Context stringlengths 227 76.5k | target stringlengths 0 11.6k | file_name stringlengths 21 79 | start int64 14 3.67k | end int64 16 3.69k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Reverse
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.SMul
/-!
# Theory of monic polynomials
We give several tools for proving that polynomials are monic, e.g.
`Monic.mul`, `Monic.map`, `Monic.pow`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Finset
open Polynomial
namespace Polynomial
universe u v y
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {a b : R} {m n : ℕ} {ι : Type y}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R] {p q r : R[X]}
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton : Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ Subsingleton R :=
subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one
theorem not_monic_zero_iff : ¬Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
(monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans subsingleton_iff_zero_eq_one.symm).not
theorem monic_zero_iff_subsingleton' :
Monic (0 : R[X]) ↔ (∀ f g : R[X], f = g) ∧ ∀ a b : R, a = b :=
Polynomial.monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.trans
⟨by
intro
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton], fun h => subsingleton_iff.mpr h.2⟩
theorem Monic.as_sum (hp : p.Monic) :
p = X ^ p.natDegree + ∑ i ∈ range p.natDegree, C (p.coeff i) * X ^ i := by
conv_lhs => rw [p.as_sum_range_C_mul_X_pow, sum_range_succ_comm]
suffices C (p.coeff p.natDegree) = 1 by rw [this, one_mul]
exact congr_arg C hp
|
theorem ne_zero_of_ne_zero_of_monic (hp : p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) : q ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [Monic.def, leadingCoeff_zero] at hq
rw [← mul_one p, ← C_1, ← hq, C_0, mul_zero] at hp
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Monic.lean | 51 | 55 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Michael Stoll. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Stoll, Thomas Zhu, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LegendreSymbol.QuadraticReciprocity
/-!
# The Jacobi Symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol and prove its main properties.
## Main definitions
We define the Jacobi symbol, `jacobiSym a b`, for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product over the prime factors `p` of `b` of the Legendre symbols `legendreSym p a`.
This agrees with the mathematical definition when `b` is odd.
The prime factors are obtained via `Nat.factors`. Since `Nat.factors 0 = []`,
this implies in particular that `jacobiSym a 0 = 1` for all `a`.
## Main statements
We prove the main properties of the Jacobi symbol, including the following.
* Multiplicativity in both arguments (`jacobiSym.mul_left`, `jacobiSym.mul_right`)
* The value of the symbol is `1` or `-1` when the arguments are coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_one_or_neg_one`)
* The symbol vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and the arguments are not coprime
(`jacobiSym.eq_zero_iff_not_coprime`)
* If the symbol has the value `-1`, then `a : ZMod b` is not a square
(`ZMod.nonsquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); the converse holds when `b = p` is a prime
(`ZMod.nonsquare_iff_jacobiSym_eq_neg_one`); in particular, in this case `a` is a
square mod `p` when the symbol has the value `1` (`ZMod.isSquare_of_jacobiSym_eq_one`).
* Quadratic reciprocity (`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_one_mod_four`,
`jacobiSym.quadratic_reciprocity_three_mod_four`)
* The supplementary laws for `a = -1`, `a = 2`, `a = -2` (`jacobiSym.at_neg_one`,
`jacobiSym.at_two`, `jacobiSym.at_neg_two`)
* The symbol depends on `a` only via its residue class mod `b` (`jacobiSym.mod_left`)
and on `b` only via its residue class mod `4*a` (`jacobiSym.mod_right`)
* A `csimp` rule for `jacobiSym` and `legendreSym` that evaluates `J(a | b)` efficiently by
reducing to the case `0 ≤ a < b` and `a`, `b` odd, and then swaps `a`, `b` and recurses using
quadratic reciprocity.
## Notations
We define the notation `J(a | b)` for `jacobiSym a b`, localized to `NumberTheorySymbols`.
## Tags
Jacobi symbol, quadratic reciprocity
-/
section Jacobi
/-!
### Definition of the Jacobi symbol
We define the Jacobi symbol $\Bigl(\frac{a}{b}\Bigr)$ for integers `a` and natural numbers `b`
as the product of the Legendre symbols $\Bigl(\frac{a}{p}\Bigr)$, where `p` runs through the
prime divisors (with multiplicity) of `b`, as provided by `b.factors`. This agrees with the
Jacobi symbol when `b` is odd and gives less meaningful values when it is not (e.g., the symbol
is `1` when `b = 0`). This is called `jacobiSym a b`.
We define localized notation (locale `NumberTheorySymbols`) `J(a | b)` for the Jacobi
symbol `jacobiSym a b`.
-/
open Nat ZMod
-- Since we need the fact that the factors are prime, we use `List.pmap`.
/-- The Jacobi symbol of `a` and `b` -/
def jacobiSym (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : ℤ :=
(b.primeFactorsList.pmap (fun p pp => @legendreSym p ⟨pp⟩ a) fun _ pf =>
prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList pf).prod
-- Notation for the Jacobi symbol.
@[inherit_doc]
scoped[NumberTheorySymbols] notation "J(" a " | " b ")" => jacobiSym a b
open NumberTheorySymbols
/-!
### Properties of the Jacobi symbol
-/
namespace jacobiSym
/-- The symbol `J(a | 0)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem zero_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 0) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_zero, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The symbol `J(a | 1)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_right (a : ℤ) : J(a | 1) = 1 := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_one, List.prod_nil, List.pmap]
/-- The Legendre symbol `legendreSym p a` with an integer `a` and a prime number `p`
is the same as the Jacobi symbol `J(a | p)`. -/
theorem legendreSym.to_jacobiSym (p : ℕ) [fp : Fact p.Prime] (a : ℤ) :
legendreSym p a = J(a | p) := by
simp only [jacobiSym, primeFactorsList_prime fp.1, List.prod_cons, List.prod_nil, mul_one,
List.pmap]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right' (a : ℤ) {b₁ b₂ : ℕ} (hb₁ : b₁ ≠ 0) (hb₂ : b₂ ≠ 0) :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) := by
rw [jacobiSym, ((perm_primeFactorsList_mul hb₁ hb₂).pmap _).prod_eq, List.pmap_append,
List.prod_append]
pick_goal 2
· exact fun p hp =>
(List.mem_append.mp hp).elim prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList
· rfl
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its second argument. -/
theorem mul_right (a : ℤ) (b₁ b₂ : ℕ) [NeZero b₁] [NeZero b₂] :
J(a | b₁ * b₂) = J(a | b₁) * J(a | b₂) :=
mul_right' a (NeZero.ne b₁) (NeZero.ne b₂)
/-- The Jacobi symbol takes only the values `0`, `1` and `-1`. -/
theorem trichotomy (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = 0 ∨ J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
((MonoidHom.mrange (@SignType.castHom ℤ _ _).toMonoidHom).copy {0, 1, -1} <| by
rw [Set.pair_comm]
exact (SignType.range_eq SignType.castHom).symm).list_prod_mem
(by
intro _ ha'
rcases List.mem_pmap.mp ha' with ⟨p, hp, rfl⟩
haveI : Fact p.Prime := ⟨prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp⟩
exact quadraticChar_isQuadratic (ZMod p) a)
/-- The symbol `J(1 | b)` has the value `1`. -/
@[simp]
theorem one_left (b : ℕ) : J(1 | b) = 1 :=
List.prod_eq_one fun z hz => by
let ⟨p, hp, he⟩ := List.mem_pmap.1 hz
rw [← he, legendreSym.at_one]
/-- The Jacobi symbol is multiplicative in its first argument. -/
theorem mul_left (a₁ a₂ : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a₁ * a₂ | b) = J(a₁ | b) * J(a₂ | b) := by
simp_rw [jacobiSym, List.pmap_eq_map_attach, legendreSym.mul _ _ _]
exact List.prod_map_mul (α := ℤ) (l := (primeFactorsList b).attach)
(f := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₁)
(g := fun x ↦ @legendreSym x {out := prime_of_mem_primeFactorsList x.2} a₂)
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes iff `a` and `b` are not coprime (assuming `b ≠ 0`). -/
theorem eq_zero_iff_not_coprime {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} [NeZero b] : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
List.prod_eq_zero_iff.trans
(by
rw [List.mem_pmap, Int.gcd_eq_natAbs, Ne, Prime.not_coprime_iff_dvd]
simp_rw [legendreSym.eq_zero_iff _ _, intCast_zmod_eq_zero_iff_dvd,
mem_primeFactorsList (NeZero.ne b), ← Int.natCast_dvd, Int.natCast_dvd_natCast, exists_prop,
and_assoc, _root_.and_comm])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` is nonzero when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
protected theorem ne_zero {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ≠ 0 := by
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_right]
exact one_ne_zero
· contrapose! h; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.1 h
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` vanishes if and only if `b ≠ 0` and `a` and `b` are not coprime. -/
theorem eq_zero_iff {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} : J(a | b) = 0 ↔ b ≠ 0 ∧ a.gcd b ≠ 1 :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases eq_or_ne b 0 with hb | hb
· rw [hb, zero_right] at h; cases h
exact ⟨hb, mt jacobiSym.ne_zero <| Classical.not_not.2 h⟩, fun ⟨hb, h⟩ => by
rw [← neZero_iff] at hb; exact eq_zero_iff_not_coprime.2 h⟩
/-- The symbol `J(0 | b)` vanishes when `b > 1`. -/
theorem zero_left {b : ℕ} (hb : 1 < b) : J(0 | b) = 0 :=
(@eq_zero_iff_not_coprime 0 b ⟨ne_zero_of_lt hb⟩).mpr <| by
rw [Int.gcd_zero_left, Int.natAbs_natCast]; exact hb.ne'
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` takes the value `1` or `-1` if `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem eq_one_or_neg_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) = 1 ∨ J(a | b) = -1 :=
(trichotomy a b).resolve_left <| jacobiSym.ne_zero h
/-- We have that `J(a^e | b) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_left (a : ℤ) (e b : ℕ) : J(a ^ e | b) = J(a | b) ^ e :=
Nat.recOn e (by rw [_root_.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_left]) fun _ ih => by
rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_left, ih]
/-- We have that `J(a | b^e) = J(a | b)^e`. -/
theorem pow_right (a : ℤ) (b e : ℕ) : J(a | b ^ e) = J(a | b) ^ e := by
induction e with
| zero => rw [Nat.pow_zero, _root_.pow_zero, one_right]
| succ e ih =>
rcases eq_zero_or_neZero b with hb | _
· rw [hb, zero_pow e.succ_ne_zero, zero_right, one_pow]
· rw [_root_.pow_succ, _root_.pow_succ, mul_right, ih]
/-- The square of `J(a | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a | b) ^ 2 = 1 := by
rcases eq_one_or_neg_one h with h₁ | h₁ <;> rw [h₁] <;> rfl
/-- The symbol `J(a^2 | b)` is `1` when `a` and `b` are coprime. -/
theorem sq_one' {a : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a.gcd b = 1) : J(a ^ 2 | b) = 1 := by rw [pow_left, sq_one h]
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left (a : ℤ) (b : ℕ) : J(a | b) = J(a % b | b) :=
congr_arg List.prod <|
List.pmap_congr_left _
(by
rintro p hp _ h₂
conv_rhs =>
rw [legendreSym.mod, Int.emod_emod_of_dvd _ (Int.natCast_dvd_natCast.2 <|
dvd_of_mem_primeFactorsList hp), ← legendreSym.mod])
/-- The symbol `J(a | b)` depends only on `a` mod `b`. -/
theorem mod_left' {a₁ a₂ : ℤ} {b : ℕ} (h : a₁ % b = a₂ % b) : J(a₁ | b) = J(a₂ | b) := by
rw [mod_left, h, ← mod_left]
/-- If `p` is prime, `J(a | p) = -1` and `p` divides `x^2 - a*y^2`, then `p` must divide
`x` and `y`. -/
theorem prime_dvd_of_eq_neg_one {p : ℕ} [Fact p.Prime] {a : ℤ} (h : J(a | p) = -1) {x y : ℤ}
| (hxy : ↑p ∣ (x ^ 2 - a * y ^ 2 : ℤ)) : ↑p ∣ x ∧ ↑p ∣ y := by
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LegendreSymbol/JacobiSymbol.lean | 227 | 227 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.AbstractFuncEq
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.ModularForms.JacobiTheta.Bounds
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Gamma.Deligne
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.MellinEqDirichlet
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.LSeries.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.RemovableSingularity
/-!
# Even Hurwitz zeta functions
In this file we study the functions on `ℂ` which are the meromorphic continuation of the following
series (convergent for `1 < re s`), where `a ∈ ℝ` is a parameter:
`hurwitzZetaEven a s = 1 / 2 * ∑' n : ℤ, 1 / |n + a| ^ s`
and
`cosZeta a s = ∑' n : ℕ, cos (2 * π * a * n) / |n| ^ s`.
Note that the term for `n = -a` in the first sum is omitted if `a` is an integer, and the term for
`n = 0` is omitted in the second sum (always).
Of course, we cannot *define* these functions by the above formulae (since existence of the
meromorphic continuation is not at all obvious); we in fact construct them as Mellin transforms of
various versions of the Jacobi theta function.
We also define completed versions of these functions with nicer functional equations (satisfying
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a s = Gammaℝ s * hurwitzZetaEven a s`, and similarly for `cosZeta`); and
modified versions with a subscript `0`, which are entire functions differing from the above by
multiples of `1 / s` and `1 / (1 - s)`.
## Main definitions and theorems
* `hurwitzZetaEven` and `cosZeta`: the zeta functions
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven` and `completedCosZeta`: completed variants
* `differentiableAt_hurwitzZetaEven` and `differentiableAt_cosZeta`:
differentiability away from `s = 1`
* `completedHurwitzZetaEven_one_sub`: the functional equation
`completedHurwitzZetaEven a (1 - s) = completedCosZeta a s`
* `hasSum_int_hurwitzZetaEven` and `hasSum_nat_cosZeta`: relation between the zeta functions and
the corresponding Dirichlet series for `1 < re s`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Complex Filter Topology Asymptotics Real Set MeasureTheory
namespace HurwitzZeta
section kernel_defs
/-!
## Definitions and elementary properties of kernels
-/
/-- Even Hurwitz zeta kernel (function whose Mellin transform will be the even part of the
completed Hurwit zeta function). See `evenKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_evenKernel` for an expression as a sum over `ℤ`. -/
@[irreducible] def evenKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic
(fun ξ : ℝ ↦ rexp (-π * ξ ^ 2 * x) * re (jacobiTheta₂ (ξ * I * x) (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ
simp only [ofReal_add, ofReal_one, add_mul, one_mul, jacobiTheta₂_add_left']
have : cexp (-↑π * I * ((I * ↑x) + 2 * (↑ξ * I * ↑x))) = rexp (π * (x + 2 * ξ * x)) := by
ring_nf
simp [I_sq]
rw [this, re_ofReal_mul, ← mul_assoc, ← Real.exp_add]
congr
ring).lift a
lemma evenKernel_def (a x : ℝ) :
↑(evenKernel ↑a x) = cexp (-π * a ^ 2 * x) * jacobiTheta₂ (a * I * x) (I * x) := by
simp [evenKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
/-- For `x ≤ 0` the defining sum diverges, so the kernel is 0. -/
lemma evenKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : evenKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H a' => simp [← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- Cosine Hurwitz zeta kernel. See `cosKernel_def` for the defining formula, and
`hasSum_int_cosKernel` for expression as a sum. -/
@[irreducible] def cosKernel (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(show Function.Periodic (fun ξ : ℝ ↦ re (jacobiTheta₂ ξ (I * x))) 1 by
intro ξ; simp [jacobiTheta₂_add_left]).lift a
lemma cosKernel_def (a x : ℝ) : ↑(cosKernel ↑a x) = jacobiTheta₂ a (I * x) := by
simp [cosKernel, re_eq_add_conj, jacobiTheta₂_conj, ← mul_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℂ)]
lemma cosKernel_undef (a : UnitAddCircle) {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 0) : cosKernel a x = 0 := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← ofReal_inj, cosKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_undef _ (by simpa : (I * ↑x).im ≤ 0)]
/-- For `a = 0`, both kernels agree. -/
lemma evenKernel_eq_cosKernel_of_zero : evenKernel 0 = cosKernel 0 := by
ext1 x
simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, cosKernel_def]
| @[simp]
lemma evenKernel_neg (a : UnitAddCircle) (x : ℝ) : evenKernel (-a) x = evenKernel a x := by
induction a using QuotientAddGroup.induction_on with
| H => simp [← QuotientAddGroup.mk_neg, ← ofReal_inj, evenKernel_def, jacobiTheta₂_neg_left]
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/LSeries/HurwitzZetaEven.lean | 102 | 106 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Rohan Mitta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rohan Mitta, Kevin Buzzard, Alistair Tucker, Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Winston Yin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Topology.EMetricSpace.Diam
/-!
# Lipschitz continuous functions
A map `f : α → β` between two (extended) metric spaces is called *Lipschitz continuous*
with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y` we have `edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y`.
For a metric space, the latter inequality is equivalent to `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`.
There is also a version asserting this inequality only for `x` and `y` in some set `s`.
Finally, `f : α → β` is called *locally Lipschitz continuous* if each `x : α` has a neighbourhood
on which `f` is Lipschitz continuous (with some constant).
In this file we provide various ways to prove that various combinations of Lipschitz continuous
functions are Lipschitz continuous. We also prove that Lipschitz continuous functions are
uniformly continuous, and that locally Lipschitz functions are continuous.
## Main definitions and lemmas
* `LipschitzWith K f`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0`
* `LipschitzOnWith K f s`: states that `f` is Lipschitz with constant `K : ℝ≥0` on a set `s`
* `LipschitzWith.uniformContinuous`: a Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous
* `LipschitzOnWith.uniformContinuousOn`: a function which is Lipschitz on a set `s` is uniformly
continuous on `s`.
* `LocallyLipschitz f`: states that `f` is locally Lipschitz
* `LocallyLipschitzOn f s`: states that `f` is locally Lipschitz on `s`.
* `LocallyLipschitz.continuous`: a locally Lipschitz function is continuous.
## Implementation notes
The parameter `K` has type `ℝ≥0`. This way we avoid conjunction in the definition and have
coercions both to `ℝ` and `ℝ≥0∞`. Constructors whose names end with `'` take `K : ℝ` as an
argument, and return `LipschitzWith (Real.toNNReal K) f`.
-/
universe u v w x
open Filter Function Set Topology NNReal ENNReal Bornology
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {ι : Type x}
section PseudoEMetricSpace
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] {K : ℝ≥0} {s t : Set α} {f : α → β}
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` if for all `x, y`
we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzWith (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) := ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
/-- A function `f` is **Lipschitz continuous** with constant `K ≥ 0` **on `s`** if
for all `x, y` in `s` we have `dist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * dist x y`. -/
def LipschitzOnWith (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) (s : Set α) :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y
/-- `f : α → β` is called **locally Lipschitz continuous** iff every point `x`
has a neighbourhood on which `f` is Lipschitz. -/
def LocallyLipschitz (f : α → β) : Prop := ∀ x, ∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝 x, LipschitzOnWith K f t
/-- `f : α → β` is called **locally Lipschitz continuous** on `s` iff every point `x` of `s`
has a neighbourhood within `s` on which `f` is Lipschitz. -/
def LocallyLipschitzOn (s : Set α) (f : α → β) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∃ K, ∃ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x, LipschitzOnWith K f t
/-- Every function is Lipschitz on the empty set (with any Lipschitz constant). -/
@[simp]
theorem lipschitzOnWith_empty (K : ℝ≥0) (f : α → β) : LipschitzOnWith K f ∅ := fun _ => False.elim
@[simp] lemma locallyLipschitzOn_empty (f : α → β) : LocallyLipschitzOn ∅ f := fun _ ↦ False.elim
/-- Being Lipschitz on a set is monotone w.r.t. that set. -/
theorem LipschitzOnWith.mono (hf : LipschitzOnWith K f t) (h : s ⊆ t) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun _x x_in _y y_in => hf (h x_in) (h y_in)
lemma LocallyLipschitzOn.mono (hf : LocallyLipschitzOn t f) (h : s ⊆ t) : LocallyLipschitzOn s f :=
fun x hx ↦ by obtain ⟨K, u, hu, hfu⟩ := hf (h hx); exact ⟨K, u, nhdsWithin_mono _ h hu, hfu⟩
/-- `f` is Lipschitz iff it is Lipschitz on the entire space. -/
@[simp] lemma lipschitzOnWith_univ : LipschitzOnWith K f univ ↔ LipschitzWith K f := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
@[simp] lemma locallyLipschitzOn_univ : LocallyLipschitzOn univ f ↔ LocallyLipschitz f := by
simp [LocallyLipschitzOn, LocallyLipschitz]
protected lemma LocallyLipschitz.locallyLipschitzOn (h : LocallyLipschitz f) :
LocallyLipschitzOn s f := (locallyLipschitzOn_univ.2 h).mono s.subset_univ
theorem lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict : LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
lemma lipschitzOnWith_restrict {t : Set s} :
LipschitzOnWith K (s.restrict f) t ↔ LipschitzOnWith K f (s ∩ Subtype.val '' t) := by
simp [LipschitzOnWith, LipschitzWith]
lemma locallyLipschitzOn_iff_restrict :
LocallyLipschitzOn s f ↔ LocallyLipschitz (s.restrict f) := by
simp only [LocallyLipschitzOn, LocallyLipschitz, SetCoe.forall', restrict_apply,
Subtype.edist_mk_mk, ← lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict, lipschitzOnWith_restrict,
nhds_subtype_eq_comap_nhdsWithin, mem_comap]
congr! with x K
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hft⟩
exact ⟨_, ⟨t, ht, Subset.rfl⟩, hft.mono <| inter_subset_right.trans <| image_preimage_subset ..⟩
· rintro ⟨t, ⟨u, hu, hut⟩, hft⟩
exact ⟨s ∩ u, Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin hu,
hft.mono fun x hx ↦ ⟨hx.1, ⟨x, hx.1⟩, hut hx.2, rfl⟩⟩
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict, _⟩ := lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LocallyLipschitzOn.restrict, _⟩ := locallyLipschitzOn_iff_restrict
lemma Set.MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict {t : Set β} (h : MapsTo f s t) :
LipschitzOnWith K f s ↔ LipschitzWith K (h.restrict f s t) :=
_root_.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
alias ⟨LipschitzOnWith.to_restrict_mapsTo, _⟩ := Set.MapsTo.lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict
end PseudoEMetricSpace
namespace LipschitzWith
open EMetric
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β] [PseudoEMetricSpace γ]
variable {K : ℝ≥0} {f : α → β} {x y : α} {r : ℝ≥0∞} {s : Set α}
protected theorem lipschitzOnWith (h : LipschitzWith K f) : LipschitzOnWith K f s :=
fun x _ y _ => h x y
theorem edist_le_mul (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) : edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y :=
h x y
theorem edist_le_mul_of_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hr : edist x y ≤ r) :
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * r :=
(h x y).trans <| mul_left_mono hr
theorem edist_lt_mul_of_lt (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (hr : edist x y < r) :
edist (f x) (f y) < K * r :=
(h x y).trans_lt <| (ENNReal.mul_lt_mul_left (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 hK) ENNReal.coe_ne_top).2 hr
theorem mapsTo_emetric_closedBall (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (closedBall x r) (closedBall (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_le_mul_of_le hy
theorem mapsTo_emetric_ball (h : LipschitzWith K f) (hK : K ≠ 0) (x : α) (r : ℝ≥0∞) :
MapsTo f (ball x r) (ball (f x) (K * r)) := fun _y hy => h.edist_lt_mul_of_lt hK hy
theorem edist_lt_top (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} (h : edist x y ≠ ⊤) :
edist (f x) (f y) < ⊤ :=
(hf x y).trans_lt <| ENNReal.mul_lt_top ENNReal.coe_lt_top h.lt_top
theorem mul_edist_le (h : LipschitzWith K f) (x y : α) :
(K⁻¹ : ℝ≥0∞) * edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y := by
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
exact ENNReal.div_le_of_le_mul' (h x y)
protected theorem of_edist_le (h : ∀ x y, edist (f x) (f y) ≤ edist x y) : LipschitzWith 1 f :=
fun x y => by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul, h]
protected theorem weaken (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {K' : ℝ≥0} (h : K ≤ K') : LipschitzWith K' f :=
fun x y => le_trans (hf x y) <| mul_right_mono (ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 h)
theorem ediam_image_le (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) :
EMetric.diam (f '' s) ≤ K * EMetric.diam s := by
apply EMetric.diam_le
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩ _ ⟨y, hy, rfl⟩
exact hf.edist_le_mul_of_le (EMetric.edist_le_diam_of_mem hx hy)
theorem edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {x y : α} {d : ℝ≥0∞}
(h : edist x y < d / K) : edist (f x) (f y) < d :=
calc
edist (f x) (f y) ≤ K * edist x y := hf x y
_ < d := ENNReal.mul_lt_of_lt_div' h
/-- A Lipschitz function is uniformly continuous. -/
protected theorem uniformContinuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : UniformContinuous f :=
EMetric.uniformContinuous_iff.2 fun ε εpos =>
⟨ε / K, ENNReal.div_pos_iff.2 ⟨ne_of_gt εpos, ENNReal.coe_ne_top⟩, hf.edist_lt_of_edist_lt_div⟩
/-- A Lipschitz function is continuous. -/
protected theorem continuous (hf : LipschitzWith K f) : Continuous f :=
hf.uniformContinuous.continuous
/-- Constant functions are Lipschitz (with any constant). -/
protected theorem const (b : β) : LipschitzWith 0 fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
protected theorem const' (b : β) {K : ℝ≥0} : LipschitzWith K fun _ : α => b := fun x y => by
simp only [edist_self, zero_le]
/-- The identity is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem id : LipschitzWith 1 (@id α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
/-- The inclusion of a subset is 1-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem subtype_val (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Subtype.val : s → α) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_rfl
theorem subtype_mk (hf : LipschitzWith K f) {p : β → Prop} (hp : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
LipschitzWith K (fun x => ⟨f x, hp x⟩ : α → { y // p y }) :=
hf
protected theorem eval {α : ι → Type u} [∀ i, PseudoEMetricSpace (α i)] [Fintype ι] (i : ι) :
LipschitzWith 1 (Function.eval i : (∀ i, α i) → α i) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun f g => by convert edist_le_pi_edist f g i
/-- The restriction of a `K`-Lipschitz function is `K`-Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : LipschitzWith K f) (s : Set α) : LipschitzWith K (s.restrict f) :=
fun x y => hf x y
/-- The composition of Lipschitz functions is Lipschitz. -/
protected theorem comp {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f)
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) := fun x y =>
calc
edist (f (g x)) (f (g y)) ≤ Kf * edist (g x) (g y) := hf _ _
_ ≤ Kf * (Kg * edist x y) := mul_left_mono (hg _ _)
_ = (Kf * Kg : ℝ≥0) * edist x y := by rw [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.coe_mul]
theorem comp_lipschitzOnWith {Kf Kg : ℝ≥0} {f : β → γ} {g : α → β} {s : Set α}
(hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) (hg : LipschitzOnWith Kg g s) : LipschitzOnWith (Kf * Kg) (f ∘ g) s :=
lipschitzOnWith_iff_restrict.mpr <| hf.comp hg.to_restrict
protected theorem prod_fst : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.fst α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_left _ _
protected theorem prod_snd : LipschitzWith 1 (@Prod.snd α β) :=
LipschitzWith.of_edist_le fun _ _ => le_max_right _ _
/-- If `f` and `g` are Lipschitz functions, so is the induced map `f × g` to the product type. -/
protected theorem prodMk {f : α → β} {Kf : ℝ≥0} (hf : LipschitzWith Kf f) {g : α → γ} {Kg : ℝ≥0}
(hg : LipschitzWith Kg g) : LipschitzWith (max Kf Kg) fun x => (f x, g x) := by
intro x y
rw [ENNReal.coe_mono.map_max, Prod.edist_eq, max_mul]
exact max_le_max (hf x y) (hg x y)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod := LipschitzWith.prodMk
protected theorem prodMk_left (a : α) : LipschitzWith 1 (Prod.mk a : β → α × β) := by
simpa only [max_eq_right zero_le_one] using (LipschitzWith.const a).prodMk LipschitzWith.id
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod_mk_left := LipschitzWith.prodMk_left
protected theorem prodMk_right (b : β) : LipschitzWith 1 fun a : α => (a, b) := by
simpa only [max_eq_left zero_le_one] using LipschitzWith.id.prodMk (LipschitzWith.const b)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
protected alias prod_mk_right := LipschitzWith.prodMk_right
|
protected theorem uncurry {f : α → β → γ} {Kα Kβ : ℝ≥0} (hα : ∀ b, LipschitzWith Kα fun a => f a b)
(hβ : ∀ a, LipschitzWith Kβ (f a)) : LipschitzWith (Kα + Kβ) (Function.uncurry f) := by
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩
simp only [Function.uncurry, ENNReal.coe_add, add_mul]
apply le_trans (edist_triangle _ (f a₂ b₁) _)
exact
add_le_add (le_trans (hα _ _ _) <| mul_left_mono <| le_max_left _ _)
| Mathlib/Topology/EMetricSpace/Lipschitz.lean | 252 | 259 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Subalgebra.Lattice
import Mathlib.Algebra.Algebra.Tower
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Divisibility
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.MonoidAlgebra.Support
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Pow
import Mathlib.Data.Finsupp.Antidiagonal
import Mathlib.Order.SymmDiff
/-!
# Multivariate polynomials
This file defines polynomial rings over a base ring (or even semiring),
with variables from a general type `σ` (which could be infinite).
## Important definitions
Let `R` be a commutative ring (or a semiring) and let `σ` be an arbitrary
type. This file creates the type `MvPolynomial σ R`, which mathematicians
might denote $R[X_i : i \in σ]$. It is the type of multivariate
(a.k.a. multivariable) polynomials, with variables
corresponding to the terms in `σ`, and coefficients in `R`.
### Notation
In the definitions below, we use the following notation:
+ `σ : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `a : R`
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ R`
### Definitions
* `MvPolynomial σ R` : the type of polynomials with variables of type `σ` and coefficients
in the commutative semiring `R`
* `monomial s a` : the monomial which mathematically would be denoted `a * X^s`
* `C a` : the constant polynomial with value `a`
* `X i` : the degree one monomial corresponding to i; mathematically this might be denoted `Xᵢ`.
* `coeff s p` : the coefficient of `s` in `p`.
## Implementation notes
Recall that if `Y` has a zero, then `X →₀ Y` is the type of functions from `X` to `Y` with finite
support, i.e. such that only finitely many elements of `X` get sent to non-zero terms in `Y`.
The definition of `MvPolynomial σ R` is `(σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R`; here `σ →₀ ℕ` denotes the space of all
monomials in the variables, and the function to `R` sends a monomial to its coefficient in
the polynomial being represented.
## Tags
polynomial, multivariate polynomial, multivariable polynomial
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
open scoped Pointwise
universe u v w x
variable {R : Type u} {S₁ : Type v} {S₂ : Type w} {S₃ : Type x}
/-- Multivariate polynomial, where `σ` is the index set of the variables and
`R` is the coefficient ring -/
def MvPolynomial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :=
AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ)
namespace MvPolynomial
-- Porting note: because of `MvPolynomial.C` and `MvPolynomial.X` this linter throws
-- tons of warnings in this file, and it's easier to just disable them globally in the file
variable {σ : Type*} {a a' a₁ a₂ : R} {e : ℕ} {n m : σ} {s : σ →₀ ℕ}
section CommSemiring
section Instances
instance decidableEqMvPolynomial [CommSemiring R] [DecidableEq σ] [DecidableEq R] :
DecidableEq (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.instDecidableEq
instance commSemiring [CommSemiring R] : CommSemiring (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.commSemiring
instance inhabited [CommSemiring R] : Inhabited (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
⟨0⟩
instance distribuMulAction [Monoid R] [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribMulAction R S₁] :
DistribMulAction R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.distribMulAction
instance smulZeroClass [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] :
SMulZeroClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulZeroClass
instance faithfulSMul [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [FaithfulSMul R S₁] :
FaithfulSMul R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.faithfulSMul
instance module [Semiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Module R S₁] : Module R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.module
instance isScalarTower [CommSemiring S₂] [SMul R S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[IsScalarTower R S₁ S₂] : IsScalarTower R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower
instance smulCommClass [CommSemiring S₂] [SMulZeroClass R S₂] [SMulZeroClass S₁ S₂]
[SMulCommClass R S₁ S₂] : SMulCommClass R S₁ (MvPolynomial σ S₂) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass
instance isCentralScalar [CommSemiring S₁] [SMulZeroClass R S₁] [SMulZeroClass Rᵐᵒᵖ S₁]
[IsCentralScalar R S₁] : IsCentralScalar R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isCentralScalar
instance algebra [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] [Algebra R S₁] :
Algebra R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algebra
instance isScalarTower_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [IsScalarTower R S₁ S₁] :
IsScalarTower R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.isScalarTower_self _
instance smulCommClass_right [CommSemiring S₁] [DistribSMul R S₁] [SMulCommClass R S₁ S₁] :
SMulCommClass R (MvPolynomial σ S₁) (MvPolynomial σ S₁) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.smulCommClass_self _
/-- If `R` is a subsingleton, then `MvPolynomial σ R` has a unique element -/
instance unique [CommSemiring R] [Subsingleton R] : Unique (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.unique
end Instances
variable [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S₁] {p q : MvPolynomial σ R}
/-- `monomial s a` is the monomial with coefficient `a` and exponents given by `s` -/
def monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) : R →ₗ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.lsingle s
theorem one_def : (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 1 := rfl
theorem single_eq_monomial (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) : Finsupp.single s a = monomial s a :=
rfl
theorem mul_def : p * q = p.sum fun m a => q.sum fun n b => monomial (m + n) (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_def
/-- `C a` is the constant polynomial with value `a` -/
def C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
{ singleZeroRingHom with toFun := monomial 0 }
variable (R σ)
@[simp]
theorem algebraMap_eq : algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
variable {R σ}
/-- `X n` is the degree `1` monomial $X_n$. -/
def X (n : σ) : MvPolynomial σ R :=
monomial (Finsupp.single n 1) 1
theorem monomial_left_injective {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
Function.Injective fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s r :=
Finsupp.single_left_injective hr
@[simp]
theorem monomial_left_inj {s t : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
monomial s r = monomial t r ↔ s = t :=
Finsupp.single_left_inj hr
theorem C_apply : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = monomial 0 a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_0 : C 0 = (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) := map_zero _
@[simp]
theorem C_1 : C 1 = (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem C_mul_monomial : C a * monomial s a' = monomial s (a * a') := by
-- Porting note: this `show` feels like defeq abuse, but I can't find the appropriate lemmas
show AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ * AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _ = AddMonoidAlgebra.single _ _
simp [C_apply, single_mul_single]
@[simp]
theorem C_add : (C (a + a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a + C a' :=
Finsupp.single_add _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem C_mul : (C (a * a') : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a * C a' :=
C_mul_monomial.symm
@[simp]
theorem C_pow (a : R) (n : ℕ) : (C (a ^ n) : MvPolynomial σ R) = C a ^ n :=
map_pow _ _ _
theorem C_injective (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] :
Function.Injective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Finsupp.single_injective _
theorem C_surjective {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R] (σ : Type*) [IsEmpty σ] :
Function.Surjective (C : R → MvPolynomial σ R) := by
refine fun p => ⟨p.toFun 0, Finsupp.ext fun a => ?_⟩
simp only [C_apply, ← single_eq_monomial, (Finsupp.ext isEmptyElim (α := σ) : a = 0),
single_eq_same]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem C_inj {σ : Type*} (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] (r s : R) :
(C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = C s ↔ r = s :=
(C_injective σ R).eq_iff
@[simp] lemma C_eq_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by rw [← map_zero C, C_inj]
lemma C_ne_zero : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
C_eq_zero.ne
instance nontrivial_of_nontrivial (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Nontrivial R] :
Nontrivial (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
inferInstanceAs (Nontrivial <| AddMonoidAlgebra R (σ →₀ ℕ))
instance infinite_of_infinite (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [CommSemiring R] [Infinite R] :
Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective C (C_injective _ _)
instance infinite_of_nonempty (σ : Type*) (R : Type*) [Nonempty σ] [CommSemiring R]
[Nontrivial R] : Infinite (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
Infinite.of_injective ((fun s : σ →₀ ℕ => monomial s 1) ∘ Finsupp.single (Classical.arbitrary σ))
<| (monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_injective _)
theorem C_eq_coe_nat (n : ℕ) : (C ↑n : MvPolynomial σ R) = n := by
induction n <;> simp [*]
theorem C_mul' : MvPolynomial.C a * p = a • p :=
(Algebra.smul_def a p).symm
theorem smul_eq_C_mul (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (a : R) : a • p = C a * p :=
C_mul'.symm
theorem C_eq_smul_one : (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a • (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
rw [← C_mul', mul_one]
theorem smul_monomial {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (r : S₁) :
r • monomial s a = monomial s (r • a) :=
Finsupp.smul_single _ _ _
theorem X_injective [Nontrivial R] : Function.Injective (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :=
(monomial_left_injective one_ne_zero).comp (Finsupp.single_left_injective one_ne_zero)
@[simp]
theorem X_inj [Nontrivial R] (m n : σ) : X m = (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) ↔ m = n :=
X_injective.eq_iff
theorem monomial_pow : monomial s a ^ e = monomial (e • s) (a ^ e) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_pow e
@[simp]
theorem monomial_mul {s s' : σ →₀ ℕ} {a b : R} :
monomial s a * monomial s' b = monomial (s + s') (a * b) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_single
variable (σ R)
/-- `fun s ↦ monomial s 1` as a homomorphism. -/
def monomialOneHom : Multiplicative (σ →₀ ℕ) →* MvPolynomial σ R :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.of _ _
variable {σ R}
@[simp]
theorem monomialOneHom_apply : monomialOneHom R σ s = (monomial s 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
rfl
theorem X_pow_eq_monomial : X n ^ e = monomial (Finsupp.single n e) (1 : R) := by
simp [X, monomial_pow]
theorem monomial_add_single : monomial (s + Finsupp.single n e) a = monomial s a * X n ^ e := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_single_add : monomial (Finsupp.single n e + s) a = X n ^ e * monomial s a := by
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, monomial_mul, one_mul]
theorem C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} {n : ℕ} :
C a * X s ^ n = monomial (Finsupp.single s n) a := by
rw [← zero_add (Finsupp.single s n), monomial_add_single, C_apply]
theorem C_mul_X_eq_monomial {s : σ} {a : R} : C a * X s = monomial (Finsupp.single s 1) a := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} : monomial s (0 : R) = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_zero _
@[simp]
theorem monomial_zero' : (monomial (0 : σ →₀ ℕ) : R → MvPolynomial σ R) = C :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem monomial_eq_zero {s : σ →₀ ℕ} {b : R} : monomial s b = 0 ↔ b = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_zero
@[simp]
theorem sum_monomial_eq {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {u : σ →₀ ℕ} {r : R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A}
(w : b u 0 = 0) : sum (monomial u r) b = b u r :=
Finsupp.sum_single_index w
@[simp]
theorem sum_C {A : Type*} [AddCommMonoid A] {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} (w : b 0 0 = 0) :
sum (C a) b = b 0 a :=
sum_monomial_eq w
theorem monomial_sum_one {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) :
(monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) 1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 :=
map_prod (monomialOneHom R σ) (fun i => Multiplicative.ofAdd (f i)) s
theorem monomial_sum_index {α : Type*} (s : Finset α) (f : α → σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R) :
monomial (∑ i ∈ s, f i) a = C a * ∏ i ∈ s, monomial (f i) 1 := by
rw [← monomial_sum_one, C_mul', ← (monomial _).map_smul, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
theorem monomial_finsupp_sum_index {α β : Type*} [Zero β] (f : α →₀ β) (g : α → β → σ →₀ ℕ)
(a : R) : monomial (f.sum g) a = C a * f.prod fun a b => monomial (g a b) 1 :=
monomial_sum_index _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq_monomial_iff {α : Type*} (a₁ a₂ : α →₀ ℕ) (b₁ b₂ : R) :
monomial a₁ b₁ = monomial a₂ b₂ ↔ a₁ = a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ b₁ = 0 ∧ b₂ = 0 :=
Finsupp.single_eq_single_iff _ _ _ _
theorem monomial_eq : monomial s a = C a * (s.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
simp only [X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index, Finsupp.sum_single]
@[simp]
lemma prod_X_pow_eq_monomial : ∏ x ∈ s.support, X x ^ s x = monomial s (1 : R) := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_one, one_mul, Finsupp.prod]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on_monomial {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop}
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : ∀ s a, motive (monomial s a) := by
intro s a
apply @Finsupp.induction σ ℕ _ _ s
· show motive (monomial 0 a)
exact C a
· intro n e p _hpn _he ih
have : ∀ e : ℕ, motive (monomial p a * X n ^ e) := by
intro e
induction e with
| zero => simp [ih]
| succ e e_ih => simp [ih, pow_succ, (mul_assoc _ _ _).symm, mul_X, e_ih]
simp [add_comm, monomial_add_single, this]
/-- Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on'`.
To prove something about mv_polynomials,
it suffices to show the condition is closed under taking sums,
and it holds for monomials. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem induction_on' {P : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(monomial : ∀ (u : σ →₀ ℕ) (a : R), P (monomial u a))
(add : ∀ p q : MvPolynomial σ R, P p → P q → P (p + q)) : P p :=
Finsupp.induction p
(suffices P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) by rwa [monomial_zero] at this
show P (MvPolynomial.monomial 0 0) from monomial 0 0)
fun _ _ _ _ha _hb hPf => add _ _ (monomial _ _) hPf
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a weak form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of nontrivial monomials not present in the support.
-/
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem monomial_add_induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive ((monomial a b) + f)) :
motive p :=
Finsupp.induction p (C_0.rec <| C 0) monomial_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-11")]
alias induction_on''' := monomial_add_induction_on
/--
Similar to `MvPolynomial.induction_on` but only a yet weaker form of `h_add` is required.
In particular, this version only requires us to show
that `motive` is closed under addition of monomials not present in the support
for which `motive` is already known to hold.
-/
theorem induction_on'' {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(monomial_add :
∀ (a : σ →₀ ℕ) (b : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ R),
a ∉ f.support → b ≠ 0 → motive f → motive (monomial a b) →
motive ((monomial a b) + f))
(mul_X : ∀ (p : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ), motive p → motive (p * MvPolynomial.X n)) :
motive p :=
monomial_add_induction_on p C fun a b f ha hb hf =>
monomial_add a b f ha hb hf <| induction_on_monomial C mul_X a b
/--
Analog of `Polynomial.induction_on`.
If a property holds for any constant polynomial
and is preserved under addition and multiplication by variables
then it holds for all multivariate polynomials.
-/
@[recursor 5]
theorem induction_on {motive : MvPolynomial σ R → Prop} (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
(C : ∀ a, motive (C a))
(add : ∀ p q, motive p → motive q → motive (p + q))
(mul_X : ∀ p n, motive p → motive (p * X n)) : motive p :=
induction_on'' p C (fun a b f _ha _hb hf hm => add (monomial a b) f hm hf) mul_X
theorem ringHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : ∀ r, f (C r) = g (C r)) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g := by
refine AddMonoidAlgebra.ringHom_ext' ?_ ?_
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): this has high priority, but Lean still chooses `RingHom.ext`, why?
