = LinearMap.toMatrix b c f := by
cases nonempty_fintype κ
rw [basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix, linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix]
#align basis_to_matrix_mul_linear_map_to_matrix_mul_basis_to_matrix basis_toMatrix_mul_linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix
theorem mul_basis_toMatrix [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq ι'] (b₁ : Basis ι R M) (b₂ : Basis ι' R M)
(b₃ : Basis κ R N) (A : Matrix κ ι R) :
A * b₁.toMatrix b₂ = LinearMap.toMatrix b₂ b₃ (toLin b₁ b₃ A) := by
cases nonempty_fintype κ
have := linearMap_toMatrix_mul_basis_toMatrix b₂ b₁ b₃ (Matrix.toLin b₁ b₃ A)
rwa [LinearMap.toMatrix_toLin] at this
#align mul_basis_to_matrix mul_basis_toMatrix
theorem basis_toMatrix_basisFun_mul (b : Basis ι R (ι → R)) (A : Matrix ι ι R) :
b.toMatrix (Pi.basisFun R ι) * A = of fun i j => b.repr (Aᵀ j) i := by
classical
simp only [basis_toMatrix_mul _ _ (Pi.basisFun R ι), Matrix.toLin_eq_toLin']
ext i j
rw [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Matrix.toLin'_apply, Pi.basisFun_apply,
Matrix.mulVec_stdBasis_apply, Matrix.of_apply]
#align basis_to_matrix_basis_fun_mul basis_toMatrix_basisFun_mul
/-- See also `Basis.toMatrix_reindex` which gives the `simp` normal form of this result. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Basis.lean | 245 | 250 | theorem Basis.toMatrix_reindex' [DecidableEq ι] [DecidableEq ι'] (b : Basis ι R M) (v : ι' → M)
(e : ι ≃ ι') : (b.reindex e).toMatrix v = Matrix.reindexAlgEquiv _ e (b.toMatrix (v ∘ e)) := by |
ext
simp only [Basis.toMatrix_apply, Basis.repr_reindex, Matrix.reindexAlgEquiv_apply,
Matrix.reindex_apply, Matrix.submatrix_apply, Function.comp_apply, e.apply_symm_apply,
Finsupp.mapDomain_equiv_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticChar.Basic
#align_import number_theory.legendre_symbol.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Legendre symbol
This file contains results about Legendre symbols.
We define the Legendre symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$ as `legendreSym p a`.
Note the order of arguments! The advantage of this form is that then `legendreSym p`
is a multiplicative map.
The Legendre symbol is used to define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a`
and (odd) natural numbers `b`, which extends the Legendre symbol.
## Main results
We also prove the supplementary laws that give conditions for when `-1`
is a square modulo a prime `p`:
`legendreSym.at_neg_one` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_one_iff` for `-1`.
See `NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity` for the conditions when `2` and `-2`
are squares:
`legendreSym.at_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_two_iff` for `2`,
`legendreSym.at_neg_two` and `ZMod.exists_sq_eq_neg_two_iff` for `-2`.
## Tags
quadratic residue, quadratic nonresidue, Legendre symbol
-/
open Nat
section Euler
namespace ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- Euler's Criterion: A unit `x` of `ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion_units (x : (ZMod p)ˣ) : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ x ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
by_cases hc : p = 2
· subst hc
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton, exists_const]
· have h₀ := FiniteField.unit_isSquare_iff (by rwa [ringChar_zmod_n]) x
have hs : (∃ y : (ZMod p)ˣ, y ^ 2 = x) ↔ IsSquare x := by
rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq x]
simp_rw [eq_comm]
rw [hs]
rwa [card p] at h₀
#align zmod.euler_criterion_units ZMod.euler_criterion_units
/-- Euler's Criterion: a nonzero `a : ZMod p` is a square if and only if `x ^ (p / 2) = 1`. -/
theorem euler_criterion {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) : IsSquare (a : ZMod p) ↔ a ^ (p / 2) = 1 := by
apply (iff_congr _ (by simp [Units.ext_iff])).mp (euler_criterion_units p (Units.mk0 a ha))
simp only [Units.ext_iff, sq, Units.val_mk0, Units.val_mul]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy⟩; exact ⟨y, hy.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
simp [zero_pow, mul_zero, ne_eq, not_true] at ha
refine ⟨Units.mk0 y hy, ?_⟩; simp
#align zmod.euler_criterion ZMod.euler_criterion
/-- If `a : ZMod p` is nonzero, then `a^(p/2)` is either `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one {a : ZMod p} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a ^ (p / 2) = 1 ∨ a ^ (p / 2) = -1 := by
cases' Prime.eq_two_or_odd (@Fact.out p.Prime _) with hp2 hp_odd
· subst p; revert a ha; intro a; fin_cases a
· tauto
· simp
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← pow_add, ← two_mul, two_mul_odd_div_two hp_odd]
exact pow_card_sub_one_eq_one ha
#align zmod.pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one ZMod.pow_div_two_eq_neg_one_or_one
end ZMod
end Euler
section Legendre
/-!
### Definition of the Legendre symbol and basic properties
-/
open ZMod
variable (p : ℕ) [Fact p.Prime]
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a : ℤ` and a prime `p`, `legendreSym p a`,
is an integer defined as
* `0` if `a` is `0` modulo `p`;
* `1` if `a` is a nonzero square modulo `p`
* `-1` otherwise.
Note the order of the arguments! The advantage of the order chosen here is
that `legendreSym p` is a multiplicative function `ℤ → ℤ`.
-/
def legendreSym (a : ℤ) : ℤ :=
quadraticChar (ZMod p) a
#align legendre_sym legendreSym
namespace legendreSym
/-- We have the congruence `legendreSym p a ≡ a ^ (p / 2) mod p`. -/
theorem eq_pow (a : ℤ) : (legendreSym p a : ZMod p) = (a : ZMod p) ^ (p / 2) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (ringChar (ZMod p)) 2 with hc | hc
· by_cases ha : (a : ZMod p) = 0
· rw [legendreSym, ha, quadraticChar_zero,
zero_pow (Nat.div_pos (@Fact.out p.Prime).two_le (succ_pos 1)).ne']
norm_cast
· have := (ringChar_zmod_n p).symm.trans hc
-- p = 2
subst p
rw [legendreSym, quadraticChar_eq_one_of_char_two hc ha]
revert ha
push_cast
generalize (a : ZMod 2) = b; fin_cases b
· tauto
· simp
· convert quadraticChar_eq_pow_of_char_ne_two' hc (a : ZMod p)
exact (card p).symm
#align legendre_sym.eq_pow legendreSym.eq_pow
/-- If `p ∤ a`, then `legendreSym p a` is `1` or `-1`. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ∨ legendreSym p a = -1 :=
quadraticChar_dichotomy ha
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_or_neg_one legendreSym.eq_one_or_neg_one
theorem eq_neg_one_iff_not_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬legendreSym p a = 1 :=
quadraticChar_eq_neg_one_iff_not_one ha
#align legendre_sym.eq_neg_one_iff_not_one legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff_not_one
/-- The Legendre symbol of `p` and `a` is zero iff `p ∣ a`. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = 0 ↔ (a : ZMod p) = 0 :=
quadraticChar_eq_zero_iff
#align legendre_sym.eq_zero_iff legendreSym.eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem at_zero : legendreSym p 0 = 0 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_zero, MulChar.map_zero]
#align legendre_sym.at_zero legendreSym.at_zero
@[simp]
theorem at_one : legendreSym p 1 = 1 := by rw [legendreSym, Int.cast_one, MulChar.map_one]
#align legendre_sym.at_one legendreSym.at_one
/-- The Legendre symbol is multiplicative in `a` for `p` fixed. -/
protected theorem mul (a b : ℤ) : legendreSym p (a * b) = legendreSym p a * legendreSym p b := by
simp [legendreSym, Int.cast_mul, map_mul, quadraticCharFun_mul]
#align legendre_sym.mul legendreSym.mul
/-- The Legendre symbol is a homomorphism of monoids with zero. -/
@[simps]
def hom : ℤ →*₀ ℤ where
toFun := legendreSym p
map_zero' := at_zero p
map_one' := at_one p
map_mul' := legendreSym.mul p
#align legendre_sym.hom legendreSym.hom
/-- The square of the symbol is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a ^ 2 = 1 :=
quadraticChar_sq_one ha
#align legendre_sym.sq_one legendreSym.sq_one
/-- The Legendre symbol of `a^2` at `p` is 1 if `p ∤ a`. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p (a ^ 2) = 1 := by
dsimp only [legendreSym]
rw [Int.cast_pow]
exact quadraticChar_sq_one' ha
#align legendre_sym.sq_one' legendreSym.sq_one'
/-- The Legendre symbol depends only on `a` mod `p`. -/
protected theorem mod (a : ℤ) : legendreSym p a = legendreSym p (a % p) := by
simp only [legendreSym, intCast_mod]
#align legendre_sym.mod legendreSym.mod
/-- When `p ∤ a`, then `legendreSym p a = 1` iff `a` is a square mod `p`. -/
theorem eq_one_iff {a : ℤ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_one_iff_isSquare ha0
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_iff legendreSym.eq_one_iff
theorem eq_one_iff' {a : ℕ} (ha0 : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0) :
legendreSym p a = 1 ↔ IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [eq_one_iff]
· norm_cast
· exact mod_cast ha0
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_iff' legendreSym.eq_one_iff'
/-- `legendreSym p a = -1` iff `a` is a nonsquare mod `p`. -/
theorem eq_neg_one_iff {a : ℤ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) :=
quadraticChar_neg_one_iff_not_isSquare
#align legendre_sym.eq_neg_one_iff legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff
theorem eq_neg_one_iff' {a : ℕ} : legendreSym p a = -1 ↔ ¬IsSquare (a : ZMod p) := by
rw [eq_neg_one_iff]; norm_cast
#align legendre_sym.eq_neg_one_iff' legendreSym.eq_neg_one_iff'
/-- The number of square roots of `a` modulo `p` is determined by the Legendre symbol. -/
theorem card_sqrts (hp : p ≠ 2) (a : ℤ) :
↑{x : ZMod p | x ^ 2 = a}.toFinset.card = legendreSym p a + 1 :=
quadraticChar_card_sqrts ((ringChar_zmod_n p).substr hp) a
#align legendre_sym.card_sqrts legendreSym.card_sqrts
end legendreSym
end Legendre
section QuadraticForm
/-!
### Applications to binary quadratic forms
-/
namespace legendreSym
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `y ≠ 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0)
{x y : ZMod p} (hy : y ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 := by
apply_fun (· * y⁻¹ ^ 2) at hxy
simp only [zero_mul] at hxy
rw [(by ring : (x ^ 2 - ↑a * y ^ 2) * y⁻¹ ^ 2 = (x * y⁻¹) ^ 2 - a * (y * y⁻¹) ^ 2),
mul_inv_cancel hy, one_pow, mul_one, sub_eq_zero, pow_two] at hxy
exact (eq_one_iff p ha).mpr ⟨x * y⁻¹, hxy.symm⟩
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero legendreSym.eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a = 1` if there is a solution in `ℤ/pℤ`
of the equation `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` with `x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0)
{x y : ZMod p} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : legendreSym p a = 1 := by
haveI hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [zero_pow two_ne_zero, mul_zero, sub_zero, sq_eq_zero_iff] at hxy
exact hx hxy
exact eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy
#align legendre_sym.eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' legendreSym.eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero'
/-- If `legendreSym p a = -1`, then the only solution of `x^2 - a*y^2 = 0` in `ℤ/pℤ`
is the trivial one. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/Basic.lean | 254 | 265 | theorem eq_zero_mod_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : legendreSym p a = -1)
{x y : ZMod p} (hxy : x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 = 0) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by |
have ha : (a : ZMod p) ≠ 0 := by
intro hf
rw [(eq_zero_iff p a).mpr hf] at h
simp at h
by_contra hf
cases' imp_iff_or_not.mp (not_and'.mp hf) with hx hy
· rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero' ha hx hxy, eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
· rw [eq_one_of_sq_sub_mul_sq_eq_zero ha hy hxy, eq_neg_self_iff] at h
exact one_ne_zero h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Noetherian
#align_import ring_theory.localization.submodule from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1ebb20602a8caef435ce47f6373e1aa40851a177"
/-!
# Submodules in localizations of commutative rings
## Implementation notes
See `RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) (S : Type*) [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S] {P : Type*} [CommRing P]
namespace IsLocalization
-- This was previously a `hasCoe` instance, but if `S = R` then this will loop.
-- It could be a `hasCoeT` instance, but we keep it explicit here to avoid slowing down
-- the rest of the library.
/-- Map from ideals of `R` to submodules of `S` induced by `f`. -/
def coeSubmodule (I : Ideal R) : Submodule R S :=
Submodule.map (Algebra.linearMap R S) I
#align is_localization.coe_submodule IsLocalization.coeSubmodule
theorem mem_coeSubmodule (I : Ideal R) {x : S} :
x ∈ coeSubmodule S I ↔ ∃ y : R, y ∈ I ∧ algebraMap R S y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_localization.mem_coe_submodule IsLocalization.mem_coeSubmodule
theorem coeSubmodule_mono {I J : Ideal R} (h : I ≤ J) : coeSubmodule S I ≤ coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_mono h
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_mono IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_mono
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_bot : coeSubmodule S (⊥ : Ideal R) = ⊥ := by
rw [coeSubmodule, Submodule.map_bot]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_bot IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_bot
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_top : coeSubmodule S (⊤ : Ideal R) = 1 := by
rw [coeSubmodule, Submodule.map_top, Submodule.one_eq_range]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_top IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_top
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_sup (I J : Ideal R) :
coeSubmodule S (I ⊔ J) = coeSubmodule S I ⊔ coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_sup _ _ _
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_sup IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_sup
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_mul (I J : Ideal R) :
coeSubmodule S (I * J) = coeSubmodule S I * coeSubmodule S J :=
Submodule.map_mul _ _ (Algebra.ofId R S)
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_mul IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_mul
theorem coeSubmodule_fg (hS : Function.Injective (algebraMap R S)) (I : Ideal R) :
Submodule.FG (coeSubmodule S I) ↔ Submodule.FG I :=
⟨Submodule.fg_of_fg_map _ (LinearMap.ker_eq_bot.mpr hS), Submodule.FG.map _⟩
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_fg IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_fg
@[simp]
theorem coeSubmodule_span (s : Set R) :
coeSubmodule S (Ideal.span s) = Submodule.span R (algebraMap R S '' s) := by
rw [IsLocalization.coeSubmodule, Ideal.span, Submodule.map_span]
rfl
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_span IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_span
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem coeSubmodule_span_singleton (x : R) :
coeSubmodule S (Ideal.span {x}) = Submodule.span R {(algebraMap R S) x} := by
rw [coeSubmodule_span, Set.image_singleton]
#align is_localization.coe_submodule_span_singleton IsLocalization.coeSubmodule_span_singleton
variable {g : R →+* P}
variable {T : Submonoid P} (hy : M ≤ T.comap g) {Q : Type*} [CommRing Q]
variable [Algebra P Q] [IsLocalization T Q]
variable [IsLocalization M S]
section
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Submodule.lean | 94 | 96 | theorem isNoetherianRing (h : IsNoetherianRing R) : IsNoetherianRing S := by |
rw [isNoetherianRing_iff, isNoetherian_iff_wellFounded] at h ⊢
exact OrderEmbedding.wellFounded (IsLocalization.orderEmbedding M S).dual h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.Order.InitialSeg
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8ea5598db6caeddde6cb734aa179cc2408dbd345"
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r o h`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.lift.initialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.lift.principalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. This definition is universe polymorphic:
`Ordinal.omega.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in a specific
universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Well order on an arbitrary type -/
section WellOrderingThm
-- Porting note: `parameter` does not work
-- parameter {σ : Type u}
variable {σ : Type u}
open Function
theorem nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal : Nonempty (σ ↪ Cardinal.{u}) :=
(Embedding.total _ _).resolve_left fun ⟨⟨f, hf⟩⟩ =>
let g : σ → Cardinal.{u} := invFun f
let ⟨x, (hx : g x = 2 ^ sum g)⟩ := invFun_surjective hf (2 ^ sum g)
have : g x ≤ sum g := le_sum.{u, u} g x
not_le_of_gt (by rw [hx]; exact cantor _) this
#align nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
/-- An embedding of any type to the set of cardinals. -/
def embeddingToCardinal : σ ↪ Cardinal.{u} :=
Classical.choice nonempty_embedding_to_cardinal
#align embedding_to_cardinal embeddingToCardinal
/-- Any type can be endowed with a well order, obtained by pulling back the well order over
cardinals by some embedding. -/
def WellOrderingRel : σ → σ → Prop :=
embeddingToCardinal ⁻¹'o (· < ·)
#align well_ordering_rel WellOrderingRel
instance WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder : IsWellOrder σ WellOrderingRel :=
(RelEmbedding.preimage _ _).isWellOrder
#align well_ordering_rel.is_well_order WellOrderingRel.isWellOrder
instance IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty : Nonempty { r // IsWellOrder σ r } :=
⟨⟨WellOrderingRel, inferInstance⟩⟩
#align is_well_order.subtype_nonempty IsWellOrder.subtype_nonempty
end WellOrderingThm
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order WellOrder
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem eta (o : WellOrder) : mk o.α o.r o.wo = o := by
cases o
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align Well_order.eta WellOrder.eta
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_equivalent Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
#align ordinal Ordinal
instance hasWellFoundedOut (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.out.α :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
#align has_well_founded_out hasWellFoundedOut
instance linearOrderOut (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.out.α :=
IsWellOrder.linearOrder o.out.r
#align linear_order_out linearOrderOut
instance isWellOrder_out_lt (o : Ordinal) : IsWellOrder o.out.α (· < ·) :=
o.out.wo
#align is_well_order_out_lt isWellOrder_out_lt
namespace Ordinal
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
#align ordinal.type Ordinal.type
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order. For the embedding as a principal segment, see
`typein.principalSeg`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : Ordinal :=
type (Subrel r { b | r b a })
#align ordinal.typein Ordinal.typein
@[simp]
theorem type_def' (w : WellOrder) : ⟦w⟧ = type w.r := by
cases w
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def' Ordinal.type_def'
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note (#10675): dsimp can not prove this
theorem type_def (r) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : (⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧ : Ordinal) = type r := by
rfl
#align ordinal.type_def Ordinal.type_def
@[simp]
theorem type_out (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal.type o.out.r = o := by
rw [Ordinal.type, WellOrder.eta, Quotient.out_eq]
#align ordinal.type_out Ordinal.type_out
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
#align ordinal.type_eq Ordinal.type_eq
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
#align rel_iso.ordinal_type_eq RelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lt (o : Ordinal) : type ((· < ·) : o.out.α → o.out.α → Prop) = o :=
(type_def' _).symm.trans <| Quotient.out_eq o
#align ordinal.type_lt Ordinal.type_lt
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_is_empty Ordinal.type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
#align ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty Ordinal.type_ne_zero_of_nonempty
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_pempty Ordinal.type_pEmpty
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
#align ordinal.type_empty Ordinal.type_empty
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Unique α] : type r = 1 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_of_unique
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => @type_eq_one_of_unique α r _ h⟩
#align ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique Ordinal.type_eq_one_iff_unique
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_punit Ordinal.type_pUnit
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_unit Ordinal.type_unit
@[simp]
theorem out_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.out.α ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero Ordinal.out_empty_iff_eq_zero
theorem eq_zero_of_out_empty (o : Ordinal) [h : IsEmpty o.out.α] : o = 0 :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty Ordinal.eq_zero_of_out_empty
instance isEmpty_out_zero : IsEmpty (0 : Ordinal).out.α :=
out_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
#align ordinal.is_empty_out_zero Ordinal.isEmpty_out_zero
@[simp]
theorem out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.out.α ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.out.α (· < ·), type_lt]
#align ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero Ordinal.out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero
theorem ne_zero_of_out_nonempty (o : Ordinal) [h : Nonempty o.out.α] : o ≠ 0 :=
out_nonempty_iff_ne_zero.1 h
#align ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty Ordinal.ne_zero_of_out_nonempty
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
#align ordinal.one_ne_zero Ordinal.one_ne_zero
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
--@[simp] -- Porting note: not in simp nf, added aux lemma below
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
#align ordinal.type_preimage Ordinal.type_preimage
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- `simpNF` incorrectly complains the LHS doesn't simplify.
