Context stringlengths 295 65.3k | file_name stringlengths 21 74 | start int64 14 1.41k | end int64 20 1.41k | theorem stringlengths 27 1.42k | proof stringlengths 0 4.57k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 750 | 751 | theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.PolarCoord
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Basic
/-!
# Integrals involving the Gamma function
In this file, we collect several integrals over `ℝ` or `ℂ` that evaluate in terms of the
`Real.Gamma` function.
-/
open Real Set MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure
section real
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow {p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : -1 < q) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p) = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / p * x ^ (1 / p - 1)) • ((x ^ (1 / p)) ^ q * exp (-x)) := by
rw [← integral_comp_rpow_Ioi _ (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp)),
abs_eq_self.mpr (le_of_lt (one_div_pos.mpr hp))]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx) _ p, one_div_mul_cancel (ne_of_gt hp), rpow_one]
_ = ∫ (x : ℝ) in Ioi 0, 1 / p * exp (-x) * x ^ (1 / p - 1 + q / p) := by
simp_rw [smul_eq_mul, mul_assoc]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [← rpow_mul (le_of_lt hx), div_mul_eq_mul_div, one_mul, rpow_add hx]
ring_nf
_ = (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral (div_pos (neg_lt_iff_pos_add.mp hq) hp)]
simp_rw [show 1 / p - 1 + q / p = (q + 1) / p - 1 by field_simp; ring, ← integral_const_mul,
← mul_assoc]
theorem integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_rpow {p q b : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) (hq : -1 < q) (hb : 0 < b) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), x ^ q * exp (- b * x ^ p) =
b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
calc
_ = ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * ((b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ q * rexp (-(b ^ p⁻¹ * x) ^ p)) := by
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun _ hx => ?_)
rw [mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), mul_rpow _ (le_of_lt hx), ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_mul,
inv_mul_cancel₀, rpow_one, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_add, neg_mul p⁻¹, neg_add_cancel,
rpow_zero, one_mul, neg_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = (b ^ p⁻¹)⁻¹ * ∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * rexp (-x ^ p)) := by
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x => b ^ (-p⁻¹ * q) * (x ^ q * exp (- x ^ p))) 0,
mul_zero, smul_eq_mul]
all_goals positivity
_ = b ^ (-(q + 1) / p) * (1 / p) * Gamma ((q + 1) / p) := by
rw [integral_const_mul, integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow _ hq, mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul, ← rpow_add]
· congr; ring
all_goals positivity
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Gamma.lean | 59 | 63 | theorem integral_exp_neg_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp : 0 < p) :
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), exp (- x ^ p) = Gamma (1 / p + 1) := by | convert (integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_rpow hp neg_one_lt_zero) using 1
· simp_rw [rpow_zero, one_mul]
· rw [zero_add, Gamma_add_one (one_div_ne_zero (ne_of_gt hp))] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Affine
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.RightAngle
/-!
# Oriented angles in right-angled triangles.
This file proves basic geometrical results about distances and oriented angles in (possibly
degenerate) right-angled triangles in real inner product spaces and Euclidean affine spaces.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped EuclideanGeometry
open scoped Real
open scoped RealInnerProductSpace
namespace Orientation
open Module
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle x (x + y) = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_add_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`. -/
theorem oangle_add_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x + y) y = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).oangle_add_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero (o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem cos_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).cos_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side. -/
theorem sin_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).sin_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_add_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side. -/
theorem tan_oangle_add_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).tan_oangle_add_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x + y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖x + y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle x (x + y)) = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle x (x + y)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_add_right, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_tan_angle_add_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side. -/
theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_add_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x + y) y) = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
rw [add_comm]
exact (-o).norm_div_tan_oangle_add_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arccos (‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arccos_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arccos`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arccos (‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arccos_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arcsin (‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arcsin_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arcsin`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arcsin (‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arcsin_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle y (y - x) = Real.arctan (‖x‖ / ‖y‖) := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs,
InnerProductGeometry.angle_sub_eq_arctan_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h) (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- An angle in a right-angled triangle expressed using `arctan`, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem oangle_sub_left_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
o.oangle (x - y) x = Real.arctan (‖y‖ / ‖x‖) := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).oangle_sub_right_eq_arctan_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖x‖ / ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle as a ratio of sides, version subtracting
vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) :
Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖y‖ / ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The cosine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem cos_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).cos_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y - x‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.sin_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)]
/-- The sine of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the hypotenuse equals the
opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem sin_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x - y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).sin_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) * ‖y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.tan_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.tan_angle_sub_mul_norm_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- The tangent of an angle in a right-angled triangle multiplied by the adjacent side equals
the opposite side, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem tan_oangle_sub_left_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle (x - y) x) * ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).tan_oangle_sub_right_mul_norm_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_cos_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inl (o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the cosine of the adjacent angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_cos_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y - x‖ := by
have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two]
rw [o.oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one hs, Real.Angle.sin_coe,
InnerProductGeometry.norm_div_sin_angle_sub_of_inner_eq_zero
(o.inner_rev_eq_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h)
(Or.inr (o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h))]
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle equals the
hypotenuse, version subtracting vectors. -/
theorem norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_left_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖y‖ / Real.Angle.sin (o.oangle (x - y) x) = ‖x - y‖ := by
rw [← neg_inj, oangle_rev, ← oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg, neg_inj] at h ⊢
exact (-o).norm_div_sin_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two h
/-- A side of a right-angled triangle divided by the tangent of the opposite angle equals the
adjacent side, version subtracting vectors. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/RightAngle.lean | 428 | 431 | theorem norm_div_tan_oangle_sub_right_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V}
(h : o.oangle x y = ↑(π / 2)) : ‖x‖ / Real.Angle.tan (o.oangle y (y - x)) = ‖y‖ := by | have hs : (o.oangle y (y - x)).sign = 1 := by
rw [oangle_sign_sub_right_swap, h, Real.Angle.sign_coe_pi_div_two] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Bounds
/-!
# Pi
This file contains lemmas which establish bounds on `Real.pi`.
Notably, these include `pi_gt_sqrtTwoAddSeries` and `pi_lt_sqrtTwoAddSeries`,
which bound `π` using series;
numerical bounds on `π` such as `pi_gt_d2` and `pi_lt_d2` (more precise versions are given, too).
See also `Mathlib/Data/Real/Pi/Leibniz.lean` and `Mathlib/Data/Real/Pi/Wallis.lean` for infinite
formulas for `π`.
-/
open scoped Real
namespace Real
theorem pi_gt_sqrtTwoAddSeries (n : ℕ) : 2 ^ (n + 1) * √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) < π := by
have : √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 * 2 ^ (n + 2) < π := by
rw [← lt_div_iff₀, ← sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ]
focus
apply sin_lt
apply div_pos pi_pos
all_goals apply pow_pos; norm_num
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq ?_) this
rw [pow_succ' _ (n + 1), ← mul_assoc, div_mul_cancel₀, mul_comm]; norm_num
theorem pi_lt_sqrtTwoAddSeries (n : ℕ) :
π < 2 ^ (n + 1) * √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) + 1 / 4 ^ n := by
have : π < (√(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 + 1 / (2 ^ n) ^ 3 / 4) * (2 : ℝ) ^ (n + 2) := by
rw [← div_lt_iff₀ (by norm_num), ← sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ, ← sub_lt_iff_lt_add']
calc
π / 2 ^ (n + 2) - sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) < (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 3 / 4 :=
sub_lt_comm.1 <| sin_gt_sub_cube (by positivity) <| div_le_one_of_le₀ ?_ (by positivity)
_ ≤ (4 / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 3 / 4 := by gcongr; exact pi_le_four
_ = 1 / (2 ^ n) ^ 3 / 4 := by simp [add_comm n, pow_add, div_mul_eq_div_div]; norm_num
calc
π ≤ 4 := pi_le_four
_ = 2 ^ (0 + 2) := by norm_num
_ ≤ 2 ^ (n + 2) := by gcongr <;> norm_num
refine lt_of_lt_of_le this (le_of_eq ?_); rw [add_mul]; congr 1
· ring
simp only [show (4 : ℝ) = 2 ^ 2 by norm_num, ← pow_mul, div_div, ← pow_add]
rw [one_div, one_div, inv_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul₀, eq_comm, mul_inv_eq_iff_eq_mul₀, ← pow_add]
· rw [add_assoc, Nat.mul_succ, add_comm, add_comm n, add_assoc, mul_comm n]
all_goals norm_num
/-- From an upper bound on `sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n = 2 cos (π / 2 ^ (n+1))` of the form
`sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n ≤ 2 - (a / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2)`, one can deduce the lower bound `a < π`
thanks to basic trigonometric inequalities as expressed in `pi_gt_sqrtTwoAddSeries`. -/
theorem pi_lower_bound_start (n : ℕ) {a}
(h : sqrtTwoAddSeries ((0 : ℕ) / (1 : ℕ)) n ≤ (2 : ℝ) - (a / (2 : ℝ) ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2) :
a < π := by
refine lt_of_le_of_lt ?_ (pi_gt_sqrtTwoAddSeries n); rw [mul_comm]
refine (div_le_iff₀ (pow_pos (by norm_num) _)).mp (le_sqrt_of_sq_le ?_)
rwa [le_sub_comm, show (0 : ℝ) = (0 : ℕ) / (1 : ℕ) by rw [Nat.cast_zero, zero_div]]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_step_up (c d : ℕ) {a b n : ℕ} {z : ℝ} (hz : sqrtTwoAddSeries (c / d) n ≤ z)
(hb : 0 < b) (hd : 0 < d) (h : (2 * b + a) * d ^ 2 ≤ c ^ 2 * b) :
sqrtTwoAddSeries (a / b) (n + 1) ≤ z := by
refine le_trans ?_ hz; rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ]; apply sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left
have hb' : 0 < (b : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.2 hb
have hd' : 0 < (d : ℝ) := Nat.cast_pos.2 hd
rw [sqrt_le_left (div_nonneg c.cast_nonneg d.cast_nonneg), div_pow,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div _ _ (ne_of_gt hb'), div_le_div_iff₀ hb' (pow_pos hd' _)]
exact mod_cast h
/-- From a lower bound on `sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n = 2 cos (π / 2 ^ (n+1))` of the form
`2 - ((a - 1 / 4 ^ n) / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n`, one can deduce the upper bound
`π < a` thanks to basic trigonometric formulas as expressed in `pi_lt_sqrtTwoAddSeries`. -/
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Pi/Bounds.lean | 77 | 82 | theorem pi_upper_bound_start (n : ℕ) {a}
(h : (2 : ℝ) - ((a - 1 / (4 : ℝ) ^ n) / (2 : ℝ) ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 ≤
sqrtTwoAddSeries ((0 : ℕ) / (1 : ℕ)) n)
(h₂ : (1 : ℝ) / (4 : ℝ) ^ n ≤ a) : π < a := by | refine lt_of_lt_of_le (pi_lt_sqrtTwoAddSeries n) ?_
rw [← le_sub_iff_add_le, ← le_div_iff₀', sqrt_le_left, sub_le_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Edward Ayers
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.HasPullback
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# Theory of sieves
- For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X`
which is closed under left-composition.
- The complete lattice structure on sieves is given, as well as the Galois insertion
given by downward-closing.
- A `Sieve X` (functorially) induces a presheaf on `C` together with a monomorphism to
the yoneda embedding of `X`.
## Tags
sieve, pullback
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D] (F : C ⥤ D)
variable {X Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ X)
/-- A set of arrows all with codomain `X`. -/
def Presieve (X : C) :=
∀ ⦃Y⦄, Set (Y ⟶ X)-- deriving CompleteLattice
instance : CompleteLattice (Presieve X) := by
dsimp [Presieve]
infer_instance
namespace Presieve
noncomputable instance : Inhabited (Presieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
/-- The full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting of arrows which belong to a
presieve on `X`. -/
abbrev category {X : C} (P : Presieve X) :=
ObjectProperty.FullSubcategory fun f : Over X => P f.hom
/-- Construct an object of `P.category`. -/
abbrev categoryMk {X : C} (P : Presieve X) {Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (hf : P f) : P.category :=
⟨Over.mk f, hf⟩
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated diagram `S.diagram` is defined to be
the natural functor from the full subcategory of the over category `C/X` consisting
of arrows in `S` to `C`. -/
abbrev diagram (S : Presieve X) : S.category ⥤ C :=
ObjectProperty.ι _ ⋙ Over.forget X
/-- Given a sieve `S` on `X : C`, its associated cocone `S.cocone` is defined to be
the natural cocone over the diagram defined above with cocone point `X`. -/
abbrev cocone (S : Presieve X) : Cocone S.diagram :=
(Over.forgetCocone X).whisker (ObjectProperty.ι _)
/-- Given a set of arrows `S` all with codomain `X`, and a set of arrows with codomain `Y` for each
`f : Y ⟶ X` in `S`, produce a set of arrows with codomain `X`:
`{ g ≫ f | (f : Y ⟶ X) ∈ S, (g : Z ⟶ Y) ∈ R f }`.
-/
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y) : Presieve X := fun Z h =>
∃ (Y : C) (g : Z ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ X) (H : S f), R H g ∧ g ≫ f = h
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Presieve.bind S R h`. -/
structure BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) where
/-- the intermediate object -/
Y : C
/-- a morphism in the family of presieves `R` -/
g : Z ⟶ Y
/-- a morphism in the presieve `S` -/
f : Y ⟶ X
hf : S f
hg : R hf g
fac : g ≫ f = h
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] BindStruct.fac
/-- If a morphism `h` satisfies `Presieve.bind S R h`, this is a choice of a structure
in `BindStruct S R h`. -/
noncomputable def bind.bindStruct {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (H : bind S R h) : BindStruct S R h :=
Nonempty.some (by
obtain ⟨Y, g, f, hf, hg, fac⟩ := H
exact ⟨{ hf := hf, hg := hg, fac := fac, .. }⟩)
lemma BindStruct.bind {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y}
{Z : C} {h : Z ⟶ X} (b : BindStruct S R h) : bind S R h :=
⟨b.Y, b.g, b.f, b.hf, b.hg, b.fac⟩
@[simp]
theorem bind_comp {S : Presieve X} {R : ∀ ⦃Y : C⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Presieve Y} {g : Z ⟶ Y}
(h₁ : S f) (h₂ : R h₁ g) : bind S R (g ≫ f) :=
⟨_, _, _, h₁, h₂, rfl⟩
-- Porting note: it seems the definition of `Presieve` must be unfolded in order to define
-- this inductive type, it was thus renamed `singleton'`
-- Note we can't make this into `HasSingleton` because of the out-param.
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
inductive singleton' : ⦃Y : C⦄ → (Y ⟶ X) → Prop
| mk : singleton' f
/-- The singleton presieve. -/
def singleton : Presieve X := singleton' f
lemma singleton.mk {f : Y ⟶ X} : singleton f f := singleton'.mk
@[simp]
theorem singleton_eq_iff_domain (f g : Y ⟶ X) : singleton f g ↔ f = g := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl⟩
rfl
· rintro rfl
apply singleton.mk
theorem singleton_self : singleton f f :=
singleton.mk
/-- Pullback a set of arrows with given codomain along a fixed map, by taking the pullback in the
category.
This is not the same as the arrow set of `Sieve.pullback`, but there is a relation between them
in `pullbackArrows_comm`.
-/
inductive pullbackArrows [HasPullbacks C] (R : Presieve X) : Presieve Y
| mk (Z : C) (h : Z ⟶ X) : R h → pullbackArrows _ (pullback.snd h f)
theorem pullback_singleton [HasPullbacks C] (g : Z ⟶ X) :
pullbackArrows f (singleton g) = singleton (pullback.snd g f) := by
funext W
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨W, _, _, _⟩
exact singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk Z g singleton.mk
/-- Construct the presieve given by the family of arrows indexed by `ι`. -/
inductive ofArrows {ι : Type*} (Y : ι → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) : Presieve X
| mk (i : ι) : ofArrows _ _ (f i)
theorem ofArrows_pUnit : (ofArrows _ fun _ : PUnit => f) = singleton f := by
funext Y
ext g
constructor
· rintro ⟨_⟩
apply singleton.mk
· rintro ⟨_⟩
exact ofArrows.mk PUnit.unit
theorem ofArrows_pullback [HasPullbacks C] {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X) :
(ofArrows (fun i => pullback (g i) f) fun _ => pullback.snd _ _) =
pullbackArrows f (ofArrows Z g) := by
funext T
ext h
constructor
· rintro ⟨hk⟩
exact pullbackArrows.mk _ _ (ofArrows.mk hk)
· rintro ⟨W, k, ⟨_⟩⟩
apply ofArrows.mk
theorem ofArrows_bind {ι : Type*} (Z : ι → C) (g : ∀ i : ι, Z i ⟶ X)
(j : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), ofArrows Z g f → Type*) (W : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H), j f H → C)
(k : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X) (H i), W f H i ⟶ Y) :
((ofArrows Z g).bind fun _ f H => ofArrows (W f H) (k f H)) =
ofArrows (fun i : Σi, j _ (ofArrows.mk i) => W (g i.1) _ i.2) fun ij =>
k (g ij.1) _ ij.2 ≫ g ij.1 := by
funext Y
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨_, _, _, ⟨i⟩, ⟨i'⟩, rfl⟩
exact ofArrows.mk (Sigma.mk _ _)
· rintro ⟨i⟩
exact bind_comp _ (ofArrows.mk _) (ofArrows.mk _)
theorem ofArrows_surj {ι : Type*} {Y : ι → C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) {Z : C} (g : Z ⟶ X)
(hg : ofArrows Y f g) : ∃ (i : ι) (h : Y i = Z),
g = eqToHom h.symm ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨i⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, rfl, by simp only [eqToHom_refl, id_comp]⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `F(X)`, we can define a presieve on `X` by taking the preimage via `F`. -/
def functorPullback (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) : Presieve X := fun _ f => R (F.map f)
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_mem (R : Presieve (F.obj X)) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
R.functorPullback F f ↔ R (F.map f) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem functorPullback_id (R : Presieve X) : R.functorPullback (𝟭 _) = R :=
rfl
/-- Given a presieve `R` on `X`, the predicate `R.hasPullbacks` means that for all arrows `f` and
`g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
class hasPullbacks (R : Presieve X) : Prop where
/-- For all arrows `f` and `g` in `R`, the pullback of `f` and `g` exists. -/
has_pullbacks : ∀ {Y Z} {f : Y ⟶ X} (_ : R f) {g : Z ⟶ X} (_ : R g), HasPullback f g
instance (R : Presieve X) [HasPullbacks C] : R.hasPullbacks := ⟨fun _ _ ↦ inferInstance⟩
instance {α : Type v₂} {X : α → C} {B : C} (π : (a : α) → X a ⟶ B)
[(Presieve.ofArrows X π).hasPullbacks] (a b : α) : HasPullback (π a) (π b) :=
Presieve.hasPullbacks.has_pullbacks (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _) (Presieve.ofArrows.mk _)
section FunctorPushforward
variable {E : Type u₃} [Category.{v₃} E] (G : D ⥤ E)
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, we can define a presieve on `F(X)` (which is actually a sieve)
by taking the sieve generated by the image via `F`.
-/
def functorPushforward (S : Presieve X) : Presieve (F.obj X) := fun Y f =>
∃ (Z : C) (g : Z ⟶ X) (h : Y ⟶ F.obj Z), S g ∧ f = h ≫ F.map g
/-- An auxiliary definition in order to fix the choice of the preimages between various definitions.
-/
structure FunctorPushforwardStructure (S : Presieve X) {Y} (f : Y ⟶ F.obj X) where
/-- an object in the source category -/
preobj : C
/-- a map in the source category which has to be in the presieve -/
premap : preobj ⟶ X
/-- the morphism which appear in the factorisation -/
lift : Y ⟶ F.obj preobj
/-- the condition that `premap` is in the presieve -/
cover : S premap
/-- the factorisation of the morphism -/
fac : f = lift ≫ F.map premap
/-- The fixed choice of a preimage. -/
noncomputable def getFunctorPushforwardStructure {F : C ⥤ D} {S : Presieve X} {Y : D}
{f : Y ⟶ F.obj X} (h : S.functorPushforward F f) : FunctorPushforwardStructure F S f := by
choose Z f' g h₁ h using h
exact ⟨Z, f', g, h₁, h⟩
theorem functorPushforward_comp (R : Presieve X) :
R.functorPushforward (F ⋙ G) = (R.functorPushforward F).functorPushforward G := by
funext x
ext f
constructor
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, h₁, rfl⟩
exact ⟨F.obj X, F.map f₁, g₁, ⟨X, f₁, 𝟙 _, h₁, by simp⟩, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨X, f₁, g₁, ⟨X', f₂, g₂, h₁, rfl⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨X', f₂, g₁ ≫ G.map g₂, h₁, by simp⟩
theorem image_mem_functorPushforward (R : Presieve X) {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : R f) :
R.functorPushforward F (F.map f) :=
⟨Y, f, 𝟙 _, h, by simp⟩
end FunctorPushforward
end Presieve
/--
For an object `X` of a category `C`, a `Sieve X` is a set of morphisms to `X` which is closed under
left-composition.
-/
structure Sieve {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] (X : C) where
/-- the underlying presieve -/
arrows : Presieve X
/-- stability by precomposition -/
downward_closed : ∀ {Y Z f} (_ : arrows f) (g : Z ⟶ Y), arrows (g ≫ f)
namespace Sieve
instance : CoeFun (Sieve X) fun _ => Presieve X :=
⟨Sieve.arrows⟩
initialize_simps_projections Sieve (arrows → apply)
variable {S R : Sieve X}
attribute [simp] downward_closed
theorem arrows_ext : ∀ {R S : Sieve X}, R.arrows = S.arrows → R = S := by
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨_, _⟩ rfl
rfl
@[ext]
protected theorem ext {R S : Sieve X} (h : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), R f ↔ S f) : R = S :=
arrows_ext <| funext fun _ => funext fun f => propext <| h f
open Lattice
/-- The supremum of a collection of sieves: the union of them all. -/
protected def sup (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∃ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ f} hf _ := by
obtain ⟨S, hS, hf⟩ := hf
exact ⟨S, hS, S.downward_closed hf _⟩
/-- The infimum of a collection of sieves: the intersection of them all. -/
protected def inf (𝒮 : Set (Sieve X)) : Sieve X where
arrows _ := { f | ∀ S ∈ 𝒮, Sieve.arrows S f }
downward_closed {_ _ _} hf g S H := S.downward_closed (hf S H) g
/-- The union of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def union (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∨ R f
downward_closed := by rintro _ _ _ (h | h) g <;> simp [h]
/-- The intersection of two sieves is a sieve. -/
protected def inter (S R : Sieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows _ f := S f ∧ R f
downward_closed := by
rintro _ _ _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ g
simp [h₁, h₂]
/-- Sieves on an object `X` form a complete lattice.
We generate this directly rather than using the galois insertion for nicer definitional properties.
-/
instance : CompleteLattice (Sieve X) where
le S R := ∀ ⦃Y⦄ (f : Y ⟶ X), S f → R f
le_refl _ _ _ := id
le_trans _ _ _ S₁₂ S₂₃ _ _ h := S₂₃ _ (S₁₂ _ h)
le_antisymm _ _ p q := Sieve.ext fun _ _ => ⟨p _, q _⟩
top :=
{ arrows := fun _ => Set.univ
downward_closed := fun _ _ => ⟨⟩ }
bot :=
{ arrows := fun _ => ∅
downward_closed := False.elim }
sup := Sieve.union
inf := Sieve.inter
sSup := Sieve.sup
sInf := Sieve.inf
le_sSup _ S hS _ _ hf := ⟨S, hS, hf⟩
sSup_le := fun _ _ ha _ _ ⟨b, hb, hf⟩ => (ha b hb) _ hf
sInf_le _ _ hS _ _ h := h _ hS
le_sInf _ _ hS _ _ hf _ hR := hS _ hR _ hf
le_sup_left _ _ _ _ := Or.inl
le_sup_right _ _ _ _ := Or.inr
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ f := by--ℰ S hS Y f := by
rintro (hf | hf)
· exact h₁ _ hf
· exact h₂ _ hf
inf_le_left _ _ _ _ := And.left
inf_le_right _ _ _ _ := And.right
le_inf _ _ _ p q _ _ z := ⟨p _ z, q _ z⟩
le_top _ _ _ _ := trivial
bot_le _ _ _ := False.elim
/-- The maximal sieve always exists. -/
instance sieveInhabited : Inhabited (Sieve X) :=
⟨⊤⟩
@[simp]
theorem sInf_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sInf Ss f ↔ ∀ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem sSup_apply {Ss : Set (Sieve X)} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) :
sSup Ss f ↔ ∃ (S : Sieve X) (_ : S ∈ Ss), S f := by
simp [sSup, Sieve.sup, setOf]
@[simp]
theorem inter_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊓ S) f ↔ R f ∧ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem union_apply {R S : Sieve X} {Y} (f : Y ⟶ X) : (R ⊔ S) f ↔ R f ∨ S f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_apply (f : Y ⟶ X) : (⊤ : Sieve X) f :=
trivial
/-- Generate the smallest sieve containing the given set of arrows. -/
@[simps]
def generate (R : Presieve X) : Sieve X where
arrows Z f := ∃ (Y : _) (h : Z ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ X), R g ∧ h ≫ g = f
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z _ ⟨W, g, f, hf, rfl⟩ h
exact ⟨_, h ≫ g, _, hf, by simp⟩
/-- Given a presieve on `X`, and a sieve on each domain of an arrow in the presieve, we can bind to
produce a sieve on `X`.
-/
@[simps]
def bind (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y) : Sieve X where
arrows := S.bind fun _ _ h => R h
downward_closed := by
rintro Y Z f ⟨W, f, h, hh, hf, rfl⟩ g
exact ⟨_, g ≫ f, _, hh, by simp [hf]⟩
/-- Structure which contains the data and properties for a morphism `h` satisfying
`Sieve.bind S R h`. -/
abbrev BindStruct (S : Presieve X) (R : ∀ ⦃Y⦄ ⦃f : Y ⟶ X⦄, S f → Sieve Y)
{Z : C} (h : Z ⟶ X) :=
Presieve.BindStruct S (fun _ _ hf ↦ R hf) h
open Order Lattice
theorem generate_le_iff (R : Presieve X) (S : Sieve X) : generate R ≤ S ↔ R ≤ S :=
⟨fun H _ _ hg => H _ ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hg, id_comp _⟩, fun ss Y f => by
rintro ⟨Z, f, g, hg, rfl⟩
exact S.downward_closed (ss Z hg) f⟩
/-- Show that there is a galois insertion (generate, set_over). -/
def giGenerate : GaloisInsertion (generate : Presieve X → Sieve X) arrows where
gc := generate_le_iff
choice 𝒢 _ := generate 𝒢
choice_eq _ _ := rfl
le_l_u _ _ _ hf := ⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, hf, id_comp _⟩
theorem le_generate (R : Presieve X) : R ≤ generate R :=
giGenerate.gc.le_u_l R
@[simp]
theorem generate_sieve (S : Sieve X) : generate S = S :=
giGenerate.l_u_eq S
/-- If the identity arrow is in a sieve, the sieve is maximal. -/
theorem id_mem_iff_eq_top : S (𝟙 X) ↔ S = ⊤ :=
⟨fun h => top_unique fun Y f _ => by simpa using downward_closed _ h f, fun h => h.symm ▸ trivial⟩
/-- If an arrow set contains a split epi, it generates the maximal sieve. -/
theorem generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi {R : Presieve X} (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] (hf : R f) :
generate R = ⊤ := by
rw [← id_mem_iff_eq_top]
exact ⟨_, section_ f, f, hf, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem generate_of_singleton_isSplitEpi (f : Y ⟶ X) [IsSplitEpi f] :
generate (Presieve.singleton f) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi f (Presieve.singleton_self _)
@[simp]
theorem generate_top : generate (⊤ : Presieve X) = ⊤ :=
generate_of_contains_isSplitEpi (𝟙 _) ⟨⟩
@[simp]
lemma comp_mem_iff (i : X ⟶ Y) (f : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso i] (S : Sieve Z) :
S (i ≫ f) ↔ S f := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun H ↦ S.downward_closed H _⟩
convert S.downward_closed H (inv i)
simp
section
variable {I : Type*} {X : C} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X)
/-- The sieve of `X` generated by family of morphisms `Y i ⟶ X`. -/
abbrev ofArrows : Sieve X := generate (Presieve.ofArrows Y f)
lemma ofArrows_mk (i : I) : ofArrows Y f (f i) :=
⟨_, 𝟙 _, _, ⟨i⟩, by simp⟩
lemma mem_ofArrows_iff {W : C} (g : W ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f g ↔ ∃ (i : I) (a : W ⟶ Y i), g = a ≫ f i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨T, a, b, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨i, a, rfl⟩
apply downward_closed _ (ofArrows_mk Y f i)
variable {Y f} {W : C} {g : W ⟶ X} (hg : ofArrows Y f g)
include hg in
lemma ofArrows.exists : ∃ (i : I) (h : W ⟶ Y i), g = h ≫ f i := by
obtain ⟨_, h, _, ⟨i⟩, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, h, rfl⟩
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a choice of `i` such that `g`
factors through `f i`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.i : I := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose
/-- When `hg : Sieve.ofArrows Y f g`, this is a morphism `h : W ⟶ Y (i hg)` such
that `h ≫ f (i hg) = g`. -/
noncomputable def ofArrows.h : W ⟶ Y (i hg) := (ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
lemma ofArrows.fac : h hg ≫ f (i hg) = g :=
(ofArrows.exists hg).choose_spec.choose_spec.symm
end
/-- The sieve generated by two morphisms. -/
abbrev ofTwoArrows {U V X : C} (i : U ⟶ X) (j : V ⟶ X) : Sieve X :=
Sieve.ofArrows (Y := pairFunction U V) (fun k ↦ WalkingPair.casesOn k i j)
/-- The sieve of `X : C` that is generated by a family of objects `Y : I → C`:
it consists of morphisms to `X` which factor through at least one of the `Y i`. -/
def ofObjects {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (X : C) : Sieve X where
arrows Z _ := ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i)
downward_closed := by
rintro Z₁ Z₂ p ⟨i, ⟨f⟩⟩ g
exact ⟨i, ⟨g ≫ f⟩⟩
lemma mem_ofObjects_iff {I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {Z X : C} (g : Z ⟶ X) :
ofObjects Y X g ↔ ∃ (i : I), Nonempty (Z ⟶ Y i) := by rfl
lemma ofArrows_le_ofObjects
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) {X : C} (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
Sieve.ofArrows Y f ≤ Sieve.ofObjects Y X := by
intro W g hg
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff] at hg
obtain ⟨i, a, rfl⟩ := hg
exact ⟨i, ⟨a⟩⟩
lemma ofArrows_eq_ofObjects {X : C} (hX : IsTerminal X)
{I : Type*} (Y : I → C) (f : ∀ i, Y i ⟶ X) :
ofArrows Y f = ofObjects Y X := by
refine le_antisymm (ofArrows_le_ofObjects Y f) (fun W g => ?_)
rw [mem_ofArrows_iff, mem_ofObjects_iff]
rintro ⟨i, ⟨h⟩⟩
exact ⟨i, h, hX.hom_ext _ _⟩
/-- Given a morphism `h : Y ⟶ X`, send a sieve S on X to a sieve on Y
as the inverse image of S with `_ ≫ h`.
That is, `Sieve.pullback S h := (≫ h) '⁻¹ S`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (h : Y ⟶ X) (S : Sieve X) : Sieve Y where
arrows _ sl := S (sl ≫ h)
downward_closed g := by simp [g]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_id : S.pullback (𝟙 _) = S := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem pullback_top {f : Y ⟶ X} : (⊤ : Sieve X).pullback f = ⊤ :=
top_unique fun _ _ => id
theorem pullback_comp {f : Y ⟶ X} {g : Z ⟶ Y} (S : Sieve X) :
S.pullback (g ≫ f) = (S.pullback f).pullback g := by simp [Sieve.ext_iff]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Sites/Sieves.lean | 539 | 540 | theorem pullback_inter {f : Y ⟶ X} (S R : Sieve X) :
(S ⊓ R).pullback f = S.pullback f ⊓ R.pullback f := by | simp [Sieve.ext_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Complex
import Qq
/-! # Power function on `ℝ`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y`, where `x` and `y` are real numbers.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real ComplexConjugate Finset Set
/-
## Definitions
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
/-- The real power function `x ^ y`, defined as the real part of the complex power function.
For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`, one sets `0 ^ 0=1` and `0 ^ y=0` for
`y ≠ 0`. For `x < 0`, the definition is somewhat arbitrary as it depends on the choice of a complex
determination of the logarithm. With our conventions, it is equal to `exp (y log x) cos (π y)`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x y : ℝ) :=
((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ ℝ := ⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y := rfl
theorem rpow_def (x y : ℝ) : x ^ y = ((x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ)).re := rfl
theorem rpow_def_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) := by
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def]; split_ifs <;>
simp_all [(Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, -Complex.ofReal_mul,
(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, Complex.exp_ofReal_re, Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
theorem rpow_def_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hx), if_neg (ne_of_gt hx)]
theorem exp_mul (x y : ℝ) : exp (x * y) = exp x ^ y := by rw [rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos _), log_exp]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_intCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
simp only [rpow_def, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, Complex.cpow_intCast, Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by simpa using rpow_intCast x n
@[simp]
theorem exp_one_rpow (x : ℝ) : exp 1 ^ x = exp x := by rw [← exp_mul, one_mul]
@[simp] lemma exp_one_pow (n : ℕ) : exp 1 ^ n = exp n := by rw [← rpow_natCast, exp_one_rpow]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]
split_ifs <;> simp [*, exp_ne_zero]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg, *]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ne_zero (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y ≠ 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
Real.rpow_eq_zero hx hy |>.not
open Real
theorem rpow_def_of_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : x < 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ y = exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
rw [rpow_def, Complex.cpow_def, if_neg]
· have : Complex.log x * y = ↑(log (-x) * y) + ↑(y * π) * Complex.I := by
simp only [Complex.log, Complex.norm_real, norm_eq_abs, abs_of_neg hx, log_neg_eq_log,
Complex.arg_ofReal_of_neg hx, Complex.ofReal_mul]
ring
rw [this, Complex.exp_add_mul_I, ← Complex.ofReal_exp, ← Complex.ofReal_cos, ←
Complex.ofReal_sin, mul_add, ← Complex.ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Complex.ofReal_mul,
Complex.add_re, Complex.ofReal_re, Complex.mul_re, Complex.I_re, Complex.ofReal_im,
Real.log_neg_eq_log]
ring
· rw [Complex.ofReal_eq_zero]
exact ne_of_lt hx
theorem rpow_def_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ y = if x = 0 then if y = 0 then 1 else 0 else exp (log x * y) * cos (y * π) := by
split_ifs with h <;> simp [rpow_def, *]; exact rpow_def_of_neg (lt_of_le_of_ne hx h) _
@[bound]
theorem rpow_pos_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]; apply exp_pos
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem rpow_zero_pos (x : ℝ) : 0 < x ^ (0 : ℝ) := by simp
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x = 0 := by simp [rpow_def, *]
theorem zero_rpow_eq_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : 0 ^ x = a ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
constructor
· intro hyp
simp only [rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_zero] at hyp
by_cases h : x = 0
· subst h
simp only [Complex.one_re, Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.cpow_zero] at hyp
exact Or.inr ⟨rfl, hyp.symm⟩
· rw [Complex.zero_cpow (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr h)] at hyp
exact Or.inl ⟨h, hyp.symm⟩
· rintro (⟨h, rfl⟩ | ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)
· exact zero_rpow h
· exact rpow_zero _
theorem eq_zero_rpow_iff {x : ℝ} {a : ℝ} : a = 0 ^ x ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ a = 0 ∨ x = 0 ∧ a = 1 := by
rw [← zero_rpow_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by simp [rpow_def]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ) ^ x = 1 := by simp [rpow_def]
theorem zero_rpow_le_one (x : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ) ^ x ≤ 1 := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
theorem zero_rpow_nonneg (x : ℝ) : 0 ≤ (0 : ℝ) ^ x := by
by_cases h : x = 0 <;> simp [h, zero_le_one]
@[bound]
theorem rpow_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : 0 ≤ x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;>
simp only [zero_le_one, le_refl, le_of_lt (exp_pos _)]
theorem abs_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : |x ^ y| = |x| ^ y := by
have h_rpow_nonneg : 0 ≤ x ^ y := Real.rpow_nonneg hx_nonneg _
rw [abs_eq_self.mpr hx_nonneg, abs_eq_self.mpr h_rpow_nonneg]
@[bound]
theorem abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ |x| ^ y := by
rcases le_or_lt 0 x with hx | hx
· rw [abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx]
· rw [abs_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_neg hx, rpow_def_of_pos (neg_pos.2 hx), log_neg_eq_log, abs_mul,
abs_of_pos (exp_pos _)]
exact mul_le_of_le_one_right (exp_pos _).le (abs_cos_le_one _)
theorem abs_rpow_le_exp_log_mul (x y : ℝ) : |x ^ y| ≤ exp (log x * y) := by
refine (abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow x y).trans ?_
by_cases hx : x = 0
· by_cases hy : y = 0 <;> simp [hx, hy, zero_le_one]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos (abs_pos.2 hx), log_abs]
lemma rpow_inv_log (hx₀ : 0 < x) (hx₁ : x ≠ 1) : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ = exp 1 := by
rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx₀, mul_inv_cancel₀]
exact log_ne_zero.2 ⟨hx₀.ne', hx₁, (hx₀.trans' <| by norm_num).ne'⟩
/-- See `Real.rpow_inv_log` for the equality when `x ≠ 1` is strictly positive. -/
lemma rpow_inv_log_le_exp_one : x ^ (log x)⁻¹ ≤ exp 1 := by
calc
_ ≤ |x ^ (log x)⁻¹| := le_abs_self _
_ ≤ |x| ^ (log x)⁻¹ := abs_rpow_le_abs_rpow ..
rw [← log_abs]
obtain hx | hx := (abs_nonneg x).eq_or_gt
· simp [hx]
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx]
gcongr
exact mul_inv_le_one
theorem norm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx_nonneg : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
simp_rw [Real.norm_eq_abs]
exact abs_rpow_of_nonneg hx_nonneg
variable {w x y z : ℝ}
theorem rpow_add (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_pos hx, mul_add, exp_add]
theorem rpow_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | pos)
· rw [zero_rpow h, zero_eq_mul]
have : y ≠ 0 ∨ z ≠ 0 := not_and_or.1 fun ⟨hy, hz⟩ => h <| hy.symm ▸ hz.symm ▸ zero_add 0
exact this.imp zero_rpow zero_rpow
· exact rpow_add pos _ _
/-- Variant of `Real.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add' hx]; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rcases hy.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hy)
· rw [zero_add, rpow_zero, one_mul]
exact rpow_add' hx (ne_of_gt <| add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg hy hz)
/-- For `0 ≤ x`, the only problematic case in the equality `x ^ y * x ^ z = x ^ (y + z)` is for
`x = 0` and `y + z = 0`, where the right hand side is `1` while the left hand side can vanish.
The inequality is always true, though, and given in this lemma. -/
theorem le_rpow_add {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ y * x ^ z ≤ x ^ (y + z) := by
rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 hx with (H | pos)
· by_cases h : y + z = 0
· simp only [H.symm, h, rpow_zero]
calc
(0 : ℝ) ^ y * 0 ^ z ≤ 1 * 1 :=
mul_le_mul (zero_rpow_le_one y) (zero_rpow_le_one z) (zero_rpow_nonneg z) zero_le_one
_ = 1 := by simp
· simp [rpow_add', ← H, h]
· simp [rpow_add pos]
theorem rpow_sum_of_pos {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (f : ι → ℝ) (s : Finset ι) :
(a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x :=
map_sum (⟨⟨fun (x : ℝ) => (a ^ x : ℝ), rpow_zero a⟩, rpow_add ha⟩ : ℝ →+ (Additive ℝ)) f s
theorem rpow_sum_of_nonneg {ι : Type*} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, 0 ≤ f x) : (a ^ ∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∏ x ∈ s, a ^ f x := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction with i s hi ihs
· rw [sum_empty, Finset.prod_empty, rpow_zero]
· rw [forall_mem_cons] at h
rw [sum_cons, prod_cons, ← ihs h.2, rpow_add_of_nonneg ha h.1 (sum_nonneg h.2)]
theorem rpow_neg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [rpow_def_of_nonneg hx]; split_ifs <;> simp_all [exp_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add hx, rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx), div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_sub' {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y z : ℝ} (h : y - z ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg] at h ⊢
simp only [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_neg hx, div_eq_mul_inv]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.rpow_const {α : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : HasCompactSupport f) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) : HasCompactSupport (fun x ↦ f x ^ r) :=
hf.comp_left (g := (· ^ r)) (Real.zero_rpow hr)
end Real
/-!
## Comparing real and complex powers
-/
namespace Complex
theorem ofReal_cpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ) : ℂ) = (x : ℂ) ^ (y : ℂ) := by
simp only [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg hx, Complex.cpow_def, ofReal_eq_zero]; split_ifs <;>
simp [Complex.ofReal_log hx]
theorem ofReal_cpow_of_nonpos {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) (y : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ y = (-x : ℂ) ^ y * exp (π * I * y) := by
rcases hx.eq_or_lt with (rfl | hlt)
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy) <;> simp [*]
have hne : (x : ℂ) ≠ 0 := ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hlt.ne
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hne, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (neg_ne_zero.2 hne), ← exp_add, ← add_mul, log,
log, norm_neg, arg_ofReal_of_neg hlt, ← ofReal_neg, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg (neg_nonneg.2 hx),
ofReal_zero, zero_mul, add_zero]
lemma cpow_ofReal (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) :
x ^ (y : ℂ) = ↑(‖x‖ ^ y) * (Real.cos (arg x * y) + Real.sin (arg x * y) * I) := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with rfl | hx
· simp [ofReal_cpow le_rfl]
· rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hx, exp_eq_exp_re_mul_sin_add_cos, mul_comm (log x)]
norm_cast
rw [re_ofReal_mul, im_ofReal_mul, log_re, log_im, mul_comm y, mul_comm y, Real.exp_mul,
Real.exp_log]
rwa [norm_pos_iff]
lemma cpow_ofReal_re (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).re = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.cos (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.cos]
lemma cpow_ofReal_im (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : (x ^ (y : ℂ)).im = ‖x‖ ^ y * Real.sin (arg x * y) := by
rw [cpow_ofReal]; generalize arg x * y = z; simp [Real.sin]
theorem norm_cpow_of_ne_zero {z : ℂ} (hz : z ≠ 0) (w : ℂ) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rw [cpow_def_of_ne_zero hz, norm_exp, mul_re, log_re, log_im, Real.exp_sub,
Real.rpow_def_of_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hz)]
theorem norm_cpow_of_imp {z w : ℂ} (h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0) :
‖z ^ w‖ = ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with (hz | rfl) <;> [exact norm_cpow_of_ne_zero hz w; rw [norm_zero]]
rcases eq_or_ne w.re 0 with hw | hw
· simp [hw, h rfl hw]
· rw [Real.zero_rpow hw, zero_div, zero_cpow, norm_zero]
exact ne_of_apply_ne re hw
theorem norm_cpow_le (z w : ℂ) : ‖z ^ w‖ ≤ ‖z‖ ^ w.re / Real.exp (arg z * im w) := by
by_cases h : z = 0 → w.re = 0 → w = 0
· exact (norm_cpow_of_imp h).le
· push_neg at h
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_real (x : ℂ) (y : ℝ) : ‖x ^ (y : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem norm_cpow_inv_nat (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : ‖x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℂ)‖ = ‖x‖ ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) := by
rw [← norm_cpow_real]; simp
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℂ) : ‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ y.re := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx.ne'), arg_ofReal_of_nonneg hx.le,
zero_mul, Real.exp_zero, div_one, Complex.norm_of_nonneg hx.le]
theorem norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) {y : ℂ} (hy : re y ≠ 0) :
‖(x : ℂ) ^ y‖ = x ^ re y := by
rw [norm_cpow_of_imp] <;> simp [*, arg_ofReal_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonneg]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_ne_zero := norm_cpow_of_ne_zero
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_of_imp := norm_cpow_of_imp
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_le := norm_cpow_le
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_real := norm_cpow_real
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_inv_nat := norm_cpow_inv_nat
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-17")] alias abs_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg :=
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg
open Filter in
lemma norm_ofReal_cpow_eventually_eq_atTop (c : ℂ) :
(fun t : ℝ ↦ ‖(t : ℂ) ^ c‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun t ↦ t ^ c.re := by
filter_upwards [eventually_gt_atTop 0] with t ht
rw [norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos ht]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_re_ne_zero (n : ℕ) {s : ℂ} (hs : s.re ≠ 0) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_nonneg n.cast_nonneg hs]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) :
‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ = (n : ℝ) ^ (s.re) := by
rw [← ofReal_natCast, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _]
lemma norm_natCast_cpow_pos_of_pos {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (s : ℂ) : 0 < ‖(n : ℂ) ^ s‖ :=
(norm_natCast_cpow_of_pos hn _).symm ▸ Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (Nat.cast_pos.mpr hn) _
theorem cpow_mul_ofReal_nonneg {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (z : ℂ) :
(x : ℂ) ^ (↑y * z) = (↑(x ^ y) : ℂ) ^ z := by
rw [cpow_mul, ofReal_cpow hx]
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im, neg_lt_zero]; exact Real.pi_pos
· rw [← ofReal_log hx, ← ofReal_mul, ofReal_im]; exact Real.pi_pos.le
end Complex
/-! ### Positivity extension -/
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is positive (namely 1)
when the exponent is zero. The other cases are done in `evalRpow`. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (0 : ℝ)]
def evalRpowZero : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _ _ e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ (0 : ℝ)) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_zero_pos $a))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: exponentiation by a real number is nonnegative when
the base is nonnegative and positive when the base is positive. -/
@[positivity (_ : ℝ) ^ (_ : ℝ)]
def evalRpow : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q($a ^ ($b : ℝ)) =>
let ra ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a
assertInstancesCommute
match ra with
| .positive pa =>
pure (.positive q(Real.rpow_pos_of_pos $pa $b))
| .nonnegative pa =>
pure (.nonnegative q(Real.rpow_nonneg $pa $b))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.rpow"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
/-!
## Further algebraic properties of `rpow`
-/
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ} {n : ℕ}
theorem rpow_mul {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
rw [← Complex.ofReal_inj, Complex.ofReal_cpow (rpow_nonneg hx _),
Complex.ofReal_cpow hx, Complex.ofReal_mul, Complex.cpow_mul, Complex.ofReal_cpow hx] <;>
simp only [(Complex.ofReal_mul _ _).symm, (Complex.ofReal_log hx).symm, Complex.ofReal_im,
neg_lt_zero, pi_pos, le_of_lt pi_pos]
lemma rpow_pow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_zpow_comm {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : (x ^ y) ^ n = (x ^ n) ^ y := by
simp_rw [← rpow_intCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm y]
lemma rpow_add_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_def, rpow_def, Complex.ofReal_add,
Complex.cpow_add _ _ (Complex.ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hx), Complex.ofReal_intCast,
Complex.cpow_intCast, ← Complex.ofReal_zpow, mul_comm, Complex.re_ofReal_mul, mul_comm]
lemma rpow_add_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_sub_intCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_add_intCast hx y (-n)
lemma rpow_sub_natCast {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
simpa using rpow_sub_intCast hx y n
lemma rpow_add_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_add_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - n ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_natCast]
theorem rpow_add_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
theorem rpow_sub_one {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_sub_one' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (hx : 0 ≤ x) (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' hx h, rpow_one]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := by
rw [← rpow_natCast]
simp only [Nat.cast_ofNat]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by
suffices H : x ^ ((-1 : ℤ) : ℝ) = x⁻¹ by rwa [Int.cast_neg, Int.cast_one] at H
simp only [rpow_intCast, zpow_one, zpow_neg]
theorem mul_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
iterate 2 rw [Real.rpow_def_of_nonneg]; split_ifs with h_ifs <;> simp_all
· rw [log_mul ‹_› ‹_›, add_mul, exp_add, rpow_def_of_pos (hy.lt_of_ne' ‹_›)]
all_goals positivity
theorem inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
simp only [← rpow_neg_one, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_comm]
theorem div_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, mul_rpow hx (inv_nonneg.2 hy), inv_rpow hy]
theorem log_rpow {x : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (y : ℝ) : log (x ^ y) = y * log x := by
apply exp_injective
rw [exp_log (rpow_pos_of_pos hx y), ← exp_log hx, mul_comm, rpow_def_of_pos (exp_pos (log x)) y]
theorem mul_log_eq_log_iff {x y z : ℝ} (hx : 0 < x) (hz : 0 < z) :
y * log x = log z ↔ x ^ y = z :=
⟨fun h ↦ log_injOn_pos (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) hz <| log_rpow hx _ |>.trans h,
by rintro rfl; rw [log_rpow hx]⟩
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : y ≠ 0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, mul_inv_cancel₀ hn0, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
have hn0 : (n : ℝ) ≠ 0 := Nat.cast_ne_zero.2 hn
rw [← rpow_natCast, ← rpow_mul hx, inv_mul_cancel₀ hn0, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (hx : 0 ≤ x) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (hx : 0 ≤ x) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul hx, rpow_intCast]
/-! Note: lemmas about `(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r)` such as `Real.finset_prod_rpow` are proved
in `Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean` instead. -/
/-!
## Order and monotonicity
-/
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z := by
rw [le_iff_eq_or_lt] at hx; rcases hx with hx | hx
· rw [← hx, zero_rpow (ne_of_gt hz)]
exact rpow_pos_of_pos (by rwa [← hx] at hxy) _
· rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans hx hxy), exp_lt_exp]
exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_right (log_lt_log hx hxy) hz
theorem strictMonoOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_pos {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
StrictMonoOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow ha hab hr
@[gcongr, bound]
theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₁ with (rfl | h₁'); · rfl
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le h₂ with (rfl | h₂'); · simp
exact le_of_lt (rpow_lt_rpow h h₁' h₂')
theorem monotoneOn_rpow_Ici_of_exponent_nonneg {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
MonotoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ici 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow ha hab hr
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans hxy
rw [← inv_lt_inv₀, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_lt_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_pos.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z := by
have := hx.trans_le hxy
rw [← inv_le_inv₀, ← rpow_neg, ← rpow_neg]
on_goal 1 => refine rpow_le_rpow ?_ hxy (neg_nonneg.2 hz)
all_goals positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h => rpow_le_rpow hy h (le_of_lt hz), fun h => rpow_lt_rpow hx h hz⟩
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff hy hx hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
⟨lt_imp_lt_of_le_imp_le fun h ↦ rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx h hz.le,
fun h ↦ rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hy h hz⟩
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
le_iff_le_iff_lt_iff_lt.2 <| rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy hx hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hx _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff _ hy hz, rpow_inv_rpow] <;> positivity
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 ≤ x) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
lt_iff_lt_of_le_iff_le <| le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos hy hx hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg _ hx hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x := by
rw [← rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hy _ hz, rpow_inv_rpow _ hz.ne] <;> positivity
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_trans zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_pos_left hyz (log_pos hx)
@[gcongr]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hx)]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left hyz (log_nonneg hx)
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg {x y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y < x) (hz : z < 0) :
x ^ z < y ^ z := by
have hx : 0 < x := hy.trans hxy
rw [← neg_neg z, Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hx) (-z), Real.rpow_neg (le_of_lt hy) (-z),
inv_lt_inv₀ (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hy _)]
exact Real.rpow_lt_rpow (by positivity) hxy <| neg_pos_of_neg hz
theorem strictAntiOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_neg {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
StrictAntiOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg ha hab hr
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos {x y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) (hxy : y ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
x ^ z ≤ y ^ z := by
rcases ne_or_eq z 0 with hz_zero | rfl
case inl =>
rcases ne_or_eq x y with hxy' | rfl
case inl =>
exact le_of_lt <| rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_neg hy (Ne.lt_of_le (id (Ne.symm hxy')) hxy)
(Ne.lt_of_le hz_zero hz)
case inr => simp
case inr => simp
theorem antitoneOn_rpow_Ioi_of_exponent_nonpos {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≤ 0) :
AntitoneOn (fun (x : ℝ) => x ^ r) (Set.Ioi 0) :=
fun _ ha _ _ hab => rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_nonpos ha hab hr
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ y ≤ z := by
have x_pos : 0 < x := lt_trans zero_lt_one hx
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos y) (rpow_pos_of_pos x_pos z), log_rpow x_pos,
log_rpow x_pos, mul_le_mul_right (log_pos hx)]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff (hx : 1 < x) : x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ y < z := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff hx, lt_iff_not_le]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) : x ^ y < x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_lt_exp]; exact mul_lt_mul_of_neg_left hyz (log_neg hx0 hx1)
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) : x ^ y ≤ x ^ z := by
repeat' rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx0]
rw [exp_le_exp]; exact mul_le_mul_of_nonpos_left hyz (log_nonpos (le_of_lt hx0) hx1)
@[simp]
theorem rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z ↔ z ≤ y := by
rw [← log_le_log_iff (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 y) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx0 z), log_rpow hx0, log_rpow hx0,
mul_le_mul_right_of_neg (log_neg hx0 hx1)]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) :
x ^ y < x ^ z ↔ z < y := by
rw [lt_iff_not_le, rpow_le_rpow_left_iff_of_base_lt_one hx0 hx1, lt_iff_not_le]
theorem rpow_lt_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 ≤ x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem one_lt_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_lt_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z := by
rw [← one_rpow z]
exact rpow_le_rpow zero_le_one hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1) (hz : z < 0) :
1 < x ^ z := by
convert rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : z ≤ 0) :
1 ≤ x ^ z := by
convert rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx1 hx2 hz
exact (rpow_zero x).symm
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/Real.lean | 685 | 688 | theorem rpow_lt_one_iff_of_pos (hx : 0 < x) : x ^ y < 1 ↔ 1 < x ∧ y < 0 ∨ x < 1 ∧ 0 < y := by | rw [rpow_def_of_pos hx, exp_lt_one_iff, mul_neg_iff, log_pos_iff hx.le, log_neg_iff hx]
theorem rpow_lt_one_iff (hx : 0 ≤ x) : |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Simon Hudon
-/
import Batteries.Data.List.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.TypeStar
/-!
# The Following Are Equivalent
This file allows to state that all propositions in a list are equivalent. It is used by
`Mathlib.Tactic.Tfae`.
`TFAE l` means `∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x ↔ y`. This is equivalent to `Pairwise (↔) l`.
-/
namespace List
/-- TFAE: The Following (propositions) Are Equivalent.
The `tfae_have` and `tfae_finish` tactics can be useful in proofs with `TFAE` goals.
-/
def TFAE (l : List Prop) : Prop :=
∀ x ∈ l, ∀ y ∈ l, x ↔ y
theorem tfae_nil : TFAE [] :=
forall_mem_nil _
@[simp]
theorem tfae_singleton (p) : TFAE [p] := by simp [TFAE, -eq_iff_iff]
theorem tfae_cons_of_mem {a b} {l : List Prop} (h : b ∈ l) : TFAE (a :: l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ TFAE l :=
⟨fun H => ⟨H a (by simp) b (Mem.tail a h),
fun _ hp _ hq => H _ (Mem.tail a hp) _ (Mem.tail a hq)⟩,
by
rintro ⟨ab, H⟩ p (_ | ⟨_, hp⟩) q (_ | ⟨_, hq⟩)
· rfl
· exact ab.trans (H _ h _ hq)
· exact (ab.trans (H _ h _ hp)).symm
· exact H _ hp _ hq⟩
theorem tfae_cons_cons {a b} {l : List Prop} : TFAE (a :: b :: l) ↔ (a ↔ b) ∧ TFAE (b :: l) :=
tfae_cons_of_mem (Mem.head _)
@[simp]
theorem tfae_cons_self {a} {l : List Prop} : TFAE (a :: a :: l) ↔ TFAE (a :: l) := by
simp [tfae_cons_cons]
theorem tfae_of_forall (b : Prop) (l : List Prop) (h : ∀ a ∈ l, a ↔ b) : TFAE l :=
fun _a₁ h₁ _a₂ h₂ => (h _ h₁).trans (h _ h₂).symm
theorem tfae_of_cycle {a b} {l : List Prop} (h_chain : List.Chain (· → ·) a (b :: l))
(h_last : getLastD l b → a) : TFAE (a :: b :: l) := by
induction l generalizing a b with
| nil => simp_all [tfae_cons_cons, iff_def]
| cons c l IH =>
simp only [tfae_cons_cons, getLastD_cons, tfae_singleton, and_true, chain_cons, Chain.nil] at *
rcases h_chain with ⟨ab, ⟨bc, ch⟩⟩
have := IH ⟨bc, ch⟩ (ab ∘ h_last)
exact ⟨⟨ab, h_last ∘ (this.2 c (.head _) _ getLastD_mem_cons).1 ∘ bc⟩, this⟩
| Mathlib/Data/List/TFAE.lean | 63 | 71 | theorem TFAE.out {l} (h : TFAE l) (n₁ n₂ : Nat) {a b}
(h₁ : l[n₁]? = some a := by | rfl)
(h₂ : l[n₂]? = some b := by rfl) :
a ↔ b :=
h _ (List.mem_of_getElem? h₁) _ (List.mem_of_getElem? h₂)
/-- If `P₁ x ↔ ... ↔ Pₙ x` for all `x`, then `(∀ x, P₁ x) ↔ ... ↔ (∀ x, Pₙ x)`.
Note: in concrete cases, Lean has trouble finding the list `[P₁, ..., Pₙ]` from the list
`[(∀ x, P₁ x), ..., (∀ x, Pₙ x)]`, but simply providing a list of underscores with the right |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.List
/-!
# Countable sets
In this file we define `Set.Countable s` as `Countable s`
and prove basic properties of this definition.
Note that this definition does not provide a computable encoding.
For a noncomputable conversion to `Encodable s`, use `Set.Countable.nonempty_encodable`.
## Keywords
sets, countable set
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Multiset.sort
noncomputable section
open Function Set Encodable
universe u v w x
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Sort x}
namespace Set
/-- A set `s` is countable if the corresponding subtype is countable,
i.e., there exists an injective map `f : s → ℕ`.
Note that this is an abbreviation, so `hs : Set.Countable s` in the proof context
is the same as an instance `Countable s`.
For a constructive version, see `Encodable`.
-/
protected def Countable (s : Set α) : Prop := Countable s
@[simp]
theorem countable_coe_iff {s : Set α} : Countable s ↔ s.Countable := .rfl
/-- Prove `Set.Countable` from a `Countable` instance on the subtype. -/
theorem to_countable (s : Set α) [Countable s] : s.Countable := ‹_›
/-- Restate `Set.Countable` as a `Countable` instance. -/
alias ⟨_root_.Countable.to_set, Countable.to_subtype⟩ := countable_coe_iff
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_injective {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : s → ℕ, Injective f :=
countable_iff_exists_injective s
/-- A set `s : Set α` is countable if and only if there exists a function `α → ℕ` injective
on `s`. -/
theorem countable_iff_exists_injOn {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : α → ℕ, InjOn f s :=
Set.countable_iff_exists_injective.trans exists_injOn_iff_injective.symm
theorem countable_iff_nonempty_encodable {s : Set α} : s.Countable ↔ Nonempty (Encodable s) :=
Encodable.nonempty_encodable.symm
alias ⟨Countable.nonempty_encodable, _⟩ := countable_iff_nonempty_encodable
/-- Convert `Set.Countable s` to `Encodable s` (noncomputable). -/
protected def Countable.toEncodable {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) : Encodable s :=
Classical.choice hs.nonempty_encodable
section Enumerate
/-- Noncomputably enumerate elements in a set. The `default` value is used to extend the domain to
all of `ℕ`. -/
def enumerateCountable {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) : ℕ → α := fun n =>
match @Encodable.decode s h.toEncodable n with
| some y => y
| none => default
theorem subset_range_enumerate {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
s ⊆ range (enumerateCountable h default) := fun x hx =>
⟨@Encodable.encode s h.toEncodable ⟨x, hx⟩, by
letI := h.toEncodable
simp [enumerateCountable, Encodable.encodek]⟩
lemma range_enumerateCountable_subset {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) (default : α) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) ⊆ insert default s := by
refine range_subset_iff.mpr (fun n ↦ ?_)
rw [enumerateCountable]
match @decode s (Countable.toEncodable h) n with
| none => exact mem_insert _ _
| some val => simp
lemma range_enumerateCountable_of_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α}
(h_mem : default ∈ s) :
range (enumerateCountable h default) = s :=
subset_antisymm ((range_enumerateCountable_subset h _).trans_eq (insert_eq_of_mem h_mem))
(subset_range_enumerate h default)
lemma enumerateCountable_mem {s : Set α} (h : s.Countable) {default : α} (h_mem : default ∈ s)
(n : ℕ) :
enumerateCountable h default n ∈ s := by
convert mem_range_self n
exact (range_enumerateCountable_of_mem h h_mem).symm
end Enumerate
theorem Countable.mono {s₁ s₂ : Set α} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hs : s₂.Countable) : s₁.Countable :=
have := hs.to_subtype; (inclusion_injective h).countable
theorem countable_range [Countable ι] (f : ι → β) : (range f).Countable :=
surjective_onto_range.countable.to_set
theorem countable_iff_exists_subset_range [Nonempty α] {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → α, s ⊆ range f :=
⟨fun h => by
inhabit α
exact ⟨enumerateCountable h default, subset_range_enumerate _ _⟩, fun ⟨f, hsf⟩ =>
(countable_range f).mono hsf⟩
/-- A non-empty set is countable iff there exists a surjection from the
natural numbers onto the subtype induced by the set.
-/
protected theorem countable_iff_exists_surjective {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) :
s.Countable ↔ ∃ f : ℕ → s, Surjective f :=
@countable_iff_exists_surjective s hs.to_subtype
alias ⟨Countable.exists_surjective, _⟩ := Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective
theorem countable_univ_iff : (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Countable α :=
countable_coe_iff.symm.trans (Equiv.Set.univ _).countable_iff
theorem countable_univ [Countable α] : (univ : Set α).Countable :=
to_countable univ
theorem not_countable_univ_iff : ¬ (univ : Set α).Countable ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [countable_univ_iff, not_countable_iff]
theorem not_countable_univ [Uncountable α] : ¬ (univ : Set α).Countable :=
not_countable_univ_iff.2 ‹_›
/-- If `s : Set α` is a nonempty countable set, then there exists a map
`f : ℕ → α` such that `s = range f`. -/
theorem Countable.exists_eq_range {s : Set α} (hc : s.Countable) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
∃ f : ℕ → α, s = range f := by
rcases hc.exists_surjective hs with ⟨f, hf⟩
refine ⟨(↑) ∘ f, ?_⟩
rw [hf.range_comp, Subtype.range_coe]
@[simp] theorem countable_empty : (∅ : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
@[simp] theorem countable_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).Countable := to_countable _
theorem Countable.image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (f : α → β) : (f '' s).Countable := by
rw [image_eq_range]
have := hs.to_subtype
apply countable_range
theorem MapsTo.countable_of_injOn {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β} (hf : MapsTo f s t)
(hf' : InjOn f s) (ht : t.Countable) : s.Countable :=
have := ht.to_subtype
have : Injective (hf.restrict f s t) := (injOn_iff_injective.1 hf').codRestrict _
this.countable
theorem Countable.preimage_of_injOn {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : InjOn f (f ⁻¹' s)) : (f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
(mapsTo_preimage f s).countable_of_injOn hf hs
protected theorem Countable.preimage {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
(f ⁻¹' s).Countable :=
hs.preimage_of_injOn hf.injOn
theorem exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable [CompleteLattice α] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∃ x, p x) :
(∃ s : ℕ → α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⨆ n, s n = ⊤) ↔
∃ S : Set α, S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ sSup S = ⊤ := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨s, hps, hs⟩
refine ⟨range s, countable_range s, forall_mem_range.2 hps, ?_⟩
rwa [sSup_range]
· rintro ⟨S, hSc, hps, hS⟩
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty S with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sSup_empty] at hS
haveI := subsingleton_of_bot_eq_top hS
rcases h with ⟨x, hx⟩
exact ⟨fun _ => x, fun _ => hx, Subsingleton.elim _ _⟩
· rcases (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective hne).1 hSc with ⟨s, hs⟩
refine ⟨fun n => s n, fun n => hps _ (s n).coe_prop, ?_⟩
rwa [hs.iSup_comp, ← sSup_eq_iSup']
theorem exists_seq_cover_iff_countable {p : Set α → Prop} (h : ∃ s, p s) :
(∃ s : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (s n)) ∧ ⋃ n, s n = univ) ↔
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧ ⋃₀ S = univ :=
exists_seq_iSup_eq_top_iff_countable h
theorem countable_of_injective_of_countable_image {s : Set α} {f : α → β} (hf : InjOn f s)
(hs : (f '' s).Countable) : s.Countable :=
(mapsTo_image _ _).countable_of_injOn hf hs
theorem countable_iUnion {t : ι → Set α} [Countable ι] (ht : ∀ i, (t i).Countable) :
(⋃ i, t i).Countable := by
have := fun i ↦ (ht i).to_subtype
rw [iUnion_eq_range_psigma]
apply countable_range
@[simp]
theorem countable_iUnion_iff [Countable ι] {t : ι → Set α} :
(⋃ i, t i).Countable ↔ ∀ i, (t i).Countable :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono <| subset_iUnion _ _, countable_iUnion⟩
theorem Countable.biUnion_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ a ∈ s, Set β} (hs : s.Countable) :
(⋃ a ∈ s, t a ‹_›).Countable ↔ ∀ a (ha : a ∈ s), (t a ha).Countable := by
have := hs.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, countable_iUnion_iff, SetCoe.forall']
theorem Countable.sUnion_iff {s : Set (Set α)} (hs : s.Countable) :
(⋃₀ s).Countable ↔ ∀ a ∈ s, a.Countable := by rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, hs.biUnion_iff]
alias ⟨_, Countable.biUnion⟩ := Countable.biUnion_iff
alias ⟨_, Countable.sUnion⟩ := Countable.sUnion_iff
@[simp]
theorem countable_union {s t : Set α} : (s ∪ t).Countable ↔ s.Countable ∧ t.Countable := by
simp [union_eq_iUnion, and_comm]
theorem Countable.union {s t : Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (ht : t.Countable) : (s ∪ t).Countable :=
countable_union.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem Countable.of_diff {s t : Set α} (h : (s \ t).Countable) (ht : t.Countable) : s.Countable :=
(h.union ht).mono (subset_diff_union _ _)
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Countable.lean | 235 | 238 | theorem countable_insert {s : Set α} {a : α} : (insert a s).Countable ↔ s.Countable := by | simp only [insert_eq, countable_union, countable_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem Countable.insert {s : Set α} (a : α) (h : s.Countable) : (insert a s).Countable := |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Scott Carnahan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Scott Carnahan
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.NatPowAssoc
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.SMul
/-!
# Scalar-multiple polynomial evaluation
This file defines polynomial evaluation via scalar multiplication. Our polynomials have
coefficients in a semiring `R`, and we evaluate at a weak form of `R`-algebra, namely an additive
commutative monoid with an action of `R` and a notion of natural number power. This
is a generalization of `Algebra.Polynomial.Eval`.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.smeval`: function for evaluating a polynomial with coefficients in a `Semiring`
`R` at an element `x` of an `AddCommMonoid` `S` that has natural number powers and an `R`-action.
* `smeval.linearMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-linear map, when `S` is an `R`-module.
* `smeval.algebraMap`: the `smeval` function as an `R`-algebra map, when `S` is an `R`-algebra.
## Main results
* `smeval_monomial`: monomials evaluate as we expect.
* `smeval_add`, `smeval_smul`: linearity of evaluation, given an `R`-module.
* `smeval_mul`, `smeval_comp`: multiplicativity of evaluation, given power-associativity.
* `eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval`, `leval_eq_smeval.linearMap`,
`aeval_eq_smeval`, etc.: comparisons
## TODO
* `smeval_neg` and `smeval_intCast` for `R` a ring and `S` an `AddCommGroup`.
* Nonunital evaluation for polynomials with vanishing constant term for `Pow S ℕ+` (different file?)
-/
namespace Polynomial
section MulActionWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R] (r : R) (p : R[X]) {S : Type*} [AddCommMonoid S] [Pow S ℕ]
[MulActionWithZero R S] (x : S)
/-- Scalar multiplication together with taking a natural number power. -/
def smul_pow : ℕ → R → S := fun n r => r • x^n
/-- Evaluate a polynomial `p` in the scalar semiring `R` at an element `x` in the target `S` using
scalar multiple `R`-action. -/
irreducible_def smeval : S := p.sum (smul_pow x)
theorem smeval_eq_sum : p.smeval x = p.sum (smul_pow x) := by rw [smeval_def]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_C : (C r).smeval x = r • x ^ 0 := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_C_index]
@[simp]
theorem smeval_monomial (n : ℕ) :
(monomial n r).smeval x = r • x ^ n := by
simp only [smeval_eq_sum, smul_pow, zero_smul, sum_monomial_index]
theorem eval_eq_smeval : p.eval r = p.smeval r := by
rw [eval_eq_sum, smeval_eq_sum]
rfl
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Smeval.lean | 69 | 74 | theorem eval₂_smulOneHom_eq_smeval (R : Type*) [Semiring R] {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module R S]
[IsScalarTower R S S] (p : R[X]) (x : S) :
p.eval₂ RingHom.smulOneHom x = p.smeval x := by | rw [smeval_eq_sum, eval₂_eq_sum]
congr 1 with e a
simp only [RingHom.smulOneHom_apply, smul_one_mul, smul_pow] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.Indicator
/-! # Functions integrable on a set and at a filter
We define `IntegrableOn f s μ := Integrable f (μ.restrict s)` and prove theorems like
`integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ`.
Next we define a predicate `IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → E) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α)`
saying that `f` is integrable at some set `s ∈ l` and prove that a measurable function is integrable
at `l` with respect to `μ` provided that `f` is bounded above at `l ⊓ ae μ` and `μ` is finite
at `l`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory Function
open scoped Topology Interval Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory
variable {α β ε E F : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [ENorm ε] [TopologicalSpace ε]
section
variable [TopologicalSpace β] {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function `f` is strongly measurable at a filter `l` w.r.t. a measure `μ` if it is
ae strongly measurable w.r.t. `μ.restrict s` for some `s ∈ l`. -/
def StronglyMeasurableAtFilter (f : α → β) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)
@[simp]
theorem stronglyMeasurableAt_bot {f : α → β} : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f ⊥ μ :=
⟨∅, mem_bot, by simp⟩
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.eventually (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
(eventually_smallSets' fun _ _ => AEStronglyMeasurable.mono_set).2 h
protected theorem StronglyMeasurableAtFilter.filter_mono (h : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ)
(h' : l' ≤ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l' μ :=
let ⟨s, hsl, hs⟩ := h
⟨s, h' hsl, hs⟩
protected theorem MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ]⟩
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem {s}
(h : AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) (hl : s ∈ l) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨s, hl, h⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-12")]
alias AeStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem :=
AEStronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_of_mem
protected theorem MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
(h : StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
h.aestronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
end
namespace MeasureTheory
section NormedAddCommGroup
theorem hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α}
{μ : Measure α} {C} (hs : μ s < ∞) (hf : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C) :
HasFiniteIntegral f (μ.restrict s) :=
haveI : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨by rwa [Measure.restrict_apply_univ]⟩
hasFiniteIntegral_of_bounded hf
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] {f g : α → E} {s t : Set α} {μ ν : Measure α}
/-- A function is `IntegrableOn` a set `s` if it is almost everywhere strongly measurable on `s`
and if the integral of its pointwise norm over `s` is less than infinity. -/
def IntegrableOn (f : α → ε) (s : Set α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable f (μ.restrict s)
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : Integrable f (μ.restrict s) :=
h
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_empty : IntegrableOn f ∅ μ := by simp [IntegrableOn, integrable_zero_measure]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_univ : IntegrableOn f univ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, Measure.restrict_univ]
theorem integrableOn_zero : IntegrableOn (fun _ => (0 : E)) s μ :=
integrable_zero _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_const {C : E} : IntegrableOn (fun _ => C) s μ ↔ C = 0 ∨ μ s < ∞ :=
integrable_const_iff.trans <| by rw [isFiniteMeasure_restrict, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
theorem IntegrableOn.mono (h : IntegrableOn f t ν) (hs : s ⊆ t) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono hs hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono hst le_rfl
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_measure (h : IntegrableOn f s ν) (hμ : μ ≤ ν) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono (Subset.refl _) hμ
theorem IntegrableOn.mono_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.integrable.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_ae hst
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_set_ae (h : IntegrableOn f t μ) (hst : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set_ae hst.le
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun_ae (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
Integrable.congr h hst
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun_ae (hst : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] g) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst, fun h => h.congr_fun_ae hst.symm⟩
theorem IntegrableOn.congr_fun (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn g s μ :=
h.congr_fun_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' hs).2 (Eventually.of_forall hst))
theorem integrableOn_congr_fun (hst : EqOn f g s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn g s μ :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_fun hst hs, fun h => h.congr_fun hst.symm hs⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableOn (h : Integrable f μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ := h.restrict
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t) := by
dsimp only [IntegrableOn] at h ⊢
exact h.mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_mono_measure Measure.restrict_le_self _
theorem IntegrableOn.inter_of_restrict (h : IntegrableOn f s (μ.restrict t)) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∩ t) μ := by
have := h.mono_set (inter_subset_left (t := t))
rwa [IntegrableOn, μ.restrict_restrict_of_subset inter_subset_right] at this
lemma Integrable.piecewise [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hg : IntegrableOn g sᶜ μ) :
Integrable (s.piecewise f g) μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn] at hf hg
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf hg ⊢
exact MemLp.piecewise hs hf hg
theorem IntegrableOn.left_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f s μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_left
theorem IntegrableOn.right_of_union (h : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
h.mono_set subset_union_right
theorem IntegrableOn.union (hs : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : IntegrableOn f t μ) :
IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ :=
(hs.add_measure ht).mono_measure <| Measure.restrict_union_le _ _
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_union : IntegrableOn f (s ∪ t) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f t μ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.left_of_union, h.right_of_union⟩, fun h => h.1.union h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_singleton_iff {x : α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
IntegrableOn f {x} μ ↔ f x = 0 ∨ μ {x} < ∞ := by
have : f =ᵐ[μ.restrict {x}] fun _ => f x := by
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_singleton x)] with _ ha
simp only [mem_singleton_iff.1 ha]
rw [IntegrableOn, integrable_congr this, integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict,
lt_top_iff_ne_top]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_biUnion {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hf => simp [hf, or_imp, forall_and]
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finset_iUnion {s : Finset β} {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i ∈ s, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ :=
integrableOn_finite_biUnion s.finite_toSet
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_finite_iUnion [Finite β] {t : β → Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (⋃ i, t i) μ ↔ ∀ i, IntegrableOn f (t i) μ := by
cases nonempty_fintype β
simpa using @integrableOn_finset_iUnion _ _ _ _ _ f μ Finset.univ t
lemma IntegrableOn.finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Finset α} {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
rw [← s.toSet.biUnion_of_singleton]
simp [integrableOn_finset_iUnion, measure_lt_top]
lemma IntegrableOn.of_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {μ : Measure α} [IsFiniteMeasure μ]
{s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) {f : α → E} : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simpa using IntegrableOn.finset (s := hs.toFinset)
theorem IntegrableOn.add_measure (hμ : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hν : IntegrableOn f s ν) :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) := by
delta IntegrableOn; rw [Measure.restrict_add]; exact hμ.integrable.add_measure hν
@[simp]
theorem integrableOn_add_measure :
IntegrableOn f s (μ + ν) ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ ∧ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_right le_rfl), h.mono_measure (Measure.le_add_left le_rfl)⟩,
fun h => h.1.add_measure h.2⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, he.restrict_map, he.integrable_map_iff]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} {s : Set β} (hs : s ⊆ range e) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableOn_map_iff, he.map_comap, IntegrableOn,
Measure.restrict_restrict_of_subset hs]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableOn_range_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableOn f (range e) μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ e) (μ.comap e) := by
rw [he.integrableOn_iff_comap .rfl, preimage_range, integrableOn_univ]
theorem integrableOn_iff_comap_subtypeVal (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable (f ∘ (↑) : s → E) (μ.comap (↑)) := by
rw [← (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).integrableOn_range_iff_comap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem integrableOn_map_equiv [MeasurableSpace β] (e : α ≃ᵐ β) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure α}
{s : Set β} : IntegrableOn f s (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ := by
simp only [IntegrableOn, e.restrict_map, integrable_map_equiv e]
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_comp_preimage [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set β} :
IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) (e ⁻¹' s) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s ν :=
(h₁.restrict_preimage_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂
theorem MeasurePreserving.integrableOn_image [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β} {ν}
(h₁ : MeasurePreserving e μ ν) (h₂ : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {s : Set α} :
IntegrableOn f (e '' s) ν ↔ IntegrableOn (f ∘ e) s μ :=
((h₁.restrict_image_emb h₂ s).integrable_comp_emb h₂).symm
theorem integrable_indicator_iff (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f s μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableOn, Integrable, hasFiniteIntegral_iff_enorm,
enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, lintegral_indicator hs,
aestronglyMeasurable_indicator_iff hs]
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
(integrable_indicator_iff hs).2 h
@[fun_prop]
theorem Integrable.indicator (h : Integrable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
Integrable (indicator s f) μ :=
h.integrableOn.integrable_indicator hs
theorem IntegrableOn.indicator (h : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
IntegrableOn (indicator t f) s μ :=
Integrable.indicator h ht
theorem integrable_indicatorConstLp {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) (c : E) :
Integrable (indicatorConstLp p hs hμs c) μ := by
rw [integrable_congr indicatorConstLp_coeFn, integrable_indicator_iff hs, IntegrableOn,
integrable_const_iff, isFiniteMeasure_restrict]
exact .inr hμs
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and nonzero there, then the measurable hull of `s` is
well behaved: the restriction of the measure to `toMeasurable μ s` coincides with its restriction
to `s`. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.restrict_toMeasurable (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (h's : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 0) :
μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ s) = μ.restrict s := by
rcases exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ) with ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩
let v n := toMeasurable (μ.restrict s) { x | u n ≤ ‖f x‖ }
have A : ∀ n, μ (s ∩ v n) ≠ ∞ := by
intro n
rw [inter_comm, ← Measure.restrict_apply (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _),
measure_toMeasurable]
exact (hf.measure_norm_ge_lt_top (u_pos n)).ne
apply Measure.restrict_toMeasurable_of_cover _ A
intro x hx
have : 0 < ‖f x‖ := by simp only [h's x hx, norm_pos_iff, Ne, not_false_iff]
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < ‖f x‖ := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 _ this).exists
exact mem_iUnion.2 ⟨n, subset_toMeasurable _ _ hn.le⟩
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is null-measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_ae_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ t \ s → f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ := by
let u := { x ∈ s | f x ≠ 0 }
have hu : IntegrableOn f u μ := hf.mono_set fun x hx => hx.1
let v := toMeasurable μ u
have A : IntegrableOn f v μ := by
rw [IntegrableOn, hu.restrict_toMeasurable]
· exact hu
· intro x hx; exact hx.2
have B : IntegrableOn f (t \ v) μ := by
apply integrableOn_zero.congr
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_of_ae h't,
ae_restrict_mem₀ (ht.diff (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ u).nullMeasurableSet)] with x hxt hx
by_cases h'x : x ∈ s
· by_contra H
exact hx.2 (subset_toMeasurable μ u ⟨h'x, Ne.symm H⟩)
· exact (hxt ⟨hx.1, h'x⟩).symm
apply (A.union B).mono_set _
rw [union_diff_self]
exact subset_union_right
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s`, and vanishes on `t \ s`, then it is integrable on `t`
if `t` is measurable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.of_forall_diff_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : ∀ x ∈ t \ s, f x = 0) : IntegrableOn f t μ :=
hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero ht.nullMeasurableSet (Eventually.of_forall h't)
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes almost everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ := by
rw [← integrableOn_univ]
apply hf.of_ae_diff_eq_zero nullMeasurableSet_univ
filter_upwards [h't] with x hx h'x using hx h'x.2
/-- If a function is integrable on a set `s` and vanishes everywhere on its complement,
then it is integrable. -/
theorem IntegrableOn.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(h't : ∀ x, x ∉ s → f x = 0) : Integrable f μ :=
hf.integrable_of_ae_not_mem_eq_zero (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => h't x hx)
theorem integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset (h1s : support f ⊆ s) :
IntegrableOn f s μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.integrableOn⟩
refine h.integrable_of_forall_not_mem_eq_zero fun x hx => ?_
contrapose! hx
exact h1s (mem_support.2 hx)
theorem integrableOn_Lp_of_measure_ne_top {E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
(f : Lp E p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hμs : μ s ≠ ∞) : IntegrableOn f s μ := by
refine memLp_one_iff_integrable.mp ?_
have hμ_restrict_univ : (μ.restrict s) Set.univ < ∞ := by
simpa only [Set.univ_inter, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, lt_top_iff_ne_top]
haveI hμ_finite : IsFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) := ⟨hμ_restrict_univ⟩
exact ((Lp.memLp _).restrict s).mono_exponent hp
theorem Integrable.lintegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
calc
(∫⁻ x, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ x, ↑‖f x‖₊ ∂μ := lintegral_ofReal_le_lintegral_enorm f
_ < ∞ := hf.2
theorem IntegrableOn.setLIntegral_lt_top {f : α → ℝ} {s : Set α} (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ) :
(∫⁻ x in s, ENNReal.ofReal (f x) ∂μ) < ∞ :=
Integrable.lintegral_lt_top hf
/-- We say that a function `f` is *integrable at filter* `l` if it is integrable on some
set `s ∈ l`. Equivalently, it is eventually integrable on `s` in `l.smallSets`. -/
def IntegrableAtFilter (f : α → ε) (l : Filter α) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) :=
∃ s ∈ l, IntegrableOn f s μ
variable {l l' : Filter α}
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_map_iff [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) (μ.map e) ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l μ := by
simp_rw [IntegrableAtFilter, he.integrableOn_map_iff]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs⟩
· exact ⟨_, hs⟩
· exact ⟨e '' s, by rwa [mem_map, he.injective.preimage_image]⟩
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.integrableAtFilter_iff_comap [MeasurableSpace β] {e : α → β}
(he : MeasurableEmbedding e) {f : β → E} {μ : Measure β} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l.map e) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter (f ∘ e) l (μ.comap e) := by
simp_rw [← he.integrableAtFilter_map_iff, IntegrableAtFilter, he.map_comap]
constructor <;> rintro ⟨s, hs, int⟩
· exact ⟨s, hs, int.mono_measure <| μ.restrict_le_self⟩
· exact ⟨_, inter_mem hs range_mem_map, int.inter_of_restrict⟩
theorem Integrable.integrableAtFilter (h : Integrable f μ) (l : Filter α) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
⟨univ, Filter.univ_mem, integrableOn_univ.2 h⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.eventually (h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, IntegrableOn f s μ :=
Iff.mpr (eventually_smallSets' fun _s _t hst ht => ht.mono_set hst) h
theorem integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≥ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atBot μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Iic a) μ := by
refine ⟨fun ⟨s, hs, hi⟩ ↦ ?_, fun ⟨a, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨Iic a, Iic_mem_atBot a, ha⟩⟩
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := mem_atBot_sets.mp hs
exact ⟨t, hi.mono_set fun _ hx ↦ ht _ hx⟩
theorem integrableAtFilter_atTop_iff [Preorder α] [IsDirected α fun (x1 x2 : α) => x1 ≤ x2]
[Nonempty α] :
IntegrableAtFilter f atTop μ ↔ ∃ a, IntegrableOn f (Ici a) μ :=
integrableAtFilter_atBot_iff (α := αᵒᵈ)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.add {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f + g) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
rcases hg with ⟨t, tl, ht⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ t, inter_mem sl tl, ?_⟩
exact (hs.mono_set inter_subset_left).add (ht.mono_set inter_subset_right)
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.neg {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (-f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.neg⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sub {f g : α → E}
(hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (hg : IntegrableAtFilter g l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (f - g) l μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.smul {𝕜 : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup 𝕜] [SMulZeroClass 𝕜 E]
[IsBoundedSMul 𝕜 E] {f : α → E} (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (c : 𝕜) :
IntegrableAtFilter (c • f) l μ := by
rcases hf with ⟨s, sl, hs⟩
exact ⟨s, sl, hs.smul c⟩
protected theorem IntegrableAtFilter.norm (hf : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter (fun x => ‖f x‖) l μ :=
Exists.casesOn hf fun s hs ↦ ⟨s, hs.1, hs.2.norm⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.filter_mono (hl : l ≤ l') (hl' : IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
let ⟨s, hs, hsf⟩ := hl'
⟨s, hl hs, hsf⟩
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_left (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ l') μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_left
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_of_right (hl : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l' ⊓ l) μ :=
hl.filter_mono inf_le_right
@[simp]
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff {l : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊓ ae μ) μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ h.filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨t, ht, u, hu, rfl⟩, hf⟩
refine ⟨t, ht, hf.congr_set_ae <| eventuallyEq_set.2 ?_⟩
filter_upwards [hu] with x hx using (and_iff_left hx).symm
alias ⟨IntegrableAtFilter.of_inf_ae, _⟩ := IntegrableAtFilter.inf_ae_iff
@[simp]
theorem integrableAtFilter_top : IntegrableAtFilter f ⊤ μ ↔ Integrable f μ := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ h.integrableAtFilter ⊤⟩
obtain ⟨s, hsf, hs⟩ := h
exact (integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset fun _ _ ↦ hsf _).mp hs
theorem IntegrableAtFilter.sup_iff {l l' : Filter α} :
IntegrableAtFilter f (l ⊔ l') μ ↔ IntegrableAtFilter f l μ ∧ IntegrableAtFilter f l' μ := by
constructor
· exact fun h => ⟨h.filter_mono le_sup_left, h.filter_mono le_sup_right⟩
· exact fun ⟨⟨s, hsl, hs⟩, ⟨t, htl, ht⟩⟩ ↦ ⟨s ∪ t, union_mem_sup hsl htl, hs.union ht⟩
/-- If `μ` is a measure finite at filter `l` and `f` is a function such that its norm is bounded
above at `l`, then `f` is integrable at `l`. -/
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter {l : Filter α} [IsMeasurablyGenerated l]
(hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l)
(hf : l.IsBoundedUnder (· ≤ ·) (norm ∘ f)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ := by
obtain ⟨C, hC⟩ : ∃ C, ∀ᶠ s in l.smallSets, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖f x‖ ≤ C :=
hf.imp fun C hC => eventually_smallSets.2 ⟨_, hC, fun t => id⟩
rcases (hfm.eventually.and (hμ.eventually.and hC)).exists_measurable_mem_of_smallSets with
⟨s, hsl, hsm, hfm, hμ, hC⟩
refine ⟨s, hsl, ⟨hfm, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded hμ (C := C) ?_⟩⟩
rw [ae_restrict_eq hsm, eventually_inf_principal]
exact Eventually.of_forall hC
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f (l ⊓ ae μ) (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
(hμ.inf_of_left.integrableAtFilter (hfm.filter_mono inf_le_left)
hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le).of_inf_ae
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter_ae :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto_ae
theorem Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto {l : Filter α}
[IsMeasurablyGenerated l] (hfm : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ) (hμ : μ.FiniteAtFilter l) {b}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ :=
hμ.integrableAtFilter hfm hf.norm.isBoundedUnder_le
alias _root_.Filter.Tendsto.integrableAtFilter :=
Measure.FiniteAtFilter.integrableAtFilter_of_tendsto
lemma Measure.integrableOn_of_bounded (s_finite : μ s ≠ ∞) (f_mble : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
{M : ℝ} (f_bdd : ∀ᵐ a ∂(μ.restrict s), ‖f a‖ ≤ M) :
IntegrableOn f s μ :=
⟨f_mble.restrict, hasFiniteIntegral_restrict_of_bounded (C := M) s_finite.lt_top f_bdd⟩
theorem integrable_add_of_disjoint {f g : α → E} (h : Disjoint (support f) (support g))
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
Integrable (f + g) μ ↔ Integrable f μ ∧ Integrable g μ := by
refine ⟨fun hfg => ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h => h.1.add h.2⟩
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_left h]; exact hfg.indicator hf.measurableSet_support
· rw [← indicator_add_eq_right h]; exact hfg.indicator hg.measurableSet_support
/-- If a function converges along a filter to a limit `a`, is integrable along this filter, and
all elements of the filter have infinite measure, then the limit has to vanish. -/
lemma IntegrableAtFilter.eq_zero_of_tendsto
(h : IntegrableAtFilter f l μ) (h' : ∀ s ∈ l, μ s = ∞) {a : E}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 a)) : a = 0 := by
by_contra H
obtain ⟨ε, εpos, hε⟩ : ∃ (ε : ℝ), 0 < ε ∧ ε < ‖a‖ := exists_between (norm_pos_iff.mpr H)
rcases h with ⟨u, ul, hu⟩
let v := u ∩ {b | ε < ‖f b‖}
have hv : IntegrableOn f v μ := hu.mono_set inter_subset_left
have vl : v ∈ l := inter_mem ul ((tendsto_order.1 hf.norm).1 _ hε)
have : μ.restrict v v < ∞ := lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right)
(Integrable.measure_gt_lt_top hv.norm εpos)
have : μ v ≠ ∞ := ne_of_lt (by simpa only [Measure.restrict_apply_self])
exact this (h' v vl)
end NormedAddCommGroup
end MeasureTheory
open MeasureTheory
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere measurable with respect to
`μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aemeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
classical
nontriviality α; inhabit α
have : (Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default) =ᵐ[μ.restrict s] f := piecewise_ae_eq_restrict hs
refine ⟨Set.piecewise s f fun _ => f default, ?_, this.symm⟩
apply measurable_of_isOpen
intro t ht
obtain ⟨u, u_open, hu⟩ : ∃ u : Set α, IsOpen u ∧ f ⁻¹' t ∩ s = u ∩ s :=
_root_.continuousOn_iff'.1 hf t ht
rw [piecewise_preimage, Set.ite, hu]
exact (u_open.measurableSet.inter hs).union ((measurable_const ht.measurableSet).diff hs)
/-- A function which is continuous on a separable set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s)
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, hf.isSeparable_image h's, ?_⟩
exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
/-- A function which is continuous on a set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable with
respect to `μ.restrict s` when either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
{f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
borelize β
refine
aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable.2
⟨hf.aemeasurable hs, f '' s, ?_,
mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict hs) (subset_preimage_image _ _)⟩
cases h.out
· rw [image_eq_range]
exact isSeparable_range <| continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict.1 hf
· exact .of_separableSpace _
/-- A function which is continuous on a compact set `s` is almost everywhere strongly measurable
with respect to `μ.restrict s`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : IsCompact s) (h's : MeasurableSet s) :
AEStronglyMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
borelize β
rw [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.aemeasurable h's, f '' s, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact (hs.image_of_continuousOn hf).isSeparable
· exact mem_of_superset (self_mem_ae_restrict h's) (subset_preimage_image _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin_of_isSeparable [TopologicalSpace α]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
{a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h't : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter
⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isSeparable ht h't⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem ContinuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin [TopologicalSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {a : α} {t : Set α} {f : α → E} (hft : ContinuousOn f t)
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (ha : a ∈ t) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝[t] a) μ :=
haveI : (𝓝[t] a).IsMeasurablyGenerated := ht.nhdsWithin_isMeasurablyGenerated _
(hft a ha).integrableAtFilter ⟨_, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hft.aestronglyMeasurable ht⟩
(μ.finiteAt_nhdsWithin _ _)
theorem Continuous.integrableAt_nhds [TopologicalSpace α] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α E]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α} [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {f : α → E}
(hf : Continuous f) (a : α) : IntegrableAtFilter f (𝓝 a) μ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
exact hf.continuousOn.integrableAt_nhdsWithin MeasurableSet.univ (mem_univ a)
/-- If a function is continuous on an open set `s`, then it is strongly measurable at the filter
`𝓝 x` for all `x ∈ s` if either the source space or the target space is second-countable. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ := fun _x hx =>
⟨s, IsOpen.mem_nhds hs hx, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs.measurableSet⟩
theorem ContinuousAt.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α E] {f : α → E} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α} (hs : IsOpen s)
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) : ∀ x ∈ s, StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝 x) μ :=
ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter hs <| continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt hf
theorem Continuous.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (μ : Measure α) (l : Filter α) : StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f l μ :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter
/-- If a function is continuous on a measurable set `s`, then it is measurable at the filter
`𝓝[s] x` for all `x`. -/
theorem ContinuousOn.stronglyMeasurableAtFilter_nhdsWithin {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α]
[TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} {μ : Measure α}
(hf : ContinuousOn f s) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (x : α) :
StronglyMeasurableAtFilter f (𝓝[s] x) μ :=
⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, hf.aestronglyMeasurable hs⟩
/-! ### Lemmas about adding and removing interval boundaries
The primed lemmas take explicit arguments about the measure being finite at the endpoint, while
the unprimed ones use `[NoAtoms μ]`.
-/
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [MeasurableSingletonClass α] {f : α → E} {μ : Measure α} {a b : α}
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· rw [← Ioc_union_left hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr ha.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Icc_eq_empty hab, Ioc_eq_empty]
contrapose! hab
exact hab.le
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a ≤ b
· rw [← Ico_union_right hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Icc_eq_empty hab, Ico_eq_empty]
contrapose! hab
exact hab.le
theorem integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· rw [← Ioo_union_left hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr ha.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty hab, Ico_eq_empty hab]
theorem integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
by_cases hab : a < b
· rw [← Ioo_union_right hab, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty hab, Ioc_eq_empty hab]
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (ha : μ {a} ≠ ∞) (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by
rw [integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' ha, integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' hb]
theorem integrableOn_Ici_iff_integrableOn_Ioi' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Ici b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioi b) μ := by
rw [← Ioi_union_left, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
theorem integrableOn_Iic_iff_integrableOn_Iio' (hb : μ {b} ≠ ∞) :
IntegrableOn f (Iic b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Iio b) μ := by
rw [← Iio_union_right, integrableOn_union,
eq_true (integrableOn_singleton_iff.mpr <| Or.inr hb.lt_top), and_true]
variable [NoAtoms μ]
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ico' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Ico a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Ico_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntegrableOn.lean | 712 | 719 | theorem integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Ioc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ :=
integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo' (by rw [measure_singleton]; exact ENNReal.zero_ne_top)
theorem integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo :
IntegrableOn f (Icc a b) μ ↔ IntegrableOn f (Ioo a b) μ := by | rw [integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc, integrableOn_Ioc_iff_integrableOn_Ioo] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Analytic.Constructions
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Analytic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Bilinear
/-!
# Multiplicative operations on derivatives
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
* multiplication of a function by a scalar function
* product of finitely many scalar functions
* taking the pointwise multiplicative inverse (i.e. `Inv.inv` or `Ring.inverse`) of a function
-/
open Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Topology
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {f : E → F}
variable {f' : E →L[𝕜] F}
variable {x : E}
variable {s : Set E}
section CLMCompApply
/-! ### Derivative of the pointwise composition/application of continuous linear maps -/
variable {H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H] {c : E → G →L[𝕜] H}
{c' : E →L[𝕜] G →L[𝕜] H} {d : E → F →L[𝕜] G} {d' : E →L[𝕜] F →L[𝕜] G} {u : E → G} {u' : E →L[𝕜] G}
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
split proof term into steps to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_comp (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') x := by
have := isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, d x)
have := this.comp x (hc.prodMk hd)
exact this
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(hd : HasFDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') s x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasFDerivAt (c x, d x) :).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (hc.prodMk hd)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.clm_comp (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => (c y).comp (d y))
((compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp d' + ((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp c') x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_comp.hasFDerivAt (c x, d x) :).comp x <| hc.prodMk hd
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hd : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 d s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).clm_comp (hd x hx)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.clm_comp (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hd : Differentiable 𝕜 d) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => (c y).comp (d y) := fun x => (hc x).clm_comp (hd x)
theorem fderivWithin_clm_comp (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) s x =
(compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 d s x) +
((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_clm_comp (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => (c y).comp (d y)) x =
(compL 𝕜 F G H (c x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 d x) +
((compL 𝕜 F G H).flip (d x)).comp (fderiv 𝕜 c x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_comp hd.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.clm_apply (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x)
(hu : HasStrictFDerivAt u u' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, u x)).comp x (hc.prodMk hu)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(hu : HasFDerivWithinAt u u' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) s x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasFDerivAt (c x, u x) :).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hc.prodMk hu)
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.clm_apply (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hu : HasFDerivAt u u' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => (c y) (u y)) ((c x).comp u' + c'.flip (u x)) x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_apply.hasFDerivAt (c x, u x) :).comp x (hc.prodMk hu)
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hu : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 u s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hu : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 u s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).clm_apply (hu x hx)
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.clm_apply (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hu : Differentiable 𝕜 u) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => (c y) (u y) := fun x => (hc x).clm_apply (hu x)
theorem fderivWithin_clm_apply (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (hu : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 u s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) s x =
(c x).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 u s x) + (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).flip (u x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_clm_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hu : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 u x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => (c y) (u y)) x = (c x).comp (fderiv 𝕜 u x) + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).flip (u x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.clm_apply hu.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
end CLMCompApply
section ContinuousMultilinearApplyConst
/-! ### Derivative of the application of continuous multilinear maps to a constant -/
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι]
{M : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (M i)] [∀ i, NormedSpace 𝕜 (M i)]
{H : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup H] [NormedSpace 𝕜 H]
{c : E → ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 M H}
{c' : E →L[𝕜] ContinuousMultilinearMap 𝕜 M H}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) : HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) s x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y ↦ (c y) u) (c'.flipMultilinear u) x :=
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.apply 𝕜 M H u).hasFDerivAt.comp x hc
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s)
(u : ∀ i, M i) : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s :=
fun x hx ↦ (hc x hx).continuousMultilinear_apply_const u
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y ↦ (c y) u := fun x ↦ (hc x).continuousMultilinear_apply_const u
theorem fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x = ((fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).flipMultilinear u) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (u : ∀ i, M i) :
(fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) = (fderiv 𝕜 c x).flipMultilinear u :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.continuousMultilinear_apply_const u).fderiv
/-- Application of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` to a constant commutes with `fderivWithin`. -/
theorem fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (u : ∀ i, M i) (m : E) :
(fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) s x) m = (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x) m u := by
simp [fderivWithin_continuousMultilinear_apply_const hxs hc]
/-- Application of a `ContinuousMultilinearMap` to a constant commutes with `fderiv`. -/
theorem fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const_apply (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x)
(u : ∀ i, M i) (m : E) :
(fderiv 𝕜 (fun y ↦ (c y) u) x) m = (fderiv 𝕜 c x) m u := by
simp [fderiv_continuousMultilinear_apply_const hc]
end ContinuousMultilinearApplyConst
section SMul
/-! ### Derivative of the product of a scalar-valued function and a vector-valued function
If `c` is a differentiable scalar-valued function and `f` is a differentiable vector-valued
function, then `fun x ↦ c x • f x` is differentiable as well. Lemmas in this section works for
function `c` taking values in the base field, as well as in a normed algebra over the base
field: e.g., they work for `c : E → ℂ` and `f : E → F` provided that `F` is a complex
normed vector space.
-/
variable {𝕜' : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F]
variable {c : E → 𝕜'} {c' : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x :=
(isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasStrictFDerivAt (c x, f x)).comp x <| hc.prodMk hf
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hf : HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) s x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (c x, f x) :).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <|
hc.prodMk hf
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.smul (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hf : HasFDerivAt f f' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f y) (c x • f' + c'.smulRight (f x)) x := by
exact (isBoundedBilinearMap_smul.hasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (c x, f x) :).comp x <| hc.prodMk hf
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.smul (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (hf : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).smul (hf x hx)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.smul (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (hf : Differentiable 𝕜 f) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c y • f y := fun x => (hc x).smul (hf x)
theorem fderivWithin_smul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hf : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) s x =
c x • fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x + (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul hf.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_smul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hf : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f y) x = c x • fderiv 𝕜 f x + (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smulRight (f x) :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul hf.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) x := by
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasStrictFDerivAt_const f x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.smul_const (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (f : F) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) s x := by
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasFDerivWithinAt_const f x s)
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.smul_const (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (f : F) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y • f) (c'.smulRight f) x := by
simpa only [smul_zero, zero_add] using hc.smul (hasFDerivAt_const f x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.smul_const (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f) s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul_const f).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.smul_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f) x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul_const f).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.smul_const (hc : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 c s) (f : F) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f) s := fun x hx => (hc x hx).smul_const f
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.smul_const (hc : Differentiable 𝕜 c) (f : F) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => c y • f := fun x => (hc x).smul_const f
theorem fderivWithin_smul_const (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (f : F) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x).smulRight f :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.smul_const f).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_smul_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (f : F) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y • f) x = (fderiv 𝕜 c x).smulRight f :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.smul_const f).fderiv
end SMul
section Mul
/-! ### Derivative of the product of two functions -/
variable {𝔸 𝔸' : Type*} [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedCommRing 𝔸'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸']
{a b : E → 𝔸} {a' b' : E →L[𝕜] 𝔸} {c d : E → 𝔸'} {c' d' : E →L[𝕜] 𝔸'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul' {x : E} (ha : HasStrictFDerivAt a a' x)
(hb : HasStrictFDerivAt b b' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => a y * b y) (a x • b' + a'.smulRight (b x)) x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).isBoundedBilinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt (a x, b x)).comp x
(ha.prodMk hb)
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasStrictFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x := by
convert hc.mul' hd
ext z
apply mul_comm
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mul' (ha : HasFDerivWithinAt a a' s x) (hb : HasFDerivWithinAt b b' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => a y * b y) (a x • b' + a'.smulRight (b x)) s x := by
exact ((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).isBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt
(a x, b x)).comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x (ha.prodMk hb)
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mul (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (hd : HasFDerivWithinAt d d' s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') s x := by
convert hc.mul' hd
ext z
apply mul_comm
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6024
`by exact` to solve unification issues. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.mul' (ha : HasFDerivAt a a' x) (hb : HasFDerivAt b b' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => a y * b y) (a x • b' + a'.smulRight (b x)) x := by
exact ((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).isBoundedBilinearMap.hasFDerivAt
(a x, b x)).comp x (ha.prodMk hb)
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.mul (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (hd : HasFDerivAt d d' x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y * d y) (c x • d' + d x • c') x := by
convert hc.mul' hd
ext z
apply mul_comm
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mul (ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x)
(hb : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 b s x) : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b y) s x :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul' hb.hasFDerivWithinAt).differentiableWithinAt
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.mul (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (hb : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 b x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b y) x :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.mul' hb.hasFDerivAt).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.mul (ha : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 a s) (hb : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 b s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b y) s := fun x hx => (ha x hx).mul (hb x hx)
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.mul (ha : Differentiable 𝕜 a) (hb : Differentiable 𝕜 b) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => a y * b y := fun x => (ha x).mul (hb x)
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.pow (ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x) :
∀ n : ℕ, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun x => a x ^ n) s x
| 0 => by simp only [pow_zero, differentiableWithinAt_const]
| n + 1 => by simp only [pow_succ', DifferentiableWithinAt.pow ha n, ha.mul]
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.pow (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (n : ℕ) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun x => a x ^ n) x :=
differentiableWithinAt_univ.mp <| ha.differentiableWithinAt.pow n
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.pow (ha : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 a s) (n : ℕ) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => a x ^ n) s := fun x h => (ha x h).pow n
@[simp, fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.pow (ha : Differentiable 𝕜 a) (n : ℕ) : Differentiable 𝕜 fun x => a x ^ n :=
fun x => (ha x).pow n
theorem fderivWithin_mul' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x)
(hb : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 b s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b y) s x =
a x • fderivWithin 𝕜 b s x + (fderivWithin 𝕜 a s x).smulRight (b x) :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul' hb.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderivWithin_mul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x)
(hd : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 d s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y * d y) s x =
c x • fderivWithin 𝕜 d s x + d x • fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul hd.hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_mul' (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (hb : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 b x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b y) x = a x • fderiv 𝕜 b x + (fderiv 𝕜 a x).smulRight (b x) :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.mul' hb.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
theorem fderiv_mul (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (hd : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 d x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y * d y) x = c x • fderiv 𝕜 d x + d x • fderiv 𝕜 c x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.mul hd.hasFDerivAt).fderiv
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul_const' (ha : HasStrictFDerivAt a a' x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => a y * b) (a'.smulRight b) x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).flip b).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.mul_const (hc : HasStrictFDerivAt c c' x) (d : 𝔸') :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => c y * d) (d • c') x := by
convert hc.mul_const' d
ext z
apply mul_comm
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mul_const' (ha : HasFDerivWithinAt a a' s x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => a y * b) (a'.smulRight b) s x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).flip b).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.mul_const (hc : HasFDerivWithinAt c c' s x) (d : 𝔸') :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => c y * d) (d • c') s x := by
convert hc.mul_const' d
ext z
apply mul_comm
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.mul_const' (ha : HasFDerivAt a a' x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => a y * b) (a'.smulRight b) x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸).flip b).hasFDerivAt.comp x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.mul_const (hc : HasFDerivAt c c' x) (d : 𝔸') :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => c y * d) (d • c') x := by
convert hc.mul_const' d
ext z
apply mul_comm
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.mul_const (ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b) s x :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul_const' b).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.mul_const (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b) x :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.mul_const' b).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.mul_const (ha : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 a s) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b) s := fun x hx => (ha x hx).mul_const b
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.mul_const (ha : Differentiable 𝕜 a) (b : 𝔸) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => a y * b := fun x => (ha x).mul_const b
theorem fderivWithin_mul_const' (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x) (b : 𝔸) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b) s x = (fderivWithin 𝕜 a s x).smulRight b :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul_const' b).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderivWithin_mul_const (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hc : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 c s x) (d : 𝔸') :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => c y * d) s x = d • fderivWithin 𝕜 c s x :=
(hc.hasFDerivWithinAt.mul_const d).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_mul_const' (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (b : 𝔸) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => a y * b) x = (fderiv 𝕜 a x).smulRight b :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.mul_const' b).fderiv
theorem fderiv_mul_const (hc : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 c x) (d : 𝔸') :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => c y * d) x = d • fderiv 𝕜 c x :=
(hc.hasFDerivAt.mul_const d).fderiv
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.const_mul (ha : HasStrictFDerivAt a a' x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun y => b * a y) (b • a') x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸) b).hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.const_mul (ha : HasFDerivWithinAt a a' s x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun y => b * a y) (b • a') s x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸) b).hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.const_mul (ha : HasFDerivAt a a' x) (b : 𝔸) :
HasFDerivAt (fun y => b * a y) (b • a') x :=
((ContinuousLinearMap.mul 𝕜 𝔸) b).hasFDerivAt.comp x ha
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableWithinAt.const_mul (ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (fun y => b * a y) s x :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_mul b).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableAt.const_mul (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (fun y => b * a y) x :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.const_mul b).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem DifferentiableOn.const_mul (ha : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 a s) (b : 𝔸) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun y => b * a y) s := fun x hx => (ha x hx).const_mul b
@[fun_prop]
theorem Differentiable.const_mul (ha : Differentiable 𝕜 a) (b : 𝔸) :
Differentiable 𝕜 fun y => b * a y := fun x => (ha x).const_mul b
theorem fderivWithin_const_mul (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(ha : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 a s x) (b : 𝔸) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun y => b * a y) s x = b • fderivWithin 𝕜 a s x :=
(ha.hasFDerivWithinAt.const_mul b).fderivWithin hxs
theorem fderiv_const_mul (ha : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 a x) (b : 𝔸) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun y => b * a y) x = b • fderiv 𝕜 a x :=
(ha.hasFDerivAt.const_mul b).fderiv
end Mul
section Prod
/-! ### Derivative of a finite product of functions -/
variable {ι : Type*} {𝔸 𝔸' : Type*} [NormedRing 𝔸] [NormedCommRing 𝔸'] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸]
[NormedAlgebra 𝕜 𝔸'] {u : Finset ι} {f : ι → E → 𝔸} {f' : ι → E →L[𝕜] 𝔸} {g : ι → E → 𝔸'}
{g' : ι → E →L[𝕜] 𝔸'}
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod' [Fintype ι] {l : List ι} {x : ι → 𝔸} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (l.map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj l[i]) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x := by
induction l with
| nil => simp [hasStrictFDerivAt_const]
| cons a l IH =>
simp only [List.map_cons, List.prod_cons, ← proj_apply (R := 𝕜) (φ := fun _ : ι ↦ 𝔸) a]
exact .congr_fderiv (.mul' (ContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt _) IH)
(by ext; simp [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Finset.mul_sum, mul_assoc, add_comm])
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange' {n : ℕ} {x : Fin n → 𝔸} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ ((List.finRange n).map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin n, (((List.finRange n).take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj i) (((List.finRange n).drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod'.congr_fderiv <|
Finset.sum_equiv (finCongr List.length_finRange) (by simp) (by simp [Fin.forall_iff])
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod_attach' {l : List ι} {x : {i // i ∈ l} → 𝔸} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (l.attach.map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.attach.take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj l.attach[i.cast List.length_attach.symm])
((l.attach.drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x := by
classical exact hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod'.congr_fderiv <| Eq.symm <|
Finset.sum_equiv (finCongr List.length_attach.symm) (by simp) (by simp)
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_list_prod' [Fintype ι] {l : List ι} {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (l.map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj l[i]) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod'.hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange' {n : ℕ} {x : Fin n → 𝔸} :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ ((List.finRange n).map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin n, (((List.finRange n).take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj i) (((List.finRange n).drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x :=
(hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange').hasFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_list_prod_attach' {l : List ι} {x : {i // i ∈ l} → 𝔸} :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (l.attach.map x).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.attach.take i).map x).prod •
smulRight (proj l.attach[i.cast List.length_attach.symm])
((l.attach.drop (.succ i)).map x).prod) x := by
classical exact hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod_attach'.hasFDerivAt
/--
Auxiliary lemma for `hasStrictFDerivAt_multiset_prod`.
For `NormedCommRing 𝔸'`, can rewrite as `Multiset` using `Multiset.prod_coe`.
-/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {l : List ι} {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (l.map x).prod)
(l.map fun i ↦ ((l.erase i).map x).prod • proj i).sum x := by
refine hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod'.congr_fderiv ?_
conv_rhs => arg 1; arg 2; rw [← List.finRange_map_get l]
simp only [List.map_map, ← List.sum_toFinset _ (List.nodup_finRange _), List.toFinset_finRange,
Function.comp_def, ((List.erase_getElem _).map _).prod_eq, List.eraseIdx_eq_take_drop_succ,
List.map_append, List.prod_append, List.get_eq_getElem, Fin.getElem_fin, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
exact Finset.sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ by
ext; simp only [smul_apply, smulRight_apply, smul_eq_mul]; ring
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (u.map x).prod)
(u.map (fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map x).prod • proj i)).sum x :=
u.inductionOn fun l ↦ by simpa using hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (fun x ↦ (u.map x).prod)
(Multiset.sum (u.map (fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map x).prod • proj i))) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_multiset_prod.hasFDerivAt
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (∏ i ∈ u, · i) (∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, x j) • proj i) x := by
simp only [Finset.sum_eq_multiset_sum, Finset.prod_eq_multiset_prod]
exact hasStrictFDerivAt_multiset_prod
theorem hasFDerivAt_finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] {x : ι → 𝔸'} :
HasFDerivAt (𝕜 := 𝕜) (∏ i ∈ u, · i) (∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, x j) • proj i) x :=
hasStrictFDerivAt_finset_prod.hasFDerivAt
section Comp
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.list_prod' {l : List ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ l, HasStrictFDerivAt (f i ·) (f' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x ↦ (l.map (f · x)).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map (f · x)).prod •
smulRight (f' l[i]) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map (f · x)).prod) x := by
simp_rw [Fin.getElem_fin, ← l.get_eq_getElem, ← List.finRange_map_get l, List.map_map]
-- After #19108, we have to be optimistic with `:)`s; otherwise Lean decides it need to find
-- `NormedAddCommGroup (List 𝔸)` which is nonsense.
refine .congr_fderiv (hasStrictFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange'.comp x
(hasStrictFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (l.get i) (List.getElem_mem ..)) :) ?_
ext m
simp_rw [List.map_take, List.map_drop, List.map_map, comp_apply, sum_apply, smul_apply,
smulRight_apply, proj_apply, pi_apply, Function.comp_def]
/--
Unlike `HasFDerivAt.finset_prod`, supports non-commutative multiply and duplicate elements.
-/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.list_prod' {l : List ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ l, HasFDerivAt (f i ·) (f' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ (l.map (f · x)).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map (f · x)).prod •
smulRight (f' l[i]) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map (f · x)).prod) x := by
simp_rw [Fin.getElem_fin, ← l.get_eq_getElem, ← List.finRange_map_get l, List.map_map]
refine .congr_fderiv (hasFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange'.comp x
(hasFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (l.get i) (l.get_mem i)) :) ?_
ext m
simp_rw [List.map_take, List.map_drop, List.map_map, comp_apply, sum_apply, smul_apply,
smulRight_apply, proj_apply, pi_apply, Function.comp_def]
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.list_prod' {l : List ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ l, HasFDerivWithinAt (f i ·) (f' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x ↦ (l.map (f · x)).prod)
(∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map (f · x)).prod •
smulRight (f' l[i]) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map (f · x)).prod) s x := by
simp_rw [Fin.getElem_fin, ← l.get_eq_getElem, ← List.finRange_map_get l, List.map_map]
refine .congr_fderiv (hasFDerivAt_list_prod_finRange'.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x
(hasFDerivWithinAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (l.get i) (l.get_mem i)) :) ?_
ext m
simp_rw [List.map_take, List.map_drop, List.map_map, comp_apply, sum_apply, smul_apply,
smulRight_apply, proj_apply, pi_apply, Function.comp_def]
theorem fderiv_list_prod' {l : List ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ l, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (f i ·) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (l.map (f · x)).prod) x =
∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map (f · x)).prod •
smulRight (fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f l[i] x) x) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map (f · x)).prod :=
(HasFDerivAt.list_prod' fun i hi ↦ (h i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
theorem fderivWithin_list_prod' {l : List ι} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (h : ∀ i ∈ l, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (f i ·) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (l.map (f · x)).prod) s x =
∑ i : Fin l.length, ((l.take i).map (f · x)).prod •
smulRight (fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ f l[i] x) s x) ((l.drop (.succ i)).map (f · x)).prod :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.list_prod' fun i hi ↦ (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictFDerivAt (g i ·) (g' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (fun x ↦ (u.map (g · x)).prod)
(u.map fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map (g · x)).prod • g' i).sum x := by
simp only [← Multiset.attach_map_val u, Multiset.map_map]
exact .congr_fderiv
(hasStrictFDerivAt_multiset_prod.comp x <|
hasStrictFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (Subtype.val i) i.prop :)
(by ext; simp [Finset.sum_multiset_map_count, u.erase_attach_map (g · x)])
/--
Unlike `HasFDerivAt.finset_prod`, supports duplicate elements.
-/
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivAt.multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAt (g i ·) (g' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (fun x ↦ (u.map (g · x)).prod)
(u.map fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map (g · x)).prod • g' i).sum x := by
simp only [← Multiset.attach_map_val u, Multiset.map_map]
exact .congr_fderiv
(hasFDerivAt_multiset_prod.comp x <| hasFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (Subtype.val i) i.prop :)
(by ext; simp [Finset.sum_multiset_map_count, u.erase_attach_map (g · x)])
@[fun_prop]
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt (g i ·) (g' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (fun x ↦ (u.map (g · x)).prod)
(u.map fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map (g · x)).prod • g' i).sum s x := by
simp only [← Multiset.attach_map_val u, Multiset.map_map]
exact .congr_fderiv
(hasFDerivAt_multiset_prod.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <|
hasFDerivWithinAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ h (Subtype.val i) i.prop :)
(by ext; simp [Finset.sum_multiset_map_count, u.erase_attach_map (g · x)])
theorem fderiv_multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : E}
(h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (g i ·) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (u.map (g · x)).prod) x =
(u.map fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map (g · x)).prod • fderiv 𝕜 (g i) x).sum :=
(HasFDerivAt.multiset_prod fun i hi ↦ (h i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
theorem fderivWithin_multiset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {u : Multiset ι} {x : E}
(hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) (h : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g i ·) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (u.map (g · x)).prod) s x =
(u.map fun i ↦ ((u.erase i).map (g · x)).prod • fderivWithin 𝕜 (g i) s x).sum :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.multiset_prod fun i hi ↦ (h i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
theorem HasStrictFDerivAt.finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {x : E}
(hg : ∀ i ∈ u, HasStrictFDerivAt (g i) (g' i) x) :
HasStrictFDerivAt (∏ i ∈ u, g i ·) (∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, g j x) • g' i) x := by
simpa [← Finset.prod_attach u] using .congr_fderiv
(hasStrictFDerivAt_finset_prod.comp x <| hasStrictFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ hg i i.prop)
(by ext; simp [Finset.prod_erase_attach (g · x), ← u.sum_attach])
theorem HasFDerivAt.finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {x : E}
(hg : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivAt (g i) (g' i) x) :
HasFDerivAt (∏ i ∈ u, g i ·) (∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, g j x) • g' i) x := by
simpa [← Finset.prod_attach u] using .congr_fderiv
(hasFDerivAt_finset_prod.comp x <| hasFDerivAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ hg (Subtype.val i) i.prop :)
(by ext; simp [Finset.prod_erase_attach (g · x), ← u.sum_attach])
theorem HasFDerivWithinAt.finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {x : E}
(hg : ∀ i ∈ u, HasFDerivWithinAt (g i) (g' i) s x) :
HasFDerivWithinAt (∏ i ∈ u, g i ·) (∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, g j x) • g' i) s x := by
simpa [← Finset.prod_attach u] using .congr_fderiv
(hasFDerivAt_finset_prod.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x <|
hasFDerivWithinAt_pi.mpr fun i ↦ hg (Subtype.val i) i.prop :)
(by ext; simp [Finset.prod_erase_attach (g · x), ← u.sum_attach])
theorem fderiv_finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {x : E} (hg : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (g i) x) :
fderiv 𝕜 (∏ i ∈ u, g i ·) x = ∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, (g j x)) • fderiv 𝕜 (g i) x :=
(HasFDerivAt.finset_prod fun i hi ↦ (hg i hi).hasFDerivAt).fderiv
theorem fderivWithin_finset_prod [DecidableEq ι] {x : E} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x)
(hg : ∀ i ∈ u, DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (g i) s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (∏ i ∈ u, g i ·) s x =
∑ i ∈ u, (∏ j ∈ u.erase i, (g j x)) • fderivWithin 𝕜 (g i) s x :=
(HasFDerivWithinAt.finset_prod fun i hi ↦ (hg i hi).hasFDerivWithinAt).fderivWithin hxs
end Comp
end Prod
section AlgebraInverse
variable {R : Type*} [NormedRing R] [HasSummableGeomSeries R] [NormedAlgebra 𝕜 R]
open NormedRing ContinuousLinearMap Ring
/-- At an invertible element `x` of a normed algebra `R`, the Fréchet derivative of the inversion
operation is the linear map `fun t ↦ - x⁻¹ * t * x⁻¹`.
TODO (low prio): prove a version without assumption `[HasSummableGeomSeries R]` but within the set
of units. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem hasFDerivAt_ringInverse (x : Rˣ) :
HasFDerivAt Ring.inverse (-mulLeftRight 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹ ↑x⁻¹) x :=
have : (fun t : R => Ring.inverse (↑x + t) - ↑x⁻¹ + ↑x⁻¹ * t * ↑x⁻¹) =o[𝓝 0] id :=
(inverse_add_norm_diff_second_order x).trans_isLittleO (isLittleO_norm_pow_id one_lt_two)
by simpa [hasFDerivAt_iff_isLittleO_nhds_zero] using this
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias hasFDerivAt_ring_inverse := hasFDerivAt_ringInverse
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableAt_inverse {x : R} (hx : IsUnit x) :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (@Ring.inverse R _) x :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hx; hu ▸ (hasFDerivAt_ringInverse u).differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableWithinAt_inverse {x : R} (hx : IsUnit x) (s : Set R) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (@Ring.inverse R _) s x :=
(differentiableAt_inverse hx).differentiableWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
theorem differentiableOn_inverse : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (@Ring.inverse R _) {x | IsUnit x} :=
fun _x hx => differentiableWithinAt_inverse hx _
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Mul.lean | 834 | 840 | theorem fderiv_inverse (x : Rˣ) : fderiv 𝕜 (@Ring.inverse R _) x = -mulLeftRight 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹ ↑x⁻¹ :=
(hasFDerivAt_ringInverse x).fderiv
theorem hasStrictFDerivAt_ringInverse (x : Rˣ) :
HasStrictFDerivAt Ring.inverse (-mulLeftRight 𝕜 R ↑x⁻¹ ↑x⁻¹) x := by | convert (analyticAt_inverse (𝕜 := 𝕜) x).hasStrictFDerivAt
exact (fderiv_inverse x).symm |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.InitTail
/-!
# Truncated Witt vectors
The ring of truncated Witt vectors (of length `n`) is a quotient of the ring of Witt vectors.
It retains the first `n` coefficients of each Witt vector.
In this file, we set up the basic quotient API for this ring.
The ring of Witt vectors is the projective limit of all the rings of truncated Witt vectors.
## Main declarations
- `TruncatedWittVector`: the underlying type of the ring of truncated Witt vectors
- `TruncatedWittVector.instCommRing`: the ring structure on truncated Witt vectors
- `WittVector.truncate`: the quotient homomorphism that truncates a Witt vector,
to obtain a truncated Witt vector
- `TruncatedWittVector.truncate`: the homomorphism that truncates
a truncated Witt vector of length `n` to one of length `m` (for some `m ≤ n`)
- `WittVector.lift`: the unique ring homomorphism into the ring of Witt vectors
that is compatible with a family of ring homomorphisms to the truncated Witt vectors:
this realizes the ring of Witt vectors as projective limit of the rings of truncated Witt vectors
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
open Function (Injective Surjective)
noncomputable section
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) (R : Type*)
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
/-- A truncated Witt vector over `R` is a vector of elements of `R`,
i.e., the first `n` coefficients of a Witt vector.
We will define operations on this type that are compatible with the (untruncated) Witt
vector operations.
`TruncatedWittVector p n R` takes a parameter `p : ℕ` that is not used in the definition.
In practice, this number `p` is assumed to be a prime number,
and under this assumption we construct a ring structure on `TruncatedWittVector p n R`.
(`TruncatedWittVector p₁ n R` and `TruncatedWittVector p₂ n R` are definitionally
equal as types but will have different ring operations.)
-/
@[nolint unusedArguments]
def TruncatedWittVector (_ : ℕ) (n : ℕ) (R : Type*) :=
Fin n → R
instance (p n : ℕ) (R : Type*) [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (TruncatedWittVector p n R) :=
⟨fun _ => default⟩
variable {n R}
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable (p) in
/-- Create a `TruncatedWittVector` from a vector `x`. -/
def mk (x : Fin n → R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
x
/-- `x.coeff i` is the `i`th entry of `x`. -/
def coeff (i : Fin n) (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : R :=
x i
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : TruncatedWittVector p n R} (h : ∀ i, x.coeff i = y.coeff i) : x = y :=
funext h
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mk (x : Fin n → R) (i : Fin n) : (mk p x).coeff i = x i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_coeff (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : (mk p fun i => x.coeff i) = x := by
ext i; rw [coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
/-- We can turn a truncated Witt vector `x` into a Witt vector
by setting all coefficients after `x` to be 0.
-/
def out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : 𝕎 R :=
@WittVector.mk' p _ fun i => if h : i < n then x.coeff ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
@[simp]
theorem coeff_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) (i : Fin n) : x.out.coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [out]; dsimp only; rw [dif_pos i.is_lt, Fin.eta]
theorem out_injective : Injective (@out p n R _) := by
intro x y h
ext i
rw [WittVector.ext_iff] at h
simpa only [coeff_out] using h ↑i
end TruncatedWittVector
namespace WittVector
variable (n)
section
/-- `truncateFun n x` uses the first `n` entries of `x` to construct a `TruncatedWittVector`,
which has the same base `p` as `x`.