-- probably because of the type synonym
· ext x
exact hC _
· apply Finsupp.mulHom_ext'; intros x
-- Porting note (https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/11041): `Finsupp.mulHom_ext'` needs to have increased priority
apply MonoidHom.ext_mnat
exact hX _
/-- See note [partially-applied ext lemmas]. -/
@[ext 1100]
theorem ringHom_ext' {A : Type*} [Semiring A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* A}
(hC : f.comp C = g.comp C) (hX : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
ringHom_ext (RingHom.ext_iff.1 hC) hX
theorem hom_eq_hom [Semiring S₂] (f g : MvPolynomial σ R →+* S₂) (hC : f.comp C = g.comp C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = g (X n)) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = g p :=
RingHom.congr_fun (ringHom_ext' hC hX) p
theorem is_id (f : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) (hC : f.comp C = C)
(hX : ∀ n : σ, f (X n) = X n) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : f p = p :=
hom_eq_hom f (RingHom.id _) hC hX p
@[ext 1100]
theorem algHom_ext' {A B : Type*} [CommSemiring A] [CommSemiring B] [Algebra R A] [Algebra R B]
{f g : MvPolynomial σ A →ₐ[R] B}
(h₁ :
f.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)) =
g.comp (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R A (MvPolynomial σ A)))
(h₂ : ∀ i, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AlgHom.coe_ringHom_injective (MvPolynomial.ringHom_ext' (congr_arg AlgHom.toRingHom h₁) h₂)
@[ext 1200]
theorem algHom_ext {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A}
(hf : ∀ i : σ, f (X i) = g (X i)) : f = g :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.algHom_ext' (mulHom_ext' fun X : σ => MonoidHom.ext_mnat (hf X))
@[simp]
theorem algHom_C {A : Type*} [Semiring A] [Algebra R A] (f : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] A) (r : R) :
f (C r) = algebraMap R A r :=
f.commutes r
@[simp]
theorem adjoin_range_X : Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R)) = ⊤ := by
set S := Algebra.adjoin R (range (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R))
refine top_unique fun p hp => ?_; clear hp
induction p using MvPolynomial.induction_on with
| C => exact S.algebraMap_mem _
| add p q hp hq => exact S.add_mem hp hq
| mul_X p i hp => exact S.mul_mem hp (Algebra.subset_adjoin <| mem_range_self _)
@[ext]
theorem linearMap_ext {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M] {f g : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] M}
(h : ∀ s, f ∘ₗ monomial s = g ∘ₗ monomial s) : f = g :=
Finsupp.lhom_ext' h
section Support
/-- The finite set of all `m : σ →₀ ℕ` such that `X^m` has a non-zero coefficient. -/
def support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset (σ →₀ ℕ) :=
Finsupp.support p
theorem finsupp_support_eq_support (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finsupp.support p = p.support :=
rfl
theorem support_monomial [h : Decidable (a = 0)] :
(monomial s a).support = if a = 0 then ∅ else {s} := by
rw [← Subsingleton.elim (Classical.decEq R a 0) h]
rfl
theorem support_monomial_subset : (monomial s a).support ⊆ {s} :=
support_single_subset
theorem support_add [DecidableEq σ] : (p + q).support ⊆ p.support ∪ q.support :=
Finsupp.support_add
theorem support_X [Nontrivial R] : (X n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single n 1} := by
classical rw [X, support_monomial, if_neg]; exact one_ne_zero
theorem support_X_pow [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s ^ n : MvPolynomial σ R).support = {Finsupp.single s n} := by
classical
rw [X_pow_eq_monomial, support_monomial, if_neg (one_ne_zero' R)]
@[simp]
theorem support_zero : (0 : MvPolynomial σ R).support = ∅ :=
rfl
theorem support_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] {a : S₁} {f : MvPolynomial σ R} :
(a • f).support ⊆ f.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul
theorem support_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq σ] {s : Finset α} {f : α → MvPolynomial σ R} :
(∑ x ∈ s, f x).support ⊆ s.biUnion fun x => (f x).support :=
Finsupp.support_finset_sum
end Support
section Coeff
/-- The coefficient of the monomial `m` in the multi-variable polynomial `p`. -/
def coeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : R :=
@DFunLike.coe ((σ →₀ ℕ) →₀ R) _ _ _ p m
@[simp]
theorem mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∈ p.support ↔ p.coeff m ≠ 0 := by
simp [support, coeff]
theorem not_mem_support_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {m : σ →₀ ℕ} : m ∉ p.support ↔ p.coeff m = 0 :=
by simp
theorem sum_def {A} [AddCommMonoid A] {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {b : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R → A} :
p.sum b = ∑ m ∈ p.support, b m (p.coeff m) := by simp [support, Finsupp.sum, coeff]
theorem support_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * q).support ⊆ p.support + q.support :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul p q
@[ext]
theorem ext (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : (∀ m, coeff m p = coeff m q) → p = q :=
Finsupp.ext
@[simp]
theorem coeff_add (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (p + q) = coeff m p + coeff m q :=
add_apply p q m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_smul {S₁ : Type*} [SMulZeroClass S₁ R] (m : σ →₀ ℕ) (C : S₁) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (C • p) = C • coeff m p :=
smul_apply C p m
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : coeff m (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_X (i : σ) : coeff 0 (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 :=
single_eq_of_ne fun h => by cases Finsupp.single_eq_zero.1 h
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to an `AddMonoidHom`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffAddMonoidHom (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →+ R where
toFun := coeff m
map_zero' := coeff_zero m
map_add' := coeff_add m
variable (R) in
/-- `MvPolynomial.coeff m` but promoted to a `LinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def lcoeff (m : σ →₀ ℕ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₗ[R] R where
toFun := coeff m
map_add' := coeff_add m
map_smul' := coeff_smul m
theorem coeff_sum {X : Type*} (s : Finset X) (f : X → MvPolynomial σ R) (m : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff m (∑ x ∈ s, f x) = ∑ x ∈ s, coeff m (f x) :=
map_sum (@coeffAddMonoidHom R σ _ _) _ s
theorem monic_monomial_eq (m) :
monomial m (1 : R) = (m.prod fun n e => X n ^ e : MvPolynomial σ R) := by simp [monomial_eq]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (m n) (a) :
coeff m (monomial n a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if n = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C [DecidableEq σ] (m) (a) :
coeff m (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then a else 0 :=
Finsupp.single_apply
lemma eq_C_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty σ] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p = C (p.coeff 0) := by
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := C_surjective σ p
simp
theorem coeff_one [DecidableEq σ] (m) : coeff m (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = if 0 = m then 1 else 0 :=
coeff_C m 1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_C (a) : coeff 0 (C a : MvPolynomial σ R) = a :=
single_eq_same
@[simp]
theorem coeff_zero_one : coeff 0 (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 :=
coeff_zero_C 1
theorem coeff_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) (k : ℕ) :
coeff m (X i ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i k = m then 1 else 0 := by
have := coeff_monomial m (Finsupp.single i k) (1 : R)
rwa [@monomial_eq _ _ (1 : R) (Finsupp.single i k) _, C_1, one_mul, Finsupp.prod_single_index]
at this
exact pow_zero _
theorem coeff_X' [DecidableEq σ] (i : σ) (m) :
coeff m (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = if Finsupp.single i 1 = m then 1 else 0 := by
rw [← coeff_X_pow, pow_one]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X (i : σ) : coeff (Finsupp.single i 1) (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 1 := by
classical rw [coeff_X', if_pos rfl]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_C_mul (m) (a : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : coeff m (C a * p) = a * coeff m p := by
classical
rw [mul_def, sum_C]
· simp +contextual [sum_def, coeff_sum]
simp
theorem coeff_mul [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) (n : σ →₀ ℕ) :
coeff n (p * q) = ∑ x ∈ Finset.antidiagonal n, coeff x.1 p * coeff x.2 q :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_apply_antidiagonal p q _ _ Finset.mem_antidiagonal
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_monomial (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + s) (p * monomial s r) = coeff m p * r :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.mul_single_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_left_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_monomial_mul (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (s + m) (monomial s r * p) = r * coeff m p :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.single_mul_apply_aux p _ _ _ _ fun _a _ => add_right_inj _
@[simp]
theorem coeff_mul_X (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (m + Finsupp.single s 1) (p * X s) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_mul_monomial _ _ _ _).trans (mul_one _)
@[simp]
theorem coeff_X_mul (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff (Finsupp.single s 1 + m) (X s * p) = coeff m p :=
(coeff_monomial_mul _ _ _ _).trans (one_mul _)
lemma coeff_single_X_pow [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n n' : ℕ) :
(X (R := R) s ^ n).coeff (Finsupp.single s' n')
= if s = s' ∧ n = n' ∨ n = 0 ∧ n' = 0 then 1 else 0 := by
simp only [coeff_X_pow, single_eq_single_iff]
@[simp]
lemma coeff_single_X [DecidableEq σ] (s s' : σ) (n : ℕ) :
(X s).coeff (R := R) (Finsupp.single s' n) = if n = 1 ∧ s = s' then 1 else 0 := by
simpa [eq_comm, and_comm] using coeff_single_X_pow s s' 1 n
@[simp]
theorem support_mul_X (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(p * X s).support = p.support.map (addRightEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_mul_single p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_X_mul (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(X s * p).support = p.support.map (addLeftEmbedding (Finsupp.single s 1)) :=
AddMonoidAlgebra.support_single_mul p _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem support_smul_eq {S₁ : Type*} [Semiring S₁] [Module S₁ R] [NoZeroSMulDivisors S₁ R] {a : S₁}
(h : a ≠ 0) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : (a • p).support = p.support :=
Finsupp.support_smul_eq h
theorem support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support \ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
intro m hm
simp only [Classical.not_not, mem_support_iff, Finset.mem_sdiff, Ne] at hm
simp [hm.2, hm.1]
open scoped symmDiff in
theorem support_symmDiff_support_subset_support_add [DecidableEq σ] (p q : MvPolynomial σ R) :
p.support ∆ q.support ⊆ (p + q).support := by
rw [symmDiff_def, Finset.sup_eq_union]
apply Finset.union_subset
· exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add p q
· rw [add_comm]
exact support_sdiff_support_subset_support_add q p
theorem coeff_mul_monomial' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * monomial s r) = if s ≤ m then coeff (m - s) p * r else 0 := by
classical
split_ifs with h
· conv_rhs => rw [← coeff_mul_monomial _ s]
congr with t
rw [tsub_add_cancel_of_le h]
· contrapose! h
rw [← mem_support_iff] at h
obtain ⟨j, -, rfl⟩ : ∃ j ∈ support p, j + s = m := by
simpa [Finset.mem_add]
using Finset.add_subset_add_left support_monomial_subset <| support_mul _ _ h
exact le_add_left le_rfl
theorem coeff_monomial_mul' (m) (s : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (monomial s r * p) = if s ≤ m then r * coeff (m - s) p else 0 := by
-- note that if we allow `R` to be non-commutative we will have to duplicate the proof above.
rw [mul_comm, mul_comm r]
exact coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _
theorem coeff_mul_X' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (p * X s) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_mul_monomial' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
mul_one]
theorem coeff_X_mul' [DecidableEq σ] (m) (s : σ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
coeff m (X s * p) = if s ∈ m.support then coeff (m - Finsupp.single s 1) p else 0 := by
refine (coeff_monomial_mul' _ _ _ _).trans ?_
simp_rw [Finsupp.single_le_iff, Finsupp.mem_support_iff, Nat.succ_le_iff, pos_iff_ne_zero,
one_mul]
theorem eq_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p = 0 ↔ ∀ d, coeff d p = 0 := by
rw [MvPolynomial.ext_iff]
simp only [coeff_zero]
theorem ne_zero_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p ≠ 0 ↔ ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Ne, eq_zero_iff]
push_neg
rfl
@[simp]
theorem X_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (s : σ) :
X (R := R) s ≠ 0 := by
rw [ne_zero_iff]
use Finsupp.single s 1
simp only [coeff_X, ne_eq, one_ne_zero, not_false_eq_true]
@[simp]
theorem support_eq_empty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support = ∅ ↔ p = 0 :=
Finsupp.support_eq_empty
@[simp]
lemma support_nonempty {p : MvPolynomial σ R} : p.support.Nonempty ↔ p ≠ 0 := by
rw [Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty, ne_eq, support_eq_empty]
theorem exists_coeff_ne_zero {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (h : p ≠ 0) : ∃ d, coeff d p ≠ 0 :=
ne_zero_iff.mp h
theorem C_dvd_iff_dvd_coeff (r : R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : C r ∣ φ ↔ ∀ i, r ∣ φ.coeff i := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨φ, rfl⟩ c
rw [coeff_C_mul]
apply dvd_mul_right
· intro h
choose C hc using h
classical
let c' : (σ →₀ ℕ) → R := fun i => if i ∈ φ.support then C i else 0
let ψ : MvPolynomial σ R := ∑ i ∈ φ.support, monomial i (c' i)
use ψ
apply MvPolynomial.ext
intro i
simp only [ψ, c', coeff_C_mul, coeff_sum, coeff_monomial, Finset.sum_ite_eq']
split_ifs with hi
· rw [hc]
· rw [not_mem_support_iff] at hi
rwa [mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X : IsRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) := by
suffices IsLeftRegular (X n : MvPolynomial σ R) from
⟨this, this.right_of_commute <| Commute.all _⟩
intro P Q (hPQ : (X n) * P = (X n) * Q)
ext i
rw [← coeff_X_mul i n P, hPQ, coeff_X_mul i n Q]
@[simp] lemma isRegular_X_pow (k : ℕ) : IsRegular (X n ^ k : MvPolynomial σ R) := isRegular_X.pow k
@[simp] lemma isRegular_prod_X (s : Finset σ) :
IsRegular (∏ n ∈ s, X n : MvPolynomial σ R) :=
IsRegular.prod fun _ _ ↦ isRegular_X
/-- The finset of nonzero coefficients of a multivariate polynomial. -/
def coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : Finset R :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.image p.coeff p.support
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_zero : coeffs (0 : MvPolynomial σ R) = ∅ :=
rfl
lemma coeffs_one : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) ⊆ {1} := by
classical
rw [coeffs, Finset.image_subset_iff]
simp_all [coeff_one]
@[nontriviality]
lemma coeffs_eq_empty_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton R] (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p.coeffs = ∅ := by
simpa [coeffs] using Subsingleton.eq_zero p
@[simp]
lemma coeffs_one_of_nontrivial [Nontrivial R] : coeffs (1 : MvPolynomial σ R) = {1} := by
apply Finset.Subset.antisymm coeffs_one
simp only [coeffs, Finset.singleton_subset_iff, Finset.mem_image]
exact ⟨0, by simp⟩
lemma mem_coeffs_iff {p : MvPolynomial σ R} {c : R} :
c ∈ p.coeffs ↔ ∃ n ∈ p.support, c = p.coeff n := by
simp [coeffs, eq_comm, (Finset.mem_image)]
lemma coeff_mem_coeffs {p : MvPolynomial σ R} (m : σ →₀ ℕ)
(h : p.coeff m ≠ 0) : p.coeff m ∈ p.coeffs :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
Finset.mem_image_of_mem p.coeff (mem_support_iff.mpr h)
lemma zero_not_mem_coeffs (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : 0 ∉ p.coeffs := by
intro hz
obtain ⟨n, hnsupp, hn⟩ := mem_coeffs_iff.mp hz
exact (mem_support_iff.mp hnsupp) hn.symm
end Coeff
section ConstantCoeff
/-- `constantCoeff p` returns the constant term of the polynomial `p`, defined as `coeff 0 p`.
This is a ring homomorphism.
-/
def constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R →+* R where
toFun := coeff 0
map_one' := by simp [AddMonoidAlgebra.one_def]
map_mul' := by classical simp [coeff_mul, Finsupp.support_single_ne_zero]
map_zero' := coeff_zero _
map_add' := coeff_add _
theorem constantCoeff_eq : (constantCoeff : MvPolynomial σ R → R) = coeff 0 :=
rfl
variable (σ) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_C (r : R) : constantCoeff (C r : MvPolynomial σ R) = r := by
classical simp [constantCoeff_eq]
variable (R) in
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_X (i : σ) : constantCoeff (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = 0 := by
simp [constantCoeff_eq]
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_smul {R : Type*} [SMulZeroClass R S₁] (a : R) (f : MvPolynomial σ S₁) :
constantCoeff (a • f) = a • constantCoeff f :=
rfl
theorem constantCoeff_monomial [DecidableEq σ] (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
constantCoeff (monomial d r) = if d = 0 then r else 0 := by
rw [constantCoeff_eq, coeff_monomial]
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem constantCoeff_comp_C : constantCoeff.comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id R := by
ext x
exact constantCoeff_C σ x
theorem constantCoeff_comp_algebraMap :
constantCoeff.comp (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial σ R)) = RingHom.id R :=
constantCoeff_comp_C _ _
end ConstantCoeff
section AsSum
@[simp]
theorem support_sum_monomial_coeff (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p)) = p :=
Finsupp.sum_single p
theorem as_sum (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : p = ∑ v ∈ p.support, monomial v (coeff v p) :=
(support_sum_monomial_coeff p).symm
end AsSum
section coeffsIn
variable {R S σ : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
section Module
variable [Module R S] {M N : Submodule R S} {p : MvPolynomial σ S} {s : σ} {i : σ →₀ ℕ} {x : S}
{n : ℕ}
variable (σ M) in
/-- The `R`-submodule of multivariate polynomials whose coefficients lie in a `R`-submodule `M`. -/
@[simps]
def coeffsIn : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S) where
carrier := {p | ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M}
add_mem' := by simp+contextual [add_mem]
zero_mem' := by simp
smul_mem' := by simp+contextual [Submodule.smul_mem]
lemma mem_coeffsIn : p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ ∀ i, p.coeff i ∈ M := .rfl
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_monomial]
exact ⟨fun h ↦ by simpa using h i, fun hs j ↦ by split <;> simp [hs]⟩
@[simp]
lemma C_mem_coeffsIn : C x ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ x ∈ M := by simpa using monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := 0)
@[simp]
lemma one_coeffsIn : 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ 1 ∈ M := by simpa using C_mem_coeffsIn (x := (1 : S))
@[simp]
lemma mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn : p * monomial i 1 ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
classical
simp only [mem_coeffsIn, coeff_mul_monomial', Finsupp.mem_support_iff]
constructor
· rintro hp j
simpa using hp (j + i)
· rintro hp i
split <;> simp [hp]
@[simp]
lemma monomial_mul_mem_coeffsIn : monomial i 1 * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simp [mul_comm]
@[simp]
lemma mul_X_mem_coeffsIn : p * X s ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by
simpa [-mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn] using mul_monomial_mem_coeffsIn (i := .single s 1)
@[simp]
lemma X_mul_mem_coeffsIn : X s * p ∈ coeffsIn σ M ↔ p ∈ coeffsIn σ M := by simp [mul_comm]
variable (M) in
lemma coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial : coeffsIn σ M = .span R {monomial i m | (m ∈ M) (i : σ →₀ ℕ)} := by
classical
refine le_antisymm ?_ <| Submodule.span_le.2 ?_
· rintro p hp
rw [p.as_sum]
exact sum_mem fun i hi ↦ Submodule.subset_span ⟨_, hp i, _, rfl⟩
· rintro _ ⟨m, hm, s, n, rfl⟩ i
simp [coeff_X_pow]
split <;> simp [hm]
lemma coeffsIn_le {N : Submodule R (MvPolynomial σ S)} :
coeffsIn σ M ≤ N ↔ ∀ m ∈ M, ∀ i, monomial i m ∈ N := by
simp [coeffsIn_eq_span_monomial, Submodule.span_le, Set.subset_def,
forall_swap (α := MvPolynomial σ S)]
end Module
section Algebra
variable [Algebra R S] {M : Submodule R S}
lemma coeffsIn_mul (M N : Submodule R S) : coeffsIn σ (M * N) = coeffsIn σ M * coeffsIn σ N := by
classical
refine le_antisymm (coeffsIn_le.2 ?_) ?_
· intros r hr s
induction hr using Submodule.mul_induction_on' with
| mem_mul_mem m hm n hn =>
rw [← add_zero s, ← monomial_mul]
apply Submodule.mul_mem_mul <;> simpa
| add x _ y _ hx hy =>
simpa [map_add] using add_mem hx hy
· rw [Submodule.mul_le]
intros x hx y hy k
rw [MvPolynomial.coeff_mul]
exact sum_mem fun c hc ↦ Submodule.mul_mem_mul (hx _) (hy _)
lemma coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, n ≠ 0 → ∀ M : Submodule R S, coeffsIn σ (M ^ n) = coeffsIn σ M ^ n
| 1, _, M => by simp
| n + 2, _, M => by rw [pow_succ, coeffsIn_mul, coeffsIn_pow, ← pow_succ]; exact n.succ_ne_zero
lemma le_coeffsIn_pow : ∀ {n}, coeffsIn σ M ^ n ≤ coeffsIn σ (M ^ n)
| 0 => by simpa using ⟨1, map_one _⟩
| n + 1 => (coeffsIn_pow n.succ_ne_zero _).ge
end Algebra
end coeffsIn
end CommSemiring
end MvPolynomial
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Basic.lean | 1,081 | 1,082 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Action.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.End
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Extra lemmas about permutations
This file proves miscellaneous lemmas about `Equiv.Perm`.
## TODO
Most of the content of this file was moved to `Algebra.Group.End` in
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/22141.
It would be good to merge the remaining lemmas with other files, eg `GroupTheory.Perm.ViaEmbedding`
looks like it could benefit from such a treatment (splitting into the algebra and non-algebra parts)
-/
universe u v
namespace Equiv
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v}
namespace Perm
@[simp] lemma image_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ '' s = f ⁻¹' s := f⁻¹.image_eq_preimage _
@[simp] lemma preimage_inv (f : Perm α) (s : Set α) : ↑f⁻¹ ⁻¹' s = f '' s :=
(f.image_eq_preimage _).symm
end Perm
section Swap
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem swap_smul_self_smul [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) (x : β) :
swap i j • swap i j • x = x := by simp [smul_smul]
theorem swap_smul_involutive [MulAction (Perm α) β] (i j : α) :
Function.Involutive (swap i j • · : β → β) := swap_smul_self_smul i j
end Swap
end Equiv
open Equiv Function
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} {f : Perm α} {s : Set α}
lemma BijOn.perm_inv (hf : BijOn f s s) : BijOn ↑(f⁻¹) s s := hf.symm f.invOn
lemma MapsTo.perm_pow : MapsTo f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, MapsTo (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact MapsTo.iterate
lemma SurjOn.perm_pow : SurjOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, SurjOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact SurjOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_pow : BijOn f s s → ∀ n : ℕ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s := by
simp_rw [Equiv.Perm.coe_pow]; exact BijOn.iterate
lemma BijOn.perm_zpow (hf : BijOn f s s) : ∀ n : ℤ, BijOn (f ^ n) s s
| Int.ofNat n => hf.perm_pow n
| Int.negSucc n => (hf.perm_pow (n + 1)).perm_inv
end Set
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Perm/Basic.lean | 711 | 712 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Sébastien Gouëzel, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Projection
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Lp.PiLp
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FiniteDimensional.Lemmas
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.UnitaryGroup
import Mathlib.Util.Superscript
/-!
# `L²` inner product space structure on finite products of inner product spaces
The `L²` norm on a finite product of inner product spaces is compatible with an inner product
$$
\langle x, y\rangle = \sum \langle x_i, y_i \rangle.
$$
This is recorded in this file as an inner product space instance on `PiLp 2`.
This file develops the notion of a finite dimensional Hilbert space over `𝕜 = ℂ, ℝ`, referred to as
`E`. We define an `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι E` as a linear isometric equivalence
between `E` and `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`. Then `stdOrthonormalBasis` shows that such an equivalence
always exists if `E` is finite dimensional. We provide language for converting between a basis
that is orthonormal and an orthonormal basis (e.g. `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`). We show that
orthonormal bases for each summand in a direct sum of spaces can be combined into an orthonormal
basis for the whole sum in `DirectSum.IsInternal.subordinateOrthonormalBasis`. In
the last section, various properties of matrices are explored.
## Main definitions
- `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n`: defined to be `PiLp 2 (n → 𝕜)` for any `Fintype n`, i.e., the space
from functions to `n` to `𝕜` with the `L²` norm. We register several instances on it (notably
that it is a finite-dimensional inner product space), and provide a `!ₚ[]` notation (for numeric
subscripts like `₂`) for the case when the indexing type is `Fin n`.
- `OrthonormalBasis 𝕜 ι`: defined to be an isometry to Euclidean space from a given
finite-dimensional inner product space, `E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`.
- `Basis.toOrthonormalBasis`: constructs an `OrthonormalBasis` for a finite-dimensional
Euclidean space from a `Basis` which is `Orthonormal`.
- `Orthonormal.exists_orthonormalBasis_extension`: provides an existential result of an
`OrthonormalBasis` extending a given orthonormal set
- `exists_orthonormalBasis`: provides an orthonormal basis on a finite dimensional vector space
- `stdOrthonormalBasis`: provides an arbitrarily-chosen `OrthonormalBasis` of a given finite
dimensional inner product space
For consequences in infinite dimension (Hilbert bases, etc.), see the file
`Analysis.InnerProductSpace.L2Space`.
-/
open Real Set Filter RCLike Submodule Function Uniformity Topology NNReal ENNReal
ComplexConjugate DirectSum
noncomputable section
variable {ι ι' 𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [InnerProductSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F]
variable {F' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [InnerProductSpace ℝ F']
local notation "⟪" x ", " y "⟫" => @inner 𝕜 _ _ x y
/-
If `ι` is a finite type and each space `f i`, `i : ι`, is an inner product space,
then `Π i, f i` is an inner product space as well. Since `Π i, f i` is endowed with the sup norm,
we use instead `PiLp 2 f` for the product space, which is endowed with the `L^2` norm.
-/
instance PiLp.innerProductSpace {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] (f : ι → Type*)
[∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)] [∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] :
InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (PiLp 2 f) where
inner x y := ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i)
norm_sq_eq_re_inner x := by
simp only [PiLp.norm_sq_eq_of_L2, map_sum, ← norm_sq_eq_re_inner, one_div]
conj_inner_symm := by
intro x y
unfold inner
rw [map_sum]
apply Finset.sum_congr rfl
rintro z -
apply inner_conj_symm
add_left x y z :=
show (∑ i, inner (x i + y i) (z i)) = (∑ i, inner (x i) (z i)) + ∑ i, inner (y i) (z i) by
simp only [inner_add_left, Finset.sum_add_distrib]
smul_left x y r :=
show (∑ i : ι, inner (r • x i) (y i)) = conj r * ∑ i, inner (x i) (y i) by
simp only [Finset.mul_sum, inner_smul_left]
@[simp]
theorem PiLp.inner_apply {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {f : ι → Type*} [∀ i, NormedAddCommGroup (f i)]
[∀ i, InnerProductSpace 𝕜 (f i)] (x y : PiLp 2 f) : ⟪x, y⟫ = ∑ i, ⟪x i, y i⟫ :=
rfl
/-- The standard real/complex Euclidean space, functions on a finite type. For an `n`-dimensional
space use `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 (Fin n)`.
For the case when `n = Fin _`, there is `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation for building elements of this type,
analogous to `![x, y, ...]` notation. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace (𝕜 : Type*) (n : Type*) : Type _ :=
PiLp 2 fun _ : n => 𝕜
section Notation
open Lean Meta Elab Term Macro TSyntax PrettyPrinter.Delaborator SubExpr
open Mathlib.Tactic (subscriptTerm)
/-- Notation for vectors in Lp space. `!₂[x, y, ...]` is a shorthand for
`(WithLp.equiv 2 _ _).symm ![x, y, ...]`, of type `EuclideanSpace _ (Fin _)`.
This also works for other subscripts. -/
syntax (name := PiLp.vecNotation) "!" noWs subscriptTerm noWs "[" term,* "]" : term
macro_rules | `(!$p:subscript[$e:term,*]) => do
-- override the `Fin n.succ` to a literal
let n := e.getElems.size
`((WithLp.equiv $p <| ∀ _ : Fin $(quote n), _).symm ![$e,*])
/-- Unexpander for the `!₂[x, y, ...]` notation. -/
@[app_delab DFunLike.coe]
def EuclideanSpace.delabVecNotation : Delab :=
whenNotPPOption getPPExplicit <| whenPPOption getPPNotation <| withOverApp 6 do
-- check that the `(WithLp.equiv _ _).symm` is present
let p : Term ← withAppFn <| withAppArg do
let_expr Equiv.symm _ _ e := ← getExpr | failure
let_expr WithLp.equiv _ _ := e | failure
withNaryArg 2 <| withNaryArg 0 <| delab
-- to be conservative, only allow subscripts which are numerals
guard <| p matches `($_:num)
let `(![$elems,*]) := ← withAppArg delab | failure
`(!$p[$elems,*])
end Notation
theorem EuclideanSpace.nnnorm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : ‖x‖₊ = NNReal.sqrt (∑ i, ‖x i‖₊ ^ 2) :=
PiLp.nnnorm_eq_of_L2 x
theorem EuclideanSpace.norm_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : ‖x‖ = √(∑ i, ‖x i‖ ^ 2) := by
simpa only [Real.coe_sqrt, NNReal.coe_sum] using congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) x.nnnorm_eq
theorem EuclideanSpace.dist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : dist x y = √(∑ i, dist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) :=
PiLp.dist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.nndist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : nndist x y = NNReal.sqrt (∑ i, nndist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) :=
PiLp.nndist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.edist_eq {𝕜 : Type*} [RCLike 𝕜] {n : Type*} [Fintype n]
(x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 n) : edist x y = (∑ i, edist (x i) (y i) ^ 2) ^ (1 / 2 : ℝ) :=
PiLp.edist_eq_of_L2 x y
theorem EuclideanSpace.ball_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.ball (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 < r ^ 2} := by
ext x
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ∑ i, x i ^ 2 := Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sq_nonneg _
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_ball_zero_iff, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, sqrt_lt this hr]
theorem EuclideanSpace.closedBall_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.closedBall (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 ≤ r ^ 2} := by
ext
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_closedBall_zero_iff, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs, sqrt_le_left hr]
theorem EuclideanSpace.sphere_zero_eq {n : Type*} [Fintype n] (r : ℝ) (hr : 0 ≤ r) :
Metric.sphere (0 : EuclideanSpace ℝ n) r = {x | ∑ i, x i ^ 2 = r ^ 2} := by
ext x
have : (0 : ℝ) ≤ ∑ i, x i ^ 2 := Finset.sum_nonneg fun _ _ => sq_nonneg _
simp_rw [mem_setOf, mem_sphere_zero_iff_norm, norm_eq, norm_eq_abs, sq_abs,
Real.sqrt_eq_iff_eq_sq this hr]
section
variable [Fintype ι]
@[simp]
theorem finrank_euclideanSpace :
Module.finrank 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) = Fintype.card ι := by
simp [EuclideanSpace, PiLp, WithLp]
theorem finrank_euclideanSpace_fin {n : ℕ} :
Module.finrank 𝕜 (EuclideanSpace 𝕜 (Fin n)) = n := by simp
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_eq_star_dotProduct (x y : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) :
⟪x, y⟫ = dotProduct (WithLp.equiv _ _ y) (star <| WithLp.equiv _ _ x) :=
rfl
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_piLp_equiv_symm (x y : ι → 𝕜) :
⟪(WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm x, (WithLp.equiv 2 _).symm y⟫ = dotProduct y (star x) :=
rfl
/-- A finite, mutually orthogonal family of subspaces of `E`, which span `E`, induce an isometry
from `E` to `PiLp 2` of the subspaces equipped with the `L2` inner product. -/
def DirectSum.IsInternal.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily [DecidableEq ι] {V : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E}
(hV : DirectSum.IsInternal V)
(hV' : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun i => V i) fun i => (V i).subtypeₗᵢ) :
E ≃ₗᵢ[𝕜] PiLp 2 fun i => V i := by
let e₁ := DirectSum.linearEquivFunOnFintype 𝕜 ι fun i => V i
let e₂ := LinearEquiv.ofBijective (DirectSum.coeLinearMap V) hV
refine LinearEquiv.isometryOfInner (e₂.symm.trans e₁) ?_
suffices ∀ (v w : PiLp 2 fun i => V i), ⟪v, w⟫ = ⟪e₂ (e₁.symm v), e₂ (e₁.symm w)⟫ by
intro v₀ w₀
convert this (e₁ (e₂.symm v₀)) (e₁ (e₂.symm w₀)) <;>
simp only [LinearEquiv.symm_apply_apply, LinearEquiv.apply_symm_apply]
intro v w
trans ⟪∑ i, (V i).subtypeₗᵢ (v i), ∑ i, (V i).subtypeₗᵢ (w i)⟫
· simp only [sum_inner, hV'.inner_right_fintype, PiLp.inner_apply]
· congr <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem DirectSum.IsInternal.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily_symm_apply [DecidableEq ι]
{V : ι → Submodule 𝕜 E} (hV : DirectSum.IsInternal V)
(hV' : OrthogonalFamily 𝕜 (fun i => V i) fun i => (V i).subtypeₗᵢ) (w : PiLp 2 fun i => V i) :
(hV.isometryL2OfOrthogonalFamily hV').symm w = ∑ i, (w i : E) := by
classical
let e₁ := DirectSum.linearEquivFunOnFintype 𝕜 ι fun i => V i
let e₂ := LinearEquiv.ofBijective (DirectSum.coeLinearMap V) hV
suffices ∀ v : ⨁ i, V i, e₂ v = ∑ i, e₁ v i by exact this (e₁.symm w)
intro v
simp [e₁, e₂, DirectSum.coeLinearMap, DirectSum.toModule, DFinsupp.lsum,
DFinsupp.sumAddHom_apply]
end
variable (ι 𝕜)
/-- A shorthand for `PiLp.continuousLinearEquiv`. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace.equiv : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι ≃L[𝕜] ι → 𝕜 :=
PiLp.continuousLinearEquiv 2 𝕜 _
variable {ι 𝕜}
/-- The projection on the `i`-th coordinate of `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`, as a linear map. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace.projₗ (i : ι) : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜 := PiLp.projₗ _ _ i
/-- The projection on the `i`-th coordinate of `EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι`, as a continuous linear map. -/
abbrev EuclideanSpace.proj (i : ι) : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι →L[𝕜] 𝕜 := PiLp.proj _ _ i
section DecEq
variable [DecidableEq ι]
-- TODO : This should be generalized to `PiLp`.
/-- The vector given in euclidean space by being `a : 𝕜` at coordinate `i : ι` and `0 : 𝕜` at
all other coordinates. -/
def EuclideanSpace.single (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι :=
(WithLp.equiv _ _).symm (Pi.single i a)
@[simp]
theorem WithLp.equiv_single (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) :
WithLp.equiv _ _ (EuclideanSpace.single i a) = Pi.single i a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem WithLp.equiv_symm_single (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) :
(WithLp.equiv _ _).symm (Pi.single i a) = EuclideanSpace.single i a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem EuclideanSpace.single_apply (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) (j : ι) :
(EuclideanSpace.single i a) j = ite (j = i) a 0 := by
rw [EuclideanSpace.single, WithLp.equiv_symm_pi_apply, ← Pi.single_apply i a j]
variable [Fintype ι]
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_single_left (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) (v : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) :
⟪EuclideanSpace.single i (a : 𝕜), v⟫ = conj a * v i := by simp [apply_ite conj, mul_comm]
theorem EuclideanSpace.inner_single_right (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) (v : EuclideanSpace 𝕜 ι) :
⟪v, EuclideanSpace.single i (a : 𝕜)⟫ = a * conj (v i) := by simp [apply_ite conj]
@[simp]
theorem EuclideanSpace.norm_single (i : ι) (a : 𝕜) :
‖EuclideanSpace.single i (a : 𝕜)‖ = ‖a‖ :=
| PiLp.norm_equiv_symm_single 2 (fun _ => 𝕜) i a
| Mathlib/Analysis/InnerProductSpace/PiL2.lean | 278 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monoid.Canonical.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Pi
/-!
# Pi instances for ordered groups and monoids
This file defines instances for ordered group, monoid, and related structures on Pi types.
-/
variable {I α β γ : Type*}
-- The indexing type
variable {f : I → Type*}
namespace Pi
/-- The product of a family of ordered commutative monoids is an ordered commutative monoid. -/
@[to_additive
"The product of a family of ordered additive commutative monoids is
an ordered additive commutative monoid."]
instance isOrderedMonoid {ι : Type*} {Z : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CommMonoid (Z i)]
[∀ i, PartialOrder (Z i)] [∀ i, IsOrderedMonoid (Z i)] :
IsOrderedMonoid (∀ i, Z i) where
mul_le_mul_left _ _ w _ := fun i => mul_le_mul_left' (w i) _
@[to_additive]
instance existsMulOfLe {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, LE (α i)] [∀ i, Mul (α i)]
[∀ i, ExistsMulOfLE (α i)] : ExistsMulOfLE (∀ i, α i) :=
⟨fun h =>
⟨fun i => (exists_mul_of_le <| h i).choose,
funext fun i => (exists_mul_of_le <| h i).choose_spec⟩⟩
/-- The product of a family of canonically ordered monoids is a canonically ordered monoid. -/
@[to_additive
"The product of a family of canonically ordered additive monoids is
a canonically ordered additive monoid."]
instance {ι : Type*} {Z : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Monoid (Z i)] [∀ i, PartialOrder (Z i)]
[∀ i, CanonicallyOrderedMul (Z i)] :
CanonicallyOrderedMul (∀ i, Z i) where
__ := Pi.existsMulOfLe
le_self_mul _ _ := fun _ => le_self_mul
@[to_additive]
instance isOrderedCancelMonoid [∀ i, CommMonoid <| f i] [∀ i, PartialOrder <| f i]
[∀ i, IsOrderedCancelMonoid <| f i] :
IsOrderedCancelMonoid (∀ i : I, f i) where
le_of_mul_le_mul_left _ _ _ h i := le_of_mul_le_mul_left' (h i)
instance isOrderedRing [∀ i, Semiring (f i)] [∀ i, PartialOrder (f i)] [∀ i, IsOrderedRing (f i)] :
IsOrderedRing (∀ i, f i) where
add_le_add_left _ _ hab _ := fun _ => add_le_add_left (hab _) _
zero_le_one := fun i => zero_le_one (α := f i)
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left _ _ _ hab hc := fun _ => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hab _) <| hc _
mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right _ _ _ hab hc := fun _ => mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right (hab _) <| hc _
end Pi
namespace Function
section const
variable (β) [One α] [Preorder α] {a : α}
@[to_additive const_nonneg_of_nonneg]
theorem one_le_const_of_one_le (ha : 1 ≤ a) : 1 ≤ const β a := fun _ => ha
@[to_additive]
theorem const_le_one_of_le_one (ha : a ≤ 1) : const β a ≤ 1 := fun _ => ha
variable {β} [Nonempty β]
@[to_additive (attr := simp) const_nonneg]
theorem one_le_const : 1 ≤ const β a ↔ 1 ≤ a :=
const_le_const
@[to_additive (attr := simp) const_pos]
theorem one_lt_const : 1 < const β a ↔ 1 < a :=
const_lt_const
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem const_le_one : const β a ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 :=
const_le_const
@[to_additive (attr := simp) const_neg']
theorem const_lt_one : const β a < 1 ↔ a < 1 :=
const_lt_const
end const
section extend
variable [One γ] [LE γ] {f : α → β} {g : α → γ} {e : β → γ}
@[to_additive extend_nonneg] lemma one_le_extend (hg : 1 ≤ g) (he : 1 ≤ e) : 1 ≤ extend f g e :=
fun _b ↦ by classical exact one_le_dite (fun _ ↦ hg _) (fun _ ↦ he _)
@[to_additive] lemma extend_le_one (hg : g ≤ 1) (he : e ≤ 1) : extend f g e ≤ 1 :=
fun _b ↦ by classical exact dite_le_one (fun _ ↦ hg _) (fun _ ↦ he _)
end extend
end Function
namespace Pi
variable {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [DecidableEq ι] [∀ i, One (α i)] [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {i : ι}
{a b : α i}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulSingle_le_mulSingle : mulSingle i a ≤ mulSingle i b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [mulSingle, update_le_update_iff]
@[to_additive (attr := gcongr)] alias ⟨_, GCongr.mulSingle_mono⟩ := mulSingle_le_mulSingle
@[to_additive (attr := simp) single_nonneg]
lemma one_le_mulSingle : 1 ≤ mulSingle i a ↔ 1 ≤ a := by simp [mulSingle]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
lemma mulSingle_le_one : mulSingle i a ≤ 1 ↔ a ≤ 1 := by simp [mulSingle]
end Pi
-- Porting note: Tactic code not ported yet
-- namespace Tactic
-- open Function
-- variable (ι) [Zero α] {a : α}
-- private theorem function_const_nonneg_of_pos [Preorder α] (ha : 0 < a) : 0 ≤ const ι a :=
-- const_nonneg_of_nonneg _ ha.le
-- variable [Nonempty ι]
-- private theorem function_const_ne_zero : a ≠ 0 → const ι a ≠ 0 :=
-- const_ne_zero.2
-- private theorem function_const_pos [Preorder α] : 0 < a → 0 < const ι a :=
-- const_pos.2
-- /-- Extension for the `positivity` tactic: `Function.const` is positive/nonnegative/nonzero if
-- its input is. -/
-- @[positivity]
-- unsafe def positivity_const : expr → tactic strictness
-- | q(Function.const $(ι) $(a)) => do
| -- let strict_a ← core a
-- match strict_a with
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Pi.lean | 148 | 149 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Basic
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
- `MulAction.index_stabilizer`: the index of the stabilizer is the cardinality of the orbit
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal Function
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number. Returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of an additive subgroup as a natural number.
Returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
/-- If `H` and `K` are subgroups of a group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ` is the index
of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "If `H` and `K` are subgroups of an additive group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ`
is the index of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {f : G' →* G} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.comap f).index = H.index := by
have key : ∀ x y : G',
QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f) x y ↔ QuotientGroup.leftRel H (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap (f : G' →* G) :
(H.comap f).index = H.relindex f.range :=
Eq.trans (congr_arg index (by rfl))
((H.subgroupOf f.range).index_comap_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_comap (f : G' →* G) (K : Subgroup G') :
relindex (comap f H) K = relindex H (map f K) := by
rw [relindex, subgroupOf, comap_comap, index_comap, ← f.map_range, K.range_subtype]
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive relindex_mul_index]
theorem relindex_mul_index (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K * K.index = H.index :=
((mul_comm _ _).trans (Cardinal.toNat_mul _ _).symm).trans
(congr_arg Cardinal.toNat (Equiv.cardinal_eq (quotientEquivProdOfLE h))).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : K.index ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_left_eq (H.relindex K) (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_right_eq K.index (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_subgroupOf (hKL : K ≤ L) :
(H.subgroupOf L).relindex (K.subgroupOf L) = H.relindex K :=
((index_comap (H.subgroupOf L) (inclusion hKL)).trans (congr_arg _ (inclusion_range hKL))).symm
variable (H K L)
@[to_additive relindex_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_mul_relindex (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) :
H.relindex K * K.relindex L = H.relindex L := by
rw [← relindex_subgroupOf hKL]
exact relindex_mul_index fun x hx => hHK hx
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_right : (H ⊓ K).relindex K = H.relindex K := by
rw [relindex, relindex, inf_subgroupOf_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_left : (H ⊓ K).relindex H = K.relindex H := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_relindex_right]
@[to_additive relindex_inf_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_inf_mul_relindex : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) * K.relindex L = (H ⊓ K).relindex L := by
rw [← inf_relindex_right H (K ⊓ L), ← inf_relindex_right K L, ← inf_relindex_right (H ⊓ K) L,
inf_assoc, relindex_mul_relindex (H ⊓ (K ⊓ L)) (K ⊓ L) L inf_le_right inf_le_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_right [K.Normal] : K.relindex (H ⊔ K) = K.relindex H :=
Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient H K).toEquiv.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_left [K.Normal] : K.relindex (K ⊔ H) = K.relindex H := by
rw [sup_comm, relindex_sup_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_normal [H.Normal] : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
relindex_sup_right K H ▸ relindex_dvd_index_of_le le_sup_right
variable {H K}
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_of_le_left (hHK : H ≤ K) : K.relindex L ∣ H.relindex L :=
inf_of_le_left hHK ▸ dvd_of_mul_left_eq _ (relindex_inf_mul_relindex _ _ _)
/-- A subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that for all `b`, exactly one
of `b * a` and `b` belong to `H`. -/
@[to_additive "An additive subgroup has index two if and only if there exists `a` such that
for all `b`, exactly one of `b + a` and `b` belong to `H`."]
theorem index_eq_two_iff : H.index = 2 ↔ ∃ a, ∀ b, Xor' (b * a ∈ H) (b ∈ H) := by
simp only [index, Nat.card_eq_two_iff' ((1 : G) : G ⧸ H), ExistsUnique, inv_mem_iff,
QuotientGroup.exists_mk, QuotientGroup.forall_mk, Ne, QuotientGroup.eq, mul_one,
xor_iff_iff_not]
refine exists_congr fun a =>
⟨fun ha b => ⟨fun hba hb => ?_, fun hb => ?_⟩, fun ha => ⟨?_, fun b hb => ?_⟩⟩
· exact ha.1 ((mul_mem_cancel_left hb).1 hba)
· exact inv_inv b ▸ ha.2 _ (mt (inv_mem_iff (x := b)).1 hb)
· rw [← inv_mem_iff (x := a), ← ha, inv_mul_cancel]
exact one_mem _
· rwa [ha, inv_mem_iff (x := b)]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_mem_iff_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) {a b : G} : a * b ∈ H ↔ (a ∈ H ↔ b ∈ H) := by
by_cases ha : a ∈ H; · simp only [ha, true_iff, mul_mem_cancel_left ha]
by_cases hb : b ∈ H; · simp only [hb, iff_true, mul_mem_cancel_right hb]
simp only [ha, hb, iff_true]
rcases index_eq_two_iff.1 h with ⟨c, hc⟩
refine (hc _).or.resolve_left ?_
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_mem_cancel_right ((hc _).or.resolve_right hb)]
@[to_additive]
theorem mul_self_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a * a ∈ H := by
rw [mul_mem_iff_of_index_two h]
@[to_additive two_smul_mem_of_index_two]
theorem sq_mem_of_index_two (h : H.index = 2) (a : G) : a ^ 2 ∈ H :=
(pow_two a).symm ▸ mul_self_mem_of_index_two h a
variable (H K) {f : G →* G'}
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_top : (⊤ : Subgroup G).index = 1 :=
Nat.card_eq_one_iff_unique.mpr ⟨QuotientGroup.subsingleton_quotient_top, ⟨1⟩⟩
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem index_bot : (⊥ : Subgroup G).index = Nat.card G :=
Cardinal.toNat_congr QuotientGroup.quotientBot.toEquiv
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_left : (⊤ : Subgroup G).relindex H = 1 :=
index_top
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_top_right : H.relindex ⊤ = H.index := by
| rw [← relindex_mul_index (show H ≤ ⊤ from le_top), index_top, mul_one]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_bot_left : (⊥ : Subgroup G).relindex H = Nat.card H := by
rw [relindex, bot_subgroupOf, index_bot]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 197 | 203 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Cover
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Finset.Defs
/-!
# Intervals as finsets
This file provides basic results about all the `Finset.Ixx`, which are defined in
`Order.Interval.Finset.Defs`.
In addition, it shows that in a locally finite order `≤` and `<` are the transitive closures of,
respectively, `⩿` and `⋖`, which then leads to a characterization of monotone and strictly
functions whose domain is a locally finite order. In particular, this file proves:
* `le_iff_transGen_wcovBy`: `≤` is the transitive closure of `⩿`
* `lt_iff_transGen_covBy`: `<` is the transitive closure of `⋖`
* `monotone_iff_forall_wcovBy`: Characterization of monotone functions
* `strictMono_iff_forall_covBy`: Characterization of strictly monotone functions
## TODO
This file was originally only about `Finset.Ico a b` where `a b : ℕ`. No care has yet been taken to
generalize these lemmas properly and many lemmas about `Icc`, `Ioc`, `Ioo` are missing. In general,
what's to do is taking the lemmas in `Data.X.Intervals` and abstract away the concrete structure.