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 309 | 311 | theorem type_preimage_aux {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
@type _ (fun x y => r (f x) (f y)) (inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder β (↑f ⁻¹'o r))) = type r := by |
convert (RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.measure.vector_measure from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70a4f2197832bceab57d7f41379b2592d1110570"
/-!
# Vector valued measures
This file defines vector valued measures, which are σ-additive functions from a set to an add monoid
`M` such that it maps the empty set and non-measurable sets to zero. In the case
that `M = ℝ`, we called the vector measure a signed measure and write `SignedMeasure α`.
Similarly, when `M = ℂ`, we call the measure a complex measure and write `ComplexMeasure α`.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure` is a vector valued, σ-additive function that maps the empty
and non-measurable set to zero.
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map` is the pushforward of a vector measure along a function.
* `MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict` is the restriction of a vector measure on some set.
## Notation
* `v ≤[i] w` means that the vector measure `v` restricted on the set `i` is less than or equal
to the vector measure `w` restricted on `i`, i.e. `v.restrict i ≤ w.restrict i`.
## Implementation notes
We require all non-measurable sets to be mapped to zero in order for the extensionality lemma
to only compare the underlying functions for measurable sets.
We use `HasSum` instead of `tsum` in the definition of vector measures in comparison to `Measure`
since this provides summability.
## Tags
vector measure, signed measure, complex measure
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
/-- A vector measure on a measurable space `α` is a σ-additive `M`-valued function (for some `M`
an add monoid) such that the empty set and non-measurable sets are mapped to zero. -/
structure VectorMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] (M : Type*) [AddCommMonoid M]
[TopologicalSpace M] where
measureOf' : Set α → M
empty' : measureOf' ∅ = 0
not_measurable' ⦃i : Set α⦄ : ¬MeasurableSet i → measureOf' i = 0
m_iUnion' ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
HasSum (fun i => measureOf' (f i)) (measureOf' (⋃ i, f i))
#align measure_theory.vector_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.measure_of' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.measureOf'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.empty' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.empty'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.not_measurable' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.not_measurable'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.m_Union' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.m_iUnion'
/-- A `SignedMeasure` is an `ℝ`-vector measure. -/
abbrev SignedMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :=
VectorMeasure α ℝ
#align measure_theory.signed_measure MeasureTheory.SignedMeasure
/-- A `ComplexMeasure` is a `ℂ`-vector measure. -/
abbrev ComplexMeasure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] :=
VectorMeasure α ℂ
#align measure_theory.complex_measure MeasureTheory.ComplexMeasure
open Set MeasureTheory
namespace VectorMeasure
section
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
attribute [coe] VectorMeasure.measureOf'
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (VectorMeasure α M) fun _ => Set α → M :=
⟨VectorMeasure.measureOf'⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_coe_to_fun MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instCoeFun
initialize_simps_projections VectorMeasure (measureOf' → apply)
#noalign measure_theory.vector_measure.measure_of_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem empty (v : VectorMeasure α M) : v ∅ = 0 :=
v.empty'
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.empty MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.empty
theorem not_measurable (v : VectorMeasure α M) {i : Set α} (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : v i = 0 :=
v.not_measurable' hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.not_measurable
theorem m_iUnion (v : VectorMeasure α M) {f : ℕ → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : HasSum (fun i => v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) :=
v.m_iUnion' hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.m_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.m_iUnion
theorem of_disjoint_iUnion_nat [T2Space M] (v : VectorMeasure α M) {f : ℕ → Set α}
(hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_disjoint_Union_nat MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat
theorem coe_injective : @Function.Injective (VectorMeasure α M) (Set α → M) (⇑) := fun v w h => by
cases v
cases w
congr
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_injective MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_injective
theorem ext_iff' (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : v = w ↔ ∀ i : Set α, v i = w i := by
rw [← coe_injective.eq_iff, Function.funext_iff]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext_iff' MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext_iff'
theorem ext_iff (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : v = w ↔ ∀ i : Set α, MeasurableSet i → v i = w i := by
constructor
· rintro rfl _ _
rfl
· rw [ext_iff']
intro h i
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· exact h i hi
· simp_rw [not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext_iff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s t : VectorMeasure α M} (h : ∀ i : Set α, MeasurableSet i → s i = t i) : s = t :=
(ext_iff s t).2 h
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ext MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext
variable [T2Space M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} {f : ℕ → Set α}
theorem hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : HasSum (fun i => v (f i)) (v (⋃ i, f i)) := by
cases nonempty_encodable β
set g := fun i : ℕ => ⋃ (b : β) (_ : b ∈ Encodable.decode₂ β i), f b with hg
have hg₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (g i) :=
fun _ => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun b => MeasurableSet.iUnion fun _ => hf₁ b
have hg₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on g) := Encodable.iUnion_decode₂_disjoint_on hf₂
have := v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hg₁ hg₂
rw [hg, Encodable.iUnion_decode₂] at this
have hg₃ : (fun i : β => v (f i)) = fun i => v (g (Encodable.encode i)) := by
ext x
rw [hg]
simp only
congr
ext y
simp only [exists_prop, Set.mem_iUnion, Option.mem_def]
constructor
· intro hy
exact ⟨x, (Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).2 rfl, hy⟩
· rintro ⟨b, hb₁, hb₂⟩
rw [Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _] at hb₁
rwa [← Encodable.encode_injective hb₁]
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff, this, ← tsum_iUnion_decode₂]
· exact v.empty
· rw [hg₃]
change Summable ((fun i => v (g i)) ∘ Encodable.encode)
rw [Function.Injective.summable_iff Encodable.encode_injective]
· exact (v.m_iUnion hg₁ hg₂).summable
· intro x hx
convert v.empty
simp only [g, Set.iUnion_eq_empty, Option.mem_def, not_exists, Set.mem_range] at hx ⊢
intro i hi
exact False.elim ((hx i) ((Encodable.decode₂_is_partial_inv _ _).1 hi))
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_sum_of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion
theorem of_disjoint_iUnion [Countable β] {f : β → Set α} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : v (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, v (f i) :=
(hasSum_of_disjoint_iUnion hf₁ hf₂).tsum_eq.symm
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_disjoint_Union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_disjoint_iUnion
theorem of_union {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B) (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B) :
v (A ∪ B) = v A + v B := by
rw [Set.union_eq_iUnion, of_disjoint_iUnion, tsum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool, cond, cond]
exacts [fun b => Bool.casesOn b hB hA, pairwise_disjoint_on_bool.2 h]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_union MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_union
theorem of_add_of_diff {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B) (h : A ⊆ B) :
v A + v (B \ A) = v B := by
rw [← of_union (@Set.disjoint_sdiff_right _ A B) hA (hB.diff hA), Set.union_diff_cancel h]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_add_of_diff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_add_of_diff
theorem of_diff {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [T2Space M]
{v : VectorMeasure α M} {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B)
(h : A ⊆ B) : v (B \ A) = v B - v A := by
rw [← of_add_of_diff hA hB h, add_sub_cancel_left]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_diff MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_diff
theorem of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero {A B : Set α} (hA : MeasurableSet A) (hB : MeasurableSet B)
(h' : v (B \ A) = 0) : v (A \ B) + v B = v A := by
symm
calc
v A = v (A \ B ∪ A ∩ B) := by simp only [Set.diff_union_inter]
_ = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B) := by
rw [of_union]
· rw [disjoint_comm]
exact Set.disjoint_of_subset_left A.inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_self_right
· exact hA.diff hB
· exact hA.inter hB
_ = v (A \ B) + v (A ∩ B ∪ B \ A) := by
rw [of_union, h', add_zero]
· exact Set.disjoint_of_subset_left A.inter_subset_left disjoint_sdiff_self_right
· exact hA.inter hB
· exact hB.diff hA
_ = v (A \ B) + v B := by rw [Set.union_comm, Set.inter_comm, Set.diff_union_inter]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_diff_of_diff_eq_zero
theorem of_iUnion_nonneg {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M]
[OrderClosedTopology M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, 0 ≤ v (f i)) : 0 ≤ v (⋃ i, f i) :=
(v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonneg hf₃
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_Union_nonneg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_iUnion_nonneg
theorem of_iUnion_nonpos {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [OrderedAddCommMonoid M]
[OrderClosedTopology M] {v : VectorMeasure α M} (hf₁ : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf₂ : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) (hf₃ : ∀ i, v (f i) ≤ 0) : v (⋃ i, f i) ≤ 0 :=
(v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂).symm ▸ tsum_nonpos hf₃
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_Union_nonpos MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_iUnion_nonpos
theorem of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : SignedMeasure α} {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B)
(hA₁ : MeasurableSet A) (hB₁ : MeasurableSet B) (hA₂ : 0 ≤ s A) (hB₂ : 0 ≤ s B)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 := by
rw [of_union h hA₁ hB₁] at hAB
linarith
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_nonneg_disjoint_union_eq_zero
theorem of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero {s : SignedMeasure α} {A B : Set α} (h : Disjoint A B)
(hA₁ : MeasurableSet A) (hB₁ : MeasurableSet B) (hA₂ : s A ≤ 0) (hB₂ : s B ≤ 0)
(hAB : s (A ∪ B) = 0) : s A = 0 := by
rw [of_union h hA₁ hB₁] at hAB
linarith
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.of_nonpos_disjoint_union_eq_zero
end
section SMul
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
/-- Given a real number `r` and a signed measure `s`, `smul r s` is the signed
measure corresponding to the function `r • s`. -/
def smul (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := r • ⇑v
empty' := by rw [Pi.smul_apply, empty, smul_zero]
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.smul_apply, v.not_measurable hi, smul_zero]
m_iUnion' _ hf₁ hf₂ := by exact HasSum.const_smul _ (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.smul
instance instSMul : SMul R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨smul⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instSMul
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(r • v) = r • ⇑v := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_smul MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_smul
theorem smul_apply (r : R) (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (r • v) i = r • v i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.smul_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.smul_apply
end SMul
section AddCommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
instance instZero : Zero (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨⟨0, rfl, fun _ _ => rfl, fun _ _ _ => hasSum_zero⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instZero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨0⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.inhabited MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : VectorMeasure α M) = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply (i : Set α) : (0 : VectorMeasure α M) i = 0 := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.zero_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.zero_apply
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
/-- The sum of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := v + w
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.add_apply, v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi, add_zero]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.add (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.add
instance instAdd : Add (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨add⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAdd
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(v + w) = v + w := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_add
theorem add_apply (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (v + w) i = v i + w i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.add_apply
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.addCommMonoid _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_comm_monoid MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAddCommMonoid
/-- `(⇑)` is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : VectorMeasure α M →+ Set α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_fn_add_monoid_hom MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coeFnAddMonoidHom
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [TopologicalSpace M] [TopologicalAddGroup M]
/-- The negative of a vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def neg (v : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := -v
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.neg_apply, neg_eq_zero, v.not_measurable hi]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.neg <| v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg
instance instNeg : Neg (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨neg⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instNeg
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (v : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(-v) = -v := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_neg MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_neg
theorem neg_apply (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (-v) i = -v i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.neg_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.neg_apply
/-- The difference of two vector measure is a vector measure. -/
def sub (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : VectorMeasure α M where
measureOf' := v - w
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' _ hi := by rw [Pi.sub_apply, v.not_measurable hi, w.not_measurable hi, sub_zero]
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := HasSum.sub (v.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂) (w.m_iUnion hf₁ hf₂)
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.sub
instance instSub : Sub (VectorMeasure α M) :=
⟨sub⟩
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.has_sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instSub
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (v w : VectorMeasure α M) : ⇑(v - w) = v - w := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.coe_sub MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.coe_sub
theorem sub_apply (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : (v - w) i = v i - w i := rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.sub_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.sub_apply
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup _ coe_injective coe_zero coe_add coe_neg coe_sub
(fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coe_smul _ _
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.add_comm_group MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instAddCommGroup
end AddCommGroup
section DistribMulAction
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
instance instDistribMulAction [ContinuousAdd M] : DistribMulAction R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.distribMulAction coeFnAddMonoidHom coe_injective coe_smul
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.distrib_mul_action MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instDistribMulAction
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
instance instModule [ContinuousAdd M] : Module R (VectorMeasure α M) :=
Function.Injective.module R coeFnAddMonoidHom coe_injective coe_smul
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.module MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.instModule
end Module
end VectorMeasure
namespace Measure
/-- A finite measure coerced into a real function is a signed measure. -/
@[simps]
def toSignedMeasure (μ : Measure α) [hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ] : SignedMeasure α where
measureOf' := fun s : Set α => if MeasurableSet s then (μ s).toReal else 0
empty' := by simp [μ.empty]
not_measurable' _ hi := if_neg hi
m_iUnion' f hf₁ hf₂ := by
simp only [*, MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁, if_true, measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_toReal_eq]
exacts [(summable_measure_toReal hf₁ hf₂).hasSum, fun _ ↦ measure_ne_top _ _]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure
theorem toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {i : Set α}
(hi : MeasurableSet i) : μ.toSignedMeasure i = (μ i).toReal :=
if_pos hi
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_apply_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable
-- Without this lemma, `singularPart_neg` in `MeasureTheory.Decomposition.Lebesgue` is
-- extremely slow
theorem toSignedMeasure_congr {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν]
(h : μ = ν) : μ.toSignedMeasure = ν.toSignedMeasure := by
congr
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_congr MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_congr
theorem toSignedMeasure_eq_toSignedMeasure_iff {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
[IsFiniteMeasure ν] : μ.toSignedMeasure = ν.toSignedMeasure ↔ μ = ν := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· ext1 i hi
have : μ.toSignedMeasure i = ν.toSignedMeasure i := by rw [h]
rwa [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal] at this
<;> exact measure_ne_top _ _
· congr
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_eq_to_signed_measure_iff MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_eq_toSignedMeasure_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_zero : (0 : Measure α).toSignedMeasure = 0 := by
ext i
simp
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_zero
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_add (μ ν : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν] :
(μ + ν).toSignedMeasure = μ.toSignedMeasure + ν.toSignedMeasure := by
ext i hi
rw [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply,
ENNReal.toReal_add (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)) (ne_of_lt (measure_lt_top _ _)),
VectorMeasure.add_apply, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_add MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_add
@[simp]
theorem toSignedMeasure_smul (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (r : ℝ≥0) :
(r • μ).toSignedMeasure = r • μ.toSignedMeasure := by
ext i hi
rw [toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, VectorMeasure.smul_apply,
toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi, coe_smul, Pi.smul_apply, ENNReal.toReal_smul]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_smul MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_smul
/-- A measure is a vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
@[simps]
def toENNRealVectorMeasure (μ : Measure α) : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞ where
measureOf' := fun i : Set α => if MeasurableSet i then μ i else 0
empty' := by simp [μ.empty]
not_measurable' _ hi := if_neg hi
m_iUnion' _ hf₁ hf₂ := by
simp only
rw [Summable.hasSum_iff ENNReal.summable, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁),
MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion hf₂ hf₁]
exact tsum_congr fun n => if_pos (hf₁ n)
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable {μ : Measure α} {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) :
μ.toENNRealVectorMeasure i = μ i :=
if_pos hi
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_apply_measurable MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable
@[simp]
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_zero : (0 : Measure α).toENNRealVectorMeasure = 0 := by
ext i
simp
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_zero MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_zero
@[simp]
theorem toENNRealVectorMeasure_add (μ ν : Measure α) :
(μ + ν).toENNRealVectorMeasure = μ.toENNRealVectorMeasure + ν.toENNRealVectorMeasure := by
refine MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ext fun i hi => ?_
rw [toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi, add_apply, VectorMeasure.add_apply,
toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi, toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_ennreal_vector_measure_add MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_add
theorem toSignedMeasure_sub_apply {μ ν : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [IsFiniteMeasure ν]
{i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) :
(μ.toSignedMeasure - ν.toSignedMeasure) i = (μ i).toReal - (ν i).toReal := by
rw [VectorMeasure.sub_apply, toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi,
Measure.toSignedMeasure_apply_measurable hi]
#align measure_theory.measure.to_signed_measure_sub_apply MeasureTheory.Measure.toSignedMeasure_sub_apply
end Measure
namespace VectorMeasure
open Measure
section
/-- A vector measure over `ℝ≥0∞` is a measure. -/
def ennrealToMeasure {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (v : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞) : Measure α :=
ofMeasurable (fun s _ => v s) v.empty fun _ hf₁ hf₂ => v.of_disjoint_iUnion_nat hf₁ hf₂
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ennreal_to_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure
theorem ennrealToMeasure_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} {v : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : ennrealToMeasure v s = v s := by