This function is bundled into a ring homomorphism in `WittVector.truncate` -/
def truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : TruncatedWittVector p n R :=
TruncatedWittVector.mk p fun i => x.coeff i
end
variable {n}
@[simp]
theorem coeff_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) (i : Fin n) : (truncateFun n x).coeff i = x.coeff i := by
rw [truncateFun, TruncatedWittVector.coeff_mk]
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
theorem out_truncateFun (x : 𝕎 R) : (truncateFun n x).out = init n x := by
ext i
dsimp [TruncatedWittVector.out, init, select, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi; swap; · rfl
rw [coeff_truncateFun, Fin.val_mk]
end WittVector
namespace TruncatedWittVector
variable [CommRing R]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Truncated.lean | 145 | 146 | theorem truncateFun_out (x : TruncatedWittVector p n R) : x.out.truncateFun n = x := by | simp only [WittVector.truncateFun, coeff_out, mk_coeff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.IsomorphismClasses
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.ZeroObjects
/-!
# Zero morphisms and zero objects
A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. (Notice this is extra
structure, not merely a property.)
A category "has a zero object" if it has an object which is both initial and terminal. Having a
zero object provides zero morphisms, as the unique morphisms factoring through the zero object.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zero_morphism
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
universe w v v' u u'
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Category
namespace CategoryTheory.Limits
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
variable (D : Type u') [Category.{v'} D]
/-- A category "has zero morphisms" if there is a designated "zero morphism" in each morphism space,
and compositions of zero morphisms with anything give the zero morphism. -/
class HasZeroMorphisms where
/-- Every morphism space has zero -/
[zero : ∀ X Y : C, Zero (X ⟶ Y)]
/-- `f` composed with `0` is `0` -/
comp_zero : ∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C), f ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = (0 : X ⟶ Z) := by aesop_cat
/-- `0` composed with `f` is `0` -/
zero_comp : ∀ (X : C) {Y Z : C} (f : Y ⟶ Z), (0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ f = (0 : X ⟶ Z) := by aesop_cat
attribute [instance] HasZeroMorphisms.zero
variable {C}
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {Z : C} :
f ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Z) = (0 : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero f Z
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp [HasZeroMorphisms C] {X : C} {Y Z : C} {f : Y ⟶ Z} :
(0 : X ⟶ Y) ≫ f = (0 : X ⟶ Z) :=
HasZeroMorphisms.zero_comp X f
instance hasZeroMorphismsPEmpty : HasZeroMorphisms (Discrete PEmpty) where
zero := by aesop_cat
instance hasZeroMorphismsPUnit : HasZeroMorphisms (Discrete PUnit) where
zero X Y := by repeat (constructor)
namespace HasZeroMorphisms
/-- This lemma will be immediately superseded by `ext`, below. -/
private theorem ext_aux (I J : HasZeroMorphisms C)
(w : ∀ X Y : C, (I.zero X Y).zero = (J.zero X Y).zero) : I = J := by
have : I.zero = J.zero := by
funext X Y
specialize w X Y
apply congrArg Zero.mk w
cases I; cases J
congr
· apply proof_irrel_heq
· apply proof_irrel_heq
/-- If you're tempted to use this lemma "in the wild", you should probably
carefully consider whether you've made a mistake in allowing two
instances of `HasZeroMorphisms` to exist at all.
See, particularly, the note on `zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` below.
-/
theorem ext (I J : HasZeroMorphisms C) : I = J := by
apply ext_aux
intro X Y
have : (I.zero X Y).zero ≫ (J.zero Y Y).zero = (I.zero X Y).zero := by
apply I.zero_comp X (J.zero Y Y).zero
have that : (I.zero X Y).zero ≫ (J.zero Y Y).zero = (J.zero X Y).zero := by
apply J.comp_zero (I.zero X Y).zero Y
rw [← this, ← that]
instance : Subsingleton (HasZeroMorphisms C) :=
⟨ext⟩
end HasZeroMorphisms
open Opposite HasZeroMorphisms
instance hasZeroMorphismsOpposite [HasZeroMorphisms C] : HasZeroMorphisms Cᵒᵖ where
zero X Y := ⟨(0 : unop Y ⟶ unop X).op⟩
comp_zero f Z := congr_arg Quiver.Hom.op (HasZeroMorphisms.zero_comp (unop Z) f.unop)
zero_comp X {Y Z} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :=
congrArg Quiver.Hom.op (HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero f.unop (unop X))
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
@[simp] lemma op_zero (X Y : C) : (0 : X ⟶ Y).op = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma unop_zero (X Y : Cᵒᵖ) : (0 : X ⟶ Y).unop = 0 := rfl
theorem zero_of_comp_mono {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} (g : Y ⟶ Z) [Mono g] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : f = 0 := by
rw [← zero_comp, cancel_mono] at h
exact h
theorem zero_of_epi_comp {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) {g : Y ⟶ Z} [Epi f] (h : f ≫ g = 0) : g = 0 := by
rw [← comp_zero, cancel_epi] at h
exact h
theorem eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] (w : image.ι f = 0) :
f = 0 := by rw [← image.fac f, w, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
theorem nonzero_image_of_nonzero {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} [HasImage f] (w : f ≠ 0) : image.ι f ≠ 0 :=
fun h => w (eq_zero_of_image_eq_zero h)
end
section
variable [HasZeroMorphisms D]
instance : HasZeroMorphisms (C ⥤ D) where
zero F G := ⟨{ app := fun _ => 0 }⟩
comp_zero := fun η H => by
ext X; dsimp; apply comp_zero
zero_comp := fun F {G H} η => by
ext X; dsimp; apply zero_comp
@[simp]
theorem zero_app (F G : C ⥤ D) (j : C) : (0 : F ⟶ G).app j = 0 := rfl
end
namespace IsZero
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
theorem eq_zero_of_src {X Y : C} (o : IsZero X) (f : X ⟶ Y) : f = 0 :=
o.eq_of_src _ _
theorem eq_zero_of_tgt {X Y : C} (o : IsZero Y) (f : X ⟶ Y) : f = 0 :=
o.eq_of_tgt _ _
theorem iff_id_eq_zero (X : C) : IsZero X ↔ 𝟙 X = 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.eq_of_src _ _, fun h =>
⟨fun Y => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => by
rw [← id_comp f, ← id_comp (0 : X ⟶ Y), h, zero_comp, zero_comp]; simp only⟩⟩,
fun Y => ⟨⟨⟨0⟩, fun f => by
rw [← comp_id f, ← comp_id (0 : Y ⟶ X), h, comp_zero, comp_zero]; simp only ⟩⟩⟩⟩
theorem of_mono_zero (X Y : C) [Mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)] : IsZero X :=
(iff_id_eq_zero X).mpr ((cancel_mono (0 : X ⟶ Y)).1 (by simp))
theorem of_epi_zero (X Y : C) [Epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)] : IsZero Y :=
(iff_id_eq_zero Y).mpr ((cancel_epi (0 : X ⟶ Y)).1 (by simp))
theorem of_mono_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] (h : f = 0) : IsZero X := by
subst h
apply of_mono_zero X Y
theorem of_epi_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] (h : f = 0) : IsZero Y := by
subst h
apply of_epi_zero X Y
theorem iff_isSplitMono_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsSplitMono f] : IsZero X ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [iff_id_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Category.id_comp f, h, zero_comp]
· intro h
rw [← IsSplitMono.id f]
simp only [h, zero_comp]
theorem iff_isSplitEpi_eq_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsSplitEpi f] : IsZero Y ↔ f = 0 := by
rw [iff_id_eq_zero]
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Category.comp_id f, h, comp_zero]
· intro h
rw [← IsSplitEpi.id f]
simp [h]
theorem of_mono {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] (i : IsZero Y) : IsZero X := by
have hf := i.eq_zero_of_tgt f
subst hf
exact IsZero.of_mono_zero X Y
theorem of_epi {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Epi f] (i : IsZero X) : IsZero Y := by
have hf := i.eq_zero_of_src f
subst hf
exact IsZero.of_epi_zero X Y
end IsZero
/-- A category with a zero object has zero morphisms.
It is rarely a good idea to use this. Many categories that have a zero object have zero
morphisms for some other reason, for example from additivity. Library code that uses
`zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` will then be incompatible with these categories because
the `HasZeroMorphisms` instances will not be definitionally equal. For this reason library
code should generally ask for an instance of `HasZeroMorphisms` separately, even if it already
asks for an instance of `HasZeroObjects`. -/
def IsZero.hasZeroMorphisms {O : C} (hO : IsZero O) : HasZeroMorphisms C where
zero X Y := { zero := hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Y }
zero_comp X {Y Z} f := by
change (hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Y) ≫ f = hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Z
rw [Category.assoc]
congr
apply hO.eq_of_src
comp_zero {X Y} f Z := by
change f ≫ (hO.from_ Y ≫ hO.to_ Z) = hO.from_ X ≫ hO.to_ Z
rw [← Category.assoc]
congr
apply hO.eq_of_tgt
namespace HasZeroObject
variable [HasZeroObject C]
open ZeroObject
/-- A category with a zero object has zero morphisms.
It is rarely a good idea to use this. Many categories that have a zero object have zero
morphisms for some other reason, for example from additivity. Library code that uses
`zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject` will then be incompatible with these categories because
the `has_zero_morphisms` instances will not be definitionally equal. For this reason library
code should generally ask for an instance of `HasZeroMorphisms` separately, even if it already
asks for an instance of `HasZeroObjects`. -/
def zeroMorphismsOfZeroObject : HasZeroMorphisms C where
zero X _ := { zero := (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default }
zero_comp X {Y Z} f := by
change ((default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default) ≫ f = (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default
rw [Category.assoc]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
comp_zero {X Y} f Z := by
change f ≫ (default : Y ⟶ 0) ≫ default = (default : X ⟶ 0) ≫ default
rw [← Category.assoc]
congr
simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
section HasZeroMorphisms
variable [HasZeroMorphisms C]
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsInitial_hom {X : C} (t : IsInitial X) : (zeroIsoIsInitial t).hom = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsInitial_inv {X : C} (t : IsInitial X) : (zeroIsoIsInitial t).inv = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsTerminal_hom {X : C} (t : IsTerminal X) : (zeroIsoIsTerminal t).hom = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoIsTerminal_inv {X : C} (t : IsTerminal X) : (zeroIsoIsTerminal t).inv = 0 := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoInitial_hom [HasInitial C] : zeroIsoInitial.hom = (0 : 0 ⟶ ⊥_ C) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoInitial_inv [HasInitial C] : zeroIsoInitial.inv = (0 : ⊥_ C ⟶ 0) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoTerminal_hom [HasTerminal C] : zeroIsoTerminal.hom = (0 : 0 ⟶ ⊤_ C) := by ext
@[simp]
theorem zeroIsoTerminal_inv [HasTerminal C] : zeroIsoTerminal.inv = (0 : ⊤_ C ⟶ 0) := by ext
end HasZeroMorphisms
open ZeroObject
instance {B : Type*} [Category B] : HasZeroObject (B ⥤ C) :=
(((CategoryTheory.Functor.const B).obj (0 : C)).isZero fun _ => isZero_zero _).hasZeroObject
end HasZeroObject
open ZeroObject
variable {D}
@[simp]
theorem IsZero.map [HasZeroObject D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] {F : C ⥤ D} (hF : IsZero F) {X Y : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) : F.map f = 0 :=
(hF.obj _).eq_of_src _ _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CategoryTheory.Functor.zero_obj [HasZeroObject D] (X : C) :
IsZero ((0 : C ⥤ D).obj X) :=
(isZero_zero _).obj _
@[simp]
theorem _root_.CategoryTheory.zero_map [HasZeroObject D] [HasZeroMorphisms D] {X Y : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) : (0 : C ⥤ D).map f = 0 :=
(isZero_zero _).map _
section
variable [HasZeroObject C] [HasZeroMorphisms C]
open ZeroObject
@[simp]
theorem id_zero : 𝟙 (0 : C) = (0 : (0 : C) ⟶ 0) := by apply HasZeroObject.from_zero_ext
-- This can't be a `simp` lemma because the left hand side would be a metavariable.
/-- An arrow ending in the zero object is zero -/
theorem zero_of_to_zero {X : C} (f : X ⟶ 0) : f = 0 := by ext
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Limits/Shapes/ZeroMorphisms.lean | 332 | 332 | theorem zero_of_target_iso_zero {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (i : Y ≅ 0) : f = 0 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.Operations
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Outer measures from functions
Given an arbitrary function `m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞` that sends `∅` to `0` we can define an outer
measure on `α` that on `s` is defined to be the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (sᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`sᵢ` that cover `s`. This is the unique maximal outer measure that is at most the given function.
Given an outer measure `m`, the Carathéodory-measurable sets are the sets `s` such that
for all sets `t` we have `m t = m (t ∩ s) + m (t \ s)`. This forms a measurable space.
## Main definitions and statements
* `OuterMeasure.boundedBy` is the greatest outer measure that is at most the given function.
If you know that the given function sends `∅` to `0`, then `OuterMeasure.ofFunction` is a
special case.
* `sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen` is a characterization of the infimum of outer measures.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outer_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carath%C3%A9odory%27s_criterion>
## Tags
outer measure, Carathéodory-measurable, Carathéodory's criterion
-/
assert_not_exists Basis
noncomputable section
open Set Function Filter
open scoped NNReal Topology ENNReal
namespace MeasureTheory
namespace OuterMeasure
section OfFunction
variable {α : Type*}
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets satisfying `m ∅ = 0`, there is
a unique maximal outer measure `μ` satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. -/
protected def ofFunction (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) : OuterMeasure α :=
let μ s := ⨅ (f : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, f i), ∑' i, m (f i)
{ measureOf := μ
empty :=
le_antisymm
((iInf_le_of_le fun _ => ∅) <| iInf_le_of_le (empty_subset _) <| by simp [m_empty])
(zero_le _)
mono := fun {_ _} hs => iInf_mono fun _ => iInf_mono' fun hb => ⟨hs.trans hb, le_rfl⟩
iUnion_nat := fun s _ =>
ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add <| by
intro ε hε (hb : (∑' i, μ (s i)) < ∞)
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 hε).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', hε', hl⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hl) _)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_add]
choose f hf using
show ∀ i, ∃ f : ℕ → Set α, (s i ⊆ ⋃ i, f i) ∧ (∑' i, m (f i)) < μ (s i) + ε' i by
intro i
have : μ (s i) < μ (s i) + ε' i :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right (ne_top_of_le_ne_top hb.ne <| ENNReal.le_tsum _)
(by simpa using (hε' i).ne')
rcases iInf_lt_iff.mp this with ⟨t, ht⟩
exists t
contrapose! ht
exact le_iInf ht
refine le_trans ?_ (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => le_of_lt (hf i).2)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_prod, ← Nat.pairEquiv.symm.tsum_eq]
refine iInf_le_of_le _ (iInf_le _ ?_)
apply iUnion_subset
intro i
apply Subset.trans (hf i).1
apply iUnion_subset
simp only [Nat.pairEquiv_symm_apply]
rw [iUnion_unpair]
intro j
apply subset_iUnion₂ i }
variable (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0)
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`. -/
theorem ofFunction_apply (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t), ∑' n, m (t n) :=
rfl
/-- `ofFunction` of a set `s` is the infimum of `∑ᵢ, m (tᵢ)` for all collections of sets
`tᵢ` that cover `s`, with all `tᵢ` satisfying a predicate `P` such that `m` is infinite for sets
that don't satisfy `P`.
This is similar to `ofFunction_apply`, except that the sets `tᵢ` satisfy `P`.
The hypothesis `m_top` applies in particular to a function of the form `extend m'`. -/
theorem ofFunction_eq_iInf_mem {P : Set α → Prop} (m_top : ∀ s, ¬ P s → m s = ∞) (s : Set α) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s =
⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : ∀ i, P (t i)) (_ : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i), ∑' i, m (t i) := by
rw [OuterMeasure.ofFunction_apply]
apply le_antisymm
· exact le_iInf fun t ↦ le_iInf fun _ ↦ le_iInf fun h ↦ iInf₂_le _ (by exact h)
· simp_rw [le_iInf_iff]
refine fun t ht_subset ↦ iInf_le_of_le t ?_
by_cases ht : ∀ i, P (t i)
· exact iInf_le_of_le ht (iInf_le_of_le ht_subset le_rfl)
· simp only [ht, not_false_eq_true, iInf_neg, top_le_iff]
push_neg at ht
obtain ⟨i, hti_not_mem⟩ := ht
have hfi_top : m (t i) = ∞ := m_top _ hti_not_mem
exact ENNReal.tsum_eq_top_of_eq_top ⟨i, hfi_top⟩
variable {m m_empty}
theorem ofFunction_le (s : Set α) : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s ≤ m s :=
let f : ℕ → Set α := fun i => Nat.casesOn i s fun _ => ∅
iInf_le_of_le f <|
iInf_le_of_le (subset_iUnion f 0) <|
le_of_eq <| tsum_eq_single 0 <| by
rintro (_ | i)
· simp
· simp [f, m_empty]
theorem ofFunction_eq (s : Set α) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : Set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α, m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, m (s i)) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s = m s :=
le_antisymm (ofFunction_le s) <|
le_iInf fun f => le_iInf fun hf => le_trans (m_mono hf) (m_subadd f)
theorem le_ofFunction {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s :=
⟨fun H s => le_trans (H s) (ofFunction_le s), fun H _ =>
le_iInf fun f =>
le_iInf fun hs =>
le_trans (μ.mono hs) <| le_trans (measure_iUnion_le f) <| ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => H _⟩
theorem isGreatest_ofFunction :
IsGreatest { μ : OuterMeasure α | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) :=
⟨fun _ => ofFunction_le _, fun _ => le_ofFunction.2⟩
theorem ofFunction_eq_sSup : OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty = sSup { μ | ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s } :=
(@isGreatest_ofFunction α m m_empty).isLUB.sSup_eq.symm
/-- If `m u = ∞` for any set `u` that has nonempty intersection both with `s` and `t`, then
`μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t`, where `μ = MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty`.
E.g., if `α` is an (e)metric space and `m u = ∞` on any set of diameter `≥ r`, then this lemma
implies that `μ (s ∪ t) = μ s + μ t` on any two sets such that `r ≤ edist x y` for all `x ∈ s`
and `y ∈ t`. -/
theorem ofFunction_union_of_top_of_nonempty_inter {s t : Set α}
(h : ∀ u, (s ∩ u).Nonempty → (t ∩ u).Nonempty → m u = ∞) :
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty (s ∪ t) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s + OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_union_le _ _) (le_iInf₂ fun f hf ↦ ?_)
set μ := OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, (s ∩ f i).Nonempty ∧ (t ∩ f i).Nonempty) with (⟨i, hs, ht⟩ | he)
· calc
μ s + μ t ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ = m (f i) := (h (f i) hs ht).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.le_tsum i
set I := fun s => { i : ℕ | (s ∩ f i).Nonempty }
have hd : Disjoint (I s) (I t) := disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr fun i hi => he ⟨i, hi⟩
have hI : ∀ u ⊆ s ∪ t, μ u ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := fun u hu =>
calc
μ u ≤ μ (⋃ i : I u, f i) :=
μ.mono fun x hx =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hf (hu hx))
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨i, ⟨x, hx, hi⟩⟩, hi⟩
_ ≤ ∑' i : I u, μ (f i) := measure_iUnion_le _
calc
μ s + μ t ≤ (∑' i : I s, μ (f i)) + ∑' i : I t, μ (f i) :=
add_le_add (hI _ subset_union_left) (hI _ subset_union_right)
_ = ∑' i : ↑(I s ∪ I t), μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun i => μ (f i)) hd ENNReal.summable).symm
_ ≤ ∑' i, μ (f i) :=
(ENNReal.summable.tsum_le_tsum_of_inj (↑) Subtype.coe_injective (fun _ _ => zero_le _)
(fun _ => le_rfl) ENNReal.summable)
_ ≤ ∑' i, m (f i) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => ofFunction_le _
theorem comap_ofFunction {β} (f : β → α) (h : Monotone m ∨ Surjective f) :
comap f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f '' s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_ofFunction.2 fun s => ?_) fun s => ?_
· rw [comap_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
· rw [comap_apply, ofFunction_apply, ofFunction_apply]
refine iInf_mono' fun t => ⟨fun k => f ⁻¹' t k, ?_⟩
refine iInf_mono' fun ht => ?_
rw [Set.image_subset_iff, preimage_iUnion] at ht
refine ⟨ht, ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => ?_⟩
rcases h with hl | hr
exacts [hl (image_preimage_subset _ _), (congr_arg m (hr.image_preimage (t n))).le]
theorem map_ofFunction_le {β} (f : α → β) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) ≤
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty :=
le_ofFunction.2 fun s => by
rw [map_apply]
apply ofFunction_le
theorem map_ofFunction {β} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
map f (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => m (f ⁻¹' s)) m_empty := by
refine (map_ofFunction_le _).antisymm fun s => ?_
simp only [ofFunction_apply, map_apply, le_iInf_iff]
intro t ht
refine iInf_le_of_le (fun n => (range f)ᶜ ∪ f '' t n) (iInf_le_of_le ?_ ?_)
· rw [← union_iUnion, ← inter_subset, ← image_preimage_eq_inter_range, ← image_iUnion]
exact image_subset _ ht
· refine ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun n => le_of_eq ?_
simp [hf.preimage_image]
-- TODO (kmill): change `m (t ∩ s)` to `m (s ∩ t)`
theorem restrict_ofFunction (s : Set α) (hm : Monotone m) :
restrict s (OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty) =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun t => m (t ∩ s)) (by simp; simp [m_empty]) := by
rw [restrict]
simp only [inter_comm _ s, LinearMap.comp_apply]
rw [comap_ofFunction _ (Or.inl hm)]
simp only [map_ofFunction Subtype.coe_injective, Subtype.image_preimage_coe]
theorem smul_ofFunction {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : c • OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty =
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (c • m) (by simp [m_empty]) := by
ext1 s
haveI : Nonempty { t : ℕ → Set α // s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i } := ⟨⟨fun _ => s, subset_iUnion (fun _ => s) 0⟩⟩
simp only [smul_apply, ofFunction_apply, ENNReal.tsum_mul_left, Pi.smul_apply, smul_eq_mul,
iInf_subtype']
rw [ENNReal.mul_iInf fun h => (hc h).elim]
end OfFunction
section BoundedBy
variable {α : Type*} (m : Set α → ℝ≥0∞)
/-- Given any function `m` assigning measures to sets, there is a unique maximal outer measure `μ`
satisfying `μ s ≤ m s` for all `s : Set α`. This is the same as `OuterMeasure.ofFunction`,
except that it doesn't require `m ∅ = 0`. -/
def boundedBy : OuterMeasure α :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction (fun s => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) (by simp [Set.not_nonempty_empty])
variable {m}
theorem boundedBy_le (s : Set α) : boundedBy m s ≤ m s :=
(ofFunction_le _).trans iSup_const_le
theorem boundedBy_eq_ofFunction (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (s : Set α) :
boundedBy m s = OuterMeasure.ofFunction m m_empty s := by
have : (fun s : Set α => ⨆ _ : s.Nonempty, m s) = m := by
ext1 t
rcases t.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h <;> simp [h, Set.not_nonempty_empty, m_empty]
simp [boundedBy, this]
theorem boundedBy_apply (s : Set α) :
boundedBy m s = ⨅ (t : ℕ → Set α) (_ : s ⊆ iUnion t),
∑' n, ⨆ _ : (t n).Nonempty, m (t n) := by
simp [boundedBy, ofFunction_apply]
theorem boundedBy_eq (s : Set α) (m_empty : m ∅ = 0) (m_mono : ∀ ⦃t : Set α⦄, s ⊆ t → m s ≤ m t)
(m_subadd : ∀ s : ℕ → Set α, m (⋃ i, s i) ≤ ∑' i, m (s i)) : boundedBy m s = m s := by
rw [boundedBy_eq_ofFunction m_empty, ofFunction_eq s m_mono m_subadd]
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_eq_self (m : OuterMeasure α) : boundedBy m = m :=
ext fun _ => boundedBy_eq _ measure_empty (fun _ ht => measure_mono ht) measure_iUnion_le
theorem le_boundedBy {μ : OuterMeasure α} : μ ≤ boundedBy m ↔ ∀ s, μ s ≤ m s := by
rw [boundedBy , le_ofFunction, forall_congr']; intro s
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h <;> simp [h, Set.not_nonempty_empty]
theorem le_boundedBy' {μ : OuterMeasure α} :
μ ≤ boundedBy m ↔ ∀ s : Set α, s.Nonempty → μ s ≤ m s := by
rw [le_boundedBy, forall_congr']
intro s
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with h | h <;> simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_top : boundedBy (⊤ : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) = ⊤ := by
rw [eq_top_iff, le_boundedBy']
intro s hs
rw [top_apply hs]
exact le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_zero : boundedBy (0 : Set α → ℝ≥0∞) = 0 := by
rw [← coe_bot, eq_bot_iff]
apply boundedBy_le
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/OfFunction.lean | 296 | 299 | theorem smul_boundedBy {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ ∞) : c • boundedBy m = boundedBy (c • m) := by | simp only [boundedBy , smul_ofFunction hc]
congr 1 with s : 1
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with (rfl | hs) <;> simp [*] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SimpleFuncDense
/-!
# Strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable functions
A function `f` is said to be strongly measurable if `f` is the sequential limit of simple functions.
It is said to be finitely strongly measurable with respect to a measure `μ` if the supports
of those simple functions have finite measure.
If the target space has a second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are
equivalent.
If the measure is sigma-finite, strongly measurable and finitely strongly measurable are equivalent.
The main property of finitely strongly measurable functions is
`FinStronglyMeasurable.exists_set_sigmaFinite`: there exists a measurable set `t` such that the
function is supported on `t` and `μ.restrict t` is sigma-finite. As a consequence, we can prove some
results for those functions as if the measure was sigma-finite.
We provide a solid API for strongly measurable functions, as a basis for the Bochner integral.
## Main definitions
* `StronglyMeasurable f`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`.
* `FinStronglyMeasurable f μ`: `f : α → β` is the limit of a sequence `fs : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β`
such that for all `n ∈ ℕ`, the measure of the support of `fs n` is finite.
## References
* [Hytönen, Tuomas, Jan Van Neerven, Mark Veraar, and Lutz Weis. Analysis in Banach spaces.
Springer, 2016.][Hytonen_VanNeerven_Veraar_Wies_2016]
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists InnerProductSpace
open MeasureTheory Filter TopologicalSpace Function Set MeasureTheory.Measure
open ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory NNReal
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [Countable ι]
namespace MeasureTheory
local infixr:25 " →ₛ " => SimpleFunc
section Definitions
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A function is `StronglyMeasurable` if it is the limit of simple functions. -/
def StronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
/-- The notation for StronglyMeasurable giving the measurable space instance explicitly. -/
scoped notation "StronglyMeasurable[" m "]" => @MeasureTheory.StronglyMeasurable _ _ _ m
/-- A function is `FinStronglyMeasurable` with respect to a measure if it is the limit of simple
functions with support with finite measure. -/
def FinStronglyMeasurable [Zero β]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : α → β) (μ : Measure α := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∃ fs : ℕ → α →ₛ β, (∀ n, μ (support (fs n)) < ∞) ∧ ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))
end Definitions
open MeasureTheory
/-! ## Strongly measurable functions -/
section StronglyMeasurable
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : α → β} {g : ℕ → α} {m : ℕ}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
theorem SimpleFunc.stronglyMeasurable (f : α →ₛ β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom [Subsingleton α] : StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.ofFinite f, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[simp, nontriviality]
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod [Subsingleton β] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
let f_sf : α →ₛ β := ⟨f, fun x => ?_, Set.Subsingleton.finite Set.subsingleton_of_subsingleton⟩
· exact ⟨fun _ => f_sf, fun x => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
· simp [Set.preimage, eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_cod (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable [Subsingleton β] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_cod
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_subsingleton_dom (since := "2025-04-09")]
lemma Subsingleton.stronglyMeasurable' [Subsingleton α] (f : α → β) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
.of_subsingleton_dom
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const {b : β} : StronglyMeasurable fun _ : α => b :=
⟨fun _ => SimpleFunc.const α b, fun _ => tendsto_const_nhds⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem stronglyMeasurable_one [One β] : StronglyMeasurable (1 : α → β) := stronglyMeasurable_const
/-- A version of `stronglyMeasurable_const` that assumes `f x = f y` for all `x, y`.
This version works for functions between empty types. -/
theorem stronglyMeasurable_const' (hf : ∀ x y, f x = f y) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
inhabit α
convert stronglyMeasurable_const (β := β) using 1
exact funext fun x => hf x default
variable [MeasurableSingletonClass α]
section aux
omit [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- Auxiliary definition for `StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete`. -/
private noncomputable def simpleFuncAux (f : α → β) (g : ℕ → α) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β
| 0 => .const _ (f (g 0))
| n + 1 => .piecewise {g n} (.singleton _) (.const _ <| f (g n)) (simpleFuncAux f g n)
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt : ∀ n > m, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m)
| _, .refl => by simp [simpleFuncAux]
| _, Nat.le.step (m := n) hmn => by
obtain hnm | hnm := eq_or_ne (g n) (g m) <;>
simp [simpleFuncAux, Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem , hnm.symm, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt _ hmn]
private lemma simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq : ∀ᶠ n in atTop, simpleFuncAux f g n (g m) = f (g m) :=
eventually_atTop.2 ⟨_, simpleFuncAux_eq_of_lt⟩
end aux
lemma StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete [Countable α] : StronglyMeasurable f := by
nontriviality α
nontriviality β
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ := exists_surjective_nat α
exact ⟨simpleFuncAux f g, hg.forall.2 fun m ↦
tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_eq simpleFuncAux_eventuallyEq⟩
@[deprecated StronglyMeasurable.of_discrete (since := "2025-04-09")]
theorem StronglyMeasurable.of_finite [Finite α] : StronglyMeasurable f := .of_discrete
end StronglyMeasurable
namespace StronglyMeasurable
variable {f g : α → β}
section BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
/-- A sequence of simple functions such that
`∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`.
That property is given by `stronglyMeasurable.tendsto_approx`. -/
protected noncomputable def approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
ℕ → α →ₛ β :=
hf.choose
protected theorem tendsto_approx {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approx n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) :=
hf.choose_spec
/-- Similar to `stronglyMeasurable.approx`, but enforces that the norm of every function in the
sequence is less than `c` everywhere. If `‖f x‖ ≤ c` this sequence of simple functions verifies
`Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x))`. -/
noncomputable def approxBounded {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [Norm β] [SMul ℝ β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : ℝ) : ℕ → SimpleFunc α β := fun n =>
(hf.approx n).map fun x => min 1 (c / ‖x‖) • x
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ} {x : α} (hfx : ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have h_tendsto := hf.tendsto_approx x
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
by_cases hfx0 : ‖f x‖ = 0
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hfx0
rw [hfx0] at h_tendsto ⊢
have h_tendsto_norm : Tendsto (fun n => ‖hf.approx n x‖) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
convert h_tendsto.norm
rw [norm_zero]
refine squeeze_zero_norm (fun n => ?_) h_tendsto_norm
calc
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖) • hf.approx n x‖ =
‖min 1 (c / ‖hf.approx n x‖)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ :=
norm_smul _ _
_ ≤ ‖(1 : ℝ)‖ * ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ (norm_nonneg _)
rw [norm_one, Real.norm_of_nonneg]
· exact min_le_left _ _
· exact le_min zero_le_one (div_nonneg ((norm_nonneg _).trans hfx) (norm_nonneg _))
_ = ‖hf.approx n x‖ := by rw [norm_one, one_mul]
rw [← one_smul ℝ (f x)]
refine Tendsto.smul ?_ h_tendsto
have : min 1 (c / ‖f x‖) = 1 := by
rw [min_eq_left_iff, one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm hfx0))]
exact hfx
nth_rw 2 [this.symm]
refine Tendsto.min tendsto_const_nhds ?_
exact Tendsto.div tendsto_const_nhds h_tendsto.norm hfx0
theorem tendsto_approxBounded_ae {β} {f : α → β} [NormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) {c : ℝ}
(hf_bound : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ‖f x‖ ≤ c) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => hf.approxBounded c n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := by
filter_upwards [hf_bound] with x hfx using tendsto_approxBounded_of_norm_le hf hfx
theorem norm_approxBounded_le {β} {f : α → β} [SeminormedAddCommGroup β] [NormedSpace ℝ β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {c : ℝ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable[m] f) (hc : 0 ≤ c) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
‖hf.approxBounded c n x‖ ≤ c := by
simp only [StronglyMeasurable.approxBounded, SimpleFunc.coe_map, Function.comp_apply]
refine (norm_smul_le _ _).trans ?_
by_cases h0 : ‖hf.approx n x‖ = 0
· simp only [h0, _root_.div_zero, min_eq_right, zero_le_one, norm_zero, mul_zero]
exact hc
rcases le_total ‖hf.approx n x‖ c with h | h
· rw [min_eq_left _]
· simpa only [norm_one, one_mul] using h
· rwa [one_le_div (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
· rw [min_eq_right _]
· rw [norm_div, norm_norm, mul_comm, mul_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm, ← mul_assoc,
inv_mul_cancel₀ h0, one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg hc]
· rwa [div_le_one (lt_of_le_of_ne (norm_nonneg _) (Ne.symm h0))]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_bot_iff [Nonempty β] [T2Space β] :
StronglyMeasurable[⊥] f ↔ ∃ c, f = fun _ => c := by
rcases isEmpty_or_nonempty α with hα | hα
· simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
refine ⟨fun hf => ?_, fun hf_eq => ?_⟩
· refine ⟨f hα.some, ?_⟩
let fs := hf.approx
have h_fs_tendsto : ∀ x, Tendsto (fun n => fs n x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf.tendsto_approx
have : ∀ n, ∃ c, ∀ x, fs n x = c := fun n => SimpleFunc.simpleFunc_bot (fs n)
let cs n := (this n).choose
have h_cs_eq : ∀ n, ⇑(fs n) = fun _ => cs n := fun n => funext (this n).choose_spec
conv at h_fs_tendsto => enter [x, 1, n]; rw [h_cs_eq]
have h_tendsto : Tendsto cs atTop (𝓝 (f hα.some)) := h_fs_tendsto hα.some
ext1 x
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (h_fs_tendsto x) h_tendsto
· obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := hf_eq
exact stronglyMeasurable_const
end BasicPropertiesInAnyTopologicalSpace
theorem finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β]
{m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} (hf_meas : StronglyMeasurable f) {t : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (hft_zero : ∀ x ∈ tᶜ, f x = 0) (htμ : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t)) :
FinStronglyMeasurable f μ := by
haveI : SigmaFinite (μ.restrict t) := htμ
let S := spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
have hS_meas : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (S n) := measurableSet_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)
let f_approx := hf_meas.approx
let fs n := SimpleFunc.restrict (f_approx n) (S n ∩ t)
have h_fs_t_compl : ∀ n, ∀ x, x ∉ t → fs n x = 0 := by
intro n x hxt
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
refine Set.indicator_of_not_mem ?_ _
simp [hxt]
refine ⟨fs, ?_, fun x => ?_⟩
· simp_rw [SimpleFunc.support_eq, ← Finset.mem_coe]
classical
refine fun n => measure_biUnion_lt_top {y ∈ (fs n).range | y ≠ 0}.finite_toSet fun y hy => ?_
rw [SimpleFunc.restrict_preimage_singleton _ ((hS_meas n).inter ht)]
swap
· letI : (y : β) → Decidable (y = 0) := fun y => Classical.propDecidable _
rw [Finset.mem_coe, Finset.mem_filter] at hy
exact hy.2
refine (measure_mono Set.inter_subset_left).trans_lt ?_
have h_lt_top := measure_spanningSets_lt_top (μ.restrict t) n
rwa [Measure.restrict_apply' ht] at h_lt_top
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
swap
· rw [funext fun n => h_fs_t_compl n x hxt, hft_zero x hxt]
exact tendsto_const_nhds
have h : Tendsto (fun n => (f_approx n) x) atTop (𝓝 (f x)) := hf_meas.tendsto_approx x
obtain ⟨n₁, hn₁⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → fs m x = f_approx m x := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m ∩ t := by
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, ∀ m, n ≤ m → x ∈ S m
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => Set.mem_inter (hn m hnm) hxt⟩
rsuffices ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ S n
· exact ⟨n, fun m hnm => monotone_spanningSets (μ.restrict t) hnm hn⟩
rw [← Set.mem_iUnion, iUnion_spanningSets (μ.restrict t)]
trivial
refine ⟨n, fun m hnm => ?_⟩
simp_rw [fs, SimpleFunc.restrict_apply _ ((hS_meas m).inter ht),
Set.indicator_of_mem (hn m hnm)]
rw [tendsto_atTop'] at h ⊢
intro s hs
obtain ⟨n₂, hn₂⟩ := h s hs
refine ⟨max n₁ n₂, fun m hm => ?_⟩
rw [hn₁ m ((le_max_left _ _).trans hm.le)]
exact hn₂ m ((le_max_right _ _).trans hm.le)
/-- If the measure is sigma-finite, all strongly measurable functions are
`FinStronglyMeasurable`. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem finStronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [Zero β] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (μ : Measure α) [SigmaFinite μ] : FinStronglyMeasurable f μ :=
hf.finStronglyMeasurable_of_set_sigmaFinite MeasurableSet.univ (by simp)
(by rwa [Measure.restrict_univ])
/-- A strongly measurable function is measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem measurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : Measurable f :=
measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n => (hf.approx n).measurable)
(tendsto_pi_nhds.mpr hf.tendsto_approx)
/-- A strongly measurable function is almost everywhere measurable. -/
@[aesop 5% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem aemeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] {μ : Measure α}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
hf.measurable.aemeasurable
theorem _root_.Continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β} (hg : Continuous g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.map g (hf.approx n), fun x => (hg.tendsto _).comp (hf.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
nonrec theorem measurableSet_mulSupport {m : MeasurableSpace α} [One β] [TopologicalSpace β]
[MetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : MeasurableSet (mulSupport f) := by
borelize β
exact measurableSet_mulSupport hf.measurable
protected theorem mono {m m' : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable[m'] f) (h_mono : m' ≤ m) : StronglyMeasurable[m] f := by
let f_approx : ℕ → @SimpleFunc α m β := fun n =>
@SimpleFunc.mk α m β
(hf.approx n)
(fun x => h_mono _ (SimpleFunc.measurableSet_fiber' _ x))
(SimpleFunc.finite_range (hf.approx n))
exact ⟨f_approx, hf.tendsto_approx⟩
protected theorem prodMk {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → β} {g : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (f x, g x) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.pair (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact Tendsto.prodMk (hf.tendsto_approx x) (hg.tendsto_approx x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-05")] protected alias prod_mk := StronglyMeasurable.prodMk
theorem comp_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → β} {g : γ → α} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : Measurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ∘ g) :=
⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.comp (hf.approx n) g hg, fun x => hf.tendsto_approx (g x)⟩
theorem of_uncurry_left [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {x : α} : StronglyMeasurable (f x) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_left
theorem of_uncurry_right [TopologicalSpace β] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ}
{f : α → γ → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable (uncurry f)) {y : γ} :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x y :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_prodMk_right
protected theorem prod_swap {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β × α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.swap) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_swap
protected theorem fst {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [mβ : MeasurableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : α → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.1) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_fst
protected theorem snd [mα : MeasurableSpace α] {_ : MeasurableSpace β} [TopologicalSpace γ]
{f : β → γ} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (fun z : α × β => f z.2) :=
hf.comp_measurable measurable_snd
section Arithmetic
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f * g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n * hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).mul (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem mul_const [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x * c :=
hf.mul stronglyMeasurable_const
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem const_mul [Mul β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => c * f x :=
stronglyMeasurable_const.mul hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])) const_nsmul]
protected theorem pow [Monoid β] [ContinuousMul β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (n : ℕ) :
StronglyMeasurable (f ^ n) :=
⟨fun k => hf.approx k ^ n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).pow n⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem inv [Inv β] [ContinuousInv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f⁻¹ :=
⟨fun n => (hf.approx n)⁻¹, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).inv⟩
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem div [Div β] [ContinuousDiv β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f / g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n / hg.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).div' (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_right [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (f * g) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
⟨fun h ↦ show g = f * g * f⁻¹ by simp only [mul_inv_cancel_comm] ▸ h.mul hf.inv,
fun h ↦ hf.mul h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_iff_left [CommGroup β] [IsTopologicalGroup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable (g * f) ↔ StronglyMeasurable g :=
mul_comm g f ▸ mul_iff_right hf
@[to_additive (attr := aesop safe 20 apply (rule_sets := [Measurable]))]
protected theorem smul {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
{g : α → β} (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • g x :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk hg)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable (c • f) :=
⟨fun n => c • hf.approx n, fun x => (hf.tendsto_approx x).const_smul c⟩
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem const_smul' {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousConstSMul 𝕜 β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(c : 𝕜) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x :=
hf.const_smul c
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
protected theorem smul_const {𝕜} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [SMul 𝕜 β] [ContinuousSMul 𝕜 β] {f : α → 𝕜}
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (c : β) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => f x • c :=
continuous_smul.comp_stronglyMeasurable (hf.prodMk stronglyMeasurable_const)
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.add_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g + f) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ g x + φ n x) atTop (𝓝 (g + f)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ tendsto_const_nhds.add (hφ x))
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.add_simpleFunc _
/-- In a normed vector space, the subtraction of a measurable function and a strongly measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the subtraction of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.sub_stronglyMeasurable
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddGroup E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [ContinuousNeg E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (g - f) := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hg.add_stronglyMeasurable hf.neg
/-- In a normed vector space, the addition of a strongly measurable function and a measurable
function is measurable. Note that this is not true without further second-countability assumptions
for the addition of two measurable functions. -/
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable_add
{α E : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [AddCancelMonoid E] [TopologicalSpace E]
[MeasurableSpace E] [BorelSpace E] [ContinuousAdd E] [PseudoMetrizableSpace E]
{g f : α → E} (hg : Measurable g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) :
Measurable (f + g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
have : Tendsto (fun n x ↦ φ n x + g x) atTop (𝓝 (f + g)) :=
tendsto_pi_nhds.2 (fun x ↦ (hφ x).add tendsto_const_nhds)
apply measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable (fun n ↦ ?_) this
exact hg.simpleFunc_add _
end Arithmetic
section MulAction
variable {M G G₀ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace β]
variable [Monoid M] [MulAction M β] [ContinuousConstSMul M β]
variable [Group G] [MulAction G β] [ContinuousConstSMul G β]
variable [GroupWithZero G₀] [MulAction G₀ β] [ContinuousConstSMul G₀ β]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : G) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
⟨fun h => by simpa only [inv_smul_smul] using h.const_smul' c⁻¹, fun h => h.const_smul c⟩
nonrec theorem _root_.IsUnit.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : M}
(hc : IsUnit c) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hc
hu ▸ stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff u
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff₀ {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {c : G₀} (hc : c ≠ 0) :
(StronglyMeasurable fun x => c • f x) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f :=
(IsUnit.mk0 _ hc).stronglyMeasurable_const_smul_iff
end MulAction
section Order
variable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β]
open Filter
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem sup [Max β] [ContinuousSup β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊔ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊔ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).sup_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
@[aesop safe 20 (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
protected theorem inf [Min β] [ContinuousInf β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (f ⊓ g) :=
⟨fun n => hf.approx n ⊓ hg.approx n, fun x =>
(hf.tendsto_approx x).inf_nhds (hg.tendsto_approx x)⟩
end Order
/-!
### Big operators: `∏` and `∑`
-/
section Monoid
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
induction' l with f l ihl; · exact stronglyMeasurable_one
rw [List.forall_mem_cons] at hl
rw [List.prod_cons]
exact hl.1.mul (ihl hl.2)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.List.stronglyMeasurable_prod (l : List (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (l.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.list_prod_apply] using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hl
end Monoid
section CommMonoid
variable {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [TopologicalSpace M] [ContinuousMul M] {m : MeasurableSpace α}
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (l : Multiset (α → M))
(hl : ∀ f ∈ l, StronglyMeasurable f) : StronglyMeasurable l.prod := by
rcases l with ⟨l⟩
simpa using l.stronglyMeasurable_prod' (by simpa using hl)
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Multiset.stronglyMeasurable_prod (s : Multiset (α → M))
(hs : ∀ f ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable fun x => (s.map fun f : α → M => f x).prod := by
simpa only [← Pi.multiset_prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hs
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod' {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable (∏ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Finset.prod_induction _ _ (fun _a _b ha hb => ha.mul hb) (@stronglyMeasurable_one α M _ _ _) hf
@[to_additive (attr := measurability)]
theorem _root_.Finset.stronglyMeasurable_prod {ι : Type*} {f : ι → α → M} (s : Finset ι)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) : StronglyMeasurable fun a => ∏ i ∈ s, f i a := by
simpa only [← Finset.prod_apply] using s.stronglyMeasurable_prod' hf
end CommMonoid
/-- The range of a strongly measurable function is separable. -/
protected theorem isSeparable_range {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hf : StronglyMeasurable f) : TopologicalSpace.IsSeparable (range f) := by
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ n, range (hf.approx n))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun n => (hf.approx n).finite_range.isSeparable
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto (hf.tendsto_approx x)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
theorem separableSpace_range_union_singleton {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) {b : β} :
SeparableSpace (range f ∪ {b} : Set β) :=
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
(hf.isSeparable_range.union (finite_singleton _).isSeparable).separableSpace
section SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
variable {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- In a space with second countable topology, measurable implies strongly measurable. -/
@[aesop 90% apply (rule_sets := [Measurable])]
theorem _root_.Measurable.stronglyMeasurable [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[SecondCountableTopology β] [OpensMeasurableSpace β] (hf : Measurable f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
nontriviality β; inhabit β
exact ⟨SimpleFunc.approxOn f hf Set.univ default (Set.mem_univ _), fun x ↦
SimpleFunc.tendsto_approxOn hf (Set.mem_univ _) (by rw [closure_univ]; simp)⟩
/-- In a space with second countable topology, strongly measurable and measurable are equivalent. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable [TopologicalSpace β] [MetrizableSpace β]
[BorelSpace β] [SecondCountableTopology β] : StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f :=
⟨fun h => h.measurable, fun h => Measurable.stronglyMeasurable h⟩
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_id [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [SecondCountableTopology α] : StronglyMeasurable (id : α → α) :=
measurable_id.stronglyMeasurable
end SecondCountableStronglyMeasurable
/-- A function is strongly measurable if and only if it is measurable and has separable
range. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] :
StronglyMeasurable f ↔ Measurable f ∧ IsSeparable (range f) := by
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ⟨H.measurable, H.isSeparable_range⟩, fun ⟨Hm, Hsep⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
have := Hsep.secondCountableTopology
have Hm' : StronglyMeasurable (rangeFactorization f) := Hm.subtype_mk.stronglyMeasurable
exact continuous_subtype_val.comp_stronglyMeasurable Hm'
/-- A continuous function is strongly measurable when either the source space or the target space
is second-countable. -/
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable [MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α]
[OpensMeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β]
[h : SecondCountableTopologyEither α β] {f : α → β} (hf : Continuous f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize β
cases h.out
· rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
refine ⟨hf.measurable, ?_⟩
exact isSeparable_range hf
· exact hf.measurable.stronglyMeasurable
/-- A continuous function whose support is contained in a compact set is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) {k : Set α} (hk : IsCompact k)
(h'f : mulSupport f ⊆ k) : StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI : PseudoMetricSpace β := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric β
rw [stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable]
exact ⟨hf.measurable, (isCompact_range_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact hf hk h'f).isSeparable⟩
/-- A continuous function with compact support is strongly measurable. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.Continuous.stronglyMeasurable_of_hasCompactMulSupport
[MeasurableSpace α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OpensMeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β]
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [BorelSpace β] [One β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactMulSupport f) : StronglyMeasurable f :=
hf.stronglyMeasurable_of_mulSupport_subset_isCompact h'f (subset_mulTSupport f)
/-- A continuous function with compact support on a product space is strongly measurable for the
product sigma-algebra. The subtlety is that we do not assume that the spaces are separable, so the
product of the Borel sigma algebras might not contain all open sets, but still it contains enough
of them to approximate compactly supported continuous functions. -/
lemma _root_.HasCompactSupport.stronglyMeasurable_of_prod {X Y : Type*} [Zero α]
[TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] [MeasurableSpace X] [MeasurableSpace Y]
[OpensMeasurableSpace X] [OpensMeasurableSpace Y] [TopologicalSpace α] [PseudoMetrizableSpace α]
{f : X × Y → α} (hf : Continuous f) (h'f : HasCompactSupport f) :
StronglyMeasurable f := by
borelize α
apply stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨h'f.measurable_of_prod hf, ?_⟩
letI : PseudoMetricSpace α := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric α
exact IsCompact.isSeparable (s := range f) (h'f.isCompact_range hf)
/-- If `g` is a topological embedding, then `f` is strongly measurable iff `g ∘ f` is. -/
theorem _root_.Embedding.comp_stronglyMeasurable_iff {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β]
[PseudoMetrizableSpace β] [TopologicalSpace γ] [PseudoMetrizableSpace γ] {g : β → γ} {f : α → β}
(hg : IsEmbedding g) : (StronglyMeasurable fun x => g (f x)) ↔ StronglyMeasurable f := by
letI := pseudoMetrizableSpacePseudoMetric γ
borelize β γ
refine
⟨fun H => stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun H =>
hg.continuous.comp_stronglyMeasurable H⟩
· let G : β → range g := rangeFactorization g
have hG : IsClosedEmbedding G :=
{ hg.codRestrict _ _ with
isClosed_range := by
rw [surjective_onto_range.range_eq]
exact isClosed_univ }
have : Measurable (G ∘ f) := Measurable.subtype_mk H.measurable
exact hG.measurableEmbedding.measurable_comp_iff.1 this
· have : IsSeparable (g ⁻¹' range (g ∘ f)) := hg.isSeparable_preimage H.isSeparable_range
rwa [range_comp, hg.injective.preimage_image] at this
/-- A sequential limit of strongly measurable functions is strongly measurable. -/
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_tendsto {ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] [PseudoMetrizableSpace β] (u : Filter ι) [NeBot u] [IsCountablyGenerated u]
{f : ι → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ i, StronglyMeasurable (f i)) (lim : Tendsto f u (𝓝 g)) :
StronglyMeasurable g := by
borelize β
refine stronglyMeasurable_iff_measurable_separable.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact measurable_of_tendsto_metrizable' u (fun i => (hf i).measurable) lim
· rcases u.exists_seq_tendsto with ⟨v, hv⟩
have : IsSeparable (closure (⋃ i, range (f (v i)))) :=
.closure <| .iUnion fun i => (hf (v i)).isSeparable_range
apply this.mono
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
rw [tendsto_pi_nhds] at lim
apply mem_closure_of_tendsto ((lim x).comp hv)
filter_upwards with n
apply mem_iUnion_of_mem n
exact mem_range_self _
protected theorem piecewise {m : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {s : Set α}
{_ : DecidablePred (· ∈ s)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable (Set.piecewise s f g) := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.piecewise s hs (hf.approx n) (hg.approx n), fun x => ?_⟩
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hf.tendsto_approx x
· simpa [@Set.piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ => Classical.propDecidable _) _ hx,
hx] using hg.tendsto_approx x
/-- this is slightly different from `StronglyMeasurable.piecewise`. It can be used to show
`StronglyMeasurable (ite (x=0) 0 1)` by
`exact StronglyMeasurable.ite (measurableSet_singleton 0) stronglyMeasurable_const
stronglyMeasurable_const`, but replacing `StronglyMeasurable.ite` by
`StronglyMeasurable.piecewise` in that example proof does not work. -/
protected theorem ite {_ : MeasurableSpace α} [TopologicalSpace β] {p : α → Prop}
{_ : DecidablePred p} (hp : MeasurableSet { a : α | p a }) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f)
(hg : StronglyMeasurable g) : StronglyMeasurable fun x => ite (p x) (f x) (g x) :=
StronglyMeasurable.piecewise hp hf hg
@[measurability]
theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {g' : γ → β}
{mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mγ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hg' : StronglyMeasurable g') :
StronglyMeasurable (Function.extend g f g') := by
refine ⟨fun n => SimpleFunc.extend (hf.approx n) g hg (hg'.approx n), ?_⟩
intro x
by_cases hx : ∃ y, g y = x
· rcases hx with ⟨y, rfl⟩
simpa only [SimpleFunc.extend_apply, hg.injective, Injective.extend_apply] using
hf.tendsto_approx y
· simpa only [hx, SimpleFunc.extend_apply', not_false_iff, extend_apply'] using
hg'.tendsto_approx x
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/StronglyMeasurable/Basic.lean | 756 | 773 | theorem _root_.MeasurableEmbedding.exists_stronglyMeasurable_extend {f : α → β} {g : α → γ}
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {_ : MeasurableSpace γ} [TopologicalSpace β]
(hg : MeasurableEmbedding g) (hf : StronglyMeasurable f) (hne : γ → Nonempty β) :
∃ f' : γ → β, StronglyMeasurable f' ∧ f' ∘ g = f :=
⟨Function.extend g f fun x => Classical.choice (hne x),
hg.stronglyMeasurable_extend hf (stronglyMeasurable_const' fun _ _ => rfl),
funext fun _ => hg.injective.extend_apply _ _ _⟩
theorem _root_.stronglyMeasurable_of_stronglyMeasurable_union_cover {m : MeasurableSpace α}
[TopologicalSpace β] {f : α → β} (s t : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(h : univ ⊆ s ∪ t) (hc : StronglyMeasurable fun a : s => f a)
(hd : StronglyMeasurable fun a : t => f a) : StronglyMeasurable f := by | nontriviality β; inhabit β
suffices Function.extend Subtype.val (fun x : s ↦ f x)
(Function.extend (↑) (fun x : t ↦ f x) fun _ ↦ default) = f from
this ▸ (MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe hs).stronglyMeasurable_extend hc <|
(MeasurableEmbedding.subtype_coe ht).stronglyMeasurable_extend hd stronglyMeasurable_const
ext x |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Abs
/-!
# Lemmas about units in `ℤ`, which interact with the order structure.
-/
namespace Int
theorem isUnit_iff_abs_eq {x : ℤ} : IsUnit x ↔ abs x = 1 := by
rw [isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq, abs_eq_natAbs, ← Int.ofNat_one, natCast_inj]
theorem isUnit_sq {a : ℤ} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ^ 2 = 1 := by rw [sq, isUnit_mul_self ha]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Order/Units.lean | 21 | 21 | theorem units_sq (u : ℤˣ) : u ^ 2 = 1 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Finite
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Opposites
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Preserves.Shapes.Products
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Types.Shapes
import Mathlib.Topology.Category.TopCat.Limits.Products
/-!
# Yoneda presheaves on topologically concrete categories
This file develops some API for "topologically concrete" categories, defining universe polymorphic
"Yoneda presheaves" on such categories.
-/
universe w w' v u
open CategoryTheory Opposite Limits
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (F : C ⥤ TopCat.{w}) (Y : Type w') [TopologicalSpace Y]
namespace ContinuousMap
/--
A universe polymorphic "Yoneda presheaf" on `C` given by continuous maps into a topoological space
`Y`.
-/
@[simps]
def yonedaPresheaf : Cᵒᵖ ⥤ Type (max w w') where
obj X := C(F.obj (unop X), Y)
map f g := ContinuousMap.comp g (F.map f.unop).hom
/--
A universe polymorphic Yoneda presheaf on `TopCat` given by continuous maps into a topoological
space `Y`.
-/
@[simps]
def yonedaPresheaf' : TopCat.{w}ᵒᵖ ⥤ Type (max w w') where
obj X := C((unop X).1, Y)
map f g := ContinuousMap.comp g f.unop.hom
theorem comp_yonedaPresheaf' : yonedaPresheaf F Y = F.op ⋙ yonedaPresheaf' Y := rfl
| Mathlib/Topology/Category/TopCat/Yoneda.lean | 48 | 58 | theorem piComparison_fac {α : Type} (X : α → TopCat) :
piComparison (yonedaPresheaf'.{w, w'} Y) (fun x ↦ op (X x)) =
(yonedaPresheaf' Y).map ((opCoproductIsoProduct X).inv ≫ (TopCat.sigmaIsoSigma X).inv.op) ≫
(equivEquivIso (sigmaEquiv Y (fun x ↦ (X x).1))).inv ≫ (Types.productIso _).inv := by | rw [← Category.assoc, Iso.eq_comp_inv]
ext
simp only [yonedaPresheaf', unop_op, piComparison, types_comp_apply,
Types.productIso_hom_comp_eval_apply, Types.pi_lift_π_apply, comp_apply, TopCat.coe_of,
unop_comp, Quiver.Hom.unop_op, sigmaEquiv, equivEquivIso_hom, Equiv.toIso_inv,
Equiv.coe_fn_symm_mk, comp_assoc, sigmaMk_apply, ← opCoproductIsoProduct_inv_comp_ι]
rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Xavier Roblot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Xavier Roblot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Eigenspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Determinant
/-!
# Gershgorin's circle theorem
This file gives the proof of Gershgorin's circle theorem `eigenvalue_mem_ball` on the eigenvalues
of matrices and some applications.
## Reference
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gershgorin_circle_theorem
-/
variable {K n : Type*} [NormedField K] [Fintype n] [DecidableEq n] {A : Matrix n n K}
/-- **Gershgorin's circle theorem**: for any eigenvalue `μ` of a square matrix `A`, there exists an
index `k` such that `μ` lies in the closed ball of center the diagonal term `A k k` and of
radius the sum of the norms `∑ j ≠ k, ‖A k j‖. -/
theorem eigenvalue_mem_ball {μ : K} (hμ : Module.End.HasEigenvalue (Matrix.toLin' A) μ) :
∃ k, μ ∈ Metric.closedBall (A k k) (∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty n
· exfalso
exact hμ Submodule.eq_bot_of_subsingleton
· obtain ⟨v, h_eg, h_nz⟩ := hμ.exists_hasEigenvector
obtain ⟨i, -, h_i⟩ := Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup' Finset.univ_nonempty (fun i => ‖v i‖)
have h_nz : v i ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h_nz
ext j
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
refine (h_i ▸ Finset.le_sup' (fun i => ‖v i‖) (Finset.mem_univ j)).trans ?_
exact norm_le_zero_iff.mpr h_nz
have h_le : ∀ j, ‖v j * (v i)⁻¹‖ ≤ 1 := fun j => by
rw [norm_mul, norm_inv, mul_inv_le_iff₀ (norm_pos_iff.mpr h_nz), one_mul]
exact h_i ▸ Finset.le_sup' (fun i => ‖v i‖) (Finset.mem_univ j)
simp_rw [mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
refine ⟨i, ?_⟩
calc
_ = ‖(A i i * v i - μ * v i) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by congr; field_simp [h_nz]; ring
_ = ‖(A i i * v i - ∑ j, A i j * v j) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [show μ * v i = ∑ x : n, A i x * v x by
rw [← dotProduct, ← Matrix.mulVec]
exact (congrFun (Module.End.mem_eigenspace_iff.mp h_eg) i).symm]
_ = ‖(∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, A i j * v j) * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [Finset.sum_erase_eq_sub (Finset.mem_univ i), ← neg_sub, neg_mul, norm_neg]
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, ‖A i j‖ * ‖v j * (v i)⁻¹‖ := by
rw [Finset.sum_mul]
exact (norm_sum_le _ _).trans (le_of_eq (by simp_rw [mul_assoc, norm_mul]))
_ ≤ ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase i, ‖A i j‖ :=
(Finset.sum_le_sum fun j _ => mul_le_of_le_one_right (norm_nonneg _) (h_le j))
/-- If `A` is a row strictly dominant diagonal matrix, then it's determinant is nonzero. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Matrix/Gershgorin.lean | 59 | 66 | theorem det_ne_zero_of_sum_row_lt_diag (h : ∀ k, ∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖ < ‖A k k‖) :
A.det ≠ 0 := by | contrapose! h
suffices ∃ k, 0 ∈ Metric.closedBall (A k k) (∑ j ∈ Finset.univ.erase k, ‖A k j‖) by
exact this.imp (fun a h ↦ by rwa [mem_closedBall_iff_norm', sub_zero] at h)
refine eigenvalue_mem_ball ?_
rw [Module.End.hasEigenvalue_iff, Module.End.eigenspace_zero, ne_comm]
exact ne_of_lt (LinearMap.bot_lt_ker_of_det_eq_zero (by rwa [LinearMap.det_toLin'])) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Emilie Burgun. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Emilie Burgun
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Pointwise.Set.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Basic
import Mathlib.Dynamics.PeriodicPts.Defs
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Defs
/-!
# Properties of `fixedPoints` and `fixedBy`
This module contains some useful properties of `MulAction.fixedPoints` and `MulAction.fixedBy`
that don't directly belong to `Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Basic`.
## Main theorems
* `MulAction.fixedBy_mul`: `fixedBy α (g * h) ⊆ fixedBy α g ∪ fixedBy α h`
* `MulAction.fixedBy_conj` and `MulAction.smul_fixedBy`: the pointwise group action of `h` on
`fixedBy α g` is equal to the `fixedBy` set of the conjugation of `h` with `g`
(`fixedBy α (h * g * h⁻¹)`).
* `MulAction.set_mem_fixedBy_of_movedBy_subset` shows that if a set `s` is a superset of
`(fixedBy α g)ᶜ`, then the group action of `g` cannot send elements of `s` outside of `s`.
This is expressed as `s ∈ fixedBy (Set α) g`, and `MulAction.set_mem_fixedBy_iff` allows one
to convert the relationship back to `g • x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s`.
* `MulAction.not_commute_of_disjoint_smul_movedBy` allows one to prove that `g` and `h`
do not commute from the disjointness of the `(fixedBy α g)ᶜ` set and `h • (fixedBy α g)ᶜ`,
which is a property used in the proof of Rubin's theorem.
The theorems above are also available for `AddAction`.
## Pointwise group action and `fixedBy (Set α) g`
Since `fixedBy α g = { x | g • x = x }` by definition, properties about the pointwise action of
a set `s : Set α` can be expressed using `fixedBy (Set α) g`.
To properly use theorems using `fixedBy (Set α) g`, you should `open Pointwise` in your file.
`s ∈ fixedBy (Set α) g` means that `g • s = s`, which is equivalent to say that
`∀ x, g • x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s` (the translation can be done using `MulAction.set_mem_fixedBy_iff`).
`s ∈ fixedBy (Set α) g` is a weaker statement than `s ⊆ fixedBy α g`: the latter requires that
all points in `s` are fixed by `g`, whereas the former only requires that `g • x ∈ s`.
-/
namespace MulAction
open Pointwise
variable {α : Type*}
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] [MulAction G α]
variable {M : Type*} [Monoid M] [MulAction M α]
section FixedPoints
variable (α) in
/-- In a multiplicative group action, the points fixed by `g` are also fixed by `g⁻¹` -/
@[to_additive (attr := simp)
"In an additive group action, the points fixed by `g` are also fixed by `g⁻¹`"]
theorem fixedBy_inv (g : G) : fixedBy α g⁻¹ = fixedBy α g := by
ext
rw [mem_fixedBy, mem_fixedBy, inv_smul_eq_iff, eq_comm]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/FixedPoints.lean | 65 | 68 | theorem smul_mem_fixedBy_iff_mem_fixedBy {a : α} {g : G} :
g • a ∈ fixedBy α g ↔ a ∈ fixedBy α g := by | rw [mem_fixedBy, smul_left_cancel_iff]
rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 233 | 235 | theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by | rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Manuel Candales
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Subspace
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse
/-!
# Angles between vectors
This file defines unoriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `InnerProductGeometry.angle` is the undirected angle between two vectors.
## TODO
Prove the triangle inequality for the angle.
-/
assert_not_exists HasFDerivAt ConformalAt
noncomputable section
open Real Set
open Real
open RealInnerProductSpace
namespace InnerProductGeometry
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] {x y : V}
/-- The undirected angle between two vectors. If either vector is 0,
this is π/2. See `Orientation.oangle` for the corresponding oriented angle
definition. -/
def angle (x y : V) : ℝ :=
Real.arccos (⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖))
theorem continuousAt_angle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => angle y.1 y.2) x := by
unfold angle
fun_prop (disch := simp [*])
theorem angle_smul_smul {c : ℝ} (hc : c ≠ 0) (x y : V) : angle (c • x) (c • y) = angle x y := by
have : c * c ≠ 0 := mul_ne_zero hc hc
rw [angle, angle, real_inner_smul_left, inner_smul_right, norm_smul, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs,
mul_mul_mul_comm _ ‖x‖, abs_mul_abs_self, ← mul_assoc c c, mul_div_mul_left _ _ this]
@[simp]
theorem _root_.LinearIsometry.angle_map {E F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup F]
[InnerProductSpace ℝ E] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F] (f : E →ₗᵢ[ℝ] F) (u v : E) :
angle (f u) (f v) = angle u v := by
rw [angle, angle, f.inner_map_map, f.norm_map, f.norm_map]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem _root_.Submodule.angle_coe {s : Submodule ℝ V} (x y : s) :
angle (x : V) (y : V) = angle x y :=
s.subtypeₗᵢ.angle_map x y
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors. -/
theorem cos_angle (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) :=
Real.cos_arccos (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
(abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
/-- The angle between two vectors does not depend on their order. -/
theorem angle_comm (x y : V) : angle x y = angle y x := by
unfold angle
rw [real_inner_comm, mul_comm]
/-- The angle between the negation of two vectors. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_neg (x y : V) : angle (-x) (-y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_neg_neg, norm_neg, norm_neg]
/-- The angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ angle x y :=
Real.arccos_nonneg _
/-- The angle between two vectors is at most π. -/
theorem angle_le_pi (x y : V) : angle x y ≤ π :=
Real.arccos_le_pi _
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors is nonnegative. -/
theorem sin_angle_nonneg (x y : V) : 0 ≤ sin (angle x y) :=
sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (angle_nonneg x y) (angle_le_pi x y)
/-- The angle between a vector and the negation of another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_right (x y : V) : angle x (-y) = π - angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [← Real.arccos_neg, norm_neg, inner_neg_right, neg_div]
/-- The angle between the negation of a vector and another vector. -/
theorem angle_neg_left (x y : V) : angle (-x) y = π - angle x y := by
rw [← angle_neg_neg, neg_neg, angle_neg_right]
proof_wanted angle_triangle (x y z : V) : angle x z ≤ angle x y + angle y z
/-- The angle between the zero vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_left (x : V) : angle 0 x = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_left, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
/-- The angle between a vector and the zero vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_zero_right (x : V) : angle x 0 = π / 2 := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_zero_right, zero_div, Real.arccos_zero]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_self {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x x = 0 := by
unfold angle
rw [← real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, div_self (inner_self_ne_zero.2 hx : ⟪x, x⟫ ≠ 0),
Real.arccos_one]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_self_neg_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle x (-x) = π := by
rw [angle_neg_right, angle_self hx, sub_zero]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that
vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_neg_self_of_nonzero {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : angle (-x) x = π := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_self_neg_of_nonzero hx]
/-- The angle between a vector and a positive multiple of a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle x (r • y) = angle x y := by
unfold angle
rw [inner_smul_right, norm_smul, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg (le_of_lt hr), ← mul_assoc,
mul_comm _ r, mul_assoc, mul_div_mul_left _ _ (ne_of_gt hr)]
/-- The angle between a positive multiple of a vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : angle (r • x) y = angle x y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_pos y x hr, angle_comm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a negative multiple of a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
angle x (r • y) = angle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, angle_neg_right, angle_smul_right_of_pos x y (neg_pos_of_neg hr),
angle_neg_right]
/-- The angle between a negative multiple of a vector and a vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem angle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) : angle (r • x) y = angle (-x) y := by
rw [angle_comm, angle_smul_right_of_neg y x hr, angle_comm]
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors, multiplied by the
product of their norms. -/
theorem cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) : Real.cos (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = ⟪x, y⟫ := by
rw [cos_angle, div_mul_cancel_of_imp]
simp +contextual [or_imp]
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors, multiplied by the
product of their norms. -/
theorem sin_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm (x y : V) :
Real.sin (angle x y) * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) = √(⟪x, x⟫ * ⟪y, y⟫ - ⟪x, y⟫ * ⟪x, y⟫) := by
unfold angle
rw [Real.sin_arccos, ← Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
← Real.sqrt_mul' _ (mul_self_nonneg _), sq,
Real.sqrt_mul_self (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm, real_inner_self_eq_norm_mul_norm]
by_cases h : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ = 0
· rw [show ‖x‖ * ‖x‖ * (‖y‖ * ‖y‖) = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) by ring, h, mul_zero,
mul_zero, zero_sub]
rcases eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_mul_eq_zero h with hx | hy
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hx
rw [hx, inner_zero_left, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· rw [norm_eq_zero] at hy
rw [hy, inner_zero_right, zero_mul, neg_zero]
· -- takes 600ms; squeezing the "equivalent" simp call yields an invalid result
field_simp [h]
ring_nf
/-- The angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are
nonzero and one is a positive multiple of the other. -/
theorem angle_eq_zero_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = 0 ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, 0 < r ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_zero, LE.le.le_iff_eq,
eq_comm]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).2
/-- The angle between two vectors is π if and only if they are nonzero
and one is a negative multiple of the other. -/
theorem angle_eq_pi_iff {x y : V} : angle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ ∃ r : ℝ, r < 0 ∧ y = r • x := by
rw [angle, ← real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_eq_neg_one_iff, Real.arccos_eq_pi, LE.le.le_iff_eq]
exact (abs_le.mp (abs_real_inner_div_norm_mul_norm_le_one x y)).1
/-- If the angle between two vectors is π, the angles between those
vectors and a third vector add to π. -/
theorem angle_add_angle_eq_pi_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (z : V) (h : angle x y = π) :
angle x z + angle y z = π := by
rcases angle_eq_pi_iff.1 h with ⟨_, ⟨r, ⟨hr, rfl⟩⟩⟩
rw [angle_smul_left_of_neg x z hr, angle_neg_left, add_sub_cancel]
/-- Two vectors have inner product 0 if and only if the angle between
them is π/2. -/
theorem inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) : ⟪x, y⟫ = 0 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 :=
Iff.symm <| by simp +contextual [angle, or_imp]
/-- If the angle between two vectors is π, the inner product equals the negative product
of the norms. -/
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
/-- If the angle between two vectors is 0, the inner product equals the product of the norms. -/
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by
simp [← cos_angle_mul_norm_mul_norm, h]
/-- The inner product of two non-zero vectors equals the negative product of their norms
if and only if the angle between the two vectors is π. -/
theorem inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, neg_div, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_neg_one]
/-- The inner product of two non-zero vectors equals the product of their norms
if and only if the angle between the two vectors is 0. -/
theorem inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
have h₁ : ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := (mul_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) (norm_pos_iff.mpr hy)).ne'
rw [angle, h, div_self h₁, Real.arccos_one]
/-- If the angle between two vectors is π, the norm of their difference equals
the sum of their norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : angle x y = π) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_sub_pow_two_real, inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_pi h]
ring
/-- If the angle between two vectors is 0, the norm of their sum equals
the sum of their norms. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ (norm_nonneg (x + y)) (add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)),
norm_add_pow_two_real, inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h]
ring
/-- If the angle between two vectors is 0, the norm of their difference equals
the absolute value of the difference of their norms. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : angle x y = 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ (norm_nonneg (x - y)) (abs_nonneg (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)), norm_sub_pow_two_real,
inner_eq_mul_norm_of_angle_eq_zero h, sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)]
ring
/-- The norm of the difference of two non-zero vectors equals the sum of their norms
if and only the angle between the two vectors is π. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = π := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_pi⟩
rw [← inner_eq_neg_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_pi hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x - y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = (‖x‖ ^ 2 + ‖y‖ ^ 2 - (‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = -(‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by ring
/-- The norm of the sum of two non-zero vectors equals the sum of their norms
if and only the angle between the two vectors is 0. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_add_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x‖ + ‖y‖ ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_add_eq_add_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
obtain ⟨hxy₁, hxy₂⟩ := norm_nonneg (x + y), add_nonneg (norm_nonneg x) (norm_nonneg y)
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ hxy₁ hxy₂, norm_add_pow_two_real] at h
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
/-- The norm of the difference of two non-zero vectors equals the absolute value
of the difference of their norms if and only the angle between the two vectors is 0. -/
theorem norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
‖x - y‖ = |‖x‖ - ‖y‖| ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, norm_sub_eq_abs_sub_norm_of_angle_eq_zero⟩
rw [← inner_eq_mul_norm_iff_angle_eq_zero hx hy]
have h1 : ‖x - y‖ ^ 2 = (‖x‖ - ‖y‖) ^ 2 := by
rw [h]
exact sq_abs (‖x‖ - ‖y‖)
rw [norm_sub_pow_two_real] at h1
calc
⟪x, y⟫ = ((‖x‖ + ‖y‖) ^ 2 - ‖x‖ ^ 2 - ‖y‖ ^ 2) / 2 := by linarith
_ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ := by ring
/-- The norm of the sum of two vectors equals the norm of their difference if and only if
the angle between them is π/2. -/
theorem norm_add_eq_norm_sub_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two (x y : V) :
‖x + y‖ = ‖x - y‖ ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [← sq_eq_sq₀ (norm_nonneg (x + y)) (norm_nonneg (x - y)),
← inner_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two x y, norm_add_pow_two_real, norm_sub_pow_two_real]
constructor <;> intro h <;> linarith
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors is 1 if and only if the angle is 0. -/
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero : cos (angle x y) = 1 ↔ angle x y = 0 := by
rw [← cos_zero]
exact injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩ (left_mem_Icc.2 pi_pos.le)
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors is 0 if and only if the angle is π / 2. -/
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two : cos (angle x y) = 0 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two]
apply injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩
constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The cosine of the angle between two vectors is -1 if and only if the angle is π. -/
theorem cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi : cos (angle x y) = -1 ↔ angle x y = π := by
rw [← cos_pi]
exact injOn_cos.eq_iff ⟨angle_nonneg x y, angle_le_pi x y⟩ (right_mem_Icc.2 pi_pos.le)
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors is 0 if and only if the angle is 0 or π. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Unoriented/Basic.lean | 323 | 333 | theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero_or_angle_eq_pi :
sin (angle x y) = 0 ↔ angle x y = 0 ∨ angle x y = π := by | rw [sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq, cos_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_zero, cos_eq_neg_one_iff_angle_eq_pi]
/-- The sine of the angle between two vectors is 1 if and only if the angle is π / 2. -/
theorem sin_eq_one_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two : sin (angle x y) = 1 ↔ angle x y = π / 2 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => by rw [h, sin_pi_div_two]⟩
rw [← cos_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_pi_div_two, ← abs_eq_zero, abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, h]
simp
end InnerProductGeometry |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mitchell Lee
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Monoid.Defs
/-!
# Lemmas on infinite sums and products in topological monoids
This file contains many simple lemmas on `tsum`, `HasSum` etc, which are placed here in order to
keep the basic file of definitions as short as possible.
Results requiring a group (rather than monoid) structure on the target should go in `Group.lean`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter Finset Function Topology
variable {α β γ : Type*}
section HasProd
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α]
variable {f g : β → α} {a b : α}
/-- Constant one function has product `1` -/
@[to_additive "Constant zero function has sum `0`"]
theorem hasProd_one : HasProd (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) 1 := by simp [HasProd, tendsto_const_nhds]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_empty [IsEmpty β] : HasProd f 1 := by
convert @hasProd_one α β _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_one : Multipliable (fun _ ↦ 1 : β → α) :=
hasProd_one.multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_empty [IsEmpty β] : Multipliable f :=
hasProd_empty.multipliable
/-- See `multipliable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `summable_congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem multipliable_congr (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
iff_of_eq (congr_arg Multipliable <| funext hfg)
/-- See `Multipliable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set. -/
@[to_additive "See `Summable.congr_cofinite` for a version allowing the functions to
disagree on a finite set."]
theorem Multipliable.congr (hf : Multipliable f) (hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : Multipliable g :=
(multipliable_congr hfg).mp hf
@[to_additive]
lemma HasProd.congr_fun (hf : HasProd f a) (h : ∀ x : β, g x = f x) : HasProd g a :=
(funext h : g = f) ▸ hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq {g : γ → α}
(h_eq : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(hf : HasProd g a) : HasProd f a :=
le_trans (map_atTop_finset_prod_le_of_prod_eq h_eq) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd {g : γ → α}
(h₁ : ∀ u : Finset γ, ∃ v : Finset β, ∀ v', v ⊆ v' →
∃ u', u ⊆ u' ∧ ∏ x ∈ u', g x = ∏ b ∈ v', f b)
(h₂ : ∀ v : Finset β, ∃ u : Finset γ, ∀ u', u ⊆ u' →
∃ v', v ⊆ v' ∧ ∏ b ∈ v', f b = ∏ x ∈ u', g x) :
HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
⟨HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₂, HasProd.hasProd_of_prod_eq h₁⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.multipliable_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g)
(hf : ∀ x ∉ Set.range g, f x = 1) : Multipliable (f ∘ g) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hg.hasProd_iff hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem hasProd_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (extend g f 1) a ↔ HasProd f a := by
rw [← hg.hasProd_iff, extend_comp hg]
exact extend_apply' _ _
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem multipliable_extend_one {g : β → γ} (hg : Injective g) :
Multipliable (extend g f 1) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_extend_one hg
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a ↔ HasProd (s.mulIndicator f) a := by
rw [← Set.mulIndicator_range_comp, Subtype.range_coe,
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset]
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_subtype_iff_mulIndicator {s : Set β} :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) ↔ Multipliable (s.mulIndicator f) :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem hasProd_subtype_mulSupport : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : mulSupport f → α) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
hasProd_subtype_iff_of_mulSupport_subset <| Set.Subset.refl _
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Finset.multipliable (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (↑s : Set β) → α) :=
(s.hasProd f).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Set.Finite.multipliable {s : Set β} (hs : s.Finite) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) := by
have := hs.toFinset.multipliable f
rwa [hs.coe_toFinset] at this
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport (h : (mulSupport f).Finite) : Multipliable f := by
apply multipliable_of_ne_finset_one (s := h.toFinset); simp
@[to_additive]
lemma Multipliable.of_finite [Finite β] {f : β → α} : Multipliable f :=
multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport <| Set.finite_univ.subset (Set.subset_univ _)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_single {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ (b') (_ : b' ≠ b), f b' = 1) : HasProd f (f b) :=
suffices HasProd f (∏ b' ∈ {b}, f b') by simpa using this
hasProd_prod_of_ne_finset_one <| by simpa [hf]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] lemma hasProd_unique [Unique β] (f : β → α) : HasProd f (f default) :=
hasProd_single default (fun _ hb ↦ False.elim <| hb <| Unique.uniq ..)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma hasProd_singleton (m : β) (f : β → α) : HasProd (({m} : Set β).restrict f) (f m) :=
hasProd_unique (Set.restrict {m} f)
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
HasProd (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) a := by
convert @hasProd_single _ _ _ _ (fun b' ↦ if b' = b then a else 1) b (fun b' hb' ↦ if_neg hb')
exact (if_pos rfl).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : HasProd (f ∘ e) a ↔ HasProd f a :=
e.injective.hasProd_iff <| by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Injective.hasProd_range_iff {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) :
HasProd (fun x : Set.range g ↦ f x) a ↔ HasProd (f ∘ g) a :=
(Equiv.ofInjective g hg).hasProd_iff.symm
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff (e : γ ≃ β) : Multipliable (f ∘ e) ↔ Multipliable f :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a := by
have : (g ∘ (↑)) ∘ e = f ∘ (↑) := funext he
rw [← hasProd_subtype_mulSupport, ← this, e.hasProd_iff, hasProd_subtype_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_iff_hasProd_of_ne_one_bij {g : γ → α} (i : mulSupport g → β)
(hi : Injective i) (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range i)
(hfg : ∀ x, f (i x) = g x) : HasProd f a ↔ HasProd g a :=
Iff.symm <|
Equiv.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport
(Equiv.ofBijective (fun x ↦ ⟨i x, fun hx ↦ x.coe_prop <| hfg x ▸ hx⟩)
⟨fun _ _ h ↦ hi <| Subtype.ext_iff.1 h, fun y ↦
(hf y.coe_prop).imp fun _ hx ↦ Subtype.ext hx⟩)
hfg
@[to_additive]
theorem Equiv.multipliable_iff_of_mulSupport {g : γ → α} (e : mulSupport f ≃ mulSupport g)
(he : ∀ x : mulSupport f, g (e x) = f x) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
exists_congr fun _ ↦ e.hasProd_iff_of_mulSupport he
@[to_additive]
protected theorem HasProd.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : HasProd f a) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) := by
have : (g ∘ fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, f b) = fun s : Finset β ↦ ∏ b ∈ s, (g ∘ f) b :=
funext <| map_prod g _
unfold HasProd
rw [← this]
exact (hg.tendsto a).comp hf
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Topology.IsInducing.hasProd_iff [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) (a : α) :
HasProd (g ∘ f) (g a) ↔ HasProd f a := by
simp_rw [HasProd, comp_apply, ← map_prod]
exact hg.tendsto_nhds_iff.symm
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")] alias Inducing.hasProd_iff := IsInducing.hasProd_iff
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] (hf : Multipliable f) {G}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) :=
(hf.hasProd.map g hg).multipliable
@[to_additive]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G G'}
[FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] [FunLike G' γ α] [MonoidHomClass G' γ α]
(g : G) (g' : G') (hg : Continuous g) (hg' : Continuous g') (hinv : Function.LeftInverse g' g) :
Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
⟨fun h ↦ by
have := h.map _ hg'
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc, hinv.id] at this, fun h ↦ h.map _ hg⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.map_tprod [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] [T2Space γ] (hf : Multipliable f)
{G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g) :
g (∏' i, f i) = ∏' i, g (f i) := (HasProd.tprod_eq (HasProd.map hf.hasProd g hg)).symm
@[to_additive]
lemma Topology.IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ]
[T2Space γ] {G} [FunLike G α γ] [MonoidHomClass G α γ] {g : G} (hg : IsInducing g) (f : β → α) :
Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable (g ∘ f) ∧ ∏' i, g (f i) ∈ Set.range g := by
constructor
· intro hf
constructor
· exact hf.map g hg.continuous
· use ∏' i, f i
exact hf.map_tprod g hg.continuous
· rintro ⟨hgf, a, ha⟩
use a
have := hgf.hasProd
simp_rw [comp_apply, ← ha] at this
exact (hg.hasProd_iff f a).mp this
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-28")]
alias Inducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range :=
IsInducing.multipliable_iff_tprod_comp_mem_range
/-- "A special case of `Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience" -/
@[to_additive "A special case of `Summable.map_iff_of_leftInverse` for convenience"]
protected theorem Multipliable.map_iff_of_equiv [CommMonoid γ] [TopologicalSpace γ] {G}
[EquivLike G α γ] [MulEquivClass G α γ] (g : G) (hg : Continuous g)
(hg' : Continuous (EquivLike.inv g : γ → α)) : Multipliable (g ∘ f) ↔ Multipliable f :=
Multipliable.map_iff_of_leftInverse g (g : α ≃* γ).symm hg hg' (EquivLike.left_inv g)
@[to_additive]
theorem Function.Surjective.multipliable_iff_of_hasProd_iff {α' : Type*} [CommMonoid α']
[TopologicalSpace α'] {e : α' → α} (hes : Function.Surjective e) {f : β → α} {g : γ → α'}
(he : ∀ {a}, HasProd f (e a) ↔ HasProd g a) : Multipliable f ↔ Multipliable g :=
hes.exists.trans <| exists_congr <| @he
variable [ContinuousMul α]
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul (hf : HasProd f a) (hg : HasProd g b) :
HasProd (fun b ↦ f b * g b) (a * b) := by
dsimp only [HasProd] at hf hg ⊢
simp_rw [prod_mul_distrib]
exact hf.mul hg
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul (hf : Multipliable f) (hg : Multipliable g) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ f b * g b :=
(hf.hasProd.mul hg.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod {f : γ → β → α} {a : γ → α} {s : Finset γ} :
(∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f i) (a i)) → HasProd (fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
classical
exact Finset.induction_on s (by simp only [hasProd_one, prod_empty, forall_true_iff]) <| by
simp +contextual only [mem_insert, forall_eq_or_imp, not_false_iff,
prod_insert, and_imp]
exact fun x s _ IH hx h ↦ hx.mul (IH h)
@[to_additive]
theorem multipliable_prod {f : γ → β → α} {s : Finset γ} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, Multipliable (f i)) :
Multipliable fun b ↦ ∏ i ∈ s, f i b :=
(hasProd_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i hi).hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_disjoint {s t : Set β} (hs : Disjoint s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (s ∪ t : Set β) → α) (a * b) := by
rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Set.mulIndicator_union_of_disjoint hs]
exact ha.mul hb
@[to_additive]
theorem hasProd_prod_disjoint {ι} (s : Finset ι) {t : ι → Set β} {a : ι → α}
(hs : (s : Set ι).Pairwise (Disjoint on t)) (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t i → α) (a i)) :
HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (⋃ i ∈ s, t i) → α) (∏ i ∈ s, a i) := by
simp_rw [hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator] at *
rw [Finset.mulIndicator_biUnion _ _ hs]
exact hasProd_prod hf
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_isCompl {s t : Set β} (hs : IsCompl s t) (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : t → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) := by
simpa [← hs.compl_eq] using
(hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 ha).mul (hasProd_subtype_iff_mulIndicator.1 hb)
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.mul_compl {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.mul_compl {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.mul_compl hsc.hasProd).multipliable
@[to_additive]
theorem HasProd.compl_mul {s : Set β} (ha : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α) a)
(hb : HasProd (f ∘ (↑) : s → α) b) : HasProd f (a * b) :=
ha.mul_isCompl isCompl_compl.symm hb
@[to_additive]
theorem Multipliable.compl_add {s : Set β} (hs : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : (sᶜ : Set β) → α))
(hsc : Multipliable (f ∘ (↑) : s → α)) : Multipliable f :=
(hs.hasProd.compl_mul hsc.hasProd).multipliable
/-- Version of `HasProd.update` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`,
it gives a relationship between the products of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `HasSum.update` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that `f.update` has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `f.update` given that both exist."]
theorem HasProd.update' {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a a' : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (x : α)
(hf' : HasProd (update f b x) a') : a * x = a' * f b := by
have : ∀ b', f b' * ite (b' = b) x 1 = update f b x b' * ite (b' = b) (f b) 1 := by
intro b'
split_ifs with hb'
· simpa only [Function.update_apply, hb', eq_self_iff_true] using mul_comm (f b) x
· simp only [Function.update_apply, hb', if_false]
have h := hf.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b x)
simp_rw [this] at h
exact HasProd.unique h (hf'.mul (hasProd_ite_eq b (f b)))
/-- Version of `hasProd_ite_div_hasProd` for `CommMonoid` rather than `CommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific product in terms of `HasProd`, it gives
a relationship between the products of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist. -/
@[to_additive "Version of `hasSum_ite_sub_hasSum` for `AddCommMonoid` rather than `AddCommGroup`.
Rather than showing that the `ite` expression has a specific sum in terms of `HasSum`,
it gives a relationship between the sums of `f` and `ite (n = b) 0 (f n)` given that both exist."]
theorem eq_mul_of_hasProd_ite {α β : Type*} [TopologicalSpace α] [CommMonoid α] [T2Space α]
[ContinuousMul α] [DecidableEq β] {f : β → α} {a : α} (hf : HasProd f a) (b : β) (a' : α)
(hf' : HasProd (fun n ↦ ite (n = b) 1 (f n)) a') : a = a' * f b := by
refine (mul_one a).symm.trans (hf.update' b 1 ?_)
convert hf'
apply update_apply
end HasProd
section tprod
variable [CommMonoid α] [TopologicalSpace α] {f g : β → α}
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_set_coe (f : β → α) {s t : Set β} (h : s = t) :
∏' x : s, f x = ∏' x : t, f x := by rw [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr_subtype (f : β → α) {P Q : β → Prop} (h : ∀ x, P x ↔ Q x) :
∏' x : {x // P x}, f x = ∏' x : {x // Q x}, f x :=
tprod_congr_set_coe f <| Set.ext h
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_finprod (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ᶠ b, f b := by simp [tprod_def, multipliable_of_finite_mulSupport hf, hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod' {s : Finset β} (hf : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_finprod (s.finite_toSet.subset hf), finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_prod {s : Finset β} (hf : ∀ b ∉ s, f b = 1) :
∏' b, f b = ∏ b ∈ s, f b :=
tprod_eq_prod' <| mulSupport_subset_iff'.2 hf
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_one : ∏' _ : β, (1 : α) = 1 := by rw [tprod_eq_finprod] <;> simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_empty [IsEmpty β] : ∏' b, f b = 1 := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := (∅ : Finset β))] <;> simp
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_congr {f g : β → α}
(hfg : ∀ b, f b = g b) : ∏' b, f b = ∏' b, g b :=
congr_arg tprod (funext hfg)
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_fintype [Fintype β] (f : β → α) : ∏' b, f b = ∏ b, f b := by
apply tprod_eq_prod; simp
@[to_additive]
theorem prod_eq_tprod_mulIndicator (f : β → α) (s : Finset β) :
∏ x ∈ s, f x = ∏' x, Set.mulIndicator (↑s) f x := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod' (Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator_subset),
Finset.prod_mulIndicator_subset _ Finset.Subset.rfl]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_bool (f : Bool → α) : ∏' i : Bool, f i = f false * f true := by
rw [tprod_fintype, Fintype.prod_bool, mul_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_eq_mulSingle {f : β → α} (b : β) (hf : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' = 1) :
∏' b, f b = f b := by
rw [tprod_eq_prod (s := {b}), prod_singleton]
exact fun b' hb' ↦ hf b' (by simpa using hb')
@[to_additive]
theorem tprod_tprod_eq_mulSingle (f : β → γ → α) (b : β) (c : γ) (hfb : ∀ b' ≠ b, f b' c = 1)
(hfc : ∀ b', ∀ c' ≠ c, f b' c' = 1) : ∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = f b c :=
calc
∏' (b') (c'), f b' c' = ∏' b', f b' c := tprod_congr fun b' ↦ tprod_eq_mulSingle _ (hfc b')
_ = f b c := tprod_eq_mulSingle _ hfb
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_ite_eq (b : β) [DecidablePred (· = b)] (a : α) :
∏' b', (if b' = b then a else 1) = a := by
rw [tprod_eq_mulSingle b]
· simp
· intro b' hb'; simp [hb']
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : { x // x ∈ s }, f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by
rw [← prod_attach]; exact tprod_fintype _
@[to_additive]
theorem Finset.tprod_subtype' (s : Finset β) (f : β → α) :
∏' x : (s : Set β), f x = ∏ x ∈ s, f x := by simp
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem tprod_singleton (b : β) (f : β → α) : ∏' x : ({b} : Set β), f x = f b := by
rw [← coe_singleton, Finset.tprod_subtype', prod_singleton]
open scoped Classical in
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Topology/Algebra/InfiniteSum/Basic.lean | 444 | 445 | theorem Function.Injective.tprod_eq {g : γ → β} (hg : Injective g) {f : β → α}
(hf : mulSupport f ⊆ Set.range g) : ∏' c, f (g c) = ∏' b, f b := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot, Johannes Hölzl, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Support
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Real
/-!
# Normed (semi)groups
In this file we define 10 classes:
* `Norm`, `NNNorm`: auxiliary classes endowing a type `α` with a function `norm : α → ℝ`
(notation: `‖x‖`) and `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` (notation: `‖x‖₊`), respectively;
* `Seminormed...Group`: A seminormed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative)
group with a norm and a compatible pseudometric space structure:
`∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖` or `∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖`, depending on the group operation.
* `Normed...Group`: A normed (additive) (commutative) group is an (additive) (commutative) group
with a norm and a compatible metric space structure.
We also prove basic properties of (semi)normed groups and provide some instances.
## Notes
The current convention `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` means that the distance is invariant under right
addition, but actions in mathlib are usually from the left. This means we might want to change it to
`dist x y = ‖-x + y‖`.
The normed group hierarchy would lend itself well to a mixin design (that is, having
`SeminormedGroup` and `SeminormedAddGroup` not extend `Group` and `AddGroup`), but we choose not
to for performance concerns.
## Tags
normed group
-/
variable {𝓕 α ι κ E F G : Type*}
open Filter Function Metric Bornology
open ENNReal Filter NNReal Uniformity Pointwise Topology
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `E` with a function `norm : E → ℝ` with notation `‖x‖`. This
class is designed to be extended in more interesting classes specifying the properties of the norm.
-/
@[notation_class]
class Norm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ`-valued norm function. -/
norm : E → ℝ
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `nnnorm : α → ℝ≥0` with notation `‖x‖₊`. -/
@[notation_class]
class NNNorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0`-valued norm function. -/
nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0
/-- Auxiliary class, endowing a type `α` with a function `enorm : α → ℝ≥0∞` with notation `‖x‖ₑ`. -/
@[notation_class]
class ENorm (E : Type*) where
/-- the `ℝ≥0∞`-valued norm function. -/
enorm : E → ℝ≥0∞
export Norm (norm)
export NNNorm (nnnorm)
export ENorm (enorm)
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖" => norm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖₊" => nnnorm e
@[inherit_doc] notation "‖" e "‖ₑ" => enorm e
section ENorm
variable {E : Type*} [NNNorm E] {x : E} {r : ℝ≥0}
instance NNNorm.toENorm : ENorm E where enorm := (‖·‖₊ : E → ℝ≥0∞)
lemma enorm_eq_nnnorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp] lemma toNNReal_enorm (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toNNReal = ‖x‖₊ := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_le_enorm : r ≤ ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r ≤ ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_le_coe : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ r ↔ ‖x‖₊ ≤ r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_lt_enorm : r < ‖x‖ₑ ↔ r < ‖x‖₊ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma enorm_lt_coe : ‖x‖ₑ < r ↔ ‖x‖₊ < r := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_ne_top : ‖x‖ₑ ≠ ∞ := by simp [enorm]
@[simp] lemma enorm_lt_top : ‖x‖ₑ < ∞ := by simp [enorm]
end ENorm
/-- A type `E` equipped with a continuous map `‖·‖ₑ : E → ℝ≥0∞`
NB. We do not demand that the topology is somehow defined by the enorm:
for ℝ≥0∞ (the motivating example behind this definition), this is not true. -/
class ContinuousENorm (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENorm E where
continuous_enorm : Continuous enorm
/-- An enormed monoid is an additive monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
class ENormedAddMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, AddMonoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 0
protected enorm_add_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x + y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed monoid is a monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ContinuousENorm E, Monoid E where
enorm_eq_zero : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ₑ = 0 ↔ x = 1
enorm_mul_le : ∀ x y : E, ‖x * y‖ₑ ≤ ‖x‖ₑ + ‖y‖ₑ
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is an additive commutative monoid
endowed with a continuous enorm.
We don't have `ENormedAddCommMonoid` extend `EMetricSpace`, since the canonical instance `ℝ≥0∞`
is not an `EMetricSpace`. This is because `ℝ≥0∞` carries the order topology, which is distinct from
the topology coming from `edist`. -/
class ENormedAddCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E]
extends ENormedAddMonoid E, AddCommMonoid E where
/-- An enormed commutative monoid is a commutative monoid endowed with a continuous enorm. -/
@[to_additive]
class ENormedCommMonoid (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] extends ENormedMonoid E, CommMonoid E where
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a
pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, Group E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
class SeminormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E,
PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A seminormed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖`
defines a pseudometric space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class SeminormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, PseudoMetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is an additive group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x - y‖` defines a
metric space structure. -/
class NormedAddCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, AddCommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x - y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x - y‖ := by aesop
/-- A normed group is a group endowed with a norm for which `dist x y = ‖x / y‖` defines a metric
space structure. -/
@[to_additive]
class NormedCommGroup (E : Type*) extends Norm E, CommGroup E, MetricSpace E where
dist := fun x y => ‖x / y‖
/-- The distance function is induced by the norm. -/
dist_eq : ∀ x y, dist x y = ‖x / y‖ := by aesop
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedGroup.toSeminormedGroup [NormedGroup E] : SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toSeminormedCommGroup [NormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedCommGroup.toSeminormedGroup [SeminormedCommGroup E] :
SeminormedGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) NormedCommGroup.toNormedGroup [NormedCommGroup E] : NormedGroup E :=
{ ‹NormedCommGroup E› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedGroup` from a `SeminormedGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This
avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedGroup`
instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedGroup` instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddGroup` from a `SeminormedAddGroup`
satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace`
level when declaring a `NormedAddGroup` instance as a special case of a more general
`SeminormedAddGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedGroup E where
dist_eq := ‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq
toMetricSpace :=
{ eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun hxy =>
div_eq_one.1 <| h _ <| (‹SeminormedGroup E›.dist_eq _ _).symm.trans hxy }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a `NormedCommGroup` from a `SeminormedCommGroup` satisfying
`∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1`. This avoids having to go back to the `(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when
declaring a `NormedCommGroup` instance as a special case of a more general `SeminormedCommGroup`
instance. -/
@[to_additive "Construct a `NormedAddCommGroup` from a
`SeminormedAddCommGroup` satisfying `∀ x, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 0`. This avoids having to go back to the
`(Pseudo)MetricSpace` level when declaring a `NormedAddCommGroup` instance as a special case
of a more general `SeminormedAddCommGroup` instance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofSeparation [SeminormedCommGroup E] (h : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = 0 → x = 1) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ ‹SeminormedCommGroup E›, NormedGroup.ofSeparation h with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedGroup E where
dist_eq x y := by
rw [h₁]; apply le_antisymm
· simpa only [div_mul_cancel, one_mul] using h₂ (x / y) 1 y
· simpa only [div_eq_mul_inv, ← mul_inv_cancel y] using h₂ _ _ _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev SeminormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [PseudoMetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant distance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant distance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [Group E] [MetricSpace E] (h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1)
(h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) : NormedGroup E :=
{ SeminormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := eq_of_dist_eq_zero }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist x y ≤ dist (x * z) (y * z)) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a multiplication-invariant pseudodistance. -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a translation-invariant pseudodistance."]
abbrev NormedCommGroup.ofMulDist' [Norm E] [CommGroup E] [MetricSpace E]
(h₁ : ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ = dist x 1) (h₂ : ∀ x y z : E, dist (x * z) (y * z) ≤ dist x y) :
NormedCommGroup E :=
{ NormedGroup.ofMulDist' h₁ h₂ with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) : SeminormedGroup E where
dist x y := f (x / y)
norm := f
dist_eq _ _ := rfl
dist_self x := by simp only [div_self', map_one_eq_zero]
dist_triangle := le_map_div_add_map_div f
dist_comm := map_div_rev f
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance and the
pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this instance
creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing
`UniformSpace` instance on `E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a seminormed group from a seminorm, i.e., registering the pseudodistance
and the pseudometric space structure from the seminorm properties. Note that in most cases this
instance creates bad definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly
existing `UniformSpace` instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupSeminorm.toSeminormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupSeminorm E) :
SeminormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toSeminormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedGroup [Group E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedGroup E :=
{ f.toGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedGroup with
eq_of_dist_eq_zero := fun h => div_eq_one.1 <| eq_one_of_map_eq_zero f h }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric space
structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad definitional
equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace` instance on
`E`). -/
@[to_additive
"Construct a normed group from a norm, i.e., registering the distance and the metric
space structure from the norm properties. Note that in most cases this instance creates bad
definitional equalities (e.g., it does not take into account a possibly existing `UniformSpace`
instance on `E`)."]
abbrev GroupNorm.toNormedCommGroup [CommGroup E] (f : GroupNorm E) : NormedCommGroup E :=
{ f.toNormedGroup with
mul_comm := mul_comm }
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] [SeminormedGroup F] [SeminormedGroup G] {s : Set E}
{a a₁ a₂ b c : E} {r r₁ r₂ : ℝ}
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖a / b‖ :=
SeminormedGroup.dist_eq _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_eq_norm_div' (a b : E) : dist a b = ‖b / a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_eq_norm_div]
alias dist_eq_norm := dist_eq_norm_sub
alias dist_eq_norm' := dist_eq_norm_sub'
@[to_additive of_forall_le_norm]
lemma DiscreteTopology.of_forall_le_norm' (hpos : 0 < r) (hr : ∀ x : E, x ≠ 1 → r ≤ ‖x‖) :
DiscreteTopology E :=
.of_forall_le_dist hpos fun x y hne ↦ by
simp only [dist_eq_norm_div]
exact hr _ (div_ne_one.2 hne)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem dist_one_right (a : E) : dist a 1 = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_eq_norm_div, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem inseparable_one_iff_norm {a : E} : Inseparable a 1 ↔ ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Metric.inseparable_iff, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
lemma dist_one_left (a : E) : dist 1 a = ‖a‖ := by rw [dist_comm, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma dist_one : dist (1 : E) = norm := funext dist_one_left
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_rev (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ = ‖b / a‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_comm a b
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_neg]
theorem norm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ = ‖a‖ := by simpa using norm_div_rev 1 a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_abs_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rcases le_total 0 n with hn | hn <;> simp [hn, abs_of_nonneg, abs_of_nonpos]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_natAbs_smul]
theorem norm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖ = ‖a ^ n‖ := by
rw [← zpow_natCast, ← Int.abs_eq_natAbs, norm_zpow_abs]
@[to_additive norm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem norm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖ = ‖a‖ := by
rw [← norm_pow_natAbs, Int.isUnit_iff_natAbs_eq.mp hn, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem norm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖ = ‖a‖ :=
norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem dist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
dist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div, Set.apply_mulIndicator_symmDiff norm_inv']
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b⁻¹
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add_le_of_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
theorem norm_mul_le_of_le' (h₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (h₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ * a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_mul_le' a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add h₁ h₂
/-- **Triangle inequality** for the norm. -/
@[to_additive norm_add₃_le "**Triangle inequality** for the norm."]
lemma norm_mul₃_le' : ‖a * b * c‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ + ‖c‖ := norm_mul_le_of_le' (norm_mul_le' _ _) le_rfl
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_le_norm_div_add_norm_div (a b c : E) : ‖a / c‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ + ‖b / c‖ := by
simpa only [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a b c
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_nonneg]
theorem norm_nonneg' (a : E) : 0 ≤ ‖a‖ := by
rw [← dist_one_right]
exact dist_nonneg
attribute [bound] norm_nonneg
@[to_additive (attr := simp) abs_norm]
theorem abs_norm' (z : E) : |‖z‖| = ‖z‖ := abs_of_nonneg <| norm_nonneg' _
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_zero]
theorem norm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖ = 0 := by rw [← dist_one_right, dist_self]
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero : ‖a‖ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact norm_one'
@[to_additive (attr := nontriviality) norm_of_subsingleton]
theorem norm_of_subsingleton' [Subsingleton E] (a : E) : ‖a‖ = 0 := by
rw [Subsingleton.elim a 1, norm_one']
@[to_additive zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq]
theorem zero_lt_one_add_norm_sq' (x : E) : 0 < 1 + ‖x‖ ^ 2 := by
positivity
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using dist_triangle a 1 b
attribute [bound] norm_sub_le
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_le_of_le {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (H₁ : ‖a₁‖ ≤ r₁) (H₂ : ‖a₂‖ ≤ r₂) : ‖a₁ / a₂‖ ≤ r₁ + r₂ :=
(norm_div_le a₁ a₂).trans <| add_le_add H₁ H₂
@[to_additive dist_le_norm_add_norm]
theorem dist_le_norm_add_norm' (a b : E) : dist a b ≤ ‖a‖ + ‖b‖ := by
rw [dist_eq_norm_div]
apply norm_div_le
@[to_additive abs_norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem abs_norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : |‖a‖ - ‖b‖| ≤ ‖a / b‖ := by
simpa [dist_eq_norm_div] using abs_dist_sub_le a b 1
@[to_additive norm_sub_norm_le]
theorem norm_sub_norm_le' (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
(le_abs_self _).trans (abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b)
@[to_additive (attr := bound)]
theorem norm_sub_le_norm_mul (a b : E) : ‖a‖ - ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a * b‖ := by
simpa using norm_mul_le' (a * b) (b⁻¹)
@[to_additive dist_norm_norm_le]
theorem dist_norm_norm_le' (a b : E) : dist ‖a‖ ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a / b‖ :=
abs_norm_sub_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖v‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [add_comm]
refine (norm_mul_le' _ _).trans_eq' ?_
rw [div_mul_cancel]
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_norm_div (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u‖ + ‖u / v‖ := by
rw [norm_div_rev]
exact norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' v u
alias norm_le_insert' := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub'
alias norm_le_insert := norm_le_norm_add_norm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add (u v : E) : ‖u‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ :=
calc
‖u‖ = ‖u * v / v‖ := by rw [mul_div_cancel_right]
_ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖v‖ := norm_div_le _ _
/-- An analogue of `norm_le_mul_norm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `norm_le_add_norm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem norm_le_mul_norm_add' (u v : E) : ‖v‖ ≤ ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ :=
calc
‖v‖ = ‖u⁻¹ * (u * v)‖ := by rw [← mul_assoc, inv_mul_cancel, one_mul]
_ ≤ ‖u⁻¹‖ + ‖u * v‖ := norm_mul_le' u⁻¹ (u * v)
_ = ‖u * v‖ + ‖u‖ := by rw [norm_inv', add_comm]
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add' x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_mul_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x * y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_mul_le' x y
· simpa [h] using norm_le_mul_norm_add x y
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖y‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h, norm_div_rev x y] using norm_sub_norm_le' y x
@[to_additive]
lemma norm_div_eq_norm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖ = 0) : ‖x / y‖ = ‖x‖ := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· simpa [h] using norm_div_le x y
· simpa [h] using norm_sub_norm_le' x y
@[to_additive ball_eq]
theorem ball_eq' (y : E) (ε : ℝ) : ball y ε = { x | ‖x / y‖ < ε } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_eq (r : ℝ) : ball (1 : E) r = { x | ‖x‖ < r } :=
Set.ext fun a => by simp
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm]
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm'' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive mem_ball_iff_norm']
theorem mem_ball_iff_norm''' : b ∈ ball a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_ball_one_iff : a ∈ ball (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ < r := by rw [mem_ball, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm]
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm'' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_closedBall_one_iff : a ∈ closedBall (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall, dist_one_right]
@[to_additive mem_closedBall_iff_norm']
theorem mem_closedBall_iff_norm''' : b ∈ closedBall a r ↔ ‖a / b‖ ≤ r := by
rw [mem_closedBall', dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive norm_le_of_mem_closedBall]
theorem norm_le_of_mem_closedBall' (h : b ∈ closedBall a r) : ‖b‖ ≤ ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans <| add_le_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le]
theorem norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le' : dist a b ≤ r → ‖a‖ ≤ ‖b‖ + r :=
norm_le_of_mem_closedBall'
@[to_additive norm_lt_of_mem_ball]
theorem norm_lt_of_mem_ball' (h : b ∈ ball a r) : ‖b‖ < ‖a‖ + r :=
(norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _).trans_lt <| add_lt_add_left (by rwa [← dist_eq_norm_div]) _
@[to_additive]
theorem norm_div_sub_norm_div_le_norm_div (u v w : E) : ‖u / w‖ - ‖v / w‖ ≤ ‖u / v‖ := by
simpa only [div_div_div_cancel_right] using norm_sub_norm_le' (u / w) (v / w)
@[to_additive (attr := simp 1001) mem_sphere_iff_norm]
-- Porting note: increase priority so the left-hand side doesn't reduce
theorem mem_sphere_iff_norm' : b ∈ sphere a r ↔ ‖b / a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive] -- `simp` can prove this
theorem mem_sphere_one_iff_norm : a ∈ sphere (1 : E) r ↔ ‖a‖ = r := by simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_eq_of_mem_sphere]
theorem norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : ‖(x : E)‖ = r :=
mem_sphere_one_iff_norm.mp x.2
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_sphere (hr : r ≠ 0) (x : sphere (1 : E) r) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_norm_ne_zero <| by rwa [norm_eq_of_mem_sphere' x]
@[to_additive ne_zero_of_mem_unit_sphere]
theorem ne_one_of_mem_unit_sphere (x : sphere (1 : E) 1) : (x : E) ≠ 1 :=
ne_one_of_mem_sphere one_ne_zero _
variable (E)
/-- The norm of a seminormed group as a group seminorm. -/
@[to_additive "The norm of a seminormed group as an additive group seminorm."]
def normGroupSeminorm : GroupSeminorm E :=
⟨norm, norm_one', norm_mul_le', norm_inv'⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem coe_normGroupSeminorm : ⇑(normGroupSeminorm E) = norm :=
rfl
variable {E}
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_one {f : α → E} {l : Filter α} :
Tendsto f l (𝓝 1) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∀ᶠ x in l, ‖f x‖ < ε :=
Metric.tendsto_nhds.trans <| by simp only [dist_one_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.tendsto_nhds_nhds {f : E → F} {x : E} {y : F} :
Tendsto f (𝓝 x) (𝓝 y) ↔ ∀ ε > 0, ∃ δ > 0, ∀ x', ‖x' / x‖ < δ → ‖f x' / y‖ < ε := by
simp_rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds_nhds, dist_eq_norm_div]
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (x : E) :
(𝓝 x).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y / x‖ < ε } := by
simp_rw [← ball_eq']
exact Metric.nhds_basis_ball
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.nhds_one_basis_norm_lt :
(𝓝 (1 : E)).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { y | ‖y‖ < ε } := by
convert NormedCommGroup.nhds_basis_norm_lt (1 : E)
simp
@[to_additive]
theorem NormedCommGroup.uniformity_basis_dist :
(𝓤 E).HasBasis (fun ε : ℝ => 0 < ε) fun ε => { p : E × E | ‖p.fst / p.snd‖ < ε } := by
convert Metric.uniformity_basis_dist (α := E) using 1
simp [dist_eq_norm_div]
open Finset
variable [FunLike 𝓕 E F]
section NNNorm
-- See note [lower instance priority]
@[to_additive]
instance (priority := 100) SeminormedGroup.toNNNorm : NNNorm E :=
⟨fun a => ⟨‖a‖, norm_nonneg' a⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp, norm_cast) coe_nnnorm]
theorem coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ) = ‖a‖ := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) coe_comp_nnnorm]
theorem coe_comp_nnnorm' : (toReal : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) ∘ (nnnorm : E → ℝ≥0) = norm :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp) norm_toNNReal]
theorem norm_toNNReal' : ‖a‖.toNNReal = ‖a‖₊ :=
@Real.toNNReal_coe ‖a‖₊
@[to_additive (attr := simp) toReal_enorm]
lemma toReal_enorm' (x : E) : ‖x‖ₑ.toReal = ‖x‖ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) ofReal_norm]
lemma ofReal_norm' (x : E) : .ofReal ‖x‖ = ‖x‖ₑ := by
simp [enorm, ENNReal.ofReal, Real.toNNReal, nnnorm]
@[to_additive enorm_eq_iff_norm_eq]
theorem enorm'_eq_iff_norm_eq {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ = ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by congr⟩
exact (Real.toNNReal_eq_toNNReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _) (norm_nonneg' _)).mp (ENNReal.coe_inj.mp h)
@[to_additive enorm_le_iff_norm_le]
theorem enorm'_le_iff_norm_le {x : E} {y : F} : ‖x‖ₑ ≤ ‖y‖ₑ ↔ ‖x‖ ≤ ‖y‖ := by
simp only [← ofReal_norm']
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ by gcongr⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff (norm_nonneg' _)] at h
exact h
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_eq_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : nndist a b = ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_eq_norm_div _ _
alias nndist_eq_nnnorm := nndist_eq_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_right (a : E) : nndist a 1 = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma edist_one_right (a : E) : edist a 1 = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [edist_nndist, nndist_one_right, enorm]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_zero]
theorem nnnorm_one' : ‖(1 : E)‖₊ = 0 := NNReal.eq norm_one'
@[to_additive]
theorem ne_one_of_nnnorm_ne_zero {a : E} : ‖a‖₊ ≠ 0 → a ≠ 1 :=
mt <| by
rintro rfl
exact nnnorm_one'
@[to_additive nnnorm_add_le]
theorem nnnorm_mul_le' (a b : E) : ‖a * b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_mul_le' a b
@[to_additive norm_nsmul_le]
lemma norm_pow_le_mul_norm : ∀ {n : ℕ}, ‖a ^ n‖ ≤ n * ‖a‖
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by simpa [pow_succ, add_mul] using norm_mul_le_of_le' norm_pow_le_mul_norm le_rfl
@[to_additive nnnorm_nsmul_le]
lemma nnnorm_pow_le_mul_norm {n : ℕ} : ‖a ^ n‖₊ ≤ n * ‖a‖₊ := by
simpa only [← NNReal.coe_le_coe, NNReal.coe_mul, NNReal.coe_natCast] using norm_pow_le_mul_norm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_neg]
theorem nnnorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_inv' a
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_abs_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_abs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ |n|‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_abs a n
@[to_additive (attr := simp) nnnorm_natAbs_smul]
theorem nnnorm_pow_natAbs (a : E) (n : ℤ) : ‖a ^ n.natAbs‖₊ = ‖a ^ n‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_pow_natAbs a n
@[to_additive nnnorm_isUnit_zsmul]
theorem nnnorm_zpow_isUnit (a : E) {n : ℤ} (hn : IsUnit n) : ‖a ^ n‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_zpow_isUnit a hn
@[simp]
theorem nnnorm_units_zsmul {E : Type*} [SeminormedAddGroup E] (n : ℤˣ) (a : E) : ‖n • a‖₊ = ‖a‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_isUnit_zsmul a n.isUnit
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem nndist_one_left (a : E) : nndist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by simp [nndist_eq_nnnorm_div]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem edist_one_left (a : E) : edist 1 a = ‖a‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_one_left]
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem nndist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
nndist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| dist_mulIndicator s t f x
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_div_le (a b : E) : ‖a / b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| norm_div_le _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma enorm_div_le : ‖a / b‖ₑ ≤ ‖a‖ₑ + ‖b‖ₑ := by
simpa [enorm, ← ENNReal.coe_add] using nnnorm_div_le a b
@[to_additive nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le]
theorem nndist_nnnorm_nnnorm_le' (a b : E) : nndist ‖a‖₊ ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a / b‖₊ :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.1 <| dist_norm_norm_le' a b
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div _ _
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_div' (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖b‖₊ + ‖a / b‖₊ :=
norm_le_norm_add_norm_div' _ _
alias nnnorm_le_insert' := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub'
alias nnnorm_le_insert := nnnorm_le_nnnorm_add_nnnorm_sub
@[to_additive]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add (a b : E) : ‖a‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖b‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add _ _
/-- An analogue of `nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add` for the multiplication from the left. -/
@[to_additive "An analogue of `nnnorm_le_add_nnnorm_add` for the addition from the left."]
theorem nnnorm_le_mul_nnnorm_add' (a b : E) : ‖b‖₊ ≤ ‖a * b‖₊ + ‖a‖₊ :=
norm_le_mul_norm_add' _ _
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_mul_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x * y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_mul_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_right {x : E} (y : E) (h : ‖x‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖y‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_right _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
@[to_additive]
lemma nnnorm_div_eq_nnnorm_left (x : E) {y : E} (h : ‖y‖₊ = 0) : ‖x / y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ :=
NNReal.eq <| norm_div_eq_norm_left _ <| congr_arg NNReal.toReal h
/-- The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and then as a `Real` is equal to the norm. -/
@[to_additive toReal_coe_nnnorm "The non negative norm seen as an `ENNReal` and
then as a `Real` is equal to the norm."]
theorem toReal_coe_nnnorm' (a : E) : (‖a‖₊ : ℝ≥0∞).toReal = ‖a‖ := rfl
open scoped symmDiff in
@[to_additive]
theorem edist_mulIndicator (s t : Set α) (f : α → E) (x : α) :
edist (s.mulIndicator f x) (t.mulIndicator f x) = ‖(s ∆ t).mulIndicator f x‖₊ := by
rw [edist_nndist, nndist_mulIndicator]
end NNNorm
section ENorm
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_zero]
lemma enorm_one' {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E] : ‖(1 : E)‖ₑ = 0 := by
rw [ENormedMonoid.enorm_eq_zero]
@[to_additive exists_enorm_lt]
lemma exists_enorm_lt' (E : Type*) [TopologicalSpace E] [ENormedMonoid E]
[hbot : NeBot (𝓝[≠] (1 : E))] {c : ℝ≥0∞} (hc : c ≠ 0) : ∃ x ≠ (1 : E), ‖x‖ₑ < c :=
frequently_iff_neBot.mpr hbot |>.and_eventually
(ContinuousENorm.continuous_enorm.tendsto' 1 0 (by simp) |>.eventually_lt_const hc.bot_lt)
|>.exists
@[to_additive (attr := simp) enorm_neg]
lemma enorm_inv' (a : E) : ‖a⁻¹‖ₑ = ‖a‖ₑ := by simp [enorm]
@[to_additive ofReal_norm_eq_enorm]
lemma ofReal_norm_eq_enorm' (a : E) : .ofReal ‖a‖ = ‖a‖ₑ := ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-17")] alias ofReal_norm_eq_coe_nnnorm' := ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'
instance : ENorm ℝ≥0∞ where
enorm x := x
@[simp] lemma enorm_eq_self (x : ℝ≥0∞) : ‖x‖ₑ = x := rfl
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Basic.lean | 877 | 878 | theorem edist_eq_enorm_div (a b : E) : edist a b = ‖a / b‖ₑ := by | rw [edist_dist, dist_eq_norm_div, ofReal_norm_eq_enorm'] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Calle Sönne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Algebra.CharZero.Quotient
import Mathlib.Topology.Instances.Sign
/-!
# The type of angles
In this file we define `Real.Angle` to be the quotient group `ℝ/2πℤ` and prove a few simple lemmas
about trigonometric functions and angles.
-/
open Real
noncomputable section
namespace Real
/-- The type of angles -/
def Angle : Type :=
AddCircle (2 * π)
-- The `NormedAddCommGroup, Inhabited` instances should be constructed by a deriving handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
namespace Angle
instance : NormedAddCommGroup Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (NormedAddCommGroup (AddCircle (2 * π)))
instance : Inhabited Angle :=
inferInstanceAs (Inhabited (AddCircle (2 * π)))
/-- The canonical map from `ℝ` to the quotient `Angle`. -/
@[coe]
protected def coe (r : ℝ) : Angle := QuotientAddGroup.mk r
instance : Coe ℝ Angle := ⟨Angle.coe⟩
instance : CircularOrder Real.Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.circularOrder (hp' := ⟨by norm_num [pi_pos]⟩)
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_coe : Continuous ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
continuous_quotient_mk'
/-- Coercion `ℝ → Angle` as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : ℝ →+ Angle :=
QuotientAddGroup.mk' _
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom : ℝ → Angle) = ((↑) : ℝ → Angle) :=
rfl
/-- An induction principle to deduce results for `Angle` from those for `ℝ`, used with
`induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {p : Angle → Prop} (θ : Angle) (h : ∀ x : ℝ, p x) : p θ :=
Quotient.inductionOn' θ h
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_add (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x + y : ℝ) = (↑x + ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg (x : ℝ) : ↑(-x : ℝ) = -(↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_sub (x y : ℝ) : ↑(x - y : ℝ) = (↑x - ↑y : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_nsmul (n : ℕ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(n • x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_zsmul (z : ℤ) (x : ℝ) : ↑(z • x : ℝ) = z • (↑x : Angle) :=
rfl
theorem coe_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : (x : Angle) = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, n • (2 * π) = x :=
AddCircle.coe_eq_zero_iff (2 * π)
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem natCast_mul_eq_nsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [nsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_nsmul x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem intCast_mul_eq_zsmul (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : ↑((n : ℝ) * x : ℝ) = n • (↑x : Angle) := by
simpa only [zsmul_eq_mul] using coeHom.map_zsmul x n
theorem angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub {ψ θ : ℝ} : (θ : Angle) = ψ ↔ ∃ k : ℤ, θ - ψ = 2 * π * k := by
simp only [QuotientAddGroup.eq, AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
rw [Angle.coe, Angle.coe, QuotientAddGroup.eq]
simp only [AddSubgroup.zmultiples_eq_closure,
AddSubgroup.mem_closure_singleton, zsmul_eq_mul', (sub_eq_neg_add _ _).symm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem coe_two_pi : ↑(2 * π : ℝ) = (0 : Angle) :=
angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub.2 ⟨1, by rw [sub_zero, Int.cast_one, mul_one]⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_coe_pi : -(π : Angle) = π := by
rw [← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
use -1
simp [two_mul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_nsmul, two_nsmul, add_halves]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_div_two (θ : ℝ) : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(θ / 2) : Angle) = θ := by
rw [← coe_zsmul, two_zsmul, add_halves]
theorem two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℕ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_nsmul_coe_div_two, coe_neg, neg_coe_pi]
theorem two_zsmul_neg_pi_div_two : (2 : ℤ) • (↑(-π / 2) : Angle) = π := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_neg_pi_div_two]
theorem sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi (θ : Angle) : θ - π = θ + π := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neg_coe_pi]
@[simp]
theorem two_nsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℕ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← natCast_mul_eq_nsmul]
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_coe_pi : (2 : ℤ) • (π : Angle) = 0 := by simp [← intCast_mul_eq_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi_add_coe_pi : (π : Real.Angle) + π = 0 := by rw [← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_coe_pi]
theorem zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {z : ℤ} (hz : z ≠ 0) :
z • ψ = z • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin z.natAbs, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / z : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_zsmul_eq_zsmul_iff hz
theorem nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} {n : ℕ} (hz : n ≠ 0) :
n • ψ = n • θ ↔ ∃ k : Fin n, ψ = θ + (k : ℕ) • (2 * π / n : ℝ) :=
QuotientAddGroup.zmultiples_nsmul_eq_nsmul_iff hz
theorem two_zsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • ψ = (2 : ℤ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
have : Int.natAbs 2 = 2 := rfl
rw [zsmul_eq_iff two_ne_zero, this, Fin.exists_fin_two, Fin.val_zero,
Fin.val_one, zero_smul, add_zero, one_smul, Int.cast_two,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ (_ : ℝ) two_ne_zero]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_iff {ψ θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • ψ = (2 : ℕ) • θ ↔ ψ = θ ∨ ψ = θ + ↑π := by
simp_rw [← natCast_zsmul, Nat.cast_ofNat, two_zsmul_eq_iff]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
convert two_nsmul_eq_iff <;> simp
theorem two_nsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
simp_rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem two_zsmul_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← two_zsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem eq_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ = -θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
rw [← add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_zero_iff]
theorem ne_neg_self_iff {θ : Angle} : θ ≠ -θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← eq_neg_self_iff.not]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ = θ ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by rw [eq_comm, eq_neg_self_iff]
theorem neg_ne_self_iff {θ : Angle} : -θ ≠ θ ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← neg_eq_self_iff.not]
theorem two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℕ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
have h : (π : Angle) = ((2 : ℕ) • (π / 2 : ℝ):) := by rw [two_nsmul, add_halves]
nth_rw 1 [h]
rw [coe_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_iff]
-- Porting note: `congr` didn't simplify the goal of iff of `Or`s
convert Iff.rfl
rw [add_comm, ← coe_add, ← sub_eq_zero, ← coe_sub, neg_div, ← neg_sub, sub_neg_eq_add, add_assoc,
add_halves, ← two_mul, coe_neg, coe_two_pi, neg_zero]
theorem two_zsmul_eq_pi_iff {θ : Angle} : (2 : ℤ) • θ = π ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [two_zsmul, ← two_nsmul, two_nsmul_eq_pi_iff]
theorem cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = cos ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) = -ψ := by
constructor
· intro Hcos
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, mul_eq_zero, mul_eq_zero, neg_eq_zero,
eq_false (two_ne_zero' ℝ), false_or, sin_eq_zero_iff, sin_eq_zero_iff] at Hcos
rcases Hcos with (⟨n, hn⟩ | ⟨n, hn⟩)
· right
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, sub_add_cancel, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul,
mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero]
· left
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq (two_ne_zero' ℝ), eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hn
rw [← hn, coe_add, mul_assoc, intCast_mul_eq_zsmul, mul_comm, coe_two_pi, zsmul_zero,
zero_add]
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← coe_neg, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero]
rw [← sub_eq_zero, cos_sub_cos, ← sub_neg_eq_add, H, mul_assoc 2 π k,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero,
zero_mul]
theorem sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = sin ψ ↔ (θ : Angle) = ψ ∨ (θ : Angle) + ψ = π := by
constructor
· intro Hsin
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_two_sub] at Hsin
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hsin with h | h
· left
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub] at h
exact sub_right_inj.1 h
right
rw [coe_sub, coe_sub, eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, add_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, ← coe_add,
add_halves, sub_sub, sub_eq_zero] at h
exact h.symm
· rw [angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub, ← eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← coe_sub, angle_eq_iff_two_pi_dvd_sub]
rintro (⟨k, H⟩ | ⟨k, H⟩)
· rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H, mul_assoc 2 π k, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ),
mul_comm π _, sin_int_mul_pi, mul_zero, zero_mul]
have H' : θ + ψ = 2 * k * π + π := by
rwa [← sub_add, sub_add_eq_add_sub, sub_eq_iff_eq_add, mul_assoc, mul_comm π _, ←
mul_assoc] at H
rw [← sub_eq_zero, sin_sub_sin, H', add_div, mul_assoc 2 _ π,
mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), cos_add_pi_div_two, sin_int_mul_pi, neg_zero,
mul_zero]
theorem cos_sin_inj {θ ψ : ℝ} (Hcos : cos θ = cos ψ) (Hsin : sin θ = sin ψ) : (θ : Angle) = ψ := by
rcases cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg.mp Hcos with hc | hc; · exact hc
rcases sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi.mp Hsin with hs | hs; · exact hs
rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, hs] at hc
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, n • _ = _ := QuotientAddGroup.leftRel_apply.mp (Quotient.exact' hc)
rw [← neg_one_mul, add_zero, ← sub_eq_zero, zsmul_eq_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← sub_mul, mul_eq_zero,
eq_false (ne_of_gt pi_pos), or_false, sub_neg_eq_add, ← Int.cast_zero, ← Int.cast_one,
← Int.cast_ofNat, ← Int.cast_mul, ← Int.cast_add, Int.cast_inj] at hn
have : (n * 2 + 1) % (2 : ℤ) = 0 % (2 : ℤ) := congr_arg (· % (2 : ℤ)) hn
rw [add_comm, Int.add_mul_emod_self_right] at this
exact absurd this one_ne_zero
/-- The sine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def sin (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
sin_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_coe (x : ℝ) : sin (x : Angle) = Real.sin x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Real.continuous_sin.quotient_liftOn' _
/-- The cosine of a `Real.Angle`. -/
def cos (θ : Angle) : ℝ :=
cos_periodic.lift θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_coe (x : ℝ) : cos (x : Angle) = Real.cos x :=
rfl
@[continuity]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Real.continuous_cos.quotient_liftOn' _
theorem cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
cos θ = Real.cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg {θ ψ : Angle} : cos θ = cos ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ = -ψ := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg
theorem sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ : Angle} {ψ : ℝ} :
sin θ = Real.sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_iff_coe_eq_or_add_eq_pi
theorem sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi {θ ψ : Angle} : sin θ = sin ψ ↔ θ = ψ ∨ θ + ψ = π := by
induction ψ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact sin_eq_real_sin_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi
@[simp]
theorem sin_zero : sin (0 : Angle) = 0 := by rw [← coe_zero, sin_coe, Real.sin_zero]
theorem sin_coe_pi : sin (π : Angle) = 0 := by rw [sin_coe, Real.sin_pi]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ = 0 ↔ θ = 0 ∨ θ = π := by
nth_rw 1 [← sin_zero]
rw [sin_eq_iff_eq_or_add_eq_pi]
simp
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : sin θ ≠ 0 ↔ θ ≠ 0 ∧ θ ≠ π := by
rw [← not_or, ← sin_eq_zero_iff]
@[simp]
theorem sin_neg (θ : Angle) : sin (-θ) = -sin θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_neg _
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - π) = -sin θ :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_zero : cos (0 : Angle) = 1 := by rw [← coe_zero, cos_coe, Real.cos_zero]
theorem cos_coe_pi : cos (π : Angle) = -1 := by rw [cos_coe, Real.cos_pi]
@[simp]
theorem cos_neg (θ : Angle) : cos (-θ) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_neg _
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos (π : Angle) := by
intro θ
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_antiperiodic _
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ + π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic θ
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (θ : Angle) : cos (θ - π) = -cos θ :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq θ
theorem cos_eq_zero_iff {θ : Angle} : cos θ = 0 ↔ θ = (π / 2 : ℝ) ∨ θ = (-π / 2 : ℝ) := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two, ← cos_coe, cos_eq_iff_eq_or_eq_neg, ← coe_neg, ← neg_div]
theorem sin_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : sin (θ₁ + θ₂) = sin θ₁ * cos θ₂ + cos θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add _ _
theorem cos_add (θ₁ θ₂ : Real.Angle) : cos (θ₁ + θ₂) = cos θ₁ * cos θ₂ - sin θ₁ * sin θ₂ := by
induction θ₂ using Real.Angle.induction_on
induction θ₁ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem cos_sq_add_sin_sq (θ : Real.Angle) : cos θ ^ 2 + sin θ ^ 2 = 1 := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.cos_sq_add_sin_sq _
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ + ↑(π / 2)) = cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_add_pi_div_two _
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (θ : Angle) : sin (θ - ↑(π / 2)) = -cos θ := by
induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_sub_pi_div_two _
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Angle.lean | 376 | 378 | theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (θ : Angle) : sin (↑(π / 2) - θ) = cos θ := by | induction θ using Real.Angle.induction_on
exact Real.sin_pi_div_two_sub _ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2016 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
import Mathlib.Tactic.Basic
import Batteries.Logic
import Batteries.Tactic.Trans
import Batteries.Util.LibraryNote
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Notation
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Notation
/-!
