Context stringlengths 295 65.3k | file_name stringlengths 21 74 | start int64 14 1.41k | end int64 20 1.41k | theorem stringlengths 27 1.42k | proof stringlengths 0 4.57k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Bundle
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Topology.CompactOpen
import Mathlib.Topology.PartialHomeomorph
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Trivializations
## Main definitions
### Basic definitions
* `Trivialization F p` : structure extending partial homeomorphisms, defining a local
trivialization of a topological space `Z` with projection `p` and fiber `F`.
* `Pretrivialization F proj` : trivialization as a partial equivalence, mainly used when the
topology on the total space has not yet been defined.
### Operations on bundles
We provide the following operations on `Trivialization`s.
* `Trivialization.compHomeomorph`: given a local trivialization `e` of a fiber bundle
`p : Z → B` and a homeomorphism `h : Z' ≃ₜ Z`, returns a local trivialization of the fiber bundle
`p ∘ h`.
## Implementation notes
Previously, in mathlib, there was a structure `topological_vector_bundle.trivialization` which
extended another structure `topological_fiber_bundle.trivialization` by a linearity hypothesis. As
of PR https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib3/pull/17359, we have changed this to a single structure
`Trivialization` (no namespace), together with a mixin class `Trivialization.IsLinear`.
This permits all the *data* of a vector bundle to be held at the level of fiber bundles, so that the
same trivializations can underlie an object's structure as (say) a vector bundle over `ℂ` and as a
vector bundle over `ℝ`, as well as its structure simply as a fiber bundle.
This might be a little surprising, given the general trend of the library to ever-increased
bundling. But in this case the typical motivation for more bundling does not apply: there is no
algebraic or order structure on the whole type of linear (say) trivializations of a bundle.
Indeed, since trivializations only have meaning on their base sets (taking junk values outside), the
type of linear trivializations is not even particularly well-behaved.
-/
open TopologicalSpace Filter Set Bundle Function
open scoped Topology
variable {B : Type*} (F : Type*) {E : B → Type*}
variable {Z : Type*} [TopologicalSpace B] [TopologicalSpace F] {proj : Z → B}
/-- This structure contains the information left for a local trivialization (which is implemented
below as `Trivialization F proj`) if the total space has not been given a topology, but we
have a topology on both the fiber and the base space. Through the construction
`topological_fiber_prebundle F proj` it will be possible to promote a
`Pretrivialization F proj` to a `Trivialization F proj`. -/
structure Pretrivialization (proj : Z → B) extends PartialEquiv Z (B × F) where
open_target : IsOpen target
baseSet : Set B
open_baseSet : IsOpen baseSet
source_eq : source = proj ⁻¹' baseSet
target_eq : target = baseSet ×ˢ univ
proj_toFun : ∀ p ∈ source, (toFun p).1 = proj p
namespace Pretrivialization
variable {F}
variable (e : Pretrivialization F proj) {x : Z}
/-- Coercion of a pretrivialization to a function. We don't use `e.toFun` in the `CoeFun` instance
because it is actually `e.toPartialEquiv.toFun`, so `simp` will apply lemmas about
`toPartialEquiv`. While we may want to switch to this behavior later, doing it mid-port will break a
lot of proofs. -/
@[coe] def toFun' : Z → (B × F) := e.toFun
instance : CoeFun (Pretrivialization F proj) fun _ => Z → B × F := ⟨toFun'⟩
@[ext]
lemma ext' (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) (h₁ : e.toPartialEquiv = e'.toPartialEquiv)
(h₂ : e.baseSet = e'.baseSet) : e = e' := by
cases e; cases e'; congr
-- TODO: move `ext` here?
lemma ext {e e' : Pretrivialization F proj} (h₁ : ∀ x, e x = e' x)
(h₂ : ∀ x, e.toPartialEquiv.symm x = e'.toPartialEquiv.symm x) (h₃ : e.baseSet = e'.baseSet) :
e = e' := by
ext1 <;> [ext1; exact h₃]
· apply h₁
· apply h₂
· rw [e.source_eq, e'.source_eq, h₃]
/-- If the fiber is nonempty, then the projection also is. -/
lemma toPartialEquiv_injective [Nonempty F] :
Injective (toPartialEquiv : Pretrivialization F proj → PartialEquiv Z (B × F)) := by
refine fun e e' h ↦ ext' _ _ h ?_
simpa only [fst_image_prod, univ_nonempty, target_eq]
using congr_arg (Prod.fst '' PartialEquiv.target ·) h
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_coe : ⇑e.toPartialEquiv = e :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_fst (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.proj_toFun x ex
theorem mem_source : x ∈ e.source ↔ proj x ∈ e.baseSet := by rw [e.source_eq, mem_preimage]
theorem coe_fst' (ex : proj x ∈ e.baseSet) : (e x).1 = proj x :=
e.coe_fst (e.mem_source.2 ex)
protected theorem eqOn : EqOn (Prod.fst ∘ e) proj e.source := fun _ hx => e.coe_fst hx
theorem mk_proj_snd (ex : x ∈ e.source) : (proj x, (e x).2) = e x :=
Prod.ext (e.coe_fst ex).symm rfl
theorem mk_proj_snd' (ex : proj x ∈ e.baseSet) : (proj x, (e x).2) = e x :=
Prod.ext (e.coe_fst' ex).symm rfl
/-- Composition of inverse and coercion from the subtype of the target. -/
def setSymm : e.target → Z :=
e.target.restrict e.toPartialEquiv.symm
theorem mem_target {x : B × F} : x ∈ e.target ↔ x.1 ∈ e.baseSet := by
rw [e.target_eq, prod_univ, mem_preimage]
theorem proj_symm_apply {x : B × F} (hx : x ∈ e.target) : proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm x) = x.1 := by
have := (e.coe_fst (e.map_target hx)).symm
rwa [← e.coe_coe, e.right_inv hx] at this
theorem proj_symm_apply' {b : B} {x : F} (hx : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, x)) = b :=
e.proj_symm_apply (e.mem_target.2 hx)
theorem proj_surjOn_baseSet [Nonempty F] : Set.SurjOn proj e.source e.baseSet := fun b hb =>
let ⟨y⟩ := ‹Nonempty F›
⟨e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, y), e.toPartialEquiv.map_target <| e.mem_target.2 hb,
e.proj_symm_apply' hb⟩
theorem apply_symm_apply {x : B × F} (hx : x ∈ e.target) : e (e.toPartialEquiv.symm x) = x :=
e.toPartialEquiv.right_inv hx
theorem apply_symm_apply' {b : B} {x : F} (hx : b ∈ e.baseSet) :
e (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (b, x)) = (b, x) :=
e.apply_symm_apply (e.mem_target.2 hx)
theorem symm_apply_apply {x : Z} (hx : x ∈ e.source) : e.toPartialEquiv.symm (e x) = x :=
e.toPartialEquiv.left_inv hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem symm_apply_mk_proj {x : Z} (ex : x ∈ e.source) :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm (proj x, (e x).2) = x := by
rw [← e.coe_fst ex, ← e.coe_coe, e.left_inv ex]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_symm_proj_baseSet :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' (proj ⁻¹' e.baseSet) ∩ e.target = e.target := by
refine inter_eq_right.mpr fun x hx => ?_
simp only [mem_preimage, PartialEquiv.invFun_as_coe, e.proj_symm_apply hx]
exact e.mem_target.mp hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_symm_proj_inter (s : Set B) :
e.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' (proj ⁻¹' s) ∩ e.baseSet ×ˢ univ = (s ∩ e.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
suffices x ∈ e.baseSet → (proj (e.toPartialEquiv.symm (x, y)) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s) by
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_inter_iff, and_true, mem_univ, and_congr_left_iff]
intro h
rw [e.proj_symm_apply' h]
theorem target_inter_preimage_symm_source_eq (e f : Pretrivialization F proj) :
f.target ∩ f.toPartialEquiv.symm ⁻¹' e.source = (e.baseSet ∩ f.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [inter_comm, f.target_eq, e.source_eq, f.preimage_symm_proj_inter]
theorem trans_source (e f : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(f.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e.toPartialEquiv).source = (e.baseSet ∩ f.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, PartialEquiv.symm_source, e.target_inter_preimage_symm_source_eq]
theorem symm_trans_symm (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).symm
= e'.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e.toPartialEquiv := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_symm_eq_symm_trans_symm, PartialEquiv.symm_symm]
| Mathlib/Topology/FiberBundle/Trivialization.lean | 189 | 195 | theorem symm_trans_source_eq (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).source = (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by | rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source, e'.source_eq, PartialEquiv.symm_source, e.target_eq, inter_comm,
e.preimage_symm_proj_inter, inter_comm]
theorem symm_trans_target_eq (e e' : Pretrivialization F proj) :
(e.toPartialEquiv.symm.trans e'.toPartialEquiv).target = (e.baseSet ∩ e'.baseSet) ×ˢ univ := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Vladimir Goryachev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Vladimir Goryachev, Kyle Miller, Kim Morrison, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
/-!
# Counting on ℕ
This file defines the `count` function, which gives, for any predicate on the natural numbers,
"how many numbers under `k` satisfy this predicate?".
We then prove several expected lemmas about `count`, relating it to the cardinality of other
objects, and helping to evaluate it for specific `k`.
-/
assert_not_imported Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
assert_not_exists Ring
open Finset
namespace Nat
variable (p : ℕ → Prop)
section Count
variable [DecidablePred p]
/-- Count the number of naturals `k < n` satisfying `p k`. -/
def count (n : ℕ) : ℕ :=
(List.range n).countP p
@[simp]
theorem count_zero : count p 0 = 0 := by
rw [count, List.range_zero, List.countP, List.countP.go]
/-- A fintype instance for the set relevant to `Nat.count`. Locally an instance in locale `count` -/
def CountSet.fintype (n : ℕ) : Fintype { i // i < n ∧ p i } := by
apply Fintype.ofFinset {x ∈ range n | p x}
intro x
rw [mem_filter, mem_range]
rfl
scoped[Count] attribute [instance] Nat.CountSet.fintype
open Count
theorem count_eq_card_filter_range (n : ℕ) : count p n = #{x ∈ range n | p x} := by
rw [count, List.countP_eq_length_filter]
rfl
/-- `count p n` can be expressed as the cardinality of `{k // k < n ∧ p k}`. -/
theorem count_eq_card_fintype (n : ℕ) : count p n = Fintype.card { k : ℕ // k < n ∧ p k } := by
rw [count_eq_card_filter_range, ← Fintype.card_ofFinset, ← CountSet.fintype]
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Count.lean | 60 | 62 | theorem count_le {n : ℕ} : count p n ≤ n := by | rw [count_eq_card_filter_range]
exact (card_filter_le _ _).trans_eq (card_range _) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 48 | 48 | theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by | simp [xgcdAux] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,097 | 1,104 | theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by | rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) := |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.Multiset
/-!
# GCD and LCM operations on finsets
## Main definitions
- `Finset.gcd` - the greatest common denominator of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
- `Finset.lcm` - the least common multiple of a `Finset` of elements of a `GCDMonoid`
## Implementation notes
Many of the proofs use the lemmas `gcd_def` and `lcm_def`, which relate `Finset.gcd`
and `Finset.lcm` to `Multiset.gcd` and `Multiset.lcm`.
TODO: simplify with a tactic and `Data.Finset.Lattice`
## Tags
finset, gcd
-/
variable {ι α β γ : Type*}
namespace Finset
open Multiset
variable [CancelCommMonoidWithZero α] [NormalizedGCDMonoid α]
/-! ### lcm -/
section lcm
/-- Least common multiple of a finite set -/
def lcm (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.lcm 1 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem lcm_def : s.lcm f = (s.1.map f).lcm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lcm_empty : (∅ : Finset β).lcm f = 1 :=
fold_empty
@[simp]
theorem lcm_dvd_iff {a : α} : s.lcm f ∣ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.lcm_dvd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem lcm_dvd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ a) → s.lcm f ∣ a :=
lcm_dvd_iff.2
theorem dvd_lcm {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : f b ∣ s.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
@[simp]
theorem lcm_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (f b) (s.lcm f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(lcm_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.lcm f) (Multiset.normalize_lcm (s.1.map f))).2 (dvd_lcm h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem lcm_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).lcm f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.lcm_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_lcm : normalize (s.lcm f) = s.lcm f := by simp [lcm_def]
theorem lcm_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).lcm f = GCDMonoid.lcm (s₁.lcm f) (s₂.lcm f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, lcm_empty, lcm_one_left, normalize_lcm])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, lcm_insert, lcm_insert, ih, lcm_assoc]
theorem lcm_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.lcm f = s₂.lcm g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem lcm_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.lcm f ∣ s.lcm g :=
lcm_dvd fun b hb ↦ (h b hb).trans (dvd_lcm hb)
theorem lcm_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁.lcm f ∣ s₂.lcm f :=
lcm_dvd fun _ hb ↦ dvd_lcm (h hb)
theorem lcm_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).lcm f = s.lcm (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem lcm_eq_lcm_image [DecidableEq α] : s.lcm f = (s.image f).lcm id :=
Eq.symm <| lcm_image _
theorem lcm_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial α] : s.lcm f = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ f '' s := by
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, lcm_def, Multiset.lcm_eq_zero_iff, Set.mem_image, mem_coe, ←
Finset.mem_def]
end lcm
/-! ### gcd -/
section gcd
/-- Greatest common divisor of a finite set -/
def gcd (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) : α :=
s.fold GCDMonoid.gcd 0 f
variable {s s₁ s₂ : Finset β} {f : β → α}
theorem gcd_def : s.gcd f = (s.1.map f).gcd :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem gcd_empty : (∅ : Finset β).gcd f = 0 :=
fold_empty
theorem dvd_gcd_iff {a : α} : a ∣ s.gcd f ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b := by
apply Iff.trans Multiset.dvd_gcd
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, and_imp, exists_imp]
exact ⟨fun k b hb ↦ k _ _ hb rfl, fun k a' b hb h ↦ h ▸ k _ hb⟩
theorem gcd_dvd {b : β} (hb : b ∈ s) : s.gcd f ∣ f b :=
dvd_gcd_iff.1 dvd_rfl _ hb
theorem dvd_gcd {a : α} : (∀ b ∈ s, a ∣ f b) → a ∣ s.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd_iff.2
@[simp]
theorem gcd_insert [DecidableEq β] {b : β} :
(insert b s : Finset β).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (f b) (s.gcd f) := by
by_cases h : b ∈ s
· rw [insert_eq_of_mem h,
(gcd_eq_right_iff (f b) (s.gcd f) (Multiset.normalize_gcd (s.1.map f))).2 (gcd_dvd h)]
apply fold_insert h
@[simp]
theorem gcd_singleton {b : β} : ({b} : Finset β).gcd f = normalize (f b) :=
Multiset.gcd_singleton
@[local simp] -- This will later be provable by other `simp` lemmas.
theorem normalize_gcd : normalize (s.gcd f) = s.gcd f := by simp [gcd_def]
theorem gcd_union [DecidableEq β] : (s₁ ∪ s₂).gcd f = GCDMonoid.gcd (s₁.gcd f) (s₂.gcd f) :=
Finset.induction_on s₁ (by rw [empty_union, gcd_empty, gcd_zero_left, normalize_gcd])
fun a s _ ih ↦ by rw [insert_union, gcd_insert, gcd_insert, ih, gcd_assoc]
theorem gcd_congr {f g : β → α} (hs : s₁ = s₂) (hfg : ∀ a ∈ s₂, f a = g a) :
s₁.gcd f = s₂.gcd g := by
subst hs
exact Finset.fold_congr hfg
theorem gcd_mono_fun {g : β → α} (h : ∀ b ∈ s, f b ∣ g b) : s.gcd f ∣ s.gcd g :=
dvd_gcd fun b hb ↦ (gcd_dvd hb).trans (h b hb)
theorem gcd_mono (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₂.gcd f ∣ s₁.gcd f :=
dvd_gcd fun _ hb ↦ gcd_dvd (h hb)
theorem gcd_image [DecidableEq β] {g : γ → β} (s : Finset γ) :
(s.image g).gcd f = s.gcd (f ∘ g) := by
classical induction s using Finset.induction <;> simp [*]
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_image [DecidableEq α] : s.gcd f = (s.image f).gcd id :=
Eq.symm <| gcd_image _
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff : s.gcd f = 0 ↔ ∀ x : β, x ∈ s → f x = 0 := by
rw [gcd_def, Multiset.gcd_eq_zero_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· intro b bs
apply h (f b)
simp only [Multiset.mem_map, mem_def.1 bs]
use b
simp only [mem_def.1 bs, eq_self_iff_true, and_self]
· intro a as
rw [Multiset.mem_map] at as
rcases as with ⟨b, ⟨bs, rfl⟩⟩
apply h b (mem_def.1 bs)
| Mathlib/Algebra/GCDMonoid/Finset.lean | 189 | 192 | theorem gcd_eq_gcd_filter_ne_zero [DecidablePred fun x : β ↦ f x = 0] :
s.gcd f = {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}.gcd f := by | classical
trans ({x ∈ s | f x = 0} ∪ {x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0}).gcd f |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Trace.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Norm.Basic
/-!
# Discriminant of a family of vectors
Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `b`, an `ι`-indexed family of elements of `B`, we define the
*discriminant* of `b` as the determinant of the matrix whose `(i j)`-th element is the trace of
`b i * b j`.
## Main definition
* `Algebra.discr A b` : the discriminant of `b : ι → B`.
## Main results
* `Algebra.discr_zero_of_not_linearIndependent` : if `b` is not linear independent, then
`Algebra.discr A b = 0`.
* `Algebra.discr_of_matrix_vecMul` and `Algebra.discr_of_matrix_mulVec` : formulas relating
`Algebra.discr A ι b` with `Algebra.discr A (b ᵥ* P.map (algebraMap A B))` and
`Algebra.discr A (P.map (algebraMap A B) *ᵥ b)`.
* `Algebra.discr_not_zero_of_basis` : over a field, if `b` is a basis, then
`Algebra.discr K b ≠ 0`.
* `Algebra.discr_eq_det_embeddingsMatrixReindex_pow_two` : if `L/K` is a field extension and
`b : ι → L`, then `discr K b` is the square of the determinant of the matrix whose `(i, j)`
coefficient is `σⱼ (b i)`, where `σⱼ : L →ₐ[K] E` is the embedding in an algebraically closed
field `E` corresponding to `j : ι` via a bijection `e : ι ≃ (L →ₐ[K] E)`.
* `Algebra.discr_powerBasis_eq_prod` : the discriminant of a power basis.
* `Algebra.discr_isIntegral` : if `K` and `L` are fields and `IsScalarTower R K L`, if
`b : ι → L` satisfies `∀ i, IsIntegral R (b i)`, then `IsIntegral R (discr K b)`.
* `Algebra.discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin` : let `K` be the fraction field of an integrally
closed domain `R` and let `L` be a finite separable extension of `K`. Let `B : PowerBasis K L`
be such that `IsIntegral R B.gen`. Then for all, `z : L` we have
`(discr K B.basis) • z ∈ adjoin R ({B.gen} : Set L)`.
## Implementation details
Our definition works for any `A`-algebra `B`, but note that if `B` is not free as an `A`-module,
then `trace A B = 0` by definition, so `discr A b = 0` for any `b`.
-/
universe u v w z
open scoped Matrix
open Matrix Module Fintype Polynomial Finset IntermediateField
namespace Algebra
variable (A : Type u) {B : Type v} (C : Type z) {ι : Type w} [DecidableEq ι]
variable [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B] [CommRing C] [Algebra A C]
section Discr
/-- Given an `A`-algebra `B` and `b`, an `ι`-indexed family of elements of `B`, we define
`discr A ι b` as the determinant of `traceMatrix A ι b`. -/
-- Porting note: using `[DecidableEq ι]` instead of `by classical...` did not work in
-- mathlib3.
noncomputable def discr (A : Type u) {B : Type v} [CommRing A] [CommRing B] [Algebra A B]
[Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) := (traceMatrix A b).det
theorem discr_def [Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) : discr A b = (traceMatrix A b).det := rfl
variable {A C} in
/-- Mapping a family of vectors along an `AlgEquiv` preserves the discriminant. -/
theorem discr_eq_discr_of_algEquiv [Fintype ι] (b : ι → B) (f : B ≃ₐ[A] C) :
Algebra.discr A b = Algebra.discr A (f ∘ b) := by
rw [discr_def]; congr; ext
simp_rw [traceMatrix_apply, traceForm_apply, Function.comp, ← map_mul f, trace_eq_of_algEquiv]
variable {ι' : Type*} [Fintype ι'] [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι']
section Basic
@[simp]
theorem discr_reindex (b : Basis ι A B) (f : ι ≃ ι') : discr A (b ∘ ⇑f.symm) = discr A b := by
classical rw [← Basis.coe_reindex, discr_def, traceMatrix_reindex, det_reindex_self, ← discr_def]
/-- If `b` is not linear independent, then `Algebra.discr A b = 0`. -/
theorem discr_zero_of_not_linearIndependent [IsDomain A] {b : ι → B}
(hli : ¬LinearIndependent A b) : discr A b = 0 := by
classical
obtain ⟨g, hg, i, hi⟩ := Fintype.not_linearIndependent_iff.1 hli
have : (traceMatrix A b) *ᵥ g = 0 := by
ext i
have : ∀ j, (trace A B) (b i * b j) * g j = (trace A B) (g j • b j * b i) := by
intro j
simp [mul_comm]
simp only [mulVec, dotProduct, traceMatrix_apply, Pi.zero_apply, traceForm_apply, fun j =>
this j, ← map_sum, ← sum_mul, hg, zero_mul, LinearMap.map_zero]
by_contra h
rw [discr_def] at h
simp [Matrix.eq_zero_of_mulVec_eq_zero h this] at hi
variable {A}
/-- Relation between `Algebra.discr A ι b` and
`Algebra.discr A (b ᵥ* P.map (algebraMap A B))`. -/
theorem discr_of_matrix_vecMul (b : ι → B) (P : Matrix ι ι A) :
discr A (b ᵥ* P.map (algebraMap A B)) = P.det ^ 2 * discr A b := by
rw [discr_def, traceMatrix_of_matrix_vecMul, det_mul, det_mul, det_transpose, mul_comm, ←
mul_assoc, discr_def, pow_two]
/-- Relation between `Algebra.discr A ι b` and
`Algebra.discr A ((P.map (algebraMap A B)) *ᵥ b)`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Discriminant.lean | 113 | 116 | theorem discr_of_matrix_mulVec (b : ι → B) (P : Matrix ι ι A) :
discr A (P.map (algebraMap A B) *ᵥ b) = P.det ^ 2 * discr A b := by | rw [discr_def, traceMatrix_of_matrix_mulVec, det_mul, det_mul, det_transpose, mul_comm, ←
mul_assoc, discr_def, pow_two] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Induced
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.AE
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Measure spaces
This file defines measure spaces, the almost-everywhere filter and ae_measurable functions.
See `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for their properties and for extended documentation.
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the sum of the measures of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, an outer measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
See the documentation of `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpace` for ways to construct measures and proving
that two measure are equal.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
This file does not import `MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Basic`, but only `MeasurableSpace.Defs`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal
open Filter hiding map
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
namespace MeasureTheory
/-- A measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
The measure of a set `s`, denoted `μ s`, is an extended nonnegative real. The real-valued version
is written `μ.real s`.
-/
structure Measure (α : Type*) [MeasurableSpace α] extends OuterMeasure α where
m_iUnion ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ : (∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)) → Pairwise (Disjoint on f) →
toOuterMeasure (⋃ i, f i) = ∑' i, toOuterMeasure (f i)
trim_le : toOuterMeasure.trim ≤ toOuterMeasure
/-- Notation for `Measure` with respect to a non-standard σ-algebra in the domain. -/
scoped notation "Measure[" mα "] " α:arg => @Measure α mα
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_injective [MeasurableSpace α] :
Injective (toOuterMeasure : Measure α → OuterMeasure α)
| ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance Measure.instFunLike [MeasurableSpace α] : FunLike (Measure α) (Set α) ℝ≥0∞ where
coe μ := μ.toOuterMeasure
coe_injective' | ⟨_, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _⟩, h => toOuterMeasure_injective <| DFunLike.coe_injective h
instance Measure.instOuterMeasureClass [MeasurableSpace α] : OuterMeasureClass (Measure α) α where
measure_empty m := measure_empty (μ := m.toOuterMeasure)
measure_iUnion_nat_le m := m.iUnion_nat
measure_mono m := m.mono
/-- The real-valued version of a measure. Maps infinite measure sets to zero. Use as `μ.real s`.
The API is developed in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Real`. -/
protected def Measure.real {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) : ℝ :=
(μ s).toReal
theorem measureReal_def {α : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.real s = (μ s).toReal := rfl
alias Measure.real_def := measureReal_def
section
variable [MeasurableSpace α] {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
namespace Measure
theorem trimmed (μ : Measure α) : μ.toOuterMeasure.trim = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
le_antisymm μ.trim_le μ.1.le_trim
/-! ### General facts about measures -/
/-- Obtain a measure by giving a countably additive function that sends `∅` to `0`. -/
def ofMeasurable (m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞) (m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0)
(mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)) :
Measure α :=
{ toOuterMeasure := inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0
m_iUnion := fun f hf hd =>
show inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (iUnion f) = ∑' i, inducedOuterMeasure m _ m0 (f i) by
rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU, mU hf hd]
congr; funext n; rw [inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU]
trim_le := le_inducedOuterMeasure.2 fun s hs ↦ by
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq _ hs, inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs] }
theorem ofMeasurable_apply {m : ∀ s : Set α, MeasurableSet s → ℝ≥0∞}
{m0 : m ∅ MeasurableSet.empty = 0}
{mU :
∀ ⦃f : ℕ → Set α⦄ (h : ∀ i, MeasurableSet (f i)),
Pairwise (Disjoint on f) → m (⋃ i, f i) (MeasurableSet.iUnion h) = ∑' i, m (f i) (h i)}
(s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : ofMeasurable m m0 mU s = m s hs :=
inducedOuterMeasure_eq m0 mU hs
@[ext]
theorem ext (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s = μ₂ s) : μ₁ = μ₂ :=
toOuterMeasure_injective <| by
rw [← trimmed, OuterMeasure.trim_congr (h _), trimmed]
theorem ext_iff' : μ₁ = μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s = μ₂ s :=
⟨by rintro rfl s; rfl, fun h ↦ Measure.ext (fun s _ ↦ h s)⟩
theorem outerMeasure_le_iff {m : OuterMeasure α} : m ≤ μ.1 ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → m s ≤ μ s := by
simpa only [μ.trimmed] using OuterMeasure.le_trim_iff (m₂ := μ.1)
end Measure
@[simp] theorem Measure.coe_toOuterMeasure (μ : Measure α) : ⇑μ.toOuterMeasure = μ := rfl
theorem Measure.toOuterMeasure_apply (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ.toOuterMeasure s = μ s :=
rfl
theorem measure_eq_trim (s : Set α) : μ s = μ.toOuterMeasure.trim s := by
rw [μ.trimmed, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpaceDef.lean | 161 | 162 | theorem measure_eq_iInf (s : Set α) : μ s = ⨅ (t) (_ : s ⊆ t) (_ : MeasurableSet t), μ t := by | rw [measure_eq_trim, OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf, μ.coe_toOuterMeasure] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Tactic.Tauto
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Util.Delaborators
import Mathlib.Tactic.Lift
/-!
# Basic properties of sets
Sets in Lean are homogeneous; all their elements have the same type. Sets whose elements
have type `X` are thus defined as `Set X := X → Prop`. Note that this function need not
be decidable. The definition is in the module `Mathlib.Data.Set.Defs`.
This file provides some basic definitions related to sets and functions not present in the
definitions file, as well as extra lemmas for functions defined in the definitions file and
`Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations` (empty set, univ, union, intersection, insert, singleton,
set-theoretic difference, complement, and powerset).
Note that a set is a term, not a type. There is a coercion from `Set α` to `Type*` sending
`s` to the corresponding subtype `↥s`.
See also the file `SetTheory/ZFC.lean`, which contains an encoding of ZFC set theory in Lean.
## Main definitions
Notation used here:
- `f : α → β` is a function,
- `s : Set α` and `s₁ s₂ : Set α` are subsets of `α`
- `t : Set β` is a subset of `β`.
Definitions in the file:
* `Nonempty s : Prop` : the predicate `s ≠ ∅`. Note that this is the preferred way to express the
fact that `s` has an element (see the Implementation Notes).
* `inclusion s₁ s₂ : ↥s₁ → ↥s₂` : the map `↥s₁ → ↥s₂` induced by an inclusion `s₁ ⊆ s₂`.
## Notation
* `sᶜ` for the complement of `s`
## Implementation notes
* `s.Nonempty` is to be preferred to `s ≠ ∅` or `∃ x, x ∈ s`. It has the advantage that
the `s.Nonempty` dot notation can be used.
* For `s : Set α`, do not use `Subtype s`. Instead use `↥s` or `(s : Type*)` or `s`.
## Tags
set, sets, subset, subsets, union, intersection, insert, singleton, complement, powerset
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
/-! ### Set coercion to a type -/
open Function
universe u v
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {s t : Set α}
instance instBooleanAlgebra : BooleanAlgebra (Set α) :=
{ (inferInstance : BooleanAlgebra (α → Prop)) with
sup := (· ∪ ·),
le := (· ≤ ·),
lt := fun s t => s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s,
inf := (· ∩ ·),
bot := ∅,
compl := (·ᶜ),
top := univ,
sdiff := (· \ ·) }
instance : HasSSubset (Set α) :=
⟨(· < ·)⟩
@[simp]
theorem top_eq_univ : (⊤ : Set α) = univ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_empty : (⊥ : Set α) = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sup_eq_union : ((· ⊔ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∪ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem inf_eq_inter : ((· ⊓ ·) : Set α → Set α → Set α) = (· ∩ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem le_eq_subset : ((· ≤ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊆ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lt_eq_ssubset : ((· < ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) = (· ⊂ ·) :=
rfl
theorem le_iff_subset : s ≤ t ↔ s ⊆ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_iff_ssubset : s < t ↔ s ⊂ t :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_root_.LE.le.subset, _root_.HasSubset.Subset.le⟩ := le_iff_subset
alias ⟨_root_.LT.lt.ssubset, _root_.HasSSubset.SSubset.lt⟩ := lt_iff_ssubset
instance PiSetCoe.canLift (ι : Type u) (α : ι → Type v) [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (∀ i : s, α i) (∀ i, α i) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSubtype.canLift ι α s
instance PiSetCoe.canLift' (ι : Type u) (α : Type v) [Nonempty α] (s : Set ι) :
CanLift (s → α) (ι → α) (fun f i => f i) fun _ => True :=
PiSetCoe.canLift ι (fun _ => α) s
end Set
section SetCoe
variable {α : Type u}
instance (s : Set α) : CoeTC s α := ⟨fun x => x.1⟩
theorem Set.coe_eq_subtype (s : Set α) : ↥s = { x // x ∈ s } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.coe_setOf (p : α → Prop) : ↥{ x | p x } = { x // p x } :=
rfl
theorem SetCoe.forall {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} : (∀ x : s, p x) ↔ ∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.forall
theorem SetCoe.exists {s : Set α} {p : s → Prop} :
(∃ x : s, p x) ↔ ∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p ⟨x, h⟩ :=
Subtype.exists
theorem SetCoe.exists' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∃ (x : _) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∃ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.exists _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
theorem SetCoe.forall' {s : Set α} {p : ∀ x, x ∈ s → Prop} :
(∀ (x) (h : x ∈ s), p x h) ↔ ∀ x : s, p x.1 x.2 :=
(@SetCoe.forall _ _ fun x => p x.1 x.2).symm
@[simp]
theorem set_coe_cast :
∀ {s t : Set α} (H' : s = t) (H : ↥s = ↥t) (x : s), cast H x = ⟨x.1, H' ▸ x.2⟩
| _, _, rfl, _, _ => rfl
theorem SetCoe.ext {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (a : α) = b → a = b :=
Subtype.eq
theorem SetCoe.ext_iff {s : Set α} {a b : s} : (↑a : α) = ↑b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro SetCoe.ext fun h => h ▸ rfl
end SetCoe
/-- See also `Subtype.prop` -/
theorem Subtype.mem {α : Type*} {s : Set α} (p : s) : (p : α) ∈ s :=
p.prop
/-- Duplicate of `Eq.subset'`, which currently has elaboration problems. -/
theorem Eq.subset {α} {s t : Set α} : s = t → s ⊆ t :=
fun h₁ _ h₂ => by rw [← h₁]; exact h₂
namespace Set
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {a b : α} {s s₁ s₂ t t₁ t₂ u : Set α}
instance : Inhabited (Set α) :=
⟨∅⟩
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_mem_of_subset {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hx : x ∈ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : x ∈ t :=
h hx
theorem forall_in_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ s, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ s, p a b := by
tauto
theorem setOf_injective : Function.Injective (@setOf α) := injective_id
theorem setOf_inj {p q : α → Prop} : { x | p x } = { x | q x } ↔ p = q := Iff.rfl
/-! ### Lemmas about `mem` and `setOf` -/
theorem mem_setOf {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∈ { x | p x } ↔ p a :=
Iff.rfl
/-- This lemma is intended for use with `rw` where a membership predicate is needed,
hence the explicit argument and the equality in the reverse direction from normal.
See also `Set.mem_setOf_eq` for the reverse direction applied to an argument. -/
theorem eq_mem_setOf (p : α → Prop) : p = (· ∈ {a | p a}) := rfl
/-- If `h : a ∈ {x | p x}` then `h.out : p x`. These are definitionally equal, but this can
nevertheless be useful for various reasons, e.g. to apply further projection notation or in an
argument to `simp`. -/
theorem _root_.Membership.mem.out {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (h : a ∈ { x | p x }) : p a :=
h
theorem nmem_setOf_iff {a : α} {p : α → Prop} : a ∉ { x | p x } ↔ ¬p a :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_mem_eq {s : Set α} : { x | x ∈ s } = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_set {s : Set α} : setOf s = s :=
rfl
theorem setOf_app_iff {p : α → Prop} {x : α} : { x | p x } x ↔ p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_def {a : α} {s : Set α} : a ∈ s ↔ s a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_bijective : Bijective (setOf : (α → Prop) → Set α) :=
bijective_id
theorem subset_setOf {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : s ⊆ setOf p ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s → p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_subset {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} : setOf p ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, p x → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_subset_setOf {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a } ⊆ { a | q a } ↔ ∀ a, p a → q a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem setOf_and {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∧ q a } = { a | p a } ∩ { a | q a } :=
rfl
theorem setOf_or {p q : α → Prop} : { a | p a ∨ q a } = { a | p a } ∪ { a | q a } :=
rfl
/-! ### Subset and strict subset relations -/
instance : IsRefl (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsRefl (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) :=
show IsAntisymm (Set α) (· ≤ ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsIrrefl (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsIrrefl (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsTrans (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsTrans (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊂ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· < ·) (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : Trans ((· ⊆ ·) : Set α → Set α → Prop) (· ⊂ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show Trans (· ≤ ·) (· < ·) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsAsymm (Set α) (· ⊂ ·) :=
show IsAsymm (Set α) (· < ·) by infer_instance
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder (Set α) (· ⊆ ·) (· ⊂ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Iff.rfl⟩
-- TODO(Jeremy): write a tactic to unfold specific instances of generic notation?
theorem subset_def : (s ⊆ t) = ∀ x, x ∈ s → x ∈ t :=
rfl
theorem ssubset_def : (s ⊂ t) = (s ⊆ t ∧ ¬t ⊆ s) :=
rfl
@[refl]
theorem Subset.refl (a : Set α) : a ⊆ a := fun _ => id
theorem Subset.rfl {s : Set α} : s ⊆ s :=
Subset.refl s
@[trans]
theorem Subset.trans {a b c : Set α} (ab : a ⊆ b) (bc : b ⊆ c) : a ⊆ c := fun _ h => bc <| ab h
@[trans]
theorem mem_of_eq_of_mem {x y : α} {s : Set α} (hx : x = y) (h : y ∈ s) : x ∈ s :=
hx.symm ▸ h
theorem Subset.antisymm {a b : Set α} (h₁ : a ⊆ b) (h₂ : b ⊆ a) : a = b :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨@h₁ _, @h₂ _⟩
theorem Subset.antisymm_iff {a b : Set α} : a = b ↔ a ⊆ b ∧ b ⊆ a :=
⟨fun e => ⟨e.subset, e.symm.subset⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => Subset.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
-- an alternative name
theorem eq_of_subset_of_subset {a b : Set α} : a ⊆ b → b ⊆ a → a = b :=
Subset.antisymm
theorem mem_of_subset_of_mem {s₁ s₂ : Set α} {a : α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : a ∈ s₁ → a ∈ s₂ :=
@h _
theorem not_mem_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : a ∉ t → a ∉ s :=
mt <| mem_of_subset_of_mem h
theorem not_subset : ¬s ⊆ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, a ∉ t := by
simp only [subset_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
theorem not_top_subset : ¬⊤ ⊆ s ↔ ∃ a, a ∉ s := by
simp [not_subset]
lemma eq_of_forall_subset_iff (h : ∀ u, s ⊆ u ↔ t ⊆ u) : s = t := eq_of_forall_ge_iff h
/-! ### Definition of strict subsets `s ⊂ t` and basic properties. -/
protected theorem eq_or_ssubset_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : s = t ∨ s ⊂ t :=
eq_or_lt_of_le h
theorem exists_of_ssubset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊂ t) : ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
not_subset.1 h.2
protected theorem ssubset_iff_subset_ne {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ s ≠ t :=
@lt_iff_le_and_ne (Set α) _ s t
theorem ssubset_iff_of_subset {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ⊂ t ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨exists_of_ssubset, fun ⟨_, hxt, hxs⟩ => ⟨h, fun h => hxs <| h hxt⟩⟩
theorem ssubset_iff_exists {s t : Set α} : s ⊂ t ↔ s ⊆ t ∧ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∉ s :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨h.le, Set.exists_of_ssubset h⟩, fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ ↦ (Set.ssubset_iff_of_subset h1).mpr h2⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_ssubset_of_subset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊂ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊆ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂.1 hs₂s₃, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₁s₂.2 (Subset.trans hs₂s₃ hs₃s₁)⟩
protected theorem ssubset_of_subset_of_ssubset {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (hs₁s₂ : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(hs₂s₃ : s₂ ⊂ s₃) : s₁ ⊂ s₃ :=
⟨Subset.trans hs₁s₂ hs₂s₃.1, fun hs₃s₁ => hs₂s₃.2 (Subset.trans hs₃s₁ hs₁s₂)⟩
theorem not_mem_empty (x : α) : ¬x ∈ (∅ : Set α) :=
id
theorem not_not_mem : ¬a ∉ s ↔ a ∈ s :=
not_not
/-! ### Non-empty sets -/
theorem nonempty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : Nonempty ↥s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_subtype
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.coe_sort⟩ := nonempty_coe_sort
theorem nonempty_def : s.Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem nonempty_of_mem {x} (h : x ∈ s) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨x, h⟩
theorem Nonempty.not_subset_empty : s.Nonempty → ¬s ⊆ ∅
| ⟨_, hx⟩, hs => hs hx
/-- Extract a witness from `s.Nonempty`. This function might be used instead of case analysis
on the argument. Note that it makes a proof depend on the `Classical.choice` axiom. -/
protected noncomputable def Nonempty.some (h : s.Nonempty) : α :=
Classical.choose h
protected theorem Nonempty.some_mem (h : s.Nonempty) : h.some ∈ s :=
Classical.choose_spec h
theorem Nonempty.mono (ht : s ⊆ t) (hs : s.Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
hs.imp ht
theorem nonempty_of_not_subset (h : ¬s ⊆ t) : (s \ t).Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, xs, xt⟩ := not_subset.1 h
⟨x, xs, xt⟩
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset (ht : s ⊂ t) : (t \ s).Nonempty :=
nonempty_of_not_subset ht.2
theorem Nonempty.of_diff (h : (s \ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem nonempty_of_ssubset' (ht : s ⊂ t) : t.Nonempty :=
(nonempty_of_ssubset ht).of_diff
theorem Nonempty.inl (hs : s.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
hs.imp fun _ => Or.inl
theorem Nonempty.inr (ht : t.Nonempty) : (s ∪ t).Nonempty :=
ht.imp fun _ => Or.inr
@[simp]
theorem union_nonempty : (s ∪ t).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty ∨ t.Nonempty :=
exists_or
theorem Nonempty.left (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : s.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.left
theorem Nonempty.right (h : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) : t.Nonempty :=
h.imp fun _ => And.right
theorem inter_nonempty : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x, x ∈ s ∧ x ∈ t :=
Iff.rfl
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_left : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, x ∈ t := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty]
theorem inter_nonempty_iff_exists_right : (s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ t, x ∈ s := by
simp_rw [inter_nonempty, and_comm]
theorem nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty : Nonempty α ↔ (univ : Set α).Nonempty :=
⟨fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩, fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem univ_nonempty : ∀ [Nonempty α], (univ : Set α).Nonempty
| ⟨x⟩ => ⟨x, trivial⟩
theorem Nonempty.to_subtype : s.Nonempty → Nonempty (↥s) :=
nonempty_subtype.2
theorem Nonempty.to_type : s.Nonempty → Nonempty α := fun ⟨x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩
instance univ.nonempty [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (↥(Set.univ : Set α)) :=
Set.univ_nonempty.to_subtype
-- Redeclare for refined keys
-- `Nonempty (@Subtype _ (@Membership.mem _ (Set _) _ (@Top.top (Set _) _)))`
instance instNonemptyTop [Nonempty α] : Nonempty (⊤ : Set α) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nonempty (univ : Set α))
theorem Nonempty.of_subtype [Nonempty (↥s)] : s.Nonempty := nonempty_subtype.mp ‹_›
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-23")] alias nonempty_of_nonempty_subtype := Nonempty.of_subtype
/-! ### Lemmas about the empty set -/
theorem empty_def : (∅ : Set α) = { _x : α | False } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_empty_iff_false (x : α) : x ∈ (∅ : Set α) ↔ False :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem setOf_false : { _a : α | False } = ∅ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_bot : { _x : α | ⊥ } = ∅ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem empty_subset (s : Set α) : ∅ ⊆ s :=
nofun
@[simp]
theorem subset_empty_iff {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ ↔ s = ∅ :=
(Subset.antisymm_iff.trans <| and_iff_left (empty_subset _)).symm
theorem eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem {s : Set α} : s = ∅ ↔ ∀ x, x ∉ s :=
subset_empty_iff.symm
theorem eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (h : ∀ x, x ∉ s) : s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 h
theorem eq_empty_of_subset_empty {s : Set α} : s ⊆ ∅ → s = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1
theorem eq_empty_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (s : Set α) : s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun x _ => isEmptyElim x
/-- There is exactly one set of a type that is empty. -/
instance uniqueEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Set α) where
default := ∅
uniq := eq_empty_of_isEmpty
/-- See also `Set.nonempty_iff_ne_empty`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty {s : Set α} : ¬s.Nonempty ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [Set.Nonempty, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty : s.Nonempty ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.not_right
/-- See also `nonempty_iff_ne_empty'`. -/
theorem not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty' : ¬Nonempty s ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [nonempty_subtype, not_exists, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
/-- See also `not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'`. -/
theorem nonempty_iff_ne_empty' : Nonempty s ↔ s ≠ ∅ :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty'.not_right
alias ⟨Nonempty.ne_empty, _⟩ := nonempty_iff_ne_empty
@[simp]
theorem not_nonempty_empty : ¬(∅ : Set α).Nonempty := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx
@[simp]
theorem isEmpty_coe_sort {s : Set α} : IsEmpty (↥s) ↔ s = ∅ :=
not_iff_not.1 <| by simpa using nonempty_iff_ne_empty
theorem eq_empty_or_nonempty (s : Set α) : s = ∅ ∨ s.Nonempty :=
or_iff_not_imp_left.2 nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2
theorem subset_eq_empty {s t : Set α} (h : t ⊆ s) (e : s = ∅) : t = ∅ :=
subset_empty_iff.1 <| e ▸ h
theorem forall_mem_empty {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), p x) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ => False.elim
instance (α : Type u) : IsEmpty.{u + 1} (↥(∅ : Set α)) :=
⟨fun x => x.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem empty_ssubset : ∅ ⊂ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
(@bot_lt_iff_ne_bot (Set α) _ _ _).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, Nonempty.empty_ssubset⟩ := empty_ssubset
/-!
### Universal set.
In Lean `@univ α` (or `univ : Set α`) is the set that contains all elements of type `α`.
Mathematically it is the same as `α` but it has a different type.
-/
@[simp]
theorem setOf_true : { _x : α | True } = univ :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem setOf_top : { _x : α | ⊤ } = univ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem univ_eq_empty_iff : (univ : Set α) = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty α :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.trans
⟨fun H => ⟨fun x => H x trivial⟩, fun H x _ => @IsEmpty.false α H x⟩
theorem empty_ne_univ [Nonempty α] : (∅ : Set α) ≠ univ := fun e =>
not_isEmpty_of_nonempty α <| univ_eq_empty_iff.1 e.symm
@[simp]
theorem subset_univ (s : Set α) : s ⊆ univ := fun _ _ => trivial
@[simp]
theorem univ_subset_iff {s : Set α} : univ ⊆ s ↔ s = univ :=
@top_le_iff _ _ _ s
alias ⟨eq_univ_of_univ_subset, _⟩ := univ_subset_iff
theorem eq_univ_iff_forall {s : Set α} : s = univ ↔ ∀ x, x ∈ s :=
univ_subset_iff.symm.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => imp_iff_right trivial
theorem eq_univ_of_forall {s : Set α} : (∀ x, x ∈ s) → s = univ :=
eq_univ_iff_forall.2
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Basic.lean | 575 | 576 | theorem Nonempty.eq_univ [Subsingleton α] : s.Nonempty → s = univ := by | rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Alex Kontorovich, David Loeffler, Heather Macbeth, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.CPolynomial
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.IntegrationByParts
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
/-!
# Derivatives of the Fourier transform
In this file we compute the Fréchet derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`, where `f` is a
function such that both `f` and `v ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖` are integrable. Here the Fourier transform is
understood as an operator `(V → E) → (W → E)`, where `V` and `W` are normed `ℝ`-vector spaces
and the Fourier transform is taken with respect to a continuous `ℝ`-bilinear
pairing `L : V × W → ℝ` and a given reference measure `μ`.
We also investigate higher derivatives: Assuming that `‖v‖^n * ‖f v‖` is integrable, we show
that the Fourier transform of `f` is `C^n`.
We also study in a parallel way the Fourier transform of the derivative, which is obtained by
tensoring the Fourier transform of the original function with the bilinear form. We also get
results for iterated derivatives.
A consequence of these results is that, if a function is smooth and all its derivatives are
integrable when multiplied by `‖v‖^k`, then the same goes for its Fourier transform, with
explicit bounds.
We give specialized versions of these results on inner product spaces (where `L` is the scalar
product) and on the real line, where we express the one-dimensional derivative in more concrete
terms, as the Fourier transform of `-2πI x * f x` (or `(-2πI x)^n * f x` for higher derivatives).
## Main definitions and results
We introduce two convenience definitions:
* `VectorFourier.fourierSMulRight L f`: given `f : V → E` and `L` a bilinear pairing
between `V` and `W`, then this is the function `fun v ↦ -(2 * π * I) (L v ⬝) • f v`,
from `V` to `Hom (W, E)`.
This is essentially `ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight`, up to the factor `- 2πI` designed to make
sure that the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier
integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierPowSMulRight` is the higher order analogue for higher derivatives:
`fourierPowSMulRight L f v n` is informally `(-(2 * π * I))^n (L v ⬝)^n • f v`, in
the space of continuous multilinear maps `W [×n]→L[ℝ] E`.
With these definitions, the statements read as follows, first in a general context
(arbitrary `L` and `μ`):
* `VectorFourier.hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable, with
derivative the Fourier integral of `fourierSMulRight L f`.
* `VectorFourier.differentiable_fourierIntegral`: the Fourier integral of `f` is differentiable.
* `VectorFourier.fderiv_fourierIntegral`: formula for the derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.fourierIntegral_fderiv`: formula for the Fourier integral of the derivative of `f`.
* `VectorFourier.hasFTaylorSeriesUpTo_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` has an explicit Taylor series up to order `N`, given by the Fourier
integrals of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.contDiff_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
the Fourier integral of `f` is `C^n`.
* `VectorFourier.iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral`: under suitable integrability conditions,
explicit formula for the `n`-th derivative of the Fourier integral of `f`, as the Fourier
integral of `fun v ↦ fourierPowSMulRight L f v n`.
* `VectorFourier.pow_mul_norm_iteratedFDeriv_fourierIntegral_le`: explicit bounds for the `n`-th
derivative of the Fourier integral, multiplied by a power function, in terms of corresponding
integrals for the original function.
These statements are then specialized to the case of the usual Fourier transform on
finite-dimensional inner product spaces with their canonical Lebesgue measure (covering in
particular the case of the real line), replacing the namespace `VectorFourier` by
the namespace `Real` in the above statements.
We also give specialized versions of the one-dimensional real derivative (and iterated derivative)
in `Real.deriv_fourierIntegral` and `Real.iteratedDeriv_fourierIntegral`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real Complex MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace
open scoped FourierTransform Topology ContDiff
-- without this local instance, Lean tries first the instance
-- `secondCountableTopologyEither_of_right` (whose priority is 100) and takes a very long time to
-- fail. Since we only use the left instance in this file, we make sure it is tried first.
attribute [local instance 101] secondCountableTopologyEither_of_left
namespace Real
lemma hasDerivAt_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : HasDerivAt (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) (2 * π * I * 𝐞 x) x := by
have h1 (y : ℝ) : 𝐞 y = fourier 1 (y : UnitAddCircle) := by
rw [fourierChar_apply, fourier_coe_apply]
push_cast
ring_nf
simpa only [h1, Int.cast_one, ofReal_one, div_one, mul_one] using hasDerivAt_fourier 1 1 x
lemma differentiable_fourierChar : Differentiable ℝ (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) :=
fun x ↦ (Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).differentiableAt
lemma deriv_fourierChar (x : ℝ) : deriv (𝐞 · : ℝ → ℂ) x = 2 * π * I * 𝐞 x :=
(Real.hasDerivAt_fourierChar x).deriv
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ)
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L v))) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert (hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg using 1
ext y
simp only [neg_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_neg,
ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, real_smul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right_apply (v : V) (w y : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) w y = -2 * π * I * L v y * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right (v : V) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun w ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun w ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L v w).differentiableAt
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ))
((-2 * π * I * 𝐞 (-L v w)) • (ofRealCLM ∘L (L.flip w))) v :=
hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_right L.flip w v
lemma fderiv_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left_apply (v y : V) (w : W) :
fderiv ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) v y = -2 * π * I * L y w * 𝐞 (-L v w) := by
simp only [(hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).fderiv, neg_mul,
ContinuousLinearMap.coe_smul', ContinuousLinearMap.coe_comp', Pi.smul_apply,
Function.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.flip_apply, ofRealCLM_apply, smul_eq_mul, neg_inj]
ring
lemma differentiable_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left (w : W) :
Differentiable ℝ (fun v ↦ (𝐞 (-L v w) : ℂ)) :=
fun v ↦ (hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_neg_bilinear_left L v w).differentiableAt
end Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E]
namespace VectorFourier
variable {V W : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedSpace ℝ V]
[NormedAddCommGroup W] [NormedSpace ℝ W] (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E)
/-- Send a function `f : V → E` to the function `f : V → Hom (W, E)` given by
`v ↦ (w ↦ -2 * π * I * L (v, w) • f v)`. This is designed so that the Fourier transform of
`fourierSMulRight L f` is the derivative of the Fourier transform of `f`. -/
def fourierSMulRight (v : V) : (W →L[ℝ] E) := -(2 * π * I) • (L v).smulRight (f v)
@[simp] lemma fourierSMulRight_apply (v : V) (w : W) :
fourierSMulRight L f v w = -(2 * π * I) • L v w • f v := rfl
/-- The `w`-derivative of the Fourier transform integrand. -/
lemma hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul (v : V) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fun w' ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v) (𝐞 (-L v w) • fourierSMulRight L f v) w := by
have ha : HasFDerivAt (fun w' : W ↦ L v w') (L v) w := ContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAt (L v)
convert ((hasDerivAt_fourierChar (-L v w)).hasFDerivAt.comp w ha.neg).smul_const (f v)
ext w' : 1
simp_rw [fourierSMulRight, ContinuousLinearMap.smul_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply]
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.neg_apply,
ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight_apply, ContinuousLinearMap.one_apply, ← smul_assoc, smul_comm,
← smul_assoc, real_smul, real_smul, Submonoid.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
push_cast
ring_nf
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by
rw [fourierSMulRight, norm_smul _ (ContinuousLinearMap.smulRight (L v) (f v)),
norm_neg, norm_mul, norm_mul, norm_I, mul_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg pi_pos.le,
Complex.norm_two, ContinuousLinearMap.norm_smulRight_apply, ← mul_assoc]
lemma norm_fourierSMulRight_le (L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ) (f : V → E) (v : V) :
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ ≤ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := calc
‖fourierSMulRight L f v‖ = (2 * π) * ‖L v‖ * ‖f v‖ := norm_fourierSMulRight _ _ _
_ ≤ (2 * π) * (‖L‖ * ‖v‖) * ‖f v‖ := by gcongr; exact L.le_opNorm _
_ = 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖ := by ring
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.fourierSMulRight
[SecondCountableTopologyEither V (W →L[ℝ] ℝ)] [MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V]
{L : V →L[ℝ] W →L[ℝ] ℝ} {f : V → E} {μ : Measure V}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ fourierSMulRight L f v) μ := by
apply AEStronglyMeasurable.const_smul'
have aux0 : Continuous fun p : (W →L[ℝ] ℝ) × E ↦ p.1.smulRight p.2 :=
(ContinuousLinearMap.smulRightL ℝ W E).continuous₂
have aux1 : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun v ↦ (L v, f v)) μ :=
L.continuous.aestronglyMeasurable.prodMk hf
-- Elaboration without the expected type is faster here:
exact (aux0.comp_aestronglyMeasurable aux1 :)
variable {f}
/-- Main theorem of this section: if both `f` and `x ↦ ‖x‖ * ‖f x‖` are integrable, then the
Fourier transform of `f` has a Fréchet derivative (everywhere in its domain) and its derivative is
the Fourier transform of `smulRight L f`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransformDeriv.lean | 209 | 233 | theorem hasFDerivAt_fourierIntegral
[MeasurableSpace V] [BorelSpace V] [SecondCountableTopology V] {μ : Measure V}
(hf : Integrable f μ) (hf' : Integrable (fun v : V ↦ ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖) μ) (w : W) :
HasFDerivAt (fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ f)
(fourierIntegral 𝐞 μ L.toLinearMap₂ (fourierSMulRight L f) w) w := by | let F : W → V → E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • f v
let F' : W → V → W →L[ℝ] E := fun w' v ↦ 𝐞 (-L v w') • fourierSMulRight L f v
let B : V → ℝ := fun v ↦ 2 * π * ‖L‖ * ‖v‖ * ‖f v‖
have h0 (w' : W) : Integrable (F w') μ :=
(fourierIntegral_convergent_iff continuous_fourierChar
(by apply L.continuous₂ : Continuous (fun p : V × W ↦ L.toLinearMap₂ p.1 p.2)) w').2 hf
have h1 : ∀ᶠ w' in 𝓝 w, AEStronglyMeasurable (F w') μ :=
Eventually.of_forall (fun w' ↦ (h0 w').aestronglyMeasurable)
have h3 : AEStronglyMeasurable (F' w) μ := by
refine .smul ?_ hf.1.fourierSMulRight
refine (continuous_fourierChar.comp ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
fun_prop
have h4 : (∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ (w' : W), w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → ‖F' w' v‖ ≤ B v) := by
filter_upwards with v w' _
rw [Circle.norm_smul _ (fourierSMulRight L f v)]
exact norm_fourierSMulRight_le L f v
have h5 : Integrable B μ := by simpa only [← mul_assoc] using hf'.const_mul (2 * π * ‖L‖)
have h6 : ∀ᵐ v ∂μ, ∀ w', w' ∈ Metric.ball w 1 → HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ F x v) (F' w' v) w' :=
ae_of_all _ (fun v w' _ ↦ hasFDerivAt_fourierChar_smul L f v w')
exact hasFDerivAt_integral_of_dominated_of_fderiv_le one_pos h1 (h0 w) h3 h4 h5 h6 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 148 | 163 | theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by | ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.IsometricSMul
/-!
# Hausdorff distance
The Hausdorff distance on subsets of a metric (or emetric) space.
Given two subsets `s` and `t` of a metric space, their Hausdorff distance is the smallest `d`
such that any point `s` is within `d` of a point in `t`, and conversely. This quantity
is often infinite (think of `s` bounded and `t` unbounded), and therefore better
expressed in the setting of emetric spaces.
## Main definitions
This files introduces:
* `EMetric.infEdist x s`, the infimum edistance of a point `x` to a set `s` in an emetric space
* `EMetric.hausdorffEdist s t`, the Hausdorff edistance of two sets in an emetric space
* Versions of these notions on metric spaces, called respectively `Metric.infDist`
and `Metric.hausdorffDist`
## Main results
* `infEdist_closure`: the edistance to a set and its closure coincide
* `EMetric.mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero`: a point `x` belongs to the closure of `s` iff
`infEdist x s = 0`
* `IsCompact.exists_infEdist_eq_edist`: if `s` is compact and non-empty, there exists a point `y`
which attains this edistance
* `IsOpen.exists_iUnion_isClosed`: every open set `U` can be written as the increasing union
of countably many closed subsets of `U`
* `hausdorffEdist_closure`: replacing a set by its closure does not change the Hausdorff edistance
* `hausdorffEdist_zero_iff_closure_eq_closure`: two sets have Hausdorff edistance zero
iff their closures coincide
* the Hausdorff edistance is symmetric and satisfies the triangle inequality
* in particular, closed sets in an emetric space are an emetric space
(this is shown in `EMetricSpace.closeds.emetricspace`)
* versions of these notions on metric spaces
* `hausdorffEdist_ne_top_of_nonempty_of_bounded`: if two sets in a metric space
are nonempty and bounded in a metric space, they are at finite Hausdorff edistance.
## Tags
metric space, Hausdorff distance
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Pointwise Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace EMetric
section InfEdist
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {x y : α} {s t : Set α} {Φ : α → β}
/-! ### Distance of a point to a set as a function into `ℝ≥0∞`. -/
/-- The minimal edistance of a point to a set -/
def infEdist (x : α) (s : Set α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ y ∈ s, edist x y
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_empty : infEdist x ∅ = ∞ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem le_infEdist {d} : d ≤ infEdist x s ↔ ∀ y ∈ s, d ≤ edist x y := by
simp only [infEdist, le_iInf_iff]
/-- The edist to a union is the minimum of the edists -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_union : infEdist x (s ∪ t) = infEdist x s ⊓ infEdist x t :=
iInf_union
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_iUnion (f : ι → Set α) (x : α) : infEdist x (⋃ i, f i) = ⨅ i, infEdist x (f i) :=
iInf_iUnion f _
lemma infEdist_biUnion {ι : Type*} (f : ι → Set α) (I : Set ι) (x : α) :
infEdist x (⋃ i ∈ I, f i) = ⨅ i ∈ I, infEdist x (f i) := by simp only [infEdist_iUnion]
/-- The edist to a singleton is the edistance to the single point of this singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem infEdist_singleton : infEdist x {y} = edist x y :=
iInf_singleton
/-- The edist to a set is bounded above by the edist to any of its points -/
theorem infEdist_le_edist_of_mem (h : y ∈ s) : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y :=
iInf₂_le y h
/-- If a point `x` belongs to `s`, then its edist to `s` vanishes -/
theorem infEdist_zero_of_mem (h : x ∈ s) : infEdist x s = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| @edist_self _ _ x ▸ infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h
/-- The edist is antitone with respect to inclusion. -/
theorem infEdist_anti (h : s ⊆ t) : infEdist x t ≤ infEdist x s :=
iInf_le_iInf_of_subset h
/-- The edist to a set is `< r` iff there exists a point in the set at edistance `< r` -/
theorem infEdist_lt_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} : infEdist x s < r ↔ ∃ y ∈ s, edist x y < r := by
simp_rw [infEdist, iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop]
/-- The edist of `x` to `s` is bounded by the sum of the edist of `y` to `s` and
the edist from `x` to `y` -/
theorem infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist : infEdist x s ≤ infEdist y s + edist x y :=
calc
⨅ z ∈ s, edist x z ≤ ⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z + edist x y :=
iInf₂_mono fun _ _ => (edist_triangle _ _ _).trans_eq (add_comm _ _)
_ = (⨅ z ∈ s, edist y z) + edist x y := by simp only [ENNReal.iInf_add]
theorem infEdist_le_edist_add_infEdist : infEdist x s ≤ edist x y + infEdist y s := by
rw [add_comm]
exact infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist
theorem edist_le_infEdist_add_ediam (hy : y ∈ s) : edist x y ≤ infEdist x s + diam s := by
simp_rw [infEdist, ENNReal.iInf_add]
refine le_iInf₂ fun i hi => ?_
calc
edist x y ≤ edist x i + edist i y := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ edist x i + diam s := add_le_add le_rfl (edist_le_diam_of_mem hi hy)
/-- The edist to a set depends continuously on the point -/
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_infEdist : Continuous fun x => infEdist x s :=
continuous_of_le_add_edist 1 (by simp) <| by
simp only [one_mul, infEdist_le_infEdist_add_edist, forall₂_true_iff]
/-- The edist to a set and to its closure coincide -/
theorem infEdist_closure : infEdist x (closure s) = infEdist x s := by
refine le_antisymm (infEdist_anti subset_closure) ?_
refine ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_
have ε0 : 0 < (ε / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [pos_iff_ne_zero] using εpos
have : infEdist x (closure s) < infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right h.ne ε0.ne'
obtain ⟨y : α, ycs : y ∈ closure s, hy : edist x y < infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε / 2⟩ :=
infEdist_lt_iff.mp this
obtain ⟨z : α, zs : z ∈ s, dyz : edist y z < ↑ε / 2⟩ := EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 ycs (ε / 2) ε0
calc
infEdist x s ≤ edist x z := infEdist_le_edist_of_mem zs
_ ≤ edist x y + edist y z := edist_triangle _ _ _
_ ≤ infEdist x (closure s) + ε / 2 + ε / 2 := add_le_add (le_of_lt hy) (le_of_lt dyz)
_ = infEdist x (closure s) + ↑ε := by rw [add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
/-- A point belongs to the closure of `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/HausdorffDistance.lean | 154 | 167 | theorem mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero : x ∈ closure s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rw [← infEdist_closure]
exact infEdist_zero_of_mem h,
fun h =>
EMetric.mem_closure_iff.2 fun ε εpos => infEdist_lt_iff.mp <| by rwa [h]⟩
/-- Given a closed set `s`, a point belongs to `s` iff its infimum edistance to this set vanishes -/
theorem mem_iff_infEdist_zero_of_closed (h : IsClosed s) : x ∈ s ↔ infEdist x s = 0 := by | rw [← mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, h.closure_eq]
/-- The infimum edistance of a point to a set is positive if and only if the point is not in the
closure of the set. -/
theorem infEdist_pos_iff_not_mem_closure {x : α} {E : Set α} : |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.GCDMonoid
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Multiplicity
/-!
# Squarefree elements of monoids
An element of a monoid is squarefree when it is not divisible by any squares
except the squares of units.
Results about squarefree natural numbers are proved in `Data.Nat.Squarefree`.
## Main Definitions
- `Squarefree r` indicates that `r` is only divisible by `x * x` if `x` is a unit.
## Main Results
- `multiplicity.squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one`: `x` is `Squarefree` iff for every `y`, either
`emultiplicity y x ≤ 1` or `IsUnit y`.
- `UniqueFactorizationMonoid.squarefree_iff_nodup_factors`: A nonzero element `x` of a unique
factorization monoid is squarefree iff `factors x` has no duplicate factors.
## Tags
squarefree, multiplicity
-/
variable {R : Type*}
/-- An element of a monoid is squarefree if the only squares that
divide it are the squares of units. -/
def Squarefree [Monoid R] (r : R) : Prop :=
∀ x : R, x * x ∣ r → IsUnit x
theorem IsRelPrime.of_squarefree_mul [CommMonoid R] {m n : R} (h : Squarefree (m * n)) :
IsRelPrime m n := fun c hca hcb ↦ h c (mul_dvd_mul hca hcb)
@[simp]
theorem IsUnit.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : IsUnit x) : Squarefree x := fun _ hdvd =>
isUnit_of_mul_isUnit_left (isUnit_of_dvd_unit hdvd h)
theorem squarefree_one [CommMonoid R] : Squarefree (1 : R) :=
isUnit_one.squarefree
@[simp]
theorem not_squarefree_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] : ¬Squarefree (0 : R) := by
erw [not_forall]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
theorem Squarefree.ne_zero [MonoidWithZero R] [Nontrivial R] {m : R} (hm : Squarefree (m : R)) :
m ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
exact not_squarefree_zero hm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Squarefree/Basic.lean | 60 | 63 | theorem Irreducible.squarefree [CommMonoid R] {x : R} (h : Irreducible x) : Squarefree x := by | rintro y ⟨z, hz⟩
rw [mul_assoc] at hz
rcases h.isUnit_or_isUnit hz with (hu | hu) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Bilinear
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Opposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pointwise.Set.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Submodule.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Submonoid.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Semiring
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.SubMulAction.Pointwise
/-!
# Multiplication and division of submodules of an algebra.
An interface for multiplication and division of sub-R-modules of an R-algebra A is developed.
## Main definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or semiring) and let `A` be an `R`-algebra.
* `1 : Submodule R A` : the R-submodule R of the R-algebra A
* `Mul (Submodule R A)` : multiplication of two sub-R-modules M and N of A is defined to be
the smallest submodule containing all the products `m * n`.
* `Div (Submodule R A)` : `I / J` is defined to be the submodule consisting of all `a : A` such
that `a • J ⊆ I`
It is proved that `Submodule R A` is a semiring, and also an algebra over `Set A`.
Additionally, in the `Pointwise` locale we promote `Submodule.pointwiseDistribMulAction` to a
`MulSemiringAction` as `Submodule.pointwiseMulSemiringAction`.
When `R` is not necessarily commutative, and `A` is merely a `R`-module with a ring structure
such that `IsScalarTower R A A` holds (equivalent to the data of a ring homomorphism `R →+* A`
by `ringHomEquivModuleIsScalarTower`), we can still define `1 : Submodule R A` and
`Mul (Submodule R A)`, but `1` is only a left identity, not necessarily a right one.
## Tags
multiplication of submodules, division of submodules, submodule semiring
-/
universe uι u v
open Algebra Set MulOpposite
open Pointwise
namespace SubMulAction
variable {R : Type u} {A : Type v} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) :=
⟨r, (algebraMap_eq_smul_one r).symm⟩
theorem mem_one' {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : SubMulAction R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x :=
exists_congr fun r => by rw [algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
end SubMulAction
namespace Submodule
section Module
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Module R A]
-- TODO: Why is this in a file about `Algebra`?
-- TODO: potentially change this back to `LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A)`
-- once a version of `Algebra` without the `commutes'` field is introduced.
-- See issue https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/18110.
/-- `1 : Submodule R A` is the submodule `R ∙ 1` of `A`.
-/
instance one : One (Submodule R A) :=
⟨LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R A 1)⟩
theorem one_eq_span : (1 : Submodule R A) = R ∙ 1 :=
(LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range _ _ _).symm
theorem le_one_toAddSubmonoid : 1 ≤ (1 : Submodule R A).toAddSubmonoid := by
rintro x ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, show (n : R) • (1 : A) = n by rw [Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul, nsmul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem toSubMulAction_one : (1 : Submodule R A).toSubMulAction = 1 :=
SetLike.ext fun _ ↦ by rw [one_eq_span, SubMulAction.mem_one]; exact mem_span_singleton
theorem one_eq_span_one_set : (1 : Submodule R A) = span R 1 :=
one_eq_span
@[simp]
theorem one_le {P : Submodule R A} : (1 : Submodule R A) ≤ P ↔ (1 : A) ∈ P := by
simp [one_eq_span]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [Module A M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
instance : SMul (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) where
smul A' M' :=
{ __ := A'.toAddSubmonoid • M'.toAddSubmonoid
smul_mem' := fun r m hm ↦ AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on hm
(fun a ha m hm ↦ by rw [← smul_assoc]; exact AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul (A'.smul_mem r ha) hm)
fun m₁ m₂ h₁ h₂ ↦ by rw [smul_add]; exact (A'.1 • M'.1).add_mem h₁ h₂ }
section
variable {I J : Submodule R A} {N P : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_toAddSubmonoid : (I • N).toAddSubmonoid = I.toAddSubmonoid • N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
theorem smul_mem_smul {r} {n} (hr : r ∈ I) (hn : n ∈ N) : r • n ∈ I • N :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_mem_smul hr hn
theorem smul_le : I • N ≤ P ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, r • n ∈ P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_set_smul : (I : Set A) • N = I • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(fun _ _ hr hx ↦ smul_mem_smul hr hx)
(smul_le.mpr fun _ hr _ hx ↦ mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem hr hx)
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on {p : M → Prop} {x} (H : x ∈ I • N) (smul : ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ n ∈ N, p (r • n))
(add : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x + y)) : p x :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_induction_on H smul add
/-- Dependent version of `Submodule.smul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem smul_induction_on' {x : M} (hx : x ∈ I • N) {p : ∀ x, x ∈ I • N → Prop}
(smul : ∀ (r : A) (hr : r ∈ I) (n : M) (hn : n ∈ N), p (r • n) (smul_mem_smul hr hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, p x hx → p y hy → p (x + y) (add_mem ‹_› ‹_›)) : p x hx := by
refine Exists.elim ?_ fun (h : x ∈ I • N) (H : p x h) ↦ H
exact smul_induction_on hx (fun a ha x hx ↦ ⟨_, smul _ ha _ hx⟩)
fun x y ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ ↦ ⟨_, add _ _ _ _ hx hy⟩
theorem smul_mono (hij : I ≤ J) (hnp : N ≤ P) : I • N ≤ J • P :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_le_smul hij hnp
theorem smul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I • N ≤ J • N :=
smul_mono h le_rfl
instance : CovariantClass (Submodule R A) (Submodule R M) HSMul.hSMul LE.le :=
⟨fun _ _ => smul_mono le_rfl⟩
variable (I J N P)
@[simp]
theorem smul_bot : I • (⊥ : Submodule R M) = ⊥ :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_smul : (⊥ : Submodule R A) • N = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.mp <| smul_le.mpr <| by rintro _ rfl _ _; rw [zero_smul]; exact zero_mem _
theorem smul_sup : I • (N ⊔ P) = I • N ⊔ I • P :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, sup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.addSubmonoid_smul_sup]
theorem sup_smul : (I ⊔ J) • N = I • N ⊔ J • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun mn hmn p hp ↦ by
obtain ⟨m, hm, n, hn, rfl⟩ := mem_sup.mp hmn
rw [add_smul]; exact add_mem_sup (smul_mem_smul hm hp) <| smul_mem_smul hn hp)
(sup_le (smul_mono_left le_sup_left) <| smul_mono_left le_sup_right)
protected theorem smul_assoc {B} [Semiring B] [Module R B] [Module A B] [Module B M]
[IsScalarTower R A B] [IsScalarTower R B M] [IsScalarTower A B M]
(I : Submodule R A) (J : Submodule R B) (N : Submodule R M) :
(I • J) • N = I • J • N :=
le_antisymm
(smul_le.2 fun _ hrsij t htn ↦ smul_induction_on hrsij
(fun r hr s hs ↦ smul_assoc r s t ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (smul_mem_smul hs htn))
fun x y ↦ (add_smul x y t).symm ▸ add_mem)
(smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hsn ↦ smul_induction_on hsn
(fun j hj n hn ↦ (smul_assoc r j n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul (smul_mem_smul hr hj) hn)
fun m₁ m₂ ↦ (smul_add r m₁ m₂) ▸ add_mem)
theorem smul_iSup {ι : Sort*} {I : Submodule R A} {t : ι → Submodule R M} :
I • (⨆ i, t i)= ⨆ i, I • t i :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| by
simp only [smul_toAddSubmonoid, iSup_toAddSubmonoid, AddSubmonoid.smul_iSup]
theorem iSup_smul {ι : Sort*} {t : ι → Submodule R A} {N : Submodule R M} :
(⨆ i, t i) • N = ⨆ i, t i • N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun t ht s hs ↦ iSup_induction _ (motive := (· • s ∈ _)) ht
(fun i t ht ↦ mem_iSup_of_mem i <| smul_mem_smul ht hs)
(by simp_rw [zero_smul]; apply zero_mem) fun x y ↦ by simp_rw [add_smul]; apply add_mem)
(iSup_le fun i ↦ Submodule.smul_mono_left <| le_iSup _ i)
protected theorem one_smul : (1 : Submodule R A) • N = N := by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun r hr m hm ↦ ?_) fun m hm ↦ ?_
· obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_apply, smul_one_smul]; exact N.smul_mem r hm
· rw [← one_smul A m]; exact smul_mem_smul (one_le.mp le_rfl) hm
theorem smul_subset_smul : (↑I : Set A) • (↑N : Set M) ⊆ (↑(I • N) : Set M) :=
AddSubmonoid.smul_subset_smul
end
variable [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- Multiplication of sub-R-modules of an R-module A that is also a semiring. The submodule `M * N`
consists of finite sums of elements `m * n` for `m ∈ M` and `n ∈ N`. -/
instance mul : Mul (Submodule R A) where
mul := (· • ·)
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem mul_mem_mul (hm : m ∈ M) (hn : n ∈ N) : m * n ∈ M * N :=
smul_mem_smul hm hn
theorem mul_le : M * N ≤ P ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, m * n ∈ P :=
smul_le
theorem mul_toAddSubmonoid (M N : Submodule R A) :
(M * N).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid * N.toAddSubmonoid := rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on {C : A → Prop} {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N)
(hm : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, C (m * n)) (ha : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C r :=
smul_induction_on hr hm ha
/-- A dependent version of `mul_induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem mul_induction_on' {C : ∀ r, r ∈ M * N → Prop}
(mem_mul_mem : ∀ m (hm : m ∈ M) n (hn : n ∈ N), C (m * n) (mul_mem_mul hm hn))
(add : ∀ x hx y hy, C x hx → C y hy → C (x + y) (add_mem hx hy)) {r : A} (hr : r ∈ M * N) :
C r hr :=
smul_induction_on' hr mem_mul_mem add
variable (M)
@[simp]
theorem mul_bot : M * ⊥ = ⊥ :=
smul_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * M = ⊥ :=
bot_smul _
protected theorem one_mul : (1 : Submodule R A) * M = M :=
Submodule.one_smul _
variable {M}
@[mono]
theorem mul_le_mul (hmp : M ≤ P) (hnq : N ≤ Q) : M * N ≤ P * Q :=
smul_mono hmp hnq
theorem mul_le_mul_left (h : M ≤ N) : M * P ≤ N * P :=
smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_le_mul_right (h : N ≤ P) : M * N ≤ M * P :=
smul_mono_right _ h
theorem mul_comm_of_commute (h : ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ n ∈ N, Commute m n) : M * N = N * M :=
toAddSubmonoid_injective <| AddSubmonoid.mul_comm_of_commute h
variable (M N P)
theorem mul_sup : M * (N ⊔ P) = M * N ⊔ M * P :=
smul_sup _ _ _
theorem sup_mul : (M ⊔ N) * P = M * P ⊔ N * P :=
sup_smul _ _ _
theorem mul_subset_mul : (↑M : Set A) * (↑N : Set A) ⊆ (↑(M * N) : Set A) :=
smul_subset_smul _ _
lemma restrictScalars_mul {A B C} [Semiring A] [Semiring B] [Semiring C]
[SMul A B] [Module A C] [Module B C] [IsScalarTower A C C] [IsScalarTower B C C]
[IsScalarTower A B C] {I J : Submodule B C} :
(I * J).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A * J.restrictScalars A :=
rfl
variable {ι : Sort uι}
theorem iSup_mul (s : ι → Submodule R A) (t : Submodule R A) : (⨆ i, s i) * t = ⨆ i, s i * t :=
iSup_smul
theorem mul_iSup (t : Submodule R A) (s : ι → Submodule R A) : (t * ⨆ i, s i) = ⨆ i, t * s i :=
smul_iSup
/-- Sub-`R`-modules of an `R`-module form an idempotent semiring. -/
instance : NonUnitalSemiring (Submodule R A) where
__ := toAddSubmonoid_injective.semigroup _ mul_toAddSubmonoid
zero_mul := bot_mul
mul_zero := mul_bot
left_distrib := mul_sup
right_distrib := sup_mul
instance : Pow (Submodule R A) ℕ where
pow s n := npowRec n s
theorem pow_eq_npowRec {n : ℕ} : M ^ n = npowRec n M := rfl
protected theorem pow_zero : M ^ 0 = 1 := rfl
protected theorem pow_succ {n : ℕ} : M ^ (n + 1) = M ^ n * M := rfl
protected theorem pow_add {m n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : M ^ (m + n) = M ^ m * M ^ n :=
npowRec_add m n h _ M.one_mul
protected theorem pow_one : M ^ 1 = M := by
rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.one_mul]
/-- `Submodule.pow_succ` with the right hand side commuted. -/
protected theorem pow_succ' {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : M ^ (n + 1) = M * M ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, M.pow_add h, Submodule.pow_one]
theorem pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) : (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid = M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n := by
induction n with
| zero => exact (h rfl).elim
| succ n ih =>
rw [Submodule.pow_succ, pow_succ, mul_toAddSubmonoid]
cases n with
| zero => rw [Submodule.pow_zero, pow_zero, one_mul, ← mul_toAddSubmonoid, Submodule.one_mul]
| succ n => rw [ih n.succ_ne_zero]
theorem le_pow_toAddSubmonoid {n : ℕ} : M.toAddSubmonoid ^ n ≤ (M ^ n).toAddSubmonoid := by
obtain rfl | hn := Decidable.eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, pow_zero]
exact le_one_toAddSubmonoid
· exact (pow_toAddSubmonoid M hn).ge
theorem pow_subset_pow {n : ℕ} : (↑M : Set A) ^ n ⊆ ↑(M ^ n : Submodule R A) :=
trans AddSubmonoid.pow_subset_pow (le_pow_toAddSubmonoid M)
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : A} (hx : x ∈ M) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ M ^ n :=
pow_subset_pow _ <| Set.pow_mem_pow hx
lemma restrictScalars_pow {A B C : Type*} [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
[Semiring C] [SMul A B] [Module A C] [Module B C]
[IsScalarTower A C C] [IsScalarTower B C C] [IsScalarTower A B C]
{I : Submodule B C} :
∀ {n : ℕ}, (hn : n ≠ 0) → (I ^ n).restrictScalars A = I.restrictScalars A ^ n
| 1, _ => by simp [Submodule.pow_one]
| n + 2, _ => by
simp [Submodule.pow_succ (n := n + 1), restrictScalars_mul, restrictScalars_pow n.succ_ne_zero]
end Module
variable {ι : Sort uι}
variable {R : Type u} [CommSemiring R]
section AlgebraSemiring
variable {A : Type v} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
variable (S T : Set A) {M N P Q : Submodule R A} {m n : A}
theorem one_eq_range : (1 : Submodule R A) = LinearMap.range (Algebra.linearMap R A) := by
rw [one_eq_span, LinearMap.span_singleton_eq_range,
LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_eq_algebra_linearMap]
theorem algebraMap_mem (r : R) : algebraMap R A r ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) := by
simp [one_eq_range]
@[simp]
theorem mem_one {x : A} : x ∈ (1 : Submodule R A) ↔ ∃ y, algebraMap R A y = x := by
simp [one_eq_range]
protected theorem map_one {A'} [Semiring A'] [Algebra R A'] (f : A →ₐ[R] A') :
map f.toLinearMap (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem map_op_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R A) = 1 := by
ext x
induction x
simp
@[simp]
theorem comap_op_one :
comap (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) : A →ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Operations.lean | 384 | 387 | theorem map_unop_one :
map (↑(opLinearEquiv R : A ≃ₗ[R] Aᵐᵒᵖ).symm : Aᵐᵒᵖ →ₗ[R] A) (1 : Submodule R Aᵐᵒᵖ) = 1 := by | rw [← comap_equiv_eq_map_symm, comap_op_one] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Uthaiwat, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Div
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Nilpotency in polynomial rings.
This file is a place for results related to nilpotency in (single-variable) polynomial rings.
## Main results:
* `Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff`
* `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`
-/
namespace Polynomial
variable {R : Type*} {r : R}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {P : R[X]}
lemma isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent ((C r) * X ^ n) := by
refine Commute.isNilpotent_mul_left (commute_X_pow _ _).symm ?_
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := hnil
refine ⟨m, ?_⟩
rw [← C_pow, hm, C_0]
lemma isNilpotent_pow_X_mul_C_of_isNilpotent (n : ℕ) (hnil : IsNilpotent r) :
IsNilpotent (X ^ n * (C r)) := by
rw [commute_X_pow]
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent n hnil
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_monomial_iff {n : ℕ} :
IsNilpotent (monomial (R := R) n r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simp
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_C_iff :
IsNilpotent (C r) ↔ IsNilpotent r :=
exists_congr fun k ↦ by simpa only [← C_pow] using C_eq_zero
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_X_mul_iff :
IsNilpotent (X * P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· rwa [Commute.isNilpotent_mul_right_iff (commute_X P) (by simp)] at h
· rintro ⟨k, hk⟩
exact ⟨k, by simp [(commute_X P).mul_pow, hk]⟩
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_mul_X_iff :
IsNilpotent (P * X) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
rw [← commute_X P]
exact isNilpotent_X_mul_iff
end Semiring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {P : R[X]}
protected lemma isNilpotent_iff :
IsNilpotent P ↔ ∀ i, IsNilpotent (coeff P i) := by
refine
⟨P.recOnHorner (by simp) (fun p r hp₀ _ hp hpr i ↦ ?_) (fun p _ hnp hpX i ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [← sum_monomial_eq P]
exact isNilpotent_sum (fun i _ ↦ by simpa only [isNilpotent_monomial_iff] using h i)
· have hr : IsNilpotent (C r) := by
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hpr
replace hp : eval 0 p = 0 := by rwa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero] at hp₀
refine isNilpotent_C_iff.mpr ⟨k, ?_⟩
simpa [coeff_zero_eq_aeval_zero, hp] using congr_arg (fun q ↦ coeff q 0) hk
rcases i with - | i
· simpa [hp₀] using hr
simp only [coeff_add, coeff_C_succ, add_zero]
apply hp
simpa using Commute.isNilpotent_sub (Commute.all _ _) hpr hr
· rcases i with - | i
· simp
simpa using hnp (isNilpotent_mul_X_iff.mp hpX) i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reflect_iff {P : R[X]} {N : ℕ} (hN : P.natDegree ≤ N) :
IsNilpotent (reflect N P) ↔ IsNilpotent P := by
simp only [Polynomial.isNilpotent_iff, coeff_reverse]
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ ?_, fun h i ↦ ?_⟩ <;> rcases le_or_lt i N with hi | hi
· simpa [tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hi] using h (N - i)
· simp [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt hN hi]
· simpa [hi, revAt_le] using h (N - i)
· simpa [revAt_eq_self_of_lt hi] using h i
@[simp] lemma isNilpotent_reverse_iff :
IsNilpotent P.reverse ↔ IsNilpotent P :=
isNilpotent_reflect_iff (le_refl _)
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If its constant term is a unit and its other coefficients are
nilpotent, then `P` is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
theorem isUnit_of_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent (hunit : IsUnit (P.coeff 0))
(hnil : ∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) : IsUnit P := by
induction' h : P.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with k hind generalizing P
by_cases hdeg : P.natDegree = 0
{ rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hdeg]
exact hunit.map C }
set P₁ := P.eraseLead with hP₁
suffices IsUnit P₁ by
rw [← eraseLead_add_monomial_natDegree_leadingCoeff P, ← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, ← hP₁]
refine IsNilpotent.isUnit_add_left_of_commute ?_ this (Commute.all _ _)
exact isNilpotent_C_mul_pow_X_of_isNilpotent _ (hnil _ hdeg)
have hdeg₂ := lt_of_le_of_lt P.eraseLead_natDegree_le (Nat.sub_lt
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hdeg) zero_lt_one)
refine hind P₁.natDegree ?_ ?_ (fun i hi => ?_) rfl
· simp_rw [P₁, ← h, hdeg₂]
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (Ne.symm hdeg), hunit]
· by_cases H : i ≤ P₁.natDegree
· simp_rw [P₁, eraseLead_coeff_of_ne _ (ne_of_lt (lt_of_le_of_lt H hdeg₂)), hnil i hi]
· simp_rw [coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt (lt_of_not_ge H), IsNilpotent.zero]
/-- Let `P` be a polynomial over `R`. If `P` is a unit, then all its coefficients are nilpotent,
except its constant term which is a unit.
See also `Polynomial.isUnit_iff_coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Nilpotent.lean | 132 | 150 | theorem coeff_isUnit_isNilpotent_of_isUnit (hunit : IsUnit P) :
IsUnit (P.coeff 0) ∧ (∀ i, i ≠ 0 → IsNilpotent (P.coeff i)) := by | obtain ⟨Q, hQ⟩ := IsUnit.exists_right_inv hunit
constructor
· refine isUnit_of_mul_eq_one _ (Q.coeff 0) ?_
have h := (mul_coeff_zero P Q).symm
rwa [hQ, coeff_one_zero] at h
· intros n hn
rw [nilpotent_iff_mem_prime]
intros I hI
let f := mapRingHom (Ideal.Quotient.mk I)
have hPQ : degree (f P) = 0 ∧ degree (f Q) = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.WithBot.add_eq_zero_iff, ← degree_mul, ← map_mul, hQ, map_one, degree_one]
have hcoeff : (f P).coeff n = 0 := by
refine coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt ?_
rw [hPQ.1]
exact WithBot.coe_pos.2 hn.bot_lt
rw [coe_mapRingHom, coeff_map, ← RingHom.mem_ker, Ideal.mk_ker] at hcoeff
exact hcoeff |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.IdentDistrib
import Mathlib.Probability.Independence.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.DominatedConvergence
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.FloorPow
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.SpecificAsymptotics
/-!
# The strong law of large numbers
We prove the strong law of large numbers, in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae`:
If `X n` is a sequence of independent identically distributed integrable random
variables, then `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges almost surely to `𝔼[X 0]`.
We give here the strong version, due to Etemadi, that only requires pairwise independence.
This file also contains the Lᵖ version of the strong law of large numbers provided by
`ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_Lp` which shows `∑ i ∈ range n, X i / n` converges in Lᵖ to
`𝔼[X 0]` provided `X n` is independent identically distributed and is Lᵖ.
## Implementation
The main point is to prove the result for real-valued random variables, as the general case
of Banach-space valued random variables follows from this case and approximation by simple
functions. The real version is given in `ProbabilityTheory.strong_law_ae_real`.
We follow the proof by Etemadi
[Etemadi, *An elementary proof of the strong law of large numbers*][etemadi_strong_law],
which goes as follows.
It suffices to prove the result for nonnegative `X`, as one can prove the general result by
splitting a general `X` into its positive part and negative part.
Consider `Xₙ` a sequence of nonnegative integrable identically distributed pairwise independent
random variables. Let `Yₙ` be the truncation of `Xₙ` up to `n`. We claim that
* Almost surely, `Xₙ = Yₙ` for all but finitely many indices. Indeed, `∑ ℙ (Xₙ ≠ Yₙ)` is bounded by
`1 + 𝔼[X]` (see `sum_prob_mem_Ioc_le` and `tsum_prob_mem_Ioi_lt_top`).
* Let `c > 1`. Along the sequence `n = c ^ k`, then `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ])/n` converges almost
surely to `0`. This follows from a variance control, as
```
∑_k ℙ (|∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Yᵢ - 𝔼[Yᵢ]| > c^k ε)
≤ ∑_k (c^k ε)^{-2} ∑_{i=0}^{c^k - 1} Var[Yᵢ] (by Markov inequality)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) Var[Yᵢ] (as ∑_{c^k > i} 1/(c^k)^2 ≤ C/i^2)
≤ ∑_i (C/i^2) 𝔼[Yᵢ^2]
≤ 2C 𝔼[X^2] (see `sum_variance_truncation_le`)
```
* As `𝔼[Yᵢ]` converges to `𝔼[X]`, it follows from the two previous items and Cesàro that, along
the sequence `n = c^k`, one has `(∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ) / n → 𝔼[X]` almost surely.
* To generalize it to all indices, we use the fact that `∑_{i=0}^{n-1} Xᵢ` is nondecreasing and
that, if `c` is close enough to `1`, the gap between `c^k` and `c^(k+1)` is small.
-/
noncomputable section
open MeasureTheory Filter Finset Asymptotics
open Set (indicator)
open scoped Topology MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
namespace ProbabilityTheory
/-! ### Prerequisites on truncations -/
section Truncation
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Truncating a real-valued function to the interval `(-A, A]`. -/
def truncation (f : α → ℝ) (A : ℝ) :=
indicator (Set.Ioc (-A) A) id ∘ f
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → ℝ}
| Mathlib/Probability/StrongLaw.lean | 82 | 85 | theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.truncation (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{A : ℝ} : AEStronglyMeasurable (truncation f A) μ := by | apply AEStronglyMeasurable.comp_aemeasurable _ hf.aemeasurable
exact (stronglyMeasurable_id.indicator measurableSet_Ioc).aestronglyMeasurable |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Associated
import Mathlib.Algebra.Star.Unitary
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PrincipalIdealDomain
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Int
/-! # ℤ[√d]
The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d : ℤ`.
After defining the norm, we show that it is a linearly ordered commutative ring,
as well as an integral domain.
We provide the universal property, that ring homomorphisms `ℤ√d →+* R` correspond
to choices of square roots of `d` in `R`.
-/
/-- The ring of integers adjoined with a square root of `d`.