rw [ennrealToMeasure, ofMeasurable_apply _ hs]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.ennreal_to_measure_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure_apply
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure_ennrealToMeasure
(μ : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞) :
toENNRealVectorMeasure (ennrealToMeasure μ) = μ := ext fun s hs => by
rw [toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hs, ennrealToMeasure_apply hs]
@[simp]
theorem ennrealToMeasure_toENNRealVectorMeasure (μ : Measure α) :
ennrealToMeasure (toENNRealVectorMeasure μ) = μ := Measure.ext fun s hs => by
rw [ennrealToMeasure_apply hs, toENNRealVectorMeasure_apply_measurable hs]
/-- The equiv between `VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞` and `Measure α` formed by
`MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.ennrealToMeasure` and
`MeasureTheory.Measure.toENNRealVectorMeasure`. -/
@[simps]
def equivMeasure [MeasurableSpace α] : VectorMeasure α ℝ≥0∞ ≃ Measure α where
toFun := ennrealToMeasure
invFun := toENNRealVectorMeasure
left_inv := toENNRealVectorMeasure_ennrealToMeasure
right_inv := ennrealToMeasure_toENNRealVectorMeasure
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.equiv_measure MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.equivMeasure
end
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable (v : VectorMeasure α M)
/-- The pushforward of a vector measure along a function. -/
def map (v : VectorMeasure α M) (f : α → β) : VectorMeasure β M :=
if hf : Measurable f then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then v (f ⁻¹' s) else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun i hi => if_neg hi
m_iUnion' := by
intro g hg₁ hg₂
simp only
convert v.m_iUnion (fun i => hf (hg₁ i)) fun i j hij => (hg₂ hij).preimage _
· rw [if_pos (hg₁ _)]
· rw [Set.preimage_iUnion, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hg₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map
theorem map_not_measurable {f : α → β} (hf : ¬Measurable f) : v.map f = 0 :=
dif_neg hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_not_measurable
theorem map_apply {f : α → β} (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
v.map f s = v (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [map, dif_pos hf]
exact if_pos hs
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_apply
@[simp]
theorem map_id : v.map id = v :=
ext fun i hi => by rw [map_apply v measurable_id hi, Set.preimage_id]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_id MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_id
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : (0 : VectorMeasure α M).map f = 0 := by
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
rw [map_apply _ hf hi, zero_apply, zero_apply]
· exact dif_neg hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_zero
section
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [TopologicalSpace N]
/-- Given a vector measure `v` on `M` and a continuous `AddMonoidHom` `f : M → N`, `f ∘ v` is a
vector measure on `N`. -/
def mapRange (v : VectorMeasure α M) (f : M →+ N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α N where
measureOf' s := f (v s)
empty' := by simp only; rw [empty, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
not_measurable' i hi := by simp only; rw [not_measurable v hi, AddMonoidHom.map_zero]
m_iUnion' g hg₁ hg₂ := HasSum.map (v.m_iUnion hg₁ hg₂) f hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) {s : Set α} : v.mapRange f hf s = f (v s) :=
rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id : v.mapRange (AddMonoidHom.id M) continuous_id = v := by
ext
rfl
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_id MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_id
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) :
mapRange (0 : VectorMeasure α M) f hf = 0 := by
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousAdd N]
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_add {v w : VectorMeasure α M} {f : M →+ N} (hf : Continuous f) :
(v + w).mapRange f hf = v.mapRange f hf + w.mapRange f hf := by
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRange_add
/-- Given a continuous `AddMonoidHom` `f : M → N`, `mapRangeHom` is the `AddMonoidHom` mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def mapRangeHom (f : M →+ N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure α N where
toFun v := v.mapRange f hf
map_zero' := mapRange_zero hf
map_add' _ _ := mapRange_add hf
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_range_hom MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRangeHom
end ContinuousAdd
section Module
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [Module R M] [Module R N]
variable [ContinuousAdd M] [ContinuousAdd N] [ContinuousConstSMul R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R N]
/-- Given a continuous linear map `f : M → N`, `mapRangeₗ` is the linear map mapping the
vector measure `v` on `M` to the vector measure `f ∘ v` on `N`. -/
def mapRangeₗ (f : M →ₗ[R] N) (hf : Continuous f) : VectorMeasure α M →ₗ[R] VectorMeasure α N where
toFun v := v.mapRange f.toAddMonoidHom hf
map_add' _ _ := mapRange_add hf
map_smul' := by
intros
ext
simp
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_rangeₗ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapRangeₗ
end Module
end
/-- The restriction of a vector measure on some set. -/
def restrict (v : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) : VectorMeasure α M :=
if hi : MeasurableSet i then
{ measureOf' := fun s => if MeasurableSet s then v (s ∩ i) else 0
empty' := by simp
not_measurable' := fun i hi => if_neg hi
m_iUnion' := by
intro f hf₁ hf₂
simp only
convert v.m_iUnion (fun n => (hf₁ n).inter hi)
(hf₂.mono fun i j => Disjoint.mono inf_le_left inf_le_left)
· rw [if_pos (hf₁ _)]
· rw [Set.iUnion_inter, if_pos (MeasurableSet.iUnion hf₁)] }
else 0
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict
theorem restrict_not_measurable {i : Set α} (hi : ¬MeasurableSet i) : v.restrict i = 0 :=
dif_neg hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_not_measurable MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_not_measurable
theorem restrict_apply {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) {j : Set α} (hj : MeasurableSet j) :
v.restrict i j = v (j ∩ i) := by
rw [restrict, dif_pos hi]
exact if_pos hj
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_apply MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_apply
theorem restrict_eq_self {i : Set α} (hi : MeasurableSet i) {j : Set α} (hj : MeasurableSet j)
(hij : j ⊆ i) : v.restrict i j = v j := by
rw [restrict_apply v hi hj, Set.inter_eq_left.2 hij]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_eq_self MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem restrict_empty : v.restrict ∅ = 0 :=
ext fun i hi => by
rw [restrict_apply v MeasurableSet.empty hi, Set.inter_empty, v.empty, zero_apply]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_empty MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_empty
@[simp]
theorem restrict_univ : v.restrict Set.univ = v :=
ext fun i hi => by rw [restrict_apply v MeasurableSet.univ hi, Set.inter_univ]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_univ MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_univ
@[simp]
theorem restrict_zero {i : Set α} : (0 : VectorMeasure α M).restrict i = 0 := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· ext j hj
rw [restrict_apply 0 hi hj, zero_apply, zero_apply]
· exact dif_neg hi
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_zero MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_zero
section ContinuousAdd
variable [ContinuousAdd M]
theorem map_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (f : α → β) : (v + w).map f = v.map f + w.map f := by
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
simp [map_apply _ hf hi]
· simp [map, dif_neg hf]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.map_add
/-- `VectorMeasure.map` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def mapGm (f : α → β) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure β M where
toFun v := v.map f
map_zero' := map_zero f
map_add' _ _ := map_add _ _ f
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.map_gm MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.mapGm
theorem restrict_add (v w : VectorMeasure α M) (i : Set α) :
(v + w).restrict i = v.restrict i + w.restrict i := by
by_cases hi : MeasurableSet i
· ext j hj
simp [restrict_apply _ hi hj]
· simp [restrict_not_measurable _ hi]
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_add MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrict_add
/-- `VectorMeasure.restrict` as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def restrictGm (i : Set α) : VectorMeasure α M →+ VectorMeasure α M where
toFun v := v.restrict i
map_zero' := restrict_zero
map_add' _ _ := restrict_add _ _ i
#align measure_theory.vector_measure.restrict_gm MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.restrictGm
end ContinuousAdd
end
section
variable [MeasurableSpace β]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M]
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] [DistribMulAction R M] [ContinuousConstSMul R M]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/VectorMeasure.lean | 758 | 765 | theorem map_smul {v : VectorMeasure α M} {f : α → β} (c : R) : (c • v).map f = c • v.map f := by |
by_cases hf : Measurable f
· ext i hi
simp [map_apply _ hf hi]
· simp only [map, dif_neg hf]
-- `smul_zero` does not work since we do not require `ContinuousAdd`
ext i
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.SetToL1
#align_import measure_theory.integral.bochner from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"48fb5b5280e7c81672afc9524185ae994553ebf4"
/-!
# Bochner integral
The Bochner integral extends the definition of the Lebesgue integral to functions that map from a
measure space into a Banach space (complete normed vector space). It is constructed here by
extending the integral on simple functions.
## Main definitions
The Bochner integral is defined through the extension process described in the file `SetToL1`,
which follows these steps:
1. Define the integral of the indicator of a set. This is `weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal * x`.
`weightedSMul μ` is shown to be linear in the value `x` and `DominatedFinMeasAdditive`
(defined in the file `SetToL1`) with respect to the set `s`.
2. Define the integral on simple functions of the type `SimpleFunc α E` (notation : `α →ₛ E`)
where `E` is a real normed space. (See `SimpleFunc.integral` for details.)
3. Transfer this definition to define the integral on `L1.simpleFunc α E` (notation :
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E`), see `L1.simpleFunc.integral`. Show that this integral is a continuous linear
map from `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` to `E`.
4. Define the Bochner integral on L1 functions by extending the integral on integrable simple
functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` using `ContinuousLinearMap.extend` and the fact that the embedding of
`α →₁ₛ[μ] E` into `α →₁[μ] E` is dense.
5. Define the Bochner integral on functions as the Bochner integral of its equivalence class in L1
space, if it is in L1, and 0 otherwise.
The result of that construction is `∫ a, f a ∂μ`, which is definitionally equal to
`setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f`. Some basic properties of the integral
(like linearity) are particular cases of the properties of `setToFun` (which are described in the
file `SetToL1`).
## Main statements
1. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → E`, where `α` is a measure
space and `E` is a real normed space.
* `integral_zero` : `∫ 0 ∂μ = 0`
* `integral_add` : `∫ x, f x + g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f ∂μ + ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_neg` : `∫ x, - f x ∂μ = - ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_sub` : `∫ x, f x - g x ∂μ = ∫ x, f x ∂μ - ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_smul` : `∫ x, r • f x ∂μ = r • ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_congr_ae` : `f =ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `norm_integral_le_integral_norm` : `‖∫ x, f x ∂μ‖ ≤ ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ`
2. Basic properties of the Bochner integral on functions of type `α → ℝ`, where `α` is a measure
space.
* `integral_nonneg_of_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos_of_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono_ae` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonneg` : `0 ≤ f → 0 ≤ ∫ x, f x ∂μ`
* `integral_nonpos` : `f ≤ 0 → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ 0`
* `integral_mono` : `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g → ∫ x, f x ∂μ ≤ ∫ x, g x ∂μ`
3. Propositions connecting the Bochner integral with the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued functions,
which is called `lintegral` and has the notation `∫⁻`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` :
`∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f⁺ x ∂μ - ∫⁻ x, f⁻ x ∂μ`,
where `f⁺` is the positive part of `f` and `f⁻` is the negative part of `f`.
* `integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae` : `0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f → ∫ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`
4. (In the file `DominatedConvergence`)
`tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence` : the Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
5. (In the file `SetIntegral`) integration commutes with continuous linear maps.
* `ContinuousLinearMap.integral_comp_comm`
* `LinearIsometry.integral_comp_comm`
## Notes
Some tips on how to prove a proposition if the API for the Bochner integral is not enough so that
you need to unfold the definition of the Bochner integral and go back to simple functions.
One method is to use the theorem `Integrable.induction` in the file `SimpleFuncDenseLp` (or one
of the related results, like `Lp.induction` for functions in `Lp`), which allows you to prove
something for an arbitrary integrable function.
Another method is using the following steps.
See `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part` for a complicated example, which proves
that `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, with the first integral sign being the Bochner integral of a real-valued
function `f : α → ℝ`, and second and third integral sign being the integral on `ℝ≥0∞`-valued
functions (called `lintegral`). The proof of `integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part`
is scattered in sections with the name `posPart`.
Here are the usual steps of proving that a property `p`, say `∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻`, holds for all
functions :
1. First go to the `L¹` space.
For example, if you see `ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal <| ‖f a‖)`, that is the norm of
`f` in `L¹` space. Rewrite using `L1.norm_of_fun_eq_lintegral_norm`.
2. Show that the set `{f ∈ L¹ | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}` is closed in `L¹` using `isClosed_eq`.
3. Show that the property holds for all simple functions `s` in `L¹` space.
Typically, you need to convert various notions to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart, using lemmas
like `L1.integral_coe_eq_integral`.
4. Since simple functions are dense in `L¹`,
```
univ = closure {s simple}
= closure {s simple | ∫ s = ∫⁻ s⁺ - ∫⁻ s⁻} : the property holds for all simple functions
⊆ closure {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻}
= {f | ∫ f = ∫⁻ f⁺ - ∫⁻ f⁻} : closure of a closed set is itself
```
Use `isClosed_property` or `DenseRange.induction_on` for this argument.
## Notations
* `α →ₛ E` : simple functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/Integration`)
* `α →₁[μ] E` : functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable functions (defined in
`MeasureTheory/LpSpace`)
* `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` : simple functions in L1 space, i.e., equivalence classes of integrable simple
functions (defined in `MeasureTheory/SimpleFuncDense`)
* `∫ a, f a ∂μ` : integral of `f` with respect to a measure `μ`
* `∫ a, f a` : integral of `f` with respect to `volume`, the default measure on the ambient type
We also define notations for integral on a set, which are described in the file
`MeasureTheory/SetIntegral`.
Note : `ₛ` is typed using `\_s`. Sometimes it shows as a box if the font is missing.
## Tags
Bochner integral, simple function, function space, Lebesgue dominated convergence theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Differentiable
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace ENNReal EMetric
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α E F 𝕜 : Type*}
section WeightedSMul
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
/-- Given a set `s`, return the continuous linear map `fun x => (μ s).toReal • x`. The extension
of that set function through `setToL1` gives the Bochner integral of L1 functions. -/
def weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : F →L[ℝ] F :=
(μ s).toReal • ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) (x : F) :
weightedSMul μ s x = (μ s).toReal • x := by simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_apply MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_apply
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_zero_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} :
weightedSMul (0 : Measure α) = (0 : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1; simp [weightedSMul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_zero_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_zero_measure
@[simp]
theorem weightedSMul_empty {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
weightedSMul μ ∅ = (0 : F →L[ℝ] F) := by ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_empty MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_empty
theorem weightedSMul_add_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ ν : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (hνs : ν s ≠ ∞) :
(weightedSMul (μ + ν) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul ν s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
rw [Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.toReal_add hμs hνs, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_add_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_add_measure
theorem weightedSMul_smul_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (c : ℝ≥0∞) {s : Set α} :
(weightedSMul (c • μ) s : F →L[ℝ] F) = c.toReal • weightedSMul μ s := by
ext1 x
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, weightedSMul_apply]
push_cast
simp_rw [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, smul_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul_measure MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul_measure
theorem weightedSMul_congr (s t : Set α) (hst : μ s = μ t) :
(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr 2
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_congr MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_congr
theorem weightedSMul_null {s : Set α} (h_zero : μ s = 0) : (weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F) = 0 := by
ext1 x; rw [weightedSMul_apply, h_zero]; simp
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_null MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_null
theorem weightedSMul_union' (s t : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞)
(ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [add_apply, weightedSMul_apply,
measure_union (Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr h_inter) ht,
ENNReal.toReal_add hs_finite ht_finite, add_smul]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union' MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union'
@[nolint unusedArguments]
theorem weightedSMul_union (s t : Set α) (_hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hs_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht_finite : μ t ≠ ∞) (h_inter : s ∩ t = ∅) :
(weightedSMul μ (s ∪ t) : F →L[ℝ] F) = weightedSMul μ s + weightedSMul μ t :=
weightedSMul_union' s t ht hs_finite ht_finite h_inter
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_union MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_union
theorem weightedSMul_smul [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] (c : 𝕜)
(s : Set α) (x : F) : weightedSMul μ s (c • x) = c • weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply, smul_comm]
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_smul MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_smul
theorem norm_weightedSMul_le (s : Set α) : ‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ ≤ (μ s).toReal :=
calc
‖(weightedSMul μ s : F →L[ℝ] F)‖ = ‖(μ s).toReal‖ * ‖ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F‖ :=
norm_smul (μ s).toReal (ContinuousLinearMap.id ℝ F)
_ ≤ ‖(μ s).toReal‖ :=
((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left norm_id_le (norm_nonneg _)).trans (mul_one _).le)
_ = abs (μ s).toReal := Real.norm_eq_abs _
_ = (μ s).toReal := abs_eq_self.mpr ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.norm_weighted_smul_le MeasureTheory.norm_weightedSMul_le
theorem dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) :
DominatedFinMeasAdditive μ (weightedSMul μ : Set α → F →L[ℝ] F) 1 :=
⟨weightedSMul_union, fun s _ _ => (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le⟩
#align measure_theory.dominated_fin_meas_additive_weighted_smul MeasureTheory.dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul
theorem weightedSMul_nonneg (s : Set α) (x : ℝ) (hx : 0 ≤ x) : 0 ≤ weightedSMul μ s x := by
simp only [weightedSMul, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, coe_smul', _root_.id, coe_id', Pi.smul_apply]
exact mul_nonneg toReal_nonneg hx
#align measure_theory.weighted_smul_nonneg MeasureTheory.weightedSMul_nonneg
end WeightedSMul
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
namespace SimpleFunc
section PosPart
variable [LinearOrder E] [Zero E] [MeasurableSpace α]
/-- Positive part of a simple function. -/
def posPart (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
f.map fun b => max b 0
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function. -/
def negPart [Neg E] (f : α →ₛ E) : α →ₛ E :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart
theorem posPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (posPart f).map norm = posPart f := by
ext; rw [map_apply, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg]; exact le_max_right _ _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm
theorem negPart_map_norm (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : (negPart f).map norm = negPart f := by
rw [negPart]; exact posPart_map_norm _
#align measure_theory.simple_func.neg_part_map_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm
theorem posPart_sub_negPart (f : α →ₛ ℝ) : f.posPart - f.negPart = f := by
simp only [posPart, negPart]
ext a
rw [coe_sub]
exact max_zero_sub_eq_self (f a)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.pos_part_sub_neg_part MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.posPart_sub_negPart
end PosPart
section Integral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of simple functions
Define the Bochner integral of simple functions of the type `α →ₛ β` where `β` is a normed group,
and prove basic property of this integral.
-/
open Finset
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {G F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α}
/-- Bochner integral of simple functions whose codomain is a real `NormedSpace`.