Complete the API. See
https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib/pull/14448#discussion_r906109235
for some ideas.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero Finset.sum
open Function OrderDual
open FinsetInterval
variable {ι α : Type*} {a a₁ a₂ b b₁ b₂ c x : α}
namespace Finset
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α]
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Icc : (Icc a b).Nonempty ↔ a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Icc, Set.nonempty_Icc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Icc_of_le⟩ := nonempty_Icc
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ico : (Ico a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ico, Set.nonempty_Ico]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ico_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ico
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioc : (Ioc a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioc, Set.nonempty_Ioc]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioc_of_lt⟩ := nonempty_Ioc
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem nonempty_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] : (Ioo a b).Nonempty ↔ a < b := by
rw [← coe_nonempty, coe_Ioo, Set.nonempty_Ioo]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_iff : Icc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a ≤ b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_iff : Ico a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ico, Set.Ico_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_iff : Ioc a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioc, Set.Ioc_eq_empty_iff]
-- TODO: This is nonsense. A locally finite order is never densely ordered
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_iff [DenselyOrdered α] : Ioo a b = ∅ ↔ ¬a < b := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioo, Set.Ioo_eq_empty_iff]
alias ⟨_, Icc_eq_empty⟩ := Icc_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ico_eq_empty⟩ := Ico_eq_empty_iff
alias ⟨_, Ioc_eq_empty⟩ := Ioc_eq_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty (h : ¬a < b) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun _ hx => h ((mem_Ioo.1 hx).1.trans (mem_Ioo.1 hx).2)
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_empty_of_lt (h : b < a) : Icc a b = ∅ :=
Icc_eq_empty h.not_le
@[simp]
theorem Ico_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ico a b = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioc a b = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty h.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_eq_empty_of_le (h : b ≤ a) : Ioo a b = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty h.not_lt
theorem left_mem_Icc : a ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, true_and, le_rfl]
theorem left_mem_Ico : a ∈ Ico a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ico, true_and, le_refl]
theorem right_mem_Icc : b ∈ Icc a b ↔ a ≤ b := by simp only [mem_Icc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem right_mem_Ioc : b ∈ Ioc a b ↔ a < b := by simp only [mem_Ioc, and_true, le_rfl]
theorem left_not_mem_Ioc : a ∉ Ioc a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioc.1 h).1
theorem left_not_mem_Ioo : a ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).1
theorem right_not_mem_Ico : b ∉ Ico a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ico.1 h).2
theorem right_not_mem_Ioo : b ∉ Ioo a b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioo.1 h).2
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Icc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ico ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioc ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioo ha hb
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Icc a₂ b ⊆ Icc a₁ b :=
Icc_subset_Icc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ico a₁ b :=
Ico_subset_Ico h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioc a₂ b ⊆ Ioc a₁ b :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ ≤ a₂) : Ioo a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo h le_rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Icc a b₂ :=
Icc_subset_Icc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ico_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ico a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ :=
Ico_subset_Ico le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioc_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioc a b₂ :=
Ioc_subset_Ioc le_rfl h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ ≤ b₂) : Ioo a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ :=
Ioo_subset_Ioo le_rfl h
theorem Ico_subset_Ioo_left (h : a₁ < a₂) : Ico a₂ b ⊆ Ioo a₁ b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Ioo_left h
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioo_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Ioc a b₁ ⊆ Ioo a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Ioo]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Ioo_right h
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_right (h : b₁ < b₂) : Icc a b₁ ⊆ Ico a b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Icc_subset_Ico_right h
theorem Ioo_subset_Ico_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ico_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc]
exact Set.Ioo_subset_Ioc_self
theorem Ico_subset_Icc_self : Ico a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ico, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Icc_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Icc_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Icc a b :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem Icc_subset_Icc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Icc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_subset_Icc_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioo_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioo a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ioo, Set.Icc_subset_Ioo_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ico_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ico a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ ≤ a₁ ∧ b₁ < b₂ := by
rw [← coe_subset, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁]
theorem Icc_subset_Ioc_iff (h₁ : a₁ ≤ b₁) : Icc a₁ b₁ ⊆ Ioc a₂ b₂ ↔ a₂ < a₁ ∧ b₁ ≤ b₂ :=
(Icc_subset_Ico_iff h₁.dual).trans and_comm
--TODO: `Ico_subset_Ioo_iff`, `Ioc_subset_Ioo_iff`
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_left (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ < a₁) (hb : b₁ ≤ b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_left hI ha hb
theorem Icc_ssubset_Icc_right (hI : a₂ ≤ b₂) (ha : a₂ ≤ a₁) (hb : b₁ < b₂) :
Icc a₁ b₁ ⊂ Icc a₂ b₂ := by
rw [← coe_ssubset, coe_Icc, coe_Icc]
exact Set.Icc_ssubset_Icc_right hI ha hb
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_disjoint_Ioc_of_le {d : α} (hbc : b ≤ c) : Disjoint (Ioc a b) (Ioc c d) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ h1 h2 ↦ not_and_of_not_left _
((mem_Ioc.1 h1).2.trans hbc).not_lt (mem_Ioc.1 h2)
variable (a)
theorem Ico_self : Ico a a = ∅ :=
Ico_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioc_self : Ioc a a = ∅ :=
Ioc_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
theorem Ioo_self : Ioo a a = ∅ :=
Ioo_eq_empty <| lt_irrefl _
variable {a}
/-- A set with upper and lower bounds in a locally finite order is a fintype -/
def _root_.Set.fintypeOfMemBounds {s : Set α} [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s)
(hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) : Fintype s :=
Set.fintypeSubset (Set.Icc a b) fun _ hx => ⟨ha hx, hb hx⟩
section Filter
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_left [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1).not_lt
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_right_le [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hbc : b ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.trans_le hbc
theorem Ico_filter_lt_of_le_right [DecidablePred (· < c)] (hcb : c ≤ b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x < c} = Ico a c := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_right_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.2.trans_le hcb
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_le_left {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hca : c ≤ a) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => hca.trans (mem_Ico.1 hx).1
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_right_le {a b : α} [DecidablePred (b ≤ ·)] :
{x ∈ Ico a b | b ≤ x} = ∅ :=
filter_false_of_mem fun _ hx => (mem_Ico.1 hx).2.not_le
theorem Ico_filter_le_of_left_le {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (c ≤ ·)] (hac : a ≤ c) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | c ≤ x} = Ico c b := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_Ico, and_comm, and_left_comm]
exact and_iff_right_of_imp fun h => hac.trans h.1
theorem Icc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Icc a b | x < c} = Icc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Icc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Ioc_filter_lt_of_lt_right {a b c : α} [DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : b < c) :
{x ∈ Ioc a b | x < c} = Ioc a b :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Ioc.1 hx).2 h
theorem Iic_filter_lt_of_lt_right {α} [Preorder α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a c : α}
[DecidablePred (· < c)] (h : a < c) : {x ∈ Iic a | x < c} = Iic a :=
filter_true_of_mem fun _ hx => lt_of_le_of_lt (mem_Iic.1 hx) h
variable (a b) [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_lt_eq_Ioo [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ioo a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_lt_le_eq_Ioc [DecidablePred fun j => a < j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a < j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Ioc a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_lt_eq_Ico [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j < b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j < b} : Finset _) = Ico a b := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_le_eq_Icc [DecidablePred fun j => a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b] :
({j | a ≤ j ∧ j ≤ b} : Finset _) = Icc a b := by ext; simp
end Filter
end LocallyFiniteOrder
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_eq_empty : Ioi a = ∅ ↔ IsMax a := by
rw [← coe_eq_empty, coe_Ioi, Set.Ioi_eq_empty_iff]
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMax.finsetIoi_eq⟩ := Ioi_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Ioi_nonempty : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Ioi_top [OrderTop α] : Ioi (⊤ : α) = ∅ := Ioi_eq_empty.mpr isMax_top
@[simp]
theorem Ici_bot [OrderBot α] [Fintype α] : Ici (⊥ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Ici, bot_le, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Ici : (Ici a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Ici.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Ioi : (Ioi a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMax a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Ioi_of_not_isMax⟩ := nonempty_Ioi
@[simp]
theorem Ici_subset_Ici : Ici a ⊆ Ici b ↔ b ≤ a := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_subset_Ici⟩ := Ici_subset_Ici
@[simp]
theorem Ici_ssubset_Ici : Ici a ⊂ Ici b ↔ b < a := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Ici_ssubset_Ici⟩ := Ici_ssubset_Ici
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_subset_Ioi (h : a ≤ b) : Ioi b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ioi h
@[gcongr]
theorem Ioi_ssubset_Ioi (h : a < b) : Ioi b ⊂ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Ioi_ssubset_Ioi h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Ici_self : Icc a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ico_subset_Ici_self : Ico a b ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ioi_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ioi_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ioi a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Ioi_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Ici_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioc_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Ici_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Ici_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Ici a :=
Ioo_subset_Ico_self.trans Ico_subset_Ici_self
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_eq_empty : Iio a = ∅ ↔ IsMin a := Ioi_eq_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[simp] alias ⟨_, _root_.IsMin.finsetIio_eq⟩ := Iio_eq_empty
@[simp] lemma Iio_nonempty : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
theorem Iio_bot [OrderBot α] : Iio (⊥ : α) = ∅ := Iio_eq_empty.mpr isMin_bot
@[simp]
theorem Iic_top [OrderTop α] [Fintype α] : Iic (⊤ : α) = univ := by
ext a; simp only [mem_Iic, le_top, mem_univ]
@[simp, aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
lemma nonempty_Iic : (Iic a).Nonempty := ⟨a, mem_Iic.2 le_rfl⟩
lemma nonempty_Iio : (Iio a).Nonempty ↔ ¬ IsMin a := by simp [Finset.Nonempty]
@[aesop safe apply (rule_sets := [finsetNonempty])]
alias ⟨_, Aesop.nonempty_Iio_of_not_isMin⟩ := nonempty_Iio
@[simp]
theorem Iic_subset_Iic : Iic a ⊆ Iic b ↔ a ≤ b := by
simp [← coe_subset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_subset_Iic⟩ := Iic_subset_Iic
@[simp]
theorem Iic_ssubset_Iic : Iic a ⊂ Iic b ↔ a < b := by
simp [← coe_ssubset]
@[gcongr]
alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.Finset.Iic_ssubset_Iic⟩ := Iic_ssubset_Iic
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_subset_Iio (h : a ≤ b) : Iio a ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iio h
@[gcongr]
theorem Iio_ssubset_Iio (h : a < b) : Iio a ⊂ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_ssubset] using Set.Iio_ssubset_Iio h
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
theorem Icc_subset_Iic_self : Icc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioc_subset_Iic_self : Ioc a b ⊆ Iic b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iio_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ico_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iio_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iio b := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioo_subset_Iio_self
theorem Ico_subset_Iic_self : Ico a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ico_subset_Icc_self.trans Icc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Ioo_subset_Iic_self : Ioo a b ⊆ Iic b :=
Ioo_subset_Ioc_self.trans Ioc_subset_Iic_self
theorem Iic_disjoint_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint (Iic a) (Ioc b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hax hbcx ↦ (mem_Iic.1 hax).not_lt <| lt_of_le_of_lt h (mem_Ioc.1 hbcx).1
/-- An equivalence between `Finset.Iic a` and `Set.Iic a`. -/
def _root_.Equiv.IicFinsetSet (a : α) : Iic a ≃ Set.Iic a where
toFun b := ⟨b.1, coe_Iic a ▸ mem_coe.2 b.2⟩
invFun b := ⟨b.1, by rw [← mem_coe, coe_Iic a]; exact b.2⟩
left_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
right_inv := fun _ ↦ rfl
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] {a : α}
theorem Ioi_subset_Ici_self : Ioi a ⊆ Ici a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Ioi_subset_Ici_self
theorem _root_.BddBelow.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) : s.Finite :=
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
(Ici a).finite_toSet.subset fun _ hx => mem_Ici.2 <| ha hx
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddBelow {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddBelow s :=
mt BddBelow.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_lt_eq_Ioi [DecidablePred (a < ·)] : ({x | a < x} : Finset _) = Ioi a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_le_eq_Ici [DecidablePred (a ≤ ·)] : ({x | a ≤ x} : Finset _) = Ici a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderTop
section LocallyFiniteOrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α] {a : α}
theorem Iio_subset_Iic_self : Iio a ⊆ Iic a := by
simpa [← coe_subset] using Set.Iio_subset_Iic_self
theorem _root_.BddAbove.finite {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : s.Finite :=
hs.dual.finite
theorem _root_.Set.Infinite.not_bddAbove {s : Set α} : s.Infinite → ¬BddAbove s :=
mt BddAbove.finite
variable [Fintype α]
theorem filter_gt_eq_Iio [DecidablePred (· < a)] : ({x | x < a} : Finset _) = Iio a := by ext; simp
theorem filter_ge_eq_Iic [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] : ({x | x ≤ a} : Finset _) = Iic a := by ext; simp
end LocallyFiniteOrderBot
section LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrder α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_bot [OrderBot α] : Icc (⊥ : α) a = Iic a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Icc_top [OrderTop α] : Icc a (⊤ : α) = Ici a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ico_bot [OrderBot α] : Ico (⊥ : α) a = Iio a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_top [OrderTop α] : Ioc a (⊤ : α) = Ioi a := rfl
theorem Icc_bot_top [BoundedOrder α] [Fintype α] : Icc (⊥ : α) (⊤ : α) = univ := by
rw [Icc_bot, Iic_top]
end LocallyFiniteOrder
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
theorem disjoint_Ioi_Iio (a : α) : Disjoint (Ioi a) (Iio a) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hba => (mem_Ioi.1 hab).not_lt <| mem_Iio.1 hba
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] {a b c : α}
@[simp]
theorem Icc_self (a : α) : Icc a a = {a} := by rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_self]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_eq_singleton_iff : Icc a b = {c} ↔ a = c ∧ b = c := by
rw [← coe_eq_singleton, coe_Icc, Set.Icc_eq_singleton_iff]
theorem Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Disjoint (Ico a b) (Ico b c) :=
disjoint_left.2 fun _ hab hbc => (mem_Ico.mp hab).2.not_le (mem_Ico.mp hbc).1
@[simp]
theorem Ici_top [OrderTop α] : Ici (⊤ : α) = {⊤} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
@[simp]
theorem Iic_bot [OrderBot α] : Iic (⊥ : α) = {⊥} := Icc_eq_singleton_iff.2 ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq α]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_left (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase a = Ioc a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Icc a b).erase b = Ico a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_erase_left (a b : α) : (Ico a b).erase a = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_erase_right (a b : α) : (Ioc a b).erase b = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_both (a b : α) : Icc a b \ {a, b} = Ioo a b := by simp [← coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_insert_right (h : a ≤ b) : insert b (Ico a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Icc, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ico_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_insert_left (h : a ≤ b) : insert a (Ioc a b) = Icc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioc, coe_Icc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioc_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_left (h : a < b) : insert a (Ioo a b) = Ico a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ico, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_left h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioo_insert_right (h : a < b) : insert b (Ioo a b) = Ioc a b := by
rw [← coe_inj, coe_insert, coe_Ioo, coe_Ioc, Set.insert_eq, Set.union_comm, Set.Ioo_union_right h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ico_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ico a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioc_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioc a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Icc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b \ Ioo a b = {a, b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ico a b \ Ioo a b = {a} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ioc_diff_Ioo_self (h : a < b) : Ioc a b \ Ioo a b = {b} := by simp [← coe_inj, h]
@[simp]
theorem Ico_inter_Ico_consecutive (a b c : α) : Ico a b ∩ Ico b c = ∅ :=
(Ico_disjoint_Ico_consecutive a b c).eq_bot
end DecidableEq
-- Those lemmas are purposefully the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ico_insert_right`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ico (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ico a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ico := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ico_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioc_insert_left`. -/
theorem Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (h : a ≤ b) : Icc a b = (Ioc a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioc := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioc_insert_left h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_right`. -/
theorem Ioc_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ioc a b = (Ioo a b).cons b right_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_right h]
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioo_insert_left`. -/
theorem Ico_eq_cons_Ioo (h : a < b) : Ico a b = (Ioo a b).cons a left_not_mem_Ioo := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioo_insert_left h]
theorem Ico_filter_le_left {a b : α} [DecidablePred (· ≤ a)] (hab : a < b) :
{x ∈ Ico a b | x ≤ a} = {a} := by
ext x
rw [mem_filter, mem_Ico, mem_singleton, and_right_comm, ← le_antisymm_iff, eq_comm]
exact and_iff_left_of_imp fun h => h.le.trans_lt hab
theorem card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ico a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a ≤ b
· rw [Icc_eq_cons_Ico h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ico_eq_empty fun h' => h h'.le, Icc_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioc_eq_card_Icc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioc a b) = #(Icc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ico a b) - 1 := by
classical
by_cases h : a < b
· rw [Ico_eq_cons_Ioo h, card_cons]
exact (Nat.add_sub_cancel _ _).symm
· rw [Ioo_eq_empty h, Ico_eq_empty h, card_empty, Nat.zero_sub]
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Ioc_sub_one (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Ioc a b) - 1 :=
@card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
theorem card_Ioo_eq_card_Icc_sub_two (a b : α) : #(Ioo a b) = #(Icc a b) - 2 := by
rw [card_Ioo_eq_card_Ico_sub_one, card_Ico_eq_card_Icc_sub_one]
rfl
end PartialOrder
section Prod
variable {β : Type*}
section sectL
lemma uIcc_map_sectL [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = uIcc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [Preorder α] [PartialOrder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (a b : α) (c : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectL : (Icc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Icc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectL : (Ioc a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioc (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectL : (Ico a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ico (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectL : (Ioo a b).map (.sectL _ c) = Ioo (a, c) (b, c) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectL
section sectR
lemma uIcc_map_sectR [Lattice α] [Lattice β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β) :
(uIcc a b).map (.sectR c _) = uIcc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
variable [PartialOrder α] [Preorder β] [LocallyFiniteOrder α] [LocallyFiniteOrder β]
[DecidableLE (α × β)] (c : α) (a b : β)
lemma Icc_map_sectR : (Icc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Icc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm])
lemma Ioc_map_sectR : (Ioc a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioc (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ico_map_sectR : (Ico a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ico (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
lemma Ioo_map_sectR : (Ioo a b).map (.sectR c _) = Ioo (c, a) (c, b) := by
aesop (add safe forward [le_antisymm, le_of_lt])
end sectR
end Prod
section BoundedPartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α]
section OrderTop
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderTop α]
@[simp]
theorem Ici_erase [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : (Ici a).erase a = Ioi a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm, ne_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Ioi_insert [DecidableEq α] (a : α) : insert a (Ioi a) = Ici a := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Ici, mem_Ioi, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm, eq_comm]
theorem not_mem_Ioi_self {b : α} : b ∉ Ioi b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Ioi.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Ioi_insert`. -/
theorem Ici_eq_cons_Ioi (a : α) : Ici a = (Ioi a).cons a not_mem_Ioi_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Ioi_insert]
theorem card_Ioi_eq_card_Ici_sub_one (a : α) : #(Ioi a) = #(Ici a) - 1 := by
rw [Ici_eq_cons_Ioi, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
@[simp]
theorem Iic_erase [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : (Iic b).erase b = Iio b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_erase, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, lt_iff_le_and_ne, and_comm]
@[simp]
theorem Iio_insert [DecidableEq α] (b : α) : insert b (Iio b) = Iic b := by
ext
simp_rw [Finset.mem_insert, mem_Iic, mem_Iio, le_iff_lt_or_eq, or_comm]
theorem not_mem_Iio_self {b : α} : b ∉ Iio b := fun h => lt_irrefl _ (mem_Iio.1 h)
-- Purposefully written the other way around
/-- `Finset.cons` version of `Finset.Iio_insert`. -/
theorem Iic_eq_cons_Iio (b : α) : Iic b = (Iio b).cons b not_mem_Iio_self := by
classical rw [cons_eq_insert, Iio_insert]
theorem card_Iio_eq_card_Iic_sub_one (a : α) : #(Iio a) = #(Iic a) - 1 := by
rw [Iic_eq_cons_Iio, card_cons, Nat.add_sub_cancel_right]
end OrderBot
end BoundedPartialOrder
section SemilatticeSup
variable [SemilatticeSup α] [LocallyFiniteOrderBot α]
-- TODO: Why does `id_eq` simplify the LHS here but not the LHS of `Finset.sup_Iic`?
lemma sup'_Iic (a : α) : (Iic a).sup' nonempty_Iic id = a :=
le_antisymm (sup'_le _ _ fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup' (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
@[simp] lemma sup_Iic [OrderBot α] (a : α) : (Iic a).sup id = a :=
le_antisymm (Finset.sup_le fun _ ↦ mem_Iic.1) <| le_sup (f := id) <| mem_Iic.2 <| le_refl a
lemma image_subset_Iic_sup [OrderBot α] [DecidableEq α] (f : ι → α) (s : Finset ι) :
s.image f ⊆ Iic (s.sup f) := by
refine fun i hi ↦ mem_Iic.2 ?_
| obtain ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩ := mem_image.1 hi
exact le_sup hj
| Mathlib/Order/Interval/Finset/Basic.lean | 790 | 792 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Riccardo Brasca. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Riccardo Brasca
-/
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Cyclotomic.Discriminant
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Eisenstein.IsIntegral
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Norm.AbsNorm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Prime
/-!
# Ring of integers of `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic fields
We gather results about cyclotomic extensions of `ℚ`. In particular, we compute the ring of
integers of a `p ^ n`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`.
## Main results
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow`: if `K` is a
`p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the integral closure of
`ℤ` in `K`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow`: the integral
closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is `CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`.
* `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.absdiscr_prime_pow` and related results: the absolute discriminant
of cyclotomic fields.
-/
universe u
open Algebra IsCyclotomicExtension Polynomial NumberField
open scoped Cyclotomic Nat
variable {p : ℕ+} {k : ℕ} {K : Type u} [Field K] {ζ : K} [hp : Fact (p : ℕ).Prime]
namespace IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_ne_two' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hk : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ (k + 1) : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ k * ((p - 1) * (k + 1) - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ (k + 1)).pos) hk]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
theorem discr_odd_prime' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = (-1) ^ (((p : ℕ) - 1) / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) - 2) := by
rw [← discr_odd_prime hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat hp.out.pos) hodd]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- The discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1`. Beware that in the cases `p ^ k = 1` and
`p ^ k = 2` the formula uses `1 / 2 = 0` and `0 - 1 = 0`. It is useful only to have a uniform
result. See also `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis =
(-1) ^ ((p ^ k : ℕ).totient / 2) * p ^ ((p : ℕ) ^ (k - 1) * ((p - 1) * k - 1)) := by
rw [← discr_prime_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)]
exact hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm
/-- If `p` is a prime and `IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} K L`, then there are `u : ℤˣ` and
`n : ℕ` such that the discriminant of the power basis given by `ζ - 1` is `u * p ^ n`. Often this is
enough and less cumbersome to use than `IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat.discr_prime_pow'`. -/
theorem discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
∃ (u : ℤˣ) (n : ℕ), discr ℚ (hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ).basis = u * p ^ n := by
rw [hζ.discr_zeta_eq_discr_zeta_sub_one.symm]
exact discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow hζ (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ k).pos)
/-- If `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`, then `(adjoin ℤ {ζ})` is the
integral closure of `ℤ` in `K`. -/
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
refine ⟨Subtype.val_injective, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
swap
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact
IsIntegral.algebraMap
((le_integralClosure_iff_isIntegral.1
(adjoin_le_integralClosure (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos))).isIntegral _)
let B := hζ.subOnePowerBasis ℚ
have hint : IsIntegral ℤ B.gen := (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos).sub isIntegral_one
-- Porting note: the following `letI` was not needed because the locale `cyclotomic` set it
-- as instances.
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.finiteDimensional {p ^ k} ℚ K
have H := discr_mul_isIntegral_mem_adjoin ℚ hint h
obtain ⟨u, n, hun⟩ := discr_prime_pow_eq_unit_mul_pow' hζ
rw [hun] at H
replace H := Subalgebra.smul_mem _ H u.inv
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_mul_assoc, Units.inv_eq_val_inv, zsmul_eq_mul, ← Int.cast_mul,
Units.inv_mul, Int.cast_one, one_mul, smul_def, map_pow] at H
cases k
· haveI : IsCyclotomicExtension {1} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
have : x ∈ (⊥ : Subalgebra ℚ K) := by
rw [singleton_one ℚ K]
exact mem_top
obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := mem_bot.1 this
replace h := (isIntegral_algebraMap_iff (algebraMap ℚ K).injective).1 h
obtain ⟨z, hz⟩ := IsIntegrallyClosed.isIntegral_iff.1 h
rw [← hz, ← IsScalarTower.algebraMap_apply]
exact Subalgebra.algebraMap_mem _ _
· have hmin : (minpoly ℤ B.gen).IsEisensteinAt (Submodule.span ℤ {((p : ℕ) : ℤ)}) := by
have h₁ := minpoly.isIntegrallyClosed_eq_field_fractions' ℚ hint
have h₂ := hζ.minpoly_sub_one_eq_cyclotomic_comp (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (p ^ _).pos)
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen] at h₁
rw [h₁, ← map_cyclotomic_int, show Int.castRingHom ℚ = algebraMap ℤ ℚ by rfl,
show X + 1 = map (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (X + 1) by simp, ← map_comp] at h₂
rw [IsPrimitiveRoot.subOnePowerBasis_gen,
map_injective (algebraMap ℤ ℚ) (algebraMap ℤ ℚ).injective_int h₂]
exact cyclotomic_prime_pow_comp_X_add_one_isEisensteinAt p _
refine
adjoin_le ?_
(mem_adjoin_of_smul_prime_pow_smul_of_minpoly_isEisensteinAt (n := n)
(Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out) hint h (by simpa using H) hmin)
simp only [Set.singleton_subset_iff, SetLike.mem_coe]
exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ _) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)
theorem isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) : IsIntegralClosure (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) ℤ K := by
rw [← pow_one p] at hζ hcycl
exact isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
/-- The integral closure of `ℤ` inside `CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ` is
`CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ`. -/
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing (p ^ k) ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ) := by
have hζ := zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ (CyclotomicField (p ^ k) ℚ)
refine ⟨IsFractionRing.injective _ _, @fun x => ⟨fun h => ⟨⟨x, ?_⟩, rfl⟩, ?_⟩⟩
· obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := (isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ).isIntegral_iff.1 h
refine adjoin_mono ?_ y.2
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
exact hζ.pow_eq_one
· rintro ⟨y, rfl⟩
exact IsIntegral.algebraMap ((IsCyclotomicExtension.integral {p ^ k} ℤ _).isIntegral _)
theorem cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime :
IsIntegralClosure (CyclotomicRing p ℤ ℚ) ℤ (CyclotomicField p ℚ) := by
rw [← pow_one p]
exact cyclotomicRing_isIntegralClosure_of_prime_pow
end IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
section PowerBasis
open IsCyclotomicExtension.Rat
namespace IsPrimitiveRoot
section CharZero
variable [CharZero K]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ k`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
[IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
let _ := isIntegralClosure_adjoin_singleton_of_prime_pow hζ
IsIntegralClosure.equiv ℤ (adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K)) K (𝓞 K)
/-- The ring of integers of a `p ^ k`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance IsCyclotomicExtension.ringOfIntegers [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec (p ^ k) ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p ^ k`
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
(Algebra.adjoin.powerBasis' (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos)).map hζ.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers
/-- Abbreviation to see a primitive root of unity as a member of the ring of integers. -/
abbrev toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : 𝓞 K := ⟨ζ, hζ.isIntegral k.pos⟩
end CharZero
lemma coe_toInteger {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : hζ.toInteger.1 = ζ := rfl
/-- `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` is finite. -/
lemma finite_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hk : 1 < k)
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) : Finite (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) := by
refine Ideal.finiteQuotientOfFreeOfNeBot _ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp only [Ideal.span_singleton_eq_bot, sub_eq_zero, ← Subtype.coe_inj] at h
exact hζ.ne_one hk (RingOfIntegers.ext_iff.1 h)
/-- We have that `𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {ζ - 1}` has cardinality equal to the norm of `ζ - 1`.
See the results below to compute this norm in various cases. -/
lemma card_quotient_toInteger_sub_one [NumberField K] {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
Nat.card (𝓞 K ⧸ Ideal.span {hζ.toInteger - 1}) =
(Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)).natAbs := by
rw [← Submodule.cardQuot_apply, ← Ideal.absNorm_apply, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton]
lemma toInteger_isPrimitiveRoot {k : ℕ+} (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ k) :
IsPrimitiveRoot hζ.toInteger k :=
IsPrimitiveRoot.of_map_of_injective (by exact hζ) RingOfIntegers.coe_injective
variable [CharZero K]
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
Subtype.ext <| show algebraMap _ K hζ.integralPowerBasis.gen = _ by
rw [integralPowerBasis, PowerBasis.map_gen, adjoin.powerBasis'_gen]
simp only [adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers_apply, IsIntegralClosure.algebraMap_lift]
rfl
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338
We name `hcycl` so it can be used as a named argument,
but since https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/5338, this is considered unused,
so we need to disable the linter. -/
set_option linter.unusedVariables false in
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : hζ.integralPowerBasis.dim = φ (p ^ k) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis, ← cyclotomic_eq_minpoly hζ, natDegree_cyclotomic]
/-- The algebra isomorphism `adjoin ℤ {ζ} ≃ₐ[ℤ] (𝓞 K)`, where `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of
unity and `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
@[simps!]
noncomputable def _root_.IsPrimitiveRoot.adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
adjoin ℤ ({ζ} : Set K) ≃ₐ[ℤ] 𝓞 K :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- The ring of integers of a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a cyclotomic extension. -/
instance _root_.IsCyclotomicExtension.ring_of_integers' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] :
IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
let _ := (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoin_isCyclotomicExtension ℤ
IsCyclotomicExtension.equiv _ ℤ _ (zeta_spec p ℚ K).adjoinEquivRingOfIntegers'
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by a primitive root of unity, where `K` is a `p`-th
cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def integralPowerBasis' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by convert hcycl; rw [pow_one]
integralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem integralPowerBasis'_gen [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger :=
integralPowerBasis_gen (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp]
theorem power_basis_int'_dim [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.integralPowerBasis'.dim = φ p := by
rw [integralPowerBasis', integralPowerBasis_dim (hcycl := by rwa [pow_one]) (by rwa [pow_one]),
pow_one]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p ^ k` cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
PowerBasis.ofGenMemAdjoin' hζ.integralPowerBasis (RingOfIntegers.isIntegral _)
(by
simp only [integralPowerBasis_gen, toInteger]
convert Subalgebra.add_mem _ (self_mem_adjoin_singleton ℤ (⟨ζ - 1, _⟩ : 𝓞 K))
(Subalgebra.one_mem _)
· simp
· exact Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (by simp)) (Subalgebra.one_mem _))
@[simp]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ k} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ k)) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen =
⟨ζ - 1, Subalgebra.sub_mem _ (hζ.isIntegral (p ^ k).pos) (Subalgebra.one_mem _)⟩ := by
simp [subOneIntegralPowerBasis]
/-- The integral `PowerBasis` of `𝓞 K` given by `ζ - 1`, where `K` is a `p`-th cyclotomic
extension of `ℚ`. -/
noncomputable def subOneIntegralPowerBasis' [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) : PowerBasis ℤ (𝓞 K) :=
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis (p := p) (k := 1) (ζ := ζ) (by rwa [pow_one])
@[simp, nolint unusedHavesSuffices]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen = hζ.toInteger - 1 :=
-- The `unusedHavesSuffices` linter incorrectly thinks this `have` is unnecessary.
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ 1} ℚ K := by rwa [pow_one]
subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen (by rwa [pow_one])
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `p ≠ 2` and `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ hp.out.one_lt (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
convert Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Polynomial.cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (PNat.pos _)) hodd
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity.
See `zeta_sub_one_prime` for a general statement. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow [IsCyclotomicExtension {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
letI := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {(2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
refine Ideal.prime_of_irreducible_absNorm_span (fun h ↦ ?_) ?_
· apply hζ.pow_ne_one_of_pos_of_lt zero_lt_one (one_lt_pow₀ (by decide) (by simp))
rw [sub_eq_zero] at h
simpa using congrArg (algebraMap _ K) h
rw [Nat.irreducible_iff_prime, Ideal.absNorm_span_singleton, ← Nat.prime_iff,
← Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime]
cases k
· convert Prime.neg Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_neg, map_ofNat]
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one, AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, OneMemClass.coe_one,
pow_zero]
using hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat
(by simp only [zero_add, pow_one, Nat.ofNat_pos]))
convert Int.prime_two
apply RingHom.injective_int (algebraMap ℤ ℚ)
rw [← Algebra.norm_localization (Sₘ := K) ℤ (nonZeroDivisors ℤ)]
simp only [PNat.pow_coe, id.map_eq_id, RingHomCompTriple.comp_eq, RingHom.coe_coe,
Subalgebra.coe_val, algebraMap_int_eq, map_natCast]
exact hζ.norm_sub_one_two Nat.AtLeastTwo.prop (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp))
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p ^ (k + 1)`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) : Prime (hζ.toInteger - 1) := by
by_cases htwo : p = 2
· subst htwo
apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_two_pow
· apply hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime_of_ne_two htwo
/-- `ζ - 1` is prime if `ζ` is a primitive `p`-th root of unity. -/
theorem zeta_sub_one_prime' [h : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K] (hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) :
Prime ((hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
convert zeta_sub_one_prime (k := 0) (by simpa only [zero_add, pow_one])
simpa only [zero_add, pow_one]
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime
theorem subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen_prime [IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) :
Prime hζ.subOneIntegralPowerBasis'.gen := by
simpa only [subOneIntegralPowerBasis'_gen] using hζ.zeta_sub_one_prime'
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (htwo : p ^ (k - s + 1) ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two
(cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (by simp only [PNat.pow_coe, gt_iff_lt, PNat.pos, pow_pos]))
hs htwo]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ 2 ^ k - 1` in a `2 ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `(-2) ^ 2 ^ k`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑((2 : ℕ+) ^ (k + 1))) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ 2 ^ k - 1) = (-2) ^ (2 : ℕ) ^ k := by
have : NumberField K := IsCyclotomicExtension.numberField {2 ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K
rw [Algebra.norm_eq_iff ℤ (Sₘ := K) (Rₘ := ℚ) rfl.le]
simp [hζ.norm_pow_sub_one_two (cyclotomic.irreducible_rat (pow_pos (by decide) _))]
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ ^ p ^ s - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ`
is `p ^ p ^ s` if `s ≤ k` and `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) {s : ℕ} (hs : s ≤ k) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s - 1) = p ^ (p : ℕ) ^ s := by
refine hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two hs (fun h ↦ hodd ?_)
suffices h : (p : ℕ) = 2 from PNat.coe_injective h
apply eq_of_prime_pow_eq hp.out.prime Nat.prime_two.prime (k - s).succ_pos
rw [pow_one]
exact congr_arg Subtype.val h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
`p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
simpa only [pow_zero, pow_one] using
hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two (Nat.zero_le _) hodd
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is `p` if
`p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ p) (h : p ≠ 2) : Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1) = p := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two h
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
a prime if `p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two [IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (htwo : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have := hζ.norm_toInteger_pow_sub_one_of_prime_pow_ne_two (zero_le _) htwo
simp only [pow_zero, pow_one] at this
rw [this]
exact Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is
a prime if `p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have := hζ.norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd
simp only [pow_zero, pow_one] at this
rw [this]
exact Nat.prime_iff_prime_int.1 hp.out
/-- The norm, relative to `ℤ`, of `ζ - 1` in a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ` is a prime if
`p ≠ 2`. -/
lemma prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two' [hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑p) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
Prime (Algebra.norm ℤ (hζ.toInteger - 1)) := by
have : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (0 + 1)} ℚ K := by simpa using hcycl
replace hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ (p ^ (0 + 1)) := by simpa using hζ
exact hζ.prime_norm_toInteger_sub_one_of_prime_ne_two hodd
/-- In a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2`. -/
theorem not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_pow_ne_two
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (htwo : p ^ (k + 1) ≠ 2) :
¬(∃ n : ℤ, (p : 𝓞 K) ∣ (hζ.toInteger - n : 𝓞 K)) := by
intro ⟨n, x, h⟩
-- Let `pB` be the power basis of `𝓞 K` given by powers of `ζ`.
let pB := hζ.integralPowerBasis
have hdim : pB.dim = ↑p ^ k * (↑p - 1) := by
simp [integralPowerBasis_dim, pB, Nat.totient_prime_pow hp.1 (Nat.zero_lt_succ k)]
replace hdim : 1 < pB.dim := by
rw [Nat.one_lt_iff_ne_zero_and_ne_one, hdim]
refine ⟨by simp only [ne_eq, mul_eq_zero, pow_eq_zero_iff', PNat.ne_zero, false_and, false_or,
Nat.sub_eq_zero_iff_le, not_le, Nat.Prime.one_lt hp.out], ne_of_gt ?_⟩
| by_cases hk : k = 0
· simp only [hk, zero_add, pow_one, pow_zero, one_mul, Nat.lt_sub_iff_add_lt,
Nat.reduceAdd] at htwo ⊢
exact htwo.symm.lt_of_le hp.1.two_le
· exact one_lt_mul_of_lt_of_le (one_lt_pow₀ hp.1.one_lt hk)
(have := Nat.Prime.two_le hp.out; by omega)
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add] at h
-- We are assuming that `ζ = n + p * x` for some integer `n` and `x : 𝓞 K`. Looking at the
-- coordinates in the base `pB`, we obtain that `1` is a multiple of `p`, contradiction.
replace h := pB.basis.ext_elem_iff.1 h ⟨1, hdim⟩
have := pB.basis_eq_pow ⟨1, hdim⟩
rw [hζ.integralPowerBasis_gen] at this
simp only [PowerBasis.coe_basis, pow_one] at this
rw [← this, show pB.gen = pB.gen ^ (⟨1, hdim⟩ : Fin pB.dim).1 by simp, ← pB.basis_eq_pow,
pB.basis.repr_self_apply] at h
simp only [↓reduceIte, map_add, Finsupp.coe_add, Pi.add_apply] at h
rw [show (p : 𝓞 K) * x = (p : ℤ) • x by simp, ← pB.basis.coord_apply,
LinearMap.map_smul, ← zsmul_one, ← pB.basis.coord_apply, LinearMap.map_smul,
show 1 = pB.gen ^ (⟨0, by omega⟩ : Fin pB.dim).1 by simp, ← pB.basis_eq_pow,
pB.basis.coord_apply, pB.basis.coord_apply, pB.basis.repr_self_apply] at h
simp only [smul_eq_mul, Fin.mk.injEq, zero_ne_one, ↓reduceIte, mul_zero, add_zero] at h
exact (Int.prime_iff_natAbs_prime.2 (by simp [hp.1])).not_dvd_one ⟨_, h⟩
/-- In a `p ^ (k + 1)`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
theorem not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_ne_two
[hcycl : IsCyclotomicExtension {p ^ (k + 1)} ℚ K]
(hζ : IsPrimitiveRoot ζ ↑(p ^ (k + 1))) (hodd : p ≠ 2) :
¬(∃ n : ℤ, (p : 𝓞 K) ∣ (hζ.toInteger - n : 𝓞 K)) := by
refine not_exists_int_prime_dvd_sub_of_prime_pow_ne_two hζ (fun h ↦ ?_)
simp_all only [(@Nat.Prime.pow_eq_iff 2 p (k+1) Nat.prime_two).mp (by assumption_mod_cast),
pow_one, ne_eq]
/-- In a `p`-th cyclotomic extension of `ℚ `, we have that `ζ` is not congruent to an
integer modulo `p` if `p ≠ 2`. -/
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/Cyclotomic/Rat.lean | 451 | 485 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Topology.Separation.Regular
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Basic
/-!
# Hausdorff properties of uniform spaces. Separation quotient.
Two points of a topological space are called `Inseparable`,
if their neighborhoods filter are equal.
Equivalently, `Inseparable x y` means that any open set that contains `x` must contain `y`
and vice versa.
In a uniform space, points `x` and `y` are inseparable
if and only if `(x, y)` belongs to all entourages,
see `inseparable_iff_ker_uniformity`.
A uniform space is a regular topological space,
hence separation axioms `T0Space`, `T1Space`, `T2Space`, and `T3Space`
are equivalent for uniform spaces,
and Lean typeclass search can automatically convert from one assumption to another.
We say that a uniform space is *separated*, if it satisfies these axioms.
If you need an `Iff` statement (e.g., to rewrite),
then see `R1Space.t0Space_iff_t2Space` and `RegularSpace.t0Space_iff_t3Space`.
In this file we prove several facts
that relate `Inseparable` and `Specializes` to the uniformity filter.
Most of them are simple corollaries of `Filter.HasBasis.inseparable_iff_uniformity`
for different filter bases of `𝓤 α`.
Then we study the Kolmogorov quotient `SeparationQuotient X` of a uniform space.
For a general topological space,
this quotient is defined as the quotient by `Inseparable` equivalence relation.
It is the maximal T₀ quotient of a topological space.
In case of a uniform space, we equip this quotient with a `UniformSpace` structure
that agrees with the quotient topology.
We also prove that the quotient map induces uniformity on the original space.
Finally, we turn `SeparationQuotient` into a functor
(not in terms of `CategoryTheory.Functor` to avoid extra imports)
by defining `SeparationQuotient.lift'` and `SeparationQuotient.map` operations.
## Main definitions
* `SeparationQuotient.instUniformSpace`: uniform space structure on `SeparationQuotient α`,
where `α` is a uniform space;
* `SeparationQuotient.lift'`: given a map `f : α → β`
from a uniform space to a separated uniform space,
lift it to a map `SeparationQuotient α → β`;
if the original map is not uniformly continuous, then returns a constant map.
* `SeparationQuotient.map`: given a map `f : α → β` between uniform spaces,
returns a map `SeparationQuotient α → SeparationQuotient β`.
If the original map is not uniformly continuous, then returns a constant map.
Otherwise, `SeparationQuotient.map f (SeparationQuotient.mk x) = SeparationQuotient.mk (f x)`.
## Main results
* `SeparationQuotient.uniformity_eq`: the uniformity filter on `SeparationQuotient α`
is the push forward of the uniformity filter on `α`.
* `SeparationQuotient.comap_mk_uniformity`: the quotient map `α → SeparationQuotient α`
induces uniform space structure on the original space.
* `SeparationQuotient.uniformContinuous_lift'`: factoring a uniformly continuous map through the
separation quotient gives a uniformly continuous map.
* `SeparationQuotient.uniformContinuous_map`: maps induced between separation quotients are
uniformly continuous.
## Implementation notes
This files used to contain definitions of `separationRel α` and `UniformSpace.SeparationQuotient α`.
These definitions were equal (but not definitionally equal)
to `{x : α × α | Inseparable x.1 x.2}` and `SeparationQuotient α`, respectively,
and were added to the library before their geneeralizations to topological spaces.
In https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10644, we migrated from these definitions
to more general `Inseparable` and `SeparationQuotient`.
## TODO
Definitions `SeparationQuotient.lift'` and `SeparationQuotient.map`
rely on `UniformSpace` structures in the domain and in the codomain.
We should generalize them to topological spaces.
This generalization will drop `UniformContinuous` assumptions in some lemmas,
and add these assumptions in other lemmas,
so it was not done in https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/pull/10644 to keep it reasonably sized.
## Keywords
uniform space, separated space, Hausdorff space, separation quotient
-/
open Filter Set Function Topology Uniformity UniformSpace
noncomputable section
universe u v w
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w}
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
/-!
### Separated uniform spaces
-/
instance (priority := 100) UniformSpace.to_regularSpace : RegularSpace α :=
.of_hasBasis
(fun _ ↦ nhds_basis_uniformity' uniformity_hasBasis_closed)
fun a _V hV ↦ isClosed_ball a hV.2
theorem Filter.HasBasis.specializes_iff_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {x y : α} : x ⤳ y ↔ ∀ i, p i → (x, y) ∈ s i :=
(nhds_basis_uniformity h).specializes_iff
theorem Filter.HasBasis.inseparable_iff_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {x y : α} : Inseparable x y ↔ ∀ i, p i → (x, y) ∈ s i :=
specializes_iff_inseparable.symm.trans h.specializes_iff_uniformity
theorem inseparable_iff_ker_uniformity {x y : α} : Inseparable x y ↔ (x, y) ∈ (𝓤 α).ker :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.inseparable_iff_uniformity
protected theorem Inseparable.nhds_le_uniformity {x y : α} (h : Inseparable x y) :
𝓝 (x, y) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
rw [h.prod rfl]
apply nhds_le_uniformity
theorem inseparable_iff_clusterPt_uniformity {x y : α} :
Inseparable x y ↔ ClusterPt (x, y) (𝓤 α) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ .of_nhds_le h.nhds_le_uniformity, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
simp_rw [uniformity_hasBasis_closed.inseparable_iff_uniformity, isClosed_iff_clusterPt]
exact fun U ⟨hU, hUc⟩ ↦ hUc _ <| h.mono <| le_principal_iff.2 hU
|
theorem t0Space_iff_uniformity :
T0Space α ↔ ∀ x y, (∀ r ∈ 𝓤 α, (x, y) ∈ r) → x = y := by
simp only [t0Space_iff_inseparable, inseparable_iff_ker_uniformity, mem_ker, id]
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Separation.lean | 137 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Bhavik Mehta, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Subobject.MonoOver
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Skeletal
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ConcreteCategory.Basic
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Limits.Shapes.Pullback.CommSq
import Mathlib.Tactic.ApplyFun
import Mathlib.Tactic.CategoryTheory.Elementwise
/-!
# Subobjects
We define `Subobject X` as the quotient (by isomorphisms) of
`MonoOver X := {f : Over X // Mono f.hom}`.
Here `MonoOver X` is a thin category (a pair of objects has at most one morphism between them),
so we can think of it as a preorder. However as it is not skeletal, it is not a partial order.
There is a coercion from `Subobject X` back to the ambient category `C`
(using choice to pick a representative), and for `P : Subobject X`,
`P.arrow : (P : C) ⟶ X` is the inclusion morphism.
We provide
* `def pullback [HasPullbacks C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X`
* `def map (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
* `def «exists_» [HasImages C] (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`
and prove their basic properties and relationships.
These are all easy consequences of the earlier development
of the corresponding functors for `MonoOver`.
The subobjects of `X` form a preorder making them into a category. We have `X ≤ Y` if and only if
`X.arrow` factors through `Y.arrow`: see `ofLE`/`ofLEMk`/`ofMkLE`/`ofMkLEMk` and
`le_of_comm`. Similarly, to show that two subobjects are equal, we can supply an isomorphism between
the underlying objects that commutes with the arrows (`eq_of_comm`).
See also
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.factorThru` :
an API describing factorization of morphisms through subobjects.
* `CategoryTheory.Subobject.lattice` :
the lattice structures on subobjects.
## Notes
This development originally appeared in Bhavik Mehta's "Topos theory for Lean" repository,
and was ported to mathlib by Kim Morrison.
### Implementation note
Currently we describe `pullback`, `map`, etc., as functors.
It may be better to just say that they are monotone functions,
and even avoid using categorical language entirely when describing `Subobject X`.
(It's worth keeping this in mind in future use; it should be a relatively easy change here
if it looks preferable.)
### Relation to pseudoelements
There is a separate development of pseudoelements in `CategoryTheory.Abelian.Pseudoelements`,
as a quotient (but not by isomorphism) of `Over X`.
When a morphism `f` has an image, the image represents the same pseudoelement.
In a category with images `Pseudoelements X` could be constructed as a quotient of `MonoOver X`.
In fact, in an abelian category (I'm not sure in what generality beyond that),
`Pseudoelements X` agrees with `Subobject X`, but we haven't developed this in mathlib yet.
-/
universe v₁ v₂ u₁ u₂
noncomputable section
namespace CategoryTheory
open CategoryTheory CategoryTheory.Category CategoryTheory.Limits
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C] {X Y Z : C}
variable {D : Type u₂} [Category.{v₂} D]
/-!
We now construct the subobject lattice for `X : C`,
as the quotient by isomorphisms of `MonoOver X`.
Since `MonoOver X` is a thin category, we use `ThinSkeleton` to take the quotient.
Essentially all the structure defined above on `MonoOver X` descends to `Subobject X`,
with morphisms becoming inequalities, and isomorphisms becoming equations.
-/
/-- The category of subobjects of `X : C`, defined as isomorphism classes of monomorphisms into `X`.
-/
def Subobject (X : C) :=
ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X)
instance (X : C) : PartialOrder (Subobject X) :=
inferInstanceAs <| PartialOrder (ThinSkeleton (MonoOver X))
namespace Subobject
-- Porting note: made it a def rather than an abbreviation
-- because Lean would make it too transparent
/-- Convenience constructor for a subobject. -/
def mk {X A : C} (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject X :=
(toThinSkeleton _).obj (MonoOver.mk' f)
section
attribute [local ext] CategoryTheory.Comma
protected theorem ind {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], p (Subobject.mk f)) (P : Subobject X) : p P := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn'
intro a
exact h a.arrow
protected theorem ind₂ {X : C} (p : Subobject X → Subobject X → Prop)
(h : ∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g],
p (Subobject.mk f) (Subobject.mk g))
(P Q : Subobject X) : p P Q := by
apply Quotient.inductionOn₂'
intro a b
exact h a.arrow b.arrow
end
/-- Declare a function on subobjects of `X` by specifying a function on monomorphisms with
codomain `X`. -/
protected def lift {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α)
(h :
∀ ⦃A B : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) (g : B ⟶ X) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A ≅ B),
i.hom ≫ g = f → F f = F g) :
Subobject X → α := fun P =>
Quotient.liftOn' P (fun m => F m.arrow) fun m n ⟨i⟩ =>
h m.arrow n.arrow ((MonoOver.forget X ⋙ Over.forget X).mapIso i) (Over.w i.hom)
@[simp]
protected theorem lift_mk {α : Sort*} {X : C} (F : ∀ ⦃A : C⦄ (f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f], α) {h A}
(f : A ⟶ X) [Mono f] : Subobject.lift F h (Subobject.mk f) = F f :=
rfl
/-- The category of subobjects is equivalent to the `MonoOver` category. It is more convenient to
use the former due to the partial order instance, but oftentimes it is easier to define structures
on the latter. -/
noncomputable def equivMonoOver (X : C) : Subobject X ≌ MonoOver X :=
ThinSkeleton.equivalence _
/-- Use choice to pick a representative `MonoOver X` for each `Subobject X`.
-/
noncomputable def representative {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ MonoOver X :=
(equivMonoOver X).functor
instance : (representative (X := X)).IsEquivalence :=
(equivMonoOver X).isEquivalence_functor
/-- Starting with `A : MonoOver X`, we can take its equivalence class in `Subobject X`
then pick an arbitrary representative using `representative.obj`.
This is isomorphic (in `MonoOver X`) to the original `A`.
-/
noncomputable def representativeIso {X : C} (A : MonoOver X) :
representative.obj ((toThinSkeleton _).obj A) ≅ A :=
(equivMonoOver X).counitIso.app A
/-- Use choice to pick a representative underlying object in `C` for any `Subobject X`.
Prefer to use the coercion `P : C` rather than explicitly writing `underlying.obj P`.
-/
noncomputable def underlying {X : C} : Subobject X ⥤ C :=
representative ⋙ MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _
instance : CoeOut (Subobject X) C where coe Y := underlying.obj Y
-- Porting note: removed as it has become a syntactic tautology
-- @[simp]
-- theorem underlying_as_coe {X : C} (P : Subobject X) : underlying.obj P = P :=
-- rfl
/-- If we construct a `Subobject Y` from an explicit `f : X ⟶ Y` with `[Mono f]`,
then pick an arbitrary choice of underlying object `(Subobject.mk f : C)` back in `C`,
it is isomorphic (in `C`) to the original `X`.
-/
noncomputable def underlyingIso {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] : (Subobject.mk f : C) ≅ X :=
(MonoOver.forget _ ⋙ Over.forget _).mapIso (representativeIso (MonoOver.mk' f))
/-- The morphism in `C` from the arbitrarily chosen underlying object to the ambient object.
-/
noncomputable def arrow {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : (Y : C) ⟶ X :=
(representative.obj Y).obj.hom
instance arrow_mono {X : C} (Y : Subobject X) : Mono Y.arrow :=
(representative.obj Y).property
@[simp]
theorem arrow_congr {A : C} (X Y : Subobject A) (h : X = Y) :
eqToHom (congr_arg (fun X : Subobject A => (X : C)) h) ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow := by
induction h
simp
@[simp]
theorem representative_coe (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y : C) = (Y : C) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem representative_arrow (Y : Subobject X) : (representative.obj Y).arrow = Y.arrow :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlying_arrow {X : C} {Y Z : Subobject X} (f : Y ⟶ Z) :
underlying.map f ≫ arrow Z = arrow Y :=
Over.w (representative.map f)
@[reassoc (attr := simp), elementwise (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_arrow {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ (Subobject.mk f).arrow = f :=
Over.w _
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem underlyingIso_hom_comp_eq_mk {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) [Mono f] :
(underlyingIso f).hom ≫ f = (mk f).arrow :=
(Iso.eq_inv_comp _).1 (underlyingIso_arrow f).symm
/-- Two morphisms into a subobject are equal exactly if
the morphisms into the ambient object are equal -/
@[ext]
theorem eq_of_comp_arrow_eq {X Y : C} {P : Subobject Y} {f g : X ⟶ P}
(h : f ≫ P.arrow = g ≫ P.arrow) : f = g :=
(cancel_mono P.arrow).mp h
theorem mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂] (g : A₁ ⟶ A₂)
(w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) : mk f₁ ≤ mk f₂ :=
⟨MonoOver.homMk _ w⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_arrow (P : Subobject X) : mk P.arrow = P :=
Quotient.inductionOn' P fun Q => by
obtain ⟨e⟩ := @Quotient.mk_out' _ (isIsomorphicSetoid _) Q
exact Quotient.sound' ⟨MonoOver.isoMk (Iso.refl _) ≪≫ e⟩
theorem le_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C)) (w : f ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) :
X ≤ Y := by
convert mk_le_mk_of_comm _ w <;> simp
theorem le_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : (X : C) ⟶ A)
(w : g ≫ f = X.arrow) : X ≤ mk f :=
le_of_comm (g ≫ (underlyingIso f).inv) <| by simp [w]
theorem mk_le_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (g : A ⟶ (X : C))
(w : g ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f ≤ X :=
le_of_comm ((underlyingIso f).hom ≫ g) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
@[ext (iff := false)]
theorem eq_of_comm {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (f : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C))
(w : f.hom ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow) : X = Y :=
le_antisymm (le_of_comm f.hom w) <| le_of_comm f.inv <| f.inv_comp_eq.2 w.symm
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem eq_mk_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : (X : C) ≅ A)
(w : i.hom ≫ f = X.arrow) : X = mk f :=
eq_of_comm (i.trans (underlyingIso f).symm) <| by simp [w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_of_comm {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (i : A ≅ (X : C))
(w : i.hom ≫ X.arrow = f) : mk f = X :=
Eq.symm <| eq_mk_of_comm _ i.symm <| by rw [Iso.symm_hom, Iso.inv_comp_eq, w]
/-- To show that two subobjects are equal, it suffices to exhibit an isomorphism commuting with
the arrows. -/
theorem mk_eq_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (i : A₁ ≅ A₂)
(w : i.hom ≫ g = f) : mk f = mk g :=
eq_mk_of_comm _ ((underlyingIso f).trans i) <| by simp [w]
lemma mk_surjective {X : C} (S : Subobject X) :
∃ (A : C) (i : A ⟶ X) (_ : Mono i), S = Subobject.mk i :=
⟨_, S.arrow, inferInstance, by simp⟩
-- We make `X` and `Y` explicit arguments here so that when `ofLE` appears in goal statements
-- it is possible to see its source and target
-- (`h` will just display as `_`, because it is in `Prop`).
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofLE {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : (X : C) ⟶ (Y : C) :=
underlying.map <| h.hom
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_arrow {B : C} {X Y : Subobject B} (h : X ≤ Y) : ofLE X Y h ≫ Y.arrow = X.arrow :=
underlying_arrow _
instance {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X ≤ Y) : Mono (ofLE X Y h) := by
fconstructor
intro Z f g w
replace w := w =≫ Y.arrow
ext
simpa using w
theorem ofLE_mk_le_mk_of_comm {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f₁ : A₁ ⟶ B} {f₂ : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f₁] [Mono f₂]
(g : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (w : g ≫ f₂ = f₁) :
ofLE _ _ (mk_le_mk_of_comm g w) = (underlyingIso _).hom ≫ g ≫ (underlyingIso _).inv := by
ext
simp [w]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofLEMk {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) : (X : C) ⟶ A :=
ofLE X (mk f) h ≫ (underlyingIso f).hom
instance {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
Mono (ofLEMk X f h) := by
dsimp only [ofLEMk]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofLEMk_comp {B A : C} {X : Subobject B} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] (h : X ≤ mk f) :
ofLEMk X f h ≫ f = X.arrow := by simp [ofLEMk]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofMkLE {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) : A ⟶ (X : C) :=
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ ofLE (mk f) X h
instance {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f ≤ X) :
Mono (ofMkLE f X h) := by
dsimp only [ofMkLE]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofMkLE_arrow {B A : C} {f : A ⟶ B} [Mono f] {X : Subobject B} (h : mk f ≤ X) :
ofMkLE f X h ≫ X.arrow = f := by simp [ofMkLE]
/-- An inequality of subobjects is witnessed by some morphism between the corresponding objects. -/
def ofMkLEMk {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
A₁ ⟶ A₂ :=
(underlyingIso f).inv ≫ ofLE (mk f) (mk g) h ≫ (underlyingIso g).hom
instance {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
Mono (ofMkLEMk f g h) := by
dsimp only [ofMkLEMk]
infer_instance
@[simp]
theorem ofMkLEMk_comp {B A₁ A₂ : C} {f : A₁ ⟶ B} {g : A₂ ⟶ B} [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f ≤ mk g) :
ofMkLEMk f g h ≫ g = f := by simp [ofMkLEMk]
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLE {B : C} (X Y Z : Subobject B) (h₁ : X ≤ Y) (h₂ : Y ≤ Z) :
ofLE X Y h₁ ≫ ofLE Y Z h₂ = ofLE X Z (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp underlying]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLE_comp_ofLEMk {B A : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h₁ : X ≤ Y)
(h₂ : Y ≤ mk f) : ofLE X Y h₁ ≫ ofLEMk Y f h₂ = ofLEMk X f (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc underlying]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLEMk_comp_ofMkLE {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (Y : Subobject B)
(h₁ : X ≤ mk f) (h₂ : mk f ≤ Y) : ofLEMk X f h₁ ≫ ofMkLE f Y h₂ = ofLE X Y (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ← Functor.map_comp underlying, assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofLEMk_comp_ofMkLEMk {B A₁ A₂ : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] (g : A₂ ⟶ B)
[Mono g] (h₁ : X ≤ mk f) (h₂ : mk f ≤ mk g) :
ofLEMk X f h₁ ≫ ofMkLEMk f g h₂ = ofLEMk X g (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ofMkLEMk, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc underlying,
assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMkLE_comp_ofLE {B A₁ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X Y : Subobject B) (h₁ : mk f ≤ X)
(h₂ : X ≤ Y) : ofMkLE f X h₁ ≫ ofLE X Y h₂ = ofMkLE f Y (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ofMkLEMk, ← Functor.map_comp underlying,
assoc]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMkLE_comp_ofLEMk {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B)
[Mono g] (h₁ : mk f ≤ X) (h₂ : X ≤ mk g) :
ofMkLE f X h₁ ≫ ofLEMk X g h₂ = ofMkLEMk f g (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ofMkLEMk, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc underlying, assoc]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMkLEMk_comp_ofMkLE {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono g]
(X : Subobject B) (h₁ : mk f ≤ mk g) (h₂ : mk g ≤ X) :
ofMkLEMk f g h₁ ≫ ofMkLE g X h₂ = ofMkLE f X (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ofMkLEMk, ← Functor.map_comp underlying,
assoc, Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
congr 1
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem ofMkLEMk_comp_ofMkLEMk {B A₁ A₂ A₃ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono g]
(h : A₃ ⟶ B) [Mono h] (h₁ : mk f ≤ mk g) (h₂ : mk g ≤ mk h) :
ofMkLEMk f g h₁ ≫ ofMkLEMk g h h₂ = ofMkLEMk f h (h₁.trans h₂) := by
simp only [ofMkLE, ofLEMk, ofLE, ofMkLEMk, ← Functor.map_comp_assoc underlying, assoc,
Iso.hom_inv_id_assoc]
congr 1
@[simp]
theorem ofLE_refl {B : C} (X : Subobject B) : ofLE X X le_rfl = 𝟙 _ := by
apply (cancel_mono X.arrow).mp
simp
@[simp]
theorem ofMkLEMk_refl {B A₁ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) [Mono f] : ofMkLEMk f f le_rfl = 𝟙 _ := by
apply (cancel_mono f).mp
simp
-- As with `ofLE`, we have `X` and `Y` as explicit arguments for readability.