These have the form `a + b √d` where `a b : ℤ`. The components
are called `re` and `im` by analogy to the negative `d` case. -/
@[ext]
structure Zsqrtd (d : ℤ) where
/-- Component of the integer not multiplied by `√d` -/
re : ℤ
/-- Component of the integer multiplied by `√d` -/
im : ℤ
deriving DecidableEq
@[inherit_doc] prefix:100 "ℤ√" => Zsqrtd
namespace Zsqrtd
section
variable {d : ℤ}
/-- Convert an integer to a `ℤ√d` -/
def ofInt (n : ℤ) : ℤ√d :=
⟨n, 0⟩
theorem ofInt_re (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
theorem ofInt_im (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The zero of the ring -/
instance : Zero (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_re : (0 : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_im : (0 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (ℤ√d) :=
⟨0⟩
/-- The one of the ring -/
instance : One (ℤ√d) :=
⟨ofInt 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem one_re : (1 : ℤ√d).re = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem one_im : (1 : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
/-- The representative of `√d` in the ring -/
def sqrtd : ℤ√d :=
⟨0, 1⟩
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_re : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).re = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sqrtd_im : (sqrtd : ℤ√d).im = 1 :=
rfl
/-- Addition of elements of `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Add (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 + w.1, z.2 + w.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_def (x y x' y' : ℤ) : (⟨x, y⟩ + ⟨x', y'⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x + x', y + y'⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).re = z.re + w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z + w).im = z.im + w.im :=
rfl
/-- Negation in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Neg (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z => ⟨-z.1, -z.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_re (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).re = -z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_im (z : ℤ√d) : (-z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
/-- Multiplication in `ℤ√d` -/
instance : Mul (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun z w => ⟨z.1 * w.1 + d * z.2 * w.2, z.1 * w.2 + z.2 * w.1⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).re = z.re * w.re + d * z.im * w.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z * w).im = z.re * w.im + z.im * w.re :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ add := (· + ·)
zero := (0 : ℤ√d)
sub := fun a b => a + -b
neg := Neg.neg
nsmul := @nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨Neg.neg⟩ (@nsmulRec (ℤ√d) ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_assoc := ?_
zero_add := ?_
add_zero := ?_
neg_add_cancel := ?_
add_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp [add_comm, add_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem sub_re (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).re = z.re - w.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_im (z w : ℤ√d) : (z - w).im = z.im - w.im :=
rfl
instance addGroupWithOne : AddGroupWithOne (ℤ√d) :=
{ Zsqrtd.addCommGroup with
natCast := fun n => ofInt n
intCast := ofInt
one := 1 }
instance commRing : CommRing (ℤ√d) := by
refine
{ Zsqrtd.addGroupWithOne with
mul := (· * ·)
npow := @npowRec (ℤ√d) ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩,
add_comm := ?_
left_distrib := ?_
right_distrib := ?_
zero_mul := ?_
mul_zero := ?_
mul_assoc := ?_
one_mul := ?_
mul_one := ?_
mul_comm := ?_ } <;>
intros <;>
ext <;>
simp <;>
ring
instance : AddMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Semiring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Ring (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
instance : Distrib (ℤ√d) := by infer_instance
/-- Conjugation in `ℤ√d`. The conjugate of `a + b √d` is `a - b √d`. -/
instance : Star (ℤ√d) where
star z := ⟨z.1, -z.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem star_mk (x y : ℤ) : star (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨x, -y⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_re (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).re = z.re :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem star_im (z : ℤ√d) : (star z).im = -z.im :=
rfl
instance : StarRing (ℤ√d) where
star_involutive _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_neg _)
star_mul a b := by ext <;> simp <;> ring
star_add _ _ := Zsqrtd.ext rfl (neg_add _ _)
-- Porting note: proof was `by decide`
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial (ℤ√d) :=
⟨⟨0, 1, Zsqrtd.ext_iff.not.mpr (by simp)⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem natCast_re (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_re (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).re = n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_im (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_im (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(n) : ℤ√d).im = 0 :=
rfl
theorem natCast_val (n : ℕ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_re (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).re = n := by cases n <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem intCast_im (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d).im = 0 := by cases n <;> rfl
theorem intCast_val (n : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) = ⟨n, 0⟩ := by ext <;> simp
instance : CharZero (ℤ√d) where cast_injective m n := by simp [Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofInt_eq_intCast (n : ℤ) : (ofInt n : ℤ√d) = n := by ext <;> simp [ofInt_re, ofInt_im]
@[simp]
theorem nsmul_val (n : ℕ) (x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smul_val (n x y : ℤ) : (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨n * x, n * y⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem smul_re (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).re = a * b.re := by simp
theorem smul_im (a : ℤ) (b : ℤ√d) : (↑a * b).im = a * b.im := by simp
@[simp]
theorem muld_val (x y : ℤ) : sqrtd (d := d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * y, x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem dmuld : sqrtd (d := d) * sqrtd (d := d) = d := by ext <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem smuld_val (n x y : ℤ) : sqrtd * (n : ℤ√d) * ⟨x, y⟩ = ⟨d * n * y, n * x⟩ := by ext <;> simp
theorem decompose {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x + sqrtd (d := d) * y := by ext <;> simp
theorem mul_star {x y : ℤ} : (⟨x, y⟩ * star ⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) = x * x - d * y * y := by
ext <;> simp [sub_eq_add_neg, mul_comm]
theorem intCast_dvd (z : ℤ) (a : ℤ√d) : ↑z ∣ a ↔ z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, rfl⟩
simp only [add_zero, intCast_re, zero_mul, mul_im, dvd_mul_right, and_self_iff,
mul_re, mul_zero, intCast_im]
· rintro ⟨⟨r, hr⟩, ⟨i, hi⟩⟩
use ⟨r, i⟩
rw [smul_val, Zsqrtd.ext_iff]
exact ⟨hr, hi⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_dvd_intCast (a b : ℤ) : (a : ℤ√d) ∣ b ↔ a ∣ b := by
rw [intCast_dvd]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hre, -⟩
rwa [intCast_re] at hre
· rw [intCast_re, intCast_im]
exact fun hc => ⟨hc, dvd_zero a⟩
protected theorem eq_of_smul_eq_smul_left {a : ℤ} {b c : ℤ√d} (ha : a ≠ 0) (h : ↑a * b = a * c) :
b = c := by
rw [Zsqrtd.ext_iff] at h ⊢
apply And.imp _ _ h <;> simpa only [smul_re, smul_im] using mul_left_cancel₀ ha
section Gcd
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff (a : ℤ√d) : Int.gcd a.re a.im = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
simp only [Int.gcd_eq_zero_iff, Zsqrtd.ext_iff, eq_self_iff_true, zero_im, zero_re]
theorem gcd_pos_iff (a : ℤ√d) : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| not_congr a.gcd_eq_zero_iff
theorem isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime {a b : ℤ√d} (hcoprime : IsCoprime a.re a.im) (hdvd : b ∣ a) :
IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
apply isCoprime_of_dvd
· rintro ⟨hre, him⟩
obtain rfl : b = 0 := Zsqrtd.ext hre him
rw [zero_dvd_iff] at hdvd
simp [hdvd, zero_im, zero_re, not_isCoprime_zero_zero] at hcoprime
· rintro z hz - hzdvdu hzdvdv
apply hz
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ : z ∣ a.re ∧ z ∣ a.im := by
rw [← intCast_dvd]
apply dvd_trans _ hdvd
rw [intCast_dvd]
exact ⟨hzdvdu, hzdvdv⟩
exact hcoprime.isUnit_of_dvd' ha hb
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-23")] alias coprime_of_dvd_coprime := isCoprime_of_dvd_isCoprime
theorem exists_coprime_of_gcd_pos {a : ℤ√d} (hgcd : 0 < Int.gcd a.re a.im) :
∃ b : ℤ√d, a = ((Int.gcd a.re a.im : ℤ) : ℤ√d) * b ∧ IsCoprime b.re b.im := by
obtain ⟨re, im, H1, Hre, Him⟩ := Int.exists_gcd_one hgcd
rw [mul_comm] at Hre Him
refine ⟨⟨re, im⟩, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [smul_val, ← Hre, ← Him]
· rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, H1]
end Gcd
/-- Read `SqLe a c b d` as `a √c ≤ b √d` -/
def SqLe (a c b d : ℕ) : Prop :=
c * a * a ≤ d * b * b
theorem sqLe_of_le {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xz : z ≤ x) (yw : y ≤ w) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe z c w d :=
le_trans (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ xz) xz (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)) <|
le_trans xy (mul_le_mul (Nat.mul_le_mul_left _ yw) yw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _))
theorem sqLe_add_mixed {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
c * (x * z) ≤ d * (y * w) :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 <| by
simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using mul_le_mul xy zw (Nat.zero_le _) (Nat.zero_le _)
theorem sqLe_add {c d x y z w : ℕ} (xy : SqLe x c y d) (zw : SqLe z c w d) :
SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d := by
have xz := sqLe_add_mixed xy zw
simp? [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw says simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc] at xy zw
simp [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_le_add, *]
theorem sqLe_cancel {c d x y z w : ℕ} (zw : SqLe y d x c) (h : SqLe (x + z) c (y + w) d) :
SqLe z c w d := by
apply le_of_not_gt
intro l
refine not_le_of_gt ?_ h
simp only [SqLe, mul_add, mul_comm, mul_left_comm, add_assoc, gt_iff_lt]
have hm := sqLe_add_mixed zw (le_of_lt l)
simp only [SqLe, mul_assoc, gt_iff_lt] at l zw
exact
lt_of_le_of_lt (add_le_add_right zw _)
(add_lt_add_left (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt hm l)) _)
theorem sqLe_smul {c d x y : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (xy : SqLe x c y d) : SqLe (n * x) c (n * y) d := by
simpa [SqLe, mul_left_comm, mul_assoc] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left (n * n) xy
theorem sqLe_mul {d x y z w : ℕ} :
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) ∧
(SqLe x 1 y d → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe z 1 w d → SqLe (x * z + d * y * w) 1 (x * w + y * z) d) ∧
(SqLe y d x 1 → SqLe w d z 1 → SqLe (x * w + y * z) d (x * z + d * y * w) 1) := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
· intro xy zw
have :=
Int.mul_nonneg (sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le xy))
(sub_nonneg_of_le (Int.ofNat_le_ofNat_of_le zw))
refine Int.le_of_ofNat_le_ofNat (le_of_sub_nonneg ?_)
convert this using 1
simp only [one_mul, Int.natCast_add, Int.natCast_mul]
ring
open Int in
/-- "Generalized" `nonneg`. `nonnegg c d x y` means `a √c + b √d ≥ 0`;
we are interested in the case `c = 1` but this is more symmetric -/
def Nonnegg (c d : ℕ) : ℤ → ℤ → Prop
| (a : ℕ), (b : ℕ) => True
| (a : ℕ), -[b+1] => SqLe (b + 1) c a d
| -[a+1], (b : ℕ) => SqLe (a + 1) d b c
| -[_+1], -[_+1] => False
theorem nonnegg_comm {c d : ℕ} {x y : ℤ} : Nonnegg c d x y = Nonnegg d c y x := by
cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
theorem nonnegg_neg_pos {c d} : ∀ {a b : ℕ}, Nonnegg c d (-a) b ↔ SqLe a d b c
| 0, b => ⟨by simp [SqLe, Nat.zero_le], fun _ => trivial⟩
| a + 1, b => by rfl
theorem nonnegg_pos_neg {c d} {a b : ℕ} : Nonnegg c d a (-b) ↔ SqLe b c a d := by
rw [nonnegg_comm]; exact nonnegg_neg_pos
open Int in
theorem nonnegg_cases_right {c d} {a : ℕ} :
∀ {b : ℤ}, (∀ x : ℕ, b = -x → SqLe x c a d) → Nonnegg c d a b
| (b : Nat), _ => trivial
| -[b+1], h => h (b + 1) rfl
theorem nonnegg_cases_left {c d} {b : ℕ} {a : ℤ} (h : ∀ x : ℕ, a = -x → SqLe x d b c) :
Nonnegg c d a b :=
cast nonnegg_comm (nonnegg_cases_right h)
section Norm
/-- The norm of an element of `ℤ[√d]`. -/
def norm (n : ℤ√d) : ℤ :=
n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im
theorem norm_def (n : ℤ√d) : n.norm = n.re * n.re - d * n.im * n.im :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem norm_zero : norm (0 : ℤ√d) = 0 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_one : norm (1 : ℤ√d) = 1 := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_intCast (n : ℤ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n := by simp [norm]
@[simp]
theorem norm_natCast (n : ℕ) : norm (n : ℤ√d) = n * n :=
norm_intCast n
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul (n m : ℤ√d) : norm (n * m) = norm n * norm m := by
simp only [norm, mul_im, mul_re]
ring
/-- `norm` as a `MonoidHom`. -/
def normMonoidHom : ℤ√d →* ℤ where
toFun := norm
map_mul' := norm_mul
map_one' := norm_one
theorem norm_eq_mul_conj (n : ℤ√d) : (norm n : ℤ√d) = n * star n := by
ext <;> simp [norm, star, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem norm_neg (x : ℤ√d) : (-x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj]
@[simp]
theorem norm_conj (x : ℤ√d) : (star x).norm = x.norm :=
(Int.cast_inj (α := ℤ√d)).1 <| by simp [norm_eq_mul_conj, mul_comm]
theorem norm_nonneg (hd : d ≤ 0) (n : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ n.norm :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _)
(by
rw [mul_assoc, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul]
exact mul_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hd) (mul_self_nonneg _))
theorem norm_eq_one_iff {x : ℤ√d} : x.norm.natAbs = 1 ↔ IsUnit x :=
⟨fun h =>
isUnit_iff_dvd_one.2 <|
(le_total 0 (norm x)).casesOn
(fun hx =>
⟨star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
norm_eq_mul_conj, eq_comm] at h⟩)
fun hx =>
⟨-star x, by
rwa [← Int.natCast_inj, Int.ofNat_natAbs_of_nonpos hx, ← @Int.cast_inj (ℤ√d) _ _,
Int.cast_neg, norm_eq_mul_conj, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg, eq_comm] at h⟩,
fun h => by
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := isUnit_iff_dvd_one.1 h
have := congr_arg (Int.natAbs ∘ norm) hy
rw [Function.comp_apply, Function.comp_apply, norm_mul, Int.natAbs_mul, norm_one,
Int.natAbs_one, eq_comm, mul_eq_one] at this
exact this.1⟩
theorem isUnit_iff_norm_isUnit {d : ℤ} (z : ℤ√d) : IsUnit z ↔ IsUnit z.norm := by
rw [Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, norm_eq_one_iff]
theorem norm_eq_one_iff' {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 1 ↔ IsUnit z := by
rw [← norm_eq_one_iff, ← Int.natCast_inj, Int.natAbs_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg hd z), Int.ofNat_one]
theorem norm_eq_zero_iff {d : ℤ} (hd : d < 0) (z : ℤ√d) : z.norm = 0 ↔ z = 0 := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [norm_def, sub_eq_add_neg, mul_assoc] at h
have left := mul_self_nonneg z.re
have right := neg_nonneg.mpr (mul_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_nonneg hd.le (mul_self_nonneg z.im))
obtain ⟨ha, hb⟩ := (add_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg left right).mp h
ext <;> apply eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero
· exact ha
· rw [neg_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero] at hb
exact hb.resolve_left hd.ne
· rintro rfl
exact norm_zero
theorem norm_eq_of_associated {d : ℤ} (hd : d ≤ 0) {x y : ℤ√d} (h : Associated x y) :
x.norm = y.norm := by
obtain ⟨u, rfl⟩ := h
rw [norm_mul, (norm_eq_one_iff' hd _).mpr u.isUnit, mul_one]
end Norm
end
section
variable {d : ℕ}
/-- Nonnegativity of an element of `ℤ√d`. -/
def Nonneg : ℤ√d → Prop
| ⟨a, b⟩ => Nonnegg d 1 a b
instance : LE (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => Nonneg (b - a)⟩
instance : LT (ℤ√d) :=
⟨fun a b => ¬b ≤ a⟩
instance decidableNonnegg (c d a b) : Decidable (Nonnegg c d a b) := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> unfold Nonnegg SqLe <;> infer_instance
instance decidableNonneg : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Decidable (Nonneg a)
| ⟨_, _⟩ => Zsqrtd.decidableNonnegg _ _ _ _
instance decidableLE : DecidableLE (ℤ√d) := fun _ _ => decidableNonneg _
open Int in
theorem nonneg_cases : ∀ {a : ℤ√d}, Nonneg a → ∃ x y : ℕ, a = ⟨x, y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨x, -y⟩ ∨ a = ⟨-x, y⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨(x : ℕ), -[y+1]⟩, _ => ⟨x, y + 1, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], (y : ℕ)⟩, _ => ⟨x + 1, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩, h => False.elim h
open Int in
theorem nonneg_add_lem {x y z w : ℕ} (xy : Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ : ℤ√d)) (zw : Nonneg (⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d)) :
Nonneg (⟨x, -y⟩ + ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) := by
have : Nonneg ⟨Int.subNatNat x z, Int.subNatNat w y⟩ :=
Int.subNatNat_elim x z
(fun m n i => SqLe y d m 1 → SqLe n 1 w d → Nonneg ⟨i, Int.subNatNat w y⟩)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d (k + j) 1 → SqLe k 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨Int.ofNat j, i⟩)
(fun _ _ _ _ => trivial) fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel zw xy)
(fun j k =>
Int.subNatNat_elim w y
(fun m n i => SqLe n d k 1 → SqLe (k + j + 1) 1 m d → Nonneg ⟨-[j+1], i⟩)
(fun m n xy zw => sqLe_cancel xy zw) fun m n xy zw =>
let t := Nat.le_trans zw (sqLe_of_le (Nat.le_add_right n (m + 1)) le_rfl xy)
have : k + j + 1 ≤ k :=
Nat.mul_self_le_mul_self_iff.1 (by simpa [one_mul] using t)
absurd this (not_le_of_gt <| Nat.succ_le_succ <| Nat.le_add_right _ _))
(nonnegg_pos_neg.1 xy) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 zw)
rw [add_def, neg_add_eq_sub]
rwa [Int.subNatNat_eq_coe, Int.subNatNat_eq_coe] at this
theorem Nonneg.add {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a + b) := by
rcases nonneg_cases ha with ⟨x, y, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
rcases nonneg_cases hb with ⟨z, w, rfl | rfl | rfl⟩
· trivial
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro y (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro x (by simp [add_comm, *])))
· apply Nat.le_add_left
· refine nonnegg_cases_right fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro w (by simp [*])))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
· exact nonneg_add_lem ha hb
· refine nonnegg_cases_left fun i h => sqLe_of_le ?_ ?_ (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
· dsimp only at h
exact Int.ofNat_le.1 (le_of_neg_le_neg (Int.le.intro _ h))
· apply Nat.le_add_right
· dsimp
rw [add_comm, add_comm (y : ℤ)]
exact nonneg_add_lem hb ha
· have : Nonneg ⟨_, _⟩ :=
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_add (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_add, neg_add] at this
rwa [add_def]
theorem nonneg_iff_zero_le {a : ℤ√d} : Nonneg a ↔ 0 ≤ a :=
show _ ↔ Nonneg _ by simp
theorem le_of_le_le {x y z w : ℤ} (xz : x ≤ z) (yw : y ≤ w) : (⟨x, y⟩ : ℤ√d) ≤ ⟨z, w⟩ :=
show Nonneg ⟨z - x, w - y⟩ from
match z - x, w - y, Int.le.dest_sub xz, Int.le.dest_sub yw with
| _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => trivial
open Int in
protected theorem nonneg_total : ∀ a : ℤ√d, Nonneg a ∨ Nonneg (-a)
| ⟨(x : ℕ), (y : ℕ)⟩ => Or.inl trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨0, -[_+1]⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨-[_+1], 0⟩ => Or.inr trivial
| ⟨(_ + 1 : ℕ), -[_+1]⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
| ⟨-[_+1], (_ + 1 : ℕ)⟩ => Nat.le_total _ _
protected theorem le_total (a b : ℤ√d) : a ≤ b ∨ b ≤ a := by
have t := (b - a).nonneg_total
rwa [neg_sub] at t
instance preorder : Preorder (ℤ√d) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := show Nonneg (a - a) by simp only [sub_self]; trivial
le_trans a b c hab hbc := by simpa [sub_add_sub_cancel'] using hab.add hbc
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := (and_iff_right_of_imp (Zsqrtd.le_total _ _).resolve_left).symm
open Int in
theorem le_arch (a : ℤ√d) : ∃ n : ℕ, a ≤ n := by
obtain ⟨x, y, (h : a ≤ ⟨x, y⟩)⟩ : ∃ x y : ℕ, Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ + -a) :=
match -a with
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨0, 0, by trivial⟩
| ⟨Int.ofNat x, -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨0, y + 1, by simp [add_def, Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], Int.ofNat y⟩ => ⟨x + 1, 0, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
| ⟨-[x+1], -[y+1]⟩ => ⟨x + 1, y + 1, by simp [Int.negSucc_eq, add_assoc]; trivial⟩
refine ⟨x + d * y, h.trans ?_⟩
change Nonneg ⟨↑x + d * y - ↑x, 0 - ↑y⟩
rcases y with - | y
· simp
trivial
have h : ∀ y, SqLe y d (d * y) 1 := fun y => by
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_right (y * y) (Nat.le_mul_self d)
rw [show (x : ℤ) + d * Nat.succ y - x = d * Nat.succ y by simp]
exact h (y + 1)
protected theorem add_le_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (ab : a ≤ b) (c : ℤ√d) : c + a ≤ c + b :=
show Nonneg _ by rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]; exact ab
protected theorem le_of_add_le_add_left (a b c : ℤ√d) (h : c + a ≤ c + b) : a ≤ b := by
simpa using Zsqrtd.add_le_add_left _ _ h (-c)
protected theorem add_lt_add_left (a b : ℤ√d) (h : a < b) (c) : c + a < c + b := fun h' =>
h (Zsqrtd.le_of_add_le_add_left _ _ _ h')
theorem nonneg_smul {a : ℤ√d} {n : ℕ} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg ((n : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [← Int.cast_natCast n]
exact
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => by rw [smul_val]; trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
rw [smul_val]; simpa using nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_smul n <| nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_muld {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (sqrtd * a) :=
match a, nonneg_cases ha, ha with
| _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _ => trivial
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val, mul_neg]
apply nonnegg_neg_pos.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha)
| _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha => by
simp only [muld_val]
apply nonnegg_pos_neg.2
simpa [SqLe, mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using Nat.mul_le_mul_left d (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha)
theorem nonneg_mul_lem {x y : ℕ} {a : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) : Nonneg (⟨x, y⟩ * a) := by
have : (⟨x, y⟩ * a : ℤ√d) = (x : ℤ√d) * a + sqrtd * ((y : ℤ√d) * a) := by
rw [decompose, right_distrib, mul_assoc, Int.cast_natCast, Int.cast_natCast]
rw [this]
exact (nonneg_smul ha).add (nonneg_muld <| nonneg_smul ha)
theorem nonneg_mul {a b : ℤ√d} (ha : Nonneg a) (hb : Nonneg b) : Nonneg (a * b) :=
match a, b, nonneg_cases ha, nonneg_cases hb, ha, hb with
| _, _, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨_, _, Or.inl rfl⟩, _, _ => trivial
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, _, hb => nonneg_mul_lem hb
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, _ => by
rw [mul_comm]; exact nonneg_mul_lem ha
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_pos_neg.2 (sqLe_mul.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨-x, y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.left (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inr rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨-z, w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨-(x * z + d * y * w), x * w + y * z⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_neg_pos.2 (sqLe_mul.right.right.left (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_neg_pos.1 hb))
| _, _, ⟨x, y, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ⟨z, w, Or.inr <| Or.inl rfl⟩, ha, hb => by
rw [calc
(⟨x, -y⟩ * ⟨z, -w⟩ : ℤ√d) = ⟨_, _⟩ := rfl
_ = ⟨x * z + d * y * w, -(x * w + y * z)⟩ := by simp [add_comm]
]
exact
nonnegg_pos_neg.2
(sqLe_mul.right.right.right (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 ha) (nonnegg_pos_neg.1 hb))
protected theorem mul_nonneg (a b : ℤ√d) : 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → 0 ≤ a * b := by
simp_rw [← nonneg_iff_zero_le]
exact nonneg_mul
theorem not_sqLe_succ (c d y) (h : 0 < c) : ¬SqLe (y + 1) c 0 d :=
not_le_of_gt <| mul_pos (mul_pos h <| Nat.succ_pos _) <| Nat.succ_pos _
-- Porting note: renamed field and added theorem to make `x` explicit
/-- A nonsquare is a natural number that is not equal to the square of an
integer. This is implemented as a typeclass because it's a necessary condition
for much of the Pell equation theory. -/
class Nonsquare (x : ℕ) : Prop where
ns' : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n
theorem Nonsquare.ns (x : ℕ) [Nonsquare x] : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≠ n * n := ns'
variable [dnsq : Nonsquare d]
theorem d_pos : 0 < d :=
lt_of_le_of_ne (Nat.zero_le _) <| Ne.symm <| Nonsquare.ns d 0
theorem divides_sq_eq_zero {x y} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 :=
let g := x.gcd y
Or.elim g.eq_zero_or_pos
(fun H => ⟨Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_left H, Nat.eq_zero_of_gcd_eq_zero_right H⟩) fun gpos =>
False.elim <| by
let ⟨m, n, co, (hx : x = m * g), (hy : y = n * g)⟩ := Nat.exists_coprime _ _
rw [hx, hy] at h
have : m * m = d * (n * n) := by
refine mul_left_cancel₀ (mul_pos gpos gpos).ne' ?_
-- Porting note: was `simpa [mul_comm, mul_left_comm] using h`
calc
g * g * (m * m)
_ = m * g * (m * g) := by ring
_ = d * (n * g) * (n * g) := h
_ = g * g * (d * (n * n)) := by ring
have co2 :=
let co1 := co.mul_right co
co1.mul co1
exact
Nonsquare.ns d m
(Nat.dvd_antisymm (by rw [this]; apply dvd_mul_right) <|
co2.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right <| by simp [this])
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Zsqrtd/Basic.lean | 770 | 771 | theorem divides_sq_eq_zero_z {x y : ℤ} (h : x * x = d * y * y) : x = 0 ∧ y = 0 := by | rw [mul_assoc, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natAbs_mul_self, ← Int.natCast_mul, ← mul_assoc] at h |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Peter Pfaffelhuber, Yaël Dillies, Kin Yau James Wong
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.Constructions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.PiSystem
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# π-systems of cylinders and square cylinders
The instance `MeasurableSpace.pi` on `∀ i, α i`, where each `α i` has a `MeasurableSpace` `m i`,
is defined as `⨆ i, (m i).comap (fun a => a i)`.
That is, a function `g : β → ∀ i, α i` is measurable iff for all `i`, the function `b ↦ g b i`
is measurable.
We define two π-systems generating `MeasurableSpace.pi`, cylinders and square cylinders.
## Main definitions
Given a finite set `s` of indices, a cylinder is the product of a set of `∀ i : s, α i` and of
`univ` on the other indices. A square cylinder is a cylinder for which the set on `∀ i : s, α i` is
a product set.
* `cylinder s S`: cylinder with base set `S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)` where `s` is a `Finset`
* `squareCylinders C` with `C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))`: set of all square cylinders such that for
all `i` in the finset defining the box, the projection to `α i` belongs to `C i`. The main
application of this is with `C i = {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}`.
* `measurableCylinders`: set of all cylinders with measurable base sets.
* `cylinderEvents Δ`: The σ-algebra of cylinder events on `Δ`. It is the smallest σ-algebra making
the projections on the `i`-th coordinate continuous for all `i ∈ Δ`.
## Main statements
* `generateFrom_squareCylinders`: square cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the product
σ-algebra
* `generateFrom_measurableCylinders`: cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the
product σ-algebra
-/
open Function Set
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {ι : Type _} {α : ι → Type _}
section squareCylinders
/-- Given a finite set `s` of indices, a square cylinder is the product of a set `S` of
`∀ i : s, α i` and of `univ` on the other indices. The set `S` is a product of sets `t i` such that
for all `i : s`, `t i ∈ C i`.
`squareCylinders` is the set of all such squareCylinders. -/
def squareCylinders (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) : Set (Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
{S | ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ t ∈ univ.pi C, S = (s : Set ι).pi t}
theorem squareCylinders_eq_iUnion_image (C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))) :
squareCylinders C = ⋃ s : Finset ι, (fun t ↦ (s : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi C := by
ext1 f
simp only [squareCylinders, mem_iUnion, mem_image, mem_univ_pi, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq,
eq_comm (a := f)]
theorem isPiSystem_squareCylinders {C : ∀ i, Set (Set (α i))} (hC : ∀ i, IsPiSystem (C i))
(hC_univ : ∀ i, univ ∈ C i) :
IsPiSystem (squareCylinders C) := by
rintro S₁ ⟨s₁, t₁, h₁, rfl⟩ S₂ ⟨s₂, t₂, h₂, rfl⟩ hst_nonempty
classical
let t₁' := s₁.piecewise t₁ (fun i ↦ univ)
let t₂' := s₂.piecewise t₂ (fun i ↦ univ)
have h1 : ∀ i ∈ (s₁ : Set ι), t₁ i = t₁' i :=
fun i hi ↦ (Finset.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hi).symm
have h1' : ∀ i ∉ (s₁ : Set ι), t₁' i = univ :=
fun i hi ↦ Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hi
have h2 : ∀ i ∈ (s₂ : Set ι), t₂ i = t₂' i :=
fun i hi ↦ (Finset.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ hi).symm
have h2' : ∀ i ∉ (s₂ : Set ι), t₂' i = univ :=
fun i hi ↦ Finset.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ hi
rw [Set.pi_congr rfl h1, Set.pi_congr rfl h2, ← union_pi_inter h1' h2']
refine ⟨s₁ ∪ s₂, fun i ↦ t₁' i ∩ t₂' i, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [mem_univ_pi]
intro i
have : (t₁' i ∩ t₂' i).Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨f, hf⟩ := hst_nonempty
rw [Set.pi_congr rfl h1, Set.pi_congr rfl h2, mem_inter_iff, mem_pi, mem_pi] at hf
refine ⟨f i, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· by_cases hi₁ : i ∈ s₁
· exact hf.1 i hi₁
· rw [h1' i hi₁]
exact mem_univ _
· by_cases hi₂ : i ∈ s₂
· exact hf.2 i hi₂
· rw [h2' i hi₂]
exact mem_univ _
refine hC i _ ?_ _ ?_ this
· by_cases hi₁ : i ∈ s₁
· rw [← h1 i hi₁]
exact h₁ i (mem_univ _)
· rw [h1' i hi₁]
exact hC_univ i
· by_cases hi₂ : i ∈ s₂
· rw [← h2 i hi₂]
exact h₂ i (mem_univ _)
· rw [h2' i hi₂]
exact hC_univ i
· rw [Finset.coe_union]
theorem comap_eval_le_generateFrom_squareCylinders_singleton
(α : ι → Type*) [m : ∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (i : ι) :
MeasurableSpace.comap (Function.eval i) (m i) ≤
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom
((fun t ↦ ({i} : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi fun i ↦ {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}) := by
simp only [Function.eval, singleton_pi]
rw [MeasurableSpace.comap_eq_generateFrom]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_mono fun S ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, mem_image, mem_univ_pi, forall_exists_index, and_imp]
intro t ht h
classical
refine ⟨fun j ↦ if hji : j = i then by convert t else univ, fun j ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases hji : j = i
· simp only [hji, eq_self_iff_true, eq_mpr_eq_cast, dif_pos]
convert ht
simp only [id_eq, cast_heq]
· simp only [hji, not_false_iff, dif_neg, MeasurableSet.univ]
· simp only [id_eq, eq_mpr_eq_cast, ← h]
ext1 x
simp only [singleton_pi, Function.eval, cast_eq, dite_eq_ite, ite_true, mem_preimage]
/-- The square cylinders formed from measurable sets generate the product σ-algebra. -/
theorem generateFrom_squareCylinders [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
MeasurableSpace.generateFrom (squareCylinders fun i ↦ {s : Set (α i) | MeasurableSet s}) =
MeasurableSpace.pi := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le_iff]
rintro S ⟨s, t, h, rfl⟩
simp only [mem_univ_pi, mem_setOf_eq] at h
exact MeasurableSet.pi (Finset.countable_toSet _) (fun i _ ↦ h i)
· refine iSup_le fun i ↦ ?_
refine (comap_eval_le_generateFrom_squareCylinders_singleton α i).trans ?_
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_mono ?_
rw [← Finset.coe_singleton, squareCylinders_eq_iUnion_image]
exact subset_iUnion
(fun (s : Finset ι) ↦
(fun t : ∀ i, Set (α i) ↦ (s : Set ι).pi t) '' univ.pi (fun i ↦ setOf MeasurableSet))
({i} : Finset ι)
end squareCylinders
section cylinder
/-- Given a finite set `s` of indices, a cylinder is the preimage of a set `S` of `∀ i : s, α i` by
the projection from `∀ i, α i` to `∀ i : s, α i`. -/
def cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) : Set (∀ i, α i) :=
s.restrict ⁻¹' S
@[simp]
theorem mem_cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (f : ∀ i, α i) :
f ∈ cylinder s S ↔ s.restrict f ∈ S :=
mem_preimage
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_empty (s : Finset ι) : cylinder s (∅ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) = ∅ := by
rw [cylinder, preimage_empty]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_univ (s : Finset ι) : cylinder s (univ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) = univ := by
rw [cylinder, preimage_univ]
@[simp]
theorem cylinder_eq_empty_iff [h_nonempty : Nonempty (∀ i, α i)] (s : Finset ι)
(S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S = ∅ ↔ S = ∅ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by (rw [h]; exact cylinder_empty _)⟩
by_contra hS
rw [← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at hS
let f := hS.some
have hf : f ∈ S := hS.choose_spec
classical
let f' : ∀ i, α i := fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ s then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else h_nonempty.some i
have hf' : f' ∈ cylinder s S := by
rw [mem_cylinder]
simpa only [Finset.restrict_def, Finset.coe_mem, dif_pos, f']
rw [h] at hf'
exact not_mem_empty _ hf'
theorem inter_cylinder (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s₁, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s₂, α i))
[DecidableEq ι] :
cylinder s₁ S₁ ∩ cylinder s₂ S₂ =
cylinder (s₁ ∪ s₂)
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S₁ ∩
Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right ⁻¹' S₂) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_inter_iff, mem_cylinder, mem_setOf_eq]; rfl
theorem inter_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S₁ ∩ cylinder s S₂ = cylinder s (S₁ ∩ S₂) := by
classical rw [inter_cylinder]; rfl
theorem union_cylinder (s₁ s₂ : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s₁, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s₂, α i))
[DecidableEq ι] :
cylinder s₁ S₁ ∪ cylinder s₂ S₂ =
cylinder (s₁ ∪ s₂)
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S₁ ∪
Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right ⁻¹' S₂) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_union, mem_cylinder, mem_setOf_eq]; rfl
theorem union_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S₁ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) (S₂ : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S₁ ∪ cylinder s S₂ = cylinder s (S₁ ∪ S₂) := by
classical rw [union_cylinder]; rfl
theorem compl_cylinder (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
(cylinder s S)ᶜ = cylinder s (Sᶜ) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_cylinder]
theorem diff_cylinder_same (s : Finset ι) (S T : Set (∀ i : s, α i)) :
cylinder s S \ cylinder s T = cylinder s (S \ T) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_diff, mem_cylinder]
theorem eq_of_cylinder_eq_of_subset [h_nonempty : Nonempty (∀ i, α i)] {I J : Finset ι}
{S : Set (∀ i : I, α i)} {T : Set (∀ i : J, α i)} (h_eq : cylinder I S = cylinder J T)
(hJI : J ⊆ I) :
S = Finset.restrict₂ hJI ⁻¹' T := by
rw [Set.ext_iff] at h_eq
simp only [mem_cylinder] at h_eq
ext1 f
simp only [mem_preimage]
classical
specialize h_eq fun i ↦ if hi : i ∈ I then f ⟨i, hi⟩ else h_nonempty.some i
have h_mem : ∀ j : J, ↑j ∈ I := fun j ↦ hJI j.prop
simpa only [Finset.restrict_def, Finset.coe_mem, dite_true, h_mem] using h_eq
theorem cylinder_eq_cylinder_union [DecidableEq ι] (I : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : I, α i))
(J : Finset ι) :
cylinder I S =
cylinder (I ∪ J) (Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S) := by
ext1 f; simp only [mem_cylinder, Finset.restrict_def, Finset.restrict₂_def, mem_preimage]
theorem disjoint_cylinder_iff [Nonempty (∀ i, α i)] {s t : Finset ι} {S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)}
{T : Set (∀ i : t, α i)} [DecidableEq ι] :
Disjoint (cylinder s S) (cylinder t T) ↔
Disjoint
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S)
(Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right ⁻¹' T) := by
simp_rw [Set.disjoint_iff, subset_empty_iff, inter_cylinder, cylinder_eq_empty_iff]
theorem IsClosed.cylinder [∀ i, TopologicalSpace (α i)] (s : Finset ι) {S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)}
(hs : IsClosed S) : IsClosed (cylinder s S) :=
hs.preimage (continuous_pi fun _ ↦ continuous_apply _)
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.cylinder [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] (s : Finset ι)
{S : Set (∀ i : s, α i)} (hS : MeasurableSet S) :
MeasurableSet (cylinder s S) :=
measurable_pi_lambda _ (fun _ ↦ measurable_pi_apply _) hS
/-- The indicator of a cylinder only depends on the variables whose the cylinder depends on. -/
theorem dependsOn_cylinder_indicator_const {M : Type*} [Zero M] {I : Finset ι}
(S : Set (Π i : I, α i)) (c : M) :
DependsOn ((cylinder I S).indicator (fun _ ↦ c)) I :=
fun x y hxy ↦ Set.indicator_const_eq_indicator_const (by simp [Finset.restrict_def, hxy])
end cylinder
section cylinders
/-- Given a finite set `s` of indices, a cylinder is the preimage of a set `S` of `∀ i : s, α i` by
the projection from `∀ i, α i` to `∀ i : s, α i`.
`measurableCylinders` is the set of all cylinders with measurable base `S`. -/
def measurableCylinders (α : ι → Type*) [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] : Set (Set (∀ i, α i)) :=
⋃ (s) (S) (_ : MeasurableSet S), {cylinder s S}
theorem empty_mem_measurableCylinders (α : ι → Type*) [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] :
∅ ∈ measurableCylinders α := by
simp_rw [measurableCylinders, mem_iUnion, mem_singleton_iff]
exact ⟨∅, ∅, MeasurableSet.empty, (cylinder_empty _).symm⟩
variable [∀ i, MeasurableSpace (α i)] {s t : Set (∀ i, α i)}
@[simp]
theorem mem_measurableCylinders (t : Set (∀ i, α i)) :
t ∈ measurableCylinders α ↔ ∃ s S, MeasurableSet S ∧ t = cylinder s S := by
simp_rw [measurableCylinders, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableSet.of_mem_measurableCylinders {s : Set (Π i, α i)}
(hs : s ∈ measurableCylinders α) : MeasurableSet s := by
obtain ⟨I, t, mt, rfl⟩ := (mem_measurableCylinders s).1 hs
exact mt.cylinder
/-- A finset `s` such that `t = cylinder s S`. `S` is given by `measurableCylinders.set`. -/
noncomputable def measurableCylinders.finset (ht : t ∈ measurableCylinders α) : Finset ι :=
((mem_measurableCylinders t).mp ht).choose
/-- A set `S` such that `t = cylinder s S`. `s` is given by `measurableCylinders.finset`. -/
def measurableCylinders.set (ht : t ∈ measurableCylinders α) :
Set (∀ i : measurableCylinders.finset ht, α i) :=
((mem_measurableCylinders t).mp ht).choose_spec.choose
theorem measurableCylinders.measurableSet (ht : t ∈ measurableCylinders α) :
MeasurableSet (measurableCylinders.set ht) :=
((mem_measurableCylinders t).mp ht).choose_spec.choose_spec.left
theorem measurableCylinders.eq_cylinder (ht : t ∈ measurableCylinders α) :
t = cylinder (measurableCylinders.finset ht) (measurableCylinders.set ht) :=
((mem_measurableCylinders t).mp ht).choose_spec.choose_spec.right
theorem cylinder_mem_measurableCylinders (s : Finset ι) (S : Set (∀ i : s, α i))
(hS : MeasurableSet S) :
cylinder s S ∈ measurableCylinders α := by
rw [mem_measurableCylinders]; exact ⟨s, S, hS, rfl⟩
theorem inter_mem_measurableCylinders (hs : s ∈ measurableCylinders α)
(ht : t ∈ measurableCylinders α) :
s ∩ t ∈ measurableCylinders α := by
rw [mem_measurableCylinders] at *
obtain ⟨s₁, S₁, hS₁, rfl⟩ := hs
obtain ⟨s₂, S₂, hS₂, rfl⟩ := ht
classical
refine ⟨s₁ ∪ s₂,
Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_left ⁻¹' S₁ ∩
{f | Finset.restrict₂ Finset.subset_union_right f ∈ S₂}, ?_, ?_⟩
· refine MeasurableSet.inter ?_ ?_
· exact measurable_pi_lambda _ (fun _ ↦ measurable_pi_apply _) hS₁
· exact measurable_pi_lambda _ (fun _ ↦ measurable_pi_apply _) hS₂
· exact inter_cylinder _ _ _ _
theorem isPiSystem_measurableCylinders : IsPiSystem (measurableCylinders α) :=
fun _ hS _ hT _ ↦ inter_mem_measurableCylinders hS hT
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Constructions/Cylinders.lean | 328 | 333 | theorem compl_mem_measurableCylinders (hs : s ∈ measurableCylinders α) :
sᶜ ∈ measurableCylinders α := by | rw [mem_measurableCylinders] at hs ⊢
obtain ⟨s, S, hS, rfl⟩ := hs
refine ⟨s, Sᶜ, hS.compl, ?_⟩
rw [compl_cylinder] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.NonUnitalHom
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Basic
/-!
# Facts about algebras involving bilinear maps and tensor products
We move a few basic statements about algebras out of `Algebra.Algebra.Basic`,
in order to avoid importing `LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap` and
`LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct` unnecessarily.
-/
open TensorProduct Module
namespace LinearMap
section NonUnitalNonAssoc
variable (R A : Type*)
section one_side
variable [Semiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
section left
variable {A} [SMulCommClass R A A]
/-- The multiplication on the left in a algebra is a linear map.
Note that this only assumes `SMulCommClass R A A`, so that it also works for `R := Aᵐᵒᵖ`.
When `A` is unital and associative, this is the same as `DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R A a` -/
def mulLeft (a : A) : A →ₗ[R] A where
toFun := (a * ·)
map_add' := mul_add _
map_smul' _ := mul_smul_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_apply (a b : A) : mulLeft R a b = a * b := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_toAddMonoidHom (a : A) : (mulLeft R a : A →+ A) = AddMonoidHom.mulLeft a := rfl
variable (A) in
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_zero_eq_zero : mulLeft R (0 : A) = 0 := ext fun _ => zero_mul _
end left
section right
variable {A} [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- The multiplication on the right in an algebra is a linear map.
Note that this only assumes `IsScalarTower R A A`, so that it also works for `R := A`.
When `A` is unital and associative, this is the same as
`DistribMulAction.toLinearMap R A (MulOpposite.op b)`. -/
def mulRight (b : A) : A →ₗ[R] A where
toFun := (· * b)
map_add' _ _ := add_mul _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := smul_mul_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_apply (a b : A) : mulRight R a b = b * a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_toAddMonoidHom (a : A) : (mulRight R a : A →+ A) = AddMonoidHom.mulRight a := rfl
variable (A) in
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_zero_eq_zero : mulRight R (0 : A) = 0 := ext fun _ => mul_zero _
end right
end one_side
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring A] [Module R A]
variable [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
/-- The multiplication in a non-unital non-associative algebra is a bilinear map.
A weaker version of this for semirings exists as `AddMonoidHom.mul`. -/
@[simps!]
def mul : A →ₗ[R] A →ₗ[R] A :=
LinearMap.mk₂ R (· * ·) add_mul smul_mul_assoc mul_add mul_smul_comm
/-- The multiplication map on a non-unital algebra, as an `R`-linear map from `A ⊗[R] A` to `A`. -/
-- TODO: upgrade to A-linear map if A is a semiring.
noncomputable def mul' : A ⊗[R] A →ₗ[R] A :=
TensorProduct.lift (mul R A)
variable {A}
/-- Simultaneous multiplication on the left and right is a linear map. -/
def mulLeftRight (ab : A × A) : A →ₗ[R] A :=
(mulRight R ab.snd).comp (mulLeft R ab.fst)
variable {R}
@[simp]
theorem mul_apply' (a b : A) : mul R A a b = a * b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mulLeftRight_apply (a b x : A) : mulLeftRight R (a, b) x = a * x * b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul'_apply {a b : A} : mul' R A (a ⊗ₜ b) = a * b :=
rfl
end NonUnitalNonAssoc
section NonUnital
variable (R A B : Type*)
section one_side
variable [Semiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [Module R A]
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_mul [SMulCommClass R A A] (a b : A) :
mulLeft R (a * b) = (mulLeft R a).comp (mulLeft R b) := by
ext
simp only [mulLeft_apply, comp_apply, mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_mul [IsScalarTower R A A] (a b : A) :
mulRight R (a * b) = (mulRight R b).comp (mulRight R a) := by
ext
simp only [mulRight_apply, comp_apply, mul_assoc]
end one_side
variable [CommSemiring R] [NonUnitalSemiring A] [NonUnitalSemiring B] [Module R B] [Module R A]
variable [SMulCommClass R A A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
variable [SMulCommClass R B B] [IsScalarTower R B B]
/-- The multiplication in a non-unital algebra is a bilinear map.
A weaker version of this for non-unital non-associative algebras exists as `LinearMap.mul`. -/
def _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul : A →ₙₐ[R] End R A where
__ := mul R A
map_mul' := mulLeft_mul _ _
map_zero' := mulLeft_zero_eq_zero _ _
variable {R A B}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.NonUnitalAlgHom.coe_lmul_eq_mul : ⇑(NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul R A) = mul R A :=
rfl
theorem commute_mulLeft_right (a b : A) : Commute (mulLeft R a) (mulRight R b) := by
ext c
exact (mul_assoc a c b).symm
/-- A `LinearMap` preserves multiplication if pre- and post- composition with `LinearMap.mul` are
equivalent. By converting the statement into an equality of `LinearMap`s, this lemma allows various
specialized `ext` lemmas about `→ₗ[R]` to then be applied.
This is the `LinearMap` version of `AddMonoidHom.map_mul_iff`. -/
theorem map_mul_iff (f : A →ₗ[R] B) :
(∀ x y, f (x * y) = f x * f y) ↔
(LinearMap.mul R A).compr₂ f = (LinearMap.mul R B ∘ₗ f).compl₂ f :=
Iff.symm LinearMap.ext_iff₂
end NonUnital
section Semiring
variable (R A : Type*)
section one_side
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring A]
section left
variable [Module R A] [SMulCommClass R A A]
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_one : mulLeft R (1 : A) = LinearMap.id := ext fun _ => one_mul _
@[simp]
theorem mulLeft_eq_zero_iff (a : A) : mulLeft R a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← mul_one a, ← mulLeft_apply R a 1, h, LinearMap.zero_apply]
· rw [h]
exact mulLeft_zero_eq_zero _ _
@[simp]
theorem pow_mulLeft (a : A) (n : ℕ) : mulLeft R a ^ n = mulLeft R (a ^ n) :=
match n with
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, mulLeft_one, Module.End.one_eq_id]
| (n + 1) => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ, mulLeft_mul, Module.End.mul_eq_comp, pow_mulLeft]
end left
section right
variable [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R A A]
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_one : mulRight R (1 : A) = LinearMap.id := ext fun _ => mul_one _
@[simp]
theorem mulRight_eq_zero_iff (a : A) : mulRight R a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [← one_mul a, ← mulRight_apply R a 1, h, LinearMap.zero_apply]
· rw [h]
exact mulRight_zero_eq_zero _ _
@[simp]
theorem pow_mulRight (a : A) (n : ℕ) : mulRight R a ^ n = mulRight R (a ^ n) :=
match n with
| 0 => by rw [pow_zero, pow_zero, mulRight_one, Module.End.one_eq_id]
| (n + 1) => by rw [pow_succ, pow_succ', mulRight_mul, Module.End.mul_eq_comp, pow_mulRight]
end right
end one_side
variable [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [Algebra R A]
/-- The multiplication in an algebra is an algebra homomorphism into the endomorphisms on
the algebra.
A weaker version of this for non-unital algebras exists as `NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul`. -/
def _root_.Algebra.lmul : A →ₐ[R] End R A where
__ := NonUnitalAlgHom.lmul R A
map_one' := mulLeft_one _ _
commutes' r := ext fun a => (Algebra.smul_def r a).symm
variable {R A}
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Algebra.coe_lmul_eq_mul : ⇑(Algebra.lmul R A) = mul R A :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Algebra.lmul_injective : Function.Injective (Algebra.lmul R A) :=
fun a₁ a₂ h ↦ by simpa using DFunLike.congr_fun h 1
| Mathlib/Algebra/Algebra/Bilinear.lean | 241 | 244 | theorem _root_.Algebra.lmul_isUnit_iff {x : A} :
IsUnit (Algebra.lmul R A x) ↔ IsUnit x := by | rw [Module.End.isUnit_iff, Iff.comm]
exact IsUnit.isUnit_iff_mulLeft_bijective |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
/-!
# Support of a function
In this file we define `Function.support f = {x | f x ≠ 0}` and prove its basic properties.
We also define `Function.mulSupport f = {x | f x ≠ 1}`.
-/
assert_not_exists CompleteLattice MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Function
variable {α β A B M M' N P G : Type*}
section One
variable [One M] [One N] [One P]
/-- `mulSupport` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive "`support` of a function is the set of points `x` such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
def mulSupport (f : α → M) : Set α := {x | f x ≠ 1}
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_preimage (f : α → M) : mulSupport f = f ⁻¹' {1}ᶜ :=
rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem nmem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∉ mulSupport f ↔ f x = 1 :=
not_not
@[to_additive]
theorem compl_mulSupport {f : α → M} : (mulSupport f)ᶜ = { x | f x = 1 } :=
ext fun _ => nmem_mulSupport
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mem_mulSupport {f : α → M} {x : α} : x ∈ mulSupport f ↔ f x ≠ 1 :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} : mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x, f x ≠ 1 → x ∈ s :=
Iff.rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_subset_iff' {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ x ∉ s, f x = 1 :=
forall_congr' fun _ => not_imp_comm
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_eq_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
mulSupport f = s ↔ (∀ x, x ∈ s → f x ≠ 1) ∧ ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 1 := by
simp +contextual only [Set.ext_iff, mem_mulSupport, ne_eq, iff_def,
not_imp_comm, and_comm, forall_and]
@[to_additive]
theorem ext_iff_mulSupport {f g : α → M} :
f = g ↔ f.mulSupport = g.mulSupport ∧ ∀ x ∈ f.mulSupport, f x = g x :=
⟨fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨rfl, fun _ _ ↦ rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ funext fun x ↦ by
if hx : x ∈ f.mulSupport then exact h₂ x hx
else rw [nmem_mulSupport.1 hx, nmem_mulSupport.1 (mt (Set.ext_iff.1 h₁ x).2 hx)]⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_of_ne_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) {y : M} (hy : y ≠ 1) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = insert x (mulSupport f) := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_one [DecidableEq α] (f : α → M) (x : α) :
mulSupport (update f x 1) = mulSupport f \ {x} := by
ext a; rcases eq_or_ne a x with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_update_eq_ite [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq M] (f : α → M) (x : α) (y : M) :
mulSupport (update f x y) = if y = 1 then mulSupport f \ {x} else insert x (mulSupport f) := by
rcases eq_or_ne y 1 with rfl | hy <;> simp [mulSupport_update_one, mulSupport_update_of_ne_one, *]
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one_subset {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) ⊆ f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_subset_iff'.mpr fun x hfg ↦ by
by_cases hf : ∃ a, f a = x
· rw [extend, dif_pos hf, ← nmem_mulSupport]
rw [← Classical.choose_spec hf] at hfg
exact fun hg ↦ hfg ⟨_, hg, rfl⟩
· rw [extend_apply' _ _ _ hf]; rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem mulSupport_extend_one {f : α → M'} {g : α → N} (hf : f.Injective) :
mulSupport (f.extend g 1) = f '' mulSupport g :=
mulSupport_extend_one_subset.antisymm <| by
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; rwa [mem_mulSupport, hf.extend_apply]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Support.lean | 103 | 110 | theorem mulSupport_disjoint_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint (mulSupport f) s ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by | simp_rw [← subset_compl_iff_disjoint_right, mulSupport_subset_iff', not_mem_compl_iff, EqOn,
Pi.one_apply]
@[to_additive]
theorem disjoint_mulSupport_iff {f : α → M} {s : Set α} :
Disjoint s (mulSupport f) ↔ EqOn f 1 s := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 583 | 585 | theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by | simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} : |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.AtTopBot.Archimedean
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Algebra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Real
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.EReal.Lemmas
/-!
# A collection of specific limit computations
This file, by design, is independent of `NormedSpace` in the import hierarchy. It contains
important specific limit computations in metric spaces, in ordered rings/fields, and in specific
instances of these such as `ℝ`, `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`.
-/
assert_not_exists Basis NormedSpace
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter Finset Metric Topology Nat uniformity NNReal ENNReal
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {ι : Type*}
theorem tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa only [mul_zero] using tendsto_const_nhds.mul tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem tendsto_one_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1/(n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1
theorem NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [← NNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem NNReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (C : ℝ≥0) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
simpa using tendsto_const_nhds.mul NNReal.tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
theorem EReal.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {C : EReal} (h : C ≠ ⊥) (h' : C ≠ ⊤) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : (fun n : ℕ ↦ C / n) = fun n : ℕ ↦ ((C.toReal / n : ℝ) : EReal) := by
ext n
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal h' h, ← coe_coe_eq_natCast n, ← coe_div C.toReal n]
rw [this, ← coe_zero, tendsto_coe]
exact _root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat C.toReal
theorem tendsto_one_div_add_atTop_nhds_zero_nat :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / ((n : ℝ) + 1)) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
suffices Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (↑(n + 1) : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) by simpa
(tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).2 (_root_.tendsto_const_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 1)
theorem NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜]
[Algebra ℝ≥0 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ≥0 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ≥0)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert (continuous_algebraMap ℝ≥0 𝕜).continuousAt.tendsto.comp
tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero]
theorem tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat (𝕜 : Type*) [Semiring 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] :
Tendsto (algebraMap ℝ 𝕜 ∘ fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : ℝ)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_algebraMap_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat 𝕜
/-- The limit of `n / (n + x)` is 1, for any constant `x` (valid in `ℝ` or any topological division
algebra over `ℝ`, e.g., `ℂ`).
TODO: introduce a typeclass saying that `1 / n` tends to 0 at top, making it possible to get this
statement simultaneously on `ℚ`, `ℝ` and `ℂ`. -/
theorem tendsto_natCast_div_add_atTop {𝕜 : Type*} [DivisionRing 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜]
[CharZero 𝕜] [Algebra ℝ 𝕜] [ContinuousSMul ℝ 𝕜] [IsTopologicalDivisionRing 𝕜] (x : 𝕜) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (n : 𝕜) / (n + x)) atTop (𝓝 1) := by
convert Tendsto.congr' ((eventually_ne_atTop 0).mp (Eventually.of_forall fun n hn ↦ _)) _
· exact fun n : ℕ ↦ 1 / (1 + x / n)
· field_simp [Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr hn]
· have : 𝓝 (1 : 𝕜) = 𝓝 (1 / (1 + x * (0 : 𝕜))) := by
rw [mul_zero, add_zero, div_one]
rw [this]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.div (tendsto_const_nhds.add ?_) (by simp)
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv]
refine tendsto_const_nhds.mul ?_
have := ((continuous_algebraMap ℝ 𝕜).tendsto _).comp tendsto_inverse_atTop_nhds_zero_nat
rw [map_zero, Filter.tendsto_atTop'] at this
refine Iff.mpr tendsto_atTop' ?_
intros
simp_all only [comp_apply, map_inv₀, map_natCast]
/-- For any positive `m : ℕ`, `((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)` tends to `0` as `n` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem tendsto_mod_div_atTop_nhds_zero_nat {m : ℕ} (hm : 0 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ) / (n : ℝ)) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have h0 : ∀ᶠ n : ℕ in atTop, 0 ≤ (fun n : ℕ => ((n % m : ℕ) : ℝ)) n := by aesop
exact tendsto_bdd_div_atTop_nhds_zero h0
(.of_forall (fun n ↦ cast_le.mpr (mod_lt n hm).le)) tendsto_natCast_atTop_atTop
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel {α G : Type*} [GroupWithZero G] {f g : α → G}
{l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l (𝓟 {0}ᶜ)) : (fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x := by
filter_upwards [hg.le_comap <| preimage_mem_comap (m := g) (mem_principal_self {0}ᶜ)] with x hx
aesop
/-- If `g` tends to `∞`, then eventually for all `x` we have `(f x / g x) * g x = f x`. -/
theorem Filter.EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Semifield K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) :
(fun x ↦ f x / g x * g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x ↦ f x :=
div_mul_cancel <| hg.mono_right <| le_principal_iff.mpr <|
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) <| by simp
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
{f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hg : Tendsto g l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop :=
(hlim.pos_mul_atTop ha hg).congr' (EventuallyEq.div_mul_cancel_atTop hg)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `g` tends to `∞` and `f x / g x` tends to a positive
constant, then `f` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.den {α K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
[TopologicalSpace K] [OrderTopology K]
[ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto g l atTop :=
have hlim' : Tendsto (fun x => g x / f x) l (𝓝 a⁻¹) := by
simp_rw [← inv_div (f _)]
exact Filter.Tendsto.inv (f := fun x => f x / g x) hlim
(hlim'.pos_mul_atTop (inv_pos_of_pos ha) hf).congr' (.div_mul_cancel_atTop hf)
/-- If when `x` tends to `∞`, `f x / g x` tends to a positive constant, then `f` tends to `∞` if
and only if `g` tends to `∞`. -/
theorem Tendsto.num_atTop_iff_den_atTop {α K : Type*}
[Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K] [TopologicalSpace K]
[OrderTopology K] [ContinuousInv K] {f g : α → K} {l : Filter α} {a : K} (ha : 0 < a)
(hlim : Tendsto (fun x => f x / g x) l (𝓝 a)) :
Tendsto f l atTop ↔ Tendsto g l atTop :=
⟨fun hf ↦ Tendsto.den hf ha hlim, fun hg ↦ Tendsto.num hg ha hlim⟩
/-! ### Powers -/
theorem tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos
[Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 0 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ (r + 1) ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tendsto_atTop_atTop_of_monotone' (pow_right_mono₀ <| le_add_of_nonneg_left h.le) <|
not_bddAbove_iff.2 fun _ ↦ Set.exists_range_iff.2 <| add_one_pow_unbounded_of_pos _ h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
[Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [Archimedean α] {r : α}
(h : 1 < r) : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop atTop :=
sub_add_cancel r 1 ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (sub_pos.2 h)
theorem Nat.tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt {m : ℕ} (h : 1 < m) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ m ^ n) atTop atTop :=
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (le_of_lt h) ▸ tendsto_add_one_pow_atTop_atTop_of_pos (tsub_pos_of_lt h)
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
h₁.eq_or_lt.elim
(fun hr ↦ (tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat 1).mp <| by
simp [_root_.pow_succ, ← hr, tendsto_const_nhds])
(fun hr ↦
have := (one_lt_inv₀ hr).2 h₂ |> tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt
(tendsto_inv_atTop_zero.comp this).congr fun n ↦ by simp)
@[simp] theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜] [Archimedean 𝕜]
[TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ |r| < 1 := by
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_abs_tendsto_zero]
refine ⟨fun h ↦ by_contra (fun hr_le ↦ ?_), fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· by_cases hr : 1 = |r|
· replace h : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ |r|^n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by simpa only [← abs_pow, h]
simp only [hr.symm, one_pow] at h
exact zero_ne_one <| tendsto_nhds_unique h tendsto_const_nhds
· apply @not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop 𝕜 ℕ _ _ _ _ atTop _ (fun n ↦ |r| ^ n) _ 0 _
· refine (pow_right_strictMono₀ <| lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le)
hr).monotone.tendsto_atTop_atTop (fun b ↦ ?_)
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := (pow_unbounded_of_one_lt b (lt_of_le_of_ne (le_of_not_lt hr_le) hr))
exact ⟨n, le_of_lt hn⟩
· simpa only [← abs_pow]
· simpa only [← abs_pow] using (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one (abs_nonneg r)) h
theorem tendsto_pow_atTop_nhdsWithin_zero_of_lt_one {𝕜 : Type*}
[Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
[Archimedean 𝕜] [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [OrderTopology 𝕜] {r : 𝕜} (h₁ : 0 < r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝[>] 0) :=
tendsto_inf.2
⟨tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁.le h₂,
tendsto_principal.2 <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ pow_pos h₁ _⟩
theorem uniformity_basis_dist_pow_of_lt_one {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {r : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < r)
(h₁ : r < 1) :
(uniformity α).HasBasis (fun _ : ℕ ↦ True) fun k ↦ { p : α × α | dist p.1 p.2 < r ^ k } :=
Metric.mk_uniformity_basis (fun _ _ ↦ pow_pos h₀ _) fun _ ε0 ↦
(exists_pow_lt_of_lt_one ε0 h₁).imp fun _ hk ↦ ⟨trivial, hk.le⟩
theorem geom_lt {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, c * u k < u (k + 1)) : c ^ n * u 0 < u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_le_of_lt hn _ _ h
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem geom_le {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, c * u k ≤ u (k + 1)) :
c ^ n * u 0 ≤ u n := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ _ h <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem lt_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n)
(h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) < c * u k) : u n < c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_pos_lt_seq_of_lt_of_le hn _ h _
· simp
· simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
theorem le_geom {u : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (h : ∀ k < n, u (k + 1) ≤ c * u k) :
u n ≤ c ^ n * u 0 := by
apply (monotone_mul_left_of_nonneg hc).seq_le_seq n _ h _ <;>
simp [_root_.pow_succ', mul_assoc, le_refl]
/-- If a sequence `v` of real numbers satisfies `k * v n ≤ v (n+1)` with `1 < k`,
then it goes to +∞. -/
theorem tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le {v : ℕ → ℝ} {c : ℝ} (h₀ : 0 < v 0) (hc : 1 < c)
(hu : ∀ n, c * v n ≤ v (n + 1)) : Tendsto v atTop atTop :=
(tendsto_atTop_mono fun n ↦ geom_le (zero_le_one.trans hc.le) n fun k _ ↦ hu k) <|
(tendsto_pow_atTop_atTop_of_one_lt hc).atTop_mul_const h₀
theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
NNReal.tendsto_coe.1 <| by
simp only [NNReal.coe_pow, NNReal.coe_zero,
_root_.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr]
@[simp]
protected theorem NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa [coe_pow, coe_zero, abs_eq, coe_lt_one, val_eq_coe] using
tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp <| tendsto_coe.mpr h, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one {r : ℝ≥0∞} (hr : r < 1) :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero]
norm_cast at *
apply NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n : ℕ => r ^ n) atTop (𝓝 0) ↔ r < 1 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one⟩
lift r to NNReal
· refine fun hr ↦ top_ne_zero (tendsto_nhds_unique (EventuallyEq.tendsto ?_) (hr ▸ h))
exact eventually_atTop.mpr ⟨1, fun _ hn ↦ pow_eq_top_iff.mpr ⟨rfl, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.mp hn⟩⟩
rw [← coe_zero] at h
norm_cast at h ⊢
exact NNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff.mp h
@[simp]
protected theorem ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_top_iff {r : ℝ≥0∞} :
Tendsto (fun n ↦ r^n) atTop (𝓝 ∞) ↔ 1 < r := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· contrapose!
intro r_le_one h_tends
specialize h_tends (Ioi_mem_nhds one_lt_top)
simp only [Filter.mem_map, mem_atTop_sets, ge_iff_le, Set.mem_preimage, Set.mem_Ioi] at h_tends
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := h_tends
exact lt_irrefl _ <| lt_of_lt_of_le (hn n le_rfl) <| pow_le_one₀ (zero_le _) r_le_one
· intro r_gt_one
have obs := @Tendsto.inv ℝ≥0∞ ℕ _ _ _ (fun n ↦ (r⁻¹)^n) atTop 0
simp only [ENNReal.tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_iff, inv_zero] at obs
simpa [← ENNReal.inv_pow] using obs <| ENNReal.inv_lt_one.mpr r_gt_one
lemma ENNReal.eq_zero_of_le_mul_pow {x r : ℝ≥0∞} {ε : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1)
(h : ∀ n : ℕ, x ≤ ε * r ^ n) : x = 0 := by
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine ge_of_tendsto' (f := fun (n : ℕ) ↦ ε * r ^ n) (x := atTop) ?_ h
rw [← mul_zero (M₀ := ℝ≥0∞) (a := ε)]
exact Tendsto.const_mul (tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one hr) (Or.inr coe_ne_top)
/-! ### Geometric series -/
section Geometric
theorem hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
have : r ≠ 1 := ne_of_lt h₂
have : Tendsto (fun n ↦ (r ^ n - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹) atTop (𝓝 ((0 - 1) * (r - 1)⁻¹)) :=
((tendsto_pow_atTop_nhds_zero_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).sub tendsto_const_nhds).mul tendsto_const_nhds
(hasSum_iff_tendsto_nat_of_nonneg (pow_nonneg h₁) _).mpr <| by
simp_all [neg_inv, geom_sum_eq, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem summable_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) :
Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_of_lt_one {r : ℝ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ r) (h₂ : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one h₁ h₂).tsum_eq
theorem hasSum_geometric_two : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) 2 := by
convert hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one _ _ <;> norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n :=
⟨_, hasSum_geometric_two⟩
theorem summable_geometric_two_encode {ι : Type*} [Encodable ι] :
Summable fun i : ι ↦ (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ Encodable.encode i :=
summable_geometric_two.comp_injective Encodable.encode_injective
theorem tsum_geometric_two : (∑' n : ℕ, ((1 : ℝ) / 2) ^ n) = 2 :=
hasSum_geometric_two.tsum_eq
theorem sum_geometric_two_le (n : ℕ) : (∑ i ∈ range n, (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i) ≤ 2 := by
have : ∀ i, 0 ≤ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) ^ i := by
intro i
apply pow_nonneg
norm_num
convert summable_geometric_two.sum_le_tsum (range n) (fun i _ ↦ this i)
exact tsum_geometric_two.symm
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two : (∑' n : ℕ, (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ n) = 2 :=
(inv_eq_one_div (2 : ℝ)).symm ▸ tsum_geometric_two
/-- The sum of `2⁻¹ ^ i` for `n ≤ i` equals `2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n`. -/
theorem tsum_geometric_inv_two_ge (n : ℕ) :
(∑' i, ite (n ≤ i) ((2 : ℝ)⁻¹ ^ i) 0) = 2 * 2⁻¹ ^ n := by
have A : Summable fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0 := by
simpa only [← piecewise_eq_indicator, one_div]
using summable_geometric_two.indicator {i | n ≤ i}
have B : ((Finset.range n).sum fun i : ℕ ↦ ite (n ≤ i) ((2⁻¹ : ℝ) ^ i) 0) = 0 :=
Finset.sum_eq_zero fun i hi ↦
ite_eq_right_iff.2 fun h ↦ (lt_irrefl _ ((Finset.mem_range.1 hi).trans_le h)).elim
simp only [← Summable.sum_add_tsum_nat_add n A, B, if_true, zero_add, zero_le',
le_add_iff_nonneg_left, pow_add, _root_.tsum_mul_right, tsum_geometric_inv_two]
theorem hasSum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n) a := by
convert HasSum.mul_left (a / 2)
(hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (le_of_lt one_half_pos) one_half_lt_one) using 1
· funext n
simp only [one_div, inv_pow]
rfl
· norm_num
theorem summable_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ a / 2 / 2 ^ n :=
⟨a, hasSum_geometric_two' a⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_two' (a : ℝ) : ∑' n : ℕ, a / 2 / 2 ^ n = a :=
(hasSum_geometric_two' a).tsum_eq
/-- **Sum of a Geometric Series** -/
theorem NNReal.hasSum_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : HasSum (fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n) (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
apply NNReal.hasSum_coe.1
push_cast
rw [NNReal.coe_sub (le_of_lt hr)]
exact hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one r.coe_nonneg hr
theorem NNReal.summable_geometric {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : Summable fun n : ℕ ↦ r ^ n :=
⟨_, NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr⟩
theorem tsum_geometric_nnreal {r : ℝ≥0} (hr : r < 1) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ :=
(NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr).tsum_eq
/-- The series `pow r` converges to `(1-r)⁻¹`. For `r < 1` the RHS is a finite number,
and for `1 ≤ r` the RHS equals `∞`. -/
@[simp]
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ n = (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
rcases lt_or_le r 1 with hr | hr
· rcases ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_coe.1 hr with ⟨r, rfl, hr'⟩
norm_cast at *
convert ENNReal.tsum_coe_eq (NNReal.hasSum_geometric hr)
rw [ENNReal.coe_inv <| ne_of_gt <| tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr, coe_sub, coe_one]
· rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr hr, ENNReal.inv_zero, ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_nat, iSup_eq_top]
refine fun a ha ↦
(ENNReal.exists_nat_gt (lt_top_iff_ne_top.1 ha)).imp fun n hn ↦ lt_of_lt_of_le hn ?_
calc
(n : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ range n, 1 := by rw [sum_const, nsmul_one, card_range]
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ range n, r ^ i := by gcongr; apply one_le_pow₀ hr
theorem ENNReal.tsum_geometric_add_one (r : ℝ≥0∞) : ∑' n : ℕ, r ^ (n + 1) = r * (1 - r)⁻¹ := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ', ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
end Geometric
/-!
### Sequences with geometrically decaying distance in metric spaces
In this paragraph, we discuss sequences in metric spaces or emetric spaces for which the distance
between two consecutive terms decays geometrically. We show that such sequences are Cauchy
sequences, and bound their distances to the limit. We also discuss series with geometrically
decaying terms.
-/
section EdistLeGeometric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (r C : ℝ≥0∞) (hr : r < 1) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C * r ^ n)
include hr hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, `C ≠ ∞`, `r < 1`,
then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric : CauchySeq f := by
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_of_tsum_ne_top _ hu ?_
rw [ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric]
refine ENNReal.mul_ne_top hC (ENNReal.inv_ne_top.2 ?_)
exact (tsub_pos_iff_lt.2 hr).ne'
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C * r^n / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) (n : ℕ) :
edist (f n) a ≤ C * r ^ n / (1 - r) := by
convert edist_le_tsum_of_edist_le_of_tendsto _ hu ha _
simp only [pow_add, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, ENNReal.tsum_geometric, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc]
include hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * r^n`, then the distance from
`f 0` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `C / (1 - r)`. -/
theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto₀ {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a)) :
edist (f 0) a ≤ C / (1 - r) := by
simpa only [_root_.pow_zero, mul_one] using edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_of_tendsto r C hu ha 0
end EdistLeGeometric
section EdistLeGeometricTwo
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] (C : ℝ≥0∞) (hC : C ≠ ⊤) {f : ℕ → α}
(hu : ∀ n, edist (f n) (f (n + 1)) ≤ C / 2 ^ n) {a : α} (ha : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 a))
include hC hu in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then `f` is a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric_two : CauchySeq f := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at hu
refine cauchySeq_of_edist_le_geometric 2⁻¹ C ?_ hC hu
simp [ENNReal.one_lt_two]
include hu ha in
/-- If `edist (f n) (f (n+1))` is bounded by `C * 2^-n`, then the distance from
`f n` to the limit of `f` is bounded above by `2 * C * 2^-n`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecificLimits/Basic.lean | 448 | 450 | theorem edist_le_of_edist_le_geometric_two_of_tendsto (n : ℕ) : edist (f n) a ≤ 2 * C / 2 ^ n := by | simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.inv_pow] at *
rw [mul_assoc, mul_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I = I := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq, ← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
classical
apply Associates.eq_of_eq_counts
· apply Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
· apply Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
intro v hv
obtain ⟨J, hJv⟩ := Associates.exists_rep v
rw [← hJv, Associates.irreducible_mk] at hv
rw [← hJv]
apply Ideal.finprod_count
⟨J, Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (irreducible_iff_prime.mp hv), Irreducible.ne_zero hv⟩ I hI
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, when both sides are regarded as fractional
ideals of `R`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)) = I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization hI]
rw [FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_finprod R⁰ K (le_refl _)]
simp_rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow,
zpow_natCast]
end Ideal
/-! ### Factorization of fractional ideals of Dedekind domains -/
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Int IsLocalization
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) = I := by
have hJ_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have hJ := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K hJ_ne_zero
have ha_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have ha := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K ha_ne_zero
rw [haJ, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← hJ, ← ha,
← finprod_inv_distrib]
simp_rw [← zpow_neg]
rw [← finprod_mul_distrib (Ideal.finite_mulSupport_coe hJ_ne_zero)
(Ideal.finite_mulSupport_inv ha_ne_zero)]
apply finprod_congr
intro v
rw [← zpow_add₀ ((@coeIdeal_ne_zero R _ K _ _ _ _).mpr v.ne_bot), sub_eq_add_neg]
open scoped Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction {n : R} (hn : n ≠ 0) (d : ↥R⁰) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑d : R)}) :
Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) := by
have hd_ne_zero : (algebraMap R K) (d : R) ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ (IsFractionRing.injective R K) d.property
have h0 : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) ≠ 0 := by
rw [spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨(map_ne_zero_iff (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K)).mpr hn, hd_ne_zero⟩
have hI : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) d)⁻¹ * ↑(Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R) := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
apply congr_arg
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
exact finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization h0 hI
open Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0)
(k : K) (hk : I = spanSingleton R⁰ k) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose
(mk'_surjective R⁰ k)} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑(choose
(choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)) : ↥R⁰) : R)}) : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = I := by
set n : R := choose (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)
set d : ↥R⁰ := choose (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hnd : mk' K n d = k := choose_spec (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
rw [← hnd, h, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, map_zero, zero_div, spanSingleton_zero] at hk
exact hI hk
rw [finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction hn0 d, hk, hnd]
variable (K)
open Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`,
then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we set `val_v(I) = 0`. -/
def count (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : ℤ :=
dite (I = 0) (fun _ : I = 0 => 0) fun _ : ¬I = 0 =>
let a := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
let J := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ)
/-- val_v(0) = 0. -/
lemma count_zero : count K v (0 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by simp only [count, dif_pos]
open Classical in
lemma count_ne_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk
(choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)))).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)})).factors : ℤ) := by
simp only [count, dif_neg hI]
open Classical in
/-- `val_v(I)` does not depend on the choice of `a` and `J` used to represent `I`. -/
theorem count_well_defined {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (h_aJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) := by
set a₁ := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
set J₁ := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
have h_a₁J₁ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁)⁻¹ * ↑J₁ :=
(choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).2
have h_a₁_ne_zero : a₁ ≠ 0 := (choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).1
have h_J₁_ne_zero : J₁ ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_a₁J₁
have h_a_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_J_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_a₁' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
have h_a' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
rw [ne_eq, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h_a_ne_zero
exact h_a_ne_zero
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by
exact Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
rw [h_a₁J₁, ← div_spanSingleton, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_div_iff h_a₁' h_a',
← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_mul, ← coeIdeal_mul] at h_aJ
rw [count, dif_neg hI, sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, ← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_add,
natCast_inj, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.mk_mul_mk, coeIdeal_injective h_aJ]
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_a_ne_zero
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. -/
theorem count_mul {I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hI' : I' ≠ 0) :
count K v (I * I') = count K v I + count K v I' := by
classical
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, haJ⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
have ha_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha
have hJ_ne_zero : Associates.mk J ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ)
obtain ⟨a', J', ha', haJ'⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I'
have ha'_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a'} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha'
have hJ'_ne_zero : Associates.mk J' ≠ 0 :=
Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI' haJ')
have h_prod : I * I' = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) (a * a'))⁻¹ * ↑(J * J') := by
rw [haJ, haJ', mul_assoc, mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K), mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, coeIdeal_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_inv,
mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)]
rw [count_well_defined K v hI haJ, count_well_defined K v hI' haJ',
count_well_defined K v (mul_ne_zero hI hI') h_prod, ← Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.count_mul hJ_ne_zero hJ'_ne_zero hv, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
← Associates.mk_mul_mk, Associates.count_mul ha_ne_zero ha'_ne_zero hv]
push_cast
ring
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. If `I` or `I'` is zero, then
`val_v(I*I') = 0`. -/
theorem count_mul' (I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) [Decidable (I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0)] :
count K v (I * I') = if I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0 then count K v I + count K v I' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_mul K v h.1 h.2
· push_neg at h
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
· rw [h hI, MulZeroClass.mul_zero, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
/-- val_v(1) = 0. -/
theorem count_one : count K v (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have h1 : (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑(1 : Ideal R) := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, coeIdeal_top, mul_one, inv_one,
spanSingleton_one]
rw [count_well_defined K v one_ne_zero h1, Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, sub_self]
theorem count_prod {ι} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) (hS : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0) :
count K v (∏ i ∈ s, I i) = ∑ i ∈ s, count K v (I i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi hrec
· rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty, count_one]
· have hS' : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := fun j hj => hS j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
have hS0 : ∏ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr hS'
have hi0 : I i ≠ 0 := hS i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, Finset.sum_insert hi, count_mul K v hi0 hS0, hrec hS']
/-- For every `n ∈ ℕ` and every ideal `I`, `val_v(I^n) = n*val_v(I)`. -/
theorem count_pow (n : ℕ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
induction' n with n h
· rw [pow_zero, ofNat_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count_one]
· classical rw [pow_succ, count_mul']
by_cases hI : I = 0
· have h_neg : ¬(I ^ n ≠ 0 ∧ I ≠ 0) := by
rw [not_and', not_not, ne_eq]
intro h
exact absurd hI h
rw [if_neg h_neg, hI, count_zero, MulZeroClass.mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (And.intro (pow_ne_zero n hI) hI), h, Nat.cast_add,
Nat.cast_one]
ring
/-- `val_v(v) = 1`, when `v` is regarded as a fractional ideal. -/
theorem count_self : count K v (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 := by
have hv : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr v.ne_bot
have h_self : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑v.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hv_irred : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
classical rw [count_well_defined K v hv h_self, Associates.count_self hv_irred,
Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero hv_irred, ofNat_zero, sub_zero, ofNat_one]
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℕ`. -/
theorem count_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_pow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- `val_v(I⁻ⁿ) = -val_v(Iⁿ)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_neg_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ (-n)) = - count K v (I ^ n) := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, neg_zero, zpow_zero, count_one, neg_zero]
· rw [hI, zero_zpow n hn, zero_zpow (-n) (neg_ne_zero.mpr hn), count_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← count_mul K v (zpow_ne_zero _ hI) (zpow_ne_zero _ hI),
← zpow_add₀ hI, neg_add_cancel, zpow_zero]
exact count_one K v
theorem count_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I⁻¹) = - count K v I := by
rw [← zpow_neg_one, count_neg_zpow K v (1 : ℤ) I, zpow_one]
/-- `val_v(Iⁿ) = n*val_v(I)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
obtain n | n := n
· rw [ofNat_eq_coe, zpow_natCast]
exact count_pow K v n I
· rw [negSucc_eq, count_neg_zpow, ← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast, count_pow]
ring
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 441 | 457 | theorem count_zpow_self (n : ℤ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by | rw [count_zpow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- If `v ≠ w` are two maximal ideals of `R`, then `val_v(w) = 0`. -/
theorem count_maximal_coprime {w : HeightOneSpectrum R} (hw : w ≠ v) :
count K v (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have hw_fact : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑w.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hw_ne_zero : (w.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 :=
coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr w.ne_bot
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
have hw' : Irreducible (Associates.mk w.asIdeal) := by apply w.associates_irreducible
classical
rw [count_well_defined K v hw_ne_zero hw_fact, Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top,
Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one, Associates.count_zero hv, ofNat_zero, sub_zero, |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Between
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Affine.Isometry
/-!
# Angles between points
This file defines unoriented angles in Euclidean affine spaces.
## Main definitions
* `EuclideanGeometry.angle`, with notation `∠`, is the undirected angle determined by three
points.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real RealInnerProductSpace
namespace EuclideanGeometry
open InnerProductGeometry
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] {p p₀ : P}
/-- The undirected angle at `p₂` between the line segments to `p₁` and
`p₃`. If either of those points equals `p₂`, this is π/2. Use
`open scoped EuclideanGeometry` to access the `∠ p₁ p₂ p₃`
notation. -/
nonrec def angle (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ℝ :=
angle (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ : V) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂)
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "∠" => EuclideanGeometry.angle
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : P × P × P} (hx12 : x.1 ≠ x.2.1) (hx32 : x.2.2 ≠ x.2.1) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : P × P × P => ∠ y.1 y.2.1 y.2.2) x := by
let f : P × P × P → V × V := fun y => (y.1 -ᵥ y.2.1, y.2.2 -ᵥ y.2.1)
have hf1 : (f x).1 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx12]
have hf2 : (f x).2 ≠ 0 := by simp [f, hx32]
exact (InnerProductGeometry.continuousAt_angle hf1 hf2).comp (by fun_prop)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.AffineIsometry.angle_map {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V₂]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ V₂] [MetricSpace P₂] [NormedAddTorsor V₂ P₂]
(f : P →ᵃⁱ[ℝ] P₂) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (f p₁) (f p₂) (f p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
simp_rw [angle, ← AffineIsometry.map_vsub, LinearIsometry.angle_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.AffineSubspace.angle_coe {s : AffineSubspace ℝ P} (p₁ p₂ p₃ : s) :
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
∠ (p₁ : P) (p₂ : P) (p₃ : P) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
haveI : Nonempty s := ⟨p₁⟩
s.subtypeₐᵢ.angle_map p₁ p₂ p₃
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vadd (v : V) (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (v +ᵥ p₁) (v +ᵥ p₂) (v +ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVAdd ℝ P v).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vadd_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (p : P) : ∠ (v₁ +ᵥ p) (v₂ +ᵥ p) (v₃ +ᵥ p) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_vsub (p p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ (p -ᵥ p₁) (p -ᵥ p₂) (p -ᵥ p₃) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.constVSub ℝ p).toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_vsub_const (p₁ p₂ p₃ p : P) : ∠ (p₁ -ᵥ p) (p₂ -ᵥ p) (p₃ -ᵥ p) = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
(AffineIsometryEquiv.vaddConst ℝ p).symm.toAffineIsometry.angle_map _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_add_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ + v) (v₂ + v) (v₃ + v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_vadd_const _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_add (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v + v₁) (v + v₂) (v + v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ :=
angle_const_vadd _ _ _ _
/-- Angles in a vector space are translation invariant -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_sub_const (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) (v : V) : ∠ (v₁ - v) (v₂ - v) (v₃ - v) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_vsub_const v₁ v₂ v₃ v
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_const_sub (v : V) (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (v - v₁) (v - v₂) (v - v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [vsub_eq_sub] using angle_const_vsub v v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- Angles in a vector space are invariant to inversion -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg (v₁ v₂ v₃ : V) : ∠ (-v₁) (-v₂) (-v₃) = ∠ v₁ v₂ v₃ := by
simpa only [zero_sub] using angle_const_sub 0 v₁ v₂ v₃
/-- The angle at a point does not depend on the order of the other two
points. -/
nonrec theorem angle_comm (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ :=
angle_comm _ _
/-- The angle at a point is nonnegative. -/
nonrec theorem angle_nonneg (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : 0 ≤ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ :=
angle_nonneg _ _
/-- The angle at a point is at most π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_le_pi (p₁ p₂ p₃ : P) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ ≤ π :=
angle_le_pi _ _
/-- The angle ∠AAB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_left (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p₀ p₀ p = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [vsub_self]
exact angle_zero_left _
/-- The angle ∠ABB at a point is always `π / 2`. -/
@[simp] lemma angle_self_right (p₀ p : P) : ∠ p p₀ p₀ = π / 2 := by rw [angle_comm, angle_self_left]
/-- The angle ∠ABA at a point is `0`, unless `A = B`. -/
theorem angle_self_of_ne (h : p ≠ p₀) : ∠ p p₀ p = 0 := angle_self <| vsub_ne_zero.2 h
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BAC is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : ∠ p₂ p₁ p₃ = 0 := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_eq_pi_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨hp₁p₂, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
unfold angle
rw [angle_eq_zero_iff]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, neg_ne_zero] at hp₁p₂
use hp₁p₂, -r + 1, add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂, smul_neg]
simp [← hpr]
/-- If the angle ∠ABC at a point is π, the angle ∠BCA is 0. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_right {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
∠ p₂ p₃ p₁ = 0 := by
rw [angle_comm] at h
exact angle_eq_zero_of_angle_eq_pi_left h
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ABC = ∠ABD. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = ∠ p₁ p₂ p₄ := by
unfold angle at *
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, hpr⟩⟩⟩
rw [eq_comm]
convert angle_smul_right_of_pos (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) (p₃ -ᵥ p₂) (add_pos (neg_pos_of_neg hr) zero_lt_one)
rw [add_smul, ← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₂ p₃, smul_neg, neg_smul, ← hpr]
simp
/-- If ∠BCD = π, then ∠ACB + ∠ACD = π. -/
nonrec theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi (p₁ : P) {p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (h : ∠ p₂ p₃ p₄ = π) :
∠ p₁ p₃ p₂ + ∠ p₁ p₃ p₄ = π := by
unfold angle at h
rw [angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₂, angle_comm p₁ p₃ p₄]
unfold angle
exact angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi _ h
/-- **Vertical Angles Theorem**: angles opposite each other, formed by two intersecting straight
lines, are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_angle_of_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ p₅ : P} (hapc : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₃ = π)
(hbpd : ∠ p₂ p₅ p₄ = π) : ∠ p₁ p₅ p₂ = ∠ p₃ p₅ p₄ := by
linarith [angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₁ hbpd, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₁,
angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi p₄ hapc, angle_comm p₄ p₅ p₃]
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist A B ≠ 0. -/
theorem left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₁ p₂ ≠ 0 := by
by_contra heq
rw [dist_eq_zero] at heq
rw [heq, angle_self_left] at h
exact Real.pi_ne_zero (by linarith)
/-- If ∠ABC = π then dist C B ≠ 0. -/
theorem right_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) : dist p₃ p₂ ≠ 0 :=
left_dist_ne_zero_of_angle_eq_pi <| (angle_comm _ _ _).trans h
/-- If ∠ABC = π, then (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_of_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = π if and only if (dist A C) = (dist A B) + (dist B C). -/
theorem dist_eq_add_dist_iff_angle_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = dist p₁ p₂ + dist p₃ p₂ ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)) fun he =>
hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If ∠ABC = 0, then (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_of_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h
/-- If A ≠ B and C ≠ B then ∠ABC = 0 if and only if (dist A C) = abs ((dist A B) - (dist B C)). -/
theorem dist_eq_abs_sub_dist_iff_angle_eq_zero {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₃p₂ : p₃ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₃ = |dist p₁ p₂ - dist p₃ p₂| ↔ ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = 0 := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, dist_eq_norm_vsub V, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
exact
norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero (fun he => hp₁p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he))
fun he => hp₃p₂ (vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq.1 he)
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB, then ∠AMB = π. -/
theorem angle_midpoint_eq_pi (p₁ p₂ : P) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) : ∠ p₁ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π := by
simp only [angle, left_vsub_midpoint, invOf_eq_inv, right_vsub_midpoint, inv_pos, zero_lt_two,
angle_smul_right_of_pos, angle_smul_left_of_pos]
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev p₁ p₂]
apply angle_self_neg_of_nonzero
simpa only [ne_eq, vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq]
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMA = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₁ = π / 2 := by
let m : P := midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂
have h1 : p₃ -ᵥ p₁ = p₃ -ᵥ m - (p₁ -ᵥ m) := (vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₃ p₁ m).symm
have h2 : p₃ -ᵥ p₂ = p₃ -ᵥ m + (p₁ -ᵥ m) := by
rw [left_vsub_midpoint, ← midpoint_vsub_right, vsub_add_vsub_cancel]
rw [dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₁, dist_eq_norm_vsub V p₃ p₂, h1, h2] at h
exact (norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (p₃ -ᵥ m) (p₁ -ᵥ m)).mp h.symm
/-- If M is the midpoint of the segment AB and C is the same distance from A as it is from B
then ∠CMB = π / 2. -/
theorem angle_right_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : dist p₃ p₁ = dist p₃ p₂) :
∠ p₃ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) p₂ = π / 2 := by
rw [midpoint_comm p₁ p₂, angle_left_midpoint_eq_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq h.symm]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at that point
is π. -/
theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff]
rcases h with ⟨⟨r, ⟨hr0, hr1⟩, hp₂⟩, hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃⟩
refine ⟨vsub_ne_zero.2 hp₂p₁.symm, -(1 - r) / r, ?_⟩
have hr0' : r ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₁
simp at hp₂p₁
have hr1' : r ≠ 1 := by
rintro rfl
rw [← hp₂] at hp₂p₃
simp at hp₂p₃
replace hr0 := hr0.lt_of_ne hr0'.symm
replace hr1 := hr1.lt_of_ne hr1'
refine ⟨div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (Left.neg_neg_iff.2 (sub_pos.2 hr1)) hr0, ?_⟩
rw [← hp₂, AffineMap.lineMap_apply, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, vsub_self,
zero_sub, smul_neg, smul_smul, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hr0', neg_smul, neg_neg, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ←
add_smul, sub_add_cancel, one_smul]
/-- If the second of three points is strictly between the other two, the angle at that point
(reversed) is π. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Affine.lean | 268 | 275 | theorem _root_.Sbtw.angle₃₂₁_eq_pi {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (h : Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃) : ∠ p₃ p₂ p₁ = π := by | rw [← h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi, angle_comm]
/-- The angle between three points is π if and only if the second point is strictly between the
other two. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff_sbtw {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} : ∠ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π ↔ Sbtw ℝ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => h.angle₁₂₃_eq_pi⟩
rw [angle, angle_eq_pi_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
/-!
# Bicategories
In this file we define typeclass for bicategories.
A bicategory `B` consists of
* objects `a : B`,
* 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`, and
* 2-morphisms `η : f ⟶ g` between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`.
We use `u`, `v`, and `w` as the universe variables for objects, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms,
respectively.
A typeclass for bicategories extends `CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct` typeclass. This means that
we have
* a composition `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c` for each 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c`, and
* an identity `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a` for each object `a : B`.
For each object `a b : B`, the collection of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` has a category structure. The
2-morphisms in the bicategory are implemented as the morphisms in this family of categories.
The composition of 1-morphisms is in fact an object part of a functor
`(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. The definition of bicategories in this file does not
require this functor directly. Instead, it requires the whiskering functions. For a 1-morphism
`f : a ⟶ b` and a 2-morphism `η : g ⟶ h` between 1-morphisms `g h : b ⟶ c`, there is a
2-morphism `whiskerLeft f η : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h`. Similarly, for a 2-morphism `η : f ⟶ g`
between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` and a 1-morphism `f : b ⟶ c`, there is a 2-morphism
`whiskerRight η h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h`. These satisfy the exchange law
`whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ`,
which is required as an axiom in the definition here.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- In a bicategory, we can compose the 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c` to obtain
a 1-morphism `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c`. This composition does not need to be strictly associative,
but there is a specified associator, `α_ f g h : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ (g ≫ h)`.
There is an identity 1-morphism `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a`, with specified left and right unitor
isomorphisms `λ_ f : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` and `ρ_ f : f ≫ 𝟙 a ≅ f`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bicategory.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
/-- The category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms -/
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
/-- Left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
/-- Right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
/-- The associator isomorphism: `(f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h` -/
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` -/
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
/-- The right unitor: `f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f` -/
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
namespace Bicategory
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
/-!
### Simp-normal form for 2-morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any 2-morphisms into simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is also useful when applying (forthcoming)
`coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of 2-morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of 2-morphisms like `η₁ ≫ η₂ ≫ η₃ ≫ η₄ ≫ η₅` such that each `ηᵢ` is
either a structural 2-morphisms (2-morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural 2-morphisms, and
2. each non-structural 2-morphism in the composition is of the form `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅`,
where each `fᵢ` is a 1-morphism that is not the identity or a composite and `η` is a
non-structural 2-morphisms that is also not the identity or a composite.
Note that `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅` is actually `f₁ ◁ (f₂ ◁ (f₃ ◁ ((η ▷ f₄) ▷ f₅)))`.
-/
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
/-
The following simp attributes are put in order to rewrite any 2-morphisms into normal forms. There
are associators and unitors in the RHS in the several simp lemmas here (e.g. `id_whiskerLeft`),
which at first glance look more complicated than the LHS, but they will be eventually reduced by
the pentagon or the triangle identities, and more generally, (forthcoming) `coherence` tactic.
-/
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 201 | 202 | theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Bound
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Equitabilise
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Regularity.Uniform
/-!
# Chunk of the increment partition for Szemerédi Regularity Lemma
In the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma, we need to partition each part of a starting partition
to increase the energy. This file defines those partitions of parts and shows that they locally
increase the energy.
This entire file is internal to the proof of Szemerédi Regularity Lemma.
## Main declarations
* `SzemerediRegularity.chunk`: The partition of a part of the starting partition.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_uniform`: `chunk` does not locally decrease the edge
density between uniform parts too much.
* `SzemerediRegularity.edgeDensity_chunk_not_uniform`: `chunk` locally increases the edge density
between non-uniform parts.
## TODO
Once ported to mathlib4, this file will be a great golfing ground for Heather's new tactic
`gcongr`.
## References
[Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta, *Formalising Szemerédi’s Regularity Lemma in Lean*][srl_itp]
-/
open Finpartition Finset Fintype Rel Nat
open scoped SzemerediRegularity.Positivity
namespace SzemerediRegularity
variable {α : Type*} [Fintype α] [DecidableEq α] {P : Finpartition (univ : Finset α)}
(hP : P.IsEquipartition) (G : SimpleGraph α) [DecidableRel G.Adj] (ε : ℝ) {U : Finset α}
(hU : U ∈ P.parts) (V : Finset α)
local notation3 "m" => (card α / stepBound #P.parts : ℕ)
/-!
### Definitions
We define `chunk`, the partition of a part, and `star`, the sets of parts of `chunk` that are
contained in the corresponding witness of non-uniformity.
-/
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.increment` which partitions `U`. -/
noncomputable def chunk : Finpartition U :=
if hUcard : #U = m * 4 ^ #P.parts + (card α / #P.parts - m * 4 ^ #P.parts) then
(atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₁ hUcard
else (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).equitabilise <| card_aux₂ hP hU hUcard
-- `hP` and `hU` are used to get that `U` has size
-- `m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a or m * 4 ^ #P.parts + a + 1`
/-- The portion of `SzemerediRegularity.chunk` which is contained in the witness of non-uniformity
of `U` and `V`. -/
noncomputable def star (V : Finset α) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V}
/-!
### Density estimates
We estimate the density between parts of `chunk`.
-/
theorem biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness :
(star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V :=
biUnion_subset_iff_forall_subset.2 fun _ hA => (mem_filter.1 hA).2
variable {hP G ε hU V} {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α}
theorem star_subset_chunk : star hP G ε hU V ⊆ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts :=
filter_subset _ _
private theorem card_nonuniformWitness_sdiff_biUnion_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts) (hUV : U ≠ V)
(h₂ : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) :
#(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) ≤ 2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * m := by
have hX : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∈ P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U :=
nonuniformWitness_mem_nonuniformWitnesses h₂ hV hUV
have q : G.nonuniformWitness ε U V \ (star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id ⊆
{B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts |
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty}.biUnion
fun B => B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id := by
intro x hx
rw [← biUnion_filter_atomise hX (G.nonuniformWitness_subset h₂), star, mem_sdiff,
mem_biUnion] at hx
simp only [not_exists, mem_biUnion, and_imp, exists_prop, mem_filter,
not_and, mem_sdiff, id, mem_sdiff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨⟨B, hB₁, hB₂⟩, hx⟩ := hx
exact ⟨B, hB₁, hB₂, fun A hA AB => hx A hA <| AB.trans hB₁.2.1⟩
apply (card_le_card q).trans (card_biUnion_le.trans _)
trans ∑ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts with
B ⊆ G.nonuniformWitness ε U V ∧ B.Nonempty, m
· suffices ∀ B ∈ (atomise U <| P.nonuniformWitnesses G ε U).parts,
#(B \ {A ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts | A ⊆ B}.biUnion id) ≤ m by
exact sum_le_sum fun B hB => this B <| filter_subset _ _ hB
intro B hB
unfold chunk
split_ifs with h₁
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₁ h₁) hB
· convert card_parts_equitabilise_subset_le _ (card_aux₂ hP hU h₁) hB
rw [sum_const]
refine mul_le_mul_right' ?_ _
have t := card_filter_atomise_le_two_pow (s := U) hX
refine t.trans (pow_right_mono₀ (by norm_num) <| tsub_le_tsub_right ?_ _)
exact card_image_le.trans (card_le_card <| filter_subset _ _)
private theorem one_sub_eps_mul_card_nonuniformWitness_le_card_star (hV : V ∈ P.parts)
(hUV : U ≠ V) (hunif : ¬G.IsUniform ε U V) (hPε : ↑100 ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5)
(hε₁ : ε ≤ 1) :
(1 - ε / 10) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) ≤ #((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) := by
have hP₁ : 0 < #P.parts := Finset.card_pos.2 ⟨_, hU⟩
have : (↑2 ^ #P.parts : ℝ) * m / (#U * ε) ≤ ε / 10 := by
rw [← div_div, div_le_iff₀']
swap
· sz_positivity
refine le_of_mul_le_mul_left ?_ (pow_pos zero_lt_two #P.parts)
calc
↑2 ^ #P.parts * ((↑2 ^ #P.parts * m : ℝ) / #U) =
((2 : ℝ) * 2) ^ #P.parts * m / #U := by
rw [mul_pow, ← mul_div_assoc, mul_assoc]
_ = ↑4 ^ #P.parts * m / #U := by norm_num
_ ≤ 1 := div_le_one_of_le₀ (pow_mul_m_le_card_part hP hU) (cast_nonneg _)
_ ≤ ↑2 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 2 / 10 := by
refine (one_le_sq_iff₀ <| by positivity).1 ?_
rw [div_pow, mul_pow, pow_right_comm, ← pow_mul ε,
one_le_div (sq_pos_of_ne_zero <| by norm_num)]
calc
(↑10 ^ 2) = 100 := by norm_num
_ ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 5 := hPε
_ ≤ ↑4 ^ #P.parts * ε ^ 4 :=
(mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (pow_le_pow_of_le_one (by sz_positivity) hε₁ <| le_succ _)
(by positivity))
_ = (↑2 ^ 2) ^ #P.parts * ε ^ (2 * 2) := by norm_num
_ = ↑2 ^ #P.parts * (ε * (ε / 10)) := by rw [mul_div_assoc, sq, mul_div_assoc]
calc
(↑1 - ε / 10) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) ≤
(↑1 - ↑2 ^ #P.parts * m / (#U * ε)) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) :=
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (sub_le_sub_left this _) (cast_nonneg _)
_ = #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) -
↑2 ^ #P.parts * m / (#U * ε) * #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) := by
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
_ ≤ #(G.nonuniformWitness ε U V) - ↑2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * m := by
refine sub_le_sub_left ?_ _
have : (2 : ℝ) ^ #P.parts = ↑2 ^ (#P.parts - 1) * 2 := by
rw [← _root_.pow_succ, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (succ_le_iff.2 hP₁)]
rw [← mul_div_right_comm, this, mul_right_comm _ (2 : ℝ), mul_assoc, le_div_iff₀]
· refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (by positivity)
exact (G.le_card_nonuniformWitness hunif).trans
(le_mul_of_one_le_left (cast_nonneg _) one_le_two)
have := Finset.card_pos.mpr (P.nonempty_of_mem_parts hU)
sz_positivity
_ ≤ #((star hP G ε hU V).biUnion id) := by
rw [sub_le_comm, ←
cast_sub (card_le_card <| biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness hP G ε hU V), ←
card_sdiff (biUnion_star_subset_nonuniformWitness hP G ε hU V)]
exact mod_cast card_nonuniformWitness_sdiff_biUnion_star hV hUV hunif
/-! ### `chunk` -/
theorem card_chunk (hm : m ≠ 0) : #(chunk hP G ε hU).parts = 4 ^ #P.parts := by
unfold chunk
split_ifs
· rw [card_parts_equitabilise _ _ hm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le]
exact le_of_lt a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card
· rw [card_parts_equitabilise _ _ hm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le a_add_one_le_four_pow_parts_card]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Regularity/Chunk.lean | 180 | 185 | theorem card_eq_of_mem_parts_chunk (hs : s ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) :
#s = m ∨ #s = m + 1 := by | unfold chunk at hs
split_ifs at hs <;> exact card_eq_of_mem_parts_equitabilise hs
theorem m_le_card_of_mem_chunk_parts (hs : s ∈ (chunk hP G ε hU).parts) : m ≤ #s := |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddTorsor
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Inversion in an affine space
In this file we define inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to
the point `y` such that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center
and the radius the sphere.
In many applications, it is convenient to assume that the inversions swaps the center and the point
at infinity. In order to stay in the original affine space, we define the map so that it sends
center to itself.
Currently, we prove only a few basic lemmas needed to prove Ptolemy's inequality, see
`EuclideanGeometry.mul_dist_le_mul_dist_add_mul_dist`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Metric Function AffineMap Set AffineSubspace
open scoped Topology
variable {V P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P]
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {c x y : P} {R : ℝ}
/-- Inversion in a sphere in an affine space. This map sends each point `x` to the point `y` such
that `y -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c)`, where `c` and `R` are the center and the radius the
sphere. -/
def inversion (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) : P :=
(R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c
theorem inversion_def :
inversion = fun (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) => (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) +ᵥ c :=
rfl
/-!
### Basic properties
In this section we prove that `EuclideanGeometry.inversion c R` is involutive and preserves the
sphere `Metric.sphere c R`. We also prove that the distance to the center of the image of `x` under
this inversion is given by `R ^ 2 / dist x c`.
-/
theorem inversion_eq_lineMap (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x = lineMap c x ((R / dist x c) ^ 2) :=
rfl
theorem inversion_vsub_center (c : P) (R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c R x -ᵥ c = (R / dist x c) ^ 2 • (x -ᵥ c) :=
vadd_vsub _ _
@[simp]
theorem inversion_self (c : P) (R : ℝ) : inversion c R c = c := by simp [inversion]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_zero_radius (c x : P) : inversion c 0 x = c := by simp [inversion]
theorem inversion_mul (c : P) (a R : ℝ) (x : P) :
inversion c (a * R) x = homothety c (a ^ 2) (inversion c R x) := by
simp only [inversion_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_eq_lineMap, ← homothety_mul_apply, mul_div_assoc,
mul_pow]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center (c x : P) : inversion c (dist x c) x = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hne)
· apply inversion_self
· rw [inversion, div_self, one_pow, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
rwa [dist_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem inversion_dist_center' (c x : P) : inversion c (dist c x) x = x := by
rw [dist_comm, inversion_dist_center]
theorem inversion_of_mem_sphere (h : x ∈ Metric.sphere c R) : inversion c R x = x :=
h.out ▸ inversion_dist_center c x
/-- Distance from the image of a point under inversion to the center. This formula accidentally
works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_inversion_center (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist (inversion c R x) c = R ^ 2 / dist x c := by
rcases eq_or_ne x c with (rfl | hx)
· simp
have : dist x c ≠ 0 := dist_ne_zero.2 hx
-- was `field_simp [inversion, norm_smul, abs_div, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, sq, mul_assoc]`,
-- but really slow. Replaced by `simp only ...` to speed up.