This is equal to `∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x` (see `integral_eq`). -/
def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) : F :=
f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_def {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = f.setToSimpleFunc (weightedSMul μ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_def MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_def
theorem integral_eq {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α →ₛ F) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
simp [integral, setToSimpleFunc, weightedSMul_apply]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_sum_filter [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [integral_def, setToSimpleFunc_eq_sum_filter]; simp_rw [weightedSMul_apply]; congr
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_filter MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter
/-- The Bochner integral is equal to a sum over any set that includes `f.range` (except `0`). -/
theorem integral_eq_sum_of_subset [DecidablePred fun x : F => x ≠ 0] {f : α →ₛ F} {s : Finset F}
(hs : (f.range.filter fun x => x ≠ 0) ⊆ s) :
f.integral μ = ∑ x ∈ s, (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})).toReal • x := by
rw [SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_filter, Finset.sum_subset hs]
rintro x - hx; rw [Finset.mem_filter, not_and_or, Ne, Classical.not_not] at hx
-- Porting note: reordered for clarity
rcases hx.symm with (rfl | hx)
· simp
rw [SimpleFunc.mem_range] at hx
-- Porting note: added
simp only [Set.mem_range, not_exists] at hx
rw [preimage_eq_empty] <;> simp [Set.disjoint_singleton_left, hx]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_sum_of_subset MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_sum_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem integral_const {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (y : F) :
(const α y).integral μ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by
classical
calc
(const α y).integral μ = ∑ z ∈ {y}, (μ (const α y ⁻¹' {z})).toReal • z :=
integral_eq_sum_of_subset <| (filter_subset _ _).trans (range_const_subset _ _)
_ = (μ univ).toReal • y := by simp [Set.preimage] -- Porting note: added `Set.preimage`
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_const MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_const
@[simp]
theorem integral_piecewise_zero {m : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α →ₛ F) (μ : Measure α) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : (piecewise s hs f 0).integral μ = f.integral (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
refine (integral_eq_sum_of_subset ?_).trans
((sum_congr rfl fun y hy => ?_).trans (integral_eq_sum_filter _ _).symm)
· intro y hy
simp only [mem_filter, mem_range, coe_piecewise, coe_zero, piecewise_eq_indicator,
mem_range_indicator] at *
rcases hy with ⟨⟨rfl, -⟩ | ⟨x, -, rfl⟩, h₀⟩
exacts [(h₀ rfl).elim, ⟨Set.mem_range_self _, h₀⟩]
· dsimp
rw [Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, indicator_preimage_of_not_mem,
Measure.restrict_apply (f.measurableSet_preimage _)]
exact fun h₀ => (mem_filter.1 hy).2 (Eq.symm h₀)
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_piecewise_zero MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_piecewise_zero
/-- Calculate the integral of `g ∘ f : α →ₛ F`, where `f` is an integrable function from `α` to `E`
and `g` is a function from `E` to `F`. We require `g 0 = 0` so that `g ∘ f` is integrable. -/
theorem map_integral (f : α →ₛ E) (g : E → F) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
(f.map g).integral μ = ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) • g x :=
map_setToSimpleFunc _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.map_integral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.map_integral
/-- `SimpleFunc.integral` and `SimpleFunc.lintegral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion.
See `integral_eq_lintegral` for a simpler version. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral' {f : α →ₛ E} {g : E → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg0 : g 0 = 0)
(ht : ∀ b, g b ≠ ∞) :
(f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ g)).integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, g (f a) ∂μ) := by
have hf' : f.FinMeasSupp μ := integrable_iff_finMeasSupp.1 hf
simp only [← map_apply g f, lintegral_eq_lintegral]
rw [map_integral f _ hf, map_lintegral, ENNReal.toReal_sum]
· refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun b _ => ?_
-- Porting note: added `Function.comp_apply`
rw [smul_eq_mul, toReal_mul, mul_comm, Function.comp_apply]
· rintro a -
by_cases a0 : a = 0
· rw [a0, hg0, zero_mul]; exact WithTop.zero_ne_top
· apply mul_ne_top (ht a) (hf'.meas_preimage_singleton_ne_zero a0).ne
· simp [hg0]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral' MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral'
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem integral_congr {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) :
f.integral μ = g.integral μ :=
setToSimpleFunc_congr (weightedSMul μ) (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union hf h
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
/-- `SimpleFunc.bintegral` and `SimpleFunc.integral` agree when the integrand has type
`α →ₛ ℝ≥0∞`. But since `ℝ≥0∞` is not a `NormedSpace`, we need some form of coercion. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →ₛ ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
f.integral μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] f.map (ENNReal.toReal ∘ ENNReal.ofReal) :=
h_pos.mono fun a h => (ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h).symm
rw [← integral_eq_lintegral' hf]
exacts [integral_congr hf this, ENNReal.ofReal_zero, fun b => ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_add {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f + g) = integral μ f + integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_add _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_neg {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) : integral μ (-f) = -integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_neg _ weightedSMul_union hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_neg MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_neg
theorem integral_sub {f g : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
integral μ (f - g) = integral μ f - integral μ g :=
setToSimpleFunc_sub _ weightedSMul_union hf hg
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_sub MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_sub
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) {f : α →ₛ E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
integral μ (c • f) = c • integral μ f :=
setToSimpleFunc_smul _ weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c hf
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm (T : Set α → E →L[ℝ] F) {C : ℝ}
(hT_norm : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s < ∞ → ‖T s‖ ≤ C * (μ s).toReal) {f : α →ₛ E}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * (f.map norm).integral μ :=
calc
‖f.setToSimpleFunc T‖ ≤ C * ∑ x ∈ f.range, ENNReal.toReal (μ (f ⁻¹' {x})) * ‖x‖ :=
norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_sum_mul_norm_of_integrable T hT_norm f hf
_ = C * (f.map norm).integral μ := by
rw [map_integral f norm hf norm_zero]; simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_set_to_simple_func_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm
theorem norm_integral_le_integral_norm (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f μ) :
‖f.integral μ‖ ≤ (f.map norm).integral μ := by
refine (norm_setToSimpleFunc_le_integral_norm _ (fun s _ _ => ?_) hf).trans (one_mul _).le
exact (norm_weightedSMul_le s).trans (one_mul _).symm.le
#align measure_theory.simple_func.norm_integral_le_integral_norm MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_integral_norm
theorem integral_add_measure {ν} (f : α →ₛ E) (hf : Integrable f (μ + ν)) :
f.integral (μ + ν) = f.integral μ + f.integral ν := by
simp_rw [integral_def]
refine setToSimpleFunc_add_left'
(weightedSMul μ) (weightedSMul ν) (weightedSMul (μ + ν)) (fun s _ hμνs => ?_) hf
rw [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Measure.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, ENNReal.add_ne_top] at hμνs
rw [weightedSMul_add_measure _ _ hμνs.1 hμνs.2]
#align measure_theory.simple_func.integral_add_measure MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_add_measure
end Integral
end SimpleFunc
namespace L1
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false -- `L1`
open AEEqFun Lp.simpleFunc Lp
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
namespace SimpleFunc
theorem norm_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖f‖ = ((toSimpleFunc f).map norm).integral μ := by
rw [norm_eq_sum_mul f, (toSimpleFunc f).map_integral norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f) norm_zero]
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_eq_integral
section PosPart
/-- Positive part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
nonrec def posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
⟨Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ), by
rcases f with ⟨f, s, hsf⟩
use s.posPart
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Lp.coe_posPart, ← hsf, AEEqFun.posPart_mk,
SimpleFunc.coe_map, mk_eq_mk]
-- Porting note: added
simp [SimpleFunc.posPart, Function.comp, EventuallyEq.rfl] ⟩
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart
/-- Negative part of a simple function in L1 space. -/
def negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ :=
posPart (-f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_posPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (posPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_pos_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_posPart
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_negPart (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : (negPart f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) = Lp.negPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.coe_neg_part MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.coe_negPart
end PosPart
section SimpleFuncIntegral
/-!
### The Bochner integral of `L1`
Define the Bochner integral on `α →₁ₛ[μ] E` by extension from the simple functions `α →₁ₛ[μ] E`,
and prove basic properties of this integral. -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] {F' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F']
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space. -/
def integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : E :=
(toSimpleFunc f).integral μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral
theorem integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_integral
nonrec theorem integral_eq_lintegral {f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ} (h_pos : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc f) :
integral f = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((toSimpleFunc f) a) ∂μ) := by
rw [integral, SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h_pos]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_lintegral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_lintegral
theorem integral_eq_setToL1S (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral f = setToL1S (weightedSMul μ) f := rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_set_to_L1s MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_setToL1S
nonrec theorem integral_congr {f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E} (h : toSimpleFunc f =ᵐ[μ] toSimpleFunc g) :
integral f = integral g :=
SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f) h
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_congr MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_congr
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g :=
setToL1S_add _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union _ _
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_add
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f :=
setToL1S_smul _ (fun _ _ => weightedSMul_null) weightedSMul_union weightedSMul_smul c f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_smul
theorem norm_integral_le_norm (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ := by
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral]
exact (toSimpleFunc f).norm_integral_le_integral_norm (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_integral_le_norm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_integral_le_norm
variable {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable (α E μ 𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
def integralCLM' : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous ⟨⟨integral, integral_add⟩, integral_smul⟩ 1 fun f =>
le_trans (norm_integral_le_norm _) <| by rw [one_mul]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM'
/-- The Bochner integral over simple functions in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁ₛ[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' α E ℝ μ
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integralCLM
variable {α E μ 𝕜}
local notation "Integral" => integralCLM α E μ
open ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖Integral‖ ≤ 1 :=
-- Porting note: Old proof was `LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one _`
LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ zero_le_one (fun f => by
rw [one_mul]
exact norm_integral_le_norm f)
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.norm_Integral_le_one
section PosPart
theorem posPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (posPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).posPart := by
have eq : ∀ a, (toSimpleFunc f).posPart a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := fun a => rfl
have ae_eq : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, toSimpleFunc (posPart f) a = max ((toSimpleFunc f) a) 0 := by
filter_upwards [toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun (posPart f), Lp.coeFn_posPart (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ),
toSimpleFunc_eq_toFun f] with _ _ h₂ h₃
convert h₂ using 1
-- Porting note: added
rw [h₃]
refine ae_eq.mono fun a h => ?_
rw [h, eq]
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.pos_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.posPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem negPart_toSimpleFunc (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) :
toSimpleFunc (negPart f) =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc f).negPart := by
rw [SimpleFunc.negPart, MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.negPart]
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc (-f), neg_toSimpleFunc f]
intro a h₁ h₂
rw [h₁]
show max _ _ = max _ _
rw [h₂]
rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.neg_part_to_simple_func MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.negPart_toSimpleFunc
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) : integral f = ‖posPart f‖ - ‖negPart f‖ := by
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₁ : (toSimpleFunc f).posPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [posPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.posPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
-- Convert things in `L¹` to their `SimpleFunc` counterpart
have ae_eq₂ : (toSimpleFunc f).negPart =ᵐ[μ] (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm := by
filter_upwards [negPart_toSimpleFunc f] with _ h
rw [SimpleFunc.map_apply, h]
conv_lhs => rw [← SimpleFunc.negPart_map_norm, SimpleFunc.map_apply]
rw [integral, norm_eq_integral, norm_eq_integral, ← SimpleFunc.integral_sub]
· show (toSimpleFunc f).integral μ =
((toSimpleFunc (posPart f)).map norm - (toSimpleFunc (negPart f)).map norm).integral μ
apply MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc.integral_congr (SimpleFunc.integrable f)
filter_upwards [ae_eq₁, ae_eq₂] with _ h₁ h₂
show _ = _ - _
rw [← h₁, ← h₂]
have := (toSimpleFunc f).posPart_sub_negPart
conv_lhs => rw [← this]
rfl
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).pos_part.congr ae_eq₁
· exact (SimpleFunc.integrable f).neg_part.congr ae_eq₂
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end SimpleFuncIntegral
end SimpleFunc
open SimpleFunc
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ _ _ _ μ _
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E]
[NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace E]
section IntegrationInL1
attribute [local instance] simpleFunc.normedSpace
open ContinuousLinearMap
variable (𝕜)
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map. -/
nonrec def integralCLM' : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[𝕜] E :=
(integralCLM' α E 𝕜 μ).extend (coeToLp α E 𝕜) (simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top)
simpleFunc.uniformInducing
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm' MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM'
variable {𝕜}
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space as a continuous linear map over ℝ. -/
def integralCLM : (α →₁[μ] E) →L[ℝ] E :=
integralCLM' ℝ
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_clm MeasureTheory.L1.integralCLM
-- Porting note: added `(E := E)` in several places below.
/-- The Bochner integral in L1 space -/
irreducible_def integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : E :=
integralCLM (E := E) f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral
theorem integral_eq (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral f = integralCLM (E := E) f := by
simp only [integral]
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToL1 (f : α →₁[μ] E) :
integral f = setToL1 (E := E) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_set_to_L1 MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_setToL1
@[norm_cast]
theorem SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral (f : α →₁ₛ[μ] E) :
L1.integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) = SimpleFunc.integral f := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral]
exact setToL1_eq_setToL1SCLM (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
#align measure_theory.L1.simple_func.integral_L1_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.SimpleFunc.integral_L1_eq_integral
variable (α E)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : integral (0 : α →₁[μ] E) = 0 := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_zero integralCLM
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_zero MeasureTheory.L1.integral_zero
variable {α E}
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_add (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f + g) = integral f + integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_add integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_add MeasureTheory.L1.integral_add
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (-f) = -integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_neg integralCLM f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_neg MeasureTheory.L1.integral_neg
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_sub (f g : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (f - g) = integral f - integral g := by
simp only [integral]
exact map_sub integralCLM f g
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_sub
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α →₁[μ] E) : integral (c • f) = c • integral f := by
simp only [integral]
show (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) (c • f) = c • (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) f
exact map_smul (integralCLM' (E := E) 𝕜) c f
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_smul MeasureTheory.L1.integral_smul
local notation "Integral" => @integralCLM α E _ _ μ _ _
local notation "sIntegral" => @SimpleFunc.integralCLM α E _ _ μ _
theorem norm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ ≤ 1 :=
norm_setToL1_le (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) zero_le_one
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one MeasureTheory.L1.norm_Integral_le_one
theorem nnnorm_Integral_le_one : ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_Integral_le_one
theorem norm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
calc
‖integral f‖ = ‖integralCLM (E := E) f‖ := by simp only [integral]
_ ≤ ‖integralCLM (α := α) (E := E) (μ := μ)‖ * ‖f‖ := le_opNorm _ _
_ ≤ 1 * ‖f‖ := mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right norm_Integral_le_one <| norm_nonneg _
_ = ‖f‖ := one_mul _
#align measure_theory.L1.norm_integral_le MeasureTheory.L1.norm_integral_le
theorem nnnorm_integral_le (f : α →₁[μ] E) : ‖integral f‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ :=
norm_integral_le f
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] E => integral f := by
simp only [integral]
exact L1.integralCLM.continuous
#align measure_theory.L1.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.L1.continuous_integral
section PosPart
theorem integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub (f : α →₁[μ] ℝ) :
integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖ := by
-- Use `isClosed_property` and `isClosed_eq`
refine @isClosed_property _ _ _ ((↑) : (α →₁ₛ[μ] ℝ) → α →₁[μ] ℝ)
(fun f : α →₁[μ] ℝ => integral f = ‖Lp.posPart f‖ - ‖Lp.negPart f‖)
(simpleFunc.denseRange one_ne_top) (isClosed_eq ?_ ?_) ?_ f
· simp only [integral]
exact cont _
· refine Continuous.sub (continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_posPart)
(continuous_norm.comp Lp.continuous_negPart)
-- Show that the property holds for all simple functions in the `L¹` space.
· intro s
norm_cast
exact SimpleFunc.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_norm_pos_part_sub MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub
end PosPart
end IntegrationInL1
end L1
/-!
## The Bochner integral on functions
Define the Bochner integral on functions generally to be the `L1` Bochner integral, for integrable
functions, and 0 otherwise; prove its basic properties.