# Basic logic properties
This file is one of the earliest imports in mathlib.
## Implementation notes
Theorems that require decidability hypotheses are in the namespace `Decidable`.
Classical versions are in the namespace `Classical`.
-/
open Function
section Miscellany
-- attribute [refl] HEq.refl -- FIXME This is still rejected after https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/857
attribute [trans] Iff.trans HEq.trans heq_of_eq_of_heq
attribute [simp] cast_heq
/-- An identity function with its main argument implicit. This will be printed as `hidden` even
if it is applied to a large term, so it can be used for elision,
as done in the `elide` and `unelide` tactics. -/
abbrev hidden {α : Sort*} {a : α} := a
variable {α : Sort*}
instance (priority := 10) decidableEq_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] : DecidableEq α :=
fun a b ↦ isTrue (Subsingleton.elim a b)
instance [Subsingleton α] (p : α → Prop) : Subsingleton (Subtype p) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, _⟩ ⟨y, _⟩ ↦ by cases Subsingleton.elim x y; rfl⟩
theorem congr_heq {α β γ : Sort _} {f : α → γ} {g : β → γ} {x : α} {y : β}
(h₁ : HEq f g) (h₂ : HEq x y) : f x = g y := by
cases h₂; cases h₁; rfl
theorem congr_arg_heq {β : α → Sort*} (f : ∀ a, β a) :
∀ {a₁ a₂ : α}, a₁ = a₂ → HEq (f a₁) (f a₂)
| _, _, rfl => HEq.rfl
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_left {b c : α} : (∀ {a}, a = b ↔ a = c) ↔ b = c :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [← h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
@[simp] theorem eq_iff_eq_cancel_right {a b : α} : (∀ {c}, a = c ↔ b = c) ↔ a = b :=
⟨fun h ↦ by rw [h], fun h a ↦ by rw [h]⟩
lemma ne_and_eq_iff_right {a b c : α} (h : b ≠ c) : a ≠ b ∧ a = c ↔ a = c :=
and_iff_right_of_imp (fun h2 => h2.symm ▸ h.symm)
/-- Wrapper for adding elementary propositions to the type class systems.
Warning: this can easily be abused. See the rest of this docstring for details.
Certain propositions should not be treated as a class globally,
but sometimes it is very convenient to be able to use the type class system
in specific circumstances.
For example, `ZMod p` is a field if and only if `p` is a prime number.
In order to be able to find this field instance automatically by type class search,
we have to turn `p.prime` into an instance implicit assumption.
On the other hand, making `Nat.prime` a class would require a major refactoring of the library,
and it is questionable whether making `Nat.prime` a class is desirable at all.
The compromise is to add the assumption `[Fact p.prime]` to `ZMod.field`.
In particular, this class is not intended for turning the type class system
into an automated theorem prover for first order logic. -/
class Fact (p : Prop) : Prop where
/-- `Fact.out` contains the unwrapped witness for the fact represented by the instance of
`Fact p`. -/
out : p
library_note "fact non-instances"/--
In most cases, we should not have global instances of `Fact`; typeclass search only reads the head
symbol and then tries any instances, which means that adding any such instance will cause slowdowns
everywhere. We instead make them as lemmata and make them local instances as required.
-/
theorem Fact.elim {p : Prop} (h : Fact p) : p := h.1
theorem fact_iff {p : Prop} : Fact p ↔ p := ⟨fun h ↦ h.1, fun h ↦ ⟨h⟩⟩
instance {p : Prop} [Decidable p] : Decidable (Fact p) :=
decidable_of_iff _ fact_iff.symm
/-- Swaps two pairs of arguments to a function. -/
abbrev Function.swap₂ {ι₁ ι₂ : Sort*} {κ₁ : ι₁ → Sort*} {κ₂ : ι₂ → Sort*}
{φ : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Sort*} (f : ∀ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂, φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂)
(i₂ j₂ i₁ j₁) : φ i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ := f i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂
end Miscellany
open Function
/-!
### Declarations about propositional connectives
-/
section Propositional
/-! ### Declarations about `implies` -/
alias Iff.imp := imp_congr
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.imp_iff_right_iff`. Deprecate?
theorem imp_iff_right_iff {a b : Prop} : (a → b ↔ b) ↔ a ∨ b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_right_iff
-- This is a duplicate of `Classical.and_or_imp`. Deprecate?
theorem and_or_imp {a b c : Prop} : a ∧ b ∨ (a → c) ↔ a → b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_or_imp
/-- Provide modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mt {a b : Prop} : (a → b) → ¬b → ¬a := mt
/-! ### Declarations about `not` -/
alias dec_em := Decidable.em
theorem dec_em' (p : Prop) [Decidable p] : ¬p ∨ p := (dec_em p).symm
alias em := Classical.em
theorem em' (p : Prop) : ¬p ∨ p := (em p).symm
theorem or_not {p : Prop} : p ∨ ¬p := em _
theorem Decidable.eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x = y ∨ x ≠ y :=
dec_em <| x = y
theorem Decidable.ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) [Decidable (x = y)] : x ≠ y ∨ x = y :=
dec_em' <| x = y
theorem eq_or_ne {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x = y ∨ x ≠ y := em <| x = y
theorem ne_or_eq {α : Sort*} (x y : α) : x ≠ y ∨ x = y := em' <| x = y
theorem by_contradiction {p : Prop} : (¬p → False) → p :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.byContradiction
theorem by_cases {p q : Prop} (hpq : p → q) (hnpq : ¬p → q) : q :=
open scoped Classical in if hp : p then hpq hp else hnpq hp
alias by_contra := by_contradiction
library_note "decidable namespace"/--
In most of mathlib, we use the law of excluded middle (LEM) and the axiom of choice (AC) freely.
The `Decidable` namespace contains versions of lemmas from the root namespace that explicitly
attempt to avoid the axiom of choice, usually by adding decidability assumptions on the inputs.
You can check if a lemma uses the axiom of choice by using `#print axioms foo` and seeing if
`Classical.choice` appears in the list.
-/
library_note "decidable arguments"/--
As mathlib is primarily classical,
if the type signature of a `def` or `lemma` does not require any `Decidable` instances to state,
it is preferable not to introduce any `Decidable` instances that are needed in the proof
as arguments, but rather to use the `classical` tactic as needed.
In the other direction, when `Decidable` instances do appear in the type signature,
it is better to use explicitly introduced ones rather than allowing Lean to automatically infer
classical ones, as these may cause instance mismatch errors later.
-/
export Classical (not_not)
attribute [simp] not_not
variable {a b : Prop}
theorem of_not_not {a : Prop} : ¬¬a → a := by_contra
theorem not_ne_iff {α : Sort*} {a b : α} : ¬a ≠ b ↔ a = b := not_not
theorem of_not_imp : ¬(a → b) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.of_not_imp
alias Not.decidable_imp_symm := Decidable.not_imp_symm
theorem Not.imp_symm : (¬a → b) → ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Not.decidable_imp_symm
theorem not_imp_comm : ¬a → b ↔ ¬b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_comm
@[simp] theorem not_imp_self : ¬a → a ↔ a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_self
theorem Imp.swap {a b : Sort*} {c : Prop} : a → b → c ↔ b → a → c :=
⟨fun h x y ↦ h y x, fun h x y ↦ h y x⟩
alias Iff.not := not_congr
theorem Iff.not_left (h : a ↔ ¬b) : ¬a ↔ b := h.not.trans not_not
theorem Iff.not_right (h : ¬a ↔ b) : a ↔ ¬b := not_not.symm.trans h.not
protected lemma Iff.ne {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c = d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not
lemma Iff.ne_left {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) → (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) :=
Iff.not_left
lemma Iff.ne_right {α β : Sort*} {a b : α} {c d : β} : (a ≠ b ↔ c = d) → (a = b ↔ c ≠ d) :=
Iff.not_right
/-! ### Declarations about `Xor'` -/
/-- `Xor' a b` is the exclusive-or of propositions. -/
def Xor' (a b : Prop) := (a ∧ ¬b) ∨ (b ∧ ¬a)
instance [Decidable a] [Decidable b] : Decidable (Xor' a b) := inferInstanceAs (Decidable (Or ..))
@[simp] theorem xor_true : Xor' True = Not := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_false : Xor' False = id := by ext; simp [Xor']
theorem xor_comm (a b : Prop) : Xor' a b = Xor' b a := by simp [Xor', and_comm, or_comm]
instance : Std.Commutative Xor' := ⟨xor_comm⟩
@[simp] theorem xor_self (a : Prop) : Xor' a a = False := by simp [Xor']
@[simp] theorem xor_not_left : Xor' (¬a) b ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
@[simp] theorem xor_not_right : Xor' a (¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := by by_cases a <;> simp [*]
theorem xor_not_not : Xor' (¬a) (¬b) ↔ Xor' a b := by simp [Xor', or_comm, and_comm]
protected theorem Xor'.or (h : Xor' a b) : a ∨ b := h.imp And.left And.left
/-! ### Declarations about `and` -/
alias Iff.and := and_congr
alias ⟨And.rotate, _⟩ := and_rotate
theorem and_symm_right {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : p ∧ a = b ↔ p ∧ b = a := by simp [eq_comm]
theorem and_symm_left {α : Sort*} (a b : α) (p : Prop) : a = b ∧ p ↔ b = a ∧ p := by simp [eq_comm]
/-! ### Declarations about `or` -/
alias Iff.or := or_congr
alias ⟨Or.rotate, _⟩ := or_rotate
theorem Or.elim3 {c d : Prop} (h : a ∨ b ∨ c) (ha : a → d) (hb : b → d) (hc : c → d) : d :=
Or.elim h ha fun h₂ ↦ Or.elim h₂ hb hc
theorem Or.imp3 {d e c f : Prop} (had : a → d) (hbe : b → e) (hcf : c → f) :
a ∨ b ∨ c → d ∨ e ∨ f :=
Or.imp had <| Or.imp hbe hcf
export Classical (or_iff_not_imp_left or_iff_not_imp_right)
theorem not_or_of_imp : (a → b) → ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_or_of_imp
-- See Note [decidable namespace]
protected theorem Decidable.or_not_of_imp [Decidable a] (h : a → b) : b ∨ ¬a :=
dite _ (Or.inl ∘ h) Or.inr
theorem or_not_of_imp : (a → b) → b ∨ ¬a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_not_of_imp
theorem imp_iff_not_or : a → b ↔ ¬a ∨ b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_not_or
theorem imp_iff_or_not {b a : Prop} : b → a ↔ a ∨ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_iff_or_not
theorem not_imp_not : ¬a → ¬b ↔ b → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_not
theorem imp_and_neg_imp_iff (p q : Prop) : (p → q) ∧ (¬p → q) ↔ q := by simp
/-- Provide the reverse of modus tollens (`mt`) as dot notation for implications. -/
protected theorem Function.mtr : (¬a → ¬b) → b → a := not_imp_not.mp
theorem or_congr_left' {c a b : Prop} (h : ¬c → (a ↔ b)) : a ∨ c ↔ b ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_left' h
theorem or_congr_right' {c : Prop} (h : ¬a → (b ↔ c)) : a ∨ b ↔ a ∨ c :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_congr_right' h
/-! ### Declarations about distributivity -/
/-! Declarations about `iff` -/
alias Iff.iff := iff_congr
-- @[simp] -- FIXME simp ignores proof rewrites
theorem iff_mpr_iff_true_intro {P : Prop} (h : P) : Iff.mpr (iff_true_intro h) True.intro = h := rfl
theorem imp_or {a b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or
theorem imp_or' {a : Sort*} {b c : Prop} : a → b ∨ c ↔ (a → b) ∨ (a → c) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.imp_or'
theorem not_imp : ¬(a → b) ↔ a ∧ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_imp_iff_and_not
theorem peirce (a b : Prop) : ((a → b) → a) → a := open scoped Classical in Decidable.peirce _ _
theorem not_iff_not : (¬a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_not
theorem not_iff_comm : (¬a ↔ b) ↔ (¬b ↔ a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff_comm
theorem not_iff : ¬(a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_iff
theorem iff_not_comm : (a ↔ ¬b) ↔ (b ↔ ¬a) := open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_not_comm
theorem iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ a ∧ b ∨ ¬a ∧ ¬b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_and_or_not_and_not
theorem iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not : (a ↔ b) ↔ (¬a ∨ b) ∧ (a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.iff_iff_not_or_and_or_not
theorem not_and_not_right : ¬(a ∧ ¬b) ↔ a → b :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_not_right
/-! ### De Morgan's laws -/
/-- One of **de Morgan's laws**: the negation of a conjunction is logically equivalent to the
disjunction of the negations. -/
theorem not_and_or : ¬(a ∧ b) ↔ ¬a ∨ ¬b := open scoped Classical in Decidable.not_and_iff_not_or_not
theorem or_iff_not_and_not : a ∨ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∧ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.or_iff_not_not_and_not
theorem and_iff_not_or_not : a ∧ b ↔ ¬(¬a ∨ ¬b) :=
open scoped Classical in Decidable.and_iff_not_not_or_not
@[simp] theorem not_xor (P Q : Prop) : ¬Xor' P Q ↔ (P ↔ Q) := by
simp only [not_and, Xor', not_or, not_not, ← iff_iff_implies_and_implies]
theorem xor_iff_not_iff (P Q : Prop) : Xor' P Q ↔ ¬ (P ↔ Q) := (not_xor P Q).not_right
theorem xor_iff_iff_not : Xor' a b ↔ (a ↔ ¬b) := by simp only [← @xor_not_right a, not_not]
| Mathlib/Logic/Basic.lean | 343 | 343 | theorem xor_iff_not_iff' : Xor' a b ↔ (¬a ↔ b) := by | simp only [← @xor_not_left _ b, not_not] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.Basic
/-!
# Set neighborhoods of intervals
In this file we prove basic theorems about `𝓝ˢ s`,
where `s` is one of the intervals
`Set.Ici`, `Set.Iic`, `Set.Ioi`, `Set.Iio`, `Set.Ico`, `Set.Ioc`, `Set.Ioo`, and `Set.Icc`.
First, we prove lemmas in terms of filter equalities.
Then we prove lemmas about `s ∈ 𝓝ˢ t`, where both `s` and `t` are intervals.
Finally, we prove a few lemmas about filter bases of `𝓝ˢ (Iic a)` and `𝓝ˢ (Ici a)`.
-/
open Set Filter OrderDual
open scoped Topology
section OrderClosedTopology
variable {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] [TopologicalSpace α] [OrderClosedTopology α] {a b c d : α}
/-!
# Formulae for `𝓝ˢ` of intervals
-/
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Ioi : 𝓝ˢ (Ioi a) = 𝓟 (Ioi a) := isOpen_Ioi.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Iio : 𝓝ˢ (Iio a) = 𝓟 (Iio a) := isOpen_Iio.nhdsSet_eq
@[simp] theorem nhdsSet_Ioo : 𝓝ˢ (Ioo a b) = 𝓟 (Ioo a b) := isOpen_Ioo.nhdsSet_eq
| Mathlib/Topology/Order/NhdsSet.lean | 36 | 37 | theorem nhdsSet_Ici : 𝓝ˢ (Ici a) = 𝓝 a ⊔ 𝓟 (Ioi a) := by | rw [← Ioi_insert, nhdsSet_insert, nhdsSet_Ioi] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Vector.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.OfFn
import Mathlib.Data.List.Scan
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.List.Basic
/-!
# Additional theorems and definitions about the `Vector` type
This file introduces the infix notation `::ᵥ` for `Vector.cons`.
-/
universe u
variable {α β γ σ φ : Type*} {m n : ℕ}
namespace List.Vector
@[inherit_doc]
infixr:67 " ::ᵥ " => Vector.cons
attribute [simp] head_cons tail_cons
instance [Inhabited α] : Inhabited (Vector α n) :=
⟨ofFn default⟩
theorem toList_injective : Function.Injective (@toList α n) :=
Subtype.val_injective
/-- Two `v w : Vector α n` are equal iff they are equal at every single index. -/
@[ext]
theorem ext : ∀ {v w : Vector α n} (_ : ∀ m : Fin n, Vector.get v m = Vector.get w m), v = w
| ⟨v, hv⟩, ⟨w, hw⟩, h =>
Subtype.eq (List.ext_get (by rw [hv, hw]) fun m hm _ => h ⟨m, hv ▸ hm⟩)
/-- The empty `Vector` is a `Subsingleton`. -/
instance zero_subsingleton : Subsingleton (Vector α 0) :=
⟨fun _ _ => Vector.ext fun m => Fin.elim0 m⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_val (a : α) : ∀ v : Vector α n, (a ::ᵥ v).val = a :: v.val
| ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
theorem eq_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v = a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head = a ∧ v.tail = v' :=
⟨fun h => h.symm ▸ ⟨head_cons a v', tail_cons a v'⟩, fun h =>
_root_.trans (cons_head_tail v).symm (by rw [h.1, h.2])⟩
theorem ne_cons_iff (a : α) (v : Vector α n.succ) (v' : Vector α n) :
v ≠ a ::ᵥ v' ↔ v.head ≠ a ∨ v.tail ≠ v' := by rw [Ne, eq_cons_iff a v v', not_and_or]
theorem exists_eq_cons (v : Vector α n.succ) : ∃ (a : α) (as : Vector α n), v = a ::ᵥ as :=
⟨v.head, v.tail, (eq_cons_iff v.head v v.tail).2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toList_ofFn : ∀ {n} (f : Fin n → α), toList (ofFn f) = List.ofFn f
| 0, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_zero, toList, nil]
| n + 1, f => by rw [ofFn, List.ofFn_succ, toList_cons, toList_ofFn]
@[simp]
theorem mk_toList : ∀ (v : Vector α n) (h), (⟨toList v, h⟩ : Vector α n) = v
| ⟨_, _⟩, _ => rfl
@[simp] theorem length_val (v : Vector α n) : v.val.length = n := v.2
@[simp]
theorem pmap_cons {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ (cons a v).toList, p x) :
(cons a v).pmap f hp = cons (f a (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.1))
(v.pmap f (by
simp only [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, toList_cons, List.mem_cons, forall_eq_or_imp] at hp
exact hp.2)) := rfl
/-- Opposite direction of `Vector.pmap_cons` -/
theorem pmap_cons' {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (a : α) (v : Vector α n)
(ha : p a) (hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
cons (f a ha) (v.pmap f hp) = (cons a v).pmap f (by simpa [ha]) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).toList = v.toList.map f := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) : (v.map f).head = f v.head := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, head_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α (n + 1)) (f : α → β) :
(v.map f).tail = v.tail.map f := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
rw [h, map_cons, tail_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.map f)[i] = f v[i] := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_map, List.getElem_map]
@[simp]
theorem toList_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).toList = v.toList.pmap f hp := by cases v; rfl
@[simp]
theorem head_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).head = f v.head (hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, head_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inl rfl) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, head_cons]
@[simp]
theorem tail_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α (n + 1))
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) :
(v.pmap f hp).tail = v.tail.pmap f (fun x hx ↦ hp _ <| by
rw [← cons_head_tail v, toList_cons, List.mem_cons]; exact .inr hx) := by
obtain ⟨a, v', h⟩ := Vector.exists_eq_cons v
simp_rw [h, pmap_cons, tail_cons]
@[simp]
theorem getElem_pmap {p : α → Prop} (f : (a : α) → p a → β) (v : Vector α n)
(hp : ∀ x ∈ v.toList, p x) {i : ℕ} (hi : i < n) :
(v.pmap f hp)[i] = f v[i] (hp _ (by simp [getElem_def, List.getElem_mem])) := by
simp only [getElem_def, toList_pmap, List.getElem_pmap]
theorem get_eq_get_toList (v : Vector α n) (i : Fin n) :
v.get i = v.toList.get (Fin.cast v.toList_length.symm i) :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-20")]
alias get_eq_get := get_eq_get_toList
@[simp]
theorem get_replicate (a : α) (i : Fin n) : (Vector.replicate n a).get i = a := by
apply List.getElem_replicate
@[simp]
theorem get_map {β : Type*} (v : Vector α n) (f : α → β) (i : Fin n) :
(v.map f).get i = f (v.get i) := by
cases v; simp [Vector.map, get_eq_get_toList]
@[simp]
theorem map₂_nil (f : α → β → γ) : Vector.map₂ f nil nil = nil :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem map₂_cons (hd₁ : α) (tl₁ : Vector α n) (hd₂ : β) (tl₂ : Vector β n) (f : α → β → γ) :
Vector.map₂ f (hd₁ ::ᵥ tl₁) (hd₂ ::ᵥ tl₂) = f hd₁ hd₂ ::ᵥ (Vector.map₂ f tl₁ tl₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem get_ofFn {n} (f : Fin n → α) (i) : get (ofFn f) i = f i := by
conv_rhs => erw [← List.get_ofFn f ⟨i, by simp⟩]
simp only [get_eq_get_toList]
congr <;> simp [Fin.heq_ext_iff]
@[simp]
theorem ofFn_get (v : Vector α n) : ofFn (get v) = v := by
rcases v with ⟨l, rfl⟩
apply toList_injective
dsimp
simpa only [toList_ofFn] using List.ofFn_get _
/-- The natural equivalence between length-`n` vectors and functions from `Fin n`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.vectorEquivFin (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) : Vector α n ≃ (Fin n → α) :=
⟨Vector.get, Vector.ofFn, Vector.ofFn_get, fun f => funext <| Vector.get_ofFn f⟩
theorem get_tail (x : Vector α n) (i) : x.tail.get i = x.get ⟨i.1 + 1, by omega⟩ := by
obtain ⟨i, ih⟩ := i; dsimp
rcases x with ⟨_ | _, h⟩ <;> try rfl
rw [List.length] at h
rw [← h] at ih
contradiction
@[simp]
theorem get_tail_succ : ∀ (v : Vector α n.succ) (i : Fin n), get (tail v) i = get v i.succ
| ⟨a :: l, e⟩, ⟨i, h⟩ => by simp [get_eq_get_toList]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_val : ∀ v : Vector α n.succ, v.tail.val = v.val.tail
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
/-- The `tail` of a `nil` vector is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_nil : (@nil α).tail = nil :=
rfl
/-- The `tail` of a vector made up of one element is `nil`. -/
@[simp]
theorem singleton_tail : ∀ (v : Vector α 1), v.tail = Vector.nil
| ⟨[_], _⟩ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem tail_ofFn {n : ℕ} (f : Fin n.succ → α) : tail (ofFn f) = ofFn fun i => f i.succ :=
(ofFn_get _).symm.trans <| by
congr
funext i
rw [get_tail, get_ofFn]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toList_empty (v : Vector α 0) : v.toList = [] :=
List.length_eq_zero_iff.mp v.2
/-- The list that makes up a `Vector` made up of a single element,
retrieved via `toList`, is equal to the list of that single element. -/
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (v : Vector α 1) : v.toList = [v.head] := by
rw [← v.cons_head_tail]
simp only [toList_cons, toList_nil, head_cons, eq_self_iff_true, and_self_iff, singleton_tail]
@[simp]
theorem empty_toList_eq_ff (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : v.toList.isEmpty = false :=
match v with
| ⟨_ :: _, _⟩ => rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Vector/Basic.lean | 227 | 228 | theorem not_empty_toList (v : Vector α (n + 1)) : ¬v.toList.isEmpty := by | simp only [empty_toList_eq_ff, Bool.coe_sort_false, not_false_iff] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.IsPoly
/-!
# `init` and `tail`
Given a Witt vector `x`, we are sometimes interested
in its components before and after an index `n`.
This file defines those operations, proves that `init` is polynomial,
and shows how that polynomial interacts with `MvPolynomial.bind₁`.
## Main declarations
* `WittVector.init n x`: the first `n` coefficients of `x`, as a Witt vector. All coefficients at
indices ≥ `n` are 0.
* `WittVector.tail n x`: the complementary part to `init`. All coefficients at indices < `n` are 0,
otherwise they are the same as in `x`.
* `WittVector.coeff_add_of_disjoint`: if `x` and `y` are Witt vectors such that for every `n`
the `n`-th coefficient of `x` or of `y` is `0`, then the coefficients of `x + y`
are just `x.coeff n + y.coeff n`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
variable {p : ℕ} (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} [CommRing R]
-- type as `\bbW`
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p
namespace WittVector
open MvPolynomial
noncomputable section
section
open scoped Classical in
/-- `WittVector.select P x`, for a predicate `P : ℕ → Prop` is the Witt vector
whose `n`-th coefficient is `x.coeff n` if `P n` is true, and `0` otherwise.
-/
def select (P : ℕ → Prop) (x : 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => if P n then x.coeff n else 0
section Select
variable (P : ℕ → Prop)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The polynomial that witnesses that `WittVector.select` is a polynomial function.
`selectPoly n` is `X n` if `P n` holds, and `0` otherwise. -/
def selectPoly (n : ℕ) : MvPolynomial ℕ ℤ :=
if P n then X n else 0
theorem coeff_select (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) :
(select P x).coeff n = aeval x.coeff (selectPoly P n) := by
dsimp [select, selectPoly]
split_ifs with hi
· rw [aeval_X, mk]; simp only [hi, if_true]
· rw [map_zero, mk]; simp only [hi, if_false]
-- Porting note: replaced `@[is_poly]` with `instance`. Made the argument `P` implicit in doing so.
instance select_isPoly {P : ℕ → Prop} : IsPoly p fun _ _ x => select P x := by
use selectPoly P
rintro R _Rcr x
funext i
apply coeff_select
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime]
theorem select_add_select_not : ∀ x : 𝕎 R, select P x + select (fun i => ¬P i) x = x := by
-- Porting note: TC search was insufficient to find this instance, even though all required
-- instances exist. See zulip: [https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/WittVector.20saga/near/370073526]
have : IsPoly p fun {R} [CommRing R] x ↦ select P x + select (fun i ↦ ¬P i) x :=
IsPoly₂.diag (hf := IsPoly₂.comp)
ghost_calc x
intro n
simp only [RingHom.map_add]
suffices
(bind₁ (selectPoly P)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) +
(bind₁ (selectPoly fun i => ¬P i)) (wittPolynomial p ℤ n) =
wittPolynomial p ℤ n by
apply_fun aeval x.coeff at this
simpa only [map_add, aeval_bind₁, ← coeff_select]
simp only [wittPolynomial_eq_sum_C_mul_X_pow, selectPoly, map_sum, map_pow, map_mul,
bind₁_X_right, bind₁_C_right, ← Finset.sum_add_distrib, ← mul_add]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
refine fun m _ => mul_eq_mul_left_iff.mpr (Or.inl ?_)
rw [ite_pow, zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.out.ne_zero)]
by_cases Pm : P m
· rw [if_pos Pm, if_neg <| not_not_intro Pm, zero_pow Fin.pos'.ne', add_zero]
· rwa [if_neg Pm, if_pos, zero_add]
theorem coeff_add_of_disjoint (x y : 𝕎 R) (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = 0 ∨ y.coeff n = 0) :
(x + y).coeff n = x.coeff n + y.coeff n := by
let P : ℕ → Prop := fun n => y.coeff n = 0
haveI : DecidablePred P := Classical.decPred P
set z := mk p fun n => if P n then x.coeff n else y.coeff n
have hx : select P z = x := by
ext1 n; rw [select, coeff_mk, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hn
· rfl
· rw [(h n).resolve_right hn]
have hy : select (fun i => ¬P i) z = y := by
ext1 n; rw [select, coeff_mk, coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hn
· exact hn.symm
· rfl
calc
(x + y).coeff n = z.coeff n := by rw [← hx, ← hy, select_add_select_not P z]
_ = x.coeff n + y.coeff n := by
simp only [z, mk.eq_1]
split_ifs with y0
· rw [y0, add_zero]
· rw [h n |>.resolve_right y0, zero_add]
end Select
variable [Fact p.Prime]
/-- `WittVector.init n x` is the Witt vector of which the first `n` coefficients are those from `x`
and all other coefficients are `0`.
See `WittVector.tail` for the complementary part.
-/
def init (n : ℕ) : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R :=
select fun i => i < n
/-- `WittVector.tail n x` is the Witt vector of which the first `n` coefficients are `0`
and all other coefficients are those from `x`.
See `WittVector.init` for the complementary part. -/
def tail (n : ℕ) : 𝕎 R → 𝕎 R :=
select fun i => n ≤ i
@[simp]
theorem init_add_tail (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n x + tail n x = x := by
simp only [init, tail, ← not_lt, select_add_select_not]
end
/--
`init_ring` is an auxiliary tactic that discharges goals factoring `init` over ring operations.
-/
syntax (name := initRing) "init_ring" (" using " term)? : tactic
-- Porting note: this tactic requires that we turn hygiene off (note the free `n`).
-- TODO: make this tactic hygienic.
open Lean Elab Tactic in
elab_rules : tactic
| `(tactic| init_ring $[ using $a:term]?) => withMainContext <| set_option hygiene false in do
evalTactic <|← `(tactic|(
rw [WittVector.ext_iff]
intro i
simp only [WittVector.init, WittVector.select, WittVector.coeff_mk]
split_ifs with hi <;> try {rfl}
))
if let some e := a then
evalTactic <|← `(tactic|(
simp only [WittVector.add_coeff, WittVector.mul_coeff, WittVector.neg_coeff,
WittVector.sub_coeff, WittVector.nsmul_coeff, WittVector.zsmul_coeff, WittVector.pow_coeff]
apply MvPolynomial.eval₂Hom_congr' (RingHom.ext_int _ _) _ rfl
rintro ⟨b, k⟩ h -
replace h := $e:term p _ h
simp only [Finset.mem_range, Finset.mem_product, true_and, Finset.mem_univ] at h
have hk : k < n := by omega
fin_cases b <;> simp only [Function.uncurry, Matrix.cons_val_zero, Matrix.head_cons,
WittVector.coeff_mk, Matrix.cons_val_one, WittVector.mk, Fin.mk_zero, Matrix.cons_val',
Matrix.empty_val', Matrix.cons_val_fin_one, Matrix.cons_val_zero,
hk, if_true]
))
-- Porting note: `by init_ring` should suffice; this patches over an issue with `split_ifs`.
-- See zulip: [https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/.60split_ifs.60.20boxes.20itself.20into.20a.20corner]
@[simp]
theorem init_init (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (init n x) = init n x := by
rw [WittVector.ext_iff]
intro i
simp only [WittVector.init, WittVector.select, WittVector.coeff_mk]
by_cases hi : i < n <;> simp [hi]
section
variable [Fact p.Prime]
theorem init_add (x y : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (x + y) = init n (init n x + init n y) := by
init_ring using wittAdd_vars
theorem init_mul (x y : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (x * y) = init n (init n x * init n y) := by
init_ring using wittMul_vars
theorem init_neg (x : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (-x) = init n (-init n x) := by
init_ring using wittNeg_vars
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/InitTail.lean | 205 | 206 | theorem init_sub (x y : 𝕎 R) (n : ℕ) : init n (x - y) = init n (init n x - init n y) := by | init_ring using wittSub_vars |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Degree
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
/-!
# Degrees of polynomials
This file establishes many results about the degree of a multivariate polynomial.
The *degree set* of a polynomial $P \in R[X]$ is a `Multiset` containing, for each $x$ in the
variable set, $n$ copies of $x$, where $n$ is the maximum number of copies of $x$ appearing in a
monomial of $P$.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.degrees p` : the multiset of variables representing the union of the multisets
corresponding to each non-zero monomial in `p`.
For example if `7 ≠ 0` in `R` and `p = x²y+7y³` then `degrees p = {x, x, y, y, y}`
* `MvPolynomial.degreeOf n p : ℕ` : the total degree of `p` with respect to the variable `n`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `degreeOf y p = 1`.
* `MvPolynomial.totalDegree p : ℕ` :
the max of the sizes of the multisets `s` whose monomials `X^s` occur in `p`.
For example if `p = x⁴y+yz` then `totalDegree p = 5`.
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
universe u v w
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v}
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ : Type*} {r : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
section Degrees
/-! ### `degrees` -/
/-- The maximal degrees of each variable in a multi-variable polynomial, expressed as a multiset.
(For example, `degrees (x^2 * y + y^3)` would be `{x, x, y, y, y}`.)
-/
def degrees (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Multiset σ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => toMultiset s
theorem degrees_def [DecidableEq σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degrees = p.support.sup fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => Finsupp.toMultiset s := by rw [degrees]; convert rfl
theorem degrees_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : degrees (monomial s a) ≤ toMultiset s := by
classical
refine (supDegree_single s a).trans_le ?_
split_ifs
exacts [bot_le, le_rfl]
theorem degrees_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) (ha : a ≠ 0) :
degrees (monomial s a) = toMultiset s := by
classical
exact (supDegree_single s a).trans (if_neg ha)
theorem degrees_C (a : R) : degrees (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
Multiset.le_zero.1 <| degrees_monomial _ _
theorem degrees_X' (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ≤ {n} :=
le_trans (degrees_monomial _ _) <| le_of_eq <| toMultiset_single _ _
@[simp]
theorem degrees_X [Nontrivial R] (n : σ) : degrees (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) = {n} :=
(degrees_monomial_eq _ (1 : R) one_ne_zero).trans (toMultiset_single _ _)
@[simp]
theorem degrees_zero : degrees (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
rw [← C_0]
exact degrees_C 0
@[simp]
theorem degrees_one : degrees (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
degrees_C 1
theorem degrees_add_le [DecidableEq σ] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(p + q).degrees ≤ p.degrees ⊔ q.degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem degrees_sum_le {ι : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ s.sup fun i => (f i).degrees := by
simp_rw [degrees_def]; exact supDegree_sum_le
theorem degrees_mul_le {p q : MvPolynomial σ R} : (p * q).degrees ≤ p.degrees + q.degrees := by
classical
simp_rw [degrees_def]
exact supDegree_mul_le (map_add _)
theorem degrees_prod_le {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i).degrees ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, (f i).degrees := by
classical exact supDegree_prod_le (map_zero _) (map_add _)
theorem degrees_pow_le {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {n : ℕ} : (p ^ n).degrees ≤ n • p.degrees := by
simpa using degrees_prod_le (s := .range n) (f := fun _ ↦ p)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_add := degrees_add_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_sum := degrees_sum_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_mul := degrees_mul_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_prod := degrees_prod_le
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_pow := degrees_pow_le
theorem mem_degrees {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {i : σ} :
i ∈ p.degrees ↔ ∃ d, p.coeff d ≠ 0 ∧ i ∈ d.support := by
classical
simp only [degrees_def, Multiset.mem_sup, ← mem_support_iff, Finsupp.mem_toMultiset, exists_prop]
theorem le_degrees_add_left (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : p.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
classical
apply Finset.sup_le
intro d hd
rw [Multiset.disjoint_iff_ne] at h
obtain rfl | h0 := eq_or_ne d 0
· rw [toMultiset_zero]; apply Multiset.zero_le
· refine Finset.le_sup_of_le (b := d) ?_ le_rfl
rw [mem_support_iff, coeff_add]
suffices q.coeff d = 0 by rwa [this, add_zero, coeff, ← Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
rw [Ne, ← Finsupp.support_eq_empty, ← Ne, ← Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty] at h0
obtain ⟨j, hj⟩ := h0
contrapose! h
rw [mem_support_iff] at hd
refine ⟨j, ?_, j, ?_, rfl⟩
all_goals rw [mem_degrees]; refine ⟨d, ?_, hj⟩; assumption
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias le_degrees_add := le_degrees_add_left
lemma le_degrees_add_right (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) : q.degrees ≤ (p + q).degrees := by
simpa [add_comm] using le_degrees_add_left h.symm
theorem degrees_add_of_disjoint [DecidableEq σ] (h : Disjoint p.degrees q.degrees) :
(p + q).degrees = p.degrees ∪ q.degrees :=
degrees_add_le.antisymm <| Multiset.union_le (le_degrees_add_left h) (le_degrees_add_right h)
lemma degrees_map_le [CommSemiring S] {f : R →+* S} : (map f p).degrees ≤ p.degrees := by
classical exact Finset.sup_mono <| support_map_subset ..
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-28")] alias degrees_map := degrees_map_le
theorem degrees_rename (f : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(rename f φ).degrees ⊆ φ.degrees.map f := by
classical
intro i
rw [mem_degrees, Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨d, hd, hi⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl, hx⟩ := coeff_rename_ne_zero _ _ _ hd
simp only [Finsupp.mapDomain, Finsupp.mem_support_iff] at hi
rw [sum_apply, Finsupp.sum] at hi
contrapose! hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_zero]
intro j hj
simp only [exists_prop, mem_degrees] at hi
specialize hi j ⟨x, hx, hj⟩
rw [Finsupp.single_apply, if_neg hi]
theorem degrees_map_of_injective [CommSemiring S] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) {f : R →+* S}
(hf : Injective f) : (map f p).degrees = p.degrees := by
simp only [degrees, MvPolynomial.support_map_of_injective _ hf]
theorem degrees_rename_of_injective {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {f : σ → τ} (h : Function.Injective f) :
degrees (rename f p) = (degrees p).map f := by
classical
simp only [degrees, Multiset.map_finset_sup p.support Finsupp.toMultiset f h,
support_rename_of_injective h, Finset.sup_image]
refine Finset.sup_congr rfl fun x _ => ?_
exact (Finsupp.toMultiset_map _ _).symm
end Degrees
section DegreeOf
/-! ### `degreeOf` -/
/-- `degreeOf n p` gives the highest power of X_n that appears in `p` -/
def degreeOf (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq σ
p.degrees.count n
theorem degreeOf_def [DecidableEq σ] (n : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.degreeOf n = p.degrees.count n := by rw [degreeOf]; convert rfl
theorem degreeOf_eq_sup (n : σ) (f : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n f = f.support.sup fun m => m n := by
classical
rw [degreeOf_def, degrees, Multiset.count_finset_sup]
congr
ext
simp only [count_toMultiset]
theorem degreeOf_lt_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} (h : 0 < d) :
degreeOf n f < d ↔ ∀ m : σ →₀ ℕ, m ∈ f.support → m n < d := by
rwa [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
lemma degreeOf_le_iff {n : σ} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {d : ℕ} :
degreeOf n f ≤ d ↔ ∀ m ∈ support f, m n ≤ d := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup, Finset.sup_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_zero (n : σ) : degreeOf n (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp only [degreeOf_def, degrees_zero, Multiset.count_zero]
@[simp]
theorem degreeOf_C (a : R) (x : σ) : degreeOf x (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
classical simp [degreeOf_def, degrees_C]
theorem degreeOf_X [DecidableEq σ] (i j : σ) [Nontrivial R] :
degreeOf i (X j : MvPolynomial σ R) = if i = j then 1 else 0 := by
classical
by_cases c : i = j
· simp only [c, if_true, eq_self_iff_true, degreeOf_def, degrees_X, Multiset.count_singleton]
simp [c, if_false, degreeOf_def, degrees_X]
theorem degreeOf_add_le (n : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf n (f + g) ≤ max (degreeOf n f) (degreeOf n g) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]; exact supDegree_add_le
theorem monomial_le_degreeOf (i : σ) {f : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} (h_m : m ∈ f.support) :
m i ≤ degreeOf i f := by
rw [degreeOf_eq_sup i]
apply Finset.le_sup h_m
lemma degreeOf_monomial_eq (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (i : σ) {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(monomial s a).degreeOf i = s i := by
classical rw [degreeOf_def, degrees_monomial_eq _ _ ha, Finsupp.count_toMultiset]
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_mul_le (i : σ) (f g : MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (f * g) ≤ degreeOf i f + degreeOf i g := by
classical
simp only [degreeOf]
convert Multiset.count_le_of_le i degrees_mul_le
rw [Multiset.count_add]
theorem degreeOf_sum_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∑ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ s.sup fun j => degreeOf i (f j) := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_sum_le
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
theorem degreeOf_prod_le {ι : Type*} (i : σ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → MvPolynomial σ R) :
degreeOf i (∏ j ∈ s, f j) ≤ ∑ j ∈ s, (f j).degreeOf i := by
simp_rw [degreeOf_eq_sup]
exact supDegree_prod_le (by simp only [coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply])
(fun _ _ => by simp only [coe_add, Pi.add_apply])
-- TODO we can prove equality with `NoZeroDivisors R`
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Degrees.lean | 283 | 285 | theorem degreeOf_pow_le (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : ℕ) :
degreeOf i (p ^ n) ≤ n * degreeOf i p := by | simpa using degreeOf_prod_le i (Finset.range n) (fun _ => p) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Monad
/-!
## Expand multivariate polynomials
Given a multivariate polynomial `φ`, one may replace every occurrence of `X i` by `X i ^ n`,
for some natural number `n`.
This operation is called `MvPolynomial.expand` and it is an algebra homomorphism.
### Main declaration
* `MvPolynomial.expand`: expand a polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
-/
namespace MvPolynomial
variable {σ τ R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
/-- Expand the polynomial by a factor of p, so `∑ aₙ xⁿ` becomes `∑ aₙ xⁿᵖ`.
See also `Polynomial.expand`. -/
noncomputable def expand (p : ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ (eval₂Hom C fun i ↦ X i ^ p : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) with
commutes' := fun _ ↦ eval₂Hom_C _ _ _ }
theorem expand_C (p : ℕ) (r : R) : expand p (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C r :=
eval₂Hom_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_X (p : ℕ) (i : σ) : expand p (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X i ^ p :=
eval₂Hom_X' _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem expand_monomial (p : ℕ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
expand p (monomial d r) = C r * ∏ i ∈ d.support, (X i ^ p) ^ d i :=
bind₁_monomial _ _ _
theorem expand_one_apply (f : MvPolynomial σ R) : expand 1 f = f := by
simp only [expand, pow_one, eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂, bind₂_C_left, RingHom.toMonoidHom_eq_coe,
RingHom.coe_monoidHom_id, AlgHom.coe_mk, RingHom.coe_mk, MonoidHom.id_apply, RingHom.id_apply]
@[simp]
theorem expand_one : expand 1 = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) := by
ext1 f
rw [expand_one_apply, AlgHom.id_apply]
theorem expand_comp_bind₁ (p : ℕ) (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) :
(expand p).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i ↦ expand p (f i) := by
apply algHom_ext
intro i
simp only [AlgHom.comp_apply, bind₁_X_right]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Expand.lean | 59 | 61 | theorem expand_bind₁ (p : ℕ) (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
expand p (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i ↦ expand p (f i)) φ := by | rw [← AlgHom.comp_apply, expand_comp_bind₁] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Mario Carneiro, Johan Commelin, Amelia Livingston, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.NonZeroDivisors
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Lifts
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Algebraic.Integral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IntegralClosure.Algebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.Integer
/-!
# Integral and algebraic elements of a fraction field
## Implementation notes
See `Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Basic.lean` for a design overview.
## Tags
localization, ring localization, commutative ring localization, characteristic predicate,
commutative ring, field of fractions
-/
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] (M : Submonoid R) {S : Type*} [CommRing S]
variable [Algebra R S]
open Polynomial
namespace IsLocalization
section IntegerNormalization
open Polynomial
variable [IsLocalization M S]
open scoped Classical in
/-- `coeffIntegerNormalization p` gives the coefficients of the polynomial
`integerNormalization p` -/
noncomputable def coeffIntegerNormalization (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) : R :=
if hi : i ∈ p.support then
Classical.choose
(Classical.choose_spec (exist_integer_multiples_of_finset M (p.support.image p.coeff))
(p.coeff i) (Finset.mem_image.mpr ⟨i, hi, rfl⟩))
else 0
theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_of_not_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ) (h : coeff p i = 0) :
coeffIntegerNormalization M p i = 0 := by
simp only [coeffIntegerNormalization, h, mem_support_iff, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Ne,
dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Localization/Integral.lean | 55 | 58 | theorem coeffIntegerNormalization_mem_support (p : S[X]) (i : ℕ)
(h : coeffIntegerNormalization M p i ≠ 0) : i ∈ p.support := by | contrapose h
rw [Ne, Classical.not_not, coeffIntegerNormalization, dif_neg h] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Domain
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Degree.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Eval.Coeff
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Ring
/-!
# The derivative map on polynomials
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.derivative`: The formal derivative of polynomials, expressed as a linear map.
* `Polynomial.derivativeFinsupp`: Iterated derivatives as a finite support function.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
open scoped Nat
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w y z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {ι : Type y} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Derivative
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
/-- `derivative p` is the formal derivative of the polynomial `p` -/
def derivative : R[X] →ₗ[R] R[X] where
toFun p := p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1)
map_add' p q := by
rw [sum_add_index] <;>
simp only [add_mul, forall_const, RingHom.map_add, eq_self_iff_true, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero]
map_smul' a p := by
dsimp; rw [sum_smul_index] <;>
simp only [mul_sum, ← C_mul', mul_assoc, coeff_C_mul, RingHom.map_mul, forall_const, zero_mul,
RingHom.map_zero, sum]
theorem derivative_apply (p : R[X]) : derivative p = p.sum fun n a => C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) :=
rfl
theorem coeff_derivative (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
coeff (derivative p) n = coeff p (n + 1) * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivative_apply]
simp only [coeff_X_pow, coeff_sum, coeff_C_mul]
rw [sum, Finset.sum_eq_single (n + 1)]
· simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, mul_one, if_true, eq_self_iff_true]; norm_cast
· intro b
cases b
· intros
rw [Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, zero_mul]
· intro _ H
rw [Nat.add_one_sub_one, if_neg (mt (congr_arg Nat.succ) H.symm), mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (add_tsub_cancel_right n 1).symm, mul_one, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
mem_support_iff]
intro h
push_neg at h
simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_zero : derivative (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative.map_zero
theorem iterate_derivative_zero {k : ℕ} : derivative^[k] (0 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_map_zero derivative k
theorem derivative_monomial (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial n a) = monomial (n - 1) (a * n) := by
rw [derivative_apply, sum_monomial_index, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial]
simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_monomial_succ (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (monomial (n + 1) a) = monomial n (a * (n + 1)) := by
rw [derivative_monomial, add_tsub_cancel_right, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X (a : R) : derivative (C a * X) = C a := by
simp [C_mul_X_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial, Nat.cast_one, mul_one]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (C a * X ^ n) = C (a * n) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
rw [C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, derivative_monomial]
theorem derivative_C_mul_X_sq (a : R) : derivative (C a * X ^ 2) = C (a * 2) * X := by
rw [derivative_C_mul_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
theorem derivative_X_pow (n : ℕ) : derivative (X ^ n : R[X]) = C (n : R) * X ^ (n - 1) := by
convert derivative_C_mul_X_pow (1 : R) n <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
derivative (X ^ (n + 1) : R[X]) = C (n + 1 : R) * X ^ n := by
simp [derivative_X_pow]
theorem derivative_X_sq : derivative (X ^ 2 : R[X]) = C 2 * X := by
rw [derivative_X_pow, Nat.cast_two, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_C {a : R} : derivative (C a) = 0 := by simp [derivative_apply]
theorem derivative_of_natDegree_zero {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree = 0) : derivative p = 0 := by
rw [eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero hp, derivative_C]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_X : derivative (X : R[X]) = 1 :=
(derivative_monomial _ _).trans <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem derivative_one : derivative (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem derivative_add {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f + g) = derivative f + derivative g :=
derivative.map_add f g
theorem derivative_X_add_C (c : R) : derivative (X + C c) = 1 := by
rw [derivative_add, derivative_X, derivative_C, add_zero]
theorem derivative_sum {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → R[X]} :
derivative (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative (f b) :=
map_sum ..
theorem iterate_derivative_sum (k : ℕ) (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → R[X]) :
derivative^[k] (∑ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ b ∈ s, derivative^[k] (f b) := by
simp_rw [← Module.End.pow_apply, map_sum]
theorem derivative_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] [IsScalarTower S R R] (s : S)
(p : R[X]) : derivative (s • p) = s • derivative p :=
derivative.map_smul_of_tower s p
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_smul {S : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S R] [IsScalarTower S R R]
(s : S) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) : derivative^[k] (s • p) = s • derivative^[k] p := by
induction k generalizing p with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih => simp [ih]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] (C a * p) = C a * derivative^[k] p := by
simp_rw [← smul_eq_C_mul, iterate_derivative_smul]
theorem derivative_C_mul (a : R) (p : R[X]) :
derivative (C a * p) = C a * derivative p := iterate_derivative_C_mul _ _ 1
theorem of_mem_support_derivative {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : n ∈ p.derivative.support) :
n + 1 ∈ p.support :=
mem_support_iff.2 fun h1 : p.coeff (n + 1) = 0 =>
mem_support_iff.1 h <| show p.derivative.coeff n = 0 by rw [coeff_derivative, h1, zero_mul]
theorem degree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : p.derivative.degree < p.degree :=
(Finset.sup_lt_iff <| bot_lt_iff_ne_bot.2 <| mt degree_eq_bot.1 hp).2 fun n hp =>
lt_of_lt_of_le (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.2 n.lt_succ_self) <|
Finset.le_sup <| of_mem_support_derivative hp
theorem degree_derivative_le {p : R[X]} : p.derivative.degree ≤ p.degree :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if H : p = 0 then le_of_eq <| by rw [H, derivative_zero] else (degree_derivative_lt H).le
theorem natDegree_derivative_lt {p : R[X]} (hp : p.natDegree ≠ 0) :
p.derivative.natDegree < p.natDegree := by
rcases eq_or_ne (derivative p) 0 with hp' | hp'
· rw [hp', Polynomial.natDegree_zero]
exact hp.bot_lt
· rw [natDegree_lt_natDegree_iff hp']
exact degree_derivative_lt fun h => hp (h.symm ▸ natDegree_zero)
theorem natDegree_derivative_le (p : R[X]) : p.derivative.natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - 1 := by
by_cases p0 : p.natDegree = 0
· simp [p0, derivative_of_natDegree_zero]
· exact Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt (natDegree_derivative_lt p0)
theorem natDegree_iterate_derivative (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).natDegree ≤ p.natDegree - k := by
induction k with
| zero => rw [Function.iterate_zero_apply, Nat.sub_zero]
| succ d hd =>
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', Nat.sub_succ']
exact (natDegree_derivative_le _).trans <| Nat.sub_le_sub_right hd 1
@[simp]
theorem derivative_natCast {n : ℕ} : derivative (n : R[X]) = 0 := by
rw [← map_natCast C n]
exact derivative_C
@[simp]
theorem derivative_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
derivative (ofNat(n) : R[X]) = 0 :=
derivative_natCast
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {x : ℕ} (hx : p.natDegree < x) :
Polynomial.derivative^[x] p = 0 := by
induction' h : p.natDegree using Nat.strong_induction_on with _ ih generalizing p x
subst h
obtain ⟨t, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_of_gt hx).ne'
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply]
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [derivative_of_natDegree_zero hp, iterate_derivative_zero]
have := natDegree_derivative_lt hp
exact ih _ this (this.trans_le <| Nat.le_of_lt_succ hx) rfl
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_C {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (C a : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| (natDegree_C _).trans_lt h
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_one {k} (h : 0 < k) : derivative^[k] (1 : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_C h
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_X {k} (h : 1 < k) : derivative^[k] (X : R[X]) = 0 :=
iterate_derivative_eq_zero <| natDegree_X_le.trans_lt h
theorem natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]}
(h : derivative f = 0) : f.natDegree = 0 := by
rcases eq_or_ne f 0 with (rfl | hf)
· exact natDegree_zero
rw [natDegree_eq_zero_iff_degree_le_zero]
by_contra! f_nat_degree_pos
rw [← natDegree_pos_iff_degree_pos] at f_nat_degree_pos
let m := f.natDegree - 1
have hm : m + 1 = f.natDegree := tsub_add_cancel_of_le f_nat_degree_pos
have h2 := coeff_derivative f m
rw [Polynomial.ext_iff] at h
rw [h m, coeff_zero, ← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', eq_comm, smul_eq_zero] at h2
replace h2 := h2.resolve_left m.succ_ne_zero
rw [hm, ← leadingCoeff, leadingCoeff_eq_zero] at h2
exact hf h2
theorem eq_C_of_derivative_eq_zero [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f : R[X]} (h : derivative f = 0) :
f = C (f.coeff 0) :=
eq_C_of_natDegree_eq_zero <| natDegree_eq_zero_of_derivative_eq_zero h
@[simp]
theorem derivative_mul {f g : R[X]} : derivative (f * g) = derivative f * g + f * derivative g := by
induction f using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add => simp only [add_mul, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| monomial m a => ?_
induction g using Polynomial.induction_on' with
| add => simp only [mul_add, map_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm, *]
| monomial n b => ?_
simp only [monomial_mul_monomial, derivative_monomial]
simp only [mul_assoc, (Nat.cast_commute _ _).eq, Nat.cast_add, mul_add, map_add]
cases m with
| zero => simp only [zero_add, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ m =>
cases n with
| zero => simp only [add_zero, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, map_zero]
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.add_succ_sub_one, add_tsub_cancel_right]
rw [add_assoc, add_comm n 1]
theorem derivative_eval (p : R[X]) (x : R) :
p.derivative.eval x = p.sum fun n a => a * n * x ^ (n - 1) := by
simp_rw [derivative_apply, eval_sum, eval_mul_X_pow, eval_C]
@[simp]
theorem derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivative (p.map f) = p.derivative.map f := by
let n := max p.natDegree (map f p).natDegree
rw [derivative_apply, derivative_apply]
rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_left _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
on_goal 1 => rw [sum_over_range' _ _ (n + 1) ((le_max_right _ _).trans_lt (lt_add_one _))]
· simp only [Polynomial.map_sum, Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_C, map_mul, coeff_map,
map_natCast, Polynomial.map_natCast, Polynomial.map_pow, map_X]
all_goals intro n; rw [zero_mul, C_0, zero_mul]
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) (k : ℕ) :
Polynomial.derivative^[k] (p.map f) = (Polynomial.derivative^[k] p).map f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing p
· simp
· simp only [ih, Function.iterate_succ, Polynomial.derivative_map, Function.comp_apply]
theorem derivative_natCast_mul {n : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative f := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem iterate_derivative_natCast_mul {n k : ℕ} {f : R[X]} :
derivative^[k] ((n : R[X]) * f) = n * derivative^[k] f := by
induction' k with k ih generalizing f <;> simp [*]
theorem mem_support_derivative [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
n ∈ (derivative p).support ↔ n + 1 ∈ p.support := by
suffices ¬p.coeff (n + 1) * (n + 1 : ℕ) = 0 ↔ coeff p (n + 1) ≠ 0 by
simpa only [mem_support_iff, coeff_derivative, Ne, Nat.cast_succ]
rw [← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_eq_zero]
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
@[simp]
theorem degree_derivative_eq [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] (p : R[X]) (hp : 0 < natDegree p) :
degree (derivative p) = (natDegree p - 1 : ℕ) := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [derivative_apply]
apply le_trans (degree_sum_le _ _) (Finset.sup_le _)
intro n hn
apply le_trans (degree_C_mul_X_pow_le _ _) (WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (tsub_le_tsub_right _ _))
apply le_natDegree_of_mem_supp _ hn
· refine le_sup ?_
rw [mem_support_derivative, tsub_add_cancel_of_le, mem_support_iff]
· rw [coeff_natDegree, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
intro h
rw [h, natDegree_zero] at hp
exact hp.false
exact hp
theorem coeff_iterate_derivative {k} (p : R[X]) (m : ℕ) :
(derivative^[k] p).coeff m = (m + k).descFactorial k • p.coeff (m + k) := by
induction k generalizing m with
| zero => simp
| succ k ih =>
calc
(derivative^[k + 1] p).coeff m
_ = Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k • p.coeff (m + k.succ) * (m + 1) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', coeff_derivative, ih m.succ, Nat.succ_add, Nat.add_succ]
_ = ((m + 1) * Nat.descFactorial (Nat.succ (m + k)) k) • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.cast_add_one, ← nsmul_eq_mul', smul_smul]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m.succ + k) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [← Nat.succ_add, Nat.descFactorial_succ, add_tsub_cancel_right]
_ = Nat.descFactorial (m + k.succ) k.succ • p.coeff (m + k.succ) := by
rw [Nat.succ_add_eq_add_succ]
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_sum (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] p =
∑ x ∈ (derivative^[k] p).support, C ((x + k).descFactorial k • p.coeff (x + k)) * X ^ x := by
conv_lhs => rw [(derivative^[k] p).as_sum_support_C_mul_X_pow]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ ?_
rw [coeff_iterate_derivative, Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
theorem iterate_derivative_eq_factorial_smul_sum (p : R[X]) (k : ℕ) :
derivative^[k] p = k ! •
∑ x ∈ (derivative^[k] p).support, C ((x + k).choose k • p.coeff (x + k)) * X ^ x := by
conv_lhs => rw [iterate_derivative_eq_sum]
rw [smul_sum]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ ↦ ?_
rw [← smul_mul_assoc, smul_C, smul_smul, Nat.descFactorial_eq_factorial_mul_choose]
theorem iterate_derivative_mul {n} (p q : R[X]) :
derivative^[n] (p * q) =
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
induction n with
| zero =>
simp [Finset.range]
| succ n IH =>
calc
derivative^[n + 1] (p * q) =
derivative (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k] q)) := by
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply', IH]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k + 1] p * derivative^[k] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) := by
simp_rw [derivative_sum, derivative_smul, derivative_mul, Function.iterate_succ_apply',
smul_add, sum_add_distrib]
_ = (∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q) :=
?_
_ = ((∑ k ∈ range n.succ, n.choose k • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
∑ k ∈ range n.succ,
n.choose k.succ • (derivative^[n - k] p * derivative^[k + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
rw [add_comm, add_assoc]
_ = (∑ i ∈ range n.succ,
(n + 1).choose (i + 1) • (derivative^[n + 1 - (i + 1)] p * derivative^[i + 1] q)) +
1 • (derivative^[n + 1] p * derivative^[0] q) := by
simp_rw [Nat.choose_succ_succ, Nat.succ_sub_succ, add_smul, sum_add_distrib]
_ = ∑ k ∈ range n.succ.succ,
n.succ.choose k • (derivative^[n.succ - k] p * derivative^[k] q) := by
rw [sum_range_succ' _ n.succ, Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
congr
refine (sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (congr_arg₂ (· + ·) ?_ ?_)
· rw [sum_range_succ, Nat.choose_succ_self, zero_smul, add_zero]
refine sum_congr rfl fun k hk => ?_
rw [mem_range] at hk
congr
omega
· rw [Nat.choose_zero_right, tsub_zero]
/--
Iterated derivatives as a finite support function.
-/
@[simps! apply_toFun]
noncomputable def derivativeFinsupp : R[X] →ₗ[R] ℕ →₀ R[X] where
toFun p := .onFinset (range (p.natDegree + 1)) (derivative^[·] p) fun i ↦ by
contrapose; simp_all [iterate_derivative_eq_zero, Nat.succ_le]
map_add' _ _ := by ext; simp
map_smul' _ _ := by ext; simp
@[simp]
theorem support_derivativeFinsupp_subset_range {p : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (h : p.natDegree < n) :
(derivativeFinsupp p).support ⊆ range n := by
dsimp [derivativeFinsupp]
exact Finsupp.support_onFinset_subset.trans (Finset.range_subset.mpr h)
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_C (r : R) : derivativeFinsupp (C r : R[X]) = .single 0 (C r) := by
ext i : 1
match i with
| 0 => simp
| i + 1 => simp
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_one : derivativeFinsupp (1 : R[X]) = .single 0 1 := by
simpa using derivativeFinsupp_C (1 : R)
@[simp]
theorem derivativeFinsupp_X : derivativeFinsupp (X : R[X]) = .single 0 X + .single 1 1 := by
ext i : 1
match i with
| 0 => simp
| 1 => simp
| (n + 2) => simp
theorem derivativeFinsupp_map [Semiring S] (p : R[X]) (f : R →+* S) :
derivativeFinsupp (p.map f) = (derivativeFinsupp p).mapRange (·.map f) (by simp) := by
ext i : 1
simp
theorem derivativeFinsupp_derivative (p : R[X]) :
derivativeFinsupp (derivative p) =
(derivativeFinsupp p).comapDomain Nat.succ Nat.succ_injective.injOn := by
ext i : 1
simp
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
theorem derivative_pow_succ (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ (n + 1)) = C (n + 1 : R) * p ^ n * derivative p :=
Nat.recOn n (by simp) fun n ih => by
rw [pow_succ, derivative_mul, ih, Nat.add_one, mul_right_comm, C_add,
add_mul, add_mul, pow_succ, ← mul_assoc, C_1, one_mul]; simp [add_mul]
theorem derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) :
derivative (p ^ n) = C (n : R) * p ^ (n - 1) * derivative p :=
Nat.casesOn n (by rw [pow_zero, derivative_one, Nat.cast_zero, C_0, zero_mul, zero_mul]) fun n =>
by rw [p.derivative_pow_succ n, Nat.add_one_sub_one, n.cast_succ]
theorem derivative_sq (p : R[X]) : derivative (p ^ 2) = C 2 * p * derivative p := by
rw [derivative_pow_succ, Nat.cast_one, one_add_one_eq_two, pow_one]
theorem pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ}
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - 1) ∣ derivative p := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := dvd
rw [derivative_mul, derivative_pow]
exact (((dvd_mul_left _ _).mul_right _).mul_right _).add ((pow_dvd_pow q n.pred_le).mul_right _)
theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd {p q : R[X]} {n : ℕ} (m : ℕ)
(dvd : q ^ n ∣ p) : q ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] p := by
induction m generalizing p with
| zero => simpa
| succ m ih =>
rw [Nat.sub_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
exact pow_sub_one_dvd_derivative_of_pow_dvd (ih dvd)
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Derivative.lean | 477 | 482 | theorem pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (p : R[X]) (n m : ℕ) :
p ^ (n - m) ∣ derivative^[m] (p ^ n) := pow_sub_dvd_iterate_derivative_of_pow_dvd m dvd_rfl
theorem dvd_iterate_derivative_pow (f : R[X]) (n : ℕ) {m : ℕ} (c : R) (hm : m ≠ 0) :
(n : R) ∣ eval c (derivative^[m] (f ^ n)) := by | obtain ⟨m, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hm |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.StructurePolynomial
/-!
# Witt vectors
In this file we define the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors and ring operations on it.
The ring axioms are verified in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean`.
For a fixed commutative ring `R` and prime `p`,
a Witt vector `x : 𝕎 R` is an infinite sequence `ℕ → R` of elements of `R`.
However, the ring operations `+` and `*` are not defined in the obvious component-wise way.
Instead, these operations are defined via certain polynomials
using the machinery in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean`.
The `n`th value of the sum of two Witt vectors can depend on the `0`-th through `n`th values
of the summands. This effectively simulates a “carrying” operation.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector p R`: the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors with coefficients in `R`.
* `WittVector.coeff x n`: projects the `n`th value of the Witt vector `x`.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `WittVector p R` is the ring of `p`-typical Witt vectors over the commutative ring `R`,
where `p` is a prime number.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, this ring is isomorphic to `ℕ → R` (the product of `ℕ` copies of `R`).
If `R` is a ring of characteristic `p`, then `WittVector p R` is a ring of characteristic `0`.
The canonical example is `WittVector p (ZMod p)`,
which is isomorphic to the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`. -/
structure WittVector (p : ℕ) (R : Type*) where mk' ::
/-- `x.coeff n` is the `n`th coefficient of the Witt vector `x`.
This concept does not have a standard name in the literature.
-/
coeff : ℕ → R
-- Porting note: added to make the `p` argument explicit
/-- Construct a Witt vector `mk p x : 𝕎 R` from a sequence `x` of elements of `R`. -/
def WittVector.mk (p : ℕ) {R : Type*} (coeff : ℕ → R) : WittVector p R := mk' coeff
variable {p : ℕ}
/- We cannot make this `localized` notation, because the `p` on the RHS doesn't occur on the left
Hiding the `p` in the notation is very convenient, so we opt for repeating the `local notation`
in other files that use Witt vectors. -/
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
namespace WittVector
variable {R : Type*}
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : 𝕎 R} (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = y.coeff n) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
simp only at h
simp [funext_iff, h]
variable (p)
theorem coeff_mk (x : ℕ → R) : (mk p x).coeff = x :=
rfl
/- These instances are not needed for the rest of the development,
but it is interesting to establish early on that `WittVector p` is a lawful functor. -/
instance : Functor (WittVector p) where
map f v := mk p (f ∘ v.coeff)
mapConst a _ := mk p fun _ => a
instance : LawfulFunctor (WittVector p) where
map_const := rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needs to deconstruct `v` to conclude `{coeff := v.coeff} = v`
id_map _ := rfl
comp_map _ _ _ := rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
open MvPolynomial
section RingOperations
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `0` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZero : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 0
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `1` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittOne : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 1
/-- The polynomials used for defining the addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittAdd : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 + X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNSMul (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZSMul (n : ℤ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for describing the subtraction of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittSub : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 - X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the multiplication of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittMul : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 * X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the negation of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNeg : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (-X 0)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittPow (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 ^ n)
variable {p}
/-- An auxiliary definition used in `WittVector.eval`.
Evaluates a polynomial whose variables come from the disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`,
with a curried evaluation `x`.
This can be defined more generally but we use only a specific instance here. -/
def peval {k : ℕ} (φ : MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → ℕ → R) : R :=
aeval (Function.uncurry x) φ
/-- Let `φ` be a family of polynomials, indexed by natural numbers, whose variables come from the
disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`, and let `xᵢ` be a Witt vector for `0 ≤ i < k`.
`eval φ x` evaluates `φ` mapping the variable `X_(i, n)` to the `n`th coefficient of `xᵢ`.
Instantiating `φ` with certain polynomials defined in
`Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean` establishes the
ring operations on `𝕎 R`. For example, `WittVector.wittAdd` is such a `φ` with `k = 2`;
evaluating this at `(x₀, x₁)` gives us the sum of two Witt vectors `x₀ + x₁`.
-/
def eval {k : ℕ} (φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => peval (φ n) fun i => (x i).coeff
instance : Zero (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittZero p) ![]⟩
instance : Inhabited (𝕎 R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittOne p) ![]⟩
instance : Add (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittAdd p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Sub (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittSub p) ![x, y]⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittNSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittZSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance : Mul (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittMul p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Neg (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x => eval (wittNeg p) ![x]⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (𝕎 R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => eval (wittPow p n) ![x]⟩
instance : NatCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
end RingOperations
section WittStructureSimplifications
@[simp]
theorem wittZero_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : wittZero p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittZero, wittStructureRat, bind₁, aeval_zero', constantCoeff_xInTermsOfW, map_zero,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_zero_eq_one : wittOne p 0 = 1 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_one, bind₁_X_right,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_pos_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : wittOne p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, RingHom.map_zero, map_one, RingHom.map_one,
map_wittStructureInt]
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h n IH => ?_
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [map_mul, map_sub, map_sum, map_pow, bind₁_X_right,
bind₁_C_right]
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [invOf_eq_inv, one_mul, inv_pow, tsub_zero, RingHom.map_one, pow_zero]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, xInTermsOfW_zero, sub_self, bind₁_X_right]
· intro i hin hi0
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hin
rw [IH _ hin (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi0), zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero]
· rw [Finset.mem_range]; intro; contradiction
@[simp]
theorem wittAdd_zero : wittAdd p 0 = X (0, 0) + X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittAdd, wittStructureRat, map_add, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittSub_zero : wittSub p 0 = X (0, 0) - X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittSub, wittStructureRat, map_sub, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittMul_zero : wittMul p 0 = X (0, 0) * X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittMul, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_mul, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittNeg_zero : wittNeg p 0 = -X (0, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittNeg, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_neg, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittAdd (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittAdd p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [add_zero, RingHom.map_add, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittSub (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittSub p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [sub_zero, RingHom.map_sub, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittMul (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittMul p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [mul_zero, RingHom.map_mul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNeg (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNeg p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [neg_zero, RingHom.map_neg, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNSMul (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNSMul p m n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_nsmul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Defs.lean | 279 | 282 | theorem constantCoeff_wittZSMul (z : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittZSMul p z n) = 0 := by | apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_zsmul, constantCoeff_X] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.WittVector.StructurePolynomial
/-!
# Witt vectors
In this file we define the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors and ring operations on it.
The ring axioms are verified in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Basic.lean`.
For a fixed commutative ring `R` and prime `p`,
a Witt vector `x : 𝕎 R` is an infinite sequence `ℕ → R` of elements of `R`.
However, the ring operations `+` and `*` are not defined in the obvious component-wise way.
Instead, these operations are defined via certain polynomials
using the machinery in `Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean`.
The `n`th value of the sum of two Witt vectors can depend on the `0`-th through `n`th values
of the summands. This effectively simulates a “carrying” operation.
## Main definitions
* `WittVector p R`: the type of `p`-typical Witt vectors with coefficients in `R`.
* `WittVector.coeff x n`: projects the `n`th value of the Witt vector `x`.
## Notation
We use notation `𝕎 R`, entered `\bbW`, for the Witt vectors over `R`.
## References
* [Hazewinkel, *Witt Vectors*][Haze09]
* [Commelin and Lewis, *Formalizing the Ring of Witt Vectors*][CL21]
-/
noncomputable section
/-- `WittVector p R` is the ring of `p`-typical Witt vectors over the commutative ring `R`,
where `p` is a prime number.
If `p` is invertible in `R`, this ring is isomorphic to `ℕ → R` (the product of `ℕ` copies of `R`).
If `R` is a ring of characteristic `p`, then `WittVector p R` is a ring of characteristic `0`.
The canonical example is `WittVector p (ZMod p)`,
which is isomorphic to the `p`-adic integers `ℤ_[p]`. -/
structure WittVector (p : ℕ) (R : Type*) where mk' ::
/-- `x.coeff n` is the `n`th coefficient of the Witt vector `x`.
This concept does not have a standard name in the literature.
-/
coeff : ℕ → R
-- Porting note: added to make the `p` argument explicit
/-- Construct a Witt vector `mk p x : 𝕎 R` from a sequence `x` of elements of `R`. -/
def WittVector.mk (p : ℕ) {R : Type*} (coeff : ℕ → R) : WittVector p R := mk' coeff
variable {p : ℕ}
/- We cannot make this `localized` notation, because the `p` on the RHS doesn't occur on the left
Hiding the `p` in the notation is very convenient, so we opt for repeating the `local notation`
in other files that use Witt vectors. -/
local notation "𝕎" => WittVector p -- type as `\bbW`
namespace WittVector
variable {R : Type*}
@[ext]
theorem ext {x y : 𝕎 R} (h : ∀ n, x.coeff n = y.coeff n) : x = y := by
cases x
cases y
simp only at h
simp [funext_iff, h]
variable (p)
theorem coeff_mk (x : ℕ → R) : (mk p x).coeff = x :=
rfl
/- These instances are not needed for the rest of the development,
but it is interesting to establish early on that `WittVector p` is a lawful functor. -/
instance : Functor (WittVector p) where
map f v := mk p (f ∘ v.coeff)
mapConst a _ := mk p fun _ => a
instance : LawfulFunctor (WittVector p) where
map_const := rfl
-- Porting note: no longer needs to deconstruct `v` to conclude `{coeff := v.coeff} = v`
id_map _ := rfl
comp_map _ _ _ := rfl
variable [hp : Fact p.Prime] [CommRing R]
open MvPolynomial
section RingOperations
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `0` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZero : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 0
/-- The polynomials used for defining the element `1` of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittOne : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 0 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p 1
/-- The polynomials used for defining the addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittAdd : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 + X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNSMul (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittZSMul (n : ℤ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (n • X (0 : (Fin 1)))
/-- The polynomials used for describing the subtraction of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittSub : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 - X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the multiplication of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittMul : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 2 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 * X 1)
/-- The polynomials used for defining the negation of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittNeg : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (-X 0)
/-- The polynomials used for defining repeated addition of the ring of Witt vectors. -/
def wittPow (n : ℕ) : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin 1 × ℕ) ℤ :=
wittStructureInt p (X 0 ^ n)
variable {p}
/-- An auxiliary definition used in `WittVector.eval`.
Evaluates a polynomial whose variables come from the disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`,
with a curried evaluation `x`.
This can be defined more generally but we use only a specific instance here. -/
def peval {k : ℕ} (φ : MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → ℕ → R) : R :=
aeval (Function.uncurry x) φ
/-- Let `φ` be a family of polynomials, indexed by natural numbers, whose variables come from the
disjoint union of `k` copies of `ℕ`, and let `xᵢ` be a Witt vector for `0 ≤ i < k`.
`eval φ x` evaluates `φ` mapping the variable `X_(i, n)` to the `n`th coefficient of `xᵢ`.
Instantiating `φ` with certain polynomials defined in
`Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/StructurePolynomial.lean` establishes the
ring operations on `𝕎 R`. For example, `WittVector.wittAdd` is such a `φ` with `k = 2`;
evaluating this at `(x₀, x₁)` gives us the sum of two Witt vectors `x₀ + x₁`.
-/
def eval {k : ℕ} (φ : ℕ → MvPolynomial (Fin k × ℕ) ℤ) (x : Fin k → 𝕎 R) : 𝕎 R :=
mk p fun n => peval (φ n) fun i => (x i).coeff
instance : Zero (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittZero p) ![]⟩
instance : Inhabited (𝕎 R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance : One (𝕎 R) :=
⟨eval (wittOne p) ![]⟩
instance : Add (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittAdd p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Sub (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittSub p) ![x, y]⟩
instance hasNatScalar : SMul ℕ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittNSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance hasIntScalar : SMul ℤ (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun n x => eval (wittZSMul p n) ![x]⟩
instance : Mul (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x y => eval (wittMul p) ![x, y]⟩
instance : Neg (𝕎 R) :=
⟨fun x => eval (wittNeg p) ![x]⟩
instance hasNatPow : Pow (𝕎 R) ℕ :=
⟨fun x n => eval (wittPow p n) ![x]⟩
instance : NatCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Nat.unaryCast⟩
instance : IntCast (𝕎 R) :=
⟨Int.castDef⟩
end RingOperations
section WittStructureSimplifications
@[simp]
theorem wittZero_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : wittZero p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittZero, wittStructureRat, bind₁, aeval_zero', constantCoeff_xInTermsOfW, map_zero,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_zero_eq_one : wittOne p 0 = 1 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_one, bind₁_X_right,
map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittOne_pos_eq_zero (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : wittOne p n = 0 := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittOne, wittStructureRat, RingHom.map_zero, map_one, RingHom.map_one,
map_wittStructureInt]
induction n using Nat.strong_induction_on with | h n IH => ?_
rw [xInTermsOfW_eq]
simp only [map_mul, map_sub, map_sum, map_pow, bind₁_X_right,
bind₁_C_right]
rw [sub_mul, one_mul]
rw [Finset.sum_eq_single 0]
· simp only [invOf_eq_inv, one_mul, inv_pow, tsub_zero, RingHom.map_one, pow_zero]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, xInTermsOfW_zero, sub_self, bind₁_X_right]
· intro i hin hi0
rw [Finset.mem_range] at hin
rw [IH _ hin (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hi0), zero_pow (pow_ne_zero _ hp.1.ne_zero), mul_zero]
· rw [Finset.mem_range]; intro; contradiction
@[simp]
theorem wittAdd_zero : wittAdd p 0 = X (0, 0) + X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittAdd, wittStructureRat, map_add, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittSub_zero : wittSub p 0 = X (0, 0) - X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittSub, wittStructureRat, map_sub, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X,
wittPolynomial_zero, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittMul_zero : wittMul p 0 = X (0, 0) * X (1, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittMul, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_mul, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem wittNeg_zero : wittNeg p 0 = -X (0, 0) := by
apply MvPolynomial.map_injective (Int.castRingHom ℚ) Int.cast_injective
simp only [wittNeg, wittStructureRat, rename_X, xInTermsOfW_zero, map_X, wittPolynomial_zero,
map_neg, bind₁_X_right, map_wittStructureInt]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittAdd (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittAdd p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [add_zero, RingHom.map_add, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittSub (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittSub p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [sub_zero, RingHom.map_sub, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittMul (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittMul p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [mul_zero, RingHom.map_mul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNeg (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNeg p n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [neg_zero, RingHom.map_neg, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittNSMul (m : ℕ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittNSMul p m n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_nsmul, constantCoeff_X]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_wittZSMul (z : ℤ) (n : ℕ) : constantCoeff (wittZSMul p z n) = 0 := by
apply constantCoeff_wittStructureInt p _ _ n
simp only [smul_zero, map_zsmul, constantCoeff_X]
end WittStructureSimplifications
section Coeff
variable (R)
@[simp]
theorem zero_coeff (n : ℕ) : (0 : 𝕎 R).coeff n = 0 :=
show (aeval _ (wittZero p n) : R) = 0 by simp only [wittZero_eq_zero, map_zero]
@[simp]
theorem one_coeff_zero : (1 : 𝕎 R).coeff 0 = 1 :=
show (aeval _ (wittOne p 0) : R) = 1 by simp only [wittOne_zero_eq_one, map_one]
@[simp]
theorem one_coeff_eq_of_pos (n : ℕ) (hn : 0 < n) : coeff (1 : 𝕎 R) n = 0 :=
show (aeval _ (wittOne p n) : R) = 0 by simp only [hn, wittOne_pos_eq_zero, map_zero]
variable {p R}
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/WittVector/Defs.lean | 304 | 306 | theorem v2_coeff {p' R'} (x y : WittVector p' R') (i : Fin 2) :
(![x, y] i).coeff = ![x.coeff, y.coeff] i := by | fin_cases i <;> simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.Basic
/-!
# Rotations by oriented angles.
This file defines rotations by oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.rotation` is the rotation by an oriented angle with respect to an orientation.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "J" => o.rightAngleRotation
/-- Auxiliary construction to build a rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotationAux (θ : Real.Angle) : V →ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearMap.isometryOfInner
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id +
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
intro x y
simp only [RCLike.conj_to_real, id, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.add_apply,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv,
Orientation.areaForm_rightAngleRotation_left, Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_left,
Orientation.inner_rightAngleRotation_right, inner_add_left, inner_smul_left,
inner_add_right, inner_smul_right]
linear_combination inner (𝕜 := ℝ) x y * θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq)
@[simp]
theorem rotationAux_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotationAux θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
/-- A rotation by the oriented angle `θ`. -/
def rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V :=
LinearIsometryEquiv.ofLinearIsometry (o.rotationAux θ)
(Real.Angle.cos θ • LinearMap.id -
Real.Angle.sin θ • (LinearIsometryEquiv.toLinearEquiv J).toLinearMap)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_smul, map_sub, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply]
module
· simp)
(by
ext x
convert congr_arg (fun t : ℝ => t • x) θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq using 1
· simp only [o.rightAngleRotation_rightAngleRotation, o.rotationAux_apply,
Function.comp_apply, id, LinearEquiv.coe_coe, LinearIsometry.coe_toLinearMap,
LinearIsometryEquiv.coe_toLinearEquiv, map_add, map_smul, LinearMap.coe_comp,
LinearMap.id_coe, LinearMap.smul_apply, LinearMap.sub_apply]
module
· simp)
theorem rotation_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
o.rotation θ x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x + Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
theorem rotation_symm_apply (θ : Real.Angle) (x : V) :
(o.rotation θ).symm x = Real.Angle.cos θ • x - Real.Angle.sin θ • J x :=
rfl
theorem rotation_eq_matrix_toLin (θ : Real.Angle) {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) :
(o.rotation θ).toLinearMap =
Matrix.toLin (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx) (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx)
!![θ.cos, -θ.sin; θ.sin, θ.cos] := by
apply (o.basisRightAngleRotation x hx).ext
intro i
fin_cases i
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ]
· rw [Matrix.toLin_self]
simp [rotation_apply, Fin.sum_univ_succ, add_comm]
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear map) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) : LinearMap.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearMap = 1 := by
haveI : Nontrivial V := nontrivial_of_finrank_eq_succ (@Fact.out (finrank ℝ V = 2) _)
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ : ∃ x, x ≠ (0 : V) := exists_ne (0 : V)
rw [o.rotation_eq_matrix_toLin θ hx]
simpa [sq] using θ.cos_sq_add_sin_sq
/-- The determinant of `rotation` (as a linear equiv) is equal to `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem linearEquiv_det_rotation (θ : Real.Angle) :
LinearEquiv.det (o.rotation θ).toLinearEquiv = 1 :=
Units.ext <| by
-- Porting note: Lean can't see through `LinearEquiv.coe_det` and needed the rewrite
-- in mathlib3 this was just `units.ext <| o.det_rotation θ`
simpa only [LinearEquiv.coe_det, Units.val_one] using o.det_rotation θ
/-- The inverse of `rotation` is rotation by the negation of the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_symm (θ : Real.Angle) : (o.rotation θ).symm = o.rotation (-θ) := by
ext; simp [o.rotation_apply, o.rotation_symm_apply, sub_eq_add_neg]
/-- Rotation by 0 is the identity. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_zero : o.rotation 0 = LinearIsometryEquiv.refl ℝ V := by ext; simp [rotation]
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
@[simp]
theorem rotation_pi : o.rotation π = LinearIsometryEquiv.neg ℝ := by
ext x
simp [rotation]
/-- Rotation by π is negation. -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Rotation.lean | 134 | 135 | theorem rotation_pi_apply (x : V) : o.rotation π x = -x := by | simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Kevin Buzzard
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.WellKnown
/-!
# Bernoulli numbers
The Bernoulli numbers are a sequence of rational numbers that frequently show up in
number theory.
## Mathematical overview
The Bernoulli numbers $(B_0, B_1, B_2, \ldots)=(1, -1/2, 1/6, 0, -1/30, \ldots)$ are
a sequence of rational numbers. They show up in the formula for the sums of $k$th
powers. They are related to the Taylor series expansions of $x/\tan(x)$ and
of $\coth(x)$, and also show up in the values that the Riemann Zeta function
takes both at both negative and positive integers (and hence in the
theory of modular forms). For example, if $1 \leq n$ then
$$\zeta(2n)=\sum_{t\geq1}t^{-2n}=(-1)^{n+1}\frac{(2\pi)^{2n}B_{2n}}{2(2n)!}.$$
This result is formalised in Lean: `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`.
The Bernoulli numbers can be formally defined using the power series
$$\sum B_n\frac{t^n}{n!}=\frac{t}{1-e^{-t}}$$
although that happens to not be the definition in mathlib (this is an *implementation
detail* and need not concern the mathematician).
Note that $B_1=-1/2$, meaning that we are using the $B_n^-$ of
[from Wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_number).
## Implementation detail
The Bernoulli numbers are defined using well-founded induction, by the formula
$$B_n=1-\sum_{k\lt n}\frac{\binom{n}{k}}{n-k+1}B_k.$$
This formula is true for all $n$ and in particular $B_0=1$. Note that this is the definition
for positive Bernoulli numbers, which we call `bernoulli'`. The negative Bernoulli numbers are
then defined as `bernoulli := (-1)^n * bernoulli'`.
## Main theorems
`sum_bernoulli : ∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli k = if n = 1 then 1 else 0`
-/
open Nat Finset Finset.Nat PowerSeries
variable (A : Type*) [CommRing A] [Algebra ℚ A]
/-! ### Definitions -/
/-- The Bernoulli numbers:
the $n$-th Bernoulli number $B_n$ is defined recursively via
$$B_n = 1 - \sum_{k < n} \binom{n}{k}\frac{B_k}{n+1-k}$$ -/
def bernoulli' : ℕ → ℚ :=
WellFounded.fix Nat.lt_wfRel.wf fun n bernoulli' =>
1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k k.2
theorem bernoulli'_def' (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k : Fin n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k :=
WellFounded.fix_eq _ _ _
theorem bernoulli'_def (n : ℕ) :
bernoulli' n = 1 - ∑ k ∈ range n, n.choose k / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k := by
rw [bernoulli'_def', ← Fin.sum_univ_eq_sum_range]
theorem bernoulli'_spec (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ range n.succ, (n.choose (n - k) : ℚ) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) = 1 := by
rw [sum_range_succ_comm, bernoulli'_def n, tsub_self, choose_zero_right, sub_self, zero_add,
div_one, cast_one, one_mul, sub_add, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← sub_eq_zero, sub_sub_cancel_left,
neg_eq_zero]
exact Finset.sum_eq_zero (fun x hx => by rw [choose_symm (le_of_lt (mem_range.1 hx)), sub_self])
theorem bernoulli'_spec' (n : ℕ) :
(∑ k ∈ antidiagonal n, ((k.1 + k.2).choose k.2 : ℚ) / (k.2 + 1) * bernoulli' k.1) = 1 := by
refine ((sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ_mk _ n).trans ?_).trans (bernoulli'_spec n)
refine sum_congr rfl fun x hx => ?_
simp only [add_tsub_cancel_of_le, mem_range_succ_iff.mp hx, cast_sub]
/-! ### Examples -/
section Examples
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_zero : bernoulli' 0 = 1 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_one : bernoulli' 1 = 1 / 2 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_two : bernoulli' 2 = 1 / 6 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num [sum_range_succ, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_three : bernoulli' 3 = 0 := by
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num [sum_range_succ, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli'_four : bernoulli' 4 = -1 / 30 := by
have : Nat.choose 4 2 = 6 := by decide -- shrug
rw [bernoulli'_def]
norm_num [sum_range_succ, sum_range_succ, sum_range_zero, this]
end Examples
@[simp]
theorem sum_bernoulli' (n : ℕ) : (∑ k ∈ range n, (n.choose k : ℚ) * bernoulli' k) = n := by
cases n with | zero => simp | succ n =>
suffices
((n + 1 : ℚ) * ∑ k ∈ range n, ↑(n.choose k) / (n - k + 1) * bernoulli' k) =
∑ x ∈ range n, ↑(n.succ.choose x) * bernoulli' x by
rw_mod_cast [sum_range_succ, bernoulli'_def, ← this, choose_succ_self_right]
ring
simp_rw [mul_sum, ← mul_assoc]
refine sum_congr rfl fun k hk => ?_
congr
have : ((n - k : ℕ) : ℚ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
field_simp [← cast_sub (mem_range.1 hk).le, mul_comm]
rw_mod_cast [tsub_add_eq_add_tsub (mem_range.1 hk).le, choose_mul_succ_eq]
/-- The exponential generating function for the Bernoulli numbers `bernoulli' n`. -/
def bernoulli'PowerSeries :=
mk fun n => algebraMap ℚ A (bernoulli' n / n !)
theorem bernoulli'PowerSeries_mul_exp_sub_one :
bernoulli'PowerSeries A * (exp A - 1) = X * exp A := by
ext n
-- constant coefficient is a special case
cases n with | zero => simp | succ n =>
rw [bernoulli'PowerSeries, coeff_mul, mul_comm X, sum_antidiagonal_succ']
suffices (∑ p ∈ antidiagonal n,
bernoulli' p.1 / p.1! * ((p.2 + 1) * p.2! : ℚ)⁻¹) = (n ! : ℚ)⁻¹ by
simpa [map_sum, Nat.factorial] using congr_arg (algebraMap ℚ A) this
apply eq_inv_of_mul_eq_one_left
rw [sum_mul]
convert bernoulli'_spec' n using 1
apply sum_congr rfl
simp_rw [mem_antidiagonal]
rintro ⟨i, j⟩ rfl
have := factorial_mul_factorial_dvd_factorial_add i j
field_simp [mul_comm _ (bernoulli' i), mul_assoc, add_choose]
norm_cast
simp [mul_comm (j + 1)]
/-- Odd Bernoulli numbers (greater than 1) are zero. -/
theorem bernoulli'_odd_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (h_odd : Odd n) (hlt : 1 < n) : bernoulli' n = 0 := by
let B := mk fun n => bernoulli' n / (n ! : ℚ)
suffices (B - evalNegHom B) * (exp ℚ - 1) = X * (exp ℚ - 1) by
rcases mul_eq_mul_right_iff.mp this with h | h <;>
simp only [PowerSeries.ext_iff, evalNegHom, coeff_X] at h
· apply eq_zero_of_neg_eq
specialize h n
split_ifs at h <;> simp_all [B, h_odd.neg_one_pow, factorial_ne_zero]
· simpa +decide [Nat.factorial] using h 1
have h : B * (exp ℚ - 1) = X * exp ℚ := by
simpa [bernoulli'PowerSeries] using bernoulli'PowerSeries_mul_exp_sub_one ℚ
rw [sub_mul, h, mul_sub X, sub_right_inj, ← neg_sub, mul_neg, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg]
suffices evalNegHom (B * (exp ℚ - 1)) * exp ℚ = evalNegHom (X * exp ℚ) * exp ℚ by
simpa [mul_assoc, sub_mul, mul_comm (evalNegHom (exp ℚ)), exp_mul_exp_neg_eq_one]
congr
/-- The Bernoulli numbers are defined to be `bernoulli'` with a parity sign. -/
def bernoulli (n : ℕ) : ℚ :=
(-1) ^ n * bernoulli' n
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Bernoulli.lean | 181 | 196 | theorem bernoulli'_eq_bernoulli (n : ℕ) : bernoulli' n = (-1) ^ n * bernoulli n := by | simp [bernoulli, ← mul_assoc, ← sq, ← pow_mul, mul_comm n 2]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_zero : bernoulli 0 = 1 := by simp [bernoulli]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_one : bernoulli 1 = -1 / 2 := by norm_num [bernoulli]
theorem bernoulli_eq_bernoulli'_of_ne_one {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 1) : bernoulli n = bernoulli' n := by
by_cases h0 : n = 0; · simp [h0]
rw [bernoulli, neg_one_pow_eq_pow_mod_two]
rcases mod_two_eq_zero_or_one n with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [bernoulli'_odd_eq_zero (odd_iff.mpr h) (one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one.mpr ⟨h0, hn⟩)] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kexing Ying and Kevin Buzzard. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying, Kevin Buzzard, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Pi
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.FiniteSupport
import Mathlib.Algebra.NoZeroSMulDivisors.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Subsingleton
/-!
# Finite products and sums over types and sets
We define products and sums over types and subsets of types, with no finiteness hypotheses.
All infinite products and sums are defined to be junk values (i.e. one or zero).
This approach is sometimes easier to use than `Finset.sum`,
when issues arise with `Finset` and `Fintype` being data.
## Main definitions
We use the following variables:
* `α`, `β` - types with no structure;
* `s`, `t` - sets
* `M`, `N` - additive or multiplicative commutative monoids
* `f`, `g` - functions
Definitions in this file:
* `finsum f : M` : the sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the support of `f`, if it's finite.
Zero otherwise.
* `finprod f : M` : the product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the multiplicative support of `f`, if
it's finite. One otherwise.
## Notation
* `∑ᶠ i, f i` and `∑ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finsum f`
* `∏ᶠ i, f i` and `∏ᶠ i : α, f i` for `finprod f`
This notation works for functions `f : p → M`, where `p : Prop`, so the following works:
* `∑ᶠ i ∈ s, f i`, where `f : α → M`, `s : Set α` : sum over the set `s`;
* `∑ᶠ n < 5, f n`, where `f : ℕ → M` : same as `f 0 + f 1 + f 2 + f 3 + f 4`;
* `∏ᶠ (n >= -2) (hn : n < 3), f n`, where `f : ℤ → M` : same as `f (-2) * f (-1) * f 0 * f 1 * f 2`.
## Implementation notes
`finsum` and `finprod` is "yet another way of doing finite sums and products in Lean". However
experiments in the wild (e.g. with matroids) indicate that it is a helpful approach in settings
where the user is not interested in computability and wants to do reasoning without running into
typeclass diamonds caused by the constructive finiteness used in definitions such as `Finset` and
`Fintype`. By sticking solely to `Set.Finite` we avoid these problems. We are aware that there are
other solutions but for beginner mathematicians this approach is easier in practice.
Another application is the construction of a partition of unity from a collection of “bump”
function. In this case the finite set depends on the point and it's convenient to have a definition
that does not mention the set explicitly.
The first arguments in all definitions and lemmas is the codomain of the function of the big
operator. This is necessary for the heuristic in `@[to_additive]`.
See the documentation of `to_additive.attr` for more information.
We did not add `IsFinite (X : Type) : Prop`, because it is simply `Nonempty (Fintype X)`.
## Tags
finsum, finprod, finite sum, finite product
-/
open Function Set
/-!
### Definition and relation to `Finset.sum` and `Finset.prod`
-/
-- Porting note: Used to be section Sort
section sort
variable {G M N : Type*} {α β ι : Sort*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
section
/- Note: we use classical logic only for these definitions, to ensure that we do not write lemmas
with `Classical.dec` in their statement. -/
open Classical in
/-- Sum of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the support of `f`, if it's finite. Zero
otherwise. -/
noncomputable irreducible_def finsum (lemma := finsum_def') [AddCommMonoid M] (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (support (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∑ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 0
open Classical in
/-- Product of `f x` as `x` ranges over the elements of the multiplicative support of `f`, if it's
finite. One otherwise. -/
@[to_additive existing]
noncomputable irreducible_def finprod (lemma := finprod_def') (f : α → M) : M :=
if h : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i.down else 1
attribute [to_additive existing] finprod_def'
end
open Batteries.ExtendedBinder
/-- `∑ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finsum f`. It is the sum of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
support of `f`, if it's finite, zero otherwise. Taking the sum over multiple arguments or
conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∑ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finsum f) => r
/-- `∏ᶠ x, f x` is notation for `finprod f`. It is the product of `f x`, where `x` ranges over the
multiplicative support of `f`, if it's finite, one otherwise. Taking the product over multiple
arguments or conditions is possible, e.g. `∏ᶠ (x) (y), f x y` and `∏ᶠ (x) (h: x ∈ s), f x` -/
notation3"∏ᶠ "(...)", "r:67:(scoped f => finprod f) => r
-- Porting note: The following ports the lean3 notation for this file, but is currently very fickle.
-- syntax (name := bigfinsum) "∑ᶠ" extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinsum)
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finsum (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun ($x) => finsum (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∑ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finsum fun $x => (finsum fun $y => (finsum fun $z => (finsum (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
--
--
-- syntax (name := bigfinprod) "∏ᶠ " extBinders ", " term:67 : term
-- macro_rules (kind := bigfinprod)
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident : $t, $p) => `(finprod (fun $x:ident : $t ↦ $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ $x:ident $b:binderPred, $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod (α := satisfies_binder_pred% $x $b) (fun _ => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident : $_) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun ($x) => finprod (α := $t) (fun $h => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => $p))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z => $p)))
-- | `(∏ᶠ ($x:ident) ($y:ident) ($z:ident) ($h:ident : $t), $p) =>
-- `(finprod fun $x => (finprod fun $y => (finprod fun $z =>
-- (finprod (α := $t) fun $h => $p))))
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset {f : α → M}
(hf : (mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down)).Finite) {s : Finset (PLift α)} (hs : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down := by
rw [finprod, dif_pos]
refine Finset.prod_subset hs fun x _ hxf => ?_
rwa [hf.mem_toFinset, nmem_mulSupport] at hxf
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset {f : α → M} {s : Finset (PLift α)}
(hs : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i.down :=
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (s.finite_toSet.subset hs) fun x hx => by
rw [Finite.mem_toFinset] at hx
exact hs hx
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_one : (∏ᶠ _ : α, (1 : M)) = 1 := by
have : (mulSupport fun x : PLift α => (fun _ => 1 : α → M) x.down) ⊆ (∅ : Finset (PLift α)) :=
fun x h => by simp at h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_empty]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_one]
congr
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_false (f : False → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 :=
finprod_of_isEmpty _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_single (f : α → M) (a : α) (ha : ∀ x, x ≠ a → f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ x, f x = f a := by
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ ({PLift.up a} : Finset (PLift α)) := by
intro x
contrapose
simpa [PLift.eq_up_iff_down_eq] using ha x.down
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this, Finset.prod_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_unique [Unique α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f default :=
finprod_eq_single f default fun _x hx => (hx <| Unique.eq_default _).elim
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_true (f : True → M) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = f trivial :=
@finprod_unique M True _ ⟨⟨trivial⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩ f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (f : p → M) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = if h : p then f h else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· haveI : Unique p := ⟨⟨h⟩, fun _ => rfl⟩
exact finprod_unique f
· haveI : IsEmpty p := ⟨h⟩
exact finprod_of_isEmpty f
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] {x : M} : ∏ᶠ _ : p, x = if p then x else 1 :=
finprod_eq_dif fun _ => x
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_congr {f g : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : finprod f = finprod g :=
congr_arg _ <| funext h
@[to_additive (attr := congr)]
theorem finprod_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f : p → M} {g : q → M} (hpq : p = q)
(hfg : ∀ h : q, f (hpq.mpr h) = g h) : finprod f = finprod g := by
subst q
exact finprod_congr hfg
/-- To prove a property of a finite product, it suffices to prove that the property is
multiplicative and holds on the factors. -/
@[to_additive
"To prove a property of a finite sum, it suffices to prove that the property is
additive and holds on the summands."]
theorem finprod_induction {f : α → M} (p : M → Prop) (hp₀ : p 1)
(hp₁ : ∀ x y, p x → p y → p (x * y)) (hp₂ : ∀ i, p (f i)) : p (∏ᶠ i, f i) := by
rw [finprod]
split_ifs
exacts [Finset.prod_induction _ _ hp₁ hp₀ fun i _ => hp₂ _, hp₀]
theorem finprod_nonneg {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [PartialOrder R] [IsOrderedRing R]
{f : α → R} (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) :
0 ≤ ∏ᶠ x, f x :=
finprod_induction (fun x => 0 ≤ x) zero_le_one (fun _ _ => mul_nonneg) hf
@[to_additive finsum_nonneg]
theorem one_le_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedMonoid M]
{f : α → M} (hf : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) :
1 ≤ ∏ᶠ i, f i :=
finprod_induction _ le_rfl (fun _ _ => one_le_mul) hf
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_plift (f : M →* N) (g : α → M)
(h : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite) : f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) := by
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset h.coe_toFinset.ge,
finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset, map_prod]
rw [h.coe_toFinset]
exact mulSupport_comp_subset f.map_one (g ∘ PLift.down)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_Prop {p : Prop} (f : M →* N) (g : p → M) :
f (∏ᶠ x, g x) = ∏ᶠ x, f (g x) :=
f.map_finprod_plift g (Set.toFinite _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (f : M →* N) (hf : ∀ x, f x = 1 → x = 1) (g : α → M) :
f (∏ᶠ i, g i) = ∏ᶠ i, f (g i) := by
by_cases hg : (mulSupport <| g ∘ PLift.down).Finite; · exact f.map_finprod_plift g hg
rw [finprod, dif_neg, f.map_one, finprod, dif_neg]
exacts [Infinite.mono (fun x hx => mt (hf (g x.down)) hx) hg, hg]
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (g : M →* N) (hg : Injective g) (f : α → M) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_of_preimage_one (fun _ => (hg.eq_iff' g.map_one).mp) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquiv.map_finprod (g : M ≃* N) (f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.toMonoidHom.map_finprod_of_injective (EquivLike.injective g) f
@[to_additive]
theorem MulEquivClass.map_finprod {F : Type*} [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (g : F)
(f : α → M) : g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
MulEquiv.map_finprod (MulEquivClass.toMulEquiv g) f
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `finsum_smul'`. -/
theorem finsum_smul {R M : Type*} [Ring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [NoZeroSMulDivisors R M]
(f : ι → R) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x := by
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx)
· simp
· exact ((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_left_injective R hx) _
/-- The `NoZeroSMulDivisors` makes sure that the result holds even when the support of `f` is
infinite. For a more usual version assuming `(support f).Finite` instead, see `smul_finsum'`. -/
theorem smul_finsum {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R M] (c : R) (f : ι → M) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i := by
rcases eq_or_ne c 0 with (rfl | hc)
· simp
· exact (smulAddHom R M c).map_finsum_of_injective (smul_right_injective M hc) _
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_inv_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] (f : α → G) : (∏ᶠ x, (f x)⁻¹) = (∏ᶠ x, f x)⁻¹ :=
((MulEquiv.inv G).map_finprod f).symm
end sort
-- Porting note: Used to be section Type
section type
variable {α β ι G M N : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [CommMonoid N]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply (s : Set α) (f : α → M) (a : α) :
∏ᶠ _ : a ∈ s, f a = mulIndicator s f a := by
classical convert finprod_eq_if (M := M) (p := a ∈ s) (x := f a)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem finprod_apply_ne_one (f : α → M) (a : α) : ∏ᶠ _ : f a ≠ 1, f a = f a := by
rw [← mem_mulSupport, finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_def (s : Set α) (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ s, f a = ∏ᶠ a, mulIndicator s f a :=
finprod_congr <| finprod_eq_mulIndicator_apply s f
@[to_additive]
lemma finprod_mem_mulSupport (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ a ∈ mulSupport f, f a = ∏ᶠ a, f a := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α} (h : mulSupport f ⊆ s) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i := by
have A : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) = Equiv.plift.symm '' mulSupport f := by
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact (Equiv.plift.symm.image_eq_preimage _).symm
have : mulSupport (f ∘ PLift.down) ⊆ s.map Equiv.plift.symm.toEmbedding := by
rw [A, Finset.coe_map]
exact image_subset _ h
rw [finprod_eq_prod_plift_of_mulSupport_subset this]
simp only [Finset.prod_map, Equiv.coe_toEmbedding]
congr
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
{s : Finset α} (h : hf.toFinset ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ fun _ hx => h <| hf.mem_toFinset.2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_finset_prod_of_mulSupport_subset (f : α → M) {s : Finset α}
(h : mulSupport f ⊆ (s : Set α)) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
haveI h' : (s.finite_toSet.subset h).toFinset ⊆ s := by
simpa [← Finset.coe_subset, Set.coe_toFinset]
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ _ h'
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_def (f : α → M) [Decidable (mulSupport f).Finite] :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = if h : (mulSupport f).Finite then ∏ i ∈ h.toFinset, f i else 1 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ h (Finset.Subset.refl _)
· rw [finprod, dif_neg]
rw [mulSupport_comp_eq_preimage]
exact mt (fun hf => hf.of_preimage Equiv.plift.surjective) h
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport {f : α → M} (hf : (mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_neg hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod (f : α → M) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i := by classical rw [finprod_def, dif_pos hf]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype [Fintype α] (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i : α, f i = ∏ i, f i :=
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset _ (Set.toFinite _) <| Finset.subset_univ _
@[to_additive]
theorem map_finset_prod {α F : Type*} [Fintype α] [EquivLike F M N] [MulEquivClass F M N] (f : F)
(g : α → M) : f (∏ i : α, g i) = ∏ i : α, f (g i) := by
simp [← finprod_eq_prod_of_fintype, MulEquivClass.map_finprod]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff (f : α → M) {p : α → Prop} {t : Finset α}
(h : ∀ {x}, f x ≠ 1 → (p x ↔ x ∈ t)) : (∏ᶠ (i) (_ : p i), f i) = ∏ i ∈ t, f i := by
set s := { x | p x }
change ∏ᶠ (i : α) (_ : i ∈ s), f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i
have : mulSupport (s.mulIndicator f) ⊆ t := by
rw [Set.mulSupport_mulIndicator]
intro x hx
exact (h hx.2).1 hx.1
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ this]
refine Finset.prod_congr rfl fun x hx => mulIndicator_apply_eq_self.2 fun hxs => ?_
contrapose! hxs
exact (h hxs).2 hx
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_cond_ne (f : α → M) (a : α) [DecidableEq α] (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
(∏ᶠ (i) (_ : i ≠ a), f i) = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset.erase a, f i := by
apply finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff
intro x hx
rw [Finset.mem_erase, Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport]
exact ⟨fun h => And.intro h hx, fun h => h.1⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t.toSet ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ <| by
intro x hxf
rw [← mem_mulSupport] at hxf
refine ⟨fun hx => ?_, fun hx => ?_⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x t (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [← Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
· refine ((mem_inter_iff x s (mulSupport f)).mp ?_).1
rw [Set.ext_iff.mp h x, mem_inter_iff]
exact ⟨hx, hxf⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_subset (f : α → M) {s : Set α} {t : Finset α}
(h₁ : s ∩ mulSupport f ⊆ t) (h₂ : ↑t ⊆ s) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ t, f i :=
finprod_cond_eq_prod_of_cond_iff _ fun hx => ⟨fun h => h₁ ⟨h, hx⟩, fun h => h₂ h⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp [inter_assoc]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_prod_filter (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)]
(hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hf.toFinset with i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by
ext x
simp [and_comm]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by simp_rw [coe_toFinset s]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_finite_toFinset_prod (f : α → M) {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ hs.toFinset, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ <| by rw [hs.coe_toFinset]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_finset_eq_prod (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_coe_finset (f : α → M) (s : Finset α) :
(∏ᶠ i ∈ (s : Set α), f i) = ∏ i ∈ s, f i :=
finprod_mem_eq_prod_of_inter_mulSupport_eq _ rfl
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_infinite {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (hs : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Infinite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [finprod_mem_def]
apply finprod_of_infinite_mulSupport
rwa [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hs
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} {s : Set α} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x = 1) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport (f : α → M) (s : Set α) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s ∩ mulSupport f, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i := by
rw [finprod_mem_def, finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : s ∩ mulSupport f = t ∩ mulSupport f) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
rw [← finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport, h, finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport]
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq' (f : α → M) (s t : Set α)
(h : ∀ x ∈ mulSupport f, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, f i := by
apply finprod_mem_inter_mulSupport_eq
ext x
exact and_congr_left (h x)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_univ (f : α → M) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ @Set.univ α, f i = ∏ᶠ i : α, f i :=
finprod_congr fun _ => finprod_true _
variable {f g : α → M} {a b : α} {s t : Set α}
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_mem_congr (h₀ : s = t) (h₁ : ∀ x ∈ t, f x = g x) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = ∏ᶠ i ∈ t, g i :=
h₀.symm ▸ finprod_congr fun i => finprod_congr_Prop rfl (h₁ i)
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_eq_one_of_forall_eq_one {f : α → M} (h : ∀ x, f x = 1) : ∏ᶠ i, f i = 1 := by
simp +contextual [h]
@[to_additive finsum_pos']
theorem one_lt_finprod' {M : Type*} [CommMonoid M] [PartialOrder M] [IsOrderedCancelMonoid M]
{f : ι → M}
(h : ∀ i, 1 ≤ f i) (h' : ∃ i, 1 < f i) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) : 1 < ∏ᶠ i, f i := by
rcases h' with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [finprod_eq_prod _ hf]
refine Finset.one_lt_prod' (fun i _ ↦ h i) ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
simpa only [Finite.mem_toFinset, mem_mulSupport] using ne_of_gt hi
/-!
### Distributivity w.r.t. addition, subtraction, and (scalar) multiplication
-/
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i * g i` equals
the product of `f i` multiplied by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i + g i`
equals the sum of `f i` plus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_mul_distrib (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) * ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
classical
rw [finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset f hf Finset.subset_union_left,
finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_toFinset_subset g hg Finset.subset_union_right, ←
Finset.prod_mul_distrib]
refine finprod_eq_prod_of_mulSupport_subset _ ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_union, Finite.coe_toFinset, mulSupport_subset_iff,
mem_union, mem_mulSupport]
intro x
contrapose!
rintro ⟨hf, hg⟩
simp [hf, hg]
/-- If the multiplicative supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the product of `f i / g i`
equals the product of `f i` divided by the product of `g i`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the additive supports of `f` and `g` are finite, then the sum of `f i - g i`
equals the sum of `f i` minus the sum of `g i`."]
theorem finprod_div_distrib [DivisionCommMonoid G] {f g : α → G} (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite)
(hg : (mulSupport g).Finite) : ∏ᶠ i, f i / g i = (∏ᶠ i, f i) / ∏ᶠ i, g i := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv, finprod_mul_distrib hf ((mulSupport_inv g).symm.rec hg),
finprod_inv_distrib]
/-- A more general version of `finprod_mem_mul_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` and
`s ∩ mulSupport g` rather than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `finsum_mem_add_distrib` that only requires `s ∩ support f`
and `s ∩ support g` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hf : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) (hg : (s ∩ mulSupport g).Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i := by
rw [← mulSupport_mulIndicator] at hf hg
simp only [finprod_mem_def, mulIndicator_mul, finprod_mul_distrib hf hg]
/-- The product of the constant function `1` over any set equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive "The sum of the constant function `0` over any set equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_one (s : Set α) : (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, (1 : M)) = 1 := by simp
/-- If a function `f` equals `1` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` equals `1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If a function `f` equals `0` on a set `s`, then the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s`
equals `0`."]
theorem finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one (hf : s.EqOn f 1) : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i = 1 := by
rw [← finprod_mem_one s]
exact finprod_mem_congr rfl hf
/-- If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `1`, then there is some `x ∈ s` such that
`f x ≠ 1`. -/
@[to_additive
"If the product of `f i` over `i ∈ s` is not equal to `0`, then there is some `x ∈ s`
such that `f x ≠ 0`."]
theorem exists_ne_one_of_finprod_mem_ne_one (h : ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i ≠ 1) : ∃ x ∈ s, f x ≠ 1 := by
by_contra! h'
exact h (finprod_mem_of_eqOn_one h')
/-- Given a finite set `s`, the product of `f i * g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the product of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` times the product of `g i` over `i ∈ s`. -/
@[to_additive
"Given a finite set `s`, the sum of `f i + g i` over `i ∈ s` equals the sum of `f i`
over `i ∈ s` plus the sum of `g i` over `i ∈ s`."]
theorem finprod_mem_mul_distrib (hs : s.Finite) :
∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i * g i = (∏ᶠ i ∈ s, f i) * ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g i :=
finprod_mem_mul_distrib' (hs.inter_of_left _) (hs.inter_of_left _)
@[to_additive]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ i, f i) = ∏ᶠ i, g (f i) :=
g.map_finprod_plift f <| hf.preimage Equiv.plift.injective.injOn
@[to_additive]
theorem finprod_pow (hf : (mulSupport f).Finite) (n : ℕ) : (∏ᶠ i, f i) ^ n = ∏ᶠ i, f i ^ n :=
(powMonoidHom n).map_finprod hf
/-- See also `finsum_smul` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
theorem finsum_smul' {R M : Type*} [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f : ι → R}
(hf : (support f).Finite) (x : M) : (∑ᶠ i, f i) • x = ∑ᶠ i, f i • x :=
((smulAddHom R M).flip x).map_finsum hf
/-- See also `smul_finsum` for a version that works even when the support of `f` is not finite,
but with slightly stronger typeclass requirements. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/BigOperators/Finprod.lean | 608 | 620 | theorem smul_finsum' {R M : Type*} [Monoid R] [AddCommMonoid M] [DistribMulAction R M] (c : R)
{f : ι → M} (hf : (support f).Finite) : (c • ∑ᶠ i, f i) = ∑ᶠ i, c • f i :=
(DistribMulAction.toAddMonoidHom M c).map_finsum hf
/-- A more general version of `MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem` that requires `s ∩ mulSupport f` rather
than `s` to be finite. -/
@[to_additive
"A more general version of `AddMonoidHom.map_finsum_mem` that requires
`s ∩ support f` rather than `s` to be finite."]
theorem MonoidHom.map_finprod_mem' {f : α → M} (g : M →* N) (h₀ : (s ∩ mulSupport f).Finite) :
g (∏ᶠ j ∈ s, f j) = ∏ᶠ i ∈ s, g (f i) := by | rw [g.map_finprod]
· simp only [g.map_finprod_Prop] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Connectivity of subgraphs and induced graphs
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Preconnected` and `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected` give subgraphs
connectivity predicates via `SimpleGraph.subgraph.coe`.
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
/-- A subgraph is preconnected if it is preconnected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
/-- A subgraph is connected if it is connected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
protected lemma Connected.preconnected {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.Preconnected := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.1
protected lemma Connected.nonempty {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.2
theorem singletonSubgraph_connected {v : V} : (G.singletonSubgraph v).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
subst_vars
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_connected {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
obtain rfl | rfl := ha <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hb <;>
first | rfl | (apply Adj.reachable; simp)
lemma top_induce_pair_connected_of_adj {u v : V} (huv : G.Adj u v) :
((⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {u, v}).Connected := by
rw [← subgraphOfAdj_eq_induce huv]
exact subgraphOfAdj_connected huv
@[mono]
protected lemma Connected.mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (hle : H ≤ H') (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
rw [← Subgraph.copy_eq H' H.verts hv H'.Adj rfl]
refine ⟨h.coe.mono ?_⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ hvw
exact hle.2 hvw
protected lemma Connected.mono' {H H' : G.Subgraph}
(hle : ∀ v w, H.Adj v w → H'.Adj v w) (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
exact h.mono ⟨hv.le, hle⟩ hv
protected lemma Connected.sup {H K : G.Subgraph}
(hH : H.Connected) (hK : K.Connected) (hn : (H ⊓ K).verts.Nonempty) :
(H ⊔ K).Connected := by
rw [Subgraph.connected_iff', connected_iff_exists_forall_reachable]
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := hn
exists ⟨u, Or.inl hu⟩
rintro ⟨v, (hv|hv)⟩
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_left : H ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hH ⟨u, hu⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_right : K ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hK ⟨u, hu'⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
/--
This lemma establishes a condition under which a subgraph is the same as a connected component.
Note the asymmetry in the hypothesis `h`: `v` is in `H.verts`, but `w` is not required to be.
-/
lemma Connected.exists_verts_eq_connectedComponentSupp {H : Subgraph G}
(hc : H.Connected) (h : ∀ v ∈ H.verts, ∀ w, G.Adj v w → H.Adj v w) :
∃ c : G.ConnectedComponent, H.verts = c.supp := by
rw [SimpleGraph.ConnectedComponent.exists]
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hc.nonempty
use v
ext w
simp only [ConnectedComponent.mem_supp_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact ⟨fun hw ↦ by simpa using (hc ⟨w, hw⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩).map H.hom,
fun a ↦ a.symm.mem_subgraphVerts h hv⟩
end Subgraph
/-! ### Walks as subgraphs -/
namespace Walk
variable {u v w : V}
/-- The subgraph consisting of the vertices and edges of the walk. -/
@[simp]
protected def toSubgraph {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Subgraph
| nil => G.singletonSubgraph u
| cons h p => G.subgraphOfAdj h ⊔ p.toSubgraph
theorem toSubgraph_cons_nil_eq_subgraphOfAdj (h : G.Adj u v) :
(cons h nil).toSubgraph = G.subgraphOfAdj h := by simp
theorem mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : w ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts ↔ w ∈ p.support := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons h p' ih =>
rename_i x y z
have : w = y ∨ w ∈ p'.support ↔ w ∈ p'.support :=
⟨by rintro (rfl | h) <;> simp [*], by simp +contextual⟩
simp [ih, or_assoc, this]
lemma not_nil_of_adj_toSubgraph {u v} {x : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hadj : p.toSubgraph.Adj w x) :
¬p.Nil := by
cases p <;> simp_all
lemma start_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
lemma end_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
@[simp]
theorem verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.verts = { w | w ∈ p.support } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_verts_toSubgraph
theorem mem_edges_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) {e : Sym2 V} :
e ∈ p.toSubgraph.edgeSet ↔ e ∈ p.edges := by induction p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.edgeSet = { e | e ∈ p.edges } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_edges_toSubgraph
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_append (p : G.Walk u v) (q : G.Walk v w) :
(p.append q).toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph ⊔ q.toSubgraph := by induction p <;> simp [*, sup_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_reverse (p : G.Walk u v) : p.reverse.toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ _ =>
simp only [*, Walk.toSubgraph, reverse_cons, toSubgraph_append, subgraphOfAdj_symm]
rw [sup_comm]
congr
ext <;> simp [-Set.bot_eq_empty]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 184 | 196 | theorem toSubgraph_rotate [DecidableEq V] (c : G.Walk v v) (h : u ∈ c.support) :
(c.rotate h).toSubgraph = c.toSubgraph := by | rw [rotate, toSubgraph_append, sup_comm, ← toSubgraph_append, take_spec]
@[simp]
theorem toSubgraph_map (f : G →g G') (p : G.Walk u v) :
(p.map f).toSubgraph = p.toSubgraph.map f := by induction p <;> simp [*, Subgraph.map_sup]
lemma adj_toSubgraph_mapLe {G' : SimpleGraph V} {w x : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (h : G ≤ G') :
(p.mapLe h).toSubgraph.Adj w x ↔ p.toSubgraph.Adj w x := by
simp only [toSubgraph_map, Subgraph.map_adj]
nth_rewrite 1 [← Hom.ofLE_apply h w, ← Hom.ofLE_apply h x]
simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_five : cos (π / 5) = (1 + √5) / 4 := by
set c := cos (π / 5)
have : 4 * (c * c) + (-2) * c + (-1) = 0 := by
rw [← sq, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
have hd : discrim 4 (-2) (-1) = (2 * √5) * (2 * √5) := by norm_num [discrim, mul_mul_mul_comm]
rcases (quadratic_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num) hd c).mp this with h | h
· field_simp [h]; linarith
· absurd (show 0 ≤ c from cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos.le])
rw [not_le, h]
exact div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (by norm_num [lt_sqrt]) (by positivity)
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff₀ (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_pos zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end Real
namespace Complex
open Real
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc
cos (π / 2) = Real.cos (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_cos]; simp
_ = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc
sin (π / 2) = Real.sin (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_sin]; simp
_ = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin, Real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by rw [← ofReal_cos, Real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 1,118 | 1,120 | theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by | simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
/-!
# Filters with countable intersections and countable separating families
In this file we prove some facts about a filter with countable intersections property on a type with
a countable family of sets that separates points of the space. The main use case is the
`MeasureTheory.ae` filter and a space with countably generated σ-algebra but lemmas apply,
e.g., to the `residual` filter and a T₀ topological space with second countable topology.
To avoid repetition of lemmas for different families of separating sets (measurable sets, open sets,
closed sets), all theorems in this file take a predicate `p : Set α → Prop` as an argument and prove
existence of a countable separating family satisfying this predicate by searching for a
`HasCountableSeparatingOn` typeclass instance.
## Main definitions
- `HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t`: a typeclass saying that there exists a countable set family
`S : Set (Set α)` such that all `s ∈ S` satisfy the predicate `p` and any two distinct points
`x y ∈ t`, `x ≠ y`, can be separated by a set `s ∈ S`. For technical reasons, we formulate the
latter property as "for all `x y ∈ t`, if `x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s` for all `s ∈ S`, then `x = y`".
This typeclass is used in all lemmas in this file to avoid repeating them for open sets, closed
sets, and measurable sets.
### Main results
#### Filters supported on a (sub)singleton
Let `l : Filter α` be a filter with countable intersections property. Let `p : Set α → Prop` be a
property such that there exists a countable family of sets satisfying `p` and separating points of
`α`. Then `l` is supported on a subsingleton: there exists a subsingleton `t` such that
`t ∈ l`.
We formalize various versions of this theorem in
`Filter.exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating`, and
`Filter.exists_singleton_mem_of_forall_separating`.