-- TODO(https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/15486): reinstate `field_simp` once it is faster.
simp (disch := field_simp_discharge) only [inversion, sq, mul_div_assoc', div_mul_eq_mul_div,
div_div, dist_vadd_left, norm_smul, norm_div, norm_mul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_mul_abs_self,
abs_dist, ← dist_eq_norm_vsub, mul_assoc, eq_div_iff, div_eq_iff]
/-- Distance from the center of an inversion to the image of a point under the inversion. This
formula accidentally works for `x = c`. -/
theorem dist_center_inversion (c x : P) (R : ℝ) : dist c (inversion c R x) = R ^ 2 / dist c x := by
rw [dist_comm c, dist_comm c, dist_inversion_center]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Inversion/Basic.lean | 107 | 108 | theorem inversion_inversion (c : P) {R : ℝ} (hR : R ≠ 0) (x : P) :
inversion c R (inversion c R x) = x := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntegrableOn
/-!
# Locally integrable functions
A function is called *locally integrable* (`MeasureTheory.LocallyIntegrable`) if it is integrable
on a neighborhood of every point. More generally, it is *locally integrable on `s`* if it is
locally integrable on a neighbourhood within `s` of any point of `s`.
This file contains properties of locally integrable functions, and integrability results
on compact sets.
## Main statements
* `Continuous.locallyIntegrable`: A continuous function is locally integrable.
* `ContinuousOn.locallyIntegrableOn`: A function which is continuous on `s` is locally
integrable on `s`.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Set Function TopologicalSpace Bornology
open scoped Topology Interval ENNReal
variable {X Y E F R : Type*} [MeasurableSpace X] [TopologicalSpace X]
variable [MeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace Y]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] {f g : X → E} {μ : Measure X} {s : Set X}
namespace MeasureTheory
section LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable on s*, for `s ⊆ X`, if for every `x ∈ s` there is
a neighbourhood of `x` within `s` on which `f` is integrable. (Note this is, in general, strictly
weaker than local integrability with respect to `μ.restrict s`.) -/
def LocallyIntegrableOn (f : X → E) (s : Set X) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, x ∈ s → IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono_set (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f t μ := fun x hx =>
(hf x <| hst hx).filter_mono (nhdsWithin_mono x hst)
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.norm (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (fun x => ‖f x‖) s μ := fun t ht =>
let ⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int⟩ := hf t ht
⟨U, hU_nhd, hU_int.norm⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ := by
intro x hx
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, t_mem, ht⟩
exact ⟨t, t_mem, Integrable.mono ht hg.restrict (ae_restrict_of_ae h)⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ :=
fun _ _ => ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf⟩
/-- If a function is locally integrable on a compact set, then it is integrable on that set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ)
(hs : IsCompact s) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
IsCompact.induction_on hs integrableOn_empty (fun _u _v huv hv => hv.mono_set huv)
(fun _u _v hu hv => integrableOn_union.mpr ⟨hu, hv⟩) hf
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.integrableOn_compact_subset (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) {t : Set X}
(hst : t ⊆ s) (ht : IsCompact t) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
(hf.mono_set hst).integrableOn_isCompact ht
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exist countably many open sets `u` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_countable_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ T : Set (Set X), T.Countable ∧
(∀ u ∈ T, IsOpen u) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ u ∈ T, u) ∧ (∀ u ∈ T, IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ) := by
have : ∀ x : s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x.1 ∈ u ∧ IntegrableOn f (u ∩ s) μ := by
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rcases hf x hx with ⟨t, ht, h't⟩
rcases mem_nhdsWithin.1 ht with ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, u_sub⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, x_mem, h't.mono_set u_sub⟩
choose u u_open xu hu using this
obtain ⟨T, T_count, hT⟩ : ∃ T : Set s, T.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ T, u i := by
have : s ⊆ ⋃ x : s, u x := fun y hy => mem_iUnion_of_mem ⟨y, hy⟩ (xu ⟨y, hy⟩)
obtain ⟨T, hT_count, hT_un⟩ := isOpen_iUnion_countable u u_open
exact ⟨T, hT_count, by rwa [hT_un]⟩
refine ⟨u '' T, T_count.image _, ?_, by rwa [biUnion_image], ?_⟩
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact u_open _
· rintro v ⟨w, -, rfl⟩
exact hu _
/-- If a function `f` is locally integrable on a set `s` in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets `u n` covering `s` such that `f` is integrable on each
set `u n ∩ s`. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ n, u n) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n ∩ s) μ) := by
rcases hf.exists_countable_integrableOn with ⟨T, T_count, T_open, sT, hT⟩
let T' : Set (Set X) := insert ∅ T
have T'_count : T'.Countable := Countable.insert ∅ T_count
have T'_ne : T'.Nonempty := by simp only [T', insert_nonempty]
rcases T'_count.exists_eq_range T'_ne with ⟨u, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· rw [h]
exact isOpen_empty
· exact T_open _ h
· intro x hx
obtain ⟨v, hv, h'v⟩ : ∃ v, v ∈ T ∧ x ∈ v := by simpa only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] using sT hx
have : v ∈ range u := by rw [← hu]; exact subset_insert ∅ T hv
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ : ∃ n, u n = v := by simpa only [mem_range] using this
exact mem_iUnion_of_mem _ h'v
· intro n
have : u n ∈ T' := by rw [hu]; exact mem_range_self n
rcases mem_insert_iff.1 this with h|h
· simp only [h, empty_inter, integrableOn_empty]
· exact hT _ h
theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, -, su, hu⟩
have : s = ⋃ n, u n ∩ s := by rw [← iUnion_inter]; exact (inter_eq_right.mpr su).symm
rw [this, aestronglyMeasurable_iUnion_iff]
exact fun i : ℕ => (hu i).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If `s` is locally closed (e.g. open or closed), then `f` is locally integrable on `s` iff it is
integrable on every compact subset contained in `s`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] (hs : IsLocallyClosed s) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ ∀ (k : Set X), k ⊆ s → IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ := by
refine ⟨fun hf k hk ↦ hf.integrableOn_compact_subset hk, fun hf x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs with ⟨U, Z, hU, hZ, rfl⟩
rcases exists_compact_subset hU hx.1 with ⟨K, hK, hxK, hKU⟩
rw [nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hU.mem_nhds hx.1)]
refine ⟨Z ∩ K, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.1 hxK), ?_⟩
exact hf (Z ∩ K) (fun y hy ↦ ⟨hKU hy.2, hy.1⟩) (.inter_left hK hZ)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.add
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f + g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).add (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.sub
(hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : LocallyIntegrableOn g s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (f - g) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).sub (hg x hx)
protected theorem LocallyIntegrableOn.neg (hf : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ) :
LocallyIntegrableOn (-f) s μ := fun x hx ↦ (hf x hx).neg
end LocallyIntegrableOn
/-- A function `f : X → E` is *locally integrable* if it is integrable on a neighborhood of every
point. In particular, it is integrable on all compact sets,
see `LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact`. -/
def LocallyIntegrable (f : X → E) (μ : Measure X := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : X, IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ
theorem locallyIntegrable_comap (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
LocallyIntegrable (fun x : s ↦ f x) (μ.comap Subtype.val) ↔ LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [LocallyIntegrableOn, Subtype.forall', ← map_nhds_subtype_val]
exact forall_congr' fun _ ↦ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableAtFilter_iff_comap.symm
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_univ : LocallyIntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
simp only [LocallyIntegrableOn, nhdsWithin_univ, mem_univ, true_imp_iff]; rfl
theorem LocallyIntegrable.locallyIntegrableOn (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (s : Set X) :
LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := fun x _ => (hf x).filter_mono nhdsWithin_le_nhds
theorem Integrable.locallyIntegrable (hf : Integrable f μ) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := fun _ =>
hf.integrableAtFilter _
theorem LocallyIntegrable.mono (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {g : X → F}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖g x‖ ≤ ‖f x‖) :
LocallyIntegrable g μ := by
rw [← locallyIntegrableOn_univ] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono hg h
/-- If `f` is locally integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`, it is locally integrable on `s`.
(See `locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict` for an iff statement when `s` is
closed.) -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s)) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ := by
intro x _
obtain ⟨t, ht_mem, ht_int⟩ := hf x
obtain ⟨u, hu_sub, hu_o, hu_mem⟩ := mem_nhds_iff.mp ht_mem
refine ⟨_, inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (hu_o.mem_nhds hu_mem), ?_⟩
simpa only [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet, inter_comm] using
ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
/-- If `s` is closed, being locally integrable on `s` wrt `μ` is equivalent to being locally
integrable with respect to `μ.restrict s`. For the one-way implication without assuming `s` closed,
see `locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict`. -/
theorem locallyIntegrableOn_iff_locallyIntegrable_restrict [OpensMeasurableSpace X]
(hs : IsClosed s) : LocallyIntegrableOn f s μ ↔ LocallyIntegrable f (μ.restrict s) := by
refine ⟨fun hf x => ?_, locallyIntegrableOn_of_locallyIntegrable_restrict⟩
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· obtain ⟨t, ht_nhds, ht_int⟩ := hf x h
obtain ⟨u, hu_o, hu_x, hu_sub⟩ := mem_nhdsWithin.mp ht_nhds
refine ⟨u, hu_o.mem_nhds hu_x, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict hu_o.measurableSet]
exact ht_int.mono_set hu_sub
· rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at hs
refine ⟨sᶜ, hs.mem_nhds h, ?_⟩
rw [IntegrableOn, restrict_restrict, inter_comm, inter_compl_self, ← IntegrableOn]
exacts [integrableOn_empty, hs.measurableSet]
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on any compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_isCompact {k : Set X} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hk : IsCompact k) : IntegrableOn f k μ :=
(hf.locallyIntegrableOn k).integrableOn_isCompact hk
/-- If a function is locally integrable, then it is integrable on an open neighborhood of any
compact set. -/
theorem LocallyIntegrable.integrableOn_nhds_isCompact (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) {k : Set X}
(hk : IsCompact k) : ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ k ⊆ u ∧ IntegrableOn f u μ := by
refine IsCompact.induction_on hk ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· refine ⟨∅, isOpen_empty, Subset.rfl, integrableOn_empty⟩
· rintro s t hst ⟨u, u_open, tu, hu⟩
exact ⟨u, u_open, hst.trans tu, hu⟩
· rintro s t ⟨u, u_open, su, hu⟩ ⟨v, v_open, tv, hv⟩
exact ⟨u ∪ v, u_open.union v_open, union_subset_union su tv, hu.union hv⟩
· intro x _
rcases hf x with ⟨u, ux, hu⟩
rcases mem_nhds_iff.1 ux with ⟨v, vu, v_open, xv⟩
exact ⟨v, nhdsWithin_le_nhds (v_open.mem_nhds xv), v, v_open, Subset.rfl, hu.mono_set vu⟩
theorem locallyIntegrable_iff [LocallyCompactSpace X] :
LocallyIntegrable f μ ↔ ∀ k : Set X, IsCompact k → IntegrableOn f k μ :=
⟨fun hf _k hk => hf.integrableOn_isCompact hk, fun hf x =>
let ⟨K, hK, h2K⟩ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x
⟨K, h2K, hf K hK⟩⟩
theorem LocallyIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
simpa only [restrict_univ] using (locallyIntegrableOn_univ.mpr hf).aestronglyMeasurable
/-- If a function is locally integrable in a second countable topological space,
then there exists a sequence of open sets covering the space on which it is integrable. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LocallyIntegrable.lean | 241 | 252 | theorem LocallyIntegrable.exists_nat_integrableOn [SecondCountableTopology X]
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) : ∃ u : ℕ → Set X,
(∀ n, IsOpen (u n)) ∧ ((⋃ n, u n) = univ) ∧ (∀ n, IntegrableOn f (u n) μ) := by | rcases (hf.locallyIntegrableOn univ).exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_union, hu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, eq_univ_of_univ_subset u_union, fun n ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [inter_univ] using hu n
theorem MemLp.locallyIntegrable [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : X → E} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : MemLp f p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) : LocallyIntegrable f μ := by
intro x
rcases μ.finiteAt_nhds x with ⟨U, hU, h'U⟩
have : Fact (μ U < ⊤) := ⟨h'U⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Ken Lee, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.GCD
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Basic
/-!
# Additional lemmas about elements of a ring satisfying `IsCoprime`
and elements of a monoid satisfying `IsRelPrime`
These lemmas are in a separate file to the definition of `IsCoprime` or `IsRelPrime`
as they require more imports.
Notably, this includes lemmas about `Finset.prod` as this requires importing BigOperators, and
lemmas about `Pow` since these are easiest to prove via `Finset.prod`.
-/
universe u v
open scoped Function -- required for scoped `on` notation
section IsCoprime
variable {R : Type u} {I : Type v} [CommSemiring R] {x y z : R} {s : I → R} {t : Finset I}
section
theorem Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one {m n : ℤ} : IsCoprime m n ↔ Int.gcd m n = 1 := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, h⟩
refine Nat.dvd_one.mp (Int.gcd_dvd_iff.mpr ⟨a, b, ?_⟩)
rwa [mul_comm m, mul_comm n, eq_comm]
· rw [← Int.ofNat_inj, IsCoprime, Int.gcd_eq_gcd_ab, mul_comm m, mul_comm n, Nat.cast_one]
intro h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
theorem Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime {m n : ℕ} : IsCoprime (m : ℤ) n ↔ Nat.Coprime m n := by
rw [Int.isCoprime_iff_gcd_eq_one, Int.gcd_natCast_natCast]
alias ⟨IsCoprime.nat_coprime, Nat.Coprime.isCoprime⟩ := Nat.isCoprime_iff_coprime
theorem Nat.Coprime.cast {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {a b : ℕ} (h : Nat.Coprime a b) :
IsCoprime (a : R) (b : R) := by
rw [← isCoprime_iff_coprime] at h
rw [← Int.cast_natCast a, ← Int.cast_natCast b]
exact IsCoprime.intCast h
theorem ne_zero_or_ne_zero_of_nat_coprime {A : Type u} [CommRing A] [Nontrivial A] {a b : ℕ}
(h : Nat.Coprime a b) : (a : A) ≠ 0 ∨ (b : A) ≠ 0 :=
IsCoprime.ne_zero_or_ne_zero (R := A) <| by
simpa only [map_natCast] using IsCoprime.map (Nat.Coprime.isCoprime h) (Int.castRingHom A)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x) → IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (fun _ ↦ isCoprime_one_left) fun b t hbt ih H ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt]
rw [Finset.forall_mem_insert] at H
exact H.1.mul_left (ih H.2)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right : (∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i)) → IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.prod_left_iff : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) x := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on t (iff_of_true isCoprime_one_left fun _ ↦ by simp) fun b t hbt ih ↦ ?_
rw [Finset.prod_insert hbt, IsCoprime.mul_left_iff, ih, Finset.forall_mem_insert]
theorem IsCoprime.prod_right_iff : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime x (s i) := by
simpa only [isCoprime_comm] using IsCoprime.prod_left_iff (R := R)
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_left (H1 : IsCoprime (∏ i ∈ t, s i) x) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime (s i) x :=
IsCoprime.prod_left_iff.1 H1 i hit
theorem IsCoprime.of_prod_right (H1 : IsCoprime x (∏ i ∈ t, s i)) (i : I) (hit : i ∈ t) :
IsCoprime x (s i) :=
IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.1 H1 i hit
-- Porting note: removed names of things due to linter, but they seem helpful
theorem Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime :
(t : Set I).Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) → (∀ i ∈ t, s i ∣ z) → (∏ x ∈ t, s x) ∣ z := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on t (fun _ _ ↦ one_dvd z)
(by
intro a r har ih Hs Hs1
rw [Finset.prod_insert har]
have aux1 : a ∈ (↑(insert a r) : Set I) := Finset.mem_insert_self a r
refine
(IsCoprime.prod_right fun i hir ↦
Hs aux1 (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hir) <| by
rintro rfl
exact har hir).mul_dvd
(Hs1 a aux1) (ih (Hs.mono ?_) fun i hi ↦ Hs1 i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
simp only [Finset.coe_insert, Set.subset_insert])
theorem Fintype.prod_dvd_of_coprime [Fintype I] (Hs : Pairwise (IsCoprime on s))
(Hs1 : ∀ i, s i ∣ z) : (∏ x, s x) ∣ z :=
Finset.prod_dvd_of_coprime (Hs.set_pairwise _) fun i _ ↦ Hs1 i
end
open Finset
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime [DecidableEq I] (h : t.Nonempty) :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) = 1) ↔
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) := by
induction h using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton =>
simp [exists_apply_eq, Pairwise, Function.onFun]
| cons a t hat h ih =>
rw [pairwise_cons']
have mem : ∀ x ∈ t, a ∈ insert a t \ {x} := fun x hx ↦ by
rw [mem_sdiff, mem_singleton]
exact ⟨mem_insert_self _ _, fun ha ↦ hat (ha ▸ hx)⟩
constructor
· rintro ⟨μ, hμ⟩
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat] at hμ
refine ⟨ih.mp ⟨Pi.single h.choose (μ a * s h.choose) + μ * fun _ ↦ s a, ?_⟩, fun b hb ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [prod_eq_mul_prod_diff_singleton h.choose_spec, ← mul_assoc, ←
@if_pos _ _ h.choose_spec R (_ * _) 0, ← sum_pi_single', ← sum_add_distrib] at hμ
rw [← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
dsimp -- Porting note: terms were showing as sort of `HAdd.hadd` instead of `+`
-- this whole proof pretty much breaks and has to be rewritten from scratch
rw [add_mul]
congr 1
· by_cases hx : x = h.choose
· rw [hx, Pi.single_eq_same, Pi.single_eq_same]
· rw [Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, Pi.single_eq_of_ne hx, zero_mul]
· rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _, mul_comm]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· have : IsCoprime (s b) (s a) :=
⟨μ a * ∏ i ∈ t \ {b}, s i, ∑ i ∈ t, μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j, ?_⟩
· exact ⟨this.symm, this⟩
rw [mul_assoc, ← prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul hb, sum_mul, ← hμ, sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
· rintro ⟨hs, Hb⟩
obtain ⟨μ, hμ⟩ := ih.mpr hs
obtain ⟨u, v, huv⟩ := IsCoprime.prod_left fun b hb ↦ (Hb b hb).right
use fun i ↦ if i = a then u else v * μ i
have hμ' : (∑ i ∈ t, v * ((μ i * ∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) * s a)) = v * s a := by
rw [← mul_sum, ← sum_mul, hμ, one_mul]
rw [sum_cons, cons_eq_insert, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase, erase_insert hat]
simp only [↓reduceIte, ite_mul]
rw [← huv, ← hμ', sum_congr rfl]
intro x hx
rw [mul_assoc, if_neg fun ha : x = a ↦ hat (ha.casesOn hx)]
rw [mul_assoc]
congr
rw [prod_eq_prod_diff_singleton_mul (mem x hx) _]
congr 2
rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_singleton_eq_erase a, erase_insert hat]
theorem exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime' [Fintype I] [Nonempty I] [DecidableEq I] :
(∃ μ : I → R, (∑ i : I, μ i * ∏ j ∈ {i}ᶜ, s j) = 1) ↔ Pairwise (IsCoprime on s) := by
convert exists_sum_eq_one_iff_pairwise_coprime Finset.univ_nonempty (s := s) using 1
simp only [Function.onFun, pairwise_subtype_iff_pairwise_finset', coe_univ, Set.pairwise_univ]
theorem pairwise_coprime_iff_coprime_prod [DecidableEq I] :
Pairwise (IsCoprime on fun i : t ↦ s i) ↔ ∀ i ∈ t, IsCoprime (s i) (∏ j ∈ t \ {i}, s j) := by
refine ⟨fun hp i hi ↦ IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mpr fun j hj ↦ ?_, fun hp ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_singleton] at hj
obtain ⟨hj, ji⟩ := hj
refine @hp ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ fun h ↦ ji (congrArg Subtype.val h).symm
-- Porting note: is there a better way compared to the old `congr_arg coe h`?
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩ h
apply IsCoprime.prod_right_iff.mp (hp i hi)
exact Finset.mem_sdiff.mpr ⟨hj, fun f ↦ h <| Subtype.ext (Finset.mem_singleton.mp f).symm⟩
variable {m n : ℕ}
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Coprime/Lemmas.lean | 185 | 194 | theorem IsCoprime.pow_left (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) y := by | rw [← Finset.card_range m, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_left fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow_right (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime x (y ^ n) := by
rw [← Finset.card_range n, ← Finset.prod_const]
exact IsCoprime.prod_right fun _ _ ↦ H
theorem IsCoprime.pow (H : IsCoprime x y) : IsCoprime (x ^ m) (y ^ n) :=
H.pow_left.pow_right |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LogDeriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ExpDeriv
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
/-!
# Derivative and series expansion of real logarithm
In this file we prove that `Real.log` is infinitely smooth at all nonzero `x : ℝ`. We also prove
that the series `∑' n : ℕ, x ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1)` converges to `(-Real.log (1 - x))` for all
`x : ℝ`, `|x| < 1`.
## Tags
logarithm, derivative
-/
open Filter Finset Set
open scoped Topology ContDiff
namespace Real
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
have : HasStrictDerivAt log (exp <| log x)⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_exp <| log x).of_local_left_inverse (continuousAt_log hx.ne')
(ne_of_gt <| exp_pos _) <|
Eventually.mono (lt_mem_nhds hx) @exp_log
rwa [exp_log hx] at this
theorem hasStrictDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasStrictDerivAt log x⁻¹ x := by
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· convert (hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hx)).comp x (hasStrictDerivAt_neg x) using 1
· ext y; exact (log_neg_eq_log y).symm
· field_simp [hx.ne]
· exact hasStrictDerivAt_log_of_pos hx
theorem hasDerivAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : HasDerivAt log x⁻¹ x :=
(hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).hasDerivAt
@[fun_prop] theorem differentiableAt_log (hx : x ≠ 0) : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x :=
(hasDerivAt_log hx).differentiableAt
theorem differentiableOn_log : DifferentiableOn ℝ log {0}ᶜ := fun _x hx =>
(differentiableAt_log hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp]
theorem differentiableAt_log_iff : DifferentiableAt ℝ log x ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun h => continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, differentiableAt_log⟩
theorem deriv_log (x : ℝ) : deriv log x = x⁻¹ :=
if hx : x = 0 then by
rw [deriv_zero_of_not_differentiableAt (differentiableAt_log_iff.not_left.2 hx), hx, inv_zero]
else (hasDerivAt_log hx).deriv
@[simp]
theorem deriv_log' : deriv log = Inv.inv :=
funext deriv_log
theorem contDiffAt_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {x : ℝ} : ContDiffAt ℝ n log x ↔ x ≠ 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ continuousAt_log_iff.1 h.continuousAt, fun hx ↦ ?_⟩
have A y (hy : 0 < y) : ContDiffAt ℝ n log y := by
apply expPartialHomeomorph.contDiffAt_symm_deriv (f₀' := y) hy.ne' (by simpa)
· convert hasDerivAt_exp (log y)
rw [exp_log hy]
· exact analyticAt_rexp.contDiffAt
rcases hx.lt_or_lt with hx | hx
· have : ContDiffAt ℝ n (log ∘ (fun y ↦ -y)) x := by
apply ContDiffAt.comp
apply A _ (Left.neg_pos_iff.mpr hx)
apply contDiffAt_id.neg
convert this
ext x
simp
· exact A x hx
theorem contDiffOn_log {n : WithTop ℕ∞} : ContDiffOn ℝ n log {0}ᶜ := by
intro x hx
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at hx
exact (contDiffAt_log.2 hx).contDiffWithinAt
end Real
section LogDifferentiable
open Real
section deriv
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {x f' : ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem HasDerivWithinAt.log (hf : HasDerivWithinAt f f' s x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivWithinAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) s x := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasDerivAt_log hx).comp_hasDerivWithinAt x hf
theorem HasDerivAt.log (hf : HasDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by
rw [← hasDerivWithinAt_univ] at *
exact hf.log hx
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Deriv.lean | 111 | 114 | theorem HasStrictDerivAt.log (hf : HasStrictDerivAt f f' x) (hx : f x ≠ 0) :
HasStrictDerivAt (fun y => log (f y)) (f' / f x) x := by | rw [div_eq_inv_mul]
exact (hasStrictDerivAt_log hx).comp x hf |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning, Patrick Lutz
-/
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Galois.Basic
/-!
# Galois Groups of Polynomials
In this file, we introduce the Galois group of a polynomial `p` over a field `F`,
defined as the automorphism group of its splitting field. We also provide
some results about some extension `E` above `p.SplittingField`.
## Main definitions
- `Polynomial.Gal p`: the Galois group of a polynomial p.
- `Polynomial.Gal.restrict p E`: the restriction homomorphism `(E ≃ₐ[F] E) → gal p`.
- `Polynomial.Gal.galAction p E`: the action of `gal p` on the roots of `p` in `E`.
## Main results
- `Polynomial.Gal.restrict_smul`: `restrict p E` is compatible with `gal_action p E`.
- `Polynomial.Gal.galActionHom_injective`: `gal p` acting on the roots of `p` in `E` is faithful.
- `Polynomial.Gal.restrictProd_injective`: `gal (p * q)` embeds as a subgroup of `gal p × gal q`.
- `Polynomial.Gal.card_of_separable`: For a separable polynomial, its Galois group has cardinality
equal to the dimension of its splitting field over `F`.
- `Polynomial.Gal.galActionHom_bijective_of_prime_degree`:
An irreducible polynomial of prime degree with two non-real roots has full Galois group.
## Other results
- `Polynomial.Gal.card_complex_roots_eq_card_real_add_card_not_gal_inv`: The number of complex roots
equals the number of real roots plus the number of roots not fixed by complex conjugation
(i.e. with some imaginary component).
-/
assert_not_exists Real
noncomputable section
open scoped Polynomial
open Module
namespace Polynomial
variable {F : Type*} [Field F] (p q : F[X]) (E : Type*) [Field E] [Algebra F E]
/-- The Galois group of a polynomial. -/
def Gal :=
p.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] p.SplittingField
-- The `Group, Fintype` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Gal
instance instGroup : Group (Gal p) :=
inferInstanceAs (Group (p.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] p.SplittingField))
instance instFintype : Fintype (Gal p) :=
inferInstanceAs (Fintype (p.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] p.SplittingField))
instance : EquivLike p.Gal p.SplittingField p.SplittingField :=
inferInstanceAs (EquivLike (p.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] p.SplittingField) _ _)
instance : AlgEquivClass p.Gal F p.SplittingField p.SplittingField :=
inferInstanceAs (AlgEquivClass (p.SplittingField ≃ₐ[F] p.SplittingField) F _ _)
instance applyMulSemiringAction : MulSemiringAction p.Gal p.SplittingField :=
AlgEquiv.applyMulSemiringAction
@[ext]
| Mathlib/FieldTheory/PolynomialGaloisGroup.lean | 74 | 79 | theorem ext {σ τ : p.Gal} (h : ∀ x ∈ p.rootSet p.SplittingField, σ x = τ x) : σ = τ := by | refine
AlgEquiv.ext fun x =>
(AlgHom.mem_equalizer σ.toAlgHom τ.toAlgHom x).mp
((SetLike.ext_iff.mp ?_ x).mpr Algebra.mem_top)
rwa [eq_top_iff, ← SplittingField.adjoin_rootSet, Algebra.adjoin_le_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Mario Carneiro, Sean Leather
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Union
/-!
# Finite sets in `Option α`
In this file we define
* `Option.toFinset`: construct an empty or singleton `Finset α` from an `Option α`;
* `Finset.insertNone`: given `s : Finset α`, lift it to a finset on `Option α` using `Option.some`
and then insert `Option.none`;
* `Finset.eraseNone`: given `s : Finset (Option α)`, returns `t : Finset α` such that
`x ∈ t ↔ some x ∈ s`.
Then we prove some basic lemmas about these definitions.
## Tags
finset, option
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
open Function
namespace Option
/-- Construct an empty or singleton finset from an `Option` -/
def toFinset (o : Option α) : Finset α :=
o.elim ∅ singleton
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_none : none.toFinset = (∅ : Finset α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_some {a : α} : (some a).toFinset = {a} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinset {a : α} {o : Option α} : a ∈ o.toFinset ↔ a ∈ o := by
cases o <;> simp [eq_comm]
theorem card_toFinset (o : Option α) : o.toFinset.card = o.elim 0 1 := by cases o <;> rfl
end Option
namespace Finset
/-- Given a finset on `α`, lift it to being a finset on `Option α`
using `Option.some` and then insert `Option.none`. -/
def insertNone : Finset α ↪o Finset (Option α) :=
(OrderEmbedding.ofMapLEIff fun s => cons none (s.map Embedding.some) <| by simp) fun s t => by
rw [le_iff_subset, cons_subset_cons, map_subset_map, le_iff_subset]
@[simp]
theorem mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} : ∀ {o : Option α}, o ∈ insertNone s ↔ ∀ a ∈ o, a ∈ s
| none => iff_of_true (Multiset.mem_cons_self _ _) fun a h => by cases h
| some a => Multiset.mem_cons.trans <| by simp
lemma forall_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} {p : Option α → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ insertNone s, p a) ↔ p none ∧ ∀ a ∈ s, p a := by simp [Option.forall]
theorem some_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} {a : α} : some a ∈ insertNone s ↔ a ∈ s := by simp
lemma none_mem_insertNone {s : Finset α} : none ∈ insertNone s := by simp
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma insertNone_nonempty {s : Finset α} : insertNone s |>.Nonempty := ⟨none, none_mem_insertNone⟩
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Option.lean | 78 | 78 | theorem card_insertNone (s : Finset α) : s.insertNone.card = s.card + 1 := by | simp [insertNone] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact ENNReal.summable.tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_add ENNReal.summable]
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun _ ht _ hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
instance cofinite.instIsMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated μ.cofinite where
exists_measurable_subset s hs := by
refine ⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, ?_, (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
· rwa [compl_mem_cofinite, measure_toMeasurable]
· rw [compl_subset_comm]
apply subset_toMeasurable
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
section Intervals
theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ico a x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (Ici a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ico_right]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (antitone_const.Ico monotone_id)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,335 | 1,340 | theorem tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α]
[(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ioc x a)) atBot (𝓝 (μ (Iic a))) := by | rw [← iUnion_Ioc_left]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot (monotone_id.Ioc antitone_const) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 328 | 332 | theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by | rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 591 | 594 | theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by | rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Complex.Norm
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
/-!
# Exponential Function
This file contains the definitions of the real and complex exponential function.
## Main definitions
* `Complex.exp`: The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series
* `Real.exp`: The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential
-/
open CauSeq Finset IsAbsoluteValue
open scoped ComplexConjugate
namespace Complex
theorem isCauSeq_norm_exp (z : ℂ) :
IsCauSeq abs fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, ‖z ^ m / m.factorial‖ :=
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := exists_nat_gt ‖z‖
have hn0 : (0 : ℝ) < n := lt_of_le_of_lt (norm_nonneg _) hn
IsCauSeq.series_ratio_test n (‖z‖ / n) (div_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (le_of_lt hn0))
(by rwa [div_lt_iff₀ hn0, one_mul]) fun m hm => by
rw [abs_norm, abs_norm, Nat.factorial_succ, pow_succ', mul_comm m.succ, Nat.cast_mul,
← div_div, mul_div_assoc, mul_div_right_comm, Complex.norm_mul, Complex.norm_div,
norm_natCast]
gcongr
exact le_trans hm (Nat.le_succ _)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias isCauSeq_abs_exp := isCauSeq_norm_exp
noncomputable section
theorem isCauSeq_exp (z : ℂ) : IsCauSeq (‖·‖) fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial :=
(isCauSeq_norm_exp z).of_abv
/-- The Cauchy sequence consisting of partial sums of the Taylor series of
the complex exponential function -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp' (z : ℂ) : CauSeq ℂ (‖·‖) :=
⟨fun n => ∑ m ∈ range n, z ^ m / m.factorial, isCauSeq_exp z⟩
/-- The complex exponential function, defined via its Taylor series -/
@[pp_nodot]
def exp (z : ℂ) : ℂ :=
CauSeq.lim (exp' z)
/-- scoped notation for the complex exponential function -/
scoped notation "cexp" => Complex.exp
end
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
noncomputable section
/-- The real exponential function, defined as the real part of the complex exponential -/
@[pp_nodot]
nonrec def exp (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(exp x).re
/-- scoped notation for the real exponential function -/
scoped notation "rexp" => Real.exp
end
end Real
namespace Complex
variable (x y : ℂ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by
rw [exp]
refine lim_eq_of_equiv_const fun ε ε0 => ⟨1, fun j hj => ?_⟩
convert (config := .unfoldSameFun) ε0 -- ε0 : ε > 0 but goal is _ < ε
rcases j with - | j
· exact absurd hj (not_le_of_gt zero_lt_one)
· dsimp [exp']
induction' j with j ih
· dsimp [exp']; simp [show Nat.succ 0 = 1 from rfl]
· rw [← ih (by simp [Nat.succ_le_succ])]
simp only [sum_range_succ, pow_succ]
simp
theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by
have hj : ∀ j : ℕ, (∑ m ∈ range j, (x + y) ^ m / m.factorial) =
∑ i ∈ range j, ∑ k ∈ range (i + 1), x ^ k / k.factorial *
(y ^ (i - k) / (i - k).factorial) := by
intro j
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun m _ => ?_
rw [add_pow, div_eq_mul_inv, sum_mul]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl fun I hi => ?_
have h₁ : (m.choose I : ℂ) ≠ 0 :=
Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.1 (Nat.choose_pos (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (mem_range.1 hi))))
have h₂ := Nat.choose_mul_factorial_mul_factorial (Nat.le_of_lt_succ <| Finset.mem_range.1 hi)
rw [← h₂, Nat.cast_mul, Nat.cast_mul, mul_inv, mul_inv]
simp only [mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ), mul_assoc, mul_left_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)⁻¹,
mul_comm (m.choose I : ℂ)]
rw [inv_mul_cancel₀ h₁]
simp [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, mul_assoc, mul_left_comm]
simp_rw [exp, exp', lim_mul_lim]
apply (lim_eq_lim_of_equiv _).symm
simp only [hj]
exact cauchy_product (isCauSeq_norm_exp x) (isCauSeq_exp y)
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℂ` to `ℂ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ :=
{ toFun := fun z => exp z.toAdd,
map_one' := by simp,
map_mul' := by simp [exp_add] }
theorem exp_list_sum (l : List ℂ) : exp l.sum = (l.map exp).prod :=
map_list_prod (M := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom l
theorem exp_multiset_sum (s : Multiset ℂ) : exp s.sum = (s.map exp).prod :=
@MonoidHom.map_multiset_prod (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom s
theorem exp_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℂ) :
exp (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, exp (f x) :=
map_prod (β := Multiplicative ℂ) expMonoidHom f s
lemma exp_nsmul (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : exp (n • x) = exp x ^ n :=
@MonoidHom.map_pow (Multiplicative ℂ) ℂ _ _ expMonoidHom _ _
theorem exp_nat_mul (x : ℂ) : ∀ n : ℕ, exp (n * x) = exp x ^ n
| 0 => by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, exp_zero, pow_zero]
| Nat.succ n => by rw [pow_succ, Nat.cast_add_one, add_mul, exp_add, ← exp_nat_mul _ n, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_ne_zero : exp x ≠ 0 := fun h =>
zero_ne_one (α := ℂ) <| by rw [← exp_zero, ← add_neg_cancel x, exp_add, h]; simp
theorem exp_neg : exp (-x) = (exp x)⁻¹ := by
rw [← mul_right_inj' (exp_ne_zero x), ← exp_add]; simp [mul_inv_cancel₀ (exp_ne_zero x)]
theorem exp_sub : exp (x - y) = exp x / exp y := by
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, exp_add, exp_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem exp_int_mul (z : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : Complex.exp (n * z) = Complex.exp z ^ n := by
cases n
· simp [exp_nat_mul]
· simp [exp_add, add_mul, pow_add, exp_neg, exp_nat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem exp_conj : exp (conj x) = conj (exp x) := by
dsimp [exp]
rw [← lim_conj]
refine congr_arg CauSeq.lim (CauSeq.ext fun _ => ?_)
dsimp [exp', Function.comp_def, cauSeqConj]
rw [map_sum (starRingEnd _)]
refine sum_congr rfl fun n _ => ?_
rw [map_div₀, map_pow, ← ofReal_natCast, conj_ofReal]
@[simp]
theorem ofReal_exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : ((exp x).re : ℂ) = exp x :=
conj_eq_iff_re.1 <| by rw [← exp_conj, conj_ofReal]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_exp (x : ℝ) : (Real.exp x : ℂ) = exp x :=
ofReal_exp_ofReal_re _
@[simp]
theorem exp_ofReal_im (x : ℝ) : (exp x).im = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_exp_ofReal_re, ofReal_im]
| Mathlib/Data/Complex/Exponential.lean | 185 | 204 | theorem exp_ofReal_re (x : ℝ) : (exp x).re = Real.exp x :=
rfl
end Complex
namespace Real
open Complex
variable (x y : ℝ)
@[simp]
theorem exp_zero : exp 0 = 1 := by | simp [Real.exp]
nonrec theorem exp_add : exp (x + y) = exp x * exp y := by simp [exp_add, exp]
/-- the exponential function as a monoid hom from `Multiplicative ℝ` to `ℝ` -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def expMonoidHom : MonoidHom (Multiplicative ℝ) ℝ :=
{ toFun := fun x => exp x.toAdd, |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Balance
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Expect
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Star.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.CStarAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Operator.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.VectorSpace
/-!
# `RCLike`: a typeclass for ℝ or ℂ
This file defines the typeclass `RCLike` intended to have only two instances:
ℝ and ℂ. It is meant for definitions and theorems which hold for both the real and the complex case,
and in particular when the real case follows directly from the complex case by setting `re` to `id`,
`im` to zero and so on. Its API follows closely that of ℂ.
Applications include defining inner products and Hilbert spaces for both the real and
complex case. One typically produces the definitions and proof for an arbitrary field of this
typeclass, which basically amounts to doing the complex case, and the two cases then fall out
immediately from the two instances of the class.
The instance for `ℝ` is registered in this file.
The instance for `ℂ` is declared in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean`.
## Implementation notes
The coercion from reals into an `RCLike` field is done by registering `RCLike.ofReal` as
a `CoeTC`. For this to work, we must proceed carefully to avoid problems involving circular
coercions in the case `K=ℝ`; in particular, we cannot use the plain `Coe` and must set
priorities carefully. This problem was already solved for `ℕ`, and we copy the solution detailed
in `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Defs.lean`. See also Note [coercion into rings] for more details.
In addition, several lemmas need to be set at priority 900 to make sure that they do not override
their counterparts in `Mathlib/Analysis/Complex/Basic.lean` (which causes linter errors).
A few lemmas requiring heavier imports are in `Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Lemmas.lean`.
-/
open Fintype
open scoped BigOperators ComplexConjugate
section
local notation "𝓚" => algebraMap ℝ _
/--
This typeclass captures properties shared by ℝ and ℂ, with an API that closely matches that of ℂ.
-/
class RCLike (K : semiOutParam Type*) extends DenselyNormedField K, StarRing K,
NormedAlgebra ℝ K, CompleteSpace K where
/-- The real part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
re : K →+ ℝ
/-- The imaginary part as an additive monoid homomorphism -/
im : K →+ ℝ
/-- Imaginary unit in `K`. Meant to be set to `0` for `K = ℝ`. -/
I : K
I_re_ax : re I = 0
I_mul_I_ax : I = 0 ∨ I * I = -1
re_add_im_ax : ∀ z : K, 𝓚 (re z) + 𝓚 (im z) * I = z
ofReal_re_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, re (𝓚 r) = r
ofReal_im_ax : ∀ r : ℝ, im (𝓚 r) = 0
mul_re_ax : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w
mul_im_ax : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w
conj_re_ax : ∀ z : K, re (conj z) = re z
conj_im_ax : ∀ z : K, im (conj z) = -im z
conj_I_ax : conj I = -I
norm_sq_eq_def_ax : ∀ z : K, ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z
mul_im_I_ax : ∀ z : K, im z * im I = im z
/-- only an instance in the `ComplexOrder` locale -/
[toPartialOrder : PartialOrder K]
le_iff_re_im {z w : K} : z ≤ w ↔ re z ≤ re w ∧ im z = im w
-- note we cannot put this in the `extends` clause
[toDecidableEq : DecidableEq K]
scoped[ComplexOrder] attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toPartialOrder
attribute [instance 100] RCLike.toDecidableEq
end
variable {K E : Type*} [RCLike K]
namespace RCLike
/-- Coercion from `ℝ` to an `RCLike` field. -/
@[coe] abbrev ofReal : ℝ → K := Algebra.cast
/- The priority must be set at 900 to ensure that coercions are tried in the right order.
See Note [coercion into rings], or `Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/Basic.lean` for more details. -/
noncomputable instance (priority := 900) algebraMapCoe : CoeTC ℝ K :=
⟨ofReal⟩
theorem ofReal_alg (x : ℝ) : (x : K) = x • (1 : K) :=
Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one x
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : r • z = (r : K) * z :=
Algebra.smul_def r z
theorem real_smul_eq_coe_smul [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E] [Module ℝ E] [IsScalarTower ℝ K E]
(r : ℝ) (x : E) : r • x = (r : K) • x := by rw [RCLike.ofReal_alg, smul_one_smul]
theorem algebraMap_eq_ofReal : ⇑(algebraMap ℝ K) = ofReal :=
rfl
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem re_add_im (z : K) : (re z : K) + im z * I = z :=
RCLike.re_add_im_ax z
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_re : ∀ r : ℝ, re (r : K) = r :=
RCLike.ofReal_re_ax
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem ofReal_im : ∀ r : ℝ, im (r : K) = 0 :=
RCLike.ofReal_im_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_re : ∀ z w : K, re (z * w) = re z * re w - im z * im w :=
RCLike.mul_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem mul_im : ∀ z w : K, im (z * w) = re z * im w + im z * re w :=
RCLike.mul_im_ax
theorem ext_iff {z w : K} : z = w ↔ re z = re w ∧ im z = im w :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => re_add_im z ▸ re_add_im w ▸ h₁ ▸ h₂ ▸ rfl⟩
theorem ext {z w : K} (hre : re z = re w) (him : im z = im w) : z = w :=
ext_iff.2 ⟨hre, him⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zero : ((0 : ℝ) : K) = 0 :=
algebraMap.coe_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem zero_re' : re (0 : K) = (0 : ℝ) :=
map_zero re
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_one : ((1 : ℝ) : K) = 1 :=
map_one (algebraMap ℝ K)
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_re : re (1 : K) = 1 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_re]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem one_im : im (1 : K) = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_one, ofReal_im]
theorem ofReal_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : ℝ → K) :=
(algebraMap ℝ K).injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inj {z w : ℝ} : (z : K) = (w : K) ↔ z = w :=
algebraMap.coe_inj
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_re`
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofNat_im`
theorem ofReal_eq_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
algebraMap.lift_map_eq_zero_iff x
theorem ofReal_ne_zero {x : ℝ} : (x : K) ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
ofReal_eq_zero.not
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_add (r s : ℝ) : ((r + s : ℝ) : K) = r + s :=
algebraMap.coe_add _ _
-- replaced by `RCLike.ofReal_ofNat`
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_neg (r : ℝ) : ((-r : ℝ) : K) = -r :=
algebraMap.coe_neg r
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sub (r s : ℝ) : ((r - s : ℝ) : K) = r - s :=
map_sub (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_sum {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∑ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∑ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_sum (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsupp_sum {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.sum fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.sum fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppSum (algebraMap ℝ K) f g
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_mul (r s : ℝ) : ((r * s : ℝ) : K) = r * s :=
algebraMap.coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_pow (r : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_pow (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_prod {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) :
((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ) : K) = ∏ i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_prod (algebraMap ℝ K) _ _
@[simp, rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_finsuppProd {α M : Type*} [Zero M] (f : α →₀ M) (g : α → M → ℝ) :
((f.prod fun a b => g a b : ℝ) : K) = f.prod fun a b => (g a b : K) :=
map_finsuppProd _ f g
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-06")] alias ofReal_finsupp_prod := ofReal_finsuppProd
@[simp, norm_cast, rclike_simps]
theorem real_smul_ofReal (r x : ℝ) : r • (x : K) = (r : K) * (x : K) :=
real_smul_eq_coe_mul _ _
@[rclike_simps]
theorem re_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (↑r * z) = r * re z := by
simp only [mul_re, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, sub_zero]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem im_ofReal_mul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (↑r * z) = r * im z := by
simp only [add_zero, ofReal_im, zero_mul, ofReal_re, mul_im]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_re (r : ℝ) (z : K) : re (r • z) = r * re z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem smul_im (r : ℝ) (z : K) : im (r • z) = r * im z := by
rw [real_smul_eq_coe_mul, im_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem norm_ofReal (r : ℝ) : ‖(r : K)‖ = |r| :=
norm_algebraMap' K r
/-! ### Characteristic zero -/
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- ℝ and ℂ are both of characteristic zero. -/
instance (priority := 100) charZero_rclike : CharZero K :=
(RingHom.charZero_iff (algebraMap ℝ K).injective).1 inferInstance
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_expect {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → ℝ) : 𝔼 i ∈ s, f i = 𝔼 i ∈ s, (f i : K) :=
map_expect (algebraMap ..) ..
@[norm_cast]
lemma ofReal_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) (i : ι) :
((balance f i : ℝ) : K) = balance ((↑) ∘ f) i := map_balance (algebraMap ..) ..
@[simp] lemma ofReal_comp_balance {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → ℝ) :
ofReal ∘ balance f = balance (ofReal ∘ f : ι → K) := funext <| ofReal_balance _
/-! ### The imaginary unit, `I` -/
/-- The imaginary unit. -/
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_re : re (I : K) = 0 :=
I_re_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im (z : K) : im z * im (I : K) = im z :=
mul_im_I_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem I_im' (z : K) : im (I : K) * im z = im z := by rw [mul_comm, I_im]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem I_mul_re (z : K) : re (I * z) = -im z := by
simp only [I_re, zero_sub, I_im', zero_mul, mul_re]
theorem I_mul_I : (I : K) = 0 ∨ (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax
variable (𝕜) in
lemma I_eq_zero_or_im_I_eq_one : (I : K) = 0 ∨ im (I : K) = 1 :=
I_mul_I (K := K) |>.imp_right fun h ↦ by simpa [h] using (I_mul_re (I : K)).symm
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_re (z : K) : re (conj z) = re z :=
RCLike.conj_re_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_im (z : K) : im (conj z) = -im z :=
RCLike.conj_im_ax z
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_I : conj (I : K) = -I :=
RCLike.conj_I_ax
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem conj_ofReal (r : ℝ) : conj (r : K) = (r : K) := by
rw [ext_iff]
simp only [ofReal_im, conj_im, eq_self_iff_true, conj_re, and_self_iff, neg_zero]
-- replaced by `RCLike.conj_ofNat`
theorem conj_nat_cast (n : ℕ) : conj (n : K) = n := map_natCast _ _
theorem conj_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : conj (ofNat(n) : K) = ofNat(n) :=
map_ofNat _ _
@[rclike_simps, simp]
theorem conj_neg_I : conj (-I) = (I : K) := by rw [map_neg, conj_I, neg_neg]
theorem conj_eq_re_sub_im (z : K) : conj z = re z - im z * I :=
(congr_arg conj (re_add_im z).symm).trans <| by
rw [map_add, map_mul, conj_I, conj_ofReal, conj_ofReal, mul_neg, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem sub_conj (z : K) : z - conj z = 2 * im z * I :=
calc
z - conj z = re z + im z * I - (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, ← conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * im z * I := by rw [add_sub_sub_cancel, ← two_mul, mul_assoc]
@[rclike_simps]
theorem conj_smul (r : ℝ) (z : K) : conj (r • z) = r • conj z := by
rw [conj_eq_re_sub_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im, smul_re, smul_im, ofReal_mul, ofReal_mul,
real_smul_eq_coe_mul r (_ - _), mul_sub, mul_assoc]
theorem add_conj (z : K) : z + conj z = 2 * re z :=
calc
z + conj z = re z + im z * I + (re z - im z * I) := by rw [re_add_im, conj_eq_re_sub_im]
_ = 2 * re z := by rw [add_add_sub_cancel, two_mul]
theorem re_eq_add_conj (z : K) : ↑(re z) = (z + conj z) / 2 := by
rw [add_conj, mul_div_cancel_left₀ (re z : K) two_ne_zero]
theorem im_eq_conj_sub (z : K) : ↑(im z) = I * (conj z - z) / 2 := by
rw [← neg_inj, ← ofReal_neg, ← I_mul_re, re_eq_add_conj, map_mul, conj_I, ← neg_div, ← mul_neg,
neg_sub, mul_sub, neg_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
open List in
/-- There are several equivalent ways to say that a number `z` is in fact a real number. -/
theorem is_real_TFAE (z : K) : TFAE [conj z = z, ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z, ↑(re z) = z, im z = 0] := by
tfae_have 1 → 4
| h => by
rw [← @ofReal_inj K, im_eq_conj_sub, h, sub_self, mul_zero, zero_div,
ofReal_zero]
tfae_have 4 → 3
| h => by
conv_rhs => rw [← re_add_im z, h, ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
tfae_have 3 → 2 := fun h => ⟨_, h⟩
tfae_have 2 → 1 := fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => hr ▸ conj_ofReal _
tfae_finish
theorem conj_eq_iff_real {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, z = (r : K) :=
calc
_ ↔ ∃ r : ℝ, (r : K) = z := (is_real_TFAE z).out 0 1
_ ↔ _ := by simp only [eq_comm]
theorem conj_eq_iff_re {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ (re z : K) = z :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 2
theorem conj_eq_iff_im {z : K} : conj z = z ↔ im z = 0 :=
(is_real_TFAE z).out 0 3
@[simp]
theorem star_def : (Star.star : K → K) = conj :=
rfl
variable (K)
/-- Conjugation as a ring equivalence. This is used to convert the inner product into a
sesquilinear product. -/
abbrev conjToRingEquiv : K ≃+* Kᵐᵒᵖ :=
starRingEquiv
variable {K} {z : K}
/-- The norm squared function. -/
def normSq : K →*₀ ℝ where
toFun z := re z * re z + im z * im z
map_zero' := by simp only [add_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
map_one' := by simp only [one_im, add_zero, mul_one, one_re, mul_zero]
map_mul' z w := by
simp only [mul_im, mul_re]
ring
theorem normSq_apply (z : K) : normSq z = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
rfl
theorem norm_sq_eq_def {z : K} : ‖z‖ ^ 2 = re z * re z + im z * im z :=
norm_sq_eq_def_ax z
theorem normSq_eq_def' (z : K) : normSq z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 :=
norm_sq_eq_def.symm
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_zero : normSq (0 : K) = 0 :=
normSq.map_zero
@[rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_one : normSq (1 : K) = 1 :=
normSq.map_one
theorem normSq_nonneg (z : K) : 0 ≤ normSq z :=
add_nonneg (mul_self_nonneg _) (mul_self_nonneg _)
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_eq_zero {z : K} : normSq z = 0 ↔ z = 0 :=
map_eq_zero _
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_pos {z : K} : 0 < normSq z ↔ z ≠ 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, Ne, eq_comm]; simp [normSq_nonneg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_neg (z : K) : normSq (-z) = normSq z := by simp only [normSq_eq_def', norm_neg]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem normSq_conj (z : K) : normSq (conj z) = normSq z := by
simp only [normSq_apply, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_mul (z w : K) : normSq (z * w) = normSq z * normSq w :=
map_mul _ z w
theorem normSq_add (z w : K) : normSq (z + w) = normSq z + normSq w + 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_apply, map_add, rclike_simps]
ring
theorem re_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : re z * re z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_right (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem im_sq_le_normSq (z : K) : im z * im z ≤ normSq z :=
le_add_of_nonneg_left (mul_self_nonneg _)
theorem mul_conj (z : K) : z * conj z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by
apply ext <;> simp [← ofReal_pow, norm_sq_eq_def, mul_comm]
theorem conj_mul (z : K) : conj z * z = ‖z‖ ^ 2 := by rw [mul_comm, mul_conj]
lemma inv_eq_conj (hz : ‖z‖ = 1) : z⁻¹ = conj z :=
inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_left <| by simp_rw [conj_mul, hz, algebraMap.coe_one, one_pow]
theorem normSq_sub (z w : K) : normSq (z - w) = normSq z + normSq w - 2 * re (z * conj w) := by
simp only [normSq_add, sub_eq_add_neg, map_neg, mul_neg, normSq_neg, map_neg]
theorem sqrt_normSq_eq_norm {z : K} : √(normSq z) = ‖z‖ := by
rw [normSq_eq_def', Real.sqrt_sq (norm_nonneg _)]
/-! ### Inversion -/
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_inv (r : ℝ) : ((r⁻¹ : ℝ) : K) = (r : K)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ _ r
theorem inv_def (z : K) : z⁻¹ = conj z * ((‖z‖ ^ 2)⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀)
· simp
· apply inv_eq_of_mul_eq_one_right
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_conj, ofReal_inv, ofReal_pow, mul_inv_cancel₀]
simpa
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_re (z : K) : re z⁻¹ = re z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, re_ofReal_mul, conj_re, div_eq_inv_mul]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_im (z : K) : im z⁻¹ = -im z / normSq z := by
rw [inv_def, normSq_eq_def', mul_comm, im_ofReal_mul, conj_im, div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem div_re (z w : K) : re (z / w) = re z * re w / normSq w + im z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul, mul_neg, neg_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
theorem div_im (z w : K) : im (z / w) = im z * re w / normSq w - re z * im w / normSq w := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg, map_neg,
rclike_simps]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem conj_inv (x : K) : conj x⁻¹ = (conj x)⁻¹ :=
star_inv₀ _
lemma conj_div (x y : K) : conj (x / y) = conj x / conj y := map_div' conj conj_inv _ _
--TODO: Do we rather want the map as an explicit definition?
lemma exists_norm_eq_mul_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ ↑‖x‖ = c * x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨‖x‖ / x, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
lemma exists_norm_mul_eq_self (x : K) : ∃ c, ‖c‖ = 1 ∧ c * ‖x‖ = x := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· exact ⟨1, by simp⟩
· exact ⟨x / ‖x‖, by simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2, hx]⟩
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_div (r s : ℝ) : ((r / s : ℝ) : K) = r / s :=
map_div₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r s
theorem div_re_ofReal {z : K} {r : ℝ} : re (z / r) = re z / r := by
rw [div_eq_inv_mul, div_eq_inv_mul, ← ofReal_inv, re_ofReal_mul]
@[rclike_simps, norm_cast]
theorem ofReal_zpow (r : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ((r ^ n : ℝ) : K) = (r : K) ^ n :=
map_zpow₀ (algebraMap ℝ K) r n
theorem I_mul_I_of_nonzero : (I : K) ≠ 0 → (I : K) * I = -1 :=
I_mul_I_ax.resolve_left
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem inv_I : (I : K)⁻¹ = -I := by
by_cases h : (I : K) = 0
· simp [h]
· field_simp [I_mul_I_of_nonzero h]
@[simp, rclike_simps]
theorem div_I (z : K) : z / I = -(z * I) := by rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_I, mul_neg]
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_inv (z : K) : normSq z⁻¹ = (normSq z)⁻¹ :=
map_inv₀ normSq z
@[rclike_simps] -- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11119): was `simp`
theorem normSq_div (z w : K) : normSq (z / w) = normSq z / normSq w :=
map_div₀ normSq z w
@[simp 1100, rclike_simps]
| Mathlib/Analysis/RCLike/Basic.lean | 522 | 523 | theorem norm_conj (z : K) : ‖conj z‖ = ‖z‖ := by | simp only [← sqrt_normSq_eq_norm, normSq_conj] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.JacobiSymbol
/-!
# A `norm_num` extension for Jacobi and Legendre symbols
We extend the `norm_num` tactic so that it can be used to provably compute
the value of the Jacobi symbol `J(a | b)` or the Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` when
the arguments are numerals.
## Implementation notes
We use the Law of Quadratic Reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol to compute the value of `J(a | b)`
efficiently, roughly comparable in effort with the euclidean algorithm for the computation
of the gcd of `a` and `b`. More precisely, the computation is done in the following steps.
* Use `J(a | 0) = 1` (an artifact of the definition) and `J(a | 1) = 1` to deal
with corner cases.
* Use `J(a | b) = J(a % b | b)` to reduce to the case that `a` is a natural number.
We define a version of the Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers for use in
the following steps; see `NormNum.jacobiSymNat`. (But we'll continue to write `J(a | b)`
in this description.)
* Remove powers of two from `b`. This is done via `J(2a | 2b) = 0` and
`J(2a+1 | 2b) = J(2a+1 | b)` (another artifact of the definition).
* Now `0 ≤ a < b` and `b` is odd. If `b = 1`, then the value is `1`.
If `a = 0` (and `b > 1`), then the value is `0`. Otherwise, we remove powers of two from `a`
via `J(4a | b) = J(a | b)` and `J(2a | b) = ±J(a | b)`, where the sign is determined
by the residue class of `b` mod 8, to reduce to `a` odd.
* Once `a` is odd, we use Quadratic Reciprocity (QR) in the form
`J(a | b) = ±J(b % a | a)`, where the sign is determined by the residue classes
of `a` and `b` mod 4. We are then back in the previous case.
We provide customized versions of these results for the various reduction steps,
where we encode the residue classes mod 2, mod 4, or mod 8 by using hypotheses like
`a % n = b`. In this way, the only divisions we have to compute and prove
are the ones occurring in the use of QR above.
-/
section Lemmas
namespace Mathlib.Meta.NormNum
/-- The Jacobi symbol restricted to natural numbers in both arguments. -/
def jacobiSymNat (a b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
jacobiSym a b
/-!
### API Lemmas
We repeat part of the API for `jacobiSym` with `NormNum.jacobiSymNat` and without implicit
arguments, in a form that is suitable for constructing proofs in `norm_num`.
-/
/-- Base cases: `b = 0`, `b = 1`, `a = 0`, `a = 1`. -/
theorem jacobiSymNat.zero_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 0 = 1 := by
rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.zero_right]
| Mathlib/Tactic/NormNum/LegendreSymbol.lean | 68 | 69 | theorem jacobiSymNat.one_right (a : ℕ) : jacobiSymNat a 1 = 1 := by | rw [jacobiSymNat, jacobiSym.one_right] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConvergenceInMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
/-!
# Uniform integrability
This file contains the definitions for uniform integrability (both in the measure theory sense
as well as the probability theory sense). This file also contains the Vitali convergence theorem
which establishes a relation between uniform integrability, convergence in measure and
Lp convergence.
Uniform integrability plays a vital role in the theory of martingales most notably is used to
formulate the martingale convergence theorem.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of functions `f` is uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there
exists some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` of smaller measure than `δ`, the Lp-norm of
`f i` restricted `s` is smaller than `ε` for all `i`.
* `MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the probability theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of measurable functions `f` is uniformly integrable in the
probability theory sense if it is uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and
has uniformly bounded Lp-norm.
# Main results
* `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite`: a finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly
integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae`: a sequence of Lp functions which is uniformly
integrable converges in Lp if they converge almost everywhere.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite`: Vitali convergence theorem:
a sequence of Lp functions converges in Lp if and only if it is uniformly integrable
and converges in measure.
## Tags
uniform integrable, uniformly absolutely continuous integral, Vitali convergence theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to be uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there exists
some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` with measure less than `δ`, the Lp-norm of `f i`
restricted on `s` is less than `ε`.
Uniform integrability is also known as uniformly absolutely continuous integrals. -/
def UnifIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃ε : ℝ⦄ (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ i s,
MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε
/-- In probability theory, a family of measurable functions is uniformly integrable if it is
uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and is uniformly bounded. -/
def UniformIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
(∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ∧ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ i, eLpNorm (f i) p μ ≤ C
namespace UniformIntegrable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ)
(i : ι) : AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ :=
hf.1 i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable := UniformIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem unifIntegrable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ :=
hf.2.1
protected theorem memLp {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) (i : ι) :
MemLp (f i) p μ :=
⟨hf.1 i,
let ⟨_, _, hC⟩ := hf.2
lt_of_le_of_lt (hC i) ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
end UniformIntegrable
section UnifIntegrable
/-! ### `UnifIntegrable`
This section deals with uniform integrability in the measure theory sense. -/
namespace UnifIntegrable
variable {f g : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
protected theorem add (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f + g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
have hε2 : 0 < ε / 2 := half_pos hε
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁_pos, hfδ₁⟩ := hf hε2
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂_pos, hgδ₂⟩ := hg hε2
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁_pos hδ₂_pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_add']
refine (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf_meas i).indicator hs) ((hg_meas i).indicator hs) hp).trans ?_
have hε_halves : ENNReal.ofReal ε = ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add hε2.le hε2.le, add_halves]
rw [hε_halves]
exact add_le_add (hfδ₁ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_left _ _))))
(hgδ₂ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_right _ _))))
protected theorem neg (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) : UnifIntegrable (-f) p μ := by
simp_rw [UnifIntegrable, Pi.neg_apply, Set.indicator_neg', eLpNorm_neg]
exact hf
protected theorem sub (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f - g) p μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg hp hf_meas fun i => (hg_meas i).neg
protected theorem ae_eq (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable g p μ := by
classical
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hfδ⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun n s hs hμs => (le_of_eq <| eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_).trans (hfδ n s hs hμs)⟩
filter_upwards [hfg n] with x hx
simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply, hx]
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the functions to a set. -/
protected theorem indicator (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable (fun i => E.indicator (f i)) p μ := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
calc
eLpNorm (s.indicator (E.indicator (f i))) p μ
= eLpNorm (E.indicator (s.indicator (f i))) p μ := by
simp only [indicator_indicator, inter_comm]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ := eLpNorm_indicator_le _
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hε _ _ hs hμs
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the measure to a set. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable f p (μ.restrict E) := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hδε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
rw [μ.restrict_apply hs, ← measure_toMeasurable] at hμs
calc
eLpNorm (indicator s (f i)) p (μ.restrict E) = eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (s ∩ E)) := by
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, μ.restrict_restrict hs]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E))) :=
eLpNorm_mono_measure _ <| Measure.restrict_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _) le_rfl
_ = eLpNorm (indicator (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E)) (f i)) p μ :=
(eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)).symm
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hδε i _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hμs
end UnifIntegrable
theorem unifIntegrable_zero_meas [MeasurableSpace α] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → β} :
UnifIntegrable f p (0 : Measure α) :=
fun ε _ => ⟨1, one_pos, fun i s _ _ => by simp⟩
theorem unifIntegrable_congr_ae {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f g : ι → α → β} (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔ UnifIntegrable g p μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.ae_eq hfg, fun hg => hg.ae_eq fun n => (hfg n).symm⟩
theorem tendsto_indicator_ge (f : α → β) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := Nat.ceil (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ) + 1) fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
simp only [not_le, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_ceil _) ?_
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) ?_
norm_cast
variable {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- This lemma is weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
as the latter provides `0 ≤ M` and does not require the measurability of `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have htendsto :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
univ_mem' (id fun x => tendsto_indicator_ge f x)
have hmeas : ∀ M : ℕ, AEStronglyMeasurable ({ x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ := by
intro M
apply hf.1.indicator
apply StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_le stronglyMeasurable_const
hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.stronglyMeasurable
have hbound : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ := by
rw [memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf
exact hf.norm.2
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖{ x | n ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f a - 0‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence hmeas hbound ?_ htendsto
refine fun n => univ_mem' (id fun x => ?_)
by_cases hx : (n : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖
· dsimp
rwa [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· dsimp
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, norm_zero]
· exact norm_nonneg _
· assumption
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at this
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := this (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.2 hε)
simp only [zero_tsub, zero_le, sub_zero, zero_add, coe_nnnorm,
Set.mem_Icc] at hM
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
convert hM M le_rfl
simp only [coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal (norm_nonneg _)]
rfl
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
which does not require measurability. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas (hf : MemLp f 1 μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε :=
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
⟨max M 0, le_max_right _ _, by simpa⟩
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hf_mk : MemLp (hf.1.mk f) 1 μ := (memLp_congr_ae hf.1.ae_eq_mk).mp hf
obtain ⟨M, hM_pos, hfM⟩ :=
hf_mk.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk hε
refine ⟨M, hM_pos, (le_of_eq ?_).trans hfM⟩
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp only [Set.indicator_apply, coe_nnnorm, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ENNReal.coe_inj, hx.symm]
theorem MemLp.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero (hf : MemLp f ∞ μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∃ M : ℝ, eLpNormEssSup ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ = 0 := by
have hbdd : eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ := hf.eLpNorm_lt_top
refine ⟨(eLpNorm f ∞ μ + 1).toReal, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNormEssSup_indicator_eq_eLpNormEssSup_restrict]
· have : μ.restrict { x : α | (eLpNorm f ⊤ μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } = 0 := by
simp only [coe_nnnorm, eLpNorm_exponent_top, Measure.restrict_eq_zero]
have : { x : α | (eLpNormEssSup f μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖ } ⊆
{ x : α | eLpNormEssSup f μ < ‖f x‖₊ } := by
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hx
rw [ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne]
· exact ENNReal.lt_add_right hbdd.ne one_ne_zero
· exact (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hbdd, ENNReal.one_lt_top⟩).ne
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine (measure_mono this).trans ?_
have hle := enorm_ae_le_eLpNormEssSup f μ
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_le] at hle
exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.2 hle
rw [this, eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe
/- This lemma is slightly weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le` as the
latter provides `0 < M`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ M : ℝ, eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hp_ne_zero : p = 0
· refine ⟨1, hp_ne_zero.symm ▸ ?_⟩
simp [eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_ne_top : p = ∞
· subst hp_ne_top
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero hmeas
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
simp only [eLpNorm_exponent_top, hM, zero_le]
obtain ⟨M, hM', hM⟩ := MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le
(μ := μ) (hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top) (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε p.toReal)
refine ⟨M ^ (1 / p.toReal), ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_one (ENNReal.ofReal ε)]
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul,
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos hε]
convert hM using 3 with x
rw [enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm]
have hiff : M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ ↔ M ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal‖₊ := by
rw [coe_nnnorm, coe_nnnorm, Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm,
← Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff hM' (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
(one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top), ← Real.rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm, Real.rpow_one]
by_cases hx : x ∈ { x : α | M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem, Real.enorm_of_nonneg (by positivity),
← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm]
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
· simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
/-- This lemma implies that a single function is uniformly integrable (in the probability sense). -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 < M ∧ eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
refine
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), le_trans (eLpNorm_mono fun x => ?_) hM⟩
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (fun x hx => ?_) (fun x => norm_nonneg (f x)) x
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx -- removing the `rw` breaks the proof!
exact (max_le_iff.1 hx).1
end
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound {f : α → β} (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {M : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ < M) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s →
μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hM : M ≤ 0
· refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ _ => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = 0)]
· simp [hε.le]
· ext x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
exact (lt_of_lt_of_le (hf x) hM).le
rw [not_le] at hM
refine ⟨(ε / M) ^ p.toReal, Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε hM) _, fun s hs hμ => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
have haebdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ M := by
filter_upwards
exact fun x => (hf x).le
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound haebdd) ?_
rw [Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl _) (Or.inl ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top)]
· rw [ENNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top)]
refine le_trans hμ ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε hM),
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top), ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos hM]
· simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne]
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le' (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ 2 * ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hMpos, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le hmeas hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ :=
eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound (f := { x | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f) hp_top hε (by
intro x
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, Set.indicator_apply]
· split_ifs with h
exacts [h, hMpos])
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = { x : α | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f + { x : α | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f)]
· rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le ?_ ?_ hp_one) ?_
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe))
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_lt hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe measurable_const))
· rw [two_mul]
refine add_le_add (le_trans (eLpNorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self) hM) ?_
rw [← eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact hδ s hs hμs
· ext x
by_cases hx : M ≤ ‖f x‖
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, add_zero] <;> simpa
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, Set.indicator_of_mem, zero_add] <;>
simpa using hx
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le` which does not require
measurability on `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_le' hp_one hp_top hmeas (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => le_trans (hδ s hs hμs) ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, (by norm_num : ENNReal.ofReal 2 = 2),
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel] <;>
norm_num
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hℒp := hf
obtain ⟨⟨f', hf', heq⟩, _⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hℒp.ae_eq heq).eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas hp_one hp_top hf' hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs using 1
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact eLpNorm_congr_ae heq.restrict
/-- A constant function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_const {g : α → β} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
UnifIntegrable (fun _ : ι => g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hgδ⟩ := hg.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp_ne_top hε
exact ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun _ => hgδ⟩
/-- A single function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := hι
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hf i).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun j s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun i => False.elim <| hι <| Nonempty.intro i⟩
/-- This lemma is less general than `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite` which applies to
all sequences indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_fin (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
revert f
induction' n with n h
· intro f hf
exact unifIntegrable_subsingleton hp_one hp_top hf
intro f hfLp ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := fun k => f k
have hgLp : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun i => hfLp i
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁pos, hδ₁⟩ := h hgLp hε
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂pos, hδ₂⟩ := (hfLp n).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁pos hδ₂pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hi : i.val < n
· rw [(_ : f i = g ⟨i.val, hi⟩)]
· exact hδ₁ _ s hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_left _ _)
· simp [g]
· rw [(_ : i = n)]
· exact hδ₂ _ hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_right _ _)
· have hi' := Fin.is_lt i
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi'
rw [not_lt] at hi
simp [← le_antisymm hi' hi]
/-- A finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_finite [Finite ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
intro ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := f ∘ hn.some.symm
have hg : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun _ => hf _
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp_one hp_top hg hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
specialize hδ (hn.some i) s hs hμs
simp_rw [g, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at hδ
assumption
end
theorem eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd (μ : Measure α)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
{f g : α → β} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ c) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator (f - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal c * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ x, ‖s.indicator (f - g) x‖ ≤ ‖s.indicator (fun _ => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Pi.sub_apply, ← dist_eq_norm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
exact hf x hx
· simp [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_mono this) ?_
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_const hs hp hp']
refine mul_le_mul_right' (le_of_eq ?_) _
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hg' : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero]
intro ε hε
by_cases h : ε < ∞; swap
· rw [not_lt, top_le_iff] at h
exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [h]⟩
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [hμ]⟩
have hε' : 0 < ε.toReal / 3 := div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos hε.ne' h.ne) (by norm_num)
have hdivp : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := by positivity
have hpow : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁, heLpNorm₁⟩ := hui hε'
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂, heLpNorm₂⟩ := hg'.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp' hε'
obtain ⟨t, htm, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' hf hg hfg (lt_min hδ₁ hδ₂)
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at ht₂
specialize ht₂ (ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
(div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos (gt_iff_lt.1 hε).ne.symm h.ne) (mul_pos (by norm_num) hpow))
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 ht₂; clear ht₂
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
rw [← t.indicator_self_add_compl (f n - g)]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le (((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm.compl).aestronglyMeasurable hp) ?_
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, Set.indicator_add' t, Set.indicator_neg']
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf n).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(hg.indicator htm).neg.aestronglyMeasurable hp) _) ?_
have hnf : eLpNorm (t.indicator (f n)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₁ n t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₁.le]
exact min_le_left _ _
have hng : eLpNorm (t.indicator g) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₂ t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₂.le]
exact min_le_right _ _
have hlt : eLpNorm (tᶜ.indicator (f n - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
specialize hN n hn
have : 0 ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)) := by positivity
have := eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd μ hp' htm.compl this fun x hx =>
(dist_comm (g x) (f n x) ▸ (hN x hx).le :
dist (f n x) (g x) ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
refine le_trans this ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, ← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (measure_lt_top μ tᶜ).ne,
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg hdivp, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul, mul_assoc]
· refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (mul_le_of_le_one_right hε'.le ?_)
rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div, div_le_one]
· refine Real.rpow_le_rpow ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
(ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).le ?_) hdivp
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_measureUnivNNReal]
exact measure_mono (Set.subset_univ _)
· exact Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
· positivity
have : ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) = ε / 3 := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (show (0 : ℝ) < 3 by norm_num), ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h.ne]
simp
rw [this] at hnf hng hlt
rw [eLpNorm_neg, ← ENNReal.add_thirds ε, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add_three hnf hng hlt
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ)
(hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ = eLpNorm ((hf n).mk (f n) - hg.1.mk g) p μ :=
fun n => eLpNorm_congr_ae ((hf n).ae_eq_mk.sub hg.1.ae_eq_mk)
simp_rw [this]
refine tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).stronglyMeasurable_mk)
hg.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk (hg.ae_eq hg.1.ae_eq_mk) (hui.ae_eq fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk) ?_
have h_ae_forall_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, f n x = (hf n).mk (f n) x := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk
filter_upwards [hfg, h_ae_forall_eq, hg.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx_tendsto hxf_eq hxg_eq
rw [← hxg_eq]
convert hx_tendsto using 1
ext1 n
exact (hxf_eq n).symm
variable {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at hf_tendsto
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hf_tendsto (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (by simpa)
let F : Fin N → α → β := fun n => f n
have hF : ∀ n, MemLp (F n) p μ := fun n => hf n
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, hδ₁⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp hp' hF hε
refine ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, fun n s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hn : n < N
· exact hδ₁ ⟨n, hn⟩ s hs hμs
· exact (eLpNorm_indicator_le _).trans (hN n (not_lt.1 hn))
/-- Convergence in Lp implies uniform integrability. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hg : MemLp g p μ) (hfg : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
have : f = (fun _ => g) + fun n => f n - g := by ext1 n; simp
rw [this]
refine UnifIntegrable.add ?_ ?_ hp (fun _ => hg.aestronglyMeasurable)
fun n => (hf n).1.sub hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact unifIntegrable_const hp hp' hg
· exact unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).sub hg) hfg
/-- Forward direction of Vitali's convergence theorem: if `f` is a sequence of uniformly integrable
functions that converge in measure to some function `g` in a finite measure space, then `f`
converge in Lp to `g`. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) : Tendsto (fun n ↦ eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_of_subseq_tendsto fun ns hns => ?_
obtain ⟨ms, _, hms'⟩ := TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae fun ε hε => (hfg ε hε).comp hns
exact ⟨ms,
tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae hp hp' (fun _ => hf _) hg (fun ε hε =>
let ⟨δ, hδ, hδ'⟩ := hui hε
⟨δ, hδ, fun i s hs hμs => hδ' _ s hs hμs⟩)
hms'⟩
/-- **Vitali's convergence theorem**: A sequence of functions `f` converges to `g` in Lp if and
only if it is uniformly integrable and converges to `g` in measure. -/
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h => tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).1) hg h.2 h.1, fun h =>
⟨tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_eLpNorm (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne.symm
(fun n => (hf n).aestronglyMeasurable) hg.aestronglyMeasurable h,
unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp hp hp' hf hg h⟩⟩
/-- This lemma is superseded by `unifIntegrable_of` which do not require `C` to be positive. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of' (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i))
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ C : ℝ≥0, 0 < C ∧
∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
have hpzero := (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne.symm
by_cases hμ : μ Set.univ = 0
· rw [Measure.measure_univ_eq_zero] at hμ
exact hμ.symm ▸ unifIntegrable_zero_meas
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨C, hCpos, hC⟩ := h (ε / 2) (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨(ε / (2 * C)) ^ ENNReal.toReal p,
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε (mul_pos two_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos))) _,
fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hμs' : μ s = 0
· rw [(eLpNorm_eq_zero_iff ((hf i).indicator hs).aestronglyMeasurable hpzero).2
(indicator_meas_zero hμs')]
norm_num
calc
eLpNorm (Set.indicator s (f i)) p μ ≤
eLpNorm (Set.indicator (s ∩ { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }) (f i)) p μ +
eLpNorm (Set.indicator (s ∩ { x | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }) (f i)) p μ := by
refine le_trans (Eq.le ?_) (eLpNorm_add_le
(StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
((hf i).indicator (hs.inter (stronglyMeasurable_const.measurableSet_le (hf i).nnnorm))))
(StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
((hf i).indicator (hs.inter ((hf i).nnnorm.measurableSet_lt stronglyMeasurable_const))))
hp)
congr
change _ = fun x => (s ∩ { x : α | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }).indicator (f i) x +
(s ∩ { x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }).indicator (f i) x
rw [← Set.indicator_union_of_disjoint]
· rw [← Set.inter_union_distrib_left, (by ext; simp [le_or_lt] :
{ x : α | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ } ∪ { x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C } = Set.univ),
Set.inter_univ]
· refine (Disjoint.inf_right' _ ?_).inf_left' _
rw [disjoint_iff_inf_le]
rintro x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx₁ hx₂
exact False.elim (hx₂.ne (eq_of_le_of_not_lt hx₁ (not_lt.2 hx₂.le)).symm)
_ ≤ eLpNorm (Set.indicator { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ } (f i)) p μ +
(C : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
refine add_le_add
(eLpNorm_mono fun x => norm_indicator_le_of_subset Set.inter_subset_right _ _) ?_
rw [← Set.indicator_indicator]
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
have : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖{ x : α | ‖f i x‖₊ < C }.indicator (f i) x‖ ≤ C := by
filter_upwards
simp_rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
exact Set.indicator_le' (fun x (hx : _ < _) => hx.le) fun _ _ => NNReal.coe_nonneg _
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound this) ?_
rw [mul_comm, Measure.restrict_apply' hs, Set.univ_inter, ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, one_div]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + C * ENNReal.ofReal (ε / (2 * C)) := by
refine add_le_add (hC i) (mul_le_mul_left' ?_ _)
rwa [one_div, ENNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hpzero hp'),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε (mul_pos two_pos (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos)))]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
refine add_le_add_left ?_ _
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), ← div_div,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (NNReal.coe_pos.2 hCpos).ne.symm]
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add (half_pos hε).le (half_pos hε).le, add_halves]
theorem unifIntegrable_of (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ)
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ C : ℝ≥0,
∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
set g : ι → α → β := fun i => (hf i).choose
refine
(unifIntegrable_of' hp hp' (fun i => (Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).1) fun ε hε => ?_).ae_eq
fun i => (Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).2.symm
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := h ε hε
have hCg : ∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖g i x‖₊ }.indicator (g i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
intro i
refine le_trans (le_of_eq <| eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_) (hC i)
filter_upwards [(Exists.choose_spec <| hf i).2] with x hx
by_cases hfx : x ∈ { x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hfx, Set.indicator_of_mem, hx]
rwa [Set.mem_setOf, hx] at hfx
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hfx, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
rwa [Set.mem_setOf, hx] at hfx
refine ⟨max C 1, lt_max_of_lt_right one_pos, fun i => le_trans (eLpNorm_mono fun x => ?_) (hCg i)⟩
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
exact Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset
(fun x hx => Set.mem_setOf_eq ▸ le_trans (le_max_left _ _) hx) (fun _ => norm_nonneg _) _
end UnifIntegrable
section UniformIntegrable
/-! `UniformIntegrable`
In probability theory, uniform integrability normally refers to the condition that a sequence
of function `(fₙ)` satisfies for all `ε > 0`, there exists some `C ≥ 0` such that
`∫ x in {|fₙ| ≥ C}, fₙ x ∂μ ≤ ε` for all `n`.
In this section, we will develop some API for `UniformIntegrable` and prove that
`UniformIntegrable` is equivalent to this definition of uniform integrability.
-/
variable {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → β}
theorem uniformIntegrable_zero_meas [MeasurableSpace α] : UniformIntegrable f p (0 : Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ => aestronglyMeasurable_zero_measure _, unifIntegrable_zero_meas, 0,
fun _ => eLpNorm_measure_zero.le⟩
theorem UniformIntegrable.ae_eq {g : ι → α → β} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) : UniformIntegrable g p μ := by
obtain ⟨hfm, hunif, C, hC⟩ := hf
refine ⟨fun i => (hfm i).congr (hfg i), (unifIntegrable_congr_ae hfg).1 hunif, C, fun i => ?_⟩
rw [← eLpNorm_congr_ae (hfg i)]
exact hC i
theorem uniformIntegrable_congr_ae {g : ι → α → β} (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UniformIntegrable f p μ ↔ UniformIntegrable g p μ :=
⟨fun h => h.ae_eq hfg, fun h => h.ae_eq fun i => (hfg i).symm⟩
/-- A finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly integrable in the probability sense. -/
theorem uniformIntegrable_finite [Finite ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UniformIntegrable f p μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype ι
refine ⟨fun n => (hf n).1, unifIntegrable_finite hp_one hp_top hf, ?_⟩
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
· choose _ hf using hf
set C := (Finset.univ.image fun i : ι => eLpNorm (f i) p μ).max'
⟨eLpNorm (f hι.some) p μ, Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨hι.some, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩⟩
refine ⟨C.toNNReal, fun i => ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.coe_toNNReal]
· exact Finset.le_max' (α := ℝ≥0∞) _ _ (Finset.mem_image.2 ⟨i, Finset.mem_univ _, rfl⟩)
· refine ne_of_lt ((Finset.max'_lt_iff _ _).2 fun y hy => ?_)
rw [Finset.mem_image] at hy
obtain ⟨i, -, rfl⟩ := hy
exact hf i
· exact ⟨0, fun i => False.elim <| hι <| Nonempty.intro i⟩
/-- A single function is uniformly integrable in the probability sense. -/
theorem uniformIntegrable_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UniformIntegrable f p μ :=
uniformIntegrable_finite hp_one hp_top hf
/-- A constant sequence of functions is uniformly integrable in the probability sense. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/UniformIntegrable.lean | 760 | 775 | theorem uniformIntegrable_const {g : α → β} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
UniformIntegrable (fun _ : ι => g) p μ :=
⟨fun _ => hg.1, unifIntegrable_const hp hp_ne_top hg,
⟨(eLpNorm g p μ).toNNReal, fun _ => le_of_eq (ENNReal.coe_toNNReal hg.2.ne).symm⟩⟩
/-- This lemma is superseded by `uniformIntegrable_of` which only requires
`AEStronglyMeasurable`. -/
theorem uniformIntegrable_of' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i))
(h : ∀ ε : ℝ, 0 < ε → ∃ C : ℝ≥0,
∀ i, eLpNorm ({ x | C ≤ ‖f i x‖₊ }.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε) :
UniformIntegrable f p μ := by | refine ⟨fun i => (hf i).aestronglyMeasurable,
unifIntegrable_of hp hp' (fun i => (hf i).aestronglyMeasurable) h, ?_⟩
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ := h 1 one_pos
refine ⟨((C : ℝ≥0∞) * μ Set.univ ^ p.toReal⁻¹ + 1).toNNReal, fun i => ?_⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anand Rao, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.CofilteredSystem
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Set
/-!
# Ends
This file contains a definition of the ends of a simple graph, as sections of the inverse system
assigning, to each finite set of vertices, the connected components of its complement.
-/
universe u
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V) (K L M : Set V)
namespace SimpleGraph
/-- The components outside a given set of vertices `K` -/
abbrev ComponentCompl :=
(G.induce Kᶜ).ConnectedComponent
variable {G} {K L M}
/-- The connected component of `v` in `G.induce Kᶜ`. -/
abbrev componentComplMk (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
connectedComponentMk (G.induce Kᶜ) ⟨v, vK⟩
/-- The set of vertices of `G` making up the connected component `C` -/
def ComponentCompl.supp (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Set V :=
{ v : V | ∃ h : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk h = C }
@[ext]
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_injective :
Function.Injective (ComponentCompl.supp : G.ComponentCompl K → Set V) := by
refine ConnectedComponent.ind₂ ?_
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ h
simp only [Set.ext_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ComponentCompl.supp] at h ⊢
exact ((h v).mp ⟨hv, Reachable.refl _⟩).choose_spec
theorem ComponentCompl.supp_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : C.supp = D.supp ↔ C = D :=
ComponentCompl.supp_injective.eq_iff
instance ComponentCompl.setLike : SetLike (G.ComponentCompl K) V where
coe := ComponentCompl.supp
coe_injective' _ _ := ComponentCompl.supp_inj.mp
@[simp]
theorem ComponentCompl.mem_supp_iff {v : V} {C : ComponentCompl G K} :
v ∈ C ↔ ∃ vK : v ∉ K, G.componentComplMk vK = C :=
Iff.rfl
theorem componentComplMk_mem (G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) : v ∈ G.componentComplMk vK :=
⟨vK, rfl⟩
theorem componentComplMk_eq_of_adj (G : SimpleGraph V) {v w : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (wK : w ∉ K)
(a : G.Adj v w) : G.componentComplMk vK = G.componentComplMk wK := by
rw [ConnectedComponent.eq]
apply Adj.reachable
exact a
/-- In an infinite graph, the set of components out of a finite set is nonempty. -/
instance componentCompl_nonempty_of_infinite (G : SimpleGraph V) [Infinite V] (K : Finset V) :
Nonempty (G.ComponentCompl K) :=
let ⟨_, kK⟩ := K.finite_toSet.infinite_compl.nonempty
⟨componentComplMk _ kK⟩
namespace ComponentCompl
/-- A `ComponentCompl` specialization of `Quot.lift`, where soundness has to be proved only
for adjacent vertices.
-/
protected def lift {β : Sort*} (f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (_ : v ∉ K), β)
(h : ∀ ⦃v w⦄ (hv : v ∉ K) (hw : w ∉ K), G.Adj v w → f hv = f hw) : G.ComponentCompl K → β :=
ConnectedComponent.lift (fun vv => f vv.prop) fun v w p => by
induction p with
| nil => rintro _; rfl
| cons a q ih => rename_i u v w; rintro h'; exact (h u.prop v.prop a).trans (ih h'.of_cons)
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind {β : G.ComponentCompl K → Prop}
(f : ∀ ⦃v⦄ (hv : v ∉ K), β (G.componentComplMk hv)) : ∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, β C := by
apply ConnectedComponent.ind
exact fun ⟨v, vnK⟩ => f vnK
/-- The induced graph on the vertices `C`. -/
protected abbrev coeGraph (C : ComponentCompl G K) : SimpleGraph C :=
G.induce (C : Set V)
theorem coe_inj {C D : G.ComponentCompl K} : (C : Set V) = (D : Set V) ↔ C = D :=
SetLike.coe_set_eq
@[simp]
protected theorem nonempty (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : (C : Set V).Nonempty :=
C.ind fun v vnK => ⟨v, vnK, rfl⟩
protected theorem exists_eq_mk (C : G.ComponentCompl K) :
∃ (v : _) (h : v ∉ K), G.componentComplMk h = C :=
C.nonempty
protected theorem disjoint_right (C : G.ComponentCompl K) : Disjoint K C := by
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun v ⟨vK, vC⟩ => vC.choose vK
theorem not_mem_of_mem {C : G.ComponentCompl K} {c : V} (cC : c ∈ C) : c ∉ K := fun cK =>
Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right ⟨cK, cC⟩
protected theorem pairwise_disjoint :
Pairwise fun C D : G.ComponentCompl K => Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rintro C D ne
rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
exact fun u ⟨uC, uD⟩ => ne (uC.choose_spec.symm.trans uD.choose_spec)
/-- Any vertex adjacent to a vertex of `C` and not lying in `K` must lie in `C`.
-/
theorem mem_of_adj : ∀ {C : G.ComponentCompl K} (c d : V), c ∈ C → d ∉ K → G.Adj c d → d ∈ C :=
fun {C} c d ⟨cnK, h⟩ dnK cd =>
⟨dnK, by
rw [← h, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact Adj.reachable cd.symm⟩
/--
Assuming `G` is preconnected and `K` not empty, given any connected component `C` outside of `K`,
there exists a vertex `k ∈ K` adjacent to a vertex `v ∈ C`.
-/
theorem exists_adj_boundary_pair (Gc : G.Preconnected) (hK : K.Nonempty) :
∀ C : G.ComponentCompl K, ∃ ck : V × V, ck.1 ∈ C ∧ ck.2 ∈ K ∧ G.Adj ck.1 ck.2 := by
refine ComponentCompl.ind fun v vnK => ?_
let C : G.ComponentCompl K := G.componentComplMk vnK
let dis := Set.disjoint_iff.mp C.disjoint_right
by_contra! h
suffices Set.univ = (C : Set V) by exact dis ⟨hK.choose_spec, this ▸ Set.mem_univ hK.some⟩
symm
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall]
rintro u
by_contra unC
obtain ⟨p⟩ := Gc v u
obtain ⟨⟨⟨x, y⟩, xy⟩, -, xC, ynC⟩ :=
p.exists_boundary_dart (C : Set V) (G.componentComplMk_mem vnK) unC
exact ynC (mem_of_adj x y xC (fun yK : y ∈ K => h ⟨x, y⟩ xC yK xy) xy)
/--
If `K ⊆ L`, the components outside of `L` are all contained in a single component outside of `K`.
-/
abbrev hom (h : K ⊆ L) (C : G.ComponentCompl L) : G.ComponentCompl K :=
C.map <| induceHom Hom.id <| Set.compl_subset_compl.2 h
theorem subset_hom (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) : (C : Set V) ⊆ (C.hom h : Set V) := by
rintro c ⟨cL, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fun h' => cL (h h'), rfl⟩
theorem _root_.SimpleGraph.componentComplMk_mem_hom
(G : SimpleGraph V) {v : V} (vK : v ∉ K) (h : L ⊆ K) :
v ∈ (G.componentComplMk vK).hom h :=
subset_hom (G.componentComplMk vK) h (G.componentComplMk_mem vK)
theorem hom_eq_iff_le (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ (C : Set V) ⊆ (D : Set V) :=
⟨fun h' => h' ▸ C.subset_hom h, C.ind fun _ vnL vD => (vD ⟨vnL, rfl⟩).choose_spec⟩
theorem hom_eq_iff_not_disjoint (C : G.ComponentCompl L) (h : K ⊆ L) (D : G.ComponentCompl K) :
C.hom h = D ↔ ¬Disjoint (C : Set V) (D : Set V) := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff]
constructor
· rintro rfl
refine C.ind fun x xnL => ?_
exact ⟨x, ⟨xnL, rfl⟩, ⟨fun xK => xnL (h xK), rfl⟩⟩
· refine C.ind fun x xnL => ?_
rintro ⟨x, ⟨_, e₁⟩, _, rfl⟩
rw [← e₁]
rfl
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Ends/Defs.lean | 178 | 180 | theorem hom_refl (C : G.ComponentCompl L) : C.hom (subset_refl L) = C := by | change C.map _ = C
rw [induceHom_id G Lᶜ, ConnectedComponent.map_id] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yuma Mizuno. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yuma Mizuno
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.NatIso
/-!
# Bicategories
In this file we define typeclass for bicategories.
A bicategory `B` consists of
* objects `a : B`,
* 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`, and
* 2-morphisms `η : f ⟶ g` between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` between objects `a b : B`.
We use `u`, `v`, and `w` as the universe variables for objects, 1-morphisms, and 2-morphisms,
respectively.
A typeclass for bicategories extends `CategoryTheory.CategoryStruct` typeclass. This means that
we have
* a composition `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c` for each 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c`, and
* an identity `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a` for each object `a : B`.
For each object `a b : B`, the collection of 1-morphisms `a ⟶ b` has a category structure. The
2-morphisms in the bicategory are implemented as the morphisms in this family of categories.
The composition of 1-morphisms is in fact an object part of a functor
`(a ⟶ b) ⥤ (b ⟶ c) ⥤ (a ⟶ c)`. The definition of bicategories in this file does not
require this functor directly. Instead, it requires the whiskering functions. For a 1-morphism
`f : a ⟶ b` and a 2-morphism `η : g ⟶ h` between 1-morphisms `g h : b ⟶ c`, there is a
2-morphism `whiskerLeft f η : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h`. Similarly, for a 2-morphism `η : f ⟶ g`
between 1-morphisms `f g : a ⟶ b` and a 1-morphism `f : b ⟶ c`, there is a 2-morphism
`whiskerRight η h : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h`. These satisfy the exchange law
`whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ`,
which is required as an axiom in the definition here.
-/
namespace CategoryTheory
universe w v u
open Category Iso
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- In a bicategory, we can compose the 1-morphisms `f : a ⟶ b` and `g : b ⟶ c` to obtain
a 1-morphism `f ≫ g : a ⟶ c`. This composition does not need to be strictly associative,
but there is a specified associator, `α_ f g h : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ (g ≫ h)`.
There is an identity 1-morphism `𝟙 a : a ⟶ a`, with specified left and right unitor
isomorphisms `λ_ f : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` and `ρ_ f : f ≫ 𝟙 a ≅ f`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations.
See https://ncatlab.org/nlab/show/bicategory.
-/
@[nolint checkUnivs]
class Bicategory (B : Type u) extends CategoryStruct.{v} B where
/-- The category structure on the collection of 1-morphisms -/
homCategory : ∀ a b : B, Category.{w} (a ⟶ b) := by infer_instance
/-- Left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft {a b c : B} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) : f ≫ g ⟶ f ≫ h
/-- Right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {a b c : B} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ⟶ g ≫ h
/-- The associator isomorphism: `(f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h` -/
associator {a b c d : B} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) : (f ≫ g) ≫ h ≅ f ≫ g ≫ h
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f` -/
leftUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : 𝟙 a ≫ f ≅ f
/-- The right unitor: `f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f` -/
rightUnitor {a b : B} (f : a ⟶ b) : f ≫ 𝟙 b ≅ f
-- axioms for left whiskering:
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerLeft f (𝟙 g) = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_comp :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) {g h i : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f (η ≫ θ) = whiskerLeft f η ≫ whiskerLeft f θ := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerLeft (𝟙 a) η = (leftUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (leftUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerLeft :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h'),
whiskerLeft (f ≫ g) η =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerLeft g η) ≫ (associator f g h').inv := by
aesop_cat
-- axioms for right whiskering:
id_whiskerRight : ∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c), whiskerRight (𝟙 f) g = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by
aesop_cat
comp_whiskerRight :
∀ {a b c} {f g h : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : g ⟶ h) (i : b ⟶ c),
whiskerRight (η ≫ θ) i = whiskerRight η i ≫ whiskerRight θ i := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_id :
∀ {a b} {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g),
whiskerRight η (𝟙 b) = (rightUnitor f).hom ≫ η ≫ (rightUnitor g).inv := by
aesop_cat
whiskerRight_comp :
∀ {a b c d} {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight η (g ≫ h) =
(associator f g h).inv ≫ whiskerRight (whiskerRight η g) h ≫ (associator f' g h).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- associativity of whiskerings:
whisker_assoc :
∀ {a b c d} (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d),
whiskerRight (whiskerLeft f η) h =
(associator f g h).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (whiskerRight η h) ≫ (associator f g' h).inv := by
aesop_cat
-- exchange law of left and right whiskerings:
whisker_exchange :
∀ {a b c} {f g : a ⟶ b} {h i : b ⟶ c} (η : f ⟶ g) (θ : h ⟶ i),
whiskerLeft f θ ≫ whiskerRight η i = whiskerRight η h ≫ whiskerLeft g θ := by
aesop_cat
-- pentagon identity:
pentagon :
∀ {a b c d e} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e),
whiskerRight (associator f g h).hom i ≫
(associator f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (associator g h i).hom =
(associator (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (associator f g (h ≫ i)).hom := by
aesop_cat
-- triangle identity:
triangle :
∀ {a b c} (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c),
(associator f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ whiskerLeft f (leftUnitor g).hom
= whiskerRight (rightUnitor f).hom g := by
aesop_cat
namespace Bicategory
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => Bicategory.whiskerLeft
@[inherit_doc] scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => Bicategory.whiskerRight
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "α_" => Bicategory.associator
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "λ_" => Bicategory.leftUnitor
@[inherit_doc] scoped notation "ρ_" => Bicategory.rightUnitor
/-!
### Simp-normal form for 2-morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any 2-morphisms into simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is also useful when applying (forthcoming)
`coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of 2-morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of 2-morphisms like `η₁ ≫ η₂ ≫ η₃ ≫ η₄ ≫ η₅` such that each `ηᵢ` is
either a structural 2-morphisms (2-morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural 2-morphisms, and
2. each non-structural 2-morphism in the composition is of the form `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅`,
where each `fᵢ` is a 1-morphism that is not the identity or a composite and `η` is a
non-structural 2-morphisms that is also not the identity or a composite.
Note that `f₁ ◁ f₂ ◁ f₃ ◁ η ▷ f₄ ▷ f₅` is actually `f₁ ◁ (f₂ ◁ (f₃ ◁ ((η ▷ f₄) ▷ f₅)))`.