/-- An equality of subobjects gives an isomorphism of the corresponding objects.
(One could use `underlying.mapIso (eqToIso h))` here, but this is more readable.) -/
@[simps]
def isoOfEq {B : C} (X Y : Subobject B) (h : X = Y) : (X : C) ≅ (Y : C) where
hom := ofLE _ _ h.le
inv := ofLE _ _ h.ge
/-- An equality of subobjects gives an isomorphism of the corresponding objects. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfEqMk {B A : C} (X : Subobject B) (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (h : X = mk f) : (X : C) ≅ A where
hom := ofLEMk X f h.le
inv := ofMkLE f X h.ge
/-- An equality of subobjects gives an isomorphism of the corresponding objects. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfMkEq {B A : C} (f : A ⟶ B) [Mono f] (X : Subobject B) (h : mk f = X) : A ≅ (X : C) where
hom := ofMkLE f X h.le
inv := ofLEMk X f h.ge
/-- An equality of subobjects gives an isomorphism of the corresponding objects. -/
@[simps]
def isoOfMkEqMk {B A₁ A₂ : C} (f : A₁ ⟶ B) (g : A₂ ⟶ B) [Mono f] [Mono g] (h : mk f = mk g) :
A₁ ≅ A₂ where
hom := ofMkLEMk f g h.le
inv := ofMkLEMk g f h.ge
lemma mk_lt_mk_of_comm {X A₁ A₂ : C} {i₁ : A₁ ⟶ X} {i₂ : A₂ ⟶ X} [Mono i₁] [Mono i₂]
(f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (fac : f ≫ i₂ = i₁) (hf : ¬ IsIso f) :
Subobject.mk i₁ < Subobject.mk i₂ := by
obtain _ | h := (mk_le_mk_of_comm _ fac).lt_or_eq
· assumption
· exfalso
apply hf
convert (isoOfMkEqMk i₁ i₂ h).isIso_hom
rw [← cancel_mono i₂, isoOfMkEqMk_hom, ofMkLEMk_comp, fac]
lemma mk_lt_mk_iff_of_comm {X A₁ A₂ : C} {i₁ : A₁ ⟶ X} {i₂ : A₂ ⟶ X} [Mono i₁] [Mono i₂]
(f : A₁ ⟶ A₂) (fac : f ≫ i₂ = i₁) :
Subobject.mk i₁ < Subobject.mk i₂ ↔ ¬ IsIso f :=
⟨fun h hf ↦ by simp only [mk_eq_mk_of_comm i₁ i₂ (asIso f) fac, lt_self_iff_false] at h,
mk_lt_mk_of_comm f fac⟩
end Subobject
namespace MonoOver
variable {P Q : MonoOver X} (f : P ⟶ Q)
include f in
lemma subobjectMk_le_mk_of_hom :
Subobject.mk P.obj.hom ≤ Subobject.mk Q.obj.hom :=
Subobject.mk_le_mk_of_comm f.left (by simp)
lemma isIso_left_iff_subobjectMk_eq :
IsIso f.left ↔ Subobject.mk P.1.hom = Subobject.mk Q.1.hom :=
⟨fun _ ↦ Subobject.mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ (asIso f.left) (by simp),
fun h ↦ ⟨Subobject.ofMkLEMk _ _ h.symm.le, by simp [← cancel_mono P.1.hom],
by simp [← cancel_mono Q.1.hom]⟩⟩
lemma isIso_iff_subobjectMk_eq :
IsIso f ↔ Subobject.mk P.1.hom = Subobject.mk Q.1.hom := by
rw [isIso_iff_isIso_left, isIso_left_iff_subobjectMk_eq]
end MonoOver
open CategoryTheory.Limits
namespace Subobject
/-- Any functor `MonoOver X ⥤ MonoOver Y` descends to a functor
`Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y`, because `MonoOver Y` is thin. -/
def lower {Y : D} (F : MonoOver X ⥤ MonoOver Y) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y :=
ThinSkeleton.map F
/-- Isomorphic functors become equal when lowered to `Subobject`.
(It's not as evil as usual to talk about equality between functors
because the categories are thin and skeletal.) -/
theorem lower_iso (F₁ F₂ : MonoOver X ⥤ MonoOver Y) (h : F₁ ≅ F₂) : lower F₁ = lower F₂ :=
ThinSkeleton.map_iso_eq h
/-- A ternary version of `Subobject.lower`. -/
def lower₂ (F : MonoOver X ⥤ MonoOver Y ⥤ MonoOver Z) : Subobject X ⥤ Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject Z :=
ThinSkeleton.map₂ F
@[simp]
theorem lower_comm (F : MonoOver Y ⥤ MonoOver X) :
toThinSkeleton _ ⋙ lower F = F ⋙ toThinSkeleton _ :=
rfl
/-- An adjunction between `MonoOver A` and `MonoOver B` gives an adjunction
between `Subobject A` and `Subobject B`. -/
def lowerAdjunction {A : C} {B : D} {L : MonoOver A ⥤ MonoOver B} {R : MonoOver B ⥤ MonoOver A}
(h : L ⊣ R) : lower L ⊣ lower R :=
ThinSkeleton.lowerAdjunction _ _ h
/-- An equivalence between `MonoOver A` and `MonoOver B` gives an equivalence
between `Subobject A` and `Subobject B`. -/
@[simps]
def lowerEquivalence {A : C} {B : D} (e : MonoOver A ≌ MonoOver B) : Subobject A ≌ Subobject B where
functor := lower e.functor
inverse := lower e.inverse
unitIso := by
apply eqToIso
convert ThinSkeleton.map_iso_eq e.unitIso
· exact ThinSkeleton.map_id_eq.symm
· exact (ThinSkeleton.map_comp_eq _ _).symm
counitIso := by
apply eqToIso
convert ThinSkeleton.map_iso_eq e.counitIso
· exact (ThinSkeleton.map_comp_eq _ _).symm
· exact ThinSkeleton.map_id_eq.symm
section Pullback
variable [HasPullbacks C]
/-- When `C` has pullbacks, a morphism `f : X ⟶ Y` induces a functor `Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X`,
by pulling back a monomorphism along `f`. -/
def pullback (f : X ⟶ Y) : Subobject Y ⥤ Subobject X :=
lower (MonoOver.pullback f)
theorem pullback_id (x : Subobject X) : (pullback (𝟙 X)).obj x = x := by
induction' x using Quotient.inductionOn' with f
exact Quotient.sound ⟨MonoOver.pullbackId.app f⟩
theorem pullback_comp (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (x : Subobject Z) :
(pullback (f ≫ g)).obj x = (pullback f).obj ((pullback g).obj x) := by
induction' x using Quotient.inductionOn' with t
exact Quotient.sound ⟨(MonoOver.pullbackComp _ _).app t⟩
theorem pullback_obj_mk {A B X Y : C} {f : Y ⟶ X} {i : A ⟶ X} [Mono i]
{j : B ⟶ Y} [Mono j] {f' : B ⟶ A}
(h : IsPullback f' j i f) :
(pullback f).obj (mk i) = mk j :=
((equivMonoOver Y).inverse.mapIso
(MonoOver.pullbackObjIsoOfIsPullback _ _ _ _ h)).to_eq
theorem pullback_obj {X Y : C} (f : Y ⟶ X) (x : Subobject X) :
(pullback f).obj x = mk (pullback.snd x.arrow f) := by
obtain ⟨Z, i, _, rfl⟩ := mk_surjective x
rw [pullback_obj_mk (IsPullback.of_hasPullback i f)]
| exact mk_eq_mk_of_comm _ _ (asIso (pullback.map i f (mk i).arrow f
(underlyingIso i).inv (𝟙 _) (𝟙 _) (by simp) (by simp))) (by simp)
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Subobject/Basic.lean | 556 | 558 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kenny Lau. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kenny Lau, Antoine Chambert-Loir
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Hom.CompTypeclasses
import Mathlib.Algebra.Module.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Prod
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Action.Basic
/-!
# Equivariant homomorphisms
## Main definitions
* `MulActionHom φ X Y`, the type of equivariant functions from `X` to `Y`,
where `φ : M → N` is a map, `M` acting on the type `X` and `N` acting on the type of `Y`.
`AddActionHom φ X Y` is its additive version.
* `DistribMulActionHom φ A B`,
the type of equivariant additive monoid homomorphisms from `A` to `B`,
where `φ : M → N` is a morphism of monoids,
`M` acting on the additive monoid `A` and `N` acting on the additive monoid of `B`
* `SMulSemiringHom φ R S`, the type of equivariant ring homomorphisms
from `R` to `S`, where `φ : M → N` is a morphism of monoids,
`M` acting on the ring `R` and `N` acting on the ring `S`.
The above types have corresponding classes:
* `MulActionHomClass F φ X Y` states that `F` is a type of bundled `X → Y` homs
which are `φ`-equivariant;
`AddActionHomClass F φ X Y` is its additive version.
* `DistribMulActionHomClass F φ A B` states that `F` is a type of bundled `A → B` homs
preserving the additive monoid structure and `φ`-equivariant
* `SMulSemiringHomClass F φ R S` states that `F` is a type of bundled `R → S` homs
preserving the ring structure and `φ`-equivariant
## Notation
We introduce the following notation to code equivariant maps
(the subscript index `ₑ` is for *equivariant*) :
* `X →ₑ[φ] Y` is `MulActionHom φ X Y` and `AddActionHom φ X Y`
* `A →ₑ+[φ] B` is `DistribMulActionHom φ A B`.
* `R →ₑ+*[φ] S` is `MulSemiringActionHom φ R S`.
When `M = N` and `φ = MonoidHom.id M`, we provide the backward compatible notation :
* `X →[M] Y` is `MulActionHom (@id M) X Y` and `AddActionHom (@id M) X Y`
* `A →+[M] B` is `DistribMulActionHom (MonoidHom.id M) A B`
* `R →+*[M] S` is `MulSemiringActionHom (MonoidHom.id M) R S`
The notation for `MulActionHom` and `AddActionHom` is the same, because it is unlikely
that it could lead to confusion — unless one needs types `M` and `X` with simultaneous
instances of `Mul M`, `Add M`, `SMul M X` and `VAdd M X`…
-/
assert_not_exists Submonoid
section MulActionHom
variable {M' : Type*}
variable {M : Type*} {N : Type*} {P : Type*}
variable (φ : M → N) (ψ : N → P) (χ : M → P)
variable (X : Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul M' X]
variable (Y : Type*) [SMul N Y] [SMul M' Y]
variable (Z : Type*) [SMul P Z]
/-- Equivariant functions :
When `φ : M → N` is a function, and types `X` and `Y` are endowed with additive actions
of `M` and `N`, a function `f : X → Y` is `φ`-equivariant if `f (m +ᵥ x) = (φ m) +ᵥ (f x)`. -/
structure AddActionHom {M N : Type*} (φ: M → N) (X : Type*) [VAdd M X] (Y : Type*) [VAdd N Y] where
/-- The underlying function. -/
protected toFun : X → Y
/-- The proposition that the function commutes with the additive actions. -/
protected map_vadd' : ∀ (m : M) (x : X), toFun (m +ᵥ x) = (φ m) +ᵥ toFun x
/-- Equivariant functions :
When `φ : M → N` is a function, and types `X` and `Y` are endowed with actions of `M` and `N`,
a function `f : X → Y` is `φ`-equivariant if `f (m • x) = (φ m) • (f x)`. -/
@[to_additive]
structure MulActionHom where
/-- The underlying function. -/
protected toFun : X → Y
/-- The proposition that the function commutes with the actions. -/
protected map_smul' : ∀ (m : M) (x : X), toFun (m • x) = (φ m) • toFun x
/- Porting note: local notation given a name, conflict with Algebra.Hom.GroupAction
see https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/issues/2000 -/
/-- `φ`-equivariant functions `X → Y`,
where `φ : M → N`, where `M` and `N` act on `X` and `Y` respectively. -/
notation:25 (name := «MulActionHomLocal≺») X " →ₑ[" φ:25 "] " Y:0 => MulActionHom φ X Y
/-- `M`-equivariant functions `X → Y` with respect to the action of `M`.
This is the same as `X →ₑ[@id M] Y`. -/
notation:25 (name := «MulActionHomIdLocal≺») X " →[" M:25 "] " Y:0 => MulActionHom (@id M) X Y
/-- `φ`-equivariant functions `X → Y`,
where `φ : M → N`, where `M` and `N` act additively on `X` and `Y` respectively
We use the same notation as for multiplicative actions, as conflicts are unlikely. -/
notation:25 (name := «AddActionHomLocal≺») X " →ₑ[" φ:25 "] " Y:0 => AddActionHom φ X Y
/-- `M`-equivariant functions `X → Y` with respect to the additive action of `M`.
This is the same as `X →ₑ[@id M] Y`.
We use the same notation as for multiplicative actions, as conflicts are unlikely. -/
notation:25 (name := «AddActionHomIdLocal≺») X " →[" M:25 "] " Y:0 => AddActionHom (@id M) X Y
/-- `AddActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y` states that
`F` is a type of morphisms which are `φ`-equivariant.
You should extend this class when you extend `AddActionHom`. -/
class AddActionSemiHomClass (F : Type*)
{M N : outParam Type*} (φ : outParam (M → N))
(X Y : outParam Type*) [VAdd M X] [VAdd N Y] [FunLike F X Y] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves the action. -/
map_vaddₛₗ : ∀ (f : F) (c : M) (x : X), f (c +ᵥ x) = (φ c) +ᵥ (f x)
/-- `MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y` states that
`F` is a type of morphisms which are `φ`-equivariant.
You should extend this class when you extend `MulActionHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
class MulActionSemiHomClass (F : Type*)
{M N : outParam Type*} (φ : outParam (M → N))
(X Y : outParam Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul N Y] [FunLike F X Y] : Prop where
/-- The proposition that the function preserves the action. -/
map_smulₛₗ : ∀ (f : F) (c : M) (x : X), f (c • x) = (φ c) • (f x)
export MulActionSemiHomClass (map_smulₛₗ)
export AddActionSemiHomClass (map_vaddₛₗ)
/-- `MulActionHomClass F M X Y` states that `F` is a type of
morphisms which are equivariant with respect to actions of `M`
This is an abbreviation of `MulActionSemiHomClass`. -/
@[to_additive "`MulActionHomClass F M X Y` states that `F` is a type of
morphisms which are equivariant with respect to actions of `M`
This is an abbreviation of `MulActionSemiHomClass`."]
abbrev MulActionHomClass (F : Type*) (M : outParam Type*)
(X Y : outParam Type*) [SMul M X] [SMul M Y] [FunLike F X Y] :=
MulActionSemiHomClass F (@id M) X Y
@[to_additive] instance : FunLike (MulActionHom φ X Y) X Y where
coe := MulActionHom.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem map_smul {F M X Y : Type*} [SMul M X] [SMul M Y]
[FunLike F X Y] [MulActionHomClass F M X Y]
(f : F) (c : M) (x : X) : f (c • x) = c • f x :=
map_smulₛₗ f c x
@[to_additive]
instance : MulActionSemiHomClass (X →ₑ[φ] Y) φ X Y where
map_smulₛₗ := MulActionHom.map_smul'
initialize_simps_projections MulActionHom (toFun → apply)
initialize_simps_projections AddActionHom (toFun → apply)
namespace MulActionHom
variable {φ X Y}
variable {F : Type*} [FunLike F X Y]
/-- Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y`
into an actual `MulActionHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `MulActionSemiHom φ X Y`. -/
@[to_additive (attr := coe)
"Turn an element of a type `F` satisfying `AddActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y`
into an actual `AddActionHom`.
This is declared as the default coercion from `F` to `AddActionSemiHom φ X Y`."]
def _root_.MulActionSemiHomClass.toMulActionHom [MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y] (f : F) :
X →ₑ[φ] Y where
toFun := DFunLike.coe f
map_smul' := map_smulₛₗ f
/-- Any type satisfying `MulActionSemiHomClass` can be cast into `MulActionHom` via
`MulActionHomSemiClass.toMulActionHom`. -/
@[to_additive]
instance [MulActionSemiHomClass F φ X Y] : CoeTC F (X →ₑ[φ] Y) :=
⟨MulActionSemiHomClass.toMulActionHom⟩
variable (M' X Y F) in
/-- If Y/X/M forms a scalar tower, any map X → Y preserving X-action also preserves M-action. -/
@[to_additive]
theorem _root_.IsScalarTower.smulHomClass [MulOneClass X] [SMul X Y] [IsScalarTower M' X Y]
[MulActionHomClass F X X Y] : MulActionHomClass F M' X Y where
map_smulₛₗ f m x := by
rw [← mul_one (m • x), ← smul_eq_mul, map_smul, smul_assoc, ← map_smul,
smul_eq_mul, mul_one, id_eq]
@[to_additive]
protected theorem map_smul (f : X →[M'] Y) (m : M') (x : X) : f (m • x) = m • f x :=
map_smul f m x
@[to_additive (attr := ext)]
theorem ext {f g : X →ₑ[φ] Y} :
(∀ x, f x = g x) → f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g
@[to_additive]
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : X →ₑ[φ] Y} (h : f = g) (x : X) :
f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h _
/-- Two equal maps on scalars give rise to an equivariant map for identity -/
@[to_additive "Two equal maps on scalars give rise to an equivariant map for identity"]
def ofEq {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) : X →ₑ[φ'] Y where
toFun := f.toFun
map_smul' m a := h ▸ f.map_smul' m a
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofEq_coe {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) :
(f.ofEq h).toFun = f.toFun := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem ofEq_apply {φ' : M → N} (h : φ = φ') (f : X →ₑ[φ] Y) (a : X) :
(f.ofEq h) a = f a :=
rfl
lemma _root_.FaithfulSMul.of_injective
[FaithfulSMul M' X] [MulActionHomClass F M' X Y] (f : F)
(hf : Function.Injective f) :
FaithfulSMul M' Y where
eq_of_smul_eq_smul {_ _} h := eq_of_smul_eq_smul fun m ↦ hf <| by simp_rw [map_smul, h]
variable {ψ χ} (M N)
/-- The identity map as an equivariant map. -/
@[to_additive "The identity map as an equivariant map."]
protected def id : X →[M] X :=
⟨id, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
variable {M N Z}
| @[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem id_apply (x : X) :
MulActionHom.id M x = x :=
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/GroupAction/Hom.lean | 235 | 237 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.ObjectProperty.ClosedUnderIsomorphisms
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.Triangulated
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Localization
/-! # Triangulated subcategories
In this file, we introduce the notion of triangulated subcategory of
a pretriangulated category `C`. If `S : Subcategory W`, we define the
class of morphisms `S.W : MorphismProperty C` consisting of morphisms
whose "cone" belongs to `S` (up to isomorphisms). We show that `S.W`
has both calculus of left and right fractions.
## TODO
* obtain (pre)triangulated instances on the localized category with respect to `S.W`
* define the type `S.category` as `Fullsubcategory S.set` and show that it
is a pretriangulated category.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of `Triangulated.Subcategory`, we do not assume that the predicate
on objects is closed under isomorphisms (i.e. that the subcategory is "strictly full").
Part of the theory would be more convenient under this stronger assumption
(e.g. `Subcategory C` would be a lattice), but some applications require this:
for example, the subcategory of bounded below complexes in the homotopy category
of an additive category is not closed under isomorphisms.
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Preadditive ZeroObject
namespace Triangulated
open Pretriangulated
variable (C : Type*) [Category C] [HasZeroObject C] [HasShift C ℤ]
[Preadditive C] [∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C]
/-- A triangulated subcategory of a pretriangulated category `C` consists of
a predicate `P : C → Prop` which contains a zero object, is stable by shifts, and such that
if `X₁ ⟶ X₂ ⟶ X₃ ⟶ X₁⟦1⟧` is a distinguished triangle such that if `X₁` and `X₃` satisfy
`P` then `X₂` is isomorphic to an object satisfying `P`. -/
structure Subcategory where
/-- the underlying predicate on objects of a triangulated subcategory -/
P : ObjectProperty C
zero' : ∃ (Z : C) (_ : IsZero Z), P Z
shift (X : C) (n : ℤ) : P X → P (X⟦n⟧)
ext₂' (T : Triangle C) (_ : T ∈ distTriang C) : P T.obj₁ → P T.obj₃ → P.isoClosure T.obj₂
namespace Subcategory
variable {C}
variable (S : Subcategory C)
lemma zero [S.P.IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms] : S.P 0 := by
obtain ⟨X, hX, mem⟩ := S.zero'
exact S.P.prop_of_iso hX.isoZero mem
/-- The closure under isomorphisms of a triangulated subcategory. -/
def isoClosure : Subcategory C where
P := S.P.isoClosure
zero' := by
obtain ⟨Z, hZ, hZ'⟩ := S.zero'
exact ⟨Z, hZ, Z, hZ', ⟨Iso.refl _⟩⟩
shift X n := by
rintro ⟨Y, hY, ⟨e⟩⟩
exact ⟨Y⟦n⟧, S.shift Y n hY, ⟨(shiftFunctor C n).mapIso e⟩⟩
ext₂' := by
rintro T hT ⟨X₁, h₁, ⟨e₁⟩⟩ ⟨X₃, h₃, ⟨e₃⟩⟩
exact ObjectProperty.le_isoClosure _ _
(S.ext₂' (Triangle.mk (e₁.inv ≫ T.mor₁) (T.mor₂ ≫ e₃.hom) (e₃.inv ≫ T.mor₃ ≫ e₁.hom⟦1⟧'))
(isomorphic_distinguished _ hT _
(Triangle.isoMk _ _ e₁.symm (Iso.refl _) e₃.symm (by simp) (by simp) (by
dsimp
simp only [assoc, Iso.cancel_iso_inv_left, ← Functor.map_comp, e₁.hom_inv_id,
Functor.map_id, comp_id]))) h₁ h₃)
instance : S.isoClosure.P.IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms := by
dsimp only [isoClosure]
infer_instance
section
variable (P : ObjectProperty C) (zero : P 0)
(shift : ∀ (X : C) (n : ℤ), P X → P (X⟦n⟧))
(ext₂ : ∀ (T : Triangle C) (_ : T ∈ distTriang C), P T.obj₁ → P T.obj₃ → P T.obj₂)
/-- An alternative constructor for "strictly full" triangulated subcategory. -/
def mk' : Subcategory C where
P := P
zero' := ⟨0, isZero_zero _, zero⟩
shift := shift
ext₂' T hT h₁ h₃ := P.le_isoClosure _ (ext₂ T hT h₁ h₃)
instance : (mk' P zero shift ext₂).P.IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms where
of_iso {X Y} e hX := by
refine ext₂ (Triangle.mk e.hom (0 : Y ⟶ 0) 0) ?_ hX zero
refine isomorphic_distinguished _ (contractible_distinguished X) _ ?_
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) e.symm (Iso.refl _)
end
lemma ext₂ [S.P.IsClosedUnderIsomorphisms]
(T : Triangle C) (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) (h₁ : S.P T.obj₁)
(h₃ : S.P T.obj₃) : S.P T.obj₂ := by
simpa only [ObjectProperty.isoClosure_eq_self] using S.ext₂' T hT h₁ h₃
/-- Given `S : Triangulated.Subcategory C`, this is the class of morphisms on `C` which
consists of morphisms whose cone satisfies `S.P`. -/
def W : MorphismProperty C := fun X Y f => ∃ (Z : C) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧)
(_ : Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C), S.P Z
lemma W_iff {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
S.W f ↔ ∃ (Z : C) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧)
(_ : Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C), S.P Z := by rfl
lemma W_iff' {Y Z : C} (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
S.W g ↔ ∃ (X : C) (f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Z ⟶ X⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧)
(_ : Triangle.mk f g h ∈ distTriang C), S.P X := by
rw [S.W_iff]
constructor
· rintro ⟨Z, g, h, H, mem⟩
exact ⟨_, _, _, inv_rot_of_distTriang _ H, S.shift _ (-1) mem⟩
· rintro ⟨Z, g, h, H, mem⟩
exact ⟨_, _, _, rot_of_distTriang _ H, S.shift _ 1 mem⟩
lemma W.mk {T : Triangle C} (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) (h : S.P T.obj₃) : S.W T.mor₁ :=
⟨_, _, _, hT, h⟩
lemma W.mk' {T : Triangle C} (hT : T ∈ distTriang C) (h : S.P T.obj₁) : S.W T.mor₂ := by
rw [W_iff']
exact ⟨_, _, _, hT, h⟩
lemma isoClosure_W : S.isoClosure.W = S.W := by
ext X Y f
constructor
· rintro ⟨Z, g, h, mem, ⟨Z', hZ', ⟨e⟩⟩⟩
refine ⟨Z', g ≫ e.hom, e.inv ≫ h, isomorphic_distinguished _ mem _ ?_, hZ'⟩
exact Triangle.isoMk _ _ (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) e.symm
· rintro ⟨Z, g, h, mem, hZ⟩
| exact ⟨Z, g, h, mem, ObjectProperty.le_isoClosure _ _ hZ⟩
instance respectsIso_W : S.W.RespectsIso where
precomp {X' X Y} e (he : IsIso e) := by
rintro f ⟨Z, g, h, mem, mem'⟩
refine ⟨Z, g, h ≫ inv e⟦(1 : ℤ)⟧', isomorphic_distinguished _ mem _ ?_, mem'⟩
refine Triangle.isoMk _ _ (asIso e) (Iso.refl _) (Iso.refl _) (by simp) (by simp) ?_
dsimp
simp only [Functor.map_inv, assoc, IsIso.inv_hom_id, comp_id, id_comp]
postcomp {X Y Y'} e (he : IsIso e) := by
rintro f ⟨Z, g, h, mem, mem'⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Triangulated/Subcategory.lean | 154 | 164 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.MeasurablyGenerated
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.NullMeasurable
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Monotone
/-!
# Measure spaces
The definition of a measure and a measure space are in `MeasureTheory.MeasureSpaceDef`, with
only a few basic properties. This file provides many more properties of these objects.
This separation allows the measurability tactic to import only the file `MeasureSpaceDef`, and to
be available in `MeasureSpace` (through `MeasurableSpace`).
Given a measurable space `α`, a measure on `α` is a function that sends measurable sets to the
extended nonnegative reals that satisfies the following conditions:
1. `μ ∅ = 0`;
2. `μ` is countably additive. This means that the measure of a countable union of pairwise disjoint
sets is equal to the measure of the individual sets.
Every measure can be canonically extended to an outer measure, so that it assigns values to
all subsets, not just the measurable subsets. On the other hand, a measure that is countably
additive on measurable sets can be restricted to measurable sets to obtain a measure.
In this file a measure is defined to be an outer measure that is countably additive on
measurable sets, with the additional assumption that the outer measure is the canonical
extension of the restricted measure.
Measures on `α` form a complete lattice, and are closed under scalar multiplication with `ℝ≥0∞`.
Given a measure, the null sets are the sets where `μ s = 0`, where `μ` denotes the corresponding
outer measure (so `s` might not be measurable). We can then define the completion of `μ` as the
measure on the least `σ`-algebra that also contains all null sets, by defining the measure to be `0`
on the null sets.
## Main statements
* `completion` is the completion of a measure to all null measurable sets.
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` and `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` are two important ways to define a measure.
## Implementation notes
Given `μ : Measure α`, `μ s` is the value of the *outer measure* applied to `s`.
This conveniently allows us to apply the measure to sets without proving that they are measurable.
We get countable subadditivity for all sets, but only countable additivity for measurable sets.
You often don't want to define a measure via its constructor.
Two ways that are sometimes more convenient:
* `Measure.ofMeasurable` is a way to define a measure by only giving its value on measurable sets
and proving the properties (1) and (2) mentioned above.
* `OuterMeasure.toMeasure` is a way of obtaining a measure from an outer measure by showing that
all measurable sets in the measurable space are Carathéodory measurable.
To prove that two measures are equal, there are multiple options:
* `ext`: two measures are equal if they are equal on all measurable sets.
* `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion`: two measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system generating
the measurable sets, if the π-system contains a spanning increasing sequence of sets where the
measures take finite value (in particular the measures are σ-finite). This is a special case of
the more general `ext_of_generateFrom_of_cover`
* `ext_of_generate_finite`: two finite measures are equal if they are equal on a π-system
generating the measurable sets. This is a special case of `ext_of_generateFrom_of_iUnion` using
`C ∪ {univ}`, but is easier to work with.
A `MeasureSpace` is a class that is a measurable space with a canonical measure.
The measure is denoted `volume`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Complete_measure>
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_everywhere>
## Tags
measure, almost everywhere, measure space, completion, null set, null measurable set
-/
noncomputable section
open Set
open Filter hiding map
open Function MeasurableSpace Topology Filter ENNReal NNReal Interval MeasureTheory
open scoped symmDiff
variable {α β γ δ ι R R' : Type*}
namespace MeasureTheory
section
variable {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set α}
instance ae_isMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated (ae μ) :=
⟨fun _s hs =>
let ⟨t, hst, htm, htμ⟩ := exists_measurable_superset_of_null hs
⟨tᶜ, compl_mem_ae_iff.2 htμ, htm.compl, compl_subset_comm.1 hst⟩⟩
/-- See also `MeasureTheory.ae_restrict_uIoc_iff`. -/
theorem ae_uIoc_iff [LinearOrder α] {a b : α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ι a b → P x) ↔ (∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc a b → P x) ∧ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ Ioc b a → P x := by
simp only [uIoc_eq_union, mem_union, or_imp, eventually_and]
theorem measure_union (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₂) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀ h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_union' (hd : Disjoint s₁ s₂) (h : MeasurableSet s₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ s₂) = μ s₁ + μ s₂ :=
measure_union₀' h.nullMeasurableSet hd.aedisjoint
theorem measure_inter_add_diff (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s ∩ t) + μ (s \ t) = μ s :=
measure_inter_add_diff₀ _ ht.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_diff_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) : μ (s \ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s :=
(add_comm _ _).trans (measure_inter_add_diff s ht)
theorem measure_diff_eq_top (hs : μ s = ∞) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (s \ t) = ∞ := by
contrapose! hs
exact ((measure_mono (subset_diff_union s t)).trans_lt
((measure_union_le _ _).trans_lt (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs.lt_top, ht.lt_top⟩))).ne
theorem measure_union_add_inter (s : Set α) (ht : MeasurableSet t) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff (s ∪ t) ht, Set.union_inter_cancel_right, union_diff_right, ←
measure_inter_add_diff s ht]
ac_rfl
theorem measure_union_add_inter' (hs : MeasurableSet s) (t : Set α) :
μ (s ∪ t) + μ (s ∩ t) = μ s + μ t := by
rw [union_comm, inter_comm, measure_union_add_inter t hs, add_comm]
lemma measure_symmDiff_eq (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : NullMeasurableSet t μ) :
μ (s ∆ t) = μ (s \ t) + μ (t \ s) := by
simpa only [symmDiff_def, sup_eq_union]
using measure_union₀ (ht.diff hs) disjoint_sdiff_sdiff.aedisjoint
lemma measure_symmDiff_le (s t u : Set α) :
μ (s ∆ u) ≤ μ (s ∆ t) + μ (t ∆ u) :=
le_trans (μ.mono <| symmDiff_triangle s t u) (measure_union_le (s ∆ t) (t ∆ u))
theorem measure_symmDiff_eq_top (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) (ht : μ t = ∞) : μ (s ∆ t) = ∞ :=
measure_mono_top subset_union_right (measure_diff_eq_top ht hs)
theorem measure_add_measure_compl (h : MeasurableSet s) : μ s + μ sᶜ = μ univ :=
measure_add_measure_compl₀ h.nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_biUnion₀ {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable)
(hd : s.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (h : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) := by
haveI := hs.toEncodable
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion₀ (hd.on_injective Subtype.coe_injective fun x => x.2) fun x => h x x.2
theorem measure_biUnion {s : Set β} {f : β → Set α} (hs : s.Countable) (hd : s.PairwiseDisjoint f)
(h : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑' p : s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion₀ hs hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (h b hb).nullMeasurableSet
theorem measure_sUnion₀ {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ))
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, NullMeasurableSet s μ) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion₀ hs hd h]
theorem measure_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hs : S.Countable) (hd : S.Pairwise Disjoint)
(h : ∀ s ∈ S, MeasurableSet s) : μ (⋃₀ S) = ∑' s : S, μ s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, measure_biUnion hs hd h]
theorem measure_biUnion_finset₀ {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α}
(hd : Set.Pairwise (↑s) (AEDisjoint μ on f)) (hm : ∀ b ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (f b) μ) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) := by
rw [← Finset.sum_attach, Finset.attach_eq_univ, ← tsum_fintype]
exact measure_biUnion₀ s.countable_toSet hd hm
theorem measure_biUnion_finset {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → Set α} (hd : PairwiseDisjoint (↑s) f)
(hm : ∀ b ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f b)) : μ (⋃ b ∈ s, f b) = ∑ p ∈ s, μ (f p) :=
measure_biUnion_finset₀ hd.aedisjoint fun b hb => (hm b hb).nullMeasurableSet
/-- The measure of an a.e. disjoint union (even uncountable) of null-measurable sets is at least
the sum of the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, NullMeasurableSet (As i) μ)
(As_disj : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum, iSup_le_iff]
intro s
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ (fun _i _hi _j _hj hij => As_disj hij) fun i _ => As_mble i]
gcongr
exact iUnion_subset fun _ ↦ Subset.rfl
/-- The measure of a disjoint union (even uncountable) of measurable sets is at least the sum of
the measures of the sets. -/
theorem tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint {ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{As : ι → Set α} (As_mble : ∀ i : ι, MeasurableSet (As i))
(As_disj : Pairwise (Disjoint on As)) : (∑' i, μ (As i)) ≤ μ (⋃ i, As i) :=
tsum_meas_le_meas_iUnion_of_disjoint₀ μ (fun i ↦ (As_mble i).nullMeasurableSet)
(fun _ _ h ↦ Disjoint.aedisjoint (As_disj h))
/-- If `s` is a countable set, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem tsum_measure_preimage_singleton {s : Set β} (hs : s.Countable) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑' b : s, μ (f ⁻¹' {↑b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← Set.biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion hs (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf]
lemma measure_preimage_eq_zero_iff_of_countable {s : Set β} {f : α → β} (hs : s.Countable) :
μ (f ⁻¹' s) = 0 ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {x}) = 0 := by
rw [← biUnion_preimage_singleton, measure_biUnion_null_iff hs]
/-- If `s` is a `Finset`, then the measure of its preimage can be found as the sum of measures
of the fibers `f ⁻¹' {y}`. -/
theorem sum_measure_preimage_singleton (s : Finset β) {f : α → β}
(hf : ∀ y ∈ s, MeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' {y})) : (∑ b ∈ s, μ (f ⁻¹' {b})) = μ (f ⁻¹' ↑s) := by
simp only [← measure_biUnion_finset (pairwiseDisjoint_fiber f s) hf,
Finset.set_biUnion_preimage_singleton]
@[simp] lemma sum_measure_singleton {s : Finset α} [MeasurableSingletonClass α] :
∑ x ∈ s, μ {x} = μ s := by
trans ∑ x ∈ s, μ (id ⁻¹' {x})
· simp
rw [sum_measure_preimage_singleton]
· simp
· simp
theorem measure_diff_null' (h : μ (s₁ ∩ s₂) = 0) : μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ :=
measure_congr <| diff_ae_eq_self.2 h
theorem measure_add_diff (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (t : Set α) :
μ s + μ (t \ s) = μ (s ∪ t) := by
rw [← measure_union₀' hs disjoint_sdiff_right.aedisjoint, union_diff_self]
theorem measure_diff' (s : Set α) (hm : NullMeasurableSet t μ) (h_fin : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (s \ t) = μ (s ∪ t) - μ t :=
ENNReal.eq_sub_of_add_eq h_fin <| by rw [add_comm, measure_add_diff hm, union_comm]
theorem measure_diff (h : s₂ ⊆ s₁) (h₂ : NullMeasurableSet s₂ μ) (h_fin : μ s₂ ≠ ∞) :
μ (s₁ \ s₂) = μ s₁ - μ s₂ := by rw [measure_diff' _ h₂ h_fin, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
theorem le_measure_diff : μ s₁ - μ s₂ ≤ μ (s₁ \ s₂) :=
tsub_le_iff_left.2 <| (measure_le_inter_add_diff μ s₁ s₂).trans <| by
gcongr; apply inter_subset_right
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has infinite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s = ∞ ↔ μ t = ∞ := by
suffices h : ∀ u v, μ (u ∆ v) ≠ ∞ → μ u = ∞ → μ v = ∞
from ⟨h s t hμst, h t s (symmDiff_comm s t ▸ hμst)⟩
intro u v hμuv hμu
by_contra! hμv
apply hμuv
rw [Set.symmDiff_def, eq_top_iff]
calc
∞ = μ u - μ v := by rw [ENNReal.sub_eq_top_iff.2 ⟨hμu, hμv⟩]
_ ≤ μ (u \ v) := le_measure_diff
_ ≤ μ (u \ v ∪ v \ u) := measure_mono subset_union_left
/-- If the measure of the symmetric difference of two sets is finite,
then one has finite measure if and only if the other one does. -/
theorem measure_ne_top_iff_of_symmDiff (hμst : μ (s ∆ t) ≠ ∞) : μ s ≠ ∞ ↔ μ t ≠ ∞ :=
(measure_eq_top_iff_of_symmDiff hμst).ne
theorem measure_diff_lt_of_lt_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} (h : μ t < μ s + ε) : μ (t \ s) < ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs']; rw [add_comm] at h
exact ENNReal.sub_lt_of_lt_add (measure_mono hst) h
theorem measure_diff_le_iff_le_add (hs : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hs' : μ s ≠ ∞)
{ε : ℝ≥0∞} : μ (t \ s) ≤ ε ↔ μ t ≤ μ s + ε := by
rw [measure_diff hst hs hs', tsub_le_iff_left]
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_null_diff {s t : Set α} (hst : s ⊆ t) (h_nulldiff : μ (t \ s) = 0) :
μ s = μ t := measure_congr <|
EventuallyLE.antisymm (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE hst) (ae_le_set.mpr h_nulldiff)
theorem measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃)
(h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ ∧ μ s₂ = μ s₃ := by
have le12 : μ s₁ ≤ μ s₂ := measure_mono h12
have le23 : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₃ := measure_mono h23
have key : μ s₃ ≤ μ s₁ :=
calc
μ s₃ = μ (s₃ \ s₁ ∪ s₁) := by rw [diff_union_of_subset (h12.trans h23)]
_ ≤ μ (s₃ \ s₁) + μ s₁ := measure_union_le _ _
_ = μ s₁ := by simp only [h_nulldiff, zero_add]
exact ⟨le12.antisymm (le23.trans key), le23.antisymm (key.trans le12)⟩
theorem measure_eq_measure_smaller_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₁ = μ s₂ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).1
theorem measure_eq_measure_larger_of_between_null_diff {s₁ s₂ s₃ : Set α} (h12 : s₁ ⊆ s₂)
(h23 : s₂ ⊆ s₃) (h_nulldiff : μ (s₃ \ s₁) = 0) : μ s₂ = μ s₃ :=
(measure_eq_measure_of_between_null_diff h12 h23 h_nulldiff).2
lemma measure_compl₀ (h : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (hs : μ s ≠ ∞) :
μ sᶜ = μ Set.univ - μ s := by
rw [← measure_add_measure_compl₀ h, ENNReal.add_sub_cancel_left hs]
theorem measure_compl (h₁ : MeasurableSet s) (h_fin : μ s ≠ ∞) : μ sᶜ = μ univ - μ s :=
measure_compl₀ h₁.nullMeasurableSet h_fin
lemma measure_inter_conull' (ht : μ (s \ t) = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null']; rwa [← diff_eq]
lemma measure_inter_conull (ht : μ tᶜ = 0) : μ (s ∩ t) = μ s := by
rw [← diff_compl, measure_diff_null ht]
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] s ↔ t ≤ᵐ[μ] s := by
rw [ae_le_set]
refine
⟨fun h => by simpa only [union_diff_left] using (ae_eq_set.mp h).1, fun h =>
eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr
⟨by rwa [ae_le_set, union_diff_left],
HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE subset_union_left⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem union_ae_eq_right_iff_ae_subset : (s ∪ t : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] t ↔ s ≤ᵐ[μ] t := by
rw [union_comm, union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset]
theorem ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ≤ᵐ[μ] t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s)
(hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t := by
refine eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff.mpr ⟨h₁, ae_le_set.mpr ?_⟩
replace h₂ : μ t = μ s := h₂.antisymm (measure_mono_ae h₁)
replace ht : μ s ≠ ∞ := h₂ ▸ ht
rw [measure_diff' t hsm ht, measure_congr (union_ae_eq_left_iff_ae_subset.mpr h₁), h₂, tsub_self]
/-- If `s ⊆ t`, `μ t ≤ μ s`, `μ t ≠ ∞`, and `s` is measurable, then `s =ᵐ[μ] t`. -/
theorem ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge (h₁ : s ⊆ t) (h₂ : μ t ≤ μ s) (hsm : NullMeasurableSet s μ)
(ht : μ t ≠ ∞) : s =ᵐ[μ] t :=
ae_eq_of_ae_subset_of_measure_ge (HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE h₁) h₂ hsm ht
theorem measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} {t : ι → Set α}
(hsub : ∀ i, s i ⊆ t i) (h_le : ∀ i, μ (t i) ≤ μ (s i)) : μ (⋃ i, s i) = μ (⋃ i, t i) := by
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr; apply hsub) ?_
rcases Classical.em (∃ i, μ (t i) = ∞) with (⟨i, hi⟩ | htop)
· calc
μ (⋃ i, t i) ≤ ∞ := le_top
_ ≤ μ (s i) := hi ▸ h_le i
_ ≤ μ (⋃ i, s i) := measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _
push_neg at htop
set M := toMeasurable μ
have H : ∀ b, (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b) : Set α) =ᵐ[μ] M (t b) := by
refine fun b => ae_eq_of_subset_of_measure_ge inter_subset_left ?_ ?_ ?_
· calc
μ (M (t b)) = μ (t b) := measure_toMeasurable _
_ ≤ μ (s b) := h_le b
_ ≤ μ (M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) :=
measure_mono <|
subset_inter ((hsub b).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
((subset_iUnion _ _).trans <| subset_toMeasurable _ _)
· measurability
· rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact htop b
calc
μ (⋃ b, t b) ≤ μ (⋃ b, M (t b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_mono fun b => subset_toMeasurable _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ b, M (t b) ∩ M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_congr (EventuallyEq.countable_iUnion H).symm
_ ≤ μ (M (⋃ b, s b)) := measure_mono (iUnion_subset fun b => inter_subset_right)
_ = μ (⋃ b, s b) := measure_toMeasurable _
theorem measure_union_congr_of_subset {t₁ t₂ : Set α} (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (hsμ : μ s₂ ≤ μ s₁)
(ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) (htμ : μ t₂ ≤ μ t₁) : μ (s₁ ∪ t₁) = μ (s₂ ∪ t₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion, union_eq_iUnion]
exact measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨ht, hs⟩) (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨htμ, hsμ⟩)
@[simp]
theorem measure_iUnion_toMeasurable {ι : Sort*} [Countable ι] (s : ι → Set α) :
μ (⋃ i, toMeasurable μ (s i)) = μ (⋃ i, s i) :=
Eq.symm <| measure_iUnion_congr_of_subset (fun _i => subset_toMeasurable _ _) fun _i ↦
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem measure_biUnion_toMeasurable {I : Set β} (hc : I.Countable) (s : β → Set α) :
μ (⋃ b ∈ I, toMeasurable μ (s b)) = μ (⋃ b ∈ I, s b) := by
haveI := hc.toEncodable
simp only [biUnion_eq_iUnion, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
@[simp]
theorem measure_toMeasurable_union : μ (toMeasurable μ s ∪ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset (subset_toMeasurable _ _) (measure_toMeasurable _).le Subset.rfl
le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem measure_union_toMeasurable : μ (s ∪ toMeasurable μ t) = μ (s ∪ t) :=
Eq.symm <|
measure_union_congr_of_subset Subset.rfl le_rfl (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable _).le
theorem sum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ) (H : Set.Pairwise s (AEDisjoint μ on t)) :
(∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_finset₀ H h]
exact measure_mono (subset_univ _)
theorem tsum_measure_le_measure_univ {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : Pairwise (AEDisjoint μ on s)) : ∑' i, μ (s i) ≤ μ (univ : Set α) := by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
exact iSup_le fun s =>
sum_measure_le_measure_univ (fun i _hi => hs i) fun i _hi j _hj hij => H hij
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `∑' i, μ (s i) > μ univ`, then
one of the intersections `s i ∩ s j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_tsum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α}
(μ : Measure α) {s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑' i, μ (s i)) : ∃ i j, i ≠ j ∧ (s i ∩ s j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply tsum_measure_le_measure_univ hs
intro i j hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i j hij)).aedisjoint
/-- Pigeonhole principle for measure spaces: if `s` is a `Finset` and
`∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i) > μ univ`, then one of the intersections `t i ∩ t j` is not empty. -/
theorem exists_nonempty_inter_of_measure_univ_lt_sum_measure {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α)
{s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, NullMeasurableSet (t i) μ)
(H : μ (univ : Set α) < ∑ i ∈ s, μ (t i)) :
∃ i ∈ s, ∃ j ∈ s, ∃ _h : i ≠ j, (t i ∩ t j).Nonempty := by
contrapose! H
apply sum_measure_le_measure_univ h
intro i hi j hj hij
exact (disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty.mpr (H i hi j hj hij)).aedisjoint
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `t` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(ht : MeasurableSet t) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [← Set.not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter]
contrapose! h
calc
μ s + μ t = μ (s ∪ t) := (measure_union h ht).symm
_ ≤ μ u := measure_mono (union_subset h's h't)
/-- If two sets `s` and `t` are included in a set `u`, and `μ s + μ t > μ u`,
then `s` intersects `t`. Version assuming that `s` is measurable. -/
theorem nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add' {m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) {s t u : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) (h's : s ⊆ u) (h't : t ⊆ u) (h : μ u < μ s + μ t) :
(s ∩ t).Nonempty := by
rw [add_comm] at h
rw [inter_comm]
exact nonempty_inter_of_measure_lt_add μ hs h't h's h
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a directed sequence of (not necessarily measurable) sets
is the supremum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iUnion [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α} (hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
-- WLOG, `ι = ℕ`
rcases Countable.exists_injective_nat ι with ⟨e, he⟩
generalize ht : Function.extend e s ⊥ = t
replace hd : Directed (· ⊆ ·) t := ht ▸ hd.extend_bot he
suffices μ (⋃ n, t n) = ⨆ n, μ (t n) by
simp only [← ht, Function.apply_extend μ, ← iSup_eq_iUnion, iSup_extend_bot he,
Function.comp_def, Pi.bot_apply, bot_eq_empty, measure_empty] at this
exact this.trans (iSup_extend_bot he _)
clear! ι
-- The `≥` inequality is trivial
refine le_antisymm ?_ (iSup_le fun i ↦ measure_mono <| subset_iUnion _ _)
-- Choose `T n ⊇ t n` of the same measure, put `Td n = disjointed T`
set T : ℕ → Set α := fun n => toMeasurable μ (t n)
set Td : ℕ → Set α := disjointed T
have hm : ∀ n, MeasurableSet (Td n) := .disjointed fun n ↦ measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
calc
μ (⋃ n, t n) = μ (⋃ n, Td n) := by rw [iUnion_disjointed, measure_iUnion_toMeasurable]
_ ≤ ∑' n, μ (Td n) := measure_iUnion_le _
_ = ⨆ I : Finset ℕ, ∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n) := ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := iSup_le fun I => by
rcases hd.finset_le I with ⟨N, hN⟩
calc
(∑ n ∈ I, μ (Td n)) = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, Td n) :=
(measure_biUnion_finset ((disjoint_disjointed T).set_pairwise I) fun n _ => hm n).symm
_ ≤ μ (⋃ n ∈ I, T n) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_mono fun n _hn => disjointed_subset _ _)
_ = μ (⋃ n ∈ I, t n) := measure_biUnion_toMeasurable I.countable_toSet _
_ ≤ μ (t N) := measure_mono (iUnion₂_subset hN)
_ ≤ ⨆ n, μ (t n) := le_iSup (μ ∘ t) N
/-- Continuity from below:
the measure of the union of a monotone family of sets is equal to the supremum of their measures.