#### Eventually constant functions
Consider a function `f : α → β`, a filter `l` with countable intersections property, and a countable
separating family of sets of `β`. Suppose that for every `U` from the family, either
`∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U` or `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U`. Then `f` is eventually constant along `l`.
We formalize three versions of this theorem in
`Filter.exists_mem_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating`,
`Filter.exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating`, and
`Filer.exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_forall_separating`.
#### Eventually equal functions
Two functions are equal along a filter with countable intersections property if the preimages of all
sets from a countable separating family of sets are equal along the filter.
We formalize several versions of this theorem in
`Filter.of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating_mem_iff`, `Filter.of_forall_separating_mem_iff`,
`Filter.of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating_preimage`, and
`Filter.of_forall_separating_preimage`.
## Keywords
filter, countable
-/
open Function Set Filter
/-- We say that a type `α` has a *countable separating family of sets* satisfying a predicate
`p : Set α → Prop` on a set `t` if there exists a countable family of sets `S : Set (Set α)` such
that all sets `s ∈ S` satisfy `p` and any two distinct points `x y ∈ t`, `x ≠ y`, can be separated
by `s ∈ S`: there exists `s ∈ S` such that exactly one of `x` and `y` belongs to `s`.
E.g., if `α` is a `T₀` topological space with second countable topology, then it has a countable
separating family of open sets and a countable separating family of closed sets.
-/
class HasCountableSeparatingOn (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α) : Prop where
exists_countable_separating : ∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y
theorem exists_countable_separating (α : Type*) (p : Set α → Prop) (t : Set α)
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
h.1
theorem exists_nonempty_countable_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀)
(t : Set α) [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : Set (Set α), S.Nonempty ∧ S.Countable ∧ (∀ s ∈ S, p s) ∧
∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ s ∈ S, x ∈ s ↔ y ∈ s) → x = y :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := exists_countable_separating α p t
⟨insert s₀ S, insert_nonempty _ _, hSc.insert _, forall_insert_of_forall hSp hp,
fun x hx y hy hxy ↦ hSt x hx y hy <| forall_of_forall_insert hxy⟩
theorem exists_seq_separating (α : Type*) {p : Set α → Prop} {s₀} (hp : p s₀) (t : Set α)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t] :
∃ S : ℕ → Set α, (∀ n, p (S n)) ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, ∀ y ∈ t, (∀ n, x ∈ S n ↔ y ∈ S n) → x = y := by
rcases exists_nonempty_countable_separating α hp t with ⟨S, hSne, hSc, hS⟩
rcases hSc.exists_eq_range hSne with ⟨S, rfl⟩
use S
simpa only [forall_mem_range] using hS
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.mono {α} {p₁ p₂ : Set α → Prop} {t₁ t₂ : Set α}
[h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₁ t₁] (hp : ∀ s, p₁ s → p₂ s) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) :
HasCountableSeparatingOn α p₂ t₂ where
exists_countable_separating :=
let ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hSt⟩ := h.1
⟨S, hSc, fun s hs ↦ hp s (hSp s hs), fun x hx y hy ↦ hSt x (ht hx) y (ht hy)⟩
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.of_subtype {α : Type*} {p : Set α → Prop} {t : Set α}
{q : Set t → Prop} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn t q univ]
(hpq : ∀ U, q U → ∃ V, p V ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' V = U) : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t := by
rcases h.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSq, hS⟩
choose! V hpV hV using fun s hs ↦ hpq s (hSq s hs)
refine ⟨⟨V '' S, hSc.image _, forall_mem_image.2 hpV, fun x hx y hy h ↦ ?_⟩⟩
refine congr_arg Subtype.val (hS ⟨x, hx⟩ trivial ⟨y, hy⟩ trivial fun U hU ↦ ?_)
rw [← hV U hU]
exact h _ (mem_image_of_mem _ hU)
theorem HasCountableSeparatingOn.subtype_iff {α : Type*} {p : Set α → Prop} {t : Set α} :
HasCountableSeparatingOn t (fun u ↦ ∃ v, p v ∧ (↑) ⁻¹' v = u) univ ↔
HasCountableSeparatingOn α p t := by
constructor <;> intro h
· exact h.of_subtype <| fun s ↦ id
rcases h with ⟨S, Sct, Sp, hS⟩
use {Subtype.val ⁻¹' s | s ∈ S}, Sct.image _, ?_, ?_
· rintro u ⟨t, tS, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, Sp _ tS, rfl⟩
rintro x - y - hxy
exact Subtype.val_injective <| hS _ (Subtype.coe_prop _) _ (Subtype.coe_prop _)
fun s hs ↦ hxy (Subtype.val ⁻¹' s) ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
namespace Filter
variable {α β : Type*} {l : Filter α} [CountableInterFilter l] {f g : α → β}
/-!
### Filters supported on a (sub)singleton
In this section we prove several versions of the following theorem. Let `l : Filter α` be a filter
with countable intersections property. Let `p : Set α → Prop` be a property such that there exists a
countable family of sets satisfying `p` and separating points of `α`. Then `l` is supported on
a subsingleton: there exists a subsingleton `t` such that `t ∈ l`.
With extra `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions one can ensure that `t` is a singleton `{x}`.
If `s ∈ l`, then it suffices to assume that the countable family separates only points of `s`.
-/
theorem exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [h : HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l)
(hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.Subsingleton ∧ t ∈ l := by
rcases h.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hS⟩
refine ⟨s ∩ ⋂₀ (S ∩ l.sets) ∩ ⋂ (U ∈ S) (_ : Uᶜ ∈ l), Uᶜ, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact fun _ h ↦ h.1.1
· intro x hx y hy
simp only [mem_sInter, mem_inter_iff, mem_iInter, mem_compl_iff] at hx hy
refine hS x hx.1.1 y hy.1.1 (fun s hsS ↦ ?_)
cases hl s (hSp s hsS) with
| inl hsl => simp only [hx.1.2 s ⟨hsS, hsl⟩, hy.1.2 s ⟨hsS, hsl⟩]
| inr hsl => simp only [hx.2 s hsS hsl, hy.2 s hsS hsl]
· exact inter_mem
(inter_mem hs ((countable_sInter_mem (hSc.mono inter_subset_left)).2 fun _ h ↦ h.2))
((countable_bInter_mem hSc).2 fun U hU ↦ iInter_mem'.2 id)
theorem exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) : ∃ a ∈ s, {a} ∈ l := by
rcases exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating p hs hl with ⟨t, hts, ht, htl⟩
rcases ht.eq_empty_or_singleton with rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩
· exact hne.imp fun a ha ↦ ⟨ha, mem_of_superset htl (empty_subset _)⟩
· exact ⟨x, hts rfl, htl⟩
theorem exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating [Nonempty α] (p : Set α → Prop)
{s : Set α} [HasCountableSeparatingOn α p s] (hs : s ∈ l) (hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) :
∃ a, {a} ∈ l := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact ‹Nonempty α›.elim fun a ↦ ⟨a, mem_of_superset hs (empty_subset _)⟩
· exact (exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating p hs hne hl).imp fun _ ↦
And.right
theorem exists_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating (p : Set α → Prop)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn α p univ] (hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) :
∃ s : Set α, s.Subsingleton ∧ s ∈ l :=
let ⟨t, _, hts, htl⟩ := exists_subset_subsingleton_mem_of_forall_separating p univ_mem hl
⟨t, hts, htl⟩
theorem exists_singleton_mem_of_forall_separating [Nonempty α] (p : Set α → Prop)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn α p univ] (hl : ∀ U, p U → U ∈ l ∨ Uᶜ ∈ l) :
∃ x : α, {x} ∈ l :=
exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating p univ_mem hl
/-!
### Eventually constant functions
In this section we apply theorems from the previous section to the filter `Filter.map f l` to show
that `f : α → β` is eventually constant along `l` if for every `U` from the separating family,
either `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U` or `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U`.
-/
theorem exists_mem_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating (p : Set β → Prop)
{s : Set β} [HasCountableSeparatingOn β p s] (hs : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (hne : s.Nonempty)
(h : ∀ U, p U → (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U)) :
∃ a ∈ s, f =ᶠ[l] const α a :=
exists_mem_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_nonempty_of_forall_separating p (l := map f l) hs hne h
theorem exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating [Nonempty β]
(p : Set β → Prop) {s : Set β} [HasCountableSeparatingOn β p s] (hs : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s)
(h : ∀ U, p U → (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U)) :
∃ a, f =ᶠ[l] const α a :=
exists_singleton_mem_of_mem_of_forall_separating (l := map f l) p hs h
theorem exists_eventuallyEq_const_of_forall_separating [Nonempty β] (p : Set β → Prop)
[HasCountableSeparatingOn β p univ]
(h : ∀ U, p U → (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U) ∨ (∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∉ U)) :
∃ a, f =ᶠ[l] const α a :=
exists_singleton_mem_of_forall_separating (l := map f l) p h
namespace EventuallyEq
/-!
### Eventually equal functions
In this section we show that two functions are equal along a filter with countable intersections
property if the preimages of all sets from a countable separating family of sets are equal along
the filter.
-/
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/CountableSeparatingOn.lean | 235 | 241 | theorem of_eventually_mem_of_forall_separating_mem_iff (p : Set β → Prop) {s : Set β}
[h' : HasCountableSeparatingOn β p s] (hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ s) (hg : ∀ᶠ x in l, g x ∈ s)
(h : ∀ U : Set β, p U → ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ∈ U ↔ g x ∈ U) : f =ᶠ[l] g := by | rcases h'.1 with ⟨S, hSc, hSp, hS⟩
have H : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∀ s ∈ S, f x ∈ s ↔ g x ∈ s :=
(eventually_countable_ball hSc).2 fun s hs ↦ (h _ (hSp _ hs))
filter_upwards [H, hf, hg] with x hx hxf hxg using hS _ hxf _ hxg hx |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Indicator
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.BigOperators
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineSubspace.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Finsupp.LinearCombination
import Mathlib.Tactic.FinCases
/-!
# Affine combinations of points
This file defines affine combinations of points.
## Main definitions
* `weightedVSubOfPoint` is a general weighted combination of
subtractions with an explicit base point, yielding a vector.
* `weightedVSub` uses an arbitrary choice of base point and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 0, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
* `affineCombination` adds the weighted combination to the arbitrary
base point, yielding a point rather than a vector, and is intended
to be used when the sum of weights is 1, in which case the result is
independent of the choice of base point.
These definitions are for sums over a `Finset`; versions for a
`Fintype` may be obtained using `Finset.univ`, while versions for a
`Finsupp` may be obtained using `Finsupp.support`.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affine_space
-/
noncomputable section
open Affine
namespace Finset
theorem univ_fin2 : (univ : Finset (Fin 2)) = {0, 1} := by
ext x
fin_cases x <;> simp
variable {k : Type*} {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [Ring k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [S : AffineSpace V P]
variable {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι)
variable {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a base point from the
given points, as a linear map on the weights. The main cases of
interest are where the sum of the weights is 0, in which case the sum
is independent of the choice of base point, and where the sum of the
weights is 1, in which case the sum added to the base point is
independent of the choice of base point. -/
def weightedVSubOfPoint (p : ι → P) (b : P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
∑ i ∈ s, (LinearMap.proj i : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] k).smulRight (p i -ᵥ b)
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ b) := by
simp [weightedVSubOfPoint, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- The value of `weightedVSubOfPoint`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun _ => p) b w = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p -ᵥ b) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_smul]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd (s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (v +ᵥ p) b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (-v +ᵥ b) w := by
simp [vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, add_comm]
lemma weightedVSubOfPoint_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
(s : Finset ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → V) (b : V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint (a • p) b w = a • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (a⁻¹ • b) w := by
simp [smul_sum, smul_sub, smul_comm a (w _)]
/-- `weightedVSubOfPoint` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) (b : P) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w₂ := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
refine sum_congr rfl fun i hi => ?_
rw [hw i hi, hp i hi]
/-- Given a family of points, if we use a member of the family as a base point, the
`weightedVSubOfPoint` does not depend on the value of the weights at this point. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_weights_eq (p : ι → P) (j : ι) (w₁ w₂ : ι → k)
(hw : ∀ i, i ≠ j → w₁ i = w₂ i) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p j) w₂ := by
simp only [Finset.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
congr
ext i
rcases eq_or_ne i j with h | h
· simp [h]
· simp [hw i h]
/-- The weighted sum is independent of the base point when the sum of
the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w := by
apply eq_of_sub_eq_zero
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, zero_smul]
/-- The weighted sum, added to the base point, is independent of the
base point when the sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1)
(b₁ b₂ : P) : s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₁ w +ᵥ b₁ = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b₂ w +ᵥ b₂ := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, vsub_vadd_eq_vsub_sub, ← add_sub_assoc, add_comm, add_sub_assoc, ←
sum_sub_distrib]
conv_lhs =>
congr
· skip
· congr
· skip
· ext
rw [← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_left]
rw [← sum_smul, h, one_smul, vsub_add_vsub_cancel, vsub_self]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by removing the base point, if
present, from the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_erase [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(s.erase i).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_erase
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by adding the base point, whether
or not present, to the set of points. -/
@[simp (high)]
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_insert [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (i : ι) :
(insert i s).weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (p i) w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
apply sum_insert_zero
rw [vsub_self, smul_zero]
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Eq.symm <|
sum_indicator_subset_of_eq_zero w (fun i wi => wi • (p i -ᵥ b : V)) h fun i => zero_smul k _
/-- A weighted sum, over the image of an embedding, equals a weighted
sum with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint (p ∘ e) b (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
exact Finset.sum_map _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two
`weightedVSubOfPoint` expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) (b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_sub_distrib, ← smul_sub, vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₁ b w - (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₂ -ᵥ b) := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant,
expressed as a subtraction involving a `weightedVSubOfPoint` expression. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_sub_weightedVSubOfPoint (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ b : P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = (∑ i ∈ s, w i) • (p₁ -ᵥ b) - s.weightedVSubOfPoint p₂ b w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w + s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) (b : P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSubOfPoint p b w - s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (-w) =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [map_neg, sub_neg_eq_add, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h]
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i => p i) b fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← sum_subtype_eq_sum_filter]
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, sum_filter_of_ne]
intro i hi hne
refine h i hi ?_
intro hw
simp [hw] at hne
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSubOfPoint` may be moved outside the
sum. -/
theorem weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (b : P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, smul_sum, Pi.smul_apply, smul_smul, smul_eq_mul]
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, as a linear map on the weights. This is
intended to be used when the sum of the weights is 0; that condition
is specified as a hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def weightedVSub (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ₗ[k] V :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty)
/-- Applying `weightedVSub` with given weights. This is for the case
where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example, when
that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case for
`weightedVSub` would involve selecting a preferred base point with
`weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero` and then
using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty) := by
simp [weightedVSub, LinearMap.sum_apply]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives the sum of the results of subtracting any
base point, when the sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (b : P) : s.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_eq_of_sum_eq_zero w p h _ _
/-- The value of `weightedVSub`, where the given points are equal and the sum of the weights
is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) :
s.weightedVSub (fun _ => p) w = 0 := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, zero_smul]
/-- The `weightedVSub` for an empty set is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_empty (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) : (∅ : Finset ι).weightedVSub p w = (0 : V) := by
simp [weightedVSub_apply]
lemma weightedVSub_vadd {s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → P) (v : V) :
s.weightedVSub (v +ᵥ p) w = s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
lemma weightedVSub_smul {G : Type*} [Group G] [DistribMulAction G V] [SMulCommClass G k V]
{s : Finset ι} {w : ι → k} (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) (p : ι → V) (a : G) :
s.weightedVSub (a • p) w = a • s.weightedVSub p w := by
rw [weightedVSub, weightedVSubOfPoint_smul,
weightedVSub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_of_sum_eq_zero _ _ _ h]
/-- `weightedVSub` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of points
that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.weightedVSub p₁ w₁ = s.weightedVSub p₂ w₂ :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp _
/-- The weighted sum is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem weightedVSub_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) :=
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h
/-- A weighted subtraction, over the image of an embedding, equals a
weighted subtraction with the same points and weights over the
original `Finset`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).weightedVSub p w = s₂.weightedVSub (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) :=
s₂.weightedVSubOfPoint_map _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `weightedVSub`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w - s.weightedVSub p₂ w :=
s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.weightedVSub p₁ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, sub_zero]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 0. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_neg_weightedVSub (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 0) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = -s.weightedVSub p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSub_sub, s.weightedVSub_apply_const _ _ h, zero_sub]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w + s₂.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of such sums over two subsets. -/
theorem weightedVSub_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) : (s \ s₂).weightedVSub p w - s₂.weightedVSub p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_sdiff_sub h _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).weightedVSub (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices in `s`
not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem weightedVSub_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop} [DecidablePred pred]
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) : {x ∈ s | pred x}.weightedVSub p w = s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h
/-- A constant multiplier of the weights in `weightedVSub_of` may be moved outside the sum. -/
theorem weightedVSub_const_smul (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (c : k) :
s.weightedVSub p (c • w) = c • s.weightedVSub p w :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_const_smul _ _ _ _
instance : AffineSpace (ι → k) (ι → k) := Pi.instAddTorsor
variable (k)
/-- A weighted sum of the results of subtracting a default base point
from the given points, added to that base point, as an affine map on
the weights. This is intended to be used when the sum of the weights
is 1, in which case it is an affine combination (barycenter) of the
points with the given weights; that condition is specified as a
hypothesis on those lemmas that require it. -/
def affineCombination (p : ι → P) : (ι → k) →ᵃ[k] P where
toFun w := s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty
linear := s.weightedVSub p
map_vadd' w₁ w₂ := by simp_rw [vadd_vadd, weightedVSub, vadd_eq_add, LinearMap.map_add]
/-- The linear map corresponding to `affineCombination` is
`weightedVSub`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_linear (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p).linear = s.weightedVSub p :=
rfl
variable {k}
/-- Applying `affineCombination` with given weights. This is for the
case where a result involving a default base point is OK (for example,
when that base point will cancel out later); a more typical use case
for `affineCombination` would involve selecting a preferred base
point with
`affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one` and
then using `weightedVSubOfPoint_apply`. -/
theorem affineCombination_apply (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s.affineCombination k p) w =
s.weightedVSubOfPoint p (Classical.choice S.nonempty) w +ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty :=
rfl
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points are equal. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_apply_const (w : ι → k) (p : P) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) :
s.affineCombination k (fun _ => p) w = p := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_apply_const, h, one_smul, vsub_vadd]
/-- `affineCombination` gives equal results for two families of weights and two families of
points that are equal on `s`. -/
theorem affineCombination_congr {w₁ w₂ : ι → k} (hw : ∀ i ∈ s, w₁ i = w₂ i) {p₁ p₂ : ι → P}
(hp : ∀ i ∈ s, p₁ i = p₂ i) : s.affineCombination k p₁ w₁ = s.affineCombination k p₂ w₂ := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, s.weightedVSubOfPoint_congr hw hp]
/-- `affineCombination` gives the sum with any base point, when the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (b : P) :
s.affineCombination k p w = s.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w +ᵥ b :=
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w p h _ _
/-- Adding a `weightedVSub` to an `affineCombination`. -/
theorem weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.weightedVSub p w₁ +ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.affineCombination k p (w₁ + w₂) := by
rw [← vadd_eq_add, AffineMap.map_vadd, affineCombination_linear]
/-- Subtracting two `affineCombination`s. -/
theorem affineCombination_vsub (w₁ w₂ : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
s.affineCombination k p w₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p w₂ = s.weightedVSub p (w₁ - w₂) := by
rw [← AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, affineCombination_linear, vsub_eq_sub]
theorem attach_affineCombination_of_injective [DecidableEq P] (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) (f : s → P)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
s.attach.affineCombination k f (w ∘ f) = (image f univ).affineCombination k id w := by
simp only [affineCombination, weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, id, vadd_right_cancel_iff,
Function.comp_apply, AffineMap.coe_mk]
let g₁ : s → V := fun i => w (f i) • (f i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
let g₂ : P → V := fun i => w i • (i -ᵥ Classical.choice S.nonempty)
change univ.sum g₁ = (image f univ).sum g₂
have hgf : g₁ = g₂ ∘ f := by
ext
simp [g₁, g₂]
rw [hgf, sum_image]
· simp only [g₁, g₂,Function.comp_apply]
· exact fun _ _ _ _ hxy => hf hxy
theorem attach_affineCombination_coe (s : Finset P) (w : P → k) :
s.attach.affineCombination k ((↑) : s → P) (w ∘ (↑)) = s.affineCombination k id w := by
classical rw [attach_affineCombination_of_injective s w ((↑) : s → P) Subtype.coe_injective,
univ_eq_attach, attach_image_val]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, a `weightedVSub` is just a linear
combination. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_eq_linear_combination {ι} (s : Finset ι) {w : ι → k} {p : ι → V}
(hw : s.sum w = 0) : s.weightedVSub p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.weightedVSub_apply, vsub_eq_sub, smul_sub, ← Finset.sum_smul, hw]
/-- Viewing a module as an affine space modelled on itself, affine combinations are just linear
combinations. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_eq_linear_combination (s : Finset ι) (p : ι → V) (w : ι → k)
(hw : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : s.affineCombination k p w = ∑ i ∈ s, w i • p i := by
simp [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw 0]
/-- An `affineCombination` equals a point if that point is in the set
and has weight 1 and the other points in the set have weight 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {i : ι} (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = 1) (hw0 : ∀ i2 ∈ s, i2 ≠ i → w i2 = 0) : s.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
have h1 : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1 := hwi ▸ sum_eq_single i hw0 fun h => False.elim (h his)
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h1 (p i),
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
convert zero_vadd V (p i)
refine sum_eq_zero ?_
intro i2 hi2
by_cases h : i2 = i
· simp [h]
· simp [hw0 i2 hi2 h]
/-- An affine combination is unaffected by changing the weights to the
corresponding indicator function and adding points to the set. -/
theorem affineCombination_indicator_subset (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {s₁ s₂ : Finset ι}
(h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k p (Set.indicator (↑s₁) w) := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
weightedVSubOfPoint_indicator_subset _ _ _ h]
/-- An affine combination, over the image of an embedding, equals an
affine combination with the same points and weights over the original
`Finset`. -/
theorem affineCombination_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).affineCombination k p w = s₂.affineCombination k (p ∘ e) (w ∘ e) := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_map]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, expressed as a subtraction of two `affineCombination`
expressions. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ p₂ : ι → P) :
(∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂ i)) =
s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.sum_smul_vsub_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_sub _ _ _ _
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the right is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_vsub_const_eq_affineCombination_vsub (w : ι → k) (p₁ : ι → P) (p₂ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ i -ᵥ p₂)) = s.affineCombination k p₁ w -ᵥ p₂ := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum of pairwise subtractions, where the point on the left is constant and the
sum of the weights is 1. -/
theorem sum_smul_const_vsub_eq_vsub_affineCombination (w : ι → k) (p₂ : ι → P) (p₁ : P)
(h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) : (∑ i ∈ s, w i • (p₁ -ᵥ p₂ i)) = p₁ -ᵥ s.affineCombination k p₂ w := by
rw [sum_smul_vsub_eq_affineCombination_vsub, affineCombination_apply_const _ _ _ h]
/-- A weighted sum may be split into a subtraction of affine combinations over two subsets. -/
theorem affineCombination_sdiff_sub [DecidableEq ι] {s₂ : Finset ι} (h : s₂ ⊆ s) (w : ι → k)
(p : ι → P) :
(s \ s₂).affineCombination k p w -ᵥ s₂.affineCombination k p (-w) = s.weightedVSub p w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right]
exact s.weightedVSub_sdiff_sub h _ _
/-- If a weighted sum is zero and one of the weights is `-1`, the corresponding point is
the affine combination of the other points with the given weights. -/
theorem affineCombination_eq_of_weightedVSub_eq_zero_of_eq_neg_one {w : ι → k} {p : ι → P}
(hw : s.weightedVSub p w = (0 : V)) {i : ι} [DecidablePred (· ≠ i)] (his : i ∈ s)
(hwi : w i = -1) : {x ∈ s | x ≠ i}.affineCombination k p w = p i := by
classical
rw [← @vsub_eq_zero_iff_eq V, ← hw,
← s.affineCombination_sdiff_sub (singleton_subset_iff.2 his), sdiff_singleton_eq_erase,
← filter_ne']
congr
refine (affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ _ (mem_singleton_self _) ?_ ?_).symm
· simp [hwi]
· simp
/-- An affine combination over `s.subtype pred` equals one over `{x ∈ s | pred x}`. -/
theorem affineCombination_subtype_eq_filter (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) (pred : ι → Prop)
[DecidablePred pred] :
((s.subtype pred).affineCombination k (fun i => p i) fun i => w i) =
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply, weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype_eq_filter]
/-- An affine combination over `{x ∈ s | pred x}` equals one over `s` if all the weights at indices
in `s` not satisfying `pred` are zero. -/
theorem affineCombination_filter_of_ne (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P) {pred : ι → Prop}
[DecidablePred pred] (h : ∀ i ∈ s, w i ≠ 0 → pred i) :
{x ∈ s | pred x}.affineCombination k p w = s.affineCombination k p w := by
rw [affineCombination_apply, affineCombination_apply,
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_filter_of_ne _ _ _ h]
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with a given sum of weights if and only if it can be expressed as
`weightedVSubOfPoint` with that sum of weights for the
corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype {v : V} {x : k} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} {b : P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint p b w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = x ∧
v = fs.weightedVSubOfPoint (fun i : s => p i) b w := by
classical
simp_rw [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨fs, hfs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
exact ⟨fs.subtype s, fun i => w i, sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs, (sum_subtype_of_mem _ hfs).symm⟩
· rintro ⟨fs, w, rfl, rfl⟩
refine
⟨fs.map (Function.Embedding.subtype _), map_subtype_subset _, fun i =>
if h : i ∈ s then w ⟨i, h⟩ else 0, ?_, ?_⟩ <;>
simp
variable (k)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A vector can be expressed as `weightedVSub` using
a `Finset` lying within that subset and with sum of weights 0 if and
only if it can be expressed as `weightedVSub` with sum of weights 0
for the corresponding indexed family whose index type is the subtype
corresponding to that subset. -/
theorem eq_weightedVSub_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSub_subtype {v : V} {s : Set ι} {p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 0 ∧
v = fs.weightedVSub (fun i : s => p i) w :=
eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable (V)
/-- Suppose an indexed family of points is given, along with a subset
of the index type. A point can be expressed as an
`affineCombination` using a `Finset` lying within that subset and
with sum of weights 1 if and only if it can be expressed an
`affineCombination` with sum of weights 1 for the corresponding
indexed family whose index type is the subtype corresponding to that
subset. -/
theorem eq_affineCombination_subset_iff_eq_affineCombination_subtype {p0 : P} {s : Set ι}
{p : ι → P} :
(∃ fs : Finset ι, ↑fs ⊆ s ∧ ∃ w : ι → k, ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k p w) ↔
∃ (fs : Finset s) (w : s → k), ∑ i ∈ fs, w i = 1 ∧
p0 = fs.affineCombination k (fun i : s => p i) w := by
simp_rw [affineCombination_apply, eq_vadd_iff_vsub_eq]
exact eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subset_iff_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_subtype
variable {k V}
/-- Affine maps commute with affine combinations. -/
theorem map_affineCombination {V₂ P₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup V₂] [Module k V₂] [AffineSpace V₂ P₂]
(p : ι → P) (w : ι → k) (hw : s.sum w = 1) (f : P →ᵃ[k] P₂) :
f (s.affineCombination k p w) = s.affineCombination k (f ∘ p) w := by
have b := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V P).nonempty
have b₂ := Classical.choice (inferInstance : AffineSpace V₂ P₂).nonempty
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p hw b,
s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw b₂, ←
s.weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_eq_of_sum_eq_one w (f ∘ p) hw (f b) b₂]
simp only [weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, RingHom.id_apply, AffineMap.map_vadd,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, AffineMap.linearMap_vsub, map_sum, Function.comp_apply]
/-- The value of `affineCombination`, where the given points take only two values. -/
lemma affineCombination_apply_eq_lineMap_sum [DecidableEq ι] (w : ι → k) (p : ι → P)
(p₁ p₂ : P) (s' : Finset ι) (h : ∑ i ∈ s, w i = 1) (hp₂ : ∀ i ∈ s ∩ s', p i = p₂)
(hp₁ : ∀ i ∈ s \ s', p i = p₁) :
s.affineCombination k p w = AffineMap.lineMap p₁ p₂ (∑ i ∈ s ∩ s', w i) := by
rw [s.affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one w p h p₁,
weightedVSubOfPoint_apply, ← s.sum_inter_add_sum_diff s', AffineMap.lineMap_apply,
vadd_right_cancel_iff, sum_smul]
convert add_zero _ with i hi
· convert Finset.sum_const_zero with i hi
simp [hp₁ i hi]
· exact (hp₂ i hi).symm
variable (k)
/-- Weights for expressing a single point as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) : ι → k :=
Pi.single i 1
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i i = 1 := Pi.single_eq_same _ _
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : j ≠ i) :
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 0 := Pi.single_eq_of_ne h _
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i : ι} (h : i ∈ s) :
∑ j ∈ s, affineCombinationSingleWeights k i j = 1 := by
rw [← affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_self k i]
exact sum_eq_single_of_mem i h fun j _ hj => affineCombinationSingleWeights_apply_of_ne k hj
/-- Weights for expressing the subtraction of two points as a `weightedVSub`. -/
def weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) : ι → k :=
affineCombinationSingleWeights k i - affineCombinationSingleWeights k j
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i i = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j i = 1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j j = -1 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSubVSubWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i) (hj : t ≠ j) :
weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by simp [weightedVSubVSubWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) :
∑ t ∈ s, weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j t = 0 := by
simp_rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, Pi.sub_apply, sum_sub_distrib]
simp [hi, hj]
variable {k}
/-- Weights for expressing `lineMap` as an affine combination. -/
def affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (i j : ι) (c : k) : ι → k :=
c • weightedVSubVSubWeights k j i + affineCombinationSingleWeights k i
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_self [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i i c = affineCombinationSingleWeights k i := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_left [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c i = 1 - c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm, sub_eq_neg_add]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_right [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (h : i ≠ j) (c : k) :
affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c j = c := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, h.symm]
@[simp]
theorem affineCombinationLineMapWeights_apply_of_ne [DecidableEq ι] {i j t : ι} (hi : t ≠ i)
(hj : t ≠ j) (c : k) : affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 0 := by
simp [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, hi, hj]
@[simp]
theorem sum_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s)
(c : k) : ∑ t ∈ s, affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c t = 1 := by
simp_rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, Pi.add_apply, sum_add_distrib]
simp [hi, hj, ← mul_sum]
variable (k)
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationSingleWeights` gives the specified point. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationSingleWeights k i) = p i := by
refine s.affineCombination_of_eq_one_of_eq_zero _ _ hi (by simp) ?_
rintro j - hj
simp [hj]
/-- A weighted subtraction with `weightedVSubVSubWeights` gives the result of subtracting the
specified points. -/
@[simp]
theorem weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι} (hi : i ∈ s)
(hj : j ∈ s) : s.weightedVSub p (weightedVSubVSubWeights k i j) = p i -ᵥ p j := by
rw [weightedVSubVSubWeights, ← affineCombination_vsub,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hj]
variable {k}
/-- An affine combination with `affineCombinationLineMapWeights` gives the result of
`line_map`. -/
@[simp]
theorem affineCombination_affineCombinationLineMapWeights [DecidableEq ι] (p : ι → P) {i j : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) (hj : j ∈ s) (c : k) :
s.affineCombination k p (affineCombinationLineMapWeights i j c) =
AffineMap.lineMap (p i) (p j) c := by
rw [affineCombinationLineMapWeights, ← weightedVSub_vadd_affineCombination,
weightedVSub_const_smul, s.affineCombination_affineCombinationSingleWeights k p hi,
s.weightedVSub_weightedVSubVSubWeights k p hj hi, AffineMap.lineMap_apply]
end Finset
namespace Finset
variable (k : Type*) {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [DivisionRing k] [AddCommGroup V] [Module k V]
variable [AffineSpace V P] {ι : Type*} (s : Finset ι) {ι₂ : Type*} (s₂ : Finset ι₂)
/-- The weights for the centroid of some points. -/
def centroidWeights : ι → k :=
Function.const ι (#s : k)⁻¹
/-- `centroidWeights` at any point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroidWeights_apply (i : ι) : s.centroidWeights k i = (#s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
/-- `centroidWeights` equals a constant function. -/
theorem centroidWeights_eq_const : s.centroidWeights k = Function.const ι (#s : k)⁻¹ :=
rfl
variable {k} in
/-- The weights in the centroid sum to 1, if the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero (h : (#s : k) ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by simp [h]
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is not zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] (h : #s ≠ 0) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 := by
simp_all
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (ne_of_gt (card_pos.2 h))
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid sum
to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] {n : ℕ} (h : #s = n + 1) :
∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i = 1 :=
s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k (h.symm ▸ Nat.succ_ne_zero n)
/-- The centroid of some points. Although defined for any `s`, this
is intended to be used in the case where the number of points,
converted to `k`, is not zero. -/
def centroid (p : ι → P) : P :=
s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k)
/-- The definition of the centroid. -/
theorem centroid_def (p : ι → P) : s.centroid k p = s.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
theorem centroid_univ (s : Finset P) : univ.centroid k ((↑) : s → P) = s.centroid k id := by
rw [centroid, centroid, ← s.attach_affineCombination_coe]
congr
ext
simp
/-- The centroid of a single point. -/
@[simp]
theorem centroid_singleton (p : ι → P) (i : ι) : ({i} : Finset ι).centroid k p = p i := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_apply]
/-- The centroid of two points, expressed directly as adding a vector
to a point. -/
theorem centroid_pair [DecidableEq ι] [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : ι → P) (i₁ i₂ : ι) :
({i₁, i₂} : Finset ι).centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p i₂ -ᵥ p i₁) +ᵥ p i₁ := by
by_cases h : i₁ = i₂
· simp [h]
· have hc : (#{i₁, i₂} : k) ≠ 0 := by
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem (not_mem_singleton.2 h), card_singleton]
norm_num
exact Invertible.ne_zero _
rw [centroid_def,
affineCombination_eq_weightedVSubOfPoint_vadd_of_sum_eq_one _ _ _
(sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_cast_card_ne_zero _ hc) (p i₁)]
simp [h, one_add_one_eq_two]
/-- The centroid of two points indexed by `Fin 2`, expressed directly
as adding a vector to the first point. -/
theorem centroid_pair_fin [Invertible (2 : k)] (p : Fin 2 → P) :
univ.centroid k p = (2⁻¹ : k) • (p 1 -ᵥ p 0) +ᵥ p 0 := by
rw [univ_fin2]
convert centroid_pair k p 0 1
/-- A centroid, over the image of an embedding, equals a centroid with
the same points and weights over the original `Finset`. -/
theorem centroid_map (e : ι₂ ↪ ι) (p : ι → P) :
(s₂.map e).centroid k p = s₂.centroid k (p ∘ e) := by
simp [centroid_def, affineCombination_map, centroidWeights]
/-- `centroidWeights` gives the weights for the centroid as a
constant function, which is suitable when summing over the points
whose centroid is being taken. This function gives the weights in a
form suitable for summing over a larger set of points, as an indicator
function that is zero outside the set whose centroid is being taken.
In the case of a `Fintype`, the sum may be over `univ`. -/
def centroidWeightsIndicator : ι → k :=
Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k)
/-- The definition of `centroidWeightsIndicator`. -/
theorem centroidWeightsIndicator_def :
s.centroidWeightsIndicator k = Set.indicator (↑s) (s.centroidWeights k) :=
rfl
/-- The sum of the weights for the centroid indexed by a `Fintype`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator [Fintype ι] :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = ∑ i ∈ s, s.centroidWeights k i :=
sum_indicator_subset _ (subset_univ _)
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is not
zero. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero [CharZero k] [Fintype ι]
(h : #s ≠ 0) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_ne_zero k h
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the set is nonempty. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_nonempty [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] (h : s.Nonempty) :
∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_nonempty k h
/-- In the characteristic zero case, the weights in the centroid
indexed by a `Fintype` sum to 1 if the number of points is `n + 1`. -/
theorem sum_centroidWeightsIndicator_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one [CharZero k] [Fintype ι] {n : ℕ}
(h : #s = n + 1) : ∑ i, s.centroidWeightsIndicator k i = 1 := by
rw [sum_centroidWeightsIndicator]
exact s.sum_centroidWeights_eq_one_of_card_eq_add_one k h
/-- The centroid as an affine combination over a `Fintype`. -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Combination.lean | 853 | 864 | theorem centroid_eq_affineCombination_fintype [Fintype ι] (p : ι → P) :
s.centroid k p = univ.affineCombination k p (s.centroidWeightsIndicator k) :=
affineCombination_indicator_subset _ _ (subset_univ _)
/-- An indexed family of points that is injective on the given
`Finset` has the same centroid as the image of that `Finset`. This is
stated in terms of a set equal to the image to provide control of
definitional equality for the index type used for the centroid of the
image. -/
theorem centroid_eq_centroid_image_of_inj_on {p : ι → P}
(hi : ∀ i ∈ s, ∀ j ∈ s, p i = p j → i = j) {ps : Set P} [Fintype ps]
(hps : ps = p '' ↑s) : s.centroid k p = (univ : Finset ps).centroid k fun x => (x : P) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Defs
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported dependent functions
Let `N : α → Type*` be a type family, assume that `N a` has a `0` for all `a : α` and let
`f g : Π₀ a, N a` be finitely supported dependent functions.
## Main definition
* `DFinsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N a` is an additive group for all `a`, `DFinsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`DFinsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {N : α → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, Zero (N a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : Π₀ a, N a) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x ↦ f x ≠ g x
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } :=
Set.ext fun _x ↦ mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h ↦
ext fun a ↦ not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h ↦ h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : Π₀ a, N a).neLocus f = f.support :=
(neLocus_comm _ _).trans (neLocus_zero_right _)
end NHasZero
section NeLocusAndMaps
variable {M P : α → Type*} [∀ a, Zero (N a)] [∀ a, Zero (M a)] [∀ a, Zero (P a)]
theorem subset_mapRange_neLocus [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
{F : ∀ a, N a → M a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 = 0) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) ⊆ f.neLocus g := fun a ↦ by
simpa only [mem_neLocus, mapRange_apply, not_imp_not] using congr_arg (F a)
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_left [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (P a)]
{F : ∀ a, M a → N a → P a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 0 = 0) (f : Π₀ a, M a) (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ a, N a)
(hF : ∀ a f, Function.Injective fun g ↦ F a f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f g₁).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f g₂) = g₁.neLocus g₂ := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a _).ne_iff
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_right [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (P a)]
{F : ∀ a, M a → N a → P a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 0 = 0) (f₁ f₂ : Π₀ a, M a) (g : Π₀ a, N a)
(hF : ∀ a g, Function.Injective fun f ↦ F a f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f₁ g).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f₂ g) = f₁.neLocus f₂ := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a _).ne_iff
theorem mapRange_neLocus_eq [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
{F : ∀ a, N a → M a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 = 0) (hF : ∀ a, Function.Injective (F a)) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) = f.neLocus g := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a).ne_iff
end NeLocusAndMaps
variable [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_left [∀ a, AddLeftCancelMonoid (N a)] (f g h : Π₀ a, N a) :
(f + g).neLocus (f + h) = g.neLocus h :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_left _ _ _ _ fun _a ↦ add_right_injective
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_right [∀ a, AddRightCancelMonoid (N a)] (f g h : Π₀ a, N a) :
(f + h).neLocus (g + h) = f.neLocus g :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_right _ _ _ _ fun _a ↦ add_left_injective
section AddGroup
variable [∀ a, AddGroup (N a)] (f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : Π₀ a, N a)
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_neg_neg : neLocus (-f) (-g) = f.neLocus g :=
mapRange_neLocus_eq _ _ (fun _a ↦ neg_zero) fun _a ↦ neg_injective
theorem neLocus_neg : neLocus (-f) g = f.neLocus (-g) := by rw [← neLocus_neg_neg, neg_neg]
theorem neLocus_eq_support_sub : f.neLocus g = (f - g).support := by
rw [← @neLocus_add_right α N _ _ _ _ _ (-g), add_neg_cancel, neLocus_zero_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_left : neLocus (f - g₁) (f - g₂) = neLocus g₁ g₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, @neLocus_add_left α N _ _ _, neLocus_neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_right : neLocus (f₁ - g) (f₂ - g) = neLocus f₁ f₂ := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using @neLocus_add_right α N _ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_self_add_right : neLocus f (f + g) = g.support := by
rw [← neLocus_zero_left, ← @neLocus_add_left α N _ _ _ f 0 g, add_zero]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/NeLocus.lean | 142 | 142 | theorem neLocus_self_add_left : neLocus (f + g) f = g.support := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll, Anatole Dedecker
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Equicontinuity
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.FilterBasis
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LocallyConvex
/-!
# Topology induced by a family of seminorms
## Main definitions
* `SeminormFamily.basisSets`: The set of open seminorm balls for a family of seminorms.
* `SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis`: A module filter basis formed by the open balls.
* `Seminorm.IsBounded`: A linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is bounded iff every seminorm in `F` can be
bounded by a finite number of seminorms in `E`.
## Main statements
* `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace`: A space equipped with a family of seminorms is locally
convex.
* `WithSeminorms.firstCountable`: A space is first countable if it's topology is induced by a
countable family of seminorms.
## Continuity of semilinear maps
If `E` and `F` are topological vector space with the topology induced by a family of seminorms, then
we have a direct method to prove that a linear map is continuous:
* `Seminorm.continuous_from_bounded`: A bounded linear map `f : E →ₗ[𝕜] F` is continuous.
If the topology of a space `E` is induced by a family of seminorms, then we can characterize von
Neumann boundedness in terms of that seminorm family. Together with
`LinearMap.continuous_of_locally_bounded` this gives general criterion for continuity.
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_finset_seminorm_bounded`
* `WithSeminorms.image_isVonNBounded_iff_seminorm_bounded`
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex
-/
open NormedField Set Seminorm TopologicalSpace Filter List
open NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕝 𝕝₂ E F G ι ι' : Type*}
section FilterBasis
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable (𝕜 E ι)
/-- An abbreviation for indexed families of seminorms. This is mainly to allow for dot-notation. -/
abbrev SeminormFamily :=
ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E
variable {𝕜 E ι}
namespace SeminormFamily
/-- The sets of a filter basis for the neighborhood filter of 0. -/
def basisSets (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : Set (Set E) :=
⋃ (s : Finset ι) (r) (_ : 0 < r), singleton (ball (s.sup p) (0 : E) r)
variable (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
theorem basisSets_iff {U : Set E} :
U ∈ p.basisSets ↔ ∃ (i : Finset ι) (r : ℝ), 0 < r ∧ U = ball (i.sup p) 0 r := by
simp only [basisSets, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_singleton_iff]
theorem basisSets_mem (i : Finset ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (i.sup p).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨i, _, hr, rfl⟩
theorem basisSets_singleton_mem (i : ι) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) : (p i).ball 0 r ∈ p.basisSets :=
(basisSets_iff _).mpr ⟨{i}, _, hr, by rw [Finset.sup_singleton]⟩
theorem basisSets_nonempty [Nonempty ι] : p.basisSets.Nonempty := by
let i := Classical.arbitrary ι
refine nonempty_def.mpr ⟨(p i).ball 0 1, ?_⟩
exact p.basisSets_singleton_mem i zero_lt_one
theorem basisSets_intersect (U V : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) (hV : V ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ z ∈ p.basisSets, z ⊆ U ∩ V := by
classical
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r₁, hr₁, hU⟩
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hV with ⟨t, r₂, hr₂, hV⟩
use ((s ∪ t).sup p).ball 0 (min r₁ r₂)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem (s ∪ t) (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩), ?_⟩
rw [hU, hV, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ (lt_min_iff.mpr ⟨hr₁, hr₂⟩),
ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₁, ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr₂]
exact
Set.subset_inter
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_left hi, ball_mono <| min_le_left _ _⟩)
(Set.iInter₂_mono' fun i hi =>
⟨i, Finset.subset_union_right hi, ball_mono <| min_le_right _ _⟩)
theorem basisSets_zero (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : (0 : E) ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨ι', r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, mem_ball_zero, map_zero]
exact hr
theorem basisSets_add (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V + V ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / 2)
refine ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr zero_lt_two), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_add_ball_subset (s.sup p) (r / 2) (r / 2) 0 0) ?_
rw [hU, add_zero, add_halves]
theorem basisSets_neg (U) (hU' : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.basisSets, V ⊆ (fun x : E => -x) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU' with ⟨s, r, _, hU⟩
rw [hU, neg_preimage, neg_ball (s.sup p), neg_zero]
exact ⟨U, hU', Eq.subset hU⟩
/-- The `addGroupFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def addGroupFilterBasis [Nonempty ι] : AddGroupFilterBasis E :=
addGroupFilterBasisOfComm p.basisSets p.basisSets_nonempty p.basisSets_intersect p.basisSets_zero
p.basisSets_add p.basisSets_neg
theorem basisSets_smul_right (v : E) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∀ᶠ x : 𝕜 in 𝓝 0, x • v ∈ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU, Filter.eventually_iff]
simp_rw [(s.sup p).mem_ball_zero, map_smul_eq_mul]
by_cases h : 0 < (s.sup p) v
· simp_rw [(lt_div_iff₀ h).symm]
rw [← _root_.ball_zero_eq]
exact Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (div_pos hr h)
simp_rw [le_antisymm (not_lt.mp h) (apply_nonneg _ v), mul_zero, hr]
exact IsOpen.mem_nhds isOpen_univ (mem_univ 0)
variable [Nonempty ι]
theorem basisSets_smul (U) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ 𝓝 (0 : 𝕜), ∃ W ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V • W ⊆ U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
refine ⟨Metric.ball 0 √r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 √r, p.basisSets_mem s (Real.sqrt_pos.mpr hr), ?_⟩
refine Set.Subset.trans (ball_smul_ball (s.sup p) √r √r) ?_
rw [hU, Real.mul_self_sqrt (le_of_lt hr)]
theorem basisSets_smul_left (x : 𝕜) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) :
∃ V ∈ p.addGroupFilterBasis.sets, V ⊆ (fun y : E => x • y) ⁻¹' U := by
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, hU⟩
rw [hU]
by_cases h : x ≠ 0
· rw [(s.sup p).smul_ball_preimage 0 r x h, smul_zero]
use (s.sup p).ball 0 (r / ‖x‖)
exact ⟨p.basisSets_mem s (div_pos hr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h)), Subset.rfl⟩
refine ⟨(s.sup p).ball 0 r, p.basisSets_mem s hr, ?_⟩
simp only [not_ne_iff.mp h, Set.subset_def, mem_ball_zero, hr, mem_univ, map_zero, imp_true_iff,
preimage_const_of_mem, zero_smul]
/-- The `moduleFilterBasis` induced by the filter basis `Seminorm.basisSets`. -/
protected def moduleFilterBasis : ModuleFilterBasis 𝕜 E where
toAddGroupFilterBasis := p.addGroupFilterBasis
smul' := p.basisSets_smul _
smul_left' := p.basisSets_smul_left
smul_right' := p.basisSets_smul_right
theorem filter_eq_iInf (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i => ?_) ?_
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.le_basis_iff
(Metric.nhds_basis_ball.comap _)]
intro ε hε
refine ⟨(p i).ball 0 ε, ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [← (Finset.sup_singleton : _ = p i)]
exact p.basisSets_mem {i} hε
· rw [id, (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball]
· rw [p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis.ge_iff]
rintro U (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets)
rcases p.basisSets_iff.mp hU with ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩
rw [id, Seminorm.ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, s.iInter_mem_sets]
exact fun i _ =>
Filter.mem_iInf_of_mem i
⟨Metric.ball 0 r, Metric.ball_mem_nhds 0 hr,
Eq.subset (p i).ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball.symm⟩
/-- If a family of seminorms is continuous, then their basis sets are neighborhoods of zero. -/
lemma basisSets_mem_nhds {𝕜 E ι : Type*} [NormedField 𝕜]
[AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [TopologicalSpace E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(hp : ∀ i, Continuous (p i)) (U : Set E) (hU : U ∈ p.basisSets) : U ∈ 𝓝 (0 : E) := by
obtain ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩ := p.basisSets_iff.mp hU
clear hU
refine Seminorm.ball_mem_nhds ?_ hr
classical
induction s using Finset.induction_on
case empty => simpa using continuous_zero
case insert a s _ hs =>
simp only [Finset.sup_insert, coe_sup]
exact Continuous.max (hp a) hs
end SeminormFamily
end FilterBasis
section Bounded
namespace Seminorm
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedField 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup F] [Module 𝕜₂ F]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
-- Todo: This should be phrased entirely in terms of the von Neumann bornology.
/-- The proposition that a linear map is bounded between spaces with families of seminorms. -/
def IsBounded (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : Prop :=
∀ i, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p
theorem isBounded_const (ι' : Type*) [Nonempty ι'] {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) :
IsBounded p (fun _ : ι' => q) f ↔ ∃ (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0), q.comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
simp only [IsBounded, forall_const]
theorem const_isBounded (ι : Type*) [Nonempty ι] {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F}
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F) : IsBounded (fun _ : ι => p) q f ↔ ∀ i, ∃ C : ℝ≥0, (q i).comp f ≤ C • p := by
constructor <;> intro h i
· rcases h i with ⟨s, C, h⟩
exact ⟨C, le_trans h (smul_le_smul (Finset.sup_le fun _ _ => le_rfl) le_rfl)⟩
use {Classical.arbitrary ι}
simp only [h, Finset.sup_singleton]
theorem isBounded_sup {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {q : ι' → Seminorm 𝕜₂ F} {f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] F}
(hf : IsBounded p q f) (s' : Finset ι') :
∃ (C : ℝ≥0) (s : Finset ι), (s'.sup q).comp f ≤ C • s.sup p := by
classical
obtain rfl | _ := s'.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· exact ⟨1, ∅, by simp [Seminorm.bot_eq_zero]⟩
choose fₛ fC hf using hf
use s'.card • s'.sup fC, Finset.biUnion s' fₛ
have hs : ∀ i : ι', i ∈ s' → (q i).comp f ≤ s'.sup fC • (Finset.biUnion s' fₛ).sup p := by
intro i hi
refine (hf i).trans (smul_le_smul ?_ (Finset.le_sup hi))
exact Finset.sup_mono (Finset.subset_biUnion_of_mem fₛ hi)
refine (comp_mono f (finset_sup_le_sum q s')).trans ?_
simp_rw [← pullback_apply, map_sum, pullback_apply]
refine (Finset.sum_le_sum hs).trans ?_
rw [Finset.sum_const, smul_assoc]
end Seminorm
end Bounded
section Topology
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι]
/-- The proposition that the topology of `E` is induced by a family of seminorms `p`. -/
structure WithSeminorms (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) [topology : TopologicalSpace E] : Prop where
topology_eq_withSeminorms : topology = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology
theorem WithSeminorms.withSeminorms_eq {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι} [t : TopologicalSpace E]
(hp : WithSeminorms p) : t = p.moduleFilterBasis.topology :=
hp.1
variable [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
theorem WithSeminorms.topologicalAddGroup (hp : WithSeminorms p) : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup _
theorem WithSeminorms.continuousSMul (hp : WithSeminorms p) : ContinuousSMul 𝕜 E := by
rw [hp.withSeminorms_eq]
exact ModuleFilterBasis.continuousSMul _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id := by
rw [congr_fun (congr_arg (@nhds E) hp.1) 0]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_hasBasis _
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_zero_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball 0 sr.2 := by
refine ⟨fun V => ?_⟩
simp only [hp.hasBasis.mem_iff, SeminormFamily.basisSets_iff, Prod.exists]
constructor
· rintro ⟨-, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
exact ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
· rintro ⟨s, r, hr, hV⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨s, r, hr, rfl⟩, hV⟩
theorem WithSeminorms.hasBasis_ball (hp : WithSeminorms p) {x : E} :
(𝓝 (x : E)).HasBasis
(fun sr : Finset ι × ℝ => 0 < sr.2) fun sr => (sr.1.sup p).ball x sr.2 := by
have : IsTopologicalAddGroup E := hp.topologicalAddGroup
rw [← map_add_left_nhds_zero]
convert hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.map (x + ·) using 1
ext sr : 1
-- Porting note: extra type ascriptions needed on `0`
have : (sr.fst.sup p).ball (x +ᵥ (0 : E)) sr.snd = x +ᵥ (sr.fst.sup p).ball 0 sr.snd :=
Eq.symm (Seminorm.vadd_ball (sr.fst.sup p))
rwa [vadd_eq_add, add_zero] at this
/-- The `x`-neighbourhoods of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around `x`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (U : Set E) :
U ∈ 𝓝 x ↔ ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
rw [hp.hasBasis_ball.mem_iff, Prod.exists]
/-- The open sets of a space whose topology is induced by a family of seminorms
are exactly the sets which contain seminorm balls around all of their points. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.isOpen_iff_mem_balls (hp : WithSeminorms p) (U : Set E) :
IsOpen U ↔ ∀ x ∈ U, ∃ s : Finset ι, ∃ r > 0, (s.sup p).ball x r ⊆ U := by
simp_rw [← WithSeminorms.mem_nhds_iff hp _ U, isOpen_iff_mem_nhds]
/- Note that through the following lemmas, one also immediately has that separating families
of seminorms induce T₂ and T₃ topologies by `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t2Space`
and `IsTopologicalAddGroup.t3Space` -/
/-- A separating family of seminorms induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating (hp : WithSeminorms p)
(h : ∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) : T1Space E := by
have := hp.topologicalAddGroup
refine IsTopologicalAddGroup.t1Space _ ?_
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, hp.isOpen_iff_mem_balls]
rintro x (hx : x ≠ 0)
obtain ⟨i, pi_nonzero⟩ := h x hx
refine ⟨{i}, p i x, by positivity, subset_compl_singleton_iff.mpr ?_⟩
rw [Finset.sup_singleton, mem_ball, zero_sub, map_neg_eq_map, not_lt]
/-- A family of seminorms inducing a T₁ topology is separating. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 [T1Space E] (hp : WithSeminorms p) (x : E) (hx : x ≠ 0) :
∃ i, p i x ≠ 0 := by
have := ((t1Space_TFAE E).out 0 9).mp (inferInstanceAs <| T1Space E)
by_contra! h
refine hx (this ?_)
rw [hp.hasBasis_zero_ball.specializes_iff]
rintro ⟨s, r⟩ (hr : 0 < r)
simp only [ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter _ _ _ hr, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball_zero, h, hr, forall_true_iff]
/-- A family of seminorms is separating iff it induces a T₁ topology. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.separating_iff_T1 (hp : WithSeminorms p) :
(∀ x, x ≠ 0 → ∃ i, p i x ≠ 0) ↔ T1Space E := by
refine ⟨WithSeminorms.T1_of_separating hp, ?_⟩
intro
exact WithSeminorms.separating_of_T1 hp
end Topology
section Tendsto
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] [Nonempty ι] [TopologicalSpace E]
variable {p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι}
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`.
Variant with `Finset.sup`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds' (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ (s : Finset ι) (ε), 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, s.sup p (u x - y₀) < ε := by
simp [hp.hasBasis_ball.tendsto_right_iff]
/-- Convergence along filters for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) {f : Filter F} (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u f (𝓝 y₀) ↔ ∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∀ᶠ x in f, p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds' u y₀]
exact
⟨fun h i => by simpa only [Finset.sup_singleton] using h {i}, fun h s ε hε =>
(s.eventually_all.2 fun i _ => h i ε hε).mono fun _ => finset_sup_apply_lt hε⟩
variable [SemilatticeSup F] [Nonempty F]
/-- Limit `→ ∞` for `WithSeminorms`. -/
theorem WithSeminorms.tendsto_nhds_atTop (hp : WithSeminorms p) (u : F → E) (y₀ : E) :
Filter.Tendsto u Filter.atTop (𝓝 y₀) ↔
∀ i ε, 0 < ε → ∃ x₀, ∀ x, x₀ ≤ x → p i (u x - y₀) < ε := by
rw [hp.tendsto_nhds u y₀]
exact forall₃_congr fun _ _ _ => Filter.eventually_atTop
end Tendsto
section IsTopologicalAddGroup
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [Nonempty ι]
section TopologicalSpace
variable [t : TopologicalSpace E]
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_nhds [IsTopologicalAddGroup E] (p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι)
(h : 𝓝 (0 : E) = p.moduleFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.filter) : WithSeminorms p := by
refine
⟨IsTopologicalAddGroup.ext inferInstance p.addGroupFilterBasis.isTopologicalAddGroup ?_⟩
rw [AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq]
exact h
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_of_hasBasis [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) (h : (𝓝 (0 : E)).HasBasis (fun s : Set E => s ∈ p.basisSets) id) :
WithSeminorms p :=
p.withSeminorms_of_nhds <|
Filter.HasBasis.eq_of_same_basis h p.addGroupFilterBasis.toFilterBasis.hasBasis
theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) : WithSeminorms p ↔ (𝓝 (0 : E)) = ⨅ i, (𝓝 0).comap (p i) := by
rw [← p.filter_eq_iInf]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, p.withSeminorms_of_nhds⟩
rw [h.topology_eq_withSeminorms]
exact AddGroupFilterBasis.nhds_zero_eq _
/-- The topology induced by a family of seminorms is exactly the infimum of the ones induced by
each seminorm individually. We express this as a characterization of `WithSeminorms p`. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/LocallyConvex/WithSeminorms.lean | 416 | 421 | theorem SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_topologicalSpace_eq_iInf [IsTopologicalAddGroup E]
(p : SeminormFamily 𝕜 E ι) :
WithSeminorms p ↔
t = ⨅ i, (p i).toSeminormedAddCommGroup.toUniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by | rw [p.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf,
IsTopologicalAddGroup.ext_iff inferInstance (topologicalAddGroup_iInf fun i => inferInstance), |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Pairwise
import Mathlib.Data.Set.BooleanAlgebra
/-!
# The set lattice
This file is a collection of results on the complete atomic boolean algebra structure of `Set α`.
Notation for the complete lattice operations can be found in `Mathlib.Order.SetNotation`.
## Main declarations
* `Set.sInter_eq_biInter`, `Set.sUnion_eq_biInter`: Shows that `⋂₀ s = ⋂ x ∈ s, x` and
`⋃₀ s = ⋃ x ∈ s, x`.
* `Set.completeAtomicBooleanAlgebra`: `Set α` is a `CompleteAtomicBooleanAlgebra` with `≤ = ⊆`,
`< = ⊂`, `⊓ = ∩`, `⊔ = ∪`, `⨅ = ⋂`, `⨆ = ⋃` and `\` as the set difference.
See `Set.instBooleanAlgebra`.
* `Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint`: Equivalence between `⋃ i, t i` and `Σ i, t i`, where `t` is an
indexed family of disjoint sets.
## Naming convention
In lemma names,
* `⋃ i, s i` is called `iUnion`
* `⋂ i, s i` is called `iInter`
* `⋃ i j, s i j` is called `iUnion₂`. This is an `iUnion` inside an `iUnion`.
* `⋂ i j, s i j` is called `iInter₂`. This is an `iInter` inside an `iInter`.
* `⋃ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biUnion` for "bounded `iUnion`". This is the special case of `iUnion₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
* `⋂ i ∈ s, t i` is called `biInter` for "bounded `iInter`". This is the special case of `iInter₂`
where `j : i ∈ s`.
## Notation
* `⋃`: `Set.iUnion`
* `⋂`: `Set.iInter`
* `⋃₀`: `Set.sUnion`
* `⋂₀`: `Set.sInter`
-/
open Function Set
universe u
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {ι ι' ι₂ : Sort*} {κ κ₁ κ₂ : ι → Sort*} {κ' : ι' → Sort*}
namespace Set
/-! ### Complete lattice and complete Boolean algebra instances -/
theorem mem_iUnion₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∃ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_iInter₂ {x : γ} {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set γ} : (x ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j) ↔ ∀ i j, x ∈ s i j := by
simp_rw [mem_iInter]
theorem mem_iUnion_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (i : ι) (ha : a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋃ i, s i :=
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, ha⟩
theorem mem_iUnion₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} {i : ι} (j : κ i) (ha : a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋃ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iUnion₂.2 ⟨i, j, ha⟩
theorem mem_iInter_of_mem {s : ι → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i, a ∈ s i) : a ∈ ⋂ i, s i :=
mem_iInter.2 h
theorem mem_iInter₂_of_mem {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {a : α} (h : ∀ i j, a ∈ s i j) :
a ∈ ⋂ (i) (j), s i j :=
mem_iInter₂.2 h
/-! ### Union and intersection over an indexed family of sets -/
@[congr]
theorem iUnion_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iUnion f₁ = iUnion f₂ :=
iSup_congr_Prop pq f
@[congr]
theorem iInter_congr_Prop {p q : Prop} {f₁ : p → Set α} {f₂ : q → Set α} (pq : p ↔ q)
(f : ∀ x, f₁ (pq.mpr x) = f₂ x) : iInter f₁ = iInter f₂ :=
iInf_congr_Prop pq f
theorem iUnion_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_up _
theorem iUnion_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋃ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋃ i, f i :=
iSup_plift_down _
theorem iInter_plift_up (f : PLift ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.up i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_up _
theorem iInter_plift_down (f : ι → Set α) : ⋂ i, f (PLift.down i) = ⋂ i, f i :=
iInf_plift_down _
theorem iUnion_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : p, s = if p then s else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_if _
theorem iUnion_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋃ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else ∅ :=
iSup_eq_dif _
theorem iInter_eq_if {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : Set α) : ⋂ _ : p, s = if p then s else univ :=
iInf_eq_if _
theorem iInf_eq_dif {p : Prop} [Decidable p] (s : p → Set α) :
⋂ h : p, s h = if h : p then s h else univ :=
_root_.iInf_eq_dif _
theorem exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set β)
(w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) (x : β) : ∃ i ∈ t, x ∈ s i := by
have p : x ∈ ⊤ := Set.mem_univ x
rw [← w, Set.mem_iUnion] at p
simpa using p
theorem nonempty_of_union_eq_top_of_nonempty {ι : Type*} (t : Set ι) (s : ι → Set α)
(H : Nonempty α) (w : ⋃ i ∈ t, s i = ⊤) : t.Nonempty := by
obtain ⟨x, m, -⟩ := exists_set_mem_of_union_eq_top t s w H.some
exact ⟨x, m⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion
{s : ι → Set α} (h_Union : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty) : Nonempty ι := by
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := h_Union
exact ⟨Classical.choose <| mem_iUnion.mp hx⟩
theorem nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion_eq_univ
{s : ι → Set α} [Nonempty α] (h_Union : ⋃ i, s i = univ) : Nonempty ι :=
nonempty_of_nonempty_iUnion (s := s) (by simpa only [h_Union] using univ_nonempty)
theorem setOf_exists (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∃ i, p i x } = ⋃ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iUnion.symm
theorem setOf_forall (p : ι → β → Prop) : { x | ∀ i, p i x } = ⋂ i, { x | p i x } :=
ext fun _ => mem_iInter.symm
theorem iUnion_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iSup_le h
theorem iUnion₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iUnion_subset fun x => iUnion_subset (h x)
theorem subset_iInter {t : Set β} {s : ι → Set β} (h : ∀ i, t ⊆ s i) : t ⊆ ⋂ i, s i :=
le_iInf h
theorem subset_iInter₂ {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j) :
s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
subset_iInter fun x => subset_iInter <| h x
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_subset_iff {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i, s i ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ => Subset.trans (le_iSup s _) h, iUnion_subset⟩
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iff {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t ↔ ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t := by simp_rw [iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem subset_iInter_iff {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} : (s ⊆ ⋂ i, t i) ↔ ∀ i, s ⊆ t i :=
le_iInf_iff
theorem subset_iInter₂_iff {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} :
(s ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j) ↔ ∀ i j, s ⊆ t i j := by simp_rw [subset_iInter_iff]
theorem subset_iUnion : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
le_iSup
theorem iInter_subset : ∀ (s : ι → Set β) (i : ι), ⋂ i, s i ⊆ s i :=
iInf_le
lemma iInter_subset_iUnion [Nonempty ι] {s : ι → Set α} : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := iInf_le_iSup
theorem subset_iUnion₂ {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), s i' j' :=
le_iSup₂ i j
theorem iInter₂_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ s i j :=
iInf₂_le i j
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ι → Set α} (i : ι) (h : s ⊆ t i) : s ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter_subset`is convenient with `apply`, and has `i`
explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter_subset_of_subset {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (h : s i ⊆ t) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ t :=
iInf_le_of_le i h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `subset_iUnion₂` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem subset_iUnion₂_of_subset {s : Set α} {t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s ⊆ t i j) : s ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
le_iSup₂_of_le i j h
/-- This rather trivial consequence of `iInter₂_subset` is convenient with `apply`, and has `i` and
`j` explicit for this purpose. -/
theorem iInter₂_subset_of_subset {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : Set α} (i : ι) (j : κ i)
(h : s i j ⊆ t) : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ t :=
iInf₂_le_of_le i j h
theorem iUnion_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iUnion_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iUnion s ⊆ iUnion t :=
iSup_mono h
theorem iUnion₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iSup₂_mono h
theorem iInter_mono {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : ⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_mono h
@[gcongr]
theorem iInter_mono'' {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) : iInter s ⊆ iInter t :=
iInf_mono h
theorem iInter₂_mono {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j ⊆ t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInf₂_mono h
theorem iUnion_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ∀ i, ∃ j, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋃ i, s i ⊆ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_mono' h
theorem iUnion₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i j, ∃ i' j', s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋃ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋃ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
iSup₂_mono' h
theorem iInter_mono' {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι' → Set α} (h : ∀ j, ∃ i, s i ⊆ t j) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ j, t j :=
Set.subset_iInter fun j =>
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := h j
iInter_subset_of_subset i hi
theorem iInter₂_mono' {s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} {t : ∀ i', κ' i' → Set α}
(h : ∀ i' j', ∃ i j, s i j ⊆ t i' j') : ⋂ (i) (j), s i j ⊆ ⋂ (i') (j'), t i' j' :=
subset_iInter₂_iff.2 fun i' j' =>
let ⟨_, _, hst⟩ := h i' j'
(iInter₂_subset _ _).trans hst
theorem iUnion₂_subset_iUnion (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋃ (i) (_ : κ i), s i ⊆ ⋃ i, s i :=
iUnion_mono fun _ => iUnion_subset fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iInter_subset_iInter₂ (κ : ι → Sort*) (s : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, s i ⊆ ⋂ (i) (_ : κ i), s i :=
iInter_mono fun _ => subset_iInter fun _ => Subset.rfl
theorem iUnion_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋃ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∃ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iUnion
theorem iInter_setOf (P : ι → α → Prop) : ⋂ i, { x : α | P i x } = { x : α | ∀ i, P i x } := by
ext
exact mem_iInter
theorem iUnion_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋃ x, f x = ⋃ y, g y :=
h1.iSup_congr h h2
theorem iInter_congr_of_surjective {f : ι → Set α} {g : ι₂ → Set α} (h : ι → ι₂) (h1 : Surjective h)
(h2 : ∀ x, g (h x) = f x) : ⋂ x, f x = ⋂ y, g y :=
h1.iInf_congr h h2
lemma iUnion_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋃ i, s i = ⋃ i, t i := iSup_congr h
lemma iInter_congr {s t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, s i = t i) : ⋂ i, s i = ⋂ i, t i := iInf_congr h
lemma iUnion₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋃ (i) (j), s i j = ⋃ (i) (j), t i j :=
iUnion_congr fun i => iUnion_congr <| h i
lemma iInter₂_congr {s t : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (h : ∀ i j, s i j = t i j) :
⋂ (i) (j), s i j = ⋂ (i) (j), t i j :=
iInter_congr fun i => iInter_congr <| h i
section Nonempty
variable [Nonempty ι] {f : ι → Set α} {s : Set α}
lemma iUnion_const (s : Set β) : ⋃ _ : ι, s = s := iSup_const
lemma iInter_const (s : Set β) : ⋂ _ : ι, s = s := iInf_const
lemma iUnion_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋃ i, f i = s :=
(iUnion_congr hf).trans <| iUnion_const _
lemma iInter_eq_const (hf : ∀ i, f i = s) : ⋂ i, f i = s :=
(iInter_congr hf).trans <| iInter_const _
end Nonempty
@[simp]
theorem compl_iUnion (s : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iSup
theorem compl_iUnion₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋃ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋂ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iUnion]
@[simp]
theorem compl_iInter (s : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, s i)ᶜ = ⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ :=
compl_iInf
theorem compl_iInter₂ (s : ∀ i, κ i → Set α) : (⋂ (i) (j), s i j)ᶜ = ⋃ (i) (j), (s i j)ᶜ := by
simp_rw [compl_iInter]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iUnion_eq_compl_iInter_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋃ i, s i = (⋂ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_compl]
-- classical -- complete_boolean_algebra
theorem iInter_eq_compl_iUnion_compl (s : ι → Set β) : ⋂ i, s i = (⋃ i, (s i)ᶜ)ᶜ := by
simp only [compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
theorem inter_iUnion (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iSup_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_inter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋃ i, t i ∩ s :=
iSup_inf_eq _ _
theorem iUnion_union_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋃ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∪ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_sup_eq
theorem iInter_inter_distrib (s : ι → Set β) (t : ι → Set β) :
⋂ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∩ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_inf_eq
theorem union_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iSup
theorem iUnion_union [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) ∪ s = ⋃ i, t i ∪ s :=
iSup_sup
theorem inter_iInter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∩ t i :=
inf_iInf
theorem iInter_inter [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋂ i, t i) ∩ s = ⋂ i, t i ∩ s :=
iInf_inf
theorem insert_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) :
insert x (⋃ i, t i) = ⋃ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iUnion_union]
-- classical
theorem union_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s ∪ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s ∪ t i :=
sup_iInf_eq _ _
theorem iInter_union (s : ι → Set β) (t : Set β) : (⋂ i, s i) ∪ t = ⋂ i, s i ∪ t :=
iInf_sup_eq _ _
theorem insert_iInter (x : β) (t : ι → Set β) : insert x (⋂ i, t i) = ⋂ i, insert x (t i) := by
simp_rw [← union_singleton, iInter_union]
theorem iUnion_diff (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (⋃ i, t i) \ s = ⋃ i, t i \ s :=
iUnion_inter _ _
theorem diff_iUnion [Nonempty ι] (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋃ i, t i) = ⋂ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iUnion, inter_iInter]; rfl
theorem diff_iInter (s : Set β) (t : ι → Set β) : (s \ ⋂ i, t i) = ⋃ i, s \ t i := by
rw [diff_eq, compl_iInter, inter_iUnion]; rfl
theorem iUnion_inter_subset {ι α} {s t : ι → Set α} : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i ⊆ (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
le_iSup_inf_iSup s t
theorem iUnion_inter_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iUnion_inter_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋃ i, s i ∩ t i = (⋃ i, s i) ∩ ⋃ i, t i :=
iSup_inf_of_antitone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_monotone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (swap (· ≤ ·))] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Monotone s) (ht : Monotone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_monotone hs ht
theorem iInter_union_of_antitone {ι α} [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)] {s t : ι → Set α}
(hs : Antitone s) (ht : Antitone t) : ⋂ i, s i ∪ t i = (⋂ i, s i) ∪ ⋂ i, t i :=
iInf_sup_of_antitone hs ht
/-- An equality version of this lemma is `iUnion_iInter_of_monotone` in `Data.Set.Finite`. -/
theorem iUnion_iInter_subset {s : ι → ι' → Set α} : (⋃ j, ⋂ i, s i j) ⊆ ⋂ i, ⋃ j, s i j :=
iSup_iInf_le_iInf_iSup (flip s)
theorem iUnion_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋃ o, s o = s none ∪ ⋃ i, s (some i) :=
iSup_option s
theorem iInter_option {ι} (s : Option ι → Set α) : ⋂ o, s o = s none ∩ ⋂ i, s (some i) :=
iInf_option s
section
variable (p : ι → Prop) [DecidablePred p]
theorem iUnion_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋃ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∪ ⋃ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iSup_dite _ _ _
theorem iUnion_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋃ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋃ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∪ ⋃ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iUnion_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_dite (f : ∀ i, p i → Set α) (g : ∀ i, ¬p i → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if h : p i then f i h else g i h) = (⋂ (i) (h : p i), f i h) ∩ ⋂ (i) (h : ¬p i), g i h :=
iInf_dite _ _ _
theorem iInter_ite (f g : ι → Set α) :
⋂ i, (if p i then f i else g i) = (⋂ (i) (_ : p i), f i) ∩ ⋂ (i) (_ : ¬p i), g i :=
iInter_dite _ _ _
end
/-! ### Unions and intersections indexed by `Prop` -/
theorem iInter_false {s : False → Set α} : iInter s = univ :=
iInf_false
theorem iUnion_false {s : False → Set α} : iUnion s = ∅ :=
iSup_false
@[simp]
theorem iInter_true {s : True → Set α} : iInter s = s trivial :=
iInf_true
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_true {s : True → Set α} : iUnion s = s trivial :=
iSup_true
@[simp]
theorem iInter_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋂ x, f x = ⋂ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iInf_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_exists {p : ι → Prop} {f : Exists p → Set α} :
⋃ x, f x = ⋃ (i) (h : p i), f ⟨i, h⟩ :=
iSup_exists
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_empty : (⋃ _ : ι, ∅ : Set α) = ∅ :=
iSup_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_univ : (⋂ _ : ι, univ : Set α) = univ :=
iInf_top
section
variable {s : ι → Set α}
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_eq_empty : ⋃ i, s i = ∅ ↔ ∀ i, s i = ∅ :=
iSup_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem iInter_eq_univ : ⋂ i, s i = univ ↔ ∀ i, s i = univ :=
iInf_eq_top
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_iUnion : (⋃ i, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i, (s i).Nonempty := by
simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem nonempty_biUnion {t : Set α} {s : α → Set β} :
(⋃ i ∈ t, s i).Nonempty ↔ ∃ i ∈ t, (s i).Nonempty := by simp
theorem iUnion_nonempty_index (s : Set α) (t : s.Nonempty → Set β) :
⋃ h, t h = ⋃ x ∈ s, t ⟨x, ‹_›⟩ :=
iSup_exists
end
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iInf_iInf_eq_right
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_left {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : x = b), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_left
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_right {b : β} {s : ∀ x : β, b = x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h : b = x), s x h = s b rfl :=
iSup_iSup_eq_right
theorem iInter_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋂ h, s h = (⋂ h : p, s (Or.inl h)) ∩ ⋂ h : q, s (Or.inr h) :=
iInf_or
theorem iUnion_or {p q : Prop} (s : p ∨ q → Set α) :
⋃ h, s h = (⋃ i, s (Or.inl i)) ∪ ⋃ j, s (Or.inr j) :=
iSup_or
theorem iUnion_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋃ h, s h = ⋃ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iSup_and
theorem iInter_and {p q : Prop} (s : p ∧ q → Set α) : ⋂ h, s h = ⋂ (hp) (hq), s ⟨hp, hq⟩ :=
iInf_and
theorem iUnion_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋃ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋃ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iSup_comm
theorem iInter_comm (s : ι → ι' → Set α) : ⋂ (i) (i'), s i i' = ⋂ (i') (i), s i i' :=
iInf_comm
theorem iUnion_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_sigma
theorem iUnion_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_sigma' _
theorem iInter_sigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : Sigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_sigma
theorem iInter_sigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : Sigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_sigma' _
theorem iUnion₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋃ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋃ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iSup₂_comm _
theorem iInter₂_comm (s : ∀ i₁, κ₁ i₁ → ∀ i₂, κ₂ i₂ → Set α) :
⋂ (i₁) (j₁) (i₂) (j₂), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ = ⋂ (i₂) (j₂) (i₁) (j₁), s i₁ j₁ i₂ j₂ :=
iInf₂_comm _
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋃ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋃ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iUnion_and, @iUnion_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and (p : ι → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p x ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p x ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (x : ι) (hx : p x) (y : ι') (hy : q x y), s x y ⟨hx, hy⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι']
@[simp]
theorem biInter_and' (p : ι' → Prop) (q : ι → ι' → Prop) (s : ∀ x y, p y ∧ q x y → Set α) :
⋂ (x : ι) (y : ι') (h : p y ∧ q x y), s x y h =
⋂ (y : ι') (hy : p y) (x : ι) (hx : q x y), s x y ⟨hy, hx⟩ := by
simp only [iInter_and, @iInter_comm _ ι]
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_iUnion_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋃ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∪ ⋃ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iUnion_or, iUnion_union_distrib, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
@[simp]
theorem iInter_iInter_eq_or_left {b : β} {p : β → Prop} {s : ∀ x : β, x = b ∨ p x → Set α} :
⋂ (x) (h), s x h = s b (Or.inl rfl) ∩ ⋂ (x) (h : p x), s x (Or.inr h) := by
simp only [iInter_or, iInter_inter_distrib, iInter_iInter_eq_left]
lemma iUnion_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋃ x, s x = (⋃ x, s (.inl x)) ∪ ⋃ x, s (.inr x) := iSup_sum
lemma iInter_sum {s : α ⊕ β → Set γ} : ⋂ x, s x = (⋂ x, s (.inl x)) ∩ ⋂ x, s (.inr x) := iInf_sum
theorem iUnion_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋃ ia, s ia = ⋃ i, ⋃ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iSup_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iUnion_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iUnion_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋃ i, ⋃ a, s i a = ⋃ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iSup_psigma' _
theorem iInter_psigma {γ : α → Type*} (s : PSigma γ → Set β) : ⋂ ia, s ia = ⋂ i, ⋂ a, s ⟨i, a⟩ :=
iInf_psigma _
/-- A reversed version of `iInter_psigma` with a curried map. -/
theorem iInter_psigma' {γ : α → Type*} (s : ∀ i, γ i → Set β) :
⋂ i, ⋂ a, s i a = ⋂ ia : PSigma γ, s ia.1 ia.2 :=
iInf_psigma' _
/-! ### Bounded unions and intersections -/
/-- A specialization of `mem_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem mem_biUnion {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} {y : β} (xs : x ∈ s) (ytx : y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iUnion₂_of_mem xs ytx
/-- A specialization of `mem_iInter₂`. -/
theorem mem_biInter {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {y : β} (h : ∀ x ∈ s, y ∈ t x) :
y ∈ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x :=
mem_iInter₂_of_mem h
/-- A specialization of `subset_iUnion₂`. -/
theorem subset_biUnion_of_mem {s : Set α} {u : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
u x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, u x :=
subset_iUnion₂ (s := fun i _ => u i) x xs
/-- A specialization of `iInter₂_subset`. -/
theorem biInter_subset_of_mem {s : Set α} {t : α → Set β} {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t x :=
iInter₂_subset x xs
lemma biInter_subset_biUnion {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {t : α → Set β} :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t x := biInf_le_biSup hs
theorem biUnion_subset_biUnion_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s ⊆ s') :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s', t x :=
iUnion₂_subset fun _ hx => subset_biUnion_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biInter_subset_biInter_left {s s' : Set α} {t : α → Set β} (h : s' ⊆ s) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s', t x :=
subset_iInter₂ fun _ hx => biInter_subset_of_mem <| h hx
theorem biUnion_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s' ⊆ s) (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋃ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biUnion_subset_biUnion_left hs).trans <| iUnion₂_mono h
theorem biInter_mono {s s' : Set α} {t t' : α → Set β} (hs : s ⊆ s') (h : ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ t' x) :
⋂ x ∈ s', t x ⊆ ⋂ x ∈ s, t' x :=
(biInter_subset_biInter_left hs).trans <| iInter₂_mono h
theorem biUnion_eq_iUnion (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋃ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋃ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iSup_subtype'
theorem biInter_eq_iInter (s : Set α) (t : ∀ x ∈ s, Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s, t x ‹_› = ⋂ x : s, t x x.2 :=
iInf_subtype'
@[simp] lemma biUnion_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋃ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biSup_const hs
@[simp] lemma biInter_const {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (t : Set β) : ⋂ a ∈ s, t = t :=
biInf_const hs
theorem iUnion_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋃ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋃ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iSup_subtype
theorem iInter_subtype (p : α → Prop) (s : { x // p x } → Set β) :
⋂ x : { x // p x }, s x = ⋂ (x) (hx : p x), s ⟨x, hx⟩ :=
iInf_subtype
theorem biInter_empty (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ (∅ : Set α), u x = univ :=
iInf_emptyset
theorem biInter_univ (u : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ @univ α, u x = ⋂ x, u x :=
iInf_univ
@[simp]
theorem biUnion_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ x ∈ s, s = s :=
Subset.antisymm (iUnion₂_subset fun _ _ => Subset.refl s) fun _ hx => mem_biUnion hx hx
@[simp]
theorem iUnion_nonempty_self (s : Set α) : ⋃ _ : s.Nonempty, s = s := by
rw [iUnion_nonempty_index, biUnion_self]
theorem biInter_singleton (a : α) (s : α → Set β) : ⋂ x ∈ ({a} : Set α), s x = s a :=
iInf_singleton
theorem biInter_union (s t : Set α) (u : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ s ∪ t, u x = (⋂ x ∈ s, u x) ∩ ⋂ x ∈ t, u x :=
iInf_union
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Lattice.lean | 677 | 678 | theorem biInter_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) (t : α → Set β) :
⋂ x ∈ insert a s, t x = t a ∩ ⋂ x ∈ s, t x := by | simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Defs
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported functions
Let `α N` be two Types, assume that `N` has a `0` and let `f g : α →₀ N` be finitely supported
functions.
## Main definition
* `Finsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N` is an additive group, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`Finsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α M N P : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : α →₀ N) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x => f x ≠ g x
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : α →₀ N} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } := by
ext
exact mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : α →₀ N} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h =>
ext fun a => not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h => h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : α →₀ N} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : α →₀ N).neLocus f = f.support :=
(neLocus_comm _ _).trans (neLocus_zero_right _)
end NHasZero
section NeLocusAndMaps
theorem subset_mapRange_neLocus [DecidableEq N] [Zero N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) : (f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) ⊆ f.neLocus g :=
fun x => by simpa only [mem_neLocus, mapRange_apply, not_imp_not] using congr_arg F
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_left [DecidableEq N] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f : α →₀ M) (g₁ g₂ : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ f, Function.Injective fun g => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f g₁).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f g₂) = g₁.neLocus g₂ := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_right [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [DecidableEq P] [Zero P] [Zero N]
{F : M → N → P} (F0 : F 0 0 = 0) (f₁ f₂ : α →₀ M) (g : α →₀ N)
(hF : ∀ g, Function.Injective fun f => F f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f₁ g).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f₂ g) = f₁.neLocus f₂ := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF _).ne_iff
theorem mapRange_neLocus_eq [DecidableEq N] [DecidableEq M] [Zero M] [Zero N] (f g : α →₀ N)
{F : N → M} (F0 : F 0 = 0) (hF : Function.Injective F) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) = f.neLocus g := by
ext
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using hF.ne_iff
end NeLocusAndMaps
variable [DecidableEq N]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_left [AddLeftCancelMonoid N] (f g h : α →₀ N) :
(f + g).neLocus (f + h) = g.neLocus h :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_left _ _ _ _ add_right_injective
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_right [AddRightCancelMonoid N] (f g h : α →₀ N) :
(f + h).neLocus (g + h) = f.neLocus g :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_right _ _ _ _ add_left_injective
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup N] (f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : α →₀ N)
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_neg_neg : neLocus (-f) (-g) = f.neLocus g :=
mapRange_neLocus_eq _ _ neg_zero neg_injective
theorem neLocus_neg : neLocus (-f) g = f.neLocus (-g) := by rw [← neLocus_neg_neg, neg_neg]
theorem neLocus_eq_support_sub : f.neLocus g = (f - g).support := by
rw [← neLocus_add_right _ _ (-g), add_neg_cancel, neLocus_zero_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_left : neLocus (f - g₁) (f - g₂) = neLocus g₁ g₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, neLocus_add_left, neLocus_neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_right : neLocus (f₁ - g) (f₂ - g) = neLocus f₁ f₂ := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using neLocus_add_right _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_self_add_right : neLocus f (f + g) = g.support := by
rw [← neLocus_zero_left, ← neLocus_add_left f 0 g, add_zero]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/NeLocus.lean | 141 | 141 | theorem neLocus_self_add_left : neLocus (f + g) f = g.support := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller, Rémi Bottinelli
-/
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Path
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
/-!
# Connectivity of subgraphs and induced graphs
## Main definitions
* `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Preconnected` and `SimpleGraph.Subgraph.Connected` give subgraphs
connectivity predicates via `SimpleGraph.subgraph.coe`.
-/
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u v
variable {V : Type u} {V' : Type v} {G : SimpleGraph V} {G' : SimpleGraph V'}
namespace Subgraph
/-- A subgraph is preconnected if it is preconnected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Preconnected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Preconnected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Preconnected H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨Preconnected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Preconnected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma preconnected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Preconnected ↔ H.coe.Preconnected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
/-- A subgraph is connected if it is connected when coerced to be a simple graph.
Note: This is a structure to make it so one can be precise about how dot notation resolves. -/
protected structure Connected (H : G.Subgraph) : Prop where
protected coe : H.coe.Connected
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : Coe H.Connected H.coe.Connected := ⟨Connected.coe⟩
instance {H : G.Subgraph} : CoeFun H.Connected (fun _ => ∀ u v : H.verts, H.coe.Reachable u v) :=
⟨fun h => h.coe⟩
protected lemma connected_iff' {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.coe.Connected := ⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => h, .mk⟩
protected lemma connected_iff {H : G.Subgraph} :
H.Connected ↔ H.Preconnected ∧ H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff', connected_iff, H.preconnected_iff, Set.nonempty_coe_sort]
protected lemma Connected.preconnected {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.Preconnected := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.1
protected lemma Connected.nonempty {H : G.Subgraph} (h : H.Connected) : H.verts.Nonempty := by
rw [H.connected_iff] at h; exact h.2
theorem singletonSubgraph_connected {v : V} : (G.singletonSubgraph v).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [singletonSubgraph_verts, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
subst_vars
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subgraphOfAdj_connected {v w : V} (hvw : G.Adj v w) : (G.subgraphOfAdj hvw).Connected := by
refine ⟨⟨?_⟩⟩
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
simp only [subgraphOfAdj_verts, Set.mem_insert_iff, Set.mem_singleton_iff] at ha hb
obtain rfl | rfl := ha <;> obtain rfl | rfl := hb <;>
first | rfl | (apply Adj.reachable; simp)
lemma top_induce_pair_connected_of_adj {u v : V} (huv : G.Adj u v) :
((⊤ : G.Subgraph).induce {u, v}).Connected := by
rw [← subgraphOfAdj_eq_induce huv]
exact subgraphOfAdj_connected huv
@[mono]
protected lemma Connected.mono {H H' : G.Subgraph} (hle : H ≤ H') (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
rw [← Subgraph.copy_eq H' H.verts hv H'.Adj rfl]
refine ⟨h.coe.mono ?_⟩
rintro ⟨v, hv⟩ ⟨w, hw⟩ hvw
exact hle.2 hvw
protected lemma Connected.mono' {H H' : G.Subgraph}
(hle : ∀ v w, H.Adj v w → H'.Adj v w) (hv : H.verts = H'.verts)
(h : H.Connected) : H'.Connected := by
exact h.mono ⟨hv.le, hle⟩ hv
protected lemma Connected.sup {H K : G.Subgraph}
(hH : H.Connected) (hK : K.Connected) (hn : (H ⊓ K).verts.Nonempty) :
(H ⊔ K).Connected := by
rw [Subgraph.connected_iff', connected_iff_exists_forall_reachable]
obtain ⟨u, hu, hu'⟩ := hn
exists ⟨u, Or.inl hu⟩
rintro ⟨v, (hv|hv)⟩
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_left : H ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hH ⟨u, hu⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
· exact Reachable.map (Subgraph.inclusion (le_sup_right : K ≤ H ⊔ K)) (hK ⟨u, hu'⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩)
/--
This lemma establishes a condition under which a subgraph is the same as a connected component.
Note the asymmetry in the hypothesis `h`: `v` is in `H.verts`, but `w` is not required to be.
-/
lemma Connected.exists_verts_eq_connectedComponentSupp {H : Subgraph G}
(hc : H.Connected) (h : ∀ v ∈ H.verts, ∀ w, G.Adj v w → H.Adj v w) :
∃ c : G.ConnectedComponent, H.verts = c.supp := by
rw [SimpleGraph.ConnectedComponent.exists]
obtain ⟨v, hv⟩ := hc.nonempty
use v
ext w
simp only [ConnectedComponent.mem_supp_iff, ConnectedComponent.eq]
exact ⟨fun hw ↦ by simpa using (hc ⟨w, hw⟩ ⟨v, hv⟩).map H.hom,
fun a ↦ a.symm.mem_subgraphVerts h hv⟩
end Subgraph
/-! ### Walks as subgraphs -/
namespace Walk
variable {u v w : V}
/-- The subgraph consisting of the vertices and edges of the walk. -/
@[simp]
protected def toSubgraph {u v : V} : G.Walk u v → G.Subgraph
| nil => G.singletonSubgraph u
| cons h p => G.subgraphOfAdj h ⊔ p.toSubgraph
theorem toSubgraph_cons_nil_eq_subgraphOfAdj (h : G.Adj u v) :
(cons h nil).toSubgraph = G.subgraphOfAdj h := by simp
theorem mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : w ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts ↔ w ∈ p.support := by
induction p with
| nil => simp
| cons h p' ih =>
rename_i x y z
have : w = y ∨ w ∈ p'.support ↔ w ∈ p'.support :=
⟨by rintro (rfl | h) <;> simp [*], by simp +contextual⟩
simp [ih, or_assoc, this]
lemma not_nil_of_adj_toSubgraph {u v} {x : V} {p : G.Walk u v} (hadj : p.toSubgraph.Adj w x) :
¬p.Nil := by
cases p <;> simp_all
lemma start_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : u ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
lemma end_mem_verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : v ∈ p.toSubgraph.verts := by
simp [mem_verts_toSubgraph]
@[simp]
theorem verts_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.verts = { w | w ∈ p.support } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_verts_toSubgraph
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Connectivity/Subgraph.lean | 162 | 167 | theorem mem_edges_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) {e : Sym2 V} :
e ∈ p.toSubgraph.edgeSet ↔ e ∈ p.edges := by | induction p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem edgeSet_toSubgraph (p : G.Walk u v) : p.toSubgraph.edgeSet = { e | e ∈ p.edges } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_edges_toSubgraph |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.ToSquareZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EssentialFiniteness
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
/-!
# The module of kaehler differentials
## Main results
- `KaehlerDifferential`: The module of kaehler differentials. For an `R`-algebra `S`, we provide
the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.D`: The derivation into the module of kaehler differentials.
- `KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation`: The image of `D` spans `Ω[S⁄R]` as an `S`-module.
- `KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation`:
The isomorphism `Hom_R(Ω[S⁄R], M) ≃ₗ[S] Der_R(S, M)`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.quotKerTotalEquiv`: An alternative description of `Ω[S⁄R]` as `S` copies
of `S` with kernel (`KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal`) generated by the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
- `KaehlerDifferential.map`: Given a map between the arrows `R →+* A` and `S →+* B`, we have an
`A`-linear map `Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄S]`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.map_surjective`:
The sequence `Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A] → 0` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_mapBaseChange_map`:
The sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_kerCotangentToTensor_mapBaseChange`:
If `A → B` is surjective with kernel `I`, then
the sequence `I/I² → B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.mapBaseChange_surjective`:
If `A → B` is surjective, then the sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → 0` is exact.
## Future project
- Define the `IsKaehlerDifferential` predicate.
-/
suppress_compilation
section KaehlerDifferential
open scoped TensorProduct
open Algebra Finsupp
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
/-- The kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`. -/
abbrev KaehlerDifferential.ideal : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) :=
RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S)
variable {S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal (a : S) :
(1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] a - a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) ∈ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable {R}
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- For a `R`-derivation `S → M`, this is the map `S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M` sending `s ⊗ₜ t ↦ s • D t`. -/
def Derivation.tensorProductTo (D : Derivation R S M) : S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift ((LinearMap.lsmul S (S →ₗ[R] M)).flip D.toLinearMap)
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul (D : Derivation R S M) (s t : S) :
D.tensorProductTo (s ⊗ₜ t) = s • D t := rfl
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul (D : Derivation R S M) (x y : S ⊗[R] S) :
D.tensorProductTo (x * y) =
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x • D.tensorProductTo y +
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R y • D.tensorProductTo x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [zero_mul, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x₁ x₂
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [mul_zero, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x y
simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo,
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul',
TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul]
dsimp
rw [D.leibniz]
simp only [smul_smul, smul_add, mul_comm (x * y) x₁, mul_right_comm x₁ x₂, ← mul_assoc]
variable (R S)
/-- The kernel of `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S` is generated by `1 ⊗ s - s ⊗ 1` as a `S`-module. -/
theorem KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal :
Submodule.span S (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· rintro x (hx : _ = _)
have : x - TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x := by
rw [hx, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]
rw [← this]
clear this hx
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [map_zero, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]; exact zero_mem _
· intro x y
have : x ⊗ₜ[R] y - (x * y) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x • ((1 : S) ⊗ₜ y - y ⊗ₜ (1 : S)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul, this]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ x ?_
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact Set.mem_range_self y
· intro x y hx hy
rw [map_add, TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← sub_add_sub_comm]
exact add_mem hx hy
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal :
Ideal.span (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· change (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S ≤ (Ideal.span _).restrictScalars S
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span]
conv_rhs => rw [← Submodule.span_span_of_tower S]
exact Submodule.subset_span
/-- The module of Kähler differentials (Kahler differentials, Kaehler differentials).
This is implemented as `I / I ^ 2` with `I` the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
To view elements as a linear combination of the form `s • D s'`, use
`KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective` and `Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul`.
We also provide the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
-/
def KaehlerDifferential : Type v :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance : AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential R S) := inferInstanceAs <|
AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance KaehlerDifferential.module : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential R S) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.moduleOfTower _
@[inherit_doc KaehlerDifferential]
notation:100 "Ω[" S "⁄" R "]" => KaehlerDifferential R S
instance : Nonempty (Ω[S⁄R]) := ⟨0⟩
instance KaehlerDifferential.module' {R' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [Algebra R' S]
[SMulCommClass R R' S] :
Module R' (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.module' _
instance : IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.isScalarTower _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower {R₁ R₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂]
[Algebra R₁ S] [Algebra R₂ S] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[SMulCommClass R R₁ S] [SMulCommClass R R₂ S] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ S] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower' : IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
/-- The quotient map `I → Ω[S⁄R]` with `I` being the kernel of `S ⊗[R] S → S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S →ₗ[S ⊗[R] S] Ω[S⁄R] :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
/-- (Implementation) The underlying linear map of the derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap : S →ₗ[R] Ω[S⁄R] :=
((KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal R S).restrictScalars R).comp
((TensorProduct.includeRight.toLinearMap - TensorProduct.includeLeft.toLinearMap :
S →ₗ[R] S ⊗[R] S).codRestrict
((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars R)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R) :
_ →ₗ[R] _)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
/-- The universal derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.D : Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
{ toLinearMap := KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S
map_one_eq_zero' := by
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply, Ideal.toCotangent_apply]
congr
rw [sub_self]
leibniz' := fun a b => by
have : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul { x // x ∈ ideal R S } (Ω[S⁄R]) S (S ⊗[R] S) := inferInstance
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply]
rw [← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← map_add (ideal R S).toCotangent, Ideal.toCotangent_eq, pow_two]
convert Submodule.mul_mem_mul (KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R a :)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R b :) using 1
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk,
TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_comm b, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower,
smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ring_nf }
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.D R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation :
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = ⊤ := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩ := Ideal.toCotangent_surjective _ x
have : x ∈ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := hx
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal] at this
suffices ∃ hx, (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) by
exact this.choose_spec
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x, ?_⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply R S x⟩
· exact ⟨zero_mem _, Submodule.zero_mem _⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; exact ⟨add_mem hx₁ hy₁, Submodule.add_mem _ hx₂ hy₂⟩
· rintro r x - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact ⟨((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S).smul_mem r hx₁,
Submodule.smul_mem _ r hx₂⟩
/-- `Ω[S⁄R]` is trivial if `R → S` is surjective.
Also see `Algebra.FormallyUnramified.iff_subsingleton_kaehlerDifferential`. -/
lemma KaehlerDifferential.subsingleton_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R S)) :
Subsingleton (Ω[S⁄R]) := by
suffices (⊤ : Submodule S (Ω[S⁄R])) ≤ ⊥ from
(subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).mpr fun y ↦ this trivial
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h x; simp
variable {R S}
/-- The linear map from `Ω[S⁄R]`, associated with a derivation. -/
def Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential (D : Derivation R S M) : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M := by
refine LinearMap.comp ((((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) •
(⊤ : Submodule (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S))).restrictScalars S).liftQ ?_ ?_)
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv S _).symm.toLinearMap
· exact D.tensorProductTo.comp ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).subtype.restrictScalars S)
· intro x hx
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on ((Submodule.restrictScalars_mem _ _ _).mp hx) ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx y -
rw [RingHom.mem_ker] at hx
dsimp
rw [Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul, hx, y.prop, zero_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· intro x y ex ey; rw [map_add, ex, ey, zero_add]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply (D : Derivation R S M) (x) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x) =
D.tensorProductTo x := rfl
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp (D : Derivation R S M) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = D := by
ext a
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.D_apply]
refine (D.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply _).trans ?_
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, map_sub, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul,
one_smul, D.map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp_D (D' : Derivation R S M) (x : S) :
D'.liftKaehlerDifferential (KaehlerDifferential.D R S x) = D' x :=
Derivation.congr_fun D'.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp x
@[ext]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique (f f' : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M)
(hf : f.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = f'.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) :
f = f' := by
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
have : x ∈ Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) := by
rw [KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation]; trivial
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact congr_arg (fun D : Derivation R S M => D x) hf
· rw [map_zero, map_zero]
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
· intro a x _ e; simp [e]
variable (R S)
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential = LinearMap.id :=
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential_comp
variable {R S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo (x : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo x =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x := by
rw [← Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply, Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D]
rfl
variable (R S)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective :
Function.Surjective (KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo := by
intro x; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent_surjective x
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo x⟩
/-- The `S`-linear maps from `Ω[S⁄R]` to `M` are (`S`-linearly) equivalent to `R`-derivations
from `S` to `M`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply apply_apply]
def KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation : (Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M) ≃ₗ[S] Derivation R S M :=
{ Derivation.llcomp.flip <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S with
invFun := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential
left_inv := fun _ =>
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _ (Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp _)
right_inv := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp }
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv :
(S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal ≃+*
S := by
have : Function.RightInverse (TensorProduct.includeLeft (R := R) (S := R) (A := S) (B := S))
(↑(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S) : S ⊗[R] S →+* S) := by
intro x; rw [AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, ← AlgHom.comp_apply, TensorProduct.lmul'_comp_includeLeft]
rfl
refine (Ideal.quotCotangent _).trans ?_
refine (Ideal.quotEquivOfEq ?_).trans (RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse this)
ext; rfl
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S` as an `S`-algebra. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdeal :
((S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal) ≃ₐ[S] S :=
{ KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S with
commutes' := (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).apply_symm_apply }
theorem KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux (f : S →ₐ[R] S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ ↔
(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S := by
rw [AlgHom.ext_iff, AlgHom.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
have e₁ : (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift (f x) =
KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal <| f x) := by
generalize f x = y; obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y; rfl
have e₂ :
x = KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ x) :=
(mul_one x).symm
constructor
· intro e
exact (e₁.trans (@RingEquiv.congr_arg _ _ _ _ _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S) _ _ e)).trans e₂.symm
· intro e; apply (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).injective
exact e₁.symm.trans (e.trans e₂)
/- Note: Lean is slow to synthesize these instances (times out).
Without them the endEquivDerivation' and endEquivAuxEquiv both have significant timeouts.
In Mathlib 3, it was slow but not this slow. -/
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance smul_SSmod_SSmod : SMul (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Mul.toSMul _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_S_right :
IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_R_right :
IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_SS_right : IsScalarTower (S ⊗[R] S)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instS : Module S (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instR : Module R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instSS : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- Derivations into `Ω[S⁄R]` is equivalent to derivations
into `(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal`. -/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' :
Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃ₗ[R] Derivation R S (ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
LinearEquiv.compDer ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentEquivIdeal.restrictScalars S)
/-- (Implementation) An `Equiv` version of `KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux`.
Used in `KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv :
{ f //
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ } ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv (KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux R S)
/--
The endomorphisms of `Ω[S⁄R]` corresponds to sections of the surjection `S ⊗[R] S ⧸ J ^ 2 →ₐ[R] S`,
with `J` being the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv :
Module.End S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(derivationToSquareZeroEquivLift (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal_square).trans <|
KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv R S
section Finiteness
theorem KaehlerDifferential.ideal_fg [EssFiniteType R S] :
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).FG := by
classical
use (EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S))
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Finset.coe_image, Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, _, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x
· rw [← KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
let I : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) := Ideal.span
((EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)))
show _ - _ ∈ I
have : (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (S ⊗[R] S) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ I)).comp TensorProduct.includeRight =
(IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (S ⊗[R] S) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ I)).comp TensorProduct.includeLeft := by
apply EssFiniteType.algHom_ext
intro a ha
simp only [AlgHom.coe_comp, IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq,
Function.comp_apply, TensorProduct.includeLeft_apply, TensorProduct.includeRight_apply,
Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem]
refine Ideal.subset_span ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
simpa [Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem] using AlgHom.congr_fun this x
instance KaehlerDifferential.finite [EssFiniteType R S] :
Module.Finite S (Ω[S⁄R]) := by
classical
let s := (EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ D R S s)
refine ⟨⟨s, top_le_iff.mp ?_⟩⟩
rw [← span_range_derivation, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
have : ∀ x ∈ adjoin R (EssFiniteType.finset R S).toSet,
.D _ _ x ∈ Submodule.span S s.toSet := by
intro x hx
refine adjoin_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx
· exact fun x hx ↦ Submodule.subset_span (Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· simp
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy ↦ (D R S).map_add x y ▸ add_mem hx hy
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
simp only [Derivation.leibniz]
exact add_mem (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hx)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht', hxt⟩ := (essFiniteType_cond_iff R S (EssFiniteType.finset R S)).mp
EssFiniteType.cond.choose_spec x
rw [show D R S x =
ht'.unit⁻¹ • (D R S (x * t) - x • D R S t) by simp [smul_smul, Units.smul_def]]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (sub_mem (this _ hxt) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (this _ ht)))
end Finiteness
section Presentation
open KaehlerDifferential (D)
open Finsupp (single)
/-- The `S`-submodule of `S →₀ S` (the direct sum of copies of `S` indexed by `S`) generated by
the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
where `db` is the unit in the copy of `S` with index `b`.
This is the kernel of the surjection
`Finsupp.linearCombination S Ω[S⁄R] S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)`.
See `KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_eq` and `KaehlerDifferential.linearCombination_surjective`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal : Submodule S (S →₀ S) :=
Submodule.span S
(((Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.1 1 + single x.2 1 - single (x.1 + x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.2 x.1 + single x.1 x.2 - single (x.1 * x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : R => single (algebraMap R S x) 1)
unsuppress_compilation in
-- Porting note: was `local notation x "𝖣" y => (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)`
-- but not having `DFunLike.coe` leads to `kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul` failing.
local notation3 x "𝖣" y => DFunLike.coe (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_add (x y z) : (z𝖣x + y) = (z𝖣x) + z𝖣y := by
rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)),
Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ z, ← smul_add, ← smul_sub]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inl <| Or.inl <| ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩))
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Kaehler/Basic.lean | 523 | 525 | theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul (x y z) :
(z𝖣x * y) = ((z * x)𝖣y) + (z * y)𝖣x := by | rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)), |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 512 | 516 | theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by | delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
/-!
# Double cosets
This file defines double cosets for two subgroups `H K` of a group `G` and the quotient of `G` by
the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K`. We also prove that `G` can be written as a disjoint
union of the double cosets and that if one of `H` or `K` is the trivial group (i.e. `⊥` ) then
this is the usual left or right quotient of a group by a subgroup.
## Main definitions
* `rel`: The double coset relation defined by two subgroups `H K` of `G`.
* `Doset.quotient`: The quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e, `H \ G / K`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {α : Type*} [Mul α]
open MulOpposite
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Doset
/-- The double coset as an element of `Set α` corresponding to `s a t` -/
def doset (a : α) (s t : Set α) : Set α :=
s * {a} * t
lemma doset_eq_image2 (a : α) (s t : Set α) : doset a s t = Set.image2 (· * a * ·) s t := by
simp_rw [doset, Set.mul_singleton, ← Set.image2_mul, Set.image2_image_left]
theorem mem_doset {s t : Set α} {a b : α} : b ∈ doset a s t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, b = x * a * y := by
simp only [doset_eq_image2, Set.mem_image2, eq_comm]
theorem mem_doset_self (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) : a ∈ doset a H K :=
mem_doset.mpr ⟨1, H.one_mem, 1, K.one_mem, (one_mul a).symm.trans (mul_one (1 * a)).symm⟩
theorem doset_eq_of_mem {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G} (hb : b ∈ doset a H K) :
doset b H K = doset a H K := by
obtain ⟨h, hh, k, hk, rfl⟩ := mem_doset.1 hb
rw [doset, doset, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, Subgroup.singleton_mul_subgroup hk, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
Subgroup.subgroup_mul_singleton hh]
theorem mem_doset_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : b ∈ doset a H K := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff] at h
simp only [mem_doset] at *
obtain ⟨x, ⟨l, hl, r, hr, hrx⟩, y, hy, ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨y⁻¹ * l, H.mul_mem (H.inv_mem hy) hl, r * r'⁻¹, K.mul_mem hr (K.inv_mem hr'), ?_⟩
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
theorem eq_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : doset a H K = doset b H K := by
rw [disjoint_comm] at h
have ha : a ∈ doset b H K := mem_doset_of_not_disjoint h
apply doset_eq_of_mem ha
/-- The setoid defined by the double_coset relation -/
def setoid (H K : Set G) : Setoid G :=
Setoid.ker fun x => doset x H K
/-- Quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K` -/
def Quotient (H K : Set G) : Type _ :=
_root_.Quotient (setoid H K)
theorem rel_iff {H K : Subgroup G} {x y : G} :
setoid ↑H ↑K x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ H, ∃ b ∈ K, y = a * x * b :=
Iff.trans
⟨fun (hxy : doset x H K = doset y H K) => hxy ▸ mem_doset_self H K y,
fun hxy => (doset_eq_of_mem hxy).symm⟩ mem_doset
theorem bot_rel_eq_leftRel (H : Subgroup G) :
⇑(setoid ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G) ↑H) = ⇑(QuotientGroup.leftRel H) := by
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl : a = 1, b, hb, rfl⟩
rwa [one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_left]
· rintro (h : a⁻¹ * b ∈ H)
exact ⟨1, rfl, a⁻¹ * b, h, by rw [one_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left]⟩
theorem rel_bot_eq_right_group_rel (H : Subgroup G) :
⇑(setoid ↑H ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G)) = ⇑(QuotientGroup.rightRel H) := by
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, hb, a, rfl : a = 1, rfl⟩
rwa [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_right]
· rintro (h : b * a⁻¹ ∈ H)
exact ⟨b * a⁻¹, h, 1, rfl, by rw [mul_one, inv_mul_cancel_right]⟩
/-- Create a doset out of an element of `H \ G / K` -/
def quotToDoset (H K : Subgroup G) (q : Quotient (H : Set G) K) : Set G :=
doset q.out H K
/-- Map from `G` to `H \ G / K` -/
abbrev mk (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) : Quotient (H : Set G) K :=
Quotient.mk'' a
instance (H K : Subgroup G) : Inhabited (Quotient (H : Set G) K) :=
⟨mk H K (1 : G)⟩
theorem eq (H K : Subgroup G) (a b : G) :
mk H K a = mk H K b ↔ ∃ h ∈ H, ∃ k ∈ K, b = h * a * k := by
rw [Quotient.eq'']
apply rel_iff
theorem out_eq' (H K : Subgroup G) (q : Quotient ↑H ↑K) : mk H K q.out = q :=
Quotient.out_eq' q
theorem mk_out_eq_mul (H K : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ h k : G, h ∈ H ∧ k ∈ K ∧ (mk H K g : Quotient ↑H ↑K).out = h * g * k := by
have := eq H K (mk H K g : Quotient ↑H ↑K).out g
rw [out_eq'] at this
obtain ⟨h, h_h, k, hk, T⟩ := this.1 rfl
refine ⟨h⁻¹, k⁻¹, H.inv_mem h_h, K.inv_mem hk, eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq ?_)⟩
rw [← mul_assoc, ← T]
theorem mk_eq_of_doset_eq {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G} (h : doset a H K = doset b H K) :
mk H K a = mk H K b := by
rw [eq]
exact mem_doset.mp (h.symm ▸ mem_doset_self H K b)
theorem disjoint_out {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : Quotient H K} :
a ≠ b → Disjoint (doset a.out H K) (doset b.out (H : Set G) K) := by
contrapose!
intro h
simpa [out_eq'] using mk_eq_of_doset_eq (eq_of_not_disjoint h)
theorem union_quotToDoset (H K : Subgroup G) : ⋃ q, quotToDoset H K q = Set.univ := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, quotToDoset, mem_doset, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop, Set.mem_univ,
iff_true]
use mk H K x
obtain ⟨h, k, h3, h4, h5⟩ := mk_out_eq_mul H K x
refine ⟨h⁻¹, H.inv_mem h3, k⁻¹, K.inv_mem h4, ?_⟩
simp only [h5, Subgroup.coe_mk, ← mul_assoc, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel, mul_inv_cancel_right]
theorem doset_union_rightCoset (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) :
⋃ k : K, op (a * k) • ↑H = doset a H K := by
ext x
simp only [mem_rightCoset_iff, exists_prop, mul_inv_rev, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_doset,
Subgroup.mem_carrier, SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, h_h⟩
refine ⟨x * (y⁻¹ * a⁻¹), h_h, y, y.2, ?_⟩
simp only [← mul_assoc, Subgroup.coe_mk, inv_mul_cancel_right, InvMemClass.coe_inv]
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [hxy, ← mul_assoc, hx, mul_inv_cancel_right, Subgroup.coe_mk]
theorem doset_union_leftCoset (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) :
⋃ h : H, (h * a : G) • ↑K = doset a H K := by
ext x
simp only [mem_leftCoset_iff, mul_inv_rev, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_doset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, h_h⟩
refine ⟨y, y.2, a⁻¹ * y⁻¹ * x, h_h, ?_⟩
simp only [← mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_inv_cancel, mul_inv_cancel_right, InvMemClass.coe_inv]
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [hxy, ← mul_assoc, hy, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel, Subgroup.coe_mk, inv_mul_cancel_right]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/DoubleCoset.lean | 172 | 183 | theorem left_bot_eq_left_quot (H : Subgroup G) :
Quotient (⊥ : Subgroup G) (H : Set G) = (G ⧸ H) := by | unfold Quotient
congr
ext
simp_rw [← bot_rel_eq_leftRel H]
theorem right_bot_eq_right_quot (H : Subgroup G) :
Quotient (H : Set G) (⊥ : Subgroup G) = _root_.Quotient (QuotientGroup.rightRel H) := by
unfold Quotient
congr
ext |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa, Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.DFinsupp.Defs
/-!
# Locus of unequal values of finitely supported dependent functions
Let `N : α → Type*` be a type family, assume that `N a` has a `0` for all `a : α` and let
`f g : Π₀ a, N a` be finitely supported dependent functions.
## Main definition
* `DFinsupp.neLocus f g : Finset α`, the finite subset of `α` where `f` and `g` differ.
In the case in which `N a` is an additive group for all `a`, `DFinsupp.neLocus f g` coincides with
`DFinsupp.support (f - g)`.
-/
variable {α : Type*} {N : α → Type*}
namespace DFinsupp
variable [DecidableEq α]
section NHasZero
variable [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, Zero (N a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
/-- Given two finitely supported functions `f g : α →₀ N`, `Finsupp.neLocus f g` is the `Finset`
where `f` and `g` differ. This generalizes `(f - g).support` to situations without subtraction. -/
def neLocus (f g : Π₀ a, N a) : Finset α :=
(f.support ∪ g.support).filter fun x ↦ f x ≠ g x
@[simp]
theorem mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∈ f.neLocus g ↔ f a ≠ g a := by
simpa only [neLocus, Finset.mem_filter, Finset.mem_union, mem_support_iff,
and_iff_right_iff_imp] using Ne.ne_or_ne _
theorem not_mem_neLocus {f g : Π₀ a, N a} {a : α} : a ∉ f.neLocus g ↔ f a = g a :=
mem_neLocus.not.trans not_ne_iff
@[simp]
theorem coe_neLocus : ↑(f.neLocus g) = { x | f x ≠ g x } :=
Set.ext fun _x ↦ mem_neLocus
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_eq_empty {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : f.neLocus g = ∅ ↔ f = g :=
⟨fun h ↦
ext fun a ↦ not_not.mp (mem_neLocus.not.mp (Finset.eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.mp h a)),
fun h ↦ h ▸ by simp only [neLocus, Ne, eq_self_iff_true, not_true, Finset.filter_False]⟩
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_neLocus_iff {f g : Π₀ a, N a} : (f.neLocus g).Nonempty ↔ f ≠ g :=
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.trans neLocus_eq_empty.not
theorem neLocus_comm : f.neLocus g = g.neLocus f := by
simp_rw [neLocus, Finset.union_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_right : f.neLocus 0 = f.support := by
ext
rw [mem_neLocus, mem_support_iff, coe_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_zero_left : (0 : Π₀ a, N a).neLocus f = f.support :=
(neLocus_comm _ _).trans (neLocus_zero_right _)
end NHasZero
section NeLocusAndMaps
variable {M P : α → Type*} [∀ a, Zero (N a)] [∀ a, Zero (M a)] [∀ a, Zero (P a)]
theorem subset_mapRange_neLocus [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
{F : ∀ a, N a → M a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 = 0) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) ⊆ f.neLocus g := fun a ↦ by
simpa only [mem_neLocus, mapRange_apply, not_imp_not] using congr_arg (F a)
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_left [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (P a)]
{F : ∀ a, M a → N a → P a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 0 = 0) (f : Π₀ a, M a) (g₁ g₂ : Π₀ a, N a)
(hF : ∀ a f, Function.Injective fun g ↦ F a f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f g₁).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f g₂) = g₁.neLocus g₂ := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a _).ne_iff
theorem zipWith_neLocus_eq_right [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (P a)]
{F : ∀ a, M a → N a → P a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 0 = 0) (f₁ f₂ : Π₀ a, M a) (g : Π₀ a, N a)
(hF : ∀ a g, Function.Injective fun f ↦ F a f g) :
(zipWith F F0 f₁ g).neLocus (zipWith F F0 f₂ g) = f₁.neLocus f₂ := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a _).ne_iff
theorem mapRange_neLocus_eq [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)] [∀ a, DecidableEq (M a)] (f g : Π₀ a, N a)
{F : ∀ a, N a → M a} (F0 : ∀ a, F a 0 = 0) (hF : ∀ a, Function.Injective (F a)) :
(f.mapRange F F0).neLocus (g.mapRange F F0) = f.neLocus g := by
ext a
simpa only [mem_neLocus] using (hF a).ne_iff
end NeLocusAndMaps
variable [∀ a, DecidableEq (N a)]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_left [∀ a, AddLeftCancelMonoid (N a)] (f g h : Π₀ a, N a) :
(f + g).neLocus (f + h) = g.neLocus h :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_left _ _ _ _ fun _a ↦ add_right_injective
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_add_right [∀ a, AddRightCancelMonoid (N a)] (f g h : Π₀ a, N a) :
(f + h).neLocus (g + h) = f.neLocus g :=
zipWith_neLocus_eq_right _ _ _ _ fun _a ↦ add_left_injective
section AddGroup
variable [∀ a, AddGroup (N a)] (f f₁ f₂ g g₁ g₂ : Π₀ a, N a)
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_neg_neg : neLocus (-f) (-g) = f.neLocus g :=
mapRange_neLocus_eq _ _ (fun _a ↦ neg_zero) fun _a ↦ neg_injective
theorem neLocus_neg : neLocus (-f) g = f.neLocus (-g) := by rw [← neLocus_neg_neg, neg_neg]
theorem neLocus_eq_support_sub : f.neLocus g = (f - g).support := by
rw [← @neLocus_add_right α N _ _ _ _ _ (-g), add_neg_cancel, neLocus_zero_right, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_left : neLocus (f - g₁) (f - g₂) = neLocus g₁ g₂ := by
simp only [sub_eq_add_neg, @neLocus_add_left α N _ _ _, neLocus_neg_neg]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_sub_right : neLocus (f₁ - g) (f₂ - g) = neLocus f₁ f₂ := by
simpa only [sub_eq_add_neg] using @neLocus_add_right α N _ _ _ _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_self_add_right : neLocus f (f + g) = g.support := by
rw [← neLocus_zero_left, ← @neLocus_add_left α N _ _ _ f 0 g, add_zero]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_self_add_left : neLocus (f + g) f = g.support := by
rw [neLocus_comm, neLocus_self_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem neLocus_self_sub_right : neLocus f (f - g) = g.support := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, neLocus_self_add_right, support_neg]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/DFinsupp/NeLocus.lean | 150 | 151 | theorem neLocus_self_sub_left : neLocus (f - g) f = g.support := by | rw [neLocus_comm, neLocus_self_sub_right] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Kenny Lau, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro, Kevin Buzzard,
Amelia Livingston, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.FreeMonoid.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Idempotent
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Nat.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.MulOpposite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Submonoid.Operations
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Submonoids: membership criteria
In this file we prove various facts about membership in a submonoid:
* `pow_mem`, `nsmul_mem`: if `x ∈ S` where `S` is a multiplicative (resp., additive) submonoid and
`n` is a natural number, then `x^n` (resp., `n • x`) belongs to `S`;
* `mem_iSup_of_directed`, `coe_iSup_of_directed`, `mem_sSup_of_directedOn`,
`coe_sSup_of_directedOn`: the supremum of a directed collection of submonoid is their union.
* `sup_eq_range`, `mem_sup`: supremum of two submonoids `S`, `T` of a commutative monoid is the set
of products;
* `closure_singleton_eq`, `mem_closure_singleton`, `mem_closure_pair`: the multiplicative (resp.,
additive) closure of `{x}` consists of powers (resp., natural multiples) of `x`, and a similar
result holds for the closure of `{x, y}`.
## Tags
submonoid, submonoids
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {M A B : Type*}
section Assoc
variable [Monoid M] [SetLike B M] [SubmonoidClass B M] {S : B}
end Assoc
section NonAssoc
variable [MulOneClass M]
open Set
namespace Submonoid
-- TODO: this section can be generalized to `[SubmonoidClass B M] [CompleteLattice B]`
-- such that `CompleteLattice.LE` coincides with `SetLike.LE`
@[to_additive]
theorem mem_iSup_of_directed {ι} [hι : Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Submonoid M} (hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S)
{x : M} : (x ∈ ⨆ i, S i) ↔ ∃ i, x ∈ S i := by
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨i, hi⟩ ↦ le_iSup S i hi⟩
suffices x ∈ closure (⋃ i, (S i : Set M)) → ∃ i, x ∈ S i by
simpa only [closure_iUnion, closure_eq (S _)] using this
refine closure_induction (fun _ ↦ mem_iUnion.1) ?_ ?_
· exact hι.elim fun i ↦ ⟨i, (S i).one_mem⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨i, hi⟩ ⟨j, hj⟩
rcases hS i j with ⟨k, hki, hkj⟩
exact ⟨k, (S k).mul_mem (hki hi) (hkj hj)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem coe_iSup_of_directed {ι} [Nonempty ι] {S : ι → Submonoid M} (hS : Directed (· ≤ ·) S) :
((⨆ i, S i : Submonoid M) : Set M) = ⋃ i, S i :=
Set.ext fun x ↦ by simp [mem_iSup_of_directed hS]
@[to_additive]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Group/Submonoid/Membership.lean | 73 | 76 | theorem mem_sSup_of_directedOn {S : Set (Submonoid M)} (Sne : S.Nonempty)
(hS : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) S) {x : M} : x ∈ sSup S ↔ ∃ s ∈ S, x ∈ s := by | haveI : Nonempty S := Sne.to_subtype
simp [sSup_eq_iSup', mem_iSup_of_directed hS.directed_val, SetCoe.exists, Subtype.coe_mk] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Basis.Basic
/-!
# Towers of algebras
We set up the basic theory of algebra towers.
An algebra tower A/S/R is expressed by having instances of `Algebra A S`,
`Algebra R S`, `Algebra R A` and `IsScalarTower R S A`, the later asserting the
compatibility condition `(r • s) • a = r • (s • a)`.
In `FieldTheory/Tower.lean` we use this to prove the tower law for finite extensions,
that if `R` and `S` are both fields, then `[A:R] = [A:S] [S:A]`.
In this file we prepare the main lemma:
if `{bi | i ∈ I}` is an `R`-basis of `S` and `{cj | j ∈ J}` is an `S`-basis
of `A`, then `{bi cj | i ∈ I, j ∈ J}` is an `R`-basis of `A`. This statement does not require the
base rings to be a field, so we also generalize the lemma to rings in this file.
-/
open Pointwise
variable (R S A B : Type*)
namespace IsScalarTower
section Semiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [Semiring A] [Semiring B]
variable [Algebra R S] [Algebra S A] [Algebra S B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
variable [IsScalarTower R S A] [IsScalarTower R S B]
/-- Suppose that `R → S → A` is a tower of algebras.
If an element `r : R` is invertible in `S`, then it is invertible in `A`. -/
def Invertible.algebraTower (r : R) [Invertible (algebraMap R S r)] :
Invertible (algebraMap R A r) :=
Invertible.copy (Invertible.map (algebraMap S A) (algebraMap R S r)) (algebraMap R A r)
(IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply R S A r)
/-- A natural number that is invertible when coerced to `R` is also invertible
when coerced to any `R`-algebra. -/
def invertibleAlgebraCoeNat (n : ℕ) [inv : Invertible (n : R)] : Invertible (n : A) :=
haveI : Invertible (algebraMap ℕ R n) := inv
Invertible.algebraTower ℕ R A n
end Semiring
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B]
variable [Algebra R A] [Algebra A B] [Algebra R B] [IsScalarTower R A B]
end CommSemiring
end IsScalarTower
section AlgebraMapCoeffs
variable {R} {ι M : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [Semiring A] [AddCommMonoid M]
variable [Algebra R A] [Module A M] [Module R M] [IsScalarTower R A M]
variable (b : Basis ι R M) (h : Function.Bijective (algebraMap R A))
/-- If `R` and `A` have a bijective `algebraMap R A` and act identically on `M`,
then a basis for `M` as `R`-module is also a basis for `M` as `R'`-module. -/
@[simps! repr_apply_support_val repr_apply_toFun]
noncomputable def Basis.algebraMapCoeffs : Basis ι A M :=
b.mapCoeffs (RingEquiv.ofBijective _ h) fun c x => by simp
theorem Basis.algebraMapCoeffs_apply (i : ι) : b.algebraMapCoeffs A h i = b i :=
b.mapCoeffs_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem Basis.coe_algebraMapCoeffs : (b.algebraMapCoeffs A h : ι → M) = b :=
b.coe_mapCoeffs _ _
end AlgebraMapCoeffs
section Semiring
open Finsupp
variable {R S A}
variable [Semiring R] [Semiring S] [AddCommMonoid A]
variable [Module R S] [Module S A] [Module R A] [IsScalarTower R S A]
theorem linearIndependent_smul {ι : Type*} {b : ι → S} {ι' : Type*} {c : ι' → A}
(hb : LinearIndependent R b) (hc : LinearIndependent S c) :
LinearIndependent R fun p : ι × ι' ↦ b p.1 • c p.2 := by
rw [← linearIndependent_equiv' (.prodComm ..) (g := fun p : ι' × ι ↦ b p.2 • c p.1) rfl,
LinearIndependent, linearCombination_smul]
simpa using Function.Injective.comp hc
((mapRange_injective _ (map_zero _) hb).comp <| Equiv.injective _)
variable (R)
-- LinearIndependent is enough if S is a ring rather than semiring.
theorem Basis.isScalarTower_of_nonempty {ι} [Nonempty ι] (b : Basis ι S A) : IsScalarTower R S S :=
(b.repr.symm.comp <| lsingle <| Classical.arbitrary ι).isScalarTower_of_injective R
(b.repr.symm.injective.comp <| single_injective _)
theorem Basis.isScalarTower_finsupp {ι} (b : Basis ι S A) : IsScalarTower R S (ι →₀ S) :=
b.repr.symm.isScalarTower_of_injective R b.repr.symm.injective
variable {R} {ι ι' : Type*} (b : Basis ι R S) (c : Basis ι' S A)
/-- `Basis.smulTower (b : Basis ι R S) (c : Basis ι S A)` is the `R`-basis on `A`
where the `(i, j)`th basis vector is `b i • c j`. -/
noncomputable
def Basis.smulTower : Basis (ι × ι') R A :=
haveI := c.isScalarTower_finsupp R
.ofRepr
(c.repr.restrictScalars R ≪≫ₗ
(Finsupp.lcongr (Equiv.refl _) b.repr ≪≫ₗ
((finsuppProdLEquiv R).symm ≪≫ₗ
Finsupp.lcongr (Equiv.prodComm ι' ι) (LinearEquiv.refl _ _))))
@[simp]
theorem Basis.smulTower_repr (x ij) :
(b.smulTower c).repr x ij = b.repr (c.repr x ij.2) ij.1 := by
simp [smulTower]
theorem Basis.smulTower_repr_mk (x i j) : (b.smulTower c).repr x (i, j) = b.repr (c.repr x j) i :=
b.smulTower_repr c x (i, j)
@[simp]
theorem Basis.smulTower_apply (ij) : (b.smulTower c) ij = b ij.1 • c ij.2 := by
classical
obtain ⟨i, j⟩ := ij
rw [Basis.apply_eq_iff]
ext ⟨i', j'⟩
rw [Basis.smulTower_repr, LinearEquiv.map_smul, Basis.repr_self, Finsupp.smul_apply,
Finsupp.single_apply]
dsimp only
split_ifs with hi
· simp [hi, Finsupp.single_apply]
· simp [hi]
/-- `Basis.smulTower (b : Basis ι R S) (c : Basis ι S A)` is the `R`-basis on `A`
where the `(i, j)`th basis vector is `b j • c i`. -/
noncomputable def Basis.smulTower' : Basis (ι' × ι) R A :=
(b.smulTower c).reindex (.prodComm ..)
| Mathlib/RingTheory/AlgebraTower.lean | 149 | 151 | theorem Basis.smulTower'_repr (x ij) :
(b.smulTower' c).repr x ij = b.repr (c.repr x ij.1) ij.2 := by | rw [smulTower', repr_reindex_apply, smulTower_repr]; rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ZetaValues
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.RiemannZeta
/-!