-/
attribute [instance] homCategory
attribute [reassoc]
whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerRight whiskerRight_id
whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc whisker_exchange
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] pentagon triangle
/-
The following simp attributes are put in order to rewrite any 2-morphisms into normal forms. There
are associators and unitors in the RHS in the several simp lemmas here (e.g. `id_whiskerLeft`),
which at first glance look more complicated than the LHS, but they will be eventually reduced by
the pentagon or the triangle identities, and more generally, (forthcoming) `coherence` tactic.
-/
attribute [simp]
whiskerLeft_id whiskerLeft_comp id_whiskerLeft comp_whiskerLeft id_whiskerRight comp_whiskerRight
whiskerRight_id whiskerRight_comp whisker_assoc
variable {B : Type u} [Bicategory.{w, v} B] {a b c d e : B}
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.hom ≫ f ◁ η.inv = 𝟙 (f ≫ g) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.hom ▷ h ≫ η.inv ▷ h = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) :
f ◁ η.inv ≫ f ◁ η.hom = 𝟙 (f ≫ h) := by rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) :
η.inv ▷ h ≫ η.hom ▷ h = 𝟙 (g ≫ h) := by rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ≅ h) : f ≫ g ≅ f ≫ h where
hom := f ◁ η.hom
inv := f ◁ η.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] : IsIso (f ◁ η) :=
(whiskerLeftIso f (asIso η)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (f : a ⟶ b) {g h : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ h) [IsIso η] :
inv (f ◁ η) = f ◁ inv η := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← whiskerLeft_comp, whiskerLeft_id, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
/-- The right whiskering of a 2-isomorphism is a 2-isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ≅ g) (h : b ⟶ c) : f ≫ h ≅ g ≫ h where
hom := η.hom ▷ h
inv := η.inv ▷ h
instance whiskerRight_isIso {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] : IsIso (η ▷ h) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso η) h).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) (h : b ⟶ c) [IsIso η] :
inv (η ▷ h) = inv η ▷ h := by
apply IsIso.inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp only [← comp_whiskerRight, id_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom =
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).inv ▷ i := by
simp [← cancel_epi (f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv =
(α_ f g h).hom ▷ i ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv =
(α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ f g h).inv ▷ i)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv =
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g h).inv ▷ i ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).hom ≫ (α_ f g (h ≫ i)).hom =
(α_ f (g ≫ h) i).hom ≫ f ◁ (α_ g h i).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ f g h).hom ▷ i)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) (i : d ⟶ e) :
(α_ f g (h ≫ i)).inv ≫ (α_ (f ≫ g) h i).inv ≫ (α_ f g h).hom ▷ i =
f ◁ (α_ g h i).inv ≫ (α_ f (g ≫ h) i).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom ≫ f ◁ (λ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g :=
triangle f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv ≫ (ρ_ f).hom ▷ g = f ◁ (λ_ g).hom := by rw [← triangle, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
(ρ_ f).inv ▷ g ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).hom = f ◁ (λ_ g).inv := by
simp [← cancel_mono (f ◁ (λ_ g).hom)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem triangle_assoc_comp_left_inv (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) :
f ◁ (λ_ g).inv ≫ (α_ f (𝟙 b) g).inv = (ρ_ f).inv ▷ g := by
simp [← cancel_mono ((ρ_ f).hom ▷ g)]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h ≫ (α_ f' g h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ η ▷ g ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_comp_symm {f f' : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ f') (g : b ⟶ c) (h : c ⟶ d) :
η ▷ g ▷ h = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ η ▷ (g ≫ h) ≫ (α_ f' g h).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
(f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ η ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (f : a ⟶ b) {g g' : b ⟶ c} (η : g ⟶ g') (h : c ⟶ d) :
f ◁ η ▷ h = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ◁ η) ▷ h ≫ (α_ f g' h).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
(f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom = (α_ f g h).hom ≫ f ◁ g ◁ η := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').inv = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem comp_whiskerLeft_symm (f : a ⟶ b) (g : b ⟶ c) {h h' : c ⟶ d} (η : h ⟶ h') :
f ◁ g ◁ η = (α_ f g h).inv ≫ (f ≫ g) ◁ η ≫ (α_ f g h').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom = (λ_ f).hom ≫ η := by
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ≫ (λ_ g).inv = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η := by simp
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) : η = (λ_ f).inv ≫ 𝟙 a ◁ η ≫ (λ_ g).hom := by
simp
@[reassoc]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Bicategory/Basic.lean | 344 | 345 | theorem rightUnitor_naturality {f g : a ⟶ b} (η : f ⟶ g) :
η ▷ 𝟙 b ≫ (ρ_ g).hom = (ρ_ f).hom ≫ η := by | simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GCDMonoid.IntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.FieldTheory.Minpoly.IsIntegrallyClosed
import Mathlib.RingTheory.RootsOfUnity.PrimitiveRoots
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Nat
/-!
# Minimal polynomial of roots of unity
We gather several results about minimal polynomial of root of unity.
## Main results
* `IsPrimitiveRoot.totient_le_degree_minpoly`: The degree of the minimal polynomial of an `n`-th
primitive root of unity is at least `totient n`.
-/
open minpoly Polynomial
open scoped Polynomial
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CommRing
variable {n : ℕ} {K : Type*} [CommRing K] {μ : K} (h : IsPrimitiveRoot μ n)
include h
/-- `μ` is integral over `ℤ`. -/
-- Porting note: `hpos` was in the `variable` line, with an `omit` in mathlib3 just after this
-- declaration. For some reason, in Lean4, `hpos` gets included also in the declarations below,
-- even if it is not used in the proof.
theorem isIntegral (hpos : 0 < n) : IsIntegral ℤ μ := by
use X ^ n - 1
constructor
· exact monic_X_pow_sub_C 1 (ne_of_lt hpos).symm
· simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, eval₂_one, eval₂_X_pow, eval₂_sub,
sub_self]
section IsDomain
variable [IsDomain K] [CharZero K]
/-- The minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` divides `X ^ n - 1`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one : minpoly ℤ μ ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | h0)
· simp
apply minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (isIntegral h h0)
simp only [((IsPrimitiveRoot.iff_def μ n).mp h).left, aeval_X_pow, eq_intCast, Int.cast_one,
aeval_one, map_sub, sub_self]
/-- The reduction modulo `p` of the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` is separable. -/
theorem separable_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Separable (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) := by
have hdvd : map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
convert RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
(minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one h)
simp only [map_sub, map_pow, coe_mapRingHom, map_X, map_one]
refine Separable.of_dvd (separable_X_pow_sub_C 1 ?_ one_ne_zero) hdvd
by_contra hzero
exact hdiv ((ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd n p).1 hzero)
/-- The reduction modulo `p` of the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` is squarefree. -/
theorem squarefree_minpoly_mod {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
Squarefree (map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ)) :=
(separable_minpoly_mod h hdiv).squarefree
/-- Let `P` be the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` and `Q` be the minimal polynomial of
`μ ^ p`, where `p` is a natural number that does not divide `n`. Then `P` divides `expand ℤ p Q`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_expand {p : ℕ} (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
minpoly ℤ μ ∣ expand ℤ p (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) := by
rcases n.eq_zero_or_pos with (rfl | hpos)
· simp_all
letI : IsIntegrallyClosed ℤ := GCDMonoid.toIsIntegrallyClosed
refine minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_dvd (h.isIntegral hpos) ?_
rw [aeval_def, coe_expand, ← comp, eval₂_eq_eval_map, map_comp, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X,
eval_comp, eval_pow, eval_X, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, ← aeval_def]
exact minpoly.aeval _ _
/-- Let `P` be the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` and `Q` be the minimal polynomial of
`μ ^ p`, where `p` is a prime that does not divide `n`. Then `P` divides `Q ^ p` modulo `p`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_pow_mod {p : ℕ} [hprime : Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) ^ p := by
set Q := minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)
have hfrob :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) Q ^ p = map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (expand ℤ p Q) := by
rw [← ZMod.expand_card, map_expand]
rw [hfrob]
apply RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)))
exact minpoly_dvd_expand h hdiv
/-- Let `P` be the minimal polynomial of a root of unity `μ` and `Q` be the minimal polynomial of
`μ ^ p`, where `p` is a prime that does not divide `n`. Then `P` divides `Q` modulo `p`. -/
theorem minpoly_dvd_mod_p {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ μ) ∣
map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) (minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)) :=
(squarefree_minpoly_mod h hdiv).isRadical _ _ (minpoly_dvd_pow_mod h hdiv)
/-- If `p` is a prime that does not divide `n`,
then the minimal polynomials of a primitive `n`-th root of unity `μ`
and of `μ ^ p` are the same. -/
theorem minpoly_eq_pow {p : ℕ} [hprime : Fact p.Prime] (hdiv : ¬p ∣ n) :
minpoly ℤ μ = minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p) := by
classical
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp_all
have hpos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
by_contra hdiff
set P := minpoly ℤ μ
set Q := minpoly ℤ (μ ^ p)
have Pmonic : P.Monic := minpoly.monic (h.isIntegral hpos)
have Qmonic : Q.Monic := minpoly.monic ((h.pow_of_prime hprime.1 hdiv).isIntegral hpos)
have Pirr : Irreducible P := minpoly.irreducible (h.isIntegral hpos)
have Qirr : Irreducible Q := minpoly.irreducible ((h.pow_of_prime hprime.1 hdiv).isIntegral hpos)
have PQprim : IsPrimitive (P * Q) := Pmonic.isPrimitive.mul Qmonic.isPrimitive
have prod : P * Q ∣ X ^ n - 1 := by
rw [IsPrimitive.Int.dvd_iff_map_cast_dvd_map_cast (P * Q) (X ^ n - 1) PQprim
(monic_X_pow_sub_C (1 : ℤ) (ne_of_gt hpos)).isPrimitive,
Polynomial.map_mul]
refine IsCoprime.mul_dvd ?_ ?_ ?_
· have aux := IsPrimitive.Int.irreducible_iff_irreducible_map_cast Pmonic.isPrimitive
refine (dvd_or_isCoprime _ _ (aux.1 Pirr)).resolve_left ?_
rw [map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Pmonic]
intro hdiv
refine hdiff (eq_of_monic_of_associated Pmonic Qmonic ?_)
exact associated_of_dvd_dvd hdiv (Pirr.dvd_symm Qirr hdiv)
· apply (map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Pmonic).2
exact minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one h
· apply (map_dvd_map (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective Qmonic).2
exact minpoly_dvd_x_pow_sub_one (pow_of_prime h hprime.1 hdiv)
replace prod := RingHom.map_dvd (mapRingHom (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p))) prod
rw [coe_mapRingHom, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_sub, Polynomial.map_one,
Polynomial.map_pow, map_X] at prod
obtain ⟨R, hR⟩ := minpoly_dvd_mod_p h hdiv
rw [hR, ← mul_assoc, ← Polynomial.map_mul, ← sq, Polynomial.map_pow] at prod
have habs : map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P ^ 2 ∣ map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P ^ 2 * R := by
use R
replace habs :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (Nat.cast_lt.2 one_lt_two)
(le_emultiplicity_of_pow_dvd (dvd_trans habs prod))
have hfree : Squarefree (X ^ n - 1 : (ZMod p)[X]) :=
(separable_X_pow_sub_C 1 (fun h => hdiv <| (ZMod.natCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd n p).1 h)
one_ne_zero).squarefree
rcases (squarefree_iff_emultiplicity_le_one (X ^ n - 1)).1 hfree
(map (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) P) with hle | hunit
· rw [Nat.cast_one] at habs; exact hle.not_lt habs
· replace hunit := degree_eq_zero_of_isUnit hunit
rw [degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero (Int.castRingHom (ZMod p)) _] at hunit
· exact (minpoly.degree_pos (isIntegral h hpos)).ne' hunit
simp only [Pmonic, eq_intCast, Monic.leadingCoeff, Int.cast_one, Ne, not_false_iff,
one_ne_zero]
/-- If `m : ℕ` is coprime with `n`,
then the minimal polynomials of a primitive `n`-th root of unity `μ`
and of `μ ^ m` are the same. -/
theorem minpoly_eq_pow_coprime {m : ℕ} (hcop : Nat.Coprime m n) :
minpoly ℤ μ = minpoly ℤ (μ ^ m) := by
revert n hcop
refine UniqueFactorizationMonoid.induction_on_prime m ?_ ?_ ?_
· intro h hn
congr
simpa [(Nat.coprime_zero_left _).mp hn] using h
· intro u hunit _ _
congr
simp [Nat.isUnit_iff.mp hunit]
· intro a p _ hprime
intro hind h hcop
rw [hind h (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_left hcop)]; clear hind
replace hprime := hprime.nat_prime
have hdiv := (Nat.Prime.coprime_iff_not_dvd hprime).1 (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_right hcop)
haveI := Fact.mk hprime
rw [minpoly_eq_pow (h.pow_of_coprime a (Nat.Coprime.coprime_mul_left hcop)) hdiv]
congr 1
ring
/-- If `m : ℕ` is coprime with `n`,
then the minimal polynomial of a primitive `n`-th root of unity `μ`
has `μ ^ m` as root. -/
theorem pow_isRoot_minpoly {m : ℕ} (hcop : Nat.Coprime m n) :
IsRoot (map (Int.castRingHom K) (minpoly ℤ μ)) (μ ^ m) := by
simp only [minpoly_eq_pow_coprime h hcop, IsRoot.def, eval_map]
exact minpoly.aeval ℤ (μ ^ m)
/-- `primitiveRoots n K` is a subset of the roots of the minimal polynomial of a primitive
`n`-th root of unity `μ`. -/
theorem is_roots_of_minpoly [DecidableEq K] :
primitiveRoots n K ⊆ (map (Int.castRingHom K) (minpoly ℤ μ)).roots.toFinset := by
by_cases hn : n = 0; · simp_all
have : NeZero n := ⟨hn⟩
have hpos := Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn
intro x hx
obtain ⟨m, _, hcop, rfl⟩ := (isPrimitiveRoot_iff h).1 ((mem_primitiveRoots hpos).1 hx)
simp only [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots]
convert pow_isRoot_minpoly h hcop using 0
rw [← mem_roots]
exact map_monic_ne_zero <| minpoly.monic <| isIntegral h hpos
/-- The degree of the minimal polynomial of `μ` is at least `totient n`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/RootsOfUnity/Minpoly.lean | 207 | 216 | theorem totient_le_degree_minpoly : Nat.totient n ≤ (minpoly ℤ μ).natDegree := by | classical
let P : ℤ[X] := minpoly ℤ μ
-- minimal polynomial of `μ`
let P_K : K[X] := map (Int.castRingHom K) P
-- minimal polynomial of `μ` sent to `K[X]`
calc
n.totient = (primitiveRoots n K).card := h.card_primitiveRoots.symm
_ ≤ P_K.roots.toFinset.card := Finset.card_le_card (is_roots_of_minpoly h)
_ ≤ Multiset.card P_K.roots := Multiset.toFinset_card_le _ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Jalex Stark. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jalex Stark, Kim Morrison, Eric Wieser, Oliver Nash, Wen Yang
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.Basic
/-!
# Matrices with a single non-zero element.
This file provides `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix`. The matrix `Matrix.stdBasisMatrix i j c` has `c`
at position `(i, j)`, and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
assert_not_exists Matrix.trace
variable {l m n o : Type*}
variable {R α β : Type*}
namespace Matrix
variable [DecidableEq l] [DecidableEq m] [DecidableEq n] [DecidableEq o]
section Zero
variable [Zero α]
/-- `stdBasisMatrix i j a` is the matrix with `a` in the `i`-th row, `j`-th column,
and zeroes elsewhere.
-/
def stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) : Matrix m n α :=
of <| fun i' j' => if i = i' ∧ j = j' then a else 0
theorem stdBasisMatrix_eq_of_single_single (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j a = Matrix.of (Pi.single i (Pi.single j a)) := by
ext a b
unfold stdBasisMatrix
by_cases hi : i = a <;> by_cases hj : j = b <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem of_symm_stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
of.symm (stdBasisMatrix i j a) = Pi.single i (Pi.single j a) :=
congr_arg of.symm <| stdBasisMatrix_eq_of_single_single i j a
@[simp]
theorem smul_stdBasisMatrix [SMulZeroClass R α] (r : R) (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
r • stdBasisMatrix i j a = stdBasisMatrix i j (r • a) := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp [smul_ite]
@[simp]
theorem stdBasisMatrix_zero (i : m) (j : n) : stdBasisMatrix i j (0 : α) = 0 := by
unfold stdBasisMatrix
ext
simp
@[simp]
lemma transpose_stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j a)ᵀ = stdBasisMatrix j i a := by
aesop (add unsafe unfold stdBasisMatrix)
@[simp]
lemma map_stdBasisMatrix (i : m) (j : n) (a : α) {β : Type*} [Zero β]
{F : Type*} [FunLike F α β] [ZeroHomClass F α β] (f : F) :
(stdBasisMatrix i j a).map f = stdBasisMatrix i j (f a) := by
aesop (add unsafe unfold stdBasisMatrix)
end Zero
theorem stdBasisMatrix_add [AddZeroClass α] (i : m) (j : n) (a b : α) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (a + b) = stdBasisMatrix i j a + stdBasisMatrix i j b := by
ext
simp only [stdBasisMatrix, of_apply]
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
theorem mulVec_stdBasisMatrix [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α] [Fintype m]
(i : n) (j : m) (c : α) (x : m → α) :
mulVec (stdBasisMatrix i j c) x = Function.update (0 : n → α) i (c * x j) := by
ext i'
simp [stdBasisMatrix, mulVec, dotProduct]
rcases eq_or_ne i i' with rfl|h
· simp
simp [h, h.symm]
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Basis.lean | 85 | 94 | theorem matrix_eq_sum_stdBasisMatrix [AddCommMonoid α] [Fintype m] [Fintype n] (x : Matrix m n α) :
x = ∑ i : m, ∑ j : n, stdBasisMatrix i j (x i j) := by | ext i j
rw [← Fintype.sum_prod_type']
simp [stdBasisMatrix, Matrix.sum_apply, Matrix.of_apply, ← Prod.mk_inj]
theorem stdBasisMatrix_eq_single_vecMulVec_single [MulZeroOneClass α] (i : m) (j : n) :
stdBasisMatrix i j (1 : α) = vecMulVec (Pi.single i 1) (Pi.single j 1) := by
ext i' j'
simp [-mul_ite, stdBasisMatrix, vecMulVec, ite_and, Pi.single_apply, eq_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid on `M.E` which a set `B ⊆ M.E` is a base if and only if
`M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_isBase.imp (fun _ hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I' ⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
obtain rfl : I = B' \ X := hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB'.indep.diff _)
(subset_diff.2 ⟨hIB', (subset_diff.1 hI.subset).2⟩)
(diff_subset_diff_left hB'.subset_ground)
simp_rw [maximal_subset_iff']
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E, ?_, ⟨⟨inter_subset_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [subset_inter_iff, and_iff_left hI'E, subset_diff, and_iff_right hI'X]
exact Disjoint.mono_right hB'IB <| disjoint_union_right.2
⟨disjoint_sdiff_right.mono_left hI'X , hI'B⟩
· exact ⟨B', hB', (disjoint_sdiff_left (t := X)).mono_left inter_subset_left⟩
· exact inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset
simp only [subset_inter_iff, subset_diff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine fun J hJE B'' hB'' hdj hJX hXJ ↦ ⟨⟨hJX, ?_⟩, hJE⟩
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset, ← union_diff_cancel hJX,
inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, empty_union, diff_eq, ← inter_assoc,
← diff_eq, diff_subset_comm, diff_eq, inter_assoc, ← diff_eq, inter_comm]
exact subset_trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ hB''.subset_ground) hXJ
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
obtain rfl : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩ ?_
exact hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he (subset_union_right.trans hI'B₁))
by_contra hdj'
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hdj'
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues.) -/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 127 | 129 | theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.IsBase B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by | simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff, |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not]
theorem xor_iff_or_and_not_and (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b ↔ (a ∨ b) ∧ (¬ (a ∧ b)) := by
rw [Xor', or_and_right, not_and_or, and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, false_or,
and_or_left, and_not_self_iff, or_false]
end Propositional
/-! ### Membership -/
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem
alias Membership.mem.ne_of_not_mem' := ne_of_mem_of_not_mem'
section Membership
variable {α β : Type*} [Membership α β] {p : Prop} [Decidable p]
theorem mem_dite {a : α} {s : p → β} {t : ¬p → β} :
(a ∈ if h : p then s h else t h) ↔ (∀ h, a ∈ s h) ∧ (∀ h, a ∈ t h) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem dite_mem {a : p → α} {b : ¬p → α} {s : β} :
(if h : p then a h else b h) ∈ s ↔ (∀ h, a h ∈ s) ∧ (∀ h, b h ∈ s) := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h]
theorem mem_ite {a : α} {s t : β} : (a ∈ if p then s else t) ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → a ∈ t) :=
mem_dite
theorem ite_mem {a b : α} {s : β} : (if p then a else b) ∈ s ↔ (p → a ∈ s) ∧ (¬p → b ∈ s) :=
dite_mem
end Membership
/-! ### Declarations about equality -/
section Equality
-- todo: change name
theorem forall_cond_comm {α} {s : α → Prop} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a, s a → ∀ b, s b → p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, s a → s b → p a b :=
⟨fun h a b ha hb ↦ h a ha b hb, fun h a ha b hb ↦ h a b ha hb⟩
theorem forall_mem_comm {α β} [Membership α β] {s : β} {p : α → α → Prop} :
(∀ a (_ : a ∈ s) b (_ : b ∈ s), p a b) ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → p a b :=
forall_cond_comm
lemma ne_of_eq_of_ne {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a = b) (h₂ : b ≠ c) : a ≠ c := h₁.symm ▸ h₂
lemma ne_of_ne_of_eq {α : Sort*} {a b c : α} (h₁ : a ≠ b) (h₂ : b = c) : a ≠ c := h₂ ▸ h₁
alias Eq.trans_ne := ne_of_eq_of_ne
alias Ne.trans_eq := ne_of_ne_of_eq
theorem eq_equivalence {α : Sort*} : Equivalence (@Eq α) :=
⟨Eq.refl, @Eq.symm _, @Eq.trans _⟩
-- These were migrated to Batteries but the `@[simp]` attributes were (mysteriously?) removed.
attribute [simp] eq_mp_eq_cast eq_mpr_eq_cast
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_left {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) {a b : α} (h : a = b) :
congr (Eq.refl f) h = congr_arg f h := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_refl_right {α β : Sort*} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) (a : α) :
congr h (Eq.refl a) = congr_fun h a := rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_arg_refl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) :
congr_arg f (Eq.refl a) = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_rfl {α β : Sort*} (f : α → β) (a : α) : congr_fun (Eq.refl f) a = Eq.refl (f a) :=
rfl
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem congr_fun_congr_arg {α β γ : Sort*} (f : α → β → γ) {a a' : α} (p : a = a') (b : β) :
congr_fun (congr_arg f p) b = congr_arg (fun a ↦ f a b) p := rfl
theorem Eq.rec_eq_cast {α : Sort _} {P : α → Sort _} {x y : α} (h : x = y) (z : P x) :
h ▸ z = cast (congr_arg P h) z := by induction h; rfl
theorem eqRec_heq' {α : Sort*} {a' : α} {motive : (a : α) → a' = a → Sort*}
(p : motive a' (rfl : a' = a')) {a : α} (t : a' = a) :
HEq (@Eq.rec α a' motive p a t) p := by
subst t; rfl
theorem rec_heq_of_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β}
(e : a = b) (h : HEq x y) : HEq (e ▸ x) y := by subst e; exact h
theorem rec_heq_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : C a} {y : β} {e : a = b} :
HEq (e ▸ x) y ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
theorem heq_rec_iff_heq {α β : Sort _} {a b : α} {C : α → Sort*} {x : β} {y : C a} {e : a = b} :
HEq x (e ▸ y) ↔ HEq x y := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_heq_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : α = β) (a : α) (c : γ) :
HEq (cast e a) c ↔ HEq a c := by subst e; rfl
@[simp]
theorem heq_cast_iff_heq {α β γ : Sort _} (e : β = γ) (a : α) (b : β) :
HEq a (cast e b) ↔ HEq a b := by subst e; rfl
universe u
variable {α β : Sort u} {e : β = α} {a : α} {b : β}
lemma heq_of_eq_cast (e : β = α) : a = cast e b → HEq a b := by rintro rfl; simp
lemma eq_cast_iff_heq : a = cast e b ↔ HEq a b := ⟨heq_of_eq_cast _, fun h ↦ by cases h; rfl⟩
end Equality
/-! ### Declarations about quantifiers -/
section Quantifiers
section Dependent
variable {α : Sort*} {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*}
theorem forall₂_imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∀ a b, p a b) → ∀ a b, q a b :=
forall_imp fun i ↦ forall_imp <| h i
theorem forall₃_imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∀ a b c, p a b c) → ∀ a b c, q a b c :=
forall_imp fun a ↦ forall₂_imp <| h a
theorem Exists₂.imp {p q : ∀ a, β a → Prop} (h : ∀ a b, p a b → q a b) :
(∃ a b, p a b) → ∃ a b, q a b :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists.imp <| h a
theorem Exists₃.imp {p q : ∀ a b, γ a b → Prop} (h : ∀ a b c, p a b c → q a b c) :
(∃ a b c, p a b c) → ∃ a b c, q a b c :=
Exists.imp fun a ↦ Exists₂.imp <| h a
end Dependent
variable {α β : Sort*} {p : α → Prop}
theorem forall_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∀ x y, p x y) ↔ ∀ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun f x y ↦ f y x, fun f x y ↦ f y x⟩
theorem forall₂_swap
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∀ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := ⟨swap₂, swap₂⟩
/-- We intentionally restrict the type of `α` in this lemma so that this is a safer to use in simp
than `forall_swap`. -/
theorem imp_forall_iff {α : Type*} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} : (p → ∀ x, q x) ↔ ∀ x, p → q x :=
forall_swap
lemma imp_forall_iff_forall (A : Prop) (B : A → Prop) :
(A → ∀ h : A, B h) ↔ ∀ h : A, B h := by by_cases h : A <;> simp [h]
theorem exists_swap {p : α → β → Prop} : (∃ x y, p x y) ↔ ∃ y x, p x y :=
⟨fun ⟨x, y, h⟩ ↦ ⟨y, x, h⟩, fun ⟨y, x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x, y, h⟩⟩
theorem exists_and_exists_comm {P : α → Prop} {Q : β → Prop} :
(∃ a, P a) ∧ (∃ b, Q b) ↔ ∃ a b, P a ∧ Q b :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩, fun ⟨a, b, ⟨ha, hb⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, ⟨b, hb⟩⟩⟩
export Classical (not_forall)
theorem not_forall_not : (¬∀ x, ¬p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall_not
export Classical (not_exists_not)
lemma forall_or_exists_not (P : α → Prop) : (∀ a, P a) ∨ ∃ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_forall]; exact em _
lemma exists_or_forall_not (P : α → Prop) : (∃ a, P a) ∨ ∀ a, ¬ P a := by
rw [← not_exists]; exact em _
theorem forall_imp_iff_exists_imp {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} [ha : Nonempty α] :
(∀ x, p x) → b ↔ ∃ x, p x → b := by
classical
let ⟨a⟩ := ha
refine ⟨fun h ↦ not_forall_not.1 fun h' ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ h ↦ hx (h x)⟩
exact if hb : b then h' a fun _ ↦ hb else hb <| h fun x ↦ (_root_.not_imp.1 (h' x)).1
@[mfld_simps]
theorem forall_true_iff : (α → True) ↔ True := imp_true_iff _
-- Unfortunately this causes simp to loop sometimes, so we
-- add the 2 and 3 cases as simp lemmas instead
theorem forall_true_iff' (h : ∀ a, p a ↔ True) : (∀ a, p a) ↔ True :=
iff_true_intro fun _ ↦ of_iff_true (h _)
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₂_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} : (∀ a, β a → True) ↔ True := by simp
-- This is not marked `@[simp]` because `implies_true : (α → True) = True` works
theorem forall₃_true_iff {β : α → Sort*} {γ : ∀ a, β a → Sort*} :
(∀ (a) (b : β a), γ a b → True) ↔ True := by simp
theorem Decidable.and_forall_ne [DecidableEq α] (a : α) {p : α → Prop} :
(p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b := by
simp only [← @forall_eq _ p a, ← forall_and, ← or_imp, Decidable.em, forall_const]
theorem and_forall_ne (a : α) : (p a ∧ ∀ b, b ≠ a → p b) ↔ ∀ b, p b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_forall_ne a
theorem Ne.ne_or_ne {x y : α} (z : α) (h : x ≠ y) : x ≠ z ∨ y ≠ z :=
not_and_or.1 <| mt (and_imp.2 (· ▸ ·)) h.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_apply_eq_apply' (f : α → β) (a' : α) : ∃ a, f a' = f a := ⟨a', rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2 {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f x y = f a b :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply2' {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {a : α} {b : β} : ∃ x y, f a b = f x y :=
⟨a, b, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3 {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f x y z = f a b c :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
@[simp]
lemma exists_apply_eq_apply3' {α β γ δ} {f : α → β → γ → δ} {a : α} {b : β} {c : γ} :
∃ x y z, f a b c = f x y z :=
⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩
/--
The constant function witnesses that
there exists a function sending a given term to a given term.
This is sometimes useful in `simp` to discharge side conditions.
-/
theorem exists_apply_eq (a : α) (b : β) : ∃ f : α → β, f a = b := ⟨fun _ ↦ b, rfl⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, p a ∧ f a = b) ∧ q b) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ q (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, hab⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, hab.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, hp, hq⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, hp, rfl⟩, hq⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_eq_and {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ b, (∃ a, f a = b) ∧ p b) ↔ ∃ a, p (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha⟩, hb⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha.symm ▸ hb⟩, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨f a, ⟨a, rfl⟩, ha⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_and_exists_and_eq_and {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} {r : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ f a b = c) ∧ r c) ↔ ∃ a, p a ∧ ∃ b, q b ∧ r (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, ha, b, hb, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, ha, b, hb, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem exists_exists_exists_and_eq {α β γ : Type*}
{f : α → β → γ} {p : γ → Prop} :
(∃ c, (∃ a, ∃ b, f a b = c) ∧ p c) ↔ ∃ a, ∃ b, p (f a b) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ⟨a, b, hab⟩, hc⟩ ↦ ⟨a, b, hab.symm ▸ hc⟩,
fun ⟨a, b, hab⟩ ↦ ⟨f a b, ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, hab⟩⟩
theorem forall_apply_eq_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, f a = b → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem forall_eq_apply_imp_iff' {f : α → β} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ a b, b = f a → p b) ↔ ∀ a, p (f a) := by simp
theorem exists₂_comm
{ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*} {p : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Prop} :
(∃ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂) ↔ ∃ i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁, p i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := by
simp only [@exists_comm (κ₁ _), @exists_comm ι₁]
theorem And.exists {p q : Prop} {f : p ∧ q → Prop} : (∃ h, f h) ↔ ∃ hp hq, f ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨h, H⟩ ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2, H⟩, fun ⟨hp, hq, H⟩ ↦ ⟨⟨hp, hq⟩, H⟩⟩
theorem forall_or_of_or_forall {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {b : Prop} (h : b ∨ ∀ x, p x) (x : α) :
b ∨ p x :=
h.imp_right fun h₂ ↦ h₂ x
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_left {q : Prop} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
⟨fun h ↦ if hq : q then Or.inl hq else
Or.inr fun x ↦ (h x).resolve_left hq, forall_or_of_or_forall⟩
theorem forall_or_left {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, q ∨ p x) ↔ q ∨ ∀ x, p x :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_left
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} [Decidable q] :
(∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q := by simp [or_comm, Decidable.forall_or_left]
theorem forall_or_right {q} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ x, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∨ q :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.forall_or_right
theorem Exists.fst {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : Exists p → b
| ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem Exists.snd {b : Prop} {p : b → Prop} : ∀ h : Exists p, p h.fst
| ⟨_, h⟩ => h
theorem Prop.exists_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∃ h, p h) ↔ p False ∨ p True :=
⟨fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ ↦ by_cases (fun H : h₁ ↦ .inr <| by simpa only [H] using h₂)
(fun H ↦ .inl <| by simpa only [H] using h₂), fun h ↦ h.elim (.intro _) (.intro _)⟩
theorem Prop.forall_iff {p : Prop → Prop} : (∀ h, p h) ↔ p False ∧ p True :=
⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ h ↦ by by_cases H : h <;> simpa only [H]⟩
theorem exists_iff_of_forall {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} (h : ∀ h, q h) : (∃ h, q h) ↔ p :=
⟨Exists.fst, fun H ↦ ⟨H, h H⟩⟩
theorem exists_prop_of_false {p : Prop} {q : p → Prop} : ¬p → ¬∃ h' : p, q h' :=
mt Exists.fst
/- See `IsEmpty.exists_iff` for the `False` version of `exists_true_left`. -/
theorem forall_prop_congr {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) ↔ ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
⟨fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).1 (h1 (hp.2 h2)), fun h1 h2 ↦ (hq _).2 (h1 (hp.1 h2))⟩
theorem forall_prop_congr' {p p' : Prop} {q q' : p → Prop} (hq : ∀ h, q h ↔ q' h) (hp : p ↔ p') :
(∀ h, q h) = ∀ h : p', q' (hp.2 h) :=
propext (forall_prop_congr hq hp)
lemma imp_congr_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr h₁.to_iff h₂.to_iff)
lemma imp_congr_ctx_eq {a b c d : Prop} (h₁ : a = c) (h₂ : c → b = d) : (a → b) = (c → d) :=
propext (imp_congr_ctx h₁.to_iff fun hc ↦ (h₂ hc).to_iff)
lemma eq_true_intro {a : Prop} (h : a) : a = True := propext (iff_true_intro h)
lemma eq_false_intro {a : Prop} (h : ¬a) : a = False := propext (iff_false_intro h)
-- FIXME: `alias` creates `def Iff.eq := propext` instead of `lemma Iff.eq := propext`
@[nolint defLemma] alias Iff.eq := propext
lemma iff_eq_eq {a b : Prop} : (a ↔ b) = (a = b) := propext ⟨propext, Eq.to_iff⟩
-- They were not used in Lean 3 and there are already lemmas with those names in Lean 4
/-- See `IsEmpty.forall_iff` for the `False` version. -/
@[simp] theorem forall_true_left (p : True → Prop) : (∀ x, p x) ↔ p True.intro :=
forall_prop_of_true _
end Quantifiers
/-! ### Classical lemmas -/
namespace Classical
-- use shortened names to avoid conflict when classical namespace is open.
/-- Any prop `p` is decidable classically. A shorthand for `Classical.propDecidable`. -/
noncomputable def dec (p : Prop) : Decidable p := by infer_instance
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Any predicate `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decPred (p : α → Prop) : DecidablePred p := by infer_instance
/-- Any relation `p` is decidable classically. -/
noncomputable def decRel (p : α → α → Prop) : DecidableRel p := by infer_instance
/-- Any type `α` has decidable equality classically. -/
noncomputable def decEq (α : Sort*) : DecidableEq α := by infer_instance
/-- Construct a function from a default value `H0`, and a function to use if there exists a value
satisfying the predicate. -/
noncomputable def existsCases {α C : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (H0 : C) (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
if h : ∃ a, p a then H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h) else H0
theorem some_spec₂ {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} {h : ∃ a, p a} (q : α → Prop)
(hpq : ∀ a, p a → q a) : q (choose h) := hpq _ <| choose_spec _
/-- A version of `byContradiction` that uses types instead of propositions. -/
protected noncomputable def byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (H : ¬(α → False)) : α :=
Classical.choice <| (peirce _ False) fun h ↦ (H fun a ↦ h ⟨a⟩).elim
/-- `Classical.byContradiction'` is equivalent to lean's axiom `Classical.choice`. -/
def choice_of_byContradiction' {α : Sort*} (contra : ¬(α → False) → α) : Nonempty α → α :=
fun H ↦ contra H.elim
@[simp] lemma choose_eq (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (· = a) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a := @choose_spec _ (· = a) _
@[simp]
lemma choose_eq' (a : α) : @Exists.choose _ (a = ·) ⟨a, rfl⟩ = a :=
(@choose_spec _ (a = ·) _).symm
alias axiom_of_choice := axiomOfChoice -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_cases := byCases -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
alias by_contradiction := byContradiction -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
-- The remaining theorems in this section were ported from Lean 3,
-- but are currently unused in Mathlib, so have been deprecated.
-- If any are being used downstream, please remove the deprecation.
alias prop_complete := propComplete -- TODO: remove? rename in core?
end Classical
/-- This function has the same type as `Exists.recOn`, and can be used to case on an equality,
but `Exists.recOn` can only eliminate into Prop, while this version eliminates into any universe
using the axiom of choice. -/
noncomputable def Exists.classicalRecOn {α : Sort*} {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ a, p a)
{C : Sort*} (H : ∀ a, p a → C) : C :=
H (Classical.choose h) (Classical.choose_spec h)
/-! ### Declarations about bounded quantifiers -/
section BoundedQuantifiers
variable {α : Sort*} {r p q : α → Prop} {P Q : ∀ x, p x → Prop}
theorem bex_def : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) ↔ ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩, fun ⟨x, px, qx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, px, qx⟩⟩
theorem BEx.elim {b : Prop} : (∃ x h, P x h) → (∀ a h, P a h → b) → b
| ⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩, h' => h' a h₁ h₂
theorem BEx.intro (a : α) (h₁ : p a) (h₂ : P a h₁) : ∃ (x : _) (h : p x), P x h :=
⟨a, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem BAll.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) (h₁ : ∀ x h, P x h) (x h) : Q x h :=
H _ _ <| h₁ _ _
theorem BEx.imp_right (H : ∀ x h, P x h → Q x h) : (∃ x h, P x h) → ∃ x h, Q x h
| ⟨_, _, h'⟩ => ⟨_, _, H _ _ h'⟩
theorem BAll.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) (h₁ : ∀ x, q x → r x) (x) (h : p x) : r x :=
h₁ _ <| H _ h
theorem BEx.imp_left (H : ∀ x, p x → q x) : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x
| ⟨x, hp, hr⟩ => ⟨x, H _ hp, hr⟩
theorem exists_mem_of_exists (H : ∀ x, p x) : (∃ x, q x) → ∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x
| ⟨x, hq⟩ => ⟨x, H x, hq⟩
theorem exists_of_exists_mem : (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), q x) → ∃ x, q x
| ⟨x, _, hq⟩ => ⟨x, hq⟩
theorem not_exists_mem : (¬∃ x h, P x h) ↔ ∀ x h, ¬P x h := exists₂_imp
theorem not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not : (∃ x h, ¬P x h) → ¬∀ x h, P x h
| ⟨x, h, hp⟩, al => hp <| al x h
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.not_forall₂ [Decidable (∃ x h, ¬P x h)] [∀ x h, Decidable (P x h)] :
(¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
⟨Not.decidable_imp_symm fun nx x h ↦ nx.decidable_imp_symm
fun h' ↦ ⟨x, h, h'⟩, not_forall₂_of_exists₂_not⟩
theorem not_forall₂ : (¬∀ x h, P x h) ↔ ∃ x h, ¬P x h :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_forall₂
theorem forall₂_and : (∀ x h, P x h ∧ Q x h) ↔ (∀ x h, P x h) ∧ ∀ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ forall_and) forall_and
theorem forall_and_left [Nonempty α] (q : Prop) (p : α → Prop) :
(∀ x, q ∧ p x) ↔ (q ∧ ∀ x, p x) := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem forall_and_right [Nonempty α] (p : α → Prop) (q : Prop) :
(∀ x, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∀ x, p x) ∧ q := by rw [forall_and, forall_const]
theorem exists_mem_or : (∃ x h, P x h ∨ Q x h) ↔ (∃ x h, P x h) ∨ ∃ x h, Q x h :=
Iff.trans (exists_congr fun _ ↦ exists_or) exists_or
theorem forall₂_or_left : (∀ x, p x ∨ q x → r x) ↔ (∀ x, p x → r x) ∧ ∀ x, q x → r x :=
Iff.trans (forall_congr' fun _ ↦ or_imp) forall_and
theorem exists_mem_or_left :
(∃ (x : _) (_ : p x ∨ q x), r x) ↔ (∃ (x : _) (_ : p x), r x) ∨ ∃ (x : _) (_ : q x), r x := by
simp only [exists_prop]
exact Iff.trans (exists_congr fun x ↦ or_and_right) exists_or
end BoundedQuantifiers
section ite
variable {α : Sort*} {σ : α → Sort*} {P Q R : Prop} [Decidable P]
{a b c : α} {A : P → α} {B : ¬P → α}
theorem dite_eq_iff : dite P A B = c ↔ (∃ h, A h = c) ∨ ∃ h, B h = c := by
by_cases P <;> simp [*, exists_prop_of_true, exists_prop_of_false]
theorem ite_eq_iff : ite P a b = c ↔ P ∧ a = c ∨ ¬P ∧ b = c :=
dite_eq_iff.trans <| by rw [exists_prop, exists_prop]
theorem eq_ite_iff : a = ite P b c ↔ P ∧ a = b ∨ ¬P ∧ a = c :=
eq_comm.trans <| ite_eq_iff.trans <| (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm).or (Iff.rfl.and eq_comm)
theorem dite_eq_iff' : dite P A B = c ↔ (∀ h, A h = c) ∧ ∀ h, B h = c :=
⟨fun he ↦ ⟨fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).symm.trans he, fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).symm.trans he⟩, fun he ↦
(em P).elim (fun h ↦ (dif_pos h).trans <| he.1 h) fun h ↦ (dif_neg h).trans <| he.2 h⟩
theorem ite_eq_iff' : ite P a b = c ↔ (P → a = c) ∧ (¬P → b = c) := dite_eq_iff'
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 834 | 835 | theorem dite_ne_left_iff : dite P (fun _ ↦ a) B ≠ a ↔ ∃ h, a ≠ B h := by | rw [Ne, dite_eq_left_iff, not_forall] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 506 | 508 | theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by | refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
· exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 142 | 144 | theorem disjoint_prod : Disjoint (s₁ ×ˢ t₁) (s₂ ×ˢ t₂) ↔ Disjoint s₁ s₂ ∨ Disjoint t₁ t₂ := by | simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_prod, not_and_or, Prod.forall, and_imp, ← @forall_or_right α, ←
@forall_or_left β, ← @forall_or_right (_ ∈ s₁), ← @forall_or_left (_ ∈ t₁)] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Benjamin Davidson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.NegMulLog
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.NonIntegrable
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Deriv
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.ArctanDeriv
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
/-!
# Integration of specific interval integrals
This file contains proofs of the integrals of various specific functions. This includes:
* Integrals of simple functions, such as `id`, `pow`, `inv`, `exp`, `log`
* Integrals of some trigonometric functions, such as `sin`, `cos`, `1 / (1 + x^2)`
* The integral of `cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2`
* Reduction formulae for the integrals of `sin x ^ n` and `cos x ^ n` for `n ≥ 2`
* The computation of `∫ x in 0..π, sin x ^ n` as a product for even and odd `n` (used in proving the
Wallis product for pi)
* Integrals of the form `sin x ^ m * cos x ^ n`
With these lemmas, many simple integrals can be computed by `simp` or `norm_num`.
This file also contains some facts about the interval integrability of specific functions.
This file is still being developed.
## Tags
integrate, integration, integrable, integrability
-/
open Real Set Finset
open scoped Real Interval
variable {a b : ℝ} (n : ℕ)
namespace intervalIntegral
open MeasureTheory
variable {f : ℝ → ℝ} {μ : Measure ℝ} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (c d : ℝ)
/-! ### Interval integrability -/
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_pow : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ n) μ a b :=
(continuous_pow n).intervalIntegrable a b
theorem intervalIntegrable_zpow {n : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ n ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ n) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_id.zpow₀ n fun _ hx => h.symm.imp (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx) id).intervalIntegrable
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_rpow'` for a version with a weaker hypothesis on `r`, but assuming the
measure is volume. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_rpow {r : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ r ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_id.rpow_const fun _ hx =>
h.symm.imp (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx) id).intervalIntegrable
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_rpow` for a version applying to any locally finite measure, but with a
stronger hypothesis on `r`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_rpow' {r : ℝ} (h : -1 < r) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume a b := by
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume 0 c by
exact IntervalIntegrable.trans (this a).symm (this b)
have : ∀ c : ℝ, 0 ≤ c → IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x ^ r) volume 0 c := by
intro c hc
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le hc]
have hderiv : ∀ x ∈ Ioo 0 c, HasDerivAt (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1)) (x ^ r) x := by
intro x hx
convert (Real.hasDerivAt_rpow_const (p := r + 1) (Or.inl hx.1.ne')).div_const (r + 1) using 1
field_simp [(by linarith : r + 1 ≠ 0)]
apply integrableOn_deriv_of_nonneg _ hderiv
· intro x hx; apply rpow_nonneg hx.1.le
· refine (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_).div_const _; intro x _; right; linarith
intro c; rcases le_total 0 c with (hc | hc)
· exact this c hc
· rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg, neg_zero]
have m := (this (-c) (by linarith)).smul (cos (r * π))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff] at m ⊢
refine m.congr_fun ?_ measurableSet_Ioc; intro x hx
rw [uIoc_of_le (by linarith : 0 ≤ -c)] at hx
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, log_neg_eq_log, mul_comm,
rpow_def_of_pos hx.1, rpow_def_of_neg (by linarith [hx.1] : -x < 0)]
/-- The power function `x ↦ x^s` is integrable on `(0, t)` iff `-1 < s`. -/
lemma integrableOn_Ioo_rpow_iff {s t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x ^ s) (Ioo (0 : ℝ) t) ↔ -1 < s := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simpa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le ht.le]
using intervalIntegrable_rpow' h (a := 0) (b := t)⟩
contrapose! h
intro H
have I : 0 < min 1 t := lt_min zero_lt_one ht
have H' : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x ^ s) (Ioo 0 (min 1 t)) :=
H.mono (Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl (min_le_right _ _)) le_rfl
have : IntegrableOn (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) (Ioo 0 (min 1 t)) := by
apply H'.mono' measurable_inv.aestronglyMeasurable
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem measurableSet_Ioo] with x hx
simp only [norm_inv, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx.1)]
rwa [← Real.rpow_neg_one x, Real.rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx.1]
exact lt_of_lt_of_le hx.2 (min_le_left _ _)
have : IntervalIntegrable (fun x ↦ x⁻¹) volume 0 (min 1 t) := by
rwa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le I.le]
simp [intervalIntegrable_inv_iff, I.ne] at this
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_cpow'` for a version with a weaker hypothesis on `r`, but assuming the
measure is volume. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_cpow {r : ℂ} (h : 0 ≤ r.re ∨ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ r) μ a b := by
by_cases h2 : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]
· -- Easy case #1: 0 ∉ [a, b] -- use continuity.
refine (continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_).intervalIntegrable
exact Complex.continuousAt_ofReal_cpow_const _ _ (Or.inr <| ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h2)
rw [eq_false h2, or_false] at h
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le h with (h' | h')
· -- Easy case #2: 0 < re r -- again use continuity
exact (Complex.continuous_ofReal_cpow_const h').intervalIntegrable _ _
-- Now the hard case: re r = 0 and 0 is in the interval.
refine (IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff ?_).mp ?_
· refine (measurable_of_continuousOn_compl_singleton (0 : ℝ) ?_).aestronglyMeasurable
exact continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx =>
Complex.continuousAt_ofReal_cpow_const x r (Or.inr hx)
-- reduce to case of integral over `[0, c]`
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => ‖(x : ℂ) ^ r‖) μ 0 c from
(this a).symm.trans (this b)
intro c
rcases le_or_lt 0 c with (hc | hc)
· -- case `0 ≤ c`: integrand is identically 1
have : IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => 1 : ℝ → ℝ) μ 0 c := intervalIntegrable_const
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hc] at this ⊢
refine IntegrableOn.congr_fun this (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioc
dsimp only
rw [Complex.norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1, ← h', rpow_zero]
· -- case `c < 0`: integrand is identically constant, *except* at `x = 0` if `r ≠ 0`.
apply IntervalIntegrable.symm
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hc.le]
rw [← Ioo_union_right hc, integrableOn_union, and_comm]; constructor
· refine integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr (Or.inr ?_)
exact isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure.lt_top_of_isCompact
isCompact_singleton
· have : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo c 0 → ‖Complex.exp (↑π * Complex.I * r)‖ = ‖(x : ℂ) ^ r‖ := by
intro x hx
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos hx.2.le, norm_mul, ← Complex.ofReal_neg,
Complex.norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (neg_pos.mpr hx.2), ← h',
rpow_zero, one_mul]
refine IntegrableOn.congr_fun ?_ this measurableSet_Ioo
rw [integrableOn_const]
refine Or.inr ((measure_mono Set.Ioo_subset_Icc_self).trans_lt ?_)
exact isFiniteMeasureOnCompacts_of_isLocallyFiniteMeasure.lt_top_of_isCompact isCompact_Icc
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_cpow` for a version applying to any locally finite measure, but with a
stronger hypothesis on `r`. -/
theorem intervalIntegrable_cpow' {r : ℂ} (h : -1 < r.re) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume a b := by
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume 0 c by
exact IntervalIntegrable.trans (this a).symm (this b)
have : ∀ c : ℝ, 0 ≤ c → IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (x : ℂ) ^ r) volume 0 c := by
intro c hc
rw [← IntervalIntegrable.intervalIntegrable_norm_iff]
· rw [intervalIntegrable_iff]
apply IntegrableOn.congr_fun
· rw [← intervalIntegrable_iff]; exact intervalIntegral.intervalIntegrable_rpow' h
· intro x hx
rw [uIoc_of_le hc] at hx
dsimp only
rw [Complex.norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
· exact measurableSet_uIoc
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_uIoc
refine continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt fun x hx => ?_
rw [uIoc_of_le hc] at hx
refine (continuousAt_cpow_const (Or.inl ?_)).comp Complex.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
rw [Complex.ofReal_re]
exact hx.1
intro c; rcases le_total 0 c with (hc | hc)
· exact this c hc
· rw [IntervalIntegrable.iff_comp_neg, neg_zero]
have m := (this (-c) (by linarith)).const_mul (Complex.exp (π * Complex.I * r))
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff, uIoc_of_le (by linarith : 0 ≤ -c)] at m ⊢
refine m.congr_fun (fun x hx => ?_) measurableSet_Ioc
dsimp only
have : -x ≤ 0 := by linarith [hx.1]
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos this, mul_comm]
simp
/-- The complex power function `x ↦ x^s` is integrable on `(0, t)` iff `-1 < s.re`. -/
theorem integrableOn_Ioo_cpow_iff {s : ℂ} {t : ℝ} (ht : 0 < t) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ ↦ (x : ℂ) ^ s) (Ioo (0 : ℝ) t) ↔ -1 < s.re := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by simpa [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioo_of_le ht.le]
using intervalIntegrable_cpow' h (a := 0) (b := t)⟩
have B : IntegrableOn (fun a ↦ a ^ s.re) (Ioo 0 t) := by
apply (integrableOn_congr_fun _ measurableSet_Ioo).1 h.norm
intro a ha
simp [Complex.norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ha.1]
rwa [integrableOn_Ioo_rpow_iff ht] at B
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_id : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => x) μ a b :=
continuous_id.intervalIntegrable a b
theorem intervalIntegrable_const : IntervalIntegrable (fun _ => c) μ a b :=
continuous_const.intervalIntegrable a b
theorem intervalIntegrable_one_div (h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0)
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => 1 / f x) μ a b :=
(continuousOn_const.div hf h).intervalIntegrable
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_inv (h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0)
(hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (f x)⁻¹) μ a b := by
simpa only [one_div] using intervalIntegrable_one_div h hf
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_exp : IntervalIntegrable exp μ a b :=
continuous_exp.intervalIntegrable a b
@[simp]
theorem _root_.IntervalIntegrable.log (hf : ContinuousOn f [[a, b]])
(h : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ [[a, b]] → f x ≠ 0) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => log (f x)) μ a b :=
(ContinuousOn.log hf h).intervalIntegrable
/-- See `intervalIntegrable_log'` for a version without any hypothesis on the interval, but
assuming the measure is volume. -/
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_log (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : IntervalIntegrable log μ a b :=
IntervalIntegrable.log continuousOn_id fun _ hx => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
/-- The real logarithm is interval integrable (with respect to the volume measure) on every
interval. See `intervalIntegrable_log` for a version applying to any locally finite measure,
but with an additional hypothesis on the interval. -/
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_log' : IntervalIntegrable log volume a b := by
-- Log is even, so it suffices to consider the case 0 < a and b = 0
apply intervalIntegrable_of_even (log_neg_eq_log · |>.symm)
intro x hx
-- Split integral
apply IntervalIntegrable.trans (b := 1)
· -- Show integrability on [0…1] using non-negativity of the derivative
rw [← neg_neg log]
apply IntervalIntegrable.neg
apply intervalIntegrable_deriv_of_nonneg (g := fun x ↦ -(x * log x - x))
· exact (continuous_mul_log.continuousOn.sub continuous_id.continuousOn).neg
· intro s ⟨hs, _⟩
norm_num at *
simpa using (hasDerivAt_id s).sub (hasDerivAt_mul_log hs.ne.symm)
· intro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩
norm_num at *
exact (log_nonpos_iff hs₁.le).mpr hs₂.le
· -- Show integrability on [1…t] by continuity
apply ContinuousOn.intervalIntegrable
apply Real.continuousOn_log.mono
apply Set.not_mem_uIcc_of_lt zero_lt_one at hx
simpa
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_sin : IntervalIntegrable sin μ a b :=
continuous_sin.intervalIntegrable a b
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_cos : IntervalIntegrable cos μ a b :=
continuous_cos.intervalIntegrable a b
theorem intervalIntegrable_one_div_one_add_sq :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => 1 / (↑1 + x ^ 2)) μ a b := by
refine (continuous_const.div ?_ fun x => ?_).intervalIntegrable a b
· fun_prop
· nlinarith
@[simp]
theorem intervalIntegrable_inv_one_add_sq :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (↑1 + x ^ 2)⁻¹) μ a b := by
field_simp; exact mod_cast intervalIntegrable_one_div_one_add_sq
/-! ### Integrals of the form `c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)` -/
section
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_right : (c * ∫ x in a..b, f (x * c)) = ∫ x in a * c..b * c, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_right f c
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_left : (c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x)) = ∫ x in c * a..c * b, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_left f c
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div : (c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c)) = ∫ x in a / c..b / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div f c
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_add :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x + d)) = ∫ x in c * a + d..c * b + d, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_add f c d
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_add_mul :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (d + c * x)) = ∫ x in d + c * a..d + c * b, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_add_mul f c d
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div_add :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c + d)) = ∫ x in a / c + d..b / c + d, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div_add f c d
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_add_div :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (d + x / c)) = ∫ x in d + a / c..d + b / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_add_div f c d
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_mul_sub :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (c * x - d)) = ∫ x in c * a - d..c * b - d, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_mul_sub f c d
@[simp]
theorem mul_integral_comp_sub_mul :
(c * ∫ x in a..b, f (d - c * x)) = ∫ x in d - c * b..d - c * a, f x :=
smul_integral_comp_sub_mul f c d
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_div_sub :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (x / c - d)) = ∫ x in a / c - d..b / c - d, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_div_sub f c d
@[simp]
theorem inv_mul_integral_comp_sub_div :
(c⁻¹ * ∫ x in a..b, f (d - x / c)) = ∫ x in d - b / c..d - a / c, f x :=
inv_smul_integral_comp_sub_div f c d
end
end intervalIntegral
open intervalIntegral
/-! ### Integrals of simple functions -/
theorem integral_cpow {r : ℂ} (h : -1 < r.re ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ r) = ((b : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) - (a : ℂ) ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
rw [sub_div]
have hr : r + 1 ≠ 0 := by
rcases h with h | h
· apply_fun Complex.re
rw [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, Complex.zero_re, Ne, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
exact h.ne'
· rw [Ne, ← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h; exact h.1
by_cases hab : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]
· apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt (fun x hx => ?_)
(intervalIntegrable_cpow (r := r) <| Or.inr hab)
refine hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx hab) ?_
contrapose! hr; rwa [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
replace h : -1 < r.re := by tauto
suffices ∀ c : ℝ, (∫ x : ℝ in (0)..c, (x : ℂ) ^ r) =
(c : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) - (0 : ℂ) ^ (r + 1) / (r + 1) by
rw [← integral_add_adjacent_intervals (@intervalIntegrable_cpow' a 0 r h)
(@intervalIntegrable_cpow' 0 b r h), integral_symm, this a, this b, Complex.zero_cpow hr]
ring
intro c
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDeriv_right
· refine ((Complex.continuous_ofReal_cpow_const ?_).div_const _).continuousOn
rwa [Complex.add_re, Complex.one_re, ← neg_lt_iff_pos_add]
· refine fun x hx => (hasDerivAt_ofReal_cpow_const' ?_ ?_).hasDerivWithinAt
· rcases le_total c 0 with (hc | hc)
· rw [max_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.2.ne
· rw [min_eq_left hc] at hx; exact hx.1.ne'
· contrapose! hr; rw [hr]; ring
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h
theorem integral_rpow {r : ℝ} (h : -1 < r ∨ r ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ r = (b ^ (r + 1) - a ^ (r + 1)) / (r + 1) := by
have h' : -1 < (r : ℂ).re ∨ (r : ℂ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := by
cases h
· left; rwa [Complex.ofReal_re]
· right; rwa [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Ne, Complex.ofReal_inj]
have :
(∫ x in a..b, (x : ℂ) ^ (r : ℂ)) = ((b : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ) - (a : ℂ) ^ (r + 1 : ℂ)) / (r + 1) :=
integral_cpow h'
apply_fun Complex.re at this; convert this
· simp_rw [intervalIntegral_eq_integral_uIoc, Complex.real_smul, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, rpow_def,
← RCLike.re_eq_complex_re, smul_eq_mul]
rw [integral_re]
refine intervalIntegrable_iff.mp ?_
rcases h' with h' | h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow' h'
· exact intervalIntegrable_cpow (Or.inr h'.2)
· rw [(by push_cast; rfl : (r : ℂ) + 1 = ((r + 1 : ℝ) : ℂ))]
simp_rw [div_eq_inv_mul, ← Complex.ofReal_inv, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, Complex.sub_re, rpow_def]
theorem integral_zpow {n : ℤ} (h : 0 ≤ n ∨ n ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) :
∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
replace h : -1 < (n : ℝ) ∨ (n : ℝ) ≠ -1 ∧ (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]] := mod_cast h
exact mod_cast integral_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem integral_pow : ∫ x in a..b, x ^ n = (b ^ (n + 1) - a ^ (n + 1)) / (n + 1) := by
simpa only [← Int.natCast_succ, zpow_natCast] using integral_zpow (Or.inl n.cast_nonneg)
/-- Integral of `|x - a| ^ n` over `Ι a b`. This integral appears in the proof of the
Picard-Lindelöf/Cauchy-Lipschitz theorem. -/
theorem integral_pow_abs_sub_uIoc : ∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
rcases le_or_lt a b with hab | hab
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in a..b, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_le hab, ← integral_of_le hab]
_ = ∫ x in (0)..(b - a), x ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonneg <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonneg.2 hab)] at hx
exact hx.1
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by simp [abs_of_nonneg (sub_nonneg.2 hab)]
· calc
∫ x in Ι a b, |x - a| ^ n = ∫ x in b..a, |x - a| ^ n := by
rw [uIoc_of_ge hab.le, ← integral_of_le hab.le]
_ = ∫ x in b - a..0, (-x) ^ n := by
simp only [integral_comp_sub_right fun x => |x| ^ n, sub_self]
refine integral_congr fun x hx => congr_arg₂ Pow.pow (abs_of_nonpos <| ?_) rfl
rw [uIcc_of_le (sub_nonpos.2 hab.le)] at hx
exact hx.2
_ = |b - a| ^ (n + 1) / (n + 1) := by
simp [integral_comp_neg fun x => x ^ n, abs_of_neg (sub_neg.2 hab)]
@[simp]
theorem integral_id : ∫ x in a..b, x = (b ^ 2 - a ^ 2) / 2 := by
have := @integral_pow a b 1
norm_num at this
exact this
theorem integral_one : (∫ _ in a..b, (1 : ℝ)) = b - a := by
simp only [mul_one, smul_eq_mul, integral_const]
theorem integral_const_on_unit_interval : ∫ _ in a..a + 1, b = b := by simp
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) := by
have h' := fun x (hx : x ∈ [[a, b]]) => ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hx h
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ deriv_log' (fun x hx => differentiableAt_log (h' x hx))
(continuousOn_inv₀.mono <| subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr h),
log_div (h' b right_mem_uIcc) (h' a left_mem_uIcc)]
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) :=
integral_inv <| not_mem_uIcc_of_lt ha hb
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) : ∫ x in a..b, x⁻¹ = log (b / a) :=
integral_inv <| not_mem_uIcc_of_gt ha hb
theorem integral_one_div (h : (0 : ℝ) ∉ [[a, b]]) : ∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by
simp only [one_div, integral_inv h]
theorem integral_one_div_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by simp only [one_div, integral_inv_of_pos ha hb]
theorem integral_one_div_of_neg (ha : a < 0) (hb : b < 0) :
∫ x : ℝ in a..b, 1 / x = log (b / a) := by simp only [one_div, integral_inv_of_neg ha hb]
@[simp]
theorem integral_exp : ∫ x in a..b, exp x = exp b - exp a := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub']
· simp
· exact fun _ _ => differentiableAt_exp
· exact continuousOn_exp
theorem integral_exp_mul_complex {c : ℂ} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(∫ x in a..b, Complex.exp (c * x)) = (Complex.exp (c * b) - Complex.exp (c * a)) / c := by
have D : ∀ x : ℝ, HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => Complex.exp (c * y) / c) (Complex.exp (c * x)) x := by
intro x
conv => congr
rw [← mul_div_cancel_right₀ (Complex.exp (c * x)) hc]
apply ((Complex.hasDerivAt_exp _).comp x _).div_const c
simpa only [mul_one] using ((hasDerivAt_id (x : ℂ)).const_mul _).comp_ofReal
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ (funext fun x => (D x).deriv) fun x _ => (D x).differentiableAt]
· ring
· fun_prop
/-- Helper lemma for `integral_log`: case where `a = 0` and `b` is positive. -/
lemma integral_log_from_zero_of_pos (ht : 0 < b) : ∫ s in (0)..b, log s = b * log b - b := by
-- Compute the integral by giving a primitive and considering it limit as x approaches 0 from the
-- right. The following lines were suggested by Gareth Ma on Zulip.
rw [integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_tendsto (f := fun x ↦ x * log x - x)
(fa := 0) (fb := b * log b - b) (hint := intervalIntegrable_log')]
· abel
· exact ht
· intro s ⟨hs, _ ⟩
simpa using (hasDerivAt_mul_log hs.ne.symm).sub (hasDerivAt_id s)
· simpa [mul_comm] using ((tendsto_log_mul_rpow_nhdsGT_zero zero_lt_one).sub
(tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds Filter.tendsto_id))
· exact tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds (ContinuousAt.tendsto (by fun_prop))
/-- Helper lemma for `integral_log`: case where `a = 0`. -/
lemma integral_log_from_zero {b : ℝ} : ∫ s in (0)..b, log s = b * log b - b := by
rcases lt_trichotomy b 0 with h | h | h
· -- If t is negative, use that log is an even function to reduce to the positive case.
conv => arg 1; arg 1; intro t; rw [← log_neg_eq_log]
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_comp_neg, intervalIntegral.integral_symm, neg_zero,
integral_log_from_zero_of_pos (Left.neg_pos_iff.mpr h), log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· simp [h]
· exact integral_log_from_zero_of_pos h
@[simp]
theorem integral_log : ∫ s in a..b, log s = b * log b - a * log a - b + a := by
rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_add_adjacent_intervals (b := 0)]
· rw [intervalIntegral.integral_symm, integral_log_from_zero, integral_log_from_zero]
ring
all_goals exact intervalIntegrable_log'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-12")]
alias integral_log_of_pos := integral_log
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-12")]
alias integral_log_of_neg := integral_log
@[simp]
theorem integral_sin : ∫ x in a..b, sin x = cos a - cos b := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub' fun x => -cos x]
· ring
· norm_num
· simp only [differentiableAt_neg_iff, differentiableAt_cos, implies_true]
· exact continuousOn_sin
@[simp]
theorem integral_cos : ∫ x in a..b, cos x = sin b - sin a := by
rw [integral_deriv_eq_sub']
· norm_num
· simp only [differentiableAt_sin, implies_true]
· exact continuousOn_cos
theorem integral_cos_mul_complex {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (a b : ℝ) :
(∫ x in a..b, Complex.cos (z * x)) = Complex.sin (z * b) / z - Complex.sin (z * a) / z := by
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt
swap
· apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable
exact Complex.continuous_cos.comp (continuous_const.mul Complex.continuous_ofReal)
intro x _
have a := Complex.hasDerivAt_sin (↑x * z)
have b : HasDerivAt (fun y => y * z : ℂ → ℂ) z ↑x := hasDerivAt_mul_const _
have c : HasDerivAt (Complex.sin ∘ fun y : ℂ => (y * z)) _ ↑x := HasDerivAt.comp (𝕜 := ℂ) x a b
have d := HasDerivAt.comp_ofReal (c.div_const z)
simp only [mul_comm] at d
convert d using 1
conv_rhs => arg 1; rw [mul_comm]
rw [mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hz]
theorem integral_cos_sq_sub_sin_sq :
∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ 2 - sin x ^ 2 = sin b * cos b - sin a * cos a := by
simpa only [sq, sub_eq_add_neg, neg_mul_eq_mul_neg] using
integral_deriv_mul_eq_sub (fun x _ => hasDerivAt_sin x) (fun x _ => hasDerivAt_cos x)
continuousOn_cos.intervalIntegrable continuousOn_sin.neg.intervalIntegrable
theorem integral_one_div_one_add_sq :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, ↑1 / (↑1 + x ^ 2)) = arctan b - arctan a := by
refine integral_deriv_eq_sub' _ Real.deriv_arctan (fun _ _ => differentiableAt_arctan _)
(continuous_const.div ?_ fun x => ?_).continuousOn
· fun_prop
· nlinarith
@[simp]
theorem integral_inv_one_add_sq : (∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (↑1 + x ^ 2)⁻¹) = arctan b - arctan a := by
simp only [← one_div, integral_one_div_one_add_sq]
section RpowCpow
open Complex
theorem integral_mul_cpow_one_add_sq {t : ℂ} (ht : t ≠ -1) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, (x : ℂ) * ((1 : ℂ) + ↑x ^ 2) ^ t) =
((1 : ℂ) + (b : ℂ) ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + ↑1)) -
((1 : ℂ) + (a : ℂ) ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + ↑1)) := by
have : t + 1 ≠ 0 := by contrapose! ht; rwa [add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at ht
apply integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt
· intro x _
have f : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℂ => 1 + y ^ 2) (2 * x : ℂ) x := by
convert (hasDerivAt_pow 2 (x : ℂ)).const_add 1
simp
have g :
∀ {z : ℂ}, 0 < z.re → HasDerivAt (fun z => z ^ (t + 1) / (2 * (t + 1))) (z ^ t / 2) z := by
intro z hz
convert (HasDerivAt.cpow_const (c := t + 1) (hasDerivAt_id _)
(Or.inl hz)).div_const (2 * (t + 1)) using 1
field_simp
ring
convert (HasDerivAt.comp (↑x) (g _) f).comp_ofReal using 1
· field_simp; ring
· exact mod_cast add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg zero_lt_one (sq_nonneg x)
· apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable
refine continuous_ofReal.mul ?_
apply Continuous.cpow
· exact continuous_const.add (continuous_ofReal.pow 2)
· exact continuous_const
· intro a
norm_cast
exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg one_pos <| sq_nonneg a
theorem integral_mul_rpow_one_add_sq {t : ℝ} (ht : t ≠ -1) :
(∫ x : ℝ in a..b, x * (↑1 + x ^ 2) ^ t) =
(↑1 + b ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (↑2 * (t + ↑1)) - (↑1 + a ^ 2) ^ (t + 1) / (↑2 * (t + ↑1)) := by
have : ∀ x s : ℝ, (((↑1 + x ^ 2) ^ s : ℝ) : ℂ) = (1 + (x : ℂ) ^ 2) ^ (s : ℂ) := by
intro x s
norm_cast
rw [ofReal_cpow, ofReal_add, ofReal_pow, ofReal_one]
exact add_nonneg zero_le_one (sq_nonneg x)
rw [← ofReal_inj]
convert integral_mul_cpow_one_add_sq (_ : (t : ℂ) ≠ -1)
· rw [← intervalIntegral.integral_ofReal]
congr with x : 1
rw [ofReal_mul, this x t]
· simp_rw [ofReal_sub, ofReal_div, this a (t + 1), this b (t + 1)]
push_cast; rfl
· rw [← ofReal_one, ← ofReal_neg, Ne, ofReal_inj]
exact ht
end RpowCpow
open Nat
/-! ### Integral of `sin x ^ n` -/
theorem integral_sin_pow_aux :
(∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 2)) =
(sin a ^ (n + 1) * cos a - sin b ^ (n + 1) * cos b + (↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ n) -
(↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 2) := by
let C := sin a ^ (n + 1) * cos a - sin b ^ (n + 1) * cos b
have h : ∀ α β γ : ℝ, β * α * γ * α = β * (α * α * γ) := fun α β γ => by ring
have hu : ∀ x ∈ [[a, b]],
HasDerivAt (fun y => sin y ^ (n + 1)) ((n + 1 : ℕ) * cos x * sin x ^ n) x :=
fun x _ => by simpa only [mul_right_comm] using (hasDerivAt_sin x).pow (n + 1)
have hv : ∀ x ∈ [[a, b]], HasDerivAt (-cos) (sin x) x := fun x _ => by
simpa only [neg_neg] using (hasDerivAt_cos x).neg
have H := integral_mul_deriv_eq_deriv_mul hu hv ?_ ?_
· calc
(∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 2)) = ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 1) * sin x := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ]
_ = C + (↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ 2 * sin x ^ n := by simp [H, h, sq]; ring
_ = C + (↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ n - sin x ^ (n + 2) := by
simp [cos_sq', sub_mul, ← pow_add, add_comm]
_ = (C + (↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ n) - (↑n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 2) := by
rw [integral_sub, mul_sub, add_sub_assoc] <;>
apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable <;> fun_prop
all_goals apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable; fun_prop
/-- The reduction formula for the integral of `sin x ^ n` for any natural `n ≥ 2`. -/
theorem integral_sin_pow :
(∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ (n + 2)) =
(sin a ^ (n + 1) * cos a - sin b ^ (n + 1) * cos b) / (n + 2) +
(n + 1) / (n + 2) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ n := by
field_simp
convert eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mp (integral_sin_pow_aux n) using 1
ring
@[simp]
theorem integral_sin_sq : ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ 2 = (sin a * cos a - sin b * cos b + b - a) / 2 := by
field_simp [integral_sin_pow, add_sub_assoc]
theorem integral_sin_pow_odd :
(∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ (2 * n + 1)) = 2 * ∏ i ∈ range n, (2 * (i : ℝ) + 2) / (2 * i + 3) := by
induction' n with k ih; · norm_num
rw [prod_range_succ_comm, mul_left_comm, ← ih, mul_succ, integral_sin_pow]
norm_cast
simp [-cast_add, field_simps]
theorem integral_sin_pow_even :
(∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ (2 * n)) = π * ∏ i ∈ range n, (2 * (i : ℝ) + 1) / (2 * i + 2) := by
induction' n with k ih; · simp
rw [prod_range_succ_comm, mul_left_comm, ← ih, mul_succ, integral_sin_pow]
norm_cast
simp [-cast_add, field_simps]
theorem integral_sin_pow_pos : 0 < ∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ n := by
rcases even_or_odd' n with ⟨k, rfl | rfl⟩ <;>
simp only [integral_sin_pow_even, integral_sin_pow_odd] <;>
refine mul_pos (by norm_num [pi_pos]) (prod_pos fun n _ => div_pos ?_ ?_) <;>
norm_cast <;>
omega
theorem integral_sin_pow_succ_le : (∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ (n + 1)) ≤ ∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ n := by
let H x h := pow_le_pow_of_le_one (sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h) (sin_le_one x) (n.le_add_right 1)
refine integral_mono_on pi_pos.le ?_ ?_ H <;> exact (continuous_sin.pow _).intervalIntegrable 0 π
theorem integral_sin_pow_antitone : Antitone fun n : ℕ => ∫ x in (0)..π, sin x ^ n :=
antitone_nat_of_succ_le integral_sin_pow_succ_le
/-! ### Integral of `cos x ^ n` -/
theorem integral_cos_pow_aux :
(∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 2)) =
(cos b ^ (n + 1) * sin b - cos a ^ (n + 1) * sin a + (n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ n) -
(n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 2) := by
let C := cos b ^ (n + 1) * sin b - cos a ^ (n + 1) * sin a
have h : ∀ α β γ : ℝ, β * α * γ * α = β * (α * α * γ) := fun α β γ => by ring
have hu : ∀ x ∈ [[a, b]],
HasDerivAt (fun y => cos y ^ (n + 1)) (-(n + 1 : ℕ) * sin x * cos x ^ n) x :=
fun x _ => by
simpa only [mul_right_comm, neg_mul, mul_neg] using (hasDerivAt_cos x).pow (n + 1)
have hv : ∀ x ∈ [[a, b]], HasDerivAt sin (cos x) x := fun x _ => hasDerivAt_sin x
have H := integral_mul_deriv_eq_deriv_mul hu hv ?_ ?_
· calc
(∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 2)) = ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 1) * cos x := by
simp only [_root_.pow_succ]
_ = C + (n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ 2 * cos x ^ n := by simp [C, H, h, sq, -neg_add_rev]
_ = C + (n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ n - cos x ^ (n + 2) := by
simp [sin_sq, sub_mul, ← pow_add, add_comm]
_ = (C + (n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ n) - (n + 1) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 2) := by
rw [integral_sub, mul_sub, add_sub_assoc] <;>
apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable <;> fun_prop
all_goals apply Continuous.intervalIntegrable; fun_prop
/-- The reduction formula for the integral of `cos x ^ n` for any natural `n ≥ 2`. -/
theorem integral_cos_pow :
(∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ (n + 2)) =
(cos b ^ (n + 1) * sin b - cos a ^ (n + 1) * sin a) / (n + 2) +
(n + 1) / (n + 2) * ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ n := by
field_simp
convert eq_sub_iff_add_eq.mp (integral_cos_pow_aux n) using 1
ring
@[simp]
theorem integral_cos_sq : ∫ x in a..b, cos x ^ 2 = (cos b * sin b - cos a * sin a + b - a) / 2 := by
field_simp [integral_cos_pow, add_sub_assoc]
/-! ### Integral of `sin x ^ m * cos x ^ n` -/
/-- Simplification of the integral of `sin x ^ m * cos x ^ n`, case `n` is odd. -/
theorem integral_sin_pow_mul_cos_pow_odd (m n : ℕ) :
(∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ m * cos x ^ (2 * n + 1)) = ∫ u in sin a..sin b, u^m * (↑1 - u ^ 2) ^ n :=
have hc : Continuous fun u : ℝ => u ^ m * (↑1 - u ^ 2) ^ n := by fun_prop
calc
(∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ m * cos x ^ (2 * n + 1)) =
∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ m * (↑1 - sin x ^ 2) ^ n * cos x := by
simp only [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_succ, mul_assoc, pow_mul, one_mul]
congr! 5
rw [← sq, ← sq, cos_sq']
_ = ∫ u in sin a..sin b, u ^ m * (1 - u ^ 2) ^ n := by
-- Note(kmill): Didn't need `by exact`, but elaboration order seems to matter here.
exact integral_comp_mul_deriv (fun x _ => hasDerivAt_sin x) continuousOn_cos hc
/-- The integral of `sin x * cos x`, given in terms of sin².
See `integral_sin_mul_cos₂` below for the integral given in terms of cos². -/
@[simp]
theorem integral_sin_mul_cos₁ : ∫ x in a..b, sin x * cos x = (sin b ^ 2 - sin a ^ 2) / 2 := by
simpa using integral_sin_pow_mul_cos_pow_odd 1 0
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Integrals.lean | 752 | 753 | theorem integral_sin_sq_mul_cos :
∫ x in a..b, sin x ^ 2 * cos x = (sin b ^ 3 - sin a ^ 3) / 3 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Prod
/-!
# Partially defined linear maps
A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`.
We define a `SemilatticeInf` with `OrderBot` instance on this, and define three operations:
* `mkSpanSingleton` defines a partial linear map defined on the span of a singleton.
* `sup` takes two partial linear maps `f`, `g` that agree on the intersection of their
domains, and returns the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that
extends both `f` and `g`.
* `sSup` takes a `DirectedOn (· ≤ ·)` set of partial linear maps, and returns the unique
partial linear map on the `sSup` of their domains that extends all these maps.
Moreover, we define
* `LinearPMap.graph` is the graph of the partial linear map viewed as a submodule of `E × F`.
Partially defined maps are currently used in `Mathlib` to prove Hahn-Banach theorem
and its variations. Namely, `LinearPMap.sSup` implies that every chain of `LinearPMap`s
is bounded above.
They are also the basis for the theory of unbounded operators.
-/
universe u v w
/-- A `LinearPMap R E F` or `E →ₗ.[R] F` is a linear map from a submodule of `E` to `F`. -/
structure LinearPMap (R : Type u) [Ring R] (E : Type v) [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] (F : Type w)
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] where
domain : Submodule R E
toFun : domain →ₗ[R] F
@[inherit_doc] notation:25 E " →ₗ.[" R:25 "] " F:0 => LinearPMap R E F
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {E : Type*} [AddCommGroup E] [Module R E] {F : Type*}
[AddCommGroup F] [Module R F] {G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G] [Module R G]
namespace LinearPMap
open Submodule
@[coe]
def toFun' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f.domain → F := f.toFun
instance : CoeFun (E →ₗ.[R] F) fun f : E →ₗ.[R] F => f.domain → F :=
⟨toFun'⟩
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f.toFun x = f x :=
rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem ext {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.domain = g.domain)
(h' : ∀ ⦃x : E⦄ ⦃hf : x ∈ f.domain⦄ ⦃hg : x ∈ g.domain⦄, f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩) : f = g := by
rcases f with ⟨f_dom, f⟩
rcases g with ⟨g_dom, g⟩
obtain rfl : f_dom = g_dom := h
congr
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
apply h'
/-- A dependent version of `ext`. -/
theorem dExt {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.domain = g.domain)
(h' : ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y) : f = g :=
ext h fun _ _ _ ↦ h' rfl
@[simp]
theorem map_zero (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toFun.map_zero
theorem ext_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f = g ↔
f.domain = g.domain ∧
∀ ⦃x : E⦄ ⦃hf : x ∈ f.domain⦄ ⦃hg : x ∈ g.domain⦄, f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩ :=
⟨by rintro rfl; simp, fun ⟨deq, feq⟩ ↦ ext deq feq⟩
theorem dExt_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} :
f = g ↔
∃ _domain_eq : f.domain = g.domain,
∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y :=
⟨fun EQ =>
EQ ▸
⟨rfl, fun x y h => by
congr
exact mod_cast h⟩,
fun ⟨deq, feq⟩ => dExt deq feq⟩
theorem ext' {s : Submodule R E} {f g : s →ₗ[R] F} (h : f = g) : mk s f = mk s g :=
h ▸ rfl
theorem map_add (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x + y) = f x + f y :=
f.toFun.map_add x y
theorem map_neg (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : f.domain) : f (-x) = -f x :=
f.toFun.map_neg x
theorem map_sub (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x y : f.domain) : f (x - y) = f x - f y :=
f.toFun.map_sub x y
theorem map_smul (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (c : R) (x : f.domain) : f (c • x) = c • f x :=
f.toFun.map_smul c x
@[simp]
theorem mk_apply (p : Submodule R E) (f : p →ₗ[R] F) (x : p) : mk p f x = f x :=
rfl
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `R ∙ x` that sends `x` to `y`. This version works for modules
over rings, and requires a proof of `∀ c, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0`. -/
noncomputable def mkSpanSingleton' (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
E →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := R ∙ x
toFun :=
have H : ∀ c₁ c₂ : R, c₁ • x = c₂ • x → c₁ • y = c₂ • y := by
intro c₁ c₂ h
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul] at h ⊢
exact H _ h
{ toFun z := Classical.choose (mem_span_singleton.1 z.prop) • y
map_add' y z := by
rw [← add_smul, H]
have (w : R ∙ x) := Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)
simp only [add_smul, sub_smul, this, ← coe_add]
map_smul' c z := by
rw [smul_smul, H]
have (w : R ∙ x) := Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 w.prop)
simp only [mul_smul, this]
apply coe_smul }
@[simp]
theorem domain_mkSpanSingleton (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) :
(mkSpanSingleton' x y H).domain = R ∙ x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (c : R) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨c • x, h⟩ = c • y := by
dsimp [mkSpanSingleton']
rw [← sub_eq_zero, ← sub_smul]
apply H
simp only [sub_smul, one_smul, sub_eq_zero]
apply Classical.choose_spec (mem_span_singleton.1 h)
@[simp]
theorem mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self (x : E) (y : F) (H : ∀ c : R, c • x = 0 → c • y = 0) (h) :
mkSpanSingleton' x y H ⟨x, h⟩ = y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← one_smul R y]
rw [← mkSpanSingleton'_apply x y H 1 ?_]
· congr
rw [one_smul]
· rwa [one_smul]
/-- The unique `LinearPMap` on `span R {x}` that sends a non-zero vector `x` to `y`.