-/
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [hE : CompleteSpace E] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F]
{G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℝ G]
section
open scoped Classical
/-- The Bochner integral -/
irreducible_def integral {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (f : α → G) : G :=
if _ : CompleteSpace G then
if hf : Integrable f μ then L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) else 0
else 0
#align measure_theory.integral MeasureTheory.integral
end
/-! In the notation for integrals, an expression like `∫ x, g ‖x‖ ∂μ` will not be parsed correctly,
and needs parentheses. We do not set the binding power of `r` to `0`, because then
`∫ x, f x = 0` will be parsed incorrectly. -/
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral μ r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => integral volume f) => r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => integral (Measure.restrict μ s) r
@[inherit_doc MeasureTheory.integral]
notation3 "∫ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => integral (Measure.restrict volume s) f) => r
section Properties
open ContinuousLinearMap MeasureTheory.SimpleFunc
variable {f g : α → E} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem integral_eq (f : α → E) (hf : Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = L1.integral (hf.toL1 f) := by
simp [integral, hE, hf]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq MeasureTheory.integral_eq
theorem integral_eq_setToFun (f : α → E) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = setToFun μ (weightedSMul μ) (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f := by
simp only [integral, hE, L1.integral]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_set_to_fun MeasureTheory.integral_eq_setToFun
theorem L1.integral_eq_integral (f : α →₁[μ] E) : L1.integral f = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
simp only [integral, L1.integral, integral_eq_setToFun]
exact (L1.setToFun_eq_setToL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f).symm
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_eq_integral
theorem integral_undef {f : α → G} (h : ¬Integrable f μ) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp [integral, hG, h]
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_undef MeasureTheory.integral_undef
theorem Integrable.of_integral_ne_zero {f : α → G} (h : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≠ 0) : Integrable f μ :=
Not.imp_symm integral_undef h
theorem integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → G} (h : ¬AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 :=
integral_undef <| not_and_of_not_left _ h
#align measure_theory.integral_non_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable
variable (α G)
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero : ∫ _ : α, (0 : G) ∂μ = 0 := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_zero (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_zero MeasureTheory.integral_zero
@[simp]
theorem integral_zero' : integral μ (0 : α → G) = 0 :=
integral_zero α G
#align measure_theory.integral_zero' MeasureTheory.integral_zero'
variable {α G}
theorem integrable_of_integral_eq_one {f : α → ℝ} (h : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1) : Integrable f μ :=
.of_integral_ne_zero <| h ▸ one_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one MeasureTheory.integrable_of_integral_eq_one
theorem integral_add {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a + g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_add (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_add MeasureTheory.integral_add
theorem integral_add' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f + g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ + ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_add hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_add' MeasureTheory.integral_add'
theorem integral_finset_sum {ι} (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → G} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Integrable (f i) μ) :
∫ a, ∑ i ∈ s, f i a ∂μ = ∑ i ∈ s, ∫ a, f i a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_finset_sum (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul _) s hf
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_finset_sum MeasureTheory.integral_finset_sum
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_neg (f : α → G) : ∫ a, -f a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_neg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_neg MeasureTheory.integral_neg
theorem integral_neg' (f : α → G) : ∫ a, (-f) a ∂μ = -∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_neg f
#align measure_theory.integral_neg' MeasureTheory.integral_neg'
theorem integral_sub {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, f a - g a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_sub (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf hg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_sub MeasureTheory.integral_sub
theorem integral_sub' {f g : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∫ a, (f - g) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ - ∫ a, g a ∂μ :=
integral_sub hf hg
#align measure_theory.integral_sub' MeasureTheory.integral_sub'
@[integral_simps]
theorem integral_smul [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 G] (c : 𝕜) (f : α → G) :
∫ a, c • f a ∂μ = c • ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_smul (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) weightedSMul_smul c f
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_smul MeasureTheory.integral_smul
theorem integral_mul_left {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, r * f a ∂μ = r * ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_smul r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_left MeasureTheory.integral_mul_left
theorem integral_mul_right {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a * r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) * r := by
simp only [mul_comm]; exact integral_mul_left r f
#align measure_theory.integral_mul_right MeasureTheory.integral_mul_right
theorem integral_div {L : Type*} [RCLike L] (r : L) (f : α → L) :
∫ a, f a / r ∂μ = (∫ a, f a ∂μ) / r := by
simpa only [← div_eq_mul_inv] using integral_mul_right r⁻¹ f
#align measure_theory.integral_div MeasureTheory.integral_div
theorem integral_congr_ae {f g : α → G} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_congr_ae (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) h
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.integral_congr_ae MeasureTheory.integral_congr_ae
-- Porting note: `nolint simpNF` added because simplify fails on left-hand side
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
theorem L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, (hf.toL1 f) a ∂μ = ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [MeasureTheory.integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact setToFun_toL1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) hf
· simp [MeasureTheory.integral, hG]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral MeasureTheory.L1.integral_of_fun_eq_integral
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_integral : Continuous fun f : α →₁[μ] G => ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_integral MeasureTheory.continuous_integral
theorem norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm (f : α → G) :
‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖ ≤ ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· by_cases hf : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq f hf, ← Integrable.norm_toL1_eq_lintegral_norm f hf]
exact L1.norm_integral_le _
· rw [integral_undef hf, norm_zero]; exact toReal_nonneg
· simp [integral, hG]
#align measure_theory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm MeasureTheory.norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm
theorem ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm (f : α → G) :
(‖∫ a, f a ∂μ‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_of_le_toReal
exact norm_integral_le_lintegral_norm f
#align measure_theory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm MeasureTheory.ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm
theorem integral_eq_zero_of_ae {f : α → G} (hf : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ = 0 := by
simp [integral_congr_ae hf, integral_zero]
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_of_ae
/-- If `f` has finite integral, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G}
(hf : HasFiniteIntegral f μ) {l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, ← NNReal.coe_zero, NNReal.tendsto_coe, ← ENNReal.tendsto_coe,
ENNReal.coe_zero]
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds
(tendsto_set_lintegral_zero (ne_of_lt hf) hs) (fun i => zero_le _)
fun i => ennnorm_integral_le_lintegral_ennnorm _
#align measure_theory.has_finite_integral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
HasFiniteIntegral.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `f` is integrable, then `∫ x in s, f x ∂μ` is absolutely continuous in `s`: it tends
to zero as `μ s` tends to zero. -/
theorem Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero {ι} {f : α → G} (hf : Integrable f μ)
{l : Filter ι} {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x in s i, f x ∂μ) l (𝓝 0) :=
hf.2.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero hs
#align measure_theory.integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero MeasureTheory.Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias Integrable.tendsto_set_integral_nhds_zero :=
Integrable.tendsto_setIntegral_nhds_zero
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
theorem tendsto_integral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ)
(hF : Tendsto (fun i => ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i => ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 <| ∫ x, f x ∂μ) := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact tendsto_setToFun_of_L1 (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ) f hfi hFi hF
· simp [integral, hG, tendsto_const_nhds]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align measure_theory.tendsto_integral_of_L1 MeasureTheory.tendsto_integral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_integral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G} {l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ x, ‖F i x - f x‖₊ ∂μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_integral_of_L1 f hfi.restrict ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [hFi] with i hi using hi.restrict
· simp_rw [← snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm] at hF ⊢
exact tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le tendsto_const_nhds hF (fun _ ↦ zero_le')
(fun _ ↦ snorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1 := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1
/-- If `F i → f` in `L1`, then `∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ → ∫ x in s, f x ∂μ`. -/
lemma tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1' {ι} (f : α → G) (hfi : Integrable f μ) {F : ι → α → G}
{l : Filter ι}
(hFi : ∀ᶠ i in l, Integrable (F i) μ) (hF : Tendsto (fun i ↦ snorm (F i - f) 1 μ) l (𝓝 0))
(s : Set α) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ x in s, F i x ∂μ) l (𝓝 (∫ x in s, f x ∂μ)) := by
refine tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1 f hfi hFi ?_ s
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm, Pi.sub_apply] at hF
exact hF
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias tendsto_set_integral_of_L1' := tendsto_setIntegral_of_L1'
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [FirstCountableTopology X]
theorem continuousWithinAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => F x a) s x₀) :
ContinuousWithinAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousWithinAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousWithinAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_within_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousWithinAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousAt_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {x₀ : X} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousAt (fun x => F x a) x₀) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) x₀ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousAt_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousAt_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_at_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousAt_of_dominated
theorem continuousOn_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ} {s : Set X}
(hF_meas : ∀ x ∈ s, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ)
(h_bound : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a) (bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ)
(h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ContinuousOn (fun x => F x a) s) :
ContinuousOn (fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ) s := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuousOn_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuousOn_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_on_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuousOn_of_dominated
theorem continuous_of_dominated {F : X → α → G} {bound : α → ℝ}
(hF_meas : ∀ x, AEStronglyMeasurable (F x) μ) (h_bound : ∀ x, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖F x a‖ ≤ bound a)
(bound_integrable : Integrable bound μ) (h_cont : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Continuous fun x => F x a) :
Continuous fun x => ∫ a, F x a ∂μ := by
by_cases hG : CompleteSpace G
· simp only [integral, hG, L1.integral]
exact continuous_setToFun_of_dominated (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
hF_meas h_bound bound_integrable h_cont
· simp [integral, hG, continuous_const]
#align measure_theory.continuous_of_dominated MeasureTheory.continuous_of_dominated
/-- The Bochner integral of a real-valued function `f : α → ℝ` is the difference between the
integral of the positive part of `f` and the integral of the negative part of `f`. -/
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ =
ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (f a) ∂μ) - ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, .ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) := by
let f₁ := hf.toL1 f
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₁ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.posPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_posPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
rw [Real.nnnorm_of_nonneg (le_max_right _ _)]
rw [Real.coe_toNNReal', NNReal.coe_mk]
-- Go to the `L¹` space
have eq₂ : ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ) = ‖Lp.negPart f₁‖ := by
rw [L1.norm_def]
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [Lp.coeFn_negPart f₁, hf.coeFn_toL1] with _ h₁ h₂
rw [h₁, h₂, ENNReal.ofReal]
congr 1
apply NNReal.eq
simp only [Real.coe_toNNReal', coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_neg]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonpos (min_le_right _ _), ← max_neg_neg, neg_zero]
rw [eq₁, eq₂, integral, dif_pos, dif_pos]
exact L1.integral_eq_norm_posPart_sub _
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part
theorem integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f)
(hfm : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ) := by
by_cases hfi : Integrable f μ
· rw [integral_eq_lintegral_pos_part_sub_lintegral_neg_part hfi]
have h_min : ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal (-f a) ∂μ = 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· refine hf.mono ?_
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
intro a h
simp only [h, neg_nonpos, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfm.aemeasurable.neg
rw [h_min, zero_toReal, _root_.sub_zero]
· rw [integral_undef hfi]
simp_rw [Integrable, hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_norm, lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, true_and_iff,
Classical.not_not] at hfi
have : ∫⁻ a : α, ENNReal.ofReal (f a) ∂μ = ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr_ae (hf.mono fun a h => ?_)
dsimp only
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg h]
rw [this, hfi]; rfl
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ = ENNReal.toReal (∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ) := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hf.norm]
· simp_rw [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
· filter_upwards; simp_rw [Pi.zero_apply, norm_nonneg, imp_true_iff]
#align measure_theory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup P] {f : α → P}
(hf : Integrable f μ) : ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
rw [integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hf.aestronglyMeasurable,
ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (lt_top_iff_ne_top.mp hf.2)]
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
theorem integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (f a) : ℝ) ∂μ - ∫ a, (Real.toNNReal (-f a) : ℝ) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_sub hf.real_toNNReal]
· simp
· exact hf.neg.real_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part MeasureTheory.integral_eq_integral_pos_part_sub_integral_neg_part
theorem integral_nonneg_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ := by
have A : CompleteSpace ℝ := by infer_instance
simp only [integral_def, A, L1.integral_def, dite_true, ge_iff_le]
exact setToFun_nonneg (dominatedFinMeasAdditive_weightedSMul μ)
(fun s _ _ => weightedSMul_nonneg s) hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg_of_ae
theorem lintegral_coe_eq_integral (f : α → ℝ≥0) (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ) :
∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f a ∂μ) := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => (f x).coe_nonneg)
hfi.aestronglyMeasurable, ← ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq]
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_toReal]
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
convert hfi.hasFiniteIntegral
-- Porting note: `convert` no longer unfolds `HasFiniteIntegral`
simp_rw [HasFiniteIntegral, NNReal.nnnorm_eq]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_eq_integral
theorem ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal {f : α → ℝ} (hfi : Integrable f μ) (f_nn : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) :
ENNReal.ofReal (∫ x, f x ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ] (‖f ·‖) := f_nn.mono fun _x hx ↦ (abs_of_nonneg hx).symm
simp_rw [integral_congr_ae this, ofReal_integral_norm_eq_lintegral_nnnorm hfi,
← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
exact lintegral_congr_ae (this.symm.fun_comp ENNReal.ofReal)
#align measure_theory.of_real_integral_eq_lintegral_of_real MeasureTheory.ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal
theorem integral_toReal {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hfm : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < ∞) :
∫ a, (f a).toReal ∂μ = (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ).toReal := by
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae _ hfm.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable,
lintegral_congr_ae (ofReal_toReal_ae_eq hf)]
exact eventually_of_forall fun x => ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.integral_to_real MeasureTheory.integral_toReal
theorem lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} (hfi : Integrable (fun x => (f x : ℝ)) μ)
{b : ℝ≥0} : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b ↔ ∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral f hfi, ENNReal.ofReal, ENNReal.coe_le_coe,
Real.toNNReal_le_iff_le_coe]
#align measure_theory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le MeasureTheory.lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le
theorem integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le {f : α → ℝ≥0} {b : ℝ≥0} (h : ∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ ≤ b) :
∫ a, (f a : ℝ) ∂μ ≤ b := by
by_cases hf : Integrable (fun a => (f a : ℝ)) μ
· exact (lintegral_coe_le_coe_iff_integral_le hf).1 h
· rw [integral_undef hf]; exact b.2
#align measure_theory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le MeasureTheory.integral_coe_le_of_lintegral_coe_le
theorem integral_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) : 0 ≤ ∫ a, f a ∂μ :=
integral_nonneg_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_nonneg
theorem integral_nonpos_of_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ᵐ[μ] 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 := by
have hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] -f := hf.mono fun a h => by rwa [Pi.neg_apply, Pi.zero_apply, neg_nonneg]
have : 0 ≤ ∫ a, -f a ∂μ := integral_nonneg_of_ae hf
rwa [integral_neg, neg_nonneg] at this
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos_of_ae MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos_of_ae
theorem integral_nonpos {f : α → ℝ} (hf : f ≤ 0) : ∫ a, f a ∂μ ≤ 0 :=
integral_nonpos_of_ae <| eventually_of_forall hf
#align measure_theory.integral_nonpos MeasureTheory.integral_nonpos
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi.1, ENNReal.toReal_eq_zero_iff,
← ENNReal.not_lt_top, ← hasFiniteIntegral_iff_ofReal hf, hfi.2, not_true_eq_false, or_false_iff]
-- Porting note: split into parts, to make `rw` and `simp` work
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff']
· rw [← hf.le_iff_eq, Filter.EventuallyEq, Filter.EventuallyLE]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, ofReal_eq_zero]
· exact (ENNReal.measurable_ofReal.comp_aemeasurable hfi.1.aemeasurable)
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
∫ x, f x ∂μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
lemma integral_eq_iff_of_ae_le {f g : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Integrable g μ) (hfg : f ≤ᵐ[μ] g) :
∫ a, f a ∂μ = ∫ a, g a ∂μ ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] g := by
refine ⟨fun h_le ↦ EventuallyEq.symm ?_, fun h ↦ integral_congr_ae h⟩
rw [← sub_ae_eq_zero,
← integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae ((sub_nonneg_ae _ _).mpr hfg) (hg.sub hf)]
simpa [Pi.sub_apply, integral_sub hg hf, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) := by
simp_rw [(integral_nonneg_of_ae hf).lt_iff_ne, pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, @eq_comm ℝ 0,
integral_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg_ae hf hfi, Filter.EventuallyEq, ae_iff, Pi.zero_apply,
Function.support]
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae
theorem integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg {f : α → ℝ} (hf : 0 ≤ f) (hfi : Integrable f μ) :
(0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ) ↔ 0 < μ (Function.support f) :=
integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall hf) hfi
#align measure_theory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg MeasureTheory.integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg
lemma integral_exp_pos {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ} [hμ : NeZero μ]
(hf : Integrable (fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) μ) :
0 < ∫ x, Real.exp (f x) ∂μ := by
rw [integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg (fun x ↦ (Real.exp_pos _).le) hf]
suffices (Function.support fun x ↦ Real.exp (f x)) = Set.univ by simp [this, hμ.out]
ext1 x
simp only [Function.mem_support, ne_eq, (Real.exp_pos _).ne', not_false_eq_true, Set.mem_univ]
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Monotone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
-- switch from the Bochner to the Lebesgue integral
let f' := fun n x ↦ f n x - f 0 x
have hf'_nonneg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, 0 ≤ f' n x := by
filter_upwards [h_mono] with a ha n
simp [f', ha (zero_le n)]
have hf'_meas : ∀ n, Integrable (f' n) μ := fun n ↦ (hf n).sub (hf 0)
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f' n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, (F - f 0) x ∂μ)) by
simp_rw [integral_sub (hf _) (hf _), integral_sub' hF (hf 0), tendsto_sub_const_iff] at this
exact this
have hF_ge : 0 ≤ᵐ[μ] fun x ↦ (F - f 0) x := by
filter_upwards [h_tendsto, h_mono] with x hx_tendsto hx_mono
simp only [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.sub_apply, sub_nonneg]
exact ge_of_tendsto' hx_tendsto (fun n ↦ hx_mono (zero_le _))
rw [ae_all_iff] at hf'_nonneg
simp_rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (hf'_nonneg _) (hf'_meas _).1]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae hF_ge (hF.1.sub (hf 0).1)]
have h_cont := ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal (x := ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ((F - f 0) a) ∂μ) ?_
swap
· rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal (hF.sub (hf 0)) hF_ge]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
refine h_cont.tendsto.comp ?_
-- use the result for the Lebesgue integral
refine lintegral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun n ↦ ((hf n).sub (hf 0)).aemeasurable.ennreal_ofReal
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [f', tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel]
exact hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
simp only [Pi.sub_apply]
exact Tendsto.sub hx tendsto_const_nhds
/-- Monotone convergence theorem for real-valued functions and Bochner integrals -/
lemma integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF : Integrable F μ) (h_mono : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Antitone fun n ↦ f n x)
(h_tendsto : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n ↦ f n x) atTop (𝓝 (F x))) :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, F x ∂μ)) := by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, -F x ∂μ)) by
suffices Tendsto (fun n ↦ ∫ x, - -f n x ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ x, - -F x ∂μ)) by
simpa [neg_neg] using this
convert this.neg <;> rw [integral_neg]
refine integral_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf n).neg) hF.neg ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [h_mono] with x hx n m hnm using neg_le_neg_iff.mpr <| hx hnm
· filter_upwards [h_tendsto] with x hx using hx.neg
/-- If a monotone sequence of functions has an upper bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the upper bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the upper bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f i a ≤ F a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
-- reduce to the `ℝ≥0∞` case
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun n a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (f n a - f 0 a)
let F' : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun a ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (F a - f 0 a)
have hf'_int_eq : ∀ i, ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, f i a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
intro i
unfold_let f'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub (hf_int i) (hf_int 0)]
· exact (hf_int i).sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a h_mono
simp [h_mono (zero_le i)]
have hF'_int_eq : ∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ = ENNReal.ofReal (∫ a, F a ∂μ - ∫ a, f 0 a ∂μ) := by
unfold_let F'
rw [← ofReal_integral_eq_lintegral_ofReal, integral_sub hF_int (hf_int 0)]
· exact hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a h_bound
simp [h_bound 0]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫⁻ a, f' i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫⁻ a, F' a ∂μ)) := by
simp_rw [hf'_int_eq, hF'_int_eq]
refine (ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.tendsto _).comp ?_
rwa [tendsto_sub_const_iff]
have h_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Monotone (fun i ↦ f' i a) := by
filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha_mono i j hij
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp [ha_mono hij]
have h_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, f' i a ≤ F' a := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha_bound i
refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_
simp only [tsub_le_iff_right, sub_add_cancel, ha_bound i]
-- use the corresponding lemma for `ℝ≥0∞`