# Special values of Hurwitz and Riemann zeta functions
This file gives the formula for `ζ (2 * k)`, for `k` a non-zero integer, in terms of Bernoulli
numbers. More generally, we give formulae for any Hurwitz zeta functions at any (strictly) negative
integer in terms of Bernoulli polynomials.
(Note that most of the actual work for these formulae is done elsewhere, in
`Mathlib.NumberTheory.ZetaValues`. This file has only those results which really need the
definition of Hurwitz zeta and related functions, rather than working directly with the defining
sums in the convergence range.)
## Main results
- `hurwitzZeta_neg_nat`: for `k : ℕ` with `k ≠ 0`, and any `x ∈ ℝ / ℤ`, the special value
`hurwitzZeta x (-k)` is equal to `-(Polynomial.bernoulli (k + 1) x) / (k + 1)`.
- `riemannZeta_neg_nat_eq_bernoulli` : for any `k ∈ ℕ` we have the formula
`riemannZeta (-k) = (-1) ^ k * bernoulli (k + 1) / (k + 1)`
- `riemannZeta_two_mul_nat`: formula for `ζ(2 * k)` for `k ∈ ℕ, k ≠ 0` in terms of Bernoulli
numbers
## TODO
* Extend to cover Dirichlet L-functions.
* The formulae are correct for `s = 0` as well, but we do not prove this case, since this requires
Fourier series which are only conditionally convergent, which is difficult to approach using the
methods in the library at the present time (May 2024).
-/
open Complex Real Set
open scoped Nat
namespace HurwitzZeta
variable {k : ℕ} {x : ℝ}
/-- Express the value of `cosZeta` at a positive even integer as a value
of the Bernoulli polynomial. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaValues.lean | 49 | 67 | theorem cosZeta_two_mul_nat (hk : k ≠ 0) (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 1) :
cosZeta x (2 * k) = (-1) ^ (k + 1) * (2 * π) ^ (2 * k) / 2 / (2 * k)! *
((Polynomial.bernoulli (2 * k)).map (algebraMap ℚ ℂ)).eval (x : ℂ) := by | rw [← (hasSum_nat_cosZeta x (?_ : 1 < re (2 * k))).tsum_eq]
· refine Eq.trans ?_ <|
(congr_arg ofReal (hasSum_one_div_nat_pow_mul_cos hk hx).tsum_eq).trans ?_
· rw [ofReal_tsum]
refine tsum_congr fun n ↦ ?_
norm_cast
ring_nf
· push_cast
congr 1
have : (Polynomial.bernoulli (2 * k)).map (algebraMap ℚ ℂ) = _ :=
(Polynomial.map_map (algebraMap ℚ ℝ) ofRealHom _).symm
rw [this, ← ofRealHom_eq_coe, ← ofRealHom_eq_coe]
apply Polynomial.map_aeval_eq_aeval_map (by simp)
· norm_cast
omega |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Minor.Restrict
/-!
# Some constructions of matroids
This file defines some very elementary examples of matroids, namely those with at most one base.
## Main definitions
* `emptyOn α` is the matroid on `α` with empty ground set.
For `E : Set α`, ...
* `loopyOn E` is the matroid on `E` whose elements are all loops, or equivalently in which `∅`
is the only base.
* `freeOn E` is the 'free matroid' whose ground set `E` is the only base.
* For `I ⊆ E`, `uniqueBaseOn I E` is the matroid with ground set `E` in which `I` is the only base.
## Implementation details
To avoid the tedious process of certifying the matroid axioms for each of these easy examples,
we bootstrap the definitions starting with `emptyOn α` (which `simp` can prove is a matroid)
and then construct the other examples using duality and restriction.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {E B I X R J : Set α}
namespace Matroid
open Set
section EmptyOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with empty ground set. -/
def emptyOn (α : Type*) : Matroid α where
E := ∅
IsBase := (· = ∅)
Indep := (· = ∅)
indep_iff' := by simp [subset_empty_iff]
exists_isBase := ⟨∅, rfl⟩
isBase_exchange := by rintro _ _ rfl; simp
maximality := by rintro _ _ _ rfl -; exact ⟨∅, by simp [Maximal]⟩
subset_ground := by simp
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_ground : (emptyOn α).E = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_isBase_iff : (emptyOn α).IsBase B ↔ B = ∅ := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_indep_iff : (emptyOn α).Indep I ↔ I = ∅ := Iff.rfl
theorem ground_eq_empty_iff : (M.E = ∅) ↔ M = emptyOn α := by
simp only [emptyOn, ext_iff_indep, iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ by simp [h, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_dual_eq : (emptyOn α)✶ = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]; rfl
@[simp] theorem restrict_empty (M : Matroid α) : M ↾ (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
theorem eq_emptyOn_or_nonempty (M : Matroid α) : M = emptyOn α ∨ Matroid.Nonempty M := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
exact M.E.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (fun h ↦ Or.inr ⟨h⟩)
theorem eq_emptyOn [IsEmpty α] (M : Matroid α) : M = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
exact M.E.eq_empty_of_isEmpty
instance finite_emptyOn (α : Type*) : (emptyOn α).Finite :=
⟨finite_empty⟩
end EmptyOn
section LoopyOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with ground set `E` whose only base is `∅`.
The elements are all 'loops' - see `Matroid.IsLoop` and `Matroid.loopyOn_isLoop_iff`. -/
def loopyOn (E : Set α) : Matroid α := emptyOn α ↾ E
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_ground (E : Set α) : (loopyOn E).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_empty (α : Type*) : loopyOn (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff, loopyOn_ground]
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_indep_iff : (loopyOn E).Indep I ↔ I = ∅ := by
simp only [loopyOn, restrict_indep_iff, emptyOn_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
rintro rfl; apply empty_subset
theorem eq_loopyOn_iff : M = loopyOn E ↔ M.E = E ∧ ∀ X ⊆ M.E, M.Indep X → X = ∅ := by
simp only [ext_iff_indep, loopyOn_ground, loopyOn_indep_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
rintro rfl
refine ⟨fun h I hI ↦ (h hI).1, fun h I hIE ↦ ⟨h I hIE, by rintro rfl; simp⟩⟩
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_isBase_iff : (loopyOn E).IsBase B ↔ B = ∅ := by
simp [Maximal, isBase_iff_maximal_indep]
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_isBasis_iff : (loopyOn E).IsBasis I X ↔ I = ∅ ∧ X ⊆ E :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨loopyOn_indep_iff.mp h.indep, h.subset_ground⟩,
by rintro ⟨rfl, hX⟩; rw [isBasis_iff]; simp⟩
instance : RankFinite (loopyOn E) :=
⟨⟨∅, loopyOn_isBase_iff.2 rfl, finite_empty⟩⟩
theorem Finite.loopyOn_finite (hE : E.Finite) : Matroid.Finite (loopyOn E) :=
⟨hE⟩
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_restrict (E R : Set α) : (loopyOn E) ↾ R = loopyOn R := by
refine ext_indep rfl ?_
simp only [restrict_ground_eq, restrict_indep_iff, loopyOn_indep_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
exact fun _ h _ ↦ h
theorem empty_isBase_iff : M.IsBase ∅ ↔ M = loopyOn M.E := by
simp only [isBase_iff_maximal_indep, Maximal, empty_indep, le_eq_subset, empty_subset,
subset_empty_iff, true_implies, true_and, ext_iff_indep, loopyOn_ground,
loopyOn_indep_iff]
exact ⟨fun h I _ ↦ ⟨@h _, fun hI ↦ by simp [hI]⟩, fun h I hI ↦ (h hI.subset_ground).1 hI⟩
theorem eq_loopyOn_or_rankPos (M : Matroid α) : M = loopyOn M.E ∨ RankPos M := by
rw [← empty_isBase_iff, rankPos_iff]; apply em
theorem not_rankPos_iff : ¬RankPos M ↔ M = loopyOn M.E := by
rw [rankPos_iff, not_iff_comm, empty_isBase_iff]
instance loopyOn_rankFinite : RankFinite (loopyOn E) :=
⟨∅, by simp⟩
end LoopyOn
section FreeOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with ground set `E` whose only base is `E`. -/
def freeOn (E : Set α) : Matroid α := (loopyOn E)✶
@[simp] theorem freeOn_ground : (freeOn E).E = E := rfl
@[simp] theorem freeOn_dual_eq : (freeOn E)✶ = loopyOn E := by
rw [freeOn, dual_dual]
@[simp] theorem loopyOn_dual_eq : (loopyOn E)✶ = freeOn E := rfl
@[simp] theorem freeOn_empty (α : Type*) : freeOn (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
simp [freeOn]
@[simp] theorem freeOn_isBase_iff : (freeOn E).IsBase B ↔ B = E := by
simp only [freeOn, loopyOn_ground, dual_isBase_iff', loopyOn_isBase_iff, diff_eq_empty,
← subset_antisymm_iff, eq_comm (a := E)]
@[simp] theorem freeOn_indep_iff : (freeOn E).Indep I ↔ I ⊆ E := by
simp [indep_iff]
theorem freeOn_indep (hIE : I ⊆ E) : (freeOn E).Indep I :=
freeOn_indep_iff.2 hIE
@[simp] theorem freeOn_isBasis_iff : (freeOn E).IsBasis I X ↔ I = X ∧ X ⊆ E := by
use fun h ↦ ⟨(freeOn_indep h.subset_ground).eq_of_isBasis h ,h.subset_ground⟩
rintro ⟨rfl, hIE⟩
exact (freeOn_indep hIE).isBasis_self
@[simp] theorem freeOn_isBasis'_iff : (freeOn E).IsBasis' I X ↔ I = X ∩ E := by
rw [isBasis'_iff_isBasis_inter_ground, freeOn_isBasis_iff, freeOn_ground,
and_iff_left inter_subset_right]
theorem eq_freeOn_iff : M = freeOn E ↔ M.E = E ∧ M.Indep E := by
refine ⟨?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; simp [Subset.rfl]
simp only [ext_iff_indep, freeOn_ground, freeOn_indep_iff, h.1, true_and]
exact fun I hIX ↦ iff_of_true (h.2.subset hIX) hIX
theorem ground_indep_iff_eq_freeOn : M.Indep M.E ↔ M = freeOn M.E := by
simp [eq_freeOn_iff]
theorem freeOn_restrict (h : R ⊆ E) : (freeOn E) ↾ R = freeOn R := by
simp [h, eq_freeOn_iff, Subset.rfl]
theorem restrict_eq_freeOn_iff : M ↾ I = freeOn I ↔ M.Indep I := by
rw [eq_freeOn_iff, and_iff_right M.restrict_ground_eq, restrict_indep_iff,
and_iff_left Subset.rfl]
theorem Indep.restrict_eq_freeOn (hI : M.Indep I) : M ↾ I = freeOn I := by
rwa [restrict_eq_freeOn_iff]
instance freeOn_finitary : Finitary (freeOn E) := by
simp only [finitary_iff, freeOn_indep_iff]
exact fun I h e heI ↦ by simpa using h {e} (by simpa)
lemma freeOn_rankPos (hE : E.Nonempty) : RankPos (freeOn E) := by
simp [rankPos_iff, hE.ne_empty.symm]
end FreeOn
section uniqueBaseOn
/-- The matroid on `E` whose unique base is the subset `I` of `E`.
Intended for use when `I ⊆ E`; if this not not the case, then the base is `I ∩ E`. -/
def uniqueBaseOn (I E : Set α) : Matroid α := freeOn I ↾ E
@[simp] theorem uniqueBaseOn_ground : (uniqueBaseOn I E).E = E :=
rfl
theorem uniqueBaseOn_isBase_iff (hIE : I ⊆ E) : (uniqueBaseOn I E).IsBase B ↔ B = I := by
rw [uniqueBaseOn, isBase_restrict_iff', freeOn_isBasis'_iff, inter_eq_self_of_subset_right hIE]
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Constructions.lean | 211 | 215 | theorem uniqueBaseOn_inter_ground_eq (I E : Set α) :
uniqueBaseOn (I ∩ E) E = uniqueBaseOn I E := by | simp only [uniqueBaseOn, restrict_eq_restrict_iff, freeOn_indep_iff, subset_inter_iff,
iff_self_and]
tauto |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Anne Baanen. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Invertible
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Defs
/-!
# Theorems about invertible elements in rings
-/
universe u
variable {R : Type u}
/-- `-⅟a` is the inverse of `-a` -/
def invertibleNeg [Mul R] [One R] [HasDistribNeg R] (a : R) [Invertible a] : Invertible (-a) :=
⟨-⅟ a, by simp, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem invOf_neg [Monoid R] [HasDistribNeg R] (a : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible (-a)] :
⅟ (-a) = -⅟ a :=
invOf_eq_right_inv (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem one_sub_invOf_two [Ring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] : 1 - (⅟ 2 : R) = ⅟ 2 :=
(isUnit_of_invertible (2 : R)).mul_right_inj.1 <| by
rw [mul_sub, mul_invOf_self, mul_one, ← one_add_one_eq_two, add_sub_cancel_right]
@[simp]
theorem invOf_two_add_invOf_two [NonAssocSemiring R] [Invertible (2 : R)] :
(⅟ 2 : R) + (⅟ 2 : R) = 1 := by rw [← two_mul, mul_invOf_self]
theorem pos_of_invertible_cast [NonAssocSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] (n : ℕ) [Invertible (n : R)] :
0 < n :=
Nat.zero_lt_of_ne_zero fun h => Invertible.ne_zero (n : R) (h ▸ Nat.cast_zero)
theorem invOf_add_invOf [Semiring R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] :
⅟a + ⅟b = ⅟a * (a + b) * ⅟b := by
rw [mul_add, invOf_mul_self, add_mul, one_mul, mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, mul_one, add_comm]
/-- A version of `inv_sub_inv'` for `invOf`. -/
theorem invOf_sub_invOf [Ring R] (a b : R) [Invertible a] [Invertible b] :
⅟a - ⅟b = ⅟a * (b - a) * ⅟b := by
rw [mul_sub, invOf_mul_self, sub_mul, one_mul, mul_assoc, mul_invOf_self, mul_one]
/-- A version of `inv_add_inv'` for `Ring.inverse`. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Ring/Invertible.lean | 49 | 51 | theorem Ring.inverse_add_inverse [Semiring R] {a b : R} (h : IsUnit a ↔ IsUnit b) :
Ring.inverse a + Ring.inverse b = Ring.inverse a * (a + b) * Ring.inverse b := by | by_cases ha : IsUnit a |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Units.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
import Mathlib.Lean.Meta.CongrTheorems
import Mathlib.Tactic.Contrapose
import Mathlib.Tactic.Nontriviality
import Mathlib.Tactic.Spread
import Mathlib.Util.AssertExists
/-!
# Lemmas about units in a `MonoidWithZero` or a `GroupWithZero`.
We also define `Ring.inverse`, a globally defined function on any ring
(in fact any `MonoidWithZero`), which inverts units and sends non-units to zero.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists DenselyOrdered Equiv Subtype.restrict Multiplicative
variable {α M₀ G₀ : Type*}
variable [MonoidWithZero M₀]
namespace Units
/-- An element of the unit group of a nonzero monoid with zero represented as an element
of the monoid is nonzero. -/
@[simp]
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] (u : M₀ˣ) : (u : M₀) ≠ 0 :=
left_ne_zero_of_mul_eq_one u.mul_inv
-- We can't use `mul_eq_zero` + `Units.ne_zero` in the next two lemmas because we don't assume
-- `Nonzero M₀`.
@[simp]
theorem mul_left_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : a * u = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_left h ↑u⁻¹, fun h => mul_eq_zero_of_left h u⟩
@[simp]
theorem mul_right_eq_zero (u : M₀ˣ) {a : M₀} : ↑u * a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by simpa using mul_eq_zero_of_right (↑u⁻¹) h, mul_eq_zero_of_right (u : M₀)⟩
end Units
namespace IsUnit
theorem ne_zero [Nontrivial M₀] {a : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a ≠ 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.ne_zero
theorem mul_right_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (ha : IsUnit a) : a * b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := ha
hu ▸ u.mul_right_eq_zero
theorem mul_left_eq_zero {a b : M₀} (hb : IsUnit b) : a * b = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
let ⟨u, hu⟩ := hb
hu ▸ u.mul_left_eq_zero
end IsUnit
@[simp]
theorem isUnit_zero_iff : IsUnit (0 : M₀) ↔ (0 : M₀) = 1 :=
⟨fun ⟨⟨_, a, (a0 : 0 * a = 1), _⟩, rfl⟩ => by rwa [zero_mul] at a0, fun h =>
@isUnit_of_subsingleton _ _ (subsingleton_of_zero_eq_one h) 0⟩
theorem not_isUnit_zero [Nontrivial M₀] : ¬IsUnit (0 : M₀) :=
mt isUnit_zero_iff.1 zero_ne_one
namespace Ring
open Classical in
/-- Introduce a function `inverse` on a monoid with zero `M₀`, which sends `x` to `x⁻¹` if `x` is
invertible and to `0` otherwise. This definition is somewhat ad hoc, but one needs a fully (rather
than partially) defined inverse function for some purposes, including for calculus.
Note that while this is in the `Ring` namespace for brevity, it requires the weaker assumption
`MonoidWithZero M₀` instead of `Ring M₀`. -/
noncomputable def inverse : M₀ → M₀ := fun x => if h : IsUnit x then ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) else 0
/-- By definition, if `x` is invertible then `inverse x = x⁻¹`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_unit (u : M₀ˣ) : inverse (u : M₀) = (u⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) := by
rw [inverse, dif_pos u.isUnit, IsUnit.unit_of_val_units]
theorem inverse_of_isUnit {x : M₀} (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x = ((h.unit⁻¹ : M₀ˣ) : M₀) := dif_pos h
/-- By definition, if `x` is not invertible then `inverse x = 0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem inverse_non_unit (x : M₀) (h : ¬IsUnit x) : inverse x = 0 :=
dif_neg h
theorem mul_inverse_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * inverse x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.mul_inv]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel (x : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * x = 1 := by
rcases h with ⟨u, rfl⟩
rw [inverse_unit, Units.inv_mul]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * x * inverse x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem inverse_mul_cancel_right (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : y * inverse x * x = y := by
rw [mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, mul_one]
theorem mul_inverse_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : x * (inverse x * y) = y := by
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_inverse_cancel x h, one_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/GroupWithZero/Units/Basic.lean | 113 | 115 | theorem inverse_mul_cancel_left (x y : M₀) (h : IsUnit x) : inverse x * (x * y) = y := by | rw [← mul_assoc, inverse_mul_cancel x h, one_mul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.LineDeriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.WithSeminorms
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.ZeroAtInfty
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.JapaneseBracket
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformFilterBasis
import Mathlib.Tactic.MoveAdd
/-!
# Schwartz space
This file defines the Schwartz space. Usually, the Schwartz space is defined as the set of smooth
functions $f : ℝ^n → ℂ$ such that there exists $C_{αβ} > 0$ with $$|x^α ∂^β f(x)| < C_{αβ}$$ for
all $x ∈ ℝ^n$ and for all multiindices $α, β$.
In mathlib, we use a slightly different approach and define the Schwartz space as all
smooth functions `f : E → F`, where `E` and `F` are real normed vector spaces such that for all
natural numbers `k` and `n` we have uniform bounds `‖x‖^k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ < C`.
This approach completely avoids using partial derivatives as well as polynomials.
We construct the topology on the Schwartz space by a family of seminorms, which are the best
constants in the above estimates. The abstract theory of topological vector spaces developed in
`SeminormFamily.moduleFilterBasis` and `WithSeminorms.toLocallyConvexSpace` turns the
Schwartz space into a locally convex topological vector space.
## Main definitions
* `SchwartzMap`: The Schwartz space is the space of smooth functions such that all derivatives
decay faster than any power of `‖x‖`.
* `SchwartzMap.seminorm`: The family of seminorms as described above
* `SchwartzMap.compCLM`: Composition with a function on the right as a continuous linear map
`𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(D, F)`, provided that the function is temperate and grows polynomially near
infinity
* `SchwartzMap.fderivCLM`: The differential as a continuous linear map
`𝓢(E, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(E, E →L[ℝ] F)`
* `SchwartzMap.derivCLM`: The one-dimensional derivative as a continuous linear map
`𝓢(ℝ, F) →L[𝕜] 𝓢(ℝ, F)`
* `SchwartzMap.integralCLM`: Integration as a continuous linear map `𝓢(ℝ, F) →L[ℝ] F`
## Main statements
* `SchwartzMap.instIsUniformAddGroup` and `SchwartzMap.instLocallyConvexSpace`: The Schwartz space
is a locally convex topological vector space.
* `SchwartzMap.one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply`: For a Schwartz function `f` there is a uniform bound
on `(1 + ‖x‖) ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖`.
## Implementation details
The implementation of the seminorms is taken almost literally from `ContinuousLinearMap.opNorm`.
## Notation
* `𝓢(E, F)`: The Schwartz space `SchwartzMap E F` localized in `SchwartzSpace`
## Tags
Schwartz space, tempered distributions
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Nat NNReal ContDiff
variable {𝕜 𝕜' D E F G V : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F]
variable (E F)
/-- A function is a Schwartz function if it is smooth and all derivatives decay faster than
any power of `‖x‖`. -/
structure SchwartzMap where
toFun : E → F
smooth' : ContDiff ℝ ∞ toFun
decay' : ∀ k n : ℕ, ∃ C : ℝ, ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n toFun x‖ ≤ C
/-- A function is a Schwartz function if it is smooth and all derivatives decay faster than
any power of `‖x‖`. -/
scoped[SchwartzMap] notation "𝓢(" E ", " F ")" => SchwartzMap E F
variable {E F}
namespace SchwartzMap
instance instFunLike : FunLike 𝓢(E, F) E F where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
/-- All derivatives of a Schwartz function are rapidly decaying. -/
theorem decay (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (k n : ℕ) :
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ C := by
rcases f.decay' k n with ⟨C, hC⟩
exact ⟨max C 1, by positivity, fun x => (hC x).trans (le_max_left _ _)⟩
/-- Every Schwartz function is smooth. -/
theorem smooth (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (n : ℕ∞) : ContDiff ℝ n f :=
f.smooth'.of_le (mod_cast le_top)
/-- Every Schwartz function is continuous. -/
@[continuity]
protected theorem continuous (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : Continuous f :=
(f.smooth 0).continuous
instance instContinuousMapClass : ContinuousMapClass 𝓢(E, F) E F where
map_continuous := SchwartzMap.continuous
/-- Every Schwartz function is differentiable. -/
protected theorem differentiable (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : Differentiable ℝ f :=
(f.smooth 1).differentiable rfl.le
/-- Every Schwartz function is differentiable at any point. -/
protected theorem differentiableAt (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {x : E} : DifferentiableAt ℝ f x :=
f.differentiable.differentiableAt
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} (h : ∀ x, (f : E → F) x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
section IsBigO
open Asymptotics Filter
variable (f : 𝓢(E, F))
/-- Auxiliary lemma, used in proving the more general result `isBigO_cocompact_rpow`. -/
theorem isBigO_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat (k : ℕ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ (-k : ℤ) := by
obtain ⟨d, _, hd'⟩ := f.decay k 0
simp only [norm_iteratedFDeriv_zero] at hd'
simp_rw [Asymptotics.IsBigO, Asymptotics.IsBigOWith]
refine ⟨d, Filter.Eventually.filter_mono Filter.cocompact_le_cofinite ?_⟩
refine (Filter.eventually_cofinite_ne 0).mono fun x hx => ?_
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (zpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _), zpow_neg, ← div_eq_mul_inv, le_div_iff₀']
exacts [hd' x, zpow_pos (norm_pos_iff.mpr hx) _]
theorem isBigO_cocompact_rpow [ProperSpace E] (s : ℝ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ s := by
let k := ⌈-s⌉₊
have hk : -(k : ℝ) ≤ s := neg_le.mp (Nat.le_ceil (-s))
refine (isBigO_cocompact_zpow_neg_nat f k).trans ?_
suffices (fun x : ℝ => x ^ (-k : ℤ)) =O[atTop] fun x : ℝ => x ^ s
from this.comp_tendsto tendsto_norm_cocompact_atTop
simp_rw [Asymptotics.IsBigO, Asymptotics.IsBigOWith]
refine ⟨1, (Filter.eventually_ge_atTop 1).mono fun x hx => ?_⟩
rw [one_mul, Real.norm_of_nonneg (Real.rpow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hx) _),
Real.norm_of_nonneg (zpow_nonneg (zero_le_one.trans hx) _), ← Real.rpow_intCast, Int.cast_neg,
Int.cast_natCast]
exact Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hk
theorem isBigO_cocompact_zpow [ProperSpace E] (k : ℤ) :
f =O[cocompact E] fun x => ‖x‖ ^ k := by
simpa only [Real.rpow_intCast] using isBigO_cocompact_rpow f k
end IsBigO
section Aux
theorem bounds_nonempty (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
∃ c : ℝ, c ∈ { c : ℝ | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x : E, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c } :=
let ⟨M, hMp, hMb⟩ := f.decay k n
⟨M, le_of_lt hMp, hMb⟩
theorem bounds_bddBelow (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
BddBelow { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c } :=
⟨0, fun _ ⟨hn, _⟩ => hn⟩
theorem decay_add_le_aux (k n : ℕ) (f g : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n ((f : E → F) + (g : E → F)) x‖ ≤
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ + ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n g x‖ := by
rw [← mul_add]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left ?_ (by positivity)
rw [iteratedFDeriv_add_apply (f.smooth _).contDiffAt (g.smooth _).contDiffAt]
exact norm_add_le _ _
theorem decay_neg_aux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (-f : E → F) x‖ = ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ := by
rw [iteratedFDeriv_neg_apply, norm_neg]
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
theorem decay_smul_aux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (c : 𝕜) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (c • (f : E → F)) x‖ =
‖c‖ * ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ := by
rw [mul_comm ‖c‖, mul_assoc, iteratedFDeriv_const_smul_apply (f.smooth _).contDiffAt,
norm_smul c (iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (⇑f) x)]
end Aux
section SeminormAux
/-- Helper definition for the seminorms of the Schwartz space. -/
protected def seminormAux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : ℝ :=
sInf { c | 0 ≤ c ∧ ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ c }
theorem seminormAux_nonneg (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) : 0 ≤ f.seminormAux k n :=
le_csInf (bounds_nonempty k n f) fun _ ⟨hx, _⟩ => hx
theorem le_seminormAux (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n (⇑f) x‖ ≤ f.seminormAux k n :=
le_csInf (bounds_nonempty k n f) fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h x
/-- If one controls the norm of every `A x`, then one controls the norm of `A`. -/
theorem seminormAux_le_bound (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ M) : f.seminormAux k n ≤ M :=
csInf_le (bounds_bddBelow k n f) ⟨hMp, hM⟩
end SeminormAux
/-! ### Algebraic properties -/
section SMul
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] [NormedField 𝕜'] [NormedSpace 𝕜' F]
[SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜' F]
instance instSMul : SMul 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := fun k n => by
refine ⟨f.seminormAux k n * (‖c‖ + 1), fun x => ?_⟩
have hc : 0 ≤ ‖c‖ := by positivity
refine le_trans ?_ ((mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (f.le_seminormAux k n x) hc).trans ?_)
· apply Eq.le
rw [mul_comm _ ‖c‖, ← mul_assoc]
exact decay_smul_aux k n f c x
· apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ (f.seminormAux_nonneg k n)
linarith }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {f : 𝓢(E, F)} {c : 𝕜} {x : E} : (c • f) x = c • f x :=
rfl
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul 𝕜 𝕜'] [IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' F] : IsScalarTower 𝕜 𝕜' 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext fun x => smul_assoc a b (f x)⟩
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' F] : SMulCommClass 𝕜 𝕜' 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun a b f => ext fun x => smul_comm a b (f x)⟩
theorem seminormAux_smul_le (k n : ℕ) (c : 𝕜) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) :
(c • f).seminormAux k n ≤ ‖c‖ * f.seminormAux k n := by
refine
(c • f).seminormAux_le_bound k n (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _))
fun x => (decay_smul_aux k n f c x).le.trans ?_
rw [mul_assoc]
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (norm_nonneg _)
instance instNSMul : SMul ℕ 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := by simpa [← Nat.cast_smul_eq_nsmul ℝ] using ((c : ℝ) • f).decay' }⟩
instance instZSMul : SMul ℤ 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ toFun := c • (f : E → F)
smooth' := (f.smooth _).const_smul c
decay' := by simpa [← Int.cast_smul_eq_zsmul ℝ] using ((c : ℝ) • f).decay' }⟩
end SMul
section Zero
instance instZero : Zero 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨{ toFun := fun _ => 0
smooth' := contDiff_const
decay' := fun _ _ => ⟨1, fun _ => by simp⟩ }⟩
instance instInhabited : Inhabited 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨0⟩
theorem coe_zero : DFunLike.coe (0 : 𝓢(E, F)) = (0 : E → F) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeFn_zero : ⇑(0 : 𝓢(E, F)) = (0 : E → F) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply {x : E} : (0 : 𝓢(E, F)) x = 0 :=
rfl
theorem seminormAux_zero (k n : ℕ) : (0 : 𝓢(E, F)).seminormAux k n = 0 :=
le_antisymm (seminormAux_le_bound k n _ rfl.le fun _ => by simp [Pi.zero_def])
(seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _)
end Zero
section Neg
instance instNeg : Neg 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f =>
⟨-f, (f.smooth _).neg, fun k n =>
⟨f.seminormAux k n, fun x => (decay_neg_aux k n f x).le.trans (f.le_seminormAux k n x)⟩⟩⟩
end Neg
section Add
instance instAdd : Add 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f + g, (f.smooth _).add (g.smooth _), fun k n =>
⟨f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n, fun x =>
(decay_add_le_aux k n f g x).trans
(add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x))⟩⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} {x : E} : (f + g) x = f x + g x :=
rfl
theorem seminormAux_add_le (k n : ℕ) (f g : 𝓢(E, F)) :
(f + g).seminormAux k n ≤ f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n :=
(f + g).seminormAux_le_bound k n
(add_nonneg (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _) (seminormAux_nonneg _ _ _)) fun x =>
(decay_add_le_aux k n f g x).trans <|
add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x)
end Add
section Sub
instance instSub : Sub 𝓢(E, F) :=
⟨fun f g =>
⟨f - g, (f.smooth _).sub (g.smooth _), by
intro k n
refine ⟨f.seminormAux k n + g.seminormAux k n, fun x => ?_⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add (f.le_seminormAux k n x) (g.le_seminormAux k n x))
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
rw [← decay_neg_aux k n g x]
convert decay_add_le_aux k n f (-g) x⟩⟩
-- exact fails with deterministic timeout
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply {f g : 𝓢(E, F)} {x : E} : (f - g) x = f x - g x :=
rfl
end Sub
section AddCommGroup
instance instAddCommGroup : AddCommGroup 𝓢(E, F) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => rfl
variable (E F)
/-- Coercion as an additive homomorphism. -/
def coeHom : 𝓢(E, F) →+ E → F where
toFun f := f
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' _ _ := rfl
variable {E F}
theorem coe_coeHom : (coeHom E F : 𝓢(E, F) → E → F) = DFunLike.coe :=
rfl
theorem coeHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeHom E F) := by
rw [coe_coeHom]
exact DFunLike.coe_injective
end AddCommGroup
section Module
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
instance instModule : Module 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
coeHom_injective.module 𝕜 (coeHom E F) fun _ _ => rfl
end Module
section Seminorms
/-! ### Seminorms on Schwartz space -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
variable (𝕜)
/-- The seminorms of the Schwartz space given by the best constants in the definition of
`𝓢(E, F)`. -/
protected def seminorm (k n : ℕ) : Seminorm 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) :=
Seminorm.ofSMulLE (SchwartzMap.seminormAux k n) (seminormAux_zero k n) (seminormAux_add_le k n)
(seminormAux_smul_le k n)
/-- If one controls the seminorm for every `x`, then one controls the seminorm. -/
theorem seminorm_le_bound (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, ‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ M) : SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f ≤ M :=
f.seminormAux_le_bound k n hMp hM
/-- If one controls the seminorm for every `x`, then one controls the seminorm.
Variant for functions `𝓢(ℝ, F)`. -/
theorem seminorm_le_bound' (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(ℝ, F)) {M : ℝ} (hMp : 0 ≤ M)
(hM : ∀ x, |x| ^ k * ‖iteratedDeriv n f x‖ ≤ M) : SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f ≤ M := by
refine seminorm_le_bound 𝕜 k n f hMp ?_
simpa only [Real.norm_eq_abs, norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv]
/-- The seminorm controls the Schwartz estimate for any fixed `x`. -/
theorem le_seminorm (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
‖x‖ ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤ SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f :=
f.le_seminormAux k n x
/-- The seminorm controls the Schwartz estimate for any fixed `x`.
Variant for functions `𝓢(ℝ, F)`. -/
theorem le_seminorm' (k n : ℕ) (f : 𝓢(ℝ, F)) (x : ℝ) :
|x| ^ k * ‖iteratedDeriv n f x‖ ≤ SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k n f := by
have := le_seminorm 𝕜 k n f x
rwa [← Real.norm_eq_abs, ← norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv]
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (n : ℕ) (x₀ : E) :
‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 n) f := by
have := SchwartzMap.le_seminorm 𝕜 0 n f x₀
rwa [pow_zero, one_mul] at this
theorem norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (k : ℕ) (x₀ : E) :
‖x₀‖ ^ k * ‖f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 k 0) f := by
have := SchwartzMap.le_seminorm 𝕜 k 0 f x₀
rwa [norm_iteratedFDeriv_zero] at this
theorem norm_le_seminorm (f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x₀ : E) : ‖f x₀‖ ≤ (SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 0) f := by
have := norm_pow_mul_le_seminorm 𝕜 f 0 x₀
rwa [pow_zero, one_mul] at this
variable (E F)
/-- The family of Schwartz seminorms. -/
def _root_.schwartzSeminormFamily : SeminormFamily 𝕜 𝓢(E, F) (ℕ × ℕ) :=
fun m => SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 m.1 m.2
@[simp]
theorem schwartzSeminormFamily_apply (n k : ℕ) :
schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F (n, k) = SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 n k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem schwartzSeminormFamily_apply_zero :
schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F 0 = SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 0 0 :=
rfl
variable {𝕜 E F}
/-- A more convenient version of `le_sup_seminorm_apply`.
The set `Finset.Iic m` is the set of all pairs `(k', n')` with `k' ≤ m.1` and `n' ≤ m.2`.
Note that the constant is far from optimal. -/
theorem one_add_le_sup_seminorm_apply {m : ℕ × ℕ} {k n : ℕ} (hk : k ≤ m.1) (hn : n ≤ m.2)
(f : 𝓢(E, F)) (x : E) :
(1 + ‖x‖) ^ k * ‖iteratedFDeriv ℝ n f x‖ ≤
2 ^ m.1 * (Finset.Iic m).sup (fun m => SchwartzMap.seminorm 𝕜 m.1 m.2) f := by
rw [add_comm, add_pow]
simp only [one_pow, mul_one, Finset.sum_congr, Finset.sum_mul]
norm_cast
rw [← Nat.sum_range_choose m.1]
push_cast
rw [Finset.sum_mul]
have hk' : Finset.range (k + 1) ⊆ Finset.range (m.1 + 1) := by
rwa [Finset.range_subset, add_le_add_iff_right]
refine le_trans (Finset.sum_le_sum_of_subset_of_nonneg hk' fun _ _ _ => by positivity) ?_
gcongr ∑ _i ∈ Finset.range (m.1 + 1), ?_ with i hi
move_mul [(Nat.choose k i : ℝ), (Nat.choose m.1 i : ℝ)]
gcongr
· apply (le_seminorm 𝕜 i n f x).trans
apply Seminorm.le_def.1
exact Finset.le_sup_of_le (Finset.mem_Iic.2 <|
Prod.mk_le_mk.2 ⟨Finset.mem_range_succ_iff.mp hi, hn⟩) le_rfl
· exact mod_cast Nat.choose_le_choose i hk
end Seminorms
section Topology
/-! ### The topology on the Schwartz space -/
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F] [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F]
variable (𝕜 E F)
instance instTopologicalSpace : TopologicalSpace 𝓢(E, F) :=
(schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F).moduleFilterBasis.topology'
| Mathlib/Analysis/Distribution/SchwartzSpace.lean | 488 | 491 | theorem _root_.schwartz_withSeminorms : WithSeminorms (schwartzSeminormFamily 𝕜 E F) := by | have A : WithSeminorms (schwartzSeminormFamily ℝ E F) := ⟨rfl⟩
rw [SeminormFamily.withSeminorms_iff_nhds_eq_iInf] at A ⊢
rw [A] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.AffineSpace.AffineMap
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
/-!
# Slope of a function
In this file we define the slope of a function `f : k → PE` taking values in an affine space over
`k` and prove some basic theorems about `slope`. The `slope` function naturally appears in the Mean
Value Theorem, and in the proof of the fact that a function with nonnegative second derivative on an
interval is convex on this interval.
## Tags
affine space, slope
-/
open AffineMap
variable {k E PE : Type*} [Field k] [AddCommGroup E] [Module k E] [AddTorsor E PE]
/-- `slope f a b = (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a)` is the slope of a function `f` on the interval
`[a, b]`. Note that `slope f a a = 0`, not the derivative of `f` at `a`. -/
def slope (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : E :=
(b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a)
theorem slope_fun_def (f : k → PE) : slope f = fun a b => (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b -ᵥ f a) :=
rfl
theorem slope_def_field (f : k → k) (a b : k) : slope f a b = (f b - f a) / (b - a) :=
(div_eq_inv_mul _ _).symm
theorem slope_fun_def_field (f : k → k) (a : k) : slope f a = fun b => (f b - f a) / (b - a) :=
(div_eq_inv_mul _ _).symm
@[simp]
theorem slope_same (f : k → PE) (a : k) : (slope f a a : E) = 0 := by
rw [slope, sub_self, inv_zero, zero_smul]
theorem slope_def_module (f : k → E) (a b : k) : slope f a b = (b - a)⁻¹ • (f b - f a) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sub_smul_slope (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : (b - a) • slope f a b = f b -ᵥ f a := by
rcases eq_or_ne a b with (rfl | hne)
· rw [sub_self, zero_smul, vsub_self]
· rw [slope, smul_inv_smul₀ (sub_ne_zero.2 hne.symm)]
theorem sub_smul_slope_vadd (f : k → PE) (a b : k) : (b - a) • slope f a b +ᵥ f a = f b := by
rw [sub_smul_slope, vsub_vadd]
@[simp]
theorem slope_vadd_const (f : k → E) (c : PE) : (slope fun x => f x +ᵥ c) = slope f := by
ext a b
simp only [slope, vadd_vsub_vadd_cancel_right, vsub_eq_sub]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/AffineSpace/Slope.lean | 62 | 63 | theorem slope_sub_smul (f : k → E) {a b : k} (h : a ≠ b) :
slope (fun x => (x - a) • f x) a b = f b := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Nodup
import Mathlib.Data.List.Infix
import Mathlib.Data.Quot
/-!
# List rotation
This file proves basic results about `List.rotate`, the list rotation.
## Main declarations
* `List.IsRotated l₁ l₂`: States that `l₁` is a rotated version of `l₂`.
* `List.cyclicPermutations l`: The list of all cyclic permutants of `l`, up to the length of `l`.
## Tags
rotated, rotation, permutation, cycle
-/
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open Nat Function
namespace List
theorem rotate_mod (l : List α) (n : ℕ) : l.rotate (n % l.length) = l.rotate n := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate n = [] := by simp [rotate]
@[simp]
theorem rotate_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate 0 = l := by simp [rotate]
theorem rotate'_nil (n : ℕ) : ([] : List α).rotate' n = [] := by simp
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/List/Rotate.lean | 45 | 45 | theorem rotate'_zero (l : List α) : l.rotate' 0 = l := by | cases l <;> rfl |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Leonardo de Moura. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.List.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Prod.Basic
/-!
# Lists in product and sigma types
This file proves basic properties of `List.product` and `List.sigma`, which are list constructions
living in `Prod` and `Sigma` types respectively. Their definitions can be found in
[`Data.List.Defs`](./defs). Beware, this is not about `List.prod`, the multiplicative product.
-/
variable {α β : Type*}
namespace List
/-! ### product -/
@[simp]
theorem nil_product (l : List β) : (@nil α) ×ˢ l = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_cons (a : α) (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
(a :: l₁) ×ˢ l₂ = map (fun b => (a, b)) l₂ ++ (l₁ ×ˢ l₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem product_nil : ∀ l : List α, l ×ˢ (@nil β) = []
| [] => rfl
| _ :: l => by simp [product_cons, product_nil l]
@[simp]
theorem mem_product {l₁ : List α} {l₂ : List β} {a : α} {b : β} :
(a, b) ∈ l₁ ×ˢ l₂ ↔ a ∈ l₁ ∧ b ∈ l₂ := by
simp_all [SProd.sprod, product, mem_flatMap, mem_map, Prod.ext_iff, exists_prop, and_left_comm,
exists_and_left, exists_eq_left, exists_eq_right]
| Mathlib/Data/List/ProdSigma.lean | 45 | 48 | theorem length_product (l₁ : List α) (l₂ : List β) :
length (l₁ ×ˢ l₂) = length l₁ * length l₂ := by | induction' l₁ with x l₁ IH
· exact (Nat.zero_mul _).symm |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.BumpFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.EqHaar
/-!
# Normed bump function
In this file we define `ContDiffBump.normed f μ` to be the bump function `f` normalized so that
`∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1` and prove some properties of this function.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Filter Set Metric MeasureTheory Module Measure
open scoped Topology
namespace ContDiffBump
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E] [HasContDiffBump E]
[MeasurableSpace E] {c : E} (f : ContDiffBump c) {x : E} {n : ℕ∞} {μ : Measure E}
/-- A bump function normed so that `∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1`. -/
protected def normed (μ : Measure E) : E → ℝ := fun x => f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ
theorem normed_def {μ : Measure E} (x : E) : f.normed μ x = f x / ∫ x, f x ∂μ :=
rfl
theorem nonneg_normed (x : E) : 0 ≤ f.normed μ x :=
div_nonneg f.nonneg <| integral_nonneg f.nonneg'
theorem contDiff_normed {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiff ℝ n (f.normed μ) :=
f.contDiff.div_const _
theorem continuous_normed : Continuous (f.normed μ) :=
f.continuous.div_const _
theorem normed_sub (x : E) : f.normed μ (c - x) = f.normed μ (c + x) := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.sub]
theorem normed_neg (f : ContDiffBump (0 : E)) (x : E) : f.normed μ (-x) = f.normed μ x := by
simp_rw [f.normed_def, f.neg]
variable [BorelSpace E] [FiniteDimensional ℝ E] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ]
protected theorem integrable : Integrable f μ :=
f.continuous.integrable_of_hasCompactSupport f.hasCompactSupport
protected theorem integrable_normed : Integrable (f.normed μ) μ :=
f.integrable.div_const _
section
variable [μ.IsOpenPosMeasure]
theorem integral_pos : 0 < ∫ x, f x ∂μ := by
refine (integral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg f.nonneg' f.integrable).mpr ?_
rw [f.support_eq]
exact measure_ball_pos μ c f.rOut_pos
theorem integral_normed : ∫ x, f.normed μ x ∂μ = 1 := by
simp_rw [ContDiffBump.normed, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm (f _), ← smul_eq_mul, integral_smul]
exact inv_mul_cancel₀ f.integral_pos.ne'
theorem support_normed_eq : Function.support (f.normed μ) = Metric.ball c f.rOut := by
unfold ContDiffBump.normed
rw [support_div, f.support_eq, support_const f.integral_pos.ne', inter_univ]
theorem tsupport_normed_eq : tsupport (f.normed μ) = Metric.closedBall c f.rOut := by
rw [tsupport, f.support_normed_eq, closure_ball _ f.rOut_pos.ne']
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/BumpFunction/Normed.lean | 75 | 77 | theorem hasCompactSupport_normed : HasCompactSupport (f.normed μ) := by | simp only [HasCompactSupport, f.tsupport_normed_eq (μ := μ), isCompact_closedBall] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Defs
/-!
# One-dimensional iterated derivatives
We define the `n`-th derivative of a function `f : 𝕜 → F` as a function
`iteratedDeriv n f : 𝕜 → F`, as well as a version on domains `iteratedDerivWithin n f s : 𝕜 → F`,
and prove their basic properties.
## Main definitions and results
Let `𝕜` be a nontrivially normed field, and `F` a normed vector space over `𝕜`. Let `f : 𝕜 → F`.
* `iteratedDeriv n f` is the `n`-th derivative of `f`, seen as a function from `𝕜` to `F`.
It is defined as the `n`-th Fréchet derivative (which is a multilinear map) applied to the
vector `(1, ..., 1)`, to take advantage of all the existing framework, but we show that it
coincides with the naive iterative definition.
* `iteratedDeriv_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` is obtained by starting
from `f` and differentiating it `n` times.
* `iteratedDerivWithin n f s` is the `n`-th derivative of `f` within the domain `s`. It only
behaves well when `s` has the unique derivative property.
* `iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate` states that the `n`-th derivative of `f` in the domain `s` is
obtained by starting from `f` and differentiating it `n` times within `s`. This only holds when
`s` has the unique derivative property.
## Implementation details
The results are deduced from the corresponding results for the more general (multilinear) iterated
Fréchet derivative. For this, we write `iteratedDeriv n f` as the composition of
`iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f` and a continuous linear equiv. As continuous linear equivs respect
differentiability and commute with differentiation, this makes it possible to prove readily that
the derivative of the `n`-th derivative is the `n+1`-th derivative in `iteratedDerivWithin_succ`,
by translating the corresponding result `iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left` for the
iterated Fréchet derivative.
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped Topology
open Filter Asymptotics Set
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F`, as a function from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDeriv (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative of a function from `𝕜` to `F` within a set `s`, as a function
from `𝕜` to `F`. -/
def iteratedDerivWithin (n : ℕ) (f : 𝕜 → F) (s : Set 𝕜) (x : 𝕜) : F :=
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1
variable {n : ℕ} {f : 𝕜 → F} {s : Set 𝕜} {x : 𝕜}
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_univ : iteratedDerivWithin n f univ = iteratedDeriv n f := by
ext x
rw [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedDeriv, iteratedFDerivWithin_univ]
/-! ### Properties of the iterated derivative within a set -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin : iteratedDerivWithin n f s x =
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1 :=
rfl
/-- Write the iterated derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the iterated
Fréchet derivative -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedDerivWithin n f s =
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F).symm ∘ iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s := by
ext x; rfl
/-- Write the iterated Fréchet derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the
iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp :
iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s =
ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F ∘ iteratedDerivWithin n f s := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, ← Function.comp_assoc, LinearIsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm,
Function.id_comp]
/-- The `n`-th Fréchet derivative applied to a vector `(m 0, ..., m (n-1))` is the derivative
multiplied by the product of the `m i`s. -/
theorem iteratedFDerivWithin_apply_eq_iteratedDerivWithin_mul_prod {m : Fin n → 𝕜} :
(iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) m =
(∏ i, m i) • iteratedDerivWithin n f s x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin, ← ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ]
simp
theorem norm_iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_norm_iteratedDerivWithin :
‖iteratedFDerivWithin 𝕜 n f s x‖ = ‖iteratedDerivWithin n f s x‖ := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_zero : iteratedDerivWithin 0 f s = f := by
ext x
simp [iteratedDerivWithin]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_one {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin 1 f s x = derivWithin f s x := by
by_cases hsx : AccPt x (𝓟 s)
· simp only [iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_one_apply hsx.uniqueDiffWithinAt,
derivWithin]
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hsx, iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hsx]
/-- If the first `n` derivatives within a set of a function are continuous, and its first `n-1`
derivatives are differentiable, then the function is `C^n`. This is not an equivalence in general,
but this is an equivalence when the set has unique derivatives, see
`contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv`. -/
theorem contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(Hcont : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s)
(Hdiff : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (fun x => iteratedDerivWithin m f s x) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_continuousOn_differentiableOn
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff]
· simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- To check that a function is `n` times continuously differentiable, it suffices to check that its
first `n` derivatives are differentiable. This is slightly too strong as the condition we
require on the `n`-th derivative is differentiability instead of continuity, but it has the
advantage of avoiding the discussion of continuity in the proof (and for `n = ∞` this is optimal).
-/
theorem contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s := by
apply contDiffOn_of_differentiableOn
simpa only [iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives up to `n` which are
continuous. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.continuousOn_iteratedDerivWithin
{n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ} (h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s)
(hmn : m ≤ n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) : ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff] using
h.continuousOn_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
theorem ContDiffWithinAt.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffWithinAt 𝕜 n f s x) (hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 (insert x s)) :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s x := by
simpa only [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff] using
h.differentiableWithinAt_iteratedFDerivWithin hmn hs
/-- On a set with unique derivatives, a `C^n` function has derivatives less than `n` which are
differentiable. -/
theorem ContDiffOn.differentiableOn_iteratedDerivWithin {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {m : ℕ}
(h : ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s) (hmn : m < n) (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := fun x hx =>
(h x hx).differentiableWithinAt_iteratedDerivWithin hmn <| by rwa [insert_eq_of_mem hx]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative on sets with unique derivatives. -/
theorem contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ∞} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ (∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
simp only [contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn hs, iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuousOn_iff, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiableOn_iff]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative on sets with unique derivatives. -/
theorem contDiffOn_nat_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv {n : ℕ} (hs : UniqueDiffOn 𝕜 s) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n f s ↔ (∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → ContinuousOn (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, m < n → DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin m f s) s := by
rw [show n = ((n : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞) from rfl,
contDiffOn_iff_continuousOn_differentiableOn_deriv hs]
simp
/-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
differentiating the `n`-th iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_succ {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x = derivWithin (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x := by
by_cases hxs : AccPt x (𝓟 s)
· rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iteratedFDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin_succ_apply_left,
iteratedFDerivWithin_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hxs.uniqueDiffWithinAt, derivWithin]
change ((ContinuousMultilinearMap.mkPiRing 𝕜 (Fin n) ((fderivWithin 𝕜
(iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x : 𝕜 → F) 1) : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1) =
(fderivWithin 𝕜 (iteratedDerivWithin n f s) s x : 𝕜 → F) 1
simp
· simp [derivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hxs, iteratedDerivWithin, iteratedFDerivWithin,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_accPt hxs]
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
iterating `n` times the differentiation operation. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin n f s x = (fun g : 𝕜 → F => derivWithin g s)^[n] f x := by
induction n generalizing x with
| zero => simp
| succ n IH =>
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_succ, Function.iterate_succ']
exact derivWithin_congr (fun y hy => IH) IH
/-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative within a set with unique derivatives can be obtained by
taking the `n`-th derivative of the derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDerivWithin_succ' {x : 𝕜} :
iteratedDerivWithin (n + 1) f s x = (iteratedDerivWithin n (derivWithin f s) s) x := by
rw [iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate, iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate]; rfl
/-! ### Properties of the iterated derivative on the whole space -/
theorem iteratedDeriv_eq_iteratedFDeriv :
iteratedDeriv n f x = (iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) fun _ : Fin n => 1 :=
rfl
/-- Write the iterated derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the iterated
Fréchet derivative -/
theorem iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedDeriv n f =
(ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F).symm ∘ iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f := by
ext x; rfl
/-- Write the iterated Fréchet derivative as the composition of a continuous linear equiv and the
iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_eq_equiv_comp : iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f =
ContinuousMultilinearMap.piFieldEquiv 𝕜 (Fin n) F ∘ iteratedDeriv n f := by
rw [iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp, ← Function.comp_assoc, LinearIsometryEquiv.self_comp_symm,
Function.id_comp]
/-- The `n`-th Fréchet derivative applied to a vector `(m 0, ..., m (n-1))` is the derivative
multiplied by the product of the `m i`s. -/
theorem iteratedFDeriv_apply_eq_iteratedDeriv_mul_prod {m : Fin n → 𝕜} :
(iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x : (Fin n → 𝕜) → F) m = (∏ i, m i) • iteratedDeriv n f x := by
rw [iteratedDeriv_eq_iteratedFDeriv, ← ContinuousMultilinearMap.map_smul_univ]; simp
theorem norm_iteratedFDeriv_eq_norm_iteratedDeriv :
‖iteratedFDeriv 𝕜 n f x‖ = ‖iteratedDeriv n f x‖ := by
rw [iteratedDeriv_eq_equiv_comp, Function.comp_apply, LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDeriv_zero : iteratedDeriv 0 f = f := by ext x; simp [iteratedDeriv]
@[simp]
theorem iteratedDeriv_one : iteratedDeriv 1 f = deriv f := by ext x; simp [iteratedDeriv]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative. -/
theorem contDiff_iff_iteratedDeriv {n : ℕ∞} : ContDiff 𝕜 n f ↔
(∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → Continuous (iteratedDeriv m f)) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) < n → Differentiable 𝕜 (iteratedDeriv m f) := by
simp only [contDiff_iff_continuous_differentiable, iteratedFDeriv_eq_equiv_comp,
LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_continuous_iff, LinearIsometryEquiv.comp_differentiable_iff]
/-- The property of being `C^n`, initially defined in terms of the Fréchet derivative, can be
reformulated in terms of the one-dimensional derivative. -/
theorem contDiff_nat_iff_iteratedDeriv {n : ℕ} : ContDiff 𝕜 n f ↔
(∀ m : ℕ, m ≤ n → Continuous (iteratedDeriv m f)) ∧
∀ m : ℕ, m < n → Differentiable 𝕜 (iteratedDeriv m f) := by
rw [show n = ((n : ℕ∞) : WithTop ℕ∞) from rfl, contDiff_iff_iteratedDeriv]
simp
/-- To check that a function is `n` times continuously differentiable, it suffices to check that its
first `n` derivatives are differentiable. This is slightly too strong as the condition we
require on the `n`-th derivative is differentiability instead of continuity, but it has the
advantage of avoiding the discussion of continuity in the proof (and for `n = ∞` this is optimal).
-/
theorem contDiff_of_differentiable_iteratedDeriv {n : ℕ∞}
(h : ∀ m : ℕ, (m : ℕ∞) ≤ n → Differentiable 𝕜 (iteratedDeriv m f)) : ContDiff 𝕜 n f :=
contDiff_iff_iteratedDeriv.2 ⟨fun m hm => (h m hm).continuous, fun m hm => h m (le_of_lt hm)⟩
theorem ContDiff.continuous_iteratedDeriv {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (m : ℕ) (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hmn : m ≤ n) : Continuous (iteratedDeriv m f) :=
(contDiff_iff_iteratedDeriv.1 (h.of_le hmn)).1 m le_rfl
theorem ContDiff.differentiable_iteratedDeriv {n : WithTop ℕ∞} (m : ℕ) (h : ContDiff 𝕜 n f)
(hmn : m < n) : Differentiable 𝕜 (iteratedDeriv m f) :=
(contDiff_iff_iteratedDeriv.1 (h.of_le (ENat.add_one_natCast_le_withTop_of_lt hmn))).2 m
(mod_cast (lt_add_one m))
/-- The `n+1`-th iterated derivative can be obtained by differentiating the `n`-th
iterated derivative. -/
theorem iteratedDeriv_succ : iteratedDeriv (n + 1) f = deriv (iteratedDeriv n f) := by
ext x
rw [← iteratedDerivWithin_univ, ← iteratedDerivWithin_univ, ← derivWithin_univ]
exact iteratedDerivWithin_succ
/-- The `n`-th iterated derivative can be obtained by iterating `n` times the
differentiation operation. -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/IteratedDeriv/Defs.lean | 285 | 288 | theorem iteratedDeriv_eq_iterate : iteratedDeriv n f = deriv^[n] f := by | ext x
rw [← iteratedDerivWithin_univ]
convert iteratedDerivWithin_eq_iterate (F := F) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Topology
import Mathlib.Analysis.NormedSpace.Pointwise
import Mathlib.Analysis.Seminorm
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.RCLike.Basic
/-!
# The Minkowski functional
This file defines the Minkowski functional, aka gauge.
The Minkowski functional of a set `s` is the function which associates each point to how much you
need to scale `s` for `x` to be inside it. When `s` is symmetric, convex and absorbent, its gauge is
a seminorm. Reciprocally, any seminorm arises as the gauge of some set, namely its unit ball. This
induces the equivalence of seminorms and locally convex topological vector spaces.
## Main declarations
For a real vector space,
* `gauge`: Aka Minkowski functional. `gauge s x` is the least (actually, an infimum) `r` such
that `x ∈ r • s`.
* `gaugeSeminorm`: The Minkowski functional as a seminorm, when `s` is symmetric, convex and
absorbent.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
Minkowski functional, gauge
-/
open NormedField Set
open scoped Pointwise Topology NNReal
noncomputable section
variable {𝕜 E : Type*}
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E] [Module ℝ E]
/-- The Minkowski functional. Given a set `s` in a real vector space, `gauge s` is the functional
which sends `x : E` to the smallest `r : ℝ` such that `x` is in `s` scaled by `r`. -/
def gauge (s : Set E) (x : E) : ℝ :=
sInf { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }
variable {s t : Set E} {x : E} {a : ℝ}
theorem gauge_def : gauge s x = sInf ({ r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | x ∈ r • s }) :=
rfl
/-- An alternative definition of the gauge using scalar multiplication on the element rather than on
the set. -/
theorem gauge_def' : gauge s x = sInf {r ∈ Set.Ioi (0 : ℝ) | r⁻¹ • x ∈ s} := by
congrm sInf {r | ?_}
exact and_congr_right fun hr => mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr.ne' _ _
private theorem gauge_set_bddBelow : BddBelow { r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s } :=
⟨0, fun _ hr => hr.1.le⟩
/-- If the given subset is `Absorbent` then the set we take an infimum over in `gauge` is nonempty,
which is useful for proving many properties about the gauge. -/
theorem Absorbent.gauge_set_nonempty (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ r : ℝ | 0 < r ∧ x ∈ r • s }.Nonempty :=
let ⟨r, hr₁, hr₂⟩ := (absorbs x).exists_pos
⟨r, hr₁, hr₂ r (Real.norm_of_nonneg hr₁.le).ge rfl⟩
theorem gauge_mono (hs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : s ⊆ t) : gauge t ≤ gauge s := fun _ =>
csInf_le_csInf gauge_set_bddBelow hs.gauge_set_nonempty fun _ hr => ⟨hr.1, smul_set_mono h hr.2⟩
theorem exists_lt_of_gauge_lt (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (h : gauge s x < a) :
∃ b, 0 < b ∧ b < a ∧ x ∈ b • s := by
obtain ⟨b, ⟨hb, hx⟩, hba⟩ := exists_lt_of_csInf_lt absorbs.gauge_set_nonempty h
exact ⟨b, hb, hba, hx⟩
/-- The gauge evaluated at `0` is always zero (mathematically this requires `0` to be in the set `s`
but, the real infimum of the empty set in Lean being defined as `0`, it holds unconditionally). -/
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero : gauge s 0 = 0 := by
rw [gauge_def']
by_cases h : (0 : E) ∈ s
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_true, h, csInf_Ioi]
· simp only [smul_zero, sep_false, h, Real.sInf_empty]
@[simp]
theorem gauge_zero' : gauge (0 : Set E) = 0 := by
ext x
rw [gauge_def']
obtain rfl | hx := eq_or_ne x 0
· simp only [csInf_Ioi, mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, eq_self_iff_true, sep_true, smul_zero]
· simp only [mem_zero, Pi.zero_apply, inv_eq_zero, smul_eq_zero]
convert Real.sInf_empty
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun r hr => hr.2.elim (ne_of_gt hr.1) hx
@[simp]
theorem gauge_empty : gauge (∅ : Set E) = 0 := by
ext
simp only [gauge_def', Real.sInf_empty, mem_empty_iff_false, Pi.zero_apply, sep_false]
theorem gauge_of_subset_zero (h : s ⊆ 0) : gauge s = 0 := by
obtain rfl | rfl := subset_singleton_iff_eq.1 h
exacts [gauge_empty, gauge_zero']
/-- The gauge is always nonnegative. -/
theorem gauge_nonneg (x : E) : 0 ≤ gauge s x :=
Real.sInf_nonneg fun _ hx => hx.1.le
theorem gauge_neg (symmetric : ∀ x ∈ s, -x ∈ s) (x : E) : gauge s (-x) = gauge s x := by
have : ∀ x, -x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ s := fun x => ⟨fun h => by simpa using symmetric _ h, symmetric x⟩
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, this]
theorem gauge_neg_set_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) (-x) = gauge s x := by
simp_rw [gauge_def', smul_neg, neg_mem_neg]
theorem gauge_neg_set_eq_gauge_neg (x : E) : gauge (-s) x = gauge s (-x) := by
rw [← gauge_neg_set_neg, neg_neg]
theorem gauge_le_of_mem (ha : 0 ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ a • s) : gauge s x ≤ a := by
obtain rfl | ha' := ha.eq_or_lt
· rw [mem_singleton_iff.1 (zero_smul_set_subset _ hx), gauge_zero]
· exact csInf_le gauge_set_bddBelow ⟨ha', hx⟩
theorem gauge_le_eq (hs₁ : Convex ℝ s) (hs₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (hs₂ : Absorbent ℝ s) (ha : 0 ≤ a) :
{ x | gauge s x ≤ a } = ⋂ (r : ℝ) (_ : a < r), r • s := by
ext x
simp_rw [Set.mem_iInter, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine ⟨fun h r hr => ?_, fun h => le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_⟩
· have hr' := ha.trans_lt hr
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ hr'.ne']
obtain ⟨δ, δ_pos, hδr, hδ⟩ := exists_lt_of_gauge_lt hs₂ (h.trans_lt hr)
suffices (r⁻¹ * δ) • δ⁻¹ • x ∈ s by rwa [smul_smul, mul_inv_cancel_right₀ δ_pos.ne'] at this
rw [mem_smul_set_iff_inv_smul_mem₀ δ_pos.ne'] at hδ
refine hs₁.smul_mem_of_zero_mem hs₀ hδ ⟨by positivity, ?_⟩
rw [inv_mul_le_iff₀ hr', mul_one]
exact hδr.le
· have hε' := (lt_add_iff_pos_right a).2 (half_pos hε)
exact
(gauge_le_of_mem (ha.trans hε'.le) <| h _ hε').trans_lt (add_lt_add_left (half_lt_self hε) _)
theorem gauge_lt_eq' (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ (r : ℝ) (_ : 0 < r) (_ : r < a), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem gauge_lt_eq (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (a : ℝ) :
{ x | gauge s x < a } = ⋃ r ∈ Set.Ioo 0 (a : ℝ), r • s := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_iUnion, exists_prop, mem_Ioo, and_assoc]
exact
⟨exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs, fun ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, hx⟩ =>
(gauge_le_of_mem hr₀.le hx).trans_lt hr₁⟩
theorem mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (hgauge : gauge s x < 1) :
∃ y ∈ s, x ∈ openSegment ℝ 0 y := by
rcases exists_lt_of_gauge_lt absorbs hgauge with ⟨r, hr₀, hr₁, y, hy, rfl⟩
refine ⟨y, hy, 1 - r, r, ?_⟩
simp [*]
theorem gauge_lt_one_subset_self (hs : Convex ℝ s) (h₀ : (0 : E) ∈ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) :
{ x | gauge s x < 1 } ⊆ s := fun _x hx ↦
let ⟨_y, hys, hx⟩ := mem_openSegment_of_gauge_lt_one absorbs hx
hs.openSegment_subset h₀ hys hx
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Gauge.lean | 175 | 181 | theorem gauge_le_one_of_mem {x : E} (hx : x ∈ s) : gauge s x ≤ 1 :=
gauge_le_of_mem zero_le_one <| by rwa [one_smul]
/-- Gauge is subadditive. -/
theorem gauge_add_le (hs : Convex ℝ s) (absorbs : Absorbent ℝ s) (x y : E) :
gauge s (x + y) ≤ gauge s x + gauge s y := by | refine le_of_forall_pos_lt_add fun ε hε => ?_ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Covering.VitaliFamily
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.AEMeasurableOrder
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Average
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Decomposition.Lebesgue
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Regular
/-!
# Differentiation of measures
On a second countable metric space with a measure `μ`, consider a Vitali family (i.e., for each `x`
one has a family of sets shrinking to `x`, with a good behavior with respect to covering theorems).
Consider also another measure `ρ`. Then, for almost every `x`, the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges when
`a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with
respect to `μ`. This is the main theorem on differentiation of measures.
This theorem is proved in this file, under the name `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`. Note that,
almost surely, `μ a` is eventually positive and finite (see
`VitaliFamily.ae_eventually_measure_pos` and `VitaliFamily.eventually_measure_lt_top`), so the
ratio really makes sense.
For concrete applications, one needs concrete instances of Vitali families, as provided for instance
by `Besicovitch.vitaliFamily` (for balls) or by `Vitali.vitaliFamily` (for doubling measures).
Specific applications to Lebesgue density points and the Lebesgue differentiation theorem are also
derived:
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div` states that, for almost every point `x ∈ s`,
then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` tends to `1` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
* `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub` states that, for almost every point `x`, then the
average of `y ↦ ‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family.
## Sketch of proof
Let `v` be a Vitali family for `μ`. Assume for simplicity that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with
respect to `μ`, as the case of a singular measure is easier.
It is easy to see that a set `s` on which `liminf ρ a / μ a < q` satisfies `ρ s ≤ q * μ s`, by using
a disjoint subcovering provided by the definition of Vitali families. Similarly for the limsup.
It follows that a set on which `ρ a / μ a` oscillates has measure `0`, and therefore that
`ρ a / μ a` converges almost surely (`VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_div`). Moreover, on a set where the
limit is close to a constant `c`, one gets `ρ s ∼ c μ s`, using again a covering lemma as above.
It follows that `ρ` is equal to `μ.withDensity (v.limRatio ρ x)`, where `v.limRatio ρ x` is the
limit of `ρ a / μ a` at `x` (which is well defined almost everywhere). By uniqueness of the
Radon-Nikodym derivative, one gets `v.limRatio ρ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x` almost everywhere, completing
the proof.
There is a difficulty in this sketch: this argument works well when `v.limRatio ρ` is measurable,
but there is no guarantee that this is the case, especially if one doesn't make further assumptions
on the Vitali family. We use an indirect argument to show that `v.limRatio ρ` is always
almost everywhere measurable, again based on the disjoint subcovering argument
(see `VitaliFamily.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio`), and then proceed as sketched above
but replacing `v.limRatio ρ` by a measurable version called `v.limRatioMeas ρ`.
## Counterexample
The standing assumption in this file is that spaces are second countable. Without this assumption,
measures may be zero locally but nonzero globally, which is not compatible with differentiation
theory (which deduces global information from local one). Here is an example displaying this
behavior.
Define a measure `μ` by `μ s = 0` if `s` is covered by countably many balls of radius `1`,
and `μ s = ∞` otherwise. This is indeed a countably additive measure, which is moreover
locally finite and doubling at small scales. It vanishes on every ball of radius `1`, so all the
quantities in differentiation theory (defined as ratios of measures as the radius tends to zero)
make no sense. However, the measure is not globally zero if the space is big enough.
## References
* [Herbert Federer, Geometric Measure Theory, Chapter 2.9][Federer1996]
-/
open MeasureTheory Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure
open scoped Filter ENNReal MeasureTheory NNReal Topology
variable {α : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
(v : VitaliFamily μ)
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
namespace VitaliFamily
/-- The limit along a Vitali family of `ρ a / μ a` where it makes sense, and garbage otherwise.
Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary device to show that this ratio tends almost
everywhere to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatio (ρ : Measure α) (x : α) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
limUnder (v.filterAt x) fun a => ρ a / μ a
/-- For almost every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have positive
measure. (This is a nontrivial result, following from the covering property of Vitali families). -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_pos [SecondCountableTopology α] :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a := by
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, 0 < μ a} with hs
simp -zeta only [not_lt, not_eventually, nonpos_iff_eq_zero] at hs
change μ s = 0
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | μ a = 0}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
intro x hx ε εpos
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [frequently_filterAt_iff, exists_prop, gt_iff_lt, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
rcases hx ε εpos with ⟨a, a_sets, ax, μa⟩
exact ⟨a, ⟨a_sets, μa⟩, ax⟩
refine le_antisymm ?_ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, μ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum
_ = ∑' x : h.index, 0 := by congr; ext1 x; exact h.covering_mem x.2
_ = 0 := by simp only [tsum_zero, add_zero]
/-- For every point `x`, sufficiently small sets in a Vitali family around `x` have finite measure.
(This is a trivial result, following from the fact that the measure is locally finite). -/
theorem eventually_measure_lt_top [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] (x : α) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, μ a < ∞ :=
(μ.finiteAt_nhds x).eventually.filter_mono inf_le_left
/-- If two measures `ρ` and `ν` have, at every point of a set `s`, arbitrarily small sets in a
Vitali family satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`, then `ρ s ≤ ν s` if `ρ ≪ μ`. -/
theorem measure_le_of_frequently_le [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] {ρ : Measure α}
(ν : Measure α) [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ν] (hρ : ρ ≪ μ) (s : Set α)
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ ν a) : ρ s ≤ ν s := by
-- this follows from a covering argument using the sets satisfying `ρ a ≤ ν a`.
apply ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos _ => ?_
obtain ⟨U, sU, U_open, νU⟩ : ∃ (U : Set α), s ⊆ U ∧ IsOpen U ∧ ν U ≤ ν s + ε :=
exists_isOpen_le_add s ν (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne'
let f : α → Set (Set α) := fun _ => {a | ρ a ≤ ν a ∧ a ⊆ U}
have h : v.FineSubfamilyOn f s := by
apply v.fineSubfamilyOn_of_frequently f s fun x hx => ?_
have :=
(hs x hx).and_eventually
((v.eventually_filterAt_mem_setsAt x).and
(v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (U_open.mem_nhds (sU hx))))
apply Frequently.mono this
rintro a ⟨ρa, _, aU⟩
exact ⟨ρa, aU⟩
haveI : Encodable h.index := h.index_countable.toEncodable
calc
ρ s ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ρ (h.covering x) := h.measure_le_tsum_of_absolutelyContinuous hρ
_ ≤ ∑' x : h.index, ν (h.covering x) := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun x => (h.covering_mem x.2).1
_ = ν (⋃ x : h.index, h.covering x) := by
rw [measure_iUnion h.covering_disjoint_subtype fun i => h.measurableSet_u i.2]
_ ≤ ν U := (measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun i => (h.covering_mem i.2).2))
_ ≤ ν s + ε := νU
theorem eventually_filterAt_integrableOn (x : α) {f : α → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, IntegrableOn f a μ := by
rcases hf x with ⟨w, w_nhds, hw⟩
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds w_nhds] with a ha
exact hw.mono_set ha
section
variable [SecondCountableTopology α] [BorelSpace α] [IsLocallyFiniteMeasure μ] {ρ : Measure α}
[IsLocallyFiniteMeasure ρ]
/-- If a measure `ρ` is singular with respect to `μ`, then for `μ` almost every `x`, the ratio
`ρ a / μ a` tends to zero when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family. This makes sense
as `μ a` is eventually positive by `ae_eventually_measure_pos`. -/
theorem ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (hρ : ρ ⟂ₘ μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
have A : ∀ ε > (0 : ℝ≥0), ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a := by
intro ε εpos
set s := {x | ¬∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < ε * μ a} with hs
change μ s = 0
obtain ⟨o, _, ρo, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, MeasurableSet o ∧ ρ o = 0 ∧ μ oᶜ = 0 := hρ
apply le_antisymm _ bot_le
calc
μ s ≤ μ (s ∩ o ∪ oᶜ) := by
conv_lhs => rw [← inter_union_compl s o]
gcongr
apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ μ (s ∩ o) + μ oᶜ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (s ∩ o) := by rw [μo, add_zero]
_ = (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * (ε • μ) (s ∩ o) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply, ← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)]
rw [ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 εpos).ne' ENNReal.coe_ne_top, one_mul]
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ (s ∩ o) := by
gcongr
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous _ ?_
intro x hx
rw [hs] at hx
simp only [mem_inter_iff, not_lt, not_eventually, mem_setOf_eq] at hx
exact hx.1
_ ≤ (ε : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ o := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = 0 := by rw [ρo, mul_zero]
obtain ⟨u, _, u_pos, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ≥0, StrictAnti u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, 0 < u n) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 0) :=
exists_seq_strictAnti_tendsto (0 : ℝ≥0)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a < u n * μ a :=
ae_all_iff.2 fun n => A (u n) (u_pos n)
filter_upwards [B, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos]
intro x hx h'x
refine tendsto_order.2 ⟨fun z hz => (ENNReal.not_lt_zero hz).elim, fun z hz => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨w, w_pos, w_lt⟩ : ∃ w : ℝ≥0, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < w ∧ (w : ℝ≥0∞) < z :=
ENNReal.lt_iff_exists_nnreal_btwn.1 hz
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, u n < w := ((tendsto_order.1 u_lim).2 w (ENNReal.coe_pos.1 w_pos)).exists
filter_upwards [hx n, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x]
intro a ha μa_pos μa_lt_top
rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl μa_pos.ne') (Or.inl μa_lt_top.ne)]
exact ha.trans_le (mul_le_mul_right' ((ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 hn.le).trans w_lt.le) _)
section AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (hρ : ρ ≪ μ)
include hρ
/-- A set of points `s` satisfying both `ρ a ≤ c * μ a` and `ρ a ≥ d * μ a` at arbitrarily small
sets in a Vitali family has measure `0` if `c < d`. Indeed, the first inequality should imply
that `ρ s ≤ c * μ s`, and the second one that `ρ s ≥ d * μ s`, a contradiction if `0 < μ s`. -/
theorem null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge {c d : ℝ≥0} (hcd : c < d) (s : Set α)
(hc : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a ≤ c * μ a)
(hd : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (d : ℝ≥0∞) * μ a ≤ ρ a) : μ s = 0 := by
apply measure_null_of_locally_null s fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
refine ⟨s ∩ o, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), ?_⟩
let s' := s ∩ o
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ s')
calc
ρ s' ≤ c * μ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (c • μ) hρ s' fun x hx => hc x hx.1
_ < d * μ s' := by
apply (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_right h _).2 (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.2 hcd)
exact (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_right) μo).ne
_ ≤ ρ s' := v.measure_le_of_frequently_le ρ smul_absolutelyContinuous s' fun x hx ↦ hd x hx.1
/-- If `ρ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`, then for almost every `x`,
the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family for `μ`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_div : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c) := by
obtain ⟨w, w_count, w_dense, _, w_top⟩ :
∃ w : Set ℝ≥0∞, w.Countable ∧ Dense w ∧ 0 ∉ w ∧ ∞ ∉ w :=
ENNReal.exists_countable_dense_no_zero_top
have I : ∀ x ∈ w, x ≠ ∞ := fun x xs hx => w_top (hx ▸ xs)
have A : ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d → ∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
intro c hc d hd hcd
lift c to ℝ≥0 using I c hc
lift d to ℝ≥0 using I d hd
apply v.null_of_frequently_le_of_frequently_ge hρ (ENNReal.coe_lt_coe.1 hcd)
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x h1x _
apply h1x.mono fun a ha => ?_
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
· simp only [and_imp, exists_prop, not_frequently, not_and, not_lt, not_le, not_eventually,
mem_setOf_eq, mem_compl_iff, not_forall]
intro x _ h2x
apply h2x.mono fun a ha => ?_
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ c ∈ w, ∀ d ∈ w, c < d →
¬((∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, ρ a / μ a < c) ∧ ∃ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, d < ρ a / μ a) := by
#adaptation_note /-- 2024-04-23
The next two lines were previously just `simpa only [ae_ball_iff w_count, ae_all_iff]` -/
rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; intro x hx; rw [ae_ball_iff w_count]; revert x
simpa only [ae_all_iff]
filter_upwards [B]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_of_no_upcrossings w_dense hx
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatio :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_div hρ]
intro x hx
exact tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx
/-- Given two thresholds `p < q`, the sets `{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}`
and `{x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}` are obviously disjoint. The key to proving that `v.limRatio ρ` is
almost everywhere measurable is to show that these sets have measurable supersets which are also
disjoint, up to zero measure. This is the content of this lemma. -/
theorem exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio {p q : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p < q) :
∃ a b, MeasurableSet a ∧ MeasurableSet b ∧
{x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ⊆ a ∧ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ⊆ b ∧ μ (a ∩ b) = 0 := by
/- Here is a rough sketch, assuming that the measure is finite and the limit is well defined
everywhere. Let `u := {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p}` and `w := {x | q < v.limRatio ρ x}`. They
have measurable supersets `u'` and `w'` of the same measure. We will show that these satisfy
the conclusion of the theorem, i.e., `μ (u' ∩ w') = 0`. For this, note that
`ρ (u' ∩ w') = ρ (u ∩ w')` (as `w'` is measurable, see `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left`).
The latter set is included in the set where the limit of the ratios is `< p`, and therefore
its measure is `≤ p * μ (u ∩ w')`. Using the same trick in the other direction gives that this
is `p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. We have shown that `ρ (u' ∩ w') ≤ p * μ (u' ∩ w')`. Arguing in the same
way but using the `w` part gives `q * μ (u' ∩ w') ≤ ρ (u' ∩ w')`. If `μ (u' ∩ w')` were nonzero,
this would be a contradiction as `p < q`.
For the rigorous proof, we need to work on a part of the space where the measure is finite
(provided by `spanningSets (ρ + μ)`) and to restrict to the set where the limit is well defined
(called `s` below, of full measure). Otherwise, the argument goes through.
-/
let s := {x | ∃ c, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 c)}
let o : ℕ → Set α := spanningSets (ρ + μ)
let u n := s ∩ {x | v.limRatio ρ x < p} ∩ o n
let w n := s ∩ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatio ρ x} ∩ o n
-- the supersets are obtained by restricting to the set `s` where the limit is well defined, to
-- a finite measure part `o n`, taking a measurable superset here, and then taking the union over
-- `n`.
refine
⟨toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n),
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n), ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩
-- check that these sets are measurable supersets as required
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· exact
(measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).union
(MeasurableSet.iUnion fun n => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
· intro x hx
by_cases h : x ∈ s
· refine Or.inr (mem_iUnion.2 ⟨spanningSetsIndex (ρ + μ) x, ?_⟩)
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ ⟨⟨h, hx⟩, mem_spanningSetsIndex _ _⟩
· exact Or.inl (subset_toMeasurable μ sᶜ h)
-- it remains to check the nontrivial part that these sets have zero measure intersection.
-- it suffices to do it for fixed `m` and `n`, as one is taking countable unions.
suffices H : ∀ m n : ℕ, μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) = 0 by
have A :
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u n)) ∩
(toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪ ⋃ n, toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ⊆
toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n) := by
simp only [inter_union_distrib_left, union_inter_distrib_right, true_and,
subset_union_left, union_subset_iff, inter_self]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_⟩
· exact inter_subset_right.trans subset_union_left
· exact inter_subset_left.trans subset_union_left
· simp_rw [iUnion_inter, inter_iUnion]; exact subset_union_right
refine le_antisymm ((measure_mono A).trans ?_) bot_le
calc
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ ∪
⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
μ (toMeasurable μ sᶜ) +
μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ (⋃ (m) (n), toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
have : μ sᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_div hρ; rw [measure_toMeasurable, this, zero_add]
_ ≤ ∑' (m) (n), μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
((measure_iUnion_le _).trans (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun m => measure_iUnion_le _))
_ = 0 := by simp only [H, tsum_zero]
-- now starts the nontrivial part of the argument. We fix `m` and `n`, and show that the
-- measurable supersets of `u m` and `w n` have zero measure intersection by using the lemmas
-- `measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left` (to reduce to `u m` or `w n` instead of the measurable
-- superset) and `measure_le_of_frequently_le` to compare their measures for `ρ` and `μ`.
intro m n
have I : (ρ + μ) (u m) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have J : (ρ + μ) (w n) ≠ ∞ := by
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) n)).ne
exact inter_subset_right
have A :
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
ρ (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I
_ ≤ (p • μ) (u m ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (p • μ) hρ _ fun x hx => ?_
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.1.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, ρ b / μ b < p := (tendsto_order.1 L).2 _ hx.1.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
_ = p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
simp only [coe_nnreal_smul_apply,
measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) I]
have B :
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
calc
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) =
(q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm, measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J]
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ w n) := by
rw [← coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le _ (.smul_left .rfl _) _ ?_
intro x hx
have L : Tendsto (fun a : Set α => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatio ρ x)) :=
tendsto_nhds_limUnder hx.2.1.1
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, (q : ℝ≥0∞) < ρ b / μ b :=
(tendsto_order.1 L).1 _ hx.2.1.2
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
_ = ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
conv_rhs => rw [inter_comm]
rw [inter_comm]
exact (measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) J).symm
by_contra h
apply lt_irrefl (ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)))
calc
ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≤
p * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) :=
A
_ < q * μ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := by
gcongr
suffices H : (ρ + μ) (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) ≠ ∞ by
simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at H
exact H.2
apply (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono inter_subset_left) _).ne
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
apply lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono _) (measure_spanningSets_lt_top (ρ + μ) m)
exact inter_subset_right
_ ≤ ρ (toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (u m) ∩ toMeasurable (ρ + μ) (w n)) := B
theorem aemeasurable_limRatio : AEMeasurable (v.limRatio ρ) μ := by
apply ENNReal.aemeasurable_of_exist_almost_disjoint_supersets _ _ fun p q hpq => ?_
exact v.exists_measurable_supersets_limRatio hρ hpq
/-- A measurable version of `v.limRatio ρ`. Do *not* use this definition: it is only a temporary
device to show that `v.limRatio` is almost everywhere equal to the Radon-Nikodym derivative. -/
noncomputable def limRatioMeas : α → ℝ≥0∞ :=
(v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ).mk _
theorem limRatioMeas_measurable : Measurable (v.limRatioMeas hρ) :=
AEMeasurable.measurable_mk _
theorem ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x)) := by
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_limRatio hρ, AEMeasurable.ae_eq_mk (v.aemeasurable_limRatio hρ)]
intro x hx h'x
rwa [h'x] at hx
/-- If, for all `x` in a set `s`, one has frequently `ρ a / μ a < p`, then `ρ s ≤ p * μ s`, as
proved in `measure_le_of_frequently_le`. Since `ρ a / μ a` tends almost everywhere to
`v.limRatioMeas hρ x`, the same property holds for sets `s` on which `v.limRatioMeas hρ < p`. -/
theorem measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt {p : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α}
(h : s ⊆ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x < p}) : ρ s ≤ p * μ s := by
let t := {x : α | Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x))}
have A : μ tᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ
suffices H : ρ (s ∩ t) ≤ (p • μ) (s ∩ t) by calc
ρ s = ρ (s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ) := by rw [inter_union_compl]
_ ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) + ρ (s ∩ tᶜ) := measure_union_le _ _
_ ≤ (p • μ) (s ∩ t) + ρ tᶜ := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ ≤ p * μ (s ∩ t) := by simp [(hρ A)]
_ ≤ p * μ s := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le (p • μ) hρ _ fun x hx => ?_
have I : ∀ᶠ b : Set α in v.filterAt x, ρ b / μ b < p := (tendsto_order.1 hx.2).2 _ (h hx.1)
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
refine (ENNReal.div_le_iff_le_mul ?_ (Or.inr (bot_le.trans_lt ha).ne')).1 ha.le
simp only [ENNReal.coe_ne_top, Ne, or_true, not_false_iff]
/-- If, for all `x` in a set `s`, one has frequently `q < ρ a / μ a`, then `q * μ s ≤ ρ s`, as
proved in `measure_le_of_frequently_le`. Since `ρ a / μ a` tends almost everywhere to
`v.limRatioMeas hρ x`, the same property holds for sets `s` on which `q < v.limRatioMeas hρ`. -/
theorem mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas {q : ℝ≥0} {s : Set α}
(h : s ⊆ {x | (q : ℝ≥0∞) < v.limRatioMeas hρ x}) : (q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s ≤ ρ s := by
let t := {x : α | Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (v.limRatioMeas hρ x))}
have A : μ tᶜ = 0 := v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ
suffices H : (q • μ) (s ∩ t) ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) by calc
(q • μ) s = (q • μ) (s ∩ t ∪ s ∩ tᶜ) := by rw [inter_union_compl]
_ ≤ (q • μ) (s ∩ t) + (q • μ) (s ∩ tᶜ) := measure_union_le _ _
_ ≤ ρ (s ∩ t) + (q • μ) tᶜ := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
_ = ρ (s ∩ t) := by simp [A]
_ ≤ ρ s := by gcongr; apply inter_subset_left
refine v.measure_le_of_frequently_le _ (.smul_left .rfl _) _ ?_
intro x hx
have I : ∀ᶠ a in v.filterAt x, (q : ℝ≥0∞) < ρ a / μ a := (tendsto_order.1 hx.2).1 _ (h hx.1)
apply I.frequently.mono fun a ha => ?_
rw [coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
exact ENNReal.mul_le_of_le_div ha.le
/-- The points with `v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞` have measure `0` for `μ`. -/
theorem measure_limRatioMeas_top : μ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞} = 0 := by
refine measure_null_of_locally_null _ fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ ρ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top ρ x
let s := {x : α | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = ∞} ∩ o
refine ⟨s, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), le_antisymm ?_ bot_le⟩
have ρs : ρ s ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt μo).ne
have A : ∀ q : ℝ≥0, 1 ≤ q → μ s ≤ (q : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ s := by
intro q hq
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le _ (Or.inr ρs), mul_comm]
· apply v.mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas hρ
intro y hy
have : v.limRatioMeas hρ y = ∞ := hy.1
simp only [this, ENNReal.coe_lt_top, mem_setOf_eq]
· simp only [(zero_lt_one.trans_le hq).ne', true_or, ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne,
not_false_iff]
have B : Tendsto (fun q : ℝ≥0 => (q : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ * ρ s) atTop (𝓝 (∞⁻¹ * ρ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr ρs)
exact ENNReal.tendsto_inv_iff.2 (ENNReal.tendsto_coe_nhds_top.2 tendsto_id)
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.inv_top] at B
apply ge_of_tendsto B
exact eventually_atTop.2 ⟨1, A⟩
/-- The points with `v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0` have measure `0` for `ρ`. -/
theorem measure_limRatioMeas_zero : ρ {x | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0} = 0 := by
refine measure_null_of_locally_null _ fun x _ => ?_
obtain ⟨o, xo, o_open, μo⟩ : ∃ o : Set α, x ∈ o ∧ IsOpen o ∧ μ o < ∞ :=
Measure.exists_isOpen_measure_lt_top μ x
let s := {x : α | v.limRatioMeas hρ x = 0} ∩ o
refine ⟨s, inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (o_open.mem_nhds xo), le_antisymm ?_ bot_le⟩
have μs : μ s ≠ ∞ := ((measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans_lt μo).ne
have A : ∀ q : ℝ≥0, 0 < q → ρ s ≤ q * μ s := by
intro q hq
apply v.measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt hρ
intro y hy
have : v.limRatioMeas hρ y = 0 := hy.1
simp only [this, mem_setOf_eq, hq, ENNReal.coe_pos]
have B : Tendsto (fun q : ℝ≥0 => (q : ℝ≥0∞) * μ s) (𝓝[>] (0 : ℝ≥0)) (𝓝 ((0 : ℝ≥0) * μ s)) := by
apply ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const _ (Or.inr μs)
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_coe]
exact nhdsWithin_le_nhds
simp only [zero_mul, ENNReal.coe_zero] at B
apply ge_of_tendsto B
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] using A
/-- As an intermediate step to show that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ`, we show here
that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) ≤ t^2 ρ` for any `t > 1`. -/
theorem withDensity_le_mul {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : ℝ≥0} (ht : 1 < t) :
μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s := by
/- We cut `s` into the sets where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = 0`, where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = ∞`, and
where `v.limRatioMeas hρ ∈ [t^n, t^(n+1))` for `n : ℤ`. The first and second have measure `0`.
For the latter, since `v.limRatioMeas hρ` fluctuates by at most `t` on this slice, we can use
`measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt` and `mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas` to
show that the two measures are comparable up to `t` (in fact `t^2` for technical reasons of
strict inequalities). -/
have t_ne_zero' : t ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne'
have t_ne_zero : (t : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using t_ne_zero'
let ν := μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)
let f := v.limRatioMeas hρ
have f_meas : Measurable f := v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ
-- Note(kmill): smul elaborator when used for CoeFun fails to get CoeFun instance to trigger
-- unless you use the `(... :)` notation. Another fix is using `(2 : Nat)`, so this appears
-- to be an unpleasant interaction with default instances.
have A : ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) ≤ ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := by
apply le_trans _ (zero_le _)
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := hs.inter (f_meas (measurableSet_singleton _))
simp only [f, ν, nonpos_iff_eq_zero, M, withDensity_apply, lintegral_eq_zero_iff f_meas]
apply (ae_restrict_iff' M).2
exact Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => hx.2
have B : ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) ≤ ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) := by
apply le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _)
apply withDensity_absolutelyContinuous μ _
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans (v.measure_limRatioMeas_top hρ).le
have C :
∀ n : ℤ,
ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) ≤
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) := by
intro n
let I := Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := hs.inter (f_meas measurableSet_Ico)
simp only [ν, I, M, withDensity_apply, coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
calc
(∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, f x ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ _ in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' M).2 (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => hx.2.2.le))
_ = (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
_ = (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (2 : ℤ) * ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n - 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I)) := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← ENNReal.zpow_add t_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
congr 2
abel
_ ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (2 : ℤ) * ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
gcongr
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne']
apply v.mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas hρ
intro x hx
apply lt_of_lt_of_le _ hx.2.1
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne', ENNReal.coe_lt_coe, sub_eq_add_neg,
zpow_add₀ t_ne_zero']
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one (t ^ n)]
gcongr
rw [zpow_neg_one]
exact inv_lt_one_of_one_lt₀ ht
calc
ν s =
ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ν (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ν f_meas hs ht
_ ≤
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico (t ^ n) (t ^ (n + 1))) :=
(add_le_add (add_le_add A B) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum C))
_ = ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ :) s :=
(measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 • ρ) f_meas hs ht).symm
/-- As an intermediate step to show that `μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ`, we show here
that `ρ ≤ t μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)` for any `t > 1`. -/
theorem le_mul_withDensity {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : ℝ≥0} (ht : 1 < t) :
ρ s ≤ t * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s := by
/- We cut `s` into the sets where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = 0`, where `v.limRatioMeas hρ = ∞`, and
where `v.limRatioMeas hρ ∈ [t^n, t^(n+1))` for `n : ℤ`. The first and second have measure `0`.
For the latter, since `v.limRatioMeas hρ` fluctuates by at most `t` on this slice, we can use
`measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt` and `mul_measure_le_of_subset_lt_limRatioMeas` to
show that the two measures are comparable up to `t`. -/
have t_ne_zero' : t ≠ 0 := (zero_lt_one.trans ht).ne'
have t_ne_zero : (t : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by simpa only [ENNReal.coe_eq_zero, Ne] using t_ne_zero'
let ν := μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)
let f := v.limRatioMeas hρ
have f_meas : Measurable f := v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ
have A : ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) ≤ (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) := by
refine le_trans (measure_mono inter_subset_right) (le_trans (le_of_eq ?_) (zero_le _))
exact v.measure_limRatioMeas_zero hρ
have B : ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) ≤ (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) := by
apply le_trans (le_of_eq _) (zero_le _)
apply hρ
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
exact (measure_mono inter_subset_right).trans (v.measure_limRatioMeas_top hρ).le
have C :
∀ n : ℤ,
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) ≤
(t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) := by
intro n
let I := Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))
have M : MeasurableSet (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := hs.inter (f_meas measurableSet_Ico)
simp only [ν, I, M, withDensity_apply, coe_nnreal_smul_apply]
calc
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) ≤ (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) * μ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' I) := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zpow t_ne_zero']
apply v.measure_le_mul_of_subset_limRatioMeas_lt hρ
intro x hx
apply hx.2.2.trans_le (le_of_eq _)
rw [ENNReal.coe_zpow t_ne_zero']
_ = ∫⁻ _ in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, (t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1) ∂μ := by
simp only [lintegral_const, MeasurableSet.univ, Measure.restrict_apply, univ_inter]
_ ≤ ∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, t * f x ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_mono_ae ((ae_restrict_iff' M).2 (Eventually.of_forall fun x hx => ?_))
rw [add_comm, ENNReal.zpow_add t_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, zpow_one]
exact mul_le_mul_left' hx.2.1 _
_ = t * ∫⁻ x in s ∩ f ⁻¹' I, f x ∂μ := lintegral_const_mul _ f_meas
calc
ρ s =
ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, ρ (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow ρ f_meas hs ht
_ ≤
(t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {0}) + (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' {∞}) +
∑' n : ℤ, (t • ν) (s ∩ f ⁻¹' Ico ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ n) ((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (n + 1))) :=
(add_le_add (add_le_add A B) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum C))
_ = (t • ν) s :=
(measure_eq_measure_preimage_add_measure_tsum_Ico_zpow (t • ν) f_meas hs ht).symm
theorem withDensity_limRatioMeas_eq : μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) = ρ := by
ext1 s hs
refine le_antisymm ?_ ?_
· have : Tendsto (fun t : ℝ≥0 =>
((t : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s : ℝ≥0∞)) (𝓝[>] 1) (𝓝 ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ 2 * ρ s)) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul ?_ ?_ tendsto_const_nhds ?_
· exact ENNReal.Tendsto.pow (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
· simp only [one_pow, ENNReal.coe_one, true_or, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero]
· simp only [one_pow, ENNReal.coe_one, Ne, or_true, ENNReal.one_ne_top, not_false_iff]
simp only [one_pow, one_mul, ENNReal.coe_one] at this
refine ge_of_tendsto this ?_
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with _ ht
exact v.withDensity_le_mul hρ hs ht
· have :
Tendsto (fun t : ℝ≥0 => (t : ℝ≥0∞) * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s) (𝓝[>] 1)
(𝓝 ((1 : ℝ≥0∞) * μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ) s)) := by
refine ENNReal.Tendsto.mul_const (ENNReal.tendsto_coe.2 nhdsWithin_le_nhds) ?_
simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, true_or, Ne, not_false_iff, one_ne_zero]
simp only [one_mul, ENNReal.coe_one] at this
refine ge_of_tendsto this ?_
filter_upwards [self_mem_nhdsWithin] with _ ht
exact v.le_mul_withDensity hρ hs ht
/-- Weak version of the main theorem on differentiation of measures: given a Vitali family `v`
for a locally finite measure `μ`, and another locally finite measure `ρ`, then for `μ`-almost
every `x` the ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges, when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family,
towards the Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ`.
This version assumes that `ρ` is absolutely continuous with respect to `μ`. The general version
without this superfluous assumption is `VitaliFamily.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv`.
-/
theorem ae_tendsto_rnDeriv_of_absolutelyContinuous :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (ρ.rnDeriv μ x)) := by
have A : (μ.withDensity (v.limRatioMeas hρ)).rnDeriv μ =ᵐ[μ] v.limRatioMeas hρ :=
rnDeriv_withDensity μ (v.limRatioMeas_measurable hρ)
rw [v.withDensity_limRatioMeas_eq hρ] at A
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_limRatioMeas hρ, A] with _ _ h'x
rwa [h'x]
end AbsolutelyContinuous
variable (ρ)
/-- Main theorem on differentiation of measures: given a Vitali family `v` for a locally finite
measure `μ`, and another locally finite measure `ρ`, then for `μ`-almost every `x` the
ratio `ρ a / μ a` converges, when `a` shrinks to `x` along the Vitali family, towards the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `ρ` with respect to `μ`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_rnDeriv :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (ρ.rnDeriv μ x)) := by
let t := μ.withDensity (ρ.rnDeriv μ)
have eq_add : ρ = ρ.singularPart μ + t := haveLebesgueDecomposition_add _ _
have A : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ρ.singularPart μ a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) :=
v.ae_eventually_measure_zero_of_singular (mutuallySingular_singularPart ρ μ)
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, t.rnDeriv μ x = ρ.rnDeriv μ x :=
rnDeriv_withDensity μ (measurable_rnDeriv ρ μ)
have C : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => t a / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (t.rnDeriv μ x)) :=
v.ae_tendsto_rnDeriv_of_absolutelyContinuous (withDensity_absolutelyContinuous _ _)
filter_upwards [A, B, C] with _ Ax Bx Cx
convert Ax.add Cx using 1
· ext1 a
conv_lhs => rw [eq_add]
simp only [Pi.add_apply, coe_add, ENNReal.add_div]
· simp only [Bx, zero_add]
/-! ### Lebesgue density points -/
/-- Given a measurable set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` converges when `a` shrinks to a typical
point `x` along a Vitali family. The limit is `1` for `x ∈ s` and `0` for `x ∉ s`. This shows that
almost every point of `s` is a Lebesgue density point for `s`. A version for non-measurable sets
holds, but it only gives the first conclusion, see `ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => μ (s ∩ a) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (s.indicator 1 x)) := by
haveI : IsLocallyFiniteMeasure (μ.restrict s) :=
isLocallyFiniteMeasure_of_le restrict_le_self
filter_upwards [ae_tendsto_rnDeriv v (μ.restrict s), rnDeriv_restrict_self μ hs]
intro x hx h'x
simpa only [h'x, restrict_apply' hs, inter_comm] using hx
/-- Given an arbitrary set `s`, then `μ (s ∩ a) / μ a` converges to `1` when `a` shrinks to a
typical point of `s` along a Vitali family. This shows that almost every point of `s` is a
Lebesgue density point for `s`. A stronger version for measurable sets is given
in `ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet`. -/
theorem ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div (s : Set α) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, Tendsto (fun a => μ (s ∩ a) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 1) := by
let t := toMeasurable μ s
have A :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s,
Tendsto (fun a => μ (t ∩ a) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (t.indicator 1 x)) := by
apply ae_mono restrict_le_self
apply ae_tendsto_measure_inter_div_of_measurableSet
exact measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
have B : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, t.indicator 1 x = (1 : ℝ≥0∞) := by
refine ae_restrict_of_ae_restrict_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable μ s) ?_
filter_upwards [ae_restrict_mem (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)] with _ hx
simp only [t, hx, Pi.one_apply, indicator_of_mem]
filter_upwards [A, B] with x hx h'x
rw [h'x] at hx
apply hx.congr' _
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_measurableSet x] with _ ha
congr 1
exact measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite ha _
/-! ### Lebesgue differentiation theorem -/
theorem ae_tendsto_lintegral_div' {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : Measurable f) (h'f : (∫⁻ y, f y ∂μ) ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, f y ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (f x)) := by
let ρ := μ.withDensity f
have : IsFiniteMeasure ρ := isFiniteMeasure_withDensity h'f
filter_upwards [ae_tendsto_rnDeriv v ρ, rnDeriv_withDensity μ hf] with x hx h'x
rw [← h'x]
apply hx.congr' _
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_measurableSet x] with a ha
rw [← withDensity_apply f ha]
theorem ae_tendsto_lintegral_div {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (h'f : (∫⁻ y, f y ∂μ) ≠ ∞) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, f y ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 (f x)) := by
have A : (∫⁻ y, hf.mk f y ∂μ) ≠ ∞ := by
convert h'f using 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
exact hf.ae_eq_mk.symm
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_lintegral_div' hf.measurable_mk A, hf.ae_eq_mk] with x hx h'x
rw [h'x]
convert hx using 1
ext1 a
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
exact ae_restrict_of_ae hf.ae_eq_mk
theorem ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div'_of_integrable {f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ)
(h'f : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
/- For every `c`, then `(∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - c‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a` tends almost everywhere to `‖f x - c‖`.
We apply this to a countable set of `c` which is dense in the range of `f`, to deduce the
desired convergence.
A minor technical inconvenience is that constants are not integrable, so to apply previous
lemmas we need to replace `c` with the restriction of `c` to a finite measure set `A n` in the
above sketch. -/
let A := MeasureTheory.Measure.finiteSpanningSetsInOpen' μ
rcases h'f.isSeparable_range with ⟨t, t_count, ht⟩
have main :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
∀ᵉ (n : ℕ) (c ∈ t),
Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - (A.set n).indicator (fun _ => c) y‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a)
(v.filterAt x) (𝓝 ‖f x - (A.set n).indicator (fun _ => c) x‖ₑ) := by
#adaptation_note /-- 2024-04-23
The next two lines were previously just `simp_rw [ae_all_iff, ae_ball_iff t_count]`. -/
simp_rw [ae_all_iff]
intro x; rw [ae_ball_iff t_count]; revert x
intro n c _
apply ae_tendsto_lintegral_div'
· refine (h'f.sub ?_).enorm
exact stronglyMeasurable_const.indicator (IsOpen.measurableSet (A.set_mem n))
· apply ne_of_lt
calc
∫⁻ y, ‖f y - (A.set n).indicator (fun _ : α => c) y‖ₑ ∂μ
≤ ∫⁻ y, ‖f y‖ₑ + ‖(A.set n).indicator (fun _ : α => c) y‖ₑ ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun x ↦ enorm_sub_le
_ = ∫⁻ y, ‖f y‖ₑ ∂μ + ∫⁻ y, ‖(A.set n).indicator (fun _ : α => c) y‖ₑ ∂μ :=
lintegral_add_left h'f.enorm _
_ < ∞ + ∞ :=
haveI I : Integrable ((A.set n).indicator fun _ : α => c) μ := by
simp only [integrable_indicator_iff (IsOpen.measurableSet (A.set_mem n)),
integrableOn_const, A.finite n, or_true]
ENNReal.add_lt_add hf.2 I.2
filter_upwards [main, v.ae_eventually_measure_pos] with x hx h'x
have M c (hc : c ∈ t) :
Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - c‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 ‖f x - c‖ₑ) := by
obtain ⟨n, xn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ A.set n := by simpa [← A.spanning] using mem_univ x
specialize hx n c hc
simp only [xn, indicator_of_mem] at hx
apply hx.congr' _
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds (IsOpen.mem_nhds (A.set_mem n) xn),
v.eventually_filterAt_measurableSet x] with a ha h'a
congr 1
apply setLIntegral_congr_fun h'a
filter_upwards with y hy using (by simp only [ha hy, indicator_of_mem])
apply ENNReal.tendsto_nhds_zero.2 fun ε εpos => ?_
obtain ⟨c, ct, xc⟩ : ∃ c ∈ t, ‖f x - c‖ₑ < ε / 2 := by
simp_rw [← edist_eq_enorm_sub]
have : f x ∈ closure t := ht (mem_range_self _)
exact EMetric.mem_closure_iff.1 this (ε / 2) (ENNReal.half_pos (ne_of_gt εpos))
filter_upwards [(tendsto_order.1 (M c ct)).2 (ε / 2) xc, h'x, v.eventually_measure_lt_top x] with
a ha h'a h''a
apply ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul
calc
(∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - c‖ₑ + ‖f x - c‖ₑ ∂μ := by
apply lintegral_mono fun x => ?_
simpa only [← edist_eq_enorm_sub] using edist_triangle_right _ _ _
_ = (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - c‖ₑ ∂μ) + ∫⁻ _ in a, ‖f x - c‖ₑ ∂μ :=
(lintegral_add_right _ measurable_const)
_ ≤ ε / 2 * μ a + ε / 2 * μ a := by
gcongr
· rw [ENNReal.div_lt_iff (Or.inl h'a.ne') (Or.inl h''a.ne)] at ha
exact ha.le
· simp only [lintegral_const, Measure.restrict_apply, MeasurableSet.univ, univ_inter]
gcongr
_ = ε * μ a := by rw [← add_mul, ENNReal.add_halves]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias ae_tendsto_lintegral_nnnorm_sub_div'_of_integrable :=
ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div'_of_integrable
theorem ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div_of_integrable {f : α → E} (hf : Integrable f μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
have I : Integrable (hf.1.mk f) μ := hf.congr hf.1.ae_eq_mk
filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div'_of_integrable I hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk,
hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx h'x
apply hx.congr _
intro a
congr 1
apply lintegral_congr_ae
apply ae_restrict_of_ae
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with y hy
rw [hy, h'x]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias ae_tendsto_lintegral_nnnorm_sub_div_of_integrable :=
ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div_of_integrable
theorem ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div {f : α → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖f y - f x‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
rcases hf.exists_nat_integrableOn with ⟨u, u_open, u_univ, hu⟩
have : ∀ n, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ,
Tendsto (fun a => (∫⁻ y in a, ‖(u n).indicator f y - (u n).indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) / μ a)
(v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by
intro n
apply ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div_of_integrable
exact (integrable_indicator_iff (u_open n).measurableSet).2 (hu n)
filter_upwards [ae_all_iff.2 this] with x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ : ∃ n, x ∈ u n := by simpa only [← u_univ, mem_iUnion] using mem_univ x
apply Tendsto.congr' _ (hx n)
filter_upwards [v.eventually_filterAt_subset_of_nhds ((u_open n).mem_nhds hn),
v.eventually_filterAt_measurableSet x] with a ha h'a
congr 1
refine setLIntegral_congr_fun h'a (Eventually.of_forall (fun y hy ↦ ?_))
rw [indicator_of_mem (ha hy) f, indicator_of_mem hn f]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-22")]
alias ae_tendsto_lintegral_nnnorm_sub_div := ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div
/-- *Lebesgue differentiation theorem*: for almost every point `x`, the
average of `‖f y - f x‖` on `a` tends to `0` as `a` shrinks to `x` along a Vitali family. -/
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Covering/Differentiation.lean | 886 | 902 | theorem ae_tendsto_average_norm_sub {f : α → E} (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun a => ⨍ y in a, ‖f y - f x‖ ∂μ) (v.filterAt x) (𝓝 0) := by | filter_upwards [v.ae_tendsto_lintegral_enorm_sub_div hf] with x hx
have := (ENNReal.tendsto_toReal ENNReal.zero_ne_top).comp hx
simp only [ENNReal.toReal_zero] at this
apply Tendsto.congr' _ this
filter_upwards [v.eventually_measure_lt_top x, v.eventually_filterAt_integrableOn x hf]
with a h'a h''a
simp only [Function.comp_apply, ENNReal.toReal_div, setAverage_eq, div_eq_inv_mul]
have A : IntegrableOn (fun y => (‖f y - f x‖₊ : ℝ)) a μ := by
simp_rw [coe_nnnorm]
exact (h''a.sub (integrableOn_const.2 (Or.inr h'a))).norm
dsimp [enorm]
rw [lintegral_coe_eq_integral _ A, ENNReal.toReal_ofReal (by positivity)]
simp only [coe_nnnorm, smul_eq_mul, measureReal_def]
/-- *Lebesgue differentiation theorem*: for almost every point `x`, the |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Data.Sum.Order
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.PPWithUniv
/-!
# Ordinals
Ordinals are defined as equivalences of well-ordered sets under order isomorphism. They are endowed
with a total order, where an ordinal is smaller than another one if it embeds into it as an
initial segment (or, equivalently, in any way). This total order is well founded.
## Main definitions
* `Ordinal`: the type of ordinals (in a given universe)
* `Ordinal.type r`: given a well-founded order `r`, this is the corresponding ordinal
* `Ordinal.typein r a`: given a well-founded order `r` on a type `α`, and `a : α`, the ordinal
corresponding to all elements smaller than `a`.
* `enum r ⟨o, h⟩`: given a well-order `r` on a type `α`, and an ordinal `o` strictly smaller than
the ordinal corresponding to `r` (this is the assumption `h`), returns the `o`-th element of `α`.
In other words, the elements of `α` can be enumerated using ordinals up to `type r`.
* `Ordinal.card o`: the cardinality of an ordinal `o`.
* `Ordinal.lift` lifts an ordinal in universe `u` to an ordinal in universe `max u v`.
For a version registering additionally that this is an initial segment embedding, see
`Ordinal.liftInitialSeg`.
For a version registering that it is a principal segment embedding if `u < v`, see
`Ordinal.liftPrincipalSeg`.
* `Ordinal.omega0` or `ω` is the order type of `ℕ`. It is called this to match `Cardinal.aleph0`
and so that the omega function can be named `Ordinal.omega`. This definition is universe
polymorphic: `Ordinal.omega0.{u} : Ordinal.{u}` (contrast with `ℕ : Type`, which lives in
a specific universe). In some cases the universe level has to be given explicitly.
* `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`.
The main properties of addition (and the other operations on ordinals) are stated and proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
Here, we only introduce it and prove its basic properties to deduce the fact that the order on
ordinals is total (and well founded).
* `succ o` is the successor of the ordinal `o`.
* `Cardinal.ord c`: when `c` is a cardinal, `ord c` is the smallest ordinal with this cardinality.
It is the canonical way to represent a cardinal with an ordinal.
A conditionally complete linear order with bot structure is registered on ordinals, where `⊥` is
`0`, the ordinal corresponding to the empty type, and `Inf` is the minimum for nonempty sets and `0`
for the empty set by convention.
## Notations
* `ω` is a notation for the first infinite ordinal in the locale `Ordinal`.
-/
assert_not_exists Module Field
noncomputable section
open Function Cardinal Set Equiv Order
open scoped Cardinal InitialSeg
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
{r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} {t : γ → γ → Prop}
/-! ### Definition of ordinals -/
/-- Bundled structure registering a well order on a type. Ordinals will be defined as a quotient
of this type. -/
structure WellOrder : Type (u + 1) where
/-- The underlying type of the order. -/
α : Type u
/-- The underlying relation of the order. -/
r : α → α → Prop
/-- The proposition that `r` is a well-ordering for `α`. -/
wo : IsWellOrder α r
attribute [instance] WellOrder.wo
namespace WellOrder
instance inhabited : Inhabited WellOrder :=
⟨⟨PEmpty, _, inferInstanceAs (IsWellOrder PEmpty EmptyRelation)⟩⟩
end WellOrder
/-- Equivalence relation on well orders on arbitrary types in universe `u`, given by order
isomorphism. -/
instance Ordinal.isEquivalent : Setoid WellOrder where
r := fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≃r s)
iseqv :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨RelIso.refl _⟩, fun ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.symm⟩, fun ⟨e₁⟩ ⟨e₂⟩ => ⟨e₁.trans e₂⟩⟩
/-- `Ordinal.{u}` is the type of well orders in `Type u`, up to order isomorphism. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def Ordinal : Type (u + 1) :=
Quotient Ordinal.isEquivalent
/-- A "canonical" type order-isomorphic to the ordinal `o`, living in the same universe. This is
defined through the axiom of choice.
Use this over `Iio o` only when it is paramount to have a `Type u` rather than a `Type (u + 1)`. -/
def Ordinal.toType (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Type u :=
o.out.α
instance hasWellFounded_toType (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedRelation o.toType :=
⟨o.out.r, o.out.wo.wf⟩
instance linearOrder_toType (o : Ordinal) : LinearOrder o.toType :=
@IsWellOrder.linearOrder _ o.out.r o.out.wo
instance wellFoundedLT_toType_lt (o : Ordinal) : WellFoundedLT o.toType :=
o.out.wo.toIsWellFounded
namespace Ordinal
noncomputable instance (o : Ordinal) : SuccOrder o.toType :=
SuccOrder.ofLinearWellFoundedLT o.toType
/-! ### Basic properties of the order type -/
/-- The order type of a well order is an ordinal. -/
def type (r : α → α → Prop) [wo : IsWellOrder α r] : Ordinal :=
⟦⟨α, r, wo⟩⟧
/-- `typeLT α` is an abbreviation for the order type of the `<` relation of `α`. -/
scoped notation "typeLT " α:70 => @Ordinal.type α (· < ·) inferInstance
instance zero : Zero Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PEmpty⟩
instance inhabited : Inhabited Ordinal :=
⟨0⟩
instance one : One Ordinal :=
⟨type <| @EmptyRelation PUnit⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_toType (o : Ordinal) : typeLT o.toType = o :=
o.out_eq
theorem type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
type r = type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) :=
Quotient.eq'
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_type_eq {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≃r s) : type r = type s :=
type_eq.2 ⟨h⟩
theorem type_eq_zero_of_empty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [IsEmpty α] : type r = 0 :=
(RelIso.relIsoOfIsEmpty r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 0 ↔ IsEmpty α :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h
s.toEquiv.isEmpty,
@type_eq_zero_of_empty α r _⟩
theorem type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty [IsWellOrder α r] : type r ≠ 0 ↔ Nonempty α := by simp
theorem type_ne_zero_of_nonempty (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [h : Nonempty α] : type r ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty.2 h
theorem type_pEmpty : type (@EmptyRelation PEmpty) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem type_empty : type (@EmptyRelation Empty) = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
theorem type_eq_one_of_unique (r) [IsWellOrder α r] [Nonempty α] [Subsingleton α] : type r = 1 := by
cases nonempty_unique α
exact (RelIso.ofUniqueOfIrrefl r _).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_eq_one_iff_unique [IsWellOrder α r] : type r = 1 ↔ Nonempty (Unique α) :=
⟨fun h ↦ let ⟨s⟩ := type_eq.1 h; ⟨s.toEquiv.unique⟩,
fun ⟨_⟩ ↦ type_eq_one_of_unique r⟩
theorem type_pUnit : type (@EmptyRelation PUnit) = 1 :=
rfl
theorem type_unit : type (@EmptyRelation Unit) = 1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_empty_iff_eq_zero {o : Ordinal} : IsEmpty o.toType ↔ o = 0 := by
rw [← @type_eq_zero_iff_isEmpty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
instance isEmpty_toType_zero : IsEmpty (toType 0) :=
toType_empty_iff_eq_zero.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem toType_nonempty_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : Nonempty o.toType ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [← @type_ne_zero_iff_nonempty o.toType (· < ·), type_toType]
protected theorem one_ne_zero : (1 : Ordinal) ≠ 0 :=
type_ne_zero_of_nonempty _
instance nontrivial : Nontrivial Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨⟨1, 0, Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩⟩
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r], C (type r)) : C o :=
Quot.inductionOn o fun ⟨α, r, wo⟩ => @H α r wo
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₂` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₂ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s], C (type r) (type s)) : C o₁ o₂ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ o₁ o₂ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ => @H α r wo₁ β s wo₂
/-- `Quotient.inductionOn₃` specialized to ordinals.
Not to be confused with well-founded recursion `Ordinal.induction`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOn₃ {C : Ordinal → Ordinal → Ordinal → Prop} (o₁ o₂ o₃ : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α r) [IsWellOrder α r] (β s) [IsWellOrder β s] (γ t) [IsWellOrder γ t],
C (type r) (type s) (type t)) : C o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, wo₁⟩ ⟨β, s, wo₂⟩ ⟨γ, t, wo₃⟩ =>
@H α r wo₁ β s wo₂ γ t wo₃
open Classical in
/-- To prove a result on ordinals, it suffices to prove it for order types of well-orders. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem inductionOnWellOrder {C : Ordinal → Prop} (o : Ordinal)
(H : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], C (typeLT α)) : C o :=
inductionOn o fun α r wo ↦ @H α (linearOrderOfSTO r) wo.toIsWellFounded
open Classical in
/-- To define a function on ordinals, it suffices to define them on order types of well-orders.
Since `LinearOrder` is data-carrying, `liftOnWellOrder_type` is not a definitional equality, unlike
`Quotient.liftOn_mk` which is always def-eq. -/
def liftOnWellOrder {δ : Sort v} (o : Ordinal) (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) : δ :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w ↦ @f w.α (linearOrderOfSTO w.r) w.wo.toIsWellFounded)
fun w₁ w₂ h ↦ @c
w₁.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₁.r) w₁.wo.toIsWellFounded
w₂.α (linearOrderOfSTO w₂.r) w₂.wo.toIsWellFounded
(Quotient.sound h)
@[simp]
theorem liftOnWellOrder_type {δ : Sort v} (f : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α], δ)
(c : ∀ (α) [LinearOrder α] [WellFoundedLT α] (β) [LinearOrder β] [WellFoundedLT β],
typeLT α = typeLT β → f α = f β) {γ} [LinearOrder γ] [WellFoundedLT γ] :
liftOnWellOrder (typeLT γ) f c = f γ := by
change Quotient.liftOn' ⟦_⟧ _ _ = _
rw [Quotient.liftOn'_mk]
congr
exact LinearOrder.ext_lt fun _ _ ↦ Iff.rfl
/-! ### The order on ordinals -/
/--
For `Ordinal`:
* less-equal is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r ≤ type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as an *initial* segment of `s`.
* less-than is defined such that well orders `r` and `s` satisfy `type r < type s` if there exists
a function embedding `r` as a *principal* segment of `s`.
Note that most of the relevant results on initial and principal segments are proved in the
`Order.InitialSeg` file.
-/
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder Ordinal where
le a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≼i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨f.symm.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.toInitialSeg⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨f.toInitialSeg.trans <| h.trans g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩⟩
lt a b :=
Quotient.liftOn₂ a b (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => Nonempty (r ≺i s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => propext
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f.symm <| h.transRelIso g⟩,
fun ⟨h⟩ => ⟨PrincipalSeg.relIsoTrans f <| h.transRelIso g.symm⟩⟩
le_refl := Quot.ind fun ⟨_, _, _⟩ => ⟨InitialSeg.refl _⟩
le_trans a b c :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ a b c fun _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => ⟨f.trans g⟩
lt_iff_le_not_le a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ =>
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨⟨f⟩, fun ⟨g⟩ => (f.transInitial g).irrefl⟩, fun ⟨⟨f⟩, h⟩ =>
f.principalSumRelIso.recOn (fun g => ⟨g⟩) fun g => (h ⟨g.symm.toInitialSeg⟩).elim⟩
le_antisymm a b :=
Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun _ _ ⟨h₁⟩ ⟨h₂⟩ =>
Quot.sound ⟨InitialSeg.antisymm h₁ h₂⟩
instance : LinearOrder Ordinal :=
{inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder Ordinal) with
le_total := fun a b => Quotient.inductionOn₂ a b fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ =>
(InitialSeg.total r s).recOn (fun f => Or.inl ⟨f⟩) fun f => Or.inr ⟨f⟩
toDecidableLE := Classical.decRel _ }
theorem _root_.InitialSeg.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≼i s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h⟩
theorem _root_.RelEmbedding.ordinal_type_le {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ↪r s) : type r ≤ type s :=
⟨h.collapse⟩
theorem _root_.PrincipalSeg.ordinal_type_lt {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (h : r ≺i s) : type r < type s :=
⟨h⟩
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le (o : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ o :=
inductionOn o fun _ r _ => (InitialSeg.ofIsEmpty _ r).ordinal_type_le
instance : OrderBot Ordinal where
bot := 0
bot_le := Ordinal.zero_le
@[simp]
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Ordinal) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instIsEmptyIioZero : IsEmpty (Iio (0 : Ordinal)) := by
simp [← bot_eq_zero]
@[simp]
protected theorem le_zero {o : Ordinal} : o ≤ 0 ↔ o = 0 :=
le_bot_iff
protected theorem pos_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 0 < o ↔ o ≠ 0 :=
bot_lt_iff_ne_bot
protected theorem not_lt_zero (o : Ordinal) : ¬o < 0 :=
not_lt_bot
theorem eq_zero_or_pos : ∀ a : Ordinal, a = 0 ∨ 0 < a :=
eq_bot_or_bot_lt
instance : ZeroLEOneClass Ordinal :=
⟨Ordinal.zero_le _⟩
instance instNeZeroOne : NeZero (1 : Ordinal) :=
⟨Ordinal.one_ne_zero⟩
theorem type_le_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem type_le_iff' {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r ≤ type s ↔ Nonempty (r ↪r s) :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f⟩, fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨f.collapse⟩⟩
theorem type_lt_iff {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type r < type s ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- Given two ordinals `α ≤ β`, then `initialSegToType α β` is the initial segment embedding of
`α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def initialSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α ≤ β) : α.toType ≤i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_le_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-- Given two ordinals `α < β`, then `principalSegToType α β` is the principal segment embedding
of `α.toType` into `β.toType`. -/
def principalSegToType {α β : Ordinal} (h : α < β) : α.toType <i β.toType := by
apply Classical.choice (type_lt_iff.mp _)
rwa [type_toType, type_toType]
/-! ### Enumerating elements in a well-order with ordinals -/
/-- The order type of an element inside a well order.
This is registered as a principal segment embedding into the ordinals, with top `type r`. -/
def typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : @PrincipalSeg α Ordinal.{u} r (· < ·) := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone _ fun a b ha ↦
((PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a).codRestrict _ ?_ ?_).ordinal_type_lt, type r, fun a ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨c, hc⟩
exact trans hc ha
· exact ha
· rintro ⟨b, rfl⟩
exact (PrincipalSeg.ofElement _ _).ordinal_type_lt
· refine inductionOn a ?_
rintro β s wo ⟨g⟩
exact ⟨_, g.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_subrel (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
type (Subrel r (r · a)) = typein r a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (typein r).top = type r :=
rfl
theorem typein_lt_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) : typein r a < type r :=
(typein r).lt_top a
theorem typein_lt_self {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toType) : typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) i < o := by
simp_rw [← type_toType o]
apply typein_lt_type
@[simp]
theorem typein_top {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : typein s f.top = type r :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem typein_lt_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a < typein r b ↔ r a b :=
(typein r).map_rel_iff
@[simp]
theorem typein_le_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b : α} :
typein r a ≤ typein r b ↔ ¬r b a := by
rw [← not_lt, typein_lt_typein]
theorem typein_injective (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : Injective (typein r) :=
(typein r).injective
theorem typein_inj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {a b} : typein r a = typein r b ↔ a = b :=
(typein_injective r).eq_iff
theorem mem_range_typein_iff (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) ↔ o < type r :=
(typein r).mem_range_iff_rel
theorem typein_surj (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
o ∈ Set.range (typein r) :=
(typein r).mem_range_of_rel_top h
theorem typein_surjOn (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
Set.SurjOn (typein r) Set.univ (Set.Iio (type r)) :=
(typein r).surjOn
/-- A well order `r` is order-isomorphic to the set of ordinals smaller than `type r`.