This version works for modules over division rings. -/
noncomputable abbrev mkSpanSingleton {K E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E] [Module K E]
[AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ≠ 0) : E →ₗ.[K] F :=
mkSpanSingleton' x y fun c hc =>
(smul_eq_zero.1 hc).elim (fun hc => by rw [hc, zero_smul]) fun hx' => absurd hx' hx
theorem mkSpanSingleton_apply (K : Type*) {E F : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [AddCommGroup E]
[Module K E] [AddCommGroup F] [Module K F] {x : E} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : F) :
mkSpanSingleton x y hx ⟨x, (Submodule.mem_span_singleton_self x : x ∈ Submodule.span K {x})⟩ =
y :=
LinearPMap.mkSpanSingleton'_apply_self _ _ _ _
/-- Projection to the first coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def fst (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] E where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.fst R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
@[simp]
theorem fst_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.fst p p' x = (x : E × F).1 :=
rfl
/-- Projection to the second coordinate as a `LinearPMap` -/
protected def snd (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) : E × F →ₗ.[R] F where
domain := p.prod p'
toFun := (LinearMap.snd R E F).comp (p.prod p').subtype
@[simp]
theorem snd_apply (p : Submodule R E) (p' : Submodule R F) (x : p.prod p') :
LinearPMap.snd p p' x = (x : E × F).2 :=
rfl
instance le : LE (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => f.domain ≤ g.domain ∧ ∀ ⦃x : f.domain⦄ ⦃y : g.domain⦄ (_h : (x : E) = y), f x = g y⟩
theorem apply_comp_inclusion {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
T x = S (Submodule.inclusion h.1 x) :=
h.2 rfl
theorem exists_of_le {T S : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : T ≤ S) (x : T.domain) :
∃ y : S.domain, (x : E) = y ∧ T x = S y :=
⟨⟨x.1, h.1 x.2⟩, ⟨rfl, h.2 rfl⟩⟩
theorem eq_of_le_of_domain_eq {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hle : f ≤ g) (heq : f.domain = g.domain) :
f = g :=
dExt heq hle.2
/-- Given two partial linear maps `f`, `g`, the set of points `x` such that
both `f` and `g` are defined at `x` and `f x = g x` form a submodule. -/
def eqLocus (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R E where
carrier := { x | ∃ (hf : x ∈ f.domain) (hg : x ∈ g.domain), f ⟨x, hf⟩ = g ⟨x, hg⟩ }
zero_mem' := ⟨zero_mem _, zero_mem _, f.map_zero.trans g.map_zero.symm⟩
add_mem' {x y} := fun ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩ ⟨hfy, hgy, hy⟩ ↦
⟨add_mem hfx hfy, add_mem hgx hgy, by
simp_all [← AddMemClass.mk_add_mk, f.map_add, g.map_add]⟩
smul_mem' c x := fun ⟨hfx, hgx, hx⟩ ↦
⟨smul_mem _ c hfx, smul_mem _ c hgx, by
have {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hfx) : (⟨c • x, smul_mem _ c hfx⟩ : f.domain) = c • ⟨x, hfx⟩ := by simp
rw [this hfx, this hgx, f.map_smul, g.map_smul, hx]⟩
instance bot : Bot (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⟨⊥, 0⟩⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance semilatticeInf : SemilatticeInf (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl f := ⟨le_refl f.domain, fun _ _ h => Subtype.eq h ▸ rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨gh_le, gh_eq⟩ =>
⟨le_trans fg_le gh_le, fun x _ hxz =>
have hxy : (x : E) = inclusion fg_le x := rfl
(fg_eq hxy).trans (gh_eq <| hxy.symm.trans hxz)⟩
le_antisymm _ _ fg gf := eq_of_le_of_domain_eq fg (le_antisymm fg.1 gf.1)
inf f g := ⟨f.eqLocus g, f.toFun.comp <| inclusion fun _x hx => hx.fst⟩
le_inf := by
intro f g h ⟨fg_le, fg_eq⟩ ⟨fh_le, fh_eq⟩
exact ⟨fun x hx =>
⟨fg_le hx, fh_le hx,
(fg_eq (x := ⟨x, hx⟩) rfl).symm.trans (fh_eq rfl)⟩,
fun x ⟨y, yg, hy⟩ h => fg_eq h⟩
inf_le_left f _ := ⟨fun _ hx => hx.fst, fun _ _ h => congr_arg f <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
inf_le_right _ g :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.snd.fst, fun ⟨_, _, _, hx⟩ _ h => hx.trans <| congr_arg g <| Subtype.eq <| h⟩
instance orderBot : OrderBot (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
bot := ⊥
bot_le f :=
⟨bot_le, fun x y h => by
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq ((mem_bot R).1 x.2)
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h.symm.trans (congr_arg _ hx))
rw [hx, hy, map_zero, map_zero]⟩
theorem le_of_eqLocus_ge {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : f.domain ≤ f.eqLocus g) : f ≤ g :=
suffices f ≤ f ⊓ g from le_trans this inf_le_right
⟨H, fun _x _y hxy => ((inf_le_left : f ⊓ g ≤ f).2 hxy.symm).symm⟩
theorem domain_mono : StrictMono (@domain R _ E _ _ F _ _) := fun _f _g hlt =>
lt_of_le_of_ne hlt.1.1 fun heq => ne_of_lt hlt <| eq_of_le_of_domain_eq (le_of_lt hlt) heq
private theorem sup_aux (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
∃ fg : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) →ₗ[R] F,
∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)),
(x : E) + y = ↑z → fg z = f x + g y := by
choose x hx y hy hxy using fun z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain) => mem_sup.1 z.prop
set fg := fun z => f ⟨x z, hx z⟩ + g ⟨y z, hy z⟩
have fg_eq : ∀ (x' : f.domain) (y' : g.domain) (z' : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain))
(_H : (x' : E) + y' = z'), fg z' = f x' + g y' := by
intro x' y' z' H
dsimp [fg]
rw [add_comm, ← sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, eq_comm, ← map_sub, ← map_sub]
apply h
simp only [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hxy
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, coe_mk, coe_mk, hxy, ← sub_add, ← sub_sub, sub_self,
zero_sub, ← H]
apply neg_add_eq_sub
use { toFun := fg, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, fg_eq
· rintro ⟨z₁, hz₁⟩ ⟨z₂, hz₂⟩
rw [← add_assoc, add_right_comm (f _), ← map_add, add_assoc, ← map_add]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_add, coe_mk, ← add_assoc]
rw [add_right_comm (x _), hxy, add_assoc, hxy, coe_mk, coe_mk]
· intro c z
rw [smul_add, ← map_smul, ← map_smul]
apply fg_eq
simp only [coe_smul, coe_mk, ← smul_add, hxy, RingHom.id_apply]
/-- Given two partial linear maps that agree on the intersection of their domains,
`f.sup g h` is the unique partial linear map on `f.domain ⊔ g.domain` that agrees
with `f` and `g`. -/
protected noncomputable def sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose (sup_aux f g h)⟩
@[simp]
theorem domain_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) :
(f.sup g h).domain = f.domain ⊔ g.domain :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y)
(x : f.domain) (y : g.domain) (z : ↥(f.domain ⊔ g.domain)) (hz : (↑x : E) + ↑y = ↑z) :
f.sup g H z = f x + g y :=
Classical.choose_spec (sup_aux f g H) x y z hz
protected theorem left_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : f ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_left, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← add_zero (f _), ← g.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
protected theorem right_le_sup (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F)
(h : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) : g ≤ f.sup g h := by
refine ⟨le_sup_right, fun z₁ z₂ hz => ?_⟩
rw [← zero_add (g _), ← f.map_zero]
refine (sup_apply h _ _ _ ?_).symm
simpa
protected theorem sup_le {f g h : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(H : ∀ (x : f.domain) (y : g.domain), (x : E) = y → f x = g y) (fh : f ≤ h) (gh : g ≤ h) :
f.sup g H ≤ h :=
have Hf : f ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.left_le_sup g H) fh
have Hg : g ≤ f.sup g H ⊓ h := le_inf (f.right_le_sup g H) gh
le_of_eqLocus_ge <| sup_le Hf.1 Hg.1
/-- Hypothesis for `LinearPMap.sup` holds, if `f.domain` is disjoint with `g.domain`. -/
theorem sup_h_of_disjoint (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (h : Disjoint f.domain g.domain) (x : f.domain)
(y : g.domain) (hxy : (x : E) = y) : f x = g y := by
rw [disjoint_def] at h
have hy : y = 0 := Subtype.eq (h y (hxy ▸ x.2) y.2)
have hx : x = 0 := Subtype.eq (hxy.trans <| congr_arg _ hy)
simp [*]
/-! ### Algebraic operations -/
section Zero
instance instZero : Zero (E →ₗ.[R] F) := ⟨⊤, 0⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_domain : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : (⊤ : Submodule R E)) : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F) x = 0 := rfl
end Zero
section SMul
variable {M N : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F]
variable [Monoid N] [DistribMulAction N F] [SMulCommClass R N F]
instance instSMul : SMul M (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a f =>
{ domain := f.domain
toFun := a • f.toFun }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_domain (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (a • f).domain = f.domain :=
rfl
theorem smul_apply (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (a • f).domain) : (a • f) x = a • f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_smul (a : M) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(a • f) = a • ⇑f :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass M N F] : SMulCommClass M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_comm a b f.toFun⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul M N] [IsScalarTower M N F] : IsScalarTower M N (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext' <| smul_assoc a b f.toFun⟩
instance instMulAction : MulAction M (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
smul := (· • ·)
one_smul := fun ⟨_s, f⟩ => ext' <| one_smul M f
mul_smul a b f := ext' <| mul_smul a b f.toFun
end SMul
instance instNeg : Neg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => ⟨f.domain, -f.toFun⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (-f).domain = f.domain := rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : (-f) x = -f x :=
rfl
instance instInvolutiveNeg : InvolutiveNeg (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· rfl
· simp only [neg_apply, neg_neg]⟩
section Add
instance instAdd : Add (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
+ g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem add_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f + g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem add_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f + g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ + g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instAddSemigroup : AddSemigroup (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g h => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_assoc]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_assoc]⟩
instance instAddZeroClass : AddZeroClass (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, zero_add],
fun f => by
ext x y hxy
· simp [add_domain]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, zero_apply, add_zero]⟩
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
zero_add f := by
simp
add_zero := by
simp
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g => by
ext x y hxy
· simp only [add_domain, inf_comm]
· simp only [add_apply, hxy, add_comm]⟩
end Add
section VAdd
instance instVAdd : VAdd (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := g.domain
toFun := f.comp g.domain.subtype + g.toFun }⟩
@[simp]
theorem vadd_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f +ᵥ g).domain = g.domain :=
rfl
theorem vadd_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f +ᵥ g).domain) :
(f +ᵥ g) x = f x + g x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_vadd (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : ⇑(f +ᵥ g) = ⇑(f.comp g.domain.subtype) + ⇑g :=
rfl
instance instAddAction : AddAction (E →ₗ[R] F) (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
vadd := (· +ᵥ ·)
zero_vadd := fun ⟨_s, _f⟩ => ext' <| zero_add _
add_vadd := fun _f₁ _f₂ ⟨_s, _g⟩ => ext' <| LinearMap.ext fun _x => add_assoc _ _ _
end VAdd
section Sub
instance instSub : Sub (E →ₗ.[R] F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ domain := f.domain ⊓ g.domain
toFun := f.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_left : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _))
- g.toFun.comp (inclusion (inf_le_right : f.domain ⊓ g.domain ≤ _)) }⟩
theorem sub_domain (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) : (f - g).domain = f.domain ⊓ g.domain := rfl
theorem sub_apply (f g : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : (f.domain ⊓ g.domain : Submodule R E)) :
(f - g) x = f ⟨x, x.prop.1⟩ - g ⟨x, x.prop.2⟩ := rfl
instance instSubtractionCommMonoid : SubtractionCommMonoid (E →ₗ.[R] F) where
add_comm := add_comm
sub_eq_add_neg f g := by
ext x _ h
· rfl
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_neg := neg_neg
neg_add_rev f g := by
ext x _ h
· simp [add_domain, sub_domain, neg_domain, And.comm]
simp [sub_apply, add_apply, neg_apply, ← sub_eq_add_neg, h]
neg_eq_of_add f g h' := by
ext x hf hg
· have : (0 : E →ₗ.[R] F).domain = ⊤ := zero_domain
simp only [← h', add_domain, inf_eq_top_iff] at this
rw [neg_domain, this.1, this.2]
simp only [neg_domain, neg_apply, neg_eq_iff_add_eq_zero]
rw [ext_iff] at h'
rcases h' with ⟨hdom, h'⟩
rw [zero_domain] at hdom
simp only [hdom, neg_domain, zero_domain, mem_top, zero_apply, forall_true_left] at h'
apply h'
zsmul := zsmulRec
end Sub
section
variable {K : Type*} [DivisionRing K] [Module K E] [Module K F]
/-- Extend a `LinearPMap` to `f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x`. -/
noncomputable def supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
E →ₗ.[K] F :=
f.sup (mkSpanSingleton x y fun h₀ => hx <| h₀.symm ▸ f.domain.zero_mem) <|
sup_h_of_disjoint _ _ <| by simpa [disjoint_span_singleton] using fun h ↦ False.elim <| hx h
@[simp]
theorem domain_supSpanSingleton (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) :
(f.supSpanSingleton x y hx).domain = f.domain ⊔ K ∙ x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem supSpanSingleton_apply_mk (f : E →ₗ.[K] F) (x : E) (y : F) (hx : x ∉ f.domain) (x' : E)
(hx' : x' ∈ f.domain) (c : K) :
f.supSpanSingleton x y hx
⟨x' + c • x, mem_sup.2 ⟨x', hx', _, mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩, rfl⟩⟩ =
f ⟨x', hx'⟩ + c • y := by
unfold supSpanSingleton
rw [sup_apply _ ⟨x', hx'⟩ ⟨c • x, _⟩, mkSpanSingleton'_apply]
· exact mem_span_singleton.2 ⟨c, rfl⟩
· rfl
end
private theorem sSup_aux (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) :
∃ f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) →ₗ[R] F, (⟨_, f⟩ : E →ₗ.[R] F) ∈ upperBounds c := by
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with ceq | cne
· subst c
simp
have hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) (domain '' c) :=
directedOn_image.2 (hc.mono @(domain_mono.monotone))
have P : ∀ x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)), { p : c // (x : E) ∈ p.val.domain } := by
rintro x
apply Classical.indefiniteDescription
have := (mem_sSup_of_directed (cne.image _) hdir).1 x.2
rwa [Set.exists_mem_image, ← bex_def, SetCoe.exists'] at this
set f : ↥(sSup (domain '' c)) → F := fun x => (P x).val.val ⟨x, (P x).property⟩
have f_eq : ∀ (p : c) (x : ↥(sSup (domain '' c))) (y : p.1.1) (_hxy : (x : E) = y),
f x = p.1 y := by
intro p x y hxy
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 p.1 p.2 with ⟨q, _hqc, ⟨hxq1, hxq2⟩, ⟨hpq1, hpq2⟩⟩
exact (hxq2 (y := ⟨y, hpq1 y.2⟩) hxy).trans (hpq2 rfl).symm
use { toFun := f, map_add' := ?_, map_smul' := ?_ }, ?_
· intro x y
rcases hc (P x).1.1 (P x).1.2 (P y).1.1 (P y).1.2 with ⟨p, hpc, hpx, hpy⟩
set x' := inclusion hpx.1 ⟨x, (P x).2⟩
set y' := inclusion hpy.1 ⟨y, (P y).2⟩
rw [f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ x x' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ y y' rfl, f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ (x + y) (x' + y') rfl,
map_add]
· intro c x
simp only [RingHom.id_apply]
rw [f_eq (P x).1 (c • x) (c • ⟨x, (P x).2⟩) rfl, ← map_smul]
· intro p hpc
refine ⟨le_sSup <| Set.mem_image_of_mem domain hpc, fun x y hxy => Eq.symm ?_⟩
exact f_eq ⟨p, hpc⟩ _ _ hxy.symm
protected noncomputable def sSup (c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)) (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨_, Classical.choose <| sSup_aux c hc⟩
protected theorem le_sSup {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {f : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hf : f ∈ c) : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc :=
Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hf
protected theorem sSup_le {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {g : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hg : ∀ f ∈ c, f ≤ g) : LinearPMap.sSup c hc ≤ g :=
le_of_eqLocus_ge <|
sSup_le fun _ ⟨f, hf, Eq⟩ =>
Eq ▸
have : f ≤ LinearPMap.sSup c hc ⊓ g := le_inf (LinearPMap.le_sSup _ hf) (hg f hf)
this.1
protected theorem sSup_apply {c : Set (E →ₗ.[R] F)} (hc : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) c) {l : E →ₗ.[R] F}
(hl : l ∈ c) (x : l.domain) :
(LinearPMap.sSup c hc) ⟨x, (LinearPMap.le_sSup hc hl).1 x.2⟩ = l x := by
symm
apply (Classical.choose_spec (sSup_aux c hc) hl).2
rfl
end LinearPMap
namespace LinearMap
/-- Restrict a linear map to a submodule, reinterpreting the result as a `LinearPMap`. -/
def toPMap (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨p, f.comp p.subtype⟩
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_apply (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) (x : p) : f.toPMap p x = f x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPMap_domain (f : E →ₗ[R] F) (p : Submodule R E) : (f.toPMap p).domain = p :=
rfl
/-- Compose a linear map with a `LinearPMap` -/
def compPMap (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain
toFun := g.comp f.toFun
@[simp]
theorem compPMap_apply (g : F →ₗ[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x) : g.compPMap f x = g (f x) :=
rfl
end LinearMap
namespace LinearPMap
/-- Restrict codomain of a `LinearPMap` -/
def codRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (p : Submodule R F) (H : ∀ x, f x ∈ p) : E →ₗ.[R] p where
domain := f.domain
toFun := f.toFun.codRestrict p H
/-- Compose two `LinearPMap`s -/
def comp (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (H : ∀ x : f.domain, f x ∈ g.domain) : E →ₗ.[R] G :=
g.toFun.compPMap <| f.codRestrict _ H
/-- `f.coprod g` is the partially defined linear map defined on `f.domain × g.domain`,
and sending `p` to `f p.1 + g p.2`. -/
def coprod (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) : E × F →ₗ.[R] G where
domain := f.domain.prod g.domain
toFun :=
-- Porting note: This is just
-- `(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun +`
-- ` (g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun`,
HAdd.hAdd
(α := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(β := f.domain.prod g.domain →ₗ[R] G)
(f.comp (LinearPMap.fst f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.1).toFun
(g.comp (LinearPMap.snd f.domain g.domain) fun x => x.2.2).toFun
@[simp]
theorem coprod_apply (f : E →ₗ.[R] G) (g : F →ₗ.[R] G) (x) :
f.coprod g x = f ⟨(x : E × F).1, x.2.1⟩ + g ⟨(x : E × F).2, x.2.2⟩ :=
rfl
/-- Restrict a partially defined linear map to a submodule of `E` contained in `f.domain`. -/
def domRestrict (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (S : Submodule R E) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
⟨S ⊓ f.domain, f.toFun.comp (Submodule.inclusion (by simp))⟩
@[simp]
theorem domRestrict_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {S : Submodule R E} :
(f.domRestrict S).domain = S ⊓ f.domain :=
rfl
theorem domRestrict_apply {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} ⦃x : ↥(S ⊓ f.domain)⦄ ⦃y : f.domain⦄
(h : (x : E) = y) : f.domRestrict S x = f y := by
have : Submodule.inclusion (by simp) x = y := by
ext
simp [h]
rw [← this]
exact LinearPMap.mk_apply _ _ _
theorem domRestrict_le {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {S : Submodule R E} : f.domRestrict S ≤ f :=
⟨by simp, fun _ _ hxy => domRestrict_apply hxy⟩
/-! ### Graph -/
section Graph
/-- The graph of a `LinearPMap` viewed as a submodule on `E × F`. -/
def graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Submodule R (E × F) :=
f.toFun.graph.map (f.domain.subtype.prodMap (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))
theorem mem_graph_iff' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y, f y) = x := by simp [graph]
@[simp]
theorem mem_graph_iff (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E × F} :
x ∈ f.graph ↔ ∃ y : f.domain, (↑y : E) = x.1 ∧ f y = x.2 := by
cases x
simp_rw [mem_graph_iff', Prod.mk_inj]
/-- The tuple `(x, f x)` is contained in the graph of `f`. -/
theorem mem_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (x : domain f) : ((x : E), f x) ∈ f.graph := by simp
theorem graph_map_fst_eq_domain (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.fst R E F) = f.domain := by
ext x
simp only [Submodule.mem_map, mem_graph_iff, Subtype.exists, exists_and_left, exists_eq_left,
LinearMap.fst_apply, Prod.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right]
constructor <;> intro h
· rcases h with ⟨x, hx, _⟩
exact hx
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
simp only [h, exists_const]
theorem graph_map_snd_eq_range (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
f.graph.map (LinearMap.snd R E F) = LinearMap.range f.toFun := by ext; simp
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [DistribMulAction M F] [SMulCommClass R M F] (y : M)
/-- The graph of `z • f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem smul_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) (z : M) :
(z • f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (z • (LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext ⟨x_fst, x_snd⟩
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.smul_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.smul_apply, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.smul_apply,
Prod.mk_inj] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
/-- The graph of `-f` as a pushforward. -/
theorem neg_graph (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) :
(-f).graph =
f.graph.map ((LinearMap.id : E →ₗ[R] E).prodMap (-(LinearMap.id : F →ₗ[R] F))) := by
ext ⟨x_fst, x_snd⟩
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
rcases h with ⟨y, hy, h⟩
rw [LinearPMap.neg_apply] at h
rw [Submodule.mem_map]
simp only [mem_graph_iff, LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id,
LinearMap.neg_apply, Prod.mk_inj, Prod.exists, exists_exists_and_eq_and]
use x_fst, y, hy
rw [Submodule.mem_map] at h
rcases h with ⟨x', hx', h⟩
cases x'
simp only [LinearMap.prodMap_apply, LinearMap.id_coe, id, LinearMap.neg_apply,
Prod.mk_inj] at h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx' ⊢
rcases hx' with ⟨y, hy, hx'⟩
use y
rw [← h.1, ← h.2]
simp [hy, hx']
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E} {x' y' : F} (hx : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hy : (y, y') ∈ f.graph) (hxy : x = y) : x' = y' := by
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx hy
rcases hx with ⟨x'', hx1, hx2⟩
rcases hy with ⟨y'', hy1, hy2⟩
simp only at hx1 hx2 hy1 hy2
rw [← hx1, ← hy1, SetLike.coe_eq_coe] at hxy
rw [← hx2, ← hy2, hxy]
theorem mem_graph_snd_inj' (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x y : E × F} (hx : x ∈ f.graph) (hy : y ∈ f.graph)
(hxy : x.1 = y.1) : x.2 = y.2 := by
cases x
cases y
exact f.mem_graph_snd_inj hx hy hxy
/-- The property that `f 0 = 0` in terms of the graph. -/
theorem graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) {x : E} {x' : F} (h : (x, x') ∈ f.graph)
(hx : x = 0) : x' = 0 :=
f.mem_graph_snd_inj h f.graph.zero_mem hx
theorem mem_domain_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} : x ∈ f.domain ↔ ∃ y : F, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· use f ⟨x, h⟩
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, h⟩
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
obtain ⟨x', h⟩ := h
simp only at h
rw [← h.1]
simp
theorem mem_domain_of_mem_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (h : (x, y) ∈ f.graph) :
x ∈ f.domain := by
rw [mem_domain_iff]
exact ⟨y, h⟩
theorem image_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {x : E} {y : F} (hx : x ∈ f.domain) :
y = f ⟨x, hx⟩ ↔ (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
rw [mem_graph_iff]
constructor <;> intro h
· use ⟨x, hx⟩
simp [h]
rcases h with ⟨⟨x', hx'⟩, ⟨h1, h2⟩⟩
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at h1 h2
simp only [← h2, h1]
theorem mem_range_iff {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} {y : F} : y ∈ Set.range f ↔ ∃ x : E, (x, y) ∈ f.graph := by
constructor <;> intro h
· rw [Set.mem_range] at h
rcases h with ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, h⟩
use x
rw [← h]
exact f.mem_graph ⟨x, hx⟩
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := h
rw [mem_graph_iff] at h
obtain ⟨x, h⟩ := h
rw [Set.mem_range]
use x
simp only at h
rw [h.2]
theorem mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) {x : E} :
x ∈ f.domain ↔ x ∈ g.domain := by simp_rw [mem_domain_iff, h]
theorem le_of_le_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph ≤ g.graph) : f ≤ g := by
constructor
· intro x hx
rw [mem_domain_iff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hx⟩ := hx
use y
exact h hx
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩ ⟨y, hy⟩ hxy
rw [image_iff]
refine h ?_
simp only [Submodule.coe_mk] at hxy
rw [hxy] at hx
rw [← image_iff hx]
simp [hxy]
theorem le_graph_of_le {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f ≤ g) : f.graph ≤ g.graph := by
intro x hx
rw [mem_graph_iff] at hx ⊢
obtain ⟨y, hx⟩ := hx
use ⟨y, h.1 y.2⟩
simp only [hx, Submodule.coe_mk, eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
convert hx.2 using 1
refine (h.2 ?_).symm
simp only [hx.1, Submodule.coe_mk]
theorem le_graph_iff {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} : f.graph ≤ g.graph ↔ f ≤ g :=
⟨le_of_le_graph, le_graph_of_le⟩
theorem eq_of_eq_graph {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (h : f.graph = g.graph) : f = g := by
apply dExt
· ext
exact mem_domain_iff_of_eq_graph h
· apply (le_of_le_graph h.le).2
end Graph
end LinearPMap
namespace Submodule
section SubmoduleToLinearPMap
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/LinearPMap.lean | 858 | 862 | theorem existsUnique_from_graph {g : Submodule R (E × F)}
(hg : ∀ {x : E × F} (_hx : x ∈ g) (_hx' : x.fst = 0), x.snd = 0) {a : E}
(ha : a ∈ g.map (LinearMap.fst R E F)) : ∃! b : F, (a, b) ∈ g := by | refine existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique ?_ ?_
· convert ha |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← exists_range_iff, range_image]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem forall_subset_range_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∀ s, s ⊆ range f → p s) ↔ ∀ s, p (f '' s) := by
rw [← forall_mem_range, range_image]; simp only [mem_powerset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
constructor
· intro h x hx
rcases hs hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact h hx
intro h x; apply h
theorem preimage_eq_preimage' {s t : Set α} {f : β → α} (hs : s ⊆ range f) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t := by
constructor
· intro h
apply Subset.antisymm
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff hs, h]
· rw [← preimage_subset_preimage_iff ht, h]
rintro rfl; rfl
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_inter_range {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ range f) = f ⁻¹' s :=
Set.ext fun x => and_iff_left ⟨x, rfl⟩
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem preimage_range_inter {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (range f ∩ s) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [inter_comm, preimage_inter_range]
theorem preimage_image_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' (f ⁻¹' s)) = f ⁻¹' s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, preimage_range_inter]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id : range (@id α) = univ :=
range_eq_univ.2 surjective_id
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem range_id' : (range fun x : α => x) = univ :=
range_id
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_fst [Nonempty β] : range (Prod.fst : α × β → α) = univ :=
Prod.fst_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Prod.range_snd [Nonempty α] : range (Prod.snd : α × β → β) = univ :=
Prod.snd_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_eval {α : ι → Sort _} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)] (i : ι) :
range (eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) = univ :=
(surjective_eval i).range_eq
theorem range_inl : range (@Sum.inl α β) = {x | Sum.isLeft x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem range_inr : range (@Sum.inr α β) = {x | Sum.isRight x} := by ext (_|_) <;> simp
theorem isCompl_range_inl_range_inr : IsCompl (range <| @Sum.inl α β) (range Sum.inr) :=
IsCompl.of_le
(by
rintro y ⟨⟨x₁, rfl⟩, ⟨x₂, h⟩⟩
exact Sum.noConfusion h)
(by rintro (x | y) - <;> [left; right] <;> exact mem_range_self _)
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_union_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inr = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inl_inter_range_inr : range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inr = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_union_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∪ range Sum.inl = univ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem range_inr_inter_range_inl : range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) ∩ range Sum.inl = ∅ :=
isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm.inf_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_image_inr (s : Set β) : Sum.inl ⁻¹' (@Sum.inr α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_image_inl (s : Set α) : Sum.inr ⁻¹' (@Sum.inl α β '' s) = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inl_range_inr : Sum.inl ⁻¹' range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inl_image_inr]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_inr_range_inl : Sum.inr ⁻¹' range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) = ∅ := by
rw [← image_univ, preimage_inr_image_inl]
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inl : (range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_inr : (range (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β))ᶜ = range (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) :=
IsCompl.compl_eq isCompl_range_inl_range_inr.symm
theorem image_preimage_inl_union_image_preimage_inr (s : Set (α ⊕ β)) :
Sum.inl '' (Sum.inl ⁻¹' s) ∪ Sum.inr '' (Sum.inr ⁻¹' s) = s := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_inter_range, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← inter_union_distrib_left,
range_inl_union_range_inr, inter_univ]
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_mk (r : α → α → Prop) : range (Quot.mk r) = univ :=
Quot.mk_surjective.range_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_quot_lift {r : ι → ι → Prop} (hf : ∀ x y, r x y → f x = f y) :
range (Quot.lift f hf) = range f :=
ext fun _ => Quot.mk_surjective.exists
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift [s : Setoid ι] (hf) :
range (Quotient.lift f hf : Quotient s → α) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_mk' {s : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk' : α → Quotient s) = univ :=
range_quot_mk _
lemma Quotient.range_mk'' {sa : Setoid α} : range (Quotient.mk'' (s₁ := sa)) = univ :=
range_quotient_mk
@[simp]
theorem range_quotient_lift_on' {s : Setoid ι} (hf) :
(range fun x : Quotient s => Quotient.liftOn' x f hf) = range f :=
range_quot_lift _
instance canLift (c) (p) [CanLift α β c p] :
CanLift (Set α) (Set β) (c '' ·) fun s => ∀ x ∈ s, p x where
prf _ hs := subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.mp fun x hx => CanLift.prf _ (hs x hx)
theorem range_const_subset {c : α} : (range fun _ : ι => c) ⊆ {c} :=
range_subset_iff.2 fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_const : ∀ [Nonempty ι] {c : α}, (range fun _ : ι => c) = {c}
| ⟨x⟩, _ =>
(Subset.antisymm range_const_subset) fun _ hy =>
(mem_singleton_iff.1 hy).symm ▸ mem_range_self x
theorem range_subtype_map {p : α → Prop} {q : β → Prop} (f : α → β) (h : ∀ x, p x → q (f x)) :
range (Subtype.map f h) = (↑) ⁻¹' (f '' { x | p x }) := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_preimage, mem_range, mem_image, Subtype.exists, Subtype.map]
simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq, exists_prop, mem_setOf_eq]
theorem image_swap_eq_preimage_swap : image (@Prod.swap α β) = preimage Prod.swap :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse Prod.swap_leftInverse Prod.swap_rightInverse
theorem preimage_singleton_nonempty {f : α → β} {y : β} : (f ⁻¹' {y}).Nonempty ↔ y ∈ range f :=
Iff.rfl
theorem preimage_singleton_eq_empty {f : α → β} {y : β} : f ⁻¹' {y} = ∅ ↔ y ∉ range f :=
not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.symm.trans preimage_singleton_nonempty.not
theorem range_subset_singleton {f : ι → α} {x : α} : range f ⊆ {x} ↔ f = const ι x := by
simp [range_subset_iff, funext_iff, mem_singleton]
theorem image_compl_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ = range f \ s := by
rw [compl_eq_univ_diff, image_diff_preimage, image_univ]
theorem rangeFactorization_eq {f : ι → β} : Subtype.val ∘ rangeFactorization f = f :=
funext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem rangeFactorization_coe (f : ι → β) (a : ι) : (rangeFactorization f a : β) = f a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_comp_rangeFactorization (f : ι → β) : (↑) ∘ rangeFactorization f = f := rfl
theorem surjective_onto_range : Surjective (rangeFactorization f) := fun ⟨_, ⟨i, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨i, rfl⟩
theorem image_eq_range (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : f '' s = range fun x : s => f x := by
ext
constructor
· rintro ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
exact ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨x, h1⟩, h2⟩
exact ⟨x, h1, h2⟩
theorem _root_.Sum.range_eq (f : α ⊕ β → γ) :
range f = range (f ∘ Sum.inl) ∪ range (f ∘ Sum.inr) :=
ext fun _ => Sum.exists
@[simp]
theorem Sum.elim_range (f : α → γ) (g : β → γ) : range (Sum.elim f g) = range f ∪ range g :=
Sum.range_eq _
theorem range_ite_subset' {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {f g : α → β} :
range (if p then f else g) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
by_cases h : p
· rw [if_pos h]
exact subset_union_left
· rw [if_neg h]
exact subset_union_right
theorem range_ite_subset {p : α → Prop} [DecidablePred p] {f g : α → β} :
(range fun x => if p x then f x else g x) ⊆ range f ∪ range g := by
rw [range_subset_iff]; intro x; by_cases h : p x
· simp only [if_pos h, mem_union, mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply, true_or]
· simp [if_neg h, mem_union, mem_range_self]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_range (f : α → β) : f ⁻¹' range f = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall mem_range_self
/-- The range of a function from a `Unique` type contains just the
function applied to its single value. -/
theorem range_unique [h : Unique ι] : range f = {f default} := by
ext x
rw [mem_range]
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [h.uniq i] at hi
exact hi ▸ mem_singleton _
· exact fun h => ⟨default, h.symm⟩
theorem range_diff_image_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
fun _ ⟨⟨x, h₁⟩, h₂⟩ => ⟨x, fun h => h₂ ⟨x, h, h₁⟩, h₁⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_inclusion (h : s ⊆ t) : range (inclusion h) = { x : t | (x : α) ∈ s } := by
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp
-- When `f` is injective, see also `Equiv.ofInjective`.
theorem leftInverse_rangeSplitting (f : α → β) :
LeftInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) := fun x => by
ext
simp only [rangeFactorization_coe]
apply apply_rangeSplitting
theorem rangeSplitting_injective (f : α → β) : Injective (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).injective
theorem rightInverse_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (h : Injective f) :
RightInverse (rangeFactorization f) (rangeSplitting f) :=
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f).rightInverse_of_injective fun _ _ hxy =>
h <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 hxy
theorem preimage_rangeSplitting {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
preimage (rangeSplitting f) = image (rangeFactorization f) :=
(image_eq_preimage_of_inverse (rightInverse_rangeSplitting hf)
(leftInverse_rangeSplitting f)).symm
theorem isCompl_range_some_none (α : Type*) : IsCompl (range (some : α → Option α)) {none} :=
IsCompl.of_le (fun _ ⟨⟨_, ha⟩, (hn : _ = none)⟩ => Option.some_ne_none _ (ha.trans hn))
fun x _ => Option.casesOn x (Or.inr rfl) fun _ => Or.inl <| mem_range_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_range_some (α : Type*) : (range (some : α → Option α))ᶜ = {none} :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem range_some_inter_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∩ {none} = ∅ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).inf_eq_bot
-- Not `@[simp]` since `simp` can prove this.
theorem range_some_union_none (α : Type*) : range (some : α → Option α) ∪ {none} = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).sup_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem insert_none_range_some (α : Type*) : insert none (range (some : α → Option α)) = univ :=
(isCompl_range_some_none α).symm.sup_eq_top
lemma image_of_range_union_range_eq_univ {α β γ γ' δ δ' : Type*}
{h : β → α} {f : γ → β} {f₁ : γ' → α} {f₂ : γ → γ'} {g : δ → β} {g₁ : δ' → α} {g₂ : δ → δ'}
(hf : h ∘ f = f₁ ∘ f₂) (hg : h ∘ g = g₁ ∘ g₂) (hfg : range f ∪ range g = univ) (s : Set β) :
h '' s = f₁ '' (f₂ '' (f ⁻¹' s)) ∪ g₁ '' (g₂ '' (g ⁻¹' s)) := by
rw [← image_comp, ← image_comp, ← hf, ← hg, image_comp, image_comp, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_union, ← inter_union_distrib_left, hfg, inter_univ]
end Range
section Subsingleton
variable {s : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- The image of a subsingleton is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.image (hs : s.Subsingleton) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Subsingleton :=
fun _ ⟨_, hx, Hx⟩ _ ⟨_, hy, Hy⟩ => Hx ▸ Hy ▸ congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
/-- The preimage of a subsingleton under an injective map is a subsingleton. -/
theorem Subsingleton.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Subsingleton)
(hf : Function.Injective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton := fun _ ha _ hb => hf <| hs ha hb
/-- If the image of a set under an injective map is a subsingleton, the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_image (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set α)
(hs : (f '' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton :=
(hs.preimage hf).anti <| subset_preimage_image _ _
/-- If the preimage of a set under a surjective map is a subsingleton,
the set is a subsingleton. -/
theorem subsingleton_of_preimage (hf : Function.Surjective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Subsingleton) : s.Subsingleton := fun fx hx fy hy => by
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact congr_arg f (hs hx hy)
theorem subsingleton_range {α : Sort*} [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : (range f).Subsingleton :=
forall_mem_range.2 fun x => forall_mem_range.2 fun y => congr_arg f (Subsingleton.elim x y)
/-- The preimage of a nontrivial set under a surjective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nontrivial)
(hf : Function.Surjective f) : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial := by
rcases hs with ⟨fx, hx, fy, hy, hxy⟩
rcases hf fx, hf fy with ⟨⟨x, rfl⟩, ⟨y, rfl⟩⟩
exact ⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
/-- The image of a nontrivial set under an injective map is nontrivial. -/
theorem Nontrivial.image (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial :=
let ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem f hy, hf.ne hxy⟩
theorem Nontrivial.image_of_injOn (hs : s.Nontrivial) (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial := by
obtain ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩ := hs
exact ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem _ hx, f y, mem_image_of_mem _ hy, (hxy <| hf hx hy ·)⟩
/-- If the image of a set is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (hs : (f '' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
let ⟨_, ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩, _, ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩, hxy⟩ := hs
⟨x, hx, y, hy, mt (congr_arg f) hxy⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nontrivial (hf : f.Injective) : (f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image hf⟩
@[simp]
theorem InjOn.image_nontrivial_iff (hf : s.InjOn f) :
(f '' s).Nontrivial ↔ s.Nontrivial :=
⟨nontrivial_of_image f s, fun h ↦ h.image_of_injOn hf⟩
/-- If the preimage of a set under an injective map is nontrivial, the set is nontrivial. -/
theorem nontrivial_of_preimage (hf : Function.Injective f) (s : Set β)
(hs : (f ⁻¹' s).Nontrivial) : s.Nontrivial :=
(hs.image hf).mono <| image_preimage_subset _ _
end Subsingleton
end Set
namespace Function
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {f : α → β}
open Set
theorem Surjective.preimage_injective (hf : Surjective f) : Injective (preimage f) := fun _ _ =>
(preimage_eq_preimage hf).1
theorem Injective.preimage_image (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
preimage_image_eq s hf
theorem Injective.preimage_surjective (hf : Injective f) : Surjective (preimage f) :=
Set.preimage_surjective.mpr hf
theorem Injective.subsingleton_image_iff (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} :
(f '' s).Subsingleton ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
⟨subsingleton_of_image hf s, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Surjective.image_preimage (hf : Surjective f) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
image_preimage_eq s hf
theorem Surjective.image_surjective (hf : Surjective f) : Surjective (image f) := by
intro s
use f ⁻¹' s
rw [hf.image_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem Surjective.nonempty_preimage (hf : Surjective f) {s : Set β} :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty := by rw [← image_nonempty, hf.image_preimage]
theorem Injective.image_injective (hf : Injective f) : Injective (image f) := by
intro s t h
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, h]
lemma Injective.image_strictMono (inj : Function.Injective f) : StrictMono (image f) :=
monotone_image.strictMono_of_injective inj.image_injective
theorem Surjective.preimage_subset_preimage_iff {s t : Set β} (hf : Surjective f) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
apply Set.preimage_subset_preimage_iff
rw [hf.range_eq]
apply subset_univ
theorem Surjective.range_comp {ι' : Sort*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Surjective f) (g : ι' → α) :
range (g ∘ f) = range g :=
ext fun y => (@Surjective.exists _ _ _ hf fun x => g x = y).symm
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 1,117 | 1,129 | theorem Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique (hf : Injective f) {b : β} :
b ∈ range f ↔ ∃! a, f a = b :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨a, h, fun _ ha => hf (ha.trans h.symm)⟩, ExistsUnique.exists⟩
alias ⟨Injective.existsUnique_of_mem_range, _⟩ := Injective.mem_range_iff_existsUnique
theorem Injective.compl_image_eq (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s)ᶜ = f '' sᶜ ∪ (range f)ᶜ := by | ext y
rcases em (y ∈ range f) with (⟨x, rfl⟩ | hx)
· simp [hf.eq_iff]
· rw [mem_range, not_exists] at hx
simp [hx] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearPMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.Basic
/-!
# Partially defined linear operators over topological vector spaces
We define basic notions of partially defined linear operators, which we call unbounded operators
for short.
In this file we prove all elementary properties of unbounded operators that do not assume that the
underlying spaces are normed.
## Main definitions
* `LinearPMap.IsClosed`: An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed.
* `LinearPMap.IsClosable`: An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a
graph.
* `LinearPMap.closure`: For a closable unbounded operator `f : LinearPMap R E F` the closure is
the smallest closed extension of `f`. If `f` is not closable, then `f.closure` is defined as `f`.
* `LinearPMap.HasCore`: a submodule contained in the domain is a core if restricting to the core
does not lose information about the unbounded operator.
## Main statements
* `LinearPMap.closable_iff_exists_closed_extension`: an unbounded operator is closable iff it has a
closed extension.
* `LinearPMap.closable.existsUnique`: there exists a unique closure
* `LinearPMap.closureHasCore`: the domain of `f` is a core of its closure
## References
* [J. Weidmann, *Linear Operators in Hilbert Spaces*][weidmann_linear]
## Tags
Unbounded operators, closed operators
-/
open Topology
variable {R E F : Type*}
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup F]
variable [Module R E] [Module R F]
variable [TopologicalSpace E] [TopologicalSpace F]
namespace LinearPMap
/-! ### Closed and closable operators -/
/-- An unbounded operator is closed iff its graph is closed. -/
def IsClosed (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
_root_.IsClosed (f.graph : Set (E × F))
variable [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousAdd F]
variable [TopologicalSpace R] [ContinuousSMul R E] [ContinuousSMul R F]
/-- An unbounded operator is closable iff the closure of its graph is a graph. -/
def IsClosable (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : Prop :=
∃ f' : LinearPMap R E F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph
/-- A closed operator is trivially closable. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosable {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosed) : f.IsClosable :=
⟨f, hf.submodule_topologicalClosure_eq⟩
/-- If `g` has a closable extension `f`, then `g` itself is closable. -/
theorem IsClosable.leIsClosable {f g : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) (hfg : g ≤ f) :
g.IsClosable := by
obtain ⟨f', hf⟩ := hf
have : g.graph.topologicalClosure ≤ f'.graph := by
rw [← hf]
exact Submodule.topologicalClosure_mono (le_graph_of_le hfg)
use g.graph.topologicalClosure.toLinearPMap
rw [Submodule.toLinearPMap_graph_eq]
exact fun _ hx hx' => f'.graph_fst_eq_zero_snd (this hx) hx'
/-- The closure is unique. -/
theorem IsClosable.existsUnique {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
∃! f' : E →ₗ.[R] F, f.graph.topologicalClosure = f'.graph := by
refine existsUnique_of_exists_of_unique hf fun _ _ hy₁ hy₂ => eq_of_eq_graph ?_
rw [← hy₁, ← hy₂]
open Classical in
/-- If `f` is closable, then `f.closure` is the closure. Otherwise it is defined
as `f.closure = f`. -/
noncomputable def closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : E →ₗ.[R] F :=
if hf : f.IsClosable then hf.choose else f
theorem closure_def {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) : f.closure = hf.choose := by
simp [closure, hf]
theorem closure_def' {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : ¬f.IsClosable) : f.closure = f := by simp [closure, hf]
/-- The closure (as a submodule) of the graph is equal to the graph of the closure
(as a `LinearPMap`). -/
theorem IsClosable.graph_closure_eq_closure_graph {f : E →ₗ.[R] F} (hf : f.IsClosable) :
f.graph.topologicalClosure = f.closure.graph := by
rw [closure_def hf]
exact hf.choose_spec
/-- A `LinearPMap` is contained in its closure. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/Module/LinearPMap.lean | 107 | 107 | theorem le_closure (f : E →ₗ.[R] F) : f ≤ f.closure := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# Angles between vectors
This file defines unoriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `InnerProductGeometry.angle` is the undirected angle between two vectors.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
/-- The undirected angle between two vectors. If either vector is 0,
this is π/2. See `Orientation.oangle` for the corresponding oriented angle
definition. -/
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x := by
unfold angle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
/-- The angle between two vectors does not depend on their order. -/
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
/-- The angle between the negation of two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
/-- The angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
/-- The angle between two vectors is at most π. -/
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem sin_angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ sin (angle x y) :=
sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (angle_nonneg x y) (angle_le_pi x y)
/-- The angle between a vector and the negation of another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
/-- The angle between the negation of a vector and another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
/-- The angle between the zero vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
/-- The angle between a vector and the zero vector. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 112 | 113 | theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by | unfold angle |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov, Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs
/-!
# Intervals
In any preorder, we define intervals (which on each side can be either infinite, open or closed)
using the following naming conventions:
- `i`: infinite
- `o`: open
- `c`: closed
Each interval has the name `I` + letter for left side + letter for right side.
For instance, `Ioc a b` denotes the interval `(a, b]`.
The definitions can be found in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Defs`.
This file contains basic facts on inclusion of and set operations on intervals
(where the precise statements depend on the order's properties;
statements requiring `LinearOrder` are in `Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.LinearOrder`).
TODO: This is just the beginning; a lot of rules are missing
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
variable {α : Type*}
namespace Set
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
instance decidableMemIoo [Decidable (a < x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioo a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIco [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ico a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIio [Decidable (x < b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iio b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIcc [Decidable (a ≤ x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Icc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIic [Decidable (x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Iic b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoc [Decidable (a < x ∧ x ≤ b)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioc a b) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIci [Decidable (a ≤ x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ici a) := by assumption
instance decidableMemIoi [Decidable (a < x)] : Decidable (x ∈ Ioi a) := by assumption
theorem left_mem_Ioo : a ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem left_mem_Ioc : a ∈ Ioc a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem left_mem_Ici : a ∈ Ici a := by simp
theorem right_mem_Ioo : b ∈ Ioo a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Ico : b ∈ Ico a b ↔ False := by simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp [le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Iic : a ∈ Iic a := by simp
@[simp]
theorem Ici_toDual : Ici (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iic a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ici := Ici_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iic_toDual : Iic (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ici a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iic := Iic_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_toDual : Ioi (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Iio a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioi := Ioi_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Iio_toDual : Iio (toDual a) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioi a :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Iio := Iio_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Icc_toDual : Icc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Icc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Icc := Icc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_toDual : Ioc (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ico b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioc := Ioc_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ico_toDual : Ico (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioc b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ico := Ico_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_toDual : Ioo (toDual a) (toDual b) = ofDual ⁻¹' Ioo b a :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")]
alias dual_Ioo := Ioo_toDual
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ici (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iic x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iic (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ici x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Ioi (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Iio x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Iio_ofDual {x : αᵒᵈ} : Iio (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioi x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Icc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Icc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ico_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ico (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioc x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioc (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ico x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_ofDual {x y : αᵒᵈ} : Ioo (ofDual y) (ofDual x) = toDual ⁻¹' Ioo x y :=
Set.ext fun _ => and_comm
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Icc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_lt hx.2, fun h => ⟨a, left_mem_Ico.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => hx.1.trans_le hx.2, fun h => ⟨b, right_mem_Ioc.2 h⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, left_mem_Ici⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty :=
⟨a, right_mem_Iic⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ha, hb⟩ => ha.trans hb, exists_between⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] : (Ioi a).Nonempty :=
exists_gt a
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Iio [NoMinOrder α] : (Iio a).Nonempty :=
exists_lt a
theorem nonempty_Icc_subtype (h : a ≤ b) : Nonempty (Icc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Icc.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ico_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ico a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ico.mpr h)
theorem nonempty_Ioc_subtype (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioc a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioc.mpr h)
/-- An interval `Ici a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ici_subtype : Nonempty (Ici a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ici
/-- An interval `Iic a` is nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iic_subtype : Nonempty (Iic a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iic
theorem nonempty_Ioo_subtype [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : Nonempty (Ioo a b) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype (nonempty_Ioo.mpr h)
/-- In an order without maximal elements, the intervals `Ioi` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Ioi_subtype [NoMaxOrder α] : Nonempty (Ioi a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Ioi
/-- In an order without minimal elements, the intervals `Iio` are nonempty. -/
instance nonempty_Iio_subtype [NoMinOrder α] : Nonempty (Iio a) :=
Nonempty.to_subtype nonempty_Iio
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iio a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, lt_trans hb a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMinOrder α] : NoMinOrder (Iic a) :=
⟨fun a =>
let ⟨b, hb⟩ := exists_lt (a : α)
⟨⟨b, hb.le.trans a.2⟩, hb⟩⟩
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ioi a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iio (toDual a))
instance [NoMaxOrder α] : NoMaxOrder (Ici a) :=
OrderDual.noMaxOrder (α := Iic (toDual a))
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty (h : ¬a ≤ b) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_lt hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans_le hb)
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => h (ha.trans hb)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem Ico_self (a : α) : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self (a : α) : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self (a : α) : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h <| left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans hx⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_subset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a where
mp h := by
obtain ⟨ab, c, cb, ac⟩ := ssubset_iff_exists.mp h
exact lt_of_le_not_le (Ici_subset_Ici.mp ab) (fun h' ↦ ac (h'.trans cb))
mpr h := (ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ici_subset_Ici.mpr h.le)).mpr
⟨b, right_mem_Iic, fun h' => h.not_le h'⟩
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Ici_ssubset_Ici_of_le⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b :=
@Ici_subset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_subset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b :=
@Ici_ssubset_Ici αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Iic_ssubset_Iic_of_le⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ioi : Ici a ⊆ Ioi b ↔ b < a :=
⟨fun h => h left_mem_Ici, fun h _ hx => h.trans_le hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iio : Iic a ⊆ Iio b ↔ a < b :=
⟨fun h => h right_mem_Iic, fun h _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt hx h⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, hx₂.trans_le h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans hx₁, le_trans hx₂ h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := fun _ hx =>
⟨ha.trans_le hx.1, hx.2.trans_lt hb⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := fun _ => And.right
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (h₁ : a₂ ≤ a₁) (h₂ : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := fun _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ =>
⟨h₁.trans_lt hx₁, hx₂.trans h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h₁ : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := fun _ =>
And.imp_left h₁.trans_le
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h' => h'.trans_lt h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h₁ : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := fun _ =>
And.imp_right fun h₂ => h₂.trans_lt h₁
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_right le_of_lt
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := fun _ => And.imp_left le_of_lt
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Subset.trans Ioo_subset_Ico_self Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := fun _ => And.right
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := fun _ => And.left
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊂ Ici a :=
⟨Ioi_subset_Ici_self, fun h => lt_irrefl a (h le_rfl)⟩
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊂ Iic a :=
@Ioi_ssubset_Ici_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans hx, hx'.trans_lt h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩).1, (h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩).2⟩, fun ⟨h, h'⟩ _ ⟨hx, hx'⟩ =>
⟨h.trans_le hx, hx'.trans h'⟩⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iio_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iio b₂ ↔ b₁ < b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans_lt h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ioi_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioi a₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans_le hx⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Iic b₂ ↔ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨h₁, le_rfl⟩, fun h _ ⟨_, hx'⟩ => hx'.trans h⟩
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ici a₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ :=
⟨fun h => h ⟨le_rfl, h₁⟩, fun h _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => h.trans hx⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc (le_of_lt ha) hb)).mpr
⟨a₂, left_mem_Icc.mpr hI, not_and.mpr fun f _ => lt_irrefl a₂ (ha.trans_le f)⟩
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Icc_subset_Icc ha (le_of_lt hb))).mpr
⟨b₂, right_mem_Icc.mpr hI, fun f => lt_irrefl b₁ (hb.trans_le f.2)⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := fun _ hx => h.trans_lt hx
/-- If `a < b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊂ (a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Ioi_ssubset_Ioi_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Ioi_subset_Ioi h.le)).mpr ⟨b, h, lt_irrefl b⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(b, +∞) ⊆ [a, +∞)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Ioi_subset_Ici_iff`. -/
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ici a :=
Subset.trans (Ioi_subset_Ioi h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := fun _ hx => lt_of_lt_of_le hx h
/-- If `a < b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊂ (-∞, b)`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in linear orders, use `Iio_ssubset_Iio_iff`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b :=
(ssubset_iff_of_subset (Iio_subset_Iio h.le)).mpr ⟨a, h, lt_irrefl a⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `(-∞, a) ⊆ (-∞, b]`. In preorders, this is just an implication. If you need
the equivalence in dense linear orders, use `Iio_subset_Iic_iff`. -/
theorem Iio_subset_Iic (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iic b :=
Subset.trans (Iio_subset_Iio h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ici_inter_Iic : Ici a ∩ Iic b = Icc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ici_inter_Iio : Ici a ∩ Iio b = Ico a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iic : Ioi a ∩ Iic b = Ioc a b :=
rfl
theorem Ioi_inter_Iio : Ioi a ∩ Iio b = Ioo a b :=
rfl
theorem Iic_inter_Ici : Iic a ∩ Ici b = Icc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ici : Iio a ∩ Ici b = Ico b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iic_inter_Ioi : Iic a ∩ Ioi b = Ioc b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem Iio_inter_Ioi : Iio a ∩ Ioi b = Ioo b a :=
inter_comm _ _
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ico_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ico a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self h
theorem mem_Ioc_of_Ioo (h : x ∈ Ioo a b) : x ∈ Ioc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ico (h : x ∈ Ico a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Icc_of_Ioc (h : x ∈ Ioc a b) : x ∈ Icc a b :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self h
theorem mem_Ici_of_Ioi (h : x ∈ Ioi a) : x ∈ Ici a :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self h
theorem mem_Iic_of_Iio (h : x ∈ Iio a) : x ∈ Iic a :=
Iio_subset_Iic_self h
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Icc]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ico]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioc]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, not_iff_not, nonempty_Ioo]
theorem _root_.IsTop.Iic_eq (h : IsTop a) : Iic a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
theorem _root_.IsBot.Ici_eq (h : IsBot a) : Ici a = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall h
@[simp] theorem Ioi_eq_empty_iff : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
simp only [isMax_iff_forall_not_lt, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_Ioi]
@[simp] theorem Iio_eq_empty_iff : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.Ioi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.Iio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty_iff
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iic_inter_Ioc_of_le (h : a ≤ c) : Iic a ∩ Ioc b c = Ioc b a :=
ext fun _ => ⟨fun H => ⟨H.2.1, H.1⟩, fun H => ⟨H.2, H.1, H.2.trans h⟩⟩
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Icc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Icc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_lt (ha : c < a) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => ha.not_le h.1
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_gt (hb : b < c) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => hb.not_le h.2
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self : a ∉ Ioi a := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Iio_self : b ∉ Iio b := lt_irrefl _
theorem not_mem_Ioc_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ico_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_le (ha : c ≤ a) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.1.trans_le ha
theorem not_mem_Ioo_of_ge (hb : b ≤ c) : c ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ <| h.2.trans_le hb
section matched_intervals
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Icc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Icc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Icc_eq_empty h, Ioo_eq_empty (mt le_of_lt h)]
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioc_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h b
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ioc_eq_empty h]
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff : Ioo a b = Ico a b ↔ ¬a < b where
mp h := by simpa using Set.ext_iff.mp h a
mpr h := by rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h]
-- Mirrored versions of the above for `simp`.
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioc a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ico a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioo_eq_Icc_same_iff : Ioo a b = Icc a b ↔ ¬a ≤ b :=
eq_comm.trans Icc_eq_Ioo_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioc_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioc a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioc_eq_Ico_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ioc_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ioc a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ioc_same_iff
@[simp] theorem Ico_eq_Ioo_same_iff : Ico a b = Ioo a b ↔ ¬a < b :=
eq_comm.trans Ioo_eq_Ico_same_iff
end matched_intervals
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} :=
Set.ext <| by simp [Icc, le_antisymm_iff, and_comm]
instance instIccUnique : Unique (Set.Icc a a) where
default := ⟨a, by simp⟩
uniq y := Subtype.ext <| by simpa using y.2
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· have hab : a ≤ b := nonempty_Icc.1 (h.symm.subst <| singleton_nonempty c)
exact
⟨eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ left_mem_Icc.2 hab,
eq_of_mem_singleton <| h ▸ right_mem_Icc.2 hab⟩
· rintro ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
exact Icc_self _
lemma subsingleton_Icc_of_ge (hba : b ≤ a) : Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) :=
fun _x ⟨hax, hxb⟩ _y ⟨hay, hyb⟩ ↦ le_antisymm
(le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hxb hay hba) (le_implies_le_of_le_of_le hyb hax hba)
@[simp] lemma subsingleton_Icc_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} :
Set.Subsingleton (Icc a b) ↔ b ≤ a := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, subsingleton_Icc_of_ge⟩
contrapose! h
simp only [gt_iff_lt, not_subsingleton_iff]
exact ⟨a, ⟨le_refl _, h.le⟩, b, ⟨h.le, le_refl _⟩, h.ne⟩
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_left : Icc a b \ {a} = Ioc a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm, and_right_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_right : Icc a b \ {b} = Ico a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_left : Ico a b \ {a} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_right_comm, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_right : Ioc a b \ {b} = Ioo a b :=
ext fun x => by simp [and_assoc, ← lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by
rw [insert_eq, ← diff_diff, Icc_diff_left, Ioc_diff_right]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_diff_left : Ici a \ {a} = Ioi a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_diff_right : Iic a \ {a} = Iio a :=
ext fun x => by simp [lt_iff_le_and_ne]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ico_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Ico.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_same (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Ioc.2 h)]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| right_mem_Icc.2 h)]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Set/Basic.lean | 708 | 709 | theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_same (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by | rw [← Icc_diff_left, diff_diff_cancel_left (singleton_subset_iff.2 <| left_mem_Icc.2 h)] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# The derivative of a linear equivalence
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
continuous linear equivalences.
We also prove the usual formula for the derivative of the inverse function, assuming it exists.
The inverse function theorem is in `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {c : F}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv_comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp' (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) =
fun x ↦ (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp L f x
theorem comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.differentiableWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 ((f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.differentiableWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
rwa [Function.comp_assoc, iso.self_comp_symm] at this
theorem comp_right_differentiableAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f (iso x) := by
simp only [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff,
preimage_univ]
theorem comp_right_differentiableOn_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
refine ⟨fun H y hy => ?_, fun H y hy => iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.2 (H _ hy)⟩
rw [← iso.apply_symm_apply y, ← comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
apply H
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
theorem comp_right_differentiable_iff {f : F → G} :
Differentiable 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
simp only [← differentiableOn_univ, ← iso.comp_right_differentiableOn_iff, preimage_univ]
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s (iso x) := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => H.comp x iso.hasFDerivWithinAt (mapsTo_preimage _ s)⟩
rw [← iso.symm_apply_apply x] at H
have A : f = (f ∘ iso) ∘ iso.symm := by
rw [Function.comp_assoc, iso.self_comp_symm]
rfl
have B : f' = (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)).comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) := by
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
rw [A, B]
apply H.comp (iso x) iso.symm.hasFDerivWithinAt
intro y hy
simpa only [mem_preimage, apply_symm_apply] using hy
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : F →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) (f'.comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F)) x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, preimage_univ]
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (f ∘ iso) f' (iso ⁻¹' s) x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) s (iso x) := by
rw [← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc,
iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_id]
theorem comp_right_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : F → G} {x : E} {f' : E →L[𝕜] G} :
HasFDerivAt (f ∘ iso) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f (f'.comp (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E)) (iso x) := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff', preimage_univ]
theorem comp_right_fderivWithin {f : F → G} {s : Set F} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ⁻¹' s) x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 f s (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s (iso x)
· exact (iso.comp_right_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff.2 h.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) (iso ⁻¹' s) x := by
intro h'
exact h (iso.comp_right_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h')
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.zero_comp]
theorem comp_right_fderiv {f : F → G} {x : E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (f ∘ iso) x = (fderiv 𝕜 f (iso x)).comp (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ, ← iso.comp_right_fderivWithin, preimage_univ]
exact uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
end ContinuousLinearEquiv
namespace LinearIsometryEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear isometry equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).fderivWithin hxs
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableAt_iff
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_differentiable_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff'
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_hasFDerivAt_iff'
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderivWithin hxs
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) :=
(iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F).comp_fderiv
theorem comp_fderiv' {f : G → E} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) = fun x ↦ (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
ext x : 1
exact LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderiv iso
end LinearIsometryEquiv
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in a neighborhood of `a` within `t`,
`g` maps a neighborhood of `a` within `t` to a neighborhood of `g a` within `s`,
and `f` has an invertible derivative `f'` at `g a` within `s`,
then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a` within `t`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have an
inverse function. -/
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.of_local_left_inverse {g : F → E} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : F} {t : Set F}
(hg : Tendsto g (𝓝[t] a) (𝓝[s] (g a))) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) s (g a))
(ha : a ∈ t) (hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[t] a, f (g y) = y) :
HasFDerivWithinAt g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) t a := by
have : (fun x : F => g x - g a - f'.symm (x - a)) =O[𝓝[t] a]
fun x : F => f' (g x - g a) - (x - a) :=
((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).isBigO_comp _ _).congr (fun x ↦ by simp) fun _ ↦ rfl
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.trans_isLittleO ?_
clear this
refine ((hf.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr' (hfg.mono ?_) .rfl).trans_isBigO ?_
· intro p hp
simp [hp, hfg.self_of_nhdsWithin ha]
· refine ((hf.isBigO_sub_rev f'.antilipschitz).comp_tendsto hg).congr'
(Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl) (hfg.mono ?_)
rintro p hp
simp only [(· ∘ ·), hp, hfg.self_of_nhdsWithin ha]
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a` in the strict sense, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`
in the strict sense.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have an
inverse function. -/
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) : HasStrictFDerivAt g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a := by
replace hg := hg.prodMap' hg
replace hfg := hfg.prodMk_nhds hfg
have :
(fun p : F × F => g p.1 - g p.2 - f'.symm (p.1 - p.2)) =O[𝓝 (a, a)] fun p : F × F =>
f' (g p.1 - g p.2) - (p.1 - p.2) := by
refine ((f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).isBigO_comp _ _).congr (fun x => ?_) fun _ => rfl
simp
refine .of_isLittleO <| this.trans_isLittleO ?_
clear this
refine ((hf.isLittleO.comp_tendsto hg).symm.congr'
(hfg.mono ?_) (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl)).trans_isBigO ?_
· rintro p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩
simp [hp1, hp2]
· refine (hf.isBigO_sub_rev.comp_tendsto hg).congr' (Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl)
(hfg.mono ?_)
rintro p ⟨hp1, hp2⟩
simp only [(· ∘ ·), hp1, hp2, Prod.map]
/-- If `f (g y) = y` for `y` in some neighborhood of `a`, `g` is continuous at `a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `g a`, then `g` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem HasFDerivAt.of_local_left_inverse {f : E → F} {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {g : F → E} {a : F}
(hg : ContinuousAt g a) (hf : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (g a))
(hfg : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, f (g y) = y) : HasFDerivAt g (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a := by
simp only [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, ← nhdsWithin_univ] at hf hfg ⊢
exact hf.of_local_left_inverse (.inf hg (by simp)) (mem_univ _) hfg
/-- If `f` is a partial homeomorphism defined on a neighbourhood of `f.symm a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` in the sense of strict differentiability at `f.symm a`, then `f.symm` has
the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem PartialHomeomorph.hasStrictFDerivAt_symm (f : PartialHomeomorph E F) {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F}
{a : F} (ha : a ∈ f.target) (htff' : HasStrictFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f.symm a)) :
HasStrictFDerivAt f.symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
htff'.of_local_left_inverse (f.symm.continuousAt ha) (f.eventually_right_inverse ha)
/-- If `f` is a partial homeomorphism defined on a neighbourhood of `f.symm a`, and `f` has an
invertible derivative `f'` at `f.symm a`, then `f.symm` has the derivative `f'⁻¹` at `a`.
This is one of the easy parts of the inverse function theorem: it assumes that we already have
an inverse function. -/
theorem PartialHomeomorph.hasFDerivAt_symm (f : PartialHomeomorph E F) {f' : E ≃L[𝕜] F} {a : F}
(ha : a ∈ f.target) (htff' : HasFDerivAt f (f' : E →L[𝕜] F) (f.symm a)) :
HasFDerivAt f.symm (f'.symm : F →L[𝕜] E) a :=
htff'.of_local_left_inverse (f.symm.continuousAt ha) (f.eventually_right_inverse ha)
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.eventually_ne (h : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x)
(hf' : ∃ C, ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ C * ‖f' z‖) : ∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[s \ {x}] x, f z ≠ c := by
rcases eq_or_ne (f x) c with rfl | hc
· rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, eventually_inf_principal]
have A : (fun z => z - x) =O[𝓝[s] x] fun z => f' (z - x) :=
isBigO_iff.2 <| hf'.imp fun C hC => Eventually.of_forall fun z => hC _
have : (fun z => f z - f x) ~[𝓝[s] x] fun z => f' (z - x) := h.isLittleO.trans_isBigO A
simpa [not_imp_not, sub_eq_zero] using (A.trans this.isBigO_symm).eq_zero_imp
· exact (h.continuousWithinAt.eventually_ne hc).filter_mono <| by gcongr; apply diff_subset
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 418 | 433 | theorem HasFDerivAt.eventually_ne (h : HasFDerivAt f f' x) (hf' : ∃ C, ∀ z, ‖z‖ ≤ C * ‖f' z‖) :
∀ᶠ z in 𝓝[≠] x, f z ≠ c := by | simpa only [compl_eq_univ_diff] using (hasFDerivWithinAt_univ.2 h).eventually_ne hf'
end
section
/-
In the special case of a normed space over the reals,
we can use scalar multiplication in the `tendsto` characterization
of the Fréchet derivative.
-/
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[ℝ] F} {x : E} |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Basic
/-!
# The “almost everywhere” filter of co-null sets.
If `μ` is an outer measure or a measure on `α`,
then `MeasureTheory.ae μ` is the filter of co-null sets: `s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ sᶜ = 0`.
In this file we define the filter and prove some basic theorems about it.
## Notation
- `∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x`: the predicate `p` holds for `μ`-a.e. all `x`;
- `∃ᶠ x ∂μ, p x`: the predicate `p` holds on a set of nonzero measure;
- `f =ᵐ[μ] g`: `f x = g x` for `μ`-a.e. all `x`;
- `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g`: `f x ≤ g x` for `μ`-a.e. all `x`.
## Implementation details
All notation introduced in this file
reducibly unfolds to the corresponding definitions about filters,
so generic lemmas about `Filter.Eventually`, `Filter.EventuallyEq` etc apply.
However, we restate some lemmas specifically for `ae`.
## Tags
outer measure, measure, almost everywhere
-/
open Filter Set
open scoped ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α β F : Type*} [FunLike F (Set α) ℝ≥0∞] [OuterMeasureClass F α] {μ : F} {s t : Set α}
/-- The “almost everywhere” filter of co-null sets. -/
def ae (μ : F) : Filter α :=
.ofCountableUnion (μ · = 0) (fun _S hSc ↦ (measure_sUnion_null_iff hSc).2) fun _t ht _s hs ↦
measure_mono_null hs ht
/-- `∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a` means that `p a` for a.e. `a`, i.e. `p` holds true away from a null set.
This is notation for `Filter.Eventually p (MeasureTheory.ae μ)`. -/
notation3 "∀ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped p => Filter.Eventually p <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
/-- `∃ᵐ a ∂μ, p a` means that `p` holds `∂μ`-frequently,
i.e. `p` holds on a set of positive measure.
This is notation for `Filter.Frequently p (MeasureTheory.ae μ)`. -/
notation3 "∃ᵐ "(...)" ∂"μ", "r:(scoped P => Filter.Frequently P <| MeasureTheory.ae μ) => r
/-- `f =ᵐ[μ] g` means `f` and `g` are eventually equal along the a.e. filter,
i.e. `f=g` away from a null set.
This is notation for `Filter.EventuallyEq (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g`. -/
notation:50 f " =ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyEq (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
/-- `f ≤ᵐ[μ] g` means `f` is eventually less than `g` along the a.e. filter,
i.e. `f ≤ g` away from a null set.
This is notation for `Filter.EventuallyLE (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g`. -/
notation:50 f " ≤ᵐ[" μ:50 "] " g:50 => Filter.EventuallyLE (MeasureTheory.ae μ) f g
theorem mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : s ∈ ae μ ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | ¬p a } = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_ae_iff {s : Set α} : sᶜ ∈ ae μ ↔ μ s = 0 := by simp only [mem_ae_iff, compl_compl]
theorem frequently_ae_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, p a) ↔ μ { a | p a } ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
theorem frequently_ae_mem_iff {s : Set α} : (∃ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∈ s) ↔ μ s ≠ 0 :=
not_congr compl_mem_ae_iff
theorem measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem {s : Set α} : μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, a ∉ s :=
compl_mem_ae_iff.symm
theorem ae_of_all {p : α → Prop} (μ : F) : (∀ a, p a) → ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a :=
Eventually.of_forall
instance instCountableInterFilter : CountableInterFilter (ae μ) := by
unfold ae; infer_instance
theorem ae_all_iff {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {p : α → ι → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i :=
eventually_countable_forall
theorem all_ae_of {ι : Sort*} {p : α → ι → Prop} (hp : ∀ᵐ a ∂μ, ∀ i, p a i) (i : ι) :
∀ᵐ a ∂μ, p a i := by
filter_upwards [hp] with a ha using ha i
lemma ae_iff_of_countable [Countable α] {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) ↔ ∀ x, μ {x} ≠ 0 → p x := by
rw [ae_iff, measure_null_iff_singleton]
exacts [forall_congr' fun _ ↦ not_imp_comm, Set.to_countable _]
theorem ae_ball_iff {ι : Type*} {S : Set ι} (hS : S.Countable) {p : α → ∀ i ∈ S, Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), p x i hi) ↔ ∀ i (hi : i ∈ S), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x i hi :=
eventually_countable_ball hS
lemma ae_eq_refl (f : α → β) : f =ᵐ[μ] f := EventuallyEq.rfl
lemma ae_eq_rfl {f : α → β} : f =ᵐ[μ] f := EventuallyEq.rfl
lemma ae_eq_comm {f g : α → β} : f =ᵐ[μ] g ↔ g =ᵐ[μ] f := eventuallyEq_comm
theorem ae_eq_symm {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : g =ᵐ[μ] f :=
h.symm
theorem ae_eq_trans {f g h : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᵐ[μ] g) (h₂ : g =ᵐ[μ] h) : f =ᵐ[μ] h :=
h₁.trans h₂
@[simp] lemma ae_eq_top : ae μ = ⊤ ↔ ∀ a, μ {a} ≠ 0 := by
simp only [Filter.ext_iff, mem_ae_iff, mem_top, ne_eq]
refine ⟨fun h a ha ↦ by simpa [ha] using (h {a}ᶜ).1, fun h s ↦ ⟨fun hs ↦ ?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rw [← compl_empty_iff, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩
exact h _ <| measure_mono_null (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) hs
· rintro rfl
simp
theorem ae_le_of_ae_lt {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f x < g x) :
f ≤ᵐ[μ] g :=
h.mono fun _ ↦ le_of_lt
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_empty : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α) ↔ μ s = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_empty.trans <| by simp only [ae_iff, Classical.not_not, setOf_mem_eq]
-- The priority should be higher than `eventuallyEq_univ`.
@[simp high]
theorem ae_eq_univ : s =ᵐ[μ] (univ : Set α) ↔ μ sᶜ = 0 :=
eventuallyEq_univ
theorem ae_le_set : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 :=
calc
s ≤ᵐ[μ] t ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := Iff.rfl
_ ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 := by simp [ae_iff]; rfl
theorem ae_le_set_inter {s' t' : Set α} (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' ≤ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᵐ[μ] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'
theorem ae_le_set_union {s' t' : Set α} (h : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' ≤ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᵐ[μ] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.union h'
theorem union_ae_eq_right : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, union_diff_right,
diff_eq_empty.2 Set.subset_union_right]
theorem diff_ae_eq_self : (s \ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ μ (s ∩ t) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set, diff_diff_right, diff_diff,
diff_eq_empty.2 Set.subset_union_right]
theorem diff_null_ae_eq_self (ht : μ t = 0) : (s \ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s :=
diff_ae_eq_self.mpr (measure_mono_null inter_subset_right ht)
theorem ae_eq_set {s t : Set α} : s =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ μ (s \ t) = 0 ∧ μ (t \ s) = 0 := by
simp [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, ae_le_set]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff {s t : Set α} : μ (s ∆ t) = 0 ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp [ae_eq_set, symmDiff_def]
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_set_compl_compl {s t : Set α} : sᶜ =ᵐ[μ] tᶜ ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
simp only [← measure_symmDiff_eq_zero_iff, compl_symmDiff_compl]
theorem ae_eq_set_compl {s t : Set α} : sᶜ =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s =ᵐ[μ] tᶜ := by
rw [← ae_eq_set_compl_compl, compl_compl]
theorem ae_eq_set_inter {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'
theorem ae_eq_set_union {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.union h'
theorem ae_eq_set_diff {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
s \ s' =ᵐ[μ] t \ t' :=
h.diff h'
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem ae_eq_set_symmDiff {s' t' : Set α} (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) (h' : s' =ᵐ[μ] t') :
s ∆ s' =ᵐ[μ] t ∆ t' :=
h.symmDiff h'
theorem union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_left (h : s =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] univ :=
(ae_eq_set_union h (ae_eq_refl t)).trans <| by rw [univ_union]
theorem union_ae_eq_univ_of_ae_eq_univ_right (h : t =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] univ := by
convert ae_eq_set_union (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [union_univ]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_empty (h : s =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α)) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t := by
convert ae_eq_set_union h (ae_eq_refl t)
rw [empty_union]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_empty (h : t =ᵐ[μ] (∅ : Set α)) : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s := by
convert ae_eq_set_union (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [union_empty]
theorem inter_ae_eq_right_of_ae_eq_univ (h : s =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∩ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t := by
convert ae_eq_set_inter h (ae_eq_refl t)
rw [univ_inter]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE.lean | 216 | 218 | theorem inter_ae_eq_left_of_ae_eq_univ (h : t =ᵐ[μ] univ) : (s ∩ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s := by | convert ae_eq_set_inter (ae_eq_refl s) h
rw [inter_univ] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 347 | 349 | theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by | rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 137 | 138 | theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by | simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.InitTail
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `TruncatedWittVector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `TruncatedWittVector.instCommRing`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `WittVector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `TruncatedWittVector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `WittVector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open Function (Injective Surjective)
noncomputable section
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
/-- A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`TruncatedWittVector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `TruncatedWittVector p n R`.
(`TruncatedWittVector p₁ n R` and `TruncatedWittVector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def TruncatedWittVector (_ : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) :=
Fin n → R
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
variable {n R}
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable (p) in
/-- Create a `TruncatedWittVector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : Fin n → R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
x
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : R :=
x i
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (x : Fin n → R) (i : Fin n) : (mk p x).coeff i = x i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeff (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : (mk p fun i => x.coeff i) = x := by
ext i; rw [coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun i => if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) (i : Fin n) : x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [out]; dsimp only; rw [dif_pos i.is_lt, Fin.eta]
theorem out_injective : Injective (@out p n R _) := by
intro x y h
ext i
rw [WittVector.ext_iff] at h
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
variable (n)
section
/-- `truncateFun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `TruncatedWittVector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `WittVector.truncate` -/
def truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
TruncatedWittVector.mk p fun i => x.coeff i
end
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncateFun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [truncateFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem out_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : (truncateFun n x).out = init n x := by
ext i
dsimp [TruncatedWittVector.out, init, select, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi; swap; · rfl
rw [coeff_truncateFun, Fin.val_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : x.out.truncateFun n = x := by
simp only [WittVector.truncateFun, coeff_out, mk_coeff]
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [Fact p.Prime]
instance : Zero (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 0⟩
instance : One (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨truncateFun n 1⟩
instance : NatCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : IntCast (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun i => truncateFun n i⟩
instance : Add (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out + y.out)⟩
instance : Mul (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out * y.out)⟩
instance : Neg (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x => truncateFun n (-x.out)⟩
instance : Sub (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun x y => truncateFun n (x.out - y.out)⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun m x => truncateFun n (m • x.out)⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (TruncatedWittVector p n R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x m => truncateFun n (x.out ^ m)⟩
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (i : Fin n) : (0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R).coeff i = 0 := by
show coeff i (truncateFun _ 0 : TruncatedWittVector p n R) = 0
rw [coeff_truncateFun, WittVector.zero_coeff]
end TruncatedWittVector
/-- A macro tactic used to prove that `truncateFun` respects ring operations. -/
macro (name := witt_truncateFun_tac) "witt_truncateFun_tac" : tactic =>
`(tactic|
{ show _ = WittVector.truncateFun n _
apply TruncatedWittVector.out_injective
iterate rw [WittVector.out_truncateFun]
first
| rw [WittVector.init_add]
| rw [WittVector.init_mul]
| rw [WittVector.init_neg]
| rw [WittVector.init_sub]
| rw [WittVector.init_nsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_zsmul]
| rw [WittVector.init_pow]})
namespace WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
theorem truncateFun_surjective : Surjective (@truncateFun p n R) :=
Function.RightInverse.surjective TruncatedWittVector.truncateFun_out
variable [Fact p.Prime]
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_zero : truncateFun n (0 : 𝕎 R) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_one : truncateFun n (1 : 𝕎 R) = 1 := rfl
variable {p R}
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_add (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x + y) = truncateFun n x + truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
@[simp]
theorem truncateFun_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x * y) = truncateFun n x * truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_neg (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (-x) = -truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_sub (x y : 𝕎 R) :
truncateFun n (x - y) = truncateFun n x - truncateFun n y := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_nsmul (m : ℕ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_zsmul (m : ℤ) (x : 𝕎 R) : truncateFun n (m • x) = m • truncateFun n x := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_pow (x : 𝕎 R) (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (x ^ m) = truncateFun n x ^ m := by
witt_truncateFun_tac
theorem truncateFun_natCast (m : ℕ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
theorem truncateFun_intCast (m : ℤ) : truncateFun n (m : 𝕎 R) = m := rfl
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
open WittVector
variable (p n R)
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
instance instCommRing : CommRing (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
(truncateFun_surjective p n R).commRing _ (truncateFun_zero p n R) (truncateFun_one p n R)
(truncateFun_add n) (truncateFun_mul n) (truncateFun_neg n) (truncateFun_sub n)
(truncateFun_nsmul n) (truncateFun_zsmul n) (truncateFun_pow n) (truncateFun_natCast n)
(truncateFun_intCast n)
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
open TruncatedWittVector
variable (n)
variable [CommRing R]
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- `truncate n` is a ring homomorphism that truncates `x` to its first `n` entries
to obtain a `TruncatedWittVector`, which has the same base `p` as `x`. -/
noncomputable def truncate : 𝕎 R →+* TruncatedWittVector p n R where
toFun := truncateFun n
map_zero' := truncateFun_zero p n R
map_add' := truncateFun_add n
map_one' := truncateFun_one p n R
map_mul' := truncateFun_mul n
variable (p R)
theorem truncate_surjective : Surjective (truncate n : 𝕎 R → TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
truncateFun_surjective p n R
variable {p n R}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncate n x).coeff i = x.coeff i :=
coeff_truncateFun _ _
variable (n)
theorem mem_ker_truncate (x : 𝕎 R) :
x ∈ RingHom.ker (truncate (p := p) n) ↔ ∀ i < n, x.coeff i = 0 := by
simp only [RingHom.mem_ker, truncate, truncateFun, RingHom.coe_mk, TruncatedWittVector.ext_iff,
TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk, coeff_zero]
exact Fin.forall_iff
variable (p)
@[simp]
theorem truncate_mk' (f : ℕ → R) :
truncate n (@mk' p _ f) = TruncatedWittVector.mk _ fun k => f k := by
ext i
simp only [coeff_truncate, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
section
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- A ring homomorphism that truncates a truncated Witt vector of length `m` to
a truncated Witt vector of length `n`, for `n ≤ m`.
-/
def truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) : TruncatedWittVector p m R →+* TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse (WittVector.truncate m) out truncateFun_out
⟨WittVector.truncate n, by
intro x
simp only [WittVector.mem_ker_truncate]
intro h i hi
exact h i (lt_of_lt_of_le hi hm)⟩
@[simp]
theorem truncate_comp_wittVector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) :
(truncate (p := p) (R := R) hm).comp (WittVector.truncate m) = WittVector.truncate n :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem truncate_wittVector_truncate {m : ℕ} (hm : n ≤ m) (x : 𝕎 R) :
truncate hm (WittVector.truncate m x) = WittVector.truncate n x :=
RingHom.liftOfRightInverse_comp_apply _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem truncate_truncate {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃)
(x : TruncatedWittVector p n₃ R) :
(truncate h1) (truncate h2 x) = truncate (h1.trans h2) x := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := WittVector.truncate_surjective (p := p) n₃ R x
simp only [truncate_wittVector_truncate]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Truncated.lean | 356 | 359 | theorem truncate_comp {n₁ n₂ n₃ : ℕ} (h1 : n₁ ≤ n₂) (h2 : n₂ ≤ n₃) :
(truncate (p := p) (R := R) h1).comp (truncate h2) = truncate (h1.trans h2) := by | ext1 x; simp only [truncate_truncate, Function.comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Bryan Gin-ge Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Adam Topaz, Bryan Gin-ge Chen, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.BooleanAlgebra
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Basic
/-!
# Symmetric difference and bi-implication
This file defines the symmetric difference and bi-implication operators in (co-)Heyting algebras.
## Examples
Some examples are
* The symmetric difference of two sets is the set of elements that are in either but not both.
* The symmetric difference on propositions is `Xor'`.
* The symmetric difference on `Bool` is `Bool.xor`.
* The equivalence of propositions. Two propositions are equivalent if they imply each other.
* The symmetric difference translates to addition when considering a Boolean algebra as a Boolean
ring.
## Main declarations
* `symmDiff`: The symmetric difference operator, defined as `(a \ b) ⊔ (b \ a)`
* `bihimp`: The bi-implication operator, defined as `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`
In generalized Boolean algebras, the symmetric difference operator is:
* `symmDiff_comm`: commutative, and
* `symmDiff_assoc`: associative.
## Notations
* `a ∆ b`: `symmDiff a b`
* `a ⇔ b`: `bihimp a b`
## References
The proof of associativity follows the note "Associativity of the Symmetric Difference of Sets: A
Proof from the Book" by John McCuan:
* <https://people.math.gatech.edu/~mccuan/courses/4317/symmetricdifference.pdf>
## Tags
boolean ring, generalized boolean algebra, boolean algebra, symmetric difference, bi-implication,
Heyting
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*} {π : ι → Type*}
/-- The symmetric difference operator on a type with `⊔` and `\` is `(A \ B) ⊔ (B \ A)`. -/
def symmDiff [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : α :=
a \ b ⊔ b \ a
/-- The Heyting bi-implication is `(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)`. This generalizes equivalence of
propositions. -/
def bihimp [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : α :=
(b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b)
/-- Notation for symmDiff -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ∆ " => symmDiff
/-- Notation for bihimp -/
scoped[symmDiff] infixl:100 " ⇔ " => bihimp
open scoped symmDiff
theorem symmDiff_def [Max α] [SDiff α] (a b : α) : a ∆ b = a \ b ⊔ b \ a :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_def [Min α] [HImp α] (a b : α) : a ⇔ b = (b ⇨ a) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_eq_Xor' (p q : Prop) : p ∆ q = Xor' p q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_iff_iff {p q : Prop} : p ⇔ q ↔ (p ↔ q) :=
iff_iff_implies_and_implies.symm.trans Iff.comm
@[simp]
theorem Bool.symmDiff_eq_xor : ∀ p q : Bool, p ∆ q = xor p q := by decide
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_symmDiff : toDual (a ∆ b) = toDual a ⇔ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_bihimp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇔ b) = ofDual a ∆ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b = b ∆ a := by simp only [symmDiff, sup_comm]
instance symmDiff_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_self : a ∆ a = ⊥ := by rw [symmDiff, sup_idem, sdiff_self]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_bot : a ∆ ⊥ = a := by rw [symmDiff, sdiff_bot, bot_sdiff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_symmDiff : ⊥ ∆ a = a := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_bot]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_eq_bot {a b : α} : a ∆ b = ⊥ ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_eq_bot_iff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff, le_antisymm_iff]
theorem symmDiff_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ∆ b = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, bot_sup_eq]
theorem symmDiff_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ∆ b = a \ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 h, sup_bot_eq]
theorem symmDiff_le {a b c : α} (ha : a ≤ b ⊔ c) (hb : b ≤ a ⊔ c) : a ∆ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (sdiff_le_iff.2 ha) <| sdiff_le_iff.2 hb
theorem symmDiff_le_iff {a b c : α} : a ∆ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c ∧ b ≤ a ⊔ c := by
simp_rw [symmDiff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_le_sup {a b : α} : a ∆ b ≤ a ⊔ b :=
sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b = (a ⊔ b) \ (a ⊓ b) := by simp [sup_sdiff, symmDiff]
theorem Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup {a b : α} (h : Disjoint a b) : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, h.sdiff_eq_left, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff : a ∆ b \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) := by
rw [symmDiff, sup_sdiff_distrib, sdiff_sdiff_left, sdiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_inf : a ∆ b \ (a ⊓ b) = a ∆ b := by
rw [symmDiff_sdiff]
simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup : a ∆ (b \ a) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff, sdiff_idem]
exact
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup sdiff_le sdiff_le)
(sup_le le_sdiff_sup <| le_sdiff_sup.trans <| sup_le le_sup_right le_sdiff_sup)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup : (a \ b) ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup, sup_comm]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sup_inf : a ∆ b ⊔ a ⊓ b = a ⊔ b := by
refine le_antisymm (sup_le symmDiff_le_sup inf_le_sup) ?_
rw [sup_inf_left, symmDiff]
refine sup_le (le_inf le_sup_right ?_) (le_inf ?_ le_sup_right)
· rw [sup_right_comm]
exact le_sup_of_le_left le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sup_assoc]
exact le_sup_of_le_right le_sdiff_sup
@[simp]
theorem inf_sup_symmDiff : a ⊓ b ⊔ a ∆ b = a ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_inf : a ∆ b ∆ (a ⊓ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [← symmDiff_sdiff_inf a, sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup, symmDiff_sup_inf]
@[simp]
theorem inf_symmDiff_symmDiff : (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ∆ b) = a ⊔ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_symmDiff_inf]
theorem symmDiff_triangle : a ∆ c ≤ a ∆ b ⊔ b ∆ c := by
refine (sup_le_sup (sdiff_triangle a b c) <| sdiff_triangle _ b _).trans_eq ?_
rw [sup_comm (c \ b), sup_sup_sup_comm, symmDiff, symmDiff]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_right (a b : α) : a ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ b := by
convert symmDiff_triangle a b ⊥ <;> rw [symmDiff_bot]
theorem le_symmDiff_sup_left (a b : α) : b ≤ (a ∆ b) ⊔ a :=
symmDiff_comm a b ▸ le_symmDiff_sup_right ..
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b c : α)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_bihimp : toDual (a ⇔ b) = toDual a ∆ toDual b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_symmDiff (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ∆ b) = ofDual a ⇔ ofDual b :=
rfl
theorem bihimp_comm : a ⇔ b = b ⇔ a := by simp only [(· ⇔ ·), inf_comm]
instance bihimp_isCommutative : Std.Commutative (α := α) (· ⇔ ·) :=
⟨bihimp_comm⟩
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_self : a ⇔ a = ⊤ := by rw [bihimp, inf_idem, himp_self]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_top : a ⇔ ⊤ = a := by rw [bihimp, himp_top, top_himp, inf_top_eq]
@[simp]
theorem top_bihimp : ⊤ ⇔ a = a := by rw [bihimp_comm, bihimp_top]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_eq_top {a b : α} : a ⇔ b = ⊤ ↔ a = b :=
@symmDiff_eq_bot αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_of_le {a b : α} (h : a ≤ b) : a ⇔ b = b ⇨ a := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, inf_top_eq]
theorem bihimp_of_ge {a b : α} (h : b ≤ a) : a ⇔ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [bihimp, himp_eq_top_iff.2 h, top_inf_eq]
theorem le_bihimp {a b c : α} (hb : a ⊓ b ≤ c) (hc : a ⊓ c ≤ b) : a ≤ b ⇔ c :=
le_inf (le_himp_iff.2 hc) <| le_himp_iff.2 hb
theorem le_bihimp_iff {a b c : α} : a ≤ b ⇔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c ∧ a ⊓ c ≤ b := by
simp_rw [bihimp, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem inf_le_bihimp {a b : α} : a ⊓ b ≤ a ⇔ b :=
inf_le_inf le_himp le_himp
theorem bihimp_eq_inf_himp_inf : a ⇔ b = a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⊓ b := by simp [himp_inf_distrib, bihimp]
theorem Codisjoint.bihimp_eq_inf {a b : α} (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [bihimp, h.himp_eq_left, h.himp_eq_right]
theorem himp_bihimp : a ⇨ b ⇔ c = (a ⊓ c ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⊓ b ⇨ c) := by
rw [bihimp, himp_inf_distrib, himp_himp, himp_himp]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_bihimp : a ⊔ b ⇨ a ⇔ b = a ⇔ b := by
rw [himp_bihimp]
simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_himp_eq_inf : a ⇔ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sdiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem himp_bihimp_eq_inf : (b ⇨ a) ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@sdiff_symmDiff_eq_sup αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_inf_sup : a ⇔ b ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_sup_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_inf_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⊓ a ⇔ b = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_sup_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bihimp_sup : a ⇔ b ⇔ (a ⊔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@symmDiff_symmDiff_inf αᵒᵈ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_bihimp_bihimp : (a ⊔ b) ⇔ (a ⇔ b) = a ⊓ b :=
@inf_symmDiff_symmDiff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
theorem bihimp_triangle : a ⇔ b ⊓ b ⇔ c ≤ a ⇔ c :=
@symmDiff_triangle αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_top' : a ∆ ⊤ = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem top_symmDiff' : ⊤ ∆ a = ￢a := by simp [symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_symmDiff_self : (￢a) ∆ a = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, symmDiff, hnot_sdiff, sup_sdiff_self]
exact Codisjoint.top_le codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_hnot_self : a ∆ (￢a) = ⊤ := by rw [symmDiff_comm, hnot_symmDiff_self]
theorem IsCompl.symmDiff_eq_top {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ∆ b = ⊤ := by
rw [h.eq_hnot, hnot_symmDiff_self]
end CoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α)
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_bot : a ⇔ ⊥ = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem bot_bihimp : ⊥ ⇔ a = aᶜ := by simp [bihimp]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bihimp_self : aᶜ ⇔ a = ⊥ :=
@hnot_symmDiff_self αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp]
theorem bihimp_hnot_self : a ⇔ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
@symmDiff_hnot_self αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsCompl.bihimp_eq_bot {a b : α} (h : IsCompl a b) : a ⇔ b = ⊥ := by
rw [h.eq_compl, compl_bihimp_self]
end HeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedBooleanAlgebra α] (a b c d : α)
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_symmDiff : (a ⊔ b) \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b :=
sdiff_eq_symm inf_le_sup (by rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf])
theorem disjoint_symmDiff_inf : Disjoint (a ∆ b) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_left : a ⊓ b ∆ c = (a ⊓ b) ∆ (a ⊓ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, inf_sdiff_distrib_left, inf_sup_left, inf_inf_distrib_left,
symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf]
theorem inf_symmDiff_distrib_right : a ∆ b ⊓ c = (a ⊓ c) ∆ (b ⊓ c) := by
simp_rw [inf_comm _ c, inf_symmDiff_distrib_left]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ a ⊓ c \ b := by
simp only [(· ∆ ·), sdiff_sdiff_sup_sdiff']
theorem sdiff_symmDiff' : c \ a ∆ b = c ⊓ a ⊓ b ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [sdiff_symmDiff, sdiff_sup]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_left : a ∆ b \ a = b \ a := by
rw [symmDiff_def, sup_sdiff, sdiff_idem, sdiff_sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem symmDiff_sdiff_right : a ∆ b \ b = a \ b := by rw [symmDiff_comm, symmDiff_sdiff_left]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_left : a \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by simp [sdiff_symmDiff]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_symmDiff_right : b \ a ∆ b = a ⊓ b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, inf_comm, sdiff_symmDiff_left]
theorem symmDiff_eq_sup : a ∆ b = a ⊔ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, Disjoint.symmDiff_eq_sup⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf, sdiff_eq_self_iff_disjoint] at h
exact h.of_disjoint_inf_of_le le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_left : a ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symmDiff_eq_sup.symm ▸ le_sup_left⟩
rw [symmDiff_eq_sup_sdiff_inf] at h
exact disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr (le_sdiff_right.1 <| inf_le_of_left_le h).le
@[simp]
theorem le_symmDiff_iff_right : b ≤ a ∆ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [symmDiff_comm, le_symmDiff_iff_left, disjoint_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_left :
a ∆ b ∆ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ b \ c ⊔ c \ a ∆ b := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ (c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ c ⊓ a ⊓ b) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (c ⊓ a ⊓ b), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_right :
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c :=
calc
a ∆ (b ∆ c) = a \ b ∆ c ⊔ b ∆ c \ a := symmDiff_def _ _
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c ⊔ (b \ (c ⊔ a) ⊔ c \ (b ⊔ a)) := by
{ rw [sdiff_symmDiff', sup_comm (a ⊓ b ⊓ c), symmDiff_sdiff] }
_ = a \ (b ⊔ c) ⊔ b \ (a ⊔ c) ⊔ c \ (a ⊔ b) ⊔ a ⊓ b ⊓ c := by ac_rfl
theorem symmDiff_assoc : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ (b ∆ c) := by
rw [symmDiff_symmDiff_left, symmDiff_symmDiff_right]
instance symmDiff_isAssociative : Std.Associative (α := α) (· ∆ ·) :=
⟨symmDiff_assoc⟩
theorem symmDiff_left_comm : a ∆ (b ∆ c) = b ∆ (a ∆ c) := by
simp_rw [← symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_right_comm : a ∆ b ∆ c = a ∆ c ∆ b := by simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_comm]
theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_symmDiff_comm : a ∆ b ∆ (c ∆ d) = a ∆ c ∆ (b ∆ d) := by
simp_rw [symmDiff_assoc, symmDiff_left_comm]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Order/SymmDiff.lean | 413 | 414 | theorem symmDiff_symmDiff_cancel_left : a ∆ (a ∆ b) = b := by | simp [← symmDiff_assoc] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sub_pi_div_two _
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : cos (↑(π / 2) - θ) = sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_pi_div_two_sub _
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [sin_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|sin θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_sin_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· rw [cos_add_pi, abs_neg]
theorem abs_cos_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) :
|cos θ| = |cos ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIcoMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIcoMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIcoDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIcoMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_toIocMod (θ ψ : ℝ) : ↑(toIocMod two_pi_pos ψ θ) = (θ : Angle) := by
rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
refine ⟨-toIocDiv two_pi_pos ψ θ, ?_⟩
rw [toIocMod_sub_self, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm]
/-- Convert a `Real.Angle` to a real number in the interval `Ioc (-π) π`. -/
def toReal (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
(toIocMod_periodic two_pi_pos (-π)).lift θ
theorem toReal_coe (θ : ℝ) : (θ : Angle).toReal = toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ :=
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ -π < θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
rw [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_self two_pi_pos]
ring_nf
rfl
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_iff_mem_Ioc {θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle).toReal = θ ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, ← Set.mem_Ioc]
theorem toReal_injective : Function.Injective toReal := by
intro θ ψ h
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
simpa [toReal_coe, toIocMod_eq_toIocMod, zsmul_eq_mul, mul_comm _ (2 * π), ←
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, eq_comm] using h
@[simp]
theorem toReal_inj {θ ψ : Angle} : θ.toReal = ψ.toReal ↔ θ = ψ :=
toReal_injective.eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_toReal (θ : Angle) : (θ.toReal : Angle) = θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact coe_toIocMod _ _
theorem neg_pi_lt_toReal (θ : Angle) : -π < θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact left_lt_toIocMod _ _ _
theorem toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ≤ π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
convert toIocMod_le_right two_pi_pos _ _
ring
theorem abs_toReal_le_pi (θ : Angle) : |θ.toReal| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_toReal _).le, toReal_le_pi _⟩
theorem toReal_mem_Ioc (θ : Angle) : θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
⟨neg_pi_lt_toReal _, toReal_le_pi _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_toReal (θ : Angle) : toIocMod two_pi_pos (-π) θ.toReal = θ.toReal := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [toReal_coe]
exact toIocMod_toIocMod _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem toReal_zero : (0 : Angle).toReal = 0 := by
rw [← coe_zero, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = 0 ↔ θ = 0 := by
nth_rw 1 [← toReal_zero]
exact toReal_inj
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi : (π : Angle).toReal = π := by
rw [toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨Left.neg_lt_self Real.pi_pos, le_refl _⟩
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π ↔ θ = π := by rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi]
theorem pi_ne_zero : (π : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi, toReal_zero]
exact Real.pi_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem toReal_pi_div_two : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_pi_div_two]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_neg_pi_div_two : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle).toReal = -π / 2 :=
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
@[simp]
theorem toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal = -π / 2 ↔ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← toReal_inj, toReal_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero Real.pi_ne_zero two_ne_zero
theorem neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : ((-π / 2 : ℝ) : Angle) ≠ 0 := by
rw [← toReal_injective.ne_iff, toReal_neg_pi_div_two, toReal_zero]
exact div_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 Real.pi_ne_zero) two_ne_zero
theorem abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h =>
(toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2 ⟨(Left.neg_neg_iff.2 Real.pi_pos).trans_le h.1, h.2⟩).symm ▸
abs_eq_self.2 h.1⟩
theorem abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff {θ : ℝ} : |(-θ : Angle).toReal| = θ ↔ 0 ≤ θ ∧ θ ≤ π := by
refine ⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨abs_nonneg _, abs_toReal_le_pi _⟩, fun h => ?_⟩
by_cases hnegpi : θ = π; · simp [hnegpi, Real.pi_pos.le]
rw [← coe_neg,
toReal_coe_eq_self_iff.2
⟨neg_lt_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne h.2 hnegpi), (neg_nonpos.2 h.1).trans Real.pi_pos.le⟩,
abs_neg, abs_eq_self.2 h.1]
theorem abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff {θ : Angle} :
|θ.toReal| = π / 2 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [abs_eq (div_nonneg Real.pi_pos.le two_pos.le), ← neg_div, toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff,
toReal_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
theorem nsmul_toReal_eq_mul {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) {θ : Angle} :
(n • θ).toReal = n * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / n) (π / n) := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
have h' : 0 < (n : ℝ) := mod_cast Nat.pos_of_ne_zero h
rw [← coe_nsmul, nsmul_eq_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc, div_lt_iff₀' h',
le_div_iff₀' h']
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) :=
mod_cast nsmul_toReal_eq_mul two_ne_zero
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal ↔ θ.toReal ∈ Set.Ioc (-π / 2) (π / 2) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul]
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} {k : ℤ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * k * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc ((2 * k - 1 : ℝ) * π) ((2 * k + 1) * π) := by
rw [← sub_zero (θ : Angle), ← zsmul_zero k, ← coe_two_pi, ← coe_zsmul, ← coe_sub, zsmul_eq_mul, ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm (k : ℝ), toReal_coe_eq_self_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩, fun h => ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩⟩
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ - 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc π (3 * π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ 1 <;> norm_num
theorem toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff {θ : ℝ} :
(θ : Angle).toReal = θ + 2 * π ↔ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-3 * π) (-π) := by
convert @toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_mul_int_mul_pi_iff θ (-1) using 2 <;> norm_num
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_sub_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
exact
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨(div_lt_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h, by linarith [pi_pos, toReal_le_pi θ]⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal - 2 * π ↔ π / 2 < θ.toReal := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_sub_two_pi]
theorem two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℕ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, toReal_coe_eq_self_add_two_pi_iff, Set.mem_Ioc]
refine
⟨fun h => by linarith, fun h =>
⟨by linarith [pi_pos, neg_pi_lt_toReal θ], (le_div_iff₀' (zero_lt_two' ℝ)).1 h⟩⟩
theorem two_zsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi {θ : Angle} :
((2 : ℤ) • θ).toReal = 2 * θ.toReal + 2 * π ↔ θ.toReal ≤ -π / 2 := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_toReal_eq_two_mul_add_two_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sin_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.sin θ.toReal = sin θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, sin_coe]
@[simp]
theorem cos_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.cos θ.toReal = cos θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, cos_coe]
theorem cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| ≤ π / 2 := by
nth_rw 1 [← coe_toReal θ]
rw [abs_le, cos_coe]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc⟩
by_contra hn
rw [not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at hn
refine (not_lt.2 h) ?_
rcases hn with (hn | hn)
· rw [← Real.cos_neg]
refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt (by linarith) ?_
linarith [neg_pi_lt_toReal θ]
· refine cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt hn ?_
linarith [toReal_le_pi θ]
theorem cos_pos_iff_abs_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {θ : Angle} : 0 < cos θ ↔ |θ.toReal| < π / 2 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, lt_iff_le_and_ne, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two, ←
and_congr_right]
rintro -
rw [Ne, Ne, not_iff_not, @eq_comm ℝ 0, abs_toReal_eq_pi_div_two_iff, cos_eq_zero_iff]
theorem cos_neg_iff_pi_div_two_lt_abs_toReal {θ : Angle} : cos θ < 0 ↔ π / 2 < |θ.toReal| := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_le, not_iff_not, cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← two_nsmul_coe_div_two, ← nsmul_sub, two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : |cos θ| = |sin ψ| := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The tangent of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def tan (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin θ / cos θ
theorem tan_eq_sin_div_cos (θ : Angle) : tan θ = sin θ / cos θ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_coe (x : ℝ) : tan (x : Angle) = Real.tan x := by
rw [tan, sin_coe, cos_coe, Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_zero : tan (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, tan_coe, Real.tan_zero]
theorem tan_coe_pi : tan (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [tan_coe, Real.tan_pi]
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← coe_add, tan_coe, tan_coe]
exact Real.tan_periodic _
@[simp]
theorem tan_add_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ + π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : tan (θ - π) = tan θ :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem tan_toReal (θ : Angle) : Real.tan θ.toReal = tan θ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← coe_toReal θ, tan_coe]
theorem tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℕ) • θ = (2 : ℕ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
rw [two_nsmul_eq_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl)
· rfl
· exact tan_add_pi _
theorem tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : (2 : ℤ) • θ = (2 : ℤ) • ψ) : tan θ = tan ψ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_of_two_nsmul_eq h
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℕ) • θ + (2 : ℕ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
rw [← smul_add, ← coe_add, ← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, ← two_mul, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub] at h
rcases h with ⟨k, h⟩
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, ← mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π, mul_assoc, ← mul_add,
mul_right_inj' (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq', mul_inv_cancel_left₀ two_ne_zero π,
inv_mul_eq_div, mul_comm] at h
rw [tan_coe, tan_coe, ← tan_pi_div_two_sub, h, add_sub_assoc, add_comm]
exact Real.tan_periodic.int_mul _ _
theorem tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • θ + (2 : ℤ) • ψ = π) : tan ψ = (tan θ)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul] at h
exact tan_eq_inv_of_two_nsmul_add_two_nsmul_eq_pi h
/-- The sign of a `Real.Angle` is `0` if the angle is `0` or `π`, `1` if the angle is strictly
between `0` and `π` and `-1` is the angle is strictly between `-π` and `0`. It is defined as the
sign of the sine of the angle. -/
def sign (θ : Angle) : SignType :=
SignType.sign (sin θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : (0 : Angle).sign = 0 := by
rw [sign, sin_zero, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi : (π : Angle).sign = 0 := by rw [sign, sin_coe_pi, _root_.sign_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (θ : Angle) : (-θ).sign = -θ.sign := by
simp_rw [sign, sin_neg, Left.sign_neg]
theorem sign_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sign (π : Angle) := fun θ => by
rw [sign, sign, sin_add_pi, Left.sign_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_add_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ + π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_add (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) + θ).sign = -θ.sign := by rw [add_comm, sign_add_pi]
@[simp]
theorem sign_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : (θ - π).sign = -θ.sign :=
sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem sign_pi_sub (θ : Angle) : ((π : Angle) - θ).sign = θ.sign := by
simp [sign_antiperiodic.sub_eq']
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [sign, _root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sign_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : θ.sign ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sign_eq_zero_iff]
theorem toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg {θ : Angle} : θ.toReal < 0 ↔ θ.sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_eq_neg_one_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· exact ⟨fun _ => Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_toReal θ), fun _ => h⟩
· simp [h]
· exact
⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.asymm hn), fun hn =>
False.elim (hn.not_le (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)))⟩
theorem toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} : 0 ≤ θ.toReal ↔ 0 ≤ θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (h | h | h)
· refine ⟨fun hn => False.elim (h.not_le hn), fun hn => ?_⟩
rw [toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 h] at hn
exact False.elim (hn.not_lt (by decide))
· simp [h, sign, ← sin_toReal]
· refine ⟨fun _ => ?_, fun _ => h.le⟩
rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h.le (toReal_le_pi θ)
@[simp]
theorem sign_toReal {θ : Angle} (h : θ ≠ π) : SignType.sign θ.toReal = θ.sign := by
rcases lt_trichotomy θ.toReal 0 with (ht | ht | ht)
· simp [ht, toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.1 ht]
· simp [sign, ht, ← sin_toReal]
· rw [sign, ← sin_toReal, sign_pos ht,
sign_pos
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi ht ((toReal_le_pi θ).lt_of_ne (toReal_eq_pi_iff.not.2 h)))]
theorem coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonneg {θ : Angle} (h : 0 ≤ θ.sign) : ↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [abs_eq_self.2 (toReal_nonneg_iff_sign_nonneg.2 h), coe_toReal]
theorem neg_coe_abs_toReal_of_sign_nonpos {θ : Angle} (h : θ.sign ≤ 0) : -↑|θ.toReal| = θ := by
rw [SignType.nonpos_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h)
· rw [abs_of_neg (toReal_neg_iff_sign_neg.2 h), coe_neg, neg_neg, coe_toReal]
· rw [sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (rfl | rfl) <;> simp [abs_of_pos Real.pi_pos]
theorem eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq {θ ψ : Angle} :
θ = ψ ↔ θ.sign = ψ.sign ∧ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases h with ⟨hs, hr⟩
rw [abs_eq_abs] at hr
rcases hr with (hr | hr)
· exact toReal_injective hr
· by_cases h : θ = π
· rw [h, toReal_pi, ← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal ψ).ne hr)
· by_cases h' : ψ = π
· rw [h', toReal_pi] at hr
exact False.elim ((neg_pi_lt_toReal θ).ne hr.symm)
· rw [← sign_toReal h, ← sign_toReal h', hr, Left.sign_neg, SignType.neg_eq_self_iff,
_root_.sign_eq_zero_iff, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hs
rw [hs, toReal_zero, neg_zero, toReal_eq_zero_iff] at hr
rw [hr, hs]
theorem eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq {θ ψ : Angle} (h : θ.sign = ψ.sign) :
θ = ψ ↔ |θ.toReal| = |ψ.toReal| := by simpa [h] using @eq_iff_sign_eq_and_abs_toReal_eq θ ψ
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_pi_div_two : (↑(π / 2) : Angle).sign = 1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, sin_pi_div_two, sign_one]
@[simp]
theorem sign_coe_neg_pi_div_two : (↑(-π / 2) : Angle).sign = -1 := by
rw [sign, sin_coe, neg_div, Real.sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two, Left.sign_neg, sign_one]
theorem sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
0 ≤ (θ : Angle).sign := by
rw [sign, sign_nonneg_iff]
exact sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi h0 hpi
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 814 | 815 | theorem sign_neg_coe_nonpos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {θ : ℝ} (h0 : 0 ≤ θ) (hpi : θ ≤ π) :
(-θ : Angle).sign ≤ 0 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Satisfiability
/-!
# Type Spaces
This file defines the space of complete types over a first-order theory.
(Note that types in model theory are different from types in type theory.)
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType`:
`T.CompleteType α` consists of complete types over the theory `T` with variables `α`.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.typeOf` is the type of a given tuple.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.realizedTypes`: `T.realizedTypes M α` is the set of
types in `T.CompleteType α` that are realized in `M` - that is, the type of some tuple in `M`.
## Main Results
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.nonempty_iff`:
The space `T.CompleteType α` is nonempty exactly when `T` is satisfiable.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Theory.CompleteType.exists_modelType_is_realized_in`: Every type is realized
in some model.
## Implementation Notes
- Complete types are implemented as maximal consistent theories in an expanded language.
More frequently they are described as maximal consistent sets of formulas, but this is equivalent.
## TODO
- Connect `T.CompleteType α` to sets of formulas `L.Formula α`.