have h := tendsto_of_lintegral_tendsto_of_monotone ?_ h_tendsto h_mono h_bound ?_
rotate_left
· exact (hF_int.1.aemeasurable.sub (hf_int 0).1.aemeasurable).ennreal_ofReal
· exact ((lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_nnnorm _).trans_lt (hF_int.sub (hf_int 0)).2).ne
filter_upwards [h, hf_mono, hf_bound] with a ha ha_mono ha_bound
have h1 : (fun i ↦ f i a) = fun i ↦ (f' i a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let f'
ext i
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_mono (zero_le i)]
have h2 : F a = (F' a).toReal + f 0 a := by
unfold_let F'
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal]
· abel
· simp [ha_bound 0]
rw [h1, h2]
refine Filter.Tendsto.add ?_ tendsto_const_nhds
exact (ENNReal.continuousAt_toReal ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top).tendsto.comp ha
/-- If an antitone sequence of functions has a lower bound and the sequence of integrals of these
functions tends to the integral of the lower bound, then the sequence of functions converges
almost everywhere to the lower bound. -/
lemma tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_antitone {μ : Measure α} {f : ℕ → α → ℝ} {F : α → ℝ}
(hf_int : ∀ n, Integrable (f n) μ) (hF_int : Integrable F μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun i ↦ ∫ a, f i a ∂μ) atTop (𝓝 (∫ a, F a ∂μ)))
(hf_mono : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Antitone (fun i ↦ f i a))
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, F a ≤ f i a) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f i a) atTop (𝓝 (F a)) := by
let f' : ℕ → α → ℝ := fun i a ↦ - f i a
let F' : α → ℝ := fun a ↦ - F a
suffices ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, Tendsto (fun i ↦ f' i a) atTop (𝓝 (F' a)) by
filter_upwards [this] with a ha_tendsto
convert ha_tendsto.neg
· simp [f']
· simp [F']
refine tendsto_of_integral_tendsto_of_monotone (fun n ↦ (hf_int n).neg) hF_int.neg ?_ ?_ ?_
· convert hf_tendsto.neg
· rw [integral_neg]
· rw [integral_neg]
· filter_upwards [hf_mono] with a ha i j hij
simp [f', ha hij]
· filter_upwards [hf_bound] with a ha i
simp [f', F', ha i]
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Bochner.lean | 1,428 | 1,433 | theorem L1.norm_eq_integral_norm (f : α →₁[μ] H) : ‖f‖ = ∫ a, ‖f a‖ ∂μ := by |
simp only [snorm, snorm', ENNReal.one_toReal, ENNReal.rpow_one, Lp.norm_def, if_false,
ENNReal.one_ne_top, one_ne_zero, _root_.div_one]
rw [integral_eq_lintegral_of_nonneg_ae (eventually_of_forall (by simp [norm_nonneg]))
(Lp.aestronglyMeasurable f).norm]
simp [ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
#align nat.floor_pos Nat.floor_pos
theorem pos_of_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
(le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left fun ha => lt_irrefl 0 <| by rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha] at h
#align nat.pos_of_floor_pos Nat.pos_of_floor_pos
theorem lt_of_lt_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(Nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le <| floor_le (pos_of_floor_pos <| (Nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h).le
#align nat.lt_of_lt_floor Nat.lt_of_lt_floor
theorem floor_le_of_le (h : a ≤ n) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ n :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 lt_of_lt_floor h
#align nat.floor_le_of_le Nat.floor_le_of_le
theorem floor_le_one_of_le_one (h : a ≤ 1) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ 1 :=
floor_le_of_le <| h.trans_eq <| Nat.cast_one.symm
#align nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← lt_one_iff, ← @cast_one α]
exact floor_lt' Nat.one_ne_zero
#align nat.floor_eq_zero Nat.floor_eq_zero
theorem floor_eq_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff ha, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt ha, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff Nat.floor_eq_iff
theorem floor_eq_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff' hn, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt' (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n),
Nat.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff' Nat.floor_eq_iff'
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℕ) : ∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), ⌊a⌋₊ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
(floor_eq_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h₀).mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℕ) :
∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = n :=
fun x hx => mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico' Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_zero : (floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iio 1 :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_floor_zero Nat.preimage_floor_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(n:α)`
theorem preimage_floor_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ico (n:α) (n + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff' hn
#align nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection (ceil : α → ℕ) (↑) :=
FloorSemiring.gc_ceil
#align nat.gc_ceil_coe Nat.gc_ceil_coe
@[simp]
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
gc_ceil_coe _ _
#align nat.ceil_le Nat.ceil_le
theorem lt_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align nat.lt_ceil Nat.lt_ceil
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : n + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a := by
rw [← Nat.lt_ceil, Nat.add_one_le_iff]
#align nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add 1, Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.one_le_ceil_iff Nat.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_le.1 le_rfl
#align nat.le_ceil Nat.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α] (z : ℤ) :
⌈(z : α)⌉₊ = z.toNat :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
simp only [ceil_le, Int.toNat_le]
norm_cast
#align nat.ceil_int_cast Nat.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, cast_le]
#align nat.ceil_nat_cast Nat.ceil_natCast
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℕ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align nat.ceil_mono Nat.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ ⌈y⌉₊ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_zero Nat.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_one Nat.ceil_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌉₊ = n := ceil_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by rw [← Nat.le_zero, ceil_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_eq_zero Nat.ceil_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_pos Nat.ceil_pos
theorem lt_of_ceil_lt (h : ⌈a⌉₊ < n) : a < n :=
(le_ceil a).trans_lt (Nat.cast_lt.2 h)
#align nat.lt_of_ceil_lt Nat.lt_of_ceil_lt
theorem le_of_ceil_le (h : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n) : a ≤ n :=
(le_ceil a).trans (Nat.cast_le.2 h)
#align nat.le_of_ceil_le Nat.le_of_ceil_le
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact cast_le.1 ((floor_le ha).trans <| le_ceil _)
#align nat.floor_le_ceil Nat.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {a b : α} (h : a < b) (h' : 0 < b) : ⌊a⌋₊ < ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 a with (ha | ha)
· rw [floor_lt ha]
exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _)
· rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, lt_ceil, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
theorem ceil_eq_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌈a⌉₊ = n ↔ ↑(n - 1) < a ∧ a ≤ n := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← not_le, ← ceil_le, not_le,
tsub_lt_iff_right (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)), Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.ceil_eq_iff Nat.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_zero : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iic 0 :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_ceil_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(↑(n - 1))`
theorem preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ioc (↑(n - 1) : α) n :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff hn
#align nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Intervals -/
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioo Nat.preimage_Ioo
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Ico Nat.preimage_Ico
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor_iff, hb, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioc Nat.preimage_Ioc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, hb, le_floor_iff]
#align nat.preimage_Icc Nat.preimage_Icc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioi Nat.preimage_Ioi
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align nat.preimage_Ici Nat.preimage_Ici
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Iio Nat.preimage_Iio
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [le_floor_iff, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Iic Nat.preimage_Iic
theorem floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by
rw [le_floor_iff (add_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg)]
obtain hb | hb := le_total n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right,
le_floor_iff ha]
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_left_comm _ b, add_left_comm _ (b : α)]
refine iff_of_true ?_ le_self_add
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| ha.trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_right d.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_add_nat Nat.floor_add_nat
theorem floor_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a + 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_nat ha 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.floor_add_one Nat.floor_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat ha n
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
⌊a - n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha, floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le (ha.trans n.cast_nonneg)), zero_tsub]
rcases le_total a n with h | h
· rw [floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le h), eq_comm, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
exact Nat.cast_le.1 ((Nat.floor_le ha).trans h)
· rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (le_floor h), ← floor_add_nat _, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left ((add_zero _).trans_le h)
#align nat.floor_sub_nat Nat.floor_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_one [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - 1 :=
mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, not_iff_not, lt_ceil]
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right,
lt_ceil]
· exact iff_of_true (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt ha <| cast_lt.2 hb) (Nat.lt_add_left _ hb)
#align nat.ceil_add_nat Nat.ceil_add_nat
theorem ceil_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_nat ha 1`
rw [cast_one.symm, ceil_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.ceil_add_one Nat.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat ha n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_ceil.1 <| (Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans_le (ceil_add_one ha).ge
#align nat.ceil_lt_add_one Nat.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ + ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add]
exact _root_.add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align nat.ceil_add_le Nat.ceil_add_le
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋₊ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| lt_floor_add_one a
#align nat.sub_one_lt_floor Nat.sub_one_lt_floor
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] [FloorSemiring α]
-- TODO: should these lemmas be `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem floor_div_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a / n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / n := by
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [floor_of_nonpos, floor_of_nonpos ha]
· simp
apply div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [cast_zero, div_zero, Nat.div_zero, floor_zero]
refine (floor_eq_iff ?_).2 ?_
· exact div_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
constructor
· exact cast_div_le.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (floor_le ha) n.cast_nonneg)
rw [div_lt_iff, add_mul, one_mul, ← cast_mul, ← cast_add, ← floor_lt ha]
· exact lt_div_mul_add hn
· exact cast_pos.2 hn
#align nat.floor_div_nat Nat.floor_div_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_div_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a / (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_div_nat a n
/-- Natural division is the floor of field division. -/
theorem floor_div_eq_div (m n : ℕ) : ⌊(m : α) / n⌋₊ = m / n := by
convert floor_div_nat (m : α) n
rw [m.floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_div_eq_div Nat.floor_div_eq_div
end LinearOrderedSemifield
end Nat
/-- There exists at most one `FloorSemiring` structure on a linear ordered semiring. -/
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/-- A `FloorRing` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (a : α), z ≤ floor a ↔ (z : α) ≤ a)`.
-/
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
/-- `FloorRing.floor a` computes the greatest integer `z` such that `(z : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil a` computes the least integer `z` such that `a ≤ (z : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the upper adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `floor` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `ceil` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
/-- `Int.floor a` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`. It is denoted with `⌊a⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
/-- `Int.ceil a` is the smallest integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈a⌉`. -/
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
/-- `Int.fract a`, the fractional part of `a`, is `a` minus its floor. -/
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
/-! #### Floor -/
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
/-! #### Fractional part -/
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
/-- The fractional part of `a` is positive if and only if `a ≠ ⌊a⌋`. -/
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
#align int.fract_mul_nat Int.fract_mul_nat
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
theorem preimage_fract (s : Set α) :
fract ⁻¹' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x => x - (m:α)) ⁻¹' (s ∩ Ico (0 : α) 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⌊x⌋, h, fract_nonneg x, fract_lt_one x⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨m, hms, hm0, hm1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊x⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 hm0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 hm1⟩
exact hms
#align int.preimage_fract Int.preimage_fract
theorem image_fract (s : Set α) : fract '' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x : α => x - m) '' s ∩ Ico 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_image, mem_inter_iff, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⌊y⌋, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, fract_nonneg y, fract_lt_one y⟩
· rintro ⟨m, ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩, h0, h1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊y⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 h0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 h1⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩
#align int.image_fract Int.image_fract
section LinearOrderedField
variable {k : Type*} [LinearOrderedField k] [FloorRing k] {b : k}
theorem fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico (a b : k) (ha : 0 < a) : fract (b / a) * a ∈ Ico 0 a :=
⟨(mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right ha).2 (fract_nonneg (b / a)),
(mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left ha).2 (fract_lt_one (b / a))⟩
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico
theorem fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq (a b : k) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
fract (b / a) * a + ⌊b / a⌋ • a = b := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, ← add_mul, fract_add_floor, div_mul_cancel₀ b ha]
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b :=
sub_nonneg_of_le <| (le_div_iff hb).1 <| floor_le _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_lt (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b < b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| by
-- Porting note: `← one_add_mul` worked in mathlib3 without the argument
rw [← one_add_mul _ b, ← div_lt_iff hb, add_comm]
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt
theorem fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod {m n : ℕ} : fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hn' : 0 < (n : k) := by
norm_cast
refine fract_eq_iff.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, m / n, ?_⟩
· positivity
· simpa only [div_lt_one hn', Nat.cast_lt] using m.mod_lt hn
· rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← mul_right_inj' hn'.ne', mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne', mul_add,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne']
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Nat.mod_add_div m n]
#align int.fract_div_nat_cast_eq_div_nat_cast_mod Int.fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod
-- TODO Generalise this to allow `n : ℤ` using `Int.fmod` instead of `Int.mod`.
theorem fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
replace hn : 0 < (n : k) := by norm_cast
have : ∀ {l : ℤ}, 0 ≤ l → fract ((l : k) / n) = ↑(l % n) / n := by
intros l hl
obtain ⟨l₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := l.eq_nat_or_neg
· rw [cast_natCast, ← natCast_mod, cast_natCast, fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod]
· rw [Right.nonneg_neg_iff, natCast_nonpos_iff] at hl
simp [hl, zero_mod]
obtain ⟨m₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := m.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact this (ofNat_nonneg m₀)
let q := ⌈↑m₀ / (n : k)⌉
let m₁ := q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)
have hm₁ : 0 ≤ m₁ := by
simpa [m₁, ← @cast_le k, ← div_le_iff hn] using FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l _
calc
fract ((Int.cast (-(m₀ : ℤ)) : k) / (n : k))
-- Porting note: the `rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]` was `push_cast`
= fract (-(m₀ : k) / n) := by rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]
_ = fract ((m₁ : k) / n) := ?_
_ = Int.cast (m₁ % (n : ℤ)) / Nat.cast n := this hm₁
_ = Int.cast (-(↑m₀ : ℤ) % ↑n) / Nat.cast n := ?_
· rw [← fract_int_add q, ← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (q : k) hn.ne', ← add_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- Porting note: the `simp` was `push_cast`
simp [m₁]
· congr 2
change (q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)) % ↑n = _
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (q * ↑n), add_mul_emod_self]
#align int.fract_div_int_cast_eq_div_int_cast_mod Int.fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod
end LinearOrderedField
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil ((↑) : ℤ → α) :=
FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe
#align int.gc_ceil_coe Int.gc_ceil_coe
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉ ≤ z ↔ a ≤ z :=
gc_ceil_coe a z
#align int.ceil_le Int.ceil_le
theorem floor_neg : ⌊-a⌋ = -⌈a⌉ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun z => by rw [le_neg, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, le_neg]
#align int.floor_neg Int.floor_neg
theorem ceil_neg : ⌈-a⌉ = -⌊a⌋ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z => by rw [neg_le, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le]
#align int.ceil_neg Int.ceil_neg
theorem lt_ceil : z < ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align int.lt_ceil Int.lt_ceil
@[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : z + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a := by rw [← lt_ceil, add_one_le_iff]
#align int.add_one_le_ceil_iff Int.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), add_one_le_ceil_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.one_le_ceil_iff Int.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉ ≤ ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align int.ceil_le_floor_add_one Int.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l a
#align int.le_ceil Int.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌈(z : α)⌉ = z :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_le]
#align int.ceil_int_cast Int.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.ceil_nat_cast Int.ceil_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌉ = n := ceil_natCast n
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℤ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align int.ceil_mono Int.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉ ≤ ⌈y⌉ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a + z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + z := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_add', ← floor_neg, ← floor_neg, neg_add', floor_sub_int]
#align int.ceil_add_int Int.ceil_add_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + n := by rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ceil_add_int]
#align int.ceil_add_nat Int.ceil_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a + 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ)`
rw [← ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ), cast_one]
#align int.ceil_add_one Int.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a - z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (ceil_add_int _ _)
#align int.ceil_sub_int Int.ceil_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a - n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - n := by
convert ceil_sub_int a n using 1
simp
#align int.ceil_sub_nat Int.ceil_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_one (a : α) : ⌈a - 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← ceil_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
#align int.ceil_sub_one Int.ceil_sub_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (a : α) : (⌈a⌉ : α) < a + 1 := by
rw [← lt_ceil, ← Int.cast_one, ceil_add_int]
apply lt_add_one
#align int.ceil_lt_add_one Int.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉ ≤ ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align int.ceil_add_le Int.ceil_add_le
theorem ceil_add_ceil_le (a b : α) : ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ ≤ ⌈a + b⌉ + 1 := by
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ceil_le, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, le_sub_comm]
refine (ceil_lt_add_one _).le.trans ?_
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', ← add_assoc, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_ceil _
#align int.ceil_add_ceil_le Int.ceil_add_ceil_le
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align int.ceil_pos Int.ceil_pos
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_zero Int.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_one Int.ceil_one
theorem ceil_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ ⌈a⌉ := mod_cast ha.trans (le_ceil a)
#align int.ceil_nonneg Int.ceil_nonneg
theorem ceil_eq_iff : ⌈a⌉ = z ↔ ↑z - 1 < a ∧ a ≤ z := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_sub, ← lt_ceil, Int.sub_one_lt_iff, le_antisymm_iff,
and_comm]
#align int.ceil_eq_iff Int.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero_iff : ⌈a⌉ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ioc (-1 : α) 0 := by simp [ceil_eq_iff]
#align int.ceil_eq_zero_iff Int.ceil_eq_zero_iff
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, ⌈a⌉ = z := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
ceil_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc' (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, (⌈a⌉ : α) = z := fun a ha =>
mod_cast ceil_eq_on_Ioc z a ha
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc' Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc'
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
cast_le.1 <| (floor_le _).trans <| le_ceil _
#align int.floor_le_ceil Int.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ⌊a⌋ < ⌈b⌉ :=
cast_lt.1 <| (floor_le a).trans_lt <| h.trans_le <| le_ceil b
#align int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt Int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m : α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_singleton (m : ℤ) : (ceil : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ioc ((m : α) - 1) m :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_ceil_singleton Int.preimage_ceil_singleton
theorem fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil (a : α) : fract a = 0 ∨ fract a = a + 1 - (⌈a⌉ : α) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (fract a) 0 with ha | ha
· exact Or.inl ha
right
suffices (⌈a⌉ : α) = ⌊a⌋ + 1 by
rw [this, ← self_sub_fract]
abel
norm_cast
rw [ceil_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, _root_.le_of_lt <| by simp⟩
rw [cast_add, cast_one, add_tsub_cancel_right, ← self_sub_fract a, sub_lt_self_iff]
exact ha.symm.lt_of_le (fract_nonneg a)
#align int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil Int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil
theorem ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) = a + 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract Int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract
theorem ceil_sub_self_eq (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) - a = 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_sub_self_eq Int.ceil_sub_self_eq
/-! #### Intervals -/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ioo Int.preimage_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ico Int.preimage_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Ioc Int.preimage_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Icc Int.preimage_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt]
#align int.preimage_Ioi Int.preimage_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align int.preimage_Ici Int.preimage_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Iio Int.preimage_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Iic Int.preimage_Iic
end Int
open Int
/-! ### Round -/
section round
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
/-- `round` rounds a number to the nearest integer. `round (1 / 2) = 1` -/
def round (x : α) : ℤ :=
if 2 * fract x < 1 then ⌊x⌋ else ⌈x⌉
#align round round
@[simp]
theorem round_zero : round (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [round]
#align round_zero round_zero
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,457 | 1,457 | theorem round_one : round (1 : α) = 1 := by | simp [round]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.AEval
#align_import data.polynomial.module from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"63417e01fbc711beaf25fa73b6edb395c0cfddd0"
/-!
# Polynomial module
In this file, we define the polynomial module for an `R`-module `M`, i.e. the `R[X]`-module `M[X]`.
This is defined as a type alias `PolynomialModule R M := ℕ →₀ M`, since there might be different
module structures on `ℕ →₀ M` of interest. See the docstring of `PolynomialModule` for details.
-/
universe u v
open Polynomial BigOperators
/-- The `R[X]`-module `M[X]` for an `R`-module `M`.
This is isomorphic (as an `R`-module) to `M[X]` when `M` is a ring.
We require all the module instances `Module S (PolynomialModule R M)` to factor through `R` except
`Module R[X] (PolynomialModule R M)`.
In this constraint, we have the following instances for example :
- `R` acts on `PolynomialModule R R[X]`
- `R[X]` acts on `PolynomialModule R R[X]` as `R[Y]` acting on `R[X][Y]`
- `R` acts on `PolynomialModule R[X] R[X]`
- `R[X]` acts on `PolynomialModule R[X] R[X]` as `R[X]` acting on `R[X][Y]`
- `R[X][X]` acts on `PolynomialModule R[X] R[X]` as `R[X][Y]` acting on itself
This is also the reason why `R` is included in the alias, or else there will be two different
instances of `Module R[X] (PolynomialModule R[X])`.
See https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/144837-PR-reviews/topic/.2315065.20polynomial.20modules
for the full discussion.