`enum r ⟨o, h⟩` is the `o`-th element of `α` ordered by `r`.
That is, `enum` maps an initial segment of the ordinals, those less than the order type of `r`, to
the elements of `α`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply_coe]
def enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : (· < · : Iio (type r) → Iio (type r) → Prop) ≃r r :=
(typein r).subrelIso
@[simp]
theorem typein_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o} (h : o < type r) :
typein r (enum r ⟨o, h⟩) = o :=
(typein r).apply_subrelIso _
theorem enum_type {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : s ≺i r) {h : type s < type r} : enum r ⟨type s, h⟩ = f.top :=
(typein r).injective <| (typein_enum _ _).trans (typein_top _).symm
@[simp]
theorem enum_typein (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (a : α) :
enum r ⟨typein r a, typein_lt_type r a⟩ = a :=
enum_type (PrincipalSeg.ofElement r a)
theorem enum_lt_enum {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₁ < o₂ :=
(enum _).map_rel_iff
theorem enum_le_enum (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
¬r (enum r o₁) (enum r o₂) ↔ o₂ ≤ o₁ := by
rw [enum_lt_enum (r := r), not_lt]
-- TODO: generalize to other well-orders
@[simp]
theorem enum_le_enum' (a : Ordinal) {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type (· < ·))} :
enum (· < ·) o₁ ≤ enum (α := a.toType) (· < ·) o₂ ↔ o₁ ≤ o₂ := by
rw [← enum_le_enum, not_lt]
theorem enum_inj {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] {o₁ o₂ : Iio (type r)} :
enum r o₁ = enum r o₂ ↔ o₁ = o₂ :=
EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq _
theorem enum_zero_le {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (h0 : 0 < type r) (a : α) :
¬r a (enum r ⟨0, h0⟩) := by
rw [← enum_typein r a, enum_le_enum r]
apply Ordinal.zero_le
theorem enum_zero_le' {o : Ordinal} (h0 : 0 < o) (a : o.toType) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, type_toType _ ▸ h0⟩ ≤ a := by
rw [← not_lt]
apply enum_zero_le
theorem relIso_enum' {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) :
∀ (hr : o < type r) (hs : o < type s), f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hs⟩ := by
refine inductionOn o ?_; rintro γ t wo ⟨g⟩ ⟨h⟩
rw [enum_type g, enum_type (g.transRelIso f)]; rfl
theorem relIso_enum {α β : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) (o : Ordinal) (hr : o < type r) :
f (enum r ⟨o, hr⟩) = enum s ⟨o, hr.trans_eq (Quotient.sound ⟨f⟩)⟩ :=
relIso_enum' _ _ _ _
/-- The order isomorphism between ordinals less than `o` and `o.toType`. -/
@[simps! -isSimp]
noncomputable def enumIsoToType (o : Ordinal) : Set.Iio o ≃o o.toType where
toFun x := enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨x.1, type_toType _ ▸ x.2⟩
invFun x := ⟨typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x, typein_lt_self x⟩
left_inv _ := Subtype.ext_val (typein_enum _ _)
right_inv _ := enum_typein _ _
map_rel_iff' := enum_le_enum' _
instance small_Iio (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio o) :=
⟨_, ⟨(enumIsoToType _).toEquiv⟩⟩
instance small_Iic (o : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic o) := by
rw [← Iio_union_right]
infer_instance
instance small_Ico (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Ordinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `o ≠ 0`. -/
def toTypeOrderBot {o : Ordinal} (ho : o ≠ 0) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' (by rwa [Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero])
/-- `o.toType` is an `OrderBot` whenever `0 < o`. -/
@[deprecated "use toTypeOrderBot" (since := "2025-02-13")]
def toTypeOrderBotOfPos {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) : OrderBot o.toType where
bot := (enum (· < ·)) ⟨0, _⟩
bot_le := enum_zero_le' ho
theorem enum_zero_eq_bot {o : Ordinal} (ho : 0 < o) :
enum (α := o.toType) (· < ·) ⟨0, by rwa [type_toType]⟩ =
have H := toTypeOrderBot (o := o) (by rintro rfl; simp at ho)
(⊥ : o.toType) :=
rfl
theorem lt_wf : @WellFounded Ordinal (· < ·) :=
wellFounded_iff_wellFounded_subrel.mpr (·.induction_on fun ⟨_, _, wo⟩ ↦
RelHomClass.wellFounded (enum _) wo.wf)
instance wellFoundedRelation : WellFoundedRelation Ordinal :=
⟨(· < ·), lt_wf⟩
instance wellFoundedLT : WellFoundedLT Ordinal :=
⟨lt_wf⟩
instance : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot Ordinal :=
WellFoundedLT.conditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot _
/-- Reformulation of well founded induction on ordinals as a lemma that works with the
`induction` tactic, as in `induction i using Ordinal.induction with | h i IH => ?_`. -/
theorem induction {p : Ordinal.{u} → Prop} (i : Ordinal.{u}) (h : ∀ j, (∀ k, k < j → p k) → p j) :
p i :=
lt_wf.induction i h
theorem typein_apply {α β} {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s]
(f : r ≼i s) (a : α) : typein s (f a) = typein r a := by
rw [← f.transPrincipal_apply _ a, (f.transPrincipal _).eq]
/-! ### Cardinality of ordinals -/
/-- The cardinal of an ordinal is the cardinality of any type on which a relation with that order
type is defined. -/
def card : Ordinal → Cardinal :=
Quotient.map WellOrder.α fun _ _ ⟨e⟩ => ⟨e.toEquiv⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_type (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] : card (type r) = #α :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_typein {r : α → α → Prop} [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) :
#{ y // r y x } = (typein r x).card :=
rfl
theorem card_le_card {o₁ o₂ : Ordinal} : o₁ ≤ o₂ → card o₁ ≤ card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ _ _ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ ⟨⟨⟨f, _⟩, _⟩⟩ => ⟨f⟩
@[simp]
theorem card_zero : card 0 = 0 := mk_eq_zero _
@[simp]
theorem card_one : card 1 = 1 := mk_eq_one _
/-! ### Lifting ordinals to a higher universe -/
-- Porting note: Needed to add universe hint .{u} below
/-- The universe lift operation for ordinals, which embeds `Ordinal.{u}` as
a proper initial segment of `Ordinal.{v}` for `v > u`. For the initial segment version,
see `liftInitialSeg`. -/
@[pp_with_univ]
def lift (o : Ordinal.{v}) : Ordinal.{max v u} :=
Quotient.liftOn o (fun w => type <| ULift.down.{u} ⁻¹'o w.r) fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ ⟨f⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem type_uLift (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] :
type (ULift.down ⁻¹'o r) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
rfl
theorem _root_.RelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≃r s) : lift.{v} (type r) = lift.{u} (type s) :=
((RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <|
f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_preimage {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (f : β ≃ α) :
type (f ⁻¹'o r) = type r :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_type_eq
@[simp]
theorem type_lift_preimage (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
(f : β ≃ α) : lift.{u} (type (f ⁻¹'o r)) = lift.{v} (type r) :=
(RelIso.preimage f r).ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- `lift.{max u v, u}` equals `lift.{v, u}`.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't seem to work. -/
theorem lift_umax : lift.{max u v, u} = lift.{v, u} :=
funext fun a =>
inductionOn a fun _ r _ =>
Quotient.sound ⟨(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to a lower or equal universe equals itself.
Unfortunately, the simp lemma doesn't work. -/
theorem lift_id' (a : Ordinal) : lift a = a :=
inductionOn a fun _ r _ => Quotient.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r⟩
/-- An ordinal lifted to the same universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_id : ∀ a, lift.{u, u} a = a :=
lift_id'.{u, u}
/-- An ordinal lifted to the zero universe equals itself. -/
@[simp]
theorem lift_uzero (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{0} a = a :=
lift_id' a
theorem lift_type_le {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) ≤ lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≼i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).toInitialSeg.trans
(f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg)
theorem lift_type_eq {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) = lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≃r s) := by
refine Quotient.eq'.trans ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm.trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s)
· exact (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).trans <| f.trans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm
theorem lift_type_lt {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {r s} [IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] :
lift.{max v w} (type r) < lift.{max u w} (type s) ↔ Nonempty (r ≺i s) := by
constructor <;> refine fun ⟨f⟩ ↦ ⟨?_⟩
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r).symm).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).toInitialSeg
· exact (f.relIsoTrans (RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift r)).transInitial
(RelIso.preimage Equiv.ulift s).symm.toInitialSeg
@[simp]
theorem lift_le {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a ≤ lift.{u, v} b ↔ a ≤ b :=
inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ => by
rw [← lift_umax]
exact lift_type_le.{_,_,u}
@[simp]
theorem lift_inj {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a = lift.{u, v} b ↔ a = b := by
simp_rw [le_antisymm_iff, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_lt {a b : Ordinal} : lift.{u, v} a < lift.{u, v} b ↔ a < b := by
simp_rw [lt_iff_le_not_le, lift_le]
@[simp]
theorem lift_typein_top {r : α → α → Prop} {s : β → β → Prop}
[IsWellOrder α r] [IsWellOrder β s] (f : r ≺i s) : lift.{u} (typein s f.top) = lift (type r) :=
f.subrelIso.ordinal_lift_type_eq
/-- Initial segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as an initial segment when `u ≤ v`. -/
def liftInitialSeg : Ordinal.{v} ≤i Ordinal.{max u v} := by
refine ⟨RelEmbedding.ofMonotone lift.{u} (by simp),
fun a b ↦ Ordinal.inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_id'.{max u v} (type s),
← lift_umax.{v, u}, lift_type_lt] at h
obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
use typein r f.top
rw [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe, ← lift_umax, lift_typein_top, lift_id']
@[simp]
theorem liftInitialSeg_coe : (liftInitialSeg.{v, u} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{v, u} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_lift (a : Ordinal.{u}) : lift.{w} (lift.{v} a) = lift.{max v w} a :=
(liftInitialSeg.trans liftInitialSeg).eq liftInitialSeg a
@[simp]
theorem lift_zero : lift 0 = 0 :=
type_eq_zero_of_empty _
@[simp]
theorem lift_one : lift 1 = 1 :=
type_eq_one_of_unique _
@[simp]
theorem lift_card (a) : Cardinal.lift.{u, v} (card a) = card (lift.{u} a) :=
inductionOn a fun _ _ _ => rfl
theorem mem_range_lift_of_le {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} (h : b ≤ lift.{v} a) :
b ∈ Set.range lift.{v} :=
liftInitialSeg.mem_range_of_le h
theorem le_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b ≤ lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' ≤ a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.le_apply_iff
theorem lt_lift_iff {a : Ordinal.{u}} {b : Ordinal.{max u v}} :
b < lift.{v} a ↔ ∃ a' < a, lift.{v} a' = b :=
liftInitialSeg.lt_apply_iff
/-! ### The first infinite ordinal ω -/
/-- `ω` is the first infinite ordinal, defined as the order type of `ℕ`. -/
def omega0 : Ordinal.{u} :=
lift (typeLT ℕ)
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "ω" => Ordinal.omega0
/-- Note that the presence of this lemma makes `simp [omega0]` form a loop. -/
@[simp]
theorem type_nat_lt : typeLT ℕ = ω :=
(lift_id _).symm
@[simp]
theorem card_omega0 : card ω = ℵ₀ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem lift_omega0 : lift ω = ω :=
lift_lift _
/-!
### Definition and first properties of addition on ordinals
In this paragraph, we introduce the addition on ordinals, and prove just enough properties to
deduce that the order on ordinals is total (and therefore well-founded). Further properties of
the addition, together with properties of the other operations, are proved in
`Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Arithmetic.lean`.
-/
/-- `o₁ + o₂` is the order on the disjoint union of `o₁` and `o₂` obtained by declaring that
every element of `o₁` is smaller than every element of `o₂`. -/
instance add : Add Ordinal.{u} :=
⟨fun o₁ o₂ => Quotient.liftOn₂ o₁ o₂ (fun ⟨_, r, _⟩ ⟨_, s, _⟩ => type (Sum.Lex r s))
fun _ _ _ _ ⟨f⟩ ⟨g⟩ => (RelIso.sumLexCongr f g).ordinal_type_eq⟩
instance addMonoidWithOne : AddMonoidWithOne Ordinal.{u} where
add := (· + ·)
zero := 0
one := 1
zero_add o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(emptySum PEmpty α).symm, Sum.lex_inr_inr⟩⟩
add_zero o :=
inductionOn o fun α _ _ =>
Eq.symm <| Quotient.sound ⟨⟨(sumEmpty α PEmpty).symm, Sum.lex_inl_inl⟩⟩
add_assoc o₁ o₂ o₃ :=
Quotient.inductionOn₃ o₁ o₂ o₃ fun ⟨α, r, _⟩ ⟨β, s, _⟩ ⟨γ, t, _⟩ =>
Quot.sound
⟨⟨sumAssoc _ _ _, by
intros a b
rcases a with (⟨a | a⟩ | a) <;> rcases b with (⟨b | b⟩ | b) <;>
simp only [sumAssoc_apply_inl_inl, sumAssoc_apply_inl_inr, sumAssoc_apply_inr,
Sum.lex_inl_inl, Sum.lex_inr_inr, Sum.Lex.sep, Sum.lex_inr_inl]⟩⟩
nsmul := nsmulRec
@[simp]
theorem card_add (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : card (o₁ + o₂) = card o₁ + card o₂ :=
inductionOn o₁ fun _ __ => inductionOn o₂ fun _ _ _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem type_sum_lex {α β : Type u} (r : α → α → Prop) (s : β → β → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r]
[IsWellOrder β s] : type (Sum.Lex r s) = type r + type s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem card_nat (n : ℕ) : card.{u} n = n := by
induction n <;> [simp; simp only [card_add, card_one, Nat.cast_succ, *]]
@[simp]
theorem card_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
card.{u} ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
card_nat n
instance instAddLeftMono : AddLeftMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · Sum.inl (Sum.inr ∘ f)) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
instance instAddRightMono : AddRightMono Ordinal.{u} where
elim c a b := by
refine inductionOn₃ a b c fun α r _ β s _ γ t _ ⟨f⟩ ↦
(RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · (Sum.inl ∘ f) Sum.inr) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simp [f.map_rel_iff]
theorem le_add_right (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ a + b := by
simpa only [add_zero] using add_le_add_left (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem le_add_left (a b : Ordinal) : a ≤ b + a := by
simpa only [zero_add] using add_le_add_right (Ordinal.zero_le b) a
theorem max_zero_left : ∀ a : Ordinal, max 0 a = a :=
max_bot_left
theorem max_zero_right : ∀ a : Ordinal, max a 0 = a :=
max_bot_right
@[simp]
theorem max_eq_zero {a b : Ordinal} : max a b = 0 ↔ a = 0 ∧ b = 0 :=
max_eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf (∅ : Set Ordinal) = 0 :=
dif_neg Set.not_nonempty_empty
/-! ### Successor order properties -/
private theorem succ_le_iff' {a b : Ordinal} : a + 1 ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
refine inductionOn₂ a b fun α r _ β s _ ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> rintro ⟨f⟩
· refine ⟨((InitialSeg.leAdd _ _).trans f).toPrincipalSeg fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa using h (f (Sum.inr PUnit.unit))
· apply (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone (Sum.recOn · f fun _ ↦ f.top) ?_).ordinal_type_le
simpa [f.map_rel_iff] using f.lt_top
instance : NoMaxOrder Ordinal :=
⟨fun _ => ⟨_, succ_le_iff'.1 le_rfl⟩⟩
instance : SuccOrder Ordinal.{u} :=
SuccOrder.ofSuccLeIff (fun o => o + 1) succ_le_iff'
instance : SuccAddOrder Ordinal := ⟨fun _ => rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_one_eq_succ (o : Ordinal) : o + 1 = succ o :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Ordinal) = 1 :=
zero_add 1
-- Porting note: Proof used to be rfl
@[simp]
theorem succ_one : succ (1 : Ordinal) = 2 := by congr; simp only [Nat.unaryCast, zero_add]
theorem add_succ (o₁ o₂ : Ordinal) : o₁ + succ o₂ = succ (o₁ + o₂) :=
(add_assoc _ _ _).symm
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {o : Ordinal} : 1 ≤ o ↔ o ≠ 0 := by
rw [Order.one_le_iff_pos, Ordinal.pos_iff_ne_zero]
theorem succ_pos (o : Ordinal) : 0 < succ o :=
bot_lt_succ o
theorem succ_ne_zero (o : Ordinal) : succ o ≠ 0 :=
ne_of_gt <| succ_pos o
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {a : Ordinal} : a < 1 ↔ a = 0 := by
simpa using @lt_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _ _
theorem le_one_iff {a : Ordinal} : a ≤ 1 ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by
simpa using @le_succ_bot_iff _ _ _ a _
@[simp]
theorem card_succ (o : Ordinal) : card (succ o) = card o + 1 := by
simp only [← add_one_eq_succ, card_add, card_one]
theorem natCast_succ (n : ℕ) : ↑n.succ = succ (n : Ordinal) :=
rfl
instance uniqueIioOne : Unique (Iio (1 : Ordinal)) where
default := ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩
uniq a := Subtype.ext <| lt_one_iff_zero.1 a.2
@[simp]
theorem Iio_one_default_eq : (default : Iio (1 : Ordinal)) = ⟨0, zero_lt_one' Ordinal⟩ :=
rfl
instance uniqueToTypeOne : Unique (toType 1) where
default := enum (α := toType 1) (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩
uniq a := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) a]
congr
rw [← lt_one_iff_zero]
apply typein_lt_self
theorem one_toType_eq (x : toType 1) : x = enum (· < ·) ⟨0, by simp⟩ :=
Unique.eq_default x
/-! ### Extra properties of typein and enum -/
-- TODO: use `enumIsoToType` for lemmas on `toType` rather than `enum` and `typein`.
@[simp]
theorem typein_one_toType (x : toType 1) : typein (α := toType 1) (· < ·) x = 0 := by
rw [one_toType_eq x, typein_enum]
theorem typein_le_typein' (o : Ordinal) {x y : o.toType} :
typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) x ≤ typein (α := o.toType) (· < ·) y ↔ x ≤ y := by
simp
theorem le_enum_succ {o : Ordinal} (a : (succ o).toType) :
a ≤ enum (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) ⟨o, (type_toType _ ▸ lt_succ o)⟩ := by
rw [← enum_typein (α := (succ o).toType) (· < ·) a, enum_le_enum', Subtype.mk_le_mk,
← lt_succ_iff]
apply typein_lt_self
/-! ### Universal ordinal -/
-- intended to be used with explicit universe parameters
/-- `univ.{u v}` is the order type of the ordinals of `Type u` as a member
of `Ordinal.{v}` (when `u < v`). It is an inaccessible cardinal. -/
@[pp_with_univ, nolint checkUnivs]
def univ : Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
lift.{v, u + 1} (typeLT Ordinal)
theorem univ_id : univ.{u, u + 1} = typeLT Ordinal :=
lift_id _
@[simp]
theorem lift_univ : lift.{w} univ.{u, v} = univ.{u, max v w} :=
lift_lift _
theorem univ_umax : univ.{u, max (u + 1) v} = univ.{u, v} :=
congr_fun lift_umax _
/-- Principal segment version of the lift operation on ordinals, embedding `Ordinal.{u}` in
`Ordinal.{v}` as a principal segment when `u < v`. -/
def liftPrincipalSeg : Ordinal.{u} <i Ordinal.{max (u + 1) v} :=
⟨↑liftInitialSeg.{max (u + 1) v, u}, univ.{u, v}, by
refine fun b => inductionOn b ?_; intro β s _
rw [univ, ← lift_umax]; constructor <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨a, e⟩ := h
rw [← e]
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _
exact lift_type_lt.{u, u + 1, max (u + 1) v}.2 ⟨typein r⟩
· rw [← lift_id (type s)] at h ⊢
obtain ⟨f⟩ := lift_type_lt.{_,_,v}.1 h
obtain ⟨f, a, hf⟩ := f
exists a
revert hf
-- Porting note: apply inductionOn does not work, refine does
refine inductionOn a ?_
intro α r _ hf
refine lift_type_eq.{u, max (u + 1) v, max (u + 1) v}.2
⟨(RelIso.ofSurjective (RelEmbedding.ofMonotone ?_ ?_) ?_).symm⟩
· exact fun b => enum r ⟨f b, (hf _).1 ⟨_, rfl⟩⟩
· refine fun a b h => (typein_lt_typein r).1 ?_
rw [typein_enum, typein_enum]
exact f.map_rel_iff.2 h
· intro a'
obtain ⟨b, e⟩ := (hf _).2 (typein_lt_type _ a')
exists b
simp only [RelEmbedding.ofMonotone_coe]
simp [e]⟩
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_coe :
(liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v} : Ordinal → Ordinal) = lift.{max (u + 1) v} :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top : (liftPrincipalSeg.{u, v}).top = univ.{u, v} :=
rfl
theorem liftPrincipalSeg_top' : liftPrincipalSeg.{u, u + 1}.top = typeLT Ordinal := by
simp only [liftPrincipalSeg_top, univ_id]
end Ordinal
/-! ### Representing a cardinal with an ordinal -/
namespace Cardinal
open Ordinal
@[simp]
theorem mk_toType (o : Ordinal) : #o.toType = o.card :=
(Ordinal.card_type _).symm.trans <| by rw [Ordinal.type_toType]
/-- The ordinal corresponding to a cardinal `c` is the least ordinal
whose cardinal is `c`. For the order-embedding version, see `ord.order_embedding`. -/
def ord (c : Cardinal) : Ordinal :=
let F := fun α : Type u => ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2
Quot.liftOn c F
(by
suffices ∀ {α β}, α ≈ β → F α ≤ F β from
fun α β h => (this h).antisymm (this (Setoid.symm h))
rintro α β ⟨f⟩
refine le_ciInf_iff'.2 fun i => ?_
haveI := @RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ (f ⁻¹'o i.1) _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2
exact
(ciInf_le' _
(Subtype.mk (f ⁻¹'o i.val)
(@RelEmbedding.isWellOrder _ _ _ _ (↑(RelIso.preimage f i.1)) i.2))).trans_eq
(Quot.sound ⟨RelIso.preimage f i.1⟩))
theorem ord_eq_Inf (α : Type u) : ord #α = ⨅ r : { r // IsWellOrder α r }, @type α r.1 r.2 :=
rfl
theorem ord_eq (α) : ∃ (r : α → α → Prop) (wo : IsWellOrder α r), ord #α = @type α r wo :=
let ⟨r, wo⟩ := ciInf_mem fun r : { r // IsWellOrder α r } => @type α r.1 r.2
⟨r.1, r.2, wo.symm⟩
theorem ord_le_type (r : α → α → Prop) [h : IsWellOrder α r] : ord #α ≤ type r :=
ciInf_le' _ (Subtype.mk r h)
theorem ord_le {c o} : ord c ≤ o ↔ c ≤ o.card :=
inductionOn c fun α =>
Ordinal.inductionOn o fun β s _ => by
let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α
simp only [card_type]; constructor <;> intro h
· rw [e] at h
exact
let ⟨f⟩ := h
⟨f.toEmbedding⟩
· obtain ⟨f⟩ := h
have g := RelEmbedding.preimage f s
haveI := RelEmbedding.isWellOrder g
exact le_trans (ord_le_type _) g.ordinal_type_le
theorem gc_ord_card : GaloisConnection ord card := fun _ _ => ord_le
theorem lt_ord {c o} : o < ord c ↔ o.card < c :=
gc_ord_card.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem card_ord (c) : (ord c).card = c :=
c.inductionOn fun α ↦ let ⟨r, _, e⟩ := ord_eq α; e ▸ card_type r
theorem card_surjective : Function.Surjective card :=
fun c ↦ ⟨_, card_ord c⟩
/-- Galois coinsertion between `Cardinal.ord` and `Ordinal.card`. -/
def gciOrdCard : GaloisCoinsertion ord card :=
gc_ord_card.toGaloisCoinsertion fun c => c.card_ord.le
theorem ord_card_le (o : Ordinal) : o.card.ord ≤ o :=
gc_ord_card.l_u_le _
theorem lt_ord_succ_card (o : Ordinal) : o < (succ o.card).ord :=
lt_ord.2 <| lt_succ _
theorem card_le_iff {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} : o.card ≤ c ↔ o < (succ c).ord := by
rw [lt_ord, lt_succ_iff]
/--
A variation on `Cardinal.lt_ord` using `≤`: If `o` is no greater than the
initial ordinal of cardinality `c`, then its cardinal is no greater than `c`.
The converse, however, is false (for instance, `o = ω+1` and `c = ℵ₀`).
-/
lemma card_le_of_le_ord {o : Ordinal} {c : Cardinal} (ho : o ≤ c.ord) :
o.card ≤ c := by
rw [← card_ord c]; exact Ordinal.card_le_card ho
@[mono]
theorem ord_strictMono : StrictMono ord :=
gciOrdCard.strictMono_l
@[mono]
theorem ord_mono : Monotone ord :=
gc_ord_card.monotone_l
@[simp]
theorem ord_le_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ ≤ ord c₂ ↔ c₁ ≤ c₂ :=
gciOrdCard.l_le_l_iff
@[simp]
theorem ord_lt_ord {c₁ c₂} : ord c₁ < ord c₂ ↔ c₁ < c₂ :=
ord_strictMono.lt_iff_lt
@[simp]
theorem ord_zero : ord 0 = 0 :=
gc_ord_card.l_bot
@[simp]
theorem ord_nat (n : ℕ) : ord n = n :=
(ord_le.2 (card_nat n).ge).antisymm
(by
induction' n with n IH
· apply Ordinal.zero_le
· exact succ_le_of_lt (IH.trans_lt <| ord_lt_ord.2 <| Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self n)))
@[simp]
theorem ord_one : ord 1 = 1 := by simpa using ord_nat 1
@[simp]
theorem ord_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] : ord ofNat(n) = OfNat.ofNat n :=
ord_nat n
@[simp]
theorem ord_aleph0 : ord.{u} ℵ₀ = ω :=
le_antisymm (ord_le.2 le_rfl) <|
le_of_forall_lt fun o h => by
rcases Ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨o, h', rfl⟩
rw [lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt_aleph0, ← typein_enum (· < ·) h']
exact lt_aleph0_iff_fintype.2 ⟨Set.fintypeLTNat _⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_ord (c) : Ordinal.lift.{u,v} (ord c) = ord (lift.{u,v} c) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_of_forall_lt fun a ha => ?_) ?_
· rcases Ordinal.lt_lift_iff.1 ha with ⟨a, _, rfl⟩
rwa [lt_ord, ← lift_card, lift_lt, ← lt_ord, ← Ordinal.lift_lt]
· rw [ord_le, ← lift_card, card_ord]
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Ordinal/Basic.lean | 1,132 | 1,136 | theorem mk_ord_toType (c : Cardinal) : #c.ord.toType = c := by | simp
theorem card_typein_lt (r : α → α → Prop) [IsWellOrder α r] (x : α) (h : ord #α = type r) :
card (typein r x) < #α := by
rw [← lt_ord, h] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Dynamics.FixedPoints.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
/-!
# Birkhoff sums
In this file we define `birkhoffSum f g n x` to be the sum `∑ k ∈ Finset.range n, g (f^[k] x)`.
This sum (more precisely, the corresponding average `n⁻¹ • birkhoffSum f g n x`)
appears in various ergodic theorems
saying that these averages converge to the "space average" `⨍ x, g x ∂μ` in some sense.
See also `birkhoffAverage` defined in `Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Average`.
-/
open Finset Function
section AddCommMonoid
variable {α M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M]
/-- The sum of values of `g` on the first `n` points of the orbit of `x` under `f`. -/
def birkhoffSum (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) : M := ∑ k ∈ range n, g (f^[k] x)
theorem birkhoffSum_zero (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 0 x = 0 :=
sum_range_zero _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_zero' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 0 = 0 :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_zero _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_one (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (x : α) : birkhoffSum f g 1 x = g x :=
sum_range_one _
@[simp]
theorem birkhoffSum_one' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) : birkhoffSum f g 1 = g :=
funext <| birkhoffSum_one f g
theorem birkhoffSum_succ (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = birkhoffSum f g n x + g (f^[n] x) :=
sum_range_succ _ _
theorem birkhoffSum_succ' (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (n + 1) x = g x + birkhoffSum f g n (f x) :=
(sum_range_succ' _ _).trans (add_comm _ _)
theorem birkhoffSum_add (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (m n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g (m + n) x = birkhoffSum f g m x + birkhoffSum f g n (f^[m] x) := by
simp_rw [birkhoffSum, sum_range_add, add_comm m, iterate_add_apply]
theorem Function.IsFixedPt.birkhoffSum_eq {f : α → α} {x : α} (h : IsFixedPt f x) (g : α → M)
(n : ℕ) : birkhoffSum f g n x = n • g x := by
simp [birkhoffSum, (h.iterate _).eq]
theorem map_birkhoffSum {F N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [FunLike F M N] [AddMonoidHomClass F M N]
(g' : F) (f : α → α) (g : α → M) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
g' (birkhoffSum f g n x) = birkhoffSum f (g' ∘ g) n x :=
map_sum g' _ _
end AddCommMonoid
section AddCommGroup
variable {α G : Type*} [AddCommGroup G]
/-- Birkhoff sum is "almost invariant" under `f`:
the difference between `birkhoffSum f g n (f x)` and `birkhoffSum f g n x`
is equal to `g (f^[n] x) - g x`. -/
| Mathlib/Dynamics/BirkhoffSum/Basic.lean | 73 | 77 | theorem birkhoffSum_apply_sub_birkhoffSum (f : α → α) (g : α → G) (n : ℕ) (x : α) :
birkhoffSum f g n (f x) - birkhoffSum f g n x = g (f^[n] x) - g x := by | rw [← sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (birkhoffSum_succ f g n x),
← sub_eq_iff_eq_add.2 (birkhoffSum_succ' f g n x),
← sub_add, ← sub_add, sub_add_comm] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.NormalMono.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
/-!
# Every NonPreadditiveAbelian category is preadditive
In mathlib, we define an abelian category as a preadditive category with a zero object,
kernels and cokernels, products and coproducts and in which every monomorphism and epimorphism is
normal.
While virtually every interesting abelian category has a natural preadditive structure (which is why
it is included in the definition), preadditivity is not actually needed: Every category that has
all of the other properties appearing in the definition of an abelian category admits a preadditive
structure. This is the construction we carry out in this file.
The proof proceeds in roughly five steps:
1. Prove some results (for example that all equalizers exist) that would be trivial if we already
had the preadditive structure but are a bit of work without it.
2. Develop images and coimages to show that every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel.
The results of the first two steps are also useful for the "normal" development of abelian
categories, and will be used there.
3. For every object `A`, define a "subtraction" morphism `σ : A ⨯ A ⟶ A` and use it to define
subtraction on morphisms as `f - g := prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
4. Prove a small number of identities about this subtraction from the definition of `σ`.
5. From these identities, prove a large number of other identities that imply that defining
`f + g := f - (0 - g)` indeed gives an abelian group structure on morphisms such that composition
is bilinear.
The construction is non-trivial and it is quite remarkable that this abelian group structure can
be constructed purely from the existence of a few limits and colimits. Even more remarkably,
since abelian categories admit exactly one preadditive structure (see
`subsingletonPreadditiveOfHasBinaryBiproducts`), the construction manages to exactly
reconstruct any natural preadditive structure the category may have.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
section
universe v u
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- We call a category `NonPreadditiveAbelian` if it has a zero object, kernels, cokernels, binary
products and coproducts, and every monomorphism and every epimorphism is normal. -/
class NonPreadditiveAbelian extends HasZeroMorphisms C, IsNormalMonoCategory C,
IsNormalEpiCategory C where
[has_zero_object : HasZeroObject C]
[has_kernels : HasKernels C]
[has_cokernels : HasCokernels C]
[has_finite_products : HasFiniteProducts C]
[has_finite_coproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_zero_object
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_kernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_cokernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_products
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_coproducts
end
end CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [NonPreadditiveAbelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory.NonPreadditiveAbelian
section Factor
variable {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q)
/-- The map `p : P ⟶ image f` is an epimorphism -/
instance : Epi (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
let I := Abelian.image f
let p := Abelian.factorThruImage f
let i := kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
-- It will suffice to consider some g : I ⟶ R such that p ≫ g = 0 and show that g = 0.
NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
_ fun R (g : I ⟶ R) (hpg : p ≫ g = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := ker g ≫ i is the kernel of some morphism h.
let u := kernel.ι g ≫ i
haveI hu := normalMonoOfMono u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, p factors through the kernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := kernel.lift' g p hpg
have fh : f ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
f ≫ h = (p ≫ i) ≫ h := (Abelian.image.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = ((t ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i) ≫ h := ht ▸ rfl
_ = t ≫ u ≫ h := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = t ≫ 0 := hu.w ▸ rfl
_ = 0 := HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero _ _
-- h factors through the cokernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := cokernel.desc' f h fh
have hih : i ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
i ≫ h = i ≫ cokernel.π f ≫ l := hl ▸ rfl
_ = 0 ≫ l := by rw [← Category.assoc, kernel.condition]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- i factors through u = ker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalMono.lift' u i hih
have hs' : (s ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i = 𝟙 I ≫ i := by rw [Category.assoc, hs, Category.id_comp]
haveI : Epi (kernel.ι g) := epi_of_epi_fac ((cancel_mono _).1 hs')
-- ker g is an epimorphism, but ker g ≫ g = 0 = ker g ≫ 0, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_epi_comp _ (kernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruImage [Mono f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi <| Abelian.factorThruImage f
/-- The canonical morphism `i : coimage f ⟶ Q` is a monomorphism -/
instance : Mono (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
let I := Abelian.coimage f
let i := Abelian.factorThruCoimage f
let p := cokernel.π (kernel.ι f)
NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero _ fun R (g : R ⟶ I) (hgi : g ≫ i = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := p ≫ coker g is the cokernel of some morphism h.
let u := p ≫ cokernel.π g
haveI hu := normalEpiOfEpi u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, i factors through the cokernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := cokernel.desc' g i hgi
have hf : h ≫ f = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ f = h ≫ p ≫ i := (Abelian.coimage.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ t := ht ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ u ≫ t := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = 0 ≫ t := by rw [← Category.assoc, hu.w]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- h factors through the kernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := kernel.lift' f h hf
have hhp : h ≫ p = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ p = (l ≫ kernel.ι f) ≫ p := hl ▸ rfl
_ = l ≫ 0 := by rw [Category.assoc, cokernel.condition]
_ = 0 := comp_zero
-- p factors through u = coker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalEpi.desc' u p hhp
have hs' : p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ s = p ≫ 𝟙 I := by rw [← Category.assoc, hs, Category.comp_id]
haveI : Mono (cokernel.π g) := mono_of_mono_fac ((cancel_epi _).1 hs')
-- coker g is a monomorphism, but g ≫ coker g = 0 = 0 ≫ coker g, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_comp_mono _ (cokernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruCoimage [Epi f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
end Factor
section CokernelOfKernel
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, an epi is the cokernel of its kernel. More precisely:
If `f` is an epimorphism and `s` is some limit kernel cone on `f`, then `f` is a cokernel
of `Fork.ι s`. -/
def epiIsCokernelOfKernel [Epi f] (s : Fork f 0) (h : IsLimit s) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ f (KernelFork.condition s)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _
(cokernel.ofIsoComp _ _ (Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h)
(ConeMorphism.w (Limits.IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) (Abelian.coimage.fac f)
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, a mono is the kernel of its cokernel. More precisely:
If `f` is a monomorphism and `s` is some colimit cokernel cocone on `f`, then `f` is a kernel
of `Cofork.π s`. -/
def monoIsKernelOfCokernel [Mono f] (s : Cofork f 0) (h : IsColimit s) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι f (CokernelCofork.condition s)) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _
(kernel.ofCompIso _ _ (Limits.IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso h (colimit.isColimit _))
(CoconeMorphism.w (Limits.IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso h <| colimit.isColimit _).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruImage f) (Abelian.image.fac f)
end CokernelOfKernel
section
/-- The composite `A ⟶ A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (Δ A)`, where the first map is `(𝟙 A, 0)` and the second map
is the canonical projection into the cokernel. -/
abbrev r (A : C) : A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) :=
prod.lift (𝟙 A) 0 ≫ cokernel.π (diag A)
instance mono_Δ {A : C} : Mono (diag A) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
instance mono_r {A : C} : Mono (r A) := by
let hl : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (diag A) (cokernel.condition (diag A))) :=
monoIsKernelOfCokernel _ (colimit.isColimit _)
apply NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro Z x hx
have hxx : (x ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) = 0 := by
rw [Category.assoc, hx]
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hl _ hxx
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι] at hy
have hyy : y = 0 := by
erw [← Category.comp_id y, ← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), ← Category.assoc, hy,
Category.assoc, prod.lift_snd, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
rw [← hy, hyy, zero_comp, zero_comp]
instance epi_r {A : C} : Epi (r A) := by
have hlp : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ Limits.prod.snd = 0 := prod.lift_snd _ _
let hp1 : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) hlp) := by
refine Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => Fork.ι s ≫ Limits.prod.fst) ?_ ?_
· intro s
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
· intro s m h
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
convert h
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
let hp2 : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.prod.snd : A ⨯ A ⟶ A) hlp) :=
epiIsCokernelOfKernel _ hp1
apply NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
intro Z z hz
have h : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ z = 0 := by rw [← Category.assoc, hz]
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hp2 _ h
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ] at ht
have htt : t = 0 := by
rw [← Category.id_comp t]
change 𝟙 A ≫ t = 0
rw [← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), Category.assoc, ht, ← Category.assoc,
cokernel.condition, zero_comp]
apply (cancel_epi (cokernel.π (diag A))).1
rw [← ht, htt, comp_zero, comp_zero]
instance isIso_r {A : C} : IsIso (r A) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
/-- The composite `A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) ⟶ A` given by the natural projection into the cokernel
followed by the inverse of `r`. In the category of modules, using the normal kernels and
cokernels, this map is equal to the map `(a, b) ↦ a - b`, hence the name `σ` for
"subtraction". -/
abbrev σ {A : C} : A ⨯ A ⟶ A :=
cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ inv (r A)
end
@[reassoc]
theorem diag_σ {X : C} : diag X ≫ σ = 0 := by rw [cokernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_σ {X : C} : prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ = 𝟙 X := by rw [← Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 := by simp
/-- σ is a cokernel of Δ X. -/
def isColimitσ {X : C} : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (σ : X ⨯ X ⟶ X) diag_σ) :=
cokernel.cokernelIso _ σ (asIso (r X)).symm (by rw [Iso.symm_hom, asIso_inv])
/-- This is the key identity satisfied by `σ`. -/
theorem σ_comp {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : σ ≫ f = Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' isColimitσ (Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ) (by
rw [prod.diag_map_assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero])
suffices hfg : f = g by rw [← hg, Cofork.π_ofπ, hfg]
calc
f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 ≫ σ := by rw [lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by rw [lift_map_assoc]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ ≫ g := by rw [← hg, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ]
_ = g := by rw [← Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.id_comp]
section
-- We write `f - g` for `prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
/-- Subtraction of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasSub {X Y : C} : Sub (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => prod.lift f g ≫ σ⟩
attribute [local instance] hasSub
-- We write `-f` for `0 - f`.
/-- Negation of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasNeg {X Y : C} : Neg (X ⟶ Y) where
neg := fun f => 0 - f
attribute [local instance] hasNeg
-- We write `f + g` for `f - (-g)`.
/-- Addition of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasAdd {X Y : C} : Add (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => f - -g⟩
attribute [local instance] hasAdd
theorem sub_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a - b = prod.lift a b ≫ σ := rfl
theorem add_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = a - -b := rfl
theorem neg_def {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a = 0 - a := rfl
theorem sub_zero {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - 0 = a := by
rw [sub_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; rw [← Category.comp_id a]
case a.g => rw [show 0 = a ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Y) by simp]
rw [← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
theorem sub_self {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - a = 0 := by
rw [sub_def, ← Category.comp_id a, ← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero]
theorem lift_sub_lift {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift a b - prod.lift c d = prod.lift (a - c) (b - d) := by
simp only [sub_def]
ext
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst]
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd]
theorem sub_sub_sub {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) : a - c - (b - d) = a - b - (c - d) := by
rw [sub_def, ← lift_sub_lift, sub_def, Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc]; rfl
theorem neg_sub {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -a - b = -b - a := by
conv_lhs => rw [neg_def, ← sub_zero b, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, ← neg_def]
theorem neg_neg {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : - -a = a := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [← sub_self a]
rw [sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem add_comm {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = b + a := by
rw [add_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← neg_neg a]
rw [neg_def, neg_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub]
conv_lhs =>
congr
next => skip
rw [← neg_def, neg_sub]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, ← neg_def, neg_neg b, neg_def]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/NonPreadditive.lean | 362 | 367 | theorem add_neg {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + -b = a - b := by | rw [add_def, neg_neg]
theorem add_neg_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a + -a = 0 := by rw [add_neg, sub_self]
theorem neg_add_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a + a = 0 := by rw [add_comm, add_neg_cancel] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.ModEq
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Archimedean.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Periodic
import Mathlib.Data.Int.SuccPred
import Mathlib.Order.Circular
/-!
# Reducing to an interval modulo its length
This file defines operations that reduce a number (in an `Archimedean`
`LinearOrderedAddCommGroup`) to a number in a given interval, modulo the length of that
interval.
## Main definitions
* `toIcoDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIcoMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`.
* `toIocDiv hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`,
subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`.
* `toIocMod hp a b` (where `hp : 0 < p`): Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`.
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
noncomputable section
section LinearOrderedAddCommGroup
variable {α : Type*} [AddCommGroup α] [LinearOrder α] [IsOrderedAddMonoid α] [hα : Archimedean α]
{p : α} (hp : 0 < p)
{a b c : α} {n : ℤ}
section
include hp
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p)) :
toIcoDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/--
The unique integer such that this multiple of `p`, subtracted from `b`, is in `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocDiv (a b : α) : ℤ :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose
theorem sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
(existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.1
theorem toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc (h : b - n • p ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p)) :
toIocDiv hp a b = n :=
((existsUnique_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp b a).choose_spec.2 _ h).symm
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ico a (a + p)`. -/
def toIcoMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p
/-- Reduce `b` to the interval `Ioc a (a + p)`. -/
def toIocMod (a b : α) : α :=
b - toIocDiv hp a b • p
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) :=
sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
theorem toIcoMod_mem_Ico' (b : α) : toIcoMod hp 0 b ∈ Set.Ico 0 p := by
convert toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp 0 b
exact (zero_add p).symm
theorem toIocMod_mem_Ioc (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) :=
sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
theorem left_le_toIcoMod (a b : α) : a ≤ toIcoMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).1
theorem left_lt_toIocMod (a b : α) : a < toIocMod hp a b :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).1
theorem toIcoMod_lt_right (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b < a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ico.1 (toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b)).2
theorem toIocMod_le_right (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b ≤ a + p :=
(Set.mem_Ioc.1 (toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b)).2
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIcoDiv hp a b • p = toIcoMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : b - toIocDiv hp a b • p = toIocMod hp a b :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p - b = -toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, neg_sub]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b - b = -toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_sub_self (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b - b = -toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel_left, neg_smul]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : b - toIcoMod hp a b = toIcoDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem self_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : b - toIocMod hp a b = toIocDiv hp a b • p := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_sub_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIcoMod hp a b + toIcoDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIcoMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul (a b : α) : toIocMod hp a b + toIocDiv hp a b • p = b := by
rw [toIocMod, sub_add_cancel]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_sub_toIcoMod (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a b • p + toIcoMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_sub_toIocMod (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a b • p + toIocMod hp a b = b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul]
theorem toIcoMod_eq_iff : toIcoMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ico a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIcoMod_mem_Ico hp a b, toIcoDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIcoMod_add_toIcoDiv_zsmul _ _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp hc, toIcoMod]
theorem toIocMod_eq_iff : toIocMod hp a b = c ↔ c ∈ Set.Ioc a (a + p) ∧ ∃ z : ℤ, b = c + z • p := by
refine
⟨fun h =>
⟨h ▸ toIocMod_mem_Ioc hp a b, toIocDiv hp a b, h ▸ (toIocMod_add_toIocDiv_zsmul hp _ _).symm⟩,
?_⟩
simp_rw [← @sub_eq_iff_eq_add]
rintro ⟨hc, n, rfl⟩
rw [← toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp hc, toIocMod]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a a = 0 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_left (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a a = -1 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a a = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_apply_left (a : α) : toIocMod hp a a = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, -1, by simp⟩
theorem toIcoDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (a + p) = 1 :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIocDiv_apply_right (a : α) : toIocDiv hp a (a + p) = 0 :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by simp [hp]
theorem toIcoMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIcoMod hp a (a + p) = a := by
rw [toIcoMod_eq_iff hp, Set.left_mem_Ico]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 1, by simp⟩
theorem toIocMod_apply_right (a : α) : toIocMod hp a (a + p) = a + p := by
rw [toIocMod_eq_iff hp, Set.right_mem_Ioc]
exact ⟨lt_add_of_pos_right _ hp, 0, by simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + m :=
toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b + m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b + m :=
toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp <| by
simpa only [add_smul, add_sub_add_right_eq_sub] using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a + m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
refine toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc _ ?_
rw [sub_smul, ← sub_add, add_right_comm]
simpa using sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp a b
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIcoDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIcoDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIcoDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_zsmul_add (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (m • p + b) = m + toIocDiv hp a b := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, add_comm]
/-! Note we omit `toIocDiv_zsmul_add'` as `-m + toIocDiv hp a b` is not very convenient. -/
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocDiv hp a (b - m • p) = toIocDiv hp a b - m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, sub_eq_add_neg]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocDiv hp (a - m • p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + m := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_smul, toIocDiv_add_zsmul', sub_neg_eq_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b + p) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a + p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b + p) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_right' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a + p) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_add_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (p + b) = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (p + a) b = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIcoDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (p + b) = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right]
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_add_left' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (p + a) b = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
rw [add_comm, toIocDiv_add_right']
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (b - p) = toIcoDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIcoDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (a - p) b = toIcoDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIcoDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (b - p) = toIocDiv hp a b - 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul hp a b 1
@[simp]
theorem toIocDiv_sub' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (a - p) b = toIocDiv hp a b + 1 := by
simpa only [one_zsmul] using toIocDiv_sub_zsmul' hp a b 1
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp a (b - c) = toIcoDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIcoDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ico
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ico_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp (a + c) b
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp a (b - c) = toIocDiv hp (a + c) b := by
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
rw [← sub_right_comm, Set.sub_mem_Ioc_iff_left, add_right_comm]
exact sub_toIocDiv_zsmul_mem_Ioc hp (a + c) b
theorem toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIcoDiv hp (a - c) b = toIcoDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIcoDiv_sub_eq_toIcoDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add' (a b c : α) :
toIocDiv hp (a - c) b = toIocDiv hp a (b + c) := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIocDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
suffices toIcoDiv hp a (-b) = -toIocDiv hp (-(a + p)) b by
rwa [neg_add, ← sub_eq_add_neg, toIocDiv_sub_eq_toIocDiv_add', toIocDiv_add_right] at this
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, eq_comm]
apply toIocDiv_eq_of_sub_zsmul_mem_Ioc
obtain ⟨hc, ho⟩ := sub_toIcoDiv_zsmul_mem_Ico hp a (-b)
rw [← neg_lt_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at ho
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, neg_sub' (-b), neg_neg, ← neg_smul] at hc
refine ⟨ho, hc.trans_eq ?_⟩
rw [neg_add, neg_add_cancel_right]
theorem toIcoDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIcoDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIocDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIcoDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
theorem toIocDiv_neg (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp a (-b) = -(toIcoDiv hp (-a) b + 1) := by
rw [← neg_neg b, toIcoDiv_neg, neg_neg, neg_neg, neg_add', neg_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]
theorem toIocDiv_neg' (a b : α) : toIocDiv hp (-a) b = -(toIcoDiv hp a (-b) + 1) := by
simpa only [neg_neg] using toIocDiv_neg hp (-a) (-b)
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIcoMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIcoMod hp a b := by
rw [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul, toIcoMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
theorem toIcoMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIcoMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIcoMod hp a b + m • p := by
simp only [toIcoMod, toIcoDiv_add_zsmul', sub_smul, sub_add]
@[simp]
theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul (a b : α) (m : ℤ) : toIocMod hp a (b + m • p) = toIocMod hp a b := by
rw [toIocMod, toIocDiv_add_zsmul, toIocMod, add_smul]
abel
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/ToIntervalMod.lean | 354 | 355 | theorem toIocMod_add_zsmul' (a b : α) (m : ℤ) :
toIocMod hp (a + m • p) b = toIocMod hp a b + m • p := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Bases
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.CountableInter
import Mathlib.Topology.Compactness.SigmaCompact
/-!
# Lindelöf sets and Lindelöf spaces
## Main definitions
We define the following properties for sets in a topological space:
* `IsLindelof s`: Two definitions are possible here. The more standard definition is that
every open cover that contains `s` contains a countable subcover. We choose for the equivalent
definition where we require that every nontrivial filter on `s` with the countable intersection
property has a clusterpoint. Equivalence is established in `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`.
* `LindelofSpace X`: `X` is Lindelöf if it is Lindelöf as a set.
* `NonLindelofSpace`: a space that is not a Lindëlof space, e.g. the Long Line.
## Main results
* `isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`: A set is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a
countable subcover.
## Implementation details
* This API is mainly based on the API for IsCompact and follows notation and style as much
as possible.
-/
open Set Filter Topology TopologicalSpace
universe u v
variable {X : Type u} {Y : Type v} {ι : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace X] [TopologicalSpace Y] {s t : Set X}
section Lindelof
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if every nontrivial filter `f` with the countable intersection
property that contains `s`, has a clusterpoint in `s`. The filter-free definition is given by
`isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover`. -/
def IsLindelof (s : Set X) :=
∀ ⦃f⦄ [NeBot f] [CountableInterFilter f], f ≤ 𝓟 s → ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if it belongs to each filter `𝓝 x ⊓ f`, `x ∈ s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f]
(hf : ∀ x ∈ s, sᶜ ∈ 𝓝 x ⊓ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
contrapose! hf
simp only [not_mem_iff_inf_principal_compl, compl_compl, inf_assoc] at hf ⊢
exact hs inf_le_right
/-- The complement to a Lindelöf set belongs to a filter `f` with the countable intersection
property if each `x ∈ s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `tᶜ` belongs to `f`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (hs : IsLindelof s) {f : Filter X}
[CountableInterFilter f] (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, tᶜ ∈ f) : sᶜ ∈ f := by
refine hs.compl_mem_sets fun x hx ↦ ?_
rw [← disjoint_principal_right, disjoint_right_comm, (basis_sets _).disjoint_iff_left]
exact hf x hx
/-- If `p : Set X → Prop` is stable under restriction and union, and each point `x`
of a Lindelöf set `s` has a neighborhood `t` within `s` such that `p t`, then `p s` holds. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem IsLindelof.induction_on (hs : IsLindelof s) {p : Set X → Prop}
(hmono : ∀ ⦃s t⦄, s ⊆ t → p t → p s)
(hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable → (∀ s ∈ S, p s) → p (⋃₀ S))
(hnhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, p t) : p s := by
let f : Filter X := ofCountableUnion p hcountable_union (fun t ht _ hsub ↦ hmono hsub ht)
have : sᶜ ∈ f := hs.compl_mem_sets_of_nhdsWithin (by simpa [f] using hnhds)
rwa [← compl_compl s]
/-- The intersection of a Lindelöf set and a closed set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_right (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) := by
intro f hnf _ hstf
rw [← inf_principal, le_inf_iff] at hstf
obtain ⟨x, hsx, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f := hs hstf.1
have hxt : x ∈ t := ht.mem_of_nhdsWithin_neBot <| hx.mono hstf.2
exact ⟨x, ⟨hsx, hxt⟩, hx⟩
/-- The intersection of a closed set and a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_left (ht : IsLindelof t) (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLindelof (s ∩ t) :=
inter_comm t s ▸ ht.inter_right hs
/-- The set difference of a Lindelöf set and an open set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.diff (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsOpen t) : IsLindelof (s \ t) :=
hs.inter_right (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr ht)
/-- A closed subset of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.of_isClosed_subset (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsClosed t) (h : t ⊆ s) :
IsLindelof t := inter_eq_self_of_subset_right h ▸ hs.inter_right ht
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image_of_continuousOn {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : ContinuousOn f s) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := by
intro l lne _ ls
have : NeBot (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
comap_inf_principal_neBot_of_image_mem lne (le_principal_iff.1 ls)
obtain ⟨x, hxs, hx⟩ : ∃ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x (l.comap f ⊓ 𝓟 s) := @hs _ this _ inf_le_right
haveI := hx.neBot
use f x, mem_image_of_mem f hxs
have : Tendsto f (𝓝 x ⊓ (comap f l ⊓ 𝓟 s)) (𝓝 (f x) ⊓ l) := by
convert (hf x hxs).inf (@tendsto_comap _ _ f l) using 1
rw [nhdsWithin]
ac_rfl
exact this.neBot
/-- A continuous image of a Lindelöf set is a Lindelöf set within the codomain. -/
theorem IsLindelof.image {f : X → Y} (hs : IsLindelof s) (hf : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (f '' s) := hs.image_of_continuousOn hf.continuousOn
/-- A filter with the countable intersection property that is finer than the principal filter on
a Lindelöf set `s` contains any open set that contains all clusterpoints of `s`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.adherence_nhdset {f : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter f] (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hf₂ : f ≤ 𝓟 s) (ht₁ : IsOpen t) (ht₂ : ∀ x ∈ s, ClusterPt x f → x ∈ t) : t ∈ f :=
(eq_or_neBot _).casesOn mem_of_eq_bot fun _ ↦
let ⟨x, hx, hfx⟩ := @hs (f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ) _ _ <| inf_le_of_left_le hf₂
have : x ∈ t := ht₂ x hx hfx.of_inf_left
have : tᶜ ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x := inter_mem_nhdsWithin _ (ht₁.mem_nhds this)
have A : 𝓝[tᶜ] x = ⊥ := empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| compl_inter_self t ▸ this
have : 𝓝[tᶜ] x ≠ ⊥ := hfx.of_inf_right.ne
absurd A this
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X)
(hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
have hmono : ∀ ⦃s t : Set X⦄, s ⊆ t → (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i)
→ (∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro _ _ hst ⟨r, ⟨hrcountable, hsub⟩⟩
exact ⟨r, hrcountable, Subset.trans hst hsub⟩
have hcountable_union : ∀ (S : Set (Set X)), S.Countable
→ (∀ s ∈ S, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i))
→ ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (⋃₀ S ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro S hS hsr
choose! r hr using hsr
refine ⟨⋃ s ∈ S, r s, hS.biUnion_iff.mpr (fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1), ?_⟩
refine sUnion_subset ?h.right.h
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
exact fun i is x hx ↦ mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
have h_nhds : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, ∃ r : Set ι, r.Countable ∧ (t ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ r, U i) := by
intro x hx
let ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 (hsU hx)
refine ⟨U i, mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds ((hUo i).mem_nhds hi), {i}, by simp, ?_⟩
simp only [mem_singleton_iff, iUnion_iUnion_eq_left]
exact Subset.refl _
exact hs.induction_on hmono hcountable_union h_nhds
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover' (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ∀ x ∈ s, Set X)
(hU : ∀ x (hx : x ∈ s), U x ‹x ∈ s› ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set s, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U (x : s) x.2 := by
have := hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun x : s ↦ interior (U x x.2)) (fun _ ↦ isOpen_interior)
fun x hx ↦
mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, mem_interior_iff_mem_nhds.2 <| hU _ _⟩
rcases this with ⟨r, ⟨hr, hs⟩⟩
use r, hr
apply Subset.trans hs
apply iUnion₂_subset
intro i hi
apply Subset.trans interior_subset
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset i (subset_iUnion_of_subset hi (Subset.refl _))
theorem IsLindelof.elim_nhds_subcover (hs : IsLindelof s) (U : X → Set X)
(hU : ∀ x ∈ s, U x ∈ 𝓝 x) :
∃ t : Set X, t.Countable ∧ (∀ x ∈ t, x ∈ s) ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ x ∈ t, U x := by
let ⟨t, ⟨htc, htsub⟩⟩ := hs.elim_nhds_subcover' (fun x _ ↦ U x) hU
refine ⟨↑t, Countable.image htc Subtype.val, ?_⟩
constructor
· intro _
simp only [mem_image, Subtype.exists, exists_and_right, exists_eq_right, forall_exists_index]
tauto
· have : ⋃ x ∈ t, U ↑x = ⋃ x ∈ Subtype.val '' t, U x := biUnion_image.symm
rwa [← this]
/-- For every nonempty open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a subcover indexed by ℕ. -/
theorem IsLindelof.indexed_countable_subcover {ι : Type v} [Nonempty ι]
(hs : IsLindelof s) (U : ι → Set X) (hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) (hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) :
∃ f : ℕ → ι, s ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n) := by
obtain ⟨c, ⟨c_count, c_cov⟩⟩ := hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU
rcases c.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | c_nonempty
· simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, iUnion_of_empty, iUnion_empty] at c_cov
simp only [subset_eq_empty c_cov rfl, empty_subset, exists_const]
obtain ⟨f, f_surj⟩ := (Set.countable_iff_exists_surjective c_nonempty).mp c_count
refine ⟨fun x ↦ f x, c_cov.trans <| iUnion₂_subset_iff.mpr (?_ : ∀ i ∈ c, U i ⊆ ⋃ n, U (f n))⟩
intro x hx
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := f_surj ⟨x, hx⟩
exact subset_iUnion_of_subset n <| subset_of_eq (by rw [hn])
/-- The neighborhood filter of a Lindelöf set is disjoint with a filter `l` with the countable
intersection property if and only if the neighborhood filter of each point of this set
is disjoint with `l`. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_left {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) :
Disjoint (𝓝ˢ s) l ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint (𝓝 x) l := by
refine ⟨fun h x hx ↦ h.mono_left <| nhds_le_nhdsSet hx, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
choose! U hxU hUl using fun x hx ↦ (nhds_basis_opens x).disjoint_iff_left.1 (H x hx)
choose hxU hUo using hxU
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover U fun x hx ↦ (hUo x hx).mem_nhds (hxU x hx) with ⟨t, htc, hts, hst⟩
refine (hasBasis_nhdsSet _).disjoint_iff_left.2
⟨⋃ x ∈ t, U x, ⟨isOpen_biUnion fun x hx ↦ hUo x (hts x hx), hst⟩, ?_⟩
rw [compl_iUnion₂]
exact (countable_bInter_mem htc).mpr (fun i hi ↦ hUl _ (hts _ hi))
/-- A filter `l` with the countable intersection property is disjoint with the neighborhood
filter of a Lindelöf set if and only if it is disjoint with the neighborhood filter of each point
of this set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.disjoint_nhdsSet_right {l : Filter X} [CountableInterFilter l]
(hs : IsLindelof s) : Disjoint l (𝓝ˢ s) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, Disjoint l (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [disjoint_comm] using hs.disjoint_nhdsSet_left
/-- For every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids a Lindelö set,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids this Lindelöf set. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subfamily_closed {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(t : ι → Set X) (htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅) :
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ := by
let U := tᶜ
have hUo : ∀ i, IsOpen (U i) := by simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, isOpen_compl_iff]; exact htc
have hsU : s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i := by
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply]
rw [← compl_iInter]
apply disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset.mp
simp only [compl_iInter, compl_iUnion, compl_compl]
apply Disjoint.symm
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover U hUo hsU with ⟨u, ⟨hucount, husub⟩⟩
use u, hucount
rw [← disjoint_compl_left_iff_subset] at husub
simp only [U, Pi.compl_apply, compl_iUnion, compl_compl] at husub
exact disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mp (Disjoint.symm husub)
/-- To show that a Lindelöf set intersects the intersection of a family of closed sets,
it is sufficient to show that it intersects every countable subfamily. -/
theorem IsLindelof.inter_iInter_nonempty {ι : Type v} (hs : IsLindelof s) (t : ι → Set X)
(htc : ∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) (hst : ∀ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i).Nonempty) :
(s ∩ ⋂ i, t i).Nonempty := by
contrapose! hst
rcases hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed t htc hst with ⟨u, ⟨_, husub⟩⟩
exact ⟨u, fun _ ↦ husub⟩
/-- For every open cover of a Lindelöf set, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem IsLindelof.elim_countable_subcover_image {b : Set ι} {c : ι → Set X} (hs : IsLindelof s)
(hc₁ : ∀ i ∈ b, IsOpen (c i)) (hc₂ : s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b, c i) :
∃ b', b' ⊆ b ∧ Set.Countable b' ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ b', c i := by
simp only [Subtype.forall', biUnion_eq_iUnion] at hc₁ hc₂
rcases hs.elim_countable_subcover (fun i ↦ c i : b → Set X) hc₁ hc₂ with ⟨d, hd⟩
refine ⟨Subtype.val '' d, by simp, Countable.image hd.1 Subtype.val, ?_⟩
rw [biUnion_image]
exact hd.2
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
(h : ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) →
∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i) :
IsLindelof s := fun f hf hfs ↦ by
contrapose! h
simp only [ClusterPt, not_neBot, ← disjoint_iff, SetCoe.forall',
(nhds_basis_opens _).disjoint_iff_left] at h
choose fsub U hU hUf using h
refine ⟨s, U, fun x ↦ (hU x).2, fun x hx ↦ mem_iUnion.2 ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, (hU _).1 ⟩, ?_⟩
intro t ht h
have uinf := f.sets_of_superset (le_principal_iff.1 fsub) h
have uninf : ⋂ i ∈ t, (U i)ᶜ ∈ f := (countable_bInter_mem ht).mpr (fun _ _ ↦ hUf _)
rw [← compl_iUnion₂] at uninf
have uninf := compl_not_mem uninf
simp only [compl_compl] at uninf
contradiction
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed
(h :
∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X), (∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅ →
∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅) :
IsLindelof s :=
isLindelof_of_countable_subcover fun U hUo hsU ↦ by
rw [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion, disjoint_iff] at hsU
rcases h (fun i ↦ (U i)ᶜ) (fun i ↦ (hUo _).isClosed_compl) hsU with ⟨t, ht⟩
refine ⟨t, ?_⟩
rwa [← disjoint_compl_right_iff_subset, compl_iUnion₂, disjoint_iff]
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every open cover of `s`, there exists a countable subcover. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subcover :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (U : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsOpen (U i)) → (s ⊆ ⋃ i, U i) → ∃ t : Set ι, t.Countable ∧ s ⊆ ⋃ i ∈ t, U i :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subcover, isLindelof_of_countable_subcover⟩
/-- A set `s` is Lindelöf if and only if
for every family of closed sets whose intersection avoids `s`,
there exists a countable subfamily whose intersection avoids `s`. -/
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable_subfamily_closed :
IsLindelof s ↔ ∀ {ι : Type u} (t : ι → Set X),
(∀ i, IsClosed (t i)) → (s ∩ ⋂ i, t i) = ∅
→ ∃ u : Set ι, u.Countable ∧ (s ∩ ⋂ i ∈ u, t i) = ∅ :=
⟨fun hs ↦ hs.elim_countable_subfamily_closed, isLindelof_of_countable_subfamily_closed⟩
/-- The empty set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_empty : IsLindelof (∅ : Set X) := fun _f hnf _ hsf ↦
Not.elim hnf.ne <| empty_mem_iff_bot.1 <| le_principal_iff.1 hsf
/-- A singleton set is a Lindelof set. -/
@[simp]
theorem isLindelof_singleton {x : X} : IsLindelof ({x} : Set X) := fun _ hf _ hfa ↦
⟨x, rfl, ClusterPt.of_le_nhds'
(hfa.trans <| by simpa only [principal_singleton] using pure_le_nhds x) hf⟩
theorem Set.Subsingleton.isLindelof (hs : s.Subsingleton) : IsLindelof s :=
Subsingleton.induction_on hs isLindelof_empty fun _ ↦ isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Countable)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
apply isLindelof_of_countable_subcover
intro i U hU hUcover
have hiU : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ⊆ ⋃ i, U i :=
fun _ is ↦ _root_.subset_trans (subset_biUnion_of_mem is) hUcover
have iSets := fun i is ↦ (hf i is).elim_countable_subcover U hU (hiU i is)
choose! r hr using iSets
use ⋃ i ∈ s, r i
constructor
· refine (Countable.biUnion_iff hs).mpr ?h.left.a
exact fun s hs ↦ (hr s hs).1
· refine iUnion₂_subset ?h.right.h
intro i is
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop, iUnion_exists, biUnion_and']
intro x hx
exact mem_biUnion is ((hr i is).2 hx)
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_biUnion {s : Set ι} {f : ι → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) : IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
Set.Countable.isLindelof_biUnion (countable hs) hf
theorem Finset.isLindelof_biUnion (s : Finset ι) {f : ι → Set X} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isLindelof_biUnion hf
theorem isLindelof_accumulate {K : ℕ → Set X} (hK : ∀ n, IsLindelof (K n)) (n : ℕ) :
IsLindelof (Accumulate K n) :=
(finite_le_nat n).isLindelof_biUnion fun k _ => hK k
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Countable)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof_sUnion {S : Set (Set X)} (hf : S.Finite)
(hc : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLindelof s) : IsLindelof (⋃₀ S) := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion]; exact hf.isLindelof_biUnion hc
theorem isLindelof_iUnion {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Set X} [Countable ι] (h : ∀ i, IsLindelof (f i)) :
IsLindelof (⋃ i, f i) := (countable_range f).isLindelof_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem Set.Countable.isLindelof (hs : s.Countable) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem Set.Finite.isLindelof (hs : s.Finite) : IsLindelof s :=
biUnion_of_singleton s ▸ hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun _ _ => isLindelof_singleton
theorem IsLindelof.countable_of_discrete [DiscreteTopology X] (hs : IsLindelof s) :
s.Countable := by
have : ∀ x : X, ({x} : Set X) ∈ 𝓝 x := by simp [nhds_discrete]
rcases hs.elim_nhds_subcover (fun x => {x}) fun x _ => this x with ⟨t, ht, _, hssubt⟩
rw [biUnion_of_singleton] at hssubt
exact ht.mono hssubt
theorem isLindelof_iff_countable [DiscreteTopology X] : IsLindelof s ↔ s.Countable :=
⟨fun h => h.countable_of_discrete, fun h => h.isLindelof⟩
theorem IsLindelof.union (hs : IsLindelof s) (ht : IsLindelof t) : IsLindelof (s ∪ t) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isLindelof_iUnion fun b => by cases b <;> assumption
protected theorem IsLindelof.insert (hs : IsLindelof s) (a) : IsLindelof (insert a s) :=
isLindelof_singleton.union hs
/-- If `X` has a basis consisting of compact opens, then an open set in `X` is compact open iff
it is a finite union of some elements in the basis -/
theorem isLindelof_open_iff_eq_countable_iUnion_of_isTopologicalBasis (b : ι → Set X)
(hb : IsTopologicalBasis (Set.range b)) (hb' : ∀ i, IsLindelof (b i)) (U : Set X) :
IsLindelof U ∧ IsOpen U ↔ ∃ s : Set ι, s.Countable ∧ U = ⋃ i ∈ s, b i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨Y, f, rfl, hf⟩ := hb.open_eq_iUnion h₂
choose f' hf' using hf
have : b ∘ f' = f := funext hf'
subst this
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ :=
h₁.elim_countable_subcover (b ∘ f') (fun i => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)) Subset.rfl
refine ⟨t.image f', Countable.image (ht.1) f', le_antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· refine Set.Subset.trans ht.2 ?_
simp only [Set.iUnion_subset_iff]
intro i hi
rw [← Set.iUnion_subtype (fun x : ι => x ∈ t.image f') fun i => b i.1]
exact Set.subset_iUnion (fun i : t.image f' => b i) ⟨_, mem_image_of_mem _ hi⟩
· apply Set.iUnion₂_subset
rintro i hi
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ := (mem_image ..).mp hi
exact Set.subset_iUnion (b ∘ f') j
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
constructor
· exact hs.isLindelof_biUnion fun i _ => hb' i
· exact isOpen_biUnion fun i _ => hb.isOpen (Set.mem_range_self _)
/-- `Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets. -/
def Filter.coLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
--`Filter.coLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to Lindelöf sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
theorem hasBasis_coLindelof : (coLindelof X).HasBasis IsLindelof compl :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun s hs t ht =>
⟨s ∪ t, hs.union ht, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩)
⟨∅, isLindelof_empty⟩
theorem mem_coLindelof : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ tᶜ ⊆ s :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_iff
theorem mem_coLindelof' : s ∈ coLindelof X ↔ ∃ t, IsLindelof t ∧ sᶜ ⊆ t :=
mem_coLindelof.trans <| exists_congr fun _ => and_congr_right fun _ => compl_subset_comm
theorem _root_.IsLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof (hs : IsLindelof s) : sᶜ ∈ coLindelof X :=
hasBasis_coLindelof.mem_of_mem hs
theorem coLindelof_le_cofinite : coLindelof X ≤ cofinite := fun s hs =>
compl_compl s ▸ hs.isLindelof.compl_mem_coLindelof
theorem Tendsto.isLindelof_insert_range_of_coLindelof {f : X → Y} {y}
(hf : Tendsto f (coLindelof X) (𝓝 y)) (hfc : Continuous f) :
IsLindelof (insert y (range f)) := by
intro l hne _ hle
by_cases hy : ClusterPt y l
· exact ⟨y, Or.inl rfl, hy⟩
simp only [clusterPt_iff_nonempty, not_forall, ← not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, not_not] at hy
rcases hy with ⟨s, hsy, t, htl, hd⟩
rcases mem_coLindelof.1 (hf hsy) with ⟨K, hKc, hKs⟩
have : f '' K ∈ l := by
filter_upwards [htl, le_principal_iff.1 hle] with y hyt hyf
rcases hyf with (rfl | ⟨x, rfl⟩)
exacts [(hd.le_bot ⟨mem_of_mem_nhds hsy, hyt⟩).elim,
mem_image_of_mem _ (not_not.1 fun hxK => hd.le_bot ⟨hKs hxK, hyt⟩)]
rcases hKc.image hfc (le_principal_iff.2 this) with ⟨y, hy, hyl⟩
exact ⟨y, Or.inr <| image_subset_range _ _ hy, hyl⟩
/-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets. -/
def Filter.coclosedLindelof (X : Type*) [TopologicalSpace X] : Filter X :=
-- `Filter.coclosedLindelof` is the filter generated by complements to closed Lindelof sets.
⨅ (s : Set X) (_ : IsClosed s) (_ : IsLindelof s), 𝓟 sᶜ
| Mathlib/Topology/Compactness/Lindelof.lean | 454 | 460 | theorem hasBasis_coclosedLindelof :
(Filter.coclosedLindelof X).HasBasis (fun s => IsClosed s ∧ IsLindelof s) compl := by | simp only [Filter.coclosedLindelof, iInf_and']
refine hasBasis_biInf_principal' ?_ ⟨∅, isClosed_empty, isLindelof_empty⟩
rintro s ⟨hs₁, hs₂⟩ t ⟨ht₁, ht₂⟩
exact ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨⟨hs₁.union ht₁, hs₂.union ht₂⟩, compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_left,
compl_subset_compl.2 subset_union_right⟩⟩ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Moritz Doll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.EuclideanDomain.Field
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Module.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.Pow
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.IteratedDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.MeanValue
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.Deriv.MeanValue
/-!
# Taylor's theorem
This file defines the Taylor polynomial of a real function `f : ℝ → E`,
where `E` is a normed vector space over `ℝ` and proves Taylor's theorem,
which states that if `f` is sufficiently smooth, then
`f` can be approximated by the Taylor polynomial up to an explicit error term.
## Main definitions
* `taylorCoeffWithin`: the Taylor coefficient using `iteratedDerivWithin`
* `taylorWithin`: the Taylor polynomial using `iteratedDerivWithin`
## Main statements
* `taylor_tendsto`: Taylor's theorem as a limit
* `taylor_isLittleO`: Taylor's theorem using little-o notation
* `taylor_mean_remainder`: Taylor's theorem with the general form of the remainder term
* `taylor_mean_remainder_lagrange`: Taylor's theorem with the Lagrange remainder
* `taylor_mean_remainder_cauchy`: Taylor's theorem with the Cauchy remainder
* `exists_taylor_mean_remainder_bound`: Taylor's theorem for vector valued functions with a
polynomial bound on the remainder
## TODO
* the integral form of the remainder
* Generalization to higher dimensions
## Tags
Taylor polynomial, Taylor's theorem
-/
open scoped Interval Topology Nat
open Set
variable {𝕜 E F : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
/-- The `k`th coefficient of the Taylor polynomial. -/
noncomputable def taylorCoeffWithin (f : ℝ → E) (k : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : E :=
(k ! : ℝ)⁻¹ • iteratedDerivWithin k f s x₀
/-- The Taylor polynomial with derivatives inside of a set `s`.
The Taylor polynomial is given by
$$∑_{k=0}^n \frac{(x - x₀)^k}{k!} f^{(k)}(x₀),$$
where $f^{(k)}(x₀)$ denotes the iterated derivative in the set `s`. -/
noncomputable def taylorWithin (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) : PolynomialModule ℝ E :=
(Finset.range (n + 1)).sum fun k =>
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ k (taylorCoeffWithin f k s x₀))
/-- The Taylor polynomial with derivatives inside of a set `s` considered as a function `ℝ → E` -/
noncomputable def taylorWithinEval (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ x : ℝ) : E :=
PolynomialModule.eval x (taylorWithin f n s x₀)
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/Taylor.lean | 74 | 79 | theorem taylorWithin_succ (f : ℝ → E) (n : ℕ) (s : Set ℝ) (x₀ : ℝ) :
taylorWithin f (n + 1) s x₀ = taylorWithin f n s x₀ +
PolynomialModule.comp (Polynomial.X - Polynomial.C x₀)
(PolynomialModule.single ℝ (n + 1) (taylorCoeffWithin f (n + 1) s x₀)) := by | dsimp only [taylorWithin]
rw [Finset.sum_range_succ] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Johan Commelin. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Finprod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.ConjFinite
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Subgroup.Center
/-!
# Class Equation
This file establishes the class equation for finite groups.
## Main statements
* `Group.card_center_add_sum_card_noncenter_eq_card`: The **class equation** for finite groups.
The cardinality of a group is equal to the size of its center plus the sum of the size of all its
nontrivial conjugacy classes. Also `Group.nat_card_center_add_sum_card_noncenter_eq_card`.
-/
open MulAction ConjClasses
variable (G : Type*) [Group G]
/-- Conjugacy classes form a partition of G, stated in terms of cardinality. -/
theorem sum_conjClasses_card_eq_card [Fintype <| ConjClasses G] [Fintype G]
[∀ x : ConjClasses G, Fintype x.carrier] :
∑ x : ConjClasses G, x.carrier.toFinset.card = Fintype.card G := by
suffices (Σ x : ConjClasses G, x.carrier) ≃ G by simpa using (Fintype.card_congr this)
simpa [carrier_eq_preimage_mk] using Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv ConjClasses.mk
/-- Conjugacy classes form a partition of G, stated in terms of cardinality. -/
theorem Group.sum_card_conj_classes_eq_card [Finite G] :
∑ᶠ x : ConjClasses G, x.carrier.ncard = Nat.card G := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype G
rw [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, ← sum_conjClasses_card_eq_card, finsum_eq_sum_of_fintype]
simp [Set.ncard_eq_toFinset_card']
/-- The **class equation** for finite groups. The cardinality of a group is equal to the size
of its center plus the sum of the size of all its nontrivial conjugacy classes. -/
theorem Group.nat_card_center_add_sum_card_noncenter_eq_card [Finite G] :
Nat.card (Subgroup.center G) + ∑ᶠ x ∈ noncenter G, Nat.card x.carrier = Nat.card G := by
classical
cases nonempty_fintype G
rw [@Nat.card_eq_fintype_card G, ← sum_conjClasses_card_eq_card, ←
Finset.sum_sdiff (ConjClasses.noncenter G).toFinset.subset_univ]
simp only [Nat.card_eq_fintype_card, Set.toFinset_card]
congr 1
swap
· convert finsum_cond_eq_sum_of_cond_iff _ _
simp [Set.mem_toFinset]
calc
Fintype.card (Subgroup.center G) = Fintype.card ((noncenter G)ᶜ : Set _) :=
Fintype.card_congr ((mk_bijOn G).equiv _)
_ = Finset.card (Finset.univ \ (noncenter G).toFinset) := by
rw [← Set.toFinset_card, Set.toFinset_compl, Finset.compl_eq_univ_sdiff]
_ = _ := ?_
rw [Finset.card_eq_sum_ones]
refine Finset.sum_congr rfl ?_
rintro ⟨g⟩ hg
simp only [noncenter, Set.not_subsingleton_iff, Set.toFinset_setOf, Finset.mem_univ, true_and,
forall_true_left, Finset.mem_sdiff, Finset.mem_filter, Set.not_nontrivial_iff] at hg
rw [eq_comm, ← Set.toFinset_card, Finset.card_eq_one]
exact ⟨g, Finset.coe_injective <| by simpa using hg.eq_singleton_of_mem mem_carrier_mk⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/ClassEquation.lean | 72 | 81 | theorem Group.card_center_add_sum_card_noncenter_eq_card (G) [Group G]
[∀ x : ConjClasses G, Fintype x.carrier] [Fintype G] [Fintype <| Subgroup.center G]
[Fintype <| noncenter G] : Fintype.card (Subgroup.center G) +
∑ x ∈ (noncenter G).toFinset, x.carrier.toFinset.card = Fintype.card G := by | convert Group.nat_card_center_add_sum_card_noncenter_eq_card G using 2
· simp
· rw [← finsum_set_coe_eq_finsum_mem (noncenter G), finsum_eq_sum_of_fintype,
← Finset.sum_set_coe]
simp
· simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Field.Basic
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Order
import Mathlib.Order.Partition.Finpartition
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Edge density
This file defines the number and density of edges of a relation/graph.
## Main declarations
Between two finsets of vertices,
* `Rel.interedges`: Finset of edges of a relation.
* `Rel.edgeDensity`: Edge density of a relation.
* `SimpleGraph.interedges`: Finset of edges of a graph.
* `SimpleGraph.edgeDensity`: Edge density of a graph.
-/
open Finset
variable {𝕜 ι κ α β : Type*}
/-! ### Density of a relation -/
namespace Rel
section Asymmetric
variable [Field 𝕜] [LinearOrder 𝕜] [IsStrictOrderedRing 𝕜]
(r : α → β → Prop) [∀ a, DecidablePred (r a)] {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α}
{t t₁ t₂ : Finset β} {a : α} {b : β} {δ : 𝕜}
/-- Finset of edges of a relation between two finsets of vertices. -/
def interedges (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : Finset (α × β) := {e ∈ s ×ˢ t | r e.1 e.2}
/-- Edge density of a relation between two finsets of vertices. -/
def edgeDensity (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : ℚ := #(interedges r s t) / (#s * #t)
variable {r}
theorem mem_interedges_iff {x : α × β} : x ∈ interedges r s t ↔ x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t ∧ r x.1 x.2 := by
rw [interedges, mem_filter, Finset.mem_product, and_assoc]
theorem mk_mem_interedges_iff : (a, b) ∈ interedges r s t ↔ a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t ∧ r a b :=
mem_interedges_iff
@[simp]
theorem interedges_empty_left (t : Finset β) : interedges r ∅ t = ∅ := by
rw [interedges, Finset.empty_product, filter_empty]
theorem interedges_mono (hs : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (ht : t₂ ⊆ t₁) : interedges r s₂ t₂ ⊆ interedges r s₁ t₁ :=
fun x ↦ by
simp_rw [mem_interedges_iff]
exact fun h ↦ ⟨hs h.1, ht h.2.1, h.2.2⟩
variable (r)
theorem card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(interedges r s t) + #(interedges (fun x y ↦ ¬r x y) s t) = #s * #t := by
classical
rw [← card_product, interedges, interedges, ← card_union_of_disjoint, filter_union_filter_neg_eq]
exact disjoint_filter.2 fun _ _ ↦ Classical.not_not.2
theorem interedges_disjoint_left {s s' : Finset α} (hs : Disjoint s s') (t : Finset β) :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s' t) := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at hs ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact hs hx.1 hy.1
theorem interedges_disjoint_right (s : Finset α) {t t' : Finset β} (ht : Disjoint t t') :
Disjoint (interedges r s t) (interedges r s t') := by
rw [Finset.disjoint_left] at ht ⊢
intro _ hx hy
rw [mem_interedges_iff] at hx hy
exact ht hx.2.1 hy.2.1
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α] [DecidableEq β]
lemma interedges_eq_biUnion :
interedges r s t =
s.biUnion fun x ↦ {y ∈ t | r x y}.map ⟨(x, ·), Prod.mk_right_injective x⟩ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩; simp [mem_interedges_iff]
theorem interedges_biUnion_left (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset β) (f : ι → Finset α) :
interedges r (s.biUnion f) t = s.biUnion fun a ↦ interedges r (f a) t := by
ext
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_interedges_iff, exists_and_right, ← and_assoc]
theorem interedges_biUnion_right (s : Finset α) (t : Finset ι) (f : ι → Finset β) :
interedges r s (t.biUnion f) = t.biUnion fun b ↦ interedges r s (f b) := by
ext a
simp only [mem_interedges_iff, mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨fun ⟨x₁, ⟨x₂, x₃, x₄⟩, x₅⟩ ↦ ⟨x₂, x₃, x₁, x₄, x₅⟩,
fun ⟨x₂, x₃, x₁, x₄, x₅⟩ ↦ ⟨x₁, ⟨x₂, x₃, x₄⟩, x₅⟩⟩
theorem interedges_biUnion (s : Finset ι) (t : Finset κ) (f : ι → Finset α) (g : κ → Finset β) :
interedges r (s.biUnion f) (t.biUnion g) =
(s ×ˢ t).biUnion fun ab ↦ interedges r (f ab.1) (g ab.2) := by
simp_rw [product_biUnion, interedges_biUnion_left, interedges_biUnion_right]
end DecidableEq
theorem card_interedges_le_mul (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) :
#(interedges r s t) ≤ #s * #t :=
(card_filter_le _ _).trans (card_product _ _).le
theorem edgeDensity_nonneg (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : 0 ≤ edgeDensity r s t := by
apply div_nonneg <;> exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
theorem edgeDensity_le_one (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) : edgeDensity r s t ≤ 1 := by
apply div_le_one_of_le₀
· exact mod_cast card_interedges_le_mul r s t
· exact mod_cast Nat.zero_le _
theorem edgeDensity_add_edgeDensity_compl (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : t.Nonempty) :
edgeDensity r s t + edgeDensity (fun x y ↦ ¬r x y) s t = 1 := by
rw [edgeDensity, edgeDensity, div_add_div_same, div_eq_one_iff_eq]
· exact mod_cast card_interedges_add_card_interedges_compl r s t
· exact mod_cast (mul_pos hs.card_pos ht.card_pos).ne'
@[simp]
theorem edgeDensity_empty_left (t : Finset β) : edgeDensity r ∅ t = 0 := by
rw [edgeDensity, Finset.card_empty, Nat.cast_zero, zero_mul, div_zero]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/Density.lean | 140 | 143 | theorem edgeDensity_empty_right (s : Finset α) : edgeDensity r s ∅ = 0 := by | rw [edgeDensity, Finset.card_empty, Nat.cast_zero, mul_zero, div_zero]
theorem card_interedges_finpartition_left [DecidableEq α] (P : Finpartition s) (t : Finset β) : |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 462 | 462 | theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kyle Miller. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kyle Miller
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.Finset
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Dart
import Mathlib.Combinatorics.SimpleGraph.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.ZMod.Basic
/-!
# Degree-sum formula and handshaking lemma
The degree-sum formula is that the sum of the degrees of the vertices in
a finite graph is equal to twice the number of edges. The handshaking lemma,
a corollary, is that the number of odd-degree vertices is even.
## Main definitions
- `SimpleGraph.sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges` is the degree-sum formula.
- `SimpleGraph.even_card_odd_degree_vertices` is the handshaking lemma.
- `SimpleGraph.odd_card_odd_degree_vertices_ne` is that the number of odd-degree
vertices different from a given odd-degree vertex is odd.
- `SimpleGraph.exists_ne_odd_degree_of_exists_odd_degree` is that the existence of an
odd-degree vertex implies the existence of another one.
## Implementation notes
We give a combinatorial proof by using the facts that (1) the map from
darts to vertices is such that each fiber has cardinality the degree
of the corresponding vertex and that (2) the map from darts to edges is 2-to-1.
## Tags
simple graphs, sums, degree-sum formula, handshaking lemma
-/
assert_not_exists Field TwoSidedIdeal
open Finset
namespace SimpleGraph
universe u
variable {V : Type u} (G : SimpleGraph V)
section DegreeSum
variable [Fintype V] [DecidableRel G.Adj]
theorem dart_fst_fiber [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
({d : G.Dart | d.fst = v} : Finset _) = univ.image (G.dartOfNeighborSet v) := by
ext d
simp only [mem_image, true_and, mem_filter, SetCoe.exists, mem_univ, exists_prop_of_true]
constructor
· rintro rfl
exact ⟨_, d.adj, by ext <;> rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨e, he, rfl⟩
rfl
theorem dart_fst_fiber_card_eq_degree [DecidableEq V] (v : V) :
#{d : G.Dart | d.fst = v} = G.degree v := by
simpa only [dart_fst_fiber, Finset.card_univ, card_neighborSet_eq_degree] using
card_image_of_injective univ (G.dartOfNeighborSet_injective v)
theorem dart_card_eq_sum_degrees : Fintype.card G.Dart = ∑ v, G.degree v := by
haveI := Classical.decEq V
simp only [← card_univ, ← dart_fst_fiber_card_eq_degree]
exact card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise (by simp)
variable {G} in
theorem Dart.edge_fiber [DecidableEq V] (d : G.Dart) :
({d' : G.Dart | d'.edge = d.edge} : Finset _) = {d, d.symm} :=
Finset.ext fun d' => by simpa using dart_edge_eq_iff d' d
theorem dart_edge_fiber_card [DecidableEq V] (e : Sym2 V) (h : e ∈ G.edgeSet) :
#{d : G.Dart | d.edge = e} = 2 := by
obtain ⟨v, w⟩ := e
let d : G.Dart := ⟨(v, w), h⟩
convert congr_arg card d.edge_fiber
rw [card_insert_of_not_mem, card_singleton]
rw [mem_singleton]
exact d.symm_ne.symm
theorem dart_card_eq_twice_card_edges : Fintype.card G.Dart = 2 * #G.edgeFinset := by
classical
rw [← card_univ]
rw [@card_eq_sum_card_fiberwise _ _ _ Dart.edge _ G.edgeFinset fun d _h =>
by rw [mem_coe, mem_edgeFinset]; apply Dart.edge_mem]
rw [← mul_comm, sum_const_nat]
intro e h
apply G.dart_edge_fiber_card e
rwa [← mem_edgeFinset]
/-- The degree-sum formula. This is also known as the handshaking lemma, which might
more specifically refer to `SimpleGraph.even_card_odd_degree_vertices`. -/
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SimpleGraph/DegreeSum.lean | 98 | 106 | theorem sum_degrees_eq_twice_card_edges : ∑ v, G.degree v = 2 * #G.edgeFinset :=
G.dart_card_eq_sum_degrees.symm.trans G.dart_card_eq_twice_card_edges
lemma two_mul_card_edgeFinset : 2 * #G.edgeFinset = #(univ.filter fun (x, y) ↦ G.Adj x y) := by | rw [← dart_card_eq_twice_card_edges, ← card_univ]
refine card_bij' (fun d _ ↦ (d.fst, d.snd)) (fun xy h ↦ ⟨xy, (mem_filter.1 h).2⟩) ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
<;> simp
variable [DecidableEq V] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Tim Baumann, Stephen Morgan, Kim Morrison, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Reassoc
/-!
# Isomorphisms
This file defines isomorphisms between objects of a category.
## Main definitions
- `structure Iso` : a bundled isomorphism between two objects of a category;
- `class IsIso` : an unbundled version of `iso`;
note that `IsIso f` is a `Prop`, and only asserts the existence of an inverse.
Of course, this inverse is unique, so it doesn't cost us much to use choice to retrieve it.
- `inv f`, for the inverse of a morphism with `[IsIso f]`
- `asIso` : convert from `IsIso` to `Iso` (noncomputable);
- `of_iso` : convert from `Iso` to `IsIso`;
- standard operations on isomorphisms (composition, inverse etc)
## Notations
- `X ≅ Y` : same as `Iso X Y`;
- `α ≪≫ β` : composition of two isomorphisms; it is called `Iso.trans`
## Tags
category, category theory, isomorphism
-/
universe v u
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category
/-- An isomorphism (a.k.a. an invertible morphism) between two objects of a category.
The inverse morphism is bundled.
See also `CategoryTheory.Core` for the category with the same objects and isomorphisms playing
the role of morphisms. -/
@[stacks 0017]
structure Iso {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] (X Y : C) where
/-- The forward direction of an isomorphism. -/
hom : X ⟶ Y
/-- The backwards direction of an isomorphism. -/
inv : Y ⟶ X
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism is the identity on the source. -/
hom_inv_id : hom ≫ inv = 𝟙 X := by aesop_cat
/-- Composition of the two directions of an isomorphism in reverse order
is the identity on the target. -/
inv_hom_id : inv ≫ hom = 𝟙 Y := by aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] Iso.hom_inv_id Iso.inv_hom_id
/-- Notation for an isomorphism in a category. -/
infixr:10 " ≅ " => Iso -- type as \cong or \iso
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] {X Y Z : C}
namespace Iso
@[ext]
theorem ext ⦃α β : X ≅ Y⦄ (w : α.hom = β.hom) : α = β :=
suffices α.inv = β.inv by
cases α
cases β
cases w
cases this
rfl
calc
α.inv = α.inv ≫ β.hom ≫ β.inv := by rw [Iso.hom_inv_id, Category.comp_id]
_ = (α.inv ≫ α.hom) ≫ β.inv := by rw [Category.assoc, ← w]
_ = β.inv := by rw [Iso.inv_hom_id, Category.id_comp]
/-- Inverse isomorphism. -/
@[symm]
def symm (I : X ≅ Y) : Y ≅ X where
hom := I.inv
inv := I.hom
@[simp]
theorem symm_hom (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.hom = α.inv :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_inv (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.inv = α.hom :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_mk {X Y : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id) :
Iso.symm { hom, inv, hom_inv_id := hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id := inv_hom_id } =
{ hom := inv, inv := hom, hom_inv_id := inv_hom_id, inv_hom_id := hom_inv_id } :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem symm_symm_eq {X Y : C} (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm.symm = α := rfl
theorem symm_bijective {X Y : C} : Function.Bijective (symm : (X ≅ Y) → _) :=
Function.bijective_iff_has_inverse.mpr ⟨_, symm_symm_eq, symm_symm_eq⟩
@[simp]
theorem symm_eq_iff {X Y : C} {α β : X ≅ Y} : α.symm = β.symm ↔ α = β :=
symm_bijective.injective.eq_iff
theorem nonempty_iso_symm (X Y : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ Y) ↔ Nonempty (Y ≅ X) :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩, fun h => ⟨h.some.symm⟩⟩
/-- Identity isomorphism. -/
@[refl, simps]
def refl (X : C) : X ≅ X where
hom := 𝟙 X
inv := 𝟙 X
instance : Inhabited (X ≅ X) := ⟨Iso.refl X⟩
theorem nonempty_iso_refl (X : C) : Nonempty (X ≅ X) := ⟨default⟩
@[simp]
theorem refl_symm (X : C) : (Iso.refl X).symm = Iso.refl X := rfl
/-- Composition of two isomorphisms -/
@[simps]
def trans (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : X ≅ Z where
hom := α.hom ≫ β.hom
inv := β.inv ≫ α.inv
@[simps]
instance instTransIso : Trans (α := C) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) (· ≅ ·) where
trans := trans
/-- Notation for composition of isomorphisms. -/
infixr:80 " ≪≫ " => Iso.trans -- type as `\ll \gg`.
@[simp]
theorem trans_mk {X Y Z : C} (hom : X ⟶ Y) (inv : Y ⟶ X) (hom_inv_id) (inv_hom_id)
(hom' : Y ⟶ Z) (inv' : Z ⟶ Y) (hom_inv_id') (inv_hom_id') (hom_inv_id'') (inv_hom_id'') :
Iso.trans ⟨hom, inv, hom_inv_id, inv_hom_id⟩ ⟨hom', inv', hom_inv_id', inv_hom_id'⟩ =
⟨hom ≫ hom', inv' ≫ inv, hom_inv_id'', inv_hom_id''⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_symm (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : (α ≪≫ β).symm = β.symm ≪≫ α.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem trans_assoc {Z' : C} (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) (γ : Z ≅ Z') :
(α ≪≫ β) ≪≫ γ = α ≪≫ β ≪≫ γ := by
ext; simp only [trans_hom, Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem refl_trans (α : X ≅ Y) : Iso.refl X ≪≫ α = α := by ext; apply Category.id_comp
@[simp]
theorem trans_refl (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ Iso.refl Y = α := by ext; apply Category.comp_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α.symm ≪≫ α = Iso.refl Y :=
ext α.inv_hom_id
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id (α : X ≅ Y) : α ≪≫ α.symm = Iso.refl X :=
ext α.hom_inv_id
@[simp]
theorem symm_self_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ Z) : α.symm ≪≫ α ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, symm_self_id, refl_trans]
@[simp]
theorem self_symm_id_assoc (α : X ≅ Y) (β : X ≅ Z) : α ≪≫ α.symm ≪≫ β = β := by
rw [← trans_assoc, self_symm_id, refl_trans]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : α.inv ≫ f = g ↔ f = α.hom ≫ g :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = α.inv ≫ f ↔ α.hom ≫ g = f :=
(inv_comp_eq α.symm).symm
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.inv = g ↔ f = g ≫ α.hom :=
⟨fun H => by simp [H.symm], fun H => by simp [H]⟩
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ α.inv ↔ g ≫ α.hom = f :=
(comp_inv_eq α.symm).symm
theorem inv_eq_inv (f g : X ≅ Y) : f.inv = g.inv ↔ f.hom = g.hom :=
have : ∀ {X Y : C} (f g : X ≅ Y), f.hom = g.hom → f.inv = g.inv := fun f g h => by rw [ext h]
⟨this f.symm g.symm, this f g⟩
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : α.hom ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_inv_comp, comp_id]
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ α.hom = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.inv := by
rw [← eq_comp_inv, id_comp]
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : α.inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = α.hom :=
hom_comp_eq_id α.symm
theorem comp_inv_eq_id (α : X ≅ Y) {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ α.inv = 𝟙 X ↔ f = α.hom :=
comp_hom_eq_id α.symm
theorem hom_eq_inv (α : X ≅ Y) (β : Y ≅ X) : α.hom = β.inv ↔ β.hom = α.inv := by
rw [← symm_inv, inv_eq_inv α.symm β, eq_comm]
rfl
/-- The bijection `(Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homToEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (Z ⟶ X) ≃ (Z ⟶ Y) where
toFun f := f ≫ α.hom
invFun g := g ≫ α.inv
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
/-- The bijection `(X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z)` induced by `α : X ≅ Y`. -/
@[simps]
def homFromEquiv (α : X ≅ Y) {Z : C} : (X ⟶ Z) ≃ (Y ⟶ Z) where
toFun f := α.inv ≫ f
invFun g := α.hom ≫ g
left_inv := by aesop_cat
right_inv := by aesop_cat
end Iso
/-- `IsIso` typeclass expressing that a morphism is invertible. -/
class IsIso (f : X ⟶ Y) : Prop where
/-- The existence of an inverse morphism. -/
out : ∃ inv : Y ⟶ X, f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X ∧ inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y
/-- The inverse of a morphism `f` when we have `[IsIso f]`.
-/
noncomputable def inv (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : Y ⟶ X :=
Classical.choose I.1
namespace IsIso
@[simp]
theorem hom_inv_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : f ≫ inv f = 𝟙 X :=
(Classical.choose_spec I.1).left
@[simp]
theorem inv_hom_id (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] : inv f ≫ f = 𝟙 Y :=
(Classical.choose_spec I.1).right
-- FIXME putting @[reassoc] on the `hom_inv_id` above somehow unfolds `inv`
-- This happens even if we make `inv` irreducible!
-- I don't understand how this is happening: it is likely a bug.
-- attribute [reassoc] hom_inv_id inv_hom_id
-- #print hom_inv_id_assoc
-- theorem CategoryTheory.IsIso.hom_inv_id_assoc {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f]
-- {Z : C} (h : X ⟶ Z),
-- f ≫ Classical.choose (_ : Exists fun inv ↦ f ≫ inv = 𝟙 X ∧ inv ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) ≫ h = h := ...
@[simp]
theorem hom_inv_id_assoc (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] {Z} (g : X ⟶ Z) : f ≫ inv f ≫ g = g := by
simp [← Category.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem inv_hom_id_assoc (f : X ⟶ Y) [I : IsIso f] {Z} (g : Y ⟶ Z) : inv f ≫ f ≫ g = g := by
simp [← Category.assoc]
end IsIso
lemma Iso.isIso_hom (e : X ≅ Y) : IsIso e.hom :=
⟨e.inv, by simp, by simp⟩
lemma Iso.isIso_inv (e : X ≅ Y) : IsIso e.inv := e.symm.isIso_hom
attribute [instance] Iso.isIso_hom Iso.isIso_inv
open IsIso
/-- Reinterpret a morphism `f` with an `IsIso f` instance as an `Iso`. -/
noncomputable def asIso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : X ≅ Y :=
⟨f, inv f, hom_inv_id f, inv_hom_id f⟩
-- Porting note: the `IsIso f` argument had been instance implicit,
-- but we've changed it to implicit as a `rw` in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Functor`
-- was failing to generate it by typeclass search.
@[simp]
theorem asIso_hom (f : X ⟶ Y) {_ : IsIso f} : (asIso f).hom = f :=
rfl
-- Porting note: the `IsIso f` argument had been instance implicit,
-- but we've changed it to implicit as a `rw` in `Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Closed.Functor`
-- was failing to generate it by typeclass search.
@[simp]
theorem asIso_inv (f : X ⟶ Y) {_ : IsIso f} : (asIso f).inv = inv f :=
rfl
namespace IsIso
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) epi_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : Epi f where
left_cancellation g h w := by
rw [← IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc f g, w, IsIso.inv_hom_id_assoc f h]
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) mono_of_iso (f : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso f] : Mono f where
right_cancellation g h w := by
rw [← Category.comp_id g, ← Category.comp_id h, ← IsIso.hom_inv_id f,
← Category.assoc, w, ← Category.assoc]
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f ≫ g = 𝟙 X) :
inv f = g := by
apply (cancel_epi f).mp
simp [hom_inv_id]
theorem inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (inv_hom_id : g ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) :
inv f = g := by
apply (cancel_mono f).mp
simp [inv_hom_id]
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem eq_inv_of_hom_inv_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f ≫ g = 𝟙 X) :
g = inv f :=
(inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id hom_inv_id).symm
theorem eq_inv_of_inv_hom_id {f : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] {g : Y ⟶ X} (inv_hom_id : g ≫ f = 𝟙 Y) :
g = inv f :=
(inv_eq_of_inv_hom_id inv_hom_id).symm
instance id (X : C) : IsIso (𝟙 X) := ⟨⟨𝟙 X, by simp⟩⟩
variable {f : X ⟶ Y} {h : Y ⟶ Z}
instance inv_isIso [IsIso f] : IsIso (inv f) :=
(asIso f).isIso_inv
/- The following instance has lower priority for the following reason:
Suppose we are given `f : X ≅ Y` with `X Y : Type u`.
Without the lower priority, typeclass inference cannot deduce `IsIso f.hom`
because `f.hom` is defeq to `(fun x ↦ x) ≫ f.hom`, triggering a loop. -/
instance (priority := 900) comp_isIso [IsIso f] [IsIso h] : IsIso (f ≫ h) :=
(asIso f ≪≫ asIso h).isIso_hom
/--
The composition of isomorphisms is an isomorphism. Here the arguments of type `IsIso` are
explicit, to make this easier to use with the `refine` tactic, for instance.
-/
lemma comp_isIso' (_ : IsIso f) (_ : IsIso h) : IsIso (f ≫ h) := inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem inv_id : inv (𝟙 X) = 𝟙 X := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp, reassoc]
theorem inv_comp [IsIso f] [IsIso h] : inv (f ≫ h) = inv h ≫ inv f := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem inv_inv [IsIso f] : inv (inv f) = f := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem Iso.inv_inv (f : X ≅ Y) : inv f.inv = f.hom := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem Iso.inv_hom (f : X ≅ Y) : inv f.hom = f.inv := by
apply inv_eq_of_hom_inv_id
simp
@[simp]
theorem inv_comp_eq (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : inv α ≫ f = g ↔ f = α ≫ g :=
(asIso α).inv_comp_eq
@[simp]
theorem eq_inv_comp (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : X ⟶ Z} {g : Y ⟶ Z} : g = inv α ≫ f ↔ α ≫ g = f :=
(asIso α).eq_inv_comp
@[simp]
theorem comp_inv_eq (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : f ≫ inv α = g ↔ f = g ≫ α :=
(asIso α).comp_inv_eq
@[simp]
theorem eq_comp_inv (α : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso α] {f : Z ⟶ Y} {g : Z ⟶ X} : g = f ≫ inv α ↔ g ≫ α = f :=
(asIso α).eq_comp_inv
theorem of_isIso_comp_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso f] [IsIso (f ≫ g)] :
IsIso g := by
rw [← id_comp g, ← inv_hom_id f, assoc]
infer_instance
theorem of_isIso_comp_right {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) [IsIso g] [IsIso (f ≫ g)] :
IsIso f := by
rw [← comp_id f, ← hom_inv_id g, ← assoc]
infer_instance
theorem of_isIso_fac_left {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [IsIso f]
[hh : IsIso h] (w : f ≫ g = h) : IsIso g := by
rw [← w] at hh
haveI := hh
exact of_isIso_comp_left f g
theorem of_isIso_fac_right {X Y Z : C} {f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {h : X ⟶ Z} [IsIso g]
[hh : IsIso h] (w : f ≫ g = h) : IsIso f := by
rw [← w] at hh
haveI := hh
exact of_isIso_comp_right f g
end IsIso
open IsIso
theorem eq_of_inv_eq_inv {f g : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] [IsIso g] (p : inv f = inv g) : f = g := by
apply (cancel_epi (inv f)).1
rw [inv_hom_id, p, inv_hom_id]
theorem IsIso.inv_eq_inv {f g : X ⟶ Y} [IsIso f] [IsIso g] : inv f = inv g ↔ f = g :=
Iso.inv_eq_inv (asIso f) (asIso g)
theorem hom_comp_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} : g ≫ f = 𝟙 X ↔ f = inv g :=
(asIso g).hom_comp_eq_id
theorem comp_hom_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} : f ≫ g = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = inv g :=
(asIso g).comp_hom_eq_id
theorem inv_comp_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : X ⟶ Y} : inv g ≫ f = 𝟙 Y ↔ f = g :=
(asIso g).inv_comp_eq_id
theorem comp_inv_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : X ⟶ Y} : f ≫ inv g = 𝟙 X ↔ f = g :=
(asIso g).comp_inv_eq_id
theorem isIso_of_hom_comp_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : g ≫ f = 𝟙 X) : IsIso f := by
rw [(hom_comp_eq_id _).mp h]
infer_instance
theorem isIso_of_comp_hom_eq_id (g : X ⟶ Y) [IsIso g] {f : Y ⟶ X} (h : f ≫ g = 𝟙 Y) : IsIso f := by
rw [(comp_hom_eq_id _).mp h]
infer_instance
namespace Iso
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem inv_ext {f : X ≅ Y} {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f.hom ≫ g = 𝟙 X) : f.inv = g :=
((hom_comp_eq_id f).1 hom_inv_id).symm
@[aesop apply safe (rule_sets := [CategoryTheory])]
theorem inv_ext' {f : X ≅ Y} {g : Y ⟶ X} (hom_inv_id : f.hom ≫ g = 𝟙 X) : g = f.inv :=
(hom_comp_eq_id f).1 hom_inv_id
/-!
All these cancellation lemmas can be solved by `simp [cancel_mono]` (or `simp [cancel_epi]`),
but with the current design `cancel_mono` is not a good `simp` lemma,
because it generates a typeclass search.
When we can see syntactically that a morphism is a `mono` or an `epi`
because it came from an isomorphism, it's fine to do the cancellation via `simp`.
In the longer term, it might be worth exploring making `mono` and `epi` structures,
rather than typeclasses, with coercions back to `X ⟶ Y`.
Presumably we could write `X ↪ Y` and `X ↠ Y`.
-/
@[simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Iso.lean | 466 | 469 | theorem cancel_iso_hom_left {X Y Z : C} (f : X ≅ Y) (g g' : Y ⟶ Z) :
f.hom ≫ g = f.hom ≫ g' ↔ g = g' := by | simp only [cancel_epi] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Anne Baanen
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dimension.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.ToNat
/-!
# Finite dimension of vector spaces
Definition of the rank of a module, or dimension of a vector space, as a natural number.
## Main definitions
Defined is `Module.finrank`, the dimension of a finite dimensional space, returning a
`Nat`, as opposed to `Module.rank`, which returns a `Cardinal`. When the space has infinite
dimension, its `finrank` is by convention set to `0`.
The definition of `finrank` does not assume a `FiniteDimensional` instance, but lemmas might.
Import `LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional` to get access to these additional lemmas.
Formulas for the dimension are given for linear equivs, in `LinearEquiv.finrank_eq`.
## Implementation notes
Most results are deduced from the corresponding results for the general dimension (as a cardinal),
in `Dimension.lean`. Not all results have been ported yet.
You should not assume that there has been any effort to state lemmas as generally as possible.
-/
universe u v w
open Cardinal Submodule Module Function
variable {R : Type u} {M : Type v} {N : Type w}
variable [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
namespace Module
section Semiring
/-- The rank of a module as a natural number.
For a finite-dimensional vector space `V` over a field `k`, `Module.finrank k V` is equal to
the dimension of `V` over `k`.
For a general module `M` over a ring `R`, `Module.finrank R M` is defined to be the supremum of the
cardinalities of the `R`-linearly independent subsets of `M`, if this supremum is finite. It is
defined by convention to be `0` if this supremum is infinite. See `Module.rank` for a
cardinal-valued version where infinite rank modules have rank an infinite cardinal.
Note that if `R` is not a field then there can exist modules `M` with `¬(Module.Finite R M)` but
`finrank R M ≠ 0`. For example `ℚ` has `finrank` equal to `1` over `ℤ`, because the nonempty
`ℤ`-linearly independent subsets of `ℚ` are precisely the nonzero singletons. -/
noncomputable def finrank (R M : Type*) [Semiring R] [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] : ℕ :=
Cardinal.toNat (Module.rank R M)
theorem finrank_eq_of_rank_eq {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M = ↑n) : finrank R M = n := by
simp [finrank, h]
lemma rank_eq_one_iff_finrank_eq_one : Module.rank R M = 1 ↔ finrank R M = 1 :=
Cardinal.toNat_eq_one.symm
/-- This is like `rank_eq_one_iff_finrank_eq_one` but works for `2`, `3`, `4`, ... -/
lemma rank_eq_ofNat_iff_finrank_eq_ofNat (n : ℕ) [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] :
Module.rank R M = OfNat.ofNat n ↔ finrank R M = OfNat.ofNat n :=
Cardinal.toNat_eq_ofNat.symm
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Dimension/Finrank.lean | 72 | 75 | theorem finrank_le_of_rank_le {n : ℕ} (h : Module.rank R M ≤ ↑n) : finrank R M ≤ n := by | rwa [← Cardinal.toNat_le_iff_le_of_lt_aleph0, toNat_natCast] at h
· exact h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 n)
· exact nat_lt_aleph0 n |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yakov Pechersky. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yakov Pechersky
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Finset.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Hom
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Pi.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Basic
/-!
# Products (respectively, sums) over a finset or a multiset.
The regular `Finset.prod` and `Multiset.prod` require `[CommMonoid α]`.
Often, there are collections `s : Finset α` where `[Monoid α]` and we know,
in a dependent fashion, that for all the terms `∀ (x ∈ s) (y ∈ s), Commute x y`.
This allows to still have a well-defined product over `s`.
## Main definitions
- `Finset.noncommProd`, requiring a proof of commutativity of held terms
- `Multiset.noncommProd`, requiring a proof of commutativity of held terms
## Implementation details
While `List.prod` is defined via `List.foldl`, `noncommProd` is defined via
`Multiset.foldr` for neater proofs and definitions. By the commutativity assumption,
the two must be equal.
TODO: Tidy up this file by using the fact that the submonoid generated by commuting
elements is commutative and using the `Finset.prod` versions of lemmas to prove the `noncommProd`
version.
-/
variable {F ι α β γ : Type*} (f : α → β → β) (op : α → α → α)
namespace Multiset
/-- Fold of a `s : Multiset α` with `f : α → β → β`, given a proof that `LeftCommutative f`
on all elements `x ∈ s`. -/
def noncommFoldr (s : Multiset α)
(comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b)) (b : β) : β :=
letI : LeftCommutative (α := { x // x ∈ s }) (f ∘ Subtype.val) :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hx⟩ ⟨_, hy⟩ =>
haveI : IsRefl α fun x y => ∀ b, f x (f y b) = f y (f x b) := ⟨fun _ _ => rfl⟩
comm.of_refl hx hy⟩
s.attach.foldr (f ∘ Subtype.val) b
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_coe (l : List α) (comm) (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (l : Multiset α) comm b = l.foldr f b := by
simp only [noncommFoldr, coe_foldr, coe_attach, List.attach, List.attachWith, Function.comp_def]
rw [← List.foldr_map]
simp [List.map_pmap]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFoldr_empty (h) (b : β) : noncommFoldr f (0 : Multiset α) h b = b :=
rfl
theorem noncommFoldr_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (h h') (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f (a ::ₘ s) h b = f a (noncommFoldr f s h' b) := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
theorem noncommFoldr_eq_foldr (s : Multiset α) [h : LeftCommutative f] (b : β) :
noncommFoldr f s (fun x _ y _ _ => h.left_comm x y) b = foldr f b s := by
induction s using Quotient.inductionOn
simp
section assoc
variable [assoc : Std.Associative op]
/-- Fold of a `s : Multiset α` with an associative `op : α → α → α`, given a proofs that `op`
is commutative on all elements `x ∈ s`. -/
def noncommFold (s : Multiset α) (comm : { x | x ∈ s }.Pairwise fun x y => op x y = op y x) :
α → α :=
noncommFoldr op s fun x hx y hy h b => by rw [← assoc.assoc, comm hx hy h, assoc.assoc]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFold_coe (l : List α) (comm) (a : α) :
noncommFold op (l : Multiset α) comm a = l.foldr op a := by simp [noncommFold]
@[simp]
theorem noncommFold_empty (h) (a : α) : noncommFold op (0 : Multiset α) h a = a :=
rfl
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/NoncommProd.lean | 88 | 89 | theorem noncommFold_cons (s : Multiset α) (a : α) (h h') (x : α) :
noncommFold op (a ::ₘ s) h x = op a (noncommFold op s h' x) := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Richard M. Hill. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Richard M. Hill
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Trunc
import Mathlib.RingTheory.PowerSeries.Inverse
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.Basic
/-!
# Definitions
In this file we define an operation `derivative` (formal differentiation)
on the ring of formal power series in one variable (over an arbitrary commutative semiring).
Under suitable assumptions, we prove that two power series are equal if their derivatives
are equal and their constant terms are equal. This will give us a simple tool for proving
power series identities. For example, one can easily prove the power series identity
$\exp ( \log (1+X)) = 1+X$ by differentiating twice.
## Main Definition
- `PowerSeries.derivative R : Derivation R R⟦X⟧ R⟦X⟧` the formal derivative operation.
This is abbreviated `d⁄dX R`.
-/
namespace PowerSeries
open Polynomial Derivation Nat
section CommutativeSemiring
variable {R} [CommSemiring R]
/--
The formal derivative of a power series in one variable.
This is defined here as a function, but will be packaged as a
derivation `derivative` on `R⟦X⟧`.
-/
noncomputable def derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) : R⟦X⟧ := mk fun n ↦ coeff R (n + 1) f * (n + 1)
theorem coeff_derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n f.derivativeFun = coeff R (n + 1) f * (n + 1) := by
rw [derivativeFun, coeff_mk]
theorem derivativeFun_coe (f : R[X]) : (f : R⟦X⟧).derivativeFun = derivative f := by
ext
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_coe, coeff_coe, coeff_derivative]
theorem derivativeFun_add (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
derivativeFun (f + g) = derivativeFun f + derivativeFun g := by
ext
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, map_add, map_add, coeff_derivativeFun,
coeff_derivativeFun, add_mul]
theorem derivativeFun_C (r : R) : derivativeFun (C R r) = 0 := by
ext n
-- Note that `map_zero` didn't get picked up, apparently due to a missing `FunLike.coe`
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_succ_C, zero_mul, (coeff R n).map_zero]
theorem trunc_derivativeFun (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n f.derivativeFun = derivative (trunc (n + 1) f) := by
ext d
rw [coeff_trunc]
split_ifs with h
· have : d + 1 < n + 1 := succ_lt_succ_iff.2 h
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, coeff_derivative, coeff_trunc, if_pos this]
· have : ¬d + 1 < n + 1 := by rwa [succ_lt_succ_iff]
rw [coeff_derivative, coeff_trunc, if_neg this, zero_mul]
--A special case of `derivativeFun_mul`, used in its proof.
private theorem derivativeFun_coe_mul_coe (f g : R[X]) : derivativeFun (f * g : R⟦X⟧) =
f * derivative g + g * derivative f := by
rw [← coe_mul, derivativeFun_coe, derivative_mul,
add_comm, mul_comm _ g, ← coe_mul, ← coe_mul, Polynomial.coe_add]
/-- **Leibniz rule for formal power series**. -/
theorem derivativeFun_mul (f g : R⟦X⟧) :
derivativeFun (f * g) = f • g.derivativeFun + g • f.derivativeFun := by
ext n
have h₁ : n < n + 1 := lt_succ_self n
have h₂ : n < n + 1 + 1 := Nat.lt_add_right _ h₁
rw [coeff_derivativeFun, map_add, coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc _ _ (lt_succ_self _),
smul_eq_mul, smul_eq_mul, coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc₂ g f.derivativeFun h₂ h₁,
coeff_mul_eq_coeff_trunc_mul_trunc₂ f g.derivativeFun h₂ h₁, trunc_derivativeFun,
trunc_derivativeFun, ← map_add, ← derivativeFun_coe_mul_coe, coeff_derivativeFun]
theorem derivativeFun_one : derivativeFun (1 : R⟦X⟧) = 0 := by
rw [← map_one (C R), derivativeFun_C (1 : R)]
theorem derivativeFun_smul (r : R) (f : R⟦X⟧) : derivativeFun (r • f) = r • derivativeFun f := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, smul_eq_C_mul, derivativeFun_mul, derivativeFun_C, smul_zero, add_zero,
smul_eq_mul]
variable (R)
/-- The formal derivative of a formal power series -/
noncomputable def derivative : Derivation R R⟦X⟧ R⟦X⟧ where
toFun := derivativeFun
map_add' := derivativeFun_add
map_smul' := derivativeFun_smul
map_one_eq_zero' := derivativeFun_one
leibniz' := derivativeFun_mul
/-- Abbreviation of `PowerSeries.derivative`, the formal derivative on `R⟦X⟧` -/
scoped notation "d⁄dX" => derivative
variable {R}
@[simp] theorem derivative_C (r : R) : d⁄dX R (C R r) = 0 := derivativeFun_C r
theorem coeff_derivative (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
coeff R n (d⁄dX R f) = coeff R (n + 1) f * (n + 1) := coeff_derivativeFun f n
theorem derivative_coe (f : R[X]) : d⁄dX R f = Polynomial.derivative f := derivativeFun_coe f
@[simp] theorem derivative_X : d⁄dX R (X : R⟦X⟧) = 1 := by
ext
rw [coeff_derivative, coeff_one, coeff_X, boole_mul]
simp_rw [add_eq_right]
split_ifs with h
· rw [h, cast_zero, zero_add]
· rfl
theorem trunc_derivative (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc n (d⁄dX R f) = Polynomial.derivative (trunc (n + 1) f) :=
trunc_derivativeFun ..
theorem trunc_derivative' (f : R⟦X⟧) (n : ℕ) :
trunc (n-1) (d⁄dX R f) = Polynomial.derivative (trunc n f) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp
| succ n =>
rw [succ_sub_one, trunc_derivative]
end CommutativeSemiring
/- In the next lemma, we use `smul_right_inj`, which requires not only `NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R`, but
also cancellation of addition in `R`. For this reason, the next lemma is stated in the case that `R`
is a `CommRing`. -/
/-- If `f` and `g` have the same constant term and derivative, then they are equal. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/PowerSeries/Derivative.lean | 142 | 151 | theorem derivative.ext {R} [CommRing R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors ℕ R] {f g} (hD : d⁄dX R f = d⁄dX R g)
(hc : constantCoeff R f = constantCoeff R g) : f = g := by | ext n
cases n with
| zero =>
rw [coeff_zero_eq_constantCoeff, hc]
| succ n =>
have equ : coeff R n (d⁄dX R f) = coeff R n (d⁄dX R g) := by rw [hD]
rwa [coeff_derivative, coeff_derivative, ← cast_succ, mul_comm, ← nsmul_eq_mul,
mul_comm, ← nsmul_eq_mul, smul_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero] at equ |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.SetLike.Basic
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Semantics
/-!
# Definable Sets
This file defines what it means for a set over a first-order structure to be definable.
## Main Definitions
- `Set.Definable` is defined so that `A.Definable L s` indicates that the
set `s` of a finite cartesian power of `M` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- `Set.Definable₁` is defined so that `A.Definable₁ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set M)` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- `Set.Definable₂` is defined so that `A.Definable₂ L s` indicates that
`(s : Set (M × M))` is definable with parameters in `A`.
- A `FirstOrder.Language.DefinableSet` is defined so that `L.DefinableSet A α` is the boolean
algebra of subsets of `α → M` defined by formulas with parameters in `A`.
## Main Results
- `L.DefinableSet A α` forms a `BooleanAlgebra`
- `Set.Definable.image_comp` shows that definability is closed under projections in finite
dimensions.
-/
universe u v w u₁
namespace Set
variable {M : Type w} (A : Set M) (L : FirstOrder.Language.{u, v}) [L.Structure M]
open FirstOrder FirstOrder.Language FirstOrder.Language.Structure
variable {α : Type u₁} {β : Type*}
/-- A subset of a finite Cartesian product of a structure is definable over a set `A` when
membership in the set is given by a first-order formula with parameters from `A`. -/
def Definable (s : Set (α → M)) : Prop :=
∃ φ : L[[A]].Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize
variable {L} {A} {B : Set M} {s : Set (α → M)}
theorem Definable.map_expansion {L' : FirstOrder.Language} [L'.Structure M] (h : A.Definable L s)
(φ : L →ᴸ L') [φ.IsExpansionOn M] : A.Definable L' s := by
obtain ⟨ψ, rfl⟩ := h
refine ⟨(φ.addConstants A).onFormula ψ, ?_⟩
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, LHom.realize_onFormula]
theorem definable_iff_exists_formula_sum :
A.Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula (A ⊕ α), s = {v | φ.Realize (Sum.elim (↑) v)} := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv)]
refine exists_congr (fun φ => iff_iff_eq.2 (congr_arg (s = ·) ?_))
ext
simp only [BoundedFormula.constantsVarsEquiv, constantsOn,
BoundedFormula.mapTermRelEquiv_symm_apply, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.Realize]
refine BoundedFormula.realize_mapTermRel_id ?_ (fun _ _ _ => rfl)
intros
simp only [Term.constantsVarsEquivLeft_symm_apply, Term.realize_varsToConstants,
coe_con, Term.realize_relabel]
congr
ext a
rcases a with (_ | _) | _ <;> rfl
theorem empty_definable_iff :
(∅ : Set M).Definable L s ↔ ∃ φ : L.Formula α, s = setOf φ.Realize := by
rw [Definable, Equiv.exists_congr_left (LEquiv.addEmptyConstants L (∅ : Set M)).onFormula]
simp
theorem definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params :
A.Definable L s ↔ (∅ : Set M).Definable (L[[A]]) s :=
empty_definable_iff.symm
theorem Definable.mono (hAs : A.Definable L s) (hAB : A ⊆ B) : B.Definable L s := by
rw [definable_iff_empty_definable_with_params] at *
exact hAs.map_expansion (L.lhomWithConstantsMap (Set.inclusion hAB))
@[simp]
theorem definable_empty : A.Definable L (∅ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊥, by
ext
simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem definable_univ : A.Definable L (univ : Set (α → M)) :=
⟨⊤, by
ext
simp⟩
@[simp]
theorem Definable.inter {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∩ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, rfl⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, rfl⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊓ θ, ?_⟩
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem Definable.union {f g : Set (α → M)} (hf : A.Definable L f) (hg : A.Definable L g) :
A.Definable L (f ∪ g) := by
rcases hf with ⟨φ, hφ⟩
rcases hg with ⟨θ, hθ⟩
refine ⟨φ ⊔ θ, ?_⟩
ext
rw [hφ, hθ, mem_setOf_eq, Formula.realize_sup, mem_union, mem_setOf_eq, mem_setOf_eq]
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/Definability.lean | 116 | 122 | theorem definable_finset_inf {ι : Type*} {f : ι → Set (α → M)} (hf : ∀ i, A.Definable L (f i))
(s : Finset ι) : A.Definable L (s.inf f) := by | classical
refine Finset.induction definable_univ (fun i s _ h => ?_) s
rw [Finset.inf_insert]
exact (hf i).inter h |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Cofinite
import Mathlib.RingTheory.DedekindDomain.Ideal
import Mathlib.RingTheory.UniqueFactorizationDomain.Finite
/-!
# Factorization of ideals and fractional ideals of Dedekind domains
Every nonzero ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product `∏_v v^{n_v}` over the
maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are natural numbers.
Similarly, every nonzero fractional ideal `I` of a Dedekind domain `R` can be factored as a product
`∏_v v^{n_v}` over the maximal ideals of `R`, where the exponents `n_v` are integers. We define
`FractionalIdeal.count K v I` (abbreviated as `val_v(I)` in the documentation) to be `n_v`, and we
prove some of its properties. If `I = 0`, we define `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main definitions
- `FractionalIdeal.count` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of
`R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we
set `val_v(I) = 0`.
## Main results
- `Ideal.finite_factors` : Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal.
- `Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : The ideal `I` equals the finprod
`∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, where `val_v(I)` denotes the multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`
and `v` runs over the maximal ideals of `R`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal,
`a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization'` : If `I` is a nonzero fractional
ideal, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal` : For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`,
the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`.
- `FractionalIdeal.finite_factors` : If `I ≠ 0`, then `val_v(I) = 0` for all but finitely many
maximal ideals of `R`.
## Implementation notes
Since we are only interested in the factorization of nonzero fractional ideals, we define
`val_v(0) = 0` so that every `val_v` is in `ℤ` and we can avoid having to use `WithTop ℤ`.