The theorem assumes that the `atTop` filter on the index set is countably generated,
so it works for a family indexed by a countable type, as well as `ℝ`. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι with
| inl _ => simp
| inr _ =>
rcases exists_seq_monotone_tendsto_atTop_atTop ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
rw [← hs.iUnion_comp_tendsto_atTop hx, ← Monotone.iSup_comp_tendsto_atTop _ hx]
exacts [(hs.comp hxm).directed_le.measure_iUnion, fun _ _ h ↦ measure_mono (hs h)]
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iUnion [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s) :
μ (⋃ i, s i) = ⨆ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iUnion
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of
(not necessarily measurable) sets is the supremum of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {f : ι → Set α} :
μ (⋃ i, f i) = ⨆ i, μ (Accumulate f i) := by
rw [← iUnion_accumulate]
exact monotone_accumulate.measure_iUnion
theorem measure_biUnion_eq_iSup {s : ι → Set α} {t : Set ι} (ht : t.Countable)
(hd : DirectedOn ((· ⊆ ·) on s) t) : μ (⋃ i ∈ t, s i) = ⨆ i ∈ t, μ (s i) := by
haveI := ht.to_subtype
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion, hd.directed_val.measure_iUnion, ← iSup_subtype'']
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a directed downwards countable family of measurable sets
is the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Directed.measure_iInter [Countable ι] {s : ι → Set α}
(h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hd : Directed (· ⊇ ·) s) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
have : ∀ t ⊆ s k, μ t ≠ ∞ := fun t ht => ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk (measure_mono ht)
rw [← ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (iInf_le (fun i => μ (s i)) k), ENNReal.sub_iInf, ←
ENNReal.sub_sub_cancel hk (measure_mono (iInter_subset _ k)), ←
measure_diff (iInter_subset _ k) (.iInter h) (this _ (iInter_subset _ k)),
diff_iInter, Directed.measure_iUnion]
· congr 1
refine le_antisymm (iSup_mono' fun i => ?_) (iSup_mono fun i => le_measure_diff)
rcases hd i k with ⟨j, hji, hjk⟩
use j
rw [← measure_diff hjk (h _) (this _ hjk)]
gcongr
· exact hd.mono_comp _ fun _ _ => diff_subset_diff_right
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of a monotone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atBot` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Monotone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≥ ·)]
[(atBot : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Monotone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) := by
refine le_antisymm (le_iInf fun i ↦ measure_mono <| iInter_subset _ _) ?_
have := hfin.nonempty
rcases exists_seq_antitone_tendsto_atTop_atBot ι with ⟨x, hxm, hx⟩
calc
⨅ i, μ (s i) ≤ ⨅ n, μ (s (x n)) := le_iInf_comp (μ ∘ s) x
_ = μ (⋂ n, s (x n)) := by
refine .symm <| (hs.comp_antitone hxm).directed_ge.measure_iInter (fun n ↦ hsm _) ?_
rcases hfin with ⟨k, hk⟩
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot k).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| hs hn⟩
_ ≤ μ (⋂ i, s i) := by
refine measure_mono <| iInter_mono' fun i ↦ ?_
rcases (hx.eventually_le_atBot i).exists with ⟨n, hn⟩
exact ⟨n, hs hn⟩
/-- **Continuity from above**:
the measure of the intersection of an antitone family of measurable sets
indexed by a type with countably generated `atTop` filter
is equal to the infimum of the measures. -/
theorem _root_.Antitone.measure_iInter [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
[(atTop : Filter ι).IsCountablyGenerated] {s : ι → Set α} (hs : Antitone s)
(hsm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, s i) = ⨅ i, μ (s i) :=
hs.dual_left.measure_iInter hsm hfin
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of
measurable sets is the infimum of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : Measure α} [Countable ι] [Preorder ι] [IsDirected ι (· ≤ ·)]
{f : ι → Set α} (h : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
μ (⋂ i, f i) = ⨅ i, μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j) := by
rw [← Antitone.measure_iInter]
· rw [iInter_comm]
exact congrArg μ <| iInter_congr fun i ↦ (biInf_const nonempty_Ici).symm
· exact fun i j h ↦ biInter_mono (Iic_subset_Iic.2 h) fun _ _ ↦ Set.Subset.rfl
· exact fun i ↦ .biInter (to_countable _) fun _ _ ↦ h _
· refine hfin.imp fun k hk ↦ ne_top_of_le_ne_top hk <| measure_mono <| iInter₂_subset k ?_
rfl
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of an increasing sequence of (not necessarily
measurable) sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Monotone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iUnion]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hm : Antitone s) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋃ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hm.dual_left
/-- Continuity from below: the measure of the union of a sequence of (not necessarily measurable)
sets is the limit of the measures of the partial unions. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iUnion_accumulate {α ι : Type*}
[Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} {f : ι → Set α} :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (Accumulate f i)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋃ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [measure_iUnion_eq_iSup_accumulate]
exact tendsto_atTop_iSup fun i j hij ↦ by gcongr
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop [Preorder ι]
[IsCountablyGenerated (atTop : Filter ι)] {s : ι → Set α}
(hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Antitone s) (hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun h ↦ ?_
have := (atTop_neBot_iff.1 h).2
rw [hm.measure_iInter hs hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf fun n m hnm => measure_mono <| hm hnm
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of an increasing sequence of measurable
sets is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot [Preorder ι] [IsCountablyGenerated (atBot : Filter ι)]
{s : ι → Set α} (hs : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (s i) μ) (hm : Monotone s)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (s i) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) atBot (𝓝 (μ (⋂ n, s n))) :=
tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (ι := ιᵒᵈ) hs hm.dual_left hf
/-- Continuity from above: the measure of the intersection of a sequence of measurable
sets such that one has finite measure is the limit of the measures of the partial intersections. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_iInter_le {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[Countable ι] [Preorder ι] {f : ι → Set α} (hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ)
(hf : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞) :
Tendsto (fun i ↦ μ (⋂ j ≤ i, f j)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (⋂ i, f i))) := by
refine .of_neBot_imp fun hne ↦ ?_
cases atTop_neBot_iff.mp hne
rw [measure_iInter_eq_iInf_measure_iInter_le hm hf]
exact tendsto_atTop_iInf
fun i j hij ↦ measure_mono <| biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki ↦ le_trans hki hij
/-- Some version of continuity of a measure in the empty set using the intersection along a set of
sets. -/
theorem exists_measure_iInter_lt {α ι : Type*} {_ : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
[SemilatticeSup ι] [Countable ι] {f : ι → Set α}
(hm : ∀ i, NullMeasurableSet (f i) μ) {ε : ℝ≥0∞} (hε : 0 < ε) (hfin : ∃ i, μ (f i) ≠ ∞)
(hfem : ⋂ n, f n = ∅) : ∃ m, μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n) < ε := by
let F m := μ (⋂ n ≤ m, f n)
have hFAnti : Antitone F :=
fun i j hij => measure_mono (biInter_subset_biInter_left fun k hki => le_trans hki hij)
suffices Filter.Tendsto F Filter.atTop (𝓝 0) by
rw [@ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero_iff_lt_of_antitone
_ (nonempty_of_exists hfin) _ _ hFAnti] at this
exact this ε hε
have hzero : μ (⋂ n, f n) = 0 := by
simp only [hfem, measure_empty]
rw [← hzero]
exact tendsto_measure_iInter_le hm hfin
/-- The measure of the intersection of a decreasing sequence of measurable
sets indexed by a linear order with first countable topology is the limit of the measures. -/
theorem tendsto_measure_biInter_gt {ι : Type*} [LinearOrder ι] [TopologicalSpace ι]
[OrderTopology ι] [DenselyOrdered ι] [FirstCountableTopology ι] {s : ι → Set α}
{a : ι} (hs : ∀ r > a, NullMeasurableSet (s r) μ) (hm : ∀ i j, a < i → i ≤ j → s i ⊆ s j)
(hf : ∃ r > a, μ (s r) ≠ ∞) : Tendsto (μ ∘ s) (𝓝[Ioi a] a) (𝓝 (μ (⋂ r > a, s r))) := by
have : (atBot : Filter (Ioi a)).IsCountablyGenerated := by
rw [← comap_coe_Ioi_nhdsGT]
infer_instance
simp_rw [← map_coe_Ioi_atBot, tendsto_map'_iff, ← mem_Ioi, biInter_eq_iInter]
apply tendsto_measure_iInter_atBot
· rwa [Subtype.forall]
· exact fun i j h ↦ hm i j i.2 h
· simpa only [Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem measure_if {x : β} {t : Set β} {s : Set α} [Decidable (x ∈ t)] :
μ (if x ∈ t then s else ∅) = indicator t (fun _ => μ s) x := by split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
end
section OuterMeasure
variable [ms : MeasurableSpace α] {s t : Set α}
/-- Obtain a measure by giving an outer measure where all sets in the σ-algebra are
Carathéodory measurable. -/
def OuterMeasure.toMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) : Measure α :=
Measure.ofMeasurable (fun s _ => m s) m.empty fun _f hf hd =>
m.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory (fun i => h _ (hf i)) hd
theorem le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory (μ : Measure α) : ms ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure.caratheodory :=
fun _s hs _t => (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_toOuterMeasure (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) :
(m.toMeasure h).toOuterMeasure = m.trim :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : MeasurableSet s) : m.toMeasure h s = m s :=
m.trim_eq hs
theorem le_toMeasure_apply (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) (s : Set α) :
m s ≤ m.toMeasure h s :=
m.le_trim s
theorem toMeasure_apply₀ (m : OuterMeasure α) (h : ms ≤ m.caratheodory) {s : Set α}
(hs : NullMeasurableSet s (m.toMeasure h)) : m.toMeasure h s = m s := by
refine le_antisymm ?_ (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, hts, htm, heq⟩
calc
m.toMeasure h s = m.toMeasure h t := measure_congr heq.symm
_ = m t := toMeasure_apply m h htm
_ ≤ m s := m.mono hts
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_toMeasure {μ : Measure α} :
μ.toOuterMeasure.toMeasure (le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _) = μ :=
Measure.ext fun _s => μ.toOuterMeasure.trim_eq
@[simp]
theorem boundedBy_measure (μ : Measure α) : OuterMeasure.boundedBy μ = μ.toOuterMeasure :=
μ.toOuterMeasure.boundedBy_eq_self
end OuterMeasure
section
variable {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {mβ : MeasurableSpace β} [MeasurableSpace γ]
variable {μ μ₁ μ₂ μ₃ ν ν' ν₁ ν₂ : Measure α} {s s' t : Set α}
namespace Measure
/-- If `u` is a superset of `t` with the same (finite) measure (both sets possibly non-measurable),
then for any measurable set `s` one also has `μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`. -/
theorem measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq {s t u : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (h : μ t = μ u)
(htu : t ⊆ u) (ht_ne_top : μ t ≠ ∞) : μ (t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s) := by
rw [h] at ht_ne_top
refine le_antisymm (by gcongr) ?_
have A : μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) :=
calc
μ (u ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) = μ u := measure_inter_add_diff _ hs
_ = μ t := h.symm
_ = μ (t ∩ s) + μ (t \ s) := (measure_inter_add_diff _ hs).symm
_ ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + μ (u \ s) := by gcongr
have B : μ (u \ s) ≠ ∞ := (lt_of_le_of_lt (measure_mono diff_subset) ht_ne_top.lt_top).ne
exact ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right B A
/-- The measurable superset `toMeasurable μ t` of `t` (which has the same measure as `t`)
satisfies, for any measurable set `s`, the equality `μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (u ∩ s)`.
Here, we require that the measure of `t` is finite. The conclusion holds without this assumption
when the measure is s-finite (for example when it is σ-finite),
see `measure_toMeasurable_inter_of_sFinite`. -/
theorem measure_toMeasurable_inter {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (ht : μ t ≠ ∞) :
μ (toMeasurable μ t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) :=
(measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs (measure_toMeasurable t).symm (subset_toMeasurable μ t)
ht).symm
/-! ### The `ℝ≥0∞`-module of measures -/
instance instZero {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Zero (Measure α) :=
⟨{ toOuterMeasure := 0
m_iUnion := fun _f _hf _hd => tsum_zero.symm
trim_le := OuterMeasure.trim_zero.le }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : (0 : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero {_m : MeasurableSpace α} : ⇑(0 : Measure α) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_zero
[ms : MeasurableSpace α] (h : ms ≤ (0 : OuterMeasure α).caratheodory) :
(0 : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure h = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_eq_zero {ms : MeasurableSpace α}
{μ : OuterMeasure α} (h : ms ≤ μ.caratheodory) : μ.toMeasure h = 0 ↔ μ = 0 where
mp hμ := by ext s; exact le_bot_iff.1 <| (le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _).trans_eq congr($hμ s)
mpr := by rintro rfl; simp
@[nontriviality]
lemma apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
μ s = 0 := by
rw [eq_empty_of_isEmpty s, measure_empty]
instance instSubsingleton [IsEmpty α] {m : MeasurableSpace α} : Subsingleton (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ ν => by ext1 s _; rw [apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty, apply_eq_zero_of_isEmpty]⟩
theorem eq_zero_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : μ = 0 :=
Subsingleton.elim μ 0
instance instInhabited {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Inhabited (Measure α) :=
⟨0⟩
instance instAdd {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Add (Measure α) :=
⟨fun μ₁ μ₂ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd =>
show μ₁ (⋃ i, s i) + μ₂ (⋃ i, s i) = ∑' i, (μ₁ (s i) + μ₂ (s i)) by
rw [ENNReal.tsum_add, measure_iUnion hd hs, measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_add, μ₁.trimmed, μ₂.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂).toOuterMeasure = μ₁.toOuterMeasure + μ₂.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_add {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) : ⇑(μ₁ + μ₂) = μ₁ + μ₂ :=
rfl
theorem add_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (μ₁ μ₂ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(μ₁ + μ₂) s = μ₁ s + μ₂ s :=
rfl
section SMul
variable [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
variable [SMul R' ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R' ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
instance instSMul {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : SMul R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun c μ =>
{ toOuterMeasure := c • μ.toOuterMeasure
m_iUnion := fun s hs hd => by
simp only [OuterMeasure.smul_apply, coe_toOuterMeasure, ENNReal.tsum_const_smul,
measure_iUnion hd hs]
trim_le := by rw [OuterMeasure.trim_smul, μ.trimmed] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_toOuterMeasure {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) :
(c • μ).toOuterMeasure = c • μ.toOuterMeasure :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) : ⇑(c • μ) = c • ⇑μ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : R) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c • μ s :=
rfl
instance instSMulCommClass [SMulCommClass R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
SMulCommClass R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_comm _ _ _⟩
instance instIsScalarTower [SMul R R'] [IsScalarTower R R' ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsScalarTower R R' (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ _ => ext fun _ _ => smul_assoc _ _ _⟩
instance instIsCentralScalar [SMul Rᵐᵒᵖ ℝ≥0∞] [IsCentralScalar R ℝ≥0∞] {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
IsCentralScalar R (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
instance instNoZeroSMulDivisors [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] : NoZeroSMulDivisors R (Measure α) where
eq_zero_or_eq_zero_of_smul_eq_zero h := by simpa [Ne, ext_iff', forall_or_left] using h
instance instMulAction [Monoid R] [MulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : MulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.mulAction _ toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instAddCommMonoid {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddCommMonoid (Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_injective.addCommMonoid toOuterMeasure zero_toOuterMeasure add_toOuterMeasure
fun _ _ => smul_toOuterMeasure _ _
/-- Coercion to function as an additive monoid homomorphism. -/
def coeAddHom {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Measure α →+ Set α → ℝ≥0∞ where
toFun := (⇑)
map_zero' := coe_zero
map_add' := coe_add
@[simp]
theorem coeAddHom_apply {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : coeAddHom μ = ⇑μ := rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_finset_sum {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
⇑(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) = ∑ i ∈ I, ⇑(μ i) := map_sum coeAddHom μ I
theorem finset_sum_apply {m : MeasurableSpace α} (I : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(∑ i ∈ I, μ i) s = ∑ i ∈ I, μ i s := by rw [coe_finset_sum, Finset.sum_apply]
instance instDistribMulAction [Monoid R] [DistribMulAction R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : DistribMulAction R (Measure α) :=
Injective.distribMulAction ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
instance instModule [Semiring R] [Module R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
{_ : MeasurableSpace α} : Module R (Measure α) :=
Injective.module R ⟨⟨toOuterMeasure, zero_toOuterMeasure⟩, add_toOuterMeasure⟩
toOuterMeasure_injective smul_toOuterMeasure
@[simp]
theorem coe_nnreal_smul_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
(c • μ) s = c * μ s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem nnreal_smul_coe_apply {_m : MeasurableSpace α} (c : ℝ≥0) (μ : Measure α) (s : Set α) :
c • μ s = c * μ s := by
rfl
theorem ae_smul_measure {p : α → Prop} [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
(h : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x) (c : R) : ∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x :=
ae_iff.2 <| by rw [smul_apply, ae_iff.1 h, ← smul_one_smul ℝ≥0∞, smul_zero]
theorem ae_smul_measure_le [SMul R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞] (c : R) :
ae (c • μ) ≤ ae μ := fun _ h ↦ ae_smul_measure h c
section SMulWithZero
variable {R : Type*} [Zero R] [SMulWithZero R ℝ≥0∞] [IsScalarTower R ℝ≥0∞ ℝ≥0∞]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors R ℝ≥0∞] {c : R} {p : α → Prop}
lemma ae_smul_measure_iff (hc : c ≠ 0) {μ : Measure α} : (∀ᵐ x ∂c • μ, p x) ↔ ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, p x := by
simp [ae_iff, hc]
@[simp] lemma ae_smul_measure_eq (hc : c ≠ 0) (μ : Measure α) : ae (c • μ) = ae μ := by
ext; exact ae_smul_measure_iff hc
end SMulWithZero
theorem measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : μ s = μ t := by
refine le_antisymm (measure_mono h') ?_
have : μ t + ν t ≤ μ s + ν t :=
calc
μ t + ν t = μ s + ν s := h''.symm
_ ≤ μ s + ν t := by gcongr
apply ENNReal.le_of_add_le_add_right _ this
exact ne_top_of_le_ne_top h (le_add_left le_rfl)
theorem measure_eq_right_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq {s t : Set α} (h : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) (h' : s ⊆ t)
(h'' : (μ + ν) s = (μ + ν) t) : ν s = ν t := by
rw [add_comm] at h'' h
exact measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq h h' h''
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : μ (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = μ (t ∩ s) := by
refine (measure_inter_eq_of_measure_eq hs ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _) ?_).symm
· refine
measure_eq_left_of_subset_of_measure_add_eq ?_ (subset_toMeasurable _ _)
(measure_toMeasurable t).symm
rwa [measure_toMeasurable t]
· simp only [not_or, ENNReal.add_eq_top, Pi.add_apply, Ne, coe_add] at ht
exact ht.1
theorem measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_right {s t : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(ht : (μ + ν) t ≠ ∞) : ν (toMeasurable (μ + ν) t ∩ s) = ν (t ∩ s) := by
rw [add_comm] at ht ⊢
exact measure_toMeasurable_add_inter_left hs ht
/-! ### The complete lattice of measures -/
/-- Measures are partially ordered. -/
instance instPartialOrder {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : PartialOrder (Measure α) where
le m₁ m₂ := ∀ s, m₁ s ≤ m₂ s
le_refl _ _ := le_rfl
le_trans _ _ _ h₁ h₂ s := le_trans (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
le_antisymm _ _ h₁ h₂ := ext fun s _ => le_antisymm (h₁ s) (h₂ s)
theorem toOuterMeasure_le : μ₁.toOuterMeasure ≤ μ₂.toOuterMeasure ↔ μ₁ ≤ μ₂ := .rfl
theorem le_iff : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := outerMeasure_le_iff
theorem le_intro (h : ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → s.Nonempty → μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s) : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (by rintro rfl; simp) (h s hs)
theorem le_iff' : μ₁ ≤ μ₂ ↔ ∀ s, μ₁ s ≤ μ₂ s := .rfl
theorem lt_iff : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, MeasurableSet s ∧ μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <|
and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem lt_iff' : μ < ν ↔ μ ≤ ν ∧ ∃ s, μ s < ν s :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| by simp only [le_iff', not_forall, not_le]
instance instAddLeftMono {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : AddLeftMono (Measure α) :=
⟨fun _ν _μ₁ _μ₂ hμ s => add_le_add_left (hμ s) _⟩
protected theorem le_add_left (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν' + ν := fun s => le_add_left (h s)
protected theorem le_add_right (h : μ ≤ ν) : μ ≤ ν + ν' := fun s => le_add_right (h s)
section sInf
variable {m : Set (Measure α)}
theorem sInf_caratheodory (s : Set α) (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
MeasurableSet[(sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).caratheodory] s := by
rw [OuterMeasure.sInf_eq_boundedBy_sInfGen]
refine OuterMeasure.boundedBy_caratheodory fun t => ?_
simp only [OuterMeasure.sInfGen, le_iInf_iff, forall_mem_image, measure_eq_iInf t,
coe_toOuterMeasure]
intro μ hμ u htu _hu
have hm : ∀ {s t}, s ⊆ t → OuterMeasure.sInfGen (toOuterMeasure '' m) s ≤ μ t := by
intro s t hst
rw [OuterMeasure.sInfGen_def, iInf_image]
exact iInf₂_le_of_le μ hμ <| measure_mono hst
rw [← measure_inter_add_diff u hs]
exact add_le_add (hm <| inter_subset_inter_left _ htu) (hm <| diff_subset_diff_left htu)
instance {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : InfSet (Measure α) :=
⟨fun m => (sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m)).toMeasure <| sInf_caratheodory⟩
theorem sInf_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : sInf m s = sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
private theorem measure_sInf_le (h : μ ∈ m) : sInf m ≤ μ :=
have : sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) ≤ μ.toOuterMeasure := sInf_le (mem_image_of_mem _ h)
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
private theorem measure_le_sInf (h : ∀ μ' ∈ m, μ ≤ μ') : μ ≤ sInf m :=
have : μ.toOuterMeasure ≤ sInf (toOuterMeasure '' m) :=
le_sInf <| forall_mem_image.2 fun _ hμ ↦ toOuterMeasure_le.2 <| h _ hμ
le_iff.2 fun s hs => by rw [sInf_apply hs]; exact this s
instance instCompleteSemilatticeInf {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) :=
{ (by infer_instance : PartialOrder (Measure α)),
(by infer_instance : InfSet (Measure α)) with
sInf_le := fun _s _a => measure_sInf_le
le_sInf := fun _s _a => measure_le_sInf }
instance instCompleteLattice {_ : MeasurableSpace α} : CompleteLattice (Measure α) :=
{ completeLatticeOfCompleteSemilatticeInf (Measure α) with
top :=
{ toOuterMeasure := ⊤,
m_iUnion := by
intro f _ _
refine (measure_iUnion_le _).antisymm ?_
if hne : (⋃ i, f i).Nonempty then
rw [OuterMeasure.top_apply hne]
exact le_top
else
simp_all [Set.not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty]
trim_le := le_top },
le_top := fun _ => toOuterMeasure_le.mp le_top
bot := 0
bot_le := fun _a _s => bot_le }
end sInf
lemma inf_apply {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
(μ ⊓ ν) s = sInf {m | ∃ t, m = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)} := by
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s` is defined as `⊓ (t : ℕ → Set α) (ht : s ⊆ ⋃ n, t n), ∑' n, μ (t n) ⊓ ν (t n)`
rw [← sInf_pair, Measure.sInf_apply hs, OuterMeasure.sInf_apply
(image_nonempty.2 <| insert_nonempty μ {ν})]
refine le_antisymm (le_sInf fun m ⟨t, ht₁⟩ ↦ ?_) (le_iInf₂ fun t' ht' ↦ ?_)
· subst ht₁
-- We first show `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)` for any `t : Set α`
-- For this, define the sequence `t' : ℕ → Set α` where `t' 0 = t ∩ s`, `t' 1 = tᶜ ∩ s` and
-- `∅` otherwise. Then, we have by construction
-- `(μ ⊓ ν) s ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) ≤ μ (t' 0) + ν (t' 1) = μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s)`.
set t' : ℕ → Set α := fun n ↦ if n = 0 then t ∩ s else if n = 1 then tᶜ ∩ s else ∅ with ht'
refine (iInf₂_le t' fun x hx ↦ ?_).trans ?_
· by_cases hxt : x ∈ t
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨0, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· refine mem_iUnion.2 ⟨1, ?_⟩
simp [hx, hxt]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
rw [tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 0, tsum_eq_add_tsum_ite 1, if_neg zero_ne_one.symm,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_eq_zero_iff.2 _, add_zero]
· exact add_le_add (inf_le_left.trans <| by simp [ht']) (inf_le_right.trans <| by simp [ht'])
· simp only [ite_eq_left_iff]
intro n hn₁ hn₀
simp only [ht', if_neg hn₀, if_neg hn₁, measure_empty, iInf_pair, le_refl, inf_of_le_left]
· simp only [iInf_image, coe_toOuterMeasure, iInf_pair]
-- Conversely, fixing `t' : ℕ → Set α` such that `s ⊆ ⋃ n, t' n`, we construct `t : Set α`
-- for which `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)`.
-- Denoting `I := {n | μ (t' n) ≤ ν (t' n)}`, we set `t = ⋃ n ∈ I, t' n`.
-- Clearly `μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n)` and `ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`, so
-- `μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n ∈ I, μ (t' n) + ∑' n ∉ I, ν (t' n)`
-- where the RHS equals `∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)` by the choice of `I`.
set t := ⋃ n ∈ {k : ℕ | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}, t' n with ht
suffices hadd : μ (t ∩ s) + ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' n, μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) by
exact le_trans (sInf_le ⟨t, rfl⟩) hadd
have hle₁ : μ (t ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)}), μ (t' n) :=
(measure_mono inter_subset_left).trans <| measure_biUnion_le _ (to_countable _) _
have hcap : tᶜ ∩ s ⊆ ⋃ n ∈ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}, t' n := by
simp_rw [ht, compl_iUnion]
refine fun x ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ↦ mem_iUnion₂.2 ?_
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ := mem_iUnion.1 <| ht' hx₂
refine ⟨i, ?_, hi⟩
by_contra h
simp only [mem_setOf_eq, not_lt] at h
exact mem_iInter₂.1 hx₁ i h hi
have hle₂ : ν (tᶜ ∩ s) ≤ ∑' (n : {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}), ν (t' n) :=
(measure_mono hcap).trans (measure_biUnion_le ν (to_countable {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)}) _)
refine (add_le_add hle₁ hle₂).trans ?_
have heq : {k | μ (t' k) ≤ ν (t' k)} ∪ {k | ν (t' k) < μ (t' k)} = univ := by
ext k; simp [le_or_lt]
conv in ∑' (n : ℕ), μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n) => rw [← tsum_univ, ← heq]
rw [ENNReal.summable.tsum_union_disjoint (f := fun n ↦ μ (t' n) ⊓ ν (t' n)) ?_ ENNReal.summable]
· refine add_le_add (tsum_congr ?_).le (tsum_congr ?_).le
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn; simpa
· rw [Subtype.forall]
intro n hn
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hn
simp [le_of_lt hn]
· rw [Set.disjoint_iff]
rintro k ⟨hk₁, hk₂⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq] at hk₁ hk₂
exact False.elim <| hk₂.not_le hk₁
@[simp]
theorem _root_.MeasureTheory.OuterMeasure.toMeasure_top :
(⊤ : OuterMeasure α).toMeasure (by rw [OuterMeasure.top_caratheodory]; exact le_top) =
(⊤ : Measure α) :=
toOuterMeasure_toMeasure (μ := ⊤)
@[simp]
theorem toOuterMeasure_top {_ : MeasurableSpace α} :
(⊤ : Measure α).toOuterMeasure = (⊤ : OuterMeasure α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_add : ⊤ + μ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_right le_rfl
@[simp]
theorem add_top : μ + ⊤ = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| Measure.le_add_left le_rfl
protected theorem zero_le {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : 0 ≤ μ :=
bot_le
theorem nonpos_iff_eq_zero' : μ ≤ 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
μ.zero_le.le_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_eq_zero : μ univ = 0 ↔ μ = 0 :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s => (h ▸ measure_mono (subset_univ s) : μ s ≤ 0), fun h =>
h.symm ▸ rfl⟩
theorem measure_univ_ne_zero : μ univ ≠ 0 ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
measure_univ_eq_zero.not
instance [NeZero μ] : NeZero (μ univ) := ⟨measure_univ_ne_zero.2 <| NeZero.ne μ⟩
@[simp]
theorem measure_univ_pos : 0 < μ univ ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
pos_iff_ne_zero.trans measure_univ_ne_zero
lemma nonempty_of_neZero (μ : Measure α) [NeZero μ] : Nonempty α :=
(isEmpty_or_nonempty α).resolve_left fun h ↦ by
simpa [eq_empty_of_isEmpty] using NeZero.ne (μ univ)
section Sum
variable {f : ι → Measure α}
/-- Sum of an indexed family of measures. -/
noncomputable def sum (f : ι → Measure α) : Measure α :=
(OuterMeasure.sum fun i => (f i).toOuterMeasure).toMeasure <|
le_trans (le_iInf fun _ => le_toOuterMeasure_caratheodory _)
(OuterMeasure.le_sum_caratheodory _)
theorem le_sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) : ∑' i, f i s ≤ sum f s :=
le_toMeasure_apply _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s :=
toMeasure_apply _ _ hs
theorem sum_apply₀ (f : ι → Measure α) {s : Set α} (hs : NullMeasurableSet s (sum f)) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases hs.exists_measurable_subset_ae_eq with ⟨t, ts, t_meas, ht⟩
calc
sum f s = sum f t := measure_congr ht.symm
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ t_meas
_ ≤ ∑' i, f i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i ↦ measure_mono ts
/-! For the next theorem, the countability assumption is necessary. For a counterexample, consider
an uncountable space, with a distinguished point `x₀`, and the sigma-algebra made of countable sets
not containing `x₀`, and their complements. All points but `x₀` are measurable.
Consider the sum of the Dirac masses at points different from `x₀`, and `s = {x₀}`. For any Dirac
mass `δ_x`, we have `δ_x (x₀) = 0`, so `∑' x, δ_x (x₀) = 0`. On the other hand, the measure
`sum δ_x` gives mass one to each point different from `x₀`, so it gives infinite mass to any
measurable set containing `x₀` (as such a set is uncountable), and by outer regularity one gets
`sum δ_x {x₀} = ∞`.
-/
theorem sum_apply_of_countable [Countable ι] (f : ι → Measure α) (s : Set α) :
sum f s = ∑' i, f i s := by
apply le_antisymm ?_ (le_sum_apply _ _)
rcases exists_measurable_superset_forall_eq f s with ⟨t, hst, htm, ht⟩
calc
sum f s ≤ sum f t := measure_mono hst
_ = ∑' i, f i t := sum_apply _ htm
_ = ∑' i, f i s := by simp [ht]
theorem le_sum (μ : ι → Measure α) (i : ι) : μ i ≤ sum μ :=
le_iff.2 fun s hs ↦ by simpa only [sum_apply μ hs] using ENNReal.le_tsum i
@[simp]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by
simp [sum_apply_of_countable]
theorem sum_apply_eq_zero' {μ : ι → Measure α} {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet s) :
sum μ s = 0 ↔ ∀ i, μ i s = 0 := by simp [hs]
@[simp] lemma sum_eq_zero : sum f = 0 ↔ ∀ i, f i = 0 := by
simp +contextual [Measure.ext_iff, forall_swap (α := ι)]
@[simp]
lemma sum_zero : Measure.sum (fun (_ : ι) ↦ (0 : Measure α)) = 0 := by
ext s hs
simp [Measure.sum_apply _ hs]
theorem sum_sum {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum (fun (p : ι × ι') ↦ μ p.1 p.2) := by
ext1 s hs
simp [sum_apply _ hs, ENNReal.tsum_prod']
theorem sum_comm {ι' : Type*} (μ : ι → ι' → Measure α) :
(sum fun n => sum (μ n)) = sum fun m => sum fun n => μ n m := by
ext1 s hs
simp_rw [sum_apply _ hs]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_comm]
theorem ae_sum_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero
theorem ae_sum_iff' {μ : ι → Measure α} {p : α → Prop} (h : MeasurableSet { x | p x }) :
(∀ᵐ x ∂sum μ, p x) ↔ ∀ i, ∀ᵐ x ∂μ i, p x :=
sum_apply_eq_zero' h.compl
@[simp]
theorem sum_fintype [Fintype ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = ∑ i, μ i := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [sum_apply, finset_sum_apply, hs, tsum_fintype]
theorem sum_coe_finset (s : Finset ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
(sum fun i : s => μ i) = ∑ i ∈ s, μ i := by rw [sum_fintype, Finset.sum_coe_sort s μ]
@[simp]
theorem ae_sum_eq [Countable ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : ae (sum μ) = ⨆ i, ae (μ i) :=
Filter.ext fun _ => ae_sum_iff.trans mem_iSup.symm
theorem sum_bool (f : Bool → Measure α) : sum f = f true + f false := by
rw [sum_fintype, Fintype.sum_bool]
theorem sum_cond (μ ν : Measure α) : (sum fun b => cond b μ ν) = μ + ν :=
sum_bool _
@[simp]
theorem sum_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (μ : ι → Measure α) : sum μ = 0 := by
rw [← measure_univ_eq_zero, sum_apply _ MeasurableSet.univ, tsum_empty]
theorem sum_add_sum_compl (s : Set ι) (μ : ι → Measure α) :
((sum fun i : s => μ i) + sum fun i : ↥sᶜ => μ i) = sum μ := by
ext1 t ht
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ ht]
exact ENNReal.summable.tsum_add_tsum_compl (f := fun i => μ i t) ENNReal.summable
theorem sum_congr {μ ν : ℕ → Measure α} (h : ∀ n, μ n = ν n) : sum μ = sum ν :=
congr_arg sum (funext h)
theorem sum_add_sum {ι : Type*} (μ ν : ι → Measure α) : sum μ + sum ν = sum fun n => μ n + ν n := by
ext1 s hs
simp only [add_apply, sum_apply _ hs, Pi.add_apply, coe_add,
ENNReal.summable.tsum_add ENNReal.summable]
@[simp] lemma sum_comp_equiv {ι ι' : Type*} (e : ι' ≃ ι) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (m ∘ e) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simpa [hs, sum_apply] using e.tsum_eq (fun n ↦ m n s)
@[simp] lemma sum_extend_zero {ι ι' : Type*} {f : ι → ι'} (hf : Injective f) (m : ι → Measure α) :
sum (Function.extend f m 0) = sum m := by
ext s hs
simp [*, Function.apply_extend (fun μ : Measure α ↦ μ s)]
end Sum
/-! ### The `cofinite` filter -/
/-- The filter of sets `s` such that `sᶜ` has finite measure. -/
def cofinite {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} (μ : Measure α) : Filter α :=
comk (μ · < ∞) (by simp) (fun _ ht _ hs ↦ (measure_mono hs).trans_lt ht) fun s hs t ht ↦
(measure_union_le s t).trans_lt <| ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hs, ht⟩
theorem mem_cofinite : s ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ sᶜ < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem compl_mem_cofinite : sᶜ ∈ μ.cofinite ↔ μ s < ∞ := by rw [mem_cofinite, compl_compl]
theorem eventually_cofinite {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in μ.cofinite, p x) ↔ μ { x | ¬p x } < ∞ :=
Iff.rfl
instance cofinite.instIsMeasurablyGenerated : IsMeasurablyGenerated μ.cofinite where
exists_measurable_subset s hs := by
refine ⟨(toMeasurable μ sᶜ)ᶜ, ?_, (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
· rwa [compl_mem_cofinite, measure_toMeasurable]
· rw [compl_subset_comm]
apply subset_toMeasurable
end Measure
open Measure
open MeasureTheory
protected theorem _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurable {f : α → β} (h : AEMeasurable f μ) :
NullMeasurable f μ :=
let ⟨_g, hgm, hg⟩ := h; hgm.nullMeasurable.congr hg.symm
lemma _root_.AEMeasurable.nullMeasurableSet_preimage {f : α → β} {s : Set β}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hs : MeasurableSet s) : NullMeasurableSet (f ⁻¹' s) μ :=
hf.nullMeasurable hs
@[simp]
theorem ae_eq_bot : ae μ = ⊥ ↔ μ = 0 := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_ae_iff, compl_empty, measure_univ_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem ae_neBot : (ae μ).NeBot ↔ μ ≠ 0 :=
neBot_iff.trans (not_congr ae_eq_bot)
instance Measure.ae.neBot [NeZero μ] : (ae μ).NeBot := ae_neBot.2 <| NeZero.ne μ
@[simp]
theorem ae_zero {_m0 : MeasurableSpace α} : ae (0 : Measure α) = ⊥ :=
ae_eq_bot.2 rfl
section Intervals
theorem biSup_measure_Iic [Preorder α] {s : Set α} (hsc : s.Countable)
(hst : ∀ x : α, ∃ y ∈ s, x ≤ y) (hdir : DirectedOn (· ≤ ·) s) :
⨆ x ∈ s, μ (Iic x) = μ univ := by
rw [← measure_biUnion_eq_iSup hsc]
· congr
simp only [← bex_def] at hst
exact iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 hst
· exact directedOn_iff_directed.2 (hdir.directed_val.mono_comp _ fun x y => Iic_subset_Iic.2)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop [Preorder α] [NoMaxOrder α]
[(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ico a x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ (Ici a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ico_right]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop (antitone_const.Ico monotone_id)
theorem tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot [Preorder α] [NoMinOrder α]
[(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated] (μ : Measure α) (a : α) :
Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ioc x a)) atBot (𝓝 (μ (Iic a))) := by
rw [← iUnion_Ioc_left]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atBot (monotone_id.Ioc antitone_const)
theorem tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop [Preorder α] [(atTop : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Iic x)) atTop (𝓝 (μ univ)) := by
rw [← iUnion_Iic]
exact tendsto_measure_iUnion_atTop monotone_Iic
theorem tendsto_measure_Ici_atBot [Preorder α] [(atBot : Filter α).IsCountablyGenerated]
(μ : Measure α) : Tendsto (fun x => μ (Ici x)) atBot (𝓝 (μ univ)) :=
tendsto_measure_Iic_atTop (α := αᵒᵈ) μ
variable [PartialOrder α] {a b : α}
theorem Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Iio a =ᵐ[μ] Iic a := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, diff_ae_eq_self, measure_mono_null Set.inter_subset_right ha]
theorem Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioi a =ᵐ[μ] Ici a :=
Iio_ae_eq_Iic' (α := αᵒᵈ) ha
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ioc_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioc a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' (ha : μ {a} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Ico a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (ae_eq_refl _)
theorem Ioo_ae_eq_Icc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ioo a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(Ioi_ae_eq_Ici' ha).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Icc' (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Icc a b :=
(ae_eq_refl _).inter (Iio_ae_eq_Iic' hb)
theorem Ico_ae_eq_Ioc' (ha : μ {a} = 0) (hb : μ {b} = 0) : Ico a b =ᵐ[μ] Ioc a b :=
(Ioo_ae_eq_Ico' ha).symm.trans (Ioo_ae_eq_Ioc' hb)
end Intervals
end
end MeasureTheory
end
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/MeasureSpace.lean | 1,898 | 1,902 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Nicolò Cavalleri. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Nicolò Cavalleri, Andrew Yang
-/
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Derivation.ToSquareZero
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Ideal.Cotangent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.IsTensorProduct
import Mathlib.RingTheory.EssentialFiniteness
import Mathlib.Algebra.Exact
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.TensorProduct.RightExactness
/-!
# The module of kaehler differentials
## Main results
- `KaehlerDifferential`: The module of kaehler differentials. For an `R`-algebra `S`, we provide
the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.D`: The derivation into the module of kaehler differentials.
- `KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation`: The image of `D` spans `Ω[S⁄R]` as an `S`-module.
- `KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation`:
The isomorphism `Hom_R(Ω[S⁄R], M) ≃ₗ[S] Der_R(S, M)`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.quotKerTotalEquiv`: An alternative description of `Ω[S⁄R]` as `S` copies
of `S` with kernel (`KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal`) generated by the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
- `KaehlerDifferential.map`: Given a map between the arrows `R →+* A` and `S →+* B`, we have an
`A`-linear map `Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄S]`.
- `KaehlerDifferential.map_surjective`:
The sequence `Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A] → 0` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_mapBaseChange_map`:
The sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → Ω[B⁄A]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.exact_kerCotangentToTensor_mapBaseChange`:
If `A → B` is surjective with kernel `I`, then
the sequence `I/I² → B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R]` is exact.
- `KaehlerDifferential.mapBaseChange_surjective`:
If `A → B` is surjective, then the sequence `B ⊗[A] Ω[A⁄R] → Ω[B⁄R] → 0` is exact.
## Future project
- Define the `IsKaehlerDifferential` predicate.
-/
suppress_compilation
section KaehlerDifferential
open scoped TensorProduct
open Algebra Finsupp
universe u v
variable (R : Type u) (S : Type v) [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S]
/-- The kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`. -/
abbrev KaehlerDifferential.ideal : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) :=
RingHom.ker (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S)
variable {S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal (a : S) :
(1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] a - a ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) ∈ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by simp [RingHom.mem_ker]
variable {R}
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module R M] [Module S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- For a `R`-derivation `S → M`, this is the map `S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M` sending `s ⊗ₜ t ↦ s • D t`. -/
def Derivation.tensorProductTo (D : Derivation R S M) : S ⊗[R] S →ₗ[S] M :=
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift ((LinearMap.lsmul S (S →ₗ[R] M)).flip D.toLinearMap)
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul (D : Derivation R S M) (s t : S) :
D.tensorProductTo (s ⊗ₜ t) = s • D t := rfl
theorem Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul (D : Derivation R S M) (x y : S ⊗[R] S) :
D.tensorProductTo (x * y) =
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x • D.tensorProductTo y +
TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R y • D.tensorProductTo x := by
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [zero_mul, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [add_mul, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x₁ x₂
refine TensorProduct.induction_on y ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [mul_zero, map_zero, map_zero, zero_smul, smul_zero, add_zero]
swap
· intro x₁ y₁ h₁ h₂
rw [mul_add, map_add, map_add, map_add, add_smul, smul_add, h₁, h₂, add_add_add_comm]
intro x y
simp only [TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo,
TensorProduct.AlgebraTensorModule.lift_apply, TensorProduct.lift.tmul',
TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul]
dsimp
rw [D.leibniz]
simp only [smul_smul, smul_add, mul_comm (x * y) x₁, mul_right_comm x₁ x₂, ← mul_assoc]
variable (R S)
/-- The kernel of `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S` is generated by `1 ⊗ s - s ⊗ 1` as a `S`-module. -/
theorem KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal :
Submodule.span S (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· rintro x (hx : _ = _)
have : x - TensorProduct.lmul' (S := S) R x ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x := by
rw [hx, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]
rw [← this]
clear this hx
refine TensorProduct.induction_on x ?_ ?_ ?_
· rw [map_zero, TensorProduct.zero_tmul, sub_zero]; exact zero_mem _
· intro x y
have : x ⊗ₜ[R] y - (x * y) ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S) = x • ((1 : S) ⊗ₜ y - y ⊗ₜ (1 : S)) := by
simp_rw [smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
rw [TensorProduct.lmul'_apply_tmul, this]
refine Submodule.smul_mem _ x ?_
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact Set.mem_range_self y
· intro x y hx hy
rw [map_add, TensorProduct.add_tmul, ← sub_add_sub_comm]
exact add_mem hx hy
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal :
Ideal.span (Set.range fun s : S => (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)) =
KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨s, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal _ _
· change (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S ≤ (Ideal.span _).restrictScalars S
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span]
conv_rhs => rw [← Submodule.span_span_of_tower S]
exact Submodule.subset_span
/-- The module of Kähler differentials (Kahler differentials, Kaehler differentials).
This is implemented as `I / I ^ 2` with `I` the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
To view elements as a linear combination of the form `s • D s'`, use
`KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective` and `Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul`.
We also provide the notation `Ω[S⁄R]` for `KaehlerDifferential R S`.
Note that the slash is `\textfractionsolidus`.
-/
def KaehlerDifferential : Type v :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance : AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential R S) := inferInstanceAs <|
AddCommGroup (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).Cotangent
instance KaehlerDifferential.module : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential R S) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.moduleOfTower _
@[inherit_doc KaehlerDifferential]
notation:100 "Ω[" S "⁄" R "]" => KaehlerDifferential R S
instance : Nonempty (Ω[S⁄R]) := ⟨0⟩
instance KaehlerDifferential.module' {R' : Type*} [CommRing R'] [Algebra R' S]
[SMulCommClass R R' S] :
Module R' (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.module' _
instance : IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Ideal.Cotangent.isScalarTower _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower_of_tower {R₁ R₂ : Type*} [CommRing R₁] [CommRing R₂]
[Algebra R₁ S] [Algebra R₂ S] [SMul R₁ R₂]
[SMulCommClass R R₁ S] [SMulCommClass R R₂ S] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ S] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
instance KaehlerDifferential.isScalarTower' : IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S) (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
Submodule.Quotient.isScalarTower _ _
/-- The quotient map `I → Ω[S⁄R]` with `I` being the kernel of `S ⊗[R] S → S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S →ₗ[S ⊗[R] S] Ω[S⁄R] :=
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
/-- (Implementation) The underlying linear map of the derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap : S →ₗ[R] Ω[S⁄R] :=
((KaehlerDifferential.fromIdeal R S).restrictScalars R).comp
((TensorProduct.includeRight.toLinearMap - TensorProduct.includeLeft.toLinearMap :
S →ₗ[R] S ⊗[R] S).codRestrict
((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars R)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R) :
_ →ₗ[R] _)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
/-- The universal derivation into `Ω[S⁄R]`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.D : Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) :=
{ toLinearMap := KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap R S
map_one_eq_zero' := by
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply, Ideal.toCotangent_apply]
congr
rw [sub_self]
leibniz' := fun a b => by
have : LinearMap.CompatibleSMul { x // x ∈ ideal R S } (Ω[S⁄R]) S (S ⊗[R] S) := inferInstance
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply]
rw [← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← LinearMap.map_smul_of_tower (ideal R S).toCotangent,
← map_add (ideal R S).toCotangent, Ideal.toCotangent_eq, pow_two]
convert Submodule.mul_mem_mul (KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R a :)
(KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R b :) using 1
simp only [AddSubgroupClass.coe_sub, Submodule.coe_add, Submodule.coe_mk,
TensorProduct.tmul_mul_tmul, mul_sub, sub_mul, mul_comm b, Submodule.coe_smul_of_tower,
smul_sub, TensorProduct.smul_tmul', smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
ring_nf }
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_apply (s : S) :
KaehlerDifferential.D R S s =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent
⟨1 ⊗ₜ s - s ⊗ₜ 1, KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R s⟩ := rfl
theorem KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation :
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = ⊤ := by
rw [_root_.eq_top_iff]
rintro x -
obtain ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, rfl⟩ := Ideal.toCotangent_surjective _ x
have : x ∈ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S := hx
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.submodule_span_range_eq_ideal] at this
suffices ∃ hx, (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent ⟨x, hx⟩ ∈
Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) by
exact this.choose_spec
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
refine ⟨KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x, ?_⟩
apply Submodule.subset_span
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.DLinearMap_apply R S x⟩
· exact ⟨zero_mem _, Submodule.zero_mem _⟩
· rintro x y - - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩ ⟨hy₁, hy₂⟩; exact ⟨add_mem hx₁ hy₁, Submodule.add_mem _ hx₂ hy₂⟩
· rintro r x - ⟨hx₁, hx₂⟩
exact ⟨((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).restrictScalars S).smul_mem r hx₁,
Submodule.smul_mem _ r hx₂⟩
/-- `Ω[S⁄R]` is trivial if `R → S` is surjective.
Also see `Algebra.FormallyUnramified.iff_subsingleton_kaehlerDifferential`. -/
lemma KaehlerDifferential.subsingleton_of_surjective (h : Function.Surjective (algebraMap R S)) :
Subsingleton (Ω[S⁄R]) := by
suffices (⊤ : Submodule S (Ω[S⁄R])) ≤ ⊥ from
(subsingleton_iff_forall_eq 0).mpr fun y ↦ this trivial
rw [← KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h x; simp
variable {R S}
/-- The linear map from `Ω[S⁄R]`, associated with a derivation. -/
def Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential (D : Derivation R S M) : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M := by
refine LinearMap.comp ((((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) •
(⊤ : Submodule (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S))).restrictScalars S).liftQ ?_ ?_)
(Submodule.Quotient.restrictScalarsEquiv S _).symm.toLinearMap
· exact D.tensorProductTo.comp ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).subtype.restrictScalars S)
· intro x hx
rw [LinearMap.mem_ker]
refine Submodule.smul_induction_on ((Submodule.restrictScalars_mem _ _ _).mp hx) ?_ ?_
· rintro x hx y -
rw [RingHom.mem_ker] at hx
dsimp
rw [Derivation.tensorProductTo_mul, hx, y.prop, zero_smul, zero_smul, zero_add]
· intro x y ex ey; rw [map_add, ex, ey, zero_add]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply (D : Derivation R S M) (x) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x) =
D.tensorProductTo x := rfl
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp (D : Derivation R S M) :
D.liftKaehlerDifferential.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = D := by
ext a
dsimp [KaehlerDifferential.D_apply]
refine (D.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply _).trans ?_
rw [Subtype.coe_mk, map_sub, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul, Derivation.tensorProductTo_tmul,
one_smul, D.map_one_eq_zero, smul_zero, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp_D (D' : Derivation R S M) (x : S) :
D'.liftKaehlerDifferential (KaehlerDifferential.D R S x) = D' x :=
Derivation.congr_fun D'.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp x
@[ext]
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique (f f' : Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M)
(hf : f.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S) = f'.compDer (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)) :
f = f' := by
apply LinearMap.ext
intro x
have : x ∈ Submodule.span S (Set.range <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S) := by
rw [KaehlerDifferential.span_range_derivation]; trivial
refine Submodule.span_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ this
· rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩; exact congr_arg (fun D : Derivation R S M => D x) hf
· rw [map_zero, map_zero]
· intro x y _ _ hx hy; rw [map_add, map_add, hx, hy]
· intro a x _ e; simp [e]
variable (R S)
theorem Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential = LinearMap.id :=
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).liftKaehlerDifferential_comp
variable {R S}
theorem KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo (x : KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S) :
(KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo x =
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent x := by
rw [← Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_apply, Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_D]
rfl
variable (R S)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.tensorProductTo_surjective :
Function.Surjective (KaehlerDifferential.D R S).tensorProductTo := by
intro x; obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).toCotangent_surjective x
exact ⟨x, KaehlerDifferential.D_tensorProductTo x⟩
/-- The `S`-linear maps from `Ω[S⁄R]` to `M` are (`S`-linearly) equivalent to `R`-derivations
from `S` to `M`. -/
@[simps! symm_apply apply_apply]
def KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation : (Ω[S⁄R] →ₗ[S] M) ≃ₗ[S] Derivation R S M :=
{ Derivation.llcomp.flip <| KaehlerDifferential.D R S with
invFun := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential
left_inv := fun _ =>
Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_unique _ _ (Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp _)
right_inv := Derivation.liftKaehlerDifferential_comp }
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv :
(S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸ (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal ≃+*
S := by
have : Function.RightInverse (TensorProduct.includeLeft (R := R) (S := R) (A := S) (B := S))
(↑(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S) : S ⊗[R] S →+* S) := by
intro x; rw [AlgHom.coe_toRingHom, ← AlgHom.comp_apply, TensorProduct.lmul'_comp_includeLeft]
rfl
refine (Ideal.quotCotangent _).trans ?_
refine (Ideal.quotEquivOfEq ?_).trans (RingHom.quotientKerEquivOfRightInverse this)
ext; rfl
/-- The quotient ring of `S ⊗ S ⧸ J ^ 2` by `Ω[S⁄R]` is isomorphic to `S` as an `S`-algebra. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdeal :
((S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) ⧸
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal) ≃ₐ[S] S :=
{ KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S with
commutes' := (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).apply_symm_apply }
theorem KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux (f : S →ₐ[R] S ⊗ S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ ↔
(TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S := by
rw [AlgHom.ext_iff, AlgHom.ext_iff]
apply forall_congr'
intro x
have e₁ : (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift (f x) =
KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S
(Ideal.Quotient.mk (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal <| f x) := by
generalize f x = y; obtain ⟨y, rfl⟩ := Ideal.Quotient.mk_surjective y; rfl
have e₂ :
x = KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ x) :=
(mul_one x).symm
constructor
· intro e
exact (e₁.trans (@RingEquiv.congr_arg _ _ _ _ _ _
(KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S) _ _ e)).trans e₂.symm
· intro e; apply (KaehlerDifferential.quotientCotangentIdealRingEquiv R S).injective
exact e₁.symm.trans (e.trans e₂)
/- Note: Lean is slow to synthesize these instances (times out).