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def PolynomialModule (R M : Type*) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] := ℕ →₀ M
#align polynomial_module PolynomialModule
variable (R M : Type*) [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] (I : Ideal R)
-- Porting note: stated instead of deriving
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (PolynomialModule R M) := Finsupp.instInhabited
noncomputable instance : AddCommGroup (PolynomialModule R M) := Finsupp.instAddCommGroup
variable {M}
variable {S : Type*} [CommSemiring S] [Algebra S R] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M]
namespace PolynomialModule
/-- This is required to have the `IsScalarTower S R M` instance to avoid diamonds. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
noncomputable instance : Module S (PolynomialModule R M) :=
Finsupp.module ℕ M
instance instFunLike : FunLike (PolynomialModule R M) ℕ M :=
Finsupp.instFunLike
instance : CoeFun (PolynomialModule R M) fun _ => ℕ → M :=
Finsupp.instCoeFun
theorem zero_apply (i : ℕ) : (0 : PolynomialModule R M) i = 0 :=
Finsupp.zero_apply
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : PolynomialModule R M) (a : ℕ) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
Finsupp.add_apply g₁ g₂ a
/-- The monomial `m * x ^ i`. This is defeq to `Finsupp.singleAddHom`, and is redefined here
so that it has the desired type signature. -/
noncomputable def single (i : ℕ) : M →+ PolynomialModule R M :=
Finsupp.singleAddHom i
#align polynomial_module.single PolynomialModule.single
theorem single_apply (i : ℕ) (m : M) (n : ℕ) : single R i m n = ite (i = n) m 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align polynomial_module.single_apply PolynomialModule.single_apply
/-- `PolynomialModule.single` as a linear map. -/
noncomputable def lsingle (i : ℕ) : M →ₗ[R] PolynomialModule R M :=
Finsupp.lsingle i
#align polynomial_module.lsingle PolynomialModule.lsingle
theorem lsingle_apply (i : ℕ) (m : M) (n : ℕ) : lsingle R i m n = ite (i = n) m 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
#align polynomial_module.lsingle_apply PolynomialModule.lsingle_apply
theorem single_smul (i : ℕ) (r : R) (m : M) : single R i (r • m) = r • single R i m :=
(lsingle R i).map_smul r m
#align polynomial_module.single_smul PolynomialModule.single_smul
variable {R}
theorem induction_linear {P : PolynomialModule R M → Prop} (f : PolynomialModule R M) (h0 : P 0)
(hadd : ∀ f g, P f → P g → P (f + g)) (hsingle : ∀ a b, P (single R a b)) : P f :=
Finsupp.induction_linear f h0 hadd hsingle
#align polynomial_module.induction_linear PolynomialModule.induction_linear
noncomputable instance polynomialModule : Module R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) :=
inferInstanceAs (Module R[X] (Module.AEval' (Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ)))
#align polynomial_module.polynomial_module PolynomialModule.polynomialModule
lemma smul_def (f : R[X]) (m : PolynomialModule R M) :
f • m = aeval (Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ) f m := by
rfl
instance (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower S R M] :
IsScalarTower S R (PolynomialModule R M) :=
Finsupp.isScalarTower _ _
instance isScalarTower' (M : Type u) [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M]
[IsScalarTower S R M] : IsScalarTower S R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) := by
haveI : IsScalarTower R R[X] (PolynomialModule R M) :=
inferInstanceAs <| IsScalarTower R R[X] <| Module.AEval' <| Finsupp.lmapDomain M R Nat.succ
constructor
intro x y z
rw [← @IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S R, ← @IsScalarTower.algebraMap_smul S R, smul_assoc]
#align polynomial_module.is_scalar_tower' PolynomialModule.isScalarTower'
@[simp]
theorem monomial_smul_single (i : ℕ) (r : R) (j : ℕ) (m : M) :
monomial i r • single R j m = single R (i + j) (r • m) := by
simp only [LinearMap.mul_apply, Polynomial.aeval_monomial, LinearMap.pow_apply,
Module.algebraMap_end_apply, smul_def]
induction i generalizing r j m with
| zero =>
rw [Function.iterate_zero, zero_add]
exact Finsupp.smul_single r j m
| succ n hn =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ, Function.comp_apply, add_assoc, ← hn]
congr 2
rw [Nat.one_add]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_single
#align polynomial_module.monomial_smul_single PolynomialModule.monomial_smul_single
@[simp]
theorem monomial_smul_apply (i : ℕ) (r : R) (g : PolynomialModule R M) (n : ℕ) :
(monomial i r • g) n = ite (i ≤ n) (r • g (n - i)) 0 := by
induction' g using PolynomialModule.induction_linear with p q hp hq
· simp only [smul_zero, zero_apply, ite_self]
· simp only [smul_add, add_apply, hp, hq]
split_ifs
exacts [rfl, zero_add 0]
· rw [monomial_smul_single, single_apply, single_apply, smul_ite, smul_zero, ← ite_and]
congr
rw [eq_iff_iff]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨e, rfl⟩
rw [add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le e]
#align polynomial_module.monomial_smul_apply PolynomialModule.monomial_smul_apply
@[simp]
theorem smul_single_apply (i : ℕ) (f : R[X]) (m : M) (n : ℕ) :
(f • single R i m) n = ite (i ≤ n) (f.coeff (n - i) • m) 0 := by
induction' f using Polynomial.induction_on' with p q hp hq
· rw [add_smul, Finsupp.add_apply, hp, hq, coeff_add, add_smul]
split_ifs
exacts [rfl, zero_add 0]
· rw [monomial_smul_single, single_apply, coeff_monomial, ite_smul, zero_smul]
by_cases h : i ≤ n
· simp_rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le h, if_pos h]
· rw [if_neg h, ite_eq_right_iff]
intro e
exfalso
linarith
#align polynomial_module.smul_single_apply PolynomialModule.smul_single_apply
theorem smul_apply (f : R[X]) (g : PolynomialModule R M) (n : ℕ) :
(f • g) n = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, f.coeff x.1 • g x.2 := by
induction' f using Polynomial.induction_on' with p q hp hq f_n f_a
· rw [add_smul, Finsupp.add_apply, hp, hq, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib]
congr
ext
rw [coeff_add, add_smul]
· rw [Finset.Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ fun i j => (monomial f_n f_a).coeff i • g j,
monomial_smul_apply]
simp_rw [Polynomial.coeff_monomial, ← Finset.mem_range_succ_iff]
rw [← Finset.sum_ite_eq (Finset.range (Nat.succ n)) f_n (fun x => f_a • g (n - x))]
congr
ext x
split_ifs
exacts [rfl, (zero_smul R _).symm]
#align polynomial_module.smul_apply PolynomialModule.smul_apply
/-- `PolynomialModule R R` is isomorphic to `R[X]` as an `R[X]` module. -/
noncomputable def equivPolynomialSelf : PolynomialModule R R ≃ₗ[R[X]] R[X] :=
{ (Polynomial.toFinsuppIso R).symm with
map_smul' := fun r x => by
dsimp
rw [← RingEquiv.coe_toEquiv_symm, RingEquiv.coe_toEquiv]
induction' x using induction_linear with _ _ hp hq n a
· rw [smul_zero, map_zero, mul_zero]
· rw [smul_add, map_add, map_add, mul_add, hp, hq]
· ext i
simp only [coeff_ofFinsupp, smul_single_apply, toFinsuppIso_symm_apply, coeff_ofFinsupp,
single_apply, ge_iff_le, smul_eq_mul, Polynomial.coeff_mul, mul_ite, mul_zero]
split_ifs with hn
· rw [Finset.sum_eq_single (i - n, n)]
· simp only [ite_true]
· rintro ⟨p, q⟩ hpq1 hpq2
rw [Finset.mem_antidiagonal] at hpq1
split_ifs with H
· dsimp at H
exfalso
apply hpq2
rw [← hpq1, H]
simp only [add_le_iff_nonpos_left, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, add_tsub_cancel_right]
· rfl
· intro H
exfalso
apply H
rw [Finset.mem_antidiagonal, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hn]
· symm
rw [Finset.sum_ite_of_false, Finset.sum_const_zero]
simp_rw [Finset.mem_antidiagonal]
intro x hx
contrapose! hn
rw [add_comm, ← hn] at hx
exact Nat.le.intro hx }
#align polynomial_module.equiv_polynomial_self PolynomialModule.equivPolynomialSelf
/-- `PolynomialModule R S` is isomorphic to `S[X]` as an `R` module. -/
noncomputable def equivPolynomial {S : Type*} [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] :
PolynomialModule R S ≃ₗ[R] S[X] :=
{ (Polynomial.toFinsuppIso S).symm with map_smul' := fun _ _ => rfl }
#align polynomial_module.equiv_polynomial PolynomialModule.equivPolynomial
variable (R' : Type*) {M' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R' M']
variable [Algebra R R'] [Module R M'] [IsScalarTower R R' M']
/-- The image of a polynomial under a linear map. -/
noncomputable def map (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : PolynomialModule R M →ₗ[R] PolynomialModule R' M' :=
Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap f
#align polynomial_module.map PolynomialModule.map
@[simp]
theorem map_single (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (i : ℕ) (m : M) : map R' f (single R i m) = single R' i (f m) :=
Finsupp.mapRange_single (hf := f.map_zero)
#align polynomial_module.map_single PolynomialModule.map_single
theorem map_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (p : R[X]) (q : PolynomialModule R M) :
map R' f (p • q) = p.map (algebraMap R R') • map R' f q := by
apply induction_linear q
· rw [smul_zero, map_zero, smul_zero]
· intro f g e₁ e₂
rw [smul_add, map_add, e₁, e₂, map_add, smul_add]
intro i m
induction' p using Polynomial.induction_on' with _ _ e₁ e₂
· rw [add_smul, map_add, e₁, e₂, Polynomial.map_add, add_smul]
· rw [monomial_smul_single, map_single, Polynomial.map_monomial, map_single, monomial_smul_single,
f.map_smul, algebraMap_smul]
#align polynomial_module.map_smul PolynomialModule.map_smul
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p : PolynomialModule R M` at `r : R`. -/
@[simps! (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def eval (r : R) : PolynomialModule R M →ₗ[R] M where
toFun p := p.sum fun i m => r ^ i • m
map_add' x y := Finsupp.sum_add_index' (fun _ => smul_zero _) fun _ _ _ => smul_add _ _ _
map_smul' s m := by
refine (Finsupp.sum_smul_index' ?_).trans ?_
· exact fun i => smul_zero _
· simp_rw [RingHom.id_apply, Finsupp.smul_sum]
congr
ext i c
rw [smul_comm]
#align polynomial_module.eval PolynomialModule.eval
@[simp]
theorem eval_single (r : R) (i : ℕ) (m : M) : eval r (single R i m) = r ^ i • m :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index (smul_zero _)
#align polynomial_module.eval_single PolynomialModule.eval_single
@[simp]
theorem eval_lsingle (r : R) (i : ℕ) (m : M) : eval r (lsingle R i m) = r ^ i • m :=
eval_single r i m
#align polynomial_module.eval_lsingle PolynomialModule.eval_lsingle
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Module/Basic.lean | 282 | 292 | theorem eval_smul (p : R[X]) (q : PolynomialModule R M) (r : R) :
eval r (p • q) = p.eval r • eval r q := by |
apply induction_linear q
· rw [smul_zero, map_zero, smul_zero]
· intro f g e₁ e₂
rw [smul_add, map_add, e₁, e₂, map_add, smul_add]
intro i m
induction' p using Polynomial.induction_on' with _ _ e₁ e₂
· rw [add_smul, map_add, Polynomial.eval_add, e₁, e₂, add_smul]
· rw [monomial_smul_single, eval_single, Polynomial.eval_monomial, eval_single, smul_comm, ←
smul_smul, pow_add, mul_smul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.EssSup
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_seminorm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# ℒp space
This file describes properties of almost everywhere strongly measurable functions with finite
`p`-seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ` and defined for `p:ℝ≥0∞` as `0` if `p=0`,
`(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and `essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p=∞`.
The Prop-valued `Memℒp f p μ` states that a function `f : α → E` has finite `p`-seminorm
and is almost everywhere strongly measurable.
## Main definitions
* `snorm' f p μ` : `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `f : α → F` and `p : ℝ`, where `α` is a measurable
space and `F` is a normed group.
* `snormEssSup f μ` : seminorm in `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum `ess_sup ‖f‖ μ`.
* `snorm f p μ` : for `p : ℝ≥0∞`, seminorm in `ℒp`, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `snorm' f p μ`
for `0 < p < ∞` and to `snormEssSup f μ` for `p = ∞`.
* `Memℒp f p μ` : property that the function `f` is almost everywhere strongly measurable and has
finite `p`-seminorm for the measure `μ` (`snorm f p μ < ∞`)
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
section ℒp
/-!
### ℒp seminorm
We define the ℒp seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ`. For real `p`, it is given by an integral
formula (for which we use the notation `snorm' f p μ`), and for `p = ∞` it is the essential
supremum (for which we use the notation `snormEssSup f μ`).
We also define a predicate `Memℒp f p μ`, requesting that a function is almost everywhere
measurable and has finite `snorm f p μ`.
This paragraph is devoted to the basic properties of these definitions. It is constructed as
follows: for a given property, we prove it for `snorm'` and `snormEssSup` when it makes sense,
deduce it for `snorm`, and translate it in terms of `Memℒp`.
-/
section ℒpSpaceDefinition
/-- `(∫ ‖f a‖^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)`, which is a seminorm on the space of measurable functions for which
this quantity is finite -/
def snorm' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
#align measure_theory.snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm'
/-- seminorm for `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum of `‖f‖`. -/
def snormEssSup {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (μ : Measure α) :=
essSup (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup MeasureTheory.snormEssSup
/-- `ℒp` seminorm, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and to
`essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p = ∞`. -/
def snorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p = 0 then 0 else if p = ∞ then snormEssSup f μ else snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm MeasureTheory.snorm
theorem snorm_eq_snorm' (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ := by simp [snorm, hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_snorm'
theorem snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = (∫⁻ x, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm
theorem snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {f : α → F} : snorm f 1 μ = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ENNReal.one_toReal,
one_div_one, ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
@[simp]
theorem snorm_exponent_top {f : α → F} : snorm f ∞ μ = snormEssSup f μ := by simp [snorm]
#align measure_theory.snorm_exponent_top MeasureTheory.snorm_exponent_top
/-- The property that `f:α→E` is ae strongly measurable and `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ)^(1/p)` is finite
if `p < ∞`, or `essSup f < ∞` if `p = ∞`. -/
def Memℒp {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ∧ snorm f p μ < ∞
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Memℒp
theorem Memℒp.aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (h : Memℒp f p μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
h.1
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Memℒp.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q) :
(∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) = snorm' f q μ ^ q := by
rw [snorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
exact (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm'
end ℒpSpaceDefinition
section Top
theorem Memℒp.snorm_lt_top {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_lt_top
theorem Memℒp.snorm_ne_top {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_ne_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : snorm' f q μ < ∞) : (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : snorm f p μ < ∞) : (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top
theorem snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : snorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
#align measure_theory.snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [snorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_exponent_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [snorm]
#align measure_theory.snorm_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_exponent_zero
@[simp]
theorem memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → E} :
Memℒp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [Memℒp, snorm_exponent_zero]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_zero_iff_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 := by simp [snorm', hp0_lt]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact snorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [snorm', ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_zero' MeasureTheory.snorm'_zero'
@[simp]
theorem snormEssSup_zero : snormEssSup (0 : α → F) μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, Pi.zero_apply, nnnorm_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero]
exact essSup_const_bot
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_zero MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_zero : snorm (0 : α → F) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_zero' : snorm (fun _ : α => (0 : F)) p μ = 0 := by convert snorm_zero (F := F)
#align measure_theory.snorm_zero' MeasureTheory.snorm_zero'
theorem zero_memℒp : Memℒp (0 : α → E) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by
rw [snorm_zero]
exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.zero_mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.zero_memℒp
theorem zero_mem_ℒp' : Memℒp (fun _ : α => (0 : E)) p μ := zero_memℒp (E := E)
#align measure_theory.zero_mem_ℒp' MeasureTheory.zero_mem_ℒp'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → F} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [snorm', hq_pos]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → F} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
snorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [snorm', hq_neg]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem snormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [snormEssSup]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_measure_zero MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_measure_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_measure_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_measure_zero
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_neg {f : α → F} : snorm' (-f) q μ = snorm' f q μ := by simp [snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm'_neg MeasureTheory.snorm'_neg
@[simp]
theorem snorm_neg {f : α → F} : snorm (-f) p μ = snorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, snormEssSup]
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_neg MeasureTheory.snorm_neg
theorem Memℒp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.neg MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg
theorem memℒp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : Memℒp (-f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, Memℒp.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_neg_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
theorem snorm'_const (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const MeasureTheory.snorm'_const
theorem snorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
constructor
· left
rwa [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, nnnorm_eq_zero]
· exact Or.inl ENNReal.coe_ne_top
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const' MeasureTheory.snorm'_const'
theorem snormEssSup_const (c : F) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by rw [snormEssSup, essSup_const _ hμ]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_const MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_const
theorem snorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by simp [snorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const_of_is_probability_measure MeasureTheory.snorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure
theorem snorm_const (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, snormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_const MeasureTheory.snorm_const
theorem snorm_const' (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_const' MeasureTheory.snorm_const'
theorem snorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true_iff, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
snorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, snorm_zero']
rw [snorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
by_cases hμ_top : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simp only [true_and_iff, one_div, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, false_or_iff, or_false_iff,
ENNReal.coe_lt_top, nnnorm_eq_zero, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero,
MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, hp, inv_lt_zero, hc, and_false_iff, false_and_iff,
inv_pos, or_self_iff, hμ_top, Ne.lt_top hμ_top, iff_true_iff]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_const_lt_top_iff MeasureTheory.snorm_const_lt_top_iff
theorem memℒp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [snorm_const c h0 hμ]
refine ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top ?_
refine (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ?_ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)).ne
simp
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_const
theorem memℒp_top_const (c : E) : Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h : μ = 0
· simp only [h, snorm_measure_zero, ENNReal.zero_lt_top]
· rw [snorm_const _ ENNReal.top_ne_zero h]
simp only [ENNReal.top_toReal, div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ENNReal.coe_lt_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_top_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_top_const
theorem memℒp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
rw [← snorm_const_lt_top_iff hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
exact ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, h⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_const_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_const_iff
end Const
theorem snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm' g q μ := by
simp only [snorm']
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
gcongr
#align measure_theory.snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae hq h
#align measure_theory.snorm'_mono_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_mono_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ := by
have : (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q :=
hfg.mono fun x hx => by simp_rw [hx]
simp only [snorm', lintegral_congr_ae this]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_norm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_norm_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_ae
theorem snormEssSup_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snormEssSup f μ = snormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∘ nnnorm))
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_congr_ae MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_congr_ae
theorem snormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ snormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ := by
simp only [snorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx)
· exact snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae h
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_ae
theorem snorm_mono_ae_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae <| h.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (Real.norm_eq_abs _).symm.le)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_ae_real MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_ae_real
theorem snorm_mono_nnnorm {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_nnnorm
theorem snorm_mono {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono MeasureTheory.snorm_mono
theorem snorm_mono_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae_real (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_real MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_real
theorem snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le (C : ℝ≥0∞) <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound
theorem snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 455 | 463 | theorem snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by |
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖(C : ℝ)‖₊ := hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans_eq C.nnnorm_eq.symm
refine (snorm_mono_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [snorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), C.nnnorm_eq, one_div, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.GiryMonad
#align_import probability.kernel.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Markov Kernels
A kernel from a measurable space `α` to another measurable space `β` is a measurable map
`α → MeasureTheory.Measure β`, where the measurable space instance on `measure β` is the one defined
in `MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace`. That is, a kernel `κ` verifies that for all
measurable sets `s` of `β`, `a ↦ κ a s` is measurable.