## Tags
dedekind domain, fractional ideal, ideal, factorization
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped nonZeroDivisors
open Set Function UniqueFactorizationMonoid IsDedekindDomain IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum
variable {R : Type*} [CommRing R] {K : Type*} [Field K] [Algebra R K] [IsFractionRing R K]
/-! ### Factorization of ideals of Dedekind domains -/
variable [IsDedekindDomain R] (v : HeightOneSpectrum R)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Given a maximal ideal `v` and an ideal `I` of `R`, `maxPowDividing` returns the maximal
power of `v` dividing `I`. -/
def IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing (I : Ideal R) : Ideal R :=
v.asIdeal ^ (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors
/-- Only finitely many maximal ideals of `R` divide a given nonzero ideal. -/
theorem Ideal.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I}.Finite := by
rw [← Set.finite_coe_iff, Set.coe_setOf]
haveI h_fin := fintypeSubtypeDvd I hI
refine
Finite.of_injective (fun v => (⟨(v : HeightOneSpectrum R).asIdeal, v.2⟩ : { x // x ∣ I })) ?_
intro v w hvw
simp? at hvw says simp only [Subtype.mk.injEq] at hvw
exact Subtype.coe_injective (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw)
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that the
multiplicity of `v` in the factorization of `I`, denoted `val_v(I)`, is nonzero. -/
theorem Associates.finite_factors {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∀ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R in Filter.cofinite,
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0 := by
have h_supp : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | ¬((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) = 0} = {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.asIdeal ∣ I} := by
ext v
simp_rw [Int.natCast_eq_zero]
exact Associates.count_ne_zero_iff_dvd hI v.irreducible
rw [Filter.eventually_cofinite, h_supp]
exact Ideal.finite_factors hI
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => v.maxPowDividing I).Finite :=
haveI h_subset : {v : HeightOneSpectrum R | v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 1} ⊆
{v : HeightOneSpectrum R |
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ) ≠ 0} := by
intro v hv h_zero
have hv' : v.maxPowDividing I = 1 := by
rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, Int.natCast_eq_zero.mp h_zero,
pow_zero _]
exact hv hv'
Finite.subset (Filter.eventually_cofinite.mp (Associates.finite_factors hI)) h_subset
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^(val_v(I))`, regarded as a fractional ideal, is not `(1)`. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [Ne, zpow_natCast, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, there are finitely many maximal ideals `v` such that
`v^-(val_v(I))` is not the unit ideal. -/
theorem finite_mulSupport_inv {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(mulSupport fun v : HeightOneSpectrum R => (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
(-((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ))).Finite := by
rw [mulSupport]
simp_rw [zpow_neg, Ne, inv_eq_one]
exact finite_mulSupport_coe hI
open scoped Classical in
/-- For every nonzero ideal `I` of `v`, `v^(val_v(I) + 1)` does not divide `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_not_dvd (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) :
¬v.asIdeal ^ ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors + 1) ∣
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I := by
have hf := finite_mulSupport hI
have h_ne_zero : v.maxPowDividing I ≠ 0 := pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
rw [← mul_finprod_cond_ne v hf, pow_add, pow_one, finprod_cond_ne _ _ hf]
intro h_contr
have hv_prime : Prime v.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime v.ne_bot v.isPrime
obtain ⟨w, hw, hvw'⟩ :=
Prime.exists_mem_finset_dvd hv_prime ((mul_dvd_mul_iff_left h_ne_zero).mp h_contr)
have hw_prime : Prime w.asIdeal := Ideal.prime_of_isPrime w.ne_bot w.isPrime
have hvw := Prime.dvd_of_dvd_pow hv_prime hvw'
rw [Prime.dvd_prime_iff_associated hv_prime hw_prime, associated_iff_eq] at hvw
exact (Finset.mem_erase.mp hw).1 (HeightOneSpectrum.ext hvw.symm)
end Ideal
theorem Associates.finprod_ne_zero (I : Ideal R) :
Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I) ≠ 0 := by
classical
rw [Associates.mk_ne_zero, finprod_def]
split_ifs
· rw [Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff]
intro v _
apply pow_ne_zero _ v.ne_bot
· exact one_ne_zero
namespace Ideal
open scoped Classical in
/-- The multiplicity of `v` in `∏_v v^(val_v(I))` equals `val_v(I)`. -/
theorem finprod_count (I : Ideal R) (hI : I ≠ 0) : (Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I)).factors =
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors := by
have h_ne_zero := Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := v.associates_irreducible
have h_dvd := finprod_mem_dvd v (Ideal.finite_mulSupport hI)
have h_not_dvd := Ideal.finprod_not_dvd v I hI
simp only [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing] at h_dvd h_ne_zero h_not_dvd
rw [← Associates.mk_dvd_mk] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
simp only [Associates.dvd_eq_le] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [Associates.mk_pow, Associates.prime_pow_dvd_iff_le h_ne_zero hv] at h_dvd h_not_dvd
rw [not_le] at h_not_dvd
apply Nat.eq_of_le_of_lt_succ h_dvd h_not_dvd
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, v.maxPowDividing I = I := by
rw [← associated_iff_eq, ← Associates.mk_eq_mk_iff_associated]
classical
apply Associates.eq_of_eq_counts
· apply Associates.finprod_ne_zero I
· apply Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr hI
intro v hv
obtain ⟨J, hJv⟩ := Associates.exists_rep v
rw [← hJv, Associates.irreducible_mk] at hv
rw [← hJv]
apply Ideal.finprod_count
⟨J, Ideal.isPrime_of_prime (irreducible_iff_prime.mp hv), Irreducible.ne_zero hv⟩ I hI
variable (K)
open scoped Classical in
/-- The ideal `I` equals the finprod `∏_v v^(val_v(I))`, when both sides are regarded as fractional
ideals of `R`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe {I : Ideal R} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
(∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk I).factors : ℤ)) = I := by
conv_rhs => rw [← Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization hI]
rw [FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_finprod R⁰ K (le_refl _)]
simp_rw [IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.maxPowDividing, FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_pow,
zpow_natCast]
end Ideal
/-! ### Factorization of fractional ideals of Dedekind domains -/
namespace FractionalIdeal
open Int IsLocalization
open scoped Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that
`I = a⁻¹J`, then `I` is equal to the product `∏_v v^(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (haJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) = I := by
have hJ_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have hJ := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K hJ_ne_zero
have ha_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI haJ
have ha := Ideal.finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_coe K ha_ne_zero
rw [haJ, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_mul_inv, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← hJ, ← ha,
← finprod_inv_distrib]
simp_rw [← zpow_neg]
rw [← finprod_mul_distrib (Ideal.finite_mulSupport_coe hJ_ne_zero)
(Ideal.finite_mulSupport_inv ha_ne_zero)]
apply finprod_congr
intro v
rw [← zpow_add₀ ((@coeIdeal_ne_zero R _ K _ _ _ _).mpr v.ne_bot), sub_eq_add_neg]
open scoped Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction {n : R} (hn : n ≠ 0) (d : ↥R⁰) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑d : R)}) :
Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) := by
have hd_ne_zero : (algebraMap R K) (d : R) ≠ 0 :=
map_ne_zero_of_mem_nonZeroDivisors _ (IsFractionRing.injective R K) d.property
have h0 : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) ≠ 0 := by
rw [spanSingleton_ne_zero_iff, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, ne_eq, div_eq_zero_iff, not_or]
exact ⟨(map_ne_zero_iff (algebraMap R K) (IsFractionRing.injective R K)).mpr hn, hd_ne_zero⟩
have hI : spanSingleton R⁰ (mk' K n d) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) d)⁻¹ * ↑(Ideal.span {n} : Ideal R) := by
rw [coeIdeal_span_singleton, spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton]
apply congr_arg
rw [IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_comm]
exact finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization h0 hI
open Classical in
/-- For a nonzero `k = r/s ∈ K`, the fractional ideal `(k)` is equal to the product
`∏_v v^(val_v(r) - val_v(s))`. -/
theorem finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0)
(k : K) (hk : I = spanSingleton R⁰ k) :
∏ᶠ v : HeightOneSpectrum R, (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose
(mk'_surjective R⁰ k)} : Ideal R)).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk ((Ideal.span {(↑(choose
(choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)) : ↥R⁰) : R)}) : Ideal R)).factors : ℤ) = I := by
set n : R := choose (mk'_surjective R⁰ k)
set d : ↥R⁰ := choose (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hnd : mk' K n d = k := choose_spec (choose_spec (mk'_surjective R⁰ k))
have hn0 : n ≠ 0 := by
by_contra h
rw [← hnd, h, IsFractionRing.mk'_eq_div, map_zero, zero_div, spanSingleton_zero] at hk
exact hI hk
rw [finprod_heightOneSpectrum_factorization_principal_fraction hn0 d, hk, hnd]
variable (K)
open Classical in
/-- If `I` is a nonzero fractional ideal, `a ∈ R`, and `J` is an ideal of `R` such that `I = a⁻¹J`,
then we define `val_v(I)` as `(val_v(J) - val_v(a))`. If `I = 0`, we set `val_v(I) = 0`. -/
def count (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) : ℤ :=
dite (I = 0) (fun _ : I = 0 => 0) fun _ : ¬I = 0 =>
let a := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
let J := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ)
/-- val_v(0) = 0. -/
lemma count_zero : count K v (0 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by simp only [count, dif_pos]
open Classical in
lemma count_ne_zero {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk
(choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)))).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count
(Associates.mk (Ideal.span {choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)})).factors : ℤ) := by
simp only [count, dif_neg hI]
open Classical in
/-- `val_v(I)` does not depend on the choice of `a` and `J` used to represent `I`. -/
theorem count_well_defined {I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) {a : R}
{J : Ideal R} (h_aJ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a)⁻¹ * ↑J) :
count K v I = ((Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk J).factors -
(Associates.mk v.asIdeal).count (Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a})).factors : ℤ) := by
set a₁ := choose (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I)
set J₁ := choose (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))
have h_a₁J₁ : I = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁)⁻¹ * ↑J₁ :=
(choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).2
have h_a₁_ne_zero : a₁ ≠ 0 := (choose_spec (choose_spec (exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I))).1
have h_J₁_ne_zero : J₁ ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_a₁J₁
have h_a_ne_zero : Ideal.span {a} ≠ 0 := constant_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_J_ne_zero : J ≠ 0 := ideal_factor_ne_zero hI h_aJ
have h_a₁' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a₁) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
have h_a' : spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) a) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, spanSingleton_eq_zero_iff, ← (algebraMap R K).map_zero,
Injective.eq_iff (IsLocalization.injective K (le_refl R⁰))]
rw [ne_eq, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot] at h_a_ne_zero
exact h_a_ne_zero
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by
exact Associates.irreducible_mk.mpr v.irreducible
rw [h_a₁J₁, ← div_spanSingleton, ← div_spanSingleton, div_eq_div_iff h_a₁' h_a',
← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_span_singleton, ← coeIdeal_mul, ← coeIdeal_mul] at h_aJ
rw [count, dif_neg hI, sub_eq_sub_iff_add_eq_add, ← Int.natCast_add, ← Int.natCast_add,
natCast_inj, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, ← Associates.count_mul _ _ hv, Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.mk_mul_mk, coeIdeal_injective h_aJ]
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]
exact h_a₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_J₁_ne_zero
· rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero]; exact h_a_ne_zero
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. -/
theorem count_mul {I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K} (hI : I ≠ 0) (hI' : I' ≠ 0) :
count K v (I * I') = count K v I + count K v I' := by
classical
have hv : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
obtain ⟨a, J, ha, haJ⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I
have ha_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha
have hJ_ne_zero : Associates.mk J ≠ 0 := Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI haJ)
obtain ⟨a', J', ha', haJ'⟩ := exists_eq_spanSingleton_mul I'
have ha'_ne_zero : Associates.mk (Ideal.span {a'} : Ideal R) ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, Associates.mk_eq_zero, Ideal.zero_eq_bot, Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot]; exact ha'
have hJ'_ne_zero : Associates.mk J' ≠ 0 :=
Associates.mk_ne_zero.mpr (ideal_factor_ne_zero hI' haJ')
have h_prod : I * I' = spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) (a * a'))⁻¹ * ↑(J * J') := by
rw [haJ, haJ', mul_assoc, mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K), mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
spanSingleton_mul_spanSingleton, coeIdeal_mul, RingHom.map_mul, mul_inv,
mul_comm (J : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K)]
rw [count_well_defined K v hI haJ, count_well_defined K v hI' haJ',
count_well_defined K v (mul_ne_zero hI hI') h_prod, ← Associates.mk_mul_mk,
Associates.count_mul hJ_ne_zero hJ'_ne_zero hv, ← Ideal.span_singleton_mul_span_singleton,
← Associates.mk_mul_mk, Associates.count_mul ha_ne_zero ha'_ne_zero hv]
push_cast
ring
/-- For nonzero `I, I'`, `val_v(I*I') = val_v(I) + val_v(I')`. If `I` or `I'` is zero, then
`val_v(I*I') = 0`. -/
theorem count_mul' (I I' : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) [Decidable (I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0)] :
count K v (I * I') = if I ≠ 0 ∧ I' ≠ 0 then count K v I + count K v I' else 0 := by
split_ifs with h
· exact count_mul K v h.1 h.2
· push_neg at h
by_cases hI : I = 0
· rw [hI, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
· rw [h hI, MulZeroClass.mul_zero, count, dif_pos (Eq.refl _)]
/-- val_v(1) = 0. -/
theorem count_one : count K v (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 0 := by
have h1 : (1 : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑(1 : Ideal R) := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, coeIdeal_top, mul_one, inv_one,
spanSingleton_one]
rw [count_well_defined K v one_ne_zero h1, Ideal.span_singleton_one, Ideal.one_eq_top, sub_self]
theorem count_prod {ι} (s : Finset ι) (I : ι → FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) (hS : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0) :
count K v (∏ i ∈ s, I i) = ∑ i ∈ s, count K v (I i) := by
classical
induction' s using Finset.induction with i s hi hrec
· rw [Finset.prod_empty, Finset.sum_empty, count_one]
· have hS' : ∀ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := fun j hj => hS j (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hj)
have hS0 : ∏ i ∈ s, I i ≠ 0 := Finset.prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr hS'
have hi0 : I i ≠ 0 := hS i (Finset.mem_insert_self i s)
rw [Finset.prod_insert hi, Finset.sum_insert hi, count_mul K v hi0 hS0, hrec hS']
/-- For every `n ∈ ℕ` and every ideal `I`, `val_v(I^n) = n*val_v(I)`. -/
theorem count_pow (n : ℕ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by
induction' n with n h
· rw [pow_zero, ofNat_zero, MulZeroClass.zero_mul, count_one]
· classical rw [pow_succ, count_mul']
by_cases hI : I = 0
· have h_neg : ¬(I ^ n ≠ 0 ∧ I ≠ 0) := by
rw [not_and', not_not, ne_eq]
intro h
exact absurd hI h
rw [if_neg h_neg, hI, count_zero, MulZeroClass.mul_zero]
· rw [if_pos (And.intro (pow_ne_zero n hI) hI), h, Nat.cast_add,
Nat.cast_one]
ring
/-- `val_v(v) = 1`, when `v` is regarded as a fractional ideal. -/
theorem count_self : count K v (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) = 1 := by
have hv : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ≠ 0 := coeIdeal_ne_zero.mpr v.ne_bot
have h_self : (v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) =
spanSingleton R⁰ ((algebraMap R K) 1)⁻¹ * ↑v.asIdeal := by
rw [(algebraMap R K).map_one, inv_one, spanSingleton_one, one_mul]
have hv_irred : Irreducible (Associates.mk v.asIdeal) := by apply v.associates_irreducible
classical rw [count_well_defined K v hv h_self, Associates.count_self hv_irred,
Ideal.span_singleton_one, ← Ideal.one_eq_top, Associates.mk_one, Associates.factors_one,
Associates.count_zero hv_irred, ofNat_zero, sub_zero, ofNat_one]
/-- `val_v(v^n) = n` for every `n ∈ ℕ`. -/
theorem count_pow_self (n : ℕ) :
count K v ((v.asIdeal : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) ^ n) = n := by
rw [count_pow, count_self, mul_one]
/-- `val_v(I⁻ⁿ) = -val_v(Iⁿ)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_neg_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ (-n)) = - count K v (I ^ n) := by
by_cases hI : I = 0
· by_cases hn : n = 0
· rw [hn, neg_zero, zpow_zero, count_one, neg_zero]
· rw [hI, zero_zpow n hn, zero_zpow (-n) (neg_ne_zero.mpr hn), count_zero, neg_zero]
· rw [eq_neg_iff_add_eq_zero, ← count_mul K v (zpow_ne_zero _ hI) (zpow_ne_zero _ hI),
← zpow_add₀ hI, neg_add_cancel, zpow_zero]
exact count_one K v
| Mathlib/RingTheory/DedekindDomain/Factorization.lean | 427 | 433 | theorem count_inv (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I⁻¹) = - count K v I := by | rw [← zpow_neg_one, count_neg_zpow K v (1 : ℤ) I, zpow_one]
/-- `val_v(Iⁿ) = n*val_v(I)` for every `n ∈ ℤ`. -/
theorem count_zpow (n : ℤ) (I : FractionalIdeal R⁰ K) :
count K v (I ^ n) = n * count K v I := by |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Floris van Doorn, Gabriel Ebner, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Accumulate
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Finset
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Nat
/-!
# Conditionally complete linear order structure on `ℕ`
In this file we
* define a `ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot` structure on `ℕ`;
* prove a few lemmas about `iSup`/`iInf`/`Set.iUnion`/`Set.iInter` and natural numbers.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
open Set
namespace Nat
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : InfSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, n ∈ s then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance : SupSet ℕ :=
⟨fun s ↦ if h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n then @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h else 0⟩
open scoped Classical in
theorem sInf_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ n ∈ s) _ h :=
dif_pos _
open scoped Classical in
theorem sSup_def {s : Set ℕ} (h : ∃ n, ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) :
sSup s = @Nat.find (fun n ↦ ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ n) _ h :=
dif_pos _
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.Nat.sSup_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Infinite) : sSup s = 0 :=
dif_neg fun ⟨n, hn⟩ ↦
let ⟨k, hks, hk⟩ := h.exists_gt n
(hn k hks).not_lt hk
@[simp]
theorem sInf_eq_zero {s : Set ℕ} : sInf s = 0 ↔ 0 ∈ s ∨ s = ∅ := by
cases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with
| inl h => subst h
simp only [or_true, eq_self_iff_true, iInf, InfSet.sInf,
mem_empty_iff_false, exists_false, dif_neg, not_false_iff]
| inr h => simp only [h.ne_empty, or_false, Nat.sInf_def, h, Nat.find_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem sInf_empty : sInf ∅ = 0 := by
rw [sInf_eq_zero]
right
rfl
@[simp]
theorem iInf_of_empty {ι : Sort*} [IsEmpty ι] (f : ι → ℕ) : iInf f = 0 := by
rw [iInf_of_isEmpty, sInf_empty]
/-- This combines `Nat.iInf_of_empty` with `ciInf_const`. -/
@[simp]
lemma iInf_const_zero {ι : Sort*} : ⨅ _ : ι, 0 = 0 :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty ι).elim (fun h ↦ by simp) fun h ↦ sInf_eq_zero.2 <| by simp
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Lattice.lean | 70 | 73 | theorem sInf_mem {s : Set ℕ} (h : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s := by | classical
rw [Nat.sInf_def h]
exact Nat.find_spec h |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Markus Himmel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Markus Himmel
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.FiniteProducts
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Kernels
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.NormalMono.Equalizers
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Abelian.Images
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Preadditive.Basic
/-!
# Every NonPreadditiveAbelian category is preadditive
In mathlib, we define an abelian category as a preadditive category with a zero object,
kernels and cokernels, products and coproducts and in which every monomorphism and epimorphism is
normal.
While virtually every interesting abelian category has a natural preadditive structure (which is why
it is included in the definition), preadditivity is not actually needed: Every category that has
all of the other properties appearing in the definition of an abelian category admits a preadditive
structure. This is the construction we carry out in this file.
The proof proceeds in roughly five steps:
1. Prove some results (for example that all equalizers exist) that would be trivial if we already
had the preadditive structure but are a bit of work without it.
2. Develop images and coimages to show that every monomorphism is the kernel of its cokernel.
The results of the first two steps are also useful for the "normal" development of abelian
categories, and will be used there.
3. For every object `A`, define a "subtraction" morphism `σ : A ⨯ A ⟶ A` and use it to define
subtraction on morphisms as `f - g := prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
4. Prove a small number of identities about this subtraction from the definition of `σ`.
5. From these identities, prove a large number of other identities that imply that defining
`f + g := f - (0 - g)` indeed gives an abelian group structure on morphisms such that composition
is bilinear.
The construction is non-trivial and it is quite remarkable that this abelian group structure can
be constructed purely from the existence of a few limits and colimits. Even more remarkably,
since abelian categories admit exactly one preadditive structure (see
`subsingletonPreadditiveOfHasBinaryBiproducts`), the construction manages to exactly
reconstruct any natural preadditive structure the category may have.
## References
* [F. Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra 2*][borceux-vol2]
-/
noncomputable section
open CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace CategoryTheory
section
universe v u
variable (C : Type u) [Category.{v} C]
/-- We call a category `NonPreadditiveAbelian` if it has a zero object, kernels, cokernels, binary
products and coproducts, and every monomorphism and every epimorphism is normal. -/
class NonPreadditiveAbelian extends HasZeroMorphisms C, IsNormalMonoCategory C,
IsNormalEpiCategory C where
[has_zero_object : HasZeroObject C]
[has_kernels : HasKernels C]
[has_cokernels : HasCokernels C]
[has_finite_products : HasFiniteProducts C]
[has_finite_coproducts : HasFiniteCoproducts C]
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_zero_object
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_kernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_cokernels
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_products
attribute [instance] NonPreadditiveAbelian.has_finite_coproducts
end
end CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory
universe v u
variable {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [NonPreadditiveAbelian C]
namespace CategoryTheory.NonPreadditiveAbelian
section Factor
variable {P Q : C} (f : P ⟶ Q)
/-- The map `p : P ⟶ image f` is an epimorphism -/
instance : Epi (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
let I := Abelian.image f
let p := Abelian.factorThruImage f
let i := kernel.ι (cokernel.π f)
-- It will suffice to consider some g : I ⟶ R such that p ≫ g = 0 and show that g = 0.
NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
_ fun R (g : I ⟶ R) (hpg : p ≫ g = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := ker g ≫ i is the kernel of some morphism h.
let u := kernel.ι g ≫ i
haveI hu := normalMonoOfMono u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, p factors through the kernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := kernel.lift' g p hpg
have fh : f ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
f ≫ h = (p ≫ i) ≫ h := (Abelian.image.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = ((t ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i) ≫ h := ht ▸ rfl
_ = t ≫ u ≫ h := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = t ≫ 0 := hu.w ▸ rfl
_ = 0 := HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero _ _
-- h factors through the cokernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := cokernel.desc' f h fh
have hih : i ≫ h = 0 :=
calc
i ≫ h = i ≫ cokernel.π f ≫ l := hl ▸ rfl
_ = 0 ≫ l := by rw [← Category.assoc, kernel.condition]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- i factors through u = ker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalMono.lift' u i hih
have hs' : (s ≫ kernel.ι g) ≫ i = 𝟙 I ≫ i := by rw [Category.assoc, hs, Category.id_comp]
haveI : Epi (kernel.ι g) := epi_of_epi_fac ((cancel_mono _).1 hs')
-- ker g is an epimorphism, but ker g ≫ g = 0 = ker g ≫ 0, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_epi_comp _ (kernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruImage [Mono f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruImage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi <| Abelian.factorThruImage f
/-- The canonical morphism `i : coimage f ⟶ Q` is a monomorphism -/
instance : Mono (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
let I := Abelian.coimage f
let i := Abelian.factorThruCoimage f
let p := cokernel.π (kernel.ι f)
NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero _ fun R (g : R ⟶ I) (hgi : g ≫ i = 0) => by
-- Since C is abelian, u := p ≫ coker g is the cokernel of some morphism h.
let u := p ≫ cokernel.π g
haveI hu := normalEpiOfEpi u
let h := hu.g
-- By hypothesis, i factors through the cokernel of g via some t.
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := cokernel.desc' g i hgi
have hf : h ≫ f = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ f = h ≫ p ≫ i := (Abelian.coimage.fac f).symm ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ t := ht ▸ rfl
_ = h ≫ u ≫ t := by simp only [u, Category.assoc]
_ = 0 ≫ t := by rw [← Category.assoc, hu.w]
_ = 0 := zero_comp
-- h factors through the kernel of f via some l.
obtain ⟨l, hl⟩ := kernel.lift' f h hf
have hhp : h ≫ p = 0 :=
calc
h ≫ p = (l ≫ kernel.ι f) ≫ p := hl ▸ rfl
_ = l ≫ 0 := by rw [Category.assoc, cokernel.condition]
_ = 0 := comp_zero
-- p factors through u = coker h via some s.
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := NormalEpi.desc' u p hhp
have hs' : p ≫ cokernel.π g ≫ s = p ≫ 𝟙 I := by rw [← Category.assoc, hs, Category.comp_id]
haveI : Mono (cokernel.π g) := mono_of_mono_fac ((cancel_epi _).1 hs')
-- coker g is a monomorphism, but g ≫ coker g = 0 = 0 ≫ coker g, so g = 0 as required.
exact zero_of_comp_mono _ (cokernel.condition g)
instance isIso_factorThruCoimage [Epi f] : IsIso (Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
end Factor
section CokernelOfKernel
variable {X Y : C} {f : X ⟶ Y}
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, an epi is the cokernel of its kernel. More precisely:
If `f` is an epimorphism and `s` is some limit kernel cone on `f`, then `f` is a cokernel
of `Fork.ι s`. -/
def epiIsCokernelOfKernel [Epi f] (s : Fork f 0) (h : IsLimit s) :
IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ f (KernelFork.condition s)) :=
IsCokernel.cokernelIso _ _
(cokernel.ofIsoComp _ _ (Limits.IsLimit.conePointUniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h)
(ConeMorphism.w (Limits.IsLimit.uniqueUpToIso (limit.isLimit _) h).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruCoimage f) (Abelian.coimage.fac f)
/-- In a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category, a mono is the kernel of its cokernel. More precisely:
If `f` is a monomorphism and `s` is some colimit cokernel cocone on `f`, then `f` is a kernel
of `Cofork.π s`. -/
def monoIsKernelOfCokernel [Mono f] (s : Cofork f 0) (h : IsColimit s) :
IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι f (CokernelCofork.condition s)) :=
IsKernel.isoKernel _ _
(kernel.ofCompIso _ _ (Limits.IsColimit.coconePointUniqueUpToIso h (colimit.isColimit _))
(CoconeMorphism.w (Limits.IsColimit.uniqueUpToIso h <| colimit.isColimit _).hom _))
(asIso <| Abelian.factorThruImage f) (Abelian.image.fac f)
end CokernelOfKernel
section
/-- The composite `A ⟶ A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (Δ A)`, where the first map is `(𝟙 A, 0)` and the second map
is the canonical projection into the cokernel. -/
abbrev r (A : C) : A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) :=
prod.lift (𝟙 A) 0 ≫ cokernel.π (diag A)
instance mono_Δ {A : C} : Mono (diag A) :=
mono_of_mono_fac <| prod.lift_fst _ _
instance mono_r {A : C} : Mono (r A) := by
let hl : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (diag A) (cokernel.condition (diag A))) :=
monoIsKernelOfCokernel _ (colimit.isColimit _)
apply NormalEpiCategory.mono_of_cancel_zero
intro Z x hx
have hxx : (x ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) = 0 := by
rw [Category.assoc, hx]
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := KernelFork.IsLimit.lift' hl _ hxx
rw [KernelFork.ι_ofι] at hy
have hyy : y = 0 := by
erw [← Category.comp_id y, ← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), ← Category.assoc, hy,
Category.assoc, prod.lift_snd, HasZeroMorphisms.comp_zero]
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
rw [← hy, hyy, zero_comp, zero_comp]
instance epi_r {A : C} : Epi (r A) := by
have hlp : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ Limits.prod.snd = 0 := prod.lift_snd _ _
let hp1 : IsLimit (KernelFork.ofι (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) hlp) := by
refine Fork.IsLimit.mk _ (fun s => Fork.ι s ≫ Limits.prod.fst) ?_ ?_
· intro s
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
· intro s m h
haveI : Mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A)) := mono_of_mono_fac (prod.lift_fst _ _)
apply (cancel_mono (prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A))).1
convert h
apply Limits.prod.hom_ext <;> simp
let hp2 : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (Limits.prod.snd : A ⨯ A ⟶ A) hlp) :=
epiIsCokernelOfKernel _ hp1
apply NormalMonoCategory.epi_of_zero_cancel
intro Z z hz
have h : prod.lift (𝟙 A) (0 : A ⟶ A) ≫ cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ z = 0 := by rw [← Category.assoc, hz]
obtain ⟨t, ht⟩ := CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' hp2 _ h
rw [CokernelCofork.π_ofπ] at ht
have htt : t = 0 := by
rw [← Category.id_comp t]
change 𝟙 A ≫ t = 0
rw [← Limits.prod.lift_snd (𝟙 A) (𝟙 A), Category.assoc, ht, ← Category.assoc,
cokernel.condition, zero_comp]
apply (cancel_epi (cokernel.π (diag A))).1
rw [← ht, htt, comp_zero, comp_zero]
instance isIso_r {A : C} : IsIso (r A) :=
isIso_of_mono_of_epi _
/-- The composite `A ⨯ A ⟶ cokernel (diag A) ⟶ A` given by the natural projection into the cokernel
followed by the inverse of `r`. In the category of modules, using the normal kernels and
cokernels, this map is equal to the map `(a, b) ↦ a - b`, hence the name `σ` for
"subtraction". -/
abbrev σ {A : C} : A ⨯ A ⟶ A :=
cokernel.π (diag A) ≫ inv (r A)
end
@[reassoc]
theorem diag_σ {X : C} : diag X ≫ σ = 0 := by rw [cokernel.condition_assoc, zero_comp]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem lift_σ {X : C} : prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ = 𝟙 X := by rw [← Category.assoc, IsIso.hom_inv_id]
@[reassoc]
theorem lift_map {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 := by simp
/-- σ is a cokernel of Δ X. -/
def isColimitσ {X : C} : IsColimit (CokernelCofork.ofπ (σ : X ⨯ X ⟶ X) diag_σ) :=
cokernel.cokernelIso _ σ (asIso (r X)).symm (by rw [Iso.symm_hom, asIso_inv])
/-- This is the key identity satisfied by `σ`. -/
theorem σ_comp {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) : σ ≫ f = Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by
obtain ⟨g, hg⟩ :=
CokernelCofork.IsColimit.desc' isColimitσ (Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ) (by
rw [prod.diag_map_assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero])
suffices hfg : f = g by rw [← hg, Cofork.π_ofπ, hfg]
calc
f = f ≫ prod.lift (𝟙 Y) 0 ≫ σ := by rw [lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ Limits.prod.map f f ≫ σ := by rw [lift_map_assoc]
_ = prod.lift (𝟙 X) 0 ≫ σ ≫ g := by rw [← hg, CokernelCofork.π_ofπ]
_ = g := by rw [← Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.id_comp]
section
-- We write `f - g` for `prod.lift f g ≫ σ`.
/-- Subtraction of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasSub {X Y : C} : Sub (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => prod.lift f g ≫ σ⟩
attribute [local instance] hasSub
-- We write `-f` for `0 - f`.
/-- Negation of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasNeg {X Y : C} : Neg (X ⟶ Y) where
neg := fun f => 0 - f
attribute [local instance] hasNeg
-- We write `f + g` for `f - (-g)`.
/-- Addition of morphisms in a `NonPreadditiveAbelian` category. -/
def hasAdd {X Y : C} : Add (X ⟶ Y) :=
⟨fun f g => f - -g⟩
attribute [local instance] hasAdd
theorem sub_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a - b = prod.lift a b ≫ σ := rfl
theorem add_def {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = a - -b := rfl
theorem neg_def {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a = 0 - a := rfl
theorem sub_zero {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - 0 = a := by
rw [sub_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; congr; rw [← Category.comp_id a]
case a.g => rw [show 0 = a ≫ (0 : Y ⟶ Y) by simp]
rw [← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, lift_σ, Category.comp_id]
theorem sub_self {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a - a = 0 := by
rw [sub_def, ← Category.comp_id a, ← prod.comp_lift, Category.assoc, diag_σ, comp_zero]
theorem lift_sub_lift {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) :
prod.lift a b - prod.lift c d = prod.lift (a - c) (b - d) := by
simp only [sub_def]
ext
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst, prod.lift_fst]
· rw [Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd, prod.lift_snd]
theorem sub_sub_sub {X Y : C} (a b c d : X ⟶ Y) : a - c - (b - d) = a - b - (c - d) := by
rw [sub_def, ← lift_sub_lift, sub_def, Category.assoc, σ_comp, prod.lift_map_assoc]; rfl
theorem neg_sub {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -a - b = -b - a := by
conv_lhs => rw [neg_def, ← sub_zero b, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, ← neg_def]
theorem neg_neg {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : - -a = a := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [← sub_self a]
rw [sub_sub_sub, sub_zero, sub_self, sub_zero]
theorem add_comm {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + b = b + a := by
rw [add_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← neg_neg a]
rw [neg_def, neg_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub]
conv_lhs =>
congr
next => skip
rw [← neg_def, neg_sub]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, ← neg_def, neg_neg b, neg_def]
theorem add_neg {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : a + -b = a - b := by rw [add_def, neg_neg]
theorem add_neg_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : a + -a = 0 := by rw [add_neg, sub_self]
theorem neg_add_cancel {X Y : C} (a : X ⟶ Y) : -a + a = 0 := by rw [add_comm, add_neg_cancel]
theorem neg_sub' {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -(a - b) = -a + b := by
rw [neg_def, neg_def]
conv_lhs => rw [← sub_self (0 : X ⟶ Y)]
rw [sub_sub_sub, add_def, neg_def]
theorem neg_add {X Y : C} (a b : X ⟶ Y) : -(a + b) = -a - b := by rw [add_def, neg_sub', add_neg]
theorem sub_add {X Y : C} (a b c : X ⟶ Y) : a - b + c = a - (b - c) := by
rw [add_def, neg_def, sub_sub_sub, sub_zero]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Abelian/NonPreadditive.lean | 378 | 382 | theorem add_assoc {X Y : C} (a b c : X ⟶ Y) : a + b + c = a + (b + c) := by | conv_lhs =>
congr; rw [add_def]
rw [sub_add, ← add_neg, neg_sub', neg_neg] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.NatInt
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Abelianization
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.FreeGroup.Basic
/-!
# Free abelian groups
The free abelian group on a type `α`, defined as the abelianisation of
the free group on `α`.
The free abelian group on `α` can be abstractly defined as the left adjoint of the
forgetful functor from abelian groups to types. Alternatively, one could define
it as the functions `α → ℤ` which send all but finitely many `(a : α)` to `0`,
under pointwise addition. In this file, it is defined as the abelianisation
of the free group on `α`. All the constructions and theorems required to show
the adjointness of the construction and the forgetful functor are proved in this
file, but the category-theoretic adjunction statement is in
`Algebra.Category.Group.Adjunctions`.
## Main definitions
Here we use the following variables: `(α β : Type*) (A : Type*) [AddCommGroup A]`
* `FreeAbelianGroup α` : the free abelian group on a type `α`. As an abelian
group it is `α →₀ ℤ`, the functions from `α` to `ℤ` such that all but finitely
many elements get mapped to zero, however this is not how it is implemented.
* `lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` : the group homomorphism induced
by the map `f : α → A`.
* `map (f : α → β) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` : functoriality
of `FreeAbelianGroup`.
* `instance [Monoid α] : Semigroup (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
* `instance [CommMonoid α] : CommRing (FreeAbelianGroup α)`
It has been suggested that we would be better off refactoring this file
and using `Finsupp` instead.
## Implementation issues
The definition is `def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u := Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α`.
Chris Hughes has suggested that this all be rewritten in terms of `Finsupp`.
Johan Commelin has written all the API relating the definition to `Finsupp`
in the lean-liquid repo.
The lemmas `map_pure`, `map_of`, `map_zero`, `map_add`, `map_neg` and `map_sub`
are proved about the `Functor.map` `<$>` construction, and need `α` and `β` to
be in the same universe. But
`FreeAbelianGroup.map (f : α → β)` is defined to be the `AddGroup`
homomorphism `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` (with `α` and `β` now
allowed to be in different universes), so `(map f).map_add`
etc can be used to prove that `FreeAbelianGroup.map` preserves addition. The
functions `map_id`, `map_id_apply`, `map_comp`, `map_comp_apply` and `map_of_apply`
are about `FreeAbelianGroup.map`.
-/
universe u v
variable (α : Type u)
/--
If `α` is a type, then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is the free abelian group generated by `α`.
This is an abelian group equipped with a function
`FreeAbelianGroup.of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α` which has the following universal property:
if `G` is any abelian group, and `f : α → G` is any function, then this function is
the composite of `FreeAbelianGroup.of` and a unique group homomorphism
`FreeAbelianGroup.lift f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ G`.
A typical element of `FreeAbelianGroup α` is a formal sum of
elements of `α` and their formal inverses.
For example if `x` and `y` are terms of type `α` then `x + x + x - y` is a
"typical" element of `FreeAbelianGroup α`. In particular if `α` is empty
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to the trivial group, and if `α` has one term
then `FreeAbelianGroup α` is isomorphic to `ℤ`.
One can think of `FreeAbelianGroup α` as the functions `α →₀ ℤ` with finite support,
and addition given pointwise.
TODO: rename to `FreeAddCommGroup` and introduce a multiplicative version
-/
def FreeAbelianGroup : Type u :=
Additive <| Abelianization <| FreeGroup α
-- FIXME: this is super broken, because the functions have type `Additive .. → ..`
-- instead of `FreeAbelianGroup α → ..` and those are not defeq!
instance FreeAbelianGroup.addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
@Additive.addCommGroup _ <| Abelianization.commGroup _
instance : Inhabited (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance [IsEmpty α] : Unique (FreeAbelianGroup α) := by unfold FreeAbelianGroup; infer_instance
variable {α}
namespace FreeAbelianGroup
/-- The canonical map from `α` to `FreeAbelianGroup α`. -/
def of (x : α) : FreeAbelianGroup α :=
Additive.ofMul <| Abelianization.of <| FreeGroup.of x
/-- The map `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ A` induced by a map of types `α → A`. -/
def lift {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] : (α → β) ≃ (FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) :=
(@FreeGroup.lift _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans <|
(@Abelianization.lift _ _ (Multiplicative β) _).trans MonoidHom.toAdditive
namespace lift
variable {β : Type v} [AddCommGroup β] (f : α → β)
open FreeAbelianGroup
-- Porting note: needed to add `(β := Multiplicative β)` and `using 1`.
@[simp]
protected theorem of (x : α) : lift f (of x) = f x := by
convert Abelianization.lift.of
(FreeGroup.lift f (β := Multiplicative β)) (FreeGroup.of x) using 1
exact (FreeGroup.lift.of (β := Multiplicative β)).symm
protected theorem unique (g : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (hg : ∀ x, g (of x) = f x) {x} :
g x = lift f x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun (lift.symm_apply_eq.mp (funext hg : g ∘ of = f)) _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext high]
protected theorem ext (g h : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ β) (H : ∀ x, g (of x) = h (of x)) : g = h :=
lift.symm.injective <| funext H
theorem map_hom {α β γ} [AddCommGroup β] [AddCommGroup γ] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) (f : α → β)
(g : β →+ γ) : g (lift f a) = lift (g ∘ f) a := by
show (g.comp (lift f)) a = lift (g ∘ f) a
apply lift.unique
intro a
show g ((lift f) (of a)) = g (f a)
simp only [(· ∘ ·), lift.of]
end lift
section
open scoped Classical in
theorem of_injective : Function.Injective (of : α → FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
fun x y hoxy ↦ Classical.by_contradiction fun hxy : x ≠ y ↦
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift fun z ↦ if x = z then (1 : ℤ) else 0
have hfx1 : f (of x) = 1 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_pos rfl
have hfy1 : f (of y) = 1 := hoxy ▸ hfx1
have hfy0 : f (of y) = 0 := (lift.of _ _).trans <| if_neg hxy
one_ne_zero <| hfy1.symm.trans hfy0
@[simp]
theorem of_ne_zero (x : α) : of x ≠ 0 := by
intro h
let f : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ ℤ := lift 1
have hfx : f (of x) = 1 := lift.of _ _
have hf0 : f (of x) = 0 := by rw [h, map_zero]
exact one_ne_zero <| hfx.symm.trans hf0
@[simp]
theorem zero_ne_of (x : α) : 0 ≠ of x := of_ne_zero _ |>.symm
instance [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (FreeAbelianGroup α) where
exists_pair_ne := let ⟨x⟩ := ‹Nonempty α›; ⟨0, of x, zero_ne_of _⟩
end
attribute [local instance] QuotientGroup.leftRel
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {C : FreeAbelianGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeAbelianGroup α) (C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x, C <| of x) (Cn : ∀ x, C (of x) → C (-of x)) (Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) :
C z :=
Quotient.inductionOn' z fun x ↦
Quot.inductionOn x fun L ↦
List.recOn L C0 fun ⟨x, b⟩ _ ih ↦ Bool.recOn b (Cp _ _ (Cn _ (C1 x)) ih) (Cp _ _ (C1 x) ih)
theorem lift.add' {α β} [AddCommGroup β] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) (f g : α → β) :
lift (f + g) a = lift f a + lift g a := by
refine FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on a ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· simp only [(lift _).map_zero, zero_add]
· intro x
simp only [lift.of, Pi.add_apply]
· intro x _
simp only [map_neg, lift.of, Pi.add_apply, neg_add]
· intro x y hx hy
simp only [(lift _).map_add, hx, hy, add_add_add_comm]
/-- If `g : FreeAbelianGroup X` and `A` is an abelian group then `liftAddGroupHom g`
is the additive group homomorphism sending a function `X → A` to the term of type `A`
corresponding to the evaluation of the induced map `FreeAbelianGroup X → A` at `g`. -/
@[simps!]
def liftAddGroupHom {α} (β) [AddCommGroup β] (a : FreeAbelianGroup α) : (α → β) →+ β :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (fun f ↦ lift f a) (lift.add' a)
theorem lift_neg' {β} [AddCommGroup β] (f : α → β) : lift (-f) = -lift f :=
AddMonoidHom.ext fun _ ↦ (liftAddGroupHom _ _ : (α → β) →+ β).map_neg _
section Monad
variable {β : Type u}
instance : Monad FreeAbelianGroup.{u} where
pure α := of α
bind x f := lift f x
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {C : FreeAbelianGroup α → Prop} (z : FreeAbelianGroup α) (C0 : C 0)
(C1 : ∀ x, C <| pure x) (Cn : ∀ x, C (pure x) → C (-pure x))
(Cp : ∀ x y, C x → C y → C (x + y)) : C z :=
FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on z C0 C1 Cn Cp
@[simp]
theorem map_pure (f : α → β) (x : α) : f <$> (pure x : FreeAbelianGroup α) = pure (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
protected theorem map_zero (f : α → β) : f <$> (0 : FreeAbelianGroup α) = 0 :=
(lift (of ∘ f)).map_zero
@[simp]
protected theorem map_add (f : α → β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <$> (x + y) = f <$> x + f <$> y :=
(lift _).map_add _ _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_neg (f : α → β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : f <$> (-x) = -f <$> x :=
map_neg (lift <| of ∘ f) _
@[simp]
protected theorem map_sub (f : α → β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <$> (x - y) = f <$> x - f <$> y :=
map_sub (lift <| of ∘ f) _ _
@[simp]
theorem map_of (f : α → β) (y : α) : f <$> of y = of (f y) :=
rfl
theorem pure_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x) : pure x >>= f = f x :=
lift.of _ _
@[simp]
theorem zero_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) : 0 >>= f = 0 :=
(lift f).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem add_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
x + y >>= f = (x >>= f) + (y >>= f) :=
(lift _).map_add _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : -x >>= f = -(x >>= f) :=
map_neg (lift f) _
@[simp]
theorem sub_bind (f : α → FreeAbelianGroup β) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
x - y >>= f = (x >>= f) - (y >>= f) :=
map_sub (lift f) _ _
@[simp]
theorem pure_seq (f : α → β) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : pure f <*> x = f <$> x :=
pure_bind _ _
@[simp]
theorem zero_seq (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : (0 : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) <*> x = 0 :=
zero_bind _
@[simp]
theorem add_seq (f g : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f + g <*> x = (f <*> x) + (g <*> x) :=
add_bind _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem neg_seq (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : -f <*> x = -(f <*> x) :=
neg_bind _ _
@[simp]
theorem sub_seq (f g : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f - g <*> x = (f <*> x) - (g <*> x) :=
sub_bind _ _ _
/-- If `f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)`, then `f <*>` is an additive morphism
`FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β`. -/
def seqAddGroupHom (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β :=
AddMonoidHom.mk' (f <*> ·) fun x y ↦
show lift (· <$> (x + y)) _ = _ by
simp only [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add]
exact lift.add' f _ _
@[simp]
theorem seq_zero (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) : f <*> 0 = 0 :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_zero
@[simp]
theorem seq_add (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <*> x + y = (f <*> x) + (f <*> y) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_add x y
@[simp]
theorem seq_neg (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : f <*> -x = -(f <*> x) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_neg x
@[simp]
theorem seq_sub (f : FreeAbelianGroup (α → β)) (x y : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
f <*> x - y = (f <*> x) - (f <*> y) :=
(seqAddGroupHom f).map_sub x y
instance : LawfulMonad FreeAbelianGroup.{u} := LawfulMonad.mk'
(id_map := fun x ↦ FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x (FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero id) (map_pure id)
(fun x ih ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, ih])
fun x y ihx ihy ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, ihx, ihy])
(pure_bind := fun x f ↦ pure_bind f x)
(bind_assoc := fun x f g ↦ FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x (by iterate 3 rw [zero_bind])
(fun x ↦ by iterate 2 rw [pure_bind]) (fun x ih ↦ by iterate 3 rw [neg_bind] <;> try rw [ih])
fun x y ihx ihy ↦ by iterate 3 rw [add_bind] <;> try rw [ihx, ihy])
instance : CommApplicative FreeAbelianGroup.{u} where
commutative_prod x y := by
refine FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' x ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, zero_seq, seq_zero]
· intro p
rw [map_pure, pure_seq]
exact FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on' y
(by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, FreeAbelianGroup.map_zero, zero_seq])
(fun q ↦ by rw [map_pure, map_pure, pure_seq, map_pure])
(fun q ih ↦ by rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, neg_seq, ih])
fun y₁ y₂ ih1 ih2 ↦ by
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, add_seq, ih1, ih2]
· intro p ih
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_neg, neg_seq, seq_neg, ih]
· intro x₁ x₂ ih1 ih2
rw [FreeAbelianGroup.map_add, add_seq, seq_add, ih1, ih2]
end Monad
universe w
variable {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
/-- The additive group homomorphism `FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β` induced from a
map `α → β`. -/
def map (f : α → β) : FreeAbelianGroup α →+ FreeAbelianGroup β :=
lift (of ∘ f)
theorem lift_comp {α} {β} {γ} [AddCommGroup γ] (f : α → β) (g : β → γ) (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) :
lift (g ∘ f) x = lift g (map f x) := by
induction x using FreeAbelianGroup.induction_on with
| C0 => simp only [map_zero]
| C1 => simp only [lift.of, map, Function.comp]
| Cn _ h => simp only [h, AddMonoidHom.map_neg]
| Cp _ _ h₁ h₂ => simp only [h₁, h₂, AddMonoidHom.map_add]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/FreeAbelianGroup.lean | 360 | 370 | theorem map_id : map id = AddMonoidHom.id (FreeAbelianGroup α) :=
Eq.symm <|
lift.ext _ _ fun _ ↦ lift.unique of (AddMonoidHom.id _) fun _ ↦ AddMonoidHom.id_apply _ _
theorem map_id_apply (x : FreeAbelianGroup α) : map id x = x := by | rw [map_id]
rfl
theorem map_comp {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} : map (g ∘ f) = (map g).comp (map f) :=
Eq.symm <| lift.ext _ _ fun _ ↦ by simp [map] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jean Lo. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jean Lo, Yaël Dillies, Moritz Doll
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Pi
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.LocallyConvex.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Real.Pointwise
/-!
# Seminorms
This file defines seminorms.
A seminorm is a function to the reals which is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive. They are closely related to convex sets, and a topological vector space is locally
convex if and only if its topology is induced by a family of seminorms.
## Main declarations
For a module over a normed ring:
* `Seminorm`: A function to the reals that is positive-semidefinite, absolutely homogeneous, and
subadditive.
* `normSeminorm 𝕜 E`: The norm on `E` as a seminorm.
## References
* [H. H. Schaefer, *Topological Vector Spaces*][schaefer1966]
## Tags
seminorm, locally convex, LCTVS
-/
assert_not_exists balancedCore
open NormedField Set Filter
open scoped NNReal Pointwise Topology Uniformity
variable {R R' 𝕜 𝕜₂ 𝕜₃ 𝕝 E E₂ E₃ F ι : Type*}
/-- A seminorm on a module over a normed ring is a function to the reals that is positive
semidefinite, positive homogeneous, and subadditive. -/
structure Seminorm (𝕜 : Type*) (E : Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E] [SMul 𝕜 E] extends
AddGroupSeminorm E where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
smul' : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), toFun (a • x) = ‖a‖ * toFun x
attribute [nolint docBlame] Seminorm.toAddGroupSeminorm
/-- `SeminormClass F 𝕜 E` states that `F` is a type of seminorms on the `𝕜`-module `E`.
You should extend this class when you extend `Seminorm`. -/
class SeminormClass (F : Type*) (𝕜 E : outParam Type*) [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddGroup E]
[SMul 𝕜 E] [FunLike F E ℝ] : Prop extends AddGroupSeminormClass F E ℝ where
/-- The seminorm of a scalar multiplication is the product of the absolute value of the scalar
and the original seminorm. -/
map_smul_eq_mul (f : F) (a : 𝕜) (x : E) : f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x
export SeminormClass (map_smul_eq_mul)
section Of
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` on an `AddCommGroup E` that is a module over a
`SeminormedRing 𝕜`. -/
def Seminorm.of [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ)
(add_le : ∀ x y : E, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul : ∀ (a : 𝕜) (x : E), f (a • x) = ‖a‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := f
map_zero' := by rw [← zero_smul 𝕜 (0 : E), smul, norm_zero, zero_mul]
add_le' := add_le
smul' := smul
neg' x := by rw [← neg_one_smul 𝕜, smul, norm_neg, ← smul, one_smul]
/-- Alternative constructor for a `Seminorm` over a normed field `𝕜` that only assumes `f 0 = 0`
and an inequality for the scalar multiplication. -/
def Seminorm.ofSMulLE [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] (f : E → ℝ) (map_zero : f 0 = 0)
(add_le : ∀ x y, f (x + y) ≤ f x + f y) (smul_le : ∀ (r : 𝕜) (x), f (r • x) ≤ ‖r‖ * f x) :
Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
Seminorm.of f add_le fun r x => by
refine le_antisymm (smul_le r x) ?_
by_cases h : r = 0
· simp [h, map_zero]
rw [← mul_le_mul_left (inv_pos.mpr (norm_pos_iff.mpr h))]
rw [inv_mul_cancel_left₀ (norm_ne_zero_iff.mpr h)]
specialize smul_le r⁻¹ (r • x)
rw [norm_inv] at smul_le
convert smul_le
simp [h]
end Of
namespace Seminorm
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E]
instance instFunLike : FunLike (Seminorm 𝕜 E) E ℝ where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_⟩⟩
congr
instance instSeminormClass : SeminormClass (Seminorm 𝕜 E) 𝕜 E where
map_zero f := f.map_zero'
map_add_le_add f := f.add_le'
map_neg_eq_map f := f.neg'
map_smul_eq_mul f := f.smul'
@[ext]
theorem ext {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : ∀ x, (p : E → ℝ) x = q x) : p = q :=
DFunLike.ext p q h
instance instZero : Zero (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨{ AddGroupSeminorm.instZeroAddGroupSeminorm.zero with
smul' := fun _ _ => (mul_zero _).symm }⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ⇑(0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply (x : E) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x = 0 :=
rfl
instance : Inhabited (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
⟨0⟩
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) (r : ℝ)
/-- Any action on `ℝ` which factors through `ℝ≥0` applies to a seminorm. -/
instance instSMul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : SMul R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul r p :=
{ r • p.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => r • p x
smul' := fun _ _ => by
simp only [← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul]
rw [map_smul_eq_mul, mul_left_comm] }
instance [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ] [SMul R' ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0 ℝ] [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ] :
IsScalarTower R R' (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
smul_assoc r a p := ext fun x => smul_assoc r a (p x)
theorem coe_smul [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
⇑(r • p) = r • ⇑p :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
(x : E) : (r • p) x = r • p x :=
rfl
instance instAdd : Add (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
add p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm + q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => p x + q x
smul' := fun a x => by simp only [map_smul_eq_mul, map_smul_eq_mul, mul_add] }
theorem coe_add (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p + q) = p + q :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p + q) x = p x + q x :=
rfl
instance instAddMonoid : AddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instAddCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => by rfl
instance instPartialOrder : PartialOrder (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
PartialOrder.lift _ DFunLike.coe_injective
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.isOrderedCancelAddMonoid _ rfl coe_add fun _ _ => rfl
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
MulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective.mulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
variable (𝕜 E)
/-- `coeFn` as an `AddMonoidHom`. Helper definition for showing that `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a module. -/
@[simps]
def coeFnAddMonoidHom : AddMonoidHom (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) where
toFun := (↑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
theorem coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective : Function.Injective (coeFnAddMonoidHom 𝕜 E) :=
show @Function.Injective (Seminorm 𝕜 E) (E → ℝ) (↑) from DFunLike.coe_injective
variable {𝕜 E}
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0]
[IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] : DistribMulAction R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).distribMulAction _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] :
Module R (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
(coeFnAddMonoidHom_injective 𝕜 E).module R _ (by intros; rfl)
instance instSup : Max (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
max p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊔ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := p ⊔ q
smul' := fun x v =>
(congr_arg₂ max (map_smul_eq_mul p x v) (map_smul_eq_mul q x v)).trans <|
(mul_max_of_nonneg _ _ <| norm_nonneg x).symm }
@[simp]
theorem coe_sup (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : ⇑(p ⊔ q) = (p : E → ℝ) ⊔ (q : E → ℝ) :=
rfl
theorem sup_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊔ q) x = p x ⊔ q x :=
rfl
theorem smul_sup [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊔ q) = r • p ⊔ r • q :=
have real.smul_max : ∀ x y : ℝ, r • max x y = max (r • x) (r • y) := fun x y => by
simpa only [← smul_eq_mul, ← NNReal.smul_def, smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ)] using
mul_max_of_nonneg x y (r • (1 : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0).coe_nonneg
ext fun _ => real.smul_max _ _
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_le_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) ≤ q ↔ p ≤ q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_lt_coe {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : (p : E → ℝ) < q ↔ p < q :=
Iff.rfl
theorem le_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p ≤ q ↔ ∀ x, p x ≤ q x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem lt_def {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} : p < q ↔ p ≤ q ∧ ∃ x, p x < q x :=
@Pi.lt_def _ _ _ p q
instance instSemilatticeSup : SemilatticeSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
Function.Injective.semilatticeSup _ DFunLike.coe_injective coe_sup
end SMul
end AddGroup
section Module
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [SeminormedRing 𝕜₃]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable {σ₂₃ : 𝕜₂ →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₂₃]
variable {σ₁₃ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₃} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₃]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [AddCommGroup E₃]
variable [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂] [Module 𝕜₃ E₃]
variable [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ]
/-- Composition of a seminorm with a linear map is a seminorm. -/
def comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜 E :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm.comp f.toAddMonoidHom with
toFun := fun x => p (f x)
-- Porting note: the `simp only` below used to be part of the `rw`.
-- I'm not sure why this change was needed, and am worried by it!
-- Note: https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/8386 had to change `map_smulₛₗ` to `map_smulₛₗ _`
smul' := fun _ _ => by simp only [map_smulₛₗ _]; rw [map_smul_eq_mul, RingHomIsometric.is_iso] }
theorem coe_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : ⇑(p.comp f) = p ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) : (p.comp f) x = p (f x) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_id (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : p.comp LinearMap.id = p :=
ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem comp_zero (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) : p.comp (0 : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) = 0 :=
ext fun _ => map_zero p
@[simp]
theorem zero_comp (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : (0 : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂).comp f = 0 :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_comp [RingHomCompTriple σ₁₂ σ₂₃ σ₁₃] (p : Seminorm 𝕜₃ E₃) (g : E₂ →ₛₗ[σ₂₃] E₃)
(f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : p.comp (g.comp f) = (p.comp g).comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem add_comp (p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
(p + q).comp f = p.comp f + q.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_add_le (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f g : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) :
p.comp (f + g) ≤ p.comp f + p.comp g := fun _ => map_add_le_add p _ _
theorem smul_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : R) :
(c • p).comp f = c • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
theorem comp_mono {p q : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂} (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (hp : p ≤ q) : p.comp f ≤ q.comp f :=
fun _ => hp _
/-- The composition as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def pullback (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂ →+ Seminorm 𝕜 E where
toFun := fun p => p.comp f
map_zero' := zero_comp f
map_add' := fun p q => add_comp p q f
instance instOrderBot : OrderBot (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
bot := 0
bot_le := apply_nonneg
@[simp]
theorem coe_bot : ⇑(⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem bot_eq_zero : (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) = 0 :=
rfl
theorem smul_le_smul {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {a b : ℝ≥0} (hpq : p ≤ q) (hab : a ≤ b) :
a • p ≤ b • q := by
simp_rw [le_def]
intro x
exact mul_le_mul hab (hpq x) (apply_nonneg p x) (NNReal.coe_nonneg b)
theorem finset_sup_apply (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = ↑(s.sup fun i => ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg (p i) x⟩ : ℝ≥0) := by
induction' s using Finset.cons_induction_on with a s ha ih
· rw [Finset.sup_empty, Finset.sup_empty, coe_bot, _root_.bot_eq_zero, Pi.zero_apply]
norm_cast
· rw [Finset.sup_cons, Finset.sup_cons, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, NNReal.coe_max, NNReal.coe_mk, ih]
theorem exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) {s : Finset ι} (hs : s.Nonempty) (x : E) :
∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.exists_mem_eq_sup s hs (fun i ↦ (⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩ : ℝ≥0)) with ⟨i, hi, hix⟩
rw [finset_sup_apply]
exact ⟨i, hi, congr_arg _ hix⟩
theorem zero_or_exists_apply_eq_finset_sup (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) :
s.sup p x = 0 ∨ ∃ i ∈ s, s.sup p x = p i x := by
rcases Finset.eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl|hs)
· left; rfl
· right; exact exists_apply_eq_finset_sup p hs x
theorem finset_sup_smul (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (C : ℝ≥0) :
s.sup (C • p) = C • s.sup p := by
ext x
rw [smul_apply, finset_sup_apply, finset_sup_apply]
symm
exact congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.mul_finset_sup C s (fun i ↦ ⟨p i x, apply_nonneg _ _⟩))
theorem finset_sup_le_sum (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) : s.sup p ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, p i := by
classical
refine Finset.sup_le_iff.mpr ?_
intro i hi
rw [Finset.sum_eq_sum_diff_singleton_add hi, le_add_iff_nonneg_left]
exact bot_le
theorem finset_sup_apply_le {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x ≤ a) : s.sup p x ≤ a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
exact Finset.sup_le h
theorem le_finset_sup_apply {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {i : ι}
(hi : i ∈ s) : p i x ≤ s.sup p x :=
(Finset.le_sup hi : p i ≤ s.sup p) x
theorem finset_sup_apply_lt {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} {s : Finset ι} {x : E} {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a)
(h : ∀ i, i ∈ s → p i x < a) : s.sup p x < a := by
lift a to ℝ≥0 using ha.le
rw [finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe, Finset.sup_lt_iff]
· exact h
· exact NNReal.coe_pos.mpr ha
theorem norm_sub_map_le_sub (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x y : E) : ‖p x - p y‖ ≤ p (x - y) :=
abs_sub_map_le_sub p x y
end Module
end SeminormedRing
section SeminormedCommRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜] [SeminormedCommRing 𝕜₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
variable [AddCommGroup E] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜 E] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
theorem comp_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) :
p.comp (c • f) = ‖c‖₊ • p.comp f :=
ext fun _ => by
rw [comp_apply, smul_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply, map_smul_eq_mul, NNReal.smul_def, coe_nnnorm,
smul_eq_mul, comp_apply]
theorem comp_smul_apply (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (c : 𝕜₂) (x : E) :
p.comp (c • f) x = ‖c‖ * p (f x) :=
map_smul_eq_mul p _ _
end SeminormedCommRing
section NormedField
variable [NormedField 𝕜] [AddCommGroup E] [Module 𝕜 E] {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {x : E}
/-- Auxiliary lemma to show that the infimum of seminorms is well-defined. -/
theorem bddBelow_range_add : BddBelow (range fun u => p u + q (x - u)) :=
⟨0, by
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
dsimp; positivity⟩
noncomputable instance instInf : Min (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
min p q :=
{ p.toAddGroupSeminorm ⊓ q.toAddGroupSeminorm with
toFun := fun x => ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u)
smul' := by
intro a x
obtain rfl | ha := eq_or_ne a 0
· rw [norm_zero, zero_mul, zero_smul]
refine
ciInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt
(fun i => by positivity)
fun x hx => ⟨0, by rwa [map_zero, sub_zero, map_zero, add_zero]⟩
simp_rw [Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a), mul_add, ← map_smul_eq_mul p, ←
map_smul_eq_mul q, smul_sub]
refine
Function.Surjective.iInf_congr ((a⁻¹ • ·) : E → E)
(fun u => ⟨a • u, inv_smul_smul₀ ha u⟩) fun u => ?_
rw [smul_inv_smul₀ ha] }
@[simp]
theorem inf_apply (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x : E) : (p ⊓ q) x = ⨅ u : E, p u + q (x - u) :=
rfl
noncomputable instance instLattice : Lattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
{ Seminorm.instSemilatticeSup with
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add x <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, add_zero]; rfl
inf_le_right := fun p q x =>
ciInf_le_of_le bddBelow_range_add 0 <| by
simp only [sub_self, map_zero, zero_add, sub_zero]; rfl
le_inf := fun a _ _ hab hac _ =>
le_ciInf fun _ => (le_map_add_map_sub a _ _).trans <| add_le_add (hab _) (hac _) }
theorem smul_inf [SMul R ℝ] [SMul R ℝ≥0] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0 ℝ] (r : R) (p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) :
r • (p ⊓ q) = r • p ⊓ r • q := by
ext
simp_rw [smul_apply, inf_apply, smul_apply, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0 r (_ : ℝ), NNReal.smul_def,
smul_eq_mul, Real.mul_iInf_of_nonneg (NNReal.coe_nonneg _), mul_add]
section Classical
open Classical in
/-- We define the supremum of an arbitrary subset of `Seminorm 𝕜 E` as follows:
* if `s` is `BddAbove` *as a set of functions `E → ℝ`* (that is, if `s` is pointwise bounded
above), we take the pointwise supremum of all elements of `s`, and we prove that it is indeed a
seminorm.
* otherwise, we take the zero seminorm `⊥`.
There are two things worth mentioning here:
* First, it is not trivial at first that `s` being bounded above *by a function* implies
being bounded above *as a seminorm*. We show this in `Seminorm.bddAbove_iff` by using
that the `Sup s` as defined here is then a bounding seminorm for `s`. So it is important to make
the case disjunction on `BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))` and not `BddAbove s`.
* Since the pointwise `Sup` already gives `0` at points where a family of functions is
not bounded above, one could hope that just using the pointwise `Sup` would work here, without the
need for an additional case disjunction. As discussed on Zulip, this doesn't work because this can
give a function which does *not* satisfy the seminorm axioms (typically sub-additivity).
-/
noncomputable instance instSupSet : SupSet (Seminorm 𝕜 E) where
sSup s :=
if h : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) then
{ toFun := ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ)
map_zero' := by
rw [iSup_apply, ← @Real.iSup_const_zero s]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact map_zero i.1
add_le' := fun x y => by
rcases h with ⟨q, hq⟩
obtain rfl | h := s.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp [Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
haveI : Nonempty ↑s := h.coe_sort
simp only [iSup_apply]
refine ciSup_le fun i =>
((i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).add_le' x y).trans <| add_le_add
-- Porting note: `f` is provided to force `Subtype.val` to appear.
-- A type ascription on `_` would have also worked, but would have been more verbose.
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun x) ⟨q x, ?_⟩ i)
(le_ciSup (f := fun i => (Subtype.val i : Seminorm 𝕜 E).toFun y) ⟨q y, ?_⟩ i)
<;> rw [mem_upperBounds, forall_mem_range]
<;> exact fun j => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ j.2) _
neg' := fun x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
congr! 2
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.neg' _
smul' := fun a x => by
simp only [iSup_apply]
rw [← smul_eq_mul,
Real.smul_iSup_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg a) fun i : s => (i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x]
congr!
rename_i _ _ _ i
exact i.1.smul' a x }
else ⊥
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq' {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hs : BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ))) : ↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
congr_arg _ (dif_pos hs)
protected theorem bddAbove_iff {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove s ↔ BddAbove ((↑) '' s : Set (E → ℝ)) :=
⟨fun ⟨q, hq⟩ => ⟨q, forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hp => hq hp⟩, fun H =>
⟨sSup s, fun p hp x => by
dsimp
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' H, iSup_apply]
rcases H with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact
le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq (mem_image_of_mem _ i.2) x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩⟩⟩
protected theorem bddAbove_range_iff {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} :
BddAbove (range p) ↔ ∀ x, BddAbove (range fun i ↦ p i x) := by
rw [Seminorm.bddAbove_iff, ← range_comp, bddAbove_range_pi]; rfl
protected theorem coe_sSup_eq {s : Set <| Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = ⨆ p : s, ((p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) :=
Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq' (Seminorm.bddAbove_iff.mp hs)
protected theorem coe_iSup_eq {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E} (hp : BddAbove (range p)) :
↑(⨆ i, p i) = ⨆ i, ((p i : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : E → ℝ) := by
rw [← sSup_range, Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp]
exact iSup_range' (fun p : Seminorm 𝕜 E => (p : E → ℝ)) p
protected theorem sSup_apply {s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)} (hp : BddAbove s) {x : E} :
(sSup s) x = ⨆ p : s, (p : E → ℝ) x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem iSup_apply {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E}
(hp : BddAbove (range p)) {x : E} : (⨆ i, p i) x = ⨆ i, p i x := by
rw [Seminorm.coe_iSup_eq hp, iSup_apply]
protected theorem sSup_empty : sSup (∅ : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) = ⊥ := by
ext
rw [Seminorm.sSup_apply bddAbove_empty, Real.iSup_of_isEmpty]
rfl
private theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (Seminorm 𝕜 E)) (hs₁ : BddAbove s) (hs₂ : s.Nonempty) :
IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
refine ⟨fun p hp x => ?_, fun p hp x => ?_⟩ <;> haveI : Nonempty ↑s := hs₂.coe_sort <;>
dsimp <;> rw [Seminorm.coe_sSup_eq hs₁, iSup_apply]
· rcases hs₁ with ⟨q, hq⟩
exact le_ciSup ⟨q x, forall_mem_range.mpr fun i : s => hq i.2 x⟩ ⟨p, hp⟩
· exact ciSup_le fun q => hp q.2 x
/-- `Seminorm 𝕜 E` is a conditionally complete lattice.
Note that, while `inf`, `sup` and `sSup` have good definitional properties (corresponding to
the instances given here for `Inf`, `Sup` and `SupSet` respectively), `sInf s` is just
defined as the supremum of the lower bounds of `s`, which is not really useful in practice. If you
need to use `sInf` on seminorms, then you should probably provide a more workable definition first,
but this is unlikely to happen so we keep the "bad" definition for now. -/
noncomputable instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice (Seminorm 𝕜 E) :=
conditionallyCompleteLatticeOfLatticeOfsSup (Seminorm 𝕜 E) Seminorm.isLUB_sSup
end Classical
end NormedField
/-! ### Seminorm ball -/
section SeminormedRing
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜]
section AddCommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup E]
section SMul
variable [SMul 𝕜 E] (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
/-- The ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y` with
`p (y - x) < r`. -/
def ball (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) < r }
/-- The closed ball of radius `r` at `x` with respect to seminorm `p` is the set of elements `y`
with `p (y - x) ≤ r`. -/
def closedBall (x : E) (r : ℝ) :=
{ y : E | p (y - x) ≤ r }
variable {x y : E} {r : ℝ}
@[simp]
theorem mem_ball : y ∈ ball p x r ↔ p (y - x) < r :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_closedBall : y ∈ closedBall p x r ↔ p (y - x) ≤ r :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_ball_self (hr : 0 < r) : x ∈ ball p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_closedBall_self (hr : 0 ≤ r) : x ∈ closedBall p x r := by simp [hr]
theorem mem_ball_zero : y ∈ ball p 0 r ↔ p y < r := by rw [mem_ball, sub_zero]
theorem mem_closedBall_zero : y ∈ closedBall p 0 r ↔ p y ≤ r := by rw [mem_closedBall, sub_zero]
theorem ball_zero_eq : ball p 0 r = { y : E | p y < r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_ball_zero
theorem closedBall_zero_eq : closedBall p 0 r = { y : E | p y ≤ r } :=
Set.ext fun _ => p.mem_closedBall_zero
theorem ball_subset_closedBall (x r) : ball p x r ⊆ closedBall p x r := fun _ h =>
(mem_closedBall _).mpr ((mem_ball _).mp h).le
theorem closedBall_eq_biInter_ball (x r) : closedBall p x r = ⋂ ρ > r, ball p x ρ := by
ext y; simp_rw [mem_closedBall, mem_iInter₂, mem_ball, ← forall_lt_iff_le']
@[simp]
theorem ball_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ := by
rw [Set.eq_univ_iff_forall, ball]
simp [hr]
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_zero' (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : closedBall (0 : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
eq_univ_of_subset (ball_subset_closedBall _ _ _) (ball_zero' x hr)
theorem ball_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).ball x r = p.ball x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_ball, mem_ball, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
lt_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem closedBall_smul (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) {c : NNReal} (hc : 0 < c) (r : ℝ) (x : E) :
(c • p).closedBall x r = p.closedBall x (r / c) := by
ext
rw [mem_closedBall, mem_closedBall, smul_apply, NNReal.smul_def, smul_eq_mul, mul_comm,
le_div_iff₀ (NNReal.coe_pos.mpr hc)]
theorem ball_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (p ⊔ q) e r = ball p e r ∩ ball q e r := by
simp_rw [ball, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_lt_iff]
theorem closedBall_sup (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (q : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
closedBall (p ⊔ q) e r = closedBall p e r ∩ closedBall q e r := by
simp_rw [closedBall, ← Set.setOf_and, coe_sup, Pi.sup_apply, sup_le_iff]
theorem ball_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E) (r : ℝ) :
ball (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => ball (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, ball_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem closedBall_finset_sup' (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (H : s.Nonempty) (e : E)
(r : ℝ) : closedBall (s.sup' H p) e r = s.inf' H fun i => closedBall (p i) e r := by
induction H using Finset.Nonempty.cons_induction with
| singleton => simp
| cons _ _ _ hs ih =>
rw [Finset.sup'_cons hs, Finset.inf'_cons hs, closedBall_sup]
-- Porting note: `rw` can't use `inf_eq_inter` here, but `simp` can?
simp only [inf_eq_inter, ih]
theorem ball_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) : p.ball x r₁ ⊆ p.ball x r₂ :=
fun _ (hx : _ < _) => hx.trans_le h
theorem closedBall_mono {p : Seminorm 𝕜 E} {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (h : r₁ ≤ r₂) :
p.closedBall x r₁ ⊆ p.closedBall x r₂ := fun _ (hx : _ ≤ _) => hx.trans h
theorem ball_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) : p.ball x r ⊆ q.ball x r := fun _ =>
(h _).trans_lt
theorem closedBall_antitone {p q : Seminorm 𝕜 E} (h : q ≤ p) :
p.closedBall x r ⊆ q.closedBall x r := fun _ => (h _).trans
theorem ball_add_ball_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.ball (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.ball (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.ball (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_ball, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem closedBall_add_closedBall_subset (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (r₁ r₂ : ℝ) (x₁ x₂ : E) :
p.closedBall (x₁ : E) r₁ + p.closedBall (x₂ : E) r₂ ⊆ p.closedBall (x₁ + x₂) (r₁ + r₂) := by
rintro x ⟨y₁, hy₁, y₂, hy₂, rfl⟩
rw [mem_closedBall, add_sub_add_comm]
exact (map_add_le_add p _ _).trans (add_le_add hy₁ hy₂)
theorem sub_mem_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.ball y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.ball (x₂ + y) r := by simp_rw [mem_ball, sub_sub]
theorem sub_mem_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) (x₁ x₂ y : E) (r : ℝ) :
x₁ - x₂ ∈ p.closedBall y r ↔ x₁ ∈ p.closedBall (x₂ + y) r := by
simp_rw [mem_closedBall, sub_sub]
/-- The image of a ball under addition with a singleton is another ball. -/
theorem vadd_ball (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.ball y r = p.ball (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_ball x y r
/-- The image of a closed ball under addition with a singleton is another closed ball. -/
theorem vadd_closedBall (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E) : x +ᵥ p.closedBall y r = p.closedBall (x +ᵥ y) r :=
letI := AddGroupSeminorm.toSeminormedAddCommGroup p.toAddGroupSeminorm
Metric.vadd_closedBall x y r
end SMul
section Module
variable [Module 𝕜 E]
variable [SeminormedRing 𝕜₂] [AddCommGroup E₂] [Module 𝕜₂ E₂]
variable {σ₁₂ : 𝕜 →+* 𝕜₂} [RingHomIsometric σ₁₂]
theorem ball_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).ball x r = f ⁻¹' p.ball (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [ball, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
theorem closedBall_comp (p : Seminorm 𝕜₂ E₂) (f : E →ₛₗ[σ₁₂] E₂) (x : E) (r : ℝ) :
(p.comp f).closedBall x r = f ⁻¹' p.closedBall (f x) r := by
ext
simp_rw [closedBall, mem_preimage, comp_apply, Set.mem_setOf_eq, map_sub]
variable (p : Seminorm 𝕜 E)
theorem preimage_metric_ball {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r = { x | p x < r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_ball_zero_iff, Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem preimage_metric_closedBall {r : ℝ} : p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r = { x | p x ≤ r } := by
ext x
simp only [mem_setOf, mem_preimage, mem_closedBall_zero_iff,
Real.norm_of_nonneg (apply_nonneg p _)]
theorem ball_zero_eq_preimage_ball {r : ℝ} : p.ball 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.ball 0 r := by
rw [ball_zero_eq, preimage_metric_ball]
theorem closedBall_zero_eq_preimage_closedBall {r : ℝ} :
p.closedBall 0 r = p ⁻¹' Metric.closedBall 0 r := by
rw [closedBall_zero_eq, preimage_metric_closedBall]
@[simp]
theorem ball_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) : ball (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
ball_zero' x hr
@[simp]
theorem closedBall_bot {r : ℝ} (x : E) (hr : 0 < r) :
closedBall (⊥ : Seminorm 𝕜 E) x r = Set.univ :=
closedBall_zero' x hr
/-- Seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_ball_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (ball p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_ball_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ < r := by rwa [mem_ball_zero] at hy
/-- Closed seminorm-balls at the origin are balanced. -/
theorem balanced_closedBall_zero (r : ℝ) : Balanced 𝕜 (closedBall p 0 r) := by
rintro a ha x ⟨y, hy, hx⟩
rw [mem_closedBall_zero, ← hx, map_smul_eq_mul]
calc
_ ≤ p y := mul_le_of_le_one_left (apply_nonneg p _) ha
_ ≤ r := by rwa [mem_closedBall_zero] at hy
theorem ball_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 < r) : ball (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, ball (p i) x r := by
lift r to NNReal using hr.le
simp_rw [ball, iInter_setOf, finset_sup_apply, NNReal.coe_lt_coe,
Finset.sup_lt_iff (show ⊥ < r from hr), ← NNReal.coe_lt_coe, NNReal.coe_mk]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Seminorm.lean | 796 | 797 | theorem closedBall_finset_sup_eq_iInter (p : ι → Seminorm 𝕜 E) (s : Finset ι) (x : E) {r : ℝ}
(hr : 0 ≤ r) : closedBall (s.sup p) x r = ⋂ i ∈ s, closedBall (p i) x r := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Bolton Bailey. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bolton Bailey, Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Field
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Log
/-!
# Real logarithm base `b`
In this file we define `Real.logb` to be the logarithm of a real number in a given base `b`. We
define this as the division of the natural logarithms of the argument and the base, so that we have
a globally defined function with `logb b 0 = 0`, `logb b (-x) = logb b x` `logb 0 x = 0` and
`logb (-b) x = logb b x`.
We prove some basic properties of this function and its relation to `rpow`.
## Tags
logarithm, continuity
-/
open Set Filter Function
open Topology
noncomputable section
namespace Real
variable {b x y : ℝ}
/-- The real logarithm in a given base. As with the natural logarithm, we define `logb b x` to
be `logb b |x|` for `x < 0`, and `0` for `x = 0`. -/
@[pp_nodot]
noncomputable def logb (b x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
log x / log b
theorem log_div_log : log x / log b = logb b x :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem logb_zero : logb b 0 = 0 := by simp [logb]
@[simp]
theorem logb_one : logb b 1 = 0 := by simp [logb]
theorem logb_zero_left : logb 0 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_zero, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_zero_left_eq_zero : logb 0 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_zero_left, Pi.zero_apply]
theorem logb_one_left : logb 1 x = 0 := by simp only [← log_div_log, log_one, div_zero]
@[simp] theorem logb_one_left_eq_zero : logb 1 = 0 := by ext; rw [logb_one_left, Pi.zero_apply]
@[simp]
lemma logb_self_eq_one (hb : 1 < b) : logb b b = 1 :=
div_self (log_pos hb).ne'
lemma logb_self_eq_one_iff : logb b b = 1 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 1 ∧ b ≠ -1 :=
Iff.trans ⟨fun h h' => by simp [logb, h'] at h, div_self⟩ log_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem logb_abs (x : ℝ) : logb b |x| = logb b x := by rw [logb, logb, log_abs]
@[simp]
theorem logb_neg_eq_logb (x : ℝ) : logb b (-x) = logb b x := by
rw [← logb_abs x, ← logb_abs (-x), abs_neg]
theorem logb_mul (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x * y) = logb b x + logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_mul hx hy, add_div]
theorem logb_div (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) : logb b (x / y) = logb b x - logb b y := by
simp_rw [logb, log_div hx hy, sub_div]
@[simp]
theorem logb_inv (x : ℝ) : logb b x⁻¹ = -logb b x := by simp [logb, neg_div]
theorem inv_logb (a b : ℝ) : (logb a b)⁻¹ = logb b a := by simp_rw [logb, inv_div]
theorem inv_logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a * b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_mul h₁ h₂
theorem inv_logb_div_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
(logb (a / b) c)⁻¹ = (logb a c)⁻¹ - (logb b c)⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [inv_logb]; exact logb_div h₁ h₂
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Log/Base.lean | 92 | 94 | theorem logb_mul_base {a b : ℝ} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : b ≠ 0) (c : ℝ) :
logb (a * b) c = ((logb a c)⁻¹ + (logb b c)⁻¹)⁻¹ := by | rw [← inv_logb_mul_base h₁ h₂ c, inv_inv] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Benjamin Davidson
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.NegOnePow
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Periodic
import Mathlib.Algebra.QuadraticDiscriminant
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Exp
/-!
# Trigonometric functions
## Main definitions
This file contains the definition of `π`.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Inverse` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Arctan` for the inverse trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Arg` and
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Complex.Log` for the complex argument function
and the complex logarithm.
## Main statements
Many basic inequalities on the real trigonometric functions are established.
The continuity of the usual trigonometric functions is proved.
Several facts about the real trigonometric functions have the proofs deferred to
`Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Complex`,
as they are most easily proved by appealing to the corresponding fact for
complex trigonometric functions.
See also `Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Trigonometric.Chebyshev` for the multiple angle formulas
in terms of Chebyshev polynomials.
## Tags
sin, cos, tan, angle
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Filter Set
namespace Complex
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (-z * I) - exp (z * I)) * I / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp (z * I) + exp (-z * I)) / 2
fun_prop
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s : Set ℂ} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z - exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh := by
change Continuous fun z => (exp z + exp (-z)) / 2
fun_prop
end Complex
namespace Real
variable {x y z : ℝ}
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sin : Continuous sin :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sin.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_sin {s} : ContinuousOn sin s :=
continuous_sin.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cos : Continuous cos :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cos.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousOn_cos {s} : ContinuousOn cos s :=
continuous_cos.continuousOn
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_sinh : Continuous sinh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_sinh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
@[continuity, fun_prop]
theorem continuous_cosh : Continuous cosh :=
Complex.continuous_re.comp (Complex.continuous_cosh.comp Complex.continuous_ofReal)
end Real
namespace Real
theorem exists_cos_eq_zero : 0 ∈ cos '' Icc (1 : ℝ) 2 :=
intermediate_value_Icc' (by norm_num) continuousOn_cos
⟨le_of_lt cos_two_neg, le_of_lt cos_one_pos⟩
/-- The number π = 3.14159265... Defined here using choice as twice a zero of cos in [1,2], from
which one can derive all its properties. For explicit bounds on π, see `Data.Real.Pi.Bounds`.
Denoted `π`, once the `Real` namespace is opened. -/
protected noncomputable def pi : ℝ :=
2 * Classical.choose exists_cos_eq_zero
@[inherit_doc]
scoped notation "π" => Real.pi
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).2
theorem one_le_pi_div_two : (1 : ℝ) ≤ π / 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.1
theorem pi_div_two_le_two : π / 2 ≤ 2 := by
rw [Real.pi, mul_div_cancel_left₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
exact (Classical.choose_spec exists_cos_eq_zero).1.2
theorem two_le_pi : (2 : ℝ) ≤ π :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(by rw [div_self (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]; exact one_le_pi_div_two)
theorem pi_le_four : π ≤ 4 :=
(div_le_div_iff_of_pos_right (show (0 : ℝ) < 2 by norm_num)).1
(calc
π / 2 ≤ 2 := pi_div_two_le_two
_ = 4 / 2 := by norm_num)
@[bound]
theorem pi_pos : 0 < π :=
lt_of_lt_of_le (by norm_num) two_le_pi
@[bound]
theorem pi_nonneg : 0 ≤ π :=
pi_pos.le
theorem pi_ne_zero : π ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
theorem pi_div_two_pos : 0 < π / 2 :=
half_pos pi_pos
theorem two_pi_pos : 0 < 2 * π := by linarith [pi_pos]
end Real
namespace Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
open Lean.Meta Qq
/-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `π` is always positive. -/
@[positivity Real.pi]
def evalRealPi : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Real.pi) =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Real.pi_pos))
| _, _, _ => throwError "not Real.pi"
end Mathlib.Meta.Positivity
namespace NNReal
open Real
open Real NNReal
/-- `π` considered as a nonnegative real. -/
noncomputable def pi : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨π, Real.pi_pos.le⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_real_pi : (pi : ℝ) = π :=
rfl
theorem pi_pos : 0 < pi := mod_cast Real.pi_pos
theorem pi_ne_zero : pi ≠ 0 :=
pi_pos.ne'
end NNReal
namespace Real
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), two_mul, add_div, sin_add, cos_pi_div_two]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by
rw [← mul_div_cancel_left₀ π (two_ne_zero' ℝ), mul_div_assoc, cos_two_mul, cos_pi_div_two]
norm_num
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg, Int.cast_negOnePow] using sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π - x) = -((-1) ^ n * sin x) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, mul_neg] using sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
@[simp]
theorem abs_cos_int_mul_pi (k : ℤ) : |cos (k * π)| = 1 := by
simp [abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq]
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℝ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
@[simp]
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.add_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.add_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * π) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
n.cast_negOnePow ℝ ▸ cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * π - x) = (-1) ^ n * cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).add_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.nat_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - π) = -1 := by
simpa only [cos_zero] using (cos_periodic.int_mul n).sub_antiperiod_eq cos_antiperiodic
theorem sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π) : 0 < sin x :=
if hx2 : x ≤ 2 then sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two h0x hx2
else
have : (2 : ℝ) + 2 = 4 := by norm_num
have : π - x ≤ 2 :=
sub_le_iff_le_add.2 (le_trans pi_le_four (this ▸ add_le_add_left (le_of_not_ge hx2) _))
sin_pi_sub x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_le_two (sub_pos.2 hxp) this
theorem sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo 0 π) : 0 < sin x :=
sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi hx.1 hx.2
theorem sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc 0 π) : 0 ≤ sin x := by
rw [← closure_Ioo pi_ne_zero.symm] at hx
exact
closure_lt_subset_le continuous_const continuous_sin
(closure_mono (fun y => sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo) hx)
theorem sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π) : 0 ≤ sin x :=
sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨h0x, hxp⟩
theorem sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -π < x) : sin x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (neg_pos.2 hx0) (neg_lt.1 hpx)
theorem sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -π ≤ x) : sin x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| sin_neg x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (neg_nonneg.2 hx0) (neg_le.1 hpx)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
have : sin (π / 2) = 1 ∨ sin (π / 2) = -1 := by
simpa [sq, mul_self_eq_one_iff] using sin_sq_add_cos_sq (π / 2)
this.resolve_right fun h =>
show ¬(0 : ℝ) < -1 by norm_num <|
h ▸ sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi pi_div_two_pos (half_lt_self pi_pos)
theorem sin_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x + π / 2) = cos x := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : sin (x - π / 2) = -cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem sin_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : sin (π / 2 - x) = cos x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add]
theorem cos_add_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x + π / 2) = -sin x := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_sub_pi_div_two (x : ℝ) : cos (x - π / 2) = sin x := by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, cos_add]
theorem cos_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : cos (π / 2 - x) = sin x := by
rw [← cos_neg, neg_sub, cos_sub_pi_div_two]
theorem cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 < cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc {x : ℝ} (hx : x ∈ Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : 0 ≤ cos x :=
sin_add_pi_div_two x ▸ sin_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith [hx.1], by linarith [hx.2]⟩
theorem cos_nonneg_of_neg_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
0 ≤ cos x :=
cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩
theorem cos_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 < x) (hx₂ : x < π + π / 2) :
cos x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem cos_nonpos_of_pi_div_two_le_of_le {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : π / 2 ≤ x) (hx₂ : x ≤ π + π / 2) :
cos x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 <| cos_pi_sub x ▸ cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨by linarith, by linarith⟩
theorem sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π) :
sin x = √(1 - cos x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_eq_sqrt_one_sub_cos_sq, abs_of_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hl hu)]
theorem cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq {x : ℝ} (hl : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hu : x ≤ π / 2) :
cos x = √(1 - sin x ^ 2) := by
rw [← abs_cos_eq_sqrt_one_sub_sin_sq, abs_of_nonneg (cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc ⟨hl, hu⟩)]
lemma cos_half {x : ℝ} (hl : -π ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ π) : cos (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 + cos x) / 2) := by
have : 0 ≤ cos (x / 2) := cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith
rw [← sqrt_sq this, cos_sq, add_div, two_mul, add_halves]
lemma abs_sin_half (x : ℝ) : |sin (x / 2)| = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← sqrt_sq_eq_abs, sin_sq_eq_half_sub, two_mul, add_halves, sub_div]
lemma sin_half_eq_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : 0 ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 2 * π) :
sin (x / 2) = sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonneg]
apply sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi <;> linarith
lemma sin_half_eq_neg_sqrt {x : ℝ} (hl : -(2 * π) ≤ x) (hr : x ≤ 0) :
sin (x / 2) = -sqrt ((1 - cos x) / 2) := by
rw [← abs_sin_half, abs_of_nonpos, neg_neg]
apply sin_nonpos_of_nonnpos_of_neg_pi_le <;> linarith
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -π < x) (hx₂ : x < π) : sin x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
contrapose! h
cases h.lt_or_lt with
| inl h0 => exact (sin_neg_of_neg_of_neg_pi_lt h0 hx₁).ne
| inr h0 => exact (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0 hx₂).ne',
fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π = x :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨⌊x / π⌋,
le_antisymm (sub_nonneg.1 (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_nonneg _ pi_pos))
(sub_nonpos.1 <|
le_of_not_gt fun h₃ =>
(sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h₃ (Int.sub_floor_div_mul_lt _ pi_pos)).ne
(by simp [sub_eq_add_neg, sin_add, h, sin_int_mul_pi]))⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ sin_int_mul_pi _⟩
theorem sin_ne_zero_iff {x : ℝ} : sin x ≠ 0 ↔ ∀ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * π ≠ x := by
rw [← not_exists, not_iff_not, sin_eq_zero_iff]
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {x : ℝ} : sin x = 0 ↔ cos x = 1 ∨ cos x = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq x, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff (x : ℝ) : cos x = 1 ↔ ∃ n : ℤ, (n : ℝ) * (2 * π) = x :=
⟨fun h =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := sin_eq_zero_iff.1 (sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq.2 (Or.inl h))
⟨n / 2,
(Int.emod_two_eq_zero_or_one n).elim
(fun hn0 => by
rwa [← mul_assoc, ← @Int.cast_two ℝ, ← Int.cast_mul,
Int.ediv_mul_cancel (Int.dvd_iff_emod_eq_zero.2 hn0)])
fun hn1 => by
rw [← Int.emod_add_ediv n 2, hn1, Int.cast_add, Int.cast_one, add_mul, one_mul, add_comm,
mul_comm (2 : ℤ), Int.cast_mul, mul_assoc, Int.cast_two] at hn
rw [← hn, cos_int_mul_two_pi_add_pi] at h
exact absurd h (by norm_num)⟩,
fun ⟨_, hn⟩ => hn ▸ cos_int_mul_two_pi _⟩
theorem cos_eq_one_iff_of_lt_of_lt {x : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(2 * π) < x) (hx₂ : x < 2 * π) :
cos x = 1 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases (cos_eq_one_iff _).1 h with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₂
rw [neg_lt, neg_mul_eq_neg_mul, mul_lt_iff_lt_one_left two_pi_pos] at hx₁
norm_cast at hx₁ hx₂
obtain rfl : n = 0 := le_antisymm (by omega) (by omega)
simp, fun h => by simp [h]⟩
theorem sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : sin x < sin y := by
rw [← sub_pos, sin_sub_sin]
have : 0 < sin ((y - x) / 2) := by apply sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi <;> linarith
have : 0 < cos ((y + x) / 2) := by refine cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨?_, ?_⟩ <;> linarith
positivity
theorem strictMonoOn_sin : StrictMonoOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x < y) :
cos y < cos x := by
rw [← sin_pi_div_two_sub, ← sin_pi_div_two_sub]
apply sin_lt_sin_of_lt_of_le_pi_div_two <;> linarith
theorem cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : cos y < cos x :=
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx₁ (hy₂.trans (by linarith)) hxy
theorem strictAntiOn_cos : StrictAntiOn cos (Icc 0 π) := fun _ hx _ hy hxy =>
cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi hx.1 hy.2 hxy
theorem cos_le_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π) (hxy : x ≤ y) :
cos y ≤ cos x :=
(strictAntiOn_cos.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem sin_le_sin_of_le_of_le_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) ≤ x) (hy₂ : y ≤ π / 2)
(hxy : x ≤ y) : sin x ≤ sin y :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.le_iff_le ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩).2 hxy
theorem injOn_sin : InjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_sin.injOn
theorem injOn_cos : InjOn cos (Icc 0 π) :=
strictAntiOn_cos.injOn
theorem surjOn_sin : SurjOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [sin_neg, sin_pi_div_two] using
intermediate_value_Icc (neg_le_self pi_div_two_pos.le) continuous_sin.continuousOn
theorem surjOn_cos : SurjOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) := by
simpa only [cos_zero, cos_pi] using intermediate_value_Icc' pi_pos.le continuous_cos.continuousOn
theorem sin_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : sin x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_sin x, sin_le_one x⟩
theorem cos_mem_Icc (x : ℝ) : cos x ∈ Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
⟨neg_one_le_cos x, cos_le_one x⟩
theorem mapsTo_sin (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo sin s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => sin_mem_Icc x
theorem mapsTo_cos (s : Set ℝ) : MapsTo cos s (Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1) := fun x _ => cos_mem_Icc x
theorem bijOn_sin : BijOn sin (Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_sin _, injOn_sin, surjOn_sin⟩
theorem bijOn_cos : BijOn cos (Icc 0 π) (Icc (-1) 1) :=
⟨mapsTo_cos _, injOn_cos, surjOn_cos⟩
@[simp]
theorem range_cos : range cos = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 cos_mem_Icc) surjOn_cos.subset_range
@[simp]
theorem range_sin : range sin = (Icc (-1) 1 : Set ℝ) :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 sin_mem_Icc) surjOn_sin.subset_range
theorem range_cos_infinite : (range Real.cos).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_cos]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
theorem range_sin_infinite : (range Real.sin).Infinite := by
rw [Real.range_sin]
exact Icc_infinite (by norm_num)
section CosDivSq
variable (x : ℝ)
/-- the series `sqrtTwoAddSeries x n` is `sqrt(2 + sqrt(2 + ... ))` with `n` square roots,
starting with `x`. We define it here because `cos (pi / 2 ^ (n+1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2`
-/
@[simp]
noncomputable def sqrtTwoAddSeries (x : ℝ) : ℕ → ℝ
| 0 => x
| n + 1 => √(2 + sqrtTwoAddSeries x n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero : sqrtTwoAddSeries x 0 = x := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_one : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 1 = √2 := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_two : sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 2 = √(2 + √2) := by simp
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n
| 0 => le_refl 0
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg {x : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ x) : ∀ n : ℕ, 0 ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries x n
| 0 => h
| _ + 1 => sqrt_nonneg _
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two : ∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n < 2
| 0 => by norm_num
| n + 1 => by
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ (sqrt_sq zero_lt_two.le).le
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrt_lt_sqrt_iff, ← lt_sub_iff_add_lt']
· refine (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two n).trans_le ?_
norm_num
· exact add_nonneg zero_le_two (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg n)
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ (x : ℝ) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x (n + 1) = sqrtTwoAddSeries (√(2 + x)) n
| 0 => rfl
| n + 1 => by rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries_succ _ _, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
theorem sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left {x y : ℝ} (h : x ≤ y) :
∀ n : ℕ, sqrtTwoAddSeries x n ≤ sqrtTwoAddSeries y n
| 0 => h
| n + 1 => by
rw [sqrtTwoAddSeries, sqrtTwoAddSeries]
exact sqrt_le_sqrt (add_le_add_left (sqrtTwoAddSeries_monotone_left h _) _)
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_over_two_pow : ∀ n : ℕ, cos (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) = sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => by
have A : (1 : ℝ) < 2 ^ (n + 1) := one_lt_pow₀ one_lt_two n.succ_ne_zero
have B : π / 2 ^ (n + 1) < π := div_lt_self pi_pos A
have C : 0 < π / 2 ^ (n + 1) := by positivity
rw [pow_succ, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_over_two_pow n, sqrtTwoAddSeries,
add_div_eq_mul_add_div, one_mul, ← div_mul_eq_div_div, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;>
linarith [sqrtTwoAddSeries_nonneg le_rfl n]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 1)) ^ 2 = 1 - (sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 2) ^ 2 := by
rw [sin_sq, cos_pi_over_two_pow]
theorem sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) ^ 2 = 1 / 2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n / 4 := by
rw [sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow, sqrtTwoAddSeries, div_pow, sq_sqrt, add_div, ← sub_sub]
· congr
· norm_num
· norm_num
· exact add_nonneg two_pos.le (sqrtTwoAddSeries_zero_nonneg _)
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_over_two_pow_succ (n : ℕ) :
sin (π / 2 ^ (n + 2)) = √(2 - sqrtTwoAddSeries 0 n) / 2 := by
rw [eq_div_iff_mul_eq two_ne_zero, eq_comm, sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq, mul_pow,
sin_sq_pi_over_two_pow_succ, sub_mul]
· congr <;> norm_num
· rw [sub_nonneg]
exact (sqrtTwoAddSeries_lt_two _).le
refine mul_nonneg (sin_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ ?_) zero_le_two
· positivity
· exact div_le_self pi_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_four : cos (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_four : sin (π / 4) = √2 / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 2)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_eight : cos (π / 8) = √(2 + √2) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_eight : sin (π / 8) = √(2 - √2) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 3)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_sixteen : cos (π / 16) = √(2 + √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_sixteen : sin (π / 16) = √(2 - √(2 + √2)) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 4)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_thirty_two : cos (π / 32) = √(2 + √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans cos (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_thirty_two : sin (π / 32) = √(2 - √(2 + √(2 + √2))) / 2 := by
trans sin (π / 2 ^ 5)
· congr
norm_num
· simp
-- This section is also a convenient location for other explicit values of `sin` and `cos`.
/-- The cosine of `π / 3` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_three : cos (π / 3) = 1 / 2 := by
have h₁ : (2 * cos (π / 3) - 1) ^ 2 * (2 * cos (π / 3) + 2) = 0 := by
have : cos (3 * (π / 3)) = cos π := by
congr 1
ring
linarith [cos_pi, cos_three_mul (π / 3)]
rcases mul_eq_zero.mp h₁ with h | h
· linarith [pow_eq_zero h]
· have : cos π < cos (π / 3) := by
refine cos_lt_cos_of_nonneg_of_le_pi ?_ le_rfl ?_ <;> linarith [pi_pos]
linarith [cos_pi]
/-- The cosine of `π / 6` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [show (6 : ℝ) = 3 * 2 by norm_num, div_mul_eq_div_div, cos_half, cos_pi_div_three, one_add_div,
← div_mul_eq_div_div, two_add_one_eq_three, sqrt_div, sqrt_mul_self] <;> linarith [pi_pos]
/-- The square of the cosine of `π / 6` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_cos_pi_div_six : cos (π / 6) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [cos_pi_div_six, div_pow, sq_sqrt] <;> norm_num
/-- The sine of `π / 6` is `1 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_six : sin (π / 6) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_three]
congr
ring
/-- The square of the sine of `π / 3` is `3 / 4` (this is sometimes more convenient than the
result for cosine itself). -/
theorem sq_sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) ^ 2 = 3 / 4 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← sq_cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
/-- The sine of `π / 3` is `√3 / 2`. -/
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_three : sin (π / 3) = √3 / 2 := by
rw [← cos_pi_div_two_sub, ← cos_pi_div_six]
congr
ring
theorem quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five :
letI c := cos (π / 5)
4 * c ^ 2 - 2 * c - 1 = 0 := by
set θ := π / 5 with hθ
set c := cos θ
set s := sin θ
suffices 2 * c = 4 * c ^ 2 - 1 by simp [this]
have hs : s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_eq, sin_eq_zero_iff, hθ]
push_neg
intro n hn
replace hn : n * 5 = 1 := by field_simp [mul_comm _ π, mul_assoc] at hn; norm_cast at hn
omega
suffices s * (2 * c) = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) from mul_left_cancel₀ hs this
calc s * (2 * c) = 2 * s * c := by rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm 2]
_ = sin (2 * θ) := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = sin (π - 2 * θ) := by rw [sin_pi_sub]
_ = sin (2 * θ + θ) := by congr; field_simp [hθ]; linarith
_ = sin (2 * θ) * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := sin_add (2 * θ) θ
_ = 2 * s * c * c + cos (2 * θ) * s := by rw [sin_two_mul]
_ = 2 * s * c * c + (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) * s := by rw [cos_two_mul]
_ = s * (2 * c * c) + s * (2 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
_ = s * (4 * c ^ 2 - 1) := by linarith
open Polynomial in
theorem Polynomial.isRoot_cos_pi_div_five :
(4 • X ^ 2 - 2 • X - C 1 : ℝ[X]).IsRoot (cos (π / 5)) := by
simpa using quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
/-- The cosine of `π / 5` is `(1 + √5) / 4`. -/
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_five : cos (π / 5) = (1 + √5) / 4 := by
set c := cos (π / 5)
have : 4 * (c * c) + (-2) * c + (-1) = 0 := by
rw [← sq, neg_mul, ← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact quadratic_root_cos_pi_div_five
have hd : discrim 4 (-2) (-1) = (2 * √5) * (2 * √5) := by norm_num [discrim, mul_mul_mul_comm]
rcases (quadratic_eq_zero_iff (by norm_num) hd c).mp this with h | h
· field_simp [h]; linarith
· absurd (show 0 ≤ c from cos_nonneg_of_mem_Icc <| by constructor <;> linarith [pi_pos.le])
rw [not_le, h]
exact div_neg_of_neg_of_pos (by norm_num [lt_sqrt]) (by positivity)
end CosDivSq
/-- `Real.sin` as an `OrderIso` between `[-(π / 2), π / 2]` and `[-1, 1]`. -/
def sinOrderIso : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2) ≃o Icc (-1 : ℝ) 1 :=
(strictMonoOn_sin.orderIso _ _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ bijOn_sin.image_eq
@[simp]
theorem coe_sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : (sinOrderIso x : ℝ) = sin x :=
rfl
theorem sinOrderIso_apply (x : Icc (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) : sinOrderIso x = ⟨sin x, sin_mem_Icc x⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_four : tan (π / 4) = 1 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, cos_pi_div_four, sin_pi_div_four]
have h : √2 / 2 > 0 := by positivity
exact div_self (ne_of_gt h)
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_two : tan (π / 2) = 0 := by simp [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_six : tan (π / 6) = 1 / sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_six, cos_pi_div_six]
ring
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi_div_three : tan (π / 3) = sqrt 3 := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, sin_pi_div_three, cos_pi_div_three]
ring
theorem tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 < x) (hxp : x < π / 2) : 0 < tan x := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
exact div_pos (sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi h0x (by linarith)) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo ⟨by linarith, hxp⟩)
theorem tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two {x : ℝ} (h0x : 0 ≤ x) (hxp : x ≤ π / 2) : 0 ≤ tan x :=
match lt_or_eq_of_le h0x, lt_or_eq_of_le hxp with
| Or.inl hx0, Or.inl hxp => le_of_lt (tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two hx0 hxp)
| Or.inl _, Or.inr hxp => by simp [hxp, tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
| Or.inr hx0, _ => by simp [hx0.symm]
theorem tan_neg_of_neg_of_pi_div_two_lt {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x < 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) < x) : tan x < 0 :=
neg_pos.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith [pi_pos]))
theorem tan_nonpos_of_nonpos_of_neg_pi_div_two_le {x : ℝ} (hx0 : x ≤ 0) (hpx : -(π / 2) ≤ x) :
tan x ≤ 0 :=
neg_nonneg.1 (tan_neg x ▸ tan_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi_div_two (by linarith) (by linarith))
theorem strictMonoOn_tan : StrictMonoOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) := by
rintro x hx y hy hlt
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos,
div_lt_div_iff₀ (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx) (cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hy), mul_comm, ← sub_pos, ← sin_sub]
exact sin_pos_of_pos_of_lt_pi (sub_pos.2 hlt) <| by linarith [hx.1, hy.2]
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
strictMonoOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hxy.trans hy₂⟩ ⟨hx₁.trans hxy, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_lt_tan_of_nonneg_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : 0 ≤ x) (hy₂ : y < π / 2)
(hxy : x < y) : tan x < tan y :=
tan_lt_tan_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two (by linarith) hy₂ hxy
theorem injOn_tan : InjOn tan (Ioo (-(π / 2)) (π / 2)) :=
strictMonoOn_tan.injOn
theorem tan_inj_of_lt_of_lt_pi_div_two {x y : ℝ} (hx₁ : -(π / 2) < x) (hx₂ : x < π / 2)
(hy₁ : -(π / 2) < y) (hy₂ : y < π / 2) (hxy : tan x = tan y) : x = y :=
injOn_tan ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩ hxy
theorem tan_periodic : Function.Periodic tan π := by
simpa only [Function.Periodic, tan_eq_sin_div_cos] using sin_antiperiodic.div cos_antiperiodic
@[simp]
theorem tan_pi : tan π = 0 := by rw [tan_periodic.eq, tan_zero]
theorem tan_add_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x + π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic x
theorem tan_sub_pi (x : ℝ) : tan (x - π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem tan_pi_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem tan_pi_div_two_sub (x : ℝ) : tan (π / 2 - x) = (tan x)⁻¹ := by
rw [tan_eq_sin_div_cos, tan_eq_sin_div_cos, inv_div, sin_pi_div_two_sub, cos_pi_div_two_sub]
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π) = 0 :=
tan_zero ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_add_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem tan_add_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x + n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem tan_sub_nat_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem tan_sub_int_mul_pi (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (x - n * π) = tan x :=
tan_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem tan_nat_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tan_int_mul_pi_sub (x : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : tan (n * π - x) = -tan x :=
tan_neg x ▸ tan_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem tendsto_sin_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝 1) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsLT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[<] (π / 2)) atTop := by
convert tendsto_cos_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_pos zero_lt_one
tendsto_sin_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
theorem tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto sin (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝 (-1)) := by
convert continuous_sin.continuousWithinAt.tendsto using 2
simp
theorem tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto cos (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) (𝓝[>] 0) := by
apply tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within
· convert continuous_cos.continuousWithinAt.tendsto
simp
· filter_upwards [Ioo_mem_nhdsGT (neg_lt_self pi_div_two_pos)] with x hx
exact cos_pos_of_mem_Ioo hx
theorem tendsto_tan_neg_pi_div_two : Tendsto tan (𝓝[>] (-(π / 2))) atBot := by
convert tendsto_cos_neg_pi_div_two.inv_tendsto_nhdsGT_zero.atTop_mul_neg (by norm_num)
tendsto_sin_neg_pi_div_two using 1
simp only [Pi.inv_apply, ← div_eq_inv_mul, ← tan_eq_sin_div_cos]
end Real
namespace Complex
open Real
theorem sin_eq_zero_iff_cos_eq {z : ℂ} : sin z = 0 ↔ cos z = 1 ∨ cos z = -1 := by
rw [← mul_self_eq_one_iff, ← sin_sq_add_cos_sq, sq, sq, ← sub_eq_iff_eq_add, sub_self]
exact ⟨fun h => by rw [h, mul_zero], eq_zero_of_mul_self_eq_zero ∘ Eq.symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi_div_two : cos (π / 2) = 0 :=
calc
cos (π / 2) = Real.cos (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_cos]; simp
_ = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi_div_two : sin (π / 2) = 1 :=
calc
sin (π / 2) = Real.sin (π / 2) := by rw [ofReal_sin]; simp
_ = 1 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_pi : sin π = 0 := by rw [← ofReal_sin, Real.sin_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem cos_pi : cos π = -1 := by rw [← ofReal_cos, Real.cos_pi]; simp
@[simp]
theorem sin_two_pi : sin (2 * π) = 0 := by simp [two_mul, sin_add]
@[simp]
theorem cos_two_pi : cos (2 * π) = 1 := by simp [two_mul, cos_add]
theorem sin_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic sin π := by simp [sin_add]
theorem sin_periodic : Function.Periodic sin (2 * π) :=
sin_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem sin_add_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic x
theorem sin_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x + 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic x
theorem sin_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - π) = -sin x :=
sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : sin (x - 2 * π) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem sin_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (π - x) = sin x :=
neg_neg (sin x) ▸ sin_neg x ▸ sin_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : sin (2 * π - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem sin_nat_mul_pi (n : ℕ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.nat_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_int_mul_pi (n : ℤ) : sin (n * π) = 0 :=
sin_antiperiodic.int_mul_eq_of_eq_zero sin_zero n
theorem sin_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem sin_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x + n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem sin_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem sin_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (x - n * (2 * π)) = sin x :=
sin_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem sin_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
theorem sin_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : sin (n * (2 * π) - x) = -sin x :=
sin_neg x ▸ sin_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_antiperiodic : Function.Antiperiodic cos π := by simp [cos_add]
theorem cos_periodic : Function.Periodic cos (2 * π) :=
cos_antiperiodic.periodic_two_mul
theorem cos_add_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic x
theorem cos_add_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x + 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic x
theorem cos_sub_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - π) = -cos x :=
cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_sub_two_pi (x : ℂ) : cos (x - 2 * π) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_eq x
theorem cos_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (π - x) = -cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_antiperiodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) : cos (2 * π - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.sub_eq'
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.nat_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π)) = 1 :=
(cos_periodic.int_mul_eq n).trans cos_zero
theorem cos_add_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.nat_mul n x
theorem cos_add_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x + n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.int_mul n x
theorem cos_sub_nat_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_nat_mul_eq n
theorem cos_sub_int_mul_two_pi (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (x - n * (2 * π)) = cos x :=
cos_periodic.sub_int_mul_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.nat_mul_sub_eq n
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Trigonometric/Basic.lean | 1,106 | 1,109 | theorem cos_int_mul_two_pi_sub (x : ℂ) (n : ℤ) : cos (n * (2 * π) - x) = cos x :=
cos_neg x ▸ cos_periodic.int_mul_sub_eq n
theorem cos_nat_mul_two_pi_add_pi (n : ℕ) : cos (n * (2 * π) + π) = -1 := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Neil Strickland. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Neil Strickland
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Group.Multiset.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.PNat.Prime
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Factors
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.OrderedMonoid
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
/-!
# Prime factors of nonzero naturals
This file defines the factorization of a nonzero natural number `n` as a multiset of primes,
the multiplicity of `p` in this factors multiset being the p-adic valuation of `n`.
## Main declarations
* `PrimeMultiset`: Type of multisets of prime numbers.
* `FactorMultiset n`: Multiset of prime factors of `n`.
-/
/-- The type of multisets of prime numbers. Unique factorization
gives an equivalence between this set and ℕ+, as we will formalize
below. -/
def PrimeMultiset :=
Multiset Nat.Primes deriving Inhabited, AddCommMonoid, DistribLattice,
SemilatticeSup, Sub
-- The `CanonicallyOrderedAdd, OrderBot, OrderedSub` instances should be constructed by a deriving
-- handler.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/380
instance : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : CanonicallyOrderedAdd PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (CanonicallyOrderedAdd (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderBot PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderBot (Multiset Nat.Primes))
instance : OrderedSub PrimeMultiset :=
inferInstanceAs (OrderedSub (Multiset Nat.Primes))
namespace PrimeMultiset
-- `@[derive]` doesn't work for `meta` instances
unsafe instance : Repr PrimeMultiset := by delta PrimeMultiset; infer_instance
/-- The multiset consisting of a single prime -/
def ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : PrimeMultiset :=
({p} : Multiset Nat.Primes)
theorem card_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : Multiset.card (ofPrime p) = 1 :=
rfl
/-- We can forget the primality property and regard a multiset
of primes as just a multiset of positive integers, or a multiset
of natural numbers. In the opposite direction, if we have a
multiset of positive integers or natural numbers, together with
a proof that all the elements are prime, then we can regard it
as a multiset of primes. The next block of results records
obvious properties of these coercions.
-/
def toNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coeNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨toNatMultiset⟩
/-- `PrimeMultiset.coe`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of
naturals, promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coeNatMonoidHom : (coeNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_nat_injective
theorem coeNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ) = {(p : ℕ)} :=
rfl
theorem coeNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
/-- Converts a `PrimeMultiset` to a `Multiset ℕ+`. -/
def toPNatMultiset : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+ := fun v => v.map (↑)
instance coePNat : Coe PrimeMultiset (Multiset ℕ+) :=
⟨toPNatMultiset⟩
/-- `coePNat`, the coercion from a multiset of primes to a multiset of positive
naturals, regarded as an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
def coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset →+ Multiset ℕ+ :=
Multiset.mapAddMonoidHom (↑)
@[simp]
theorem coe_coePNatMonoidHom : (coePNatMonoidHom : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) = (↑) :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_injective : Function.Injective ((↑) : PrimeMultiset → Multiset ℕ+) :=
Multiset.map_injective Nat.Primes.coe_pnat_injective
theorem coePNat_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p : Multiset ℕ+) = {(p : ℕ+)} :=
rfl
theorem coePNat_prime (v : PrimeMultiset) (p : ℕ+) (h : p ∈ (v : Multiset ℕ+)) : p.Prime := by
rcases Multiset.mem_map.mp h with ⟨⟨_, hp'⟩, ⟨_, h_eq⟩⟩
exact h_eq ▸ hp'
instance coeMultisetPNatNat : Coe (Multiset ℕ+) (Multiset ℕ) :=
⟨fun v => v.map (↑)⟩
theorem coePNat_nat (v : PrimeMultiset) : ((v : Multiset ℕ+) : Multiset ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ) := by
change (v.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+)).map Subtype.val = v.map Subtype.val
rw [Multiset.map_map]
congr
/-- The product of a `PrimeMultiset`, as a `ℕ+`. -/
def prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : ℕ+ :=
(v : Multiset PNat).prod
theorem coe_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : (v.prod : ℕ) = (v : Multiset ℕ).prod := by
have h : (v.prod : ℕ) = ((v.map (↑) : Multiset ℕ+).map (↑)).prod :=
PNat.coeMonoidHom.map_multiset_prod v.toPNatMultiset
simpa [Multiset.map_map] using h
theorem prod_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) : (ofPrime p).prod = (p : ℕ+) :=
Multiset.prod_singleton _
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ Nat.Primes Nat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨p, hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) : (ofNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ) = v := by
dsimp [ofNatMultiset, toNatMultiset]
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id']
theorem prod_ofNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ) (h) :
((ofNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ) = (v.prod : ℕ) := by rw [coe_prod, to_ofNatMultiset]
/-- If a `Multiset ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset`. -/
def ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ v → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
@Multiset.pmap ℕ+ Nat.Primes PNat.Prime (fun p hp => ⟨(p : ℕ), hp⟩) v h
theorem to_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatMultiset v h : Multiset ℕ+) = v := by
dsimp [ofPNatMultiset, toPNatMultiset]
have : (fun (p : ℕ+) (h : p.Prime) => ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ+) ⟨p, h⟩) = fun p _ => id p := by
funext p h
apply Subtype.eq
rfl
rw [Multiset.map_pmap, this, Multiset.pmap_eq_map, Multiset.map_id]
theorem prod_ofPNatMultiset (v : Multiset ℕ+) (h) : ((ofPNatMultiset v h).prod : ℕ+) = v.prod := by
dsimp [prod]
rw [to_ofPNatMultiset]
/-- Lists can be coerced to multisets; here we have some results
about how this interacts with our constructions on multisets. -/
def ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h : ∀ p : ℕ, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
theorem prod_ofNatList (l : List ℕ) (h) : ((ofNatList l h).prod : ℕ) = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- If a `List ℕ+` consists only of primes, it can be recast as a `PrimeMultiset` with
the coercion from lists to multisets. -/
def ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h : ∀ p : ℕ+, p ∈ l → p.Prime) : PrimeMultiset :=
ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
theorem prod_ofPNatList (l : List ℕ+) (h) : (ofPNatList l h).prod = l.prod := by
have := prod_ofPNatMultiset (l : Multiset ℕ+) h
rw [Multiset.prod_coe] at this
exact this
/-- The product map gives a homomorphism from the additive monoid
of multisets to the multiplicative monoid ℕ+. -/
theorem prod_zero : (0 : PrimeMultiset).prod = 1 := by
exact Multiset.prod_zero
theorem prod_add (u v : PrimeMultiset) : (u + v).prod = u.prod * v.prod := by
change (coePNatMonoidHom (u + v)).prod = _
rw [coePNatMonoidHom.map_add]
exact Multiset.prod_add _ _
theorem prod_smul (d : ℕ) (u : PrimeMultiset) : (d • u).prod = u.prod ^ d := by
induction d with
| zero => simp only [zero_nsmul, pow_zero, prod_zero]
| succ n ih => rw [succ_nsmul, prod_add, ih, pow_succ]
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- The prime factors of n, regarded as a multiset -/
def factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : PrimeMultiset :=
PrimeMultiset.ofNatList (Nat.primeFactorsList n) (@Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList n)
/-- The product of the factors is the original number -/
theorem prod_factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) : (factorMultiset n).prod = n :=
eq <| by
dsimp [factorMultiset]
rw [PrimeMultiset.prod_ofNatList]
exact Nat.prod_primeFactorsList n.ne_zero
theorem coeNat_factorMultiset (n : ℕ+) :
(factorMultiset n : Multiset ℕ) = (Nat.primeFactorsList n : Multiset ℕ) :=
PrimeMultiset.to_ofNatMultiset (Nat.primeFactorsList n) (@Nat.prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList n)
end PNat
namespace PrimeMultiset
/-- If we start with a multiset of primes, take the product and
then factor it, we get back the original multiset. -/
theorem factorMultiset_prod (v : PrimeMultiset) : v.prod.factorMultiset = v := by
apply PrimeMultiset.coeNat_injective
rw [v.prod.coeNat_factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.coe_prod]
rcases v with ⟨l⟩
dsimp [PrimeMultiset.toNatMultiset]
let l' := l.map ((↑) : Nat.Primes → ℕ)
have (p : ℕ) (hp : p ∈ l') : p.Prime := by
simp only [List.map_subtype, List.map_id_fun', id_eq, List.mem_unattach, l'] at hp
obtain ⟨hp', -⟩ := hp
exact hp'
exact Multiset.coe_eq_coe.mpr (@Nat.primeFactorsList_unique _ l' rfl this).symm
end PrimeMultiset
namespace PNat
/-- Positive integers biject with multisets of primes. -/
def factorMultisetEquiv : ℕ+ ≃ PrimeMultiset where
toFun := factorMultiset
invFun := PrimeMultiset.prod
left_inv := prod_factorMultiset
right_inv := PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod
/-- Factoring gives a homomorphism from the multiplicative
monoid ℕ+ to the additive monoid of multisets. -/
theorem factorMultiset_one : factorMultiset 1 = 0 := by
simp [factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.ofNatList, PrimeMultiset.ofNatMultiset]
theorem factorMultiset_mul (n m : ℕ+) :
factorMultiset (n * m) = factorMultiset n + factorMultiset m := by
let u := factorMultiset n
let v := factorMultiset m
have : n = u.prod := (prod_factorMultiset n).symm; rw [this]
have : m = v.prod := (prod_factorMultiset m).symm; rw [this]
rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_add]
repeat' rw [PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod]
theorem factorMultiset_pow (n : ℕ+) (m : ℕ) :
factorMultiset (n ^ m) = m • factorMultiset n := by
let u := factorMultiset n
have : n = u.prod := (prod_factorMultiset n).symm
rw [this, ← PrimeMultiset.prod_smul]
repeat' rw [PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod]
/-- Factoring a prime gives the corresponding one-element multiset. -/
theorem factorMultiset_ofPrime (p : Nat.Primes) :
(p : ℕ+).factorMultiset = PrimeMultiset.ofPrime p := by
apply factorMultisetEquiv.symm.injective
change (p : ℕ+).factorMultiset.prod = (PrimeMultiset.ofPrime p).prod
rw [(p : ℕ+).prod_factorMultiset, PrimeMultiset.prod_ofPrime]
/-- We now have four different results that all encode the
idea that inequality of multisets corresponds to divisibility
of positive integers. -/
theorem factorMultiset_le_iff {m n : ℕ+} : factorMultiset m ≤ factorMultiset n ↔ m ∣ n := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← prod_factorMultiset m, ← prod_factorMultiset m]
apply Dvd.intro (n.factorMultiset - m.factorMultiset).prod
rw [← PrimeMultiset.prod_add, PrimeMultiset.factorMultiset_prod, add_tsub_cancel_of_le h,
prod_factorMultiset]
· intro h
rw [← mul_div_exact h, factorMultiset_mul]
exact le_self_add
theorem factorMultiset_le_iff' {m : ℕ+} {v : PrimeMultiset} :
factorMultiset m ≤ v ↔ m ∣ v.prod := by
let h := @factorMultiset_le_iff m v.prod
rw [v.factorMultiset_prod] at h
exact h
end PNat
namespace PrimeMultiset
theorem prod_dvd_iff {u v : PrimeMultiset} : u.prod ∣ v.prod ↔ u ≤ v := by
let h := @PNat.factorMultiset_le_iff' u.prod v
rw [u.factorMultiset_prod] at h
exact h.symm
| Mathlib/Data/PNat/Factors.lean | 302 | 307 | theorem prod_dvd_iff' {u : PrimeMultiset} {n : ℕ+} : u.prod ∣ n ↔ u ≤ n.factorMultiset := by | let h := @prod_dvd_iff u n.factorMultiset
rw [n.prod_factorMultiset] at h
exact h
end PrimeMultiset |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Violeta Hernández Palacios. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Violeta Hernández Palacios
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Game.Basic
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Ordinal.NaturalOps
/-!
# Ordinals as games
We define the canonical map `Ordinal → SetTheory.PGame`, where every ordinal is mapped to the
game whose left set consists of all previous ordinals.
The map to surreals is defined in `Ordinal.toSurreal`.
# Main declarations
- `Ordinal.toPGame`: The canonical map between ordinals and pre-games.
- `Ordinal.toPGameEmbedding`: The order embedding version of the previous map.
-/
universe u
open SetTheory PGame
open scoped NaturalOps PGame
namespace Ordinal
/-- Converts an ordinal into the corresponding pre-game. -/
noncomputable def toPGame (o : Ordinal.{u}) : PGame.{u} :=
⟨o.toType, PEmpty, fun x => ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val.toPGame, PEmpty.elim⟩
termination_by o
decreasing_by exact ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).prop
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_leftMoves (o : Ordinal) : o.toPGame.LeftMoves = o.toType := by
rw [toPGame, LeftMoves]
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_rightMoves (o : Ordinal) : o.toPGame.RightMoves = PEmpty := by
rw [toPGame, RightMoves]
instance isEmpty_zero_toPGame_leftMoves : IsEmpty (toPGame 0).LeftMoves := by
rw [toPGame_leftMoves]; infer_instance
instance isEmpty_toPGame_rightMoves (o : Ordinal) : IsEmpty o.toPGame.RightMoves := by
rw [toPGame_rightMoves]; infer_instance
/-- Converts an ordinal less than `o` into a move for the `PGame` corresponding to `o`, and vice
versa. -/
noncomputable def toLeftMovesToPGame {o : Ordinal} : Set.Iio o ≃ o.toPGame.LeftMoves :=
(enumIsoToType o).toEquiv.trans (Equiv.cast (toPGame_leftMoves o).symm)
@[simp]
theorem toLeftMovesToPGame_symm_lt {o : Ordinal} (i : o.toPGame.LeftMoves) :
↑(toLeftMovesToPGame.symm i) < o :=
(toLeftMovesToPGame.symm i).prop
@[nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem toPGame_moveLeft_hEq {o : Ordinal} :
HEq o.toPGame.moveLeft fun x : o.toType => ((enumIsoToType o).symm x).val.toPGame := by
rw [toPGame]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_moveLeft' {o : Ordinal} (i) :
o.toPGame.moveLeft i = (toLeftMovesToPGame.symm i).val.toPGame :=
(congr_heq toPGame_moveLeft_hEq.symm (cast_heq _ i)).symm
theorem toPGame_moveLeft {o : Ordinal} (i) :
o.toPGame.moveLeft (toLeftMovesToPGame i) = i.val.toPGame := by simp
/-- `0.toPGame` has the same moves as `0`. -/
noncomputable def zeroToPGameRelabelling : toPGame 0 ≡r 0 :=
Relabelling.isEmpty _
theorem toPGame_zero : toPGame 0 ≈ 0 :=
zeroToPGameRelabelling.equiv
noncomputable instance uniqueOneToPGameLeftMoves : Unique (toPGame 1).LeftMoves :=
(Equiv.cast <| toPGame_leftMoves 1).unique
@[simp]
theorem one_toPGame_leftMoves_default_eq :
(default : (toPGame 1).LeftMoves) = @toLeftMovesToPGame 1 ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem to_leftMoves_one_toPGame_symm (i) :
(@toLeftMovesToPGame 1).symm i = ⟨0, Set.mem_Iio.mpr zero_lt_one⟩ := by
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
theorem one_toPGame_moveLeft (x) : (toPGame 1).moveLeft x = toPGame 0 := by simp
/-- `1.toPGame` has the same moves as `1`. -/
noncomputable def oneToPGameRelabelling : toPGame 1 ≡r 1 :=
⟨Equiv.ofUnique _ _, Equiv.equivOfIsEmpty _ _, fun i => by
simpa using zeroToPGameRelabelling, isEmptyElim⟩
theorem toPGame_one : toPGame 1 ≈ 1 :=
oneToPGameRelabelling.equiv
theorem toPGame_lf {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a.toPGame ⧏ b.toPGame := by
convert moveLeft_lf (toLeftMovesToPGame ⟨a, h⟩); rw [toPGame_moveLeft]
theorem toPGame_le {a b : Ordinal} (h : a ≤ b) : a.toPGame ≤ b.toPGame := by
refine le_iff_forall_lf.2 ⟨fun i => ?_, isEmptyElim⟩
rw [toPGame_moveLeft']
exact toPGame_lf ((toLeftMovesToPGame_symm_lt i).trans_le h)
theorem toPGame_lt {a b : Ordinal} (h : a < b) : a.toPGame < b.toPGame :=
⟨toPGame_le h.le, toPGame_lf h⟩
theorem toPGame_nonneg (a : Ordinal) : 0 ≤ a.toPGame :=
zeroToPGameRelabelling.ge.trans <| toPGame_le <| Ordinal.zero_le a
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_lf_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a.toPGame ⧏ b.toPGame ↔ a < b :=
⟨by contrapose; rw [not_lt, not_lf]; exact toPGame_le, toPGame_lf⟩
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_le_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a.toPGame ≤ b.toPGame ↔ a ≤ b :=
⟨by contrapose; rw [not_le, PGame.not_le]; exact toPGame_lf, toPGame_le⟩
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_lt_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a.toPGame < b.toPGame ↔ a < b :=
⟨by contrapose; rw [not_lt]; exact fun h => not_lt_of_le (toPGame_le h), toPGame_lt⟩
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_equiv_iff {a b : Ordinal} : (a.toPGame ≈ b.toPGame) ↔ a = b := by
-- Porting note: was `rw [PGame.Equiv]`
change _ ≤_ ∧ _ ≤ _ ↔ _
rw [le_antisymm_iff, toPGame_le_iff, toPGame_le_iff]
theorem toPGame_injective : Function.Injective Ordinal.toPGame := fun _ _ h =>
toPGame_equiv_iff.1 <| equiv_of_eq h
@[simp]
theorem toPGame_inj {a b : Ordinal} : a.toPGame = b.toPGame ↔ a = b :=
toPGame_injective.eq_iff
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toPGame_eq_iff := toPGame_inj
/-- The order embedding version of `toPGame`. -/
@[simps]
noncomputable def toPGameEmbedding : Ordinal.{u} ↪o PGame.{u} where
toFun := Ordinal.toPGame
inj' := toPGame_injective
map_rel_iff' := @toPGame_le_iff
/-- Converts an ordinal into the corresponding game. -/
noncomputable def toGame : Ordinal.{u} ↪o Game.{u} where
toFun o := ⟦o.toPGame⟧
inj' a b := by simpa [AntisymmRel] using le_antisymm
map_rel_iff' := toPGame_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem mk_toPGame (o : Ordinal) : ⟦o.toPGame⟧ = o.toGame :=
rfl
@[deprecated toGame (since := "2024-11-23")]
alias toGameEmbedding := toGame
@[simp]
theorem toGame_zero : toGame 0 = 0 :=
game_eq toPGame_zero
@[simp]
theorem toGame_one : toGame 1 = 1 :=
game_eq toPGame_one
theorem toGame_injective : Function.Injective toGame :=
toGame.injective
@[simp]
theorem toGame_lf_iff {a b : Ordinal} : Game.LF a.toGame b.toGame ↔ a < b :=
toPGame_lf_iff
theorem toGame_le_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a.toGame ≤ b.toGame ↔ a ≤ b :=
toPGame_le_iff
theorem toGame_lt_iff {a b : Ordinal} : a.toGame < b.toGame ↔ a < b :=
toPGame_lt_iff
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Game/Ordinal.lean | 188 | 207 | theorem toGame_inj {a b : Ordinal} : a.toGame = b.toGame ↔ a = b :=
toGame.inj
@[deprecated (since := "2024-12-29")] alias toGame_eq_iff := toGame_inj
/-- The natural addition of ordinals corresponds to their sum as games. -/
theorem toPGame_nadd (a b : Ordinal) : (a ♯ b).toPGame ≈ a.toPGame + b.toPGame := by | refine ⟨le_of_forall_lf (fun i => ?_) isEmptyElim, le_of_forall_lf (fun i => ?_) isEmptyElim⟩
· rw [toPGame_moveLeft']
rcases lt_nadd_iff.1 (toLeftMovesToPGame_symm_lt i) with (⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ | ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩) <;>
rw [← toPGame_le_iff, le_congr_right (toPGame_nadd _ _)] at hc' <;>
apply lf_of_le_of_lf hc'
· apply add_lf_add_right
rwa [toPGame_lf_iff]
· apply add_lf_add_left
rwa [toPGame_lf_iff]
· apply leftMoves_add_cases i <;>
intro i <;>
let wf := toLeftMovesToPGame_symm_lt i <;>
(try rw [add_moveLeft_inl]) <;> |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.RestrictScalars
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Rat
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.MonoidLocalization.Basic
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.Tower
/-!