-/
universe u v w w'
open Cardinal Set FirstOrder
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
namespace Theory
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} (T : L.Theory) (α : Type w)
/-- A complete type over a given theory in a certain type of variables is a maximally
consistent (with the theory) set of formulas in that type. -/
structure CompleteType where
/-- The underlying theory -/
toTheory : L[[α]].Theory
subset' : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ toTheory
isMaximal' : toTheory.IsMaximal
variable {T α}
namespace CompleteType
attribute [coe] CompleteType.toTheory
instance Sentence.instSetLike : SetLike (T.CompleteType α) (L[[α]].Sentence) :=
⟨fun p => p.toTheory, fun p q h => by
cases p
cases q
congr ⟩
theorem isMaximal (p : T.CompleteType α) : IsMaximal (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.isMaximal'
theorem subset (p : T.CompleteType α) : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊆ (p : L[[α]].Theory) :=
p.subset'
theorem mem_or_not_mem (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ ∈ p ∨ φ.not ∈ p :=
p.isMaximal.mem_or_not_mem φ
theorem mem_of_models (p : T.CompleteType α) {φ : L[[α]].Sentence}
(h : (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊨ᵇ φ) : φ ∈ p :=
(p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_right fun con =>
((models_iff_not_satisfiable _).1 h)
(p.isMaximal.1.mono (union_subset p.subset (singleton_subset_iff.2 con)))
theorem not_mem_iff (p : T.CompleteType α) (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) : φ.not ∈ p ↔ ¬φ ∈ p :=
⟨fun hf ht => by
have h : ¬IsSatisfiable ({φ, φ.not} : L[[α]].Theory) := by
rintro ⟨@⟨_, _, h, _⟩⟩
simp only [model_iff, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff, forall_eq_or_imp, forall_eq] at h
exact h.2 h.1
refine h (p.isMaximal.1.mono ?_)
rw [insert_subset_iff, singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨ht, hf⟩, (p.mem_or_not_mem φ).resolve_left⟩
@[simp]
theorem compl_setOf_mem {φ : L[[α]].Sentence} :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | φ ∈ p }ᶜ = { p : T.CompleteType α | φ.not ∈ p } :=
ext fun _ => (not_mem_iff _ _).symm
theorem setOf_subset_eq_empty_iff (S : L[[α]].Theory) :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | S ⊆ ↑p } = ∅ ↔
¬((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ∪ S).IsSatisfiable := by
rw [iff_not_comm, ← not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty, Classical.not_not, Set.Nonempty]
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨⟨L[[α]].completeTheory h.some, (subset_union_left (t := S)).trans completeTheory.subset,
completeTheory.isMaximal (L[[α]]) h.some⟩,
(((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T).subset_union_right).trans completeTheory.subset⟩,
?_⟩
rintro ⟨p, hp⟩
exact p.isMaximal.1.mono (union_subset p.subset hp)
theorem setOf_mem_eq_univ_iff (φ : L[[α]].Sentence) :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | φ ∈ p } = Set.univ ↔ (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊨ᵇ φ := by
rw [models_iff_not_satisfiable, ← compl_empty_iff, compl_setOf_mem, ← setOf_subset_eq_empty_iff]
simp
theorem setOf_subset_eq_univ_iff (S : L[[α]].Theory) :
{ p : T.CompleteType α | S ⊆ ↑p } = Set.univ ↔
∀ φ, φ ∈ S → (L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T ⊨ᵇ φ := by
have h : { p : T.CompleteType α | S ⊆ ↑p } = ⋂₀ ((fun φ => { p | φ ∈ p }) '' S) := by
ext
simp [subset_def]
simp_rw [h, sInter_eq_univ, ← setOf_mem_eq_univ_iff]
refine ⟨fun h φ φS => h _ ⟨_, φS, rfl⟩, ?_⟩
rintro h _ ⟨φ, h1, rfl⟩
exact h _ h1
theorem nonempty_iff : Nonempty (T.CompleteType α) ↔ T.IsSatisfiable := by
rw [← isSatisfiable_onTheory_iff (lhomWithConstants_injective L α)]
rw [nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty, nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, not_iff_comm,
← union_empty ((L.lhomWithConstants α).onTheory T), ← setOf_subset_eq_empty_iff]
simp
instance instNonempty : Nonempty (CompleteType (∅ : L.Theory) α) :=
nonempty_iff.2 (isSatisfiable_empty L)
theorem iInter_setOf_subset {ι : Type*} (S : ι → L[[α]].Theory) :
⋂ i : ι, { p : T.CompleteType α | S i ⊆ p } =
{ p : T.CompleteType α | ⋃ i : ι, S i ⊆ p } := by
ext
simp only [mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq, iUnion_subset_iff]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Types.lean | 147 | 151 | theorem toList_foldr_inf_mem {p : T.CompleteType α} {t : Finset (L[[α]]).Sentence} :
t.toList.foldr (· ⊓ ·) ⊤ ∈ p ↔ (t : L[[α]].Theory) ⊆ ↑p := by | simp_rw [subset_def, ← SetLike.mem_coe, p.isMaximal.mem_iff_models, models_sentence_iff,
Sentence.Realize, Formula.Realize, BoundedFormula.realize_foldr_inf, Finset.mem_toList]
exact ⟨fun h φ hφ M => h _ _ hφ, fun h M φ hφ => h _ hφ _⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Angle
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# The argument of a complex number.
We define `arg : ℂ → ℝ`, returning a real number in the range (-π, π],
such that for `x ≠ 0`, `sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
while `arg 0` defaults to `0`
-/
open Filter Metric Set
open scoped ComplexConjugate Real Topology
namespace Complex
variable {a x z : ℂ}
/-- `arg` returns values in the range (-π, π], such that for `x ≠ 0`,
`sin (arg x) = x.im / x.abs` and `cos (arg x) = x.re / x.abs`,
`arg 0` defaults to `0` -/
noncomputable def arg (x : ℂ) : ℝ :=
if 0 ≤ x.re then Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖)
else if 0 ≤ x.im then Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π else Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π
theorem sin_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.sin (arg x) = x.im / ‖x‖ := by
unfold arg; split_ifs <;>
simp [sub_eq_add_neg, arg, Real.sin_arcsin (abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).1
(abs_le.1 (abs_im_div_norm_le_one x)).2, Real.sin_add, neg_div, Real.arcsin_neg, Real.sin_neg]
theorem cos_arg {x : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Real.cos (arg x) = x.re / ‖x‖ := by
rw [arg]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_sq, (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx).le, *]
· rw [Real.cos_add_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
· rw [Real.cos_sub_pi, Real.cos_arcsin]
field_simp [Real.sqrt_div (sq_nonneg _), Real.sqrt_sq_eq_abs,
_root_.abs_of_neg (not_le.1 h₁), *]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * exp (arg x * I) = x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· have : ‖x‖ ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx
apply Complex.ext <;> field_simp [sin_arg, cos_arg hx, this, mul_comm ‖x‖]
@[simp]
theorem norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (x : ℂ) : (‖x‖ * (cos (arg x) + sin (arg x) * I) : ℂ) = x := by
rw [← exp_mul_I, norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I]
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_cos_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.cos (arg x) = x.re := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg re (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
@[simp]
lemma norm_mul_sin_arg (x : ℂ) : ‖x‖ * Real.sin (arg x) = x.im := by
simpa [-norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I] using congr_arg im (norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x)
theorem norm_eq_one_iff (z : ℂ) : ‖z‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ : ℝ, exp (θ * I) = z := by
refine ⟨fun hz => ⟨arg z, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· calc
exp (arg z * I) = ‖z‖ * exp (arg z * I) := by rw [hz, ofReal_one, one_mul]
_ = z :=norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I z
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
exact Complex.norm_exp_ofReal_mul_I θ
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_exp_arg_mul_I := norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I := norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_cos_arg := norm_mul_cos_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_mul_sin_arg := norm_mul_sin_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff := norm_eq_one_iff
@[simp]
theorem range_exp_mul_I : (Set.range fun x : ℝ => exp (x * I)) = Metric.sphere 0 1 := by
ext x
simp only [mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq_one_iff, Set.mem_range]
theorem arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) :
arg (r * (cos θ + sin θ * I)) = θ := by
simp only [arg, norm_mul, norm_cos_add_sin_mul_I, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hr.le, mul_one]
simp only [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, neg_im, ← ofReal_cos, ← ofReal_sin, ←
mk_eq_add_mul_I, neg_div, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ hr.ne', mul_nonneg_iff_right_nonneg_of_pos hr]
by_cases h₁ : θ ∈ Set.Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)
· rw [if_pos]
exacts [Real.arcsin_sin' h₁, Real.cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc h₁]
· rw [Set.mem_Icc, not_and_or, not_le, not_le] at h₁
rcases h₁ with h₁ | h₁
· replace hθ := hθ.1
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := by
rw [← neg_pos, ← Real.cos_add_pi]
refine Real.cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
have hsin : Real.sin θ < 0 := Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt (by linarith) hθ
rw [if_neg, if_neg, ← Real.sin_add_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, add_sub_cancel_right] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin.not_le; exact hcos.not_le]
· replace hθ := hθ.2
have hcos : Real.cos θ < 0 := Real.cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt h₁ (by linarith)
have hsin : 0 ≤ Real.sin θ := Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, hθ⟩
rw [if_neg, if_pos, ← Real.sin_sub_pi, Real.arcsin_sin, sub_add_cancel] <;> [linarith;
linarith; exact hsin; exact hcos.not_le]
theorem arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I {θ : ℝ} (hθ : θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π) : arg (cos θ + sin θ * I) = θ := by
rw [← one_mul (_ + _), ← ofReal_one, arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I zero_lt_one hθ]
lemma arg_exp_mul_I (θ : ℝ) :
arg (exp (θ * I)) = toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ := by
convert arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I (θ := toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ) _ using 2
· rw [← exp_mul_I, eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
@[simp]
theorem arg_zero : arg 0 = 0 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
theorem ext_norm_arg {x y : ℂ} (h₁ : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (h₂ : x.arg = y.arg) : x = y := by
rw [← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I x, ← norm_mul_exp_arg_mul_I y, h₁, h₂]
theorem ext_norm_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ arg x = arg y :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩, and_imp.2 ext_norm_arg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg := ext_norm_arg
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias ext_abs_arg_iff := ext_norm_arg_iff
theorem arg_mem_Ioc (z : ℂ) : arg z ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π := by
have hπ : 0 < π := Real.pi_pos
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz)
· simp [hπ, hπ.le]
rcases existsUnique_add_zsmul_mem_Ioc Real.two_pi_pos (arg z) (-π) with ⟨N, hN, -⟩
rw [two_mul, neg_add_cancel_left, ← two_mul, zsmul_eq_mul] at hN
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, ← cos_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N, ← sin_add_int_mul_two_pi _ N]
have := arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz) hN
push_cast at this
rwa [this]
@[simp]
theorem range_arg : Set.range arg = Set.Ioc (-π) π :=
(Set.range_subset_iff.2 arg_mem_Ioc).antisymm fun _ hx => ⟨_, arg_cos_add_sin_mul_I hx⟩
theorem arg_le_pi (x : ℂ) : arg x ≤ π :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).2
theorem neg_pi_lt_arg (x : ℂ) : -π < arg x :=
(arg_mem_Ioc x).1
theorem abs_arg_le_pi (z : ℂ) : |arg z| ≤ π :=
abs_le.2 ⟨(neg_pi_lt_arg z).le, arg_le_pi z⟩
@[simp]
theorem arg_nonneg_iff {z : ℂ} : 0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ z.im := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | h₀); · simp
calc
0 ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ Real.sin (arg z) :=
⟨fun h => Real.sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h, arg_le_pi z⟩, by
contrapose!
intro h
exact Real.sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h (neg_pi_lt_arg _)⟩
_ ↔ _ := by rw [sin_arg, le_div_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h₀), zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < 0 ↔ z.im < 0 :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le arg_nonneg_iff
theorem arg_real_mul (x : ℂ) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : arg (r * x) = arg x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx); · rw [mul_zero]
conv_lhs =>
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I x, ← mul_assoc, ← ofReal_mul,
arg_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I (mul_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)) x.arg_mem_Ioc]
theorem arg_mul_real {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) (x : ℂ) : arg (x * r) = arg x :=
mul_comm x r ▸ arg_real_mul x hr
theorem arg_eq_arg_iff {x y : ℂ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
arg x = arg y ↔ (‖y‖ / ‖x‖ : ℂ) * x = y := by
simp only [ext_norm_arg_iff, norm_mul, norm_div, norm_real, norm_norm,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr hx), eq_self_iff_true, true_and]
rw [← ofReal_div, arg_real_mul]
exact div_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx)
@[simp] lemma arg_one : arg 1 = 0 := by simp [arg, zero_le_one]
/-- This holds true for all `x : ℂ` because of the junk values `0 / 0 = 0` and `arg 0 = 0`. -/
@[simp] lemma arg_div_self (x : ℂ) : arg (x / x) = 0 := by
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0 <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_one : arg (-1) = π := by simp [arg, le_refl, not_le.2 (zero_lt_one' ℝ)]
@[simp]
theorem arg_I : arg I = π / 2 := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem arg_neg_I : arg (-I) = -(π / 2) := by simp [arg, le_refl]
@[simp]
theorem tan_arg (x : ℂ) : Real.tan (arg x) = x.im / x.re := by
by_cases h : x = 0
· simp only [h, zero_div, Complex.zero_im, Complex.arg_zero, Real.tan_zero, Complex.zero_re]
rw [Real.tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_arg, cos_arg h,
div_div_div_cancel_right₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : arg x = 0 := by simp [arg, hx]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma natCast_arg {n : ℕ} : arg n = 0 :=
ofReal_natCast n ▸ arg_ofReal_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg
@[simp]
lemma ofNat_arg {n : ℕ} [n.AtLeastTwo] : arg ofNat(n) = 0 :=
natCast_arg
theorem arg_eq_zero_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∧ z.im = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [norm_nonneg]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h, rfl : y = 0⟩
exact arg_ofReal_of_nonneg h
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_zero_iff_zero_le {z : ℂ} : arg z = 0 ↔ 0 ≤ z := by
rw [arg_eq_zero_iff, eq_comm, nonneg_iff]
theorem arg_eq_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z.re < 0 ∧ z.im = 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0
· simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero.symm]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨h : x < 0, rfl : y = 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_one, ← arg_real_mul (-1) (neg_pos.2 h)]
simp [← ofReal_def]
open ComplexOrder in
lemma arg_eq_pi_iff_lt_zero {z : ℂ} : arg z = π ↔ z < 0 := arg_eq_pi_iff
theorem arg_lt_pi_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π ↔ 0 ≤ z.re ∨ z.im ≠ 0 := by
rw [(arg_le_pi z).lt_iff_ne, not_iff_comm, not_or, not_le, Classical.not_not, arg_eq_pi_iff]
theorem arg_ofReal_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) : arg x = π :=
arg_eq_pi_iff.2 ⟨hx, rfl⟩
theorem arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = π / 2 ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ 0 < z.im := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_div_two_pos.ne]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : 0 < y⟩
rw [← arg_I, ← arg_real_mul I hy, ofReal_mul', I_re, I_im, mul_zero, mul_one]
theorem arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z = -(π / 2) ↔ z.re = 0 ∧ z.im < 0 := by
by_cases h₀ : z = 0; · simp [h₀, lt_irrefl, Real.pi_ne_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← norm_mul_cos_add_sin_mul_I z, h]
simp [h₀]
· obtain ⟨x, y⟩ := z
rintro ⟨rfl : x = 0, hy : y < 0⟩
rw [← arg_neg_I, ← arg_real_mul (-I) (neg_pos.2 hy), mk_eq_add_mul_I]
simp
theorem arg_of_re_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx : 0 ≤ x.re) : arg x = Real.arcsin (x.im / ‖x‖) :=
if_pos hx
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : 0 ≤ x.im) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) + π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im, if_true, if_false]
theorem arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hx_re : x.re < 0) (hx_im : x.im < 0) :
arg x = Real.arcsin ((-x).im / ‖x‖) - π := by
simp only [arg, hx_re.not_le, hx_im.not_le, if_false]
theorem arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (h₁ : 0 ≤ z.im) (h₂ : z ≠ 0) :
arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
rw [← cos_arg h₂, Real.arccos_cos (arg_nonneg_iff.2 h₁) (arg_le_pi _)]
theorem arg_of_im_pos {z : ℂ} (hz : 0 < z.im) : arg z = Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) :=
arg_of_im_nonneg_of_ne_zero hz.le fun h => hz.ne' <| h.symm ▸ rfl
theorem arg_of_im_neg {z : ℂ} (hz : z.im < 0) : arg z = -Real.arccos (z.re / ‖z‖) := by
have h₀ : z ≠ 0 := mt (congr_arg im) hz.ne
rw [← cos_arg h₀, ← Real.cos_neg, Real.arccos_cos, neg_neg]
exacts [neg_nonneg.2 (arg_neg_iff.2 hz).le, neg_le.2 (neg_pi_lt_arg z).le]
theorem arg_conj (x : ℂ) : arg (conj x) = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
simp_rw [arg_eq_pi_iff, arg, neg_im, conj_im, conj_re, norm_conj, neg_div, neg_neg,
Real.arcsin_neg]
rcases lt_trichotomy x.re 0 with (hr | hr | hr) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy x.im 0 with (hi | hi | hi)
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.le, hi.ne, not_le.2 hi, add_comm]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi]
· simp [hr, hr.not_le, hi.ne.symm, hi.le, not_le.2 hi, sub_eq_neg_add]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hi.ne]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
· simp [hr, hr.le, hr.le.not_lt]
theorem arg_inv (x : ℂ) : arg x⁻¹ = if arg x = π then π else -arg x := by
rw [← arg_conj, inv_def, mul_comm]
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· exact arg_real_mul (conj x) (by simp [hx])
@[simp] lemma abs_arg_inv (x : ℂ) : |x⁻¹.arg| = |x.arg| := by rw [arg_inv]; split_ifs <;> simp [*]
-- TODO: Replace the next two lemmas by general facts about periodic functions
lemma norm_eq_one_iff' : ‖x‖ = 1 ↔ ∃ θ ∈ Set.Ioc (-π) π, exp (θ * I) = x := by
rw [norm_eq_one_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨toIocMod (mul_pos two_pos Real.pi_pos) (-π) θ, ?_, ?_⟩
· convert toIocMod_mem_Ioc _ _ _
ring
· rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq <| toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul _ _ θ, ofReal_sub,
ofReal_zsmul, ofReal_mul, ofReal_ofNat, exp_mul_I_periodic.sub_zsmul_eq]
· rintro ⟨θ, _, rfl⟩
exact ⟨θ, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-16")] alias abs_eq_one_iff' := norm_eq_one_iff'
lemma image_exp_Ioc_eq_sphere : (fun θ : ℝ ↦ exp (θ * I)) '' Set.Ioc (-π) π = sphere 0 1 := by
ext; simpa using norm_eq_one_iff'.symm
theorem arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ im z < 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him.not_lt]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add, half_sub,
Real.neg_pi_div_two_lt_arcsin, neg_im, neg_div, neg_lt_neg_iff, div_lt_one, ←
abs_of_nonneg him, abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him]
exact (sub_le_self _ Real.pi_pos.le).trans (Real.arcsin_le_pi_div_two _)
theorem neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) ≤ arg z ↔ 0 ≤ re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 (re z) with hre | hre
· simp only [hre, arg_of_re_nonneg hre, Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin, true_or]
simp only [hre.not_le, false_or]
rcases le_or_lt 0 (im z) with him | him
· simp only [him]
rw [iff_true, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_nonneg hre him]
exact (Real.neg_pi_div_two_le_arcsin _).trans (le_add_of_nonneg_right Real.pi_pos.le)
· simp only [him.not_le]
rw [iff_false, not_le, arg_of_re_neg_of_im_neg hre him, sub_lt_iff_lt_add', ←
sub_eq_add_neg, sub_half, Real.arcsin_lt_pi_div_two, div_lt_one, neg_im, ← abs_of_neg him,
abs_im_lt_norm]
exacts [hre.ne, norm_pos_iff.mpr <| ne_of_apply_ne re hre.ne]
lemma neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff {z : ℂ} : -(π / 2) < arg z ↔ 0 < re z ∨ 0 ≤ im z := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ne_comm, Ne, arg_eq_neg_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt]
· simp [hre]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
lemma arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : arg z < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ im z < 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, Ne, arg_eq_pi_div_two_iff]
rcases lt_trichotomy z.re 0 with hre | hre | hre
· have : z ≠ 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre.ne]
simp [hre.ne, hre.not_le, hre.not_lt, this]
· have : z = 0 ↔ z.im = 0 := by simp [Complex.ext_iff, hre]
simp [hre, this, or_comm, le_iff_eq_or_lt]
· simp [hre, hre.le, hre.ne']
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_le_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| ≤ π / 2 ↔ 0 ≤ re z := by
rw [abs_le, arg_le_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_le_arg_iff, ← or_and_left, ← not_le,
and_not_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem abs_arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff {z : ℂ} : |arg z| < π / 2 ↔ 0 < re z ∨ z = 0 := by
rw [abs_lt, arg_lt_pi_div_two_iff, neg_pi_div_two_lt_arg_iff, ← or_and_left]
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with hz | hz
· simp [hz]
· simp_rw [hz, or_false, ← not_lt, not_and_self_iff, or_false]
@[simp]
theorem arg_conj_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg (conj x) : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_conj, h]
@[simp]
theorem arg_inv_coe_angle (x : ℂ) : (arg x⁻¹ : Real.Angle) = -arg x := by
by_cases h : arg x = π <;> simp [arg_inv, h]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_of_im_pos {x : ℂ} (hi : 0 < x.im) : arg (-x) = arg x - π := by
rw [arg_of_im_pos hi, arg_of_im_neg (show (-x).im < 0 from Left.neg_neg_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg]
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Complex/Arg.lean | 404 | 409 | theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_add_pi_of_im_neg {x : ℂ} (hi : x.im < 0) : arg (-x) = arg x + π := by | rw [arg_of_im_neg hi, arg_of_im_pos (show 0 < (-x).im from Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hi)]
simp [neg_div, Real.arccos_neg, add_comm, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem arg_neg_eq_arg_sub_pi_iff {x : ℂ} :
arg (-x) = arg x - π ↔ 0 < x.im ∨ x.im = 0 ∧ x.re < 0 := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by
refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_
obtain ⟨a, ha, ha', x, hx, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s x) (half_pos hε))
obtain ⟨b, hb, hb', y, hy, rfl⟩ :=
exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs (lt_add_of_pos_right (gauge s y) (half_pos hε))
calc
gauge s (a • x + b • y) ≤ a + b := gauge_le_of_mem (by positivity) <| by
rw [hs.add_smul ha.le hb.le]
exact add_mem_add (smul_mem_smul_set hx) (smul_mem_smul_set hy)
_ < gauge s (a • x) + gauge s (b • y) + ε := by linarith
theorem self_subset_gauge_le_one : s ⊆ { x | gauge s x ≤ 1 } := fun _ => gauge_le_one_of_mem
theorem Convex.gauge_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
Convex ℝ { x | gauge s x ≤ a } := by
by_cases ha : 0 ≤ a
· rw [gauge_le_eq hs h₀ absorbs ha]
exact convex_iInter fun i => convex_iInter fun _ => hs.smul _
· convert convex_empty (𝕜 := ℝ)
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => ha <| (gauge_nonneg _).trans hx
theorem Balanced.starConvex (hs : Balanced ℝ s) : StarConvex ℝ 0 s :=
starConvex_zero_iff.2 fun _ hx a ha₀ ha₁ =>
hs _ (by rwa [Real.norm_of_nonneg ha₀]) (smul_mem_smul_set hx)
theorem le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₀ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ a • s) :
a ≤ gauge s x := by
rw [starConvex_zero_iff] at hs₀
obtain ⟨r, hr, h⟩ := hs₂.exists_pos
refine le_csInf ⟨r, hr, singleton_subset_iff.1 <| h _ (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr.le).ge⟩ ?_
rintro b ⟨hb, x, hx', rfl⟩
refine not_lt.1 fun hba => hx ?_
have ha := hb.trans hba
refine ⟨(a⁻¹ * b) • x, hs₀ hx' (by positivity) ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← div_eq_inv_mul]
exact div_le_one_of_le₀ hba.le ha.le
· dsimp only
rw [← mul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_left₀ ha.ne']
theorem one_le_gauge_of_not_mem (hs₁ : StarConvex ℝ 0 s) (hs₂ : Absorbs ℝ s {x}) (hx : x ∉ s) :
1 ≤ gauge s x :=
le_gauge_of_not_mem hs₁ hs₂ <| by rwa [one_smul]
section LinearOrderedField
variable {α : Type*} [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
[MulActionWithZero α ℝ] [OrderedSMul α ℝ]
theorem gauge_smul_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [IsScalarTower α ℝ (Set E)] {s : Set E} {a : α}
(ha : 0 ≤ a) (x : E) : gauge s (a • x) = a • gauge s x := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [zero_smul, gauge_zero, zero_smul]
rw [gauge_def', gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg ha]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, hx⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr
refine ⟨a⁻¹ • r, ⟨this, ?_⟩, smul_inv_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc,
mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ (inv_ne_zero ha'.ne'), inv_inv]
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne'] at hx
have := smul_pos ha' hr
refine ⟨this, ?_⟩
rw [← mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ this.ne', smul_assoc]
exact smul_mem_smul_set hx
theorem gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg [MulActionWithZero α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} {a : α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
gauge (a • s) = a⁻¹ • gauge s := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [inv_zero, zero_smul, gauge_of_subset_zero (zero_smul_set_subset _)]
ext x
rw [gauge_def', Pi.smul_apply, gauge_def', ← Real.sInf_smul_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.2 ha)]
congr 1
ext r
simp_rw [Set.mem_smul_set, Set.mem_sep_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hr, y, hy, h⟩
simp_rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨a • r, ⟨smul_pos ha' hr, ?_⟩, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne' _⟩
rwa [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, ← h, inv_smul_smul₀ ha'.ne']
· rintro ⟨r, ⟨hr, hx⟩, rfl⟩
rw [mem_Ioi] at hr ⊢
refine ⟨smul_pos (inv_pos.2 ha') hr, r⁻¹ • x, hx, ?_⟩
rw [smul_inv₀, smul_assoc, inv_inv]
theorem gauge_smul_left [Module α E] [SMulCommClass α ℝ ℝ] [IsScalarTower α ℝ ℝ]
[IsScalarTower α ℝ E] {s : Set E} (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (a : α) :
gauge (a • s) = |a|⁻¹ • gauge s := by
rw [← gauge_smul_left_of_nonneg (abs_nonneg a)]
obtain h | h := abs_choice a
· rw [h]
· rw [h, Set.neg_smul_set, ← Set.smul_set_neg]
-- Porting note: was congr
apply congr_arg
apply congr_arg
ext y
refine ⟨symmetric _, fun hy => ?_⟩
rw [← neg_neg y]
exact symmetric _ hy
end LinearOrderedField
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜] [Module 𝕜 E] [IsScalarTower ℝ 𝕜 E]
theorem gauge_norm_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) :
gauge s (‖r‖ • x) = gauge s (r • x) := by
unfold gauge
congr with θ
rw [@RCLike.real_smul_eq_coe_smul 𝕜]
refine and_congr_right fun hθ => (hs.smul _).smul_mem_iff ?_
rw [RCLike.norm_ofReal, abs_norm]
/-- If `s` is balanced, then the Minkowski functional is ℂ-homogeneous. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 303 | 316 | theorem gauge_smul (hs : Balanced 𝕜 s) (r : 𝕜) (x : E) : gauge s (r • x) = ‖r‖ * gauge s x := by | rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← gauge_smul_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg r), gauge_norm_smul hs]
end RCLike
open Filter
section TopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
theorem comap_gauge_nhds_zero_le (ha : Absorbent ℝ s) (hb : Bornology.IsVonNBounded ℝ s) :
comap (gauge s) (𝓝 0) ≤ 𝓝 0 := fun u hu ↦ by
rcases (hb hu).exists_pos with ⟨r, hr₀, hr⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Quotients
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Finite
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Germ.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Ultrafilter.Defs
/-!
# Ultraproducts and Łoś's Theorem
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.Structure` is the ultraproduct structure on `Filter.Product`.
## Main Results
- Łoś's Theorem: `FirstOrder.Language.Ultraproduct.sentence_realize`. An ultraproduct models a
sentence `φ` if and only if the set of structures in the product that model `φ` is in the
ultrafilter.
## Tags
ultraproduct, Los's theorem
-/
universe u v
variable {α : Type*} (M : α → Type*) (u : Ultrafilter α)
open FirstOrder Filter
open Filter
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure
variable {L : Language.{u, v}} [∀ a, L.Structure (M a)]
namespace Ultraproduct
instance setoidPrestructure : L.Prestructure ((u : Filter α).productSetoid M) :=
{ (u : Filter α).productSetoid M with
toStructure :=
{ funMap := fun {_} f x a => funMap f fun i => x i a
RelMap := fun {_} r x => ∀ᶠ a : α in u, RelMap r fun i => x i a }
fun_equiv := fun {n} f x y xy => by
refine mem_of_superset (iInter_mem.2 xy) fun a ha => ?_
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at ha
simp only [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ha]
rel_equiv := fun {n} r x y xy => by
rw [← iff_eq_eq]
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hy => ?_⟩
· refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hx (iInter_mem.2 xy)) ?_
rintro a ⟨ha1, ha2⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at *
rw [← funext ha2]
exact ha1
· refine mem_of_superset (inter_mem hy (iInter_mem.2 xy)) ?_
rintro a ⟨ha1, ha2⟩
simp only [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq] at *
rw [funext ha2]
exact ha1 }
variable {M} {u}
instance «structure» : L.Structure ((u : Filter α).Product M) :=
Language.quotientStructure
theorem funMap_cast {n : ℕ} (f : L.Functions n) (x : Fin n → ∀ a, M a) :
(funMap f fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) =
(fun a => funMap f fun i => x i a : (u : Filter α).Product M) := by
apply funMap_quotient_mk'
theorem term_realize_cast {β : Type*} (x : β → ∀ a, M a) (t : L.Term β) :
(t.realize fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) =
(fun a => t.realize fun i => x i a : (u : Filter α).Product M) := by
convert @Term.realize_quotient_mk' L _ ((u : Filter α).productSetoid M)
(Ultraproduct.setoidPrestructure M u) _ t x using 2
ext a
induction t with
| var => rfl
| func _ _ t_ih => simp only [Term.realize, t_ih]; rfl
variable [∀ a : α, Nonempty (M a)]
theorem boundedFormula_realize_cast {β : Type*} {n : ℕ} (φ : L.BoundedFormula β n)
(x : β → ∀ a, M a) (v : Fin n → ∀ a, M a) :
(φ.Realize (fun i : β => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M))
(fun i => (v i : (u : Filter α).Product M))) ↔
∀ᶠ a : α in u, φ.Realize (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a := by
letI := (u : Filter α).productSetoid M
induction φ with
| falsum => simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, eventually_const]
| equal =>
have h2 : ∀ a : α, (Sum.elim (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a) = fun i => Sum.elim x v i a :=
fun a => funext fun i => Sum.casesOn i (fun i => rfl) fun i => rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, h2, term_realize_cast]
erw [(Sum.comp_elim ((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) x v).symm,
term_realize_cast, term_realize_cast]
exact Quotient.eq''
| rel =>
have h2 : ∀ a : α, (Sum.elim (fun i : β => x i a) fun i => v i a) = fun i => Sum.elim x v i a :=
fun a => funext fun i => Sum.casesOn i (fun i => rfl) fun i => rfl
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, h2]
erw [(Sum.comp_elim ((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) x v).symm]
conv_lhs => enter [2, i]; erw [term_realize_cast]
apply relMap_quotient_mk'
| imp _ _ ih ih' =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize, ih v, ih' v]
rw [Ultrafilter.eventually_imp]
| @all k φ ih =>
simp only [BoundedFormula.Realize]
apply Iff.trans (b := ∀ m : ∀ a : α, M a,
φ.Realize (fun i : β => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M))
(Fin.snoc (((↑) : (∀ a, M a) → (u : Filter α).Product M) ∘ v)
(m : (u : Filter α).Product M)))
· exact Quotient.forall
have h' :
∀ (m : ∀ a, M a) (a : α),
(fun i : Fin (k + 1) => (Fin.snoc v m : _ → ∀ a, M a) i a) =
Fin.snoc (fun i : Fin k => v i a) (m a) := by
refine fun m a => funext (Fin.reverseInduction ?_ fun i _ => ?_)
· simp only [Fin.snoc_last]
· simp only [Fin.snoc_castSucc]
simp only [← Fin.comp_snoc]
simp only [Function.comp_def, ih, h']
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h m => ?_⟩
· contrapose! h
simp_rw [← Ultrafilter.eventually_not, not_forall] at h
refine
⟨fun a : α =>
Classical.epsilon fun m : M a =>
¬φ.Realize (fun i => x i a) (Fin.snoc (fun i => v i a) m),
?_⟩
rw [← Ultrafilter.eventually_not]
exact Filter.mem_of_superset h fun a ha => Classical.epsilon_spec ha
· rw [Filter.eventually_iff] at *
exact Filter.mem_of_superset h fun a ha => ha (m a)
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Ultraproducts.lean | 146 | 150 | theorem realize_formula_cast {β : Type*} (φ : L.Formula β) (x : β → ∀ a, M a) :
(φ.Realize fun i => (x i : (u : Filter α).Product M)) ↔
∀ᶠ a : α in u, φ.Realize fun i => x i a := by | simp_rw [Formula.Realize, ← boundedFormula_realize_cast φ x, iff_eq_eq]
exact congr rfl (Subsingleton.elim _ _) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Integral average of a function
In this file we define `MeasureTheory.average μ f` (notation: `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`) to be the average
value of `f` with respect to measure `μ`. It is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ)`, so it
is equal to zero if `f` is not integrable or if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability
measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, we use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ` (notation for `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`). For
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`.
Both have a version for the Lebesgue integral rather than Bochner.
We prove several version of the first moment method: An integrable function is below/above its
average on a set of positive measure:
* `measure_le_setLAverage_pos` for the Lebesgue integral
* `measure_le_setAverage_pos` for the Bochner integral
## Implementation notes
The average is defined as an integral over `(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ` so that all theorems about Bochner
integrals work for the average without modifications. For theorems that require integrability of a
function, we provide a convenience lemma `MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average`.
## Tags
integral, center mass, average value
-/
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
/-!
### Average value of a function w.r.t. a measure
The (Bochner, Lebesgue) average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` (notation:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ`, `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`) is defined as the (Bochner, Lebesgue) integral divided by the total
measure, so it is equal to zero if `μ` is an infinite measure, and (typically) equal to infinity if
`f` is not integrable. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if the space has infinite
measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If `s`
has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If
`s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem setLAverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq := setLAverage_eq
theorem setLAverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq' := setLAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
theorem setLAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr := setLAverage_congr
theorem setLAverage_congr_fun (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = g x) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in s, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr_fun hs h]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_congr_fun := setLAverage_congr_fun
theorem laverage_lt_top (hf : ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ < ∞ := by
obtain rfl | hμ := eq_or_ne μ 0
· simp
· rw [laverage_eq]
exact div_lt_top hf (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ)
theorem setLAverage_lt_top : ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ ≠ ∞ → ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ < ∞ :=
laverage_lt_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_lt_top := setLAverage_lt_top
theorem laverage_add_measure :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ + ν) =
μ univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ + ν univ / (μ univ + ν univ) * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂ν := by
by_cases hμ : IsFiniteMeasure μ; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hμ
simp [laverage_eq, hμ]
by_cases hν : IsFiniteMeasure ν; swap
· rw [not_isFiniteMeasure_iff] at hν
simp [laverage_eq, hν]
haveI := hμ; haveI := hν
simp only [← ENNReal.mul_div_right_comm, measure_mul_laverage, ← ENNReal.add_div,
← lintegral_add_measure, ← Measure.add_apply, ← laverage_eq]
theorem measure_mul_setLAverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (h : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ s * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ := by
have := Fact.mk h.lt_top
rw [← measure_mul_laverage, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias measure_mul_setLaverage := measure_mul_setLAverage
theorem laverage_union (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ =
μ s / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ + μ t / (μ s + μ t) * ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
rw [restrict_union₀ hd ht, laverage_add_measure, restrict_apply_univ, restrict_apply_univ]
theorem laverage_union_mem_openSegment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (ht₀ : μ t ≠ 0) (hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ) := by
refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), ENNReal.div_pos hs₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩,
ENNReal.div_pos ht₀ <| add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_union_mem_segment (hd : AEDisjoint μ s t) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(hsμ : μ s ≠ ∞) (htμ : μ t ≠ ∞) :
⨍⁻ x in s ∪ t, f x ∂μ ∈ [⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ -[ℝ≥0∞] ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ] := by
by_cases hs₀ : μ s = 0
· rw [← ae_eq_empty] at hs₀
rw [restrict_congr_set (hs₀.union EventuallyEq.rfl), empty_union]
exact right_mem_segment _ _ _
· refine
⟨μ s / (μ s + μ t), μ t / (μ s + μ t), zero_le _, zero_le _, ?_, (laverage_union hd ht).symm⟩
rw [← ENNReal.add_div,
ENNReal.div_self (add_eq_zero.not.2 fun h => hs₀ h.1) (add_ne_top.2 ⟨hsμ, htμ⟩)]
theorem laverage_mem_openSegment_compl_self [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hsc₀ : μ sᶜ ≠ 0) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ ∈ openSegment ℝ≥0∞ (⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) (⨍⁻ x in sᶜ, f x ∂μ) := by
simpa only [union_compl_self, restrict_univ] using
laverage_union_mem_openSegment aedisjoint_compl_right hs.compl hs₀ hsc₀ (measure_ne_top _ _)
(measure_ne_top _ _)
@[simp]
theorem laverage_const (μ : Measure α) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] [h : NeZero μ] (c : ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ _x, c ∂μ = c := by
simp only [laverage, lintegral_const, measure_univ, mul_one]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 218 | 223 | theorem setLAverage_const (hs₀ : μ s ≠ 0) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ _x in s, c ∂μ = c := by | simp only [setLAverage_eq, lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ,
univ_inter, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hs₀ hs, mul_one]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_const := setLAverage_const |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 119 | 121 | theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by | rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [associator_naturality]
simp [tensor_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whisker_assoc (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_exchange {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Z = f ▷ Y ≫ X ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem tensorHom_def' {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = X₁ ◁ g ≫ f ▷ Y₂ :=
whisker_exchange f g ▸ tensorHom_def f g
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.hom ≫ X ◁ f.inv = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.hom ▷ Z ≫ f.inv ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) :
X ◁ f.inv ≫ X ◁ f.hom = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) :
f.inv ▷ Z ≫ f.hom ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_hom_inv' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ f ≫ X ◁ inv f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.hom_inv_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem hom_inv_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
f ▷ Z ≫ inv f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.hom_inv_id, id_whiskerRight]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem whiskerLeft_inv_hom' (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
X ◁ inv f ≫ X ◁ f = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← whiskerLeft_comp, IsIso.inv_hom_id, whiskerLeft_id]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_hom_whiskerRight' {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] (Z : C) :
inv f ▷ Z ≫ f ▷ Z = 𝟙 (Y ⊗ Z) := by
rw [← comp_whiskerRight, IsIso.inv_hom_id, id_whiskerRight]
/-- The left whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def whiskerLeftIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ≅ Z) : X ⊗ Y ≅ X ⊗ Z where
hom := X ◁ f.hom
inv := X ◁ f.inv
instance whiskerLeft_isIso (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] : IsIso (X ◁ f) :=
(whiskerLeftIso X (asIso f)).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] :
inv (X ◁ f) = X ◁ inv f := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_refl (W X : C) :
whiskerLeftIso W (Iso.refl X) = Iso.refl (W ⊗ X) :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_id W X)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_trans (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) :
whiskerLeftIso W (f ≪≫ g) = whiskerLeftIso W f ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso W g :=
Iso.ext (whiskerLeft_comp W f.hom g.hom)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerLeftIso_symm (W : C) {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) :
(whiskerLeftIso W f).symm = whiskerLeftIso W f.symm := rfl
/-- The right whiskering of an isomorphism is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps!]
def whiskerRightIso {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (Z : C) : X ⊗ Z ≅ Y ⊗ Z where
hom := f.hom ▷ Z
inv := f.inv ▷ Z
instance whiskerRight_isIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] : IsIso (f ▷ Z) :=
(whiskerRightIso (asIso f) Z).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) [IsIso f] :
inv (f ▷ Z) = inv f ▷ Z := by
aesop_cat
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_refl (X W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (Iso.refl X) W = Iso.refl (X ⊗ W) :=
Iso.ext (id_whiskerRight X W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_trans {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : Y ≅ Z) (W : C) :
whiskerRightIso (f ≪≫ g) W = whiskerRightIso f W ≪≫ whiskerRightIso g W :=
Iso.ext (comp_whiskerRight f.hom g.hom W)
@[simp]
lemma whiskerRightIso_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (W : C) :
(whiskerRightIso f W).symm = whiskerRightIso f.symm W := rfl
/-- The tensor product of two isomorphisms is an isomorphism. -/
@[simps]
def tensorIso {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y)
(g : X' ≅ Y') : X ⊗ X' ≅ Y ⊗ Y' where
hom := f.hom ⊗ g.hom
inv := f.inv ⊗ g.inv
hom_inv_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.hom_inv_id, Iso.hom_inv_id, ← tensor_id]
inv_hom_id := by rw [← tensor_comp, Iso.inv_hom_id, Iso.inv_hom_id, ← tensor_id]
/-- Notation for `tensorIso`, the tensor product of isomorphisms -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => tensorIso
theorem tensorIso_def {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerRightIso f X' ≪≫ whiskerLeftIso Y g :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def f.hom g.hom)
theorem tensorIso_def' {X Y X' Y' : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g : X' ≅ Y') :
f ⊗ g = whiskerLeftIso X g ≪≫ whiskerRightIso f Y' :=
Iso.ext (tensorHom_def' f.hom g.hom)
instance tensor_isIso {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] : IsIso (f ⊗ g) :=
(asIso f ⊗ asIso g).isIso_hom
@[simp]
theorem inv_tensor {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) [IsIso f] (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] :
inv (f ⊗ g) = inv f ⊗ inv g := by
simp [tensorHom_def ,whisker_exchange]
variable {W X Y Z : C}
theorem whiskerLeft_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
(X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : P → (Y ⟶ Z)) (f' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) :
X ◁ (if h : P then f h else f' h) = if h : P then X ◁ f h else X ◁ f' h := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_whiskerRight {P : Prop} [Decidable P]
{X Y : C} (f : P → (X ⟶ Y)) (f' : ¬P → (X ⟶ Y)) (Z : C) :
(if h : P then f h else f' h) ▷ Z = if h : P then f h ▷ Z else f' h ▷ Z := by
split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem tensor_dite {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (f ⊗ if h : P then g h else g' h) =
if h : P then f ⊗ g h else f ⊗ g' h := by split_ifs <;> rfl
theorem dite_tensor {P : Prop} [Decidable P] {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : P → (Y ⟶ Z))
(g' : ¬P → (Y ⟶ Z)) : (if h : P then g h else g' h) ⊗ f =
if h : P then g h ⊗ f else g' h ⊗ f := by split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_eqToHom (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y = Z) :
X ◁ eqToHom f = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj rfl f) := by
cases f
simp only [whiskerLeft_id, eqToHom_refl]
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_whiskerRight {X Y : C} (f : X = Y) (Z : C) :
eqToHom f ▷ Z = eqToHom (congr_arg₂ tensorObj f rfl) := by
cases f
simp only [id_whiskerRight, eqToHom_refl]
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_left {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ f ▷ Y ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_tensor_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') (Y Z : C) :
f ▷ Y ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ f ▷ (Y ⊗ Z) ≫ (α_ X' Y Z).inv := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
(X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ f ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_middle (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whisker_assoc_symm (X : C) {Y Y' : C} (f : Y ⟶ Y') (Z : C) :
X ◁ f ▷ Z = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ◁ f) ▷ Z ≫ (α_ X Y' Z).hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem associator_inv_naturality_right (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft_symm (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
X ◁ Y ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (X ⊗ Y) ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').hom := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem leftUnitor_inv_naturality {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv = (λ_ X).inv ≫ _ ◁ f := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem id_whiskerLeft_symm {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f = (λ_ X).inv ≫ 𝟙_ C ◁ f ≫ (λ_ X').hom := by
simp only [id_whiskerLeft, assoc, inv_hom_id, comp_id, inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc]
theorem rightUnitor_inv_naturality {X X' : C} (f : X ⟶ X') :
f ≫ (ρ_ X').inv = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ _ := by simp
@[reassoc]
theorem whiskerRight_id_symm {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f = (ρ_ X).inv ≫ f ▷ 𝟙_ C ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom := by
simp
theorem whiskerLeft_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : 𝟙_ C ◁ f = 𝟙_ C ◁ g ↔ f = g := by simp
theorem whiskerRight_iff {X Y : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) : f ▷ 𝟙_ C = g ▷ 𝟙_ C ↔ f = g := by simp
/-! The lemmas in the next section are true by coherence,
but we prove them directly as they are used in proving the coherence theorem. -/
section
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv := by
rw [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv), ← cancel_mono (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_inv :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom =
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_inv :
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z := by
simp [← cancel_epi (W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_hom_hom :
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv =
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_inv_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z := by
rw [← cancel_epi (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv, ← cancel_mono ((α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z)]
simp
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_hom_hom_inv_inv_hom :
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv =
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_hom_hom_hom_hom :
(α_ W X Y).inv ▷ Z ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom =
(α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom := by
simp [← cancel_epi ((α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z)]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem pentagon_inv_inv_hom_inv_inv :
(α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).inv ≫ (α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z =
W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).inv ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).inv :=
eq_of_inv_eq_inv (by simp)
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 555 | 559 | theorem triangle_assoc_comp_right (X Y : C) :
(α_ X (𝟙_ C) Y).inv ≫ ((ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y) = X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom := by | rw [← triangle, Iso.inv_hom_id_assoc]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Batteries.Tactic.Congr
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Data.Set.SymmDiff
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Inclusion
/-!
# Images and preimages of sets
## Main definitions
* `preimage f t : Set α` : the preimage f⁻¹(t) (written `f ⁻¹' t` in Lean) of a subset of β.
* `range f : Set β` : the image of `univ` under `f`.
Also works for `{p : Prop} (f : p → α)` (unlike `image`)
## Notation
* `f ⁻¹' t` for `Set.preimage f t`
* `f '' s` for `Set.image f s`
## Tags
set, sets, image, preimage, pre-image, range
-/
assert_not_exists WithTop OrderIso
universe u v
open Function Set
namespace Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
/-! ### Inverse image -/
section Preimage
variable {f : α → β} {g : β → γ}
@[simp]
theorem preimage_empty : f ⁻¹' ∅ = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem preimage_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f ⁻¹' s = g ⁻¹' s := by
congr with x
simp [h]
@[gcongr]
theorem preimage_mono {s t : Set β} (h : s ⊆ t) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t := fun _ hx => h hx
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_univ : f ⁻¹' univ = univ :=
rfl
theorem subset_preimage_univ {s : Set α} : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' univ :=
subset_univ _
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_inter {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∩ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∩ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_union {s t : Set β} : f ⁻¹' (s ∪ t) = f ⁻¹' s ∪ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_compl {s : Set β} : f ⁻¹' sᶜ = (f ⁻¹' s)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s \ t) = f ⁻¹' s \ f ⁻¹' t :=
rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[simp]
lemma preimage_symmDiff {f : α → β} (s t : Set β) : f ⁻¹' (s ∆ t) = (f ⁻¹' s) ∆ (f ⁻¹' t) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_ite (f : α → β) (s t₁ t₂ : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s.ite t₁ t₂ = (f ⁻¹' s).ite (f ⁻¹' t₁) (f ⁻¹' t₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_setOf_eq {p : α → Prop} {f : β → α} : f ⁻¹' { a | p a } = { a | p (f a) } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_id_eq : preimage (id : α → α) = id :=
rfl
@[mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id {s : Set α} : id ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem preimage_id' {s : Set α} : (fun x => x) ⁻¹' s = s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∈ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => h
@[simp]
theorem preimage_const_of_not_mem {b : β} {s : Set β} (h : b ∉ s) : (fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun _ hx => h hx
theorem preimage_const (b : β) (s : Set β) [Decidable (b ∈ s)] :
(fun _ : α => b) ⁻¹' s = if b ∈ s then univ else ∅ := by
split_ifs with hb
exacts [preimage_const_of_mem hb, preimage_const_of_not_mem hb]
/-- If preimage of each singleton under `f : α → β` is either empty or the whole type,
then `f` is a constant. -/
lemma exists_eq_const_of_preimage_singleton [Nonempty β] {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ b : β, f ⁻¹' {b} = ∅ ∨ f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) : ∃ b, f = const α b := by
rcases em (∃ b, f ⁻¹' {b} = univ) with ⟨b, hb⟩ | hf'
· exact ⟨b, funext fun x ↦ eq_univ_iff_forall.1 hb x⟩
· have : ∀ x b, f x ≠ b := fun x b ↦
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.1 ((hf b).resolve_right fun h ↦ hf' ⟨b, h⟩) x
exact ⟨Classical.arbitrary β, funext fun x ↦ absurd rfl (this x _)⟩
theorem preimage_comp {s : Set γ} : g ∘ f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) :=
rfl
theorem preimage_comp_eq : preimage (g ∘ f) = preimage f ∘ preimage g :=
rfl
theorem preimage_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : Set.preimage f^[n] = (Set.preimage f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ, iterate_succ', preimage_comp_eq, ih]
theorem preimage_preimage {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} {s : Set γ} :
f ⁻¹' (g ⁻¹' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) ⁻¹' s :=
preimage_comp.symm
theorem eq_preimage_subtype_val_iff {p : α → Prop} {s : Set (Subtype p)} {t : Set α} :
s = Subtype.val ⁻¹' t ↔ ∀ (x) (h : p x), (⟨x, h⟩ : Subtype p) ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
⟨fun s_eq x h => by
rw [s_eq]
simp, fun h => ext fun ⟨x, hx⟩ => by simp [h]⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_preimage {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : (f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty) :
s.Nonempty :=
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf
⟨f x, hx⟩
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_true (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {True} = {a | p a} := by ext; simp
@[simp] theorem preimage_singleton_false (p : α → Prop) : p ⁻¹' {False} = {a | ¬p a} := by ext; simp
theorem preimage_subtype_coe_eq_compl {s u v : Set α} (hsuv : s ⊆ u ∪ v)
(H : s ∩ (u ∩ v) = ∅) : ((↑) : s → α) ⁻¹' u = ((↑) ⁻¹' v)ᶜ := by
ext ⟨x, x_in_s⟩
constructor
· intro x_in_u x_in_v
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp H x ⟨x_in_s, ⟨x_in_u, x_in_v⟩⟩
· intro hx
exact Or.elim (hsuv x_in_s) id fun hx' => hx.elim hx'
lemma preimage_subset {s t} (hs : s ⊆ f '' t) (hf : Set.InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : f ⁻¹' s ⊆ t := by
rintro a ha
obtain ⟨b, hb, hba⟩ := hs ha
rwa [hf ha _ hba.symm]
simpa [hba]
end Preimage
/-! ### Image of a set under a function -/
section Image
variable {f : α → β} {s t : Set α}
theorem image_eta (f : α → β) : f '' s = (fun x => f x) '' s :=
rfl
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.mem_set_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) {s : Set α} {a : α} :
f a ∈ f '' s ↔ a ∈ s :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hb, Eq⟩ => hf Eq ▸ hb, mem_image_of_mem f⟩
lemma preimage_subset_of_surjOn {t : Set β} (hf : Injective f) (h : SurjOn f s t) :
f ⁻¹' t ⊆ s := fun _ hx ↦
hf.mem_set_image.1 <| h hx
theorem forall_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → p (f x) := by simp
theorem exists_mem_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ f '' s, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, p (f x) := by simp
@[congr]
theorem image_congr {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ a ∈ s, f a = g a) : f '' s = g '' s := by
aesop
/-- A common special case of `image_congr` -/
theorem image_congr' {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x : α, f x = g x) : f '' s = g '' s :=
image_congr fun x _ => h x
@[gcongr]
lemma image_mono (h : s ⊆ t) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t := by
rintro - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact mem_image_of_mem f (h ha)
theorem image_comp (f : β → γ) (g : α → β) (a : Set α) : f ∘ g '' a = f '' (g '' a) := by aesop
theorem image_comp_eq {g : β → γ} : image (g ∘ f) = image g ∘ image f := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_comp`, useful for rewriting -/
theorem image_image (g : β → γ) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : g '' (f '' s) = (fun x => g (f x)) '' s :=
(image_comp g f s).symm
theorem image_comm {β'} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {f' : α → β'} {g' : β' → γ}
(h_comm : ∀ a, f (g a) = g' (f' a)) : (s.image g).image f = (s.image f').image g' := by
simp_rw [image_image, h_comm]
theorem _root_.Function.Semiconj.set_image {f : α → β} {ga : α → α} {gb : β → β}
(h : Function.Semiconj f ga gb) : Function.Semiconj (image f) (image ga) (image gb) := fun _ =>
image_comm h
theorem _root_.Function.Commute.set_image {f g : α → α} (h : Function.Commute f g) :
Function.Commute (image f) (image g) :=
Function.Semiconj.set_image h
/-- Image is monotone with respect to `⊆`. See `Set.monotone_image` for the statement in
terms of `≤`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem image_subset {a b : Set α} (f : α → β) (h : a ⊆ b) : f '' a ⊆ f '' b := by
simp only [subset_def, mem_image]
exact fun x => fun ⟨w, h1, h2⟩ => ⟨w, h h1, h2⟩
/-- `Set.image` is monotone. See `Set.image_subset` for the statement in terms of `⊆`. -/
lemma monotone_image {f : α → β} : Monotone (image f) := fun _ _ => image_subset _
theorem image_union (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∪ t) = f '' s ∪ f '' t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨by rintro ⟨a, h | h, rfl⟩ <;> [left; right] <;> exact ⟨_, h, rfl⟩, by
rintro (⟨a, h, rfl⟩ | ⟨a, h, rfl⟩) <;> refine ⟨_, ?_, rfl⟩
· exact mem_union_left t h
· exact mem_union_right s h⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_empty (f : α → β) : f '' ∅ = ∅ := by
ext
simp
theorem image_inter_subset (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s ∩ t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
subset_inter (image_subset _ inter_subset_left) (image_subset _ inter_subset_right)
theorem image_inter_on {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ s, f x = f y → x = y) :
f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
(image_inter_subset _ _ _).antisymm
fun b ⟨⟨a₁, ha₁, h₁⟩, ⟨a₂, ha₂, h₂⟩⟩ ↦
have : a₂ = a₁ := h _ ha₂ _ ha₁ (by simp [*])
⟨a₁, ⟨ha₁, this ▸ ha₂⟩, h₁⟩
theorem image_inter {f : α → β} {s t : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' (s ∩ t) = f '' s ∩ f '' t :=
image_inter_on fun _ _ _ _ h => H h
theorem image_univ_of_surjective {ι : Type*} {f : ι → β} (H : Surjective f) : f '' univ = univ :=
eq_univ_of_forall <| by simpa [image]
@[simp]
theorem image_singleton {f : α → β} {a : α} : f '' {a} = {f a} := by
ext
simp [image, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.image_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (a : β) : (fun _ => a) '' s = {a} :=
ext fun _ =>
⟨fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ => h ▸ mem_singleton _, fun h =>
(eq_of_mem_singleton h).symm ▸ hs.imp fun _ hy => ⟨hy, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem image_eq_empty {α β} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : f '' s = ∅ ↔ s = ∅ := by
simp only [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
exact ⟨fun H a ha => H _ ⟨_, ha, rfl⟩, fun H b ⟨_, ha, _⟩ => H _ ha⟩
theorem preimage_compl_eq_image_compl [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl ⁻¹' S = HasCompl.compl '' S :=
Set.ext fun x =>
⟨fun h => ⟨xᶜ, h, compl_compl x⟩, fun h =>
Exists.elim h fun _ hy => (compl_eq_comm.mp hy.2).symm.subst hy.1⟩
theorem mem_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (t : α) (S : Set α) :
t ∈ HasCompl.compl '' S ↔ tᶜ ∈ S := by
simp [← preimage_compl_eq_image_compl]
@[simp]
theorem image_id_eq : image (id : α → α) = id := by ext; simp
/-- A variant of `image_id` -/
@[simp]
theorem image_id' (s : Set α) : (fun x => x) '' s = s := by
ext
simp
theorem image_id (s : Set α) : id '' s = s := by simp
lemma image_iterate_eq {f : α → α} {n : ℕ} : image (f^[n]) = (image f)^[n] := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih => rw [iterate_succ', iterate_succ', ← ih, image_comp_eq]
theorem compl_compl_image [BooleanAlgebra α] (S : Set α) :
HasCompl.compl '' (HasCompl.compl '' S) = S := by
rw [← image_comp, compl_comp_compl, image_id]
theorem image_insert_eq {f : α → β} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
f '' insert a s = insert (f a) (f '' s) := by
ext
simp [and_or_left, exists_or, eq_comm, or_comm, and_comm]
theorem image_pair (f : α → β) (a b : α) : f '' {a, b} = {f a, f b} := by
simp only [image_insert_eq, image_singleton]
theorem image_subset_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set α) :
f '' s ⊆ g ⁻¹' s := fun _ ⟨a, h, e⟩ => e ▸ ((I a).symm ▸ h : g (f a) ∈ s)
theorem preimage_subset_image_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (I : LeftInverse g f) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s ⊆ g '' s := fun b h => ⟨f b, h, I b⟩
theorem range_inter_ssubset_iff_preimage_ssubset {f : α → β} {S S' : Set β} :
range f ∩ S ⊂ range f ∩ S' ↔ f ⁻¹' S ⊂ f ⁻¹' S' := by
simp only [Set.ssubset_iff_exists]
apply and_congr ?_ (by aesop)
constructor
all_goals
intro r x hx
simp_all only [subset_inter_iff, inter_subset_left, true_and, mem_preimage,
mem_inter_iff, mem_range, true_and]
aesop
theorem image_eq_preimage_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : image f = preimage g :=
funext fun s =>
Subset.antisymm (image_subset_preimage_of_inverse h₁ s) (preimage_subset_image_of_inverse h₂ s)
theorem mem_image_iff_of_inverse {f : α → β} {g : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set α} (h₁ : LeftInverse g f)
(h₂ : RightInverse g f) : b ∈ f '' s ↔ g b ∈ s := by
rw [image_eq_preimage_of_inverse h₁ h₂]; rfl
theorem image_compl_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Injective f) : f '' sᶜ ⊆ (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Disjoint.subset_compl_left <| by simp [disjoint_iff_inf_le, ← image_inter H]
theorem subset_image_compl {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Surjective f) : (f '' s)ᶜ ⊆ f '' sᶜ :=
compl_subset_iff_union.2 <| by
rw [← image_union]
simp [image_univ_of_surjective H]
theorem image_compl_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (H : Bijective f) : f '' sᶜ = (f '' s)ᶜ :=
Subset.antisymm (image_compl_subset H.1) (subset_image_compl H.2)
theorem subset_image_diff (f : α → β) (s t : Set α) : f '' s \ f '' t ⊆ f '' (s \ t) := by
rw [diff_subset_iff, ← image_union, union_diff_self]
exact image_subset f subset_union_right
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem subset_image_symmDiff : (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) ⊆ f '' s ∆ t :=
(union_subset_union (subset_image_diff _ _ _) <| subset_image_diff _ _ _).trans
(superset_of_eq (image_union _ _ _))
theorem image_diff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' (s \ t) = f '' s \ f '' t :=
Subset.antisymm
(Subset.trans (image_inter_subset _ _ _) <| inter_subset_inter_right _ <| image_compl_subset hf)
(subset_image_diff f s t)
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem image_symmDiff (hf : Injective f) (s t : Set α) : f '' s ∆ t = (f '' s) ∆ (f '' t) := by
simp_rw [Set.symmDiff_def, image_union, image_diff hf]
theorem Nonempty.image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} : s.Nonempty → (f '' s).Nonempty
| ⟨x, hx⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_image_of_mem f hx⟩
theorem Nonempty.of_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty → s.Nonempty
| ⟨_, x, hx, _⟩ => ⟨x, hx⟩
@[simp]
theorem image_nonempty {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : (f '' s).Nonempty ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨Nonempty.of_image, fun h => h.image f⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨y, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf y
⟨x, mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
instance (f : α → β) (s : Set α) [Nonempty s] : Nonempty (f '' s) :=
(Set.Nonempty.image f .of_subtype).to_subtype
/-- image and preimage are a Galois connection -/
@[simp]
theorem image_subset_iff {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} : f '' s ⊆ t ↔ s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t :=
forall_mem_image
theorem image_preimage_subset (f : α → β) (s : Set β) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) ⊆ s :=
image_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
theorem subset_preimage_image (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : s ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s) := fun _ =>
mem_image_of_mem f
theorem preimage_image_univ {f : α → β} : f ⁻¹' (f '' univ) = univ :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ _ => trivial) (subset_preimage_image f univ)
@[simp]
theorem preimage_image_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) : f ⁻¹' (f '' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ ⟨_, hy, e⟩ => h e ▸ hy) (subset_preimage_image f s)
@[simp]
theorem image_preimage_eq {f : α → β} (s : Set β) (h : Surjective f) : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s :=
Subset.antisymm (image_preimage_subset f s) fun x hx =>
let ⟨y, e⟩ := h x
⟨y, (e.symm ▸ hx : f y ∈ s), e⟩
@[simp]
theorem Nonempty.subset_preimage_const {s : Set α} (hs : Set.Nonempty s) (t : Set β) (a : β) :
s ⊆ (fun _ => a) ⁻¹' t ↔ a ∈ t := by
rw [← image_subset_iff, hs.image_const, singleton_subset_iff]
-- Note defeq abuse identifying `preimage` with function composition in the following two proofs.
@[simp]
theorem preimage_injective : Injective (preimage f) ↔ Surjective f :=
injective_comp_right_iff_surjective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_surjective : Surjective (preimage f) ↔ Injective f :=
surjective_comp_right_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_preimage {f : β → α} (hf : Surjective f) : f ⁻¹' s = f ⁻¹' t ↔ s = t :=
(preimage_injective.mpr hf).eq_iff
theorem image_inter_preimage (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s ∩ t := by
apply Subset.antisymm
· calc
f '' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∩ f '' (f ⁻¹' t) := image_inter_subset _ _ _
_ ⊆ f '' s ∩ t := inter_subset_inter_right _ (image_preimage_subset f t)
· rintro _ ⟨⟨x, h', rfl⟩, h⟩
exact ⟨x, ⟨h', h⟩, rfl⟩
theorem image_preimage_inter (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' t ∩ s) = t ∩ f '' s := by simp only [inter_comm, image_inter_preimage]
@[simp]
theorem image_inter_nonempty_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
(f '' s ∩ t).Nonempty ↔ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' t).Nonempty := by
rw [← image_inter_preimage, image_nonempty]
theorem image_diff_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
f '' (s \ f ⁻¹' t) = f '' s \ t := by simp_rw [diff_eq, ← preimage_compl, image_inter_preimage]
theorem compl_image : image (compl : Set α → Set α) = preimage compl :=
image_eq_preimage_of_inverse compl_compl compl_compl
theorem compl_image_set_of {p : Set α → Prop} : compl '' { s | p s } = { s | p sᶜ } :=
congr_fun compl_image p
theorem inter_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∩ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∩ t) := fun _ h => ⟨mem_image_of_mem _ h.left, h.right⟩
theorem union_preimage_subset (s : Set α) (t : Set β) (f : α → β) :
s ∪ f ⁻¹' t ⊆ f ⁻¹' (f '' s ∪ t) := fun _ h =>
Or.elim h (fun l => Or.inl <| mem_image_of_mem _ l) fun r => Or.inr r
theorem subset_image_union (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : f '' (s ∪ f ⁻¹' t) ⊆ f '' s ∪ t :=
image_subset_iff.2 (union_preimage_subset _ _ _)
theorem preimage_subset_iff {A : Set α} {B : Set β} {f : α → β} :
f ⁻¹' B ⊆ A ↔ ∀ a : α, f a ∈ B → a ∈ A :=
Iff.rfl
theorem image_eq_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s = f '' t ↔ s = t :=
Iff.symm <|
(Iff.intro fun eq => eq ▸ rfl) fun eq => by
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf, eq]
theorem subset_image_iff {t : Set β} :
t ⊆ f '' s ↔ ∃ u, u ⊆ s ∧ f '' u = t := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨f ⁻¹' t ∩ s, inter_subset_right, ?_⟩,
fun ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ ↦ hu'.symm ▸ image_mono hu⟩
rwa [image_preimage_inter, inter_eq_left]
@[simp]
lemma exists_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∃ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∃ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
@[simp]
lemma forall_subset_image_iff {p : Set β → Prop} : (∀ t ⊆ f '' s, p t) ↔ ∀ t ⊆ s, p (f '' t) := by
simp [subset_image_iff]
theorem image_subset_image_iff {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) : f '' s ⊆ f '' t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
refine Iff.symm <| (Iff.intro (image_subset f)) fun h => ?_
rw [← preimage_image_eq s hf, ← preimage_image_eq t hf]
exact preimage_mono h
theorem prod_quotient_preimage_eq_image [s : Setoid α] (g : Quotient s → β) {h : α → β}
(Hh : h = g ∘ Quotient.mk'') (r : Set (β × β)) :
{ x : Quotient s × Quotient s | (g x.1, g x.2) ∈ r } =
(fun a : α × α => (⟦a.1⟧, ⟦a.2⟧)) '' ((fun a : α × α => (h a.1, h a.2)) ⁻¹' r) :=
Hh.symm ▸
Set.ext fun ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ =>
⟨Quot.induction_on₂ a₁ a₂ fun a₁ a₂ h => ⟨(a₁, a₂), h, rfl⟩, fun ⟨⟨b₁, b₂⟩, h₁, h₂⟩ =>
show (g a₁, g a₂) ∈ r from
have h₃ : ⟦b₁⟧ = a₁ ∧ ⟦b₂⟧ = a₂ := Prod.ext_iff.1 h₂
h₃.1 ▸ h₃.2 ▸ h₁⟩
theorem exists_image_iff (f : α → β) (x : Set α) (P : β → Prop) :
(∃ a : f '' x, P a) ↔ ∃ a : x, P (f a) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, h⟩ => ⟨⟨_, a.prop.choose_spec.1⟩, a.prop.choose_spec.2.symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨a, h⟩ =>
⟨⟨_, _, a.prop, rfl⟩, h⟩⟩
theorem imageFactorization_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
Subtype.val ∘ imageFactorization f s = f ∘ Subtype.val :=
funext fun _ => rfl
theorem surjective_onto_image {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : Surjective (imageFactorization f s) :=
fun ⟨_, ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩⟩ => ⟨⟨a, ha⟩, rfl⟩
/-- If the only elements outside `s` are those left fixed by `σ`, then mapping by `σ` has no effect.
-/
theorem image_perm {s : Set α} {σ : Equiv.Perm α} (hs : { a : α | σ a ≠ a } ⊆ s) : σ '' s = s := by
ext i
obtain hi | hi := eq_or_ne (σ i) i
· refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩⟩
rintro ⟨j, hj, h⟩
rwa [σ.injective (hi.trans h.symm)]
· refine iff_of_true ⟨σ.symm i, hs fun h => hi ?_, σ.apply_symm_apply _⟩ (hs hi)
convert congr_arg σ h <;> exact (σ.apply_symm_apply _).symm
end Image
/-! ### Lemmas about the powerset and image. -/
/-- The powerset of `{a} ∪ s` is `𝒫 s` together with `{a} ∪ t` for each `t ∈ 𝒫 s`. -/
theorem powerset_insert (s : Set α) (a : α) : 𝒫 insert a s = 𝒫 s ∪ insert a '' 𝒫 s := by
ext t
simp_rw [mem_union, mem_image, mem_powerset_iff]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hs : a ∈ t
· right
refine ⟨t \ {a}, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [diff_singleton_subset_iff]
assumption
· rw [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hs]
· left
exact (subset_insert_iff_of_not_mem hs).mp h
· rintro (h | ⟨s', h₁, rfl⟩)
· exact subset_trans h (subset_insert a s)
· exact insert_subset_insert h₁
/-! ### Lemmas about range of a function. -/
section Range
variable {f : ι → α} {s t : Set α}
theorem forall_mem_range {p : α → Prop} : (∀ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem forall_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∀ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∀ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun H _ => H _, fun H ⟨y, i, hi⟩ => by
subst hi
apply H⟩
theorem exists_range_iff {p : α → Prop} : (∃ a ∈ range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p (f i) := by simp
theorem exists_subtype_range_iff {p : range f → Prop} :
(∃ a : range f, p a) ↔ ∃ i, p ⟨f i, mem_range_self _⟩ :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨a, i, hi⟩, ha⟩ => by
subst a
exact ⟨i, ha⟩,
fun ⟨_, hi⟩ => ⟨_, hi⟩⟩
theorem range_eq_univ : range f = univ ↔ Surjective f :=
eq_univ_iff_forall
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-11")] alias range_iff_surjective := range_eq_univ
alias ⟨_, _root_.Function.Surjective.range_eq⟩ := range_eq_univ
@[simp]
theorem subset_range_of_surjective {f : α → β} (h : Surjective f) (s : Set β) :
s ⊆ range f := Surjective.range_eq h ▸ subset_univ s
@[simp]
theorem image_univ {f : α → β} : f '' univ = range f := by
ext
simp [image, range]
lemma image_compl_eq_range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) :
f '' sᶜ = range f \ f '' s := by rw [← image_univ, ← image_diff hf, compl_eq_univ_diff]
/-- Alias of `Set.image_compl_eq_range_sdiff_image`. -/
lemma range_diff_image {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) (s : Set α) : range f \ f '' s = f '' sᶜ := by
rw [image_compl_eq_range_diff_image hf]
@[simp]
theorem preimage_eq_univ_iff {f : α → β} {s} : f ⁻¹' s = univ ↔ range f ⊆ s := by
rw [← univ_subset_iff, ← image_subset_iff, image_univ]
theorem image_subset_range (f : α → β) (s) : f '' s ⊆ range f := by
rw [← image_univ]; exact image_subset _ (subset_univ _)
theorem mem_range_of_mem_image (f : α → β) (s) {x : β} (h : x ∈ f '' s) : x ∈ range f :=
image_subset_range f s h
theorem _root_.Nat.mem_range_succ (i : ℕ) : i ∈ range Nat.succ ↔ 0 < i :=
⟨by
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact Nat.succ_pos n, fun h => ⟨_, Nat.succ_pred_eq_of_pos h⟩⟩
theorem Nonempty.preimage' {s : Set β} (hs : s.Nonempty) {f : α → β} (hf : s ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Nonempty :=
let ⟨_, hy⟩ := hs
let ⟨x, hx⟩ := hf hy
⟨x, Set.mem_preimage.2 <| hx.symm ▸ hy⟩
theorem range_comp (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (g ∘ f) = g '' range f := by aesop
/--
Variant of `range_comp` using a lambda instead of function composition.
-/
theorem range_comp' (g : α → β) (f : ι → α) : range (fun x => g (f x)) = g '' range f :=
range_comp g f
theorem range_subset_iff : range f ⊆ s ↔ ∀ y, f y ∈ s :=
forall_mem_range
theorem range_subset_range_iff_exists_comp {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} :
range f ⊆ range g ↔ ∃ h : α → β, f = g ∘ h := by
simp only [range_subset_iff, mem_range, Classical.skolem, funext_iff, (· ∘ ·), eq_comm]
theorem range_eq_iff (f : α → β) (s : Set β) :
range f = s ↔ (∀ a, f a ∈ s) ∧ ∀ b ∈ s, ∃ a, f a = b := by
rw [← range_subset_iff]
exact le_antisymm_iff
theorem range_comp_subset_range (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) : range (g ∘ f) ⊆ range g := by
rw [range_comp]; apply image_subset_range
theorem range_nonempty_iff_nonempty : (range f).Nonempty ↔ Nonempty ι :=
⟨fun ⟨_, x, _⟩ => ⟨x⟩, fun ⟨x⟩ => ⟨f x, mem_range_self x⟩⟩
theorem range_nonempty [h : Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : (range f).Nonempty :=
range_nonempty_iff_nonempty.2 h
@[simp]
theorem range_eq_empty_iff {f : ι → α} : range f = ∅ ↔ IsEmpty ι := by
rw [← not_nonempty_iff, ← range_nonempty_iff_nonempty, not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
theorem range_eq_empty [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → α) : range f = ∅ :=
range_eq_empty_iff.2 ‹_›
instance instNonemptyRange [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → α) : Nonempty (range f) :=
(range_nonempty f).to_subtype
@[simp]
theorem image_union_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) : f '' s ∪ f '' sᶜ = range f := by
rw [← image_union, ← image_univ, ← union_compl_self]
theorem insert_image_compl_eq_range (f : α → β) (x : α) : insert (f x) (f '' {x}ᶜ) = range f := by
rw [← image_insert_eq, insert_eq, union_compl_self, image_univ]
theorem image_preimage_eq_range_inter {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = range f ∩ t :=
ext fun x =>
⟨fun ⟨_, hx, HEq⟩ => HEq ▸ ⟨mem_range_self _, hx⟩, fun ⟨⟨y, h_eq⟩, hx⟩ =>
h_eq ▸ mem_image_of_mem f <| show y ∈ f ⁻¹' t by rw [preimage, mem_setOf, h_eq]; exact hx⟩
theorem image_preimage_eq_inter_range {f : α → β} {t : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' t) = t ∩ range f := by
rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_comm]
theorem image_preimage_eq_of_subset {f : α → β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range f) :
f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s := by rw [image_preimage_eq_range_inter, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hs]
theorem image_preimage_eq_iff {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : f '' (f ⁻¹' s) = s ↔ s ⊆ range f :=
⟨by
intro h
rw [← h]
apply image_subset_range,
image_preimage_eq_of_subset⟩
theorem subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq {f : α → β} {s : Set β} : s ⊆ range f ↔ ∃ t, f '' t = s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, image_preimage_eq_iff.2 h⟩, fun ⟨_, ht⟩ => ht ▸ image_subset_range _ _⟩
theorem range_image (f : α → β) : range (image f) = 𝒫 range f :=
ext fun _ => subset_range_iff_exists_image_eq.symm
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Image.lean | 707 | 708 | theorem exists_subset_range_and_iff {f : α → β} {p : Set β → Prop} :
(∃ s, s ⊆ range f ∧ p s) ↔ ∃ s, p (f '' s) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Basic
/-!
# Primality and GCD on pnat
This file extends the theory of `ℕ+` with `gcd`, `lcm` and `Prime` functions, analogous to those on
`Nat`.
-/
namespace Nat.Primes
/-- The canonical map from `Nat.Primes` to `ℕ+` -/
@[coe] def toPNat : Nat.Primes → ℕ+ :=
fun p => ⟨(p : ℕ), p.property.pos⟩
instance coePNat : Coe Nat.Primes ℕ+ :=
⟨toPNat⟩
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_nat (p : Nat.Primes) : ((p : ℕ+) : ℕ) = p :=
rfl
theorem coe_pnat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) := fun p q h =>
Subtype.ext (by injection h)
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_pnat_inj (p q : Nat.Primes) : (p : ℕ+) = (q : ℕ+) ↔ p = q :=
coe_pnat_injective.eq_iff
end Nat.Primes
namespace PNat
open Nat
/-- The greatest common divisor (gcd) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def gcd (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left (m : ℕ) n.pos⟩
/-- The least common multiple (lcm) of two positive natural numbers,
viewed as positive natural number. -/
def lcm (n m : ℕ+) : ℕ+ :=
⟨Nat.lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), by
let h := mul_pos n.pos m.pos
rw [← gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ), mul_comm] at h
exact pos_of_dvd_of_pos (Dvd.intro (Nat.gcd (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ)) rfl) h⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem gcd_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (gcd n m : ℕ) = Nat.gcd n m :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem lcm_coe (n m : ℕ+) : (lcm n m : ℕ) = Nat.lcm n m :=
rfl
theorem gcd_dvd_left (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem gcd_dvd_right (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m ∣ m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.gcd_dvd_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem dvd_gcd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : k ∣ m) (hn : k ∣ n) : k ∣ gcd m n :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_gcd (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
theorem dvd_lcm_left (n m : ℕ+) : n ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_left (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem dvd_lcm_right (n m : ℕ+) : m ∣ lcm n m :=
dvd_iff.2 (Nat.dvd_lcm_right (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem lcm_dvd {m n k : ℕ+} (hm : m ∣ k) (hn : n ∣ k) : lcm m n ∣ k :=
dvd_iff.2 (@Nat.lcm_dvd (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (k : ℕ) (dvd_iff.1 hm) (dvd_iff.1 hn))
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (n m : ℕ+) : gcd n m * lcm n m = n * m :=
Subtype.eq (Nat.gcd_mul_lcm (n : ℕ) (m : ℕ))
theorem eq_one_of_lt_two {n : ℕ+} : n < 2 → n = 1 := by
intro h; apply le_antisymm; swap
· apply PNat.one_le
· exact PNat.lt_add_one_iff.1 h
section Prime
/-! ### Prime numbers -/
/-- Primality predicate for `ℕ+`, defined in terms of `Nat.Prime`. -/
def Prime (p : ℕ+) : Prop :=
(p : ℕ).Prime
theorem Prime.one_lt {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → 1 < p :=
Nat.Prime.one_lt
theorem prime_two : (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_two
instance {p : ℕ+} [h : Fact p.Prime] : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime := h
instance fact_prime_two : Fact (2 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_two⟩
theorem prime_three : (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_three
instance fact_prime_three : Fact (3 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_three⟩
theorem prime_five : (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.prime_five
instance fact_prime_five : Fact (5 : ℕ+).Prime :=
⟨prime_five⟩
theorem dvd_prime {p m : ℕ+} (pp : p.Prime) : m ∣ p ↔ m = 1 ∨ m = p := by
rw [PNat.dvd_iff]
rw [Nat.dvd_prime pp]
simp
theorem Prime.ne_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → p ≠ 1 := by
intro pp
intro contra
apply Nat.Prime.ne_one pp
rw [PNat.coe_eq_one_iff]
apply contra
@[simp]
theorem not_prime_one : ¬(1 : ℕ+).Prime :=
Nat.not_prime_one
theorem Prime.not_dvd_one {p : ℕ+} : p.Prime → ¬p ∣ 1 := fun pp : p.Prime => by
rw [dvd_iff]
apply Nat.Prime.not_dvd_one pp
theorem exists_prime_and_dvd {n : ℕ+} (hn : n ≠ 1) : ∃ p : ℕ+, p.Prime ∧ p ∣ n := by
obtain ⟨p, hp⟩ := Nat.exists_prime_and_dvd (mt coe_eq_one_iff.mp hn)
exists (⟨p, Nat.Prime.pos hp.left⟩ : ℕ+); rw [dvd_iff]; apply hp
end Prime
section Coprime
/-! ### Coprime numbers and gcd -/
/-- Two pnats are coprime if their gcd is 1. -/
def Coprime (m n : ℕ+) : Prop :=
m.gcd n = 1
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coprime_coe {m n : ℕ+} : Nat.Coprime ↑m ↑n ↔ m.Coprime n := by
unfold Nat.Coprime Coprime
rw [← coe_inj]
simp
theorem Coprime.mul {k m n : ℕ+} : m.Coprime k → n.Coprime k → (m * n).Coprime k := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul
theorem Coprime.mul_right {k m n : ℕ+} : k.Coprime m → k.Coprime n → k.Coprime (m * n) := by
repeat rw [← coprime_coe]
rw [mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.mul_right
theorem gcd_comm {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = n.gcd m := by
apply eq
simp only [gcd_coe]
apply Nat.gcd_comm
theorem gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : m.gcd n = m ↔ m ∣ n := by
rw [dvd_iff, ← Nat.gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd, ← coe_inj]
simp
theorem gcd_eq_right_iff_dvd {m n : ℕ+} : n.gcd m = m ↔ m ∣ n := by
rw [gcd_comm]
apply gcd_eq_left_iff_dvd
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Prime.lean | 186 | 189 | theorem Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel (m : ℕ+) {n k : ℕ+} :
k.Coprime n → (k * m).gcd n = m.gcd n := by | intro h; apply eq; simp only [gcd_coe, mul_coe]
apply Nat.Coprime.gcd_mul_left_cancel; simpa |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Andreas Swerdlow. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Andreas Swerdlow
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.BilinearMap
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Lemmas
/-!
# Sesquilinear maps
This files provides properties about sesquilinear maps and forms. The maps considered are of the
form `M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M`, where `I₁ : R₁ →+* R` and `I₂ : R₂ →+* R` are ring homomorphisms and
`M₁` is a module over `R₁`, `M₂` is a module over `R₂` and `M` is a module over `R`.
Sesquilinear forms are the special case that `M₁ = M₂`, `M = R₁ = R₂ = R`, and `I₁ = RingHom.id R`.
Taking additionally `I₂ = RingHom.id R`, then one obtains bilinear forms.
Sesquilinear maps are a special case of the bilinear maps defined in `BilinearMap.lean` and `many`
basic lemmas about construction and elementary calculations are found there.
## Main declarations
* `IsOrtho`: states that two vectors are orthogonal with respect to a sesquilinear map
* `IsSymm`, `IsAlt`: states that a sesquilinear form is symmetric and alternating, respectively
* `orthogonalBilin`: provides the orthogonal complement with respect to sesquilinear form
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sesquilinear_form#Over_arbitrary_rings>
## Tags
Sesquilinear form, Sesquilinear map,
-/
variable {R R₁ R₂ R₃ M M₁ M₂ M₃ Mₗ₁ Mₗ₁' Mₗ₂ Mₗ₂' K K₁ K₂ V V₁ V₂ n : Type*}
namespace LinearMap
/-! ### Orthogonal vectors -/
section CommRing
-- the `ₗ` subscript variables are for special cases about linear (as opposed to semilinear) maps
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [Module R₁ M₁] [CommSemiring R₂]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R₂ M₂] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
{I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₂ →+* R} {I₁' : R₁ →+* R}
/-- The proposition that two elements of a sesquilinear map space are orthogonal -/
def IsOrtho (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x : M₁) (y : M₂) : Prop :=
B x y = 0
theorem isOrtho_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M} {x y} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B x y = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOrtho_zero_left (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x) : IsOrtho B (0 : M₁) x := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
rw [map_zero B, zero_apply]
theorem isOrtho_zero_right (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) (x) : IsOrtho B x (0 : M₂) :=
map_zero (B x)
theorem isOrtho_flip {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M} {x y} : B.IsOrtho x y ↔ B.flip.IsOrtho y x := by
simp_rw [isOrtho_def, flip_apply]
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
/-- A set of vectors `v` is orthogonal with respect to some bilinear map `B` if and only
if for all `i ≠ j`, `B (v i) (v j) = 0`. For orthogonality between two elements, use
`BilinForm.isOrtho` -/
def IsOrthoᵢ (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M) (v : n → M₁) : Prop :=
Pairwise (B.IsOrtho on v)
theorem isOrthoᵢ_def {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M} {v : n → M₁} :
B.IsOrthoᵢ v ↔ ∀ i j : n, i ≠ j → B (v i) (v j) = 0 :=
Iff.rfl
theorem isOrthoᵢ_flip (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] M) {v : n → M₁} :
B.IsOrthoᵢ v ↔ B.flip.IsOrthoᵢ v := by
simp_rw [isOrthoᵢ_def]
constructor <;> exact fun h i j hij ↦ h j i hij.symm
end CommRing
section Field
variable [Field K] [AddCommGroup V] [Module K V] [Field K₁] [AddCommGroup V₁] [Module K₁ V₁]
[Field K₂] [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module K₂ V₂]
{I₁ : K₁ →+* K} {I₂ : K₂ →+* K} {I₁' : K₁ →+* K} {J₁ : K →+* K} {J₂ : K →+* K}
-- todo: this also holds for [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] when J₁ is invertible
theorem ortho_smul_left {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] V} {x y} {a : K₁} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B (a • x) y := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
constructor <;> intro H
· rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, H, smul_zero]
· rw [map_smulₛₗ₂, smul_eq_zero] at H
rcases H with H | H
· rw [map_eq_zero I₁] at H
trivial
· exact H
-- todo: this also holds for [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] when J₂ is invertible
theorem ortho_smul_right {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₂ →ₛₗ[I₂] V} {x y} {a : K₂} {ha : a ≠ 0} :
IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B x (a • y) := by
dsimp only [IsOrtho]
constructor <;> intro H
· rw [map_smulₛₗ, H, smul_zero]
· rw [map_smulₛₗ, smul_eq_zero] at H
rcases H with H | H
· simp only [map_eq_zero] at H
exfalso
exact ha H
· exact H
/-- A set of orthogonal vectors `v` with respect to some sesquilinear map `B` is linearly
independent if for all `i`, `B (v i) (v i) ≠ 0`. -/
theorem linearIndependent_of_isOrthoᵢ {B : V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] V₁ →ₛₗ[I₁'] V} {v : n → V₁}
(hv₁ : B.IsOrthoᵢ v) (hv₂ : ∀ i, ¬B.IsOrtho (v i) (v i)) : LinearIndependent K₁ v := by
classical
rw [linearIndependent_iff']
intro s w hs i hi
have : B (s.sum fun i : n ↦ w i • v i) (v i) = 0 := by rw [hs, map_zero, zero_apply]
have hsum : (s.sum fun j : n ↦ I₁ (w j) • B (v j) (v i)) = I₁ (w i) • B (v i) (v i) := by
apply Finset.sum_eq_single_of_mem i hi
intro j _hj hij
rw [isOrthoᵢ_def.1 hv₁ _ _ hij, smul_zero]
simp_rw [B.map_sum₂, map_smulₛₗ₂, hsum] at this
apply (map_eq_zero I₁).mp
exact (smul_eq_zero.mp this).elim _root_.id (hv₂ i · |>.elim)
end Field
/-! ### Reflexive bilinear maps -/
section Reflexive
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear map is reflexive -/
def IsRefl (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Prop :=
∀ x y, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0
namespace IsRefl
section
variable (H : B.IsRefl)
include H
theorem eq_zero : ∀ {x y}, B x y = 0 → B y x = 0 := fun {x y} ↦ H x y
theorem eq_iff {x y} : B x y = 0 ↔ B y x = 0 := ⟨H x y, H y x⟩
theorem ortho_comm {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
⟨eq_zero H, eq_zero H⟩
theorem domRestrict (p : Submodule R₁ M₁) : (B.domRestrict₁₂ p p).IsRefl :=
fun _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [domRestrict₁₂_apply]
exact H _ _
end
@[simp]
theorem flip_isRefl_iff : B.flip.IsRefl ↔ B.IsRefl :=
⟨fun h x y H ↦ h y x ((B.flip_apply _ _).trans H), fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
theorem ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.IsRefl) (h : LinearMap.ker B = ⊥) : LinearMap.ker B.flip = ⊥ := by
refine ker_eq_bot'.mpr fun _ hx ↦ ker_eq_bot'.mp h _ ?_
ext
exact H _ _ (LinearMap.congr_fun hx _)
theorem ker_eq_bot_iff_ker_flip_eq_bot (H : B.IsRefl) :
LinearMap.ker B = ⊥ ↔ LinearMap.ker B.flip = ⊥ := by
refine ⟨ker_flip_eq_bot H, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
exact (congr_arg _ B.flip_flip.symm).trans (ker_flip_eq_bot (flip_isRefl_iff.mpr H) h)
end IsRefl
end Reflexive
/-! ### Symmetric bilinear forms -/
section Symmetric
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {I : R →+* R} {B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear form is symmetric -/
def IsSymm (B : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R) : Prop :=
∀ x y, I (B x y) = B y x
namespace IsSymm
protected theorem eq (H : B.IsSymm) (x y) : I (B x y) = B y x :=
H x y
theorem isRefl (H : B.IsSymm) : B.IsRefl := fun x y H1 ↦ by
rw [← H.eq]
simp [H1]
theorem ortho_comm (H : B.IsSymm) {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
H.isRefl.ortho_comm
theorem domRestrict (H : B.IsSymm) (p : Submodule R M) : (B.domRestrict₁₂ p p).IsSymm :=
fun _ _ ↦ by
simp_rw [domRestrict₁₂_apply]
exact H _ _
end IsSymm
@[simp]
theorem isSymm_zero : (0 : M →ₛₗ[I] M →ₗ[R] R).IsSymm := fun _ _ => map_zero _
theorem BilinMap.isSymm_iff_eq_flip {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
{B : LinearMap.BilinMap R M N} : (∀ x y, B x y = B y x) ↔ B = B.flip := by
simp [LinearMap.ext_iff₂]
theorem isSymm_iff_eq_flip {B : LinearMap.BilinForm R M} : B.IsSymm ↔ B = B.flip :=
BilinMap.isSymm_iff_eq_flip
end Symmetric
/-! ### Alternating bilinear maps -/
section Alternating
section CommSemiring
section AddCommMonoid
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {I : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
/-- The proposition that a sesquilinear map is alternating -/
def IsAlt (B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M) : Prop :=
∀ x, B x x = 0
variable (H : B.IsAlt)
include H
theorem IsAlt.self_eq_zero (x : M₁) : B x x = 0 :=
H x
theorem IsAlt.eq_of_add_add_eq_zero [IsCancelAdd M] {a b c : M₁} (hAdd : a + b + c = 0) :
B a b = B b c := by
have : B a a + B a b + B a c = B a c + B b c + B c c := by
simp_rw [← map_add, ← map_add₂, hAdd, map_zero, LinearMap.zero_apply]
rw [H, H, zero_add, add_zero, add_comm] at this
exact add_left_cancel this
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
namespace IsAlt
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I₁ : R₁ →+* R} {I₂ : R₁ →+* R} {I : R₁ →+* R} {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I₁] M₁ →ₛₗ[I₂] M}
theorem neg (H : B.IsAlt) (x y : M₁) : -B x y = B y x := by
have H1 : B (y + x) (y + x) = 0 := self_eq_zero H (y + x)
simp? [map_add, self_eq_zero H] at H1 says
simp only [map_add, add_apply, self_eq_zero H, zero_add, add_zero] at H1
rw [add_eq_zero_iff_neg_eq] at H1
exact H1
theorem isRefl (H : B.IsAlt) : B.IsRefl := by
intro x y h
rw [← neg H, h, neg_zero]
theorem ortho_comm (H : B.IsAlt) {x y} : IsOrtho B x y ↔ IsOrtho B y x :=
H.isRefl.ortho_comm
end IsAlt
end AddCommGroup
end CommSemiring
section Semiring
variable [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [CommSemiring R₁] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[Module R₁ M₁] {I : R₁ →+* R}
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/SesquilinearForm.lean | 289 | 294 | theorem isAlt_iff_eq_neg_flip [NoZeroDivisors R] [CharZero R] {B : M₁ →ₛₗ[I] M₁ →ₛₗ[I] R} :
B.IsAlt ↔ B = -B.flip := by | constructor <;> intro h
· ext
simp_rw [neg_apply, flip_apply]
exact (h.neg _ _).symm |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Tian Chen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tian Chen, Mantas Bakšys
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GeomSum
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Parity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Sum
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Prime.Int
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Span
/-!
# Multiplicity in Number Theory
This file contains results in number theory relating to multiplicity.
## Main statements
* `multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow` is the lifting the exponent lemma for odd primes.
We also prove several variations of the lemma.
## References
* [Wikipedia, *Lifting-the-exponent lemma*]
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifting-the-exponent_lemma)
-/
open Ideal Ideal.Quotient Finset
variable {R : Type*} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {a b x y : R}
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * y ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at h
simp only [← mem_span_singleton, ← eq_zero_iff_mem, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, h, geom_sum₂_self,
map_mul, map_pow, map_natCast]
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' {x y p : R} (h : p ∣ x - y) :
(p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i)) ↔ p ∣ n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [geom_sum₂_comm, dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub]; simpa using h.neg_right
theorem dvd_geom_sum₂_self {x y : R} (h : ↑n ∣ x - y) :
↑n ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) :=
(dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub h).mpr (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (p x : R) (n : ℕ) :
p ^ 2 ∣ (x + p) ^ n - x ^ (n - 1) * p * n - x ^ n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [pow_zero, Nat.cast_zero, sub_zero, sub_self, dvd_zero, mul_zero]
· simp only [Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub, tsub_zero, Nat.cast_succ, add_pow, Finset.sum_range_succ,
Nat.choose_self, Nat.succ_sub _, tsub_self, pow_one, Nat.choose_succ_self_right, pow_zero,
mul_one, Nat.cast_zero, zero_add, Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_tsub_cancel_left]
suffices p ^ 2 ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * p ^ (n + 1 - i) * ↑((n + 1).choose i) by
convert this; abel
apply Finset.dvd_sum
intro y hy
calc
p ^ 2 ∣ p ^ (n + 1 - y) :=
pow_dvd_pow p (le_tsub_of_add_le_left (by linarith [Finset.mem_range.mp hy]))
_ ∣ x ^ y * p ^ (n + 1 - y) * ↑((n + 1).choose y) :=
dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left _ _) _
theorem not_dvd_geom_sum₂ {p : R} (hp : Prime p) (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
¬p ∣ ∑ i ∈ range n, x ^ i * y ^ (n - 1 - i) := fun h =>
hx <|
hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow <| (hp.dvd_or_dvd <| (dvd_geom_sum₂_iff_of_dvd_sub' hxy).mp h).resolve_left hn
variable {p : ℕ} (a b)
theorem odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub (hp : Odd p) :
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + p * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) - p * a ^ (p - 1) := by
have h1 : ∀ (i : ℕ),
(p : R) ^ 2 ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * i + a ^ i) := by
intro i
calc
↑p ^ 2 ∣ (↑p * b) ^ 2 := by simp only [mul_pow, dvd_mul_right]
_ ∣ (a + ↑p * b) ^ i - (a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) := by
simp only [sq_dvd_add_pow_sub_sub (↑p * b) a i, ← sub_sub]
simp_rw [← mem_span_singleton, ← Ideal.Quotient.eq] at *
let s : R := (p : R)^2
calc
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (span {s})) (∑ i ∈ range p, (a + (p : R) * b) ^ i * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) =
∑ i ∈ Finset.range p,
mk (span {s}) ((a ^ (i - 1) * (↑p * b) * ↑i + a ^ i) * a ^ (p - 1 - i)) := by
simp_rw [s, RingHom.map_geom_sum₂, ← map_pow, h1, ← map_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x))) := by
ring_nf
simp_rw [← map_sum, sum_add_distrib, map_add]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (∑ _x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 1)) := by
rw [add_right_inj]
have : ∀ (x : ℕ), (hx : x ∈ range p) → a ^ (x + (p - 1 - x)) = a ^ (p - 1) := by
intro x hx
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc _ x, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx)
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl this]
_ =
mk (span {s})
(∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (x - 1) * (a ^ (p - 1 - x) * (↑p * (b * ↑x)))) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [add_right_inj, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_range, nsmul_eq_mul]
_ =
mk (span {s}) (↑p * b * ∑ x ∈ Finset.range p, a ^ (p - 2) * x) +
mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_add]
rw [Finset.sum_congr rfl]
rintro (⟨⟩ | ⟨x⟩) hx
· rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, mul_zero]
· have : x.succ - 1 + (p - 1 - x.succ) = p - 2 := by
rw [← Nat.add_sub_assoc (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (Finset.mem_range.mp hx))]
exact congr_arg Nat.pred (Nat.add_sub_cancel_left _ _)
rw [this]
ring1
_ = mk (span {s}) (↑p * a ^ (p - 1)) := by
have : Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : R)) =
((Finset.sum (range p) (fun (x : ℕ) ↦ (x : ℕ)))) := by simp only [Nat.cast_sum]
simp only [add_eq_right, ← Finset.mul_sum, this]
norm_cast
simp only [Finset.sum_range_id]
norm_cast
simp only [Nat.cast_mul, map_mul,
Nat.mul_div_assoc p (even_iff_two_dvd.mp (Nat.Odd.sub_odd hp odd_one))]
ring_nf
rw [mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
refine mul_eq_zero_of_left ?_ _
refine Ideal.Quotient.eq_zero_iff_mem.mpr ?_
simp [s, mem_span_singleton]
section IntegralDomain
variable [IsDomain R]
theorem emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime {p : R} (hp : Prime p) {x y : R}
(hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) {n : ℕ} (hn : ¬p ∣ n) :
emultiplicity p (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity p (x - y) := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, emultiplicity_mul hp,
emultiplicity_eq_zero.2 (not_dvd_geom_sum₂ hp hxy hx hn), zero_add]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_sub_pow_of_prime := emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime
variable (hp : Prime (p : R)) (hp1 : Odd p) (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x)
include hp hp1 hxy hx
theorem emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one :
emultiplicity (↑p) (∑ i ∈ range p, x ^ i * y ^ (p - 1 - i)) = 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_one]
refine emultiplicity_eq_coe.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rw [pow_one]
exact dvd_geom_sum₂_self hxy
rw [dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub hxy] at hx
obtain ⟨k, hk⟩ := hxy
rw [one_add_one_eq_two, eq_add_of_sub_eq' hk]
refine mt (dvd_iff_dvd_of_dvd_sub (@odd_sq_dvd_geom_sum₂_sub _ _ y k _ hp1)).mp ?_
rw [pow_two, mul_dvd_mul_iff_left hp.ne_zero]
exact mt hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow hx
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.geom_sum₂_eq_one := emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one
theorem emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p - y ^ p) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + 1 := by
rw [← geom_sum₂_mul, emultiplicity_mul hp, emultiplicity_geom_sum₂_eq_one hp hp1 hxy hx, add_comm]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_prime_sub_pow_prime := emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime
theorem emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow (a : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ p ^ a - y ^ p ^ a) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + a := by
induction a with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, add_zero, pow_zero, pow_one, pow_one]
| succ a h_ind =>
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, ← add_assoc, ← h_ind, pow_succ, pow_mul, pow_mul]
apply emultiplicity_pow_prime_sub_pow_prime hp hp1
· rw [← geom_sum₂_mul]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy _
· exact fun h => hx (hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow h)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow := emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow
end IntegralDomain
section LiftingTheExponent
variable (hp : Nat.Prime p) (hp1 : Odd p)
include hp hp1
/-- **Lifting the exponent lemma** for odd primes. -/
theorem Int.emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow {x y : ℤ} (hxy : ↑p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x) (n : ℕ) :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x - y) + emultiplicity p n := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [emultiplicity_zero, add_top, pow_zero, sub_self]
have h : FiniteMultiplicity _ _ := Nat.finiteMultiplicity_iff.mpr ⟨hp.ne_one, n.succ_pos⟩
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one] at h
rcases emultiplicity_eq_coe.mp h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity with ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, hpn⟩
conv_lhs => rw [hk, pow_mul, pow_mul]
rw [Nat.prime_iff_prime_int] at hp
rw [emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow_of_prime hp,
emultiplicity_pow_prime_pow_sub_pow_prime_pow hp hp1 hxy hx, h.emultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
· rw [← geom_sum₂_mul]
exact dvd_mul_of_dvd_right hxy _
· exact fun h => hx (hp.dvd_of_dvd_pow h)
· rw [Int.natCast_dvd_natCast]
rintro ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine hpn ⟨c, ?_⟩
rwa [pow_succ, mul_assoc]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Int.pow_sub_pow := Int.emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Multiplicity.lean | 225 | 236 | theorem Int.emultiplicity_pow_add_pow {x y : ℤ} (hxy : ↑p ∣ x + y) (hx : ¬↑p ∣ x)
{n : ℕ} (hn : Odd n) :
emultiplicity (↑p) (x ^ n + y ^ n) = emultiplicity (↑p) (x + y) + emultiplicity p n := by | rw [← sub_neg_eq_add] at hxy
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← sub_neg_eq_add, ← Odd.neg_pow hn]
exact Int.emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow hp hp1 hxy hx n
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity.Int.pow_add_pow := Int.emultiplicity_pow_add_pow
theorem Nat.emultiplicity_pow_sub_pow {x y : ℕ} (hxy : p ∣ x - y) (hx : ¬p ∣ x) (n : ℕ) :
emultiplicity p (x ^ n - y ^ n) = emultiplicity p (x - y) + emultiplicity p n := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Cyclotomic.Roots
import Mathlib.Tactic.ByContra
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Polynomial
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Padics.PadicVal.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Arg
/-!
