Context stringlengths 285 157k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 18 3.69k | theorem stringlengths 25 2.71k | proof stringlengths 5 10.6k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Init.Data.Nat.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
#align_import algebra.order.floor from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"afdb43429311b885a7988ea15d0bac2aac80f69c"
/-!
# Floor and ceil
## Summary
We define the natural- and integer-valued floor and ceil functions on linearly ordered rings.
## Main Definitions
* `FloorSemiring`: An ordered semiring with natural-valued floor and ceil.
* `Nat.floor a`: Greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. Equal to `0` if `a < 0`.
* `Nat.ceil a`: Least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n`.
* `FloorRing`: A linearly ordered ring with integer-valued floor and ceil.
* `Int.floor a`: Greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`.
* `Int.ceil a`: Least integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`.
* `Int.fract a`: Fractional part of `a`, defined as `a - floor a`.
* `round a`: Nearest integer to `a`. It rounds halves towards infinity.
## Notations
* `⌊a⌋₊` is `Nat.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉₊` is `Nat.ceil a`.
* `⌊a⌋` is `Int.floor a`.
* `⌈a⌉` is `Int.ceil a`.
The index `₊` in the notations for `Nat.floor` and `Nat.ceil` is used in analogy to the notation
for `nnnorm`.
## TODO
`LinearOrderedRing`/`LinearOrderedSemiring` can be relaxed to `OrderedRing`/`OrderedSemiring` in
many lemmas.
## Tags
rounding, floor, ceil
-/
open Set
variable {F α β : Type*}
/-! ### Floor semiring -/
/-- A `FloorSemiring` is an ordered semiring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℕ` satisfying `∀ (n : ℕ) (x : α), n ≤ ⌊x⌋ ↔ (n : α) ≤ x)`.
Note that many lemmas require a `LinearOrder`. Please see the above `TODO`. -/
class FloorSemiring (α) [OrderedSemiring α] where
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor a` computes the greatest natural `n` such that `(n : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil a` computes the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ (n : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℕ
/-- `FloorSemiring.floor` of a negative element is zero. -/
floor_of_neg {a : α} (ha : a < 0) : floor a = 0
/-- A natural number `n` is smaller than `FloorSemiring.floor a` iff its coercion to `α` is
smaller than `a`. -/
gc_floor {a : α} {n : ℕ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ floor a ↔ (n : α) ≤ a
/-- `FloorSemiring.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℕ → α`. -/
gc_ceil : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_semiring FloorSemiring
instance : FloorSemiring ℕ where
floor := id
ceil := id
floor_of_neg ha := (Nat.not_lt_zero _ ha).elim
gc_floor _ := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil n a := by
rw [Nat.cast_id]
rfl
namespace Nat
section OrderedSemiring
variable [OrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
/-- `⌊a⌋₊` is the greatest natural `n` such that `n ≤ a`. If `a` is negative, then `⌊a⌋₊ = 0`. -/
def floor : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.floor
#align nat.floor Nat.floor
/-- `⌈a⌉₊` is the least natural `n` such that `a ≤ n` -/
def ceil : α → ℕ :=
FloorSemiring.ceil
#align nat.ceil Nat.ceil
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat : (Nat.floor : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.floor_nat Nat.floor_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_nat : (Nat.ceil : ℕ → ℕ) = id :=
rfl
#align nat.ceil_nat Nat.ceil_nat
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋₊" => Nat.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉₊" => Nat.ceil a
end OrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedSemiring
variable [LinearOrderedSemiring α] [FloorSemiring α] {a : α} {n : ℕ}
theorem le_floor_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a :=
FloorSemiring.gc_floor ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff Nat.le_floor_iff
theorem le_floor (h : (n : α) ≤ a) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ :=
(le_floor_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h).2 h
#align nat.le_floor Nat.le_floor
theorem floor_lt (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.floor_lt Nat.floor_lt
theorem floor_lt_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
(floor_lt ha).trans <| by rw [Nat.cast_one]
#align nat.floor_lt_one Nat.floor_lt_one
theorem lt_of_floor_lt (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < n) : a < n :=
lt_of_not_le fun h' => (le_floor h').not_lt h
#align nat.lt_of_floor_lt Nat.lt_of_floor_lt
theorem lt_one_of_floor_lt_one (h : ⌊a⌋₊ < 1) : a < 1 := mod_cast lt_of_floor_lt h
#align nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one Nat.lt_one_of_floor_lt_one
theorem floor_le (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌊a⌋₊ : α) ≤ a :=
(le_floor_iff ha).1 le_rfl
#align nat.floor_le Nat.floor_le
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊.succ :=
lt_of_floor_lt <| Nat.lt_succ_self _
#align nat.lt_succ_floor Nat.lt_succ_floor
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by simpa using lt_succ_floor a
#align nat.lt_floor_add_one Nat.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor_iff, Nat.cast_le]
exact n.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_coe Nat.floor_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-06-08")] alias floor_coe := floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_zero Nat.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_one Nat.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌋₊ = n :=
Nat.floor_natCast _
theorem floor_of_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 :=
ha.lt_or_eq.elim FloorSemiring.floor_of_neg <| by
rintro rfl
exact floor_zero
#align nat.floor_of_nonpos Nat.floor_of_nonpos
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℕ) := fun a b h => by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact le_floor ((floor_le ha).trans h)
#align nat.floor_mono Nat.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋₊ ≤ ⌊y⌋₊ := floor_mono
theorem le_floor_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : n ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ (n : α) ≤ a := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact
iff_of_false (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn).not_le
(not_le_of_lt <| ha.trans_lt <| cast_pos.2 <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
· exact le_floor_iff ha
#align nat.le_floor_iff' Nat.le_floor_iff'
@[simp]
theorem one_le_floor_iff (x : α) : 1 ≤ ⌊x⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
mod_cast @le_floor_iff' α _ _ x 1 one_ne_zero
#align nat.one_le_floor_iff Nat.one_le_floor_iff
theorem floor_lt' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ < n ↔ a < n :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_floor_iff' hn
#align nat.floor_lt' Nat.floor_lt'
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero`
rw [Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor_iff' Nat.one_ne_zero, cast_one]
#align nat.floor_pos Nat.floor_pos
theorem pos_of_floor_pos (h : 0 < ⌊a⌋₊) : 0 < a :=
(le_or_lt a 0).resolve_left fun ha => lt_irrefl 0 <| by rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha] at h
#align nat.pos_of_floor_pos Nat.pos_of_floor_pos
theorem lt_of_lt_floor (h : n < ⌊a⌋₊) : ↑n < a :=
(Nat.cast_lt.2 h).trans_le <| floor_le (pos_of_floor_pos <| (Nat.zero_le n).trans_lt h).le
#align nat.lt_of_lt_floor Nat.lt_of_lt_floor
theorem floor_le_of_le (h : a ≤ n) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ n :=
le_imp_le_iff_lt_imp_lt.2 lt_of_lt_floor h
#align nat.floor_le_of_le Nat.floor_le_of_le
theorem floor_le_one_of_le_one (h : a ≤ 1) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ 1 :=
floor_le_of_le <| h.trans_eq <| Nat.cast_one.symm
#align nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one Nat.floor_le_one_of_le_one
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero : ⌊a⌋₊ = 0 ↔ a < 1 := by
rw [← lt_one_iff, ← @cast_one α]
exact floor_lt' Nat.one_ne_zero
#align nat.floor_eq_zero Nat.floor_eq_zero
theorem floor_eq_iff (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff ha, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt ha, Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff Nat.floor_eq_iff
theorem floor_eq_iff' (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌊a⌋₊ = n ↔ ↑n ≤ a ∧ a < ↑n + 1 := by
rw [← le_floor_iff' hn, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, ← floor_lt' (Nat.add_one_ne_zero n),
Nat.lt_add_one_iff, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.floor_eq_iff' Nat.floor_eq_iff'
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℕ) : ∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), ⌊a⌋₊ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
(floor_eq_iff <| n.cast_nonneg.trans h₀).mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℕ) :
∀ a ∈ (Set.Ico n (n + 1) : Set α), (⌊a⌋₊ : α) = n :=
fun x hx => mod_cast floor_eq_on_Ico n x hx
#align nat.floor_eq_on_Ico' Nat.floor_eq_on_Ico'
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_zero : (floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iio 1 :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_floor_zero Nat.preimage_floor_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(n:α)`
theorem preimage_floor_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(floor : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ico (n:α) (n + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff' hn
#align nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_floor_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection (ceil : α → ℕ) (↑) :=
FloorSemiring.gc_ceil
#align nat.gc_ceil_coe Nat.gc_ceil_coe
@[simp]
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n ↔ a ≤ n :=
gc_ceil_coe _ _
#align nat.ceil_le Nat.ceil_le
theorem lt_ceil : n < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align nat.lt_ceil Nat.lt_ceil
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : n + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ (n : α) < a := by
rw [← Nat.lt_ceil, Nat.add_one_le_iff]
#align nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add 1, Nat.add_one_le_ceil_iff, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.one_le_ceil_iff Nat.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one Nat.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ :=
ceil_le.1 le_rfl
#align nat.le_ceil Nat.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α] (z : ℤ) :
⌈(z : α)⌉₊ = z.toNat :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by
simp only [ceil_le, Int.toNat_le]
norm_cast
#align nat.ceil_int_cast Nat.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉₊ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, cast_le]
#align nat.ceil_nat_cast Nat.ceil_natCast
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℕ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align nat.ceil_mono Nat.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉₊ ≤ ⌈y⌉₊ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉₊ = 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_zero Nat.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉₊ = 1 := by rw [← Nat.cast_one, ceil_natCast]
#align nat.ceil_one Nat.ceil_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)⌉₊ = n := ceil_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero : ⌈a⌉₊ = 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by rw [← Nat.le_zero, ceil_le, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_eq_zero Nat.ceil_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉₊ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align nat.ceil_pos Nat.ceil_pos
theorem lt_of_ceil_lt (h : ⌈a⌉₊ < n) : a < n :=
(le_ceil a).trans_lt (Nat.cast_lt.2 h)
#align nat.lt_of_ceil_lt Nat.lt_of_ceil_lt
theorem le_of_ceil_le (h : ⌈a⌉₊ ≤ n) : a ≤ n :=
(le_ceil a).trans (Nat.cast_le.2 h)
#align nat.le_of_ceil_le Nat.le_of_ceil_le
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha]
exact Nat.zero_le _
· exact cast_le.1 ((floor_le ha).trans <| le_ceil _)
#align nat.floor_le_ceil Nat.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos {a b : α} (h : a < b) (h' : 0 < b) : ⌊a⌋₊ < ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 a with (ha | ha)
· rw [floor_lt ha]
exact h.trans_le (le_ceil _)
· rwa [floor_of_nonpos ha.le, lt_ceil, Nat.cast_zero]
#align nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos Nat.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt_of_pos
theorem ceil_eq_iff (hn : n ≠ 0) : ⌈a⌉₊ = n ↔ ↑(n - 1) < a ∧ a ≤ n := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← not_le, ← ceil_le, not_le,
tsub_lt_iff_right (Nat.add_one_le_iff.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hn)), Nat.lt_add_one_iff,
le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
#align nat.ceil_eq_iff Nat.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_zero : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {0} = Iic 0 :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_zero
#align nat.preimage_ceil_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_zero
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(↑(n - 1))`
theorem preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero (hn : n ≠ 0) : (Nat.ceil : α → ℕ) ⁻¹' {n} = Ioc (↑(n - 1) : α) n :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff hn
#align nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero Nat.preimage_ceil_of_ne_zero
/-! #### Intervals -/
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioo Nat.preimage_Ioo
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉₊ ⌈b⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Ico Nat.preimage_Ico
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor_iff, hb, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioc Nat.preimage_Ioc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) :
(Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉₊ ⌊b⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, hb, le_floor_iff]
#align nat.preimage_Icc Nat.preimage_Icc
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Ioi Nat.preimage_Ioi
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align nat.preimage_Ici Nat.preimage_Ici
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio {a : α} : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉₊ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align nat.preimage_Iio Nat.preimage_Iio
-- Porting note: changed `(coe : ℕ → α)` to `(Nat.cast : ℕ → α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (Nat.cast : ℕ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋₊ := by
ext
simp [le_floor_iff, ha]
#align nat.preimage_Iic Nat.preimage_Iic
theorem floor_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by
rw [le_floor_iff (add_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg)]
obtain hb | hb := le_total n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_le_add_iff_right, add_le_add_iff_right,
le_floor_iff ha]
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_left_comm _ b, add_left_comm _ (b : α)]
refine iff_of_true ?_ le_self_add
exact le_add_of_nonneg_right <| ha.trans <| le_add_of_nonneg_right d.cast_nonneg
#align nat.floor_add_nat Nat.floor_add_nat
theorem floor_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌊a + 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_nat ha 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.floor_add_one Nat.floor_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat ha n
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) :
⌊a - n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - n := by
obtain ha | ha := le_total a 0
· rw [floor_of_nonpos ha, floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le (ha.trans n.cast_nonneg)), zero_tsub]
rcases le_total a n with h | h
· rw [floor_of_nonpos (tsub_nonpos_of_le h), eq_comm, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le]
exact Nat.cast_le.1 ((Nat.floor_le ha).trans h)
· rw [eq_tsub_iff_add_eq_of_le (le_floor h), ← floor_add_nat _, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
exact le_tsub_of_add_le_left ((add_zero _).trans_le h)
#align nat.floor_sub_nat Nat.floor_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_one [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - 1 :=
mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat [Sub α] [OrderedSub α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_add_nat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by
rw [← not_lt, ← not_lt, not_iff_not, lt_ceil]
obtain hb | hb := le_or_lt n b
· obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hb
rw [Nat.cast_add, add_comm n, add_comm (n : α), add_lt_add_iff_right, add_lt_add_iff_right,
lt_ceil]
· exact iff_of_true (lt_add_of_nonneg_of_lt ha <| cast_lt.2 hb) (Nat.lt_add_left _ hb)
#align nat.ceil_add_nat Nat.ceil_add_nat
theorem ceil_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : ⌈a + 1⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_nat ha 1`
rw [cast_one.symm, ceil_add_nat ha 1]
#align nat.ceil_add_one Nat.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (ha : 0 ≤ a) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉₊ = ⌈a⌉₊ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat ha n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (ha : 0 ≤ a) : (⌈a⌉₊ : α) < a + 1 :=
lt_ceil.1 <| (Nat.lt_succ_self _).trans_le (ceil_add_one ha).ge
#align nat.ceil_lt_add_one Nat.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉₊ ≤ ⌈a⌉₊ + ⌈b⌉₊ := by
rw [ceil_le, Nat.cast_add]
exact _root_.add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align nat.ceil_add_le Nat.ceil_add_le
end LinearOrderedSemiring
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorSemiring α]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋₊ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| lt_floor_add_one a
#align nat.sub_one_lt_floor Nat.sub_one_lt_floor
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [LinearOrderedSemifield α] [FloorSemiring α]
-- TODO: should these lemmas be `simp`? `norm_cast`?
theorem floor_div_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a / n⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / n := by
rcases le_total a 0 with ha | ha
· rw [floor_of_nonpos, floor_of_nonpos ha]
· simp
apply div_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
obtain rfl | hn := n.eq_zero_or_pos
· rw [cast_zero, div_zero, Nat.div_zero, floor_zero]
refine (floor_eq_iff ?_).2 ?_
· exact div_nonneg ha n.cast_nonneg
constructor
· exact cast_div_le.trans (div_le_div_of_nonneg_right (floor_le ha) n.cast_nonneg)
rw [div_lt_iff, add_mul, one_mul, ← cast_mul, ← cast_add, ← floor_lt ha]
· exact lt_div_mul_add hn
· exact cast_pos.2 hn
#align nat.floor_div_nat Nat.floor_div_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
theorem floor_div_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a / (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋₊ = ⌊a⌋₊ / OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_div_nat a n
/-- Natural division is the floor of field division. -/
theorem floor_div_eq_div (m n : ℕ) : ⌊(m : α) / n⌋₊ = m / n := by
convert floor_div_nat (m : α) n
rw [m.floor_natCast]
#align nat.floor_div_eq_div Nat.floor_div_eq_div
end LinearOrderedSemifield
end Nat
/-- There exists at most one `FloorSemiring` structure on a linear ordered semiring. -/
theorem subsingleton_floorSemiring {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α] :
Subsingleton (FloorSemiring α) := by
refine ⟨fun H₁ H₂ => ?_⟩
have : H₁.ceil = H₂.ceil := funext fun a => (H₁.gc_ceil.l_unique H₂.gc_ceil) fun n => rfl
have : H₁.floor = H₂.floor := by
ext a
cases' lt_or_le a 0 with h h
· rw [H₁.floor_of_neg, H₂.floor_of_neg] <;> exact h
· refine eq_of_forall_le_iff fun n => ?_
rw [H₁.gc_floor, H₂.gc_floor] <;> exact h
cases H₁
cases H₂
congr
#align subsingleton_floor_semiring subsingleton_floorSemiring
/-! ### Floor rings -/
/-- A `FloorRing` is a linear ordered ring over `α` with a function
`floor : α → ℤ` satisfying `∀ (z : ℤ) (a : α), z ≤ floor a ↔ (z : α) ≤ a)`.
-/
class FloorRing (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] where
/-- `FloorRing.floor a` computes the greatest integer `z` such that `(z : α) ≤ a`. -/
floor : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil a` computes the least integer `z` such that `a ≤ (z : α)`. -/
ceil : α → ℤ
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the upper adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor
/-- `FloorRing.ceil` is the lower adjoint of the coercion `↑ : ℤ → α`. -/
gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)
#align floor_ring FloorRing
instance : FloorRing ℤ where
floor := id
ceil := id
gc_coe_floor a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
gc_ceil_coe a b := by
rw [Int.cast_id]
rfl
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `floor` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofFloor (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (floor : α → ℤ)
(gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection (↑) floor) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor
ceil := fun a => -floor (-a)
gc_coe_floor
gc_ceil_coe := fun a z => by rw [neg_le, ← gc_coe_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff] }
#align floor_ring.of_floor FloorRing.ofFloor
/-- A `FloorRing` constructor from the `ceil` function alone. -/
def FloorRing.ofCeil (α) [LinearOrderedRing α] (ceil : α → ℤ)
(gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil (↑)) : FloorRing α :=
{ floor := fun a => -ceil (-a)
ceil
gc_coe_floor := fun a z => by rw [le_neg, gc_ceil_coe, Int.cast_neg, neg_le_neg_iff]
gc_ceil_coe }
#align floor_ring.of_ceil FloorRing.ofCeil
namespace Int
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α] {z : ℤ} {a : α}
/-- `Int.floor a` is the greatest integer `z` such that `z ≤ a`. It is denoted with `⌊a⌋`. -/
def floor : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.floor
#align int.floor Int.floor
/-- `Int.ceil a` is the smallest integer `z` such that `a ≤ z`. It is denoted with `⌈a⌉`. -/
def ceil : α → ℤ :=
FloorRing.ceil
#align int.ceil Int.ceil
/-- `Int.fract a`, the fractional part of `a`, is `a` minus its floor. -/
def fract (a : α) : α :=
a - floor a
#align int.fract Int.fract
@[simp]
theorem floor_int : (Int.floor : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.floor_int Int.floor_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_int : (Int.ceil : ℤ → ℤ) = id :=
rfl
#align int.ceil_int Int.ceil_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_int : (Int.fract : ℤ → ℤ) = 0 :=
funext fun x => by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_int Int.fract_int
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌊" a "⌋" => Int.floor a
@[inherit_doc]
notation "⌈" a "⌉" => Int.ceil a
-- Mathematical notation for `fract a` is usually `{a}`. Let's not even go there.
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_floor_eq : @FloorRing.floor = @Int.floor :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_floor_eq Int.floorRing_floor_eq
@[simp]
theorem floorRing_ceil_eq : @FloorRing.ceil = @Int.ceil :=
rfl
#align int.floor_ring_ceil_eq Int.floorRing_ceil_eq
/-! #### Floor -/
theorem gc_coe_floor : GaloisConnection ((↑) : ℤ → α) floor :=
FloorRing.gc_coe_floor
#align int.gc_coe_floor Int.gc_coe_floor
theorem le_floor : z ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ (z : α) ≤ a :=
(gc_coe_floor z a).symm
#align int.le_floor Int.le_floor
theorem floor_lt : ⌊a⌋ < z ↔ a < z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le le_floor
#align int.floor_lt Int.floor_lt
theorem floor_le (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a :=
gc_coe_floor.l_u_le a
#align int.floor_le Int.floor_le
theorem floor_nonneg : 0 ≤ ⌊a⌋ ↔ 0 ≤ a := by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_zero]
#align int.floor_nonneg Int.floor_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_sub_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ z - 1 ↔ a < z := by rw [← floor_lt, le_sub_one_iff]
#align int.floor_le_sub_one_iff Int.floor_le_sub_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_le_neg_one_iff : ⌊a⌋ ≤ -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
rw [← zero_sub (1 : ℤ), floor_le_sub_one_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.floor_le_neg_one_iff Int.floor_le_neg_one_iff
theorem floor_nonpos (ha : a ≤ 0) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ 0 := by
rw [← @cast_le α, Int.cast_zero]
exact (floor_le a).trans ha
#align int.floor_nonpos Int.floor_nonpos
theorem lt_succ_floor (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋.succ :=
floor_lt.1 <| Int.lt_succ_self _
#align int.lt_succ_floor Int.lt_succ_floor
@[simp]
theorem lt_floor_add_one (a : α) : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
simpa only [Int.succ, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one] using lt_succ_floor a
#align int.lt_floor_add_one Int.lt_floor_add_one
@[simp]
theorem sub_one_lt_floor (a : α) : a - 1 < ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 (lt_floor_add_one a)
#align int.sub_one_lt_floor Int.sub_one_lt_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌊(z : α)⌋ = z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, Int.cast_le]
#align int.floor_int_cast Int.floor_intCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌊(n : α)⌋ = n :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_floor, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.floor_nat_cast Int.floor_natCast
@[simp]
theorem floor_zero : ⌊(0 : α)⌋ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_zero Int.floor_zero
@[simp]
theorem floor_one : ⌊(1 : α)⌋ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, floor_intCast]
#align int.floor_one Int.floor_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem floor_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌋ = n :=
floor_natCast n
@[mono]
theorem floor_mono : Monotone (floor : α → ℤ) :=
gc_coe_floor.monotone_u
#align int.floor_mono Int.floor_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem floor_le_floor : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌊x⌋ ≤ ⌊y⌋ := floor_mono
theorem floor_pos : 0 < ⌊a⌋ ↔ 1 ≤ a := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert le_floor`
rw [Int.lt_iff_add_one_le, zero_add, le_floor, cast_one]
#align int.floor_pos Int.floor_pos
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a + z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + z :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by
rw [le_floor, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, ← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub]
#align int.floor_add_int Int.floor_add_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌊a + 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert floor_add_int a 1`
rw [← cast_one, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_one Int.floor_add_one
theorem le_floor_add (a b : α) : ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ ≤ ⌊a + b⌋ := by
rw [le_floor, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (floor_le _) (floor_le _)
#align int.le_floor_add Int.le_floor_add
theorem le_floor_add_floor (a b : α) : ⌊a + b⌋ - 1 ≤ ⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ := by
rw [← sub_le_iff_le_add, le_floor, Int.cast_sub, sub_le_comm, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
refine le_trans ?_ (sub_one_lt_floor _).le
rw [sub_le_iff_le_add', ← add_sub_assoc, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
exact floor_le _
#align int.le_floor_add_floor Int.le_floor_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_int_add (z : ℤ) (a : α) : ⌊↑z + a⌋ = z + ⌊a⌋ := by
simpa only [add_comm] using floor_add_int a z
#align int.floor_int_add Int.floor_int_add
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a + n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_add_int]
#align int.floor_add_nat Int.floor_add_nat
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem floor_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : ⌊↑n + a⌋ = n + ⌊a⌋ := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_int_add]
#align int.floor_nat_add Int.floor_nat_add
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
⌊(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a⌋ = OfNat.ofNat n + ⌊a⌋ :=
floor_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌊a - z⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (floor_add_int _ _)
#align int.floor_sub_int Int.floor_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌊a - n⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - n := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast, floor_sub_int]
#align int.floor_sub_nat Int.floor_sub_nat
@[simp] theorem floor_sub_one (a : α) : ⌊a - 1⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - 1 := mod_cast floor_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem floor_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌊a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌋ = ⌊a⌋ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
floor_sub_nat a n
theorem abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor {α : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommRing α] [FloorRing α]
{a b : α} (h : ⌊a⌋ = ⌊b⌋) : |a - b| < 1 := by
have : a < ⌊a⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one a
have : b < ⌊b⌋ + 1 := lt_floor_add_one b
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) = ⌊b⌋ := Int.cast_inj.2 h
have : (⌊a⌋ : α) ≤ a := floor_le a
have : (⌊b⌋ : α) ≤ b := floor_le b
exact abs_sub_lt_iff.2 ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
#align int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor Int.abs_sub_lt_one_of_floor_eq_floor
theorem floor_eq_iff : ⌊a⌋ = z ↔ ↑z ≤ a ∧ a < z + 1 := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, le_floor, ← Int.lt_add_one_iff, floor_lt, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one,
and_comm]
#align int.floor_eq_iff Int.floor_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_zero_iff : ⌊a⌋ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ico (0 : α) 1 := by simp [floor_eq_iff]
#align int.floor_eq_zero_iff Int.floor_eq_zero_iff
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), ⌊a⌋ = n := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
floor_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico Int.floor_eq_on_Ico
theorem floor_eq_on_Ico' (n : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ico (n : α) (n + 1), (⌊a⌋ : α) = n := fun a ha =>
congr_arg _ <| floor_eq_on_Ico n a ha
#align int.floor_eq_on_Ico' Int.floor_eq_on_Ico'
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_floor_singleton (m : ℤ) : (floor : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ico (m : α) (m + 1) :=
ext fun _ => floor_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_floor_singleton Int.preimage_floor_singleton
/-! #### Fractional part -/
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_floor (a : α) : a - ⌊a⌋ = fract a :=
rfl
#align int.self_sub_floor Int.self_sub_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_add_fract (a : α) : (⌊a⌋ : α) + fract a = a :=
add_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.floor_add_fract Int.floor_add_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_floor (a : α) : fract a + ⌊a⌋ = a :=
sub_add_cancel _ _
#align int.fract_add_floor Int.fract_add_floor
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_int Int.fract_add_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_nat (a : α) (m : ℕ) : fract (a + m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_add_nat Int.fract_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_one (a : α) : fract (a + 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_add_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem fract_int_add (m : ℤ) (a : α) : fract (↑m + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_int]
#align int.fract_int_add Int.fract_int_add
@[simp]
theorem fract_nat_add (n : ℕ) (a : α) : fract (↑n + a) = fract a := by rw [add_comm, fract_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_one_add (a : α) : fract (1 + a) = fract a := mod_cast fract_nat_add 1 a
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat_add (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] (a : α) :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) + a) = fract a :=
fract_nat_add n a
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_int (a : α) (m : ℤ) : fract (a - m) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_int Int.fract_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : fract (a - n) = fract a := by
rw [fract]
simp
#align int.fract_sub_nat Int.fract_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_one (a : α) : fract (a - 1) = fract a := mod_cast fract_sub_nat a 1
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract (a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))) = fract a :=
fract_sub_nat a n
-- Was a duplicate lemma under a bad name
#align int.fract_int_nat Int.fract_int_add
theorem fract_add_le (a b : α) : fract (a + b) ≤ fract a + fract b := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_le_sub_iff_left, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_le]
exact le_floor_add _ _
#align int.fract_add_le Int.fract_add_le
theorem fract_add_fract_le (a b : α) : fract a + fract b ≤ fract (a + b) + 1 := by
rw [fract, fract, fract, sub_add_sub_comm, sub_add, sub_le_sub_iff_left]
exact mod_cast le_floor_add_floor a b
#align int.fract_add_fract_le Int.fract_add_fract_le
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_fract (a : α) : a - fract a = ⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel _ _
#align int.self_sub_fract Int.self_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_sub_self (a : α) : fract a - a = -⌊a⌋ :=
sub_sub_cancel_left _ _
#align int.fract_sub_self Int.fract_sub_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_nonneg (a : α) : 0 ≤ fract a :=
sub_nonneg.2 <| floor_le _
#align int.fract_nonneg Int.fract_nonneg
/-- The fractional part of `a` is positive if and only if `a ≠ ⌊a⌋`. -/
lemma fract_pos : 0 < fract a ↔ a ≠ ⌊a⌋ :=
(fract_nonneg a).lt_iff_ne.trans <| ne_comm.trans sub_ne_zero
#align int.fract_pos Int.fract_pos
theorem fract_lt_one (a : α) : fract a < 1 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sub_one_lt_floor _
#align int.fract_lt_one Int.fract_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem fract_zero : fract (0 : α) = 0 := by rw [fract, floor_zero, cast_zero, sub_self]
#align int.fract_zero Int.fract_zero
@[simp]
theorem fract_one : fract (1 : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_one Int.fract_one
theorem abs_fract : |fract a| = fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| fract_nonneg a
#align int.abs_fract Int.abs_fract
@[simp]
theorem abs_one_sub_fract : |1 - fract a| = 1 - fract a :=
abs_eq_self.mpr <| sub_nonneg.mpr (fract_lt_one a).le
#align int.abs_one_sub_fract Int.abs_one_sub_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_intCast (z : ℤ) : fract (z : α) = 0 := by
unfold fract
rw [floor_intCast]
exact sub_self _
#align int.fract_int_cast Int.fract_intCast
@[simp]
theorem fract_natCast (n : ℕ) : fract (n : α) = 0 := by simp [fract]
#align int.fract_nat_cast Int.fract_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem fract_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
fract ((no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) : α) = 0 :=
fract_natCast n
-- porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
-- @[simp]
theorem fract_floor (a : α) : fract (⌊a⌋ : α) = 0 :=
fract_intCast _
#align int.fract_floor Int.fract_floor
@[simp]
theorem floor_fract (a : α) : ⌊fract a⌋ = 0 := by
rw [floor_eq_iff, Int.cast_zero, zero_add]; exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.floor_fract Int.floor_fract
theorem fract_eq_iff {a b : α} : fract a = b ↔ 0 ≤ b ∧ b < 1 ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← h]
exact ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, ⟨⌊a⌋, sub_sub_cancel _ _⟩⟩,
by
rintro ⟨h₀, h₁, z, hz⟩
rw [← self_sub_floor, eq_comm, eq_sub_iff_add_eq, add_comm, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, hz,
Int.cast_inj, floor_eq_iff, ← hz]
constructor <;> simpa [sub_eq_add_neg, add_assoc] ⟩
#align int.fract_eq_iff Int.fract_eq_iff
theorem fract_eq_fract {a b : α} : fract a = fract b ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, a - b = z :=
⟨fun h => ⟨⌊a⌋ - ⌊b⌋, by unfold fract at h; rw [Int.cast_sub, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub.1 h]⟩,
by
rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
refine fract_eq_iff.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _, z + ⌊b⌋, ?_⟩
rw [eq_add_of_sub_eq hz, add_comm, Int.cast_add]
exact add_sub_sub_cancel _ _ _⟩
#align int.fract_eq_fract Int.fract_eq_fract
@[simp]
theorem fract_eq_self {a : α} : fract a = a ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ a < 1 :=
fract_eq_iff.trans <| and_assoc.symm.trans <| and_iff_left ⟨0, by simp⟩
#align int.fract_eq_self Int.fract_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (a : α) : fract (fract a) = fract a :=
fract_eq_self.2 ⟨fract_nonneg _, fract_lt_one _⟩
#align int.fract_fract Int.fract_fract
theorem fract_add (a b : α) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract (a + b) - fract a - fract b = z :=
⟨⌊a⌋ + ⌊b⌋ - ⌊a + b⌋, by
unfold fract
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add_rev, neg_neg, cast_add, cast_neg]
abel⟩
#align int.fract_add Int.fract_add
theorem fract_neg {x : α} (hx : fract x ≠ 0) : fract (-x) = 1 - fract x := by
rw [fract_eq_iff]
constructor
· rw [le_sub_iff_add_le, zero_add]
exact (fract_lt_one x).le
refine ⟨sub_lt_self _ (lt_of_le_of_ne' (fract_nonneg x) hx), -⌊x⌋ - 1, ?_⟩
simp only [sub_sub_eq_add_sub, cast_sub, cast_neg, cast_one, sub_left_inj]
conv in -x => rw [← floor_add_fract x]
simp [-floor_add_fract]
#align int.fract_neg Int.fract_neg
@[simp]
theorem fract_neg_eq_zero {x : α} : fract (-x) = 0 ↔ fract x = 0 := by
simp only [fract_eq_iff, le_refl, zero_lt_one, tsub_zero, true_and_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨z, hz⟩ <;> use -z <;> simp [← hz]
#align int.fract_neg_eq_zero Int.fract_neg_eq_zero
theorem fract_mul_nat (a : α) (b : ℕ) : ∃ z : ℤ, fract a * b - fract (a * b) = z := by
induction' b with c hc
· use 0; simp
· rcases hc with ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, mul_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, mul_one]
rcases fract_add (a * c) a with ⟨y, hy⟩
use z - y
rw [Int.cast_sub, ← hz, ← hy]
abel
#align int.fract_mul_nat Int.fract_mul_nat
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m:α)`
theorem preimage_fract (s : Set α) :
fract ⁻¹' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x => x - (m:α)) ⁻¹' (s ∩ Ico (0 : α) 1) := by
ext x
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, mem_inter_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨⌊x⌋, h, fract_nonneg x, fract_lt_one x⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨m, hms, hm0, hm1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊x⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 hm0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 hm1⟩
exact hms
#align int.preimage_fract Int.preimage_fract
theorem image_fract (s : Set α) : fract '' s = ⋃ m : ℤ, (fun x : α => x - m) '' s ∩ Ico 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_image, mem_inter_iff, mem_iUnion]; constructor
· rintro ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⌊y⌋, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, fract_nonneg y, fract_lt_one y⟩
· rintro ⟨m, ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩, h0, h1⟩
obtain rfl : ⌊y⌋ = m := floor_eq_iff.2 ⟨sub_nonneg.1 h0, sub_lt_iff_lt_add'.1 h1⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, rfl⟩
#align int.image_fract Int.image_fract
section LinearOrderedField
variable {k : Type*} [LinearOrderedField k] [FloorRing k] {b : k}
theorem fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico (a b : k) (ha : 0 < a) : fract (b / a) * a ∈ Ico 0 a :=
⟨(mul_nonneg_iff_of_pos_right ha).2 (fract_nonneg (b / a)),
(mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left ha).2 (fract_lt_one (b / a))⟩
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico Int.fract_div_mul_self_mem_Ico
theorem fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq (a b : k) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
fract (b / a) * a + ⌊b / a⌋ • a = b := by
rw [zsmul_eq_mul, ← add_mul, fract_add_floor, div_mul_cancel₀ b ha]
#align int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq Int.fract_div_mul_self_add_zsmul_eq
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : 0 ≤ a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b :=
sub_nonneg_of_le <| (le_div_iff hb).1 <| floor_le _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg
theorem sub_floor_div_mul_lt (a : k) (hb : 0 < b) : a - ⌊a / b⌋ * b < b :=
sub_lt_iff_lt_add.2 <| by
-- Porting note: `← one_add_mul` worked in mathlib3 without the argument
rw [← one_add_mul _ b, ← div_lt_iff hb, add_comm]
exact lt_floor_add_one _
#align int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt
theorem fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod {m n : ℕ} : fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
have hn' : 0 < (n : k) := by
norm_cast
refine fract_eq_iff.mpr ⟨?_, ?_, m / n, ?_⟩
· positivity
· simpa only [div_lt_one hn', Nat.cast_lt] using m.mod_lt hn
· rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add', ← mul_right_inj' hn'.ne', mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne', mul_add,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ hn'.ne']
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.cast_add, Nat.mod_add_div m n]
#align int.fract_div_nat_cast_eq_div_nat_cast_mod Int.fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod
-- TODO Generalise this to allow `n : ℤ` using `Int.fmod` instead of `Int.mod`.
theorem fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod {m : ℤ} {n : ℕ} :
fract ((m : k) / n) = ↑(m % n) / n := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn)
· simp
replace hn : 0 < (n : k) := by norm_cast
have : ∀ {l : ℤ}, 0 ≤ l → fract ((l : k) / n) = ↑(l % n) / n := by
intros l hl
obtain ⟨l₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := l.eq_nat_or_neg
· rw [cast_natCast, ← natCast_mod, cast_natCast, fract_div_natCast_eq_div_natCast_mod]
· rw [Right.nonneg_neg_iff, natCast_nonpos_iff] at hl
simp [hl, zero_mod]
obtain ⟨m₀, rfl | rfl⟩ := m.eq_nat_or_neg
· exact this (ofNat_nonneg m₀)
let q := ⌈↑m₀ / (n : k)⌉
let m₁ := q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)
have hm₁ : 0 ≤ m₁ := by
simpa [m₁, ← @cast_le k, ← div_le_iff hn] using FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l _
calc
fract ((Int.cast (-(m₀ : ℤ)) : k) / (n : k))
-- Porting note: the `rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]` was `push_cast`
= fract (-(m₀ : k) / n) := by rw [cast_neg, cast_natCast]
_ = fract ((m₁ : k) / n) := ?_
_ = Int.cast (m₁ % (n : ℤ)) / Nat.cast n := this hm₁
_ = Int.cast (-(↑m₀ : ℤ) % ↑n) / Nat.cast n := ?_
· rw [← fract_int_add q, ← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (q : k) hn.ne', ← add_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- Porting note: the `simp` was `push_cast`
simp [m₁]
· congr 2
change (q * ↑n - (↑m₀ : ℤ)) % ↑n = _
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm (q * ↑n), add_mul_emod_self]
#align int.fract_div_int_cast_eq_div_int_cast_mod Int.fract_div_intCast_eq_div_intCast_mod
end LinearOrderedField
/-! #### Ceil -/
theorem gc_ceil_coe : GaloisConnection ceil ((↑) : ℤ → α) :=
FloorRing.gc_ceil_coe
#align int.gc_ceil_coe Int.gc_ceil_coe
theorem ceil_le : ⌈a⌉ ≤ z ↔ a ≤ z :=
gc_ceil_coe a z
#align int.ceil_le Int.ceil_le
theorem floor_neg : ⌊-a⌋ = -⌈a⌉ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun z => by rw [le_neg, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, le_neg]
#align int.floor_neg Int.floor_neg
theorem ceil_neg : ⌈-a⌉ = -⌊a⌋ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun z => by rw [neg_le, ceil_le, le_floor, Int.cast_neg, neg_le]
#align int.ceil_neg Int.ceil_neg
theorem lt_ceil : z < ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le ceil_le
#align int.lt_ceil Int.lt_ceil
@[simp]
theorem add_one_le_ceil_iff : z + 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ (z : α) < a := by rw [← lt_ceil, add_one_le_iff]
#align int.add_one_le_ceil_iff Int.add_one_le_ceil_iff
@[simp]
theorem one_le_ceil_iff : 1 ≤ ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← zero_add (1 : ℤ), add_one_le_ceil_iff, cast_zero]
#align int.one_le_ceil_iff Int.one_le_ceil_iff
theorem ceil_le_floor_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a⌉ ≤ ⌊a⌋ + 1 := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one]
exact (lt_floor_add_one a).le
#align int.ceil_le_floor_add_one Int.ceil_le_floor_add_one
theorem le_ceil (a : α) : a ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
gc_ceil_coe.le_u_l a
#align int.le_ceil Int.le_ceil
@[simp]
theorem ceil_intCast (z : ℤ) : ⌈(z : α)⌉ = z :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_le]
#align int.ceil_int_cast Int.ceil_intCast
@[simp]
theorem ceil_natCast (n : ℕ) : ⌈(n : α)⌉ = n :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [ceil_le, ← cast_natCast, cast_le]
#align int.ceil_nat_cast Int.ceil_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ⌈(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α))⌉ = n := ceil_natCast n
theorem ceil_mono : Monotone (ceil : α → ℤ) :=
gc_ceil_coe.monotone_l
#align int.ceil_mono Int.ceil_mono
@[gcongr]
theorem ceil_le_ceil : ∀ x y : α, x ≤ y → ⌈x⌉ ≤ ⌈y⌉ := ceil_mono
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a + z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + z := by
rw [← neg_inj, neg_add', ← floor_neg, ← floor_neg, neg_add', floor_sub_int]
#align int.ceil_add_int Int.ceil_add_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a + n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + n := by rw [← Int.cast_natCast, ceil_add_int]
#align int.ceil_add_nat Int.ceil_add_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_one (a : α) : ⌈a + 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ)`
rw [← ceil_add_int a (1 : ℤ), cast_one]
#align int.ceil_add_one Int.ceil_add_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_add_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a + (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ + OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_add_nat a n
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_int (a : α) (z : ℤ) : ⌈a - z⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - z :=
Eq.trans (by rw [Int.cast_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]) (ceil_add_int _ _)
#align int.ceil_sub_int Int.ceil_sub_int
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_nat (a : α) (n : ℕ) : ⌈a - n⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - n := by
convert ceil_sub_int a n using 1
simp
#align int.ceil_sub_nat Int.ceil_sub_nat
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_one (a : α) : ⌈a - 1⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - 1 := by
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← ceil_add_one, sub_add_cancel]
#align int.ceil_sub_one Int.ceil_sub_one
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem ceil_sub_ofNat (a : α) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
⌈a - (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n))⌉ = ⌈a⌉ - OfNat.ofNat n :=
ceil_sub_nat a n
theorem ceil_lt_add_one (a : α) : (⌈a⌉ : α) < a + 1 := by
rw [← lt_ceil, ← Int.cast_one, ceil_add_int]
apply lt_add_one
#align int.ceil_lt_add_one Int.ceil_lt_add_one
theorem ceil_add_le (a b : α) : ⌈a + b⌉ ≤ ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ := by
rw [ceil_le, Int.cast_add]
exact add_le_add (le_ceil _) (le_ceil _)
#align int.ceil_add_le Int.ceil_add_le
theorem ceil_add_ceil_le (a b : α) : ⌈a⌉ + ⌈b⌉ ≤ ⌈a + b⌉ + 1 := by
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ceil_le, Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, le_sub_comm]
refine (ceil_lt_add_one _).le.trans ?_
rw [le_sub_iff_add_le', ← add_assoc, add_le_add_iff_right]
exact le_ceil _
#align int.ceil_add_ceil_le Int.ceil_add_ceil_le
@[simp]
theorem ceil_pos : 0 < ⌈a⌉ ↔ 0 < a := by rw [lt_ceil, cast_zero]
#align int.ceil_pos Int.ceil_pos
@[simp]
theorem ceil_zero : ⌈(0 : α)⌉ = 0 := by rw [← cast_zero, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_zero Int.ceil_zero
@[simp]
theorem ceil_one : ⌈(1 : α)⌉ = 1 := by rw [← cast_one, ceil_intCast]
#align int.ceil_one Int.ceil_one
theorem ceil_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : 0 ≤ ⌈a⌉ := mod_cast ha.trans (le_ceil a)
#align int.ceil_nonneg Int.ceil_nonneg
theorem ceil_eq_iff : ⌈a⌉ = z ↔ ↑z - 1 < a ∧ a ≤ z := by
rw [← ceil_le, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_sub, ← lt_ceil, Int.sub_one_lt_iff, le_antisymm_iff,
and_comm]
#align int.ceil_eq_iff Int.ceil_eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_zero_iff : ⌈a⌉ = 0 ↔ a ∈ Ioc (-1 : α) 0 := by simp [ceil_eq_iff]
#align int.ceil_eq_zero_iff Int.ceil_eq_zero_iff
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, ⌈a⌉ = z := fun _ ⟨h₀, h₁⟩ =>
ceil_eq_iff.mpr ⟨h₀, h₁⟩
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc
theorem ceil_eq_on_Ioc' (z : ℤ) : ∀ a ∈ Set.Ioc (z - 1 : α) z, (⌈a⌉ : α) = z := fun a ha =>
mod_cast ceil_eq_on_Ioc z a ha
#align int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc' Int.ceil_eq_on_Ioc'
theorem floor_le_ceil (a : α) : ⌊a⌋ ≤ ⌈a⌉ :=
cast_le.1 <| (floor_le _).trans <| le_ceil _
#align int.floor_le_ceil Int.floor_le_ceil
theorem floor_lt_ceil_of_lt {a b : α} (h : a < b) : ⌊a⌋ < ⌈b⌉ :=
cast_lt.1 <| (floor_le a).trans_lt <| h.trans_le <| le_ceil b
#align int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt Int.floor_lt_ceil_of_lt
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 there was no need for the type annotation in `(m : α)`
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ceil_singleton (m : ℤ) : (ceil : α → ℤ) ⁻¹' {m} = Ioc ((m : α) - 1) m :=
ext fun _ => ceil_eq_iff
#align int.preimage_ceil_singleton Int.preimage_ceil_singleton
theorem fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil (a : α) : fract a = 0 ∨ fract a = a + 1 - (⌈a⌉ : α) := by
rcases eq_or_ne (fract a) 0 with ha | ha
· exact Or.inl ha
right
suffices (⌈a⌉ : α) = ⌊a⌋ + 1 by
rw [this, ← self_sub_fract]
abel
norm_cast
rw [ceil_eq_iff]
refine ⟨?_, _root_.le_of_lt <| by simp⟩
rw [cast_add, cast_one, add_tsub_cancel_right, ← self_sub_fract a, sub_lt_self_iff]
exact ha.symm.lt_of_le (fract_nonneg a)
#align int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil Int.fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil
theorem ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) = a + 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract Int.ceil_eq_add_one_sub_fract
theorem ceil_sub_self_eq (ha : fract a ≠ 0) : (⌈a⌉ : α) - a = 1 - fract a := by
rw [(or_iff_right ha).mp (fract_eq_zero_or_add_one_sub_ceil a)]
abel
#align int.ceil_sub_self_eq Int.ceil_sub_self_eq
/-! #### Intervals -/
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioo {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioo a b = Set.Ioo ⌊a⌋ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ioo Int.preimage_Ioo
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ico {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ico a b = Set.Ico ⌈a⌉ ⌈b⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Ico Int.preimage_Ico
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioc a b = Set.Ioc ⌊a⌋ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Ioc Int.preimage_Ioc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Icc {a b : α} : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Icc a b = Set.Icc ⌈a⌉ ⌊b⌋ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le, le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Icc Int.preimage_Icc
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ioi : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ioi a = Set.Ioi ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [floor_lt]
#align int.preimage_Ioi Int.preimage_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Ici : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Ici a = Set.Ici ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [ceil_le]
#align int.preimage_Ici Int.preimage_Ici
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iio : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iio a = Set.Iio ⌈a⌉ := by
ext
simp [lt_ceil]
#align int.preimage_Iio Int.preimage_Iio
@[simp]
theorem preimage_Iic : ((↑) : ℤ → α) ⁻¹' Set.Iic a = Set.Iic ⌊a⌋ := by
ext
simp [le_floor]
#align int.preimage_Iic Int.preimage_Iic
end Int
open Int
/-! ### Round -/
section round
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [FloorRing α]
/-- `round` rounds a number to the nearest integer. `round (1 / 2) = 1` -/
def round (x : α) : ℤ :=
if 2 * fract x < 1 then ⌊x⌋ else ⌈x⌉
#align round round
@[simp]
theorem round_zero : round (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [round]
#align round_zero round_zero
@[simp]
theorem round_one : round (1 : α) = 1 := by simp [round]
#align round_one round_one
@[simp]
theorem round_natCast (n : ℕ) : round (n : α) = n := by simp [round]
#align round_nat_cast round_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp]
theorem round_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : round (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n : α)) = n :=
round_natCast n
@[simp]
theorem round_intCast (n : ℤ) : round (n : α) = n := by simp [round]
#align round_int_cast round_intCast
@[simp]
theorem round_add_int (x : α) (y : ℤ) : round (x + y) = round x + y := by
rw [round, round, Int.fract_add_int, Int.floor_add_int, Int.ceil_add_int, ← apply_ite₂, ite_self]
#align round_add_int round_add_int
@[simp]
theorem round_add_one (a : α) : round (a + 1) = round a + 1 := by
-- Porting note: broken `convert round_add_int a 1`
rw [← round_add_int a 1, cast_one]
#align round_add_one round_add_one
@[simp]
theorem round_sub_int (x : α) (y : ℤ) : round (x - y) = round x - y := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
norm_cast
rw [round_add_int, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align round_sub_int round_sub_int
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 1,492 | 1,494 | theorem round_sub_one (a : α) : round (a - 1) = round a - 1 := by |
-- Porting note: broken `convert round_sub_int a 1`
rw [← round_sub_int a 1, cast_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Index
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Infinite
#align_import group_theory.order_of_element from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d07245fd37786daa997af4f1a73a49fa3b748408"
/-!
# Order of an element
This file defines the order of an element of a finite group. For a finite group `G` the order of
`x ∈ G` is the minimal `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`.
## Main definitions
* `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid `G` saying that `x` is of finite
order.
* `IsOfFinAddOrder` is the additive analogue of `IsOfFinOrder`.
* `orderOf x` defines the order of an element `x` of a monoid `G`, by convention its value is `0`
if `x` has infinite order.
* `addOrderOf` is the additive analogue of `orderOf`.
## Tags
order of an element
-/
open Function Fintype Nat Pointwise Subgroup Submonoid
variable {G H A α β : Type*}
section Monoid
variable [Monoid G] {a b x y : G} {n m : ℕ}
section IsOfFinOrder
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
@[to_additive]
theorem isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one (x : G) : IsPeriodicPt (x * ·) n 1 ↔ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [IsPeriodicPt, IsFixedPt, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align is_periodic_pt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_periodic_pt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isPeriodicPt_add_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
/-- `IsOfFinOrder` is a predicate on an element `x` of a monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there
exists `n ≥ 1` such that `x ^ n = 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`IsOfFinAddOrder` is a predicate on an element `a` of an
additive monoid to be of finite order, i.e. there exists `n ≥ 1` such that `n • a = 0`."]
def IsOfFinOrder (x : G) : Prop :=
(1 : G) ∈ periodicPts (x * ·)
#align is_of_fin_order IsOfFinOrder
#align is_of_fin_add_order IsOfFinAddOrder
theorem isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff : IsOfFinAddOrder (Additive.ofMul x) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_add_order_of_mul_iff isOfFinAddOrder_ofMul_iff
theorem isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] {x : α} :
IsOfFinOrder (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ↔ IsOfFinAddOrder x := Iff.rfl
#align is_of_fin_order_of_add_iff isOfFinOrder_ofAdd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one : IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ n, 0 < n ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
simp [IsOfFinOrder, mem_periodicPts, isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one]
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_pow_eq_one isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_nsmul_eq_zero isOfFinAddOrder_iff_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive] alias ⟨IsOfFinOrder.exists_pow_eq_one, _⟩ := isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one
@[to_additive]
lemma isOfFinOrder_iff_zpow_eq_one {G} [Group G] {x : G} :
IsOfFinOrder x ↔ ∃ (n : ℤ), n ≠ 0 ∧ x ^ n = 1 := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
refine ⟨fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n, Int.natCast_ne_zero_iff_pos.mpr hn, zpow_natCast x n ▸ hn'⟩,
fun ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩ ↦ ⟨n.natAbs, Int.natAbs_pos.mpr hn, ?_⟩⟩
cases' (Int.natAbs_eq_iff (a := n)).mp rfl with h h
· rwa [h, zpow_natCast] at hn'
· rwa [h, zpow_neg, inv_eq_one, zpow_natCast] at hn'
/-- See also `injective_pow_iff_not_isOfFinOrder`. -/
@[to_additive "See also `injective_nsmul_iff_not_isOfFinAddOrder`."]
theorem not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow {x : G} (h : Injective fun n : ℕ => x ^ n) :
¬IsOfFinOrder x := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
intro n hn_pos hnx
rw [← pow_zero x] at hnx
rw [h hnx] at hn_pos
exact irrefl 0 hn_pos
#align not_is_of_fin_order_of_injective_pow not_isOfFinOrder_of_injective_pow
#align not_is_of_fin_add_order_of_injective_nsmul not_isOfFinAddOrder_of_injective_nsmul
lemma IsOfFinOrder.pow {n : ℕ} : IsOfFinOrder a → IsOfFinOrder (a ^ n) := by
simp_rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
rintro ⟨m, hm, ha⟩
exact ⟨m, hm, by simp [pow_right_comm _ n, ha]⟩
/-- Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids. -/
@[to_additive "Elements of finite order are of finite order in submonoids."]
theorem Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe {H : Submonoid G} {x : H} :
IsOfFinOrder (x : G) ↔ IsOfFinOrder x := by
rw [isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one]
norm_cast
#align is_of_fin_order_iff_coe Submonoid.isOfFinOrder_coe
#align is_of_fin_add_order_iff_coe AddSubmonoid.isOfFinAddOrder_coe
/-- The image of an element of finite order has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The image of an element of finite additive order has finite additive order."]
theorem MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder [Monoid H] (f : G →* H) {x : G} (h : IsOfFinOrder x) :
IsOfFinOrder <| f x :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr <| by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact ⟨n, npos, by rw [← f.map_pow, hn, f.map_one]⟩
#align monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order MonoidHom.isOfFinOrder
#align add_monoid_hom.is_of_fin_order AddMonoidHom.isOfFinAddOrder
/-- If a direct product has finite order then so does each component. -/
@[to_additive "If a direct product has finite additive order then so does each component."]
theorem IsOfFinOrder.apply {η : Type*} {Gs : η → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Gs i)] {x : ∀ i, Gs i}
(h : IsOfFinOrder x) : ∀ i, IsOfFinOrder (x i) := by
obtain ⟨n, npos, hn⟩ := h.exists_pow_eq_one
exact fun _ => isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨n, npos, (congr_fun hn.symm _).symm⟩
#align is_of_fin_order.apply IsOfFinOrder.apply
#align is_of_fin_add_order.apply IsOfFinAddOrder.apply
/-- 1 is of finite order in any monoid. -/
@[to_additive "0 is of finite order in any additive monoid."]
theorem isOfFinOrder_one : IsOfFinOrder (1 : G) :=
isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one.mpr ⟨1, Nat.one_pos, one_pow 1⟩
#align is_of_fin_order_one isOfFinOrder_one
#align is_of_fin_order_zero isOfFinAddOrder_zero
/-- The submonoid generated by an element is a group if that element has finite order. -/
@[to_additive "The additive submonoid generated by an element is
an additive group if that element has finite order."]
noncomputable abbrev IsOfFinOrder.groupPowers (hx : IsOfFinOrder x) :
Group (Submonoid.powers x) := by
obtain ⟨hpos, hx⟩ := hx.exists_pow_eq_one.choose_spec
exact Submonoid.groupPowers hpos hx
end IsOfFinOrder
/-- `orderOf x` is the order of the element `x`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `x ^ n = 1` if it exists.
Otherwise, i.e. if `x` is of infinite order, then `orderOf x` is `0` by convention. -/
@[to_additive
"`addOrderOf a` is the order of the element `a`, i.e. the `n ≥ 1`, s.t. `n • a = 0` if it
exists. Otherwise, i.e. if `a` is of infinite order, then `addOrderOf a` is `0` by convention."]
noncomputable def orderOf (x : G) : ℕ :=
minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1
#align order_of orderOf
#align add_order_of addOrderOf
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf (x : G) : addOrderOf (Additive.ofMul x) = orderOf x :=
rfl
#align add_order_of_of_mul_eq_order_of addOrderOf_ofMul_eq_orderOf
@[simp]
lemma orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf {α : Type*} [AddMonoid α] (a : α) :
orderOf (Multiplicative.ofAdd a) = addOrderOf a := rfl
#align order_of_of_add_eq_add_order_of orderOf_ofAdd_eq_addOrderOf
@[to_additive]
protected lemma IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos (h : IsOfFinOrder x) : 0 < orderOf x :=
minimalPeriod_pos_of_mem_periodicPts h
#align order_of_pos' IsOfFinOrder.orderOf_pos
#align add_order_of_pos' IsOfFinAddOrder.addOrderOf_pos
@[to_additive addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero]
theorem pow_orderOf_eq_one (x : G) : x ^ orderOf x = 1 := by
convert Eq.trans _ (isPeriodicPt_minimalPeriod (x * ·) 1)
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed in the middle of the rewrite
rw [orderOf, mul_left_iterate]; beta_reduce; rw [mul_one]
#align pow_order_of_eq_one pow_orderOf_eq_one
#align add_order_of_nsmul_eq_zero addOrderOf_nsmul_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero (h : ¬IsOfFinOrder x) : orderOf x = 0 := by
rwa [orderOf, minimalPeriod, dif_neg]
#align order_of_eq_zero orderOf_eq_zero
#align add_order_of_eq_zero addOrderOf_eq_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ¬IsOfFinOrder x :=
⟨fun h H ↦ H.orderOf_pos.ne' h, orderOf_eq_zero⟩
#align order_of_eq_zero_iff orderOf_eq_zero_iff
#align add_order_of_eq_zero_iff addOrderOf_eq_zero_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem orderOf_eq_zero_iff' : orderOf x = 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, 0 < n → x ^ n ≠ 1 := by
simp_rw [orderOf_eq_zero_iff, isOfFinOrder_iff_pow_eq_one, not_exists, not_and]
#align order_of_eq_zero_iff' orderOf_eq_zero_iff'
#align add_order_of_eq_zero_iff' addOrderOf_eq_zero_iff'
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/OrderOfElement.lean | 203 | 214 | theorem orderOf_eq_iff {n} (h : 0 < n) :
orderOf x = n ↔ x ^ n = 1 ∧ ∀ m, m < n → 0 < m → x ^ m ≠ 1 := by |
simp_rw [Ne, ← isPeriodicPt_mul_iff_pow_eq_one, orderOf, minimalPeriod]
split_ifs with h1
· classical
rw [find_eq_iff]
simp only [h, true_and]
push_neg
rfl
· rw [iff_false_left h.ne]
rintro ⟨h', -⟩
exact h1 ⟨n, h, h'⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
import Mathlib.Order.WellFounded
#align_import set_theory.zfc.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0b3759a8ef0bd8239ecdaa5e1089add5feebe1a"
/-!
# A model of ZFC
In this file, we model Zermelo-Fraenkel set theory (+ Choice) using Lean's underlying type theory.
We do this in four main steps:
* Define pre-sets inductively.
* Define extensional equivalence on pre-sets and give it a `setoid` instance.
* Define ZFC sets by quotienting pre-sets by extensional equivalence.
* Define classes as sets of ZFC sets.
Then the rest is usual set theory.
## The model
* `PSet`: Pre-set. A pre-set is inductively defined by its indexing type and its members, which are
themselves pre-sets.
* `ZFSet`: ZFC set. Defined as `PSet` quotiented by `PSet.Equiv`, the extensional equivalence.
* `Class`: Class. Defined as `Set ZFSet`.
* `ZFSet.choice`: Axiom of choice. Proved from Lean's axiom of choice.
## Other definitions
* `PSet.Type`: Underlying type of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Func`: Underlying family of pre-sets of a pre-set.
* `PSet.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of pre-sets. Defined inductively.
* `PSet.omega`, `ZFSet.omega`: The von Neumann ordinal `ω` as a `PSet`, as a `Set`.
* `PSet.Arity.Equiv`: Extensional equivalence of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions. Extension of
`PSet.Equiv`.
* `PSet.Resp`: Collection of `n`-ary `PSet`-valued functions that respect extensional equivalence.
* `PSet.eval`: Turns a `PSet`-valued function that respect extensional equivalence into a
`ZFSet`-valued function.
* `Classical.allDefinable`: All functions are classically definable.
* `ZFSet.IsFunc` : Predicate that a ZFC set is a subset of `x × y` that can be considered as a ZFC
function `x → y`. That is, each member of `x` is related by the ZFC set to exactly one member of
`y`.
* `ZFSet.funs`: ZFC set of ZFC functions `x → y`.
* `ZFSet.Hereditarily p x`: Predicate that every set in the transitive closure of `x` has property
`p`.
* `Class.iota`: Definite description operator.
## Notes
To avoid confusion between the Lean `Set` and the ZFC `Set`, docstrings in this file refer to them
respectively as "`Set`" and "ZFC set".
## TODO
Prove `ZFSet.mapDefinableAux` computably.
-/
-- Porting note: Lean 3 uses `Set` for `ZFSet`.
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
universe u v
open Function (OfArity)
/-- The type of pre-sets in universe `u`. A pre-set
is a family of pre-sets indexed by a type in `Type u`.
The ZFC universe is defined as a quotient of this
to ensure extensionality. -/
inductive PSet : Type (u + 1)
| mk (α : Type u) (A : α → PSet) : PSet
#align pSet PSet
namespace PSet
/-- The underlying type of a pre-set -/
def «Type» : PSet → Type u
| ⟨α, _⟩ => α
#align pSet.type PSet.Type
/-- The underlying pre-set family of a pre-set -/
def Func : ∀ x : PSet, x.Type → PSet
| ⟨_, A⟩ => A
#align pSet.func PSet.Func
@[simp]
theorem mk_type (α A) : «Type» ⟨α, A⟩ = α :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_type PSet.mk_type
@[simp]
theorem mk_func (α A) : Func ⟨α, A⟩ = A :=
rfl
#align pSet.mk_func PSet.mk_func
@[simp]
theorem eta : ∀ x : PSet, mk x.Type x.Func = x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.eta PSet.eta
/-- Two pre-sets are extensionally equivalent if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family and vice-versa. -/
def Equiv : PSet → PSet → Prop
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => (∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) ∧ (∀ b, ∃ a, Equiv (A a) (B b))
#align pSet.equiv PSet.Equiv
theorem equiv_iff :
∀ {x y : PSet},
Equiv x y ↔ (∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)) ∧ ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ => Iff.rfl
#align pSet.equiv_iff PSet.equiv_iff
theorem Equiv.exists_left {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ i, ∃ j, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).1
#align pSet.equiv.exists_left PSet.Equiv.exists_left
theorem Equiv.exists_right {x y : PSet} (h : Equiv x y) : ∀ j, ∃ i, Equiv (x.Func i) (y.Func j) :=
(equiv_iff.1 h).2
#align pSet.equiv.exists_right PSet.Equiv.exists_right
@[refl]
protected theorem Equiv.refl : ∀ x, Equiv x x
| ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩, fun a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.refl PSet.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Equiv.rfl {x} : Equiv x x :=
Equiv.refl x
#align pSet.equiv.rfl PSet.Equiv.rfl
protected theorem Equiv.euc : ∀ {x y z}, Equiv x y → Equiv z y → Equiv x z
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, ⟨γβ, βγ⟩ =>
⟨ fun a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.euc ab bc⟩,
fun c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.euc ba cb⟩ ⟩
#align pSet.equiv.euc PSet.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Equiv.symm {x y} : Equiv x y → Equiv y x :=
(Equiv.refl y).euc
#align pSet.equiv.symm PSet.Equiv.symm
protected theorem Equiv.comm {x y} : Equiv x y ↔ Equiv y x :=
⟨Equiv.symm, Equiv.symm⟩
#align pSet.equiv.comm PSet.Equiv.comm
@[trans]
protected theorem Equiv.trans {x y z} (h1 : Equiv x y) (h2 : Equiv y z) : Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.equiv.trans PSet.Equiv.trans
protected theorem equiv_of_isEmpty (x y : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] [IsEmpty y.Type] : Equiv x y :=
equiv_iff.2 <| by simp
#align pSet.equiv_of_is_empty PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty
instance setoid : Setoid PSet :=
⟨PSet.Equiv, Equiv.refl, Equiv.symm, Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.setoid PSet.setoid
/-- A pre-set is a subset of another pre-set if every element of the first family is extensionally
equivalent to some element of the second family. -/
protected def Subset (x y : PSet) : Prop :=
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (x.Func a) (y.Func b)
#align pSet.subset PSet.Subset
instance : HasSubset PSet :=
⟨PSet.Subset⟩
instance : IsRefl PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ a => ⟨a, Equiv.refl _⟩⟩
instance : IsTrans PSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun x y z hxy hyz a => by
cases' hxy a with b hb
cases' hyz b with c hc
exact ⟨c, hb.trans hc⟩⟩
theorem Equiv.ext : ∀ x y : PSet, Equiv x y ↔ x ⊆ y ∧ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩,
fun ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨αβ, fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := βα b
⟨a, Equiv.symm h⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv.ext PSet.Equiv.ext
theorem Subset.congr_left : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (x ⊆ z ↔ y ⊆ z)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun αγ b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
let ⟨c, ac⟩ := αγ a
⟨c, (Equiv.symm ba).trans ac⟩,
fun βγ a =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βγ b
⟨c, Equiv.trans ab bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_left PSet.Subset.congr_left
theorem Subset.congr_right : ∀ {x y z : PSet}, Equiv x y → (z ⊆ x ↔ z ⊆ y)
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun γα c =>
let ⟨a, ca⟩ := γα c
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ca.trans ab⟩,
fun γβ c =>
let ⟨b, cb⟩ := γβ c
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨a, cb.trans (Equiv.symm ab)⟩⟩
#align pSet.subset.congr_right PSet.Subset.congr_right
/-- `x ∈ y` as pre-sets if `x` is extensionally equivalent to a member of the family `y`. -/
protected def Mem (x y : PSet.{u}) : Prop :=
∃ b, Equiv x (y.Func b)
#align pSet.mem PSet.Mem
instance : Membership PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.Mem⟩
theorem Mem.mk {α : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (a : α) : A a ∈ mk α A :=
⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩
#align pSet.mem.mk PSet.Mem.mk
theorem func_mem (x : PSet) (i : x.Type) : x.Func i ∈ x := by
cases x
apply Mem.mk
#align pSet.func_mem PSet.func_mem
theorem Mem.ext : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, (∀ w : PSet.{u}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y) → Equiv x y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩, h =>
⟨fun a => (h (A a)).1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := (h (B b)).2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, ha.symm⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.ext PSet.Mem.ext
theorem Mem.congr_right : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y
| ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩, ⟨αβ, βα⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨b, ha.trans hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, hb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨a, hb.euc ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_right PSet.Mem.congr_right
theorem equiv_iff_mem {x y : PSet.{u}} : Equiv x y ↔ ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, w ∈ x ↔ w ∈ y :=
⟨Mem.congr_right,
match x, y with
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ => fun h =>
⟨fun a => h.1 (Mem.mk A a), fun b =>
let ⟨a, h⟩ := h.2 (Mem.mk B b)
⟨a, h.symm⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.equiv_iff_mem PSet.equiv_iff_mem
theorem Mem.congr_left : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → ∀ {w : PSet.{u}}, x ∈ w ↔ y ∈ w
| _, _, h, ⟨_, _⟩ => ⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.symm.trans ha⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨a, h.trans ha⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem.congr_left PSet.Mem.congr_left
private theorem mem_wf_aux : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, Equiv x y → Acc (· ∈ ·) y
| ⟨α, A⟩, ⟨β, B⟩, H =>
⟨_, by
rintro ⟨γ, C⟩ ⟨b, hc⟩
cases' H.exists_right b with a ha
have H := ha.trans hc.symm
rw [mk_func] at H
exact mem_wf_aux H⟩
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
⟨fun x => mem_wf_aux <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.mem_wf PSet.mem_wf
instance : WellFoundedRelation PSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl PSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : PSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align pSet.mem_asymm PSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : PSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align pSet.mem_irrefl PSet.mem_irrefl
/-- Convert a pre-set to a `Set` of pre-sets. -/
def toSet (u : PSet.{u}) : Set PSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align pSet.to_set PSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : PSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.mem_to_set PSet.mem_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : PSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align pSet.nonempty PSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : PSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_def PSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : PSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_of_mem PSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : PSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align pSet.nonempty_to_set_iff PSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
theorem nonempty_type_iff_nonempty {x : PSet} : Nonempty x.Type ↔ PSet.Nonempty x :=
⟨fun ⟨i⟩ => ⟨_, func_mem _ i⟩, fun ⟨_, j, _⟩ => ⟨j⟩⟩
#align pSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty PSet.nonempty_type_iff_nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_type (x : PSet) [h : Nonempty x.Type] : PSet.Nonempty x :=
nonempty_type_iff_nonempty.1 h
#align pSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type PSet.nonempty_of_nonempty_type
/-- Two pre-sets are equivalent iff they have the same members. -/
theorem Equiv.eq {x y : PSet} : Equiv x y ↔ toSet x = toSet y :=
equiv_iff_mem.trans Set.ext_iff.symm
#align pSet.equiv.eq PSet.Equiv.eq
instance : Coe PSet (Set PSet) :=
⟨toSet⟩
/-- The empty pre-set -/
protected def empty : PSet :=
⟨_, PEmpty.elim⟩
#align pSet.empty PSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection PSet :=
⟨PSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited PSet :=
⟨∅⟩
instance : IsEmpty («Type» ∅) :=
⟨PEmpty.elim⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x : PSet.{u}) : x ∉ (∅ : PSet.{u}) :=
IsEmpty.exists_iff.1
#align pSet.not_mem_empty PSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align pSet.to_set_empty PSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : PSet.{u}) : (∅ : PSet) ⊆ x := fun x => x.elim
#align pSet.empty_subset PSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬PSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [PSet.Nonempty]
#align pSet.not_nonempty_empty PSet.not_nonempty_empty
protected theorem equiv_empty (x : PSet) [IsEmpty x.Type] : Equiv x ∅ :=
PSet.equiv_of_isEmpty x _
#align pSet.equiv_empty PSet.equiv_empty
/-- Insert an element into a pre-set -/
protected def insert (x y : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Option y.Type, fun o => Option.casesOn o x y.Func⟩
#align pSet.insert PSet.insert
instance : Insert PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.insert⟩
instance : Singleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun s => insert s ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton PSet PSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
instance (x y : PSet) : Inhabited (insert x y).Type :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited <| Option y.Type)
/-- The n-th von Neumann ordinal -/
def ofNat : ℕ → PSet
| 0 => ∅
| n + 1 => insert (ofNat n) (ofNat n)
#align pSet.of_nat PSet.ofNat
/-- The von Neumann ordinal ω -/
def omega : PSet :=
⟨ULift ℕ, fun n => ofNat n.down⟩
#align pSet.omega PSet.omega
/-- The pre-set separation operation `{x ∈ a | p x}` -/
protected def sep (p : PSet → Prop) (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨{ a // p (x.Func a) }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩
#align pSet.sep PSet.sep
instance : Sep PSet PSet :=
⟨PSet.sep⟩
/-- The pre-set powerset operator -/
def powerset (x : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Set x.Type, fun p => ⟨{ a // p a }, fun y => x.Func y.1⟩⟩
#align pSet.powerset PSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset : ∀ {x y : PSet}, y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, B⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, e⟩ => (Subset.congr_left e).2 fun ⟨a, _⟩ => ⟨a, Equiv.refl (A a)⟩, fun βα =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, Equiv (B b) (A a) }, fun b =>
let ⟨a, ba⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, ba⟩, ba⟩,
fun ⟨_, b, ba⟩ => ⟨b, ba⟩⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_powerset PSet.mem_powerset
/-- The pre-set union operator -/
def sUnion (a : PSet) : PSet :=
⟨Σx, (a.Func x).Type, fun ⟨x, y⟩ => (a.Func x).Func y⟩
#align pSet.sUnion PSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => sUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion : ∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z
| ⟨α, A⟩, y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, c⟩, (e : Equiv y ((A a).Func c))⟩ =>
have : Func (A a) c ∈ mk (A a).Type (A a).Func := Mem.mk (A a).Func c
⟨_, Mem.mk _ _, (Mem.congr_left e).2 (by rwa [eta] at this)⟩,
fun ⟨⟨β, B⟩, ⟨a, (e : Equiv (mk β B) (A a))⟩, ⟨b, yb⟩⟩ => by
rw [← eta (A a)] at e
exact
let ⟨βt, _⟩ := e
let ⟨c, bc⟩ := βt b
⟨⟨a, c⟩, yb.trans bc⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_sUnion PSet.mem_sUnion
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : PSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align pSet.to_set_sUnion PSet.toSet_sUnion
/-- The image of a function from pre-sets to pre-sets. -/
def image (f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}) (x : PSet.{u}) : PSet :=
⟨x.Type, f ∘ x.Func⟩
#align pSet.image PSet.image
-- Porting note: H arguments made explicit.
theorem mem_image {f : PSet.{u} → PSet.{u}} (H : ∀ x y, Equiv x y → Equiv (f x) (f y)) :
∀ {x y : PSet.{u}}, y ∈ image f x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, Equiv y (f z)
| ⟨_, A⟩, _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨A a, Mem.mk A a, ya⟩, fun ⟨_, ⟨a, za⟩, yz⟩ => ⟨a, yz.trans <| H _ _ za⟩⟩
#align pSet.mem_image PSet.mem_image
/-- Universe lift operation -/
protected def Lift : PSet.{u} → PSet.{max u v}
| ⟨α, A⟩ => ⟨ULift.{v, u} α, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift (A x)⟩
#align pSet.lift PSet.Lift
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- Embedding of one universe in another -/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
def embed : PSet.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨ULift.{v, u + 1} PSet, fun ⟨x⟩ => PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x⟩
#align pSet.embed PSet.embed
theorem lift_mem_embed : ∀ x : PSet.{u}, PSet.Lift.{u, max (u + 1) v} x ∈ embed.{u, v} := fun x =>
⟨⟨x⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align pSet.lift_mem_embed PSet.lift_mem_embed
/-- Function equivalence is defined so that `f ~ g` iff `∀ x y, x ~ y → f x ~ g y`. This extends to
equivalence of `n`-ary functions. -/
def Arity.Equiv : ∀ {n}, OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n → Prop
| 0, a, b => PSet.Equiv a b
| _ + 1, a, b => ∀ x y : PSet, PSet.Equiv x y → Arity.Equiv (a x) (b y)
#align pSet.arity.equiv PSet.Arity.Equiv
theorem Arity.equiv_const {a : PSet.{u}} :
∀ n, Arity.Equiv (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n) (OfArity.const PSet.{u} a n)
| 0 => Equiv.rfl
| _ + 1 => fun _ _ _ => Arity.equiv_const _
#align pSet.arity.equiv_const PSet.Arity.equiv_const
/-- `resp n` is the collection of n-ary functions on `PSet` that respect
equivalence, i.e. when the inputs are equivalent the output is as well. -/
def Resp (n) :=
{ x : OfArity PSet.{u} PSet.{u} n // Arity.Equiv x x }
#align pSet.resp PSet.Resp
instance Resp.inhabited {n} : Inhabited (Resp n) :=
⟨⟨OfArity.const _ default _, Arity.equiv_const _⟩⟩
#align pSet.resp.inhabited PSet.Resp.inhabited
/-- The `n`-ary image of a `(n + 1)`-ary function respecting equivalence as a function respecting
equivalence. -/
def Resp.f {n} (f : Resp (n + 1)) (x : PSet) : Resp n :=
⟨f.1 x, f.2 _ _ <| Equiv.refl x⟩
#align pSet.resp.f PSet.Resp.f
/-- Function equivalence for functions respecting equivalence. See `PSet.Arity.Equiv`. -/
def Resp.Equiv {n} (a b : Resp n) : Prop :=
Arity.Equiv a.1 b.1
#align pSet.resp.equiv PSet.Resp.Equiv
@[refl]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.refl {n} (a : Resp n) : Resp.Equiv a a :=
a.2
#align pSet.resp.equiv.refl PSet.Resp.Equiv.refl
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.euc :
∀ {n} {a b c : Resp n}, Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv c b → Resp.Equiv a c
| 0, _, _, _, hab, hcb => PSet.Equiv.euc hab hcb
| n + 1, a, b, c, hab, hcb => fun x y h =>
@Resp.Equiv.euc n (a.f x) (b.f y) (c.f y) (hab _ _ h) (hcb _ _ <| PSet.Equiv.refl y)
#align pSet.resp.equiv.euc PSet.Resp.Equiv.euc
@[symm]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.symm {n} {a b : Resp n} : Resp.Equiv a b → Resp.Equiv b a :=
(Resp.Equiv.refl b).euc
#align pSet.resp.equiv.symm PSet.Resp.Equiv.symm
@[trans]
protected theorem Resp.Equiv.trans {n} {x y z : Resp n} (h1 : Resp.Equiv x y)
(h2 : Resp.Equiv y z) : Resp.Equiv x z :=
h1.euc h2.symm
#align pSet.resp.equiv.trans PSet.Resp.Equiv.trans
instance Resp.setoid {n} : Setoid (Resp n) :=
⟨Resp.Equiv, Resp.Equiv.refl, Resp.Equiv.symm, Resp.Equiv.trans⟩
#align pSet.resp.setoid PSet.Resp.setoid
end PSet
/-- The ZFC universe of sets consists of the type of pre-sets,
quotiented by extensional equivalence. -/
def ZFSet : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient PSet.setoid.{u}
#align Set ZFSet
namespace PSet
namespace Resp
/-- Helper function for `PSet.eval`. -/
def evalAux :
∀ {n},
{ f : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n // ∀ a b : Resp n, Resp.Equiv a b → f a = f b }
| 0 => ⟨fun a => ⟦a.1⟧, fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound h⟩
| n + 1 =>
let F : Resp (n + 1) → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1) := fun a =>
@Quotient.lift _ _ PSet.setoid (fun x => evalAux.1 (a.f x)) fun _ _ h =>
evalAux.2 _ _ (a.2 _ _ h)
⟨F, fun b c h =>
funext <|
(@Quotient.ind _ _ fun q => F b q = F c q) fun z =>
evalAux.2 (Resp.f b z) (Resp.f c z) (h _ _ (PSet.Equiv.refl z))⟩
#align pSet.resp.eval_aux PSet.Resp.evalAux
/-- An equivalence-respecting function yields an n-ary ZFC set function. -/
def eval (n) : Resp n → OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n :=
evalAux.1
#align pSet.resp.eval PSet.Resp.eval
theorem eval_val {n f x} :
(@eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) ⟦x⟧ = eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align pSet.resp.eval_val PSet.Resp.eval_val
end Resp
/-- A set function is "definable" if it is the image of some n-ary pre-set
function. This isn't exactly definability, but is useful as a sufficient
condition for functions that have a computable image. -/
class inductive Definable (n) : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n → Type (u + 1)
| mk (f) : Definable n (Resp.eval n f)
#align pSet.definable PSet.Definable
attribute [instance] Definable.mk
/-- The evaluation of a function respecting equivalence is definable, by that same function. -/
def Definable.EqMk {n} (f) :
∀ {s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n} (_ : Resp.eval _ f = s), Definable n s
| _, rfl => ⟨f⟩
#align pSet.definable.eq_mk PSet.Definable.EqMk
/-- Turns a definable function into a function that respects equivalence. -/
def Definable.Resp {n} : ∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [Definable n s], Resp n
| _, ⟨f⟩ => f
#align pSet.definable.resp PSet.Definable.Resp
theorem Definable.eq {n} :
∀ (s : OfArity ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} n) [H : Definable n s], (@Definable.Resp n s H).eval _ = s
| _, ⟨_⟩ => rfl
#align pSet.definable.eq PSet.Definable.eq
end PSet
namespace Classical
open PSet
/-- All functions are classically definable. -/
noncomputable def allDefinable : ∀ {n} (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n), Definable n F
| 0, F =>
let p := @Quotient.exists_rep PSet _ F
@Definable.EqMk 0 ⟨choose p, Equiv.rfl⟩ _ (choose_spec p)
| n + 1, (F : OfArity ZFSet ZFSet (n + 1)) => by
have I : (x : ZFSet) → Definable n (F x) := fun x => allDefinable (F x)
refine @Definable.EqMk (n + 1) ⟨fun x : PSet => (@Definable.Resp _ _ (I ⟦x⟧)).1, ?_⟩ _ ?_
· dsimp [Arity.Equiv]
intro x y h
rw [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]
exact (Definable.Resp (F ⟦y⟧)).2
refine funext fun q => Quotient.inductionOn q fun x => ?_
simp_rw [Resp.eval_val, Resp.f]
exact @Definable.eq _ (F ⟦x⟧) (I ⟦x⟧)
#align classical.all_definable Classical.allDefinable
end Classical
namespace ZFSet
open PSet
/-- Turns a pre-set into a ZFC set. -/
def mk : PSet → ZFSet :=
Quotient.mk''
#align Set.mk ZFSet.mk
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq (x : PSet) : @Eq ZFSet ⟦x⟧ (mk x) :=
rfl
#align Set.mk_eq ZFSet.mk_eq
@[simp]
theorem mk_out : ∀ x : ZFSet, mk x.out = x :=
Quotient.out_eq
#align Set.mk_out ZFSet.mk_out
theorem eq {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y ↔ Equiv x y :=
Quotient.eq
#align Set.eq ZFSet.eq
theorem sound {x y : PSet} (h : PSet.Equiv x y) : mk x = mk y :=
Quotient.sound h
#align Set.sound ZFSet.sound
theorem exact {x y : PSet} : mk x = mk y → PSet.Equiv x y :=
Quotient.exact
#align Set.exact ZFSet.exact
@[simp]
theorem eval_mk {n f x} :
(@Resp.eval (n + 1) f : ZFSet → OfArity ZFSet ZFSet n) (mk x) = Resp.eval n (Resp.f f x) :=
rfl
#align Set.eval_mk ZFSet.eval_mk
/-- The membership relation for ZFC sets is inherited from the membership relation for pre-sets. -/
protected def Mem : ZFSet → ZFSet → Prop :=
Quotient.lift₂ PSet.Mem fun _ _ _ _ hx hy =>
propext ((Mem.congr_left hx).trans (Mem.congr_right hy))
#align Set.mem ZFSet.Mem
instance : Membership ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_mem_iff {x y : PSet} : mk x ∈ mk y ↔ x ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mk_mem_iff ZFSet.mk_mem_iff
/-- Convert a ZFC set into a `Set` of ZFC sets -/
def toSet (u : ZFSet.{u}) : Set ZFSet.{u} :=
{ x | x ∈ u }
#align Set.to_set ZFSet.toSet
@[simp]
theorem mem_toSet (a u : ZFSet.{u}) : a ∈ u.toSet ↔ a ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.mem_to_set ZFSet.mem_toSet
instance small_toSet (x : ZFSet.{u}) : Small.{u} x.toSet :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun a => by
let f : a.Type → (mk a).toSet := fun i => ⟨mk <| a.Func i, func_mem a i⟩
suffices Function.Surjective f by exact small_of_surjective this
rintro ⟨y, hb⟩
induction y using Quotient.inductionOn
cases' hb with i h
exact ⟨i, Subtype.coe_injective (Quotient.sound h.symm)⟩
#align Set.small_to_set ZFSet.small_toSet
/-- A nonempty set is one that contains some element. -/
protected def Nonempty (u : ZFSet) : Prop :=
u.toSet.Nonempty
#align Set.nonempty ZFSet.Nonempty
theorem nonempty_def (u : ZFSet) : u.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ u :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_def ZFSet.nonempty_def
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x u : ZFSet} (h : x ∈ u) : u.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_of_mem ZFSet.nonempty_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_toSet_iff {u : ZFSet} : u.toSet.Nonempty ↔ u.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.nonempty_to_set_iff ZFSet.nonempty_toSet_iff
/-- `x ⊆ y` as ZFC sets means that all members of `x` are members of `y`. -/
protected def Subset (x y : ZFSet.{u}) :=
∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y
#align Set.subset ZFSet.Subset
instance hasSubset : HasSubset ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Subset⟩
#align Set.has_subset ZFSet.hasSubset
theorem subset_def {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ⊆ y ↔ ∀ ⦃z⦄, z ∈ x → z ∈ y :=
Iff.rfl
#align Set.subset_def ZFSet.subset_def
instance : IsRefl ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => id⟩
instance : IsTrans ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hxy hyz _ ha => hyz (hxy ha)⟩
@[simp]
theorem subset_iff : ∀ {x y : PSet}, mk x ⊆ mk y ↔ x ⊆ y
| ⟨_, A⟩, ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨fun h a => @h ⟦A a⟧ (Mem.mk A a), fun h z =>
Quotient.inductionOn z fun _ ⟨a, za⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := h a
⟨b, za.trans ab⟩⟩
#align Set.subset_iff ZFSet.subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem toSet_subset_iff {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet ⊆ y.toSet ↔ x ⊆ y := by
simp [subset_def, Set.subset_def]
#align Set.to_set_subset_iff ZFSet.toSet_subset_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : (∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y) → x = y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ h => Quotient.sound (Mem.ext fun w => h ⟦w⟧)
#align Set.ext ZFSet.ext
theorem ext_iff {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x = y ↔ ∀ z : ZFSet.{u}, z ∈ x ↔ z ∈ y :=
⟨fun h => by simp [h], ext⟩
#align Set.ext_iff ZFSet.ext_iff
theorem toSet_injective : Function.Injective toSet := fun _ _ h => ext <| Set.ext_iff.1 h
#align Set.to_set_injective ZFSet.toSet_injective
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inj {x y : ZFSet} : x.toSet = y.toSet ↔ x = y :=
toSet_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.to_set_inj ZFSet.toSet_inj
instance : IsAntisymm ZFSet (· ⊆ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ hab hba => ext fun c => ⟨@hab c, @hba c⟩⟩
/-- The empty ZFC set -/
protected def empty : ZFSet :=
mk ∅
#align Set.empty ZFSet.empty
instance : EmptyCollection ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.empty⟩
instance : Inhabited ZFSet :=
⟨∅⟩
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (x) : x ∉ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) :=
Quotient.inductionOn x PSet.not_mem_empty
#align Set.not_mem_empty ZFSet.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem toSet_empty : toSet ∅ = ∅ := by simp [toSet]
#align Set.to_set_empty ZFSet.toSet_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (∅ : ZFSet) ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => subset_iff.2 <| PSet.empty_subset y
#align Set.empty_subset ZFSet.empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬ZFSet.Nonempty ∅ := by simp [ZFSet.Nonempty]
#align Set.not_nonempty_empty ZFSet.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk_iff {x : PSet} : (mk x).Nonempty ↔ x.Nonempty := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨mk a, h⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, h⟩
induction a using Quotient.inductionOn
exact ⟨_, h⟩
#align Set.nonempty_mk_iff ZFSet.nonempty_mk_iff
theorem eq_empty (x : ZFSet.{u}) : x = ∅ ↔ ∀ y : ZFSet.{u}, y ∉ x := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp
#align Set.eq_empty ZFSet.eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : u = ∅ ∨ u.Nonempty := by
rw [eq_empty, ← not_exists]
apply em'
#align Set.eq_empty_or_nonempty ZFSet.eq_empty_or_nonempty
/-- `Insert x y` is the set `{x} ∪ y` -/
protected def Insert : ZFSet → ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 2
⟨PSet.insert, fun _ _ uv ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun o =>
match o with
| some a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨some b, hb⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩,
fun o =>
match o with
| some b =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨some a, ha⟩
| none => ⟨none, uv⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.insert ZFSet.Insert
instance : Insert ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.Insert⟩
instance : Singleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun x => insert x ∅⟩
instance : LawfulSingleton ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert_iff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ insert y z ↔ x = y ∨ x ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ x y z fun x y ⟨α, A⟩ =>
show (x ∈ PSet.mk (Option α) fun o => Option.rec y A o) ↔ mk x = mk y ∨ x ∈ PSet.mk α A from
⟨fun m =>
match m with
| ⟨some a, ha⟩ => Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩
| ⟨none, h⟩ => Or.inl (Quotient.sound h),
fun m =>
match m with
| Or.inr ⟨a, ha⟩ => ⟨some a, ha⟩
| Or.inl h => ⟨none, Quotient.exact h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_insert_iff ZFSet.mem_insert_iff
theorem mem_insert (x y : ZFSet) : x ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inl rfl
#align Set.mem_insert ZFSet.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_of_mem {y z : ZFSet} (x) (h : z ∈ y) : z ∈ insert x y :=
mem_insert_iff.2 <| Or.inr h
#align Set.mem_insert_of_mem ZFSet.mem_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem toSet_insert (x y : ZFSet) : (insert x y).toSet = insert x y.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_insert ZFSet.toSet_insert
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ @singleton ZFSet.{u} ZFSet.{u} _ y ↔ x = y :=
Iff.trans mem_insert_iff
⟨fun o => Or.rec (fun h => h) (fun n => absurd n (not_mem_empty _)) o, Or.inl⟩
#align Set.mem_singleton ZFSet.mem_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_singleton (x : ZFSet) : ({x} : ZFSet).toSet = {x} := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_singleton ZFSet.toSet_singleton
theorem insert_nonempty (u v : ZFSet) : (insert u v).Nonempty :=
⟨u, mem_insert u v⟩
#align Set.insert_nonempty ZFSet.insert_nonempty
theorem singleton_nonempty (u : ZFSet) : ZFSet.Nonempty {u} :=
insert_nonempty u ∅
#align Set.singleton_nonempty ZFSet.singleton_nonempty
theorem mem_pair {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : x ∈ ({y, z} : ZFSet) ↔ x = y ∨ x = z := by
simp
#align Set.mem_pair ZFSet.mem_pair
/-- `omega` is the first infinite von Neumann ordinal -/
def omega : ZFSet :=
mk PSet.omega
#align Set.omega ZFSet.omega
@[simp]
theorem omega_zero : ∅ ∈ omega :=
⟨⟨0⟩, Equiv.rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_zero ZFSet.omega_zero
@[simp]
theorem omega_succ {n} : n ∈ omega.{u} → insert n n ∈ omega.{u} :=
Quotient.inductionOn n fun x ⟨⟨n⟩, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨n + 1⟩,
ZFSet.exact <|
show insert (mk x) (mk x) = insert (mk <| ofNat n) (mk <| ofNat n) by
rw [ZFSet.sound h]
rfl⟩
#align Set.omega_succ ZFSet.omega_succ
/-- `{x ∈ a | p x}` is the set of elements in `a` satisfying `p` -/
protected def sep (p : ZFSet → Prop) : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sep fun y => p (mk y), fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, by simpa only [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound hb]⟩, hb⟩,
fun ⟨b, pb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, by simpa only [mk_func, ZFSet.sound ha]⟩, ha⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sep ZFSet.sep
-- Porting note: the { x | p x } notation appears to be disabled in Lean 4.
instance : Sep ZFSet ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.sep⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_sep {p : ZFSet.{u} → Prop} {x y : ZFSet.{u}} :
y ∈ ZFSet.sep p x ↔ y ∈ x ∧ p y :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ y =>
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, h⟩ => ⟨⟨a, h⟩, by rwa [@Quotient.sound PSet _ _ _ h]⟩, fun ⟨⟨a, h⟩, pa⟩ =>
⟨⟨a, by
rw [mk_func] at h
rwa [mk_func, ← ZFSet.sound h]⟩,
h⟩⟩
#align Set.mem_sep ZFSet.mem_sep
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sep (a : ZFSet) (p : ZFSet → Prop) :
(ZFSet.sep p a).toSet = { x ∈ a.toSet | p x } := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sep ZFSet.toSet_sep
/-- The powerset operation, the collection of subsets of a ZFC set -/
def powerset : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.powerset, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨fun p =>
⟨{ b | ∃ a, p a ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨a, pa⟩ =>
let ⟨b, ab⟩ := αβ a
⟨⟨b, a, pa, ab⟩, ab⟩,
fun ⟨_, a, pa, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨a, pa⟩, ab⟩⟩,
fun q =>
⟨{ a | ∃ b, q b ∧ Equiv (A a) (B b) }, fun ⟨_, b, qb, ab⟩ => ⟨⟨b, qb⟩, ab⟩, fun ⟨b, qb⟩ =>
let ⟨a, ab⟩ := βα b
⟨⟨a, b, qb, ab⟩, ab⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.powerset ZFSet.powerset
@[simp]
theorem mem_powerset {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ powerset x ↔ y ⊆ x :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨α, A⟩ ⟨β, B⟩ =>
show (⟨β, B⟩ : PSet.{u}) ∈ PSet.powerset.{u} ⟨α, A⟩ ↔ _ by simp [mem_powerset, subset_iff]
#align Set.mem_powerset ZFSet.mem_powerset
theorem sUnion_lem {α β : Type u} (A : α → PSet) (B : β → PSet) (αβ : ∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv (A a) (B b)) :
∀ a, ∃ b, Equiv ((sUnion ⟨α, A⟩).Func a) ((sUnion ⟨β, B⟩).Func b)
| ⟨a, c⟩ => by
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := αβ a
induction' ea : A a with γ Γ
induction' eb : B b with δ Δ
rw [ea, eb] at hb
cases' hb with γδ δγ
let c : (A a).Type := c
let ⟨d, hd⟩ := γδ (by rwa [ea] at c)
use ⟨b, Eq.ndrec d (Eq.symm eb)⟩
change PSet.Equiv ((A a).Func c) ((B b).Func (Eq.ndrec d eb.symm))
match A a, B b, ea, eb, c, d, hd with
| _, _, rfl, rfl, _, _, hd => exact hd
#align Set.sUnion_lem ZFSet.sUnion_lem
/-- The union operator, the collection of elements of elements of a ZFC set -/
def sUnion : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.sUnion, fun ⟨_, A⟩ ⟨_, B⟩ ⟨αβ, βα⟩ =>
⟨sUnion_lem A B αβ, fun a =>
Exists.elim
(sUnion_lem B A (fun b => Exists.elim (βα b) fun c hc => ⟨c, PSet.Equiv.symm hc⟩) a)
fun b hb => ⟨b, PSet.Equiv.symm hb⟩⟩⟩
#align Set.sUnion ZFSet.sUnion
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋃₀ " => ZFSet.sUnion
/-- The intersection operator, the collection of elements in all of the elements of a ZFC set. We
special-case `⋂₀ ∅ = ∅`. -/
noncomputable def sInter (x : ZFSet) : ZFSet := by
classical exact if h : x.Nonempty then ZFSet.sep (fun y => ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z) h.some else ∅
#align Set.sInter ZFSet.sInter
@[inherit_doc]
prefix:110 "⋂₀ " => ZFSet.sInter
@[simp]
theorem mem_sUnion {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : y ∈ ⋃₀ x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, y ∈ z :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun _ _ =>
Iff.trans PSet.mem_sUnion
⟨fun ⟨z, h⟩ => ⟨⟦z⟧, h⟩, fun ⟨z, h⟩ => Quotient.inductionOn z (fun z h => ⟨z, h⟩) h⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion ZFSet.mem_sUnion
theorem mem_sInter {x y : ZFSet} (h : x.Nonempty) : y ∈ ⋂₀ x ↔ ∀ z ∈ x, y ∈ z := by
rw [sInter, dif_pos h]
simp only [mem_toSet, mem_sep, and_iff_right_iff_imp]
exact fun H => H _ h.some_mem
#align Set.mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_sInter
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_empty : ⋃₀ (∅ : ZFSet.{u}) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
#align Set.sUnion_empty ZFSet.sUnion_empty
@[simp]
theorem sInter_empty : ⋂₀ (∅ : ZFSet) = ∅ := dif_neg <| by simp
#align Set.sInter_empty ZFSet.sInter_empty
theorem mem_of_mem_sInter {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ ⋂₀ x) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ z := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty x with (rfl | hx)
· exact (not_mem_empty z hz).elim
· exact (mem_sInter hx).1 hy z hz
#align Set.mem_of_mem_sInter ZFSet.mem_of_mem_sInter
theorem mem_sUnion_of_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : y ∈ ⋃₀ x :=
mem_sUnion.2 ⟨z, hz, hy⟩
#align Set.mem_sUnion_of_mem ZFSet.mem_sUnion_of_mem
theorem not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem {x y z : ZFSet} (hy : ¬y ∈ z) (hz : z ∈ x) : ¬y ∈ ⋂₀ x :=
fun hx => hy <| mem_of_mem_sInter hx hz
#align Set.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem ZFSet.not_mem_sInter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sUnion, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left]
#align Set.sUnion_singleton ZFSet.sUnion_singleton
@[simp]
theorem sInter_singleton {x : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋂₀ ({x} : ZFSet) = x :=
ext fun y => by simp_rw [mem_sInter (singleton_nonempty x), mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align Set.sInter_singleton ZFSet.sInter_singleton
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sUnion (x : ZFSet.{u}) : (⋃₀ x).toSet = ⋃₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sUnion ZFSet.toSet_sUnion
theorem toSet_sInter {x : ZFSet.{u}} (h : x.Nonempty) : (⋂₀ x).toSet = ⋂₀ (toSet '' x.toSet) := by
ext
simp [mem_sInter h]
#align Set.to_set_sInter ZFSet.toSet_sInter
theorem singleton_injective : Function.Injective (@singleton ZFSet ZFSet _) := fun x y H => by
let this := congr_arg sUnion H
rwa [sUnion_singleton, sUnion_singleton] at this
#align Set.singleton_injective ZFSet.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj {x y : ZFSet} : ({x} : ZFSet) = {y} ↔ x = y :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align Set.singleton_inj ZFSet.singleton_inj
/-- The binary union operation -/
protected def union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
⋃₀ {x, y}
#align Set.union ZFSet.union
/-- The binary intersection operation -/
protected def inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∈ y }
#align Set.inter ZFSet.inter
/-- The set difference operation -/
protected def diff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x -- { z ∈ x | z ∉ y }
#align Set.diff ZFSet.diff
instance : Union ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.union⟩
instance : Inter ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.inter⟩
instance : SDiff ZFSet :=
⟨ZFSet.diff⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSet_union (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∪ y).toSet = x.toSet ∪ y.toSet := by
change (⋃₀ {x, y}).toSet = _
simp
#align Set.to_set_union ZFSet.toSet_union
@[simp]
theorem toSet_inter (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x ∩ y).toSet = x.toSet ∩ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∈ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_inter ZFSet.toSet_inter
@[simp]
theorem toSet_sdiff (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (x \ y).toSet = x.toSet \ y.toSet := by
change (ZFSet.sep (fun z => z ∉ y) x).toSet = _
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_sdiff ZFSet.toSet_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem mem_union {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∪ y ↔ z ∈ x ∨ z ∈ y := by
rw [← mem_toSet]
simp
#align Set.mem_union ZFSet.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x ∩ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∈ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∈ y) x z
#align Set.mem_inter ZFSet.mem_inter
@[simp]
theorem mem_diff {x y z : ZFSet.{u}} : z ∈ x \ y ↔ z ∈ x ∧ z ∉ y :=
@mem_sep (fun z : ZFSet.{u} => z ∉ y) x z
#align Set.mem_diff ZFSet.mem_diff
@[simp]
theorem sUnion_pair {x y : ZFSet.{u}} : ⋃₀ ({x, y} : ZFSet.{u}) = x ∪ y :=
rfl
#align Set.sUnion_pair ZFSet.sUnion_pair
theorem mem_wf : @WellFounded ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
(wellFounded_lift₂_iff (H := fun a b c d hx hy =>
propext ((@Mem.congr_left a c hx).trans (@Mem.congr_right b d hy _)))).mpr PSet.mem_wf
#align Set.mem_wf ZFSet.mem_wf
/-- Induction on the `∈` relation. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {p : ZFSet → Prop} (x) (h : ∀ x, (∀ y ∈ x, p y) → p x) : p x :=
mem_wf.induction x h
#align Set.induction_on ZFSet.inductionOn
instance : WellFoundedRelation ZFSet :=
⟨_, mem_wf⟩
instance : IsAsymm ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isAsymm
-- Porting note: this can't be inferred automatically for some reason.
instance : IsIrrefl ZFSet (· ∈ ·) :=
mem_wf.isIrrefl
theorem mem_asymm {x y : ZFSet} : x ∈ y → y ∉ x :=
asymm
#align Set.mem_asymm ZFSet.mem_asymm
theorem mem_irrefl (x : ZFSet) : x ∉ x :=
irrefl x
#align Set.mem_irrefl ZFSet.mem_irrefl
theorem regularity (x : ZFSet.{u}) (h : x ≠ ∅) : ∃ y ∈ x, x ∩ y = ∅ :=
by_contradiction fun ne =>
h <| (eq_empty x).2 fun y =>
@inductionOn (fun z => z ∉ x) y fun z IH zx =>
ne ⟨z, zx, (eq_empty _).2 fun w wxz =>
let ⟨wx, wz⟩ := mem_inter.1 wxz
IH w wz wx⟩
#align Set.regularity ZFSet.regularity
/-- The image of a (definable) ZFC set function -/
def image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [Definable 1 f] : ZFSet → ZFSet :=
let ⟨r, hr⟩ := @Definable.Resp 1 f _
Resp.eval 1
⟨PSet.image r, fun _ _ e =>
Mem.ext fun _ =>
(mem_image hr).trans <|
Iff.trans
⟨fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).1 h1, h2⟩, fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ =>
⟨w, (Mem.congr_right e).2 h1, h2⟩⟩ <|
(mem_image hr).symm⟩
#align Set.image ZFSet.image
theorem image.mk :
∀ (f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}) [H : Definable 1 f] (x) {y} (_ : y ∈ x), f y ∈ @image f H x
| _, ⟨F⟩, x, y => Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, _⟩ _ ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨a, F.2 _ _ ya⟩
#align Set.image.mk ZFSet.image.mk
@[simp]
theorem mem_image :
∀ {f : ZFSet.{u} → ZFSet.{u}} [H : Definable 1 f] {x y : ZFSet.{u}},
y ∈ @image f H x ↔ ∃ z ∈ x, f z = y
| _, ⟨_⟩, x, y =>
Quotient.inductionOn₂ x y fun ⟨_, A⟩ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨a, ya⟩ => ⟨⟦A a⟧, Mem.mk A a, Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ya⟩, fun ⟨_, hz, e⟩ =>
e ▸ image.mk _ _ hz⟩
#align Set.mem_image ZFSet.mem_image
@[simp]
theorem toSet_image (f : ZFSet → ZFSet) [H : Definable 1 f] (x : ZFSet) :
(image f x).toSet = f '' x.toSet := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_image ZFSet.toSet_image
/-- The range of an indexed family of sets. The universes allow for a more general index type
without manual use of `ULift`. -/
noncomputable def range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) : ZFSet.{max u v} :=
⟦⟨ULift.{v} α, Quotient.out ∘ f ∘ ULift.down⟩⟧
#align Set.range ZFSet.range
@[simp]
theorem mem_range {α : Type u} {f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}} {x : ZFSet.{max u v}} :
x ∈ range.{u, v} f ↔ x ∈ Set.range f :=
Quotient.inductionOn x fun y => by
constructor
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
exact ⟨z.down, Quotient.eq_mk_iff_out.2 hz.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨z, hz⟩
use ULift.up z
simpa [hz] using PSet.Equiv.symm (Quotient.mk_out y)
#align Set.mem_range ZFSet.mem_range
@[simp]
theorem toSet_range {α : Type u} (f : α → ZFSet.{max u v}) :
(range.{u, v} f).toSet = Set.range f := by
ext
simp
#align Set.to_set_range ZFSet.toSet_range
/-- Kuratowski ordered pair -/
def pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : ZFSet.{u} :=
{{x}, {x, y}}
#align Set.pair ZFSet.pair
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/ZFC/Basic.lean | 1,252 | 1,252 | theorem toSet_pair (x y : ZFSet.{u}) : (pair x y).toSet = {{x}, {x, y}} := by | simp [pair]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Degrees
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Fin
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.equiv from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Equivalences between polynomial rings
This file establishes a number of equivalences between polynomial rings,
based on equivalences between the underlying types.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
## Tags
equivalence, isomorphism, morphism, ring hom, hom
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section Equiv
variable (R) [CommSemiring R]
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a single variable and
polynomials over the ground ring.
-/
@[simps]
def pUnitAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial PUnit R ≃ₐ[R] R[X] where
toFun := eval₂ Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
invFun := Polynomial.eval₂ MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
left_inv := by
let f : R[X] →+* MvPolynomial PUnit R := Polynomial.eval₂RingHom MvPolynomial.C (X PUnit.unit)
let g : MvPolynomial PUnit R →+* R[X] := eval₂Hom Polynomial.C fun _ => Polynomial.X
show ∀ p, f.comp g p = p
apply is_id
· ext a
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_C, Polynomial.eval₂_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩
dsimp [f, g]
rw [eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_X]
right_inv p :=
Polynomial.induction_on p (fun a => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_C, MvPolynomial.eval₂_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by rw [Polynomial.eval₂_add, MvPolynomial.eval₂_add, hp, hq]) fun p n _ => by
rw [Polynomial.eval₂_mul, Polynomial.eval₂_pow, Polynomial.eval₂_X, Polynomial.eval₂_C,
eval₂_mul, eval₂_C, eval₂_pow, eval₂_X]
map_mul' _ _ := eval₂_mul _ _
map_add' _ _ := eval₂_add _ _
commutes' _ := eval₂_C _ _ _
#align mv_polynomial.punit_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.pUnitAlgEquiv
section Map
variable {R} (σ)
/-- If `e : A ≃+* B` is an isomorphism of rings, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapEquiv [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
MvPolynomial σ S₁ ≃+* MvPolynomial σ S₂ :=
{ map (e : S₁ →+* S₂) with
toFun := map (e : S₁ →+* S₂)
invFun := map (e.symm : S₂ →+* S₁)
left_inv := map_leftInverse e.left_inv
right_inv := map_rightInverse e.right_inv }
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv MvPolynomial.mapEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_refl : mapEquiv σ (RingEquiv.refl R) = RingEquiv.refl _ :=
RingEquiv.ext map_id
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_refl MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_symm [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂) :
(mapEquiv σ e).symm = mapEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_symm MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapEquiv_trans [CommSemiring S₁] [CommSemiring S₂] [CommSemiring S₃] (e : S₁ ≃+* S₂)
(f : S₂ ≃+* S₃) : (mapEquiv σ e).trans (mapEquiv σ f) = mapEquiv σ (e.trans f) :=
RingEquiv.ext fun p => by
simp only [RingEquiv.coe_trans, comp_apply, mapEquiv_apply, RingEquiv.coe_ringHom_trans,
map_map]
#align mv_polynomial.map_equiv_trans MvPolynomial.mapEquiv_trans
variable {A₁ A₂ A₃ : Type*} [CommSemiring A₁] [CommSemiring A₂] [CommSemiring A₃]
variable [Algebra R A₁] [Algebra R A₂] [Algebra R A₃]
/-- If `e : A ≃ₐ[R] B` is an isomorphism of `R`-algebras, then so is `map e`. -/
@[simps apply]
def mapAlgEquiv (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : MvPolynomial σ A₁ ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ A₂ :=
{ mapAlgHom (e : A₁ →ₐ[R] A₂), mapEquiv σ (e : A₁ ≃+* A₂) with toFun := map (e : A₁ →+* A₂) }
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_refl : mapAlgEquiv σ (AlgEquiv.refl : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₁) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext map_id
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_refl MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_refl
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_symm (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) : (mapAlgEquiv σ e).symm = mapAlgEquiv σ e.symm :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_symm MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_symm
@[simp]
theorem mapAlgEquiv_trans (e : A₁ ≃ₐ[R] A₂) (f : A₂ ≃ₐ[R] A₃) :
(mapAlgEquiv σ e).trans (mapAlgEquiv σ f) = mapAlgEquiv σ (e.trans f) := by
ext
simp only [AlgEquiv.trans_apply, mapAlgEquiv_apply, map_map]
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.map_alg_equiv_trans MvPolynomial.mapAlgEquiv_trans
end Map
section
variable (S₁ S₂ S₃)
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
to multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def sumToIter : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R →+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
eval₂Hom (C.comp C) fun bc => Sum.recOn bc X (C ∘ X)
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter MvPolynomial.sumToIter
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_C (a : R) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (C a) = C (C a) :=
eval₂_C _ _ a
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_C MvPolynomial.sumToIter_C
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xl (b : S₁) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inl b)) = X b :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inl b)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xl MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xl
@[simp]
theorem sumToIter_Xr (c : S₂) : sumToIter R S₁ S₂ (X (Sum.inr c)) = C (X c) :=
eval₂_X _ _ (Sum.inr c)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.sum_to_iter_Xr MvPolynomial.sumToIter_Xr
/-- The function from multivariable polynomials in one type,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in another type,
to multivariable polynomials in the sum of the two types.
See `sumRingEquiv` for the ring isomorphism.
-/
def iterToSum : MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) →+* MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R :=
eval₂Hom (eval₂Hom C (X ∘ Sum.inr)) (X ∘ Sum.inl)
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum MvPolynomial.iterToSum
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_C (a : R) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (C a)) = C a :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (C a)) (eval₂_C _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_C MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_C
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_X (b : S₁) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (X b) = X (Sum.inl b) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_X
@[simp]
theorem iterToSum_C_X (c : S₂) : iterToSum R S₁ S₂ (C (X c)) = X (Sum.inr c) :=
Eq.trans (eval₂_C _ _ (X c)) (eval₂_X _ _ _)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.iter_to_sum_C_X MvPolynomial.iterToSum_C_X
variable (σ)
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps!]
def isEmptyAlgEquiv [he : IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] R :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (aeval (IsEmpty.elim he)) (Algebra.ofId _ _)
(by ext)
(by
ext i m
exact IsEmpty.elim' he i)
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyAlgEquiv
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in no variables
and the ground ring. -/
@[simps!]
def isEmptyRingEquiv [IsEmpty σ] : MvPolynomial σ R ≃+* R :=
(isEmptyAlgEquiv R σ).toRingEquiv
#align mv_polynomial.is_empty_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.isEmptyRingEquiv
variable {σ}
/-- A helper function for `sumRingEquiv`. -/
@[simps]
def mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial [CommSemiring S₃] (f : MvPolynomial S₁ R →+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃)
(g : MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ →+* MvPolynomial S₁ R) (hfgC : (f.comp g).comp C = C)
(hfgX : ∀ n, f (g (X n)) = X n) (hgfC : (g.comp f).comp C = C) (hgfX : ∀ n, g (f (X n)) = X n) :
MvPolynomial S₁ R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₂ S₃ where
toFun := f
invFun := g
left_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hgfC hgfX
right_inv := is_id (RingHom.comp _ _) hfgC hfgX
map_mul' := f.map_mul
map_add' := f.map_add
#align mv_polynomial.mv_polynomial_equiv_mv_polynomial MvPolynomial.mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial
/-- The ring isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
def sumRingEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃+* MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) := by
apply mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial R (Sum S₁ S₂) _ _ (sumToIter R S₁ S₂) (iterToSum R S₁ S₂)
· refine RingHom.ext (hom_eq_hom _ _ ?hC ?hX)
case hC => ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_C, sumToIter_C]
case hX => intro; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, iterToSum_C_X, sumToIter_Xr]
· simp [iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xl]
· ext1; simp only [RingHom.comp_apply, sumToIter_C, iterToSum_C_C]
· rintro ⟨⟩ <;> simp only [sumToIter_Xl, iterToSum_X, sumToIter_Xr, iterToSum_C_X]
#align mv_polynomial.sum_ring_equiv MvPolynomial.sumRingEquiv
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in a sum of two types,
and multivariable polynomials in one of the types,
with coefficients in multivariable polynomials in the other type.
-/
@[simps!]
def sumAlgEquiv : MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R) :=
{ sumRingEquiv R S₁ S₂ with
commutes' := by
intro r
have A : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial S₁ (MvPolynomial S₂ R)) r = (C (C r) : _) := rfl
have B : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial (Sum S₁ S₂) R) r = C r := rfl
simp only [sumRingEquiv, mvPolynomialEquivMvPolynomial, Equiv.toFun_as_coe,
Equiv.coe_fn_mk, B, sumToIter_C, A] }
#align mv_polynomial.sum_alg_equiv MvPolynomial.sumAlgEquiv
section
-- this speeds up typeclass search in the lemma below
attribute [local instance] IsScalarTower.right
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
polynomials with coefficients in `MvPolynomial S₁ R`.
-/
@[simps!]
def optionEquivLeft : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial S₁ R) :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim Polynomial.X fun s => Polynomial.C (X s))
(Polynomial.aevalTower (MvPolynomial.rename some) (X none))
(by ext : 2 <;> simp) (by ext i : 2; cases i <;> simp)
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_left MvPolynomial.optionEquivLeft
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X (some x)) = Polynomial.C (X x) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_X_none : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (X none) = Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivLeft_C (r : R) : optionEquivLeft R S₁ (C r) = Polynomial.C (C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, Polynomial.algebraMap_apply, algebraMap_eq]
end
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Option S₁` and
multivariable polynomials with coefficients in polynomials.
-/
@[simps!]
def optionEquivRight : MvPolynomial (Option S₁) R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial S₁ R[X] :=
AlgEquiv.ofAlgHom (MvPolynomial.aeval fun o => o.elim (C Polynomial.X) X)
(MvPolynomial.aevalTower (Polynomial.aeval (X none)) fun i => X (Option.some i))
(by
ext : 2 <;>
simp only [MvPolynomial.algebraMap_eq, Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, AlgHom.id_comp,
IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', comp_apply, aevalTower_C, Polynomial.aeval_X, aeval_X,
Option.elim', aevalTower_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, eq_self_iff_true, imp_true_iff])
(by
ext ⟨i⟩ : 2 <;>
simp only [Option.elim, AlgHom.coe_comp, comp_apply, aeval_X, aevalTower_C,
Polynomial.aeval_X, AlgHom.coe_id, id, aevalTower_X])
#align mv_polynomial.option_equiv_right MvPolynomial.optionEquivRight
lemma optionEquivRight_X_some (x : S₁) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X (some x)) = X x := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_X_none : optionEquivRight R S₁ (X none) = C Polynomial.X := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_X]
lemma optionEquivRight_C (r : R) : optionEquivRight R S₁ (C r) = C (Polynomial.C r) := by
simp only [optionEquivRight_apply, aeval_C, algebraMap_apply, Polynomial.algebraMap_eq]
variable (n : ℕ)
/-- The algebra isomorphism between multivariable polynomials in `Fin (n + 1)` and
polynomials over multivariable polynomials in `Fin n`.
-/
def finSuccEquiv : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R ≃ₐ[R] Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) :=
(renameEquiv R (_root_.finSuccEquiv n)).trans (optionEquivLeft R (Fin n))
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv
theorem finSuccEquiv_eq :
(finSuccEquiv R n : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R →+* Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R)) fun i : Fin (n + 1) =>
Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i := by
ext i : 2
· simp only [finSuccEquiv, optionEquivLeft_apply, aeval_C, AlgEquiv.coe_trans, RingHom.coe_coe,
coe_eval₂Hom, comp_apply, renameEquiv_apply, eval₂_C, RingHom.coe_comp, rename_C]
rfl
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [finSuccEquiv]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_eq MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_eq
@[simp]
theorem finSuccEquiv_apply (p : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) :
finSuccEquiv R n p =
eval₂Hom (Polynomial.C.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n) R))
(fun i : Fin (n + 1) => Fin.cases Polynomial.X (fun k => Polynomial.C (X k)) i) p := by
rw [← finSuccEquiv_eq, RingHom.coe_coe]
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_apply MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply
theorem finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R] (n : ℕ) :
(↑(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).symm : Polynomial (MvPolynomial (Fin n) R) →+* _).comp
(Polynomial.C.comp MvPolynomial.C) =
(MvPolynomial.C : R →+* MvPolynomial (Fin n.succ) R) := by
refine RingHom.ext fun x => ?_
rw [RingHom.comp_apply]
refine
(MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).injective
(Trans.trans ((MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv R n).apply_symm_apply _) ?_)
simp only [MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_apply, MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_comp_C_eq_C MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_comp_C_eq_C
variable {n} {R}
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_zero : finSuccEquiv R n (X 0) = Polynomial.X := by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_X_zero MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_X_zero
theorem finSuccEquiv_X_succ {j : Fin n} : finSuccEquiv R n (X j.succ) = Polynomial.C (X j) := by
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.fin_succ_equiv_X_succ MvPolynomial.finSuccEquiv_X_succ
/-- The coefficient of `m` in the `i`-th coefficient of `finSuccEquiv R n f` equals the
coefficient of `Finsupp.cons i m` in `f`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Equiv.lean | 384 | 405 | theorem finSuccEquiv_coeff_coeff (m : Fin n →₀ ℕ) (f : MvPolynomial (Fin (n + 1)) R) (i : ℕ) :
coeff m (Polynomial.coeff (finSuccEquiv R n f) i) = coeff (m.cons i) f := by |
induction' f using MvPolynomial.induction_on' with j r p q hp hq generalizing i m
swap
· simp only [(finSuccEquiv R n).map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add, coeff_add, hp, hq]
simp only [finSuccEquiv_apply, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_monomial, RingHom.coe_comp, prod_pow,
Polynomial.coeff_C_mul, coeff_C_mul, coeff_monomial, Fin.prod_univ_succ, Fin.cases_zero,
Fin.cases_succ, ← map_prod, ← RingHom.map_pow, Function.comp_apply]
rw [← mul_boole, mul_comm (Polynomial.X ^ j 0), Polynomial.coeff_C_mul_X_pow]; congr 1
obtain rfl | hjmi := eq_or_ne j (m.cons i)
· simpa only [cons_zero, cons_succ, if_pos rfl, monomial_eq, C_1, one_mul, prod_pow] using
coeff_monomial m m (1 : R)
· simp only [hjmi, if_false]
obtain hij | rfl := ne_or_eq i (j 0)
· simp only [hij, if_false, coeff_zero]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, if_true]
have hmj : m ≠ j.tail := by
rintro rfl
rw [cons_tail] at hjmi
contradiction
simpa only [monomial_eq, C_1, one_mul, prod_pow, Finsupp.tail_apply, if_neg hmj.symm] using
coeff_monomial m j.tail (1 : R)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.SplitSimplicialObject
import Mathlib.AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.PInfty
#align_import algebraic_topology.dold_kan.functor_gamma from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"32a7e535287f9c73f2e4d2aef306a39190f0b504"
/-!
# Construction of the inverse functor of the Dold-Kan equivalence
In this file, we construct the functor `Γ₀ : ChainComplex C ℕ ⥤ SimplicialObject C`
which shall be the inverse functor of the Dold-Kan equivalence in the case of abelian categories,
and more generally pseudoabelian categories.
By definition, when `K` is a chain_complex, `Γ₀.obj K` is a simplicial object which
sends `Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ` to a certain coproduct indexed by the set
`Splitting.IndexSet Δ` whose elements consists of epimorphisms `e : Δ.unop ⟶ Δ'.unop`
(with `Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ`); the summand attached to such an `e` is `K.X Δ'.unop.len`.
By construction, `Γ₀.obj K` is a split simplicial object whose splitting is `Γ₀.splitting K`.
We also construct `Γ₂ : Karoubi (ChainComplex C ℕ) ⥤ Karoubi (SimplicialObject C)`
which shall be an equivalence for any additive category `C`.
(See `Equivalence.lean` for the general strategy of proof of the Dold-Kan equivalence.)
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits SimplexCategory
SimplicialObject Opposite CategoryTheory.Idempotents Simplicial DoldKan
namespace AlgebraicTopology
namespace DoldKan
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Preadditive C] (K K' : ChainComplex C ℕ) (f : K ⟶ K')
{Δ Δ' Δ'' : SimplexCategory}
/-- `Isδ₀ i` is a simple condition used to check whether a monomorphism `i` in
`SimplexCategory` identifies to the coface map `δ 0`. -/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def Isδ₀ {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategory} (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] : Prop :=
Δ.len = Δ'.len + 1 ∧ i.toOrderHom 0 ≠ 0
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀
namespace Isδ₀
theorem iff {j : ℕ} {i : Fin (j + 2)} : Isδ₀ (SimplexCategory.δ i) ↔ i = 0 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, h₂⟩
by_contra h
exact h₂ (Fin.succAbove_ne_zero_zero h)
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, by dsimp; exact Fin.succ_ne_zero (0 : Fin (j + 1))⟩
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀.iff AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀.iff
theorem eq_δ₀ {n : ℕ} {i : ([n] : SimplexCategory) ⟶ [n + 1]} [Mono i] (hi : Isδ₀ i) :
i = SimplexCategory.δ 0 := by
obtain ⟨j, rfl⟩ := SimplexCategory.eq_δ_of_mono i
rw [iff] at hi
rw [hi]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.is_δ₀.eq_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Isδ₀.eq_δ₀
end Isδ₀
namespace Γ₀
namespace Obj
/-- In the definition of `(Γ₀.obj K).obj Δ` as a direct sum indexed by `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ`,
the summand `summand K Δ A` is `K.X A.1.len`. -/
def summand (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) : C :=
K.X A.1.unop.len
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.summand AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.summand
/-- The functor `Γ₀` sends a chain complex `K` to the simplicial object which
sends `Δ` to the direct sum of the objects `summand K Δ A` for all `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` -/
def obj₂ (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) (Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ) [HasFiniteCoproducts C] : C :=
∐ fun A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ => summand K Δ A
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.obj₂ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.obj₂
namespace Termwise
/-- A monomorphism `i : Δ' ⟶ Δ` induces a morphism `K.X Δ.len ⟶ K.X Δ'.len` which
is the identity if `Δ = Δ'`, the differential on the complex `K` if `i = δ 0`, and
zero otherwise. -/
def mapMono (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) {Δ' Δ : SimplexCategory} (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] :
K.X Δ.len ⟶ K.X Δ'.len := by
by_cases Δ = Δ'
· exact eqToHom (by congr)
· by_cases Isδ₀ i
· exact K.d Δ.len Δ'.len
· exact 0
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono
variable (Δ)
theorem mapMono_id : mapMono K (𝟙 Δ) = 𝟙 _ := by
unfold mapMono
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, eqToHom_refl, dite_eq_ite, if_true]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_id AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id
variable {Δ}
theorem mapMono_δ₀' (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] (hi : Isδ₀ i) : mapMono K i = K.d Δ.len Δ'.len := by
unfold mapMono
suffices Δ ≠ Δ' by
simp only [dif_neg this, dif_pos hi]
rintro rfl
simpa only [self_eq_add_right, Nat.one_ne_zero] using hi.1
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_δ₀' AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_δ₀'
@[simp]
theorem mapMono_δ₀ {n : ℕ} : mapMono K (δ (0 : Fin (n + 2))) = K.d (n + 1) n :=
mapMono_δ₀' K _ (by rw [Isδ₀.iff])
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_δ₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_δ₀
theorem mapMono_eq_zero (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i] (h₁ : Δ ≠ Δ') (h₂ : ¬Isδ₀ i) : mapMono K i = 0 := by
unfold mapMono
rw [Ne] at h₁
split_ifs
rfl
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_eq_zero AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_eq_zero
variable {K K'}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mapMono_naturality (i : Δ ⟶ Δ') [Mono i] :
mapMono K i ≫ f.f Δ.len = f.f Δ'.len ≫ mapMono K' i := by
unfold mapMono
split_ifs with h
· subst h
simp only [id_comp, eqToHom_refl, comp_id]
· rw [HomologicalComplex.Hom.comm]
· rw [zero_comp, comp_zero]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_naturality AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_naturality
variable (K)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem mapMono_comp (i' : Δ'' ⟶ Δ') (i : Δ' ⟶ Δ) [Mono i'] [Mono i] :
mapMono K i ≫ mapMono K i' = mapMono K (i' ≫ i) := by
-- case where i : Δ' ⟶ Δ is the identity
by_cases h₁ : Δ = Δ'
· subst h₁
simp only [SimplexCategory.eq_id_of_mono i, comp_id, id_comp, mapMono_id K, eqToHom_refl]
-- case where i' : Δ'' ⟶ Δ' is the identity
by_cases h₂ : Δ' = Δ''
· subst h₂
simp only [SimplexCategory.eq_id_of_mono i', comp_id, id_comp, mapMono_id K, eqToHom_refl]
-- then the RHS is always zero
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt (len_lt_of_mono i h₁)
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_lt (len_lt_of_mono i' h₂)
have eq : Δ.len = Δ''.len + (k + k' + 2) := by omega
rw [mapMono_eq_zero K (i' ≫ i) _ _]; rotate_left
· by_contra h
simp only [self_eq_add_right, h, add_eq_zero_iff, and_false] at eq
· by_contra h
simp only [h.1, add_right_inj] at eq
omega
-- in all cases, the LHS is also zero, either by definition, or because d ≫ d = 0
by_cases h₃ : Isδ₀ i
· by_cases h₄ : Isδ₀ i'
· rw [mapMono_δ₀' K i h₃, mapMono_δ₀' K i' h₄, HomologicalComplex.d_comp_d]
· simp only [mapMono_eq_zero K i' h₂ h₄, comp_zero]
· simp only [mapMono_eq_zero K i h₁ h₃, zero_comp]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.termwise.map_mono_comp AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_comp
end Termwise
variable [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
/-- The simplicial morphism on the simplicial object `Γ₀.obj K` induced by
a morphism `Δ' → Δ` in `SimplexCategory` is defined on each summand
associated to an `A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ` in terms of the epi-mono factorisation
of `θ ≫ A.e`. -/
def map (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) {Δ' Δ : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') : obj₂ K Δ ⟶ obj₂ K Δ' :=
Sigma.desc fun A =>
Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K Δ') (A.pull θ)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map
@[reassoc]
theorem map_on_summand₀ {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) {θ : Δ ⟶ Δ'}
{Δ'' : SimplexCategory} {e : Δ'.unop ⟶ Δ''} {i : Δ'' ⟶ A.1.unop} [Epi e] [Mono i]
(fac : e ≫ i = θ.unop ≫ A.e) :
Sigma.ι (summand K Δ) A ≫ map K θ =
Termwise.mapMono K i ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K Δ') (Splitting.IndexSet.mk e) := by
simp only [map, colimit.ι_desc, Cofan.mk_ι_app]
have h := SimplexCategory.image_eq fac
subst h
congr
· exact SimplexCategory.image_ι_eq fac
· dsimp only [SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.pull]
congr
exact SimplexCategory.factorThruImage_eq fac
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand₀ AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀
@[reassoc]
theorem map_on_summand₀' {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') :
Sigma.ι (summand K Δ) A ≫ map K θ =
Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫ Sigma.ι (summand K _) (A.pull θ) :=
map_on_summand₀ K A (A.fac_pull θ)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand₀' AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀'
end Obj
variable [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
/-- The functor `Γ₀ : ChainComplex C ℕ ⥤ SimplicialObject C`, on objects. -/
@[simps]
def obj (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) : SimplicialObject C where
obj Δ := Obj.obj₂ K Δ
map θ := Obj.map K θ
map_id Δ := colimit.hom_ext (fun ⟨A⟩ => by
dsimp
have fac : A.e ≫ 𝟙 A.1.unop = (𝟙 Δ).unop ≫ A.e := by rw [unop_id, comp_id, id_comp]
erw [Obj.map_on_summand₀ K A fac, Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id, id_comp, comp_id]
rfl)
map_comp {Δ'' Δ' Δ} θ' θ := colimit.hom_ext (fun ⟨A⟩ => by
have fac : θ.unop ≫ θ'.unop ≫ A.e = (θ' ≫ θ).unop ≫ A.e := by rw [unop_comp, assoc]
rw [← image.fac (θ'.unop ≫ A.e), ← assoc, ←
image.fac (θ.unop ≫ factorThruImage (θ'.unop ≫ A.e)), assoc] at fac
simp only [Obj.map_on_summand₀'_assoc K A θ', Obj.map_on_summand₀' K _ θ,
Obj.Termwise.mapMono_comp_assoc, Obj.map_on_summand₀ K A fac]
rfl)
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.obj
/-- By construction, the simplicial `Γ₀.obj K` is equipped with a splitting. -/
def splitting (K : ChainComplex C ℕ) : SimplicialObject.Splitting (Γ₀.obj K) where
N n := K.X n
ι n := Sigma.ι (Γ₀.Obj.summand K (op [n])) (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op [n]))
isColimit' Δ := IsColimit.ofIsoColimit (colimit.isColimit _) (Cofan.ext (Iso.refl _) (by
intro A
dsimp [Splitting.cofan']
rw [comp_id, Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (SimplicialObject.Splitting.IndexSet.id A.1)
(show A.e ≫ 𝟙 _ = A.e.op.unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by rfl), Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono_id]
dsimp
rw [id_comp]
rfl))
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.splitting AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.splitting
@[reassoc]
theorem Obj.map_on_summand {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ')
{Δ'' : SimplexCategory} {e : Δ'.unop ⟶ Δ''} {i : Δ'' ⟶ A.1.unop} [Epi e] [Mono i]
(fac : e ≫ i = θ.unop ≫ A.e) :
((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan Δ).inj A ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map θ =
Γ₀.Obj.Termwise.mapMono K i ≫ ((Γ₀.splitting K).cofan Δ').inj (Splitting.IndexSet.mk e) := by
dsimp [Splitting.cofan]
change (_ ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map A.e.op) ≫ (Γ₀.obj K).map θ = _
rw [assoc, ← Functor.map_comp]
dsimp [splitting]
erw [Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (Splitting.IndexSet.id A.1)
(show e ≫ i = ((Splitting.IndexSet.e A).op ≫ θ).unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by rw [comp_id, fac]; rfl),
Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand₀ K (Splitting.IndexSet.id (op Δ''))
(show e ≫ 𝟙 Δ'' = e.op.unop ≫ 𝟙 _ by simp), Termwise.mapMono_id, id_comp]
#align algebraic_topology.dold_kan.Γ₀.obj.map_on_summand AlgebraicTopology.DoldKan.Γ₀.Obj.map_on_summand
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/AlgebraicTopology/DoldKan/FunctorGamma.lean | 266 | 271 | theorem Obj.map_on_summand' {Δ Δ' : SimplexCategoryᵒᵖ} (A : Splitting.IndexSet Δ) (θ : Δ ⟶ Δ') :
((splitting K).cofan Δ).inj A ≫ (obj K).map θ =
Obj.Termwise.mapMono K (image.ι (θ.unop ≫ A.e)) ≫
((splitting K).cofan Δ').inj (A.pull θ) := by |
apply Obj.map_on_summand
apply image.fac
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Ray
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Real
#align_import analysis.normed_space.ray from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"92ca63f0fb391a9ca5f22d2409a6080e786d99f7"
/-!
# Rays in a real normed vector space
In this file we prove some lemmas about the `SameRay` predicate in case of a real normed space. In
this case, for two vectors `x y` in the same ray, the norm of their sum is equal to the sum of their
norms and `‖y‖ • x = ‖x‖ • y`.
-/
open Real
variable {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
namespace SameRay
variable {x y : E}
/-- If `x` and `y` are on the same ray, then the triangle inequality becomes the equality: the norm
of `x + y` is the sum of the norms of `x` and `y`. The converse is true for a strictly convex
space. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Ray.lean | 32 | 35 | theorem norm_add (h : SameRay ℝ x y) : ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by |
rcases h.exists_eq_smul with ⟨u, a, b, ha, hb, -, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [← add_smul, norm_smul_of_nonneg (add_nonneg ha hb), norm_smul_of_nonneg ha,
norm_smul_of_nonneg hb, add_mul]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Lift
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
#align_import topology.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e354e865255654389cc46e6032160238df2e0f40"
/-!
# Basic theory of topological spaces.
The main definition is the type class `TopologicalSpace X` which endows a type `X` with a topology.
Then `Set X` gets predicates `IsOpen`, `IsClosed` and functions `interior`, `closure` and
`frontier`. Each point `x` of `X` gets a neighborhood filter `𝓝 x`. A filter `F` on `X` has
`x` as a cluster point if `ClusterPt x F : 𝓝 x ⊓ F ≠ ⊥`. A map `f : α → X` clusters at `x`
along `F : Filter α` if `MapClusterPt x F f : ClusterPt x (map f F)`. In particular
the notion of cluster point of a sequence `u` is `MapClusterPt x atTop u`.
For topological spaces `X` and `Y`, a function `f : X → Y` and a point `x : X`,
`ContinuousAt f x` means `f` is continuous at `x`, and global continuity is
`Continuous f`. There is also a version of continuity `PContinuous` for
partially defined functions.
## Notation
The following notation is introduced elsewhere and it heavily used in this file.
* `𝓝 x`: the filter `nhds x` of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`;
* `𝓝[≠] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x {x}ᶜ` of punctured neighborhoods of `x`.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space, interior, closure, frontier, neighborhood, continuity, continuous function
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter
universe u v w x
/-!
### Topological spaces
-/
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
#align topological_space.of_closed TopologicalSpace.ofClosed
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {α β : Type*}
{x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
open Topology
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
#align is_open_mk isOpen_mk
@[ext]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
#align topological_space_eq TopologicalSpace.ext
section
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
end
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h s => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
#align topological_space_eq_iff TopologicalSpace.ext_iff
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
#align is_open_fold isOpen_fold
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Union isOpen_iUnion
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
#align is_open_bUnion isOpen_biUnion
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
#align is_open.union IsOpen.union
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
#align is_open_empty isOpen_empty
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) :
(∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) → IsOpen (⋂₀ s) :=
Finite.induction_on hs (fun _ => by rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ) fun _ _ ih h => by
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
#align is_open_sInter Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
#align is_open_bInter Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
#align is_open_Inter isOpen_iInter_of_finite
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_open_bInter_finset isOpen_biInter_finset
@[simp] -- Porting note: added `simp`
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
#align is_open_const isOpen_const
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
#align is_open.and IsOpen.and
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
#align is_open_compl_iff isOpen_compl_iff
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_empty isClosed_empty
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
#align is_closed_univ isClosed_univ
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
#align is_closed.union IsClosed.union
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
#align is_closed_sInter isClosed_sInter
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
#align is_closed_Inter isClosed_iInter
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
#align is_closed_bInter isClosed_biInter
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
#align is_closed_compl_iff isClosed_compl_iff
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
#align is_open.is_closed_compl IsOpen.isClosed_compl
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
#align is_open.sdiff IsOpen.sdiff
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
#align is_closed.inter IsClosed.inter
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
#align is_closed.sdiff IsClosed.sdiff
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
#align is_closed_bUnion Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
#align is_closed_Union isClosed_iUnion_of_finite
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
#align is_closed_imp isClosed_imp
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
#align is_closed.not IsClosed.not
/-!
### Interior of a set
-/
theorem mem_interior : x ∈ interior s ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
simp only [interior, mem_sUnion, mem_setOf_eq, and_assoc, and_left_comm]
#align mem_interior mem_interiorₓ
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_interior : IsOpen (interior s) :=
isOpen_sUnion fun _ => And.left
#align is_open_interior isOpen_interior
theorem interior_subset : interior s ⊆ s :=
sUnion_subset fun _ => And.right
#align interior_subset interior_subset
theorem interior_maximal (h₁ : t ⊆ s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : t ⊆ interior s :=
subset_sUnion_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align interior_maximal interior_maximal
theorem IsOpen.interior_eq (h : IsOpen s) : interior s = s :=
interior_subset.antisymm (interior_maximal (Subset.refl s) h)
#align is_open.interior_eq IsOpen.interior_eq
theorem interior_eq_iff_isOpen : interior s = s ↔ IsOpen s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isOpen_interior, IsOpen.interior_eq⟩
#align interior_eq_iff_is_open interior_eq_iff_isOpen
theorem subset_interior_iff_isOpen : s ⊆ interior s ↔ IsOpen s := by
simp only [interior_eq_iff_isOpen.symm, Subset.antisymm_iff, interior_subset, true_and]
#align subset_interior_iff_is_open subset_interior_iff_isOpen
theorem IsOpen.subset_interior_iff (h₁ : IsOpen s) : s ⊆ interior t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h => Subset.trans h interior_subset, fun h₂ => interior_maximal h₂ h₁⟩
#align is_open.subset_interior_iff IsOpen.subset_interior_iff
theorem subset_interior_iff : t ⊆ interior s ↔ ∃ U, IsOpen U ∧ t ⊆ U ∧ U ⊆ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨interior s, isOpen_interior, h, interior_subset⟩, fun ⟨_U, hU, htU, hUs⟩ =>
htU.trans (interior_maximal hUs hU)⟩
#align subset_interior_iff subset_interior_iff
lemma interior_subset_iff : interior s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U ⊆ s → U ⊆ t := by
simp [interior]
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem interior_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : interior s ⊆ interior t :=
interior_maximal (Subset.trans interior_subset h) isOpen_interior
#align interior_mono interior_mono
@[simp]
theorem interior_empty : interior (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isOpen_empty.interior_eq
#align interior_empty interior_empty
@[simp]
theorem interior_univ : interior (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isOpen_univ.interior_eq
#align interior_univ interior_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_eq_univ : interior s = univ ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => univ_subset_iff.mp <| h.symm.trans_le interior_subset, fun h => h.symm ▸ interior_univ⟩
#align interior_eq_univ interior_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem interior_interior : interior (interior s) = interior s :=
isOpen_interior.interior_eq
#align interior_interior interior_interior
@[simp]
theorem interior_inter : interior (s ∩ t) = interior s ∩ interior t :=
(Monotone.map_inf_le (fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono) s t).antisymm <|
interior_maximal (inter_subset_inter interior_subset interior_subset) <|
isOpen_interior.inter isOpen_interior
#align interior_inter interior_inter
theorem Set.Finite.interior_biInter {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
hs.induction_on (by simp) <| by intros; simp [*]
theorem Set.Finite.interior_sInter {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
interior (⋂₀ S) = ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := by
rw [sInter_eq_biInter, hS.interior_biInter]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.interior_iInter {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋂ i ∈ s, interior (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.interior_biInter f
#align finset.interior_Inter Finset.interior_iInter
@[simp]
theorem interior_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
interior (⋂ i, f i) = ⋂ i, interior (f i) := by
rw [← sInter_range, (finite_range f).interior_sInter, biInter_range]
#align interior_Inter interior_iInter_of_finite
theorem interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty (h₁ : IsClosed s)
(h₂ : interior t = ∅) : interior (s ∪ t) = interior s :=
have : interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s := fun x ⟨u, ⟨(hu₁ : IsOpen u), (hu₂ : u ⊆ s ∪ t)⟩, (hx₁ : x ∈ u)⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun hx₂ : x ∉ s =>
have : u \ s ⊆ t := fun x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Or.resolve_left (hu₂ h₁) h₂
have : u \ s ⊆ interior t := by rwa [(IsOpen.sdiff hu₁ h₁).subset_interior_iff]
have : u \ s ⊆ ∅ := by rwa [h₂] at this
this ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
Subset.antisymm (interior_maximal this isOpen_interior) (interior_mono subset_union_left)
#align interior_union_is_closed_of_interior_empty interior_union_isClosed_of_interior_empty
theorem isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t := by
rw [← subset_interior_iff_isOpen]
simp only [subset_def, mem_interior]
#align is_open_iff_forall_mem_open isOpen_iff_forall_mem_open
theorem interior_iInter_subset (s : ι → Set X) : interior (⋂ i, s i) ⊆ ⋂ i, interior (s i) :=
subset_iInter fun _ => interior_mono <| iInter_subset _ _
#align interior_Inter_subset interior_iInter_subset
theorem interior_iInter₂_subset (p : ι → Sort*) (s : ∀ i, p i → Set X) :
interior (⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), interior (s i j) :=
(interior_iInter_subset _).trans <| iInter_mono fun _ => interior_iInter_subset _
#align interior_Inter₂_subset interior_iInter₂_subset
theorem interior_sInter_subset (S : Set (Set X)) : interior (⋂₀ S) ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s :=
calc
interior (⋂₀ S) = interior (⋂ s ∈ S, s) := by rw [sInter_eq_biInter]
_ ⊆ ⋂ s ∈ S, interior s := interior_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align interior_sInter_subset interior_sInter_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' interior).HasBasis p fun i => interior (s i) :=
h.lift' fun _ _ ↦ interior_mono
theorem Filter.lift'_interior_le (l : Filter X) : l.lift' interior ≤ l := fun _s hs ↦
mem_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_interior_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (ho : ∀ i, p i → IsOpen (s i)) : l.lift' interior = l :=
le_antisymm l.lift'_interior_le <| h.lift'_interior.ge_iff.2 fun i hi ↦ by
simpa only [(ho i hi).interior_eq] using h.mem_of_mem hi
/-!
### Closure of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_closure : IsClosed (closure s) :=
isClosed_sInter fun _ => And.left
#align is_closed_closure isClosed_closure
theorem subset_closure : s ⊆ closure s :=
subset_sInter fun _ => And.right
#align subset_closure subset_closure
theorem not_mem_of_not_mem_closure {P : X} (hP : P ∉ closure s) : P ∉ s := fun h =>
hP (subset_closure h)
#align not_mem_of_not_mem_closure not_mem_of_not_mem_closure
theorem closure_minimal (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t :=
sInter_subset_of_mem ⟨h₂, h₁⟩
#align closure_minimal closure_minimal
theorem Disjoint.closure_left (hd : Disjoint s t) (ht : IsOpen t) :
Disjoint (closure s) t :=
disjoint_compl_left.mono_left <| closure_minimal hd.subset_compl_right ht.isClosed_compl
#align disjoint.closure_left Disjoint.closure_left
theorem Disjoint.closure_right (hd : Disjoint s t) (hs : IsOpen s) :
Disjoint s (closure t) :=
(hd.symm.closure_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.closure_right Disjoint.closure_right
theorem IsClosed.closure_eq (h : IsClosed s) : closure s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (closure_minimal (Subset.refl s) h) subset_closure
#align is_closed.closure_eq IsClosed.closure_eq
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : closure s ⊆ s :=
closure_minimal (Subset.refl _) hs
#align is_closed.closure_subset IsClosed.closure_subset
theorem IsClosed.closure_subset_iff (h₁ : IsClosed t) : closure s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
⟨Subset.trans subset_closure, fun h => closure_minimal h h₁⟩
#align is_closed.closure_subset_iff IsClosed.closure_subset_iff
theorem IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset (hs : IsClosed s) :
x ∈ s ↔ closure ({x} : Set X) ⊆ s :=
(hs.closure_subset_iff.trans Set.singleton_subset_iff).symm
#align is_closed.mem_iff_closure_subset IsClosed.mem_iff_closure_subset
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem closure_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : closure s ⊆ closure t :=
closure_minimal (Subset.trans h subset_closure) isClosed_closure
#align closure_mono closure_mono
theorem monotone_closure (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Monotone (@closure X _) := fun _ _ =>
closure_mono
#align monotone_closure monotone_closure
theorem diff_subset_closure_iff : s \ t ⊆ closure t ↔ s ⊆ closure t := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, union_eq_self_of_subset_left subset_closure]
#align diff_subset_closure_iff diff_subset_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_subset_inter_closure (s t : Set X) :
closure (s ∩ t) ⊆ closure s ∩ closure t :=
(monotone_closure X).map_inf_le s t
#align closure_inter_subset_inter_closure closure_inter_subset_inter_closure
theorem isClosed_of_closure_subset (h : closure s ⊆ s) : IsClosed s := by
rw [subset_closure.antisymm h]; exact isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_of_closure_subset isClosed_of_closure_subset
theorem closure_eq_iff_isClosed : closure s = s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ isClosed_closure, IsClosed.closure_eq⟩
#align closure_eq_iff_is_closed closure_eq_iff_isClosed
theorem closure_subset_iff_isClosed : closure s ⊆ s ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨isClosed_of_closure_subset, IsClosed.closure_subset⟩
#align closure_subset_iff_is_closed closure_subset_iff_isClosed
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty : closure (∅ : Set X) = ∅ :=
isClosed_empty.closure_eq
#align closure_empty closure_empty
@[simp]
theorem closure_empty_iff (s : Set X) : closure s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
⟨subset_eq_empty subset_closure, fun h => h.symm ▸ closure_empty⟩
#align closure_empty_iff closure_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem closure_nonempty_iff : (closure s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by
simp only [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, closure_empty_iff]
#align closure_nonempty_iff closure_nonempty_iff
alias ⟨Set.Nonempty.of_closure, Set.Nonempty.closure⟩ := closure_nonempty_iff
#align set.nonempty.of_closure Set.Nonempty.of_closure
#align set.nonempty.closure Set.Nonempty.closure
@[simp]
theorem closure_univ : closure (univ : Set X) = univ :=
isClosed_univ.closure_eq
#align closure_univ closure_univ
@[simp]
theorem closure_closure : closure (closure s) = closure s :=
isClosed_closure.closure_eq
#align closure_closure closure_closure
theorem closure_eq_compl_interior_compl : closure s = (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [interior, closure, compl_sUnion, compl_image_set_of]
simp only [compl_subset_compl, isOpen_compl_iff]
#align closure_eq_compl_interior_compl closure_eq_compl_interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_union : closure (s ∪ t) = closure s ∪ closure t := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, compl_inter]
#align closure_union closure_union
theorem Set.Finite.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Finite) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, hs.interior_biInter]
theorem Set.Finite.closure_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hS : S.Finite) :
closure (⋃₀ S) = ⋃ s ∈ S, closure s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hS.closure_biUnion]
@[simp]
theorem Finset.closure_biUnion {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, closure (f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.closure_biUnion f
#align finset.closure_bUnion Finset.closure_biUnion
@[simp]
theorem closure_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] (f : ι → Set X) :
closure (⋃ i, f i) = ⋃ i, closure (f i) := by
rw [← sUnion_range, (finite_range _).closure_sUnion, biUnion_range]
#align closure_Union closure_iUnion_of_finite
theorem interior_subset_closure : interior s ⊆ closure s :=
Subset.trans interior_subset subset_closure
#align interior_subset_closure interior_subset_closure
@[simp]
theorem interior_compl : interior sᶜ = (closure s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align interior_compl interior_compl
@[simp]
theorem closure_compl : closure sᶜ = (interior s)ᶜ := by
simp [closure_eq_compl_interior_compl]
#align closure_compl closure_compl
theorem mem_closure_iff :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ o, IsOpen o → x ∈ o → (o ∩ s).Nonempty :=
⟨fun h o oo ao =>
by_contradiction fun os =>
have : s ⊆ oᶜ := fun x xs xo => os ⟨x, xo, xs⟩
closure_minimal this (isClosed_compl_iff.2 oo) h ao,
fun H _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
by_contradiction fun nc =>
let ⟨_, hc, hs⟩ := H _ h₁.isOpen_compl nc
hc (h₂ hs)⟩
#align mem_closure_iff mem_closure_iff
theorem closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff (h : IsOpen t) :
(closure s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨_x, hxcs, hxt⟩ => inter_comm t s ▸ mem_closure_iff.1 hxcs t h hxt, fun h =>
h.mono <| inf_le_inf_right t subset_closure⟩
#align closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff closure_inter_open_nonempty_iff
theorem Filter.le_lift'_closure (l : Filter X) : l ≤ l.lift' closure :=
le_lift'.2 fun _ h => mem_of_superset h subset_closure
#align filter.le_lift'_closure Filter.le_lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) : (l.lift' closure).HasBasis p fun i => closure (s i) :=
h.lift' (monotone_closure X)
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure
theorem Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self {l : Filter X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : l.HasBasis p s) (hc : ∀ i, p i → IsClosed (s i)) : l.lift' closure = l :=
le_antisymm (h.ge_iff.2 fun i hi => (hc i hi).closure_eq ▸ mem_lift' (h.mem_of_mem hi))
l.le_lift'_closure
#align filter.has_basis.lift'_closure_eq_self Filter.HasBasis.lift'_closure_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot {l : Filter X} : l.lift' closure = ⊥ ↔ l = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique <| h ▸ l.le_lift'_closure, fun h =>
h.symm ▸ by rw [lift'_bot (monotone_closure _), closure_empty, principal_empty]⟩
#align filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot Filter.lift'_closure_eq_bot
theorem dense_iff_closure_eq : Dense s ↔ closure s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.symm
#align dense_iff_closure_eq dense_iff_closure_eq
alias ⟨Dense.closure_eq, _⟩ := dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense.closure_eq Dense.closure_eq
theorem interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl : interior s = ∅ ↔ Dense sᶜ := by
rw [dense_iff_closure_eq, closure_compl, compl_univ_iff]
#align interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl
theorem Dense.interior_compl (h : Dense s) : interior sᶜ = ∅ :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 <| by rwa [compl_compl]
#align dense.interior_compl Dense.interior_compl
/-- The closure of a set `s` is dense if and only if `s` is dense. -/
@[simp]
theorem dense_closure : Dense (closure s) ↔ Dense s := by
rw [Dense, Dense, closure_closure]
#align dense_closure dense_closure
protected alias ⟨_, Dense.closure⟩ := dense_closure
alias ⟨Dense.of_closure, _⟩ := dense_closure
#align dense.of_closure Dense.of_closure
#align dense.closure Dense.closure
@[simp]
theorem dense_univ : Dense (univ : Set X) := fun _ => subset_closure trivial
#align dense_univ dense_univ
/-- A set is dense if and only if it has a nonempty intersection with each nonempty open set. -/
theorem dense_iff_inter_open :
Dense s ↔ ∀ U, IsOpen U → U.Nonempty → (U ∩ s).Nonempty := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rintro U U_op ⟨x, x_in⟩
exact mem_closure_iff.1 (h _) U U_op x_in
· intro x
rw [mem_closure_iff]
intro U U_op x_in
exact h U U_op ⟨_, x_in⟩
#align dense_iff_inter_open dense_iff_inter_open
alias ⟨Dense.inter_open_nonempty, _⟩ := dense_iff_inter_open
#align dense.inter_open_nonempty Dense.inter_open_nonempty
theorem Dense.exists_mem_open (hs : Dense s) {U : Set X} (ho : IsOpen U)
(hne : U.Nonempty) : ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ U :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho hne
⟨x, hx.2, hx.1⟩
#align dense.exists_mem_open Dense.exists_mem_open
theorem Dense.nonempty_iff (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty ↔ Nonempty X :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ =>
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs.inter_open_nonempty _ isOpen_univ ⟨x, trivial⟩
⟨y, hy.2⟩⟩
#align dense.nonempty_iff Dense.nonempty_iff
theorem Dense.nonempty [h : Nonempty X] (hs : Dense s) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.nonempty_iff.2 h
#align dense.nonempty Dense.nonempty
@[mono]
theorem Dense.mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hd : Dense s₁) : Dense s₂ := fun x =>
closure_mono h (hd x)
#align dense.mono Dense.mono
/-- Complement to a singleton is dense if and only if the singleton is not an open set. -/
theorem dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open :
Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) ↔ ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) := by
constructor
· intro hd ho
exact (hd.inter_open_nonempty _ ho (singleton_nonempty _)).ne_empty (inter_compl_self _)
· refine fun ho => dense_iff_inter_open.2 fun U hU hne => inter_compl_nonempty_iff.2 fun hUx => ?_
obtain rfl : U = {x} := eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem.2 ⟨hne, hUx⟩
exact ho hU
#align dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open
/-!
### Frontier of a set
-/
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_interior (s : Set X) : closure s \ interior s = frontier s :=
rfl
#align closure_diff_interior closure_diff_interior
/-- Interior and frontier are disjoint. -/
lemma disjoint_interior_frontier : Disjoint (interior s) (frontier s) := by
rw [disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty, ← closure_diff_interior, diff_eq,
← inter_assoc, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, compl_inter_self, empty_inter]
@[simp]
theorem closure_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right_self, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset_closure]
#align closure_diff_frontier closure_diff_frontier
@[simp]
theorem self_diff_frontier (s : Set X) : s \ frontier s = interior s := by
rw [frontier, diff_diff_right, diff_eq_empty.2 subset_closure,
inter_eq_self_of_subset_right interior_subset, empty_union]
#align self_diff_frontier self_diff_frontier
theorem frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure : frontier s = closure s ∩ closure sᶜ := by
rw [closure_compl, frontier, diff_eq]
#align frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure
theorem frontier_subset_closure : frontier s ⊆ closure s :=
diff_subset
#align frontier_subset_closure frontier_subset_closure
theorem IsClosed.frontier_subset (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s ⊆ s :=
frontier_subset_closure.trans hs.closure_eq.subset
#align is_closed.frontier_subset IsClosed.frontier_subset
theorem frontier_closure_subset : frontier (closure s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff closure_closure.subset <| interior_mono subset_closure
#align frontier_closure_subset frontier_closure_subset
theorem frontier_interior_subset : frontier (interior s) ⊆ frontier s :=
diff_subset_diff (closure_mono interior_subset) interior_interior.symm.subset
#align frontier_interior_subset frontier_interior_subset
/-- The complement of a set has the same frontier as the original set. -/
@[simp]
theorem frontier_compl (s : Set X) : frontier sᶜ = frontier s := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_compl, inter_comm]
#align frontier_compl frontier_compl
@[simp]
theorem frontier_univ : frontier (univ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_univ frontier_univ
@[simp]
theorem frontier_empty : frontier (∅ : Set X) = ∅ := by simp [frontier]
#align frontier_empty frontier_empty
theorem frontier_inter_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∩ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure t ∪ closure s ∩ frontier t := by
simp only [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure, compl_inter, closure_union]
refine (inter_subset_inter_left _ (closure_inter_subset_inter_closure s t)).trans_eq ?_
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, inter_assoc,
inter_comm (closure t)]
#align frontier_inter_subset frontier_inter_subset
theorem frontier_union_subset (s t : Set X) :
frontier (s ∪ t) ⊆ frontier s ∩ closure tᶜ ∪ closure sᶜ ∩ frontier t := by
simpa only [frontier_compl, ← compl_union] using frontier_inter_subset sᶜ tᶜ
#align frontier_union_subset frontier_union_subset
theorem IsClosed.frontier_eq (hs : IsClosed s) : frontier s = s \ interior s := by
rw [frontier, hs.closure_eq]
#align is_closed.frontier_eq IsClosed.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : frontier s = closure s \ s := by
rw [frontier, hs.interior_eq]
#align is_open.frontier_eq IsOpen.frontier_eq
theorem IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∩ frontier s = ∅ := by
rw [hs.frontier_eq, inter_diff_self]
#align is_open.inter_frontier_eq IsOpen.inter_frontier_eq
/-- The frontier of a set is closed. -/
theorem isClosed_frontier : IsClosed (frontier s) := by
rw [frontier_eq_closure_inter_closure]; exact IsClosed.inter isClosed_closure isClosed_closure
#align is_closed_frontier isClosed_frontier
/-- The frontier of a closed set has no interior point. -/
theorem interior_frontier (h : IsClosed s) : interior (frontier s) = ∅ := by
have A : frontier s = s \ interior s := h.frontier_eq
have B : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s := by rw [A]; exact interior_mono diff_subset
have C : interior (frontier s) ⊆ frontier s := interior_subset
have : interior (frontier s) ⊆ interior s ∩ (s \ interior s) :=
subset_inter B (by simpa [A] using C)
rwa [inter_diff_self, subset_empty_iff] at this
#align interior_frontier interior_frontier
theorem closure_eq_interior_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = interior s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel interior_subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_interior_union_frontier closure_eq_interior_union_frontier
theorem closure_eq_self_union_frontier (s : Set X) : closure s = s ∪ frontier s :=
(union_diff_cancel' interior_subset subset_closure).symm
#align closure_eq_self_union_frontier closure_eq_self_union_frontier
theorem Disjoint.frontier_left (ht : IsOpen t) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint (frontier s) t :=
subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right.1 <|
frontier_subset_closure.trans <| closure_minimal (disjoint_left.1 hd) <| isClosed_compl_iff.2 ht
#align disjoint.frontier_left Disjoint.frontier_left
theorem Disjoint.frontier_right (hs : IsOpen s) (hd : Disjoint s t) : Disjoint s (frontier t) :=
(hd.symm.frontier_left hs).symm
#align disjoint.frontier_right Disjoint.frontier_right
theorem frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior :
frontier s = (interior s)ᶜ ∩ (interior sᶜ)ᶜ := by
rw [← frontier_compl, ← closure_compl, ← diff_eq, closure_diff_interior]
#align frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior
theorem compl_frontier_eq_union_interior :
(frontier s)ᶜ = interior s ∪ interior sᶜ := by
rw [frontier_eq_inter_compl_interior]
simp only [compl_inter, compl_compl]
#align compl_frontier_eq_union_interior compl_frontier_eq_union_interior
/-!
### Neighborhoods
-/
theorem nhds_def' (x : X) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsOpen s) (_ : x ∈ s), 𝓟 s := by
simp only [nhds_def, mem_setOf_eq, @and_comm (x ∈ _), iInf_and]
#align nhds_def' nhds_def'
/-- The open sets containing `x` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens'`
for a variant using open neighborhoods instead. -/
theorem nhds_basis_opens (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s) fun s => s := by
rw [nhds_def]
exact hasBasis_biInf_principal
(fun s ⟨has, hs⟩ t ⟨hat, ht⟩ =>
⟨s ∩ t, ⟨⟨has, hat⟩, IsOpen.inter hs ht⟩, ⟨inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right⟩⟩)
⟨univ, ⟨mem_univ x, isOpen_univ⟩⟩
#align nhds_basis_opens nhds_basis_opens
theorem nhds_basis_closeds (x : X) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => x ∉ s ∧ IsClosed s) compl :=
⟨fun t => (nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <|
compl_surjective.exists.trans <| by simp only [isOpen_compl_iff, mem_compl_iff]⟩
#align nhds_basis_closeds nhds_basis_closeds
@[simp]
theorem lift'_nhds_interior (x : X) : (𝓝 x).lift' interior = 𝓝 x :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).lift'_interior_eq_self fun _ ↦ And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.nhds_interior {x : X} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X}
(h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p (interior <| s ·) :=
lift'_nhds_interior x ▸ h.lift'_interior
/-- A filter lies below the neighborhood filter at `x` iff it contains every open set around `x`. -/
theorem le_nhds_iff {f} : f ≤ 𝓝 x ↔ ∀ s : Set X, x ∈ s → IsOpen s → s ∈ f := by simp [nhds_def]
#align le_nhds_iff le_nhds_iff
/-- To show a filter is above the neighborhood filter at `x`, it suffices to show that it is above
the principal filter of some open set `s` containing `x`. -/
theorem nhds_le_of_le {f} (h : x ∈ s) (o : IsOpen s) (sf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : 𝓝 x ≤ f := by
rw [nhds_def]; exact iInf₂_le_of_le s ⟨h, o⟩ sf
#align nhds_le_of_le nhds_le_of_le
theorem mem_nhds_iff : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
(nhds_basis_opens x).mem_iff.trans <| exists_congr fun _ =>
⟨fun h => ⟨h.2, h.1.2, h.1.1⟩, fun h => ⟨⟨h.2.2, h.2.1⟩, h.1⟩⟩
#align mem_nhds_iff mem_nhds_iffₓ
/-- A predicate is true in a neighborhood of `x` iff it is true for all the points in an open set
containing `x`. -/
theorem eventually_nhds_iff {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x) ↔ ∃ t : Set X, (∀ x ∈ t, p x) ∧ IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t :=
mem_nhds_iff.trans <| by simp only [subset_def, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
#align eventually_nhds_iff eventually_nhds_iff
theorem mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds : x ∈ interior s ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_interior.trans mem_nhds_iff.symm
#align mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds
theorem map_nhds {f : X → α} :
map f (𝓝 x) = ⨅ s ∈ { s : Set X | x ∈ s ∧ IsOpen s }, 𝓟 (f '' s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).map f).eq_biInf
#align map_nhds map_nhds
theorem mem_of_mem_nhds : s ∈ 𝓝 x → x ∈ s := fun H =>
let ⟨_t, ht, _, hs⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 H; ht hs
#align mem_of_mem_nhds mem_of_mem_nhds
/-- If a predicate is true in a neighborhood of `x`, then it is true for `x`. -/
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhds h
#align filter.eventually.self_of_nhds Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhds
theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.refl _, hs, hx⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds IsOpen.mem_nhds
protected theorem IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff (hs : IsOpen s) : s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ x ∈ s :=
⟨mem_of_mem_nhds, fun hx => mem_nhds_iff.2 ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hs, hx⟩⟩
#align is_open.mem_nhds_iff IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
theorem IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds (hs : IsClosed s) (hx : x ∉ s) : sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x :=
hs.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds (mem_compl hx)
#align is_closed.compl_mem_nhds IsClosed.compl_mem_nhds
theorem IsOpen.eventually_mem (hs : IsOpen s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx
#align is_open.eventually_mem IsOpen.eventually_mem
/-- The open neighborhoods of `x` are a basis for the neighborhood filter. See `nhds_basis_opens`
for a variant using open sets around `x` instead. -/
theorem nhds_basis_opens' (x : X) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s : Set X => s ∈ 𝓝 x ∧ IsOpen s) fun x => x := by
convert nhds_basis_opens x using 2
exact and_congr_left_iff.2 IsOpen.mem_nhds_iff
#align nhds_basis_opens' nhds_basis_opens'
/-- If `U` is a neighborhood of each point of a set `s` then it is a neighborhood of `s`:
it contains an open set containing `s`. -/
theorem exists_open_set_nhds {U : Set X} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, U ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : Set X, s ⊆ V ∧ IsOpen V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
⟨interior U, fun x hx => mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| h x hx, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
#align exists_open_set_nhds exists_open_set_nhds
/-- If `U` is a neighborhood of each point of a set `s` then it is a neighborhood of s:
it contains an open set containing `s`. -/
theorem exists_open_set_nhds' {U : Set X} (h : U ∈ ⨆ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x) :
∃ V : Set X, s ⊆ V ∧ IsOpen V ∧ V ⊆ U :=
exists_open_set_nhds (by simpa using h)
#align exists_open_set_nhds' exists_open_set_nhds'
/-- If a predicate is true in a neighbourhood of `x`, then for `y` sufficiently close
to `x` this predicate is true in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
theorem Filter.Eventually.eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x :=
let ⟨t, htp, hto, ha⟩ := eventually_nhds_iff.1 h
eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, fun _x hx => eventually_nhds_iff.2 ⟨t, htp, hto, hx⟩, hto, ha⟩
#align filter.eventually.eventually_nhds Filter.Eventually.eventually_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x :=
⟨fun h => h.self_of_nhds, fun h => h.eventually_nhds⟩
#align eventually_eventually_nhds eventually_eventually_nhds
@[simp]
theorem frequently_frequently_nhds {p : X → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, ∃ᶠ x'' in 𝓝 x', p x'') ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, p x := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp only [not_frequently, eventually_eventually_nhds]
#align frequently_frequently_nhds frequently_frequently_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhds : (∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝 x, s ∈ 𝓝 x') ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_mem_nhds eventually_mem_nhds
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhds : (𝓝 x).bind 𝓝 = 𝓝 x :=
Filter.ext fun _ => eventually_eventually_nhds
#align nhds_bind_nhds nhds_bind_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventuallyEq_nhds {f g : X → α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_eventually_eq_nhds eventually_eventuallyEq_nhds
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhds {f g : X → α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) : f x = g x :=
h.self_of_nhds
#align filter.eventually_eq.eq_of_nhds Filter.EventuallyEq.eq_of_nhds
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventuallyLE_nhds [LE α] {f g : X → α} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g) ↔ f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 x] g :=
eventually_eventually_nhds
#align eventually_eventually_le_nhds eventually_eventuallyLE_nhds
/-- If two functions are equal in a neighbourhood of `x`, then for `y` sufficiently close
to `x` these functions are equal in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.eventuallyEq_nhds {f g : X → α} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f =ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
#align filter.eventually_eq.eventually_eq_nhds Filter.EventuallyEq.eventuallyEq_nhds
/-- If `f x ≤ g x` in a neighbourhood of `x`, then for `y` sufficiently close to `x` we have
`f x ≤ g x` in a neighbourhood of `y`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyLE.eventuallyLE_nhds [LE α] {f g : X → α} (h : f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f ≤ᶠ[𝓝 y] g :=
h.eventually_nhds
#align filter.eventually_le.eventually_le_nhds Filter.EventuallyLE.eventuallyLE_nhds
theorem all_mem_nhds (x : X) (P : Set X → Prop) (hP : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → P s → P t) :
(∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, P s) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → P s :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).forall_iff hP).trans <| by simp only [@and_comm (x ∈ _), and_imp]
#align all_mem_nhds all_mem_nhds
theorem all_mem_nhds_filter (x : X) (f : Set X → Set α) (hf : ∀ s t, s ⊆ t → f s ⊆ f t)
(l : Filter α) : (∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, f s ∈ l) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → f s ∈ l :=
all_mem_nhds _ _ fun s t ssubt h => mem_of_superset h (hf s t ssubt)
#align all_mem_nhds_filter all_mem_nhds_filter
theorem tendsto_nhds {f : α → X} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → x ∈ s → f ⁻¹' s ∈ l :=
all_mem_nhds_filter _ _ (fun _ _ h => preimage_mono h) _
#align tendsto_nhds tendsto_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop_nhds [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {f : α → X} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 x) ↔ ∀ U : Set X, x ∈ U → IsOpen U → ∃ N, ∀ n, N ≤ n → f n ∈ U :=
(atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (nhds_basis_opens x)).trans <| by
simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, true_and_iff, mem_Ici, ge_iff_le]
#align tendsto_at_top_nhds tendsto_atTop_nhds
theorem tendsto_const_nhds {f : Filter α} : Tendsto (fun _ : α => x) f (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_nhds.mpr fun _ _ ha => univ_mem' fun _ => ha
#align tendsto_const_nhds tendsto_const_nhds
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] [Nonempty ι]
{u : ι → X} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≥ i₀, u i = x) : Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 x) :=
Tendsto.congr' (EventuallyEq.symm (eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
#align tendsto_at_top_of_eventually_const tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const
theorem tendsto_atBot_of_eventually_const {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeInf ι] [Nonempty ι]
{u : ι → X} {i₀ : ι} (h : ∀ i ≤ i₀, u i = x) : Tendsto u atBot (𝓝 x) :=
Tendsto.congr' (EventuallyEq.symm (eventually_atBot.mpr ⟨i₀, h⟩)) tendsto_const_nhds
#align tendsto_at_bot_of_eventually_const tendsto_atBot_of_eventually_const
theorem pure_le_nhds : pure ≤ (𝓝 : X → Filter X) := fun _ _ hs => mem_pure.2 <| mem_of_mem_nhds hs
#align pure_le_nhds pure_le_nhds
theorem tendsto_pure_nhds (f : α → X) (a : α) : Tendsto f (pure a) (𝓝 (f a)) :=
(tendsto_pure_pure f a).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
#align tendsto_pure_nhds tendsto_pure_nhds
theorem OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds [PartialOrder α] [OrderTop α] (f : α → X) :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 (f ⊤)) :=
(tendsto_atTop_pure f).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
#align order_top.tendsto_at_top_nhds OrderTop.tendsto_atTop_nhds
@[simp]
instance nhds_neBot : NeBot (𝓝 x) :=
neBot_of_le (pure_le_nhds x)
#align nhds_ne_bot nhds_neBot
theorem tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq {l : Filter α} {f : α → X} (h : ∀ᶠ x' in l, f x' = x) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_const_nhds.congr' (.symm h)
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.tendsto {l : Filter α} {f : α → X} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] fun _ ↦ x) :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) :=
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq hf
/-!
### Cluster points
In this section we define [cluster points](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_point)
(also known as limit points and accumulation points) of a filter and of a sequence.
-/
theorem ClusterPt.neBot {F : Filter X} (h : ClusterPt x F) : NeBot (𝓝 x ⊓ F) :=
h
#align cluster_pt.ne_bot ClusterPt.neBot
theorem Filter.HasBasis.clusterPt_iff {ιX ιF} {pX : ιX → Prop} {sX : ιX → Set X} {pF : ιF → Prop}
{sF : ιF → Set X} {F : Filter X} (hX : (𝓝 x).HasBasis pX sX) (hF : F.HasBasis pF sF) :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ ⦃i⦄, pX i → ∀ ⦃j⦄, pF j → (sX i ∩ sF j).Nonempty :=
hX.inf_basis_neBot_iff hF
#align filter.has_basis.cluster_pt_iff Filter.HasBasis.clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ ⦃U : Set X⦄, U ∈ 𝓝 x → ∀ ⦃V⦄, V ∈ F → (U ∩ V).Nonempty :=
inf_neBot_iff
#align cluster_pt_iff clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff_not_disjoint {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ¬Disjoint (𝓝 x) F := by
rw [disjoint_iff, ClusterPt, neBot_iff]
/-- `x` is a cluster point of a set `s` if every neighbourhood of `x` meets `s` on a nonempty
set. See also `mem_closure_iff_clusterPt`. -/
theorem clusterPt_principal_iff :
ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).Nonempty :=
inf_principal_neBot_iff
#align cluster_pt_principal_iff clusterPt_principal_iff
theorem clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently :
ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s := by
simp only [clusterPt_principal_iff, frequently_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, mem_inter_iff]
#align cluster_pt_principal_iff_frequently clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently
theorem ClusterPt.of_le_nhds {f : Filter X} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) [NeBot f] : ClusterPt x f := by
rwa [ClusterPt, inf_eq_right.mpr H]
#align cluster_pt.of_le_nhds ClusterPt.of_le_nhds
theorem ClusterPt.of_le_nhds' {f : Filter X} (H : f ≤ 𝓝 x) (_hf : NeBot f) :
ClusterPt x f :=
ClusterPt.of_le_nhds H
#align cluster_pt.of_le_nhds' ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
theorem ClusterPt.of_nhds_le {f : Filter X} (H : 𝓝 x ≤ f) : ClusterPt x f := by
simp only [ClusterPt, inf_eq_left.mpr H, nhds_neBot]
#align cluster_pt.of_nhds_le ClusterPt.of_nhds_le
theorem ClusterPt.mono {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x f) (h : f ≤ g) : ClusterPt x g :=
NeBot.mono H <| inf_le_inf_left _ h
#align cluster_pt.mono ClusterPt.mono
theorem ClusterPt.of_inf_left {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ g) : ClusterPt x f :=
H.mono inf_le_left
#align cluster_pt.of_inf_left ClusterPt.of_inf_left
theorem ClusterPt.of_inf_right {f g : Filter X} (H : ClusterPt x <| f ⊓ g) :
ClusterPt x g :=
H.mono inf_le_right
#align cluster_pt.of_inf_right ClusterPt.of_inf_right
theorem Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff {f : Ultrafilter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔ ↑f ≤ 𝓝 x :=
⟨f.le_of_inf_neBot', fun h => ClusterPt.of_le_nhds h⟩
#align ultrafilter.cluster_pt_iff Ultrafilter.clusterPt_iff
theorem clusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {f : Filter X} : ClusterPt x f ↔
∃ u : Ultrafilter X, u ≤ f ∧ u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [ClusterPt, ← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]
theorem mapClusterPt_def {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ClusterPt x (map u F) := Iff.rfl
theorem mapClusterPt_iff {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∀ s ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ᶠ a in F, u a ∈ s := by
simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left, frequently_map]
rfl
#align map_cluster_pt_iff mapClusterPt_iff
theorem mapClusterPt_iff_ultrafilter {ι : Type*} (x : X) (F : Filter ι) (u : ι → X) :
MapClusterPt x F u ↔ ∃ U : Ultrafilter ι, U ≤ F ∧ Tendsto u U (𝓝 x) := by
simp_rw [MapClusterPt, ClusterPt, ← Filter.push_pull', map_neBot_iff, tendsto_iff_comap,
← le_inf_iff, exists_ultrafilter_iff, inf_comm]
theorem mapClusterPt_comp {X α β : Type*} {x : X} [TopologicalSpace X] {F : Filter α} {φ : α → β}
{u : β → X} : MapClusterPt x F (u ∘ φ) ↔ MapClusterPt x (map φ F) u := Iff.rfl
theorem mapClusterPt_of_comp {F : Filter α} {φ : β → α} {p : Filter β}
{u : α → X} [NeBot p] (h : Tendsto φ p F) (H : Tendsto (u ∘ φ) p (𝓝 x)) :
MapClusterPt x F u := by
have :=
calc
map (u ∘ φ) p = map u (map φ p) := map_map
_ ≤ map u F := map_mono h
have : map (u ∘ φ) p ≤ 𝓝 x ⊓ map u F := le_inf H this
exact neBot_of_le this
#align map_cluster_pt_of_comp mapClusterPt_of_comp
theorem acc_iff_cluster (x : X) (F : Filter X) : AccPt x F ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 {x}ᶜ ⊓ F) := by
rw [AccPt, nhdsWithin, ClusterPt, inf_assoc]
#align acc_iff_cluster acc_iff_cluster
/-- `x` is an accumulation point of a set `C` iff it is a cluster point of `C ∖ {x}`. -/
theorem acc_principal_iff_cluster (x : X) (C : Set X) :
AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 (C \ {x})) := by
rw [acc_iff_cluster, inf_principal, inter_comm, diff_eq]
#align acc_principal_iff_cluster acc_principal_iff_cluster
/-- `x` is an accumulation point of a set `C` iff every neighborhood
of `x` contains a point of `C` other than `x`. -/
theorem accPt_iff_nhds (x : X) (C : Set X) : AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ y ∈ U ∩ C, y ≠ x := by
simp [acc_principal_iff_cluster, clusterPt_principal_iff, Set.Nonempty, exists_prop, and_assoc,
@and_comm (¬_ = x)]
#align acc_pt_iff_nhds accPt_iff_nhds
/-- `x` is an accumulation point of a set `C` iff
there are points near `x` in `C` and different from `x`. -/
theorem accPt_iff_frequently (x : X) (C : Set X) : AccPt x (𝓟 C) ↔ ∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ≠ x ∧ y ∈ C := by
simp [acc_principal_iff_cluster, clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently, and_comm]
#align acc_pt_iff_frequently accPt_iff_frequently
/-- If `x` is an accumulation point of `F` and `F ≤ G`, then
`x` is an accumulation point of `D`. -/
theorem AccPt.mono {F G : Filter X} (h : AccPt x F) (hFG : F ≤ G) : AccPt x G :=
NeBot.mono h (inf_le_inf_left _ hFG)
#align acc_pt.mono AccPt.mono
/-!
### Interior, closure and frontier in terms of neighborhoods
-/
theorem interior_eq_nhds' : interior s = { x | s ∈ 𝓝 x } :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_interior, mem_nhds_iff, mem_setOf_eq]
#align interior_eq_nhds' interior_eq_nhds'
theorem interior_eq_nhds : interior s = { x | 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s } :=
interior_eq_nhds'.trans <| by simp only [le_principal_iff]
#align interior_eq_nhds interior_eq_nhds
@[simp]
theorem interior_mem_nhds : interior s ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
⟨fun h => mem_of_superset h interior_subset, fun h =>
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_interior (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 h)⟩
#align interior_mem_nhds interior_mem_nhds
theorem interior_setOf_eq {p : X → Prop} : interior { x | p x } = { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y } :=
interior_eq_nhds'
#align interior_set_of_eq interior_setOf_eq
theorem isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds {p : X → Prop} : IsOpen { x | ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, p y } := by
simp only [← interior_setOf_eq, isOpen_interior]
#align is_open_set_of_eventually_nhds isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds
theorem subset_interior_iff_nhds {V : Set X} : s ⊆ interior V ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, V ∈ 𝓝 x := by
simp_rw [subset_def, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds]
#align subset_interior_iff_nhds subset_interior_iff_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_nhds : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s :=
calc
IsOpen s ↔ s ⊆ interior s := subset_interior_iff_isOpen.symm
_ ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, 𝓝 x ≤ 𝓟 s := by simp_rw [interior_eq_nhds, subset_def, mem_setOf]
#align is_open_iff_nhds isOpen_iff_nhds
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_nhds {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ x, @nhds _ t x = @nhds _ t' x :=
⟨fun H x ↦ congrFun (congrArg _ H) _, fun H ↦ by ext; simp_rw [@isOpen_iff_nhds _ _ _, H]⟩
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_nhds
theorem isOpen_iff_mem_nhds : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, s ∈ 𝓝 x :=
isOpen_iff_nhds.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_congr_right fun _ => le_principal_iff
#align is_open_iff_mem_nhds isOpen_iff_mem_nhds
/-- A set `s` is open iff for every point `x` in `s` and every `y` close to `x`, `y` is in `s`. -/
theorem isOpen_iff_eventually : IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s :=
isOpen_iff_mem_nhds
#align is_open_iff_eventually isOpen_iff_eventually
theorem isOpen_iff_ultrafilter :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ (l : Ultrafilter X), ↑l ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ l := by
simp_rw [isOpen_iff_mem_nhds, ← mem_iff_ultrafilter]
#align is_open_iff_ultrafilter isOpen_iff_ultrafilter
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure (x : X) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) ↔ 𝓝 x = pure x := by
constructor
· intro h
apply le_antisymm _ (pure_le_nhds x)
rw [le_pure_iff]
exact h.mem_nhds (mem_singleton x)
· intro h
simp [isOpen_iff_nhds, h]
#align is_open_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure
theorem isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds (x : X) : IsOpen ({x} : Set X) ↔ 𝓝[≠] x = ⊥ := by
rw [isOpen_singleton_iff_nhds_eq_pure, nhdsWithin, ← mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, ← le_pure_iff,
nhds_neBot.le_pure_iff]
#align is_open_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds isOpen_singleton_iff_punctured_nhds
theorem mem_closure_iff_frequently : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s := by
rw [Filter.Frequently, Filter.Eventually, ← mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds,
closure_eq_compl_interior_compl, mem_compl_iff, compl_def]
#align mem_closure_iff_frequently mem_closure_iff_frequently
alias ⟨_, Filter.Frequently.mem_closure⟩ := mem_closure_iff_frequently
#align filter.frequently.mem_closure Filter.Frequently.mem_closure
/-- A set `s` is closed iff for every point `x`, if there is a point `y` close to `x` that belongs
to `s` then `x` is in `s`. -/
theorem isClosed_iff_frequently : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, (∃ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s) → x ∈ s := by
rw [← closure_subset_iff_isClosed]
refine forall_congr' fun x => ?_
rw [mem_closure_iff_frequently]
#align is_closed_iff_frequently isClosed_iff_frequently
/-- The set of cluster points of a filter is closed. In particular, the set of limit points
of a sequence is closed. -/
theorem isClosed_setOf_clusterPt {f : Filter X} : IsClosed { x | ClusterPt x f } := by
simp only [ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff_frequently_left, setOf_forall, imp_iff_not_or]
refine isClosed_iInter fun p => IsClosed.union ?_ ?_ <;> apply isClosed_compl_iff.2
exacts [isOpen_setOf_eventually_nhds, isOpen_const]
#align is_closed_set_of_cluster_pt isClosed_setOf_clusterPt
theorem mem_closure_iff_clusterPt : x ∈ closure s ↔ ClusterPt x (𝓟 s) :=
mem_closure_iff_frequently.trans clusterPt_principal_iff_frequently.symm
#align mem_closure_iff_cluster_pt mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot : x ∈ closure s ↔ 𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 s ≠ ⊥ :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans neBot_iff
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-28")]
alias mem_closure_iff_nhds_neBot := mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot : x ∈ closure s ↔ NeBot (𝓝[s] x) :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_within_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot
lemma not_mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_eq_bot : x ∉ closure s ↔ 𝓝[s] x = ⊥ := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot, not_neBot]
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then `{x}ᶜ` is dense in the whole
space. -/
theorem dense_compl_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : Dense ({x}ᶜ : Set X) := by
intro y
rcases eq_or_ne y x with (rfl | hne)
· rwa [mem_closure_iff_nhdsWithin_neBot]
· exact subset_closure hne
#align dense_compl_singleton dense_compl_singleton
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then the closure of `{x}ᶜ` is the whole
space. -/
-- Porting note (#10618): was a `@[simp]` lemma but `simp` can prove it
theorem closure_compl_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : closure {x}ᶜ = (univ : Set X) :=
(dense_compl_singleton x).closure_eq
#align closure_compl_singleton closure_compl_singleton
/-- If `x` is not an isolated point of a topological space, then the interior of `{x}` is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem interior_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : interior {x} = (∅ : Set X) :=
interior_eq_empty_iff_dense_compl.2 (dense_compl_singleton x)
#align interior_singleton interior_singleton
theorem not_isOpen_singleton (x : X) [NeBot (𝓝[≠] x)] : ¬IsOpen ({x} : Set X) :=
dense_compl_singleton_iff_not_open.1 (dense_compl_singleton x)
#align not_is_open_singleton not_isOpen_singleton
theorem closure_eq_cluster_pts : closure s = { a | ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_closure_iff_clusterPt
#align closure_eq_cluster_pts closure_eq_cluster_pts
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 x, (t ∩ s).Nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans clusterPt_principal_iff
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds mem_closure_iff_nhds
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds' : x ∈ closure s ↔ ∀ t ∈ 𝓝 x, ∃ y : s, ↑y ∈ t := by
simp only [mem_closure_iff_nhds, Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right, SetCoe.exists, exists_prop]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds' mem_closure_iff_nhds'
theorem mem_closure_iff_comap_neBot :
x ∈ closure s ↔ NeBot (comap ((↑) : s → X) (𝓝 x)) := by
simp_rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds, comap_neBot_iff, Set.inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right,
SetCoe.exists, exists_prop]
#align mem_closure_iff_comap_ne_bot mem_closure_iff_comap_neBot
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} (h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) :
x ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → (s i ∩ t).Nonempty :=
mem_closure_iff_clusterPt.trans <|
(h.clusterPt_iff (hasBasis_principal _)).trans <| by simp only [exists_prop, forall_const]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis'
theorem mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set X} (h : (𝓝 x).HasBasis p s) :
x ∈ closure t ↔ ∀ i, p i → ∃ y ∈ t, y ∈ s i :=
(mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis' h).trans <| by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, mem_inter_iff, exists_prop, and_comm]
#align mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis
theorem clusterPt_iff_forall_mem_closure {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ ∀ s ∈ F, x ∈ closure s := by
simp_rw [ClusterPt, inf_neBot_iff, mem_closure_iff_nhds]
rw [forall₂_swap]
theorem clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ pure x ≤ (F.lift' closure) := by
simp_rw [clusterPt_iff_forall_mem_closure,
(hasBasis_pure _).le_basis_iff F.basis_sets.lift'_closure, id, singleton_subset_iff, true_and,
exists_const]
theorem clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure' {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x F ↔ (F.lift' closure ⊓ pure x).NeBot := by
rw [clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure, ← Ultrafilter.coe_pure, inf_comm, Ultrafilter.inf_neBot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem clusterPt_lift'_closure_iff {F : Filter X} :
ClusterPt x (F.lift' closure) ↔ ClusterPt x F := by
simp [clusterPt_iff_lift'_closure, lift'_lift'_assoc (monotone_closure X) (monotone_closure X)]
/-- `x` belongs to the closure of `s` if and only if some ultrafilter
supported on `s` converges to `x`. -/
theorem mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter :
x ∈ closure s ↔ ∃ u : Ultrafilter X, s ∈ u ∧ ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x := by
simp [closure_eq_cluster_pts, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff, and_comm]
#align mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter mem_closure_iff_ultrafilter
theorem isClosed_iff_clusterPt : IsClosed s ↔ ∀ a, ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s :=
calc
IsClosed s ↔ closure s ⊆ s := closure_subset_iff_isClosed.symm
_ ↔ ∀ a, ClusterPt a (𝓟 s) → a ∈ s := by simp only [subset_def, mem_closure_iff_clusterPt]
#align is_closed_iff_cluster_pt isClosed_iff_clusterPt
theorem isClosed_iff_ultrafilter : IsClosed s ↔
∀ x, ∀ u : Ultrafilter X, ↑u ≤ 𝓝 x → s ∈ u → x ∈ s := by
simp [isClosed_iff_clusterPt, ClusterPt, ← exists_ultrafilter_iff]
theorem isClosed_iff_nhds :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, (∀ U ∈ 𝓝 x, (U ∩ s).Nonempty) → x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [isClosed_iff_clusterPt, ClusterPt, inf_principal_neBot_iff]
#align is_closed_iff_nhds isClosed_iff_nhds
lemma isClosed_iff_forall_filter :
IsClosed s ↔ ∀ x, ∀ F : Filter X, F.NeBot → F ≤ 𝓟 s → F ≤ 𝓝 x → x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [isClosed_iff_clusterPt]
exact ⟨fun hs x F F_ne FS Fx ↦ hs _ <| NeBot.mono F_ne (le_inf Fx FS),
fun hs x hx ↦ hs x (𝓝 x ⊓ 𝓟 s) hx inf_le_right inf_le_left⟩
theorem IsClosed.interior_union_left (_ : IsClosed s) :
interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ s ∪ interior t := fun a ⟨u, ⟨⟨hu₁, hu₂⟩, ha⟩⟩ =>
(Classical.em (a ∈ s)).imp_right fun h =>
mem_interior.mpr
⟨u ∩ sᶜ, fun _x hx => (hu₂ hx.1).resolve_left hx.2, IsOpen.inter hu₁ IsClosed.isOpen_compl,
⟨ha, h⟩⟩
#align is_closed.interior_union_left IsClosed.interior_union_left
theorem IsClosed.interior_union_right (h : IsClosed t) :
interior (s ∪ t) ⊆ interior s ∪ t := by
simpa only [union_comm _ t] using h.interior_union_left
#align is_closed.interior_union_right IsClosed.interior_union_right
theorem IsOpen.inter_closure (h : IsOpen s) : s ∩ closure t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) :=
compl_subset_compl.mp <| by
simpa only [← interior_compl, compl_inter] using IsClosed.interior_union_left h.isClosed_compl
#align is_open.inter_closure IsOpen.inter_closure
theorem IsOpen.closure_inter (h : IsOpen t) : closure s ∩ t ⊆ closure (s ∩ t) := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using h.inter_closure
#align is_open.closure_inter IsOpen.closure_inter
theorem Dense.open_subset_closure_inter (hs : Dense s) (ht : IsOpen t) :
t ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) :=
calc
t = t ∩ closure s := by rw [hs.closure_eq, inter_univ]
_ ⊆ closure (t ∩ s) := ht.inter_closure
#align dense.open_subset_closure_inter Dense.open_subset_closure_inter
theorem mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union (h : x ∈ closure (s₁ ∪ s₂))
(h₁ : s₁ᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x) : x ∈ closure s₂ := by
rw [mem_closure_iff_nhds_ne_bot] at *
rwa [← sup_principal, inf_sup_left, inf_principal_eq_bot.mpr h₁, bot_sup_eq] at h
#align mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union mem_closure_of_mem_closure_union
/-- The intersection of an open dense set with a dense set is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.inter_of_isOpen_left (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) (hso : IsOpen s) :
Dense (s ∩ t) := fun x =>
closure_minimal hso.inter_closure isClosed_closure <| by simp [hs.closure_eq, ht.closure_eq]
#align dense.inter_of_open_left Dense.inter_of_isOpen_left
/-- The intersection of a dense set with an open dense set is a dense set. -/
theorem Dense.inter_of_isOpen_right (hs : Dense s) (ht : Dense t) (hto : IsOpen t) :
Dense (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_of_isOpen_left hs hto
#align dense.inter_of_open_right Dense.inter_of_isOpen_right
theorem Dense.inter_nhds_nonempty (hs : Dense s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨U, hsub, ho, hx⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.1 ht
(hs.inter_open_nonempty U ho ⟨x, hx⟩).mono fun _y hy => ⟨hy.2, hsub hy.1⟩
#align dense.inter_nhds_nonempty Dense.inter_nhds_nonempty
theorem closure_diff : closure s \ closure t ⊆ closure (s \ t) :=
calc
closure s \ closure t = (closure t)ᶜ ∩ closure s := by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
_ ⊆ closure ((closure t)ᶜ ∩ s) := (isOpen_compl_iff.mpr <| isClosed_closure).inter_closure
_ = closure (s \ closure t) := by simp only [diff_eq, inter_comm]
_ ⊆ closure (s \ t) := closure_mono <| diff_subset_diff (Subset.refl s) subset_closure
#align closure_diff closure_diff
theorem Filter.Frequently.mem_of_closed (h : ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 x, x ∈ s)
(hs : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s :=
hs.closure_subset h.mem_closure
#align filter.frequently.mem_of_closed Filter.Frequently.mem_of_closed
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α}
(hs : IsClosed s) (h : ∃ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) : x ∈ s :=
(hf.frequently <| show ∃ᶠ x in b, (fun y => y ∈ s) (f x) from h).mem_of_closed hs
#align is_closed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto IsClosed.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto
theorem IsClosed.mem_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α} [NeBot b]
(hs : IsClosed s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hs.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h.frequently hf
#align is_closed.mem_of_tendsto IsClosed.mem_of_tendsto
theorem mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α}
(h : ∃ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) (hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) : x ∈ closure s :=
(hf.frequently h).mem_closure
#align mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto
theorem mem_closure_of_tendsto {f : α → X} {b : Filter α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 x)) (h : ∀ᶠ x in b, f x ∈ s) : x ∈ closure s :=
mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto h.frequently hf
#align mem_closure_of_tendsto mem_closure_of_tendsto
/-- Suppose that `f` sends the complement to `s` to a single point `x`, and `l` is some filter.