# The tensor product of R-algebras
This file provides results about the multiplicative structure on `A ⊗[R] B` when `R` is a
commutative (semi)ring and `A` and `B` are both `R`-algebras. On these tensor products,
multiplication is characterized by `(a₁ ⊗ₜ b₁) * (a₂ ⊗ₜ b₂) = (a₁ * a₂) ⊗ₜ (b₁ * b₂)`.
## Main declarations
- `LinearMap.baseChange A f` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗ f`, for an `R`-linear map `f`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.semiring`: the ring structure on `A ⊗[R] B` for two `R`-algebras `A`, `B`.
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.leftAlgebra`: the `S`-algebra structure on `A ⊗[R] B`, for when `A` is
additionally an `S` algebra.
- the structure isomorphisms
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.lid : R ⊗[R] A ≃ₐ[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.rid : A ⊗[R] R ≃ₐ[S] A` (usually used with `S = R` or `S = A`)
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.comm : A ⊗[R] B ≃ₐ[R] B ⊗[R] A`
* `Algebra.TensorProduct.assoc : ((A ⊗[R] B) ⊗[R] C) ≃ₐ[R] (A ⊗[R] (B ⊗[R] C))`
- `Algebra.TensorProduct.liftEquiv`: a universal property for the tensor product of algebras.
## References
* [C. Kassel, *Quantum Groups* (§II.4)][Kassel1995]
-/
assert_not_exists Equiv.Perm.cycleType
suppress_compilation
open scoped TensorProduct
open TensorProduct
namespace LinearMap
open TensorProduct
/-!
### The base-change of a linear map of `R`-modules to a linear map of `A`-modules
-/
section Semiring
variable {R A B M N P : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] [Semiring B] [Algebra R B]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P]
variable (r : R) (f g : M →ₗ[R] N)
variable (A) in
/-- `baseChange A f` for `f : M →ₗ[R] N` is the `A`-linear map `A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N`.
This "base change" operation is also known as "extension of scalars". -/
def baseChange (f : M →ₗ[R] N) : A ⊗[R] M →ₗ[A] A ⊗[R] N :=
AlgebraTensorModule.map (LinearMap.id : A →ₗ[A] A) f
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_tmul (a : A) (x : M) : f.baseChange A (a ⊗ₜ x) = a ⊗ₜ f x :=
rfl
theorem baseChange_eq_ltensor : (f.baseChange A : A ⊗ M → A ⊗ N) = f.lTensor A :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_add : (f + g).baseChange A = f.baseChange A + g.baseChange A := by
ext
-- Porting note: added `-baseChange_tmul`
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor, -baseChange_tmul]
@[simp]
theorem baseChange_zero : baseChange A (0 : M →ₗ[R] N) = 0 := by
ext
simp [baseChange_eq_ltensor]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/TensorProduct/Basic.lean | 90 | 92 | theorem baseChange_smul : (r • f).baseChange A = r • f.baseChange A := by | ext
simp [baseChange_tmul] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Composition.IntegralCompProd
import Mathlib.Probability.Kernel.Disintegration.StandardBorel
/-!
# Lebesgue and Bochner integrals of conditional kernels
Integrals of `ProbabilityTheory.Kernel.condKernel` and `MeasureTheory.Measure.condKernel`.
## Main statements
* `ProbabilityTheory.setIntegral_condKernel`: the integral
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)` is equal to
`∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a)`.
* `MeasureTheory.Measure.setIntegral_condKernel`:
`∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ`
Corresponding statements for the Lebesgue integral and/or without the sets `s` and `t` are also
provided.
-/
open MeasureTheory ProbabilityTheory MeasurableSpace
open scoped ENNReal
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {α β Ω : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem (a : α) {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x) (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
simp_rw [Kernel.compProd_apply hs]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = κ a (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : κ a (s ×ˢ t) = (Kernel.fst κ ⊗ₖ Kernel.condKernel κ) a (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (κ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, Kernel.compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) {c | (b, c) ∈ s ×ˢ t}
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b) t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [Set.preimage, this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.lintegral_compProd _ _ _ hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [Kernel.setLIntegral_compProd _ _ _ hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) (a : α) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf a MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
section Integral
variable [CountableOrCountablyGenerated α β] {κ : Kernel α (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteKernel κ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_condKernel (a : α)
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f (κ a)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, x)))
(Kernel.fst κ a) := by
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd hf
lemma integral_condKernel (a : α) (hf : Integrable f (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a) = ∫ x, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [integral_compProd hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
conv_rhs => rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel]
rw [← κ.disintegrate κ.condKernel] at hf
rw [setIntegral_compProd hs ht hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (a : α) {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ Set.univ) (κ a)) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a hs MeasurableSet.univ hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (a : α) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ t) (κ a)) :
∫ b, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(Kernel.condKernel κ (a, b)) ∂(Kernel.fst κ a)
= ∫ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂(κ a) := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel a MeasurableSet.univ ht hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Integral
end ProbabilityTheory
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
variable {β Ω : Type*} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β}
[MeasurableSpace Ω] [StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω]
section Lintegral
variable {ρ : Measure (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
{f : β × Ω → ℝ≥0∞}
lemma lintegral_condKernel_mem {s : Set (β × Ω)} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ x, ρ.condKernel x {y | (x, y) ∈ s} ∂ρ.fst = ρ s := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
simp_rw [compProd_apply hs]
rfl
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_eq_measure_prod {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ρ.condKernel b t ∂ρ.fst = ρ (s ×ˢ t) := by
have : ρ (s ×ˢ t) = (ρ.fst ⊗ₘ ρ.condKernel) (s ×ˢ t) := by
congr; exact (ρ.disintegrate _).symm
rw [this, compProd_apply (hs.prod ht)]
classical
have : ∀ b, ρ.condKernel b (Prod.mk b ⁻¹' s ×ˢ t)
= s.indicator (fun b ↦ ρ.condKernel b t) b := by
intro b
by_cases hb : b ∈ s <;> simp [hb]
simp_rw [this]
rw [lintegral_indicator hs]
lemma lintegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂ρ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [lintegral_compProd hf]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [setLIntegral_compProd hf hs ht]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_right (hf : Measurable f) {s : Set β}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) :
∫⁻ b in s, ∫⁻ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst
= ∫⁻ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂ρ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf hs MeasurableSet.univ]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setLIntegral_condKernel_univ_left (hf : Measurable f) {t : Set Ω}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) :
∫⁻ b, ∫⁻ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst
= ∫⁻ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ := by
rw [← setLIntegral_condKernel hf MeasurableSet.univ ht]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Lintegral
section Integral
variable {ρ : Measure (β × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
{E : Type*} {f : β × Ω → E} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_condKernel
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ρ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun x ↦ ∫ y, f (x, y) ∂ρ.condKernel x) ρ.fst := by
rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel] at hf
exact AEStronglyMeasurable.integral_kernel_compProd hf
lemma integral_condKernel (hf : Integrable f ρ) :
∫ b, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x, f x ∂ρ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel] at hf
rw [integral_compProd hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
{t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t) (hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ t) ρ) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ := by
conv_rhs => rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel]
rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel] at hf
rw [setIntegral_compProd hs ht hf]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_right {s : Set β} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (s ×ˢ Set.univ) ρ) :
∫ b in s, ∫ ω, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in s ×ˢ Set.univ, f x ∂ρ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel hs MeasurableSet.univ hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
lemma setIntegral_condKernel_univ_left {t : Set Ω} (ht : MeasurableSet t)
(hf : IntegrableOn f (Set.univ ×ˢ t) ρ) :
∫ b, ∫ ω in t, f (b, ω) ∂(ρ.condKernel b) ∂ρ.fst = ∫ x in Set.univ ×ˢ t, f x ∂ρ := by
rw [← setIntegral_condKernel MeasurableSet.univ ht hf]; simp_rw [Measure.restrict_univ]
end Integral
end MeasureTheory.Measure
namespace MeasureTheory
/-! ### Integrability
We place these lemmas in the `MeasureTheory` namespace to enable dot notation. -/
open ProbabilityTheory
variable {α Ω E F : Type*} {mα : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace Ω]
[StandardBorelSpace Ω] [Nonempty Ω] [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] {ρ : Measure (α × Ω)} [IsFiniteMeasure ρ]
| Mathlib/Probability/Kernel/Disintegration/Integral.lean | 233 | 237 | theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.ae_integrable_condKernel_iff {f : α × Ω → F}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ρ) :
(∀ᵐ a ∂ρ.fst, Integrable (fun ω ↦ f (a, ω)) (ρ.condKernel a)) ∧
Integrable (fun a ↦ ∫ ω, ‖f (a, ω)‖ ∂ρ.condKernel a) ρ.fst ↔ Integrable f ρ := by | rw [← ρ.disintegrate ρ.condKernel] at hf |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Combinators
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Defs
import Mathlib.Logic.IsEmpty
import Mathlib.Logic.Relator
import Mathlib.Util.CompileInductive
import Aesop
/-!
# Option of a type
This file develops the basic theory of option types.
If `α` is a type, then `Option α` can be understood as the type with one more element than `α`.
`Option α` has terms `some a`, where `a : α`, and `none`, which is the added element.
This is useful in multiple ways:
* It is the prototype of addition of terms to a type. See for example `WithBot α` which uses
`none` as an element smaller than all others.
* It can be used to define failsafe partial functions, which return `some the_result_we_expect`
if we can find `the_result_we_expect`, and `none` if there is no meaningful result. This forces
any subsequent use of the partial function to explicitly deal with the exceptions that make it
return `none`.
* `Option` is a monad. We love monads.
`Part` is an alternative to `Option` that can be seen as the type of `True`/`False` values
along with a term `a : α` if the value is `True`.
-/
universe u
namespace Option
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
theorem coe_def : (fun a ↦ ↑a : α → Option α) = some :=
rfl
theorem mem_map {f : α → β} {y : β} {o : Option α} : y ∈ o.map f ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, f x = y := by simp
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `Option.mem_def`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `H` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Function.Injective f) {a : α} {o : Option α} :
f a ∈ o.map f ↔ a ∈ o := by
aesop
theorem forall_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∀ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∀ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by simp
| Mathlib/Data/Option/Basic.lean | 57 | 58 | theorem exists_mem_map {f : α → β} {o : Option α} {p : β → Prop} :
(∃ y ∈ o.map f, p y) ↔ ∃ x ∈ o, p (f x) := by | simp |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Keeley Hoek
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.NeZero
import Mathlib.Data.Int.DivMod
import Mathlib.Logic.Embedding.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
import Mathlib.Tactic.Attr.Register
/-!
# The finite type with `n` elements
`Fin n` is the type whose elements are natural numbers smaller than `n`.
This file expands on the development in the core library.
## Main definitions
### Induction principles
* `finZeroElim` : Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, generalizes `Fin.elim0`.
Further definitions and eliminators can be found in `Init.Data.Fin.Lemmas`
### Embeddings and isomorphisms
* `Fin.valEmbedding` : coercion to natural numbers as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.succEmb` : `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding`;
* `Fin.castLEEmb h` : `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin m`, `h : n ≤ m`;
* `finCongr` : `Fin.cast` as an `Equiv`, equivalence between `Fin n` and `Fin m` when `n = m`;
* `Fin.castAddEmb m` : `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+m)`;
* `Fin.castSuccEmb` : `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, embed `Fin n` into `Fin (n+1)`;
* `Fin.addNatEmb m i` : `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, add `m` on `i` on the right,
generalizes `Fin.succ`;
* `Fin.natAddEmb n i` : `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, adds `n` on `i` on the left;
### Other casts
* `Fin.divNat i` : divides `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
* `Fin.modNat i` : takes the mod of `i : Fin (m * n)` by `n`;
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid Finset
open Fin Nat Function
attribute [simp] Fin.succ_ne_zero Fin.castSucc_lt_last
/-- Elimination principle for the empty set `Fin 0`, dependent version. -/
def finZeroElim {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (x : Fin 0) : α x :=
x.elim0
namespace Fin
@[simp] theorem mk_eq_one {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
(⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) = 1 ↔ a = 1 :=
mk.inj_iff
@[simp] theorem one_eq_mk {n a : Nat} {ha : a < n + 2} :
1 = (⟨a, ha⟩ : Fin (n + 2)) ↔ a = 1 := by
simp [eq_comm]
instance {n : ℕ} : CanLift ℕ (Fin n) Fin.val (· < n) where
prf k hk := ⟨⟨k, hk⟩, rfl⟩
/-- A dependent variant of `Fin.elim0`. -/
def rec0 {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} (i : Fin 0) : α i := absurd i.2 (Nat.not_lt_zero _)
variable {n m : ℕ}
--variable {a b : Fin n} -- this *really* breaks stuff
theorem val_injective : Function.Injective (@Fin.val n) :=
@Fin.eq_of_val_eq n
/-- If you actually have an element of `Fin n`, then the `n` is always positive -/
lemma size_positive : Fin n → 0 < n := Fin.pos
lemma size_positive' [Nonempty (Fin n)] : 0 < n :=
‹Nonempty (Fin n)›.elim Fin.pos
protected theorem prop (a : Fin n) : a.val < n :=
a.2
lemma lt_last_iff_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 1)} : a < last n ↔ a ≠ last n := by
simp [Fin.lt_iff_le_and_ne, le_last]
lemma ne_zero_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : b ≠ 0 :=
Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt a.zero_le hab
lemma ne_last_of_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (hab : a < b) : a ≠ last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le hab b.le_last
/-- Equivalence between `Fin n` and `{ i // i < n }`. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def equivSubtype : Fin n ≃ { i // i < n } where
toFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
invFun a := ⟨a.1, a.2⟩
left_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
right_inv := fun ⟨_, _⟩ => rfl
section coe
/-!
### coercions and constructions
-/
theorem val_eq_val (a b : Fin n) : (a : ℕ) = b ↔ a = b :=
Fin.ext_iff.symm
theorem ne_iff_vne (a b : Fin n) : a ≠ b ↔ a.1 ≠ b.1 :=
Fin.ext_iff.not
theorem mk_eq_mk {a h a' h'} : @mk n a h = @mk n a' h' ↔ a = a' :=
Fin.ext_iff
-- syntactic tautologies now
/-- Assume `k = l`. If two functions defined on `Fin k` and `Fin l` are equal on each element,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun_iff {α : Sort*} {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {f : Fin k → α} {g : Fin l → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ i : Fin k, f i = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ := by
subst h
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Assume `k = l` and `k' = l'`.
If two functions `Fin k → Fin k' → α` and `Fin l → Fin l' → α` are equal on each pair,
then they coincide (in the heq sense). -/
protected theorem heq_fun₂_iff {α : Sort*} {k l k' l' : ℕ} (h : k = l) (h' : k' = l')
{f : Fin k → Fin k' → α} {g : Fin l → Fin l' → α} :
HEq f g ↔ ∀ (i : Fin k) (j : Fin k'), f i j = g ⟨(i : ℕ), h ▸ i.2⟩ ⟨(j : ℕ), h' ▸ j.2⟩ := by
subst h
subst h'
simp [funext_iff]
/-- Two elements of `Fin k` and `Fin l` are heq iff their values in `ℕ` coincide. This requires
`k = l`. For the left implication without this assumption, see `val_eq_val_of_heq`. -/
protected theorem heq_ext_iff {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) {i : Fin k} {j : Fin l} :
HEq i j ↔ (i : ℕ) = (j : ℕ) := by
subst h
simp [val_eq_val]
end coe
section Order
/-!
### order
-/
theorem le_iff_val_le_val {a b : Fin n} : a ≤ b ↔ (a : ℕ) ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a < b` as natural numbers if and only if `a < b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) < (b : ℕ) ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- `a ≤ b` as natural numbers if and only if `a ≤ b` in `Fin n`. -/
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem val_fin_le {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} : (a : ℕ) ≤ (b : ℕ) ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
theorem min_val {a : Fin n} : min (a : ℕ) n = a := by simp
theorem max_val {a : Fin n} : max (a : ℕ) n = n := by simp
/-- The inclusion map `Fin n → ℕ` is an embedding. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied apply]
def valEmbedding : Fin n ↪ ℕ :=
⟨val, val_injective⟩
@[simp]
theorem equivSubtype_symm_trans_valEmbedding :
equivSubtype.symm.toEmbedding.trans valEmbedding = Embedding.subtype (· < n) :=
rfl
/-- Use the ordering on `Fin n` for checking recursive definitions.
For example, the following definition is not accepted by the termination checker,
unless we declare the `WellFoundedRelation` instance:
```lean
def factorial {n : ℕ} : Fin n → ℕ
| ⟨0, _⟩ := 1
| ⟨i + 1, hi⟩ := (i + 1) * factorial ⟨i, i.lt_succ_self.trans hi⟩
```
-/
instance {n : ℕ} : WellFoundedRelation (Fin n) :=
measure (val : Fin n → ℕ)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-24")]
alias val_zero' := val_zero
/-- `Fin.mk_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n + 1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (⟨0, pos_of_neZero n⟩ : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
/--
The `Fin.zero_le` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
protected theorem zero_le' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 ≤ a :=
Nat.zero_le a.val
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
rw [Fin.ext_iff, val_zero]
theorem val_ne_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : a.val ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
val_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem val_pos_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin n} : 0 < a.val ↔ 0 < a := by
rw [← val_fin_lt, val_zero]
/--
The `Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem pos_iff_ne_zero' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : 0 < a ↔ a ≠ 0 := by
rw [← val_pos_iff, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
@[simp] lemma cast_eq_self (a : Fin n) : a.cast rfl = a := rfl
@[simp] theorem cast_eq_zero {k l : ℕ} [NeZero k] [NeZero l]
(h : k = l) (x : Fin k) : Fin.cast h x = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [← val_eq_zero_iff]
lemma cast_injective {k l : ℕ} (h : k = l) : Injective (Fin.cast h) :=
fun a b hab ↦ by simpa [← val_eq_val] using hab
theorem last_pos' [NeZero n] : 0 < last n := n.pos_of_neZero
theorem one_lt_last [NeZero n] : 1 < last (n + 1) := by
rw [lt_iff_val_lt_val, val_one, val_last, Nat.lt_add_left_iff_pos, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
exact NeZero.ne n
end Order
/-! ### Coercions to `ℤ` and the `fin_omega` tactic. -/
open Int
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = if v ≤ u then (u - v : Int) else (u - v : Int) + n := by
rw [Fin.sub_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_sub_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u - v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) - (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_sub_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_add_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_ite {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = if (u + v : ℕ) < n then (u + v : Int) else (u + v : Int) - n := by
rw [Fin.add_def]
split
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [natCast_emod, Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
theorem coe_int_add_eq_mod {n : Nat} (u v : Fin n) :
((u + v : Fin n) : Int) = ((u : Int) + (v : Int)) % n := by
rw [coe_int_add_eq_ite]
split
· rw [Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
· rw [Int.emod_eq_sub_self_emod, Int.emod_eq_of_lt] <;> omega
-- Write `a + b` as `if (a + b : ℕ) < n then (a + b : ℤ) else (a + b : ℤ) - n` and
-- similarly `a - b` as `if (b : ℕ) ≤ a then (a - b : ℤ) else (a - b : ℤ) + n`.
attribute [fin_omega] coe_int_sub_eq_ite coe_int_add_eq_ite
-- Rewrite inequalities in `Fin` to inequalities in `ℕ`
attribute [fin_omega] Fin.lt_iff_val_lt_val Fin.le_iff_val_le_val
-- Rewrite `1 : Fin (n + 2)` to `1 : ℤ`
attribute [fin_omega] val_one
/--
Preprocessor for `omega` to handle inequalities in `Fin`.
Note that this involves a lot of case splitting, so may be slow.
-/
-- Further adjustment to the simp set can probably make this more powerful.
-- Please experiment and PR updates!
macro "fin_omega" : tactic => `(tactic|
{ try simp only [fin_omega, ← Int.ofNat_lt, ← Int.ofNat_le] at *
omega })
section Add
/-!
### addition, numerals, and coercion from Nat
-/
@[simp]
theorem val_one' (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : ((1 : Fin n) : ℕ) = 1 % n :=
rfl
@[deprecated val_one' (since := "2025-03-10")]
theorem val_one'' {n : ℕ} : ((1 : Fin (n + 1)) : ℕ) = 1 % (n + 1) :=
rfl
instance nontrivial {n : ℕ} : Nontrivial (Fin (n + 2)) where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, (ne_iff_vne 0 1).mpr (by simp [val_one, val_zero])⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_two_le : Nontrivial (Fin n) ↔ 2 ≤ n := by
rcases n with (_ | _ | n) <;>
simp [Fin.nontrivial, not_nontrivial, Nat.succ_le_iff]
section Monoid
instance inhabitedFinOneAdd (n : ℕ) : Inhabited (Fin (1 + n)) :=
haveI : NeZero (1 + n) := by rw [Nat.add_comm]; infer_instance
inferInstance
@[simp]
theorem default_eq_zero (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (default : Fin n) = 0 :=
rfl
instance instNatCast [NeZero n] : NatCast (Fin n) where
natCast i := Fin.ofNat' n i
lemma natCast_def [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : (a : Fin n) = ⟨a % n, mod_lt _ n.pos_of_neZero⟩ := rfl
end Monoid
theorem val_add_eq_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
(↑(a + b) : ℕ) = if n ≤ a + b then a + b - n else a + b := by
rw [Fin.val_add, Nat.add_mod_eq_ite, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑a < n from a.2),
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt (show ↑b < n from b.2)]
theorem val_add_eq_of_add_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin n} (huv : a.val + b.val < n) :
(a + b).val = a.val + b.val := by
rw [val_add]
simp [Nat.mod_eq_of_lt huv]
lemma intCast_val_sub_eq_sub_add_ite {n : ℕ} (a b : Fin n) :
((a - b).val : ℤ) = a.val - b.val + if b ≤ a then 0 else n := by
split <;> fin_omega
lemma one_le_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} (hk : k ≠ 0) : 1 ≤ k := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
cases n with
| zero => simp only [Nat.reduceAdd, Fin.isValue, Fin.zero_le]
| succ n => rwa [Fin.le_iff_val_le_val, Fin.val_one, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, val_ne_zero_iff]
lemma val_sub_one_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} (hi : i ≠ 0) : (i - 1).val = i - 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (NeZero.ne n)
rw [Fin.sub_val_of_le (one_le_of_ne_zero hi), Fin.val_one', Nat.mod_eq_of_lt
(Nat.succ_le_iff.mpr (nontrivial_iff_two_le.mp <| nontrivial_of_ne i 0 hi))]
section OfNatCoe
@[simp]
theorem ofNat'_eq_cast (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] (a : ℕ) : Fin.ofNat' n a = a :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma val_natCast (a n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n).val = a % n := rfl
/-- Converting an in-range number to `Fin (n + 1)` produces a result
whose value is the original number. -/
theorem val_cast_of_lt {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {a : ℕ} (h : a < n) : (a : Fin n).val = a :=
Nat.mod_eq_of_lt h
/-- If `n` is non-zero, converting the value of a `Fin n` to `Fin n` results
in the same value. -/
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem cast_val_eq_self {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : (a.val : Fin n) = a :=
Fin.ext <| val_cast_of_lt a.isLt
-- This is a special case of `CharP.cast_eq_zero` that doesn't require typeclass search
@[simp high] lemma natCast_self (n : ℕ) [NeZero n] : (n : Fin n) = 0 := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma natCast_eq_zero {a n : ℕ} [NeZero n] : (a : Fin n) = 0 ↔ n ∣ a := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff, Nat.dvd_iff_mod_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem natCast_eq_last (n) : (n : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.last n := by ext; simp
theorem le_val_last (i : Fin (n + 1)) : i ≤ n := by
rw [Fin.natCast_eq_last]
exact Fin.le_last i
variable {a b : ℕ}
lemma natCast_le_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn
simp [le_iff_val_le_val, -val_fin_le, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_lt_natCast (han : a ≤ n) (hbn : b ≤ n) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b ↔ a < b := by
rw [← Nat.lt_succ_iff] at han hbn; simp [lt_iff_val_lt_val, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt, han, hbn]
lemma natCast_mono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a ≤ b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) ≤ b :=
(natCast_le_natCast (hab.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
lemma natCast_strictMono (hbn : b ≤ n) (hab : a < b) : (a : Fin (n + 1)) < b :=
(natCast_lt_natCast (hab.le.trans hbn) hbn).2 hab
end OfNatCoe
end Add
section Succ
/-!
### succ and casts into larger Fin types
-/
lemma succ_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.succ n) := fun a b ↦ by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.succ` as an `Embedding` -/
def succEmb (n : ℕ) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) where
toFun := succ
inj' := succ_injective _
@[simp]
theorem coe_succEmb : ⇑(succEmb n) = Fin.succ :=
rfl
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-12")]
alias val_succEmb := coe_succEmb
@[simp]
theorem exists_succ_eq {x : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ y, Fin.succ y = x) ↔ x ≠ 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨_, hy⟩ => hy ▸ succ_ne_zero _, x.cases (fun h => h.irrefl.elim) (fun _ _ => ⟨_, rfl⟩)⟩
theorem exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ 0) :
∃ y, Fin.succ y = x := exists_succ_eq.mpr h
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero_eq_one' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (0 : Fin n) = 1 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
theorem one_pos' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) < 1 := succ_zero_eq_one' (n := n) ▸ succ_pos _
theorem zero_ne_one' [NeZero n] : (0 : Fin (n + 1)) ≠ 1 := Fin.ne_of_lt one_pos'
/--
The `Fin.succ_one_eq_two` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+2)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem succ_one_eq_two' [NeZero n] : Fin.succ (1 : Fin (n + 1)) = 2 := by
cases n
· exact (NeZero.ne 0 rfl).elim
· rfl
-- Version of `succ_one_eq_two` to be used by `dsimp`.
-- Note the `'` swapped around due to a move to std4.
/--
The `Fin.le_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem le_zero_iff' {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] {k : Fin n} : k ≤ 0 ↔ k = 0 :=
⟨fun h => Fin.ext <| by rw [Nat.eq_zero_of_le_zero h]; rfl, by rintro rfl; exact Nat.le_refl _⟩
-- TODO: Move to Batteries
@[simp] lemma castLE_inj {hmn : m ≤ n} {a b : Fin m} : castLE hmn a = castLE hmn b ↔ a = b := by
simp [Fin.ext_iff]
@[simp] lemma castAdd_inj {a b : Fin m} : castAdd n a = castAdd n b ↔ a = b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
attribute [simp] castSucc_inj
lemma castLE_injective (hmn : m ≤ n) : Injective (castLE hmn) :=
fun _ _ hab ↦ Fin.ext (congr_arg val hab :)
lemma castAdd_injective (m n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castAdd m n) := castLE_injective _
lemma castSucc_injective (n : ℕ) : Injective (@Fin.castSucc n) := castAdd_injective _ _
/-- `Fin.castLE` as an `Embedding`, `castLEEmb h i` embeds `i` into a larger `Fin` type. -/
@[simps apply]
def castLEEmb (h : n ≤ m) : Fin n ↪ Fin m where
toFun := castLE h
inj' := castLE_injective _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castLEEmb {m n} (hmn : m ≤ n) : castLEEmb hmn = castLE hmn := rfl
/- The next proof can be golfed a lot using `Fintype.card`.
It is written this way to define `ENat.card` and `Nat.card` without a `Fintype` dependency
(not done yet). -/
lemma nonempty_embedding_iff : Nonempty (Fin n ↪ Fin m) ↔ n ≤ m := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ⟨castLEEmb h⟩⟩
induction n generalizing m with
| zero => exact m.zero_le
| succ n ihn =>
obtain ⟨e⟩ := h
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero (pos_iff_nonempty.2 (Nonempty.map e inferInstance)).ne'
with ⟨m, rfl⟩
refine Nat.succ_le_succ <| ihn ⟨?_⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ (e.setValue 0 0 i.succ).pred (mt e.setValue_eq_iff.1 i.succ_ne_zero),
fun i j h ↦ ?_⟩
simpa only [pred_inj, EmbeddingLike.apply_eq_iff_eq, succ_inj] using h
lemma equiv_iff_eq : Nonempty (Fin m ≃ Fin n) ↔ m = n :=
⟨fun ⟨e⟩ ↦ le_antisymm (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e⟩) (nonempty_embedding_iff.1 ⟨e.symm⟩),
fun h ↦ h ▸ ⟨.refl _⟩⟩
@[simp] lemma castLE_castSucc {n m} (i : Fin n) (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
i.castSucc.castLE h = i.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_comp_castSucc {n m} (h : n + 1 ≤ m) :
Fin.castLE h ∘ Fin.castSucc = Fin.castLE (Nat.le_of_succ_le h) :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma castLE_rfl (n : ℕ) : Fin.castLE (le_refl n) = id :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_castLE {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) : Set.range (castLE h) = { i : Fin k | (i : ℕ) < n } :=
Set.ext fun x => ⟨fun ⟨y, hy⟩ => hy ▸ y.2, fun hx => ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castLE_symm {n k : ℕ} (h : n ≤ k) (i : Fin k) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective _ (castLE_injective h)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castLE h]
exact congr_arg Fin.val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
theorem leftInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : LeftInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
theorem rightInverse_cast (eq : n = m) : RightInverse (Fin.cast eq.symm) (Fin.cast eq) :=
fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_inj (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq = b.cast eq ↔ a = b := by
simp [← val_inj]
@[simp]
theorem cast_lt_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq < b.cast eq ↔ a < b :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem cast_le_cast (eq : n = m) {a b : Fin n} : a.cast eq ≤ b.cast eq ↔ a ≤ b :=
Iff.rfl
/-- The 'identity' equivalence between `Fin m` and `Fin n` when `m = n`. -/
@[simps]
def _root_.finCongr (eq : n = m) : Fin n ≃ Fin m where
toFun := Fin.cast eq
invFun := Fin.cast eq.symm
left_inv := leftInverse_cast eq
right_inv := rightInverse_cast eq
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_mk (h : m = n) (k : ℕ) (hk : k < m) :
finCongr h ⟨k, hk⟩ = ⟨k, h ▸ hk⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
lemma _root_.finCongr_refl (h : n = n := rfl) : finCongr h = Equiv.refl (Fin n) := by ext; simp
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_symm (h : m = n) : (finCongr h).symm = finCongr h.symm := rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.finCongr_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin m) : (finCongr h k : ℕ) = k := rfl
lemma _root_.finCongr_symm_apply_coe (h : m = n) (k : Fin n) : ((finCongr h).symm k : ℕ) = k := rfl
/-- While in many cases `finCongr` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
lemma _root_.finCongr_eq_equivCast (h : n = m) : finCongr h = .cast (h ▸ rfl) := by subst h; simp
/-- While in many cases `Fin.cast` is better than `Equiv.cast`/`cast`, sometimes we want to apply
a generic theorem about `cast`. -/
theorem cast_eq_cast (h : n = m) : (Fin.cast h : Fin n → Fin m) = _root_.cast (h ▸ rfl) := by
subst h
ext
rfl
/-- `Fin.castAdd` as an `Embedding`, `castAddEmb m i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+m)`.
See also `Fin.natAddEmb` and `Fin.addNatEmb`. -/
def castAddEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) := castLEEmb (le_add_right n m)
@[simp]
lemma coe_castAddEmb (m) : (castAddEmb m : Fin n → Fin (n + m)) = castAdd m := rfl
lemma castAddEmb_apply (m) (i : Fin n) : castAddEmb m i = castAdd m i := rfl
/-- `Fin.castSucc` as an `Embedding`, `castSuccEmb i` embeds `i : Fin n` in `Fin (n+1)`. -/
def castSuccEmb : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := castAddEmb _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_castSuccEmb : (castSuccEmb : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.castSucc := rfl
lemma castSuccEmb_apply (i : Fin n) : castSuccEmb i = i.castSucc := rfl
theorem castSucc_le_succ {n} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≤ i.succ := Nat.le_succ i
@[simp] theorem castSucc_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a ≤ b := .rfl
@[simp] theorem succ_le_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin n} : succ a ≤ castSucc b ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, succ_lt_succ_iff]
@[simp] theorem castSucc_lt_succ_iff {a b : Fin n} : castSucc a < succ b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, succ_le_succ_iff]
theorem le_of_castSucc_lt_of_succ_lt {a b : Fin (n + 1)} {i : Fin n}
(hl : castSucc i < a) (hu : b < succ i) : b < a := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt] at *; omega
theorem castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : castSucc i < p ∨ p < i.succ := by
simp [Fin.lt_def, -val_fin_lt]; omega
theorem succ_le_or_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : succ i ≤ p ∨ p ≤ i.castSucc := by
rw [le_castSucc_iff, ← castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
exact p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i
theorem eq_castSucc_of_ne_last {x : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ (last _)) :
∃ y, Fin.castSucc y = x := exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias exists_castSucc_eq_of_ne_last := eq_castSucc_of_ne_last
theorem forall_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∀ i, P i) ↔ (∀ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∧ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ => H _, H _⟩, fun ⟨H0, H1⟩ i => Fin.lastCases H1 H0 i⟩
-- to match `Fin.eq_zero_or_eq_succ`
theorem eq_castSucc_or_eq_last {n : Nat} (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
(∃ j : Fin n, i = j.castSucc) ∨ i = last n := i.lastCases (Or.inr rfl) (Or.inl ⟨·, rfl⟩)
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_ne_last {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : i.castSucc ≠ .last n :=
Fin.ne_of_lt i.castSucc_lt_last
theorem exists_fin_succ' {P : Fin (n + 1) → Prop} :
(∃ i, P i) ↔ (∃ i : Fin n, P i.castSucc) ∨ P (.last _) :=
⟨fun ⟨i, h⟩ => Fin.lastCases Or.inr (fun i hi => Or.inl ⟨i, hi⟩) i h,
fun h => h.elim (fun ⟨i, hi⟩ => ⟨i.castSucc, hi⟩) (fun h => ⟨.last _, h⟩)⟩
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_zero` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_zero' [NeZero n] : castSucc (0 : Fin n) = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_pos_iff [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : 0 < castSucc i ↔ 0 < i := by simp [← val_pos_iff]
/-- `castSucc i` is positive when `i` is positive.
The `Fin.castSucc_pos` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis. -/
alias ⟨_, castSucc_pos'⟩ := castSucc_pos_iff
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_eq_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_eq_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a = 0 ↔ a = 0 :=
Fin.ext_iff.trans <| (Fin.ext_iff.trans <| by simp).symm
/--
The `Fin.castSucc_ne_zero_iff` in `Lean` only applies in `Fin (n+1)`.
This one instead uses a `NeZero n` typeclass hypothesis.
-/
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_iff' [NeZero n] (a : Fin n) : castSucc a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| castSucc_eq_zero_iff' a
theorem castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : p < i) : castSucc i ≠ 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [castSucc_ne_zero_iff', Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((zero_le _).trans_lt h).ne'
theorem succ_ne_last_iff (a : Fin (n + 1)) : succ a ≠ last (n + 1) ↔ a ≠ last n :=
not_iff_not.mpr <| succ_eq_last_succ
theorem succ_ne_last_of_lt {p i : Fin n} (h : i < p) : succ i ≠ last n := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [succ_ne_last_iff, Ne, Fin.ext_iff]
exact ((le_last _).trans_lt' h).ne
@[norm_cast, simp]
theorem coe_eq_castSucc {a : Fin n} : (a : Fin (n + 1)) = castSucc a := by
ext
exact val_cast_of_lt (Nat.lt.step a.is_lt)
theorem coe_succ_lt_iff_lt {n : ℕ} {j k : Fin n} : (j : Fin <| n + 1) < k ↔ j < k := by
simp only [coe_eq_castSucc, castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff]
@[simp]
theorem range_castSucc {n : ℕ} : Set.range (castSucc : Fin n → Fin n.succ) =
({ i | (i : ℕ) < n } : Set (Fin n.succ)) := range_castLE (by omega)
@[simp]
theorem coe_of_injective_castSucc_symm {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n.succ) (hi) :
((Equiv.ofInjective castSucc (castSucc_injective _)).symm ⟨i, hi⟩ : ℕ) = i := by
rw [← coe_castSucc]
exact congr_arg val (Equiv.apply_ofInjective_symm _ _)
/-- `Fin.addNat` as an `Embedding`, `addNatEmb m i` adds `m` to `i`, generalizes `Fin.succ`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def addNatEmb (m) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := (addNat · m)
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
/-- `Fin.natAdd` as an `Embedding`, `natAddEmb n i` adds `n` to `i` "on the left". -/
@[simps! apply]
def natAddEmb (n) {m} : Fin m ↪ Fin (n + m) where
toFun := natAdd n
inj' a b := by simp [Fin.ext_iff]
theorem castSucc_castAdd (i : Fin n) : castSucc (castAdd m i) = castAdd (m + 1) i := rfl
theorem castSucc_natAdd (i : Fin m) : castSucc (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (castSucc i) := rfl
theorem succ_castAdd (i : Fin n) : succ (castAdd m i) =
if h : i.succ = last _ then natAdd n (0 : Fin (m + 1))
else castAdd (m + 1) ⟨i.1 + 1, lt_of_le_of_ne i.2 (Fin.val_ne_iff.mpr h)⟩ := by
split_ifs with h
exacts [Fin.ext (congr_arg Fin.val h :), rfl]
theorem succ_natAdd (i : Fin m) : succ (natAdd n i) = natAdd n (succ i) := rfl
end Succ
section Pred
/-!
### pred
-/
theorem pred_one' [NeZero n] (h := (zero_ne_one' (n := n)).symm) :
Fin.pred (1 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, coe_pred, val_one', val_zero, Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, Nat.mod_le]
theorem pred_last (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne') :
pred (last (n + 1)) h = last n := by simp_rw [← succ_last, pred_succ]
theorem pred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi < j ↔ i < succ j := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem lt_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j < pred i hi ↔ succ j < i := by
rw [← succ_lt_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem pred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : pred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ succ j := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem le_pred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) : j ≤ pred i hi ↔ succ j ≤ i := by
rw [← succ_le_succ_iff, succ_pred]
theorem castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0)
(ha' := castSucc_ne_zero_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc = (castSucc a).pred ha' := rfl
theorem castSucc_pred_add_one_eq {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
(a.pred ha).castSucc + 1 = a := by
cases a using cases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [pred_succ, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem le_pred_castSucc_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ (castSucc a).pred ha ↔ b < a := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [pred_lt_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem pred_castSucc_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : castSucc a ≠ 0) :
(castSucc a).pred ha < a := by rw [pred_castSucc_lt_iff, le_def]
theorem le_castSucc_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
b ≤ castSucc (a.pred ha) ↔ b < a := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, le_pred_castSucc_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < b ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc, pred_castSucc_lt_iff]
theorem castSucc_pred_lt {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
castSucc (a.pred ha) < a := by rw [castSucc_pred_lt_iff, le_def]
end Pred
section CastPred
/-- `castPred i` sends `i : Fin (n + 1)` to `Fin n` as long as i ≠ last n. -/
@[inline] def castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) : Fin n := castLT i (val_lt_last h)
@[simp]
lemma castLT_eq_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < last _) (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 h.ne) :
castLT i h = castPred i h' := rfl
@[simp]
lemma coe_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last _) : (castPred i h : ℕ) = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_castSucc {i : Fin n} (h' := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 (castSucc_lt_last i).ne) :
castPred (castSucc i) h' = i := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castSucc_castPred (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≠ last n) :
castSucc (i.castPred h) = i := by
rcases exists_castSucc_eq.mpr h with ⟨y, rfl⟩
rw [castPred_castSucc]
theorem castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc (i : Fin (n + 1)) (hi : i ≠ last _) (j : Fin n) :
castPred i hi = j ↔ i = castSucc j :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, castSucc_castPred], fun h => by simp_rw [h, castPred_castSucc]⟩
@[simp]
theorem castPred_mk (i : ℕ) (h₁ : i < n) (h₂ := h₁.trans (Nat.lt_succ_self _))
(h₃ : ⟨i, h₂⟩ ≠ last _ := (ne_iff_vne _ _).mpr (val_last _ ▸ h₁.ne)) :
castPred ⟨i, h₂⟩ h₃ = ⟨i, h₁⟩ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_le_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi ≤ castPred j hj ↔ i ≤ j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_le_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i ≤ j` and `j ≠ last n`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_le_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≤ j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (by rw [← lt_last_iff_ne_last] at hj ⊢; exact Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h hj) ≤
castPred j hj :=
h
@[simp]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred_iff {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi < castPred j hj ↔ i < j := Iff.rfl
/-- A version of the right-to-left implication of `castPred_lt_castPred_iff`
that deduces `i ≠ last n` from `i < j`. -/
@[gcongr]
theorem castPred_lt_castPred {i j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i < j) (hj : j ≠ last n) :
castPred i (ne_last_of_lt h) < castPred j hj := h
theorem castPred_lt_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi < j ↔ i < castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem lt_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j < castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j < i := by
rw [← castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem castPred_le_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
castPred i hi ≤ j ↔ i ≤ castSucc j := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
theorem le_castPred_iff {j : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ last n) :
j ≤ castPred i hi ↔ castSucc j ≤ i := by
rw [← castSucc_le_castSucc_iff, castSucc_castPred]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_inj {i j : Fin (n + 1)} {hi : i ≠ last n} {hj : j ≠ last n} :
castPred i hi = castPred j hj ↔ i = j := by
simp_rw [Fin.ext_iff, le_antisymm_iff, ← le_def, castPred_le_castPred_iff]
theorem castPred_zero' [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos'.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 1)) h = 0 := rfl
theorem castPred_zero (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 last_pos.ne) :
castPred (0 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem castPred_eq_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ last n) :
Fin.castPred i h = 0 ↔ i = 0 := by
rw [← castPred_zero', castPred_inj]
@[simp]
theorem castPred_one [NeZero n] (h := Fin.ext_iff.not.2 one_lt_last.ne) :
castPred (1 : Fin (n + 2)) h = 1 := by
cases n
· exact subsingleton_one.elim _ 1
· rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n)
(ha' := a.succ_ne_last_iff.mpr ha) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = (succ a).castPred ha' := rfl
theorem succ_castPred_eq_add_one {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
(a.castPred ha).succ = a + 1 := by
cases a using lastCases
· exact (ha rfl).elim
· rw [castPred_castSucc, coeSucc_eq_succ]
theorem castpred_succ_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
(succ a).castPred ha ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [castPred_le_iff, succ_le_castSucc_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
b < (succ a).castPred ha ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_lt_succ_iff]
theorem lt_castPred_succ {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : succ a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a < (succ a).castPred ha := by rw [lt_castPred_succ_iff, le_def]
theorem succ_castPred_le_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
succ (a.castPred ha) ≤ b ↔ a < b := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, castpred_succ_le_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
b < succ (a.castPred ha) ↔ b ≤ a := by
rw [succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ ha, lt_castPred_succ_iff]
theorem lt_succ_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) :
a < succ (a.castPred ha) := by rw [lt_succ_castPred_iff, le_def]
theorem castPred_le_pred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last n) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
castPred a ha ≤ pred b hb ↔ a < b := by
rw [le_pred_iff, succ_castPred_le_iff]
theorem pred_lt_castPred_iff {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ last n) :
pred a ha < castPred b hb ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [lt_castPred_iff, castSucc_pred_lt_iff ha]
theorem pred_lt_castPred {a : Fin (n + 1)} (h₁ : a ≠ 0) (h₂ : a ≠ last n) :
pred a h₁ < castPred a h₂ := by
rw [pred_lt_castPred_iff, le_def]
end CastPred
section SuccAbove
variable {p : Fin (n + 1)} {i j : Fin n}
/-- `succAbove p i` embeds `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p`. -/
def succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : Fin (n + 1) :=
if castSucc i < p then i.castSucc else i.succ
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `castSucc` when the resulting `i.castSucc < p`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : castSucc i < p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i := if_pos h
lemma succAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : succ i ≤ p) :
p.succAbove i = castSucc i :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
embeds `i` by `succ` when the resulting `p < i.succ`. -/
lemma succAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ castSucc i) :
p.succAbove i = i.succ := if_neg (Fin.not_lt.2 h)
lemma succAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : p < succ i) :
p.succAbove i = succ i := succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) : succAbove p.succ i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)
lemma succAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : succAbove p.succ i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_succ_self (j : Fin n) : j.succ.succAbove j = j.castSucc :=
succAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.castSucc :=
succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)
lemma succAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : succAbove p.castSucc i = i.succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.2 h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_castSucc_self (j : Fin n) : succAbove j.castSucc j = j.succ :=
succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma succAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt p.zero_le h) : succAbove p (i.pred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h), succ_pred]
lemma succAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hi : i ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (i.pred hi) = (i.pred hi).castSucc := succAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)
@[simp] lemma succAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ 0) :
succAbove p (p.pred h) = (p.pred h).castSucc := succAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_lt_of_le h p.le_last) : succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = i := by
rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h), castSucc_castPred]
lemma succAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hi : i ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (i.castPred hi) = (i.castPred hi).succ :=
succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)
lemma succAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≠ last n) :
succAbove p (p.castPred h) = (p.castPred h).succ := succAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl h
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `p : Fin (n + 1)`
never results in `p` itself -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p.succAbove i ≠ p := by
rcases p.castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ i with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_lt h
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h]
exact Fin.ne_of_gt h
@[simp]
lemma ne_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) : p ≠ p.succAbove i := (succAbove_ne _ _).symm
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_injective : Injective p.succAbove := by
rintro i j hij
unfold succAbove at hij
split_ifs at hij with hi hj hj
· exact castSucc_injective _ hij
· rw [hij] at hi
cases hj <| Nat.lt_trans j.castSucc_lt_succ hi
· rw [← hij] at hj
cases hi <| Nat.lt_trans i.castSucc_lt_succ hj
· exact succ_injective _ hij
/-- Given a fixed pivot `p : Fin (n + 1)`, `p.succAbove` is injective. -/
lemma succAbove_right_inj : p.succAbove i = p.succAbove j ↔ i = j :=
succAbove_right_injective.eq_iff
/-- `Fin.succAbove p` as an `Embedding`. -/
@[simps!]
def succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n ↪ Fin (n + 1) := ⟨p.succAbove, succAbove_right_injective⟩
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_succAboveEmb (p : Fin (n + 1)) : p.succAboveEmb = p.succAbove := rfl
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) : a.succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rw [Fin.succAbove_of_castSucc_lt]
· exact castSucc_zero'
· exact Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 ha
lemma succAbove_eq_zero_iff [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b = 0 ↔ b = 0 := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_zero_zero ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_zero [NeZero n] {a : Fin (n + 1)} {b : Fin n} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a.succAbove b ≠ 0 := mt (succAbove_eq_zero_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around zero embeds by `succ`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_zero : succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1)) = Fin.succ := rfl
lemma succAbove_zero_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove 0 i = succ i := by rw [succAbove_zero]
@[simp] lemma succAbove_ne_last_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} (h : a ≠ last (n + 1)) :
a.succAbove (last n) = last (n + 1) := by
rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_last _ ▸ lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 h), succ_last]
lemma succAbove_eq_last_iff {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b = last _ ↔ b = last _ := by
rw [← succAbove_ne_last_last ha, succAbove_right_inj]
lemma succAbove_ne_last {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last _) (hb : b ≠ last _) :
a.succAbove b ≠ last _ := mt (succAbove_eq_last_iff ha).mp hb
/-- Embedding `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a hole around `last n` embeds by `castSucc`. -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_last : succAbove (last n) = castSucc := by
ext; simp only [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_last]
lemma succAbove_last_apply (i : Fin n) : succAbove (last n) i = castSucc i := by rw [succAbove_last]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is greater
results in a value that is less than `p`. -/
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ castSucc i < p := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rwa [iff_true_right H, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
· rw [castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le, iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
lemma succAbove_lt_iff_succ_le (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p.succAbove i < p ↔ succ i ≤ p := by
rw [succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt, castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le]
/-- Embedding `i : Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` using a pivot `p` that is lesser
results in a value that is greater than `p`. -/
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p ≤ castSucc i := by
rcases castSucc_lt_or_lt_succ p i with H | H
· rw [iff_false_right (Fin.not_le.2 H), succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H]
exact Fin.not_lt.2 <| Fin.le_of_lt H
· rwa [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ H, iff_true_left H, le_castSucc_iff]
lemma lt_succAbove_iff_lt_castSucc (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) :
p < p.succAbove i ↔ p < succ i := by rw [lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc, le_castSucc_iff]
/-- Embedding a positive `Fin n` results in a positive `Fin (n + 1)` -/
lemma succAbove_pos [NeZero n] (p : Fin (n + 1)) (i : Fin n) (h : 0 < i) : 0 < p.succAbove i := by
by_cases H : castSucc i < p
· simpa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ H] using castSucc_pos' h
· simp [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.not_lt.1 H)]
lemma castPred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc x < y)
(h' := Fin.ne_last_of_lt <| (succAbove_lt_iff_castSucc_lt ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).castPred h' = x := by
rw [castPred_eq_iff_eq_castSucc, succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h]
lemma pred_succAbove (x : Fin n) (y : Fin (n + 1)) (h : y ≤ castSucc x)
(h' := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt <| (lt_succAbove_iff_le_castSucc ..).2 h) :
(y.succAbove x).pred h' = x := by simp only [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, pred_succ]
lemma exists_succAbove_eq {x y : Fin (n + 1)} (h : x ≠ y) : ∃ z, y.succAbove z = x := by
obtain hxy | hyx := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
exacts [⟨_, succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ hxy⟩, ⟨_, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ hyx⟩]
@[simp] lemma exists_succAbove_eq_iff {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : (∃ z, x.succAbove z = y) ↔ y ≠ x :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩; exact succAbove_ne _ _, exists_succAbove_eq⟩
/-- The range of `p.succAbove` is everything except `p`. -/
@[simp] lemma range_succAbove (p : Fin (n + 1)) : Set.range p.succAbove = {p}ᶜ :=
Set.ext fun _ => exists_succAbove_eq_iff
@[simp] lemma range_succ (n : ℕ) : Set.range (Fin.succ : Fin n → Fin (n + 1)) = {0}ᶜ := by
rw [← succAbove_zero]; exact range_succAbove (0 : Fin (n + 1))
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
lemma succAbove_left_injective : Injective (@succAbove n) := fun _ _ h => by
simpa [range_succAbove] using congr_arg (fun f : Fin n → Fin (n + 1) => (Set.range f)ᶜ) h
/-- `succAbove` is injective at the pivot -/
@[simp] lemma succAbove_left_inj {x y : Fin (n + 1)} : x.succAbove = y.succAbove ↔ x = y :=
succAbove_left_injective.eq_iff
@[simp] lemma zero_succAbove {n : ℕ} (i : Fin n) : (0 : Fin (n + 1)).succAbove i = i.succ := rfl
lemma succ_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin n) : succAbove i.succ 0 = 0 := by simp
/-- `succ` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (i : Fin (n + 1)) (j : Fin n) :
i.succ.succAbove j.succ = (i.succAbove j).succ := by
obtain h | h := i.lt_or_le (succ j)
· rw [succAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h]
· rwa [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_succ_of_le, succ_castSucc]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
@[simp]
lemma castSucc_succAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} {i : Fin (n + 1)} {j : Fin n} :
i.castSucc.succAbove j.castSucc = (i.succAbove j).castSucc := by
rcases i.le_or_lt (castSucc j) with (h | h)
· rw [succAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, succ_castSucc]
· rw [succAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- `pred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma pred_succAbove_pred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hk := succAbove_ne_zero ha hb) :
(a.pred ha).succAbove (b.pred hb) = (a.succAbove b).pred hk := by
simp_rw [← succ_inj (b := pred (succAbove a b) hk), ← succ_succAbove_succ, succ_pred]
/-- `castPred` commutes with `succAbove`. -/
lemma castPred_succAbove_castPred {a : Fin (n + 2)} {b : Fin (n + 1)} (ha : a ≠ last (n + 1))
(hb : b ≠ last n) (hk := succAbove_ne_last ha hb) :
(a.castPred ha).succAbove (b.castPred hb) = (a.succAbove b).castPred hk := by
simp_rw [← castSucc_inj (b := (a.succAbove b).castPred hk), ← castSucc_succAbove_castSucc,
castSucc_castPred]
lemma one_succAbove_zero {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove 0 = 0 := by
rfl
/-- By moving `succ` to the outside of this expression, we create opportunities for further
simplification using `succAbove_zero` or `succ_succAbove_zero`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} [NeZero n] (i : Fin (n + 1)) :
i.succ.succAbove 1 = (i.succAbove 0).succ := by
rw [← succ_zero_eq_one']; convert succ_succAbove_succ i 0
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_succ {n : ℕ} (j : Fin n) :
(1 : Fin (n + 2)).succAbove j.succ = j.succ.succ := by
have := succ_succAbove_succ 0 j; rwa [succ_zero_eq_one, zero_succAbove] at this
@[simp] lemma one_succAbove_one {n : ℕ} : (1 : Fin (n + 3)).succAbove 1 = 2 := by
simpa only [succ_zero_eq_one, val_zero, zero_succAbove, succ_one_eq_two]
using succ_succAbove_succ (0 : Fin (n + 2)) (0 : Fin (n + 2))
end SuccAbove
section PredAbove
/-- `predAbove p i` surjects `i : Fin (n+1)` into `Fin n` by subtracting one if `p < i`. -/
def predAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : Fin n :=
if h : castSucc p < i
then pred i (Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
else castPred i (Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (Fin.not_lt.1 h) (castSucc_lt_last _))
lemma predAbove_of_le_castSucc (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ castSucc p)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| castSucc_lt_last _) :
p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi := dif_neg <| Fin.not_lt.2 h
lemma predAbove_of_lt_succ (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < succ p)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.castPred hi :=
predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_of_castSucc_lt (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : castSucc p < i)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := dif_pos h
lemma predAbove_of_succ_le (p : Fin n) (i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : succ p ≤ i)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (succ_pos _) h) :
p.predAbove i = i.pred hi := predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_iff_succ_le.mpr h)
lemma predAbove_succ_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : i < p) (hi := succ_ne_last_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (succ i) = (i.succ).castPred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_lt_succ_iff.mpr h)]
lemma predAbove_succ_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : p ≤ i) : p.predAbove (succ i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_le_succ_iff.mpr h), pred_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_succ_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (succ p) = p :=
predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_lt (p i : Fin n) (h : p < i) (hi := castSucc_ne_zero_of_lt h) :
p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i.castSucc.pred hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_castSucc_iff.2 h)]
lemma predAbove_castSucc_of_le (p i : Fin n) (h : i ≤ p) : p.predAbove (castSucc i) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr h), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_castSucc_self (p : Fin n) : p.predAbove (castSucc p) = p :=
predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl
lemma predAbove_pred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i < p) (hp := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h) : (pred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p ≤ i) (hp : p ≠ 0)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_gt <| Fin.lt_of_lt_of_le (Fin.pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hp) h) :
(pred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by rw [predAbove_of_succ_le _ _ (succ_pred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_pred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ 0) : (pred p hp).predAbove p = pred p hp :=
predAbove_pred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_lt (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : p < i) (hp := Fin.ne_last_of_lt h)
(hi := Fin.ne_zero_of_lt h) : (castPred p hp).predAbove i = pred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_of_le (p i : Fin (n + 1)) (h : i ≤ p) (hp : p ≠ last n)
(hi := Fin.ne_of_lt <| Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt h <| Fin.lt_last_iff_ne_last.2 hp) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove i = castPred i hi := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_castPred _ _ ▸ h)]
lemma predAbove_castPred_self (p : Fin (n + 1)) (hp : p ≠ last n) :
(castPred p hp).predAbove p = castPred p hp := predAbove_castPred_of_le _ _ Fin.le_rfl hp
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove (i : Fin n) 0 = 0 := by
cases n
· exact i.elim0
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (zero_le _), castPred_zero]
lemma predAbove_zero_succ [NeZero n] {i : Fin n} : predAbove 0 i.succ = i := by
rw [predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ (Fin.zero_le' _)]
@[simp]
lemma succ_predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {j : Fin (n + 1)} (h : j ≠ 0) : succ (predAbove 0 j) = j := by
rcases exists_succ_eq_of_ne_zero h with ⟨k, rfl⟩
rw [predAbove_zero_succ]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} (hi : i ≠ 0) :
predAbove 0 i = i.pred hi := by
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := exists_succ_eq.2 hi; exact predAbove_zero_succ
lemma predAbove_zero [NeZero n] {i : Fin (n + 1)} :
predAbove (0 : Fin n) i = if hi : i = 0 then 0 else i.pred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_zero]
· rw [predAbove_zero_of_ne_zero hi]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_right_last {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove i (last (n + 1)) = last n := by
rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (castSucc_lt_last _), pred_last]
lemma predAbove_last_castSucc {i : Fin (n + 1)} : predAbove (last n) (i.castSucc) = i := by
rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (castSucc_le_castSucc_iff.mpr (le_last _)), castPred_castSucc]
@[simp] lemma predAbove_last_of_ne_last {i : Fin (n + 2)} (hi : i ≠ last (n + 1)) :
predAbove (last n) i = castPred i hi := by
rw [← exists_castSucc_eq] at hi
rcases hi with ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact predAbove_last_castSucc
lemma predAbove_last_apply {i : Fin (n + 2)} :
predAbove (last n) i = if hi : i = last _ then last _ else i.castPred hi := by
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hi, predAbove_right_last]
· rw [predAbove_last_of_ne_last hi]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p` is the identity away from `p`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succAbove_predAbove {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ castSucc p) :
p.castSucc.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (Fin.le_of_lt h), succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin (n+1)` to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p`
then back to `Fin (n+1)` with a gap around `p.succ` is the identity away from `p.succ`. -/
@[simp]
lemma succ_succAbove_predAbove {n : ℕ} {p : Fin n} {i : Fin (n + 1)} (h : i ≠ p.succ) :
p.succ.succAbove (p.predAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := Fin.lt_or_lt_of_ne h
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ (le_castSucc_iff.2 h),
succAbove_castPred_of_lt _ _ h]
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ (Fin.lt_of_le_of_lt (p.castSucc_le_succ) h),
succAbove_pred_of_lt _ _ h]
/-- Sending `Fin n` into `Fin (n + 1)` with a gap at `p`
then back to `Fin n` by subtracting one from anything above `p` is the identity. -/
@[simp]
lemma predAbove_succAbove (p : Fin n) (i : Fin n) : p.predAbove ((castSucc p).succAbove i) = i := by
obtain h | h := p.le_or_lt i
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h]
· rw [succAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ <| Fin.le_of_lt h]
/-- `succ` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma succ_predAbove_succ (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.succ.predAbove b.succ = (a.predAbove b).succ := by
obtain h | h := Fin.le_or_lt (succ a) b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_le _ _ h, succ_pred]
· rw [predAbove_of_lt_succ _ _ h, predAbove_succ_of_lt _ _ h, succ_castPred_eq_castPred_succ]
/-- `castSucc` commutes with `predAbove`. -/
@[simp] lemma castSucc_predAbove_castSucc {n : ℕ} (a : Fin n) (b : Fin (n + 1)) :
a.castSucc.predAbove b.castSucc = (a.predAbove b).castSucc := by
obtain h | h := a.castSucc.lt_or_le b
· rw [predAbove_of_castSucc_lt _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_lt _ _ h,
castSucc_pred_eq_pred_castSucc]
· rw [predAbove_of_le_castSucc _ _ h, predAbove_castSucc_of_le _ _ h, castSucc_castPred]
end PredAbove
section DivMod
/-- Compute `i / n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin m :=
⟨i / n, Nat.div_lt_of_lt_mul <| Nat.mul_comm m n ▸ i.prop⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_divNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.divNat : ℕ) = i / n :=
rfl
/-- Compute `i % n`, where `n` is a `Nat` and inferred the type of `i`. -/
def modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : Fin n := ⟨i % n, Nat.mod_lt _ <| Nat.pos_of_mul_pos_left i.pos⟩
@[simp]
theorem coe_modNat (i : Fin (m * n)) : (i.modNat : ℕ) = i % n :=
rfl
theorem modNat_rev (i : Fin (m * n)) : i.rev.modNat = i.modNat.rev := by
ext
have H₁ : i % n + 1 ≤ n := i.modNat.is_lt
have H₂ : i / n < m := i.divNat.is_lt
simp only [coe_modNat, val_rev]
calc
(m * n - (i + 1)) % n = (m * n - ((i / n) * n + i % n + 1)) % n := by rw [Nat.div_add_mod']
_ = ((m - i / n - 1) * n + (n - (i % n + 1))) % n := by
rw [Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.one_mul, Nat.sub_add_sub_cancel _ H₁,
Nat.mul_sub_right_distrib, Nat.sub_sub, Nat.add_assoc]
exact Nat.le_mul_of_pos_left _ <| Nat.le_sub_of_add_le' H₂
_ = n - (i % n + 1) := by
rw [Nat.mul_comm, Nat.mul_add_mod, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]; exact i.modNat.rev.is_lt
end DivMod
section Rec
/-!
### recursion and induction principles
-/
end Rec
open scoped Relator in
theorem liftFun_iff_succ {α : Type*} (r : α → α → Prop) [IsTrans α r] {f : Fin (n + 1) → α} :
((· < ·) ⇒ r) f f ↔ ∀ i : Fin n, r (f (castSucc i)) (f i.succ) := by
constructor
· intro H i
exact H i.castSucc_lt_succ
· refine fun H i => Fin.induction (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· simp [le_def] at h
· intro j ihj hij
rw [← le_castSucc_iff] at hij
obtain hij | hij := (le_def.1 hij).eq_or_lt
· obtain rfl := Fin.ext hij
exact H _
· exact _root_.trans (ihj hij) (H j)
section AddGroup
open Nat Int
/-- Negation on `Fin n` -/
instance neg (n : ℕ) : Neg (Fin n) :=
⟨fun a => ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩⟩
theorem neg_def (a : Fin n) : -a = ⟨(n - a) % n, Nat.mod_lt _ a.pos⟩ := rfl
protected theorem coe_neg (a : Fin n) : ((-a : Fin n) : ℕ) = (n - a) % n :=
rfl
theorem eq_zero (n : Fin 1) : n = 0 := Subsingleton.elim _ _
lemma eq_one_of_ne_zero (i : Fin 2) (hi : i ≠ 0) : i = 1 := by fin_omega
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias eq_one_of_neq_zero := eq_one_of_ne_zero
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : Fin (n + 1)) = n := by
cases n
· simp
rw [Fin.coe_neg, Fin.val_one, Nat.add_one_sub_one, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt]
constructor
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Basic.lean | 1,406 | 1,410 | theorem last_sub (i : Fin (n + 1)) : last n - i = Fin.rev i :=
Fin.ext <| by rw [coe_sub_iff_le.2 i.le_last, val_last, val_rev, Nat.succ_sub_succ_eq_sub]
theorem add_one_le_of_lt {n : ℕ} {a b : Fin (n + 1)} (h : a < b) : a + 1 ≤ b := by | cases n <;> fin_omega |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Single
/-!
# Building finitely supported functions off finsets
This file defines `Finsupp.indicator` to help create finsupps from finsets.
## Main declarations
* `Finsupp.indicator`: Turns a map from a `Finset` into a `Finsupp` from the entire type.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset Function
variable {ι α : Type*}
namespace Finsupp
variable [Zero α] {s : Finset ι} (f : ∀ i ∈ s, α) {i : ι}
/-- Create an element of `ι →₀ α` from a finset `s` and a function `f` defined on this finset. -/
def indicator (s : Finset ι) (f : ∀ i ∈ s, α) : ι →₀ α where
toFun i :=
haveI := Classical.decEq ι
if H : i ∈ s then f i H else 0
support :=
haveI := Classical.decEq α
({i | f i.1 i.2 ≠ 0} : Finset s).map (Embedding.subtype _)
mem_support_toFun i := by
classical simp
theorem indicator_of_mem (hi : i ∈ s) (f : ∀ i ∈ s, α) : indicator s f i = f i hi :=
@dif_pos _ (id _) hi _ _ _
theorem indicator_of_not_mem (hi : i ∉ s) (f : ∀ i ∈ s, α) : indicator s f i = 0 :=
@dif_neg _ (id _) hi _ _ _
variable (s i)
@[simp]
theorem indicator_apply [DecidableEq ι] : indicator s f i = if hi : i ∈ s then f i hi else 0 := by
simp only [indicator, ne_eq, coe_mk]
congr
theorem indicator_injective : Injective fun f : ∀ i ∈ s, α => indicator s f := by
intro a b h
ext i hi
rw [← indicator_of_mem hi a, ← indicator_of_mem hi b]
exact DFunLike.congr_fun h i
| Mathlib/Data/Finsupp/Indicator.lean | 59 | 63 | theorem support_indicator_subset : ((indicator s f).support : Set ι) ⊆ s := by | intro i hi
rw [mem_coe, mem_support_iff] at hi
by_contra h
exact hi (indicator_of_not_mem h _) |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Violeta Hernández Palacios, Grayson Burton, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Antisymmetrization
import Mathlib.Order.Hom.WithTopBot
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.WithBotTop
/-!
# The covering relation
This file proves properties of the covering relation in an order.
We say that `b` *covers* `a` if `a < b` and there is no element in between.
We say that `b` *weakly covers* `a` if `a ≤ b` and there is no element between `a` and `b`.
In a partial order this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ a = b`,
in a preorder this is equivalent to `a ⋖ b ∨ (a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a)`
## Notation
* `a ⋖ b` means that `b` covers `a`.
* `a ⩿ b` means that `b` weakly covers `a`.
-/
open Set OrderDual
variable {α β : Type*}
section WeaklyCovers
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.le (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1
theorem WCovBy.refl (a : α) : a ⩿ a :=
⟨le_rfl, fun _ hc => hc.not_lt⟩
@[simp] lemma WCovBy.rfl : a ⩿ a := WCovBy.refl a
protected theorem Eq.wcovBy (h : a = b) : a ⩿ b :=
h ▸ WCovBy.rfl
theorem wcovBy_of_le_of_le (h1 : a ≤ b) (h2 : b ≤ a) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h1, fun _ hac hcb => (hac.trans hcb).not_le h2⟩
alias LE.le.wcovBy_of_le := wcovBy_of_le_of_le
theorem AntisymmRel.wcovBy (h : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ b :=
wcovBy_of_le_of_le h.1 h.2
theorem WCovBy.wcovBy_iff_le (hab : a ⩿ b) : b ⩿ a ↔ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => h.le, fun h => h.wcovBy_of_le hab.le⟩
theorem wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a ≤ b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_wcovBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⩿ c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans hbc.le, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⩿ c ↔ b ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_wcovBy, hab.trans_wcovBy⟩
theorem WCovBy.trans_antisymm_rel (hab : a ⩿ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⩿ c :=
⟨hab.le.trans hbc.1, fun _ had hdc => hab.2 had <| hdc.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⩿ a ↔ c ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymm_rel hab.symm⟩
/-- If `a ≤ b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_wcovBy_iff (h : a ≤ b) : ¬a ⩿ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [WCovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
instance WCovBy.isRefl : IsRefl α (· ⩿ ·) :=
⟨WCovBy.refl⟩
theorem WCovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h.2 hx.1 hx.2
theorem wcovBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⩿ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma WCovBy.of_le_of_le' (hac : a ⩿ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem WCovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⩿ f b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨f.le_iff_le.mp h.le, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem WCovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⩿ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⩿ f b := by
refine ⟨f.monotone hab.le, fun c ha hb => ?_⟩
obtain ⟨c, rfl⟩ := h.out (mem_range_self _) (mem_range_self _) ⟨ha.le, hb.le⟩
rw [f.lt_iff_lt] at ha hb
exact hab.2 ha hb
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⩿ f b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
⟨fun h2 => h2.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_wcovBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⩿ e b ↔ a ⩿ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_wcovBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
@[simp]
theorem toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⩿ toDual a ↔ a ⩿ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⩿ ofDual b ↔ b ⩿ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_wcovBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, WCovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_wcovBy_ofDual_iff
theorem OrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⩿ f y) : x ⩿ y := by
use f.le_iff_le.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_wcovBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⩿ f y ↔ x ⩿ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.wcovBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b := by
rcases h2.eq_or_lt with (h2 | h2); · exact Or.inl h2.symm
rcases h3.eq_or_lt with (h3 | h3); · exact Or.inr h3
exact (h.2 h2 h3).elim
/-- An `iff` version of `WCovBy.eq_or_eq` and `wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem wcovBy_iff_le_and_eq_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.le, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem WCovBy.le_and_le_iff (h : a ⩿ b) : a ≤ c ∧ c ≤ b ↔ c = a ∨ c = b := by
refine ⟨fun h2 => h.eq_or_eq h2.1 h2.2, ?_⟩; rintro (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨le_rfl, h.le⟩, ⟨h.le, le_rfl⟩]
theorem WCovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⩿ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} := by
ext c
exact h.le_and_le_iff
theorem WCovBy.Ico_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ico a b ⊆ {a} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_right, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff, pair_comm]
theorem WCovBy.Ioc_subset (h : a ⩿ b) : Ioc a b ⊆ {b} := by
rw [← Icc_diff_left, h.Icc_eq, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
end PartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.sup_eq (hac : a ⩿ c) (hbc : b ⩿ c) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊔ b = c :=
(sup_le hac.le hbc.le).eq_of_not_lt fun h =>
hab.lt_sup_or_lt_sup.elim (fun h' => hac.2 h' h) fun h' => hbc.2 h' h
end SemilatticeSup
section SemilatticeInf
variable [SemilatticeInf α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.inf_eq (hca : c ⩿ a) (hcb : c ⩿ b) (hab : a ≠ b) : a ⊓ b = c :=
(le_inf hca.le hcb.le).eq_of_not_gt fun h => hab.inf_lt_or_inf_lt.elim (hca.2 h) (hcb.2 h)
end SemilatticeInf
end WeaklyCovers
section LT
variable [LT α] {a b : α}
theorem CovBy.lt (h : a ⋖ b) : a < b :=
h.1
/-- If `a < b`, then `b` does not cover `a` iff there's an element in between. -/
theorem not_covBy_iff (h : a < b) : ¬a ⋖ b ↔ ∃ c, a < c ∧ c < b := by
simp_rw [CovBy, h, true_and, not_forall, exists_prop, not_not]
alias ⟨exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy, _⟩ := not_covBy_iff
alias LT.lt.exists_lt_lt := exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy
/-- In a dense order, nothing covers anything. -/
theorem not_covBy [DenselyOrdered α] : ¬a ⋖ b := fun h =>
let ⟨_, hc⟩ := exists_between h.1
h.2 hc.1 hc.2
theorem denselyOrdered_iff_forall_not_covBy : DenselyOrdered α ↔ ∀ a b : α, ¬a ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h _ _ => @not_covBy _ _ _ _ h, fun h =>
⟨fun _ _ hab => exists_lt_lt_of_not_covBy hab <| h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem toDual_covBy_toDual_iff : toDual b ⋖ toDual a ↔ a ⋖ b :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff {a b : αᵒᵈ} : ofDual a ⋖ ofDual b ↔ b ⋖ a :=
and_congr_right' <| forall_congr' fun _ => forall_swap
alias ⟨_, CovBy.toDual⟩ := toDual_covBy_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, CovBy.ofDual⟩ := ofDual_covBy_ofDual_iff
end LT
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.le (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≤ b :=
h.1.le
protected theorem CovBy.ne (h : a ⋖ b) : a ≠ b :=
h.lt.ne
theorem CovBy.ne' (h : a ⋖ b) : b ≠ a :=
h.lt.ne'
protected theorem CovBy.wcovBy (h : a ⋖ b) : a ⩿ b :=
⟨h.le, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_not_le (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : ¬b ≤ a) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_not_le h2, h.2⟩
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_lt (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a < b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h2, h.2⟩
lemma CovBy.of_le_of_lt (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b < c) : b ⋖ c :=
⟨hbc, fun _x hbx hxc ↦ hac.2 (hab.trans_lt hbx) hxc⟩
lemma CovBy.of_lt_of_le (hac : a ⋖ c) (hab : a < b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun _x hax hxb ↦ hac.2 hax <| hxb.trans_le hbc⟩
theorem not_covBy_of_lt_of_lt (h₁ : a < b) (h₂ : b < c) : ¬a ⋖ c :=
(not_covBy_iff (h₁.trans h₂)).2 ⟨b, h₁, h₂⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a < b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_lt h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ ¬b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.lt.not_le⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_not_le h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a ≤ b ∧ b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h => or_iff_not_imp_right.mpr fun h' => h.covBy_of_not_le fun hba => h' ⟨h.le, hba⟩,
fun h' => h'.elim (fun h => h.wcovBy) fun h => h.1.wcovBy_of_le h.2⟩
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_le_and_le, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le
theorem AntisymmRel.trans_covBy (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.1.trans_lt hbc.lt, fun _ had hdc => hbc.2 (hab.2.trans_lt had) hdc⟩
theorem covBy_congr_left (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : a ⋖ c ↔ b ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.symm.trans_covBy, hab.trans_covBy⟩
theorem CovBy.trans_antisymmRel (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) b c) : a ⋖ c :=
⟨hab.lt.trans_le hbc.1, fun _ had hdb => hab.2 had <| hdb.trans_le hbc.2⟩
theorem covBy_congr_right (hab : AntisymmRel (· ≤ ·) a b) : c ⋖ a ↔ c ⋖ b :=
⟨fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab, fun h => h.trans_antisymmRel hab.symm⟩
instance : IsNonstrictStrictOrder α (· ⩿ ·) (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ _ =>
covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_not_le.trans <| and_congr_right fun h => h.wcovBy_iff_le.not.symm⟩
instance CovBy.isIrrefl : IsIrrefl α (· ⋖ ·) :=
⟨fun _ ha => ha.ne rfl⟩
theorem CovBy.Ioo_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
h.wcovBy.Ioo_eq
theorem covBy_iff_Ioo_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ Ioo a b = ∅ :=
and_congr_right' <| by simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
theorem CovBy.of_image (f : α ↪o β) (h : f a ⋖ f b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨f.lt_iff_lt.mp h.lt, fun _ hac hcb => h.2 (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hac) (f.lt_iff_lt.mpr hcb)⟩
theorem CovBy.image (f : α ↪o β) (hab : a ⋖ b) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) : f a ⋖ f b :=
(hab.wcovBy.image f h).covBy_of_lt <| f.strictMono hab.lt
theorem Set.OrdConnected.apply_covBy_apply_iff (f : α ↪o β) (h : (range f).OrdConnected) :
f a ⋖ f b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
⟨CovBy.of_image f, fun hab => hab.image f h⟩
@[simp]
theorem apply_covBy_apply_iff {E : Type*} [EquivLike E α β] [OrderIsoClass E α β] (e : E) :
e a ⋖ e b ↔ a ⋖ b :=
(ordConnected_range (e : α ≃o β)).apply_covBy_apply_iff ((e : α ≃o β) : α ↪o β)
theorem covBy_of_eq_or_eq (hab : a < b) (h : ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨hab, fun c ha hb => (h c ha.le hb.le).elim ha.ne' hb.ne⟩
theorem OrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ↪o β) {x y : α} (h : f x ⋖ f y) : x ⋖ y := by
use f.lt_iff_lt.1 h.1
intro a
rw [← f.lt_iff_lt, ← f.lt_iff_lt]
apply h.2
theorem OrderIso.map_covBy {α β : Type*} [Preorder α] [Preorder β]
(f : α ≃o β) {x y : α} : f x ⋖ f y ↔ x ⋖ y := by
use f.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
conv_lhs => rw [← f.symm_apply_apply x, ← f.symm_apply_apply y]
exact f.symm.toOrderEmbedding.covBy_of_apply
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem WCovBy.covBy_of_ne (h : a ⩿ b) (h2 : a ≠ b) : a ⋖ b :=
⟨h.le.lt_of_ne h2, h.2⟩
theorem covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_ne : a ⋖ b ↔ a ⩿ b ∧ a ≠ b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.wcovBy, h.ne⟩, fun h => h.1.covBy_of_ne h.2⟩
theorem wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq : a ⩿ b ↔ a ⋖ b ∨ a = b := by
rw [le_antisymm_iff, wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_le_and_le]
theorem wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy : a ⩿ b ↔ a = b ∨ a ⋖ b :=
wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq.trans or_comm
alias ⟨WCovBy.covBy_or_eq, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_covBy_or_eq
alias ⟨WCovBy.eq_or_covBy, _⟩ := wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy
theorem CovBy.eq_or_eq (h : a ⋖ b) (h2 : a ≤ c) (h3 : c ≤ b) : c = a ∨ c = b :=
h.wcovBy.eq_or_eq h2 h3
/-- An `iff` version of `CovBy.eq_or_eq` and `covBy_of_eq_or_eq`. -/
theorem covBy_iff_lt_and_eq_or_eq : a ⋖ b ↔ a < b ∧ ∀ c, a ≤ c → c ≤ b → c = a ∨ c = b :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.lt, fun _ => h.eq_or_eq⟩, And.rec covBy_of_eq_or_eq⟩
theorem CovBy.Ico_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ico a b = {a} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_left h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Ioc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioc a b = {b} := by
rw [← Ioo_union_right h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Icc_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Icc a b = {a, b} :=
h.wcovBy.Icc_eq
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {a b c : α}
theorem CovBy.Ioi_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Ioi a = Ici b := by
rw [← Ioo_union_Ici_eq_Ioi h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, empty_union]
theorem CovBy.Iio_eq (h : a ⋖ b) : Iio b = Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_union_Ioo_eq_Iio h.lt, h.Ioo_eq, union_empty]
theorem WCovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hcb : c < b) : c ≤ a :=
not_lt.1 fun hac => hab.2 hac hcb
theorem WCovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⩿ b) (hac : a < c) : b ≤ c :=
not_lt.1 <| hab.2 hac
theorem CovBy.le_of_lt (hab : a ⋖ b) : c < b → c ≤ a :=
hab.wcovBy.le_of_lt
theorem CovBy.ge_of_gt (hab : a ⋖ b) : a < c → b ≤ c :=
hab.wcovBy.ge_of_gt
theorem CovBy.unique_left (ha : a ⋖ c) (hb : b ⋖ c) : a = b :=
(hb.le_of_lt ha.lt).antisymm <| ha.le_of_lt hb.lt
theorem CovBy.unique_right (hb : a ⋖ b) (hc : a ⋖ c) : b = c :=
(hb.ge_of_gt hc.lt).antisymm <| hc.ge_of_gt hb.lt
/-- If `a`, `b`, `c` are consecutive and `a < x < c` then `x = b`. -/
theorem CovBy.eq_of_between {x : α} (hab : a ⋖ b) (hbc : b ⋖ c) (hax : a < x) (hxc : x < c) :
x = b :=
le_antisymm (le_of_not_lt fun h => hbc.2 h hxc) (le_of_not_lt <| hab.2 hax)
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z < y ↔ z ≤ x where
mp := fun hx _z ↦ ⟨hx.le_of_lt, fun hz ↦ hz.trans_lt hx.lt⟩
mpr := fun H ↦ ⟨H.2 le_rfl, fun _z hx hz ↦ (H.1 hz).not_lt hx⟩
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, z ≤ x ↔ z < y := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left, iff_comm]
theorem covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, x < z ↔ y ≤ z := by
trans ∀ {z}, ¬ z ≤ x ↔ ¬ z < y
· simp_rw [covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left, not_iff_not]
· simp
theorem covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right {x y : α} : x ⋖ y ↔ ∀ {z}, y ≤ z ↔ x < z := by
simp_rw [covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right, iff_comm]
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_left
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_left, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_left
alias ⟨CovBy.lt_iff_le_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_lt_iff_le_right
alias ⟨CovBy.le_iff_lt_right, _⟩ := covBy_iff_le_iff_lt_right
/-- If `a < b` then there exist `a' > a` and `b' < b` such that `Set.Iio a'` is strictly to the left
of `Set.Ioi b'`. -/
lemma LT.lt.exists_disjoint_Iio_Ioi (h : a < b) :
∃ a' > a, ∃ b' < b, ∀ x < a', ∀ y > b', x < y := by
by_cases h' : a ⋖ b
· exact ⟨b, h, a, h, fun x hx y hy => hx.trans_le <| h'.ge_of_gt hy⟩
· rcases h.exists_lt_lt h' with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, ha, c, hb, fun _ h₁ _ => lt_trans h₁⟩
end LinearOrder
namespace Bool
@[simp] theorem wcovBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⩿ b ↔ a ≤ b := by unfold WCovBy; decide
@[simp] theorem covBy_iff : ∀ {a b : Bool}, a ⋖ b ↔ a < b := by unfold CovBy; decide
instance instDecidableRelWCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⩿ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ wcovBy_iff.symm
instance instDecidableRelCovBy : DecidableRel (· ⋖ · : Bool → Bool → Prop) := fun _ _ ↦
decidable_of_iff _ covBy_iff.symm
end Bool
namespace Set
variable {s t : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp] lemma wcovBy_insert (x : α) (s : Set α) : s ⩿ insert x s := by
refine wcovBy_of_eq_or_eq (subset_insert x s) fun t hst h2t => ?_
by_cases h : x ∈ t
· exact Or.inr (subset_antisymm h2t <| insert_subset_iff.mpr ⟨h, hst⟩)
· refine Or.inl (subset_antisymm ?_ hst)
rwa [← diff_singleton_eq_self h, diff_singleton_subset_iff]
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_wcovBy (s : Set α) (a : α) : s \ {a} ⩿ s := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· convert wcovBy_insert a _
ext
simp [ha]
· simp [ha]
@[simp] lemma covBy_insert (ha : a ∉ s) : s ⋖ insert a s :=
(wcovBy_insert _ _).covBy_of_lt <| ssubset_insert ha
@[simp] lemma sdiff_singleton_covBy (ha : a ∈ s) : s \ {a} ⋖ s :=
⟨sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _, (sdiff_singleton_wcovBy _ _).2⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_insert (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_insert.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssuperset <| h.2 <| ssubset_insert ha).symm⟩
lemma _root_.CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton (h : s ⋖ t) : ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
let ⟨a, ha, hst⟩ := ssubset_iff_sdiff_singleton.1 h.lt
⟨a, ha, (hst.eq_of_not_ssubset fun h' ↦ h.2 h' <|
sdiff_lt (singleton_subset_iff.2 ha) <| singleton_ne_empty _).symm⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_insert : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∉ s, insert a s = t :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_insert, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact covBy_insert ha⟩
lemma covBy_iff_exists_sdiff_singleton : s ⋖ t ↔ ∃ a ∈ t, t \ {a} = s :=
⟨CovBy.exists_set_sdiff_singleton, by rintro ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩; exact sdiff_singleton_covBy ha⟩
end Set
section Relation
open Relation
lemma wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] : ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
ext x y; simp_rw [wcovBy_iff_eq_or_covBy, @eq_comm _ x, reflGen_iff]
lemma transGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
TransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, transGen_reflGen]
lemma reflTransGen_wcovBy_eq_reflTransGen_covBy [PartialOrder α] :
ReflTransGen ((· : α) ⩿ ·) = ReflTransGen (· ⋖ ·) := by
rw [wcovBy_eq_reflGen_covBy, reflTransGen_reflGen]
end Relation
namespace Prod
variable [PartialOrder α] [PartialOrder β] {a a₁ a₂ : α} {b b₁ b₂ : β} {x y : α × β}
@[simp]
theorem swap_wcovBy_swap : x.swap ⩿ y.swap ↔ x ⩿ y :=
apply_wcovBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
@[simp]
theorem swap_covBy_swap : x.swap ⋖ y.swap ↔ x ⋖ y :=
apply_covBy_apply_iff (OrderIso.prodComm : α × β ≃o β × α)
theorem fst_eq_or_snd_eq_of_wcovBy : x ⩿ y → x.1 = y.1 ∨ x.2 = y.2 := by
refine fun h => of_not_not fun hab => ?_
push_neg at hab
exact
h.2 (mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inl ⟨hab.1.lt_of_le h.1.1, le_rfl⟩)
(mk_lt_mk.2 <| Or.inr ⟨le_rfl, hab.2.lt_of_le h.1.2⟩)
theorem _root_.WCovBy.fst (h : x ⩿ y) : x.1 ⩿ y.1 :=
⟨h.1.1, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_left.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h₂.le, h.1.2⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.1⟩⟩
theorem _root_.WCovBy.snd (h : x ⩿ y) : x.2 ⩿ y.2 :=
⟨h.1.2, fun _ h₁ h₂ => h.2 (mk_lt_mk_iff_right.2 h₁) ⟨⟨h.1.1, h₂.le⟩, fun hc => h₂.not_le hc.2⟩⟩
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⩿ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⩿ a₂ := by
refine ⟨WCovBy.fst, (And.imp mk_le_mk_iff_left.2) fun h c h₁ h₂ => ?_⟩
have : c.2 = b := h₂.le.2.antisymm h₁.le.2
rw [← @Prod.mk.eta _ _ c, this, mk_lt_mk_iff_left] at h₁ h₂
exact h h₁ h₂
theorem mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_right : (a, b₁) ⩿ (a, b₂) ↔ b₁ ⩿ b₂ :=
swap_wcovBy_swap.trans mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left
| Mathlib/Order/Cover.lean | 533 | 535 | theorem mk_covBy_mk_iff_left : (a₁, b) ⋖ (a₂, b) ↔ a₁ ⋖ a₂ := by | simp_rw [covBy_iff_wcovBy_and_lt, mk_wcovBy_mk_iff_left, mk_lt_mk_iff_left] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 María Inés de Frutos-Fernández. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: María Inés de Frutos-Fernández
-/
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Defs
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Valuation.Basic
/-!
# Rank one valuations
We define rank one valuations.
## Main Definitions
* `RankOne` : A valuation `v` has rank one if it is nontrivial and its image is contained in `ℝ≥0`.
Note that this class contains the data of the inclusion of the codomain of `v` into `ℝ≥0`.
## Tags
valuation, rank one
-/
noncomputable section
open Function Multiplicative
open scoped NNReal
variable {R : Type*} [Ring R] {Γ₀ : Type*} [LinearOrderedCommGroupWithZero Γ₀]
namespace Valuation
/-- A valuation has rank one if it is nontrivial and its image is contained in `ℝ≥0`.
Note that this class includes the data of an inclusion morphism `Γ₀ → ℝ≥0`. -/
class RankOne (v : Valuation R Γ₀) where
/-- The inclusion morphism from `Γ₀` to `ℝ≥0`. -/
hom : Γ₀ →*₀ ℝ≥0
strictMono' : StrictMono hom
nontrivial' : ∃ r : R, v r ≠ 0 ∧ v r ≠ 1
namespace RankOne
variable (v : Valuation R Γ₀) [RankOne v]
lemma strictMono : StrictMono (hom v) := strictMono'
lemma nontrivial : ∃ r : R, v r ≠ 0 ∧ v r ≠ 1 := nontrivial'
/-- If `v` is a rank one valuation and `x : Γ₀` has image `0` under `RankOne.hom v`, then
`x = 0`. -/
theorem zero_of_hom_zero {x : Γ₀} (hx : hom v x = 0) : x = 0 := by
refine (eq_of_le_of_not_lt (zero_le' (a := x)) fun h_lt ↦ ?_).symm
have hs := strictMono v h_lt
rw [map_zero, hx] at hs
exact hs.false
/-- If `v` is a rank one valuation, then`x : Γ₀` has image `0` under `RankOne.hom v` if and
only if `x = 0`. -/
theorem hom_eq_zero_iff {x : Γ₀} : RankOne.hom v x = 0 ↔ x = 0 :=
⟨fun h ↦ zero_of_hom_zero v h, fun h ↦ by rw [h, map_zero]⟩
/-- A nontrivial unit of `Γ₀`, given that there exists a rank one `v : Valuation R Γ₀`. -/
def unit : Γ₀ˣ :=
Units.mk0 (v (nontrivial v).choose) ((nontrivial v).choose_spec).1
/-- A proof that `RankOne.unit v ≠ 1`. -/
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Valuation/RankOne.lean | 67 | 69 | theorem unit_ne_one : unit v ≠ 1 := by | rw [Ne, ← Units.eq_iff, Units.val_one]
exact ((nontrivial v).choose_spec ).2 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Oliver Nash, Antoine Labelle
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Dual.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Matrix.ToLin
/-!
# Contractions
Given modules $M, N$ over a commutative ring $R$, this file defines the natural linear maps:
$M^* \otimes M \to R$, $M \otimes M^* \to R$, and $M^* \otimes N → Hom(M, N)$, as well as proving
some basic properties of these maps.
## Tags
contraction, dual module, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
variable {ι : Type*} (R M N P Q : Type*)
-- Porting note: we need high priority for this to fire first; not the case in ML3
attribute [local ext high] TensorProduct.ext
section Contraction
open TensorProduct LinearMap Matrix Module
open TensorProduct
section CommSemiring
variable [CommSemiring R]
variable [AddCommMonoid M] [AddCommMonoid N] [AddCommMonoid P] [AddCommMonoid Q]
variable [Module R M] [Module R N] [Module R P] [Module R Q]
variable [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (b : Basis ι R M)
/-- The natural left-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractLeft : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun LinearMap.id
/-- The natural right-handed pairing between a module and its dual. -/
def contractRight : M ⊗[R] Module.Dual R M →ₗ[R] R :=
(uncurry _ _ _ _).toFun (LinearMap.flip LinearMap.id)
/-- The natural map associating a linear map to the tensor product of two modules. -/
def dualTensorHom : Module.Dual R M ⊗[R] N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N :=
let M' := Module.Dual R M
(uncurry R M' N (M →ₗ[R] N) : _ → M' ⊗ N →ₗ[R] M →ₗ[R] N) LinearMap.smulRightₗ
variable {R M N P Q}
@[simp]
theorem contractLeft_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractLeft R M (f ⊗ₜ m) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contractRight_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) : contractRight R M (m ⊗ₜ f) = f m :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_apply (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) (n : N) :
dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ n) m = f m • n :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem transpose_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (m : M) :
Dual.transpose (R := R) (dualTensorHom R M M (f ⊗ₜ m)) =
dualTensorHom R _ _ (Dual.eval R M m ⊗ₜ f) := by
ext f' m'
simp only [Dual.transpose_apply, coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
LinearMap.map_smulₛₗ, RingHom.id_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul, Dual.eval_apply,
LinearMap.smul_apply]
exact mul_comm _ _
@[simp]
theorem dualTensorHom_prodMap_zero (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) :
((dualTensorHom R M P) (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)).prodMap (0 : N →ₗ[R] Q) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((f ∘ₗ fst R M N) ⊗ₜ inl R P Q p) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inl, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
fst_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem zero_prodMap_dualTensorHom (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
(0 : M →ₗ[R] P).prodMap ((dualTensorHom R N Q) (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M × N) (P × Q) ((g ∘ₗ snd R M N) ⊗ₜ inr R P Q q) := by
ext <;>
simp only [coe_comp, coe_inr, Function.comp_apply, prodMap_apply, dualTensorHom_apply,
snd_apply, Prod.smul_mk, LinearMap.zero_apply, smul_zero]
theorem map_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (p : P) (g : Module.Dual R N) (q : Q) :
TensorProduct.map (dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ[R] p)) (dualTensorHom R N Q (g ⊗ₜ[R] q)) =
dualTensorHom R (M ⊗[R] N) (P ⊗[R] Q) (dualDistrib R M N (f ⊗ₜ g) ⊗ₜ[R] p ⊗ₜ[R] q) := by
ext m n
simp only [compr₂_apply, mk_apply, map_tmul, dualTensorHom_apply, dualDistrib_apply, ←
smul_tmul_smul]
@[simp]
theorem comp_dualTensorHom (f : Module.Dual R M) (n : N) (g : Module.Dual R N) (p : P) :
dualTensorHom R N P (g ⊗ₜ[R] p) ∘ₗ dualTensorHom R M N (f ⊗ₜ[R] n) =
g n • dualTensorHom R M P (f ⊗ₜ p) := by
ext m
simp only [coe_comp, Function.comp_apply, dualTensorHom_apply, LinearMap.map_smul,
RingHom.id_apply, LinearMap.smul_apply]
rw [smul_comm]
/-- As a matrix, `dualTensorHom` evaluated on a basis element of `M* ⊗ N` is a matrix with a
single one and zeros elsewhere -/
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Contraction.lean | 113 | 118 | theorem toMatrix_dualTensorHom {m : Type*} {n : Type*} [Fintype m] [Finite n] [DecidableEq m]
[DecidableEq n] (bM : Basis m R M) (bN : Basis n R N) (j : m) (i : n) :
toMatrix bM bN (dualTensorHom R M N (bM.coord j ⊗ₜ bN i)) = stdBasisMatrix i j 1 := by | ext i' j'
by_cases hij : i = i' ∧ j = j' <;>
simp [LinearMap.toMatrix_apply, Finsupp.single_eq_pi_single, hij] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Eric Wieser. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.CliffordAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.RingTheory.GradedAlgebra.Basic
/-!
# Results about the grading structure of the clifford algebra
The main result is `CliffordAlgebra.gradedAlgebra`, which says that the clifford algebra is a
ℤ₂-graded algebra (or "superalgebra").
-/
namespace CliffordAlgebra
variable {R M : Type*} [CommRing R] [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M]
variable {Q : QuadraticForm R M}
open scoped DirectSum
variable (Q)
/-- The even or odd submodule, defined as the supremum of the even or odd powers of
`(ι Q).range`. `evenOdd 0` is the even submodule, and `evenOdd 1` is the odd submodule. -/
def evenOdd (i : ZMod 2) : Submodule R (CliffordAlgebra Q) :=
⨆ j : { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (j : ℕ)
theorem one_le_evenOdd_zero : 1 ≤ evenOdd Q 0 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨0, Nat.cast_zero⟩)
exact (pow_zero _).ge
theorem range_ι_le_evenOdd_one : LinearMap.range (ι Q) ≤ evenOdd Q 1 := by
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ ⟨1, Nat.cast_one⟩)
exact (pow_one _).ge
theorem ι_mem_evenOdd_one (m : M) : ι Q m ∈ evenOdd Q 1 :=
range_ι_le_evenOdd_one Q <| LinearMap.mem_range_self _ m
theorem ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero (m₁ m₂ : M) : ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ ∈ evenOdd Q 0 :=
Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem ⟨2, rfl⟩
(by
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, pow_two]
exact
Submodule.mul_mem_mul (LinearMap.mem_range_self (ι Q) m₁)
(LinearMap.mem_range_self (ι Q) m₂))
theorem evenOdd_mul_le (i j : ZMod 2) : evenOdd Q i * evenOdd Q j ≤ evenOdd Q (i + j) := by
simp_rw [evenOdd, Submodule.iSup_eq_span, Submodule.span_mul_span]
apply Submodule.span_mono
simp_rw [Set.iUnion_mul, Set.mul_iUnion, Set.iUnion_subset_iff, Set.mul_subset_iff]
rintro ⟨xi, rfl⟩ ⟨yi, rfl⟩ x hx y hy
refine Set.mem_iUnion.mpr ⟨⟨xi + yi, Nat.cast_add _ _⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [Subtype.coe_mk, Nat.cast_add, pow_add]
exact Submodule.mul_mem_mul hx hy
instance evenOdd.gradedMonoid : SetLike.GradedMonoid (evenOdd Q) where
one_mem := Submodule.one_le.mp (one_le_evenOdd_zero Q)
mul_mem _i _j _p _q hp hq := Submodule.mul_le.mp (evenOdd_mul_le Q _ _) _ hp _ hq
/-- A version of `CliffordAlgebra.ι` that maps directly into the graded structure. This is
primarily an auxiliary construction used to provide `CliffordAlgebra.gradedAlgebra`. -/
protected def GradedAlgebra.ι : M →ₗ[R] ⨁ i : ZMod 2, evenOdd Q i :=
DirectSum.lof R (ZMod 2) (fun i => ↥(evenOdd Q i)) 1 ∘ₗ (ι Q).codRestrict _ (ι_mem_evenOdd_one Q)
theorem GradedAlgebra.ι_apply (m : M) :
GradedAlgebra.ι Q m = DirectSum.of (fun i => ↥(evenOdd Q i)) 1 ⟨ι Q m, ι_mem_evenOdd_one Q m⟩ :=
rfl
nonrec theorem GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar (m : M) :
GradedAlgebra.ι Q m * GradedAlgebra.ι Q m = algebraMap R _ (Q m) := by
rw [GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.of_mul_of, DirectSum.algebraMap_apply]
exact DirectSum.of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (Sigma.subtype_ext rfl <| ι_sq_scalar _ _)
theorem GradedAlgebra.lift_ι_eq (i' : ZMod 2) (x' : evenOdd Q i') :
lift Q ⟨GradedAlgebra.ι Q, GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar Q⟩ x' =
DirectSum.of (fun i => evenOdd Q i) i' x' := by
obtain ⟨x', hx'⟩ := x'
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk, DirectSum.lof_eq_of]
induction hx' using Submodule.iSup_induction' with
| mem i x hx =>
obtain ⟨i, rfl⟩ := i
dsimp only [Subtype.coe_mk] at hx
induction hx using Submodule.pow_induction_on_left' with
| algebraMap r =>
rw [AlgHom.commutes, DirectSum.algebraMap_apply]; rfl
| add x y i hx hy ihx ihy =>
rw [map_add, ihx, ihy, ← AddMonoidHom.map_add]
rfl
| mem_mul m hm i x hx ih =>
obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := hm
rw [map_mul, ih, lift_ι_apply, GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.of_mul_of]
refine DirectSum.of_eq_of_gradedMonoid_eq (Sigma.subtype_ext ?_ ?_) <;>
dsimp only [GradedMonoid.mk, Subtype.coe_mk]
· rw [Nat.succ_eq_add_one, add_comm, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
rfl
| zero =>
rw [map_zero]
apply Eq.symm
apply DFinsupp.single_eq_zero.mpr; rfl
| add x y hx hy ihx ihy =>
rw [map_add, ihx, ihy, ← AddMonoidHom.map_add]; rfl
/-- The clifford algebra is graded by the even and odd parts. -/
instance gradedAlgebra : GradedAlgebra (evenOdd Q) :=
GradedAlgebra.ofAlgHom (evenOdd Q)
-- while not necessary, the `by apply` makes this elaborate faster
(lift Q ⟨by apply GradedAlgebra.ι Q, by apply GradedAlgebra.ι_sq_scalar Q⟩)
-- the proof from here onward is mostly similar to the `TensorAlgebra` case, with some extra
-- handling for the `iSup` in `evenOdd`.
(by
ext m
dsimp only [LinearMap.comp_apply, AlgHom.toLinearMap_apply, AlgHom.comp_apply,
AlgHom.id_apply]
rw [lift_ι_apply, GradedAlgebra.ι_apply Q, DirectSum.coeAlgHom_of, Subtype.coe_mk])
(by apply GradedAlgebra.lift_ι_eq Q)
theorem iSup_ι_range_eq_top : ⨆ i : ℕ, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ i = ⊤ := by
rw [← (DirectSum.Decomposition.isInternal (evenOdd Q)).submodule_iSup_eq_top, eq_comm]
calc
-- Porting note: needs extra annotations, no longer unifies against the goal in the face of
-- ambiguity
⨆ (i : ZMod 2) (j : { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }), LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (j : ℕ) =
⨆ i : Σ i : ZMod 2, { n : ℕ // ↑n = i }, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ (i.2 : ℕ) := by
rw [iSup_sigma]
_ = ⨆ i : ℕ, LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ i :=
Function.Surjective.iSup_congr (fun i => i.2) (fun i => ⟨⟨_, i, rfl⟩, rfl⟩) fun _ => rfl
theorem evenOdd_isCompl : IsCompl (evenOdd Q 0) (evenOdd Q 1) :=
(DirectSum.Decomposition.isInternal (evenOdd Q)).isCompl zero_ne_one <| by
have : (Finset.univ : Finset (ZMod 2)) = {0, 1} := rfl
simpa using congr_arg ((↑) : Finset (ZMod 2) → Set (ZMod 2)) this
/-- To show a property is true on the even or odd part, it suffices to show it is true on the
scalars or vectors (respectively), closed under addition, and under left-multiplication by a pair
of vectors. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/CliffordAlgebra/Grading.lean | 140 | 149 | theorem evenOdd_induction (n : ZMod 2) {motive : ∀ x, x ∈ evenOdd Q n → Prop}
(range_ι_pow : ∀ (v) (h : v ∈ LinearMap.range (ι Q) ^ n.val),
motive v (Submodule.mem_iSup_of_mem ⟨n.val, n.natCast_zmod_val⟩ h))
(add : ∀ x y hx hy, motive x hx → motive y hy → motive (x + y) (Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy))
(ι_mul_ι_mul :
∀ m₁ m₂ x hx,
motive x hx →
motive (ι Q m₁ * ι Q m₂ * x)
(zero_add n ▸ SetLike.mul_mem_graded (ι_mul_ι_mem_evenOdd_zero Q m₁ m₂) hx))
(x : CliffordAlgebra Q) (hx : x ∈ evenOdd Q n) : motive x hx := by | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Guy Leroy. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sangwoo Jo (aka Jason), Guy Leroy, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Semiconj
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Commute.Units
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.GCD.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Operations
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Int.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Basic
/-!
# Extended GCD and divisibility over ℤ
## Main definitions
* Given `x y : ℕ`, `xgcd x y` computes the pair of integers `(a, b)` such that
`gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. `gcdA x y` and `gcdB x y` are defined to be `a` and `b`,
respectively.
## Main statements
* `gcd_eq_gcd_ab`: Bézout's lemma, given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y`.
## Tags
Bézout's lemma, Bezout's lemma
-/
/-! ### Extended Euclidean algorithm -/
namespace Nat
/-- Helper function for the extended GCD algorithm (`Nat.xgcd`). -/
def xgcdAux : ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ → ℤ → ℤ → ℕ × ℤ × ℤ
| 0, _, _, r', s', t' => (r', s', t')
| succ k, s, t, r', s', t' =>
let q := r' / succ k
xgcdAux (r' % succ k) (s' - q * s) (t' - q * t) (succ k) s t
termination_by k => k
decreasing_by exact mod_lt _ <| (succ_pos _).gt
@[simp]
theorem xgcd_zero_left {s t r' s' t'} : xgcdAux 0 s t r' s' t' = (r', s', t') := by simp [xgcdAux]
theorem xgcdAux_rec {r s t r' s' t'} (h : 0 < r) :
xgcdAux r s t r' s' t' = xgcdAux (r' % r) (s' - r' / r * s) (t' - r' / r * t) r s t := by
obtain ⟨r, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h.ne'
simp [xgcdAux]
/-- Use the extended GCD algorithm to generate the `a` and `b` values
satisfying `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def xgcd (x y : ℕ) : ℤ × ℤ :=
(xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1).2
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).1
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB (x y : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(xgcd x y).2
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdA 0 s = 0 := by
unfold gcdA
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_left {s : ℕ} : gcdB 0 s = 1 := by
unfold gcdB
rw [xgcd, xgcd_zero_left]
@[simp]
theorem gcdA_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdA s 0 = 1 := by
unfold gcdA xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem gcdB_zero_right {s : ℕ} (h : s ≠ 0) : gcdB s 0 = 0 := by
unfold gcdB xgcd
obtain ⟨s, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
rw [xgcdAux]
simp
@[simp]
theorem xgcdAux_fst (x y) : ∀ s t s' t', (xgcdAux x s t y s' t').1 = gcd x y :=
gcd.induction x y (by simp) fun x y h IH s t s' t' => by
simp only [h, xgcdAux_rec, IH]
rw [← gcd_rec]
theorem xgcdAux_val (x y) : xgcdAux x 1 0 y 0 1 = (gcd x y, xgcd x y) := by
rw [xgcd, ← xgcdAux_fst x y 1 0 0 1]
theorem xgcd_val (x y) : xgcd x y = (gcdA x y, gcdB x y) := by
unfold gcdA gcdB; cases xgcd x y; rfl
section
variable (x y : ℕ)
private def P : ℕ × ℤ × ℤ → Prop
| (r, s, t) => (r : ℤ) = x * s + y * t
theorem xgcdAux_P {r r'} :
∀ {s t s' t'}, P x y (r, s, t) → P x y (r', s', t') → P x y (xgcdAux r s t r' s' t') := by
induction r, r' using gcd.induction with
| H0 => simp
| H1 a b h IH =>
intro s t s' t' p p'
rw [xgcdAux_rec h]; refine IH ?_ p; dsimp [P] at *
rw [Int.emod_def]; generalize (b / a : ℤ) = k
rw [p, p', Int.mul_sub, sub_add_eq_add_sub, Int.mul_sub, Int.add_mul, mul_comm k t,
mul_comm k s, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, add_comm (x * s * k), ← add_sub_assoc, sub_sub]
/-- **Bézout's lemma**: given `x y : ℕ`, `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`, where `a = gcd_a x y` and
`b = gcd_b x y` are computed by the extended Euclidean algorithm.
-/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y := by
have := @xgcdAux_P x y x y 1 0 0 1 (by simp [P]) (by simp [P])
rwa [xgcdAux_val, xgcd_val] at this
end
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd {k n : ℕ} (hk : gcd n k < k) : ∃ m, n * m % k = gcd n k := by
have hk' := Int.ofNat_ne_zero.2 (ne_of_gt (lt_of_le_of_lt (zero_le (gcd n k)) hk))
have key := congr_arg (fun (m : ℤ) => (m % k).toNat) (gcd_eq_gcd_ab n k)
simp only at key
rw [Int.add_mul_emod_self_left, ← Int.natCast_mod, Int.toNat_natCast, mod_eq_of_lt hk] at key
refine ⟨(n.gcdA k % k).toNat, Eq.trans (Int.ofNat.inj ?_) key.symm⟩
rw [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.natCast_mod, Int.natCast_mul,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.ofNat_eq_coe,
Int.toNat_of_nonneg (Int.emod_nonneg _ hk'), Int.mul_emod, Int.emod_emod, ← Int.mul_emod]
theorem exists_mul_emod_eq_one_of_coprime {k n : ℕ} (hkn : Coprime n k) (hk : 1 < k) :
∃ m, n * m % k = 1 :=
Exists.recOn (exists_mul_emod_eq_gcd (lt_of_le_of_lt (le_of_eq hkn) hk)) fun m hm ↦
⟨m, hm.trans hkn⟩
end Nat
/-! ### Divisibility over ℤ -/
namespace Int
theorem gcd_def (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = Nat.gcd i.natAbs j.natAbs := rfl
@[simp, norm_cast] protected lemma gcd_natCast_natCast (m n : ℕ) : gcd ↑m ↑n = m.gcd n := rfl
/-- The extended GCD `a` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdA : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| ofNat m, n => m.gcdA n.natAbs
| -[m+1], n => -m.succ.gcdA n.natAbs
/-- The extended GCD `b` value in the equation `gcd x y = x * a + y * b`. -/
def gcdB : ℤ → ℤ → ℤ
| m, ofNat n => m.natAbs.gcdB n
| m, -[n+1] => -m.natAbs.gcdB n.succ
/-- **Bézout's lemma** -/
theorem gcd_eq_gcd_ab : ∀ x y : ℤ, (gcd x y : ℤ) = x * gcdA x y + y * gcdB x y
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab _ _
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = _ + -(n + 1) * -_ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], (n : ℕ) =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + _ by rw [Int.neg_mul_neg]; apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
| -[m+1], -[n+1] =>
show (_ : ℤ) = -(m + 1) * -_ + -(n + 1) * -_ by
rw [Int.neg_mul_neg, Int.neg_mul_neg]
apply Nat.gcd_eq_gcd_ab
theorem lcm_def (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = Nat.lcm (natAbs i) (natAbs j) :=
rfl
protected theorem coe_nat_lcm (m n : ℕ) : Int.lcm ↑m ↑n = Nat.lcm m n :=
rfl
theorem dvd_coe_gcd {i j k : ℤ} (h1 : k ∣ i) (h2 : k ∣ j) : k ∣ gcd i j :=
natAbs_dvd.1 <|
natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <| Nat.dvd_gcd (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.2 h2)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")] alias dvd_gcd := dvd_coe_gcd
theorem gcd_mul_lcm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j * lcm i j = natAbs (i * j) := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.lcm, Nat.gcd_mul_lcm, natAbs_mul]
theorem gcd_comm (i j : ℤ) : gcd i j = gcd j i :=
Nat.gcd_comm _ _
theorem gcd_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (gcd i j) k = gcd i (gcd j k) :=
Nat.gcd_assoc _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem gcd_self (i : ℤ) : gcd i i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_left (i : ℤ) : gcd 0 i = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
@[simp]
theorem gcd_zero_right (i : ℤ) : gcd i 0 = natAbs i := by simp [gcd]
theorem gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (i * k) = natAbs i * gcd j k := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_left
theorem gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd (i * j) (k * j) = gcd i k * natAbs j := by
rw [Int.gcd, Int.gcd, natAbs_mul, natAbs_mul]
apply Nat.gcd_mul_right
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left {i : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (hi : i ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_left _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hi
theorem gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_right (i : ℤ) {j : ℤ} (hj : j ≠ 0) : 0 < gcd i j :=
Nat.gcd_pos_of_pos_right _ <| natAbs_pos.2 hj
theorem gcd_eq_zero_iff {i j : ℤ} : gcd i j = 0 ↔ i = 0 ∧ j = 0 := by
rw [gcd, Nat.gcd_eq_zero_iff, natAbs_eq_zero, natAbs_eq_zero]
theorem gcd_pos_iff {i j : ℤ} : 0 < gcd i j ↔ i ≠ 0 ∨ j ≠ 0 :=
Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero.trans <| gcd_eq_zero_iff.not.trans not_and_or
theorem gcd_div {i j k : ℤ} (H1 : k ∣ i) (H2 : k ∣ j) :
gcd (i / k) (j / k) = gcd i j / natAbs k := by
rw [gcd, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd i k H1, natAbs_ediv_of_dvd j k H2]
exact Nat.gcd_div (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H1) (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H2)
theorem gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd {i j : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd i j) : gcd (i / gcd i j) (j / gcd i j) = 1 := by
rw [gcd_div gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right, natAbs_ofNat, Nat.div_self H]
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd i j ∣ gcd k j :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd (gcd_dvd_left.trans H) gcd_dvd_right
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right {i k : ℤ} (j : ℤ) (H : i ∣ k) : gcd j i ∣ gcd j k :=
Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.1 <| dvd_coe_gcd gcd_dvd_left (gcd_dvd_right.trans H)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (k * i) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd (i * k) j :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_left _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (k * j) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_left _ _)
theorem gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right (i j k : ℤ) : gcd i j ∣ gcd i (j * k) :=
gcd_dvd_gcd_of_dvd_right _ (dvd_mul_right _ _)
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a m = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_left {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd m = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_right_right a m n
/-- If `gcd a (m * n) = 1`, then `gcd a n = 1`. -/
theorem gcd_eq_one_of_gcd_mul_right_eq_one_right {a : ℤ} {m n : ℕ} (h : a.gcd (m * n) = 1) :
a.gcd n = 1 :=
Nat.dvd_one.mp <| h ▸ gcd_dvd_gcd_mul_left_right a n m
theorem gcd_eq_left {i j : ℤ} (H : i ∣ j) : gcd i j = natAbs i :=
Nat.dvd_antisymm (Nat.gcd_dvd_left _ _) (Nat.dvd_gcd dvd_rfl (natAbs_dvd_natAbs.mpr H))
theorem gcd_eq_right {i j : ℤ} (H : j ∣ i) : gcd i j = natAbs j := by rw [gcd_comm, gcd_eq_left H]
theorem ne_zero_of_gcd {x y : ℤ} (hc : gcd x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! hc
rw [hc.left, hc.right, gcd_zero_right, natAbs_zero]
theorem exists_gcd_one {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ m' n' : ℤ, gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * gcd m n ∧ n = n' * gcd m n :=
⟨_, _, gcd_div_gcd_div_gcd H, (Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_left).symm,
(Int.ediv_mul_cancel gcd_dvd_right).symm⟩
theorem exists_gcd_one' {m n : ℤ} (H : 0 < gcd m n) :
∃ (g : ℕ) (m' n' : ℤ), 0 < g ∧ gcd m' n' = 1 ∧ m = m' * g ∧ n = n' * g :=
let ⟨m', n', h⟩ := exists_gcd_one H
⟨_, m', n', H, h⟩
theorem pow_dvd_pow_iff {m n : ℤ} {k : ℕ} (k0 : k ≠ 0) : m ^ k ∣ n ^ k ↔ m ∣ n := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => pow_dvd_pow_of_dvd h _⟩
rwa [← natAbs_dvd_natAbs, ← Nat.pow_dvd_pow_iff k0, ← Int.natAbs_pow, ← Int.natAbs_pow,
natAbs_dvd_natAbs]
theorem gcd_dvd_iff {a b : ℤ} {n : ℕ} : gcd a b ∣ n ↔ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [← Nat.mul_div_cancel' h, Int.ofNat_mul, gcd_eq_gcd_ab, Int.add_mul, mul_assoc, mul_assoc]
exact ⟨_, _, rfl⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, h⟩
rw [← Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, h]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_left _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right y)
theorem gcd_greatest {a b d : ℤ} (hd_pos : 0 ≤ d) (hda : d ∣ a) (hdb : d ∣ b)
(hd : ∀ e : ℤ, e ∣ a → e ∣ b → e ∣ d) : d = gcd a b :=
dvd_antisymm hd_pos (ofNat_zero_le (gcd a b)) (dvd_coe_gcd hda hdb)
(hd _ gcd_dvd_left gcd_dvd_right)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a c = 1` then `a ∣ b`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a c = 1) :
a ∣ b := by
have := gcd_eq_gcd_ab a c
simp only [hab, Int.ofNat_zero, Int.ofNat_succ, zero_add] at this
have : b * a * gcdA a c + b * c * gcdB a c = b := by simp [mul_assoc, ← Int.mul_add, ← this]
rw [← this]
exact Int.dvd_add (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left (dvd_mul_left a b) _) (dvd_mul_of_dvd_left habc _)
/-- Euclid's lemma: if `a ∣ b * c` and `gcd a b = 1` then `a ∣ c`.
Compare with `IsCoprime.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right` and
`UniqueFactorizationMonoid.dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_no_prime_factors` -/
theorem dvd_of_dvd_mul_right_of_gcd_one {a b c : ℤ} (habc : a ∣ b * c) (hab : gcd a b = 1) :
a ∣ c := by
rw [mul_comm] at habc
exact dvd_of_dvd_mul_left_of_gcd_one habc hab
/-- For nonzero integers `a` and `b`, `gcd a b` is the smallest positive natural number that can be
written in the form `a * x + b * y` for some pair of integers `x` and `y` -/
theorem gcd_least_linear {a b : ℤ} (ha : a ≠ 0) :
IsLeast { n : ℕ | 0 < n ∧ ∃ x y : ℤ, ↑n = a * x + b * y } (a.gcd b) := by
simp_rw [← gcd_dvd_iff]
constructor
· simpa [and_true, dvd_refl, Set.mem_setOf_eq] using gcd_pos_of_ne_zero_left b ha
· simp only [lowerBounds, and_imp, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact fun n hn_pos hn => Nat.le_of_dvd hn_pos hn
/-! ### lcm -/
theorem lcm_comm (i j : ℤ) : lcm i j = lcm j i := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm]
exact Nat.lcm_comm _ _
theorem lcm_assoc (i j k : ℤ) : lcm (lcm i j) k = lcm i (lcm j k) := by
rw [Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, Int.lcm, natAbs_ofNat, natAbs_ofNat]
apply Nat.lcm_assoc
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/GCD.lean | 344 | 347 | theorem lcm_zero_left (i : ℤ) : lcm 0 i = 0 := by | rw [Int.lcm]
apply Nat.lcm_zero_left |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Gabriel Ebner
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Int.Cast.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
/-!
# Cast of integers (additional theorems)
This file proves additional properties about the *canonical* homomorphism from
the integers into an additive group with a one (`Int.cast`).
There is also `Data.Int.Cast.Lemmas`,
which includes lemmas stated in terms of algebraic homomorphisms,
and results involving the order structure of `ℤ`.
By contrast, this file's only import beyond `Data.Int.Cast.Defs` is `Algebra.Group.Basic`.
-/
universe u
namespace Nat
variable {R : Type u} [AddGroupWithOne R]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_sub {m n} (h : m ≤ n) : ((n - m : ℕ) : R) = n - m :=
eq_sub_of_add_eq <| by rw [← cast_add, Nat.sub_add_cancel h]
-- `HasLiftT` appeared in the type signature
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_pred : ∀ {n}, 0 < n → ((n - 1 : ℕ) : R) = n - 1
| 0, h => by cases h
| n + 1, _ => by rw [cast_succ, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
end Nat
open Nat
namespace Int
variable {R : Type u} [AddGroupWithOne R]
-- TODO: I don't like that `norm_cast` is used here, because it results in `norm_cast`
-- introducing the "implementation detail" `Int.negSucc`.
@[simp, norm_cast squash]
theorem cast_negSucc (n : ℕ) : (-[n+1] : R) = -(n + 1 : ℕ) :=
AddGroupWithOne.intCast_negSucc n
-- expected `n` to be implicit, and `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_zero : ((0 : ℤ) : R) = 0 :=
(AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat 0).trans Nat.cast_zero
-- type had `HasLiftT`
-- This lemma competes with `Int.ofNat_eq_natCast` to come later
@[simp high, nolint simpNF, norm_cast]
theorem cast_natCast (n : ℕ) : ((n : ℤ) : R) = n :=
AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat _
-- expected `n` to be implicit, and `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_ofNat (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
((ofNat(n) : ℤ) : R) = ofNat(n) := by
simpa only [OfNat.ofNat] using AddGroupWithOne.intCast_ofNat (R := R) n
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_one : ((1 : ℤ) : R) = 1 := by
rw [← Int.natCast_one, cast_natCast, Nat.cast_one]
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_neg : ∀ n, ((-n : ℤ) : R) = -n
| (0 : ℕ) => by simp
| (n + 1 : ℕ) => by rw [cast_natCast, neg_ofNat_succ]; simp
| -[n+1] => by rw [Int.neg_negSucc, cast_natCast]; simp
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_subNatNat (m n) : ((Int.subNatNat m n : ℤ) : R) = m - n := by
unfold subNatNat
cases e : n - m
· simp only [ofNat_eq_coe]
simp [e, Nat.le_of_sub_eq_zero e]
· rw [cast_negSucc, ← e, Nat.cast_sub <| _root_.le_of_lt <| Nat.lt_of_sub_eq_succ e, neg_sub]
-- type had `HasLiftT`
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Data/Int/Cast/Basic.lean | 93 | 98 | theorem cast_negOfNat (n : ℕ) : ((negOfNat n : ℤ) : R) = -n := by | simp [Int.cast_neg, negOfNat_eq]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem cast_add : ∀ m n, ((m + n : ℤ) : R) = m + n
| (m : ℕ), (n : ℕ) => by simp [← Int.natCast_add]
| (m : ℕ), -[n+1] => by erw [cast_subNatNat, cast_natCast, cast_negSucc, sub_eq_add_neg] |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.LinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace.ContinuousFunctions
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Inner
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-! # `L^2` space
If `E` is an inner product space over `𝕜` (`ℝ` or `ℂ`), then `Lp E 2 μ`
(defined in `Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LpSpace`)
is also an inner product space, with inner product defined as `inner f g = ∫ a, ⟪f a, g a⟫ ∂μ`.
### Main results
* `mem_L1_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product `fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫`
belongs to `Lp 𝕜 1 μ`.
* `integrable_inner` : for `f` and `g` in `Lp E 2 μ`, the pointwise inner product
`fun x ↦ ⟪f x, g x⟫` is integrable.
* `L2.innerProductSpace` : `Lp E 2 μ` is an inner product space.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Lp Filter
open scoped NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {α F : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup F]
theorem MemLp.integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (h : MemLp f 2 μ) : Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by
simpa [← memLp_one_iff_integrable] using h.norm_rpow two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias Memℒp.integrable_sq := MemLp.integrable_sq
theorem memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm {f : α → F} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
MemLp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => ‖f x‖ ^ 2) μ := by
rw [← memLp_one_iff_integrable]
convert (memLp_norm_rpow_iff hf two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top).symm
· simp
· rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel two_ne_zero ENNReal.ofNat_ne_top]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-21")]
alias memℒp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm := memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/L2Space.lean | 54 | 57 | theorem memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq {f : α → ℝ} (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) :
MemLp f 2 μ ↔ Integrable (fun x => f x ^ 2) μ := by | convert memLp_two_iff_integrable_sq_norm hf using 3
simp |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.