Without them the endEquivDerivation' and endEquivAuxEquiv both have significant timeouts.
In Mathlib 3, it was slow but not this slow. -/
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance smul_SSmod_SSmod : SMul (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Mul.toSMul _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_S_right :
IsScalarTower S (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_R_right :
IsScalarTower R (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) := Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
@[nolint defLemma]
local instance isScalarTower_SS_right : IsScalarTower (S ⊗[R] S)
(S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S ^ 2) :=
Ideal.Quotient.isScalarTower_right
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instS : Module S (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instR : Module R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- A shortcut instance to prevent timing out. Hopefully to be removed in the future. -/
local instance instSS : Module (S ⊗[R] S) (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
Submodule.module' _
/-- Derivations into `Ω[S⁄R]` is equivalent to derivations
into `(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal`. -/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' :
Derivation R S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃ₗ[R] Derivation R S (ideal R S).cotangentIdeal :=
LinearEquiv.compDer ((KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentEquivIdeal.restrictScalars S)
/-- (Implementation) An `Equiv` version of `KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux`.
Used in `KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv`. -/
def KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv :
{ f //
(Ideal.Quotient.mkₐ R (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal).comp f =
IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R S _ } ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(Equiv.refl _).subtypeEquiv (KaehlerDifferential.End_equiv_aux R S)
/--
The endomorphisms of `Ω[S⁄R]` corresponds to sections of the surjection `S ⊗[R] S ⧸ J ^ 2 →ₐ[R] S`,
with `J` being the kernel of the multiplication map `S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.endEquiv :
Module.End S (Ω[S⁄R]) ≃
{ f // (TensorProduct.lmul' R : S ⊗[R] S →ₐ[R] S).kerSquareLift.comp f = AlgHom.id R S } :=
(KaehlerDifferential.linearMapEquivDerivation R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(KaehlerDifferential.endEquivDerivation' R S).toEquiv.trans <|
(derivationToSquareZeroEquivLift (KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).cotangentIdeal_square).trans <|
KaehlerDifferential.endEquivAuxEquiv R S
section Finiteness
theorem KaehlerDifferential.ideal_fg [EssFiniteType R S] :
(KaehlerDifferential.ideal R S).FG := by
classical
use (EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S))
apply le_antisymm
· rw [Finset.coe_image, Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, _, rfl⟩
exact KaehlerDifferential.one_smul_sub_smul_one_mem_ideal R x
· rw [← KaehlerDifferential.span_range_eq_ideal, Ideal.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
let I : Ideal (S ⊗[R] S) := Ideal.span
((EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ (1 : S) ⊗ₜ[R] s - s ⊗ₜ[R] (1 : S)))
show _ - _ ∈ I
have : (IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (S ⊗[R] S) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ I)).comp TensorProduct.includeRight =
(IsScalarTower.toAlgHom R (S ⊗[R] S) (S ⊗[R] S ⧸ I)).comp TensorProduct.includeLeft := by
apply EssFiniteType.algHom_ext
intro a ha
simp only [AlgHom.coe_comp, IsScalarTower.coe_toAlgHom', Ideal.Quotient.algebraMap_eq,
Function.comp_apply, TensorProduct.includeLeft_apply, TensorProduct.includeRight_apply,
Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem]
refine Ideal.subset_span ?_
simp only [Finset.coe_image, Set.mem_image, Finset.mem_coe]
exact ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
simpa [Ideal.Quotient.mk_eq_mk_iff_sub_mem] using AlgHom.congr_fun this x
instance KaehlerDifferential.finite [EssFiniteType R S] :
Module.Finite S (Ω[S⁄R]) := by
classical
let s := (EssFiniteType.finset R S).image (fun s ↦ D R S s)
refine ⟨⟨s, top_le_iff.mp ?_⟩⟩
rw [← span_range_derivation, Submodule.span_le]
rintro _ ⟨x, rfl⟩
have : ∀ x ∈ adjoin R (EssFiniteType.finset R S).toSet,
.D _ _ x ∈ Submodule.span S s.toSet := by
intro x hx
refine adjoin_induction ?_ ?_ ?_ ?_ hx
· exact fun x hx ↦ Submodule.subset_span (Finset.mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· simp
· exact fun x y _ _ hx hy ↦ (D R S).map_add x y ▸ add_mem hx hy
· intro x y _ _ hx hy
simp only [Derivation.leibniz]
exact add_mem (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hy) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ hx)
obtain ⟨t, ht, ht', hxt⟩ := (essFiniteType_cond_iff R S (EssFiniteType.finset R S)).mp
EssFiniteType.cond.choose_spec x
rw [show D R S x =
ht'.unit⁻¹ • (D R S (x * t) - x • D R S t) by simp [smul_smul, Units.smul_def]]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (sub_mem (this _ hxt) (Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (this _ ht)))
end Finiteness
section Presentation
open KaehlerDifferential (D)
open Finsupp (single)
/-- The `S`-submodule of `S →₀ S` (the direct sum of copies of `S` indexed by `S`) generated by
the relations:
1. `dx + dy = d(x + y)`
2. `x dy + y dx = d(x * y)`
3. `dr = 0` for `r ∈ R`
where `db` is the unit in the copy of `S` with index `b`.
This is the kernel of the surjection
`Finsupp.linearCombination S Ω[S⁄R] S (KaehlerDifferential.D R S)`.
See `KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_eq` and `KaehlerDifferential.linearCombination_surjective`.
-/
noncomputable def KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal : Submodule S (S →₀ S) :=
Submodule.span S
(((Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.1 1 + single x.2 1 - single (x.1 + x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : S × S => single x.2 x.1 + single x.1 x.2 - single (x.1 * x.2) 1) ∪
Set.range fun x : R => single (algebraMap R S x) 1)
unsuppress_compilation in
-- Porting note: was `local notation x "𝖣" y => (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)`
-- but not having `DFunLike.coe` leads to `kerTotal_mkQ_single_smul` failing.
local notation3 x "𝖣" y => DFunLike.coe (KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal R S).mkQ (single y x)
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_add (x y z) : (z𝖣x + y) = (z𝖣x) + z𝖣y := by
rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)),
Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ z, ← smul_add, ← smul_sub]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inl <| Or.inl <| ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩))
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_mul (x y z) :
(z𝖣x * y) = ((z * x)𝖣y) + (z * y)𝖣x := by
rw [← map_add, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, ← map_sub (Submodule.mkQ (kerTotal R S)),
Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero]
simp_rw [← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ z, ← @smul_eq_mul _ _ z, ← Finsupp.smul_single, ← smul_add,
← smul_sub]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inl <| Or.inr <| ⟨⟨_, _⟩, rfl⟩))
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap (x y) : (y𝖣algebraMap R S x) = 0 := by
| rw [Submodule.mkQ_apply, Submodule.Quotient.mk_eq_zero, ← Finsupp.smul_single_one _ y]
exact Submodule.smul_mem _ _ (Submodule.subset_span (Or.inr <| ⟨_, rfl⟩))
theorem KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap_one (x) : (x𝖣1) = 0 := by
rw [← (algebraMap R S).map_one, KaehlerDifferential.kerTotal_mkQ_single_algebraMap]
| Mathlib/RingTheory/Kaehler/Basic.lean | 532 | 536 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Sara Rousta
-/
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Set
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrderEmbedding
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Properties of unbundled upper/lower sets
This file proves results on `IsUpperSet` and `IsLowerSet`, including their interactions with
set operations, images, preimages and order duals, and properties that reflect stronger assumptions
on the underlying order (such as `PartialOrder` and `LinearOrder`).
## TODO
* Lattice structure on antichains.
* Order equivalence between upper/lower sets and antichains.
-/
open OrderDual Set
variable {α β : Type*} {ι : Sort*} {κ : ι → Sort*}
attribute [aesop norm unfold] IsUpperSet IsLowerSet
section LE
variable [LE α] {s t : Set α} {a : α}
theorem isUpperSet_empty : IsUpperSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_empty : IsLowerSet (∅ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isUpperSet_univ : IsUpperSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem isLowerSet_univ : IsLowerSet (univ : Set α) := fun _ _ _ => id
theorem IsUpperSet.compl (hs : IsUpperSet s) : IsLowerSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
theorem IsLowerSet.compl (hs : IsLowerSet s) : IsUpperSet sᶜ := fun _a _b h hb ha => hb <| hs h ha
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_compl : IsUpperSet sᶜ ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsLowerSet.compl⟩
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_compl : IsLowerSet sᶜ ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
⟨fun h => by
convert h.compl
rw [compl_compl], IsUpperSet.compl⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.union (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.union (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∪ t) :=
fun _ _ h => Or.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsUpperSet.inter (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsUpperSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem IsLowerSet.inter (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsLowerSet (s ∩ t) :=
fun _ _ h => And.imp (hs h) (ht h)
theorem isUpperSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isLowerSet_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋃₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => Exists.imp fun _ hs => ⟨hs.1, hf _ hs.1 h hs.2⟩
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋃ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sUnion <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iUnion fun i => isUpperSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iUnion₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋃ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iUnion fun i => isLowerSet_iUnion <| hf i
theorem isUpperSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsUpperSet s) : IsUpperSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isLowerSet_sInter {S : Set (Set α)} (hf : ∀ s ∈ S, IsLowerSet s) : IsLowerSet (⋂₀ S) :=
fun _ _ h => forall₂_imp fun s hs => hf s hs h
theorem isUpperSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsUpperSet (f i)) : IsUpperSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isUpperSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isLowerSet_iInter {f : ι → Set α} (hf : ∀ i, IsLowerSet (f i)) : IsLowerSet (⋂ i, f i) :=
isLowerSet_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 hf
theorem isUpperSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsUpperSet (f i j)) :
IsUpperSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isUpperSet_iInter fun i => isUpperSet_iInter <| hf i
theorem isLowerSet_iInter₂ {f : ∀ i, κ i → Set α} (hf : ∀ i j, IsLowerSet (f i j)) :
IsLowerSet (⋂ (i) (j), f i j) :=
isLowerSet_iInter fun i => isLowerSet_iInter <| hf i
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsLowerSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff : IsUpperSet (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsLowerSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff {s : Set αᵒᵈ} : IsUpperSet (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
Iff.rfl
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.toDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.toDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_ofDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsUpperSet.ofDual⟩ := isLowerSet_preimage_toDual_iff
alias ⟨_, IsLowerSet.ofDual⟩ := isUpperSet_preimage_toDual_iff
lemma IsUpperSet.isLowerSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsUpperSet s) :
IsLowerSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.isUpperSet_preimage_coe (hs : IsLowerSet s) :
IsUpperSet ((↑) ⁻¹' t : Set s) ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t := by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, b ≤ c → b ∈ t) :
IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hbc hb ↦ ⟨hs hbc hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hbc⟩
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : ∀ b ∈ s, ∀ c ∈ t, c ≤ b → b ∈ t) :
IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
fun _b _c hcb hb ↦ ⟨hs hcb hb.1, fun hc ↦ hb.2 <| ht _ hb.1 _ hc hcb⟩
lemma IsUpperSet.sdiff_of_isLowerSet (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : IsUpperSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsLowerSet.sdiff_of_isUpperSet (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : IsLowerSet (s \ t) :=
hs.sdiff <| by aesop
lemma IsUpperSet.erase (hs : IsUpperSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a → b = a) : IsUpperSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
lemma IsLowerSet.erase (hs : IsLowerSet s) (has : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b → b = a) : IsLowerSet (s \ {a}) :=
hs.sdiff <| by simpa using has
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] [Preorder β] {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} (a : α)
theorem isUpperSet_Ici : IsUpperSet (Ici a) := fun _ _ => ge_trans
theorem isLowerSet_Iic : IsLowerSet (Iic a) := fun _ _ => le_trans
theorem isUpperSet_Ioi : IsUpperSet (Ioi a) := fun _ _ => flip lt_of_lt_of_le
theorem isLowerSet_Iio : IsLowerSet (Iio a) := fun _ _ => lt_of_le_of_lt
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ici a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsUpperSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iic a ⊆ s := by
simp [IsLowerSet, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
alias ⟨IsUpperSet.Ici_subset, _⟩ := isUpperSet_iff_Ici_subset
alias ⟨IsLowerSet.Iic_subset, _⟩ := isLowerSet_iff_Iic_subset
theorem IsUpperSet.Ioi_subset (h : IsUpperSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Ioi a ⊆ s :=
Ioi_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha
theorem IsLowerSet.Iio_subset (h : IsLowerSet s) ⦃a⦄ (ha : a ∈ s) : Iio a ⊆ s :=
h.toDual.Ioi_subset ha
theorem IsUpperSet.ordConnected (h : IsUpperSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ ha _ _ => Icc_subset_Ici_self.trans <| h.Ici_subset ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.ordConnected (h : IsLowerSet s) : s.OrdConnected :=
⟨fun _ _ _ hb => Icc_subset_Iic_self.trans <| h.Iic_subset hb⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.preimage (hs : IsUpperSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsUpperSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsLowerSet.preimage (hs : IsLowerSet s) {f : β → α} (hf : Monotone f) :
IsLowerSet (f ⁻¹' s : Set β) := fun _ _ h => hs <| hf h
theorem IsUpperSet.image (hs : IsUpperSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsUpperSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsUpperSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem IsLowerSet.image (hs : IsLowerSet s) (f : α ≃o β) : IsLowerSet (f '' s : Set β) := by
change IsLowerSet ((f : α ≃ β) '' s)
rw [Set.image_equiv_eq_preimage_symm]
exact hs.preimage f.symm.monotone
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ici (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ici a = Ici (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ici, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ici_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iic (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iic a = Iic (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ici he a
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Ioi (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsUpperSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Ioi a = Ioi (e a) := by
rw [← e.preimage_Ioi, image_preimage_eq_inter_range,
inter_eq_left.2 <| he.Ioi_subset (mem_range_self _)]
theorem OrderEmbedding.image_Iio (e : α ↪o β) (he : IsLowerSet (range e)) (a : α) :
e '' Iio a = Iio (e a) :=
e.dual.image_Ioi he a
@[simp]
theorem Set.monotone_mem : Monotone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsUpperSet s :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem Set.antitone_mem : Antitone (· ∈ s) ↔ IsLowerSet s :=
forall_swap
@[simp]
theorem isUpperSet_setOf : IsUpperSet { a | p a } ↔ Monotone p :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem isLowerSet_setOf : IsLowerSet { a | p a } ↔ Antitone p :=
forall_swap
lemma IsUpperSet.upperBounds_subset (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → upperBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
lemma IsLowerSet.lowerBounds_subset (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → lowerBounds s ⊆ s :=
fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ _b hb ↦ hs (hb ha) ha
section OrderTop
variable [OrderTop α]
theorem IsLowerSet.top_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs le_top h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs le_top ha⟩
theorem IsUpperSet.not_top_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊤ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.top_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderTop
section OrderBot
variable [OrderBot α]
theorem IsUpperSet.bot_mem (hs : IsUpperSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s = univ :=
⟨fun h => eq_univ_of_forall fun _ => hs bot_le h, fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_univ _⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∈ s ↔ s.Nonempty :=
⟨fun h => ⟨_, h⟩, fun ⟨_a, ha⟩ => hs bot_le ha⟩
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bot_mem (hs : IsLowerSet s) : ⊥ ∉ s ↔ s = ∅ :=
hs.bot_mem.not.trans not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty
end OrderBot
section NoMaxOrder
variable [NoMaxOrder α]
theorem IsUpperSet.not_bddAbove (hs : IsUpperSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddAbove s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_gt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs ((hb ha).trans hc.le) ha)
theorem not_bddAbove_Ici : ¬BddAbove (Ici a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ici _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ici
theorem not_bddAbove_Ioi : ¬BddAbove (Ioi a) :=
(isUpperSet_Ioi _).not_bddAbove nonempty_Ioi
end NoMaxOrder
section NoMinOrder
variable [NoMinOrder α]
theorem IsLowerSet.not_bddBelow (hs : IsLowerSet s) : s.Nonempty → ¬BddBelow s := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hc⟩ := exists_lt b
exact hc.not_le (hb <| hs (hc.le.trans <| hb ha) ha)
theorem not_bddBelow_Iic : ¬BddBelow (Iic a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iic _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iic
theorem not_bddBelow_Iio : ¬BddBelow (Iio a) :=
(isLowerSet_Iio _).not_bddBelow nonempty_Iio
end NoMinOrder
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α}
theorem isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, a < b → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a b : α⦄, b < a → a ∈ s → b ∈ s :=
forall_congr' fun a => by simp [le_iff_eq_or_lt, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem isUpperSet_iff_Ioi_subset : IsUpperSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Ioi a ⊆ s := by
simp [isUpperSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
theorem isLowerSet_iff_Iio_subset : IsLowerSet s ↔ ∀ ⦃a⦄, a ∈ s → Iio a ⊆ s := by
simp [isLowerSet_iff_forall_lt, subset_def, @forall_swap (_ ∈ s)]
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s t : Set α}
theorem IsUpperSet.total (hs : IsUpperSet s) (ht : IsUpperSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s := by
by_contra! h
simp_rw [Set.not_subset] at h
obtain ⟨⟨a, has, hat⟩, b, hbt, hbs⟩ := h
obtain hab | hba := le_total a b
· exact hbs (hs hab has)
· exact hat (ht hba hbt)
theorem IsLowerSet.total (hs : IsLowerSet s) (ht : IsLowerSet t) : s ⊆ t ∨ t ⊆ s :=
hs.toDual.total ht.toDual
end LinearOrder
| Mathlib/Order/UpperLower/Basic.lean | 1,373 | 1,374 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhouhang Zhou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Zhouhang Zhou, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-15")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/SetIntegral.lean | 566 | 571 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johan Commelin, Robert Y. Lewis
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Rename
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Variables
/-!
# Monad operations on `MvPolynomial`
This file defines two monadic operations on `MvPolynomial`. Given `p : MvPolynomial σ R`,
* `MvPolynomial.bind₁` and `MvPolynomial.join₁` operate on the variable type `σ`.
* `MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` operate on the coefficient type `R`.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₁ f φ` with `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`,
is the polynomial `φ(f 1, ..., f i, ...) : MvPolynomial τ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₁ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by evaluating `φ` under the map `X f ↦ f` for `f : MvPolynomial σ R`.
In other words, if you have a polynomial `φ` in a set of variables indexed by a polynomial ring,
you evaluate the polynomial in these indexing polynomials.
- `MvPolynomial.bind₂ f φ` with `f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S` and `φ : MvPolynomial σ R`
is the `MvPolynomial σ S` obtained from `φ` by mapping the coefficients of `φ` through `f`
and considering the resulting polynomial as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
- `MvPolynomial.join₂ φ` with `φ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R)` collapses `φ` to
a `MvPolynomial σ R`, by considering `φ` as polynomial expression in `MvPolynomial σ R`.
These operations themselves have algebraic structure: `MvPolynomial.bind₁`
and `MvPolynomial.join₁` are algebra homs and
`MvPolynomial.bind₂` and `MvPolynomial.join₂` are ring homs.
They interact in convenient ways with `MvPolynomial.rename`, `MvPolynomial.map`,
`MvPolynomial.vars`, and other polynomial operations.
Indeed, `MvPolynomial.rename` is the "map" operation for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair,
whereas `MvPolynomial.map` is the "map" operation for the other pair.
## Implementation notes
We add a `LawfulMonad` instance for the (`bind₁`, `join₁`) pair.
The second pair cannot be instantiated as a `Monad`,
since it is not a monad in `Type` but in `CommRingCat` (or rather `CommSemiRingCat`).
-/
noncomputable section
namespace MvPolynomial
open Finsupp
variable {σ : Type*} {τ : Type*}
variable {R S T : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S] [CommSemiring T]
/--
`bind₁` is the "left hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`, operating on the variable type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and a map `f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R` taking variables
in `p` to polynomials in the variable type `τ`, `bind₁ f p` replaces each variable in `p` with
its value under `f`, producing a new polynomial in `τ`. The coefficient type remains the same.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval f
/-- `bind₂` is the "right hand side" bind operation on `MvPolynomial`,
operating on the coefficient type.
Given a polynomial `p : MvPolynomial σ R` and
a map `f : R → MvPolynomial σ S` taking coefficients in `p` to polynomials over a new ring `S`,
`bind₂ f p` replaces each coefficient in `p` with its value under `f`,
producing a new polynomial over `S`.
The variable type remains the same. This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : MvPolynomial σ R →+* MvPolynomial σ S :=
eval₂Hom f X
/--
`join₁` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₁`. Given a polynomial `p`
with coefficients in `R` whose variables are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₁ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is an algebra hom.
-/
def join₁ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval id
/--
`join₂` is the monadic join operation corresponding to `MvPolynomial.bind₂`. Given a polynomial `p`
with variables in `σ` whose coefficients are polynomials in `σ` with coefficients in `R`,
`join₂ p` collapses `p` to a polynomial with variables in `σ` and coefficients in `R`.
This operation is a ring hom.
-/
def join₂ : MvPolynomial σ (MvPolynomial σ R) →+* MvPolynomial σ R :=
eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X
@[simp]
theorem aeval_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : aeval f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) : eval₂Hom C f = bind₁ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : eval₂Hom f X = bind₂ f :=
rfl
section
variable (σ R)
@[simp]
theorem aeval_id_eq_join₁ : aeval id = @join₁ σ R _ :=
rfl
theorem eval₂Hom_C_id_eq_join₁ (φ : MvPolynomial (MvPolynomial σ R) R) :
eval₂Hom C id φ = join₁ φ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂ : eval₂Hom (RingHom.id _) X = @join₂ σ R _ :=
rfl
end
-- In this file, we don't want to use these simp lemmas,
-- because we first need to show how these new definitions interact
-- and the proofs fall back on unfolding the definitions and call simp afterwards
attribute [-simp]
aeval_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁ eval₂Hom_eq_bind₂ aeval_id_eq_join₁ eval₂Hom_id_X_eq_join₂
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (i : σ) : bind₁ f (X i) = f i :=
aeval_X f i
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_X_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (i : σ) : bind₂ f (X i) = X i :=
eval₂Hom_X' f X i
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_X_left : bind₁ (X : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) = AlgHom.id R _ := by
ext1 i
simp
variable (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R)
theorem bind₁_C_right (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (x) : bind₁ f (C x) = C x := algHom_C _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_right (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (r : R) : bind₂ f (C r) = f r :=
eval₂Hom_C f X r
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_C_left : bind₂ (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = RingHom.id _ := by ext : 2 <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_comp_C (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : (bind₂ f).comp C = f :=
RingHom.ext <| bind₂_C_right _
@[simp]
theorem join₂_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₂ (map f φ) = bind₂ f φ := by simp only [join₂, bind₂, eval₂Hom_map_hom, RingHom.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₂_comp_map (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) : join₂.comp (map f) = bind₂ f :=
RingHom.ext <| join₂_map _
theorem aeval_id_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval id (rename f p) = aeval f p := by rw [aeval_rename, Function.id_comp]
@[simp]
theorem join₁_rename (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
join₁ (rename f φ) = bind₁ f φ :=
aeval_id_rename _ _
@[simp]
theorem bind₁_id : bind₁ (@id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₁ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_id : bind₂ (RingHom.id (MvPolynomial σ R)) = join₂ :=
rfl
theorem bind₁_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₁ g) (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => bind₁ g (f i)) φ := by
simp [bind₁, ← comp_aeval]
theorem bind₁_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) :
(bind₁ g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i => bind₁ g (f i) := by
ext1
apply bind₁_bind₁
theorem bind₂_comp_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T) :
(bind₂ g).comp (bind₂ f) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) := by ext : 2 <;> simp
theorem bind₂_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : (bind₂ g) (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((bind₂ g).comp f) φ :=
RingHom.congr_fun (bind₂_comp_bind₂ f g) φ
theorem rename_comp_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) :
(rename g).comp (bind₁ f) = bind₁ fun i => rename g <| f i := by
ext1 i
simp
theorem rename_bind₁ {υ : Type*} (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (g : τ → υ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (bind₁ f φ) = bind₁ (fun i => rename g <| f i) φ :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (rename_comp_bind₁ f g) φ
theorem map_bind₂ (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (g : S →+* T) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map g (bind₂ f φ) = bind₂ ((map g).comp f) φ := by
simp only [bind₂, eval₂_comp_right, coe_eval₂Hom, eval₂_map]
congr 1 with : 1
simp only [Function.comp_apply, map_X]
theorem bind₁_comp_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) :
(bind₁ f).comp (rename g) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) := by
ext1 i
simp
theorem bind₁_rename {υ : Type*} (f : τ → MvPolynomial υ R) (g : σ → τ) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
bind₁ f (rename g φ) = bind₁ (f ∘ g) φ :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (bind₁_comp_rename f g) φ
theorem bind₂_map (f : S →+* MvPolynomial σ T) (g : R →+* S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
bind₂ f (map g φ) = bind₂ (f.comp g) φ := by simp [bind₂]
@[simp]
theorem map_comp_C (f : R →+* S) : (map f).comp (C : R →+* MvPolynomial σ R) = C.comp f := by
ext1
apply map_C
-- mixing the two monad structures
theorem hom_bind₁ (f : MvPolynomial τ R →+* S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
f (bind₁ g φ) = eval₂Hom (f.comp C) (fun i => f (g i)) φ := by
rw [bind₁, map_aeval, algebraMap_eq]
theorem map_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (bind₁ g φ) = bind₁ (fun i : σ => (map f) (g i)) (map f φ) := by
rw [hom_bind₁, map_comp_C, ← eval₂Hom_map_hom]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem eval₂Hom_comp_C (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → S) : (eval₂Hom f g).comp C = f := by
ext1 r
exact eval₂_C f g r
theorem eval₂Hom_bind₁ (f : R →+* S) (g : τ → S) (h : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
eval₂Hom f g (bind₁ h φ) = eval₂Hom f (fun i => eval₂Hom f g (h i)) φ := by
rw [hom_bind₁, eval₂Hom_comp_C]
theorem aeval_bind₁ [Algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₁ g φ) = aeval (fun i => aeval f (g i)) φ :=
eval₂Hom_bind₁ _ _ _ _
theorem aeval_comp_bind₁ [Algebra R S] (f : τ → S) (g : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) :
(aeval f).comp (bind₁ g) = aeval fun i => aeval f (g i) := by
ext1
apply aeval_bind₁
theorem eval₂Hom_comp_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) :
(eval₂Hom f g).comp (bind₂ h) = eval₂Hom ((eval₂Hom f g).comp h) g := by ext : 2 <;> simp
theorem eval₂Hom_bind₂ (f : S →+* T) (g : σ → T) (h : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S)
(φ : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval₂Hom f g (bind₂ h φ) = eval₂Hom ((eval₂Hom f g).comp h) g φ :=
RingHom.congr_fun (eval₂Hom_comp_bind₂ f g h) φ
theorem aeval_bind₂ [Algebra S T] (f : σ → T) (g : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
aeval f (bind₂ g φ) = eval₂Hom ((↑(aeval f : _ →ₐ[S] _) : _ →+* _).comp g) f φ :=
eval₂Hom_bind₂ _ _ _ _
alias eval₂Hom_C_left := eval₂Hom_C_eq_bind₁
theorem bind₁_monomial (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₁ f (monomial d r) = C r * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i := by
simp only [monomial_eq, map_mul, bind₁_C_right, Finsupp.prod, map_prod,
map_pow, bind₁_X_right]
theorem bind₂_monomial (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
bind₂ f (monomial d r) = f r * monomial d 1 := by
simp only [monomial_eq, RingHom.map_mul, bind₂_C_right, Finsupp.prod, map_prod,
map_pow, bind₂_X_right, C_1, one_mul]
@[simp]
theorem bind₂_monomial_one (f : R →+* MvPolynomial σ S) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) :
bind₂ f (monomial d 1) = monomial d 1 := by rw [bind₂_monomial, f.map_one, one_mul]
section
theorem vars_bind₁ [DecidableEq τ] (f : σ → MvPolynomial τ R) (φ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
(bind₁ f φ).vars ⊆ φ.vars.biUnion fun i => (f i).vars := by
calc (bind₁ f φ).vars
_ = (φ.support.sum fun x : σ →₀ ℕ => (bind₁ f) (monomial x (coeff x φ))).vars := by
rw [← map_sum, ← φ.as_sum]
_ ≤ φ.support.biUnion fun i : σ →₀ ℕ => ((bind₁ f) (monomial i (coeff i φ))).vars :=
(vars_sum_subset _ _)
_ = φ.support.biUnion fun d : σ →₀ ℕ => vars (C (coeff d φ) * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i) := by
simp only [bind₁_monomial]
_ ≤ φ.support.biUnion fun d : σ →₀ ℕ => d.support.biUnion fun i => vars (f i) := ?_
-- proof below
_ ≤ φ.vars.biUnion fun i : σ => vars (f i) := ?_
-- proof below
· apply Finset.biUnion_mono
intro d _hd
calc
vars (C (coeff d φ) * ∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i) ≤
(C (coeff d φ)).vars ∪ (∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i).vars :=
vars_mul _ _
| _ ≤ (∏ i ∈ d.support, f i ^ d i).vars := by
simp only [Finset.empty_union, vars_C, Finset.le_iff_subset, Finset.Subset.refl]
_ ≤ d.support.biUnion fun i : σ => vars (f i ^ d i) := vars_prod _
_ ≤ d.support.biUnion fun i : σ => (f i).vars := ?_
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Monad.lean | 308 | 311 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Eric Rodriguez. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Rodriguez
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Units.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.BigOperators.Group.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Cast
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
/-!
# Sign function
This file defines the sign function for types with zero and a decidable less-than relation, and
proves some basic theorems about it.
-/
-- Don't generate unnecessary `sizeOf_spec` lemmas which the `simpNF` linter will complain about.
set_option genSizeOfSpec false in
/-- The type of signs. -/
inductive SignType
| zero
| neg
| pos
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
namespace SignType
instance : Zero SignType :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One SignType :=
⟨pos⟩
instance : Neg SignType :=
⟨fun s =>
match s with
| neg => pos
| zero => zero
| pos => neg⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_eq_zero : zero = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_neg_one : neg = -1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem pos_eq_one : pos = 1 :=
rfl
instance : Mul SignType :=
⟨fun x y =>
match x with
| neg => -y
| zero => zero
| pos => y⟩
/-- The less-than-or-equal relation on signs. -/
protected inductive LE : SignType → SignType → Prop
| of_neg (a) : SignType.LE neg a
| zero : SignType.LE zero zero
| of_pos (a) : SignType.LE a pos
instance : LE SignType :=
⟨SignType.LE⟩
instance LE.decidableRel : DecidableRel SignType.LE := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
instance decidableEq : DecidableEq SignType := fun a b => by
cases a <;> cases b <;> first | exact isTrue (by constructor)| exact isFalse (by rintro ⟨_⟩)
private lemma mul_comm : ∀ (a b : SignType), a * b = b * a := by rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
private lemma mul_assoc : ∀ (a b c : SignType), (a * b) * c = a * (b * c) := by
rintro ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ ⟨⟩ <;> rfl
/- We can define a `Field` instance on `SignType`, but it's not mathematically sensible,
so we only define the `CommGroupWithZero`. -/
instance : CommGroupWithZero SignType where
zero := 0
one := 1
mul := (· * ·)
inv := id
mul_zero a := by cases a <;> rfl
zero_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_one a := by cases a <;> rfl
one_mul a := by cases a <;> rfl
mul_inv_cancel a ha := by cases a <;> trivial
mul_comm := mul_comm
mul_assoc := mul_assoc
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, by rintro ⟨_⟩⟩
inv_zero := rfl
private lemma le_antisymm (a b : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ a) : a = b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> trivial
private lemma le_trans (a b c : SignType) (_ : a ≤ b) (_ : b ≤ c) : a ≤ c := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> cases c <;> tauto
instance : LinearOrder SignType where
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_refl a := by cases a <;> constructor
le_total a b := by cases a <;> cases b <;> first | left; constructor | right; constructor
le_antisymm := le_antisymm
le_trans := le_trans
toDecidableLE := LE.decidableRel
toDecidableEq := SignType.decidableEq
instance : BoundedOrder SignType where
top := 1
le_top := LE.of_pos
bot := -1
bot_le :=
#adaptation_note /-- https://github.com/leanprover/lean4/pull/6053
Added `by exact`, but don't understand why it was needed. -/
by exact LE.of_neg
instance : HasDistribNeg SignType :=
{ neg_neg := fun x => by cases x <;> rfl
neg_mul := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl
mul_neg := fun x y => by cases x <;> cases y <;> rfl }
/-- `SignType` is equivalent to `Fin 3`. -/
def fin3Equiv : SignType ≃* Fin 3 where
toFun a :=
match a with
| 0 => ⟨0, by simp⟩
| 1 => ⟨1, by simp⟩
| -1 => ⟨2, by simp⟩
invFun a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => 0
| ⟨1, _⟩ => 1
| ⟨2, _⟩ => -1
left_inv a := by cases a <;> rfl
right_inv a :=
match a with
| ⟨0, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨1, _⟩ => by simp
| ⟨2, _⟩ => by simp
map_mul' a b := by
cases a <;> cases b <;> rfl
section CaseBashing
theorem nonneg_iff {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a = 0 ∨ a = 1 := by decide +revert
theorem nonneg_iff_ne_neg_one {a : SignType} : 0 ≤ a ↔ a ≠ -1 := by decide +revert
theorem neg_one_lt_iff {a : SignType} : -1 < a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a = -1 ∨ a = 0 := by decide +revert
theorem nonpos_iff_ne_one {a : SignType} : a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≠ 1 := by decide +revert
theorem lt_one_iff {a : SignType} : a < 1 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_iff {a : SignType} : a < 0 ↔ a = -1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem le_neg_one_iff {a : SignType} : a ≤ -1 ↔ a = -1 :=
le_bot_iff
@[simp]
theorem pos_iff {a : SignType} : 0 < a ↔ a = 1 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem one_le_iff {a : SignType} : 1 ≤ a ↔ a = 1 :=
top_le_iff
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_le (a : SignType) : -1 ≤ a :=
bot_le
@[simp]
theorem le_one (a : SignType) : a ≤ 1 :=
le_top
@[simp]
theorem not_lt_neg_one (a : SignType) : ¬a < -1 :=
not_lt_bot
@[simp]
theorem not_one_lt (a : SignType) : ¬1 < a :=
not_top_lt
@[simp]
theorem self_eq_neg_iff (a : SignType) : a = -a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_eq_self_iff (a : SignType) : -a = a ↔ a = 0 := by decide +revert
@[simp]
theorem neg_one_lt_one : (-1 : SignType) < 1 :=
bot_lt_top
end CaseBashing
section cast
variable {α : Type*} [Zero α] [One α] [Neg α]
/-- Turn a `SignType` into zero, one, or minus one. This is a coercion instance. -/
@[coe]
def cast : SignType → α
| zero => 0
| pos => 1
| neg => -1
/-- This is a `CoeTail` since the type on the right (trivially) determines the type on the left.
`outParam`-wise it could be a `Coe`, but we don't want to try applying this instance for a
coercion to any `α`.
-/
instance : CoeTail SignType α :=
⟨cast⟩
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with functions preserving `0, 1, -1`. -/
lemma map_cast' {β : Type*} [One β] [Neg β] [Zero β]
(f : α → β) (h₁ : f 1 = 1) (h₂ : f 0 = 0) (h₃ : f (-1) = -1) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
cases s <;> simp only [SignType.cast, h₁, h₂, h₃]
/-- Casting out of `SignType` respects composition with suitable bundled homomorphism types. -/
lemma map_cast {α β F : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] [One β] [SubtractionMonoid β]
[FunLike F α β] [AddMonoidHomClass F α β] [OneHomClass F α β] (f : F) (s : SignType) :
f s = s := by
apply map_cast' <;> simp
@[simp]
theorem coe_zero : ↑(0 : SignType) = (0 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_one : ↑(1 : SignType) = (1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_neg_one : ↑(-1 : SignType) = (-1 : α) :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_neg {α : Type*} [One α] [SubtractionMonoid α] (s : SignType) :
(↑(-s) : α) = -↑s := by
cases s <;> simp
/-- Casting `SignType → ℤ → α` is the same as casting directly `SignType → α`. -/
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma intCast_cast {α : Type*} [AddGroupWithOne α] (s : SignType) : ((s : ℤ) : α) = s :=
map_cast' _ Int.cast_one Int.cast_zero (@Int.cast_one α _ ▸ Int.cast_neg 1) _
end cast
/-- `SignType.cast` as a `MulWithZeroHom`. -/
@[simps]
def castHom {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] : SignType →*₀ α where
toFun := cast
map_zero' := rfl
map_one' := rfl
map_mul' x y := by cases x <;> cases y <;> simp [zero_eq_zero, pos_eq_one, neg_eq_neg_one]
theorem univ_eq : (Finset.univ : Finset SignType) = {0, -1, 1} := by
decide
theorem range_eq {α} (f : SignType → α) : Set.range f = {f zero, f neg, f pos} := by
classical rw [← Fintype.coe_image_univ, univ_eq]
classical simp [Finset.coe_insert]
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_mul {α} [MulZeroOneClass α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a b : SignType) :
↑(a * b) = (a : α) * b :=
map_mul SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_pow {α} [MonoidWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℕ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_pow SignType.castHom _ _
@[simp, norm_cast] lemma coe_zpow {α} [GroupWithZero α] [HasDistribNeg α] (a : SignType) (k : ℤ) :
↑(a ^ k) = (a : α) ^ k :=
map_zpow₀ SignType.castHom _ _
end SignType
-- The lemma `exists_signed_sum` needs explicit universe handling in its statement.
universe u
variable {α : Type u}
open SignType
section Preorder
variable [Zero α] [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α] {a : α}
/-- The sign of an element is 1 if it's positive, -1 if negative, 0 otherwise. -/
def SignType.sign : α →o SignType :=
⟨fun a => if 0 < a then 1 else if a < 0 then -1 else 0, fun a b h => by
dsimp
split_ifs with h₁ h₂ h₃ h₄ _ _ h₂ h₃ <;> try constructor
· cases lt_irrefl 0 (h₁.trans <| h.trans_lt h₃)
· cases h₂ (h₁.trans_le h)
· cases h₄ (h.trans_lt h₃)⟩
theorem sign_apply : sign a = ite (0 < a) 1 (ite (a < 0) (-1) 0) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sign_zero : sign (0 : α) = 0 := by simp [sign_apply]
@[simp]
theorem sign_pos (ha : 0 < a) : sign a = 1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_pos]
@[simp]
theorem sign_neg (ha : a < 0) : sign a = -1 := by rwa [sign_apply, if_neg <| asymm ha, if_pos]
theorem sign_eq_one_iff : sign a = 1 ↔ 0 < a := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_pos h⟩
by_contra hn
rw [sign_apply, if_neg hn] at h
split_ifs at h
theorem sign_eq_neg_one_iff : sign a = -1 ↔ a < 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => sign_neg h⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h
assumption
end Preorder
section LinearOrder
variable [Zero α] [LinearOrder α] {a : α}
/-- `SignType.sign` respects strictly monotone zero-preserving maps. -/
lemma StrictMono.sign_comp {β F : Type*} [Zero β] [Preorder β] [DecidableLT β]
[FunLike F α β] [ZeroHomClass F α β] {f : F} (hf : StrictMono f) (a : α) :
sign (f a) = sign a := by
simp only [sign_apply, ← map_zero f, hf.lt_iff_lt]
@[simp]
theorem sign_eq_zero_iff : sign a = 0 ↔ a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => h.symm ▸ sign_zero⟩
rw [sign_apply] at h
split_ifs at h with h_1 h_2
cases h
exact (le_of_not_lt h_1).eq_of_not_lt h_2
theorem sign_ne_zero : sign a ≠ 0 ↔ a ≠ 0 :=
sign_eq_zero_iff.not
@[simp]
theorem sign_nonneg_iff : 0 ≤ sign a ↔ 0 ≤ a := by
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 a with (h | h | h)
· simp [h, h.le]
· simp [← h]
· simp [h, h.not_le]
@[simp]
theorem sign_nonpos_iff : sign a ≤ 0 ↔ a ≤ 0 := by
rcases lt_trichotomy 0 a with (h | h | h)
· simp [h, h.not_le]
· simp [← h]
· simp [h, h.le]
end LinearOrder
section OrderedSemiring
variable [Semiring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α] [DecidableLT α] [Nontrivial α]
theorem sign_one : sign (1 : α) = 1 :=
sign_pos zero_lt_one
end OrderedSemiring
section OrderedRing
@[simp]
lemma sign_intCast {α : Type*} [Ring α] [PartialOrder α] [IsOrderedRing α]
[Nontrivial α] [DecidableLT α] (n : ℤ) :
sign (n : α) = sign n := by
simp only [sign_apply, Int.cast_pos, Int.cast_lt_zero]
end OrderedRing
section LinearOrderedRing
variable [Ring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α]
theorem sign_mul (x y : α) : sign (x * y) = sign x * sign y := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with (hx | hx | hx) <;> rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (hy | hy | hy) <;>
simp [hx, hy, mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
@[simp] theorem sign_mul_abs (x : α) : (sign x * |x| : α) = x := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with hx | rfl | hx <;> simp [*, abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg]
@[simp] theorem abs_mul_sign (x : α) : (|x| * sign x : α) = x := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with hx | rfl | hx <;> simp [*, abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem sign_mul_self (x : α) : sign x * x = |x| := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with hx | rfl | hx <;> simp [*, abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem self_mul_sign (x : α) : x * sign x = |x| := by
rcases lt_trichotomy x 0 with hx | rfl | hx <;> simp [*, abs_of_pos, abs_of_neg]
/-- `SignType.sign` as a `MonoidWithZeroHom` for a nontrivial ordered semiring. Note that linearity
is required; consider ℂ with the order `z ≤ w` iff they have the same imaginary part and
`z - w ≤ 0` in the reals; then `1 + I` and `1 - I` are incomparable to zero, and thus we have:
`0 * 0 = SignType.sign (1 + I) * SignType.sign (1 - I) ≠ SignType.sign 2 = 1`.
(`Complex.orderedCommRing`) -/
def signHom : α →*₀ SignType where
toFun := sign
map_zero' := sign_zero
map_one' := sign_one
map_mul' := sign_mul
theorem sign_pow (x : α) (n : ℕ) : sign (x ^ n) = sign x ^ n := map_pow signHom x n
end LinearOrderedRing
| section AddGroup
variable [AddGroup α] [Preorder α] [DecidableLT α]
theorem Left.sign_neg [AddLeftStrictMono α] (a : α) : sign (-a) = -sign a := by
| Mathlib/Data/Sign.lean | 427 | 431 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.AddCircle
import Mathlib.Analysis.Fourier.FourierTransform
import Mathlib.Analysis.PSeries
import Mathlib.Analysis.Distribution.FourierSchwartz
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Lebesgue.Integral
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousMap.Periodic
/-!
# Poisson's summation formula
We prove Poisson's summation formula `∑ (n : ℤ), f n = ∑ (n : ℤ), 𝓕 f n`, where `𝓕 f` is the
Fourier transform of `f`, under the following hypotheses:
* `f` is a continuous function `ℝ → ℂ`.
* The sum `∑ (n : ℤ), 𝓕 f n` is convergent.
* For all compacts `K ⊂ ℝ`, the sum `∑ (n : ℤ), sup { ‖f(x + n)‖ | x ∈ K }` is convergent.
See `Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral` for this formulation.
These hypotheses are potentially a little awkward to apply, so we also provide the less general but
easier-to-use result `Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral_of_rpow_decay`, in which we assume `f` and
`𝓕 f` both decay as `|x| ^ (-b)` for some `b > 1`, and the even more specific result
`SchwartzMap.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral`, where we assume that both `f` and `𝓕 f` are Schwartz
functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Function hiding comp_apply
open Set hiding restrict_apply
open Complex hiding abs_of_nonneg
open Real
open TopologicalSpace Filter MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Real Filter FourierTransform
open ContinuousMap
/-- The key lemma for Poisson summation: the `m`-th Fourier coefficient of the periodic function
`∑' n : ℤ, f (x + n)` is the value at `m` of the Fourier transform of `f`. -/
theorem Real.fourierCoeff_tsum_comp_add {f : C(ℝ, ℂ)}
(hf : ∀ K : Compacts ℝ, Summable fun n : ℤ => ‖(f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n)).restrict K‖)
(m : ℤ) : fourierCoeff (Periodic.lift <| f.periodic_tsum_comp_add_zsmul 1) m = 𝓕 f m := by
-- NB: This proof can be shortened somewhat by telescoping together some of the steps in the calc
-- block, but I think it's more legible this way. We start with preliminaries about the integrand.
let e : C(ℝ, ℂ) := (fourier (-m)).comp ⟨((↑) : ℝ → UnitAddCircle), continuous_quotient_mk'⟩
have neK : ∀ (K : Compacts ℝ) (g : C(ℝ, ℂ)), ‖(e * g).restrict K‖ = ‖g.restrict K‖ := by
have (x : ℝ) : ‖e x‖ = 1 := (AddCircle.toCircle (-m • x)).norm_coe
intro K g
simp_rw [norm_eq_iSup_norm, restrict_apply, mul_apply, norm_mul, this, one_mul]
have eadd : ∀ (n : ℤ), e.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n) = e := by
intro n; ext1 x
have : Periodic e 1 := Periodic.comp (fun x => AddCircle.coe_add_period 1 x) (fourier (-m))
simpa only [mul_one] using this.int_mul n x
-- Now the main argument. First unwind some definitions.
calc
fourierCoeff (Periodic.lift <| f.periodic_tsum_comp_add_zsmul 1) m =
∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..1, e x * (∑' n : ℤ, f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n)) x := by
simp_rw [fourierCoeff_eq_intervalIntegral _ m 0, div_one, one_smul, zero_add, e, comp_apply,
coe_mk, Periodic.lift_coe, zsmul_one, smul_eq_mul]
-- Transform sum in C(ℝ, ℂ) evaluated at x into pointwise sum of values.
_ = ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..1, ∑' n : ℤ, (e * f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n)) x := by
simp_rw [coe_mul, Pi.mul_apply,
← ContinuousMap.tsum_apply (summable_of_locally_summable_norm hf), tsum_mul_left]
-- Swap sum and integral.
_ = ∑' n : ℤ, ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..1, (e * f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n)) x := by
refine (intervalIntegral.tsum_intervalIntegral_eq_of_summable_norm ?_).symm
convert hf ⟨uIcc 0 1, isCompact_uIcc⟩ using 1
exact funext fun n => neK _ _
_ = ∑' n : ℤ, ∫ x in (0 : ℝ)..1, (e * f).comp (ContinuousMap.addRight n) x := by
simp only [ContinuousMap.comp_apply, mul_comp] at eadd ⊢
simp_rw [eadd]
-- Rearrange sum of interval integrals into an integral over `ℝ`.
_ = ∫ x, e x * f x := by
suffices Integrable (e * f) from this.hasSum_intervalIntegral_comp_add_int.tsum_eq
apply integrable_of_summable_norm_Icc
convert hf ⟨Icc 0 1, isCompact_Icc⟩ using 1
simp_rw [mul_comp] at eadd ⊢
simp_rw [eadd]
exact funext fun n => neK ⟨Icc 0 1, isCompact_Icc⟩ _
-- Minor tidying to finish
_ = 𝓕 f m := by
rw [fourierIntegral_real_eq_integral_exp_smul]
congr 1 with x : 1
rw [smul_eq_mul, comp_apply, coe_mk, coe_mk, ContinuousMap.toFun_eq_coe, fourier_coe_apply]
congr 2
push_cast
ring
/-- **Poisson's summation formula**, most general form. -/
theorem Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral {f : C(ℝ, ℂ)}
(h_norm :
∀ K : Compacts ℝ, Summable fun n : ℤ => ‖(f.comp <| ContinuousMap.addRight n).restrict K‖)
(h_sum : Summable fun n : ℤ => 𝓕 f n) (x : ℝ) :
∑' n : ℤ, f (x + n) = ∑' n : ℤ, 𝓕 f n * fourier n (x : UnitAddCircle) := by
let F : C(UnitAddCircle, ℂ) :=
⟨(f.periodic_tsum_comp_add_zsmul 1).lift, continuous_coinduced_dom.mpr (map_continuous _)⟩
have : Summable (fourierCoeff F) := by
convert h_sum
exact Real.fourierCoeff_tsum_comp_add h_norm _
convert (has_pointwise_sum_fourier_series_of_summable this x).tsum_eq.symm using 1
· simpa only [F, coe_mk, ← QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero, Periodic.lift_coe, zsmul_one, comp_apply,
coe_addRight, zero_add]
using (hasSum_apply (summable_of_locally_summable_norm h_norm).hasSum x).tsum_eq
· simp_rw [← Real.fourierCoeff_tsum_comp_add h_norm, smul_eq_mul, F, coe_mk]
section RpowDecay
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
/-- If `f` is `O(x ^ (-b))` at infinity, then so is the function
`fun x ↦ ‖f.restrict (Icc (x + R) (x + S))‖` for any fixed `R` and `S`. -/
theorem isBigO_norm_Icc_restrict_atTop {f : C(ℝ, E)} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b)
(hf : f =O[atTop] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b)) (R S : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => ‖f.restrict (Icc (x + R) (x + S))‖) =O[atTop] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b) := by
-- First establish an explicit estimate on decay of inverse powers.