Then `f` tends to `x` along `l` restricted to `s` if and only if it tends to `x` along `l`. -/
theorem tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq {f : α → X} {l : Filter α} {s : Set α}
(h : ∀ a ∉ s, f a = x) : Tendsto f (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 x) ↔ Tendsto f l (𝓝 x) := by
rw [tendsto_iff_comap, tendsto_iff_comap]
replace h : 𝓟 sᶜ ≤ comap f (𝓝 x) := by
rintro U ⟨t, ht, htU⟩ x hx
have : f x ∈ t := (h x hx).symm ▸ mem_of_mem_nhds ht
exact htU this
refine ⟨fun h' => ?_, le_trans inf_le_left⟩
have := sup_le h' h
rw [sup_inf_right, sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ, inf_top_eq, sup_le_iff]
at this
exact this.1
#align tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq tendsto_inf_principal_nhds_iff_of_forall_eq
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
-- "Lim"
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
#align le_nhds_Lim le_nhds_lim
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
#align tendsto_nhds_lim tendsto_nhds_limUnder
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
open Topology
/-!
### Continuity
-/
section Continuous
variable {X Y Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Z]
open TopologicalSpace
-- The curly braces are intentional, so this definition works well with simp
-- when topologies are not those provided by instances.
theorem continuous_def {_ : TopologicalSpace X} {_ : TopologicalSpace Y} {f : X → Y} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen s → IsOpen (f ⁻¹' s) :=
⟨fun hf => hf.1, fun h => ⟨h⟩⟩
#align continuous_def continuous_def
variable {f : X → Y} {s : Set X} {x : X} {y : Y}
theorem IsOpen.preimage (hf : Continuous f) {t : Set Y} (h : IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (f ⁻¹' t) :=
hf.isOpen_preimage t h
#align is_open.preimage IsOpen.preimage
theorem continuous_congr {g : X → Y} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) :
Continuous f ↔ Continuous g :=
.of_eq <| congrArg _ <| funext h
theorem Continuous.congr {g : X → Y} (h : Continuous f) (h' : ∀ x, f x = g x) : Continuous g :=
continuous_congr h' |>.mp h
#align continuous.congr Continuous.congr
theorem ContinuousAt.tendsto (h : ContinuousAt f x) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
h
#align continuous_at.tendsto ContinuousAt.tendsto
theorem continuousAt_def : ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ A ∈ 𝓝 (f x), f ⁻¹' A ∈ 𝓝 x :=
Iff.rfl
#align continuous_at_def continuousAt_def
theorem continuousAt_congr {g : X → Y} (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ContinuousAt g x := by
simp only [ContinuousAt, tendsto_congr' h, h.eq_of_nhds]
#align continuous_at_congr continuousAt_congr
theorem ContinuousAt.congr {g : X → Y} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] g) :
ContinuousAt g x :=
(continuousAt_congr h).1 hf
#align continuous_at.congr ContinuousAt.congr
theorem ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds {t : Set Y} (h : ContinuousAt f x)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : f ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 x :=
h ht
#align continuous_at.preimage_mem_nhds ContinuousAt.preimage_mem_nhds
/-- If `f x ∈ s ∈ 𝓝 (f x)` for continuous `f`, then `f y ∈ s` near `x`.
This is essentially `Filter.Tendsto.eventually_mem`, but infers in more cases when applied. -/
theorem ContinuousAt.eventually_mem {f : X → Y} {x : X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) {s : Set Y}
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 (f x)) : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, f y ∈ s :=
hf hs
/-- Deprecated, please use `not_mem_tsupport_iff_eventuallyEq` instead. -/
@[deprecated (since := "2024-01-15")]
theorem eventuallyEq_zero_nhds {M₀} [Zero M₀] {f : X → M₀} :
f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] 0 ↔ x ∉ closure (Function.support f) := by
rw [← mem_compl_iff, ← interior_compl, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds, Function.compl_support,
EventuallyEq, eventually_iff]
simp only [Pi.zero_apply]
#align eventually_eq_zero_nhds eventuallyEq_zero_nhds
theorem ClusterPt.map {lx : Filter X} {ly : Filter Y} (H : ClusterPt x lx)
(hfc : ContinuousAt f x) (hf : Tendsto f lx ly) : ClusterPt (f x) ly :=
(NeBot.map H f).mono <| hfc.tendsto.inf hf
#align cluster_pt.map ClusterPt.map
/-- See also `interior_preimage_subset_preimage_interior`. -/
theorem preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage {t : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f) :
f ⁻¹' interior t ⊆ interior (f ⁻¹' t) :=
interior_maximal (preimage_mono interior_subset) (isOpen_interior.preimage hf)
#align preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_id : Continuous (id : X → X) :=
continuous_def.2 fun _ => id
#align continuous_id continuous_id
-- This is needed due to reducibility issues with the `continuity` tactic.
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_id' : Continuous (fun (x : X) => x) := continuous_id
theorem Continuous.comp {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (g ∘ f) :=
continuous_def.2 fun _ h => (h.preimage hg).preimage hf
#align continuous.comp Continuous.comp
-- This is needed due to reducibility issues with the `continuity` tactic.
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.comp' {g : Y → Z} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : Continuous f) :
Continuous (fun x => g (f x)) := hg.comp hf
theorem Continuous.iterate {f : X → X} (h : Continuous f) (n : ℕ) : Continuous f^[n] :=
Nat.recOn n continuous_id fun _ ihn => ihn.comp h
#align continuous.iterate Continuous.iterate
nonrec theorem ContinuousAt.comp {g : Y → Z} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (g ∘ f) x :=
hg.comp hf
#align continuous_at.comp ContinuousAt.comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem ContinuousAt.comp' {g : Y → Z} {x : X} (hg : ContinuousAt g (f x))
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) : ContinuousAt (fun x => g (f x)) x := ContinuousAt.comp hg hf
/-- See note [comp_of_eq lemmas] -/
theorem ContinuousAt.comp_of_eq {g : Y → Z} (hg : ContinuousAt g y)
(hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hy : f x = y) : ContinuousAt (g ∘ f) x := by subst hy; exact hg.comp hf
#align continuous_at.comp_of_eq ContinuousAt.comp_of_eq
theorem Continuous.tendsto (hf : Continuous f) (x) : Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x)) :=
((nhds_basis_opens x).tendsto_iff <| nhds_basis_opens <| f x).2 fun t ⟨hxt, ht⟩ =>
⟨f ⁻¹' t, ⟨hxt, ht.preimage hf⟩, Subset.rfl⟩
#align continuous.tendsto Continuous.tendsto
/-- A version of `Continuous.tendsto` that allows one to specify a simpler form of the limit.
E.g., one can write `continuous_exp.tendsto' 0 1 exp_zero`. -/
theorem Continuous.tendsto' (hf : Continuous f) (x : X) (y : Y) (h : f x = y) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) :=
h ▸ hf.tendsto x
#align continuous.tendsto' Continuous.tendsto'
@[fun_prop]
theorem Continuous.continuousAt (h : Continuous f) : ContinuousAt f x :=
h.tendsto x
#align continuous.continuous_at Continuous.continuousAt
theorem continuous_iff_continuousAt : Continuous f ↔ ∀ x, ContinuousAt f x :=
⟨Continuous.tendsto, fun hf => continuous_def.2 fun _U hU => isOpen_iff_mem_nhds.2 fun x hx =>
hf x <| hU.mem_nhds hx⟩
#align continuous_iff_continuous_at continuous_iff_continuousAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_const : ContinuousAt (fun _ : X => y) x :=
tendsto_const_nhds
#align continuous_at_const continuousAt_const
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_const : Continuous fun _ : X => y :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun _ => continuousAt_const
#align continuous_const continuous_const
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.continuousAt (h : f =ᶠ[𝓝 x] fun _ => y) :
ContinuousAt f x :=
(continuousAt_congr h).2 tendsto_const_nhds
#align filter.eventually_eq.continuous_at Filter.EventuallyEq.continuousAt
theorem continuous_of_const (h : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x =>
Filter.EventuallyEq.continuousAt <| eventually_of_forall fun y => h y x
#align continuous_of_const continuous_of_const
theorem continuousAt_id : ContinuousAt id x :=
continuous_id.continuousAt
#align continuous_at_id continuousAt_id
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_id' (y) : ContinuousAt (fun x : X => x) y := continuousAt_id
theorem ContinuousAt.iterate {f : X → X} (hf : ContinuousAt f x) (hx : f x = x) (n : ℕ) :
ContinuousAt f^[n] x :=
Nat.recOn n continuousAt_id fun _n ihn ↦ ihn.comp_of_eq hf hx
#align continuous_at.iterate ContinuousAt.iterate
theorem continuous_iff_isClosed : Continuous f ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed s → IsClosed (f ⁻¹' s) :=
continuous_def.trans <| compl_surjective.forall.trans <| by
simp only [isOpen_compl_iff, preimage_compl]
#align continuous_iff_is_closed continuous_iff_isClosed
theorem IsClosed.preimage (hf : Continuous f) {t : Set Y} (h : IsClosed t) :
IsClosed (f ⁻¹' t) :=
continuous_iff_isClosed.mp hf t h
#align is_closed.preimage IsClosed.preimage
theorem mem_closure_image (hf : ContinuousAt f x)
(hx : x ∈ closure s) : f x ∈ closure (f '' s) :=
mem_closure_of_frequently_of_tendsto
((mem_closure_iff_frequently.1 hx).mono fun _ => mem_image_of_mem _) hf
#align mem_closure_image mem_closure_image
theorem continuousAt_iff_ultrafilter :
ContinuousAt f x ↔ ∀ g : Ultrafilter X, ↑g ≤ 𝓝 x → Tendsto f g (𝓝 (f x)) :=
tendsto_iff_ultrafilter f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 (f x))
#align continuous_at_iff_ultrafilter continuousAt_iff_ultrafilter
theorem continuous_iff_ultrafilter :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ (x) (g : Ultrafilter X), ↑g ≤ 𝓝 x → Tendsto f g (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp only [continuous_iff_continuousAt, continuousAt_iff_ultrafilter]
#align continuous_iff_ultrafilter continuous_iff_ultrafilter
theorem Continuous.closure_preimage_subset (hf : Continuous f) (t : Set Y) :
closure (f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f ⁻¹' closure t := by
rw [← (isClosed_closure.preimage hf).closure_eq]
exact closure_mono (preimage_mono subset_closure)
#align continuous.closure_preimage_subset Continuous.closure_preimage_subset
theorem Continuous.frontier_preimage_subset (hf : Continuous f) (t : Set Y) :
frontier (f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f ⁻¹' frontier t :=
diff_subset_diff (hf.closure_preimage_subset t) (preimage_interior_subset_interior_preimage hf)
#align continuous.frontier_preimage_subset Continuous.frontier_preimage_subset
/-- If a continuous map `f` maps `s` to `t`, then it maps `closure s` to `closure t`. -/
protected theorem Set.MapsTo.closure {t : Set Y} (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hc : Continuous f) : MapsTo f (closure s) (closure t) := by
simp only [MapsTo, mem_closure_iff_clusterPt]
exact fun x hx => hx.map hc.continuousAt (tendsto_principal_principal.2 h)
#align set.maps_to.closure Set.MapsTo.closure
/-- See also `IsClosedMap.closure_image_eq_of_continuous`. -/
theorem image_closure_subset_closure_image (h : Continuous f) :
f '' closure s ⊆ closure (f '' s) :=
((mapsTo_image f s).closure h).image_subset
#align image_closure_subset_closure_image image_closure_subset_closure_image
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
theorem closure_image_closure (h : Continuous f) :
closure (f '' closure s) = closure (f '' s) :=
Subset.antisymm
(closure_minimal (image_closure_subset_closure_image h) isClosed_closure)
(closure_mono <| image_subset _ subset_closure)
theorem closure_subset_preimage_closure_image (h : Continuous f) :
closure s ⊆ f ⁻¹' closure (f '' s) :=
(mapsTo_image _ _).closure h
#align closure_subset_preimage_closure_image closure_subset_preimage_closure_image
theorem map_mem_closure {t : Set Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(hx : x ∈ closure s) (ht : MapsTo f s t) : f x ∈ closure t :=
ht.closure hf hx
#align map_mem_closure map_mem_closure
/-- If a continuous map `f` maps `s` to a closed set `t`, then it maps `closure s` to `t`. -/
theorem Set.MapsTo.closure_left {t : Set Y} (h : MapsTo f s t)
(hc : Continuous f) (ht : IsClosed t) : MapsTo f (closure s) t :=
ht.closure_eq ▸ h.closure hc
#align set.maps_to.closure_left Set.MapsTo.closure_left
theorem Filter.Tendsto.lift'_closure (hf : Continuous f) {l l'} (h : Tendsto f l l') :
Tendsto f (l.lift' closure) (l'.lift' closure) :=
tendsto_lift'.2 fun s hs ↦ by
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (h hs)] using (mapsTo_preimage _ _).closure hf
theorem tendsto_lift'_closure_nhds (hf : Continuous f) (x : X) :
Tendsto f ((𝓝 x).lift' closure) ((𝓝 (f x)).lift' closure) :=
(hf.tendsto x).lift'_closure hf
/-!
### Function with dense range
-/
section DenseRange
variable {α ι : Type*} (f : α → X) (g : X → Y)
variable {f : α → X} {s : Set X}
/-- A surjective map has dense range. -/
theorem Function.Surjective.denseRange (hf : Function.Surjective f) : DenseRange f := fun x => by
simp [hf.range_eq]
#align function.surjective.dense_range Function.Surjective.denseRange
theorem denseRange_id : DenseRange (id : X → X) :=
Function.Surjective.denseRange Function.surjective_id
#align dense_range_id denseRange_id
theorem denseRange_iff_closure_range : DenseRange f ↔ closure (range f) = univ :=
dense_iff_closure_eq
#align dense_range_iff_closure_range denseRange_iff_closure_range
theorem DenseRange.closure_range (h : DenseRange f) : closure (range f) = univ :=
h.closure_eq
#align dense_range.closure_range DenseRange.closure_range
theorem Dense.denseRange_val (h : Dense s) : DenseRange ((↑) : s → X) := by
simpa only [DenseRange, Subtype.range_coe_subtype]
#align dense.dense_range_coe Dense.denseRange_val
theorem Continuous.range_subset_closure_image_dense {f : X → Y} (hf : Continuous f)
(hs : Dense s) : range f ⊆ closure (f '' s) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← hs.closure_eq]
exact image_closure_subset_closure_image hf
#align continuous.range_subset_closure_image_dense Continuous.range_subset_closure_image_dense
/-- The image of a dense set under a continuous map with dense range is a dense set. -/
theorem DenseRange.dense_image {f : X → Y} (hf' : DenseRange f) (hf : Continuous f)
(hs : Dense s) : Dense (f '' s) :=
(hf'.mono <| hf.range_subset_closure_image_dense hs).of_closure
#align dense_range.dense_image DenseRange.dense_image
/-- If `f` has dense range and `s` is an open set in the codomain of `f`, then the image of the
preimage of `s` under `f` is dense in `s`. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,798 | 1,801 | theorem DenseRange.subset_closure_image_preimage_of_isOpen (hf : DenseRange f) (hs : IsOpen s) :
s ⊆ closure (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) := by |
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range]
exact hf.open_subset_closure_inter hs
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
#align_import data.mv_polynomial.monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Monad operations on `MvPolynomial`
This file defines two monadic operations on `MvPolynomial`. Given `p : MvPolynomial σ R`,
* `MvPolynomial.bind₁` and `MvPolynomial.join₁` operate on the variable type `σ`.
* `MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` operate on the coefficient type `R`.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₁ f φ` with `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`,
is the polynomial `φ(f 1, ..., f i, ...) : MvPolynomial τ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₁ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by evaluating `φ` under the map `X f ↦ f` for `f : MvPolynomial σ R`.
In other words, if you have a polynomial `φ` in a set of variables indexed by a polynomial ring,
you evaluate the polynomial in these indexing polynomials.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₂ f φ` with `f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`
is the `MvPolynomial σ S` obtained from `φ` by mapping the coefficients of `φ` through `f`
and considering the resulting polynomial as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₂ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R)` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by considering `φ` as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
These operations themselves have algebraic structure: `MvPolynomial.bind₁`
and `MvPolynomial.join₁` are algebra homs and
`MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` are ring homs.
They interact in convenient ways with `MvPolynomial.rename`, `MvPolynomial.map`,
`MvPolynomial.vars`, and other polynomial operations.
Indeed, `MvPolynomial.rename` is the "map" operation for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair,
whereas `MvPolynomial.map` is the "map" operation for the other pair.
## Implementation notes
We add a `LawfulMonad` instance for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair.
The second pair cannot be instantiated as a `Monad`,
since it is not a monad in `Type` but in `CommRingCat` (or rather `CommSemiRingCat`).
-/
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T]
/--
`bind₁` is the "left hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`, operating on the variable type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and a map `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` taking variables
in `p` to polynomials in the variable type `τ`, `bind₁ f p` replaces each variable in `p` with
its value under `f`, producing a new polynomial in `τ`. The coefficient type remains the same.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval f
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁ MvPolynomial.bind₁
/-- `bind₂` is the "right hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`,
operating on the coefficient type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and
a map `f : R → MvPolynomial σ S` taking coefficients in `p` to polynomials over a new ring `S`,
`bind₂ f p` replaces each coefficient in `p` with its value under `f`,
producing a new polynomial over `S`.
The variable type remains the same. This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S :=
eval₂Hom f X
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂ MvPolynomial.bind₂
/--
`join₁` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₁`. Given a polynomial `p`
with coefficients in `R` whose variables are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₁ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def join₁ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval id
#align mv_polynomial.join₁ MvPolynomial.join₁
/--
`join₂` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₂`. Given a polynomial `p`
with variables in `σ` whose coefficients are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₂ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def join₂ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R) →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X
#align mv_polynomial.join₂ MvPolynomial.join₂
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : aeval f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_eq_bind₁ MvPolynomial.aeval_eq_bind₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : eval₂Hom C f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_C_eq_bind₁ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : eval₂Hom f X = bind₂ f :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_eq_bind₂ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂
section
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_id_eq_join₁ : aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_id_eq_join₁ MvPolynomial.aeval_id_eq_join₁
theorem eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂Hom C id φ = join₁ φ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_C_id_eq_join₁ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂ : eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.eval₂_hom_id_X_eq_join₂ MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
attribute [-simp]
aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁_X_right MvPolynomial.bind₁_X_right
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂Hom_X' f X i
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_X_right MvPolynomial.bind₂_X_right
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) = AlgHom.id R _ := by
ext1 i
simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁_X_left MvPolynomial.bind₁_X_left
variable (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R)
theorem bind₁_C_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (x) : bind₁ f (C x) = C x := algHom_C _ _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁_C_right MvPolynomial.bind₁_C_right
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (r : R) : bind₂ f (C r) = f r :=
eval₂Hom_C f X r
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_C_right MvPolynomial.bind₂_C_right
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_left : bind₂ (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id _ := by ext : 2 <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_C_left MvPolynomial.bind₂_C_left
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_comp_C (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : (bind₂ f).comp C = f :=
RingHom.ext <| bind₂_C_right _
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_comp_C MvPolynomial.bind₂_comp_C
@[simp]
theorem join₂_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₂ (map f φ) = bind₂ f φ := by simp only [join₂, bind₂, eval₂Hom_map_hom, RingHom.id_comp]
#align mv_polynomial.join₂_map MvPolynomial.join₂_map
@[simp]
theorem join₂_comp_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : join₂.comp (map f) = bind₂ f :=
RingHom.ext <| join₂_map _
#align mv_polynomial.join₂_comp_map MvPolynomial.join₂_comp_map
theorem aeval_id_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval id (rename f p) = aeval f p := by rw [aeval_rename, Function.id_comp]
#align mv_polynomial.aeval_id_rename MvPolynomial.aeval_id_rename
@[simp]
theorem join₁_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₁ (rename f φ) = bind₁ f φ :=
aeval_id_rename _ _
#align mv_polynomial.join₁_rename MvPolynomial.join₁_rename
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_id : bind₁ (@id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₁ :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.bind₁_id MvPolynomial.bind₁_id
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_id : bind₂ (RingHom.id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₂ :=
rfl
#align mv_polynomial.bind₂_id MvPolynomial.bind₂_id
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Monad.lean | 219 | 221 | theorem bind₁_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₁ g) (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => bind₁ g (f i)) φ := by |
simp [bind₁, ← comp_aeval]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
#align finset.univ_fin2 Finset.univ_fin2
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply_const Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 86 | 91 | theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by |
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
#align_import data.finsupp.ne_locus from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported functions
Let `α N` be two Types, assume that `N` has a `0` and let `f g : α →₀ N` be finitely supported
functions.
## Main definition
* `Finsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N` is an additive group, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`Finsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α M N P : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : α →₀ N) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x => f x ≠ g x
#align finsupp.ne_locus Finsupp.neLocus
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
#align finsupp.mem_ne_locus Finsupp.mem_neLocus
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
#align finsupp.not_mem_ne_locus Finsupp.not_mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } := by
ext
exact mem_neLocus
#align finsupp.coe_ne_locus Finsupp.coe_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : α →₀ N} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h =>
ext fun a => not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h => h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
#align finsupp.ne_locus_eq_empty Finsupp.neLocus_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : α →₀ N} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
#align finsupp.nonempty_ne_locus_iff Finsupp.nonempty_neLocus_iff
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
#align finsupp.ne_locus_comm Finsupp.neLocus_comm
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
#align finsupp.ne_locus_zero_right Finsupp.neLocus_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : α →₀ N).neLocus f = f.support :=
(neLocus_comm _ _).trans (neLocus_zero_right _)
#align finsupp.ne_locus_zero_left Finsupp.neLocus_zero_left
end NHasZero
section NeLocusAndMaps
theorem subset_mapRange_neLocus [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) : (f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) ⊆ f.neLocus g :=
fun x => by simpa only [mem_neLocus, mapRange_apply, not_imp_not] using congr_arg F
#align finsupp.subset_map_range_ne_locus Finsupp.subset_mapRange_neLocus
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_left [DecidableEq N] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f : α →₀ M) (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ f, Function.Injective fun g => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f g₁).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f g₂) = g₁.neLocus g₂ := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
#align finsupp.zip_with_ne_locus_eq_left Finsupp.zipWith_neLocus_eq_left
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_right [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ M) (g : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ g, Function.Injective fun f => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f₁ g).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f₂ g) = f₁.neLocus f₂ := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
#align finsupp.zip_with_ne_locus_eq_right Finsupp.zipWith_neLocus_eq_right
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/NeLocus.lean | 109 | 113 | theorem mapRange_neLocus_eq [DecidableEq N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) (hF : Function.Injective F) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) = f.neLocus g := by |
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using hF.ne_iff
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteLattice
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
#align_import order.complete_boolean_algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"71b36b6f3bbe3b44e6538673819324d3ee9fcc96"
/-!
# Frames, completely distributive lattices and complete Boolean algebras
In this file we define and provide API for (co)frames, completely distributive lattices and
complete Boolean algebras.
We distinguish two different distributivity properties:
1. `inf_iSup_eq : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i` (finite `⊓` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This is required by `Frame`, `CompleteDistribLattice`, and `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`
(`Coframe`, etc., require the dual property).
2. `iInf_iSup_eq : (⨅ i, ⨆ j, f i j) = ⨆ s, ⨅ i, f i (s i)`
(infinite `⨅` distributes over infinite `⨆`).
This stronger property is called "completely distributive",
and is required by `CompletelyDistribLattice` and `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`.
## Typeclasses
* `Order.Frame`: Frame: A complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`.
* `Order.Coframe`: Coframe: A complete lattice whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`.
* `CompleteDistribLattice`: Complete distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose `⊓` and `⊔`
distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompletelyDistribLattice`: Completely distributive lattices: A complete lattice whose
`⨅` and `⨆` satisfy `iInf_iSup_eq`.
* `CompleteBooleanAlgebra`: Complete Boolean algebra: A Boolean algebra whose `⊓`
and `⊔` distribute over `⨆` and `⨅` respectively.
* `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: Complete atomic Boolean algebra:
A complete Boolean algebra which is additionally completely distributive.
(This implies that it's (co)atom(ist)ic.)
A set of opens gives rise to a topological space precisely if it forms a frame. Such a frame is also
completely distributive, but not all frames are. `Filter` is a coframe but not a completely
distributive lattice.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Complete Heyting algebra*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_Heyting_algebra)
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
-/
set_option autoImplicit true
open Function Set
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Sort w} {κ : ι → Sort w'}
/-- A frame, aka complete Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice whose `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
class Order.Frame (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- `⊓` distributes over `⨆`. -/
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf (a : α) (s : Set α) : a ⊓ sSup s ≤ ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b
#align order.frame Order.Frame
/-- A coframe, aka complete Brouwer algebra or complete co-Heyting algebra, is a complete lattice
whose `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
class Order.Coframe (α : Type*) extends CompleteLattice α where
/-- `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf (a : α) (s : Set α) : ⨅ b ∈ s, a ⊔ b ≤ a ⊔ sInf s
#align order.coframe Order.Coframe
open Order
/-- A complete distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⊔` and `⊓` respectively
distribute over `⨅` and `⨆`. -/
class CompleteDistribLattice (α : Type*) extends Frame α, Coframe α
#align complete_distrib_lattice CompleteDistribLattice
/-- In a complete distributive lattice, `⊔` distributes over `⨅`. -/
add_decl_doc CompleteDistribLattice.iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf
/-- A completely distributive lattice is a complete lattice whose `⨅` and `⨆`
distribute over each other. -/
class CompletelyDistribLattice (α : Type u) extends CompleteLattice α where
protected iInf_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} {κ : ι → Type u} (f : ∀ a, κ a → α) :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)
theorem le_iInf_iSup [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a)) ≤ ⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b :=
iSup_le fun _ => le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ a) (le_iSup _ _)
theorem iInf_iSup_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨅ a, ⨆ b, f a b) = ⨆ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨅ a, f a (g a) :=
(le_antisymm · le_iInf_iSup) <| calc
_ = ⨅ a : range (range <| f ·), ⨆ b : a.1, b.1 := by
simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iInf_range, iSup_subtype, iSup_range]
_ = _ := CompletelyDistribLattice.iInf_iSup_eq _
_ ≤ _ := iSup_le fun g => by
refine le_trans ?_ <| le_iSup _ fun a => Classical.choose (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2
refine le_iInf fun a => le_trans (iInf_le _ ⟨range (f a), a, rfl⟩) ?_
rw [← Classical.choose_spec (g ⟨_, a, rfl⟩).2]
theorem iSup_iInf_le [CompleteLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b) ≤ ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) :=
le_iInf_iSup (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem iSup_iInf_eq [CompletelyDistribLattice α] {f : ∀ a, κ a → α} :
(⨆ a, ⨅ b, f a b) = ⨅ g : ∀ a, κ a, ⨆ a, f a (g a) := by
refine le_antisymm iSup_iInf_le ?_
rw [iInf_iSup_eq]
refine iSup_le fun g => ?_
have ⟨a, ha⟩ : ∃ a, ∀ b, ∃ f, ∃ h : a = g f, h ▸ b = f (g f) := of_not_not fun h => by
push_neg at h
choose h hh using h
have := hh _ h rfl
contradiction
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ a)
refine le_iInf fun b => ?_
obtain ⟨h, rfl, rfl⟩ := ha b
exact iInf_le _ _
instance (priority := 100) CompletelyDistribLattice.toCompleteDistribLattice
[CompletelyDistribLattice α] : CompleteDistribLattice α where
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf a s := calc
_ = ⨅ b : s, ⨆ x : Bool, cond x a b := by simp_rw [iInf_subtype, iSup_bool_eq, cond]
_ = _ := iInf_iSup_eq
_ ≤ _ := iSup_le fun f => by
if h : ∀ i, f i = false then
simp [h, iInf_subtype, ← sInf_eq_iInf]
else
have ⟨i, h⟩ : ∃ i, f i = true := by simpa using h
refine le_trans (iInf_le _ i) ?_
simp [h]
inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf a s := calc
_ = ⨅ x : Bool, ⨆ y : cond x PUnit s, match x with | true => a | false => y.1 := by
simp_rw [iInf_bool_eq, cond, iSup_const, iSup_subtype, sSup_eq_iSup]
_ = _ := iInf_iSup_eq
_ ≤ _ := by
simp_rw [iInf_bool_eq]
refine iSup_le fun g => le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (g false).1)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ (g false).2)
rfl
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toCompletelyDistribLattice [CompleteLinearOrder α] :
CompletelyDistribLattice α where
iInf_iSup_eq {α β} g := by
let lhs := ⨅ a, ⨆ b, g a b
let rhs := ⨆ h : ∀ a, β a, ⨅ a, g a (h a)
suffices lhs ≤ rhs from le_antisymm this le_iInf_iSup
if h : ∃ x, rhs < x ∧ x < lhs then
rcases h with ⟨x, hr, hl⟩
suffices rhs ≥ x from nomatch not_lt.2 this hr
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, x < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_not_le fun h =>
lt_irrefl x (lt_of_lt_of_le hl (le_trans (iInf_le _ a) h))
choose f hf using this
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => le_of_lt (hf a)
else
refine le_of_not_lt fun hrl : rhs < lhs => not_le_of_lt hrl ?_
replace h : ∀ x, x ≤ rhs ∨ lhs ≤ x := by
simpa only [not_exists, not_and_or, not_or, not_lt] using h
have : ∀ a, ∃ b, rhs < g a b := fun a =>
lt_iSup_iff.1 <| lt_of_lt_of_le hrl (iInf_le _ a)
choose f hf using this
have : ∀ a, lhs ≤ g a (f a) := fun a =>
(h (g a (f a))).resolve_left (by simpa using hf a)
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ f)
exact le_iInf fun a => this _
section Frame
variable [Frame α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
instance OrderDual.instCoframe : Coframe αᵒᵈ where
__ := instCompleteLattice
iInf_sup_le_sup_sInf := @Frame.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf α _
#align order_dual.coframe OrderDual.instCoframe
theorem inf_sSup_eq : a ⊓ sSup s = ⨆ b ∈ s, a ⊓ b :=
(Frame.inf_sSup_le_iSup_inf _ _).antisymm iSup_inf_le_inf_sSup
#align inf_Sup_eq inf_sSup_eq
theorem sSup_inf_eq : sSup s ⊓ b = ⨆ a ∈ s, a ⊓ b := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using @inf_sSup_eq α _ s b
#align Sup_inf_eq sSup_inf_eq
theorem iSup_inf_eq (f : ι → α) (a : α) : (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ a = ⨆ i, f i ⊓ a := by
rw [iSup, sSup_inf_eq, iSup_range]
#align supr_inf_eq iSup_inf_eq
theorem inf_iSup_eq (a : α) (f : ι → α) : (a ⊓ ⨆ i, f i) = ⨆ i, a ⊓ f i := by
simpa only [inf_comm] using iSup_inf_eq f a
#align inf_supr_eq inf_iSup_eq
| Mathlib/Order/CompleteBooleanAlgebra.lean | 200 | 202 | theorem iSup₂_inf_eq {f : ∀ i, κ i → α} (a : α) :
(⨆ (i) (j), f i j) ⊓ a = ⨆ (i) (j), f i j ⊓ a := by |
simp only [iSup_inf_eq]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Asymptotics
We introduce these relations:
* `IsBigOWith c l f g` : "f is big O of g along l with constant c";
* `f =O[l] g` : "f is big O of g along l";
* `f =o[l] g` : "f is little o of g along l".
Here `l` is any filter on the domain of `f` and `g`, which are assumed to be the same. The codomains
of `f` and `g` do not need to be the same; all that is needed that there is a norm associated with
these types, and it is the norm that is compared asymptotically.
The relation `IsBigOWith c` is introduced to factor out common algebraic arguments in the proofs of
similar properties of `IsBigO` and `IsLittleO`. Usually proofs outside of this file should use
`IsBigO` instead.
Often the ranges of `f` and `g` will be the real numbers, in which case the norm is the absolute
value. In general, we have
`f =O[l] g ↔ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) =O[l] (fun x ↦ ‖g x‖)`,
and similarly for `IsLittleO`. But our setup allows us to use the notions e.g. with functions
to the integers, rationals, complex numbers, or any normed vector space without mentioning the
norm explicitly.
If `f` and `g` are functions to a normed field like the reals or complex numbers and `g` is always
nonzero, we have
`f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / (g x)) l (𝓝 0)`.
In fact, the right-to-left direction holds without the hypothesis on `g`, and in the other direction
it suffices to assume that `f` is zero wherever `g` is. (This generalization is useful in defining
the Fréchet derivative.)
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter NNReal
namespace Asymptotics
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {E : Type*} {F : Type*} {G : Type*} {E' : Type*}
{F' : Type*} {G' : Type*} {E'' : Type*} {F'' : Type*} {G'' : Type*} {E''' : Type*}
{R : Type*} {R' : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*}
variable [Norm E] [Norm F] [Norm G]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedAddCommGroup G''] [SeminormedRing R]
[SeminormedAddGroup E''']
[SeminormedRing R']
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜']
variable {c c' c₁ c₂ : ℝ} {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G}
variable {f' : α → E'} {g' : α → F'} {k' : α → G'}
variable {f'' : α → E''} {g'' : α → F''} {k'' : α → G''}
variable {l l' : Filter α}
section Defs
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- This version of the Landau notation `IsBigOWith C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on
a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are
avoided by this definition. Probably you want to use `IsBigO` instead of this relation. -/
irreducible_def IsBigOWith (c : ℝ) (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
#align asymptotics.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigOWith` is irreducible. -/
theorem isBigOWith_iff : IsBigOWith c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by rw [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.bound, IsBigOWith.of_bound⟩ := isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided
by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsBigO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =O[" l "] " g:100 => IsBigO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigO` is
irreducible. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g := by rw [IsBigO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isBigO_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_iff
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with a positive constant. -/
theorem isBigO_iff' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff] at h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
refine ⟨max c 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
apply hx.trans
gcongr
exact le_max_left _ _
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
obtain ⟨c, ⟨_, hc⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with the constant in the lower bound. -/
theorem isBigO_iff'' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff'] at h
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)]
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff']
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [← inv_inv c, inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)] at hx
theorem IsBigO.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound
theorem IsBigO.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <| by
simp_rw [one_mul]
exact h
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound' Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound'
theorem IsBigO.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigO_iff.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant
multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero
issues that are avoided by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsLittleO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_o Asymptotics.IsLittleO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =o[" l "] " g:100 => IsLittleO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g := by
rw [IsLittleO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
alias ⟨IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith, IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith⟩ := isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff
alias ⟨IsLittleO.bound, IsLittleO.of_bound⟩ := isLittleO_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o.bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.bound
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_bound
theorem IsLittleO.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def
theorem IsLittleO.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigOWith_iff.2 <| isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def'
theorem IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (h : f =o[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simpa using h.def zero_lt_one
end Defs
/-! ### Conversions -/
theorem IsBigOWith.isBigO (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) : f =O[l] g := by rw [IsBigO_def]; exact ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.isBigOWith (hgf : f =o[l] g) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigOWith
theorem IsLittleO.isBigO (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g :=
hgf.isBigOWith.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigO
theorem IsBigO.isBigOWith : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.weaken (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ := hx
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.weaken Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.weaken
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_pos (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' > 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
⟨max c 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right c 1), h.weaken <| le_max_left c 1⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_pos
theorem IsBigO.exists_pos (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c > 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_pos
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_pos
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
let ⟨c, cpos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos
⟨c, le_of_lt cpos, hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg
theorem IsBigO.exists_nonneg (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_nonneg
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_nonneg
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `IsBigOWith c f g` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.trans
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨c, fun _c' hc' => hc.weaken hc'⟩, fun h => h.exists⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith.trans <| by simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually
theorem IsBigO.exists_mem_basis {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : f =O[l] g')
(hb : l.HasBasis p s) :
∃ c > 0, ∃ i : ι, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ s i, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
flip Exists.imp h.exists_pos fun c h => by
simpa only [isBigOWith_iff, hb.eventually_iff, exists_prop] using h
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_mem_basis Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_mem_basis
theorem isBigOWith_inv (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c⁻¹ l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff' hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_inv Asymptotics.isBigOWith_inv
-- We prove this lemma with strange assumptions to get two lemmas below automatically
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (h₀ : (∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖f x‖) ∨ ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
constructor
· rintro H (_ | n)
· refine (H.def one_pos).mono fun x h₀' => ?_
rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => (hf x).trans ?_) fun hg => hg x
rwa [one_mul] at h₀'
· have : (0 : ℝ) < n.succ := Nat.cast_pos.2 n.succ_pos
exact (isBigOWith_inv this).1 (H.def' <| inv_pos.2 this)
· refine fun H => isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩
have hn₀ : (0 : ℝ) < n := (inv_pos.2 ε0).trans hn
refine ((isBigOWith_inv hn₀).2 (H n)).bound.mono fun x hfg => ?_
refine hfg.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (inv_le_of_inv_le ε0 hn.le) ?_)
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right ((hf x).trans hfg) ?_) fun h => h x
exact inv_pos.2 hn₀
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le_aux Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le : f =o[l] g' ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g' x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inr fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le' : f' =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f' x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inl fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le' Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem isLittleO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc => by simp [Subsingleton.elim (f' _) 0, mul_nonneg hc.le]
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem isBigO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =O[l] g' :=
isLittleO_of_subsingleton.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isBigO_of_subsingleton
section congr
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F}
/-! ### Congruence -/
theorem isBigOWith_congr (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁ ↔ IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
subst c₂
apply Filter.eventually_congr
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with _ e₁ e₂
rw [e₁, e₂]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_congr Asymptotics.isBigOWith_congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr' (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
(isBigOWith_congr hc hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr'
theorem IsBigOWith.congr (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x)
(hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
h.congr' hc (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_left (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f₂ g :=
h.congr rfl hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_left
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_right (h : IsBigOWith c l f g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f g₂ :=
h.congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_right
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_const (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f g) (hc : c₁ = c₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f g :=
h.congr hc (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_const Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_const
theorem isBigO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =O[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =O[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun c => isBigOWith_congr rfl hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_congr Asymptotics.isBigO_congr
theorem IsBigO.congr' (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
(isBigO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr'
theorem IsBigO.congr (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr
theorem IsBigO.congr_left (h : f₁ =O[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =O[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_left
theorem IsBigO.congr_right (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_right
theorem isLittleO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =o[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =o[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun c _hc => isBigOWith_congr (Eq.refl c) hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_o_congr Asymptotics.isLittleO_congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr' (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
(isLittleO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr'
theorem IsLittleO.congr (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr_left (h : f₁ =o[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =o[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_left
theorem IsLittleO.congr_right (h : f =o[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_right
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_O Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
instance transEventuallyEqIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_o Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
instance transEventuallyEqIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsBigOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =O[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =o[l] g₁)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsLittleOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =o[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
end congr
/-! ### Filter operations and transitivity -/
theorem IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto (hcfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β}
(hk : Tendsto k l' l) : IsBigOWith c l' (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hk hcfg.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =O[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =O[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| hfg.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_O.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.comp_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =o[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =o[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (hfg.forall_isBigOWith cpos).comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_o.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.comp_tendsto
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
IsBigOWith c (map k l) f g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
exact eventually_map
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_map Asymptotics.isBigOWith_map
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =O[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =O[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_map Asymptotics.isBigO_map
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =o[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =o[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_o_map Asymptotics.isLittleO_map
theorem IsBigOWith.mono (h : IsBigOWith c l' f g) (hl : l ≤ l') : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hl h.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mono Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mono
theorem IsBigO.mono (h : f =O[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| h.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_O.mono Asymptotics.IsBigO.mono
theorem IsLittleO.mono (h : f =o[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_o.mono Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mono
theorem IsBigOWith.trans (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c' l g k) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith (c * c') l f k := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [hfg, hgk] with x hx hx'
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := hx
_ ≤ c * (c' * ‖k x‖) := by gcongr
_ = c * c' * ‖k x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g) (hgk : g =O[l] k) :
f =O[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_nonneg
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := hgk.isBigOWith
(hc.trans hc' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans
instance transIsBigOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c l g k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact ((hfg this).trans hgk this.le).congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G'} (hfg : f =o[l] g)
(hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hgk.exists_pos
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hc cpos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
instance transIsLittleOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G') (· =o[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact (hfg.trans (hgk this) hc.le).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_isLittleO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g)
(hgk : g =o[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_pos
hc.trans_isLittleO hgk cpos
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
instance transIsBigOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) :
f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hgk.isBigOWith one_pos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans
instance transIsLittleOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) (hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =O[l] k :=
(IsBigO.of_bound' hfg).trans hgk
#align filter.eventually.trans_is_O Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} {l : Filter α}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound' <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans <| Real.le_norm_self _
#align filter.eventually.is_O Filter.Eventually.isBigO
section
variable (l)
theorem isBigOWith_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' hfg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le'
theorem isBigOWith_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
isBigOWith_of_le' l fun x => by
rw [one_mul]
exact hfg x
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le
theorem isBigO_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le' l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le'
theorem isBigO_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le
end
theorem isBigOWith_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : IsBigOWith 1 l f f :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _ => le_rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_refl Asymptotics.isBigOWith_refl
theorem isBigO_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : f =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_refl f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl Asymptotics.isBigO_refl
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ =O[l] f₂ :=
hf.trans_isBigO (isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_le (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f k :=
(hfg.trans (isBigOWith_of_le l hgk) hc).congr_const <| mul_one c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_le
theorem IsBigO.trans_le (hfg : f =O[l] g') (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g' x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =O[l] k :=
hfg.trans (isBigO_of_le l hgk)
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_le
theorem IsLittleO.trans_le (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_of_le _ hgk) zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_le Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_le
theorem isLittleO_irrefl' (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, ‖f' x‖ ≠ 0) : ¬f' =o[l] f' := by
intro ho
rcases ((ho.bound one_half_pos).and_frequently h).exists with ⟨x, hle, hne⟩
rw [one_div, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hle
exact (half_lt_self (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) hne.symm)).not_le hle
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl' Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl'
theorem isLittleO_irrefl (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) : ¬f'' =o[l] f'' :=
isLittleO_irrefl' <| h.mono fun _x => norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl
theorem IsBigO.not_isLittleO (h : f'' =O[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =o[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isLittleO h')
#align asymptotics.is_O.not_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.not_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.not_isBigO (h : f'' =o[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =O[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isBigO h')
#align asymptotics.is_o.not_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.not_isBigO
section Bot
variable (c f g)
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_bot : IsBigOWith c ⊥ f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| trivial
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_bot Asymptotics.isBigOWith_bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_bot : f =O[⊥] g :=
(isBigOWith_bot 1 f g).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_bot Asymptotics.isBigO_bot
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_bot : f =o[⊥] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c _ => isBigOWith_bot c f g
#align asymptotics.is_o_bot Asymptotics.isLittleO_bot
end Bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_pure {x} : IsBigOWith c (pure x) f g ↔ ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_pure Asymptotics.isBigOWith_pure
theorem IsBigOWith.sup (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (h' : IsBigOWith c l' f g) :
IsBigOWith c (l ⊔ l') f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| mem_sup.2 ⟨h.bound, h'.bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup
theorem IsBigOWith.sup' (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (h' : IsBigOWith c' l' f g') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') (l ⊔ l') f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_sup.2 ⟨(h.weaken <| le_max_left c c').bound, (h'.weaken <| le_max_right c c').bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup'
theorem IsBigO.sup (h : f =O[l] g') (h' : f =O[l'] g') : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h'.isBigOWith
(hc.sup' hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.sup Asymptotics.IsBigO.sup
theorem IsLittleO.sup (h : f =o[l] g) (h' : f =o[l'] g) : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).sup (h'.forall_isBigOWith cpos)
#align asymptotics.is_o.sup Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_sup : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' ↔ f =O[l] g' ∧ f =O[l'] g' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_sup Asymptotics.isBigO_sup
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_sup : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g ↔ f =o[l] g ∧ f =o[l'] g :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_sup Asymptotics.isLittleO_sup
theorem isBigOWith_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E} {g' : α → F}
(h : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' ↔
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g' := by
simp_rw [IsBigOWith_def, nhdsWithin_insert, eventually_sup, eventually_pure, h, true_and_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_insert Asymptotics.isBigOWith_insert
protected theorem IsBigOWith.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E}
{g' : α → F} (h1 : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g') (h2 : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) :
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' :=
(isBigOWith_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.insert Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.insert
theorem isLittleO_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'} {g' : α → F'}
(h : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' ↔ g =o[𝓝[s] x] g' := by
simp_rw [IsLittleO_def]
refine forall_congr' fun c => forall_congr' fun hc => ?_
rw [isBigOWith_insert]
rw [h, norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_insert Asymptotics.isLittleO_insert
protected theorem IsLittleO.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'}
{g' : α → F'} (h1 : g =o[𝓝[s] x] g') (h2 : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' :=
(isLittleO_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_o.insert Asymptotics.IsLittleO.insert
/-! ### Simplification : norm, abs -/
section NormAbs
variable {u v : α → ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => |u x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f u :=
@isBigOWith_norm_right _ _ _ _ _ _ f u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_right, IsBigOWith.norm_right⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_right, IsBigOWith.abs_right⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_right : (f =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_right : (f =O[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =O[l] u :=
@isBigO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_right, IsBigO.norm_right⟩ := isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_right, IsBigO.abs_right⟩ := isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_right : (f =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_right : (f =o[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =o[l] u :=
@isLittleO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_right, IsLittleO.norm_right⟩ := isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_right, IsLittleO.abs_right⟩ := isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l u g :=
@isBigOWith_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_left, IsBigOWith.norm_left⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_left, IsBigOWith.abs_left⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =O[l] g ↔ u =O[l] g :=
@isBigO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_left, IsBigO.norm_left⟩ := isBigO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_left, IsBigO.abs_left⟩ := isBigO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =o[l] g ↔ u =o[l] g :=
@isLittleO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_left, IsLittleO.norm_left⟩ := isLittleO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_left, IsLittleO.abs_left⟩ := isLittleO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_left
theorem isBigOWith_norm_norm :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g' :=
isBigOWith_norm_left.trans isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_norm
theorem isBigOWith_abs_abs :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) fun x => |v x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l u v :=
isBigOWith_abs_left.trans isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm, IsBigOWith.norm_norm⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs, IsBigOWith.abs_abs⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_abs
theorem isBigO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =O[l] g' :=
isBigO_norm_left.trans isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_norm
theorem isBigO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =O[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =O[l] v :=
isBigO_abs_left.trans isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_norm, IsBigO.norm_norm⟩ := isBigO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_abs, IsBigO.abs_abs⟩ := isBigO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_abs
theorem isLittleO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =o[l] g' :=
isLittleO_norm_left.trans isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_norm Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_norm
theorem isLittleO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =o[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =o[l] v :=
isLittleO_abs_left.trans isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_abs Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_norm, IsLittleO.norm_norm⟩ := isLittleO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_abs, IsLittleO.abs_abs⟩ := isLittleO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_abs
end NormAbs
/-! ### Simplification: negate -/
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => -g' x) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_right, IsBigOWith.neg_right⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_right : (f =O[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_right, IsBigO.neg_right⟩ := isBigO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_right : (f =o[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_right, IsLittleO.neg_right⟩ := isLittleO_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => -f' x) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_left, IsBigOWith.neg_left⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_neg_left Asymptotics.isBigO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_neg_left, IsBigO.neg_left⟩ := isBigO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.neg_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_neg_left : (fun x => -f' x) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_neg_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_neg_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_neg_left, IsLittleO.neg_left⟩ := isLittleO_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.neg_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.neg_left
/-! ### Product of functions (right) -/
theorem isBigOWith_fst_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l f' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_left _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_fst_prod
theorem isBigOWith_snd_prod : IsBigOWith 1 l g' fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _x => le_max_right _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigOWith_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod : f' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_fst_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod
theorem isBigO_snd_prod : g' =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
isBigOWith_snd_prod.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod
theorem isBigO_fst_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).1) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_fst_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_fst_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_fst_prod'
theorem isBigO_snd_prod' {f' : α → E' × F'} : (fun x => (f' x).2) =O[l] f' := by
simpa [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def] using isBigO_snd_prod (E' := E') (F' := F')
#align asymptotics.is_O_snd_prod' Asymptotics.isBigO_snd_prod'
section
variable (f' k')
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightl (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_fst_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightl (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightl k' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightl
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightl (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (g' x, k' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightl k' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightl Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightl
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_rightr (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
(h.trans isBigOWith_snd_prod hc).congr_const (mul_one c)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_rightr
theorem IsBigO.prod_rightr (h : f =O[l] g') : f =O[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.prod_rightr f' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_rightr
theorem IsLittleO.prod_rightr (h : f =o[l] g') : f =o[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).prod_rightr f' cpos.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_rightr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_rightr
end
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_same (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c l g' k') :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' := by
rw [isBigOWith_iff] at *; filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x using max_le
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_same Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_same
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left (hf : IsBigOWith c l f' k') (hg : IsBigOWith c' l g' k') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' :=
(hf.weaken <| le_max_left c c').prod_left_same (hg.weaken <| le_max_right c c')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l f' k' :=
(isBigOWith_fst_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k') :
IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
(isBigOWith_snd_prod.trans h zero_le_one).congr_const <| one_mul c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.prod_left_snd
theorem isBigOWith_prod_left :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) k' ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' k' ∧ IsBigOWith c l g' k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left_same h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left (hf : f' =O[l] k') (hg : g' =O[l] k') : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' :=
let ⟨_c, hf⟩ := hf.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hg⟩ := hg.isBigOWith
(hf.prod_left hg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → f' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsBigO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' → g' =O[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_O.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsBigO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =O[l] k' ↔ f' =O[l] k' ∧ g' =O[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_prod_left Asymptotics.isBigO_prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left (hf : f' =o[l] k') (hg : g' =o[l] k') :
(fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c hc =>
(hf.forall_isBigOWith hc).prod_left_same (hg.forall_isBigOWith hc)
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_fst : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → f' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_fst_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_fst Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_fst
theorem IsLittleO.prod_left_snd : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' → g' =o[l] k' :=
IsBigO.trans_isLittleO isBigO_snd_prod
#align asymptotics.is_o.prod_left_snd Asymptotics.IsLittleO.prod_left_snd
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_prod_left : (fun x => (f' x, g' x)) =o[l] k' ↔ f' =o[l] k' ∧ g' =o[l] k' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.prod_left_fst, h.prod_left_snd⟩, fun h => h.1.prod_left h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_prod_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_prod_left
theorem IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp (h : IsBigOWith c l f'' g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
Eventually.mono h.bound fun x hx hg => norm_le_zero_iff.1 <| by simpa [hg] using hx
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.eq_zero_imp
theorem IsBigO.eq_zero_imp (h : f'' =O[l] g'') : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hC.eq_zero_imp
#align asymptotics.is_O.eq_zero_imp Asymptotics.IsBigO.eq_zero_imp
/-! ### Addition and subtraction -/
section add_sub
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} {g₁ g₂ : α → F'}
theorem IsBigOWith.add (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ + c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with x hx₁ hx₂ using
calc
‖f₁ x + f₂ x‖ ≤ c₁ * ‖g x‖ + c₂ * ‖g x‖ := norm_add_le_of_le hx₁ hx₂
_ = (c₁ + c₂) * ‖g x‖ := (add_mul _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.add Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.add
theorem IsBigO.add (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c₁, hc₁⟩ := h₁.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c₂, hc₂⟩ := h₂.isBigOWith
(hc₁.add hc₂).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.add Asymptotics.IsBigO.add
theorem IsLittleO.add (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c cpos =>
((h₁.forall_isBigOWith <| half_pos cpos).add (h₂.forall_isBigOWith <|
half_pos cpos)).congr_const (add_halves c)
#align asymptotics.is_o.add Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add
theorem IsLittleO.add_add (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => ‖g₁ x‖ + ‖g₂ x‖ := by
refine (h₁.trans_le fun x => ?_).add (h₂.trans_le ?_) <;> simp [abs_of_nonneg, add_nonneg]
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_add Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_add
theorem IsBigO.add_isLittleO (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
h₁.add h₂.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.add_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.add_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.add_isBigO (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) =O[l] g :=
h₁.isBigO.add h₂
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.add_isLittleO (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g :=
(h₁.add (h₂.forall_isBigOWith (sub_pos.2 hc))).congr_const (add_sub_cancel _ _)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.add_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.add_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.add_isBigOWith (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₂ g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x) g :=
(h₂.add_isLittleO h₁ hc).congr_left fun _ => add_comm _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o.add_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.add_isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.sub (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ + c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sub Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sub
theorem IsBigOWith.sub_isLittleO (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) (hc : c₁ < c₂) :
IsBigOWith c₂ l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add_isLittleO h₂.neg_left hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sub_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sub_isLittleO
theorem IsBigO.sub (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.sub Asymptotics.IsBigO.sub
theorem IsLittleO.sub (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using h₁.add h₂.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.sub Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sub
end add_sub
/-!
### Lemmas about `IsBigO (f₁ - f₂) g l` / `IsLittleO (f₁ - f₂) g l` treated as a binary relation
-/
section IsBigOOAsRel
variable {f₁ f₂ f₃ : α → E'}
theorem IsBigOWith.symm (h : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g) :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) g :=
h.neg_left.congr_left fun _x => neg_sub _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.symm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.symm
theorem isBigOWith_comm :
IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) g :=
⟨IsBigOWith.symm, IsBigOWith.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_comm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_comm
theorem IsBigO.symm (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =O[l] g :=
h.neg_left.congr_left fun _x => neg_sub _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O.symm Asymptotics.IsBigO.symm
theorem isBigO_comm : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g ↔ (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =O[l] g :=
⟨IsBigO.symm, IsBigO.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_comm Asymptotics.isBigO_comm
theorem IsLittleO.symm (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =o[l] g := by
simpa only [neg_sub] using h.neg_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.symm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.symm
theorem isLittleO_comm : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g ↔ (fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x) =o[l] g :=
⟨IsLittleO.symm, IsLittleO.symm⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_comm Asymptotics.isLittleO_comm
theorem IsBigOWith.triangle (h₁ : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) g)
(h₂ : IsBigOWith c' l (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) g) :
IsBigOWith (c + c') l (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.triangle Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.triangle
theorem IsBigO.triangle (h₁ : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g)
(h₂ : (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) =O[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) =O[l] g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O.triangle Asymptotics.IsBigO.triangle
theorem IsLittleO.triangle (h₁ : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g)
(h₂ : (fun x => f₂ x - f₃ x) =o[l] g) : (fun x => f₁ x - f₃ x) =o[l] g :=
(h₁.add h₂).congr_left fun _x => sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o.triangle Asymptotics.IsLittleO.triangle
theorem IsBigO.congr_of_sub (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g ↔ f₂ =O[l] g :=
⟨fun h' => (h'.sub h).congr_left fun _x => sub_sub_cancel _ _, fun h' =>
(h.add h').congr_left fun _x => sub_add_cancel _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_of_sub Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_of_sub
theorem IsLittleO.congr_of_sub (h : (fun x => f₁ x - f₂ x) =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g ↔ f₂ =o[l] g :=
⟨fun h' => (h'.sub h).congr_left fun _x => sub_sub_cancel _ _, fun h' =>
(h.add h').congr_left fun _x => sub_add_cancel _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_of_sub Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_of_sub
end IsBigOOAsRel
/-! ### Zero, one, and other constants -/
section ZeroConst
variable (g g' l)
theorem isLittleO_zero : (fun _x => (0 : E')) =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc =>
univ_mem' fun x => by simpa using mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg <| g' x)
#align asymptotics.is_o_zero Asymptotics.isLittleO_zero
theorem isBigOWith_zero (hc : 0 ≤ c) : IsBigOWith c l (fun _x => (0 : E')) g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' fun x => by simpa using mul_nonneg hc (norm_nonneg <| g' x)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero
theorem isBigOWith_zero' : IsBigOWith 0 l (fun _x => (0 : E')) g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' fun x => by simp
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero'
theorem isBigO_zero : (fun _x => (0 : E')) =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 ⟨0, isBigOWith_zero' _ _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_zero Asymptotics.isBigO_zero
theorem isBigO_refl_left : (fun x => f' x - f' x) =O[l] g' :=
(isBigO_zero g' l).congr_left fun _x => (sub_self _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl_left Asymptotics.isBigO_refl_left
theorem isLittleO_refl_left : (fun x => f' x - f' x) =o[l] g' :=
(isLittleO_zero g' l).congr_left fun _x => (sub_self _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_o_refl_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_refl_left
variable {g g' l}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_zero_right_iff : (IsBigOWith c l f'' fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, exists_prop, true_and_iff, norm_zero, mul_zero,
norm_le_zero_iff, EventuallyEq, Pi.zero_apply]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_zero_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_zero_right_iff : (f'' =O[l] fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.1 hc,
fun h => (isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.2 h : IsBigOWith 1 _ _ _).isBigO⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_zero_right_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_zero_right_iff : (f'' =o[l] fun _x => (0 : F')) ↔ f'' =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => isBigO_zero_right_iff.1 h.isBigO,
fun h => IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c _hc => isBigOWith_zero_right_iff.2 h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_zero_right_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_zero_right_iff
theorem isBigOWith_const_const (c : E) {c' : F''} (hc' : c' ≠ 0) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith (‖c‖ / ‖c'‖) l (fun _x : α => c) fun _x => c' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
apply univ_mem'
intro x
rw [mem_setOf, div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc')]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_const Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_const
theorem isBigO_const_const (c : E) {c' : F''} (hc' : c' ≠ 0) (l : Filter α) :
(fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => c' :=
(isBigOWith_const_const c hc' l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_const Asymptotics.isBigO_const_const
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_const_const_iff {c : E''} {c' : F''} (l : Filter α) [l.NeBot] :
((fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => c') ↔ c' = 0 → c = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne c' 0 with (rfl | hc')
· simp [EventuallyEq]
· simp [hc', isBigO_const_const _ hc']
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_const_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_pure {x} : f'' =O[pure x] g'' ↔ g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 :=
calc
f'' =O[pure x] g'' ↔ (fun _y : α => f'' x) =O[pure x] fun _ => g'' x := isBigO_congr rfl rfl
_ ↔ g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0 := isBigO_const_const_iff _
#align asymptotics.is_O_pure Asymptotics.isBigO_pure
end ZeroConst
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_principal {s : Set α} : IsBigOWith c (𝓟 s) f g ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def, eventually_principal]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_principal Asymptotics.isBigOWith_principal
theorem isBigO_principal {s : Set α} : f =O[𝓟 s] g ↔ ∃ c, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp_rw [isBigO_iff, eventually_principal]
#align asymptotics.is_O_principal Asymptotics.isBigO_principal
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_principal {s : Set α} : f'' =o[𝓟 s] g' ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f'' x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ norm_le_zero_iff.1 ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· simp only [isLittleO_iff, isBigOWith_principal] at h
have : Tendsto (fun c : ℝ => c * ‖g' x‖) (𝓝[>] 0) (𝓝 0) :=
((continuous_id.mul continuous_const).tendsto' _ _ (zero_mul _)).mono_left
inf_le_left
apply le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto tendsto_const_nhds this
apply eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 (eventually_of_forall (fun c hc ↦ ?_))
exact eventually_principal.1 (h hc) x hx
· apply (isLittleO_zero g' _).congr' ?_ EventuallyEq.rfl
exact fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).symm
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_top : IsBigOWith c ⊤ f g ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
rw [IsBigOWith_def, eventually_top]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_top Asymptotics.isBigOWith_top
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_top : f =O[⊤] g ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ := by
simp_rw [isBigO_iff, eventually_top]
#align asymptotics.is_O_top Asymptotics.isBigO_top
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_top : f'' =o[⊤] g' ↔ ∀ x, f'' x = 0 := by
simp only [← principal_univ, isLittleO_principal, mem_univ, forall_true_left]
#align asymptotics.is_o_top Asymptotics.isLittleO_top
section
variable (F)
variable [One F] [NormOneClass F]
theorem isBigOWith_const_one (c : E) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖ l (fun _x : α => c) fun _x => (1 : F) := by simp [isBigOWith_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_one Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_one
theorem isBigO_const_one (c : E) (l : Filter α) : (fun _x : α => c) =O[l] fun _x => (1 : F) :=
(isBigOWith_const_one F c l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_one Asymptotics.isBigO_const_one
theorem isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =o[l] fun _x => c) ↔ f =o[l] fun _x => (1 : F) :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_const_one _ _ _) (norm_pos_iff.2 hc),
fun h => h.trans_isBigO <| isBigO_const_const _ hc _⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_iff_is_o_one Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_one_iff : f' =o[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) ↔ Tendsto f' l (𝓝 0) := by
simp only [isLittleO_iff, norm_one, mul_one, Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall.tendsto_right_iff,
Metric.mem_closedBall, dist_zero_right]
#align asymptotics.is_o_one_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_one_iff : f =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) ↔
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x‖ := by
simp only [isBigO_iff, norm_one, mul_one, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_one_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_one_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_one⟩ := isBigO_one_iff
#align filter.is_bounded_under.is_O_one Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_one
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_one_left_iff : (fun _x => 1 : α → F) =o[l] f ↔ Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop :=
calc
(fun _x => 1 : α → F) =o[l] f ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖(1 : F)‖ ≤ ‖f x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux <| Or.inl fun _x => by simp only [norm_one, zero_le_one]
_ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, True → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ∈ Ici (n : ℝ) := by
simp only [norm_one, mul_one, true_imp_iff, mem_Ici]
_ ↔ Tendsto (fun x => ‖f x‖) l atTop :=
atTop_hasCountableBasis_of_archimedean.1.tendsto_right_iff.symm
#align asymptotics.is_o_one_left_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_one_left_iff
theorem _root_.Filter.Tendsto.isBigO_one {c : E'} (h : Tendsto f' l (𝓝 c)) :
f' =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) :=
h.norm.isBoundedUnder_le.isBigO_one F
#align filter.tendsto.is_O_one Filter.Tendsto.isBigO_one
theorem IsBigO.trans_tendsto_nhds (hfg : f =O[l] g') {y : F'} (hg : Tendsto g' l (𝓝 y)) :
f =O[l] (fun _x => 1 : α → F) :=
hfg.trans <| hg.isBigO_one F
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_tendsto_nhds Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_tendsto_nhds
/-- The condition `f = O[𝓝[≠] a] 1` is equivalent to `f = O[𝓝 a] 1`. -/
lemma isBigO_one_nhds_ne_iff [TopologicalSpace α] {a : α} :
f =O[𝓝[≠] a] (fun _ ↦ 1 : α → F) ↔ f =O[𝓝 a] (fun _ ↦ 1 : α → F) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds⟩
simp only [isBigO_one_iff, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
use max c ‖f a‖
filter_upwards [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.mp hc] with b hb
rcases eq_or_ne b a with rfl | hb'
· apply le_max_right
· exact (hb hb').trans (le_max_left ..)
end
theorem isLittleO_const_iff {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f'' =o[l] fun _x => c) ↔ Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_const_iff_isLittleO_one ℝ hc).trans (isLittleO_one_iff _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_iff
theorem isLittleO_id_const {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (fun x : E'' => x) =o[𝓝 0] fun _x => c :=
(isLittleO_const_iff hc).mpr (continuous_id.tendsto 0)
#align asymptotics.is_o_id_const Asymptotics.isLittleO_id_const
theorem _root_.Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_const (h : IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f))
{c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) : f =O[l] fun _x => c :=
(h.isBigO_one ℝ).trans (isBigO_const_const _ hc _)
#align filter.is_bounded_under.is_O_const Filter.IsBoundedUnder.isBigO_const
theorem isBigO_const_of_tendsto {y : E''} (h : Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 y)) {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
f'' =O[l] fun _x => c :=
h.norm.isBoundedUnder_le.isBigO_const hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_of_tendsto Asymptotics.isBigO_const_of_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.isBoundedUnder_le {c : F} (h : f =O[l] fun _x => c) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f) :=
let ⟨c', hc'⟩ := h.bound
⟨c' * ‖c‖, eventually_map.2 hc'⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_bounded_under_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBoundedUnder_le
theorem isBigO_const_of_ne {c : F''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =O[l] fun _x => c) ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l (norm ∘ f) :=
⟨fun h => h.isBoundedUnder_le, fun h => h.isBigO_const hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_of_ne Asymptotics.isBigO_const_of_ne
theorem isBigO_const_iff {c : F''} : (f'' =O[l] fun _x => c) ↔
(c = 0 → f'' =ᶠ[l] 0) ∧ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f'' x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨fun hc => isBigO_zero_right_iff.1 (by rwa [← hc]), h.isBoundedUnder_le⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨hcf, hf⟩
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (hc | hc)
exacts [(hcf hc).trans_isBigO (isBigO_zero _ _), hf.isBigO_const hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_iff
theorem isBigO_iff_isBoundedUnder_le_div (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, g'' x ≠ 0) :
f =O[l] g'' ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x‖ / ‖g'' x‖ := by
simp only [isBigO_iff, IsBoundedUnder, IsBounded, eventually_map]
exact
exists_congr fun c =>
eventually_congr <| h.mono fun x hx => (div_le_iff <| norm_pos_iff.2 hx).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_bounded_under_le_div Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBoundedUnder_le_div
/-- `(fun x ↦ c) =O[l] f` if and only if `f` is bounded away from zero. -/
theorem isBigO_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm {c : E''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun _x => c) =O[l] f' ↔ ∃ b, 0 < b ∧ ∀ᶠ x in l, b ≤ ‖f' x‖ := by
constructor
· intro h
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, hC₀, hC⟩
refine ⟨‖c‖ / C, div_pos (norm_pos_iff.2 hc) hC₀, ?_⟩
exact hC.bound.mono fun x => (div_le_iff' hC₀).2
· rintro ⟨b, hb₀, hb⟩
refine IsBigO.of_bound (‖c‖ / b) (hb.mono fun x hx => ?_)
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, mul_div_assoc]
exact le_mul_of_one_le_right (norm_nonneg _) ((one_le_div hb₀).2 hx)
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_const_left_iff_pos_le_norm
theorem IsBigO.trans_tendsto (hfg : f'' =O[l] g'') (hg : Tendsto g'' l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).1 <| hfg.trans_isLittleO <| (isLittleO_one_iff ℝ).2 hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.trans_tendsto (hfg : f'' =o[l] g'') (hg : Tendsto g'' l (𝓝 0)) :
Tendsto f'' l (𝓝 0) :=
hfg.isBigO.trans_tendsto hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_tendsto
/-! ### Multiplication by a constant -/
theorem isBigOWith_const_mul_self (c : R) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖ l (fun x => c * f x) f :=
isBigOWith_of_le' _ fun _x => norm_mul_le _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_const_mul_self Asymptotics.isBigOWith_const_mul_self
theorem isBigO_const_mul_self (c : R) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) : (fun x => c * f x) =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self c f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_self Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_self
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (c' : R) :
IsBigOWith (‖c'‖ * c) l (fun x => c' * f x) g :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self c' f l).trans h (norm_nonneg c')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_left
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : f =O[l] g) (c' : R) : (fun x => c' * f x) =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
(hc.const_mul_left c').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_left
theorem isBigOWith_self_const_mul' (u : Rˣ) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖(↑u⁻¹ : R)‖ l f fun x => ↑u * f x :=
(isBigOWith_const_mul_self ↑u⁻¹ (fun x ↦ ↑u * f x) l).congr_left
fun x ↦ u.inv_mul_cancel_left (f x)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_self_const_mul' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_self_const_mul'
theorem isBigOWith_self_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → 𝕜) (l : Filter α) :
IsBigOWith ‖c‖⁻¹ l f fun x => c * f x :=
(isBigOWith_self_const_mul' (Units.mk0 c hc) f l).congr_const <| norm_inv c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_self_const_mul Asymptotics.isBigOWith_self_const_mul
theorem isBigO_self_const_mul' {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (f : α → R) (l : Filter α) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * f x :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ (isBigOWith_self_const_mul' u f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_self_const_mul' Asymptotics.isBigO_self_const_mul'
theorem isBigO_self_const_mul (c : 𝕜) (hc : c ≠ 0) (f : α → 𝕜) (l : Filter α) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * f x :=
isBigO_self_const_mul' (IsUnit.mk0 c hc) f l
#align asymptotics.is_O_self_const_mul Asymptotics.isBigO_self_const_mul
theorem isBigO_const_mul_left_iff' {f : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(fun x => c * f x) =O[l] g ↔ f =O[l] g :=
⟨(isBigO_self_const_mul' hc f l).trans, fun h => h.const_mul_left c⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_left_iff' Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_left_iff'
theorem isBigO_const_mul_left_iff {f : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun x => c * f x) =O[l] g ↔ f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_const_mul_left_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_left_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_left_iff
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_left {f : α → R} (h : f =o[l] g) (c : R) : (fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g :=
(isBigO_const_mul_self c f l).trans_isLittleO h
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_left
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff' {f : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g ↔ f =o[l] g :=
⟨(isBigO_self_const_mul' hc f l).trans_isLittleO, fun h => h.const_mul_left c⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_left_iff' Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff'
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff {f : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun x => c * f x) =o[l] g ↔ f =o[l] g :=
isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_left_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff
theorem IsBigOWith.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f fun x => c * g x) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖c‖) l f g :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_const_mul_self c g l) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsBigO.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (h : f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) : f =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
(hc.of_const_mul_right cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {u : Rˣ} {c' : ℝ} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f g) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖(↑u⁻¹ : R)‖) l f fun x => ↑u * g x :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_self_const_mul' _ _ _) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_right'
theorem IsBigOWith.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) {c' : ℝ} (hc' : 0 ≤ c')
(h : IsBigOWith c' l f g) : IsBigOWith (c' * ‖c‖⁻¹) l f fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans (isBigOWith_self_const_mul c hc g l) hc'
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.const_mul_right
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (h : f =O[l] g) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans (isBigO_self_const_mul' hc g l)
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_right'
theorem IsBigO.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : f =O[l] g) :
f =O[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.const_mul_right' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_mul_right
theorem isBigO_const_mul_right_iff' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =O[l] g :=
⟨fun h => h.of_const_mul_right, fun h => h.const_mul_right' hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_right_iff' Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_right_iff'
theorem isBigO_const_mul_right_iff {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =O[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_const_mul_right_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_mul_right_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_const_mul_right_iff
theorem IsLittleO.of_const_mul_right {g : α → R} {c : R} (h : f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) :
f =o[l] g :=
h.trans_isBigO (isBigO_const_mul_self c g l)
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_const_mul_right
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_right' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) (h : f =o[l] g) :
f =o[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.trans_isBigO (isBigO_self_const_mul' hc g l)
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_right' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_right'
theorem IsLittleO.const_mul_right {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) (h : f =o[l] g) :
f =o[l] fun x => c * g x :=
h.const_mul_right' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_mul_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_mul_right
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff' {g : α → R} {c : R} (hc : IsUnit c) :
(f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =o[l] g :=
⟨fun h => h.of_const_mul_right, fun h => h.const_mul_right' hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_right_iff' Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff'
theorem isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff {g : α → 𝕜} {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =o[l] fun x => c * g x) ↔ f =o[l] g :=
isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff' <| IsUnit.mk0 c hc
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_mul_right_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff
/-! ### Multiplication -/
theorem IsBigOWith.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} {c₁ c₂ : ℝ} (h₁ : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁)
(h₂ : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂) :
IsBigOWith (c₁ * c₂) l (fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with _ hx₁ hx₂
apply le_trans (norm_mul_le _ _)
convert mul_le_mul hx₁ hx₂ (norm_nonneg _) (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) hx₁) using 1
rw [norm_mul, mul_mul_mul_comm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mul Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mul
theorem IsBigO.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =O[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h₁.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h₂.isBigOWith
(hc.mul hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.mul Asymptotics.IsBigO.mul
theorem IsBigO.mul_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₁.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact (hc'.mul (h₂ (div_pos cpos c'pos))).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_O.mul_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.mul_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.mul_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =O[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₂.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact ((h₁ (div_pos cpos c'pos)).mul hc').congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_o.mul_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mul_isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.mul {f₁ f₂ : α → R} {g₁ g₂ : α → 𝕜} (h₁ : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (h₂ : f₂ =o[l] g₂) :
(fun x => f₁ x * f₂ x) =o[l] fun x => g₁ x * g₂ x :=
h₁.mul_isBigO h₂.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.mul Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mul
theorem IsBigOWith.pow' {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) :
∀ n : ℕ, IsBigOWith (Nat.casesOn n ‖(1 : R)‖ fun n => c ^ (n + 1))
l (fun x => f x ^ n) fun x => g x ^ n
| 0 => by simpa using isBigOWith_const_const (1 : R) (one_ne_zero' 𝕜) l
| 1 => by simpa
| n + 2 => by simpa [pow_succ] using (IsBigOWith.pow' h (n + 1)).mul h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.pow' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.pow'
theorem IsBigOWith.pow [NormOneClass R] {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) :
∀ n : ℕ, IsBigOWith (c ^ n) l (fun x => f x ^ n) fun x => g x ^ n
| 0 => by simpa using h.pow' 0
| n + 1 => h.pow' (n + 1)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.pow Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.pow
theorem IsBigOWith.of_pow {n : ℕ} {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → R} (h : IsBigOWith c l (f ^ n) (g ^ n))
(hn : n ≠ 0) (hc : c ≤ c' ^ n) (hc' : 0 ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| (h.weaken hc).bound.mono fun x hx ↦
le_of_pow_le_pow_left hn (by positivity) <|
calc
‖f x‖ ^ n = ‖f x ^ n‖ := (norm_pow _ _).symm
_ ≤ c' ^ n * ‖g x ^ n‖ := hx
_ ≤ c' ^ n * ‖g x‖ ^ n := by gcongr; exact norm_pow_le' _ hn.bot_lt
_ = (c' * ‖g x‖) ^ n := (mul_pow _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_pow Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_pow
theorem IsBigO.pow {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : f =O[l] g) (n : ℕ) :
(fun x => f x ^ n) =O[l] fun x => g x ^ n :=
let ⟨_C, hC⟩ := h.isBigOWith
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 ⟨_, hC.pow' n⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.pow Asymptotics.IsBigO.pow
theorem IsBigO.of_pow {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → R} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : (f ^ n) =O[l] (g ^ n)) :
f =O[l] g := by
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, _hC₀, hC⟩
obtain ⟨c : ℝ, hc₀ : 0 ≤ c, hc : C ≤ c ^ n⟩ :=
((eventually_ge_atTop _).and <| (tendsto_pow_atTop hn).eventually_ge_atTop C).exists
exact (hC.of_pow hn hc hc₀).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_pow Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_pow
theorem IsLittleO.pow {f : α → R} {g : α → 𝕜} (h : f =o[l] g) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) :
(fun x => f x ^ n) =o[l] fun x => g x ^ n := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne'; clear hn
induction' n with n ihn
· simpa only [Nat.zero_eq, ← Nat.one_eq_succ_zero, pow_one]
· convert ihn.mul h <;> simp [pow_succ]
#align asymptotics.is_o.pow Asymptotics.IsLittleO.pow
theorem IsLittleO.of_pow {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → R} {n : ℕ} (h : (f ^ n) =o[l] (g ^ n)) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
f =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c hc => (h.def' <| pow_pos hc _).of_pow hn le_rfl hc.le
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_pow Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_pow
/-! ### Inverse -/
theorem IsBigOWith.inv_rev {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → 𝕜'} (h : IsBigOWith c l f g)
(h₀ : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = 0 → g x = 0) : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => (g x)⁻¹) fun x => (f x)⁻¹ := by
refine IsBigOWith.of_bound (h.bound.mp (h₀.mono fun x h₀ hle => ?_))
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) 0 with hx | hx
· simp only [hx, h₀ hx, inv_zero, norm_zero, mul_zero, le_rfl]
· have hc : 0 < c := pos_of_mul_pos_left ((norm_pos_iff.2 hx).trans_le hle) (norm_nonneg _)
replace hle := inv_le_inv_of_le (norm_pos_iff.2 hx) hle
simpa only [norm_inv, mul_inv, ← div_eq_inv_mul, div_le_iff hc] using hle
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.inv_rev Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.inv_rev
theorem IsBigO.inv_rev {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → 𝕜'} (h : f =O[l] g)
(h₀ : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = 0 → g x = 0) : (fun x => (g x)⁻¹) =O[l] fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
(hc.inv_rev h₀).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.inv_rev Asymptotics.IsBigO.inv_rev
theorem IsLittleO.inv_rev {f : α → 𝕜} {g : α → 𝕜'} (h : f =o[l] g)
(h₀ : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = 0 → g x = 0) : (fun x => (g x)⁻¹) =o[l] fun x => (f x)⁻¹ :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c hc => (h.def' hc).inv_rev h₀
#align asymptotics.is_o.inv_rev Asymptotics.IsLittleO.inv_rev
/-! ### Scalar multiplication -/
section SMulConst
variable [Module R E'] [BoundedSMul R E']
theorem IsBigOWith.const_smul_self (c' : R) :
IsBigOWith (‖c'‖) l (fun x => c' • f' x) f' :=
isBigOWith_of_le' _ fun _ => norm_smul_le _ _
theorem IsBigO.const_smul_self (c' : R) : (fun x => c' • f' x) =O[l] f' :=
(IsBigOWith.const_smul_self _).isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.const_smul_left (h : IsBigOWith c l f' g) (c' : R) :
IsBigOWith (‖c'‖ * c) l (fun x => c' • f' x) g :=
.trans (.const_smul_self _) h (norm_nonneg _)
theorem IsBigO.const_smul_left (h : f' =O[l] g) (c : R) : (c • f') =O[l] g :=
let ⟨_b, hb⟩ := h.isBigOWith
(hb.const_smul_left _).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.const_smul_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.const_smul_left
theorem IsLittleO.const_smul_left (h : f' =o[l] g) (c : R) : (c • f') =o[l] g :=
(IsBigO.const_smul_self _).trans_isLittleO h
#align asymptotics.is_o.const_smul_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.const_smul_left
variable [Module 𝕜 E'] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E']
theorem isBigO_const_smul_left {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) : (fun x => c • f' x) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
have cne0 : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc
rw [← isBigO_norm_left]
simp only [norm_smul]
rw [isBigO_const_mul_left_iff cne0, isBigO_norm_left]
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_smul_left Asymptotics.isBigO_const_smul_left
theorem isLittleO_const_smul_left {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun x => c • f' x) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
have cne0 : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc
rw [← isLittleO_norm_left]
simp only [norm_smul]
rw [isLittleO_const_mul_left_iff cne0, isLittleO_norm_left]
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_smul_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_smul_left
theorem isBigO_const_smul_right {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =O[l] fun x => c • f' x) ↔ f =O[l] f' := by
have cne0 : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc
rw [← isBigO_norm_right]
simp only [norm_smul]
rw [isBigO_const_mul_right_iff cne0, isBigO_norm_right]
#align asymptotics.is_O_const_smul_right Asymptotics.isBigO_const_smul_right
theorem isLittleO_const_smul_right {c : 𝕜} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(f =o[l] fun x => c • f' x) ↔ f =o[l] f' := by
have cne0 : ‖c‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hc
rw [← isLittleO_norm_right]
simp only [norm_smul]
rw [isLittleO_const_mul_right_iff cne0, isLittleO_norm_right]
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_smul_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_smul_right
end SMulConst
section SMul
variable [Module R E'] [BoundedSMul R E'] [Module 𝕜' F'] [BoundedSMul 𝕜' F']
variable {k₁ : α → R} {k₂ : α → 𝕜'}
theorem IsBigOWith.smul (h₁ : IsBigOWith c l k₁ k₂) (h₂ : IsBigOWith c' l f' g') :
IsBigOWith (c * c') l (fun x => k₁ x • f' x) fun x => k₂ x • g' x := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [h₁, h₂] with _ hx₁ hx₂
apply le_trans (norm_smul_le _ _)
convert mul_le_mul hx₁ hx₂ (norm_nonneg _) (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) hx₁) using 1
rw [norm_smul, mul_mul_mul_comm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.smul Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.smul
theorem IsBigO.smul (h₁ : k₁ =O[l] k₂) (h₂ : f' =O[l] g') :
(fun x => k₁ x • f' x) =O[l] fun x => k₂ x • g' x := by
obtain ⟨c₁, h₁⟩ := h₁.isBigOWith
obtain ⟨c₂, h₂⟩ := h₂.isBigOWith
exact (h₁.smul h₂).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.smul Asymptotics.IsBigO.smul
theorem IsBigO.smul_isLittleO (h₁ : k₁ =O[l] k₂) (h₂ : f' =o[l] g') :
(fun x => k₁ x • f' x) =o[l] fun x => k₂ x • g' x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₁.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact (hc'.smul (h₂ (div_pos cpos c'pos))).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_O.smul_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.smul_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.smul_isBigO (h₁ : k₁ =o[l] k₂) (h₂ : f' =O[l] g') :
(fun x => k₁ x • f' x) =o[l] fun x => k₂ x • g' x := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c cpos
rcases h₂.exists_pos with ⟨c', c'pos, hc'⟩
exact ((h₁ (div_pos cpos c'pos)).smul hc').congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ (ne_of_gt c'pos))
#align asymptotics.is_o.smul_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.smul_isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.smul (h₁ : k₁ =o[l] k₂) (h₂ : f' =o[l] g') :
(fun x => k₁ x • f' x) =o[l] fun x => k₂ x • g' x :=
h₁.smul_isBigO h₂.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.smul Asymptotics.IsLittleO.smul
end SMul
/-! ### Sum -/
section Sum
variable {ι : Type*} {A : ι → α → E'} {C : ι → ℝ} {s : Finset ι}
theorem IsBigOWith.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsBigOWith (C i) l (A i) g) :
IsBigOWith (∑ i ∈ s, C i) l (fun x => ∑ i ∈ s, A i x) g := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s is IH
· simp only [isBigOWith_zero', Finset.sum_empty, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [is, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)).add (IH fun j hj => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sum Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sum
theorem IsBigO.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ s, A i =O[l] g) : (fun x => ∑ i ∈ s, A i x) =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def] at *
choose! C hC using h
exact ⟨_, IsBigOWith.sum hC⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.sum Asymptotics.IsBigO.sum
theorem IsLittleO.sum (h : ∀ i ∈ s, A i =o[l] g') : (fun x => ∑ i ∈ s, A i x) =o[l] g' := by
induction' s using Finset.induction_on with i s is IH
· simp only [isLittleO_zero, Finset.sum_empty, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [is, Finset.sum_insert, not_false_iff]
exact (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)).add (IH fun j hj => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj))
#align asymptotics.is_o.sum Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sum
end Sum
/-! ### Relation between `f = o(g)` and `f / g → 0` -/
theorem IsLittleO.tendsto_div_nhds_zero {f g : α → 𝕜} (h : f =o[l] g) :
Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 0) :=
(isLittleO_one_iff 𝕜).mp <| by
calc
(fun x => f x / g x) =o[l] fun x => g x / g x := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using h.mul_isBigO (isBigO_refl _ _)
_ =O[l] fun _x => (1 : 𝕜) := isBigO_of_le _ fun x => by simp [div_self_le_one]
#align asymptotics.is_o.tendsto_div_nhds_zero Asymptotics.IsLittleO.tendsto_div_nhds_zero
theorem IsLittleO.tendsto_inv_smul_nhds_zero [Module 𝕜 E'] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E']
{f : α → E'} {g : α → 𝕜}
{l : Filter α} (h : f =o[l] g) : Tendsto (fun x => (g x)⁻¹ • f x) l (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [div_eq_inv_mul, ← norm_inv, ← norm_smul, ← tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero] using
h.norm_norm.tendsto_div_nhds_zero
#align asymptotics.is_o.tendsto_inv_smul_nhds_zero Asymptotics.IsLittleO.tendsto_inv_smul_nhds_zero
theorem isLittleO_iff_tendsto' {f g : α → 𝕜} (hgf : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x = 0 → f x = 0) :
f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 0) :=
⟨IsLittleO.tendsto_div_nhds_zero, fun h =>
(((isLittleO_one_iff _).mpr h).mul_isBigO (isBigO_refl g l)).congr'
(hgf.mono fun _x => div_mul_cancel_of_imp) (eventually_of_forall fun _x => one_mul _)⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_tendsto' Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_tendsto'
theorem isLittleO_iff_tendsto {f g : α → 𝕜} (hgf : ∀ x, g x = 0 → f x = 0) :
f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 0) :=
isLittleO_iff_tendsto' (eventually_of_forall hgf)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_tendsto Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_tendsto
alias ⟨_, isLittleO_of_tendsto'⟩ := isLittleO_iff_tendsto'
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_tendsto' Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_tendsto'
alias ⟨_, isLittleO_of_tendsto⟩ := isLittleO_iff_tendsto
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_tendsto Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_tendsto
theorem isLittleO_const_left_of_ne {c : E''} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(fun _x => c) =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x => ‖g x‖) l atTop := by
simp only [← isLittleO_one_left_iff ℝ]
exact ⟨(isBigO_const_const (1 : ℝ) hc l).trans_isLittleO,
(isBigO_const_one ℝ c l).trans_isLittleO⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_left_of_ne Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_left_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_const_left {c : E''} :
(fun _x => c) =o[l] g'' ↔ c = 0 ∨ Tendsto (norm ∘ g'') l atTop := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp only [isLittleO_zero, eq_self_iff_true, true_or_iff]
· simp only [hc, false_or_iff, isLittleO_const_left_of_ne hc]; rfl
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_left
@[simp 1001] -- Porting note: increase priority so that this triggers before `isLittleO_const_left`
theorem isLittleO_const_const_iff [NeBot l] {d : E''} {c : F''} :
((fun _x => d) =o[l] fun _x => c) ↔ d = 0 := by
have : ¬Tendsto (Function.const α ‖c‖) l atTop :=
not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds tendsto_const_nhds
simp only [isLittleO_const_left, or_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun h => (this h).elim
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_const_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_pure {x} : f'' =o[pure x] g'' ↔ f'' x = 0 :=
calc
f'' =o[pure x] g'' ↔ (fun _y : α => f'' x) =o[pure x] fun _ => g'' x := isLittleO_congr rfl rfl
_ ↔ f'' x = 0 := isLittleO_const_const_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o_pure Asymptotics.isLittleO_pure
theorem isLittleO_const_id_cobounded (c : F'') :
(fun _ => c) =o[Bornology.cobounded E''] id :=
isLittleO_const_left.2 <| .inr tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_id_comap_norm_at_top Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_id_cobounded
theorem isLittleO_const_id_atTop (c : E'') : (fun _x : ℝ => c) =o[atTop] id :=
isLittleO_const_left.2 <| Or.inr tendsto_abs_atTop_atTop
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_id_at_top Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_id_atTop
theorem isLittleO_const_id_atBot (c : E'') : (fun _x : ℝ => c) =o[atBot] id :=
isLittleO_const_left.2 <| Or.inr tendsto_abs_atBot_atTop
#align asymptotics.is_o_const_id_at_bot Asymptotics.isLittleO_const_id_atBot
/-!
### Eventually (u / v) * v = u
If `u` and `v` are linked by an `IsBigOWith` relation, then we
eventually have `(u / v) * v = u`, even if `v` vanishes.
-/
section EventuallyMulDivCancel
variable {u v : α → 𝕜}
theorem IsBigOWith.eventually_mul_div_cancel (h : IsBigOWith c l u v) : u / v * v =ᶠ[l] u :=
Eventually.mono h.bound fun y hy => div_mul_cancel_of_imp fun hv => by simpa [hv] using hy
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.eventually_mul_div_cancel Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.eventually_mul_div_cancel
/-- If `u = O(v)` along `l`, then `(u / v) * v = u` eventually at `l`. -/
theorem IsBigO.eventually_mul_div_cancel (h : u =O[l] v) : u / v * v =ᶠ[l] u :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.eventually_mul_div_cancel
#align asymptotics.is_O.eventually_mul_div_cancel Asymptotics.IsBigO.eventually_mul_div_cancel
/-- If `u = o(v)` along `l`, then `(u / v) * v = u` eventually at `l`. -/
theorem IsLittleO.eventually_mul_div_cancel (h : u =o[l] v) : u / v * v =ᶠ[l] u :=
(h.forall_isBigOWith zero_lt_one).eventually_mul_div_cancel
#align asymptotics.is_o.eventually_mul_div_cancel Asymptotics.IsLittleO.eventually_mul_div_cancel
end EventuallyMulDivCancel
/-! ### Equivalent definitions of the form `∃ φ, u =ᶠ[l] φ * v` in a `NormedField`. -/
section ExistsMulEq
variable {u v : α → 𝕜}
/-- If `‖φ‖` is eventually bounded by `c`, and `u =ᶠ[l] φ * v`, then we have `IsBigOWith c u v l`.
This does not require any assumptions on `c`, which is why we keep this version along with
`IsBigOWith_iff_exists_eq_mul`. -/
theorem isBigOWith_of_eq_mul {u v : α → R} (φ : α → R) (hφ : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖φ x‖ ≤ c)
(h : u =ᶠ[l] φ * v) :
IsBigOWith c l u v := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
refine h.symm.rw (fun x a => ‖a‖ ≤ c * ‖v x‖) (hφ.mono fun x hx => ?_)
simp only [Pi.mul_apply]
refine (norm_mul_le _ _).trans ?_
gcongr
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_eq_mul Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_eq_mul
theorem isBigOWith_iff_exists_eq_mul (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l u v ↔ ∃ φ : α → 𝕜, (∀ᶠ x in l, ‖φ x‖ ≤ c) ∧ u =ᶠ[l] φ * v := by
constructor
· intro h
use fun x => u x / v x
refine ⟨Eventually.mono h.bound fun y hy => ?_, h.eventually_mul_div_cancel.symm⟩
simpa using div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (norm_nonneg _) hc hy
· rintro ⟨φ, hφ, h⟩
exact isBigOWith_of_eq_mul φ hφ h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff_exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff_exists_eq_mul
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_eq_mul (h : IsBigOWith c l u v) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
∃ φ : α → 𝕜, (∀ᶠ x in l, ‖φ x‖ ≤ c) ∧ u =ᶠ[l] φ * v :=
(isBigOWith_iff_exists_eq_mul hc).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_eq_mul
theorem isBigO_iff_exists_eq_mul :
u =O[l] v ↔ ∃ φ : α → 𝕜, l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (norm ∘ φ) ∧ u =ᶠ[l] φ * v := by
constructor
· rintro h
rcases h.exists_nonneg with ⟨c, hnnc, hc⟩
rcases hc.exists_eq_mul hnnc with ⟨φ, hφ, huvφ⟩
exact ⟨φ, ⟨c, hφ⟩, huvφ⟩
· rintro ⟨φ, ⟨c, hφ⟩, huvφ⟩
exact isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 ⟨c, isBigOWith_of_eq_mul φ hφ huvφ⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_exists_eq_mul
alias ⟨IsBigO.exists_eq_mul, _⟩ := isBigO_iff_exists_eq_mul
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_eq_mul
theorem isLittleO_iff_exists_eq_mul :
u =o[l] v ↔ ∃ φ : α → 𝕜, Tendsto φ l (𝓝 0) ∧ u =ᶠ[l] φ * v := by
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨fun x => u x / v x, h.tendsto_div_nhds_zero, h.eventually_mul_div_cancel.symm⟩
· simp only [IsLittleO_def]
rintro ⟨φ, hφ, huvφ⟩ c hpos
rw [NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero] at hφ
exact isBigOWith_of_eq_mul _ ((hφ c hpos).mono fun x => le_of_lt) huvφ
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_exists_eq_mul
alias ⟨IsLittleO.exists_eq_mul, _⟩ := isLittleO_iff_exists_eq_mul
#align asymptotics.is_o.exists_eq_mul Asymptotics.IsLittleO.exists_eq_mul
end ExistsMulEq
/-! ### Miscellaneous lemmas -/
theorem div_isBoundedUnder_of_isBigO {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → 𝕜} (h : f =O[l] g) :
IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x / g x‖ := by
obtain ⟨c, h₀, hc⟩ := h.exists_nonneg
refine ⟨c, eventually_map.2 (hc.bound.mono fun x hx => ?_)⟩
rw [norm_div]
exact div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (norm_nonneg _) h₀ hx
#align asymptotics.div_is_bounded_under_of_is_O Asymptotics.div_isBoundedUnder_of_isBigO
theorem isBigO_iff_div_isBoundedUnder {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → 𝕜}
(hgf : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x = 0 → f x = 0) :
f =O[l] g ↔ IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) l fun x => ‖f x / g x‖ := by
refine ⟨div_isBoundedUnder_of_isBigO, fun h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
simp only [eventually_map, norm_div] at hc
refine IsBigO.of_bound c (hc.mp <| hgf.mono fun x hx₁ hx₂ => ?_)
by_cases hgx : g x = 0
· simp [hx₁ hgx, hgx]
· exact (div_le_iff (norm_pos_iff.2 hgx)).mp hx₂
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_div_is_bounded_under Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_div_isBoundedUnder
theorem isBigO_of_div_tendsto_nhds {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → 𝕜}
(hgf : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x = 0 → f x = 0) (c : 𝕜) (H : Filter.Tendsto (f / g) l (𝓝 c)) :
f =O[l] g :=
(isBigO_iff_div_isBoundedUnder hgf).2 <| H.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_div_tendsto_nhds Asymptotics.isBigO_of_div_tendsto_nhds
theorem IsLittleO.tendsto_zero_of_tendsto {α E 𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedField 𝕜]
{u : α → E} {v : α → 𝕜} {l : Filter α} {y : 𝕜} (huv : u =o[l] v) (hv : Tendsto v l (𝓝 y)) :
Tendsto u l (𝓝 0) := by
suffices h : u =o[l] fun _x => (1 : 𝕜) by
rwa [isLittleO_one_iff] at h
exact huv.trans_isBigO (hv.isBigO_one 𝕜)
#align asymptotics.is_o.tendsto_zero_of_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.tendsto_zero_of_tendsto
theorem isLittleO_pow_pow {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) : (fun x : 𝕜 => x ^ n) =o[𝓝 0] fun x => x ^ m := by
rcases lt_iff_exists_add.1 h with ⟨p, hp0 : 0 < p, rfl⟩
suffices (fun x : 𝕜 => x ^ m * x ^ p) =o[𝓝 0] fun x => x ^ m * 1 ^ p by
simpa only [pow_add, one_pow, mul_one]
exact IsBigO.mul_isLittleO (isBigO_refl _ _)
(IsLittleO.pow ((isLittleO_one_iff _).2 tendsto_id) hp0)
#align asymptotics.is_o_pow_pow Asymptotics.isLittleO_pow_pow
theorem isLittleO_norm_pow_norm_pow {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n) :
(fun x : E' => ‖x‖ ^ n) =o[𝓝 0] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ m :=
(isLittleO_pow_pow h).comp_tendsto tendsto_norm_zero
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_pow_norm_pow Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_pow_norm_pow
theorem isLittleO_pow_id {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) : (fun x : 𝕜 => x ^ n) =o[𝓝 0] fun x => x := by
convert isLittleO_pow_pow h (𝕜 := 𝕜)
simp only [pow_one]
#align asymptotics.is_o_pow_id Asymptotics.isLittleO_pow_id
theorem isLittleO_norm_pow_id {n : ℕ} (h : 1 < n) :
(fun x : E' => ‖x‖ ^ n) =o[𝓝 0] fun x => x := by
have := @isLittleO_norm_pow_norm_pow E' _ _ _ h
simp only [pow_one] at this
exact isLittleO_norm_right.mp this
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_pow_id Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_pow_id
theorem IsBigO.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within {f : E'' → F''} {s : Set E''} {x₀ : E''} {n : ℕ}
(h : f =O[𝓝[s] x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ s) (hn : n ≠ 0) : f x₀ = 0 :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ h.eq_zero_imp <| by simp_rw [sub_self, norm_zero, zero_pow hn]
#align asymptotics.is_O.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within Asymptotics.IsBigO.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within
theorem IsBigO.eq_zero_of_norm_pow {f : E'' → F''} {x₀ : E''} {n : ℕ}
(h : f =O[𝓝 x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n) (hn : n ≠ 0) : f x₀ = 0 := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ] at h
exact h.eq_zero_of_norm_pow_within (mem_univ _) hn
#align asymptotics.is_O.eq_zero_of_norm_pow Asymptotics.IsBigO.eq_zero_of_norm_pow
theorem isLittleO_pow_sub_pow_sub (x₀ : E') {n m : ℕ} (h : n < m) :
(fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ m) =o[𝓝 x₀] fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ n :=
haveI : Tendsto (fun x => ‖x - x₀‖) (𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 0) := by
apply tendsto_norm_zero.comp
rw [← sub_self x₀]
exact tendsto_id.sub tendsto_const_nhds
(isLittleO_pow_pow h).comp_tendsto this
#align asymptotics.is_o_pow_sub_pow_sub Asymptotics.isLittleO_pow_sub_pow_sub
theorem isLittleO_pow_sub_sub (x₀ : E') {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
(fun x => ‖x - x₀‖ ^ m) =o[𝓝 x₀] fun x => x - x₀ := by
simpa only [isLittleO_norm_right, pow_one] using isLittleO_pow_sub_pow_sub x₀ h
#align asymptotics.is_o_pow_sub_sub Asymptotics.isLittleO_pow_sub_sub
theorem IsBigOWith.right_le_sub_of_lt_one {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ f₂) (hc : c < 1) :
IsBigOWith (1 / (1 - c)) l f₂ fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx => by
simp only [mem_setOf_eq] at hx ⊢
rw [mul_comm, one_div, ← div_eq_mul_inv, _root_.le_div_iff, mul_sub, mul_one, mul_comm]
· exact le_trans (sub_le_sub_left hx _) (norm_sub_norm_le _ _)
· exact sub_pos.2 hc
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.right_le_sub_of_lt_1 Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.right_le_sub_of_lt_one
theorem IsBigOWith.right_le_add_of_lt_one {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ f₂) (hc : c < 1) :
IsBigOWith (1 / (1 - c)) l f₂ fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x :=
(h.neg_right.right_le_sub_of_lt_one hc).neg_right.of_neg_left.congr rfl (fun x ↦ rfl) fun x ↦ by
rw [neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.right_le_add_of_lt_1 Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.right_le_add_of_lt_one
-- 2024-01-31
@[deprecated] alias IsBigOWith.right_le_sub_of_lt_1 := IsBigOWith.right_le_sub_of_lt_one
@[deprecated] alias IsBigOWith.right_le_add_of_lt_1 := IsBigOWith.right_le_add_of_lt_one
theorem IsLittleO.right_isBigO_sub {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} (h : f₁ =o[l] f₂) :
f₂ =O[l] fun x => f₂ x - f₁ x :=
((h.def' one_half_pos).right_le_sub_of_lt_one one_half_lt_one).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.right_is_O_sub Asymptotics.IsLittleO.right_isBigO_sub
theorem IsLittleO.right_isBigO_add {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} (h : f₁ =o[l] f₂) :
f₂ =O[l] fun x => f₁ x + f₂ x :=
((h.def' one_half_pos).right_le_add_of_lt_one one_half_lt_one).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.right_is_O_add Asymptotics.IsLittleO.right_isBigO_add
theorem IsLittleO.right_isBigO_add' {f₁ f₂ : α → E'} (h : f₁ =o[l] f₂) :
f₂ =O[l] (f₂ + f₁) :=
add_comm f₁ f₂ ▸ h.right_isBigO_add
/-- If `f x = O(g x)` along `cofinite`, then there exists a positive constant `C` such that
`‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖` whenever `g x ≠ 0`. -/
theorem bound_of_isBigO_cofinite (h : f =O[cofinite] g'') :
∃ C > 0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, g'' x ≠ 0 → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g'' x‖ := by
rcases h.exists_pos with ⟨C, C₀, hC⟩
rw [IsBigOWith_def, eventually_cofinite] at hC
rcases (hC.toFinset.image fun x => ‖f x‖ / ‖g'' x‖).exists_le with ⟨C', hC'⟩
have : ∀ x, C * ‖g'' x‖ < ‖f x‖ → ‖f x‖ / ‖g'' x‖ ≤ C' := by simpa using hC'
refine ⟨max C C', lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl C₀), fun x h₀ => ?_⟩
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg _), le_max_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, not_le]
exact fun hx => (div_le_iff (norm_pos_iff.2 h₀)).1 (this _ hx)
#align asymptotics.bound_of_is_O_cofinite Asymptotics.bound_of_isBigO_cofinite
theorem isBigO_cofinite_iff (h : ∀ x, g'' x = 0 → f'' x = 0) :
f'' =O[cofinite] g'' ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f'' x‖ ≤ C * ‖g'' x‖ :=
⟨fun h' =>
let ⟨C, _C₀, hC⟩ := bound_of_isBigO_cofinite h'
⟨C, fun x => if hx : g'' x = 0 then by simp [h _ hx, hx] else hC hx⟩,
fun h => (isBigO_top.2 h).mono le_top⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_cofinite_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_cofinite_iff
theorem bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop {f : ℕ → E} {g'' : ℕ → E''} (h : f =O[atTop] g'') :
∃ C > 0, ∀ ⦃x⦄, g'' x ≠ 0 → ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g'' x‖ :=
bound_of_isBigO_cofinite <| by rwa [Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop]
#align asymptotics.bound_of_is_O_nat_at_top Asymptotics.bound_of_isBigO_nat_atTop
theorem isBigO_nat_atTop_iff {f : ℕ → E''} {g : ℕ → F''} (h : ∀ x, g x = 0 → f x = 0) :
f =O[atTop] g ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖g x‖ := by
rw [← Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop, isBigO_cofinite_iff h]
#align asymptotics.is_O_nat_at_top_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_nat_atTop_iff
theorem isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff {f : ℕ → E''} :
f =O[atTop] (fun _n => 1 : ℕ → ℝ) ↔ ∃ C, ∀ n, ‖f n‖ ≤ C :=
Iff.trans (isBigO_nat_atTop_iff fun n h => (one_ne_zero h).elim) <| by
simp only [norm_one, mul_one]
#align asymptotics.is_O_one_nat_at_top_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_one_nat_atTop_iff
theorem isBigOWith_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {E' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E' i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, E' i} {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) :
IsBigOWith C l f g' ↔ ∀ i, IsBigOWith C l (fun x => f x i) g' := by
have : ∀ x, 0 ≤ C * ‖g' x‖ := fun x => mul_nonneg hC (norm_nonneg _)
simp only [isBigOWith_iff, pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (this _), eventually_all]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_pi Asymptotics.isBigOWith_pi
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {E' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E' i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, E' i} : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ i, (fun x => f x i) =O[l] g' := by
simp only [isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith, ← eventually_all]
exact eventually_congr (eventually_atTop.2 ⟨0, fun c => isBigOWith_pi⟩)
#align asymptotics.is_O_pi Asymptotics.isBigO_pi
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_pi {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {E' : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E' i)]
{f : α → ∀ i, E' i} : f =o[l] g' ↔ ∀ i, (fun x => f x i) =o[l] g' := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [IsLittleO_def, isBigOWith_pi, le_of_lt]
exact ⟨fun h i c hc => h hc i, fun h c hc i => h i hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_pi Asymptotics.isLittleO_pi
theorem IsBigO.natCast_atTop {R : Type*} [StrictOrderedSemiring R] [Archimedean R]
{f : R → E} {g : R → F} (h : f =O[atTop] g) :
(fun (n : ℕ) => f n) =O[atTop] (fun n => g n) :=
IsBigO.comp_tendsto h tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias IsBigO.nat_cast_atTop := IsBigO.natCast_atTop
theorem IsLittleO.natCast_atTop {R : Type*} [StrictOrderedSemiring R] [Archimedean R]
{f : R → E} {g : R → F} (h : f =o[atTop] g) :
(fun (n : ℕ) => f n) =o[atTop] (fun n => g n) :=
IsLittleO.comp_tendsto h tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias IsLittleO.nat_cast_atTop := IsLittleO.natCast_atTop
theorem isBigO_atTop_iff_eventually_exists {α : Type*} [SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α]
{f : α → E} {g : α → F} : f =O[atTop] g ↔ ∀ᶠ n₀ in atTop, ∃ c, ∀ n ≥ n₀, ‖f n‖ ≤ c * ‖g n‖ := by
rw [isBigO_iff, exists_eventually_atTop]
theorem isBigO_atTop_iff_eventually_exists_pos {α : Type*}
[SemilatticeSup α] [Nonempty α] {f : α → G} {g : α → G'} :
f =O[atTop] g ↔ ∀ᶠ n₀ in atTop, ∃ c > 0, ∀ n ≥ n₀, c * ‖f n‖ ≤ ‖g n‖ := by
simp_rw [isBigO_iff'', ← exists_prop, Subtype.exists', exists_eventually_atTop]
end Asymptotics
open Asymptotics
theorem summable_of_isBigO {ι E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [CompleteSpace E]
{f : ι → E} {g : ι → ℝ} (hg : Summable g) (h : f =O[cofinite] g) : Summable f :=
let ⟨C, hC⟩ := h.isBigOWith
.of_norm_bounded_eventually (fun x => C * ‖g x‖) (hg.abs.mul_left _) hC.bound
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align summable_of_is_O summable_of_isBigO
theorem summable_of_isBigO_nat {E} [SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [CompleteSpace E]
{f : ℕ → E} {g : ℕ → ℝ} (hg : Summable g) (h : f =O[atTop] g) : Summable f :=
summable_of_isBigO hg <| Nat.cofinite_eq_atTop.symm ▸ h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align summable_of_is_O_nat summable_of_isBigO_nat
lemma Asymptotics.IsBigO.comp_summable_norm {ι E F : Type*}
[SeminormedAddCommGroup E] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F] {f : E → F} {g : ι → E}
(hf : f =O[𝓝 0] id) (hg : Summable (‖g ·‖)) : Summable (‖f <| g ·‖) :=
summable_of_isBigO hg <| hf.norm_norm.comp_tendsto <|
tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero.2 hg.tendsto_cofinite_zero
namespace PartialHomeomorph
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
variable {E : Type*} [Norm E] {F : Type*} [Norm F]
/-- Transfer `IsBigOWith` over a `PartialHomeomorph`. -/
theorem isBigOWith_congr (e : PartialHomeomorph α β) {b : β} (hb : b ∈ e.target) {f : β → E}
{g : β → F} {C : ℝ} : IsBigOWith C (𝓝 b) f g ↔ IsBigOWith C (𝓝 (e.symm b)) (f ∘ e) (g ∘ e) :=
⟨fun h =>
h.comp_tendsto <| by
have := e.continuousAt (e.map_target hb)
rwa [ContinuousAt, e.rightInvOn hb] at this,
fun h =>
(h.comp_tendsto (e.continuousAt_symm hb)).congr' rfl
((e.eventually_right_inverse hb).mono fun x hx => congr_arg f hx)
((e.eventually_right_inverse hb).mono fun x hx => congr_arg g hx)⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align local_homeomorph.is_O_with_congr PartialHomeomorph.isBigOWith_congr
/-- Transfer `IsBigO` over a `PartialHomeomorph`. -/
theorem isBigO_congr (e : PartialHomeomorph α β) {b : β} (hb : b ∈ e.target) {f : β → E}
{g : β → F} : f =O[𝓝 b] g ↔ (f ∘ e) =O[𝓝 (e.symm b)] (g ∘ e) := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun C => e.isBigOWith_congr hb
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align local_homeomorph.is_O_congr PartialHomeomorph.isBigO_congr
/-- Transfer `IsLittleO` over a `PartialHomeomorph`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/Asymptotics.lean | 2,297 | 2,300 | theorem isLittleO_congr (e : PartialHomeomorph α β) {b : β} (hb : b ∈ e.target) {f : β → E}
{g : β → F} : f =o[𝓝 b] g ↔ (f ∘ e) =o[𝓝 (e.symm b)] (g ∘ e) := by |
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun c _hc => e.isBigOWith_congr hb
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.PiL2
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Additive.AP.Three.Defs
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.Pigeonhole
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.ExponentialBounds
#align_import combinatorics.additive.behrend from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-!
# Behrend's bound on Roth numbers
This file proves Behrend's lower bound on Roth numbers. This says that we can find a subset of
`{1, ..., n}` of size `n / exp (O (sqrt (log n)))` which does not contain arithmetic progressions of
length `3`.
The idea is that the sphere (in the `n` dimensional Euclidean space) doesn't contain arithmetic
progressions (literally) because the corresponding ball is strictly convex. Thus we can take
integer points on that sphere and map them onto `ℕ` in a way that preserves arithmetic progressions
(`Behrend.map`).
## Main declarations
* `Behrend.sphere`: The intersection of the Euclidean sphere with the positive integer quadrant.
This is the set that we will map on `ℕ`.
* `Behrend.map`: Given a natural number `d`, `Behrend.map d : ℕⁿ → ℕ` reads off the coordinates as
digits in base `d`.
* `Behrend.card_sphere_le_rothNumberNat`: Implicit lower bound on Roth numbers in terms of
`Behrend.sphere`.
* `Behrend.roth_lower_bound`: Behrend's explicit lower bound on Roth numbers.
## References
* [Bryan Gillespie, *Behrend’s Construction*]
(http://www.epsilonsmall.com/resources/behrends-construction/behrend.pdf)
* Behrend, F. A., "On sets of integers which contain no three terms in arithmetical progression"
* [Wikipedia, *Salem-Spencer set*](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salem–Spencer_set)
## Tags
3AP-free, Salem-Spencer, Behrend construction, arithmetic progression, sphere, strictly convex
-/
open Nat hiding log
open Finset Metric Real
open scoped Pointwise
/-- The frontier of a closed strictly convex set only contains trivial arithmetic progressions.
The idea is that an arithmetic progression is contained on a line and the frontier of a strictly
convex set does not contain lines. -/
lemma threeAPFree_frontier {𝕜 E : Type*} [LinearOrderedField 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace E]
[AddCommMonoid E] [Module 𝕜 E] {s : Set E} (hs₀ : IsClosed s) (hs₁ : StrictConvex 𝕜 s) :
ThreeAPFree (frontier s) := by
intro a ha b hb c hc habc
obtain rfl : (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • a + (1 / 2 : 𝕜) • c = b := by
rwa [← smul_add, one_div, inv_smul_eq_iff₀ (show (2 : 𝕜) ≠ 0 by norm_num), two_smul]
have :=
hs₁.eq (hs₀.frontier_subset ha) (hs₀.frontier_subset hc) one_half_pos one_half_pos
(add_halves _) hb.2
simp [this, ← add_smul]
ring_nf
simp
#align add_salem_spencer_frontier threeAPFree_frontier
lemma threeAPFree_sphere {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[StrictConvexSpace ℝ E] (x : E) (r : ℝ) : ThreeAPFree (sphere x r) := by
obtain rfl | hr := eq_or_ne r 0
· rw [sphere_zero]
exact threeAPFree_singleton _
· convert threeAPFree_frontier isClosed_ball (strictConvex_closedBall ℝ x r)
exact (frontier_closedBall _ hr).symm
#align add_salem_spencer_sphere threeAPFree_sphere
namespace Behrend
variable {α β : Type*} {n d k N : ℕ} {x : Fin n → ℕ}
/-!
### Turning the sphere into 3AP-free set
We define `Behrend.sphere`, the intersection of the $L^2$ sphere with the positive quadrant of
integer points. Because the $L^2$ closed ball is strictly convex, the $L^2$ sphere and
`Behrend.sphere` are 3AP-free (`threeAPFree_sphere`). Then we can turn this set in
`Fin n → ℕ` into a set in `ℕ` using `Behrend.map`, which preserves `ThreeAPFree` because it is
an additive monoid homomorphism.
-/
/-- The box `{0, ..., d - 1}^n` as a `Finset`. -/
def box (n d : ℕ) : Finset (Fin n → ℕ) :=
Fintype.piFinset fun _ => range d
#align behrend.box Behrend.box
theorem mem_box : x ∈ box n d ↔ ∀ i, x i < d := by simp only [box, Fintype.mem_piFinset, mem_range]
#align behrend.mem_box Behrend.mem_box
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Additive/AP/Three/Behrend.lean | 101 | 101 | theorem card_box : (box n d).card = d ^ n := by | simp [box]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anatole Dedecker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergenceTopology
#align_import topology.uniform_space.equicontinuity from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Equicontinuity of a family of functions
Let `X` be a topological space and `α` a `UniformSpace`. A family of functions `F : ι → X → α`
is said to be *equicontinuous at a point `x₀ : X`* when, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` such that, for all `x ∈ V`, and *for all `i`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to
`F i x₀`. In other words, one has `∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x, ∀ i, dist x₀ x < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
`F` is said to be *equicontinuous* if it is equicontinuous at each point.
A closely related concept is that of ***uniform*** *equicontinuity* of a family of functions
`F : ι → β → α` between uniform spaces, which means that, for any entourage `U` in `α`, there is an
entourage `V` in `β` such that, if `x` and `y` are `V`-close, then *for all `i`*, `F i x` and
`F i y` are `U`-close. In other words, one has
`∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U`.
For maps between metric spaces, this corresponds to
`∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x y, ∀ i, dist x y < δ → dist (F i x₀) (F i x) < ε`.
## Main definitions
* `EquicontinuousAt`: equicontinuity of a family of functions at a point
* `Equicontinuous`: equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
* `UniformEquicontinuous`: uniform equicontinuity of a family of functions on the whole domain
We also introduce relative versions, namely `EquicontinuousWithinAt`, `EquicontinuousOn` and
`UniformEquicontinuousOn`, akin to `ContinuousWithinAt`, `ContinuousOn` and `UniformContinuousOn`
respectively.
## Main statements
* `equicontinuous_iff_continuous`: equicontinuity can be expressed as a simple continuity
condition between well-chosen function spaces. This is really useful for building up the theory.
* `Equicontinuous.closure`: if a set of functions is equicontinuous, its closure
*for the topology of pointwise convergence* is also equicontinuous.
## Notations
Throughout this file, we use :
- `ι`, `κ` for indexing types
- `X`, `Y`, `Z` for topological spaces
- `α`, `β`, `γ` for uniform spaces
## Implementation details
We choose to express equicontinuity as a properties of indexed families of functions rather
than sets of functions for the following reasons:
- it is really easy to express equicontinuity of `H : Set (X → α)` using our setup: it is just
equicontinuity of the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)`. On the other hand, going the other way around
would require working with the range of the family, which is always annoying because it
introduces useless existentials.
- in most applications, one doesn't work with bare functions but with a more specific hom type
`hom`. Equicontinuity of a set `H : Set hom` would then have to be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn '' H`, which is super annoying to work with. This is much simpler with families,
because equicontinuity of a family `𝓕 : ι → hom` would simply be expressed as equicontinuity
of `coe_fn ∘ 𝓕`, which doesn't introduce any nasty existentials.
To simplify statements, we do provide abbreviations `Set.EquicontinuousAt`, `Set.Equicontinuous`
and `Set.UniformEquicontinuous` asserting the corresponding fact about the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` where `H : Set (X → α)`. Note however that these won't work for sets of hom
types, and in that case one should go back to the family definition rather than using `Set.image`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology, Chapter X*][bourbaki1966]
## Tags
equicontinuity, uniform convergence, ascoli
-/
section
open UniformSpace Filter Set Uniformity Topology UniformConvergence Function
variable {ι κ X X' Y Z α α' β β' γ 𝓕 : Type*} [tX : TopologicalSpace X] [tY : TopologicalSpace Y]
[tZ : TopologicalSpace Z] [uα : UniformSpace α] [uβ : UniformSpace β] [uγ : UniformSpace γ]
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a neighborhood `V` of `x₀`
such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousAt (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
#align equicontinuous_at EquicontinuousAt
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousAt (H : Set <| X → α) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : H → X → α) x₀
#align set.equicontinuous_at Set.EquicontinuousAt
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous at `x₀ : X` within `S : Set X`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a
neighborhood `V` of `x₀` within `S` such that, for all `x ∈ V` and for all `i : ι`, `F i x` is
`U`-close to `F i x₀`. -/
def EquicontinuousWithinAt (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous at a point within a subset
if the family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous at that point within that same subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : H → X → α) S x₀
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous* on all of `X` if it is equicontinuous at each point of `X`. -/
def Equicontinuous (F : ι → X → α) : Prop :=
∀ x₀, EquicontinuousAt F x₀
#align equicontinuous Equicontinuous
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.Equicontinuous (H : Set <| X → α) : Prop :=
Equicontinuous ((↑) : H → X → α)
#align set.equicontinuous Set.Equicontinuous
/-- A family `F : ι → X → α` of functions from a topological space to a uniform space is
*equicontinuous on `S : Set X`* if it is equicontinuous *within `S`* at each point of `S`. -/
def EquicontinuousOn (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
∀ x₀ ∈ S, EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is equicontinuous on a subset if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.EquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| X → α) (S : Set X) : Prop :=
EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → X → α) S
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is *uniformly equicontinuous* if,
for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is an entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are
`V`-close, we have that, *for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuous (F : ι → β → α) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
#align uniform_equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous if the family
`(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuous (H : Set <| β → α) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : H → β → α)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous Set.UniformEquicontinuous
/-- A family `F : ι → β → α` of functions between uniform spaces is
*uniformly equicontinuous on `S : Set β`* if, for all entourages `U ∈ 𝓤 α`, there is a relative
entourage `V ∈ 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)` such that, whenever `x` and `y` are `V`-close, we have that,
*for all `i : ι`*, `F i x` is `U`-close to `F i y`. -/
def UniformEquicontinuousOn (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S), ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ U
/-- We say that a set `H : Set (X → α)` of functions is uniformly equicontinuous on a subset if the
family `(↑) : ↥H → (X → α)` is uniformly equicontinuous on that subset. -/
protected abbrev Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn (H : Set <| β → α) (S : Set β) : Prop :=
UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : H → β → α) S
lemma EquicontinuousAt.equicontinuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (H : EquicontinuousAt F x₀)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousWithinAt F T x₀) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| nhdsWithin_mono x₀ hST
@[simp] lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F univ x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt F x₀ := by
rw [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt, nhdsWithin_univ]
lemma equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} (x₀ : S) :
EquicontinuousAt (S.restrict ∘ F) x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, EquicontinuousAt,
← eventually_nhds_subtype_iff]
lemma Equicontinuous.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → X → α} (H : Equicontinuous F)
(S : Set X) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x _ ↦ (H x).equicontinuousWithinAt S
lemma EquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → X → α} {S T : Set X}
(H : EquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x hx ↦ (H x (hST hx)).mono hST
lemma equicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → X → α) :
EquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ Equicontinuous F := by
simp [EquicontinuousOn, Equicontinuous]
lemma equicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → X → α) {S : Set X} :
Equicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ EquicontinuousOn F S := by
simp [Equicontinuous, EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousAt_restrict_iff]
lemma UniformEquicontinuous.uniformEquicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} (H : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(S : Set β) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono inf_le_left
lemma UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {F : ι → β → α} {S T : Set β}
(H : UniformEquicontinuousOn F T) (hST : S ⊆ T) : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun U hU ↦ (H U hU).filter_mono <| by gcongr
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_univ (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F univ ↔ UniformEquicontinuous F := by
simp [UniformEquicontinuousOn, UniformEquicontinuous]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_restrict_iff (F : ι → β → α) {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuous (S.restrict ∘ F) ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn F S := by
rw [UniformEquicontinuous, UniformEquicontinuousOn]
conv in _ ⊓ _ => rw [← Subtype.range_val (s := S), ← range_prod_map, ← map_comap]
rfl
/-!
### Empty index type
-/
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousWithinAt_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) (x₀ : X) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuous_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) :
Equicontinuous F :=
equicontinuousAt_empty F
@[simp]
lemma equicontinuousOn_empty [IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → X → α) (S : Set X) :
EquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun x₀ _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_empty F S x₀
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuous_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) :
UniformEquicontinuous F :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
@[simp]
lemma uniformEquicontinuousOn_empty [h : IsEmpty ι] (F : ι → β → α) (S : Set β) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S :=
fun _ _ ↦ eventually_of_forall (fun _ ↦ h.elim)
/-!
### Finite index type
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousAt, ContinuousAt, (nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff,
UniformSpace.ball, @forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ := by
simp [EquicontinuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(nhds_basis_uniformity' (𝓤 α).basis_sets).tendsto_right_iff, UniformSpace.ball,
@forall_swap _ ι]
theorem equicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, Continuous (F i) := by
simp only [Equicontinuous, equicontinuousAt_finite, continuous_iff_continuousAt, @forall_swap ι]
theorem equicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, ContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_finite, ContinuousOn, @forall_swap ι]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous (F i) := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuous, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite [Finite ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := by
simp only [UniformEquicontinuousOn, eventually_all, @forall_swap _ ι]; rfl
/-!
### Index type with a unique element
-/
theorem equicontinuousAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x ↔ ContinuousAt (F default) x :=
equicontinuousAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x ↔ ContinuousWithinAt (F default) S x :=
equicontinuousWithinAt_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (F default) :=
equicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem equicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (F default) S :=
equicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (F default) :=
uniformEquicontinuous_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_unique [Unique ι] {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (F default) S :=
uniformEquicontinuousOn_finite.trans Unique.forall_iff
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` within a set `S`, comparing two variables near `x₀`
instead of comparing only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hx₀ : x₀ ∈ S) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
constructor <;> intro H U hU
· rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hU with ⟨V, hV, hVsymm, hVU⟩
refine ⟨_, H V hV, fun x hx y hy i => hVU (prod_mk_mem_compRel ?_ (hy i))⟩
exact hVsymm.mk_mem_comm.mp (hx i)
· rcases H U hU with ⟨V, hV, hVU⟩
filter_upwards [hV] using fun x hx i => hVU x₀ (mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ hV) x hx i
/-- Reformulation of equicontinuity at `x₀` comparing two variables near `x₀` instead of comparing
only one with `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_pair {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 x₀, ∀ x ∈ V, ∀ y ∈ V, ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
simp_rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_pair (mem_univ x₀),
nhdsWithin_univ]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_pair equicontinuousAt_iff_pair
/-- Uniform equicontinuity implies equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) :
Equicontinuous F := fun x₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhds x₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
#align uniform_equicontinuous.equicontinuous UniformEquicontinuous.equicontinuous
/-- Uniform equicontinuity on a subset implies equicontinuity on that subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.equicontinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) :
EquicontinuousOn F S := fun _ hx₀ U hU ↦
mem_of_superset (ball_mem_nhdsWithin hx₀ (h U hU)) fun _ hx i ↦ hx i
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` is continuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousAt (F i) x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
#align equicontinuous_at.continuous_at EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (i : ι) :
ContinuousWithinAt (F i) S x₀ :=
(UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds _).tendsto_right_iff.2 fun U ⟨hU, _⟩ ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _x hx ↦ hx i
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousAt f x₀ :=
h.continuousAt ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous_at.continuous_at_of_mem Set.EquicontinuousAt.continuousAt_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.continuousWithinAt_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
ContinuousWithinAt f S x₀ :=
h.continuousWithinAt ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of an equicontinuous family is continuous. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.continuous {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (i : ι) :
Continuous (F i) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x => (h x).continuousAt i
#align equicontinuous.continuous Equicontinuous.continuous
/-- Each function of a family equicontinuous on `S` is continuous on `S`. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S)
(i : ι) : ContinuousOn (F i) S :=
fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).continuousWithinAt i
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
{f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : Continuous f :=
h.continuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem Set.Equicontinuous.continuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.continuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) {f : X → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : ContinuousOn f S :=
h.continuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Each function of a uniformly equicontinuous family is uniformly continuous. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F)
(i : ι) : UniformContinuous (F i) := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous
/-- Each function of a family uniformly equicontinuous on `S` is uniformly continuous on `S`. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S) (i : ι) :
UniformContinuousOn (F i) S := fun U hU =>
mem_map.mpr (mem_of_superset (h U hU) fun _ hxy => hxy i)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuous) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) : UniformContinuous f :=
h.uniformContinuous ⟨f, hf⟩
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.uniform_continuous_of_mem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.uniformContinuous_of_mem
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.uniformContinuousOn_of_mem {H : Set <| β → α}
{S : Set β} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) {f : β → α} (hf : f ∈ H) :
UniformContinuousOn f S :=
h.uniformContinuousOn ⟨f, hf⟩
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point. -/
theorem EquicontinuousAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (h : EquicontinuousAt F x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousAt (F ∘ u) x₀ := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align equicontinuous_at.comp EquicontinuousAt.comp
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity at a point within a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousWithinAt.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (F ∘ u) S x₀ :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousAt x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousAt x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous_at.mono Set.EquicontinuousAt.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousWithinAt.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousWithinAt S x₀ :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity. -/
theorem Equicontinuous.comp {F : ι → X → α} (h : Equicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
Equicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun x => (h x).comp u
#align equicontinuous.comp Equicontinuous.comp
/-- Taking sub-families preserves equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem EquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} (h : EquicontinuousOn F S) (u : κ → ι) :
EquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S := fun x hx ↦ (h x hx).comp u
protected theorem Set.Equicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} (h : H.Equicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.Equicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.equicontinuous.mono Set.Equicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.EquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| X → α} {S : Set X}
(h : H.EquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.EquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuous.comp {F : ι → β → α} (h : UniformEquicontinuous F) (u : κ → ι) :
UniformEquicontinuous (F ∘ u) := fun U hU => (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
#align uniform_equicontinuous.comp UniformEquicontinuous.comp
/-- Taking sub-families preserves uniform equicontinuity on a subset. -/
theorem UniformEquicontinuousOn.comp {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (h : UniformEquicontinuousOn F S)
(u : κ → ι) : UniformEquicontinuousOn (F ∘ u) S :=
fun U hU ↦ (h U hU).mono fun _ H k => H (u k)
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} (h : H.UniformEquicontinuous)
(hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuous :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
#align set.uniform_equicontinuous.mono Set.UniformEquicontinuous.mono
protected theorem Set.UniformEquicontinuousOn.mono {H H' : Set <| β → α} {S : Set β}
(h : H.UniformEquicontinuousOn S) (hH : H' ⊆ H) : H'.UniformEquicontinuousOn S :=
h.comp (inclusion hH)
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous at `x₀`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀`. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_range equicontinuousAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous
at `x₀` within `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ EquicontinuousWithinAt ((↑) : range F → X → α) S x₀ := by
simp only [EquicontinuousWithinAt, forall_subtype_range_iff]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Equicontinuous ((↑) : range F → X → α) :=
forall_congr' fun _ => equicontinuousAt_iff_range
#align equicontinuous_iff_range equicontinuous_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is equicontinuous on `S`,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ EquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → X → α) S :=
forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_congr' fun _ ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly equicontinuous,
i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformEquicontinuous ((↑) : range F → β → α) :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
#align uniform_equicontinuous_at_iff_range uniformEquicontinuous_iff_range
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff `range 𝓕` is uniformly
equicontinuous on `S`, i.e the family `(↑) : range F → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S`. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_range {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformEquicontinuousOn ((↑) : range F → β → α) S :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← comp_rangeSplitting F]; exact h.comp _, fun h =>
h.comp (rangeFactorization F)⟩
section
open UniformFun
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous at `x₀` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ContinuousAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align equicontinuous_at_iff_continuous_at equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous at `x₀` within `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is continuous at `x₀` within `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is very useful for
developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S x₀ := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuous_iff_continuous {F : ι → X → α} :
Equicontinuous F ↔ Continuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) := by
simp_rw [Equicontinuous, continuous_iff_continuousAt, equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt]
#align equicontinuous_iff_continuous equicontinuous_iff_continuous
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → X → α` is equicontinuous on `S` iff the function `swap 𝓕 : X → ι → α` is
continuous on `S` *when `ι → α` is equipped with the topology of uniform convergence*. This is
very useful for developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other
purposes. -/
theorem equicontinuousOn_iff_continuousOn {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn F S ↔ ContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : X → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, ContinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt]
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous iff the function `swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is
uniformly continuous *when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*.
This is very useful for developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly
for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous {F : ι → β → α} :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ UniformContinuous (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align uniform_equicontinuous_iff_uniform_continuous uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous
/-- A family `𝓕 : ι → β → α` is uniformly equicontinuous on `S` iff the function
`swap 𝓕 : β → ι → α` is uniformly continuous on `S`
*when `ι → α` is equipped with the uniform structure of uniform convergence*. This is very useful
for developping the equicontinuity API, but it should not be used directly for other purposes. -/
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔ UniformContinuousOn (ofFun ∘ Function.swap F : β → ι →ᵤ α) S := by
rw [UniformContinuousOn, (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} {x₀ : X} : EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S x₀ ↔
∀ k, EquicontinuousWithinAt (uα := u k) F S x₀ := by
simp only [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (uα := _), topologicalSpace]
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, nhds_iInf, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{x₀ : X} :
EquicontinuousAt (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousAt (uα := u k) F x₀ := by
simp only [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (uα := _), equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'} :
Equicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, Equicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [equicontinuous_iff_continuous (uα := _), UniformFun.topologicalSpace]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, toTopologicalSpace_iInf, continuous_iInf_rng]
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → X → α'}
{S : Set X} :
EquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔ ∀ k, EquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [EquicontinuousOn, equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_rng, @forall_swap _ κ]
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'} :
UniformEquicontinuous (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F ↔ ∀ k, UniformEquicontinuous (uα := u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uα := _)]
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, uniformContinuous_iInf_rng]
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_rng {u : κ → UniformSpace α'} {F : ι → β → α'}
{S : Set β} : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := ⨅ k, u k) F S ↔
∀ k, UniformEquicontinuousOn (uα := u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uα := _)]
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [UniformFun.iInf_eq, iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
theorem equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := t k) F S x₀) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S x₀ := by
simp [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold ContinuousWithinAt nhdsWithin at hk ⊢
rw [nhds_iInf]
exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{x₀ : X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousAt (tX := t k) F x₀) :
EquicontinuousAt (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F x₀ := by
rw [← equicontinuousWithinAt_univ (tX := _)] at hk ⊢
exact equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom hk
theorem equicontinuous_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : Equicontinuous (tX := t k) F) :
Equicontinuous (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F :=
fun x ↦ equicontinuousAt_iInf_dom (hk x)
theorem equicontinuousOn_iInf_dom {t : κ → TopologicalSpace X'} {F : ι → X' → α}
{S : Set X'} {k : κ} (hk : EquicontinuousOn (tX := t k) F S) :
EquicontinuousOn (tX := ⨅ k, t k) F S :=
fun x hx ↦ equicontinuousWithinAt_iInf_dom (hk x hx)
theorem uniformEquicontinuous_iInf_dom {u : κ → UniformSpace β'} {F : ι → β' → α}
{k : κ} (hk : UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := u k) F) :
UniformEquicontinuous (uβ := ⨅ k, u k) F := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous (uβ := _)] at hk ⊢
exact uniformContinuous_iInf_dom hk
theorem uniformEquicontinuousOn_iInf_dom {u : κ → UniformSpace β'} {F : ι → β' → α}
{S : Set β'} {k : κ} (hk : UniformEquicontinuousOn (uβ := u k) F S) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn (uβ := ⨅ k, u k) F S := by
simp_rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn (uβ := _)] at hk ⊢
unfold UniformContinuousOn
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact hk.mono_left <| inf_le_inf_right _ <| iInf_le _ k
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_left {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set X}
{F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝 x₀).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x ∈ s k, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _)]
rfl
#align filter.has_basis.equicontinuous_at_iff_left Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_left
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_left {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set X}
{F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝[S] x₀).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x ∈ s k, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ U := by
rw [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds ι α _)]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_right {p : κ → Prop} {s : κ → Set (α × α)}
{F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔ ∀ k, p k → ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s k := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
#align filter.has_basis.equicontinuous_at_iff_right Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff_right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_right {p : κ → Prop}
{s : κ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X} (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔ ∀ k, p k → ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[S] x₀, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s k := by
rw [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff {κ₁ κ₂ : Type*} {p₁ : κ₁ → Prop} {s₁ : κ₁ → Set X}
{p₂ : κ₂ → Prop} {s₂ : κ₂ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → X → α} {x₀ : X} (hX : (𝓝 x₀).HasBasis p₁ s₁)
(hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p₂ s₂) :
EquicontinuousAt F x₀ ↔
∀ k₂, p₂ k₂ → ∃ k₁, p₁ k₁ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁ k₁, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s₂ k₂ := by
rw [equicontinuousAt_iff_continuousAt, ContinuousAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα)]
rfl
#align filter.has_basis.equicontinuous_at_iff Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousAt_iff
theorem Filter.HasBasis.equicontinuousWithinAt_iff {κ₁ κ₂ : Type*} {p₁ : κ₁ → Prop}
{s₁ : κ₁ → Set X} {p₂ : κ₂ → Prop} {s₂ : κ₂ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → X → α} {S : Set X} {x₀ : X}
(hX : (𝓝[S] x₀).HasBasis p₁ s₁) (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p₂ s₂) :
EquicontinuousWithinAt F S x₀ ↔
∀ k₂, p₂ k₂ → ∃ k₁, p₁ k₁ ∧ ∀ x ∈ s₁ k₁, ∀ i, (F i x₀, F i x) ∈ s₂ k₂ := by
rw [equicontinuousWithinAt_iff_continuousWithinAt, ContinuousWithinAt,
hX.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_nhds_of_basis ι α _ hα)]
rfl
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformEquicontinuous_iff_left {p : κ → Prop}
{s : κ → Set (β × β)} {F : ι → β → α} (hβ : (𝓤 β).HasBasis p s) :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s k → ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous, UniformContinuous,
hβ.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α)]
simp only [Prod.forall]
rfl
#align filter.has_basis.uniform_equicontinuous_iff_left Filter.HasBasis.uniformEquicontinuous_iff_left
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_left {p : κ → Prop}
{s : κ → Set (β × β)} {F : ι → β → α} {S : Set β} (hβ : (𝓤 β ⊓ 𝓟 (S ×ˢ S)).HasBasis p s) :
UniformEquicontinuousOn F S ↔
∀ U ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ k, p k ∧ ∀ x y, (x, y) ∈ s k → ∀ i, (F i x, F i y) ∈ U := by
rw [uniformEquicontinuousOn_iff_uniformContinuousOn, UniformContinuousOn,
hβ.tendsto_iff (UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity ι α)]
simp only [Prod.forall]
rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Equicontinuity.lean | 701 | 706 | theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformEquicontinuous_iff_right {p : κ → Prop}
{s : κ → Set (α × α)} {F : ι → β → α} (hα : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) :
UniformEquicontinuous F ↔ ∀ k, p k → ∀ᶠ xy : β × β in 𝓤 β, ∀ i, (F i xy.1, F i xy.2) ∈ s k := by |
rw [uniformEquicontinuous_iff_uniformContinuous, UniformContinuous,
(UniformFun.hasBasis_uniformity_of_basis ι α hα).tendsto_right_iff]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pairwise.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Group
#align_import data.set.pointwise.smul from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5e526d18cea33550268dcbbddcb822d5cde40654"
/-!
# Pointwise operations of sets
This file defines pointwise algebraic operations on sets.
## Main declarations
For sets `s` and `t` and scalar `a`:
* `s • t`: Scalar multiplication, set of all `x • y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s +ᵥ t`: Scalar addition, set of all `x +ᵥ y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `s -ᵥ t`: Scalar subtraction, set of all `x -ᵥ y` where `x ∈ s` and `y ∈ t`.
* `a • s`: Scaling, set of all `a • x` where `x ∈ s`.
* `a +ᵥ s`: Translation, set of all `a +ᵥ x` where `x ∈ s`.
For `α` a semigroup/monoid, `Set α` is a semigroup/monoid.
Appropriate definitions and results are also transported to the additive theory via `to_additive`.
## Implementation notes
* We put all instances in the locale `Pointwise`, so that these instances are not available by
default. Note that we do not mark them as reducible (as argued by note [reducible non-instances])
since we expect the locale to be open whenever the instances are actually used (and making the
instances reducible changes the behavior of `simp`.
-/
open Function MulOpposite
variable {F α β γ : Type*}
namespace Set
open Pointwise
/-! ### Translation/scaling of sets -/
section SMul
/-- The dilation of set `x • s` is defined as `{x • y | y ∈ s}` in locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The translation of set `x +ᵥ s` is defined as `{x +ᵥ y | y ∈ s}` in
locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def smulSet [SMul α β] : SMul α (Set β) :=
⟨fun a ↦ image (a • ·)⟩
#align set.has_smul_set Set.smulSet
#align set.has_vadd_set Set.vaddSet
/-- The pointwise scalar multiplication of sets `s • t` is defined as `{x • y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in
locale `Pointwise`. -/
@[to_additive
"The pointwise scalar addition of sets `s +ᵥ t` is defined as
`{x +ᵥ y | x ∈ s, y ∈ t}` in locale `Pointwise`."]
protected def smul [SMul α β] : SMul (Set α) (Set β) :=
⟨image2 (· • ·)⟩
#align set.has_smul Set.smul
#align set.has_vadd Set.vadd
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.smulSet Set.smul
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.vaddSet Set.vadd
section SMul
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} [SMul α β] {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ u : Set β} {a : α}
{b : β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem image2_smul : image2 SMul.smul s t = s • t :=
rfl
#align set.image2_smul Set.image2_smul
#align set.image2_vadd Set.image2_vadd
@[to_additive vadd_image_prod]
theorem image_smul_prod : (fun x : α × β ↦ x.fst • x.snd) '' s ×ˢ t = s • t :=
image_prod _
#align set.image_smul_prod Set.image_smul_prod
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_smul : b ∈ s • t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x • y = b :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_smul Set.mem_smul
#align set.mem_vadd Set.mem_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_mem_smul : a ∈ s → b ∈ t → a • b ∈ s • t :=
mem_image2_of_mem
#align set.smul_mem_smul Set.smul_mem_smul
#align set.vadd_mem_vadd Set.vadd_mem_vadd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem empty_smul : (∅ : Set α) • t = ∅ :=
image2_empty_left
#align set.empty_smul Set.empty_smul
#align set.empty_vadd Set.empty_vadd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_empty : s • (∅ : Set β) = ∅ :=
image2_empty_right
#align set.smul_empty Set.smul_empty
#align set.vadd_empty Set.vadd_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_eq_empty : s • t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image2_eq_empty_iff
#align set.smul_eq_empty Set.smul_eq_empty
#align set.vadd_eq_empty Set.vadd_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_nonempty : (s • t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image2_nonempty_iff
#align set.smul_nonempty Set.smul_nonempty
#align set.vadd_nonempty Set.vadd_nonempty
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.smul : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s • t).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image2
#align set.nonempty.smul Set.Nonempty.smul
#align set.nonempty.vadd Set.Nonempty.vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_smul_left : (s • t).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_left
#align set.nonempty.of_smul_left Set.Nonempty.of_smul_left
#align set.nonempty.of_vadd_left Set.Nonempty.of_vadd_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.of_smul_right : (s • t).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_right
#align set.nonempty.of_smul_right Set.Nonempty.of_smul_right
#align set.nonempty.of_vadd_right Set.Nonempty.of_vadd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp low+1)]
theorem smul_singleton : s • ({b} : Set β) = (· • b) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.smul_singleton Set.smul_singleton
#align set.vadd_singleton Set.vadd_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := simp low+1)]
theorem singleton_smul : ({a} : Set α) • t = a • t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_smul Set.singleton_smul
#align set.singleton_vadd Set.singleton_vadd
@[to_additive (attr := simp high)]
theorem singleton_smul_singleton : ({a} : Set α) • ({b} : Set β) = {a • b} :=
image2_singleton
#align set.singleton_smul_singleton Set.singleton_smul_singleton
#align set.singleton_vadd_singleton Set.singleton_vadd_singleton
@[to_additive (attr := mono)]
theorem smul_subset_smul : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ • t₁ ⊆ s₂ • t₂ :=
image2_subset
#align set.smul_subset_smul Set.smul_subset_smul
#align set.vadd_subset_vadd Set.vadd_subset_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_subset_smul_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s • t₁ ⊆ s • t₂ :=
image2_subset_left
#align set.smul_subset_smul_left Set.smul_subset_smul_left
#align set.vadd_subset_vadd_left Set.vadd_subset_vadd_left
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_subset_smul_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ • t ⊆ s₂ • t :=
image2_subset_right
#align set.smul_subset_smul_right Set.smul_subset_smul_right
#align set.vadd_subset_vadd_right Set.vadd_subset_vadd_right
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_subset_iff : s • t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a • b ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.smul_subset_iff Set.smul_subset_iff
#align set.vadd_subset_iff Set.vadd_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem union_smul : (s₁ ∪ s₂) • t = s₁ • t ∪ s₂ • t :=
image2_union_left
#align set.union_smul Set.union_smul
#align set.union_vadd Set.union_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_union : s • (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s • t₁ ∪ s • t₂ :=
image2_union_right
#align set.smul_union Set.smul_union
#align set.vadd_union Set.vadd_union
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_smul_subset : (s₁ ∩ s₂) • t ⊆ s₁ • t ∩ s₂ • t :=
image2_inter_subset_left
#align set.inter_smul_subset Set.inter_smul_subset
#align set.inter_vadd_subset Set.inter_vadd_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_inter_subset : s • (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s • t₁ ∩ s • t₂ :=
image2_inter_subset_right
#align set.smul_inter_subset Set.smul_inter_subset
#align set.vadd_inter_subset Set.vadd_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem inter_smul_union_subset_union : (s₁ ∩ s₂) • (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ • t₁ ∪ s₂ • t₂ :=
image2_inter_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_smul_union_subset_union Set.inter_smul_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_vadd_union_subset_union Set.inter_vadd_union_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem union_smul_inter_subset_union : (s₁ ∪ s₂) • (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ s₁ • t₁ ∪ s₂ • t₂ :=
image2_union_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_smul_inter_subset_union Set.union_smul_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_vadd_inter_subset_union Set.union_vadd_inter_subset_union
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_smul_left_image : ⋃ a ∈ s, a • t = s • t :=
iUnion_image_left _
#align set.Union_smul_left_image Set.iUnion_smul_left_image
#align set.Union_vadd_left_image Set.iUnion_vadd_left_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_smul_right_image : ⋃ a ∈ t, (· • a) '' s = s • t :=
iUnion_image_right _
#align set.Union_smul_right_image Set.iUnion_smul_right_image
#align set.Union_vadd_right_image Set.iUnion_vadd_right_image
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_smul (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) : (⋃ i, s i) • t = ⋃ i, s i • t :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
#align set.Union_smul Set.iUnion_smul
#align set.Union_vadd Set.iUnion_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) : (s • ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s • t i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
#align set.smul_Union Set.smul_iUnion
#align set.vadd_Union Set.vadd_iUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion₂_smul (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) • t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j • t :=
image2_iUnion₂_left _ _ _
#align set.Union₂_smul Set.iUnion₂_smul
#align set.Union₂_vadd Set.iUnion₂_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_iUnion₂ (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(s • ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s • t i j :=
image2_iUnion₂_right _ _ _
#align set.smul_Union₂ Set.smul_iUnion₂
#align set.vadd_Union₂ Set.vadd_iUnion₂
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter_smul_subset (s : ι → Set α) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) • t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i • t :=
image2_iInter_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter_smul_subset Set.iInter_smul_subset
#align set.Inter_vadd_subset Set.iInter_vadd_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_iInter_subset (s : Set α) (t : ι → Set β) : (s • ⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, s • t i :=
image2_iInter_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.smul_Inter_subset Set.smul_iInter_subset
#align set.vadd_Inter_subset Set.vadd_iInter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem iInter₂_smul_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) (t : Set β) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) • t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j • t :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter₂_smul_subset Set.iInter₂_smul_subset
#align set.Inter₂_vadd_subset Set.iInter₂_vadd_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_iInter₂_subset (s : Set α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(s • ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s • t i j :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.smul_Inter₂_subset Set.smul_iInter₂_subset
#align set.vadd_Inter₂_subset Set.vadd_iInter₂_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_subset_smul {s : Set α} : a ∈ s → a • t ⊆ s • t :=
image_subset_image2_right
#align set.smul_set_subset_smul Set.smul_set_subset_smul
#align set.vadd_set_subset_vadd Set.vadd_set_subset_vadd
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem iUnion_smul_set (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, a • t = s • t :=
iUnion_image_left _
#align set.bUnion_smul_set Set.iUnion_smul_set
#align set.bUnion_vadd_set Set.iUnion_vadd_set
end SMul
section SMulSet
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} [SMul α β] {s t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β} {x y : β}
@[to_additive]
theorem image_smul : (fun x ↦ a • x) '' t = a • t :=
rfl
#align set.image_smul Set.image_smul
#align set.image_vadd Set.image_vadd
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [simp] Set.image_smul Set.image_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_smul_set : x ∈ a • t ↔ ∃ y, y ∈ t ∧ a • y = x :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_smul_set Set.mem_smul_set
#align set.mem_vadd_set Set.mem_vadd_set
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_mem_smul_set : b ∈ s → a • b ∈ a • s :=
mem_image_of_mem _
#align set.smul_mem_smul_set Set.smul_mem_smul_set
#align set.vadd_mem_vadd_set Set.vadd_mem_vadd_set
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_set_empty : a • (∅ : Set β) = ∅ :=
image_empty _
#align set.smul_set_empty Set.smul_set_empty
#align set.vadd_set_empty Set.vadd_set_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_set_eq_empty : a • s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
image_eq_empty
#align set.smul_set_eq_empty Set.smul_set_eq_empty
#align set.vadd_set_eq_empty Set.vadd_set_eq_empty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_set_nonempty : (a • s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
image_nonempty
#align set.smul_set_nonempty Set.smul_set_nonempty
#align set.vadd_set_nonempty Set.vadd_set_nonempty
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_set_singleton : a • ({b} : Set β) = {a • b} :=
image_singleton
#align set.smul_set_singleton Set.smul_set_singleton
#align set.vadd_set_singleton Set.vadd_set_singleton
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_mono : s ⊆ t → a • s ⊆ a • t :=
image_subset _
#align set.smul_set_mono Set.smul_set_mono
#align set.vadd_set_mono Set.vadd_set_mono
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_subset_iff : a • s ⊆ t ↔ ∀ ⦃b⦄, b ∈ s → a • b ∈ t :=
image_subset_iff
#align set.smul_set_subset_iff Set.smul_set_subset_iff
#align set.vadd_set_subset_iff Set.vadd_set_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_union : a • (t₁ ∪ t₂) = a • t₁ ∪ a • t₂ :=
image_union _ _ _
#align set.smul_set_union Set.smul_set_union
#align set.vadd_set_union Set.vadd_set_union
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_inter_subset : a • (t₁ ∩ t₂) ⊆ a • t₁ ∩ a • t₂ :=
image_inter_subset _ _ _
#align set.smul_set_inter_subset Set.smul_set_inter_subset
#align set.vadd_set_inter_subset Set.vadd_set_inter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_iUnion (a : α) (s : ι → Set β) : (a • ⋃ i, s i) = ⋃ i, a • s i :=
image_iUnion
#align set.smul_set_Union Set.smul_set_iUnion
#align set.vadd_set_Union Set.vadd_set_iUnion
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_iUnion₂ (a : α) (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(a • ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), a • s i j :=
image_iUnion₂ _ _
#align set.smul_set_Union₂ Set.smul_set_iUnion₂
#align set.vadd_set_Union₂ Set.vadd_set_iUnion₂
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_iInter_subset (a : α) (t : ι → Set β) : (a • ⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, a • t i :=
image_iInter_subset _ _
#align set.smul_set_Inter_subset Set.smul_set_iInter_subset
#align set.vadd_set_Inter_subset Set.vadd_set_iInter_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_iInter₂_subset (a : α) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(a • ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), a • t i j :=
image_iInter₂_subset _ _
#align set.smul_set_Inter₂_subset Set.smul_set_iInter₂_subset
#align set.vadd_set_Inter₂_subset Set.vadd_set_iInter₂_subset
@[to_additive]
theorem Nonempty.smul_set : s.Nonempty → (a • s).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image _
#align set.nonempty.smul_set Set.Nonempty.smul_set
#align set.nonempty.vadd_set Set.Nonempty.vadd_set
end SMulSet
section Mul
variable [Mul α] {s t u : Set α} {a : α}
@[to_additive]
theorem op_smul_set_subset_mul : a ∈ t → op a • s ⊆ s * t :=
image_subset_image2_left
#align set.op_smul_set_subset_mul Set.op_smul_set_subset_mul
#align set.op_vadd_set_subset_add Set.op_vadd_set_subset_add
@[to_additive]
theorem image_op_smul : (op '' s) • t = t * s := by
rw [← image2_smul, ← image2_mul, image2_image_left, image2_swap]
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem iUnion_op_smul_set (s t : Set α) : ⋃ a ∈ t, MulOpposite.op a • s = s * t :=
iUnion_image_right _
#align set.bUnion_op_smul_set Set.iUnion_op_smul_set
#align set.bUnion_op_vadd_set Set.iUnion_op_vadd_set
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_iff_left : s * t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a • t ⊆ u :=
image2_subset_iff_left
#align set.mul_subset_iff_left Set.mul_subset_iff_left
#align set.add_subset_iff_left Set.add_subset_iff_left
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_subset_iff_right : s * t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ b ∈ t, op b • s ⊆ u :=
image2_subset_iff_right
#align set.mul_subset_iff_right Set.mul_subset_iff_right
#align set.add_subset_iff_right Set.add_subset_iff_right
end Mul
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
@[to_additive]
theorem range_smul_range {ι κ : Type*} [SMul α β] (b : ι → α) (c : κ → β) :
range b • range c = range fun p : ι × κ ↦ b p.1 • c p.2 :=
image2_range ..
#align set.range_smul_range Set.range_smul_range
#align set.range_vadd_range Set.range_vadd_range
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_range [SMul α β] {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → β} :
a • range f = range fun i ↦ a • f i :=
(range_comp _ _).symm
#align set.smul_set_range Set.smul_set_range
#align set.vadd_set_range Set.vadd_set_range
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_set [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass α β (Set γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ ↦ Commute.set_image <| smul_comm _ _⟩
#align set.smul_comm_class_set Set.smulCommClass_set
#align set.vadd_comm_class_set Set.vaddCommClass_set
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_set' [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass α (Set β) (Set γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ image_image2_distrib_right <| smul_comm _⟩
#align set.smul_comm_class_set' Set.smulCommClass_set'
#align set.vadd_comm_class_set' Set.vaddCommClass_set'
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass_set'' [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass (Set α) β (Set γ) :=
haveI := SMulCommClass.symm α β γ
SMulCommClass.symm _ _ _
#align set.smul_comm_class_set'' Set.smulCommClass_set''
#align set.vadd_comm_class_set'' Set.vaddCommClass_set''
@[to_additive]
instance smulCommClass [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [SMulCommClass α β γ] :
SMulCommClass (Set α) (Set β) (Set γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ image2_left_comm smul_comm⟩
#align set.smul_comm_class Set.smulCommClass
#align set.vadd_comm_class Set.vaddCommClass
@[to_additive vaddAssocClass]
instance isScalarTower [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower α β (Set γ) where
smul_assoc a b T := by simp only [← image_smul, image_image, smul_assoc]
#align set.is_scalar_tower Set.isScalarTower
#align set.vadd_assoc_class Set.vaddAssocClass
@[to_additive vaddAssocClass']
instance isScalarTower' [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower α (Set β) (Set γ) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ ↦ image2_image_left_comm <| smul_assoc _⟩
#align set.is_scalar_tower' Set.isScalarTower'
#align set.vadd_assoc_class' Set.vaddAssocClass'
@[to_additive vaddAssocClass'']
instance isScalarTower'' [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] [SMul β γ] [IsScalarTower α β γ] :
IsScalarTower (Set α) (Set β) (Set γ) where
smul_assoc _ _ _ := image2_assoc smul_assoc
#align set.is_scalar_tower'' Set.isScalarTower''
#align set.vadd_assoc_class'' Set.vaddAssocClass''
@[to_additive]
instance isCentralScalar [SMul α β] [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ β] [IsCentralScalar α β] :
IsCentralScalar α (Set β) :=
⟨fun _ S ↦ (congr_arg fun f ↦ f '' S) <| funext fun _ ↦ op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
#align set.is_central_scalar Set.isCentralScalar
#align set.is_central_vadd Set.isCentralVAdd
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid `α` on a type `β` gives a multiplicative action of `Set α`
on `Set β`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive action of an additive monoid `α` on a type `β` gives an additive action of
`Set α` on `Set β`"]
protected def mulAction [Monoid α] [MulAction α β] : MulAction (Set α) (Set β) where
mul_smul _ _ _ := image2_assoc mul_smul
one_smul s := image2_singleton_left.trans <| by simp_rw [one_smul, image_id']
#align set.mul_action Set.mulAction
#align set.add_action Set.addAction
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid on a type `β` gives a multiplicative action on `Set β`. -/
@[to_additive
"An additive action of an additive monoid on a type `β` gives an additive action on `Set β`."]
protected def mulActionSet [Monoid α] [MulAction α β] : MulAction α (Set β) where
mul_smul _ _ _ := by simp only [← image_smul, image_image, ← mul_smul]
one_smul _ := by simp only [← image_smul, one_smul, image_id']
#align set.mul_action_set Set.mulActionSet
#align set.add_action_set Set.addActionSet
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.mulActionSet Set.addActionSet Set.mulAction Set.addAction
/-- If scalar multiplication by elements of `α` sends `(0 : β)` to zero,
then the same is true for `(0 : Set β)`. -/
protected def smulZeroClassSet [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β] :
SMulZeroClass α (Set β) where
smul_zero _ := image_singleton.trans <| by rw [smul_zero, singleton_zero]
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.smulZeroClassSet
/-- If the scalar multiplication `(· • ·) : α → β → β` is distributive,
then so is `(· • ·) : α → Set β → Set β`. -/
protected def distribSMulSet [AddZeroClass β] [DistribSMul α β] :
DistribSMul α (Set β) where
smul_add _ _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| smul_add _
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.distribSMulSet
/-- A distributive multiplicative action of a monoid on an additive monoid `β` gives a distributive
multiplicative action on `Set β`. -/
protected def distribMulActionSet [Monoid α] [AddMonoid β] [DistribMulAction α β] :
DistribMulAction α (Set β) where
smul_add := smul_add
smul_zero := smul_zero
#align set.distrib_mul_action_set Set.distribMulActionSet
/-- A multiplicative action of a monoid on a monoid `β` gives a multiplicative action on `Set β`. -/
protected def mulDistribMulActionSet [Monoid α] [Monoid β] [MulDistribMulAction α β] :
MulDistribMulAction α (Set β) where
smul_mul _ _ _ := image_image2_distrib <| smul_mul' _
smul_one _ := image_singleton.trans <| by rw [smul_one, singleton_one]
#align set.mul_distrib_mul_action_set Set.mulDistribMulActionSet
scoped[Pointwise] attribute [instance] Set.distribMulActionSet Set.mulDistribMulActionSet
instance [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMul α β] [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors (Set α) (Set β) :=
⟨fun {s t} h ↦ by
by_contra! H
have hst : (s • t).Nonempty := h.symm.subst zero_nonempty
rw [Ne, ← hst.of_smul_left.subset_zero_iff, Ne,
← hst.of_smul_right.subset_zero_iff] at H
simp only [not_subset, mem_zero] at H
obtain ⟨⟨a, hs, ha⟩, b, ht, hb⟩ := H
exact (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| h.subset <| smul_mem_smul hs ht).elim ha hb⟩
instance noZeroSMulDivisors_set [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMul α β] [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors α (Set β) :=
⟨fun {a s} h ↦ by
by_contra! H
have hst : (a • s).Nonempty := h.symm.subst zero_nonempty
rw [Ne, Ne, ← hst.of_image.subset_zero_iff, not_subset] at H
obtain ⟨ha, b, ht, hb⟩ := H
exact (eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero <| h.subset <| smul_mem_smul_set ht).elim ha hb⟩
#align set.no_zero_smul_divisors_set Set.noZeroSMulDivisors_set
instance [Zero α] [Mul α] [NoZeroDivisors α] : NoZeroDivisors (Set α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h⟩
end SMul
section VSub
variable {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*} [VSub α β] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {u : Set α} {a : α}
{b c : β}
instance vsub : VSub (Set α) (Set β) :=
⟨image2 (· -ᵥ ·)⟩
#align set.has_vsub Set.vsub
@[simp]
theorem image2_vsub : (image2 VSub.vsub s t : Set α) = s -ᵥ t :=
rfl
#align set.image2_vsub Set.image2_vsub
theorem image_vsub_prod : (fun x : β × β ↦ x.fst -ᵥ x.snd) '' s ×ˢ t = s -ᵥ t :=
image_prod _
#align set.image_vsub_prod Set.image_vsub_prod
theorem mem_vsub : a ∈ s -ᵥ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x -ᵥ y = a :=
Iff.rfl
#align set.mem_vsub Set.mem_vsub
theorem vsub_mem_vsub (hb : b ∈ s) (hc : c ∈ t) : b -ᵥ c ∈ s -ᵥ t :=
mem_image2_of_mem hb hc
#align set.vsub_mem_vsub Set.vsub_mem_vsub
@[simp]
theorem empty_vsub (t : Set β) : ∅ -ᵥ t = ∅ :=
image2_empty_left
#align set.empty_vsub Set.empty_vsub
@[simp]
theorem vsub_empty (s : Set β) : s -ᵥ ∅ = ∅ :=
image2_empty_right
#align set.vsub_empty Set.vsub_empty
@[simp]
theorem vsub_eq_empty : s -ᵥ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ t = ∅ :=
image2_eq_empty_iff
#align set.vsub_eq_empty Set.vsub_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem vsub_nonempty : (s -ᵥ t : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ t.Nonempty :=
image2_nonempty_iff
#align set.vsub_nonempty Set.vsub_nonempty
theorem Nonempty.vsub : s.Nonempty → t.Nonempty → (s -ᵥ t : Set α).Nonempty :=
Nonempty.image2
#align set.nonempty.vsub Set.Nonempty.vsub
theorem Nonempty.of_vsub_left : (s -ᵥ t : Set α).Nonempty → s.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_left
#align set.nonempty.of_vsub_left Set.Nonempty.of_vsub_left
theorem Nonempty.of_vsub_right : (s -ᵥ t : Set α).Nonempty → t.Nonempty :=
Nonempty.of_image2_right
#align set.nonempty.of_vsub_right Set.Nonempty.of_vsub_right
@[simp low+1]
theorem vsub_singleton (s : Set β) (b : β) : s -ᵥ {b} = (· -ᵥ b) '' s :=
image2_singleton_right
#align set.vsub_singleton Set.vsub_singleton
@[simp low+1]
theorem singleton_vsub (t : Set β) (b : β) : {b} -ᵥ t = (b -ᵥ ·) '' t :=
image2_singleton_left
#align set.singleton_vsub Set.singleton_vsub
@[simp high]
theorem singleton_vsub_singleton : ({b} : Set β) -ᵥ {c} = {b -ᵥ c} :=
image2_singleton
#align set.singleton_vsub_singleton Set.singleton_vsub_singleton
@[mono]
theorem vsub_subset_vsub : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s₁ -ᵥ t₁ ⊆ s₂ -ᵥ t₂ :=
image2_subset
#align set.vsub_subset_vsub Set.vsub_subset_vsub
theorem vsub_subset_vsub_left : t₁ ⊆ t₂ → s -ᵥ t₁ ⊆ s -ᵥ t₂ :=
image2_subset_left
#align set.vsub_subset_vsub_left Set.vsub_subset_vsub_left
theorem vsub_subset_vsub_right : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ -ᵥ t ⊆ s₂ -ᵥ t :=
image2_subset_right
#align set.vsub_subset_vsub_right Set.vsub_subset_vsub_right
theorem vsub_subset_iff : s -ᵥ t ⊆ u ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x -ᵥ y ∈ u :=
image2_subset_iff
#align set.vsub_subset_iff Set.vsub_subset_iff
theorem vsub_self_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : s -ᵥ s ⊆ t -ᵥ t :=
vsub_subset_vsub h h
#align set.vsub_self_mono Set.vsub_self_mono
theorem union_vsub : s₁ ∪ s₂ -ᵥ t = s₁ -ᵥ t ∪ (s₂ -ᵥ t) :=
image2_union_left
#align set.union_vsub Set.union_vsub
theorem vsub_union : s -ᵥ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s -ᵥ t₁ ∪ (s -ᵥ t₂) :=
image2_union_right
#align set.vsub_union Set.vsub_union
theorem inter_vsub_subset : s₁ ∩ s₂ -ᵥ t ⊆ (s₁ -ᵥ t) ∩ (s₂ -ᵥ t) :=
image2_inter_subset_left
#align set.inter_vsub_subset Set.inter_vsub_subset
theorem vsub_inter_subset : s -ᵥ t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ (s -ᵥ t₁) ∩ (s -ᵥ t₂) :=
image2_inter_subset_right
#align set.vsub_inter_subset Set.vsub_inter_subset
theorem inter_vsub_union_subset_union : s₁ ∩ s₂ -ᵥ (t₁ ∪ t₂) ⊆ s₁ -ᵥ t₁ ∪ (s₂ -ᵥ t₂) :=
image2_inter_union_subset_union
#align set.inter_vsub_union_subset_union Set.inter_vsub_union_subset_union
theorem union_vsub_inter_subset_union : s₁ ∪ s₂ -ᵥ t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s₁ -ᵥ t₁ ∪ (s₂ -ᵥ t₂) :=
image2_union_inter_subset_union
#align set.union_vsub_inter_subset_union Set.union_vsub_inter_subset_union
theorem iUnion_vsub_left_image : ⋃ a ∈ s, (a -ᵥ ·) '' t = s -ᵥ t :=
iUnion_image_left _
#align set.Union_vsub_left_image Set.iUnion_vsub_left_image
theorem iUnion_vsub_right_image : ⋃ a ∈ t, (· -ᵥ a) '' s = s -ᵥ t :=
iUnion_image_right _
#align set.Union_vsub_right_image Set.iUnion_vsub_right_image
theorem iUnion_vsub (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋃ i, s i) -ᵥ t = ⋃ i, s i -ᵥ t :=
image2_iUnion_left _ _ _
#align set.Union_vsub Set.iUnion_vsub
theorem vsub_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s -ᵥ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s -ᵥ t i :=
image2_iUnion_right _ _ _
#align set.vsub_Union Set.vsub_iUnion
theorem iUnion₂_vsub (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) (t : Set β) :
(⋃ (i) (j), s i j) -ᵥ t = ⋃ (i) (j), s i j -ᵥ t :=
image2_iUnion₂_left _ _ _
#align set.Union₂_vsub Set.iUnion₂_vsub
theorem vsub_iUnion₂ (s : Set β) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(s -ᵥ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j) = ⋃ (i) (j), s -ᵥ t i j :=
image2_iUnion₂_right _ _ _
#align set.vsub_Union₂ Set.vsub_iUnion₂
theorem iInter_vsub_subset (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) -ᵥ t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i -ᵥ t :=
image2_iInter_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter_vsub_subset Set.iInter_vsub_subset
theorem vsub_iInter_subset (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s -ᵥ ⋂ i, t i) ⊆ ⋂ i, s -ᵥ t i :=
image2_iInter_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.vsub_Inter_subset Set.vsub_iInter_subset
theorem iInter₂_vsub_subset (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) (t : Set β) :
(⋂ (i) (j), s i j) -ᵥ t ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j -ᵥ t :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_left _ _ _
#align set.Inter₂_vsub_subset Set.iInter₂_vsub_subset
theorem vsub_iInter₂_subset (s : Set β) (t : ∀ i, κ i → Set β) :
(s -ᵥ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), s -ᵥ t i j :=
image2_iInter₂_subset_right _ _ _
#align set.vsub_Inter₂_subset Set.vsub_iInter₂_subset
end VSub
open Pointwise
@[to_additive]
theorem image_smul_comm [SMul α β] [SMul α γ] (f : β → γ) (a : α) (s : Set β) :
(∀ b, f (a • b) = a • f b) → f '' (a • s) = a • f '' s :=
image_comm
#align set.image_smul_comm Set.image_smul_comm
#align set.image_vadd_comm Set.image_vadd_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem image_smul_distrib [MulOneClass α] [MulOneClass β] [FunLike F α β] [MonoidHomClass F α β]
(f : F) (a : α) (s : Set α) :
f '' (a • s) = f a • f '' s :=
image_comm <| map_mul _ _
#align set.image_smul_distrib Set.image_smul_distrib
#align set.image_vadd_distrib Set.image_vadd_distrib
section SMul
variable [SMul αᵐᵒᵖ β] [SMul β γ] [SMul α γ]
-- TODO: replace hypothesis and conclusion with a typeclass
@[to_additive]
theorem op_smul_set_smul_eq_smul_smul_set (a : α) (s : Set β) (t : Set γ)
(h : ∀ (a : α) (b : β) (c : γ), (op a • b) • c = b • a • c) : (op a • s) • t = s • a • t := by
ext
simp [mem_smul, mem_smul_set, h]
#align set.op_smul_set_smul_eq_smul_smul_set Set.op_smul_set_smul_eq_smul_smul_set
#align set.op_vadd_set_vadd_eq_vadd_vadd_set Set.op_vadd_set_vadd_eq_vadd_vadd_set
end SMul
section SMulZeroClass
variable [Zero β] [SMulZeroClass α β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {a : α}
theorem smul_zero_subset (s : Set α) : s • (0 : Set β) ⊆ 0 := by simp [subset_def, mem_smul]
#align set.smul_zero_subset Set.smul_zero_subset
theorem Nonempty.smul_zero (hs : s.Nonempty) : s • (0 : Set β) = 0 :=
s.smul_zero_subset.antisymm <| by simpa [mem_smul] using hs
#align set.nonempty.smul_zero Set.Nonempty.smul_zero
theorem zero_mem_smul_set (h : (0 : β) ∈ t) : (0 : β) ∈ a • t := ⟨0, h, smul_zero _⟩
#align set.zero_mem_smul_set Set.zero_mem_smul_set
variable [Zero α] [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β]
theorem zero_mem_smul_set_iff (ha : a ≠ 0) : (0 : β) ∈ a • t ↔ (0 : β) ∈ t := by
refine ⟨?_, zero_mem_smul_set⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, h⟩
rwa [(eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h).resolve_left ha] at hb
#align set.zero_mem_smul_set_iff Set.zero_mem_smul_set_iff
end SMulZeroClass
section SMulWithZero
variable [Zero α] [Zero β] [SMulWithZero α β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β}
/-!
Note that we have neither `SMulWithZero α (Set β)` nor `SMulWithZero (Set α) (Set β)`
because `0 * ∅ ≠ 0`.