# Evaluating cyclotomic polynomials
This file states some results about evaluating cyclotomic polynomials in various different ways.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.eval(₂)_one_cyclotomic_prime(_pow)`: `eval 1 (cyclotomic p^k R) = p`.
* `Polynomial.eval_one_cyclotomic_not_prime_pow`: Otherwise, `eval 1 (cyclotomic n R) = 1`.
* `Polynomial.cyclotomic_pos` : `∀ x, 0 < eval x (cyclotomic n R)` if `2 < n`.
-/
namespace Polynomial
open Finset Nat
@[simp]
theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} [hn : Fact p.Prime] :
eval 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by
simp only [cyclotomic_prime, eval_X, one_pow, Finset.sum_const, eval_pow, eval_finset_sum,
Finset.card_range, smul_one_eq_cast]
theorem eval₂_one_cyclotomic_prime {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [Semiring S] (f : R →+* S) {p : ℕ}
[Fact p.Prime] : eval₂ f 1 (cyclotomic p R) = p := by simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Polynomial/Cyclotomic/Eval.lean | 36 | 37 | theorem eval_one_cyclotomic_prime_pow {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {p : ℕ} (k : ℕ)
[hn : Fact p.Prime] : eval 1 (cyclotomic (p ^ (k + 1)) R) = p := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.GramSchmidtOrtho
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Orientation
/-!
# Orientations of real inner product spaces.
This file provides definitions and proves lemmas about orientations of real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `OrthonormalBasis.adjustToOrientation` takes an orthonormal basis and an orientation, and
returns an orthonormal basis with that orientation: either the original orthonormal basis, or one
constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis vector.
* `Orientation.finOrthonormalBasis` is an orthonormal basis, indexed by `Fin n`, with the given
orientation.
* `Orientation.volumeForm` is a nonvanishing top-dimensional alternating form on an oriented real
inner product space, uniquely defined by compatibility with the orientation and inner product
structure.
## Main theorems
* `Orientation.volumeForm_apply_le` states that the result of applying the volume form to a set of
`n` vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product space, is bounded by the product of the
lengths of the vectors.
* `Orientation.abs_volumeForm_apply_of_pairwise_orthogonal` states that the result of applying the
volume form to a set of `n` orthogonal vectors, where `n` is the dimension the inner product
space, is equal up to sign to the product of the lengths of the vectors.
-/
noncomputable section
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ E]
open Module
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace OrthonormalBasis
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (e f : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ E)
(x : Orientation ℝ E ι)
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the same orientation has
determinant 1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = 1 := by
apply (e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right
have : 0 < e.toBasis.det f := by
rw [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos] at h
simpa using h
linarith
/-- The change-of-basis matrix between two orthonormal bases with the opposite orientations has
determinant -1. -/
theorem det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation
(h : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ f.toBasis.orientation) : e.toBasis.det f = -1 := by
contrapose! h
simp [e.toBasis.orientation_eq_iff_det_pos,
(e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_real f).resolve_right h]
variable {e f}
/-- Two orthonormal bases with the same orientation determine the same "determinant" top-dimensional
form on `E`, and conversely. -/
theorem same_orientation_iff_det_eq_det :
e.toBasis.det = f.toBasis.det ↔ e.toBasis.orientation = f.toBasis.orientation := by
constructor
· intro h
dsimp [Basis.orientation]
congr
· intro h
rw [e.toBasis.det.eq_smul_basis_det f.toBasis]
simp [e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_same_orientation f h]
variable (e f)
/-- Two orthonormal bases with opposite orientations determine opposite "determinant"
top-dimensional forms on `E`. -/
theorem det_eq_neg_det_of_opposite_orientation (h : e.toBasis.orientation ≠ f.toBasis.orientation) :
e.toBasis.det = -f.toBasis.det := by
rw [e.toBasis.det.eq_smul_basis_det f.toBasis]
simp [e.det_to_matrix_orthonormalBasis_of_opposite_orientation f h, neg_one_smul]
variable [Nonempty ι]
section AdjustToOrientation
/-- `OrthonormalBasis.adjustToOrientation`, applied to an orthonormal basis, preserves the
property of orthonormality. -/
theorem orthonormal_adjustToOrientation : Orthonormal ℝ (e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x) := by
apply e.orthonormal.orthonormal_of_forall_eq_or_eq_neg
simpa using e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg x
/-- Given an orthonormal basis and an orientation, return an orthonormal basis giving that
orientation: either the original basis, or one constructed by negating a single (arbitrary) basis
vector. -/
def adjustToOrientation : OrthonormalBasis ι ℝ E :=
(e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x).toOrthonormalBasis (e.orthonormal_adjustToOrientation x)
theorem toBasis_adjustToOrientation :
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis = e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x :=
(e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis_toOrthonormalBasis _
/-- `adjustToOrientation` gives an orthonormal basis with the required orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem orientation_adjustToOrientation : (e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.orientation = x := by
rw [e.toBasis_adjustToOrientation]
exact e.toBasis.orientation_adjustToOrientation x
/-- Every basis vector from `adjustToOrientation` is either that from the original basis or its
negation. -/
theorem adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg (i : ι) :
e.adjustToOrientation x i = e i ∨ e.adjustToOrientation x i = -e i := by
simpa [← e.toBasis_adjustToOrientation] using
e.toBasis.adjustToOrientation_apply_eq_or_eq_neg x i
theorem det_adjustToOrientation :
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det = e.toBasis.det ∨
(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det = -e.toBasis.det := by
simpa using e.toBasis.det_adjustToOrientation x
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/Orientation.lean | 129 | 132 | theorem abs_det_adjustToOrientation (v : ι → E) :
|(e.adjustToOrientation x).toBasis.det v| = |e.toBasis.det v| := by | simp [toBasis_adjustToOrientation] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineEquiv
/-!
# Midpoint of a segment
## Main definitions
* `midpoint R x y`: midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. We define it for `x` and `y`
in a module over a ring `R` with invertible `2`.
* `AddMonoidHom.ofMapMidpoint`: construct an `AddMonoidHom` given a map `f` such that
`f` sends zero to zero and midpoints to midpoints.
## Main theorems
* `midpoint_eq_iff`: `z` is the midpoint of `[x, y]` if and only if `x + y = z + z`,
* `midpoint_unique`: `midpoint R x y` does not depend on `R`;
* `midpoint x y` is linear both in `x` and `y`;
* `pointReflection_midpoint_left`, `pointReflection_midpoint_right`:
`Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)` swaps `x` and `y`.
We do not mark most lemmas as `@[simp]` because it is hard to tell which side is simpler.
## Tags
midpoint, AddMonoidHom
-/
open AffineMap AffineEquiv
section
variable (R : Type*) {V V' P P' : Type*} [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] [AddCommGroup V]
[Module R V] [AddTorsor V P] [AddCommGroup V'] [Module R V'] [AddTorsor V' P']
/-- `midpoint x y` is the midpoint of the segment `[x, y]`. -/
def midpoint (x y : P) : P :=
lineMap x y (⅟ 2 : R)
variable {R} {x y z : P}
@[simp]
theorem AffineMap.map_midpoint (f : P →ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
@[simp]
theorem AffineEquiv.map_midpoint (f : P ≃ᵃ[R] P') (a b : P) :
f (midpoint R a b) = midpoint R (f a) (f b) :=
f.apply_lineMap a b _
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) x = y := by
rw [midpoint, pointReflection_apply, lineMap_apply, vadd_vsub, vadd_vadd, ← add_smul, ← two_mul,
mul_invOf_self, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
theorem midpoint_comm (x y : P) : midpoint R x y = midpoint R y x := by
rw [midpoint, ← lineMap_apply_one_sub, one_sub_invOf_two, midpoint]
theorem AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
pointReflection R (midpoint R x y) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
@[simp]
theorem Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_right (x y : P) :
(Equiv.pointReflection (midpoint R x y)) y = x := by
rw [midpoint_comm, Equiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left]
theorem midpoint_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₃ p₄ = midpoint R (p₁ -ᵥ p₃) (p₂ -ᵥ p₄) :=
lineMap_vsub_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
theorem midpoint_vadd_midpoint (v v' : V) (p p' : P) :
midpoint R v v' +ᵥ midpoint R p p' = midpoint R (v +ᵥ p) (v' +ᵥ p') :=
lineMap_vadd_lineMap _ _ _ _ _
theorem midpoint_eq_iff {x y z : P} : midpoint R x y = z ↔ pointReflection R z x = y :=
eq_comm.trans
((injective_pointReflection_left_of_module R x).eq_iff'
(AffineEquiv.pointReflection_midpoint_left x y)).symm
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_left (x y : P) :
midpoint R (Equiv.pointReflection x y) y = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 <| Equiv.pointReflection_involutive _ _
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_pointReflection_right (x y : P) :
midpoint R y (Equiv.pointReflection x y) = x :=
midpoint_eq_iff.2 rfl
nonrec lemma AffineEquiv.midpoint_pointReflection_left (x y : P) :
midpoint R (pointReflection R x y) y = x :=
midpoint_pointReflection_left x y
nonrec lemma AffineEquiv.midpoint_pointReflection_right (x y : P) :
midpoint R y (pointReflection R x y) = x :=
midpoint_pointReflection_right x y
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_left (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) :=
lineMap_vsub_left _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_vsub_right (p₁ p₂ : P) : midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_vsub_left]
@[simp]
theorem left_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₁ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂) :=
left_vsub_lineMap _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem right_vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ : P) : p₂ -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) := by
rw [midpoint_comm, left_vsub_midpoint]
theorem midpoint_vsub (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
midpoint R p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₁ -ᵥ p) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p₂ -ᵥ p) := by
rw [← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p p₂, smul_sub, sub_eq_add_neg, ← smul_neg,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, add_assoc, invOf_two_smul_add_invOf_two_smul, ← vadd_vsub_assoc,
midpoint_comm, midpoint, lineMap_apply]
theorem vsub_midpoint (p₁ p₂ p : P) :
p -ᵥ midpoint R p₁ p₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₁) + (⅟ 2 : R) • (p -ᵥ p₂) := by
rw [← neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev, midpoint_vsub, neg_add, ← smul_neg, ← smul_neg, neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev,
neg_vsub_eq_vsub_rev]
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_left (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₁ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
midpoint_vsub_left v₁ v₂
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_sub_right (v₁ v₂ : V) : midpoint R v₁ v₂ - v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
midpoint_vsub_right v₁ v₂
@[simp]
theorem left_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₁ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₁ - v₂) :=
left_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
@[simp]
theorem right_sub_midpoint (v₁ v₂ : V) : v₂ - midpoint R v₁ v₂ = (⅟ 2 : R) • (v₂ - v₁) :=
right_vsub_midpoint v₁ v₂
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_eq_left_iff {x y : P} : midpoint R x y = x ↔ x = y := by
rw [midpoint_eq_iff, pointReflection_self]
@[simp]
theorem left_eq_midpoint_iff {x y : P} : x = midpoint R x y ↔ x = y := by
rw [eq_comm, midpoint_eq_left_iff]
@[simp]
theorem midpoint_eq_right_iff {x y : P} : midpoint R x y = y ↔ x = y := by
rw [midpoint_comm, midpoint_eq_left_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Midpoint.lean | 169 | 170 | theorem right_eq_midpoint_iff {x y : P} : y = midpoint R x y ↔ x = y := by | rw [eq_comm, midpoint_eq_right_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.OrderIso
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Lemmas about linear ordered (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
section LinearOrderedSemifield
variable [Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d e : α} {m n : ℤ}
/-!
### Relating two divisions.
-/
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c ≤ b / c ↔ a ≤ b := div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_right (hc : 0 < c) : a / c < b / c ↔ a < b := div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_right hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-13")]
theorem div_lt_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b < a / c ↔ c < b :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_left (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) (hc : 0 < c) : a / b ≤ a / c ↔ c ≤ b :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left ha hb hc
@[deprecated div_lt_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d ↔ a * d < c * b :=
div_lt_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div_iff₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div_iff (b0 : 0 < b) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b ≤ c / d ↔ a * d ≤ c * b :=
div_le_div_iff₀ b0 d0
@[deprecated div_le_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_le_div (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hac : a ≤ c) (hd : 0 < d) (hbd : d ≤ b) : a / b ≤ c / d :=
div_le_div₀ hc hac hd hbd
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀ (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div (hac : a < c) (hbd : d ≤ b) (c0 : 0 ≤ c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀ hac hbd c0 d0
@[deprecated div_lt_div₀' (since := "2024-11-12")]
theorem div_lt_div' (hac : a ≤ c) (hbd : d < b) (c0 : 0 < c) (d0 : 0 < d) : a / b < c / d :=
div_lt_div₀' hac hbd c0 d0
/-!
### Relating one division and involving `1`
-/
@[bound]
theorem div_le_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb : 1 ≤ b) : a / b ≤ a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem div_lt_self (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 1 < b) : a / b < a := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_lt_div_of_pos_left ha zero_lt_one hb
@[bound]
theorem le_div_self (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hb₀ : 0 < b) (hb₁ : b ≤ 1) : a ≤ a / b := by
simpa only [div_one] using div_le_div_of_nonneg_left ha hb₀ hb₁
theorem one_le_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 ≤ a / b ↔ b ≤ a := by rw [le_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_le_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [div_le_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_lt_div (hb : 0 < b) : 1 < a / b ↔ b < a := by rw [lt_div_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem div_lt_one (hb : 0 < b) : a / b < 1 ↔ a < b := by rw [div_lt_iff₀ hb, one_mul]
theorem one_div_le (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ b ↔ 1 / b ≤ a := by
simpa using inv_le_comm₀ ha hb
theorem one_div_lt (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < b ↔ 1 / b < a := by
simpa using inv_lt_comm₀ ha hb
theorem le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using le_inv_comm₀ ha hb
theorem lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : a < 1 / b ↔ b < 1 / a := by
simpa using lt_inv_comm₀ ha hb
@[bound] lemma Bound.one_lt_div_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : b < a → 1 < a / b := (one_lt_div b0).mpr
@[bound] lemma Bound.div_lt_one_of_pos_of_lt (b0 : 0 < b) : a < b → a / b < 1 := (div_lt_one b0).mpr
/-!
### Relating two divisions, involving `1`
-/
theorem one_div_le_one_div_of_le (ha : 0 < a) (h : a ≤ b) : 1 / b ≤ 1 / a := by
simpa using inv_anti₀ ha h
theorem one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt (ha : 0 < a) (h : a < b) : 1 / b < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_div_iff₀' ha, ← div_eq_mul_one_div, div_lt_one (ha.trans h)]
theorem le_of_one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b) : b ≤ a :=
le_imp_le_of_lt_imp_lt (one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt ha) h
theorem lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (h : 1 / a < 1 / b) : b < a :=
lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le (one_div_le_one_div_of_le ha) h
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_le_one_div_of_le` and
`le_of_one_div_le_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_le_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a ≤ 1 / b ↔ b ≤ a :=
div_le_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
/-- For the single implications with fewer assumptions, see `one_div_lt_one_div_of_lt` and
`lt_of_one_div_lt_one_div` -/
theorem one_div_lt_one_div (ha : 0 < a) (hb : 0 < b) : 1 / a < 1 / b ↔ b < a :=
div_lt_div_iff_of_pos_left zero_lt_one ha hb
theorem one_lt_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a < 1) : 1 < 1 / a := by
rwa [lt_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
theorem one_le_one_div (h1 : 0 < a) (h2 : a ≤ 1) : 1 ≤ 1 / a := by
rwa [le_one_div (@zero_lt_one α _ _ _ _ _) h1, one_div_one]
/-!
### Results about halving.
The equalities also hold in semifields of characteristic `0`.
-/
theorem half_pos (h : 0 < a) : 0 < a / 2 :=
div_pos h zero_lt_two
theorem one_half_pos : (0 : α) < 1 / 2 :=
half_pos zero_lt_one
@[simp]
theorem half_le_self_iff : a / 2 ≤ a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rw [div_le_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
@[simp]
theorem half_lt_self_iff : a / 2 < a ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [div_lt_iff₀ (zero_lt_two' α), mul_two, lt_add_iff_pos_left]
alias ⟨_, half_le_self⟩ := half_le_self_iff
alias ⟨_, half_lt_self⟩ := half_lt_self_iff
alias div_two_lt_of_pos := half_lt_self
theorem one_half_lt_one : (1 / 2 : α) < 1 :=
half_lt_self zero_lt_one
theorem two_inv_lt_one : (2⁻¹ : α) < 1 :=
(one_div _).symm.trans_lt one_half_lt_one
theorem left_lt_add_div_two : a < (a + b) / 2 ↔ a < b := by simp [lt_div_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_div_two_lt_right : (a + b) / 2 < b ↔ a < b := by simp [div_lt_iff₀, mul_two]
theorem add_thirds (a : α) : a / 3 + a / 3 + a / 3 = a := by
rw [div_add_div_same, div_add_div_same, ← two_mul, ← add_one_mul 2 a, two_add_one_eq_three,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ a three_ne_zero]
/-!
### Miscellaneous lemmas
-/
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_left (ha : 0 < a) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < b := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_left ha, inv_pos]
@[simp] lemma div_pos_iff_of_pos_right (hb : 0 < b) : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_pos_iff_of_pos_right (inv_pos.2 hb)]
theorem mul_le_mul_of_mul_div_le (h : a * (b / c) ≤ d) (hc : 0 < c) : b * a ≤ d * c := by
rw [← mul_div_assoc] at h
rwa [mul_comm b, ← div_le_iff₀ hc]
theorem div_mul_le_div_mul_of_div_le_div (h : a / b ≤ c / d) (he : 0 ≤ e) :
a / (b * e) ≤ c / (d * e) := by
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right h (one_div_nonneg.2 he)
theorem exists_pos_mul_lt {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b * c < a := by
have : 0 < a / max (b + 1) 1 := div_pos h (lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inr zero_lt_one))
refine ⟨a / max (b + 1) 1, this, ?_⟩
rw [← lt_div_iff₀ this, div_div_cancel₀ h.ne']
exact lt_max_iff.2 (Or.inl <| lt_add_one _)
theorem exists_pos_lt_mul {a : α} (h : 0 < a) (b : α) : ∃ c : α, 0 < c ∧ b < c * a :=
let ⟨c, hc₀, hc⟩ := exists_pos_mul_lt h b;
⟨c⁻¹, inv_pos.2 hc₀, by rwa [← div_eq_inv_mul, lt_div_iff₀ hc₀]⟩
lemma monotone_div_right_of_nonneg (ha : 0 ≤ a) : Monotone (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_le_div_of_nonneg_right hbc ha
lemma strictMono_div_right_of_pos (ha : 0 < a) : StrictMono (· / a) :=
fun _b _c hbc ↦ div_lt_div_of_pos_right hbc ha
theorem Monotone.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 ≤ c) : Monotone fun x => f x / c := (monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).comp hf
theorem StrictMono.div_const {β : Type*} [Preorder β] {f : β → α} (hf : StrictMono f) {c : α}
(hc : 0 < c) : StrictMono fun x => f x / c := by
simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv] using hf.mul_const (inv_pos.2 hc)
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) LinearOrderedSemiField.toDenselyOrdered : DenselyOrdered α where
dense a₁ a₂ h :=
⟨(a₁ + a₂) / 2,
calc
a₁ = (a₁ + a₁) / 2 := (add_self_div_two a₁).symm
_ < (a₁ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_left h _) zero_lt_two
,
calc
(a₁ + a₂) / 2 < (a₂ + a₂) / 2 := div_lt_div_of_pos_right (add_lt_add_right h _) zero_lt_two
_ = a₂ := add_self_div_two a₂
⟩
theorem min_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : min (a / c) (b / c) = min a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_min.symm
theorem max_div_div_right {c : α} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (a b : α) : max (a / c) (b / c) = max a b / c :=
(monotone_div_right_of_nonneg hc).map_max.symm
theorem one_div_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => 1 / x) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ x1 _ y1 xy => (one_div_lt_one_div (Set.mem_Ioi.mp y1) (Set.mem_Ioi.mp x1)).mpr xy
theorem one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) :
1 / a ^ n ≤ 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_le_one_div ?_ ?_).mpr (pow_right_mono₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans_le a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) :
1 / a ^ n < 1 / a ^ m := by
refine (one_div_lt_one_div ?_ ?_).2 (pow_lt_pow_right₀ a1 mn) <;>
exact pow_pos (zero_lt_one.trans a1) _
theorem one_div_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1
theorem one_div_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => 1 / a ^ n := fun _ _ =>
one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1
theorem inv_strictAntiOn : StrictAntiOn (fun x : α => x⁻¹) (Set.Ioi 0) := fun _ hx _ hy xy =>
(inv_lt_inv₀ hy hx).2 xy
theorem inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le (a1 : 1 ≤ a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m ≤ n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ ≤ (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_le_one_div_pow_of_le a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt (a1 : 1 < a) {m n : ℕ} (mn : m < n) : (a ^ n)⁻¹ < (a ^ m)⁻¹ := by
convert one_div_pow_lt_one_div_pow_of_lt a1 mn using 1 <;> simp
theorem inv_pow_anti (a1 : 1 ≤ a) : Antitone fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_le_inv_pow_of_le a1
theorem inv_pow_strictAnti (a1 : 1 < a) : StrictAnti fun n : ℕ => (a ^ n)⁻¹ := fun _ _ =>
inv_pow_lt_inv_pow_of_lt a1
theorem le_iff_forall_one_lt_le_mul₀ {α : Type*}
[Semifield α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
{a b : α} (hb : 0 ≤ b) : a ≤ b ↔ ∀ ε, 1 < ε → a ≤ b * ε := by
refine ⟨fun h _ hε ↦ h.trans <| le_mul_of_one_le_right hb hε.le, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
obtain rfl|hb := hb.eq_or_lt
· simp_rw [zero_mul] at h
exact h 2 one_lt_two
refine le_of_forall_gt_imp_ge_of_dense fun x hbx => ?_
convert h (x / b) ((one_lt_div hb).mpr hbx)
rw [mul_div_cancel₀ _ hb.ne']
/-! ### Results about `IsGLB` -/
theorem IsGLB.mul_left {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => a * b) '' s) (a * b) := by
rcases lt_or_eq_of_le ha with (ha | rfl)
· exact (OrderIso.mulLeft₀ _ ha).isGLB_image'.2 hs
· simp_rw [zero_mul]
rw [hs.nonempty.image_const]
exact isGLB_singleton
theorem IsGLB.mul_right {s : Set α} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB ((fun b => b * a) '' s) (b * a) := by simpa [mul_comm] using hs.mul_left ha
end LinearOrderedSemifield
section
variable [Field α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] {a b c d : α} {n : ℤ}
/-! ### Lemmas about pos, nonneg, nonpos, neg -/
theorem div_pos_iff : 0 < a / b ↔ 0 < a ∧ 0 < b ∨ a < 0 ∧ b < 0 := by
simp only [division_def, mul_pos_iff, inv_pos, inv_lt_zero]
theorem div_neg_iff : a / b < 0 ↔ 0 < a ∧ b < 0 ∨ a < 0 ∧ 0 < b := by
simp [division_def, mul_neg_iff]
theorem div_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ a / b ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ 0 ≤ b ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ b ≤ 0 := by
simp [division_def, mul_nonneg_iff]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Field/Basic.lean | 315 | 316 | theorem div_nonpos_iff : a / b ≤ 0 ↔ 0 ≤ a ∧ b ≤ 0 ∨ a ≤ 0 ∧ 0 ≤ b := by | simp [division_def, mul_nonpos_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Prod
/-!
# Typeclasses for power-associative structures
In this file we define power-associativity for algebraic structures with a multiplication operation.
The class is a Prop-valued mixin named `NatPowAssoc`.
## Results
- `npow_add` a defining property: `x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n`
- `npow_one` a defining property: `x ^ 1 = x`
- `npow_assoc` strictly positive powers of an element have associative multiplication.
- `npow_comm` `x ^ m * x ^ n = x ^ n * x ^ m` for strictly positive `m` and `n`.
- `npow_mul` `x ^ (m * n) = (x ^ m) ^ n` for strictly positive `m` and `n`.
- `npow_eq_pow` monoid exponentiation coincides with semigroup exponentiation.
## Instances
We also produce the following instances:
- `NatPowAssoc` for Monoids, Pi types and products.
## TODO
* to_additive?
-/
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered
variable {M : Type*}
/-- A mixin for power-associative multiplication. -/
class NatPowAssoc (M : Type*) [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] : Prop where
/-- Multiplication is power-associative. -/
protected npow_add : ∀ (k n : ℕ) (x : M), x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n
/-- Exponent zero is one. -/
protected npow_zero : ∀ (x : M), x ^ 0 = 1
/-- Exponent one is identity. -/
protected npow_one : ∀ (x : M), x ^ 1 = x
section MulOneClass
variable [MulOneClass M] [Pow M ℕ] [NatPowAssoc M]
theorem npow_add (k n : ℕ) (x : M) : x ^ (k + n) = x ^ k * x ^ n :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_add k n x
@[simp]
theorem npow_zero (x : M) : x ^ 0 = 1 :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_zero x
@[simp]
theorem npow_one (x : M) : x ^ 1 = x :=
NatPowAssoc.npow_one x
theorem npow_mul_assoc (k m n : ℕ) (x : M) :
(x ^ k * x ^ m) * x ^ n = x ^ k * (x ^ m * x ^ n) := by
simp only [← npow_add, add_assoc]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/NatPowAssoc.lean | 69 | 70 | theorem npow_mul_comm (m n : ℕ) (x : M) :
x ^ m * x ^ n = x ^ n * x ^ m := by | simp only [← npow_add, add_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.HausdorffDistance
/-!
# Thickenings in pseudo-metric spaces
## Main definitions
* `Metric.thickening δ s`, the open thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric space.
* `Metric.cthickening δ s`, the closed thickening by radius `δ` of a set `s` in a pseudo emetric
space.
## Main results
* `Disjoint.exists_thickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint thickenings
* `Disjoint.exists_cthickenings`: two disjoint sets admit disjoint closed thickenings
* `IsCompact.exists_cthickening_subset_open`: if `s` is compact, `t` is open and `s ⊆ t`,
some `cthickening` of `s` is contained in `t`.
* `Metric.hasBasis_nhdsSet_cthickening`: the `cthickening`s of a compact set `K` form a basis
of the neighbourhoods of `K`
* `Metric.closure_eq_iInter_cthickening'`: the closure of a set equals the intersection
of its closed thickenings of positive radii accumulating at zero.
The same holds for open thickenings.
* `IsCompact.cthickening_eq_biUnion_closedBall`: if `s` is compact, `cthickening δ s` is the union
of `closedBall`s of radius `δ` around `x : E`.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal Topology Set Filter Bornology
universe u v w
variable {ι : Sort*} {α : Type u}
namespace Metric
section Thickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
def thickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E < ENNReal.ofReal δ }
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infEdist_lt : x ∈ thickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
(open) `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_thickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.thickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [thickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
exact (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hδ.le).trans ε_lt.le
/-- The (open) thickening equals the preimage of an open interval under `EMetric.infEdist`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ E = (infEdist · E) ⁻¹' Iio (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The (open) thickening is an open set. -/
theorem isOpen_thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsOpen (thickening δ E) :=
Continuous.isOpen_preimage continuous_infEdist _ isOpen_Iio
/-- The (open) thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem thickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : thickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [thickening, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, not_top_lt]
theorem thickening_of_nonpos (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (s : Set α) : thickening δ s = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem fun _ => ((ENNReal.ofReal_of_nonpos hδ).trans_le bot_le).not_lt
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a fixed subset `E` is an increasing function of
the thickening radius `δ`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem thickening_mono {δ₁ δ₂ : ℝ} (hle : δ₁ ≤ δ₂) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ₁ E ⊆ thickening δ₂ E :=
preimage_mono (Iio_subset_Iio (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal hle))
/-- The (open) thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` with a fixed thickening radius `δ` is
an increasing function of the subset `E`. -/
theorem thickening_subset_of_subset (δ : ℝ) {E₁ E₂ : Set α} (h : E₁ ⊆ E₂) :
thickening δ E₁ ⊆ thickening δ E₂ := fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (infEdist_anti h) hx
theorem mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt {δ : ℝ} (E : Set α) (x : α) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
infEdist_lt_iff
/-- The frontier of the (open) thickening of a set is contained in an `EMetric.infEdist` level
set. -/
theorem frontier_thickening_subset (E : Set α) {δ : ℝ} :
frontier (thickening δ E) ⊆ { x : α | infEdist x E = ENNReal.ofReal δ } :=
frontier_lt_subset_eq continuous_infEdist continuous_const
open scoped Function in -- required for scoped `on` notation
theorem frontier_thickening_disjoint (A : Set α) :
Pairwise (Disjoint on fun r : ℝ => frontier (thickening r A)) := by
refine (pairwise_disjoint_on _).2 fun r₁ r₂ hr => ?_
rcases le_total r₁ 0 with h₁ | h₁
· simp [thickening_of_nonpos h₁]
refine ((disjoint_singleton.2 fun h => hr.ne ?_).preimage _).mono (frontier_thickening_subset _)
(frontier_thickening_subset _)
apply_fun ENNReal.toReal at h
rwa [ENNReal.toReal_ofReal h₁, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (h₁.trans hr.le)] at h
/-- Any set is contained in the complement of the δ-thickening of the complement of its
δ-thickening. -/
lemma subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
E ⊆ (thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
intro x x_in_E
simp only [thickening, mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt]
apply EMetric.le_infEdist.mpr fun y hy ↦ ?_
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at hy
simpa only [edist_comm] using le_trans hy <| EMetric.infEdist_le_edist_of_mem x_in_E
/-- The δ-thickening of the complement of the δ-thickening of a set is contained in the complement
of the set. -/
lemma thickening_compl_thickening_self_subset_compl (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
thickening δ (thickening δ E)ᶜ ⊆ Eᶜ := by
apply compl_subset_compl.mp
simpa only [compl_compl] using subset_compl_thickening_compl_thickening_self δ E
variable {X : Type u} [PseudoMetricSpace X]
theorem mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt {E : Set X} {x : X} (h : E.Nonempty) :
x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ infDist x E < δ :=
lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (infEdist_ne_top h)
/-- A point in a metric space belongs to the (open) `δ`-thickening of a subset `E` if and only if
it is at distance less than `δ` from some point of `E`. -/
theorem mem_thickening_iff {E : Set X} {x : X} : x ∈ thickening δ E ↔ ∃ z ∈ E, dist x z < δ := by
have key_iff : ∀ z : X, edist x z < ENNReal.ofReal δ ↔ dist x z < δ := fun z ↦ by
rw [dist_edist, lt_ofReal_iff_toReal_lt (edist_ne_top _ _)]
simp_rw [mem_thickening_iff_exists_edist_lt, key_iff]
@[simp]
theorem thickening_singleton (δ : ℝ) (x : X) : thickening δ ({x} : Set X) = ball x δ := by
ext
simp [mem_thickening_iff]
theorem ball_subset_thickening {x : X} {E : Set X} (hx : x ∈ E) (δ : ℝ) :
ball x δ ⊆ thickening δ E :=
Subset.trans (by simp [Subset.rfl]) (thickening_subset_of_subset δ <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr hx)
/-- The (open) `δ`-thickening `Metric.thickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a metric space equals the
union of balls of radius `δ` centered at points of `E`. -/
theorem thickening_eq_biUnion_ball {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} : thickening δ E = ⋃ x ∈ E, ball x δ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_iUnion₂, exists_prop]
exact mem_thickening_iff
protected theorem _root_.Bornology.IsBounded.thickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set X} (h : IsBounded E) :
IsBounded (thickening δ E) := by
rcases E.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | ⟨x, hx⟩
· simp
· refine (isBounded_iff_subset_closedBall x).2 ⟨δ + diam E, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
calc
dist y x ≤ infDist y E + diam E := dist_le_infDist_add_diam (x := y) h hx
_ ≤ δ + diam E := add_le_add_right ((mem_thickening_iff_infDist_lt ⟨x, hx⟩).1 hy).le _
end Thickening
section Cthickening
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] {δ ε : ℝ} {s t : Set α} {x : α}
open EMetric
/-- The closed `δ`-thickening `Metric.cthickening δ E` of a subset `E` in a pseudo emetric space
consists of those points that are at infimum distance at most `δ` from `E`. -/
def cthickening (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) : Set α :=
{ x : α | infEdist x E ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ }
@[simp]
theorem mem_cthickening_iff : x ∈ cthickening δ s ↔ infEdist x s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ :=
Iff.rfl
/-- An exterior point of a subset `E` (i.e., a point outside the closure of `E`) is not in the
closed `δ`-thickening of `E` for small enough positive `δ`. -/
lemma eventually_not_mem_cthickening_of_infEdist_pos {E : Set α} {x : α} (h : x ∉ closure E) :
∀ᶠ δ in 𝓝 (0 : ℝ), x ∉ Metric.cthickening δ E := by
obtain ⟨ε, ⟨ε_pos, ε_lt⟩⟩ := exists_real_pos_lt_infEdist_of_not_mem_closure h
filter_upwards [eventually_lt_nhds ε_pos] with δ hδ
simp only [cthickening, mem_setOf_eq, not_le]
exact ((ofReal_lt_ofReal_iff ε_pos).mpr hδ).trans ε_lt
theorem mem_cthickening_of_edist_le (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) (h : y ∈ E)
(h' : edist x y ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E :=
(infEdist_le_edist_of_mem h).trans h'
theorem mem_cthickening_of_dist_le {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] (x y : α) (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α)
(h : y ∈ E) (h' : dist x y ≤ δ) : x ∈ cthickening δ E := by
apply mem_cthickening_of_edist_le x y δ E h
rw [edist_dist]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal h'
theorem cthickening_eq_preimage_infEdist (δ : ℝ) (E : Set α) :
cthickening δ E = (fun x => infEdist x E) ⁻¹' Iic (ENNReal.ofReal δ) :=
rfl
/-- The closed thickening is a closed set. -/
theorem isClosed_cthickening {δ : ℝ} {E : Set α} : IsClosed (cthickening δ E) :=
IsClosed.preimage continuous_infEdist isClosed_Iic
/-- The closed thickening of the empty set is empty. -/
@[simp]
theorem cthickening_empty (δ : ℝ) : cthickening δ (∅ : Set α) = ∅ := by
simp only [cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top, setOf_false, infEdist_empty, top_le_iff]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Thickening.lean | 218 | 222 | theorem cthickening_of_nonpos {δ : ℝ} (hδ : δ ≤ 0) (E : Set α) : cthickening δ E = closure E := by | ext x
simp [mem_closure_iff_infEdist_zero, cthickening, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 hδ]
/-- The closed thickening with radius zero is the closure of the set. -/ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 316 | 332 | theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by | apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.CharZero
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity.Core
/-!
# Casts of rational numbers into linear ordered fields.
-/
variable {F ι α β : Type*}
namespace Rat
variable {p q : ℚ}
@[simp]
theorem castHom_rat : castHom ℚ = RingHom.id ℚ :=
RingHom.ext cast_id
section LinearOrderedField
variable {K : Type*} [Field K] [LinearOrder K] [IsStrictOrderedRing K]
theorem cast_pos_of_pos (hq : 0 < q) : (0 : K) < q := by
rw [Rat.cast_def]
exact div_pos (Int.cast_pos.2 <| num_pos.2 hq) (Nat.cast_pos.2 q.pos)
@[mono]
theorem cast_strictMono : StrictMono ((↑) : ℚ → K) := fun p q => by
simpa only [sub_pos, cast_sub] using cast_pos_of_pos (K := K) (q := q - p)
@[mono]
theorem cast_mono : Monotone ((↑) : ℚ → K) :=
cast_strictMono.monotone
/-- Coercion from `ℚ` as an order embedding. -/
@[simps!]
def castOrderEmbedding : ℚ ↪o K :=
OrderEmbedding.ofStrictMono (↑) cast_strictMono
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_le : (p : K) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q := castOrderEmbedding.le_iff_le
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma cast_lt : (p : K) < q ↔ p < q := cast_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_le_ratCast⟩ := cast_le
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.ratCast_lt_ratCast⟩ := cast_lt
@[simp] lemma cast_nonneg : 0 ≤ (q : K) ↔ 0 ≤ q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_nonpos : (q : K) ≤ 0 ↔ q ≤ 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_pos : (0 : K) < q ↔ 0 < q := by norm_cast
@[simp] lemma cast_lt_zero : (q : K) < 0 ↔ q < 0 := by norm_cast
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_le_natCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℕ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_le_cast {m : ℕ} {n : ℚ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ (m : ℚ) ≤ n := by
rw [← cast_le (K := K), cast_natCast]
@[simp, norm_cast]
| Mathlib/Data/Rat/Cast/Order.lean | 68 | 68 | theorem cast_le_intCast {m : ℚ} {n : ℤ} : (m : K) ≤ n ↔ m ≤ (n : ℚ) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Units
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Bracket
/-!
# Semirings and rings
This file gives lemmas about semirings, rings and domains.
This is analogous to `Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic`,
the difference being that the former is about `+` and `*` separately, while
the present file is about their interaction.
For the definitions of semirings and rings see `Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs`.
-/
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
open Function
namespace Commute
@[simp]
theorem add_right [Distrib R] {a b c : R} : Commute a b → Commute a c → Commute a (b + c) :=
SemiconjBy.add_right
-- for some reason mathport expected `Semiring` instead of `Distrib`?
@[simp]
theorem add_left [Distrib R] {a b c : R} : Commute a c → Commute b c → Commute (a + b) c :=
SemiconjBy.add_left
-- for some reason mathport expected `Semiring` instead of `Distrib`?
/-- Representation of a difference of two squares of commuting elements as a product. -/
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b : R} (h : Commute a b) :
a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) := by
rw [add_mul, mul_sub, mul_sub, h.eq, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq' [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b : R} (h : Commute a b) :
a * a - b * b = (a - b) * (a + b) := by
rw [mul_add, sub_mul, sub_mul, h.eq, sub_add_sub_cancel]
theorem mul_self_eq_mul_self_iff [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] [NoZeroDivisors R] {a b : R}
(h : Commute a b) : a * a = b * b ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, h.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq, mul_eq_zero, or_comm, sub_eq_zero,
add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg]
section
variable [Mul R] [HasDistribNeg R] {a b : R}
theorem neg_right : Commute a b → Commute a (-b) :=
SemiconjBy.neg_right
@[simp]
theorem neg_right_iff : Commute a (-b) ↔ Commute a b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_right_iff
theorem neg_left : Commute a b → Commute (-a) b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_left
@[simp]
theorem neg_left_iff : Commute (-a) b ↔ Commute a b :=
SemiconjBy.neg_left_iff
end
section
variable [MulOneClass R] [HasDistribNeg R]
theorem neg_one_right (a : R) : Commute a (-1) :=
SemiconjBy.neg_one_right a
theorem neg_one_left (a : R) : Commute (-1) a :=
SemiconjBy.neg_one_left a
end
section
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocRing R] {a b c : R}
@[simp]
theorem sub_right : Commute a b → Commute a c → Commute a (b - c) :=
SemiconjBy.sub_right
@[simp]
theorem sub_left : Commute a c → Commute b c → Commute (a - b) c :=
SemiconjBy.sub_left
end
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {a b : R}
protected lemma sq_sub_sq (h : Commute a b) : a ^ 2 - b ^ 2 = (a + b) * (a - b) := by
rw [sq, sq, h.mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
protected lemma sq_eq_sq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg (h : Commute a b) : a ^ 2 = b ^ 2 ↔ a = b ∨ a = -b := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero, h.sq_sub_sq, mul_eq_zero, add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, sub_eq_zero, or_comm]
end Ring
end Commute
section HasDistribNeg
variable (R)
variable [Monoid R] [HasDistribNeg R]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_or : ∀ n : ℕ, (-1 : R) ^ n = 1 ∨ (-1 : R) ^ n = -1
| 0 => Or.inl (pow_zero _)
| n + 1 => (neg_one_pow_eq_or n).symm.imp
(fun h ↦ by rw [pow_succ, h, neg_one_mul, neg_neg])
(fun h ↦ by rw [pow_succ, h, one_mul])
variable {R}
lemma neg_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (-a) ^ n = (-1) ^ n * a ^ n :=
neg_one_mul a ▸ (Commute.neg_one_left a).mul_pow n
lemma neg_pow' (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (-a) ^ n = a ^ n * (-1) ^ n :=
mul_neg_one a ▸ (Commute.neg_one_right a).mul_pow n
lemma neg_sq (a : R) : (-a) ^ 2 = a ^ 2 := by simp [sq]
lemma neg_one_sq : (-1 : R) ^ 2 = 1 := by simp [neg_sq, one_pow]
alias neg_pow_two := neg_sq
alias neg_one_pow_two := neg_one_sq
end HasDistribNeg
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {a : R} {n : ℕ}
@[simp] lemma neg_one_pow_mul_eq_zero_iff : (-1) ^ n * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rcases neg_one_pow_eq_or R n with h | h <;> simp [h]
@[simp] lemma mul_neg_one_pow_eq_zero_iff : a * (-1) ^ n = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
obtain h | h := neg_one_pow_eq_or R n <;> simp [h]
lemma neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two (n : ℕ) : (-1 : R) ^ n = (-1) ^ (n % 2) := by
rw [← Nat.mod_add_div n 2, pow_add, pow_mul]; simp [sq]
variable [NoZeroDivisors R]
@[simp] lemma sq_eq_one_iff : a ^ 2 = 1 ↔ a = 1 ∨ a = -1 := by
rw [← (Commute.one_right a).sq_eq_sq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, one_pow]
lemma sq_ne_one_iff : a ^ 2 ≠ 1 ↔ a ≠ 1 ∧ a ≠ -1 := sq_eq_one_iff.not.trans not_or
end Ring
/-- Representation of a difference of two squares in a commutative ring as a product. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Commute.lean | 166 | 170 | theorem mul_self_sub_mul_self [NonUnitalNonAssocCommRing R] (a b : R) :
a * a - b * b = (a + b) * (a - b) :=
(Commute.all a b).mul_self_sub_mul_self_eq
theorem mul_self_sub_one [NonAssocRing R] (a : R) : a * a - 1 = (a + 1) * (a - 1) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Function
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Unbundled.ExistsOfLE
/-!
# Images of intervals under `(+ d)`
The lemmas in this file state that addition maps intervals bijectively. The typeclass
`ExistsAddOfLE` is defined specifically to make them work when combined with
`OrderedCancelAddCommMonoid`; the lemmas below therefore apply to all
`OrderedAddCommGroup`, but also to `ℕ` and `ℝ≥0`, which are not groups.
-/
namespace Set
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid M]
[ExistsAddOfLE M] (a b c d : M)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Interval/Set/Monoid.lean | 27 | 32 | theorem Ici_add_bij : BijOn (· + d) (Ici a) (Ici (a + d)) := by | refine
⟨fun x h => add_le_add_right (mem_Ici.mp h) _, (add_left_injective d).injOn, fun _ h => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le (mem_Ici.mp h)
rw [mem_Ici, add_right_comm, add_le_add_iff_right] at h
exact ⟨a + c, h, by rw [add_right_comm]⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Jeremy Tan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Tan
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Interval
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Count
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Floor
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Counting elements in an interval with given residue
The theorems in this file generalise `Nat.card_multiples` in `Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factorization.Basic`
to all integer intervals and any fixed residue (not just zero, which reduces to the multiples).
Theorems are given for `Ico` and `Ioc` intervals.
-/
open Finset Int
namespace Int
variable (a b : ℤ) {r : ℤ}
lemma Ico_filter_modEq_eq (v : ℤ) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≡ v [ZMOD r]} =
{x ∈ Ico (a - v) (b - v) | r ∣ x}.map ⟨(· + v), add_left_injective v⟩ := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_filter, mem_Ico, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
exists_eq_right, modEq_comm, modEq_iff_dvd, sub_lt_sub_iff_right, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
lemma Ioc_filter_modEq_eq (v : ℤ) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x ≡ v [ZMOD r]} =
{x ∈ Ioc (a - v) (b - v) | r ∣ x}.map ⟨(· + v), add_left_injective v⟩ := by
ext x
simp_rw [mem_map, mem_filter, mem_Ioc, Function.Embedding.coeFn_mk, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq,
exists_eq_right, modEq_comm, modEq_iff_dvd, sub_lt_sub_iff_right, sub_le_sub_iff_right]
variable (hr : 0 < r)
include hr
lemma Ico_filter_dvd_eq :
{x ∈ Ico a b | r ∣ x} =
(Ico ⌈a / (r : ℚ)⌉ ⌈b / (r : ℚ)⌉).map ⟨(· * r), mul_left_injective₀ hr.ne'⟩ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_map, mem_filter, mem_Ico, ceil_le, lt_ceil, div_le_iff₀, lt_div_iff₀,
dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, cast_pos.2 hr, ← cast_mul, cast_lt, cast_le]
aesop
lemma Ioc_filter_dvd_eq :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | r ∣ x} =
(Ioc ⌊a / (r : ℚ)⌋ ⌊b / (r : ℚ)⌋).map ⟨(· * r), mul_left_injective₀ hr.ne'⟩ := by
ext x
simp only [mem_map, mem_filter, mem_Ioc, floor_lt, le_floor, div_lt_iff₀, le_div_iff₀,
dvd_iff_exists_eq_mul_left, cast_pos.2 hr, ← cast_mul, cast_lt, cast_le]
aesop
/-- There are `⌈b / r⌉ - ⌈a / r⌉` multiples of `r` in `[a, b)`, if `a ≤ b`. -/
theorem Ico_filter_dvd_card : #{x ∈ Ico a b | r ∣ x} = max (⌈b / (r : ℚ)⌉ - ⌈a / (r : ℚ)⌉) 0 := by
rw [Ico_filter_dvd_eq _ _ hr, card_map, card_Ico, toNat_eq_max]
/-- There are `⌊b / r⌋ - ⌊a / r⌋` multiples of `r` in `(a, b]`, if `a ≤ b`. -/
theorem Ioc_filter_dvd_card : #{x ∈ Ioc a b | r ∣ x} = max (⌊b / (r : ℚ)⌋ - ⌊a / (r : ℚ)⌋) 0 := by
rw [Ioc_filter_dvd_eq _ _ hr, card_map, card_Ioc, toNat_eq_max]
/-- There are `⌈(b - v) / r⌉ - ⌈(a - v) / r⌉` numbers congruent to `v` mod `r` in `[a, b)`,
if `a ≤ b`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Int/CardIntervalMod.lean | 71 | 73 | theorem Ico_filter_modEq_card (v : ℤ) :
#{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≡ v [ZMOD r]} = max (⌈(b - v) / (r : ℚ)⌉ - ⌈(a - v) / (r : ℚ)⌉) 0 := by | simp [Ico_filter_modEq_eq, Ico_filter_dvd_eq, toNat_eq_max, hr] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Quaternion
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Basis on a quaternion-like algebra
## Main definitions
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃`: a basis for a subspace of an `R`-algebra `A` that has the
same algebra structure as `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.self R`: the canonical basis for `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.compHom b f`: transform a basis `b` by an AlgHom `f`.
* `QuaternionAlgebra.lift`: Define an `AlgHom` out of `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` by its action on the basis
elements `i`, `j`, and `k`. In essence, this is a universal property. Analogous to `Complex.lift`,
but takes a bundled `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis` instead of just a `Subtype` as the amount of
data / proves is non-negligible.
-/
open Quaternion
namespace QuaternionAlgebra
/-- A quaternion basis contains the information both sufficient and necessary to construct an
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to `A`; or equivalently, a surjective
`R`-algebra homomorphism from `ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]` to an `R`-subalgebra of `A`.
Note that for definitional convenience, `k` is provided as a field even though `i_mul_j` fully
determines it. -/
structure Basis {R : Type*} (A : Type*) [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Algebra R A] (c₁ c₂ c₃ : R) where
/-- The first imaginary unit -/
i : A
/-- The second imaginary unit -/
j : A
/-- The third imaginary unit -/
k : A
i_mul_i : i * i = c₁ • (1 : A) + c₂ • i
j_mul_j : j * j = c₃ • (1 : A)
i_mul_j : i * j = k
j_mul_i : j * i = c₂ • j - k
variable {R : Type*} {A B : Type*} [CommRing R] [Ring A] [Ring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable {c₁ c₂ c₃ : R}
namespace Basis
/-- Since `k` is redundant, it is not necessary to show `q₁.k = q₂.k` when showing `q₁ = q₂`. -/
@[ext]
protected theorem ext ⦃q₁ q₂ : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃⦄ (hi : q₁.i = q₂.i)
(hj : q₁.j = q₂.j) : q₁ = q₂ := by
cases q₁; rename_i q₁_i_mul_j _
cases q₂; rename_i q₂_i_mul_j _
congr
rw [← q₁_i_mul_j, ← q₂_i_mul_j]
congr
variable (R) in
/-- There is a natural quaternionic basis for the `QuaternionAlgebra`. -/
@[simps i j k]
protected def self : Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃ where
i := ⟨0, 1, 0, 0⟩
i_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
j := ⟨0, 0, 1, 0⟩
j_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
k := ⟨0, 0, 0, 1⟩
i_mul_j := by ext <;> simp
j_mul_i := by ext <;> simp
instance : Inhabited (Basis ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃] c₁ c₂ c₃) :=
⟨Basis.self R⟩
variable (q : Basis A c₁ c₂ c₃)
attribute [simp] i_mul_i j_mul_j i_mul_j j_mul_i
@[simp]
theorem i_mul_k : q.i * q.k = c₁ • q.j + c₂ • q.k := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, i_mul_i, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul, smul_mul_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_i : q.k * q.i = -c₁ • q.j := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, j_mul_i, mul_sub, i_mul_k, neg_smul, mul_smul_comm, i_mul_j]
linear_combination (norm := module)
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_j : q.k * q.j = c₃ • q.i := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, j_mul_j, mul_smul_comm, mul_one]
@[simp]
theorem j_mul_k : q.j * q.k = (c₂ * c₃) • 1 - c₃ • q.i := by
rw [← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, j_mul_i, sub_mul, smul_mul_assoc, j_mul_j, ← smul_assoc, k_mul_j]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem k_mul_k : q.k * q.k = -((c₁ * c₃) • (1 : A)) := by
rw [← i_mul_j, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc q.j _ _, j_mul_i, ← i_mul_j, ← mul_assoc, mul_sub, ←
mul_assoc, i_mul_i, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, one_mul, sub_mul, smul_mul_assoc, mul_smul_comm,
smul_mul_assoc, mul_assoc, j_mul_j, add_mul, smul_mul_assoc, j_mul_j, smul_smul,
smul_mul_assoc, mul_assoc, j_mul_j]
linear_combination (norm := module)
/-- Intermediate result used to define `QuaternionAlgebra.Basis.liftHom`. -/
def lift (x : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : A :=
algebraMap R _ x.re + x.imI • q.i + x.imJ • q.j + x.imK • q.k
theorem lift_zero : q.lift (0 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 0 := by simp [lift]
theorem lift_one : q.lift (1 : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) = 1 := by simp [lift]
theorem lift_add (x y : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : q.lift (x + y) = q.lift x + q.lift y := by
simp only [lift, add_re, map_add, add_imI, add_smul, add_imJ, add_imK]
abel
| Mathlib/Algebra/QuaternionBasis.lean | 120 | 122 | theorem lift_mul (x y : ℍ[R,c₁,c₂,c₃]) : q.lift (x * y) = q.lift x * q.lift y := by | simp only [lift, Algebra.algebraMap_eq_smul_one]
simp_rw [add_mul, mul_add, smul_mul_assoc, mul_smul_comm, one_mul, mul_one, smul_smul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.Ergodic.MeasurePreserving
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Diagonal
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.Transvection
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.LIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Marginal
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Stieltjes
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# Lebesgue measure on the real line and on `ℝⁿ`
We show that the Lebesgue measure on the real line (constructed as a particular case of additive
Haar measure on inner product spaces) coincides with the Stieltjes measure associated
to the function `x ↦ x`. We deduce properties of this measure on `ℝ`, and then of the product
Lebesgue measure on `ℝⁿ`. In particular, we prove that they are translation invariant.
We show that, on `ℝⁿ`, a linear map acts on Lebesgue measure by rescaling it through the absolute
value of its determinant, in `Real.map_linearMap_volume_pi_eq_smul_volume_pi`.
More properties of the Lebesgue measure are deduced from this in
`Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/EqHaar.lean`, where they are proved more generally for any
additive Haar measure on a finite-dimensional real vector space.
-/
assert_not_exists MeasureTheory.integral
noncomputable section
open Set Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open ENNReal (ofReal)
open scoped ENNReal NNReal Topology
/-!
### Definition of the Lebesgue measure and lengths of intervals
-/
namespace Real
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
/-- The volume on the real line (as a particular case of the volume on a finite-dimensional
inner product space) coincides with the Stieltjes measure coming from the identity function. -/
theorem volume_eq_stieltjes_id : (volume : Measure ℝ) = StieltjesFunction.id.measure := by
haveI : IsAddLeftInvariant StieltjesFunction.id.measure :=
⟨fun a =>
Eq.symm <|
Real.measure_ext_Ioo_rat fun p q => by
simp only [Measure.map_apply (measurable_const_add a) measurableSet_Ioo,
sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, StieltjesFunction.measure_Ioo, StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim,
StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, preimage_const_add_Ioo]⟩
have A : StieltjesFunction.id.measure (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped = 1 := by
change StieltjesFunction.id.measure (parallelepiped (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ)) = 1
rcases parallelepiped_orthonormalBasis_one_dim (stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ) with (H | H) <;>
simp only [H, StieltjesFunction.measure_Icc, StieltjesFunction.id_apply, id, tsub_zero,
StieltjesFunction.id_leftLim, sub_neg_eq_add, zero_add, ENNReal.ofReal_one]
conv_rhs =>
rw [addHaarMeasure_unique StieltjesFunction.id.measure
(stdOrthonormalBasis ℝ ℝ).toBasis.parallelepiped, A]
simp only [volume, Basis.addHaar, one_smul]
theorem volume_val (s) : volume s = StieltjesFunction.id.measure s := by
simp [volume_eq_stieltjes_id]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ico a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ico {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ico a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ico_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ico a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Icc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Icc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Icc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Icc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Icc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioo a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioo a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioo_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioo a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
@[simp]
theorem volume_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume (Ioc a b) = ofReal (b - a) := by simp [volume_val]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_Ioc {a b : ℝ} : volume.real (Ioc a b) = max (b - a) 0 := by
simp [measureReal_def, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal']
theorem volume_real_Ioc_of_le {a b : ℝ} (hab : a ≤ b) : volume.real (Ioc a b) = b - a := by
simp [hab]
theorem volume_singleton {a : ℝ} : volume ({a} : Set ℝ) = 0 := by simp [volume_val]
theorem volume_univ : volume (univ : Set ℝ) = ∞ :=
ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r =>
calc
(r : ℝ≥0∞) = volume (Icc (0 : ℝ) r) := by simp
_ ≤ volume univ := measure_mono (subset_univ _)
@[simp]
theorem volume_ball (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.ball a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [ball_eq_Ioo, volume_Ioo, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_ball {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : volume.real (Metric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
theorem volume_closedBall (a r : ℝ) : volume (Metric.closedBall a r) = ofReal (2 * r) := by
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, volume_Icc, ← sub_add, add_sub_cancel_left, two_mul]
@[simp]
theorem volume_real_closedBall {a r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
volume.real (Metric.closedBall a r) = 2 * r := by
simp [measureReal_def, hr]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Lebesgue/Basic.lean | 140 | 141 | theorem volume_emetric_ball (a : ℝ) (r : ℝ≥0∞) : volume (EMetric.ball a r) = 2 * r := by | rcases eq_or_ne r ∞ with (rfl | hr) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 245 | 252 | theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by | simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRight
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Hausdorff
/-!
# Order-closed topologies
In this file we introduce 3 typeclass mixins that relate topology and order structures:
- `ClosedIicTopology` says that all the intervals $(-∞, a]$ (formally, `Set.Iic a`)
are closed sets;
- `ClosedIciTopology` says that all the intervals $[a, +∞)$ (formally, `Set.Ici a`)
are closed sets;
- `OrderClosedTopology` says that the set of points `(x, y)` such that `x ≤ y`
is closed in the product topology.
The last predicate implies the first two.
We prove many basic properties of such topologies.
## Main statements
This file contains the proofs of the following facts.
For exact requirements
(`OrderClosedTopology` vs `ClosedIciTopology` vs `ClosedIicTopology,
`Preorder` vs `PartialOrder` vs `LinearOrder` etc)
see their statements.
### Open / closed sets
* `isOpen_lt` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x < g x}` is open;
* `isOpen_Iio`, `isOpen_Ioi`, `isOpen_Ioo` : open intervals are open;
* `isClosed_le` : if `f` and `g` are continuous functions, then `{x | f x ≤ g x}` is closed;
* `isClosed_Iic`, `isClosed_Ici`, `isClosed_Icc` : closed intervals are closed;
* `frontier_le_subset_eq`, `frontier_lt_subset_eq` : frontiers of both `{x | f x ≤ g x}`
and `{x | f x < g x}` are included by `{x | f x = g x}`;
### Convergence and inequalities
* `le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a`, `g` converges to `b`, and eventually
`f x ≤ g x`, then `a ≤ b`
* `le_of_tendsto`, `ge_of_tendsto` : if `f` converges to `a` and eventually `f x ≤ b`
(resp., `b ≤ f x`), then `a ≤ b` (resp., `b ≤ a`); we also provide primed versions
that assume the inequalities to hold for all `x`.
### Min, max, `sSup` and `sInf`
* `Continuous.min`, `Continuous.max`: pointwise `min`/`max` of two continuous functions is
continuous.
* `Tendsto.min`, `Tendsto.max` : if `f` tends to `a` and `g` tends to `b`, then their pointwise
`min`/`max` tend to `min a b` and `max a b`, respectively.
-/
open Set Filter
open OrderDual (toDual)
open scoped Topology
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIicTopology α` means that `Iic a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIicTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `(-∞, a]` is closed. -/
isClosed_Iic (a : α) : IsClosed (Iic a)
/-- If `α` is a topological space and a preorder, `ClosedIciTopology α` means that `Ici a` is
closed for all `a : α`. -/
class ClosedIciTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- For any `a`, the set `[a, +∞)` is closed. -/
isClosed_Ici (a : α) : IsClosed (Ici a)
/-- A topology on a set which is both a topological space and a preorder is _order-closed_ if the
set of points `(x, y)` with `x ≤ y` is closed in the product space. We introduce this as a mixin.
This property is satisfied for the order topology on a linear order, but it can be satisfied more
generally, and suffices to derive many interesting properties relating order and topology. -/
class OrderClosedTopology (α : Type*) [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] : Prop where
/-- The set `{ (x, y) | x ≤ y }` is a closed set. -/
isClosed_le' : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 }
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : FirstCountableTopology α] : FirstCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
instance [TopologicalSpace α] [h : SecondCountableTopology α] : SecondCountableTopology αᵒᵈ := h
theorem Dense.orderDual [TopologicalSpace α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) :
Dense (OrderDual.ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
hs
section General
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] {s : Set α}
protected lemma BddAbove.of_closure : BddAbove (closure s) → BddAbove s :=
BddAbove.mono subset_closure
protected lemma BddBelow.of_closure : BddBelow (closure s) → BddBelow s :=
BddBelow.mono subset_closure
end General
section ClosedIicTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Iic : IsClosed (Iic a) :=
ClosedIicTopology.isClosed_Iic a
instance : ClosedIciTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_Iic (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Iic (a : α) : closure (Iic a) = Iic a :=
isClosed_Iic.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem le_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
isClosed_Iic.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem le_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, f c ≤ b) : a ≤ b :=
le_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma upperBounds_closure (s : Set α) : upperBounds (closure s : Set α) = upperBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic, isClosed_Iic.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_closure : BddAbove (closure s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp_rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddAbove.closure⟩ := bddAbove_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot ↔ ¬IsBot a := by
constructor
· intro hd hbot
rw [hbot.atBot_eq, disjoint_principal_right] at hd
exact mem_of_mem_nhds hd le_rfl
· simp only [IsBot, not_forall]
rintro ⟨b, hb⟩
refine disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem disjoint_compl_left ?_ (Iic_mem_atBot b)
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl.mem_nhds hb
theorem IsLUB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsLUB (range f) a :=
⟨forall_mem_range.mpr hle, fun _c hc ↦ le_of_tendsto' hlim fun i ↦ hc <| mem_range_self i⟩
end Preorder
section NoBotOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoBotOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atBot (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atBot := by simp
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atBot (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atBot = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atBot (hf : Tendsto f l atBot) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atBot_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atBot :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atBot a)
end NoBotOrder
theorem iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [Filter.NeBot F]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, f i ≤ a) (hlim : Filter.Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨆ i, f i = a :=
have := F.nonempty_of_neBot
(IsLUB.range_of_tendsto hle hlim).ciSup_eq
theorem iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIicTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, f i < a) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Iic (f i) = Iio a := by
have obs : a ∉ range f := by
rw [mem_range]
rintro ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact (hlt i).false
rw [← biUnion_range, (IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (le_of_lt <| hlt ·) hlim).biUnion_Iic_eq_Iio obs]
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIicTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Ioi : IsOpen (Ioi a) := by
rw [← compl_Iic]
exact isClosed_Iic.isOpen_compl
@[simp]
theorem interior_Ioi : interior (Ioi a) = Ioi a :=
isOpen_Ioi.interior_eq
theorem Ioi_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ioi a ∈ 𝓝 b := IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioi h
theorem eventually_gt_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b < x := Ioi_mem_nhds hab
theorem Ici_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Ici a ∈ 𝓝 b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioi_mem_nhds h) Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem eventually_ge_nhds (hab : b < a) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, b ≤ x := Ici_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u < f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_gt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_gt_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_lt
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : u < v)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, u ≤ f a :=
h.eventually <| eventually_ge_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_ge_of_tendsto_gt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_const_le
protected theorem Dense.exists_gt [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x < y :=
hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi (exists_gt x)
protected theorem Dense.exists_ge [NoMaxOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(hs.exists_gt x).imp fun _ h ↦ ⟨h.1, h.2.le⟩
theorem Dense.exists_ge' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (htop : ∀ x, IsTop x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y := by
by_cases hx : IsTop x
· exact ⟨x, htop x hx, le_rfl⟩
· simp only [IsTop, not_forall, not_le] at hx
rcases hs.exists_mem_open isOpen_Ioi hx with ⟨y, hys, hy : x < y⟩
exact ⟨y, hys, hy.le⟩
/-!
### Left neighborhoods on a `ClosedIicTopology`
Limits to the left of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the left,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[<] a` and `𝓝[≤] a`.
Here we prove that all left-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := by
simpa only [← Iio_inter_Ioi] using inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (Ioi_mem_nhds H)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT H.1) <| Ioo_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[<] b = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| h.Ioo_eq ▸ Ioo_mem_nhdsLT h.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iio := CovBy.nhdsLT
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLT [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[<] a = ⊥ := by
if h : IsMin a then simp [h.Iio_eq]
else exact (Order.pred_covBy_of_not_isMin h).nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iio := PredOrder.nhdsLT
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[>] a = 𝓝[≠] a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGT, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds [PredOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≥] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsLT_sup_nhdsGE, PredOrder.nhdsLT, bot_sup_eq]
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ico_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ico_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[<] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[<] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLT_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iio' := Icc_mem_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] b = 𝓝[<] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Iio := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsLT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Iio (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iio b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsLT h]
/-!
#### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsLE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, H.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Iic := CovBy.nhdsLE
protected theorem PredOrder.nhdsLE [PredOrder α] : 𝓝[≤] b = pure b := by
rw [← Iio_insert, nhdsWithin_insert, PredOrder.nhdsLT, sup_bot_eq]
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")]
protected alias PredOrder.nhdsWithin_Iic := PredOrder.nhdsLE
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
inter_mem (nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds H) self_mem_nhdsWithin
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioo_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-21")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ico_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE H.1) <| Ioc_subset_Ioc_right H.2
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioc a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[≤] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem H) Ioc_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsLE (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≤] b := Icc_mem_nhdsLE_of_mem ⟨H, le_rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Iic' := Icc_mem_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Icc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ici_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioc a b] b = 𝓝[≤] b :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Ioi_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Iic := nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Icc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Icc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsLE h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioc_iff_Iic (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioc a b) b ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Iic b) b := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsLE h]
end LinearOrder
end ClosedIicTopology
section ClosedIciTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [ClosedIciTopology α] {f : β → α} {a b : α} {s : Set α}
theorem isClosed_Ici {a : α} : IsClosed (Ici a) :=
ClosedIciTopology.isClosed_Ici a
instance : ClosedIicTopology αᵒᵈ where
isClosed_Iic _ := isClosed_Ici (α := α)
@[simp]
theorem closure_Ici (a : α) : closure (Ici a) = Ici a :=
isClosed_Ici.closure_eq
lemma ge_of_tendsto_of_frequently {x : Filter β} (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∃ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
isClosed_Ici.mem_of_frequently_of_tendsto h lim
theorem ge_of_tendsto {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ᶠ c in x, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
isClosed_Ici.mem_of_tendsto lim h
theorem ge_of_tendsto' {x : Filter β} [NeBot x] (lim : Tendsto f x (𝓝 a))
(h : ∀ c, b ≤ f c) : b ≤ a :=
ge_of_tendsto lim (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp] lemma lowerBounds_closure (s : Set α) : lowerBounds (closure s : Set α) = lowerBounds s :=
ext fun a ↦ by simp_rw [mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici, isClosed_Ici.closure_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_closure : BddBelow (closure s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp_rw [BddBelow, lowerBounds_closure]
protected alias ⟨_, BddBelow.closure⟩ := bddBelow_closure
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_nhds_atTop_iff : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atTop ↔ ¬IsTop a :=
disjoint_nhds_atBot_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
theorem IsGLB.range_of_tendsto {F : Filter β} [F.NeBot] (hle : ∀ i, a ≤ f i)
(hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) : IsGLB (range f) a :=
IsLUB.range_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hle hlim
end Preorder
section NoTopOrder
variable [Preorder α] [NoTopOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α] {a : α}
{l : Filter β} [NeBot l] {f : β → α}
theorem disjoint_nhds_atTop (a : α) : Disjoint (𝓝 a) atTop := disjoint_nhds_atBot (toDual a)
@[simp]
theorem inf_nhds_atTop (a : α) : 𝓝 a ⊓ atTop = ⊥ := (disjoint_nhds_atTop a).eq_bot
theorem not_tendsto_nhds_of_tendsto_atTop (hf : Tendsto f l atTop) (a : α) : ¬Tendsto f l (𝓝 a) :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atTop a).symm
theorem not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds (hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : ¬Tendsto f l atTop :=
hf.not_tendsto (disjoint_nhds_atTop a)
end NoTopOrder
theorem iInf_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hle : ∀ i, a ≤ f i) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⨅ i, f i = a :=
iSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hle hlim
theorem iUnion_Ici_eq_Ioi_of_lt_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {F : Filter ι} [F.NeBot]
[ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [ClosedIciTopology α]
{a : α} {f : ι → α} (hlt : ∀ i, a < f i) (hlim : Tendsto f F (𝓝 a)) :
⋃ i : ι, Ici (f i) = Ioi a :=
iUnion_Iic_eq_Iio_of_lt_of_tendsto (α := αᵒᵈ) hlt hlim
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [ClosedIciTopology α] [TopologicalSpace β]
{a b c : α} {f : α → β}
theorem isOpen_Iio : IsOpen (Iio a) := isOpen_Ioi (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] theorem interior_Iio : interior (Iio a) = Iio a := isOpen_Iio.interior_eq
theorem Iio_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Iio b ∈ 𝓝 a := isOpen_Iio.mem_nhds h
theorem eventually_lt_nhds (hab : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x < b := Iio_mem_nhds hab
theorem Iic_mem_nhds (h : a < b) : Iic b ∈ 𝓝 a :=
mem_of_superset (Iio_mem_nhds h) Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem eventually_le_nhds (hab : a < b) : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ≤ b := Iic_mem_nhds hab
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt_const {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : v < u)
(h : Filter.Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, f a < u :=
h.eventually <| eventually_lt_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_lt_of_tendsto_lt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_lt_const
theorem Filter.Tendsto.eventually_le_const {l : Filter γ} {f : γ → α} {u v : α} (hv : v < u)
(h : Tendsto f l (𝓝 v)) : ∀ᶠ a in l, f a ≤ u :=
h.eventually <| eventually_le_nhds hv
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-17")]
alias eventually_le_of_tendsto_lt := Filter.Tendsto.eventually_le_const
protected theorem Dense.exists_lt [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_gt x
protected theorem Dense.exists_le [NoMinOrder α] {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_ge x
theorem Dense.exists_le' {s : Set α} (hs : Dense s) (hbot : ∀ x, IsBot x → x ∈ s) (x : α) :
∃ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
hs.orderDual.exists_ge' hbot x
/-!
### Right neighborhoods on a `ClosedIciTopology`
Limits to the right of real functions are defined in terms of neighborhoods to the right,
either open or closed, i.e., members of `𝓝[>] a` and `𝓝[≥] a`.
Here we prove that all right-neighborhoods of a point are equal,
and we prove other useful characterizations which require the stronger hypothesis `OrderTopology α`
in another file.
-/
/-!
#### Point excluded
-/
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_nhdsWithin.2
⟨Iio c, isOpen_Iio, H.2, by rw [inter_comm, Ioi_inter_Iio]; exact Ioo_subset_Ioo_left H.1⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ioo_mem_nhdsGT
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsGT (h : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ := h.toDual.nhdsLT
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Ioi := CovBy.nhdsGT
protected theorem SuccOrder.nhdsGT [SuccOrder α] : 𝓝[>] a = ⊥ := PredOrder.nhdsLT (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias SuccOrder.nhdsWithin_Ioi := SuccOrder.nhdsGT
theorem SuccOrder.nhdsLT_eq_nhdsNE [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[<] a = 𝓝[≠] a :=
PredOrder.nhdsGT_eq_nhdsNE (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem SuccOrder.nhdsLE_eq_nhds [SuccOrder α] (a : α) : 𝓝[≤] a = 𝓝 a :=
PredOrder.nhdsGE_eq_nhds (α := αᵒᵈ) a
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ioc a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ioc_mem_nhdsGT
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ico_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Ico_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Ico_mem_nhdsGT
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[>] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi := Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGT (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[>] a := Icc_mem_nhdsGT_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ioi' := Icc_mem_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioc a b] a = 𝓝[>] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iic_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi := nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ioo a b] a = 𝓝[>] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iio_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsWithin_Ioi := nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioc_iff_Ioi (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioc a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioc_eq_nhdsGT h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ioo_iff_Ioi (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioo a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ioi a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ioo_eq_nhdsGT h]
/-!
### Point included
-/
protected theorem CovBy.nhdsGE (H : a ⋖ b) : 𝓝[≥] a = pure a := H.toDual.nhdsLE
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias CovBy.nhdsWithin_Ici := CovBy.nhdsGE
protected theorem SuccOrder.nhdsGE [SuccOrder α] : 𝓝[≥] a = pure a :=
PredOrder.nhdsLE (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias SuccOrder.nhdsWithin_Ici := SuccOrder.nhdsGE
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGE (H : a < b) : Ico a b ∈ 𝓝[≥] a :=
inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ <| Iio_mem_nhds H
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici' := Ico_mem_nhdsGE
theorem Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Ico a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE H.2) <| Ico_subset_Ico_left H.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ico_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioo a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE H.2) <| Ico_subset_Ioo_left H.1
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Ioo_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Ioc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ioo a c) : Ioc a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ioo_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem H) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Ioc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Ioc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem (H : b ∈ Ico a c) : Icc a c ∈ 𝓝[≥] b :=
mem_of_superset (Ico_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem H) Ico_subset_Icc_self
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici := Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem
theorem Icc_mem_nhdsGE (H : a < b) : Icc a b ∈ 𝓝[≥] a := Icc_mem_nhdsGE_of_mem ⟨le_rfl, H⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")] alias Icc_mem_nhdsWithin_Ici' := Icc_mem_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Icc a b] a = 𝓝[≥] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iic_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsWithin_Ici := nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE (h : a < b) : 𝓝[Ico a b] a = 𝓝[≥] a :=
nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| Iio_mem_nhds h
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-22")]
alias nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsWithin_Ici := nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Icc_iff_Ici (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Icc a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Icc_eq_nhdsGE h]
@[simp]
theorem continuousWithinAt_Ico_iff_Ici (h : a < b) :
ContinuousWithinAt f (Ico a b) a ↔ ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici a) a := by
simp only [ContinuousWithinAt, nhdsWithin_Ico_eq_nhdsGE h]
end LinearOrder
end ClosedIciTopology
section OrderClosedTopology
section Preorder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [Preorder α] [t : OrderClosedTopology α]
namespace Subtype
-- todo: add `OrderEmbedding.orderClosedTopology`
instance {p : α → Prop} : OrderClosedTopology (Subtype p) :=
have this : Continuous fun p : Subtype p × Subtype p => ((p.fst : α), (p.snd : α)) :=
continuous_subtype_val.prodMap continuous_subtype_val
OrderClosedTopology.mk (t.isClosed_le'.preimage this)
end Subtype
theorem isClosed_le_prod : IsClosed { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
t.isClosed_le'
theorem isClosed_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsClosed { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
continuous_iff_isClosed.mp (hf.prodMk hg) _ isClosed_le_prod
instance : ClosedIicTopology α where
isClosed_Iic _ := isClosed_le continuous_id continuous_const
instance : ClosedIciTopology α where
isClosed_Ici _ := isClosed_le continuous_const continuous_id
instance : OrderClosedTopology αᵒᵈ :=
⟨(OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le' (α := α)).preimage continuous_swap⟩
theorem isClosed_Icc {a b : α} : IsClosed (Icc a b) :=
IsClosed.inter isClosed_Ici isClosed_Iic
@[simp]
theorem closure_Icc (a b : α) : closure (Icc a b) = Icc a b :=
isClosed_Icc.closure_eq
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto {f g : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : f ≤ᶠ[b] g) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
have : Tendsto (fun b => (f b, g b)) b (𝓝 (a₁, a₂)) := hf.prodMk_nhds hg
show (a₁, a₂) ∈ { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } from t.isClosed_le'.mem_of_tendsto this h
alias tendsto_le_of_eventuallyLE := le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto
theorem le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto' {f g : β → α} {b : Filter β} {a₁ a₂ : α} [NeBot b]
(hf : Tendsto f b (𝓝 a₁)) (hg : Tendsto g b (𝓝 a₂)) (h : ∀ x, f x ≤ g x) : a₁ ≤ a₂ :=
le_of_tendsto_of_tendsto hf hg (Eventually.of_forall h)
@[simp]
theorem closure_le_eq [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
closure { b | f b ≤ g b } = { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
(isClosed_le hf hg).closure_eq
theorem closure_lt_subset_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : Continuous g) : closure { b | f b < g b } ⊆ { b | f b ≤ g b } :=
(closure_minimal fun _ => le_of_lt) <| isClosed_le hf hg
theorem ContinuousWithinAt.closure_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} {x : β}
(hx : x ∈ closure s) (hf : ContinuousWithinAt f s x) (hg : ContinuousWithinAt g s x)
(h : ∀ y ∈ s, f y ≤ g y) : f x ≤ g x :=
show (f x, g x) ∈ { p : α × α | p.1 ≤ p.2 } from
OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'.closure_subset ((hf.prodMk hg).mem_closure hx h)
/-- If `s` is a closed set and two functions `f` and `g` are continuous on `s`,
then the set `{x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x}` is a closed set. -/
theorem IsClosed.isClosed_le [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hg : ContinuousOn g s) : IsClosed ({ x ∈ s | f x ≤ g x }) :=
(hf.prodMk hg).preimage_isClosed_of_isClosed hs OrderClosedTopology.isClosed_le'
theorem le_on_closure [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} {s : Set β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≤ g x)
(hf : ContinuousOn f (closure s)) (hg : ContinuousOn g (closure s)) ⦃x⦄ (hx : x ∈ closure s) :
f x ≤ g x :=
have : s ⊆ { y ∈ closure s | f y ≤ g y } := fun y hy => ⟨subset_closure hy, h y hy⟩
(closure_minimal this (isClosed_closure.isClosed_le hf hg) hx).2
theorem IsClosed.epigraph [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsClosed { p : β × α | p.1 ∈ s ∧ f p.1 ≤ p.2 } :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).isClosed_le (hf.comp continuousOn_fst Subset.rfl) continuousOn_snd
theorem IsClosed.hypograph [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} (hs : IsClosed s)
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) : IsClosed { p : β × α | p.1 ∈ s ∧ p.2 ≤ f p.1 } :=
(hs.preimage continuous_fst).isClosed_le continuousOn_snd (hf.comp continuousOn_fst Subset.rfl)
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [PartialOrder α] [t : OrderClosedTopology α]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 90) OrderClosedTopology.to_t2Space : T2Space α :=
t2_iff_isClosed_diagonal.2 <| by
simpa only [diagonal, le_antisymm_iff] using
t.isClosed_le'.inter (isClosed_le continuous_snd continuous_fst)
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [TopologicalSpace α] [LinearOrder α] [OrderClosedTopology α]
theorem isOpen_lt [TopologicalSpace β] {f g : β → α} (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Continuous g) :
IsOpen { b | f b < g b } := by
simpa only [lt_iff_not_le] using (isClosed_le hg hf).isOpen_compl
theorem isOpen_lt_prod : IsOpen { p : α × α | p.1 < p.2 } :=
isOpen_lt continuous_fst continuous_snd
variable {a b : α}
theorem isOpen_Ioo : IsOpen (Ioo a b) :=
IsOpen.inter isOpen_Ioi isOpen_Iio
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/OrderClosed.lean | 813 | 820 | theorem interior_Ioo : interior (Ioo a b) = Ioo a b :=
isOpen_Ioo.interior_eq
theorem Ioo_subset_closure_interior : Ioo a b ⊆ closure (interior (Ioo a b)) := by | simp only [interior_Ioo, subset_closure]
theorem Ioo_mem_nhds {a b x : α} (ha : a < x) (hb : x < b) : Ioo a b ∈ 𝓝 x :=
IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_Ioo ⟨ha, hb⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Iterate
import Mathlib.Order.SemiconjSup
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.MonotoneContinuity
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharP.Defs
/-!
# Translation number of a monotone real map that commutes with `x ↦ x + 1`
Let `f : ℝ → ℝ` be a monotone map such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`. Then the limit
$$
\tau(f)=\lim_{n\to\infty}{f^n(x)-x}{n}
$$
exists and does not depend on `x`. This number is called the *translation number* of `f`.
Different authors use different notation for this number: `τ`, `ρ`, `rot`, etc
In this file we define a structure `CircleDeg1Lift` for bundled maps with these properties, define
translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`, prove some estimates relating `f^n(x)-x` to `τ(f)`. In
case of a continuous map `f` we also prove that `f` admits a point `x` such that `f^n(x)=x+m` if and
only if `τ(f)=m/n`.
Maps of this type naturally appear as lifts of orientation preserving circle homeomorphisms. More
precisely, let `f` be an orientation preserving homeomorphism of the circle $S^1=ℝ/ℤ$, and
consider a real number `a` such that
`⟦a⟧ = f 0`, where `⟦⟧` means the natural projection `ℝ → ℝ/ℤ`. Then there exists a unique
continuous function `F : ℝ → ℝ` such that `F 0 = a` and `⟦F x⟧ = f ⟦x⟧` for all `x` (this fact is
not formalized yet). This function is strictly monotone, continuous, and satisfies
`F (x + 1) = F x + 1`. The number `⟦τ F⟧ : ℝ / ℤ` is called the *rotation number* of `f`.
It does not depend on the choice of `a`.
## Main definitions
* `CircleDeg1Lift`: a monotone map `f : ℝ → ℝ` such that `f (x + 1) = f x + 1` for all `x`;
the type `CircleDeg1Lift` is equipped with `Lattice` and `Monoid` structures; the
multiplication is given by composition: `(f * g) x = f (g x)`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`: translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Main statements
We prove the following properties of `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_dist_bounded`: if the distance between `(f^n) 0`
and `(g^n) 0` is bounded from above uniformly in `n : ℕ`, then `f` and `g` have equal
translation numbers.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_of_semiconjBy`: if two `CircleDeg1Lift` maps `f`, `g`
are semiconjugate by a `CircleDeg1Lift` map, then `τ f = τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_units_inv`: if `f` is an invertible `CircleDeg1Lift` map
(equivalently, `f` is a lift of an orientation-preserving circle homeomorphism), then
the translation number of `f⁻¹` is the negative of the translation number of `f`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_mul_of_commute`: if `f` and `g` commute, then
`τ (f * g) = τ f + τ g`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.translationNumber_eq_rat_iff`: the translation number of `f` is equal to
a rational number `m / n` if and only if `(f^n) x = x + m` for some `x`.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_bijective_of_translationNumber_eq`: if `f` and `g` are two
bijective `CircleDeg1Lift` maps and their translation numbers are equal, then these
maps are semiconjugate to each other.
* `CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`: let `f₁` and `f₂` be
two actions of a group `G` on the circle by degree 1 maps (formally, `f₁` and `f₂` are two
homomorphisms from `G →* CircleDeg1Lift`). If the translation numbers of `f₁ g` and `f₂ g` are
equal to each other for all `g : G`, then these two actions are semiconjugate by some
`F : CircleDeg1Lift`. This is a version of Proposition 5.4 from [Étienne Ghys, Groupes
d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes].
## Notation
We use a local notation `τ` for the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Implementation notes
We define the translation number of `f : CircleDeg1Lift` to be the limit of the sequence
`(f ^ (2 ^ n)) 0 / (2 ^ n)`, then prove that `((f ^ n) x - x) / n` tends to this number for any `x`.
This way it is much easier to prove that the limit exists and basic properties of the limit.
We define translation number for a wider class of maps `f : ℝ → ℝ` instead of lifts of orientation
preserving circle homeomorphisms for two reasons:
* non-strictly monotone circle self-maps with discontinuities naturally appear as Poincaré maps
for some flows on the two-torus (e.g., one can take a constant flow and glue in a few Cherry
cells);
* definition and some basic properties still work for this class.
## References
* [Étienne Ghys, Groupes d'homeomorphismes du cercle et cohomologie bornee][ghys87:groupes]
## TODO
Here are some short-term goals.
* Introduce a structure or a typeclass for lifts of circle homeomorphisms. We use
`Units CircleDeg1Lift` for now, but it's better to have a dedicated type (or a typeclass?).
* Prove that the `SemiconjBy` relation on circle homeomorphisms is an equivalence relation.
* Introduce `ConditionallyCompleteLattice` structure, use it in the proof of
`CircleDeg1Lift.semiconj_of_group_action_of_forall_translationNumber_eq`.
* Prove that the orbits of the irrational rotation are dense in the circle. Deduce that a
homeomorphism with an irrational rotation is semiconjugate to the corresponding irrational
translation by a continuous `CircleDeg1Lift`.
## Tags
circle homeomorphism, rotation number
-/
open Filter Set Int Topology
open Function hiding Commute
/-!
### Definition and monoid structure
-/
/-- A lift of a monotone degree one map `S¹ → S¹`. -/
structure CircleDeg1Lift : Type extends ℝ →o ℝ where
map_add_one' : ∀ x, toFun (x + 1) = toFun x + 1
namespace CircleDeg1Lift
instance : FunLike CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' | ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, ⟨⟨_, _⟩, _⟩, rfl => rfl
instance : OrderHomClass CircleDeg1Lift ℝ ℝ where
map_rel f _ _ h := f.monotone' h
@[simp] theorem coe_mk (f h) : ⇑(mk f h) = f := rfl
variable (f g : CircleDeg1Lift)
@[simp] theorem coe_toOrderHom : ⇑f.toOrderHom = f := rfl
protected theorem monotone : Monotone f := f.monotone'
@[mono] theorem mono {x y} (h : x ≤ y) : f x ≤ f y := f.monotone h
theorem strictMono_iff_injective : StrictMono f ↔ Injective f :=
f.monotone.strictMono_iff_injective
@[simp]
theorem map_add_one : ∀ x, f (x + 1) = f x + 1 :=
f.map_add_one'
@[simp]
theorem map_one_add (x : ℝ) : f (1 + x) = 1 + f x := by rw [add_comm, map_add_one, add_comm 1]
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃f g : CircleDeg1Lift⦄ (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
instance : Monoid CircleDeg1Lift where
mul f g :=
{ toOrderHom := f.1.comp g.1
map_add_one' := fun x => by simp [map_add_one] }
one := ⟨.id, fun _ => rfl⟩
mul_one _ := rfl
one_mul _ := rfl
mul_assoc _ _ _ := DFunLike.coe_injective rfl
instance : Inhabited CircleDeg1Lift := ⟨1⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_mul : ⇑(f * g) = f ∘ g :=
rfl
theorem mul_apply (x) : (f * g) x = f (g x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ⇑(1 : CircleDeg1Lift) = id :=
rfl
instance unitsHasCoeToFun : CoeFun CircleDeg1Liftˣ fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨fun f => ⇑(f : CircleDeg1Lift)⟩
@[simp]
theorem units_inv_apply_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
(f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (f x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.inv_mul, coe_one, id]
@[simp]
theorem units_apply_inv_apply (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) (x : ℝ) :
f ((f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) x) = x := by simp only [← mul_apply, f.mul_inv, coe_one, id]
/-- If a lift of a circle map is bijective, then it is an order automorphism of the line. -/
def toOrderIso : CircleDeg1Liftˣ →* ℝ ≃o ℝ where
toFun f :=
{ toFun := f
invFun := ⇑f⁻¹
left_inv := units_inv_apply_apply f
right_inv := units_apply_inv_apply f
map_rel_iff' := ⟨fun h => by simpa using mono (↑f⁻¹) h, mono f⟩ }
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' _ _ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f) = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_symm (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :
⇑(toOrderIso f).symm = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_toOrderIso_inv (f : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) : ⇑(toOrderIso f)⁻¹ = (f⁻¹ : CircleDeg1Liftˣ) :=
rfl
theorem isUnit_iff_bijective {f : CircleDeg1Lift} : IsUnit f ↔ Bijective f :=
⟨fun ⟨u, h⟩ => h ▸ (toOrderIso u).bijective, fun h =>
Units.isUnit
{ val := f
inv :=
{ toFun := (Equiv.ofBijective f h).symm
monotone' := fun x y hxy =>
(f.strictMono_iff_injective.2 h.1).le_iff_le.1
(by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h, hxy])
map_add_one' := fun x =>
h.1 <| by simp only [Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f, f.map_add_one] }
val_inv := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_apply_symm_apply f h
inv_val := ext <| Equiv.ofBijective_symm_apply_apply f h }⟩
theorem coe_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, ⇑(f ^ n) = f^[n]
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by
ext x
simp [coe_pow n, pow_succ]
theorem semiconjBy_iff_semiconj {f g₁ g₂ : CircleDeg1Lift} :
SemiconjBy f g₁ g₂ ↔ Semiconj f g₁ g₂ :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
theorem commute_iff_commute {f g : CircleDeg1Lift} : Commute f g ↔ Function.Commute f g :=
CircleDeg1Lift.ext_iff
/-!
### Translate by a constant
-/
/-- The map `y ↦ x + y` as a `CircleDeg1Lift`. More precisely, we define a homomorphism from
`Multiplicative ℝ` to `CircleDeg1Liftˣ`, so the translation by `x` is
`translation (Multiplicative.ofAdd x)`. -/
def translate : Multiplicative ℝ →* CircleDeg1Liftˣ := MonoidHom.toHomUnits <|
{ toFun := fun x =>
⟨⟨fun y => x.toAdd + y, fun _ _ h => add_le_add_left h _⟩, fun _ =>
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm⟩
map_one' := ext <| zero_add
map_mul' := fun _ _ => ext <| add_assoc _ _ }
@[simp]
theorem translate_apply (x y : ℝ) : translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) y = x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_inv_apply (x y : ℝ) : (translate <| Multiplicative.ofAdd x)⁻¹ y = -x + y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem translate_zpow (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
simp only [← zsmul_eq_mul, ofAdd_zsmul, MonoidHom.map_zpow]
@[simp]
theorem translate_pow (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x) ^ n = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) :=
translate_zpow x n
@[simp]
theorem translate_iterate (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) :
(translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd x))^[n] = translate (Multiplicative.ofAdd <| ↑n * x) := by
rw [← coe_pow, ← Units.val_pow_eq_pow_val, translate_pow]
/-!
### Commutativity with integer translations
In this section we prove that `f` commutes with translations by an integer number.
First we formulate these statements (for a natural or an integer number,
addition on the left or on the right, addition or subtraction) using `Function.Commute`,
then reformulate as `simp` lemmas `map_int_add` etc.
-/
theorem commute_nat_add (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by
simpa only [nsmul_one, add_left_iterate] using Function.Commute.iterate_right f.map_one_add n
theorem commute_add_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· + n) := by
simp only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ), f.commute_nat_add n]
theorem commute_sub_nat (n : ℕ) : Function.Commute f (· - n) := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using
(f.commute_add_nat n).inverses_right (Equiv.addRight _).right_inv (Equiv.addRight _).left_inv
theorem commute_add_int : ∀ n : ℤ, Function.Commute f (· + n)
| (n : ℕ) => f.commute_add_nat n
| -[n+1] => by simpa [sub_eq_add_neg] using f.commute_sub_nat (n + 1)
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Circle/RotationNumber/TranslationNumber.lean | 307 | 309 | theorem commute_int_add (n : ℤ) : Function.Commute f (n + ·) := by | simpa only [add_comm _ (n : ℝ)] using f.commute_add_int n |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.IndicatorFunction
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEEqFun
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSeminorm.Defs
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Countable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Sub
/-!
# Basic theorems about ℒp space
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology ComplexConjugate
variable {α ε ε' E F G : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {p : ℝ≥0∞} {q : ℝ} {μ ν : Measure α}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedAddCommGroup G] [ENorm ε] [ENorm ε']
namespace MeasureTheory
section Lp
section Top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ :=
hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_lt_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} (hfp : MemLp f p μ) :
eLpNorm f p μ ≠ ∞ :=
ne_of_lt hfp.2
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.eLpNorm_ne_top := MemLp.eLpNorm_ne_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hq0_lt : 0 < q)
(hfq : eLpNorm' f q μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ q ∂μ < ∞ := by
rw [lintegral_rpow_enorm_eq_rpow_eLpNorm' hq0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hq0_lt) (ne_of_lt hfq)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top' :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
theorem lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hfp : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞) : ∫⁻ a, ‖f a‖ₑ ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ := by
apply lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm'_lt_top
· exact ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
· simpa [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using hfp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")]
alias lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top :=
lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top
theorem eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top {f : α → ε} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0)
(hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) : eLpNorm f p μ < ∞ ↔ ∫⁻ a, (‖f a‖ₑ) ^ p.toReal ∂μ < ∞ :=
⟨lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top_of_eLpNorm_lt_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, by
intro h
have hp' := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
have : 0 < 1 / p.toReal := div_pos zero_lt_one hp'
simpa [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (le_of_lt this) (ne_of_lt h)⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-04")] alias
eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_nnnorm_lt_top := eLpNorm_lt_top_iff_lintegral_rpow_enorm_lt_top
end Top
section Zero
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 μ = 1 := by
rw [eLpNorm', div_zero, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f 0 μ = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm]
@[simp]
theorem memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace ε] {f : α → ε} :
MemLp f 0 μ ↔ AEStronglyMeasurable f μ := by simp [MemLp, eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable := memLp_zero_iff_aestronglyMeasurable
section ENormedAddMonoid
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ENormedAddMonoid ε]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero (hp0_lt : 0 < q) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, hp0_lt]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_zero' (hq0_ne : q ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNorm' (0 : α → ε) q μ = 0 := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 q with hq0 | hq_neg
· exact eLpNorm'_zero (lt_of_le_of_ne hq0 hq0_ne.symm)
· simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, ENNReal.rpow_eq_zero_iff, hμ, hq_neg]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_zero : eLpNormEssSup (0 : α → ε) μ = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup, ← bot_eq_zero', essSup_const_bot]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero : eLpNorm (0 : α → ε) p μ = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp only [h_top, eLpNorm_exponent_top, eLpNormEssSup_zero]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_zero' : eLpNorm (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ = 0 := eLpNorm_zero
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero : MemLp (0 : α → ε) p μ :=
⟨aestronglyMeasurable_zero, by rw [eLpNorm_zero]; exact ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
@[simp] lemma MemLp.zero' : MemLp (fun _ : α => (0 : ε)) p μ := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.zero' := MemLp.zero'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_memℒp := MemLp.zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias zero_mem_ℒp := MemLp.zero'
variable [MeasurableSpace α]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_pos {f : α → ε} (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_pos]
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_exponent_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm' f 0 (0 : Measure α) = 1 := by
simp [eLpNorm']
theorem eLpNorm'_measure_zero_of_neg {f : α → ε} (hq_neg : q < 0) :
eLpNorm' f q (0 : Measure α) = ∞ := by simp [eLpNorm', hq_neg]
end ENormedAddMonoid
@[simp]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNormEssSup f (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
simp [eLpNormEssSup]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : eLpNorm f p (0 : Measure α) = 0 := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top]
rw [← Ne] at h0
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm', ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
section ContinuousENorm
variable {ε : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε] [ContinuousENorm ε]
@[simp] lemma memLp_measure_zero {f : α → ε} : MemLp f p (0 : Measure α) := by
simp [MemLp]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_measure_zero := memLp_measure_zero
end ContinuousENorm
end Zero
section Neg
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm'_neg (f : α → F) (q : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm' (-f) q μ = eLpNorm' f q μ := by
simp [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm]
@[simp]
theorem eLpNorm_neg (f : α → F) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : eLpNorm (-f) p μ = eLpNorm f p μ := by
by_cases h0 : p = 0
· simp [h0]
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top]
lemma eLpNorm_sub_comm (f g : α → E) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) :
eLpNorm (f - g) p μ = eLpNorm (g - f) p μ := by simp [← eLpNorm_neg (f := f - g)]
theorem MemLp.neg {f : α → E} (hf : MemLp f p μ) : MemLp (-f) p μ :=
⟨AEStronglyMeasurable.neg hf.1, by simp [hf.right]⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.neg := MemLp.neg
theorem memLp_neg_iff {f : α → E} : MemLp (-f) p μ ↔ MemLp f p μ :=
⟨fun h => neg_neg f ▸ h.neg, MemLp.neg⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_neg_iff := memLp_neg_iff
end Neg
section Const
variable {ε' ε'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace ε'] [ContinuousENorm ε']
[TopologicalSpace ε''] [ENormedAddMonoid ε'']
theorem eLpNorm'_const (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (by simp [hq_pos.le] : 0 ≤ 1 / q)]
congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hq_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hq_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ (ne_of_lt hq_pos).symm]
-- Generalising this to ENormedAddMonoid requires a case analysis whether ‖c‖ₑ = ⊤,
-- and will happen in a future PR.
theorem eLpNorm'_const' [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (c : F) (hc_ne_zero : c ≠ 0) (hq_ne_zero : q ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [eLpNorm'_eq_lintegral_enorm, lintegral_const,
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_ne_top _ (measure_ne_top μ Set.univ)]
· congr
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul]
suffices hp_cancel : q * (1 / q) = 1 by rw [hp_cancel, ENNReal.rpow_one]
rw [one_div, mul_inv_cancel₀ hq_ne_zero]
· rw [Ne, ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff, not_or, not_and_or, not_and_or]
simp [hc_ne_zero]
theorem eLpNormEssSup_const (c : ε) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) : eLpNormEssSup (fun _ : α => c) μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by
rw [eLpNormEssSup_eq_essSup_enorm, essSup_const _ hμ]
theorem eLpNorm'_const_of_isProbabilityMeasure (c : ε) (hq_pos : 0 < q) [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] :
eLpNorm' (fun _ : α => c) q μ = ‖c‖ₑ := by simp [eLpNorm'_const c hq_pos, measure_univ]
theorem eLpNorm_const (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (hμ : μ ≠ 0) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
by_cases h_top : p = ∞
· simp [h_top, eLpNormEssSup_const c hμ]
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
theorem eLpNorm_const' (c : ε) (h0 : p ≠ 0) (h_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ = ‖c‖ₑ * μ Set.univ ^ (1 / ENNReal.toReal p) := by
simp [eLpNorm_eq_eLpNorm' h0 h_top, eLpNorm'_const, ENNReal.toReal_pos h0 h_top]
-- NB. If ‖c‖ₑ = ∞ and μ is finite, this claim is false: the right has side is true,
-- but the left hand side is false (as the norm is infinite).