-- This is logically independent of the rest of the proof, but of no mathematical interest in
-- itself, so it is proved in-line rather than being formulated as a separate lemma.
have claim : ∀ x : ℝ, max 0 (-2 * R) < x → ∀ y : ℝ, x + R ≤ y →
y ^ (-b) ≤ (1 / 2) ^ (-b) * x ^ (-b) := fun x hx y hy ↦ by
rw [max_lt_iff] at hx
obtain ⟨hx1, hx2⟩ := hx
rw [← mul_rpow] <;> try positivity
apply rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos <;> linarith
-- Now the main proof.
obtain ⟨c, hc, hc'⟩ := hf.exists_pos
simp only [IsBigO, IsBigOWith, eventually_atTop] at hc' ⊢
obtain ⟨d, hd⟩ := hc'
refine ⟨c * (1 / 2) ^ (-b), ⟨max (1 + max 0 (-2 * R)) (d - R), fun x hx => ?_⟩⟩
rw [ge_iff_le, max_le_iff] at hx
have hx' : max 0 (-2 * R) < x := by linarith
rw [max_lt_iff] at hx'
rw [norm_norm, ContinuousMap.norm_le _ (by positivity)]
refine fun y => (hd y.1 (by linarith [hx.1, y.2.1])).trans ?_
have A : ∀ x : ℝ, 0 ≤ |x| ^ (-b) := fun x => by positivity
rw [mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left hc, norm_of_nonneg (A _), norm_of_nonneg (A _)]
convert claim x (by linarith only [hx.1]) y.1 y.2.1
· apply abs_of_nonneg; linarith [y.2.1]
· exact abs_of_pos hx'.1
theorem isBigO_norm_Icc_restrict_atBot {f : C(ℝ, E)} {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b)
(hf : f =O[atBot] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b)) (R S : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => ‖f.restrict (Icc (x + R) (x + S))‖) =O[atBot] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b) := by
have h1 : (f.comp (ContinuousMap.mk _ continuous_neg)) =O[atTop] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b) := by
convert hf.comp_tendsto tendsto_neg_atTop_atBot using 1
ext1 x; simp only [Function.comp_apply, abs_neg]
have h2 := (isBigO_norm_Icc_restrict_atTop hb h1 (-S) (-R)).comp_tendsto tendsto_neg_atBot_atTop
have : (fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b)) ∘ Neg.neg = fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b) := by
ext1 x; simp only [Function.comp_apply, abs_neg]
rw [this] at h2
refine (isBigO_of_le _ fun x => ?_).trans h2
-- equality holds, but less work to prove `≤` alone
rw [norm_norm, Function.comp_apply, norm_norm, ContinuousMap.norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _)]
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
rw [ContinuousMap.restrict_apply_mk]
refine (le_of_eq ?_).trans (ContinuousMap.norm_coe_le_norm _ ⟨-x, ?_⟩)
· rw [ContinuousMap.restrict_apply_mk, ContinuousMap.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_mk,
ContinuousMap.coe_mk, neg_neg]
· exact ⟨by linarith [hx.2], by linarith [hx.1]⟩
theorem isBigO_norm_restrict_cocompact (f : C(ℝ, E)) {b : ℝ} (hb : 0 < b)
(hf : f =O[cocompact ℝ] fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b)) (K : Compacts ℝ) :
(fun x => ‖(f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight x)).restrict K‖) =O[cocompact ℝ] (|·| ^ (-b)) := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := K.isCompact.isBounded.subset_closedBall 0
rw [closedBall_eq_Icc, zero_add, zero_sub] at hr
have : ∀ x : ℝ,
‖(f.comp (ContinuousMap.addRight x)).restrict K‖ ≤ ‖f.restrict (Icc (x - r) (x + r))‖ := by
intro x
rw [ContinuousMap.norm_le _ (norm_nonneg _)]
rintro ⟨y, hy⟩
refine (le_of_eq ?_).trans (ContinuousMap.norm_coe_le_norm _ ⟨y + x, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [ContinuousMap.restrict_apply, ContinuousMap.comp_apply, ContinuousMap.coe_addRight]
· exact ⟨by linarith [(hr hy).1], by linarith [(hr hy).2]⟩
simp_rw [cocompact_eq_atBot_atTop, isBigO_sup] at hf ⊢
| constructor
· refine (isBigO_of_le atBot ?_).trans (isBigO_norm_Icc_restrict_atBot hb hf.1 (-r) r)
simp_rw [norm_norm]; exact this
· refine (isBigO_of_le atTop ?_).trans (isBigO_norm_Icc_restrict_atTop hb hf.2 (-r) r)
simp_rw [norm_norm]; exact this
/-- **Poisson's summation formula**, assuming that `f` decays as
`|x| ^ (-b)` for some `1 < b` and its Fourier transform is summable. -/
theorem Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral_of_rpow_decay_of_summable {f : ℝ → ℂ} (hc : Continuous f)
{b : ℝ} (hb : 1 < b) (hf : IsBigO (cocompact ℝ) f fun x : ℝ => |x| ^ (-b))
(hFf : Summable fun n : ℤ => 𝓕 f n) (x : ℝ) :
∑' n : ℤ, f (x + n) = ∑' n : ℤ, 𝓕 f n * fourier n (x : UnitAddCircle) :=
Real.tsum_eq_tsum_fourierIntegral (fun K => summable_of_isBigO (Real.summable_abs_int_rpow hb)
((isBigO_norm_restrict_cocompact ⟨_, hc⟩ (zero_lt_one.trans hb) hf K).comp_tendsto
Int.tendsto_coe_cofinite)) hFf x
/-- **Poisson's summation formula**, assuming that both `f` and its Fourier transform decay as
`|x| ^ (-b)` for some `1 < b`. (This is the one-dimensional case of Corollary VII.2.6 of Stein and
Weiss, *Introduction to Fourier analysis on Euclidean spaces*.) -/
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/PoissonSummation.lean | 183 | 201 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.MFDeriv.Defs
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.ContMDiff.Defs
/-!
# Basic properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative
In this file, we show various properties of the manifold Fréchet derivative,
mimicking the API for Fréchet derivatives.
- basic properties of unique differentiability sets
- various general lemmas about the manifold Fréchet derivative
- deducing differentiability from smoothness,
- deriving continuity from differentiability on manifolds,
- congruence lemmas for derivatives on manifolds
- composition lemmas and the chain rule
-/
noncomputable section
assert_not_exists tangentBundleCore
open scoped Topology Manifold
open Set Bundle ChartedSpace
section DerivativesProperties
/-! ### Unique differentiability sets in manifolds -/
variable
{𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
{E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
{H : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H] (I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H)
{M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
{H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H'] {I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'}
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{E'' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
{H'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H''] {I'' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E'' H''}
{M'' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M''] [ChartedSpace H'' M'']
{f f₁ : M → M'} {x : M} {s t : Set M} {g : M' → M''} {u : Set M'}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I univ x := by
unfold UniqueMDiffWithinAt
simp only [preimage_univ, univ_inter]
exact I.uniqueDiffOn _ (mem_range_self _)
variable {I}
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff_inter_range {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I)
((extChartAt I x) x) := Iff.rfl
theorem uniqueMDiffWithinAt_iff {s : Set M} {x : M} :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x ↔
UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 ((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ (extChartAt I x).target)
((extChartAt I x) x) := by
apply uniqueDiffWithinAt_congr
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_nhds {s t : Set M} {x : M} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds <| by simpa only [← map_extChartAt_nhdsWithin] using Filter.map_mono ht
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin {s t : Set M} {x : M}
(hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
hs.mono_nhds (nhdsWithin_le_iff.2 ht)
@[deprecated (since := "2024-10-31")]
alias UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem := UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.mono (h : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (st : s ⊆ t) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I t x :=
UniqueDiffWithinAt.mono h <| inter_subset_inter (preimage_mono st) (Subset.refl _)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter' (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (Filter.inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin ht)
theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
UniqueMDiffWithinAt I (s ∩ t) x :=
hs.inter' (nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffWithinAt (hs : IsOpen s) (xs : x ∈ s) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x :=
(uniqueMDiffWithinAt_univ I).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin <| nhdsWithin_le_nhds <| hs.mem_nhds xs
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.inter (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s) (ht : IsOpen t) : UniqueMDiffOn I (s ∩ t) :=
fun _x hx => UniqueMDiffWithinAt.inter (hs _ hx.1) (ht.mem_nhds hx.2)
theorem IsOpen.uniqueMDiffOn (hs : IsOpen s) : UniqueMDiffOn I s :=
fun _x hx => hs.uniqueMDiffWithinAt hx
theorem uniqueMDiffOn_univ : UniqueMDiffOn I (univ : Set M) :=
isOpen_univ.uniqueMDiffOn
nonrec theorem UniqueMDiffWithinAt.prod {x : M} {y : M'} {s t} (hs : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I s x)
(ht : UniqueMDiffWithinAt I' t y) : UniqueMDiffWithinAt (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) (x, y) := by
refine (hs.prod ht).mono ?_
rw [ModelWithCorners.range_prod, ← prod_inter_prod]
rfl
theorem UniqueMDiffOn.prod {s : Set M} {t : Set M'} (hs : UniqueMDiffOn I s)
(ht : UniqueMDiffOn I' t) : UniqueMDiffOn (I.prod I') (s ×ˢ t) := fun x h ↦
(hs x.1 h.1).prod (ht x.2 h.2)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (hst : s ⊆ t) (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f t x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
⟨ContinuousWithinAt.mono h.1 hst, DifferentiableWithinAt.mono
h.differentiableWithinAt_writtenInExtChartAt
(inter_subset_inter_left _ (preimage_mono hst))⟩
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f univ x ↔ MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableAt, ChartedSpace.LiftPropAt]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (ht : t ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter ht]
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter' (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f (s ∩ t) x ↔ MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x := by
rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, MDifferentiableWithinAt,
differentiableWithinAt_localInvariantProp.liftPropWithinAt_inter' ht]
theorem MDifferentiableAt.mdifferentiableWithinAt (h : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x :=
MDifferentiableWithinAt.mono (subset_univ _) (mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ.2 h)
theorem MDifferentiableWithinAt.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) : MDifferentiableAt I I' f x := by
have : s = univ ∩ s := by rw [univ_inter]
rwa [this, mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter hs, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ] at h
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mono (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f t) (st : s ⊆ t) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := fun x hx => (h x (st hx)).mono st
theorem mdifferentiableOn_univ : MDifferentiableOn I I' f univ ↔ MDifferentiable I I' f := by
simp only [MDifferentiableOn, mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, mfld_simps]; rfl
theorem MDifferentiableOn.mdifferentiableAt (h : MDifferentiableOn I I' f s) (hx : s ∈ 𝓝 x) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
(h x (mem_of_mem_nhds hx)).mdifferentiableAt hx
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableOn (h : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s :=
(mdifferentiableOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ _)
theorem mdifferentiableOn_of_locally_mdifferentiableOn
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ x ∈ u ∧ MDifferentiableOn I I' f (s ∩ u)) :
MDifferentiableOn I I' f s := by
intro x xs
rcases h x xs with ⟨t, t_open, xt, ht⟩
exact (mdifferentiableWithinAt_inter (t_open.mem_nhds xt)).1 (ht x ⟨xs, xt⟩)
theorem MDifferentiable.mdifferentiableAt (hf : MDifferentiable I I' f) :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x :=
hf x
/-!
### Relating differentiability in a manifold and differentiability in the model space
through extended charts
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter {f : M → M'} {s : Set M} {x : M} :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (writtenInExtChartAt I I' x f)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩ (extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s) ((extChartAt I x) x) := by
rw [mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff']
refine and_congr Iff.rfl (exists_congr fun f' => ?_)
rw [inter_comm]
simp only [HasFDerivWithinAt, nhdsWithin_inter, nhdsWithin_extChartAt_target_eq]
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' s ∩ range I) (extChartAt I x x) := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, ChartedSpace.liftPropWithinAt_iff']; rfl
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart. This form states smoothness of `f`
written in such a way that the set is restricted to lie within the domain/codomain of the
corresponding charts.
Even though this expression is more complicated than the one in `mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff`, it is
a smaller set, but their germs at `extChartAt I x x` are equal. It is sometimes useful to rewrite
using this in the goal.
-/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target_inter' :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm)
((extChartAt I x).target ∩
(extChartAt I x).symm ⁻¹' (s ∩ f ⁻¹' (extChartAt I' (f x)).source))
(extChartAt I x x) := by
simp only [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff']
exact and_congr_right fun hc => differentiableWithinAt_congr_nhds <|
hc.nhdsWithin_extChartAt_symm_preimage_inter_range
/-- One can reformulate smoothness within a set at a point as continuity within this set at this
point, and smoothness in the corresponding extended chart in the target. -/
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧
MDifferentiableWithinAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x := by
simp_rw [MDifferentiableWithinAt, liftPropWithinAt_iff', ← and_assoc]
have cont :
ContinuousWithinAt f s x ∧ ContinuousWithinAt (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) s x ↔
ContinuousWithinAt f s x :=
and_iff_left_of_imp <| (continuousAt_extChartAt _).comp_continuousWithinAt
simp_rw [cont, DifferentiableWithinAtProp, extChartAt, PartialHomeomorph.extend,
PartialEquiv.coe_trans,
ModelWithCorners.toPartialEquiv_coe, PartialHomeomorph.coe_coe, modelWithCornersSelf_coe,
chartAt_self_eq, PartialHomeomorph.refl_apply]
rfl
theorem mdifferentiableAt_iff_target {x : M} :
MDifferentiableAt I I' f x ↔
ContinuousAt f x ∧ MDifferentiableAt I 𝓘(𝕜, E') (extChartAt I' (f x) ∘ f) x := by
rw [← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ, ← mdifferentiableWithinAt_univ,
mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_target, continuousWithinAt_univ]
section IsManifold
variable {e : PartialHomeomorph M H} {e' : PartialHomeomorph M' H'}
| open IsManifold
theorem mdifferentiableWithinAt_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas
[IsManifold I 1 M] (he : e ∈ maximalAtlas I 1 M) (hx : x ∈ e.source) :
MDifferentiableWithinAt I I' f s x ↔
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/MFDeriv/Basic.lean | 236 | 240 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker, Devon Tuma, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.Notation
import Mathlib.Probability.Density
import Mathlib.Probability.ConditionalProbability
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Constructions
/-!
# Uniform distributions and probability mass functions
This file defines two related notions of uniform distributions, which will be unified in the future.
# Uniform distributions
Defines the uniform distribution for any set with finite measure.
## Main definitions
* `IsUniform X s ℙ μ` : A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` under `ℙ` if the
push-forward measure agrees with the rescaled restricted measure `μ`.
# Uniform probability mass functions
This file defines a number of uniform `PMF` distributions from various inputs,
uniformly drawing from the corresponding object.
## Main definitions
`PMF.uniformOfFinset` gives each element in the set equal probability,
with `0` probability for elements not in the set.
`PMF.uniformOfFintype` gives all elements equal probability,
equal to the inverse of the size of the `Fintype`.
`PMF.ofMultiset` draws randomly from the given `Multiset`, treating duplicate values as distinct.
Each probability is given by the count of the element divided by the size of the `Multiset`
## TODO
* Refactor the `PMF` definitions to come from a `uniformMeasure` on a `Finset`/`Fintype`/`Multiset`.
-/
open scoped Finset MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal
-- TODO: We can't `open ProbabilityTheory` without opening the `ProbabilityTheory` locale :(
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Measure PMF
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {E : Type*} [MeasurableSpace E] {μ : Measure E}
namespace pdf
variable {Ω : Type*}
variable {_ : MeasurableSpace Ω} {ℙ : Measure Ω}
/-- A random variable `X` has uniform distribution on `s` if its push-forward measure is
`(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s`. -/
def IsUniform (X : Ω → E) (s : Set E) (ℙ : Measure Ω) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) :=
map X ℙ = ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s
namespace IsUniform
theorem aemeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : AEMeasurable X ℙ := by
dsimp [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at hu
by_contra h
rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable h] at hu
apply zero_ne_one' ℝ≥0∞
calc
0 = (0 : Measure E) Set.univ := rfl
_ = _ := by rw [hu, smul_apply, restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ,
Set.univ_inter, smul_eq_mul, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel hns hnt]
theorem absolutelyContinuous {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : map X ℙ ≪ μ := by
rw [hu]; exact ProbabilityTheory.cond_absolutelyContinuous
theorem measure_preimage {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) {A : Set E} (hA : MeasurableSet A) :
ℙ (X ⁻¹' A) = μ (s ∩ A) / μ s := by
rwa [← map_apply_of_aemeasurable (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) hA, hu, ProbabilityTheory.cond_apply',
ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul]
theorem isProbabilityMeasure {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ :=
⟨by
have : X ⁻¹' Set.univ = Set.univ := Set.preimage_univ
rw [← this, hu.measure_preimage hns hnt MeasurableSet.univ, Set.inter_univ,
ENNReal.div_self hns hnt]⟩
theorem toMeasurable_iff {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ ↔ IsUniform X s ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
protected theorem toMeasurable {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
IsUniform X (toMeasurable μ s) ℙ μ := by
unfold IsUniform at *
rwa [ProbabilityTheory.cond_toMeasurable_eq]
theorem hasPDF {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hns : μ s ≠ 0) (hnt : μ s ≠ ∞)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : HasPDF X ℙ μ := by
let t := toMeasurable μ s
apply hasPDF_of_map_eq_withDensity (hu.aemeasurable hns hnt) (t.indicator ((μ t)⁻¹ • 1)) <|
(measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ t)⁻¹).indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s)
rw [hu, withDensity_indicator (measurableSet_toMeasurable μ s), withDensity_smul _ measurable_one,
withDensity_one, restrict_toMeasurable hnt, measure_toMeasurable, ProbabilityTheory.cond]
theorem pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E}
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) (hμs : μ s = 0 ∨ μ s = ∞) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rcases hμs with H|H
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_zero, restrict_eq_zero.mpr H,
smul_zero] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
· simp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond, H, ENNReal.inv_top, zero_smul] at hu
simp [pdf, hu]
theorem pdf_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hu : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) : pdf X ℙ μ =ᵐ[μ] s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) := by
by_cases hnt : μ s = ∞
· simp [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inr hnt), hnt]
by_cases hns : μ s = 0
· filter_upwards [measure_zero_iff_ae_nmem.mp hns,
pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top hu (Or.inl hns)] with x hx h'x
simp [hx, h'x, hns]
have : HasPDF X ℙ μ := hasPDF hns hnt hu
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hns hnt hu
apply (eq_of_map_eq_withDensity _ _).mp
· rw [hu, withDensity_indicator hms, withDensity_smul _ measurable_one, withDensity_one,
ProbabilityTheory.cond]
· exact (measurable_one.aemeasurable.const_smul (μ s)⁻¹).indicator hms
theorem pdf_toReal_ae_eq {X : Ω → E} {s : Set E} (hms : MeasurableSet s)
(hX : IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x => (pdf X ℙ μ x).toReal) =ᵐ[μ] fun x =>
(s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x).toReal :=
Filter.EventuallyEq.fun_comp (pdf_eq hms hX) ENNReal.toReal
variable {X : Ω → ℝ} {s : Set ℝ}
theorem mul_pdf_integrable (hcs : IsCompact s) (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
Integrable fun x : ℝ => x * (pdf X ℙ volume x).toReal := by
by_cases hnt : volume s = 0 ∨ volume s = ∞
· have I : Integrable (fun x ↦ x * ENNReal.toReal (0)) := by simp
apply I.congr
filter_upwards [pdf_eq_zero_of_measure_eq_zero_or_top huX hnt] with x hx
simp [hx]
simp only [not_or] at hnt
have : IsProbabilityMeasure ℙ := isProbabilityMeasure hnt.1 hnt.2 huX
constructor
· exact aestronglyMeasurable_id.mul
(measurable_pdf X ℙ).aemeasurable.ennreal_toReal.aestronglyMeasurable
refine hasFiniteIntegral_mul (pdf_eq hcs.measurableSet huX) ?_
set ind := (volume s)⁻¹ • (1 : ℝ → ℝ≥0∞)
have : ∀ x, ‖x‖ₑ * s.indicator ind x = s.indicator (fun x => ‖x‖ₑ * ind x) x := fun x =>
(s.indicator_mul_right (fun x => ↑‖x‖₊) ind).symm
simp only [ind, this, lintegral_indicator hcs.measurableSet, mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul,
Pi.one_apply, Pi.smul_apply]
rw [lintegral_mul_const _ measurable_enorm]
exact ENNReal.mul_ne_top (setLIntegral_lt_top_of_isCompact hnt.2 hcs continuous_nnnorm).ne
(ENNReal.inv_lt_top.2 (pos_iff_ne_zero.mpr hnt.1)).ne
/-- A real uniform random variable `X` with support `s` has expectation
`(λ s)⁻¹ * ∫ x in s, x ∂λ` where `λ` is the Lebesgue measure. -/
theorem integral_eq (huX : IsUniform X s ℙ) :
∫ x, X x ∂ℙ = (volume s)⁻¹.toReal * ∫ x in s, x := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul, ← integral_smul_measure]
dsimp only [IsUniform, ProbabilityTheory.cond] at huX
rw [← huX]
by_cases hX : AEMeasurable X ℙ
· exact (integral_map hX aestronglyMeasurable_id).symm
· rw [map_of_not_aemeasurable hX, integral_zero_measure, integral_non_aestronglyMeasurable]
rwa [aestronglyMeasurable_iff_aemeasurable]
end IsUniform
variable {X : Ω → E}
lemma IsUniform.cond {s : Set E} :
IsUniform (id : E → E) s (ProbabilityTheory.cond μ s) μ := by
unfold IsUniform
rw [Measure.map_id]
/-- The density of the uniform measure on a set with respect to itself. This allows us to abstract
away the choice of random variable and probability space. -/
def uniformPDF (s : Set E) (x : E) (μ : Measure E := by volume_tac) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
s.indicator ((μ s)⁻¹ • (1 : E → ℝ≥0∞)) x
/-- Check that indeed any uniform random variable has the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_eq_pdf {s : Set E} (hs : MeasurableSet s) (hu : pdf.IsUniform X s ℙ μ) :
(fun x ↦ uniformPDF s x μ) =ᵐ[μ] pdf X ℙ μ := by
unfold uniformPDF
exact Filter.EventuallyEq.trans (pdf.IsUniform.pdf_eq hs hu).symm (ae_eq_refl _)
open scoped Classical in
/-- Alternative way of writing the uniformPDF. -/
lemma uniformPDF_ite {s : Set E} {x : E} :
uniformPDF s x μ = if x ∈ s then (μ s)⁻¹ else 0 := by
unfold uniformPDF
unfold Set.indicator
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, Pi.one_apply, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
end pdf
end MeasureTheory
namespace PMF
variable {α : Type*}
open scoped NNReal ENNReal
section UniformOfFinset
/-- Uniform distribution taking the same non-zero probability on the nonempty finset `s` -/
def uniformOfFinset (s : Finset α) (hs : s.Nonempty) : PMF α := by
classical
refine ofFinset (fun a => if a ∈ s then s.card⁻¹ else 0) s ?_ ?_
· simp only [Finset.sum_ite_mem, Finset.inter_self, Finset.sum_const, nsmul_eq_mul]
have : (s.card : ℝ≥0∞) ≠ 0 := by
simpa only [Ne, Nat.cast_eq_zero, Finset.card_eq_zero] using
Finset.nonempty_iff_ne_empty.1 hs
exact ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel this <| ENNReal.natCast_ne_top s.card
· exact fun x hx => by simp only [hx, if_false]
variable {s : Finset α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {a : α}
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply (a : α) :
uniformOfFinset s hs a = if a ∈ s then (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ else 0 :=
rfl
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply_of_mem (ha : a ∈ s) : uniformOfFinset s hs a = (s.card : ℝ≥0∞)⁻¹ := by
simp [ha]
theorem uniformOfFinset_apply_of_not_mem (ha : a ∉ s) : uniformOfFinset s hs a = 0 := by simp [ha]
@[simp]
theorem support_uniformOfFinset : (uniformOfFinset s hs).support = s :=
Set.ext
(by
let ⟨a, ha⟩ := hs
simp [mem_support_iff, Finset.ne_empty_of_mem ha])
theorem mem_support_uniformOfFinset_iff (a : α) : a ∈ (uniformOfFinset s hs).support ↔ a ∈ s := by
simp
section Measure
|
variable (t : Set α)
open scoped Classical in
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Uniform.lean | 251 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.AddChar
import Mathlib.Analysis.Complex.Circle
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.Set
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.InnerProductSpace
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Haar.OfBasis
/-!
# The Fourier transform
We set up the Fourier transform for complex-valued functions on finite-dimensional spaces.
## Design choices
In namespace `VectorFourier`, we define the Fourier integral in the following context:
* `𝕜` is a commutative ring.
* `V` and `W` are `𝕜`-modules.
* `e` is a unitary additive character of `𝕜`, i.e. an `AddChar 𝕜 Circle`.
* `μ` is a measure on `V`.
* `L` is a `𝕜`-bilinear form `V × W → 𝕜`.
* `E` is a complete normed `ℂ`-vector space.
With these definitions, we define `fourierIntegral` to be the map from functions `V → E` to
functions `W → E` that sends `f` to
`fun w ↦ ∫ v in V, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ`,
This includes the cases `W` is the dual of `V` and `L` is the canonical pairing, or `W = V` and `L`
is a bilinear form (e.g. an inner product).
In namespace `Fourier`, we consider the more familiar special case when `V = W = 𝕜` and `L` is the
multiplication map (but still allowing `𝕜` to be an arbitrary ring equipped with a measure).
The most familiar case of all is when `V = W = 𝕜 = ℝ`, `L` is multiplication, `μ` is volume, and
`e` is `Real.fourierChar`, i.e. the character `fun x ↦ exp ((2 * π * x) * I)` (for which we
introduced the notation `𝐞` in the locale `FourierTransform`).
Another familiar case (which generalizes the previous one) is when `V = W` is an inner product space
over `ℝ` and `L` is the scalar product. We introduce two notations `𝓕` for the Fourier transform in
this case and `𝓕⁻ f (v) = 𝓕 f (-v)` for the inverse Fourier transform. These notations make
in particular sense for `V = W = ℝ`.
## Main results
At present the only nontrivial lemma we prove is `fourierIntegral_continuous`, stating that the
Fourier transform of an integrable function is continuous (under mild assumptions).
-/
noncomputable section
local notation "𝕊" => Circle
open MeasureTheory Filter
open scoped Topology
/-! ## Fourier theory for functions on general vector spaces -/
namespace VectorFourier
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [CommRing 𝕜] {V : Type*} [AddCommGroup V] [Module 𝕜 V] [MeasurableSpace V]
{W : Type*} [AddCommGroup W] [Module 𝕜 W]
{E F G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℂ E] [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℂ F]
[NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace ℂ G]
section Defs
/-- The Fourier transform integral for `f : V → E`, with respect to a bilinear form `L : V × W → 𝕜`
and an additive character `e`. -/
def fourierIntegral (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V) (L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E)
(w : W) : E :=
∫ v, e (-L v w) • f v ∂μ
theorem fourierIntegral_const_smul (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (r : ℂ) :
fourierIntegral e μ L (r • f) = r • fourierIntegral e μ L f := by
| ext1 w
simp only [Pi.smul_apply, fourierIntegral, smul_comm _ r, integral_smul]
/-- The uniform norm of the Fourier integral of `f` is bounded by the `L¹` norm of `f`. -/
theorem norm_fourierIntegral_le_integral_norm (e : AddChar 𝕜 𝕊) (μ : Measure V)
(L : V →ₗ[𝕜] W →ₗ[𝕜] 𝕜) (f : V → E) (w : W) :
‖fourierIntegral e μ L f w‖ ≤ ∫ v : V, ‖f v‖ ∂μ := by
refine (norm_integral_le_integral_norm _).trans (le_of_eq ?_)
simp_rw [Circle.norm_smul]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Fourier/FourierTransform.lean | 84 | 92 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Loeffler. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.ImproperIntegrals
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.ExpDecay
/-!
# The Gamma function
This file defines the `Γ` function (of a real or complex variable `s`). We define this by Euler's
integral `Γ(s) = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)` in the range where this integral converges
(i.e., for `0 < s` in the real case, and `0 < re s` in the complex case).
We show that this integral satisfies `Γ(1) = 1` and `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)`; hence we can define
`Γ(s)` for all `s` as the unique function satisfying this recurrence and agreeing with Euler's
integral in the convergence range. (If `s = -n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, then the function is undefined, and we
set it to be `0` by convention.)
## Gamma function: main statements (complex case)
* `Complex.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a complex variable).
* `Complex.Gamma_eq_integral`: for `0 < re s`, `Γ(s)` agrees with Euler's integral.
* `Complex.Gamma_add_one`: for all `s : ℂ` with `s ≠ 0`, we have `Γ (s + 1) = s Γ(s)`.
* `Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`: for all `n : ℕ` we have `Γ (n + 1) = n!`.
## Gamma function: main statements (real case)
* `Real.Gamma`: the `Γ` function (of a real variable).
* Real counterparts of all the properties of the complex Gamma function listed above:
`Real.Gamma_eq_integral`, `Real.Gamma_add_one`, `Real.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial`.
## Tags
Gamma
-/
noncomputable section
open Filter intervalIntegral Set Real MeasureTheory Asymptotics
open scoped Nat Topology ComplexConjugate
namespace Real
/-- Asymptotic bound for the `Γ` function integrand. -/
theorem Gamma_integrand_isLittleO (s : ℝ) :
(fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s) =o[atTop] fun x : ℝ => exp (-(1 / 2) * x) := by
refine isLittleO_of_tendsto (fun x hx => ?_) ?_
· exfalso; exact (exp_pos (-(1 / 2) * x)).ne' hx
have : (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ s / exp (-(1 / 2) * x)) =
(fun x : ℝ => exp (1 / 2 * x) / x ^ s)⁻¹ := by
ext1 x
field_simp [exp_ne_zero, exp_neg, ← Real.exp_add]
left
ring
rw [this]
exact (tendsto_exp_mul_div_rpow_atTop s (1 / 2) one_half_pos).inv_tendsto_atTop
/-- The Euler integral for the `Γ` function converges for positive real `s`. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℝ} (h : 0 < s) :
IntegrableOn (fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) (Ioi 0) := by
rw [← Ioc_union_Ioi_eq_Ioi (@zero_le_one ℝ _ _ _ _), integrableOn_union]
constructor
· rw [← integrableOn_Icc_iff_integrableOn_Ioc]
refine IntegrableOn.continuousOn_mul continuousOn_id.neg.rexp ?_ isCompact_Icc
refine (intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Icc_of_le zero_le_one).mp ?_
exact intervalIntegrable_rpow' (by linarith)
· refine integrable_of_isBigO_exp_neg one_half_pos ?_ (Gamma_integrand_isLittleO _).isBigO
refine continuousOn_id.neg.rexp.mul (continuousOn_id.rpow_const ?_)
intro x hx
exact Or.inl ((zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1).trans_le hx).ne'
end Real
namespace Complex
/- Technical note: In defining the Gamma integrand exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) for s complex, we have to
make a choice between ↑(Real.exp (-x)), Complex.exp (↑(-x)), and Complex.exp (-↑x), all of which are
equal but not definitionally so. We use the first of these throughout. -/
/-- The integral defining the `Γ` function converges for complex `s` with `0 < re s`.
This is proved by reduction to the real case. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_convergent {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
IntegrableOn (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) (Ioi 0) := by
constructor
· refine ContinuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable ?_ measurableSet_Ioi
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
have : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) ↑x :=
continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx
exact ContinuousAt.comp this continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
· rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
refine HasFiniteIntegral.congr (Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).2 ?_
apply (ae_restrict_iff' measurableSet_Ioi).mpr
filter_upwards with x hx
rw [norm_mul, Complex.norm_of_nonneg <| le_of_lt <| exp_pos <| -x,
norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx _]
simp
/-- Euler's integral for the `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`), defined as
`∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)`.
See `Complex.GammaIntegral_convergent` for a proof of the convergence of the integral for
`0 < re s`. -/
def GammaIntegral (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in Ioi (0 : ℝ), ↑(-x).exp * ↑x ^ (s - 1)
theorem GammaIntegral_conj (s : ℂ) : GammaIntegral (conj s) = conj (GammaIntegral s) := by
rw [GammaIntegral, GammaIntegral, ← integral_conj]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
dsimp only
rw [RingHom.map_mul, conj_ofReal, cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)),
cpow_def_of_ne_zero (ofReal_ne_zero.mpr (ne_of_gt hx)), ← exp_conj, RingHom.map_mul, ←
ofReal_log (le_of_lt hx), conj_ofReal, RingHom.map_sub, RingHom.map_one]
theorem GammaIntegral_ofReal (s : ℝ) :
GammaIntegral ↑s = ↑(∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, Real.exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) := by
have : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
rw [GammaIntegral]
conv_rhs => rw [this, ← _root_.integral_ofReal]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
conv_rhs => rw [← this]
rw [ofReal_mul, ofReal_cpow (mem_Ioi.mp hx).le]
simp
@[simp]
theorem GammaIntegral_one : GammaIntegral 1 = 1 := by
simpa only [← ofReal_one, GammaIntegral_ofReal, ofReal_inj, sub_self, rpow_zero,
mul_one] using integral_exp_neg_Ioi_zero
end Complex
/-! Now we establish the recurrence relation `Γ(s + 1) = s * Γ(s)` using integration by parts. -/
namespace Complex
section GammaRecurrence
/-- The indefinite version of the `Γ` function, `Γ(s, X) = ∫ x ∈ 0..X, exp(-x) x ^ (s - 1)`. -/
def partialGamma (s : ℂ) (X : ℝ) : ℂ :=
∫ x in (0)..X, (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
theorem tendsto_partialGamma {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
Tendsto (fun X : ℝ => partialGamma s X) atTop (𝓝 <| GammaIntegral s) :=
intervalIntegral_tendsto_integral_Ioi 0 (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) tendsto_id
private theorem Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s : ℂ) {X : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s.re) (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
rw [intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hX]
exact IntegrableOn.mono_set (GammaIntegral_convergent hs) Ioc_subset_Ioi_self
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x => -((-x).exp * x ^ s) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 X := by
convert (Gamma_integrand_intervalIntegrable (s + 1) _ hX).neg
· simp only [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, add_sub_cancel_right]; rfl
· simp only [add_re, one_re]; linarith
private theorem Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {Y : ℝ} (hY : 0 ≤ Y) :
IntervalIntegrable (fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) volume 0 Y := by
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * ((-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this, intervalIntegrable_iff_integrableOn_Ioc_of_le hY]
constructor
· refine (continuousOn_const.mul ?_).aestronglyMeasurable measurableSet_Ioc
apply (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).continuousOn.mul
apply continuousOn_of_forall_continuousAt
intro x hx
refine (?_ : ContinuousAt (fun x : ℂ => x ^ (s - 1)) _).comp continuous_ofReal.continuousAt
exact continuousAt_cpow_const <| ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
rw [← hasFiniteIntegral_norm_iff]
simp_rw [norm_mul]
refine (((Real.GammaIntegral_convergent hs).mono_set
Ioc_subset_Ioi_self).hasFiniteIntegral.congr ?_).const_mul _
rw [EventuallyEq, ae_restrict_iff']
· filter_upwards with x hx
rw [Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos _).le, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx.1]
simp
· exact measurableSet_Ioc
/-- The recurrence relation for the indefinite version of the `Γ` function. -/
theorem partialGamma_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) {X : ℝ} (hX : 0 ≤ X) :
partialGamma (s + 1) X = s * partialGamma s X - (-X).exp * X ^ s := by
rw [partialGamma, partialGamma, add_sub_cancel_right]
have F_der_I : ∀ x : ℝ, x ∈ Ioo 0 X → HasDerivAt (fun x => (-x).exp * x ^ s : ℝ → ℂ)
(-((-x).exp * x ^ s) + (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1))) x := by
intro x hx
have d1 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (-y).exp) (-(-x).exp) x := by
simpa using (hasDerivAt_neg x).exp
have d2 : HasDerivAt (fun y : ℝ => (y : ℂ) ^ s) (s * x ^ (s - 1)) x := by
have t := @HasDerivAt.cpow_const _ _ _ s (hasDerivAt_id ↑x) ?_
· simpa only [mul_one] using t.comp_ofReal
· exact ofReal_mem_slitPlane.2 hx.1
simpa only [ofReal_neg, neg_mul] using d1.ofReal_comp.mul d2
have cont := (continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_neg.rexp).mul (continuous_ofReal_cpow_const hs)
have der_ible :=
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX).add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX)
have int_eval := integral_eq_sub_of_hasDerivAt_of_le hX cont.continuousOn F_der_I der_ible
-- We are basically done here but manipulating the output into the right form is fiddly.
apply_fun fun x : ℂ => -x at int_eval
rw [intervalIntegral.integral_add (Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_A hs hX)
(Gamma_integrand_deriv_integrable_B hs hX),
intervalIntegral.integral_neg, neg_add, neg_neg] at int_eval
rw [eq_sub_of_add_eq int_eval, sub_neg_eq_add, neg_sub, add_comm, add_sub]
have : (fun x => (-x).exp * (s * x ^ (s - 1)) : ℝ → ℂ) =
(fun x => s * (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ → ℂ) := by ext1; ring
rw [this]
have t := @integral_const_mul 0 X volume _ _ s fun x : ℝ => (-x).exp * x ^ (s - 1)
rw [← t, ofReal_zero, zero_cpow]
· rw [mul_zero, add_zero]; congr 2; ext1; ring
· contrapose! hs; rw [hs, zero_re]
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` integral. -/
theorem GammaIntegral_add_one {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) :
GammaIntegral (s + 1) = s * GammaIntegral s := by
suffices Tendsto (s + 1).partialGamma atTop (𝓝 <| s * GammaIntegral s) by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique ?_ this
apply tendsto_partialGamma; rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
have : (fun X : ℝ => s * partialGamma s X - X ^ s * (-X).exp) =ᶠ[atTop]
(s + 1).partialGamma := by
apply eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ici_mem_atTop (0 : ℝ))
intro X hX
rw [partialGamma_add_one hs (mem_Ici.mp hX)]
ring_nf
refine Tendsto.congr' this ?_
suffices Tendsto (fun X => -X ^ s * (-X).exp : ℝ → ℂ) atTop (𝓝 0) by
simpa using Tendsto.add (Tendsto.const_mul s (tendsto_partialGamma hs)) this
rw [tendsto_zero_iff_norm_tendsto_zero]
have :
(fun e : ℝ => ‖-(e : ℂ) ^ s * (-e).exp‖) =ᶠ[atTop] fun e : ℝ => e ^ s.re * (-1 * e).exp := by
refine eventuallyEq_of_mem (Ioi_mem_atTop 0) ?_
intro x hx; dsimp only
rw [norm_mul, norm_neg, norm_cpow_eq_rpow_re_of_pos hx,
Complex.norm_of_nonneg (exp_pos (-x)).le, neg_mul, one_mul]
exact (tendsto_congr' this).mpr (tendsto_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_atTop_nhds_zero _ _ zero_lt_one)
end GammaRecurrence
/-! Now we define `Γ(s)` on the whole complex plane, by recursion. -/
section GammaDef
/-- The `n`th function in this family is `Γ(s)` if `-n < s.re`, and junk otherwise. -/
noncomputable def GammaAux : ℕ → ℂ → ℂ
| 0 => GammaIntegral
| n + 1 => fun s : ℂ => GammaAux n (s + 1) / s
theorem GammaAux_recurrence1 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux n (s + 1) / s := by
induction' n with n hn generalizing s
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]; rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1]
rw [mul_comm, mul_div_cancel_right₀]; contrapose! h1; rw [h1]
simp
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [← hn (s + 1) hh1]
theorem GammaAux_recurrence2 (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) :
GammaAux n s = GammaAux (n + 1) s := by
rcases n with - | n
· simp only [CharP.cast_eq_zero, Left.neg_neg_iff] at h1
dsimp only [GammaAux]
rw [GammaIntegral_add_one h1, mul_div_cancel_left₀]
rintro rfl
rw [zero_re] at h1
exact h1.false
· dsimp only [GammaAux]
have : GammaAux n (s + 1 + 1) / (s + 1) = GammaAux n (s + 1) := by
have hh1 : -(s + 1).re < n := by
rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one] at h1
rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [GammaAux_recurrence1 (s + 1) n hh1]
rw [this]
/-- The `Γ` function (of a complex variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
irreducible_def Gamma (s : ℂ) : ℂ :=
GammaAux ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ s
theorem Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s : ℂ) (n : ℕ) (h1 : -s.re < ↑n) : Gamma s = GammaAux n s := by
have u : ∀ k : ℕ, GammaAux (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) s = Gamma s := by
intro k; induction' k with k hk
· simp [Gamma]
· rw [← hk, ← add_assoc]
refine (GammaAux_recurrence2 s (⌊1 - s.re⌋₊ + k) ?_).symm
rw [Nat.cast_add]
have i0 := Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
simp only [sub_sub_cancel_left] at i0
refine lt_add_of_lt_of_nonneg i0 ?_
rw [← Nat.cast_zero, Nat.cast_le]; exact Nat.zero_le k
convert (u <| n - ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊).symm; rw [Nat.add_sub_of_le]
by_cases h : 0 ≤ 1 - s.re
· apply Nat.le_of_lt_succ
exact_mod_cast lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.floor_le h) (by linarith : 1 - s.re < n + 1)
· rw [Nat.floor_of_nonpos]
· omega
· linarith
/-- The recurrence relation for the `Γ` function. -/
theorem Gamma_add_one (s : ℂ) (h2 : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
let n := ⌊1 - s.re⌋₊
have t1 : -s.re < n := by simpa only [sub_sub_cancel_left] using Nat.sub_one_lt_floor (1 - s.re)
have t2 : -(s + 1).re < n := by rw [add_re, one_re]; linarith
rw [Gamma_eq_GammaAux s n t1, Gamma_eq_GammaAux (s + 1) n t2, GammaAux_recurrence1 s n t1]
field_simp
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℂ} (hs : 0 < s.re) : Gamma s = GammaIntegral s :=
Gamma_eq_GammaAux s 0 (by norm_cast; linarith)
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by rw [Gamma_eq_integral] <;> simp
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n hn =>
rw [Gamma_add_one n.succ <| Nat.cast_ne_zero.mpr <| Nat.succ_ne_zero n]
simp only [Nat.cast_succ, Nat.factorial_succ, Nat.cast_mul]
congr
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℂ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simp_rw [Gamma, zero_re, sub_zero, Nat.floor_one, GammaAux, div_zero]
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value 0. -/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero, Gamma_zero]
| succ n IH =>
have A : -(n.succ : ℂ) ≠ 0 := by
rw [neg_ne_zero, Nat.cast_ne_zero]
apply Nat.succ_ne_zero
have : -(n : ℂ) = -↑n.succ + 1 := by simp
rw [this, Gamma_add_one _ A] at IH
contrapose! IH
exact mul_ne_zero A IH
theorem Gamma_conj (s : ℂ) : Gamma (conj s) = conj (Gamma s) := by
suffices ∀ (n : ℕ) (s : ℂ), GammaAux n (conj s) = conj (GammaAux n s) by
simp [Gamma, this]
intro n
induction n with
| zero => rw [GammaAux]; exact GammaIntegral_conj
| succ n IH =>
intro s
rw [GammaAux]
dsimp only
rw [div_eq_mul_inv _ s, RingHom.map_mul, conj_inv, ← div_eq_mul_inv]
suffices conj s + 1 = conj (s + 1) by rw [this, IH]
rw [RingHom.map_add, RingHom.map_one]
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))` in terms of the Gamma
function, for complex `a`. -/
lemma integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a : ℂ} {r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a.re) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
have aux : (1 / r : ℂ) ^ a = 1 / r * (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) := by
nth_rewrite 2 [← cpow_one (1 / r : ℂ)]
rw [← cpow_add _ _ (one_div_ne_zero <| ofReal_ne_zero.mpr hr.ne'), add_sub_cancel]
calc
_ = ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * (r * t) ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) := by
refine MeasureTheory.setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rw [mem_Ioi] at hx
rw [mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg hr.le hx.le, ← mul_assoc, one_div, ← ofReal_inv,
← mul_cpow_ofReal_nonneg (inv_pos.mpr hr).le hr.le, ← ofReal_mul r⁻¹,
inv_mul_cancel₀ hr.ne', ofReal_one, one_cpow, one_mul]
_ = 1 / r * ∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, (1 / r) ^ (a - 1) * t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t) := by
simp_rw [← ofReal_mul]
rw [integral_comp_mul_left_Ioi (fun x ↦ _ * x ^ (a - 1) * exp (-x)) _ hr, mul_zero,
real_smul, ← one_div, ofReal_div, ofReal_one]
_ = 1 / r * (1 / r : ℂ) ^ (a - 1) * (∫ (t : ℝ) in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-t)) := by
simp_rw [← MeasureTheory.integral_const_mul, mul_assoc]
_ = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [aux, Gamma_eq_integral ha]
congr 2 with x
rw [ofReal_exp, ofReal_neg, mul_comm]
end GammaDef
end Complex
namespace Real
/-- The `Γ` function (of a real variable `s`). -/
@[pp_nodot]
def Gamma (s : ℝ) : ℝ :=
(Complex.Gamma s).re
theorem Gamma_eq_integral {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) :
Gamma s = ∫ x in Ioi 0, exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.Gamma_eq_integral (by rwa [Complex.ofReal_re] : 0 < Complex.re s)]
dsimp only [Complex.GammaIntegral]
simp_rw [← Complex.ofReal_one, ← Complex.ofReal_sub]
suffices ∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ↑(exp (-x)) * (x : ℂ) ^ ((s - 1 : ℝ) : ℂ) =
∫ x : ℝ in Ioi 0, ((exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1) : ℝ) : ℂ) by
have cc : ∀ r : ℝ, Complex.ofReal r = @RCLike.ofReal ℂ _ r := fun r => rfl
conv_lhs => rw [this]; enter [1, 2, x]; rw [cc]
rw [_root_.integral_ofReal, ← cc, Complex.ofReal_re]
refine setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi fun x hx => ?_
push_cast
rw [Complex.ofReal_cpow (le_of_lt hx)]
push_cast; rfl
theorem Gamma_add_one {s : ℝ} (hs : s ≠ 0) : Gamma (s + 1) = s * Gamma s := by
simp_rw [Gamma]
rw [Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_add_one, Complex.re_ofReal_mul]
rwa [Complex.ofReal_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_one : Gamma 1 = 1 := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_one, Complex.Gamma_one, Complex.one_re]
theorem _root_.Complex.Gamma_ofReal (s : ℝ) : Complex.Gamma (s : ℂ) = Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma, eq_comm, ← Complex.conj_eq_iff_re, ← Complex.Gamma_conj, Complex.conj_ofReal]
theorem Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) : Gamma (n + 1) = n ! := by
rw [Gamma, Complex.ofReal_add, Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_one,
Complex.Gamma_nat_eq_factorial, ← Complex.ofReal_natCast, Complex.ofReal_re]
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_ofNat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ) [(n + 1).AtLeastTwo] :
Gamma (ofNat(n + 1) : ℝ) = n ! :=
mod_cast Gamma_nat_eq_factorial (n : ℕ)
/-- At `0` the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`. -/
@[simp]
theorem Gamma_zero : Gamma 0 = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_zero, Complex.Gamma_ofReal, Complex.ofReal_inj] using
Complex.Gamma_zero
/-- At `-n` for `n ∈ ℕ`, the Gamma function is undefined; by convention we assign it the value `0`.
-/
theorem Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero (n : ℕ) : Gamma (-n) = 0 := by
simpa only [← Complex.ofReal_natCast, ← Complex.ofReal_neg, Complex.Gamma_ofReal,
Complex.ofReal_eq_zero] using Complex.Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero n
theorem Gamma_pos_of_pos {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 < s) : 0 < Gamma s := by
rw [Gamma_eq_integral hs]
have : (Function.support fun x : ℝ => exp (-x) * x ^ (s - 1)) ∩ Ioi 0 = Ioi 0 := by
rw [inter_eq_right]
intro x hx
rw [Function.mem_support]
exact mul_ne_zero (exp_pos _).ne' (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _).ne'
rw [setIntegral_pos_iff_support_of_nonneg_ae]
· rw [this, volume_Ioi, ← ENNReal.ofReal_zero]
exact ENNReal.ofReal_lt_top
· refine eventually_of_mem (self_mem_ae_restrict measurableSet_Ioi) ?_
exact fun x hx => (mul_pos (exp_pos _) (rpow_pos_of_pos hx _)).le
· exact GammaIntegral_convergent hs
theorem Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg {s : ℝ} (hs : 0 ≤ s) : 0 ≤ Gamma s := by
obtain rfl | h := eq_or_lt_of_le hs
· rw [Gamma_zero]
· exact (Gamma_pos_of_pos h).le
open Complex in
/-- Expresses the integral over `Ioi 0` of `t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t))`, for positive real `r`,
in terms of the Gamma function. -/
lemma integral_rpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi {a r : ℝ} (ha : 0 < a) (hr : 0 < r) :
∫ t : ℝ in Ioi 0, t ^ (a - 1) * exp (-(r * t)) = (1 / r) ^ a * Gamma a := by
rw [← ofReal_inj, ofReal_mul, ← Gamma_ofReal, ofReal_cpow (by positivity), ofReal_div]
convert integral_cpow_mul_exp_neg_mul_Ioi (by rwa [ofReal_re] : 0 < (a : ℂ).re) hr
refine integral_ofReal.symm.trans <| setIntegral_congr_fun measurableSet_Ioi (fun t ht ↦ ?_)
norm_cast
simp_rw [← ofReal_cpow ht.le, RCLike.ofReal_mul, coe_algebraMap]
open Lean.Meta Qq Mathlib.Meta.Positivity in
/-- The `positivity` extension which identifies expressions of the form `Gamma a`. -/
@[positivity Gamma (_ : ℝ)]
def _root_.Mathlib.Meta.Positivity.evalGamma : PositivityExt where eval {u α} _zα _pα e := do
match u, α, e with
| 0, ~q(ℝ), ~q(Gamma $a) =>
match ← core q(inferInstance) q(inferInstance) a with
| .positive pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.positive q(Gamma_pos_of_pos $pa))
| .nonnegative pa =>
assertInstancesCommute
pure (.nonnegative q(Gamma_nonneg_of_nonneg $pa))
| _ => pure .none
| _, _, _ => throwError "failed to match on Gamma application"
/-- The Gamma function does not vanish on `ℝ` (except at non-positive integers, where the function
is mathematically undefined and we set it to `0` by convention). -/
theorem Gamma_ne_zero {s : ℝ} (hs : ∀ m : ℕ, s ≠ -m) : Gamma s ≠ 0 := by
suffices ∀ {n : ℕ}, -(n : ℝ) < s → Gamma s ≠ 0 by
apply this
swap
· exact ⌊-s⌋₊ + 1
rw [neg_lt, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one]
exact Nat.lt_floor_add_one _
intro n
induction n generalizing s with
| zero =>
intro hs
refine (Gamma_pos_of_pos ?_).ne'
rwa [Nat.cast_zero, neg_zero] at hs
| succ _ n_ih =>
intro hs'
have : Gamma (s + 1) ≠ 0 := by
apply n_ih
· intro m
specialize hs (1 + m)
contrapose! hs
rw [← eq_sub_iff_add_eq] at hs
rw [hs]
push_cast
ring
· rw [Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one, neg_add] at hs'
linarith
rw [Gamma_add_one, mul_ne_zero_iff] at this
· exact this.2
· simpa using hs 0
theorem Gamma_eq_zero_iff (s : ℝ) : Gamma s = 0 ↔ ∃ m : ℕ, s = -m :=
⟨by contrapose!; exact Gamma_ne_zero, by rintro ⟨m, rfl⟩; exact Gamma_neg_nat_eq_zero m⟩
end Real
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Gamma/Basic.lean | 646 | 649 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Fold
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Bind
import Mathlib.Order.SetNotation
/-!