-/
theorem zero_smul_subset (t : Set β) : (0 : Set α) • t ⊆ 0 := by simp [subset_def, mem_smul]
#align set.zero_smul_subset Set.zero_smul_subset
theorem Nonempty.zero_smul (ht : t.Nonempty) : (0 : Set α) • t = 0 :=
t.zero_smul_subset.antisymm <| by simpa [mem_smul] using ht
#align set.nonempty.zero_smul Set.Nonempty.zero_smul
/-- A nonempty set is scaled by zero to the singleton set containing 0. -/
@[simp] theorem zero_smul_set {s : Set β} (h : s.Nonempty) : (0 : α) • s = (0 : Set β) := by
simp only [← image_smul, image_eta, zero_smul, h.image_const, singleton_zero]
#align set.zero_smul_set Set.zero_smul_set
theorem zero_smul_set_subset (s : Set β) : (0 : α) • s ⊆ 0 :=
image_subset_iff.2 fun x _ ↦ zero_smul α x
#align set.zero_smul_set_subset Set.zero_smul_set_subset
theorem subsingleton_zero_smul_set (s : Set β) : ((0 : α) • s).Subsingleton :=
subsingleton_singleton.anti <| zero_smul_set_subset s
#align set.subsingleton_zero_smul_set Set.subsingleton_zero_smul_set
variable [NoZeroSMulDivisors α β] {a : α}
theorem zero_mem_smul_iff :
(0 : β) ∈ s • t ↔ (0 : α) ∈ s ∧ t.Nonempty ∨ (0 : β) ∈ t ∧ s.Nonempty := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, ha, b, hb, h⟩
obtain rfl | rfl := eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h
· exact Or.inl ⟨ha, b, hb⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨hb, a, ha⟩
· rintro (⟨hs, b, hb⟩ | ⟨ht, a, ha⟩)
· exact ⟨0, hs, b, hb, zero_smul _ _⟩
· exact ⟨a, ha, 0, ht, smul_zero _⟩
#align set.zero_mem_smul_iff Set.zero_mem_smul_iff
end SMulWithZero
section Semigroup
variable [Semigroup α]
@[to_additive]
theorem op_smul_set_mul_eq_mul_smul_set (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : Set α) :
op a • s * t = s * a • t :=
op_smul_set_smul_eq_smul_smul_set _ _ _ fun _ _ _ => mul_assoc _ _ _
#align set.op_smul_set_mul_eq_mul_smul_set Set.op_smul_set_mul_eq_mul_smul_set
#align set.op_vadd_set_add_eq_add_vadd_set Set.op_vadd_set_add_eq_add_vadd_set
end Semigroup
section IsLeftCancelMul
variable [Mul α] [IsLeftCancelMul α] {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_smul_iff :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (· • t) ↔ (s ×ˢ t).InjOn fun p ↦ p.1 * p.2 :=
pairwiseDisjoint_image_right_iff fun _ _ ↦ mul_right_injective _
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_smul_iff Set.pairwiseDisjoint_smul_iff
#align set.pairwise_disjoint_vadd_iff Set.pairwiseDisjoint_vadd_iff
end IsLeftCancelMul
section Group
variable [Group α] [MulAction α β] {s t A B : Set β} {a : α} {x : β}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_mem_smul_set_iff : a • x ∈ a • s ↔ x ∈ s :=
(MulAction.injective _).mem_set_image
#align set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff
#align set.vadd_mem_vadd_set_iff Set.vadd_mem_vadd_set_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem : x ∈ a • A ↔ a⁻¹ • x ∈ A :=
show x ∈ MulAction.toPerm a '' A ↔ _ from mem_image_equiv
#align set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem
#align set.mem_vadd_set_iff_neg_vadd_mem Set.mem_vadd_set_iff_neg_vadd_mem
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_inv_smul_set_iff : x ∈ a⁻¹ • A ↔ a • x ∈ A := by
simp only [← image_smul, mem_image, inv_smul_eq_iff, exists_eq_right]
#align set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff
#align set.mem_neg_vadd_set_iff Set.mem_neg_vadd_set_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem preimage_smul (a : α) (t : Set β) : (fun x ↦ a • x) ⁻¹' t = a⁻¹ • t :=
((MulAction.toPerm a).symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
#align set.preimage_smul Set.preimage_smul
#align set.preimage_vadd Set.preimage_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem preimage_smul_inv (a : α) (t : Set β) : (fun x ↦ a⁻¹ • x) ⁻¹' t = a • t :=
preimage_smul (toUnits a)⁻¹ t
#align set.preimage_smul_inv Set.preimage_smul_inv
#align set.preimage_vadd_neg Set.preimage_vadd_neg
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff : a • A ⊆ a • B ↔ A ⊆ B :=
image_subset_image_iff <| MulAction.injective _
#align set.set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff Set.set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff
#align set.set_vadd_subset_set_vadd_iff Set.set_vadd_subset_set_vadd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem set_smul_subset_iff : a • A ⊆ B ↔ A ⊆ a⁻¹ • B :=
image_subset_iff.trans <|
iff_of_eq <| congr_arg _ <| preimage_equiv_eq_image_symm _ <| MulAction.toPerm _
#align set.set_smul_subset_iff Set.set_smul_subset_iff
#align set.set_vadd_subset_iff Set.set_vadd_subset_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem subset_set_smul_iff : A ⊆ a • B ↔ a⁻¹ • A ⊆ B :=
Iff.symm <|
image_subset_iff.trans <|
Iff.symm <| iff_of_eq <| congr_arg _ <| image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm _ <| MulAction.toPerm _
#align set.subset_set_smul_iff Set.subset_set_smul_iff
#align set.subset_set_vadd_iff Set.subset_set_vadd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_inter : a • (s ∩ t) = a • s ∩ a • t :=
image_inter <| MulAction.injective a
#align set.smul_set_inter Set.smul_set_inter
#align set.vadd_set_inter Set.vadd_set_inter
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_iInter {ι : Type*}
(a : α) (t : ι → Set β) : (a • ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, a • t i :=
image_iInter (MulAction.bijective a) t
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_sdiff : a • (s \ t) = a • s \ a • t :=
image_diff (MulAction.injective a) _ _
#align set.smul_set_sdiff Set.smul_set_sdiff
#align set.vadd_set_sdiff Set.vadd_set_sdiff
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_symmDiff : a • s ∆ t = (a • s) ∆ (a • t) :=
image_symmDiff (MulAction.injective a) _ _
#align set.smul_set_symm_diff Set.smul_set_symmDiff
#align set.vadd_set_symm_diff Set.vadd_set_symmDiff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_set_univ : a • (univ : Set β) = univ :=
image_univ_of_surjective <| MulAction.surjective a
#align set.smul_set_univ Set.smul_set_univ
#align set.vadd_set_univ Set.vadd_set_univ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem smul_univ {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : s • (univ : Set β) = univ :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
eq_univ_of_forall fun b ↦ ⟨a, ha, a⁻¹ • b, trivial, smul_inv_smul _ _⟩
#align set.smul_univ Set.smul_univ
#align set.vadd_univ Set.vadd_univ
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_set_compl : a • sᶜ = (a • s)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [Set.compl_eq_univ_diff, smul_set_sdiff, smul_set_univ]
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_inter_ne_empty_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
x • s ∩ t ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃ a b, (a ∈ t ∧ b ∈ s) ∧ a * b⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, ha⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := mem_smul_set.mp h
exact ⟨x • b, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨a, mem_inter (mem_smul_set.mpr ⟨b, hb, by simp⟩) ha⟩
#align set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff Set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff
#align set.vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff Set.vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem smul_inter_ne_empty_iff' {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
x • s ∩ t ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃ a b, (a ∈ t ∧ b ∈ s) ∧ a / b = x := by
simp_rw [smul_inter_ne_empty_iff, div_eq_mul_inv]
#align set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff' Set.smul_inter_ne_empty_iff'
#align set.vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff' Set.vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff'
@[to_additive]
theorem op_smul_inter_ne_empty_iff {s t : Set α} {x : αᵐᵒᵖ} :
x • s ∩ t ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃ a b, (a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t) ∧ a⁻¹ * b = MulOpposite.unop x := by
rw [← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, h, ha⟩
obtain ⟨b, hb, rfl⟩ := mem_smul_set.mp h
exact ⟨b, x • b, ⟨hb, ha⟩, by simp⟩
· rintro ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩, H⟩
have : MulOpposite.op (a⁻¹ * b) = x := congr_arg MulOpposite.op H
exact ⟨b, mem_inter (mem_smul_set.mpr ⟨a, ha, by simp [← this]⟩) hb⟩
#align set.op_smul_inter_ne_empty_iff Set.op_smul_inter_ne_empty_iff
#align set.op_vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff Set.op_vadd_inter_ne_empty_iff
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem iUnion_inv_smul : ⋃ g : α, g⁻¹ • s = ⋃ g : α, g • s :=
(Function.Surjective.iSup_congr _ inv_surjective) fun _ ↦ rfl
#align set.Union_inv_smul Set.iUnion_inv_smul
#align set.Union_neg_vadd Set.iUnion_neg_vadd
@[to_additive]
theorem iUnion_smul_eq_setOf_exists {s : Set β} : ⋃ g : α, g • s = { a | ∃ g : α, g • a ∈ s } := by
simp_rw [← iUnion_setOf, ← iUnion_inv_smul, ← preimage_smul, preimage]
#align set.Union_smul_eq_set_of_exists Set.iUnion_smul_eq_setOf_exists
#align set.Union_vadd_eq_set_of_exists Set.iUnion_vadd_eq_setOf_exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_smul_set_distrib (a : α) (s : Set α) : (a • s)⁻¹ = op a⁻¹ • s⁻¹ := by
ext; simp [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma inv_op_smul_set_distrib (a : α) (s : Set α) : (op a • s)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ • s⁻¹ := by
ext; simp [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma smul_set_disjoint_iff : Disjoint (a • s) (a • t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp [disjoint_iff, ← smul_set_inter]
end Group
section GroupWithZero
variable [GroupWithZero α] [MulAction α β] {s t : Set β} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem smul_mem_smul_set_iff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (A : Set β) (x : β) : a • x ∈ a • A ↔ x ∈ A :=
show Units.mk0 a ha • _ ∈ _ ↔ _ from smul_mem_smul_set_iff
#align set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff₀ Set.smul_mem_smul_set_iff₀
theorem mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (A : Set β) (x : β) : x ∈ a • A ↔ a⁻¹ • x ∈ A :=
show _ ∈ Units.mk0 a ha • _ ↔ _ from mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem
#align set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ Set.mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀
theorem mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (A : Set β) (x : β) : x ∈ a⁻¹ • A ↔ a • x ∈ A :=
show _ ∈ (Units.mk0 a ha)⁻¹ • _ ↔ _ from mem_inv_smul_set_iff
#align set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀ Set.mem_inv_smul_set_iff₀
theorem preimage_smul₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (t : Set β) : (fun x ↦ a • x) ⁻¹' t = a⁻¹ • t :=
preimage_smul (Units.mk0 a ha) t
#align set.preimage_smul₀ Set.preimage_smul₀
theorem preimage_smul_inv₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) (t : Set β) : (fun x ↦ a⁻¹ • x) ⁻¹' t = a • t :=
preimage_smul (Units.mk0 a ha)⁻¹ t
#align set.preimage_smul_inv₀ Set.preimage_smul_inv₀
@[simp]
theorem set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) {A B : Set β} : a • A ⊆ a • B ↔ A ⊆ B :=
show Units.mk0 a ha • _ ⊆ _ ↔ _ from set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff
#align set.set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff₀ Set.set_smul_subset_set_smul_iff₀
theorem set_smul_subset_iff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) {A B : Set β} : a • A ⊆ B ↔ A ⊆ a⁻¹ • B :=
show Units.mk0 a ha • _ ⊆ _ ↔ _ from set_smul_subset_iff
#align set.set_smul_subset_iff₀ Set.set_smul_subset_iff₀
theorem subset_set_smul_iff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) {A B : Set β} : A ⊆ a • B ↔ a⁻¹ • A ⊆ B :=
show _ ⊆ Units.mk0 a ha • _ ↔ _ from subset_set_smul_iff
#align set.subset_set_smul_iff₀ Set.subset_set_smul_iff₀
theorem smul_set_inter₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a • (s ∩ t) = a • s ∩ a • t :=
show Units.mk0 a ha • _ = _ from smul_set_inter
#align set.smul_set_inter₀ Set.smul_set_inter₀
theorem smul_set_sdiff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a • (s \ t) = a • s \ a • t :=
image_diff (MulAction.injective₀ ha) _ _
#align set.smul_set_sdiff₀ Set.smul_set_sdiff₀
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem smul_set_symmDiff₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a • s ∆ t = (a • s) ∆ (a • t) :=
image_symmDiff (MulAction.injective₀ ha) _ _
#align set.smul_set_symm_diff₀ Set.smul_set_symmDiff₀
theorem smul_set_univ₀ (ha : a ≠ 0) : a • (univ : Set β) = univ :=
image_univ_of_surjective <| MulAction.surjective₀ ha
#align set.smul_set_univ₀ Set.smul_set_univ₀
theorem smul_univ₀ {s : Set α} (hs : ¬s ⊆ 0) : s • (univ : Set β) = univ :=
let ⟨a, ha, ha₀⟩ := not_subset.1 hs
eq_univ_of_forall fun b ↦ ⟨a, ha, a⁻¹ • b, trivial, smul_inv_smul₀ ha₀ _⟩
#align set.smul_univ₀ Set.smul_univ₀
theorem smul_univ₀' {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s • (univ : Set β) = univ :=
smul_univ₀ hs.not_subset_singleton
#align set.smul_univ₀' Set.smul_univ₀'
@[simp] protected lemma inv_zero : (0 : Set α)⁻¹ = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma inv_smul_set_distrib₀ (a : α) (s : Set α) : (a • s)⁻¹ = op a⁻¹ • s⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty <;> simp [*]
· ext; simp [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀, *]
@[simp] lemma inv_op_smul_set_distrib₀ (a : α) (s : Set α) : (op a • s)⁻¹ = a⁻¹ • s⁻¹ := by
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· obtain rfl | hs := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty <;> simp [*]
· ext; simp [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀, *]
end GroupWithZero
section Monoid
variable [Monoid α] [AddGroup β] [DistribMulAction α β] (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : Set β)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Pointwise/SMul.lean | 1,128 | 1,129 | theorem smul_set_neg : a • -t = -(a • t) := by |
simp_rw [← image_smul, ← image_neg, image_image, smul_neg]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vsub_iff sbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vsub_const_iff sbtw_vsub_const_iff
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
#align sbtw.wbtw Sbtw.wbtw
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
#align sbtw.ne_left Sbtw.ne_left
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
#align sbtw.left_ne Sbtw.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
#align sbtw.ne_right Sbtw.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
#align sbtw.right_ne Sbtw.right_ne
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
#align sbtw.mem_image_Ioo Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.mem_affine_span Wbtw.mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
#align wbtw_comm wbtw_comm
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
#align wbtw.symm Wbtw.symm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
#align sbtw_comm sbtw_comm
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
#align sbtw.symm Sbtw.symm
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_left wbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_right wbtw_self_right
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Originally `simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h`
have ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := h
rw [h₂.symm, lineMap_same_apply]
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
#align wbtw_self_iff wbtw_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_left not_sbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_right not_sbtw_self_right
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
#align sbtw.left_ne_right Sbtw.left_ne_right
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
#align sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self not_sbtw_self
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
#align wbtw_swap_left_iff wbtw_swap_left_iff
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
#align wbtw_swap_right_iff wbtw_swap_right_iff
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
#align wbtw_rotate_iff wbtw_rotate_iff
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_left_iff Wbtw.swap_left_iff
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 393 | 394 | theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by | rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton Finset.disjoint_singleton
theorem disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
#align finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty Finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [Finset.disjoint_left, Set.disjoint_left, mem_coe]
#align finset.disjoint_coe Finset.disjoint_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_coe {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (fun i => f i : ι → Set α) ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => disjoint_coe
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_coe Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_coe
end Disjoint
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disjUnion s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) : Finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, Multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, disjoint_val.2 h⟩⟩
#align finset.disj_union Finset.disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion {α s t h a} : a ∈ @disjUnion α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply List.mem_append
#align finset.mem_disj_union Finset.mem_disjUnion
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_disjUnion {s t : Finset α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
(disjUnion s t h : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem disjUnion_comm (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
disjUnion s t h = disjUnion t s h.symm :=
eq_of_veq <| add_comm _ _
#align finset.disj_union_comm Finset.disjUnion_comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_disjUnion (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint ∅ t := disjoint_bot_left) :
disjUnion ∅ t h = t :=
eq_of_veq <| zero_add _
#align finset.empty_disj_union Finset.empty_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_empty (s : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right) :
disjUnion s ∅ h = s :=
eq_of_veq <| add_zero _
#align finset.disj_union_empty Finset.disjUnion_empty
theorem singleton_disjUnion (a : α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint {a} t) :
disjUnion {a} t h = cons a t (disjoint_singleton_left.mp h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_add _ _
#align finset.singleton_disj_union Finset.singleton_disjUnion
theorem disjUnion_singleton (s : Finset α) (a : α) (h : Disjoint s {a}) :
disjUnion s {a} h = cons a s (disjoint_singleton_right.mp h) := by
rw [disjUnion_comm, singleton_disjUnion]
#align finset.disj_union_singleton Finset.disjUnion_singleton
/-! ### insert -/
section Insert
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : Insert α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩ :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_def Finset.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_val Finset.insert_val
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = dedup (a ::ₘ s.1) := by
rw [dedup_cons, dedup_eq_self]; rfl
#align finset.insert_val' Finset.insert_val'
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := by
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.insert_val_of_not_mem Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
mem_ndinsert
#align finset.mem_insert Finset.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∈ insert a s :=
mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
#align finset.mem_insert_self Finset.mem_insert_self
theorem mem_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.mem_insert_of_mem Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
#align finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (ha : b ∈ insert a s) (hb : b ∉ s) : b = a :=
(mem_insert.1 ha).resolve_right hb
#align finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
/-- A version of `LawfulSingleton.insert_emptyc_eq` that works with `dsimp`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] lemma insert_empty : insert a (∅ : Finset α) = {a} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_insert (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.cons_eq_insert Finset.cons_eq_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff]
#align finset.coe_insert Finset.coe_insert
theorem mem_insert_coe {s : Finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : Set α) := by
simp
#align finset.mem_insert_coe Finset.mem_insert_coe
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq <| ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.insert_eq_of_mem Finset.insert_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert_self _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align finset.insert_eq_self Finset.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align finset.insert_ne_self Finset.insert_ne_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.pair_eq_singleton Finset.pair_eq_singleton
theorem Insert.comm (a b : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, or_left_comm]
#align finset.insert.comm Finset.Insert.comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pair {a b : α} : (({a, b} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a, b} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_pair Finset.coe_pair
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_pair {s : Finset α} {a b : α} : (s : Set α) = {a, b} ↔ s = {a, b} := by
rw [← coe_pair, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_pair Finset.coe_eq_pair
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Finset α) = {b, a} :=
Insert.comm a b ∅
#align finset.pair_comm Finset.pair_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, ← or_assoc, or_self_iff]
#align finset.insert_idem Finset.insert_idem
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
#align finset.insert_nonempty Finset.insert_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
#align finset.insert_ne_empty Finset.insert_ne_empty
-- Porting note: explicit universe annotation is no longer required.
instance (i : α) (s : Finset α) : Nonempty ((insert i s : Finset α) : Set α) :=
(Finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : Finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ≠ insert a t := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem Finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.insert_subset Finset.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha,hs⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s := fun _b => mem_insert_of_mem
#align finset.subset_insert Finset.subset_insert
@[gcongr]
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, Subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
#align finset.insert_subset_insert Finset.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] lemma insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp_rw [← coe_subset]; simp [-coe_subset, ha]
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert_self _ _) ha, congr_arg (insert · s)⟩
#align finset.insert_inj Finset.insert_inj
theorem insert_inj_on (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) sᶜ := fun _ h _ _ =>
(insert_inj h).1
#align finset.insert_inj_on Finset.insert_inj_on
theorem ssubset_iff : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := mod_cast @Set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff Finset.ssubset_iff
theorem ssubset_insert (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align finset.ssubset_insert Finset.ssubset_insert
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (empty : p ∅)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ => by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => exact empty
| cons a s IH =>
rw [mk_cons nd]
exact cons a _ _ (IH _)
#align finset.cons_induction Finset.cons_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : p s :=
cons_induction h₁ h₂ s
#align finset.cons_induction_on Finset.cons_induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (empty : p ∅)
(insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s :=
cons_induction empty fun a s ha => (s.cons_eq_insert a ha).symm ▸ insert ha
#align finset.induction Finset.induction
/-- To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α)
(empty : p ∅) (insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
Finset.induction empty insert s
#align finset.induction_on Finset.induction_on
/-- To prove a proposition about `S : Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (S : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Finset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ has hqs hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 hs
h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS))
(Finset.Subset.refl S)
#align finset.induction_on' Finset.induction_on'
/-- To prove a proposition about a nonempty `s : Finset α`, it suffices to show it holds for all
singletons and that if it holds for nonempty `t : Finset α`, then it also holds for the `Finset`
obtained by inserting an element in `t`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Nonempty.cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : ∀ s : Finset α, s.Nonempty → Prop}
(singleton : ∀ a, p {a} (singleton_nonempty _))
(cons : ∀ a s (h : a ∉ s) (hs), p s hs → p (Finset.cons a s h) (nonempty_cons h))
{s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : p s hs := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact (not_nonempty_empty hs).elim
| cons a t ha h =>
obtain rfl | ht := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact singleton a
· exact cons a t ha ht (h ht)
#align finset.nonempty.cons_induction Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction
lemma Nonempty.exists_cons_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∃ t a ha, cons a t ha = s :=
hs.cons_induction (fun a ↦ ⟨∅, a, _, cons_empty _⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtypeInsertEquivOption {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{ i // i ∈ insert x t } ≃ Option { i // i ∈ t } where
toFun y := if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩
invFun y := (y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩) fun z => ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩
left_inv y := by
by_cases h : ↑y = x
· simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, h, Option.elim, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_mk]
· simp only [h, Option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := by
rintro (_ | y)
· simp only [Option.elim, dif_pos]
· have : ↑y ≠ x := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact h y.2
simp only [this, Option.elim, Subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option Finset.subtypeInsertEquivOption
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_left : Disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_left Finset.disjoint_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_right : Disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_insert_left, _root_.disjoint_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_right Finset.disjoint_insert_right
end Insert
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Union (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, t.2.ndunion s.1⟩⟩
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Inter (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, s.2.ndinter t.1⟩⟩
instance : Lattice (Finset α) :=
{ Finset.partialOrder with
sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hs ht _ ha => (mem_ndunion.1 ha).elim (fun h => hs h) fun h => ht h
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inl h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inr h
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ht hu _ h => mem_ndinter.2 ⟨ht h, hu h⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).2 }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : (Sup.sup : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Union.union :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_eq_union Finset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : (Inf.inf : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Inter.inter :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_eq_inter Finset.inf_eq_inter
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
instance decidableDisjoint (U V : Finset α) : Decidable (Disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_disjoint Finset.decidableDisjoint
/-! #### union -/
theorem union_val_nd (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = ndunion s.1 t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.union_val_nd Finset.union_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem union_val (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = s.1 ∪ t.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s.2
#align finset.union_val Finset.union_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
mem_ndunion
#align finset.mem_union Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.disj_union_eq_union Finset.disjUnion_eq_union
theorem mem_union_left (t : Finset α) (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inl h
#align finset.mem_union_left Finset.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right (s : Finset α) (h : a ∈ t) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.mem_union_right Finset.mem_union_right
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s ∪ t, p a) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, p a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ t, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a => h a ∘ mem_union_left _, fun b => h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
fun h _ab hab => (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
#align finset.forall_mem_union Finset.forall_mem_union
theorem not_mem_union : a ∉ s ∪ t ↔ a ∉ s ∧ a ∉ t := by rw [mem_union, not_or]
#align finset.not_mem_union Finset.not_mem_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_union
#align finset.coe_union Finset.coe_union
theorem union_subset (hs : s ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u → s ∪ t ⊆ u :=
sup_le <| le_iff_subset.2 hs
#align finset.union_subset Finset.union_subset
theorem subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_left _
#align finset.subset_union_left Finset.subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_right _
#align finset.subset_union_right Finset.subset_union_right
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htv : t ⊆ v) : s ∪ t ⊆ u ∪ v :=
sup_le_sup (le_iff_subset.2 hsu) htv
#align finset.union_subset_union Finset.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align finset.union_subset_union_left Finset.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align finset.union_subset_union_right Finset.union_subset_union_right
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ := sup_comm _ _
#align finset.union_comm Finset.union_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) := sup_assoc _ _ _
#align finset.union_assoc Finset.union_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_idempotent (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s := sup_idem _
#align finset.union_idempotent Finset.union_idempotent
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_subset_left (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u :=
subset_union_left.trans h
#align finset.union_subset_left Finset.union_subset_left
theorem union_subset_right {s t u : Finset α} (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u :=
Subset.trans subset_union_right h
#align finset.union_subset_right Finset.union_subset_right
theorem union_left_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_union, or_left_comm]
#align finset.union_left_comm Finset.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ t :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, @or_comm (x ∈ t)]
#align finset.union_right_comm Finset.union_right_comm
theorem union_self (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
union_idempotent s
#align finset.union_self Finset.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.union_empty Finset.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_union Finset.empty_union
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inl {s t : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_left
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inr {s t : Finset α} (h : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_right
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_eq Finset.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
#align finset.insert_union Finset.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
#align finset.union_insert Finset.union_insert
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t := by
simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
#align finset.insert_union_distrib Finset.insert_union_distrib
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s := sup_eq_left
#align finset.union_eq_left_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_left
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union : s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_left]
#align finset.left_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.left_eq_union
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t := sup_eq_right
#align finset.union_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_right
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union : s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_right]
#align finset.right_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.right_eq_union
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.union_congr_left Finset.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.union_congr_right Finset.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_left Finset.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_right Finset.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_left Finset.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_right Finset.disjoint_union_right
/-- To prove a relation on pairs of `Finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `Finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
theorem induction_on_union (P : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) (symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅) (singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) : ∀ a b, P a b := by
intro a b
refine Finset.induction_on b empty_right fun x s _xs hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
apply union_of _ (symm hi)
refine Finset.induction_on a empty_right fun a t _ta hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
exact union_of singletons (symm hi)
#align finset.induction_on_union Finset.induction_on_union
/-! #### inter -/
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.inter_val_nd Finset.inter_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
#align finset.inter_val Finset.inter_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ :=
mem_ndinter
#align finset.mem_inter Finset.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).1
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₂ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).2
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
#align finset.mem_inter_of_mem Finset.mem_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_subset_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_left
#align finset.inter_subset_left Finset.inter_subset_left
theorem inter_subset_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_right
#align finset.inter_subset_right Finset.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ u : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ u → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ u := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [subset_iff, mem_inter]
#align finset.subset_inter Finset.subset_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_inter
#align finset.coe_inter Finset.coe_inter
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_left]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_left Finset.union_inter_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_right Finset.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
#align finset.inter_comm Finset.inter_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
#align finset.inter_assoc Finset.inter_assoc
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_left_comm]
#align finset.inter_left_comm Finset.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_right_comm]
#align finset.inter_right_comm Finset.inter_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (s : Finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| and_self_iff
#align finset.inter_self Finset.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.inter_empty Finset.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_inter Finset.empty_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_self (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s := by
rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.inter_union_self Finset.inter_union_self
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂ := or_iff_right_of_imp <| by rintro rfl; exact h
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_left, this]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun x => by
have : ¬(x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂) := by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_right, this, false_or_iff]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅ by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_not_mem
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter {x y s t : Finset α} (h : x ⊆ y) (h' : s ⊆ t) : x ∩ s ⊆ y ∩ t := by
intro a a_in
rw [Finset.mem_inter] at a_in ⊢
exact ⟨h a_in.1, h' a_in.2⟩
#align finset.inter_subset_inter Finset.inter_subset_inter
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_left (h : t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter Subset.rfl h
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_left Finset.inter_subset_inter_left
@[gcongr]
theorem inter_subset_inter_right (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∩ u ⊆ t ∩ u :=
inter_subset_inter h Subset.rfl
#align finset.inter_subset_inter_right Finset.inter_subset_inter_right
theorem inter_subset_union : s ∩ t ⊆ s ∪ t :=
le_iff_subset.1 inf_le_sup
#align finset.inter_subset_union Finset.inter_subset_union
instance : DistribLattice (Finset α) :=
{ le_sup_inf := fun a b c => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only
[sup_eq_union, inf_eq_inter, le_eq_subset, subset_iff, mem_inter, mem_union, and_imp,
or_imp, true_or_iff, imp_true_iff, true_and_iff, or_true_iff] }
@[simp]
theorem union_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ (s ∪ t) = s ∪ t := sup_left_idem _ _
#align finset.union_left_idem Finset.union_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem union_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ t = s ∪ t := sup_right_idem _ _
#align finset.union_right_idem Finset.union_right_idem
@[simp]
theorem inter_left_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (s ∩ t) = s ∩ t := inf_left_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_left_idem Finset.inter_left_idem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem inter_right_idem (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ t = s ∩ t := inf_right_idem _ _
#align finset.inter_right_idem Finset.inter_right_idem
theorem inter_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ u) = s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ u :=
inf_sup_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_union_distrib_left
theorem union_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) ∩ u = s ∩ u ∪ t ∩ u :=
inf_sup_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_distrib_right Finset.union_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∩ u = (s ∪ t) ∩ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_left Finset.union_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∪ u = (s ∪ u) ∩ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_inf_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_distrib_right Finset.inter_union_distrib_right
-- 2024-03-22
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_left := inter_union_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias inter_distrib_right := union_inter_distrib_right
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_left := union_inter_distrib_left
@[deprecated] alias union_distrib_right := inter_union_distrib_right
theorem union_union_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = s ∪ t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_left Finset.union_union_distrib_left
theorem union_union_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ u) :=
sup_sup_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_distrib_right Finset.union_union_distrib_right
theorem inter_inter_distrib_left (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∩ u) = s ∩ t ∩ (s ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_left _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_left Finset.inter_inter_distrib_left
theorem inter_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ u = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ u) :=
inf_inf_distrib_right _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_distrib_right Finset.inter_inter_distrib_right
theorem union_union_union_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ (u ∪ v) = s ∪ u ∪ (t ∪ v) :=
sup_sup_sup_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.union_union_union_comm Finset.union_union_union_comm
theorem inter_inter_inter_comm (s t u v : Finset α) : s ∩ t ∩ (u ∩ v) = s ∩ u ∩ (t ∩ v) :=
inf_inf_inf_comm _ _ _ _
#align finset.inter_inter_inter_comm Finset.inter_inter_inter_comm
lemma union_eq_empty : s ∪ t = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∧ t = ∅ := sup_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.union_eq_empty_iff Finset.union_eq_empty
theorem union_subset_iff : s ∪ t ⊆ u ↔ s ⊆ u ∧ t ⊆ u :=
(sup_le_iff : s ⊔ t ≤ u ↔ s ≤ u ∧ t ≤ u)
#align finset.union_subset_iff Finset.union_subset_iff
theorem subset_inter_iff : s ⊆ t ∩ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ⊆ u :=
(le_inf_iff : s ≤ t ⊓ u ↔ s ≤ t ∧ s ≤ u)
#align finset.subset_inter_iff Finset.subset_inter_iff
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_left : s ∩ t = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_left
#align finset.inter_eq_left_iff_subset_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_left
@[simp] lemma inter_eq_right : t ∩ s = s ↔ s ⊆ t := inf_eq_right
#align finset.inter_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.inter_eq_right
theorem inter_congr_left (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) (hu : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : s ∩ t = s ∩ u :=
inf_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.inter_congr_left Finset.inter_congr_left
theorem inter_congr_right (hs : t ∩ u ⊆ s) (ht : s ∩ u ⊆ t) : s ∩ u = t ∩ u :=
inf_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.inter_congr_right Finset.inter_congr_right
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_left : s ∩ t = s ∩ u ↔ s ∩ u ⊆ t ∧ s ∩ t ⊆ u :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_left
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_left
theorem inter_eq_inter_iff_right : s ∩ u = t ∩ u ↔ t ∩ u ⊆ s ∧ s ∩ u ⊆ t :=
inf_eq_inf_iff_right
#align finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right Finset.inter_eq_inter_iff_right
theorem ite_subset_union (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : ite P s s' ⊆ s ∪ s' :=
ite_le_sup s s' P
#align finset.ite_subset_union Finset.ite_subset_union
theorem inter_subset_ite (s s' : Finset α) (P : Prop) [Decidable P] : s ∩ s' ⊆ ite P s s' :=
inf_le_ite s s' P
#align finset.inter_subset_ite Finset.inter_subset_ite
theorem not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ (s ∩ t).Nonempty :=
not_disjoint_iff.trans <| by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter Finset.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.not_disjoint⟩ := not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter
#align finset.nonempty.not_disjoint Finset.Nonempty.not_disjoint
theorem disjoint_or_nonempty_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint s t ∨ (s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
exact em _
#align finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter Finset.disjoint_or_nonempty_inter
end Lattice
instance isDirected_le : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) := by classical infer_instance
instance isDirected_subset : IsDirected (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) := isDirected_le
/-! ### erase -/
section Erase
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `erase s a` is the set `s - {a}`, that is, the elements of `s` which are
not equal to `a`. -/
def erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : Finset α :=
⟨_, s.2.erase a⟩
#align finset.erase Finset.erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_val (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (erase s a).1 = s.1.erase a :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_val Finset.erase_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_erase {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ erase s b ↔ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ s :=
s.2.mem_erase_iff
#align finset.mem_erase Finset.mem_erase
theorem not_mem_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∉ erase s a :=
s.2.not_mem_erase
#align finset.not_mem_erase Finset.not_mem_erase
-- While this can be solved by `simp`, this lemma is eligible for `dsimp`
@[nolint simpNF, simp]
theorem erase_empty (a : α) : erase ∅ a = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.erase_empty Finset.erase_empty
protected lemma Nontrivial.erase_nonempty (hs : s.Nontrivial) : (s.erase a).Nonempty :=
(hs.exists_ne a).imp $ by aesop
@[simp] lemma erase_nonempty (ha : a ∈ s) : (s.erase a).Nonempty ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_erase, and_comm (b := _ ∈ _)]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ hs.exists_ne a⟩
rintro ⟨b, hb, hba⟩
exact ⟨_, hb, _, ha, hba⟩
@[simp]
theorem erase_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).erase a = ∅ := by
ext x
simp
#align finset.erase_singleton Finset.erase_singleton
theorem ne_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ≠ a := fun h => (mem_erase.1 h).1
#align finset.ne_of_mem_erase Finset.ne_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_of_mem_erase : b ∈ erase s a → b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_of_mem_erase
#align finset.mem_of_mem_erase Finset.mem_of_mem_erase
theorem mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem : a ≠ b → a ∈ s → a ∈ erase s b := by
simp only [mem_erase]; exact And.intro
#align finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem Finset.mem_erase_of_ne_of_mem
/-- An element of `s` that is not an element of `erase s a` must be`a`. -/
theorem eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase (hs : b ∈ s) (hsa : b ∉ s.erase a) : b = a := by
rw [mem_erase, not_and] at hsa
exact not_imp_not.mp hsa hs
#align finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase Finset.eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase s a = s :=
eq_of_veq <| erase_of_not_mem h
#align finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem Finset.erase_eq_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem erase_eq_self : s.erase a = s ↔ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ not_mem_erase _ _, erase_eq_of_not_mem⟩
#align finset.erase_eq_self Finset.erase_eq_self
@[simp]
theorem erase_insert_eq_erase (s : Finset α) (a : α) : (insert a s).erase a = s.erase a :=
ext fun x => by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_congr_right_iff,
false_or_iff, iff_self_iff, imp_true_iff]
#align finset.erase_insert_eq_erase Finset.erase_insert_eq_erase
theorem erase_insert {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : erase (insert a s) a = s := by
rw [erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_insert Finset.erase_insert
theorem erase_insert_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ≠ b) :
erase (insert a s) b = insert a (erase s b) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x ≠ b ∧ x = a ↔ x = a := and_iff_right_of_imp fun hx => hx.symm ▸ h
simp only [mem_erase, mem_insert, and_or_left, this]
#align finset.erase_insert_of_ne Finset.erase_insert_of_ne
theorem erase_cons_of_ne {a b : α} {s : Finset α} (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : a ≠ b) :
erase (cons a s ha) b = cons a (erase s b) fun h => ha <| erase_subset _ _ h := by
simp only [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_of_ne hb]
#align finset.erase_cons_of_ne Finset.erase_cons_of_ne
@[simp] theorem insert_erase (h : a ∈ s) : insert a (erase s a) = s :=
ext fun x => by
simp only [mem_insert, mem_erase, or_and_left, dec_em, true_and_iff]
apply or_iff_right_of_imp
rintro rfl
exact h
#align finset.insert_erase Finset.insert_erase
lemma erase_eq_iff_eq_insert (hs : a ∈ s) (ht : a ∉ t) : erase s a = t ↔ s = insert a t := by
aesop
lemma insert_erase_invOn :
Set.InvOn (insert a) (fun s ↦ erase s a) {s : Finset α | a ∈ s} {s : Finset α | a ∉ s} :=
⟨fun _s ↦ insert_erase, fun _s ↦ erase_insert⟩
theorem erase_subset_erase (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : erase s a ⊆ erase t a :=
val_le_iff.1 <| erase_le_erase _ <| val_le_iff.2 h
#align finset.erase_subset_erase Finset.erase_subset_erase
theorem erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase s a ⊆ s :=
Multiset.erase_subset _ _
#align finset.erase_subset Finset.erase_subset
theorem subset_erase {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ t.erase a ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ a ∉ s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.trans (erase_subset _ _), fun ha => not_mem_erase _ _ (h ha)⟩,
fun h _b hb => mem_erase.2 ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hb h.2, h.1 hb⟩⟩
#align finset.subset_erase Finset.subset_erase
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(erase s a) = (s \ {a} : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_erase.trans <| by rw [and_comm, Set.mem_diff, Set.mem_singleton_iff, mem_coe]
#align finset.coe_erase Finset.coe_erase
theorem erase_ssubset {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s.erase a ⊂ s :=
calc
s.erase a ⊂ insert a (s.erase a) := ssubset_insert <| not_mem_erase _ _
_ = _ := insert_erase h
#align finset.erase_ssubset Finset.erase_ssubset
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, s ⊆ t.erase a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset h <| erase_ssubset ha⟩
obtain ⟨a, ht, hs⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, subset_erase.2 ⟨h.1, hs⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase
theorem erase_ssubset_insert (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff_exists_subset_erase.2
⟨a, mem_insert_self _ _, erase_subset_erase _ <| subset_insert _ _⟩
#align finset.erase_ssubset_insert Finset.erase_ssubset_insert
theorem erase_ne_self : s.erase a ≠ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
erase_eq_self.not_left
#align finset.erase_ne_self Finset.erase_ne_self
theorem erase_cons {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : (s.cons a h).erase a = s := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, erase_insert_eq_erase, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.erase_cons Finset.erase_cons
theorem erase_idem {a : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) a = erase s a := by simp
#align finset.erase_idem Finset.erase_idem
theorem erase_right_comm {a b : α} {s : Finset α} : erase (erase s a) b = erase (erase s b) a := by
ext x
simp only [mem_erase, ← and_assoc]
rw [@and_comm (x ≠ a)]
#align finset.erase_right_comm Finset.erase_right_comm
theorem subset_insert_iff {a : α} {s t : Finset α} : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ erase s a ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, or_iff_not_imp_left, mem_erase, mem_insert, and_imp]
exact forall_congr' fun x => forall_swap
#align finset.subset_insert_iff Finset.subset_insert_iff
theorem erase_insert_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : erase (insert a s) a ⊆ s :=
subset_insert_iff.1 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.erase_insert_subset Finset.erase_insert_subset
theorem insert_erase_subset (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a (erase s a) :=
subset_insert_iff.2 <| Subset.rfl
#align finset.insert_erase_subset Finset.insert_erase_subset
theorem subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [subset_insert_iff, erase_eq_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem Finset.subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem
theorem erase_subset_iff_of_mem (h : a ∈ t) : s.erase a ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rw [← subset_insert_iff, insert_eq_of_mem h]
#align finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem Finset.erase_subset_iff_of_mem
theorem erase_inj {x y : α} (s : Finset α) (hx : x ∈ s) : s.erase x = s.erase y ↔ x = y := by
refine ⟨fun h => eq_of_mem_of_not_mem_erase hx ?_, congr_arg _⟩
rw [← h]
simp
#align finset.erase_inj Finset.erase_inj
theorem erase_injOn (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn s.erase s := fun _ _ _ _ => (erase_inj s ‹_›).mp
#align finset.erase_inj_on Finset.erase_injOn
theorem erase_injOn' (a : α) : { s : Finset α | a ∈ s }.InjOn fun s => erase s a :=
fun s hs t ht (h : s.erase a = _) => by rw [← insert_erase hs, ← insert_erase ht, h]
#align finset.erase_inj_on' Finset.erase_injOn'
end Erase
lemma Nontrivial.exists_cons_eq {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nontrivial) :
∃ t a ha b hb hab, (cons b t hb).cons a (mem_cons.not.2 <| not_or_intro hab ha) = s := by
classical
obtain ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ := hs
have : b ∈ s.erase a := mem_erase.2 ⟨hab.symm, hb⟩
refine ⟨(s.erase a).erase b, a, ?_, b, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp [insert_erase this, insert_erase ha, *]
/-! ### sdiff -/
section Sdiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s \ t` is the set consisting of the elements of `s` that are not in `t`. -/
instance : SDiff (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s₁ s₂ => ⟨s₁.1 - s₂.1, nodup_of_le tsub_le_self s₁.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ \ s₂).val = s₁.val - s₂.val :=
rfl
#align finset.sdiff_val Finset.sdiff_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_sdiff : a ∈ s \ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t :=
mem_sub_of_nodup s.2
#align finset.mem_sdiff Finset.mem_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem inter_sdiff_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ \ s₁) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_sdiff]; rintro x ⟨h, _, hn⟩; exact hn h
#align finset.inter_sdiff_self Finset.inter_sdiff_self
instance : GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra (Finset α) :=
{ sup_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, mem_union, mem_sdiff, inf_eq_inter, sup_eq_union, mem_inter,
← and_or_left, em, and_true, implies_true]
inf_inf_sdiff := fun x y => by
simp only [ext_iff, inter_sdiff_self, inter_empty, inter_assoc, false_iff_iff, inf_eq_inter,
not_mem_empty, bot_eq_empty, not_false_iff, implies_true] }
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right (h : a ∈ t) : a ∉ s \ t := by
simp only [mem_sdiff, h, not_true, not_false_iff, and_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_mem_right
theorem not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left (h : a ∉ s) : a ∉ s \ t := by simp [h]
#align finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left Finset.not_mem_sdiff_of_not_mem_left
theorem union_sdiff_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s ∪ t \ s = t :=
sup_sdiff_cancel_right h
#align finset.union_sdiff_of_subset Finset.union_sdiff_of_subset
theorem sdiff_union_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂ \ s₁ ∪ s₁ = s₂ :=
(union_comm _ _).trans (union_sdiff_of_subset h)
#align finset.sdiff_union_of_subset Finset.sdiff_union_of_subset
lemma inter_sdiff_assoc (s t u : Finset α) : (s ∩ t) \ u = s ∩ (t \ u) := by
ext x; simp [and_assoc]
@[deprecated inter_sdiff_assoc (since := "2024-05-01")]
theorem inter_sdiff (s t u : Finset α) : s ∩ (t \ u) = (s ∩ t) \ u := (inter_sdiff_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align finset.inter_sdiff Finset.inter_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₂ \ s₁ ∩ s₁ = ∅ :=
inf_sdiff_self_left
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self Finset.sdiff_inter_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem sdiff_self (s₁ : Finset α) : s₁ \ s₁ = ∅ :=
_root_.sdiff_self
#align finset.sdiff_self Finset.sdiff_self
theorem sdiff_inter_distrib_right (s t u : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ u) = s \ t ∪ s \ u :=
sdiff_inf
#align finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right Finset.sdiff_inter_distrib_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_left (s t : Finset α) : s \ (s ∩ t) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_left Finset.sdiff_inter_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inter_self_right (s t : Finset α) : s \ (t ∩ s) = s \ t :=
sdiff_inf_self_right _ _
#align finset.sdiff_inter_self_right Finset.sdiff_inter_self_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_empty : s \ ∅ = s :=
sdiff_bot
#align finset.sdiff_empty Finset.sdiff_empty
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem sdiff_subset_sdiff (hst : s ⊆ t) (hvu : v ⊆ u) : s \ u ⊆ t \ v :=
sdiff_le_sdiff hst hvu
#align finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff Finset.sdiff_subset_sdiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sdiff (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ \ s₂) = (s₁ \ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_sdiff
#align finset.coe_sdiff Finset.coe_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem union_sdiff_self_eq_union : s ∪ t \ s = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_right _ _
#align finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union Finset.union_sdiff_self_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_union_self_eq_union : s \ t ∪ t = s ∪ t :=
sup_sdiff_self_left _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union Finset.sdiff_union_self_eq_union
theorem union_sdiff_left (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t \ s :=
sup_sdiff_left_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_left Finset.union_sdiff_left
theorem union_sdiff_right (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_right Finset.union_sdiff_right
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ s = t :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_left
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_left
theorem union_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s :=
h.sup_sdiff_cancel_right
#align finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right Finset.union_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem union_sdiff_symm : s ∪ t \ s = t ∪ s \ t := by simp [union_comm]
#align finset.union_sdiff_symm Finset.union_sdiff_symm
theorem sdiff_union_inter (s t : Finset α) : s \ t ∪ s ∩ t = s :=
sup_sdiff_inf _ _
#align finset.sdiff_union_inter Finset.sdiff_union_inter
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem sdiff_idem (s t : Finset α) : (s \ t) \ t = s \ t :=
_root_.sdiff_idem
#align finset.sdiff_idem Finset.sdiff_idem
theorem subset_sdiff : s ⊆ t \ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ Disjoint s u :=
le_iff_subset.symm.trans le_sdiff
#align finset.subset_sdiff Finset.subset_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset : s \ t = ∅ ↔ s ⊆ t :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff
#align finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset Finset.sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset
theorem sdiff_nonempty : (s \ t).Nonempty ↔ ¬s ⊆ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset.not
#align finset.sdiff_nonempty Finset.sdiff_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem empty_sdiff (s : Finset α) : ∅ \ s = ∅ :=
bot_sdiff
#align finset.empty_sdiff Finset.empty_sdiff
theorem insert_sdiff_of_not_mem (s : Finset α) {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
insert x s \ t = insert x (s \ t) := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_not_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_not_mem
theorem insert_sdiff_of_mem (s : Finset α) {x : α} (h : x ∈ t) : insert x s \ t = s \ t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_sdiff, coe_sdiff, coe_insert]
exact Set.insert_diff_of_mem _ h
#align finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem Finset.insert_sdiff_of_mem
@[simp] lemma insert_sdiff_cancel (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ s = {a} := by
rw [insert_sdiff_of_not_mem _ ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_emptyc_eq]
@[simp]
theorem insert_sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : insert x s \ insert x t = s \ insert x t :=
insert_sdiff_of_mem _ (mem_insert_self _ _)
#align finset.insert_sdiff_insert Finset.insert_sdiff_insert
lemma insert_sdiff_insert' (hab : a ≠ b) (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s \ insert b s = {a} := by
ext; aesop
lemma erase_sdiff_erase (hab : a ≠ b) (hb : b ∈ s) : s.erase a \ s.erase b = {b} := by
ext; aesop
lemma cons_sdiff_cons (hab : a ≠ b) (ha hb) : s.cons a ha \ s.cons b hb = {a} := by
rw [cons_eq_insert, cons_eq_insert, insert_sdiff_insert' hab ha]
theorem sdiff_insert_of_not_mem {x : α} (h : x ∉ s) (t : Finset α) : s \ insert x t = s \ t := by
refine Subset.antisymm (sdiff_subset_sdiff (Subset.refl _) (subset_insert _ _)) fun y hy => ?_
simp only [mem_sdiff, mem_insert, not_or] at hy ⊢
exact ⟨hy.1, fun hxy => h <| hxy ▸ hy.1, hy.2⟩
#align finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem Finset.sdiff_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp] theorem sdiff_subset {s t : Finset α} : s \ t ⊆ s := le_iff_subset.mp sdiff_le
#align finset.sdiff_subset Finset.sdiff_subset
theorem sdiff_ssubset (h : t ⊆ s) (ht : t.Nonempty) : s \ t ⊂ s :=
sdiff_lt (le_iff_subset.mpr h) ht.ne_empty
#align finset.sdiff_ssubset Finset.sdiff_ssubset
theorem union_sdiff_distrib (s₁ s₂ t : Finset α) : (s₁ ∪ s₂) \ t = s₁ \ t ∪ s₂ \ t :=
sup_sdiff
#align finset.union_sdiff_distrib Finset.union_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_union_distrib (s t₁ t₂ : Finset α) : s \ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s \ t₁ ∩ (s \ t₂) :=
sdiff_sup
#align finset.sdiff_union_distrib Finset.sdiff_union_distrib
theorem union_sdiff_self (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t) \ t = s \ t :=
sup_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.union_sdiff_self Finset.union_sdiff_self
-- TODO: Do we want to delete this lemma and `Finset.disjUnion_singleton`,
-- or instead add `Finset.union_singleton`/`Finset.singleton_union`?
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_erase (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s \ singleton a = erase s a := by
ext
rw [mem_erase, mem_sdiff, mem_singleton, and_comm]
#align finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_erase
-- This lemma matches `Finset.insert_eq` in functionality.
theorem erase_eq (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = s \ {a} :=
(sdiff_singleton_eq_erase _ _).symm
#align finset.erase_eq Finset.erase_eq
theorem disjoint_erase_comm : Disjoint (s.erase a) t ↔ Disjoint s (t.erase a) := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, disjoint_sdiff_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_erase_comm Finset.disjoint_erase_comm
lemma disjoint_insert_erase (ha : a ∉ t) : Disjoint (s.erase a) (insert a t) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
lemma disjoint_erase_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : Disjoint (insert a s) (t.erase a) ↔ Disjoint s t := by
rw [← disjoint_erase_comm, erase_insert ha]
theorem disjoint_of_erase_left (ha : a ∉ t) (hst : Disjoint (s.erase a) t) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, ← disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_right]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
#align finset.disjoint_of_erase_left Finset.disjoint_of_erase_left
theorem disjoint_of_erase_right (ha : a ∉ s) (hst : Disjoint s (t.erase a)) : Disjoint s t := by
rw [← erase_insert ha, disjoint_erase_comm, disjoint_insert_left]
exact ⟨not_mem_erase _ _, hst⟩
#align finset.disjoint_of_erase_right Finset.disjoint_of_erase_right
theorem inter_erase (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ t.erase a = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simp only [erase_eq, inter_sdiff_assoc]
#align finset.inter_erase Finset.inter_erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_inter (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s.erase a ∩ t = (s ∩ t).erase a := by
simpa only [inter_comm t] using inter_erase a t s
#align finset.erase_inter Finset.erase_inter
theorem erase_sdiff_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a \ t = (s \ t).erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_right_comm]
#align finset.erase_sdiff_comm Finset.erase_sdiff_comm
theorem insert_union_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : insert a s ∪ t = s ∪ insert a t := by
rw [insert_union, union_insert]
#align finset.insert_union_comm Finset.insert_union_comm
theorem erase_inter_comm (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a ∩ t = s ∩ t.erase a := by
rw [erase_inter, inter_erase]
#align finset.erase_inter_comm Finset.erase_inter_comm
theorem erase_union_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s ∪ t).erase a = s.erase a ∪ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, union_sdiff_distrib]
#align finset.erase_union_distrib Finset.erase_union_distrib
theorem insert_inter_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) :
insert a (s ∩ t) = insert a s ∩ insert a t := by simp_rw [insert_eq, union_inter_distrib_left]
#align finset.insert_inter_distrib Finset.insert_inter_distrib
theorem erase_sdiff_distrib (s t : Finset α) (a : α) : (s \ t).erase a = s.erase a \ t.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_sdiff, sup_sdiff_eq_sup le_rfl, sup_comm]
#align finset.erase_sdiff_distrib Finset.erase_sdiff_distrib
theorem erase_union_of_mem (ha : a ∈ t) (s : Finset α) : s.erase a ∪ t = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_right s ha), erase_union_distrib, ← union_insert, insert_erase ha]
#align finset.erase_union_of_mem Finset.erase_union_of_mem
theorem union_erase_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) (t : Finset α) : s ∪ t.erase a = s ∪ t := by
rw [← insert_erase (mem_union_left t ha), erase_union_distrib, ← insert_union, insert_erase ha]
#align finset.union_erase_of_mem Finset.union_erase_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_singleton_eq_self (ha : a ∉ s) : s \ {a} = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 <| by simp [ha]
#align finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_self Finset.sdiff_singleton_eq_self
theorem Nontrivial.sdiff_singleton_nonempty {c : α} {s : Finset α} (hS : s.Nontrivial) :
(s \ {c}).Nonempty := by
rw [Finset.sdiff_nonempty, Finset.subset_singleton_iff]
push_neg
exact ⟨by rintro rfl; exact Finset.not_nontrivial_empty hS, hS.ne_singleton⟩
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left' (s t u : Finset α) : (s \ t) \ u = s \ t ∩ (s \ u) :=
_root_.sdiff_sdiff_left'
#align finset.sdiff_sdiff_left' Finset.sdiff_sdiff_left'
theorem sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (hut : u ⊆ t) : s \ t ∪ t \ u = s \ u :=
sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel hts hut
#align finset.sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel Finset.sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel
theorem sdiff_union_erase_cancel (hts : t ⊆ s) (ha : a ∈ t) : s \ t ∪ t.erase a = s.erase a := by
simp_rw [erase_eq, sdiff_union_sdiff_cancel hts (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha)]
#align finset.sdiff_union_erase_cancel Finset.sdiff_union_erase_cancel
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (h : u ⊆ s) : s \ (t \ u) = s \ t ∪ u :=
sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_sup h
#align finset.sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union Finset.sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union
theorem sdiff_insert (s t : Finset α) (x : α) : s \ insert x t = (s \ t).erase x := by
simp_rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, insert_eq, sdiff_sdiff_left', sdiff_union_distrib,
inter_comm]
#align finset.sdiff_insert Finset.sdiff_insert
theorem sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem {s t : Finset α} {x : α} (hxs : x ∈ s) (hxt : x ∉ t) :
insert x (s \ insert x t) = s \ t := by
rw [sdiff_insert, insert_erase (mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hxs, hxt⟩)]
#align finset.sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem Finset.sdiff_insert_insert_of_mem_of_not_mem
theorem sdiff_erase (h : a ∈ s) : s \ t.erase a = insert a (s \ t) := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_sdiff_eq_sdiff_union (singleton_subset_iff.2 h), insert_eq,
union_comm]
#align finset.sdiff_erase Finset.sdiff_erase
theorem sdiff_erase_self (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ s.erase a = {a} := by
rw [sdiff_erase ha, Finset.sdiff_self, insert_emptyc_eq]
#align finset.sdiff_erase_self Finset.sdiff_erase_self
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self_left (s t : Finset α) : s \ (s \ t) = s ∩ t :=
sdiff_sdiff_right_self
#align finset.sdiff_sdiff_self_left Finset.sdiff_sdiff_self_left
theorem sdiff_sdiff_eq_self (h : t ⊆ s) : s \ (s \ t) = t :=
_root_.sdiff_sdiff_eq_self h
#align finset.sdiff_sdiff_eq_self Finset.sdiff_sdiff_eq_self
theorem sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inter_eq_inter {s t₁ t₂ : Finset α} :
s \ t₁ = s \ t₂ ↔ s ∩ t₁ = s ∩ t₂ :=
sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inf_eq_inf
#align finset.sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inter_eq_inter Finset.sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff_inter_eq_inter
theorem union_eq_sdiff_union_sdiff_union_inter (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ t = s \ t ∪ t \ s ∪ s ∩ t :=
sup_eq_sdiff_sup_sdiff_sup_inf
#align finset.union_eq_sdiff_union_sdiff_union_inter Finset.union_eq_sdiff_union_sdiff_union_inter
theorem erase_eq_empty_iff (s : Finset α) (a : α) : s.erase a = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, sdiff_eq_empty_iff_subset, subset_singleton_iff]
#align finset.erase_eq_empty_iff Finset.erase_eq_empty_iff
--TODO@Yaël: Kill lemmas duplicate with `BooleanAlgebra`
theorem sdiff_disjoint : Disjoint (t \ s) s :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _a ha => (mem_sdiff.1 ha).2
#align finset.sdiff_disjoint Finset.sdiff_disjoint
theorem disjoint_sdiff : Disjoint s (t \ s) :=
sdiff_disjoint.symm
#align finset.disjoint_sdiff Finset.disjoint_sdiff
theorem disjoint_sdiff_inter (s t : Finset α) : Disjoint (s \ t) (s ∩ t) :=
disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right sdiff_disjoint
#align finset.disjoint_sdiff_inter Finset.disjoint_sdiff_inter
theorem sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint : s \ t = s ↔ Disjoint s t :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint'
#align finset.sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint Finset.sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint
theorem sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint (h : Disjoint s t) : s \ t = s :=
sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint.2 h
#align finset.sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint Finset.sdiff_eq_self_of_disjoint
end Sdiff
/-! ### Symmetric difference -/
section SymmDiff
open scoped symmDiff
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_symmDiff : a ∈ s ∆ t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ a ∉ t ∨ a ∈ t ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_union, mem_union, mem_sdiff]
#align finset.mem_symm_diff Finset.mem_symmDiff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_symmDiff : (↑(s ∆ t) : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∆ t :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp [mem_symmDiff, Set.mem_symmDiff]
#align finset.coe_symm_diff Finset.coe_symmDiff
@[simp] lemma symmDiff_eq_empty : s ∆ t = ∅ ↔ s = t := symmDiff_eq_bot
@[simp] lemma symmDiff_nonempty : (s ∆ t).Nonempty ↔ s ≠ t :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans symmDiff_eq_empty.not
end SymmDiff
/-! ### attach -/
/-- `attach s` takes the elements of `s` and forms a new set of elements of the subtype
`{x // x ∈ s}`. -/
def attach (s : Finset α) : Finset { x // x ∈ s } :=
⟨Multiset.attach s.1, nodup_attach.2 s.2⟩
#align finset.attach Finset.attach
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 2,487 | 2,493 | theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Finset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by |
cases s
dsimp [SizeOf.sizeOf, SizeOf.sizeOf, Multiset.sizeOf]
rw [add_comm]
refine lt_trans ?_ (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
exact Multiset.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup
#align_import algebra.modeq from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a07d750983b94c530ab69a726862c2ab6802b38c"
/-!
# Equality modulo an element
This file defines equality modulo an element in a commutative group.
## Main definitions
* `a ≡ b [PMOD p]`: `a` and `b` are congruent modulo `p`.
## See also
`SModEq` is a generalisation to arbitrary submodules.
## TODO
Delete `Int.ModEq` in favour of `AddCommGroup.ModEq`. Generalise `SModEq` to `AddSubgroup` and
redefine `AddCommGroup.ModEq` using it. Once this is done, we can rename `AddCommGroup.ModEq`
to `AddSubgroup.ModEq` and multiplicativise it. Longer term, we could generalise to submonoids and
also unify with `Nat.ModEq`.
-/
namespace AddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup α] {p a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c : α} {n : ℕ} {z : ℤ}
/-- `a ≡ b [PMOD p]` means that `b` is congruent to `a` modulo `p`.
Equivalently (as shown in `Algebra.Order.ToIntervalMod`), `b` does not lie in the open interval
`(a, a + p)` modulo `p`, or `toIcoMod hp a` disagrees with `toIocMod hp a` at `b`, or
`toIcoDiv hp a` disagrees with `toIocDiv hp a` at `b`. -/
def ModEq (p a b : α) : Prop :=
∃ z : ℤ, b - a = z • p
#align add_comm_group.modeq AddCommGroup.ModEq
@[inherit_doc]
notation:50 a " ≡ " b " [PMOD " p "]" => ModEq p a b
@[refl, simp]
theorem modEq_refl (a : α) : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨0, by simp⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq_refl AddCommGroup.modEq_refl
theorem modEq_rfl : a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
modEq_refl _
#align add_comm_group.modeq_rfl AddCommGroup.modEq_rfl
theorem modEq_comm : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
(Equiv.neg _).exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_comm AddCommGroup.modEq_comm
alias ⟨ModEq.symm, _⟩ := modEq_comm
#align add_comm_group.modeq.symm AddCommGroup.ModEq.symm
attribute [symm] ModEq.symm
@[trans]
theorem ModEq.trans : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → b ≡ c [PMOD p] → a ≡ c [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ ⟨n, hn⟩ =>
⟨m + n, by simp [add_smul, ← hm, ← hn]⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq.trans AddCommGroup.ModEq.trans
instance : IsRefl _ (ModEq p) :=
⟨modEq_refl⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_modEq_neg : -a ≡ -b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, neg_add_eq_sub]
#align add_comm_group.neg_modeq_neg AddCommGroup.neg_modEq_neg
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg, ModEq.neg⟩ := neg_modEq_neg
#align add_comm_group.modeq.of_neg AddCommGroup.ModEq.of_neg
#align add_comm_group.modeq.neg AddCommGroup.ModEq.neg
@[simp]
theorem modEq_neg : a ≡ b [PMOD -p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| by simp [ModEq, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_neg AddCommGroup.modEq_neg
alias ⟨ModEq.of_neg', ModEq.neg'⟩ := modEq_neg
#align add_comm_group.modeq.of_neg' AddCommGroup.ModEq.of_neg'
#align add_comm_group.modeq.neg' AddCommGroup.ModEq.neg'
theorem modEq_sub (a b : α) : a ≡ b [PMOD b - a] :=
⟨1, (one_smul _ _).symm⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq_sub AddCommGroup.modEq_sub
@[simp]
theorem modEq_zero : a ≡ b [PMOD 0] ↔ a = b := by simp [ModEq, sub_eq_zero, eq_comm]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_zero AddCommGroup.modEq_zero
@[simp]
theorem self_modEq_zero : p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-1, by simp⟩
#align add_comm_group.self_modeq_zero AddCommGroup.self_modEq_zero
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zero (z : ℤ) : z • p ≡ 0 [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
#align add_comm_group.zsmul_modeq_zero AddCommGroup.zsmul_modEq_zero
theorem add_zsmul_modEq (z : ℤ) : a + z • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp⟩
#align add_comm_group.add_zsmul_modeq AddCommGroup.add_zsmul_modEq
theorem zsmul_add_modEq (z : ℤ) : z • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-z, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
#align add_comm_group.zsmul_add_modeq AddCommGroup.zsmul_add_modEq
theorem add_nsmul_modEq (n : ℕ) : a + n • p ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp⟩
#align add_comm_group.add_nsmul_modeq AddCommGroup.add_nsmul_modEq
theorem nsmul_add_modEq (n : ℕ) : n • p + a ≡ a [PMOD p] :=
⟨-n, by simp [← sub_sub]⟩
#align add_comm_group.nsmul_add_modeq AddCommGroup.nsmul_add_modEq
namespace ModEq
protected theorem add_zsmul (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + z • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_zsmul_modEq _).trans
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_zsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_zsmul
protected theorem zsmul_add (z : ℤ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(zsmul_add_modEq _).trans
#align add_comm_group.modeq.zsmul_add AddCommGroup.ModEq.zsmul_add
protected theorem add_nsmul (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → a + n • p ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(add_nsmul_modEq _).trans
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_nsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_nsmul
protected theorem nsmul_add (n : ℕ) : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • p + a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
(nsmul_add_modEq _).trans
#align add_comm_group.modeq.nsmul_add AddCommGroup.ModEq.nsmul_add
protected theorem of_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD z • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * z, by rwa [mul_smul]⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq.of_zsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.of_zsmul
protected theorem of_nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD n • p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
⟨m * n, by rwa [mul_smul, natCast_zsmul]⟩
#align add_comm_group.modeq.of_nsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.of_nsmul
protected theorem zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.zsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.zsmul
protected theorem nsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] → n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] :=
Exists.imp fun m hm => by rw [← smul_sub, hm, smul_comm]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.nsmul AddCommGroup.ModEq.nsmul
end ModEq
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_modEq_zsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℤ α] (hn : z ≠ 0) :
z • a ≡ z • b [PMOD z • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
#align add_comm_group.zsmul_modeq_zsmul AddCommGroup.zsmul_modEq_zsmul
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_modEq_nsmul [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ α] (hn : n ≠ 0) :
n • a ≡ n • b [PMOD n • p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
exists_congr fun m => by rw [← smul_sub, smul_comm, smul_right_inj hn]
#align add_comm_group.nsmul_modeq_nsmul AddCommGroup.nsmul_modEq_nsmul
alias ⟨ModEq.zsmul_cancel, _⟩ := zsmul_modEq_zsmul
#align add_comm_group.modeq.zsmul_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.zsmul_cancel
alias ⟨ModEq.nsmul_cancel, _⟩ := nsmul_modEq_nsmul
#align add_comm_group.modeq.nsmul_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.nsmul_cancel
namespace ModEq
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_iff_left AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_iff_left
@[simp]
protected theorem add_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ + a₂ ≡ b₁ + b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.addRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [add_sub_add_comm, hm, add_smul, ModEq]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_iff_right AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_iff_right
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_left :
a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subLeft m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_iff_left AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_iff_left
@[simp]
protected theorem sub_iff_right :
a₂ ≡ b₂ [PMOD p] → (a₁ - a₂ ≡ b₁ - b₂ [PMOD p] ↔ a₁ ≡ b₁ [PMOD p]) := fun ⟨m, hm⟩ =>
(Equiv.subRight m).symm.exists_congr_left.trans <| by simp [sub_sub_sub_comm, hm, sub_smul, ModEq]
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_iff_right AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_iff_right
alias ⟨add_left_cancel, add⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_left
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_left_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_left_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add AddCommGroup.ModEq.add
alias ⟨add_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.add_iff_right
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_right_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_right_cancel
alias ⟨sub_left_cancel, sub⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_left
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_left_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_left_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub
alias ⟨sub_right_cancel, _⟩ := ModEq.sub_iff_right
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_right_cancel AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_right_cancel
-- Porting note: doesn't work
-- attribute [protected] add_left_cancel add_right_cancel add sub_left_cancel sub_right_cancel sub
protected theorem add_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add h
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_left AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_left
protected theorem sub_left (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub h
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_left AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_left
protected theorem add_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
h.add modEq_rfl
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_right AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_right
protected theorem sub_right (c : α) (h : a ≡ b [PMOD p]) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] :=
h.sub modEq_rfl
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_right AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_right
protected theorem add_left_cancel' (c : α) : c + a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_left_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_left_cancel' AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_left_cancel'
protected theorem add_right_cancel' (c : α) : a + c ≡ b + c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.add_right_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.add_right_cancel' AddCommGroup.ModEq.add_right_cancel'
protected theorem sub_left_cancel' (c : α) : c - a ≡ c - b [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_left_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_left_cancel' AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_left_cancel'
protected theorem sub_right_cancel' (c : α) : a - c ≡ b - c [PMOD p] → a ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_rfl.sub_right_cancel
#align add_comm_group.modeq.sub_right_cancel' AddCommGroup.ModEq.sub_right_cancel'
end ModEq
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq' : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ c + a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by
simp [ModEq, sub_sub]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_sub_iff_add_modeq' AddCommGroup.modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'
theorem modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq : a ≡ b - c [PMOD p] ↔ a + c ≡ b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans <| by rw [add_comm]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_sub_iff_add_modeq AddCommGroup.modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add' : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b + c [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq'.trans modEq_comm
#align add_comm_group.sub_modeq_iff_modeq_add' AddCommGroup.sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add'
theorem sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add : a - b ≡ c [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ c + b [PMOD p] :=
modEq_comm.trans <| modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq.trans modEq_comm
#align add_comm_group.sub_modeq_iff_modeq_add AddCommGroup.sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add
@[simp]
theorem sub_modEq_zero : a - b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD p] := by simp [sub_modEq_iff_modEq_add]
#align add_comm_group.sub_modeq_zero AddCommGroup.sub_modEq_zero
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_left : a + b ≡ a [PMOD p] ↔ b ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq']
#align add_comm_group.add_modeq_left AddCommGroup.add_modEq_left
@[simp]
theorem add_modEq_right : a + b ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ a ≡ 0 [PMOD p] := by simp [← modEq_sub_iff_add_modEq]
#align add_comm_group.add_modeq_right AddCommGroup.add_modEq_right
theorem modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∃ z : ℤ, b = a + z • p := by
simp_rw [ModEq, sub_eq_iff_eq_add']
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_eq_add_zsmul AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_add_zsmul : ¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ ∀ z : ℤ, b ≠ a + z • p := by
rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, not_exists]
#align add_comm_group.not_modeq_iff_ne_add_zsmul AddCommGroup.not_modEq_iff_ne_add_zsmul
theorem modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples : a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) = a := by
simp_rw [modEq_iff_eq_add_zsmul, QuotientAddGroup.eq_iff_sub_mem, AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff,
eq_sub_iff_add_eq', eq_comm]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples
theorem not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples :
¬a ≡ b [PMOD p] ↔ (b : α ⧸ AddSubgroup.zmultiples p) ≠ a :=
modEq_iff_eq_mod_zmultiples.not
#align add_comm_group.not_modeq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples AddCommGroup.not_modEq_iff_ne_mod_zmultiples
end AddCommGroup
@[simp]
theorem modEq_iff_int_modEq {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD z] ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD z] := by
simp [ModEq, dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
#align add_comm_group.modeq_iff_int_modeq AddCommGroup.modEq_iff_int_modEq
section AddCommGroupWithOne
variable [AddCommGroupWithOne α] [CharZero α]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_modEq_intCast {a b z : ℤ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (z : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD z] := by
simp_rw [ModEq, ← Int.cast_mul_eq_zsmul_cast]
norm_cast
#align add_comm_group.int_cast_modeq_int_cast AddCommGroup.intCast_modEq_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_modEq_intCast' {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [PMOD (n : ℤ)] := by
simpa using intCast_modEq_intCast (α := α) (z := n)
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Algebra/ModEq.lean | 330 | 332 | theorem natCast_modEq_natCast {a b n : ℕ} : a ≡ b [PMOD (n : α)] ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by |
simp_rw [← Int.natCast_modEq_iff, ← modEq_iff_int_modEq, ← @intCast_modEq_intCast α,
Int.cast_natCast]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn, Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
#align_import set_theory.ordinal.arithmetic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31b269b60935483943542d547a6dd83a66b37dc7"
/-!
# Ordinal arithmetic
Ordinals have an addition (corresponding to disjoint union) that turns them into an additive
monoid, and a multiplication (corresponding to the lexicographic order on the product) that turns
them into a monoid. One can also define correspondingly a subtraction, a division, a successor
function, a power function and a logarithm function.
We also define limit ordinals and prove the basic induction principle on ordinals separating
successor ordinals and limit ordinals, in `limitRecOn`.
## Main definitions and results
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
* `o₁ - o₂` is the unique ordinal `o` such that `o₂ + o = o₁`, when `o₂ ≤ o₁`.
* `o₁ * o₂` is the lexicographic order on `o₂ × o₁`.
* `o₁ / o₂` is the ordinal `o` such that `o₁ = o₂ * o + o'` with `o' < o₂`. We also define the
divisibility predicate, and a modulo operation.
* `Order.succ o = o + 1` is the successor of `o`.
* `pred o` if the predecessor of `o`. If `o` is not a successor, we set `pred o = o`.
We discuss the properties of casts of natural numbers of and of `ω` with respect to these
operations.
Some properties of the operations are also used to discuss general tools on ordinals:
* `IsLimit o`: an ordinal is a limit ordinal if it is neither `0` nor a successor.
* `limitRecOn` is the main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals.
* `IsNormal`: a function `f : Ordinal → Ordinal` satisfies `IsNormal` if it is strictly increasing
and order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`.
* `enumOrd`: enumerates an unbounded set of ordinals by the ordinals themselves.
* `sup`, `lsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of an indexed family of ordinals in
`Type u`, as an ordinal in `Type u`.
* `bsup`, `blsub`: the supremum / least strict upper bound of a set of ordinals indexed by ordinals
less than a given ordinal `o`.
Various other basic arithmetic results are given in `Principal.lean` instead.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
assert_not_exists Module
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Classical
open Cardinal Ordinal
universe u v w
namespace Ordinal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
{t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Further properties of addition on ordinals -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_add (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a + b) = lift.{u} a + lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.sumLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _) (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_add Ordinal.lift_add
@[simp]
theorem lift_succ (a : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (succ a) = succ (lift.{u} a) := by
rw [← add_one_eq_succ, lift_add, lift_one]
rfl
#align ordinal.lift_succ Ordinal.lift_succ
instance add_contravariantClass_le : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun a b c =>
inductionOn a fun α r hr =>
inductionOn b fun β₁ s₁ hs₁ =>
inductionOn c fun β₂ s₂ hs₂ ⟨f⟩ =>
⟨have fl : ∀ a, f (Sum.inl a) = Sum.inl a := fun a => by
simpa only [InitialSeg.trans_apply, InitialSeg.leAdd_apply] using
@InitialSeg.eq _ _ _ _ _
((InitialSeg.leAdd r s₁).trans f) (InitialSeg.leAdd r s₂) a
have : ∀ b, { b' // f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr b' } := by
intro b; cases e : f (Sum.inr b)
· rw [← fl] at e
have := f.inj' e
contradiction
· exact ⟨_, rfl⟩
let g (b) := (this b).1
have fr : ∀ b, f (Sum.inr b) = Sum.inr (g b) := fun b => (this b).2
⟨⟨⟨g, fun x y h => by
injection f.inj' (by rw [fr, fr, h] : f (Sum.inr x) = f (Sum.inr y))⟩,
@fun a b => by
-- Porting note:
-- `relEmbedding.coe_fn_to_embedding` & `initial_seg.coe_fn_to_rel_embedding`
-- → `InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn`
simpa only [Sum.lex_inr_inr, fr, InitialSeg.coe_coe_fn, Embedding.coeFn_mk] using
@RelEmbedding.map_rel_iff _ _ _ _ f.toRelEmbedding (Sum.inr a) (Sum.inr b)⟩,
fun a b H => by
rcases f.init (by rw [fr] <;> exact Sum.lex_inr_inr.2 H) with ⟨a' | a', h⟩
· rw [fl] at h
cases h
· rw [fr] at h
exact ⟨a', Sum.inr.inj h⟩⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_le Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_le
theorem add_left_cancel (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_left]
#align ordinal.add_left_cancel Ordinal.add_left_cancel
private theorem add_lt_add_iff_left' (a) {b c : Ordinal} : a + b < a + c ↔ b < c := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, add_le_add_iff_left]
instance add_covariantClass_lt : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).2⟩
#align ordinal.add_covariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_covariantClass_lt
instance add_contravariantClass_lt : ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· + ·) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun a _b _c => (add_lt_add_iff_left' a).1⟩
#align ordinal.add_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_contravariantClass_lt
instance add_swap_contravariantClass_lt :
ContravariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· + ·)) (· < ·) :=
⟨fun _a _b _c => lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => add_le_add_right h _⟩
#align ordinal.add_swap_contravariant_class_lt Ordinal.add_swap_contravariantClass_lt
theorem add_le_add_iff_right {a b : Ordinal} : ∀ n : ℕ, a + n ≤ b + n ↔ a ≤ b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
simp only [natCast_succ, add_succ, add_succ, succ_le_succ_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right Ordinal.add_le_add_iff_right
theorem add_right_cancel {a b : Ordinal} (n : ℕ) : a + n = b + n ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, add_le_add_iff_right]
#align ordinal.add_right_cancel Ordinal.add_right_cancel
theorem add_eq_zero_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a + b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
inductionOn b fun β s _ => by
simp_rw [← type_sum_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
exact isEmpty_sum
#align ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff Ordinal.add_eq_zero_iff
theorem left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : a = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).1
#align ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.left_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
theorem right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (h : a + b = 0) : b = 0 :=
(add_eq_zero_iff.1 h).2
#align ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero Ordinal.right_eq_zero_of_add_eq_zero
/-! ### The predecessor of an ordinal -/
/-- The ordinal predecessor of `o` is `o'` if `o = succ o'`,
and `o` otherwise. -/
def pred (o : Ordinal) : Ordinal :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Classical.choose h else o
#align ordinal.pred Ordinal.pred
@[simp]
theorem pred_succ (o) : pred (succ o) = o := by
have h : ∃ a, succ o = succ a := ⟨_, rfl⟩;
simpa only [pred, dif_pos h] using (succ_injective <| Classical.choose_spec h).symm
#align ordinal.pred_succ Ordinal.pred_succ
theorem pred_le_self (o) : pred o ≤ o :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by
let ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ]; exact le_succ a
else by rw [pred, dif_neg h]
#align ordinal.pred_le_self Ordinal.pred_le_self
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ {o} : pred o = o ↔ ¬∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e ⟨a, e'⟩ => by rw [e', pred_succ] at e; exact (lt_succ a).ne e, fun h => dif_neg h⟩
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ
theorem pred_eq_iff_not_succ' {o} : pred o = o ↔ ∀ a, o ≠ succ a := by
simpa using pred_eq_iff_not_succ
#align ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ' Ordinal.pred_eq_iff_not_succ'
theorem pred_lt_iff_is_succ {o} : pred o < o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
Iff.trans (by simp only [le_antisymm_iff, pred_le_self, true_and_iff, not_le])
(iff_not_comm.1 pred_eq_iff_not_succ).symm
#align ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ Ordinal.pred_lt_iff_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem pred_zero : pred 0 = 0 :=
pred_eq_iff_not_succ'.2 fun a => (succ_ne_zero a).symm
#align ordinal.pred_zero Ordinal.pred_zero
theorem succ_pred_iff_is_succ {o} : succ (pred o) = o ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨_, e.symm⟩, fun ⟨a, e⟩ => by simp only [e, pred_succ]⟩
#align ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ Ordinal.succ_pred_iff_is_succ
theorem succ_lt_of_not_succ {o b : Ordinal} (h : ¬∃ a, o = succ a) : succ b < o ↔ b < o :=
⟨(lt_succ b).trans, fun l => lt_of_le_of_ne (succ_le_of_lt l) fun e => h ⟨_, e.symm⟩⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ Ordinal.succ_lt_of_not_succ
theorem lt_pred {a b} : a < pred b ↔ succ a < b :=
if h : ∃ a, b = succ a then by
let ⟨c, e⟩ := h
rw [e, pred_succ, succ_lt_succ_iff]
else by simp only [pred, dif_neg h, succ_lt_of_not_succ h]
#align ordinal.lt_pred Ordinal.lt_pred
theorem pred_le {a b} : pred a ≤ b ↔ a ≤ succ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 lt_pred
#align ordinal.pred_le Ordinal.pred_le
@[simp]
theorem lift_is_succ {o : Ordinal.{v}} : (∃ a, lift.{u} o = succ a) ↔ ∃ a, o = succ a :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
let ⟨b, e⟩ := lift_down <| show a ≤ lift.{u} o from le_of_lt <| h.symm ▸ lt_succ a
⟨b, lift_inj.1 <| by rw [h, ← e, lift_succ]⟩,
fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨lift.{u} a, by simp only [h, lift_succ]⟩⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_succ Ordinal.lift_is_succ
@[simp]
theorem lift_pred (o : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (pred o) = pred (lift.{u} o) :=
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then by cases' h with a e; simp only [e, pred_succ, lift_succ]
else by rw [pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 h, pred_eq_iff_not_succ.2 (mt lift_is_succ.1 h)]
#align ordinal.lift_pred Ordinal.lift_pred
/-! ### Limit ordinals -/
/-- A limit ordinal is an ordinal which is not zero and not a successor. -/
def IsLimit (o : Ordinal) : Prop :=
o ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ a < o, succ a < o
#align ordinal.is_limit Ordinal.IsLimit
theorem IsLimit.isSuccLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : IsSuccLimit o := isSuccLimit_iff_succ_lt.mpr h.2
theorem IsLimit.succ_lt {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : a < o → succ a < o :=
h.2 a
#align ordinal.is_limit.succ_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.succ_lt
theorem isSuccLimit_zero : IsSuccLimit (0 : Ordinal) := isSuccLimit_bot
theorem not_zero_isLimit : ¬IsLimit 0
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h rfl
#align ordinal.not_zero_is_limit Ordinal.not_zero_isLimit
theorem not_succ_isLimit (o) : ¬IsLimit (succ o)
| ⟨_, h⟩ => lt_irrefl _ (h _ (lt_succ o))
#align ordinal.not_succ_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_isLimit
theorem not_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) : ¬∃ a, o = succ a
| ⟨a, e⟩ => not_succ_isLimit a (e ▸ h)
#align ordinal.not_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.not_succ_of_isLimit
theorem succ_lt_of_isLimit {o a : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : succ a < o ↔ a < o :=
⟨(lt_succ a).trans, h.2 _⟩
#align ordinal.succ_lt_of_is_limit Ordinal.succ_lt_of_isLimit
theorem le_succ_of_isLimit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ succ a ↔ o ≤ a :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| succ_lt_of_isLimit h
#align ordinal.le_succ_of_is_limit Ordinal.le_succ_of_isLimit
theorem limit_le {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : o ≤ a ↔ ∀ x < o, x ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _x l => l.le.trans h, fun H =>
(le_succ_of_isLimit h).1 <| le_of_not_lt fun hn => not_lt_of_le (H _ hn) (lt_succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.limit_le Ordinal.limit_le
theorem lt_limit {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} : a < o ↔ ∃ x < o, a < x := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@limit_le _ h a)
#align ordinal.lt_limit Ordinal.lt_limit
@[simp]
theorem lift_isLimit (o) : IsLimit (lift o) ↔ IsLimit o :=
and_congr (not_congr <| by simpa only [lift_zero] using @lift_inj o 0)
⟨fun H a h => lift_lt.1 <| by simpa only [lift_succ] using H _ (lift_lt.2 h), fun H a h => by
obtain ⟨a', rfl⟩ := lift_down h.le
rw [← lift_succ, lift_lt]
exact H a' (lift_lt.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.lift_is_limit Ordinal.lift_isLimit
theorem IsLimit.pos {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 0 < o :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Ordinal.zero_le _) h.1.symm
#align ordinal.is_limit.pos Ordinal.IsLimit.pos
theorem IsLimit.one_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : 1 < o := by
simpa only [succ_zero] using h.2 _ h.pos
#align ordinal.is_limit.one_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.one_lt
theorem IsLimit.nat_lt {o : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit o) : ∀ n : ℕ, (n : Ordinal) < o
| 0 => h.pos
| n + 1 => h.2 _ (IsLimit.nat_lt h n)
#align ordinal.is_limit.nat_lt Ordinal.IsLimit.nat_lt
theorem zero_or_succ_or_limit (o : Ordinal) : o = 0 ∨ (∃ a, o = succ a) ∨ IsLimit o :=
if o0 : o = 0 then Or.inl o0
else
if h : ∃ a, o = succ a then Or.inr (Or.inl h)
else Or.inr <| Or.inr ⟨o0, fun _a => (succ_lt_of_not_succ h).2⟩
#align ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit Ordinal.zero_or_succ_or_limit
/-- Main induction principle of ordinals: if one can prove a property by
induction at successor ordinals and at limit ordinals, then it holds for all ordinals. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def limitRecOn {C : Ordinal → Sort*} (o : Ordinal) (H₁ : C 0) (H₂ : ∀ o, C o → C (succ o))
(H₃ : ∀ o, IsLimit o → (∀ o' < o, C o') → C o) : C o :=
SuccOrder.limitRecOn o (fun o _ ↦ H₂ o) fun o hl ↦
if h : o = 0 then fun _ ↦ h ▸ H₁ else H₃ o ⟨h, fun _ ↦ hl.succ_lt⟩
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on Ordinal.limitRecOn
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_zero {C} (H₁ H₂ H₃) : @limitRecOn C 0 H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₁ := by
rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ isSuccLimit_zero, dif_pos rfl]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_zero Ordinal.limitRecOn_zero
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_succ {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃) :
@limitRecOn C (succ o) H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₂ o (@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃) := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_succ _ _ (not_isMax _)]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_succ Ordinal.limitRecOn_succ
@[simp]
theorem limitRecOn_limit {C} (o H₁ H₂ H₃ h) :
@limitRecOn C o H₁ H₂ H₃ = H₃ o h fun x _h => @limitRecOn C x H₁ H₂ H₃ := by
simp_rw [limitRecOn, SuccOrder.limitRecOn_limit _ _ h.isSuccLimit, dif_neg h.1]
#align ordinal.limit_rec_on_limit Ordinal.limitRecOn_limit
instance orderTopOutSucc (o : Ordinal) : OrderTop (succ o).out.α :=
@OrderTop.mk _ _ (Top.mk _) le_enum_succ
#align ordinal.order_top_out_succ Ordinal.orderTopOutSucc
theorem enum_succ_eq_top {o : Ordinal} :
enum (· < ·) o
(by
rw [type_lt]
exact lt_succ o) =
(⊤ : (succ o).out.α) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top Ordinal.enum_succ_eq_top
theorem has_succ_of_type_succ_lt {α} {r : α → α → Prop} [wo : IsWellOrder α r]
(h : ∀ a < type r, succ a < type r) (x : α) : ∃ y, r x y := by
use enum r (succ (typein r x)) (h _ (typein_lt_type r x))
convert (enum_lt_enum (typein_lt_type r x)
(h _ (typein_lt_type r x))).mpr (lt_succ _); rw [enum_typein]
#align ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt Ordinal.has_succ_of_type_succ_lt
theorem out_no_max_of_succ_lt {o : Ordinal} (ho : ∀ a < o, succ a < o) : NoMaxOrder o.out.α :=
⟨has_succ_of_type_succ_lt (by rwa [type_lt])⟩
#align ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt Ordinal.out_no_max_of_succ_lt
theorem bounded_singleton {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (hr : (type r).IsLimit) (x) :
Bounded r {x} := by
refine ⟨enum r (succ (typein r x)) (hr.2 _ (typein_lt_type r x)), ?_⟩
intro b hb
rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 hb]
nth_rw 1 [← enum_typein r x]
rw [@enum_lt_enum _ r]
apply lt_succ
#align ordinal.bounded_singleton Ordinal.bounded_singleton
-- Porting note: `· < ·` requires a type ascription for an `IsWellOrder` instance.
theorem type_subrel_lt (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
type (Subrel ((· < ·) : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop) { o' : Ordinal | o' < o })
= Ordinal.lift.{u + 1} o := by
refine Quotient.inductionOn o ?_
rintro ⟨α, r, wo⟩; apply Quotient.sound
-- Porting note: `symm; refine' [term]` → `refine' [term].symm`
constructor; refine ((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (enumIso r).symm).symm
#align ordinal.type_subrel_lt Ordinal.type_subrel_lt
theorem mk_initialSeg (o : Ordinal.{u}) :
#{ o' : Ordinal | o' < o } = Cardinal.lift.{u + 1} o.card := by
rw [lift_card, ← type_subrel_lt, card_type]
#align ordinal.mk_initial_seg Ordinal.mk_initialSeg
/-! ### Normal ordinal functions -/
/-- A normal ordinal function is a strictly increasing function which is
order-continuous, i.e., the image `f o` of a limit ordinal `o` is the sup of `f a` for
`a < o`. -/
def IsNormal (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) : Prop :=
(∀ o, f o < f (succ o)) ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a
#align ordinal.is_normal Ordinal.IsNormal
theorem IsNormal.limit_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) :
∀ {o}, IsLimit o → ∀ {a}, f o ≤ a ↔ ∀ b < o, f b ≤ a :=
@H.2
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_le Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_le
theorem IsNormal.limit_lt {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (h : IsLimit o) {a} :
a < f o ↔ ∃ b < o, a < f b :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa only [exists_prop, not_exists, not_and, not_lt] using H.2 _ h a
#align ordinal.is_normal.limit_lt Ordinal.IsNormal.limit_lt
theorem IsNormal.strictMono {f} (H : IsNormal f) : StrictMono f := fun a b =>
limitRecOn b (Not.elim (not_lt_of_le <| Ordinal.zero_le _))
(fun _b IH h =>
(lt_or_eq_of_le (le_of_lt_succ h)).elim (fun h => (IH h).trans (H.1 _)) fun e => e ▸ H.1 _)
fun _b l _IH h => lt_of_lt_of_le (H.1 a) ((H.2 _ l _).1 le_rfl _ (l.2 _ h))
#align ordinal.is_normal.strict_mono Ordinal.IsNormal.strictMono
theorem IsNormal.monotone {f} (H : IsNormal f) : Monotone f :=
H.strictMono.monotone
#align ordinal.is_normal.monotone Ordinal.IsNormal.monotone
theorem isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit (f : Ordinal → Ordinal) :
IsNormal f ↔ StrictMono f ∧ ∀ o, IsLimit o → ∀ a, (∀ b < o, f b ≤ a) → f o ≤ a :=
⟨fun hf => ⟨hf.strictMono, fun a ha c => (hf.2 a ha c).2⟩, fun ⟨hs, hl⟩ =>
⟨fun a => hs (lt_succ a), fun a ha c =>
⟨fun hac _b hba => ((hs hba).trans_le hac).le, hl a ha c⟩⟩⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal_iff_strict_mono_limit Ordinal.isNormal_iff_strictMono_limit
theorem IsNormal.lt_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a < f b ↔ a < b :=
StrictMono.lt_iff_lt <| H.strictMono
#align ordinal.is_normal.lt_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.lt_iff
theorem IsNormal.le_iff {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a ≤ f b ↔ a ≤ b :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 H.lt_iff
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff
theorem IsNormal.inj {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a b} : f a = f b ↔ a = b := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, H.le_iff]
#align ordinal.is_normal.inj Ordinal.IsNormal.inj
theorem IsNormal.self_le {f} (H : IsNormal f) (a) : a ≤ f a :=
lt_wf.self_le_of_strictMono H.strictMono a
#align ordinal.is_normal.self_le Ordinal.IsNormal.self_le
theorem IsNormal.le_set {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set Ordinal) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f a ≤ o :=
⟨fun h a pa => (H.le_iff.2 ((H₂ _).1 le_rfl _ pa)).trans h, fun h => by
-- Porting note: `refine'` didn't work well so `induction` is used
induction b using limitRecOn with
| H₁ =>
cases' p0 with x px
have := Ordinal.le_zero.1 ((H₂ _).1 (Ordinal.zero_le _) _ px)
rw [this] at px
exact h _ px
| H₂ S _ =>
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ S).2 <| (lt_succ S).not_le) with ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| succ_le_of_lt <| not_le.1 h₂).trans (h _ h₁)
| H₃ S L _ =>
refine (H.2 _ L _).2 fun a h' => ?_
rcases not_forall₂.1 (mt (H₂ a).2 h'.not_le) with ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
exact (H.le_iff.2 <| (not_le.1 h₂).le).trans (h _ h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set
theorem IsNormal.le_set' {f o} (H : IsNormal f) (p : Set α) (p0 : p.Nonempty) (g : α → Ordinal) (b)
(H₂ : ∀ o, b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, g a ≤ o) : f b ≤ o ↔ ∀ a ∈ p, f (g a) ≤ o := by
simpa [H₂] using H.le_set (g '' p) (p0.image g) b
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_set' Ordinal.IsNormal.le_set'
theorem IsNormal.refl : IsNormal id :=
⟨lt_succ, fun _o l _a => Ordinal.limit_le l⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.refl Ordinal.IsNormal.refl
theorem IsNormal.trans {f g} (H₁ : IsNormal f) (H₂ : IsNormal g) : IsNormal (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun _x => H₁.lt_iff.2 (H₂.1 _), fun o l _a =>
H₁.le_set' (· < o) ⟨0, l.pos⟩ g _ fun _c => H₂.2 _ l _⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.trans Ordinal.IsNormal.trans
theorem IsNormal.isLimit {f} (H : IsNormal f) {o} (l : IsLimit o) : IsLimit (f o) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt <| H.lt_iff.2 l.pos, fun _ h =>
let ⟨_b, h₁, h₂⟩ := (H.limit_lt l).1 h
(succ_le_of_lt h₂).trans_lt (H.lt_iff.2 h₁)⟩
#align ordinal.is_normal.is_limit Ordinal.IsNormal.isLimit
theorem IsNormal.le_iff_eq {f} (H : IsNormal f) {a} : f a ≤ a ↔ f a = a :=
(H.self_le a).le_iff_eq
#align ordinal.is_normal.le_iff_eq Ordinal.IsNormal.le_iff_eq
theorem add_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a + b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a + b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (add_le_add_left l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
le_of_not_lt <| by
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
intro l
suffices ∀ x : β, Sum.Lex r s (Sum.inr x) (enum _ _ l) by
-- Porting note: `revert` & `intro` is required because `cases'` doesn't replace
-- `enum _ _ l` in `this`.
revert this; cases' enum _ _ l with x x <;> intro this
· cases this (enum s 0 h.pos)
· exact irrefl _ (this _)
intro x
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Sum.Lex r s), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s x))
rw [add_succ, succ_le_iff] at this
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨a | b, h⟩
· exact Sum.inl a
· exact Sum.inr ⟨b, by cases h; assumption⟩
· rcases a with ⟨a | a, h₁⟩ <;> rcases b with ⟨b | b, h₂⟩ <;> cases h₁ <;> cases h₂ <;>
rintro ⟨⟩ <;> constructor <;> assumption⟩
#align ordinal.add_le_of_limit Ordinal.add_le_of_limit
theorem add_isNormal (a : Ordinal) : IsNormal (a + ·) :=
⟨fun b => (add_lt_add_iff_left a).2 (lt_succ b), fun _b l _c => add_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.add_is_normal Ordinal.add_isNormal
theorem add_isLimit (a) {b} : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a + b) :=
(add_isNormal a).isLimit
#align ordinal.add_is_limit Ordinal.add_isLimit
alias IsLimit.add := add_isLimit
#align ordinal.is_limit.add Ordinal.IsLimit.add
/-! ### Subtraction on ordinals-/
/-- The set in the definition of subtraction is nonempty. -/
theorem sub_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} : { o | a ≤ b + o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, le_add_left _ _⟩
#align ordinal.sub_nonempty Ordinal.sub_nonempty
/-- `a - b` is the unique ordinal satisfying `b + (a - b) = a` when `b ≤ a`. -/
instance sub : Sub Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => sInf { o | a ≤ b + o }⟩
theorem le_add_sub (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + (a - b) :=
csInf_mem sub_nonempty
#align ordinal.le_add_sub Ordinal.le_add_sub
theorem sub_le {a b c : Ordinal} : a - b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b + c :=
⟨fun h => (le_add_sub a b).trans (add_le_add_left h _), fun h => csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.sub_le Ordinal.sub_le
theorem lt_sub {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b - c ↔ c + a < b :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le sub_le
#align ordinal.lt_sub Ordinal.lt_sub
theorem add_sub_cancel (a b : Ordinal) : a + b - a = b :=
le_antisymm (sub_le.2 <| le_rfl) ((add_le_add_iff_left a).1 <| le_add_sub _ _)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_cancel
theorem sub_eq_of_add_eq {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a + b = c) : c - a = b :=
h ▸ add_sub_cancel _ _
#align ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq Ordinal.sub_eq_of_add_eq
theorem sub_le_self (a b : Ordinal) : a - b ≤ a :=
sub_le.2 <| le_add_left _ _
#align ordinal.sub_le_self Ordinal.sub_le_self
protected theorem add_sub_cancel_of_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : b + (a - b) = a :=
(le_add_sub a b).antisymm'
(by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit (a - b) with (e | ⟨c, e⟩ | l)
· simp only [e, add_zero, h]
· rw [e, add_succ, succ_le_iff, ← lt_sub, e]
exact lt_succ c
· exact (add_le_of_limit l).2 fun c l => (lt_sub.1 l).le)
#align ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le
theorem le_sub_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : c ≤ a - b ↔ b + c ≤ a := by
rw [← add_le_add_iff_left b, Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h]
#align ordinal.le_sub_of_le Ordinal.le_sub_of_le
theorem sub_lt_of_le {a b c : Ordinal} (h : b ≤ a) : a - b < c ↔ a < b + c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le (le_sub_of_le h)
#align ordinal.sub_lt_of_le Ordinal.sub_lt_of_le
instance existsAddOfLE : ExistsAddOfLE Ordinal :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, (Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h).symm⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_zero (a : Ordinal) : a - 0 = a := by simpa only [zero_add] using add_sub_cancel 0 a
#align ordinal.sub_zero Ordinal.sub_zero
@[simp]
theorem zero_sub (a : Ordinal) : 0 - a = 0 := by rw [← Ordinal.le_zero]; apply sub_le_self
#align ordinal.zero_sub Ordinal.zero_sub
@[simp]
theorem sub_self (a : Ordinal) : a - a = 0 := by simpa only [add_zero] using add_sub_cancel a 0
#align ordinal.sub_self Ordinal.sub_self
protected theorem sub_eq_zero_iff_le {a b : Ordinal} : a - b = 0 ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [h, add_zero] using le_add_sub a b, fun h => by
rwa [← Ordinal.le_zero, sub_le, add_zero]⟩
#align ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le Ordinal.sub_eq_zero_iff_le
theorem sub_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a - b - c = a - (b + c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, sub_le, sub_le, add_assoc]
#align ordinal.sub_sub Ordinal.sub_sub
@[simp]
theorem add_sub_add_cancel (a b c : Ordinal) : a + b - (a + c) = b - c := by
rw [← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel]
#align ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel Ordinal.add_sub_add_cancel
theorem sub_isLimit {a b} (l : IsLimit a) (h : b < a) : IsLimit (a - b) :=
⟨ne_of_gt <| lt_sub.2 <| by rwa [add_zero], fun c h => by
rw [lt_sub, add_succ]; exact l.2 _ (lt_sub.1 h)⟩
#align ordinal.sub_is_limit Ordinal.sub_isLimit
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem one_add_omega : 1 + ω = ω := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_add_left _ _)
rw [omega, ← lift_one.{_, 0}, ← lift_add, lift_le, ← type_unit, ← type_sum_lex]
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.collapse (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_)⟩
· apply Sum.rec
· exact fun _ => 0
· exact Nat.succ
· intro a b
cases a <;> cases b <;> intro H <;> cases' H with _ _ H _ _ H <;>
[exact H.elim; exact Nat.succ_pos _; exact Nat.succ_lt_succ H]
#align ordinal.one_add_omega Ordinal.one_add_omega
@[simp]
theorem one_add_of_omega_le {o} (h : ω ≤ o) : 1 + o = o := by
rw [← Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le h, ← add_assoc, one_add_omega]
#align ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le Ordinal.one_add_of_omega_le
/-! ### Multiplication of ordinals-/
/-- The multiplication of ordinals `o₁` and `o₂` is the (well founded) lexicographic order on
`o₂ × o₁`. -/
instance monoid : Monoid Ordinal.{u} where
mul a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b
(fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ ⟨β, s, wo'⟩ => ⟦⟨β × α, Prod.Lex s r, inferInstance⟩⟧ :
WellOrder → WellOrder → Ordinal)
fun ⟨α₁, r₁, o₁⟩ ⟨α₂, r₂, o₂⟩ ⟨β₁, s₁, p₁⟩ ⟨β₂, s₂, p₂⟩ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.prodLexCongr g f⟩
one := 1
mul_assoc a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Eq.symm <|
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodAssoc _ _ _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨a₁, a₂⟩, a₃⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, b₃⟩
simp [Prod.lex_def, and_or_left, or_assoc, and_assoc]⟩⟩
mul_one a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨punitProd _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, a⟩; rcases b with ⟨⟨⟨⟩⟩, b⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, false_or_iff]
simp only [eq_self_iff_true, true_and_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
one_mul a :=
inductionOn a fun α r _ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨prodPUnit _, @fun a b => by
rcases a with ⟨a, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩; rcases b with ⟨b, ⟨⟨⟩⟩⟩
simp only [Prod.lex_def, EmptyRelation, and_false_iff, or_false_iff]
rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_prod_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Prod.Lex s r) = type r * type s :=
rfl
#align ordinal.type_prod_lex Ordinal.type_prod_lex
private theorem mul_eq_zero' {a b : Ordinal} : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 :=
inductionOn a fun α _ _ =>
inductionOn b fun β _ _ => by
simp_rw [← type_prod_lex, type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty]
rw [or_comm]
exact isEmpty_prod
instance monoidWithZero : MonoidWithZero Ordinal :=
{ Ordinal.monoid with
zero := 0
mul_zero := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inr rfl
zero_mul := fun _a => mul_eq_zero'.2 <| Or.inl rfl }
instance noZeroDivisors : NoZeroDivisors Ordinal :=
⟨fun {_ _} => mul_eq_zero'.1⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mul (a b : Ordinal.{v}) : lift.{u} (a * b) = lift.{u} a * lift.{u} b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_α, _r, _⟩ ⟨_β, _s, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _).trans
(RelIso.prodLexCongr (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift _)).symm⟩
#align ordinal.lift_mul Ordinal.lift_mul
@[simp]
theorem card_mul (a b) : card (a * b) = card a * card b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨α, _r, _⟩ ⟨β, _s, _⟩ => mul_comm #β #α
#align ordinal.card_mul Ordinal.card_mul
instance leftDistribClass : LeftDistribClass Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun a b c =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quotient.sound
⟨⟨sumProdDistrib _ _ _, by
rintro ⟨a₁ | a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨b₁ | b₁, b₂⟩ <;>
simp only [Prod.lex_def, Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl,
Sum.lex_inr_inr, sumProdDistrib_apply_left, sumProdDistrib_apply_right] <;>
-- Porting note: `Sum.inr.inj_iff` is required.
simp only [Sum.inl.inj_iff, Sum.inr.inj_iff,
true_or_iff, false_and_iff, false_or_iff]⟩⟩⟩
theorem mul_succ (a b : Ordinal) : a * succ b = a * b + a :=
mul_add_one a b
#align ordinal.mul_succ Ordinal.mul_succ
instance mul_covariantClass_le : CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (· * ·) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : α × γ => (f a.1, a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ h'⟩
#align ordinal.mul_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_covariantClass_le
instance mul_swap_covariantClass_le :
CovariantClass Ordinal.{u} Ordinal.{u} (swap (· * ·)) (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨fun c a b =>
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ => by
refine
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a : γ × α => (a.1, f a.2)) fun a b h => ?_).ordinal_type_le
cases' h with a₁ b₁ a₂ b₂ h' a b₁ b₂ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.left _ _ h'
· exact Prod.Lex.right _ (f.toRelEmbedding.map_rel_iff.2 h')⟩
#align ordinal.mul_swap_covariant_class_le Ordinal.mul_swap_covariantClass_le
theorem le_mul_left (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ a * b := by
convert mul_le_mul_left' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [mul_one a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_left Ordinal.le_mul_left
theorem le_mul_right (a : Ordinal) {b : Ordinal} (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ b * a := by
convert mul_le_mul_right' (one_le_iff_pos.2 hb) a
rw [one_mul a]
#align ordinal.le_mul_right Ordinal.le_mul_right
private theorem mul_le_of_limit_aux {α β r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] {c}
(h : IsLimit (type s)) (H : ∀ b' < type s, type r * b' ≤ c) (l : c < type r * type s) :
False := by
suffices ∀ a b, Prod.Lex s r (b, a) (enum _ _ l) by
cases' enum _ _ l with b a
exact irrefl _ (this _ _)
intro a b
rw [← typein_lt_typein (Prod.Lex s r), typein_enum]
have := H _ (h.2 _ (typein_lt_type s b))
rw [mul_succ] at this
have := ((add_lt_add_iff_left _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a)).trans_le this
refine (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (fun a => ?_) fun a b => ?_).ordinal_type_le.trans_lt this
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b', a'⟩, h⟩
by_cases e : b = b'
· refine Sum.inr ⟨a', ?_⟩
subst e
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact (irrefl _ h).elim
· exact h
· refine Sum.inl (⟨b', ?_⟩, a')
cases' h with _ _ _ _ h _ _ _ h
· exact h
· exact (e rfl).elim
· rcases a with ⟨⟨b₁, a₁⟩, h₁⟩
rcases b with ⟨⟨b₂, a₂⟩, h₂⟩
intro h
by_cases e₁ : b = b₁ <;> by_cases e₂ : b = b₂
· substs b₁ b₂
simpa only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, @irrefl _ s _ b, true_and_iff, false_or_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, dif_pos, Sum.lex_inr_inr] using h
· subst b₁
simp only [subrel_val, Prod.lex_def, e₂, Prod.lex_def, dif_pos, subrel_val, eq_self_iff_true,
or_false_iff, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Sum.lex_inr_inl, false_and_iff] at h ⊢
cases' h₂ with _ _ _ _ h₂_h h₂_h <;> [exact asymm h h₂_h; exact e₂ rfl]
-- Porting note: `cc` hadn't ported yet.
· simp [e₂, dif_neg e₁, show b₂ ≠ b₁ from e₂ ▸ e₁]
· simpa only [dif_neg e₁, dif_neg e₂, Prod.lex_def, subrel_val, Subtype.mk_eq_mk,
Sum.lex_inl_inl] using h
theorem mul_le_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit b) : a * b ≤ c ↔ ∀ b' < b, a * b' ≤ c :=
⟨fun h b' l => (mul_le_mul_left' l.le _).trans h, fun H =>
-- Porting note: `induction` tactics are required because of the parser bug.
le_of_not_lt <| by
induction a using inductionOn with
| H α r =>
induction b using inductionOn with
| H β s =>
exact mul_le_of_limit_aux h H⟩
#align ordinal.mul_le_of_limit Ordinal.mul_le_of_limit
theorem mul_isNormal {a : Ordinal} (h : 0 < a) : IsNormal (a * ·) :=
-- Porting note(#12129): additional beta reduction needed
⟨fun b => by
beta_reduce
rw [mul_succ]
simpa only [add_zero] using (add_lt_add_iff_left (a * b)).2 h,
fun b l c => mul_le_of_limit l⟩
#align ordinal.mul_is_normal Ordinal.mul_isNormal
theorem lt_mul_of_limit {a b c : Ordinal} (h : IsLimit c) : a < b * c ↔ ∃ c' < c, a < b * c' := by
-- Porting note: `bex_def` is required.
simpa only [not_forall₂, not_le, bex_def] using not_congr (@mul_le_of_limit b c a h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit Ordinal.lt_mul_of_limit
theorem mul_lt_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b < a * c ↔ b < c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).lt_iff
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_le_mul_iff_left {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b ≤ a * c ↔ b ≤ c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).le_iff
#align ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left Ordinal.mul_le_mul_iff_left
theorem mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a < b) (c0 : 0 < c) : c * a < c * b :=
(mul_lt_mul_iff_left c0).2 h
#align ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left Ordinal.mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
theorem mul_pos {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : 0 < a) (h₂ : 0 < b) : 0 < a * b := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h₂ h₁
#align ordinal.mul_pos Ordinal.mul_pos
theorem mul_ne_zero {a b : Ordinal} : a ≠ 0 → b ≠ 0 → a * b ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero] using mul_pos
#align ordinal.mul_ne_zero Ordinal.mul_ne_zero
theorem le_of_mul_le_mul_left {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c * a ≤ c * b) (h0 : 0 < c) : a ≤ b :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (fun h' => mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left h' h0) h
#align ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left Ordinal.le_of_mul_le_mul_left
theorem mul_right_inj {a b c : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : a * b = a * c ↔ b = c :=
(mul_isNormal a0).inj
#align ordinal.mul_right_inj Ordinal.mul_right_inj
theorem mul_isLimit {a b : Ordinal} (a0 : 0 < a) : IsLimit b → IsLimit (a * b) :=
(mul_isNormal a0).isLimit
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit Ordinal.mul_isLimit
theorem mul_isLimit_left {a b : Ordinal} (l : IsLimit a) (b0 : 0 < b) : IsLimit (a * b) := by
rcases zero_or_succ_or_limit b with (rfl | ⟨b, rfl⟩ | lb)
· exact b0.false.elim
· rw [mul_succ]
exact add_isLimit _ l
· exact mul_isLimit l.pos lb
#align ordinal.mul_is_limit_left Ordinal.mul_isLimit_left
theorem smul_eq_mul : ∀ (n : ℕ) (a : Ordinal), n • a = a * n
| 0, a => by rw [zero_nsmul, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero]
| n + 1, a => by rw [succ_nsmul, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, Nat.cast_one, mul_one, smul_eq_mul n]
#align ordinal.smul_eq_mul Ordinal.smul_eq_mul
/-! ### Division on ordinals -/
/-- The set in the definition of division is nonempty. -/
theorem div_nonempty {a b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : { o | a < b * succ o }.Nonempty :=
⟨a, (succ_le_iff (a := a) (b := b * succ a)).1 <| by
simpa only [succ_zero, one_mul] using
mul_le_mul_right' (succ_le_of_lt (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)) (succ a)⟩
#align ordinal.div_nonempty Ordinal.div_nonempty
/-- `a / b` is the unique ordinal `o` satisfying `a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance div : Div Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => if _h : b = 0 then 0 else sInf { o | a < b * succ o }⟩
@[simp]
theorem div_zero (a : Ordinal) : a / 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
#align ordinal.div_zero Ordinal.div_zero
theorem div_def (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b = sInf { o | a < b * succ o } :=
dif_neg h
#align ordinal.div_def Ordinal.div_def
theorem lt_mul_succ_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * succ (a / b) := by
rw [div_def a h]; exact csInf_mem (div_nonempty h)
#align ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div Ordinal.lt_mul_succ_div
theorem lt_mul_div_add (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a < b * (a / b) + b := by
simpa only [mul_succ] using lt_mul_succ_div a h
#align ordinal.lt_mul_div_add Ordinal.lt_mul_div_add
theorem div_le {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b ≤ c ↔ a < b * succ c :=
⟨fun h => (lt_mul_succ_div a b0).trans_le (mul_le_mul_left' (succ_le_succ_iff.2 h) _), fun h => by
rw [div_def a b0]; exact csInf_le' h⟩
#align ordinal.div_le Ordinal.div_le
theorem lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : a < b / c ↔ c * succ a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_le, div_le h, not_lt]
#align ordinal.lt_div Ordinal.lt_div
theorem div_pos {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ≠ 0) : 0 < b / c ↔ c ≤ b := by simp [lt_div h]
#align ordinal.div_pos Ordinal.div_pos
theorem le_div {a b c : Ordinal} (c0 : c ≠ 0) : a ≤ b / c ↔ c * a ≤ b := by
induction a using limitRecOn with
| H₁ => simp only [mul_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
| H₂ _ _ => rw [succ_le_iff, lt_div c0]
| H₃ _ h₁ h₂ =>
revert h₁ h₂
simp (config := { contextual := true }) only [mul_le_of_limit, limit_le, iff_self_iff,
forall_true_iff]
#align ordinal.le_div Ordinal.le_div
theorem div_lt {a b c : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : a / b < c ↔ a < b * c :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_div b0
#align ordinal.div_lt Ordinal.div_lt
theorem div_le_of_le_mul {a b c : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b * c) : a / b ≤ c :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, div_zero, Ordinal.zero_le]
else
(div_le b0).2 <| h.trans_lt <| mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left (lt_succ c) (Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 b0)
#align ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul Ordinal.div_le_of_le_mul
theorem mul_lt_of_lt_div {a b c : Ordinal} : a < b / c → c * a < b :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le div_le_of_le_mul
#align ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div Ordinal.mul_lt_of_lt_div
@[simp]
theorem zero_div (a : Ordinal) : 0 / a = 0 :=
Ordinal.le_zero.1 <| div_le_of_le_mul <| Ordinal.zero_le _
#align ordinal.zero_div Ordinal.zero_div
theorem mul_div_le (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) ≤ a :=
if b0 : b = 0 then by simp only [b0, zero_mul, Ordinal.zero_le] else (le_div b0).1 le_rfl
#align ordinal.mul_div_le Ordinal.mul_div_le
theorem mul_add_div (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) (c) : (b * a + c) / b = a + c / b := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply (div_le b0).2
rw [mul_succ, mul_add, add_assoc, add_lt_add_iff_left]
apply lt_mul_div_add _ b0
· rw [le_div b0, mul_add, add_le_add_iff_left]
apply mul_div_le
#align ordinal.mul_add_div Ordinal.mul_add_div
theorem div_eq_zero_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a / b = 0 := by
rw [← Ordinal.le_zero, div_le <| Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero.1 <| (Ordinal.zero_le _).trans_lt h]
simpa only [succ_zero, mul_one] using h
#align ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt Ordinal.div_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem mul_div_cancel (a) {b : Ordinal} (b0 : b ≠ 0) : b * a / b = a := by
simpa only [add_zero, zero_div] using mul_add_div a b0 0
#align ordinal.mul_div_cancel Ordinal.mul_div_cancel
@[simp]
theorem div_one (a : Ordinal) : a / 1 = a := by
simpa only [one_mul] using mul_div_cancel a Ordinal.one_ne_zero
#align ordinal.div_one Ordinal.div_one
@[simp]
theorem div_self {a : Ordinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / a = 1 := by
simpa only [mul_one] using mul_div_cancel 1 h
#align ordinal.div_self Ordinal.div_self
theorem mul_sub (a b c : Ordinal) : a * (b - c) = a * b - a * c :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mul, sub_self]
else
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by rw [sub_le, ← le_div a0, sub_le, ← le_div a0, mul_add_div _ a0]
#align ordinal.mul_sub Ordinal.mul_sub
theorem isLimit_add_iff {a b} : IsLimit (a + b) ↔ IsLimit b ∨ b = 0 ∧ IsLimit a := by
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases h' : b = 0
· rw [h', add_zero] at h
right
exact ⟨h', h⟩
left
rw [← add_sub_cancel a b]
apply sub_isLimit h
suffices a + 0 < a + b by simpa only [add_zero] using this
rwa [add_lt_add_iff_left, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
rcases h with (h | ⟨rfl, h⟩)
· exact add_isLimit a h
· simpa only [add_zero]
#align ordinal.is_limit_add_iff Ordinal.isLimit_add_iff
theorem dvd_add_iff : ∀ {a b c : Ordinal}, a ∣ b → (a ∣ b + c ↔ a ∣ c)
| a, _, c, ⟨b, rfl⟩ =>
⟨fun ⟨d, e⟩ => ⟨d - b, by rw [mul_sub, ← e, add_sub_cancel]⟩, fun ⟨d, e⟩ => by
rw [e, ← mul_add]
apply dvd_mul_right⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_add_iff Ordinal.dvd_add_iff
theorem div_mul_cancel : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, a ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a * (b / a) = b
| a, _, a0, ⟨b, rfl⟩ => by rw [mul_div_cancel _ a0]
#align ordinal.div_mul_cancel Ordinal.div_mul_cancel
theorem le_of_dvd : ∀ {a b : Ordinal}, b ≠ 0 → a ∣ b → a ≤ b
-- Porting note: `⟨b, rfl⟩ => by` → `⟨b, e⟩ => by subst e`
| a, _, b0, ⟨b, e⟩ => by
subst e
-- Porting note: `Ne` is required.
simpa only [mul_one] using
mul_le_mul_left'
(one_le_iff_ne_zero.2 fun h : b = 0 => by
simp only [h, mul_zero, Ne, not_true_eq_false] at b0) a
#align ordinal.le_of_dvd Ordinal.le_of_dvd
theorem dvd_antisymm {a b : Ordinal} (h₁ : a ∣ b) (h₂ : b ∣ a) : a = b :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by subst a; exact (eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₁).symm
else
if b0 : b = 0 then by subst b; exact eq_zero_of_zero_dvd h₂
else (le_of_dvd b0 h₁).antisymm (le_of_dvd a0 h₂)
#align ordinal.dvd_antisymm Ordinal.dvd_antisymm
instance isAntisymm : IsAntisymm Ordinal (· ∣ ·) :=
⟨@dvd_antisymm⟩
/-- `a % b` is the unique ordinal `o'` satisfying
`a = b * o + o'` with `o' < b`. -/
instance mod : Mod Ordinal :=
⟨fun a b => a - b * (a / b)⟩
theorem mod_def (a b : Ordinal) : a % b = a - b * (a / b) :=
rfl
#align ordinal.mod_def Ordinal.mod_def
theorem mod_le (a b : Ordinal) : a % b ≤ a :=
sub_le_self a _
#align ordinal.mod_le Ordinal.mod_le
@[simp]
theorem mod_zero (a : Ordinal) : a % 0 = a := by simp only [mod_def, div_zero, zero_mul, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_zero Ordinal.mod_zero
theorem mod_eq_of_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a % b = a := by
simp only [mod_def, div_eq_zero_of_lt h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt Ordinal.mod_eq_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem zero_mod (b : Ordinal) : 0 % b = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, zero_div, mul_zero, sub_self]
#align ordinal.zero_mod Ordinal.zero_mod
theorem div_add_mod (a b : Ordinal) : b * (a / b) + a % b = a :=
Ordinal.add_sub_cancel_of_le <| mul_div_le _ _
#align ordinal.div_add_mod Ordinal.div_add_mod
theorem mod_lt (a) {b : Ordinal} (h : b ≠ 0) : a % b < b :=
(add_lt_add_iff_left (b * (a / b))).1 <| by rw [div_add_mod]; exact lt_mul_div_add a h
#align ordinal.mod_lt Ordinal.mod_lt
@[simp]
theorem mod_self (a : Ordinal) : a % a = 0 :=
if a0 : a = 0 then by simp only [a0, zero_mod]
else by simp only [mod_def, div_self a0, mul_one, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_self Ordinal.mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mod_one (a : Ordinal) : a % 1 = 0 := by simp only [mod_def, div_one, one_mul, sub_self]
#align ordinal.mod_one Ordinal.mod_one
theorem dvd_of_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} (H : a % b = 0) : b ∣ a :=
⟨a / b, by simpa [H] using (div_add_mod a b).symm⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_of_mod_eq_zero
theorem mod_eq_zero_of_dvd {a b : Ordinal} (H : b ∣ a) : a % b = 0 := by
rcases H with ⟨c, rfl⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb)
· simp
· simp [mod_def, hb]
#align ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_eq_zero_of_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : b ∣ a ↔ a % b = 0 :=
⟨mod_eq_zero_of_dvd, dvd_of_mod_eq_zero⟩
#align ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero Ordinal.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem mul_add_mod_self (x y z : Ordinal) : (x * y + z) % x = z % x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp
· rwa [mod_def, mul_add_div, mul_add, ← sub_sub, add_sub_cancel, mod_def]
#align ordinal.mul_add_mod_self Ordinal.mul_add_mod_self
@[simp]
theorem mul_mod (x y : Ordinal) : x * y % x = 0 := by
simpa using mul_add_mod_self x y 0
#align ordinal.mul_mod Ordinal.mul_mod
theorem mod_mod_of_dvd (a : Ordinal) {b c : Ordinal} (h : c ∣ b) : a % b % c = a % c := by
nth_rw 2 [← div_add_mod a b]
rcases h with ⟨d, rfl⟩
rw [mul_assoc, mul_add_mod_self]
#align ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd Ordinal.mod_mod_of_dvd
@[simp]
theorem mod_mod (a b : Ordinal) : a % b % b = a % b :=
mod_mod_of_dvd a dvd_rfl
#align ordinal.mod_mod Ordinal.mod_mod
/-! ### Families of ordinals
There are two kinds of indexed families that naturally arise when dealing with ordinals: those
indexed by some type in the appropriate universe, and those indexed by ordinals less than another.
The following API allows one to convert from one kind of family to the other.
In many cases, this makes it easy to prove claims about one kind of family via the corresponding
claim on the other. -/
/-- Converts a family indexed by a `Type u` to one indexed by an `Ordinal.{u}` using a specified
well-ordering. -/
def bfamilyOfFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) :
∀ a < type r, α := fun a ha => f (enum r a ha)
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family' Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily'
/-- Converts a family indexed by a `Type u` to one indexed by an `Ordinal.{u}` using a well-ordering
given by the axiom of choice. -/
def bfamilyOfFamily {ι : Type u} : (ι → α) → ∀ a < type (@WellOrderingRel ι), α :=
bfamilyOfFamily' WellOrderingRel
#align ordinal.bfamily_of_family Ordinal.bfamilyOfFamily
/-- Converts a family indexed by an `Ordinal.{u}` to one indexed by a `Type u` using a specified
well-ordering. -/
def familyOfBFamily' {ι : Type u} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] {o} (ho : type r = o)
(f : ∀ a < o, α) : ι → α := fun i =>
f (typein r i)
(by
rw [← ho]
exact typein_lt_type r i)
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily' Ordinal.familyOfBFamily'
/-- Converts a family indexed by an `Ordinal.{u}` to one indexed by a `Type u` using a well-ordering
given by the axiom of choice. -/
def familyOfBFamily (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ a < o, α) : o.out.α → α :=
familyOfBFamily' (· < ·) (type_lt o) f
#align ordinal.family_of_bfamily Ordinal.familyOfBFamily
@[simp]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean | 1,137 | 1,139 | theorem bfamilyOfFamily'_typein {ι} (r : ι → ι → Prop) [IsWellOrder ι r] (f : ι → α) (i) :
bfamilyOfFamily' r f (typein r i) (typein_lt_type r i) = f i := by |
simp only [bfamilyOfFamily', enum_typein]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.oriented.rotation from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f0c8bf9245297a541f468be517f1bde6195105e9"
/-!
# Rotations by oriented angles.
This file defines rotations by oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.rotation` is the rotation by an oriented angle with respect to an orientation.
-/
noncomputable section
open FiniteDimensional Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
/-- Auxiliary construction to build a rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
#align orientation.rotation_aux Orientation.rotationAux
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_aux_apply Orientation.rotationAux_apply
/-- A rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply, ← mul_smul, add_smul,
smul_add, smul_neg, smul_sub, mul_comm, sq]
abel
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply,
add_smul, smul_neg, smul_sub, smul_smul]
ring_nf
abel
· simp)
#align orientation.rotation Orientation.rotation
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_apply Orientation.rotation_apply
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
#align orientation.rotation_symm_apply Orientation.rotation_symm_apply
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
#align orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_to_lin Orientation.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear map) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V :=
FiniteDimensional.nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
#align orientation.det_rotation Orientation.det_rotation
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear equiv) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
#align orientation.linear_equiv_det_rotation Orientation.linearEquiv_det_rotation
/-- The inverse of `rotation` is rotation by the negation of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
#align orientation.rotation_symm Orientation.rotation_symm
/-- Rotation by 0 is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_zero Orientation.rotation_zero
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi Orientation.rotation_pi
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by simp
#align orientation.rotation_pi_apply Orientation.rotation_pi_apply
/-- Rotation by π / 2 is the "right-angle-rotation" map `J`. -/
theorem rotation_pi_div_two : o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) = J := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
#align orientation.rotation_pi_div_two Orientation.rotation_pi_div_two
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_rotation (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ₁ (o.rotation θ₂ x) = o.rotation (θ₁ + θ₂) x := by
simp only [o.rotation_apply, ← mul_smul, Real.Angle.cos_add, Real.Angle.sin_add, add_smul,
sub_smul, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply, smul_add, LinearIsometryEquiv.map_add,
LinearIsometryEquiv.map_smul, rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, smul_neg]
ring_nf
abel
#align orientation.rotation_rotation Orientation.rotation_rotation
/-- Rotating twice is equivalent to rotating by the sum of the angles. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_trans (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) :
(o.rotation θ₁).trans (o.rotation θ₂) = o.rotation (θ₂ + θ₁) :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ext fun _ => by rw [← rotation_rotation, LinearIsometryEquiv.trans_apply]
#align orientation.rotation_trans Orientation.rotation_trans
/-- Rotating the first of two vectors by `θ` scales their Kahler form by `cos θ - sin θ * I`. -/
@[simp]
theorem kahler_rotation_left (x y : V) (θ : Real.Angle) :
o.kahler (o.rotation θ x) y = conj (θ.expMapCircle : ℂ) * o.kahler x y := by
-- Porting note: this needed the `Complex.conj_ofReal` instead of `RCLike.conj_ofReal`;
-- I believe this is because the respective coercions are no longer defeq, and
-- `Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle` uses the `Complex` version.
simp only [o.rotation_apply, map_add, map_mul, LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply,
LinearMap.add_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, real_smul, kahler_rightAngleRotation_left,
Real.Angle.coe_expMapCircle, Complex.conj_ofReal, conj_I]
ring
#align orientation.kahler_rotation_left Orientation.kahler_rotation_left
/-- Negating a rotation is equivalent to rotation by π plus the angle. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 192 | 193 | theorem neg_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) : -o.rotation θ x = o.rotation (π + θ) x := by |
rw [← o.rotation_pi_apply, rotation_rotation]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Bounded
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneConvergence
#align_import analysis.box_integral.box.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`
In this file we define rectangular boxes in `ℝⁿ`. As usual, we represent `ℝⁿ` as the type of
functions `ι → ℝ` (usually `ι = Fin n` for some `n`). When we need to interpret a box `[l, u]` as a
set, we use the product `{x | ∀ i, l i < x i ∧ x i ≤ u i}` of half-open intervals `(l i, u i]`. We
exclude `l i` because this way boxes of a partition are disjoint as sets in `ℝⁿ`.
Currently, the only use cases for these constructions are the definitions of Riemann-style integrals
(Riemann, Henstock-Kurzweil, McShane).
## Main definitions
We use the same structure `BoxIntegral.Box` both for ambient boxes and for elements of a partition.
Each box is stored as two points `lower upper : ι → ℝ` and a proof of `∀ i, lower i < upper i`. We
define instances `Membership (ι → ℝ) (Box ι)` and `CoeTC (Box ι) (Set <| ι → ℝ)` so that each box is
interpreted as the set `{x | ∀ i, x i ∈ Set.Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)}`. This way boxes of a
partition are pairwise disjoint and their union is exactly the original box.
We require boxes to be nonempty, because this way coercion to sets is injective. The empty box can
be represented as `⊥ : WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`.
We define the following operations on boxes:
* coercion to `Set (ι → ℝ)` and `Membership (ι → ℝ) (BoxIntegral.Box ι)` as described above;
* `PartialOrder` and `SemilatticeSup` instances such that `I ≤ J` is equivalent to
`(I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J`;
* `Lattice` instances on `WithBot (BoxIntegral.Box ι)`;
* `BoxIntegral.Box.Icc`: the closed box `Set.Icc I.lower I.upper`; defined as a bundled monotone
map from `Box ι` to `Set (ι → ℝ)`;
* `BoxIntegral.Box.face I i : Box (Fin n)`: a hyperface of `I : BoxIntegral.Box (Fin (n + 1))`;
* `BoxIntegral.Box.distortion`: the maximal ratio of two lengths of edges of a box; defined as the
supremum of `nndist I.lower I.upper / nndist (I.lower i) (I.upper i)`.
We also provide a convenience constructor `BoxIntegral.Box.mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι)`
that returns the box `⟨l, u, _⟩` if it is nonempty and `⊥` otherwise.
## Tags
rectangular box
-/
open Set Function Metric Filter
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open NNReal Topology
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*}
/-!
### Rectangular box: definition and partial order
-/
/-- A nontrivial rectangular box in `ι → ℝ` with corners `lower` and `upper`. Represents the product
of half-open intervals `(lower i, upper i]`. -/
structure Box (ι : Type*) where
/-- coordinates of the lower and upper corners of the box -/
(lower upper : ι → ℝ)
/-- Each lower coordinate is less than its upper coordinate: i.e., the box is non-empty -/
lower_lt_upper : ∀ i, lower i < upper i
#align box_integral.box BoxIntegral.Box
attribute [simp] Box.lower_lt_upper
namespace Box
variable (I J : Box ι) {x y : ι → ℝ}
instance : Inhabited (Box ι) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun _ ↦ zero_lt_one⟩⟩
theorem lower_le_upper : I.lower ≤ I.upper :=
fun i ↦ (I.lower_lt_upper i).le
#align box_integral.box.lower_le_upper BoxIntegral.Box.lower_le_upper
theorem lower_ne_upper (i) : I.lower i ≠ I.upper i :=
(I.lower_lt_upper i).ne
#align box_integral.box.lower_ne_upper BoxIntegral.Box.lower_ne_upper
instance : Membership (ι → ℝ) (Box ι) :=
⟨fun x I ↦ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)⟩
-- Porting note: added
/-- The set of points in this box: this is the product of half-open intervals `(lower i, upper i]`,
where `lower` and `upper` are this box' corners. -/
@[coe]
def toSet (I : Box ι) : Set (ι → ℝ) := { x | x ∈ I }
instance : CoeTC (Box ι) (Set <| ι → ℝ) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {l u x : ι → ℝ} {H} : x ∈ mk l u H ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i) := Iff.rfl
#align box_integral.box.mem_mk BoxIntegral.Box.mem_mk
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe : x ∈ (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ↔ x ∈ I := Iff.rfl
#align box_integral.box.mem_coe BoxIntegral.Box.mem_coe
theorem mem_def : x ∈ I ↔ ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i) := Iff.rfl
#align box_integral.box.mem_def BoxIntegral.Box.mem_def
theorem mem_univ_Ioc {I : Box ι} : (x ∈ pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i)) ↔ x ∈ I :=
mem_univ_pi
#align box_integral.box.mem_univ_Ioc BoxIntegral.Box.mem_univ_Ioc
theorem coe_eq_pi : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ mem_univ_Ioc.symm
#align box_integral.box.coe_eq_pi BoxIntegral.Box.coe_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem upper_mem : I.upper ∈ I :=
fun i ↦ right_mem_Ioc.2 <| I.lower_lt_upper i
#align box_integral.box.upper_mem BoxIntegral.Box.upper_mem
theorem exists_mem : ∃ x, x ∈ I :=
⟨_, I.upper_mem⟩
#align box_integral.box.exists_mem BoxIntegral.Box.exists_mem
theorem nonempty_coe : Set.Nonempty (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) :=
I.exists_mem
#align box_integral.box.nonempty_coe BoxIntegral.Box.nonempty_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_ne_empty : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ≠ ∅ :=
I.nonempty_coe.ne_empty
#align box_integral.box.coe_ne_empty BoxIntegral.Box.coe_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ne_coe : ∅ ≠ (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) :=
I.coe_ne_empty.symm
#align box_integral.box.empty_ne_coe BoxIntegral.Box.empty_ne_coe
instance : LE (Box ι) :=
⟨fun I J ↦ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ I → x ∈ J⟩
theorem le_def : I ≤ J ↔ ∀ x ∈ I, x ∈ J := Iff.rfl
#align box_integral.box.le_def BoxIntegral.Box.le_def
theorem le_TFAE : List.TFAE [I ≤ J, (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J,
Icc I.lower I.upper ⊆ Icc J.lower J.upper, J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2
· exact Iff.rfl
tfae_have 2 → 3
· intro h
simpa [coe_eq_pi, closure_pi_set, lower_ne_upper] using closure_mono h
tfae_have 3 ↔ 4
· exact Icc_subset_Icc_iff I.lower_le_upper
tfae_have 4 → 2
· exact fun h x hx i ↦ Ioc_subset_Ioc (h.1 i) (h.2 i) (hx i)
tfae_finish
#align box_integral.box.le_tfae BoxIntegral.Box.le_TFAE
variable {I J}
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset_coe : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J := Iff.rfl
#align box_integral.box.coe_subset_coe BoxIntegral.Box.coe_subset_coe
theorem le_iff_bounds : I ≤ J ↔ J.lower ≤ I.lower ∧ I.upper ≤ J.upper :=
(le_TFAE I J).out 0 3
#align box_integral.box.le_iff_bounds BoxIntegral.Box.le_iff_bounds
theorem injective_coe : Injective ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)) := by
rintro ⟨l₁, u₁, h₁⟩ ⟨l₂, u₂, h₂⟩ h
simp only [Subset.antisymm_iff, coe_subset_coe, le_iff_bounds] at h
congr
exacts [le_antisymm h.2.1 h.1.1, le_antisymm h.1.2 h.2.2]
#align box_integral.box.injective_coe BoxIntegral.Box.injective_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J :=
injective_coe.eq_iff
#align box_integral.box.coe_inj BoxIntegral.Box.coe_inj
@[ext]
theorem ext (H : ∀ x, x ∈ I ↔ x ∈ J) : I = J :=
injective_coe <| Set.ext H
#align box_integral.box.ext BoxIntegral.Box.ext
theorem ne_of_disjoint_coe (h : Disjoint (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) J) : I ≠ J :=
mt coe_inj.2 <| h.ne I.coe_ne_empty
#align box_integral.box.ne_of_disjoint_coe BoxIntegral.Box.ne_of_disjoint_coe
instance : PartialOrder (Box ι) :=
{ PartialOrder.lift ((↑) : Box ι → Set (ι → ℝ)) injective_coe with le := (· ≤ ·) }
/-- Closed box corresponding to `I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`. -/
protected def Icc : Box ι ↪o Set (ι → ℝ) :=
OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff (fun I : Box ι ↦ Icc I.lower I.upper) fun I J ↦ (le_TFAE I J).out 2 0
#align box_integral.box.Icc BoxIntegral.Box.Icc
theorem Icc_def : Box.Icc I = Icc I.lower I.upper := rfl
#align box_integral.box.Icc_def BoxIntegral.Box.Icc_def
@[simp]
theorem upper_mem_Icc (I : Box ι) : I.upper ∈ Box.Icc I :=
right_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
#align box_integral.box.upper_mem_Icc BoxIntegral.Box.upper_mem_Icc
@[simp]
theorem lower_mem_Icc (I : Box ι) : I.lower ∈ Box.Icc I :=
left_mem_Icc.2 I.lower_le_upper
#align box_integral.box.lower_mem_Icc BoxIntegral.Box.lower_mem_Icc
protected theorem isCompact_Icc (I : Box ι) : IsCompact (Box.Icc I) :=
isCompact_Icc
#align box_integral.box.is_compact_Icc BoxIntegral.Box.isCompact_Icc
theorem Icc_eq_pi : Box.Icc I = pi univ fun i ↦ Icc (I.lower i) (I.upper i) :=
(pi_univ_Icc _ _).symm
#align box_integral.box.Icc_eq_pi BoxIntegral.Box.Icc_eq_pi
theorem le_iff_Icc : I ≤ J ↔ Box.Icc I ⊆ Box.Icc J :=
(le_TFAE I J).out 0 2
#align box_integral.box.le_iff_Icc BoxIntegral.Box.le_iff_Icc
theorem antitone_lower : Antitone fun I : Box ι ↦ I.lower :=
fun _ _ H ↦ (le_iff_bounds.1 H).1
#align box_integral.box.antitone_lower BoxIntegral.Box.antitone_lower
theorem monotone_upper : Monotone fun I : Box ι ↦ I.upper :=
fun _ _ H ↦ (le_iff_bounds.1 H).2
#align box_integral.box.monotone_upper BoxIntegral.Box.monotone_upper
theorem coe_subset_Icc : ↑I ⊆ Box.Icc I :=
fun _ hx ↦ ⟨fun i ↦ (hx i).1.le, fun i ↦ (hx i).2⟩
#align box_integral.box.coe_subset_Icc BoxIntegral.Box.coe_subset_Icc
/-!
### Supremum of two boxes
-/
/-- `I ⊔ J` is the least box that includes both `I` and `J`. Since `↑I ∪ ↑J` is usually not a box,
`↑(I ⊔ J)` is larger than `↑I ∪ ↑J`. -/
instance : Sup (Box ι) :=
⟨fun I J ↦ ⟨I.lower ⊓ J.lower, I.upper ⊔ J.upper,
fun i ↦ (min_le_left _ _).trans_lt <| (I.lower_lt_upper i).trans_le (le_max_left _ _)⟩⟩
instance : SemilatticeSup (Box ι) :=
{ (inferInstance : PartialOrder (Box ι)),
(inferInstance : Sup (Box ι)) with
le_sup_left := fun _ _ ↦ le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_left, le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ ↦ le_iff_bounds.2 ⟨inf_le_right, le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ ↦ le_iff_bounds.2
⟨le_inf (antitone_lower h₁) (antitone_lower h₂),
sup_le (monotone_upper h₁) (monotone_upper h₂)⟩ }
/-!
### `WithBot (Box ι)`
In this section we define coercion from `WithBot (Box ι)` to `Set (ι → ℝ)` by sending `⊥` to `∅`.
-/
-- Porting note: added
/-- The set underlying this box: `⊥` is mapped to `∅`. -/
@[coe]
def withBotToSet (o : WithBot (Box ι)) : Set (ι → ℝ) := o.elim ∅ (↑)
instance withBotCoe : CoeTC (WithBot (Box ι)) (Set (ι → ℝ)) :=
⟨withBotToSet⟩
#align box_integral.box.with_bot_coe BoxIntegral.Box.withBotCoe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_bot : ((⊥ : WithBot (Box ι)) : Set (ι → ℝ)) = ∅ := rfl
#align box_integral.box.coe_bot BoxIntegral.Box.coe_bot
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_coe : ((I : WithBot (Box ι)) : Set (ι → ℝ)) = I := rfl
#align box_integral.box.coe_coe BoxIntegral.Box.coe_coe
theorem isSome_iff : ∀ {I : WithBot (Box ι)}, I.isSome ↔ (I : Set (ι → ℝ)).Nonempty
| ⊥ => by
erw [Option.isSome]
simp
| (I : Box ι) => by
erw [Option.isSome]
simp [I.nonempty_coe]
#align box_integral.box.is_some_iff BoxIntegral.Box.isSome_iff
theorem biUnion_coe_eq_coe (I : WithBot (Box ι)) :
⋃ (J : Box ι) (_ : ↑J = I), (J : Set (ι → ℝ)) = I := by
induction I <;> simp [WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
#align box_integral.box.bUnion_coe_eq_coe BoxIntegral.Box.biUnion_coe_eq_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem withBotCoe_subset_iff {I J : WithBot (Box ι)} : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) ⊆ J ↔ I ≤ J := by
induction I; · simp
induction J; · simp [subset_empty_iff]
simp [le_def]
#align box_integral.box.with_bot_coe_subset_iff BoxIntegral.Box.withBotCoe_subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem withBotCoe_inj {I J : WithBot (Box ι)} : (I : Set (ι → ℝ)) = J ↔ I = J := by
simp only [Subset.antisymm_iff, ← le_antisymm_iff, withBotCoe_subset_iff]
#align box_integral.box.with_bot_coe_inj BoxIntegral.Box.withBotCoe_inj
/-- Make a `WithBot (Box ι)` from a pair of corners `l u : ι → ℝ`. If `l i < u i` for all `i`,
then the result is `⟨l, u, _⟩ : Box ι`, otherwise it is `⊥`. In any case, the result interpreted
as a set in `ι → ℝ` is the set `{x : ι → ℝ | ∀ i, x i ∈ Ioc (l i) (u i)}`. -/
def mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : WithBot (Box ι) :=
if h : ∀ i, l i < u i then ↑(⟨l, u, h⟩ : Box ι) else ⊥
#align box_integral.box.mk' BoxIntegral.Box.mk'
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_bot {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, u i ≤ l i := by
rw [mk']
split_ifs with h <;> simpa using h
#align box_integral.box.mk'_eq_bot BoxIntegral.Box.mk'_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem mk'_eq_coe {l u : ι → ℝ} : mk' l u = I ↔ l = I.lower ∧ u = I.upper := by
cases' I with lI uI hI; rw [mk']; split_ifs with h
· simp [WithBot.coe_eq_coe]
· suffices l = lI → u ≠ uI by simpa
rintro rfl rfl
exact h hI
#align box_integral.box.mk'_eq_coe BoxIntegral.Box.mk'_eq_coe
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk' (l u : ι → ℝ) : (mk' l u : Set (ι → ℝ)) = pi univ fun i ↦ Ioc (l i) (u i) := by
rw [mk']; split_ifs with h
· exact coe_eq_pi _
· rcases not_forall.mp h with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [coe_bot, univ_pi_eq_empty]
exact Ioc_eq_empty hi
#align box_integral.box.coe_mk' BoxIntegral.Box.coe_mk'
instance WithBot.inf : Inf (WithBot (Box ι)) :=
⟨fun I ↦
WithBot.recBotCoe (fun _ ↦ ⊥)
(fun I J ↦ WithBot.recBotCoe ⊥ (fun J ↦ mk' (I.lower ⊔ J.lower) (I.upper ⊓ J.upper)) J) I⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Box/Basic.lean | 353 | 362 | theorem coe_inf (I J : WithBot (Box ι)) : (↑(I ⊓ J) : Set (ι → ℝ)) = (I : Set _) ∩ J := by |
induction I
· change ∅ = _
simp
induction J
· change ∅ = _
simp
change ((mk' _ _ : WithBot (Box ι)) : Set (ι → ℝ)) = _
simp only [coe_eq_pi, ← pi_inter_distrib, Ioc_inter_Ioc, Pi.sup_apply, Pi.inf_apply, coe_mk',
coe_coe]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Gabriel Ebner. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Gabriel Ebner, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov, Yuyang Zhao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.RestrictScalars
#align_import analysis.calculus.deriv.comp from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3bce8d800a6f2b8f63fe1e588fd76a9ff4adcebe"
/-!
# One-dimensional derivatives of compositions of functions
In this file we prove the chain rule for the following cases:
* `HasDerivAt.comp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → 𝕜'` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasDerivAt.scomp` etc: `f : 𝕜' → E` composed with `g : 𝕜 → 𝕜'`;
* `HasFDerivAt.comp_hasDerivAt` etc: `f : E → F` composed with `g : 𝕜 → E`;
Here `𝕜` is the base normed field, `E` and `F` are normed spaces over `𝕜` and `𝕜'` is an algebra
over `𝕜` (e.g., `𝕜'=𝕜` or `𝕜=ℝ`, `𝕜'=ℂ`).
We also give versions with the `of_eq` suffix, which require an equality proof instead
of definitional equality of the different points used in the composition. These versions are
often more flexible to use.
For a more detailed overview of one-dimensional derivatives in mathlib, see the module docstring of
`analysis/calculus/deriv/basic`.
## Keywords
derivative, chain rule
-/
universe u v w
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter ENNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
open ContinuousLinearMap (smulRight smulRight_one_eq_iff)
variable {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type v} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {E : Type w} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : 𝕜 → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : F}
variable {x : 𝕜}
variable {s t : Set 𝕜}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter 𝕜}
section Composition
/-!
### Derivative of the composition of a vector function and a scalar function
We use `scomp` in lemmas on composition of vector valued and scalar valued functions, and `comp`
in lemmas on composition of scalar valued functions, in analogy for `smul` and `mul` (and also
because the `comp` version with the shorter name will show up much more often in applications).
The formula for the derivative involves `smul` in `scomp` lemmas, which can be reduced to
usual multiplication in `comp` lemmas.
-/
/- For composition lemmas, we put x explicit to help the elaborator, as otherwise Lean tends to
get confused since there are too many possibilities for composition -/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] {s' t' : Set 𝕜'} {h : 𝕜 → 𝕜'} {h₁ : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {h₂ : 𝕜' → 𝕜'} {h' h₂' : 𝕜'}
{h₁' : 𝕜} {g₁ : 𝕜' → F} {g₁' : F} {L' : Filter 𝕜'} {y : 𝕜'} (x)
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' (h x) L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh hL).hasDerivAtFilter
#align has_deriv_at_filter.scomp HasDerivAtFilter.scomp
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivAtFilter g₁ g₁' y L')
(hh : HasDerivAtFilter h h' x L) (hy : y = h x) (hL : Tendsto h L L') :
HasDerivAtFilter (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x L := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hL
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') : HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| tendsto_inf.2 ⟨hh.continuousAt, tendsto_principal.2 <| eventually_of_forall hs⟩
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp_has_deriv_at HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_hasDerivAt_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' s' y)
(hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hs : ∀ x, h x ∈ s') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp_hasDerivAt x hh hs
nonrec theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' (h x))
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x :=
hg.scomp x hh <| hh.continuousWithinAt.tendsto_nhdsWithin hst
#align has_deriv_within_at.scomp HasDerivWithinAt.scomp
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.scomp_of_eq (hg : HasDerivWithinAt g₁ g₁' t' y)
(hh : HasDerivWithinAt h h' s x) (hst : MapsTo h s t') (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivWithinAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') s x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh hst
/-- The chain rule. -/
nonrec theorem HasDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x :=
hg.scomp x hh hh.continuousAt
#align has_deriv_at.scomp HasDerivAt.scomp
/-- The chain rule. -/
theorem HasDerivAt.scomp_of_eq
(hg : HasDerivAt g₁ g₁' y) (hh : HasDerivAt h h' x) (hy : y = h x) :
HasDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by
rw [hy] at hg; exact hg.scomp x hh
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Deriv/Comp.lean | 118 | 120 | theorem HasStrictDerivAt.scomp (hg : HasStrictDerivAt g₁ g₁' (h x)) (hh : HasStrictDerivAt h h' x) :
HasStrictDerivAt (g₁ ∘ h) (h' • g₁') x := by |
simpa using ((hg.restrictScalars 𝕜).comp x hh).hasStrictDerivAt
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import geometry.euclidean.triangle from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Triangles
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and angles
in (possibly degenerate) triangles in real inner product spaces and
Euclidean affine spaces. More specialized results, and results
developed for simplices in general rather than just for triangles, are
in separate files. Definitions and results that make sense in more
general affine spaces rather than just in the Euclidean case go under
`LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace`.
## Implementation notes
Results in this file are generally given in a form with only those
non-degeneracy conditions needed for the particular result, rather
than requiring affine independence of the points of a triangle
unnecessarily.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_cosines
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pons_asinorum
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sum_of_angles_of_a_triangle
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
/-!
### Geometrical results on triangles in real inner product spaces
This section develops some results on (possibly degenerate) triangles
in real inner product spaces, where those definitions and results can
most conveniently be developed in terms of vectors and then used to
deduce corresponding results for Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
/-- **Law of cosines** (cosine rule), vector angle form. -/
theorem norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle (x y : V) :
‖x - y‖ * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ * ‖y‖ - 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) := by
rw [show 2 * ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.cos (angle x y) = 2 * (Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖)) by ring,
cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ←
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, ← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_sub_sub_self,
sub_add_eq_add_sub]
#align inner_product_geometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle InnerProductGeometry.norm_sub_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_sub_two_mul_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_angle
/-- **Pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
theorem angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x) := by
refine Real.injOn_cos ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ⟨angle_nonneg _ _, angle_le_pi _ _⟩ ?_
rw [cos_angle, cos_angle, h, ← neg_sub, norm_neg, neg_sub, inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, h, real_inner_comm x y]
#align inner_product_geometry.angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq
/-- **Converse of pons asinorum**, vector angle form. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Triangle.lean | 79 | 104 | theorem norm_eq_of_angle_sub_eq_angle_sub_rev_of_angle_ne_pi {x y : V}
(h : angle x (x - y) = angle y (y - x)) (hpi : angle x y ≠ π) : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by |
replace h := Real.arccos_injOn (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x (x - y)))
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one y (y - x))) h
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy]
· rw [← norm_neg (y - x), neg_sub, mul_comm, mul_comm ‖y‖, div_eq_mul_inv, div_eq_mul_inv,
mul_inv_rev, mul_inv_rev, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc] at h
replace h :=
mul_right_cancel₀ (inv_ne_zero fun hz => hxy (eq_of_sub_eq_zero (norm_eq_zero.1 hz))) h
rw [inner_sub_right, inner_sub_right, real_inner_comm x y, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm,
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, mul_sub_right_distrib, mul_sub_right_distrib,
mul_self_mul_inv, mul_self_mul_inv, sub_eq_sub_iff_sub_eq_sub, ← mul_sub_left_distrib] at h
by_cases hx0 : x = 0
· rw [hx0, norm_zero, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, zero_sub, neg_eq_zero] at h
rw [hx0, norm_zero, h]
· by_cases hy0 : y = 0
· rw [hy0, norm_zero, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, sub_zero] at h
rw [hy0, norm_zero, h]
· rw [inv_sub_inv (fun hz => hx0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz)) fun hz => hy0 (norm_eq_zero.1 hz), ←
neg_sub, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_comm, mul_div_assoc, ← mul_neg_one] at h
symm
by_contra hyx
replace h := (mul_left_cancel₀ (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hyx) h).symm
rw [real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, ← angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
exact hpi h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
#align_import order.well_founded from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2c84c2c5496117349007d97104e7bbb471381592"
/-!
# Well-founded relations
A relation is well-founded if it can be used for induction: for each `x`, `(∀ y, r y x → P y) → P x`
implies `P x`. Well-founded relations can be used for induction and recursion, including
construction of fixed points in the space of dependent functions `Π x : α , β x`.
The predicate `WellFounded` is defined in the core library. In this file we prove some extra lemmas
and provide a few new definitions: `WellFounded.min`, `WellFounded.sup`, and `WellFounded.succ`,
and an induction principle `WellFounded.induction_bot`.
-/
variable {α β γ : Type*}
namespace WellFounded
variable {r r' : α → α → Prop}
#align well_founded_relation.r WellFoundedRelation.rel
protected theorem isAsymm (h : WellFounded r) : IsAsymm α r := ⟨h.asymmetric⟩
#align well_founded.is_asymm WellFounded.isAsymm
protected theorem isIrrefl (h : WellFounded r) : IsIrrefl α r := @IsAsymm.isIrrefl α r h.isAsymm
#align well_founded.is_irrefl WellFounded.isIrrefl
instance [WellFoundedRelation α] : IsAsymm α WellFoundedRelation.rel :=
WellFoundedRelation.wf.isAsymm
instance : IsIrrefl α WellFoundedRelation.rel := IsAsymm.isIrrefl
theorem mono (hr : WellFounded r) (h : ∀ a b, r' a b → r a b) : WellFounded r' :=
Subrelation.wf (h _ _) hr
#align well_founded.mono WellFounded.mono
theorem onFun {α β : Sort*} {r : β → β → Prop} {f : α → β} :
WellFounded r → WellFounded (r on f) :=
InvImage.wf _
#align well_founded.on_fun WellFounded.onFun
/-- If `r` is a well-founded relation, then any nonempty set has a minimal element
with respect to `r`. -/
theorem has_min {α} {r : α → α → Prop} (H : WellFounded r) (s : Set α) :
s.Nonempty → ∃ a ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ s, ¬r x a
| ⟨a, ha⟩ => show ∃ b ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ s, ¬r x b from
Acc.recOn (H.apply a) (fun x _ IH =>
not_imp_not.1 fun hne hx => hne <| ⟨x, hx, fun y hy hyx => hne <| IH y hyx hy⟩)
ha
#align well_founded.has_min WellFounded.has_min
/-- A minimal element of a nonempty set in a well-founded order.
If you're working with a nonempty linear order, consider defining a
`ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` instance via
`WellFounded.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderWithBot` and using `Inf` instead. -/
noncomputable def min {r : α → α → Prop} (H : WellFounded r) (s : Set α) (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose (H.has_min s h)
#align well_founded.min WellFounded.min
theorem min_mem {r : α → α → Prop} (H : WellFounded r) (s : Set α) (h : s.Nonempty) :
H.min s h ∈ s :=
let ⟨h, _⟩ := Classical.choose_spec (H.has_min s h)
h
#align well_founded.min_mem WellFounded.min_mem
theorem not_lt_min {r : α → α → Prop} (H : WellFounded r) (s : Set α) (h : s.Nonempty) {x}
(hx : x ∈ s) : ¬r x (H.min s h) :=
let ⟨_, h'⟩ := Classical.choose_spec (H.has_min s h)
h' _ hx
#align well_founded.not_lt_min WellFounded.not_lt_min
| Mathlib/Order/WellFounded.lean | 82 | 89 | theorem wellFounded_iff_has_min {r : α → α → Prop} :
WellFounded r ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s.Nonempty → ∃ m ∈ s, ∀ x ∈ s, ¬r x m := by |
refine ⟨fun h => h.has_min, fun h => ⟨fun x => ?_⟩⟩
by_contra hx
obtain ⟨m, hm, hm'⟩ := h {x | ¬Acc r x} ⟨x, hx⟩
refine hm ⟨_, fun y hy => ?_⟩
by_contra hy'
exact hm' y hy' hy
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Felix Weilacher
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Cardinality
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Perfect
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Metric
import Mathlib.Topology.CountableSeparatingOn
#align_import measure_theory.constructions.polish from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# The Borel sigma-algebra on Polish spaces
We discuss several results pertaining to the relationship between the topology and the Borel
structure on Polish spaces.
## Main definitions and results
First, we define standard Borel spaces.
* A `StandardBorelSpace α` is a typeclass for measurable spaces which arise as the Borel sets
of some Polish topology.
Next, we define the class of analytic sets and establish its basic properties.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet s`: a set in a topological space is analytic if it is the continuous
image of a Polish space. Equivalently, it is empty, or the image of `ℕ → ℕ`.
* `MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous`: a continuous image of an analytic set is
analytic.
* `MeasurableSet.analyticSet`: in a Polish space, any Borel-measurable set is analytic.
Then, we show Lusin's theorem that two disjoint analytic sets can be separated by Borel sets.
* `MeasurablySeparable s t` states that there exists a measurable set containing `s` and disjoint
from `t`.
* `AnalyticSet.measurablySeparable` shows that two disjoint analytic sets are separated by a
Borel set.
We then prove the Lusin-Souslin theorem that a continuous injective image of a Borel subset of
a Polish space is Borel. The proof of this nontrivial result relies on the above results on
analytic sets.
* `MeasurableSet.image_of_continuousOn_injOn` asserts that, if `s` is a Borel measurable set in
a Polish space, then the image of `s` under a continuous injective map is still Borel measurable.
* `Continuous.measurableEmbedding` states that a continuous injective map on a Polish space
is a measurable embedding for the Borel sigma-algebra.
* `ContinuousOn.measurableEmbedding` is the same result for a map restricted to a measurable set
on which it is continuous.
* `Measurable.measurableEmbedding` states that a measurable injective map from
a standard Borel space to a second-countable topological space is a measurable embedding.
* `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`: in a Polish space, a set is clopenable (i.e., it can be made
open and closed by using a finer Polish topology) if and only if it is Borel-measurable.
We use this to prove several versions of the Borel isomorphism theorem.
* `PolishSpace.measurableEquivOfNotCountable` : Any two uncountable standard Borel spaces
are Borel isomorphic.
* `PolishSpace.Equiv.measurableEquiv` : Any two standard Borel spaces of the same cardinality
are Borel isomorphic.
-/
open Set Function PolishSpace PiNat TopologicalSpace Bornology Metric Filter Topology MeasureTheory
/-! ### Standard Borel Spaces -/
variable (α : Type*)
/-- A standard Borel space is a measurable space arising as the Borel sets of some Polish topology.
This is useful in situations where a space has no natural topology or
the natural topology in a space is non-Polish.
To endow a standard Borel space `α` with a compatible Polish topology, use
`letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. One can then use `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α` to
rewrite the `MeasurableSpace α` instance to `borel α t`, where `t` is the new topology. -/
class StandardBorelSpace [MeasurableSpace α] : Prop where
/-- There exists a compatible Polish topology. -/
polish : ∃ _ : TopologicalSpace α, BorelSpace α ∧ PolishSpace α
/-- A convenience class similar to `UpgradedPolishSpace`. No instance should be registered.
Instead one should use `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
class UpgradedStandardBorel extends MeasurableSpace α, TopologicalSpace α,
BorelSpace α, PolishSpace α
/-- Use as `letI := upgradeStandardBorel α` to endow a standard Borel space `α` with
a compatible Polish topology.
Warning: following this with `borelize α` will cause an error. Instead, one can
rewrite with `eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel α`.
TODO: fix the corresponding bug in `borelize`. -/
noncomputable
def upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [h : StandardBorelSpace α] :
UpgradedStandardBorel α := by
choose τ hb hp using h.polish
constructor
/-- The `MeasurableSpace α` instance on a `StandardBorelSpace` `α` is equal to
the borel sets of `upgradeStandardBorel α`. -/
theorem eq_borel_upgradeStandardBorel [MeasurableSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace α] :
‹MeasurableSpace α› = @borel _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace :=
@BorelSpace.measurable_eq _ (upgradeStandardBorel α).toTopologicalSpace _
(upgradeStandardBorel α).toBorelSpace
variable {α}
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
instance standardBorel_of_polish [τ : TopologicalSpace α]
[BorelSpace α] [PolishSpace α] : StandardBorelSpace α := by exists τ
instance countablyGenerated_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] :
MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
instance measurableSingleton_of_standardBorel [StandardBorelSpace α] : MeasurableSingletonClass α :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
inferInstance
namespace StandardBorelSpace
variable {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
section instances
/-- A product of two standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance prod [StandardBorelSpace α] [StandardBorelSpace β] : StandardBorelSpace (α × β) :=
letI := upgradeStandardBorel α
letI := upgradeStandardBorel β
inferInstance
/-- A product of countably many standard Borel spaces is standard Borel. -/
instance pi_countable {ι : Type*} [Countable ι] {α : ι → Type*} [∀ n, MeasurableSpace (α n)]
[∀ n, StandardBorelSpace (α n)] : StandardBorelSpace (∀ n, α n) :=
letI := fun n => upgradeStandardBorel (α n)
inferInstance
end instances
end StandardBorelSpace
end section
variable {ι : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-! ### Analytic sets -/
/-- An analytic set is a set which is the continuous image of some Polish space. There are several
equivalent characterizations of this definition. For the definition, we pick one that avoids
universe issues: a set is analytic if and only if it is a continuous image of `ℕ → ℕ` (or if it
is empty). The above more usual characterization is given
in `analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range`.
Warning: these are analytic sets in the context of descriptive set theory (which is why they are
registered in the namespace `MeasureTheory`). They have nothing to do with analytic sets in the
context of complex analysis. -/
irreducible_def AnalyticSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s = ∅ ∨ ∃ f : (ℕ → ℕ) → α, Continuous f ∧ range f = s
#align measure_theory.analytic_set MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet
theorem analyticSet_empty : AnalyticSet (∅ : Set α) := by
rw [AnalyticSet]
exact Or.inl rfl
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_empty MeasureTheory.analyticSet_empty
theorem analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (range f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty β
· rw [range_eq_empty]
exact analyticSet_empty
· rw [AnalyticSet]
obtain ⟨g, g_cont, hg⟩ : ∃ g : (ℕ → ℕ) → β, Continuous g ∧ Surjective g :=
exists_nat_nat_continuous_surjective β
refine Or.inr ⟨f ∘ g, f_cont.comp g_cont, ?_⟩
rw [hg.range_comp]
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_range_of_polish_space MeasureTheory.analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
/-- The image of an open set under a continuous map is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.IsOpen.analyticSet_image {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] [PolishSpace β]
{s : Set β} (hs : IsOpen s) {f : β → α} (f_cont : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rw [image_eq_range]
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace (f_cont.comp continuous_subtype_val)
#align is_open.analytic_set_image IsOpen.analyticSet_image
/-- A set is analytic if and only if it is the continuous image of some Polish space. -/
theorem analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range {s : Set α} :
AnalyticSet s ↔
∃ (β : Type) (h : TopologicalSpace β) (_ : @PolishSpace β h) (f : β → α),
@Continuous _ _ h _ f ∧ range f = s := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [AnalyticSet] at h
cases' h with h h
· refine ⟨Empty, inferInstance, inferInstance, Empty.elim, continuous_bot, ?_⟩
rw [h]
exact range_eq_empty _
· exact ⟨ℕ → ℕ, inferInstance, inferInstance, h⟩
· rintro ⟨β, h, h', f, f_cont, f_range⟩
rw [← f_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace f_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set_iff_exists_polish_space_range MeasureTheory.analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range
/-- The continuous image of an analytic set is analytic -/
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) := by
rcases analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 hs with ⟨γ, γtop, γpolish, g, g_cont, gs⟩
have : f '' s = range (f ∘ g) := by rw [range_comp, gs]
rw [this]
apply analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace
apply hf.comp_continuous g_cont fun x => _
rw [← gs]
exact mem_range_self
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous_on MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuousOn
theorem AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
(hs : AnalyticSet s) {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) : AnalyticSet (f '' s) :=
hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.image_of_continuous MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous
/-- A countable intersection of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iInter [hι : Nonempty ι] [Countable ι] [T2Space α] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) : AnalyticSet (⋂ n, s n) := by
rcases hι with ⟨i₀⟩
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The product space `γ = Π n, β n` is also Polish, and so is the subset
`t` of sequences `x n` for which `f n (x n)` is independent of `n`. The set `t` is Polish, and
the range of `x ↦ f 0 (x 0)` on `t` is exactly `⋂ n, s n`, so this set is analytic. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := ∀ n, β n
let t : Set γ := ⋂ n, { x | f n (x n) = f i₀ (x i₀) }
have t_closed : IsClosed t := by
apply isClosed_iInter
intro n
exact
isClosed_eq ((f_cont n).comp (continuous_apply n)) ((f_cont i₀).comp (continuous_apply i₀))
haveI : PolishSpace t := t_closed.polishSpace
let F : t → α := fun x => f i₀ ((x : γ) i₀)
have F_cont : Continuous F := (f_cont i₀).comp ((continuous_apply i₀).comp continuous_subtype_val)
have F_range : range F = ⋂ n : ι, s n := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· rintro y ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
have : f n ((x : γ) n) = F x := (mem_iInter.1 x.2 n : _)
rw [← this, ← f_range n]
exact mem_range_self _
· intro y hy
have A : ∀ n, ∃ x : β n, f n x = y := by
intro n
rw [← mem_range, f_range n]
exact mem_iInter.1 hy n
choose x hx using A
have xt : x ∈ t := by
refine mem_iInter.2 fun n => ?_
simp [hx]
refine ⟨⟨x, xt⟩, ?_⟩
exact hx i₀
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Inter MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iInter
/-- A countable union of analytic sets is analytic. -/
theorem AnalyticSet.iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ n, AnalyticSet (s n)) :
AnalyticSet (⋃ n, s n) := by
/- For the proof, write each `s n` as the continuous image under a map `f n` of a
Polish space `β n`. The union space `γ = Σ n, β n` is also Polish, and the map `F : γ → α` which
coincides with `f n` on `β n` sends it to `⋃ n, s n`. -/
choose β hβ h'β f f_cont f_range using fun n =>
analyticSet_iff_exists_polishSpace_range.1 (hs n)
let γ := Σn, β n
let F : γ → α := fun ⟨n, x⟩ ↦ f n x
have F_cont : Continuous F := continuous_sigma f_cont
have F_range : range F = ⋃ n, s n := by
simp only [γ, range_sigma_eq_iUnion_range, f_range]
rw [← F_range]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace F_cont
#align measure_theory.analytic_set.Union MeasureTheory.AnalyticSet.iUnion
theorem _root_.IsClosed.analyticSet [PolishSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsClosed s) :
AnalyticSet s := by
haveI : PolishSpace s := hs.polishSpace
rw [← @Subtype.range_val α s]
exact analyticSet_range_of_polishSpace continuous_subtype_val
#align is_closed.analytic_set IsClosed.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable set in a Polish space, there exists a finer Polish topology making
it clopen. This is in fact an equivalence, see `isClopenable_iff_measurableSet`. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.isClopenable [PolishSpace α] [MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α]
{s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : IsClopenable s := by
revert s
apply MeasurableSet.induction_on_open
· exact fun u hu => hu.isClopenable
· exact fun u _ h'u => h'u.compl
· exact fun f _ _ hf => IsClopenable.iUnion hf
#align measurable_set.is_clopenable MeasurableSet.isClopenable
/-- A Borel-measurable set in a Polish space is analytic. -/
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.analyticSet {α : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AnalyticSet s := by
/- For a short proof (avoiding measurable induction), one sees `s` as a closed set for a finer
topology `t'`. It is analytic for this topology. As the identity from `t'` to `t` is continuous
and the image of an analytic set is analytic, it follows that `s` is also analytic for `t`. -/
obtain ⟨t', t't, t'_polish, s_closed, _⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' ∧ IsClosed[t'] s ∧ IsOpen[t'] s :=
hs.isClopenable
have A := @IsClosed.analyticSet α t' t'_polish s s_closed
convert @AnalyticSet.image_of_continuous α t' α t s A id (continuous_id_of_le t't)
simp only [id, image_id']
#align measurable_set.analytic_set MeasurableSet.analyticSet
/-- Given a Borel-measurable function from a Polish space to a second-countable space, there exists
a finer Polish topology on the source space for which the function is continuous. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Polish.lean | 322 | 340 | theorem _root_.Measurable.exists_continuous {α β : Type*} [t : TopologicalSpace α] [PolishSpace α]
[MeasurableSpace α] [BorelSpace α] [tβ : TopologicalSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β]
[OpensMeasurableSpace β] {f : α → β} [SecondCountableTopology (range f)] (hf : Measurable f) :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, t' ≤ t ∧ @Continuous α β t' tβ f ∧ @PolishSpace α t' := by |
obtain ⟨b, b_count, -, hb⟩ :
∃ b : Set (Set (range f)), b.Countable ∧ ∅ ∉ b ∧ IsTopologicalBasis b :=
exists_countable_basis (range f)
haveI : Countable b := b_count.to_subtype
have : ∀ s : b, IsClopenable (rangeFactorization f ⁻¹' s) := fun s ↦ by
apply MeasurableSet.isClopenable
exact hf.subtype_mk (hb.isOpen s.2).measurableSet
choose T Tt Tpolish _ Topen using this
obtain ⟨t', t'T, t't, t'_polish⟩ :
∃ t' : TopologicalSpace α, (∀ i, t' ≤ T i) ∧ t' ≤ t ∧ @PolishSpace α t' :=
exists_polishSpace_forall_le (t := t) T Tt Tpolish
refine ⟨t', t't, ?_, t'_polish⟩
have : Continuous[t', _] (rangeFactorization f) :=
hb.continuous_iff.2 fun s hs => t'T ⟨s, hs⟩ _ (Topen ⟨s, hs⟩)
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Quotient
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
#align_import linear_algebra.projection from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"6d584f1709bedbed9175bd9350df46599bdd7213"
/-!
# Projection to a subspace
In this file we define
* `Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl (p q : Submodule R E) (h : IsCompl p q)`:
the projection of a module `E` to a submodule `p` along its complement `q`;
it is the unique linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`.
* `Submodule.isComplEquivProj p`: equivalence between submodules `q`
such that `IsCompl p q` and projections `f : E → p`, `∀ x ∈ p, f x = x`.
We also provide some lemmas justifying correctness of our definitions.
## Tags
projection, complement subspace
-/
noncomputable section Ring
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
variable (p q : Submodule R E)
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module S M] (m : Submodule S M)
namespace LinearMap
variable {p}
open Submodule
theorem ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) :
ker (id - p.subtype.comp f) = p := by
ext x
simp only [comp_apply, mem_ker, subtype_apply, sub_apply, id_apply, sub_eq_zero]
exact ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ Submodule.coe_mem _, fun hx => by erw [hf ⟨x, hx⟩, Subtype.coe_mk]⟩
#align linear_map.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj LinearMap.ker_id_sub_eq_of_proj
theorem range_eq_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : range f = ⊤ :=
range_eq_top.2 fun x => ⟨x, hf x⟩
#align linear_map.range_eq_of_proj LinearMap.range_eq_of_proj
theorem isCompl_of_proj {f : E →ₗ[R] p} (hf : ∀ x : p, f x = x) : IsCompl p (ker f) := by
constructor
· rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hpx, hfx⟩
erw [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_ker, hf ⟨x, hpx⟩, mk_eq_zero] at hfx
simp only [hfx, SetLike.mem_coe, zero_mem]
· rw [codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
intro x _
rw [mem_sup']
refine ⟨f x, ⟨x - f x, ?_⟩, add_sub_cancel _ _⟩
rw [mem_ker, LinearMap.map_sub, hf, sub_self]
#align linear_map.is_compl_of_proj LinearMap.isCompl_of_proj
end LinearMap
namespace Submodule
open LinearMap
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `M/p ≃ q`. -/
def quotientEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (E ⧸ p) ≃ₗ[R] q :=
LinearEquiv.symm <|
LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.mkQ.comp q.subtype)
⟨by rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_comp, ker_mkQ, disjoint_iff_comap_eq_bot.1 h.symm.disjoint], by
rw [← range_eq_top, range_comp, range_subtype, map_mkQ_eq_top, h.sup_eq_top]⟩
#align submodule.quotient_equiv_of_is_compl Submodule.quotientEquivOfIsCompl
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
-- Porting note: type ascriptions needed on the RHS
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (Quotient.mk (x:E) : E ⧸ p) := rfl
#align submodule.quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply Submodule.quotientEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply
@[simp]
theorem quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h (Quotient.mk x) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x
#align submodule.quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_apply_mk_coe Submodule.quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply_mk_coe
@[simp]
theorem mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E ⧸ p) :
(Quotient.mk (quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h x) : E ⧸ p) = x :=
(quotientEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_apply x
#align submodule.mk_quotient_equiv_of_is_compl_apply Submodule.mk_quotientEquivOfIsCompl_apply
/-- If `q` is a complement of `p`, then `p × q` is isomorphic to `E`. It is the unique
linear map `f : E → p` such that `f x = x` for `x ∈ p` and `f x = 0` for `x ∈ q`. -/
def prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : (p × q) ≃ₗ[R] E := by
apply LinearEquiv.ofBijective (p.subtype.coprod q.subtype)
constructor
· rw [← ker_eq_bot, ker_coprod_of_disjoint_range, ker_subtype, ker_subtype, prod_bot]
rw [range_subtype, range_subtype]
exact h.1
· rw [← range_eq_top, ← sup_eq_range, h.sup_eq_top]
#align submodule.prod_equiv_of_is_compl Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h : p × q →ₗ[R] E) = p.subtype.coprod q.subtype := rfl
#align submodule.coe_prod_equiv_of_is_compl Submodule.coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl
@[simp]
theorem coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p × q) :
prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h x = x.1 + x.2 := rfl
#align submodule.coe_prod_equiv_of_is_compl' Submodule.coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl'
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (x, 0) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
#align submodule.prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_left Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x = (0, x) :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm_apply_eq.2 <| by simp
#align submodule.prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_right Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).1 = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_left _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_right_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
#align submodule.prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_fst_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
((prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm x).2 = 0 ↔ x ∈ p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← (prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).apply_symm_apply x]
rw [coe_prodEquivOfIsCompl', Submodule.add_mem_iff_right _ (Submodule.coe_mem _),
mem_left_iff_eq_zero_of_disjoint h.disjoint]
#align submodule.prod_equiv_of_is_compl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl_symm_apply_snd_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) :
LinearEquiv.prodComm R q p ≪≫ₗ prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h = prodEquivOfIsCompl q p h.symm :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => add_comm _ _
#align submodule.prod_comm_trans_prod_equiv_of_is_compl Submodule.prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl
/-- Projection to a submodule along its complement. -/
def linearProjOfIsCompl (h : IsCompl p q) : E →ₗ[R] p :=
LinearMap.fst R p q ∘ₗ ↑(prodEquivOfIsCompl p q h).symm
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left (h : IsCompl p q) (x : p) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = x := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_left Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_range (h : IsCompl p q) : range (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = ⊤ :=
range_eq_of_proj (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h)
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_range Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_range
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff (h : IsCompl p q) {x : E} :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 ↔ x ∈ q := by simp [linearProjOfIsCompl]
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_eq_zero_iff Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) (hx : x ∈ q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
(linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h).2 hx
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_right' Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right'
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right (h : IsCompl p q) (x : q) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x = 0 :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right' h x x.2
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_apply_right Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_ker (h : IsCompl p q) : ker (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h) = q :=
ext fun _ => mem_ker.trans (linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_eq_zero_iff h)
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_ker Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_ker
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype (h : IsCompl p q) :
(linearProjOfIsCompl p q h).comp p.subtype = LinearMap.id :=
LinearMap.ext <| linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_comp_subtype Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_comp_subtype
theorem linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent (h : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
linearProjOfIsCompl p q h (linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x) = linearProjOfIsCompl p q h x :=
linearProjOfIsCompl_apply_left h _
#align submodule.linear_proj_of_is_compl_idempotent Submodule.linearProjOfIsCompl_idempotent
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃! u : p × q, (u.fst : E) + u.snd = x :=
(prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hc).toEquiv.bijective.existsUnique _
#align submodule.exists_unique_add_of_is_compl_prod Submodule.existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod
theorem existsUnique_add_of_isCompl (hc : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
∃ (u : p) (v : q), (u : E) + v = x ∧ ∀ (r : p) (s : q), (r : E) + s = x → r = u ∧ s = v :=
let ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂⟩ := existsUnique_add_of_isCompl_prod hc x
⟨u.1, u.2, hu₁, fun r s hrs => Prod.eq_iff_fst_eq_snd_eq.1 (hu₂ ⟨r, s⟩ hrs)⟩
#align submodule.exists_unique_add_of_is_compl Submodule.existsUnique_add_of_isCompl
theorem linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self (hpq : IsCompl p q) (x : E) :
(p.linearProjOfIsCompl q hpq x + q.linearProjOfIsCompl p hpq.symm x : E) = x := by
dsimp only [linearProjOfIsCompl]
rw [← prodComm_trans_prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq]
exact (prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ hpq).apply_symm_apply x
#align submodule.linear_proj_add_linear_proj_of_is_compl_eq_self Submodule.linear_proj_add_linearProjOfIsCompl_eq_self
end Submodule
namespace LinearMap
open Submodule
/-- Given linear maps `φ` and `ψ` from complement submodules, `LinearMap.ofIsCompl` is
the induced linear map over the entire module. -/
def ofIsCompl {p q : Submodule R E} (h : IsCompl p q) (φ : p →ₗ[R] F) (ψ : q →ₗ[R] F) : E →ₗ[R] F :=
LinearMap.coprod φ ψ ∘ₗ ↑(Submodule.prodEquivOfIsCompl _ _ h).symm
#align linear_map.of_is_compl LinearMap.ofIsCompl
variable {p q}
@[simp]
theorem ofIsCompl_left_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (u : p) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (u : E) = φ u := by simp [ofIsCompl]
#align linear_map.of_is_compl_left_apply LinearMap.ofIsCompl_left_apply
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Projection.lean | 238 | 239 | theorem ofIsCompl_right_apply (h : IsCompl p q) {φ : p →ₗ[R] F} {ψ : q →ₗ[R] F} (v : q) :
ofIsCompl h φ ψ (v : E) = ψ v := by | simp [ofIsCompl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Homology
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Single
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.AdditiveFunctor
#align_import algebra.homology.additive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"200eda15d8ff5669854ff6bcc10aaf37cb70498f"
/-!
# Homology is an additive functor
When `V` is preadditive, `HomologicalComplex V c` is also preadditive,
and `homologyFunctor` is additive.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits HomologicalComplex
variable {ι : Type*}
variable {V : Type u} [Category.{v} V] [Preadditive V]
variable {W : Type*} [Category W] [Preadditive W]
variable {W₁ W₂ : Type*} [Category W₁] [Category W₂] [HasZeroMorphisms W₁] [HasZeroMorphisms W₂]
variable {c : ComplexShape ι} {C D E : HomologicalComplex V c}
variable (f g : C ⟶ D) (h k : D ⟶ E) (i : ι)
namespace HomologicalComplex
instance : Zero (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨{ f := fun i => 0 }⟩
instance : Add (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f g => { f := fun i => f.f i + g.f i }⟩
instance : Neg (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f => { f := fun i => -f.f i }⟩
instance : Sub (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun f g => { f := fun i => f.f i - g.f i }⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun n f =>
{ f := fun i => n • f.f i
comm' := fun i j _ => by simp [Preadditive.nsmul_comp, Preadditive.comp_nsmul] }⟩
#align homological_complex.has_nat_scalar HomologicalComplex.hasNatScalar
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (C ⟶ D) :=
⟨fun n f =>
{ f := fun i => n • f.f i
comm' := fun i j _ => by simp [Preadditive.zsmul_comp, Preadditive.comp_zsmul] }⟩
#align homological_complex.has_int_scalar HomologicalComplex.hasIntScalar
@[simp]
theorem zero_f_apply (i : ι) : (0 : C ⟶ D).f i = 0 :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.zero_f_apply HomologicalComplex.zero_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem add_f_apply (f g : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (f + g).f i = f.f i + g.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.add_f_apply HomologicalComplex.add_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem neg_f_apply (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (-f).f i = -f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.neg_f_apply HomologicalComplex.neg_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem sub_f_apply (f g : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (f - g).f i = f.f i - g.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.sub_f_apply HomologicalComplex.sub_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_f_apply (n : ℕ) (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (n • f).f i = n • f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.nsmul_f_apply HomologicalComplex.nsmul_f_apply
@[simp]
theorem zsmul_f_apply (n : ℤ) (f : C ⟶ D) (i : ι) : (n • f).f i = n • f.f i :=
rfl
#align homological_complex.zsmul_f_apply HomologicalComplex.zsmul_f_apply
instance : AddCommGroup (C ⟶ D) :=
Function.Injective.addCommGroup Hom.f HomologicalComplex.hom_f_injective
(by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat) (by aesop_cat)
-- Porting note: proofs had to be provided here, otherwise Lean tries to apply
-- `Preadditive.add_comp/comp_add` to `HomologicalComplex V c`
instance : Preadditive (HomologicalComplex V c) where
add_comp _ _ _ f f' g := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, add_f_apply]
rw [Preadditive.add_comp]
comp_add _ _ _ f g g' := by
ext
simp only [comp_f, add_f_apply]
rw [Preadditive.comp_add]
/-- The `i`-th component of a chain map, as an additive map from chain maps to morphisms. -/
@[simps!]
def Hom.fAddMonoidHom {C₁ C₂ : HomologicalComplex V c} (i : ι) : (C₁ ⟶ C₂) →+ (C₁.X i ⟶ C₂.X i) :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f => Hom.f f i) fun _ _ => rfl
#align homological_complex.hom.f_add_monoid_hom HomologicalComplex.Hom.fAddMonoidHom
end HomologicalComplex
namespace HomologicalComplex
instance eval_additive (i : ι) : (eval V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.eval_additive HomologicalComplex.eval_additive
instance cycles'_additive [HasEqualizers V] : (cycles'Functor V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.cycles_additive HomologicalComplex.cycles'_additive
variable [HasImages V] [HasImageMaps V]
instance boundaries_additive : (boundariesFunctor V c i).Additive where
#align homological_complex.boundaries_additive HomologicalComplex.boundaries_additive
variable [HasEqualizers V] [HasCokernels V]
instance homology_additive : (homology'Functor V c i).Additive where
map_add {_ _ f g} := by
dsimp [homology'Functor]
ext
simp only [homology'.π_map, Preadditive.comp_add, ← Preadditive.add_comp]
congr
ext
simp
#align homological_complex.homology_additive HomologicalComplex.homology_additive
end HomologicalComplex
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- An additive functor induces a functor between homological complexes.
This is sometimes called the "prolongation".
-/
@[simps]
def Functor.mapHomologicalComplex (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
HomologicalComplex W₁ c ⥤ HomologicalComplex W₂ c where
obj C :=
{ X := fun i => F.obj (C.X i)
d := fun i j => F.map (C.d i j)
shape := fun i j w => by
dsimp only
rw [C.shape _ _ w, F.map_zero]
d_comp_d' := fun i j k _ _ => by rw [← F.map_comp, C.d_comp_d, F.map_zero] }
map f :=
{ f := fun i => F.map (f.f i)
comm' := fun i j _ => by
dsimp
rw [← F.map_comp, ← F.map_comp, f.comm] }
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex
instance (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).PreservesZeroMorphisms where
instance Functor.map_homogical_complex_additive (F : V ⥤ W) [F.Additive] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).Additive where
#align category_theory.functor.map_homogical_complex_additive CategoryTheory.Functor.map_homogical_complex_additive
variable (W₁)
/-- The functor on homological complexes induced by the identity functor is
isomorphic to the identity functor. -/
@[simps!]
def Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso (c : ComplexShape ι) :
(𝟭 W₁).mapHomologicalComplex c ≅ 𝟭 _ :=
NatIso.ofComponents fun K => Hom.isoOfComponents fun i => Iso.refl _
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex_id_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso
instance Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_reflects_iso (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[ReflectsIsomorphisms F] (c : ComplexShape ι) :
ReflectsIsomorphisms (F.mapHomologicalComplex c) :=
⟨fun f => by
intro
haveI : ∀ n : ι, IsIso (F.map (f.f n)) := fun n =>
((HomologicalComplex.eval W₂ c n).mapIso
(asIso ((F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f))).isIso_hom
haveI := fun n => isIso_of_reflects_iso (f.f n) F
exact HomologicalComplex.Hom.isIso_of_components f⟩
#align category_theory.functor.map_homological_complex_reflects_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_reflects_iso
variable {W₁}
/-- A natural transformation between functors induces a natural transformation
between those functors applied to homological complexes.
-/
@[simps]
def NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (α : F ⟶ G)
(c : ComplexShape ι) : F.mapHomologicalComplex c ⟶ G.mapHomologicalComplex c where
app C := { f := fun i => α.app _ }
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id
(c : ComplexShape ι) (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] :
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex (𝟙 F) c = 𝟙 (F.mapHomologicalComplex c) := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_id CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id
@[simp]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp (c : ComplexShape ι) {F G H : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [H.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(α : F ⟶ G) (β : G ⟶ H) :
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex (α ≫ β) c =
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c ≫ NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex β c := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_comp CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp
@[reassoc (attr := simp 1100)]
theorem NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality {c : ComplexShape ι} {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂}
[F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] [G.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(α : F ⟶ G) {C D : HomologicalComplex W₁ c} (f : C ⟶ D) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f ≫ (NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c).app D =
(NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α c).app C ≫ (G.mapHomologicalComplex c).map f := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.nat_trans.map_homological_complex_naturality CategoryTheory.NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_naturality
/-- A natural isomorphism between functors induces a natural isomorphism
between those functors applied to homological complexes.
-/
@[simps!]
def NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex {F G : W₁ ⥤ W₂} [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
[G.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (α : F ≅ G) (c : ComplexShape ι) :
F.mapHomologicalComplex c ≅ G.mapHomologicalComplex c where
hom := NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α.hom c
inv := NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex α.inv c
hom_inv_id := by simp only [← NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp, α.hom_inv_id,
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id]
inv_hom_id := by simp only [← NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_comp, α.inv_hom_id,
NatTrans.mapHomologicalComplex_id]
#align category_theory.nat_iso.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex
/-- An equivalence of categories induces an equivalences between the respective categories
of homological complex.
-/
@[simps]
def Equivalence.mapHomologicalComplex (e : W₁ ≌ W₂) [e.functor.PreservesZeroMorphisms]
(c : ComplexShape ι) :
HomologicalComplex W₁ c ≌ HomologicalComplex W₂ c where
functor := e.functor.mapHomologicalComplex c
inverse := e.inverse.mapHomologicalComplex c
unitIso :=
(Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso W₁ c).symm ≪≫ NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex e.unitIso c
counitIso := NatIso.mapHomologicalComplex e.counitIso c ≪≫
Functor.mapHomologicalComplexIdIso W₂ c
#align category_theory.equivalence.map_homological_complex CategoryTheory.Equivalence.mapHomologicalComplex
end CategoryTheory
namespace ChainComplex
variable {α : Type*} [AddRightCancelSemigroup α] [One α] [DecidableEq α]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/Additive.lean | 262 | 270 | theorem map_chain_complex_of (F : W₁ ⥤ W₂) [F.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (X : α → W₁)
(d : ∀ n, X (n + 1) ⟶ X n) (sq : ∀ n, d (n + 1) ≫ d n = 0) :
(F.mapHomologicalComplex _).obj (ChainComplex.of X d sq) =
ChainComplex.of (fun n => F.obj (X n)) (fun n => F.map (d n)) fun n => by
rw [← F.map_comp, sq n, Functor.map_zero] := by |
refine HomologicalComplex.ext rfl ?_
rintro i j (rfl : j + 1 = i)
simp only [CategoryTheory.Functor.mapHomologicalComplex_obj_d, of_d, eqToHom_refl, comp_id,
id_comp]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Adam Topaz, Johan Commelin, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Opposite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Zero
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.LeftExact
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.Limits
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.Exact
import Mathlib.Tactic.TFAE
#align_import category_theory.abelian.exact from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Exact sequences in abelian categories
In an abelian category, we get several interesting results related to exactness which are not
true in more general settings.
## Main results
* `(f, g)` is exact if and only if `f ≫ g = 0` and `kernel.ι g ≫ cokernel.π f = 0`. This
characterisation tends to be less cumbersome to work with than the original definition involving
the comparison map `image f ⟶ kernel g`.
* If `(f, g)` is exact, then `image.ι f` has the universal property of the kernel of `g`.
* `f` is a monomorphism iff `kernel.ι f = 0` iff `Exact 0 f`, and `f` is an epimorphism iff
`cokernel.π = 0` iff `Exact f 0`.
* A faithful functor between abelian categories that preserves zero morphisms reflects exact
sequences.
* `X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z ⟶ 0` is exact if and only if the second map is a cokernel of the first, and
`0 ⟶ X ⟶ Y ⟶ Z` is exact if and only if the first map is a kernel of the second.
* An exact functor preserves exactness, more specifically, `F` preserves finite colimits and
finite limits, if and only if `Exact f g` implies `Exact (F.map f) (F.map g)`.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory Limits Preadditive
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] [Abelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory
namespace Abelian
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z)
attribute [local instance] hasEqualizers_of_hasKernels
/-- In an abelian category, a pair of morphisms `f : X ⟶ Y`, `g : Y ⟶ Z` is exact
iff `imageSubobject f = kernelSubobject g`.
-/
theorem exact_iff_image_eq_kernel : Exact f g ↔ imageSubobject f = kernelSubobject g := by
constructor
· intro h
have : IsIso (imageToKernel f g h.w) := have := h.epi; isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
refine Subobject.eq_of_comm (asIso (imageToKernel _ _ h.w)) ?_
simp
· apply exact_of_image_eq_kernel
#align category_theory.abelian.exact_iff_image_eq_kernel CategoryTheory.Abelian.exact_iff_image_eq_kernel
theorem exact_iff : Exact f g ↔ f ≫ g = 0 ∧ kernel.ι g ≫ cokernel.π f = 0 := by
constructor
· exact fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, kernel_comp_cokernel f g h⟩
· refine fun h ↦ ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
suffices hl : IsLimit
(KernelFork.ofι (imageSubobject f).arrow (imageSubobject_arrow_comp_eq_zero h.1)) by
have : imageToKernel f g h.1 = (hl.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _)).hom ≫
(kernelSubobjectIso _).inv := by ext; simp
rw [this]
infer_instance
refine KernelFork.IsLimit.ofι _ _ (fun u hu ↦ ?_) ?_ (fun _ _ _ h ↦ ?_)
· refine kernel.lift (cokernel.π f) u ?_ ≫ (imageIsoImage f).hom ≫ (imageSubobjectIso _).inv
rw [← kernel.lift_ι g u hu, Category.assoc, h.2, comp_zero]
· aesop_cat
· rw [← cancel_mono (imageSubobject f).arrow, h]
simp
#align category_theory.abelian.exact_iff CategoryTheory.Abelian.exact_iff
theorem exact_iff' {cg : KernelFork g} (hg : IsLimit cg) {cf : CokernelCofork f}
(hf : IsColimit cf) : Exact f g ↔ f ≫ g = 0 ∧ cg.ι ≫ cf.π = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
exact ⟨h.1, fork_ι_comp_cofork_π f g h cg cf⟩
· rw [exact_iff]
refine fun h => ⟨h.1, ?_⟩
apply zero_of_epi_comp (IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso hg (limit.isLimit _)).hom
apply zero_of_comp_mono (IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso (colimit.isColimit _) hf).hom
simp [h.2]
#align category_theory.abelian.exact_iff' CategoryTheory.Abelian.exact_iff'
open List in
theorem exact_tfae :
TFAE [Exact f g, f ≫ g = 0 ∧ kernel.ι g ≫ cokernel.π f = 0,
imageSubobject f = kernelSubobject g] := by
tfae_have 1 ↔ 2; · apply exact_iff
tfae_have 1 ↔ 3; · apply exact_iff_image_eq_kernel
tfae_finish
#align category_theory.abelian.exact_tfae CategoryTheory.Abelian.exact_tfae
nonrec theorem IsEquivalence.exact_iff {D : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} D] [Abelian D] (F : C ⥤ D)
[F.IsEquivalence] : Exact (F.map f) (F.map g) ↔ Exact f g := by
simp only [exact_iff, ← F.map_eq_zero_iff, F.map_comp, Category.assoc, ←
kernelComparison_comp_ι g F, ← π_comp_cokernelComparison f F]
rw [IsIso.comp_left_eq_zero (kernelComparison g F), ← Category.assoc,
IsIso.comp_right_eq_zero _ (cokernelComparison f F)]
#align category_theory.abelian.is_equivalence.exact_iff CategoryTheory.Abelian.IsEquivalence.exact_iff
/-- The dual result is true even in non-abelian categories, see
`CategoryTheory.exact_comp_mono_iff`. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/Exact.lean | 115 | 120 | theorem exact_epi_comp_iff {W : C} (h : W ⟶ X) [Epi h] : Exact (h ≫ f) g ↔ Exact f g := by |
refine ⟨fun hfg => ?_, fun h => exact_epi_comp h⟩
let hc := isCokernelOfComp _ _ (colimit.isColimit (parallelPair (h ≫ f) 0))
(by rw [← cancel_epi h, ← Category.assoc, CokernelCofork.condition, comp_zero]) rfl
refine (exact_iff' _ _ (limit.isLimit _) hc).2 ⟨?_, ((exact_iff _ _).1 hfg).2⟩
exact zero_of_epi_comp h (by rw [← hfg.1, Category.assoc])
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.CartanSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Algebra.Lie.Weights.Basic
/-!
# Weights and roots of Lie modules and Lie algebras with respect to Cartan subalgebras
Given a Lie algebra `L` which is not necessarily nilpotent, it may be useful to study its
representations by restricting them to a nilpotent subalgebra (e.g., a Cartan subalgebra). In the
particular case when we view `L` as a module over itself via the adjoint action, the weight spaces
of `L` restricted to a nilpotent subalgebra are known as root spaces.
Basic definitions and properties of the above ideas are provided in this file.
## Main definitions
* `LieAlgebra.rootSpace`
* `LieAlgebra.corootSpace`
* `LieAlgebra.rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct`
* `LieAlgebra.rootSpaceProduct`
* `LieAlgebra.zeroRootSubalgebra_eq_iff_is_cartan`
-/
suppress_compilation
open Set
variable {R L : Type*} [CommRing R] [LieRing L] [LieAlgebra R L]
(H : LieSubalgebra R L) [LieAlgebra.IsNilpotent R H]
{M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [LieRingModule L M] [LieModule R L M]
namespace LieAlgebra
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct.LieModule LieModule
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L`, the root space of a map `χ : H → R` is the weight
space of `L` regarded as a module of `H` via the adjoint action. -/
abbrev rootSpace (χ : H → R) : LieSubmodule R H L :=
weightSpace L χ
#align lie_algebra.root_space LieAlgebra.rootSpace
theorem zero_rootSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent [IsNilpotent R L] :
rootSpace (⊤ : LieSubalgebra R L) 0 = ⊤ :=
zero_weightSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent L
#align lie_algebra.zero_root_space_eq_top_of_nilpotent LieAlgebra.zero_rootSpace_eq_top_of_nilpotent
@[simp]
theorem rootSpace_comap_eq_weightSpace (χ : H → R) :
(rootSpace H χ).comap H.incl' = weightSpace H χ :=
comap_weightSpace_eq_of_injective Subtype.coe_injective
#align lie_algebra.root_space_comap_eq_weight_space LieAlgebra.rootSpace_comap_eq_weightSpace
variable {H}
theorem lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace {χ₁ χ₂ : H → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H χ₁) (hm : m ∈ weightSpace M χ₂) : ⁅x, m⁆ ∈ weightSpace M (χ₁ + χ₂) := by
rw [weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf]
intro y
replace hx : x ∈ weightSpaceOf L (χ₁ y) y := by
rw [rootSpace, weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf] at hx; exact hx y
replace hm : m ∈ weightSpaceOf M (χ₂ y) y := by
rw [weightSpace, LieSubmodule.mem_iInf] at hm; exact hm y
exact lie_mem_maxGenEigenspace_toEnd hx hm
#align lie_algebra.lie_mem_weight_space_of_mem_weight_space LieAlgebra.lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace
lemma toEnd_pow_apply_mem {χ₁ χ₂ : H → R} {x : L} {m : M}
(hx : x ∈ rootSpace H χ₁) (hm : m ∈ weightSpace M χ₂) (n) :
(toEnd R L M x ^ n : Module.End R M) m ∈ weightSpace M (n • χ₁ + χ₂) := by
induction n
· simpa using hm
· next n IH =>
simp only [pow_succ', LinearMap.mul_apply, toEnd_apply_apply,
Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, rootSpace]
convert lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace hx IH using 2
rw [succ_nsmul, ← add_assoc, add_comm (n • _)]
variable (R L H M)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct`,
which is close to the deterministic timeout limit.
-/
def rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux {χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R} (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
rootSpace H χ₁ →ₗ[R] weightSpace M χ₂ →ₗ[R] weightSpace M χ₃ where
toFun x :=
{ toFun := fun m =>
⟨⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆, hχ ▸ lie_mem_weightSpace_of_mem_weightSpace x.property m.property⟩
map_add' := fun m n => by simp only [LieSubmodule.coe_add, lie_add]; rfl
map_smul' := fun t m => by
dsimp only
conv_lhs =>
congr
rw [LieSubmodule.coe_smul, lie_smul]
rfl }
map_add' x y := by
ext m
simp only [AddSubmonoid.coe_add, Submodule.coe_toAddSubmonoid, add_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk,
AddHom.coe_mk, LinearMap.add_apply, AddSubmonoid.mk_add_mk]
map_smul' t x := by
simp only [RingHom.id_apply]
ext m
simp only [SetLike.val_smul, smul_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, LinearMap.smul_apply,
SetLike.mk_smul_mk]
#align lie_algebra.root_space_weight_space_product_aux LieAlgebra.rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux
-- Porting note (#11083): this def is _really_ slow
-- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5028
/-- Given a nilpotent Lie subalgebra `H ⊆ L` together with `χ₁ χ₂ : H → R`, there is a natural
`R`-bilinear product of root vectors and weight vectors, compatible with the actions of `H`. -/
def rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃) :
rootSpace H χ₁ ⊗[R] weightSpace M χ₂ →ₗ⁅R,H⁆ weightSpace M χ₃ :=
liftLie R H (rootSpace H χ₁) (weightSpace M χ₂) (weightSpace M χ₃)
{ toLinearMap := rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux R L H M hχ
map_lie' := fun {x y} => by
ext m
simp only [rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux, LieSubmodule.coe_bracket,
LieSubalgebra.coe_bracket_of_module, lie_lie, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
Subtype.coe_mk, LieHom.lie_apply, LieSubmodule.coe_sub] }
#align lie_algebra.root_space_weight_space_product LieAlgebra.rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct
@[simp]
theorem coe_rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct_tmul (χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ : H → R) (hχ : χ₁ + χ₂ = χ₃)
(x : rootSpace H χ₁) (m : weightSpace M χ₂) :
(rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H M χ₁ χ₂ χ₃ hχ (x ⊗ₜ m) : M) = ⁅(x : L), (m : M)⁆ := by
simp only [rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct, rootSpaceWeightSpaceProductAux, coe_liftLie_eq_lift_coe,
AddHom.toFun_eq_coe, LinearMap.coe_toAddHom, lift_apply, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
Submodule.coe_mk]
#align lie_algebra.coe_root_space_weight_space_product_tmul LieAlgebra.coe_rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct_tmul
| Mathlib/Algebra/Lie/Weights/Cartan.lean | 135 | 141 | theorem mapsTo_toEnd_weightSpace_add_of_mem_rootSpace (α χ : H → R)
{x : L} (hx : x ∈ rootSpace H α) :
MapsTo (toEnd R L M x) (weightSpace M χ) (weightSpace M (α + χ)) := by |
intro m hm
let x' : rootSpace H α := ⟨x, hx⟩
let m' : weightSpace M χ := ⟨m, hm⟩
exact (rootSpaceWeightSpaceProduct R L H M α χ (α + χ) rfl (x' ⊗ₜ m')).property
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Adam Topaz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Plus
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ConcreteCategory
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheafification from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Sheafification
We construct the sheafification of a presheaf over a site `C` with values in `D` whenever
`D` is a concrete category for which the forgetful functor preserves the appropriate (co)limits
and reflects isomorphisms.
We generally follow the approach of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00W1
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits Opposite
universe w v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {J : GrothendieckTopology C}
variable {D : Type w} [Category.{max v u} D]
section
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max v u} D]
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
-- porting note (#5171): removed @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
/-- A concrete version of the multiequalizer, to be used below. -/
def Meq {X : C} (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (S : J.Cover X) :=
{ x : ∀ I : S.Arrow, P.obj (op I.Y) //
∀ I : S.Relation, P.map I.g₁.op (x I.fst) = P.map I.g₂.op (x I.snd) }
#align category_theory.meq CategoryTheory.Meq
end
namespace Meq
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max v u} D]
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
instance {X} (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (S : J.Cover X) :
CoeFun (Meq P S) fun _ => ∀ I : S.Arrow, P.obj (op I.Y) :=
⟨fun x => x.1⟩
@[ext]
theorem ext {X} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x y : Meq P S) (h : ∀ I : S.Arrow, x I = y I) :
x = y :=
Subtype.ext <| funext <| h
#align category_theory.meq.ext CategoryTheory.Meq.ext
theorem condition {X} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) (I : S.Relation) :
P.map I.g₁.op (x ((S.index P).fstTo I)) = P.map I.g₂.op (x ((S.index P).sndTo I)) :=
x.2 _
#align category_theory.meq.condition CategoryTheory.Meq.condition
/-- Refine a term of `Meq P T` with respect to a refinement `S ⟶ T` of covers. -/
def refine {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S T : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P T) (e : S ⟶ T) : Meq P S :=
⟨fun I => x ⟨I.Y, I.f, (leOfHom e) _ I.hf⟩, fun I =>
x.condition
⟨I.Y₁, I.Y₂, I.Z, I.g₁, I.g₂, I.f₁, I.f₂, (leOfHom e) _ I.h₁, (leOfHom e) _ I.h₂, I.w⟩⟩
#align category_theory.meq.refine CategoryTheory.Meq.refine
@[simp]
theorem refine_apply {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S T : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P T) (e : S ⟶ T)
(I : S.Arrow) : x.refine e I = x ⟨I.Y, I.f, (leOfHom e) _ I.hf⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.meq.refine_apply CategoryTheory.Meq.refine_apply
/-- Pull back a term of `Meq P S` with respect to a morphism `f : Y ⟶ X` in `C`. -/
def pullback {Y X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) (f : Y ⟶ X) :
Meq P ((J.pullback f).obj S) :=
⟨fun I => x ⟨_, I.f ≫ f, I.hf⟩, fun I =>
x.condition
⟨I.Y₁, I.Y₂, I.Z, I.g₁, I.g₂, I.f₁ ≫ f, I.f₂ ≫ f, I.h₁, I.h₂, by simp [I.w_assoc]⟩⟩
#align category_theory.meq.pullback CategoryTheory.Meq.pullback
@[simp]
theorem pullback_apply {Y X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(I : ((J.pullback f).obj S).Arrow) : x.pullback f I = x ⟨_, I.f ≫ f, I.hf⟩ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.meq.pullback_apply CategoryTheory.Meq.pullback_apply
@[simp]
theorem pullback_refine {Y X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S T : J.Cover X} (h : S ⟶ T) (f : Y ⟶ X)
(x : Meq P T) : (x.pullback f).refine ((J.pullback f).map h) = (refine x h).pullback _ :=
rfl
#align category_theory.meq.pullback_refine CategoryTheory.Meq.pullback_refine
/-- Make a term of `Meq P S`. -/
def mk {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (S : J.Cover X) (x : P.obj (op X)) : Meq P S :=
⟨fun I => P.map I.f.op x, fun I => by
dsimp
simp only [← comp_apply, ← P.map_comp, ← op_comp, I.w]⟩
#align category_theory.meq.mk CategoryTheory.Meq.mk
theorem mk_apply {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (S : J.Cover X) (x : P.obj (op X)) (I : S.Arrow) :
mk S x I = P.map I.f.op x :=
rfl
#align category_theory.meq.mk_apply CategoryTheory.Meq.mk_apply
variable [PreservesLimits (forget D)]
/-- The equivalence between the type associated to `multiequalizer (S.index P)` and `Meq P S`. -/
noncomputable def equiv {X : C} (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (S : J.Cover X) [HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)] :
(multiequalizer (S.index P) : D) ≃ Meq P S :=
Limits.Concrete.multiequalizerEquiv _
#align category_theory.meq.equiv CategoryTheory.Meq.equiv
@[simp]
theorem equiv_apply {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} [HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
(x : (multiequalizer (S.index P) : D)) (I : S.Arrow) :
equiv P S x I = Multiequalizer.ι (S.index P) I x :=
rfl
#align category_theory.meq.equiv_apply CategoryTheory.Meq.equiv_apply
@[simp]
theorem equiv_symm_eq_apply {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} [HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
(x : Meq P S) (I : S.Arrow) :
Multiequalizer.ι (S.index P) I ((Meq.equiv P S).symm x) = x I := by
rw [← equiv_apply]
simp
#align category_theory.meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply CategoryTheory.Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply
end Meq
namespace GrothendieckTopology
namespace Plus
variable [ConcreteCategory.{max v u} D]
attribute [local instance] ConcreteCategory.hasCoeToSort ConcreteCategory.instFunLike
variable [PreservesLimits (forget D)]
variable [∀ X : C, HasColimitsOfShape (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ D]
variable [∀ (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (X : C) (S : J.Cover X), HasMultiequalizer (S.index P)]
noncomputable section
/-- Make a term of `(J.plusObj P).obj (op X)` from `x : Meq P S`. -/
def mk {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) : (J.plusObj P).obj (op X) :=
colimit.ι (J.diagram P X) (op S) ((Meq.equiv P S).symm x)
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.mk CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.mk
theorem res_mk_eq_mk_pullback {Y X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) (f : Y ⟶ X) :
(J.plusObj P).map f.op (mk x) = mk (x.pullback f) := by
dsimp [mk, plusObj]
rw [← comp_apply (x := (Meq.equiv P S).symm x), ι_colimMap_assoc, colimit.ι_pre,
comp_apply (x := (Meq.equiv P S).symm x)]
apply congr_arg
apply (Meq.equiv P _).injective
erw [Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
ext i
simp only [Functor.op_obj, unop_op, pullback_obj, diagram_obj, Functor.comp_obj,
diagramPullback_app, Meq.equiv_apply, Meq.pullback_apply]
erw [← comp_apply, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply]
cases i; rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.res_mk_eq_mk_pullback CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.res_mk_eq_mk_pullback
theorem toPlus_mk {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (S : J.Cover X) (x : P.obj (op X)) :
(J.toPlus P).app _ x = mk (Meq.mk S x) := by
dsimp [mk, toPlus]
let e : S ⟶ ⊤ := homOfLE (OrderTop.le_top _)
rw [← colimit.w _ e.op]
delta Cover.toMultiequalizer
erw [comp_apply, comp_apply]
apply congr_arg
dsimp [diagram]
apply Concrete.multiequalizer_ext
intro i
simp only [← comp_apply, Category.assoc, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Category.comp_id,
Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply]
rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.to_plus_mk CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.toPlus_mk
theorem toPlus_apply {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (S : J.Cover X) (x : Meq P S) (I : S.Arrow) :
(J.toPlus P).app _ (x I) = (J.plusObj P).map I.f.op (mk x) := by
dsimp only [toPlus, plusObj]
delta Cover.toMultiequalizer
dsimp [mk]
erw [← comp_apply]
rw [ι_colimMap_assoc, colimit.ι_pre, comp_apply, comp_apply]
dsimp only [Functor.op]
let e : (J.pullback I.f).obj (unop (op S)) ⟶ ⊤ := homOfLE (OrderTop.le_top _)
rw [← colimit.w _ e.op]
erw [comp_apply]
apply congr_arg
apply Concrete.multiequalizer_ext
intro i
dsimp [diagram]
rw [← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, ← comp_apply, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Multiequalizer.lift_ι,
Multiequalizer.lift_ι]
erw [Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply]
let RR : S.Relation :=
⟨_, _, _, i.f, 𝟙 _, I.f, i.f ≫ I.f, I.hf, Sieve.downward_closed _ I.hf _, by simp⟩
erw [x.condition RR]
simp only [unop_op, pullback_obj, op_id, Functor.map_id, id_apply]
rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.to_plus_apply CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.toPlus_apply
theorem toPlus_eq_mk {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (x : P.obj (op X)) :
(J.toPlus P).app _ x = mk (Meq.mk ⊤ x) := by
dsimp [mk, toPlus]
delta Cover.toMultiequalizer
simp only [comp_apply]
apply congr_arg
apply (Meq.equiv P ⊤).injective
ext i
rw [Meq.equiv_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply, ← comp_apply, Multiequalizer.lift_ι]
rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.to_plus_eq_mk CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.toPlus_eq_mk
variable [∀ X : C, PreservesColimitsOfShape (J.Cover X)ᵒᵖ (forget D)]
theorem exists_rep {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} (x : (J.plusObj P).obj (op X)) :
∃ (S : J.Cover X) (y : Meq P S), x = mk y := by
obtain ⟨S, y, h⟩ := Concrete.colimit_exists_rep (J.diagram P X) x
use S.unop, Meq.equiv _ _ y
rw [← h]
dsimp [mk]
simp
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.exists_rep CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.exists_rep
theorem eq_mk_iff_exists {X : C} {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D} {S T : J.Cover X} (x : Meq P S) (y : Meq P T) :
mk x = mk y ↔ ∃ (W : J.Cover X) (h1 : W ⟶ S) (h2 : W ⟶ T), x.refine h1 = y.refine h2 := by
constructor
· intro h
obtain ⟨W, h1, h2, hh⟩ := Concrete.colimit_exists_of_rep_eq.{u} _ _ _ h
use W.unop, h1.unop, h2.unop
ext I
apply_fun Multiequalizer.ι (W.unop.index P) I at hh
convert hh
all_goals
dsimp [diagram]
erw [← comp_apply, Multiequalizer.lift_ι, Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply]
cases I; rfl
· rintro ⟨S, h1, h2, e⟩
apply Concrete.colimit_rep_eq_of_exists
use op S, h1.op, h2.op
apply Concrete.multiequalizer_ext
intro i
apply_fun fun ee => ee i at e
convert e
all_goals
dsimp [diagram]
rw [← comp_apply, Multiequalizer.lift_ι]
erw [Meq.equiv_symm_eq_apply]
cases i; rfl
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.eq_mk_iff_exists CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.eq_mk_iff_exists
/-- `P⁺` is always separated. -/
theorem sep {X : C} (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D) (S : J.Cover X) (x y : (J.plusObj P).obj (op X))
(h : ∀ I : S.Arrow, (J.plusObj P).map I.f.op x = (J.plusObj P).map I.f.op y) : x = y := by
-- First, we choose representatives for x and y.
obtain ⟨Sx, x, rfl⟩ := exists_rep x
obtain ⟨Sy, y, rfl⟩ := exists_rep y
simp only [res_mk_eq_mk_pullback] at h
-- Next, using our assumption,
-- choose covers over which the pullbacks of these representatives become equal.
choose W h1 h2 hh using fun I : S.Arrow => (eq_mk_iff_exists _ _).mp (h I)
-- To prove equality, it suffices to prove that there exists a cover over which
-- the representatives become equal.
rw [eq_mk_iff_exists]
-- Construct the cover over which the representatives become equal by combining the various
-- covers chosen above.
let B : J.Cover X := S.bind W
use B
-- Prove that this cover refines the two covers over which our representatives are defined
-- and use these proofs.
let ex : B ⟶ Sx :=
homOfLE
(by
rintro Y f ⟨Z, e1, e2, he2, he1, hee⟩
rw [← hee]
apply leOfHom (h1 ⟨_, _, he2⟩)
exact he1)
let ey : B ⟶ Sy :=
homOfLE
(by
rintro Y f ⟨Z, e1, e2, he2, he1, hee⟩
rw [← hee]
apply leOfHom (h2 ⟨_, _, he2⟩)
exact he1)
use ex, ey
-- Now prove that indeed the representatives become equal over `B`.