## Main definitions
Classes of kernels:
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel α β`: kernels from `α` to `β`, defined as the `AddSubmonoid` of the
measurable functions in `α → Measure β`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel κ`: a kernel from `α` to `β` is said to be a Markov kernel
if for all `a : α`, `k a` is a probability measure.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel κ`: a kernel from `α` to `β` is said to be finite if there
exists `C : ℝ≥0∞` such that `C < ∞` and for all `a : α`, `κ a univ ≤ C`. This implies in
particular that all measures in the image of `κ` are finite, but is stronger since it requires a
uniform bound. This stronger condition is necessary to ensure that the composition of two finite
kernels is finite.
* `ProbabilityTheory.IsSFiniteKernel κ`: a kernel is called s-finite if it is a countable
sum of finite kernels.
Particular kernels:
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.deterministic (f : α → β) (hf : Measurable f)`:
kernel `a ↦ Measure.dirac (f a)`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.const α (μβ : measure β)`: constant kernel `a ↦ μβ`.
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.restrict κ (hs : MeasurableSet s)`: kernel for which the image of
`a : α` is `(κ a).restrict s`.
Integral: `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(kernel.restrict κ hs a) = ∫⁻ b in s, f b ∂(κ a)`
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun`: if `∫⁻ b, f b ∂(κ a) = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂(η a)` for all measurable
functions `f` and all `a`, then the two kernels `κ` and `η` are equal.
-/
open MeasureTheory
open scoped MeasureTheory ENNReal NNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-- A kernel from a measurable space `α` to another measurable space `β` is a measurable function
`κ : α → Measure β`. The measurable space structure on `MeasureTheory.Measure β` is given by
`MeasureTheory.Measure.instMeasurableSpace`. A map `κ : α → MeasureTheory.Measure β` is measurable
iff `∀ s : Set β, MeasurableSet s → Measurable (fun a ↦ κ a s)`. -/
noncomputable def kernel (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
AddSubmonoid (α → Measure β) where
carrier := Measurable
zero_mem' := measurable_zero
add_mem' hf hg := Measurable.add hf hg
#align probability_theory.kernel ProbabilityTheory.kernel
-- Porting note: using `FunLike` instead of `CoeFun` to use `DFunLike.coe`
instance {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
FunLike (kernel α β) α (Measure β) where
coe := Subtype.val
coe_injective' := Subtype.val_injective
instance kernel.instCovariantAddLE {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
CovariantClass (kernel α β) (kernel α β) (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hμ a ↦ add_le_add_left (hμ a) _⟩
noncomputable
instance kernel.instOrderBot {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
OrderBot (kernel α β) where
bot := 0
bot_le κ a := by simp only [ZeroMemClass.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, Measure.zero_le]
variable {α β ι : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
namespace kernel
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : kernel α β) = 0 :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_fn_zero ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeFn_zero
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_add (κ η : kernel α β) : ⇑(κ + η) = κ + η :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_fn_add ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeFn_add
/-- Coercion to a function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom (α β : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] :
kernel α β →+ α → Measure β :=
AddSubmonoid.subtype _
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_add_hom ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coeAddHom
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (a : α) : (0 : kernel α β) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.zero_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.zero_apply
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) : ⇑(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(κ i) :=
map_sum (coeAddHom α β) _ _
#align probability_theory.kernel.coe_finset_sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.coe_finset_sum
theorem finset_sum_apply (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) a = ∑ i ∈ I, κ i a := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
#align probability_theory.kernel.finset_sum_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.finset_sum_apply
theorem finset_sum_apply' (I : Finset ι) (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
(∑ i ∈ I, κ i) a s = ∑ i ∈ I, κ i a s := by rw [finset_sum_apply, Measure.finset_sum_apply]
#align probability_theory.kernel.finset_sum_apply' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.finset_sum_apply'
end kernel
/-- A kernel is a Markov kernel if every measure in its image is a probability measure. -/
class IsMarkovKernel (κ : kernel α β) : Prop where
isProbabilityMeasure : ∀ a, IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a)
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel
/-- A kernel is finite if every measure in its image is finite, with a uniform bound. -/
class IsFiniteKernel (κ : kernel α β) : Prop where
exists_univ_le : ∃ C : ℝ≥0∞, C < ∞ ∧ ∀ a, κ a Set.univ ≤ C
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel
/-- A constant `C : ℝ≥0∞` such that `C < ∞` (`ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ`) and
for all `a : α` and `s : Set β`, `κ a s ≤ C` (`ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measure_le_bound κ a s`).
Porting note (#11215): TODO: does it make sense to
-- make `ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound` the least possible bound?
-- Should it be an `NNReal` number? -/
noncomputable def IsFiniteKernel.bound (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] : ℝ≥0∞ :=
h.exists_univ_le.choose
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound
theorem IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel.bound κ < ∞ :=
h.exists_univ_le.choose_spec.1
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound_lt_top ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top
theorem IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top (κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel.bound κ ≠ ∞ :=
(IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ).ne
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.bound_ne_top ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top
theorem kernel.measure_le_bound (κ : kernel α β) [h : IsFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) (s : Set β) :
κ a s ≤ IsFiniteKernel.bound κ :=
(measure_mono (Set.subset_univ s)).trans (h.exists_univ_le.choose_spec.2 a)
#align probability_theory.kernel.measure_le_bound ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measure_le_bound
instance isFiniteKernel_zero (α β : Type*) {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} :
IsFiniteKernel (0 : kernel α β) :=
⟨⟨0, ENNReal.coe_lt_top, fun _ => by
simp only [kernel.zero_apply, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, le_zero_iff]⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel_zero ProbabilityTheory.isFiniteKernel_zero
instance IsFiniteKernel.add (κ η : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] [IsFiniteKernel η] :
IsFiniteKernel (κ + η) := by
refine ⟨⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound κ + IsFiniteKernel.bound η,
ENNReal.add_lt_top.mpr ⟨IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ, IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top η⟩,
fun a => ?_⟩⟩
exact add_le_add (kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _) (kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _)
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.add ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.add
lemma isFiniteKernel_of_le {κ ν : kernel α β} [hν : IsFiniteKernel ν] (hκν : κ ≤ ν) :
IsFiniteKernel κ := by
refine ⟨hν.bound, hν.bound_lt_top, fun a ↦ (hκν _ _).trans (kernel.measure_le_bound ν a Set.univ)⟩
variable {κ : kernel α β}
instance IsMarkovKernel.is_probability_measure' [IsMarkovKernel κ] (a : α) :
IsProbabilityMeasure (κ a) :=
IsMarkovKernel.isProbabilityMeasure a
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel.is_probability_measure' ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel.is_probability_measure'
instance IsFiniteKernel.isFiniteMeasure [IsFiniteKernel κ] (a : α) : IsFiniteMeasure (κ a) :=
⟨(kernel.measure_le_bound κ a Set.univ).trans_lt (IsFiniteKernel.bound_lt_top κ)⟩
#align probability_theory.is_finite_kernel.is_finite_measure ProbabilityTheory.IsFiniteKernel.isFiniteMeasure
instance (priority := 100) IsMarkovKernel.isFiniteKernel [IsMarkovKernel κ] :
IsFiniteKernel κ :=
⟨⟨1, ENNReal.one_lt_top, fun _ => prob_le_one⟩⟩
#align probability_theory.is_markov_kernel.is_finite_kernel ProbabilityTheory.IsMarkovKernel.isFiniteKernel
namespace kernel
@[ext]
theorem ext {η : kernel α β} (h : ∀ a, κ a = η a) : κ = η := DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext
theorem ext_iff {η : kernel α β} : κ = η ↔ ∀ a, κ a = η a := DFunLike.ext_iff
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_iff ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_iff
theorem ext_iff' {η : kernel α β} :
κ = η ↔ ∀ a s, MeasurableSet s → κ a s = η a s := by
simp_rw [ext_iff, Measure.ext_iff]
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_iff' ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_iff'
theorem ext_fun {η : kernel α β} (h : ∀ a f, Measurable f → ∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ a = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂η a) :
κ = η := by
ext a s hs
specialize h a (s.indicator fun _ => 1) (Measurable.indicator measurable_const hs)
simp_rw [lintegral_indicator_const hs, one_mul] at h
rw [h]
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_fun ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun
theorem ext_fun_iff {η : kernel α β} :
κ = η ↔ ∀ a f, Measurable f → ∫⁻ b, f b ∂κ a = ∫⁻ b, f b ∂η a :=
⟨fun h a f _ => by rw [h], ext_fun⟩
#align probability_theory.kernel.ext_fun_iff ProbabilityTheory.kernel.ext_fun_iff
protected theorem measurable (κ : kernel α β) : Measurable κ :=
κ.prop
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable
protected theorem measurable_coe (κ : kernel α β) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun a => κ a s :=
(Measure.measurable_coe hs).comp (kernel.measurable κ)
#align probability_theory.kernel.measurable_coe ProbabilityTheory.kernel.measurable_coe
lemma IsFiniteKernel.integrable (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(κ : kernel α β) [IsFiniteKernel κ] {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x => (κ x s).toReal) μ := by
refine Integrable.mono' (integrable_const (IsFiniteKernel.bound κ).toReal)
((kernel.measurable_coe κ hs).ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable)
(ae_of_all μ fun x => ?_)
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg,
ENNReal.toReal_le_toReal (measure_ne_top _ _) (IsFiniteKernel.bound_ne_top _)]
exact kernel.measure_le_bound _ _ _
lemma IsMarkovKernel.integrable (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
(κ : kernel α β) [IsMarkovKernel κ] {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (fun x => (κ x s).toReal) μ :=
IsFiniteKernel.integrable μ κ hs
section Sum
/-- Sum of an indexed family of kernels. -/
protected noncomputable def sum [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) : kernel α β where
val a := Measure.sum fun n => κ n a
property := by
refine Measure.measurable_of_measurable_coe _ fun s hs => ?_
simp_rw [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
exact Measurable.ennreal_tsum fun n => kernel.measurable_coe (κ n) hs
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum
theorem sum_apply [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) :
kernel.sum κ a = Measure.sum fun n => κ n a :=
rfl
#align probability_theory.kernel.sum_apply ProbabilityTheory.kernel.sum_apply
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Basic.lean | 259 | 260 | theorem sum_apply' [Countable ι] (κ : ι → kernel α β) (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
kernel.sum κ a s = ∑' n, κ n a s := by | rw [sum_apply κ a, Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
#align_import data.pnat.factors from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3d9ab8faa9dea8f78155c6c27d62a621f4c152d"
/-!
# Prime factors of nonzero naturals
This file defines the factorization of a nonzero natural number `n` as a multiset of primes,
the multiplicity of `p` in this factors multiset being the p-adic valuation of `n`.
## Main declarations
* `PrimeMultiset`: Type of multisets of prime numbers.
* `FactorMultiset n`: Multiset of prime factors of `n`.
-/
-- Porting note: `deriving` contained Inhabited, CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
-- SemilatticeSup, OrderBot, Sub, OrderedSub
/-- The type of multisets of prime numbers. Unique factorization
gives an equivalence between this set and ℕ+, as we will formalize
below. -/
def PrimeMultiset :=
Multiset Nat.Primes deriving Inhabited, CanonicallyOrderedAddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
SemilatticeSup, Sub
#align prime_multiset PrimeMultiset
instance : OrderBot PrimeMultiset where
bot_le := by simp only [bot_le, forall_const]
instance : OrderedSub PrimeMultiset where
tsub_le_iff_right _ _ _ := Multiset.sub_le_iff_le_add
namespace PrimeMultiset
-- `@[derive]` doesn't work for `meta` instances
unsafe instance : Repr PrimeMultiset := by delta PrimeMultiset; infer_instance
/-- The multiset consisting of a single prime -/
def ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : PrimeMultiset :=
({p} : Multiset Nat.Primes)
#align prime_multiset.of_prime PrimeMultiset.ofPrime
theorem card_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : Multiset.card (ofPrime p) = 1 :=
rfl
#align prime_multiset.card_of_prime PrimeMultiset.card_ofPrime
/-- We can forget the primality property and regard a multiset
of primes as just a multiset of positive integers, or a multiset
of natural numbers. In the opposite direction, if we have a
multiset of positive integers or natural numbers, together with
a proof that all the elements are prime, then we can regard it
as a multiset of primes. The next block of results records
obvious properties of these coercions.
-/
def toNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ := fun v => v.map Coe.coe
#align prime_multiset.to_nat_multiset PrimeMultiset.toNatMultiset
instance coeNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨toNatMultiset⟩
#align prime_multiset.coe_nat PrimeMultiset.coeNat
/-- `PrimeMultiset.coe`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of
naturals, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ :=
{ Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom Coe.coe with toFun := Coe.coe }
#align prime_multiset.coe_nat_monoid_hom PrimeMultiset.coeNatMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeNatMonoidHom : (coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) = Coe.coe :=
rfl
#align prime_multiset.coe_coe_nat_monoid_hom PrimeMultiset.coe_coeNatMonoidHom
theorem coeNat_injective : Function.Injective (Coe.coe : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_nat_injective
#align prime_multiset.coe_nat_injective PrimeMultiset.coeNat_injective
theorem coeNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ) = {(p : ℕ)} :=
rfl
#align prime_multiset.coe_nat_of_prime PrimeMultiset.coeNat_ofPrime
theorem coeNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
#align prime_multiset.coe_nat_prime PrimeMultiset.coeNat_prime
/-- Converts a `PrimeMultiset` to a `Multiset ℕ+`. -/
def toPNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+ := fun v => v.map Coe.coe
#align prime_multiset.to_pnat_multiset PrimeMultiset.toPNatMultiset
instance coePNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ+) :=
⟨toPNatMultiset⟩
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat PrimeMultiset.coePNat
/-- `coePNat`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of positive
naturals, regarded as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ+ :=
{ Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom Coe.coe with toFun := Coe.coe }
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat_monoid_hom PrimeMultiset.coePNatMonoidHom
@[simp]
theorem coe_coePNatMonoidHom : (coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) = Coe.coe :=
rfl
#align prime_multiset.coe_coe_pnat_monoid_hom PrimeMultiset.coe_coePNatMonoidHom
theorem coePNat_injective : Function.Injective (Coe.coe : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat_injective PrimeMultiset.coePNat_injective
theorem coePNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ+) = {(p : ℕ+)} :=
rfl
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat_of_prime PrimeMultiset.coePNat_ofPrime
theorem coePNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ+) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ+)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat_prime PrimeMultiset.coePNat_prime
instance coeMultisetPNatNat : Coe (Multiset ℕ+) (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨fun v => v.map Coe.coe⟩
#align prime_multiset.coe_multiset_pnat_nat PrimeMultiset.coeMultisetPNatNat
theorem coePNat_nat (v : PrimeMultiset) : ((v : Multiset ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ) := by
change (v.map (Coe.coe : Nat.Primes → ℕ+)).map Subtype.val = v.map Subtype.val
rw [Multiset.map_map]
congr
#align prime_multiset.coe_pnat_nat PrimeMultiset.coePNat_nat
/-- The product of a `PrimeMultiset`, as a `ℕ+`. -/
def prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : ℕ+ :=
(v : Multiset PNat).prod
#align prime_multiset.prod PrimeMultiset.prod
theorem coe_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : (v.prod : ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ).prod := by
let h : (v.prod : ℕ) = ((v.map Coe.coe).map Coe.coe).prod :=
PNat.coeMonoidHom.map_multiset_prod v.toPNatMultiset
rw [Multiset.map_map] at h
have : (Coe.coe : ℕ+ → ℕ) ∘ (Coe.coe : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) = Coe.coe := funext fun p => rfl
rw [this] at h; exact h
#align prime_multiset.coe_prod PrimeMultiset.coe_prod
theorem prod_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p).prod = (p : ℕ+) :=
Multiset.prod_singleton _
#align prime_multiset.prod_of_prime PrimeMultiset.prod_ofPrime
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ Nat.Primes Nat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨p, hp⟩) v h
#align prime_multiset.of_nat_multiset PrimeMultiset.ofNatMultiset
theorem to_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) : (ofNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ) = v := by
dsimp [ofNatMultiset, toNatMultiset]
have : (fun p h => (Coe.coe : Nat.Primes → ℕ) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
#align prime_multiset.to_of_nat_multiset PrimeMultiset.to_ofNatMultiset
theorem prod_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) :
((ofNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ) = (v.prod : ℕ) := by rw [coe_prod, to_ofNatMultiset]
#align prime_multiset.prod_of_nat_multiset PrimeMultiset.prod_ofNatMultiset
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ+ Nat.Primes PNat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨(p : ℕ), hp⟩) v h
#align prime_multiset.of_pnat_multiset PrimeMultiset.ofPNatMultiset
theorem to_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ+) = v := by
dsimp [ofPNatMultiset, toPNatMultiset]
have : (fun (p : ℕ+) (h : p.Prime) => (Coe.coe : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
apply Subtype.eq
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
#align prime_multiset.to_of_pnat_multiset PrimeMultiset.to_ofPNatMultiset
theorem prod_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : ((ofPNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ+) = v.prod := by
dsimp [prod]
rw [to_ofPNatMultiset]
#align prime_multiset.prod_of_pnat_multiset PrimeMultiset.prod_ofPNatMultiset
/-- Lists can be coerced to multisets; here we have some results
about how this interacts with our constructions on multisets. -/
def ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
#align prime_multiset.of_nat_list PrimeMultiset.ofNatList
theorem prod_ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h) : ((ofNatList l h).prod : ℕ) = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
#align prime_multiset.prod_of_nat_list PrimeMultiset.prod_ofNatList
/-- If a `List ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset` with
the coercion from lists to multisets. -/
def ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
#align prime_multiset.of_pnat_list PrimeMultiset.ofPNatList
theorem prod_ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatList l h).prod = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
#align prime_multiset.prod_of_pnat_list PrimeMultiset.prod_ofPNatList
/-- The product map gives a homomorphism from the additive monoid
of multisets to the multiplicative monoid ℕ+. -/
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Factors.lean | 215 | 216 | theorem prod_zero : (0 : PrimeMultiset).prod = 1 := by |
exact Multiset.prod_zero
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.