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm {c : ε''} (hc' : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ∞)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ := by
have hp : 0 < p.toReal := ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· simp only [hμ, Measure.coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply, or_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top,
eLpNorm_measure_zero]
by_cases hc : c = 0
· simp only [hc, true_or, eq_self_iff_true, ENNReal.zero_lt_top, eLpNorm_zero']
rw [eLpNorm_const' c hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
obtain hμ_top | hμ_ne_top := eq_or_ne (μ .univ) ∞
· simp [hc, hμ_top, hp]
rw [ENNReal.mul_lt_top_iff]
simpa [hμ, hc, hμ_ne_top, hμ_ne_top.lt_top, hc, hc'.lt_top] using
ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg (inv_nonneg.mpr hp.le) hμ_ne_top
theorem eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff {p : ℝ≥0∞} {c : F} (hp_ne_zero : p ≠ 0) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) :
eLpNorm (fun _ : α => c) p μ < ∞ ↔ c = 0 ∨ μ Set.univ < ∞ :=
eLpNorm_const_lt_top_iff_enorm enorm_ne_top hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/LpSeminorm/Basic.lean | 273 | 274 | theorem memLp_const_enorm {c : ε'} (hc : ‖c‖ₑ ≠ ⊤) [IsFiniteMeasure μ] :
MemLp (fun _ : α ↦ c) p μ := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Log.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Field
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ArithmeticFunction
/-!
# The von Mangoldt Function
In this file we define the von Mangoldt function: the function on natural numbers that returns
`log p` if the input can be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
## Main Results
The main definition for this file is
- `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`: The von Mangoldt function `Λ`.
We then prove the classical summation property of the von Mangoldt function in
`ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt_sum`, that `∑ i ∈ n.divisors, Λ i = Real.log n`, and use this
to deduce alternative expressions for the von Mangoldt function via Möbius inversion, see
`ArithmeticFunction.sum_moebius_mul_log_eq`.
## Notation
We use the standard notation `Λ` to represent the von Mangoldt function.
It is accessible in the locales `ArithmeticFunction` (like the notations for other arithmetic
functions) and also in the locale `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt`.
-/
namespace ArithmeticFunction
open Finset Nat
open scoped ArithmeticFunction
/-- `log` as an arithmetic function `ℕ → ℝ`. Note this is in the `ArithmeticFunction`
namespace to indicate that it is bundled as an `ArithmeticFunction` rather than being the usual
real logarithm. -/
noncomputable def log : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => Real.log n, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem log_apply {n : ℕ} : log n = Real.log n :=
rfl
/--
The `vonMangoldt` function is the function on natural numbers that returns `log p` if the input can
be expressed as `p^k` for a prime `p`.
In the case when `n` is a prime power, `Nat.minFac` will give the appropriate prime, as it is the
smallest prime factor.
In the `ArithmeticFunction` locale, we have the notation `Λ` for this function.
This is also available in the `ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt` locale, allowing for selective
access to the notation.
-/
noncomputable def vonMangoldt : ArithmeticFunction ℝ :=
⟨fun n => if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0, if_neg not_isPrimePow_zero⟩
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction] notation "Λ" => ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
@[inherit_doc] scoped[ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt] notation "Λ" =>
ArithmeticFunction.vonMangoldt
theorem vonMangoldt_apply {n : ℕ} : Λ n = if IsPrimePow n then Real.log (minFac n) else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_one : Λ 1 = 0 := by simp [vonMangoldt_apply]
@[simp]
theorem vonMangoldt_nonneg {n : ℕ} : 0 ≤ Λ n := by
rw [vonMangoldt_apply]
split_ifs
· exact Real.log_nonneg (one_le_cast.2 (Nat.minFac_pos n))
rfl
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_pow {n k : ℕ} (hk : k ≠ 0) : Λ (n ^ k) = Λ n := by
simp only [vonMangoldt_apply, isPrimePow_pow_iff hk, pow_minFac hk]
theorem vonMangoldt_apply_prime {p : ℕ} (hp : p.Prime) : Λ p = Real.log p := by
rw [vonMangoldt_apply, Prime.minFac_eq hp, if_pos hp.prime.isPrimePow]
theorem vonMangoldt_ne_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : Λ n ≠ 0 ↔ IsPrimePow n := by
rcases eq_or_ne n 1 with (rfl | hn); · simp [not_isPrimePow_one]
exact (Real.log_pos (one_lt_cast.2 (minFac_prime hn).one_lt)).ne'.ite_ne_right_iff
theorem vonMangoldt_pos_iff {n : ℕ} : 0 < Λ n ↔ IsPrimePow n :=
vonMangoldt_nonneg.lt_iff_ne.trans (ne_comm.trans vonMangoldt_ne_zero_iff)
theorem vonMangoldt_eq_zero_iff {n : ℕ} : Λ n = 0 ↔ ¬IsPrimePow n :=
vonMangoldt_ne_zero_iff.not_right
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/VonMangoldt.lean | 98 | 100 | theorem vonMangoldt_sum {n : ℕ} : ∑ i ∈ n.divisors, Λ i = Real.log n := by | refine recOnPrimeCoprime ?_ ?_ ?_ n
· simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Fin.Tuple
import Mathlib.Data.Matrix.RowCol
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.VecNotation
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
/-!
# Matrix and vector notation
This file includes `simp` lemmas for applying operations in `Data.Matrix.Basic` to values built out
of the matrix notation `![a, b] = vecCons a (vecCons b vecEmpty)` defined in
`Data.Fin.VecNotation`.
This also provides the new notation `!![a, b; c, d] = Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
This notation also works for empty matrices; `!![,,,] : Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin 3)` and
`!![;;;] : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 0)`.
## Implementation notes
The `simp` lemmas require that one of the arguments is of the form `vecCons _ _`.
This ensures `simp` works with entries only when (some) entries are already given.
In other words, this notation will only appear in the output of `simp` if it
already appears in the input.
## Notations
This file provide notation `!![a, b; c, d]` for matrices, which corresponds to
`Matrix.of ![![a, b], ![c, d]]`.
## Examples
Examples of usage can be found in the `MathlibTest/matrix.lean` file.
-/
namespace Matrix
universe u uₘ uₙ uₒ
variable {α : Type u} {o n m : ℕ} {m' : Type uₘ} {n' : Type uₙ} {o' : Type uₒ}
open Matrix
section toExpr
open Lean Qq
open Qq in
/-- `Matrix.mkLiteralQ !![a, b; c, d]` produces the term `q(!![$a, $b; $c, $d])`. -/
def mkLiteralQ {u : Level} {α : Q(Type u)} {m n : Nat} (elems : Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) Q($α)) :
Q(Matrix (Fin $m) (Fin $n) $α) :=
let elems := PiFin.mkLiteralQ (α := q(Fin $n → $α)) fun i => PiFin.mkLiteralQ fun j => elems i j
q(Matrix.of $elems)
/-- Matrices can be reflected whenever their entries can. We insert a `Matrix.of` to
prevent immediate decay to a function. -/
protected instance toExpr [ToLevel.{u}] [ToLevel.{uₘ}] [ToLevel.{uₙ}]
[Lean.ToExpr α] [Lean.ToExpr m'] [Lean.ToExpr n'] [Lean.ToExpr (m' → n' → α)] :
Lean.ToExpr (Matrix m' n' α) :=
have eα : Q(Type $(toLevel.{u})) := toTypeExpr α
have em' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₘ})) := toTypeExpr m'
have en' : Q(Type $(toLevel.{uₙ})) := toTypeExpr n'
{ toTypeExpr :=
q(Matrix $eα $em' $en')
toExpr := fun M =>
have eM : Q($em' → $en' → $eα) := toExpr (show m' → n' → α from M)
q(Matrix.of $eM) }
end toExpr
section Parser
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
/-- Notation for m×n matrices, aka `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α`.
For instance:
* `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is the matrix with two rows and three columns, of type
`Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 3) α`
* `!![a, b, c]` is a row vector of type `Matrix (Fin 1) (Fin 3) α` (see also `Matrix.row`).
* `!![a; b; c]` is a column vector of type `Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 1) α` (see also `Matrix.col`).
This notation implements some special cases:
* `![,,]`, with `n` `,`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin 0) (Fin n) α`
* `![;;]`, with `m` `;`s, is a term of type `Matrix (Fin m) (Fin 0) α`
* `![]` is the 0×0 matrix
Note that vector notation is provided elsewhere (by `Matrix.vecNotation`) as `![a, b, c]`.
Under the hood, `!![a, b, c; d, e, f]` is syntax for `Matrix.of ![![a, b, c], ![d, e, f]]`.
-/
syntax (name := matrixNotation)
"!![" ppRealGroup(sepBy1(ppGroup(term,+,?), ";", "; ", allowTrailingSep)) "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotationRx0) "!![" ";"+ "]" : term
@[inherit_doc matrixNotation]
syntax (name := matrixNotation0xC) "!![" ","* "]" : term
macro_rules
| `(!![$[$[$rows],*];*]) => do
let m := rows.size
let n := if h : 0 < m then rows[0].size else 0
let rowVecs ← rows.mapM fun row : Array Term => do
unless row.size = n do
Macro.throwErrorAt (mkNullNode row) s!"\
Rows must be of equal length; this row has {row.size} items, \
the previous rows have {n}"
`(![$row,*])
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote m)) (Fin $(quote n)) _ ![$rowVecs,*])
| `(!![$[;%$semicolons]*]) => do
let emptyVec ← `(![])
let emptyVecs := semicolons.map (fun _ => emptyVec)
`(@Matrix.of (Fin $(quote semicolons.size)) (Fin 0) _ ![$emptyVecs,*])
| `(!![$[,%$commas]*]) => `(@Matrix.of (Fin 0) (Fin $(quote commas.size)) _ ![])
/-- Delaborator for the `!![]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def delabMatrixNotation : Delab := whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <|
withOverApp 6 do
let mkApp3 (.const ``Matrix.of _) (.app (.const ``Fin _) em) (.app (.const ``Fin _) en) _ :=
(← getExpr).appFn!.appArg! | failure
let some m ← withNatValue em (pure ∘ some) | failure
let some n ← withNatValue en (pure ∘ some) | failure
withAppArg do
if m = 0 then
guard <| (← getExpr).isAppOfArity ``vecEmpty 1
let commas := .replicate n (mkAtom ",")
`(!![$[,%$commas]*])
else
if n = 0 then
let `(![$[![]%$evecs],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[;%$evecs]*])
else
let `(![$[![$[$melems],*]],*]) ← delab | failure
`(!![$[$[$melems],*];*])
end Parser
variable (a b : ℕ)
/-- Use `![...]` notation for displaying a `Fin`-indexed matrix, for example:
```
#eval !![1, 2; 3, 4] + !![3, 4; 5, 6] -- !![4, 6; 8, 10]
```
-/
instance repr [Repr α] : Repr (Matrix (Fin m) (Fin n) α) where
reprPrec f _p :=
(Std.Format.bracket "!![" · "]") <|
(Std.Format.joinSep · (";" ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange m).map fun i =>
Std.Format.fill <| -- wrap line in a single place rather than all at once
(Std.Format.joinSep · ("," ++ Std.Format.line)) <|
(List.finRange n).map fun j => _root_.repr (f i j)
@[simp]
theorem cons_val' (v : n' → α) (B : Fin m → n' → α) (i j) :
vecCons v B i j = vecCons (v j) (fun i => B i j) i := by refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') : (vecHead fun i => B i j) = vecHead B j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val' (B : Fin m.succ → n' → α) (j : n') :
(vecTail fun i => B i j) = fun i => vecTail B i j := rfl
section DotProduct
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_empty (v w : Fin 0 → α) : dotProduct v w = 0 :=
Finset.sum_empty
@[simp]
theorem cons_dotProduct (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : Fin n.succ → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) w = x * vecHead w + dotProduct v (vecTail w) := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
@[simp]
theorem dotProduct_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct v (vecCons x w) = vecHead v * x + dotProduct (vecTail v) w := by
simp [dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, vecHead, vecTail]
theorem cons_dotProduct_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (y : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
dotProduct (vecCons x v) (vecCons y w) = x * y + dotProduct v w := by simp
end DotProduct
section ColRow
variable {ι : Type*}
@[simp]
theorem replicateCol_empty (v : Fin 0 → α) : replicateCol ι v = vecEmpty :=
empty_eq _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_empty := replicateCol_empty
@[simp]
theorem replicateCol_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
replicateCol ι (vecCons x u) = of (vecCons (fun _ => x) (replicateCol ι u)) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [vecHead, vecTail]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias col_cons := replicateCol_cons
@[simp]
theorem replicateRow_empty : replicateRow ι (vecEmpty : Fin 0 → α) = of fun _ => vecEmpty := rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias row_empty := replicateRow_empty
@[simp]
theorem replicateRow_cons (x : α) (u : Fin m → α) :
replicateRow ι (vecCons x u) = of fun _ => vecCons x u :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-20")] alias row_cons := replicateRow_cons
end ColRow
section Transpose
@[simp]
theorem transpose_empty_rows (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) : Aᵀ = of ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem transpose_empty_cols (A : Matrix (Fin 0) m' α) : Aᵀ = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_transpose (v : n' → α) (A : Matrix (Fin m) n' α) :
(of (vecCons v A))ᵀ = of fun i => vecCons (v i) (Aᵀ i) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ j <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem head_transpose (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) :
vecHead (of.symm Aᵀ) = vecHead ∘ of.symm A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_transpose (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) : vecTail (of.symm Aᵀ) = (vecTail ∘ A)ᵀ := by
ext i j
rfl
end Transpose
section Mul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_mul [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin 0) n' α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) : A * B = of ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem empty_mul_empty (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) (B : Matrix (Fin 0) o' α) : A * B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mul_empty [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix m' n' α) (B : Matrix n' (Fin 0) α) :
A * B = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
theorem mul_val_succ [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin m.succ) n' α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) (i : Fin m)
(j : o') : (A * B) i.succ j = (of (vecTail (of.symm A)) * B) i j :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_mul [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) (B : Matrix n' o' α) :
of (vecCons v A) * B = of (vecCons (v ᵥ* B) (of.symm (of A * B))) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i
· rfl
simp [mul_val_succ]
end Mul
section VecMul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecMul (v : Fin 0 → α) (B : Matrix (Fin 0) o' α) : v ᵥ* B = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem vecMul_empty [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (B : Matrix n' (Fin 0) α) : v ᵥ* B = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecMul (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (B : Fin n.succ → o' → α) :
vecCons x v ᵥ* of B = x • vecHead B + v ᵥ* of (vecTail B) := by
ext i
simp [vecMul]
@[simp]
theorem vecMul_cons (v : Fin n.succ → α) (w : o' → α) (B : Fin n → o' → α) :
v ᵥ* of (vecCons w B) = vecHead v • w + vecTail v ᵥ* of B := by
ext i
simp [vecMul]
theorem cons_vecMul_cons (x : α) (v : Fin n → α) (w : o' → α) (B : Fin n → o' → α) :
vecCons x v ᵥ* of (vecCons w B) = x • w + v ᵥ* of B := by simp
end VecMul
section MulVec
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_mulVec [Fintype n'] (A : Matrix (Fin 0) n' α) (v : n' → α) : A *ᵥ v = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_empty (A : Matrix m' (Fin 0) α) (v : Fin 0 → α) : A *ᵥ v = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem cons_mulVec [Fintype n'] (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) (w : n' → α) :
(of <| vecCons v A) *ᵥ w = vecCons (dotProduct v w) (of A *ᵥ w) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [mulVec]
@[simp]
theorem mulVec_cons {α} [NonUnitalCommSemiring α] (A : m' → Fin n.succ → α) (x : α)
(v : Fin n → α) : (of A) *ᵥ (vecCons x v) = x • vecHead ∘ A + (of (vecTail ∘ A)) *ᵥ v := by
ext i
simp [mulVec, mul_comm]
end MulVec
section VecMulVec
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
@[simp]
theorem empty_vecMulVec (v : Fin 0 → α) (w : n' → α) : vecMulVec v w = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem vecMulVec_empty (v : m' → α) (w : Fin 0 → α) : vecMulVec v w = of fun _ => ![] :=
funext fun _ => empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem cons_vecMulVec (x : α) (v : Fin m → α) (w : n' → α) :
vecMulVec (vecCons x v) w = vecCons (x • w) (vecMulVec v w) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [vecMulVec]
@[simp]
theorem vecMulVec_cons (v : m' → α) (x : α) (w : Fin n → α) :
vecMulVec v (vecCons x w) = of fun i => v i • vecCons x w := rfl
end VecMulVec
section SMul
variable [NonUnitalNonAssocSemiring α]
theorem smul_mat_empty {m' : Type*} (x : α) (A : Fin 0 → m' → α) : x • A = ![] :=
empty_eq _
theorem smul_mat_cons (x : α) (v : n' → α) (A : Fin m → n' → α) :
x • vecCons v A = vecCons (x • v) (x • A) := by
ext i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp
end SMul
section Submatrix
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_empty (A : Matrix m' n' α) (row : Fin 0 → m') (col : o' → n') :
submatrix A row col = ![] :=
empty_eq _
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_cons_row (A : Matrix m' n' α) (i : m') (row : Fin m → m') (col : o' → n') :
submatrix A (vecCons i row) col = vecCons (fun j => A i (col j)) (submatrix A row col) := by
ext i j
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_ i <;> simp [submatrix]
/-- Updating a row then removing it is the same as removing it. -/
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_updateRow_succAbove (A : Matrix (Fin m.succ) n' α) (v : n' → α) (f : o' → n')
(i : Fin m.succ) : (A.updateRow i v).submatrix i.succAbove f = A.submatrix i.succAbove f :=
ext fun r s => (congr_fun (updateRow_ne (Fin.succAbove_ne i r) : _ = A _) (f s) :)
/-- Updating a column then removing it is the same as removing it. -/
@[simp]
theorem submatrix_updateCol_succAbove (A : Matrix m' (Fin n.succ) α) (v : m' → α) (f : o' → m')
(i : Fin n.succ) : (A.updateCol i v).submatrix f i.succAbove = A.submatrix f i.succAbove :=
ext fun _r s => updateCol_ne (Fin.succAbove_ne i s)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-11")]
alias submatrix_updateColumn_succAbove := submatrix_updateCol_succAbove
end Submatrix
section Vec2AndVec3
section One
variable [Zero α] [One α]
theorem one_fin_two : (1 : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) = !![1, 0; 0, 1] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem one_fin_three : (1 : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) = !![1, 0, 0; 0, 1, 0; 0, 0, 1] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
end One
section AddMonoidWithOne
variable [AddMonoidWithOne α]
theorem natCast_fin_two (n : ℕ) : (n : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) = !![↑n, 0; 0, ↑n] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem natCast_fin_three (n : ℕ) :
(n : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) = !![↑n, 0, 0; 0, ↑n, 0; 0, 0, ↑n] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem ofNat_fin_two (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) =
!![ofNat(n), 0; 0, ofNat(n)] :=
natCast_fin_two _
theorem ofNat_fin_three (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
(ofNat(n) : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) =
!![ofNat(n), 0, 0; 0, ofNat(n), 0; 0, 0, ofNat(n)] :=
natCast_fin_three _
end AddMonoidWithOne
theorem eta_fin_two (A : Matrix (Fin 2) (Fin 2) α) : A = !![A 0 0, A 0 1; A 1 0, A 1 1] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem eta_fin_three (A : Matrix (Fin 3) (Fin 3) α) :
A = !![A 0 0, A 0 1, A 0 2;
A 1 0, A 1 1, A 1 2;
A 2 0, A 2 1, A 2 2] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> rfl
theorem mul_fin_two [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α] (a₁₁ a₁₂ a₂₁ a₂₂ b₁₁ b₁₂ b₂₁ b₂₂ : α) :
!![a₁₁, a₁₂;
a₂₁, a₂₂] * !![b₁₁, b₁₂;
b₂₁, b₂₂] = !![a₁₁ * b₁₁ + a₁₂ * b₂₁, a₁₁ * b₁₂ + a₁₂ * b₂₂;
a₂₁ * b₁₁ + a₂₂ * b₂₁, a₂₁ * b₁₂ + a₂₂ * b₂₂] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j <;> simp [Matrix.mul_apply, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
theorem mul_fin_three [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
(a₁₁ a₁₂ a₁₃ a₂₁ a₂₂ a₂₃ a₃₁ a₃₂ a₃₃ b₁₁ b₁₂ b₁₃ b₂₁ b₂₂ b₂₃ b₃₁ b₃₂ b₃₃ : α) :
!![a₁₁, a₁₂, a₁₃;
a₂₁, a₂₂, a₂₃;
a₃₁, a₃₂, a₃₃] * !![b₁₁, b₁₂, b₁₃;
b₂₁, b₂₂, b₂₃;
b₃₁, b₃₂, b₃₃] =
!![a₁₁*b₁₁ + a₁₂*b₂₁ + a₁₃*b₃₁, a₁₁*b₁₂ + a₁₂*b₂₂ + a₁₃*b₃₂, a₁₁*b₁₃ + a₁₂*b₂₃ + a₁₃*b₃₃;
a₂₁*b₁₁ + a₂₂*b₂₁ + a₂₃*b₃₁, a₂₁*b₁₂ + a₂₂*b₂₂ + a₂₃*b₃₂, a₂₁*b₁₃ + a₂₂*b₂₃ + a₂₃*b₃₃;
a₃₁*b₁₁ + a₃₂*b₂₁ + a₃₃*b₃₁, a₃₁*b₁₂ + a₃₂*b₂₂ + a₃₃*b₃₂, a₃₁*b₁₃ + a₃₂*b₂₃ + a₃₃*b₃₃] := by
ext i j
fin_cases i <;> fin_cases j
<;> simp [Matrix.mul_apply, dotProduct, Fin.sum_univ_succ, ← add_assoc]
theorem vec2_eq {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) : ![a₀, a₁] = ![b₀, b₁] := by
subst_vars
rfl
theorem vec3_eq {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} (h₀ : a₀ = b₀) (h₁ : a₁ = b₁) (h₂ : a₂ = b₂) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![b₀, b₁, b₂] := by
subst_vars
rfl
theorem vec2_add [Add α] (a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α) : ![a₀, a₁] + ![b₀, b₁] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁] := by
rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
theorem vec3_add [Add α] (a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α) :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] + ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = ![a₀ + b₀, a₁ + b₁, a₂ + b₂] := by
rw [cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, cons_add_cons, empty_add_empty]
theorem smul_vec2 {R : Type*} [SMul R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁] := by rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
theorem smul_vec3 {R : Type*} [SMul R α] (x : R) (a₀ a₁ a₂ : α) :
x • ![a₀, a₁, a₂] = ![x • a₀, x • a₁, x • a₂] := by
rw [smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_cons, smul_empty]
variable [AddCommMonoid α] [Mul α]
theorem vec2_dotProduct' {a₀ a₁ b₀ b₁ : α} : ![a₀, a₁] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ := by
rw [cons_dotProduct_cons, cons_dotProduct_cons, dotProduct_empty, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem vec2_dotProduct (v w : Fin 2 → α) : v ⬝ᵥ w = v 0 * w 0 + v 1 * w 1 :=
vec2_dotProduct'
| Mathlib/Data/Matrix/Notation.lean | 514 | 516 | theorem vec3_dotProduct' {a₀ a₁ a₂ b₀ b₁ b₂ : α} :
![a₀, a₁, a₂] ⬝ᵥ ![b₀, b₁, b₂] = a₀ * b₀ + a₁ * b₁ + a₂ * b₂ := by | rw [cons_dotProduct_cons, cons_dotProduct_cons, cons_dotProduct_cons, dotProduct_empty, |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Grade
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Powerset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Intervals of finsets as finsets
This file provides the `LocallyFiniteOrder` instance for `Finset α` and calculates the cardinality
of finite intervals of finsets.
If `s t : Finset α`, then `Finset.Icc s t` is the finset of finsets which include `s` and are
included in `t`. For example,
`Finset.Icc {0, 1} {0, 1, 2, 3} = {{0, 1}, {0, 1, 2}, {0, 1, 3}, {0, 1, 2, 3}}`
and
`Finset.Icc {0, 1, 2} {0, 1, 3} = {}`.
In addition, this file gives characterizations of monotone and strictly monotone functions
out of `Finset α` in terms of `Finset.insert`
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Finset
section Decidable
variable [DecidableEq α] (s t : Finset α)
instance instLocallyFiniteOrder : LocallyFiniteOrder (Finset α) where
finsetIcc s t := {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊆ u}
finsetIco s t := {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊆ u}
finsetIoc s t := {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊂ u}
finsetIoo s t := {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊂ u}
finset_mem_Icc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ico s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioc s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_powerset]
exact and_comm
finset_mem_Ioo s t u := by
rw [mem_filter, mem_ssubsets]
exact and_comm
theorem Icc_eq_filter_powerset : Icc s t = {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊆ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ico_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ico s t = {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊆ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ioc_eq_filter_powerset : Ioc s t = {u ∈ t.powerset | s ⊂ u} :=
rfl
theorem Ioo_eq_filter_ssubsets : Ioo s t = {u ∈ t.ssubsets | s ⊂ u} :=
rfl
theorem Iic_eq_powerset : Iic s = s.powerset :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
theorem Iio_eq_ssubsets : Iio s = s.ssubsets :=
filter_true_of_mem fun t _ => empty_subset t
variable {s t}
theorem Icc_eq_image_powerset (h : s ⊆ t) : Icc s t = (t \ s).powerset.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Icc, mem_image, mem_powerset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_le_sdiff_right ht, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, union_subset h <| hv.trans sdiff_subset⟩
theorem Ico_eq_image_ssubsets (h : s ⊆ t) : Ico s t = (t \ s).ssubsets.image (s ∪ ·) := by
ext u
simp_rw [mem_Ico, mem_image, mem_ssubsets]
constructor
· rintro ⟨hs, ht⟩
exact ⟨u \ s, sdiff_lt_sdiff_right ht hs, sup_sdiff_cancel_right hs⟩
· rintro ⟨v, hv, rfl⟩
exact ⟨le_sup_left, sup_lt_of_lt_sdiff_left hv h⟩
/-- Cardinality of a non-empty `Icc` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Icc_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Icc s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) := by
rw [← card_sdiff h, ← card_powerset, Icc_eq_image_powerset h, Finset.card_image_iff]
rintro u hu v hv (huv : s ⊔ u = s ⊔ v)
rw [mem_coe, mem_powerset] at hu hv
rw [← (disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hu : Disjoint s u).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, ←
(disjoint_sdiff.mono_right hv : Disjoint s v).sup_sdiff_cancel_left, huv]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ico` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ico_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ico s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 1 := by
rw [card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc_finset h]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ioc` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ioc_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ioc s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 1 := by
rw [card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one, card_Icc_finset h]
/-- Cardinality of an `Ioo` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Ioo_finset (h : s ⊆ t) : (Ioo s t).card = 2 ^ (t.card - s.card) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two, card_Icc_finset h]
/-- Cardinality of an `Iic` of finsets. -/
theorem card_Iic_finset : (Iic s).card = 2 ^ s.card := by rw [Iic_eq_powerset, card_powerset]
/-- Cardinality of an `Iio` of finsets. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Interval.lean | 115 | 116 | theorem card_Iio_finset : (Iio s).card = 2 ^ s.card - 1 := by | rw [Iio_eq_ssubsets, ssubsets, card_erase_of_mem (mem_powerset_self _), card_powerset] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
## Basic properties of `C^n` functions between manifolds
In this file, we show that standard operations on `C^n` maps between manifolds are `C^n` :
* `ContMDiffOn.comp` gives the invariance of the `Cⁿ` property under composition
* `contMDiff_id` gives the smoothness of the identity
* `contMDiff_const` gives the smoothness of constant functions
* `contMDiff_inclusion` shows that the inclusion between open sets of a topological space is `C^n`
* `contMDiff_isOpenEmbedding` shows that if `M` has a `ChartedSpace` structure induced by an open
embedding `e : M → H`, then `e` is `C^n`.
## Tags
chain rule, manifolds, higher derivative
-/
open Filter Function Set Topology
open scoped Manifold ContDiff
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
-- declare the prerequisites for a charted space `M` over the pair `(E, H)`.
{E : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H]
{I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M]
-- declare the prerequisites for a charted space `M'` over the pair `(E', H')`.
{E' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M']
-- declare the prerequisites for a charted space `M''` over the pair `(E'', H'')`.
{E'' : Type*}
[NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] {H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'']
{I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''} {M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'']
section ChartedSpace
variable [ChartedSpace H M] [ChartedSpace H' M'] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
-- declare functions, sets, points and smoothness indices
{f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} {n : WithTop ℕ∞}
/-! ### Regularity of the composition of `C^n` functions between manifolds -/
section Composition
/-- The composition of `C^n` functions within domains at points is `C^n`. -/
theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.comp {t : Set M'} {g : M' → M''} (x : M)
(hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I'' n g t (f x)) (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(st : MapsTo f s t) : ContMDiffWithinAt I I'' n (g ∘ f) s x := by
rw [contMDiffWithinAt_iff] at hg hf ⊢
refine ⟨hg.1.comp hf.1 st, ?_⟩
set e := extChartAt I x
set e' := extChartAt I' (f x)
have : e' (f x) = (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f) (e x) := by simp only [e, e', mfld_simps]
rw [this] at hg
have A : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[e.symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I] e x, f (e.symm y) ∈ t ∧ f (e.symm y) ∈ e'.source := by
simp only [e, ← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin, eventually_map]
filter_upwards [hf.1.tendsto (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (I := I') (f x)),
inter_mem_nhdsWithin s (extChartAt_source_mem_nhds (I := I) x)]
rintro x' (hfx' : f x' ∈ e'.source) ⟨hx's, hx'⟩
simp only [e, e.map_source hx', true_and, e.left_inv hx', st hx's, *]
refine ((hg.2.comp _ (hf.2.mono inter_subset_right)
((mapsTo_preimage _ _).mono_left inter_subset_left)).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
(inter_mem ?_ self_mem_nhdsWithin)).congr_of_eventuallyEq ?_ ?_
· filter_upwards [A]
rintro x' ⟨ht, hfx'⟩
simp only [*, e, e',mem_preimage, writtenInExtChartAt, (· ∘ ·), mem_inter_iff, e'.left_inv,
true_and]
exact mem_range_self _
· filter_upwards [A]
rintro x' ⟨-, hfx'⟩
simp only [*, e, e', (· ∘ ·), writtenInExtChartAt, e'.left_inv]
· simp only [e, e', writtenInExtChartAt, (· ∘ ·), mem_extChartAt_source,
e.left_inv, e'.left_inv]
/-- See note [comp_of_eq lemmas] -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/ContMDiff/Basic.lean | 81 | 84 | theorem ContMDiffWithinAt.comp_of_eq {t : Set M'} {g : M' → M''} {x : M} {y : M'}
(hg : ContMDiffWithinAt I' I'' n g t y) (hf : ContMDiffWithinAt I I' n f s x)
(st : MapsTo f s t) (hx : f x = y) : ContMDiffWithinAt I I'' n (g ∘ f) s x := by | subst hx; exact hg.comp x hf st |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Birkhoff sums
In this file we define `birkhoffSum f g n x` to be the sum `∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, g (f^[k] x)`.
This sum (more precisely, the corresponding average `n⁻¹ • birkhoffSum f g n x`)
appears in various ergodic theorems
saying that these averages converge to the "space average" `⨍ x, g x ∂μ` in some sense.
See also `birkhoffAverage` defined in `Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Average`.
-/
open Finset Function
section AddCommMonoid
variable {α M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M]
/-- The sum of values of `g` on the first `n` points of the orbit of `x` under `f`. -/
def birkhoffSum (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : M := ∑ k ∈ range n, g (f^[k] x)
theorem birkhoffSum_zero (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 0 x = 0 :=
sum_range_zero _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_zero' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 0 = 0 :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_zero _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_one (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 1 x = g x :=
sum_range_one _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_one' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 1 = g :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_one f g
theorem birkhoffSum_succ (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = birkhoffSum f g n x + g (f^[n] x) :=
sum_range_succ _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_succ' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = g x + birkhoffSum f g n (f x) :=
(sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
| Mathlib/Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Basic.lean | 51 | 53 | theorem birkhoffSum_add (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (m n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (m + n) x = birkhoffSum f g m x + birkhoffSum f g n (f^[m] x) := by | simp_rw [birkhoffSum, sum_range_add, add_comm m, iterate_add_apply] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Equiv.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.ENat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Part
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
/-!
# Natural numbers with infinity
The natural numbers and an extra `top` element `⊤`. This implementation uses `Part ℕ` as an
implementation. Use `ℕ∞` instead unless you care about computability.
## Main definitions
The following instances are defined:
* `OrderedAddCommMonoid PartENat`
* `CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat`
* `CompleteLinearOrder PartENat`
There is no additive analogue of `MonoidWithZero`; if there were then `PartENat` could
be an `AddMonoidWithTop`.
* `toWithTop` : the map from `PartENat` to `ℕ∞`, with theorems that it plays well
with `+` and `≤`.
* `withTopAddEquiv : PartENat ≃+ ℕ∞`
* `withTopOrderIso : PartENat ≃o ℕ∞`
## Implementation details
`PartENat` is defined to be `Part ℕ`.
`+` and `≤` are defined on `PartENat`, but there is an issue with `*` because it's not
clear what `0 * ⊤` should be. `mul` is hence left undefined. Similarly `⊤ - ⊤` is ambiguous
so there is no `-` defined on `PartENat`.
Before the `open scoped Classical` line, various proofs are made with decidability assumptions.
This can cause issues -- see for example the non-simp lemma `toWithTopZero` proved by `rfl`,
followed by `@[simp] lemma toWithTopZero'` whose proof uses `convert`.
## Tags
PartENat, ℕ∞
-/
open Part hiding some
/-- Type of natural numbers with infinity (`⊤`) -/
def PartENat : Type :=
Part ℕ
namespace PartENat
/-- The computable embedding `ℕ → PartENat`.
This coincides with the coercion `coe : ℕ → PartENat`, see `PartENat.some_eq_natCast`. -/
@[coe]
def some : ℕ → PartENat :=
Part.some
instance : Zero PartENat :=
⟨some 0⟩
instance : Inhabited PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One PartENat :=
⟨some 1⟩
instance : Add PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => get x h.1 + get y h.2⟩⟩
instance (n : ℕ) : Decidable (some n).Dom :=
isTrue trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_some (x : ℕ) : (some x).Dom :=
trivial
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid PartENat where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
add_comm _ _ := Part.ext' and_comm fun _ _ => add_comm _ _
zero_add _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)) fun _ _ => zero_add _
add_zero _ := Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (and_true _)) fun _ _ => add_zero _
add_assoc _ _ _ := Part.ext' and_assoc fun _ _ => add_assoc _ _ _
nsmul := nsmulRec
instance : AddCommMonoidWithOne PartENat :=
{ PartENat.addCommMonoid with
one := 1
natCast := some
natCast_zero := rfl
natCast_succ := fun _ => Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (true_and _)).symm fun _ _ => rfl }
theorem some_eq_natCast (n : ℕ) : some n = n :=
rfl
instance : CharZero PartENat where
cast_injective := Part.some_injective
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_inj` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem natCast_inj {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) = y ↔ x = y :=
Nat.cast_inj
@[simp]
theorem dom_natCast (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_ofNat (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_zero : (0 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
@[simp]
theorem dom_one : (1 : PartENat).Dom :=
trivial
instance : CanLift PartENat ℕ (↑) Dom :=
⟨fun n hn => ⟨n.get hn, Part.some_get _⟩⟩
instance : LE PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy⟩
instance : Top PartENat :=
⟨none⟩
instance : Bot PartENat :=
⟨0⟩
instance : Max PartENat :=
⟨fun x y => ⟨x.Dom ∧ y.Dom, fun h => x.get h.1 ⊔ y.get h.2⟩⟩
theorem le_def (x y : PartENat) :
x ≤ y ↔ ∃ h : y.Dom → x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get (h hy) ≤ y.get hy :=
Iff.rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn' {P : PartENat → Prop} :
∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P (some n)) → P a :=
Part.induction_on
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem casesOn {P : PartENat → Prop} : ∀ a : PartENat, P ⊤ → (∀ n : ℕ, P n) → P a := by
exact PartENat.casesOn'
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem top_add (x : PartENat) : ⊤ + x = ⊤ :=
Part.ext' (iff_of_eq (false_and _)) fun h => h.left.elim
-- not a simp lemma as we will provide a `LinearOrderedAddCommMonoidWithTop` instance later
theorem add_top (x : PartENat) : x + ⊤ = ⊤ := by rw [add_comm, top_add]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_get {x : PartENat} (h : x.Dom) : (x.get h : PartENat) = x := by
exact Part.ext' (iff_of_true trivial h) fun _ _ => rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem get_natCast' (x : ℕ) (h : (x : PartENat).Dom) : get (x : PartENat) h = x := by
rw [← natCast_inj, natCast_get]
theorem get_natCast {x : ℕ} : get (x : PartENat) (dom_natCast x) = x :=
get_natCast' _ _
theorem coe_add_get {x : ℕ} {y : PartENat} (h : ((x : PartENat) + y).Dom) :
get ((x : PartENat) + y) h = x + get y h.2 := by
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_add {x y : PartENat} (h : (x + y).Dom) : get (x + y) h = x.get h.1 + y.get h.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_zero (h : (0 : PartENat).Dom) : (0 : PartENat).get h = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_one (h : (1 : PartENat).Dom) : (1 : PartENat).get h = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofNat' (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] (h : (ofNat(x) : PartENat).Dom) :
Part.get (ofNat(x) : PartENat) h = ofNat(x) :=
get_natCast' x h
nonrec theorem get_eq_iff_eq_some {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = some b :=
get_eq_iff_eq_some
theorem get_eq_iff_eq_coe {a : PartENat} {ha : a.Dom} {b : ℕ} : a.get ha = b ↔ a = b := by
rw [get_eq_iff_eq_some]
rfl
theorem dom_of_le_of_dom {x y : PartENat} : x ≤ y → y.Dom → x.Dom := fun ⟨h, _⟩ => h
theorem dom_of_le_some {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ some y) : x.Dom :=
dom_of_le_of_dom h trivial
theorem dom_of_le_natCast {x : PartENat} {y : ℕ} (h : x ≤ y) : x.Dom := by
exact dom_of_le_some h
instance decidableLe (x y : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] [Decidable y.Dom] : Decidable (x ≤ y) :=
if hx : x.Dom then
decidable_of_decidable_of_iff (le_def x y).symm
else
if hy : y.Dom then isFalse fun h => hx <| dom_of_le_of_dom h hy
else isTrue ⟨fun h => (hy h).elim, fun h => (hy h).elim⟩
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder PartENat where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl _ := ⟨id, fun _ => le_rfl⟩
le_trans := fun _ _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyz₁, hyz₂⟩ =>
⟨hxy₁ ∘ hyz₁, fun _ => le_trans (hxy₂ _) (hyz₂ _)⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le _ _ := Iff.rfl
le_antisymm := fun _ _ ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ ⟨hyx₁, hyx₂⟩ =>
Part.ext' ⟨hyx₁, hxy₁⟩ fun _ _ => le_antisymm (hxy₂ _) (hyx₂ _)
theorem lt_def (x y : PartENat) : x < y ↔ ∃ hx : x.Dom, ∀ hy : y.Dom, x.get hx < y.get hy := by
rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, le_def, le_def, not_exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨hyx, H⟩, h⟩
by_cases hx : x.Dom
· use hx
intro hy
specialize H hy
specialize h fun _ => hy
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
rw [not_le] at h
exact h
· specialize h fun hx' => (hx hx').elim
rw [not_forall] at h
obtain ⟨hx', h⟩ := h
exact (hx hx').elim
· rintro ⟨hx, H⟩
exact ⟨⟨fun _ => hx, fun hy => (H hy).le⟩, fun hxy h => not_lt_of_le (h _) (H _)⟩
noncomputable instance isOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid PartENat :=
{ add_le_add_left := fun a b ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ c =>
PartENat.casesOn c (by simp [top_add]) fun c =>
⟨fun h => And.intro (dom_natCast _) (h₁ h.2), fun h => by
simpa only [coe_add_get] using add_le_add_left (h₂ _) c⟩ }
instance semilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => ⟨And.left, fun _ => le_sup_left⟩
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => ⟨And.right, fun _ => le_sup_right⟩
sup_le := fun _ _ _ ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ =>
⟨fun hz => ⟨hx₁ hz, hy₁ hz⟩, fun _ => sup_le (hx₂ _) (hy₂ _)⟩ }
instance orderBot : OrderBot PartENat where
bot := ⊥
bot_le _ := ⟨fun _ => trivial, fun _ => Nat.zero_le _⟩
instance orderTop : OrderTop PartENat where
top := ⊤
le_top _ := ⟨fun h => False.elim h, fun hy => False.elim hy⟩
instance : ZeroLEOneClass PartENat where
zero_le_one := bot_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_le` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_le_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y := Nat.cast_le
/-- Alias of `Nat.cast_lt` specialized to `PartENat` -/
theorem coe_lt_coe {x y : ℕ} : (x : PartENat) < y ↔ x < y := Nat.cast_lt
@[simp]
theorem get_le_get {x y : PartENat} {hx : x.Dom} {hy : y.Dom} : x.get hx ≤ y.get hy ↔ x ≤ y := by
conv =>
lhs
rw [← coe_le_coe, natCast_get, natCast_get]
theorem le_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x ≤ n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n := by
show (∃ h : True → x.Dom, _) ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h ≤ n
simp only [forall_prop_of_true, dom_natCast, get_natCast']
theorem lt_coe_iff (x : PartENat) (n : ℕ) : x < n ↔ ∃ h : x.Dom, x.get h < n := by
simp only [lt_def, forall_prop_of_true, get_natCast', dom_natCast]
theorem coe_le_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) ≤ x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n ≤ x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [le_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
theorem coe_lt_iff (n : ℕ) (x : PartENat) : (n : PartENat) < x ↔ ∀ h : x.Dom, n < x.get h := by
rw [← some_eq_natCast]
simp only [lt_def, exists_prop_of_true, dom_some, forall_true_iff]
rfl
nonrec theorem eq_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x = 0 ↔ x ≤ 0 :=
eq_bot_iff
theorem ne_zero_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ 0 ↔ ⊥ < x :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.symm
theorem dom_of_lt {x y : PartENat} : x < y → x.Dom :=
PartENat.casesOn x not_top_lt fun _ _ => dom_natCast _
theorem top_eq_none : (⊤ : PartENat) = Part.none :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem natCast_lt_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
Ne.lt_top fun h => absurd (congr_arg Dom h) <| by simp only [dom_natCast]; exact true_ne_false
@[simp]
theorem zero_lt_top : (0 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_top : (1 : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_lt_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) < ⊤ :=
natCast_lt_top x
@[simp]
theorem natCast_ne_top (x : ℕ) : (x : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_top : (0 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 0
@[simp]
theorem one_ne_top : (1 : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top 1
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_ne_top (x : ℕ) [x.AtLeastTwo] : (ofNat(x) : PartENat) ≠ ⊤ :=
natCast_ne_top x
theorem not_isMax_natCast (x : ℕ) : ¬IsMax (x : PartENat) :=
not_isMax_of_lt (natCast_lt_top x)
theorem ne_top_iff {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, x = n := by
simpa only [← some_eq_natCast] using Part.ne_none_iff
theorem ne_top_iff_dom {x : PartENat} : x ≠ ⊤ ↔ x.Dom := by
classical exact not_iff_comm.1 Part.eq_none_iff'.symm
theorem not_dom_iff_eq_top {x : PartENat} : ¬x.Dom ↔ x = ⊤ :=
Iff.not_left ne_top_iff_dom.symm
theorem ne_top_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x ≠ ⊤ :=
ne_of_lt <| lt_of_lt_of_le h le_top
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_lt (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) < x := by
constructor
· rintro rfl n
exact natCast_lt_top _
· contrapose!
rw [ne_top_iff]
rintro ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact ⟨n, irrefl _⟩
theorem eq_top_iff_forall_le (x : PartENat) : x = ⊤ ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, (n : PartENat) ≤ x :=
(eq_top_iff_forall_lt x).trans
⟨fun h n => (h n).le, fun h n => lt_of_lt_of_le (coe_lt_coe.mpr n.lt_succ_self) (h (n + 1))⟩
theorem pos_iff_one_le {x : PartENat} : 0 < x ↔ 1 ≤ x :=
PartENat.casesOn x
(by simp only [le_top, natCast_lt_top, ← @Nat.cast_zero PartENat])
fun n => by
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, ← Nat.cast_one, PartENat.coe_lt_coe, PartENat.coe_le_coe]
rfl
instance isTotal : IsTotal PartENat (· ≤ ·) where
total x y :=
PartENat.casesOn (P := fun z => z ≤ y ∨ y ≤ z) x (Or.inr le_top)
(PartENat.casesOn y (fun _ => Or.inl le_top) fun x y =>
(le_total x y).elim (Or.inr ∘ coe_le_coe.2) (Or.inl ∘ coe_le_coe.2))
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.partialOrder with
le_total := IsTotal.total
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _
max := (· ⊔ ·)
max_def a b := congr_fun₂ (@sup_eq_maxDefault PartENat _ (_) _) _ _ }
instance boundedOrder : BoundedOrder PartENat :=
{ PartENat.orderTop, PartENat.orderBot with }
noncomputable instance lattice : Lattice PartENat :=
{ PartENat.semilatticeSup with
inf := min
inf_le_left := min_le_left
inf_le_right := min_le_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ => le_min }
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PartENat :=
{ le_self_add := fun a b =>
PartENat.casesOn b (le_top.trans_eq (add_top _).symm) fun _ =>
PartENat.casesOn a (top_add _).ge fun _ =>
(coe_le_coe.2 le_self_add).trans_eq (Nat.cast_add _ _)
exists_add_of_le := fun {a b} =>
PartENat.casesOn b (fun _ => ⟨⊤, (add_top _).symm⟩) fun b =>
PartENat.casesOn a (fun h => ((natCast_lt_top _).not_le h).elim) fun a h =>
⟨(b - a : ℕ), by
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj, add_comm, tsub_add_cancel_of_le (coe_le_coe.1 h)]⟩ }
theorem eq_natCast_sub_of_add_eq_natCast {x y : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (h : x + y = n) :
x = ↑(n - y.get (dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h))) := by
lift x to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_right le_rfl).trans_eq h)
lift y to ℕ using dom_of_le_natCast ((le_add_left le_rfl).trans_eq h)
rw [← Nat.cast_add, natCast_inj] at h
rw [get_natCast, natCast_inj, eq_tsub_of_add_eq h]
protected theorem add_lt_add_right {x y z : PartENat} (h : x < y) (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z := by
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hz with ⟨k, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
exact_mod_cast natCast_lt_top _
norm_cast at h
exact_mod_cast add_lt_add_right h _
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_right {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : x + z < y + z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_of_add_lt_add_right, fun h => PartENat.add_lt_add_right h hz⟩
protected theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {x y z : PartENat} (hz : z ≠ ⊤) : z + x < z + y ↔ x < y := by
rw [add_comm z, add_comm z, PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_right hz]
protected theorem lt_add_iff_pos_right {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + y ↔ 0 < y := by
conv_rhs => rw [← PartENat.add_lt_add_iff_left hx]
rw [add_zero]
theorem lt_add_one {x : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < x + 1 := by
rw [PartENat.lt_add_iff_pos_right hx]
norm_cast
theorem le_of_lt_add_one {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y + 1) : x ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.le_of_lt_succ (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {x y : PartENat} (h : x < y) : x + 1 ≤ y := by
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply le_top
rcases ne_top_iff.mp (ne_top_of_lt h) with ⟨m, rfl⟩
exact_mod_cast Nat.succ_le_of_lt (by norm_cast at h)
theorem add_one_le_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x + 1 ≤ y ↔ x < y := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, add_one_le_of_lt⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_of_succ_le (by norm_cast at h)
theorem coe_succ_le_iff {n : ℕ} {e : PartENat} : ↑n.succ ≤ e ↔ ↑n < e := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, add_one_le_iff_lt (natCast_ne_top n)]
theorem lt_add_one_iff_lt {x y : PartENat} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < y + 1 ↔ x ≤ y := by
refine ⟨le_of_lt_add_one, fun h => ?_⟩
rcases ne_top_iff.mp hx with ⟨m, rfl⟩
induction y using PartENat.casesOn
· rw [top_add]
apply natCast_lt_top
exact_mod_cast Nat.lt_succ_of_le (by norm_cast at h)
lemma lt_coe_succ_iff_le {x : PartENat} {n : ℕ} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) : x < n.succ ↔ x ≤ n := by
rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one n, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, lt_add_one_iff_lt hx]
theorem add_eq_top_iff {a b : PartENat} : a + b = ⊤ ↔ a = ⊤ ∨ b = ⊤ := by
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [top_add, add_top]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, PartENat.natCast_ne_top, forall_const, not_false_eq_true]
protected theorem add_right_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (hc : c ≠ ⊤) : a + c = b + c ↔ a = b := by
rcases ne_top_iff.1 hc with ⟨c, rfl⟩
refine PartENat.casesOn a ?_ ?_
<;> refine PartENat.casesOn b ?_ ?_
<;> simp [add_eq_top_iff, natCast_ne_top, @eq_comm _ (⊤ : PartENat), top_add]
simp only [← Nat.cast_add, add_left_cancel_iff, PartENat.natCast_inj, add_comm, forall_const]
protected theorem add_left_cancel_iff {a b c : PartENat} (ha : a ≠ ⊤) : a + b = a + c ↔ b = c := by
rw [add_comm a, add_comm a, PartENat.add_right_cancel_iff ha]
section WithTop
/-- Computably converts a `PartENat` to a `ℕ∞`. -/
def toWithTop (x : PartENat) [Decidable x.Dom] : ℕ∞ :=
x.toOption
theorem toWithTop_top :
have : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom := Part.noneDecidable
toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_top' {h : Decidable (⊤ : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop ⊤ = ⊤ := by
convert toWithTop_top
theorem toWithTop_zero :
have : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 0
toWithTop 0 = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_zero' {h : Decidable (0 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 0 = 0 := by
convert toWithTop_zero
theorem toWithTop_one :
have : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom := someDecidable 1
toWithTop 1 = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toWithTop_one' {h : Decidable (1 : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop 1 = 1 := by
convert toWithTop_one
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/PartENat.lean | 526 | 531 | theorem toWithTop_some (n : ℕ) : toWithTop (some n) = n :=
rfl
theorem toWithTop_natCast (n : ℕ) {_ : Decidable (n : PartENat).Dom} : toWithTop n = n := by | simp only [← toWithTop_some]
congr |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Coeff
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Basic
/-!
# Formal power series in one variable - Truncation
`PowerSeries.trunc n φ` truncates a (univariate) formal power series
to the polynomial that has the same coefficients as `φ`, for all `m < n`,
and `0` otherwise.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset (antidiagonal mem_antidiagonal)
namespace PowerSeries
open Finsupp (single)
variable {R : Type*}
section Trunc
variable [Semiring R]
open Finset Nat
/-- The `n`th truncation of a formal power series to a polynomial -/
def trunc (n : ℕ) (φ : R⟦X⟧) : R[X] :=
∑ m ∈ Ico 0 n, Polynomial.monomial m (coeff R m φ)
theorem coeff_trunc (m) (n) (φ : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n φ).coeff m = if m < n then coeff R m φ else 0 := by
simp [trunc, Polynomial.coeff_sum, Polynomial.coeff_monomial, Nat.lt_succ_iff]
@[simp]
theorem trunc_zero (n) : trunc n (0 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, LinearMap.map_zero, Polynomial.coeff_zero]
split_ifs <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_one (n) : trunc (n + 1) (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 1 :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_one, Polynomial.coeff_one]
split_ifs with h _ h'
· rfl
· rfl
· subst h'; simp at h
· rfl
@[simp]
theorem trunc_C (n) (a : R) : trunc (n + 1) (C R a) = Polynomial.C a :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_C, Polynomial.coeff_C]
split_ifs with H <;> first |rfl|try simp_all
@[simp]
theorem trunc_add (n) (φ ψ : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (φ + ψ) = trunc n φ + trunc n ψ :=
Polynomial.ext fun m => by
simp only [coeff_trunc, AddMonoidHom.map_add, Polynomial.coeff_add]
split_ifs with H
· rfl
· rw [zero_add]
theorem trunc_succ (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n.succ f = trunc n f + Polynomial.monomial n (coeff R n f) := by
rw [trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range, sum_range_succ, trunc, Ico_zero_eq_range]
theorem natDegree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc (n + 1) f).natDegree < n + 1 := by
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff, natDegree_le_iff_coeff_eq_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [lt_succ, ← not_lt] at h
contradiction
· rfl
@[simp] lemma trunc_zero' {f : R⟦X⟧} : trunc 0 f = 0 := rfl
theorem degree_trunc_lt (f : R⟦X⟧) (n) : (trunc n f).degree < n := by
rw [degree_lt_iff_coeff_zero]
intros
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [← not_le] at h
contradiction
· rfl
theorem eval₂_trunc_eq_sum_range {S : Type*} [Semiring S] (s : S) (G : R →+* S) (n) (f : R⟦X⟧) :
(trunc n f).eval₂ G s = ∑ i ∈ range n, G (coeff R i f) * s ^ i := by
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [trunc_zero', range_zero, sum_empty, eval₂_zero]
| succ n =>
have := natDegree_trunc_lt f n
rw [eval₂_eq_sum_range' (hn := this)]
apply sum_congr rfl
intro _ h
rw [mem_range] at h
congr
rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos h]
@[simp] theorem trunc_X (n) : trunc (n + 2) X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_X]
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rw [h₂, coeff_X_one]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one h₂]
· rw [coeff_X_of_ne_one]
intro hd
apply h₁
rw [hd]
exact n.one_lt_succ_succ
lemma trunc_X_of {n : ℕ} (hn : 2 ≤ n) : trunc n X = (Polynomial.X : R[X]) := by
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n =>
cases n with
| zero => contradiction
| succ n => exact trunc_X n
@[simp]
lemma trunc_one_left (p : R⟦X⟧) : trunc (R := R) 1 p = .C (coeff R 0 p) := by
ext i; simp +contextual [coeff_trunc, Polynomial.coeff_C]
lemma trunc_one_X : trunc (R := R) 1 X = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
lemma trunc_C_mul (n : ℕ) (r : R) (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n (C R r * f) = .C r * trunc n f := by
ext i; simp [coeff_trunc]
@[simp]
lemma trunc_mul_C (n : ℕ) (f : R⟦X⟧) (r : R) : trunc n (f * C R r) = trunc n f * .C r := by
ext i; simp [coeff_trunc]
end Trunc
section Trunc
/-
Lemmas in this section involve the coercion `R[X] → R⟦X⟧`, so they may only be stated in the case
`R` is commutative. This is because the coercion is an `R`-algebra map.
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
open Nat hiding pow_succ pow_zero
open Polynomial Finset Finset.Nat
theorem trunc_trunc_of_le {n m} (f : R⟦X⟧) (hnm : n ≤ m := by rfl) :
trunc n ↑(trunc m f) = trunc n f := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc, coeff_coe]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_trunc, if_pos <| lt_of_lt_of_le h hnm]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc {n} (f : R⟦X⟧) : trunc n ↑(trunc n f) = trunc n f :=
trunc_trunc_of_le f
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_mul {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n ((trunc n f) * g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
ext m
rw [coeff_trunc, coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· rw [coeff_mul, coeff_mul, sum_congr rfl]
intro _ hab
have ha := lt_of_le_of_lt (antidiagonal.fst_le hab) h
rw [coeff_coe, coeff_trunc, if_pos ha]
· rfl
@[simp] theorem trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (f * (trunc n g) : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by
rw [mul_comm, trunc_trunc_mul, mul_comm]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Trunc.lean | 184 | 191 | theorem trunc_trunc_mul_trunc {n} (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
trunc n (trunc n f * trunc n g : R⟦X⟧) = trunc n (f * g) := by | rw [trunc_trunc_mul, trunc_mul_trunc]
@[simp] theorem trunc_trunc_pow (f : R⟦X⟧) (n a : ℕ) :
trunc n ((trunc n f : R⟦X⟧) ^ a) = trunc n (f ^ a) := by
induction a with
| zero => |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Option
import Mathlib.Data.PFun
import Mathlib.Data.Part
/-!
# Image of a `Finset α` under a partially defined function
In this file we define `Part.toFinset` and `Finset.pimage`. We also prove some trivial lemmas about
these definitions.
## Tags
finite set, image, partial function
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace Part
/-- Convert an `o : Part α` with decidable `Part.Dom o` to `Finset α`. -/
def toFinset (o : Part α) [Decidable o.Dom] : Finset α :=
o.toOption.toFinset
@[simp]
theorem mem_toFinset {o : Part α} [Decidable o.Dom] {x : α} : x ∈ o.toFinset ↔ x ∈ o := by
simp [toFinset]
@[simp]
theorem toFinset_none [Decidable (none : Part α).Dom] : none.toFinset = (∅ : Finset α) := by
simp [toFinset]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/PImage.lean | 39 | 40 | theorem toFinset_some {a : α} [Decidable (some a).Dom] : (some a).toFinset = {a} := by | simp [toFinset] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.NormalMono.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
/-!
# Every NonPreadditiveAbelian category is preadditive
In mathlib, we define an abelian category as a preadditive category with a zero object,
kernels and cokernels, products and coproducts and in which every monomorphism and epimorphism is
normal.
While virtually every interesting abelian category has a natural preadditive structure (which is why
it is included in the definition), preadditivity is not actually needed: Every category that has
all of the other properties appearing in the definition of an abelian category admits a preadditive
structure. This is the construction we carry out in this file.
The proof proceeds in roughly five steps:
1. Prove some results (for example that all equalizers exist) that would be trivial if we already
had the preadditive structure but are a bit of work without it.
2. Develop images and coimages to show that every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel.
The results of the first two steps are also useful for the "normal" development of abelian
categories, and will be used there.
3. For every object `A`, define a "subtraction" morphism `σ : A ⨯ A ⟶ A` and use it to define
subtraction on morphisms as `f - g := prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
4. Prove a small number of identities about this subtraction from the definition of `σ`.
5. From these identities, prove a large number of other identities that imply that defining
`f + g := f - (0 - g)` indeed gives an abelian group structure on morphisms such that composition
is bilinear.
The construction is non-trivial and it is quite remarkable that this abelian group structure can
be constructed purely from the existence of a few limits and colimits. Even more remarkably,
since abelian categories admit exactly one preadditive structure (see
`subsingletonPreadditiveOfHasBinaryBiproducts`), the construction manages to exactly
reconstruct any natural preadditive structure the category may have.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
section
universe v u
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- We call a category `NonPreadditiveAbelian` if it has a zero object, kernels, cokernels, binary
products and coproducts, and every monomorphism and every epimorphism is normal. -/
class NonPreadditiveAbelian extends HasZeroMorphisms C, IsNormalMonoCategory C,
IsNormalEpiCategory C where
[has_zero_object : HasZeroObject C]
[has_kernels : HasKernels C]
[has_cokernels : HasCokernels C]
[has_finite_products : HasFiniteProducts C]
[has_finite_coproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_zero_object
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_kernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_cokernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_products
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_coproducts
end
end CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [NonPreadditiveAbelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory.NonPreadditiveAbelian
section Factor
variable {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q)
/-- The map `p : P ⟶ image f` is an epimorphism -/
instance : Epi (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
let I := Abelian.image f
let p := Abelian.factorThruImage f
let i := kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
-- It will suffice to consider some g : I ⟶ R such that p ≫ g = 0 and show that g = 0.
NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
_ fun R (g : I ⟶ R) (hpg : p ≫ g = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := ker g ≫ i is the kernel of some morphism h.
let u := kernel.ι g ≫ i
haveI hu := normalMonoOfMono u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, p factors through the kernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := kernel.lift' g p hpg
have fh : f ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
f ≫ h = (p ≫ i) ≫ h := (Abelian.image.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = ((t ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i) ≫ h := ht ▸ rfl
_ = t ≫ u ≫ h := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = t ≫ 0 := hu.w ▸ rfl
_ = 0 := HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero _ _
-- h factors through the cokernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := cokernel.desc' f h fh
have hih : i ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
i ≫ h = i ≫ cokernel.π f ≫ l := hl ▸ rfl
_ = 0 ≫ l := by rw [← Category.assoc, kernel.condition]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- i factors through u = ker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalMono.lift' u i hih
have hs' : (s ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i = 𝟙 I ≫ i := by rw [Category.assoc, hs, Category.id_comp]
haveI : Epi (kernel.ι g) := epi_of_epi_fac ((cancel_mono _).1 hs')
-- ker g is an epimorphism, but ker g ≫ g = 0 = ker g ≫ 0, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_epi_comp _ (kernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruImage [Mono f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi <| Abelian.factorThruImage f
/-- The canonical morphism `i : coimage f ⟶ Q` is a monomorphism -/
instance : Mono (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
let I := Abelian.coimage f
let i := Abelian.factorThruCoimage f
let p := cokernel.π (kernel.ι f)
NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero _ fun R (g : R ⟶ I) (hgi : g ≫ i = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := p ≫ coker g is the cokernel of some morphism h.
let u := p ≫ cokernel.π g
haveI hu := normalEpiOfEpi u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, i factors through the cokernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := cokernel.desc' g i hgi
have hf : h ≫ f = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ f = h ≫ p ≫ i := (Abelian.coimage.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ t := ht ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ u ≫ t := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = 0 ≫ t := by rw [← Category.assoc, hu.w]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- h factors through the kernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := kernel.lift' f h hf
have hhp : h ≫ p = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ p = (l ≫ kernel.ι f) ≫ p := hl ▸ rfl
_ = l ≫ 0 := by rw [Category.assoc, cokernel.condition]
_ = 0 := comp_zero
-- p factors through u = coker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalEpi.desc' u p hhp
have hs' : p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ s = p ≫ 𝟙 I := by rw [← Category.assoc, hs, Category.comp_id]
haveI : Mono (cokernel.π g) := mono_of_mono_fac ((cancel_epi _).1 hs')
-- coker g is a monomorphism, but g ≫ coker g = 0 = 0 ≫ coker g, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_comp_mono _ (cokernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruCoimage [Epi f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
end Factor
section CokernelOfKernel
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, an epi is the cokernel of its kernel. More precisely:
If `f` is an epimorphism and `s` is some limit kernel cone on `f`, then `f` is a cokernel
of `Fork.ι s`. -/
def epiIsCokernelOfKernel [Epi f] (s : Fork f 0) (h : IsLimit s) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ f (KernelFork.condition s)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _
(cokernel.ofIsoComp _ _ (Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h)
(ConeMorphism.w (Limits.IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) (Abelian.coimage.fac f)
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, a mono is the kernel of its cokernel. More precisely:
If `f` is a monomorphism and `s` is some colimit cokernel cocone on `f`, then `f` is a kernel
of `Cofork.π s`. -/
def monoIsKernelOfCokernel [Mono f] (s : Cofork f 0) (h : IsColimit s) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι f (CokernelCofork.condition s)) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _
(kernel.ofCompIso _ _ (Limits.IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso h (colimit.isColimit _))
(CoconeMorphism.w (Limits.IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso h <| colimit.isColimit _).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruImage f) (Abelian.image.fac f)
end CokernelOfKernel
section
/-- The composite `A ⟶ A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (Δ A)`, where the first map is `(𝟙 A, 0)` and the second map
is the canonical projection into the cokernel. -/
abbrev r (A : C) : A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) :=
prod.lift (𝟙 A) 0 ≫ cokernel.π (diag A)
instance mono_Δ {A : C} : Mono (diag A) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
instance mono_r {A : C} : Mono (r A) := by
let hl : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (diag A) (cokernel.condition (diag A))) :=
monoIsKernelOfCokernel _ (colimit.isColimit _)
apply NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro Z x hx
have hxx : (x ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) = 0 := by
rw [Category.assoc, hx]
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hl _ hxx
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι] at hy
have hyy : y = 0 := by
erw [← Category.comp_id y, ← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), ← Category.assoc, hy,
Category.assoc, prod.lift_snd, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
rw [← hy, hyy, zero_comp, zero_comp]
instance epi_r {A : C} : Epi (r A) := by
have hlp : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ Limits.prod.snd = 0 := prod.lift_snd _ _
let hp1 : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) hlp) := by
refine Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => Fork.ι s ≫ Limits.prod.fst) ?_ ?_
· intro s
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
· intro s m h
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
convert h
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
let hp2 : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.prod.snd : A ⨯ A ⟶ A) hlp) :=
epiIsCokernelOfKernel _ hp1
apply NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
intro Z z hz
have h : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ z = 0 := by rw [← Category.assoc, hz]
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hp2 _ h
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ] at ht
have htt : t = 0 := by
rw [← Category.id_comp t]
change 𝟙 A ≫ t = 0
rw [← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), Category.assoc, ht, ← Category.assoc,
cokernel.condition, zero_comp]
apply (cancel_epi (cokernel.π (diag A))).1
rw [← ht, htt, comp_zero, comp_zero]
instance isIso_r {A : C} : IsIso (r A) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
/-- The composite `A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) ⟶ A` given by the natural projection into the cokernel
followed by the inverse of `r`. In the category of modules, using the normal kernels and
cokernels, this map is equal to the map `(a, b) ↦ a - b`, hence the name `σ` for
"subtraction". -/
abbrev σ {A : C} : A ⨯ A ⟶ A :=
cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ inv (r A)
end
@[reassoc]
theorem diag_σ {X : C} : diag X ≫ σ = 0 := by rw [cokernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_σ {X : C} : prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ = 𝟙 X := by rw [← Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 := by simp
/-- σ is a cokernel of Δ X. -/
def isColimitσ {X : C} : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (σ : X ⨯ X ⟶ X) diag_σ) :=
cokernel.cokernelIso _ σ (asIso (r X)).symm (by rw [Iso.symm_hom, asIso_inv])
/-- This is the key identity satisfied by `σ`. -/
theorem σ_comp {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : σ ≫ f = Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' isColimitσ (Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ) (by
rw [prod.diag_map_assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero])
suffices hfg : f = g by rw [← hg, Cofork.π_ofπ, hfg]
calc
f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 ≫ σ := by rw [lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by rw [lift_map_assoc]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ ≫ g := by rw [← hg, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ]
_ = g := by rw [← Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.id_comp]
section
-- We write `f - g` for `prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
/-- Subtraction of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasSub {X Y : C} : Sub (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => prod.lift f g ≫ σ⟩
attribute [local instance] hasSub
-- We write `-f` for `0 - f`.
/-- Negation of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasNeg {X Y : C} : Neg (X ⟶ Y) where
neg := fun f => 0 - f
attribute [local instance] hasNeg
-- We write `f + g` for `f - (-g)`.
/-- Addition of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasAdd {X Y : C} : Add (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => f - -g⟩
attribute [local instance] hasAdd
theorem sub_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a - b = prod.lift a b ≫ σ := rfl
theorem add_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = a - -b := rfl
theorem neg_def {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a = 0 - a := rfl
theorem sub_zero {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - 0 = a := by
rw [sub_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; rw [← Category.comp_id a]
case a.g => rw [show 0 = a ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Y) by simp]
rw [← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
theorem sub_self {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - a = 0 := by
rw [sub_def, ← Category.comp_id a, ← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero]
theorem lift_sub_lift {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift a b - prod.lift c d = prod.lift (a - c) (b - d) := by
simp only [sub_def]
ext
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst]
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd]
theorem sub_sub_sub {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) : a - c - (b - d) = a - b - (c - d) := by
rw [sub_def, ← lift_sub_lift, sub_def, Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc]; rfl
theorem neg_sub {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -a - b = -b - a := by
conv_lhs => rw [neg_def, ← sub_zero b, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, ← neg_def]
theorem neg_neg {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : - -a = a := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [← sub_self a]
rw [sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem add_comm {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = b + a := by
rw [add_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← neg_neg a]
rw [neg_def, neg_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub]
conv_lhs =>
congr
next => skip
rw [← neg_def, neg_sub]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, ← neg_def, neg_neg b, neg_def]
theorem add_neg {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + -b = a - b := by rw [add_def, neg_neg]
theorem add_neg_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a + -a = 0 := by rw [add_neg, sub_self]
theorem neg_add_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a + a = 0 := by rw [add_comm, add_neg_cancel]
theorem neg_sub' {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -(a - b) = -a + b := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← sub_self (0 : X ⟶ Y)]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, neg_def]
theorem neg_add {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -(a + b) = -a - b := by rw [add_def, neg_sub', add_neg]
theorem sub_add {X Y : C} (a b c : X ⟶ Y) : a - b + c = a - (b - c) := by
rw [add_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero]
theorem add_assoc {X Y : C} (a b c : X ⟶ Y) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) := by
conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [add_def]
rw [sub_add, ← add_neg, neg_sub', neg_neg]
theorem add_zero {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a + 0 = a := by rw [add_def, neg_def, sub_self, sub_zero]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/NonPreadditive.lean | 385 | 393 | theorem comp_sub {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ (g - h) = f ≫ g - f ≫ h := by | rw [sub_def, ← Category.assoc, prod.comp_lift, sub_def]
theorem sub_comp {X Y Z : C} (f g : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y ⟶ Z) : (f - g) ≫ h = f ≫ h - g ≫ h := by
rw [sub_def, Category.assoc, σ_comp, ← Category.assoc, prod.lift_map, sub_def]
theorem comp_add (X Y Z : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (g h : Y ⟶ Z) : f ≫ (g + h) = f ≫ g + f ≫ h := by
rw [add_def, comp_sub, neg_def, comp_sub, comp_zero, add_def, neg_def] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 614 | 615 | theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Operations
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Lattice
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.NonUnitalSubsemiring.Basic
/-!
# More operations on modules and ideals
-/
assert_not_exists Basis -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Basis`
Submodule.hasQuotient -- See `RingTheory.Ideal.Quotient.Operations`
universe u v w x
open Pointwise
namespace Submodule
lemma coe_span_smul {R' M' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R' M']
(s : Set R') (N : Submodule R' M') :
(Ideal.span s : Set R') • N = s • N :=
set_smul_eq_of_le _ _ _
(by rintro r n hr hn
induction hr using Submodule.span_induction with
| mem _ h => exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem h hn
| zero => rw [zero_smul]; exact Submodule.zero_mem _
| add _ _ _ _ ihr ihs => rw [add_smul]; exact Submodule.add_mem _ ihr ihs
| smul _ _ hr =>
rw [mem_span_set] at hr
obtain ⟨c, hc, rfl⟩ := hr
rw [Finsupp.sum, Finset.smul_sum, Finset.sum_smul]
refine Submodule.sum_mem _ fun i hi => ?_
rw [← mul_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm, mul_smul]
exact mem_set_smul_of_mem_mem (hc hi) <| Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hn) <|
set_smul_mono_left _ Submodule.subset_span
lemma span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(span ℤ {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a := by
ext i
simp [Ideal.mem_span_singleton', AddSubgroup.mem_zmultiples_iff]
@[simp] lemma _root_.Ideal.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples (a : ℤ) :
(Ideal.span {a}).toAddSubgroup = AddSubgroup.zmultiples a :=
Submodule.span_singleton_toAddSubgroup_eq_zmultiples _
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {M' F G : Type*}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
/-- This duplicates the global `smul_eq_mul`, but doesn't have to unfold anywhere near as much to
apply. -/
protected theorem _root_.Ideal.smul_eq_mul (I J : Ideal R) : I • J = I * J :=
rfl
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N : Submodule R M}
theorem smul_le_right : I • N ≤ N :=
smul_le.2 fun r _ _ ↦ N.smul_mem r
theorem map_le_smul_top (I : Ideal R) (f : R →ₗ[R] M) :
Submodule.map f I ≤ I • (⊤ : Submodule R M) := by
rintro _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
rw [← mul_one y, ← smul_eq_mul, f.map_smul]
exact smul_mem_smul hy mem_top
variable (I J N)
@[simp]
theorem top_smul : (⊤ : Ideal R) • N = N :=
le_antisymm smul_le_right fun r hri => one_smul R r ▸ smul_mem_smul mem_top hri
protected theorem mul_smul : (I * J) • N = I • J • N :=
Submodule.smul_assoc _ _ _
theorem mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤) (x : M)
(H : ∀ r : s, (r : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
suffices LinearMap.range (LinearMap.toSpanSingleton R M x) ≤ M' by
rw [← LinearMap.toSpanSingleton_one R M x]
exact this (LinearMap.mem_range_self _ 1)
rw [LinearMap.range_eq_map, ← hs, map_le_iff_le_comap, Ideal.span, span_le]
exact fun r hr ↦ H ⟨r, hr⟩
variable {M' : Type w} [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
@[simp]
theorem map_smul'' (f : M →ₗ[R] M') : (I • N).map f = I • N.map f :=
le_antisymm
(map_le_iff_le_comap.2 <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr n hn =>
show f (r • n) ∈ I • N.map f from
(f.map_smul r n).symm ▸ smul_mem_smul hr (mem_map_of_mem hn)) <|
smul_le.2 fun r hr _ hn =>
let ⟨p, hp, hfp⟩ := mem_map.1 hn
hfp ▸ f.map_smul r p ▸ mem_map_of_mem (smul_mem_smul hr hp)
theorem mem_smul_top_iff (N : Submodule R M) (x : N) :
x ∈ I • (⊤ : Submodule R N) ↔ (x : M) ∈ I • N := by
have : Submodule.map N.subtype (I • ⊤) = I • N := by
rw [Submodule.map_smul'', Submodule.map_top, Submodule.range_subtype]
simp [← this, -map_smul'']
@[simp]
theorem smul_comap_le_comap_smul (f : M →ₗ[R] M') (S : Submodule R M') (I : Ideal R) :
I • S.comap f ≤ (I • S).comap f := by
refine Submodule.smul_le.mpr fun r hr x hx => ?_
rw [Submodule.mem_comap] at hx ⊢
rw [f.map_smul]
exact Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hx
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid M'] [Module R M']
open Pointwise
theorem mem_smul_span_singleton {I : Ideal R} {m : M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • span R ({m} : Set M) ↔ ∃ y ∈ I, y • m = x :=
⟨fun hx =>
smul_induction_on hx
(fun r hri _ hnm =>
let ⟨s, hs⟩ := mem_span_singleton.1 hnm
⟨r * s, I.mul_mem_right _ hri, hs ▸ mul_smul r s m⟩)
fun m1 m2 ⟨y1, hyi1, hy1⟩ ⟨y2, hyi2, hy2⟩ =>
⟨y1 + y2, I.add_mem hyi1 hyi2, by rw [add_smul, hy1, hy2]⟩,
fun ⟨_, hyi, hy⟩ => hy ▸ smul_mem_smul hyi (subset_span <| Set.mem_singleton m)⟩
variable {I J : Ideal R} {N P : Submodule R M}
variable (S : Set R) (T : Set M)
theorem smul_eq_map₂ : I • N = Submodule.map₂ (LinearMap.lsmul R M) I N :=
le_antisymm (smul_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ Submodule.apply_mem_map₂ _ hm)
(map₂_le.mpr fun _m hm _n ↦ smul_mem_smul hm)
theorem span_smul_span : Ideal.span S • span R T = span R (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s • t}) := by
rw [smul_eq_map₂]
exact (map₂_span_span _ _ _ _).trans <| congr_arg _ <| Set.image2_eq_iUnion _ _ _
theorem ideal_span_singleton_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) :
(Ideal.span {r} : Ideal R) • N = r • N := by
have : span R (⋃ (t : M) (_ : t ∈ N), {r • t}) = r • N := by
convert span_eq (r • N)
exact (Set.image_eq_iUnion _ (N : Set M)).symm
conv_lhs => rw [← span_eq N, span_smul_span]
simpa
/-- Given `s`, a generating set of `R`, to check that an `x : M` falls in a
submodule `M'` of `x`, we only need to show that `r ^ n • x ∈ M'` for some `n` for each `r : s`. -/
theorem mem_of_span_eq_top_of_smul_pow_mem (M' : Submodule R M) (s : Set R) (hs : Ideal.span s = ⊤)
(x : M) (H : ∀ r : s, ∃ n : ℕ, ((r : R) ^ n : R) • x ∈ M') : x ∈ M' := by
choose f hf using H
apply M'.mem_of_span_top_of_smul_mem _ (Ideal.span_range_pow_eq_top s hs f)
rintro ⟨_, r, hr, rfl⟩
exact hf r
open Pointwise in
@[simp]
theorem map_pointwise_smul (r : R) (N : Submodule R M) (f : M →ₗ[R] M') :
(r • N).map f = r • N.map f := by
simp_rw [← ideal_span_singleton_smul, map_smul'']
theorem mem_smul_span {s : Set M} {x : M} :
x ∈ I • Submodule.span R s ↔ x ∈ Submodule.span R (⋃ (a ∈ I) (b ∈ s), ({a • b} : Set M)) := by
rw [← I.span_eq, Submodule.span_smul_span, I.span_eq]
simp
variable (I)
/-- If `x` is an `I`-multiple of the submodule spanned by `f '' s`,
then we can write `x` as an `I`-linear combination of the elements of `f '' s`. -/
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum {ι : Type*} (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (Set.range f) ↔
∃ (a : ι →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
constructor; swap
· rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
exact Submodule.sum_mem _ fun c _ => smul_mem_smul (ha c) <| subset_span <| Set.mem_range_self _
refine fun hx => span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ (mem_smul_span.mp hx)
· simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, Set.mem_range, Set.mem_singleton_iff]
rintro x ⟨y, hy, x, ⟨i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Finsupp.single i y, fun j => ?_, ?_⟩
· letI := Classical.decEq ι
rw [Finsupp.single_apply]
split_ifs
· assumption
· exact I.zero_mem
refine @Finsupp.sum_single_index ι R M _ _ i _ (fun i y => y • f i) ?_
simp
· exact ⟨0, fun _ => I.zero_mem, Finsupp.sum_zero_index⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨ax, hax, rfl⟩ ⟨ay, hay, rfl⟩
refine ⟨ax + ay, fun i => I.add_mem (hax i) (hay i), Finsupp.sum_add_index' ?_ ?_⟩ <;>
intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, add_smul]
· rintro c x - ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
refine ⟨c • a, fun i => I.mul_mem_left c (ha i), ?_⟩
rw [Finsupp.sum_smul_index, Finsupp.smul_sum] <;> intros <;> simp only [zero_smul, mul_smul]
theorem mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum' {ι : Type*} (s : Set ι) (f : ι → M) (x : M) :
x ∈ I • span R (f '' s) ↔
∃ (a : s →₀ R) (_ : ∀ i, a i ∈ I), (a.sum fun i c => c • f i) = x := by
rw [← Submodule.mem_ideal_smul_span_iff_exists_sum, ← Set.image_eq_range]
end CommSemiring
end Submodule
namespace Ideal
section Add
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R]
@[simp]
theorem add_eq_sup {I J : Ideal R} : I + J = I ⊔ J :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_bot : (0 : Ideal R) = ⊥ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sum_eq_sup {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → Ideal R) : s.sum f = s.sup f :=
rfl
end Add
section Semiring
variable {R : Type u} [Semiring R] {I J K L : Ideal R}
@[simp]
theorem one_eq_top : (1 : Ideal R) = ⊤ := by
rw [Submodule.one_eq_span, ← Ideal.span, Ideal.span_singleton_one]
theorem add_eq_one_iff : I + J = 1 ↔ ∃ i ∈ I, ∃ j ∈ J, i + j = 1 := by
rw [one_eq_top, eq_top_iff_one, add_eq_sup, Submodule.mem_sup]
theorem mul_mem_mul {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : r * s ∈ I * J :=
Submodule.smul_mem_smul hr hs
theorem pow_mem_pow {x : R} (hx : x ∈ I) (n : ℕ) : x ^ n ∈ I ^ n :=
Submodule.pow_mem_pow _ hx _
theorem mul_le : I * J ≤ K ↔ ∀ r ∈ I, ∀ s ∈ J, r * s ∈ K :=
Submodule.smul_le
theorem mul_le_left : I * J ≤ J :=
mul_le.2 fun _ _ _ => J.mul_mem_left _
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_left_self : I ⊔ J * I = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_left
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_self_sup : J * I ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_left
theorem mul_le_right [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ≤ I :=
mul_le.2 fun _ hr _ _ ↦ I.mul_mem_right _ hr
@[simp]
theorem sup_mul_right_self [I.IsTwoSided] : I ⊔ I * J = I :=
sup_eq_left.2 mul_le_right
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_self_sup [I.IsTwoSided] : I * J ⊔ I = I :=
sup_eq_right.2 mul_le_right
protected theorem mul_assoc : I * J * K = I * (J * K) :=
Submodule.smul_assoc I J K
variable (I)
theorem mul_bot : I * ⊥ = ⊥ := by simp
theorem bot_mul : ⊥ * I = ⊥ := by simp
@[simp]
theorem top_mul : ⊤ * I = I :=
Submodule.top_smul I
variable {I}
theorem mul_mono (hik : I ≤ K) (hjl : J ≤ L) : I * J ≤ K * L :=
Submodule.smul_mono hik hjl
theorem mul_mono_left (h : I ≤ J) : I * K ≤ J * K :=
Submodule.smul_mono_left h
theorem mul_mono_right (h : J ≤ K) : I * J ≤ I * K :=
smul_mono_right I h
variable (I J K)
theorem mul_sup : I * (J ⊔ K) = I * J ⊔ I * K :=
Submodule.smul_sup I J K
theorem sup_mul : (I ⊔ J) * K = I * K ⊔ J * K :=
Submodule.sup_smul I J K
variable {I J K}
theorem pow_le_pow_right {m n : ℕ} (h : m ≤ n) : I ^ n ≤ I ^ m := by
obtain _ | m := m
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; exact le_top
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le h
rw [add_comm, Submodule.pow_add _ m.add_one_ne_zero]
exact mul_le_left
theorem pow_le_self {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : I ^ n ≤ I :=
calc
I ^ n ≤ I ^ 1 := pow_le_pow_right (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn)
_ = I := Submodule.pow_one _
theorem pow_right_mono (e : I ≤ J) (n : ℕ) : I ^ n ≤ J ^ n := by
induction' n with _ hn
· rw [Submodule.pow_zero, Submodule.pow_zero]
· rw [Submodule.pow_succ, Submodule.pow_succ]
exact Ideal.mul_mono hn e
namespace IsTwoSided
instance (priority := low) [J.IsTwoSided] : (I * J).IsTwoSided :=
⟨fun b ha ↦ Submodule.mul_induction_on ha
(fun i hi j hj ↦ by rw [mul_assoc]; exact mul_mem_mul hi (mul_mem_right _ _ hj))
fun x y hx hy ↦ by rw [right_distrib]; exact add_mem hx hy⟩
variable [I.IsTwoSided] (m n : ℕ)
instance (priority := low) : (I ^ n).IsTwoSided :=
n.rec
(by rw [Submodule.pow_zero, one_eq_top]; infer_instance)
(fun _ _ ↦ by rw [Submodule.pow_succ]; infer_instance)
protected theorem mul_one : I * 1 = I :=
mul_le_right.antisymm
fun i hi ↦ mul_one i ▸ mul_mem_mul hi (one_eq_top (R := R) ▸ Submodule.mem_top)
protected theorem pow_add : I ^ (m + n) = I ^ m * I ^ n := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_ne n 0
· rw [add_zero, Submodule.pow_zero, IsTwoSided.mul_one]
· exact Submodule.pow_add _ h
protected theorem pow_succ : I ^ (n + 1) = I * I ^ n := by
rw [add_comm, IsTwoSided.pow_add, Submodule.pow_one]
end IsTwoSided
@[simp]
theorem mul_eq_bot [NoZeroDivisors R] : I * J = ⊥ ↔ I = ⊥ ∨ J = ⊥ :=
⟨fun hij =>
or_iff_not_imp_left.mpr fun I_ne_bot =>
J.eq_bot_iff.mpr fun j hj =>
let ⟨i, hi, ne0⟩ := I.ne_bot_iff.mp I_ne_bot
Or.resolve_left (mul_eq_zero.mp ((I * J).eq_bot_iff.mp hij _ (mul_mem_mul hi hj))) ne0,
fun h => by obtain rfl | rfl := h; exacts [bot_mul _, mul_bot _]⟩
instance [NoZeroDivisors R] : NoZeroDivisors (Ideal R) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero := mul_eq_bot.1
instance {S A : Type*} [Semiring S] [SMul R S] [AddCommMonoid A] [Module R A] [Module S A]
[IsScalarTower R S A] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R A] {I : Submodule S A} : NoZeroSMulDivisors R I :=
Submodule.noZeroSMulDivisors (Submodule.restrictScalars R I)
theorem pow_eq_zero_of_mem {I : Ideal R} {n m : ℕ} (hnI : I ^ n = 0) (hmn : n ≤ m) {x : R}
(hx : x ∈ I) : x ^ m = 0 := by
simpa [hnI] using pow_le_pow_right hmn <| pow_mem_pow hx m
end Semiring
section MulAndRadical
variable {R : Type u} {ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {I J K L : Ideal R}
theorem mul_mem_mul_rev {r s} (hr : r ∈ I) (hs : s ∈ J) : s * r ∈ I * J :=
mul_comm r s ▸ mul_mem_mul hr hs
theorem prod_mem_prod {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {I : ι → Ideal R} {x : ι → R} :
(∀ i ∈ s, x i ∈ I i) → (∏ i ∈ s, x i) ∈ ∏ i ∈ s, I i := by
classical
refine Finset.induction_on s ?_ ?_
· intro
rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.prod_empty, one_eq_top]
exact Submodule.mem_top
· intro a s ha IH h
rw [Finset.prod_insert ha, Finset.prod_insert ha]
exact
mul_mem_mul (h a <| Finset.mem_insert_self a s)
(IH fun i hi => h i <| Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hi)
lemma sup_pow_add_le_pow_sup_pow {n m : ℕ} : (I ⊔ J) ^ (n + m) ≤ I ^ n ⊔ J ^ m := by
rw [← Ideal.add_eq_sup, ← Ideal.add_eq_sup, add_pow, Ideal.sum_eq_sup]
apply Finset.sup_le
intros i hi
by_cases hn : n ≤ i
· exact (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right hn).trans le_sup_left)))
· refine (Ideal.mul_le_right.trans (Ideal.mul_le_left.trans
((Ideal.pow_le_pow_right ?_).trans le_sup_right)))
omega
variable (I J K)
protected theorem mul_comm : I * J = J * I :=
le_antisymm (mul_le.2 fun _ hrI _ hsJ => mul_mem_mul_rev hsJ hrI)
(mul_le.2 fun _ hrJ _ hsI => mul_mem_mul_rev hsI hrJ)
theorem span_mul_span (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (⋃ (s ∈ S) (t ∈ T), {s * t}) :=
Submodule.span_smul_span S T
variable {I J K}
theorem span_mul_span' (S T : Set R) : span S * span T = span (S * T) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span]
theorem span_singleton_mul_span_singleton (r s : R) :
span {r} * span {s} = (span {r * s} : Ideal R) := by
unfold span
rw [Submodule.span_mul_span, Set.singleton_mul_singleton]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Ideal/Operations.lean | 431 | 432 | theorem span_singleton_pow (s : R) (n : ℕ) : span {s} ^ n = (span {s ^ n} : Ideal R) := by | induction' n with n ih; · simp [Set.singleton_one] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson, Filippo A. E. Nuccio, Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Canonical
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Coherent.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Sites.Preserves
/-!
# Sheaves for the extensive topology
This file characterises sheaves for the extensive topology.
## Main result
* `isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts`: In a finitary extensive category, the sheaves for the
extensive topology are precisely those preserving finite products.
-/
universe w
namespace CategoryTheory
open Limits Presieve Opposite
variable {C : Type*} [Category C] {D : Type*} [Category D]
variable [FinitaryPreExtensive C]
/-- A presieve is *extensive* if it is finite and its arrows induce an isomorphism from the
coproduct to the target. -/
class Presieve.Extensive {X : C} (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- `R` consists of a finite collection of arrows that together induce an isomorphism from the
coproduct of their sources. -/
arrows_nonempty_isColimit : ∃ (α : Type) (_ : Finite α) (Z : α → C) (π : (a : α) → (Z a ⟶ X)),
R = Presieve.ofArrows Z π ∧ Nonempty (IsColimit (Cofan.mk X π))
instance {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive] : S.hasPullbacks where
has_pullbacks := by
obtain ⟨_, _, _, _, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Presieve.Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
intro _ _ _ _ _ hg
cases hg
apply FinitaryPreExtensive.hasPullbacks_of_is_coproduct hc
/--
A finite product preserving presheaf is a sheaf for the extensive topology on a category which is
`FinitaryPreExtensive`.
-/
theorem isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts {X : C} (S : Presieve X) [S.Extensive]
(F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) [PreservesFiniteProducts F] : S.IsSheafFor F := by
obtain ⟨α, _, Z, π, rfl, ⟨hc⟩⟩ := Extensive.arrows_nonempty_isColimit (R := S)
have : (ofArrows Z (Cofan.mk X π).inj).hasPullbacks :=
(inferInstance : (ofArrows Z π).hasPullbacks)
cases nonempty_fintype α
exact isSheafFor_of_preservesProduct _ _ hc
instance {α : Type} [Finite α] (Z : α → C) : (ofArrows Z (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i)).Extensive :=
⟨⟨α, inferInstance, Z, (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i), rfl, ⟨coproductIsCoproduct _⟩⟩⟩
/-- Every Yoneda-presheaf is a sheaf for the extensive topology. -/
theorem extensiveTopology.isSheaf_yoneda_obj (W : C) : Presieve.IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C)
(yoneda.obj W) := by
rw [extensiveTopology, isSheaf_coverage]
intro X R ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, hi⟩
have : IsIso (Sigma.desc (Cofan.inj (Cofan.mk X π))) := hi
have : R.Extensive := ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, ⟨Cofan.isColimitOfIsIsoSigmaDesc (Cofan.mk X π)⟩⟩
exact isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts _ _
/-- The extensive topology on a finitary pre-extensive category is subcanonical. -/
instance extensiveTopology.subcanonical : (extensiveTopology C).Subcanonical :=
GrothendieckTopology.Subcanonical.of_isSheaf_yoneda_obj _ isSheaf_yoneda_obj
variable [FinitaryExtensive C]
/--
A presheaf of sets on a category which is `FinitaryExtensive` is a sheaf iff it preserves finite
products.
-/
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Coherent/ExtensiveSheaves.lean | 81 | 111 | theorem Presieve.isSheaf_iff_preservesFiniteProducts (F : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type w) :
Presieve.IsSheaf (extensiveTopology C) F ↔ PreservesFiniteProducts F := by | refine ⟨fun hF ↦ ⟨fun n ↦ ⟨fun {K} ↦ ?_⟩⟩, fun hF ↦ ?_⟩
· rw [extensiveTopology, isSheaf_coverage] at hF
let Z : Fin n → C := fun i ↦ unop (K.obj ⟨i⟩)
have : (ofArrows Z (Cofan.mk (∐ Z) (Sigma.ι Z)).inj).hasPullbacks :=
inferInstanceAs (ofArrows Z (Sigma.ι Z)).hasPullbacks
have : ∀ (i : Fin n), Mono (Cofan.inj (Cofan.mk (∐ Z) (Sigma.ι Z)) i) :=
inferInstanceAs <| ∀ (i : Fin n), Mono (Sigma.ι Z i)
let i : K ≅ Discrete.functor (fun i ↦ op (Z i)) := Discrete.natIsoFunctor
let _ : PreservesLimit (Discrete.functor (fun i ↦ op (Z i))) F :=
Presieve.preservesProduct_of_isSheafFor F ?_ initialIsInitial _ (coproductIsCoproduct Z)
(FinitaryExtensive.isPullback_initial_to_sigma_ι Z)
(hF (Presieve.ofArrows Z (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i)) ?_)
· exact preservesLimit_of_iso_diagram F i.symm
· apply hF
refine ⟨Empty, inferInstance, Empty.elim, IsEmpty.elim inferInstance, rfl, ⟨default,?_, ?_⟩⟩
· ext b
cases b
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· refine ⟨Fin n, inferInstance, Z, (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i), rfl, ?_⟩
suffices Sigma.desc (fun i ↦ Sigma.ι Z i) = 𝟙 _ by rw [this]; infer_instance
ext
simp
· rw [extensiveTopology, Presieve.isSheaf_coverage]
intro X R ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, hi⟩
have : IsIso (Sigma.desc (Cofan.inj (Cofan.mk X π))) := hi
have : R.Extensive := ⟨Y, α, Z, π, hR, ⟨Cofan.isColimitOfIsIsoSigmaDesc (Cofan.mk X π)⟩⟩
exact isSheafFor_extensive_of_preservesFiniteProducts R F
/-- |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Brendan Murphy
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Tuple.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Function.OfArity
/-!
# Currying and uncurrying of n-ary functions
A function of `n` arguments can either be written as `f a₁ a₂ ⋯ aₙ` or `f' ![a₁, a₂, ⋯, aₙ]`.
This file provides the currying and uncurrying operations that convert between the two, as
n-ary generalizations of the binary `curry` and `uncurry`.
## Main definitions
* `Function.OfArity.uncurry`: convert an `n`-ary function to a function from `Fin n → α`.
* `Function.OfArity.curry`: convert a function from `Fin n → α` to an `n`-ary function.
* `Function.FromTypes.uncurry`: convert an `p`-ary heterogeneous function to a
function from `(i : Fin n) → p i`.
* `Function.FromTypes.curry`: convert a function from `(i : Fin n) → p i` to a
`p`-ary heterogeneous function.
-/
universe u v w w'
namespace Function.FromTypes
open Matrix (vecCons vecHead vecTail vecEmpty)
/-- Uncurry all the arguments of `Function.FromTypes p τ` to get
a function from a tuple.
Note this can be used on raw functions if used. -/
def uncurry : {n : ℕ} → {p : Fin n → Type u} → {τ : Type u} →
(f : Function.FromTypes p τ) → ((i : Fin n) → p i) → τ
| 0 , _, _, f => fun _ => f
| _ + 1, _, _, f => fun args => (f (args 0)).uncurry (args ∘' Fin.succ)
/-- Curry all the arguments of `Function.FromTypes p τ` to get a function from a tuple. -/
def curry : {n : ℕ} → {p : Fin n → Type u} → {τ : Type u} →
(((i : Fin n) → p i) → τ) → Function.FromTypes p τ
| 0 , _, _, f => f isEmptyElim
| _ + 1, _, _, f => fun a => curry (fun args => f (Fin.cons a args))
@[simp]
theorem uncurry_apply_cons {n : ℕ} {α} {p : Fin n → Type u} {τ : Type u}
(f : Function.FromTypes (vecCons α p) τ) (a : α) (args : (i : Fin n) → p i) :
uncurry f (Fin.cons a args) = @uncurry _ p _ (f a) args := rfl
@[simp low]
theorem uncurry_apply_succ {n : ℕ} {p : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} {τ : Type u}
(f : Function.FromTypes p τ) (args : (i : Fin (n + 1)) → p i) :
uncurry f args = uncurry (f (args 0)) (Fin.tail args) :=
@uncurry_apply_cons n (p 0) (vecTail p) τ f (args 0) (Fin.tail args)
@[simp]
theorem curry_apply_cons {n : ℕ} {α} {p : Fin n → Type u} {τ : Type u}
(f : ((i : Fin (n + 1)) → (vecCons α p) i) → τ) (a : α) :
curry f a = @curry _ p _ (f ∘' Fin.cons a) := rfl
@[simp low]
theorem curry_apply_succ {n : ℕ} {p : Fin (n + 1) → Type u} {τ : Type u}
(f : ((i : Fin (n + 1)) → p i) → τ) (a : p 0) :
curry f a = curry (f ∘ Fin.cons a) := rfl
variable {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n → Type u} {τ : Type u}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Curry.lean | 73 | 76 | theorem curry_uncurry (f : Function.FromTypes p τ) : curry (uncurry f) = f := by | induction n with
| zero => rfl
| succ n ih => exact funext (ih <| f ·) |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.