-- This will follow by using the fact that our representatives become
-- equal over the chosen covers.
ext1 I
let IS : S.Arrow := I.fromMiddle
specialize hh IS
let IW : (W IS).Arrow := I.toMiddle
apply_fun fun e => e IW at hh
convert hh using 1
· let Rx : Sx.Relation :=
⟨I.Y, I.Y, I.Y, 𝟙 _, 𝟙 _, I.f, I.toMiddleHom ≫ I.fromMiddleHom, leOfHom ex _ I.hf,
by simpa only [I.middle_spec] using leOfHom ex _ I.hf, by simp [I.middle_spec]⟩
simpa [id_apply] using x.condition Rx
· let Ry : Sy.Relation :=
⟨I.Y, I.Y, I.Y, 𝟙 _, 𝟙 _, I.f, I.toMiddleHom ≫ I.fromMiddleHom, leOfHom ey _ I.hf,
by simpa only [I.middle_spec] using leOfHom ey _ I.hf, by simp [I.middle_spec]⟩
simpa [id_apply] using y.condition Ry
#align category_theory.grothendieck_topology.plus.sep CategoryTheory.GrothendieckTopology.Plus.sep
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/ConcreteSheafification.lean | 317 | 329 | theorem inj_of_sep (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ D)
(hsep :
∀ (X : C) (S : J.Cover X) (x y : P.obj (op X)),
(∀ I : S.Arrow, P.map I.f.op x = P.map I.f.op y) → x = y)
(X : C) : Function.Injective ((J.toPlus P).app (op X)) := by |
intro x y h
simp only [toPlus_eq_mk] at h
rw [eq_mk_iff_exists] at h
obtain ⟨W, h1, h2, hh⟩ := h
apply hsep X W
intro I
apply_fun fun e => e I at hh
exact hh
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Mitchell Lee. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coxeter.Length
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Parity
/-!
# Reflections, inversions, and inversion sequences
Throughout this file, `B` is a type and `M : CoxeterMatrix B` is a Coxeter matrix.
`cs : CoxeterSystem M W` is a Coxeter system; that is, `W` is a group, and `cs` holds the data
of a group isomorphism `W ≃* M.group`, where `M.group` refers to the quotient of the free group on
`B` by the Coxeter relations given by the matrix `M`. See `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Basic.lean`
for more details.
We define a *reflection* (`CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`) to be an element of the form
$t = u s_i u^{-1}$, where $u \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. We say that a reflection $t$
is a *left inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`) of an element $w \in W$ if
$\ell(t w) < \ell(w)$, and we say it is a *right inversion* (`CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`) of
$w$ if $\ell(w t) > \ell(w)$. Here $\ell$ is the length function
(see `Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Length.lean`).
Given a word, we define its *left inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`) and its
*right inversion sequence* (`CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`). We prove that if a word is reduced, then
both of its inversion sequences contain no duplicates. In fact, the right (respectively, left)
inversion sequence of a reduced word for $w$ consists of all of the right (respectively, left)
inversions of $w$ in some order, but we do not prove that in this file.
## Main definitions
* `CoxeterSystem.IsReflection`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsLeftInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.IsRightInversion`
* `CoxeterSystem.leftInvSeq`
* `CoxeterSystem.rightInvSeq`
## References
* [A. Björner and F. Brenti, *Combinatorics of Coxeter Groups*](bjorner2005)
-/
namespace CoxeterSystem
open List Matrix Function
variable {B : Type*}
variable {W : Type*} [Group W]
variable {M : CoxeterMatrix B} (cs : CoxeterSystem M W)
local prefix:100 "s" => cs.simple
local prefix:100 "π" => cs.wordProd
local prefix:100 "ℓ" => cs.length
/-- `t : W` is a *reflection* of the Coxeter system `cs` if it is of the form
$w s_i w^{-1}$, where $w \in W$ and $s_i$ is a simple reflection. -/
def IsReflection (t : W) : Prop := ∃ w i, t = w * s i * w⁻¹
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Coxeter/Inversion.lean | 61 | 61 | theorem isReflection_simple (i : B) : cs.IsReflection (s i) := by | use 1, i; simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Baire.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
/-! # Open mapping theorem for morphisms of topological groups
We prove that a continuous surjective group morphism from a sigma-compact group to a locally compact
group is automatically open, in `MonoidHom.isOpenMap_of_sigmaCompact`.
We deduce this from a similar statement for the orbits of continuous actions of sigma-compact groups
on Baire spaces, given in `isOpenMap_smul_of_sigmaCompact`.
Note that a sigma-compactness assumption is necessary. Indeed, let `G` be the real line with
the discrete topology, and `H` the real line with the usual topology. Both are locally compact
groups, and the identity from `G` to `H` is continuous but not open.
-/
open scoped Topology Pointwise
open MulAction Set Function
variable {G X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G] [TopologicalSpace X]
[Group G] [TopologicalGroup G] [MulAction G X]
[SigmaCompactSpace G] [BaireSpace X] [T2Space X]
[ContinuousSMul G X] [IsPretransitive G X]
/-- Consider a sigma-compact group acting continuously and transitively on a Baire space. Then
the orbit map is open around the identity. It follows in `isOpenMap_smul_of_sigmaCompact` that it
is open around any point. -/
@[to_additive "Consider a sigma-compact additive group acting continuously and transitively on a
Baire space. Then the orbit map is open around zero. It follows in
`isOpenMap_vadd_of_sigmaCompact` that it is open around any point."]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Group/OpenMapping.lean | 37 | 88 | theorem smul_singleton_mem_nhds_of_sigmaCompact
{U : Set G} (hU : U ∈ 𝓝 1) (x : X) : U • {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by |
/- Consider a small closed neighborhood `V` of the identity. Then the group is covered by
countably many translates of `V`, say `gᵢ V`. Let also `Kₙ` be a sequence of compact sets covering
the space. Then the image of `Kₙ ∩ gᵢ V` in the orbit is compact, and their unions covers the
space. By Baire, one of them has nonempty interior. Then `gᵢ V • x` has nonempty interior, and
so does `V • x`. Its interior contains a point `g' x` with `g' ∈ V`. Then `g'⁻¹ • V • x` contains
a neighborhood of `x`, and it is included in `V⁻¹ • V • x`, which is itself contained in `U • x`
if `V` is small enough. -/
obtain ⟨V, V_mem, V_closed, V_symm, VU⟩ : ∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (1 : G), IsClosed V ∧ V⁻¹ = V ∧ V * V ⊆ U :=
exists_closed_nhds_one_inv_eq_mul_subset hU
obtain ⟨s, s_count, hs⟩ : ∃ (s : Set G), s.Countable ∧ ⋃ g ∈ s, g • V = univ := by
apply countable_cover_nhds_of_sigma_compact (fun g ↦ ?_)
convert smul_mem_nhds g V_mem
simp only [smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
let K : ℕ → Set G := compactCovering G
let F : ℕ × s → Set X := fun p ↦ (K p.1 ∩ (p.2 : G) • V) • ({x} : Set X)
obtain ⟨⟨n, ⟨g, hg⟩⟩, hi⟩ : ∃ i, (interior (F i)).Nonempty := by
have : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
have : Encodable s := Countable.toEncodable s_count
apply nonempty_interior_of_iUnion_of_closed
· rintro ⟨n, ⟨g, hg⟩⟩
apply IsCompact.isClosed
suffices H : IsCompact ((fun (g : G) ↦ g • x) '' (K n ∩ g • V)) by
simpa only [F, smul_singleton] using H
apply IsCompact.image
· exact (isCompact_compactCovering G n).inter_right (V_closed.smul g)
· exact continuous_id.smul continuous_const
· apply eq_univ_iff_forall.2 (fun y ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨h, rfl⟩ : ∃ h, h • x = y := exists_smul_eq G x y
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, h ∈ K n := exists_mem_compactCovering h
obtain ⟨g, gs, hg⟩ : ∃ g ∈ s, h ∈ g • V := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top s _ hs _
simp only [F, smul_singleton, mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_inter_iff, Prod.exists,
Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
exact ⟨n, g, gs, h, ⟨hn, hg⟩, rfl⟩
have I : (interior ((g • V) • {x})).Nonempty := by
apply hi.mono
apply interior_mono
exact smul_subset_smul_right inter_subset_right
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ : (interior (V • ({x} : Set X))).Nonempty := by
rw [smul_assoc, interior_smul] at I
exact smul_set_nonempty.1 I
obtain ⟨g', hg', rfl⟩ : ∃ g' ∈ V, g' • x = y := by simpa using interior_subset hy
have J : (g' ⁻¹ • V) • {x} ∈ 𝓝 x := by
apply mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1
rwa [smul_assoc, interior_smul, mem_inv_smul_set_iff]
have : (g'⁻¹ • V) • {x} ⊆ U • ({x} : Set X) := by
apply smul_subset_smul_right
apply Subset.trans (smul_set_subset_smul (inv_mem_inv.2 hg')) ?_
rw [V_symm]
exact VU
exact Filter.mem_of_superset J this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Mantas Bakšys. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Module.OrderedSMul
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Lex
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Support
import Mathlib.Order.Monotone.Monovary
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import algebra.order.rearrangement from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"b3f25363ae62cb169e72cd6b8b1ac97bacf21ca7"
/-!
# Rearrangement inequality
This file proves the rearrangement inequality and deduces the conditions for equality and strict
inequality.
The rearrangement inequality tells you that for two functions `f g : ι → α`, the sum
`∑ i, f i * g (σ i)` is maximized over all `σ : Perm ι` when `g ∘ σ` monovaries with `f` and
minimized when `g ∘ σ` antivaries with `f`.
The inequality also tells you that `∑ i, f i * g (σ i) = ∑ i, f i * g i` if and only if `g ∘ σ`
monovaries with `f` when `g` monovaries with `f`. The above equality also holds if and only if
`g ∘ σ` antivaries with `f` when `g` antivaries with `f`.
From the above two statements, we deduce that the inequality is strict if and only if `g ∘ σ` does
not monovary with `f` when `g` monovaries with `f`. Analogously, the inequality is strict if and
only if `g ∘ σ` does not antivary with `f` when `g` antivaries with `f`.
## Implementation notes
In fact, we don't need much compatibility between the addition and multiplication of `α`, so we can
actually decouple them by replacing multiplication with scalar multiplication and making `f` and `g`
land in different types.
As a bonus, this makes the dual statement trivial. The multiplication versions are provided for
convenience.
The case for `Monotone`/`Antitone` pairs of functions over a `LinearOrder` is not deduced in this
file because it is easily deducible from the `Monovary` API.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Scalar multiplication versions -/
section SMul
variable [LinearOrderedRing α] [LinearOrderedAddCommGroup β] [Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β]
{s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
/-- **Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when
`f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
revert hσ σ hfg
-- Porting note: Specify `p` to get around `∀ {σ}` in the current goal.
apply Finset.induction_on_max_value (fun i ↦ toLex (g i, f i))
(p := fun t ↦ ∀ {σ : Perm ι}, MonovaryOn f g t → { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ t →
(∑ i ∈ t, f i • g (σ i)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ t, f i • g i) s
· simp only [le_rfl, Finset.sum_empty, imp_true_iff]
intro a s has hamax hind σ hfg hσ
set τ : Perm ι := σ.trans (swap a (σ a)) with hτ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
intro x hx
simp only [τ, Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Equiv.coe_trans, Equiv.swap_comp_apply] at hx
split_ifs at hx with h₁ h₂
· obtain rfl | hax := eq_or_ne x a
· contradiction
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hax <| h.symm.trans h₁) hax
· exact (hx <| σ.injective h₂.symm).elim
· exact mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ hx) (ne_of_apply_ne _ h₂)
specialize hind (hfg.subset <| subset_insert _ _) hτs
simp_rw [sum_insert has]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left hind _)
obtain hσa | hσa := eq_or_ne a (σ a)
· rw [hτ, ← hσa, swap_self, trans_refl]
have h1s : σ⁻¹ a ∈ s := by
rw [Ne, ← inv_eq_iff_eq] at hσa
refine mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ fun h ↦ hσa ?_) hσa
rwa [apply_inv_self, eq_comm] at h
simp only [← s.sum_erase_add _ h1s, add_comm]
rw [← add_assoc, ← add_assoc]
simp only [hτ, swap_apply_left, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.coe_trans, apply_inv_self]
refine add_le_add (smul_add_smul_le_smul_add_smul' ?_ ?_) (sum_congr rfl fun x hx ↦ ?_).le
· specialize hamax (σ⁻¹ a) h1s
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hfg (mem_insert_of_mem h1s) (mem_insert_self _ _) hamax
· exact hamax.2
· specialize hamax (σ a) (mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (hσ <| σ.injective.ne hσa.symm) hσa.symm)
rw [Prod.Lex.le_iff] at hamax
cases' hamax with hamax hamax
· exact hamax.le
· exact hamax.1.le
· rw [mem_erase, Ne, eq_inv_iff_eq] at hx
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hx.1 (σ.injective.ne _)]
rintro rfl
exact has hx.2
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
/-- **Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`,
which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f` and `g ∘ σ` monovary
together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
classical
refine ⟨not_imp_not.1 fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ (hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ).antisymm ?_⟩
· rw [MonovaryOn] at h
push_neg at h
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hgxy, hfxy⟩ := h
set τ : Perm ι := (Equiv.swap x y).trans σ
have hτs : { x | τ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := by
refine (set_support_mul_subset σ <| swap x y).trans (Set.union_subset hσ fun z hz ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨_, rfl | rfl⟩ := swap_apply_ne_self_iff.1 hz <;> assumption
refine ((hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hτs).trans_lt' ?_).ne
obtain rfl | hxy := eq_or_ne x y
· cases lt_irrefl _ hfxy
simp only [τ, ← s.sum_erase_add _ hx,
← (s.erase x).sum_erase_add _ (mem_erase.2 ⟨hxy.symm, hy⟩),
add_assoc, Equiv.coe_trans, Function.comp_apply, swap_apply_right, swap_apply_left]
refine add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt (Finset.sum_congr rfl fun z hz ↦ ?_).le
(smul_add_smul_lt_smul_add_smul hfxy hgxy)
simp_rw [mem_erase] at hz
rw [swap_apply_of_ne_of_ne hz.2.1 hz.1]
· convert h.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul ((set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ) using 1
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, apply_inv_self]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff
/-- **Strict inequality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of
`f` and `g`, which monovary together, is strictly decreased by a permutation if and only if
`f` and `g ∘ σ` do not monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `g`. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i • g (σ i)) < ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ ¬MonovaryOn f (g ∘ σ) s := by
simp [← hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσ, lt_iff_le_and_ne,
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul hσ]
#align monovary_on.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff MonovaryOn.sum_smul_comp_perm_lt_sum_smul_iff
/-- **Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g` is maximized when
`f` and `g` monovary together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) : (∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
convert hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul
(show { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s by simp only [set_support_inv_eq, hσ]) using 1
exact σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ
#align monovary_on.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_le_sum_smul
/-- **Equality case of Rearrangement Inequality**: Pointwise scalar multiplication of `f` and `g`,
which monovary together, is unchanged by a permutation if and only if `f ∘ σ` and `g` monovary
together. Stated by permuting the entries of `f`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Rearrangement.lean | 162 | 177 | theorem MonovaryOn.sum_comp_perm_smul_eq_sum_smul_iff (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s)
(hσ : { x | σ x ≠ x } ⊆ s) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f (σ i) • g i) = ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i) ↔ MonovaryOn (f ∘ σ) g s := by |
have hσinv : { x | σ⁻¹ x ≠ x } ⊆ s := (set_support_inv_eq _).subset.trans hσ
refine (Iff.trans ?_ <| hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_eq_sum_smul_iff hσinv).trans
⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· apply eq_iff_eq_cancel_right.2
rw [σ.sum_comp' s (fun i j ↦ f i • g j) hσ]
congr
· convert h.comp_right σ
· rw [comp.assoc, inv_def, symm_comp_self, comp_id]
· rw [σ.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq, Set.image_perm hσ]
· convert h.comp_right σ.symm
· rw [comp.assoc, self_comp_symm, comp_id]
· rw [σ.symm.eq_preimage_iff_image_eq]
exact Set.image_perm hσinv
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Alex Kontorovich, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Quotient
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Polish
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.Floor
#align_import measure_theory.integral.periodic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9f55d0d4363ae59948c33864cbc52e0b12e0e8ce"
/-!
# Integrals of periodic functions
In this file we prove that the half-open interval `Ioc t (t + T)` in `ℝ` is a fundamental domain of
the action of the subgroup `ℤ ∙ T` on `ℝ`.
A consequence is `AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk`: the covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive
circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving, with respect to the restriction of Lebesgue measure to
`Ioc t (t + T)` (upstairs) and with respect to Haar measure (downstairs).
Another consequence (`Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq` and related declarations) is that
`∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x` for any (not necessarily measurable) function with
period `T`.
-/
open Set Function MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace AddSubgroup intervalIntegral
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
@[measurability]
protected theorem AddCircle.measurable_mk' {a : ℝ} :
Measurable (β := AddCircle a) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle a) :=
Continuous.measurable <| AddCircle.continuous_mk' a
#align add_circle.measurable_mk' AddCircle.measurable_mk'
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ)
(μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine this.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa only [add_comm x] using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc
theorem isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' {T : ℝ} (hT : 0 < T) (t : ℝ) (μ : Measure ℝ := by volume_tac) :
IsAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) (Ioc t (t + T)) μ := by
refine IsAddFundamentalDomain.mk' measurableSet_Ioc.nullMeasurableSet fun x => ?_
have : Bijective (codRestrict (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) _) :=
(Equiv.ofInjective (fun n : ℤ => n • T) (zsmul_strictMono_left hT).injective).bijective
refine (AddSubgroup.equivOp _).bijective.comp this |>.existsUnique_iff.2 ?_
simpa using existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc hT x t
#align is_add_fundamental_domain_Ioc' isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc'
namespace AddCircle
variable (T : ℝ) [hT : Fact (0 < T)]
/-- Equip the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` with, as a standard measure, the Haar measure of total
mass `T` -/
noncomputable instance measureSpace : MeasureSpace (AddCircle T) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.measurableSpace _ with volume := ENNReal.ofReal T • addHaarMeasure ⊤ }
#align add_circle.measure_space AddCircle.measureSpace
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-04-01
The simpNF linter now times out on this lemma. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF]
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set (AddCircle T)) = ENNReal.ofReal T := by
dsimp [volume]
rw [← PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
simp [addHaarMeasure_self (G := AddCircle T), -PositiveCompacts.coe_top]
#align add_circle.measure_univ AddCircle.measure_univ
instance : IsAddHaarMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) :=
IsAddHaarMeasure.smul _ (by simp [hT.out]) ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
instance isFiniteMeasure : IsFiniteMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) where
measure_univ_lt_top := by simp
#align add_circle.is_finite_measure AddCircle.isFiniteMeasure
instance : HasAddFundamentalDomain (AddSubgroup.op <| .zmultiples T) ℝ where
ExistsIsAddFundamentalDomain := ⟨Ioc 0 (0 + T), isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' Fact.out 0⟩
instance : AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage volume (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
apply MeasureTheory.leftInvariantIsAddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
simp [(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out 0).covolume_eq_volume, AddCircle.measure_univ]
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ (ℤ ∙ T)` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass `T`)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + T]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := AddCircle T) ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
measurePreserving_quotientAddGroup_mk_of_AddQuotientMeasureEqMeasurePreimage
volume (𝓕 := Ioc t (t+T)) (isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _) _
#align add_circle.measure_preserving_mk AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
lemma add_projection_respects_measure (t : ℝ) {U : Set (AddCircle T)} (meas_U : MeasurableSet U) :
volume U = volume (QuotientAddGroup.mk ⁻¹' U ∩ (Ioc t (t + T))) :=
(isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc' hT.out _).addProjection_respects_measure_apply
(volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) meas_U
theorem volume_closedBall {x : AddCircle T} (ε : ℝ) :
volume (Metric.closedBall x ε) = ENNReal.ofReal (min T (2 * ε)) := by
have hT' : |T| = T := abs_eq_self.mpr hT.out.le
let I := Ioc (-(T / 2)) (T / 2)
have h₁ : ε < T / 2 → Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε ∩ I = Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε := by
intro hε
rw [inter_eq_left, Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_sub, zero_add]
rintro y ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; constructor <;> linarith
have h₂ : (↑) ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall (0 : AddCircle T) ε ∩ I =
if ε < T / 2 then Metric.closedBall (0 : ℝ) ε else I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← if_ctx_congr (Iff.rfl : ε < T / 2 ↔ ε < T / 2) h₁ fun _ => rfl, ← hT']
apply coe_real_preimage_closedBall_inter_eq
simpa only [hT', Real.closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_add, zero_sub] using Ioc_subset_Icc_self
rw [addHaar_closedBall_center, add_projection_respects_measure T (-(T/2))
measurableSet_closedBall, (by linarith : -(T / 2) + T = T / 2), h₂]
by_cases hε : ε < T / 2
· simp [hε, min_eq_right (by linarith : 2 * ε ≤ T)]
· simp [I, hε, min_eq_left (by linarith : T ≤ 2 * ε)]
#align add_circle.volume_closed_ball AddCircle.volume_closedBall
instance : IsUnifLocDoublingMeasure (volume : Measure (AddCircle T)) := by
refine ⟨⟨Real.toNNReal 2, Filter.eventually_of_forall fun ε x => ?_⟩⟩
simp only [volume_closedBall]
erw [← ENNReal.ofReal_mul zero_le_two]
apply ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal
rw [mul_min_of_nonneg _ _ (zero_le_two : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 2)]
exact min_le_min (by linarith [hT.out]) (le_refl _)
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ioc a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIoc (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ioc a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIoc T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIoc T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ioc AddCircle.measurableEquivIoc
/-- The isomorphism `AddCircle T ≃ Ico a (a + T)` whose inverse is the natural quotient map,
as an equivalence of measurable spaces. -/
noncomputable def measurableEquivIco (a : ℝ) : AddCircle T ≃ᵐ Ico a (a + T) where
toEquiv := equivIco T a
measurable_toFun := measurable_of_measurable_on_compl_singleton _
(continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.mp <| ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun _x hx =>
continuousAt_equivIco T a hx).measurable
measurable_invFun := AddCircle.measurable_mk'.comp measurable_subtype_coe
#align add_circle.measurable_equiv_Ico AddCircle.measurableEquivIco
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The lower integral of a function over `AddCircle T` is equal to the lower integral over an
interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫⁻ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := lintegral_map_equiv (μ := volume) f (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq]
convert this.symm using 1
· rw [← map_comap_subtype_coe m _]
exact MeasurableEmbedding.lintegral_map (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe m) _
· congr 1
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.lintegral_preimage AddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
attribute [local instance] Subtype.measureSpace in
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + T), f a) = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
have m : MeasurableSet (Ioc t (t + T)) := measurableSet_Ioc
have := integral_map_equiv (μ := volume) (measurableEquivIoc T t).symm f
simp only [measurableEquivIoc, equivIoc, QuotientAddGroup.equivIocMod, MeasurableEquiv.symm_mk,
MeasurableEquiv.coe_mk, Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk] at this
rw [← (AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk T t).map_eq, ← integral_subtype m, ← this]
have : ((↑) : Ioc t (t + T) → AddCircle T) = ((↑) : ℝ → AddCircle T) ∘ ((↑) : _ → ℝ) := by
ext1 x; rfl
simp_rw [this]
rw [← map_map AddCircle.measurable_mk' measurable_subtype_coe, ← map_comap_subtype_coe m]
rfl
#align add_circle.integral_preimage AddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `AddCircle T` is equal
to the integral over an interval (t, t + T] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : AddCircle T → E) :
∫ a in t..t + T, f a = ∫ b : AddCircle T, f b := by
rw [integral_of_le, AddCircle.integral_preimage T t f]
linarith [hT.out]
#align add_circle.interval_integral_preimage AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end AddCircle
namespace UnitAddCircle
attribute [local instance] Real.fact_zero_lt_one
protected theorem measure_univ : volume (Set.univ : Set UnitAddCircle) = 1 := by simp
#align unit_add_circle.measure_univ UnitAddCircle.measure_univ
/-- The covering map from `ℝ` to the "unit additive circle" `ℝ ⧸ ℤ` is measure-preserving,
considered with respect to the standard measure (defined to be the Haar measure of total mass 1)
on the additive circle, and with respect to the restriction of Lebsegue measure on `ℝ` to an
interval (t, t + 1]. -/
protected theorem measurePreserving_mk (t : ℝ) :
MeasurePreserving (β := UnitAddCircle) ((↑) : ℝ → UnitAddCircle)
(volume.restrict (Ioc t (t + 1))) :=
AddCircle.measurePreserving_mk 1 t
#align unit_add_circle.measure_preserving_mk UnitAddCircle.measurePreserving_mk
/-- The integral of a measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is equal to the integral over an
interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem lintegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → ℝ≥0∞) :
(∫⁻ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫⁻ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.lintegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.lintegral_preimage UnitAddCircle.lintegral_preimage
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem integral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
(∫ a in Ioc t (t + 1), f a) = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.integral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.integral_preimage
/-- The integral of an almost-everywhere strongly measurable function over `UnitAddCircle` is
equal to the integral over an interval (t, t + 1] in `ℝ` of its lift to `ℝ`. -/
protected theorem intervalIntegral_preimage (t : ℝ) (f : UnitAddCircle → E) :
∫ a in t..t + 1, f a = ∫ b : UnitAddCircle, f b :=
AddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage 1 t f
#align unit_add_circle.interval_integral_preimage UnitAddCircle.intervalIntegral_preimage
end UnitAddCircle
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [CompleteSpace E]
namespace Function
namespace Periodic
variable {f : ℝ → E} {T : ℝ}
/-- An auxiliary lemma for a more general `Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq`. -/
theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (hf : Periodic f T) (hT : 0 < T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by
simp only [integral_of_le, hT.le, le_add_iff_nonneg_right]
haveI : VAddInvariantMeasure (AddSubgroup.zmultiples T) ℝ volume :=
⟨fun c s _ => measure_preimage_add _ _ _⟩
apply IsAddFundamentalDomain.setIntegral_eq (G := AddSubgroup.zmultiples T)
exacts [isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT t, isAddFundamentalDomain_Ioc hT s, hf.map_vadd_zmultiples]
#align function.periodic.interval_integral_add_eq_of_pos Function.Periodic.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos
/-- If `f` is a periodic function with period `T`, then its integral over `[t, t + T]` does not
depend on `t`. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Periodic.lean | 267 | 274 | theorem intervalIntegral_add_eq (hf : Periodic f T) (t s : ℝ) :
∫ x in t..t + T, f x = ∫ x in s..s + T, f x := by |
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) T with (hT | rfl | hT)
· exact hf.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos hT t s
· simp
· rw [← neg_inj, ← integral_symm, ← integral_symm]
simpa only [← sub_eq_add_neg, add_sub_cancel_right] using
hf.neg.intervalIntegral_add_eq_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hT) (t + T) (s + T)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Sophie Morel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.OperatorNorm.NormedSpace
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.CardEmbedding
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Multilinear.Topology
#align_import analysis.normed_space.multilinear from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f40476639bac089693a489c9e354ebd75dc0f886"
/-!
# Operator norm on the space of continuous multilinear maps
When `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables, we define its norm `‖f‖` as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
We show that it is indeed a norm, and prove its basic properties.
## Main results
Let `f` be a multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `exists_bound_of_continuous` asserts that, if `f` is continuous, then there exists `C > 0`
with `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`.
* `continuous_of_bound`, conversely, asserts that this bound implies continuity.
* `mkContinuous` constructs the associated continuous multilinear map.
Let `f` be a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables.
* `‖f‖` is its norm, i.e., the smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for
all `m`.
* `le_opNorm f m` asserts the fundamental inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`.
* `norm_image_sub_le f m₁ m₂` gives a control of the difference `f m₁ - f m₂` in terms of
`‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`.
## Implementation notes
We mostly follow the API (and the proofs) of `OperatorNorm.lean`, with the additional complexity
that we should deal with multilinear maps in several variables. The currying/uncurrying
constructions are based on those in `Multilinear.lean`.
From the mathematical point of view, all the results follow from the results on operator norm in
one variable, by applying them to one variable after the other through currying. However, this
is only well defined when there is an order on the variables (for instance on `Fin n`) although
the final result is independent of the order. While everything could be done following this
approach, it turns out that direct proofs are easier and more efficient.
-/
suppress_compilation
noncomputable section
open scoped NNReal Topology Uniformity
open Finset Metric Function Filter
/-
Porting note: These lines are not required in Mathlib4.
```lean
attribute [local instance 1001]
AddCommGroup.toAddCommMonoid NormedAddCommGroup.toAddCommGroup NormedSpace.toModule'
```
-/
/-!
### Type variables
We use the following type variables in this file:
* `𝕜` : a `NontriviallyNormedField`;
* `ι`, `ι'` : finite index types with decidable equality;
* `E`, `E₁` : families of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : ι`;
* `E'` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i' : ι'`;
* `Ei` : a family of normed vector spaces over `𝕜` indexed by `i : Fin (Nat.succ n)`;
* `G`, `G'` : normed vector spaces over `𝕜`.
-/
universe u v v' wE wE₁ wE' wG wG'
section Seminorm
variable {𝕜 : Type u} {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {E : ι → Type wE} {E₁ : ι → Type wE₁}
{E' : ι' → Type wE'} {G : Type wG} {G' : Type wG'} [Fintype ι]
[Fintype ι'] [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E₁ i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E₁ i)]
[∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i)]
[SeminormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
/-!
### Continuity properties of multilinear maps
We relate continuity of multilinear maps to the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, in
both directions. Along the way, we prove useful bounds on the difference `‖f m₁ - f m₂‖`.
-/
namespace MultilinearMap
variable (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)
/-- If `f` is a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables on `E` and `m` is an element
of `∀ i, E i` such that one of the `m i` has norm `0`, then `f m` has norm `0`.
Note that we cannot drop the continuity assumption because `f (m : Unit → E) = f (m ())`,
where the domain has zero norm and the codomain has a nonzero norm
does not satisfy this condition. -/
lemma norm_map_coord_zero (hf : Continuous f) {m : ∀ i, E i} {i : ι} (hi : ‖m i‖ = 0) :
‖f m‖ = 0 := by
classical
rw [← inseparable_zero_iff_norm] at hi ⊢
have : Inseparable (update m i 0) m := inseparable_pi.2 <|
(forall_update_iff m fun i a ↦ Inseparable a (m i)).2 ⟨hi.symm, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
simpa only [map_update_zero] using this.symm.map hf
theorem bound_of_shell_of_norm_map_coord_zero (hf₀ : ∀ {m i}, ‖m i‖ = 0 → ‖f m‖ = 0)
{ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ‖c i‖)
(hf : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ‖c i‖ ≤ ‖m i‖) → (∀ i, ‖m i‖ < ε i) → ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m : ∀ i, E i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
rcases em (∃ i, ‖m i‖ = 0) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | hm)
· rw [hf₀ hi, prod_eq_zero (mem_univ i) hi, mul_zero]
push_neg at hm
choose δ hδ0 hδm_lt hle_δm _ using fun i => rescale_to_shell_semi_normed (hc i) (hε i) (hm i)
have hδ0 : 0 < ∏ i, ‖δ i‖ := prod_pos fun i _ => norm_pos_iff.2 (hδ0 i)
simpa [map_smul_univ, norm_smul, prod_mul_distrib, mul_left_comm C, mul_le_mul_left hδ0] using
hf (fun i => δ i • m i) hle_δm hδm_lt
/-- If a continuous multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces satisfies
the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` on a shell `ε i / ‖c i‖ < ‖m i‖ < ε i` for some positive
numbers `ε i` and elements `c i : 𝕜`, `1 < ‖c i‖`, then it satisfies this inequality for all `m`. -/
theorem bound_of_shell_of_continuous (hfc : Continuous f)
{ε : ι → ℝ} {C : ℝ} (hε : ∀ i, 0 < ε i) {c : ι → 𝕜} (hc : ∀ i, 1 < ‖c i‖)
(hf : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, (∀ i, ε i / ‖c i‖ ≤ ‖m i‖) → (∀ i, ‖m i‖ < ε i) → ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m : ∀ i, E i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
bound_of_shell_of_norm_map_coord_zero f (norm_map_coord_zero f hfc) hε hc hf m
/-- If a multilinear map in finitely many variables on normed spaces is continuous, then it
satisfies the inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, for some `C` which can be chosen to be
positive. -/
theorem exists_bound_of_continuous (hf : Continuous f) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· refine ⟨‖f 0‖ + 1, add_pos_of_nonneg_of_pos (norm_nonneg _) zero_lt_one, fun m => ?_⟩
obtain rfl : m = 0 := funext (IsEmpty.elim ‹_›)
simp [univ_eq_empty, zero_le_one]
obtain ⟨ε : ℝ, ε0 : 0 < ε, hε : ∀ m : ∀ i, E i, ‖m - 0‖ < ε → ‖f m - f 0‖ < 1⟩ :=
NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds.1 (hf.tendsto 0) 1 zero_lt_one
simp only [sub_zero, f.map_zero] at hε
rcases NormedField.exists_one_lt_norm 𝕜 with ⟨c, hc⟩
have : 0 < (‖c‖ / ε) ^ Fintype.card ι := pow_pos (div_pos (zero_lt_one.trans hc) ε0) _
refine ⟨_, this, ?_⟩
refine f.bound_of_shell_of_continuous hf (fun _ => ε0) (fun _ => hc) fun m hcm hm => ?_
refine (hε m ((pi_norm_lt_iff ε0).2 hm)).le.trans ?_
rw [← div_le_iff' this, one_div, ← inv_pow, inv_div, Fintype.card, ← prod_const]
exact prod_le_prod (fun _ _ => div_nonneg ε0.le (norm_nonneg _)) fun i _ => hcm i
#align multilinear_map.exists_bound_of_continuous MultilinearMap.exists_bound_of_continuous
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a precise but hard to use version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound` for a less precise but more usable version. The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
C * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' [DecidableEq ι] {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
have A :
∀ s : Finset ι,
‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
C * ∑ i ∈ s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
intro s
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s his Hrec
· simp
have I :
‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
have A : (insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁ = Function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₂ i) :=
s.piecewise_insert _ _ _
have B : s.piecewise m₂ m₁ = Function.update (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) i (m₁ i) := by
simp [eq_update_iff, his]
rw [B, A, ← f.map_sub]
apply le_trans (H _)
gcongr with j
· exact fun j _ => norm_nonneg _
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp
· by_cases h' : j ∈ s <;> simp [h', h, le_refl]
calc
‖f m₁ - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ ≤
‖f m₁ - f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ +
‖f (s.piecewise m₂ m₁) - f ((insert i s).piecewise m₂ m₁)‖ := by
rw [← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm, ← dist_eq_norm]
exact dist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ (C * ∑ i ∈ s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) +
C * ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
(add_le_add Hrec I)
_ = C * ∑ i ∈ insert i s, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ := by
simp [his, add_comm, left_distrib]
convert A univ
simp
#align multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' MultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound'
/-- If `f` satisfies a boundedness property around `0`, one can deduce a bound on `f m₁ - f m₂`
using the multilinearity. Here, we give a usable but not very precise version. See
`norm_image_sub_le_of_bound'` for a more precise but less usable version. The bound is
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ C * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le_of_bound {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ := by
classical
have A :
∀ i : ι,
∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) ≤
‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by
intro i
calc
∏ j, (if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖) ≤
∏ j : ι, Function.update (fun _ => max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖) i ‖m₁ - m₂‖ j := by
apply Finset.prod_le_prod
· intro j _
by_cases h : j = i <;> simp [h, norm_nonneg]
· intro j _
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp only [ite_true, Function.update_same]
exact norm_le_pi_norm (m₁ - m₂) i
· simp [h, -le_max_iff, -max_le_iff, max_le_max, norm_le_pi_norm (_ : ∀ i, E i)]
_ = ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by
rw [prod_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_univ _)]
simp [card_univ_diff]
calc
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ C * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' hC H m₁ m₂
_ ≤ C * ∑ _i, ‖m₁ - m₂‖ * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) := by gcongr; apply A
_ = C * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ := by
rw [sum_const, card_univ, nsmul_eq_mul]
ring
#align multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound MultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound
/-- If a multilinear map satisfies an inequality `‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, then it is
continuous. -/
theorem continuous_of_bound (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : Continuous f := by
let D := max C 1
have D_pos : 0 ≤ D := le_trans zero_le_one (le_max_right _ _)
replace H (m) : ‖f m‖ ≤ D * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
(H m).trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) <| by positivity)
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun m => ?_
refine
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
(D * Fintype.card ι * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1)) fun m' h' => ?_
rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
have : max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖ ≤ ‖m‖ + 1 := by
simp [zero_le_one, norm_le_of_mem_closedBall (le_of_lt h')]
calc
‖f m' - f m‖ ≤ D * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m'‖ ‖m‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ :=
f.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound D_pos H m' m
_ ≤ D * Fintype.card ι * (‖m‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m' - m‖ := by gcongr
#align multilinear_map.continuous_of_bound MultilinearMap.continuous_of_bound
/-- Constructing a continuous multilinear map from a multilinear map satisfying a boundedness
condition. -/
def mkContinuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G :=
{ f with cont := f.continuous_of_bound C H }
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous MultilinearMap.mkContinuous
@[simp]
theorem coe_mkContinuous (C : ℝ) (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ⇑(f.mkContinuous C H) = f :=
rfl
#align multilinear_map.coe_mk_continuous MultilinearMap.coe_mkContinuous
/-- Given a multilinear map in `n` variables, if one restricts it to `k` variables putting `z` on
the other coordinates, then the resulting restricted function satisfies an inequality
`‖f.restr v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖^(n-k) * Π ‖v i‖` if the original function satisfies `‖f v‖ ≤ C * Π ‖v i‖`. -/
theorem restr_norm_le {k n : ℕ} (f : (MultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : Fin n => G) G' : _))
(s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) {C : ℝ} (H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖)
(v : Fin k → G) : ‖f.restr s hk z v‖ ≤ C * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) * ∏ i, ‖v i‖ := by
rw [mul_right_comm, mul_assoc]
convert H _ using 2
simp only [apply_dite norm, Fintype.prod_dite, prod_const ‖z‖, Finset.card_univ,
Fintype.card_of_subtype sᶜ fun _ => mem_compl, card_compl, Fintype.card_fin, hk, mk_coe, ←
(s.orderIsoOfFin hk).symm.bijective.prod_comp fun x => ‖v x‖]
convert rfl
#align multilinear_map.restr_norm_le MultilinearMap.restr_norm_le
end MultilinearMap
/-!
### Continuous multilinear maps
We define the norm `‖f‖` of a continuous multilinear map `f` in finitely many variables as the
smallest number such that `‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖` for all `m`. We show that this
defines a normed space structure on `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G`.
-/
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
variable (c : 𝕜) (f g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (m : ∀ i, E i)
theorem bound : ∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.exists_bound_of_continuous f.2
#align continuous_multilinear_map.bound ContinuousMultilinearMap.bound
open Real
/-- The operator norm of a continuous multilinear map is the inf of all its bounds. -/
def opNorm :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ }
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm
instance hasOpNorm : Norm (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨opNorm⟩
#align continuous_multilinear_map.has_op_norm ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance hasOpNorm' : Norm (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G) G') :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm
#align continuous_multilinear_map.has_op_norm' ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasOpNorm'
theorem norm_def : ‖f‖ = sInf { c | 0 ≤ (c : ℝ) ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
rfl
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_def ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_def
-- So that invocations of `le_csInf` make sense: we show that the set of
-- bounds is nonempty and bounded below.
theorem bounds_nonempty {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} :
∃ c, c ∈ { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.bound
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
#align continuous_multilinear_map.bounds_nonempty ContinuousMultilinearMap.bounds_nonempty
theorem bounds_bddBelow {f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G} :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
#align continuous_multilinear_map.bounds_bdd_below ContinuousMultilinearMap.bounds_bddBelow
theorem isLeast_opNorm : IsLeast {c : ℝ | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ c * ∏ i, ‖m i‖} ‖f‖ := by
refine IsClosed.isLeast_csInf ?_ bounds_nonempty bounds_bddBelow
simp only [Set.setOf_and, Set.setOf_forall]
exact isClosed_Ici.inter (isClosed_iInter fun m ↦
isClosed_le continuous_const (continuous_id.mul continuous_const))
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias isLeast_op_norm := isLeast_opNorm
theorem opNorm_nonneg : 0 ≤ ‖f‖ :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_nonneg ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_nonneg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_nonneg := opNorm_nonneg
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`. -/
theorem le_opNorm : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := f.isLeast_opNorm.1.2 m
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_norm := le_opNorm
variable {f m}
theorem le_mul_prod_of_le_opNorm_of_le {C : ℝ} {b : ι → ℝ} (hC : ‖f‖ ≤ C) (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b i) :
‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, b i :=
(f.le_opNorm m).trans <| mul_le_mul hC (prod_le_prod (fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _) fun _ _ ↦ hm _)
(by positivity) ((opNorm_nonneg _).trans hC)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")]
alias le_mul_prod_of_le_op_norm_of_le := le_mul_prod_of_le_opNorm_of_le
variable (f)
theorem le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le {b : ι → ℝ} (hm : ∀ i, ‖m i‖ ≤ b i) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∏ i, b i :=
le_mul_prod_of_le_opNorm_of_le le_rfl hm
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_norm_mul_prod_of_le := le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le
theorem le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le {b : ℝ} (hm : ‖m‖ ≤ b) :
‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ Fintype.card ι := by
simpa only [prod_const] using f.le_opNorm_mul_prod_of_le fun i => (norm_le_pi_norm m i).trans hm
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")]
alias le_op_norm_mul_pow_card_of_le := le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le
theorem le_opNorm_mul_pow_of_le {n : ℕ} {Ei : Fin n → Type*} [∀ i, SeminormedAddCommGroup (Ei i)]
[∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (Ei i)] (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 Ei G) {m : ∀ i, Ei i} {b : ℝ}
(hm : ‖m‖ ≤ b) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * b ^ n := by
simpa only [Fintype.card_fin] using f.le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le hm
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_norm_mul_pow_of_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNorm_mul_pow_of_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_norm_mul_pow_of_le := le_opNorm_mul_pow_of_le
variable {f} (m)
theorem le_of_opNorm_le {C : ℝ} (h : ‖f‖ ≤ C) : ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
le_mul_prod_of_le_opNorm_of_le h fun _ ↦ le_rfl
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_of_op_norm_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_of_opNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_of_op_norm_le := le_of_opNorm_le
variable (f)
theorem ratio_le_opNorm : (‖f m‖ / ∏ i, ‖m i‖) ≤ ‖f‖ :=
div_le_of_nonneg_of_le_mul (by positivity) (opNorm_nonneg _) (f.le_opNorm m)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.ratio_le_op_norm ContinuousMultilinearMap.ratio_le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias ratio_le_op_norm := ratio_le_opNorm
/-- The image of the unit ball under a continuous multilinear map is bounded. -/
theorem unit_le_opNorm (h : ‖m‖ ≤ 1) : ‖f m‖ ≤ ‖f‖ :=
(le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le f h).trans <| by simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.unit_le_op_norm ContinuousMultilinearMap.unit_le_opNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias unit_le_op_norm := unit_le_opNorm
/-- If one controls the norm of every `f x`, then one controls the norm of `f`. -/
theorem opNorm_le_bound {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M) (hM : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ M * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f‖ ≤ M :=
csInf_le bounds_bddBelow ⟨hMp, hM⟩
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_le_bound ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_bound := opNorm_le_bound
theorem opNorm_le_iff {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C) : ‖f‖ ≤ C ↔ ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ :=
⟨fun h _ ↦ le_of_opNorm_le _ h, opNorm_le_bound _ hC⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_le_iff := opNorm_le_iff
/-- The operator norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem opNorm_add_le : ‖f + g‖ ≤ ‖f‖ + ‖g‖ :=
opNorm_le_bound _ (add_nonneg (opNorm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) fun x => by
rw [add_mul]
exact norm_add_le_of_le (le_opNorm _ _) (le_opNorm _ _)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_add_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_add_le := opNorm_add_le
theorem opNorm_zero : ‖(0 : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G)‖ = 0 :=
(opNorm_nonneg _).antisymm' <| opNorm_le_bound 0 le_rfl fun m => by simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_zero ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_zero := opNorm_zero
section
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' G] [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' G]
theorem opNorm_smul_le (c : 𝕜') : ‖c • f‖ ≤ ‖c‖ * ‖f‖ :=
(c • f).opNorm_le_bound (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (opNorm_nonneg _)) fun m ↦ by
rw [smul_apply, norm_smul, mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (le_opNorm _ _) (norm_nonneg _)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_smul_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_smul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_smul_le := opNorm_smul_le
theorem opNorm_neg : ‖-f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
rw [norm_def]
apply congr_arg
ext
simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_neg ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_neg
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_neg := opNorm_neg
variable (𝕜 E G) in
/-- Operator seminorm on the space of continuous multilinear maps, as `Seminorm`.
We use this seminorm
to define a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` structure on `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G`,
but we have to override the projection `UniformSpace`
so that it is definitionally equal to the one coming from the topologies on `E` and `G`. -/
protected def seminorm : Seminorm 𝕜 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
.ofSMulLE norm opNorm_zero opNorm_add_le fun c f ↦ opNorm_smul_le f c
private lemma uniformity_eq_seminorm :
𝓤 (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) = ⨅ r > 0, 𝓟 {f | ‖f.1 - f.2‖ < r} := by
refine (ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminorm 𝕜 E G).uniformity_eq_of_hasBasis
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.hasBasis_nhds_zero_of_basis Metric.nhds_basis_closedBall)
?_ fun (s, r) ⟨hs, hr⟩ ↦ ?_
· rcases NormedField.exists_lt_norm 𝕜 1 with ⟨c, hc⟩
have hc₀ : 0 < ‖c‖ := one_pos.trans hc
simp only [hasBasis_nhds_zero.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
use 1, closedBall 0 ‖c‖, closedBall 0 1
suffices ∀ f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G, (∀ x, ‖x‖ ≤ ‖c‖ → ‖f x‖ ≤ 1) → ‖f‖ ≤ 1 by
simpa [NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_closedBall, closedBall_mem_nhds, Set.subset_def, Set.MapsTo]
intro f hf
refine opNorm_le_bound _ (by positivity) <|
f.1.bound_of_shell_of_continuous f.2 (fun _ ↦ hc₀) (fun _ ↦ hc) fun x hcx hx ↦ ?_
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ 1 := hf _ <| (pi_norm_le_iff_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg c)).2 fun i ↦ (hx i).le
_ = ∏ i : ι, 1 := by simp
_ ≤ ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := Finset.prod_le_prod (fun _ _ ↦ zero_le_one) fun i _ ↦ by
simpa only [div_self hc₀.ne'] using hcx i
_ = 1 * ∏ i, ‖x i‖ := (one_mul _).symm
· rcases (NormedSpace.isVonNBounded_iff' _).1 hs with ⟨ε, hε⟩
rcases exists_pos_mul_lt hr (ε ^ Fintype.card ι) with ⟨δ, hδ₀, hδ⟩
refine ⟨δ, hδ₀, fun f hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
simp only [Seminorm.mem_ball_zero, mem_closedBall_zero_iff] at hf ⊢
replace hf : ‖f‖ ≤ δ := hf.le
replace hx : ‖x‖ ≤ ε := hε x hx
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ε ^ Fintype.card ι := le_opNorm_mul_pow_card_of_le f hx
_ ≤ δ * ε ^ Fintype.card ι := by have := (norm_nonneg x).trans hx; gcongr
_ ≤ r := (mul_comm _ _).trans_le hδ.le
instance instPseudoMetricSpace : PseudoMetricSpace (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
.replaceUniformity
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminorm 𝕜 E G).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toPseudoMetricSpace
uniformity_eq_seminorm
/-- Continuous multilinear maps themselves form a seminormed space with respect to
the operator norm. -/
instance seminormedAddCommGroup :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminormedAddCommGroup` with non-dependent types to help
typeclass search. -/
instance seminormedAddCommGroup' :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G) G') :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.seminormedAddCommGroup
instance normedSpace : NormedSpace 𝕜' (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
⟨fun c f => f.opNorm_smul_le c⟩
#align continuous_multilinear_map.normed_space ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace
/-- An alias of `ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace` with non-dependent types to help typeclass
search. -/
instance normedSpace' : NormedSpace 𝕜' (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => G') G) :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace
#align continuous_multilinear_map.normed_space' ContinuousMultilinearMap.normedSpace'
/-- The fundamental property of the operator norm of a continuous multilinear map:
`‖f m‖` is bounded by `‖f‖` times the product of the `‖m i‖`, `nnnorm` version. -/
theorem le_opNNNorm : ‖f m‖₊ ≤ ‖f‖₊ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| by
push_cast
exact f.le_opNorm m
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_op_nnnorm ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_opNNNorm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_op_nnnorm := le_opNNNorm
theorem le_of_opNNNorm_le {C : ℝ≥0} (h : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C) : ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ :=
(f.le_opNNNorm m).trans <| mul_le_mul' h le_rfl
#align continuous_multilinear_map.le_of_op_nnnorm_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.le_of_opNNNorm_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias le_of_op_nnnorm_le := le_of_opNNNorm_le
theorem opNNNorm_le_iff {C : ℝ≥0} : ‖f‖₊ ≤ C ↔ ∀ m, ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊ := by
simp only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe]; simp [opNorm_le_iff _ C.coe_nonneg, NNReal.coe_prod]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_nnnorm_le_iff := opNNNorm_le_iff
theorem isLeast_opNNNorm : IsLeast {C : ℝ≥0 | ∀ m, ‖f m‖₊ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖₊} ‖f‖₊ := by
simpa only [← opNNNorm_le_iff] using isLeast_Ici
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias isLeast_op_nnnorm := isLeast_opNNNorm
theorem opNNNorm_prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
‖f.prod g‖₊ = max ‖f‖₊ ‖g‖₊ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ ↦ by
simp only [opNNNorm_le_iff, prod_apply, Prod.nnnorm_def', max_le_iff, forall_and]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_nnnorm_prod := opNNNorm_prod
theorem opNorm_prod (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
‖f.prod g‖ = max ‖f‖ ‖g‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (opNNNorm_prod f g)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.op_norm_prod ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_prod
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_prod := opNorm_prod
theorem opNNNorm_pi
[∀ i', SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i')] [∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')]
(f : ∀ i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i')) : ‖pi f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun _ ↦ by simpa [opNNNorm_le_iff, pi_nnnorm_le_iff] using forall_swap
theorem opNorm_pi {ι' : Type v'} [Fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'}
[∀ i', SeminormedAddCommGroup (E' i')] [∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')]
(f : ∀ i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i')) :
‖pi f‖ = ‖f‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (opNNNorm_pi f)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_pi ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_pi
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-02")] alias op_norm_pi := opNorm_pi
section
@[simp]
theorem norm_ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) (f : G →L[𝕜] G') :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
letI : Unique ι := uniqueOfSubsingleton i
simp [norm_def, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_def, (Equiv.funUnique _ _).symm.surjective.forall]
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) (f : G →L[𝕜] G') :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i f‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_ofSubsingleton i f
variable (𝕜 G)
/-- Linear isometry between continuous linear maps from `G` to `G'`
and continuous `1`-multilinear maps from `G` to `G'`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def ofSubsingletonₗᵢ [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
(G →L[𝕜] G') ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι ↦ G) G' :=
{ ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G' i with
map_add' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl
norm_map' := norm_ofSubsingleton i }
theorem norm_ofSubsingleton_id_le [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G i (.id _ _)‖ ≤ 1 := by
rw [norm_ofSubsingleton]
apply ContinuousLinearMap.norm_id_le
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_of_subsingleton_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_ofSubsingleton_id_le
theorem nnnorm_ofSubsingleton_id_le [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) :
‖ofSubsingleton 𝕜 G G i (.id _ _)‖₊ ≤ 1 :=
norm_ofSubsingleton_id_le _ _ _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.nnnorm_of_subsingleton_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.nnnorm_ofSubsingleton_id_le
variable {G} (E)
@[simp]
theorem norm_constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : G) : ‖constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg _) fun x => ?_
rw [Fintype.prod_empty, mul_one, constOfIsEmpty_apply]
· simpa using (constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x).le_opNorm 0
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_const_of_is_empty ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_constOfIsEmpty
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (x : G) : ‖constOfIsEmpty 𝕜 E x‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_constOfIsEmpty _ _ _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.nnnorm_const_of_is_empty ContinuousMultilinearMap.nnnorm_constOfIsEmpty
end
section
variable (𝕜 E E' G G')
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.prod` as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`. -/
def prodL :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G × ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜]
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G × G') where
toFun f := f.1.prod f.2
invFun f :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.fst 𝕜 G G').compContinuousMultilinearMap f,
(ContinuousLinearMap.snd 𝕜 G G').compContinuousMultilinearMap f)
map_add' f g := rfl
map_smul' c f := rfl
left_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
right_inv f := by ext <;> rfl
norm_map' f := opNorm_prod f.1 f.2
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align continuous_multilinear_map.prodL ContinuousMultilinearMap.prodL
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.pi` as a `LinearIsometryEquiv`. -/
def piₗᵢ {ι' : Type v'} [Fintype ι'] {E' : ι' → Type wE'} [∀ i', NormedAddCommGroup (E' i')]
[∀ i', NormedSpace 𝕜 (E' i')] :
@LinearIsometryEquiv 𝕜 𝕜 _ _ (RingHom.id 𝕜) _ _ _ (∀ i', ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (E' i'))
(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (∀ i, E' i)) _ _ (@Pi.module ι' _ 𝕜 _ _ fun _ => inferInstance)
_ where
toLinearEquiv := piLinearEquiv
norm_map' := opNorm_pi
#align continuous_multilinear_map.piₗᵢ ContinuousMultilinearMap.piₗᵢ
end
end
section RestrictScalars
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜' 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜' G] [IsScalarTower 𝕜' 𝕜 G]
variable [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜' (E i)] [∀ i, IsScalarTower 𝕜' 𝕜 (E i)]
@[simp]
theorem norm_restrictScalars : ‖f.restrictScalars 𝕜'‖ = ‖f‖ := rfl
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_restrict_scalars ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_restrictScalars
variable (𝕜')
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.restrictScalars` as a `LinearIsometry`. -/
def restrictScalarsₗᵢ : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →ₗᵢ[𝕜'] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜' E G where
toFun := restrictScalars 𝕜'
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
norm_map' _ := rfl
#align continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalarsₗᵢ ContinuousMultilinearMap.restrictScalarsₗᵢ
/-- `ContinuousMultilinearMap.restrictScalars` as a `ContinuousLinearMap`. -/
def restrictScalarsLinear : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜'] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜' E G :=
(restrictScalarsₗᵢ 𝕜').toContinuousLinearMap
#align continuous_multilinear_map.restrict_scalars_linear ContinuousMultilinearMap.restrictScalarsLinear
variable {𝕜'}
theorem continuous_restrictScalars :
Continuous
(restrictScalars 𝕜' : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G → ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜' E G) :=
(restrictScalarsLinear 𝕜').continuous
#align continuous_multilinear_map.continuous_restrict_scalars ContinuousMultilinearMap.continuous_restrictScalars
end RestrictScalars
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, precise version.
For a less precise but more usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le`. The bound reads
`‖f m - f m'‖ ≤
‖f‖ * ‖m 1 - m' 1‖ * max ‖m 2‖ ‖m' 2‖ * max ‖m 3‖ ‖m' 3‖ * ... * max ‖m n‖ ‖m' n‖ + ...`,
where the other terms in the sum are the same products where `1` is replaced by any `i`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le' [DecidableEq ι] (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ∑ i, ∏ j, if j = i then ‖m₁ i - m₂ i‖ else max ‖m₁ j‖ ‖m₂ j‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound' (norm_nonneg _) f.le_opNorm _ _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le' ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le'
/-- The difference `f m₁ - f m₂` is controlled in terms of `‖f‖` and `‖m₁ - m₂‖`, less precise
version. For a more precise but less usable version, see `norm_image_sub_le'`.
The bound is `‖f m - f m'‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * card ι * ‖m - m'‖ * (max ‖m‖ ‖m'‖) ^ (card ι - 1)`. -/
theorem norm_image_sub_le (m₁ m₂ : ∀ i, E i) :
‖f m₁ - f m₂‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * Fintype.card ι * max ‖m₁‖ ‖m₂‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖m₁ - m₂‖ :=
f.toMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le_of_bound (norm_nonneg _) f.le_opNorm _ _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_image_sub_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_image_sub_le
/-- Applying a multilinear map to a vector is continuous in both coordinates. -/
theorem continuous_eval : Continuous
fun p : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G × ∀ i, E i => p.1 p.2 := by
apply continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun p => ?_
apply
continuousAt_of_locally_lipschitz zero_lt_one
((‖p‖ + 1) * Fintype.card ι * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) + ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖) fun q hq => ?_
have : 0 ≤ max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖ := by simp
have : 0 ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 := zero_le_one.trans ((le_add_iff_nonneg_left 1).2 <| norm_nonneg p)
have A : ‖q‖ ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 := norm_le_of_mem_closedBall hq.le
have : max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖ ≤ ‖p‖ + 1 :=
(max_le_max (norm_snd_le q) (norm_snd_le p)).trans (by simp [A, zero_le_one])
have : ∀ i : ι, i ∈ univ → 0 ≤ ‖p.2 i‖ := fun i _ => norm_nonneg _
calc
dist (q.1 q.2) (p.1 p.2) ≤ dist (q.1 q.2) (q.1 p.2) + dist (q.1 p.2) (p.1 p.2) :=
dist_triangle _ _ _
_ = ‖q.1 q.2 - q.1 p.2‖ + ‖q.1 p.2 - p.1 p.2‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm, dist_eq_norm]
_ ≤ ‖q.1‖ * Fintype.card ι * max ‖q.2‖ ‖p.2‖ ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖q.2 - p.2‖ +
‖q.1 - p.1‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖ :=
(add_le_add (norm_image_sub_le _ _ _) ((q.1 - p.1).le_opNorm p.2))
_ ≤ (‖p‖ + 1) * Fintype.card ι * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) * ‖q - p‖ +
‖q - p‖ * ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖ := by
apply_rules [add_le_add, mul_le_mul, le_refl, le_trans (norm_fst_le q) A, Nat.cast_nonneg,
mul_nonneg, pow_le_pow_left, pow_nonneg, norm_snd_le (q - p), norm_nonneg,
norm_fst_le (q - p), prod_nonneg]
_ = ((‖p‖ + 1) * Fintype.card ι * (‖p‖ + 1) ^ (Fintype.card ι - 1) + ∏ i, ‖p.2 i‖)
* dist q p := by
rw [dist_eq_norm]
ring
#align continuous_multilinear_map.continuous_eval ContinuousMultilinearMap.continuous_eval
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mkContinuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
theorem MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous C H‖ ≤ C :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ hC fun m => H m
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le
/-- If a continuous multilinear map is constructed from a multilinear map via the constructor
`mkContinuous`, then its norm is bounded by the bound given to the constructor if it is
nonnegative. -/
theorem MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le' (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m, ‖f m‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖f.mkContinuous C H‖ ≤ max C 0 :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (le_max_right _ _) fun m ↦ (H m).trans <|
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (le_max_left _ _) <| by positivity
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_norm_le' MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le'
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
/-- Given a continuous multilinear map `f` on `n` variables (parameterized by `Fin n`) and a subset
`s` of `k` of these variables, one gets a new continuous multilinear map on `Fin k` by varying
these variables, and fixing the other ones equal to a given value `z`. It is denoted by
`f.restr s hk z`, where `hk` is a proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. The implicit
identification between `Fin k` and `s` that we use is the canonical (increasing) bijection. -/
def restr {k n : ℕ} (f : (G[×n]→L[𝕜] G' : _)) (s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) :
G[×k]→L[𝕜] G' :=
(f.toMultilinearMap.restr s hk z).mkContinuous (‖f‖ * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k)) fun _ =>
MultilinearMap.restr_norm_le _ _ _ _ f.le_opNorm _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.restr ContinuousMultilinearMap.restr
theorem norm_restr {k n : ℕ} (f : G[×n]→L[𝕜] G') (s : Finset (Fin n)) (hk : s.card = k) (z : G) :
‖f.restr s hk z‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖z‖ ^ (n - k) := by
apply MultilinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le
exact mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (pow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_restr ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_restr
section
variable {A : Type*} [NormedCommRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra_le [Nonempty ι] : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ ≤ 1 := by
refine opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun m => ?_
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra_apply, one_mul]
exact norm_prod_le' _ univ_nonempty _
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebra_le
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra_of_empty [IsEmpty ι] :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ := by
apply le_antisymm
· apply opNorm_le_bound <;> simp
· -- Porting note: have to annotate types to get mvars to unify
convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A) fun _ => (1 : A)
simp [eq_empty_of_isEmpty (univ : Finset ι)]
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_of_empty ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebra_of_empty
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebra [NormOneClass A] : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A‖ = 1 := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp [norm_mkPiAlgebra_of_empty]
· refine le_antisymm norm_mkPiAlgebra_le ?_
convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebra 𝕜 ι A) fun _ => 1
simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebra
end
section
variable {n : ℕ} {A : Type*} [NormedRing A] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 A]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n.succ A‖ ≤ 1 := by
refine opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun m => ?_
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin_apply, one_mul, List.ofFn_eq_map,
Fin.prod_univ_def, Multiset.map_coe, Multiset.prod_coe]
refine (List.norm_prod_le' ?_).trans_eq ?_
· rw [Ne, List.map_eq_nil, List.finRange_eq_nil]
exact Nat.succ_ne_zero _
rw [List.map_map, Function.comp_def]
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_succ_le ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le_of_pos (hn : 0 < n) :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n A‖ ≤ 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hn.ne'
exact norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_le_of_pos ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_le_of_pos
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 0 A‖ = ‖(1 : A)‖ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine opNorm_le_bound _ (norm_nonneg (1 : A)) ?_
simp
· convert ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 0 A) fun _ => (1 : A)
simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin_zero ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiAlgebraFin [NormOneClass A] :
‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 n A‖ = 1 := by
cases n
· rw [norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_zero]
simp
· refine le_antisymm norm_mkPiAlgebraFin_succ_le ?_
refine le_of_eq_of_le ?_ <|
ratio_le_opNorm (ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiAlgebraFin 𝕜 (Nat.succ _) A) fun _ => 1
simp
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_algebra_fin ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiAlgebraFin
end
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_smulRight (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
‖f.smulRight z‖₊ = ‖f‖₊ * ‖z‖₊ := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· refine (opNNNorm_le_iff _ |>.2 fun m => (nnnorm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_)
rw [mul_right_comm]
gcongr
exact le_opNNNorm _ _
· obtain hz | hz := eq_or_ne ‖z‖₊ 0
· simp [hz]
rw [← NNReal.le_div_iff hz, opNNNorm_le_iff]
intro m
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, NNReal.le_div_iff hz]
refine le_trans ?_ ((f.smulRight z).le_opNNNorm m)
rw [smulRight_apply, nnnorm_smul]
@[simp]
theorem norm_smulRight (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
‖f.smulRight z‖ = ‖f‖ * ‖z‖ :=
congr_arg NNReal.toReal (nnnorm_smulRight f z)
@[simp]
theorem norm_mkPiRing (z : G) : ‖ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 ι z‖ = ‖z‖ := by
rw [ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing, norm_smulRight, norm_mkPiAlgebra, one_mul]
#align continuous_multilinear_map.norm_mk_pi_field ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_mkPiRing
variable (𝕜 E G) in
/-- Continuous bilinear map realizing `(f, z) ↦ f.smulRight z`. -/
def smulRightL : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜 →L[𝕜] G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
{ toFun := fun f ↦
{ toFun := fun z ↦ f.smulRight z
map_add' := fun x y ↦ by ext; simp
map_smul' := fun c x ↦ by ext; simp [smul_smul, mul_comm] }
map_add' := fun f g ↦ by ext; simp [add_smul]
map_smul' := fun c f ↦ by ext; simp [smul_smul] }
1 (fun f z ↦ by simp [norm_smulRight])
@[simp] lemma smulRightL_apply (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜) (z : G) :
smulRightL 𝕜 E G f z = f.smulRight z := rfl
#adaptation_note
/--
Before https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/4119 we had to create a local instance:
```
letI : SeminormedAddCommGroup
(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E 𝕜 →L[𝕜] G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :=
ContinuousLinearMap.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
(F := G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) (σ₁₂ := RingHom.id 𝕜)
```
-/
set_option maxSynthPendingDepth 2 in
lemma norm_smulRightL_le : ‖smulRightL 𝕜 E G‖ ≤ 1 :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂_norm_le _ zero_le_one _
variable (𝕜 ι G)
/-- Continuous multilinear maps on `𝕜^n` with values in `G` are in bijection with `G`, as such a
continuous multilinear map is completely determined by its value on the constant vector made of
ones. We register this bijection as a linear isometry in
`ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv`. -/
protected def piFieldEquiv : G ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 (fun _ : ι => 𝕜) G where
toFun z := ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 ι z
invFun f := f fun i => 1
map_add' z z' := by
ext m
simp [smul_add]
map_smul' c z := by
ext m
simp [smul_smul, mul_comm]
left_inv z := by simp
right_inv f := f.mkPiRing_apply_one_eq_self
norm_map' := norm_mkPiRing
#align continuous_multilinear_map.pi_field_equiv ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv
end ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace ContinuousLinearMap
theorem norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le (g : G →L[𝕜] G') (f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.compContinuousMultilinearMap f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ‖f‖ :=
ContinuousMultilinearMap.opNorm_le_bound _ (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (norm_nonneg _)) fun m =>
calc
‖g (f m)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * (‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) := g.le_opNorm_of_le <| f.le_opNorm _
_ = _ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align continuous_linear_map.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map_le ContinuousLinearMap.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le
variable (𝕜 E G G')
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap` as a bundled continuous bilinear map. -/
def compContinuousMultilinearMapL :
(G →L[𝕜] G') →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous₂
(LinearMap.mk₂ 𝕜 compContinuousMultilinearMap (fun f₁ f₂ g => rfl) (fun c f g => rfl)
(fun f g₁ g₂ => by ext1; apply f.map_add)
(fun c f g => by ext1; simp))
1
fun f g => by rw [one_mul]; exact f.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap_le g
#align continuous_linear_map.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMapL
variable {𝕜 G G'}
/-- `ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap` as a bundled
continuous linear equiv. -/
nonrec
def _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G ≃L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
{ compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G G' g.toContinuousLinearMap with
invFun := compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G' G g.symm.toContinuousLinearMap
left_inv := by
intro f
ext1 m
simp [compContinuousMultilinearMapL]
right_inv := by
intro f
ext1 m
simp [compContinuousMultilinearMapL]
continuous_toFun := (compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G G' g.toContinuousLinearMap).continuous
continuous_invFun :=
(compContinuousMultilinearMapL 𝕜 E G' G g.symm.toContinuousLinearMap).continuous }
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_symm (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G') :
(g.compContinuousMultilinearMapL E).symm = g.symm.compContinuousMultilinearMapL E :=
rfl
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL_symm ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_symm
variable {E}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_apply (g : G ≃L[𝕜] G')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
g.compContinuousMultilinearMapL E f = (g : G →L[𝕜] G').compContinuousMultilinearMap f :=
rfl
#align continuous_linear_equiv.comp_continuous_multilinear_mapL_apply ContinuousLinearEquiv.compContinuousMultilinearMapL_apply
/-- Flip arguments in `f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'` to get
`ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G')` -/
@[simps! apply_apply]
def flipMultilinear (f : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (G →L[𝕜] G') :=
MultilinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun m =>
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun x => f x m
map_add' := fun x y => by simp only [map_add, ContinuousMultilinearMap.add_apply]
map_smul' := fun c x => by
simp only [ContinuousMultilinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul, RingHom.id_apply] }
(‖f‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) fun x => by
rw [mul_right_comm]
exact (f x).le_of_opNorm_le _ (f.le_opNorm x)
map_add' := fun m i x y => by
ext1
simp only [add_apply, ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_add, LinearMap.coe_mk,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, AddHom.coe_mk]
map_smul' := fun m i c x => by
ext1
simp only [coe_smul', ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_smul, LinearMap.coe_mk,
LinearMap.mkContinuous_apply, Pi.smul_apply, AddHom.coe_mk] }
‖f‖ fun m => by
dsimp only [MultilinearMap.coe_mk]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (by positivity) _
#align continuous_linear_map.flip_multilinear ContinuousLinearMap.flipMultilinear
#align continuous_linear_map.flip_multilinear_apply_apply ContinuousLinearMap.flipMultilinear_apply_apply
end ContinuousLinearMap
theorem LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap (g : G →ₗᵢ[𝕜] G')
(f : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) :
‖g.toContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap f‖ = ‖f‖ := by
simp only [ContinuousLinearMap.compContinuousMultilinearMap_coe,
LinearIsometry.coe_toContinuousLinearMap, LinearIsometry.norm_map,
ContinuousMultilinearMap.norm_def, Function.comp_apply]
#align linear_isometry.norm_comp_continuous_multilinear_map LinearIsometry.norm_compContinuousMultilinearMap
open ContinuousMultilinearMap
namespace MultilinearMap
/-- Given a map `f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'` and an estimate
`H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖`, construct a continuous linear
map from `G` to `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G'`.
In order to lift, e.g., a map `f : (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`
to a map `(ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G) →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`,
one can apply this construction to `f.comp ContinuousMultilinearMap.toMultilinearMapLinear`
which is a linear map from `ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G` to `MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G'`. -/
def mkContinuousLinear (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : G →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E G' :=
LinearMap.mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun x => (f x).mkContinuous (C * ‖x‖) <| H x
map_add' := fun x y => by
ext1
simp only [_root_.map_add]
rfl
map_smul' := fun c x => by
ext1
simp only [_root_.map_smul]
rfl }
(max C 0) fun x => by
rw [LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk] -- Porting note: added
exact ((f x).mkContinuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq <| by
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg _ _ (norm_nonneg x), zero_mul]
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_linear MultilinearMap.mkContinuousLinear
theorem mkContinuousLinear_norm_le' (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖mkContinuousLinear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 := by
dsimp only [mkContinuousLinear]
exact LinearMap.mkContinuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_linear_norm_le' MultilinearMap.mkContinuousLinear_norm_le'
theorem mkContinuousLinear_norm_le (f : G →ₗ[𝕜] MultilinearMap 𝕜 E G') {C : ℝ} (hC : 0 ≤ C)
(H : ∀ x m, ‖f x m‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖ * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) : ‖mkContinuousLinear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mkContinuousLinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_linear_norm_le MultilinearMap.mkContinuousLinear_norm_le
/-- Given a map `f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)` and an estimate
`H : ∀ m m', ‖f m m'‖ ≤ C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ * ∏ i, ‖m' i‖`, upgrade all `MultilinearMap`s in the type to
`ContinuousMultilinearMap`s. -/
def mkContinuousMultilinear (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E (ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G) :=
mkContinuous
{ toFun := fun m => mkContinuous (f m) (C * ∏ i, ‖m i‖) <| H m
map_add' := fun m i x y => by
ext1
simp
map_smul' := fun m i c x => by
ext1
simp }
(max C 0) fun m => by
simp only [coe_mk]
refine ((f m).mkContinuous_norm_le' _).trans_eq ?_
rw [max_mul_of_nonneg, zero_mul]
positivity
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear MultilinearMap.mkContinuousMultilinear
@[simp]
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_apply (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) (m : ∀ i, E i) :
⇑(mkContinuousMultilinear f C H m) = f m :=
rfl
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear_apply MultilinearMap.mkContinuousMultilinear_apply
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le' (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) (C : ℝ)
(H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mkContinuousMultilinear f C H‖ ≤ max C 0 := by
dsimp only [mkContinuousMultilinear]
exact mkContinuous_norm_le _ (le_max_right _ _) _
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le' MultilinearMap.mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le'
theorem mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le (f : MultilinearMap 𝕜 E (MultilinearMap 𝕜 E' G)) {C : ℝ}
(hC : 0 ≤ C) (H : ∀ m₁ m₂, ‖f m₁ m₂‖ ≤ (C * ∏ i, ‖m₁ i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m₂ i‖) :
‖mkContinuousMultilinear f C H‖ ≤ C :=
(mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le' f C H).trans_eq (max_eq_left hC)
#align multilinear_map.mk_continuous_multilinear_norm_le MultilinearMap.mkContinuousMultilinear_norm_le
end MultilinearMap
namespace ContinuousMultilinearMap
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
| Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/Multilinear/Basic.lean | 1,131 | 1,140 | theorem norm_compContinuousLinearMap_le (g : ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 E₁ G)
(f : ∀ i, E i →L[𝕜] E₁ i) : ‖g.compContinuousLinearMap f‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖ :=
opNorm_le_bound _ (by positivity) fun m =>
calc
‖g fun i => f i (m i)‖ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i (m i)‖ := g.le_opNorm _
_ ≤ ‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖ * ‖m i‖ :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left
(prod_le_prod (fun _ _ => norm_nonneg _) fun i _ => (f i).le_opNorm (m i))
(norm_nonneg g))
_ = (‖g‖ * ∏ i, ‖f i‖) * ∏ i, ‖m i‖ := by | rw [prod_mul_distrib, mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson, Jesse Michael Han, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Prod
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.LanguageMap
#align_import model_theory.syntax from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d565b3df44619c1498326936be16f1a935df0728"
/-!
# Basics on First-Order Syntax
This file defines first-order terms, formulas, sentences, and theories in a style inspired by the
[Flypitch project](https://flypitch.github.io/).
## Main Definitions
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Term` is defined so that `L.Term α` is the type of `L`-terms with free
variables indexed by `α`.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Formula` is defined so that `L.Formula α` is the type of `L`-formulas with
free variables indexed by `α`.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Sentence` is a formula with no free variables.
* A `FirstOrder.Language.Theory` is a set of sentences.
* The variables of terms and formulas can be relabelled with `FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel`,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel`, and `FirstOrder.Language.Formula.relabel`.
* Given an operation on terms and an operation on relations,
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel` gives an operation on formulas.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE` adds more `Fin`-indexed variables.
* `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt` raises the indexes of the `Fin`-indexed variables
above a particular index.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst` and `FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.subst` substitute
variables with given terms.
* Language maps can act on syntactic objects with functions such as
`FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onFormula`.
* `FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv` and
`FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv` switch terms and formulas between having
constants in the language and having extra variables indexed by the same type.
## Implementation Notes
* Formulas use a modified version of de Bruijn variables. Specifically, a `L.BoundedFormula α n`
is a formula with some variables indexed by a type `α`, which cannot be quantified over, and some
indexed by `Fin n`, which can. For any `φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)`, we define the formula
`∀' φ : L.BoundedFormula α n` by universally quantifying over the variable indexed by
`n : Fin (n + 1)`.
## References
For the Flypitch project:
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formal proof of the independence of the continuum hypothesis*]
[flypitch_cpp]
- [J. Han, F. van Doorn, *A formalization of forcing and the unprovability of
the continuum hypothesis*][flypitch_itp]
-/
universe u v w u' v'
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
variable (L : Language.{u, v}) {L' : Language}
variable {M : Type w} {N P : Type*} [L.Structure M] [L.Structure N] [L.Structure P]
variable {α : Type u'} {β : Type v'} {γ : Type*}
open FirstOrder
open Structure Fin
/-- A term on `α` is either a variable indexed by an element of `α`
or a function symbol applied to simpler terms. -/
inductive Term (α : Type u') : Type max u u'
| var : α → Term α
| func : ∀ {l : ℕ} (_f : L.Functions l) (_ts : Fin l → Term α), Term α
#align first_order.language.term FirstOrder.Language.Term
export Term (var func)
variable {L}
namespace Term
open Finset
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinset [DecidableEq α] : L.Term α → Finset α
| var i => {i}
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinset
#align first_order.language.term.var_finset FirstOrder.Language.Term.varFinset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- The `Finset` of variables from the left side of a sum used in a given term. -/
@[simp]
def varFinsetLeft [DecidableEq α] : L.Term (Sum α β) → Finset α
| var (Sum.inl i) => {i}
| var (Sum.inr _i) => ∅
| func _f ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
#align first_order.language.term.var_finset_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.varFinsetLeft
-- Porting note: universes in different order
@[simp]
def relabel (g : α → β) : L.Term α → L.Term β
| var i => var (g i)
| func f ts => func f fun {i} => (ts i).relabel g
#align first_order.language.term.relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel
theorem relabel_id (t : L.Term α) : t.relabel id = t := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_id FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_id_eq_id : (Term.relabel id : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id :=
funext relabel_id
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_id_eq_id FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_id_eq_id
@[simp]
theorem relabel_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (t : L.Term α) :
(t.relabel f).relabel g = t.relabel (g ∘ f) := by
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp [ih]
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_relabel
@[simp]
theorem relabel_comp_relabel (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) :
(Term.relabel g ∘ Term.relabel f : L.Term α → L.Term γ) = Term.relabel (g ∘ f) :=
funext (relabel_relabel f g)
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_comp_relabel FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabel_comp_relabel
/-- Relabels a term's variables along a bijection. -/
@[simps]
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) : L.Term α ≃ L.Term β :=
⟨relabel g, relabel g.symm, fun t => by simp, fun t => by simp⟩
#align first_order.language.term.relabel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Term.relabelEquiv
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables. -/
def restrictVar [DecidableEq α] : ∀ (t : L.Term α) (_f : t.varFinset → β), L.Term β
| var a, f => var (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i => (ts i).restrictVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => varFinset (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.restrict_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.restrictVar
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a term to use only a set of the given variables on the left side of a sum. -/
def restrictVarLeft [DecidableEq α] {γ : Type*} :
∀ (t : L.Term (Sum α γ)) (_f : t.varFinsetLeft → β), L.Term (Sum β γ)
| var (Sum.inl a), f => var (Sum.inl (f ⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩))
| var (Sum.inr a), _f => var (Sum.inr a)
| func F ts, f =>
func F fun i =>
(ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion (subset_biUnion_of_mem
(fun i => varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
#align first_order.language.term.restrict_var_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.restrictVarLeft
end Term
/-- The representation of a constant symbol as a term. -/
def Constants.term (c : L.Constants) : L.Term α :=
func c default
#align first_order.language.constants.term FirstOrder.Language.Constants.term
/-- Applies a unary function to a term. -/
def Functions.apply₁ (f : L.Functions 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t]
#align first_order.language.functions.apply₁ FirstOrder.Language.Functions.apply₁
/-- Applies a binary function to two terms. -/
def Functions.apply₂ (f : L.Functions 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Term α :=
func f ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.functions.apply₂ FirstOrder.Language.Functions.apply₂
namespace Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Sends a term with constants to a term with extra variables. -/
@[simp]
def constantsToVars : L[[γ]].Term α → L.Term (Sum γ α)
| var a => var (Sum.inr a)
| @func _ _ 0 f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => var (Sum.inl c)
| @func _ _ (_n + 1) f ts =>
Sum.casesOn f (fun f => func f fun i => (ts i).constantsToVars) fun c => isEmptyElim c
#align first_order.language.term.constants_to_vars FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsToVars
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Sends a term with extra variables to a term with constants. -/
@[simp]
def varsToConstants : L.Term (Sum γ α) → L[[γ]].Term α
| var (Sum.inr a) => var a
| var (Sum.inl c) => Constants.term (Sum.inr c)
| func f ts => func (Sum.inl f) fun i => (ts i).varsToConstants
#align first_order.language.term.vars_to_constants FirstOrder.Language.Term.varsToConstants
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
@[simps]
def constantsVarsEquiv : L[[γ]].Term α ≃ L.Term (Sum γ α) :=
⟨constantsToVars, varsToConstants, by
intro t
induction' t with _ n f _ ih
· rfl
· cases n
· cases f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, Constants.term, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· cases' f with f f
· simp [constantsToVars, varsToConstants, ih]
· exact isEmptyElim f, by
intro t
induction' t with x n f _ ih
· cases x <;> rfl
· cases n <;> · simp [varsToConstants, constantsToVars, ih]⟩
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquiv
/-- A bijection between terms with constants and terms with extra variables. -/
def constantsVarsEquivLeft : L[[γ]].Term (Sum α β) ≃ L.Term (Sum (Sum γ α) β) :=
constantsVarsEquiv.trans (relabelEquiv (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)).symm
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply (t : L[[γ]].Term (Sum α β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft t = (constantsToVars t).relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _).symm :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left_apply FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_apply
@[simp]
theorem constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply (t : L.Term (Sum (Sum γ α) β)) :
constantsVarsEquivLeft.symm t = varsToConstants (t.relabel (Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _)) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.term.constants_vars_equiv_left_symm_apply FirstOrder.Language.Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply
instance inhabitedOfVar [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨var default⟩
#align first_order.language.term.inhabited_of_var FirstOrder.Language.Term.inhabitedOfVar
instance inhabitedOfConstant [Inhabited L.Constants] : Inhabited (L.Term α) :=
⟨(default : L.Constants).term⟩
#align first_order.language.term.inhabited_of_constant FirstOrder.Language.Term.inhabitedOfConstant
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a term greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt {n : ℕ} (n' m : ℕ) : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L.Term (Sum α (Fin (n + n'))) :=
relabel (Sum.map id fun i => if ↑i < m then Fin.castAdd n' i else Fin.addNat i n')
#align first_order.language.term.lift_at FirstOrder.Language.Term.liftAt
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Substitutes the variables in a given term with terms. -/
@[simp]
def subst : L.Term α → (α → L.Term β) → L.Term β
| var a, tf => tf a
| func f ts, tf => func f fun i => (ts i).subst tf
#align first_order.language.term.subst FirstOrder.Language.Term.subst
end Term
scoped[FirstOrder] prefix:arg "&" => FirstOrder.Language.Term.var ∘ Sum.inr
namespace LHom
open Term
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language map. -/
@[simp]
def onTerm (φ : L →ᴸ L') : L.Term α → L'.Term α
| var i => var i
| func f ts => func (φ.onFunction f) fun i => onTerm φ (ts i)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.onTerm
@[simp]
theorem id_onTerm : ((LHom.id L).onTerm : L.Term α → L.Term α) = id := by
ext t
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [onTerm, ih]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.id_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.id_onTerm
@[simp]
theorem comp_onTerm {L'' : Language} (φ : L' →ᴸ L'') (ψ : L →ᴸ L') :
((φ.comp ψ).onTerm : L.Term α → L''.Term α) = φ.onTerm ∘ ψ.onTerm := by
ext t
induction' t with _ _ _ _ ih
· rfl
· simp_rw [onTerm, ih]
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.LHom.comp_on_term FirstOrder.Language.LHom.comp_onTerm
end LHom
/-- Maps a term's symbols along a language equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def Lequiv.onTerm (φ : L ≃ᴸ L') : L.Term α ≃ L'.Term α where
toFun := φ.toLHom.onTerm
invFun := φ.invLHom.onTerm
left_inv := by
rw [Function.leftInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.left_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
right_inv := by
rw [Function.rightInverse_iff_comp, ← LHom.comp_onTerm, φ.right_inv, LHom.id_onTerm]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Lequiv.on_term FirstOrder.Language.Lequiv.onTerm
variable (L) (α)
/-- `BoundedFormula α n` is the type of formulas with free variables indexed by `α` and up to `n`
additional free variables. -/
inductive BoundedFormula : ℕ → Type max u v u'
| falsum {n} : BoundedFormula n
| equal {n} (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| rel {n l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations l) (ts : Fin l → L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : BoundedFormula n
| imp {n} (f₁ f₂ : BoundedFormula n) : BoundedFormula n
| all {n} (f : BoundedFormula (n + 1)) : BoundedFormula n
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula
/-- `Formula α` is the type of formulas with all free variables indexed by `α`. -/
abbrev Formula :=
L.BoundedFormula α 0
#align first_order.language.formula FirstOrder.Language.Formula
/-- A sentence is a formula with no free variables. -/
abbrev Sentence :=
L.Formula Empty
#align first_order.language.sentence FirstOrder.Language.Sentence
/-- A theory is a set of sentences. -/
abbrev Theory :=
Set L.Sentence
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align first_order.language.Theory FirstOrder.Language.Theory
variable {L} {α} {n : ℕ}
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula {l : ℕ} (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term (Sum α (Fin l))) :
L.BoundedFormula α l :=
BoundedFormula.rel R ts
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t]
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula₁ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula₁
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.boundedFormula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) :
L.BoundedFormula α n :=
r.boundedFormula ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.relations.bounded_formula₂ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.boundedFormula₂
/-- The equality of two terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Term.bdEqual (t₁ t₂ : L.Term (Sum α (Fin n))) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
BoundedFormula.equal t₁ t₂
#align first_order.language.term.bd_equal FirstOrder.Language.Term.bdEqual
/-- Applies a relation to terms as a bounded formula. -/
def Relations.formula (R : L.Relations n) (ts : Fin n → L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
R.boundedFormula fun i => (ts i).relabel Sum.inl
#align first_order.language.relations.formula FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula
/-- Applies a unary relation to a term as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₁ (r : L.Relations 1) (t : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t]
#align first_order.language.relations.formula₁ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula₁
/-- Applies a binary relation to two terms as a formula. -/
def Relations.formula₂ (r : L.Relations 2) (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
r.formula ![t₁, t₂]
#align first_order.language.relations.formula₂ FirstOrder.Language.Relations.formula₂
/-- The equality of two terms as a first-order formula. -/
def Term.equal (t₁ t₂ : L.Term α) : L.Formula α :=
(t₁.relabel Sum.inl).bdEqual (t₂.relabel Sum.inl)
#align first_order.language.term.equal FirstOrder.Language.Term.equal
namespace BoundedFormula
instance : Inhabited (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
instance : Bot (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨falsum⟩
/-- The negation of a bounded formula is also a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def not (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.imp ⊥
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.not FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.not
/-- Puts an `∃` quantifier on a bounded formula. -/
@[match_pattern]
protected def ex (φ : L.BoundedFormula α (n + 1)) : L.BoundedFormula α n :=
φ.not.all.not
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.ex FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.ex
instance : Top (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨BoundedFormula.not ⊥⟩
instance : Inf (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => (f.imp g.not).not⟩
instance : Sup (L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
⟨fun f g => f.not.imp g⟩
/-- The biimplication between two bounded formulas. -/
protected def iff (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :=
φ.imp ψ ⊓ ψ.imp φ
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.iff FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.iff
open Finset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- The `Finset` of variables used in a given formula. -/
@[simp]
def freeVarFinset [DecidableEq α] : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → Finset α
| _n, falsum => ∅
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => t₁.varFinsetLeft ∪ t₂.varFinsetLeft
| _n, rel _R ts => univ.biUnion fun i => (ts i).varFinsetLeft
| _n, imp f₁ f₂ => f₁.freeVarFinset ∪ f₂.freeVarFinset
| _n, all f => f.freeVarFinset
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.free_var_finset FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.freeVarFinset
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Casts `L.BoundedFormula α m` as `L.BoundedFormula α n`, where `m ≤ n`. -/
@[simp]
def castLE : ∀ {m n : ℕ} (_h : m ≤ n), L.BoundedFormula α m → L.BoundedFormula α n
| _m, _n, _h, falsum => falsum
| _m, _n, h, equal t₁ t₂ =>
equal (t₁.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h))) (t₂.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)))
| _m, _n, h, rel R ts => rel R (Term.relabel (Sum.map id (Fin.castLE h)) ∘ ts)
| _m, _n, h, imp f₁ f₂ => (f₁.castLE h).imp (f₂.castLE h)
| _m, _n, h, all f => (f.castLE (add_le_add_right h 1)).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE
@[simp]
theorem castLE_rfl {n} (h : n ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) : φ.castLE h = φ := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih1, ih2]
· simp [Fin.castLE_of_eq, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_rfl FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_rfl
@[simp]
theorem castLE_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.castLE km).castLE mn = φ.castLE (km.trans mn) := by
revert m n
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3 <;> intro m n km mn
· rfl
· simp
· simp only [castLE, eq_self_iff_true, heq_iff_eq, true_and_iff]
rw [← Function.comp.assoc, Term.relabel_comp_relabel]
simp
· simp [ih1, ih2]
· simp only [castLE, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_castLE
@[simp]
theorem castLE_comp_castLE {k m n} (km : k ≤ m) (mn : m ≤ n) :
(BoundedFormula.castLE mn ∘ BoundedFormula.castLE km :
L.BoundedFormula α k → L.BoundedFormula α n) =
BoundedFormula.castLE (km.trans mn) :=
funext (castLE_castLE km mn)
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.cast_le_comp_cast_le FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.castLE_comp_castLE
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Restricts a bounded formula to only use a particular set of free variables. -/
def restrictFreeVar [DecidableEq α] :
∀ {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) (_f : φ.freeVarFinset → β), L.BoundedFormula β n
| _n, falsum, _f => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂, f =>
equal (t₁.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left))
(t₂.restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, rel R ts, f =>
rel R fun i => (ts i).restrictVarLeft (f ∘ Set.inclusion
(subset_biUnion_of_mem (fun i => Term.varFinsetLeft (ts i)) (mem_univ i)))
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂, f =>
(φ₁.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_left)).imp
(φ₂.restrictFreeVar (f ∘ Set.inclusion subset_union_right))
| _n, all φ, f => (φ.restrictFreeVar f).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.restrict_free_var FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.restrictFreeVar
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Places universal quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def alls : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.all.alls
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.alls FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.alls
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Places existential quantifiers on all extra variables of a bounded formula. -/
def exs : ∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L.Formula α
| 0, φ => φ
| _n + 1, φ => φ.ex.exs
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.exs FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.exs
-- Porting note: universes in different order
/-- Maps bounded formulas along a map of terms and a map of relations. -/
def mapTermRel {g : ℕ → ℕ} (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin (g n))))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(h : ∀ n, L'.BoundedFormula β (g (n + 1)) → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n + 1)) :
∀ {n}, L.BoundedFormula α n → L'.BoundedFormula β (g n)
| _n, falsum => falsum
| _n, equal t₁ t₂ => equal (ft _ t₁) (ft _ t₂)
| _n, rel R ts => rel (fr _ R) fun i => ft _ (ts i)
| _n, imp φ₁ φ₂ => (φ₁.mapTermRel ft fr h).imp (φ₂.mapTermRel ft fr h)
| n, all φ => (h n (φ.mapTermRel ft fr h)).all
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel
/-- Raises all of the `Fin`-indexed variables of a formula greater than or equal to `m` by `n'`. -/
def liftAt : ∀ {n : ℕ} (n' _m : ℕ), L.BoundedFormula α n → L.BoundedFormula α (n + n') :=
fun {n} n' m φ =>
φ.mapTermRel (fun k t => t.liftAt n' m) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (by rw [add_assoc, add_comm 1, add_assoc])
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.lift_at FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.liftAt
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_mapTermRel {L'' : Language}
(ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) → L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n → L'.Relations n)
(ft' : ∀ n, L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)) → L''.Term (Sum γ (Fin n)))
(fr' : ∀ n, L'.Relations n → L''.Relations n) {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
((φ.mapTermRel ft fr fun _ => id).mapTermRel ft' fr' fun _ => id) =
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => ft' _ ∘ ft _) (fun _ => fr' _ ∘ fr _) fun _ => id := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_map_term_rel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel_mapTermRel
@[simp]
theorem mapTermRel_id_id_id {n} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α n) :
(φ.mapTermRel (fun _ => id) (fun _ => id) fun _ => id) = φ := by
induction' φ with _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ih1 ih2 _ _ ih3
· rfl
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih1, ih2]
· simp [mapTermRel, ih3]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_id_id_id FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRel_id_id_id
/-- An equivalence of bounded formulas given by an equivalence of terms and an equivalence of
relations. -/
@[simps]
def mapTermRelEquiv (ft : ∀ n, L.Term (Sum α (Fin n)) ≃ L'.Term (Sum β (Fin n)))
(fr : ∀ n, L.Relations n ≃ L'.Relations n) {n} : L.BoundedFormula α n ≃ L'.BoundedFormula β n :=
⟨mapTermRel (fun n => ft n) (fun n => fr n) fun _ => id,
mapTermRel (fun n => (ft n).symm) (fun n => (fr n).symm) fun _ => id, fun φ => by simp, fun φ =>
by simp⟩
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.map_term_rel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv
/-- A function to help relabel the variables in bounded formulas. -/
def relabelAux (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) (k : ℕ) : Sum α (Fin k) → Sum β (Fin (n + k)) :=
Sum.map id finSumFinEquiv ∘ Equiv.sumAssoc _ _ _ ∘ Sum.map g id
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_aux FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabelAux
@[simp]
theorem sum_elim_comp_relabelAux {m : ℕ} {g : α → Sum β (Fin n)} {v : β → M}
{xs : Fin (n + m) → M} : Sum.elim v xs ∘ relabelAux g m =
Sum.elim (Sum.elim v (xs ∘ castAdd m) ∘ g) (xs ∘ natAdd n) := by
ext x
cases' x with x x
· simp only [BoundedFormula.relabelAux, Function.comp_apply, Sum.map_inl, Sum.elim_inl]
cases' g x with l r <;> simp
· simp [BoundedFormula.relabelAux]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.sum_elim_comp_relabel_aux FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.sum_elim_comp_relabelAux
@[simp]
theorem relabelAux_sum_inl (k : ℕ) :
relabelAux (Sum.inl : α → Sum α (Fin n)) k = Sum.map id (natAdd n) := by
ext x
cases x <;> · simp [relabelAux]
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_aux_sum_inl FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabelAux_sum_inl
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's variables along a particular function. -/
def relabel (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) : L.BoundedFormula β (n + k) :=
φ.mapTermRel (fun _ t => t.relabel (relabelAux g _)) (fun _ => id) fun _ =>
castLE (ge_of_eq (add_assoc _ _ _))
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel
/-- Relabels a bounded formula's free variables along a bijection. -/
def relabelEquiv (g : α ≃ β) {k} : L.BoundedFormula α k ≃ L.BoundedFormula β k :=
mapTermRelEquiv (fun _n => Term.relabelEquiv (g.sumCongr (_root_.Equiv.refl _)))
fun _n => _root_.Equiv.refl _
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_equiv FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabelEquiv
@[simp]
theorem relabel_falsum (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) {k} :
(falsum : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = falsum :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_falsum FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel_falsum
@[simp]
theorem relabel_bot (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) {k} : (⊥ : L.BoundedFormula α k).relabel g = ⊥ :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_bot FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel_bot
@[simp]
theorem relabel_imp (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) {k} (φ ψ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
(φ.imp ψ).relabel g = (φ.relabel g).imp (ψ.relabel g) :=
rfl
#align first_order.language.bounded_formula.relabel_imp FirstOrder.Language.BoundedFormula.relabel_imp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Syntax.lean | 613 | 614 | theorem relabel_not (g : α → Sum β (Fin n)) {k} (φ : L.BoundedFormula α k) :
φ.not.relabel g = (φ.relabel g).not := by | simp [BoundedFormula.not]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Completion
#align_import analysis.normed.group.hom_completion from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"17ef379e997badd73e5eabb4d38f11919ab3c4b3"
/-!
# Completion of normed group homs
Given two (semi) normed groups `G` and `H` and a normed group hom `f : NormedAddGroupHom G H`,
we build and study a normed group hom
`f.completion : NormedAddGroupHom (completion G) (completion H)` such that the diagram
```
f
G -----------> H
| |
| |
| |
V V
completion G -----------> completion H
f.completion
```
commutes. The map itself comes from the general theory of completion of uniform spaces, but here
we want a normed group hom, study its operator norm and kernel.
The vertical maps in the above diagrams are also normed group homs constructed in this file.
## Main definitions and results:
* `NormedAddGroupHom.completion`: see the discussion above.
* `NormedAddCommGroup.toCompl : NormedAddGroupHom G (completion G)`: the canonical map from
`G` to its completion, as a normed group hom
* `NormedAddGroupHom.completion_toCompl`: the above diagram indeed commutes.
* `NormedAddGroupHom.norm_completion`: `‖f.completion‖ = ‖f‖`
* `NormedAddGroupHom.ker_le_ker_completion`: the kernel of `f.completion` contains the image of
the kernel of `f`.
* `NormedAddGroupHom.ker_completion`: the kernel of `f.completion` is the closure of the image of
the kernel of `f` under an assumption that `f` is quantitatively surjective onto its image.
* `NormedAddGroupHom.extension` : if `H` is complete, the extension of
`f : NormedAddGroupHom G H` to a `NormedAddGroupHom (completion G) H`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set NormedAddGroupHom UniformSpace
section Completion
variable {G : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup G] {H : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup H]
{K : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup K]
/-- The normed group hom induced between completions. -/
def NormedAddGroupHom.completion (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
NormedAddGroupHom (Completion G) (Completion H) :=
.ofLipschitz (f.toAddMonoidHom.completion f.continuous) f.lipschitz.completion_map
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion NormedAddGroupHom.completion
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (x : Completion G) :
f.completion x = Completion.map f x :=
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_def NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) :
(f.completion : Completion G → Completion H) = Completion.map f := rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_coe_to_fun NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun
-- Porting note: `@[simp]` moved to the next lemma
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : G) :
f.completion g = f g :=
Completion.map_coe f.uniformContinuous _
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_coe NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe' (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : G) :
Completion.map f g = f g :=
f.completion_coe g
/-- Completion of normed group homs as a normed group hom. -/
@[simps]
def normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom :
NormedAddGroupHom G H →+ NormedAddGroupHom (Completion G) (Completion H) where
toFun := NormedAddGroupHom.completion
map_zero' := toAddMonoidHom_injective AddMonoidHom.completion_zero
map_add' f g := toAddMonoidHom_injective <|
f.toAddMonoidHom.completion_add g.toAddMonoidHom f.continuous g.continuous
#align normed_add_group_hom_completion_hom normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom
#align normed_add_group_hom_completion_hom_apply normedAddGroupHomCompletionHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_id :
(NormedAddGroupHom.id G).completion = NormedAddGroupHom.id (Completion G) := by
ext x
rw [NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def, NormedAddGroupHom.coe_id, Completion.map_id]
rfl
#align normed_add_group_hom.completion_id NormedAddGroupHom.completion_id
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/HomCompletion.lean | 107 | 113 | theorem NormedAddGroupHom.completion_comp (f : NormedAddGroupHom G H) (g : NormedAddGroupHom H K) :
g.completion.comp f.completion = (g.comp f).completion := by |
ext x
rw [NormedAddGroupHom.coe_comp, NormedAddGroupHom.completion_def,
NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun, NormedAddGroupHom.completion_coe_to_fun,
Completion.map_comp g.uniformContinuous f.uniformContinuous]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Arthur Paulino. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Arthur Paulino, Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Coloring
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.partition from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2303b3e299f1c75b07bceaaac130ce23044d1386"
/-!
# Graph partitions
This module provides an interface for dealing with partitions on simple graphs. A partition of
a graph `G`, with vertices `V`, is a set `P` of disjoint nonempty subsets of `V` such that:
* The union of the subsets in `P` is `V`.
* Each element of `P` is an independent set. (Each subset contains no pair of adjacent vertices.)
Graph partitions are graph colorings that do not name their colors. They are adjoint in the
following sense. Given a graph coloring, there is an associated partition from the set of color
classes, and given a partition, there is an associated graph coloring from using the partition's
subsets as colors. Going from graph colorings to partitions and back makes a coloring "canonical":
all colors are given a canonical name and unused colors are removed. Going from partitions to
graph colorings and back is the identity.
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Partition` is a structure to represent a partition of a simple graph
* `SimpleGraph.Partition.PartsCardLe` is whether a given partition is an `n`-partition.
(a partition with at most `n` parts).
* `SimpleGraph.Partitionable n` is whether a given graph is `n`-partite
* `SimpleGraph.Partition.toColoring` creates colorings from partitions
* `SimpleGraph.Coloring.toPartition` creates partitions from colorings
## Main statements
* `SimpleGraph.partitionable_iff_colorable` is that `n`-partitionability and
`n`-colorability are equivalent.
-/
universe u v
namespace SimpleGraph
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V)
/-- A `Partition` of a simple graph `G` is a structure constituted by
* `parts`: a set of subsets of the vertices `V` of `G`
* `isPartition`: a proof that `parts` is a proper partition of `V`
* `independent`: a proof that each element of `parts` doesn't have a pair of adjacent vertices
-/
structure Partition where
/-- `parts`: a set of subsets of the vertices `V` of `G`. -/
parts : Set (Set V)
/-- `isPartition`: a proof that `parts` is a proper partition of `V`. -/
isPartition : Setoid.IsPartition parts
/-- `independent`: a proof that each element of `parts` doesn't have a pair of adjacent vertices.
-/
independent : ∀ s ∈ parts, IsAntichain G.Adj s
#align simple_graph.partition SimpleGraph.Partition
/-- Whether a partition `P` has at most `n` parts. A graph with a partition
satisfying this predicate called `n`-partite. (See `SimpleGraph.Partitionable`.) -/
def Partition.PartsCardLe {G : SimpleGraph V} (P : G.Partition) (n : ℕ) : Prop :=
∃ h : P.parts.Finite, h.toFinset.card ≤ n
#align simple_graph.partition.parts_card_le SimpleGraph.Partition.PartsCardLe
/-- Whether a graph is `n`-partite, which is whether its vertex set
can be partitioned in at most `n` independent sets. -/
def Partitionable (n : ℕ) : Prop := ∃ P : G.Partition, P.PartsCardLe n
#align simple_graph.partitionable SimpleGraph.Partitionable
namespace Partition
variable {G} (P : G.Partition)
/-- The part in the partition that `v` belongs to -/
def partOfVertex (v : V) : Set V := Classical.choose (P.isPartition.2 v)
#align simple_graph.partition.part_of_vertex SimpleGraph.Partition.partOfVertex
theorem partOfVertex_mem (v : V) : P.partOfVertex v ∈ P.parts := by
obtain ⟨h, -⟩ := (P.isPartition.2 v).choose_spec.1
exact h
#align simple_graph.partition.part_of_vertex_mem SimpleGraph.Partition.partOfVertex_mem
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Partition.lean | 93 | 95 | theorem mem_partOfVertex (v : V) : v ∈ P.partOfVertex v := by |
obtain ⟨⟨_, h⟩, _⟩ := (P.isPartition.2 v).choose_spec
exact h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite
#align_import data.finsupp.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"842328d9df7e96fd90fc424e115679c15fb23a71"
/-!
# Type of functions with finite support
For any type `α` and any type `M` with zero, we define the type `Finsupp α M` (notation: `α →₀ M`)
of finitely supported functions from `α` to `M`, i.e. the functions which are zero everywhere
on `α` except on a finite set.
Functions with finite support are used (at least) in the following parts of the library:
* `MonoidAlgebra R M` and `AddMonoidAlgebra R M` are defined as `M →₀ R`;
* polynomials and multivariate polynomials are defined as `AddMonoidAlgebra`s, hence they use
`Finsupp` under the hood;
* the linear combination of a family of vectors `v i` with coefficients `f i` (as used, e.g., to
define linearly independent family `LinearIndependent`) is defined as a map
`Finsupp.total : (ι → M) → (ι →₀ R) →ₗ[R] M`.
Some other constructions are naturally equivalent to `α →₀ M` with some `α` and `M` but are defined
in a different way in the library:
* `Multiset α ≃+ α →₀ ℕ`;
* `FreeAbelianGroup α ≃+ α →₀ ℤ`.
Most of the theory assumes that the range is a commutative additive monoid. This gives us the big
sum operator as a powerful way to construct `Finsupp` elements, which is defined in
`Algebra/BigOperators/Finsupp`.
-- Porting note: the semireducibility remark no longer applies in Lean 4, afaict.
Many constructions based on `α →₀ M` use `semireducible` type tags to avoid reusing unwanted type
instances. E.g., `MonoidAlgebra`, `AddMonoidAlgebra`, and types based on these two have
non-pointwise multiplication.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp`: The type of finitely supported functions from `α` to `β`.
* `Finsupp.single`: The `Finsupp` which is nonzero in exactly one point.
* `Finsupp.update`: Changes one value of a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.erase`: Replaces one value of a `Finsupp` by `0`.
* `Finsupp.onFinset`: The restriction of a function to a `Finset` as a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.mapRange`: Composition of a `ZeroHom` with a `Finsupp`.
* `Finsupp.embDomain`: Maps the domain of a `Finsupp` by an embedding.
* `Finsupp.zipWith`: Postcomposition of two `Finsupp`s with a function `f` such that `f 0 0 = 0`.
## Notations
This file adds `α →₀ M` as a global notation for `Finsupp α M`.
We also use the following convention for `Type*` variables in this file
* `α`, `β`, `γ`: types with no additional structure that appear as the first argument to `Finsupp`
somewhere in the statement;
* `ι` : an auxiliary index type;
* `M`, `M'`, `N`, `P`: types with `Zero` or `(Add)(Comm)Monoid` structure; `M` is also used
for a (semi)module over a (semi)ring.
* `G`, `H`: groups (commutative or not, multiplicative or additive);
* `R`, `S`: (semi)rings.
## Implementation notes
This file is a `noncomputable theory` and uses classical logic throughout.
## TODO
* Expand the list of definitions and important lemmas to the module docstring.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {α β γ ι M M' N P G H R S : Type*}
/-- `Finsupp α M`, denoted `α →₀ M`, is the type of functions `f : α → M` such that
`f x = 0` for all but finitely many `x`. -/
structure Finsupp (α : Type*) (M : Type*) [Zero M] where
/-- The support of a finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
support : Finset α
/-- The underlying function of a bundled finitely supported function (aka `Finsupp`). -/
toFun : α → M
/-- The witness that the support of a `Finsupp` is indeed the exact locus where its
underlying function is nonzero. -/
mem_support_toFun : ∀ a, a ∈ support ↔ toFun a ≠ 0
#align finsupp Finsupp
#align finsupp.support Finsupp.support
#align finsupp.to_fun Finsupp.toFun
#align finsupp.mem_support_to_fun Finsupp.mem_support_toFun
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:25 " →₀ " => Finsupp
namespace Finsupp
/-! ### Basic declarations about `Finsupp` -/
section Basic
variable [Zero M]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (α →₀ M) α M :=
⟨toFun, by
rintro ⟨s, f, hf⟩ ⟨t, g, hg⟩ (rfl : f = g)
congr
ext a
exact (hf _).trans (hg _).symm⟩
#align finsupp.fun_like Finsupp.instFunLike
/-- Helper instance for when there are too many metavariables to apply the `DFunLike` instance
directly. -/
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun (α →₀ M) fun _ => α → M :=
inferInstance
#align finsupp.has_coe_to_fun Finsupp.instCoeFun
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →₀ M} (h : ∀ a, f a = g a) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ h
#align finsupp.ext Finsupp.ext
#align finsupp.ext_iff DFunLike.ext_iff
lemma ne_iff {f g : α →₀ M} : f ≠ g ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ g a := DFunLike.ne_iff
#align finsupp.coe_fn_inj DFunLike.coe_fn_eq
#align finsupp.coe_fn_injective DFunLike.coe_injective
#align finsupp.congr_fun DFunLike.congr_fun
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) (h : ∀ a, a ∈ s ↔ f a ≠ 0) : ⇑(⟨s, f, h⟩ : α →₀ M) = f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.coe_mk Finsupp.coe_mk
instance instZero : Zero (α →₀ M) :=
⟨⟨∅, 0, fun _ => ⟨fun h ↦ (not_mem_empty _ h).elim, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩⟩⟩
#align finsupp.has_zero Finsupp.instZero
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zero : ⇑(0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := rfl
#align finsupp.coe_zero Finsupp.coe_zero
theorem zero_apply {a : α} : (0 : α →₀ M) a = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.zero_apply Finsupp.zero_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : α →₀ M).support = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finsupp.support_zero Finsupp.support_zero
instance instInhabited : Inhabited (α →₀ M) :=
⟨0⟩
#align finsupp.inhabited Finsupp.instInhabited
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} : ∀ {a : α}, a ∈ f.support ↔ f a ≠ 0 :=
@(f.mem_support_toFun)
#align finsupp.mem_support_iff Finsupp.mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem fun_support_eq (f : α →₀ M) : Function.support f = f.support :=
Set.ext fun _x => mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.fun_support_eq Finsupp.fun_support_eq
theorem not_mem_support_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a} : a ∉ f.support ↔ f a = 0 :=
not_iff_comm.1 mem_support_iff.symm
#align finsupp.not_mem_support_iff Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : (f : α → M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, DFunLike.coe_fn_eq]
#align finsupp.coe_eq_zero Finsupp.coe_eq_zero
theorem ext_iff' {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.support, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ =>
ext fun a => by
classical
exact if h : a ∈ f.support then h₂ a h else by
have hf : f a = 0 := not_mem_support_iff.1 h
have hg : g a = 0 := by rwa [h₁, not_mem_support_iff] at h
rw [hf, hg]⟩
#align finsupp.ext_iff' Finsupp.ext_iff'
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {f : α →₀ M} : f.support = ∅ ↔ f = 0 :=
mod_cast @Function.support_eq_empty_iff _ _ _ f
#align finsupp.support_eq_empty Finsupp.support_eq_empty
theorem support_nonempty_iff {f : α →₀ M} : f.support.Nonempty ↔ f ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Finsupp.support_eq_empty, Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne]
#align finsupp.support_nonempty_iff Finsupp.support_nonempty_iff
#align finsupp.nonzero_iff_exists Finsupp.ne_iff
theorem card_support_eq_zero {f : α →₀ M} : card f.support = 0 ↔ f = 0 := by simp
#align finsupp.card_support_eq_zero Finsupp.card_support_eq_zero
instance instDecidableEq [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] : DecidableEq (α →₀ M) := fun f g =>
decidable_of_iff (f.support = g.support ∧ ∀ a ∈ f.support, f a = g a) ext_iff'.symm
#align finsupp.decidable_eq Finsupp.instDecidableEq
theorem finite_support (f : α →₀ M) : Set.Finite (Function.support f) :=
f.fun_support_eq.symm ▸ f.support.finite_toSet
#align finsupp.finite_support Finsupp.finite_support
theorem support_subset_iff {s : Set α} {f : α →₀ M} :
↑f.support ⊆ s ↔ ∀ a ∉ s, f a = 0 := by
simp only [Set.subset_def, mem_coe, mem_support_iff]; exact forall_congr' fun a => not_imp_comm
#align finsupp.support_subset_iff Finsupp.support_subset_iff
/-- Given `Finite α`, `equivFunOnFinite` is the `Equiv` between `α →₀ β` and `α → β`.
(All functions on a finite type are finitely supported.) -/
@[simps]
def equivFunOnFinite [Finite α] : (α →₀ M) ≃ (α → M) where
toFun := (⇑)
invFun f := mk (Function.support f).toFinite.toFinset f fun _a => Set.Finite.mem_toFinset _
left_inv _f := ext fun _x => rfl
right_inv _f := rfl
#align finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe {α} [Finite α] (f : α →₀ M) : equivFunOnFinite.symm f = f :=
equivFunOnFinite.symm_apply_apply f
#align finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite_symm_coe Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite_symm_coe
/--
If `α` has a unique term, the type of finitely supported functions `α →₀ β` is equivalent to `β`.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.Equiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] : (ι →₀ M) ≃ M :=
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.trans (Equiv.funUnique ι M)
#align equiv.finsupp_unique Equiv.finsuppUnique
#align equiv.finsupp_unique_symm_apply_support_val Equiv.finsuppUnique_symm_apply_support_val
#align equiv.finsupp_unique_symm_apply_to_fun Equiv.finsuppUnique_symm_apply_toFun
#align equiv.finsupp_unique_apply Equiv.finsuppUnique_apply
@[ext]
theorem unique_ext [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} (h : f default = g default) : f = g :=
ext fun a => by rwa [Unique.eq_default a]
#align finsupp.unique_ext Finsupp.unique_ext
theorem unique_ext_iff [Unique α] {f g : α →₀ M} : f = g ↔ f default = g default :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, unique_ext⟩
#align finsupp.unique_ext_iff Finsupp.unique_ext_iff
end Basic
/-! ### Declarations about `single` -/
section Single
variable [Zero M] {a a' : α} {b : M}
/-- `single a b` is the finitely supported function with value `b` at `a` and zero otherwise. -/
def single (a : α) (b : M) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
if b = 0 then ∅ else {a}
toFun :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
Pi.single a b
mem_support_toFun a' := by
classical
obtain rfl | hb := eq_or_ne b 0
· simp [Pi.single, update]
rw [if_neg hb, mem_singleton]
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a' a
· simp [hb, Pi.single, update]
simp [Pi.single_eq_of_ne' ha.symm, ha]
#align finsupp.single Finsupp.single
theorem single_apply [Decidable (a = a')] : single a b a' = if a = a' then b else 0 := by
classical
simp_rw [@eq_comm _ a a']
convert Pi.single_apply a b a'
#align finsupp.single_apply Finsupp.single_apply
theorem single_apply_left {f : α → β} (hf : Function.Injective f) (x z : α) (y : M) :
single (f x) y (f z) = single x y z := by classical simp only [single_apply, hf.eq_iff]
#align finsupp.single_apply_left Finsupp.single_apply_left
theorem single_eq_set_indicator : ⇑(single a b) = Set.indicator {a} fun _ => b := by
classical
ext
simp [single_apply, Set.indicator, @eq_comm _ a]
#align finsupp.single_eq_set_indicator Finsupp.single_eq_set_indicator
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_same : (single a b : α →₀ M) a = b := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_same (f := fun _ ↦ M) a b
#align finsupp.single_eq_same Finsupp.single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_of_ne (h : a ≠ a') : (single a b : α →₀ M) a' = 0 := by
classical exact Pi.single_eq_of_ne' h _
#align finsupp.single_eq_of_ne Finsupp.single_eq_of_ne
theorem single_eq_update [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (b : M) :
⇑(single a b) = Function.update (0 : _) a b := by
classical rw [single_eq_set_indicator, ← Set.piecewise_eq_indicator, Set.piecewise_singleton]
#align finsupp.single_eq_update Finsupp.single_eq_update
theorem single_eq_pi_single [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (b : M) : ⇑(single a b) = Pi.single a b :=
single_eq_update a b
#align finsupp.single_eq_pi_single Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single
@[simp]
theorem single_zero (a : α) : (single a 0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
DFunLike.coe_injective <| by
classical simpa only [single_eq_update, coe_zero] using Function.update_eq_self a (0 : α → M)
#align finsupp.single_zero Finsupp.single_zero
theorem single_of_single_apply (a a' : α) (b : M) :
single a ((single a' b) a) = single a' (single a' b) a := by
classical
rw [single_apply, single_apply]
ext
split_ifs with h
· rw [h]
· rw [zero_apply, single_apply, ite_self]
#align finsupp.single_of_single_apply Finsupp.single_of_single_apply
theorem support_single_ne_zero (a : α) (hb : b ≠ 0) : (single a b).support = {a} :=
if_neg hb
#align finsupp.support_single_ne_zero Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero
theorem support_single_subset : (single a b).support ⊆ {a} := by
classical show ite _ _ _ ⊆ _; split_ifs <;> [exact empty_subset _; exact Subset.refl _]
#align finsupp.support_single_subset Finsupp.support_single_subset
theorem single_apply_mem (x) : single a b x ∈ ({0, b} : Set M) := by
rcases em (a = x) with (rfl | hx) <;> [simp; simp [single_eq_of_ne hx]]
#align finsupp.single_apply_mem Finsupp.single_apply_mem
theorem range_single_subset : Set.range (single a b) ⊆ {0, b} :=
Set.range_subset_iff.2 single_apply_mem
#align finsupp.range_single_subset Finsupp.range_single_subset
/-- `Finsupp.single a b` is injective in `b`. For the statement that it is injective in `a`, see
`Finsupp.single_left_injective` -/
theorem single_injective (a : α) : Function.Injective (single a : M → α →₀ M) := fun b₁ b₂ eq => by
have : (single a b₁ : α →₀ M) a = (single a b₂ : α →₀ M) a := by rw [eq]
rwa [single_eq_same, single_eq_same] at this
#align finsupp.single_injective Finsupp.single_injective
theorem single_apply_eq_zero {a x : α} {b : M} : single a b x = 0 ↔ x = a → b = 0 := by
simp [single_eq_set_indicator]
#align finsupp.single_apply_eq_zero Finsupp.single_apply_eq_zero
theorem single_apply_ne_zero {a x : α} {b : M} : single a b x ≠ 0 ↔ x = a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
simp [single_apply_eq_zero]
#align finsupp.single_apply_ne_zero Finsupp.single_apply_ne_zero
theorem mem_support_single (a a' : α) (b : M) : a ∈ (single a' b).support ↔ a = a' ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
simp [single_apply_eq_zero, not_or]
#align finsupp.mem_support_single Finsupp.mem_support_single
theorem eq_single_iff {f : α →₀ M} {a b} : f = single a b ↔ f.support ⊆ {a} ∧ f a = b := by
refine ⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨support_single_subset, single_eq_same⟩, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨h, rfl⟩
ext x
by_cases hx : a = x <;> simp only [hx, single_eq_same, single_eq_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
exact not_mem_support_iff.1 (mt (fun hx => (mem_singleton.1 (h hx)).symm) hx)
#align finsupp.eq_single_iff Finsupp.eq_single_iff
theorem single_eq_single_iff (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : M) :
single a₁ b₁ = single a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 := by
constructor
· intro eq
by_cases h : a₁ = a₂
· refine Or.inl ⟨h, ?_⟩
rwa [h, (single_injective a₂).eq_iff] at eq
· rw [DFunLike.ext_iff] at eq
have h₁ := eq a₁
have h₂ := eq a₂
simp only [single_eq_same, single_eq_of_ne h, single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm h)] at h₁ h₂
exact Or.inr ⟨h₁, h₂.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨rfl, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· rfl
· rw [single_zero, single_zero]
#align finsupp.single_eq_single_iff Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff
/-- `Finsupp.single a b` is injective in `a`. For the statement that it is injective in `b`, see
`Finsupp.single_injective` -/
theorem single_left_injective (h : b ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun a : α => single a b :=
fun _a _a' H => (((single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _).mp H).resolve_right fun hb => h hb.1).left
#align finsupp.single_left_injective Finsupp.single_left_injective
theorem single_left_inj (h : b ≠ 0) : single a b = single a' b ↔ a = a' :=
(single_left_injective h).eq_iff
#align finsupp.single_left_inj Finsupp.single_left_inj
theorem support_single_ne_bot (i : α) (h : b ≠ 0) : (single i b).support ≠ ⊥ := by
simpa only [support_single_ne_zero _ h] using singleton_ne_empty _
#align finsupp.support_single_ne_bot Finsupp.support_single_ne_bot
theorem support_single_disjoint {b' : M} (hb : b ≠ 0) (hb' : b' ≠ 0) {i j : α} :
Disjoint (single i b).support (single j b').support ↔ i ≠ j := by
rw [support_single_ne_zero _ hb, support_single_ne_zero _ hb', disjoint_singleton]
#align finsupp.support_single_disjoint Finsupp.support_single_disjoint
@[simp]
theorem single_eq_zero : single a b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
simp [DFunLike.ext_iff, single_eq_set_indicator]
#align finsupp.single_eq_zero Finsupp.single_eq_zero
theorem single_swap (a₁ a₂ : α) (b : M) : single a₁ b a₂ = single a₂ b a₁ := by
classical simp only [single_apply, eq_comm]
#align finsupp.single_swap Finsupp.single_swap
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] [Nontrivial M] : Nontrivial (α →₀ M) := by
inhabit α
rcases exists_ne (0 : M) with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact nontrivial_of_ne (single default x) 0 (mt single_eq_zero.1 hx)
#align finsupp.nontrivial Finsupp.instNontrivial
theorem unique_single [Unique α] (x : α →₀ M) : x = single default (x default) :=
ext <| Unique.forall_iff.2 single_eq_same.symm
#align finsupp.unique_single Finsupp.unique_single
@[simp]
theorem unique_single_eq_iff [Unique α] {b' : M} : single a b = single a' b' ↔ b = b' := by
rw [unique_ext_iff, Unique.eq_default a, Unique.eq_default a', single_eq_same, single_eq_same]
#align finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff
lemma apply_single [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F N P] [AddMonoidHomClass F N P] (e : F)
(a : α) (n : N) (b : α) :
e ((single a n) b) = single a (e n) b := by
classical
simp only [single_apply]
split_ifs
· rfl
· exact map_zero e
theorem support_eq_singleton {f : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
f.support = {a} ↔ f a ≠ 0 ∧ f = single a (f a) :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨mem_support_iff.1 <| h.symm ▸ Finset.mem_singleton_self a,
eq_single_iff.2 ⟨subset_of_eq h, rfl⟩⟩,
fun h => h.2.symm ▸ support_single_ne_zero _ h.1⟩
#align finsupp.support_eq_singleton Finsupp.support_eq_singleton
theorem support_eq_singleton' {f : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
f.support = {a} ↔ ∃ b ≠ 0, f = single a b :=
⟨fun h =>
let h := support_eq_singleton.1 h
⟨_, h.1, h.2⟩,
fun ⟨_b, hb, hf⟩ => hf.symm ▸ support_single_ne_zero _ hb⟩
#align finsupp.support_eq_singleton' Finsupp.support_eq_singleton'
theorem card_support_eq_one {f : α →₀ M} :
card f.support = 1 ↔ ∃ a, f a ≠ 0 ∧ f = single a (f a) := by
simp only [card_eq_one, support_eq_singleton]
#align finsupp.card_support_eq_one Finsupp.card_support_eq_one
theorem card_support_eq_one' {f : α →₀ M} :
card f.support = 1 ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b ≠ 0, f = single a b := by
simp only [card_eq_one, support_eq_singleton']
#align finsupp.card_support_eq_one' Finsupp.card_support_eq_one'
theorem support_subset_singleton {f : α →₀ M} {a : α} : f.support ⊆ {a} ↔ f = single a (f a) :=
⟨fun h => eq_single_iff.mpr ⟨h, rfl⟩, fun h => (eq_single_iff.mp h).left⟩
#align finsupp.support_subset_singleton Finsupp.support_subset_singleton
theorem support_subset_singleton' {f : α →₀ M} {a : α} : f.support ⊆ {a} ↔ ∃ b, f = single a b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨f a, support_subset_singleton.mp h⟩, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ => by
rw [hb, support_subset_singleton, single_eq_same]⟩
#align finsupp.support_subset_singleton' Finsupp.support_subset_singleton'
theorem card_support_le_one [Nonempty α] {f : α →₀ M} :
card f.support ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ a, f = single a (f a) := by
simp only [card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton, support_subset_singleton]
#align finsupp.card_support_le_one Finsupp.card_support_le_one
theorem card_support_le_one' [Nonempty α] {f : α →₀ M} :
card f.support ≤ 1 ↔ ∃ a b, f = single a b := by
simp only [card_le_one_iff_subset_singleton, support_subset_singleton']
#align finsupp.card_support_le_one' Finsupp.card_support_le_one'
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_single [DecidableEq α] [Finite α] (x : α) (m : M) :
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite (Finsupp.single x m) = Pi.single x m := by
ext
simp [Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, equivFunOnFinite]
#align finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite_single Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite_single
@[simp]
theorem equivFunOnFinite_symm_single [DecidableEq α] [Finite α] (x : α) (m : M) :
Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite.symm (Pi.single x m) = Finsupp.single x m := by
rw [← equivFunOnFinite_single, Equiv.symm_apply_apply]
#align finsupp.equiv_fun_on_finite_symm_single Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite_symm_single
end Single
/-! ### Declarations about `update` -/
section Update
variable [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) (i : α)
/-- Replace the value of a `α →₀ M` at a given point `a : α` by a given value `b : M`.
If `b = 0`, this amounts to removing `a` from the `Finsupp.support`.
Otherwise, if `a` was not in the `Finsupp.support`, it is added to it.
This is the finitely-supported version of `Function.update`. -/
def update (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) : α →₀ M where
support := by
haveI := Classical.decEq α; haveI := Classical.decEq M
exact if b = 0 then f.support.erase a else insert a f.support
toFun :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
Function.update f a b
mem_support_toFun i := by
classical
rw [Function.update]
simp only [eq_rec_constant, dite_eq_ite, ne_eq]
split_ifs with hb ha ha <;>
try simp only [*, not_false_iff, iff_true, not_true, iff_false]
· rw [Finset.mem_erase]
simp
· rw [Finset.mem_erase]
simp [ha]
· rw [Finset.mem_insert]
simp [ha]
· rw [Finset.mem_insert]
simp [ha]
#align finsupp.update Finsupp.update
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_update [DecidableEq α] : (f.update a b : α → M) = Function.update f a b := by
delta update Function.update
ext
dsimp
split_ifs <;> simp
#align finsupp.coe_update Finsupp.coe_update
@[simp]
theorem update_self : f.update a (f a) = f := by
classical
ext
simp
#align finsupp.update_self Finsupp.update_self
@[simp]
theorem zero_update : update 0 a b = single a b := by
classical
ext
rw [single_eq_update]
rfl
#align finsupp.zero_update Finsupp.zero_update
theorem support_update [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] :
support (f.update a b) = if b = 0 then f.support.erase a else insert a f.support := by
classical
dsimp [update]; congr <;> apply Subsingleton.elim
#align finsupp.support_update Finsupp.support_update
@[simp]
theorem support_update_zero [DecidableEq α] : support (f.update a 0) = f.support.erase a := by
classical
simp only [update, ite_true, mem_support_iff, ne_eq, not_not]
congr; apply Subsingleton.elim
#align finsupp.support_update_zero Finsupp.support_update_zero
variable {b}
theorem support_update_ne_zero [DecidableEq α] (h : b ≠ 0) :
support (f.update a b) = insert a f.support := by
classical
simp only [update, h, ite_false, mem_support_iff, ne_eq]
congr; apply Subsingleton.elim
#align finsupp.support_update_ne_zero Finsupp.support_update_ne_zero
theorem support_update_subset [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] :
support (f.update a b) ⊆ insert a f.support := by
rw [support_update]
split_ifs
· exact (erase_subset _ _).trans (subset_insert _ _)
· rfl
theorem update_comm (f : α →₀ M) {a₁ a₂ : α} (h : a₁ ≠ a₂) (m₁ m₂ : M) :
update (update f a₁ m₁) a₂ m₂ = update (update f a₂ m₂) a₁ m₁ :=
letI := Classical.decEq α
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.update_comm h _ _ _
@[simp] theorem update_idem (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b c : M) :
update (update f a b) a c = update f a c :=
letI := Classical.decEq α
DFunLike.coe_injective <| Function.update_idem _ _ _
end Update
/-! ### Declarations about `erase` -/
section Erase
variable [Zero M]
/--
`erase a f` is the finitely supported function equal to `f` except at `a` where it is equal to `0`.
If `a` is not in the support of `f` then `erase a f = f`.
-/
def erase (a : α) (f : α →₀ M) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
f.support.erase a
toFun a' :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
if a' = a then 0 else f a'
mem_support_toFun a' := by
classical
rw [mem_erase, mem_support_iff]; dsimp
split_ifs with h
· exact ⟨fun H _ => H.1 h, fun H => (H rfl).elim⟩
· exact and_iff_right h
#align finsupp.erase Finsupp.erase
@[simp]
theorem support_erase [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {f : α →₀ M} :
(f.erase a).support = f.support.erase a := by
classical
dsimp [erase]
congr; apply Subsingleton.elim
#align finsupp.support_erase Finsupp.support_erase
@[simp]
theorem erase_same {a : α} {f : α →₀ M} : (f.erase a) a = 0 := by
classical simp only [erase, coe_mk, ite_true]
#align finsupp.erase_same Finsupp.erase_same
@[simp]
theorem erase_ne {a a' : α} {f : α →₀ M} (h : a' ≠ a) : (f.erase a) a' = f a' := by
classical simp only [erase, coe_mk, h, ite_false]
#align finsupp.erase_ne Finsupp.erase_ne
theorem erase_apply [DecidableEq α] {a a' : α} {f : α →₀ M} :
f.erase a a' = if a' = a then 0 else f a' := by
rw [erase, coe_mk]
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem erase_single {a : α} {b : M} : erase a (single a b) = 0 := by
ext s; by_cases hs : s = a
· rw [hs, erase_same]
rfl
· rw [erase_ne hs]
exact single_eq_of_ne (Ne.symm hs)
#align finsupp.erase_single Finsupp.erase_single
theorem erase_single_ne {a a' : α} {b : M} (h : a ≠ a') : erase a (single a' b) = single a' b := by
ext s; by_cases hs : s = a
· rw [hs, erase_same, single_eq_of_ne h.symm]
· rw [erase_ne hs]
#align finsupp.erase_single_ne Finsupp.erase_single_ne
@[simp]
theorem erase_of_not_mem_support {f : α →₀ M} {a} (haf : a ∉ f.support) : erase a f = f := by
ext b; by_cases hab : b = a
· rwa [hab, erase_same, eq_comm, ← not_mem_support_iff]
· rw [erase_ne hab]
#align finsupp.erase_of_not_mem_support Finsupp.erase_of_not_mem_support
@[simp, nolint simpNF] -- Porting note: simpNF linter claims simp can prove this, it can not
theorem erase_zero (a : α) : erase a (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 := by
classical rw [← support_eq_empty, support_erase, support_zero, erase_empty]
#align finsupp.erase_zero Finsupp.erase_zero
theorem erase_eq_update_zero (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) : f.erase a = update f a 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq α
ext fun _ => (Function.update_apply _ _ _ _).symm
-- The name matches `Finset.erase_insert_of_ne`
theorem erase_update_of_ne (f : α →₀ M) {a a' : α} (ha : a ≠ a') (b : M) :
erase a (update f a' b) = update (erase a f) a' b := by
rw [erase_eq_update_zero, erase_eq_update_zero, update_comm _ ha]
-- not `simp` as `erase_of_not_mem_support` can prove this
theorem erase_idem (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) :
erase a (erase a f) = erase a f := by
rw [erase_eq_update_zero, erase_eq_update_zero, update_idem]
@[simp] theorem update_erase_eq_update (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) :
update (erase a f) a b = update f a b := by
rw [erase_eq_update_zero, update_idem]
@[simp] theorem erase_update_eq_erase (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) :
erase a (update f a b) = erase a f := by
rw [erase_eq_update_zero, erase_eq_update_zero, update_idem]
end Erase
/-! ### Declarations about `onFinset` -/
section OnFinset
variable [Zero M]
/-- `Finsupp.onFinset s f hf` is the finsupp function representing `f` restricted to the finset `s`.
The function must be `0` outside of `s`. Use this when the set needs to be filtered anyways,
otherwise a better set representation is often available. -/
def onFinset (s : Finset α) (f : α → M) (hf : ∀ a, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) : α →₀ M where
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq M
s.filter (f · ≠ 0)
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun := by classical simpa
#align finsupp.on_finset Finsupp.onFinset
@[simp]
theorem onFinset_apply {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf a} : (onFinset s f hf : α →₀ M) a = f a :=
rfl
#align finsupp.on_finset_apply Finsupp.onFinset_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_onFinset_subset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} {hf} :
(onFinset s f hf).support ⊆ s := by
classical convert filter_subset (f · ≠ 0) s
#align finsupp.support_on_finset_subset Finsupp.support_onFinset_subset
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem mem_support_onFinset {s : Finset α} {f : α → M} (hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) {a : α} :
a ∈ (Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support ↔ f a ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Finsupp.onFinset_apply]
#align finsupp.mem_support_on_finset Finsupp.mem_support_onFinset
theorem support_onFinset [DecidableEq M] {s : Finset α} {f : α → M}
(hf : ∀ a : α, f a ≠ 0 → a ∈ s) :
(Finsupp.onFinset s f hf).support = s.filter fun a => f a ≠ 0 := by
dsimp [onFinset]; congr
#align finsupp.support_on_finset Finsupp.support_onFinset
end OnFinset
section OfSupportFinite
variable [Zero M]
/-- The natural `Finsupp` induced by the function `f` given that it has finite support. -/
noncomputable def ofSupportFinite (f : α → M) (hf : (Function.support f).Finite) : α →₀ M where
support := hf.toFinset
toFun := f
mem_support_toFun _ := hf.mem_toFinset
#align finsupp.of_support_finite Finsupp.ofSupportFinite
theorem ofSupportFinite_coe {f : α → M} {hf : (Function.support f).Finite} :
(ofSupportFinite f hf : α → M) = f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.of_support_finite_coe Finsupp.ofSupportFinite_coe
instance instCanLift : CanLift (α → M) (α →₀ M) (⇑) fun f => (Function.support f).Finite where
prf f hf := ⟨ofSupportFinite f hf, rfl⟩
#align finsupp.can_lift Finsupp.instCanLift
end OfSupportFinite
/-! ### Declarations about `mapRange` -/
section MapRange
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- The composition of `f : M → N` and `g : α →₀ M` is `mapRange f hf g : α →₀ N`,
which is well-defined when `f 0 = 0`.
This preserves the structure on `f`, and exists in various bundled forms for when `f` is itself
bundled (defined in `Data/Finsupp/Basic`):
* `Finsupp.mapRange.equiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.zeroHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addMonoidHom`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.addEquiv`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearMap`
* `Finsupp.mapRange.linearEquiv`
-/
def mapRange (f : M → N) (hf : f 0 = 0) (g : α →₀ M) : α →₀ N :=
onFinset g.support (f ∘ g) fun a => by
rw [mem_support_iff, not_imp_not]; exact fun H => (congr_arg f H).trans hf
#align finsupp.map_range Finsupp.mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_apply {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} {a : α} :
mapRange f hf g a = f (g a) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.map_range_apply Finsupp.mapRange_apply
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_zero {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} : mapRange f hf (0 : α →₀ M) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [hf, zero_apply, mapRange_apply]
#align finsupp.map_range_zero Finsupp.mapRange_zero
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_id (g : α →₀ M) : mapRange id rfl g = g :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range_id Finsupp.mapRange_id
theorem mapRange_comp (f : N → P) (hf : f 0 = 0) (f₂ : M → N) (hf₂ : f₂ 0 = 0) (h : (f ∘ f₂) 0 = 0)
(g : α →₀ M) : mapRange (f ∘ f₂) h g = mapRange f hf (mapRange f₂ hf₂ g) :=
ext fun _ => rfl
#align finsupp.map_range_comp Finsupp.mapRange_comp
theorem support_mapRange {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {g : α →₀ M} :
(mapRange f hf g).support ⊆ g.support :=
support_onFinset_subset
#align finsupp.support_map_range Finsupp.support_mapRange
@[simp]
theorem mapRange_single {f : M → N} {hf : f 0 = 0} {a : α} {b : M} :
mapRange f hf (single a b) = single a (f b) :=
ext fun a' => by
classical simpa only [single_eq_pi_single] using Pi.apply_single _ (fun _ => hf) a _ a'
#align finsupp.map_range_single Finsupp.mapRange_single
theorem support_mapRange_of_injective {e : M → N} (he0 : e 0 = 0) (f : ι →₀ M)
(he : Function.Injective e) : (Finsupp.mapRange e he0 f).support = f.support := by
ext
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Ne, Finsupp.mapRange_apply]
exact he.ne_iff' he0
#align finsupp.support_map_range_of_injective Finsupp.support_mapRange_of_injective
end MapRange
/-! ### Declarations about `embDomain` -/
section EmbDomain
variable [Zero M] [Zero N]
/-- Given `f : α ↪ β` and `v : α →₀ M`, `Finsupp.embDomain f v : β →₀ M`
is the finitely supported function whose value at `f a : β` is `v a`.
For a `b : β` outside the range of `f`, it is zero. -/
def embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : β →₀ M where
support := v.support.map f
toFun a₂ :=
haveI := Classical.decEq β
if h : a₂ ∈ v.support.map f then
v
(v.support.choose (fun a₁ => f a₁ = a₂)
(by
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact ExistsUnique.intro a ⟨ha, rfl⟩ fun b ⟨_, hb⟩ => f.injective hb))
else 0
mem_support_toFun a₂ := by
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· simp only [h, true_iff_iff, Ne]
rw [← not_mem_support_iff, not_not]
classical apply Finset.choose_mem
· simp only [h, Ne, ne_self_iff_false, not_true_eq_false]
#align finsupp.emb_domain Finsupp.embDomain
@[simp]
theorem support_embDomain (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) : (embDomain f v).support = v.support.map f :=
rfl
#align finsupp.support_emb_domain Finsupp.support_embDomain
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_zero (f : α ↪ β) : (embDomain f 0 : β →₀ M) = 0 :=
rfl
#align finsupp.emb_domain_zero Finsupp.embDomain_zero
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_apply (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : α) : embDomain f v (f a) = v a := by
classical
change dite _ _ _ = _
split_ifs with h <;> rw [Finset.mem_map' f] at h
· refine congr_arg (v : α → M) (f.inj' ?_)
exact Finset.choose_property (fun a₁ => f a₁ = f a) _ _
· exact (not_mem_support_iff.1 h).symm
#align finsupp.emb_domain_apply Finsupp.embDomain_apply
theorem embDomain_notin_range (f : α ↪ β) (v : α →₀ M) (a : β) (h : a ∉ Set.range f) :
embDomain f v a = 0 := by
classical
refine dif_neg (mt (fun h => ?_) h)
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 h with ⟨a, _h, rfl⟩
exact Set.mem_range_self a
#align finsupp.emb_domain_notin_range Finsupp.embDomain_notin_range
theorem embDomain_injective (f : α ↪ β) : Function.Injective (embDomain f : (α →₀ M) → β →₀ M) :=
fun l₁ l₂ h => ext fun a => by simpa only [embDomain_apply] using DFunLike.ext_iff.1 h (f a)
#align finsupp.emb_domain_injective Finsupp.embDomain_injective
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_inj {f : α ↪ β} {l₁ l₂ : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l₁ = embDomain f l₂ ↔ l₁ = l₂ :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff
#align finsupp.emb_domain_inj Finsupp.embDomain_inj
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_eq_zero {f : α ↪ β} {l : α →₀ M} : embDomain f l = 0 ↔ l = 0 :=
(embDomain_injective f).eq_iff' <| embDomain_zero f
#align finsupp.emb_domain_eq_zero Finsupp.embDomain_eq_zero
theorem embDomain_mapRange (f : α ↪ β) (g : M → N) (p : α →₀ M) (hg : g 0 = 0) :
embDomain f (mapRange g hg p) = mapRange g hg (embDomain f p) := by
ext a
by_cases h : a ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_apply, embDomain_apply, mapRange_apply]
· rw [mapRange_apply, embDomain_notin_range, embDomain_notin_range, ← hg] <;> assumption
#align finsupp.emb_domain_map_range Finsupp.embDomain_mapRange
theorem single_of_embDomain_single (l : α →₀ M) (f : α ↪ β) (a : β) (b : M) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : l.embDomain f = single a b) : ∃ x, l = single x b ∧ f x = a := by
classical
have h_map_support : Finset.map f l.support = {a} := by
rw [← support_embDomain, h, support_single_ne_zero _ hb]
have ha : a ∈ Finset.map f l.support := by simp only [h_map_support, Finset.mem_singleton]
rcases Finset.mem_map.1 ha with ⟨c, _hc₁, hc₂⟩
use c
constructor
· ext d
rw [← embDomain_apply f l, h]
by_cases h_cases : c = d
· simp only [Eq.symm h_cases, hc₂, single_eq_same]
· rw [single_apply, single_apply, if_neg, if_neg h_cases]
by_contra hfd
exact h_cases (f.injective (hc₂.trans hfd))
· exact hc₂
#align finsupp.single_of_emb_domain_single Finsupp.single_of_embDomain_single
@[simp]
theorem embDomain_single (f : α ↪ β) (a : α) (m : M) :
embDomain f (single a m) = single (f a) m := by
classical
ext b
by_cases h : b ∈ Set.range f
· rcases h with ⟨a', rfl⟩
simp [single_apply]
· simp only [embDomain_notin_range, h, single_apply, not_false_iff]
rw [if_neg]
rintro rfl
simp at h
#align finsupp.emb_domain_single Finsupp.embDomain_single
end EmbDomain
/-! ### Declarations about `zipWith` -/
section ZipWith
variable [Zero M] [Zero N] [Zero P]
/-- Given finitely supported functions `g₁ : α →₀ M` and `g₂ : α →₀ N` and function `f : M → N → P`,
`Finsupp.zipWith f hf g₁ g₂` is the finitely supported function `α →₀ P` satisfying
`zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a)`, which is well-defined when `f 0 0 = 0`. -/
def zipWith (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (g₁ : α →₀ M) (g₂ : α →₀ N) : α →₀ P :=
onFinset
(haveI := Classical.decEq α; g₁.support ∪ g₂.support)
(fun a => f (g₁ a) (g₂ a))
fun a (H : f _ _ ≠ 0) => by
classical
rw [mem_union, mem_support_iff, mem_support_iff, ← not_and_or]
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩; rw [h₁, h₂] at H; exact H hf
#align finsupp.zip_with Finsupp.zipWith
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_apply {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M} {g₂ : α →₀ N} {a : α} :
zipWith f hf g₁ g₂ a = f (g₁ a) (g₂ a) :=
rfl
#align finsupp.zip_with_apply Finsupp.zipWith_apply
theorem support_zipWith [D : DecidableEq α] {f : M → N → P} {hf : f 0 0 = 0} {g₁ : α →₀ M}
{g₂ : α →₀ N} : (zipWith f hf g₁ g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim D] <;> exact support_onFinset_subset
#align finsupp.support_zip_with Finsupp.support_zipWith
@[simp]
theorem zipWith_single_single (f : M → N → P) (hf : f 0 0 = 0) (a : α) (m : M) (n : N) :
zipWith f hf (single a m) (single a n) = single a (f m n) := by
ext a'
rw [zipWith_apply]
obtain rfl | ha' := eq_or_ne a a'
· rw [single_eq_same, single_eq_same, single_eq_same]
· rw [single_eq_of_ne ha', single_eq_of_ne ha', single_eq_of_ne ha', hf]
end ZipWith
/-! ### Additive monoid structure on `α →₀ M` -/
section AddZeroClass
variable [AddZeroClass M]
instance instAdd : Add (α →₀ M) :=
⟨zipWith (· + ·) (add_zero 0)⟩
#align finsupp.has_add Finsupp.instAdd
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_add (f g : α →₀ M) : ⇑(f + g) = f + g := rfl
#align finsupp.coe_add Finsupp.coe_add
theorem add_apply (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M) (a : α) : (g₁ + g₂) a = g₁ a + g₂ a :=
rfl
#align finsupp.add_apply Finsupp.add_apply
theorem support_add [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} :
(g₁ + g₂).support ⊆ g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
support_zipWith
#align finsupp.support_add Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_add_eq [DecidableEq α] {g₁ g₂ : α →₀ M} (h : Disjoint g₁.support g₂.support) :
(g₁ + g₂).support = g₁.support ∪ g₂.support :=
le_antisymm support_zipWith fun a ha =>
(Finset.mem_union.1 ha).elim
(fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₂.support := disjoint_left.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, add_zero] )
fun ha => by
have : a ∉ g₁.support := disjoint_right.1 h ha
simp only [mem_support_iff, not_not] at *; simpa only [add_apply, this, zero_add]
#align finsupp.support_add_eq Finsupp.support_add_eq
@[simp]
theorem single_add (a : α) (b₁ b₂ : M) : single a (b₁ + b₂) = single a b₁ + single a b₂ :=
(zipWith_single_single _ _ _ _ _).symm
#align finsupp.single_add Finsupp.single_add
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (α →₀ M) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addZeroClass _ coe_zero coe_add
#align finsupp.add_zero_class Finsupp.instAddZeroClass
instance instIsLeftCancelAdd [IsLeftCancelAdd M] : IsLeftCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_left_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_left_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
/-- When ι is finite and M is an AddMonoid,
then Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite gives an AddEquiv -/
noncomputable def addEquivFunOnFinite {ι : Type*} [Finite ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ (ι → M) where
__ := Finsupp.equivFunOnFinite
map_add' _ _ := rfl
/-- AddEquiv between (ι →₀ M) and M, when ι has a unique element -/
noncomputable def _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique {ι : Type*} [Unique ι] :
(ι →₀ M) ≃+ M where
__ := Equiv.finsuppUnique
map_add' _ _ := rfl
lemma _root_.AddEquiv.finsuppUnique_symm {M : Type*} [AddZeroClass M] (d : M) :
AddEquiv.finsuppUnique.symm d = single () d := by
rw [Finsupp.unique_single (AddEquiv.finsuppUnique.symm d), Finsupp.unique_single_eq_iff]
simp [AddEquiv.finsuppUnique]
instance instIsRightCancelAdd [IsRightCancelAdd M] : IsRightCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
add_right_cancel _ _ _ h := ext fun x => add_right_cancel <| DFunLike.congr_fun h x
instance instIsCancelAdd [IsCancelAdd M] : IsCancelAdd (α →₀ M) where
/-- `Finsupp.single` as an `AddMonoidHom`.
See `Finsupp.lsingle` in `LinearAlgebra/Finsupp` for the stronger version as a linear map. -/
@[simps]
def singleAddHom (a : α) : M →+ α →₀ M where
toFun := single a
map_zero' := single_zero a
map_add' := single_add a
#align finsupp.single_add_hom Finsupp.singleAddHom
/-- Evaluation of a function `f : α →₀ M` at a point as an additive monoid homomorphism.
See `Finsupp.lapply` in `LinearAlgebra/Finsupp` for the stronger version as a linear map. -/
@[simps apply]
def applyAddHom (a : α) : (α →₀ M) →+ M where
toFun g := g a
map_zero' := zero_apply
map_add' _ _ := add_apply _ _ _
#align finsupp.apply_add_hom Finsupp.applyAddHom
#align finsupp.apply_add_hom_apply Finsupp.applyAddHom_apply
/-- Coercion from a `Finsupp` to a function type is an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def coeFnAddHom : (α →₀ M) →+ α → M where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
#align finsupp.coe_fn_add_hom Finsupp.coeFnAddHom
#align finsupp.coe_fn_add_hom_apply Finsupp.coeFnAddHom_apply
theorem update_eq_single_add_erase (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) :
f.update a b = single a b + f.erase a := by
classical
ext j
rcases eq_or_ne a j with (rfl | h)
· simp
· simp [Function.update_noteq h.symm, single_apply, h, erase_ne, h.symm]
#align finsupp.update_eq_single_add_erase Finsupp.update_eq_single_add_erase
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Defs.lean | 1,109 | 1,115 | theorem update_eq_erase_add_single (f : α →₀ M) (a : α) (b : M) :
f.update a b = f.erase a + single a b := by |
classical
ext j
rcases eq_or_ne a j with (rfl | h)
· simp
· simp [Function.update_noteq h.symm, single_apply, h, erase_ne, h.symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Instances
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Pi
/-!
# Maps (semi)conjugating a shift to a shift
Denote by $S^1$ the unit circle `UnitAddCircle`.
A common way to study a self-map $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree `1`
is to lift it to a map $\tilde f\colon \mathbb R\to \mathbb R$
such that $\tilde f(x + 1) = \tilde f(x)+1$ for all `x`.
In this file we define a structure and a typeclass
for bundled maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
We use parameters `a` and `b` instead of `1` to accomodate for two use cases:
- maps between circles of different lengths;
- self-maps $f\colon S^1\to S^1$ of degree other than one,
including orientation-reversing maps.
-/
open Function Set
/-- A bundled map `f : G → H` such that `f (x + a) = f x + b` for all `x`.
One can think about `f` as a lift to `G` of a map between two `AddCircle`s. -/
structure AddConstMap (G H : Type*) [Add G] [Add H] (a : G) (b : H) where
/-- The underlying function of an `AddConstMap`.
Use automatic coercion to function instead. -/
protected toFun : G → H
/-- An `AddConstMap` satisfies `f (x + a) = f x + b`. Use `map_add_const` instead. -/
map_add_const' (x : G) : toFun (x + a) = toFun x + b
@[inherit_doc]
scoped [AddConstMap] notation:25 G " →+c[" a ", " b "] " H => AddConstMap G H a b
/-- Typeclass for maps satisfying `f (x + a) = f x + b`.
Note that `a` and `b` are `outParam`s,
so one should not add instances like
`[AddConstMapClass F G H a b] : AddConstMapClass F G H (-a) (-b)`. -/
class AddConstMapClass (F : Type*) (G H : outParam Type*) [Add G] [Add H]
(a : outParam G) (b : outParam H) extends DFunLike F G fun _ ↦ H where
/-- A map of `AddConstMapClass` class semiconjugates shift by `a` to the shift by `b`:
`∀ x, f (x + a) = f x + b`. -/
map_add_const (f : F) (x : G) : f (x + a) = f x + b
namespace AddConstMapClass
/-!
### Properties of `AddConstMapClass` maps
In this section we prove properties like `f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b`.
-/
attribute [simp] map_add_const
variable {F G H : Type*} {a : G} {b : H}
protected theorem semiconj [Add G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
Semiconj f (· + a) (· + b) :=
map_add_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nsmul [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n • a) = f x + n • b := by
simpa using (AddConstMapClass.semiconj f).iterate_right n x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n • b := by simp [← map_add_nsmul]
theorem map_add_one [AddMonoidWithOne G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) : f (x + 1) = f x + b := map_add_const f x
@[simp]
theorem map_add_ofNat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + no_index (OfNat.ofNat n)) = f x + (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) • b :=
map_add_nat' f x n
theorem map_add_nat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) : f (x + n) = f x + n := by simp
theorem map_add_ofNat [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoidWithOne H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 1]
(f : F) (x : G) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
f (x + OfNat.ofNat n) = f x + OfNat.ofNat n := map_add_nat f x n
@[simp]
theorem map_const [AddZeroClass G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b] (f : F) :
f a = f 0 + b := by
simpa using map_add_const f 0
theorem map_one [AddZeroClass G] [One G] [Add H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b] (f : F) :
f 1 = f 0 + b :=
map_const f
@[simp]
theorem map_nsmul_const [AddMonoid G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H a b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f (n • a) = f 0 + n • b := by
simpa using map_add_nsmul f 0 n
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/AddConstMap/Basic.lean | 112 | 114 | theorem map_nat' [AddMonoidWithOne G] [AddMonoid H] [AddConstMapClass F G H 1 b]
(f : F) (n : ℕ) : f n = f 0 + n • b := by |
simpa using map_add_nat' f 0 n
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
#align_import order.upper_lower.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c0c52abb75074ed8b73a948341f50521fbf43b4c"
/-!
# Up-sets and down-sets
This file defines upper and lower sets in an order.
## Main declarations
* `IsUpperSet`: Predicate for a set to be an upper set. This means every element greater than a
member of the set is in the set itself.
* `IsLowerSet`: Predicate for a set to be a lower set. This means every element less than a member
of the set is in the set itself.
* `UpperSet`: The type of upper sets.
* `LowerSet`: The type of lower sets.
* `upperClosure`: The greatest upper set containing a set.
* `lowerClosure`: The least lower set containing a set.
* `UpperSet.Ici`: Principal upper set. `Set.Ici` as an upper set.
* `UpperSet.Ioi`: Strict principal upper set. `Set.Ioi` as an upper set.
* `LowerSet.Iic`: Principal lower set. `Set.Iic` as a lower set.
* `LowerSet.Iio`: Strict principal lower set. `Set.Iio` as a lower set.
## Notation
* `×ˢ` is notation for `UpperSet.prod` / `LowerSet.prod`.
## Notes
Upper sets are ordered by **reverse** inclusion. This convention is motivated by the fact that this
makes them order-isomorphic to lower sets and antichains, and matches the convention on `Filter`.
## TODO
Lattice structure on antichains. Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
/-! ### Unbundled upper/lower sets -/
section LE
variable [LE α] [LE β] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
/-- An upper set in an order `α` is a set such that any element greater than one of its members is
also a member. Also called up-set, upward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsUpperSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a ≤ b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_upper_set IsUpperSet
/-- A lower set in an order `α` is a set such that any element less than one of its members is also
a member. Also called down-set, downward-closed set. -/
@[aesop norm unfold]
def IsLowerSet (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b ≤ a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s
#align is_lower_set IsLowerSet
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_empty isUpperSet_empty
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_empty isLowerSet_empty
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_upper_set_univ isUpperSet_univ
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
#align is_lower_set_univ isLowerSet_univ
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_upper_set.compl IsUpperSet.compl
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
#align is_lower_set.compl IsLowerSet.compl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
#align is_upper_set_compl isUpperSet_compl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
#align is_lower_set_compl isLowerSet_compl
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.union IsUpperSet.union
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.union IsLowerSet.union
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_upper_set.inter IsUpperSet.inter
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
#align is_lower_set.inter IsLowerSet.inter
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_upper_set_sUnion isUpperSet_sUnion
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
#align is_lower_set_sUnion isLowerSet_sUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Union isUpperSet_iUnion
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Union isLowerSet_iUnion
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Union₂ isUpperSet_iUnion₂
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Union₂ isLowerSet_iUnion₂
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_upper_set_sInter isUpperSet_sInter
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
#align is_lower_set_sInter isLowerSet_sInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_upper_set_Inter isUpperSet_iInter
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
#align is_lower_set_Inter isLowerSet_iInter
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_upper_set_Inter₂ isUpperSet_iInter₂
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
#align is_lower_set_Inter₂ isLowerSet_iInter₂
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_of_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_lower_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
#align is_upper_set_preimage_to_dual_iff isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.to_dual IsUpperSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.to_dual IsLowerSet.toDual
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_upper_set.of_dual IsUpperSet.ofDual
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
#align is_lower_set.of_dual IsLowerSet.ofDual
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
#align is_upper_set_Ici isUpperSet_Ici
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
#align is_lower_set_Iic isLowerSet_Iic
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
#align is_upper_set_Ioi isUpperSet_Ioi
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
#align is_lower_set_Iio isLowerSet_Iio
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_upper_set_iff_Ici_subset isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
#align is_lower_set_iff_Iic_subset isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
#align is_upper_set.Ici_subset IsUpperSet.Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
#align is_lower_set.Iic_subset IsLowerSet.Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
#align is_upper_set.Ioi_subset IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
#align is_lower_set.Iio_subset IsLowerSet.Iio_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
#align is_upper_set.ord_connected IsUpperSet.ordConnected
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
#align is_lower_set.ord_connected IsLowerSet.ordConnected
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_upper_set.preimage IsUpperSet.preimage
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
#align is_lower_set.preimage IsLowerSet.preimage
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
#align is_upper_set.image IsUpperSet.image
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 292 | 295 | theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by |
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Kexing Ying, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FinsuppVectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Basis
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Nondegenerate
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.NonsingularInverse
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLinearEquiv
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.SesquilinearForm
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Bilinear
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.sesquilinear_form from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"84582d2872fb47c0c17eec7382dc097c9ec7137a"
/-!
# Sesquilinear form
This file defines the conversion between sesquilinear forms and matrices.
## Main definitions
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂` given a basis define a bilinear form
* `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'` define the bilinear form on `n → R`
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form
* `LinearMap.toMatrix₂'`: calculate the matrix coefficients of a bilinear form on `n → R`
## Todos
At the moment this is quite a literal port from `Matrix.BilinearForm`. Everything should be
generalized to fully semibilinear forms.
## Tags
sesquilinear_form, matrix, basis
-/
variable {R R₁ R₂ M M₁ M₂ M₁' M₂' n m n' m' ι : Type*}
open Finset LinearMap Matrix
open Matrix
section AuxToLinearMap
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable (σ₁ : R₁ →+* R) (σ₂ : R₂ →+* R)
/-- The map from `Matrix n n R` to bilinear forms on `n → R`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMap₂'`. -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m R) : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R :=
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
mk₂'ₛₗ σ₁ σ₂ (fun (v : n → R₁) (w : m → R₂) => ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (v i) * f i j * σ₂ (w j))
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, add_mul, sum_add_distrib])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_sum])
(fun _ _ _ => by simp only [Pi.add_apply, map_add, mul_add, sum_add_distrib]) fun _ _ _ => by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm, mul_sum]
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_aux Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis (f : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) = f i j := by
rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux, mk₂'ₛₗ_apply]
have : (∑ i', ∑ j', (if i = i' then 1 else 0) * f i' j' * if j = j' then 1 else 0) = f i j := by
simp_rw [mul_assoc, ← Finset.mul_sum]
simp only [boole_mul, Finset.sum_ite_eq, Finset.mem_univ, if_true, mul_comm (f _ _)]
rw [← this]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => by simp
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_aux_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis
end AuxToLinearMap
section AuxToMatrix
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
/-- The linear map from sesquilinear forms to `Matrix n m R` given an `n`-indexed basis for `M₁`
and an `m`-indexed basis for `M₂`.
This is an auxiliary definition for the equivalence `Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'`. -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂) :
(M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) →ₗ[R] Matrix n m R where
toFun f := of fun i j => f (b₁ i) (b₂ j)
map_add' _f _g := rfl
map_smul' _f _g := rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_aux LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply (f : M₁ →ₛₗ[σ₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) (b₁ : n → M₁) (b₂ : m → M₂)
(i : n) (j : m) : LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux b₁ b₂ f i j = f (b₁ i) (b₂ j) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂_aux_apply LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply
end CommSemiring
section CommRing
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
theorem LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux (f : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(fun j => stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) f) =
f := by
refine ext_basis (Pi.basisFun R₁ n) (Pi.basisFun R₂ m) fun i j => ?_
simp_rw [Pi.basisFun_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis, LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply]
#align linear_map.to_linear_map₂'_aux_to_matrix₂_aux LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux
theorem Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux (f : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(fun j => LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) (f.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂) =
f := by
ext i j
simp_rw [LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux_apply, Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis]
#align matrix.to_matrix₂_aux_to_linear_map₂'_aux Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux
end CommRing
end AuxToMatrix
section ToMatrix'
/-! ### Bilinear forms over `n → R`
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and sesquilinear forms on `n → R`.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring R₁] [Semiring R₂]
variable [Fintype n] [Fintype m]
variable [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq m]
variable {σ₁ : R₁ →+* R} {σ₂ : R₂ →+* R}
/-- The linear equivalence between sesquilinear forms and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' : ((n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
{
LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux (fun i => stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1) fun j =>
stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j
1 with
toFun := LinearMap.toMatrix₂Aux _ _
invFun := Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂
left_inv := LinearMap.toLinearMap₂'Aux_toMatrix₂Aux
right_inv := Matrix.toMatrix₂Aux_toLinearMap₂'Aux }
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂' LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'
/-- The linear equivalence between bilinear forms and `n × m` matrices -/
def LinearMap.toMatrix₂' : ((n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂' LinearMap.toMatrix₂'
variable (σ₁ σ₂)
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and sesquilinear forms on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂' Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'
/-- The linear equivalence between `n × n` matrices and bilinear forms on `n → R` -/
def Matrix.toLinearMap₂' : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'.symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq (M : Matrix n m R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux σ₁ σ₂ M = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_aux_eq
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m R) (x : n → R₁) (y : m → R₂) :
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, σ₁ (x i) * M i j * σ₂ (y j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_apply Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_apply
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply (M : Matrix n m R) (x : n → R) (y : m → R) :
-- Porting note: we don't seem to have `∑ i j` as valid notation yet
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M x y = ∑ i, ∑ j, x i * M i j * y j :=
rfl
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_apply Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply' (M : Matrix n m R) (v : n → R) (w : m → R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M v w = Matrix.dotProduct v (M *ᵥ w) := by
simp_rw [Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply, Matrix.dotProduct, Matrix.mulVec, Matrix.dotProduct]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [Finset.mul_sum]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun _ _ => ?_
rw [← mul_assoc]
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_apply' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_apply'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_stdBasis (M : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M (LinearMap.stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis σ₁ σ₂ M i j
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_stdBasis (M : Matrix n m R) (i : n) (j : m) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M (LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i 1)
(LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) j 1) = M i j :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'Aux_stdBasis _ _ M i j
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_std_basis Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_stdBasis
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_symm :
(LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] _) = Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂'_symm LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_symm :
((Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂).symm : _ ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R) = LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.symm_symm
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_symm Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_symm
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ (LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' B) = B :=
(Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂).apply_symm_apply B
#align matrix.to_linear_mapₛₗ₂'_to_matrix' Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂'_toMatrix'
@[simp]
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_toMatrix' (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) :
Matrix.toLinearMap₂' (LinearMap.toMatrix₂' B) = B :=
Matrix.toLinearMap₂'.apply_symm_apply B
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_to_matrix' Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_toMatrix'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMapₛₗ₂' (M : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' (Matrix.toLinearMapₛₗ₂' σ₁ σ₂ M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.apply_symm_apply M
#align linear_map.to_matrix'_to_linear_mapₛₗ₂' LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMapₛₗ₂'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂' (M : Matrix n m R) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' (Matrix.toLinearMap₂' M) = M :=
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'.apply_symm_apply M
#align linear_map.to_matrix'_to_linear_map₂' LinearMap.toMatrix'_toLinearMap₂'
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_apply (B : (n → R₁) →ₛₗ[σ₁] (m → R₂) →ₛₗ[σ₂] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂' B i j =
B (stdBasis R₁ (fun _ => R₁) i 1) (stdBasis R₂ (fun _ => R₂) j 1) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrixₛₗ₂'_apply LinearMap.toMatrixₛₗ₂'_apply
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂' B i j = B (stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i 1) (stdBasis R (fun _ => R) j 1) :=
rfl
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_apply LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply
variable [Fintype n'] [Fintype m']
variable [DecidableEq n'] [DecidableEq m']
@[simp]
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (l : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R)
(r : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.compl₁₂ l r) = (toMatrix' l)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' B * toMatrix' r := by
ext i j
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearMap.compl₁₂_apply, transpose_apply, Matrix.mul_apply,
LinearMap.toMatrix', LinearEquiv.coe_mk, sum_mul]
rw [sum_comm]
conv_lhs => rw [← LinearMap.sum_repr_mul_repr_mul (Pi.basisFun R n) (Pi.basisFun R m) (l _) (r _)]
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro i' -
rw [Finsupp.sum_fintype]
· apply sum_congr rfl
rintro j' -
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Pi.basisFun_repr, mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_left_comm,
Pi.basisFun_apply, of_apply]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, smul_zero]
· intros
simp only [zero_smul, Finsupp.sum_zero]
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_compl₁₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₁₂
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (n' → R) →ₗ[R] n → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.comp f) = (toMatrix' f)ᵀ * toMatrix₂' B := by
rw [← LinearMap.compl₂_id (B.comp f), ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_comp LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_comp
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂ (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (f : (m' → R) →ₗ[R] m → R) :
toMatrix₂' (B.compl₂ f) = toMatrix₂' B * toMatrix' f := by
rw [← LinearMap.comp_id B, ← LinearMap.compl₁₂]
simp
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_compl₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_compl₂
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R)
(N : Matrix m m' R) : M * toMatrix₂' B * N = toMatrix₂' (B.compl₁₂ (toLin' Mᵀ) (toLin' N)) := by
simp
#align linear_map.mul_to_matrix₂'_mul LinearMap.mul_toMatrix₂'_mul
theorem LinearMap.mul_toMatrix' (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix n' n R) :
M * toMatrix₂' B = toMatrix₂' (B.comp <| toLin' Mᵀ) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_comp, transpose_transpose, toMatrix'_toLin']
#align linear_map.mul_to_matrix' LinearMap.mul_toMatrix'
theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_mul (B : (n → R) →ₗ[R] (m → R) →ₗ[R] R) (M : Matrix m m' R) :
toMatrix₂' B * M = toMatrix₂' (B.compl₂ <| toLin' M) := by
simp only [B.toMatrix₂'_compl₂, toMatrix'_toLin']
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂'_mul LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_mul
theorem Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_comp (M : Matrix n m R) (P : Matrix n n' R) (Q : Matrix m m' R) :
M.toLinearMap₂'.compl₁₂ (toLin' P) (toLin' Q) = toLinearMap₂' (Pᵀ * M * Q) :=
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'.injective (by simp)
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂'_comp Matrix.toLinearMap₂'_comp
end ToMatrix'
section ToMatrix
/-! ### Bilinear forms over arbitrary vector spaces
This section deals with the conversion between matrices and bilinear forms on
a module with a fixed basis.
-/
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable [DecidableEq n] [Fintype n]
variable [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m]
variable (b₁ : Basis n R M₁) (b₂ : Basis m R M₂)
/-- `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively. -/
noncomputable def LinearMap.toMatrix₂ : (M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) ≃ₗ[R] Matrix n m R :=
(b₁.equivFun.arrowCongr (b₂.equivFun.arrowCongr (LinearEquiv.refl R R))).trans
LinearMap.toMatrix₂'
#align linear_map.to_matrix₂ LinearMap.toMatrix₂
/-- `Matrix.toLinearMap₂ b₁ b₂` is the equivalence between `R`-bilinear forms on `M` and
`n`-by-`m` matrices with entries in `R`, if `b₁` and `b₂` are `R`-bases for `M₁` and `M₂`,
respectively; this is the reverse direction of `LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂`. -/
noncomputable def Matrix.toLinearMap₂ : Matrix n m R ≃ₗ[R] M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R :=
(LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂).symm
#align matrix.to_linear_map₂ Matrix.toLinearMap₂
-- We make this and not `LinearMap.toMatrix₂` a `simp` lemma to avoid timeouts
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/SesquilinearForm.lean | 358 | 362 | theorem LinearMap.toMatrix₂_apply (B : M₁ →ₗ[R] M₂ →ₗ[R] R) (i : n) (j : m) :
LinearMap.toMatrix₂ b₁ b₂ B i j = B (b₁ i) (b₂ j) := by |
simp only [LinearMap.toMatrix₂, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply,
LinearEquiv.trans_apply, LinearMap.toMatrix₂'_apply, LinearEquiv.arrowCongr_apply,
Basis.equivFun_symm_stdBasis, LinearEquiv.refl_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Alex Meiburg
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
#align_import data.polynomial.erase_lead from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fa256f00ce018e7b40e1dc756e403c86680bf448"
/-!
# Erase the leading term of a univariate polynomial
## Definition
* `eraseLead f`: the polynomial `f - leading term of f`
`eraseLead` serves as reduction step in an induction, shaving off one monomial from a polynomial.
The definition is set up so that it does not mention subtraction in the definition,
and thus works for polynomials over semirings as well as rings.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Polynomial Finset
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] {f : R[X]}
/-- `eraseLead f` for a polynomial `f` is the polynomial obtained by
subtracting from `f` the leading term of `f`. -/
def eraseLead (f : R[X]) : R[X] :=
Polynomial.erase f.natDegree f
#align polynomial.erase_lead Polynomial.eraseLead
section EraseLead
theorem eraseLead_support (f : R[X]) : f.eraseLead.support = f.support.erase f.natDegree := by
simp only [eraseLead, support_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support Polynomial.eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_coeff (i : ℕ) :
f.eraseLead.coeff i = if i = f.natDegree then 0 else f.coeff i := by
simp only [eraseLead, coeff_erase]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_coeff_natDegree : f.eraseLead.coeff f.natDegree = 0 := by simp [eraseLead_coeff]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_nat_degree Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_natDegree
theorem eraseLead_coeff_of_ne (i : ℕ) (hi : i ≠ f.natDegree) : f.eraseLead.coeff i = f.coeff i := by
simp [eraseLead_coeff, hi]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_coeff_of_ne Polynomial.eraseLead_coeff_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_zero : eraseLead (0 : R[X]) = 0 := by simp only [eraseLead, erase_zero]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_zero
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (f.monomial_add_erase _)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow (f : R[X]) :
f.eraseLead + C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.erase_lead_add_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.eraseLead_add_C_mul_X_pow
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - monomial f.natDegree f.leadingCoeff = f.eraseLead :=
(eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mpr (eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff f)).symm
#align polynomial.self_sub_monomial_nat_degree_leading_coeff Polynomial.self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_C_mul_X_pow {R : Type*} [Ring R] (f : R[X]) :
f - C f.leadingCoeff * X ^ f.natDegree = f.eraseLead := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, self_sub_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.self_sub_C_mul_X_pow
theorem eraseLead_ne_zero (f0 : 2 ≤ f.support.card) : eraseLead f ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, ← card_support_eq_zero, eraseLead_support]
exact
(zero_lt_one.trans_le <| (tsub_le_tsub_right f0 1).trans Finset.pred_card_le_card_erase).ne.symm
#align polynomial.erase_lead_ne_zero Polynomial.eraseLead_ne_zero
theorem lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a < f.natDegree := by
rw [eraseLead_support, mem_erase] at h
exact (le_natDegree_of_mem_supp a h.2).lt_of_ne h.1
#align polynomial.lt_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support {a : ℕ} (h : a ∈ (eraseLead f).support) :
a ≠ f.natDegree :=
(lt_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h).ne
#align polynomial.ne_nat_degree_of_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support : f.natDegree ∉ (eraseLead f).support := fun h =>
ne_natDegree_of_mem_eraseLead_support h rfl
#align polynomial.nat_degree_not_mem_erase_lead_support Polynomial.natDegree_not_mem_eraseLead_support
theorem eraseLead_support_card_lt (h : f ≠ 0) : (eraseLead f).support.card < f.support.card := by
rw [eraseLead_support]
exact card_lt_card (erase_ssubset <| natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h)
#align polynomial.erase_lead_support_card_lt Polynomial.eraseLead_support_card_lt
theorem card_support_eraseLead_add_one (h : f ≠ 0) :
f.eraseLead.support.card + 1 = f.support.card := by
set c := f.support.card with hc
cases h₁ : c
case zero =>
by_contra
exact h (card_support_eq_zero.mp h₁)
case succ =>
rw [eraseLead_support, card_erase_of_mem (natDegree_mem_support_of_nonzero h), ← hc, h₁]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_support_eraseLead : f.eraseLead.support.card = f.support.card - 1 := by
by_cases hf : f = 0
· rw [hf, eraseLead_zero, support_zero, card_empty]
· rw [← card_support_eraseLead_add_one hf, add_tsub_cancel_right]
theorem card_support_eraseLead' {c : ℕ} (fc : f.support.card = c + 1) :
f.eraseLead.support.card = c := by
rw [card_support_eraseLead, fc, add_tsub_cancel_right]
#align polynomial.erase_lead_card_support' Polynomial.card_support_eraseLead'
theorem card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h₀ : f ≠ 0) (h₁ : f.eraseLead = 0) :
f.support.card = 1 :=
(card_support_eq_zero.mpr h₁ ▸ card_support_eraseLead_add_one h₀).symm
theorem card_support_le_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero (h : f.eraseLead = 0) : f.support.card ≤ 1 := by
by_cases hpz : f = 0
case pos => simp [hpz]
case neg => exact le_of_eq (card_support_eq_one_of_eraseLead_eq_zero hpz h)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/EraseLead.lean | 147 | 152 | theorem eraseLead_monomial (i : ℕ) (r : R) : eraseLead (monomial i r) = 0 := by |
classical
by_cases hr : r = 0
· subst r
simp only [monomial_zero_right, eraseLead_zero]
· rw [eraseLead, natDegree_monomial, if_neg hr, erase_monomial]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
/-!
# ℤ-lattices
Let `E` be a finite dimensional vector space over a `NormedLinearOrderedField` `K` with a solid
norm that is also a `FloorRing`, e.g. `ℝ`. A (full) `ℤ`-lattice `L` of `E` is a discrete
subgroup of `E` such that `L` spans `E` over `K`.
A `ℤ`-lattice `L` can be defined in two ways:
* For `b` a basis of `E`, then `L = Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)` is a ℤ-lattice of `E`
* As an `AddSubgroup E` with the additional properties:
* `DiscreteTopology L`, that is `L` is discrete
* `Submodule.span ℝ (L : Set E) = ⊤`, that is `L` spans `E` over `K`.
Results about the first point of view are in the `Zspan` namespace and results about the second
point of view are in the `Zlattice` namespace.
## Main results
* `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`: for a ℤ-lattice `Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)`, proves that
the set defined by `Zspan.fundamentalDomain` is a fundamental domain.
* `Zlattice.module_free`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module
* `Zlattice.rank`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module of `ℤ`-rank equal to the `K`-rank of `E`
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
/-- The fundamental domain of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b`. See `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`
for the proof that it is a fundamental domain. -/
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fundamentalDomain_reindex {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
fundamentalDomain (b.reindex e) = fundamentalDomain b := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.repr_reindex_apply]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr' e]
simp_rw [implies_true]
lemma fundamentalDomain_pi_basisFun [Fintype ι] :
fundamentalDomain (Pi.basisFun ℝ ι) = Set.pi Set.univ fun _ : ι ↦ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
ext; simp
variable [FloorRing K]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding down its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def floor (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌊b.repr m i⌋ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.floor Zspan.floor
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding up its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def ceil (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌈b.repr m i⌉ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.ceil Zspan.ceil
@[simp]
theorem repr_floor_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (floor b m) i = ⌊b.repr m i⌋ := by
classical simp only [floor, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_floor_apply Zspan.repr_floor_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_ceil_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (ceil b m) i = ⌈b.repr m i⌉ := by
classical simp only [ceil, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
#align zspan.repr_ceil_apply Zspan.repr_ceil_apply
@[simp]
theorem floor_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (floor b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_floor_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.floor_intCast z)
#align zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.floor_eq_self_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem ceil_eq_self_of_mem (m : E) (h : m ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) : (ceil b m : E) = m := by
apply b.ext_elem
simp_rw [repr_ceil_apply b]
intro i
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := (b.mem_span_iff_repr_mem ℤ _).mp h i
rw [← hz]
exact congr_arg (Int.cast : ℤ → K) (Int.ceil_intCast z)
#align zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem Zspan.ceil_eq_self_of_mem
/-- The map that sends a vector `E` to the `fundamentalDomain` of the lattice,
see `Zspan.fract_mem_fundamentalDomain`, and `fractRestrict` for the map with the codomain
restricted to `fundamentalDomain`. -/
def fract (m : E) : E := m - floor b m
#align zspan.fract Zspan.fract
theorem fract_apply (m : E) : fract b m = m - floor b m := rfl
#align zspan.fract_apply Zspan.fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem repr_fract_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (fract b m) i = Int.fract (b.repr m i) := by
rw [fract, map_sub, Finsupp.coe_sub, Pi.sub_apply, repr_floor_apply, Int.fract]
#align zspan.repr_fract_apply Zspan.repr_fract_apply
@[simp]
theorem fract_fract (m : E) : fract b (fract b m) = fract b m :=
Basis.ext_elem b fun _ => by classical simp only [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_fract]
#align zspan.fract_fract Zspan.fract_fract
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 155 | 162 | theorem fract_zspan_add (m : E) {v : E} (h : v ∈ span ℤ (Set.range b)) :
fract b (v + m) = fract b m := by |
classical
refine (Basis.ext_elem_iff b).mpr fun i => ?_
simp_rw [repr_fract_apply, Int.fract_eq_fract]
use (b.restrictScalars ℤ).repr ⟨v, h⟩ i
rw [map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply, add_tsub_cancel_right,
← eq_intCast (algebraMap ℤ K) _, Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply, coe_mk]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Scott Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.OrderIsoNat
#align_import data.nat.nth from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"7fdd4f3746cb059edfdb5d52cba98f66fce418c0"
/-!
# The `n`th Number Satisfying a Predicate
This file defines a function for "what is the `n`th number that satisifies a given predicate `p`",
and provides lemmas that deal with this function and its connection to `Nat.count`.
## Main definitions
* `Nat.nth p n`: The `n`-th natural `k` (zero-indexed) such that `p k`. If there is no
such natural (that is, `p` is true for at most `n` naturals), then `Nat.nth p n = 0`.
## Main results
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin`: For a fintely-often true `p`, gives the cardinality of the set of
numbers satisfying `p` above particular values of `nth p`
* `Nat.gc_count_nth`: Establishes a Galois connection between `Nat.nth p` and `Nat.count p`.
* `Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat`: For an infinitely-ofter true predicate, `nth` agrees with the
order-isomorphism of the subtype to the natural numbers.
There has been some discussion on the subject of whether both of `nth` and
`Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` should exist. See discussion
[here](https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/9457#pullrequestreview-767221180).
Future work should address how lemmas that use these should be written.
-/
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
/-- Find the `n`-th natural number satisfying `p` (indexed from `0`, so `nth p 0` is the first
natural number satisfying `p`), or `0` if there is no such number. See also
`Subtype.orderIsoOfNat` for the order isomorphism with ℕ when `p` is infinitely often true. -/
noncomputable def nth (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : ℕ := by
classical exact
if h : Set.Finite (setOf p) then (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0
else @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) (Set.Infinite.to_subtype h) n
#align nat.nth Nat.nth
variable {p}
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on a finite set
-/
theorem nth_of_card_le (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : hf.toFinset.card ≤ n) :
nth p n = 0 := by rw [nth, dif_pos hf, List.getD_eq_default]; rwa [Finset.length_sort]
#align nat.nth_of_card_le Nat.nth_of_card_le
theorem nth_eq_getD_sort (h : (setOf p).Finite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = (h.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)).getD n 0 :=
dif_pos h
#align nat.nth_eq_nthd_sort Nat.nth_eq_getD_sort
theorem nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {n : ℕ} (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p n = hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl ⟨n, hn⟩ := by
rw [nth_eq_getD_sort hf, Finset.orderEmbOfFin_apply, List.getD_eq_get]
#align nat.nth_eq_order_emb_of_fin Nat.nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin
theorem nth_strictMonoOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) :
StrictMonoOn (nth p) (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card) := by
rintro m (hm : m < _) n (hn : n < _) h
simp only [nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin, *]
exact OrderEmbedding.strictMono _ h
#align nat.nth_strict_mono_on Nat.nth_strictMonoOn
theorem nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m < n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m < nth p n :=
nth_strictMonoOn hf (h.trans hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n)
(hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) : nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).monotoneOn (h.trans_lt hn) hn h
#align nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m < nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m < n :=
not_le.1 fun hle => h.not_le <| nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle hm
#align nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card Nat.lt_of_nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card
theorem le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {m n : ℕ} (h : nth p m ≤ nth p n)
(hm : m < hf.toFinset.card) : m ≤ n :=
not_lt.1 fun hlt => h.not_lt <| nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt hm
#align nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card Nat.le_of_nth_le_nth_of_lt_card
theorem nth_injOn (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : (Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card).InjOn (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMonoOn hf).injOn
#align nat.nth_inj_on Nat.nth_injOn
theorem range_nth_of_finite (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : Set.range (nth p) = insert 0 (setOf p) := by
simpa only [← nth_eq_getD_sort hf, mem_sort, Set.Finite.mem_toFinset]
using Set.range_list_getD (hf.toFinset.sort (· ≤ ·)) 0
#align nat.range_nth_of_finite Nat.range_nth_of_finite
@[simp]
theorem image_nth_Iio_card (hf : (setOf p).Finite) : nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = setOf p :=
calc
nth p '' Set.Iio hf.toFinset.card = Set.range (hf.toFinset.orderEmbOfFin rfl) := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_image, Set.mem_range, Fin.exists_iff, ← nth_eq_orderEmbOfFin hf,
Set.mem_Iio, exists_prop]
_ = setOf p := by rw [range_orderEmbOfFin, Set.Finite.coe_toFinset]
#align nat.image_nth_Iio_card Nat.image_nth_Iio_card
theorem nth_mem_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hlt : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
p (nth p n) :=
(image_nth_Iio_card hf).subset <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hlt
#align nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card Nat.nth_mem_of_lt_card
theorem exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq (hf : (setOf p).Finite) {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, n < hf.toFinset.card ∧ nth p n = x := by
rwa [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← image_nth_Iio_card hf] at h
#align nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq
/-!
### Lemmas about `Nat.nth` on an infinite set
-/
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
nth p n = @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype n := by rw [nth, dif_neg hf]
#align nat.nth_apply_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat
/-- When `s` is an infinite set, `nth` agrees with `Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat`. -/
theorem nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) :
nth p = (↑) ∘ @Nat.Subtype.orderIsoOfNat (setOf p) hf.to_subtype :=
funext <| nth_apply_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf
#align nat.nth_eq_order_iso_of_nat Nat.nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat
theorem nth_strictMono (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : StrictMono (nth p) := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
exact (Subtype.strictMono_coe _).comp (OrderIso.strictMono _)
#align nat.nth_strict_mono Nat.nth_strictMono
theorem nth_injective (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Function.Injective (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).injective
#align nat.nth_injective Nat.nth_injective
theorem nth_monotone (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Monotone (nth p) :=
(nth_strictMono hf).monotone
#align nat.nth_monotone Nat.nth_monotone
theorem nth_lt_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k < nth p n ↔ k < n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).lt_iff_lt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth Nat.nth_lt_nth
theorem nth_le_nth (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) {k n} : nth p k ≤ nth p n ↔ k ≤ n :=
(nth_strictMono hf).le_iff_le
#align nat.nth_le_nth Nat.nth_le_nth
theorem range_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) : Set.range (nth p) = setOf p := by
rw [nth_eq_orderIsoOfNat hf]
haveI := hf.to_subtype
-- Porting note: added `classical`; probably, Lean 3 found instance by unification
classical exact Nat.Subtype.coe_comp_ofNat_range
#align nat.range_nth_of_infinite Nat.range_nth_of_infinite
theorem nth_mem_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) : p (nth p n) :=
Set.range_subset_iff.1 (range_nth_of_infinite hf).le n
#align nat.nth_mem_of_infinite Nat.nth_mem_of_infinite
/-!
### Lemmas that work for finite and infinite sets
-/
theorem exists_lt_card_nth_eq {x} (h : p x) :
∃ n, (∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) ∧ nth p n = x := by
refine (setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => ?_) fun hf => ?_
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf h with ⟨n, hn, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun _ => hn, hx⟩
· rw [← @Set.mem_setOf_eq _ _ p, ← range_nth_of_infinite hf] at h
rcases h with ⟨n, hx⟩
exact ⟨n, fun hf' => absurd hf' hf, hx⟩
#align nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq Nat.exists_lt_card_nth_eq
theorem subset_range_nth : setOf p ⊆ Set.range (nth p) := fun x (hx : p x) =>
let ⟨n, _, hn⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx
⟨n, hn⟩
#align nat.subset_range_nth Nat.subset_range_nth
theorem range_nth_subset : Set.range (nth p) ⊆ insert 0 (setOf p) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h => (range_nth_of_finite h).subset) fun h =>
(range_nth_of_infinite h).trans_subset (Set.subset_insert _ _)
#align nat.range_nth_subset Nat.range_nth_subset
theorem nth_mem (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : p (nth p n) :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_mem_of_lt_card hf (h hf)) fun h =>
nth_mem_of_infinite h n
#align nat.nth_mem Nat.nth_mem
theorem nth_lt_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hlt : m < n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m < nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_lt_nth_of_lt_card hf hlt (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_lt_nth hf).2 hlt
#align nat.nth_lt_nth' Nat.nth_lt_nth'
theorem nth_le_nth' {m n : ℕ} (hle : m ≤ n) (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
nth p m ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hf => nth_le_nth_of_lt_card hf hle (h _)) fun hf =>
(nth_le_nth hf).2 hle
#align nat.nth_le_nth' Nat.nth_le_nth'
theorem le_nth {n : ℕ} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) : n ≤ nth p n :=
(setOf p).finite_or_infinite.elim
(fun hf => ((nth_strictMonoOn hf).mono <| Set.Iic_subset_Iio.2 (h _)).Iic_id_le _ le_rfl)
fun hf => (nth_strictMono hf).id_le _
#align nat.le_nth Nat.le_nth
theorem isLeast_nth {n} (h : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
⟨⟨nth_mem n h, fun _k hk => nth_lt_nth' hk h⟩, fun _x hx =>
let ⟨k, hk, hkx⟩ := exists_lt_card_nth_eq hx.1
(lt_or_le k n).elim (fun hlt => absurd hkx (hx.2 _ hlt).ne) fun hle => hkx ▸ nth_le_nth' hle hk⟩
#align nat.is_least_nth Nat.isLeast_nth
theorem isLeast_nth_of_lt_card {n : ℕ} (hf : (setOf p).Finite) (hn : n < hf.toFinset.card) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun _ => hn
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_lt_card Nat.isLeast_nth_of_lt_card
theorem isLeast_nth_of_infinite (hf : (setOf p).Infinite) (n : ℕ) :
IsLeast {i | p i ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < i} (nth p n) :=
isLeast_nth fun h => absurd h hf
#align nat.is_least_nth_of_infinite Nat.isLeast_nth_of_infinite
/-- An alternative recursive definition of `Nat.nth`: `Nat.nth s n` is the infimum of `x ∈ s` such
that `Nat.nth s k < x` for all `k < n`, if this set is nonempty. We do not assume that the set is
nonempty because we use the same "garbage value" `0` both for `sInf` on `ℕ` and for `Nat.nth s n`
for `n ≥ card s`. -/
theorem nth_eq_sInf (p : ℕ → Prop) (n : ℕ) : nth p n = sInf {x | p x ∧ ∀ k < n, nth p k < x} := by
by_cases hn : ∀ hf : (setOf p).Finite, n < hf.toFinset.card
· exact (isLeast_nth hn).csInf_eq.symm
· push_neg at hn
rcases hn with ⟨hf, hn⟩
rw [nth_of_card_le _ hn]
refine ((congr_arg sInf <| Set.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun k hk => ?_).trans sInf_empty).symm
rcases exists_lt_card_nth_eq hk.1 with ⟨k, hlt, rfl⟩
exact (hk.2 _ ((hlt hf).trans_le hn)).false
#align nat.nth_eq_Inf Nat.nth_eq_sInf
theorem nth_zero : nth p 0 = sInf (setOf p) := by rw [nth_eq_sInf]; simp
#align nat.nth_zero Nat.nth_zero
@[simp]
theorem nth_zero_of_zero (h : p 0) : nth p 0 = 0 := by simp [nth_zero, h]
#align nat.nth_zero_of_zero Nat.nth_zero_of_zero
theorem nth_zero_of_exists [DecidablePred p] (h : ∃ n, p n) : nth p 0 = Nat.find h := by
rw [nth_zero]; convert Nat.sInf_def h
#align nat.nth_zero_of_exists Nat.nth_zero_of_exists
theorem nth_eq_zero {n} :
nth p n = 0 ↔ p 0 ∧ n = 0 ∨ ∃ hf : (setOf p).Finite, hf.toFinset.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· simp only [or_iff_not_imp_right, not_exists, not_le]
exact fun hn => ⟨h ▸ nth_mem _ hn, nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| h ▸ le_nth hn⟩
· rintro (⟨h₀, rfl⟩ | ⟨hf, hle⟩)
exacts [nth_zero_of_zero h₀, nth_of_card_le hf hle]
#align nat.nth_eq_zero Nat.nth_eq_zero
theorem nth_eq_zero_mono (h₀ : ¬p 0) {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (ha : nth p a = 0) : nth p b = 0 := by
simp only [nth_eq_zero, h₀, false_and_iff, false_or_iff] at ha ⊢
exact ha.imp fun hf hle => hle.trans hab
#align nat.nth_eq_zero_mono Nat.nth_eq_zero_mono
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Nth.lean | 283 | 292 | theorem le_nth_of_lt_nth_succ {k a : ℕ} (h : a < nth p (k + 1)) (ha : p a) : a ≤ nth p k := by |
cases' (setOf p).finite_or_infinite with hf hf
· rcases exists_lt_card_finite_nth_eq hf ha with ⟨n, hn, rfl⟩
cases' lt_or_le (k + 1) hf.toFinset.card with hk hk
· rwa [(nth_strictMonoOn hf).lt_iff_lt hn hk, Nat.lt_succ_iff,
← (nth_strictMonoOn hf).le_iff_le hn (k.lt_succ_self.trans hk)] at h
· rw [nth_of_card_le _ hk] at h
exact absurd h (zero_le _).not_lt
· rcases subset_range_nth ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rwa [nth_lt_nth hf, Nat.lt_succ_iff, ← nth_le_nth hf] at h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel, Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Homology.ExactSequence
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Refinements
#align_import category_theory.abelian.diagram_lemmas.four from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d34cbcf6c94953e965448c933cd9cc485115ebbd"
/-!
# The four and five lemmas
Consider the following commutative diagram with exact rows in an abelian category `C`:
```
A ---f--> B ---g--> C ---h--> D ---i--> E
| | | | |
α β γ δ ε
| | | | |
v v v v v
A' --f'-> B' --g'-> C' --h'-> D' --i'-> E'
```
We show:
- the "mono" version of the four lemma: if `α` is an epimorphism and `β` and `δ` are monomorphisms,
then `γ` is a monomorphism,
- the "epi" version of the four lemma: if `β` and `δ` are epimorphisms and `ε` is a monomorphism,
then `γ` is an epimorphism,
- the five lemma: if `α`, `β`, `δ` and `ε` are isomorphisms, then `γ` is an isomorphism.
## Implementation details
The diagram of the five lemmas is given by a morphism in the category `ComposableArrows C 4`
between two objects which satisfy `ComposableArrows.Exact`. Similarly, the two versions of the
four lemma are stated in terms of the category `ComposableArrows C 3`.
The five lemmas is deduced from the two versions of the four lemma. Both of these versions
are proved separately. It would be easy to deduce the epi version from the mono version
using duality, but this would require lengthy API developments for `ComposableArrows` (TODO).
## Tags
four lemma, five lemma, diagram lemma, diagram chase
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive
namespace Abelian
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] [Abelian C]
open ComposableArrows
section Four
variable {R₁ R₂ : ComposableArrows C 3} (φ : R₁ ⟶ R₂)
theorem mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono' (hR₁ : R₁.map' 0 2 = 0)
(hR₁' : (mk₂ (R₁.map' 1 2) (R₁.map' 2 3)).Exact)
(hR₂ : (mk₂ (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2)).Exact)
(h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 1)) (h₃ : Mono (app' φ 3)) :
Mono (app' φ 2) := by
apply mono_of_cancel_zero
intro A f₂ h₁
have h₂ : f₂ ≫ R₁.map' 2 3 = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (app' φ 3 _), assoc, NatTrans.naturality, reassoc_of% h₁,
zero_comp, zero_comp]
obtain ⟨A₁, π₁, _, f₁, hf₁⟩ := (hR₁'.exact 0).exact_up_to_refinements f₂ h₂
dsimp at hf₁
have h₃ : (f₁ ≫ app' φ 1) ≫ R₂.map' 1 2 = 0 := by
rw [assoc, ← NatTrans.naturality, ← reassoc_of% hf₁, h₁, comp_zero]
obtain ⟨A₂, π₂, _, g₀, hg₀⟩ := (hR₂.exact 0).exact_up_to_refinements _ h₃
obtain ⟨A₃, π₃, _, f₀, hf₀⟩ := surjective_up_to_refinements_of_epi (app' φ 0 _) g₀
have h₄ : f₀ ≫ R₁.map' 0 1 = π₃ ≫ π₂ ≫ f₁ := by
rw [← cancel_mono (app' φ 1 _), assoc, assoc, assoc, NatTrans.naturality,
← reassoc_of% hf₀, hg₀]
rfl
rw [← cancel_epi π₁, comp_zero, hf₁, ← cancel_epi π₂, ← cancel_epi π₃, comp_zero,
comp_zero, ← reassoc_of% h₄, ← R₁.map'_comp 0 1 2, hR₁, comp_zero]
#align category_theory.abelian.mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono CategoryTheory.Abelian.mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono'
theorem mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.Exact)
(h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 1)) (h₃ : Mono (app' φ 3)) :
Mono (app' φ 2) :=
mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono' φ
(by simpa only [R₁.map'_comp 0 1 2] using hR₁.toIsComplex.zero 0)
(hR₁.exact 1).exact_toComposableArrows (hR₂.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows h₀ h₁ h₃
attribute [local instance] epi_comp
theorem epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono'
(hR₁ : (mk₂ (R₁.map' 1 2) (R₁.map' 2 3)).Exact)
(hR₂ : (mk₂ (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2)).Exact) (hR₂' : R₂.map' 1 3 = 0)
(h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₂ : Epi (app' φ 2)) (h₃ : Mono (app' φ 3)) :
Epi (app' φ 1) := by
rw [epi_iff_surjective_up_to_refinements]
intro A g₁
obtain ⟨A₁, π₁, _, f₂, h₁⟩ :=
surjective_up_to_refinements_of_epi (app' φ 2 _) (g₁ ≫ R₂.map' 1 2)
have h₂ : f₂ ≫ R₁.map' 2 3 = 0 := by
rw [← cancel_mono (app' φ 3 _), assoc, zero_comp, NatTrans.naturality, ← reassoc_of% h₁,
← R₂.map'_comp 1 2 3, hR₂', comp_zero, comp_zero]
obtain ⟨A₂, π₂, _, f₁, h₃⟩ := (hR₁.exact 0).exact_up_to_refinements _ h₂
dsimp at f₁ h₃
have h₄ : (π₂ ≫ π₁ ≫ g₁ - f₁ ≫ app' φ 1 _) ≫ R₂.map' 1 2 = 0 := by
rw [sub_comp, assoc, assoc, assoc, ← NatTrans.naturality, ← reassoc_of% h₃, h₁, sub_self]
obtain ⟨A₃, π₃, _, g₀, h₅⟩ := (hR₂.exact 0).exact_up_to_refinements _ h₄
dsimp at g₀ h₅
rw [comp_sub] at h₅
obtain ⟨A₄, π₄, _, f₀, h₆⟩ := surjective_up_to_refinements_of_epi (app' φ 0 _) g₀
refine ⟨A₄, π₄ ≫ π₃ ≫ π₂ ≫ π₁, inferInstance,
π₄ ≫ π₃ ≫ f₁ + f₀ ≫ (by exact R₁.map' 0 1), ?_⟩
rw [assoc, assoc, assoc, add_comp, assoc, assoc, assoc, NatTrans.naturality,
← reassoc_of% h₆, ← h₅, comp_sub]
dsimp
rw [add_sub_cancel]
#align category_theory.abelian.epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono CategoryTheory.Abelian.epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono'
theorem epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.Exact)
(h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₂ : Epi (app' φ 2)) (h₃ : Mono (app' φ 3)) :
Epi (app' φ 1) :=
epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono' φ (hR₁.exact 1).exact_toComposableArrows
(hR₂.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows
(by simpa only [R₂.map'_comp 1 2 3] using hR₂.toIsComplex.zero 1) h₀ h₂ h₃
end Four
section Five
variable {R₁ R₂ : ComposableArrows C 4} (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.Exact) (φ : R₁ ⟶ R₂)
#adaptation_note /-- nightly-2024-03-11
We turn off simprocs here.
Ideally someone will investigate whether `simp` lemmas can be rearranged
so that this works without the `set_option`,
*or* come up with a proposal regarding finer control of disabling simprocs. -/
set_option simprocs false in
/-- The five lemma. -/
theorem isIso_of_epi_of_isIso_of_isIso_of_mono (h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : IsIso (app' φ 1))
(h₂ : IsIso (app' φ 3)) (h₃ : Mono (app' φ 4)) : IsIso (app' φ 2) := by
dsimp at h₀ h₁ h₂ h₃
have : Mono (app' φ 2) := by
apply mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono (δlastFunctor.map φ) (R₁.exact_iff_δlast.1 hR₁).1
(R₂.exact_iff_δlast.1 hR₂).1 <;> dsimp <;> infer_instance
have : Epi (app' φ 2) := by
apply epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono (δ₀Functor.map φ) (R₁.exact_iff_δ₀.1 hR₁).2
(R₂.exact_iff_δ₀.1 hR₂).2 <;> dsimp <;> infer_instance
apply isIso_of_mono_of_epi
#align category_theory.abelian.is_iso_of_is_iso_of_is_iso_of_is_iso_of_is_iso CategoryTheory.Abelian.isIso_of_epi_of_isIso_of_isIso_of_mono
end Five
/-! The following "three lemmas" for morphisms in `ComposableArrows C 2` are
special cases of "four lemmas" applied to diagrams where some of the
leftmost or rightmost maps (or objects) are zero. -/
section Three
variable {R₁ R₂ : ComposableArrows C 2} (φ : R₁ ⟶ R₂)
attribute [local simp] Precomp.map
theorem mono_of_epi_of_epi_mono' (hR₁ : R₁.map' 0 2 = 0) (hR₁' : Epi (R₁.map' 1 2))
(hR₂ : R₂.Exact) (h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 1)) :
Mono (app' φ 2) := by
let ψ : mk₃ (R₁.map' 0 1) (R₁.map' 1 2) (0 : _ ⟶ R₁.obj' 0) ⟶
mk₃ (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2) (0 : _ ⟶ R₁.obj' 0) := homMk₃ (app' φ 0) (app' φ 1)
(app' φ 2) (𝟙 _) (naturality' φ 0 1) (naturality' φ 1 2) (by simp)
refine mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono' ψ ?_ (exact₂_mk _ (by simp) ?_)
(hR₂.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows h₀ h₁ (by dsimp [ψ]; infer_instance)
· dsimp
rw [← Functor.map_comp]
exact hR₁
· rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_epi _ (by simp)]
exact hR₁'
theorem mono_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.Exact)
(hR₁' : Epi (R₁.map' 1 2)) (h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 1)) :
Mono (app' φ 2) :=
mono_of_epi_of_epi_mono' φ (by simpa only [map'_comp R₁ 0 1 2] using hR₁.toIsComplex.zero 0)
hR₁' hR₂ h₀ h₁
theorem epi_of_mono_of_epi_of_mono' (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.map' 0 2 = 0)
(hR₂' : Mono (R₂.map' 0 1)) (h₀ : Epi (app' φ 1)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 2)) :
Epi (app' φ 0) := by
let ψ : mk₃ (0 : R₁.obj' 0 ⟶ _) (R₁.map' 0 1) (R₁.map' 1 2) ⟶
mk₃ (0 : R₁.obj' 0 ⟶ _) (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2) := homMk₃ (𝟙 _) (app' φ 0) (app' φ 1)
(app' φ 2) (by simp) (naturality' φ 0 1) (naturality' φ 1 2)
refine epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono' ψ (hR₁.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows
(exact₂_mk _ (by simp) ?_) ?_ (by dsimp [ψ]; infer_instance) h₀ h₁
· rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_mono _ (by simp)]
exact hR₂'
· dsimp
rw [← Functor.map_comp]
exact hR₂
theorem epi_of_mono_of_epi_of_mono (hR₁ : R₁.Exact) (hR₂ : R₂.Exact)
(hR₂' : Mono (R₂.map' 0 1)) (h₀ : Epi (app' φ 1)) (h₁ : Mono (app' φ 2)) :
Epi (app' φ 0) :=
epi_of_mono_of_epi_of_mono' φ hR₁
(by simpa only [map'_comp R₂ 0 1 2] using hR₂.toIsComplex.zero 0) hR₂' h₀ h₁
theorem mono_of_mono_of_mono_of_mono (hR₁ : R₁.Exact)
(hR₂' : Mono (R₂.map' 0 1))
(h₀ : Mono (app' φ 0))
(h₁ : Mono (app' φ 2)) :
Mono (app' φ 1) := by
let ψ : mk₃ (0 : R₁.obj' 0 ⟶ _) (R₁.map' 0 1) (R₁.map' 1 2) ⟶
mk₃ (0 : R₁.obj' 0 ⟶ _) (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2) := homMk₃ (𝟙 _) (app' φ 0) (app' φ 1)
(app' φ 2) (by simp) (naturality' φ 0 1) (naturality' φ 1 2)
refine mono_of_epi_of_mono_of_mono' ψ (by simp)
(hR₁.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows
(exact₂_mk _ (by simp) ?_) (by dsimp [ψ]; infer_instance) h₀ h₁
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_mono _ (by simp)]
exact hR₂'
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/DiagramLemmas/Four.lean | 221 | 231 | theorem epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_epi (hR₂ : R₂.Exact) (hR₁' : Epi (R₁.map' 1 2))
(h₀ : Epi (app' φ 0)) (h₁ : Epi (app' φ 2)) :
Epi (app' φ 1) := by |
let ψ : mk₃ (R₁.map' 0 1) (R₁.map' 1 2) (0 : _ ⟶ R₁.obj' 0) ⟶
mk₃ (R₂.map' 0 1) (R₂.map' 1 2) (0 : _ ⟶ R₁.obj' 0) := homMk₃ (app' φ 0) (app' φ 1)
(app' φ 2) (𝟙 _) (naturality' φ 0 1) (naturality' φ 1 2) (by simp)
refine epi_of_epi_of_epi_of_mono' ψ (exact₂_mk _ (by simp) ?_)
(hR₂.exact 0).exact_toComposableArrows (by simp)
h₀ h₁ (by dsimp [ψ]; infer_instance)
rw [ShortComplex.exact_iff_epi _ (by simp)]
exact hR₁'
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sheaf
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.CoverLifting
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Adjunction.FullyFaithful
#align_import category_theory.sites.dense_subsite from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"1d650c2e131f500f3c17f33b4d19d2ea15987f2c"
/-!
# Dense subsites
We define `IsCoverDense` functors into sites as functors such that there exists a covering sieve
that factors through images of the functor for each object in `D`.
We will primarily consider cover-dense functors that are also full, since this notion is in general
not well-behaved otherwise. Note that https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/dense+sub-site indeed has a
weaker notion of cover-dense that loosens this requirement, but it would not have all the properties
we would need, and some sheafification would be needed for here and there.
## Main results
- `CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.presheafHom`: If `G : C ⥤ (D, K)` is full
and cover-dense, then given any presheaf `ℱ` and sheaf `ℱ'` on `D`,
and a morphism `α : G ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G ⋙ ℱ'`, we may glue them together to obtain
a morphism of presheaves `ℱ ⟶ ℱ'`.
- `CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafIso`: If `ℱ` above is a sheaf and `α` is an iso,
then the result is also an iso.
- `CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.iso_of_restrict_iso`: If `G : C ⥤ (D, K)` is full
and cover-dense, then given any sheaves `ℱ, ℱ'` on `D`, and a morphism `α : ℱ ⟶ ℱ'`,
then `α` is an iso if `G ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G ⋙ ℱ'` is iso.
- `CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafEquivOfCoverPreservingCoverLifting`:
If `G : (C, J) ⥤ (D, K)` is fully-faithful, cover-lifting, cover-preserving, and cover-dense,
then it will induce an equivalence of categories of sheaves valued in a complete category.
## References
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, ℱ. T. Johnstone: C2.2.
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/dense+sub-site
* https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/comparison+lemma
-/
universe w v u
namespace CategoryTheory
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D] {E : Type*} [Category E]
variable (J : GrothendieckTopology C) (K : GrothendieckTopology D)
variable {L : GrothendieckTopology E}
/-- An auxiliary structure that witnesses the fact that `f` factors through an image object of `G`.
-/
-- Porting note(#5171): removed `@[nolint has_nonempty_instance]`
structure Presieve.CoverByImageStructure (G : C ⥤ D) {V U : D} (f : V ⟶ U) where
obj : C
lift : V ⟶ G.obj obj
map : G.obj obj ⟶ U
fac : lift ≫ map = f := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.presieve.cover_by_image_structure CategoryTheory.Presieve.CoverByImageStructure
attribute [nolint docBlame] Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.obj Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.lift
Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.map Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.fac
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.fac
/-- For a functor `G : C ⥤ D`, and an object `U : D`, `Presieve.coverByImage G U` is the presieve
of `U` consisting of those arrows that factor through images of `G`.
-/
def Presieve.coverByImage (G : C ⥤ D) (U : D) : Presieve U := fun _ f =>
Nonempty (Presieve.CoverByImageStructure G f)
#align category_theory.presieve.cover_by_image CategoryTheory.Presieve.coverByImage
/-- For a functor `G : C ⥤ D`, and an object `U : D`, `Sieve.coverByImage G U` is the sieve of `U`
consisting of those arrows that factor through images of `G`.
-/
def Sieve.coverByImage (G : C ⥤ D) (U : D) : Sieve U :=
⟨Presieve.coverByImage G U, fun ⟨⟨Z, f₁, f₂, (e : _ = _)⟩⟩ g =>
⟨⟨Z, g ≫ f₁, f₂, show (g ≫ f₁) ≫ f₂ = g ≫ _ by rw [Category.assoc, ← e]⟩⟩⟩
#align category_theory.sieve.cover_by_image CategoryTheory.Sieve.coverByImage
theorem Presieve.in_coverByImage (G : C ⥤ D) {X : D} {Y : C} (f : G.obj Y ⟶ X) :
Presieve.coverByImage G X f :=
⟨⟨Y, 𝟙 _, f, by simp⟩⟩
#align category_theory.presieve.in_cover_by_image CategoryTheory.Presieve.in_coverByImage
/-- A functor `G : (C, J) ⥤ (D, K)` is cover dense if for each object in `D`,
there exists a covering sieve in `D` that factors through images of `G`.
This definition can be found in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/dense+sub-site Definition 2.2.
-/
class Functor.IsCoverDense (G : C ⥤ D) (K : GrothendieckTopology D) : Prop where
is_cover : ∀ U : D, Sieve.coverByImage G U ∈ K U
#align category_theory.cover_dense CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense
lemma Functor.is_cover_of_isCoverDense (G : C ⥤ D) (K : GrothendieckTopology D)
[G.IsCoverDense K] (U : D) : Sieve.coverByImage G U ∈ K U := by
apply Functor.IsCoverDense.is_cover
lemma Functor.isCoverDense_of_generate_singleton_functor_π_mem (G : C ⥤ D)
(K : GrothendieckTopology D)
(h : ∀ B, ∃ (X : C) (f : G.obj X ⟶ B), Sieve.generate (Presieve.singleton f) ∈ K B) :
G.IsCoverDense K where
is_cover B := by
obtain ⟨X, f, h⟩ := h B
refine K.superset_covering ?_ h
intro Y f ⟨Z, g, _, h, w⟩
cases h
exact ⟨⟨_, g, _, w⟩⟩
attribute [nolint docBlame] CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.is_cover
open Presieve Opposite
namespace Functor
namespace IsCoverDense
variable {K}
variable {A : Type*} [Category A] (G : C ⥤ D) [G.IsCoverDense K]
-- this is not marked with `@[ext]` because `H` can not be inferred from the type
theorem ext (ℱ : SheafOfTypes K) (X : D) {s t : ℱ.val.obj (op X)}
(h : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : G.obj Y ⟶ X), ℱ.val.map f.op s = ℱ.val.map f.op t) : s = t := by
apply (ℱ.cond (Sieve.coverByImage G X) (G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense K X)).isSeparatedFor.ext
rintro Y _ ⟨Z, f₁, f₂, ⟨rfl⟩⟩
simp [h f₂]
#align category_theory.cover_dense.ext CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.ext
variable {G}
theorem functorPullback_pushforward_covering [Full G] {X : C}
(T : K (G.obj X)) : (T.val.functorPullback G).functorPushforward G ∈ K (G.obj X) := by
refine K.superset_covering ?_ (K.bind_covering T.property
fun Y f _ => G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense K Y)
rintro Y _ ⟨Z, _, f, hf, ⟨W, g, f', ⟨rfl⟩⟩, rfl⟩
use W; use G.preimage (f' ≫ f); use g
constructor
· simpa using T.val.downward_closed hf f'
· simp
#align category_theory.cover_dense.functor_pullback_pushforward_covering CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.functorPullback_pushforward_covering
/-- (Implementation). Given a hom between the pullbacks of two sheaves, we can whisker it with
`coyoneda` to obtain a hom between the pullbacks of the sheaves of maps from `X`.
-/
@[simps!]
def homOver {ℱ : Dᵒᵖ ⥤ A} {ℱ' : Sheaf K A} (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) (X : A) :
G.op ⋙ ℱ ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op X) ⟶ G.op ⋙ (sheafOver ℱ' X).val :=
whiskerRight α (coyoneda.obj (op X))
#align category_theory.cover_dense.hom_over CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.homOver
/-- (Implementation). Given an iso between the pullbacks of two sheaves, we can whisker it with
`coyoneda` to obtain an iso between the pullbacks of the sheaves of maps from `X`.
-/
@[simps!]
def isoOver {ℱ ℱ' : Sheaf K A} (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) (X : A) :
G.op ⋙ (sheafOver ℱ X).val ≅ G.op ⋙ (sheafOver ℱ' X).val :=
isoWhiskerRight α (coyoneda.obj (op X))
#align category_theory.cover_dense.iso_over CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.isoOver
theorem sheaf_eq_amalgamation (ℱ : Sheaf K A) {X : A} {U : D} {T : Sieve U} (hT)
(x : FamilyOfElements _ T) (hx) (t) (h : x.IsAmalgamation t) :
t = (ℱ.cond X T hT).amalgamate x hx :=
(ℱ.cond X T hT).isSeparatedFor x t _ h ((ℱ.cond X T hT).isAmalgamation hx)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.sheaf_eq_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheaf_eq_amalgamation
variable [Full G]
namespace Types
variable {ℱ : Dᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v} {ℱ' : SheafOfTypes.{v} K} (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val)
/--
(Implementation). Given a section of `ℱ` on `X`, we can obtain a family of elements valued in `ℱ'`
that is defined on a cover generated by the images of `G`. -/
-- Porting note: removed `@[simp, nolint unused_arguments]`
noncomputable def pushforwardFamily {X} (x : ℱ.obj (op X)) :
FamilyOfElements ℱ'.val (coverByImage G X) := fun _ _ hf =>
ℱ'.val.map hf.some.lift.op <| α.app (op _) (ℱ.map hf.some.map.op x : _)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.pushforward_family CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.pushforwardFamily
-- Porting note: there are various `include` and `omit`s in this file (e.g. one is removed here),
-- none of which are needed in Lean 4.
-- Porting note: `pushforward_family` was tagged `@[simp]` in Lean 3 so we add the
-- equation lemma
@[simp] theorem pushforwardFamily_def {X} (x : ℱ.obj (op X)) :
pushforwardFamily α x = fun _ _ hf =>
ℱ'.val.map hf.some.lift.op <| α.app (op _) (ℱ.map hf.some.map.op x : _) := rfl
/-- (Implementation). The `pushforwardFamily` defined is compatible. -/
theorem pushforwardFamily_compatible {X} (x : ℱ.obj (op X)) :
(pushforwardFamily α x).Compatible := by
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ e
apply IsCoverDense.ext G
intro Y f
simp only [pushforwardFamily, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp]
change (ℱ.map _ ≫ α.app (op _) ≫ ℱ'.val.map _) _ = (ℱ.map _ ≫ α.app (op _) ≫ ℱ'.val.map _) _
rw [← G.map_preimage (f ≫ g₁ ≫ _)]
rw [← G.map_preimage (f ≫ g₂ ≫ _)]
erw [← α.naturality (G.preimage _).op]
erw [← α.naturality (G.preimage _).op]
refine congr_fun ?_ x
simp only [Functor.comp_map, ← Category.assoc, Functor.op_map, Quiver.Hom.unop_op,
← ℱ.map_comp, ← op_comp, G.map_preimage]
congr 3
simp [e]
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.pushforward_family_compatible CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.pushforwardFamily_compatible
/-- (Implementation). The morphism `ℱ(X) ⟶ ℱ'(X)` given by gluing the `pushforwardFamily`. -/
noncomputable def appHom (X : D) : ℱ.obj (op X) ⟶ ℱ'.val.obj (op X) := fun x =>
(ℱ'.cond _ (G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense _ X)).amalgamate (pushforwardFamily α x)
(pushforwardFamily_compatible α x)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.app_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.appHom
@[simp]
theorem pushforwardFamily_apply {X} (x : ℱ.obj (op X)) {Y : C} (f : G.obj Y ⟶ X) :
pushforwardFamily α x f (Presieve.in_coverByImage G f) = α.app (op Y) (ℱ.map f.op x) := by
unfold pushforwardFamily
-- Porting note: congr_fun was more powerful in Lean 3; I had to explicitly supply
-- the type of the first input here even though it's obvious (there is a unique occurrence
-- of x on each side of the equality)
refine congr_fun (?_ :
(fun t => ℱ'.val.map ((Nonempty.some (_ : coverByImage G X f)).lift.op)
(α.app (op (Nonempty.some (_ : coverByImage G X f)).1)
(ℱ.map ((Nonempty.some (_ : coverByImage G X f)).map.op) t))) =
(fun t => α.app (op Y) (ℱ.map (f.op) t))) x
rw [← G.map_preimage (Nonempty.some _ : Presieve.CoverByImageStructure _ _).lift]
change ℱ.map _ ≫ α.app (op _) ≫ ℱ'.val.map _ = ℱ.map f.op ≫ α.app (op Y)
erw [← α.naturality (G.preimage _).op]
simp only [← Functor.map_comp, ← Category.assoc, Functor.comp_map, G.map_preimage, G.op_map,
Quiver.Hom.unop_op, ← op_comp, Presieve.CoverByImageStructure.fac]
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.pushforward_family_apply CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.pushforwardFamily_apply
@[simp]
theorem appHom_restrict {X : D} {Y : C} (f : op X ⟶ op (G.obj Y)) (x) :
ℱ'.val.map f (appHom α X x) = α.app (op Y) (ℱ.map f x) :=
((ℱ'.cond _ (G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense _ X)).valid_glue
(pushforwardFamily_compatible α x) f.unop
(Presieve.in_coverByImage G f.unop)).trans (pushforwardFamily_apply _ _ _)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.app_hom_restrict CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.appHom_restrict
@[simp]
theorem appHom_valid_glue {X : D} {Y : C} (f : op X ⟶ op (G.obj Y)) :
appHom α X ≫ ℱ'.val.map f = ℱ.map f ≫ α.app (op Y) := by
ext
apply appHom_restrict
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.app_hom_valid_glue CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.appHom_valid_glue
/--
(Implementation). The maps given in `appIso` is inverse to each other and gives a `ℱ(X) ≅ ℱ'(X)`.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def appIso {ℱ ℱ' : SheafOfTypes.{v} K} (i : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val)
(X : D) : ℱ.val.obj (op X) ≅ ℱ'.val.obj (op X) where
hom := appHom i.hom X
inv := appHom i.inv X
hom_inv_id := by
ext x
apply Functor.IsCoverDense.ext G
intro Y f
simp
inv_hom_id := by
ext x
apply Functor.IsCoverDense.ext G
intro Y f
simp
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.app_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.appIso
/-- Given a natural transformation `G ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of types, where `G` is
full and cover-dense, and `ℱ'` is a sheaf, we may obtain a natural transformation between sheaves.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def presheafHom (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) : ℱ ⟶ ℱ'.val where
app X := appHom α (unop X)
naturality X Y f := by
ext x
apply Functor.IsCoverDense.ext G
intro Y' f'
simp only [appHom_restrict, types_comp_apply, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]
-- Porting note: Lean 3 proof continued with a rewrite but we're done here
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.presheaf_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.presheafHom
/-- Given a natural isomorphism `G ⋙ ℱ ≅ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of types, where `G` is full
and cover-dense, and `ℱ, ℱ'` are sheaves, we may obtain a natural isomorphism between presheaves.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def presheafIso {ℱ ℱ' : SheafOfTypes.{v} K} (i : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
ℱ.val ≅ ℱ'.val :=
NatIso.ofComponents (fun X => appIso i (unop X)) @(presheafHom i.hom).naturality
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.presheaf_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.presheafIso
/-- Given a natural isomorphism `G ⋙ ℱ ≅ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of types, where `G` is full
and cover-dense, and `ℱ, ℱ'` are sheaves, we may obtain a natural isomorphism between sheaves.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def sheafIso {ℱ ℱ' : SheafOfTypes.{v} K} (i : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
ℱ ≅ ℱ' where
hom := ⟨(presheafIso i).hom⟩
inv := ⟨(presheafIso i).inv⟩
hom_inv_id := by
ext1
apply (presheafIso i).hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := by
ext1
apply (presheafIso i).inv_hom_id
#align category_theory.cover_dense.types.sheaf_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.Types.sheafIso
end Types
open Types
variable {ℱ : Dᵒᵖ ⥤ A} {ℱ' : Sheaf K A}
/-- (Implementation). The sheaf map given in `types.sheaf_hom` is natural in terms of `X`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def sheafCoyonedaHom (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
coyoneda ⋙ (whiskeringLeft Dᵒᵖ A (Type _)).obj ℱ ⟶
coyoneda ⋙ (whiskeringLeft Dᵒᵖ A (Type _)).obj ℱ'.val where
app X := presheafHom (homOver α (unop X))
naturality X Y f := by
ext U x
change
appHom (homOver α (unop Y)) (unop U) (f.unop ≫ x) =
f.unop ≫ appHom (homOver α (unop X)) (unop U) x
symm
apply sheaf_eq_amalgamation
· apply G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense
-- Porting note: the following line closes a goal which didn't exist before reenableeta
· exact pushforwardFamily_compatible (homOver α Y.unop) (f.unop ≫ x)
intro Y' f' hf'
change unop X ⟶ ℱ.obj (op (unop _)) at x
dsimp
simp only [pushforwardFamily, Functor.comp_map, coyoneda_obj_map, homOver_app, Category.assoc]
congr 1
conv_lhs => rw [← hf'.some.fac]
simp only [← Category.assoc, op_comp, Functor.map_comp]
congr 1
exact (appHom_restrict (homOver α (unop X)) hf'.some.map.op x).trans (by simp)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.sheaf_coyoneda_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafCoyonedaHom
/--
(Implementation). `sheafCoyonedaHom` but the order of the arguments of the functor are swapped.
-/
noncomputable def sheafYonedaHom (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
ℱ ⋙ yoneda ⟶ ℱ'.val ⋙ yoneda where
app U :=
let α := (sheafCoyonedaHom α)
{ app := fun X => (α.app X).app U
naturality := fun X Y f => by simpa using congr_app (α.naturality f) U }
naturality U V i := by
ext X x
exact congr_fun (((sheafCoyonedaHom α).app X).naturality i) x
#align category_theory.cover_dense.sheaf_yoneda_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafYonedaHom
/-- Given a natural transformation `G ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of arbitrary category,
where `G` is full and cover-dense, and `ℱ'` is a sheaf, we may obtain a natural transformation
between presheaves.
-/
noncomputable def sheafHom (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) : ℱ ⟶ ℱ'.val :=
let α' := sheafYonedaHom α
{ app := fun X => yoneda.preimage (α'.app X)
naturality := fun X Y f => yoneda.map_injective (by simpa using α'.naturality f) }
#align category_theory.cover_dense.sheaf_hom CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafHom
/-- Given a natural isomorphism `G ⋙ ℱ ≅ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of arbitrary category,
where `G` is full and cover-dense, and `ℱ', ℱ` are sheaves,
we may obtain a natural isomorphism between presheaves.
-/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def presheafIso {ℱ ℱ' : Sheaf K A} (i : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
ℱ.val ≅ ℱ'.val := by
have : ∀ X : Dᵒᵖ, IsIso ((sheafHom i.hom).app X) := by
intro X
-- Porting note: somehow `apply` in Lean 3 is leaving a typeclass goal,
-- perhaps due to elaboration order. The corresponding `apply` in Lean 4 fails
-- because the instance can't yet be synthesized. I hence reorder the proof.
suffices IsIso (yoneda.map ((sheafHom i.hom).app X)) by
apply isIso_of_reflects_iso _ yoneda
use (sheafYonedaHom i.inv).app X
constructor <;> ext x : 2 <;>
simp only [sheafHom, NatTrans.comp_app, NatTrans.id_app, Functor.map_preimage]
· exact ((Types.presheafIso (isoOver i (unop x))).app X).hom_inv_id
· exact ((Types.presheafIso (isoOver i (unop x))).app X).inv_hom_id
-- Porting note: Lean 4 proof is finished, Lean 3 needed `inferInstance`
haveI : IsIso (sheafHom i.hom) := by apply NatIso.isIso_of_isIso_app
apply asIso (sheafHom i.hom)
#align category_theory.cover_dense.presheaf_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.presheafIso
/-- Given a natural isomorphism `G ⋙ ℱ ≅ G ⋙ ℱ'` between presheaves of arbitrary category,
where `G` is full and cover-dense, and `ℱ', ℱ` are sheaves,
we may obtain a natural isomorphism between presheaves.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def sheafIso {ℱ ℱ' : Sheaf K A} (i : G.op ⋙ ℱ.val ≅ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) : ℱ ≅ ℱ' where
hom := ⟨(presheafIso i).hom⟩
inv := ⟨(presheafIso i).inv⟩
hom_inv_id := by
ext1
apply (presheafIso i).hom_inv_id
inv_hom_id := by
ext1
apply (presheafIso i).inv_hom_id
#align category_theory.cover_dense.sheaf_iso CategoryTheory.Functor.IsCoverDense.sheafIso
/-- The constructed `sheafHom α` is equal to `α` when restricted onto `C`.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/DenseSubsite.lean | 409 | 430 | theorem sheafHom_restrict_eq (α : G.op ⋙ ℱ ⟶ G.op ⋙ ℱ'.val) :
whiskerLeft G.op (sheafHom α) = α := by |
ext X
apply yoneda.map_injective
ext U
-- Porting note: didn't need to provide the input to `map_preimage` in Lean 3
erw [yoneda.map_preimage ((sheafYonedaHom α).app (G.op.obj X))]
symm
change (show (ℱ'.val ⋙ coyoneda.obj (op (unop U))).obj (op (G.obj (unop X))) from _) = _
apply sheaf_eq_amalgamation ℱ' (G.is_cover_of_isCoverDense _ _)
-- Porting note: next line was not needed in mathlib3
· exact (pushforwardFamily_compatible _ _)
intro Y f hf
conv_lhs => rw [← hf.some.fac]
simp only [pushforwardFamily, Functor.comp_map, yoneda_map_app, coyoneda_obj_map, op_comp,
FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, homOver_app, ← Category.assoc]
congr 1
simp only [Category.assoc]
congr 1
rw [← G.map_preimage hf.some.map]
symm
apply α.naturality (G.preimage hf.some.map).op
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.HasLimits
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Currying
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Bifunctor
#align_import category_theory.limits.fubini from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"59382264386afdbaf1727e617f5fdda511992eb9"
/-!
# A Fubini theorem for categorical (co)limits
We prove that $lim_{J × K} G = lim_J (lim_K G(j, -))$ for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
when all the appropriate limits exist.
We begin working with a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`. We'll write `G : J × K ⥤ C` for the associated
"uncurried" functor.
In the first part, given a coherent family `D` of limit cones over the functors `F.obj j`,
and a cone `c` over `G`, we construct a cone over the cone points of `D`.
We then show that if `c` is a limit cone, the constructed cone is also a limit cone.
In the second part, we state the Fubini theorem in the setting where limits are
provided by suitable `HasLimit` classes.
We construct
`limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim)`
and give simp lemmas characterising it.
For convenience, we also provide
`limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G : limit G ≅ limit ((curry.obj G) ⋙ lim)`
in terms of the uncurried functor.
All statements have their counterpart for colimits.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {J K : Type v} [SmallCategory J] [SmallCategory K]
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable (F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C)
-- We could try introducing a "dependent functor type" to handle this?
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCones where
/-- For each object, a cone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (Cones.postcompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j) ⟶ obj j'
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones
/-- A structure carrying a diagram of cocones over the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
structure DiagramOfCocones where
/-- For each object, a cocone. -/
obj : ∀ j : J, Cocone (F.obj j)
/-- For each map, a map of cocones. -/
map : ∀ {j j' : J} (f : j ⟶ j'), (obj j) ⟶ (Cocones.precompose (F.map f)).obj (obj j')
id : ∀ j : J, (map (𝟙 j)).hom = 𝟙 _ := by aesop_cat
comp : ∀ {j₁ j₂ j₃ : J} (f : j₁ ⟶ j₂) (g : j₂ ⟶ j₃),
(map (f ≫ g)).hom = (map f).hom ≫ (map g).hom := by aesop_cat
variable {F}
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCones.conePoints (D : DiagramOfCones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.conePoints
/-- Extract the functor `J ⥤ C` consisting of the cocone points and the maps between them,
from a `DiagramOfCocones`.
-/
@[simps]
def DiagramOfCocones.coconePoints (D : DiagramOfCocones F) : J ⥤ C where
obj j := (D.obj j).pt
map f := (D.map f).hom
map_id j := D.id j
map_comp f g := D.comp f g
/-- Given a diagram `D` of limit cones over the `F.obj j`, and a cone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cone over the diagram consisting of the cone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coneOfConeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cone D.conePoints where
pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).lift
{ pt := c.pt
π :=
{ app := fun k => c.π.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j, k') (𝟙 j, f)
dsimp at this
simp? at this says
simp only [Category.id_comp, Functor.map_id, NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j').hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.ConeMorphism.w, Limits.Cones.postcompose_obj_π,
Limits.IsLimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsLimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.id_comp,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.π (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurry
/-- Given a diagram `D` of colimit cocones over the `F.obj j`, and a cocone over `uncurry.obj F`,
we can construct a cocone over the diagram consisting of the cocone points from `D`.
-/
@[simps]
def coconeOfCoconeUncurry {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
(c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)) : Cocone D.coconePoints where
pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun j =>
(Q j).desc
{ pt := c.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun k => c.ι.app (j, k)
naturality := fun k k' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.comp_id]
conv_lhs =>
arg 1; equals (F.map (𝟙 _)).app _ ≫ (F.obj j).map f =>
simp;
conv_lhs => arg 1; rw [← uncurry_obj_map F ((𝟙 j,f) : (j,k) ⟶ (j,k'))]
rw [c.w] } }
naturality := fun j j' f =>
(Q j).hom_ext
(by
dsimp
intro k
simp only [Limits.CoconeMorphism.w_assoc, Limits.Cocones.precompose_obj_ι,
Limits.IsColimit.fac_assoc, Limits.IsColimit.fac, NatTrans.comp_app, Category.comp_id,
Category.assoc]
have := @NatTrans.naturality _ _ _ _ _ _ c.ι (j, k) (j', k) (f, 𝟙 k)
dsimp at this
simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.comp_id, CategoryTheory.Functor.map_id,
NatTrans.id_app] at this
exact this) }
/-- `coneOfConeUncurry Q c` is a limit cone when `c` is a limit cone.
-/
def coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit {D : DiagramOfCones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsLimit c) : IsLimit (coneOfConeUncurry Q c) where
lift s :=
P.lift
{ pt := s.pt
π :=
{ app := fun p => s.π.app p.1 ≫ (D.obj p.1).π.app p.2
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_rhs 3 4 => rw [← NatTrans.naturality]
slice_rhs 2 3 => rw [← (D.obj j).π.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k'
dsimp at w
rw [← w]
have n := s.π.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.id_comp] at n
rw [n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
π := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.cone_of_cone_uncurry_is_limit CategoryTheory.Limits.coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit
/-- `coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c` is a colimit cocone when `c` is a colimit cocone.
-/
def coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit {D : DiagramOfCocones F} (Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (D.obj j))
{c : Cocone (uncurry.obj F)} (P : IsColimit c) : IsColimit (coconeOfCoconeUncurry Q c) where
desc s :=
P.desc
{ pt := s.pt
ι :=
{ app := fun p => (D.obj p.1).ι.app p.2 ≫ s.ι.app p.1
naturality := fun p p' f => by
dsimp; simp only [Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
rcases p with ⟨j, k⟩
rcases p' with ⟨j', k'⟩
rcases f with ⟨fj, fk⟩
dsimp
slice_lhs 2 3 => rw [(D.obj j').ι.naturality]
simp only [Functor.const_obj_map, Category.id_comp, Category.assoc]
have w := (D.map fj).w k
dsimp at w
slice_lhs 1 2 => rw [← w]
have n := s.ι.naturality fj
dsimp at n
simp only [Category.comp_id] at n
rw [← n]
simp } }
fac s j := by
apply (Q j).hom_ext
intro k
simp
uniq s m w := by
refine P.uniq
{ pt := s.pt
ι := _ } m ?_
rintro ⟨j, k⟩
dsimp
rw [← w j]
simp
section
variable (F)
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed limits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the limit cone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits : DiagramOfCones F where
obj j := limit.cone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := lim.map (F.map f) }
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfConesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F⟩
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones_inhabited CategoryTheory.Limits.diagramOfConesInhabited
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints :
(DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F).conePoints = F ⋙ lim :=
rfl
#align category_theory.limits.diagram_of_cones.mk_of_has_limits_cone_points CategoryTheory.Limits.DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits_conePoints
variable [HasLimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasLimit (F ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim : limit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) := by
let c := limit.cone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsLimit c := limit.isLimit _
let G := DiagramOfCones.mkOfHasLimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsLimit (G.obj j) := fun j => limit.isLimit _
have Q' := coneOfConeUncurryIsLimit Q P
have Q'' := limit.isLimit (F ⋙ lim)
exact IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
dsimp [limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim, IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso, IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim F).hom]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_uncurry_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π
end
section
variable (F)
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
/-- Given a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`, with all needed colimits,
we can construct a diagram consisting of the colimit cocone over each functor `F.obj j`,
and the universal cocone morphisms between these.
-/
@[simps]
noncomputable def DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits : DiagramOfCocones F where
obj j := colimit.cocone (F.obj j)
map f := { hom := colim.map (F.map f) }
-- Satisfying the inhabited linter.
noncomputable instance diagramOfCoconesInhabited : Inhabited (DiagramOfCocones F) :=
⟨DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F⟩
@[simp]
theorem DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits_coconePoints :
(DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F).coconePoints = F ⋙ colim :=
rfl
variable [HasColimit (uncurry.obj F)]
variable [HasColimit (F ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `F : J ⥤ K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `uncurry.obj F` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `F.obj j`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (uncurry.obj F) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) := by
let c := colimit.cocone (uncurry.obj F)
let P : IsColimit c := colimit.isColimit _
let G := DiagramOfCocones.mkOfHasColimits F
let Q : ∀ j, IsColimit (G.obj j) := fun j => colimit.isColimit _
have Q' := coconeOfCoconeUncurryIsColimit Q P
have Q'' := colimit.isColimit (F ⋙ colim)
exact IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso Q' Q''
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_inv {j} {k} :
colimit.ι (F.obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv =
colimit.ι (uncurry.obj F) (j, k) := by
dsimp [colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim, IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso,
IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso]
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ (j, k) ≫ (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ (colimit (F ⋙ colim))) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim F).inv]
simp
end
section
variable (F) [HasLimitsOfShape J C] [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
-- With only moderate effort these could be derived if needed:
variable [HasLimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasLimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The limit of `F.flip ⋙ lim` is isomorphic to the limit of `F ⋙ lim`. -/
noncomputable def limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim : limit (F.flip ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (F ⋙ lim) :=
(limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _).symm ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim _
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π (j) (k) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k =
(limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
-- See note [dsimp, simp]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π (k) (j) :
(limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim F).inv ≫ limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
dsimp [limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_flip_comp_lim_iso_limit_comp_lim_inv_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitFlipCompLimIsoLimitCompLim_inv_π_π
end
section
variable (F) [HasColimitsOfShape J C] [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasColimitsOfShape (J × K) C] [HasColimitsOfShape (K × J) C]
/-- The colimit of `F.flip ⋙ colim` is isomorphic to the colimit of `F ⋙ colim`. -/
noncomputable def colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim :
colimit (F.flip ⋙ colim) ≅ colimit (F ⋙ colim) :=
(colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _).symm ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfNatIso (uncurryObjFlip _) ≪≫
HasColimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding _ _)
(NatIso.ofComponents fun _ => by rfl) ≪≫
colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim _
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_hom (j) (k) :
colimit.ι (F.flip.obj k) j ≫ colimit.ι (F.flip ⋙ colim) k ≫
(colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim F).hom =
(colimit.ι _ k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (F⋙ colim)) := by
dsimp [colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim_ι_ι_inv (k) (j) :
colimit.ι (F.obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (F ⋙ colim) j ≫
(colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim F).inv =
(colimit.ι _ j ≫ colimit.ι (F.flip ⋙ colim) k : _ ⟶ colimit (F.flip ⋙ colim)) := by
dsimp [colimitFlipCompColimIsoColimitCompColim]
slice_lhs 1 3 => simp only []
simp
end
variable (G : J × K ⥤ C)
section
variable [HasLimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasLimit G]
variable [HasLimit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that the limit of `G` can be computed as
the limit of the limits of the functors `G.obj (j, _)`.
-/
noncomputable def limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim : limit G ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) := by
have i : G ≅ uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G) := currying.symm.unitIso.app G
haveI : Limits.HasLimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)) := hasLimitOfIso i
trans limit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G))
· apply HasLimit.isoOfNatIso i
· exact limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k = limit.π _ (j, k) := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim, Trans.simple, HasLimit.isoOfNatIso, limitUncurryIsoLimitCompLim]
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_hom_π_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π {j} {k} :
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).inv ≫ limit.π _ (j, k) =
(limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by
rw [← cancel_epi (limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom]
simp
#align category_theory.limits.limit_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim_inv_π CategoryTheory.Limits.limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_inv_π
end
section
variable [HasColimitsOfShape K C]
variable [HasColimit G]
variable [HasColimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim)]
/-- The Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that the colimit of `G` can be computed as
the colimit of the colimits of the functors `G.obj (j, _)`.
-/
noncomputable def colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim : colimit G ≅ colimit (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) := by
have i : G ≅ uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G) := currying.symm.unitIso.app G
haveI : Limits.HasColimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)) := hasColimitOfIso i.symm
trans colimit (uncurry.obj ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G))
· apply HasColimit.isoOfNatIso i
· exact colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim ((@curry J _ K _ C _).obj G)
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim_ι_ι_inv {j} {k} :
colimit.ι ((curry.obj G).obj j) k ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) j ≫
(colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).inv = colimit.ι _ (j, k) := by
set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in
simp [colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim, Trans.simple, HasColimit.isoOfNatIso,
colimitUncurryIsoColimitCompColim]
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim_ι_hom {j} {k} :
colimit.ι _ (j, k) ≫ (colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).hom =
(colimit.ι (_) k ≫ colimit.ι (curry.obj G ⋙ colim) j : _ ⟶ colimit (_ ⋙ colim)) := by
rw [← cancel_mono (colimitIsoColimitCurryCompColim G).inv]
simp
end
section
variable [HasLimits C]
-- Certainly one could weaken the hypotheses here.
open CategoryTheory.prod
/-- A variant of the Fubini theorem for a functor `G : J × K ⥤ C`,
showing that $\lim_k \lim_j G(j,k) ≅ \lim_j \lim_k G(j,k)$.
-/
noncomputable def limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim :
limit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) :=
calc
limit (curry.obj (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) ⋙ lim) ≅ limit (Prod.swap K J ⋙ G) :=
(limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim _).symm
_ ≅ limit G := HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence (Prod.braiding K J) (Iso.refl _)
_ ≅ limit (curry.obj G ⋙ lim) := limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim _
#align category_theory.limits.limit_curry_swap_comp_lim_iso_limit_curry_comp_lim CategoryTheory.Limits.limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim
-- Porting note: Added type annotation `limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _`
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Fubini.lean | 526 | 538 | theorem limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π {j} {k} :
(limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim G).hom ≫ limit.π _ j ≫ limit.π _ k =
(limit.π _ k ≫ limit.π _ j : limit (_ ⋙ lim) ⟶ _) := by |
dsimp [limitCurrySwapCompLimIsoLimitCurryCompLim]
simp only [Iso.refl_hom, Prod.braiding_counitIso_hom_app, Limits.HasLimit.isoOfEquivalence_hom_π,
Iso.refl_inv, limitIsoLimitCurryCompLim_hom_π_π, eqToIso_refl, Category.assoc]
erw [NatTrans.id_app]
-- Why can't `simp` do this?
dsimp
-- Porting note: the original proof only had `simp`.
-- However, now `CategoryTheory.Bifunctor.map_id` does not get used by `simp`
rw [CategoryTheory.Bifunctor.map_id]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.InfiniteSum
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.MulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
#align_import analysis.asymptotics.asymptotics from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f2ce6086713c78a7f880485f7917ea547a215982"
/-!
# Asymptotics
We introduce these relations:
* `IsBigOWith c l f g` : "f is big O of g along l with constant c";
* `f =O[l] g` : "f is big O of g along l";
* `f =o[l] g` : "f is little o of g along l".
Here `l` is any filter on the domain of `f` and `g`, which are assumed to be the same. The codomains
of `f` and `g` do not need to be the same; all that is needed that there is a norm associated with
these types, and it is the norm that is compared asymptotically.
The relation `IsBigOWith c` is introduced to factor out common algebraic arguments in the proofs of
similar properties of `IsBigO` and `IsLittleO`. Usually proofs outside of this file should use
`IsBigO` instead.
Often the ranges of `f` and `g` will be the real numbers, in which case the norm is the absolute
value. In general, we have
`f =O[l] g ↔ (fun x ↦ ‖f x‖) =O[l] (fun x ↦ ‖g x‖)`,
and similarly for `IsLittleO`. But our setup allows us to use the notions e.g. with functions
to the integers, rationals, complex numbers, or any normed vector space without mentioning the
norm explicitly.
If `f` and `g` are functions to a normed field like the reals or complex numbers and `g` is always
nonzero, we have
`f =o[l] g ↔ Tendsto (fun x ↦ f x / (g x)) l (𝓝 0)`.
In fact, the right-to-left direction holds without the hypothesis on `g`, and in the other direction
it suffices to assume that `f` is zero wherever `g` is. (This generalization is useful in defining
the Fréchet derivative.)
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped Classical
open Topology Filter NNReal
namespace Asymptotics
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {E : Type*} {F : Type*} {G : Type*} {E' : Type*}
{F' : Type*} {G' : Type*} {E'' : Type*} {F'' : Type*} {G'' : Type*} {E''' : Type*}
{R : Type*} {R' : Type*} {𝕜 : Type*} {𝕜' : Type*}
variable [Norm E] [Norm F] [Norm G]
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup E'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup F'] [SeminormedAddCommGroup G']
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedAddCommGroup G''] [SeminormedRing R]
[SeminormedAddGroup E''']
[SeminormedRing R']
variable [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜']
variable {c c' c₁ c₂ : ℝ} {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G}
variable {f' : α → E'} {g' : α → F'} {k' : α → G'}
variable {f'' : α → E''} {g'' : α → F''} {k'' : α → G''}
variable {l l' : Filter α}
section Defs
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- This version of the Landau notation `IsBigOWith C l f g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on
a type `α` and `l` is a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by `C * ‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded by `C`, modulo division by zero issues that are
avoided by this definition. Probably you want to use `IsBigO` instead of this relation. -/
irreducible_def IsBigOWith (c : ℝ) (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖
#align asymptotics.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigOWith` is irreducible. -/
theorem isBigOWith_iff : IsBigOWith c l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by rw [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_iff Asymptotics.isBigOWith_iff
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.bound, IsBigOWith.of_bound⟩ := isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =O[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by a constant multiple of `‖g‖`.
In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` is eventually bounded, modulo division by zero issues that are avoided
by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsBigO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =O[" l "] " g:100 => IsBigO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. We record it in a lemma as `IsBigO` is
irreducible. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g := by rw [IsBigO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isBigO_iff : f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff Asymptotics.isBigO_iff
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with a positive constant. -/
theorem isBigO_iff' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff] at h
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := h
refine ⟨max c 1, zero_lt_one.trans_le (le_max_right _ _), ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
apply hx.trans
gcongr
exact le_max_left _ _
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff]
obtain ⟨c, ⟨_, hc⟩⟩ := h
exact ⟨c, hc⟩
/-- Definition of `IsBigO` in terms of filters, with the constant in the lower bound. -/
theorem isBigO_iff'' {g : α → E'''} :
f =O[l] g ↔ ∃ c > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?mp, fun h => ?mpr⟩
case mp =>
rw [isBigO_iff'] at h
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)]
case mpr =>
rw [isBigO_iff']
obtain ⟨c, ⟨hc_pos, hc⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨c⁻¹, ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩⟩
filter_upwards [hc] with x hx
rwa [← inv_inv c, inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity)] at hx
theorem IsBigO.of_bound (c : ℝ) (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff.2 ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound
theorem IsBigO.of_bound' (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound 1 <| by
simp_rw [one_mul]
exact h
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_bound' Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_bound'
theorem IsBigO.bound : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigO_iff.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.bound Asymptotics.IsBigO.bound
/-- The Landau notation `f =o[l] g` where `f` and `g` are two functions on a type `α` and `l` is
a filter on `α`, means that eventually for `l`, `‖f‖` is bounded by an arbitrarily small constant
multiple of `‖g‖`. In other words, `‖f‖ / ‖g‖` tends to `0` along `l`, modulo division by zero
issues that are avoided by this definition. -/
irreducible_def IsLittleO (l : Filter α) (f : α → E) (g : α → F) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g
#align asymptotics.is_o Asymptotics.IsLittleO
@[inherit_doc]
notation:100 f " =o[" l "] " g:100 => IsLittleO l f g
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of `IsBigOWith`. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → IsBigOWith c l f g := by
rw [IsLittleO_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
alias ⟨IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith, IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith⟩ := isLittleO_iff_forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.forall_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.forall_isBigOWith
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith
/-- Definition of `IsLittleO` in terms of filters. -/
theorem isLittleO_iff : f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ ⦃c : ℝ⦄, 0 < c → ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff
alias ⟨IsLittleO.bound, IsLittleO.of_bound⟩ := isLittleO_iff
#align asymptotics.is_o.bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.bound
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_bound Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_bound
theorem IsLittleO.def (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def
theorem IsLittleO.def' (h : f =o[l] g) (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigOWith_iff.2 <| isLittleO_iff.1 h hc
#align asymptotics.is_o.def' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.def'
theorem IsLittleO.eventuallyLE (h : f =o[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simpa using h.def zero_lt_one
end Defs
/-! ### Conversions -/
theorem IsBigOWith.isBigO (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) : f =O[l] g := by rw [IsBigO_def]; exact ⟨c, h⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.is_O Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.isBigO
theorem IsLittleO.isBigOWith (hgf : f =o[l] g) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
hgf.def' zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigOWith
theorem IsLittleO.isBigO (hgf : f =o[l] g) : f =O[l] g :=
hgf.isBigOWith.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_o.is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.isBigO
theorem IsBigO.isBigOWith : f =O[l] g → ∃ c : ℝ, IsBigOWith c l f g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.1
#align asymptotics.is_O.is_O_with Asymptotics.IsBigO.isBigOWith
theorem IsBigOWith.weaken (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (hc : c ≤ c') : IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_of_superset h.bound fun x hx =>
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ := hx
_ ≤ _ := by gcongr
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.weaken Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.weaken
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_pos (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' > 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
⟨max c 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right c 1), h.weaken <| le_max_left c 1⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_pos
theorem IsBigO.exists_pos (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c > 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_pos
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_pos Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_pos
theorem IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') :
∃ c' ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c' l f g' :=
let ⟨c, cpos, hc⟩ := h.exists_pos
⟨c, le_of_lt cpos, hc⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.exists_nonneg
theorem IsBigO.exists_nonneg (h : f =O[l] g') : ∃ c ≥ 0, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
hc.exists_nonneg
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_nonneg Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_nonneg
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `IsBigOWith c f g` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, IsBigOWith c l f g' :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.trans
⟨fun ⟨c, hc⟩ => mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨c, fun _c' hc' => hc.weaken hc'⟩, fun h => h.exists⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually_is_O_with Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith
/-- `f = O(g)` if and only if `∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖` for all sufficiently large `c`. -/
theorem isBigO_iff_eventually : f =O[l] g' ↔ ∀ᶠ c in atTop, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
isBigO_iff_eventually_isBigOWith.trans <| by simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
#align asymptotics.is_O_iff_eventually Asymptotics.isBigO_iff_eventually
theorem IsBigO.exists_mem_basis {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} (h : f =O[l] g')
(hb : l.HasBasis p s) :
∃ c > 0, ∃ i : ι, p i ∧ ∀ x ∈ s i, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g' x‖ :=
flip Exists.imp h.exists_pos fun c h => by
simpa only [isBigOWith_iff, hb.eventually_iff, exists_prop] using h
#align asymptotics.is_O.exists_mem_basis Asymptotics.IsBigO.exists_mem_basis
theorem isBigOWith_inv (hc : 0 < c) : IsBigOWith c⁻¹ l f g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, c * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, ← div_eq_inv_mul, le_div_iff' hc]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_inv Asymptotics.isBigOWith_inv
-- We prove this lemma with strange assumptions to get two lemmas below automatically
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (h₀ : (∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖f x‖) ∨ ∀ x, 0 ≤ ‖g x‖) :
f =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ := by
constructor
· rintro H (_ | n)
· refine (H.def one_pos).mono fun x h₀' => ?_
rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul]
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => (hf x).trans ?_) fun hg => hg x
rwa [one_mul] at h₀'
· have : (0 : ℝ) < n.succ := Nat.cast_pos.2 n.succ_pos
exact (isBigOWith_inv this).1 (H.def' <| inv_pos.2 this)
· refine fun H => isLittleO_iff.2 fun ε ε0 => ?_
rcases exists_nat_gt ε⁻¹ with ⟨n, hn⟩
have hn₀ : (0 : ℝ) < n := (inv_pos.2 ε0).trans hn
refine ((isBigOWith_inv hn₀).2 (H n)).bound.mono fun x hfg => ?_
refine hfg.trans (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (inv_le_of_inv_le ε0 hn.le) ?_)
refine h₀.elim (fun hf => nonneg_of_mul_nonneg_right ((hf x).trans hfg) ?_) fun h => h x
exact inv_pos.2 hn₀
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le_aux Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le : f =o[l] g' ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g' x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inr fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le
theorem isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le' : f' =o[l] g ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ x in l, ↑n * ‖f' x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖ :=
isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le_aux (Or.inl fun _x => norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_iff_nat_mul_le' Asymptotics.isLittleO_iff_nat_mul_le'
/-! ### Subsingleton -/
@[nontriviality]
theorem isLittleO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =o[l] g' :=
IsLittleO.of_bound fun c hc => by simp [Subsingleton.elim (f' _) 0, mul_nonneg hc.le]
#align asymptotics.is_o_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isLittleO_of_subsingleton
@[nontriviality]
theorem isBigO_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton E'] : f' =O[l] g' :=
isLittleO_of_subsingleton.isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_subsingleton Asymptotics.isBigO_of_subsingleton
section congr
variable {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F}
/-! ### Congruence -/
theorem isBigOWith_congr (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁ ↔ IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
subst c₂
apply Filter.eventually_congr
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with _ e₁ e₂
rw [e₁, e₂]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_congr Asymptotics.isBigOWith_congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr' (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
(isBigOWith_congr hc hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr'
theorem IsBigOWith.congr (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f₁ g₁) (hc : c₁ = c₂) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x)
(hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f₂ g₂ :=
h.congr' hc (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_left (h : IsBigOWith c l f₁ g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f₂ g :=
h.congr rfl hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_left
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_right (h : IsBigOWith c l f g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
IsBigOWith c l f g₂ :=
h.congr rfl (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_right
theorem IsBigOWith.congr_const (h : IsBigOWith c₁ l f g) (hc : c₁ = c₂) : IsBigOWith c₂ l f g :=
h.congr hc (fun _ => rfl) fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.congr_const Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.congr_const
theorem isBigO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =O[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =O[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun c => isBigOWith_congr rfl hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_O_congr Asymptotics.isBigO_congr
theorem IsBigO.congr' (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
(isBigO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr' Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr'
theorem IsBigO.congr (h : f₁ =O[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr
theorem IsBigO.congr_left (h : f₁ =O[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =O[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_left
theorem IsBigO.congr_right (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.congr_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.congr_right
theorem isLittleO_congr (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ =o[l] g₁ ↔ f₂ =o[l] g₂ := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun c _hc => isBigOWith_congr (Eq.refl c) hf hg
#align asymptotics.is_o_congr Asymptotics.isLittleO_congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr' (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
(isLittleO_congr hf hg).mp h
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr' Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr'
theorem IsLittleO.congr (h : f₁ =o[l] g₁) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) :
f₂ =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' (univ_mem' hf) (univ_mem' hg)
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr
theorem IsLittleO.congr_left (h : f₁ =o[l] g) (hf : ∀ x, f₁ x = f₂ x) : f₂ =o[l] g :=
h.congr hf fun _ => rfl
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_left
theorem IsLittleO.congr_right (h : f =o[l] g₁) (hg : ∀ x, g₁ x = g₂ x) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr (fun _ => rfl) hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.congr_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.congr_right
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =O[l] g) : f₁ =O[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_O Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
instance transEventuallyEqIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isBigO
@[trans]
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂)
(h : f₂ =o[l] g) : f₁ =o[l] g :=
h.congr' hf.symm EventuallyEq.rfl
#align filter.eventually_eq.trans_is_o Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
instance transEventuallyEqIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → E) (α → F) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := Filter.EventuallyEq.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =O[l] g₁) (hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) :
f =O[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsBigOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =O[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_eventuallyEq
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq {f : α → E} {g₁ g₂ : α → F} (h : f =o[l] g₁)
(hg : g₁ =ᶠ[l] g₂) : f =o[l] g₂ :=
h.congr' EventuallyEq.rfl hg
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_eventually_eq Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
instance transIsLittleOEventuallyEq :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → F) (· =o[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_eventuallyEq
end congr
/-! ### Filter operations and transitivity -/
theorem IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto (hcfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β}
(hk : Tendsto k l' l) : IsBigOWith c l' (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hk hcfg.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.comp_tendsto
theorem IsBigO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =O[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =O[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| hfg.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_O.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsBigO.comp_tendsto
theorem IsLittleO.comp_tendsto (hfg : f =o[l] g) {k : β → α} {l' : Filter β} (hk : Tendsto k l' l) :
(f ∘ k) =o[l'] (g ∘ k) :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (hfg.forall_isBigOWith cpos).comp_tendsto hk
#align asymptotics.is_o.comp_tendsto Asymptotics.IsLittleO.comp_tendsto
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} :
IsBigOWith c (map k l) f g ↔ IsBigOWith c l (f ∘ k) (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def]
exact eventually_map
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_map Asymptotics.isBigOWith_map
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =O[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =O[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsBigO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_O_map Asymptotics.isBigO_map
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_map {k : β → α} {l : Filter β} : f =o[map k l] g ↔ (f ∘ k) =o[l] (g ∘ k) := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def, isBigOWith_map]
#align asymptotics.is_o_map Asymptotics.isLittleO_map
theorem IsBigOWith.mono (h : IsBigOWith c l' f g) (hl : l ≤ l') : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| hl h.bound
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.mono Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.mono
theorem IsBigO.mono (h : f =O[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =O[l] g :=
isBigO_iff_isBigOWith.2 <| h.isBigOWith.imp fun _c h => h.mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_O.mono Asymptotics.IsBigO.mono
theorem IsLittleO.mono (h : f =o[l'] g) (hl : l ≤ l') : f =o[l] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).mono hl
#align asymptotics.is_o.mono Asymptotics.IsLittleO.mono
theorem IsBigOWith.trans (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c' l g k) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith (c * c') l f k := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def] at *
filter_upwards [hfg, hgk] with x hx hx'
calc
‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ := hx
_ ≤ c * (c' * ‖k x‖) := by gcongr
_ = c * c' * ‖k x‖ := (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g) (hgk : g =O[l] k) :
f =O[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cnonneg, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_nonneg
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := hgk.isBigOWith
(hc.trans hc' cnonneg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans
instance transIsBigOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : IsBigOWith c l g k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact ((hfg this).trans hgk this.le).congr_const (div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O_with Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigOWith
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G'} (hfg : f =o[l] g)
(hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hgk.exists_pos
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hc cpos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
instance transIsLittleOIsBigO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G') (· =o[l] ·) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans_isBigO
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) (hc : 0 < c) :
f =o[l] k := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def] at *
intro c' c'pos
have : 0 < c' / c := div_pos c'pos hc
exact (hfg.trans (hgk this) hc.le).congr_const (mul_div_cancel₀ _ hc.ne')
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsBigO.trans_isLittleO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =O[l] g)
(hgk : g =o[l] k) : f =o[l] k :=
let ⟨_c, cpos, hc⟩ := hfg.exists_pos
hc.trans_isLittleO hgk cpos
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
instance transIsBigOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F') (α → G) (· =O[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsBigO.trans_isLittleO
@[trans]
theorem IsLittleO.trans {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {k : α → G} (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : g =o[l] k) :
f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith hgk.isBigOWith one_pos
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans
instance transIsLittleOIsLittleO :
@Trans (α → E) (α → F) (α → G) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) (· =o[l] ·) where
trans := IsLittleO.trans
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → F'} {k : α → G}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) (hgk : g =O[l] k) : f =O[l] k :=
(IsBigO.of_bound' hfg).trans hgk
#align filter.eventually.trans_is_O Filter.Eventually.trans_isBigO
theorem _root_.Filter.Eventually.isBigO {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} {l : Filter α}
(hfg : ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) : f =O[l] g :=
IsBigO.of_bound' <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans <| Real.le_norm_self _
#align filter.eventually.is_O Filter.Eventually.isBigO
section
variable (l)
theorem isBigOWith_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith c l f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| univ_mem' hfg
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le'
theorem isBigOWith_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : IsBigOWith 1 l f g :=
isBigOWith_of_le' l fun x => by
rw [one_mul]
exact hfg x
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_of_le Asymptotics.isBigOWith_of_le
theorem isBigO_of_le' (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le' l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le' Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le'
theorem isBigO_of_le (hfg : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : f =O[l] g :=
(isBigOWith_of_le l hfg).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_of_le Asymptotics.isBigO_of_le
end
theorem isBigOWith_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : IsBigOWith 1 l f f :=
isBigOWith_of_le l fun _ => le_rfl
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_refl Asymptotics.isBigOWith_refl
theorem isBigO_refl (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) : f =O[l] f :=
(isBigOWith_refl f l).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_refl Asymptotics.isBigO_refl
theorem _root_.Filter.EventuallyEq.isBigO {f₁ f₂ : α → E} (hf : f₁ =ᶠ[l] f₂) : f₁ =O[l] f₂ :=
hf.trans_isBigO (isBigO_refl _ _)
theorem IsBigOWith.trans_le (hfg : IsBigOWith c l f g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) (hc : 0 ≤ c) :
IsBigOWith c l f k :=
(hfg.trans (isBigOWith_of_le l hgk) hc).congr_const <| mul_one c
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.trans_le
theorem IsBigO.trans_le (hfg : f =O[l] g') (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g' x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =O[l] k :=
hfg.trans (isBigO_of_le l hgk)
#align asymptotics.is_O.trans_le Asymptotics.IsBigO.trans_le
theorem IsLittleO.trans_le (hfg : f =o[l] g) (hgk : ∀ x, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖k x‖) : f =o[l] k :=
hfg.trans_isBigOWith (isBigOWith_of_le _ hgk) zero_lt_one
#align asymptotics.is_o.trans_le Asymptotics.IsLittleO.trans_le
theorem isLittleO_irrefl' (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, ‖f' x‖ ≠ 0) : ¬f' =o[l] f' := by
intro ho
rcases ((ho.bound one_half_pos).and_frequently h).exists with ⟨x, hle, hne⟩
rw [one_div, ← div_eq_inv_mul] at hle
exact (half_lt_self (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) hne.symm)).not_le hle
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl' Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl'
theorem isLittleO_irrefl (h : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) : ¬f'' =o[l] f'' :=
isLittleO_irrefl' <| h.mono fun _x => norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr
#align asymptotics.is_o_irrefl Asymptotics.isLittleO_irrefl
theorem IsBigO.not_isLittleO (h : f'' =O[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =o[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isLittleO h')
#align asymptotics.is_O.not_is_o Asymptotics.IsBigO.not_isLittleO
theorem IsLittleO.not_isBigO (h : f'' =o[l] g') (hf : ∃ᶠ x in l, f'' x ≠ 0) :
¬g' =O[l] f'' := fun h' =>
isLittleO_irrefl hf (h.trans_isBigO h')
#align asymptotics.is_o.not_is_O Asymptotics.IsLittleO.not_isBigO
section Bot
variable (c f g)
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_bot : IsBigOWith c ⊥ f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| trivial
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_bot Asymptotics.isBigOWith_bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_bot : f =O[⊥] g :=
(isBigOWith_bot 1 f g).isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O_bot Asymptotics.isBigO_bot
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_bot : f =o[⊥] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun c _ => isBigOWith_bot c f g
#align asymptotics.is_o_bot Asymptotics.isLittleO_bot
end Bot
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_pure {x} : IsBigOWith c (pure x) f g ↔ ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖ :=
isBigOWith_iff
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_pure Asymptotics.isBigOWith_pure
theorem IsBigOWith.sup (h : IsBigOWith c l f g) (h' : IsBigOWith c l' f g) :
IsBigOWith c (l ⊔ l') f g :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <| mem_sup.2 ⟨h.bound, h'.bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup
theorem IsBigOWith.sup' (h : IsBigOWith c l f g') (h' : IsBigOWith c' l' f g') :
IsBigOWith (max c c') (l ⊔ l') f g' :=
IsBigOWith.of_bound <|
mem_sup.2 ⟨(h.weaken <| le_max_left c c').bound, (h'.weaken <| le_max_right c c').bound⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.sup' Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.sup'
theorem IsBigO.sup (h : f =O[l] g') (h' : f =O[l'] g') : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' :=
let ⟨_c, hc⟩ := h.isBigOWith
let ⟨_c', hc'⟩ := h'.isBigOWith
(hc.sup' hc').isBigO
#align asymptotics.is_O.sup Asymptotics.IsBigO.sup
theorem IsLittleO.sup (h : f =o[l] g) (h' : f =o[l'] g) : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g :=
IsLittleO.of_isBigOWith fun _c cpos => (h.forall_isBigOWith cpos).sup (h'.forall_isBigOWith cpos)
#align asymptotics.is_o.sup Asymptotics.IsLittleO.sup
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_sup : f =O[l ⊔ l'] g' ↔ f =O[l] g' ∧ f =O[l'] g' :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_O_sup Asymptotics.isBigO_sup
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_sup : f =o[l ⊔ l'] g ↔ f =o[l] g ∧ f =o[l'] g :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono le_sup_left, h.mono le_sup_right⟩, fun h => h.1.sup h.2⟩
#align asymptotics.is_o_sup Asymptotics.isLittleO_sup
theorem isBigOWith_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E} {g' : α → F}
(h : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' ↔
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g' := by
simp_rw [IsBigOWith_def, nhdsWithin_insert, eventually_sup, eventually_pure, h, true_and_iff]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_insert Asymptotics.isBigOWith_insert
protected theorem IsBigOWith.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {C : ℝ} {g : α → E}
{g' : α → F} (h1 : IsBigOWith C (𝓝[s] x) g g') (h2 : ‖g x‖ ≤ C * ‖g' x‖) :
IsBigOWith C (𝓝[insert x s] x) g g' :=
(isBigOWith_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.insert Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.insert
theorem isLittleO_insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'} {g' : α → F'}
(h : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' ↔ g =o[𝓝[s] x] g' := by
simp_rw [IsLittleO_def]
refine forall_congr' fun c => forall_congr' fun hc => ?_
rw [isBigOWith_insert]
rw [h, norm_zero]
exact mul_nonneg hc.le (norm_nonneg _)
#align asymptotics.is_o_insert Asymptotics.isLittleO_insert
protected theorem IsLittleO.insert [TopologicalSpace α] {x : α} {s : Set α} {g : α → E'}
{g' : α → F'} (h1 : g =o[𝓝[s] x] g') (h2 : g x = 0) : g =o[𝓝[insert x s] x] g' :=
(isLittleO_insert h2).mpr h1
#align asymptotics.is_o.insert Asymptotics.IsLittleO.insert
/-! ### Simplification : norm, abs -/
section NormAbs
variable {u v : α → ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => |u x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f u :=
@isBigOWith_norm_right _ _ _ _ _ _ f u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_right, IsBigOWith.norm_right⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_right, IsBigOWith.abs_right⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_right : (f =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_right Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_right : (f =O[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =O[l] u :=
@isBigO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_right Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_right, IsBigO.norm_right⟩ := isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_right, IsBigO.abs_right⟩ := isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_right Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_right : (f =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f =o[l] g' := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_right
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_right : (f =o[l] fun x => |u x|) ↔ f =o[l] u :=
@isLittleO_norm_right _ _ ℝ _ _ _ _ _
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_right Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_right, IsLittleO.norm_right⟩ := isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_right
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_right, IsLittleO.abs_right⟩ := isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_right Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_right
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_norm_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_norm]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_abs_left : IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) g ↔ IsBigOWith c l u g :=
@isBigOWith_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_left, IsBigOWith.norm_left⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_left, IsBigOWith.abs_left⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] g ↔ f' =O[l] g := by
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_left Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isBigO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =O[l] g ↔ u =O[l] g :=
@isBigO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_left Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_left, IsBigO.norm_left⟩ := isBigO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_left, IsBigO.abs_left⟩ := isBigO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_left Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_norm_left : (fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] g ↔ f' =o[l] g := by
simp only [IsLittleO_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun _ _ => isBigOWith_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_left
@[simp]
theorem isLittleO_abs_left : (fun x => |u x|) =o[l] g ↔ u =o[l] g :=
@isLittleO_norm_left _ _ _ _ _ g u l
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_left Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_left, IsLittleO.norm_left⟩ := isLittleO_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_left
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_left, IsLittleO.abs_left⟩ := isLittleO_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_left
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_left Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_left
theorem isBigOWith_norm_norm :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => ‖f' x‖) fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f' g' :=
isBigOWith_norm_left.trans isBigOWith_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigOWith_norm_norm
theorem isBigOWith_abs_abs :
(IsBigOWith c l (fun x => |u x|) fun x => |v x|) ↔ IsBigOWith c l u v :=
isBigOWith_abs_left.trans isBigOWith_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigOWith_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm, IsBigOWith.norm_norm⟩ := isBigOWith_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs, IsBigOWith.abs_abs⟩ := isBigOWith_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.abs_abs
theorem isBigO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =O[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =O[l] g' :=
isBigO_norm_left.trans isBigO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_norm_norm Asymptotics.isBigO_norm_norm
theorem isBigO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =O[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =O[l] v :=
isBigO_abs_left.trans isBigO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_abs_abs Asymptotics.isBigO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_norm_norm, IsBigO.norm_norm⟩ := isBigO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_O.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsBigO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsBigO.of_abs_abs, IsBigO.abs_abs⟩ := isBigO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_O.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsBigO.abs_abs
theorem isLittleO_norm_norm : ((fun x => ‖f' x‖) =o[l] fun x => ‖g' x‖) ↔ f' =o[l] g' :=
isLittleO_norm_left.trans isLittleO_norm_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_norm_norm Asymptotics.isLittleO_norm_norm
theorem isLittleO_abs_abs : ((fun x => |u x|) =o[l] fun x => |v x|) ↔ u =o[l] v :=
isLittleO_abs_left.trans isLittleO_abs_right
#align asymptotics.is_o_abs_abs Asymptotics.isLittleO_abs_abs
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_norm_norm, IsLittleO.norm_norm⟩ := isLittleO_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_norm_norm
#align asymptotics.is_o.norm_norm Asymptotics.IsLittleO.norm_norm
alias ⟨IsLittleO.of_abs_abs, IsLittleO.abs_abs⟩ := isLittleO_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.of_abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.of_abs_abs
#align asymptotics.is_o.abs_abs Asymptotics.IsLittleO.abs_abs
end NormAbs
/-! ### Simplification: negate -/
@[simp]
theorem isBigOWith_neg_right : (IsBigOWith c l f fun x => -g' x) ↔ IsBigOWith c l f g' := by
simp only [IsBigOWith_def, norm_neg]
#align asymptotics.is_O_with_neg_right Asymptotics.isBigOWith_neg_right
alias ⟨IsBigOWith.of_neg_right, IsBigOWith.neg_right⟩ := isBigOWith_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.of_neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.of_neg_right
#align asymptotics.is_O_with.neg_right Asymptotics.IsBigOWith.neg_right
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Asymptotics/Asymptotics.lean | 906 | 908 | theorem isBigO_neg_right : (f =O[l] fun x => -g' x) ↔ f =O[l] g' := by |
simp only [IsBigO_def]
exact exists_congr fun _ => isBigOWith_neg_right
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.EssSup
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
#align_import measure_theory.function.lp_seminorm from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c4015acc0a223449d44061e27ddac1835a3852b9"
/-!
# ℒp space
This file describes properties of almost everywhere strongly measurable functions with finite
`p`-seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ` and defined for `p:ℝ≥0∞` as `0` if `p=0`,
`(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and `essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p=∞`.
The Prop-valued `Memℒp f p μ` states that a function `f : α → E` has finite `p`-seminorm
and is almost everywhere strongly measurable.
## Main definitions
* `snorm' f p μ` : `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `f : α → F` and `p : ℝ`, where `α` is a measurable
space and `F` is a normed group.
* `snormEssSup f μ` : seminorm in `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum `ess_sup ‖f‖ μ`.
* `snorm f p μ` : for `p : ℝ≥0∞`, seminorm in `ℒp`, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `snorm' f p μ`
for `0 < p < ∞` and to `snormEssSup f μ` for `p = ∞`.
* `Memℒp f p μ` : property that the function `f` is almost everywhere strongly measurable and has
finite `p`-seminorm for the measure `μ` (`snorm f p μ < ∞`)
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology
variable {α E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G]
namespace MeasureTheory
section ℒp
/-!
### ℒp seminorm
We define the ℒp seminorm, denoted by `snorm f p μ`. For real `p`, it is given by an integral
formula (for which we use the notation `snorm' f p μ`), and for `p = ∞` it is the essential
supremum (for which we use the notation `snormEssSup f μ`).
We also define a predicate `Memℒp f p μ`, requesting that a function is almost everywhere
measurable and has finite `snorm f p μ`.
This paragraph is devoted to the basic properties of these definitions. It is constructed as
follows: for a given property, we prove it for `snorm'` and `snormEssSup` when it makes sense,
deduce it for `snorm`, and translate it in terms of `Memℒp`.
-/
section ℒpSpaceDefinition
/-- `(∫ ‖f a‖^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)`, which is a seminorm on the space of measurable functions for which
this quantity is finite -/
def snorm' {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
(∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
#align measure_theory.snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm'
/-- seminorm for `ℒ∞`, equal to the essential supremum of `‖f‖`. -/
def snormEssSup {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (μ : Measure α) :=
essSup (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup MeasureTheory.snormEssSup
/-- `ℒp` seminorm, equal to `0` for `p=0`, to `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `0 < p < ∞` and to
`essSup ‖f‖ μ` for `p = ∞`. -/
def snorm {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
if p = 0 then 0 else if p = ∞ then snormEssSup f μ else snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ
#align measure_theory.snorm MeasureTheory.snorm
theorem snorm_eq_snorm' (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = snorm' f (ENNReal.toReal p) μ := by simp [snorm, hp_ne_zero, hp_ne_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_snorm' MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_snorm'
theorem snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} :
snorm f p μ = (∫⁻ x, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm
theorem snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm {f : α → F} : snorm f 1 μ = ∫⁻ x, ‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := by
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm one_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ENNReal.one_toReal,
one_div_one, ENNReal.rpow_one]
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm
@[simp]
theorem snorm_exponent_top {f : α → F} : snorm f ∞ μ = snormEssSup f μ := by simp [snorm]
#align measure_theory.snorm_exponent_top MeasureTheory.snorm_exponent_top
/-- The property that `f:α→E` is ae strongly measurable and `(∫ ‖f a‖^p ∂μ)^(1/p)` is finite
if `p < ∞`, or `essSup f < ∞` if `p = ∞`. -/
def Memℒp {α} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞)
(μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ ∧ snorm f p μ < ∞
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.Memℒp
theorem Memℒp.aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (h : Memℒp f p μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
h.1
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.Memℒp.aestronglyMeasurable
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q) :
(∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) = snorm' f q μ ^ q := by
rw [snorm', ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
exact (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm'
end ℒpSpaceDefinition
section Top
theorem Memℒp.snorm_lt_top {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_lt_top
theorem Memℒp.snorm_ne_top {f : α → E} (hfp : Memℒp f p μ) : snorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.snorm_ne_top MeasureTheory.Memℒp.snorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : snorm' f q μ < ∞) : (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_eq_rpow_snorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : snorm f p μ < ∞) : (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
#align measure_theory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top
theorem snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top {f : α → F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : snorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ (∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p.toReal ∂μ) < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_snorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
#align measure_theory.snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top MeasureTheory.snorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [snorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_exponent_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [snorm]
#align measure_theory.snorm_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_exponent_zero
@[simp]
theorem memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable {f : α → E} :
Memℒp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [Memℒp, snorm_exponent_zero]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_zero_iff_ae_strongly_measurable MeasureTheory.memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 := by simp [snorm', hp0_lt]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : snorm' (0 : α → F) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact snorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [snorm', ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_zero' MeasureTheory.snorm'_zero'
@[simp]
theorem snormEssSup_zero : snormEssSup (0 : α → F) μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, Pi.zero_apply, nnnorm_zero, ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.bot_eq_zero]
exact essSup_const_bot
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_zero MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_zero : snorm (0 : α → F) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_zero' : snorm (fun _ : α => (0 : F)) p μ = 0 := by convert snorm_zero (F := F)
#align measure_theory.snorm_zero' MeasureTheory.snorm_zero'
theorem zero_memℒp : Memℒp (0 : α → E) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by
rw [snorm_zero]
exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.zero_mem_ℒp MeasureTheory.zero_memℒp
theorem zero_mem_ℒp' : Memℒp (fun _ : α => (0 : E)) p μ := zero_memℒp (E := E)
#align measure_theory.zero_mem_ℒp' MeasureTheory.zero_mem_ℒp'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → F} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [snorm', hq_pos]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_pos
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → F} : snorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero
theorem snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → F} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
snorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [snorm', hq_neg]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg MeasureTheory.snorm'_measure_zero_of_neg
@[simp]
theorem snormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [snormEssSup]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_measure_zero MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_measure_zero
@[simp]
theorem snorm_measure_zero {f : α → F} : snorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_measure_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_measure_zero
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_neg {f : α → F} : snorm' (-f) q μ = snorm' f q μ := by simp [snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm'_neg MeasureTheory.snorm'_neg
@[simp]
theorem snorm_neg {f : α → F} : snorm (-f) p μ = snorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, snormEssSup]
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_neg MeasureTheory.snorm_neg
theorem Memℒp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.neg MeasureTheory.Memℒp.neg
theorem memℒp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : Memℒp (-f) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, Memℒp.neg⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_neg_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
theorem snorm'_const (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const MeasureTheory.snorm'_const
theorem snorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [snorm', lintegral_const, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
constructor
· left
rwa [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, nnnorm_eq_zero]
· exact Or.inl ENNReal.coe_ne_top
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const' MeasureTheory.snorm'_const'
theorem snormEssSup_const (c : F) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by rw [snormEssSup, essSup_const _ hμ]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_const MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_const
theorem snorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
snorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by simp [snorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const_of_is_probability_measure MeasureTheory.snorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure
theorem snorm_const (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, snormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_const MeasureTheory.snorm_const
theorem snorm_const' (c : F) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top, snorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
#align measure_theory.snorm_const' MeasureTheory.snorm_const'
theorem snorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
snorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true_iff, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
snorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, snorm_zero']
rw [snorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
by_cases hμ_top : μ Set.univ = ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simp only [true_and_iff, one_div, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, false_or_iff, or_false_iff,
ENNReal.coe_lt_top, nnnorm_eq_zero, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero,
MeasureTheory.Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero, hp, inv_lt_zero, hc, and_false_iff, false_and_iff,
inv_pos, or_self_iff, hμ_top, Ne.lt_top hμ_top, iff_true_iff]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_const_lt_top_iff MeasureTheory.snorm_const_lt_top_iff
theorem memℒp_const (c : E) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] : Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) p μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp [hμ]
rw [snorm_const c h0 hμ]
refine ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top ?_
refine (ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg ?_ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)).ne
simp
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_const
theorem memℒp_top_const (c : E) : Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) ∞ μ := by
refine ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, ?_⟩
by_cases h : μ = 0
· simp only [h, snorm_measure_zero, ENNReal.zero_lt_top]
· rw [snorm_const _ ENNReal.top_ne_zero h]
simp only [ENNReal.top_toReal, div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero, mul_one, ENNReal.coe_lt_top]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_top_const MeasureTheory.memℒp_top_const
theorem memℒp_const_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : E} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp (fun _ : α => c) p μ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
rw [← snorm_const_lt_top_iff hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
exact ⟨fun h => h.2, fun h => ⟨aestronglyMeasurable_const, h⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_const_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_const_iff
end Const
theorem snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm' g q μ := by
simp only [snorm']
gcongr ?_ ^ (1/q)
refine lintegral_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ?_)
gcongr
#align measure_theory.snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm'_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hq : 0 ≤ q) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
snorm' f q μ ≤ snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae hq h
#align measure_theory.snorm'_mono_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_mono_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ := by
have : (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q) =ᵐ[μ] fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q :=
hfg.mono fun x hx => by simp_rw [hx]
simp only [snorm', lintegral_congr_ae this]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_norm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_norm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_norm_ae
theorem snorm'_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snorm' f q μ = snorm' g q μ :=
snorm'_congr_nnnorm_ae (hfg.fun_comp _)
#align measure_theory.snorm'_congr_ae MeasureTheory.snorm'_congr_ae
theorem snormEssSup_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snormEssSup f μ = snormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_congr_ae (hfg.fun_comp (((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∘ nnnorm))
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_congr_ae MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_congr_ae
theorem snormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ snormEssSup g μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ := by
simp only [snorm]
split_ifs
· exact le_rfl
· exact essSup_mono_ae (h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx)
· exact snorm'_mono_nnnorm_ae ENNReal.toReal_nonneg h
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm_mono_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae h
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_ae
theorem snorm_mono_ae_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae <| h.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans ((le_abs_self _).trans (Real.norm_eq_abs _).symm.le)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_ae_real MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_ae_real
theorem snorm_mono_nnnorm {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_nnnorm MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_nnnorm
theorem snorm_mono {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono MeasureTheory.snorm_mono
theorem snorm_mono_real {f : α → F} {g : α → ℝ} (h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ g x) :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm g p μ :=
snorm_mono_ae_real (eventually_of_forall fun x => h x)
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_real MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_real
theorem snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ C :=
essSup_le_of_ae_le (C : ℝ≥0∞) <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal C :=
snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound <| hfC.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound
theorem snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(snormEssSup_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.coe_lt_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
snormEssSup f μ < ∞ :=
(snormEssSup_le_of_ae_bound hfC).trans_lt ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_lt_top_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound
theorem snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ C) :
snorm f p μ ≤ C • μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero μ with rfl | hμ
· simp
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ ‖(C : ℝ)‖₊ := hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans_eq C.nnnorm_eq.symm
refine (snorm_mono_ae this).trans_eq ?_
rw [snorm_const _ hp (NeZero.ne μ), C.nnnorm_eq, one_div, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound MeasureTheory.snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound
theorem snorm_le_of_ae_bound {f : α → F} {C : ℝ} (hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
snorm f p μ ≤ μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ * ENNReal.ofReal C := by
rw [← mul_comm]
exact snorm_le_of_ae_nnnorm_bound (hfC.mono fun x hx => hx.trans C.le_coe_toNNReal)
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_of_ae_bound MeasureTheory.snorm_le_of_ae_bound
theorem snorm_congr_nnnorm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ = ‖g x‖₊) :
snorm f p μ = snorm g p μ :=
le_antisymm (snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| EventuallyEq.le hfg)
(snorm_mono_nnnorm_ae <| (EventuallyEq.symm hfg).le)
#align measure_theory.snorm_congr_nnnorm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_congr_nnnorm_ae
theorem snorm_congr_norm_ae {f : α → F} {g : α → G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ = ‖g x‖) :
snorm f p μ = snorm g p μ :=
snorm_congr_nnnorm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => NNReal.eq hx
#align measure_theory.snorm_congr_norm_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_congr_norm_ae
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem snorm_indicator_sub_indicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) :
snorm (s.indicator f - t.indicator f) p μ = snorm ((s ∆ t).indicator f) p μ :=
snorm_congr_norm_ae <| ae_of_all _ fun x ↦ by
simp only [Pi.sub_apply, Set.apply_indicator_symmDiff norm_neg]
@[simp]
theorem snorm'_norm {f : α → F} : snorm' (fun a => ‖f a‖) q μ = snorm' f q μ := by simp [snorm']
#align measure_theory.snorm'_norm MeasureTheory.snorm'_norm
@[simp]
theorem snorm_norm (f : α → F) : snorm (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ = snorm f p μ :=
snorm_congr_norm_ae <| eventually_of_forall fun _ => norm_norm _
#align measure_theory.snorm_norm MeasureTheory.snorm_norm
theorem snorm'_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (p q : ℝ) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = snorm' f (p * q) μ ^ q := by
simp_rw [snorm']
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, ← one_div_mul_one_div]
simp_rw [one_div]
rw [mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel hq_pos.ne.symm, mul_one]
congr
ext1 x
simp_rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
rw [Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_eq_self.mpr (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), mul_comm, ←
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hq_pos.le, ENNReal.rpow_mul]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_norm_rpow MeasureTheory.snorm'_norm_rpow
theorem snorm_norm_rpow (f : α → F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ q) p μ = snorm f (p * ENNReal.ofReal q) μ ^ q := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos hq_pos]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp only [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top, ENNReal.top_mul', hq_pos.not_le, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero,
if_false, snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup]
have h_rpow :
essSup (fun x : α => (‖‖f x‖ ^ q‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ =
essSup (fun x : α => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q) μ := by
congr
ext1 x
conv_rhs => rw [← nnnorm_norm]
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hq_pos.le, ENNReal.coe_inj]
ext
push_cast
rw [Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _)]
rw [h_rpow]
have h_rpow_mono := ENNReal.strictMono_rpow_of_pos hq_pos
have h_rpow_surj := (ENNReal.rpow_left_bijective hq_pos.ne.symm).2
let iso := h_rpow_mono.orderIsoOfSurjective _ h_rpow_surj
exact (iso.essSup_apply (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ).symm
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 hp_top, snorm_eq_snorm' _ _]
swap;
· refine mul_ne_zero h0 ?_
rwa [Ne, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le]
swap; · exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top hp_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top
rw [ENNReal.toReal_mul, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal hq_pos.le]
exact snorm'_norm_rpow f p.toReal q hq_pos
#align measure_theory.snorm_norm_rpow MeasureTheory.snorm_norm_rpow
theorem snorm_congr_ae {f g : α → F} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : snorm f p μ = snorm g p μ :=
snorm_congr_norm_ae <| hfg.mono fun _x hx => hx ▸ rfl
#align measure_theory.snorm_congr_ae MeasureTheory.snorm_congr_ae
theorem memℒp_congr_ae {f g : α → E} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : Memℒp f p μ ↔ Memℒp g p μ := by
simp only [Memℒp, snorm_congr_ae hfg, aestronglyMeasurable_congr hfg]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_congr_ae MeasureTheory.memℒp_congr_ae
theorem Memℒp.ae_eq {f g : α → E} (hfg : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (hf_Lp : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp g p μ :=
(memℒp_congr_ae hfg).1 hf_Lp
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.ae_eq MeasureTheory.Memℒp.ae_eq
theorem Memℒp.of_le {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hg : Memℒp g p μ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ ‖g x‖) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨hf, (snorm_mono_ae hfg).trans_lt hg.snorm_lt_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_le MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_le
alias Memℒp.mono := Memℒp.of_le
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.mono MeasureTheory.Memℒp.mono
theorem Memℒp.mono' {f : α → E} {g : α → ℝ} (hg : Memℒp g p μ) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ ≤ g a) : Memℒp f p μ :=
hg.mono hf <| h.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.mono' MeasureTheory.Memℒp.mono'
theorem Memℒp.congr_norm {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : Memℒp g p μ :=
hf.mono hg <| EventuallyEq.le <| EventuallyEq.symm h
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.congr_norm MeasureTheory.Memℒp.congr_norm
theorem memℒp_congr_norm {f : α → E} {g : α → F} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ‖f a‖ = ‖g a‖) : Memℒp f p μ ↔ Memℒp g p μ :=
⟨fun h2f => h2f.congr_norm hg h, fun h2g => h2g.congr_norm hf <| EventuallyEq.symm h⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_congr_norm MeasureTheory.memℒp_congr_norm
theorem memℒp_top_of_bound {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (C : ℝ)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : Memℒp f ∞ μ :=
⟨hf, by
rw [snorm_exponent_top]
exact snormEssSup_lt_top_of_ae_bound hfC⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_top_of_bound MeasureTheory.memℒp_top_of_bound
theorem Memℒp.of_bound [IsFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (C : ℝ)
(hfC : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) : Memℒp f p μ :=
(memℒp_const C).of_le hf (hfC.mono fun _x hx => le_trans hx (le_abs_self _))
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_bound MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_bound
@[mono]
theorem snorm'_mono_measure (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≤ μ) (hq : 0 ≤ q) :
snorm' f q ν ≤ snorm' f q μ := by
simp_rw [snorm']
gcongr
exact lintegral_mono' hμν le_rfl
#align measure_theory.snorm'_mono_measure MeasureTheory.snorm'_mono_measure
@[mono]
theorem snormEssSup_mono_measure (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≪ μ) : snormEssSup f ν ≤ snormEssSup f μ := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup]
exact essSup_mono_measure hμν
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_mono_measure MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_mono_measure
@[mono]
theorem snorm_mono_measure (f : α → F) (hμν : ν ≤ μ) : snorm f p ν ≤ snorm f p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_mono_measure f (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le hμν)]
simp_rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp0 hp_top]
exact snorm'_mono_measure f hμν ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
#align measure_theory.snorm_mono_measure MeasureTheory.snorm_mono_measure
theorem Memℒp.mono_measure {f : α → E} (hμν : ν ≤ μ) (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp f p ν :=
⟨hf.1.mono_measure hμν, (snorm_mono_measure f hμν).trans_lt hf.2⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.mono_measure MeasureTheory.Memℒp.mono_measure
lemma snorm_restrict_le (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
snorm f p (μ.restrict s) ≤ snorm f p μ :=
snorm_mono_measure f Measure.restrict_le_self
theorem Memℒp.restrict (s : Set α) {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp f p (μ.restrict s) :=
hf.mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.restrict MeasureTheory.Memℒp.restrict
theorem snorm'_smul_measure {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) {f : α → F} (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm' f p (c • μ) = c ^ (1 / p) * snorm' f p μ := by
rw [snorm', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg, snorm']
simp [hp]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_smul_measure MeasureTheory.snorm'_smul_measure
theorem snormEssSup_smul_measure {f : α → F} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
snormEssSup f (c • μ) = snormEssSup f μ := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup]
exact essSup_smul_measure hc
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_smul_measure MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_smul_measure
/-- Use `snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_top` instead. -/
private theorem snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p (c • μ) = c ^ (1 / p).toReal • snorm f p μ := by
simp_rw [snorm_eq_snorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
rw [snorm'_smul_measure ENNReal.toReal_nonneg]
congr
simp_rw [one_div]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_inv]
theorem snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : α → F} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
snorm f p (c • μ) = c ^ (1 / p).toReal • snorm f p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp [hp_top, snormEssSup_smul_measure hc]
exact snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top hp0 hp_top c
#align measure_theory.snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero
theorem snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_top {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p (c • μ) = c ^ (1 / p).toReal • snorm f p μ := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
· exact snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top hp0 hp_ne_top c
#align measure_theory.snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_top MeasureTheory.snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_top
theorem snorm_one_smul_measure {f : α → F} (c : ℝ≥0∞) : snorm f 1 (c • μ) = c * snorm f 1 μ := by
rw [@snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_top _ _ _ μ _ 1 (@ENNReal.coe_ne_top 1) f c]
simp
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_smul_measure MeasureTheory.snorm_one_smul_measure
theorem Memℒp.of_measure_le_smul {μ' : Measure α} (c : ℝ≥0∞) (hc : c ≠ ∞) (hμ'_le : μ' ≤ c • μ)
{f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp f p μ' := by
refine ⟨hf.1.mono_ac (Measure.absolutelyContinuous_of_le_smul hμ'_le), ?_⟩
refine (snorm_mono_measure f hμ'_le).trans_lt ?_
by_cases hc0 : c = 0
· simp [hc0]
rw [snorm_smul_measure_of_ne_zero hc0, smul_eq_mul]
refine ENNReal.mul_lt_top ?_ hf.2.ne
simp [hc, hc0]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_measure_le_smul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_measure_le_smul
theorem Memℒp.smul_measure {f : α → E} {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (hc : c ≠ ∞) :
Memℒp f p (c • μ) :=
hf.of_measure_le_smul c hc le_rfl
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.smul_measure MeasureTheory.Memℒp.smul_measure
theorem snorm_one_add_measure (f : α → F) (μ ν : Measure α) :
snorm f 1 (μ + ν) = snorm f 1 μ + snorm f 1 ν := by
simp_rw [snorm_one_eq_lintegral_nnnorm]
rw [lintegral_add_measure _ μ ν]
#align measure_theory.snorm_one_add_measure MeasureTheory.snorm_one_add_measure
theorem snorm_le_add_measure_right (f : α → F) (μ ν : Measure α) {p : ℝ≥0∞} :
snorm f p μ ≤ snorm f p (μ + ν) :=
snorm_mono_measure f <| Measure.le_add_right <| le_refl _
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_add_measure_right MeasureTheory.snorm_le_add_measure_right
theorem snorm_le_add_measure_left (f : α → F) (μ ν : Measure α) {p : ℝ≥0∞} :
snorm f p ν ≤ snorm f p (μ + ν) :=
snorm_mono_measure f <| Measure.le_add_left <| le_refl _
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_add_measure_left MeasureTheory.snorm_le_add_measure_left
theorem Memℒp.left_of_add_measure {f : α → E} (h : Memℒp f p (μ + ν)) : Memℒp f p μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_right <| le_refl _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.left_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Memℒp.left_of_add_measure
theorem Memℒp.right_of_add_measure {f : α → E} (h : Memℒp f p (μ + ν)) : Memℒp f p ν :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.le_add_left <| le_refl _
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.right_of_add_measure MeasureTheory.Memℒp.right_of_add_measure
theorem Memℒp.norm {f : α → E} (h : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ :=
h.of_le h.aestronglyMeasurable.norm (eventually_of_forall fun x => by simp)
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.norm MeasureTheory.Memℒp.norm
theorem memℒp_norm_iff {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp (fun x => ‖f x‖) p μ ↔ Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨hf, by rw [← snorm_norm]; exact h.2⟩, fun h => h.norm⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_norm_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_norm_iff
theorem snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero {f : α → F} (hq0_lt : 0 < q) (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 := by rw [snorm'_congr_ae hf_zero, snorm'_zero hq0_lt]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero MeasureTheory.snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero
theorem snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) {f : α → F} (hf_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 := by rw [snorm'_congr_ae hf_zero, snorm'_zero' hq0_ne hμ]
#align measure_theory.snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero' MeasureTheory.snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero'
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero {f : α → E} (hq0 : 0 ≤ q) (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(h : snorm' f q μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [snorm', ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff] at h
cases h with
| inl h =>
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (hf.ennnorm.pow_const q)] at h
refine h.left.mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff] at hx
cases hx with
| inl hx =>
cases' hx with hx _
rwa [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ENNReal.coe_inj, nnnorm_eq_zero] at hx
| inr hx =>
exact absurd hx.left ENNReal.coe_ne_top
| inr h =>
exfalso
rw [one_div, inv_lt_zero] at h
exact hq0.not_lt h.right
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero MeasureTheory.ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero
theorem snorm'_eq_zero_iff (hq0_lt : 0 < q) {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
snorm' f q μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 :=
⟨ae_eq_zero_of_snorm'_eq_zero (le_of_lt hq0_lt) hf, snorm'_eq_zero_of_ae_zero hq0_lt⟩
#align measure_theory.snorm'_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.snorm'_eq_zero_iff
theorem coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snormEssSup {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → F) (μ : Measure α) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ snormEssSup f μ :=
ENNReal.ae_le_essSup fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)
#align measure_theory.coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snorm_ess_sup MeasureTheory.coe_nnnorm_ae_le_snormEssSup
@[simp]
theorem snormEssSup_eq_zero_iff {f : α → F} : snormEssSup f μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
simp [EventuallyEq, snormEssSup]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_eq_zero_iff
theorem snorm_eq_zero_iff {f : α → E} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (h0 : p ≠ 0) :
snorm f p μ = 0 ↔ f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· rw [h_top, snorm_exponent_top, snormEssSup_eq_zero_iff]
rw [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top]
exact snorm'_eq_zero_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top) hf
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_zero_iff MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_zero_iff
theorem ae_le_snormEssSup {f : α → F} : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ‖f y‖₊ ≤ snormEssSup f μ :=
ae_le_essSup
#align measure_theory.ae_le_snorm_ess_sup MeasureTheory.ae_le_snormEssSup
theorem meas_snormEssSup_lt {f : α → F} : μ { y | snormEssSup f μ < ‖f y‖₊ } = 0 :=
meas_essSup_lt
#align measure_theory.meas_snorm_ess_sup_lt MeasureTheory.meas_snormEssSup_lt
lemma snormEssSup_piecewise {s : Set α} (f g : α → E) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snormEssSup (Set.piecewise s f g) μ
= max (snormEssSup f (μ.restrict s)) (snormEssSup g (μ.restrict sᶜ)) := by
simp only [snormEssSup, ← ENNReal.essSup_piecewise hs]
congr with x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s <;> simp [hx]
lemma snorm_top_piecewise {s : Set α} (f g : α → E) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
snorm (Set.piecewise s f g) ∞ μ
= max (snorm f ∞ (μ.restrict s)) (snorm g ∞ (μ.restrict sᶜ)) :=
snormEssSup_piecewise f g hs
section MapMeasure
variable {β : Type*} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} {f : α → β} {g : β → E}
theorem snormEssSup_map_measure (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : snormEssSup g (Measure.map f μ) = snormEssSup (g ∘ f) μ :=
essSup_map_measure hg.ennnorm hf
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_map_measure MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_map_measure
theorem snorm_map_measure (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ)) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
snorm g p (Measure.map f μ) = snorm (g ∘ f) p μ := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_top : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp_top, snorm_exponent_top]
exact snormEssSup_map_measure hg hf
simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_zero hp_top]
rw [lintegral_map' (hg.ennnorm.pow_const p.toReal) hf]
rfl
#align measure_theory.snorm_map_measure MeasureTheory.snorm_map_measure
theorem memℒp_map_measure_iff (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g (Measure.map f μ))
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) : Memℒp g p (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ := by
simp [Memℒp, snorm_map_measure hg hf, hg.comp_aemeasurable hf, hg]
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff MeasureTheory.memℒp_map_measure_iff
theorem Memℒp.comp_of_map (hg : Memℒp g p (Measure.map f μ)) (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) :
Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
(memℒp_map_measure_iff hg.aestronglyMeasurable hf).1 hg
theorem snorm_comp_measurePreserving {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g ν)
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) : snorm (g ∘ f) p μ = snorm g p ν :=
Eq.symm <| hf.map_eq ▸ snorm_map_measure (hf.map_eq ▸ hg) hf.aemeasurable
theorem AEEqFun.snorm_compMeasurePreserving {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} (g : β →ₘ[ν] E)
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) :
snorm (g.compMeasurePreserving f hf) p μ = snorm g p ν := by
rw [snorm_congr_ae (g.coeFn_compMeasurePreserving _)]
exact snorm_comp_measurePreserving g.aestronglyMeasurable hf
theorem Memℒp.comp_measurePreserving {ν : MeasureTheory.Measure β} (hg : Memℒp g p ν)
(hf : MeasurePreserving f μ ν) : Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
.comp_of_map (hf.map_eq.symm ▸ hg) hf.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.snormEssSup_map_measure {g : β → F}
(hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) : snormEssSup g (Measure.map f μ) = snormEssSup (g ∘ f) μ :=
hf.essSup_map_measure
#align measurable_embedding.snorm_ess_sup_map_measure MeasurableEmbedding.snormEssSup_map_measure
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.snorm_map_measure {g : β → F} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
snorm g p (Measure.map f μ) = snorm (g ∘ f) p μ := by
by_cases hp_zero : p = 0
· simp only [hp_zero, snorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp : p = ∞
· simp_rw [hp, snorm_exponent_top]
exact hf.essSup_map_measure
· simp_rw [snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp_zero hp]
rw [hf.lintegral_map]
rfl
#align measurable_embedding.snorm_map_measure MeasurableEmbedding.snorm_map_measure
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.memℒp_map_measure_iff {g : β → F} (hf : MeasurableEmbedding f) :
Memℒp g p (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ := by
simp_rw [Memℒp, hf.aestronglyMeasurable_map_iff, hf.snorm_map_measure]
#align measurable_embedding.mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff MeasurableEmbedding.memℒp_map_measure_iff
theorem _root_.MeasurableEquiv.memℒp_map_measure_iff (f : α ≃ᵐ β) {g : β → F} :
Memℒp g p (Measure.map f μ) ↔ Memℒp (g ∘ f) p μ :=
f.measurableEmbedding.memℒp_map_measure_iff
#align measurable_equiv.mem_ℒp_map_measure_iff MeasurableEquiv.memℒp_map_measure_iff
end MapMeasure
section Monotonicity
theorem snorm'_le_nnreal_smul_snorm'_of_ae_le_mul {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) : snorm' f p μ ≤ c • snorm' g p μ := by
simp_rw [snorm']
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff hp, ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp.le]
simp_rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, one_div, inv_mul_cancel hp.ne.symm, ENNReal.rpow_one,
ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hp.le, ← lintegral_const_mul' _ _ ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ←
ENNReal.coe_mul]
apply lintegral_mono_ae
simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_le_coe, ← NNReal.mul_rpow, NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff hp]
exact h
#align measure_theory.snorm'_le_nnreal_smul_snorm'_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.snorm'_le_nnreal_smul_snorm'_of_ae_le_mul
theorem snormEssSup_le_nnreal_smul_snormEssSup_of_ae_le_mul {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : snormEssSup f μ ≤ c • snormEssSup g μ :=
calc
essSup (fun x => (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ ≤ essSup (fun x => (↑(c * ‖g x‖₊) : ℝ≥0∞)) μ :=
essSup_mono_ae <| h.mono fun x hx => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.mpr hx
_ = essSup (fun x => (c * ‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ := by simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_mul]
_ = c • essSup (fun x => (‖g x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞)) μ := ENNReal.essSup_const_mul
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_ess_sup_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_le_nnreal_smul_snormEssSup_of_ae_le_mul
theorem snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ≥0}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) (p : ℝ≥0∞) : snorm f p μ ≤ c • snorm g p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· rw [h_top]
exact snormEssSup_le_nnreal_smul_snormEssSup_of_ae_le_mul h
simp_rw [snorm_eq_snorm' h0 h_top]
exact snorm'_le_nnreal_smul_snorm'_of_ae_le_mul h (ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top)
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul
-- TODO: add the whole family of lemmas?
private theorem le_mul_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg_of_neg_of_nonneg {α} [LinearOrderedSemiring α]
{a b c : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : b < 0) (hc : 0 ≤ c) : a ≤ b * c ↔ a = 0 ∧ c = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
exact
⟨(h.trans (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hb.le hc)).antisymm ha,
(nonpos_of_mul_nonneg_right (ha.trans h) hb).antisymm hc⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rw [mul_zero]
/-- When `c` is negative, `‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖` is nonsense and forces both `f` and `g` to have an
`snorm` of `0`. -/
theorem snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) (hc : c < 0) (p : ℝ≥0∞) :
snorm f p μ = 0 ∧ snorm g p μ = 0 := by
simp_rw [le_mul_iff_eq_zero_of_nonneg_of_neg_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) hc (norm_nonneg _),
norm_eq_zero, eventually_and] at h
change f =ᵐ[μ] 0 ∧ g =ᵐ[μ] 0 at h
simp [snorm_congr_ae h.1, snorm_congr_ae h.2]
#align measure_theory.snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg MeasureTheory.snorm_eq_zero_and_zero_of_ae_le_mul_neg
theorem snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul {f : α → F} {g : α → G} {c : ℝ}
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) (p : ℝ≥0∞) : snorm f p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal c * snorm g p μ :=
snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul
(h.mono fun _x hx => hx.trans <| mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right c.le_coe_toNNReal (norm_nonneg _)) _
#align measure_theory.snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul MeasureTheory.snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul
theorem Memℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {c : ℝ≥0} (hg : Memℒp g p μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖₊ ≤ c * ‖g x‖₊) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨hf,
(snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul hfg p).trans_lt <|
ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top hg.snorm_ne_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_nnnorm_le_mul
theorem Memℒp.of_le_mul {f : α → E} {g : α → F} {c : ℝ} (hg : Memℒp g p μ)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c * ‖g x‖) : Memℒp f p μ :=
⟨hf,
(snorm_le_mul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul hfg p).trans_lt <|
ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top hg.snorm_ne_top⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.of_le_mul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.of_le_mul
end Monotonicity
/-!
### Bounded actions by normed rings
In this section we show inequalities on the norm.
-/
section BoundedSMul
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedRing 𝕜] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 F]
variable [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 F]
theorem snorm'_const_smul_le (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (c • f) q μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ • snorm' f q μ :=
snorm'_le_nnreal_smul_snorm'_of_ae_le_mul (eventually_of_forall fun _ => nnnorm_smul_le _ _)
hq_pos
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const_smul_le MeasureTheory.snorm'_const_smul_le
theorem snormEssSup_const_smul_le (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F) :
snormEssSup (c • f) μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ • snormEssSup f μ :=
snormEssSup_le_nnreal_smul_snormEssSup_of_ae_le_mul
(eventually_of_forall fun _ => by simp [nnnorm_smul_le])
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_const_smul_le MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_const_smul_le
theorem snorm_const_smul_le (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F) : snorm (c • f) p μ ≤ ‖c‖₊ • snorm f p μ :=
snorm_le_nnreal_smul_snorm_of_ae_le_mul (eventually_of_forall fun _ => by simp [nnnorm_smul_le]) _
#align measure_theory.snorm_const_smul_le MeasureTheory.snorm_const_smul_le
theorem Memℒp.const_smul {f : α → E} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (c : 𝕜) : Memℒp (c • f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul hf.1 c,
(snorm_const_smul_le c f).trans_lt (ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_ne_top hf.2.ne)⟩
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.const_smul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.const_smul
theorem Memℒp.const_mul {R} [NormedRing R] {f : α → R} (hf : Memℒp f p μ) (c : R) :
Memℒp (fun x => c * f x) p μ :=
hf.const_smul c
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.const_mul MeasureTheory.Memℒp.const_mul
end BoundedSMul
/-!
### Bounded actions by normed division rings
The inequalities in the previous section are now tight.
-/
section NormedSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedDivisionRing 𝕜] [MulActionWithZero 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜 F]
variable [BoundedSMul 𝕜 E] [BoundedSMul 𝕜 F]
theorem snorm'_const_smul {f : α → F} (c : 𝕜) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
snorm' (c • f) q μ = ‖c‖₊ • snorm' f q μ := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· simp [snorm', hq_pos]
refine le_antisymm (snorm'_const_smul_le _ _ hq_pos) ?_
have : snorm' _ q μ ≤ _ := snorm'_const_smul_le c⁻¹ (c • f) hq_pos
rwa [inv_smul_smul₀ hc, nnnorm_inv, le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos (nnnorm_pos.2 hc)] at this
#align measure_theory.snorm'_const_smul MeasureTheory.snorm'_const_smul
theorem snormEssSup_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F) :
snormEssSup (c • f) μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * snormEssSup f μ := by
simp_rw [snormEssSup, Pi.smul_apply, nnnorm_smul, ENNReal.coe_mul, ENNReal.essSup_const_mul]
#align measure_theory.snorm_ess_sup_const_smul MeasureTheory.snormEssSup_const_smul
theorem snorm_const_smul (c : 𝕜) (f : α → F) :
snorm (c • f) p μ = (‖c‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) * snorm f p μ := by
obtain rfl | hc := eq_or_ne c 0
· simp
refine le_antisymm (snorm_const_smul_le _ _) ?_
have : snorm _ p μ ≤ _ := snorm_const_smul_le c⁻¹ (c • f)
rwa [inv_smul_smul₀ hc, nnnorm_inv, le_inv_smul_iff_of_pos (nnnorm_pos.2 hc)] at this
#align measure_theory.snorm_const_smul MeasureTheory.snorm_const_smul
end NormedSpace
theorem snorm_indicator_ge_of_bdd_below (hp : p ≠ 0) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : α → F} (C : ℝ≥0) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → C ≤ ‖s.indicator f x‖₊) :
C • μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ snorm (s.indicator f) p μ := by
rw [ENNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, snorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm hp hp',
ENNReal.le_rpow_one_div_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp'),
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
one_div_mul_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp').ne.symm, ENNReal.rpow_one, ← set_lintegral_const,
← lintegral_indicator _ hs]
refine lintegral_mono_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf] with x hx
rw [nnnorm_indicator_eq_indicator_nnnorm]
by_cases hxs : x ∈ s
· simp only [Set.indicator_of_mem hxs] at hx ⊢
gcongr
exact hx hxs
· simp [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hxs]
#align measure_theory.snorm_indicator_ge_of_bdd_below MeasureTheory.snorm_indicator_ge_of_bdd_below
section RCLike
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {f : α → 𝕜}
theorem Memℒp.re (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (fun x => RCLike.re (f x)) p μ := by
have : ∀ x, ‖RCLike.re (f x)‖ ≤ 1 * ‖f x‖ := by
intro x
rw [one_mul]
exact RCLike.norm_re_le_norm (f x)
refine hf.of_le_mul ?_ (eventually_of_forall this)
exact RCLike.continuous_re.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hf.1
#align measure_theory.mem_ℒp.re MeasureTheory.Memℒp.re
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 1,047 | 1,053 | theorem Memℒp.im (hf : Memℒp f p μ) : Memℒp (fun x => RCLike.im (f x)) p μ := by |
have : ∀ x, ‖RCLike.im (f x)‖ ≤ 1 * ‖f x‖ := by
intro x
rw [one_mul]
exact RCLike.norm_im_le_norm (f x)
refine hf.of_le_mul ?_ (eventually_of_forall this)
exact RCLike.continuous_im.comp_aestronglyMeasurable hf.1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jujian Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Jujian Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Liouville.Basic
#align_import number_theory.liouville.liouville_number from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"04e80bb7e8510958cd9aacd32fe2dc147af0b9f1"
/-!
# Liouville constants
This file contains a construction of a family of Liouville numbers, indexed by a natural number $m$.
The most important property is that they are examples of transcendental real numbers.
This fact is recorded in `transcendental_liouvilleNumber`.
More precisely, for a real number $m$, Liouville's constant is
$$
\sum_{i=0}^\infty\frac{1}{m^{i!}}.
$$
The series converges only for $1 < m$. However, there is no restriction on $m$, since,
if the series does not converge, then the sum of the series is defined to be zero.
We prove that, for $m \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $2 \le m$, Liouville's constant associated to $m$
is a transcendental number. Classically, the Liouville number for $m = 2$ is the one called
``Liouville's constant''.
## Implementation notes
The indexing $m$ is eventually a natural number satisfying $2 ≤ m$. However, we prove the first few
lemmas for $m \in \mathbb{R}$.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat
open Real Finset
/-- For a real number `m`, Liouville's constant is
$$
\sum_{i=0}^\infty\frac{1}{m^{i!}}.
$$
The series converges only for `1 < m`. However, there is no restriction on `m`, since,
if the series does not converge, then the sum of the series is defined to be zero.
-/
def liouvilleNumber (m : ℝ) : ℝ :=
∑' i : ℕ, 1 / m ^ i !
#align liouville_number liouvilleNumber
namespace LiouvilleNumber
/-- `LiouvilleNumber.partialSum` is the sum of the first `k + 1` terms of Liouville's constant,
i.e.
$$
\sum_{i=0}^k\frac{1}{m^{i!}}.
$$
-/
def partialSum (m : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : ℝ :=
∑ i ∈ range (k + 1), 1 / m ^ i !
#align liouville_number.partial_sum LiouvilleNumber.partialSum
/-- `LiouvilleNumber.remainder` is the sum of the series of the terms in `liouvilleNumber m`
starting from `k+1`, i.e
$$
\sum_{i=k+1}^\infty\frac{1}{m^{i!}}.
$$
-/
def remainder (m : ℝ) (k : ℕ) : ℝ :=
∑' i, 1 / m ^ (i + (k + 1))!
#align liouville_number.remainder LiouvilleNumber.remainder
/-!
We start with simple observations.
-/
protected theorem summable {m : ℝ} (hm : 1 < m) : Summable fun i : ℕ => 1 / m ^ i ! :=
summable_one_div_pow_of_le hm Nat.self_le_factorial
#align liouville_number.summable LiouvilleNumber.summable
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Liouville/LiouvilleNumber.lean | 84 | 86 | theorem remainder_summable {m : ℝ} (hm : 1 < m) (k : ℕ) :
Summable fun i : ℕ => 1 / m ^ (i + (k + 1))! := by |
convert (summable_nat_add_iff (k + 1)).2 (LiouvilleNumber.summable hm)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
#align_import measure_theory.measure.measure_space from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"343e80208d29d2d15f8050b929aa50fe4ce71b55"
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace
open scoped Classical symmDiff
open Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.ae_is_measurably_generated MeasureTheory.ae_isMeasurablyGenerated
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
#align measure_theory.ae_uIoc_iff MeasureTheory.ae_uIoc_iff
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union MeasureTheory.measure_union
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
#align measure_theory.measure_union' MeasureTheory.measure_union'
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_inter_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_inter_add_diff
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_diff_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_union_add_inter' MeasureTheory.measure_union_add_inter'
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union] using measure_union disjoint_sdiff_sdiff (ht.diff hs)
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_add_measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_add_measure_compl
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion₀
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion₀ MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion₀
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
#align measure_theory.measure_sUnion MeasureTheory.measure_sUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset₀ MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset₀
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_finset MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_finset
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
#align measure_theory.tsum_meas_le_meas_Union_of_disjoint MeasureTheory.tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_preimage_singleton
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton MeasureTheory.sum_measure_preimage_singleton
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_null' MeasureTheory.measure_diff_null'
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) : μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union' disjoint_sdiff_right hs, union_diff_self]
#align measure_theory.measure_add_diff MeasureTheory.measure_add_diff
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : MeasurableSet t) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
Eq.symm <| ENNReal.sub_eq_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff' MeasureTheory.measure_diff'
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : MeasurableSet s₂) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff MeasureTheory.measure_diff
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
#align measure_theory.le_measure_diff MeasureTheory.le_measure_diff
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := (WithTop.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩).symm
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} :
μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
#align measure_theory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add MeasureTheory.measure_diff_le_iff_le_add
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
#align measure_theory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff MeasureTheory.measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
#align measure_theory.measure_compl MeasureTheory.measure_compl
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
#align measure_theory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset MeasureTheory.union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
#align measure_theory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge MeasureTheory.ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset [Countable β] {s : β → Set α} {t : β → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ b, s b ⊆ t b) (h_le : ∀ b, μ (t b) ≤ μ (s b)) : μ (⋃ b, s b) = μ (⋃ b, t b) := by
rcases Classical.em (∃ b, μ (t b) = ∞) with (⟨b, hb⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ b, s b) = ∞ := top_unique (hb ▸ (h_le b).trans <| measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, t b) := Eq.symm <| top_unique <| hb ▸ measure_mono (subset_iUnion _ _)
push_neg at htop
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono (iUnion_mono hsub)) ?_
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
#align measure_theory.measure_union_congr_of_subset MeasureTheory.measure_union_congr_of_subset
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable [Countable β] (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b, s b) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _b => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _b =>
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_toMeasurable
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_toMeasurable
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
#align measure_theory.measure_to_measurable_union MeasureTheory.measure_toMeasurable_union
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
#align measure_theory.measure_union_to_measurable MeasureTheory.measure_union_toMeasurable
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i)) (H : Set.PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) t) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
#align measure_theory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.sum_measure_le_measure_univ
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : Pairwise (Disjoint on s)) : (∑' i, μ (s i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
#align measure_theory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ MeasureTheory.tsum_measure_le_measure_univ
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, MeasurableSet (t i))
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)
#align measure_theory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure MeasureTheory.exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
#align measure_theory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' MeasureTheory.nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily
-measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases nonempty_encodable ι
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
generalize ht : Function.extend Encodable.encode s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion,
iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective, (· ∘ ·), Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty,
measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot Encodable.encode_injective _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i => measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) :=
MeasurableSet.disjointed fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) ≤ μ (⋃ n, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun i => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
#align measure_theory.measure_Union_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_iUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} : μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
have hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) (Accumulate f) := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rli ↦ le_trans rli rik,
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left fun l rlj ↦ le_trans rlj rjk⟩
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hd.directed_val, ← iSup_subtype'']
#align measure_theory.measure_bUnion_eq_supr MeasureTheory.measure_biUnion_eq_iSup
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i))
(hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le _ k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (MeasurableSet.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, measure_iUnion_eq_iSup]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => ?_)
· rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· rw [tsub_le_iff_right, ← measure_union, Set.union_comm]
· exact measure_mono (diff_subset_iff.1 Subset.rfl)
· apply disjoint_sdiff_left
· apply h i
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
#align measure_theory.measure_Inter_eq_infi MeasureTheory.measure_iInter_eq_iInf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
let s := fun i ↦ ⋂ j ≤ i, f j
have iInter_eq : ⋂ i, f i = ⋂ i, s i := by
ext x; simp [s]; constructor
· exact fun h _ j _ ↦ h j
· intro h i
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact h j i rij
have ms : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (s i) :=
fun i ↦ MeasurableSet.biInter (countable_univ.mono <| subset_univ _) fun i _ ↦ h i
have hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s := by
intro i j
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i j with ⟨k, rik, rjk⟩
exact ⟨k, biInter_subset_biInter_left fun j rji ↦ le_trans rji rik,
biInter_subset_biInter_left fun i rij ↦ le_trans rij rjk⟩
have hfin' : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞ := by
rcases hfin with ⟨i, hi⟩
rcases directed_of (· ≤ ·) i i with ⟨j, rij, -⟩
exact ⟨j, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hi <| measure_mono <| biInter_subset_of_mem rij⟩
exact iInter_eq ▸ measure_iInter_eq_iInf ms hd hfin'
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] [Countable ι]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup hm.directed_le]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Union MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup']
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (s n)) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf hs hm.directed_ge hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
#align measure_theory.tendsto_measure_Inter MeasureTheory.tendsto_measure_iInter
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 600 | 606 | theorem tendsto_measure_iInter' {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [Countable ι]
[Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i))
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ∈ {j | j ≤ i}, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by |
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf' hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.AffineScheme
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Topology.Sheaves.SheafCondition.Sites
import Mathlib.Algebra.Category.Ring.Constructions
import Mathlib.RingTheory.LocalProperties
#align_import algebraic_geometry.properties from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"88474d1b5af6d37c2ab728b757771bced7f5194c"
/-!
# Basic properties of schemes
We provide some basic properties of schemes
## Main definition
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsIntegral`: A scheme is integral if it is nontrivial and all nontrivial
components of the structure sheaf are integral domains.
* `AlgebraicGeometry.IsReduced`: A scheme is reduced if all the components of the structure sheaf
are reduced.
-/
-- Explicit universe annotations were used in this file to improve perfomance #12737
universe u
open TopologicalSpace Opposite CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Limits TopCat
namespace AlgebraicGeometry
variable (X : Scheme)
instance : T0Space X.carrier := by
refine T0Space.of_open_cover fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨U, R, ⟨e⟩⟩ := X.local_affine x
let e' : U.1 ≃ₜ PrimeSpectrum R :=
homeoOfIso ((LocallyRingedSpace.forgetToSheafedSpace ⋙ SheafedSpace.forget _).mapIso e)
exact ⟨U.1.1, U.2, U.1.2, e'.embedding.t0Space⟩
instance : QuasiSober X.carrier := by
apply (config := { allowSynthFailures := true })
quasiSober_of_open_cover (Set.range fun x => Set.range <| (X.affineCover.map x).1.base)
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩; exact (X.affineCover.IsOpen i).base_open.isOpen_range
· rintro ⟨_, i, rfl⟩
exact @OpenEmbedding.quasiSober _ _ _ _ _ (Homeomorph.ofEmbedding _
(X.affineCover.IsOpen i).base_open.toEmbedding).symm.openEmbedding PrimeSpectrum.quasiSober
· rw [Set.top_eq_univ, Set.sUnion_range, Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
intro x; exact ⟨_, ⟨_, rfl⟩, X.affineCover.Covers x⟩
/-- A scheme `X` is reduced if all `𝒪ₓ(U)` are reduced. -/
class IsReduced : Prop where
component_reduced : ∀ U, IsReduced (X.presheaf.obj (op U)) := by infer_instance
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.IsReduced
attribute [instance] IsReduced.component_reduced
theorem isReducedOfStalkIsReduced [∀ x : X.carrier, _root_.IsReduced (X.presheaf.stalk x)] :
IsReduced X := by
refine ⟨fun U => ⟨fun s hs => ?_⟩⟩
apply Presheaf.section_ext X.sheaf U s 0
intro x
rw [RingHom.map_zero]
change X.presheaf.germ x s = 0
exact (hs.map _).eq_zero
#align algebraic_geometry.is_reduced_of_stalk_is_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.isReducedOfStalkIsReduced
instance stalk_isReduced_of_reduced [IsReduced X] (x : X.carrier) :
_root_.IsReduced (X.presheaf.stalk x) := by
constructor
rintro g ⟨n, e⟩
obtain ⟨U, hxU, s, rfl⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_exist x g
rw [← map_pow, ← map_zero (X.presheaf.germ ⟨x, hxU⟩)] at e
obtain ⟨V, hxV, iU, iV, e'⟩ := X.presheaf.germ_eq x hxU hxU _ 0 e
rw [map_pow, map_zero] at e'
replace e' := (IsNilpotent.mk _ _ e').eq_zero (R := X.presheaf.obj <| op V)
erw [← ConcreteCategory.congr_hom (X.presheaf.germ_res iU ⟨x, hxV⟩) s]
rw [comp_apply, e', map_zero]
#align algebraic_geometry.stalk_is_reduced_of_reduced AlgebraicGeometry.stalk_isReduced_of_reduced
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/Properties.lean | 84 | 93 | theorem isReducedOfOpenImmersion {X Y : Scheme} (f : X ⟶ Y) [H : IsOpenImmersion f]
[IsReduced Y] : IsReduced X := by |
constructor
intro U
have : U = (Opens.map f.1.base).obj (H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) := by
ext1; exact (Set.preimage_image_eq _ H.base_open.inj).symm
rw [this]
exact isReduced_of_injective (inv <| f.1.c.app (op <| H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U))
(asIso <| f.1.c.app (op <| H.base_open.isOpenMap.functor.obj U) :
Y.presheaf.obj _ ≅ _).symm.commRingCatIsoToRingEquiv.injective
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Scott Morrison, Ainsley Pahljina
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Nat
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Fintype
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
#align_import number_theory.lucas_lehmer from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"10b4e499f43088dd3bb7b5796184ad5216648ab1"
/-!
# The Lucas-Lehmer test for Mersenne primes.
We define `lucasLehmerResidue : Π p : ℕ, ZMod (2^p - 1)`, and
prove `lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 → Prime (mersenne p)`.
We construct a `norm_num` extension to calculate this residue to certify primality of Mersenne
primes using `lucas_lehmer_sufficiency`.
## TODO
- Show reverse implication.
- Speed up the calculations using `n ≡ (n % 2^p) + (n / 2^p) [MOD 2^p - 1]`.
- Find some bigger primes!
## History
This development began as a student project by Ainsley Pahljina,
and was then cleaned up for mathlib by Scott Morrison.
The tactic for certified computation of Lucas-Lehmer residues was provided by Mario Carneiro.
This tactic was ported by Thomas Murrills to Lean 4, and then it was converted to a `norm_num`
extension and made to use kernel reductions by Kyle Miller.
-/
/-- The Mersenne numbers, 2^p - 1. -/
def mersenne (p : ℕ) : ℕ :=
2 ^ p - 1
#align mersenne mersenne
theorem strictMono_mersenne : StrictMono mersenne := fun m n h ↦
(Nat.sub_lt_sub_iff_right <| Nat.one_le_pow _ _ two_pos).2 <| by gcongr; norm_num1
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_lt_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p < mersenne q ↔ p < q :=
strictMono_mersenne.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_lt_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_lt_mersenne
@[simp]
theorem mersenne_le_mersenne {p q : ℕ} : mersenne p ≤ mersenne q ↔ p ≤ q :=
strictMono_mersenne.le_iff_le
@[gcongr] protected alias ⟨_, GCongr.mersenne_le_mersenne⟩ := mersenne_le_mersenne
@[simp] theorem mersenne_zero : mersenne 0 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem mersenne_pos {p : ℕ} : 0 < mersenne p ↔ 0 < p := mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 0)
#align mersenne_pos mersenne_pos
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
alias ⟨_, mersenne_pos_of_pos⟩ := mersenne_pos
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `mersenne`. -/
@[positivity mersenne _]
def evalMersenne : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℕ), ~q(mersenne $a) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa => pure (.positive q(mersenne_pos_of_pos $pa))
| _ => pure (.nonnegative q(Nat.zero_le (mersenne $a)))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not mersenne"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_mersenne {p : ℕ} : 1 < mersenne p ↔ 1 < p :=
mersenne_lt_mersenne (p := 1)
@[simp]
theorem succ_mersenne (k : ℕ) : mersenne k + 1 = 2 ^ k := by
rw [mersenne, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact one_le_pow_of_one_le (by norm_num) k
#align succ_mersenne succ_mersenne
namespace LucasLehmer
open Nat
/-!
We now define three(!) different versions of the recurrence
`s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2`.
These versions take values either in `ℤ`, in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`, or
in `ℤ` but applying `% (2^p - 1)` at each step.
They are each useful at different points in the proof,
so we take a moment setting up the lemmas relating them.
-/
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ℤ`. -/
def s : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => s i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s LucasLehmer.s
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = (s i)^2 - 2` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def sZMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)
| 0 => 4
| i + 1 => sZMod p i ^ 2 - 2
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod LucasLehmer.sZMod
/-- The recurrence `s (i+1) = ((s i)^2 - 2) % (2^p - 1)` in `ℤ`. -/
def sMod (p : ℕ) : ℕ → ℤ
| 0 => 4 % (2 ^ p - 1)
| i + 1 => (sMod p i ^ 2 - 2) % (2 ^ p - 1)
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod LucasLehmer.sMod
theorem mersenne_int_pos {p : ℕ} (hp : p ≠ 0) : (0 : ℤ) < 2 ^ p - 1 :=
sub_pos.2 <| mod_cast Nat.one_lt_two_pow hp
theorem mersenne_int_ne_zero (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) ≠ 0 :=
(mersenne_int_pos hp).ne'
#align lucas_lehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero LucasLehmer.mersenne_int_ne_zero
theorem sMod_nonneg (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : 0 ≤ sMod p i := by
cases i <;> dsimp [sMod]
· exact sup_eq_right.mp rfl
· apply Int.emod_nonneg
exact mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_nonneg LucasLehmer.sMod_nonneg
theorem sMod_mod (p i : ℕ) : sMod p i % (2 ^ p - 1) = sMod p i := by cases i <;> simp [sMod]
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_mod LucasLehmer.sMod_mod
theorem sMod_lt (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 0) (i : ℕ) : sMod p i < 2 ^ p - 1 := by
rw [← sMod_mod]
refine (Int.emod_lt _ (mersenne_int_ne_zero p hp)).trans_eq ?_
exact abs_of_nonneg (mersenne_int_pos hp).le
#align lucas_lehmer.s_mod_lt LucasLehmer.sMod_lt
theorem sZMod_eq_s (p' : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod (p' + 2) i = (s i : ZMod (2 ^ (p' + 2) - 1)) := by
induction' i with i ih
· dsimp [s, sZMod]
norm_num
· push_cast [s, sZMod, ih]; rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod_eq_s LucasLehmer.sZMod_eq_s
-- These next two don't make good `norm_cast` lemmas.
theorem Int.natCast_pow_pred (b p : ℕ) (w : 0 < b) : ((b ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (b : ℤ) ^ p - 1 := by
have : 1 ≤ b ^ p := Nat.one_le_pow p b w
norm_cast
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.natCast_pow_pred
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias Int.coe_nat_pow_pred := Int.natCast_pow_pred
theorem Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred (p : ℕ) : ((2 ^ p - 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) = (2 ^ p - 1 : ℤ) :=
Int.natCast_pow_pred 2 p (by decide)
#align lucas_lehmer.int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred LucasLehmer.Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred
theorem sZMod_eq_sMod (p : ℕ) (i : ℕ) : sZMod p i = (sMod p i : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1)) := by
induction i <;> push_cast [← Int.coe_nat_two_pow_pred p, sMod, sZMod, *] <;> rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.s_zmod_eq_s_mod LucasLehmer.sZMod_eq_sMod
/-- The Lucas-Lehmer residue is `s p (p-2)` in `ZMod (2^p - 1)`. -/
def lucasLehmerResidue (p : ℕ) : ZMod (2 ^ p - 1) :=
sZMod p (p - 2)
#align lucas_lehmer.lucas_lehmer_residue LucasLehmer.lucasLehmerResidue
theorem residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero (p : ℕ) (w : 1 < p) :
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0 ↔ sMod p (p - 2) = 0 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue]
rw [sZMod_eq_sMod p]
constructor
· -- We want to use that fact that `0 ≤ s_mod p (p-2) < 2^p - 1`
-- and `lucas_lehmer_residue p = 0 → 2^p - 1 ∣ s_mod p (p-2)`.
intro h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, gt_iff_lt, ofNat_pos, pow_pos, cast_pred,
cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
apply Int.eq_zero_of_dvd_of_nonneg_of_lt _ _ h <;> clear h
· exact sMod_nonneg _ (by positivity) _
· exact sMod_lt _ (by positivity) _
· intro h
rw [h]
simp
#align lucas_lehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_s_mod_eq_zero LucasLehmer.residue_eq_zero_iff_sMod_eq_zero
/-- **Lucas-Lehmer Test**: a Mersenne number `2^p-1` is prime if and only if
the Lucas-Lehmer residue `s p (p-2) % (2^p - 1)` is zero.
-/
def LucasLehmerTest (p : ℕ) : Prop :=
lucasLehmerResidue p = 0
#align lucas_lehmer.lucas_lehmer_test LucasLehmer.LucasLehmerTest
-- Porting note: We have a fast `norm_num` extension, and we would rather use that than accidentally
-- have `simp` use `decide`!
/-
instance : DecidablePred LucasLehmerTest :=
inferInstanceAs (DecidablePred (lucasLehmerResidue · = 0))
-/
/-- `q` is defined as the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, bundled as an `ℕ+`. -/
def q (p : ℕ) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.minFac (mersenne p), Nat.minFac_pos (mersenne p)⟩
#align lucas_lehmer.q LucasLehmer.q
-- It would be nice to define this as (ℤ/qℤ)[x] / (x^2 - 3),
-- obtaining the ring structure for free,
-- but that seems to be more trouble than it's worth;
-- if it were easy to make the definition,
-- cardinality calculations would be somewhat more involved, too.
/-- We construct the ring `X q` as ℤ/qℤ + √3 ℤ/qℤ. -/
def X (q : ℕ+) : Type :=
ZMod q × ZMod q
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X LucasLehmer.X
namespace X
variable {q : ℕ+}
instance : Inhabited (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : Fintype (X q) := inferInstanceAs (Fintype (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : DecidableEq (X q) := inferInstanceAs (DecidableEq (ZMod q × ZMod q))
instance : AddCommGroup (X q) := inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (ZMod q × ZMod q))
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : X q} (h₁ : x.1 = y.1) (h₂ : x.2 = y.2) : x = y := by
cases x; cases y; congr
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.ext LucasLehmer.X.ext
@[simp] theorem zero_fst : (0 : X q).1 = 0 := rfl
@[simp] theorem zero_snd : (0 : X q).2 = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_fst (x y : X q) : (x + y).1 = x.1 + y.1 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.add_fst LucasLehmer.X.add_fst
@[simp]
theorem add_snd (x y : X q) : (x + y).2 = x.2 + y.2 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.add_snd LucasLehmer.X.add_snd
@[simp]
theorem neg_fst (x : X q) : (-x).1 = -x.1 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.neg_fst LucasLehmer.X.neg_fst
@[simp]
theorem neg_snd (x : X q) : (-x).2 = -x.2 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.neg_snd LucasLehmer.X.neg_snd
instance : Mul (X q) where mul x y := (x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2, x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1)
@[simp]
theorem mul_fst (x y : X q) : (x * y).1 = x.1 * y.1 + 3 * x.2 * y.2 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.mul_fst LucasLehmer.X.mul_fst
@[simp]
theorem mul_snd (x y : X q) : (x * y).2 = x.1 * y.2 + x.2 * y.1 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.mul_snd LucasLehmer.X.mul_snd
instance : One (X q) where one := ⟨1, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_fst : (1 : X q).1 = 1 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.one_fst LucasLehmer.X.one_fst
@[simp]
theorem one_snd : (1 : X q).2 = 0 :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.one_snd LucasLehmer.X.one_snd
#noalign lucas_lehmer.X.bit0_fst
#noalign lucas_lehmer.X.bit0_snd
#noalign lucas_lehmer.X.bit1_fst
#noalign lucas_lehmer.X.bit1_snd
instance : Monoid (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Mul (X q)), inferInstanceAs (One (X q)) with
mul_assoc := fun x y z => by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
one_mul := fun x => by ext <;> simp
mul_one := fun x => by ext <;> simp }
instance : NatCast (X q) where
natCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
@[simp] theorem fst_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.nat_coe_fst LucasLehmer.X.fst_natCast
@[simp] theorem snd_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) := rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.nat_coe_snd LucasLehmer.X.snd_natCast
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem ofNat_fst (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : X q).fst = OfNat.ofNat n :=
rfl
-- See note [no_index around OfNat.ofNat]
@[simp] theorem ofNat_snd (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : X q).snd = 0 :=
rfl
instance : AddGroupWithOne (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (NatCast (X q)) with
natCast_zero := by ext <;> simp
natCast_succ := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
intCast := fun n => ⟨n, 0⟩
intCast_ofNat := fun n => by ext <;> simp
intCast_negSucc := fun n => by ext <;> simp }
theorem left_distrib (x y z : X q) : x * (y + z) = x * y + x * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.left_distrib LucasLehmer.X.left_distrib
theorem right_distrib (x y z : X q) : (x + y) * z = x * z + y * z := by
ext <;> dsimp <;> ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.right_distrib LucasLehmer.X.right_distrib
instance : Ring (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (AddGroupWithOne (X q)), inferInstanceAs (AddCommGroup (X q)),
inferInstanceAs (Monoid (X q)) with
left_distrib := left_distrib
right_distrib := right_distrib
mul_zero := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp
zero_mul := fun _ ↦ by ext <;> simp }
instance : CommRing (X q) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (Ring (X q)) with
mul_comm := fun _ _ ↦ by ext <;> dsimp <;> ring }
instance [Fact (1 < (q : ℕ))] : Nontrivial (X q) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, ne_of_apply_ne Prod.fst zero_ne_one⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem fst_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).fst = (n : ZMod q) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.int_coe_fst LucasLehmer.X.fst_intCast
@[simp]
theorem snd_intCast (n : ℤ) : (n : X q).snd = (0 : ZMod q) :=
rfl
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.int_coe_snd LucasLehmer.X.snd_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias nat_coe_fst := fst_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias nat_coe_snd := snd_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_fst := fst_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_snd := snd_intCast
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul (n m : ℤ) : ((n * m : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) * (m : X q) := by ext <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.coe_mul LucasLehmer.X.coe_mul
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : X q) = (n : X q) := by ext <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.coe_nat LucasLehmer.X.coe_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-05")] alias coe_nat := coe_natCast
/-- The cardinality of `X` is `q^2`. -/
theorem card_eq : Fintype.card (X q) = q ^ 2 := by
dsimp [X]
rw [Fintype.card_prod, ZMod.card q, sq]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.X_card LucasLehmer.X.card_eq
/-- There are strictly fewer than `q^2` units, since `0` is not a unit. -/
nonrec theorem card_units_lt (w : 1 < q) : Fintype.card (X q)ˣ < q ^ 2 := by
have : Fact (1 < (q : ℕ)) := ⟨w⟩
convert card_units_lt (X q)
rw [card_eq]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.units_card LucasLehmer.X.card_units_lt
/-- We define `ω = 2 + √3`. -/
def ω : X q := (2, 1)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.ω LucasLehmer.X.ω
/-- We define `ωb = 2 - √3`, which is the inverse of `ω`. -/
def ωb : X q := (2, -1)
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.ωb LucasLehmer.X.ωb
theorem ω_mul_ωb (q : ℕ+) : (ω : X q) * ωb = 1 := by
dsimp [ω, ωb]
ext <;> simp; ring
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.ω_mul_ωb LucasLehmer.X.ω_mul_ωb
theorem ωb_mul_ω (q : ℕ+) : (ωb : X q) * ω = 1 := by
rw [mul_comm, ω_mul_ωb]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.ωb_mul_ω LucasLehmer.X.ωb_mul_ω
/-- A closed form for the recurrence relation. -/
theorem closed_form (i : ℕ) : (s i : X q) = (ω : X q) ^ 2 ^ i + (ωb : X q) ^ 2 ^ i := by
induction' i with i ih
· dsimp [s, ω, ωb]
ext <;> norm_num
· calc
(s (i + 1) : X q) = (s i ^ 2 - 2 : ℤ) := rfl
_ = (s i : X q) ^ 2 - 2 := by push_cast; rfl
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i + ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 - 2 := by rw [ih]
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + 2 * (ωb ^ 2 ^ i * ω ^ 2 ^ i) - 2 := by ring
_ = (ω ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 + (ωb ^ 2 ^ i) ^ 2 := by
rw [← mul_pow ωb ω, ωb_mul_ω, one_pow, mul_one, add_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ω ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) + ωb ^ 2 ^ (i + 1) := by rw [← pow_mul, ← pow_mul, _root_.pow_succ]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.X.closed_form LucasLehmer.X.closed_form
end X
open X
/-!
Here and below, we introduce `p' = p - 2`, in order to avoid using subtraction in `ℕ`.
-/
/-- If `1 < p`, then `q p`, the smallest prime factor of `mersenne p`, is more than 2. -/
theorem two_lt_q (p' : ℕ) : 2 < q (p' + 2) := by
refine (minFac_prime (one_lt_mersenne.2 ?_).ne').two_le.lt_of_ne' ?_
· exact le_add_left _ _
· rw [Ne, minFac_eq_two_iff, mersenne, Nat.pow_succ']
exact Nat.two_not_dvd_two_mul_sub_one Nat.one_le_two_pow
#align lucas_lehmer.two_lt_q LucasLehmer.two_lt_q
theorem ω_pow_formula (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
∃ k : ℤ,
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) =
k * mersenne (p' + 2) * (ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ p' - 1 := by
dsimp [lucasLehmerResidue] at h
rw [sZMod_eq_s p'] at h
simp? [ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd] at h says
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_right, ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, gt_iff_lt, ofNat_pos,
pow_pos, cast_pred, cast_pow, cast_ofNat] at h
cases' h with k h
use k
replace h := congr_arg (fun n : ℤ => (n : X (q (p' + 2)))) h
-- coercion from ℤ to X q
dsimp at h
rw [closed_form] at h
replace h := congr_arg (fun x => ω ^ 2 ^ p' * x) h
dsimp at h
have t : 2 ^ p' + 2 ^ p' = 2 ^ (p' + 1) := by ring
rw [mul_add, ← pow_add ω, t, ← mul_pow ω ωb (2 ^ p'), ω_mul_ωb, one_pow] at h
rw [mul_comm, coe_mul] at h
rw [mul_comm _ (k : X (q (p' + 2)))] at h
replace h := eq_sub_of_add_eq h
have : 1 ≤ 2 ^ (p' + 2) := Nat.one_le_pow _ _ (by decide)
exact mod_cast h
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_pow_formula LucasLehmer.ω_pow_formula
/-- `q` is the minimum factor of `mersenne p`, so `M p = 0` in `X q`. -/
theorem mersenne_coe_X (p : ℕ) : (mersenne p : X (q p)) = 0 := by
ext <;> simp [mersenne, q, ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd, -pow_pos]
apply Nat.minFac_dvd
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align lucas_lehmer.mersenne_coe_X LucasLehmer.mersenne_coe_X
theorem ω_pow_eq_neg_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1) = -1 := by
cases' ω_pow_formula p' h with k w
rw [mersenne_coe_X] at w
simpa using w
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_pow_eq_neg_one LucasLehmer.ω_pow_eq_neg_one
theorem ω_pow_eq_one (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = 1 :=
calc
(ω : X (q (p' + 2))) ^ 2 ^ (p' + 2) = (ω ^ 2 ^ (p' + 1)) ^ 2 := by
rw [← pow_mul, ← Nat.pow_succ]
_ = (-1) ^ 2 := by rw [ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h]
_ = 1 := by simp
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_pow_eq_one LucasLehmer.ω_pow_eq_one
/-- `ω` as an element of the group of units. -/
def ωUnit (p : ℕ) : Units (X (q p)) where
val := ω
inv := ωb
val_inv := ω_mul_ωb _
inv_val := ωb_mul_ω _
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_unit LucasLehmer.ωUnit
@[simp]
theorem ωUnit_coe (p : ℕ) : (ωUnit p : X (q p)) = ω :=
rfl
#align lucas_lehmer.ω_unit_coe LucasLehmer.ωUnit_coe
/-- The order of `ω` in the unit group is exactly `2^p`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LucasLehmer.lean | 527 | 544 | theorem order_ω (p' : ℕ) (h : lucasLehmerResidue (p' + 2) = 0) :
orderOf (ωUnit (p' + 2)) = 2 ^ (p' + 2) := by |
apply Nat.eq_prime_pow_of_dvd_least_prime_pow
-- the order of ω divides 2^p
· exact Nat.prime_two
· intro o
have ω_pow := orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.1 o
replace ω_pow :=
congr_arg (Units.coeHom (X (q (p' + 2))) : Units (X (q (p' + 2))) → X (q (p' + 2))) ω_pow
simp? at ω_pow says simp only [map_pow, Units.coeHom_apply, ωUnit_coe, map_one] at ω_pow
have h : (1 : ZMod (q (p' + 2))) = -1 :=
congr_arg Prod.fst (ω_pow.symm.trans (ω_pow_eq_neg_one p' h))
haveI : Fact (2 < (q (p' + 2) : ℕ)) := ⟨two_lt_q _⟩
apply ZMod.neg_one_ne_one h.symm
· apply orderOf_dvd_iff_pow_eq_one.2
apply Units.ext
push_cast
exact ω_pow_eq_one p' h
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
#align_import data.real.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"cb42593171ba005beaaf4549fcfe0dece9ada4c9"
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset
assert_not_exists Module
assert_not_exists Submonoid
assert_not_exists FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
#align real Real
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
-- Porting note: unknown attribute
-- attribute [pp_using_anonymous_constructor] Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
#align cau_seq.completion.of_rat_rat CauSeq.Completion.ofRat_rat
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x y : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
#align real.ext_cauchy_iff Real.ext_cauchy_iff
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
#align real.ext_cauchy Real.ext_cauchy
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align real.equiv_Cauchy Real.equivCauchy
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
#align real.of_cauchy_zero Real.ofCauchy_zero
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
#align real.of_cauchy_one Real.ofCauchy_one
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
#align real.of_cauchy_add Real.ofCauchy_add
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
#align real.of_cauchy_neg Real.ofCauchy_neg
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 130 | 132 | theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by |
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.DirectSum.Internal
import Mathlib.Algebra.GradedMonoid
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Equiv
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
import Mathlib.RingTheory.MvPolynomial.WeightedHomogeneous
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Roots
#align_import ring_theory.mv_polynomial.homogeneous from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2f5b500a507264de86d666a5f87ddb976e2d8de4"
/-!
# Homogeneous polynomials
A multivariate polynomial `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`
if all monomials occurring in `φ` have degree `n`.
## Main definitions/lemmas
* `IsHomogeneous φ n`: a predicate that asserts that `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`.
* `homogeneousSubmodule σ R n`: the submodule of homogeneous polynomials of degree `n`.
* `homogeneousComponent n`: the additive morphism that projects polynomials onto
their summand that is homogeneous of degree `n`.
* `sum_homogeneousComponent`: every polynomial is the sum of its homogeneous components.
-/
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*} {R : Type*} {S : Type*}
/-
TODO
* show that `MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] ⨁ i, homogeneousSubmodule σ R i`
-/
/-- The degree of a monomial. -/
def degree (d : σ →₀ ℕ) := ∑ i ∈ d.support, d i
theorem weightedDegree_one (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
weightedDegree 1 d = degree d := by
simp [weightedDegree, degree, Finsupp.total, Finsupp.sum]
/-- A multivariate polynomial `φ` is homogeneous of degree `n`
if all monomials occurring in `φ` have degree `n`. -/
def IsHomogeneous [CommSemiring R] (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :=
IsWeightedHomogeneous 1 φ n
#align mv_polynomial.is_homogeneous MvPolynomial.IsHomogeneous
variable [CommSemiring R]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/MvPolynomial/Homogeneous.lean | 57 | 61 | theorem weightedTotalDegree_one (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
weightedTotalDegree (1 : σ → ℕ) φ = φ.totalDegree := by |
simp only [totalDegree, weightedTotalDegree, weightedDegree, LinearMap.toAddMonoidHom_coe,
Finsupp.total, Pi.one_apply, Finsupp.coe_lsum, LinearMap.coe_smulRight, LinearMap.id_coe,
id, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import linear_algebra.affine_space.combination from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2de9c37fa71dde2f1c6feff19876dd6a7b1519f0"
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
#align finset.univ_fin2 Finset.univ_fin2
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_apply_const Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_congr Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_weights_eq Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_eq_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
erw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_erase Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_erase
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_insert Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_insert
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_indicator_subset Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_map Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weighted_vsub_of_point Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_sdiff_sub Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_subtype_eq_filter Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter
/-- A weighted sum over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
(s.filter pred).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_filter_of_ne Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_of_point_const_smul Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
#align finset.weighted_vsub Finset.weightedVSub
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_apply Finset.weightedVSub_apply
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_of_sum_eq_zero Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_apply_const Finset.weightedVSub_apply_const
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_empty Finset.weightedVSub_empty
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_congr Finset.weightedVSub_congr
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
#align finset.weighted_vsub_indicator_subset Finset.weightedVSub_indicator_subset
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_map Finset.weightedVSub_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weighted_vsub_sub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weighted_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weighted_vsub Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_sdiff Finset.weightedVSub_sdiff
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_sdiff_sub Finset.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_subtype_eq_filter Finset.weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter
/-- A weighted sum over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : (s.filter pred).weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
#align finset.weighted_vsub_filter_of_ne Finset.weightedVSub_filter_of_ne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
#align finset.weighted_vsub_const_smul Finset.weightedVSub_const_smul
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
#align finset.affine_combination Finset.affineCombination
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
#align finset.affine_combination_linear Finset.affineCombination_linear
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
#align finset.affine_combination_apply Finset.affineCombination_apply
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align finset.affine_combination_apply_const Finset.affineCombination_apply_const
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
#align finset.affine_combination_congr Finset.affineCombination_congr
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_vadd_of_sum_eq_one Finset.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vadd_affine_combination Finset.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
#align finset.affine_combination_vsub Finset.affineCombination_vsub
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
#align finset.attach_affine_combination_of_injective Finset.attach_affineCombination_of_injective
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
#align finset.attach_affine_combination_coe Finset.attach_affineCombination_coe
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_eq_linear_combination Finset.weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_linear_combination Finset.affineCombination_eq_linear_combination
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
#align finset.affine_combination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero Finset.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
#align finset.affine_combination_indicator_subset Finset.affineCombination_indicator_subset
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
#align finset.affine_combination_map Finset.affineCombination_map
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_affine_combination_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
#align finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affine_combination_vsub Finset.sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
#align finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affine_combination Finset.sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
#align finset.affine_combination_sdiff_sub Finset.affineCombination_sdiff_sub
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : (s.filter (· ≠ i)).affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
#align finset.affine_combination_eq_of_weighted_vsub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one Finset.affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `s.filter pred`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
(s.filter pred).affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
#align finset.affine_combination_subtype_eq_filter Finset.affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter
/-- An affine combination over `s.filter pred` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
(s.filter pred).affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
#align finset.affine_combination_filter_of_ne Finset.affineCombination_filter_of_ne
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
#align finset.eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_subset_iff_eq_weighted_vsub_of_point_subtype Finset.eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
#align finset.eq_weighted_vsub_subset_iff_eq_weighted_vsub_subtype Finset.eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
#align finset.eq_affine_combination_subset_iff_eq_affine_combination_subtype Finset.eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
#align finset.map_affine_combination Finset.map_affineCombination
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i 1
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := by simp [affineCombinationSingleWeights]
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights_apply_self Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := by simp [affineCombinationSingleWeights, h]
#align finset.affine_combination_single_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
#align finset.sum_affine_combination_single_weights Finset.sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_self Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_self
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_left Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_right Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_vsub_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
#align finset.sum_weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights
variable {k}
/-- Weights for expressing `lineMap` as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (c : k) : ι → k :=
c • weightedVSubVSubWeights k j i + affineCombinationSingleWeights k i
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i i c = affineCombinationSingleWeights k i := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_self Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c i = 1 - c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm, sub_eq_neg_add]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_left Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c j = c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_right Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i)
(hj : t ≠ j) (c : k) : affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 0 := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, hi, hj]
#align finset.affine_combination_line_map_weights_apply_of_ne Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(c : k) : ∑ t ∈ s, affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 1 := by
simp_rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, Pi.add_apply, sum_add_distrib]
simp [hi, hj, ← mul_sum]
#align finset.sum_affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights
variable (k)
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationSingleWeights` gives the specified point. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationSingleWeights k i) = p i := by
refine s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ hi (by simp) ?_
rintro j - hj
simp [hj]
#align finset.affine_combination_affine_combination_single_weights Finset.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights
/-- A weighted subtraction with `weightedVSubVSubWeights` gives the result of subtracting the
specified points. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hj : j ∈ s) : s.weightedVSub p (weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j) = p i -ᵥ p j := by
rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, ← affineCombination_vsub,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hj]
#align finset.weighted_vsub_weighted_vsub_vsub_weights Finset.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights
variable {k}
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationLineMapWeights` gives the result of
`line_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (c : k) :
s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c) =
AffineMap.lineMap (p i) (p j) c := by
rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, ← weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination,
weightedVSub_const_smul, s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights k p hj hi, AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
#align finset.affine_combination_affine_combination_line_map_weights Finset.affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights
end Finset
namespace Finset
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- The weights for the centroid of some points. -/
def centroidWeights : ι → k :=
Function.const ι (card s : k)⁻¹
#align finset.centroid_weights Finset.centroidWeights
/-- `centroidWeights` at any point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroidWeights_apply (i : ι) : s.centroidWeights k i = (card s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_apply Finset.centroidWeights_apply
/-- `centroidWeights` equals a constant function. -/
theorem centroidWeights_eq_const : s.centroidWeights k = Function.const ι (card s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_eq_const Finset.centroidWeights_eq_const
variable {k}
/-- The weights in the centroid sum to 1, if the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero (h : (card s : k) ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by simp [h]
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero
variable (k)
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] (h : card s ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by
-- Porting note: `simp` cannot find `mul_inv_cancel` and does not use `norm_cast`
simp only [centroidWeights_apply, sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul, ne_eq, Nat.cast_eq_zero, card_eq_zero]
refine mul_inv_cancel ?_
norm_cast
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (ne_of_gt (card_pos.2 h))
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_nonempty Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] {n : ℕ} (h : card s = n + 1) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (h.symm ▸ Nat.succ_ne_zero n)
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one Finset.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one
/-- The centroid of some points. Although defined for any `s`, this
is intended to be used in the case where the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
def centroid (p : ι → P) : P :=
s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k)
#align finset.centroid Finset.centroid
/-- The definition of the centroid. -/
theorem centroid_def (p : ι → P) : s.centroid k p = s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_def Finset.centroid_def
theorem centroid_univ (s : Finset P) : univ.centroid k ((↑) : s → P) = s.centroid k id := by
rw [centroid, centroid, ← s.attach_affineCombination_coe]
congr
ext
simp
#align finset.centroid_univ Finset.centroid_univ
/-- The centroid of a single point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroid_singleton (p : ι → P) (i : ι) : ({i} : Finset ι).centroid k p = p i := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply]
#align finset.centroid_singleton Finset.centroid_singleton
/-- The centroid of two points, expressed directly as adding a vector
to a point. -/
theorem centroid_pair [DecidableEq ι] [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : ι → P) (i₁ i₂ : ι) :
({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι).centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p i₂ -ᵥ p i₁) +ᵥ p i₁ := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
· have hc : (card ({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι) : k) ≠ 0 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
norm_num
exact nonzero_of_invertible _
rw [centroid_def,
affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ _ _
(sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero _ hc) (p i₁)]
simp [h, one_add_one_eq_two]
#align finset.centroid_pair Finset.centroid_pair
/-- The centroid of two points indexed by `Fin 2`, expressed directly
as adding a vector to the first point. -/
theorem centroid_pair_fin [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : Fin 2 → P) :
univ.centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p 1 -ᵥ p 0) +ᵥ p 0 := by
rw [univ_fin2]
convert centroid_pair k p 0 1
#align finset.centroid_pair_fin Finset.centroid_pair_fin
/-- A centroid, over the image of an embedding, equals a centroid with
the same points and weights over the original `Finset`. -/
theorem centroid_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).centroid k p = s₂.centroid k (p ∘ e) := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_map, centroidWeights]
#align finset.centroid_map Finset.centroid_map
/-- `centroidWeights` gives the weights for the centroid as a
constant function, which is suitable when summing over the points
whose centroid is being taken. This function gives the weights in a
form suitable for summing over a larger set of points, as an indicator
function that is zero outside the set whose centroid is being taken.
In the case of a `Fintype`, the sum may be over `univ`. -/
def centroidWeightsIndicator : ι → k :=
Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k)
#align finset.centroid_weights_indicator Finset.centroidWeightsIndicator
/-- The definition of `centroidWeightsIndicator`. -/
theorem centroidWeightsIndicator_def :
s.centroidWeightsIndicator k = Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
#align finset.centroid_weights_indicator_def Finset.centroidWeightsIndicator_def
/-- The sum of the weights for the centroid indexed by a `Fintype`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator [Fintype ι] :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = ∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i :=
sum_indicator_subset _ (subset_univ _)
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is not
zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] [Fintype ι]
(h : card s ≠ 0) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_nonempty Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ}
(h : card s = n + 1) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one k h
#align finset.sum_centroid_weights_indicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one Finset.sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one
/-- The centroid as an affine combination over a `Fintype`. -/
theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
s.centroid k p = univ.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeightsIndicator k) :=
affineCombination_indicator_subset _ _ (subset_univ _)
#align finset.centroid_eq_affine_combination_fintype Finset.centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype
/-- An indexed family of points that is injective on the given
`Finset` has the same centroid as the image of that `Finset`. This is
stated in terms of a set equal to the image to provide control of
definitional equality for the index type used for the centroid of the
image. -/
theorem centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {ps : Set P} [Fintype ps]
(hps : ps = p '' ↑s) : s.centroid k p = (univ : Finset ps).centroid k fun x => (x : P) := by
let f : p '' ↑s → ι := fun x => x.property.choose
have hf : ∀ x, f x ∈ s ∧ p (f x) = x := fun x => x.property.choose_spec
let f' : ps → ι := fun x => f ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf' : ∀ x, f' x ∈ s ∧ p (f' x) = x := fun x => hf ⟨x, hps ▸ x.property⟩
have hf'i : Function.Injective f' := by
intro x y h
rw [Subtype.ext_iff, ← (hf' x).2, ← (hf' y).2, h]
let f'e : ps ↪ ι := ⟨f', hf'i⟩
have hu : Finset.univ.map f'e = s := by
ext x
rw [mem_map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, _, rfl⟩
exact (hf' i).1
· intro hx
use ⟨p x, hps.symm ▸ Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx⟩, mem_univ _
refine hi _ (hf' _).1 _ hx ?_
rw [(hf' _).2]
rw [← hu, centroid_map]
congr with x
change p (f' x) = ↑x
rw [(hf' x).2]
#align finset.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on Finset.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on
/-- Two indexed families of points that are injective on the given
`Finset`s and with the same points in the image of those `Finset`s
have the same centroid. -/
theorem centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {p₂ : ι₂ → P}
(hi₂ : ∀ i ∈ s₂, ∀ j ∈ s₂, p₂ i = p₂ j → i = j) (he : p '' ↑s = p₂ '' ↑s₂) :
s.centroid k p = s₂.centroid k p₂ := by
classical rw [s.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi rfl,
s₂.centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on k hi₂ he]
#align finset.centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq Finset.centroid_eq_of_inj_on_of_image_eq
end Finset
section AffineSpace'
variable {ι k V P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V] [AffineSpace V P]
/-- A `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0 is in the `vectorSpan` of
an indexed family. -/
theorem weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(p : ι → P) : s.weightedVSub p w ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
· simp [Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty s]
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total,
Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero s w p h (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
let w' := Set.indicator (↑s) w
have hwx : ∀ i, w' i ≠ 0 → i ∈ s := fun i => Set.mem_of_indicator_ne_zero
use Finsupp.onFinset s w' hwx, Set.subset_univ _
rw [Finsupp.total_apply, Finsupp.onFinset_sum hwx]
· apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
intro i hi
simp [w', Set.indicator_apply, if_pos hi]
· exact fun _ => zero_smul k _
#align weighted_vsub_mem_vector_span weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan
/-- An `affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 is in the
`affineSpan` of an indexed family, if the underlying ring is
nontrivial. -/
theorem affineCombination_mem_affineSpan [Nontrivial k] {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k}
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w ∈ affineSpan k (Set.range p) := by
classical
have hnz : ∑ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 := h.symm ▸ one_ne_zero
have hn : s.Nonempty := Finset.nonempty_of_sum_ne_zero hnz
cases' hn with i1 hi1
let w1 : ι → k := Function.update (Function.const ι 0) i1 1
have hw1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w1 i = 1 := by
simp only [Function.const_zero, Finset.sum_update_of_mem hi1, Pi.zero_apply,
Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero]
have hw1s : s.affineCombination k p w1 = p i1 :=
s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero w1 p hi1 (Function.update_same _ _ _) fun _ _ hne =>
Function.update_noteq hne _ _
have hv : s.affineCombination k p w -ᵥ p i1 ∈ (affineSpan k (Set.range p)).direction := by
rw [direction_affineSpan, ← hw1s, Finset.affineCombination_vsub]
apply weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan
-- Porting note: Rest was `simp [Pi.sub_apply, h, hw1]`,
-- but `Pi.sub_apply` transforms the goal into nonsense
change (Finset.sum s fun i => w i - w1 i) = 0
simp only [Finset.sum_sub_distrib, h, hw1, sub_self]
rw [← vsub_vadd (s.affineCombination k p w) (p i1)]
exact AffineSubspace.vadd_mem_of_mem_direction hv (mem_affineSpan k (Set.mem_range_self _))
#align affine_combination_mem_affine_span affineCombination_mem_affineSpan
variable (k)
/-- A vector is in the `vectorSpan` of an indexed family if and only
if it is a `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 1,037 | 1,075 | theorem mem_vectorSpan_iff_eq_weightedVSub {v : V} {p : ι → P} :
v ∈ vectorSpan k (Set.range p) ↔
∃ (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k), ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0 ∧ v = s.weightedVSub p w := by |
classical
constructor
· rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with (hι | ⟨⟨i0⟩⟩)
swap
· rw [vectorSpan_range_eq_span_range_vsub_right k p i0, ← Set.image_univ,
Finsupp.mem_span_image_iff_total]
rintro ⟨l, _, hv⟩
use insert i0 l.support
set w :=
(l : ι → k) - Function.update (Function.const ι 0 : ι → k) i0 (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i) with
hwdef
use w
have hw : ∑ i ∈ insert i0 l.support, w i = 0 := by
rw [hwdef]
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib,
Finset.sum_update_of_mem (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _),
Finset.sum_insert_of_eq_zero_if_not_mem Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.1]
simp only [Finsupp.mem_support_iff, ne_eq, Finset.mem_insert, true_or, not_true,
Function.const_apply, Finset.sum_const_zero, add_zero, sub_self]
use hw
have hz : w i0 • (p i0 -ᵥ p i0 : V) = 0 := (vsub_self (p i0)).symm ▸ smul_zero _
change (fun i => w i • (p i -ᵥ p i0 : V)) i0 = 0 at hz
rw [Finset.weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ w p hw (p i0),
Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← hv, Finsupp.total_apply,
@Finset.sum_insert_zero _ _ l.support i0 _ _ _ hz]
change (∑ i ∈ l.support, l i • _) = _
congr with i
by_cases h : i = i0
· simp [h]
· simp [hwdef, h]
· rw [Set.range_eq_empty, vectorSpan_empty, Submodule.mem_bot]
rintro rfl
use ∅
simp
· rintro ⟨s, w, hw, rfl⟩
exact weightedVSub_mem_vectorSpan hw p
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Cycle
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Type
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.List
#align_import group_theory.perm.cycle.concrete from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"00638177efd1b2534fc5269363ebf42a7871df9a"
/-!
# Properties of cyclic permutations constructed from lists/cycles
In the following, `{α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α]`.
## Main definitions
* `Cycle.formPerm`: the cyclic permutation created by looping over a `Cycle α`
* `Equiv.Perm.toList`: the list formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`: the cycle formed by iterating application of a permutation
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`: the equivalence between cyclic permutations `f : Perm α`
and the terms of `Cycle α` that correspond to them
* `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'`: the same equivalence as `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle`
but with evaluation via choosing over fintypes
* The notation `c[1, 2, 3]` to emulate notation of cyclic permutations `(1 2 3)`
* A `Repr` instance for any `Perm α`, by representing the `Finset` of
`Cycle α` that correspond to the cycle factors.
## Main results
* `List.isCycle_formPerm`: a nontrivial list without duplicates, when interpreted as
a permutation, is cyclic
* `Equiv.Perm.IsCycle.existsUnique_cycle`: there is only one nontrivial `Cycle α`
corresponding to each cyclic `f : Perm α`
## Implementation details
The forward direction of `Equiv.Perm.isoCycle'` uses `Fintype.choose` of the uniqueness
result, relying on the `Fintype` instance of a `Cycle.nodup` subtype.
It is unclear if this works faster than the `Equiv.Perm.toCycle`, which relies
on recursion over `Finset.univ`.
Running `#eval` on even a simple noncyclic permutation `c[(1 : Fin 7), 2, 3] * c[0, 5]`
to show it takes a long time. TODO: is this because computing the cycle factors is slow?
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm List
variable {α : Type*}
namespace List
variable [DecidableEq α] {l l' : List α}
theorem formPerm_disjoint_iff (hl : Nodup l) (hl' : Nodup l') (hn : 2 ≤ l.length)
(hn' : 2 ≤ l'.length) : Perm.Disjoint (formPerm l) (formPerm l') ↔ l.Disjoint l' := by
rw [disjoint_iff_eq_or_eq, List.Disjoint]
constructor
· rintro h x hx hx'
specialize h x
rw [formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl _ hx, formPerm_apply_mem_eq_self_iff _ hl' _ hx'] at h
omega
· intro h x
by_cases hx : x ∈ l
on_goal 1 => by_cases hx' : x ∈ l'
· exact (h hx hx').elim
all_goals have := formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ ‹_›; tauto
#align list.form_perm_disjoint_iff List.formPerm_disjoint_iff
theorem isCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) : IsCycle (formPerm l) := by
cases' l with x l
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num at hn
induction' l with y l generalizing x
· set_option tactic.skipAssignedInstances false in norm_num at hn
· use x
constructor
· rwa [formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_cons_self _ _)]
· intro w hw
have : w ∈ x::y::l := mem_of_formPerm_ne_self _ _ hw
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := get_of_mem this
use k
rw [← hk]
simp only [zpow_natCast, formPerm_pow_apply_head _ _ hl k, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt k.isLt]
#align list.is_cycle_form_perm List.isCycle_formPerm
theorem pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
Pairwise l.formPerm.SameCycle l :=
Pairwise.imp_mem.mpr
(pairwise_of_forall fun _ _ hx hy =>
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).sameCycle ((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hx).mpr hn)
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ hy).mpr hn))
#align list.pairwise_same_cycle_form_perm List.pairwise_sameCycle_formPerm
theorem cycleOf_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) (x) :
cycleOf l.attach.formPerm x = l.attach.formPerm :=
have hn : 2 ≤ l.attach.length := by rwa [← length_attach] at hn
have hl : l.attach.Nodup := by rwa [← nodup_attach] at hl
(isCycle_formPerm hl hn).cycleOf_eq
((formPerm_apply_mem_ne_self_iff _ hl _ (mem_attach _ _)).mpr hn)
#align list.cycle_of_form_perm List.cycleOf_formPerm
theorem cycleType_formPerm (hl : Nodup l) (hn : 2 ≤ l.length) :
cycleType l.attach.formPerm = {l.length} := by
rw [← length_attach] at hn
rw [← nodup_attach] at hl
rw [cycleType_eq [l.attach.formPerm]]
· simp only [map, Function.comp_apply]
rw [support_formPerm_of_nodup _ hl, card_toFinset, dedup_eq_self.mpr hl]
· simp
· intro x h
simp [h, Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] at hn
· simp
· simpa using isCycle_formPerm hl hn
· simp
#align list.cycle_type_form_perm List.cycleType_formPerm
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (hl : Nodup l) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ l) :
formPerm l x = next l x hx := by
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := get_of_mem hx
rw [next_get _ hl, formPerm_apply_get _ hl]
#align list.form_perm_apply_mem_eq_next List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next
end List
namespace Cycle
variable [DecidableEq α] (s s' : Cycle α)
/-- A cycle `s : Cycle α`, given `Nodup s` can be interpreted as an `Equiv.Perm α`
where each element in the list is permuted to the next one, defined as `formPerm`.
-/
def formPerm : ∀ s : Cycle α, Nodup s → Equiv.Perm α :=
fun s => Quotient.hrecOn s (fun l _ => List.formPerm l) fun l₁ l₂ (h : l₁ ~r l₂) => by
apply Function.hfunext
· ext
exact h.nodup_iff
· intro h₁ h₂ _
exact heq_of_eq (formPerm_eq_of_isRotated h₁ h)
#align cycle.form_perm Cycle.formPerm
@[simp]
theorem formPerm_coe (l : List α) (hl : l.Nodup) : formPerm (l : Cycle α) hl = l.formPerm :=
rfl
#align cycle.form_perm_coe Cycle.formPerm_coe
theorem formPerm_subsingleton (s : Cycle α) (h : Subsingleton s) : formPerm s h.nodup = 1 := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
simp only [formPerm_coe, mk_eq_coe]
simp only [length_subsingleton_iff, length_coe, mk_eq_coe] at h
cases' s with hd tl
· simp
· simp only [length_eq_zero, add_le_iff_nonpos_left, List.length, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at h
simp [h]
#align cycle.form_perm_subsingleton Cycle.formPerm_subsingleton
theorem isCycle_formPerm (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
IsCycle (formPerm s h) := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.isCycle_formPerm h (length_nontrivial hn)
#align cycle.is_cycle_form_perm Cycle.isCycle_formPerm
theorem support_formPerm [Fintype α] (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (hn : Nontrivial s) :
support (formPerm s h) = s.toFinset := by
induction' s using Quot.inductionOn with s
refine support_formPerm_of_nodup s h ?_
rintro _ rfl
simpa [Nat.succ_le_succ_iff] using length_nontrivial hn
#align cycle.support_form_perm Cycle.support_formPerm
theorem formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∉ s) :
formPerm s h x = x := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem _ _ hx
#align cycle.form_perm_eq_self_of_not_mem Cycle.formPerm_eq_self_of_not_mem
theorem formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) (x : α) (hx : x ∈ s) :
formPerm s h x = next s h x hx := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using List.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next h _ (by simp_all)
#align cycle.form_perm_apply_mem_eq_next Cycle.formPerm_apply_mem_eq_next
nonrec theorem formPerm_reverse (s : Cycle α) (h : Nodup s) :
formPerm s.reverse (nodup_reverse_iff.mpr h) = (formPerm s h)⁻¹ := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
simpa using formPerm_reverse _
#align cycle.form_perm_reverse Cycle.formPerm_reverse
nonrec theorem formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {s s' : Cycle α} {hs : s.Nodup}
{hs' : s'.Nodup} :
s.formPerm hs = s'.formPerm hs' ↔ s = s' ∨ s.Subsingleton ∧ s'.Subsingleton := by
rw [Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff, Cycle.length_subsingleton_iff]
revert s s'
intro s s'
apply @Quotient.inductionOn₂' _ _ _ _ _ s s'
intro l l'
-- Porting note: was `simpa using formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff`
simp_all
intro hs hs'
constructor <;> intro h <;> simp_all only [formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff]
#align cycle.form_perm_eq_form_perm_iff Cycle.formPerm_eq_formPerm_iff
end Cycle
namespace Equiv.Perm
section Fintype
variable [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] (p : Equiv.Perm α) (x : α)
/-- `Equiv.Perm.toList (f : Perm α) (x : α)` generates the list `[x, f x, f (f x), ...]`
until looping. That means when `f x = x`, `toList f x = []`.
-/
def toList : List α :=
(List.range (cycleOf p x).support.card).map fun k => (p ^ k) x
#align equiv.perm.to_list Equiv.Perm.toList
@[simp]
theorem toList_one : toList (1 : Perm α) x = [] := by simp [toList, cycleOf_one]
#align equiv.perm.to_list_one Equiv.Perm.toList_one
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil_iff {p : Perm α} {x} : toList p x = [] ↔ x ∉ p.support := by simp [toList]
#align equiv.perm.to_list_eq_nil_iff Equiv.Perm.toList_eq_nil_iff
@[simp]
theorem length_toList : length (toList p x) = (cycleOf p x).support.card := by simp [toList]
#align equiv.perm.length_to_list Equiv.Perm.length_toList
theorem toList_ne_singleton (y : α) : toList p x ≠ [y] := by
intro H
simpa [card_support_ne_one] using congr_arg length H
#align equiv.perm.to_list_ne_singleton Equiv.Perm.toList_ne_singleton
theorem two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support {p : Perm α} {x : α} :
2 ≤ length (toList p x) ↔ x ∈ p.support := by simp
#align equiv.perm.two_le_length_to_list_iff_mem_support Equiv.Perm.two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support
theorem length_toList_pos_of_mem_support (h : x ∈ p.support) : 0 < length (toList p x) :=
zero_lt_two.trans_le (two_le_length_toList_iff_mem_support.mpr h)
#align equiv.perm.length_to_list_pos_of_mem_support Equiv.Perm.length_toList_pos_of_mem_support
theorem get_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).get ⟨n, hn⟩ = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
theorem toList_get_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).get ⟨0, (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h)⟩ = x := by simp [toList]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated get_toList (since := "2024-05-08")]
theorem nthLe_toList (n : ℕ) (hn : n < length (toList p x)) :
(toList p x).nthLe n hn = (p ^ n) x := by simp [toList]
#align equiv.perm.nth_le_to_list Equiv.Perm.nthLe_toList
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated toList_get_zero (since := "2024-05-08")]
theorem toList_nthLe_zero (h : x ∈ p.support) :
(toList p x).nthLe 0 (length_toList_pos_of_mem_support _ _ h) = x := by simp [toList]
#align equiv.perm.to_list_nth_le_zero Equiv.Perm.toList_nthLe_zero
variable {p} {x}
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Cycle/Concrete.lean | 265 | 274 | theorem mem_toList_iff {y : α} : y ∈ toList p x ↔ SameCycle p x y ∧ x ∈ p.support := by |
simp only [toList, mem_range, mem_map]
constructor
· rintro ⟨n, hx, rfl⟩
refine ⟨⟨n, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
contrapose! hx
rw [← support_cycleOf_eq_nil_iff] at hx
simp [hx]
· rintro ⟨h, hx⟩
simpa using h.exists_pow_eq_of_mem_support hx
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Order.SuccPred.Relation
import Mathlib.Topology.Clopen
import Mathlib.Topology.Irreducible
#align_import topology.connected from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d101e93197bb5f6ea89bd7ba386b7f7dff1f3903"
/-!
# Connected subsets of topological spaces
In this file we define connected subsets of a topological spaces and various other properties and
classes related to connectivity.
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsConnected`: a nonempty set that has no non-trivial open partition.
See also the section below in the module doc.
* `connectedComponent` is the connected component of an element in the space.
We also have a class stating that the whole space satisfies that property: `ConnectedSpace`
## On the definition of connected sets/spaces
In informal mathematics, connected spaces are assumed to be nonempty.
We formalise the predicate without that assumption as `IsPreconnected`.
In other words, the only difference is whether the empty space counts as connected.
There are good reasons to consider the empty space to be “too simple to be simple”
See also https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple,
and in particular
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/too+simple+to+be+simple#relationship_to_biased_definitions.
-/
open Set Function Topology TopologicalSpace Relation
open scoped Classical
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {ι : Type*} {π : ι → Type*} [TopologicalSpace α]
{s t u v : Set α}
section Preconnected
/-- A preconnected set is one where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsPreconnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u v : Set α, IsOpen u → IsOpen v → s ⊆ u ∪ v → (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (s ∩ v).Nonempty →
(s ∩ (u ∩ v)).Nonempty
#align is_preconnected IsPreconnected
/-- A connected set is one that is nonempty and where there is no non-trivial open partition. -/
def IsConnected (s : Set α) : Prop :=
s.Nonempty ∧ IsPreconnected s
#align is_connected IsConnected
theorem IsConnected.nonempty {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : s.Nonempty :=
h.1
#align is_connected.nonempty IsConnected.nonempty
theorem IsConnected.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (h : IsConnected s) : IsPreconnected s :=
h.2
#align is_connected.is_preconnected IsConnected.isPreconnected
theorem IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (H : IsPreirreducible s) : IsPreconnected s :=
fun _ _ hu hv _ => H _ _ hu hv
#align is_preirreducible.is_preconnected IsPreirreducible.isPreconnected
theorem IsIrreducible.isConnected {s : Set α} (H : IsIrreducible s) : IsConnected s :=
⟨H.nonempty, H.isPreirreducible.isPreconnected⟩
#align is_irreducible.is_connected IsIrreducible.isConnected
theorem isPreconnected_empty : IsPreconnected (∅ : Set α) :=
isPreirreducible_empty.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_empty isPreconnected_empty
theorem isConnected_singleton {x} : IsConnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isIrreducible_singleton.isConnected
#align is_connected_singleton isConnected_singleton
theorem isPreconnected_singleton {x} : IsPreconnected ({x} : Set α) :=
isConnected_singleton.isPreconnected
#align is_preconnected_singleton isPreconnected_singleton
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected {s : Set α} (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsPreconnected s :=
hs.induction_on isPreconnected_empty fun _ => isPreconnected_singleton
#align set.subsingleton.is_preconnected Set.Subsingleton.isPreconnected
/-- If any point of a set is joined to a fixed point by a preconnected subset,
then the original set is preconnected as well. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Connected/Basic.lean | 96 | 111 | theorem isPreconnected_of_forall {s : Set α} (x : α)
(H : ∀ y ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ x ∈ t ∧ y ∈ t ∧ IsPreconnected t) : IsPreconnected s := by |
rintro u v hu hv hs ⟨z, zs, zu⟩ ⟨y, ys, yv⟩
have xs : x ∈ s := by
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, -, -⟩
exact ts xt
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: use `wlog xu : x ∈ u := hs xs using u v y z, v u z y`
cases hs xs with
| inl xu =>
rcases H y ys with ⟨t, ts, xt, yt, ht⟩
have := ht u v hu hv (ts.trans hs) ⟨x, xt, xu⟩ ⟨y, yt, yv⟩
exact this.imp fun z hz => ⟨ts hz.1, hz.2⟩
| inr xv =>
rcases H z zs with ⟨t, ts, xt, zt, ht⟩
have := ht v u hv hu (ts.trans <| by rwa [union_comm]) ⟨x, xt, xv⟩ ⟨z, zt, zu⟩
exact this.imp fun _ h => ⟨ts h.1, h.2.2, h.2.1⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Devon Tuma. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Devon Tuma
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
#align_import probability.probability_mass_function.monad from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4ac69b290818724c159de091daa3acd31da0ee6d"
/-!
# Monad Operations for Probability Mass Functions
This file constructs two operations on `PMF` that give it a monad structure.
`pure a` is the distribution where a single value `a` has probability `1`.
`bind pa pb : PMF β` is the distribution given by sampling `a : α` from `pa : PMF α`,
and then sampling from `pb a : PMF β` to get a final result `b : β`.
`bindOnSupport` generalizes `bind` to allow binding to a partial function,
so that the second argument only needs to be defined on the support of the first argument.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {α β γ : Type*}
open scoped Classical
open NNReal ENNReal
open MeasureTheory
namespace PMF
section Pure
/-- The pure `PMF` is the `PMF` where all the mass lies in one point.
The value of `pure a` is `1` at `a` and `0` elsewhere. -/
def pure (a : α) : PMF α :=
⟨fun a' => if a' = a then 1 else 0, hasSum_ite_eq _ _⟩
#align pmf.pure PMF.pure
variable (a a' : α)
@[simp]
theorem pure_apply : pure a a' = if a' = a then 1 else 0 := rfl
#align pmf.pure_apply PMF.pure_apply
@[simp]
theorem support_pure : (pure a).support = {a} :=
Set.ext fun a' => by simp [mem_support_iff]
#align pmf.support_pure PMF.support_pure
| Mathlib/Probability/ProbabilityMassFunction/Monad.lean | 54 | 54 | theorem mem_support_pure_iff : a' ∈ (pure a).support ↔ a' = a := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.AffineIsometry
#align_import geometry.euclidean.angle.unoriented.affine from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"46b633fd842bef9469441c0209906f6dddd2b4f5"
/-!
# Angles between points
This file defines unoriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.angle`, with notation `∠`, is the undirected angle determined by three
points.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ p₁ p₂ : P}
/-- The undirected angle at `p2` between the line segments to `p1` and
`p3`. If either of those points equals `p2`, this is π/2. Use
`open scoped EuclideanGeometry` to access the `∠ p1 p2 p3`
notation. -/
nonrec def angle (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p1 -ᵥ p2 : V) (p3 -ᵥ p2)
#align euclidean_geometry.angle EuclideanGeometry.angle
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp
((continuous_fst.vsub continuous_snd.fst).prod_mk
(continuous_snd.snd.vsub continuous_snd.fst)).continuousAt
#align euclidean_geometry.continuous_at_angle EuclideanGeometry.continuousAt_angle
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
#align affine_isometry.angle_map AffineIsometry.angle_map
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
#align affine_subspace.angle_coe AffineSubspace.angle_coe
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_vadd EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_vadd
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_vadd_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_vadd_const
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_vsub EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_vsub
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_vsub_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_vsub_const
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_add_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_add_const
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_add EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_add
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_sub_const EuclideanGeometry.angle_sub_const
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_const_sub EuclideanGeometry.angle_const_sub
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_neg EuclideanGeometry.angle_neg
/-- The angle at a point does not depend on the order of the other two
points. -/
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = ∠ p3 p2 p1 :=
angle_comm _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_comm EuclideanGeometry.angle_comm
/-- The angle at a point is nonnegative. -/
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p1 p2 p3 : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p1 p2 p3 :=
angle_nonneg _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_nonneg EuclideanGeometry.angle_nonneg
/-- The angle at a point is at most π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p1 p2 p3 : P) : ∠ p1 p2 p3 ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_le_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_le_pi
/-- The angle ∠AAB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_left EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_left
/-- The angle ∠ABB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_right EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_right
/-- The angle ∠ABA at a point is `0`, unless `A = B`. -/
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self $ vsub_ne_zero.2 h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_of_ne EuclideanGeometry.angle_self_of_ne
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_left := angle_self_left
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_right := angle_self_right
@[deprecated (since := "2024-02-14")] alias angle_eq_of_ne := angle_self_of_ne
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BAC is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : ∠ p2 p1 p3 = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp1p2, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp1p2
use hp1p2, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p1 p2, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BCA is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) :
∠ p2 p3 p1 = 0 := by
rw [angle_comm] at h
exact angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ABC = ∠ABD. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi (p1 : P) {p2 p3 p4 : P} (h : ∠ p2 p3 p4 = π) :
∠ p1 p2 p3 = ∠ p1 p2 p4 := by
unfold angle at *
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
rw [eq_comm]
convert angle_smul_right_of_pos (p1 -ᵥ p2) (p3 -ᵥ p2) (add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one)
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p2 p3, smul_neg, neg_smul, ← hpr]
simp
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ACB + ∠ACD = π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi (p1 : P) {p2 p3 p4 : P} (h : ∠ p2 p3 p4 = π) :
∠ p1 p3 p2 + ∠ p1 p3 p4 = π := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_comm p1 p3 p2, angle_comm p1 p3 p4]
unfold angle
exact angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi _ h
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- **Vertical Angles Theorem**: angles opposite each other, formed by two intersecting straight
lines, are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 p4 p5 : P} (hapc : ∠ p1 p5 p3 = π)
(hbpd : ∠ p2 p5 p4 = π) : ∠ p1 p5 p2 = ∠ p3 p5 p4 := by
linarith [angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p1 hbpd, angle_comm p4 p5 p1,
angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p4 hapc, angle_comm p4 p5 p3]
#align euclidean_geometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist A B ≠ 0. -/
theorem left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : dist p1 p2 ≠ 0 := by
by_contra heq
rw [dist_eq_zero] at heq
rw [heq, angle_self_left] at h
exact Real.pi_ne_zero (by linarith)
#align euclidean_geometry.left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist C B ≠ 0. -/
theorem right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) : dist p3 p2 ≠ 0 :=
left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi <| (angle_comm _ _ _).trans h
#align euclidean_geometry.right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- If ∠ABC = π, then (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (h : ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p1 p2 + dist p3 p2 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h
#align euclidean_geometry.dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi EuclideanGeometry.dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = π if and only if (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 233 | 238 | theorem dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi {p1 p2 p3 : P} (hp1p2 : p1 ≠ p2) (hp3p2 : p3 ≠ p2) :
dist p1 p3 = dist p1 p2 + dist p3 p2 ↔ ∠ p1 p2 p3 = π := by |
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi (fun he => hp1p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
hp3p2 (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Data.PFunctor.Univariate.Basic
#align_import data.pfunctor.univariate.M from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"8631e2d5ea77f6c13054d9151d82b83069680cb1"
/-!
# M-types
M types are potentially infinite tree-like structures. They are defined
as the greatest fixpoint of a polynomial functor.
-/
universe u v w
open Nat Function
open List
variable (F : PFunctor.{u})
-- Porting note: the ♯ tactic is never used
-- local prefix:0 "♯" => cast (by first |simp [*]|cc|solve_by_elim)
namespace PFunctor
namespace Approx
/-- `CofixA F n` is an `n` level approximation of an M-type -/
inductive CofixA : ℕ → Type u
| continue : CofixA 0
| intro {n} : ∀ a, (F.B a → CofixA n) → CofixA (succ n)
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a PFunctor.Approx.CofixA
/-- default inhabitant of `CofixA` -/
protected def CofixA.default [Inhabited F.A] : ∀ n, CofixA F n
| 0 => CofixA.continue
| succ n => CofixA.intro default fun _ => CofixA.default n
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a.default PFunctor.Approx.CofixA.default
instance [Inhabited F.A] {n} : Inhabited (CofixA F n) :=
⟨CofixA.default F n⟩
theorem cofixA_eq_zero : ∀ x y : CofixA F 0, x = y
| CofixA.continue, CofixA.continue => rfl
#align pfunctor.approx.cofix_a_eq_zero PFunctor.Approx.cofixA_eq_zero
variable {F}
/-- The label of the root of the tree for a non-trivial
approximation of the cofix of a pfunctor.
-/
def head' : ∀ {n}, CofixA F (succ n) → F.A
| _, CofixA.intro i _ => i
#align pfunctor.approx.head' PFunctor.Approx.head'
/-- for a non-trivial approximation, return all the subtrees of the root -/
def children' : ∀ {n} (x : CofixA F (succ n)), F.B (head' x) → CofixA F n
| _, CofixA.intro _ f => f
#align pfunctor.approx.children' PFunctor.Approx.children'
| Mathlib/Data/PFunctor/Univariate/M.lean | 66 | 67 | theorem approx_eta {n : ℕ} (x : CofixA F (n + 1)) : x = CofixA.intro (head' x) (children' x) := by |
cases x; rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Jeremy Avigad, Minchao Wu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Attr
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.FinsetOps
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
#align_import data.finset.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"442a83d738cb208d3600056c489be16900ba701d"
/-!
# Finite sets
Terms of type `Finset α` are one way of talking about finite subsets of `α` in mathlib.
Below, `Finset α` is defined as a structure with 2 fields:
1. `val` is a `Multiset α` of elements;
2. `nodup` is a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
Finsets in Lean are constructive in that they have an underlying `List` that enumerates their
elements. In particular, any function that uses the data of the underlying list cannot depend on its
ordering. This is handled on the `Multiset` level by multiset API, so in most cases one needn't
worry about it explicitly.
Finsets give a basic foundation for defining finite sums and products over types:
1. `∑ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`;
2. `∏ i ∈ (s : Finset α), f i`.
Lean refers to these operations as big operators.
More information can be found in `Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset`.
Finsets are directly used to define fintypes in Lean.
A `Fintype α` instance for a type `α` consists of a universal `Finset α` containing every term of
`α`, called `univ`. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
There is also `univ'`, the noncomputable partner to `univ`,
which is defined to be `α` as a finset if `α` is finite,
and the empty finset otherwise. See `Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic`.
`Finset.card`, the size of a finset is defined in `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card`.
This is then used to define `Fintype.card`, the size of a type.
## Main declarations
### Main definitions
* `Finset`: Defines a type for the finite subsets of `α`.
Constructing a `Finset` requires two pieces of data: `val`, a `Multiset α` of elements,
and `nodup`, a proof that `val` has no duplicates.
* `Finset.instMembershipFinset`: Defines membership `a ∈ (s : Finset α)`.
* `Finset.instCoeTCFinsetSet`: Provides a coercion `s : Finset α` to `s : Set α`.
* `Finset.instCoeSortFinsetType`: Coerce `s : Finset α` to the type of all `x ∈ s`.
* `Finset.induction_on`: Induction on finsets. To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty finset, and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the finset obtained by inserting a new element.
* `Finset.choose`: Given a proof `h` of existence and uniqueness of a certain element
satisfying a predicate, `choose s h` returns the element of `s` satisfying that predicate.
### Finset constructions
* `Finset.instSingletonFinset`: Denoted by `{a}`; the finset consisting of one element.
* `Finset.empty`: Denoted by `∅`. The finset associated to any type consisting of no elements.
* `Finset.range`: For any `n : ℕ`, `range n` is equal to `{0, 1, ... , n - 1} ⊆ ℕ`.
This convention is consistent with other languages and normalizes `card (range n) = n`.
Beware, `n` is not in `range n`.
* `Finset.attach`: Given `s : Finset α`, `attach s` forms a finset of elements of the subtype
`{a // a ∈ s}`; in other words, it attaches elements to a proof of membership in the set.
### Finsets from functions
* `Finset.filter`: Given a decidable predicate `p : α → Prop`, `s.filter p` is
the finset consisting of those elements in `s` satisfying the predicate `p`.
### The lattice structure on subsets of finsets
There is a natural lattice structure on the subsets of a set.
In Lean, we use lattice notation to talk about things involving unions and intersections. See
`Mathlib.Order.Lattice`. For the lattice structure on finsets, `⊥` is called `bot` with `⊥ = ∅` and
`⊤` is called `top` with `⊤ = univ`.
* `Finset.instHasSubsetFinset`: Lots of API about lattices, otherwise behaves as one would expect.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: Defines `s ∪ t` (or `s ⊔ t`) as the union of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.sup`/`Finset.biUnion` for finite unions.
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: Defines `s ∩ t` (or `s ⊓ t`) as the intersection of `s` and `t`.
See `Finset.inf` for finite intersections.
### Operations on two or more finsets
* `insert` and `Finset.cons`: For any `a : α`, `insert s a` returns `s ∪ {a}`. `cons s a h`
returns the same except that it requires a hypothesis stating that `a` is not already in `s`.
This does not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.instUnionFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.instInterFinset`: see "The lattice structure on subsets of finsets"
* `Finset.erase`: For any `a : α`, `erase s a` returns `s` with the element `a` removed.
* `Finset.instSDiffFinset`: Defines the set difference `s \ t` for finsets `s` and `t`.
* `Finset.product`: Given finsets of `α` and `β`, defines finsets of `α × β`.
For arbitrary dependent products, see `Mathlib.Data.Finset.Pi`.
### Predicates on finsets
* `Disjoint`: defined via the lattice structure on finsets; two sets are disjoint if their
intersection is empty.
* `Finset.Nonempty`: A finset is nonempty if it has elements. This is equivalent to saying `s ≠ ∅`.
### Equivalences between finsets
* The `Mathlib.Data.Equiv` files describe a general type of equivalence, so look in there for any
lemmas. There is some API for rewriting sums and products from `s` to `t` given that `s ≃ t`.
TODO: examples
## Tags
finite sets, finset
-/
-- Assert that we define `Finset` without the material on `List.sublists`.
-- Note that we cannot use `List.sublists` itself as that is defined very early.
assert_not_exists List.sublistsLen
assert_not_exists Multiset.Powerset
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice
open Multiset Subtype Nat Function
universe u
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
/-- `Finset α` is the type of finite sets of elements of `α`. It is implemented
as a multiset (a list up to permutation) which has no duplicate elements. -/
structure Finset (α : Type*) where
/-- The underlying multiset -/
val : Multiset α
/-- `val` contains no duplicates -/
nodup : Nodup val
#align finset Finset
instance Multiset.canLiftFinset {α} : CanLift (Multiset α) (Finset α) Finset.val Multiset.Nodup :=
⟨fun m hm => ⟨⟨m, hm⟩, rfl⟩⟩
#align multiset.can_lift_finset Multiset.canLiftFinset
namespace Finset
theorem eq_of_veq : ∀ {s t : Finset α}, s.1 = t.1 → s = t
| ⟨s, _⟩, ⟨t, _⟩, h => by cases h; rfl
#align finset.eq_of_veq Finset.eq_of_veq
theorem val_injective : Injective (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ => eq_of_veq
#align finset.val_injective Finset.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem val_inj {s t : Finset α} : s.1 = t.1 ↔ s = t :=
val_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.val_inj Finset.val_inj
@[simp]
theorem dedup_eq_self [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : dedup s.1 = s.1 :=
s.2.dedup
#align finset.dedup_eq_self Finset.dedup_eq_self
instance decidableEq [DecidableEq α] : DecidableEq (Finset α)
| _, _ => decidable_of_iff _ val_inj
#align finset.has_decidable_eq Finset.decidableEq
/-! ### membership -/
instance : Membership α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => a ∈ s.1⟩
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s ↔ a ∈ s.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_def Finset.mem_def
@[simp]
theorem mem_val {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ s.1 ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_val Finset.mem_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_mk {a : α} {s nd} : a ∈ @Finset.mk α s nd ↔ a ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_mk Finset.mem_mk
instance decidableMem [_h : DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ s) :=
Multiset.decidableMem _ _
#align finset.decidable_mem Finset.decidableMem
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ a = b) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
@[simp] lemma forall_mem_not_eq' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, ¬ b = a) ↔ a ∉ s := by aesop
/-! ### set coercion -/
-- Porting note (#11445): new definition
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
@[coe] def toSet (s : Finset α) : Set α :=
{ a | a ∈ s }
/-- Convert a finset to a set in the natural way. -/
instance : CoeTC (Finset α) (Set α) :=
⟨toSet⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem mem_coe {a : α} {s : Finset α} : a ∈ (s : Set α) ↔ a ∈ (s : Finset α) :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.mem_coe Finset.mem_coe
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem {α} {s : Finset α} : { a | a ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
#align finset.set_of_mem Finset.setOf_mem
@[simp]
theorem coe_mem {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) : ↑x ∈ s :=
x.2
#align finset.coe_mem Finset.coe_mem
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mk_coe {s : Finset α} (x : (s : Set α)) {h} : (⟨x, h⟩ : (s : Set α)) = x :=
Subtype.coe_eta _ _
#align finset.mk_coe Finset.mk_coe
instance decidableMem' [DecidableEq α] (a : α) (s : Finset α) : Decidable (a ∈ (s : Set α)) :=
s.decidableMem _
#align finset.decidable_mem' Finset.decidableMem'
/-! ### extensionality -/
theorem ext_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ ∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂ :=
val_inj.symm.trans <| s₁.nodup.ext s₂.nodup
#align finset.ext_iff Finset.ext_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (∀ a, a ∈ s₁ ↔ a ∈ s₂) → s₁ = s₂ :=
ext_iff.2
#align finset.ext Finset.ext
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) = s₂ ↔ s₁ = s₂ :=
Set.ext_iff.trans ext_iff.symm
#align finset.coe_inj Finset.coe_inj
theorem coe_injective {α} : Injective ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) := fun _s _t => coe_inj.1
#align finset.coe_injective Finset.coe_injective
/-! ### type coercion -/
/-- Coercion from a finset to the corresponding subtype. -/
instance {α : Type u} : CoeSort (Finset α) (Type u) :=
⟨fun s => { x // x ∈ s }⟩
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem forall_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
#align finset.forall_coe Finset.forall_coe
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
protected theorem exists_coe {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (p : s → Prop) :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : α) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
#align finset.exists_coe Finset.exists_coe
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift (ι : Type*) (α : ι → Type*) [_ne : ∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
(s : Finset ι) : CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α (· ∈ s)
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift
instance PiFinsetCoe.canLift' (ι α : Type*) [_ne : Nonempty α] (s : Finset ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiFinsetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
#align finset.pi_finset_coe.can_lift' Finset.PiFinsetCoe.canLift'
instance FinsetCoe.canLift (s : Finset α) : CanLift α s (↑) fun a => a ∈ s where
prf a ha := ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
#align finset.finset_coe.can_lift Finset.FinsetCoe.canLift
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_sort_coe (s : Finset α) : ((s : Set α) : Sort _) = s :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_sort_coe Finset.coe_sort_coe
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
section Subset
variable {s t : Finset α}
instance : HasSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∈ t⟩
instance : HasSSubset (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder (Finset α) where
le := (· ⊆ ·)
lt := (· ⊂ ·)
le_refl s a := id
le_trans s t u hst htu a ha := htu <| hst ha
le_antisymm s t hst hts := ext fun a => ⟨@hst _, @hts _⟩
instance : IsRefl (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Finset α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Finset α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Finset α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
theorem subset_def : s ⊆ t ↔ s.1 ⊆ t.1 :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_def Finset.subset_def
theorem ssubset_def : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.ssubset_def Finset.ssubset_def
@[simp]
theorem Subset.refl (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ s :=
Multiset.Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.refl Finset.Subset.refl
protected theorem Subset.rfl {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset.rfl Finset.Subset.rfl
protected theorem subset_of_eq {s t : Finset α} (h : s = t) : s ⊆ t :=
h ▸ Subset.refl _
#align finset.subset_of_eq Finset.subset_of_eq
theorem Subset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₂ ⊆ s₃ → s₁ ⊆ s₃ :=
Multiset.Subset.trans
#align finset.subset.trans Finset.Subset.trans
theorem Superset.trans {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊇ s₂ → s₂ ⊇ s₃ → s₁ ⊇ s₃ := fun h' h =>
Subset.trans h h'
#align finset.superset.trans Finset.Superset.trans
theorem mem_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
Multiset.mem_of_subset
#align finset.mem_of_subset Finset.mem_of_subset
theorem not_mem_mono {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) {a : α} : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| @h _
#align finset.not_mem_mono Finset.not_mem_mono
theorem Subset.antisymm {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (H₁ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (H₂ : s₂ ⊆ s₁) : s₁ = s₂ :=
ext fun a => ⟨@H₁ a, @H₂ a⟩
#align finset.subset.antisymm Finset.Subset.antisymm
theorem subset_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s₁ → x ∈ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.subset_iff Finset.subset_iff
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊆ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_subset Finset.coe_subset
@[simp]
theorem val_le_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 ≤ s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
le_iff_subset s₁.2
#align finset.val_le_iff Finset.val_le_iff
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ = s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ s₂ ⊆ s₁ :=
le_antisymm_iff
#align finset.subset.antisymm_iff Finset.Subset.antisymm_iff
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∉ t := by simp only [← coe_subset, Set.not_subset, mem_coe]
#align finset.not_subset Finset.not_subset
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.le_eq_subset Finset.le_eq_subset
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_subset : ((· < ·) : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
#align finset.lt_eq_subset Finset.lt_eq_subset
theorem le_iff_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ≤ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.le_iff_subset Finset.le_iff_subset
theorem lt_iff_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ < s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.lt_iff_ssubset Finset.lt_iff_ssubset
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
show (s₁ : Set α) ⊂ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∧ ¬s₂ ⊆ s₁ by simp only [Set.ssubset_def, Finset.coe_subset]
#align finset.coe_ssubset Finset.coe_ssubset
@[simp]
theorem val_lt_iff {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁.1 < s₂.1 ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr val_le_iff <| not_congr val_le_iff
#align finset.val_lt_iff Finset.val_lt_iff
lemma val_strictMono : StrictMono (val : Finset α → Multiset α) := fun _ _ ↦ val_lt_iff.2
theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Finset α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne _ _ s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne Finset.ssubset_iff_subset_ne
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ⊂ s₂ ↔ ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h
#align finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset Finset.ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset
theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) :
s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
Set.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃
#align finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset Finset.ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : s₁ ⊂ s₂) : ∃ x ∈ s₂, x ∉ s₁ :=
Set.exists_of_ssubset h
#align finset.exists_of_ssubset Finset.exists_of_ssubset
instance isWellFounded_ssubset : IsWellFounded (Finset α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
Subrelation.isWellFounded (InvImage _ _) val_lt_iff.2
#align finset.is_well_founded_ssubset Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT (Finset α) :=
Finset.isWellFounded_ssubset
#align finset.is_well_founded_lt Finset.wellFoundedLT
end Subset
-- TODO: these should be global attributes, but this will require fixing other files
attribute [local trans] Subset.trans Superset.trans
/-! ### Order embedding from `Finset α` to `Set α` -/
/-- Coercion to `Set α` as an `OrderEmbedding`. -/
def coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α :=
⟨⟨(↑), coe_injective⟩, coe_subset⟩
#align finset.coe_emb Finset.coeEmb
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeEmb : ⇑(coeEmb : Finset α ↪o Set α) = ((↑) : Finset α → Set α) :=
rfl
#align finset.coe_coe_emb Finset.coe_coeEmb
/-! ### Nonempty -/
/-- The property `s.Nonempty` expresses the fact that the finset `s` is not empty. It should be used
in theorem assumptions instead of `∃ x, x ∈ s` or `s ≠ ∅` as it gives access to a nice API thanks
to the dot notation. -/
protected def Nonempty (s : Finset α) : Prop := ∃ x : α, x ∈ s
#align finset.nonempty Finset.Nonempty
-- Porting note: Much longer than in Lean3
instance decidableNonempty {s : Finset α} : Decidable s.Nonempty :=
Quotient.recOnSubsingleton (motive := fun s : Multiset α => Decidable (∃ a, a ∈ s)) s.1
(fun l : List α =>
match l with
| [] => isFalse <| by simp
| a::l => isTrue ⟨a, by simp⟩)
#align finset.decidable_nonempty Finset.decidableNonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_nonempty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
Iff.rfl
#align finset.coe_nonempty Finset.coe_nonempty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : Nonempty (s : Type _) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
#align finset.nonempty_coe_sort Finset.nonempty_coe_sort
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.to_set⟩ := coe_nonempty
#align finset.nonempty.to_set Finset.Nonempty.to_set
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
#align finset.nonempty.coe_sort Finset.Nonempty.coe_sort
theorem Nonempty.exists_mem {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : ∃ x : α, x ∈ s :=
h
#align finset.nonempty.bex Finset.Nonempty.exists_mem
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-23")] alias Nonempty.bex := Nonempty.exists_mem
theorem Nonempty.mono {s t : Finset α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
Set.Nonempty.mono hst hs
#align finset.nonempty.mono Finset.Nonempty.mono
theorem Nonempty.forall_const {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) {p : Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s, p) ↔ p :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := h
⟨fun h => h x hx, fun h _ _ => h⟩
#align finset.nonempty.forall_const Finset.Nonempty.forall_const
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty s :=
nonempty_coe_sort.2
#align finset.nonempty.to_subtype Finset.Nonempty.to_subtype
theorem Nonempty.to_type {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _hx⟩ => ⟨x⟩
#align finset.nonempty.to_type Finset.Nonempty.to_type
/-! ### empty -/
section Empty
variable {s : Finset α}
/-- The empty finset -/
protected def empty : Finset α :=
⟨0, nodup_zero⟩
#align finset.empty Finset.empty
instance : EmptyCollection (Finset α) :=
⟨Finset.empty⟩
instance inhabitedFinset : Inhabited (Finset α) :=
⟨∅⟩
#align finset.inhabited_finset Finset.inhabitedFinset
@[simp]
theorem empty_val : (∅ : Finset α).1 = 0 :=
rfl
#align finset.empty_val Finset.empty_val
@[simp]
theorem not_mem_empty (a : α) : a ∉ (∅ : Finset α) := by
-- Porting note: was `id`. `a ∈ List.nil` is no longer definitionally equal to `False`
simp only [mem_def, empty_val, not_mem_zero, not_false_iff]
#align finset.not_mem_empty Finset.not_mem_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Finset α).Nonempty := fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => not_mem_empty x hx
#align finset.not_nonempty_empty Finset.not_nonempty_empty
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero : (⟨0, nodup_zero⟩ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_zero Finset.mk_zero
theorem ne_empty_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ≠ ∅ := fun e =>
not_mem_empty a <| e ▸ h
#align finset.ne_empty_of_mem Finset.ne_empty_of_mem
theorem Nonempty.ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : s ≠ ∅ :=
(Exists.elim h) fun _a => ne_empty_of_mem
#align finset.nonempty.ne_empty Finset.Nonempty.ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Finset α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
zero_subset _
#align finset.empty_subset Finset.empty_subset
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} (H : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
eq_of_veq (eq_zero_of_forall_not_mem H)
#align finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Finset α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
-- Porting note: used `id`
⟨by rintro rfl x; apply not_mem_empty, fun h => eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem h⟩
#align finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_zero {s : Finset α} : s.1 = 0 ↔ s = ∅ :=
@val_inj _ s ∅
#align finset.val_eq_zero Finset.val_eq_zero
theorem subset_empty {s : Finset α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
subset_zero.trans val_eq_zero
#align finset.subset_empty Finset.subset_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_ssubset_empty (s : Finset α) : ¬s ⊂ ∅ := fun h =>
let ⟨_, he, _⟩ := exists_of_ssubset h
-- Porting note: was `he`
not_mem_empty _ he
#align finset.not_ssubset_empty Finset.not_ssubset_empty
theorem nonempty_of_ne_empty {s : Finset α} (h : s ≠ ∅) : s.Nonempty :=
exists_mem_of_ne_zero (mt val_eq_zero.1 h)
#align finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_of_ne_empty
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty {s : Finset α} : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, nonempty_of_ne_empty⟩
#align finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.not.trans not_not
#align finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty Finset.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
by_cases Or.inl fun h => Or.inr (nonempty_of_ne_empty h)
#align finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_empty : ((∅ : Finset α) : Set α) = ∅ :=
Set.ext <| by simp
#align finset.coe_empty Finset.coe_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_empty {s : Finset α} : (s : Set α) = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by rw [← coe_empty, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_empty Finset.coe_eq_empty
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Finset α} : IsEmpty (s : Type _) ↔ s = ∅ := by
simpa using @Set.isEmpty_coe_sort α s
#align finset.is_empty_coe_sort Finset.isEmpty_coe_sort
instance instIsEmpty : IsEmpty (∅ : Finset α) :=
isEmpty_coe_sort.2 rfl
/-- A `Finset` for an empty type is empty. -/
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Finset α) : s = ∅ :=
Finset.eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
#align finset.eq_empty_of_is_empty Finset.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance : OrderBot (Finset α) where
bot := ∅
bot_le := empty_subset
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Finset α) = ∅ :=
rfl
#align finset.bot_eq_empty Finset.bot_eq_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Finset α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
#align finset.empty_ssubset Finset.empty_ssubset
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
#align finset.nonempty.empty_ssubset Finset.Nonempty.empty_ssubset
end Empty
/-! ### singleton -/
section Singleton
variable {s : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `{a} : Finset a` is the set `{a}` containing `a` and nothing else.
This differs from `insert a ∅` in that it does not require a `DecidableEq` instance for `α`.
-/
instance : Singleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨{a}, nodup_singleton a⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem singleton_val (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).1 = {a} :=
rfl
#align finset.singleton_val Finset.singleton_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_singleton {a b : α} : b ∈ ({a} : Finset α) ↔ b = a :=
Multiset.mem_singleton
#align finset.mem_singleton Finset.mem_singleton
theorem eq_of_mem_singleton {x y : α} (h : x ∈ ({y} : Finset α)) : x = y :=
mem_singleton.1 h
#align finset.eq_of_mem_singleton Finset.eq_of_mem_singleton
theorem not_mem_singleton {a b : α} : a ∉ ({b} : Finset α) ↔ a ≠ b :=
not_congr mem_singleton
#align finset.not_mem_singleton Finset.not_mem_singleton
theorem mem_singleton_self (a : α) : a ∈ ({a} : Finset α) :=
-- Porting note: was `Or.inl rfl`
mem_singleton.mpr rfl
#align finset.mem_singleton_self Finset.mem_singleton_self
@[simp]
theorem val_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {s : Finset α} : s.val = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← val_inj]
rfl
#align finset.val_eq_singleton_iff Finset.val_eq_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_injective : Injective (singleton : α → Finset α) := fun _a _b h =>
mem_singleton.1 (h ▸ mem_singleton_self _)
#align finset.singleton_injective Finset.singleton_injective
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inj : ({a} : Finset α) = {b} ↔ a = b :=
singleton_injective.eq_iff
#align finset.singleton_inj Finset.singleton_inj
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem singleton_nonempty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_singleton_self a⟩
#align finset.singleton_nonempty Finset.singleton_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem singleton_ne_empty (a : α) : ({a} : Finset α) ≠ ∅ :=
(singleton_nonempty a).ne_empty
#align finset.singleton_ne_empty Finset.singleton_ne_empty
theorem empty_ssubset_singleton : (∅ : Finset α) ⊂ {a} :=
(singleton_nonempty _).empty_ssubset
#align finset.empty_ssubset_singleton Finset.empty_ssubset_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_singleton (a : α) : (({a} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_singleton Finset.coe_singleton
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_singleton {s : Finset α} {a : α} : (s : Set α) = {a} ↔ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_singleton, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_singleton Finset.coe_eq_singleton
@[norm_cast]
lemma coe_subset_singleton : (s : Set α) ⊆ {a} ↔ s ⊆ {a} := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
@[norm_cast]
lemma singleton_subset_coe : {a} ⊆ (s : Set α) ↔ {a} ⊆ s := by rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton]
theorem eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s = {a} ↔ a ∈ s ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor <;> intro t
· rw [t]
exact ⟨Finset.mem_singleton_self _, fun _ => Finset.mem_singleton.1⟩
· ext
rw [Finset.mem_singleton]
exact ⟨t.right _, fun r => r.symm ▸ t.left⟩
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem {s : Finset α} {a : α} :
s = {a} ↔ s.Nonempty ∧ ∀ x ∈ s, x = a := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· rintro ⟨hne, h_uniq⟩
rw [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem]
refine ⟨?_, h_uniq⟩
rw [← h_uniq hne.choose hne.choose_spec]
exact hne.choose_spec
#align finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem Finset.eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem
theorem nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default [Unique α] {s : Finset α} :
s.Nonempty ↔ s = {default} := by
simp [eq_singleton_iff_nonempty_unique_mem, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
#align finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default Finset.nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
alias ⟨Nonempty.eq_singleton_default, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_eq_singleton_default
#align finset.nonempty.eq_singleton_default Finset.Nonempty.eq_singleton_default
theorem singleton_iff_unique_mem (s : Finset α) : (∃ a, s = {a}) ↔ ∃! a, a ∈ s := by
simp only [eq_singleton_iff_unique_mem, ExistsUnique]
#align finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem Finset.singleton_iff_unique_mem
theorem singleton_subset_set_iff {s : Set α} {a : α} : ↑({a} : Finset α) ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [coe_singleton, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
#align finset.singleton_subset_set_iff Finset.singleton_subset_set_iff
@[simp]
theorem singleton_subset_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : {a} ⊆ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
singleton_subset_set_iff
#align finset.singleton_subset_iff Finset.singleton_subset_iff
@[simp]
theorem subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = ∅ ∨ s = {a} := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_singleton, Set.subset_singleton_iff_eq, coe_eq_empty, coe_eq_singleton]
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff Finset.subset_singleton_iff
theorem singleton_subset_singleton : ({a} : Finset α) ⊆ {b} ↔ a = b := by simp
#align finset.singleton_subset_singleton Finset.singleton_subset_singleton
protected theorem Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} (h : s.Nonempty) :
s ⊆ {a} ↔ s = {a} :=
subset_singleton_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h.ne_empty
#align finset.nonempty.subset_singleton_iff Finset.Nonempty.subset_singleton_iff
theorem subset_singleton_iff' {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊆ {a} ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b = a :=
forall₂_congr fun _ _ => mem_singleton
#align finset.subset_singleton_iff' Finset.subset_singleton_iff'
@[simp]
theorem ssubset_singleton_iff {s : Finset α} {a : α} : s ⊂ {a} ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_singleton, Set.ssubset_singleton_iff, coe_eq_empty]
#align finset.ssubset_singleton_iff Finset.ssubset_singleton_iff
theorem eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton {s : Finset α} {x : α} (hs : s ⊂ {x}) : s = ∅ :=
ssubset_singleton_iff.1 hs
#align finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton Finset.eq_empty_of_ssubset_singleton
/-- A finset is nontrivial if it has at least two elements. -/
protected abbrev Nontrivial (s : Finset α) : Prop := (s : Set α).Nontrivial
#align finset.nontrivial Finset.Nontrivial
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_empty : ¬ (∅ : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_empty Finset.not_nontrivial_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nontrivial_singleton : ¬ ({a} : Finset α).Nontrivial := by simp [Finset.Nontrivial]
#align finset.not_nontrivial_singleton Finset.not_nontrivial_singleton
theorem Nontrivial.ne_singleton (hs : s.Nontrivial) : s ≠ {a} := by
rintro rfl; exact not_nontrivial_singleton hs
#align finset.nontrivial.ne_singleton Finset.Nontrivial.ne_singleton
nonrec lemma Nontrivial.exists_ne (hs : s.Nontrivial) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := hs.exists_ne _
theorem eq_singleton_or_nontrivial (ha : a ∈ s) : s = {a} ∨ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton]; exact Set.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha
#align finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
theorem nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton (ha : a ∈ s) : s.Nontrivial ↔ s ≠ {a} :=
⟨Nontrivial.ne_singleton, (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).resolve_left⟩
#align finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton Finset.nontrivial_iff_ne_singleton
theorem Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial : s.Nonempty → (∃ a, s = {a}) ∨ s.Nontrivial :=
fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => (eq_singleton_or_nontrivial ha).imp_left <| Exists.intro a
#align finset.nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial Finset.Nonempty.exists_eq_singleton_or_nontrivial
instance instNontrivial [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Finset α) :=
‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a => ⟨⟨{a}, ∅, singleton_ne_empty _⟩⟩
#align finset.nontrivial' Finset.instNontrivial
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Finset α) where
default := ∅
uniq _ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem isEmptyElim
instance (i : α) : Unique ({i} : Finset α) where
default := ⟨i, mem_singleton_self i⟩
uniq j := Subtype.ext <| mem_singleton.mp j.2
@[simp]
lemma default_singleton (i : α) : ((default : ({i} : Finset α)) : α) = i := rfl
end Singleton
/-! ### cons -/
section Cons
variable {s t : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `cons a s h` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. It is the same as
`insert a s` when it is defined, but unlike `insert a s` it does not require `DecidableEq α`,
and the union is guaranteed to be disjoint. -/
def cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s) : Finset α :=
⟨a ::ₘ s.1, nodup_cons.2 ⟨h, s.2⟩⟩
#align finset.cons Finset.cons
@[simp]
theorem mem_cons {h} : b ∈ s.cons a h ↔ b = a ∨ b ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_cons
#align finset.mem_cons Finset.mem_cons
theorem mem_cons_of_mem {a b : α} {s : Finset α} {hb : b ∉ s} (ha : a ∈ s) : a ∈ cons b s hb :=
Multiset.mem_cons_of_mem ha
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem mem_cons_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) {h} : a ∈ cons a s h :=
Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _
#align finset.mem_cons_self Finset.mem_cons_self
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.cons_val Finset.cons_val
theorem forall_mem_cons (h : a ∉ s) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) ↔ p a ∧ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x := by
simp only [mem_cons, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.forall_mem_cons Finset.forall_mem_cons
/-- Useful in proofs by induction. -/
theorem forall_of_forall_cons {p : α → Prop} {h : a ∉ s} (H : ∀ x, x ∈ cons a s h → p x) (x)
(h : x ∈ s) : p x :=
H _ <| mem_cons.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.forall_of_forall_cons Finset.forall_of_forall_cons
@[simp]
theorem mk_cons {s : Multiset α} (h : (a ::ₘ s).Nodup) :
(⟨a ::ₘ s, h⟩ : Finset α) = cons a ⟨s, (nodup_cons.1 h).2⟩ (nodup_cons.1 h).1 :=
rfl
#align finset.mk_cons Finset.mk_cons
@[simp]
theorem cons_empty (a : α) : cons a ∅ (not_mem_empty _) = {a} := rfl
#align finset.cons_empty Finset.cons_empty
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem nonempty_cons (h : a ∉ s) : (cons a s h).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_cons.2 <| Or.inl rfl⟩
#align finset.nonempty_cons Finset.nonempty_cons
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_mk {m : Multiset α} {hm} : (⟨m, hm⟩ : Finset α).Nonempty ↔ m ≠ 0 := by
induction m using Multiset.induction_on <;> simp
#align finset.nonempty_mk Finset.nonempty_mk
@[simp]
theorem coe_cons {a s h} : (@cons α a s h : Set α) = insert a (s : Set α) := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_cons Finset.coe_cons
theorem subset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊆ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.subset_cons _ _
#align finset.subset_cons Finset.subset_cons
theorem ssubset_cons (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ s.cons a h :=
Multiset.ssubset_cons h
#align finset.ssubset_cons Finset.ssubset_cons
theorem cons_subset {h : a ∉ s} : s.cons a h ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t :=
Multiset.cons_subset
#align finset.cons_subset Finset.cons_subset
@[simp]
theorem cons_subset_cons {hs ht} : s.cons a hs ⊆ t.cons a ht ↔ s ⊆ t := by
rwa [← coe_subset, coe_cons, coe_cons, Set.insert_subset_insert_iff, coe_subset]
#align finset.cons_subset_cons Finset.cons_subset_cons
theorem ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ (a : _) (h : a ∉ s), s.cons a h ⊆ t := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun ⟨a, ha, h⟩ => ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset (ssubset_cons _) h⟩
obtain ⟨a, hs, ht⟩ := not_subset.1 h.2
exact ⟨a, ht, cons_subset.2 ⟨hs, h.subset⟩⟩
#align finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset Finset.ssubset_iff_exists_cons_subset
end Cons
/-! ### disjoint -/
section Disjoint
variable {f : α → β} {s t u : Finset α} {a b : α}
theorem disjoint_left : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → a ∉ t :=
⟨fun h a hs ht => not_mem_empty a <|
singleton_subset_iff.mp (h (singleton_subset_iff.mpr hs) (singleton_subset_iff.mpr ht)),
fun h _ hs ht _ ha => (h (hs ha) (ht ha)).elim⟩
#align finset.disjoint_left Finset.disjoint_left
theorem disjoint_right : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ t → a ∉ s := by
rw [_root_.disjoint_comm, disjoint_left]
#align finset.disjoint_right Finset.disjoint_right
theorem disjoint_iff_ne : Disjoint s t ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, ∀ b ∈ t, a ≠ b := by
simp only [disjoint_left, imp_not_comm, forall_eq']
#align finset.disjoint_iff_ne Finset.disjoint_iff_ne
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_val : s.1.Disjoint t.1 ↔ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.disjoint_val Finset.disjoint_val
theorem _root_.Disjoint.forall_ne_finset (h : Disjoint s t) (ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ t) : a ≠ b :=
disjoint_iff_ne.1 h _ ha _ hb
#align disjoint.forall_ne_finset Disjoint.forall_ne_finset
theorem not_disjoint_iff : ¬Disjoint s t ↔ ∃ a, a ∈ s ∧ a ∈ t :=
disjoint_left.not.trans <| not_forall.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => by
rw [Classical.not_imp, not_not]
#align finset.not_disjoint_iff Finset.not_disjoint_iff
theorem disjoint_of_subset_left (h : s ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint u t) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_left.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_left Finset.disjoint_of_subset_left
theorem disjoint_of_subset_right (h : t ⊆ u) (d : Disjoint s u) : Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_right.2 fun _x m₁ => (disjoint_right.1 d) (h m₁)
#align finset.disjoint_of_subset_right Finset.disjoint_of_subset_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_left (s : Finset α) : Disjoint ∅ s :=
disjoint_bot_left
#align finset.disjoint_empty_left Finset.disjoint_empty_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_empty_right (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s ∅ :=
disjoint_bot_right
#align finset.disjoint_empty_right Finset.disjoint_empty_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_left : Disjoint (singleton a) s ↔ a ∉ s := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_singleton, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_left Finset.disjoint_singleton_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton_right : Disjoint s (singleton a) ↔ a ∉ s :=
disjoint_comm.trans disjoint_singleton_left
#align finset.disjoint_singleton_right Finset.disjoint_singleton_right
-- Porting note: Left-hand side simplifies @[simp]
theorem disjoint_singleton : Disjoint ({a} : Finset α) {b} ↔ a ≠ b := by
rw [disjoint_singleton_left, mem_singleton]
#align finset.disjoint_singleton Finset.disjoint_singleton
theorem disjoint_self_iff_empty (s : Finset α) : Disjoint s s ↔ s = ∅ :=
disjoint_self
#align finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty Finset.disjoint_self_iff_empty
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem disjoint_coe : Disjoint (s : Set α) t ↔ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [Finset.disjoint_left, Set.disjoint_left, mem_coe]
#align finset.disjoint_coe Finset.disjoint_coe
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem pairwiseDisjoint_coe {ι : Type*} {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Finset α} :
s.PairwiseDisjoint (fun i => f i : ι → Set α) ↔ s.PairwiseDisjoint f :=
forall₅_congr fun _ _ _ _ _ => disjoint_coe
#align finset.pairwise_disjoint_coe Finset.pairwiseDisjoint_coe
end Disjoint
/-! ### disjoint union -/
/-- `disjUnion s t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`.
It is the same as `s ∪ t`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The hypothesis
ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjUnion (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) : Finset α :=
⟨s.1 + t.1, Multiset.nodup_add.2 ⟨s.2, t.2, disjoint_val.2 h⟩⟩
#align finset.disj_union Finset.disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem mem_disjUnion {α s t h a} : a ∈ @disjUnion α s t h ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t := by
rcases s with ⟨⟨s⟩⟩; rcases t with ⟨⟨t⟩⟩; apply List.mem_append
#align finset.mem_disj_union Finset.mem_disjUnion
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_disjUnion {s t : Finset α} (h : Disjoint s t) :
(disjUnion s t h : Set α) = (s : Set α) ∪ t :=
Set.ext <| by simp
theorem disjUnion_comm (s t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s t) :
disjUnion s t h = disjUnion t s h.symm :=
eq_of_veq <| add_comm _ _
#align finset.disj_union_comm Finset.disjUnion_comm
@[simp]
theorem empty_disjUnion (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint ∅ t := disjoint_bot_left) :
disjUnion ∅ t h = t :=
eq_of_veq <| zero_add _
#align finset.empty_disj_union Finset.empty_disjUnion
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_empty (s : Finset α) (h : Disjoint s ∅ := disjoint_bot_right) :
disjUnion s ∅ h = s :=
eq_of_veq <| add_zero _
#align finset.disj_union_empty Finset.disjUnion_empty
theorem singleton_disjUnion (a : α) (t : Finset α) (h : Disjoint {a} t) :
disjUnion {a} t h = cons a t (disjoint_singleton_left.mp h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_add _ _
#align finset.singleton_disj_union Finset.singleton_disjUnion
theorem disjUnion_singleton (s : Finset α) (a : α) (h : Disjoint s {a}) :
disjUnion s {a} h = cons a s (disjoint_singleton_right.mp h) := by
rw [disjUnion_comm, singleton_disjUnion]
#align finset.disj_union_singleton Finset.disjUnion_singleton
/-! ### insert -/
section Insert
variable [DecidableEq α] {s t u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `insert a s` is the set `{a} ∪ s` containing `a` and the elements of `s`. -/
instance : Insert α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a s => ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩⟩
theorem insert_def (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = ⟨_, s.2.ndinsert a⟩ :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_def Finset.insert_def
@[simp]
theorem insert_val (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = ndinsert a s.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_val Finset.insert_val
theorem insert_val' (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).1 = dedup (a ::ₘ s.1) := by
rw [dedup_cons, dedup_eq_self]; rfl
#align finset.insert_val' Finset.insert_val'
theorem insert_val_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).1 = a ::ₘ s.1 := by
rw [insert_val, ndinsert_of_not_mem h]
#align finset.insert_val_of_not_mem Finset.insert_val_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem mem_insert : a ∈ insert b s ↔ a = b ∨ a ∈ s :=
mem_ndinsert
#align finset.mem_insert Finset.mem_insert
theorem mem_insert_self (a : α) (s : Finset α) : a ∈ insert a s :=
mem_ndinsert_self a s.1
#align finset.mem_insert_self Finset.mem_insert_self
theorem mem_insert_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ insert b s :=
mem_ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.mem_insert_of_mem Finset.mem_insert_of_mem
theorem mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne (h : b ∈ insert a s) : b ≠ a → b ∈ s :=
(mem_insert.1 h).resolve_left
#align finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne Finset.mem_of_mem_insert_of_ne
theorem eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (ha : b ∈ insert a s) (hb : b ∉ s) : b = a :=
(mem_insert.1 ha).resolve_right hb
#align finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert Finset.eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert
/-- A version of `LawfulSingleton.insert_emptyc_eq` that works with `dsimp`. -/
@[simp, nolint simpNF] lemma insert_empty : insert a (∅ : Finset α) = {a} := rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_eq_insert (a s h) : @cons α a s h = insert a s :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.cons_eq_insert Finset.cons_eq_insert
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : ↑(insert a s) = (insert a s : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_coe, mem_insert, Set.mem_insert_iff]
#align finset.coe_insert Finset.coe_insert
theorem mem_insert_coe {s : Finset α} {x y : α} : x ∈ insert y s ↔ x ∈ insert y (s : Set α) := by
simp
#align finset.mem_insert_coe Finset.mem_insert_coe
instance : LawfulSingleton α (Finset α) :=
⟨fun a => by ext; simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) : insert a s = s :=
eq_of_veq <| ndinsert_of_mem h
#align finset.insert_eq_of_mem Finset.insert_eq_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_eq_self : insert a s = s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ mem_insert_self _ _, insert_eq_of_mem⟩
#align finset.insert_eq_self Finset.insert_eq_self
theorem insert_ne_self : insert a s ≠ s ↔ a ∉ s :=
insert_eq_self.not
#align finset.insert_ne_self Finset.insert_ne_self
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem pair_eq_singleton (a : α) : ({a, a} : Finset α) = {a} :=
insert_eq_of_mem <| mem_singleton_self _
#align finset.pair_eq_singleton Finset.pair_eq_singleton
theorem Insert.comm (a b : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert b s) = insert b (insert a s) :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, or_left_comm]
#align finset.insert.comm Finset.Insert.comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pair {a b : α} : (({a, b} : Finset α) : Set α) = {a, b} := by
ext
simp
#align finset.coe_pair Finset.coe_pair
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_eq_pair {s : Finset α} {a b : α} : (s : Set α) = {a, b} ↔ s = {a, b} := by
rw [← coe_pair, coe_inj]
#align finset.coe_eq_pair Finset.coe_eq_pair
theorem pair_comm (a b : α) : ({a, b} : Finset α) = {b, a} :=
Insert.comm a b ∅
#align finset.pair_comm Finset.pair_comm
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem insert_idem (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a (insert a s) = insert a s :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_insert, ← or_assoc, or_self_iff]
#align finset.insert_idem Finset.insert_idem
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem insert_nonempty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : (insert a s).Nonempty :=
⟨a, mem_insert_self a s⟩
#align finset.insert_nonempty Finset.insert_nonempty
@[simp]
theorem insert_ne_empty (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s ≠ ∅ :=
(insert_nonempty a s).ne_empty
#align finset.insert_ne_empty Finset.insert_ne_empty
-- Porting note: explicit universe annotation is no longer required.
instance (i : α) (s : Finset α) : Nonempty ((insert i s : Finset α) : Set α) :=
(Finset.coe_nonempty.mpr (s.insert_nonempty i)).to_subtype
theorem ne_insert_of_not_mem (s t : Finset α) {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ≠ insert a t := by
contrapose! h
simp [h]
#align finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem Finset.ne_insert_of_not_mem
theorem insert_subset_iff : insert a s ⊆ t ↔ a ∈ t ∧ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_insert, forall_eq, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.insert_subset Finset.insert_subset_iff
theorem insert_subset (ha : a ∈ t) (hs : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ t :=
insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨ha,hs⟩
@[simp] theorem subset_insert (a : α) (s : Finset α) : s ⊆ insert a s := fun _b => mem_insert_of_mem
#align finset.subset_insert Finset.subset_insert
@[gcongr]
theorem insert_subset_insert (a : α) {s t : Finset α} (h : s ⊆ t) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t :=
insert_subset_iff.2 ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, Subset.trans h (subset_insert _ _)⟩
#align finset.insert_subset_insert Finset.insert_subset_insert
@[simp] lemma insert_subset_insert_iff (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s ⊆ insert a t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp_rw [← coe_subset]; simp [-coe_subset, ha]
theorem insert_inj (ha : a ∉ s) : insert a s = insert b s ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h => eq_of_not_mem_of_mem_insert (h.subst <| mem_insert_self _ _) ha, congr_arg (insert · s)⟩
#align finset.insert_inj Finset.insert_inj
theorem insert_inj_on (s : Finset α) : Set.InjOn (fun a => insert a s) sᶜ := fun _ h _ _ =>
(insert_inj h).1
#align finset.insert_inj_on Finset.insert_inj_on
theorem ssubset_iff : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s ⊆ t := mod_cast @Set.ssubset_iff_insert α s t
#align finset.ssubset_iff Finset.ssubset_iff
theorem ssubset_insert (h : a ∉ s) : s ⊂ insert a s :=
ssubset_iff.mpr ⟨a, h, Subset.rfl⟩
#align finset.ssubset_insert Finset.ssubset_insert
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (empty : p ∅)
(cons : ∀ (a : α) (s : Finset α) (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : ∀ s, p s
| ⟨s, nd⟩ => by
induction s using Multiset.induction with
| empty => exact empty
| cons a s IH =>
rw [mk_cons nd]
exact cons a _ _ (IH _)
#align finset.cons_induction Finset.cons_induction
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem cons_induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} (s : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s), p s → p (cons a s h)) : p s :=
cons_induction h₁ h₂ s
#align finset.cons_induction_on Finset.cons_induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (empty : p ∅)
(insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : ∀ s, p s :=
cons_induction empty fun a s ha => (s.cons_eq_insert a ha).symm ▸ insert ha
#align finset.induction Finset.induction
/-- To prove a proposition about an arbitrary `Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α)
(empty : p ∅) (insert : ∀ ⦃a : α⦄ {s : Finset α}, a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p s :=
Finset.induction empty insert s
#align finset.induction_on Finset.induction_on
/-- To prove a proposition about `S : Finset α`,
it suffices to prove it for the empty `Finset`,
and to show that if it holds for some `Finset α ⊆ S`,
then it holds for the `Finset` obtained by inserting a new element of `S`.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {α : Type*} {p : Finset α → Prop} [DecidableEq α] (S : Finset α) (h₁ : p ∅)
(h₂ : ∀ {a s}, a ∈ S → s ⊆ S → a ∉ s → p s → p (insert a s)) : p S :=
@Finset.induction_on α (fun T => T ⊆ S → p T) _ S (fun _ => h₁)
(fun _ _ has hqs hs =>
let ⟨hS, sS⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 hs
h₂ hS sS has (hqs sS))
(Finset.Subset.refl S)
#align finset.induction_on' Finset.induction_on'
/-- To prove a proposition about a nonempty `s : Finset α`, it suffices to show it holds for all
singletons and that if it holds for nonempty `t : Finset α`, then it also holds for the `Finset`
obtained by inserting an element in `t`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem Nonempty.cons_induction {α : Type*} {p : ∀ s : Finset α, s.Nonempty → Prop}
(singleton : ∀ a, p {a} (singleton_nonempty _))
(cons : ∀ a s (h : a ∉ s) (hs), p s hs → p (Finset.cons a s h) (nonempty_cons h))
{s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) : p s hs := by
induction s using Finset.cons_induction with
| empty => exact (not_nonempty_empty hs).elim
| cons a t ha h =>
obtain rfl | ht := t.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact singleton a
· exact cons a t ha ht (h ht)
#align finset.nonempty.cons_induction Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction
lemma Nonempty.exists_cons_eq (hs : s.Nonempty) : ∃ t a ha, cons a t ha = s :=
hs.cons_induction (fun a ↦ ⟨∅, a, _, cons_empty _⟩) fun _ _ _ _ _ ↦ ⟨_, _, _, rfl⟩
/-- Inserting an element to a finite set is equivalent to the option type. -/
def subtypeInsertEquivOption {t : Finset α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ t) :
{ i // i ∈ insert x t } ≃ Option { i // i ∈ t } where
toFun y := if h : ↑y = x then none else some ⟨y, (mem_insert.mp y.2).resolve_left h⟩
invFun y := (y.elim ⟨x, mem_insert_self _ _⟩) fun z => ⟨z, mem_insert_of_mem z.2⟩
left_inv y := by
by_cases h : ↑y = x
· simp only [Subtype.ext_iff, h, Option.elim, dif_pos, Subtype.coe_mk]
· simp only [h, Option.elim, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_eta, Subtype.coe_mk]
right_inv := by
rintro (_ | y)
· simp only [Option.elim, dif_pos]
· have : ↑y ≠ x := by
rintro ⟨⟩
exact h y.2
simp only [this, Option.elim, Subtype.eta, dif_neg, not_false_iff, Subtype.coe_mk]
#align finset.subtype_insert_equiv_option Finset.subtypeInsertEquivOption
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_left : Disjoint (insert a s) t ↔ a ∉ t ∧ Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_insert, or_imp, forall_and, forall_eq]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_left Finset.disjoint_insert_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_insert_right : Disjoint s (insert a t) ↔ a ∉ s ∧ Disjoint s t :=
disjoint_comm.trans <| by rw [disjoint_insert_left, _root_.disjoint_comm]
#align finset.disjoint_insert_right Finset.disjoint_insert_right
end Insert
/-! ### Lattice structure -/
section Lattice
variable [DecidableEq α] {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u v : Finset α} {a b : α}
/-- `s ∪ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∪ t` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Union (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, t.2.ndunion s.1⟩⟩
/-- `s ∩ t` is the set such that `a ∈ s ∩ t` iff `a ∈ s` and `a ∈ t`. -/
instance : Inter (Finset α) :=
⟨fun s t => ⟨_, s.2.ndinter t.1⟩⟩
instance : Lattice (Finset α) :=
{ Finset.partialOrder with
sup := (· ∪ ·)
sup_le := fun _ _ _ hs ht _ ha => (mem_ndunion.1 ha).elim (fun h => hs h) fun h => ht h
le_sup_left := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inl h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ _ h => mem_ndunion.2 <| Or.inr h
inf := (· ∩ ·)
le_inf := fun _ _ _ ht hu _ h => mem_ndinter.2 ⟨ht h, hu h⟩
inf_le_left := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).1
inf_le_right := fun _ _ _ h => (mem_ndinter.1 h).2 }
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : (Sup.sup : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Union.union :=
rfl
#align finset.sup_eq_union Finset.sup_eq_union
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : (Inf.inf : Finset α → Finset α → Finset α) = Inter.inter :=
rfl
#align finset.inf_eq_inter Finset.inf_eq_inter
theorem disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty : Disjoint s t ↔ s ∩ t = ∅ :=
disjoint_iff
#align finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty Finset.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty
instance decidableDisjoint (U V : Finset α) : Decidable (Disjoint U V) :=
decidable_of_iff _ disjoint_left.symm
#align finset.decidable_disjoint Finset.decidableDisjoint
/-! #### union -/
theorem union_val_nd (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = ndunion s.1 t.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.union_val_nd Finset.union_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem union_val (s t : Finset α) : (s ∪ t).1 = s.1 ∪ t.1 :=
ndunion_eq_union s.2
#align finset.union_val Finset.union_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_union : a ∈ s ∪ t ↔ a ∈ s ∨ a ∈ t :=
mem_ndunion
#align finset.mem_union Finset.mem_union
@[simp]
theorem disjUnion_eq_union (s t h) : @disjUnion α s t h = s ∪ t :=
ext fun a => by simp
#align finset.disj_union_eq_union Finset.disjUnion_eq_union
theorem mem_union_left (t : Finset α) (h : a ∈ s) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inl h
#align finset.mem_union_left Finset.mem_union_left
theorem mem_union_right (s : Finset α) (h : a ∈ t) : a ∈ s ∪ t :=
mem_union.2 <| Or.inr h
#align finset.mem_union_right Finset.mem_union_right
theorem forall_mem_union {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s ∪ t, p a) ↔ (∀ a ∈ s, p a) ∧ ∀ a ∈ t, p a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun a => h a ∘ mem_union_left _, fun b => h b ∘ mem_union_right _⟩,
fun h _ab hab => (mem_union.mp hab).elim (h.1 _) (h.2 _)⟩
#align finset.forall_mem_union Finset.forall_mem_union
theorem not_mem_union : a ∉ s ∪ t ↔ a ∉ s ∧ a ∉ t := by rw [mem_union, not_or]
#align finset.not_mem_union Finset.not_mem_union
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_union (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∪ s₂) = (s₁ ∪ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_union
#align finset.coe_union Finset.coe_union
theorem union_subset (hs : s ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u → s ∪ t ⊆ u :=
sup_le <| le_iff_subset.2 hs
#align finset.union_subset Finset.union_subset
theorem subset_union_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_left _
#align finset.subset_union_left Finset.subset_union_left
theorem subset_union_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₂ ⊆ s₁ ∪ s₂ := fun _x => mem_union_right _
#align finset.subset_union_right Finset.subset_union_right
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union (hsu : s ⊆ u) (htv : t ⊆ v) : s ∪ t ⊆ u ∪ v :=
sup_le_sup (le_iff_subset.2 hsu) htv
#align finset.union_subset_union Finset.union_subset_union
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_left (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ∪ t ⊆ s₂ ∪ t :=
union_subset_union h Subset.rfl
#align finset.union_subset_union_left Finset.union_subset_union_left
@[gcongr]
theorem union_subset_union_right (h : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ∪ t₁ ⊆ s ∪ t₂ :=
union_subset_union Subset.rfl h
#align finset.union_subset_union_right Finset.union_subset_union_right
theorem union_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ = s₂ ∪ s₁ := sup_comm _ _
#align finset.union_comm Finset.union_comm
instance : Std.Commutative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∪ s₂ ∪ s₃ = s₁ ∪ (s₂ ∪ s₃) := sup_assoc _ _ _
#align finset.union_assoc Finset.union_assoc
instance : Std.Associative (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_assoc⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_idempotent (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s := sup_idem _
#align finset.union_idempotent Finset.union_idempotent
instance : Std.IdempotentOp (α := Finset α) (· ∪ ·) :=
⟨union_idempotent⟩
theorem union_subset_left (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : s ⊆ u :=
subset_union_left.trans h
#align finset.union_subset_left Finset.union_subset_left
theorem union_subset_right {s t u : Finset α} (h : s ∪ t ⊆ u) : t ⊆ u :=
Subset.trans subset_union_right h
#align finset.union_subset_right Finset.union_subset_right
theorem union_left_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ (t ∪ u) = t ∪ (s ∪ u) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_union, or_left_comm]
#align finset.union_left_comm Finset.union_left_comm
theorem union_right_comm (s t u : Finset α) : s ∪ t ∪ u = s ∪ u ∪ t :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_union, or_assoc, @or_comm (x ∈ t)]
#align finset.union_right_comm Finset.union_right_comm
theorem union_self (s : Finset α) : s ∪ s = s :=
union_idempotent s
#align finset.union_self Finset.union_self
@[simp]
theorem union_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∪ ∅ = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.union_empty Finset.union_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_union (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∪ s = s :=
ext fun x => mem_union.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_union Finset.empty_union
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inl {s t : Finset α} (h : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_left
@[aesop unsafe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
theorem Nonempty.inr {s t : Finset α} (h : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
h.mono subset_union_right
theorem insert_eq (a : α) (s : Finset α) : insert a s = {a} ∪ s :=
rfl
#align finset.insert_eq Finset.insert_eq
@[simp]
theorem insert_union (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : insert a s ∪ t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_assoc]
#align finset.insert_union Finset.insert_union
@[simp]
theorem union_insert (a : α) (s t : Finset α) : s ∪ insert a t = insert a (s ∪ t) := by
simp only [insert_eq, union_left_comm]
#align finset.union_insert Finset.union_insert
theorem insert_union_distrib (a : α) (s t : Finset α) :
insert a (s ∪ t) = insert a s ∪ insert a t := by
simp only [insert_union, union_insert, insert_idem]
#align finset.insert_union_distrib Finset.insert_union_distrib
@[simp] lemma union_eq_left : s ∪ t = s ↔ t ⊆ s := sup_eq_left
#align finset.union_eq_left_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_left
@[simp] lemma left_eq_union : s = s ∪ t ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_left]
#align finset.left_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.left_eq_union
@[simp] lemma union_eq_right : s ∪ t = t ↔ s ⊆ t := sup_eq_right
#align finset.union_eq_right_iff_subset Finset.union_eq_right
@[simp] lemma right_eq_union : s = t ∪ s ↔ t ⊆ s := by rw [eq_comm, union_eq_right]
#align finset.right_eq_union_iff_subset Finset.right_eq_union
-- Porting note: replaced `⊔` in RHS
theorem union_congr_left (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) (hu : u ⊆ s ∪ t) : s ∪ t = s ∪ u :=
sup_congr_left ht hu
#align finset.union_congr_left Finset.union_congr_left
theorem union_congr_right (hs : s ⊆ t ∪ u) (ht : t ⊆ s ∪ u) : s ∪ u = t ∪ u :=
sup_congr_right hs ht
#align finset.union_congr_right Finset.union_congr_right
theorem union_eq_union_iff_left : s ∪ t = s ∪ u ↔ t ⊆ s ∪ u ∧ u ⊆ s ∪ t :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_left
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_left Finset.union_eq_union_iff_left
theorem union_eq_union_iff_right : s ∪ u = t ∪ u ↔ s ⊆ t ∪ u ∧ t ⊆ s ∪ u :=
sup_eq_sup_iff_right
#align finset.union_eq_union_iff_right Finset.union_eq_union_iff_right
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_left : Disjoint (s ∪ t) u ↔ Disjoint s u ∧ Disjoint t u := by
simp only [disjoint_left, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_left Finset.disjoint_union_left
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_union_right : Disjoint s (t ∪ u) ↔ Disjoint s t ∧ Disjoint s u := by
simp only [disjoint_right, mem_union, or_imp, forall_and]
#align finset.disjoint_union_right Finset.disjoint_union_right
/-- To prove a relation on pairs of `Finset X`, it suffices to show that it is
* symmetric,
* it holds when one of the `Finset`s is empty,
* it holds for pairs of singletons,
* if it holds for `[a, c]` and for `[b, c]`, then it holds for `[a ∪ b, c]`.
-/
theorem induction_on_union (P : Finset α → Finset α → Prop) (symm : ∀ {a b}, P a b → P b a)
(empty_right : ∀ {a}, P a ∅) (singletons : ∀ {a b}, P {a} {b})
(union_of : ∀ {a b c}, P a c → P b c → P (a ∪ b) c) : ∀ a b, P a b := by
intro a b
refine Finset.induction_on b empty_right fun x s _xs hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
apply union_of _ (symm hi)
refine Finset.induction_on a empty_right fun a t _ta hi => symm ?_
rw [Finset.insert_eq]
exact union_of singletons (symm hi)
#align finset.induction_on_union Finset.induction_on_union
/-! #### inter -/
theorem inter_val_nd (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = ndinter s₁.1 s₂.1 :=
rfl
#align finset.inter_val_nd Finset.inter_val_nd
@[simp]
theorem inter_val (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : (s₁ ∩ s₂).1 = s₁.1 ∩ s₂.1 :=
ndinter_eq_inter s₁.2
#align finset.inter_val Finset.inter_val
@[simp]
theorem mem_inter {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ ↔ a ∈ s₁ ∧ a ∈ s₂ :=
mem_ndinter
#align finset.mem_inter Finset.mem_inter
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_left {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).1
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_left
theorem mem_of_mem_inter_right {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂) : a ∈ s₂ :=
(mem_inter.1 h).2
#align finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right Finset.mem_of_mem_inter_right
theorem mem_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ → a ∈ s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
and_imp.1 mem_inter.2
#align finset.mem_inter_of_mem Finset.mem_inter_of_mem
theorem inter_subset_left {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₁ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_left
#align finset.inter_subset_left Finset.inter_subset_left
theorem inter_subset_right {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} : s₁ ∩ s₂ ⊆ s₂ := fun _a => mem_of_mem_inter_right
#align finset.inter_subset_right Finset.inter_subset_right
theorem subset_inter {s₁ s₂ u : Finset α} : s₁ ⊆ s₂ → s₁ ⊆ u → s₁ ⊆ s₂ ∩ u := by
simp (config := { contextual := true }) [subset_iff, mem_inter]
#align finset.subset_inter Finset.subset_inter
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_inter (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : ↑(s₁ ∩ s₂) = (s₁ ∩ s₂ : Set α) :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_inter
#align finset.coe_inter Finset.coe_inter
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_left {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ s = s := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_left]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_left Finset.union_inter_cancel_left
@[simp]
theorem union_inter_cancel_right {s t : Finset α} : (s ∪ t) ∩ t = t := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_inter, coe_union, Set.union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.union_inter_cancel_right Finset.union_inter_cancel_right
theorem inter_comm (s₁ s₂ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₂ ∩ s₁ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_comm]
#align finset.inter_comm Finset.inter_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_assoc (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_assoc]
#align finset.inter_assoc Finset.inter_assoc
theorem inter_left_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ (s₂ ∩ s₃) = s₂ ∩ (s₁ ∩ s₃) :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_left_comm]
#align finset.inter_left_comm Finset.inter_left_comm
theorem inter_right_comm (s₁ s₂ s₃ : Finset α) : s₁ ∩ s₂ ∩ s₃ = s₁ ∩ s₃ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun _ => by simp only [mem_inter, and_right_comm]
#align finset.inter_right_comm Finset.inter_right_comm
@[simp]
theorem inter_self (s : Finset α) : s ∩ s = s :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| and_self_iff
#align finset.inter_self Finset.inter_self
@[simp]
theorem inter_empty (s : Finset α) : s ∩ ∅ = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.inter_empty Finset.inter_empty
@[simp]
theorem empty_inter (s : Finset α) : ∅ ∩ s = ∅ :=
ext fun _ => mem_inter.trans <| by simp
#align finset.empty_inter Finset.empty_inter
@[simp]
theorem inter_union_self (s t : Finset α) : s ∩ (t ∪ s) = s := by
rw [inter_comm, union_inter_cancel_right]
#align finset.inter_union_self Finset.inter_union_self
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) :=
ext fun x => by
have : x = a ∨ x ∈ s₂ ↔ x ∈ s₂ := or_iff_right_of_imp <| by rintro rfl; exact h
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_left, this]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = insert a (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem insert_inter_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₂) :
insert a s₁ ∩ s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ :=
ext fun x => by
have : ¬(x = a ∧ x ∈ s₂) := by rintro ⟨rfl, H⟩; exact h H
simp only [mem_inter, mem_insert, or_and_right, this, false_or_iff]
#align finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem Finset.insert_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_insert_of_not_mem {s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s₁) :
s₁ ∩ insert a s₂ = s₁ ∩ s₂ := by rw [inter_comm, insert_inter_of_not_mem h, inter_comm]
#align finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem Finset.inter_insert_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∈ s) : {a} ∩ s = {a} :=
show insert a ∅ ∩ s = insert a ∅ by rw [insert_inter_of_mem H, empty_inter]
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_mem
@[simp]
theorem singleton_inter_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (H : a ∉ s) : {a} ∩ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem <| by
simp only [mem_inter, mem_singleton]; rintro x ⟨rfl, h⟩; exact H h
#align finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem Finset.singleton_inter_of_not_mem
@[simp]
theorem inter_singleton_of_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∈ s) : s ∩ {a} = {a} := by
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_mem h]
#align finset.inter_singleton_of_mem Finset.inter_singleton_of_mem
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Basic.lean | 1,727 | 1,728 | theorem inter_singleton_of_not_mem {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h : a ∉ s) : s ∩ {a} = ∅ := by |
rw [inter_comm, singleton_inter_of_not_mem h]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Chris Hughes, Floris van Doorn, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr.Core
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Monotonicity.Attr
#align_import data.nat.factorial.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d012cd09a9b256d870751284dd6a29882b0be105"
/-!
# Factorial and variants
This file defines the factorial, along with the ascending and descending variants.
## Main declarations
* `Nat.factorial`: The factorial.
* `Nat.ascFactorial`: The ascending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from `n` to
`n + k - 1`.
* `Nat.descFactorial`: The descending factorial. It is the product of natural numbers from
`n - k + 1` to `n`.
-/
namespace Nat
/-- `Nat.factorial n` is the factorial of `n`. -/
def factorial : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| succ n => succ n * factorial n
#align nat.factorial Nat.factorial
/-- factorial notation `n!` -/
scoped notation:10000 n "!" => Nat.factorial n
section Factorial
variable {m n : ℕ}
@[simp] theorem factorial_zero : 0! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_zero Nat.factorial_zero
theorem factorial_succ (n : ℕ) : (n + 1)! = (n + 1) * n ! :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_succ Nat.factorial_succ
@[simp] theorem factorial_one : 1! = 1 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_one Nat.factorial_one
@[simp] theorem factorial_two : 2! = 2 :=
rfl
#align nat.factorial_two Nat.factorial_two
theorem mul_factorial_pred (hn : 0 < n) : n * (n - 1)! = n ! :=
Nat.sub_add_cancel (Nat.succ_le_of_lt hn) ▸ rfl
#align nat.mul_factorial_pred Nat.mul_factorial_pred
theorem factorial_pos : ∀ n, 0 < n !
| 0 => Nat.zero_lt_one
| succ n => Nat.mul_pos (succ_pos _) (factorial_pos n)
#align nat.factorial_pos Nat.factorial_pos
theorem factorial_ne_zero (n : ℕ) : n ! ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt (factorial_pos _)
#align nat.factorial_ne_zero Nat.factorial_ne_zero
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorial/Basic.lean | 73 | 76 | theorem factorial_dvd_factorial {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : m ! ∣ n ! := by |
induction' h with n _ ih
· exact Nat.dvd_refl _
· exact Nat.dvd_trans ih (Nat.dvd_mul_left _ _)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.PID
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.FundamentalDomain
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Module
#align_import algebra.module.zlattice from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3e83f0fa4391c8740f7d773a7a9b74e311ae2a3"
/-!
# ℤ-lattices
Let `E` be a finite dimensional vector space over a `NormedLinearOrderedField` `K` with a solid
norm that is also a `FloorRing`, e.g. `ℝ`. A (full) `ℤ`-lattice `L` of `E` is a discrete
subgroup of `E` such that `L` spans `E` over `K`.
A `ℤ`-lattice `L` can be defined in two ways:
* For `b` a basis of `E`, then `L = Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)` is a ℤ-lattice of `E`
* As an `AddSubgroup E` with the additional properties:
* `DiscreteTopology L`, that is `L` is discrete
* `Submodule.span ℝ (L : Set E) = ⊤`, that is `L` spans `E` over `K`.
Results about the first point of view are in the `Zspan` namespace and results about the second
point of view are in the `Zlattice` namespace.
## Main results
* `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`: for a ℤ-lattice `Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range b)`, proves that
the set defined by `Zspan.fundamentalDomain` is a fundamental domain.
* `Zlattice.module_free`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module
* `Zlattice.rank`: an AddSubgroup of `E` that is discrete and spans `E` over `K` is a free
`ℤ`-module of `ℤ`-rank equal to the `K`-rank of `E`
-/
noncomputable section
namespace Zspan
open MeasureTheory MeasurableSet Submodule Bornology
variable {E ι : Type*}
section NormedLatticeField
variable {K : Type*} [NormedLinearOrderedField K]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace K E]
variable (b : Basis ι K E)
theorem span_top : span K (span ℤ (Set.range b) : Set E) = ⊤ := by simp [span_span_of_tower]
/-- The fundamental domain of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b`. See `Zspan.isAddFundamentalDomain`
for the proof that it is a fundamental domain. -/
def fundamentalDomain : Set E := {m | ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1}
#align zspan.fundamental_domain Zspan.fundamentalDomain
@[simp]
theorem mem_fundamentalDomain {m : E} :
m ∈ fundamentalDomain b ↔ ∀ i, b.repr m i ∈ Set.Ico (0 : K) 1 := Iff.rfl
#align zspan.mem_fundamental_domain Zspan.mem_fundamentalDomain
theorem map_fundamentalDomain {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace K F] (f : E ≃ₗ[K] F) :
f '' (fundamentalDomain b) = fundamentalDomain (b.map f) := by
ext x
rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.map_repr, LinearEquiv.trans_apply, ← mem_fundamentalDomain,
show f.symm x = f.toEquiv.symm x by rfl, ← Set.mem_image_equiv]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fundamentalDomain_reindex {ι' : Type*} (e : ι ≃ ι') :
fundamentalDomain (b.reindex e) = fundamentalDomain b := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_fundamentalDomain, Basis.repr_reindex_apply]
rw [Equiv.forall_congr' e]
simp_rw [implies_true]
lemma fundamentalDomain_pi_basisFun [Fintype ι] :
fundamentalDomain (Pi.basisFun ℝ ι) = Set.pi Set.univ fun _ : ι ↦ Set.Ico (0 : ℝ) 1 := by
ext; simp
variable [FloorRing K]
section Fintype
variable [Fintype ι]
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding down its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def floor (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌊b.repr m i⌋ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.floor Zspan.floor
/-- The map that sends a vector of `E` to the element of the ℤ-lattice spanned by `b` obtained
by rounding up its coordinates on the basis `b`. -/
def ceil (m : E) : span ℤ (Set.range b) := ∑ i, ⌈b.repr m i⌉ • b.restrictScalars ℤ i
#align zspan.ceil Zspan.ceil
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Module/Zlattice/Basic.lean | 102 | 105 | theorem repr_floor_apply (m : E) (i : ι) : b.repr (floor b m) i = ⌊b.repr m i⌋ := by |
classical simp only [floor, zsmul_eq_smul_cast K, b.repr.map_smul, Finsupp.single_apply,
Finset.sum_apply', Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_single', mul_one, Finset.sum_ite_eq', coe_sum,
Finset.mem_univ, if_true, coe_smul_of_tower, Basis.restrictScalars_apply, map_sum]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convolution
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.EulerSineProd
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.BohrMollerup
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.IsolatedZeros
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.CauchyIntegral
#align_import analysis.special_functions.gamma.beta from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"a3209ddf94136d36e5e5c624b10b2a347cc9d090"
/-!
# The Beta function, and further properties of the Gamma function
In this file we define the Beta integral, relate Beta and Gamma functions, and prove some
refined properties of the Gamma function using these relations.
## Results on the Beta function
* `Complex.betaIntegral`: the Beta function `Β(u, v)`, where `u`, `v` are complex with positive
real part.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`: the formula
`Gamma u * Gamma v = Gamma (u + v) * betaIntegral u v`.
## Results on the Gamma function
* `Complex.Gamma_ne_zero`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ∉ {-n : n ∈ ℕ}` we have `Γ s ≠ 0`.
* `Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`: for all `s`, the limit as `n → ∞` of the sequence
`n ↦ n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))` is `Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`: Euler's reflection formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (1 - s) = π / sin π s`.
* `Complex.differentiable_one_div_Gamma`: the function `1 / Γ(s)` is differentiable everywhere.
* `Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: Legendre's duplication formula
`Gamma s * Gamma (s + 1 / 2) = Gamma (2 * s) * 2 ^ (1 - 2 * s) * √π`.
* `Real.Gamma_ne_zero`, `Real.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`,
`Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub`, `Real.Gamma_mul_Gamma_add_half`: real versions of the above.
-/
noncomputable section
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory
open scoped Nat Topology Real
section BetaIntegral
/-! ## The Beta function -/
namespace Complex
/-- The Beta function `Β (u, v)`, defined as `∫ x:ℝ in 0..1, x ^ (u - 1) * (1 - x) ^ (v - 1)`. -/
noncomputable def betaIntegral (u v : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x : ℝ in (0)..1, (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)
#align complex.beta_integral Complex.betaIntegral
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `betaIntegral_convergent`, showing convergence at the left endpoint. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent_left {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (v : ℂ) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 (1 / 2) := by
apply IntervalIntegrable.mul_continuousOn
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply ContinuousAt.continuousOn
intro x hx
rw [uIcc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ 1 / 2)] at hx
apply ContinuousAt.cpow
· exact (continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
· exact continuousAt_const
· norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| by linarith only [hx.2]
#align complex.beta_integral_convergent_left Complex.betaIntegral_convergent_left
/-- The Beta integral is convergent for all `u, v` of positive real part. -/
theorem betaIntegral_convergent {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x =>
(x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 1 := by
refine (betaIntegral_convergent_left hu v).trans ?_
rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg]
convert ((betaIntegral_convergent_left hv u).comp_add_right 1).symm using 1
· ext1 x
conv_lhs => rw [mul_comm]
congr 2 <;> · push_cast; ring
· norm_num
· norm_num
#align complex.beta_integral_convergent Complex.betaIntegral_convergent
theorem betaIntegral_symm (u v : ℂ) : betaIntegral v u = betaIntegral u v := by
rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_mul_add (a := 0) (b := 1) (c := -1)
(fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) neg_one_lt_zero.ne 1
rw [inv_neg, inv_one, neg_one_smul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_symm] at this
simp? at this says
simp only [neg_mul, one_mul, ofReal_add, ofReal_neg, ofReal_one, sub_add_cancel_right, neg_neg,
mul_one, add_left_neg, mul_zero, zero_add] at this
conv_lhs at this => arg 1; intro x; rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
exact this
#align complex.beta_integral_symm Complex.betaIntegral_symm
theorem betaIntegral_eval_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) : betaIntegral u 1 = 1 / u := by
simp_rw [betaIntegral, sub_self, cpow_zero, mul_one]
rw [integral_cpow (Or.inl _)]
· rw [ofReal_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, zero_cpow, sub_zero, sub_add_cancel]
rw [sub_add_cancel]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
· rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← sub_pos, sub_neg_eq_add, sub_add_cancel]
#align complex.beta_integral_eval_one_right Complex.betaIntegral_eval_one_right
theorem betaIntegral_scaled (s t : ℂ) {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) :
∫ x in (0)..a, (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * ((a : ℂ) - x) ^ (t - 1) =
(a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) * betaIntegral s t := by
have ha' : (a : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr ha.ne'
rw [betaIntegral]
have A : (a : ℂ) ^ (s + t - 1) = a * ((a : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (a : ℂ) ^ (t - 1)) := by
rw [(by abel : s + t - 1 = 1 + (s - 1) + (t - 1)), cpow_add _ _ ha', cpow_add 1 _ ha', cpow_one,
mul_assoc]
rw [A, mul_assoc, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, ← real_smul, ← zero_div a, ←
div_self ha.ne', ← intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div _ ha.ne', zero_div]
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le ha.le]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_mul_mul_comm]
congr 1
· rw [← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (div_pos hx.1 ha).le, ofReal_div, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
· rw [(by norm_cast : (1 : ℂ) - ↑(x / a) = ↑(1 - x / a)), ←
mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg ha.le (sub_nonneg.mpr <| (div_le_one ha).mpr hx.2)]
push_cast
rw [mul_sub, mul_one, mul_div_cancel₀ _ ha']
#align complex.beta_integral_scaled Complex.betaIntegral_scaled
/-- Relation between Beta integral and Gamma function. -/
theorem Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral {s t : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) (ht : 0 < re t) :
Gamma s * Gamma t = Gamma (s + t) * betaIntegral s t := by
-- Note that we haven't proved (yet) that the Gamma function has no zeroes, so we can't formulate
-- this as a formula for the Beta function.
have conv_int := integral_posConvolution
(GammaIntegral_convergent hs) (GammaIntegral_convergent ht) (ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℂ)
simp_rw [ContinuousLinearMap.mul_apply'] at conv_int
have hst : 0 < re (s + t) := by rw [add_re]; exact add_pos hs ht
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs, Gamma_eq_integral ht, Gamma_eq_integral hst, GammaIntegral,
GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← conv_int, ← integral_mul_right (betaIntegral _ _)]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
rw [mul_assoc, ← betaIntegral_scaled s t hx, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
congr 1 with y : 1
push_cast
suffices Complex.exp (-x) = Complex.exp (-y) * Complex.exp (-(x - y)) by rw [this]; ring
rw [← Complex.exp_add]; congr 1; abel
#align complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_beta_integral Complex.Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral
/-- Recurrence formula for the Beta function. -/
theorem betaIntegral_recurrence {u v : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (hv : 0 < re v) :
u * betaIntegral u (v + 1) = v * betaIntegral (u + 1) v := by
-- NB: If we knew `Gamma (u + v + 1) ≠ 0` this would be an easy consequence of
-- `Gamma_mul_Gamma_eq_betaIntegral`; but we don't know that yet. We will prove it later, but
-- this lemma is needed in the proof. So we give a (somewhat laborious) direct argument.
let F : ℝ → ℂ := fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ u * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ v
have hu' : 0 < re (u + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
have hv' : 0 < re (v + 1) := by rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
have hc : ContinuousOn F (Icc 0 1) := by
refine (ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx => ?_).mul (ContinuousAt.continuousOn fun x hx => ?_)
· refine (continuousAt_cpow_const_of_re_pos (Or.inl ?_) hu).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
rw [ofReal_re]; exact hx.1
· refine (continuousAt_cpow_const_of_re_pos (Or.inl ?_) hv).comp
(continuous_const.sub continuous_ofReal).continuousAt
rw [sub_re, one_re, ofReal_re, sub_nonneg]
exact hx.2
have hder : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo (0 : ℝ) 1 →
HasDerivAt F (u * ((x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1) * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ v) -
v * ((x : ℂ) ^ u * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have U : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => y ^ u) (u * (x : ℂ) ^ (u - 1)) ↑x := by
have := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ u (hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)) (Or.inl ?_)
· simp only [id_eq, mul_one] at this
exact this
· rw [id_eq, ofReal_re]; exact hx.1
have V : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => (1 - y) ^ v) (-v * (1 - (x : ℂ)) ^ (v - 1)) ↑x := by
have A := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ v (hasDerivAt_id (1 - (x : ℂ))) (Or.inl ?_)
swap; · rw [id, sub_re, one_re, ofReal_re, sub_pos]; exact hx.2
simp_rw [id] at A
have B : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => 1 - y) (-1) ↑x := by
apply HasDerivAt.const_sub; apply hasDerivAt_id
convert HasDerivAt.comp (↑x) A B using 1
ring
convert (U.mul V).comp_ofReal using 1
ring
have h_int := ((betaIntegral_convergent hu hv').const_mul u).sub
((betaIntegral_convergent hu' hv).const_mul v)
rw [add_sub_cancel_right, add_sub_cancel_right] at h_int
have int_ev := intervalIntegral.integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le zero_le_one hc hder h_int
have hF0 : F 0 = 0 := by
simp only [F, mul_eq_zero, ofReal_zero, cpow_eq_zero_iff, eq_self_iff_true, Ne,
true_and_iff, sub_zero, one_cpow, one_ne_zero, or_false_iff]
contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
have hF1 : F 1 = 0 := by
simp only [F, mul_eq_zero, ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_ne_zero, sub_self, cpow_eq_zero_iff,
eq_self_iff_true, Ne, true_and_iff, false_or_iff]
contrapose! hv; rw [hv, zero_re]
rw [hF0, hF1, sub_zero, intervalIntegral.integral_sub, intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul,
intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul] at int_ev
· rw [betaIntegral, betaIntegral, ← sub_eq_zero]
convert int_ev <;> ring
· apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
convert betaIntegral_convergent hu hv'; ring
· apply IntervalIntegrable.const_mul
convert betaIntegral_convergent hu' hv; ring
#align complex.beta_integral_recurrence Complex.betaIntegral_recurrence
/-- Explicit formula for the Beta function when second argument is a positive integer. -/
theorem betaIntegral_eval_nat_add_one_right {u : ℂ} (hu : 0 < re u) (n : ℕ) :
betaIntegral u (n + 1) = n ! / ∏ j ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (u + j) := by
induction' n with n IH generalizing u
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, betaIntegral_eval_one_right hu, Nat.factorial_zero, Nat.cast_one]
simp
· have := betaIntegral_recurrence hu (?_ : 0 < re n.succ)
swap; · rw [← ofReal_natCast, ofReal_re]; positivity
rw [mul_comm u _, ← eq_div_iff] at this
swap; · contrapose! hu; rw [hu, zero_re]
rw [this, Finset.prod_range_succ', Nat.cast_succ, IH]
swap; · rw [add_re, one_re]; positivity
rw [Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, ←
mul_div_assoc, ← div_div]
congr 3 with j : 1
push_cast; abel
#align complex.beta_integral_eval_nat_add_one_right Complex.betaIntegral_eval_nat_add_one_right
end Complex
end BetaIntegral
section LimitFormula
/-! ## The Euler limit formula -/
namespace Complex
/-- The sequence with `n`-th term `n ^ s * n! / (s * (s + 1) * ... * (s + n))`, for complex `s`.
We will show that this tends to `Γ(s)` as `n → ∞`. -/
noncomputable def GammaSeq (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) :=
(n : ℂ) ^ s * n ! / ∏ j ∈ Finset.range (n + 1), (s + j)
#align complex.Gamma_seq Complex.GammaSeq
theorem GammaSeq_eq_betaIntegral_of_re_pos {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) (n : ℕ) :
GammaSeq s n = (n : ℂ) ^ s * betaIntegral s (n + 1) := by
rw [GammaSeq, betaIntegral_eval_nat_add_one_right hs n, ← mul_div_assoc]
#align complex.Gamma_seq_eq_beta_integral_of_re_pos Complex.GammaSeq_eq_betaIntegral_of_re_pos
theorem GammaSeq_add_one_left (s : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq (s + 1) n / s = n / (n + 1 + s) * GammaSeq s n := by
conv_lhs => rw [GammaSeq, Finset.prod_range_succ, div_div]
conv_rhs =>
rw [GammaSeq, Finset.prod_range_succ', Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, div_mul_div_comm, ← mul_assoc,
← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (Finset.prod _ _)]
congr 3
· rw [cpow_add _ _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn), cpow_one, mul_comm]
· refine Finset.prod_congr (by rfl) fun x _ => ?_
push_cast; ring
· abel
#align complex.Gamma_seq_add_one_left Complex.GammaSeq_add_one_left
theorem GammaSeq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq s n = ∫ x : ℝ in (0)..n, ↑((1 - x / n) ^ n) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) := by
have : ∀ x : ℝ, x = x / n * n := by intro x; rw [div_mul_cancel₀]; exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
conv_rhs => enter [1, x, 2, 1]; rw [this x]
rw [GammaSeq_eq_betaIntegral_of_re_pos hs]
have := intervalIntegral.integral_comp_div (a := 0) (b := n)
(fun x => ↑((1 - x) ^ n) * ↑(x * ↑n) ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn)
dsimp only at this
rw [betaIntegral, this, real_smul, zero_div, div_self, add_sub_cancel_right,
← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul, ← intervalIntegral.integral_const_mul]
swap; · exact Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
simp_rw [intervalIntegral.integral_of_le zero_le_one]
refine setIntegral_congr measurableSet_Ioc fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
have hn' : (n : ℂ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn
have A : (n : ℂ) ^ s = (n : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * n := by
conv_lhs => rw [(by ring : s = s - 1 + 1), cpow_add _ _ hn']
simp
have B : ((x : ℂ) * ↑n) ^ (s - 1) = (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) * (n : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast,
mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hx.1.le (Nat.cast_pos.mpr (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)).le]
rw [A, B, cpow_natCast]; ring
#align complex.Gamma_seq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral Complex.GammaSeq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral
/-- The main techical lemma for `GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma`, expressing the integral defining the
Gamma function for `0 < re s` as the limit of a sequence of integrals over finite intervals. -/
theorem approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < re s) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ∫ x : ℝ in (0)..n, ((1 - x / n) ^ n : ℝ) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)) atTop
(𝓝 <| Gamma s) := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
-- We apply dominated convergence to the following function, which we will show is uniformly
-- bounded above by the Gamma integrand `exp (-x) * x ^ (re s - 1)`.
let f : ℕ → ℝ → ℂ := fun n =>
indicator (Ioc 0 (n : ℝ)) fun x : ℝ => ((1 - x / n) ^ n : ℝ) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)
-- integrability of f
have f_ible : ∀ n : ℕ, Integrable (f n) (volume.restrict (Ioi 0)) := by
intro n
rw [integrable_indicator_iff (measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc (_ : ℝ) _)), IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Ioi_self, ← IntegrableOn, ←
intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le (by positivity : (0 : ℝ) ≤ n)]
apply IntervalIntegrable.continuousOn_mul
· refine intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_cpow' ?_
rwa [sub_re, one_re, ← zero_sub, sub_lt_sub_iff_right]
· apply Continuous.continuousOn
exact RCLike.continuous_ofReal.comp -- Porting note: was `continuity`
((continuous_const.sub (continuous_id'.div_const ↑n)).pow n)
-- pointwise limit of f
have f_tends : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioi (0 : ℝ) →
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => f n x) atTop (𝓝 <| ↑(Real.exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1)) := by
intro x hx
apply Tendsto.congr'
· show ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, ↑((1 - x / n) ^ n) * (x : ℂ) ^ (s - 1) = f n x
filter_upwards [eventually_ge_atTop ⌈x⌉₊] with n hn
rw [Nat.ceil_le] at hn
dsimp only [f]
rw [indicator_of_mem]
exact ⟨hx, hn⟩
· simp_rw [mul_comm]
refine (Tendsto.comp (continuous_ofReal.tendsto _) ?_).const_mul _
convert tendsto_one_plus_div_pow_exp (-x) using 1
ext1 n
rw [neg_div, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
-- let `convert` identify the remaining goals
convert tendsto_integral_of_dominated_convergence _ (fun n => (f_ible n).1)
(Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs) _
((ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr (ae_of_all _ f_tends)) using 1
-- limit of f is the integrand we want
· ext1 n
rw [integral_indicator (measurableSet_Ioc : MeasurableSet (Ioc (_ : ℝ) _)),
intervalIntegral.integral_of_le (by positivity : 0 ≤ (n : ℝ)),
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset Ioc_subset_Ioi_self]
-- f is uniformly bounded by the Gamma integrand
· intro n
rw [ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi]
filter_upwards with x hx
dsimp only [f]
rcases lt_or_le (n : ℝ) x with (hxn | hxn)
· rw [indicator_of_not_mem (not_mem_Ioc_of_gt hxn), norm_zero,
mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact rpow_nonneg (le_of_lt hx) _
· rw [indicator_of_mem (mem_Ioc.mpr ⟨mem_Ioi.mp hx, hxn⟩), norm_mul, Complex.norm_eq_abs,
Complex.abs_of_nonneg
(pow_nonneg (sub_nonneg.mpr <| div_le_one_of_le hxn <| by positivity) _),
Complex.norm_eq_abs, abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx, sub_re, one_re,
mul_le_mul_right (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)]
exact one_sub_div_pow_le_exp_neg hxn
#align complex.approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral Complex.approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral
/-- Euler's limit formula for the complex Gamma function. -/
theorem GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma (s : ℂ) : Tendsto (GammaSeq s) atTop (𝓝 <| Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ m : ℕ, -↑m < re s → Tendsto (GammaSeq s) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaAux m s) by
rw [Gamma]
apply this
rw [neg_lt]
rcases lt_or_le 0 (re s) with (hs | hs)
· exact (neg_neg_of_pos hs).trans_le (Nat.cast_nonneg _)
· refine (Nat.lt_floor_add_one _).trans_le ?_
rw [sub_eq_neg_add, Nat.floor_add_one (neg_nonneg.mpr hs), Nat.cast_add_one]
intro m
induction' m with m IH generalizing s
· -- Base case: `0 < re s`, so Gamma is given by the integral formula
intro hs
rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
rw [← Gamma_eq_GammaAux]
· refine Tendsto.congr' ?_ (approx_Gamma_integral_tendsto_Gamma_integral hs)
refine (eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun n hn => ?_)
exact (GammaSeq_eq_approx_Gamma_integral hs hn).symm
· rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_lt_zero]
· -- Induction step: use recurrence formulae in `s` for Gamma and GammaSeq
intro hs
rw [Nat.cast_succ, neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_lt_iff_lt_add, ← one_re, ← add_re] at hs
rw [GammaAux]
have := @Tendsto.congr' _ _ _ ?_ _ _
((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun n hn => ?_)) ((IH _ hs).div_const s)
pick_goal 3; · exact GammaSeq_add_one_left s hn -- doesn't work if inlined?
conv at this => arg 1; intro n; rw [mul_comm]
rwa [← mul_one (GammaAux m (s + 1) / s), tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero _ (one_ne_zero' ℂ)] at this
simp_rw [add_assoc]
exact tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop (1 + s)
#align complex.Gamma_seq_tendsto_Gamma Complex.GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma
end Complex
end LimitFormula
section GammaReflection
/-! ## The reflection formula -/
namespace Complex
theorem GammaSeq_mul (z : ℂ) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
GammaSeq z n * GammaSeq (1 - z) n =
n / (n + ↑1 - z) * (↑1 / (z * ∏ j ∈ Finset.range n, (↑1 - z ^ 2 / ((j : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2))) := by
-- also true for n = 0 but we don't need it
have aux : ∀ a b c d : ℂ, a * b * (c * d) = a * c * (b * d) := by intros; ring
rw [GammaSeq, GammaSeq, div_mul_div_comm, aux, ← pow_two]
have : (n : ℂ) ^ z * (n : ℂ) ^ (1 - z) = n := by
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn), add_sub_cancel, cpow_one]
rw [this, Finset.prod_range_succ', Finset.prod_range_succ, aux, ← Finset.prod_mul_distrib,
Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, add_comm (1 - z) n, ← add_sub_assoc]
have : ∀ j : ℕ, (z + ↑(j + 1)) * (↑1 - z + ↑j) =
((j + 1) ^ 2 :) * (↑1 - z ^ 2 / ((j : ℂ) + 1) ^ 2) := by
intro j
push_cast
have : (j : ℂ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by rw [← Nat.cast_succ, Nat.cast_ne_zero]; exact Nat.succ_ne_zero j
field_simp; ring
simp_rw [this]
rw [Finset.prod_mul_distrib, ← Nat.cast_prod, Finset.prod_pow,
Finset.prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial, Nat.cast_pow,
(by intros; ring : ∀ a b c d : ℂ, a * b * (c * d) = a * (d * (b * c))), ← div_div,
mul_div_cancel_right₀, ← div_div, mul_comm z _, mul_one_div]
exact pow_ne_zero 2 (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.factorial_ne_zero n)
#align complex.Gamma_seq_mul Complex.GammaSeq_mul
/-- Euler's reflection formula for the complex Gamma function. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Beta.lean | 422 | 445 | theorem Gamma_mul_Gamma_one_sub (z : ℂ) : Gamma z * Gamma (1 - z) = π / sin (π * z) := by |
have pi_ne : (π : ℂ) ≠ 0 := Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_ne_zero
by_cases hs : sin (↑π * z) = 0
· -- first deal with silly case z = integer
rw [hs, div_zero]
rw [← neg_eq_zero, ← Complex.sin_neg, ← mul_neg, Complex.sin_eq_zero_iff, mul_comm] at hs
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hs
rw [mul_eq_mul_right_iff, eq_false (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr pi_pos.ne'), or_false_iff,
neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hk
rw [hk]
cases k
· rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero, zero_mul]
· rw [Int.cast_negSucc, neg_neg, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_comm, sub_add_cancel_left,
Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero, mul_zero]
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ((GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma z).mul (GammaSeq_tendsto_Gamma <| 1 - z)) ?_
have : ↑π / sin (↑π * z) = 1 * (π / sin (π * z)) := by rw [one_mul]
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (eventually_of_forall fun n hn =>
(GammaSeq_mul z hn).symm)) (Tendsto.mul _ _)
· convert tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop (1 - z) using 1; ext1 n; rw [add_sub_assoc]
· have : ↑π / sin (↑π * z) = 1 / (sin (π * z) / π) := by field_simp
convert tendsto_const_nhds.div _ (div_ne_zero hs pi_ne)
rw [← tendsto_mul_iff_of_ne_zero tendsto_const_nhds pi_ne, div_mul_cancel₀ _ pi_ne]
convert tendsto_euler_sin_prod z using 1
ext1 n; rw [mul_comm, ← mul_assoc]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
#align_import order.heyting.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"9ac7c0c8c4d7a535ec3e5b34b8859aab9233b2f4"
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_himp fst_himp
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_himp snd_himp
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_hnot fst_hnot
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_hnot snd_hnot
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
#align fst_sdiff fst_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
#align snd_sdiff snd_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
#align fst_compl fst_compl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
#align snd_compl snd_compl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_def Pi.himp_def
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_def Pi.hnot_def
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
#align pi.himp_apply Pi.himp_apply
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
#align pi.hnot_apply Pi.hnot_apply
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
#align generalized_heyting_algebra GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_order_top GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
#align generalized_coheyting_algebra.to_order_bot GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `a ⇨` is right adjoint to `a ⊓` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
#align heyting_algebra HeytingAlgebra
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align coheyting_algebra CoheytingAlgebra
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `\ a` is right adjoint to `⊔ a` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
#align biheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
--#align heyting_algebra.to_bounded_order HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align coheyting_algebra.to_bounded_order CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
#align biheyting_algebra.to_coheyting_algebra BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun a => rfl }
#align heyting_algebra.of_himp HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
#align heyting_algebra.of_compl HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun a => rfl }
#align coheyting_algebra.of_sdiff CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
#align coheyting_algebra.of_hnot CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
#align le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
#align le_himp_iff' le_himp_iff'
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
#align le_himp_comm le_himp_comm
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
#align le_himp le_himp
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
#align le_himp_iff_left le_himp_iff_left
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
#align himp_self himp_self
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
#align himp_inf_le himp_inf_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
#align inf_himp_le inf_himp_le
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
#align inf_himp inf_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_inf_self himp_inf_self
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
#align himp_eq_top_iff himp_eq_top_iff
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
#align himp_top himp_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
#align top_himp top_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
#align himp_himp himp_himp
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
#align himp_le_himp_himp_himp himp_le_himp_himp_himp
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
#align himp_left_comm himp_left_comm
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
#align himp_idem himp_idem
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
#align himp_inf_distrib himp_inf_distrib
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
#align sup_himp_distrib sup_himp_distrib
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
#align himp_le_himp_left himp_le_himp_left
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
#align himp_le_himp_right himp_le_himp_right
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
#align himp_le_himp himp_le_himp
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_left sup_himp_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
#align sup_himp_self_right sup_himp_self_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_right Codisjoint.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_eq_left Codisjoint.himp_eq_left
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
#align codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
#align codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
#align le_himp_himp le_himp_himp
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
#align himp_triangle himp_triangle
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
#align himp_inf_himp_cancel himp_inf_himp_cancel
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
#align generalized_heyting_algebra.to_distrib_lattice GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
#align prod.generalized_heyting_algebra Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
#align pi.generalized_heyting_algebra Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
#align sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_le_iff' sdiff_le_iff'
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
#align sdiff_le_comm sdiff_le_comm
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
#align sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
#align disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_le_iff_left sdiff_le_iff_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
#align sdiff_self sdiff_self
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
#align le_sup_sdiff le_sup_sdiff
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
#align le_sdiff_sup le_sdiff_sup
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_left sup_sdiff_left
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align sup_sdiff_right sup_sdiff_right
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_left inf_sdiff_left
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
#align inf_sdiff_right inf_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
#align sup_sdiff_self sup_sdiff_self
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_sup_self sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_left sup_sdiff_self_left
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
#align sup_sdiff_self_right sup_sdiff_self_right
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sup_sdiff_eq_sup sup_sdiff_eq_sup
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
#align sup_sdiff_cancel' sup_sdiff_cancel'
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
#align sup_sdiff_cancel_right sup_sdiff_cancel_right
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
#align sdiff_sup_cancel sdiff_sup_cancel
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
#align sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_eq_bot_iff sdiff_eq_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_bot sdiff_bot
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
#align bot_sdiff bot_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
#align sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
#align sdiff_sdiff sdiff_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_left sdiff_sdiff_left
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
#align sdiff_right_comm sdiff_right_comm
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
#align sdiff_sdiff_comm sdiff_sdiff_comm
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
#align sdiff_idem sdiff_idem
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
#align sdiff_sdiff_self sdiff_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
#align sup_sdiff_distrib sup_sdiff_distrib
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
#align sdiff_inf_distrib sdiff_inf_distrib
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
#align sup_sdiff sup_sdiff
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sup_sdiff_right_self sup_sdiff_right_self
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
#align sup_sdiff_left_self sup_sdiff_left_self
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_right sdiff_le_sdiff_right
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
#align sdiff_le_sdiff_left sdiff_le_sdiff_left
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
#align sdiff_le_sdiff sdiff_le_sdiff
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
#align sdiff_inf sdiff_inf
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_left sdiff_inf_self_left
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
#align sdiff_inf_self_right sdiff_inf_self_right
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 632 | 634 | theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by |
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Scott Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupPower.IterateHom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
#align_import data.polynomial.derivative from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bbeb185db4ccee8ed07dc48449414ebfa39cb821"
/-!
# The derivative map on polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.derivative`: The formal derivative of polynomials, expressed as a linear map.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `derivative p` is the formal derivative of the polynomial `p` -/
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
dsimp only
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
#align polynomial.derivative Polynomial.derivative
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
#align polynomial.derivative_apply Polynomial.derivative_apply
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
#align polynomial.coeff_derivative Polynomial.coeff_derivative
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
#align polynomial.derivative_zero Polynomial.derivative_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
#align polynomial.derivative_monomial Polynomial.derivative_monomial
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_pow
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_C_mul_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_pow Polynomial.derivative_X_pow
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_sq Polynomial.derivative_X_sq
@[simp]
theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by simp [derivative_apply]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_C Polynomial.derivative_C
theorem derivative_of_natDegree_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree = 0) : derivative p = 0 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hp, derivative_C]
#align polynomial.derivative_of_nat_degree_zero Polynomial.derivative_of_natDegree_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X : derivative (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
(derivative_monomial _ _).trans <| by simp
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X Polynomial.derivative_X
@[simp]
theorem derivative_one : derivative (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_one Polynomial.derivative_one
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit0
#noalign polynomial.derivative_bit1
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_add {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f + g) = derivative f + derivative g :=
derivative.map_add f g
#align polynomial.derivative_add Polynomial.derivative_add
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_X_add_C (c : R) : derivative (X + C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.derivative_X_add_C Polynomial.derivative_X_add_C
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_sum {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative (f b) :=
map_sum ..
#align polynomial.derivative_sum Polynomial.derivative_sum
-- Porting note (#10618): removed `simp`: `simp` can prove it.
theorem derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S)
(p : R[X]) : derivative (s • p) = s • derivative p :=
derivative.map_smul_of_tower s p
#align polynomial.derivative_smul Polynomial.derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S R] [IsScalarTower S R R]
(s : S) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) : derivative^[k] (s • p) = s • derivative^[k] p := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp [ih]
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_smul
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (C a * p) = C a * derivative^[k] p := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_C_mul, iterate_derivative_smul]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul Polynomial.iterate_derivative_C_mul
theorem of_mem_support_derivative {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ p.derivative.support) :
n + 1 ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.2 fun h1 : p.coeff (n + 1) = 0 =>
mem_support_iff.1 h <| show p.derivative.coeff n = 0 by rw [coeff_derivative, h1, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative Polynomial.of_mem_support_derivative
theorem degree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.derivative.degree < p.degree :=
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 <| mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp).2 fun n hp =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.lt_succ_self) <|
Finset.le_sup <| of_mem_support_derivative hp
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_lt Polynomial.degree_derivative_lt
theorem degree_derivative_le {p : R[X]} : p.derivative.degree ≤ p.degree :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p = 0 then le_of_eq <| by rw [H, derivative_zero] else (degree_derivative_lt H).le
#align polynomial.degree_derivative_le Polynomial.degree_derivative_le
theorem natDegree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
p.derivative.natDegree < p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne (derivative p) 0 with hp' | hp'
· rw [hp', Polynomial.natDegree_zero]
exact hp.bot_lt
· rw [natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hp']
exact degree_derivative_lt fun h => hp (h.symm ▸ natDegree_zero)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_derivative_lt Polynomial.natDegree_derivative_lt
theorem natDegree_derivative_le (p : R[X]) : p.derivative.natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - 1 := by
by_cases p0 : p.natDegree = 0
· simp [p0, derivative_of_natDegree_zero]
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (natDegree_derivative_lt p0)
#align polynomial.nat_degree_derivative_le Polynomial.natDegree_derivative_le
theorem natDegree_iterate_derivative (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ d hd =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Nat.sub_succ']
exact (natDegree_derivative_le _).trans <| Nat.sub_le_sub_right hd 1
@[simp]
theorem derivative_natCast {n : ℕ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← map_natCast C n]
exact derivative_C
#align polynomial.derivative_nat_cast Polynomial.derivative_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias derivative_nat_cast := derivative_natCast
-- Porting note (#10756): new theorem
@[simp]
theorem derivative_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
derivative (no_index (OfNat.ofNat n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_natCast
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {x : ℕ} (hx : p.natDegree < x) :
Polynomial.derivative^[x] p = 0 := by
induction' h : p.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with _ ih generalizing p x
subst h
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_of_gt hx).ne'
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply]
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [derivative_of_natDegree_zero hp, iterate_derivative_zero]
have := natDegree_derivative_lt hp
exact ih _ this (this.trans_le <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ hx) rfl
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.iterate_derivative_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (C a : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| (natDegree_C _).trans_lt h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_C Polynomial.iterate_derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_one {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_C h
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_one Polynomial.iterate_derivative_one
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_X {k} (h : 1 < k) : derivative^[k] (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| natDegree_X_le.trans_lt h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.iterate_derivative_X Polynomial.iterate_derivative_X
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]}
(h : derivative f = 0) : f.natDegree = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with (rfl | hf)
· exact natDegree_zero
rw [natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
by_contra! f_nat_degree_pos
rw [← natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos] at f_nat_degree_pos
let m := f.natDegree - 1
have hm : m + 1 = f.natDegree := tsub_add_cancel_of_le f_nat_degree_pos
have h2 := coeff_derivative f m
rw [Polynomial.ext_iff] at h
rw [h m, coeff_zero, ← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', eq_comm, smul_eq_zero] at h2
replace h2 := h2.resolve_left m.succ_ne_zero
rw [hm, ← leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h2
exact hf h2
#align polynomial.nat_degree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero
theorem eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]} (h : derivative f = 0) :
f = C (f.coeff 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero <| natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero h
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align polynomial.eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem derivative_mul {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f * g) = derivative f * g + f * derivative g := by
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add => simp only [add_mul, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| h_monomial m a =>
induction g using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| h_add => simp only [mul_add, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| h_monomial n b =>
simp only [monomial_mul_monomial, derivative_monomial]
simp only [mul_assoc, (Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, map_add]
cases m with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => simp only [add_zero, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n 1]
#align polynomial.derivative_mul Polynomial.derivative_mul
theorem derivative_eval (p : R[X]) (x : R) :
p.derivative.eval x = p.sum fun n a => a * n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
simp_rw [derivative_apply, eval_sum, eval_mul_X_pow, eval_C]
#align polynomial.derivative_eval Polynomial.derivative_eval
@[simp]
theorem derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivative (p.map f) = p.derivative.map f := by
let n := max p.natDegree (map f p).natDegree
rw [derivative_apply, derivative_apply]
rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
on_goal 1 => rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
· simp only [Polynomial.map_sum, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_C, map_mul, coeff_map,
map_natCast, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
all_goals intro n; rw [zero_mul, C_0, zero_mul]
#align polynomial.derivative_map Polynomial.derivative_map
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 326 | 330 | theorem iterate_derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative^[k] (p.map f) = (Polynomial.derivative^[k] p).map f := by |
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp only [ih, Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.derivative_map, Function.comp_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Adjoin.Basic
#align_import topology.algebra.algebra from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"43afc5ad87891456c57b5a183e3e617d67c2b1db"
/-!
# Topological (sub)algebras
A topological algebra over a topological semiring `R` is a topological semiring with a compatible
continuous scalar multiplication by elements of `R`. We reuse typeclass `ContinuousSMul` for
topological algebras.
## Results
This is just a minimal stub for now!
The topological closure of a subalgebra is still a subalgebra,
which as an algebra is a topological algebra.
-/
open scoped Classical
open Set TopologicalSpace Algebra
open scoped Classical
universe u v w
section TopologicalAlgebra
variable (R : Type*) (A : Type u)
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [TopologicalSpace A]
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_algebraMap [ContinuousSMul R A] : Continuous (algebraMap R A) := by
rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one']
exact continuous_id.smul continuous_const
#align continuous_algebra_map continuous_algebraMap
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Algebra.lean | 47 | 51 | theorem continuous_algebraMap_iff_smul [TopologicalSemiring A] :
Continuous (algebraMap R A) ↔ Continuous fun p : R × A => p.1 • p.2 := by |
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => have : ContinuousSMul R A := ⟨h⟩; continuous_algebraMap _ _⟩
simp only [Algebra.smul_def]
exact (h.comp continuous_fst).mul continuous_snd
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Zlattice.Basic
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.Embeddings
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.FractionalIdeal
#align_import number_theory.number_field.canonical_embedding from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"60da01b41bbe4206f05d34fd70c8dd7498717a30"
/-!
# Canonical embedding of a number field
The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` is the ring homomorphism
`K →+* ℂ^n` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_₁(x),...,φ_n(x))` where the `φ_i`'s are the complex
embeddings of `K`. Note that we do not choose an ordering of the embeddings, but instead map `K`
into the type `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` of `ℂ`-vectors indexed by the complex embeddings.
## Main definitions and results
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism `K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` defined by
sending `x : K` to the vector `(φ x)` indexed by `φ : K →+* ℂ`.
* `NumberField.canonicalEmbedding.integerLattice.inter_ball_finite`: the intersection of the
image of the ring of integers by the canonical embedding and any ball centered at `0` of finite
radius is finite.
* `NumberField.mixedEmbedding`: the ring homomorphism from `K →+* ({ w // IsReal w } → ℝ) ×
({ w // IsComplex w } → ℂ)` that sends `x ∈ K` to `(φ_w x)_w` where `φ_w` is the embedding
associated to the infinite place `w`. In particular, if `w` is real then `φ_w : K →+* ℝ` and, if
`w` is complex, `φ_w` is an arbitrary choice between the two complex embeddings defining the place
`w`.
## Tags
number field, infinite places
-/
variable (K : Type*) [Field K]
namespace NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
open NumberField
/-- The canonical embedding of a number field `K` of degree `n` into `ℂ^n`. -/
def _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding : K →+* ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := Pi.ringHom fun φ => φ
theorem _root_.NumberField.canonicalEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K) := RingHom.injective _
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem apply_at (φ : K →+* ℂ) (x : K) : (NumberField.canonicalEmbedding K x) φ = φ x := rfl
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The image of `canonicalEmbedding` lives in the `ℝ`-submodule of the `x ∈ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)` such
that `conj x_φ = x_(conj φ)` for all `∀ φ : K →+* ℂ`. -/
theorem conj_apply {x : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)} (φ : K →+* ℂ)
(hx : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K))) :
conj (x φ) = x (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ) := by
refine Submodule.span_induction hx ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ hx hy => ?_) (fun a _ hx => ?_)
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [apply_at, apply_at, ComplexEmbedding.conjugate_coe_eq]
· rw [Pi.zero_apply, Pi.zero_apply, map_zero]
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Pi.add_apply, map_add, hx, hy]
· rw [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, map_mul, Complex.conj_ofReal]
exact congrArg ((a : ℂ) * ·) hx
theorem nnnorm_eq [NumberField K] (x : K) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖₊ = Finset.univ.sup (fun φ : K →+* ℂ => ‖φ x‖₊) := by
simp_rw [Pi.nnnorm_def, apply_at]
theorem norm_le_iff [NumberField K] (x : K) (r : ℝ) :
‖canonicalEmbedding K x‖ ≤ r ↔ ∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
obtain hr | hr := lt_or_le r 0
· obtain ⟨φ⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (K →+* ℂ))
refine iff_of_false ?_ ?_
· exact (hr.trans_le (norm_nonneg _)).not_le
· exact fun h => hr.not_le (le_trans (norm_nonneg _) (h φ))
· lift r to NNReal using hr
simp_rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq, NNReal.coe_le_coe, Finset.sup_le_iff, Finset.mem_univ,
forall_true_left]
variable (K)
/-- The image of `𝓞 K` as a subring of `ℂ^n`. -/
def integerLattice : Subring ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) :=
(RingHom.range (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).map (canonicalEmbedding K)
theorem integerLattice.inter_ball_finite [NumberField K] (r : ℝ) :
((integerLattice K : Set ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)) ∩ Metric.closedBall 0 r).Finite := by
obtain hr | _ := lt_or_le r 0
· simp [Metric.closedBall_eq_empty.2 hr]
· have heq : ∀ x, canonicalEmbedding K x ∈ Metric.closedBall 0 r ↔
∀ φ : K →+* ℂ, ‖φ x‖ ≤ r := by
intro x; rw [← norm_le_iff, mem_closedBall_zero_iff]
convert (Embeddings.finite_of_norm_le K ℂ r).image (canonicalEmbedding K)
ext; constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨_, ⟨x, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, hx⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨SetLike.coe_mem x, fun φ => (heq _).mp hx φ⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, ⟨hx1, hx2⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟨x, hx1⟩, rfl⟩, rfl⟩, (heq x).mpr hx2⟩
open Module Fintype FiniteDimensional
/-- A `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` that is also a `ℤ`-basis of the `integerLattice`. -/
noncomputable def latticeBasis [NumberField K] :
Basis (Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ℂ ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) := by
classical
-- Let `B` be the canonical basis of `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ`. We prove that the determinant of
-- the image by `canonicalEmbedding` of the integral basis of `K` is nonzero. This
-- will imply the result.
let B := Pi.basisFun ℂ (K →+* ℂ)
let e : (K →+* ℂ) ≃ Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
equivOfCardEq ((Embeddings.card K ℂ).trans (finrank_eq_card_basis (integralBasis K)))
let M := B.toMatrix (fun i => canonicalEmbedding K (integralBasis K (e i)))
suffices M.det ≠ 0 by
rw [← isUnit_iff_ne_zero, ← Basis.det_apply, ← is_basis_iff_det] at this
refine basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank
((linearIndependent_equiv e.symm).mpr this.1) ?_
rw [← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, RingOfIntegers.rank, finrank_fintype_fun_eq_card,
Embeddings.card]
-- In order to prove that the determinant is nonzero, we show that it is equal to the
-- square of the discriminant of the integral basis and thus it is not zero
let N := Algebra.embeddingsMatrixReindex ℚ ℂ (fun i => integralBasis K (e i))
RingHom.equivRatAlgHom
rw [show M = N.transpose by { ext:2; rfl }]
rw [Matrix.det_transpose, ← pow_ne_zero_iff two_ne_zero]
convert (map_ne_zero_iff _ (algebraMap ℚ ℂ).injective).mpr
(Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K))
rw [← Algebra.discr_reindex ℚ (integralBasis K) e.symm]
exact (Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two ℚ ℂ
(fun i => integralBasis K (e i)) RingHom.equivRatAlgHom).symm
@[simp]
theorem latticeBasis_apply [NumberField K] (i : Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
latticeBasis K i = (canonicalEmbedding K) (integralBasis K i) := by
simp only [latticeBasis, integralBasis_apply, coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank,
Function.comp_apply, Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
theorem mem_span_latticeBasis [NumberField K] (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) :
x ∈ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) ↔
x ∈ ((canonicalEmbedding K).comp (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).range := by
rw [show Set.range (latticeBasis K) =
(canonicalEmbedding K).toIntAlgHom.toLinearMap '' (Set.range (integralBasis K)) by
rw [← Set.range_comp]; exact congrArg Set.range (funext (fun i => latticeBasis_apply K i))]
rw [← Submodule.map_span, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.map_coe]
rw [← RingHom.map_range, Subring.mem_map, Set.mem_image]
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, mem_span_integralBasis K]
rfl
end NumberField.canonicalEmbedding
namespace NumberField.mixedEmbedding
open NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace FiniteDimensional Finset
/-- The space `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` with `(r₁, r₂)` the signature of `K`. -/
local notation "E" K =>
({w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} → ℂ)
/-- The mixed embedding of a number field `K` of signature `(r₁, r₂)` into `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`. -/
noncomputable def _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding : K →+* (E K) :=
RingHom.prod (Pi.ringHom fun w => embedding_of_isReal w.prop)
(Pi.ringHom fun w => w.val.embedding)
instance [NumberField K] : Nontrivial (E K) := by
obtain ⟨w⟩ := (inferInstance : Nonempty (InfinitePlace K))
obtain hw | hw := w.isReal_or_isComplex
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_left
· have : Nonempty {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} := ⟨⟨w, hw⟩⟩
exact nontrivial_prod_right
protected theorem finrank [NumberField K] : finrank ℝ (E K) = finrank ℚ K := by
classical
rw [finrank_prod, finrank_pi, finrank_pi_fintype, Complex.finrank_real_complex, sum_const,
card_univ, ← NrRealPlaces, ← NrComplexPlaces, ← card_real_embeddings, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
mul_comm, ← card_complex_embeddings, ← NumberField.Embeddings.card K ℂ,
Fintype.card_subtype_compl, Nat.add_sub_of_le (Fintype.card_subtype_le _)]
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding_injective [NumberField K] :
Function.Injective (NumberField.mixedEmbedding K) := by
exact RingHom.injective _
section commMap
/-- The linear map that makes `canonicalEmbedding` and `mixedEmbedding` commute, see
`commMap_canonical_eq_mixed`. -/
noncomputable def commMap : ((K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) →ₗ[ℝ] (E K) where
toFun := fun x => ⟨fun w => (x w.val.embedding).re, fun w => x w.val.embedding⟩
map_add' := by
simp only [Pi.add_apply, Complex.add_re, Prod.mk_add_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
map_smul' := by
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Complex.real_smul, Complex.mul_re, Complex.ofReal_re,
Complex.ofReal_im, zero_mul, sub_zero, RingHom.id_apply, Prod.smul_mk, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact fun _ _ => ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem commMap_apply_of_isReal (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) :
(commMap K x).1 ⟨w, hw⟩ = (x w.embedding).re := rfl
theorem commMap_apply_of_isComplex (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ) {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) :
(commMap K x).2 ⟨w, hw⟩ = x w.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem commMap_canonical_eq_mixed (x : K) :
commMap K (canonicalEmbedding K x) = mixedEmbedding K x := by
simp only [canonicalEmbedding, commMap, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk, Pi.ringHom_apply,
mixedEmbedding, RingHom.prod_apply, Prod.mk.injEq]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
/-- This is a technical result to ensure that the image of the `ℂ`-basis of `ℂ^n` defined in
`canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis` is a `ℝ`-basis of `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`,
see `mixedEmbedding.latticeBasis`. -/
theorem disjoint_span_commMap_ker [NumberField K] :
Disjoint (Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K)))
(LinearMap.ker (commMap K)) := by
refine LinearMap.disjoint_ker.mpr (fun x h_mem h_zero => ?_)
replace h_mem : x ∈ Submodule.span ℝ (Set.range (canonicalEmbedding K)) := by
refine (Submodule.span_mono ?_) h_mem
rintro _ ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨integralBasis K i, (canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis_apply K i).symm⟩
ext1 φ
rw [Pi.zero_apply]
by_cases hφ : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ
· apply Complex.ext
· rw [← embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ, ← commMap_apply_of_isReal K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
exact congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.1) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, _⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_im, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_im, canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem,
ComplexEmbedding.isReal_iff.mp hφ]
· have := congrFun (congrArg (fun x => x.2) h_zero) ⟨InfinitePlace.mk φ, ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩⟩
cases embedding_mk_eq φ with
| inl h => rwa [← h, ← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
| inr h =>
apply RingHom.injective (starRingEnd ℂ)
rwa [canonicalEmbedding.conj_apply _ h_mem, ← h, map_zero,
← commMap_apply_of_isComplex K x ⟨φ, hφ, rfl⟩]
end commMap
noncomputable section norm
open scoped Classical
variable {K}
/-- The norm at the infinite place `w` of an element of
`({w // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({ w // IsComplex w } → ℂ)`. -/
def normAtPlace (w : InfinitePlace K) : (E K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := if hw : IsReal w then ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ else ‖x.2 ⟨w, not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mp hw⟩‖
map_zero' := by simp
map_one' := by simp
map_mul' x y := by split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_nonneg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) :
0 ≤ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_nonneg _
theorem normAtPlace_neg (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) :
normAtPlace w (- x) = normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> simp
theorem normAtPlace_add_le (w : InfinitePlace K) (x y : E K) :
normAtPlace w (x + y) ≤ normAtPlace w x + normAtPlace w y := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs <;> exact norm_add_le _ _
theorem normAtPlace_smul (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : E K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w (c • x) = |c| * normAtPlace w x := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk]
split_ifs
· rw [Prod.smul_fst, Pi.smul_apply, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs]
· rw [Prod.smul_snd, Pi.smul_apply, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, Complex.norm_eq_abs]
theorem normAtPlace_real (w : InfinitePlace K) (c : ℝ) :
normAtPlace w ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = |c| := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, normAtPlace_smul, map_one,
mul_one]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_isReal {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsReal w) (x : E K):
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.1 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, dif_pos]
theorem normAtPlace_apply_isComplex {w : InfinitePlace K} (hw : IsComplex w) (x : E K) :
normAtPlace w x = ‖x.2 ⟨w, hw⟩‖ := by
rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk,
dif_neg (not_isReal_iff_isComplex.mpr hw)]
@[simp]
theorem normAtPlace_apply (w : InfinitePlace K) (x : K) :
normAtPlace w (mixedEmbedding K x) = w x := by
simp_rw [normAtPlace, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, mixedEmbedding,
RingHom.prod_apply, Pi.ringHom_apply, norm_embedding_of_isReal, norm_embedding_eq, dite_eq_ite,
ite_id]
theorem normAtPlace_eq_zero {x : E K} :
(∀ w, normAtPlace w x = 0) ↔ x = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· ext w
· exact norm_eq_zero'.mp (normAtPlace_apply_isReal w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· exact norm_eq_zero'.mp (normAtPlace_apply_isComplex w.prop _ ▸ h w.1)
· simp_rw [h, map_zero, implies_true]
variable [NumberField K]
theorem nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace (x : E K) :
‖x‖₊ = univ.sup fun w ↦ ⟨normAtPlace w x, normAtPlace_nonneg w x⟩ := by
rw [show (univ : Finset (InfinitePlace K)) = (univ.image
(fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} ↦ w.1)) ∪
(univ.image (fun w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} ↦ w.1))
by ext; simp [isReal_or_isComplex], sup_union, univ.sup_image, univ.sup_image, sup_eq_max,
Prod.nnnorm_def', Pi.nnnorm_def, Pi.nnnorm_def]
congr
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_isReal w.prop]
· ext w
simp [normAtPlace_apply_isComplex w.prop]
theorem norm_eq_sup'_normAtPlace (x : E K) :
‖x‖ = univ.sup' univ_nonempty fun w ↦ normAtPlace w x := by
rw [← coe_nnnorm, nnnorm_eq_sup_normAtPlace, ← sup'_eq_sup univ_nonempty, ← NNReal.val_eq_coe,
← OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe, map_finset_sup', OrderHom.Subtype.val_coe]
rfl
/-- The norm of `x` is `∏ w, (normAtPlace x) ^ mult w`. It is defined such that the norm of
`mixedEmbedding K a` for `a : K` is equal to the absolute value of the norm of `a` over `ℚ`,
see `norm_eq_norm`. -/
protected def norm : (E K) →*₀ ℝ where
toFun x := ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w)
map_one' := by simp only [map_one, one_pow, prod_const_one]
map_zero' := by simp [mult]
map_mul' _ _ := by simp only [map_mul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib]
protected theorem norm_apply (x : E K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = ∏ w, (normAtPlace w x) ^ (mult w) := rfl
protected theorem norm_nonneg (x : E K) :
0 ≤ mixedEmbedding.norm x := univ.prod_nonneg fun _ _ ↦ pow_nonneg (normAtPlace_nonneg _ _) _
protected theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {x : E K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = 0 ↔ ∃ w, normAtPlace w x = 0 := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm, MonoidWithZeroHom.coe_mk, ZeroHom.coe_mk, prod_eq_zero_iff,
mem_univ, true_and, pow_eq_zero_iff mult_ne_zero]
protected theorem norm_ne_zero_iff {x : E K} :
mixedEmbedding.norm x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ w, normAtPlace w x ≠ 0 := by
rw [← not_iff_not]
simp_rw [ne_eq, mixedEmbedding.norm_eq_zero_iff, not_not, not_forall, not_not]
theorem norm_smul (c : ℝ) (x : E K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (c • x) = |c| ^ finrank ℚ K * (mixedEmbedding.norm x) := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, normAtPlace_smul, mul_pow, prod_mul_distrib,
prod_pow_eq_pow_sum, sum_mult_eq]
theorem norm_real (c : ℝ) :
mixedEmbedding.norm ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = |c| ^ finrank ℚ K := by
rw [show ((fun _ ↦ c, fun _ ↦ c) : (E K)) = c • 1 by ext <;> simp, norm_smul, map_one, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_eq_norm (x : K) :
mixedEmbedding.norm (mixedEmbedding K x) = |Algebra.norm ℚ x| := by
simp_rw [mixedEmbedding.norm_apply, normAtPlace_apply, prod_eq_abs_norm]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff' {x : E K} (hx : x ∈ Set.range (mixedEmbedding K)) :
mixedEmbedding.norm x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := hx
rw [norm_eq_norm, Rat.cast_abs, abs_eq_zero, Rat.cast_eq_zero, Algebra.norm_eq_zero_iff,
map_eq_zero]
end norm
noncomputable section stdBasis
open scoped Classical
open Complex MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Zspan Matrix BigOperators Finset ComplexConjugate
variable [NumberField K]
/-- The type indexing the basis `stdBasis`. -/
abbrev index := {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w} ⊕ ({w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) × (Fin 2)
/-- The `ℝ`-basis of `({w // IsReal w} → ℝ) × ({ w // IsComplex w } → ℂ)` formed by the vector
equal to `1` at `w` and `0` elsewhere for `IsReal w` and by the couple of vectors equal to `1`
(resp. `I`) at `w` and `0` elsewhere for `IsComplex w`. -/
def stdBasis : Basis (index K) ℝ (E K) :=
Basis.prod (Pi.basisFun ℝ _)
(Basis.reindex (Pi.basis fun _ => basisOneI) (Equiv.sigmaEquivProd _ _))
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_ofIsReal (x : E K) (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inl w) = x.1 w := rfl
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_fst (x : E K) (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inr ⟨w, 0⟩) = (x.2 w).re := rfl
@[simp]
theorem stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_snd (x : E K) (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(stdBasis K).repr x (Sum.inr ⟨w, 1⟩) = (x.2 w).im := rfl
variable (K)
theorem fundamentalDomain_stdBasis :
fundamentalDomain (stdBasis K) =
(Set.univ.pi fun _ => Set.Ico 0 1) ×ˢ
(Set.univ.pi fun _ => Complex.measurableEquivPi⁻¹' (Set.univ.pi fun _ => Set.Ico 0 1)) := by
ext
simp [stdBasis, mem_fundamentalDomain, Complex.measurableEquivPi]
theorem volume_fundamentalDomain_stdBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (stdBasis K)) = 1 := by
rw [fundamentalDomain_stdBasis, volume_eq_prod, prod_prod, volume_pi, volume_pi, pi_pi, pi_pi,
Complex.volume_preserving_equiv_pi.measure_preimage ?_, volume_pi, pi_pi, Real.volume_Ico,
sub_zero, ENNReal.ofReal_one, prod_const_one, prod_const_one, prod_const_one, one_mul]
exact MeasurableSet.pi Set.countable_univ (fun _ _ => measurableSet_Ico)
/-- The `Equiv` between `index K` and `K →+* ℂ` defined by sending a real infinite place `w` to
the unique corresponding embedding `w.embedding`, and the pair `⟨w, 0⟩` (resp. `⟨w, 1⟩`) for a
complex infinite place `w` to `w.embedding` (resp. `conjugate w.embedding`). -/
def indexEquiv : (index K) ≃ (K →+* ℂ) := by
refine Equiv.ofBijective (fun c => ?_)
((Fintype.bijective_iff_surjective_and_card _).mpr ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· cases c with
| inl w => exact w.val.embedding
| inr wj => rcases wj with ⟨w, j⟩
exact if j = 0 then w.val.embedding else ComplexEmbedding.conjugate w.val.embedding
· intro φ
by_cases hφ : ComplexEmbedding.IsReal φ
· exact ⟨Sum.inl (InfinitePlace.mkReal ⟨φ, hφ⟩), by simp [embedding_mk_eq_of_isReal hφ]⟩
· by_cases hw : (InfinitePlace.mk φ).embedding = φ
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨InfinitePlace.mkComplex ⟨φ, hφ⟩, 0⟩, by simp [hw]⟩
· exact ⟨Sum.inr ⟨InfinitePlace.mkComplex ⟨φ, hφ⟩, 1⟩,
by simp [(embedding_mk_eq φ).resolve_left hw]⟩
· rw [Embeddings.card, ← mixedEmbedding.finrank K,
← FiniteDimensional.finrank_eq_card_basis (stdBasis K)]
variable {K}
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_ofIsReal (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsReal w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inl w) = w.val.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_fst (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inr ⟨w, 0⟩) = w.val.embedding := rfl
@[simp]
theorem indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_snd (w : {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w}) :
(indexEquiv K) (Sum.inr ⟨w, 1⟩) = ComplexEmbedding.conjugate w.val.embedding := rfl
variable (K)
/-- The matrix that gives the representation on `stdBasis` of the image by `commMap` of an
element `x` of `(K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` fixed by the map `x_φ ↦ conj x_(conjugate φ)`,
see `stdBasis_repr_eq_matrixToStdBasis_mul`. -/
def matrixToStdBasis : Matrix (index K) (index K) ℂ :=
fromBlocks (diagonal fun _ => 1) 0 0 <| reindex (Equiv.prodComm _ _) (Equiv.prodComm _ _)
(blockDiagonal (fun _ => (2 : ℂ)⁻¹ • !![1, 1; - I, I]))
theorem det_matrixToStdBasis :
(matrixToStdBasis K).det = (2⁻¹ * I) ^ NrComplexPlaces K :=
calc
_ = ∏ _k : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w }, det ((2 : ℂ)⁻¹ • !![1, 1; -I, I]) := by
rw [matrixToStdBasis, det_fromBlocks_zero₂₁, det_diagonal, prod_const_one, one_mul,
det_reindex_self, det_blockDiagonal]
_ = ∏ _k : { w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w }, (2⁻¹ * Complex.I) := by
refine prod_congr (Eq.refl _) (fun _ _ => ?_)
field_simp; ring
_ = (2⁻¹ * Complex.I) ^ Fintype.card {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} := by
rw [prod_const, Fintype.card]
/-- Let `x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ` such that `x_φ = conj x_(conj φ)` for all `φ : K →+* ℂ`, then the
representation of `commMap K x` on `stdBasis` is given (up to reindexing) by the product of
`matrixToStdBasis` by `x`. -/
theorem stdBasis_repr_eq_matrixToStdBasis_mul (x : (K →+* ℂ) → ℂ)
(hx : ∀ φ, conj (x φ) = x (ComplexEmbedding.conjugate φ)) (c : index K) :
((stdBasis K).repr (commMap K x) c : ℂ) =
(matrixToStdBasis K *ᵥ (x ∘ (indexEquiv K))) c := by
simp_rw [commMap, matrixToStdBasis, LinearMap.coe_mk, AddHom.coe_mk,
mulVec, dotProduct, Function.comp_apply, index, Fintype.sum_sum_type,
diagonal_one, reindex_apply, ← univ_product_univ, sum_product,
indexEquiv_apply_ofIsReal, Fin.sum_univ_two, indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_fst,
indexEquiv_apply_ofIsComplex_snd, smul_of, smul_cons, smul_eq_mul,
mul_one, Matrix.smul_empty, Equiv.prodComm_symm, Equiv.coe_prodComm]
cases c with
| inl w =>
simp_rw [stdBasis_apply_ofIsReal, fromBlocks_apply₁₁, fromBlocks_apply₁₂,
one_apply, Matrix.zero_apply, ite_mul, one_mul, zero_mul, sum_ite_eq, mem_univ, ite_true,
add_zero, sum_const_zero, add_zero, ← conj_eq_iff_re, hx (embedding w.val),
conjugate_embedding_eq_of_isReal w.prop]
| inr c =>
rcases c with ⟨w, j⟩
fin_cases j
· simp_rw [Fin.mk_zero, stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_fst, fromBlocks_apply₂₁,
fromBlocks_apply₂₂, Matrix.zero_apply, submatrix_apply,
blockDiagonal_apply, Prod.swap_prod_mk, ite_mul, zero_mul, sum_const_zero, zero_add,
sum_add_distrib, sum_ite_eq, mem_univ, ite_true, of_apply, cons_val', cons_val_zero,
cons_val_one, head_cons, ← hx (embedding w), re_eq_add_conj]
field_simp
· simp_rw [Fin.mk_one, stdBasis_apply_ofIsComplex_snd, fromBlocks_apply₂₁,
fromBlocks_apply₂₂, Matrix.zero_apply, submatrix_apply, blockDiagonal_apply,
Prod.swap_prod_mk, ite_mul, zero_mul, sum_const_zero, zero_add, sum_add_distrib, sum_ite_eq,
mem_univ, ite_true, of_apply, cons_val', cons_val_zero, cons_val_one, head_cons,
← hx (embedding w), im_eq_sub_conj]
ring_nf; field_simp
end stdBasis
noncomputable section integerLattice
variable [NumberField K]
open Module FiniteDimensional Module.Free
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
/-- A `ℝ`-basis of `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` that is also a `ℤ`-basis of the image of `𝓞 K`. -/
def latticeBasis :
Basis (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ℝ (E K) := by
classical
-- We construct an `ℝ`-linear independent family from the image of
-- `canonicalEmbedding.lattice_basis` by `commMap`
have := LinearIndependent.map (LinearIndependent.restrict_scalars
(by { simpa only [Complex.real_smul, mul_one] using Complex.ofReal_injective })
(canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K).linearIndependent)
(disjoint_span_commMap_ker K)
-- and it's a basis since it has the right cardinality
refine basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank this ?_
rw [← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, RingOfIntegers.rank, finrank_prod, finrank_pi,
finrank_pi_fintype, Complex.finrank_real_complex, sum_const, card_univ, ← NrRealPlaces,
← NrComplexPlaces, ← card_real_embeddings, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
← card_complex_embeddings, ← NumberField.Embeddings.card K ℂ, Fintype.card_subtype_compl,
Nat.add_sub_of_le (Fintype.card_subtype_le _)]
@[simp]
theorem latticeBasis_apply (i : ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
latticeBasis K i = (mixedEmbedding K) (integralBasis K i) := by
simp only [latticeBasis, coe_basisOfLinearIndependentOfCardEqFinrank, Function.comp_apply,
canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis_apply, integralBasis_apply, commMap_canonical_eq_mixed]
theorem mem_span_latticeBasis (x : (E K)) :
x ∈ Submodule.span ℤ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) ↔
x ∈ ((mixedEmbedding K).comp (algebraMap (𝓞 K) K)).range := by
rw [show Set.range (latticeBasis K) =
(mixedEmbedding K).toIntAlgHom.toLinearMap '' (Set.range (integralBasis K)) by
rw [← Set.range_comp]; exact congrArg Set.range (funext (fun i => latticeBasis_apply K i))]
rw [← Submodule.map_span, ← SetLike.mem_coe, Submodule.map_coe]
simp only [Set.mem_image, SetLike.mem_coe, mem_span_integralBasis K,
RingHom.mem_range, exists_exists_eq_and]
rfl
theorem mem_rat_span_latticeBasis (x : K) :
mixedEmbedding K x ∈ Submodule.span ℚ (Set.range (latticeBasis K)) := by
rw [← Basis.sum_repr (integralBasis K) x, map_sum]
simp_rw [map_rat_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_smul_mem _ _ (fun i _ ↦ Submodule.subset_span ?_)
rw [← latticeBasis_apply]
exact Set.mem_range_self i
theorem latticeBasis_repr_apply (x : K) (i : ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
(latticeBasis K).repr (mixedEmbedding K x) i = (integralBasis K).repr x i := by
rw [← Basis.restrictScalars_repr_apply ℚ _ ⟨_, mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x⟩, eq_ratCast,
Rat.cast_inj]
let f := (mixedEmbedding K).toRatAlgHom.toLinearMap.codRestrict _
(fun x ↦ mem_rat_span_latticeBasis K x)
suffices ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ).repr.toLinearMap ∘ₗ f =
(integralBasis K).repr.toLinearMap from DFunLike.congr_fun (LinearMap.congr_fun this x) i
refine Basis.ext (integralBasis K) (fun i ↦ ?_)
have : f (integralBasis K i) = ((latticeBasis K).restrictScalars ℚ) i := by
apply Subtype.val_injective
rw [LinearMap.codRestrict_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, Basis.restrictScalars_apply,
latticeBasis_apply]
rfl
simp_rw [LinearMap.coe_comp, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, Function.comp_apply, this, Basis.repr_self]
variable (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ)
/-- The generalized index of the lattice generated by `I` in the lattice generated by
`𝓞 K` is equal to the norm of the ideal `I`. The result is stated in terms of base change
determinant and is the translation of `NumberField.det_basisOfFractionalIdeal_eq_absNorm` in
`ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`. This is useful, in particular, to prove that the family obtained from
the `ℤ`-basis of `I` is actually an `ℝ`-basis of `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂`, see
`fractionalIdealLatticeBasis`. -/
theorem det_basisOfFractionalIdeal_eq_norm
(e : (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ≃ (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I)) :
|Basis.det (latticeBasis K) ((mixedEmbedding K ∘ (basisOfFractionalIdeal K I) ∘ e))| =
FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 := by
suffices Basis.det (latticeBasis K) ((mixedEmbedding K ∘ (basisOfFractionalIdeal K I) ∘ e)) =
(algebraMap ℚ ℝ) ((Basis.det (integralBasis K)) ((basisOfFractionalIdeal K I) ∘ e)) by
rw [this, eq_ratCast, ← Rat.cast_abs, ← Equiv.symm_symm e, ← Basis.coe_reindex,
det_basisOfFractionalIdeal_eq_absNorm K I e]
rw [Basis.det_apply, Basis.det_apply, RingHom.map_det]
congr
ext i j
simp_rw [RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, Matrix.map_apply, Basis.toMatrix_apply, Function.comp_apply]
exact latticeBasis_repr_apply K _ i
/-- A `ℝ`-basis of `ℝ^r₁ × ℂ^r₂` that is also a `ℤ`-basis of the image of the fractional
ideal `I`. -/
def fractionalIdealLatticeBasis :
Basis (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I) ℝ (E K) := by
let e : (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K)) ≃ (ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I) := by
refine Fintype.equivOfCardEq ?_
rw [← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex, ← finrank_eq_card_chooseBasisIndex,
fractionalIdeal_rank]
refine Basis.reindex ?_ e
suffices IsUnit ((latticeBasis K).det ((mixedEmbedding K) ∘ (basisOfFractionalIdeal K I) ∘ e)) by
rw [← is_basis_iff_det] at this
exact Basis.mk this.1 (by rw [this.2])
rw [isUnit_iff_ne_zero, ne_eq, ← abs_eq_zero.not, det_basisOfFractionalIdeal_eq_norm,
Rat.cast_eq_zero, FractionalIdeal.absNorm_eq_zero_iff]
exact Units.ne_zero I
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/CanonicalEmbedding/Basic.lean | 624 | 627 | theorem fractionalIdealLatticeBasis_apply (i : ChooseBasisIndex ℤ I) :
fractionalIdealLatticeBasis K I i = (mixedEmbedding K) (basisOfFractionalIdeal K I i) := by |
simp only [fractionalIdealLatticeBasis, Basis.coe_reindex, Basis.coe_mk, Function.comp_apply,
Equiv.apply_symm_apply]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4c19a16e4b705bf135cf9a80ac18fcc99c438514"
/-!
# Bicategories
In this file we define typeclass for bicategories.
A bicategory `B` consists of
* objects `a : B`,
* 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`, and
* 2-morphisms `η : f ⟶ g` between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`.
We use `u`, `v`, and `w` as the universe variables for objects, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms,
respectively.
A typeclass for bicategories extends `CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct` typeclass. This means that
we have
* a composition `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c` for each 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c`, and
* an identity `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a` for each object `a : B`.
For each object `a b : B`, the collection of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` has a category structure. The
2-morphisms in the bicategory are implemented as the morphisms in this family of categories.
The composition of 1-morphisms is in fact an object part of a functor
`(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. The definition of bicategories in this file does not
require this functor directly. Instead, it requires the whiskering functions. For a 1-morphism
`f : a ⟶ b` and a 2-morphism `η : g ⟶ h` between 1-morphisms `g h : b ⟶ c`, there is a
2-morphism `whiskerLeft f η : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h`. Similarly, for a 2-morphism `η : f ⟶ g`
between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` and a 1-morphism `f : b ⟶ c`, there is a 2-morphism
`whiskerRight η h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h`. These satisfy the exchange law
`whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ`,
which is required as an axiom in the definition here.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- In a bicategory, we can compose the 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c` to obtain
a 1-morphism `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c`. This composition does not need to be strictly associative,
but there is a specified associator, `α_ f g h : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ (g ≫ h)`.
There is an identity 1-morphism `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a`, with specified left and right unitor
isomorphisms `λ_ f : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` and `ρ_ f : f ≫ 𝟙 a ≅ f`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bicategory.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
-- category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms:
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
-- left whiskering:
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
-- right whiskering:
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
-- associator:
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
-- left unitor:
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
-- right unitor:
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
#align category_theory.bicategory CategoryTheory.Bicategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.Bicategory.homCategory
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.left_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.leftUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.right_unitor CategoryTheory.Bicategory.rightUnitor
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_left' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerLeft
#align category_theory.bicategory.id_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.id_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.comp_whisker_right' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.comp_whiskerRight
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_id' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_id
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_comp' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_comp
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_assoc' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_assoc
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_exchange' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whisker_exchange
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle' CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle
namespace Bicategory
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
/-!
### Simp-normal form for 2-morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any 2-morphisms into simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is also useful when applying (forthcoming)
`coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of 2-morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of 2-morphisms like `η₁ ≫ η₂ ≫ η₃ ≫ η₄ ≫ η₅` such that each `ηᵢ` is
either a structural 2-morphisms (2-morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural 2-morphisms, and
2. each non-structural 2-morphism in the composition is of the form `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅`,
where each `fᵢ` is a 1-morphism that is not the identity or a composite and `η` is a
non-structural 2-morphisms that is also not the identity or a composite.
Note that `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅` is actually `f₁ ◁ (f₂ ◁ (f₃ ◁ ((η ▷ f₄) ▷ f₅)))`.
-/
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
/-
The following simp attributes are put in order to rewrite any 2-morphisms into normal forms. There
are associators and unitors in the RHS in the several simp lemmas here (e.g. `id_whiskerLeft`),
which at first glance look more complicated than the LHS, but they will be eventually reduced by
the pentagon or the triangle identities, and more generally, (forthcoming) `coherence` tactic.
-/
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.hom_inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.hom_inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_hom_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_hom_whiskerRight
/-- The left whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeftIso
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_left_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerLeft_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerLeft
/-- The right whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRightIso
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
#align category_theory.bicategory.whisker_right_is_iso CategoryTheory.Bicategory.whiskerRight_isIso
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
#align category_theory.bicategory.inv_whisker_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.inv_whiskerRight
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
#align category_theory.bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
#align category_theory.bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv CategoryTheory.Bicategory.triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
#align category_theory.bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left CategoryTheory.Bicategory.associator_inv_naturality_left
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 349 | 350 | theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Bilinear
#align_import analysis.calculus.fderiv.mul from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"d608fc5d4e69d4cc21885913fb573a88b0deb521"
/-!
# Multiplicative operations on derivatives
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function
* product of finitely many scalar functions
* taking the pointwise multiplicative inverse (i.e. `Inv.inv` or `Ring.inverse`) of a function
-/
open scoped Classical
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f f₀ f₁ g : E → F}
variable {f' f₀' f₁' g' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable (e : E →L[𝕜] F)
variable {x : E}
variable {s t : Set E}
variable {L L₁ L₂ : Filter E}
section CLMCompApply
/-! ### Derivative of the pointwise composition/application of continuous linear maps -/
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H] {c : E → G →L[𝕜] H}
{c' : E →L[𝕜] G →L[𝕜] H} {d : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {d' : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G} {u : E → G} {u' : E →L[𝕜] G}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_comp (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, d x)).comp x <| hc.prod hd
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.clm_comp HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(hd : HasFDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasFDerivAt (c x, d x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <| hc.prod hd
#align has_fderiv_within_at.clm_comp HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.clm_comp (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasFDerivAt (c x, d x)).comp x <| hc.prod hd
#align has_fderiv_at.clm_comp HasFDerivAt.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.clm_comp DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.clm_comp DifferentiableAt.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hd : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 d s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).clm_comp (hd x hx)
#align differentiable_on.clm_comp DifferentiableOn.clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.clm_comp (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : Differentiable 𝕜 d) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => (c y).comp (d y) := fun x => (hc x).clm_comp (hd x)
#align differentiable.clm_comp Differentiable.clm_comp
theorem fderivWithin_clm_comp (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s x =
(compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 d s x) +
((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_clm_comp fderivWithin_clm_comp
theorem fderiv_clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) x =
(compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 d x) +
((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 c x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
#align fderiv_clm_comp fderiv_clm_comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_apply (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x)
(hu : HasStrictFDerivAt u u' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, u x)).comp x (hc.prod hu)
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.clm_apply HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(hu : HasFDerivWithinAt u u' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasFDerivAt (c x, u x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hc.prod hu)
#align has_fderiv_within_at.clm_apply HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.clm_apply (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hu : HasFDerivAt u u' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasFDerivAt (c x, u x)).comp x (hc.prod hu)
#align has_fderiv_at.clm_apply HasFDerivAt.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hu : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 u s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.clm_apply DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.clm_apply DifferentiableAt.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hu : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 u s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).clm_apply (hu x hx)
#align differentiable_on.clm_apply DifferentiableOn.clm_apply
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.clm_apply (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hu : Differentiable 𝕜 u) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => (c y) (u y) := fun x => (hc x).clm_apply (hu x)
#align differentiable.clm_apply Differentiable.clm_apply
theorem fderivWithin_clm_apply (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (hu : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 u s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s x =
(c x).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 u s x) + (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).flip (u x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_clm_apply fderivWithin_clm_apply
theorem fderiv_clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) x = (c x).comp (fderiv 𝕜 u x) + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).flip (u x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
#align fderiv_clm_apply fderiv_clm_apply
end CLMCompApply
section ContinuousMultilinearApplyConst
/-! ### Derivative of the application of continuous multilinear maps to a constant -/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (M i)]
{H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
{c : E → ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 M H}
{c' : E →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 M H}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) s x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasFDerivAt.comp x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s)
(u : ∀ i, M i) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hc x hx).continuousMultilinear_apply_const u
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y ↦ (c y) u := fun x ↦ (hc x).continuousMultilinear_apply_const u
theorem fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x = ((fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).flipMultilinear u) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
(fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) = (fderiv 𝕜 c x).flipMultilinear u :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).fderiv
/-- Application of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` to a constant commutes with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) (m : E) :
(fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x) m = (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x) m u := by
simp [fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const hxs hc]
/-- Application of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` to a constant commutes with `fderiv`. -/
theorem fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) (m : E) :
(fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) m = (fderiv 𝕜 c x) m u := by
simp [fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const hc]
end ContinuousMultilinearApplyConst
section SMul
/-! ### Derivative of the product of a scalar-valued function and a vector-valued function
If `c` is a differentiable scalar-valued function and `f` is a differentiable vector-valued
function, then `fun x ↦ c x • f x` is differentiable as well. Lemmas in this section works for
function `c` taking values in the base field, as well as in a normed algebra over the base
field: e.g., they work for `c : E → ℂ` and `f : E → F` provided that `F` is a complex
normed vector space.
-/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F]
variable {c : E → 𝕜'} {c' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_strict_fderiv_at.smul HasStrictFDerivAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) s x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_fderiv_within_at.smul HasFDerivWithinAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp x <| hc.prod hf
#align has_fderiv_at.smul HasFDerivAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
#align differentiable_within_at.smul DifferentiableWithinAt.smul
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
#align differentiable_at.smul DifferentiableAt.smul
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.smul (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).smul (hf x hx)
#align differentiable_on.smul DifferentiableOn.smul
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.smul (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c y • f y := fun x => (hc x).smul (hf x)
#align differentiable.smul Differentiable.smul
theorem fderivWithin_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
#align fderiv_within_smul fderivWithin_smul
theorem fderiv_smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x = c x • fderiv 𝕜 f x + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
#align fderiv_smul fderiv_smul
@[fun_prop]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Mul.lean | 307 | 309 | theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) x := by |
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasStrictFDerivAt_const f x)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nathaniel Thomas, Jeremy Avigad, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Anne Baanen,
Frédéric Dupuis, Heather Macbeth, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Pointwise.SMul
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Pointwise actions of equivariant maps
- `image_smul_setₛₗ` : under a `σ`-equivariant map,
one has `h '' (c • s) = (σ c) • h '' s`.
- `preimage_smul_setₛₗ'` is a general version of the equality
`h ⁻¹' (σ c • s) = c • h⁻¹' s`.
It requires that `c` acts surjectively and `σ c` acts injectively and
is provided with specific versions:
- `preimage_smul_setₛₗ_of_units` when `c` and `σ c` are units
- `preimage_smul_setₛₗ` when `σ` belongs to a `MonoidHomClass`and `c` is a unit
- `MonoidHom.preimage_smul_setₛₗ` when `σ` is a `MonoidHom` and `c` is a unit
- `Group.preimage_smul_setₛₗ` : when the types of `c` and `σ c` are groups.
- `image_smul_set`, `preimage_smul_set` and `Group.preimage_smul_set` are
the variants when `σ` is the identity.
-/
open Set Pointwise
theorem MulAction.smul_bijective_of_is_unit
{M : Type*} [Monoid M] {α : Type*} [MulAction M α] {m : M} (hm : IsUnit m) :
Function.Bijective (fun (a : α) ↦ m • a) := by
lift m to Mˣ using hm
rw [Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse]
use fun a ↦ m⁻¹ • a
constructor
· intro x; simp [← Units.smul_def]
· intro x; simp [← Units.smul_def]
variable {R S : Type*} (M M₁ M₂ N : Type*)
variable [Monoid R] [Monoid S] (σ : R → S)
variable [MulAction R M] [MulAction S N] [MulAction R M₁] [MulAction R M₂]
variable {F : Type*} (h : F)
section MulActionSemiHomClass
variable [FunLike F M N] [MulActionSemiHomClass F σ M N]
(c : R) (s : Set M) (t : Set N)
-- @[simp] -- In #8386, the `simp_nf` linter complains:
-- "Left-hand side does not simplify, when using the simp lemma on itself."
-- For now we will have to manually add `image_smul_setₛₗ _` to the `simp` argument list.
-- TODO: when lean4#3107 is fixed, mark this as `@[simp]`.
theorem image_smul_setₛₗ :
h '' (c • s) = σ c • h '' s := by
simp only [← image_smul, image_image, map_smulₛₗ h]
#align image_smul_setₛₗ image_smul_setₛₗ
/-- Translation of preimage is contained in preimage of translation -/
theorem smul_preimage_set_leₛₗ :
c • h ⁻¹' t ⊆ h ⁻¹' (σ c • t) := by
rintro x ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact ⟨h y, hy, by rw [map_smulₛₗ]⟩
variable {c}
/-- General version of `preimage_smul_setₛₗ` -/
theorem preimage_smul_setₛₗ'
(hc : Function.Surjective (fun (m : M) ↦ c • m))
(hc' : Function.Injective (fun (n : N) ↦ σ c • n)) :
h ⁻¹' (σ c • t) = c • h ⁻¹' t := by
apply le_antisymm
· intro m
obtain ⟨m', rfl⟩ := hc m
rintro ⟨n, hn, hn'⟩
refine ⟨m', ?_, rfl⟩
rw [map_smulₛₗ] at hn'
rw [mem_preimage, ← hc' hn']
exact hn
· exact smul_preimage_set_leₛₗ M N σ h c t
/-- `preimage_smul_setₛₗ` when both scalars act by unit -/
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Pointwise.lean | 87 | 91 | theorem preimage_smul_setₛₗ_of_units (hc : IsUnit c) (hc' : IsUnit (σ c)) :
h ⁻¹' (σ c • t) = c • h ⁻¹' t := by |
apply preimage_smul_setₛₗ'
· exact (MulAction.smul_bijective_of_is_unit hc).surjective
· exact (MulAction.smul_bijective_of_is_unit hc').injective
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Sieves
#align_import category_theory.sites.sheaf_of_types from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# The sheaf condition for a presieve
We define what it means for a presheaf `P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v` to be a sheaf *for* a particular
presieve `R` on `X`:
* A *family of elements* `x` for `P` at `R` is an element `x_f` of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`. See `FamilyOfElements`.
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and `f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` both in `R`,
and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂` such that `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`, the restriction of
`x_f₁` along `g₁` agrees with the restriction of `x_f₂` along `g₂`.
See `FamilyOfElements.Compatible`.
* An *amalgamation* `t` for the family is an element of `P X` such that for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in
`R`, the restriction of `t` on `f` is `x_f`.
See `FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation`.
We then say `P` is *separated* for `R` if every compatible family has at most one amalgamation,
and it is a *sheaf* for `R` if every compatible family has a unique amalgamation.
See `IsSeparatedFor` and `IsSheafFor`.
In the special case where `R` is a sieve, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R` and `g : Z ⟶ Y`, the restriction of
`x_f` along `g` agrees with `x_(g ≫ f)` (which is well defined since `g ≫ f` is in `R`).
See `FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible` and `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
In the special case where `C` has pullbacks, the compatibility condition can be simplified:
* The family `x` is *compatible* if, for any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` both in `R`,
the restriction of `x_f` along `π₁ : pullback f g ⟶ Y` agrees with the restriction of `x_g`
along `π₂ : pullback f g ⟶ Z`.
See `FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible` and `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
We also provide equivalent conditions to satisfy alternate definitions given in the literature.
* Stacks: The condition of https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8 is virtually identical to the
statement of `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition` (since the bijection described there carries
the same information as the unique existence.)
* Maclane-Moerdijk [MM92]: Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`, the definitions of `IsSheaf`
are equivalent. There are also alternate definitions given:
- Yoneda condition: Defined in `yonedaSheafCondition` and equivalence in
`isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
- Matching family for presieves with pullback: `pullbackCompatible_iff`.
## Implementation
The sheaf condition is given as a proposition, rather than a subsingleton in `Type (max u₁ v)`.
This doesn't seem to make a big difference, other than making a couple of definitions noncomputable,
but it means that equivalent conditions can be given as `↔` statements rather than `≃` statements,
which can be convenient.
## References
* [MM92]: *Sheaves in geometry and logic*, Saunders MacLane, and Ieke Moerdijk:
Chapter III, Section 4.
* [Elephant]: *Sketches of an Elephant*, P. T. Johnstone: C2.1.
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VL (sheaves on a pretopology or site)
* https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00ZB (sheaves on a topology)
-/
universe w v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite CategoryTheory Category Limits Sieve
namespace Presieve
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
variable {P Q U : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w}
variable {X Y : C} {S : Sieve X} {R : Presieve X}
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf `P` given a collection of arrows `R` with fixed codomain `X`
consists of an element of `P Y` for every `f : Y ⟶ X` in `R`.
A presheaf is a sheaf (resp, separated) if every *compatible* family of elements has exactly one
(resp, at most one) amalgamation.
This data is referred to as a `family` in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. It is also a concrete
version of the elements of the middle object in https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM which is
more useful for direct calculations. It is also used implicitly in Definition C2.1.2 in [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f → P.obj (op Y)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements
instance : Inhabited (FamilyOfElements P (⊥ : Presieve X)) :=
⟨fun _ _ => False.elim⟩
/-- A family of elements for a presheaf on the presieve `R₂` can be restricted to a smaller presieve
`R₁`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) :
FamilyOfElements P R₂ → FamilyOfElements P R₁ := fun x _ f hf => x f (h _ hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.restrict
/-- The image of a family of elements by a morphism of presheaves. -/
def FamilyOfElements.map (p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) :
FamilyOfElements Q R :=
fun _ f hf => φ.app _ (p f hf)
@[simp]
lemma FamilyOfElements.map_apply
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : R f) :
p.map φ f hf = φ.app _ (p f hf) := rfl
lemma FamilyOfElements.restrict_map
(p : FamilyOfElements P R) (φ : P ⟶ Q) {R' : Presieve X} (h : R' ≤ R) :
(p.restrict h).map φ = (p.map φ).restrict h := rfl
/-- A family of elements for the arrow set `R` is *compatible* if for any `f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X` and
`f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X` in `R`, and any `g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁` and `g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂`, if the square `g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂`
commutes then the elements of `P Z` obtained by restricting the element of `P Y₁` along `g₁` and
restricting the element of `P Y₂` along `g₂` are the same.
In special cases, this condition can be simplified, see `pullbackCompatible_iff` and
`compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is referred to as a "compatible family" in Definition C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and on nlab:
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.Compatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.Compatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂ Z⦄ (g₁ : Z ⟶ Y₁) (g₂ : Z ⟶ Y₂) ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
g₁ ≫ f₁ = g₂ ≫ f₂ → P.map g₁.op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map g₂.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible
/--
If the category `C` has pullbacks, this is an alternative condition for a family of elements to be
compatible: For any `f : Y ⟶ X` and `g : Z ⟶ X` in the presieve `R`, the restriction of the
given elements for `f` and `g` to the pullback agree.
This is equivalent to being compatible (provided `C` has pullbacks), shown in
`pullbackCompatible_iff`.
This is the definition for a "matching" family given in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
Equation (5). Viewing the type `FamilyOfElements` as the middle object of the fork in
https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00VM, this condition expresses that `pr₀* (x) = pr₁* (x)`,
using the notation defined there.
For a more explicit version in the case where `R` is of the form `Presieve.ofArrows`, see
`CategoryTheory.Presieve.Arrows.PullbackCompatible`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y₁ Y₂⦄ ⦃f₁ : Y₁ ⟶ X⦄ ⦃f₂ : Y₂ ⟶ X⦄ (h₁ : R f₁) (h₂ : R f₂),
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks h₁ h₂
P.map (pullback.fst : Limits.pullback f₁ f₂ ⟶ _).op (x f₁ h₁) = P.map pullback.snd.op (x f₂ h₂)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.PullbackCompatible
theorem pullbackCompatible_iff (x : FamilyOfElements P R) [R.hasPullbacks] :
x.Compatible ↔ x.PullbackCompatible := by
constructor
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂
apply t
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
apply pullback.condition
· intro t Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ hf₁ hf₂ comm
haveI := hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks hf₁ hf₂
rw [← pullback.lift_fst _ _ comm, op_comp, FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, t hf₁ hf₂,
← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, pullback.lift_snd]
#align category_theory.presieve.pullback_compatible_iff CategoryTheory.Presieve.pullbackCompatible_iff
/-- The restriction of a compatible family is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂)
{x : FamilyOfElements P R₂} : x.Compatible → (x.restrict h).Compatible :=
fun q _ _ _ g₁ g₂ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm => q g₁ g₂ (h _ h₁) (h _ h₂) comm
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.restrict
/-- Extend a family of elements to the sieve generated by an arrow set.
This is the construction described as "easy" in Lemma C2.1.3 of [Elephant].
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) := fun _ _ hf =>
P.map hf.choose_spec.choose.op (x _ hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.1)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
/-- The extension of a compatible family to the generated sieve is compatible. -/
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (hx : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.Compatible := by
intro _ _ _ _ _ _ _ h₁ h₂ comm
iterate 2 erw [← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply]; rw [← op_comp]
apply hx
simp [comm, h₁.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2, h₂.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.sieveExtend
/-- The extension of a family agrees with the original family. -/
theorem extend_agrees {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : R f) :
x.sieveExtend f (le_generate R Y hf) = x f hf := by
have h := (le_generate R Y hf).choose_spec
unfold FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend
rw [t h.choose (𝟙 _) _ hf _]
· simp
· rw [id_comp]
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_agrees CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_agrees
/-- The restriction of an extension is the original. -/
@[simp]
theorem restrict_extend {x : FamilyOfElements P R} (t : x.Compatible) :
x.sieveExtend.restrict (le_generate R) = x := by
funext Y f hf
exact extend_agrees t hf
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_extend
/--
If the arrow set for a family of elements is actually a sieve (i.e. it is downward closed) then the
consistency condition can be simplified.
This is an equivalent condition, see `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`.
This is the notion of "matching" given for families on sieves given in [MM92], Chapter III,
Section 4, Equation 1, and nlab: https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family.
See also the discussion before Lemma C2.1.4 of [Elephant].
-/
def FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y Z⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (hf), x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.SieveCompatible
theorem compatible_iff_sieveCompatible (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
x.Compatible ↔ x.SieveCompatible := by
constructor
· intro h Y Z f g hf
simpa using h (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
· intro h Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ k
simp_rw [← h f₁ g₁ h₁, ← h f₂ g₂ h₂]
congr
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_iff_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatible_iff_sieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible {x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)}
(t : x.Compatible) : x.SieveCompatible :=
(compatible_iff_sieveCompatible x).1 t
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.to_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.to_sieveCompatible
/--
Given a family of elements `x` for the sieve `S` generated by a presieve `R`, if `x` is restricted
to `R` and then extended back up to `S`, the resulting extension equals `x`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem extend_restrict {x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t : x.Compatible) :
(x.restrict (le_generate R)).sieveExtend = x := by
rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at t
funext _ _ h
apply (t _ _ _).symm.trans
congr
exact h.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2
#align category_theory.presieve.extend_restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.extend_restrict
/--
Two compatible families on the sieve generated by a presieve `R` are equal if and only if they are
equal when restricted to `R`.
-/
theorem restrict_inj {x₁ x₂ : FamilyOfElements P (generate R)} (t₁ : x₁.Compatible)
(t₂ : x₂.Compatible) : x₁.restrict (le_generate R) = x₂.restrict (le_generate R) → x₁ = x₂ :=
fun h => by
rw [← extend_restrict t₁, ← extend_restrict t₂]
-- Porting note: congr fails to make progress
apply congr_arg
exact h
#align category_theory.presieve.restrict_inj CategoryTheory.Presieve.restrict_inj
/-- Compatible families of elements for a presheaf of types `P` and a presieve `R`
are in 1-1 correspondence with compatible families for the same presheaf and
the sieve generated by `R`, through extension and restriction. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible :
{ x : FamilyOfElements P R // x.Compatible } ≃
{ x : FamilyOfElements P (generate R : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun x := ⟨x.1.sieveExtend, x.2.sieveExtend⟩
invFun x := ⟨x.1.restrict (le_generate R), x.2.restrict _⟩
left_inv x := Subtype.ext (restrict_extend x.2)
right_inv x := Subtype.ext (extend_restrict x.2)
#align category_theory.presieve.compatible_equiv_generate_sieve_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.compatibleEquivGenerateSieveCompatible
theorem FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible (S : Sieve X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(t : x.Compatible) {f : Y ⟶ X} (hf : S f) {Z} (g : Z ⟶ Y) :
x (g ≫ f) (S.downward_closed hf g) = P.map g.op (x f hf) := by
simpa using t (𝟙 _) g (S.downward_closed hf g) hf (id_comp _)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_of_compatible CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.comp_of_compatible
section FunctorPullback
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C) {Z : D}
variable {T : Presieve (F.obj Z)} {x : FamilyOfElements P T}
/--
Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `F(X)`, we can realize it as a family of elements of
`S.functorPullback F`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.functorPullback (x : FamilyOfElements P T) :
FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) (T.functorPullback F) := fun _ f hf => x (F.map f) hf
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.functor_pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.functorPullback
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback (h : x.Compatible) :
(x.functorPullback F).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
exact h (F.map g₁) (F.map g₂) h₁ h₂ (by simp only [← F.map_comp, eq])
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.functor_pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.functorPullback
end FunctorPullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X` whose values factors through `F`, we can
realize it as a family of elements of `S.functorPushforward F`. Since the preimage is obtained by
choice, this is not well-defined generally.
-/
noncomputable def FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : D ⥤ C)
{X : D} {T : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements (F.op ⋙ P) T) :
FamilyOfElements P (T.functorPushforward F) := fun Y f h => by
obtain ⟨Z, g, h, h₁, _⟩ := getFunctorPushforwardStructure h
exact P.map h.op (x g h₁)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.functor_pushforward CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.functorPushforward
section Pullback
/-- Given a family of elements of a sieve `S` on `X`, and a map `Y ⟶ X`, we can obtain a
family of elements of `S.pullback f` by taking the same elements.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X)) :
FamilyOfElements P (S.pullback f : Presieve Y) := fun _ g hg => x (g ≫ f) hg
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.pullback
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback (f : Y ⟶ X) {x : FamilyOfElements P S}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.pullback f).Compatible := by
simp only [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible] at h ⊢
intro W Z f₁ f₂ hf
unfold FamilyOfElements.pullback
rw [← h (f₁ ≫ f) f₂ hf]
congr 1
simp only [assoc]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.pullback CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.pullback
end Pullback
/-- Given a morphism of presheaves `f : P ⟶ Q`, we can take a family of elements valued in `P` to a
family of elements valued in `Q` by composing with `f`.
-/
def FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
FamilyOfElements Q R := fun Y g hg => f.app (op Y) (x g hg)
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id (x : FamilyOfElements P R) :
x.compPresheafMap (𝟙 P) = x :=
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_presheaf_map_id CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_id
@[simp]
theorem FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (f : P ⟶ Q)
(g : Q ⟶ U) : (x.compPresheafMap f).compPresheafMap g = x.compPresheafMap (f ≫ g) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.comp_prersheaf_map_comp CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap_comp
theorem FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap (f : P ⟶ Q) {x : FamilyOfElements P R}
(h : x.Compatible) : (x.compPresheafMap f).Compatible := by
intro Z₁ Z₂ W g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ eq
unfold FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap
rwa [← FunctorToTypes.naturality, ← FunctorToTypes.naturality, h]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.compatible.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.Compatible.compPresheafMap
/--
The given element `t` of `P.obj (op X)` is an *amalgamation* for the family of elements `x` if every
restriction `P.map f.op t = x_f` for every arrow `f` in the presieve `R`.
This is the definition given in https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents,
and https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/matching+family, as well as [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4,
equation (2).
-/
def FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X)) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : R f), P.map f.op t = x f h
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.is_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation
theorem FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap {x : FamilyOfElements P R} {t} (f : P ⟶ Q)
(h : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.compPresheafMap f).IsAmalgamation (f.app (op X) t) := by
intro Y g hg
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.compPresheafMap]
change (f.app _ ≫ Q.map _) _ = _
rw [← f.naturality, types_comp_apply, h g hg]
#align category_theory.presieve.family_of_elements.is_amalgamation.comp_presheaf_map CategoryTheory.Presieve.FamilyOfElements.IsAmalgamation.compPresheafMap
theorem is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation (x : FamilyOfElements P R)
(h : ∃ t, x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.Compatible := by
cases' h with t ht
intro Y₁ Y₂ Z g₁ g₂ f₁ f₂ h₁ h₂ comm
rw [← ht _ h₁, ← ht _ h₂, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, comm]
simp
#align category_theory.presieve.is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation CategoryTheory.Presieve.is_compatible_of_exists_amalgamation
theorem isAmalgamation_restrict {R₁ R₂ : Presieve X} (h : R₁ ≤ R₂) (x : FamilyOfElements P R₂)
(t : P.obj (op X)) (ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : (x.restrict h).IsAmalgamation t := fun Y f hf =>
ht f (h Y hf)
#align category_theory.presieve.is_amalgamation_restrict CategoryTheory.Presieve.isAmalgamation_restrict
theorem isAmalgamation_sieveExtend {R : Presieve X} (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t : P.obj (op X))
(ht : x.IsAmalgamation t) : x.sieveExtend.IsAmalgamation t := by
intro Y f hf
dsimp [FamilyOfElements.sieveExtend]
rw [← ht _, ← FunctorToTypes.map_comp_apply, ← op_comp, hf.choose_spec.choose_spec.choose_spec.2]
#align category_theory.presieve.is_amalgamation_sieve_extend CategoryTheory.Presieve.isAmalgamation_sieveExtend
/-- A presheaf is separated for a presieve if there is at most one amalgamation. -/
def IsSeparatedFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ (x : FamilyOfElements P R) (t₁ t₂), x.IsAmalgamation t₁ → x.IsAmalgamation t₂ → t₁ = t₂
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSeparatedFor
theorem IsSeparatedFor.ext {R : Presieve X} (hR : IsSeparatedFor P R) {t₁ t₂ : P.obj (op X)}
(h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄ (_ : R f), P.map f.op t₁ = P.map f.op t₂) : t₁ = t₂ :=
hR (fun _ f _ => P.map f.op t₂) t₁ t₂ (fun _ _ hf => h hf) fun _ _ _ => rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for.ext CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSeparatedFor.ext
theorem isSeparatedFor_iff_generate :
IsSeparatedFor P R ↔ IsSeparatedFor P (generate R : Presieve X) := by
constructor
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h (x.restrict (le_generate R)) t₁ t₂ _ _
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_restrict _ x t₂ ht₂
· intro h x t₁ t₂ ht₁ ht₂
apply h x.sieveExtend
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₁ ht₁
· exact isAmalgamation_sieveExtend x t₂ ht₂
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for_iff_generate CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSeparatedFor_iff_generate
theorem isSeparatedFor_top (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) : IsSeparatedFor P (⊤ : Presieve X) :=
fun x t₁ t₂ h₁ h₂ => by
have q₁ := h₁ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
have q₂ := h₂ (𝟙 X) (by tauto)
simp only [op_id, FunctorToTypes.map_id_apply] at q₁ q₂
rw [q₁, q₂]
#align category_theory.presieve.is_separated_for_top CategoryTheory.Presieve.isSeparatedFor_top
/-- We define `P` to be a sheaf for the presieve `R` if every compatible family has a unique
amalgamation.
This is the definition of a sheaf for the given presieve given in C2.1.2 of [Elephant], and
https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/sheaf#GeneralDefinitionInComponents.
Using `compatible_iff_sieveCompatible`,
this is equivalent to the definition of a sheaf in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def IsSheafFor (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) (R : Presieve X) : Prop :=
∀ x : FamilyOfElements P R, x.Compatible → ∃! t, x.IsAmalgamation t
#align category_theory.presieve.is_sheaf_for CategoryTheory.Presieve.IsSheafFor
/-- This is an equivalent condition to be a sheaf, which is useful for the abstraction to local
operators on elementary toposes. However this definition is defined only for sieves, not presieves.
The equivalence between this and `IsSheafFor` is given in `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`.
This version is also useful to establish that being a sheaf is preserved under isomorphism of
presheaves.
See the discussion before Equation (3) of [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4. See also C2.1.4 of
[Elephant]. This is also a direct reformulation of <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00Z8>.
-/
def YonedaSheafCondition (P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁) (S : Sieve X) : Prop :=
∀ f : S.functor ⟶ P, ∃! g, S.functorInclusion ≫ g = f
#align category_theory.presieve.yoneda_sheaf_condition CategoryTheory.Presieve.YonedaSheafCondition
-- TODO: We can generalize the universe parameter v₁ above by composing with
-- appropriate `ulift_functor`s.
/-- (Implementation). This is a (primarily internal) equivalence between natural transformations
and compatible families.
Cf the discussion after Lemma 7.47.10 in <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/00YW>. See also
the proof of C2.1.4 of [Elephant], and the discussion in [MM92], Chapter III, Section 4.
-/
def natTransEquivCompatibleFamily {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} :
(S.functor ⟶ P) ≃ { x : FamilyOfElements P (S : Presieve X) // x.Compatible } where
toFun α := by
refine ⟨fun Y f hf => ?_, ?_⟩
· apply α.app (op Y) ⟨_, hf⟩
· rw [compatible_iff_sieveCompatible]
intro Y Z f g hf
dsimp
rw [← FunctorToTypes.naturality _ _ α g.op]
rfl
invFun t :=
{ app := fun Y f => t.1 _ f.2
naturality := fun Y Z g => by
ext ⟨f, hf⟩
apply t.2.to_sieveCompatible _ }
left_inv α := by
ext X ⟨_, _⟩
rfl
right_inv := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rfl
#align category_theory.presieve.nat_trans_equiv_compatible_family CategoryTheory.Presieve.natTransEquivCompatibleFamily
/-- (Implementation). A lemma useful to prove `isSheafFor_iff_yonedaSheafCondition`. -/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/IsSheafFor.lean | 494 | 509 | theorem extension_iff_amalgamation {P : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type v₁} (x : S.functor ⟶ P) (g : yoneda.obj X ⟶ P) :
S.functorInclusion ≫ g = x ↔
(natTransEquivCompatibleFamily x).1.IsAmalgamation (yonedaEquiv g) := by |
change _ ↔ ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (h : S f), P.map f.op (yonedaEquiv g) = x.app (op Y) ⟨f, h⟩
constructor
· rintro rfl Y f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp
simp [yonedaEquiv_apply]
-- See note [dsimp, simp].
· intro h
ext Y ⟨f, hf⟩
convert h f hf
rw [yonedaEquiv_naturality]
dsimp [yonedaEquiv]
simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Stuart Presnell. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Stuart Presnell
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Multiset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.PrimeFin
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
#align_import data.nat.factorization.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f694c7dead66f5d4c80f446c796a5aad14707f0e"
/-!
# Prime factorizations
`n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. For example, since 2000 = 2^4 * 5^3,
* `factorization 2000 2` is 4
* `factorization 2000 5` is 3
* `factorization 2000 k` is 0 for all other `k : ℕ`.
## TODO
* As discussed in this Zulip thread:
https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/217875/topic/Multiplicity.20in.20the.20naturals
We have lots of disparate ways of talking about the multiplicity of a prime
in a natural number, including `factors.count`, `padicValNat`, `multiplicity`,
and the material in `Data/PNat/Factors`. Move some of this material to this file,
prove results about the relationships between these definitions,
and (where appropriate) choose a uniform canonical way of expressing these ideas.
* Moreover, the results here should be generalised to an arbitrary unique factorization monoid
with a normalization function, and then deduplicated. The basics of this have been started in
`RingTheory/UniqueFactorizationDomain`.
* Extend the inductions to any `NormalizationMonoid` with unique factorization.
-/
-- Workaround for lean4#2038
attribute [-instance] instBEqNat
open Nat Finset List Finsupp
namespace Nat
variable {a b m n p : ℕ}
/-- `n.factorization` is the finitely supported function `ℕ →₀ ℕ`
mapping each prime factor of `n` to its multiplicity in `n`. -/
def factorization (n : ℕ) : ℕ →₀ ℕ where
support := n.primeFactors
toFun p := if p.Prime then padicValNat p n else 0
mem_support_toFun := by simp [not_or]; aesop
#align nat.factorization Nat.factorization
/-- The support of `n.factorization` is exactly `n.primeFactors`. -/
@[simp] lemma support_factorization (n : ℕ) : (factorization n).support = n.primeFactors := rfl
theorem factorization_def (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) : n.factorization p = padicValNat p n := by
simpa [factorization] using absurd pp
#align nat.factorization_def Nat.factorization_def
/-- We can write both `n.factorization p` and `n.factors.count p` to represent the power
of `p` in the factorization of `n`: we declare the former to be the simp-normal form. -/
@[simp]
theorem factors_count_eq {n p : ℕ} : n.factors.count p = n.factorization p := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hn0)
· simp [factorization, count]
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
rw [count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (mt prime_of_mem_factors pp)]
simp [factorization, pp]
simp only [factorization_def _ pp]
apply _root_.le_antisymm
· rw [le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
exact List.le_count_iff_replicate_sublist.mp le_rfl |>.subperm
· rw [← lt_add_one_iff, lt_iff_not_ge, ge_iff_le,
le_padicValNat_iff_replicate_subperm_factors pp hn0.ne']
intro h
have := h.count_le p
simp at this
#align nat.factors_count_eq Nat.factors_count_eq
theorem factorization_eq_factors_multiset (n : ℕ) :
n.factorization = Multiset.toFinsupp (n.factors : Multiset ℕ) := by
ext p
simp
#align nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset Nat.factorization_eq_factors_multiset
theorem multiplicity_eq_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
multiplicity p n = n.factorization p := by
simp [factorization, pp, padicValNat_def' pp.ne_one hn.bot_lt]
#align nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization Nat.multiplicity_eq_factorization
/-! ### Basic facts about factorization -/
@[simp]
theorem factorization_prod_pow_eq_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization.prod (· ^ ·) = n := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp only [← prod_toMultiset, factorization, Multiset.prod_coe, Multiset.toFinsupp_toMultiset]
exact prod_factors hn
#align nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self
theorem eq_of_factorization_eq {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(h : ∀ p : ℕ, a.factorization p = b.factorization p) : a = b :=
eq_of_perm_factors ha hb (by simpa only [List.perm_iff_count, factors_count_eq] using h)
#align nat.eq_of_factorization_eq Nat.eq_of_factorization_eq
/-- Every nonzero natural number has a unique prime factorization -/
theorem factorization_inj : Set.InjOn factorization { x : ℕ | x ≠ 0 } := fun a ha b hb h =>
eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => by simp [h]
#align nat.factorization_inj Nat.factorization_inj
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero : factorization 0 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_zero Nat.factorization_zero
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one : factorization 1 = 0 := by ext; simp [factorization]
#align nat.factorization_one Nat.factorization_one
#noalign nat.support_factorization
#align nat.factor_iff_mem_factorization Nat.mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors
#align nat.prime_of_mem_factorization Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.pos_of_mem_factorization Nat.pos_of_mem_primeFactors
#align nat.le_of_mem_factorization Nat.le_of_mem_primeFactors
/-! ## Lemmas characterising when `n.factorization p = 0` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff (n p : ℕ) :
n.factorization p = 0 ↔ ¬p.Prime ∨ ¬p ∣ n ∨ n = 0 := by
simp_rw [← not_mem_support_iff, support_factorization, mem_primeFactors, not_and_or, not_ne_iff]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (hp : ¬p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = 0 := by simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (h : ¬p ∣ n) : n.factorization p = 0 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, h]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_lt {n p : ℕ} (h : n < p) : n.factorization p = 0 :=
Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp (mt le_of_mem_primeFactors (not_le_of_lt h))
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem factorization_zero_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 0 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_zero
#align nat.factorization_zero_right Nat.factorization_zero_right
@[simp]
theorem factorization_one_right (n : ℕ) : n.factorization 1 = 0 :=
factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ not_prime_one
#align nat.factorization_one_right Nat.factorization_one_right
theorem dvd_of_factorization_pos {n p : ℕ} (hn : n.factorization p ≠ 0) : p ∣ n :=
dvd_of_mem_factors <| mem_primeFactors_iff_mem_factors.1 <| mem_support_iff.2 hn
#align nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos Nat.dvd_of_factorization_pos
theorem Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (h : p ∣ n) :
0 < n.factorization p := by
rwa [← factors_count_eq, count_pos_iff_mem, mem_factors_iff_dvd hn hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd Nat.Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (hr : ¬p ∣ r) :
(p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
apply factorization_eq_zero_of_not_dvd
rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (Dvd.intro i rfl)]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder {p r : ℕ} (i : ℕ) (pp : p.Prime) (hr0 : r ≠ 0) :
¬p ∣ r ↔ (p * i + r).factorization p = 0 := by
refine ⟨factorization_eq_zero_of_remainder i, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [factorization_eq_zero_iff] at h
contrapose! h
refine ⟨pp, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [← Nat.dvd_add_iff_right (dvd_mul_right p i)]
· contrapose! hr0
exact (add_eq_zero_iff.mp hr0).2
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff_remainder
/-- The only numbers with empty prime factorization are `0` and `1` -/
theorem factorization_eq_zero_iff' (n : ℕ) : n.factorization = 0 ↔ n = 0 ∨ n = 1 := by
rw [factorization_eq_factors_multiset n]
simp [factorization, AddEquiv.map_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.coe_eq_zero]
#align nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff' Nat.factorization_eq_zero_iff'
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of products and powers -/
/-- For nonzero `a` and `b`, the power of `p` in `a * b` is the sum of the powers in `a` and `b` -/
@[simp]
theorem factorization_mul {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a * b).factorization = a.factorization + b.factorization := by
ext p
simp only [add_apply, ← factors_count_eq, perm_iff_count.mp (perm_factors_mul ha hb) p,
count_append]
#align nat.factorization_mul Nat.factorization_mul
#align nat.factorization_mul_support Nat.primeFactors_mul
/-- A product over `n.factorization` can be written as a product over `n.primeFactors`; -/
lemma prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → ℕ → β) :
n.factorization.prod f = ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p (n.factorization p) := rfl
#align nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_factors Nat.prod_factorization_eq_prod_primeFactors
/-- A product over `n.primeFactors` can be written as a product over `n.factorization`; -/
lemma prod_primeFactors_prod_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β) :
∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, f p = n.factorization.prod (fun p _ ↦ f p) := rfl
/-- For any `p : ℕ` and any function `g : α → ℕ` that's non-zero on `S : Finset α`,
the power of `p` in `S.prod g` equals the sum over `x ∈ S` of the powers of `p` in `g x`.
Generalises `factorization_mul`, which is the special case where `S.card = 2` and `g = id`. -/
theorem factorization_prod {α : Type*} {S : Finset α} {g : α → ℕ} (hS : ∀ x ∈ S, g x ≠ 0) :
(S.prod g).factorization = S.sum fun x => (g x).factorization := by
classical
ext p
refine Finset.induction_on' S ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro x T hxS hTS hxT IH
have hT : T.prod g ≠ 0 := prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr fun x hx => hS x (hTS hx)
simp [prod_insert hxT, sum_insert hxT, ← IH, factorization_mul (hS x hxS) hT]
#align nat.factorization_prod Nat.factorization_prod
/-- For any `p`, the power of `p` in `n^k` is `k` times the power in `n` -/
@[simp]
theorem factorization_pow (n k : ℕ) : factorization (n ^ k) = k • n.factorization := by
induction' k with k ih; · simp
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rw [Nat.pow_succ, mul_comm, factorization_mul hn (pow_ne_zero _ hn), ih,
add_smul, one_smul, add_comm]
#align nat.factorization_pow Nat.factorization_pow
/-! ## Lemmas about factorizations of primes and prime powers -/
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself, with multiplicity `1` -/
@[simp]
protected theorem Prime.factorization {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization = single p 1 := by
ext q
rw [← factors_count_eq, factors_prime hp, single_apply, count_singleton', if_congr eq_comm] <;>
rfl
#align nat.prime.factorization Nat.Prime.factorization
/-- The multiplicity of prime `p` in `p` is `1` -/
@[simp]
theorem Prime.factorization_self {p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : p.factorization p = 1 := by simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_self Nat.Prime.factorization_self
/-- For prime `p` the only prime factor of `p^k` is `p` with multiplicity `k` -/
theorem Prime.factorization_pow {p k : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) : (p ^ k).factorization = single p k := by
simp [hp]
#align nat.prime.factorization_pow Nat.Prime.factorization_pow
/-- If the factorization of `n` contains just one number `p` then `n` is a power of `p` -/
theorem eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single {n p k : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0)
(h : n.factorization = Finsupp.single p k) : n = p ^ k := by
-- Porting note: explicitly added `Finsupp.prod_single_index`
rw [← Nat.factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, h, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
simp
#align nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single Nat.eq_pow_of_factorization_eq_single
/-- The only prime factor of prime `p` is `p` itself. -/
theorem Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos {p q : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (h : p.factorization q ≠ 0) :
p = q := by simpa [hp.factorization, single_apply] using h
#align nat.prime.eq_of_factorization_pos Nat.Prime.eq_of_factorization_pos
/-! ### Equivalence between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
/-- Any Finsupp `f : ℕ →₀ ℕ` whose support is in the primes is equal to the factorization of
the product `∏ (a : ℕ) ∈ f.support, a ^ f a`. -/
theorem prod_pow_factorization_eq_self {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ f.support → Prime p) :
(f.prod (· ^ ·)).factorization = f := by
have h : ∀ x : ℕ, x ∈ f.support → x ^ f x ≠ 0 := fun p hp =>
pow_ne_zero _ (Prime.ne_zero (hf p hp))
simp only [Finsupp.prod, factorization_prod h]
conv =>
rhs
rw [(sum_single f).symm]
exact sum_congr rfl fun p hp => Prime.factorization_pow (hf p hp)
#align nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self Nat.prod_pow_factorization_eq_self
theorem eq_factorization_iff {n : ℕ} {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
f = n.factorization ↔ f.prod (· ^ ·) = n :=
⟨fun h => by rw [h, factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn], fun h => by
rw [← h, prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf]⟩
#align nat.eq_factorization_iff Nat.eq_factorization_iff
/-- The equiv between `ℕ+` and `ℕ →₀ ℕ` with support in the primes. -/
def factorizationEquiv : ℕ+ ≃ { f : ℕ →₀ ℕ | ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p } where
toFun := fun ⟨n, _⟩ => ⟨n.factorization, fun _ => prime_of_mem_primeFactors⟩
invFun := fun ⟨f, hf⟩ =>
⟨f.prod _, prod_pow_pos_of_zero_not_mem_support fun H => not_prime_zero (hf 0 H)⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => Subtype.ext <| factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hx.ne.symm
right_inv := fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => Subtype.ext <| prod_pow_factorization_eq_self hf
#align nat.factorization_equiv Nat.factorizationEquiv
theorem factorizationEquiv_apply (n : ℕ+) : (factorizationEquiv n).1 = n.1.factorization := by
cases n
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_apply
theorem factorizationEquiv_inv_apply {f : ℕ →₀ ℕ} (hf : ∀ p ∈ f.support, Prime p) :
(factorizationEquiv.symm ⟨f, hf⟩).1 = f.prod (· ^ ·) :=
rfl
#align nat.factorization_equiv_inv_apply Nat.factorizationEquiv_inv_apply
/-! ### Generalisation of the "even part" and "odd part" of a natural number
We introduce the notations `ord_proj[p] n` for the largest power of the prime `p` that
divides `n` and `ord_compl[p] n` for the complementary part. The `ord` naming comes from
the $p$-adic order/valuation of a number, and `proj` and `compl` are for the projection and
complementary projection. The term `n.factorization p` is the $p$-adic order itself.
For example, `ord_proj[2] n` is the even part of `n` and `ord_compl[2] n` is the odd part. -/
-- Porting note: Lean 4 thinks we need `HPow` without this
set_option quotPrecheck false in
notation "ord_proj[" p "] " n:arg => p ^ Nat.factorization n p
notation "ord_compl[" p "] " n:arg => n / ord_proj[p] n
@[simp]
theorem ord_proj_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_proj[p] n = 1 := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime Nat.ord_proj_of_not_prime
@[simp]
theorem ord_compl_of_not_prime (n p : ℕ) (hp : ¬p.Prime) : ord_compl[p] n = n := by
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n hp]
#align nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime Nat.ord_compl_of_not_prime
theorem ord_proj_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n ∣ n := by
if hp : p.Prime then ?_ else simp [hp]
rw [← factors_count_eq]
apply dvd_of_factors_subperm (pow_ne_zero _ hp.ne_zero)
rw [hp.factors_pow, List.subperm_ext_iff]
intro q hq
simp [List.eq_of_mem_replicate hq]
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ∣ n :=
div_dvd_of_dvd (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd
theorem ord_proj_pos (n p : ℕ) : 0 < ord_proj[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then simp [pow_pos pp.pos] else simp [pp]
#align nat.ord_proj_pos Nat.ord_proj_pos
theorem ord_proj_le {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ord_proj[p] n ≤ n :=
le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt (Nat.ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_le Nat.ord_proj_le
theorem ord_compl_pos {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : 0 < ord_compl[p] n := by
if pp : p.Prime then
exact Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p hn) (ord_proj_pos n p)
else
simpa [Nat.factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.ord_compl_pos Nat.ord_compl_pos
theorem ord_compl_le (n p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] n ≤ n :=
Nat.div_le_self _ _
#align nat.ord_compl_le Nat.ord_compl_le
theorem ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self (n p : ℕ) : ord_proj[p] n * ord_compl[p] n = n :=
Nat.mul_div_cancel' (ord_proj_dvd n p)
#align nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self Nat.ord_proj_mul_ord_compl_eq_self
theorem ord_proj_mul {a b : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
ord_proj[p] (a * b) = ord_proj[p] a * ord_proj[p] b := by
simp [factorization_mul ha hb, pow_add]
#align nat.ord_proj_mul Nat.ord_proj_mul
theorem ord_compl_mul (a b p : ℕ) : ord_compl[p] (a * b) = ord_compl[p] a * ord_compl[p] b := by
if ha : a = 0 then simp [ha] else
if hb : b = 0 then simp [hb] else
simp only [ord_proj_mul p ha hb]
rw [div_mul_div_comm (ord_proj_dvd a p) (ord_proj_dvd b p)]
#align nat.ord_compl_mul Nat.ord_compl_mul
/-! ### Factorization and divisibility -/
#align nat.dvd_of_mem_factorization Nat.dvd_of_mem_primeFactors
/-- A crude upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_lt {n : ℕ} (p : ℕ) (hn : n ≠ 0) : n.factorization p < n := by
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· exact (pow_lt_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (ord_proj_le p hn).trans_lt <|
lt_pow_self pp.one_lt _
· simpa only [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp] using hn.bot_lt
#align nat.factorization_lt Nat.factorization_lt
/-- An upper bound on `n.factorization p` -/
theorem factorization_le_of_le_pow {n p b : ℕ} (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) : n.factorization p ≤ b := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then
exact (pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 ((ord_proj_le p hn).trans hb)
else
simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime n pp]
#align nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow Nat.factorization_le_of_le_pow
theorem factorization_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
d.factorization ≤ n.factorization ↔ d ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro hdn
set K := n.factorization - d.factorization with hK
use K.prod (· ^ ·)
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn, ← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hd,
← Finsupp.prod_add_index' pow_zero pow_add, hK, add_tsub_cancel_of_le hdn]
· rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
rw [factorization_mul hd (right_ne_zero_of_mul hn)]
simp
#align nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd
theorem factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → d.factorization p ≤ n.factorization p) ↔ d ∣ n := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
refine ⟨fun h p => (em p.Prime).elim (h p) fun hp => ?_, fun h p _ => h p⟩
simp_rw [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime _ hp]
rfl
#align nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd Nat.factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd
theorem pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (hp : p.Prime) :
¬p ^ (n.factorization p + 1) ∣ n := by
intro h
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos hp.pos _).ne' hn] at h
simpa [hp.factorization] using h p
#align nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd Nat.pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_left {a b : ℕ} (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha)
· simp
rw [factorization_le_iff_dvd ha <| mul_ne_zero ha hb]
exact Dvd.intro b rfl
#align nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left Nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_left
theorem factorization_le_factorization_mul_right {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b.factorization ≤ (a * b).factorization := by
rw [mul_comm]
apply factorization_le_factorization_mul_left ha
#align nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_right Nat.factorization_le_factorization_mul_right
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ k ≤ n.factorization p := by
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd (pow_pos pp.pos k).ne' hn, pp.factorization_pow, single_le_iff]
#align nat.prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization Nat.Prime.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization
theorem Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj {p k n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ^ k ∣ n ↔ p ^ k ∣ ord_proj[p] n := by
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
#align nat.prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj Nat.Prime.pow_dvd_iff_dvd_ord_proj
theorem Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization {p n : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
p ∣ n ↔ 1 ≤ n.factorization p :=
Iff.trans (by simp) (pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn)
#align nat.prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization
theorem exists_factorization_lt_of_lt {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hab : a < b) :
∃ p : ℕ, a.factorization p < b.factorization p := by
have hb : b ≠ 0 := (ha.bot_lt.trans hab).ne'
contrapose! hab
rw [← Finsupp.le_def, factorization_le_iff_dvd hb ha] at hab
exact le_of_dvd ha.bot_lt hab
#align nat.exists_factorization_lt_of_lt Nat.exists_factorization_lt_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem factorization_div {d n : ℕ} (h : d ∣ n) :
(n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd); · simp [zero_dvd_iff.mp h]
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn); · simp
apply add_left_injective d.factorization
simp only
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le <| (Nat.factorization_le_iff_dvd hd hn).mpr h, ←
Nat.factorization_mul (Nat.div_pos (Nat.le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h) hd.bot_lt).ne' hd,
Nat.div_mul_cancel h]
#align nat.factorization_div Nat.factorization_div
theorem dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (pp : p.Prime) (h : p ∣ n) : p ∣ ord_proj[p] n :=
dvd_pow_self p (Prime.factorization_pos_of_dvd pp hn h).ne'
#align nat.dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd Nat.dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd
theorem not_dvd_ord_compl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : ¬p ∣ ord_compl[p] n := by
rw [Nat.Prime.dvd_iff_one_le_factorization hp (ord_compl_pos p hn).ne']
rw [Nat.factorization_div (Nat.ord_proj_dvd n p)]
simp [hp.factorization]
#align nat.not_dvd_ord_compl Nat.not_dvd_ord_compl
theorem coprime_ord_compl {n p : ℕ} (hp : Prime p) (hn : n ≠ 0) : Coprime p (ord_compl[p] n) :=
(or_iff_left (not_dvd_ord_compl hp hn)).mp <| coprime_or_dvd_of_prime hp _
#align nat.coprime_ord_compl Nat.coprime_ord_compl
theorem factorization_ord_compl (n p : ℕ) :
(ord_compl[p] n).factorization = n.factorization.erase p := by
if hn : n = 0 then simp [hn] else
if pp : p.Prime then ?_ else
-- Porting note: needed to solve side goal explicitly
rw [Finsupp.erase_of_not_mem_support] <;> simp [pp]
ext q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp only [Finsupp.erase_same, factorization_eq_zero_iff, not_dvd_ord_compl pp hn]
simp
· rw [Finsupp.erase_ne hqp, factorization_div (ord_proj_dvd n p)]
simp [pp.factorization, hqp.symm]
#align nat.factorization_ord_compl Nat.factorization_ord_compl
-- `ord_compl[p] n` is the largest divisor of `n` not divisible by `p`.
theorem dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd {p d n : ℕ} (hdn : d ∣ n) (hpd : ¬p ∣ d) :
d ∣ ord_compl[p] n := by
if hn0 : n = 0 then simp [hn0] else
if hd0 : d = 0 then simp [hd0] at hpd else
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 (ord_compl_pos p hn0).ne', factorization_ord_compl]
intro q
if hqp : q = p then
simp [factorization_eq_zero_iff, hqp, hpd]
else
simp [hqp, (factorization_le_iff_dvd hd0 hn0).2 hdn q]
#align nat.dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd Nat.dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd_not_dvd
/-- If `n` is a nonzero natural number and `p ≠ 1`, then there are natural numbers `e`
and `n'` such that `n'` is not divisible by `p` and `n = p^e * n'`. -/
theorem exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) (p : ℕ) (hp : p ≠ 1) :
∃ e n' : ℕ, ¬p ∣ n' ∧ n = p ^ e * n' :=
let ⟨a', h₁, h₂⟩ :=
multiplicity.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
(multiplicity.finite_nat_iff.mpr ⟨hp, Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn⟩)
⟨_, a', h₂, h₁⟩
#align nat.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd Nat.exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub {d n : ℕ} (hd : d ≠ 0) (hdn : d ≤ n) :
d ∣ n ↔ (n / d).factorization = n.factorization - d.factorization := by
refine ⟨factorization_div, ?_⟩
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hdn with (rfl | hd_lt_n); · simp
have h1 : n / d ≠ 0 := fun H => Nat.lt_asymm hd_lt_n ((Nat.div_eq_zero_iff hd.bot_lt).mp H)
intro h
rw [dvd_iff_le_div_mul n d]
by_contra h2
cases' exists_factorization_lt_of_lt (mul_ne_zero h1 hd) (not_le.mp h2) with p hp
rwa [factorization_mul h1 hd, add_apply, ← lt_tsub_iff_right, h, tsub_apply,
lt_self_iff_false] at hp
#align nat.dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub Nat.dvd_iff_div_factorization_eq_tsub
theorem ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hb0 : b ≠ 0) (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ord_proj[p] a ∣ ord_proj[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp); · simp [pp]
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0); · simp
rw [pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right pp.one_lt]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab p
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd
theorem ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd {a b : ℕ} (ha0 : a ≠ 0) (hb0 : b ≠ 0) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ord_proj[p] a ∣ ord_proj[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_of_dvd hb0 hab p⟩
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0]
intro q
rcases le_or_lt q 1 with (hq_le | hq1)
· interval_cases q <;> simp
exact (pow_dvd_pow_iff_le_right hq1).1 (h q)
#align nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd Nat.ord_proj_dvd_ord_proj_iff_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ∣ b) (p : ℕ) :
ord_compl[p] a ∣ ord_compl[p] b := by
rcases em' p.Prime with (pp | pp)
· simp [pp, hab]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with (rfl | ha0)
· cases hb0 (zero_dvd_iff.1 hab)
have ha := (Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p ha0) (ord_proj_pos a p)).ne'
have hb := (Nat.div_pos (ord_proj_le p hb0) (ord_proj_pos b p)).ne'
rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd ha hb, factorization_ord_compl a p, factorization_ord_compl b p]
intro q
rcases eq_or_ne q p with (rfl | hqp)
· simp
simp_rw [erase_ne hqp]
exact (factorization_le_iff_dvd ha0 hb0).2 hab q
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd
theorem ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) :
(∀ p : ℕ, ord_compl[p] a ∣ ord_compl[p] b) ↔ a ∣ b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun hab p => ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_of_dvd hab p⟩
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with (rfl | hb0)
· simp
if pa : a.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pa] using h a
if pb : b.Prime then ?_ else simpa [pb] using h b
rw [prime_dvd_prime_iff_eq pa pb]
by_contra hab
apply pa.ne_one
rw [← Nat.dvd_one, ← Nat.mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hb0.bot_lt, mul_one]
simpa [Prime.factorization_self pb, Prime.factorization pa, hab] using h b
#align nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd Nat.ord_compl_dvd_ord_compl_iff_dvd
theorem dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd (n d : ℕ) :
d ∣ n ↔ ∀ p k : ℕ, Prime p → p ^ k ∣ d → p ^ k ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
rcases eq_or_ne d 0 with (rfl | hd)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff, hn, false_iff_iff, not_forall]
exact ⟨2, n, prime_two, dvd_zero _, mt (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt) (lt_two_pow n).not_le⟩
refine ⟨fun h p k _ hpkd => dvd_trans hpkd h, ?_⟩
rw [← factorization_prime_le_iff_dvd hd hn]
intro h p pp
simp_rw [← pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
exact h p _ pp (ord_proj_dvd _ _)
#align nat.dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd Nat.dvd_iff_prime_pow_dvd_dvd
theorem prod_primeFactors_dvd (n : ℕ) : ∏ p ∈ n.primeFactors, p ∣ n := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· subst hn
simp
simpa [prod_factors hn] using Multiset.toFinset_prod_dvd_prod (n.factors : Multiset ℕ)
#align nat.prod_prime_factors_dvd Nat.prod_primeFactors_dvd
theorem factorization_gcd {a b : ℕ} (ha_pos : a ≠ 0) (hb_pos : b ≠ 0) :
(gcd a b).factorization = a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization := by
let dfac := a.factorization ⊓ b.factorization
let d := dfac.prod (· ^ ·)
have dfac_prime : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ dfac.support → Prime p := by
intro p hp
have : p ∈ a.factors ∧ p ∈ b.factors := by simpa [dfac] using hp
exact prime_of_mem_factors this.1
have h1 : d.factorization = dfac := prod_pow_factorization_eq_self dfac_prime
have hd_pos : d ≠ 0 := (factorizationEquiv.invFun ⟨dfac, dfac_prime⟩).2.ne'
suffices d = gcd a b by rwa [← this]
apply gcd_greatest
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos ha_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_left
· rw [← factorization_le_iff_dvd hd_pos hb_pos, h1]
exact inf_le_right
· intro e hea heb
rcases Decidable.eq_or_ne e 0 with (rfl | he_pos)
· simp only [zero_dvd_iff] at hea
contradiction
have hea' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos ha_pos).mpr hea
have heb' := (factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hb_pos).mpr heb
simp [dfac, ← factorization_le_iff_dvd he_pos hd_pos, h1, hea', heb']
#align nat.factorization_gcd Nat.factorization_gcd
theorem factorization_lcm {a b : ℕ} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(a.lcm b).factorization = a.factorization ⊔ b.factorization := by
rw [← add_right_inj (a.gcd b).factorization, ←
factorization_mul (mt gcd_eq_zero_iff.1 fun h => ha h.1) (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), gcd_mul_lcm,
factorization_gcd ha hb, factorization_mul ha hb]
ext1
exact (min_add_max _ _).symm
#align nat.factorization_lcm Nat.factorization_lcm
/-- If `a = ∏ pᵢ ^ nᵢ` and `b = ∏ pᵢ ^ mᵢ`, then `factorizationLCMLeft = ∏ pᵢ ^ kᵢ`, where
`kᵢ = nᵢ` if `mᵢ ≤ nᵢ` and `0` otherwise. Note that the product is over the divisors of `lcm a b`,
so if one of `a` or `b` is `0` then the result is `1`. -/
def factorizationLCMLeft (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(Nat.lcm a b).factorization.prod fun p n ↦
if b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p then p ^ n else 1
/-- If `a = ∏ pᵢ ^ nᵢ` and `b = ∏ pᵢ ^ mᵢ`, then `factorizationLCMRight = ∏ pᵢ ^ kᵢ`, where
`kᵢ = mᵢ` if `nᵢ < mᵢ` and `0` otherwise. Note that the product is over the divisors of `lcm a b`,
so if one of `a` or `b` is `0` then the result is `1`.
Note that `factorizationLCMRight a b` is *not* `factorizationLCMLeft b a`: the difference is
that in `factorizationLCMLeft a b` there are the primes whose exponent in `a` is bigger or equal
than the exponent in `b`, while in `factorizationLCMRight a b` there are the primes whose
exponent in `b` is strictly bigger than in `a`. For example `factorizationLCMLeft 2 2 = 2`, but
`factorizationLCMRight 2 2 = 1`. -/
def factorizationLCMRight (a b : ℕ) :=
(Nat.lcm a b).factorization.prod fun p n ↦
if b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p then 1 else p ^ n
variable (a b)
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_left : factorizationLCMLeft 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_zero_right : factorizationLCMLeft a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCRight_zero_left : factorizationLCMRight 0 b = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
@[simp]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_zero_right : factorizationLCMRight a 0 = 1 := by
simp [factorizationLCMRight]
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMLeft a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
· simp only [h, reduceIte, one_ne_zero] at H
lemma factorizationLCMRight_pos :
0 < factorizationLCMRight a b := by
apply Nat.pos_of_ne_zero
rw [factorizationLCMRight, Finsupp.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro p _ H
by_cases h : b.factorization p ≤ a.factorization p
· simp only [h, reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
· simp only [h, ↓reduceIte, pow_eq_zero_iff', ne_eq] at H
simpa [H.1] using H.2
lemma coprime_factorizationLCMLeft_factorizationLCMRight :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b).Coprime (factorizationLCMRight a b) := by
rw [factorizationLCMLeft, factorizationLCMRight]
refine coprime_prod_left_iff.mpr fun p hp ↦ coprime_prod_right_iff.mpr fun q hq ↦ ?_
dsimp only; split_ifs with h h'
any_goals simp only [coprime_one_right_eq_true, coprime_one_left_eq_true]
refine coprime_pow_primes _ _ (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp) (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hq) ?_
contrapose! h'; rwa [← h']
variable {a b}
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_mul_factorizationLCMRight (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
(factorizationLCMLeft a b) * (factorizationLCMRight a b) = lcm a b := by
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self (lcm_ne_zero ha hb), factorizationLCMLeft,
factorizationLCMRight, ← prod_mul]
congr; ext p n; split_ifs <;> simp
variable (a b)
lemma factorizationLCMLeft_dvd_left : factorizationLCMLeft a b ∣ a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp only [dvd_zero]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp [factorizationLCMLeft]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self ha]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le le_rfl le
· apply one_dvd
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inl <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
lemma factorizationLCMRight_dvd_right : factorizationLCMRight a b ∣ b := by
rcases eq_or_ne a 0 with rfl | ha
· simp [factorizationLCMRight]
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with rfl | hb
· simp only [dvd_zero]
nth_rewrite 2 [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hb]
rw [prod_of_support_subset (s := (lcm a b).factorization.support)]
· apply Finset.prod_dvd_prod_of_dvd; rintro p -; dsimp only; split_ifs with le
· apply one_dvd
· rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; apply pow_dvd_pow; exact sup_le (not_le.1 le).le le_rfl
· intro p hp; rw [mem_support_iff] at hp ⊢
rw [factorization_lcm ha hb]; exact (lt_sup_iff.mpr <| .inr <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hp).ne'
· intros; rw [pow_zero]
@[to_additive sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul]
theorem prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (m n : ℕ)
(f : ℕ → β) :
(m.gcd n).primeFactors.prod f * (m * n).primeFactors.prod f =
m.primeFactors.prod f * n.primeFactors.prod f := by
obtain rfl | hm₀ := eq_or_ne m 0
· simp
obtain rfl | hn₀ := eq_or_ne n 0
· simp
· rw [primeFactors_mul hm₀ hn₀, primeFactors_gcd hm₀ hn₀, mul_comm, Finset.prod_union_inter]
#align nat.prod_factors_gcd_mul_prod_factors_mul Nat.prod_primeFactors_gcd_mul_prod_primeFactors_mul
#align nat.sum_factors_gcd_add_sum_factors_mul Nat.sum_primeFactors_gcd_add_sum_primeFactors_mul
theorem setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization {n p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) :
{ i : ℕ | i ≠ 0 ∧ p ^ i ∣ n } = Set.Icc 1 (n.factorization p) := by
ext
simp [Nat.lt_succ_iff, one_le_iff_ne_zero, pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn]
#align nat.set_of_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization Nat.setOf_pow_dvd_eq_Icc_factorization
/-- The set of positive powers of prime `p` that divide `n` is exactly the set of
positive natural numbers up to `n.factorization p`. -/
theorem Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : Prime p) :
Icc 1 (n.factorization p) = (Ico 1 n).filter fun i : ℕ => p ^ i ∣ n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 0 with (rfl | hn)
· simp
ext x
simp only [mem_Icc, Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, and_assoc, and_congr_right_iff,
pp.pow_dvd_iff_le_factorization hn, iff_and_self]
exact fun _ H => lt_of_le_of_lt H (factorization_lt p hn)
#align nat.Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd Nat.Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd
theorem factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd (n : ℕ) {p : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) :
n.factorization p = ((Ico 1 n).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n).card := by
simp [← Icc_factorization_eq_pow_dvd n pp]
#align nat.factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd Nat.factorization_eq_card_pow_dvd
theorem Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq {n p b : ℕ} (pp : p.Prime) (hn : n ≠ 0) (hb : n ≤ p ^ b) :
((Ico 1 n).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n) = (Icc 1 b).filter fun i => p ^ i ∣ n := by
ext x
simp only [Finset.mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Icc, and_congr_left_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro h1 -
exact iff_of_true (lt_of_pow_dvd_right hn pp.two_le h1) <|
(pow_le_pow_iff_right pp.one_lt).1 <| (le_of_dvd hn.bot_lt h1).trans hb
#align nat.Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq Nat.Ico_filter_pow_dvd_eq
/-! ### Factorization and coprimes -/
/-- For coprime `a` and `b`, the power of `p` in `a * b` is the sum of the powers in `a` and `b` -/
theorem factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p + b.factorization p := by
simp only [← factors_count_eq, perm_iff_count.mp (perm_factors_mul_of_coprime hab), count_append]
#align nat.factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime Nat.factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime
/-- For coprime `a` and `b`, the power of `p` in `a * b` is the sum of the powers in `a` and `b` -/
theorem factorization_mul_of_coprime {a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) :
(a * b).factorization = a.factorization + b.factorization := by
ext q
rw [Finsupp.add_apply, factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab]
#align nat.factorization_mul_of_coprime Nat.factorization_mul_of_coprime
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `a` then the power of `p` in `a` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `b` coprime to `a`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_left {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) (hpa : p ∈ a.factors) :
(a * b).factorization p = a.factorization p := by
rw [factorization_mul_apply_of_coprime hab, ← factors_count_eq, ← factors_count_eq,
count_eq_zero_of_not_mem (coprime_factors_disjoint hab hpa), add_zero]
#align nat.factorization_eq_of_coprime_left Nat.factorization_eq_of_coprime_left
/-- If `p` is a prime factor of `b` then the power of `p` in `b` is the same that in `a * b`,
for any `a` coprime to `b`. -/
theorem factorization_eq_of_coprime_right {p a b : ℕ} (hab : Coprime a b) (hpb : p ∈ b.factors) :
(a * b).factorization p = b.factorization p := by
rw [mul_comm]
exact factorization_eq_of_coprime_left (coprime_comm.mp hab) hpb
#align nat.factorization_eq_of_coprime_right Nat.factorization_eq_of_coprime_right
#align nat.factorization_disjoint_of_coprime Nat.Coprime.disjoint_primeFactors
#align nat.factorization_mul_support_of_coprime Nat.primeFactors_mul
/-! ### Induction principles involving factorizations -/
/-- Given `P 0, P 1` and a way to extend `P a` to `P (p ^ n * a)` for prime `p` not dividing `a`,
we can define `P` for all natural numbers. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnPrimePow {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h0 : P 0) (h1 : P 1)
(h : ∀ a p n : ℕ, p.Prime → ¬p ∣ a → 0 < n → P a → P (p ^ n * a)) : ∀ a : ℕ, P a := fun a =>
Nat.strongRecOn a fun n =>
match n with
| 0 => fun _ => h0
| 1 => fun _ => h1
| k + 2 => fun hk => by
letI p := (k + 2).minFac
haveI hp : Prime p := minFac_prime (succ_succ_ne_one k)
letI t := (k + 2).factorization p
haveI hpt : p ^ t ∣ k + 2 := ord_proj_dvd _ _
haveI htp : 0 < t := hp.factorization_pos_of_dvd (k + 1).succ_ne_zero (k + 2).minFac_dvd
convert h ((k + 2) / p ^ t) p t hp _ htp (hk _ (Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul _)) using 1
· rw [Nat.mul_div_cancel' hpt]
· rw [Nat.dvd_div_iff hpt, ← Nat.pow_succ]
exact pow_succ_factorization_not_dvd (k + 1).succ_ne_zero hp
· simp [lt_mul_iff_one_lt_left Nat.succ_pos', one_lt_pow_iff htp.ne', hp.one_lt]
#align nat.rec_on_prime_pow Nat.recOnPrimePow
/-- Given `P 0`, `P 1`, and `P (p ^ n)` for positive prime powers, and a way to extend `P a` and
`P b` to `P (a * b)` when `a, b` are positive coprime, we can define `P` for all natural numbers. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnPosPrimePosCoprime {P : ℕ → Sort*} (hp : ∀ p n : ℕ, Prime p → 0 < n → P (p ^ n))
(h0 : P 0) (h1 : P 1) (h : ∀ a b, 1 < a → 1 < b → Coprime a b → P a → P b → P (a * b)) :
∀ a, P a :=
recOnPrimePow h0 h1 <| by
intro a p n hp' hpa hn hPa
by_cases ha1 : a = 1
· rw [ha1, mul_one]
exact hp p n hp' hn
refine h (p ^ n) a (hp'.one_lt.trans_le (le_self_pow hn.ne' _)) ?_ ?_ (hp _ _ hp' hn) hPa
· contrapose! hpa
simp [lt_one_iff.1 (lt_of_le_of_ne hpa ha1)]
· simpa [hn, Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp']
#align nat.rec_on_pos_prime_pos_coprime Nat.recOnPosPrimePosCoprime
/-- Given `P 0`, `P (p ^ n)` for all prime powers, and a way to extend `P a` and `P b` to
`P (a * b)` when `a, b` are positive coprime, we can define `P` for all natural numbers. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnPrimeCoprime {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h0 : P 0) (hp : ∀ p n : ℕ, Prime p → P (p ^ n))
(h : ∀ a b, 1 < a → 1 < b → Coprime a b → P a → P b → P (a * b)) : ∀ a, P a :=
recOnPosPrimePosCoprime (fun p n h _ => hp p n h) h0 (hp 2 0 prime_two) h
#align nat.rec_on_prime_coprime Nat.recOnPrimeCoprime
/-- Given `P 0`, `P 1`, `P p` for all primes, and a way to extend `P a` and `P b` to
`P (a * b)`, we can define `P` for all natural numbers. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def recOnMul {P : ℕ → Sort*} (h0 : P 0) (h1 : P 1) (hp : ∀ p, Prime p → P p)
(h : ∀ a b, P a → P b → P (a * b)) : ∀ a, P a :=
let rec
/-- The predicate holds on prime powers -/
hp'' (p n : ℕ) (hp' : Prime p) : P (p ^ n) :=
match n with
| 0 => h1
| n + 1 => h _ _ (hp'' p n hp') (hp p hp')
recOnPrimeCoprime h0 hp'' fun a b _ _ _ => h a b
#align nat.rec_on_mul Nat.recOnMul
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` with `f 1 = 1` and any `n ≠ 0`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
theorem multiplicative_factorization {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β)
(h_mult : ∀ x y : ℕ, Coprime x y → f (x * y) = f x * f y) (hf : f 1 = 1) :
∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) := by
apply Nat.recOnPosPrimePosCoprime
· rintro p k hp - -
-- Porting note: replaced `simp` with `rw`
rw [Prime.factorization_pow hp, Finsupp.prod_single_index _]
rwa [pow_zero]
· simp
· rintro -
rw [factorization_one, hf]
simp
· intro a b _ _ hab ha hb hab_pos
rw [h_mult a b hab, ha (left_ne_zero_of_mul hab_pos), hb (right_ne_zero_of_mul hab_pos),
factorization_mul_of_coprime hab, ← prod_add_index_of_disjoint]
exact hab.disjoint_primeFactors
#align nat.multiplicative_factorization Nat.multiplicative_factorization
/-- For any multiplicative function `f` with `f 1 = 1` and `f 0 = 1`,
we can evaluate `f n` by evaluating `f` at `p ^ k` over the factorization of `n` -/
theorem multiplicative_factorization' {β : Type*} [CommMonoid β] (f : ℕ → β)
(h_mult : ∀ x y : ℕ, Coprime x y → f (x * y) = f x * f y) (hf0 : f 0 = 1) (hf1 : f 1 = 1) :
f n = n.factorization.prod fun p k => f (p ^ k) := by
obtain rfl | hn := eq_or_ne n 0
· simpa
· exact multiplicative_factorization _ h_mult hf1 hn
#align nat.multiplicative_factorization' Nat.multiplicative_factorization'
/-- Two positive naturals are equal if their prime padic valuations are equal -/
theorem eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq (a b : ℕ) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a = b ↔ ∀ p : ℕ, p.Prime → padicValNat p a = padicValNat p b := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp
· intro h
refine eq_of_factorization_eq ha hb fun p => ?_
by_cases pp : p.Prime
· simp [factorization_def, pp, h p pp]
· simp [factorization_eq_zero_of_non_prime, pp]
#align nat.eq_iff_prime_padic_val_nat_eq Nat.eq_iff_prime_padicValNat_eq
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Factorization/Basic.lean | 946 | 961 | theorem prod_pow_prime_padicValNat (n : Nat) (hn : n ≠ 0) (m : Nat) (pr : n < m) :
(∏ p ∈ Finset.filter Nat.Prime (Finset.range m), p ^ padicValNat p n) = n := by |
-- Porting note: was `nth_rw_rhs`
conv =>
rhs
rw [← factorization_prod_pow_eq_self hn]
rw [eq_comm]
apply Finset.prod_subset_one_on_sdiff
· exact fun p hp => Finset.mem_filter.mpr ⟨Finset.mem_range.2 <| pr.trans_le' <|
le_of_mem_primeFactors hp, prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp⟩
· intro p hp
cases' Finset.mem_sdiff.mp hp with hp1 hp2
rw [← factorization_def n (Finset.mem_filter.mp hp1).2]
simp [Finsupp.not_mem_support_iff.mp hp2]
· intro p hp
simp [factorization_def n (prime_of_mem_primeFactors hp)]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Hom
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.QuotientOperations
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
#align_import analysis.normed.group.quotient from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"2196ab363eb097c008d4497125e0dde23fb36db2"
/-!
# Quotients of seminormed groups
For any `SeminormedAddCommGroup M` and any `S : AddSubgroup M`, we provide a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup`, the group quotient `M ⧸ S`.
If `S` is closed, we provide `NormedAddCommGroup (M ⧸ S)` (regardless of whether `M` itself is
separated). The two main properties of these structures are the underlying topology is the quotient
topology and the projection is a normed group homomorphism which is norm non-increasing
(better, it has operator norm exactly one unless `S` is dense in `M`). The corresponding
universal property is that every normed group hom defined on `M` which vanishes on `S` descends
to a normed group hom defined on `M ⧸ S`.
This file also introduces a predicate `IsQuotient` characterizing normed group homs that
are isomorphic to the canonical projection onto a normed group quotient.
In addition, this file also provides normed structures for quotients of modules by submodules, and
of (commutative) rings by ideals. The `SeminormedAddCommGroup` and `NormedAddCommGroup`
instances described above are transferred directly, but we also define instances of `NormedSpace`,
`SeminormedCommRing`, `NormedCommRing` and `NormedAlgebra` under appropriate type class
assumptions on the original space. Moreover, while `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace` works
out-of-the-box for quotients of `NormedAddCommGroup`s by `AddSubgroup`s, we need to transfer
this instance in `Submodule.Quotient.completeSpace` so that it applies to these other quotients.
## Main definitions
We use `M` and `N` to denote seminormed groups and `S : AddSubgroup M`.
All the following definitions are in the `AddSubgroup` namespace. Hence we can access
`AddSubgroup.normedMk S` as `S.normedMk`.
* `seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient` : The seminormed group structure on the quotient by
an additive subgroup. This is an instance so there is no need to explicitly use it.
* `normedAddCommGroupQuotient` : The normed group structure on the quotient by
a closed additive subgroup. This is an instance so there is no need to explicitly use it.
* `normedMk S` : the normed group hom from `M` to `M ⧸ S`.
* `lift S f hf`: implements the universal property of `M ⧸ S`. Here
`(f : NormedAddGroupHom M N)`, `(hf : ∀ s ∈ S, f s = 0)` and
`lift S f hf : NormedAddGroupHom (M ⧸ S) N`.
* `IsQuotient`: given `f : NormedAddGroupHom M N`, `IsQuotient f` means `N` is isomorphic
to a quotient of `M` by a subgroup, with projection `f`. Technically it asserts `f` is
surjective and the norm of `f x` is the infimum of the norms of `x + m` for `m` in `f.ker`.
## Main results
* `norm_normedMk` : the operator norm of the projection is `1` if the subspace is not dense.
* `IsQuotient.norm_lift`: Provided `f : normed_hom M N` satisfies `IsQuotient f`, for every
`n : N` and positive `ε`, there exists `m` such that `f m = n ∧ ‖m‖ < ‖n‖ + ε`.
## Implementation details
For any `SeminormedAddCommGroup M` and any `S : AddSubgroup M` we define a norm on `M ⧸ S` by
`‖x‖ = sInf (norm '' {m | mk' S m = x})`. This formula is really an implementation detail, it
shouldn't be needed outside of this file setting up the theory.
Since `M ⧸ S` is automatically a topological space (as any quotient of a topological space),
one needs to be careful while defining the `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance to avoid having two
different topologies on this quotient. This is not purely a technological issue.
Mathematically there is something to prove. The main point is proved in the auxiliary lemma
`quotient_nhd_basis` that has no use beyond this verification and states that zero in the quotient
admits as basis of neighborhoods in the quotient topology the sets `{x | ‖x‖ < ε}` for positive `ε`.
Once this mathematical point is settled, we have two topologies that are propositionally equal. This
is not good enough for the type class system. As usual we ensure *definitional* equality
using forgetful inheritance, see Note [forgetful inheritance]. A (semi)-normed group structure
includes a uniform space structure which includes a topological space structure, together
with propositional fields asserting compatibility conditions.
The usual way to define a `SeminormedAddCommGroup` is to let Lean build a uniform space structure
using the provided norm, and then trivially build a proof that the norm and uniform structure are
compatible. Here the uniform structure is provided using `TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace`
which uses the topological structure and the group structure to build the uniform structure. This
uniform structure induces the correct topological structure by construction, but the fact that it
is compatible with the norm is not obvious; this is where the mathematical content explained in
the previous paragraph kicks in.
-/
noncomputable section
open QuotientAddGroup Metric Set Topology NNReal
variable {M N : Type*} [SeminormedAddCommGroup M] [SeminormedAddCommGroup N]
/-- The definition of the norm on the quotient by an additive subgroup. -/
noncomputable instance normOnQuotient (S : AddSubgroup M) : Norm (M ⧸ S) where
norm x := sInf (norm '' { m | mk' S m = x })
#align norm_on_quotient normOnQuotient
theorem AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
‖x‖ = sInf (norm '' { m : M | (m : M ⧸ S) = x }) :=
rfl
#align add_subgroup.quotient_norm_eq AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_eq_infDist {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
‖x‖ = infDist 0 { m : M | (m : M ⧸ S) = x } := by
simp only [AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq, infDist_eq_iInf, sInf_image', dist_zero_left]
/-- An alternative definition of the norm on the quotient group: the norm of `((x : M) : M ⧸ S)` is
equal to the distance from `x` to `S`. -/
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_mk {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M) :
‖(x : M ⧸ S)‖ = infDist x S := by
rw [norm_eq_infDist, ← infDist_image (IsometryEquiv.subLeft x).isometry,
IsometryEquiv.subLeft_apply, sub_zero, ← IsometryEquiv.preimage_symm]
congr 1 with y
simp only [mem_preimage, IsometryEquiv.subLeft_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq, QuotientAddGroup.eq,
neg_add, neg_neg, neg_add_cancel_right, SetLike.mem_coe]
theorem image_norm_nonempty {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
(norm '' { m | mk' S m = x }).Nonempty :=
.image _ <| Quot.exists_rep x
#align image_norm_nonempty image_norm_nonempty
theorem bddBelow_image_norm (s : Set M) : BddBelow (norm '' s) :=
⟨0, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _⟩
#align bdd_below_image_norm bddBelow_image_norm
theorem isGLB_quotient_norm {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) :
IsGLB (norm '' { m | mk' S m = x }) (‖x‖) :=
isGLB_csInf (image_norm_nonempty x) (bddBelow_image_norm _)
/-- The norm on the quotient satisfies `‖-x‖ = ‖x‖`. -/
theorem quotient_norm_neg {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) : ‖-x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [AddSubgroup.quotient_norm_eq]
congr 1 with r
constructor <;> { rintro ⟨m, hm, rfl⟩; use -m; simpa [neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] using hm }
#align quotient_norm_neg quotient_norm_neg
theorem quotient_norm_sub_rev {S : AddSubgroup M} (x y : M ⧸ S) : ‖x - y‖ = ‖y - x‖ := by
rw [← neg_sub, quotient_norm_neg]
#align quotient_norm_sub_rev quotient_norm_sub_rev
/-- The norm of the projection is smaller or equal to the norm of the original element. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_le (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : ‖mk' S m‖ ≤ ‖m‖ :=
csInf_le (bddBelow_image_norm _) <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ rfl
#align quotient_norm_mk_le quotient_norm_mk_le
/-- The norm of the projection is smaller or equal to the norm of the original element. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_le' (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : ‖(m : M ⧸ S)‖ ≤ ‖m‖ :=
quotient_norm_mk_le S m
#align quotient_norm_mk_le' quotient_norm_mk_le'
/-- The norm of the image under the natural morphism to the quotient. -/
theorem quotient_norm_mk_eq (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) :
‖mk' S m‖ = sInf ((‖m + ·‖) '' S) := by
rw [mk'_apply, norm_mk, sInf_image', ← infDist_image isometry_neg, image_neg,
neg_coe_set (H := S), infDist_eq_iInf]
simp only [dist_eq_norm', sub_neg_eq_add, add_comm]
#align quotient_norm_mk_eq quotient_norm_mk_eq
/-- The quotient norm is nonnegative. -/
theorem quotient_norm_nonneg (S : AddSubgroup M) (x : M ⧸ S) : 0 ≤ ‖x‖ :=
Real.sInf_nonneg _ <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ _ ↦ norm_nonneg _
#align quotient_norm_nonneg quotient_norm_nonneg
/-- The quotient norm is nonnegative. -/
theorem norm_mk_nonneg (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : 0 ≤ ‖mk' S m‖ :=
quotient_norm_nonneg S _
#align norm_mk_nonneg norm_mk_nonneg
/-- The norm of the image of `m : M` in the quotient by `S` is zero if and only if `m` belongs
to the closure of `S`. -/
theorem quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) :
‖mk' S m‖ = 0 ↔ m ∈ closure (S : Set M) := by
rw [mk'_apply, norm_mk, ← mem_closure_iff_infDist_zero]
exact ⟨0, S.zero_mem⟩
#align quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff
theorem QuotientAddGroup.norm_lt_iff {S : AddSubgroup M} {x : M ⧸ S} {r : ℝ} :
‖x‖ < r ↔ ∃ m : M, ↑m = x ∧ ‖m‖ < r := by
rw [isGLB_lt_iff (isGLB_quotient_norm _), exists_mem_image]
rfl
/-- For any `x : M ⧸ S` and any `0 < ε`, there is `m : M` such that `mk' S m = x`
and `‖m‖ < ‖x‖ + ε`. -/
theorem norm_mk_lt {S : AddSubgroup M} (x : M ⧸ S) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ m : M, mk' S m = x ∧ ‖m‖ < ‖x‖ + ε :=
norm_lt_iff.1 <| lt_add_of_pos_right _ hε
#align norm_mk_lt norm_mk_lt
/-- For any `m : M` and any `0 < ε`, there is `s ∈ S` such that `‖m + s‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε`. -/
theorem norm_mk_lt' (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ s ∈ S, ‖m + s‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε := by
obtain ⟨n : M, hn : mk' S n = mk' S m, hn' : ‖n‖ < ‖mk' S m‖ + ε⟩ :=
norm_mk_lt (QuotientAddGroup.mk' S m) hε
erw [eq_comm, QuotientAddGroup.eq] at hn
use -m + n, hn
rwa [add_neg_cancel_left]
#align norm_mk_lt' norm_mk_lt'
set_option backward.synthInstance.canonInstances false in -- See https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/12532
/-- The quotient norm satisfies the triangle inequality. -/
theorem quotient_norm_add_le (S : AddSubgroup M) (x y : M ⧸ S) : ‖x + y‖ ≤ ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rcases And.intro (mk_surjective x) (mk_surjective y) with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [← mk'_apply, ← map_add, quotient_norm_mk_eq, sInf_image']
refine le_ciInf_add_ciInf fun a b ↦ ?_
refine ciInf_le_of_le ⟨0, forall_mem_range.2 fun _ ↦ norm_nonneg _⟩ (a + b) ?_
exact (congr_arg norm (add_add_add_comm _ _ _ _)).trans_le (norm_add_le _ _)
#align quotient_norm_add_le quotient_norm_add_le
/-- The quotient norm of `0` is `0`. -/
theorem norm_mk_zero (S : AddSubgroup M) : ‖(0 : M ⧸ S)‖ = 0 := by
erw [quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff]
exact subset_closure S.zero_mem
#align norm_mk_zero norm_mk_zero
/-- If `(m : M)` has norm equal to `0` in `M ⧸ S` for a closed subgroup `S` of `M`, then
`m ∈ S`. -/
theorem norm_mk_eq_zero (S : AddSubgroup M) (hS : IsClosed (S : Set M)) (m : M)
(h : ‖mk' S m‖ = 0) : m ∈ S := by rwa [quotient_norm_eq_zero_iff, hS.closure_eq] at h
#align norm_zero_eq_zero norm_mk_eq_zero
theorem quotient_nhd_basis (S : AddSubgroup M) :
(𝓝 (0 : M ⧸ S)).HasBasis (fun ε ↦ 0 < ε) fun ε ↦ { x | ‖x‖ < ε } := by
have : ∀ ε : ℝ, mk '' ball (0 : M) ε = { x : M ⧸ S | ‖x‖ < ε } := by
refine fun ε ↦ Set.ext <| forall_mk.2 fun x ↦ ?_
rw [ball_zero_eq, mem_setOf_eq, norm_lt_iff, mem_image]
exact exists_congr fun _ ↦ and_comm
rw [← mk_zero, nhds_eq, ← funext this]
exact .map _ Metric.nhds_basis_ball
#align quotient_nhd_basis quotient_nhd_basis
/-- The seminormed group structure on the quotient by an additive subgroup. -/
noncomputable instance AddSubgroup.seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient (S : AddSubgroup M) :
SeminormedAddCommGroup (M ⧸ S) where
dist x y := ‖x - y‖
dist_self x := by simp only [norm_mk_zero, sub_self]
dist_comm := quotient_norm_sub_rev
dist_triangle x y z := by
refine le_trans ?_ (quotient_norm_add_le _ _ _)
exact (congr_arg norm (sub_add_sub_cancel _ _ _).symm).le
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
toUniformSpace := TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace (M ⧸ S)
uniformity_dist := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero', ((quotient_nhd_basis S).comap _).eq_biInf]
simp only [dist, quotient_norm_sub_rev (Prod.fst _), preimage_setOf_eq]
#align add_subgroup.seminormed_add_comm_group_quotient AddSubgroup.seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient
-- This is a sanity check left here on purpose to ensure that potential refactors won't destroy
-- this important property.
example (S : AddSubgroup M) :
(instTopologicalSpaceQuotient : TopologicalSpace <| M ⧸ S) =
S.seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- The quotient in the category of normed groups. -/
noncomputable instance AddSubgroup.normedAddCommGroupQuotient (S : AddSubgroup M)
[IsClosed (S : Set M)] : NormedAddCommGroup (M ⧸ S) :=
{ AddSubgroup.seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient S, MetricSpace.ofT0PseudoMetricSpace _ with }
#align add_subgroup.normed_add_comm_group_quotient AddSubgroup.normedAddCommGroupQuotient
-- This is a sanity check left here on purpose to ensure that potential refactors won't destroy
-- this important property.
example (S : AddSubgroup M) [IsClosed (S : Set M)] :
S.seminormedAddCommGroupQuotient = NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup :=
rfl
namespace AddSubgroup
open NormedAddGroupHom
/-- The morphism from a seminormed group to the quotient by a subgroup. -/
noncomputable def normedMk (S : AddSubgroup M) : NormedAddGroupHom M (M ⧸ S) :=
{ QuotientAddGroup.mk' S with
bound' := ⟨1, fun m => by simpa [one_mul] using quotient_norm_mk_le _ m⟩ }
#align add_subgroup.normed_mk AddSubgroup.normedMk
/-- `S.normedMk` agrees with `QuotientAddGroup.mk' S`. -/
@[simp]
theorem normedMk.apply (S : AddSubgroup M) (m : M) : normedMk S m = QuotientAddGroup.mk' S m :=
rfl
#align add_subgroup.normed_mk.apply AddSubgroup.normedMk.apply
/-- `S.normedMk` is surjective. -/
theorem surjective_normedMk (S : AddSubgroup M) : Function.Surjective (normedMk S) :=
surjective_quot_mk _
#align add_subgroup.surjective_normed_mk AddSubgroup.surjective_normedMk
/-- The kernel of `S.normedMk` is `S`. -/
theorem ker_normedMk (S : AddSubgroup M) : S.normedMk.ker = S :=
QuotientAddGroup.ker_mk' _
#align add_subgroup.ker_normed_mk AddSubgroup.ker_normedMk
/-- The operator norm of the projection is at most `1`. -/
theorem norm_normedMk_le (S : AddSubgroup M) : ‖S.normedMk‖ ≤ 1 :=
NormedAddGroupHom.opNorm_le_bound _ zero_le_one fun m => by simp [quotient_norm_mk_le']
#align add_subgroup.norm_normed_mk_le AddSubgroup.norm_normedMk_le
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Quotient.lean | 307 | 316 | theorem _root_.QuotientAddGroup.norm_lift_apply_le {S : AddSubgroup M} (f : NormedAddGroupHom M N)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ S, f x = 0) (x : M ⧸ S) : ‖lift S f.toAddMonoidHom hf x‖ ≤ ‖f‖ * ‖x‖ := by |
cases (norm_nonneg f).eq_or_gt with
| inl h =>
rcases mk_surjective x with ⟨x, rfl⟩
simpa [h] using le_opNorm f x
| inr h =>
rw [← not_lt, ← _root_.lt_div_iff' h, norm_lt_iff]
rintro ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩
exact ((lt_div_iff' h).1 hx).not_le (le_opNorm f x)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joanna Choules. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joanna Choules
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Subgraph
#align_import combinatorics.simple_graph.finsubgraph from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"c6ef6387ede9983aee397d442974e61f89dfd87b"
/-!
# Homomorphisms from finite subgraphs
This file defines the type of finite subgraphs of a `SimpleGraph` and proves a compactness result
for homomorphisms to a finite codomain.
## Main statements
* `SimpleGraph.nonempty_hom_of_forall_finite_subgraph_hom`: If every finite subgraph of a (possibly
infinite) graph `G` has a homomorphism to some finite graph `F`, then there is also a homomorphism
`G →g F`.
## Notations
`→fg` is a module-local variant on `→g` where the domain is a finite subgraph of some supergraph
`G`.
## Implementation notes
The proof here uses compactness as formulated in `nonempty_sections_of_finite_inverse_system`. For
finite subgraphs `G'' ≤ G'`, the inverse system `finsubgraphHomFunctor` restricts homomorphisms
`G' →fg F` to domain `G''`.
-/
open Set CategoryTheory
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {W : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {F : SimpleGraph W}
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- The subtype of `G.subgraph` comprising those subgraphs with finite vertex sets. -/
abbrev Finsubgraph (G : SimpleGraph V) :=
{ G' : G.Subgraph // G'.verts.Finite }
#align simple_graph.finsubgraph SimpleGraph.Finsubgraph
/-- A graph homomorphism from a finite subgraph of G to F. -/
abbrev FinsubgraphHom (G' : G.Finsubgraph) (F : SimpleGraph W) :=
G'.val.coe →g F
#align simple_graph.finsubgraph_hom SimpleGraph.FinsubgraphHom
local infixl:50 " →fg " => FinsubgraphHom
instance : OrderBot G.Finsubgraph where
bot := ⟨⊥, finite_empty⟩
bot_le _ := bot_le (α := G.Subgraph)
instance : Sup G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨fun G₁ G₂ => ⟨G₁ ⊔ G₂, G₁.2.union G₂.2⟩⟩
instance : Inf G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨fun G₁ G₂ => ⟨G₁ ⊓ G₂, G₁.2.subset inter_subset_left⟩⟩
instance : DistribLattice G.Finsubgraph :=
Subtype.coe_injective.distribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
instance [Finite V] : Top G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨⟨⊤, finite_univ⟩⟩
instance [Finite V] : SupSet G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨fun s => ⟨⨆ G ∈ s, ↑G, Set.toFinite _⟩⟩
instance [Finite V] : InfSet G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨fun s => ⟨⨅ G ∈ s, ↑G, Set.toFinite _⟩⟩
instance [Finite V] : CompletelyDistribLattice G.Finsubgraph :=
Subtype.coe_injective.completelyDistribLattice _ (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl)
(fun _ => rfl) rfl rfl
/-- The finite subgraph of G generated by a single vertex. -/
def singletonFinsubgraph (v : V) : G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨SimpleGraph.singletonSubgraph _ v, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.singleton_finsubgraph SimpleGraph.singletonFinsubgraph
/-- The finite subgraph of G generated by a single edge. -/
def finsubgraphOfAdj {u v : V} (e : G.Adj u v) : G.Finsubgraph :=
⟨SimpleGraph.subgraphOfAdj _ e, by simp⟩
#align simple_graph.finsubgraph_of_adj SimpleGraph.finsubgraphOfAdj
-- Lemmas establishing the ordering between edge- and vertex-generated subgraphs.
theorem singletonFinsubgraph_le_adj_left {u v : V} {e : G.Adj u v} :
singletonFinsubgraph u ≤ finsubgraphOfAdj e := by
simp [singletonFinsubgraph, finsubgraphOfAdj]
#align simple_graph.singleton_finsubgraph_le_adj_left SimpleGraph.singletonFinsubgraph_le_adj_left
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Finsubgraph.lean | 98 | 100 | theorem singletonFinsubgraph_le_adj_right {u v : V} {e : G.Adj u v} :
singletonFinsubgraph v ≤ finsubgraphOfAdj e := by |
simp [singletonFinsubgraph, finsubgraphOfAdj]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Archimedean
#align_import number_theory.zsqrtd.gaussian_int from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"5b2fe80501ff327b9109fb09b7cc8c325cd0d7d9"
/-!
# Gaussian integers
The Gaussian integers are complex integer, complex numbers whose real and imaginary parts are both
integers.
## Main definitions
The Euclidean domain structure on `ℤ[i]` is defined in this file.
The homomorphism `GaussianInt.toComplex` into the complex numbers is also defined in this file.
## See also
See `NumberTheory.Zsqrtd.QuadraticReciprocity` for:
* `prime_iff_mod_four_eq_three_of_nat_prime`:
A prime natural number is prime in `ℤ[i]` if and only if it is `3` mod `4`
## Notations
This file uses the local notation `ℤ[i]` for `GaussianInt`
## Implementation notes
Gaussian integers are implemented using the more general definition `Zsqrtd`, the type of integers
adjoined a square root of `d`, in this case `-1`. The definition is reducible, so that properties
and definitions about `Zsqrtd` can easily be used.
-/
open Zsqrtd Complex
open scoped ComplexConjugate
/-- The Gaussian integers, defined as `ℤ√(-1)`. -/
abbrev GaussianInt : Type :=
Zsqrtd (-1)
#align gaussian_int GaussianInt
local notation "ℤ[i]" => GaussianInt
namespace GaussianInt
instance : Repr ℤ[i] :=
⟨fun x _ => "⟨" ++ repr x.re ++ ", " ++ repr x.im ++ "⟩"⟩
instance instCommRing : CommRing ℤ[i] :=
Zsqrtd.commRing
#align gaussian_int.comm_ring GaussianInt.instCommRing
section
attribute [-instance] Complex.instField -- Avoid making things noncomputable unnecessarily.
/-- The embedding of the Gaussian integers into the complex numbers, as a ring homomorphism. -/
def toComplex : ℤ[i] →+* ℂ :=
Zsqrtd.lift ⟨I, by simp⟩
#align gaussian_int.to_complex GaussianInt.toComplex
end
instance : Coe ℤ[i] ℂ :=
⟨toComplex⟩
theorem toComplex_def (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = x.re + x.im * I :=
rfl
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def GaussianInt.toComplex_def
theorem toComplex_def' (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y * I := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def' GaussianInt.toComplex_def'
theorem toComplex_def₂ (x : ℤ[i]) : (x : ℂ) = ⟨x.re, x.im⟩ := by
apply Complex.ext <;> simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_def₂ GaussianInt.toComplex_def₂
@[simp]
theorem to_real_re (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.re : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).re := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_real_re GaussianInt.to_real_re
@[simp]
theorem to_real_im (x : ℤ[i]) : ((x.im : ℤ) : ℝ) = (x : ℂ).im := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_real_im GaussianInt.to_real_im
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_re (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).re = x := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_re GaussianInt.toComplex_re
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_im (x y : ℤ) : ((⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ[i]) : ℂ).im = y := by simp [toComplex_def]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_im GaussianInt.toComplex_im
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_add (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x + y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x + y :=
toComplex.map_add _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_add GaussianInt.toComplex_add
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_mul (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x * y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x * y :=
toComplex.map_mul _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_mul GaussianInt.toComplex_mul
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_one : ((1 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 1 :=
toComplex.map_one
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_one GaussianInt.toComplex_one
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_zero : ((0 : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = 0 :=
toComplex.map_zero
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_zero GaussianInt.toComplex_zero
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_neg (x : ℤ[i]) : ((-x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = -x :=
toComplex.map_neg _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_neg GaussianInt.toComplex_neg
-- Porting note (#10618): @[simp] can prove this
theorem toComplex_sub (x y : ℤ[i]) : ((x - y : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = x - y :=
toComplex.map_sub _ _
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_sub GaussianInt.toComplex_sub
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_star (x : ℤ[i]) : ((star x : ℤ[i]) : ℂ) = conj (x : ℂ) := by
rw [toComplex_def₂, toComplex_def₂]
exact congr_arg₂ _ rfl (Int.cast_neg _)
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_star GaussianInt.toComplex_star
@[simp]
theorem toComplex_inj {x y : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = y ↔ x = y := by
cases x; cases y; simp [toComplex_def₂]
#align gaussian_int.to_complex_inj GaussianInt.toComplex_inj
lemma toComplex_injective : Function.Injective GaussianInt.toComplex :=
fun ⦃_ _⦄ ↦ toComplex_inj.mp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/GaussianInt.lean | 149 | 150 | theorem toComplex_eq_zero {x : ℤ[i]} : (x : ℂ) = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by |
rw [← toComplex_zero, toComplex_inj]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Taylor
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.RatFunc.AsPolynomial
#align_import field_theory.laurent from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Laurent expansions of rational functions
## Main declarations
* `RatFunc.laurent`: the Laurent expansion of the rational function `f` at `r`, as an `AlgHom`.
* `RatFunc.laurent_injective`: the Laurent expansion at `r` is unique
## Implementation details
Implemented as the quotient of two Taylor expansions, over domains.
An auxiliary definition is provided first to make the construction of the `AlgHom` easier,
which works on `CommRing` which are not necessarily domains.
-/
universe u
namespace RatFunc
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open scoped Classical nonZeroDivisors Polynomial
variable {R : Type u} [CommRing R] [hdomain : IsDomain R] (r s : R) (p q : R[X]) (f : RatFunc R)
theorem taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors (hp : p ∈ R[X]⁰) : taylor r p ∈ R[X]⁰ := by
rw [mem_nonZeroDivisors_iff]
intro x hx
have : x = taylor (r - r) x := by simp
rwa [this, sub_eq_add_neg, ← taylor_taylor, ← taylor_mul,
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (taylor_injective _), mul_right_mem_nonZeroDivisors_eq_zero_iff hp,
LinearMap.map_eq_zero_iff _ (taylor_injective _)] at hx
#align ratfunc.taylor_mem_non_zero_divisors RatFunc.taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors
/-- The Laurent expansion of rational functions about a value.
Auxiliary definition, usage when over integral domains should prefer `RatFunc.laurent`. -/
def laurentAux : RatFunc R →+* RatFunc R :=
RatFunc.mapRingHom
( { toFun := taylor r
map_add' := map_add (taylor r)
map_mul' := taylor_mul _
map_zero' := map_zero (taylor r)
map_one' := taylor_one r } : R[X] →+* R[X])
(taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors _)
#align ratfunc.laurent_aux RatFunc.laurentAux
theorem laurentAux_ofFractionRing_mk (q : R[X]⁰) :
laurentAux r (ofFractionRing (Localization.mk p q)) =
ofFractionRing (.mk (taylor r p) ⟨taylor r q, taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r q q.prop⟩) :=
map_apply_ofFractionRing_mk _ _ _ _
#align ratfunc.laurent_aux_of_fraction_ring_mk RatFunc.laurentAux_ofFractionRing_mk
theorem laurentAux_div :
laurentAux r (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) / algebraMap _ _ (taylor r q) :=
-- Porting note: added `by exact taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r`
map_apply_div _ (by exact taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors r) _ _
#align ratfunc.laurent_aux_div RatFunc.laurentAux_div
@[simp]
theorem laurentAux_algebraMap : laurentAux r (algebraMap _ _ p) = algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) := by
rw [← mk_one, ← mk_one, mk_eq_div, laurentAux_div, mk_eq_div, taylor_one, map_one, map_one]
#align ratfunc.laurent_aux_algebra_map RatFunc.laurentAux_algebraMap
/-- The Laurent expansion of rational functions about a value. -/
def laurent : RatFunc R →ₐ[R] RatFunc R :=
RatFunc.mapAlgHom (.ofLinearMap (taylor r) (taylor_one _) (taylor_mul _))
(taylor_mem_nonZeroDivisors _)
#align ratfunc.laurent RatFunc.laurent
theorem laurent_div :
laurent r (algebraMap _ _ p / algebraMap _ _ q) =
algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) / algebraMap _ _ (taylor r q) :=
laurentAux_div r p q
#align ratfunc.laurent_div RatFunc.laurent_div
@[simp]
theorem laurent_algebraMap : laurent r (algebraMap _ _ p) = algebraMap _ _ (taylor r p) :=
laurentAux_algebraMap _ _
#align ratfunc.laurent_algebra_map RatFunc.laurent_algebraMap
@[simp]
theorem laurent_X : laurent r X = X + C r := by
rw [← algebraMap_X, laurent_algebraMap, taylor_X, _root_.map_add, algebraMap_C]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align ratfunc.laurent_X RatFunc.laurent_X
@[simp]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/Laurent.lean | 102 | 103 | theorem laurent_C (x : R) : laurent r (C x) = C x := by |
rw [← algebraMap_C, laurent_algebraMap, taylor_C]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Comp
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Add
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Mul
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Slope
/-!
# Line derivatives
We define the line derivative of a function `f : E → F`, at a point `x : E` along a vector `v : E`,
as the element `f' : F` such that `f (x + t • v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` as `t` tends to `0` in
the scalar field `𝕜`, if it exists. It is denoted by `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`.
This notion is generally less well behaved than the full Fréchet derivative (for instance, the
composition of functions which are line-differentiable is not line-differentiable in general).
The Fréchet derivative should therefore be favored over this one in general, although the line
derivative may sometimes prove handy.
The line derivative in direction `v` is also called the Gateaux derivative in direction `v`,
although the term "Gateaux derivative" is sometimes reserved for the situation where there is
such a derivative in all directions, for the map `v ↦ lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v` (which doesn't have to be
linear in general).
## Main definition and results
We mimic the definitions and statements for the Fréchet derivative and the one-dimensional
derivative. We define in particular the following objects:
* `LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v`
* `HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`
* `HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v`
* `lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v`
and develop about them a basic API inspired by the one for the Fréchet derivative.
We depart from the Fréchet derivative in two places, as the dependence of the following predicates
on the direction would make them barely usable:
* We do not define an analogue of the predicate `UniqueDiffOn`;
* We do not define `LineDifferentiableOn` nor `LineDifferentiable`.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
section Module
/-!
Results that do not rely on a topological structure on `E`
-/
variable (𝕜)
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v` in the set `s`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivWithinAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivWithinAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` has the derivative `f'` at the point `x` along the direction `v`.
That is, `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
Note that this definition is less well behaved than the total Fréchet derivative, which
should generally be favored over this one. -/
def HasLineDerivAt (f : E → F) (f' : F) (x : E) (v : E) :=
HasDerivAt (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) f' (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` in the set `s` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def LineDifferentiableWithinAt (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- `f` is line-differentiable at the point `x` in the direction `v` if there
exists `f'` such that `f (x + t v) = f x + t • f' + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`. -/
def LineDifferentiableAt (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : Prop :=
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v` within the set `s`, if it exists.
Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0` and `x + t v ∈ s`.
-/
def lineDerivWithin (f : E → F) (s : Set E) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
derivWithin (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) ((fun t ↦ x + t • v) ⁻¹' s) (0 : 𝕜)
/-- Line derivative of `f` at the point `x` in the direction `v`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the line derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v`), then
`f (x + t v) = f x + t lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v + o (t)` when `t` tends to `0`.
-/
def lineDeriv (f : E → F) (x : E) (v : E) : F :=
deriv (fun t ↦ f (x + t • v)) (0 : 𝕜)
variable {𝕜}
variable {f f₁ : E → F} {f' f₀' f₁' : F} {s t : Set E} {x v : E}
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.mono (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) (hst : t ⊆ s) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' t x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.mono hf (preimage_mono hst)
lemma HasLineDerivAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) (s : Set E) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v :=
HasDerivAt.hasDerivWithinAt hf
lemma HasLineDerivWithinAt.lineDifferentiableWithinAt (hf : HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' s x v) :
LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v :=
HasDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt hf
theorem HasLineDerivAt.lineDifferentiableAt (hf : HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v) :
LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v :=
HasDerivAt.differentiableAt hf
theorem LineDifferentiableWithinAt.hasLineDerivWithinAt (h : LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f (lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v) s x v :=
DifferentiableWithinAt.hasDerivWithinAt h
theorem LineDifferentiableAt.hasLineDerivAt (h : LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f (lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v) x v :=
DifferentiableAt.hasDerivAt h
@[simp] lemma hasLineDerivWithinAt_univ :
HasLineDerivWithinAt 𝕜 f f' univ x v ↔ HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v := by
simp only [HasLineDerivWithinAt, HasLineDerivAt, preimage_univ, hasDerivWithinAt_univ]
theorem lineDerivWithin_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableWithinAt
(h : ¬LineDifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x v) :
lineDerivWithin 𝕜 f s x v = 0 :=
derivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h
theorem lineDeriv_zero_of_not_lineDifferentiableAt (h : ¬LineDifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x v) :
lineDeriv 𝕜 f x v = 0 :=
deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/LineDeriv/Basic.lean | 147 | 150 | theorem hasLineDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero :
HasLineDerivAt 𝕜 f f' x v ↔
(fun t : 𝕜 => f (x + t • v) - f x - t • f') =o[𝓝 0] fun t => t := by |
simp only [HasLineDerivAt, hasDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero, zero_add, zero_smul, add_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.NNReal
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.T5
#align_import topology.instances.ennreal from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ec4b2eeb50364487f80421c0b4c41328a611f30d"
/-!
# Topology on extended non-negative reals
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Metric Function
open scoped Classical Topology ENNReal NNReal Filter
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*}
namespace ENNReal
variable {a b c d : ℝ≥0∞} {r p q : ℝ≥0} {x y z : ℝ≥0∞} {ε ε₁ ε₂ : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set ℝ≥0∞}
section TopologicalSpace
open TopologicalSpace
/-- Topology on `ℝ≥0∞`.
Note: this is different from the `EMetricSpace` topology. The `EMetricSpace` topology has
`IsOpen {∞}`, while this topology doesn't have singleton elements. -/
instance : TopologicalSpace ℝ≥0∞ := Preorder.topology ℝ≥0∞
instance : OrderTopology ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨rfl⟩
-- short-circuit type class inference
instance : T2Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T5Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : T4Space ℝ≥0∞ := inferInstance
instance : SecondCountableTopology ℝ≥0∞ :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.secondCountableTopology
instance : MetrizableSpace ENNReal :=
orderIsoUnitIntervalBirational.toHomeomorph.embedding.metrizableSpace
theorem embedding_coe : Embedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
coe_strictMono.embedding_of_ordConnected <| by rw [range_coe']; exact ordConnected_Iio
#align ennreal.embedding_coe ENNReal.embedding_coe
theorem isOpen_ne_top : IsOpen { a : ℝ≥0∞ | a ≠ ∞ } := isOpen_ne
#align ennreal.is_open_ne_top ENNReal.isOpen_ne_top
theorem isOpen_Ico_zero : IsOpen (Ico 0 b) := by
rw [ENNReal.Ico_eq_Iio]
exact isOpen_Iio
#align ennreal.is_open_Ico_zero ENNReal.isOpen_Ico_zero
theorem openEmbedding_coe : OpenEmbedding ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
⟨embedding_coe, by rw [range_coe']; exact isOpen_Iio⟩
#align ennreal.open_embedding_coe ENNReal.openEmbedding_coe
theorem coe_range_mem_nhds : range ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) ∈ 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds openEmbedding_coe.isOpen_range <| mem_range_self _
#align ennreal.coe_range_mem_nhds ENNReal.coe_range_mem_nhds
@[norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0} {a : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun a => (m a : ℝ≥0∞)) f (𝓝 ↑a) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
embedding_coe.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe ENNReal.tendsto_coe
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ≥0∞) :=
embedding_coe.continuous
#align ennreal.continuous_coe ENNReal.continuous_coe
theorem continuous_coe_iff {α} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ≥0} :
(Continuous fun a => (f a : ℝ≥0∞)) ↔ Continuous f :=
embedding_coe.continuous_iff.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_coe_iff ENNReal.continuous_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe {r : ℝ≥0} : 𝓝 (r : ℝ≥0∞) = (𝓝 r).map (↑) :=
(openEmbedding_coe.map_nhds_eq r).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe
theorem tendsto_nhds_coe_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 ↑x) l ↔ Tendsto (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) (𝓝 x) l := by
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
theorem continuousAt_coe_iff {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {x : ℝ≥0} {f : ℝ≥0∞ → α} :
ContinuousAt f ↑x ↔ ContinuousAt (f ∘ (↑) : ℝ≥0 → α) x :=
tendsto_nhds_coe_iff
#align ennreal.continuous_at_coe_iff ENNReal.continuousAt_coe_iff
theorem nhds_coe_coe {r p : ℝ≥0} :
𝓝 ((r : ℝ≥0∞), (p : ℝ≥0∞)) = (𝓝 (r, p)).map fun p : ℝ≥0 × ℝ≥0 => (↑p.1, ↑p.2) :=
((openEmbedding_coe.prod openEmbedding_coe).map_nhds_eq (r, p)).symm
#align ennreal.nhds_coe_coe ENNReal.nhds_coe_coe
theorem continuous_ofReal : Continuous ENNReal.ofReal :=
(continuous_coe_iff.2 continuous_id).comp continuous_real_toNNReal
#align ennreal.continuous_of_real ENNReal.continuous_ofReal
theorem tendsto_ofReal {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ} {a : ℝ} (h : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto (fun a => ENNReal.ofReal (m a)) f (𝓝 (ENNReal.ofReal a)) :=
(continuous_ofReal.tendsto a).comp h
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal
theorem tendsto_toNNReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto ENNReal.toNNReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toNNReal) := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [nhds_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]
exact tendsto_id
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_toNNReal
theorem eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hfi : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ∞) (hgi : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ≠ ∞)
(hfg : (fun x => (f x).toReal) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x).toReal) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by
filter_upwards [hfi, hgi, hfg] with _ hfx hgx _
rwa [← ENNReal.toReal_eq_toReal hfx hgx]
#align ennreal.eventually_eq_of_to_real_eventually_eq ENNReal.eventuallyEq_of_toReal_eventuallyEq
theorem continuousOn_toNNReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toNNReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } := fun _a ha =>
ContinuousAt.continuousWithinAt (tendsto_toNNReal ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_on_to_nnreal ENNReal.continuousOn_toNNReal
theorem tendsto_toReal {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto ENNReal.toReal (𝓝 a) (𝓝 a.toReal) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.2 <| tendsto_toNNReal ha
#align ennreal.tendsto_to_real ENNReal.tendsto_toReal
lemma continuousOn_toReal : ContinuousOn ENNReal.toReal { a | a ≠ ∞ } :=
NNReal.continuous_coe.comp_continuousOn continuousOn_toNNReal
lemma continuousAt_toReal (hx : x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousAt ENNReal.toReal x :=
continuousOn_toReal.continuousAt (isOpen_ne_top.mem_nhds_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def neTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a ≠ ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 where
toEquiv := neTopEquivNNReal
continuous_toFun := continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 continuousOn_toNNReal
continuous_invFun := continuous_coe.subtype_mk _
#align ennreal.ne_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.neTopHomeomorphNNReal
/-- The set of finite `ℝ≥0∞` numbers is homeomorphic to `ℝ≥0`. -/
def ltTopHomeomorphNNReal : { a | a < ∞ } ≃ₜ ℝ≥0 := by
refine (Homeomorph.setCongr ?_).trans neTopHomeomorphNNReal
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
#align ennreal.lt_top_homeomorph_nnreal ENNReal.ltTopHomeomorphNNReal
theorem nhds_top : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ ∞), 𝓟 (Ioi a) :=
nhds_top_order.trans <| by simp [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ioi]
#align ennreal.nhds_top ENNReal.nhds_top
theorem nhds_top' : 𝓝 ∞ = ⨅ r : ℝ≥0, 𝓟 (Ioi ↑r) :=
nhds_top.trans <| iInf_ne_top _
#align ennreal.nhds_top' ENNReal.nhds_top'
theorem nhds_top_basis : (𝓝 ∞).HasBasis (fun a => a < ∞) fun a => Ioi a :=
_root_.nhds_top_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_top_basis ENNReal.nhds_top_basis
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ x : ℝ≥0, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑x < m a := by
simp only [nhds_top', tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal, mem_Ioi]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal
theorem tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.trans
⟨fun h n => by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_natCast] using h n, fun h x =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt x
(h n).mono fun y => lt_trans <| by rwa [← ENNReal.coe_natCast, coe_lt_coe]⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat
theorem tendsto_nhds_top {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ n : ℕ, ∀ᶠ a in f, ↑n < m a) :
Tendsto m f (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nat.2 h
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_nat_nhds_top : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ↑n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_nhds_top fun n =>
mem_atTop_sets.2 ⟨n + 1, fun _m hm => mem_setOf.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 <| Nat.lt_of_succ_le hm⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem tendsto_coe_nhds_top {f : α → ℝ≥0} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (fun x => (f x : ℝ≥0∞)) l (𝓝 ∞) ↔ Tendsto f l atTop := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal, atTop_basis_Ioi.tendsto_right_iff]; simp
#align ennreal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top
theorem tendsto_ofReal_atTop : Tendsto ENNReal.ofReal atTop (𝓝 ∞) :=
tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_real_toNNReal_atTop
#align ennreal.tendsto_of_real_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal_atTop
theorem nhds_zero : 𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞) = ⨅ (a) (_ : a ≠ 0), 𝓟 (Iio a) :=
nhds_bot_order.trans <| by simp [pos_iff_ne_zero, Iio]
#align ennreal.nhds_zero ENNReal.nhds_zero
theorem nhds_zero_basis : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) fun a => Iio a :=
nhds_bot_basis
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis
theorem nhds_zero_basis_Iic : (𝓝 (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).HasBasis (fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => 0 < a) Iic :=
nhds_bot_basis_Iic
#align ennreal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic ENNReal.nhds_zero_basis_Iic
-- Porting note (#11215): TODO: add a TC for `≠ ∞`?
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot {r : ℝ≥0} : (𝓝[>] (r : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_self_neBot' ⟨∞, ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_coe_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot : (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
#align ennreal.nhds_within_Ioi_zero_ne_bot ENNReal.nhdsWithin_Ioi_zero_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_one_neBot : (𝓝[>] (1 : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_nat_neBot (n : ℕ) : (𝓝[>] (n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioi_ofNat_nebot (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(𝓝[>] (OfNat.ofNat n : ℝ≥0∞)).NeBot := nhdsWithin_Ioi_coe_neBot
@[instance]
theorem nhdsWithin_Iio_neBot [NeZero x] : (𝓝[<] x).NeBot :=
nhdsWithin_Iio_self_neBot' ⟨0, NeZero.pos x⟩
/-- Closed intervals `Set.Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)`, `ε ≠ 0`, form a basis of neighborhoods of an
extended nonnegative real number `x ≠ ∞`. We use `Set.Icc` instead of `Set.Ioo` because this way the
statement works for `x = 0`.
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (· ≠ 0) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
rcases (zero_le x).eq_or_gt with rfl | x0
· simp_rw [zero_tsub, zero_add, ← bot_eq_zero, Icc_bot, ← bot_lt_iff_ne_bot]
exact nhds_bot_basis_Iic
· refine (nhds_basis_Ioo' ⟨_, x0⟩ ⟨_, xt.lt_top⟩).to_hasBasis ?_ fun ε ε0 => ?_
· rintro ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩
rcases exists_between (tsub_pos_of_lt ha) with ⟨ε, ε0, hε⟩
rcases lt_iff_exists_add_pos_lt.1 hb with ⟨δ, δ0, hδ⟩
refine ⟨min ε δ, (lt_min ε0 (coe_pos.2 δ0)).ne', Icc_subset_Ioo ?_ ?_⟩
· exact lt_tsub_comm.2 ((min_le_left _ _).trans_lt hε)
· exact (add_le_add_left (min_le_right _ _) _).trans_lt hδ
· exact ⟨(x - ε, x + ε), ⟨ENNReal.sub_lt_self xt x0.ne' ε0,
lt_add_right xt ε0⟩, Ioo_subset_Icc_self⟩
theorem hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (0 < ·) (fun ε => Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) := by
simpa only [pos_iff_ne_zero] using hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt
theorem Icc_mem_nhds (xt : x ≠ ∞) (ε0 : ε ≠ 0) : Icc (x - ε) (x + ε) ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top' xt).mem_of_mem ε0
#align ennreal.Icc_mem_nhds ENNReal.Icc_mem_nhds
theorem nhds_of_ne_top (xt : x ≠ ∞) : 𝓝 x = ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) :=
(hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top xt).eq_biInf
#align ennreal.nhds_of_ne_top ENNReal.nhds_of_ne_top
theorem biInf_le_nhds : ∀ x : ℝ≥0∞, ⨅ ε > 0, 𝓟 (Icc (x - ε) (x + ε)) ≤ 𝓝 x
| ∞ => iInf₂_le_of_le 1 one_pos <| by
simpa only [← coe_one, top_sub_coe, top_add, Icc_self, principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds _
| (x : ℝ≥0) => (nhds_of_ne_top coe_ne_top).ge
-- Porting note (#10756): new lemma
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_of_Icc {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε)) : Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) := by
refine Tendsto.mono_right ?_ (biInf_le_nhds _)
simpa only [tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
/-- Characterization of neighborhoods for `ℝ≥0∞` numbers. See also `tendsto_order`
for a version with strict inequalities. -/
protected theorem tendsto_nhds {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) := by
simp only [nhds_of_ne_top ha, tendsto_iInf, tendsto_principal]
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds ENNReal.tendsto_nhds
protected theorem tendsto_nhds_zero {f : Filter α} {u : α → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in f, u x ≤ ε :=
nhds_zero_basis_Iic.tendsto_right_iff
#align ennreal.tendsto_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero
protected theorem tendsto_atTop [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(ha : a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ∈ Icc (a - ε) (a + ε) :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff (hasBasis_nhds_of_ne_top ha)) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top ENNReal.tendsto_atTop
instance : ContinuousAdd ℝ≥0∞ := by
refine ⟨continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 ?_⟩
rintro ⟨_ | a, b⟩
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_fst fun p => le_add_right le_rfl
rcases b with (_ | b)
· exact tendsto_nhds_top_mono' continuousAt_snd fun p => le_add_left le_rfl
simp only [ContinuousAt, some_eq_coe, nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_add, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·),
tendsto_coe, tendsto_add]
protected theorem tendsto_atTop_zero [Nonempty β] [SemilatticeSup β] {f : β → ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ n ≥ N, f n ≤ ε :=
.trans (atTop_basis.tendsto_iff nhds_zero_basis_Iic) (by simp only [true_and]; rfl)
#align ennreal.tendsto_at_top_zero ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero
theorem tendsto_sub : ∀ {a b : ℝ≥0∞}, (a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a - b))
| ∞, ∞, h => by simp only [ne_eq, not_true_eq_false, or_self] at h
| ∞, (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
rw [top_sub_coe, tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal]
refine fun x => ((lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (b + 1 + x)).prod_nhds
(ge_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one b)).mono fun y hy => ?_
rw [lt_tsub_iff_left]
calc y.2 + x ≤ ↑(b + 1) + x := add_le_add_right hy.2 _
_ < y.1 := hy.1
| (a : ℝ≥0), ∞, _ => by
rw [sub_top]
refine (tendsto_pure.2 ?_).mono_right (pure_le_nhds _)
exact ((gt_mem_nhds <| coe_lt_coe.2 <| lt_add_one a).prod_nhds
(lt_mem_nhds <| @coe_lt_top (a + 1))).mono fun x hx =>
tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.2 (hx.1.trans hx.2).le
| (a : ℝ≥0), (b : ℝ≥0), _ => by
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, ← ENNReal.coe_sub, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_coe]
exact continuous_sub.tendsto (a, b)
#align ennreal.tendsto_sub ENNReal.tendsto_sub
protected theorem Tendsto.sub {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b)) (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun a => ma a - mb a) f (𝓝 (a - b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 - p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a - b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_sub h) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.sub ENNReal.Tendsto.sub
protected theorem tendsto_mul (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (a, b)) (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
have ht : ∀ b : ℝ≥0∞, b ≠ 0 →
Tendsto (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) (𝓝 (∞, b)) (𝓝 ∞) := fun b hb => by
refine tendsto_nhds_top_iff_nnreal.2 fun n => ?_
rcases lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hb) with ⟨ε, hε, hεb⟩
have : ∀ᶠ c : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ in 𝓝 (∞, b), ↑n / ↑ε < c.1 ∧ ↑ε < c.2 :=
(lt_mem_nhds <| div_lt_top coe_ne_top hε.ne').prod_nhds (lt_mem_nhds hεb)
refine this.mono fun c hc => ?_
exact (ENNReal.div_mul_cancel hε.ne' coe_ne_top).symm.trans_lt (mul_lt_mul hc.1 hc.2)
induction a with
| top => simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at hb; simp [ht b hb, top_mul hb]
| coe a =>
induction b with
| top =>
simp only [ne_eq, or_false, not_true_eq_false] at ha
simpa [(· ∘ ·), mul_comm, mul_top ha]
using (ht a ha).comp (continuous_swap.tendsto (ofNNReal a, ∞))
| coe b =>
simp only [nhds_coe_coe, ← coe_mul, tendsto_coe, tendsto_map'_iff, (· ∘ ·), tendsto_mul]
#align ennreal.tendsto_mul ENNReal.tendsto_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a * mb a) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
show Tendsto ((fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.1 * p.2) ∘ fun a => (ma a, mb a)) f (𝓝 (a * b)) from
Tendsto.comp (ENNReal.tendsto_mul ha hb) (hma.prod_mk_nhds hmb)
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul ENNReal.Tendsto.mul
theorem _root_.ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞)
(h₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) : ContinuousOn (fun x => f x * g x) s := fun x hx =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (hf x hx) (h₁ x hx) (hg x hx) (h₂ x hx)
#align continuous_on.ennreal_mul ContinuousOn.ennreal_mul
theorem _root_.Continuous.ennreal_mul [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) (h₁ : ∀ x, f x ≠ 0 ∨ g x ≠ ∞) (h₂ : ∀ x, g x ≠ 0 ∨ f x ≠ ∞) :
Continuous fun x => f x * g x :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun x =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul hf.continuousAt (h₁ x) hg.continuousAt (h₂ x)
#align continuous.ennreal_mul Continuous.ennreal_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.const_mul {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ 0 ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a * m b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) :=
by_cases (fun (this : a = 0) => by simp [this, tendsto_const_nhds]) fun ha : a ≠ 0 =>
ENNReal.Tendsto.mul tendsto_const_nhds (Or.inl ha) hm hb
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_mul ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul
protected theorem Tendsto.mul_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun x => m x * b) f (𝓝 (a * b)) := by
simpa only [mul_comm] using ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul hm ha
#align ennreal.tendsto.mul_const ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const
theorem tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} {x : Filter α} {a : ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(s : Finset ι) (h : ∀ i ∈ s, Tendsto (f i) x (𝓝 (a i))) (h' : ∀ i ∈ s, a i ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun b => ∏ c ∈ s, f c b) x (𝓝 (∏ c ∈ s, a c)) := by
induction' s using Finset.induction with a s has IH
· simp [tendsto_const_nhds]
simp only [Finset.prod_insert has]
apply Tendsto.mul (h _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
· right
exact (prod_lt_top fun i hi => h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)).ne
· exact IH (fun i hi => h _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)) fun i hi =>
h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
· exact Or.inr (h' _ (Finset.mem_insert_self _ _))
#align ennreal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top ENNReal.tendsto_finset_prod_of_ne_top
protected theorem continuousAt_const_mul {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (a * ·) b :=
Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_const_mul ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul
protected theorem continuousAt_mul_const {a b : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a ≠ ∞ ∨ b ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun x => x * a) b :=
Tendsto.mul_const tendsto_id h.symm
#align ennreal.continuous_at_mul_const ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_const_mul {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a * ·) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_const_mul ENNReal.continuous_const_mul
protected theorem continuous_mul_const {a : ℝ≥0∞} (ha : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous fun x => x * a :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.2 fun _ => ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inl ha)
#align ennreal.continuous_mul_const ENNReal.continuous_mul_const
protected theorem continuous_div_const (c : ℝ≥0∞) (c_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) :
Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x / c := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
exact ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.intro_left _ (inv_ne_top.mpr c_ne_zero))
#align ennreal.continuous_div_const ENNReal.continuous_div_const
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_pow (n : ℕ) : Continuous fun a : ℝ≥0∞ => a ^ n := by
induction' n with n IH
· simp [continuous_const]
simp_rw [pow_add, pow_one, continuous_iff_continuousAt]
intro x
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul (IH.tendsto _) ?_ tendsto_id ?_ <;> by_cases H : x = 0
· simp only [H, zero_ne_top, Ne, or_true_iff, not_false_iff]
· exact Or.inl fun h => H (pow_eq_zero h)
· simp only [H, pow_eq_top_iff, zero_ne_top, false_or_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
not_false_iff, false_and_iff]
· simp only [H, true_or_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_pow ENNReal.continuous_pow
theorem continuousOn_sub :
ContinuousOn (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) { p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ | p ≠ ⟨∞, ∞⟩ } := by
rw [ContinuousOn]
rintro ⟨x, y⟩ hp
simp only [Ne, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff] at hp
exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (tendsto_sub (not_and_or.mp hp))
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub ENNReal.continuousOn_sub
theorem continuous_sub_left {a : ℝ≥0∞} (a_ne_top : a ≠ ∞) : Continuous (a - ·) := by
change Continuous (Function.uncurry Sub.sub ∘ (a, ·))
refine continuousOn_sub.comp_continuous (Continuous.Prod.mk a) fun x => ?_
simp only [a_ne_top, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, false_and_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_left ENNReal.continuous_sub_left
theorem continuous_nnreal_sub {a : ℝ≥0} : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => (a : ℝ≥0∞) - x :=
continuous_sub_left coe_ne_top
#align ennreal.continuous_nnreal_sub ENNReal.continuous_nnreal_sub
theorem continuousOn_sub_left (a : ℝ≥0∞) : ContinuousOn (a - ·) { x : ℝ≥0∞ | x ≠ ∞ } := by
rw [show (fun x => a - x) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨a, x⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp continuousOn_sub (Continuous.continuousOn (Continuous.Prod.mk a))
rintro _ h (_ | _)
exact h none_eq_top
#align ennreal.continuous_on_sub_left ENNReal.continuousOn_sub_left
theorem continuous_sub_right (a : ℝ≥0∞) : Continuous fun x : ℝ≥0∞ => x - a := by
by_cases a_infty : a = ∞
· simp [a_infty, continuous_const]
· rw [show (fun x => x - a) = (fun p : ℝ≥0∞ × ℝ≥0∞ => p.fst - p.snd) ∘ fun x => ⟨x, a⟩ by rfl]
apply ContinuousOn.comp_continuous continuousOn_sub (continuous_id'.prod_mk continuous_const)
intro x
simp only [a_infty, Ne, mem_setOf_eq, Prod.mk.inj_iff, and_false_iff, not_false_iff]
#align ennreal.continuous_sub_right ENNReal.continuous_sub_right
protected theorem Tendsto.pow {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} {n : ℕ}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) : Tendsto (fun x => m x ^ n) f (𝓝 (a ^ n)) :=
((continuous_pow n).tendsto a).comp hm
#align ennreal.tendsto.pow ENNReal.Tendsto.pow
theorem le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ a < 1, a * x ≤ y) : x ≤ y := by
have : Tendsto (· * x) (𝓝[<] 1) (𝓝 (1 * x)) :=
(ENNReal.continuousAt_mul_const (Or.inr one_ne_zero)).mono_left inf_le_left
rw [one_mul] at this
exact le_of_tendsto this (eventually_nhdsWithin_iff.2 <| eventually_of_forall h)
#align ennreal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le ENNReal.le_of_forall_lt_one_mul_le
theorem iInf_mul_left' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i := by
by_cases H : a = ∞ ∧ ⨅ i, f i = 0
· rcases h H.1 H.2 with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [H.2, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero, iInf_eq_bot]
exact fun b hb => ⟨i, by rwa [hi, mul_zero, ← bot_eq_zero]⟩
· rw [not_and_or] at H
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· rw [iInf_of_empty, iInf_of_empty, mul_top]
exact mt h0 (not_nonempty_iff.2 ‹_›)
· exact (ENNReal.mul_left_mono.map_iInf_of_continuousAt'
(ENNReal.continuousAt_const_mul H)).symm
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left' ENNReal.iInf_mul_left'
theorem iInf_mul_left {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, a * f i = a * ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_mul_left' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_left ENNReal.iInf_mul_left
theorem iInf_mul_right' {ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0)
(h0 : a = 0 → Nonempty ι) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a := by
simpa only [mul_comm a] using iInf_mul_left' h h0
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right' ENNReal.iInf_mul_right'
theorem iInf_mul_right {ι} [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : a = ∞ → ⨅ i, f i = 0 → ∃ i, f i = 0) : ⨅ i, f i * a = (⨅ i, f i) * a :=
iInf_mul_right' h fun _ => ‹Nonempty ι›
#align ennreal.infi_mul_right ENNReal.iInf_mul_right
theorem inv_map_iInf {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iInf x)⁻¹ = ⨆ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iInf x
#align ennreal.inv_map_infi ENNReal.inv_map_iInf
theorem inv_map_iSup {ι : Sort*} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} : (iSup x)⁻¹ = ⨅ i, (x i)⁻¹ :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.map_iSup x
#align ennreal.inv_map_supr ENNReal.inv_map_iSup
theorem inv_limsup {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(limsup x l)⁻¹ = liminf (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.limsup_apply
#align ennreal.inv_limsup ENNReal.inv_limsup
theorem inv_liminf {ι : Sort _} {x : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {l : Filter ι} :
(liminf x l)⁻¹ = limsup (fun i => (x i)⁻¹) l :=
OrderIso.invENNReal.liminf_apply
#align ennreal.inv_liminf ENNReal.inv_liminf
instance : ContinuousInv ℝ≥0∞ := ⟨OrderIso.invENNReal.continuous⟩
@[simp] -- Porting note (#11215): TODO: generalize to `[InvolutiveInv _] [ContinuousInv _]`
protected theorem tendsto_inv_iff {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun x => (m x)⁻¹) f (𝓝 a⁻¹) ↔ Tendsto m f (𝓝 a) :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_inv] using Tendsto.inv h, Tendsto.inv⟩
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_iff ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff
protected theorem Tendsto.div {f : Filter α} {ma : α → ℝ≥0∞} {mb : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hma : Tendsto ma f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) (hmb : Tendsto mb f (𝓝 b))
(hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun a => ma a / mb a) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul hma _ (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hmb) _ <;> simp [ha, hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div ENNReal.Tendsto.div
protected theorem Tendsto.const_div {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 b)) (hb : b ≠ ∞ ∨ a ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (fun b => a / m b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.const_mul (ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 hm)
simp [hb]
#align ennreal.tendsto.const_div ENNReal.Tendsto.const_div
protected theorem Tendsto.div_const {f : Filter α} {m : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a b : ℝ≥0∞}
(hm : Tendsto m f (𝓝 a)) (ha : a ≠ 0 ∨ b ≠ 0) : Tendsto (fun x => m x / b) f (𝓝 (a / b)) := by
apply Tendsto.mul_const hm
simp [ha]
#align ennreal.tendsto.div_const ENNReal.Tendsto.div_const
protected theorem tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => (n : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
ENNReal.inv_top ▸ ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 tendsto_nat_nhds_top
#align ennreal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero ENNReal.tendsto_inv_nat_nhds_zero
theorem iSup_add {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : iSup s + a = ⨆ b, s b + a :=
Monotone.map_iSup_of_continuousAt' (continuousAt_id.add continuousAt_const) <|
monotone_id.add monotone_const
#align ennreal.supr_add ENNReal.iSup_add
theorem biSup_add' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + a = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i + a := by
haveI : Nonempty { i // p i } := nonempty_subtype.2 h
simp only [iSup_subtype', iSup_add]
#align ennreal.bsupr_add' ENNReal.biSup_add'
theorem add_biSup' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} (h : ∃ i, p i) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ⨆ (i) (_ : p i), a + f i := by
simp only [add_comm a, biSup_add' h]
#align ennreal.add_bsupr' ENNReal.add_biSup'
theorem biSup_add {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + a = ⨆ i ∈ s, f i + a :=
biSup_add' hs
#align ennreal.bsupr_add ENNReal.biSup_add
theorem add_biSup {ι} {s : Set ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} :
(a + ⨆ i ∈ s, f i) = ⨆ i ∈ s, a + f i :=
add_biSup' hs
#align ennreal.add_bsupr ENNReal.add_biSup
theorem sSup_add {s : Set ℝ≥0∞} (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s + a = ⨆ b ∈ s, b + a := by
rw [sSup_eq_iSup, biSup_add hs]
#align ennreal.Sup_add ENNReal.sSup_add
theorem add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {s : ι → ℝ≥0∞} [Nonempty ι] : a + iSup s = ⨆ b, a + s b := by
rw [add_comm, iSup_add]; simp [add_comm]
#align ennreal.add_supr ENNReal.add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_le {ι ι' : Sort*} [Nonempty ι] [Nonempty ι'] {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞}
{a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, f i + g j ≤ a) : iSup f + iSup g ≤ a := by
simp_rw [iSup_add, add_iSup]; exact iSup₂_le h
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_le ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_le
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le' {ι ι'} {p : ι → Prop} {q : ι' → Prop} (hp : ∃ i, p i) (hq : ∃ j, q j)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i, p i → ∀ j, q j → f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ (i) (_ : p i), f i) + ⨆ (j) (_ : q j), g j) ≤ a := by
simp_rw [biSup_add' hp, add_biSup' hq]
exact iSup₂_le fun i hi => iSup₂_le (h i hi)
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le' ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le'
theorem biSup_add_biSup_le {ι ι'} {s : Set ι} {t : Set ι'} (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty)
{f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {g : ι' → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ t, f i + g j ≤ a) :
((⨆ i ∈ s, f i) + ⨆ j ∈ t, g j) ≤ a :=
biSup_add_biSup_le' hs ht h
#align ennreal.bsupr_add_bsupr_le ENNReal.biSup_add_biSup_le
theorem iSup_add_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (h : ∀ i j, ∃ k, f i + g j ≤ f k + g k) :
iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· simp only [iSup_of_empty, bot_eq_zero, zero_add]
· refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun a => add_le_add (le_iSup _ _) (le_iSup _ _))
refine iSup_add_iSup_le fun i j => ?_
rcases h i j with ⟨k, hk⟩
exact le_iSup_of_le k hk
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup
theorem iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone {ι : Type*} [SemilatticeSup ι] {f g : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Monotone f)
(hg : Monotone g) : iSup f + iSup g = ⨆ a, f a + g a :=
iSup_add_iSup fun i j => ⟨i ⊔ j, add_le_add (hf <| le_sup_left) (hg <| le_sup_right)⟩
#align ennreal.supr_add_supr_of_monotone ENNReal.iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone
theorem finset_sum_iSup_nat {α} {ι} [SemilatticeSup ι] {s : Finset α} {f : α → ι → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : ∀ a, Monotone (f a)) : (∑ a ∈ s, iSup (f a)) = ⨆ n, ∑ a ∈ s, f a n := by
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· simp
· intro a s has ih
simp only [Finset.sum_insert has]
rw [ih, iSup_add_iSup_of_monotone (hf a)]
intro i j h
exact Finset.sum_le_sum fun a _ => hf a h
#align ennreal.finset_sum_supr_nat ENNReal.finset_sum_iSup_nat
| Mathlib/Topology/Instances/ENNReal.lean | 647 | 653 | theorem mul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} {a : ℝ≥0∞} : a * iSup f = ⨆ i, a * f i := by |
by_cases hf : ∀ i, f i = 0
· obtain rfl : f = fun _ => 0 := funext hf
simp only [iSup_zero_eq_zero, mul_zero]
· refine (monotone_id.const_mul' _).map_iSup_of_continuousAt ?_ (mul_zero a)
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.const_mul tendsto_id (Or.inl ?_)
exact mt iSup_eq_zero.1 hf
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Scott Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Morrison, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Unitization
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.StarSubalgebra
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.ContinuousMapZero
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousFunction.Weierstrass
#align_import topology.continuous_function.stone_weierstrass from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"16e59248c0ebafabd5d071b1cd41743eb8698ffb"
/-!
# The Stone-Weierstrass theorem
If a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
separates points, then it is dense.
We argue as follows.
* In any subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, if `f ∈ A`, then `abs f ∈ A.topologicalClosure`.
This follows from the Weierstrass approximation theorem on `[-‖f‖, ‖f‖]` by
approximating `abs` uniformly thereon by polynomials.
* This ensures that `A.topologicalClosure` is actually a sublattice:
if it contains `f` and `g`, then it contains the pointwise supremum `f ⊔ g`
and the pointwise infimum `f ⊓ g`.
* Any nonempty sublattice `L` of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points is dense,
by a nice argument approximating a given `f` above and below using separating functions.
For each `x y : X`, we pick a function `g x y ∈ L` so `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`.
By continuity these functions remain close to `f` on small patches around `x` and `y`.
We use compactness to identify a certain finitely indexed infimum of finitely indexed supremums
which is then close to `f` everywhere, obtaining the desired approximation.
* Finally we put these pieces together. `L = A.topologicalClosure` is a nonempty sublattice
which separates points since `A` does, and so is dense (in fact equal to `⊤`).
We then prove the complex version for star subalgebras `A`, by separately approximating
the real and imaginary parts using the real subalgebra of real-valued functions in `A`
(which still separates points, by taking the norm-square of a separating function).
## Future work
Extend to cover the case of subalgebras of the continuous functions vanishing at infinity,
on non-compact spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
namespace ContinuousMap
variable {X : Type*} [TopologicalSpace X] [CompactSpace X]
open scoped Polynomial
/-- Turn a function `f : C(X, ℝ)` into a continuous map into `Set.Icc (-‖f‖) (‖f‖)`,
thereby explicitly attaching bounds.
-/
def attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ)) : C(X, Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖) where
toFun x := ⟨f x, ⟨neg_norm_le_apply f x, apply_le_norm f x⟩⟩
#align continuous_map.attach_bound ContinuousMap.attachBound
@[simp]
theorem attachBound_apply_coe (f : C(X, ℝ)) (x : X) : ((attachBound f) x : ℝ) = f x :=
rfl
#align continuous_map.attach_bound_apply_coe ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe
theorem polynomial_comp_attachBound (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : ℝ[X]) :
(g.toContinuousMapOn (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attachBound =
Polynomial.aeval f g := by
ext
simp only [ContinuousMap.coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe,
Polynomial.toContinuousMapOn_apply, Polynomial.aeval_subalgebra_coe,
Polynomial.aeval_continuousMap_apply, Polynomial.toContinuousMap_apply]
-- This used to be `rw`, but we need `erw` after leanprover/lean4#2644
erw [ContinuousMap.attachBound_apply_coe]
#align continuous_map.polynomial_comp_attach_bound ContinuousMap.polynomial_comp_attachBound
/-- Given a continuous function `f` in a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)`, postcomposing by a polynomial
gives another function in `A`.
This lemma proves something slightly more subtle than this:
we take `f`, and think of it as a function into the restricted target `Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)`,
and then postcompose with a polynomial function on that interval.
This is in fact the same situation as above, and so also gives a function in `A`.
-/
theorem polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) (g : ℝ[X]) :
(g.toContinuousMapOn (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).comp (f : C(X, ℝ)).attachBound ∈ A := by
rw [polynomial_comp_attachBound]
apply SetLike.coe_mem
#align continuous_map.polynomial_comp_attach_bound_mem ContinuousMap.polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem
theorem comp_attachBound_mem_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A)
(p : C(Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖, ℝ)) : p.comp (attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ))) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
-- `p` itself is in the closure of polynomials, by the Weierstrass theorem,
have mem_closure : p ∈ (polynomialFunctions (Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖)).topologicalClosure :=
continuousMap_mem_polynomialFunctions_closure _ _ p
-- and so there are polynomials arbitrarily close.
have frequently_mem_polynomials := mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp mem_closure
-- To prove `p.comp (attachBound f)` is in the closure of `A`,
-- we show there are elements of `A` arbitrarily close.
apply mem_closure_iff_frequently.mpr
-- To show that, we pull back the polynomials close to `p`,
refine
((compRightContinuousMap ℝ (attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ)))).continuousAt
p).tendsto.frequently_map
_ ?_ frequently_mem_polynomials
-- but need to show that those pullbacks are actually in `A`.
rintro _ ⟨g, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
simp only [SetLike.mem_coe, AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, compRightContinuousMap_apply,
Polynomial.toContinuousMapOnAlgHom_apply]
apply polynomial_comp_attachBound_mem
#align continuous_map.comp_attach_bound_mem_closure ContinuousMap.comp_attachBound_mem_closure
theorem abs_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f : A) :
|(f : C(X, ℝ))| ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
let f' := attachBound (f : C(X, ℝ))
let abs : C(Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖, ℝ) := { toFun := fun x : Set.Icc (-‖f‖) ‖f‖ => |(x : ℝ)| }
change abs.comp f' ∈ A.topologicalClosure
apply comp_attachBound_mem_closure
#align continuous_map.abs_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.abs_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem inf_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [inf_eq_half_smul_add_sub_abs_sub' ℝ]
refine
A.topologicalClosure.smul_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.sub_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem (A.le_topologicalClosure f.property)
(A.le_topologicalClosure g.property))
?_)
_
exact mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _
#align continuous_map.inf_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.inf_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem inf_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : IsClosed (A : Set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊓ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A := by
convert inf_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g
apply SetLike.ext'
symm
erw [closure_eq_iff_isClosed]
exact h
#align continuous_map.inf_mem_closed_subalgebra ContinuousMap.inf_mem_closed_subalgebra
theorem sup_mem_subalgebra_closure (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (f g : A) :
(f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [sup_eq_half_smul_add_add_abs_sub' ℝ]
refine
A.topologicalClosure.smul_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem
(A.topologicalClosure.add_mem (A.le_topologicalClosure f.property)
(A.le_topologicalClosure g.property))
?_)
_
exact mod_cast abs_mem_subalgebra_closure A _
#align continuous_map.sup_mem_subalgebra_closure ContinuousMap.sup_mem_subalgebra_closure
theorem sup_mem_closed_subalgebra (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ)) (h : IsClosed (A : Set C(X, ℝ)))
(f g : A) : (f : C(X, ℝ)) ⊔ (g : C(X, ℝ)) ∈ A := by
convert sup_mem_subalgebra_closure A f g
apply SetLike.ext'
symm
erw [closure_eq_iff_isClosed]
exact h
#align continuous_map.sup_mem_closed_subalgebra ContinuousMap.sup_mem_closed_subalgebra
open scoped Topology
-- Here's the fun part of Stone-Weierstrass!
theorem sublattice_closure_eq_top (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) (nA : L.Nonempty)
(inf_mem : ∀ᵉ (f ∈ L) (g ∈ L), f ⊓ g ∈ L)
(sup_mem : ∀ᵉ (f ∈ L) (g ∈ L), f ⊔ g ∈ L) (sep : L.SeparatesPointsStrongly) :
closure L = ⊤ := by
-- We start by boiling down to a statement about close approximation.
rw [eq_top_iff]
rintro f -
refine
Filter.Frequently.mem_closure
((Filter.HasBasis.frequently_iff Metric.nhds_basis_ball).mpr fun ε pos => ?_)
simp only [exists_prop, Metric.mem_ball]
-- It will be helpful to assume `X` is nonempty later,
-- so we get that out of the way here.
by_cases nX : Nonempty X
swap
· exact ⟨nA.some, (dist_lt_iff pos).mpr fun x => False.elim (nX ⟨x⟩), nA.choose_spec⟩
/-
The strategy now is to pick a family of continuous functions `g x y` in `A`
with the property that `g x y x = f x` and `g x y y = f y`
(this is immediate from `h : SeparatesPointsStrongly`)
then use continuity to see that `g x y` is close to `f` near both `x` and `y`,
and finally using compactness to produce the desired function `h`
as a maximum over finitely many `x` of a minimum over finitely many `y` of the `g x y`.
-/
dsimp only [Set.SeparatesPointsStrongly] at sep
choose g hg w₁ w₂ using sep f
-- For each `x y`, we define `U x y` to be `{z | f z - ε < g x y z}`,
-- and observe this is a neighbourhood of `y`.
let U : X → X → Set X := fun x y => {z | f z - ε < g x y z}
have U_nhd_y : ∀ x y, U x y ∈ 𝓝 y := by
intro x y
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ ?_
· apply isOpen_lt <;> continuity
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, w₂]
exact sub_lt_self _ pos
-- Fixing `x` for a moment, we have a family of functions `fun y ↦ g x y`
-- which on different patches (the `U x y`) are greater than `f z - ε`.
-- Taking the supremum of these functions
-- indexed by a finite collection of patches which cover `X`
-- will give us an element of `A` that is globally greater than `f z - ε`
-- and still equal to `f x` at `x`.
-- Since `X` is compact, for every `x` there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `U x y` for `y ∈ ys x` still covers everything.
let ys : X → Finset X := fun x => (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).choose
let ys_w : ∀ x, ⋃ y ∈ ys x, U x y = ⊤ := fun x =>
(CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover (U x) (U_nhd_y x)).choose_spec
have ys_nonempty : ∀ x, (ys x).Nonempty := fun x =>
Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX (ys_w x)
-- Thus for each `x` we have the desired `h x : A` so `f z - ε < h x z` everywhere
-- and `h x x = f x`.
let h : X → L := fun x =>
⟨(ys x).sup' (ys_nonempty x) fun y => (g x y : C(X, ℝ)),
Finset.sup'_mem _ sup_mem _ _ _ fun y _ => hg x y⟩
have lt_h : ∀ x z, f z - ε < (h x : X → ℝ) z := by
intro x z
obtain ⟨y, ym, zm⟩ := Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ (ys_w x) z
dsimp
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, coe_sup', Finset.sup'_apply, Finset.lt_sup'_iff]
exact ⟨y, ym, zm⟩
have h_eq : ∀ x, (h x : X → ℝ) x = f x := by intro x; simp [w₁]
-- For each `x`, we define `W x` to be `{z | h x z < f z + ε}`,
let W : X → Set X := fun x => {z | (h x : X → ℝ) z < f z + ε}
-- This is still a neighbourhood of `x`.
have W_nhd : ∀ x, W x ∈ 𝓝 x := by
intro x
refine IsOpen.mem_nhds ?_ ?_
· -- Porting note: mathlib3 `continuity` found `continuous_set_coe`
apply isOpen_lt (continuous_set_coe _ _)
continuity
· dsimp only [W, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [h_eq]
exact lt_add_of_pos_right _ pos
-- Since `X` is compact, there is some finset `ys t`
-- so the union of the `W x` for `x ∈ xs` still covers everything.
let xs : Finset X := (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).choose
let xs_w : ⋃ x ∈ xs, W x = ⊤ := (CompactSpace.elim_nhds_subcover W W_nhd).choose_spec
have xs_nonempty : xs.Nonempty := Set.nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty _ _ nX xs_w
-- Finally our candidate function is the infimum over `x ∈ xs` of the `h x`.
-- This function is then globally less than `f z + ε`.
let k : (L : Type _) :=
⟨xs.inf' xs_nonempty fun x => (h x : C(X, ℝ)),
Finset.inf'_mem _ inf_mem _ _ _ fun x _ => (h x).2⟩
refine ⟨k.1, ?_, k.2⟩
-- We just need to verify the bound, which we do pointwise.
rw [dist_lt_iff pos]
intro z
-- We rewrite into this particular form,
-- so that simp lemmas about inequalities involving `Finset.inf'` can fire.
rw [show ∀ a b ε : ℝ, dist a b < ε ↔ a < b + ε ∧ b - ε < a by
intros; simp only [← Metric.mem_ball, Real.ball_eq_Ioo, Set.mem_Ioo, and_comm]]
fconstructor
· dsimp
simp only [Finset.inf'_lt_iff, ContinuousMap.inf'_apply]
exact Set.exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top _ _ xs_w z
· dsimp
simp only [Finset.lt_inf'_iff, ContinuousMap.inf'_apply]
rintro x -
apply lt_h
#align continuous_map.sublattice_closure_eq_top ContinuousMap.sublattice_closure_eq_top
/-- The **Stone-Weierstrass Approximation Theorem**,
that a subalgebra `A` of `C(X, ℝ)`, where `X` is a compact topological space,
is dense if it separates points.
-/
theorem subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) : A.topologicalClosure = ⊤ := by
-- The closure of `A` is closed under taking `sup` and `inf`,
-- and separates points strongly (since `A` does),
-- so we can apply `sublattice_closure_eq_top`.
apply SetLike.ext'
let L := A.topologicalClosure
have n : Set.Nonempty (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) := ⟨(1 : C(X, ℝ)), A.le_topologicalClosure A.one_mem⟩
convert
sublattice_closure_eq_top (L : Set C(X, ℝ)) n
(fun f fm g gm => inf_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.isClosed_topologicalClosure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(fun f fm g gm => sup_mem_closed_subalgebra L A.isClosed_topologicalClosure ⟨f, fm⟩ ⟨g, gm⟩)
(Subalgebra.SeparatesPoints.strongly
(Subalgebra.separatesPoints_monotone A.le_topologicalClosure w))
simp [L]
#align continuous_map.subalgebra_topological_closure_eq_top_of_separates_points ContinuousMap.subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints
/-- An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is a uniform limit of elements of `A`.
-/
theorem continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) (f : C(X, ℝ)) : f ∈ A.topologicalClosure := by
rw [subalgebra_topologicalClosure_eq_top_of_separatesPoints A w]
simp
#align continuous_map.continuous_map_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separates_points ContinuousMap.continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints
/-- An alternative statement of the Stone-Weierstrass theorem,
for those who like their epsilons.
If `A` is a subalgebra of `C(X, ℝ)` which separates points (and `X` is compact),
every real-valued continuous function on `X` is within any `ε > 0` of some element of `A`.
-/
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousFunction/StoneWeierstrass.lean | 309 | 317 | theorem exists_mem_subalgebra_near_continuousMap_of_separatesPoints (A : Subalgebra ℝ C(X, ℝ))
(w : A.SeparatesPoints) (f : C(X, ℝ)) (ε : ℝ) (pos : 0 < ε) :
∃ g : A, ‖(g : C(X, ℝ)) - f‖ < ε := by |
have w :=
mem_closure_iff_frequently.mp (continuousMap_mem_subalgebra_closure_of_separatesPoints A w f)
rw [Metric.nhds_basis_ball.frequently_iff] at w
obtain ⟨g, H, m⟩ := w ε pos
rw [Metric.mem_ball, dist_eq_norm] at H
exact ⟨⟨g, m⟩, H⟩
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Measure
#align_import measure_theory.group.prod from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"fd5edc43dc4f10b85abfe544b88f82cf13c5f844"
/-!
# Measure theory in the product of groups
In this file we show properties about measure theory in products of measurable groups
and properties of iterated integrals in measurable groups.
These lemmas show the uniqueness of left invariant measures on measurable groups, up to
scaling. In this file we follow the proof and refer to the book *Measure Theory* by Paul Halmos.
The idea of the proof is to use the translation invariance of measures to prove `μ(t) = c * μ(s)`
for two sets `s` and `t`, where `c` is a constant that does not depend on `μ`. Let `e` and `f` be
the characteristic functions of `s` and `t`.
Assume that `μ` and `ν` are left-invariant measures. Then the map `(x, y) ↦ (y * x, x⁻¹)`
preserves the measure `μ × ν`, which means that
```
∫ x, ∫ y, h x y ∂ν ∂μ = ∫ x, ∫ y, h (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ
```
If we apply this to `h x y := e x * f y⁻¹ / ν ((fun h ↦ h * y⁻¹) ⁻¹' s)`, we can rewrite the RHS to
`μ(t)`, and the LHS to `c * μ(s)`, where `c = c(ν)` does not depend on `μ`.
Applying this to `μ` and to `ν` gives `μ (t) / μ (s) = ν (t) / ν (s)`, which is the uniqueness up to
scalar multiplication.
The proof in [Halmos] seems to contain an omission in §60 Th. A, see
`MeasureTheory.measure_lintegral_div_measure`.
Note that this theory only applies in measurable groups, i.e., when multiplication and inversion
are measurable. This is not the case in general in locally compact groups, or even in compact
groups, when the topology is not second-countable. For arguments along the same line, but using
continuous functions instead of measurable sets and working in the general locally compact
setting, see the file `MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.Unique.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set hiding prod_eq
open Function MeasureTheory
open Filter hiding map
open scoped Classical ENNReal Pointwise MeasureTheory
variable (G : Type*) [MeasurableSpace G]
variable [Group G] [MeasurableMul₂ G]
variable (μ ν : Measure G) [SigmaFinite ν] [SigmaFinite μ] {s : Set G}
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`. -/
@[to_additive "The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` as a `MeasurableEquiv`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.mulLeft with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk measurable_mul
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_fst.inv.mul measurable_snd }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_mul_right MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_add_right MeasurableEquiv.shearAddRight
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y / x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, yx)` -/
@[to_additive
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, y - x)` as a `MeasurableEquiv` with as inverse `(x, y) ↦ (x, y + x)`."]
protected def MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight [MeasurableInv G] : G × G ≃ᵐ G × G :=
{ Equiv.prodShear (Equiv.refl _) Equiv.divRight with
measurable_toFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.div measurable_fst
measurable_invFun := measurable_fst.prod_mk <| measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst }
#align measurable_equiv.shear_div_right MeasurableEquiv.shearDivRight
#align measurable_equiv.shear_sub_right MeasurableEquiv.shearSubRight
variable {G}
namespace MeasureTheory
open Measure
section LeftInvariant
/-- The multiplicative shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`.
This condition is part of the definition of a measurable group in [Halmos, §59].
There, the map in this lemma is called `S`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add
" The shear mapping `(x, y) ↦ (x, x + y)` preserves the measure `μ × ν`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1 * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(MeasurePreserving.id μ).skew_product measurable_mul <|
Filter.eventually_of_forall <| map_mul_left_eq_self ν
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, yx)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the map `SR` in [Halmos, §59].
`S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
" The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y + x)` sends the measure `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`. "]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap [IsMulLeftInvariant μ] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2 * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_add_swap
@[to_additive]
theorem measurable_measure_mul_right (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Measurable fun x => μ ((fun y => y * x) ⁻¹' s) := by
suffices
Measurable fun y =>
μ ((fun x => (x, y)) ⁻¹' ((fun z : G × G => ((1 : G), z.1 * z.2)) ⁻¹' univ ×ˢ s))
by convert this using 1; ext1 x; congr 1 with y : 1; simp
apply measurable_measure_prod_mk_right
apply measurable_const.prod_mk measurable_mul (MeasurableSet.univ.prod hs)
infer_instance
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_mul_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_mul_right
#align measure_theory.measurable_measure_add_right MeasureTheory.measurable_measure_add_right
variable [MeasurableInv G]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, x⁻¹y)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (x, - x + y)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.1, z.1⁻¹ * z.2)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_mul μ ν).symm <| MeasurableEquiv.shearMulRight G
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add
variable [IsMulLeftInvariant μ]
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, y⁻¹x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`.
This is the function `S⁻¹R` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y, - y + x)` sends `μ × ν` to `ν × μ`."]
theorem measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2, z.2⁻¹ * z.1)) (μ.prod ν) (ν.prod μ) :=
(measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul ν μ).comp measurePreserving_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_inv_mul_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_prod_neg_add_swap MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_prod_neg_add_swap
/-- The map `(x, y) ↦ (yx, x⁻¹)` is measure-preserving.
This is the function `S⁻¹RSR` in [Halmos, §59],
where `S` is the map `(x, y) ↦ (x, xy)` and `R` is `Prod.swap`. -/
@[to_additive measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
"The map `(x, y) ↦ (y + x, - x)` is measure-preserving."]
theorem measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] :
MeasurePreserving (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod ν) (μ.prod ν) := by
convert (measurePreserving_prod_inv_mul_swap ν μ).comp (measurePreserving_prod_mul_swap μ ν)
using 1
ext1 ⟨x, y⟩
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, mul_inv_rev, inv_mul_cancel_right]
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_mul_prod_inv MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv
#align measure_theory.measure_preserving_add_prod_neg MeasureTheory.measurePreserving_add_prod_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem quasiMeasurePreserving_inv : QuasiMeasurePreserving (Inv.inv : G → G) μ μ := by
refine ⟨measurable_inv, AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hsm hμs => ?_⟩
rw [map_apply measurable_inv hsm, inv_preimage]
have hf : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
suffices map (fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹)) (μ.prod μ) (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) = 0 by
simpa only [(measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ μ).map_eq, prod_prod, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞),
or_self_iff] using this
have hsm' : MeasurableSet (s⁻¹ ×ˢ s⁻¹) := hsm.inv.prod hsm.inv
simp_rw [map_apply hf hsm', prod_apply_symm (μ := μ) (ν := μ) (hf hsm'), preimage_preimage,
mk_preimage_prod, inv_preimage, inv_inv, measure_mono_null inter_subset_right hμs,
lintegral_zero]
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_inv MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_inv
#align measure_theory.quasi_measure_preserving_neg MeasureTheory.quasiMeasurePreserving_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_inv_null : μ s⁻¹ = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun hs => ?_, (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null⟩
rw [← inv_inv s]
exact (quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).preimage_null hs
#align measure_theory.measure_inv_null MeasureTheory.measure_inv_null
#align measure_theory.measure_neg_null MeasureTheory.measure_neg_null
@[to_additive]
theorem inv_absolutelyContinuous : μ.inv ≪ μ :=
(quasiMeasurePreserving_inv μ).absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.inv_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.inv_absolutelyContinuous
#align measure_theory.neg_absolutely_continuous MeasureTheory.neg_absolutelyContinuous
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_inv : μ ≪ μ.inv := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s _ => ?_
simp_rw [inv_apply μ s, measure_inv_null, imp_self]
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_inv MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_inv
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_neg MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (f : G → G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : AEMeasurable (uncurry f) (μ.prod ν)) :
(∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f (y * x) x⁻¹ ∂ν ∂μ) = ∫⁻ x, ∫⁻ y, f x y ∂ν ∂μ := by
have h : Measurable fun z : G × G => (z.2 * z.1, z.1⁻¹) :=
(measurable_snd.mul measurable_fst).prod_mk measurable_fst.inv
have h2f : AEMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => f (y * x) x⁻¹) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.comp_quasiMeasurePreserving (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).quasiMeasurePreserving
simp_rw [lintegral_lintegral h2f, lintegral_lintegral hf]
conv_rhs => rw [← (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq]
symm
exact
lintegral_map' (hf.mono' (measurePreserving_mul_prod_inv μ ν).map_eq.absolutelyContinuous)
h.aemeasurable
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv
#align measure_theory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg MeasureTheory.lintegral_lintegral_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_null (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ s = 0 :=
calc
μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ μ ((fun x => y⁻¹ * x) ⁻¹' s⁻¹)⁻¹ = 0 := by
simp_rw [← inv_preimage, preimage_preimage, mul_inv_rev, inv_inv]
_ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [measure_inv_null μ, measure_preimage_mul]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_null
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_null MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_null
@[to_additive]
theorem measure_mul_right_ne_zero (h2s : μ s ≠ 0) (y : G) : μ ((fun x => x * y) ⁻¹' s) ≠ 0 :=
(not_congr (measure_mul_right_null μ y)).mpr h2s
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_mul_right_ne_zero
#align measure_theory.measure_add_right_ne_zero MeasureTheory.measure_add_right_ne_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right (g : G) : μ ≪ map (· * g) μ := by
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s hs => ?_
rw [map_apply (measurable_mul_const g) hs, measure_mul_right_null]; exact id
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_mul_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_mul_right
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_add_right MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_add_right
@[to_additive]
theorem absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left (g : G) : μ ≪ map (fun h => g / h) μ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
erw [← map_map (measurable_const_mul g) measurable_inv]
conv_lhs => rw [← map_mul_left_eq_self μ g]
exact (absolutelyContinuous_inv μ).map (measurable_const_mul g)
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_div_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_div_left
#align measure_theory.absolutely_continuous_map_sub_left MeasureTheory.absolutelyContinuous_map_sub_left
/-- This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]. -/
@[to_additive "This is the computation performed in the proof of [Halmos, §60 Th. A]."]
theorem measure_mul_lintegral_eq [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (sm : MeasurableSet s) (f : G → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf : Measurable f) : (μ s * ∫⁻ y, f y ∂ν) = ∫⁻ x, ν ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s) * f x⁻¹ ∂μ := by
rw [← set_lintegral_one, ← lintegral_indicator _ sm,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul (measurable_const.indicator sm).aemeasurable hf.aemeasurable,
← lintegral_lintegral_mul_inv μ ν]
swap
· exact (((measurable_const.indicator sm).comp measurable_fst).mul
(hf.comp measurable_snd)).aemeasurable
have ms :
∀ x : G, Measurable fun y => ((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun _ => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) y :=
fun x => measurable_const.indicator (measurable_mul_const _ sm)
have : ∀ x y, s.indicator (fun _ : G => (1 : ℝ≥0∞)) (y * x) =
((fun z => z * x) ⁻¹' s).indicator (fun b : G => 1) y := by
intro x y; symm; convert indicator_comp_right (M := ℝ≥0∞) fun y => y * x using 2; ext1; rfl
simp_rw [this, lintegral_mul_const _ (ms _), lintegral_indicator _ (measurable_mul_const _ sm),
set_lintegral_one]
#align measure_theory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_mul_lintegral_eq
#align measure_theory.measure_add_lintegral_eq MeasureTheory.measure_add_lintegral_eq
/-- Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. -/
@[to_additive
" Any two nonzero left-invariant measures are absolutely continuous w.r.t. each other. "]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Group/Prod.lean | 269 | 274 | theorem absolutelyContinuous_of_isMulLeftInvariant [IsMulLeftInvariant ν] (hν : ν ≠ 0) : μ ≪ ν := by |
refine AbsolutelyContinuous.mk fun s sm hνs => ?_
have h1 := measure_mul_lintegral_eq μ ν sm 1 measurable_one
simp_rw [Pi.one_apply, lintegral_one, mul_one, (measure_mul_right_null ν _).mpr hνs,
lintegral_zero, mul_eq_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞), measure_univ_eq_zero.not.mpr hν, or_false_iff] at h1
exact h1
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury G. Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury G. Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
#align_import data.fin.tuple.monotone from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"e3d9ab8faa9dea8f78155c6c27d62a621f4c152d"
/-!
# Monotone finite sequences
In this file we prove `simp` lemmas that allow to simplify propositions like `Monotone ![a, b, c]`.
-/
open Set Fin Matrix Function
variable {α : Type*}
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Monotone.lean | 21 | 24 | theorem liftFun_vecCons {n : ℕ} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} {a : α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) (vecCons a f) (vecCons a f) ↔ r a (f 0) ∧ ((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f := by |
simp only [liftFun_iff_succ r, forall_fin_succ, cons_val_succ, cons_val_zero, ← succ_castSucc,
castSucc_zero]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Composition
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ChartedSpace
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.FiniteDimension
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
#align_import geometry.manifold.smooth_manifold_with_corners from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"ddec54a71a0dd025c05445d467f1a2b7d586a3ba"
/-!
# Smooth manifolds (possibly with boundary or corners)
A smooth manifold is a manifold modelled on a normed vector space, or a subset like a
half-space (to get manifolds with boundaries) for which the changes of coordinates are smooth maps.
We define a model with corners as a map `I : H → E` embedding nicely the topological space `H` in
the vector space `E` (or more precisely as a structure containing all the relevant properties).
Given such a model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of local
homeomorphisms of `H` which are smooth when read in `E` (for any regularity `n : ℕ∞`).
With this groupoid at hand and the general machinery of charted spaces, we thus get the notion
of `C^n` manifold with respect to any model with corners `I` on `(E, H)`. We also introduce a
specific type class for `C^∞` manifolds as these are the most commonly used.
Some texts assume manifolds to be Hausdorff and secound countable. We (in mathlib) assume neither,
but add these assumptions later as needed. (Quite a few results still do not require them.)
## Main definitions
* `ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H` :
a structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space E over the field `𝕜`. This is all that is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
* `modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E` :
trivial model with corners structure on the space `E` embedded in itself by the identity.
* `contDiffGroupoid n I` :
when `I` is a model with corners on `(𝕜, E, H)`, this is the groupoid of partial homeos of `H`
which are of class `C^n` over the normed field `𝕜`, when read in `E`.
* `SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M` :
a type class saying that the charted space `M`, modelled on the space `H`, has `C^∞` changes of
coordinates with respect to the model with corners `I` on `(𝕜, E, H)`. This type class is just
a shortcut for `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)`.
* `extChartAt I x`:
in a smooth manifold with corners with the model `I` on `(E, H)`, the charts take values in `H`,
but often we may want to use their `E`-valued version, obtained by composing the charts with `I`.
Since the target is in general not open, we can not register them as partial homeomorphisms, but
we register them as `PartialEquiv`s.
`extChartAt I x` is the canonical such partial equiv around `x`.
As specific examples of models with corners, we define (in `Geometry.Manifold.Instances.Real`)
* `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` for the model space used to define
`n`-dimensional real manifolds without boundary (with notation `𝓡 n` in the locale `Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanHalfSpace n)` for the model space
used to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with boundary (with notation `𝓡∂ n` in the locale
`Manifold`)
* `ModelWithCorners ℝ (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) (EuclideanQuadrant n)` for the model space used
to define `n`-dimensional real manifolds with corners
With these definitions at hand, to invoke an `n`-dimensional real manifold without boundary,
one could use
`variable {n : ℕ} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace (EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners (𝓡 n) M]`.
However, this is not the recommended way: a theorem proved using this assumption would not apply
for instance to the tangent space of such a manifold, which is modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin n))` and not on `EuclideanSpace (Fin (2 * n))`!
In the same way, it would not apply to product manifolds, modelled on
`(EuclideanSpace (Fin n)) × (EuclideanSpace (Fin m))`.
The right invocation does not focus on one specific construction, but on all constructions sharing
the right properties, like
`variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E]
{I : ModelWithCorners ℝ E E} [I.Boundaryless]
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace E M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M]`
Here, `I.Boundaryless` is a typeclass property ensuring that there is no boundary (this is for
instance the case for `modelWithCornersSelf`, or products of these). Note that one could consider
as a natural assumption to only use the trivial model with corners `modelWithCornersSelf ℝ E`,
but again in product manifolds the natural model with corners will not be this one but the product
one (and they are not defeq as `(fun p : E × F ↦ (p.1, p.2))` is not defeq to the identity).
So, it is important to use the above incantation to maximize the applicability of theorems.
## Implementation notes
We want to talk about manifolds modelled on a vector space, but also on manifolds with
boundary, modelled on a half space (or even manifolds with corners). For the latter examples,
we still want to define smooth functions, tangent bundles, and so on. As smooth functions are
well defined on vector spaces or subsets of these, one could take for model space a subtype of a
vector space. With the drawback that the whole vector space itself (which is the most basic
example) is not directly a subtype of itself: the inclusion of `univ : Set E` in `Set E` would
show up in the definition, instead of `id`.
A good abstraction covering both cases it to have a vector
space `E` (with basic example the Euclidean space), a model space `H` (with basic example the upper
half space), and an embedding of `H` into `E` (which can be the identity for `H = E`, or
`Subtype.val` for manifolds with corners). We say that the pair `(E, H)` with their embedding is a
model with corners, and we encompass all the relevant properties (in particular the fact that the
image of `H` in `E` should have unique differentials) in the definition of `ModelWithCorners`.
We concentrate on `C^∞` manifolds: all the definitions work equally well for `C^n` manifolds, but
later on it is a pain to carry all over the smoothness parameter, especially when one wants to deal
with `C^k` functions as there would be additional conditions `k ≤ n` everywhere. Since one deals
almost all the time with `C^∞` (or analytic) manifolds, this seems to be a reasonable choice that
one could revisit later if needed. `C^k` manifolds are still available, but they should be called
using `HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid k I)` where `I` is the model with corners.
I have considered using the model with corners `I` as a typeclass argument, possibly `outParam`, to
get lighter notations later on, but it did not turn out right, as on `E × F` there are two natural
model with corners, the trivial (identity) one, and the product one, and they are not defeq and one
needs to indicate to Lean which one we want to use.
This means that when talking on objects on manifolds one will most often need to specify the model
with corners one is using. For instance, the tangent bundle will be `TangentBundle I M` and the
derivative will be `mfderiv I I' f`, instead of the more natural notations `TangentBundle 𝕜 M` and
`mfderiv 𝕜 f` (the field has to be explicit anyway, as some manifolds could be considered both as
real and complex manifolds).
-/
noncomputable section
universe u v w u' v' w'
open Set Filter Function
open scoped Manifold Filter Topology
/-- The extended natural number `∞` -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "∞" => (⊤ : ℕ∞)
/-! ### Models with corners. -/
/-- A structure containing informations on the way a space `H` embeds in a
model vector space `E` over the field `𝕜`. This is all what is needed to
define a smooth manifold with model space `H`, and model vector space `E`.
-/
@[ext] -- Porting note(#5171): was nolint has_nonempty_instance
structure ModelWithCorners (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] extends
PartialEquiv H E where
source_eq : source = univ
unique_diff' : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 toPartialEquiv.target
continuous_toFun : Continuous toFun := by continuity
continuous_invFun : Continuous invFun := by continuity
#align model_with_corners ModelWithCorners
attribute [simp, mfld_simps] ModelWithCorners.source_eq
/-- A vector space is a model with corners. -/
def modelWithCornersSelf (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E E where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.refl E
source_eq := rfl
unique_diff' := uniqueDiffOn_univ
continuous_toFun := continuous_id
continuous_invFun := continuous_id
#align model_with_corners_self modelWithCornersSelf
@[inherit_doc] scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ", " E ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E
/-- A normed field is a model with corners. -/
scoped[Manifold] notation "𝓘(" 𝕜 ")" => modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 𝕜
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
namespace ModelWithCorners
/-- Coercion of a model with corners to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` because it is actually
`e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about `toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to
switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' (e : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) fun _ => H → E := ⟨toFun'⟩
/-- The inverse to a model with corners, only registered as a `PartialEquiv`. -/
protected def symm : PartialEquiv E H :=
I.toPartialEquiv.symm
#align model_with_corners.symm ModelWithCorners.symm
/-- See Note [custom simps projection]. We need to specify this projection explicitly in this case,
because it is a composition of multiple projections. -/
def Simps.apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E :=
I
#align model_with_corners.simps.apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.apply
/-- See Note [custom simps projection] -/
def Simps.symm_apply (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*) [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] (H : Type*) [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : E → H :=
I.symm
#align model_with_corners.simps.symm_apply ModelWithCorners.Simps.symm_apply
initialize_simps_projections ModelWithCorners (toFun → apply, invFun → symm_apply)
-- Register a few lemmas to make sure that `simp` puts expressions in normal form
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe : (I.toPartialEquiv : H → E) = I :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_coe (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
((ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : H → E) = (e : H → E) :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_coe ModelWithCorners.mk_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem toPartialEquiv_coe_symm : (I.toPartialEquiv.symm : E → H) = I.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.to_local_equiv_coe_symm ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mk_symm (e : PartialEquiv H E) (a b c d) :
(ModelWithCorners.mk e a b c d : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H).symm = e.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners.mk_symm ModelWithCorners.mk_symm
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous : Continuous I :=
I.continuous_toFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous ModelWithCorners.continuous
protected theorem continuousAt {x} : ContinuousAt I x :=
I.continuous.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at ModelWithCorners.continuousAt
protected theorem continuousWithinAt {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I s x :=
I.continuousAt.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_symm : Continuous I.symm :=
I.continuous_invFun
#align model_with_corners.continuous_symm ModelWithCorners.continuous_symm
theorem continuousAt_symm {x} : ContinuousAt I.symm x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousAt_symm
theorem continuousWithinAt_symm {s x} : ContinuousWithinAt I.symm s x :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousWithinAt
#align model_with_corners.continuous_within_at_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousWithinAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_symm {s} : ContinuousOn I.symm s :=
I.continuous_symm.continuousOn
#align model_with_corners.continuous_on_symm ModelWithCorners.continuousOn_symm
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem target_eq : I.target = range (I : H → E) := by
rw [← image_univ, ← I.source_eq]
exact I.image_source_eq_target.symm
#align model_with_corners.target_eq ModelWithCorners.target_eq
protected theorem unique_diff : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (range I) :=
I.target_eq ▸ I.unique_diff'
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff ModelWithCorners.unique_diff
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem left_inv (x : H) : I.symm (I x) = x := by refine I.left_inv' ?_; simp
#align model_with_corners.left_inv ModelWithCorners.left_inv
protected theorem leftInverse : LeftInverse I.symm I :=
I.left_inv
#align model_with_corners.left_inverse ModelWithCorners.leftInverse
theorem injective : Injective I :=
I.leftInverse.injective
#align model_with_corners.injective ModelWithCorners.injective
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_comp_self : I.symm ∘ I = id :=
I.leftInverse.comp_eq_id
#align model_with_corners.symm_comp_self ModelWithCorners.symm_comp_self
protected theorem rightInvOn : RightInvOn I.symm I (range I) :=
I.leftInverse.rightInvOn_range
#align model_with_corners.right_inv_on ModelWithCorners.rightInvOn
@[simp, mfld_simps]
protected theorem right_inv {x : E} (hx : x ∈ range I) : I (I.symm x) = x :=
I.rightInvOn hx
#align model_with_corners.right_inv ModelWithCorners.right_inv
theorem preimage_image (s : Set H) : I ⁻¹' (I '' s) = s :=
I.injective.preimage_image s
#align model_with_corners.preimage_image ModelWithCorners.preimage_image
protected theorem image_eq (s : Set H) : I '' s = I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I := by
refine (I.toPartialEquiv.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage ?_).trans ?_
· rw [I.source_eq]; exact subset_univ _
· rw [inter_comm, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm]
#align model_with_corners.image_eq ModelWithCorners.image_eq
protected theorem closedEmbedding : ClosedEmbedding I :=
I.leftInverse.closedEmbedding I.continuous_symm I.continuous
#align model_with_corners.closed_embedding ModelWithCorners.closedEmbedding
theorem isClosed_range : IsClosed (range I) :=
I.closedEmbedding.isClosed_range
#align model_with_corners.closed_range ModelWithCorners.isClosed_range
@[deprecated (since := "2024-03-17")] alias closed_range := isClosed_range
theorem map_nhds_eq (x : H) : map I (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhds_eq x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhds_eq
theorem map_nhdsWithin_eq (s : Set H) (x : H) : map I (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[I '' s] I x :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.map_nhdsWithin_eq s x
#align model_with_corners.map_nhds_within_eq ModelWithCorners.map_nhdsWithin_eq
theorem image_mem_nhdsWithin {x : H} {s : Set H} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : I '' s ∈ 𝓝[range I] I x :=
I.map_nhds_eq x ▸ image_mem_map hs
#align model_with_corners.image_mem_nhds_within ModelWithCorners.image_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_image {x : H} {s : Set H} : map I.symm (𝓝[I '' s] I x) = 𝓝[s] x := by
rw [← I.map_nhdsWithin_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_image ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_image
theorem symm_map_nhdsWithin_range (x : H) : map I.symm (𝓝[range I] I x) = 𝓝 x := by
rw [← I.map_nhds_eq, map_map, I.symm_comp_self, map_id]
#align model_with_corners.symm_map_nhds_within_range ModelWithCorners.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range
theorem unique_diff_preimage {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact I.unique_diff.inter (hs.preimage I.continuous_invFun)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage
theorem unique_diff_preimage_source {β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace β] {e : PartialHomeomorph H β} :
UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (I.symm ⁻¹' e.source ∩ range I) :=
I.unique_diff_preimage e.open_source
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_preimage_source ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_preimage_source
theorem unique_diff_at_image {x : H} : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (range I) (I x) :=
I.unique_diff _ (mem_range_self _)
#align model_with_corners.unique_diff_at_image ModelWithCorners.unique_diff_at_image
theorem symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {f : H → X} {s : Set H}
{x : H} :
ContinuousWithinAt (f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (I x) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f s x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· have := h.comp I.continuousWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ _)
simp_rw [preimage_inter, preimage_preimage, I.left_inv, preimage_id', preimage_range,
inter_univ] at this
rwa [Function.comp.assoc, I.symm_comp_self] at this
· rw [← I.left_inv x] at h; exact h.comp I.continuousWithinAt_symm inter_subset_left
#align model_with_corners.symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff ModelWithCorners.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
protected theorem locallyCompactSpace [LocallyCompactSpace E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
LocallyCompactSpace H := by
have : ∀ x : H, (𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun s => s ∈ 𝓝 (I x) ∧ IsCompact s)
fun s => I.symm '' (s ∩ range I) := fun x ↦ by
rw [← I.symm_map_nhdsWithin_range]
exact ((compact_basis_nhds (I x)).inf_principal _).map _
refine .of_hasBasis this ?_
rintro x s ⟨-, hsc⟩
exact (hsc.inter_right I.isClosed_range).image I.continuous_symm
#align model_with_corners.locally_compact ModelWithCorners.locallyCompactSpace
open TopologicalSpace
protected theorem secondCountableTopology [SecondCountableTopology E] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) :
SecondCountableTopology H :=
I.closedEmbedding.toEmbedding.secondCountableTopology
#align model_with_corners.second_countable_topology ModelWithCorners.secondCountableTopology
end ModelWithCorners
section
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- In the trivial model with corners, the associated `PartialEquiv` is the identity. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv : 𝓘(𝕜, E).toPartialEquiv = PartialEquiv.refl E :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_local_equiv modelWithCornersSelf_partialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe : (𝓘(𝕜, E) : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe modelWithCornersSelf_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm : (𝓘(𝕜, E).symm : E → E) = id :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_self_coe_symm modelWithCornersSelf_coe_symm
end
end
section ModelWithCornersProd
/-- Given two model_with_corners `I` on `(E, H)` and `I'` on `(E', H')`, we define the model with
corners `I.prod I'` on `(E × E', ModelProd H H')`. This appears in particular for the manifold
structure on the tangent bundle to a manifold modelled on `(E, H)`: it will be modelled on
`(E × E, H × E)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about `ModelProd H H'`
vs `H × H'`. -/
@[simps (config := .lemmasOnly)]
def ModelWithCorners.prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E') (ModelProd H H') :=
{ I.toPartialEquiv.prod I'.toPartialEquiv with
toFun := fun x => (I x.1, I' x.2)
invFun := fun x => (I.symm x.1, I'.symm x.2)
source := { x | x.1 ∈ I.source ∧ x.2 ∈ I'.source }
source_eq := by simp only [setOf_true, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := I.unique_diff'.prod I'.unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := I.continuous_toFun.prod_map I'.continuous_toFun
continuous_invFun := I.continuous_invFun.prod_map I'.continuous_invFun }
#align model_with_corners.prod ModelWithCorners.prod
/-- Given a finite family of `ModelWithCorners` `I i` on `(E i, H i)`, we define the model with
corners `pi I` on `(Π i, E i, ModelPi H)`. See note [Manifold type tags] for explanation about
`ModelPi H`. -/
def ModelWithCorners.pi {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {ι : Type v} [Fintype ι]
{E : ι → Type w} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (E i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (E i)] {H : ι → Type u'}
[∀ i, TopologicalSpace (H i)] (I : ∀ i, ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E i) (H i)) :
ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (∀ i, E i) (ModelPi H) where
toPartialEquiv := PartialEquiv.pi fun i => (I i).toPartialEquiv
source_eq := by simp only [pi_univ, mfld_simps]
unique_diff' := UniqueDiffOn.pi ι E _ _ fun i _ => (I i).unique_diff'
continuous_toFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous.comp (continuous_apply i)
continuous_invFun := continuous_pi fun i => (I i).continuous_symm.comp (continuous_apply i)
#align model_with_corners.pi ModelWithCorners.pi
/-- Special case of product model with corners, which is trivial on the second factor. This shows up
as the model to tangent bundles. -/
abbrev ModelWithCorners.tangent {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 (E × E) (ModelProd H E) :=
I.prod 𝓘(𝕜, E)
#align model_with_corners.tangent ModelWithCorners.tangent
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {F : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F']
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {G : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace G] {G' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace G'] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H}
{J : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 F G}
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv :
(I.prod J).toPartialEquiv = I.toPartialEquiv.prod J.toPartialEquiv :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_to_local_equiv modelWithCorners_prod_toPartialEquiv
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
(I.prod I' : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I I' :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe modelWithCorners_prod_coe
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
(I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') :
((I.prod I').symm : _ × _ → _ × _) = Prod.map I.symm I'.symm :=
rfl
#align model_with_corners_prod_coe_symm modelWithCorners_prod_coe_symm
theorem modelWithCornersSelf_prod : 𝓘(𝕜, E × F) = 𝓘(𝕜, E).prod 𝓘(𝕜, F) := by ext1 <;> simp
#align model_with_corners_self_prod modelWithCornersSelf_prod
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_prod : range (I.prod J) = range I ×ˢ range J := by
simp_rw [← ModelWithCorners.target_eq]; rfl
#align model_with_corners.range_prod ModelWithCorners.range_prod
end ModelWithCornersProd
section Boundaryless
/-- Property ensuring that the model with corners `I` defines manifolds without boundary. This
differs from the more general `BoundarylessManifold`, which requires every point on the manifold
to be an interior point. -/
class ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) : Prop where
range_eq_univ : range I = univ
#align model_with_corners.boundaryless ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless
theorem ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] :
range I = univ := ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ
/-- If `I` is a `ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless` model, then it is a homeomorphism. -/
@[simps (config := {simpRhs := true})]
def ModelWithCorners.toHomeomorph {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] : H ≃ₜ E where
__ := I
left_inv := I.left_inv
right_inv _ := I.right_inv <| I.range_eq_univ.symm ▸ mem_univ _
/-- The trivial model with corners has no boundary -/
instance modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless (𝕜 : Type*) [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] (E : Type*)
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] : (modelWithCornersSelf 𝕜 E).Boundaryless :=
⟨by simp⟩
#align model_with_corners_self_boundaryless modelWithCornersSelf_boundaryless
/-- If two model with corners are boundaryless, their product also is -/
instance ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod {𝕜 : Type u} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type v}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type w} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [I.Boundaryless] {E' : Type v'} [NormedAddCommGroup E']
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type w'} [TopologicalSpace H'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H')
[I'.Boundaryless] : (I.prod I').Boundaryless := by
constructor
dsimp [ModelWithCorners.prod, ModelProd]
rw [← prod_range_range_eq, ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ,
ModelWithCorners.Boundaryless.range_eq_univ, univ_prod_univ]
#align model_with_corners.range_eq_univ_prod ModelWithCorners.range_eq_univ_prod
end Boundaryless
section contDiffGroupoid
/-! ### Smooth functions on models with corners -/
variable {m n : ℕ∞} {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
variable (n)
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the pregroupoid of `C^n` transformations of `H`
as the maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffPregroupoid : Pregroupoid H where
property f s := ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
comp {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ := by
have : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
simp only [this]
refine hg.comp (hf.mono fun x ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ ↦ ⟨hx1.1, hx2⟩) ?_
rintro x ⟨hx1, _⟩
simp only [mfld_simps] at hx1 ⊢
exact hx1.2
id_mem := by
apply ContDiffOn.congr contDiff_id.contDiffOn
rintro x ⟨_, hx2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hx2 with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy]
simp only [mfld_simps]
locality {f u} _ H := by
apply contDiffOn_of_locally_contDiffOn
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rcases H x hy1 with ⟨v, v_open, xv, hv⟩
have : I.symm ⁻¹' (u ∩ v) ∩ range I = I.symm ⁻¹' u ∩ range I ∩ I.symm ⁻¹' v := by
rw [preimage_inter, inter_assoc, inter_assoc]
congr 1
rw [inter_comm]
rw [this] at hv
exact ⟨I.symm ⁻¹' v, v_open.preimage I.continuous_symm, by simpa, hv⟩
congr {f g u} _ fg hf := by
apply hf.congr
rintro y ⟨hy1, hy2⟩
rcases mem_range.1 hy2 with ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [← hx] at hy1 ⊢
simp only [mfld_simps] at hy1 ⊢
rw [fg _ hy1]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of invertible `C^n` transformations
of `H` as the invertible maps that are `C^n` when read in `E` through `I`. -/
def contDiffGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
Pregroupoid.groupoid (contDiffPregroupoid n I)
#align cont_diff_groupoid contDiffGroupoid
variable {n}
/-- Inclusion of the groupoid of `C^n` local diffeos in the groupoid of `C^m` local diffeos when
`m ≤ n` -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_le (h : m ≤ n) : contDiffGroupoid n I ≤ contDiffGroupoid m I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, contDiffGroupoid]
apply groupoid_of_pregroupoid_le
intro f s hfs
exact ContDiffOn.of_le hfs h
#align cont_diff_groupoid_le contDiffGroupoid_le
/-- The groupoid of `0`-times continuously differentiable maps is just the groupoid of all
partial homeomorphisms -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq : contDiffGroupoid 0 I = continuousGroupoid H := by
apply le_antisymm le_top
intro u _
-- we have to check that every partial homeomorphism belongs to `contDiffGroupoid 0 I`,
-- by unfolding its definition
change u ∈ contDiffGroupoid 0 I
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid, contDiffPregroupoid]
simp only [contDiffOn_zero]
constructor
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
· refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn (u.symm.continuousOn.comp I.continuousOn_symm ?_)
exact (mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left
#align cont_diff_groupoid_zero_eq contDiffGroupoid_zero_eq
variable (n)
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I := by
rw [contDiffGroupoid, mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid]
suffices h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) by
simp [h, contDiffPregroupoid]
have : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n id (univ : Set E) := contDiff_id.contDiffOn
exact this.congr_mono (fun x hx => I.right_inv hx.2) (subset_univ _)
#align of_set_mem_cont_diff_groupoid ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the `C^n` groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ contDiffGroupoid n I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I e.open_target) this
#align symm_trans_mem_cont_diff_groupoid symm_trans_mem_contDiffGroupoid
variable {E' H' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
/-- The product of two smooth partial homeomorphisms is smooth. -/
theorem contDiffGroupoid_prod {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{e : PartialHomeomorph H H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph H' H'} (he : e ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I)
(he' : e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I') : e.prod e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ⊤ (I.prod I') := by
cases' he with he he_symm
cases' he' with he' he'_symm
simp only at he he_symm he' he'_symm
constructor <;> simp only [PartialEquiv.prod_source, PartialHomeomorph.prod_toPartialEquiv,
contDiffPregroupoid]
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he he'
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
· have h3 := ContDiffOn.prod_map he_symm he'_symm
rw [← I.image_eq, ← I'.image_eq, prod_image_image_eq] at h3
rw [← (I.prod I').image_eq]
exact h3
#align cont_diff_groupoid_prod contDiffGroupoid_prod
/-- The `C^n` groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (contDiffGroupoid n I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (contDiffGroupoid n I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid n I hs)
end contDiffGroupoid
section analyticGroupoid
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M]
/-- Given a model with corners `(E, H)`, we define the groupoid of analytic transformations of `H`
as the maps that are analytic and map interior to interior when read in `E` through `I`. We also
explicitly define that they are `C^∞` on the whole domain, since we are only requiring
analyticity on the interior of the domain. -/
def analyticGroupoid : StructureGroupoid H :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) ⊓ Pregroupoid.groupoid
{ property := fun f s => AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I)
comp := fun {f g u v} hf hg _ _ _ => by
simp only [] at hf hg ⊢
have comp : I ∘ (g ∘ f) ∘ I.symm = (I ∘ g ∘ I.symm) ∘ I ∘ f ∘ I.symm := by ext x; simp
apply And.intro
· simp only [comp, preimage_inter]
refine hg.left.comp (hf.left.mono ?_) ?_
· simp only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_right]
rw [inter_assoc]
simp
· intro x hx
apply And.intro
· rw [mem_preimage, comp_apply, I.left_inv]
exact hx.left.right
· apply hf.right
rw [mem_image]
exact ⟨x, ⟨⟨hx.left.left, hx.right⟩, rfl⟩⟩
· simp only [comp]
rw [image_comp]
intro x hx
rw [mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨x', hx'⟩
refine hg.right ⟨x', And.intro ?_ hx'.right⟩
apply And.intro
· have hx'1 : x' ∈ ((v.preimage f).preimage (I.symm)).image (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) := by
refine image_subset (I ∘ f ∘ I.symm) ?_ hx'.left
rw [preimage_inter]
refine Subset.trans ?_ (u.preimage I.symm).inter_subset_right
apply inter_subset_left
rcases hx'1 with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
rw [hx''.right.symm]
simp only [comp_apply, mem_preimage, I.left_inv]
exact hx''.left
· rw [mem_image] at hx'
rcases hx'.left with ⟨x'', hx''⟩
exact hf.right ⟨x'', ⟨⟨hx''.left.left.left, hx''.left.right⟩, hx''.right⟩⟩
id_mem := by
apply And.intro
· simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact AnalyticOn.congr isOpen_interior
(f := (1 : E →L[𝕜] E)) (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
(fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz)).symm)
· intro x hx
simp only [id_comp, comp_apply, preimage_univ, univ_inter, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left)]
exact hy.left
locality := fun {f u} _ h => by
simp only [] at h
simp only [AnalyticOn]
apply And.intro
· intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) (mem_preimage.mp hx.left) with ⟨v, hv⟩
exact hv.right.right.left x ⟨mem_preimage.mpr ⟨hx.left, hv.right.left⟩, hx.right⟩
· apply mapsTo'.mp
simp only [MapsTo]
intro x hx
rcases h (I.symm x) hx.left with ⟨v, hv⟩
apply hv.right.right.right
rw [mem_image]
have hx' := And.intro hx (mem_preimage.mpr hv.right.left)
rw [← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, ← inter_assoc, ← preimage_inter, inter_comm v u] at hx'
exact ⟨x, ⟨hx', rfl⟩⟩
congr := fun {f g u} hu fg hf => by
simp only [] at hf ⊢
apply And.intro
· refine AnalyticOn.congr (IsOpen.inter (hu.preimage I.continuous_symm) isOpen_interior)
hf.left ?_
intro z hz
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [fg (I.symm z) hz.left]
· intro x hx
apply hf.right
rw [mem_image] at hx ⊢
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
refine ⟨y, ⟨hy.left, ?_⟩⟩
rw [comp_apply, comp_apply, fg (I.symm y) hy.left.left] at hy
exact hy.right }
/-- An identity partial homeomorphism belongs to the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid {s : Set H} (hs : IsOpen s) :
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet s hs ∈ analyticGroupoid I := by
rw [analyticGroupoid]
refine And.intro (ofSet_mem_contDiffGroupoid ∞ I hs) ?_
apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr
suffices h : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)) ∧
(I.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ interior (range I)).image (I ∘ I.symm) ⊆ interior (range I) by
simp only [PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_apply, id_comp, PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_toPartialEquiv,
PartialEquiv.ofSet_source, h, comp_apply, mem_range, image_subset_iff, true_and,
PartialHomeomorph.ofSet_symm, PartialEquiv.ofSet_target, and_self]
intro x hx
refine mem_preimage.mpr ?_
rw [← I.right_inv (interior_subset hx.right)] at hx
exact hx.right
apply And.intro
· have : AnalyticOn 𝕜 (1 : E →L[𝕜] E) (univ : Set E) := (fun x _ => (1 : E →L[𝕜] E).analyticAt x)
exact (this.mono (subset_univ (s.preimage (I.symm) ∩ interior (range I)))).congr
((hs.preimage I.continuous_symm).inter isOpen_interior)
fun z hz => (I.right_inv (interior_subset hz.right)).symm
· intro x hx
simp only [comp_apply, mem_image] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, hy⟩
rw [← hy.right, I.right_inv (interior_subset hy.left.right)]
exact hy.left.right
/-- The composition of a partial homeomorphism from `H` to `M` and its inverse belongs to
the analytic groupoid. -/
theorem symm_trans_mem_analyticGroupoid (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) :
e.symm.trans e ∈ analyticGroupoid I :=
haveI : e.symm.trans e ≈ PartialHomeomorph.ofSet e.target e.open_target :=
PartialHomeomorph.symm_trans_self _
StructureGroupoid.mem_of_eqOnSource _ (ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I e.open_target) this
/-- The analytic groupoid is closed under restriction. -/
instance : ClosedUnderRestriction (analyticGroupoid I) :=
(closedUnderRestriction_iff_id_le _).mpr
(by
rw [StructureGroupoid.le_iff]
rintro e ⟨s, hs, hes⟩
apply (analyticGroupoid I).mem_of_eqOnSource' _ _ _ hes
exact ofSet_mem_analyticGroupoid I hs)
/-- The analytic groupoid on a boundaryless charted space modeled on a complete vector space
consists of the partial homeomorphisms which are analytic and have analytic inverse. -/
theorem mem_analyticGroupoid_of_boundaryless [CompleteSpace E] [I.Boundaryless]
(e : PartialHomeomorph H H) :
e ∈ analyticGroupoid I ↔ AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.source) ∧
AnalyticOn 𝕜 (I ∘ e.symm ∘ I.symm) (I '' e.target) := by
apply Iff.intro
· intro he
have := mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mp he.right
simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ, interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true] at this ⊢
exact this
· intro he
apply And.intro
all_goals apply mem_groupoid_of_pregroupoid.mpr; simp only [I.image_eq, I.range_eq_univ,
interior_univ, subset_univ, and_true, contDiffPregroupoid] at he ⊢
· exact ⟨he.left.contDiffOn, he.right.contDiffOn⟩
· exact he
end analyticGroupoid
section SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/-! ### Smooth manifolds with corners -/
/-- Typeclass defining smooth manifolds with corners with respect to a model with corners, over a
field `𝕜` and with infinite smoothness to simplify typeclass search and statements later on. -/
class SmoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] extends
HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) : Prop
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[gr : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M :=
{ gr with }
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.mk' SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk'
theorem smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
(h : ∀ e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H, e ∈ atlas H M → e' ∈ atlas H M →
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (I ∘ e.symm ≫ₕ e' ∘ I.symm) (I.symm ⁻¹' (e.symm ≫ₕ e').source ∩ range I)) :
SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M where
compatible := by
haveI : HasGroupoid M (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) := hasGroupoid_of_pregroupoid _ (h _ _)
apply StructureGroupoid.compatible
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners_of_cont_diff_on smoothManifoldWithCorners_of_contDiffOn
/-- For any model with corners, the model space is a smooth manifold -/
instance model_space_smooth {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I H :=
{ hasGroupoid_model_space _ _ with }
#align model_space_smooth model_space_smooth
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace SmoothManifoldWithCorners
/- We restate in the namespace `SmoothManifoldWithCorners` some lemmas that hold for general
charted space with a structure groupoid, avoiding the need to specify the groupoid
`contDiffGroupoid ∞ I` explicitly. -/
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) (M : Type*)
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
/-- The maximal atlas of `M` for the smooth manifold with corners structure corresponding to the
model with corners `I`. -/
def maximalAtlas :=
(contDiffGroupoid ∞ I).maximalAtlas M
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.maximalAtlas
variable {M}
theorem subset_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] : atlas H M ⊆ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.subset_maximalAtlas _
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.subset_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.subset_maximalAtlas
theorem chart_mem_maximalAtlas [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (x : M) :
chartAt H x ∈ maximalAtlas I M :=
StructureGroupoid.chart_mem_maximalAtlas _ x
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.chart_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.chart_mem_maximalAtlas
variable {I}
theorem compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas {e e' : PartialHomeomorph M H} (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(he' : e' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) : e.symm.trans e' ∈ contDiffGroupoid ∞ I :=
StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas he he'
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.compatible_of_mem_maximal_atlas SmoothManifoldWithCorners.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas
/-- The product of two smooth manifolds with corners is naturally a smooth manifold with corners. -/
instance prod {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} (M : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (M' : Type*) [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
[SmoothManifoldWithCorners I' M'] : SmoothManifoldWithCorners (I.prod I') (M × M') where
compatible := by
rintro f g ⟨f1, hf1, f2, hf2, rfl⟩ ⟨g1, hg1, g2, hg2, rfl⟩
rw [PartialHomeomorph.prod_symm, PartialHomeomorph.prod_trans]
have h1 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I).compatible hf1 hg1
have h2 := (contDiffGroupoid ⊤ I').compatible hf2 hg2
exact contDiffGroupoid_prod h1 h2
#align smooth_manifold_with_corners.prod SmoothManifoldWithCorners.prod
end SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] (e : PartialHomeomorph M H) (h : e.source = Set.univ) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ (e.singletonChartedSpace h) :=
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners.mk' _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ (id _) <|
e.singleton_hasGroupoid h (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I)
#align local_homeomorph.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners PartialHomeomorph.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [Nonempty M] {f : M → H}
(h : OpenEmbedding f) :
@SmoothManifoldWithCorners 𝕜 _ E _ _ H _ I M _ h.singletonChartedSpace :=
(h.toPartialHomeomorph f).singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners I (by simp)
#align open_embedding.singleton_smooth_manifold_with_corners OpenEmbedding.singleton_smoothManifoldWithCorners
namespace TopologicalSpace.Opens
open TopologicalSpace
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) {M : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M] [SmoothManifoldWithCorners I M] (s : Opens M)
instance : SmoothManifoldWithCorners I s :=
{ s.instHasGroupoid (contDiffGroupoid ∞ I) with }
end TopologicalSpace.Opens
section ExtendedCharts
open scoped Topology
variable {𝕜 E M H E' M' H' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace H] [TopologicalSpace M] (f f' : PartialHomeomorph M H)
(I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H) [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [TopologicalSpace H']
[TopologicalSpace M'] (I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H') {s t : Set M}
/-!
### Extended charts
In a smooth manifold with corners, the model space is the space `H`. However, we will also
need to use extended charts taking values in the model vector space `E`. These extended charts are
not `PartialHomeomorph` as the target is not open in `E` in general, but we can still register them
as `PartialEquiv`.
-/
namespace PartialHomeomorph
/-- Given a chart `f` on a manifold with corners, `f.extend I` is the extended chart to the model
vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extend : PartialEquiv M E :=
f.toPartialEquiv ≫ I.toPartialEquiv
#align local_homeomorph.extend PartialHomeomorph.extend
theorem extend_coe : ⇑(f.extend I) = I ∘ f :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe
theorem extend_coe_symm : ⇑(f.extend I).symm = f.symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coe_symm PartialHomeomorph.extend_coe_symm
theorem extend_source : (f.extend I).source = f.source := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.source_eq, preimage_univ, inter_univ]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_source
theorem isOpen_extend_source : IsOpen (f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_source]
exact f.open_source
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_source PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_source
theorem extend_target : (f.extend I).target = I.symm ⁻¹' f.target ∩ range I := by
simp_rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target, I.target_eq, I.toPartialEquiv_coe_symm, inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target PartialHomeomorph.extend_target
theorem extend_target' : (f.extend I).target = I '' f.target := by
rw [extend, PartialEquiv.trans_target'', I.source_eq, univ_inter, I.toPartialEquiv_coe]
lemma isOpen_extend_target [I.Boundaryless] : IsOpen (f.extend I).target := by
rw [extend_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact I.continuous_symm.isOpen_preimage _ f.open_target
theorem mapsTo_extend (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
MapsTo (f.extend I) s ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) := by
rw [mapsTo', extend_coe, extend_coe_symm, preimage_comp, ← I.image_eq, image_comp,
f.image_eq_target_inter_inv_preimage hs]
exact image_subset _ inter_subset_right
#align local_homeomorph.maps_to_extend PartialHomeomorph.mapsTo_extend
theorem extend_left_inv {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) = x :=
(f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_left_inv PartialHomeomorph.extend_left_inv
/-- Variant of `f.extend_left_inv I`, stated in terms of images. -/
lemma extend_left_inv' (ht: t ⊆ f.source) : ((f.extend I).symm ∘ (f.extend I)) '' t = t :=
EqOn.image_eq_self (fun _ hx ↦ f.extend_left_inv I (ht hx))
theorem extend_source_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
(isOpen_extend_source f I).mem_nhds <| by rwa [f.extend_source I]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds
theorem extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : (f.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extend : ContinuousOn (f.extend I) (f.extend I).source := by
refine I.continuous.comp_continuousOn ?_
rw [extend_source]
exact f.continuousOn
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend
theorem continuousAt_extend {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) : ContinuousAt (f.extend I) x :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).continuousAt <| extend_source_mem_nhds f I h
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend
theorem map_extend_nhds {x : M} (hy : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [extend_coe, comp_apply, ← I.map_nhds_eq, ← f.map_nhds_eq, map_map]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhds
theorem map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
rw [f.map_extend_nhds _ hx, I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
theorem extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
(f.extend I).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [← PartialEquiv.image_source_eq_target, ← map_extend_nhds f I hy]
exact image_mem_map (extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] {x} (hx : x ∈ f.source)
{s : Set M} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : (f.extend I) '' s ∈ 𝓝 ((f.extend I) x) := by
rw [← f.map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless _ hx, Filter.mem_map]
filter_upwards [h] using subset_preimage_image (f.extend I) s
theorem extend_target_subset_range : (f.extend I).target ⊆ range I := by simp only [mfld_simps]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_target_subset_range PartialHomeomorph.extend_target_subset_range
lemma interior_extend_target_subset_interior_range :
interior (f.extend I).target ⊆ interior (range I) := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq]
exact inter_subset_right
/-- If `y ∈ f.target` and `I y ∈ interior (range I)`,
then `I y` is an interior point of `(I ∘ f).target`. -/
lemma mem_interior_extend_target {y : H} (hy : y ∈ f.target)
(hy' : I y ∈ interior (range I)) : I y ∈ interior (f.extend I).target := by
rw [f.extend_target, interior_inter, (f.open_target.preimage I.continuous_symm).interior_eq,
mem_inter_iff, mem_preimage]
exact ⟨mem_of_eq_of_mem (I.left_inv (y)) hy, hy'⟩
theorem nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
𝓝[(f.extend I).target] f.extend I y = 𝓝[range I] f.extend I y :=
(nhdsWithin_mono _ (extend_target_subset_range _ _)).antisymm <|
nhdsWithin_le_of_mem (extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.nhds_within_extend_target_eq PartialHomeomorph.nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm' {x : E} (h : x ∈ (f.extend I).target) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm x :=
(f.continuousAt_symm h.2).comp I.continuous_symm.continuousAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm' PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extend_symm {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) :
ContinuousAt (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I x) :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' f I <| (f.extend I).map_source <| by rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_at_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousAt_extend_symm
theorem continuousOn_extend_symm : ContinuousOn (f.extend I).symm (f.extend I).target := fun _ h =>
(continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.continuous_on_extend_symm PartialHomeomorph.continuousOn_extend_symm
theorem extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff {X} [TopologicalSpace X] {g : M → X}
{s : Set M} {x : M} :
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) ((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I x) ↔
ContinuousWithinAt (g ∘ f.symm) (f.symm ⁻¹' s) (f x) := by
rw [← I.symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff]; rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_continuous_within_at_comp_right_iff PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_continuousWithinAt_comp_right_iff
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage' {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((f.extend I).source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) :=
(continuousOn_extend f I).isOpen_inter_preimage (isOpen_extend_source _ _) hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage' PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extend_preimage {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen (f.source ∩ f.extend I ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extend_source f I]; exact isOpen_extend_preimage' f I hs
#align local_homeomorph.is_open_extend_preimage PartialHomeomorph.isOpen_extend_preimage
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' ((f.extend I).source ∩ s)] f.extend I y := by
set e := f.extend I
calc
map e (𝓝[s] y) = map e (𝓝[e.source ∩ s] y) :=
congr_arg (map e) (nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin f I hy)).symm
_ = 𝓝[e '' (e.source ∩ s)] e y :=
((f.extend I).leftInvOn.mono inter_subset_left).map_nhdsWithin_eq
((f.extend I).left_inv <| by rwa [f.extend_source])
(continuousAt_extend_symm f I hy).continuousWithinAt
(continuousAt_extend f I hy).continuousWithinAt
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within_eq_image PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) (hs : s ⊆ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[f.extend I '' s] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ hy, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right]
rwa [extend_source]
theorem map_extend_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y := by
rw [map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image f I hy, nhdsWithin_inter, ←
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ hy, ← nhdsWithin_inter, (f.extend I).image_source_inter_eq',
inter_comm]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝[s] y := by
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin f I hy, map_map, Filter.map_congr, map_id]
exact (f.extend I).leftInvOn.eqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem (extend_source_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ hy)
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
map (f.extend I).symm (𝓝[range I] f.extend I y) = 𝓝 y := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ, ← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I hy, preimage_univ, univ_inter]
#align local_homeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhds_within_range PartialHomeomorph.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range
theorem tendsto_extend_comp_iff {α : Type*} {l : Filter α} {g : α → M}
(hg : ∀ᶠ z in l, g z ∈ f.source) {y : M} (hy : y ∈ f.source) :
Tendsto (f.extend I ∘ g) l (𝓝 (f.extend I y)) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 y) := by
refine ⟨fun h u hu ↦ mem_map.2 ?_, (continuousAt_extend _ _ hy).tendsto.comp⟩
have := (f.continuousAt_extend_symm I hy).tendsto.comp h
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy] at this
filter_upwards [hg, mem_map.1 (this hu)] with z hz hzu
simpa only [(· ∘ ·), extend_left_inv _ _ hz, mem_preimage] using hzu
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
theorem continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'} {y : M}
(hy : y ∈ f.source) (hgy : g y ∈ f'.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousWithinAt (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm)
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (f.extend I y) ↔ ContinuousWithinAt g s y := by
unfold ContinuousWithinAt
simp only [comp_apply]
rw [extend_left_inv _ _ hy, f'.tendsto_extend_comp_iff _ _ hgy,
← f.map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin I hy, tendsto_map'_iff]
rw [← f.map_extend_nhdsWithin I hy, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (f.open_source.mem_nhds hy)] with z hz
rw [comp_apply, extend_left_inv _ _ hz.2]
exact hmaps hz.1
-- there is no definition `writtenInExtend` but we already use some made-up names in this file
/-- If `s ⊆ f.source` and `g x ∈ f'.source` whenever `x ∈ s`, then `g` is continuous on `s` if and
only if `g` written in charts `f.extend I` and `f'.extend I'` is continuous on `f.extend I '' s`. -/
theorem continuousOn_writtenInExtend_iff {f' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'} {g : M → M'}
(hs : s ⊆ f.source) (hmaps : MapsTo g s f'.source) :
ContinuousOn (f'.extend I' ∘ g ∘ (f.extend I).symm) (f.extend I '' s) ↔ ContinuousOn g s := by
refine forall_mem_image.trans <| forall₂_congr fun x hx ↦ ?_
refine (continuousWithinAt_congr_nhds ?_).trans
(continuousWithinAt_writtenInExtend_iff _ _ _ (hs hx) (hmaps hx) hmaps)
rw [← map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin]
exacts [hs hx, hs hx, hs]
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] f.extend I x := by
rwa [← map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin f I h, mem_map] at ht
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_preimage_mem_nhds {x : M} (h : x ∈ f.source) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝 (f.extend I x) := by
apply (continuousAt_extend_symm f I h).preimage_mem_nhds
rwa [(f.extend I).left_inv]
rwa [f.extend_source]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_mem_nhds
/-- Technical lemma to rewrite suitably the preimage of an intersection under an extended chart, to
bring it into a convenient form to apply derivative lemmas. -/
theorem extend_preimage_inter_eq :
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) ∩ range I =
(f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' t := by
mfld_set_tac
#align local_homeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_preimage_inter_eq
-- Porting note: an `aux` lemma that is no longer needed. Delete?
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux {s : Set M} {x : M} (hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)]
((f.extend I).target ∩ (f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s : Set _) := by
rw [f.extend_target, inter_assoc, inter_comm (range I)]
conv =>
congr
· skip
rw [← univ_inter (_ ∩ range I)]
refine (eventuallyEq_univ.mpr ?_).symm.inter EventuallyEq.rfl
refine I.continuousAt_symm.preimage_mem_nhds (f.open_target.mem_nhds ?_)
simp_rw [f.extend_coe, Function.comp_apply, I.left_inv, f.mapsTo hx]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq_aux PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq_aux
theorem extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq {s : Set M} {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ f.source)
(hx : x ∈ f.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I : Set _) =ᶠ[𝓝 (f.extend I x)] f.extend I '' s := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq, ← map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ hx,
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image_of_subset _ _ hx hs]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventually_eq PartialHomeomorph.extend_symm_preimage_inter_range_eventuallyEq
/-! We use the name `extend_coord_change` for `(f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I`. -/
theorem extend_coord_change_source :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source = I '' (f.symm ≫ₕ f').source := by
simp_rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, I.image_eq, extend_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source,
extend_target, inter_right_comm _ (range I)]
rfl
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source
theorem extend_image_source_inter :
f.extend I '' (f.source ∩ f'.source) = ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source := by
simp_rw [f.extend_coord_change_source, f.extend_coe, image_comp I f, trans_source'', symm_symm,
symm_target]
#align local_homeomorph.extend_image_source_inter PartialHomeomorph.extend_image_source_inter
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin {x : E}
(hx : x ∈ ((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] x := by
rw [f.extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ := hx
refine I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hx
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source)
(hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
((f.extend I).symm ≫ f'.extend I).source ∈ 𝓝[range I] f.extend I x := by
apply extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf, hxf'⟩
#align local_homeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhds_within' PartialHomeomorph.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
variable {f f'}
open SmoothManifoldWithCorners
theorem contDiffOn_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source := by
rw [extend_coord_change_source, I.image_eq]
exact (StructureGroupoid.compatible_of_mem_maximalAtlas hf' hf).1
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_on_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : E} (hx : x ∈ ((f'.extend I).symm ≫ f.extend I).source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) x := by
apply (contDiffOn_extend_coord_change I hf hf' x hx).mono_of_mem
rw [extend_coord_change_source] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨z, hz, rfl⟩ := hx
exact I.image_mem_nhdsWithin ((PartialHomeomorph.open_source _).mem_nhds hz)
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change
theorem contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' [ChartedSpace H M] (hf : f ∈ maximalAtlas I M)
(hf' : f' ∈ maximalAtlas I M) {x : M} (hxf : x ∈ f.source) (hxf' : x ∈ f'.source) :
ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ⊤ (f.extend I ∘ (f'.extend I).symm) (range I) (f'.extend I x) := by
refine contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change I hf hf' ?_
rw [← extend_image_source_inter]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ ⟨hxf', hxf⟩
#align local_homeomorph.cont_diff_within_at_extend_coord_change' PartialHomeomorph.contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change'
end PartialHomeomorph
open PartialHomeomorph
variable [ChartedSpace H M] [ChartedSpace H' M']
/-- The preferred extended chart on a manifold with corners around a point `x`, from a neighborhood
of `x` to the model vector space. -/
@[simp, mfld_simps]
def extChartAt (x : M) : PartialEquiv M E :=
(chartAt H x).extend I
#align ext_chart_at extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_coe (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x) = I ∘ chartAt H x :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe extChartAt_coe
theorem extChartAt_coe_symm (x : M) : ⇑(extChartAt I x).symm = (chartAt H x).symm ∘ I.symm :=
rfl
#align ext_chart_at_coe_symm extChartAt_coe_symm
theorem extChartAt_source (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source = (chartAt H x).source :=
extend_source _ _
#align ext_chart_at_source extChartAt_source
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_source (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).source :=
isOpen_extend_source _ _
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_source isOpen_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_source (x : M) : x ∈ (extChartAt I x).source := by
simp only [extChartAt_source, mem_chart_source]
#align mem_ext_chart_source mem_extChartAt_source
theorem mem_extChartAt_target (x : M) : extChartAt I x x ∈ (extChartAt I x).target :=
(extChartAt I x).map_source <| mem_extChartAt_source _ _
theorem extChartAt_target (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target = I.symm ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).target ∩ range I :=
extend_target _ _
#align ext_chart_at_target extChartAt_target
theorem uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target (x : M) : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target := by
rw [extChartAt_target]
exact I.unique_diff_preimage (chartAt H x).open_target
theorem uniqueDiffWithinAt_extChartAt_target (x : M) :
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I x).target (extChartAt I x x) :=
uniqueDiffOn_extChartAt_target I x _ <| mem_extChartAt_target I x
theorem extChartAt_to_inv (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) = x :=
(extChartAt I x).left_inv (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_to_inv extChartAt_to_inv
theorem mapsTo_extChartAt {x : M} (hs : s ⊆ (chartAt H x).source) :
MapsTo (extChartAt I x) s ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) :=
mapsTo_extend _ _ hs
#align maps_to_ext_chart_at mapsTo_extChartAt
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x' :=
extend_source_mem_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds' extChartAt_source_mem_nhds'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝 x :=
extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds extChartAt_source_mem_nhds
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x' :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds' I h)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).source ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds I x)
#align ext_chart_at_source_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_source_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x) (extChartAt I x).source :=
continuousOn_extend _ _
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at continuousOn_extChartAt
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x' :=
continuousAt_extend _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at' continuousAt_extChartAt'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt (x : M) : ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x) x :=
continuousAt_extChartAt' _ (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at continuousAt_extChartAt
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 y) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhds _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds' map_extChartAt_nhds'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds (x : M) : map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhds' I <| mem_extChartAt_source I x
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds map_extChartAt_nhds
theorem map_extChartAt_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝 x) = 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact map_extend_nhds_of_boundaryless (chartAt H x) I (mem_chart_source H x)
variable {x} in
theorem extChartAt_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless [I.Boundaryless]
{x : M} (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : extChartAt I x '' s ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
rw [extChartAt]
exact extend_image_nhd_mem_nhds_of_boundaryless _ I (mem_chart_source H x) hx
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within' extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin'
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x :=
extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align ext_chart_at_target_mem_nhds_within extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin
/-- If we're boundaryless, `extChartAt` has open target -/
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_target [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) : IsOpen (extChartAt I x).target := by
simp_rw [extChartAt_target, I.range_eq_univ, inter_univ]
exact (PartialHomeomorph.open_target _).preimage I.continuous_symm
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of the key point -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds [I.Boundaryless] (x : M) :
(extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 (extChartAt I x x) := by
convert extChartAt_target_mem_nhdsWithin I x
simp only [I.range_eq_univ, nhdsWithin_univ]
/-- If we're boundaryless, `(extChartAt I x).target` is a neighborhood of any of its points -/
theorem extChartAt_target_mem_nhds' [I.Boundaryless] {x : M} {y : E}
(m : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) : (extChartAt I x).target ∈ 𝓝 y :=
(isOpen_extChartAt_target I x).mem_nhds m
theorem extChartAt_target_subset_range (x : M) : (extChartAt I x).target ⊆ range I := by
simp only [mfld_simps]
#align ext_chart_at_target_subset_range extChartAt_target_subset_range
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] extChartAt I x y = 𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y :=
nhdsWithin_extend_target_eq _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq' nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq'
theorem nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq (x : M) :
𝓝[(extChartAt I x).target] (extChartAt I x) x = 𝓝[range I] (extChartAt I x) x :=
nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align nhds_within_ext_chart_at_target_eq nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' {x : M} {y : E} (h : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).target) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm y :=
continuousAt_extend_symm' _ _ h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm'' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm''
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x x') :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' I <| (extChartAt I x).map_source h
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm' continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'
theorem continuousAt_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousAt (extChartAt I x).symm ((extChartAt I x) x) :=
continuousAt_extChartAt_symm' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align continuous_at_ext_chart_at_symm continuousAt_extChartAt_symm
theorem continuousOn_extChartAt_symm (x : M) :
ContinuousOn (extChartAt I x).symm (extChartAt I x).target :=
fun _y hy => (continuousAt_extChartAt_symm'' _ hy).continuousWithinAt
#align continuous_on_ext_chart_at_symm continuousOn_extChartAt_symm
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) :=
isOpen_extend_preimage' _ _ hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage' isOpen_extChartAt_preimage'
theorem isOpen_extChartAt_preimage (x : M) {s : Set E} (hs : IsOpen s) :
IsOpen ((chartAt H x).source ∩ extChartAt I x ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← extChartAt_source I]
exact isOpen_extChartAt_preimage' I x hs
#align is_open_ext_chart_at_preimage isOpen_extChartAt_preimage
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin_eq_image _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) =
𝓝[extChartAt I x '' ((extChartAt I x).source ∩ s)] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within_eq_image map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin_eq_image
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] y) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y :=
map_extend_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x) (𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x :=
map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_nhds_within map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x y) =
𝓝[s] y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' {x y : M} (hy : y ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x y) = 𝓝 y :=
map_extend_symm_nhdsWithin_range _ _ <| by rwa [← extChartAt_source I]
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range' map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range'
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] extChartAt I x x) =
𝓝[s] x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin
theorem map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range (x : M) :
map (extChartAt I x).symm (𝓝[range I] extChartAt I x x) = 𝓝 x :=
map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range' I (mem_extChartAt_source I x)
#align map_ext_chart_at_symm_nhds_within_range map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin_range
/-- Technical lemma ensuring that the preimage under an extended chart of a neighborhood of a point
in the source is a neighborhood of the preimage, within a set. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/SmoothManifoldWithCorners.lean | 1,500 | 1,503 | theorem extChartAt_preimage_mem_nhdsWithin' {x x' : M} (h : x' ∈ (extChartAt I x).source)
(ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') :
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' t ∈ 𝓝[(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] (extChartAt I x) x' := by |
rwa [← map_extChartAt_symm_nhdsWithin' I h, mem_map] at ht
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.CommRing
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Determinant.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.mv_polynomial from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3e068ece210655b7b9a9477c3aff38a492400aa1"
/-!
# Matrices of multivariate polynomials
In this file, we prove results about matrices over an mv_polynomial ring.
In particular, we provide `Matrix.mvPolynomialX` which associates every entry of a matrix with a
unique variable.
## Tags
matrix determinant, multivariate polynomial
-/
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false
variable {m n R S : Type*}
namespace Matrix
variable (m n R)
/-- The matrix with variable `X (i,j)` at location `(i,j)`. -/
noncomputable def mvPolynomialX [CommSemiring R] : Matrix m n (MvPolynomial (m × n) R) :=
of fun i j => MvPolynomial.X (i, j)
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X Matrix.mvPolynomialX
-- TODO: set as an equation lemma for `mv_polynomial_X`, see mathlib4#3024
@[simp]
theorem mvPolynomialX_apply [CommSemiring R] (i j) :
mvPolynomialX m n R i j = MvPolynomial.X (i, j) :=
rfl
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_apply Matrix.mvPolynomialX_apply
variable {m n R}
/-- Any matrix `A` can be expressed as the evaluation of `Matrix.mvPolynomialX`.
This is of particular use when `MvPolynomial (m × n) R` is an integral domain but `S` is
not, as if the `MvPolynomial.eval₂` can be pulled to the outside of a goal, it can be solved in
under cancellative assumptions. -/
theorem mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] (f : R →+* S) (A : Matrix m n S) :
(mvPolynomialX m n R).map (MvPolynomial.eval₂ f fun p : m × n => A p.1 p.2) = A :=
ext fun i j => MvPolynomial.eval₂_X _ (fun p : m × n => A p.1 p.2) (i, j)
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_eval₂ Matrix.mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂` with a bundled `RingHom` on the LHS. -/
theorem mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommSemiring R]
(A : Matrix m m R) :
(MvPolynomial.eval fun p : m × m => A p.1 p.2).mapMatrix (mvPolynomialX m m R) = A :=
mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ _ A
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_matrix_eval Matrix.mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval
variable (R)
/-- A variant of `Matrix.mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂` with a bundled `AlgHom` on the LHS. -/
theorem mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval [Fintype m] [DecidableEq m] [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
[Algebra R S] (A : Matrix m m S) :
(MvPolynomial.aeval fun p : m × m => A p.1 p.2).mapMatrix (mvPolynomialX m m R) = A :=
mvPolynomialX_map_eval₂ _ A
#align matrix.mv_polynomial_X_map_matrix_aeval Matrix.mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_aeval
variable (m)
/-- In a nontrivial ring, `Matrix.mvPolynomialX m m R` has non-zero determinant. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/MvPolynomial.lean | 75 | 80 | theorem det_mvPolynomialX_ne_zero [DecidableEq m] [Fintype m] [CommRing R] [Nontrivial R] :
det (mvPolynomialX m m R) ≠ 0 := by |
intro h_det
have := congr_arg Matrix.det (mvPolynomialX_mapMatrix_eval (1 : Matrix m m R))
rw [det_one, ← RingHom.map_det, h_det, RingHom.map_zero] at this
exact zero_ne_one this
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Perfect
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AnnihilatingPolynomial
import Mathlib.Order.CompleteSublattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Artinian
import Mathlib.RingTheory.QuotientNilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.SimpleModule
/-!
# Semisimple linear endomorphisms
Given an `R`-module `M` together with an `R`-linear endomorphism `f : M → M`, the following two
conditions are equivalent:
1. Every `f`-invariant submodule of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement.
2. `M` is a semisimple `R[X]`-module, where the action of the polynomial ring is induced by `f`.
A linear endomorphism `f` satisfying these equivalent conditions is known as a *semisimple*
endomorphism. We provide basic definitions and results about such endomorphisms in this file.
## Main definitions / results:
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple`: the definition that a linear endomorphism is semisimple
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`: the characterisation of semisimplicity in terms of invariant
submodules.
* `Module.End.eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple`: the zero endomorphism is the only endomorphism
that is both nilpotent and semisimple.
* `Module.End.isSemisimple_of_squarefree_aeval_eq_zero`: an endomorphism that is a root of a
square-free polynomial is semisimple (in finite dimensions over a field).
* `Module.End.IsSemisimple.minpoly_squarefree`: the minimal polynomial of a semisimple
endomorphism is squarefree.
* `IsSemisimple.of_mem_adjoin_pair`: every endomorphism in the subalgebra generated by two
commuting semisimple endomorphisms is semisimple, if the base field is perfect.
## TODO
In finite dimensions over a field:
* Triangularizable iff diagonalisable for semisimple endomorphisms
-/
open Set Function Polynomial
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
namespace Module.End
section CommRing
variable (f g : End R M)
/-- A linear endomorphism of an `R`-module `M` is called *semisimple* if the induced `R[X]`-module
structure on `M` is semisimple. This is equivalent to saying that every `f`-invariant `R`-submodule
of `M` has an `f`-invariant complement: see `Module.End.isSemisimple_iff`. -/
abbrev IsSemisimple := IsSemisimpleModule R[X] (AEval' f)
variable {f g}
lemma isSemisimple_iff :
f.IsSemisimple ↔ ∀ p : Submodule R M, p ≤ p.comap f → ∃ q, q ≤ q.comap f ∧ IsCompl p q := by
set s := (AEval.comapSubmodule R M f).range
have h : s = {p : Submodule R M | p ≤ p.comap f} := AEval.range_comapSubmodule R M f
let e := CompleteLatticeHom.toOrderIsoRangeOfInjective _ (AEval.injective_comapSubmodule R M f)
simp_rw [Module.End.IsSemisimple, IsSemisimpleModule, e.complementedLattice_iff,
s.isComplemented_iff, ← SetLike.mem_coe, h, mem_setOf_eq]
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_zero [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (0 : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_id [IsSemisimpleModule R M] : IsSemisimple (LinearMap.id : Module.End R M) := by
simpa [isSemisimple_iff] using exists_isCompl
@[simp] lemma isSemisimple_neg : (-f).IsSemisimple ↔ f.IsSemisimple := by simp [isSemisimple_iff]
lemma eq_zero_of_isNilpotent_isSemisimple (hn : IsNilpotent f) (hs : f.IsSemisimple) : f = 0 := by
have ⟨n, h0⟩ := hn
rw [← aeval_X (R := R) f]; rw [← aeval_X_pow (R := R) f] at h0
rw [← RingHom.mem_ker, ← AEval.annihilator_eq_ker_aeval (M := M)] at h0 ⊢
exact hs.annihilator_isRadical ⟨n, h0⟩
@[simp]
lemma isSemisimple_sub_algebraMap_iff {μ : R} :
(f - algebraMap R (End R M) μ).IsSemisimple ↔ f.IsSemisimple := by
suffices ∀ p : Submodule R M, p ≤ p.comap (f - algebraMap R (Module.End R M) μ) ↔ p ≤ p.comap f by
simp [isSemisimple_iff, this]
refine fun p ↦ ⟨fun h x hx ↦ ?_, fun h x hx ↦ p.sub_mem (h hx) (p.smul_mem μ hx)⟩
simpa using p.add_mem (h hx) (p.smul_mem μ hx)
lemma IsSemisimple.restrict {p : Submodule R M} {hp : MapsTo f p p} (hf : f.IsSemisimple) :
IsSemisimple (f.restrict hp) := by
simp only [isSemisimple_iff] at hf ⊢
intro q hq
replace hq : MapsTo f (q.map p.subtype) (q.map p.subtype) := by
rintro - ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, hx', rfl⟩; exact ⟨⟨f x, hp hx⟩, by simpa using hq hx', rfl⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := hf _ hq
refine ⟨r.comap p.subtype, fun x hx ↦ hr₁ hx, ?_⟩
rw [← q.comap_map_eq_of_injective p.injective_subtype]
exact p.isCompl_comap_subtype_of_isCompl_of_le hr₂ <| p.map_subtype_le q
end CommRing
section field
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [Module K M] {f g : End K M}
lemma IsSemisimple_smul_iff {t : K} (ht : t ≠ 0) :
(t • f).IsSemisimple ↔ f.IsSemisimple := by
simp [isSemisimple_iff, Submodule.comap_smul f (h := ht)]
lemma IsSemisimple_smul (t : K) (h : f.IsSemisimple) :
(t • f).IsSemisimple := by
wlog ht : t ≠ 0; · simp [not_not.mp ht]
rwa [IsSemisimple_smul_iff ht]
theorem isSemisimple_of_squarefree_aeval_eq_zero {p : K[X]}
(hp : Squarefree p) (hpf : aeval f p = 0) : f.IsSemisimple := by
rw [← RingHom.mem_ker, ← AEval.annihilator_eq_ker_aeval (M := M), mem_annihilator,
← IsTorsionBy, ← isTorsionBySet_singleton_iff, isTorsionBySet_iff_is_torsion_by_span] at hpf
let R := K[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {p}
have : IsReduced R :=
(Ideal.isRadical_iff_quotient_reduced _).mp (isRadical_iff_span_singleton.mp hp.isRadical)
have : FiniteDimensional K R := (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis hp.ne_zero).finite
have : IsArtinianRing R := .of_finite K R
have : IsSemisimpleRing R := IsArtinianRing.isSemisimpleRing_of_isReduced R
letI : Module R (AEval' f) := Module.IsTorsionBySet.module hpf
let e : AEval' f →ₛₗ[Ideal.Quotient.mk (Ideal.span {p})] AEval' f :=
{ AddMonoidHom.id _ with map_smul' := fun _ _ ↦ rfl }
exact (e.isSemisimpleModule_iff_of_bijective bijective_id).mpr inferInstance
variable [FiniteDimensional K M]
section
variable (hf : f.IsSemisimple)
/-- The minimal polynomial of a semisimple endomorphism is square free -/
theorem IsSemisimple.minpoly_squarefree : Squarefree (minpoly K f) :=
IsRadical.squarefree (minpoly.ne_zero <| Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral _) <| by
rw [isRadical_iff_span_singleton, span_minpoly_eq_annihilator]; exact hf.annihilator_isRadical
protected theorem IsSemisimple.aeval (p : K[X]) : (aeval f p).IsSemisimple :=
let R := K[X] ⧸ Ideal.span {minpoly K f}
have : Finite K R :=
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' <| minpoly.monic <| Algebra.IsIntegral.isIntegral f).finite
have : IsReduced R := (Ideal.isRadical_iff_quotient_reduced _).mp <|
span_minpoly_eq_annihilator K f ▸ hf.annihilator_isRadical
isSemisimple_of_squarefree_aeval_eq_zero ((minpoly.isRadical K _).squarefree <|
minpoly.ne_zero <| .of_finite K <| Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ K (.span {minpoly K f}) p) <| by
rw [← Ideal.Quotient.liftₐ_comp (.span {minpoly K f}) (aeval f)
fun a h ↦ by rwa [Ideal.span, ← minpoly.ker_aeval_eq_span_minpoly] at h, aeval_algHom,
AlgHom.comp_apply, AlgHom.comp_apply, ← aeval_algHom_apply, minpoly.aeval, map_zero]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Semisimple.lean | 157 | 159 | theorem IsSemisimple.of_mem_adjoin_singleton {a : End K M}
(ha : a ∈ Algebra.adjoin K {f}) : a.IsSemisimple := by |
rw [Algebra.adjoin_singleton_eq_range_aeval] at ha; obtain ⟨p, rfl⟩ := ha; exact .aeval hf _
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Prod
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.OrderOfElement
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
#align_import data.zmod.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"74ad1c88c77e799d2fea62801d1dbbd698cff1b7"
/-!
# Integers mod `n`
Definition of the integers mod n, and the field structure on the integers mod p.
## Definitions
* `ZMod n`, which is for integers modulo a nat `n : ℕ`
* `val a` is defined as a natural number:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
* `valMinAbs` returns the integer closest to zero in the equivalence class.
* A coercion `cast` is defined from `ZMod n` into any ring.
This is a ring hom if the ring has characteristic dividing `n`
-/
assert_not_exists Submodule
open Function
namespace ZMod
instance charZero : CharZero (ZMod 0) := inferInstanceAs (CharZero ℤ)
/-- `val a` is a natural number defined as:
- for `a : ZMod 0` it is the absolute value of `a`
- for `a : ZMod n` with `0 < n` it is the least natural number in the equivalence class
See `ZMod.valMinAbs` for a variant that takes values in the integers.
-/
def val : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → ℕ
| 0 => Int.natAbs
| n + 1 => ((↑) : Fin (n + 1) → ℕ)
#align zmod.val ZMod.val
theorem val_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val < n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
exact Fin.is_lt a
#align zmod.val_lt ZMod.val_lt
theorem val_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : a.val ≤ n :=
a.val_lt.le
#align zmod.val_le ZMod.val_le
@[simp]
theorem val_zero : ∀ {n}, (0 : ZMod n).val = 0
| 0 => rfl
| _ + 1 => rfl
#align zmod.val_zero ZMod.val_zero
@[simp]
theorem val_one' : (1 : ZMod 0).val = 1 :=
rfl
#align zmod.val_one' ZMod.val_one'
@[simp]
theorem val_neg' {n : ZMod 0} : (-n).val = n.val :=
Int.natAbs_neg n
#align zmod.val_neg' ZMod.val_neg'
@[simp]
theorem val_mul' {m n : ZMod 0} : (m * n).val = m.val * n.val :=
Int.natAbs_mul m n
#align zmod.val_mul' ZMod.val_mul'
@[simp]
theorem val_natCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℕ) : (a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
exact Int.natAbs_ofNat a
· apply Fin.val_natCast
#align zmod.val_nat_cast ZMod.val_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast := val_natCast
theorem val_unit' {n : ZMod 0} : IsUnit n ↔ n.val = 1 := by
simp only [val]
rw [Int.isUnit_iff, Int.natAbs_eq_iff, Nat.cast_one]
lemma eq_one_of_isUnit_natCast {n : ℕ} (h : IsUnit (n : ZMod 0)) : n = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.mod_zero n, ← val_natCast, val_unit'.mp h]
theorem val_natCast_of_lt {n a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : ZMod n).val = a := by
rwa [val_natCast, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_nat_cast_of_lt := val_natCast_of_lt
instance charP (n : ℕ) : CharP (ZMod n) n where
cast_eq_zero_iff' := by
intro k
cases' n with n
· simp [zero_dvd_iff, Int.natCast_eq_zero, Nat.zero_eq]
· exact Fin.natCast_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_one (n : ℕ) : addOrderOf (1 : ZMod n) = n :=
CharP.eq _ (CharP.addOrderOf_one _) (ZMod.charP n)
#align zmod.add_order_of_one ZMod.addOrderOf_one
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`. The version
where `a ≠ 0` is `addOrderOf_coe'`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe (a : ℕ) {n : ℕ} (n0 : n ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
cases' a with a
· simp only [Nat.zero_eq, Nat.cast_zero, addOrderOf_zero, Nat.gcd_zero_right,
Nat.pos_of_ne_zero n0, Nat.div_self]
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a.succ_ne_zero, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe ZMod.addOrderOf_coe
/-- This lemma works in the case in which `a ≠ 0`. The version where
`ZMod n` is not infinite, i.e. `n ≠ 0`, is `addOrderOf_coe`. -/
@[simp]
theorem addOrderOf_coe' {a : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (a0 : a ≠ 0) : addOrderOf (a : ZMod n) = n / n.gcd a := by
rw [← Nat.smul_one_eq_cast, addOrderOf_nsmul' _ a0, ZMod.addOrderOf_one]
#align zmod.add_order_of_coe' ZMod.addOrderOf_coe'
/-- We have that `ringChar (ZMod n) = n`. -/
theorem ringChar_zmod_n (n : ℕ) : ringChar (ZMod n) = n := by
rw [ringChar.eq_iff]
exact ZMod.charP n
#align zmod.ring_char_zmod_n ZMod.ringChar_zmod_n
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
theorem natCast_self (n : ℕ) : (n : ZMod n) = 0 :=
CharP.cast_eq_zero (ZMod n) n
#align zmod.nat_cast_self ZMod.natCast_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self := natCast_self
@[simp]
theorem natCast_self' (n : ℕ) : (n + 1 : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, natCast_self (n + 1)]
#align zmod.nat_cast_self' ZMod.natCast_self'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_self' := natCast_self'
section UniversalProperty
variable {n : ℕ} {R : Type*}
section
variable [AddGroupWithOne R]
/-- Cast an integer modulo `n` to another semiring.
This function is a morphism if the characteristic of `R` divides `n`.
See `ZMod.castHom` for a bundled version. -/
def cast : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ZMod n → R
| 0 => Int.cast
| _ + 1 => fun i => i.val
#align zmod.cast ZMod.cast
@[simp]
theorem cast_zero : (cast (0 : ZMod n) : R) = 0 := by
delta ZMod.cast
cases n
· exact Int.cast_zero
· simp
#align zmod.cast_zero ZMod.cast_zero
theorem cast_eq_val [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R) = a.val := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.cast_eq_val ZMod.cast_eq_val
variable {S : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne S]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.fst_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).fst = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.fst_zmod_cast Prod.fst_zmod_cast
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.snd_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : (cast a : R × S).snd = cast a := by
cases n
· rfl
· simp [ZMod.cast]
#align prod.snd_zmod_cast Prod.snd_zmod_cast
end
/-- So-named because the coercion is `Nat.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Nat.cast` into an arbitrary ring,
see `ZMod.natCast_val`. -/
theorem natCast_zmod_val {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : ZMod n) : (a.val : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.cast_val_eq_self
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_val ZMod.natCast_zmod_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_val := natCast_zmod_val
theorem natCast_rightInverse [NeZero n] : Function.RightInverse val ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_zmod_val
#align zmod.nat_cast_right_inverse ZMod.natCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_rightInverse := natCast_rightInverse
theorem natCast_zmod_surjective [NeZero n] : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) :=
natCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.nat_cast_zmod_surjective ZMod.natCast_zmod_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_surjective := natCast_zmod_surjective
/-- So-named because the outer coercion is `Int.cast` into `ZMod`. For `Int.cast` into an arbitrary
ring, see `ZMod.intCast_cast`. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem intCast_zmod_cast (a : ZMod n) : ((cast a : ℤ) : ZMod n) = a := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
· dsimp [ZMod.cast, ZMod]
erw [Int.cast_natCast, Fin.cast_val_eq_self]
#align zmod.int_cast_zmod_cast ZMod.intCast_zmod_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_cast := intCast_zmod_cast
theorem intCast_rightInverse : Function.RightInverse (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_zmod_cast
#align zmod.int_cast_right_inverse ZMod.intCast_rightInverse
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_rightInverse := intCast_rightInverse
theorem intCast_surjective : Function.Surjective ((↑) : ℤ → ZMod n) :=
intCast_rightInverse.surjective
#align zmod.int_cast_surjective ZMod.intCast_surjective
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_surjective := intCast_surjective
theorem cast_id : ∀ (n) (i : ZMod n), (ZMod.cast i : ZMod n) = i
| 0, _ => Int.cast_id
| _ + 1, i => natCast_zmod_val i
#align zmod.cast_id ZMod.cast_id
@[simp]
theorem cast_id' : (ZMod.cast : ZMod n → ZMod n) = id :=
funext (cast_id n)
#align zmod.cast_id' ZMod.cast_id'
variable (R) [Ring R]
/-- The coercions are respectively `Nat.cast` and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem natCast_comp_val [NeZero n] : ((↑) : ℕ → R) ∘ (val : ZMod n → ℕ) = cast := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
rfl
#align zmod.nat_cast_comp_val ZMod.natCast_comp_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_comp_val := natCast_comp_val
/-- The coercions are respectively `Int.cast`, `ZMod.cast`, and `ZMod.cast`. -/
@[simp]
theorem intCast_comp_cast : ((↑) : ℤ → R) ∘ (cast : ZMod n → ℤ) = cast := by
cases n
· exact congr_arg (Int.cast ∘ ·) ZMod.cast_id'
· ext
simp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
#align zmod.int_cast_comp_cast ZMod.intCast_comp_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_comp_cast := intCast_comp_cast
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem natCast_val [NeZero n] (i : ZMod n) : (i.val : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (natCast_comp_val R) i
#align zmod.nat_cast_val ZMod.natCast_val
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_val := natCast_val
@[simp]
theorem intCast_cast (i : ZMod n) : ((cast i : ℤ) : R) = cast i :=
congr_fun (intCast_comp_cast R) i
#align zmod.int_cast_cast ZMod.intCast_cast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_cast := intCast_cast
theorem cast_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) :
(cast (a + b) : ℤ) =
if (n : ℤ) ≤ cast a + cast b then (cast a + cast b - n : ℤ) else cast a + cast b := by
cases' n with n
· simp; rfl
change Fin (n + 1) at a b
change ((((a + b) : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) : ℤ) = if ((n + 1 : ℕ) : ℤ) ≤ (a : ℕ) + b then _ else _
simp only [Fin.val_add_eq_ite, Int.ofNat_succ, Int.ofNat_le]
norm_cast
split_ifs with h
· rw [Nat.cast_sub h]
congr
· rfl
#align zmod.coe_add_eq_ite ZMod.cast_add_eq_ite
section CharDvd
/-! If the characteristic of `R` divides `n`, then `cast` is a homomorphism. -/
variable {m : ℕ} [CharP R m]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one (h : m ∣ n) : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 := by
cases' n with n
· exact Int.cast_one
show ((1 % (n + 1) : ℕ) : R) = 1
cases n;
· rw [Nat.dvd_one] at h
subst m
have : Subsingleton R := CharP.CharOne.subsingleton
apply Subsingleton.elim
rw [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
· exact Nat.cast_one
exact Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ rfl
#align zmod.cast_one ZMod.cast_one
theorem cast_add (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_add
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
erw [← Nat.cast_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
#align zmod.cast_add ZMod.cast_add
theorem cast_mul (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b := by
cases n
· apply Int.cast_mul
symm
dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
erw [← Nat.cast_mul, ← sub_eq_zero, ← Nat.cast_sub (Nat.mod_le _ _),
@CharP.cast_eq_zero_iff R _ m]
exact h.trans (Nat.dvd_sub_mod _)
#align zmod.cast_mul ZMod.cast_mul
/-- The canonical ring homomorphism from `ZMod n` to a ring of characteristic dividing `n`.
See also `ZMod.lift` for a generalized version working in `AddGroup`s.
-/
def castHom (h : m ∣ n) (R : Type*) [Ring R] [CharP R m] : ZMod n →+* R where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := cast_zero
map_one' := cast_one h
map_add' := cast_add h
map_mul' := cast_mul h
#align zmod.cast_hom ZMod.castHom
@[simp]
theorem castHom_apply {h : m ∣ n} (i : ZMod n) : castHom h R i = cast i :=
rfl
#align zmod.cast_hom_apply ZMod.castHom_apply
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub (h : m ∣ n) (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
(castHom h R).map_sub a b
#align zmod.cast_sub ZMod.cast_sub
@[simp]
theorem cast_neg (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) : (cast (-a : ZMod n) : R) = -(cast a) :=
(castHom h R).map_neg a
#align zmod.cast_neg ZMod.cast_neg
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow (h : m ∣ n) (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a) ^ k :=
(castHom h R).map_pow a k
#align zmod.cast_pow ZMod.cast_pow
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_natCast (castHom h R) k
#align zmod.cast_nat_cast ZMod.cast_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias cast_nat_cast := cast_natCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast (h : m ∣ n) (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
map_intCast (castHom h R) k
#align zmod.cast_int_cast ZMod.cast_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias cast_int_cast := cast_intCast
end CharDvd
section CharEq
/-! Some specialised simp lemmas which apply when `R` has characteristic `n`. -/
variable [CharP R n]
@[simp]
theorem cast_one' : (cast (1 : ZMod n) : R) = 1 :=
cast_one dvd_rfl
#align zmod.cast_one' ZMod.cast_one'
@[simp]
theorem cast_add' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a + b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a + cast b :=
cast_add dvd_rfl a b
#align zmod.cast_add' ZMod.cast_add'
@[simp]
theorem cast_mul' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a * b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a * cast b :=
cast_mul dvd_rfl a b
#align zmod.cast_mul' ZMod.cast_mul'
@[simp]
theorem cast_sub' (a b : ZMod n) : (cast (a - b : ZMod n) : R) = cast a - cast b :=
cast_sub dvd_rfl a b
#align zmod.cast_sub' ZMod.cast_sub'
@[simp]
theorem cast_pow' (a : ZMod n) (k : ℕ) : (cast (a ^ k : ZMod n) : R) = (cast a : R) ^ k :=
cast_pow dvd_rfl a k
#align zmod.cast_pow' ZMod.cast_pow'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast' (k : ℕ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_natCast dvd_rfl k
#align zmod.cast_nat_cast' ZMod.cast_natCast'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias cast_nat_cast' := cast_natCast'
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_intCast' (k : ℤ) : (cast (k : ZMod n) : R) = k :=
cast_intCast dvd_rfl k
#align zmod.cast_int_cast' ZMod.cast_intCast'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias cast_int_cast' := cast_intCast'
variable (R)
theorem castHom_injective : Function.Injective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
rw [injective_iff_map_eq_zero]
intro x
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := ZMod.intCast_surjective x
rw [map_intCast, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff R n, CharP.intCast_eq_zero_iff (ZMod n) n]
exact id
#align zmod.cast_hom_injective ZMod.castHom_injective
theorem castHom_bijective [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) :
Function.Bijective (ZMod.castHom (dvd_refl n) R) := by
haveI : NeZero n :=
⟨by
intro hn
rw [hn] at h
exact (Fintype.card_eq_zero_iff.mp h).elim' 0⟩
rw [Fintype.bijective_iff_injective_and_card, ZMod.card, h, eq_self_iff_true, and_true_iff]
apply ZMod.castHom_injective
#align zmod.cast_hom_bijective ZMod.castHom_bijective
/-- The unique ring isomorphism between `ZMod n` and a ring `R`
of characteristic `n` and cardinality `n`. -/
noncomputable def ringEquiv [Fintype R] (h : Fintype.card R = n) : ZMod n ≃+* R :=
RingEquiv.ofBijective _ (ZMod.castHom_bijective R h)
#align zmod.ring_equiv ZMod.ringEquiv
/-- The identity between `ZMod m` and `ZMod n` when `m = n`, as a ring isomorphism. -/
def ringEquivCongr {m n : ℕ} (h : m = n) : ZMod m ≃+* ZMod n := by
cases' m with m <;> cases' n with n
· exact RingEquiv.refl _
· exfalso
exact n.succ_ne_zero h.symm
· exfalso
exact m.succ_ne_zero h
· exact
{ finCongr h with
map_mul' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_mul, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h]
map_add' := fun a b => by
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
rw [Fin.coe_cast, Fin.val_add, Fin.val_add, Fin.coe_cast, Fin.coe_cast, ← h] }
#align zmod.ring_equiv_congr ZMod.ringEquivCongr
@[simp] lemma ringEquivCongr_refl (a : ℕ) : ringEquivCongr (rfl : a = a) = .refl _ := by
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_refl_apply {a : ℕ} (x : ZMod a) : ringEquivCongr rfl x = x := by
rw [ringEquivCongr_refl]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_symm {a b : ℕ} (hab : a = b) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).symm = ringEquivCongr hab.symm := by
subst hab
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_trans {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) :
(ringEquivCongr hab).trans (ringEquivCongr hbc) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) := by
subst hab hbc
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_ringEquivCongr_apply {a b c : ℕ} (hab : a = b) (hbc : b = c) (x : ZMod a) :
ringEquivCongr hbc (ringEquivCongr hab x) = ringEquivCongr (hab.trans hbc) x := by
rw [← ringEquivCongr_trans hab hbc]
rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_val {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (x : ZMod a) :
ZMod.val ((ZMod.ringEquivCongr h) x) = ZMod.val x := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
lemma ringEquivCongr_intCast {a b : ℕ} (h : a = b) (z : ℤ) :
ZMod.ringEquivCongr h z = z := by
subst h
cases a <;> rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_ringEquivCongr := ringEquivCongr_intCast
end CharEq
end UniversalProperty
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [ZMOD c] :=
CharP.intCast_eq_intCast (ZMod c) c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff := intCast_eq_intCast_iff
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff' (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff' ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff' := intCast_eq_intCast_iff'
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a ≡ b [MOD c] := by
simpa [Int.natCast_modEq_iff] using ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff := natCast_eq_natCast_iff
theorem natCast_eq_natCast_iff' (a b c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = (b : ZMod c) ↔ a % c = b % c :=
ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff a b c
#align zmod.nat_coe_eq_nat_coe_iff' ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_eq_nat_cast_iff' := natCast_eq_natCast_iff'
theorem intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ (b : ℤ) ∣ a := by
rw [← Int.cast_zero, ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub (a b : ℤ) (c : ℕ) : (a : ZMod c) = ↑b ↔ ↑c ∣ b - a := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff, Int.modEq_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.int_coe_eq_int_coe_iff_dvd_sub ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_eq_int_cast_iff_dvd_sub := intCast_eq_intCast_iff_dvd_sub
theorem natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd (a b : ℕ) : (a : ZMod b) = 0 ↔ b ∣ a := by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ZMod.natCast_eq_natCast_iff, Nat.modEq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd := natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd
theorem val_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) [NeZero n] : ↑(a : ZMod n).val = a % n := by
have hle : (0 : ℤ) ≤ ↑(a : ZMod n).val := Int.natCast_nonneg _
have hlt : ↑(a : ZMod n).val < (n : ℤ) := Int.ofNat_lt.mpr (ZMod.val_lt a)
refine (Int.emod_eq_of_lt hle hlt).symm.trans ?_
rw [← ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff', Int.cast_natCast, ZMod.natCast_val, ZMod.cast_id]
#align zmod.val_int_cast ZMod.val_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias val_int_cast := val_intCast
theorem coe_intCast {n : ℕ} (a : ℤ) : cast (a : ZMod n) = a % n := by
cases n
· rw [Int.ofNat_zero, Int.emod_zero, Int.cast_id]; rfl
· rw [← val_intCast, val]; rfl
#align zmod.coe_int_cast ZMod.coe_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias coe_int_cast := coe_intCast
@[simp]
theorem val_neg_one (n : ℕ) : (-1 : ZMod n.succ).val = n := by
dsimp [val, Fin.coe_neg]
cases n
· simp [Nat.mod_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Fin.coe_neg_one]
#align zmod.val_neg_one ZMod.val_neg_one
/-- `-1 : ZMod n` lifts to `n - 1 : R`. This avoids the characteristic assumption in `cast_neg`. -/
theorem cast_neg_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] (n : ℕ) : cast (-1 : ZMod n) = (n - 1 : R) := by
cases' n with n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]; simp
· rw [← natCast_val, val_neg_one, Nat.cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]
#align zmod.cast_neg_one ZMod.cast_neg_one
theorem cast_sub_one {R : Type*} [Ring R] {n : ℕ} (k : ZMod n) :
(cast (k - 1 : ZMod n) : R) = (if k = 0 then (n : R) else cast k) - 1 := by
split_ifs with hk
· rw [hk, zero_sub, ZMod.cast_neg_one]
· cases n
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast]
rw [Int.cast_sub, Int.cast_one]
· dsimp [ZMod, ZMod.cast, ZMod.val]
rw [Fin.coe_sub_one, if_neg]
· rw [Nat.cast_sub, Nat.cast_one]
rwa [Fin.ext_iff, Fin.val_zero, ← Ne, ← Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero] at hk
· exact hk
#align zmod.cast_sub_one ZMod.cast_sub_one
theorem natCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_natCast, Nat.mod_add_div]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Nat.cast_add, natCast_zmod_val, Nat.cast_mul, natCast_self, zero_mul,
add_zero]
#align zmod.nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.natCast_eq_iff
theorem intCast_eq_iff (p : ℕ) (n : ℤ) (z : ZMod p) [NeZero p] :
↑n = z ↔ ∃ k, n = z.val + p * k := by
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine ⟨n / p, ?_⟩
rw [val_intCast, Int.emod_add_ediv]
· rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [Int.cast_add, Int.cast_mul, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast, natCast_val,
ZMod.natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero, cast_id]
#align zmod.int_coe_zmod_eq_iff ZMod.intCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias nat_coe_zmod_eq_iff := natCast_eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-05-25")] alias int_coe_zmod_eq_iff := intCast_eq_iff
@[push_cast, simp]
theorem intCast_mod (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ((a % b : ℤ) : ZMod b) = (a : ZMod b) := by
rw [ZMod.intCast_eq_intCast_iff]
apply Int.mod_modEq
#align zmod.int_cast_mod ZMod.intCast_mod
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias int_cast_mod := intCast_mod
theorem ker_intCastAddHom (n : ℕ) :
(Int.castAddHom (ZMod n)).ker = AddSubgroup.zmultiples (n : ℤ) := by
ext
rw [Int.mem_zmultiples_iff, AddMonoidHom.mem_ker, Int.coe_castAddHom,
intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd]
#align zmod.ker_int_cast_add_hom ZMod.ker_intCastAddHom
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias ker_int_castAddHom := ker_intCastAddHom
theorem cast_injective_of_le {m n : ℕ} [nzm : NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) :
Function.Injective (@cast (ZMod n) _ m) := by
cases m with
| zero => cases nzm; simp_all
| succ m =>
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ f
simp only [cast, val, natCast_eq_natCast_iff',
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hx.trans_le h), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (hy.trans_le h)] at f
apply Fin.ext
exact f
theorem cast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_of_le {m n : ℕ} [NeZero m] (h : m ≤ n) (a : ZMod m) :
(cast a : ZMod n) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [← ZMod.cast_zero (n := m)]
exact Injective.eq_iff' (cast_injective_of_le h) rfl
-- Porting note: commented
-- unseal Int.NonNeg
@[simp]
theorem natCast_toNat (p : ℕ) : ∀ {z : ℤ} (_h : 0 ≤ z), (z.toNat : ZMod p) = z
| (n : ℕ), _h => by simp only [Int.cast_natCast, Int.toNat_natCast]
| Int.negSucc n, h => by simp at h
#align zmod.nat_cast_to_nat ZMod.natCast_toNat
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_toNat := natCast_toNat
theorem val_injective (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : Function.Injective (val : ZMod n → ℕ) := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
intro a b h
dsimp [ZMod]
ext
exact h
#align zmod.val_injective ZMod.val_injective
theorem val_one_eq_one_mod (n : ℕ) : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 % n := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one, val_natCast]
#align zmod.val_one_eq_one_mod ZMod.val_one_eq_one_mod
theorem val_one (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : (1 : ZMod n).val = 1 := by
rw [val_one_eq_one_mod]
exact Nat.mod_eq_of_lt Fact.out
#align zmod.val_one ZMod.val_one
theorem val_add {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val = (a.val + b.val) % n := by
cases n
· cases NeZero.ne 0 rfl
· apply Fin.val_add
#align zmod.val_add ZMod.val_add
theorem val_add_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
have : NeZero n := by constructor; rintro rfl; simp at h
rw [ZMod.val_add, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h]
theorem val_add_val_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
a.val + b.val = (a + b).val + n := by
rw [val_add, Nat.add_mod_add_of_le_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
rwa [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _), Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (val_lt _)]
theorem val_add_of_le {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a b : ZMod n} (h : n ≤ a.val + b.val) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val - n := by
rw [val_add_val_of_le h]
exact eq_tsub_of_add_eq rfl
theorem val_add_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a + b).val ≤ a.val + b.val := by
cases n
· simp [ZMod.val]; apply Int.natAbs_add_le
· simp [ZMod.val_add]; apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val = a.val * b.val % n := by
cases n
· rw [Nat.mod_zero]
apply Int.natAbs_mul
· apply Fin.val_mul
#align zmod.val_mul ZMod.val_mul
theorem val_mul_le {n : ℕ} (a b : ZMod n) : (a * b).val ≤ a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_le
theorem val_mul_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : ZMod n} (h : a.val * b.val < n) :
(a * b).val = a.val * b.val := by
rw [val_mul]
apply Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
instance nontrivial (n : ℕ) [Fact (1 < n)] : Nontrivial (ZMod n) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, fun h =>
zero_ne_one <|
calc
0 = (0 : ZMod n).val := by rw [val_zero]
_ = (1 : ZMod n).val := congr_arg ZMod.val h
_ = 1 := val_one n
⟩⟩
#align zmod.nontrivial ZMod.nontrivial
instance nontrivial' : Nontrivial (ZMod 0) := by
delta ZMod; infer_instance
#align zmod.nontrivial' ZMod.nontrivial'
/-- The inversion on `ZMod n`.
It is setup in such a way that `a * a⁻¹` is equal to `gcd a.val n`.
In particular, if `a` is coprime to `n`, and hence a unit, `a * a⁻¹ = 1`. -/
def inv : ∀ n : ℕ, ZMod n → ZMod n
| 0, i => Int.sign i
| n + 1, i => Nat.gcdA i.val (n + 1)
#align zmod.inv ZMod.inv
instance (n : ℕ) : Inv (ZMod n) :=
⟨inv n⟩
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem inv_zero : ∀ n : ℕ, (0 : ZMod n)⁻¹ = 0
| 0 => Int.sign_zero
| n + 1 =>
show (Nat.gcdA _ (n + 1) : ZMod (n + 1)) = 0 by
rw [val_zero]
unfold Nat.gcdA Nat.xgcd Nat.xgcdAux
rfl
#align zmod.inv_zero ZMod.inv_zero
theorem mul_inv_eq_gcd {n : ℕ} (a : ZMod n) : a * a⁻¹ = Nat.gcd a.val n := by
cases' n with n
· dsimp [ZMod] at a ⊢
calc
_ = a * Int.sign a := rfl
_ = a.natAbs := by rw [Int.mul_sign]
_ = a.natAbs.gcd 0 := by rw [Nat.gcd_zero_right]
· calc
a * a⁻¹ = a * a⁻¹ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ := by
rw [natCast_self, zero_mul, add_zero]
_ = ↑(↑a.val * Nat.gcdA (val a) n.succ + n.succ * Nat.gcdB (val a) n.succ) := by
push_cast
rw [natCast_zmod_val]
rfl
_ = Nat.gcd a.val n.succ := by rw [← Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab a.val n.succ]; rfl
#align zmod.mul_inv_eq_gcd ZMod.mul_inv_eq_gcd
@[simp]
theorem natCast_mod (a : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : ((a % n : ℕ) : ZMod n) = a := by
conv =>
rhs
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div a n]
simp
#align zmod.nat_cast_mod ZMod.natCast_mod
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias nat_cast_mod := natCast_mod
theorem eq_iff_modEq_nat (n : ℕ) {a b : ℕ} : (a : ZMod n) = b ↔ a ≡ b [MOD n] := by
cases n
· simp [Nat.ModEq, Int.natCast_inj, Nat.mod_zero]
· rw [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.ModEq, ← val_natCast, ← val_natCast]
exact Iff.rfl
#align zmod.eq_iff_modeq_nat ZMod.eq_iff_modEq_nat
theorem coe_mul_inv_eq_one {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
((x : ZMod n) * (x : ZMod n)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [Nat.Coprime, Nat.gcd_comm, Nat.gcd_rec] at h
rw [mul_inv_eq_gcd, val_natCast, h, Nat.cast_one]
#align zmod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one ZMod.coe_mul_inv_eq_one
/-- `unitOfCoprime` makes an element of `(ZMod n)ˣ` given
a natural number `x` and a proof that `x` is coprime to `n` -/
def unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) : (ZMod n)ˣ :=
⟨x, x⁻¹, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h, by rw [mul_comm, coe_mul_inv_eq_one x h]⟩
#align zmod.unit_of_coprime ZMod.unitOfCoprime
@[simp]
theorem coe_unitOfCoprime {n : ℕ} (x : ℕ) (h : Nat.Coprime x n) :
(unitOfCoprime x h : ZMod n) = x :=
rfl
#align zmod.coe_unit_of_coprime ZMod.coe_unitOfCoprime
theorem val_coe_unit_coprime {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : Nat.Coprime (u : ZMod n).val n := by
cases' n with n
· rcases Int.units_eq_one_or u with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp
apply Nat.coprime_of_mul_modEq_one ((u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1)).val
have := Units.ext_iff.1 (mul_right_inv u)
rw [Units.val_one] at this
rw [← eq_iff_modEq_nat, Nat.cast_one, ← this]; clear this
rw [← natCast_zmod_val ((u * u⁻¹ : Units (ZMod (n + 1))) : ZMod (n + 1))]
rw [Units.val_mul, val_mul, natCast_mod]
#align zmod.val_coe_unit_coprime ZMod.val_coe_unit_coprime
lemma isUnit_iff_coprime (m n : ℕ) : IsUnit (m : ZMod n) ↔ m.Coprime n := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ (unitOfCoprime m H).isUnit⟩
have H' := val_coe_unit_coprime H.unit
rw [IsUnit.unit_spec, val_natCast m, Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one] at H'
rw [Nat.coprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Nat.gcd_comm, ← H']
exact Nat.gcd_rec n m
lemma isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) ↔ ¬p ∣ n := by
rw [isUnit_iff_coprime, Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hp]
lemma isUnit_prime_of_not_dvd {n p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) (h : ¬ p ∣ n) : IsUnit (p : ZMod n) :=
(isUnit_prime_iff_not_dvd hp).mpr h
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/ZMod/Basic.lean | 896 | 904 | theorem inv_coe_unit {n : ℕ} (u : (ZMod n)ˣ) : (u : ZMod n)⁻¹ = (u⁻¹ : (ZMod n)ˣ) := by |
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℕ → ZMod n) (val_coe_unit_coprime u)
rw [← mul_inv_eq_gcd, Nat.cast_one] at this
let u' : (ZMod n)ˣ := ⟨u, (u : ZMod n)⁻¹, this, by rwa [mul_comm]⟩
have h : u = u' := by
apply Units.ext
rfl
rw [h]
rfl
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
#align_import analysis.special_functions.pow.real from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"4fa54b337f7d52805480306db1b1439c741848c8"
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Real ComplexConjugate
open Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
#align real.rpow Real.rpow
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
#align real.rpow_eq_pow Real.rpow_eq_pow
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
#align real.rpow_def Real.rpow_def
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul, -RCLike.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonneg Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
#align real.rpow_def_of_pos Real.rpow_def_of_pos
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
#align real.exp_mul Real.exp_mul
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
#align real.rpow_int_cast Real.rpow_intCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_int_cast := rpow_intCast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
#align real.rpow_nat_cast Real.rpow_natCast
@[deprecated (since := "2024-04-17")]
alias rpow_nat_cast := rpow_natCast
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
#align real.exp_one_rpow Real.exp_one_rpow
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
#align real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, abs_of_neg hx, Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.abs_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
#align real.rpow_def_of_neg Real.rpow_def_of_neg
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
#align real.rpow_def_of_nonpos Real.rpow_def_of_nonpos
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
#align real.rpow_pos_of_pos Real.rpow_pos_of_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
#align real.rpow_zero Real.rpow_zero
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 131 | 131 | theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by | simp [rpow_def, *]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Casper Putz, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Order
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.StdBasis
#align_import linear_algebra.matrix.dot_product from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"31c24aa72e7b3e5ed97a8412470e904f82b81004"
/-!
# Dot product of two vectors
This file contains some results on the map `Matrix.dotProduct`, which maps two
vectors `v w : n → R` to the sum of the entrywise products `v i * w i`.
## Main results
* `Matrix.dotProduct_stdBasis_one`: the dot product of `v` with the `i`th
standard basis vector is `v i`
* `Matrix.dotProduct_eq_zero_iff`: if `v`'s' dot product with all `w` is zero,
then `v` is zero
## Tags
matrix, reindex
-/
variable {m n p R : Type*}
namespace Matrix
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [Fintype n]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_stdBasis_eq_mul [DecidableEq n] (v : n → R) (c : R) (i : n) :
dotProduct v (LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i c) = v i * c := by
rw [dotProduct, Finset.sum_eq_single i, LinearMap.stdBasis_same]
· exact fun _ _ hb => by rw [LinearMap.stdBasis_ne _ _ _ _ hb, mul_zero]
· exact fun hi => False.elim (hi <| Finset.mem_univ _)
#align matrix.dot_product_std_basis_eq_mul Matrix.dotProduct_stdBasis_eq_mul
-- @[simp] -- Porting note (#10618): simp can prove this
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/DotProduct.lean | 49 | 51 | theorem dotProduct_stdBasis_one [DecidableEq n] (v : n → R) (i : n) :
dotProduct v (LinearMap.stdBasis R (fun _ => R) i 1) = v i := by |
rw [dotProduct_stdBasis_eq_mul, mul_one]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Andrew Yang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.CommSq
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.StrictInitial
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Types
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Pullbacks
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.FunctorCategory
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Constructions.FiniteProductsOfBinaryProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.VanKampen
#align_import category_theory.extensive from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"178a32653e369dce2da68dc6b2694e385d484ef1"
/-!
# Extensive categories
## Main definitions
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive`: A category is (finitary) extensive if it has finite
coproducts, and binary coproducts are van Kampen.
## Main Results
- `CategoryTheory.hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryExtensive`: The initial object
in extensive categories is strict.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit`: Coproduct injections are monic in
extensive categories.
- `CategoryTheory.BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen`: In extensive categories,
sums are disjoint, i.e. the pullback of `X ⟶ X ⨿ Y` and `Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y` is the initial object.
- `CategoryTheory.types.finitaryExtensive`: The category of types is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive_TopCat`:
The category `Top` is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive_functor`: The category `C ⥤ D` is extensive if `D`
has all pullbacks and is extensive.
- `CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.isVanKampen_finiteCoproducts`: Finite coproducts in a
finitary extensive category are van Kampen.
## TODO
Show that the following are finitary extensive:
- `Scheme`
- `AffineScheme` (`CommRingᵒᵖ`)
## References
- https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/extensive+category
- [Carboni et al, Introduction to extensive and distributive categories][CARBONI1993145]
-/
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
universe v' u' v u v'' u''
variable {J : Type v'} [Category.{u'} J] {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C]
variable {D : Type u''} [Category.{v''} D]
section Extensive
variable {X Y : C}
/-- A category has pullback of inclusions if it has all pullbacks along coproduct injections. -/
class HasPullbacksOfInclusions (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasBinaryCoproducts C] : Prop where
[hasPullbackInl : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y), HasPullback coprod.inl f]
attribute [instance] HasPullbacksOfInclusions.hasPullbackInl
/--
A functor preserves pullback of inclusions if it preserves all pullbacks along coproduct injections.
-/
class PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
(F : C ⥤ D) [HasBinaryCoproducts C] where
[preservesPullbackInl : ∀ {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y), PreservesLimit (cospan coprod.inl f) F]
attribute [instance] PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions.preservesPullbackInl
/-- A category is (finitary) pre-extensive if it has finite coproducts,
and binary coproducts are universal. -/
class FinitaryPreExtensive (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
[hasFiniteCoproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[hasPullbacksOfInclusions : HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
/-- In a finitary extensive category, all coproducts are van Kampen-/
universal' : ∀ {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y), IsColimit c → IsUniversalColimit c
attribute [instance] FinitaryPreExtensive.hasFiniteCoproducts
attribute [instance] FinitaryPreExtensive.hasPullbacksOfInclusions
/-- A category is (finitary) extensive if it has finite coproducts,
and binary coproducts are van Kampen. -/
class FinitaryExtensive (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] : Prop where
[hasFiniteCoproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[hasPullbacksOfInclusions : HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
/-- In a finitary extensive category, all coproducts are van Kampen-/
van_kampen' : ∀ {X Y : C} (c : BinaryCofan X Y), IsColimit c → IsVanKampenColimit c
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive
attribute [instance] FinitaryExtensive.hasFiniteCoproducts
attribute [instance] FinitaryExtensive.hasPullbacksOfInclusions
theorem FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen [FinitaryExtensive C] {F : Discrete WalkingPair ⥤ C}
(c : Cocone F) (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
let X := F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.left⟩
let Y := F.obj ⟨WalkingPair.right⟩
have : F = pair X Y := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp
clear_value X Y
subst this
exact FinitaryExtensive.van_kampen' c hc
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.van_kampen CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen
namespace HasPullbacksOfInclusions
instance (priority := 100) [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [HasPullbacks C] :
HasPullbacksOfInclusions C := ⟨⟩
variable [HasBinaryCoproducts C] [HasPullbacksOfInclusions C] {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y)
instance preservesPullbackInl' :
HasPullback f coprod.inl :=
hasPullback_symmetry _ _
instance hasPullbackInr' :
HasPullback f coprod.inr := by
have : IsPullback (𝟙 _) (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) f (coprod.braiding Y X).hom :=
IsPullback.of_horiz_isIso ⟨by simp⟩
have := (IsPullback.of_hasPullback (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) coprod.inl).paste_horiz this
simp only [coprod.braiding_hom, Category.comp_id, colimit.ι_desc, BinaryCofan.mk_pt,
BinaryCofan.ι_app_left, BinaryCofan.mk_inl] at this
exact ⟨⟨⟨_, this.isLimit⟩⟩⟩
instance hasPullbackInr :
HasPullback coprod.inr f :=
hasPullback_symmetry _ _
end HasPullbacksOfInclusions
namespace PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions
variable {D : Type*} [Category D] [HasBinaryCoproducts C] (F : C ⥤ D)
noncomputable
instance (priority := 100) [PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F] :
PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions F := ⟨⟩
variable [PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions F] {X Y Z : C} (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y)
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInl' :
PreservesLimit (cospan f coprod.inl) F :=
preservesPullbackSymmetry _ _ _
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInr' :
PreservesLimit (cospan f coprod.inr) F := by
apply preservesLimitOfIsoDiagram (K₁ := cospan (f ≫ (coprod.braiding X Y).hom) coprod.inl)
apply cospanExt (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (coprod.braiding X Y).symm <;> simp
noncomputable
instance preservesPullbackInr :
PreservesLimit (cospan coprod.inr f) F :=
preservesPullbackSymmetry _ _ _
end PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions
instance (priority := 100) FinitaryExtensive.toFinitaryPreExtensive [FinitaryExtensive C] :
FinitaryPreExtensive C :=
⟨fun c hc ↦ (FinitaryExtensive.van_kampen' c hc).isUniversal⟩
theorem FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit [FinitaryExtensive C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(hc : IsColimit c) : Mono c.inr :=
BinaryCofan.mono_inr_of_isVanKampen (FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen c hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.mono_inr_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit
theorem FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit [FinitaryExtensive C] {c : BinaryCofan X Y}
(hc : IsColimit c) : Mono c.inl :=
FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit (BinaryCofan.isColimitFlip hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.mono_inl_of_is_colimit CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit
instance [FinitaryExtensive C] (X Y : C) : Mono (coprod.inl : X ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
(FinitaryExtensive.mono_inl_of_isColimit (coprodIsCoprod X Y) : _)
instance [FinitaryExtensive C] (X Y : C) : Mono (coprod.inr : Y ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :=
(FinitaryExtensive.mono_inr_of_isColimit (coprodIsCoprod X Y) : _)
theorem FinitaryExtensive.isPullback_initial_to_binaryCofan [FinitaryExtensive C]
{c : BinaryCofan X Y} (hc : IsColimit c) :
IsPullback (initial.to _) (initial.to _) c.inl c.inr :=
BinaryCofan.isPullback_initial_to_of_isVanKampen (FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen c hc)
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive.is_pullback_initial_to_binary_cofan CategoryTheory.FinitaryExtensive.isPullback_initial_to_binaryCofan
instance (priority := 100) hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryPreExtensive
[FinitaryPreExtensive C] : HasStrictInitialObjects C :=
hasStrictInitial_of_isUniversal (FinitaryPreExtensive.universal' _
((BinaryCofan.isColimit_iff_isIso_inr initialIsInitial _).mpr (by
dsimp
infer_instance)).some)
#align category_theory.has_strict_initial_objects_of_finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.hasStrictInitialObjects_of_finitaryPreExtensive
theorem finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C] [HasFiniteCoproducts C]
[HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
(T : C) (HT : IsTerminal T) (c₀ : BinaryCofan T T) (hc₀ : IsColimit c₀) :
FinitaryExtensive C ↔ IsVanKampenColimit c₀ := by
refine ⟨fun H => H.van_kampen' c₀ hc₀, fun H => ?_⟩
constructor
simp_rw [BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_iff] at H ⊢
intro X Y c hc X' Y' c' αX αY f hX hY
obtain ⟨d, hd, hd'⟩ :=
Limits.BinaryCofan.IsColimit.desc' hc (HT.from _ ≫ c₀.inl) (HT.from _ ≫ c₀.inr)
rw [H c' (αX ≫ HT.from _) (αY ≫ HT.from _) (f ≫ d) (by rw [← reassoc_of% hX, hd, Category.assoc])
(by rw [← reassoc_of% hY, hd', Category.assoc])]
obtain ⟨hl, hr⟩ := (H c (HT.from _) (HT.from _) d hd.symm hd'.symm).mp ⟨hc⟩
rw [hl.paste_vert_iff hX.symm, hr.paste_vert_iff hY.symm]
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_iff_of_is_terminal CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal
instance types.finitaryExtensive : FinitaryExtensive (Type u) := by
classical
rw [finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal (Type u) PUnit Types.isTerminalPunit _
(Types.binaryCoproductColimit _ _)]
apply BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk _ _ (fun X Y => Types.binaryCoproductColimit X Y) _
fun f g => (Limits.Types.pullbackLimitCone f g).2
· intros _ _ _ _ f hαX hαY
constructor
· refine ⟨⟨hαX.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inl y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· simp only [Types.binaryCoproductCocone_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj, Sum.inl.injEq,
exists_unique_eq']
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((congr_fun s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans (congr_fun hαY val : _).symm
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
exact ⟨l, (funext hl).symm, Types.isTerminalPunit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => funext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (congr_fun h₁ x).symm⟩
· refine ⟨⟨hαY.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inr y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((congr_fun s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans (congr_fun hαX val : _).symm
· simp only [Types.binaryCoproductCocone_pt, Functor.const_obj_obj, Sum.inr.injEq,
exists_unique_eq']
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
exact ⟨l, (funext hl).symm, Types.isTerminalPunit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => funext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (congr_fun h₁ x).symm⟩
· intro Z f
dsimp [Limits.Types.binaryCoproductCocone]
delta Types.PullbackObj
have : ∀ x, f x = Sum.inl PUnit.unit ∨ f x = Sum.inr PUnit.unit := by
intro x
rcases f x with (⟨⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨⟩⟩)
exacts [Or.inl rfl, Or.inr rfl]
let eX : { p : Z × PUnit // f p.fst = Sum.inl p.snd } ≃ { x : Z // f x = Sum.inl PUnit.unit } :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, by convert p.2⟩, fun x => ⟨⟨_, _⟩, x.2⟩, fun _ => by ext; rfl,
fun _ => by ext; rfl⟩
let eY : { p : Z × PUnit // f p.fst = Sum.inr p.snd } ≃ { x : Z // f x = Sum.inr PUnit.unit } :=
⟨fun p => ⟨p.1.1, p.2.trans (congr_arg Sum.inr <| Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩,
fun x => ⟨⟨_, _⟩, x.2⟩, fun _ => by ext; rfl, fun _ => by ext; rfl⟩
fapply BinaryCofan.isColimitMk
· exact fun s x => dite _ (fun h => s.inl <| eX.symm ⟨x, h⟩)
fun h => s.inr <| eY.symm ⟨x, (this x).resolve_left h⟩
· intro s
ext ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟩⟩, _⟩
dsimp
split_ifs <;> rfl
· intro s
ext ⟨⟨x, ⟨⟩⟩, hx⟩
dsimp
split_ifs with h
· cases h.symm.trans hx
· rfl
· intro s m e₁ e₂
ext x
split_ifs
· rw [← e₁]
rfl
· rw [← e₂]
rfl
#align category_theory.types.finitary_extensive CategoryTheory.types.finitaryExtensive
section TopCat
/-- (Implementation) An auxiliary lemma for the proof that `TopCat` is finitary extensive. -/
noncomputable def finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux (Z : TopCat.{u})
(f : Z ⟶ TopCat.of (Sum PUnit.{u + 1} PUnit.{u + 1})) :
IsColimit (BinaryCofan.mk
(TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (TopCat.of PUnit) (TopCat.of PUnit)).inl)
(TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (TopCat.of PUnit) (TopCat.of PUnit)).inr)) := by
have h₁ : Set.range (TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (.of PUnit) (.of PUnit)).inl) =
f ⁻¹' Set.range Sum.inl := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨PUnit.unit, x.2.symm⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨⟩, hx⟩; refine ⟨⟨⟨x, PUnit.unit⟩, hx.symm⟩, rfl⟩
have h₂ : Set.range (TopCat.pullbackFst f (TopCat.binaryCofan (.of PUnit) (.of PUnit)).inr) =
f ⁻¹' Set.range Sum.inr := by
apply le_antisymm
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact ⟨PUnit.unit, x.2.symm⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨⟩, hx⟩; refine ⟨⟨⟨x, PUnit.unit⟩, hx.symm⟩, rfl⟩
refine ((TopCat.binaryCofan_isColimit_iff _).mpr ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩).some
· refine ⟨(Homeomorph.prodPUnit Z).embedding.comp embedding_subtype_val, ?_⟩
convert f.2.1 _ isOpen_range_inl
· refine ⟨(Homeomorph.prodPUnit Z).embedding.comp embedding_subtype_val, ?_⟩
convert f.2.1 _ isOpen_range_inr
· convert Set.isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.preimage f
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_Top_aux CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux
instance finitaryExtensive_TopCat : FinitaryExtensive TopCat.{u} := by
rw [finitaryExtensive_iff_of_isTerminal TopCat.{u} _ TopCat.isTerminalPUnit _
(TopCat.binaryCofanIsColimit _ _)]
apply BinaryCofan.isVanKampen_mk _ _ (fun X Y => TopCat.binaryCofanIsColimit X Y) _
fun f g => TopCat.pullbackConeIsLimit f g
· intro X' Y' αX αY f hαX hαY
constructor
· refine ⟨⟨hαX.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inl y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· exact ⟨val, rfl, fun y h => Sum.inl_injective h.symm⟩
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((ConcreteCategory.congr_hom s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans
(ConcreteCategory.congr_hom hαY val : _).symm
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
refine ⟨⟨l, ?_⟩, ContinuousMap.ext fun a => (hl a).symm, TopCat.isTerminalPUnit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ => ContinuousMap.ext fun x =>
hl' x (l' x) (ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x).symm⟩
apply (embedding_inl (X := X') (Y := Y')).toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr
convert s.fst.2 using 1
exact (funext hl).symm
· refine ⟨⟨hαY.symm⟩, ⟨PullbackCone.isLimitAux' _ ?_⟩⟩
intro s
have : ∀ x, ∃! y, s.fst x = Sum.inr y := by
intro x
cases' h : s.fst x with val val
· apply_fun f at h
cases ((ConcreteCategory.congr_hom s.condition x).symm.trans h).trans
(ConcreteCategory.congr_hom hαX val : _).symm
· exact ⟨val, rfl, fun y h => Sum.inr_injective h.symm⟩
delta ExistsUnique at this
choose l hl hl' using this
refine ⟨⟨l, ?_⟩, ContinuousMap.ext fun a => (hl a).symm, TopCat.isTerminalPUnit.hom_ext _ _,
fun {l'} h₁ _ =>
ContinuousMap.ext fun x => hl' x (l' x) (ConcreteCategory.congr_hom h₁ x).symm⟩
apply (embedding_inr (X := X') (Y := Y')).toInducing.continuous_iff.mpr
convert s.fst.2 using 1
exact (funext hl).symm
· intro Z f
exact finitaryExtensiveTopCatAux Z f
end TopCat
section Functor
theorem finitaryExtensive_of_reflective
[HasFiniteCoproducts D] [HasPullbacksOfInclusions D] [FinitaryExtensive C]
{Gl : C ⥤ D} {Gr : D ⥤ C} (adj : Gl ⊣ Gr) [Gr.Full] [Gr.Faithful]
[∀ X Y (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj Y), HasPullback (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app Y)]
[∀ X Y (f : X ⟶ Gl.obj Y), PreservesLimit (cospan (Gr.map f) (adj.unit.app Y)) Gl]
[PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions Gl] :
FinitaryExtensive D := by
have : PreservesColimitsOfSize Gl := adj.leftAdjointPreservesColimits
constructor
intros X Y c hc
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.precompose_isIso_iff
(isoWhiskerLeft _ (asIso adj.counit) ≪≫ Functor.rightUnitor _).hom).mp
have : ∀ (Z : C) (i : Discrete WalkingPair) (f : Z ⟶ (colimit.cocone (pair X Y ⋙ Gr)).pt),
PreservesLimit (cospan f ((colimit.cocone (pair X Y ⋙ Gr)).ι.app i)) Gl := by
have : pair X Y ⋙ Gr = pair (Gr.obj X) (Gr.obj Y) := by
apply Functor.hext
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ <;> rfl
· rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : _ = j⟩⟩ <;> simp
rw [this]
rintro Z ⟨_|_⟩ f <;> dsimp <;> infer_instance
refine ((FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen _ (colimit.isColimit <| pair X Y ⋙ _)).map_reflective
adj).of_iso (IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso ?_ ?_)
· exact isColimitOfPreserves Gl (colimit.isColimit _)
· exact (IsColimit.precomposeHomEquiv _ _).symm hc
instance finitaryExtensive_functor [HasPullbacks C] [FinitaryExtensive C] :
FinitaryExtensive (D ⥤ C) :=
haveI : HasFiniteCoproducts (D ⥤ C) := ⟨fun _ => Limits.functorCategoryHasColimitsOfShape⟩
⟨fun c hc => isVanKampenColimit_of_evaluation _ c fun _ =>
FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen _ <| PreservesColimit.preserves hc⟩
noncomputable
instance {C} [Category C] {D} [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
{X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) F :=
have := hasPullback_of_left_iso f g
preservesLimitOfPreservesLimitCone (IsPullback.of_hasPullback f g).isLimit
((isLimitMapConePullbackConeEquiv _ pullback.condition).symm
(IsPullback.of_vert_isIso ⟨by simp only [← F.map_comp, pullback.condition]⟩).isLimit)
noncomputable
instance {C} [Category C] {D} [Category D] (F : C ⥤ D)
{X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Z) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : PreservesLimit (cospan f g) F :=
preservesPullbackSymmetry _ _ _
theorem finitaryExtensive_of_preserves_and_reflects (F : C ⥤ D) [FinitaryExtensive D]
[HasFiniteCoproducts C] [HasPullbacksOfInclusions C]
[PreservesPullbacksOfInclusions F]
[ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F] [PreservesColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) F]
[ReflectsColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) F] : FinitaryExtensive C := by
constructor
intros X Y c hc
refine IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso ?_ (hc.uniqueUpToIso (coprodIsCoprod X Y)).symm
have (i : Discrete WalkingPair) (Z : C) (f : Z ⟶ X ⨿ Y) :
PreservesLimit (cospan f ((BinaryCofan.mk coprod.inl coprod.inr).ι.app i)) F := by
rcases i with ⟨_|_⟩ <;> dsimp <;> infer_instance
refine (FinitaryExtensive.vanKampen _
(isColimitOfPreserves F (coprodIsCoprod X Y))).of_mapCocone F
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_of_preserves_and_reflects CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensive_of_preserves_and_reflects
theorem finitaryExtensive_of_preserves_and_reflects_isomorphism (F : C ⥤ D) [FinitaryExtensive D]
[HasFiniteCoproducts C] [HasPullbacks C] [PreservesLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F]
[PreservesColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) F] [F.ReflectsIsomorphisms] :
FinitaryExtensive C := by
haveI : ReflectsLimitsOfShape WalkingCospan F := reflectsLimitsOfShapeOfReflectsIsomorphisms
haveI : ReflectsColimitsOfShape (Discrete WalkingPair) F :=
reflectsColimitsOfShapeOfReflectsIsomorphisms
exact finitaryExtensive_of_preserves_and_reflects F
#align category_theory.finitary_extensive_of_preserves_and_reflects_isomorphism CategoryTheory.finitaryExtensive_of_preserves_and_reflects_isomorphism
end Functor
section FiniteCoproducts
theorem FinitaryPreExtensive.isUniversal_finiteCoproducts_Fin [FinitaryPreExtensive C] {n : ℕ}
{F : Discrete (Fin n) ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsUniversalColimit c := by
let f : Fin n → C := F.obj ∘ Discrete.mk
have : F = Discrete.functor f :=
Functor.hext (fun _ ↦ rfl) (by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩; simp [f])
clear_value f
subst this
induction' n with n IH
· exact (isVanKampenColimit_of_isEmpty _ hc).isUniversal
· apply IsUniversalColimit.of_iso _
((extendCofanIsColimit f (coproductIsCoproduct _) (coprodIsCoprod _ _)).uniqueUpToIso hc)
apply @isUniversalColimit_extendCofan _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_
· apply IH
exact coproductIsCoproduct _
· apply FinitaryPreExtensive.universal'
exact coprodIsCoprod _ _
· dsimp
infer_instance
theorem FinitaryPreExtensive.isUniversal_finiteCoproducts [FinitaryPreExtensive C] {ι : Type*}
[Finite ι] {F : Discrete ι ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsUniversalColimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
apply (IsUniversalColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff (Discrete.equivalence e).symm).mp
apply FinitaryPreExtensive.isUniversal_finiteCoproducts_Fin
exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv (Discrete.equivalence e).symm) hc
theorem FinitaryExtensive.isVanKampen_finiteCoproducts_Fin [FinitaryExtensive C] {n : ℕ}
{F : Discrete (Fin n) ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by
let f : Fin n → C := F.obj ∘ Discrete.mk
have : F = Discrete.functor f :=
Functor.hext (fun _ ↦ rfl) (by rintro ⟨i⟩ ⟨j⟩ ⟨⟨rfl : i = j⟩⟩; simp [f])
clear_value f
subst this
induction' n with n IH
· exact isVanKampenColimit_of_isEmpty _ hc
· apply IsVanKampenColimit.of_iso _
((extendCofanIsColimit f (coproductIsCoproduct _) (coprodIsCoprod _ _)).uniqueUpToIso hc)
apply @isVanKampenColimit_extendCofan _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ?_
· apply IH
exact coproductIsCoproduct _
· apply FinitaryExtensive.van_kampen'
exact coprodIsCoprod _ _
· dsimp
infer_instance
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Extensive.lean | 481 | 486 | theorem FinitaryExtensive.isVanKampen_finiteCoproducts [FinitaryExtensive C] {ι : Type*}
[Finite ι] {F : Discrete ι ⥤ C} {c : Cocone F} (hc : IsColimit c) : IsVanKampenColimit c := by |
obtain ⟨n, ⟨e⟩⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
apply (IsVanKampenColimit.whiskerEquivalence_iff (Discrete.equivalence e).symm).mp
apply FinitaryExtensive.isVanKampen_finiteCoproducts_Fin
exact (IsColimit.whiskerEquivalenceEquiv (Discrete.equivalence e).symm) hc
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Bicategory.Functor.Pseudofunctor
#align_import category_theory.bicategory.free from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"3d7987cda72abc473c7cdbbb075170e9ac620042"
/-!
# Free bicategories
We define the free bicategory over a quiver. In this bicategory, the 1-morphisms are freely
generated by the arrows in the quiver, and the 2-morphisms are freely generated by the formal
identities, the formal unitors, and the formal associators modulo the relation derived from the
axioms of a bicategory.
## Main definitions
* `FreeBicategory B`: the free bicategory over a quiver `B`.
* `FreeBicategory.lift F`: the pseudofunctor from `FreeBicategory B` to `C` associated with a
prefunctor `F` from `B` to `C`.
-/
universe w w₁ w₂ v v₁ v₂ u u₁ u₂
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Bicategory
open Bicategory
/-- Free bicategory over a quiver. Its objects are the same as those in the underlying quiver. -/
def FreeBicategory (B : Type u) :=
B
#align category_theory.free_bicategory CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory
instance (B : Type u) : ∀ [Inhabited B], Inhabited (FreeBicategory B) := by
intro h
exact id h
namespace FreeBicategory
section
variable {B : Type u} [Quiver.{v + 1} B]
/-- 1-morphisms in the free bicategory. -/
inductive Hom : B → B → Type max u v
| of {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom a b
| id (a : B) : Hom a a
| comp {a b c : B} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) : Hom a c
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.hom CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.Hom
instance (a b : B) [Inhabited (a ⟶ b)] : Inhabited (Hom a b) :=
⟨Hom.of default⟩
instance quiver : Quiver.{max u v + 1} (FreeBicategory B) where
Hom := fun a b : B => Hom a b
instance categoryStruct : CategoryStruct.{max u v} (FreeBicategory B) where
id := fun a : B => Hom.id a
comp := @fun _ _ _ => Hom.comp
/-- Representatives of 2-morphisms in the free bicategory. -/
-- Porting note(#5171): linter not ported yet
-- @[nolint has_nonempty_instance]
inductive Hom₂ : ∀ {a b : FreeBicategory B}, (a ⟶ b) → (a ⟶ b) → Type max u v
| id {a b} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom₂ f f
| vcomp {a b} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ g h) : Hom₂ f h
| whisker_left {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : Hom₂ g h) :
Hom₂ (f ≫ g) (f ≫ h)-- `η` cannot be earlier than `h` since it is a recursive argument.
| whisker_right {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} (h : b ⟶ c) (η : Hom₂ f g) : Hom₂ (f.comp h) (g.comp h)
| associator {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
Hom₂ ((f ≫ g) ≫ h) (f ≫ (g ≫ h))
| associator_inv {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
Hom₂ (f ≫ (g ≫ h)) ((f ≫ g) ≫ h)
| right_unitor {a b} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom₂ (f ≫ (𝟙 b)) f
| right_unitor_inv {a b} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom₂ f (f ≫ (𝟙 b))
| left_unitor {a b} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom₂ ((𝟙 a) ≫ f) f
| left_unitor_inv {a b} (f : a ⟶ b) : Hom₂ f ((𝟙 a) ≫ f)
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.hom₂ CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.Hom₂
section
-- The following notations are only used in the definition of `Rel` to simplify the notation.
local infixr:0 " ≫ " => Hom₂.vcomp
local notation "𝟙" => Hom₂.id
local notation f " ◁ " η => Hom₂.whisker_left f η
local notation η " ▷ " h => Hom₂.whisker_right h η
local notation "α_" => Hom₂.associator
local notation "λ_" => Hom₂.left_unitor
local notation "ρ_" => Hom₂.right_unitor
local notation "α⁻¹_" => Hom₂.associator_inv
local notation "λ⁻¹_" => Hom₂.left_unitor_inv
local notation "ρ⁻¹_" => Hom₂.right_unitor_inv
/-- Relations between 2-morphisms in the free bicategory. -/
inductive Rel : ∀ {a b : FreeBicategory B} {f g : a ⟶ b}, Hom₂ f g → Hom₂ f g → Prop
| vcomp_right {a b} {f g h : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ₁ θ₂ : Hom₂ g h) :
Rel θ₁ θ₂ → Rel (η ≫ θ₁) (η ≫ θ₂)
| vcomp_left {a b} {f g h : Hom a b} (η₁ η₂ : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ g h) :
Rel η₁ η₂ → Rel (η₁ ≫ θ) (η₂ ≫ θ)
| id_comp {a b} {f g : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) : Rel (𝟙 f ≫ η) η
| comp_id {a b} {f g : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) : Rel (η ≫ 𝟙 g) η
| assoc {a b} {f g h i : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ g h) (ι : Hom₂ h i) :
Rel ((η ≫ θ) ≫ ι) (η ≫ θ ≫ ι)
| whisker_left {a b c} (f : Hom a b) (g h : Hom b c) (η η' : Hom₂ g h) :
Rel η η' → Rel (f ◁ η) (f ◁ η')
| whisker_left_id {a b c} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) : Rel (f ◁ 𝟙 g) (𝟙 (f.comp g))
| whisker_left_comp {a b c} (f : Hom a b) {g h i : Hom b c} (η : Hom₂ g h) (θ : Hom₂ h i) :
Rel (f ◁ η ≫ θ) ((f ◁ η) ≫ f ◁ θ)
| id_whisker_left {a b} {f g : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) : Rel (Hom.id a ◁ η) (λ_ f ≫ η ≫ λ⁻¹_ g)
| comp_whisker_left {a b c d} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) {h h' : Hom c d} (η : Hom₂ h h') :
Rel (f.comp g ◁ η) (α_ f g h ≫ (f ◁ g ◁ η) ≫ α⁻¹_ f g h')
| whisker_right {a b c} (f g : Hom a b) (h : Hom b c) (η η' : Hom₂ f g) :
Rel η η' → Rel (η ▷ h) (η' ▷ h)
| id_whisker_right {a b c} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) : Rel (𝟙 f ▷ g) (𝟙 (f.comp g))
| comp_whisker_right {a b c} {f g h : Hom a b} (i : Hom b c) (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ g h) :
Rel ((η ≫ θ) ▷ i) ((η ▷ i) ≫ θ ▷ i)
| whisker_right_id {a b} {f g : Hom a b} (η : Hom₂ f g) : Rel (η ▷ Hom.id b) (ρ_ f ≫ η ≫ ρ⁻¹_ g)
| whisker_right_comp {a b c d} {f f' : Hom a b} (g : Hom b c) (h : Hom c d) (η : Hom₂ f f') :
Rel (η ▷ g.comp h) (α⁻¹_ f g h ≫ ((η ▷ g) ▷ h) ≫ α_ f' g h)
| whisker_assoc {a b c d} (f : Hom a b) {g g' : Hom b c} (η : Hom₂ g g') (h : Hom c d) :
Rel ((f ◁ η) ▷ h) (α_ f g h ≫ (f ◁ η ▷ h) ≫ α⁻¹_ f g' h)
| whisker_exchange {a b c} {f g : Hom a b} {h i : Hom b c} (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ h i) :
Rel ((f ◁ θ) ≫ η ▷ i) ((η ▷ h) ≫ g ◁ θ)
| associator_hom_inv {a b c d} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) (h : Hom c d) :
Rel (α_ f g h ≫ α⁻¹_ f g h) (𝟙 ((f.comp g).comp h))
| associator_inv_hom {a b c d} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) (h : Hom c d) :
Rel (α⁻¹_ f g h ≫ α_ f g h) (𝟙 (f.comp (g.comp h)))
| left_unitor_hom_inv {a b} (f : Hom a b) : Rel (λ_ f ≫ λ⁻¹_ f) (𝟙 ((Hom.id a).comp f))
| left_unitor_inv_hom {a b} (f : Hom a b) : Rel (λ⁻¹_ f ≫ λ_ f) (𝟙 f)
| right_unitor_hom_inv {a b} (f : Hom a b) : Rel (ρ_ f ≫ ρ⁻¹_ f) (𝟙 (f.comp (Hom.id b)))
| right_unitor_inv_hom {a b} (f : Hom a b) : Rel (ρ⁻¹_ f ≫ ρ_ f) (𝟙 f)
| pentagon {a b c d e} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) (h : Hom c d) (i : Hom d e) :
Rel ((α_ f g h ▷ i) ≫ α_ f (g.comp h) i ≫ f ◁ α_ g h i)
(α_ (f.comp g) h i ≫ α_ f g (h.comp i))
| triangle {a b c} (f : Hom a b) (g : Hom b c) : Rel (α_ f (Hom.id b) g ≫ f ◁ λ_ g) (ρ_ f ▷ g)
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.rel CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.Rel
end
instance homCategory (a b : FreeBicategory B) : Category (a ⟶ b) where
Hom f g := Quot (@Rel _ _ a b f g)
id f := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.id f)
comp := @fun f g h => Quot.map₂ Hom₂.vcomp Rel.vcomp_right Rel.vcomp_left
id_comp := by
rintro f g ⟨η⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.id_comp η)
comp_id := by
rintro f g ⟨η⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.comp_id η)
assoc := by
rintro f g h i ⟨η⟩ ⟨θ⟩ ⟨ι⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.assoc η θ ι)
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.hom_category CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.homCategory
/-- Bicategory structure on the free bicategory. -/
instance bicategory : Bicategory (FreeBicategory B) where
homCategory := @fun (a b : B) => FreeBicategory.homCategory a b
whiskerLeft := @fun a b c f g h η => Quot.map (Hom₂.whisker_left f) (Rel.whisker_left f g h) η
whiskerLeft_id := @fun a b c f g => Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_left_id f g)
associator := @fun a b c d f g h =>
{ hom := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.associator f g h)
inv := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.associator_inv f g h)
hom_inv_id := Quot.sound (Rel.associator_hom_inv f g h)
inv_hom_id := Quot.sound (Rel.associator_inv_hom f g h) }
leftUnitor := @fun a b f =>
{ hom := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.left_unitor f)
inv := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.left_unitor_inv f)
hom_inv_id := Quot.sound (Rel.left_unitor_hom_inv f)
inv_hom_id := Quot.sound (Rel.left_unitor_inv_hom f) }
rightUnitor := @fun a b f =>
{ hom := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.right_unitor f)
inv := Quot.mk Rel (Hom₂.right_unitor_inv f)
hom_inv_id := Quot.sound (Rel.right_unitor_hom_inv f)
inv_hom_id := Quot.sound (Rel.right_unitor_inv_hom f) }
whiskerLeft_comp := by
rintro a b c f g h i ⟨η⟩ ⟨θ⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_left_comp f η θ)
id_whiskerLeft := by
rintro a b f g ⟨η⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.id_whisker_left η)
comp_whiskerLeft := by
rintro a b c d f g h h' ⟨η⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.comp_whisker_left f g η)
whiskerRight := @fun a b c f g η h => Quot.map (Hom₂.whisker_right h) (Rel.whisker_right f g h) η
id_whiskerRight := @fun a b c f g => Quot.sound (Rel.id_whisker_right f g)
comp_whiskerRight := by
rintro a b c f g h ⟨η⟩ ⟨θ⟩ i
exact Quot.sound (Rel.comp_whisker_right i η θ)
whiskerRight_id := by
rintro a b f g ⟨η⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_right_id η)
whiskerRight_comp := by
rintro a b c d f f' ⟨η⟩ g h
exact Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_right_comp g h η)
whisker_assoc := by
rintro a b c d f g g' ⟨η⟩ h
exact Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_assoc f η h)
whisker_exchange := by
rintro a b c f g h i ⟨η⟩ ⟨θ⟩
exact Quot.sound (Rel.whisker_exchange η θ)
pentagon := @fun a b c d e f g h i => Quot.sound (Rel.pentagon f g h i)
triangle := @fun a b c f g => Quot.sound (Rel.triangle f g)
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.bicategory CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.bicategory
variable {a b c d : FreeBicategory B}
abbrev Hom₂.mk {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : Hom₂ f g) : f ⟶ g :=
Quot.mk Rel η
@[simp]
theorem mk_vcomp {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : Hom₂ f g) (θ : Hom₂ g h) :
(η.vcomp θ).mk = (η.mk ≫ θ.mk : f ⟶ h) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_vcomp CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_vcomp
@[simp]
theorem mk_whisker_left (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : Hom₂ g h) :
(Hom₂.whisker_left f η).mk = (f ◁ η.mk : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_whisker_left CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_whisker_left
@[simp]
theorem mk_whisker_right {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : Hom₂ f g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
(Hom₂.whisker_right h η).mk = (η.mk ▷ h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_whisker_right CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_whisker_right
variable (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d)
-- Porting note: I can not get this to typecheck, and I don't understand why.
-- theorem id_def : Hom.id a = 𝟙 a :=
-- rfl
-- #align category_theory.free_bicategory.id_def CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.id_def
#noalign category_theory.free_bicategory.id_def
theorem comp_def : Hom.comp f g = f ≫ g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.comp_def CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.comp_def
@[simp]
theorem mk_id : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.id f) = 𝟙 f :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_id CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_id
@[simp]
theorem mk_associator_hom : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.associator f g h) = (α_ f g h).hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_associator_hom CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_associator_hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_associator_inv : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.associator_inv f g h) = (α_ f g h).inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_associator_inv CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_associator_inv
@[simp]
theorem mk_left_unitor_hom : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.left_unitor f) = (λ_ f).hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_left_unitor_hom CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_left_unitor_hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_left_unitor_inv : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.left_unitor_inv f) = (λ_ f).inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_left_unitor_inv CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_left_unitor_inv
@[simp]
theorem mk_right_unitor_hom : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.right_unitor f) = (ρ_ f).hom :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_right_unitor_hom CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_right_unitor_hom
@[simp]
theorem mk_right_unitor_inv : Quot.mk _ (Hom₂.right_unitor_inv f) = (ρ_ f).inv :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.mk_right_unitor_inv CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.mk_right_unitor_inv
/-- Canonical prefunctor from `B` to `free_bicategory B`. -/
@[simps]
def of : Prefunctor B (FreeBicategory B) where
obj := id
map := @fun _ _ => Hom.of
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.of CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.of
end
section
variable {B : Type u₁} [Quiver.{v₁ + 1} B] {C : Type u₂} [CategoryStruct.{v₂} C]
variable (F : Prefunctor B C)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `lift`. -/
@[simp]
def liftHom : ∀ {a b : FreeBicategory B}, (a ⟶ b) → (F.obj a ⟶ F.obj b)
| _, _, Hom.of f => F.map f
| _, _, Hom.id a => 𝟙 (F.obj a)
| _, _, Hom.comp f g => liftHom f ≫ liftHom g
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.lift_hom CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.liftHom
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_id (a : FreeBicategory B) : liftHom F (𝟙 a) = 𝟙 (F.obj a) :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.lift_hom_id CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.liftHom_id
@[simp]
theorem liftHom_comp {a b c : FreeBicategory B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
liftHom F (f ≫ g) = liftHom F f ≫ liftHom F g :=
rfl
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.lift_hom_comp CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.liftHom_comp
end
section
variable {B : Type u₁} [Quiver.{v₁ + 1} B] {C : Type u₂} [Bicategory.{w₂, v₂} C]
variable (F : Prefunctor B C)
/-- Auxiliary definition for `lift`. -/
-- @[simp] -- Porting note: adding `@[simp]` causes a PANIC.
def liftHom₂ : ∀ {a b : FreeBicategory B} {f g : a ⟶ b}, Hom₂ f g → (liftHom F f ⟶ liftHom F g)
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.id _ => 𝟙 _
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.associator _ _ _ => (α_ _ _ _).hom
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.associator_inv _ _ _ => (α_ _ _ _).inv
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.left_unitor _ => (λ_ _).hom
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.left_unitor_inv _ => (λ_ _).inv
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.right_unitor _ => (ρ_ _).hom
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.right_unitor_inv _ => (ρ_ _).inv
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.vcomp η θ => liftHom₂ η ≫ liftHom₂ θ
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.whisker_left f η => liftHom F f ◁ liftHom₂ η
| _, _, _, _, Hom₂.whisker_right h η => liftHom₂ η ▷ liftHom F h
#align category_theory.free_bicategory.lift_hom₂ CategoryTheory.FreeBicategory.liftHom₂
attribute [local simp] whisker_exchange
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Free.lean | 346 | 347 | theorem liftHom₂_congr {a b : FreeBicategory B} {f g : a ⟶ b} {η θ : Hom₂ f g} (H : Rel η θ) :
liftHom₂ F η = liftHom₂ F θ := by | induction H <;> (dsimp [liftHom₂]; aesop_cat)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Set.Group
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Segment
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.FiniteDimensional
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
#align_import analysis.convex.between from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"571e13cacbed7bf042fd3058ce27157101433842"
/-!
# Betweenness in affine spaces
This file defines notions of a point in an affine space being between two given points.
## Main definitions
* `affineSegment R x y`: The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`.
* `Wbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`.
* `Sbtw R x y z`: The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`.
-/
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*}
open AffineEquiv AffineMap
section OrderedRing
variable [OrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- The segment of points weakly between `x` and `y`. When convexity is refactored to support
abstract affine combination spaces, this will no longer need to be a separate definition from
`segment`. However, lemmas involving `+ᵥ` or `-ᵥ` will still be relevant after such a
refactoring, as distinct from versions involving `+` or `-` in a module. -/
def affineSegment (x y : P) :=
lineMap x y '' Set.Icc (0 : R) 1
#align affine_segment affineSegment
theorem affineSegment_eq_segment (x y : V) : affineSegment R x y = segment R x y := by
rw [segment_eq_image_lineMap, affineSegment]
#align affine_segment_eq_segment affineSegment_eq_segment
theorem affineSegment_comm (x y : P) : affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R y x := by
refine Set.ext fun z => ?_
constructor <;>
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hxy⟩
refine ⟨1 - t, ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Set.sub_mem_Icc_iff_right, sub_self, sub_zero]
· rwa [lineMap_apply_one_sub]
#align affine_segment_comm affineSegment_comm
theorem left_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : x ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨0, Set.left_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_zero _ _⟩
#align left_mem_affine_segment left_mem_affineSegment
theorem right_mem_affineSegment (x y : P) : y ∈ affineSegment R x y :=
⟨1, Set.right_mem_Icc.2 zero_le_one, lineMap_apply_one _ _⟩
#align right_mem_affine_segment right_mem_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_same (x : P) : affineSegment R x x = {x} := by
-- Porting note: added as this doesn't do anything in `simp_rw` any more
rw [affineSegment]
-- Note: when adding "simp made no progress" in lean4#2336,
-- had to change `lineMap_same` to `lineMap_same _`. Not sure why?
-- Porting note: added `_ _` and `Function.const`
simp_rw [lineMap_same _, AffineMap.coe_const _ _, Function.const,
(Set.nonempty_Icc.mpr zero_le_one).image_const]
#align affine_segment_same affineSegment_same
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_image (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (x y : P) :
f '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (f x) (f y) := by
rw [affineSegment, affineSegment, Set.image_image, ← comp_lineMap]
rfl
#align affine_segment_image affineSegment_image
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vadd_image (x y : P) (v : V) :
(v +ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVAdd R P v : P →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vadd_image affineSegment_const_vadd_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vadd_const_image (x y : V) (p : P) :
(· +ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p : V →ᵃ[R] P) x y
#align affine_segment_vadd_const_image affineSegment_vadd_const_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_const_vsub_image (x y p : P) :
(p -ᵥ ·) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) :=
affineSegment_image (AffineEquiv.constVSub R p : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_const_vsub_image affineSegment_const_vsub_image
@[simp]
theorem affineSegment_vsub_const_image (x y p : P) :
(· -ᵥ p) '' affineSegment R x y = affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) :=
affineSegment_image ((AffineEquiv.vaddConst R p).symm : P →ᵃ[R] V) x y
#align affine_segment_vsub_const_image affineSegment_vsub_const_image
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vadd_affineSegment {x y z : P} (v : V) :
v +ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vadd_image, (AddAction.injective v).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vadd_affine_segment mem_const_vadd_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vadd_const_affineSegment {x y z : V} (p : P) :
z +ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vadd_const_image, (vadd_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vadd_const_affine_segment mem_vadd_const_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_const_vsub_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
p -ᵥ z ∈ affineSegment R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_const_vsub_image, (vsub_right_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_const_vsub_affine_segment mem_const_vsub_affineSegment
@[simp]
theorem mem_vsub_const_affineSegment {x y z : P} (p : P) :
z -ᵥ p ∈ affineSegment R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) ↔ z ∈ affineSegment R x y := by
rw [← affineSegment_vsub_const_image, (vsub_left_injective p).mem_set_image]
#align mem_vsub_const_affine_segment mem_vsub_const_affineSegment
variable (R)
/-- The point `y` is weakly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Wbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
y ∈ affineSegment R x z
#align wbtw Wbtw
/-- The point `y` is strictly between `x` and `z`. -/
def Sbtw (x y z : P) : Prop :=
Wbtw R x y z ∧ y ≠ x ∧ y ≠ z
#align sbtw Sbtw
variable {R}
lemma mem_segment_iff_wbtw {x y z : V} : y ∈ segment R x z ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment_eq_segment]
theorem Wbtw.map {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') : Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) := by
rw [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image]
exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ h
#align wbtw.map Wbtw.map
theorem Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.map _⟩
rwa [Wbtw, ← affineSegment_image, hf.mem_set_image] at h
#align function.injective.wbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff
theorem Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} {f : P →ᵃ[R] P'} (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
simp_rw [Sbtw, hf.wbtw_map_iff, hf.ne_iff]
#align function.injective.sbtw_map_iff Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Wbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.wbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.wbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.wbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff {x y z : P} (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') :
Sbtw R (f x) (f y) (f z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
refine Function.Injective.sbtw_map_iff (?_ : Function.Injective f.toAffineMap)
exact f.injective
#align affine_equiv.sbtw_map_iff AffineEquiv.sbtw_map_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Wbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vadd_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vadd_iff wbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vadd_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vadd_const_iff wbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_const_vsub_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_const_vsub_iff wbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Wbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Wbtw R x y z :=
mem_vsub_const_affineSegment _
#align wbtw_vsub_const_iff wbtw_vsub_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vadd_iff {x y z : P} (v : V) :
Sbtw R (v +ᵥ x) (v +ᵥ y) (v +ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vadd_iff, (AddAction.injective v).ne_iff,
(AddAction.injective v).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vadd_iff sbtw_const_vadd_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vadd_const_iff {x y z : V} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x +ᵥ p) (y +ᵥ p) (z +ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vadd_const_iff, (vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vadd_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vadd_const_iff sbtw_vadd_const_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_const_vsub_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (p -ᵥ x) (p -ᵥ y) (p -ᵥ z) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_const_vsub_iff, (vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_right_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_const_vsub_iff sbtw_const_vsub_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_vsub_const_iff {x y z : P} (p : P) :
Sbtw R (x -ᵥ p) (y -ᵥ p) (z -ᵥ p) ↔ Sbtw R x y z := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_vsub_const_iff, (vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff,
(vsub_left_injective p).ne_iff]
#align sbtw_vsub_const_iff sbtw_vsub_const_iff
theorem Sbtw.wbtw {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R x y z :=
h.1
#align sbtw.wbtw Sbtw.wbtw
theorem Sbtw.ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ x :=
h.2.1
#align sbtw.ne_left Sbtw.ne_left
theorem Sbtw.left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ y :=
h.2.1.symm
#align sbtw.left_ne Sbtw.left_ne
theorem Sbtw.ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : y ≠ z :=
h.2.2
#align sbtw.ne_right Sbtw.ne_right
theorem Sbtw.right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ≠ y :=
h.2.2.symm
#align sbtw.right_ne Sbtw.right_ne
theorem Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hyx, hyz⟩
rcases Set.eq_endpoints_or_mem_Ioo_of_mem_Icc ht with (rfl | rfl | ho)
· exfalso
exact hyx (lineMap_apply_zero _ _)
· exfalso
exact hyz (lineMap_apply_one _ _)
· exact ⟨t, ho, rfl⟩
#align sbtw.mem_image_Ioo Sbtw.mem_image_Ioo
theorem Wbtw.mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : y ∈ line[R, x, z] := by
rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.mem_affine_span Wbtw.mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Wbtw R x y z ↔ Wbtw R z y x := by
rw [Wbtw, Wbtw, affineSegment_comm]
#align wbtw_comm wbtw_comm
alias ⟨Wbtw.symm, _⟩ := wbtw_comm
#align wbtw.symm Wbtw.symm
theorem sbtw_comm {x y z : P} : Sbtw R x y z ↔ Sbtw R z y x := by
rw [Sbtw, Sbtw, wbtw_comm, ← and_assoc, ← and_assoc, and_right_comm]
#align sbtw_comm sbtw_comm
alias ⟨Sbtw.symm, _⟩ := sbtw_comm
#align sbtw.symm Sbtw.symm
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_left (x y : P) : Wbtw R x x y :=
left_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_left wbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_right (x y : P) : Wbtw R x y y :=
right_mem_affineSegment _ _ _
#align wbtw_self_right wbtw_self_right
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_self_iff {x y : P} : Wbtw R x y x ↔ y = x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· -- Porting note: Originally `simpa [Wbtw, affineSegment] using h`
have ⟨_, _, h₂⟩ := h
rw [h₂.symm, lineMap_same_apply]
· rw [h]
exact wbtw_self_left R x x
#align wbtw_self_iff wbtw_self_iff
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_left (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x x y :=
fun h => h.ne_left rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_left not_sbtw_self_left
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self_right (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y y :=
fun h => h.ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self_right not_sbtw_self_right
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ x) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left
theorem Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
rw [wbtw_self_iff] at h
exact hne h
#align wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right Wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_right
theorem Sbtw.left_ne_right {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ≠ z :=
h.wbtw.left_ne_right_of_ne_left h.2.1
#align sbtw.left_ne_right Sbtw.left_ne_right
theorem sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ y ∈ lineMap x z '' Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 ∧ x ≠ z := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.mem_image_Ioo, h.left_ne_right⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases h with ⟨⟨t, ht, rfl⟩, hxz⟩
refine ⟨⟨t, Set.mem_Icc_of_Ioo ht, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, ← @vsub_ne_zero V _ _ _ _ z, vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_self,
vadd_vsub_assoc, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev z x, ← @neg_one_smul R, ← add_smul, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
simp [smul_ne_zero, sub_eq_zero, ht.1.ne.symm, ht.2.ne, hxz.symm]
#align sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem not_sbtw_self (x y : P) : ¬Sbtw R x y x :=
fun h => h.left_ne_right rfl
#align not_sbtw_self not_sbtw_self
theorem wbtw_swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} (z : P) :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨hxyz, hyxz⟩
rcases hxyz with ⟨ty, hty, rfl⟩
rcases hyxz with ⟨tx, htx, hx⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, ← add_vadd] at hx
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, vadd_vsub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, smul_smul, ← sub_smul,
← add_smul, smul_eq_zero] at hx
rcases hx with (h | h)
· nth_rw 1 [← mul_one tx] at h
rw [← mul_sub, add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at h
have h' : ty = 0 := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ hty.1
rw [← h, Left.neg_nonpos_iff]
exact mul_nonneg htx.1 (sub_nonneg.2 hty.2)
simp [h']
· rw [vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq] at h
rw [h, lineMap_same_apply]
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨wbtw_self_left _ _ _, wbtw_self_left _ _ _⟩
#align wbtw_swap_left_iff wbtw_swap_left_iff
theorem wbtw_swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_comm (z := y), eq_comm]
exact wbtw_swap_left_iff R x
#align wbtw_swap_right_iff wbtw_swap_right_iff
theorem wbtw_rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] (x : P) {y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ∧ Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_swap_right_iff, eq_comm]
#align wbtw_rotate_iff wbtw_rotate_iff
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.swap_left_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R y x z ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_swap_left_iff R z, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_left_iff Wbtw.swap_left_iff
theorem Wbtw.swap_right_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R x z y ↔ y = z := by rw [← wbtw_swap_right_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.swap_right_iff Wbtw.swap_right_iff
theorem Wbtw.rotate_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) :
Wbtw R z x y ↔ x = y := by rw [← wbtw_rotate_iff R x, and_iff_right h]
#align wbtw.rotate_iff Wbtw.rotate_iff
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R y x z := fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.swap_left_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_left Sbtw.not_swap_left
theorem Sbtw.not_swap_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
¬Wbtw R x z y := fun hs => h.ne_right (h.wbtw.swap_right_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_swap_right Sbtw.not_swap_right
theorem Sbtw.not_rotate [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : ¬Wbtw R z x y :=
fun hs => h.left_ne (h.wbtw.rotate_iff.1 hs)
#align sbtw.not_rotate Sbtw.not_rotate
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Wbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
by_cases hxy : x = y
· rw [hxy, lineMap_same_apply]
simp
rw [or_iff_right hxy, Wbtw, affineSegment, (lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align wbtw_line_map_iff wbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_lineMap_iff [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {x y : P} {r : R} :
Sbtw R x (lineMap x y r) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_iff_mem_image_Ioo_and_ne, and_comm, and_congr_right]
intro hxy
rw [(lineMap_injective R hxy).mem_set_image]
#align sbtw_line_map_iff sbtw_lineMap_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Wbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x = y ∨ r ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 :=
wbtw_lineMap_iff
#align wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff wbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff [NoZeroDivisors R] {x y r : R} :
Sbtw R x (r * (y - x) + x) y ↔ x ≠ y ∧ r ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 :=
sbtw_lineMap_iff
#align sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Wbtw, affineSegment, Set.mem_image]
simp_rw [lineMap_apply_ring]
simp
#align wbtw_zero_one_iff wbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem wbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Wbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Icc (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align wbtw_one_zero_iff wbtw_one_zero_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_zero_one_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 0 x 1 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [Sbtw, wbtw_zero_one_iff, Set.mem_Icc, Set.mem_Ioo]
exact
⟨fun h => ⟨h.1.1.lt_of_ne (Ne.symm h.2.1), h.1.2.lt_of_ne h.2.2⟩, fun h =>
⟨⟨h.1.le, h.2.le⟩, h.1.ne', h.2.ne⟩⟩
#align sbtw_zero_one_iff sbtw_zero_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem sbtw_one_zero_iff {x : R} : Sbtw R 1 x 0 ↔ x ∈ Set.Ioo (0 : R) 1 := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_zero_one_iff]
#align sbtw_one_zero_iff sbtw_one_zero_iff
theorem Wbtw.trans_left {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z) (h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : Wbtw R w x z := by
rcases h₁ with ⟨t₁, ht₁, rfl⟩
rcases h₂ with ⟨t₂, ht₂, rfl⟩
refine ⟨t₂ * t₁, ⟨mul_nonneg ht₂.1 ht₁.1, mul_le_one ht₂.2 ht₁.1 ht₁.2⟩, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, lineMap_apply, lineMap_vsub_left, smul_smul]
#align wbtw.trans_left Wbtw.trans_left
theorem Wbtw.trans_right {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z) (h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : Wbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_left h₂
#align wbtw.trans_right Wbtw.trans_right
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z := by
refine ⟨h₁.trans_left h₂.wbtw, h₂.ne_left, ?_⟩
rintro rfl
exact h₂.right_ne ((wbtw_swap_right_iff R w).1 ⟨h₁, h₂.wbtw⟩)
#align wbtw.trans_sbtw_left Wbtw.trans_sbtw_left
theorem Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z := by
rw [wbtw_comm] at *
rw [sbtw_comm] at *
exact h₁.trans_sbtw_left h₂
#align wbtw.trans_sbtw_right Wbtw.trans_sbtw_right
theorem Sbtw.trans_left [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R w x y) : Sbtw R w x z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_left h₂
#align sbtw.trans_left Sbtw.trans_left
theorem Sbtw.trans_right [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Sbtw R x y z) : Sbtw R w y z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_sbtw_right h₂
#align sbtw.trans_right Sbtw.trans_right
theorem Wbtw.trans_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) (h : y ≠ z) : x ≠ z := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_right_iff.1 h₂)
#align wbtw.trans_left_ne Wbtw.trans_left_ne
theorem Wbtw.trans_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Wbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) (h : w ≠ x) : w ≠ y := by
rintro rfl
exact h (h₁.swap_left_iff.1 h₂)
#align wbtw.trans_right_ne Wbtw.trans_right_ne
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w y z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R w x y) : x ≠ z :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_left_ne h₂ h₁.ne_right
#align sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne Sbtw.trans_wbtw_left_ne
theorem Sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V] {w x y z : P} (h₁ : Sbtw R w x z)
(h₂ : Wbtw R x y z) : w ≠ y :=
h₁.wbtw.trans_right_ne h₂ h₁.left_ne
#align sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne Sbtw.trans_wbtw_right_ne
theorem Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroDivisors R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{ι : Type*} {p : ι → P} (ha : AffineIndependent R p) {w w₁ w₂ : ι → R} {s : Finset ι}
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hw₁ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₁ i = 1) (hw₂ : ∑ i ∈ s, w₂ i = 1)
(h : s.affineCombination R p w ∈
line[R, s.affineCombination R p w₁, s.affineCombination R p w₂])
{i : ι} (his : i ∈ s) (hs : Sbtw R (w₁ i) (w i) (w₂ i)) :
Sbtw R (s.affineCombination R p w₁) (s.affineCombination R p w)
(s.affineCombination R p w₂) := by
rw [affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_pair ha hw hw₁ hw₂] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, hr⟩
rw [hr i his, sbtw_mul_sub_add_iff] at hs
change ∀ i ∈ s, w i = (r • (w₂ - w₁) + w₁) i at hr
rw [s.affineCombination_congr hr fun _ _ => rfl]
rw [← s.weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination, s.weightedVSub_const_smul,
← s.affineCombination_vsub, ← lineMap_apply, sbtw_lineMap_iff, and_iff_left hs.2,
← @vsub_ne_zero V, s.affineCombination_vsub]
intro hz
have hw₁w₂ : (∑ i ∈ s, (w₁ - w₂) i) = 0 := by
simp_rw [Pi.sub_apply, Finset.sum_sub_distrib, hw₁, hw₂, sub_self]
refine hs.1 ?_
have ha' := ha s (w₁ - w₂) hw₁w₂ hz i his
rwa [Pi.sub_apply, sub_eq_zero] at ha'
#align sbtw.affine_combination_of_mem_affine_span_pair Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair
end OrderedRing
section StrictOrderedCommRing
variable [StrictOrderedCommRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simp_rw [lineMap_apply]
rcases ht0.lt_or_eq with (ht0' | rfl); swap; · simp
rcases ht1.lt_or_eq with (ht1' | rfl); swap; · simp
refine Or.inr (Or.inr ⟨1 - t, t, sub_pos.2 ht1', ht0', ?_⟩)
simp only [vadd_vsub, smul_smul, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, smul_sub, ← sub_smul]
ring_nf
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub Wbtw.sameRay_vsub
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_left {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (y -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ x) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨ht0, _⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply] using SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_left (z -ᵥ x) ht0
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub_left Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_left
theorem Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_right {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) : SameRay R (z -ᵥ x) (z -ᵥ y) := by
rcases h with ⟨t, ⟨_, ht1⟩, rfl⟩
simpa [lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, sub_smul] using
SameRay.sameRay_nonneg_smul_right (z -ᵥ x) (sub_nonneg.2 ht1)
#align wbtw.same_ray_vsub_right Wbtw.sameRay_vsub_right
end StrictOrderedCommRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [LinearOrderedRing R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
/-- Suppose lines from two vertices of a triangle to interior points of the opposite side meet at
`p`. Then `p` lies in the interior of the first (and by symmetry the other) segment from a
vertex to the point on the opposite side. -/
theorem sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affineSpan_pair [NoZeroSMulDivisors R V]
{t : Affine.Triangle R P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) {p₁ p₂ p : P}
(h₁ : Sbtw R (t.points i₂) p₁ (t.points i₃)) (h₂ : Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p₂ (t.points i₃))
(h₁' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₁, p₁]) (h₂' : p ∈ line[R, t.points i₂, p₂]) :
Sbtw R (t.points i₁) p p₁ := by
-- Should not be needed; see comments on local instances in `Data.Sign`.
letI : DecidableRel ((· < ·) : R → R → Prop) := LinearOrderedRing.decidableLT
have h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₂
have h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃ := by
rintro rfl
simp at h₁
have h3 : ∀ i : Fin 3, i = i₁ ∨ i = i₂ ∨ i = i₃ := by
clear h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂'
-- Porting note: Originally `decide!`
intro i
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases i₁ <;> fin_cases i₂ <;> fin_cases i₃ <;> simp at h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ ⊢
have hu : (Finset.univ : Finset (Fin 3)) = {i₁, i₂, i₃} := by
clear h₁ h₂ h₁' h₂'
-- Porting note: Originally `decide!`
fin_cases i₁ <;> fin_cases i₂ <;> fin_cases i₃
<;> simp (config := {decide := true}) at h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ ⊢
have hp : p ∈ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
have hle : line[R, t.points i₁, p₁] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_pair_le_of_mem_of_mem (mem_affineSpan R (Set.mem_range_self _)) ?_
have hle : line[R, t.points i₂, t.points i₃] ≤ affineSpan R (Set.range t.points) := by
refine affineSpan_mono R ?_
simp [Set.insert_subset_iff]
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁.wbtw.mem_affineSpan
rw [AffineSubspace.le_def'] at hle
exact hle _ h₁'
have h₁i := h₁.mem_image_Ioo
have h₂i := h₂.mem_image_Ioo
rw [Set.mem_image] at h₁i h₂i
rcases h₁i with ⟨r₁, ⟨hr₁0, hr₁1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases h₂i with ⟨r₂, ⟨hr₂0, hr₂1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases eq_affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_of_fintype hp with ⟨w, hw, rfl⟩
have h₁s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ hr₁0 hr₁1 h₁'
have h₂s :=
sign_eq_of_affineCombination_mem_affineSpan_single_lineMap t.independent hw (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) h₁₂.symm h₂₃ h₁₃ hr₂0 hr₂1 h₂'
rw [← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights R t.points
(Finset.mem_univ i₁),
← Finset.univ.affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights t.points (Finset.mem_univ _)
(Finset.mem_univ _)] at h₁' ⊢
refine
Sbtw.affineCombination_of_mem_affineSpan_pair t.independent hw
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights R (Finset.mem_univ _))
(Finset.univ.sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights (Finset.mem_univ _) (Finset.mem_univ _) _)
h₁' (Finset.mem_univ i₁) ?_
rw [Finset.affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self,
Finset.affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne h₁₂ h₁₃, sbtw_one_zero_iff]
have hs : ∀ i : Fin 3, SignType.sign (w i) = SignType.sign (w i₃) := by
intro i
rcases h3 i with (rfl | rfl | rfl)
· exact h₂s
· exact h₁s
· rfl
have hss : SignType.sign (∑ i, w i) = 1 := by simp [hw]
have hs' := sign_sum Finset.univ_nonempty (SignType.sign (w i₃)) fun i _ => hs i
rw [hs'] at hss
simp_rw [hss, sign_eq_one_iff] at hs
refine ⟨hs i₁, ?_⟩
rw [hu] at hw
rw [Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_insert, Finset.sum_singleton] at hw
· by_contra hle
rw [not_lt] at hle
exact (hle.trans_lt (lt_add_of_pos_right _ (Left.add_pos (hs i₂) (hs i₃)))).ne' hw
· simpa using h₂₃
· simpa [not_or] using ⟨h₁₂, h₁₃⟩
#align sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affine_span_pair sbtw_of_sbtw_of_sbtw_of_mem_affineSpan_pair
end LinearOrderedRing
section LinearOrderedField
variable [LinearOrderedField R] [AddCommGroup V] [Module R V] [AddTorsor V P]
variable {R}
theorem wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ x = y ∨ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with ⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, rfl⟩
rcases hr0.lt_or_eq with (hr0' | rfl)
· rw [Set.mem_image]
refine Or.inr ⟨r⁻¹, one_le_inv hr0' hr1, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel hr0'.ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
· simp
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩)
· exact wbtw_self_left _ _ _
· rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
refine ⟨r⁻¹, ⟨inv_nonneg.2 (zero_le_one.trans hr), inv_le_one hr⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, vadd_vsub]
rw [inv_mul_cancel (one_pos.trans_le hr).ne', one_smul, vsub_vadd]
#align wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
(wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.1 h).resolve_left hne
#align wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne Wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne
theorem Wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : x ≠ y) :
z ∈ line[R, x, y] := by
rcases h.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne with ⟨r, ⟨-, rfl⟩⟩
exact lineMap_mem_affineSpan_pair _ _ _
#align wbtw.right_mem_affine_span_of_left_ne Wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne
theorem sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ x ≠ y ∧ z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) := by
refine ⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_ne, ?_⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩ := h.wbtw.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne h.left_ne
rw [Set.mem_Ici] at hr
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (hrlt | rfl)
· exact Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hrlt
· exfalso
simp at h
· rcases h with ⟨hne, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [Set.mem_Ioi] at hr
refine
⟨wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici.2
(Or.inr (Set.mem_image_of_mem _ (Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset hr Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self))),
hne.symm, ?_⟩
rw [lineMap_apply, ← @vsub_ne_zero V, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub]
nth_rw 1 [← one_smul R (y -ᵥ x)]
rw [← sub_smul, smul_ne_zero_iff, vsub_ne_zero, sub_ne_zero]
exact ⟨hr.ne, hne.symm⟩
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_IoI sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
z ∈ lineMap x y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) :=
(sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi.1 h).2
#align sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi Sbtw.right_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.right_mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : z ∈ line[R, x, y] :=
h.wbtw.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne h.left_ne
#align sbtw.right_mem_affine_span Sbtw.right_mem_affineSpan
theorem wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici {x y z : P} :
Wbtw R x y z ↔ z = y ∨ x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) := by
rw [wbtw_comm, wbtw_iff_left_eq_or_right_mem_image_Ici]
#align wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici wbtw_iff_right_eq_or_left_mem_image_Ici
theorem Wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : z ≠ y) :
x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ici (1 : R) :=
h.symm.right_mem_image_Ici_of_left_ne hne
#align wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne Wbtw.left_mem_image_Ici_of_right_ne
theorem Wbtw.left_mem_affineSpan_of_right_ne {x y z : P} (h : Wbtw R x y z) (hne : z ≠ y) :
x ∈ line[R, z, y] :=
h.symm.right_mem_affineSpan_of_left_ne hne
#align wbtw.left_mem_affine_span_of_right_ne Wbtw.left_mem_affineSpan_of_right_ne
theorem sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} :
Sbtw R x y z ↔ z ≠ y ∧ x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) := by
rw [sbtw_comm, sbtw_iff_left_ne_and_right_mem_image_Ioi]
set_option linter.uppercaseLean3 false in
#align sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_IoI sbtw_iff_right_ne_and_left_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) :
x ∈ lineMap z y '' Set.Ioi (1 : R) :=
h.symm.right_mem_image_Ioi
#align sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi Sbtw.left_mem_image_Ioi
theorem Sbtw.left_mem_affineSpan {x y z : P} (h : Sbtw R x y z) : x ∈ line[R, z, y] :=
h.symm.right_mem_affineSpan
#align sbtw.left_mem_affine_span Sbtw.left_mem_affineSpan
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Between.lean | 760 | 764 | theorem wbtw_smul_vadd_smul_vadd_of_nonneg_of_le (x : P) (v : V) {r₁ r₂ : R} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁)
(hr₂ : r₁ ≤ r₂) : Wbtw R x (r₁ • v +ᵥ x) (r₂ • v +ᵥ x) := by |
refine ⟨r₁ / r₂, ⟨div_nonneg hr₁ (hr₁.trans hr₂), div_le_one_of_le hr₂ (hr₁.trans hr₂)⟩, ?_⟩
by_cases h : r₁ = 0; · simp [h]
simp [lineMap_apply, smul_smul, ((hr₁.lt_of_ne' h).trans_le hr₂).ne.symm]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
#align_import algebra.ring.defs from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"76de8ae01554c3b37d66544866659ff174e66e1f"
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file defines semirings, rings and domains. This is analogous to `Algebra.Group.Defs` and
`Algebra.Group.Basic`, the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
## Main definitions
* `Distrib`: Typeclass for distributivity of multiplication over addition.
* `HasDistribNeg`: Typeclass for commutativity of negation and multiplication. This is useful when
dealing with multiplicative submonoids which are closed under negation without being closed under
addition, for example `Units`.
* `(NonUnital)(NonAssoc)(Semi)Ring`: Typeclasses for possibly non-unital or non-associative
rings and semirings. Some combinations are not defined yet because they haven't found use.
## Tags
`Semiring`, `CommSemiring`, `Ring`, `CommRing`, domain, `IsDomain`, nonzero, units
-/
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {R : Type x}
open Function
/-!
### `Distrib` class
-/
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left and right distributive
over addition. -/
class Distrib (R : Type*) extends Mul R, Add R where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align distrib Distrib
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is left distributive over addition. -/
class LeftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is left distributive over addition -/
protected left_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c
#align left_distrib_class LeftDistribClass
/-- A typeclass stating that multiplication is right distributive over addition. -/
class RightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Mul R] [Add R] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is right distributive over addition -/
protected right_distrib : ∀ a b c : R, (a + b) * c = a * c + b * c
#align right_distrib_class RightDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.leftDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] : LeftDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.left_distrib⟩
#align distrib.left_distrib_class Distrib.leftDistribClass
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) Distrib.rightDistribClass (R : Type*) [Distrib R] :
RightDistribClass R :=
⟨Distrib.right_distrib⟩
#align distrib.right_distrib_class Distrib.rightDistribClass
theorem left_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [LeftDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
a * (b + c) = a * b + a * c :=
LeftDistribClass.left_distrib a b c
#align left_distrib left_distrib
alias mul_add := left_distrib
#align mul_add mul_add
theorem right_distrib [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c : R) :
(a + b) * c = a * c + b * c :=
RightDistribClass.right_distrib a b c
#align right_distrib right_distrib
alias add_mul := right_distrib
#align add_mul add_mul
theorem distrib_three_right [Mul R] [Add R] [RightDistribClass R] (a b c d : R) :
(a + b + c) * d = a * d + b * d + c * d := by simp [right_distrib]
#align distrib_three_right distrib_three_right
/-!
### Classes of semirings and rings
We make sure that the canonical path from `NonAssocSemiring` to `Ring` passes through `Semiring`,
as this is a path which is followed all the time in linear algebra where the defining semilinear map
`σ : R →+* S` depends on the `NonAssocSemiring` structure of `R` and `S` while the module
definition depends on the `Semiring` structure.
It is not currently possible to adjust priorities by hand (see lean4#2115). Instead, the last
declared instance is used, so we make sure that `Semiring` is declared after `NonAssocRing`, so
that `Semiring -> NonAssocSemiring` is tried before `NonAssocRing -> NonAssocSemiring`.
TODO: clean this once lean4#2115 is fixed
-/
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative semiring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends AddCommMonoid α, Distrib α, MulZeroClass α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_semiring NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital semiring. -/
class NonUnitalSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, SemigroupWithZero α
#align non_unital_semiring NonUnitalSemiring
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative semiring. -/
class NonAssocSemiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α, MulZeroOneClass α,
AddCommMonoidWithOne α
#align non_assoc_semiring NonAssocSemiring
/-- A not-necessarily-unital, not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonUnitalNonAssocRing (α : Type u) extends AddCommGroup α, NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α
#align non_unital_non_assoc_ring NonUnitalNonAssocRing
/-- An associative but not-necessarily unital ring. -/
class NonUnitalRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonUnitalSemiring α
#align non_unital_ring NonUnitalRing
/-- A unital but not-necessarily-associative ring. -/
class NonAssocRing (α : Type*) extends NonUnitalNonAssocRing α, NonAssocSemiring α,
AddCommGroupWithOne α
#align non_assoc_ring NonAssocRing
/-- A `Semiring` is a type with addition, multiplication, a `0` and a `1` where addition is
commutative and associative, multiplication is associative and left and right distributive over
addition, and `0` and `1` are additive and multiplicative identities. -/
class Semiring (α : Type u) extends NonUnitalSemiring α, NonAssocSemiring α, MonoidWithZero α
#align semiring Semiring
/-- A `Ring` is a `Semiring` with negation making it an additive group. -/
class Ring (R : Type u) extends Semiring R, AddCommGroup R, AddGroupWithOne R
#align ring Ring
/-!
### Semirings
-/
section DistribMulOneClass
variable [Add α] [MulOneClass α]
theorem add_one_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (a + 1) * b = a * b + b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align add_one_mul add_one_mul
theorem mul_add_one [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (b + 1) = a * b + a := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
#align mul_add_one mul_add_one
theorem one_add_mul [RightDistribClass α] (a b : α) : (1 + a) * b = b + a * b := by
rw [add_mul, one_mul]
#align one_add_mul one_add_mul
theorem mul_one_add [LeftDistribClass α] (a b : α) : a * (1 + b) = a + a * b := by
rw [mul_add, mul_one]
#align mul_one_add mul_one_add
end DistribMulOneClass
section NonAssocSemiring
variable [NonAssocSemiring α]
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [right_distrib_class α]
theorem two_mul (n : α) : 2 * n = n + n :=
(congrArg₂ _ one_add_one_eq_two.symm rfl).trans <| (right_distrib 1 1 n).trans (by rw [one_mul])
#align two_mul two_mul
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [right_distrib_class α]
set_option linter.deprecated false in
theorem bit0_eq_two_mul (n : α) : bit0 n = 2 * n :=
(two_mul _).symm
#align bit0_eq_two_mul bit0_eq_two_mul
-- Porting note: was [has_add α] [mul_one_class α] [left_distrib_class α]
theorem mul_two (n : α) : n * 2 = n + n :=
(congrArg₂ _ rfl one_add_one_eq_two.symm).trans <| (left_distrib n 1 1).trans (by rw [mul_one])
#align mul_two mul_two
end NonAssocSemiring
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_ite {α} [Mul α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c : α) :
(a * if P then b else c) = if P then a * b else a * c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align mul_ite mul_ite
#align add_ite add_ite
@[to_additive]
theorem ite_mul {α} [Mul α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c : α) :
(if P then a else b) * c = if P then a * c else b * c := by split_ifs <;> rfl
#align ite_mul ite_mul
#align ite_add ite_add
-- We make `mul_ite` and `ite_mul` simp lemmas,
-- but not `add_ite` or `ite_add`.
-- The problem we're trying to avoid is dealing with
-- summations of the form `∑ x ∈ s, (f x + ite P 1 0)`,
-- in which `add_ite` followed by `sum_ite` would needlessly slice up
-- the `f x` terms according to whether `P` holds at `x`.
-- There doesn't appear to be a corresponding difficulty so far with
-- `mul_ite` and `ite_mul`.
attribute [simp] mul_ite ite_mul
theorem ite_sub_ite {α} [Sub α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c d : α) :
((if P then a else b) - if P then c else d) = if P then a - c else b - d := by
split
repeat rfl
theorem ite_add_ite {α} [Add α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a b c d : α) :
((if P then a else b) + if P then c else d) = if P then a + c else b + d := by
split
repeat rfl
section MulZeroClass
variable [MulZeroClass α] (P Q : Prop) [Decidable P] [Decidable Q] (a b : α)
lemma ite_zero_mul : ite P a 0 * b = ite P (a * b) 0 := by simp
#align ite_mul_zero_left ite_zero_mul
lemma mul_ite_zero : a * ite P b 0 = ite P (a * b) 0 := by simp
#align ite_mul_zero_right mul_ite_zero
lemma ite_zero_mul_ite_zero : ite P a 0 * ite Q b 0 = ite (P ∧ Q) (a * b) 0 := by
simp only [← ite_and, ite_mul, mul_ite, mul_zero, zero_mul, and_comm]
#align ite_and_mul_zero ite_zero_mul_ite_zero
end MulZeroClass
-- Porting note: no @[simp] because simp proves it
theorem mul_boole {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : α) :
(a * if P then 1 else 0) = if P then a else 0 := by simp
#align mul_boole mul_boole
-- Porting note: no @[simp] because simp proves it
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Defs.lean | 249 | 250 | theorem boole_mul {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] (P : Prop) [Decidable P] (a : α) :
(if P then 1 else 0) * a = if P then a else 0 := by | simp
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Ziyu Wang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ziyu Wang, Chenyi Li, Sébastien Gouëzel, Penghao Yu, Zhipeng Cao
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Dual
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
/-!
# Gradient
## Main Definitions
Let `f` be a function from a Hilbert Space `F` to `𝕜` (`𝕜` is `ℝ` or `ℂ`) , `x` be a point in `F`
and `f'` be a vector in F. Then
`HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`
says that `f` has a gradient `f'` at `x`, where the domain of interest
is restricted to `s`. We also have
`HasGradientAt f f' x := HasGradientWithinAt f f' x univ`
## Main results
This file contains the following parts of gradient.
* the definition of gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasFDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientWithinAt` and `HasFDerivWithinAt`, `HasGradientAt` and `HasFDerivAt`,
`Gradient` and `fderiv`.
* theorems the Uniqueness of Gradient.
* the theorems translating between `HasGradientAtFilter` and `HasDerivAtFilter`,
`HasGradientAt` and `HasDerivAt`, `Gradient` and `deriv` when `F = 𝕜`.
* the theorems about the congruence of the gradient.
* the theorems about the gradient of constant function.
* the theorems about the continuity of a function admitting a gradient.
-/
open Topology InnerProductSpace Set
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 F : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 F] [CompleteSpace F]
variable {f : F → 𝕜} {f' x : F}
/-- A function `f` has the gradient `f'` as derivative along the filter `L` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` when `x'` converges along the filter `L`. -/
def HasGradientAtFilter (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) (L : Filter F) :=
HasFDerivAtFilter f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x L
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` within the subset `s` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def HasGradientWithinAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' : F) (s : Set F) (x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝[s] x)
/-- `f` has the gradient `f'` at the point `x` if
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def HasGradientAt (f : F → 𝕜) (f' x : F) :=
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x (𝓝 x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x` within the set `s`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x` inside `s`. -/
def gradientWithin (f : F → 𝕜) (s : Set F) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)
/-- Gradient of `f` at the point `x`, if it exists. Zero otherwise.
If the derivative exists (i.e., `∃ f', HasGradientAt f f' x`), then
`f x' = f x + ⟨f', x' - x⟩ + o (x' - x)` where `x'` converges to `x`. -/
def gradient (f : F → 𝕜) (x : F) : F :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).symm (fderiv 𝕜 f x)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[Gradient] notation "∇" => gradient
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
open scoped Gradient
variable {s : Set F} {L : Filter F}
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt {s : Set F} :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') s x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {s : Set F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt f frechet s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (toDual 𝕜 F f') x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt {frechet : F →L[𝕜] 𝕜} :
HasFDerivAt f frechet x ↔ HasGradientAt f ((toDual 𝕜 F).symm frechet) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply frechet]
alias ⟨HasGradientWithinAt.hasFDerivWithinAt, _⟩ := hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivWithinAt_iff_hasGradientWithinAt
alias ⟨HasGradientAt.hasFDerivAt, _⟩ := hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt
alias ⟨HasFDerivAt.hasGradientAt, _⟩ := hasFDerivAt_iff_hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (h : ¬DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) : ∇ f x = 0 := by
rw [gradient, fderiv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
theorem HasGradientAt.unique {gradf gradg : F}
(hf : HasGradientAt f gradf x) (hg : HasGradientAt f gradg x) :
gradf = gradg :=
(toDual 𝕜 F).injective (hf.hasFDerivAt.unique hg.hasFDerivAt)
theorem DifferentiableAt.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, gradient, (toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderiv 𝕜 f x)]
exact h.hasFDerivAt
theorem HasGradientAt.differentiableAt (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
h.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.hasGradientWithinAt (h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
HasGradientWithinAt f (gradientWithin f s x) s x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, gradientWithin,
(toDual 𝕜 F).apply_symm_apply (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x)]
exact h.hasFDerivWithinAt
theorem HasGradientWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt (h : HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
h.hasFDerivWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_univ : HasGradientWithinAt f f' univ x ↔ HasGradientAt f f' x := by
rw [hasGradientWithinAt_iff_hasFDerivWithinAt, hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt]
exact hasFDerivWithinAt_univ
theorem DifferentiableOn.hasGradientAt (h : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
HasGradientAt f (∇ f x) x :=
(h.hasFDerivAt hs).hasGradientAt
theorem HasGradientAt.gradient (h : HasGradientAt f f' x) : ∇ f x = f' :=
h.differentiableAt.hasGradientAt.unique h
theorem gradient_eq {f' : F → F} (h : ∀ x, HasGradientAt f (f' x) x) : ∇ f = f' :=
funext fun x => (h x).gradient
section OneDimension
variable {g : 𝕜 → 𝕜} {g' u : 𝕜} {L' : Filter 𝕜}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) g' := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasDerivAtFilter, this]
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u L' := by
have : ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (1 : 𝕜 →L[𝕜] 𝕜) g' = (toDual 𝕜 𝕜) (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') := by
ext; simp
rwa [HasGradientAtFilter, ← this]
theorem HasGradientAt.hasDerivAt (h : HasGradientAt g g' u) :
HasDerivAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt] at h
simpa using h
theorem HasDerivAt.hasGradientAt (h : HasDerivAt g g' u) :
HasGradientAt g (starRingEnd 𝕜 g') u := by
rw [hasGradientAt_iff_hasFDerivAt, hasFDerivAt_iff_hasDerivAt]
simpa
theorem gradient_eq_deriv : ∇ g u = starRingEnd 𝕜 (deriv g u) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 g u
· rw [h.hasGradientAt.hasDerivAt.deriv, RCLike.conj_conj]
· rw [gradient_eq_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt h, map_zero]
end OneDimension
section OneDimensionReal
variable {g : ℝ → ℝ} {g' u : ℝ} {L' : Filter ℝ}
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.hasDerivAtFilter' (h : HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L' := h.hasDerivAtFilter
theorem HasDerivAtFilter.hasGradientAtFilter' (h : HasDerivAtFilter g g' u L') :
HasGradientAtFilter g g' u L' := h.hasGradientAtFilter
theorem HasGradientAt.hasDerivAt' (h : HasGradientAt g g' u) :
HasDerivAt g g' u := h.hasDerivAt
theorem HasDerivAt.hasGradientAt' (h : HasDerivAt g g' u) :
HasGradientAt g g' u := h.hasGradientAt
theorem gradient_eq_deriv' : ∇ g u = deriv g u := gradient_eq_deriv
end OneDimensionReal
open Filter
section GradientProperties
theorem hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO :
HasGradientAtFilter f f' x L ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_isLittleO ..
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_isLittleO :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[𝓝[s] x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_iff_tendsto :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫‖) (𝓝[s] x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_isLittleO : HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
(fun x' : F => f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫) =o[𝓝 x] fun x' => x' - x :=
hasGradientAtFilter_iff_isLittleO
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_tendsto :
HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
Tendsto (fun x' => ‖x' - x‖⁻¹ * ‖f x' - f x - ⟪f', x' - x⟫‖) (𝓝 x) (𝓝 0) :=
hasFDerivAtFilter_iff_tendsto
theorem HasGradientAtFilter.isBigO_sub (h : HasGradientAtFilter f f' x L) :
(fun x' => f x' - f x) =O[L] fun x' => x' - x :=
HasFDerivAtFilter.isBigO_sub h
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_congr_set' {s t : Set F} (y : F) (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝[{y}ᶜ] x] t) :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set' y h
theorem hasGradientWithinAt_congr_set {s t : Set F} (h : s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t) :
HasGradientWithinAt f f' s x ↔ HasGradientWithinAt f f' t x :=
hasFDerivWithinAt_congr_set h
theorem hasGradientAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero : HasGradientAt f f' x ↔
(fun h => f (x + h) - f x - ⟪f', h⟫) =o[𝓝 0] fun h => h :=
hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero
end GradientProperties
section congr
/-! ### Congruence properties of the Gradient -/
variable {f₀ f₁ : F → 𝕜} {f₀' f₁' : F} {x₀ x₁ : F} {s₀ s₁ t : Set F} {L₀ L₁ : Filter F}
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.hasGradientAtFilter_iff (h₀ : f₀ =ᶠ[L] f₁) (hx : f₀ x = f₁ x)
(h₁ : f₀' = f₁') : HasGradientAtFilter f₀ f₀' x L ↔ HasGradientAtFilter f₁ f₁' x L :=
h₀.hasFDerivAtFilter_iff hx (by simp [h₁])
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Gradient/Basic.lean | 261 | 263 | theorem HasGradientAtFilter.congr_of_eventuallyEq (h : HasGradientAtFilter f f' x L)
(hL : f₁ =ᶠ[L] f) (hx : f₁ x = f x) : HasGradientAtFilter f₁ f' x L := by |
rwa [hL.hasGradientAtFilter_iff hx rfl]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Wrenna Robson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Vandermonde
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Basic
#align_import linear_algebra.lagrange from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"70fd9563a21e7b963887c9360bd29b2393e6225a"
/-!
# Lagrange interpolation
## Main definitions
* In everything that follows, `s : Finset ι` is a finite set of indexes, with `v : ι → F` an
indexing of the field over some type. We call the image of v on s the interpolation nodes,
though strictly unique nodes are only defined when v is injective on s.
* `Lagrange.basisDivisor x y`, with `x y : F`. These are the normalised irreducible factors of
the Lagrange basis polynomials. They evaluate to `1` at `x` and `0` at `y` when `x` and `y`
are distinct.
* `Lagrange.basis v i` with `i : ι`: the Lagrange basis polynomial that evaluates to `1` at `v i`
and `0` at `v j` for `i ≠ j`.
* `Lagrange.interpolate v r` where `r : ι → F` is a function from the fintype to the field: the
Lagrange interpolant that evaluates to `r i` at `x i` for all `i : ι`. The `r i` are the _values_
associated with the _nodes_`x i`.
-/
open Polynomial
section PolynomialDetermination
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {f g : R[X]}
section Finset
open Function Fintype
variable (s : Finset R)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero (degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card)
(eval_f : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt
simp_rw [eval_eq_sum_degreeLTEquiv degree_f_lt] at eval_f
rw [← degreeLTEquiv_eq_zero_iff_eq_zero degree_f_lt]
exact
Matrix.eq_zero_of_forall_index_sum_mul_pow_eq_zero
(Injective.comp (Embedding.subtype _).inj' (equivFinOfCardEq (card_coe _)).symm.injective)
fun _ => eval_f _ (Finset.coe_mem _)
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero
theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < s.card)
(eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
#align polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq
theorem eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq (degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card)
(degree_g_lt : g.degree < s.card) (eval_fg : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) : f = g := by
rw [← mem_degreeLT] at degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
refine eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq _ ?_ eval_fg
rw [← mem_degreeLT]; exact Submodule.sub_mem _ degree_f_lt degree_g_lt
#align polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq Polynomial.eq_of_degrees_lt_of_eval_finset_eq
/--
Two polynomials, with the same degree and leading coefficient, which have the same evaluation
on a set of distinct values with cardinality equal to the degree, are equal.
-/
theorem eq_of_degree_le_of_eval_finset_eq
(h_deg_le : f.degree ≤ s.card)
(h_deg_eq : f.degree = g.degree)
(hlc : f.leadingCoeff = g.leadingCoeff)
(h_eval : ∀ x ∈ s, f.eval x = g.eval x) :
f = g := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with rfl | hf
· rwa [degree_zero, eq_comm, degree_eq_bot, eq_comm] at h_deg_eq
· exact eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_finset_eq s
(lt_of_lt_of_le (degree_sub_lt h_deg_eq hf hlc) h_deg_le) h_eval
end Finset
section Indexed
open Finset
variable {ι : Type*} {v : ι → R} (s : Finset ι)
theorem eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_f_lt : f.degree < s.card) (eval_f : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = 0) : f = 0 := by
classical
rw [← card_image_of_injOn hvs] at degree_f_lt
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_finset_eq_zero _ degree_f_lt ?_
intro x hx
rcases mem_image.mp hx with ⟨_, hj, rfl⟩
exact eval_f _ hj
#align polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero Polynomial.eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Lagrange.lean | 103 | 109 | theorem eq_of_degree_sub_lt_of_eval_index_eq (hvs : Set.InjOn v s)
(degree_fg_lt : (f - g).degree < s.card) (eval_fg : ∀ i ∈ s, f.eval (v i) = g.eval (v i)) :
f = g := by |
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
refine eq_zero_of_degree_lt_of_eval_index_eq_zero _ hvs degree_fg_lt ?_
simp_rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
exact eval_fg
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Order.LiminfLimsup
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Rat
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
import Mathlib.Topology.Sequences
#align_import analysis.normed.group.basic from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"41bef4ae1254365bc190aee63b947674d2977f01"
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## TODO
This file is huge; move material into separate files,
such as `Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Lemmas.lean`.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 𝕜 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
#align has_norm Norm
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
#align has_nnnorm NNNorm
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc]
notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_group SeminormedGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_group NormedAddGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_group NormedGroup
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_add_comm_group SeminormedAddCommGroup
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align seminormed_comm_group SeminormedCommGroup
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
#align normed_comm_group NormedCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
#align normed_group.to_seminormed_group NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align normed_add_group.to_seminormed_add_group NormedAddGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_seminormed_comm_group NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_comm_group NormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
#align seminormed_comm_group.to_seminormed_group SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.to_seminormed_add_group SeminormedAddCommGroup.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
#align normed_comm_group.to_normed_group NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup
#align normed_add_comm_group.to_normed_add_group NormedAddCommGroup.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
def NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| by exact (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- Porting note: the `rwa` no longer worked, but it was easy enough to provide the term.
-- however, notice that if you make `x` and `y` accessible, then the following does work:
-- `have := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq x y; rwa [← this]`, so I'm not sure why the `rwa`
-- was broken.
#align normed_group.of_separation NormedGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_group.of_separation NormedAddGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible) "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
#align normed_comm_group.of_separation NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_separation NormedAddCommGroup.ofSeparation
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_right_inv y] using h₂ _ _ _
#align seminormed_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align seminormed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align seminormed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' SeminormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist NormedGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
#align normed_group.of_mul_dist' NormedGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
def NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align normed_comm_group.of_mul_dist' NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist'
#align normed_add_comm_group.of_add_dist' NormedAddCommGroup.ofAddDist'
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq x y := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
edist_dist x y := by exact ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq _
-- Porting note: how did `mathlib3` solve this automatically?
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
def GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_seminorm.to_seminormed_comm_group GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup
#align add_group_seminorm.to_seminormed_add_comm_group AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
#align group_norm.to_normed_group GroupNorm.toNormedGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddGroup
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive (attr := reducible)
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
def GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
#align group_norm.to_normed_comm_group GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup
#align add_group_norm.to_normed_add_comm_group AddGroupNorm.toNormedAddCommGroup
instance PUnit.normedAddCommGroup : NormedAddCommGroup PUnit where
norm := Function.const _ 0
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem PUnit.norm_eq_zero (r : PUnit) : ‖r‖ = 0 :=
rfl
#align punit.norm_eq_zero PUnit.norm_eq_zero
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
#align dist_eq_norm_div dist_eq_norm_div
#align dist_eq_norm_sub dist_eq_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align dist_eq_norm_div' dist_eq_norm_div'
#align dist_eq_norm_sub' dist_eq_norm_sub'
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
#align dist_eq_norm dist_eq_norm
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
#align dist_eq_norm' dist_eq_norm'
@[to_additive]
instance NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right : IsometricSMul Eᵐᵒᵖ E :=
⟨fun a => Isometry.of_dist_eq fun b c => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]⟩
#align normed_group.to_has_isometric_smul_right NormedGroup.to_isometricSMul_right
#align normed_add_group.to_has_isometric_vadd_right NormedAddGroup.to_isometricVAdd_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
#align dist_one_right dist_one_right
#align dist_zero_right dist_zero_right
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_left : dist (1 : E) = norm :=
funext fun a => by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
#align dist_one_left dist_one_left
#align dist_zero_left dist_zero_left
@[to_additive]
theorem Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one {f : E → F} (hi : Isometry f) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (x : E) :
‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by rw [← dist_one_right, ← h₁, hi.dist_eq, dist_one_right]
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_one Isometry.norm_map_of_map_one
#align isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero Isometry.norm_map_of_map_zero
@[to_additive (attr := simp) comap_norm_atTop]
theorem comap_norm_atTop' : comap norm atTop = cobounded E := by
simpa only [dist_one_right] using comap_dist_right_atTop (1 : E)
@[to_additive Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm]
lemma Filter.HasBasis.cobounded_of_norm' {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set ℝ}
(h : HasBasis atTop p s) : HasBasis (cobounded E) p fun i ↦ norm ⁻¹' s i :=
comap_norm_atTop' (E := E) ▸ h.comap _
@[to_additive Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm]
lemma Filter.hasBasis_cobounded_norm' : HasBasis (cobounded E) (fun _ ↦ True) ({x | · ≤ ‖x‖}) :=
atTop_basis.cobounded_of_norm'
@[to_additive (attr := simp) tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded]
theorem tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded' {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto (‖f ·‖) l atTop ↔ Tendsto f l (cobounded E) := by
rw [← comap_norm_atTop', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop' : Tendsto norm (cobounded E) atTop :=
tendsto_norm_atTop_iff_cobounded'.2 tendsto_id
@[to_additive eventually_cobounded_le_norm]
lemma eventually_cobounded_le_norm' (a : ℝ) : ∀ᶠ x in cobounded E, a ≤ ‖x‖ :=
tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'.eventually_ge_atTop a
@[to_additive tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop]
theorem tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop' [ProperSpace E] : Tendsto norm (cocompact E) atTop :=
cobounded_eq_cocompact (α := E) ▸ tendsto_norm_cobounded_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top' tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop'
#align tendsto_norm_cocompact_at_top tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
#align norm_div_rev norm_div_rev
#align norm_sub_rev norm_sub_rev
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
#align norm_inv' norm_inv'
#align norm_neg norm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_right (a b : E) : dist b (a * b) = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_left, ← dist_mul_right 1 a b, one_mul]
#align dist_mul_self_right dist_mul_self_right
#align dist_add_self_right dist_add_self_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_mul_self_left (a b : E) : dist (a * b) b = ‖a‖ := by
rw [dist_comm, dist_mul_self_right]
#align dist_mul_self_left dist_mul_self_left
#align dist_add_self_left dist_add_self_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left (a b c : E) : dist (a / b) c = dist a (c * b) := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ b, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left dist_div_eq_dist_mul_left
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left dist_sub_eq_dist_add_left
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right (a b c : E) : dist a (b / c) = dist (a * c) b := by
rw [← dist_mul_right _ _ c, div_mul_cancel]
#align dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right dist_div_eq_dist_mul_right
#align dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right dist_sub_eq_dist_add_right
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma Filter.inv_cobounded : (cobounded E)⁻¹ = cobounded E := by
simp only [← comap_norm_atTop', ← Filter.comap_inv, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·), norm_inv']
/-- In a (semi)normed group, inversion `x ↦ x⁻¹` tends to infinity at infinity. -/
@[to_additive "In a (semi)normed group, negation `x ↦ -x` tends to infinity at infinity."]
theorem Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded : Tendsto Inv.inv (cobounded E) (cobounded E) :=
inv_cobounded.le
#align filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded Filter.tendsto_inv_cobounded
#align filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded Filter.tendsto_neg_cobounded
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
#align norm_mul_le' norm_mul_le'
#align norm_add_le norm_add_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
#align norm_mul_le_of_le norm_mul_le_of_le
#align norm_add_le_of_le norm_add_le_of_le
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le]
theorem norm_mul₃_le (a b c : E) : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ :=
norm_mul_le_of_le (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
#align norm_mul₃_le norm_mul₃_le
#align norm_add₃_le norm_add₃_le
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
#align norm_nonneg' norm_nonneg'
#align norm_nonneg norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
#align abs_norm abs_norm
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq Function
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: multiplicative norms are nonnegative, via
`norm_nonneg'`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalMulNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg' $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: additive norms are nonnegative, via `norm_nonneg`. -/
@[positivity Norm.norm _]
def evalAddNorm : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(@Norm.norm $β $instDist $a) =>
let _inst ← synthInstanceQ q(SeminormedAddGroup $β)
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(norm_nonneg $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not ‖ · ‖"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
#align norm_one' norm_one'
#align norm_zero norm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
#align ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_norm_ne_zero
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
#align norm_of_subsingleton' norm_of_subsingleton'
#align norm_of_subsingleton norm_of_subsingleton
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq'
#align zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
#align norm_div_le norm_div_le
#align norm_sub_le norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
#align norm_div_le_of_le norm_div_le_of_le
#align norm_sub_le_of_le norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm' dist_le_norm_add_norm'
#align dist_le_norm_add_norm dist_le_norm_add_norm
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le' abs_norm_sub_norm_le'
#align abs_norm_sub_norm_le abs_norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
#align norm_sub_norm_le' norm_sub_norm_le'
#align norm_sub_norm_le norm_sub_norm_le
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
#align dist_norm_norm_le' dist_norm_norm_le'
#align dist_norm_norm_le dist_norm_norm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' norm_le_norm_add_norm_div'
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub' norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_div norm_le_norm_add_norm_div
#align norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
#align norm_le_insert' norm_le_insert'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
#align norm_le_insert norm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
#align norm_le_mul_norm_add norm_le_mul_norm_add
#align norm_le_add_norm_add norm_le_add_norm_add
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align ball_eq' ball_eq'
#align ball_eq ball_eq
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
#align ball_one_eq ball_one_eq
#align ball_zero_eq ball_zero_eq
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm'' mem_ball_iff_norm''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm mem_ball_iff_norm
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_ball_iff_norm''' mem_ball_iff_norm'''
#align mem_ball_iff_norm' mem_ball_iff_norm'
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
#align mem_ball_one_iff mem_ball_one_iff
#align mem_ball_zero_iff mem_ball_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm'' mem_closedBall_iff_norm''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm mem_closedBall_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- Porting note (#10618): `simp` can prove it
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
#align mem_closed_ball_one_iff mem_closedBall_one_iff
#align mem_closed_ball_zero_iff mem_closedBall_zero_iff
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm''' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'''
#align mem_closed_ball_iff_norm' mem_closedBall_iff_norm'
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball' norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_of_mem_closed_ball norm_le_of_mem_closedBall
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le'
#align norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball' norm_lt_of_mem_ball'
#align norm_lt_of_mem_ball norm_lt_of_mem_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right'] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
#align norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div
#align norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub norm_sub_sub_norm_sub_le_norm_sub
@[to_additive isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le]
theorem isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le' : Bornology.IsBounded s ↔ ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa only [Set.subset_def, mem_closedBall_one_iff] using isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall (1 : E)
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le' isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align bounded_iff_forall_norm_le isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le', _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
alias ⟨Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le, _⟩ := isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le
#align metric.bounded.exists_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le
attribute [to_additive existing exists_norm_le] Bornology.IsBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive exists_pos_norm_le]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R :=
let ⟨R₀, hR₀⟩ := hs.exists_norm_le'
⟨max R₀ 1, by positivity, fun x hx => (hR₀ x hx).trans <| le_max_left _ _⟩
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le' Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le'
#align metric.bounded.exists_pos_norm_le Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_le
@[to_additive Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.exists_pos_norm_lt' (hs : IsBounded s) : ∃ R > 0, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ < R :=
let ⟨R, hR₀, hR⟩ := hs.exists_pos_norm_le'
⟨R + 1, by positivity, fun x hx ↦ (hR x hx).trans_lt (lt_add_one _)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm' mem_sphere_iff_norm'
#align mem_sphere_iff_norm mem_sphere_iff_norm
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align mem_sphere_one_iff_norm mem_sphere_one_iff_norm
#align mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' norm_eq_of_mem_sphere'
#align norm_eq_of_mem_sphere norm_eq_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
#align ne_one_of_mem_sphere ne_one_of_mem_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_sphere
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
#align ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere
#align ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
#align norm_group_seminorm normGroupSeminorm
#align norm_add_group_seminorm normAddGroupSeminorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_norm_group_seminorm coe_normGroupSeminorm
#align coe_norm_add_group_seminorm coe_normAddGroupSeminorm
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_one NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_zero NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
#align normed_add_comm_group.tendsto_nhds_nhds NormedAddCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff [Nonempty α] [SemilatticeSup α] {u : α → E} :
CauchySeq u ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ N, ∀ m, N ≤ m → ∀ n, N ≤ n → ‖u m / u n‖ < ε := by
simp [Metric.cauchySeq_iff, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
#align normed_add_comm_group.cauchy_seq_iff NormedAddCommGroup.cauchySeq_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
#align normed_comm_group.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt
#align normed_add_comm_group.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt NormedAddCommGroup.nhds_zero_basis_norm_lt
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
#align normed_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
#align normed_add_comm_group.uniformity_basis_dist NormedAddCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is Lipschitz, if there exists a constant
`C` such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. The analogous condition for a linear map of
(semi)normed spaces is in `Mathlib/Analysis/NormedSpace/OperatorNorm.lean`."]
theorem MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal C) f :=
LipschitzWith.of_dist_le' fun x y => by simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div, map_div] using h (x / y)
#align monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.lipschitz_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzOnWith C f s ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzOnWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzOnWith C f s)
(ha : a ∈ s) (hb : b ∈ s) (hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le ha hb).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_on_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzOnWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
@[to_additive]
theorem lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} :
LipschitzWith C f ↔ ∀ x y, ‖f x / f y‖ ≤ C * ‖x / y‖ := by
simp only [lipschitzWith_iff_dist_le_mul, dist_eq_norm_div]
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_div_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with_iff_norm_sub_le lipschitzWith_iff_norm_sub_le
alias ⟨LipschitzWith.norm_div_le, _⟩ := lipschitzWith_iff_norm_div_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
attribute [to_additive] LipschitzWith.norm_div_le
@[to_additive]
theorem LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le {f : E → F} {C : ℝ≥0} (h : LipschitzWith C f)
(hr : ‖a / b‖ ≤ r) : ‖f a / f b‖ ≤ C * r :=
(h.norm_div_le _ _).trans <| by gcongr
#align lipschitz_with.norm_div_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_div_le_of_le
#align lipschitz_with.norm_sub_le_of_le LipschitzWith.norm_sub_le_of_le
/-- A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C` such that
for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism `f` of seminormed groups is continuous, if there exists a constant `C`
such that for all `x`, one has `‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖`"]
theorem MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : Continuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).continuous
#align monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.continuous_of_bound
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) (C : ℝ)
(h : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C * ‖x‖) : UniformContinuous f :=
(MonoidHomClass.lipschitz_of_bound f C h).uniformContinuous
#align monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound MonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
#align add_monoid_hom_class.uniform_continuous_of_bound AddMonoidHomClass.uniformContinuous_of_bound
@[to_additive IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn]
theorem IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn' [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : IsCompact s)
{f : α → E} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) : ∃ C, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
(isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.1 (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isBounded).imp fun _C hC _x hx =>
hC _ <| Set.mem_image_of_mem _ hx
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on' IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn'
#align is_compact.exists_bound_of_continuous_on IsCompact.exists_bound_of_continuousOn
@[to_additive]
theorem HasCompactMulSupport.exists_bound_of_continuous [TopologicalSpace α]
{f : α → E} (hf : HasCompactMulSupport f) (h'f : Continuous f) : ∃ C, ∀ x, ‖f x‖ ≤ C := by
simpa using (hf.isCompact_range h'f).isBounded.exists_norm_le'
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm [MonoidHomClass 𝓕 E F] (f : 𝓕) :
Isometry f ↔ ∀ x, ‖f x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
simp only [isometry_iff_dist_eq, dist_eq_norm_div, ← map_div]
refine ⟨fun h x => ?_, fun h x y => h _⟩
simpa using h x 1
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align add_monoid_hom_class.isometry_iff_norm AddMonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
alias ⟨_, MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm⟩ := MonoidHomClass.isometry_iff_norm
#align monoid_hom_class.isometry_of_norm MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
attribute [to_additive] MonoidHomClass.isometry_of_norm
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
#align seminormed_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm
#align seminormed_add_group.to_has_nnnorm SeminormedAddGroup.toNNNorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ :=
rfl
#align coe_nnnorm' coe_nnnorm'
#align coe_nnnorm coe_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
#align coe_comp_nnnorm' coe_comp_nnnorm'
#align coe_comp_nnnorm coe_comp_nnnorm
@[to_additive norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
#align norm_to_nnreal' norm_toNNReal'
#align norm_to_nnreal norm_toNNReal
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_div nndist_eq_nnnorm_div
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
#align nndist_eq_nnnorm nndist_eq_nnnorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 :=
NNReal.eq norm_one'
#align nnnorm_one' nnnorm_one'
#align nnnorm_zero nnnorm_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
#align ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
#align ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero ne_zero_of_nnnorm_ne_zero
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
#align nnnorm_mul_le' nnnorm_mul_le'
#align nnnorm_add_le nnnorm_add_le
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
#align nnnorm_inv' nnnorm_inv'
#align nnnorm_neg nnnorm_neg
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
#align nnnorm_div_le nnnorm_div_le
#align nnnorm_sub_le nnnorm_sub_le
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le'
#align nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div'
#align nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub' nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
#align nnnorm_le_insert' nnnorm_le_insert'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
#align nnnorm_le_insert nnnorm_le_insert
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
#align nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add
#align nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : ENNReal.ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖₊ :=
ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align of_real_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ := by
rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm']
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive edist_eq_coe_nnnorm]
theorem edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' (x : E) : edist x 1 = (‖x‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞) := by
rw [edist_eq_coe_nnnorm_div, div_one]
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm' edist_eq_coe_nnnorm'
#align edist_eq_coe_nnnorm edist_eq_coe_nnnorm
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 1,093 | 1,095 | theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by |
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Interval.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
#align_import algebra.big_operators.intervals from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"f7fc89d5d5ff1db2d1242c7bb0e9062ce47ef47c"
/-!
# Results about big operators over intervals
We prove results about big operators over intervals.
-/
open Nat
variable {α M : Type*}
namespace Finset
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [CommMonoid M] {f : α → M} {a b : α}
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f b * ∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ico_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f x) * f b = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ico_eq_prod_Icc h]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ioc h, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioc_mul_eq_prod_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : (∏ x ∈ Ioc a b, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Icc a b, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioc_eq_prod_Icc h]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_Ici (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ioi a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Ici a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Ioi_eq_prod_Ici]
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[to_additive]
lemma mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : f a * ∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, prod_cons]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_Iio_mul_eq_prod_Iic (a : α) : (∏ x ∈ Iio a, f x) * f a = ∏ x ∈ Iic a, f x := by
rw [mul_comm, mul_prod_Iio_eq_prod_Iic]
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [Fintype α] [LinearOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
[CommMonoid M]
@[to_additive]
lemma prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag (f : α → α → M) :
∏ i, ∏ j ∈ Ioi i, f j i * f i j = ∏ i, ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, f j i := by
simp_rw [← Ioi_disjUnion_Iio, prod_disjUnion, prod_mul_distrib]
congr 1
rw [prod_sigma', prod_sigma']
refine prod_nbij' (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) (fun i ↦ ⟨i.2, i.1⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ <;> simp
#align finset.prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag Finset.prod_prod_Ioi_mul_eq_prod_prod_off_diag
#align finset.sum_sum_Ioi_add_eq_sum_sum_off_diag Finset.sum_sum_Ioi_add_eq_sum_sum_off_diag
end LinearOrder
section Generic
variable [CommMonoid M] {s₂ s₁ s : Finset α} {a : α} {g f : α → M}
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add' [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (x + c)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
rw [← map_add_right_Ico, prod_map]
rfl
#align finset.prod_Ico_add' Finset.prod_Ico_add'
#align finset.sum_Ico_add' Finset.sum_Ico_add'
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_add [OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid α] [ExistsAddOfLE α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
(f : α → M) (a b c : α) : (∏ x ∈ Ico a b, f (c + x)) = ∏ x ∈ Ico (a + c) (b + c), f x := by
convert prod_Ico_add' f a b c using 2
rw [add_comm]
#align finset.prod_Ico_add Finset.prod_Ico_add
#align finset.sum_Ico_add Finset.sum_Ico_add
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ico a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k) * f b := by
rw [Nat.Ico_succ_right_eq_insert_Ico hab, prod_insert right_not_mem_Ico, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_Ico_succ_top Finset.prod_Ico_succ_top
#align finset.sum_Ico_succ_top Finset.sum_Ico_succ_top
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot {a b : ℕ} (hab : a < b) (f : ℕ → M) :
∏ k ∈ Ico a b, f k = f a * ∏ k ∈ Ico (a + 1) b, f k := by
have ha : a ∉ Ico (a + 1) b := by simp
rw [← prod_insert ha, Nat.Ico_insert_succ_left hab]
#align finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot Finset.prod_eq_prod_Ico_succ_bot
#align finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot Finset.sum_eq_sum_Ico_succ_bot
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ico m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ico n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ico m k, f i :=
Ico_union_Ico_eq_Ico hmn hnk ▸ Eq.symm (prod_union (Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive m n k))
#align finset.prod_Ico_consecutive Finset.prod_Ico_consecutive
#align finset.sum_Ico_consecutive Finset.sum_Ico_consecutive
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_consecutive (f : ℕ → M) {m n k : ℕ} (hmn : m ≤ n) (hnk : n ≤ k) :
((∏ i ∈ Ioc m n, f i) * ∏ i ∈ Ioc n k, f i) = ∏ i ∈ Ioc m k, f i := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioc_eq_Ioc hmn hnk, prod_union]
apply disjoint_left.2 fun x hx h'x => _
intros x hx h'x
exact lt_irrefl _ ((mem_Ioc.1 h'x).1.trans_le (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2)
#align finset.prod_Ioc_consecutive Finset.prod_Ioc_consecutive
#align finset.sum_Ioc_consecutive Finset.sum_Ioc_consecutive
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ioc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k ∈ Ioc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k ∈ Ioc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← prod_Ioc_consecutive _ hab (Nat.le_succ b), Nat.Ioc_succ_singleton, prod_singleton]
#align finset.prod_Ioc_succ_top Finset.prod_Ioc_succ_top
#align finset.sum_Ioc_succ_top Finset.sum_Ioc_succ_top
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Icc_succ_top {a b : ℕ} (hab : a ≤ b + 1) (f : ℕ → M) :
(∏ k in Icc a (b + 1), f k) = (∏ k in Icc a b, f k) * f (b + 1) := by
rw [← Nat.Ico_succ_right, prod_Ico_succ_top hab, Nat.Ico_succ_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_mul_prod_Ico (f : ℕ → M) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) * ∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k) = ∏ k ∈ range n, f k :=
Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range ▸ prod_Ico_consecutive f m.zero_le h
#align finset.prod_range_mul_prod_Ico Finset.prod_range_mul_prod_Ico
#align finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico Finset.sum_range_add_sum_Ico
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) * (∏ k ∈ range m, f k)⁻¹ :=
eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq.2 <| by (rw [mul_comm]; exact prod_range_mul_prod_Ico f h)
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv Finset.prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg Finset.sum_Ico_eq_add_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_div {δ : Type*} [CommGroup δ] (f : ℕ → δ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = (∏ k ∈ range n, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range m, f k := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using prod_Ico_eq_mul_inv f h
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_div Finset.prod_Ico_eq_div
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_range_div_prod_range {α : Type*} [CommGroup α] {f : ℕ → α} {n m : ℕ} (hnm : n ≤ m) :
((∏ k ∈ range m, f k) / ∏ k ∈ range n, f k) =
∏ k ∈ (range m).filter fun k => n ≤ k, f k := by
rw [← prod_Ico_eq_div f hnm]
congr
apply Finset.ext
simp only [mem_Ico, mem_filter, mem_range, *]
tauto
#align finset.prod_range_sub_prod_range Finset.prod_range_div_prod_range
#align finset.sum_range_sub_sum_range Finset.sum_range_sub_sum_range
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i ≤ j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico i b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a (j + 1), f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ <;>
omega
#align finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm Finset.sum_Ico_Ico_comm
/-- The two ways of summing over `(i, j)` in the range `a ≤ i < j < b` are equal. -/
theorem sum_Ico_Ico_comm' {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] (a b : ℕ) (f : ℕ → ℕ → M) :
(∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico (i + 1) b, f i j) =
∑ j ∈ Finset.Ico a b, ∑ i ∈ Finset.Ico a j, f i j := by
rw [Finset.sum_sigma', Finset.sum_sigma']
refine sum_nbij' (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) (fun x ↦ ⟨x.2, x.1⟩) ?_ ?_ (fun _ _ ↦ rfl) (fun _ _ ↦ rfl)
(fun _ _ ↦ rfl) <;>
simp only [Finset.mem_Ico, Sigma.forall, Finset.mem_sigma] <;>
rintro a b ⟨⟨h₁, h₂⟩, ⟨h₃, h₄⟩⟩ <;>
refine ⟨⟨_, _⟩, ⟨_, _⟩⟩ <;>
omega
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_Ico_eq_prod_range (f : ℕ → M) (m n : ℕ) :
∏ k ∈ Ico m n, f k = ∏ k ∈ range (n - m), f (m + k) := by
by_cases h : m ≤ n
· rw [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, prod_Ico_add, zero_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· replace h : n ≤ m := le_of_not_ge h
rw [Ico_eq_empty_of_le h, tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr h, range_zero, prod_empty, prod_empty]
#align finset.prod_Ico_eq_prod_range Finset.prod_Ico_eq_prod_range
#align finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range Finset.sum_Ico_eq_sum_range
theorem prod_Ico_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n + 1) :
(∏ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∏ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j := by
have : ∀ i < m, i ≤ n := by
intro i hi
exact (add_le_add_iff_right 1).1 (le_trans (Nat.lt_iff_add_one_le.1 hi) h)
cases' lt_or_le k m with hkm hkm
· rw [← Nat.Ico_image_const_sub_eq_Ico (this _ hkm)]
refine (prod_image ?_).symm
simp only [mem_Ico]
rintro i ⟨_, im⟩ j ⟨_, jm⟩ Hij
rw [← tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ im), Hij, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le (this _ jm)]
· have : n + 1 - k ≤ n + 1 - m := by
rw [tsub_le_tsub_iff_left h]
exact hkm
simp only [ge_iff_le, hkm, Ico_eq_empty_of_le, prod_empty, tsub_le_iff_right, Ico_eq_empty_of_le
this]
#align finset.prod_Ico_reflect Finset.prod_Ico_reflect
theorem sum_Ico_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (k : ℕ) {m n : ℕ}
(h : m ≤ n + 1) : (∑ j ∈ Ico k m, f (n - j)) = ∑ j ∈ Ico (n + 1 - m) (n + 1 - k), f j :=
@prod_Ico_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f k m n h
#align finset.sum_Ico_reflect Finset.sum_Ico_reflect
theorem prod_range_reflect (f : ℕ → M) (n : ℕ) :
(∏ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∏ j ∈ range n, f j := by
cases n
· simp
· simp only [← Nat.Ico_zero_eq_range, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero]
rw [prod_Ico_reflect _ _ le_rfl]
simp
#align finset.prod_range_reflect Finset.prod_range_reflect
theorem sum_range_reflect {δ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid δ] (f : ℕ → δ) (n : ℕ) :
(∑ j ∈ range n, f (n - 1 - j)) = ∑ j ∈ range n, f j :=
@prod_range_reflect (Multiplicative δ) _ f n
#align finset.sum_range_reflect Finset.sum_range_reflect
@[simp]
theorem prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ Ico 1 (n + 1), x) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
rw [prod_Ico_succ_top <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.zero_le n, Nat.factorial_succ,
prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial n, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, mul_comm]
#align finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial Finset.prod_Ico_id_eq_factorial
@[simp]
theorem prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial : ∀ n : ℕ, (∏ x ∈ range n, (x + 1)) = n !
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by simp [factorial, Finset.range_succ, prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial n]
#align finset.prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial Finset.prod_range_add_one_eq_factorial
section GaussSum
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
theorem sum_range_id_mul_two (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = n * (n - 1) :=
calc
(∑ i ∈ range n, i) * 2 = (∑ i ∈ range n, i) + ∑ i ∈ range n, (n - 1 - i) := by
rw [sum_range_reflect (fun i => i) n, mul_two]
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n, (i + (n - 1 - i)) := sum_add_distrib.symm
_ = ∑ i ∈ range n, (n - 1) :=
sum_congr rfl fun i hi => add_tsub_cancel_of_le <| Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt <| mem_range.1 hi
_ = n * (n - 1) := by rw [sum_const, card_range, Nat.nsmul_eq_mul]
#align finset.sum_range_id_mul_two Finset.sum_range_id_mul_two
/-- Gauss' summation formula -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Intervals.lean | 287 | 288 | theorem sum_range_id (n : ℕ) : ∑ i ∈ range n, i = n * (n - 1) / 2 := by |
rw [← sum_range_id_mul_two n, Nat.mul_div_cancel _ zero_lt_two]
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformConvergence
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.UniformEmbedding
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.CompleteSeparated
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Compact
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.DiscreteSubset
import Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
#align_import topology.algebra.uniform_group from "leanprover-community/mathlib"@"bcfa726826abd57587355b4b5b7e78ad6527b7e4"
/-!
# Uniform structure on topological groups
This file defines uniform groups and its additive counterpart. These typeclasses should be
preferred over using `[TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalGroup α]` since every topological
group naturally induces a uniform structure.
## Main declarations
* `UniformGroup` and `UniformAddGroup`: Multiplicative and additive uniform groups, that
i.e., groups with uniformly continuous `(*)` and `(⁻¹)` / `(+)` and `(-)`.
## Main results
* `TopologicalAddGroup.toUniformSpace` and `comm_topologicalAddGroup_is_uniform` can be used
to construct a canonical uniformity for a topological add group.
* extension of ℤ-bilinear maps to complete groups (useful for ring completions)
* `QuotientGroup.completeSpace` and `QuotientAddGroup.completeSpace` guarantee that quotients
of first countable topological groups by normal subgroups are themselves complete. In particular,
the quotient of a Banach space by a subspace is complete.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Classical
open Uniformity Topology Filter Pointwise
section UniformGroup
open Filter Set
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*}
/-- A uniform group is a group in which multiplication and inversion are uniformly continuous. -/
class UniformGroup (α : Type*) [UniformSpace α] [Group α] : Prop where
uniformContinuous_div : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => p.1 / p.2
#align uniform_group UniformGroup
/-- A uniform additive group is an additive group in which addition
and negation are uniformly continuous. -/
class UniformAddGroup (α : Type*) [UniformSpace α] [AddGroup α] : Prop where
uniformContinuous_sub : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => p.1 - p.2
#align uniform_add_group UniformAddGroup
attribute [to_additive] UniformGroup
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformGroup.mk' {α} [UniformSpace α] [Group α]
(h₁ : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => p.1 * p.2) (h₂ : UniformContinuous fun p : α => p⁻¹) :
UniformGroup α :=
⟨by simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using
h₁.comp (uniformContinuous_fst.prod_mk (h₂.comp uniformContinuous_snd))⟩
#align uniform_group.mk' UniformGroup.mk'
#align uniform_add_group.mk' UniformAddGroup.mk'
variable [UniformSpace α] [Group α] [UniformGroup α]
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_div : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => p.1 / p.2 :=
UniformGroup.uniformContinuous_div
#align uniform_continuous_div uniformContinuous_div
#align uniform_continuous_sub uniformContinuous_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformContinuous.div [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun x => f x / g x :=
uniformContinuous_div.comp (hf.prod_mk hg)
#align uniform_continuous.div UniformContinuous.div
#align uniform_continuous.sub UniformContinuous.sub
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformContinuous.inv [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f) :
UniformContinuous fun x => (f x)⁻¹ := by
have : UniformContinuous fun x => 1 / f x := uniformContinuous_const.div hf
simp_all
#align uniform_continuous.inv UniformContinuous.inv
#align uniform_continuous.neg UniformContinuous.neg
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_inv : UniformContinuous fun x : α => x⁻¹ :=
uniformContinuous_id.inv
#align uniform_continuous_inv uniformContinuous_inv
#align uniform_continuous_neg uniformContinuous_neg
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformContinuous.mul [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α} {g : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f)
(hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous fun x => f x * g x := by
have : UniformContinuous fun x => f x / (g x)⁻¹ := hf.div hg.inv
simp_all
#align uniform_continuous.mul UniformContinuous.mul
#align uniform_continuous.add UniformContinuous.add
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_mul : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => p.1 * p.2 :=
uniformContinuous_fst.mul uniformContinuous_snd
#align uniform_continuous_mul uniformContinuous_mul
#align uniform_continuous_add uniformContinuous_add
@[to_additive UniformContinuous.const_nsmul]
theorem UniformContinuous.pow_const [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f) :
∀ n : ℕ, UniformContinuous fun x => f x ^ n
| 0 => by
simp_rw [pow_zero]
exact uniformContinuous_const
| n + 1 => by
simp_rw [pow_succ']
exact hf.mul (hf.pow_const n)
#align uniform_continuous.pow_const UniformContinuous.pow_const
#align uniform_continuous.const_nsmul UniformContinuous.const_nsmul
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_const_nsmul]
theorem uniformContinuous_pow_const (n : ℕ) : UniformContinuous fun x : α => x ^ n :=
uniformContinuous_id.pow_const n
#align uniform_continuous_pow_const uniformContinuous_pow_const
#align uniform_continuous_const_nsmul uniformContinuous_const_nsmul
@[to_additive UniformContinuous.const_zsmul]
theorem UniformContinuous.zpow_const [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α} (hf : UniformContinuous f) :
∀ n : ℤ, UniformContinuous fun x => f x ^ n
| (n : ℕ) => by
simp_rw [zpow_natCast]
exact hf.pow_const _
| Int.negSucc n => by
simp_rw [zpow_negSucc]
exact (hf.pow_const _).inv
#align uniform_continuous.zpow_const UniformContinuous.zpow_const
#align uniform_continuous.const_zsmul UniformContinuous.const_zsmul
@[to_additive uniformContinuous_const_zsmul]
theorem uniformContinuous_zpow_const (n : ℤ) : UniformContinuous fun x : α => x ^ n :=
uniformContinuous_id.zpow_const n
#align uniform_continuous_zpow_const uniformContinuous_zpow_const
#align uniform_continuous_const_zsmul uniformContinuous_const_zsmul
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 10) UniformGroup.to_topologicalGroup : TopologicalGroup α where
continuous_mul := uniformContinuous_mul.continuous
continuous_inv := uniformContinuous_inv.continuous
#align uniform_group.to_topological_group UniformGroup.to_topologicalGroup
#align uniform_add_group.to_topological_add_group UniformAddGroup.to_topologicalAddGroup
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace β] [Group β] [UniformGroup β] : UniformGroup (α × β) :=
⟨((uniformContinuous_fst.comp uniformContinuous_fst).div
(uniformContinuous_fst.comp uniformContinuous_snd)).prod_mk
((uniformContinuous_snd.comp uniformContinuous_fst).div
(uniformContinuous_snd.comp uniformContinuous_snd))⟩
@[to_additive]
instance Pi.instUniformGroup {ι : Type*} {G : ι → Type*} [∀ i, UniformSpace (G i)]
[∀ i, Group (G i)] [∀ i, UniformGroup (G i)] : UniformGroup (∀ i, G i) where
uniformContinuous_div := uniformContinuous_pi.mpr fun i ↦
(uniformContinuous_proj G i).comp uniformContinuous_fst |>.div <|
(uniformContinuous_proj G i).comp uniformContinuous_snd
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_translate_mul (a : α) : ((𝓤 α).map fun x : α × α => (x.1 * a, x.2 * a)) = 𝓤 α :=
le_antisymm (uniformContinuous_id.mul uniformContinuous_const)
(calc
𝓤 α =
((𝓤 α).map fun x : α × α => (x.1 * a⁻¹, x.2 * a⁻¹)).map fun x : α × α =>
(x.1 * a, x.2 * a) := by simp [Filter.map_map, (· ∘ ·)]
_ ≤ (𝓤 α).map fun x : α × α => (x.1 * a, x.2 * a) :=
Filter.map_mono (uniformContinuous_id.mul uniformContinuous_const)
)
#align uniformity_translate_mul uniformity_translate_mul
#align uniformity_translate_add uniformity_translate_add
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformEmbedding_translate_mul (a : α) : UniformEmbedding fun x : α => x * a :=
{ comap_uniformity := by
nth_rw 1 [← uniformity_translate_mul a, comap_map]
rintro ⟨p₁, p₂⟩ ⟨q₁, q₂⟩
simp only [Prod.mk.injEq, mul_left_inj, imp_self]
inj := mul_left_injective a }
#align uniform_embedding_translate_mul uniformEmbedding_translate_mul
#align uniform_embedding_translate_add uniformEmbedding_translate_add
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
instance : UniformGroup αᵐᵒᵖ :=
⟨uniformContinuous_op.comp
((uniformContinuous_unop.comp uniformContinuous_snd).inv.mul <|
uniformContinuous_unop.comp uniformContinuous_fst)⟩
end MulOpposite
section LatticeOps
variable [Group β]
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformGroup_sInf {us : Set (UniformSpace β)} (h : ∀ u ∈ us, @UniformGroup β u _) :
@UniformGroup β (sInf us) _ :=
-- Porting note: {_} does not find `sInf us` instance, see `continuousSMul_sInf`
@UniformGroup.mk β (_) _ <|
uniformContinuous_sInf_rng.mpr fun u hu =>
uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ hu hu (@UniformGroup.uniformContinuous_div β u _ (h u hu))
#align uniform_group_Inf uniformGroup_sInf
#align uniform_add_group_Inf uniformAddGroup_sInf
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformGroup_iInf {ι : Sort*} {us' : ι → UniformSpace β}
(h' : ∀ i, @UniformGroup β (us' i) _) : @UniformGroup β (⨅ i, us' i) _ := by
rw [← sInf_range]
exact uniformGroup_sInf (Set.forall_mem_range.mpr h')
#align uniform_group_infi uniformGroup_iInf
#align uniform_add_group_infi uniformAddGroup_iInf
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformGroup_inf {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace β} (h₁ : @UniformGroup β u₁ _)
(h₂ : @UniformGroup β u₂ _) : @UniformGroup β (u₁ ⊓ u₂) _ := by
rw [inf_eq_iInf]
refine uniformGroup_iInf fun b => ?_
cases b <;> assumption
#align uniform_group_inf uniformGroup_inf
#align uniform_add_group_inf uniformAddGroup_inf
@[to_additive]
lemma UniformInducing.uniformGroup {γ : Type*} [Group γ] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformGroup γ]
[UniformSpace β] {F : Type*} [FunLike F β γ] [MonoidHomClass F β γ]
(f : F) (hf : UniformInducing f) :
UniformGroup β where
uniformContinuous_div := by
simp_rw [hf.uniformContinuous_iff, Function.comp_def, map_div]
exact uniformContinuous_div.comp (hf.uniformContinuous.prod_map hf.uniformContinuous)
@[to_additive]
protected theorem UniformGroup.comap {γ : Type*} [Group γ] {u : UniformSpace γ} [UniformGroup γ]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F β γ] [MonoidHomClass F β γ] (f : F) : @UniformGroup β (u.comap f) _ :=
letI : UniformSpace β := u.comap f; UniformInducing.uniformGroup f ⟨rfl⟩
#align uniform_group_comap UniformGroup.comap
#align uniform_add_group_comap UniformAddGroup.comap
end LatticeOps
namespace Subgroup
@[to_additive]
instance uniformGroup (S : Subgroup α) : UniformGroup S := .comap S.subtype
#align subgroup.uniform_group Subgroup.uniformGroup
#align add_subgroup.uniform_add_group AddSubgroup.uniformAddGroup
end Subgroup
section
variable (α)
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one : 𝓤 α = comap (fun x : α × α => x.2 / x.1) (𝓝 (1 : α)) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, Filter.comap_comap]
refine le_antisymm (Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap.1 ?_) ?_
· intro s hs
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant uniformContinuous_div hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
refine mem_map.2 (mem_of_superset ht ?_)
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simpa [subset_def] using hts a b a
· intro s hs
rcases mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant uniformContinuous_mul hs with ⟨t, ht, hts⟩
refine ⟨_, ht, ?_⟩
rintro ⟨a, b⟩
simpa [subset_def] using hts 1 (b / a) a
#align uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one
#align uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one_swapped :
𝓤 α = comap (fun x : α × α => x.1 / x.2) (𝓝 (1 : α)) := by
rw [← comap_swap_uniformity, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one, comap_comap]
rfl
#align uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one_swapped uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one_swapped
#align uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero_swapped uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_zero_swapped
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformGroup.ext {G : Type*} [Group G] {u v : UniformSpace G} (hu : @UniformGroup G u _)
(hv : @UniformGroup G v _)
(h : @nhds _ u.toTopologicalSpace 1 = @nhds _ v.toTopologicalSpace 1) : u = v :=
UniformSpace.ext <| by
rw [@uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one _ u _ hu, @uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one _ v _ hv, h]
#align uniform_group.ext UniformGroup.ext
#align uniform_add_group.ext UniformAddGroup.ext
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformGroup.ext_iff {G : Type*} [Group G] {u v : UniformSpace G}
(hu : @UniformGroup G u _) (hv : @UniformGroup G v _) :
u = v ↔ @nhds _ u.toTopologicalSpace 1 = @nhds _ v.toTopologicalSpace 1 :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ rfl, hu.ext hv⟩
#align uniform_group.ext_iff UniformGroup.ext_iff
#align uniform_add_group.ext_iff UniformAddGroup.ext_iff
variable {α}
@[to_additive]
theorem UniformGroup.uniformity_countably_generated [(𝓝 (1 : α)).IsCountablyGenerated] :
(𝓤 α).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one]
exact Filter.comap.isCountablyGenerated _ _
#align uniform_group.uniformity_countably_generated UniformGroup.uniformity_countably_generated
#align uniform_add_group.uniformity_countably_generated UniformAddGroup.uniformity_countably_generated
open MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one :
𝓤 α = comap (fun x : α × α => x.1⁻¹ * x.2) (𝓝 (1 : α)) := by
rw [← comap_uniformity_mulOpposite, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one, ← op_one, ← comap_unop_nhds,
comap_comap, comap_comap]
simp [(· ∘ ·)]
#align uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one
#align uniformity_eq_comap_neg_add_nhds_zero uniformity_eq_comap_neg_add_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one_swapped :
𝓤 α = comap (fun x : α × α => x.2⁻¹ * x.1) (𝓝 (1 : α)) := by
rw [← comap_swap_uniformity, uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one, comap_comap]
rfl
#align uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one_swapped uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one_swapped
#align uniformity_eq_comap_neg_add_nhds_zero_swapped uniformity_eq_comap_neg_add_nhds_zero_swapped
end
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set α}
(h : (𝓝 (1 : α)).HasBasis p U) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { x : α × α | x.2 / x.1 ∈ U i } := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one]
exact h.comap _
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_one Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set α}
(h : (𝓝 (1 : α)).HasBasis p U) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { x : α × α | x.1⁻¹ * x.2 ∈ U i } := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one]
exact h.comap _
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_neg_add Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_neg_add
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_swapped {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set α}
(h : (𝓝 (1 : α)).HasBasis p U) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { x : α × α | x.1 / x.2 ∈ U i } := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one_swapped]
exact h.comap _
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_swapped Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_swapped
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_swapped Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_swapped
@[to_additive]
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul_swapped {ι} {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set α}
(h : (𝓝 (1 : α)).HasBasis p U) :
(𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => { x : α × α | x.2⁻¹ * x.1 ∈ U i } := by
rw [uniformity_eq_comap_inv_mul_nhds_one_swapped]
exact h.comap _
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul_swapped Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_one_inv_mul_swapped
#align filter.has_basis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_neg_add_swapped Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_of_nhds_zero_neg_add_swapped
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_one {hom : Type*} [UniformSpace β] [Group β] [UniformGroup β]
[FunLike hom α β] [MonoidHomClass hom α β] {f : hom} (h : Tendsto f (𝓝 1) (𝓝 1)) :
UniformContinuous f := by
have :
((fun x : β × β => x.2 / x.1) ∘ fun x : α × α => (f x.1, f x.2)) = fun x : α × α =>
f (x.2 / x.1) := by ext; simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_div]
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one α, uniformity_eq_comap_nhds_one β,
tendsto_comap_iff, this]
exact Tendsto.comp h tendsto_comap
#align uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_one uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_one
#align uniform_continuous_of_tendsto_zero uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_zero
/-- A group homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements `MonoidHomClass`) between
two uniform groups is uniformly continuous provided that it is continuous at one. See also
`continuous_of_continuousAt_one`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive group homomorphism (a bundled morphism of a type that implements
`AddMonoidHomClass`) between two uniform additive groups is uniformly continuous provided that it
is continuous at zero. See also `continuous_of_continuousAt_zero`."]
theorem uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one {hom : Type*} [UniformSpace β] [Group β]
[UniformGroup β] [FunLike hom α β] [MonoidHomClass hom α β]
(f : hom) (hf : ContinuousAt f 1) :
UniformContinuous f :=
uniformContinuous_of_tendsto_one (by simpa using hf.tendsto)
#align uniform_continuous_of_continuous_at_one uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one
#align uniform_continuous_of_continuous_at_zero uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one [UniformSpace β] [Group β] [UniformGroup β]
(f : α →* β) (hf : ContinuousAt f 1) : UniformContinuous f :=
_root_.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one f hf
#align monoid_hom.uniform_continuous_of_continuous_at_one MonoidHom.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one
#align add_monoid_hom.uniform_continuous_of_continuous_at_zero AddMonoidHom.uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_zero
/-- A homomorphism from a uniform group to a discrete uniform group is continuous if and only if
its kernel is open. -/
@[to_additive "A homomorphism from a uniform additive group to a discrete uniform additive group is
continuous if and only if its kernel is open."]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/UniformGroup.lean | 415 | 423 | theorem UniformGroup.uniformContinuous_iff_open_ker {hom : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
[DiscreteTopology β] [Group β] [UniformGroup β] [FunLike hom α β] [MonoidHomClass hom α β]
{f : hom} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ IsOpen ((f : α →* β).ker : Set α) := by |
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf => ?_⟩
· apply (isOpen_discrete ({1} : Set β)).preimage hf.continuous
· apply uniformContinuous_of_continuousAt_one
rw [ContinuousAt, nhds_discrete β, map_one, tendsto_pure]
exact hf.mem_nhds (map_one f)
|
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pi.Bounds
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.NumberField.CanonicalEmbedding.ConvexBody
/-!
# Number field discriminant
This file defines the discriminant of a number field.
## Main definitions
* `NumberField.discr`: the absolute discriminant of a number field.
## Main result
* `NumberField.abs_discr_gt_two`: **Hermite-Minkowski Theorem**. A nontrivial number field has
discriminant greater than `2`.
* `NumberField.finite_of_discr_bdd`: **Hermite Theorem**. Let `N` be an integer. There are only
finitely many number fields (in some fixed extension of `ℚ`) of discriminant bounded by `N`.
## Tags
number field, discriminant
-/
-- TODO. Rewrite some of the FLT results on the disciminant using the definitions and results of
-- this file
namespace NumberField
open FiniteDimensional NumberField NumberField.InfinitePlace Matrix
open scoped Classical Real nonZeroDivisors
variable (K : Type*) [Field K] [NumberField K]
/-- The absolute discriminant of a number field. -/
noncomputable abbrev discr : ℤ := Algebra.discr ℤ (RingOfIntegers.basis K)
theorem coe_discr : (discr K : ℚ) = Algebra.discr ℚ (integralBasis K) :=
(Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ _ K (RingOfIntegers.basis K)).symm
theorem discr_ne_zero : discr K ≠ 0 := by
rw [← (Int.cast_injective (α := ℚ)).ne_iff, coe_discr]
exact Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis ℚ (integralBasis K)
theorem discr_eq_discr {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (b : Basis ι ℤ (𝓞 K)) :
Algebra.discr ℤ b = discr K := by
let b₀ := Basis.reindex (RingOfIntegers.basis K) (Basis.indexEquiv (RingOfIntegers.basis K) b)
rw [Algebra.discr_eq_discr (𝓞 K) b b₀, Basis.coe_reindex, Algebra.discr_reindex]
theorem discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv {L : Type*} [Field L] [NumberField L] (f : K ≃ₐ[ℚ] L) :
discr K = discr L := by
let f₀ : 𝓞 K ≃ₗ[ℤ] 𝓞 L := (f.restrictScalars ℤ).mapIntegralClosure.toLinearEquiv
rw [← Rat.intCast_inj, coe_discr, Algebra.discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv (integralBasis K) f,
← discr_eq_discr L ((RingOfIntegers.basis K).map f₀)]
change _ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ _
rw [← Algebra.discr_localizationLocalization ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ) L]
congr
ext
simp only [Function.comp_apply, integralBasis_apply, Basis.localizationLocalization_apply,
Basis.map_apply]
rfl
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Zspan NumberField.mixedEmbedding
NumberField.InfinitePlace ENNReal NNReal Complex
theorem _root_.NumberField.mixedEmbedding.volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis :
volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K)) =
(2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ NrComplexPlaces K * sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ := by
let f : Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) ≃ (K →+* ℂ) :=
(canonicalEmbedding.latticeBasis K).indexEquiv (Pi.basisFun ℂ _)
let e : (index K) ≃ Module.Free.ChooseBasisIndex ℤ (𝓞 K) := (indexEquiv K).trans f.symm
let M := (mixedEmbedding.stdBasis K).toMatrix ((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm)
let N := Algebra.embeddingsMatrixReindex ℚ ℂ (integralBasis K ∘ f.symm)
RingHom.equivRatAlgHom
suffices M.map Complex.ofReal = (matrixToStdBasis K) *
(Matrix.reindex (indexEquiv K).symm (indexEquiv K).symm N).transpose by
calc volume (fundamentalDomain (latticeBasis K))
_ = ‖((mixedEmbedding.stdBasis K).toMatrix ((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm)).det‖₊ := by
rw [← fundamentalDomain_reindex _ e.symm, ← norm_toNNReal, measure_fundamentalDomain
((latticeBasis K).reindex e.symm), volume_fundamentalDomain_stdBasis, mul_one]
rfl
_ = ‖(matrixToStdBasis K).det * N.det‖₊ := by
rw [← nnnorm_real, ← ofReal_eq_coe, RingHom.map_det, RingHom.mapMatrix_apply, this,
det_mul, det_transpose, det_reindex_self]
_ = (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ Fintype.card {w : InfinitePlace K // IsComplex w} * sqrt ‖N.det ^ 2‖₊ := by
have : ‖Complex.I‖₊ = 1 := by rw [← norm_toNNReal, norm_eq_abs, abs_I, Real.toNNReal_one]
rw [det_matrixToStdBasis, nnnorm_mul, nnnorm_pow, nnnorm_mul, this, mul_one, nnnorm_inv,
coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow, ← norm_toNNReal, RCLike.norm_two, Real.toNNReal_ofNat,
coe_inv two_ne_zero, coe_ofNat, nnnorm_pow, NNReal.sqrt_sq]
_ = (2 : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ ^ Fintype.card { w // IsComplex w } * NNReal.sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ := by
rw [← Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two, Algebra.discr_reindex,
← coe_discr, map_intCast, ← Complex.nnnorm_int]
ext : 2
dsimp only [M]
rw [Matrix.map_apply, Basis.toMatrix_apply, Basis.coe_reindex, Function.comp_apply,
Equiv.symm_symm, latticeBasis_apply, ← commMap_canonical_eq_mixed, Complex.ofReal_eq_coe,
stdBasis_repr_eq_matrixToStdBasis_mul K _ (fun _ => rfl)]
rfl
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr (I : (FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K)ˣ) :
∃ a ∈ (I : FractionalIdeal (𝓞 K)⁰ K), a ≠ 0 ∧
|Algebra.norm ℚ (a:K)| ≤ FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K *
(finrank ℚ K).factorial / (finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) * Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
-- The smallest possible value for `exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le`
let B := (minkowskiBound K I * (convexBodySumFactor K)⁻¹).toReal ^ (1 / (finrank ℚ K : ℝ))
have h_le : (minkowskiBound K I) ≤ volume (convexBodySum K B) := by
refine le_of_eq ?_
rw [convexBodySum_volume, ← ENNReal.ofReal_pow (by positivity), ← Real.rpow_natCast,
← Real.rpow_mul toReal_nonneg, div_mul_cancel₀, Real.rpow_one, ofReal_toReal, mul_comm,
mul_assoc, ← coe_mul, inv_mul_cancel (convexBodySumFactor_ne_zero K), ENNReal.coe_one,
mul_one]
· exact mul_ne_top (ne_of_lt (minkowskiBound_lt_top K I)) coe_ne_top
· exact (Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt finrank_pos))
convert exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le K I h_le
rw [div_pow B, ← Real.rpow_natCast B, ← Real.rpow_mul (by positivity), div_mul_cancel₀ _
(Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| ne_of_gt finrank_pos), Real.rpow_one, mul_comm_div, mul_div_assoc']
congr 1
rw [eq_comm]
calc
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ NrComplexPlaces K * sqrt ‖discr K‖₊ *
(2 : ℝ) ^ finrank ℚ K * ((2 : ℝ) ^ NrRealPlaces K * (π / 2) ^ NrComplexPlaces K /
(Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K)))⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [minkowskiBound, convexBodySumFactor,
volume_fundamentalDomain_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis,
volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis, toReal_mul, toReal_pow, toReal_inv, coe_toReal,
toReal_ofNat, mixedEmbedding.finrank, mul_assoc]
rw [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (Rat.cast_nonneg.mpr (FractionalIdeal.absNorm_nonneg I.1))]
simp_rw [NNReal.coe_inv, NNReal.coe_div, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_div,
coe_real_pi, NNReal.coe_ofNat, NNReal.coe_natCast]
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ) ^ (finrank ℚ K - NrComplexPlaces K - NrRealPlaces K +
NrComplexPlaces K : ℤ) * Real.sqrt ‖discr K‖ * Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K) *
π⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) := by
simp_rw [inv_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_inv, ← zpow_neg_one, ← zpow_natCast, mul_zpow,
← zpow_mul, neg_one_mul, mul_neg_one, neg_neg, Real.coe_sqrt, coe_nnnorm, sub_eq_add_neg,
zpow_add₀ (two_ne_zero : (2 : ℝ) ≠ 0)]
ring
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (2 : ℝ) ^ (2 * NrComplexPlaces K : ℤ) * Real.sqrt ‖discr K‖ *
Nat.factorial (finrank ℚ K) * π⁻¹ ^ (NrComplexPlaces K) := by
congr
rw [← card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_ofNat]
ring
_ = FractionalIdeal.absNorm I.1 * (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K * (finrank ℚ K).factorial *
Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
rw [Int.norm_eq_abs, zpow_mul, show (2 : ℝ) ^ (2 : ℤ) = 4 by norm_cast, div_pow,
inv_eq_one_div, div_pow, one_pow, zpow_natCast]
ring
theorem exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr :
∃ (a : 𝓞 K), a ≠ 0 ∧
|Algebra.norm ℚ (a : K)| ≤ (4 / π) ^ NrComplexPlaces K *
(finrank ℚ K).factorial / (finrank ℚ K) ^ (finrank ℚ K) * Real.sqrt |discr K| := by
obtain ⟨_, h_mem, h_nz, h_nm⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ideal_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr K ↑1
obtain ⟨a, rfl⟩ := (FractionalIdeal.mem_one_iff _).mp h_mem
refine ⟨a, ne_zero_of_map h_nz, ?_⟩
simp_rw [Units.val_one, FractionalIdeal.absNorm_one, Rat.cast_one, one_mul] at h_nm
exact h_nm
variable {K}
theorem abs_discr_ge (h : 1 < finrank ℚ K) :
(4 / 9 : ℝ) * (3 * π / 4) ^ finrank ℚ K ≤ |discr K| := by
-- We use `exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr` to get a nonzero
-- algebraic integer `x` of small norm and the fact that `1 ≤ |Norm x|` to get a lower bound
-- on `sqrt |discr K|`.
obtain ⟨x, h_nz, h_bd⟩ := exists_ne_zero_mem_ringOfIntegers_of_norm_le_mul_sqrt_discr K
have h_nm : (1 : ℝ) ≤ |Algebra.norm ℚ (x : K)| := by
rw [← Algebra.coe_norm_int, ← Int.cast_one, ← Int.cast_abs, Rat.cast_intCast, Int.cast_le]
exact Int.one_le_abs (Algebra.norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h_nz)
replace h_bd := le_trans h_nm h_bd
rw [← inv_mul_le_iff (by positivity), inv_div, mul_one, Real.le_sqrt (by positivity)
(by positivity), ← Int.cast_abs, div_pow, mul_pow, ← pow_mul, ← pow_mul] at h_bd
refine le_trans ?_ h_bd
-- The sequence `a n` is a lower bound for `|discr K|`. We prove below by induction an uniform
-- lower bound for this sequence from which we deduce the result.
let a : ℕ → ℝ := fun n => (n : ℝ) ^ (n * 2) / ((4 / π) ^ n * (n.factorial : ℝ) ^ 2)
suffices ∀ n, 2 ≤ n → (4 / 9 : ℝ) * (3 * π / 4) ^ n ≤ a n by
refine le_trans (this (finrank ℚ K) h) ?_
simp only [a]
gcongr
· exact (one_le_div Real.pi_pos).2 Real.pi_le_four
· rw [← card_add_two_mul_card_eq_rank, mul_comm]
exact Nat.le_add_left _ _
intro n hn
induction n, hn using Nat.le_induction with
| base => exact le_of_eq <| by norm_num [a, Nat.factorial_two]; field_simp; ring
| succ m _ h_m =>
suffices (3 : ℝ) ≤ (1 + 1 / m : ℝ) ^ (2 * m) by
convert_to _ ≤ (a m) * (1 + 1 / m : ℝ) ^ (2 * m) / (4 / π)
· simp_rw [a, add_mul, one_mul, pow_succ, Nat.factorial_succ]
field_simp; ring
· rw [_root_.le_div_iff (by positivity), pow_succ]
convert (mul_le_mul h_m this (by positivity) (by positivity)) using 1
field_simp; ring
refine le_trans (le_of_eq (by field_simp; norm_num)) (one_add_mul_le_pow ?_ (2 * m))
exact le_trans (by norm_num : (-2 : ℝ) ≤ 0) (by positivity)
/-- **Hermite-Minkowski Theorem**. A nontrivial number field has discriminant greater than `2`. -/
theorem abs_discr_gt_two (h : 1 < finrank ℚ K) : 2 < |discr K| := by
have h₁ : 1 ≤ 3 * π / 4 := by
rw [_root_.le_div_iff (by positivity), ← _root_.div_le_iff' (by positivity), one_mul]
linarith [Real.pi_gt_three]
have h₂ : (9 : ℝ) < π ^ 2 := by
rw [ ← Real.sqrt_lt (by positivity) (by positivity), show Real.sqrt (9 : ℝ) = 3 from
(Real.sqrt_eq_iff_sq_eq (by positivity) (by positivity)).mpr (by norm_num)]
exact Real.pi_gt_three
refine Int.cast_lt.mp <| lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (abs_discr_ge h)
rw [← _root_.div_lt_iff' (by positivity), Int.cast_ofNat]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (pow_le_pow_right (n := 2) h₁ h)
rw [div_pow, _root_.lt_div_iff (by norm_num), mul_pow,
show (2 : ℝ) / (4 / 9) * 4 ^ 2 = 72 by norm_num,
show (3 : ℝ) ^ 2 = 9 by norm_num,
← _root_.div_lt_iff' (by positivity),
show (72 : ℝ) / 9 = 8 by norm_num]
linarith [h₂]
/-!
### Hermite Theorem
This section is devoted to the proof of Hermite theorem.
Let `N` be an integer . We prove that the set `S` of finite extensions `K` of `ℚ`
(in some fixed extension `A` of `ℚ`) such that `|discr K| ≤ N` is finite by proving, using
`finite_of_finite_generating_set`, that there exists a finite set `T ⊆ A` such that
`∀ K ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ T, K = ℚ⟮x⟯` .
To find the set `T`, we construct a finite set `T₀` of polynomials in `ℤ[X]` containing, for each
`K ∈ S`, the minimal polynomial of a primitive element of `K`. The set `T` is then the union of
roots in `A` of the polynomials in `T₀`. More precisely, the set `T₀` is the set of all polynomials
in `ℤ[X]` of degrees and coefficients bounded by some explicit constants depending only on `N`.
Indeed, we prove that, for any field `K` in `S`, its degree is bounded, see
`rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd`, and also its Minkowski bound, see `minkowskiBound_lt_boundOfDiscBdd`.
Thus it follows from `mixedEmbedding.exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isComplex` and
`mixedEmbedding.exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isReal` that there exists an algebraic integer
`x` of `K` such that `K = ℚ(x)` and the conjugates of `x` are all bounded by some quantity
depending only on `N`.
Since the primitive element `x` is constructed differently depending on wether `K` has a infinite
real place or not, the theorem is proved in two parts.
-/
namespace hermiteTheorem
open Polynomial
open scoped IntermediateField
variable (A : Type*) [Field A] [CharZero A]
theorem finite_of_finite_generating_set {p : IntermediateField ℚ A → Prop}
(S : Set {F : IntermediateField ℚ A // p F}) {T : Set A}
(hT : T.Finite) (h : ∀ F ∈ S, ∃ x ∈ T, F = ℚ⟮x⟯) :
S.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff] at hT
refine Set.finite_coe_iff.mp <| Finite.of_injective
(fun ⟨F, hF⟩ ↦ (⟨(h F hF).choose, (h F hF).choose_spec.1⟩ : T)) (fun _ _ h_eq ↦ ?_)
rw [Subtype.ext_iff_val, Subtype.ext_iff_val]
convert congr_arg (ℚ⟮·⟯) (Subtype.mk_eq_mk.mp h_eq)
all_goals exact (h _ (Subtype.mem _)).choose_spec.2
variable (N : ℕ)
/-- An upper bound on the degree of a number field `K` with `|discr K| ≤ N`,
see `rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd`. -/
noncomputable abbrev rankOfDiscrBdd : ℕ :=
max 1 (Nat.floor ((Real.log ((9 / 4 : ℝ) * N) / Real.log (3 * π / 4))))
/-- An upper bound on the Minkowski bound of a number field `K` with `|discr K| ≤ N`;
see `minkowskiBound_lt_boundOfDiscBdd`. -/
noncomputable abbrev boundOfDiscBdd : ℝ≥0 := sqrt N * (2:ℝ≥0) ^ rankOfDiscrBdd N + 1
variable {N} (hK : |discr K| ≤ N)
/-- If `|discr K| ≤ N` then the degree of `K` is at most `rankOfDiscrBdd`. -/
theorem rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd :
finrank ℚ K ≤ rankOfDiscrBdd N := by
have h_nz : N ≠ 0 := by
refine fun h ↦ discr_ne_zero K ?_
rwa [h, Nat.cast_zero, abs_nonpos_iff] at hK
have h₂ : 1 < 3 * π / 4 := by
rw [_root_.lt_div_iff (by positivity), ← _root_.div_lt_iff' (by positivity), one_mul]
linarith [Real.pi_gt_three]
obtain h | h := lt_or_le 1 (finrank ℚ K)
· apply le_max_of_le_right
rw [Nat.le_floor_iff]
· have h := le_trans (abs_discr_ge h) (Int.cast_le.mpr hK)
contrapose! h
rw [← Real.rpow_natCast]
rw [Real.log_div_log] at h
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left
(Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt h₂ h) (by positivity : (0:ℝ) < 4 / 9))
rw [Real.rpow_logb (lt_trans zero_lt_one h₂) (ne_of_gt h₂) (by positivity), ← mul_assoc,
← inv_div, inv_mul_cancel (by norm_num), one_mul, Int.cast_natCast]
· refine div_nonneg (Real.log_nonneg ?_) (Real.log_nonneg (le_of_lt h₂))
rw [mul_comm, ← mul_div_assoc, _root_.le_div_iff (by positivity), one_mul,
← _root_.div_le_iff (by positivity)]
exact le_trans (by norm_num) (Nat.one_le_cast.mpr (Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero.mpr h_nz))
· exact le_max_of_le_left h
/-- If `|discr K| ≤ N` then the Minkowski bound of `K` is less than `boundOfDiscrBdd`. -/
theorem minkowskiBound_lt_boundOfDiscBdd : minkowskiBound K ↑1 < boundOfDiscBdd N := by
have : boundOfDiscBdd N - 1 < boundOfDiscBdd N := by
simp_rw [boundOfDiscBdd, add_tsub_cancel_right, lt_add_iff_pos_right, zero_lt_one]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (coe_lt_coe.mpr this)
rw [minkowskiBound, volume_fundamentalDomain_fractionalIdealLatticeBasis, boundOfDiscBdd,
add_tsub_cancel_right, Units.val_one, FractionalIdeal.absNorm_one, Rat.cast_one,
ENNReal.ofReal_one, one_mul, mixedEmbedding.finrank, volume_fundamentalDomain_latticeBasis,
coe_mul, ENNReal.coe_pow, coe_ofNat, show sqrt N = (1:ℝ≥0∞) * sqrt N by rw [one_mul]]
gcongr
· exact pow_le_one _ (by positivity) (by norm_num)
· rwa [sqrt_le_sqrt, ← NNReal.coe_le_coe, coe_nnnorm, Int.norm_eq_abs, ← Int.cast_abs,
NNReal.coe_natCast, ← Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_le]
· exact one_le_two
· exact rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd hK
theorem natDegree_le_rankOfDiscrBdd (a : 𝓞 K) (h : ℚ⟮(a : K)⟯ = ⊤) :
natDegree (minpoly ℤ (a : K)) ≤ rankOfDiscrBdd N := by
rw [Field.primitive_element_iff_minpoly_natDegree_eq,
minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ a.isIntegral_coe,
(minpoly.monic a.isIntegral_coe).natDegree_map] at h
exact h.symm ▸ rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd hK
variable (N)
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/NumberField/Discriminant.lean | 329 | 370 | theorem finite_of_discr_bdd_of_isReal :
{K : { F : IntermediateField ℚ A // FiniteDimensional ℚ F} |
haveI : NumberField K := @NumberField.mk _ _ inferInstance K.prop
{w : InfinitePlace K | IsReal w}.Nonempty ∧ |discr K| ≤ N }.Finite := by |
-- The bound on the degree of the generating polynomials
let D := rankOfDiscrBdd N
-- The bound on the Minkowski bound
let B := boundOfDiscBdd N
-- The bound on the coefficients of the generating polynomials
let C := Nat.ceil ((max B 1) ^ D * Nat.choose D (D / 2))
refine finite_of_finite_generating_set A _ (bUnion_roots_finite (algebraMap ℤ A) D
(Set.finite_Icc (-C : ℤ) C)) (fun ⟨K, hK₀⟩ ⟨hK₁, hK₂⟩ ↦ ?_)
-- We now need to prove that each field is generated by an element of the union of the rootset
simp_rw [Set.mem_iUnion]
haveI : NumberField K := @NumberField.mk _ _ inferInstance hK₀
obtain ⟨w₀, hw₀⟩ := hK₁
suffices minkowskiBound K ↑1 < (convexBodyLTFactor K) * B by
obtain ⟨x, hx₁, hx₂⟩ := exists_primitive_element_lt_of_isReal K hw₀ this
have hx := x.isIntegral_coe
refine ⟨x, ⟨⟨minpoly ℤ (x : K), ⟨?_, fun i ↦ ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· exact natDegree_le_rankOfDiscrBdd hK₂ x hx₁
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, ← abs_le, ← @Int.cast_le ℝ]
refine (Eq.trans_le ?_ <| Embeddings.coeff_bdd_of_norm_le
((le_iff_le (x : K) _).mp (fun w ↦ le_of_lt (hx₂ w))) i).trans ?_
· rw [minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hx, coeff_map, eq_intCast,
Int.norm_cast_rat, Int.norm_eq_abs, Int.cast_abs]
· refine le_trans ?_ (Nat.le_ceil _)
rw [show max ↑(max (B:ℝ≥0) 1) (1:ℝ) = max (B:ℝ) 1 by simp, val_eq_coe, NNReal.coe_mul,
NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_one, NNReal.coe_natCast]
gcongr
· exact le_max_right _ 1
· exact rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd hK₂
· exact (Nat.choose_le_choose _ (rank_le_rankOfDiscrBdd hK₂)).trans
(Nat.choose_le_middle _ _)
· refine mem_rootSet.mpr ⟨minpoly.ne_zero hx, ?_⟩
exact (aeval_algebraMap_eq_zero_iff _ _ _).mpr (minpoly.aeval ℤ (x : K))
· rw [← (IntermediateField.lift_injective _).eq_iff, eq_comm] at hx₁
convert hx₁ <;> simp
have := one_le_convexBodyLTFactor K
convert lt_of_le_of_lt (mul_right_mono (coe_le_coe.mpr this))
(ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left' (by positivity) coe_ne_top (minkowskiBound_lt_boundOfDiscBdd hK₂))
simp_rw [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.