# Unions of finite sets
This file defines the union of a family `t : α → Finset β` of finsets bounded by a finset
`s : Finset α`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.disjUnion`: Given a hypothesis `h` which states that finsets `s` and `t` are disjoint,
`s.disjUnion t h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjUnion s t h` iff `a ∈ s` or `a ∈ t`; this does
not require decidable equality on the type `α`.
* `Finset.biUnion`: Finite unions of finsets; given an indexing function `f : α → Finset β` and an
`s : Finset α`, `s.biUnion f` is the union of all finsets of the form `f a` for `a ∈ s`.
## TODO
Remove `Finset.biUnion` in favour of `Finset.sup`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero MulAction
variable {α β γ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Finset α} {t t₁ t₂ : α → Finset β}
namespace Finset
section DisjiUnion
/-- `disjiUnion s f h` is the set such that `a ∈ disjiUnion s f` iff `a ∈ f i` for some `i ∈ s`.
It is the same as `s.biUnion f`, but it does not require decidable equality on the type. The
hypothesis ensures that the sets are disjoint. -/
def disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (hf : (s : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint t) : Finset β :=
⟨s.val.bind (Finset.val ∘ t), Multiset.nodup_bind.2
⟨fun a _ ↦ (t a).nodup, s.nodup.pairwise fun _ ha _ hb hab ↦ disjoint_val.2 <| hf ha hb hab⟩⟩
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).1 = s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1 := rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_empty (t : α → Finset β) : disjiUnion ∅ t (by simp) = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_disjiUnion {b : β} {h} : b ∈ s.disjiUnion t h ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, disjiUnion_val, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_disjiUnion {h} : (s.disjiUnion t h : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_disjiUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_cons (a : α) (s : Finset α) (ha : a ∉ s) (f : α → Finset β) (H) :
disjiUnion (cons a s ha) f H =
(f a).disjUnion ((s.disjiUnion f) fun _ hb _ hc ↦ H (mem_cons_of_mem hb) (mem_cons_of_mem hc))
(disjoint_left.2 fun _ hb h ↦
let ⟨_, hc, h⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp h
disjoint_left.mp
(H (mem_cons_self a s) (mem_cons_of_mem hc) (ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hc ha).symm) hb h) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.cons_bind _ _ _
@[simp] lemma singleton_disjiUnion (a : α) {h} : Finset.disjiUnion {a} t h = t a :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.singleton_bind _ _
lemma disjiUnion_disjiUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) (h1 h2) :
(s.disjiUnion f h1).disjiUnion g h2 =
s.attach.disjiUnion
(fun a ↦ ((f a).disjiUnion g) fun _ hb _ hc ↦
h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hb⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hc⟩))
fun a _ b _ hab ↦
disjoint_left.mpr fun x hxa hxb ↦ by
obtain ⟨xa, hfa, hga⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxa
obtain ⟨xb, hfb, hgb⟩ := mem_disjiUnion.mp hxb
refine disjoint_left.mp
(h2 (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, a.prop, hfa⟩) (mem_disjiUnion.mpr ⟨_, b.prop, hfb⟩) ?_) hga
hgb
rintro rfl
exact disjoint_left.mp (h1 a.prop b.prop <| Subtype.coe_injective.ne hab) hfa hfb :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_assoc.trans (Multiset.attach_bind_coe _ _).symm
lemma sUnion_disjiUnion {f : α → Finset (Set β)} (I : Finset α)
(hf : (I : Set α).PairwiseDisjoint f) :
⋃₀ (I.disjiUnion f hf : Set (Set β)) = ⋃ a ∈ I, ⋃₀ ↑(f a) := by
ext
simp only [coe_disjiUnion, Set.mem_sUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, exists_prop]
tauto
section DecidableEq
variable [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β}
private lemma pairwiseDisjoint_fibers : Set.PairwiseDisjoint ↑t fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a) :=
fun x' hx y' hy hne ↦ by
simp_rw [disjoint_left, mem_filter]; rintro i ⟨_, rfl⟩ ⟨_, rfl⟩; exact hne rfl
@[simp] lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq (s : Finset α) (t : Finset β) (f : α → β) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers =
s.filter fun c ↦ f c ∈ t :=
ext fun b => by simpa using and_comm
lemma disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to (h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) :
t.disjiUnion (fun a ↦ s.filter (f · = a)) pairwiseDisjoint_fibers = s := by
simpa [filter_eq_self]
end DecidableEq
theorem map_disjiUnion {f : α ↪ β} {s : Finset α} {t : β → Finset γ} {h} :
(s.map f).disjiUnion t h =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => t (f a)) fun _ ha _ hb hab =>
h (mem_map_of_mem _ ha) (mem_map_of_mem _ hb) (f.injective.ne hab) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.bind_map _ _ _
theorem disjiUnion_map {s : Finset α} {t : α → Finset β} {f : β ↪ γ} {h} :
(s.disjiUnion t h).map f =
s.disjiUnion (fun a => (t a).map f) (h.mono' fun _ _ ↦ (disjoint_map _).2) :=
eq_of_veq <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _
variable {f : α → β} {op : β → β → β} [hc : Std.Commutative op] [ha : Std.Associative op]
theorem fold_disjiUnion {ι : Type*} {s : Finset ι} {t : ι → Finset α} {b : ι → β} {b₀ : β} (h) :
(s.disjiUnion t h).fold op (s.fold op b₀ b) f = s.fold op b₀ fun i => (t i).fold op (b i) f :=
(congr_arg _ <| Multiset.map_bind _ _ _).trans (Multiset.fold_bind _ _ _ _ _)
end DisjiUnion
section BUnion
variable [DecidableEq β]
/-- `Finset.biUnion s t` is the union of `t a` over `a ∈ s`.
(This was formerly `bind` due to the monad structure on types with `DecidableEq`.) -/
protected def biUnion (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) : Finset β :=
(s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).toFinset
@[simp] lemma biUnion_val (s : Finset α) (t : α → Finset β) :
(s.biUnion t).1 = (s.1.bind fun a ↦ (t a).1).dedup := rfl
@[simp] lemma biUnion_empty : Finset.biUnion ∅ t = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] lemma mem_biUnion {b : β} : b ∈ s.biUnion t ↔ ∃ a ∈ s, b ∈ t a := by
simp only [mem_def, biUnion_val, Multiset.mem_dedup, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma coe_biUnion : (s.biUnion t : Set β) = ⋃ x ∈ (s : Set α), t x := by
simp [Set.ext_iff, mem_biUnion, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_coe, imp_true_iff]
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} : (insert a s).biUnion t = t a ∪ s.biUnion t := by
aesop
lemma biUnion_congr (hs : s₁ = s₂) (ht : ∀ a ∈ s₁, t₁ a = t₂ a) :
s₁.biUnion t₁ = s₂.biUnion t₂ := by
aesop
@[simp]
lemma disjiUnion_eq_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (hf) :
s.disjiUnion f hf = s.biUnion f := eq_of_veq (s.disjiUnion f hf).nodup.dedup.symm
lemma biUnion_subset {s' : Finset β} : s.biUnion t ⊆ s' ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, t x ⊆ s' := by
simp only [subset_iff, mem_biUnion]
exact ⟨fun H a ha b hb ↦ H ⟨a, ha, hb⟩, fun H b ⟨a, ha, hb⟩ ↦ H a ha hb⟩
@[simp]
lemma singleton_biUnion {a : α} : Finset.biUnion {a} t = t a := by
classical rw [← insert_empty_eq, biUnion_insert, biUnion_empty, union_empty]
lemma biUnion_inter (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (t : Finset β) :
s.biUnion f ∩ t = s.biUnion fun x ↦ f x ∩ t := by
ext x
simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_inter]
tauto
lemma inter_biUnion (t : Finset β) (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) :
t ∩ s.biUnion f = s.biUnion fun x ↦ t ∩ f x := by
rw [inter_comm, biUnion_inter]
simp [inter_comm]
lemma biUnion_biUnion [DecidableEq γ] (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (g : β → Finset γ) :
(s.biUnion f).biUnion g = s.biUnion fun a ↦ (f a).biUnion g := by
ext
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, exists_prop]
simp_rw [← exists_and_right, ← exists_and_left, and_assoc]
rw [exists_comm]
lemma bind_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Multiset α) (t : α → Multiset β) :
(s.bind t).toFinset = s.toFinset.biUnion fun a ↦ (t a).toFinset :=
ext fun x ↦ by simp only [Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_biUnion, Multiset.mem_bind, exists_prop]
lemma biUnion_mono (h : ∀ a ∈ s, t₁ a ⊆ t₂ a) : s.biUnion t₁ ⊆ s.biUnion t₂ := by
have : ∀ b a, a ∈ s → b ∈ t₁ a → ∃ a : α, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ t₂ a := fun b a ha hb ↦
⟨a, ha, Finset.mem_of_subset (h a ha) hb⟩
simpa only [subset_iff, mem_biUnion, exists_imp, and_imp, exists_prop]
lemma biUnion_subset_biUnion_of_subset_left (t : α → Finset β) (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) :
s₁.biUnion t ⊆ s₂.biUnion t := fun x ↦ by
simp only [and_imp, mem_biUnion, exists_prop]; exact Exists.imp fun a ha ↦ ⟨h ha.1, ha.2⟩
lemma subset_biUnion_of_mem (u : α → Finset β) {x : α} (xs : x ∈ s) : u x ⊆ s.biUnion u :=
singleton_biUnion.superset.trans <|
biUnion_subset_biUnion_of_subset_left u <| singleton_subset_iff.2 xs
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_subset_iff_forall_subset {α β : Type*} [DecidableEq β] {s : Finset α}
{t : Finset β} {f : α → Finset β} : s.biUnion f ⊆ t ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, f x ⊆ t :=
⟨fun h _ hx ↦ (subset_biUnion_of_mem f hx).trans h, fun h _ hx ↦
let ⟨_, ha₁, ha₂⟩ := mem_biUnion.mp hx
h _ ha₁ ha₂⟩
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_singleton_eq_self [DecidableEq α] : s.biUnion (singleton : α → Finset α) = s :=
ext fun x ↦ by simp only [mem_biUnion, mem_singleton, exists_prop, exists_eq_right']
lemma filter_biUnion (s : Finset α) (f : α → Finset β) (p : β → Prop) [DecidablePred p] :
(s.biUnion f).filter p = s.biUnion fun a ↦ (f a).filter p := by
ext b
simp only [mem_biUnion, exists_prop, mem_filter]
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨a, ha, hba⟩, hb⟩
exact ⟨a, ha, hba, hb⟩
· rintro ⟨a, ha, hba, hb⟩
exact ⟨⟨a, ha, hba⟩, hb⟩
lemma biUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to [DecidableEq α] {s : Finset α} {t : Finset β} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ x ∈ s, f x ∈ t) : (t.biUnion fun a ↦ s.filter fun c ↦ f c = a) = s := by
simpa only [disjiUnion_eq_biUnion] using disjiUnion_filter_eq_of_maps_to h
lemma erase_biUnion (f : α → Finset β) (s : Finset α) (b : β) :
(s.biUnion f).erase b = s.biUnion fun x ↦ (f x).erase b := by
ext a
simp only [mem_biUnion, not_exists, not_and, mem_erase, ne_eq]
tauto
@[simp]
lemma biUnion_nonempty : (s.biUnion t).Nonempty ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, (t x).Nonempty := by
simp only [Finset.Nonempty, mem_biUnion]
| rw [exists_swap]
simp [exists_and_left]
lemma Nonempty.biUnion (hs : s.Nonempty) (ht : ∀ x ∈ s, (t x).Nonempty) :
(s.biUnion t).Nonempty := biUnion_nonempty.2 <| hs.imp fun x hx ↦ ⟨hx, ht x hx⟩
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Union.lean | 239 | 243 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Range
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Topology.Defs.Filter
/-!
# Openness and closedness of a set
This file provides lemmas relating to the predicates `IsOpen` and `IsClosed` of a set endowed with
a topology.
## Implementation notes
Topology in mathlib heavily uses filters (even more than in Bourbaki). See explanations in
<https://leanprover-community.github.io/theories/topology.html>.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
## Tags
topological space
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v
/-- A constructor for topologies by specifying the closed sets,
and showing that they satisfy the appropriate conditions. -/
def TopologicalSpace.ofClosed {X : Type u} (T : Set (Set X)) (empty_mem : ∅ ∈ T)
(sInter_mem : ∀ A, A ⊆ T → ⋂₀ A ∈ T)
(union_mem : ∀ A, A ∈ T → ∀ B, B ∈ T → A ∪ B ∈ T) : TopologicalSpace X where
IsOpen X := Xᶜ ∈ T
isOpen_univ := by simp [empty_mem]
isOpen_inter s t hs ht := by simpa only [compl_inter] using union_mem sᶜ hs tᶜ ht
isOpen_sUnion s hs := by
simp only [Set.compl_sUnion]
exact sInter_mem (compl '' s) fun z ⟨y, hy, hz⟩ => hz ▸ hs y hy
section TopologicalSpace
variable {X : Type u} {ι : Sort v} {α : Type*} {x : X} {s s₁ s₂ t : Set X} {p p₁ p₂ : X → Prop}
lemma isOpen_mk {p h₁ h₂ h₃} : IsOpen[⟨p, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩] s ↔ p s := Iff.rfl
@[ext (iff := false)]
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext :
∀ {f g : TopologicalSpace X}, IsOpen[f] = IsOpen[g] → f = g
| ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, ⟨_, _, _, _⟩, rfl => rfl
protected theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff {t t' : TopologicalSpace X} :
t = t' ↔ ∀ s, IsOpen[t] s ↔ IsOpen[t'] s :=
⟨fun h _ => h ▸ Iff.rfl, fun h => by ext; exact h _⟩
theorem isOpen_fold {t : TopologicalSpace X} : t.IsOpen s = IsOpen[t] s :=
rfl
variable [TopologicalSpace X]
theorem isOpen_iUnion {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) : IsOpen (⋃ i, f i) :=
isOpen_sUnion (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isOpen_iUnion fun i => isOpen_iUnion fun hi => h i hi
theorem IsOpen.union (h₁ : IsOpen s₁) (h₂ : IsOpen s₂) : IsOpen (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
rw [union_eq_iUnion]; exact isOpen_iUnion (Bool.forall_bool.2 ⟨h₂, h₁⟩)
lemma isOpen_iff_of_cover {f : α → Set X} (ho : ∀ i, IsOpen (f i)) (hU : (⋃ i, f i) = univ) :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ i, IsOpen (f i ∩ s) := by
refine ⟨fun h i ↦ (ho i).inter h, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
rw [← s.inter_univ, inter_comm, ← hU, iUnion_inter]
exact isOpen_iUnion fun i ↦ h i
@[simp] theorem isOpen_empty : IsOpen (∅ : Set X) := by
rw [← sUnion_empty]; exact isOpen_sUnion fun a => False.elim
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} (hs : s.Finite) (h : ∀ t ∈ s, IsOpen t) :
IsOpen (⋂₀ s) := by
induction s, hs using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => rw [sInter_empty]; exact isOpen_univ
| insert _ _ ih =>
simp only [sInter_insert, forall_mem_insert] at h ⊢
exact h.1.inter (ih h.2)
theorem Set.Finite.isOpen_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
sInter_image f s ▸ (hs.image _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_image.2 h)
theorem isOpen_iInter_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsOpen (s i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i, s i) :=
(finite_range _).isOpen_sInter (forall_mem_range.2 h)
theorem isOpen_biInter_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsOpen (f i)) :
IsOpen (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isOpen_biInter h
@[simp]
theorem isOpen_const {p : Prop} : IsOpen { _x : X | p } := by by_cases p <;> simp [*]
theorem IsOpen.and : IsOpen { x | p₁ x } → IsOpen { x | p₂ x } → IsOpen { x | p₁ x ∧ p₂ x } :=
IsOpen.inter
@[simp] theorem isOpen_compl_iff : IsOpen sᶜ ↔ IsClosed s :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h⟩, fun h => h.isOpen_compl⟩
theorem TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed {X} {t₁ t₂ : TopologicalSpace X} :
t₁ = t₂ ↔ ∀ s, IsClosed[t₁] s ↔ IsClosed[t₂] s := by
rw [TopologicalSpace.ext_iff, compl_surjective.forall]
simp only [@isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₁, @isOpen_compl_iff _ _ t₂]
alias ⟨_, TopologicalSpace.ext_isClosed⟩ := TopologicalSpace.ext_iff_isClosed
theorem isClosed_const {p : Prop} : IsClosed { _x : X | p } := ⟨isOpen_const (p := ¬p)⟩
@[simp] theorem isClosed_empty : IsClosed (∅ : Set X) := isClosed_const
@[simp] theorem isClosed_univ : IsClosed (univ : Set X) := isClosed_const
lemma IsOpen.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsOpen s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, hs, isClosed_univ, (inter_univ _).symm⟩
lemma IsClosed.isLocallyClosed (hs : IsClosed s) : IsLocallyClosed s :=
⟨_, _, isOpen_univ, hs, (univ_inter _).symm⟩
theorem IsClosed.union : IsClosed s₁ → IsClosed s₂ → IsClosed (s₁ ∪ s₂) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_union] using IsOpen.inter
theorem isClosed_sInter {s : Set (Set X)} : (∀ t ∈ s, IsClosed t) → IsClosed (⋂₀ s) := by
simpa only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_sInter, sUnion_image] using isOpen_biUnion
theorem isClosed_iInter {f : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (f i)) : IsClosed (⋂ i, f i) :=
isClosed_sInter <| forall_mem_range.2 h
theorem isClosed_biInter {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋂ i ∈ s, f i) :=
isClosed_iInter fun i => isClosed_iInter <| h i
@[simp]
theorem isClosed_compl_iff {s : Set X} : IsClosed sᶜ ↔ IsOpen s := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_compl]
alias ⟨_, IsOpen.isClosed_compl⟩ := isClosed_compl_iff
theorem IsOpen.sdiff (h₁ : IsOpen s) (h₂ : IsClosed t) : IsOpen (s \ t) :=
IsOpen.inter h₁ h₂.isOpen_compl
theorem IsClosed.inter (h₁ : IsClosed s₁) (h₂ : IsClosed s₂) : IsClosed (s₁ ∩ s₂) := by
rw [← isOpen_compl_iff] at *
rw [compl_inter]
exact IsOpen.union h₁ h₂
theorem IsClosed.sdiff (h₁ : IsClosed s) (h₂ : IsOpen t) : IsClosed (s \ t) :=
IsClosed.inter h₁ (isClosed_compl_iff.mpr h₂)
theorem Set.Finite.isClosed_biUnion {s : Set α} {f : α → Set X} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact hs.isOpen_biInter h
lemma isClosed_biUnion_finset {s : Finset α} {f : α → Set X} (h : ∀ i ∈ s, IsClosed (f i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i ∈ s, f i) :=
s.finite_toSet.isClosed_biUnion h
theorem isClosed_iUnion_of_finite [Finite ι] {s : ι → Set X} (h : ∀ i, IsClosed (s i)) :
IsClosed (⋃ i, s i) := by
simp only [← isOpen_compl_iff, compl_iUnion] at *
exact isOpen_iInter_of_finite h
theorem isClosed_imp {p q : X → Prop} (hp : IsOpen { x | p x }) (hq : IsClosed { x | q x }) :
IsClosed { x | p x → q x } := by
simpa only [imp_iff_not_or] using hp.isClosed_compl.union hq
theorem IsClosed.not : IsClosed { a | p a } → IsOpen { a | ¬p a } :=
isOpen_compl_iff.mpr
/-!
### Limits of filters in topological spaces
In this section we define functions that return a limit of a filter (or of a function along a
filter), if it exists, and a random point otherwise. These functions are rarely used in Mathlib,
most of the theorems are written using `Filter.Tendsto`. One of the reasons is that
`Filter.limUnder f g = x` is not equivalent to `Filter.Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)` unless the codomain is a
Hausdorff space and `g` has a limit along `f`.
-/
section lim
/-- If a filter `f` is majorated by some `𝓝 x`, then it is majorated by `𝓝 (Filter.lim f)`. We
formulate this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for
types without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify
this instance with any other instance. -/
theorem le_nhds_lim {f : Filter X} (h : ∃ x, f ≤ 𝓝 x) : f ≤ 𝓝 (@lim _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f) :=
Classical.epsilon_spec h
/-- If `g` tends to some `𝓝 x` along `f`, then it tends to `𝓝 (Filter.limUnder f g)`. We formulate
this lemma with a `[Nonempty X]` argument of `lim` derived from `h` to make it useful for types
without a `[Nonempty X]` instance. Because of the built-in proof irrelevance, Lean will unify this
instance with any other instance. -/
theorem tendsto_nhds_limUnder {f : Filter α} {g : α → X} (h : ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
Tendsto g f (𝓝 (@limUnder _ _ _ (nonempty_of_exists h) f g)) :=
le_nhds_lim h
theorem limUnder_of_not_tendsto [hX : Nonempty X] {f : Filter α} {g : α → X}
(h : ¬ ∃ x, Tendsto g f (𝓝 x)) :
limUnder f g = Classical.choice hX := by
simp_rw [Tendsto] at h
simp_rw [limUnder, lim, Classical.epsilon, Classical.strongIndefiniteDescription, dif_neg h]
end lim
end TopologicalSpace
| Mathlib/Topology/Basic.lean | 1,143 | 1,145 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 1,486 | 1,488 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Johannes Hölzl, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Image
import Mathlib.Data.SProd
/-!
# Sets in product and pi types
This file proves basic properties of product of sets in `α × β` and in `Π i, α i`, and of the
diagonal of a type.
## Main declarations
This file contains basic results on the following notions, which are defined in `Set.Operations`.
* `Set.prod`: Binary product of sets. For `s : Set α`, `t : Set β`, we have
`s.prod t : Set (α × β)`. Denoted by `s ×ˢ t`.
* `Set.diagonal`: Diagonal of a type. `Set.diagonal α = {(x, x) | x : α}`.
* `Set.offDiag`: Off-diagonal. `s ×ˢ s` without the diagonal.
* `Set.pi`: Arbitrary product of sets.
-/
open Function
namespace Set
/-! ### Cartesian binary product of sets -/
section Prod
variable {α β γ δ : Type*} {s s₁ s₂ : Set α} {t t₁ t₂ : Set β} {a : α} {b : β}
theorem Subsingleton.prod (hs : s.Subsingleton) (ht : t.Subsingleton) :
(s ×ˢ t).Subsingleton := fun _x hx _y hy ↦
Prod.ext (hs hx.1 hy.1) (ht hx.2 hy.2)
noncomputable instance decidableMemProd [DecidablePred (· ∈ s)] [DecidablePred (· ∈ t)] :
DecidablePred (· ∈ s ×ˢ t) := fun x => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (x.1 ∈ s ∧ x.2 ∈ t))
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ :=
fun _ ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨hs h₁, ht h₂⟩
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_left (hs : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : s₁ ×ˢ t ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ t :=
prod_mono hs Subset.rfl
@[gcongr]
theorem prod_mono_right (ht : t₁ ⊆ t₂) : s ×ˢ t₁ ⊆ s ×ˢ t₂ :=
prod_mono Subset.rfl ht
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_subset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊆ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊆ s₂ :=
⟨fun h _ hx => (h (mk_mem_prod hx hx)).1, fun h _ hx => ⟨h hx.1, h hx.2⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem prod_self_ssubset_prod_self : s₁ ×ˢ s₁ ⊂ s₂ ×ˢ s₂ ↔ s₁ ⊂ s₂ :=
and_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self <| not_congr prod_self_subset_prod_self
theorem prod_subset_iff {P : Set (α × β)} : s ×ˢ t ⊆ P ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, (x, y) ∈ P :=
⟨fun h _ hx _ hy => h (mk_mem_prod hx hy), fun h ⟨_, _⟩ hp => h _ hp.1 _ hp.2⟩
theorem forall_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∀ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, p (x, y) :=
prod_subset_iff
theorem exists_prod_set {p : α × β → Prop} : (∃ x ∈ s ×ˢ t, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, p (x, y) := by
simp [and_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem prod_empty : s ×ˢ (∅ : Set β) = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (and_false _)
@[simp]
theorem empty_prod : (∅ : Set α) ×ˢ t = ∅ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (false_and _)
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem univ_prod_univ : @univ α ×ˢ @univ β = univ := by
ext
exact iff_of_eq (true_and _)
theorem univ_prod {t : Set β} : (univ : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.snd ⁻¹' t := by simp [prod_eq]
theorem prod_univ {s : Set α} : s ×ˢ (univ : Set β) = Prod.fst ⁻¹' s := by simp [prod_eq]
@[simp] lemma prod_eq_univ [Nonempty α] [Nonempty β] : s ×ˢ t = univ ↔ s = univ ∧ t = univ := by
simp [eq_univ_iff_forall, forall_and]
theorem singleton_prod : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ t = Prod.mk a '' t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
theorem prod_singleton : s ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = (fun a => (a, b)) '' s := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_left_comm, eq_comm]
@[simp]
theorem singleton_prod_singleton : ({a} : Set α) ×ˢ ({b} : Set β) = {(a, b)} := by ext ⟨c, d⟩; simp
@[simp]
theorem union_prod : (s₁ ∪ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∪ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [or_and_right]
@[simp]
theorem prod_union : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∪ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∪ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_or_left]
theorem inter_prod : (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ t = s₁ ×ˢ t ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_right, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
theorem prod_inter : s ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) = s ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s ×ˢ t₂ := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp only [← and_and_left, mem_inter_iff, mem_prod]
@[mfld_simps]
theorem prod_inter_prod : s₁ ×ˢ t₁ ∩ s₂ ×ˢ t₂ = (s₁ ∩ s₂) ×ˢ (t₁ ∩ t₂) := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp [and_assoc, and_left_comm]
lemma compl_prod_eq_union {α β : Type*} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) :
(s ×ˢ t)ᶜ = (sᶜ ×ˢ univ) ∪ (univ ×ˢ tᶜ) := by
ext p
simp only [mem_compl_iff, mem_prod, not_and, mem_union, mem_univ, and_true, true_and]
constructor <;> intro h
· by_cases fst_in_s : p.fst ∈ s
· exact Or.inr (h fst_in_s)
| · exact Or.inl fst_in_s
· intro fst_in_s
simpa only [fst_in_s, not_true, false_or] using h
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Prod.lean | 137 | 139 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Max
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.EquivFin
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.Sort
import Mathlib.Order.RelIso.Set
/-!
# Construct a sorted list from a finset.
-/
namespace Finset
open Multiset Nat
variable {α β : Type*}
/-! ### sort -/
section sort
variable (r : α → α → Prop) [DecidableRel r] [IsTrans α r] [IsAntisymm α r] [IsTotal α r]
/-- `sort s` constructs a sorted list from the unordered set `s`.
(Uses merge sort algorithm.) -/
def sort (s : Finset α) : List α :=
Multiset.sort r s.1
@[simp]
theorem sort_val (s : Finset α) : Multiset.sort r s.val = sort r s :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem sort_mk {s : Multiset α} (h : s.Nodup) : sort r ⟨s, h⟩ = s.sort r := rfl
@[simp]
theorem sort_sorted (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted r (sort r s) :=
Multiset.sort_sorted _ _
@[simp]
theorem sort_eq (s : Finset α) : ↑(sort r s) = s.1 :=
Multiset.sort_eq _ _
@[simp]
theorem sort_nodup (s : Finset α) : (sort r s).Nodup :=
(by rw [sort_eq]; exact s.2 : @Multiset.Nodup α (sort r s))
@[simp]
theorem sort_toFinset [DecidableEq α] (s : Finset α) : (sort r s).toFinset = s :=
List.toFinset_eq (sort_nodup r s) ▸ eq_of_veq (sort_eq r s)
@[simp]
theorem mem_sort {s : Finset α} {a : α} : a ∈ sort r s ↔ a ∈ s :=
Multiset.mem_sort _
@[simp]
theorem length_sort {s : Finset α} : (sort r s).length = s.card :=
Multiset.length_sort _
@[simp]
theorem sort_empty : sort r ∅ = [] :=
Multiset.sort_zero r
@[simp]
theorem sort_singleton (a : α) : sort r {a} = [a] :=
Multiset.sort_singleton r a
theorem sort_cons {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h₁ : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) (h₂ : a ∉ s) :
sort r (cons a s h₂) = a :: sort r s := by
rw [sort, cons_val, Multiset.sort_cons r a _ h₁, sort_val]
theorem sort_insert [DecidableEq α] {a : α} {s : Finset α} (h₁ : ∀ b ∈ s, r a b) (h₂ : a ∉ s) :
sort r (insert a s) = a :: sort r s := by
rw [← cons_eq_insert _ _ h₂, sort_cons r h₁]
@[simp]
theorem sort_range (n : ℕ) : sort (· ≤ ·) (range n) = List.range n :=
Multiset.sort_range n
open scoped List in
theorem sort_perm_toList (s : Finset α) : sort r s ~ s.toList := by
rw [← Multiset.coe_eq_coe]
simp only [coe_toList, sort_eq]
theorem _root_.List.toFinset_sort [DecidableEq α] {l : List α} (hl : l.Nodup) :
sort r l.toFinset = l ↔ l.Sorted r := by
refine ⟨?_, List.eq_of_perm_of_sorted ((sort_perm_toList r _).trans (List.toFinset_toList hl))
(sort_sorted r _)⟩
intro h
rw [← h]
exact sort_sorted r _
end sort
section SortLinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α]
theorem sort_sorted_lt (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted (· < ·) (sort (· ≤ ·) s) :=
(sort_sorted _ _).lt_of_le (sort_nodup _ _)
theorem sort_sorted_gt (s : Finset α) : List.Sorted (· > ·) (sort (· ≥ ·) s) :=
(sort_sorted _ _).gt_of_ge (sort_nodup _ _)
theorem sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux (s : Finset α) (h : 0 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length) (H : s.Nonempty) :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).get ⟨0, h⟩ = s.min' H := by
let l := s.sort (· ≤ ·)
apply le_antisymm
· have : s.min' H ∈ l := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).mpr (s.min'_mem H)
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, l.get i = s.min' H := List.mem_iff_get.1 this
rw [← hi]
exact (s.sort_sorted (· ≤ ·)).rel_get_of_le (Nat.zero_le i)
· have : l.get ⟨0, h⟩ ∈ s := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).1 (List.get_mem l _)
exact s.min'_le _ this
theorem sorted_zero_eq_min' {s : Finset α} {h : 0 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length} :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[0] = s.min' (card_pos.1 <| by rwa [length_sort] at h) :=
sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux _ _ _
theorem min'_eq_sorted_zero {s : Finset α} {h : s.Nonempty} :
s.min' h = (s.sort (· ≤ ·))[0]'(by rw [length_sort]; exact card_pos.2 h) :=
(sorted_zero_eq_min'_aux _ _ _).symm
theorem sorted_last_eq_max'_aux (s : Finset α)
(h : (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length) (H : s.Nonempty) :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1] = s.max' H := by
let l := s.sort (· ≤ ·)
apply le_antisymm
· have : l.get ⟨(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1, h⟩ ∈ s :=
(Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).1 (List.get_mem l _)
exact s.le_max' _ this
· have : s.max' H ∈ l := (Finset.mem_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).mpr (s.max'_mem H)
obtain ⟨i, hi⟩ : ∃ i, l.get i = s.max' H := List.mem_iff_get.1 this
rw [← hi]
exact (s.sort_sorted (· ≤ ·)).rel_get_of_le (Nat.le_sub_one_of_lt i.prop)
theorem sorted_last_eq_max' {s : Finset α}
{h : (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1 < (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length} :
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1] =
s.max' (by rw [length_sort] at h; exact card_pos.1 (lt_of_le_of_lt bot_le h)) :=
sorted_last_eq_max'_aux _ h _
theorem max'_eq_sorted_last {s : Finset α} {h : s.Nonempty} :
s.max' h =
(s.sort (· ≤ ·))[(s.sort (· ≤ ·)).length - 1]'
(by simpa using Nat.sub_lt (card_pos.mpr h) Nat.zero_lt_one) :=
(sorted_last_eq_max'_aux _ (by simpa using Nat.sub_lt (card_pos.mpr h) Nat.zero_lt_one) _).symm
/-- Given a finset `s` of cardinality `k` in a linear order `α`, the map `orderIsoOfFin s h`
is the increasing bijection between `Fin k` and `s` as an `OrderIso`. Here, `h` is a proof that
the cardinality of `s` is `k`. We use this instead of an iso `Fin s.card ≃o s` to avoid
casting issues in further uses of this function. -/
def orderIsoOfFin (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) : Fin k ≃o s :=
OrderIso.trans (Fin.castOrderIso ((length_sort (α := α) (· ≤ ·)).trans h).symm) <|
(s.sort_sorted_lt.getIso _).trans <| OrderIso.setCongr _ _ <| Set.ext fun _ => mem_sort _
/-- Given a finset `s` of cardinality `k` in a linear order `α`, the map `orderEmbOfFin s h` is
the increasing bijection between `Fin k` and `s` as an order embedding into `α`. Here, `h` is a
proof that the cardinality of `s` is `k`. We use this instead of an embedding `Fin s.card ↪o α` to
avoid casting issues in further uses of this function. -/
def orderEmbOfFin (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) : Fin k ↪o α :=
(orderIsoOfFin s h).toOrderEmbedding.trans (OrderEmbedding.subtype _)
@[simp]
theorem coe_orderIsoOfFin_apply (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) (i : Fin k) :
↑(orderIsoOfFin s h i) = orderEmbOfFin s h i :=
rfl
theorem orderIsoOfFin_symm_apply (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) (x : s) :
↑((s.orderIsoOfFin h).symm x) = (s.sort (· ≤ ·)).idxOf ↑x :=
rfl
theorem orderEmbOfFin_apply (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) (i : Fin k) :
s.orderEmbOfFin h i = (s.sort (· ≤ ·))[i]'(by rw [length_sort, h]; exact i.2) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem orderEmbOfFin_mem (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) (i : Fin k) :
s.orderEmbOfFin h i ∈ s :=
(s.orderIsoOfFin h i).2
@[simp]
theorem range_orderEmbOfFin (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) :
Set.range (s.orderEmbOfFin h) = s := by
simp only [orderEmbOfFin, Set.range_comp ((↑) : _ → α) (s.orderIsoOfFin h),
RelEmbedding.coe_trans, Set.image_univ, Finset.orderEmbOfFin, RelIso.range_eq,
OrderEmbedding.coe_subtype, OrderIso.coe_toOrderEmbedding, eq_self_iff_true,
Subtype.range_coe_subtype, Finset.setOf_mem, Finset.coe_inj]
@[simp]
theorem image_orderEmbOfFin_univ (s : Finset α) {k : ℕ} (h : s.card = k) :
Finset.image (s.orderEmbOfFin h) Finset.univ = s := by
| apply Finset.coe_injective
simp
| Mathlib/Data/Finset/Sort.lean | 197 | 199 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Bochner.ContinuousLinearMap
/-!
# Integral average of a function
In this file we define `MeasureTheory.average μ f` (notation: `⨍ x, f x ∂μ`) to be the average
value of `f` with respect to measure `μ`. It is defined as `∫ x, f x ∂((μ univ)⁻¹ • μ)`, so it
is equal to zero if `f` is not integrable or if `μ` is an infinite measure. If `μ` is a probability
measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, we use `⨍ x in s, f x ∂μ` (notation for `⨍ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`). For
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`.
Both have a version for the Lebesgue integral rather than Bochner.
We prove several version of the first moment method: An integrable function is below/above its
average on a set of positive measure:
* `measure_le_setLAverage_pos` for the Lebesgue integral
* `measure_le_setAverage_pos` for the Bochner integral
## Implementation notes
The average is defined as an integral over `(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ` so that all theorems about Bochner
integrals work for the average without modifications. For theorems that require integrability of a
function, we provide a convenience lemma `MeasureTheory.Integrable.to_average`.
## Tags
integral, center mass, average value
-/
open ENNReal MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Metric Set Filter TopologicalSpace Function
open scoped Topology ENNReal Convex
variable {α E F : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace ℝ F] [CompleteSpace F] {μ ν : Measure α}
{s t : Set α}
/-!
### Average value of a function w.r.t. a measure
The (Bochner, Lebesgue) average value of a function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` (notation:
`⨍ x, f x ∂μ`, `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`) is defined as the (Bochner, Lebesgue) integral divided by the total
measure, so it is equal to zero if `μ` is an infinite measure, and (typically) equal to infinity if
`f` is not integrable. If `μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to
its integral.
-/
namespace MeasureTheory
section ENNReal
variable (μ) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`, denoted `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
noncomputable def laverage (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) := ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ`.
It is equal to `(μ univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `μ` is an infinite measure. If
`μ` is a probability measure, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(μ.restrict s)`. For the
average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage μ r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure.
It is equal to `(volume univ)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if the space has infinite
measure. In a probability space, the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average on a set, use `⨍⁻ x in s, f x`, defined as `⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(volume.restrict s)`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage volume f) => r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. a measure `μ` on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(μ s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If `s`
has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral.
For the average w.r.t. the volume, one can omit `∂volume`. -/
notation3 "⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => f)" ∂"μ:70 => laverage (Measure.restrict μ s) r
/-- Average value of an `ℝ≥0∞`-valued function `f` w.r.t. to the standard measure on a set `s`.
It is equal to `(volume s)⁻¹ * ∫⁻ x, f x`, so it takes value zero if `s` has infinite measure. If
`s` has measure `1`, then the average of any function is equal to its integral. -/
notation3 (prettyPrint := false)
"⨍⁻ "(...)" in "s", "r:60:(scoped f => laverage Measure.restrict volume s f) => r
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero : ⨍⁻ _x, (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ∂μ = 0 := by rw [laverage, lintegral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem laverage_zero_measure (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂(0 : Measure α) = 0 := by simp [laverage]
theorem laverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ univ)⁻¹ • μ := rfl
theorem laverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ) / μ univ := by
rw [laverage_eq', lintegral_smul_measure, ENNReal.div_eq_inv_mul, smul_eq_mul]
theorem laverage_eq_lintegral [IsProbabilityMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by rw [laverage, measure_univ, inv_one, one_smul]
@[simp]
theorem measure_mul_laverage [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) :
μ univ * ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂μ := by
rcases eq_or_ne μ 0 with hμ | hμ
· rw [hμ, lintegral_zero_measure, laverage_zero_measure, mul_zero]
· rw [laverage_eq, ENNReal.mul_div_cancel (measure_univ_ne_zero.2 hμ) (measure_ne_top _ _)]
theorem setLAverage_eq (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = (∫⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ) / μ s := by rw [laverage_eq, restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq := setLAverage_eq
theorem setLAverage_eq' (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (s : Set α) :
⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ∫⁻ x, f x ∂(μ s)⁻¹ • μ.restrict s := by
simp only [laverage_eq', restrict_apply_univ]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-22")] alias setLaverage_eq' := setLAverage_eq'
variable {μ}
theorem laverage_congr {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (h : f =ᵐ[μ] g) : ⨍⁻ x, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x, g x ∂μ := by
simp only [laverage_eq, lintegral_congr_ae h]
| theorem setLAverage_congr (h : s =ᵐ[μ] t) : ⨍⁻ x in s, f x ∂μ = ⨍⁻ x in t, f x ∂μ := by
simp only [setLAverage_eq, setLIntegral_congr h, measure_congr h]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/Average.lean | 138 | 140 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Oliver Nash. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Antoine Chambert-Loir, Oliver Nash
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Identities
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Nilpotent.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Nilpotent
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.Tower
/-!
# Newton-Raphson method
Given a single-variable polynomial `P` with derivative `P'`, Newton's method concerns iteration of
the rational map: `x ↦ x - P(x) / P'(x)`.
Over a field it can serve as a root-finding algorithm. It is also useful tool in certain proofs
such as Hensel's lemma and Jordan-Chevalley decomposition.
## Main definitions / results:
* `Polynomial.newtonMap`: the map `x ↦ x - P(x) / P'(x)`, where `P'` is the derivative of the
polynomial `P`.
* `Polynomial.isFixedPt_newtonMap_of_isUnit_iff`: `x` is a fixed point for Newton iteration iff
it is a root of `P` (provided `P'(x)` is a unit).
* `Polynomial.existsUnique_nilpotent_sub_and_aeval_eq_zero`: if `x` is almost a root of `P` in the
sense that `P(x)` is nilpotent (and `P'(x)` is a unit) then we may write `x` as a sum
`x = n + r` where `n` is nilpotent and `r` is a root of `P`. This can be used to prove the
Jordan-Chevalley decomposition of linear endomorphims.
-/
open Set Function
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
variable {R S : Type*} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] [Algebra R S] (P : R[X]) {x : S}
/-- Given a single-variable polynomial `P` with derivative `P'`, this is the map:
`x ↦ x - P(x) / P'(x)`. When `P'(x)` is not a unit we use a junk-value pattern and send `x ↦ x`. -/
def newtonMap (x : S) : S :=
x - (Ring.inverse <| aeval x (derivative P)) * aeval x P
theorem newtonMap_apply :
P.newtonMap x = x - (Ring.inverse <| aeval x (derivative P)) * (aeval x P) :=
rfl
variable {P}
theorem newtonMap_apply_of_isUnit (h : IsUnit <| aeval x (derivative P)) :
P.newtonMap x = x - h.unit⁻¹ * aeval x P := by
simp [newtonMap_apply, Ring.inverse, h]
theorem newtonMap_apply_of_not_isUnit (h : ¬ (IsUnit <| aeval x (derivative P))) :
P.newtonMap x = x := by
simp [newtonMap_apply, Ring.inverse, h]
theorem isNilpotent_iterate_newtonMap_sub_of_isNilpotent (h : IsNilpotent <| aeval x P) (n : ℕ) :
IsNilpotent <| P.newtonMap^[n] x - x := by
induction n with
| zero => simp
| succ n ih =>
rw [iterate_succ', comp_apply, newtonMap_apply, sub_right_comm]
refine (Commute.all _ _).isNilpotent_sub ih <| (Commute.all _ _).isNilpotent_mul_right ?_
simpa using Commute.isNilpotent_add (Commute.all _ _)
(isNilpotent_aeval_sub_of_isNilpotent_sub P ih) h
theorem isFixedPt_newtonMap_of_aeval_eq_zero (h : aeval x P = 0) :
IsFixedPt P.newtonMap x := by
rw [IsFixedPt, newtonMap_apply, h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
| theorem isFixedPt_newtonMap_of_isUnit_iff (h : IsUnit <| aeval x (derivative P)) :
IsFixedPt P.newtonMap x ↔ aeval x P = 0 := by
rw [IsFixedPt, newtonMap_apply, sub_eq_self, Ring.inverse_mul_eq_iff_eq_mul _ _ _ h, mul_zero]
| Mathlib/Dynamics/Newton.lean | 75 | 77 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Josha Dekker. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Josha Dekker
-/
import Mathlib.Probability.ProbabilityMassFunction.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.StronglyMeasurable.Basic
/-! # Geometric distributions over ℕ
Define the geometric measure over the natural numbers
## Main definitions
* `geometricPMFReal`: the function `p n ↦ (1-p) ^ n * p`
for `n ∈ ℕ`, which is the probability density function of a geometric distribution with
success probability `p ∈ (0,1]`.
* `geometricPMF`: `ℝ≥0∞`-valued pmf,
`geometricPMF p = ENNReal.ofReal (geometricPMFReal p)`.
* `geometricMeasure`: a geometric measure on `ℕ`, parametrized by its success probability `p`.
-/
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
open MeasureTheory Real Set Filter Topology
namespace ProbabilityTheory
variable {p : ℝ}
section GeometricPMF
/-- The pmf of the geometric distribution depending on its success probability. -/
noncomputable
def geometricPMFReal (p : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : ℝ := (1-p) ^ n * p
lemma geometricPMFRealSum (hp_pos : 0 < p) (hp_le_one : p ≤ 1) :
HasSum (fun n ↦ geometricPMFReal p n) 1 := by
unfold geometricPMFReal
have := hasSum_geometric_of_lt_one (sub_nonneg.mpr hp_le_one) (sub_lt_self 1 hp_pos)
apply (hasSum_mul_right_iff (hp_pos.ne')).mpr at this
simp only [sub_sub_cancel] at this
rw [inv_mul_eq_div, div_self hp_pos.ne'] at this
exact this
/-- The geometric pmf is positive for all natural numbers -/
lemma geometricPMFReal_pos {n : ℕ} (hp_pos : 0 < p) (hp_lt_one : p < 1) :
0 < geometricPMFReal p n := by
rw [geometricPMFReal]
have : 0 < 1 - p := sub_pos.mpr hp_lt_one
positivity
lemma geometricPMFReal_nonneg {n : ℕ} (hp_pos : 0 < p) (hp_le_one : p ≤ 1) :
0 ≤ geometricPMFReal p n := by
rw [geometricPMFReal]
have : 0 ≤ 1 - p := sub_nonneg.mpr hp_le_one
positivity
/-- Geometric distribution with success probability `p`. -/
noncomputable
def geometricPMF (hp_pos : 0 < p) (hp_le_one : p ≤ 1) : PMF ℕ :=
⟨fun n ↦ ENNReal.ofReal (geometricPMFReal p n), by
apply ENNReal.hasSum_coe.mpr
rw [← toNNReal_one]
exact (geometricPMFRealSum hp_pos hp_le_one).toNNReal
(fun n ↦ geometricPMFReal_nonneg hp_pos hp_le_one)⟩
| /-- The geometric pmf is measurable. -/
@[measurability]
lemma measurable_geometricPMFReal : Measurable (geometricPMFReal p) := by
measurability
| Mathlib/Probability/Distributions/Geometric.lean | 69 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.Minor.Restrict
/-!
# Some constructions of matroids
This file defines some very elementary examples of matroids, namely those with at most one base.
## Main definitions
* `emptyOn α` is the matroid on `α` with empty ground set.
For `E : Set α`, ...
* `loopyOn E` is the matroid on `E` whose elements are all loops, or equivalently in which `∅`
is the only base.
* `freeOn E` is the 'free matroid' whose ground set `E` is the only base.
* For `I ⊆ E`, `uniqueBaseOn I E` is the matroid with ground set `E` in which `I` is the only base.
## Implementation details
To avoid the tedious process of certifying the matroid axioms for each of these easy examples,
we bootstrap the definitions starting with `emptyOn α` (which `simp` can prove is a matroid)
and then construct the other examples using duality and restriction.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {E B I X R J : Set α}
namespace Matroid
open Set
section EmptyOn
/-- The `Matroid α` with empty ground set. -/
def emptyOn (α : Type*) : Matroid α where
E := ∅
IsBase := (· = ∅)
Indep := (· = ∅)
indep_iff' := by simp [subset_empty_iff]
exists_isBase := ⟨∅, rfl⟩
isBase_exchange := by rintro _ _ rfl; simp
maximality := by rintro _ _ _ rfl -; exact ⟨∅, by simp [Maximal]⟩
subset_ground := by simp
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_ground : (emptyOn α).E = ∅ := rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_isBase_iff : (emptyOn α).IsBase B ↔ B = ∅ := Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_indep_iff : (emptyOn α).Indep I ↔ I = ∅ := Iff.rfl
theorem ground_eq_empty_iff : (M.E = ∅) ↔ M = emptyOn α := by
simp only [emptyOn, ext_iff_indep, iff_self_and]
exact fun h ↦ by simp [h, subset_empty_iff]
@[simp] theorem emptyOn_dual_eq : (emptyOn α)✶ = emptyOn α := by
rw [← ground_eq_empty_iff]; rfl
@[simp] theorem restrict_empty (M : Matroid α) : M ↾ (∅ : Set α) = emptyOn α := by
| simp [← ground_eq_empty_iff]
theorem eq_emptyOn_or_nonempty (M : Matroid α) : M = emptyOn α ∨ Matroid.Nonempty M := by
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Constructions.lean | 67 | 69 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalities
import Mathlib.Analysis.MeanInequalitiesPow
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.SpecialFunctions.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Lebesgue.Add
/-!
# Mean value inequalities for integrals
In this file we prove several inequalities on integrals, notably the Hölder inequality and
the Minkowski inequality. The versions for finite sums are in `Analysis.MeanInequalities`.
## Main results
Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of `ℝ≥0∞` and `ℝ≥0` functions: we prove
`∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q` conjugate real exponents
and `α → (E)NNReal` functions in two cases,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `NNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
`ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le` is a variant where the exponents are not reciprocals:
`∫ (f ^ p * g ^ q) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f ∂μ) ^ p * (∫ g ∂μ) ^ q` where `p, q ≥ 0` and `p + q = 1`.
`ENNReal.lintegral_prod_norm_pow_le` generalizes this to a finite family of functions:
`∫ (∏ i, f i ^ p i) ∂μ ≤ ∏ i, (∫ f i ∂μ) ^ p i` when the `p` is a collection
of nonnegative weights with sum 1.
Minkowski's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of measurable functions with `ℝ≥0∞` values:
we prove `(∫ (f + g)^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) + (∫ g^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p)` for `1 ≤ p`.
-/
section LIntegral
/-!
### Hölder's inequality for the Lebesgue integral of ℝ≥0∞ and ℝ≥0 functions
We prove `∫ (f * g) ∂μ ≤ (∫ f^p ∂μ) ^ (1/p) * (∫ g^q ∂μ) ^ (1/q)` for `p`, `q`
conjugate real exponents and `α → (E)NNReal` functions in several cases, the first two being useful
only to prove the more general results:
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are equal to 1,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top` : ℝ≥0∞ functions for which the
integrals on the right are neither ⊤ nor 0,
* `ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0∞ functions,
* `NNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq` : ℝ≥0 functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open NNReal ENNReal MeasureTheory Finset
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
namespace ENNReal
theorem lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_norm : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = 1)
(hg_norm : ∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = 1) : (∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤ 1 := by
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤
∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p / ENNReal.ofReal p + g a ^ q / ENNReal.ofReal q ∂μ :=
lintegral_mono fun a => young_inequality (f a) (g a) hpq
_ = 1 := by
simp only [div_eq_mul_inv]
rw [lintegral_add_left']
· rw [lintegral_mul_const'' _ (hf.pow_const p), lintegral_mul_const', hf_norm, hg_norm,
one_mul, one_mul, hpq.inv_add_inv_ennreal]
simp [hpq.symm.pos]
· exact (hf.pow_const _).mul_const _
/-- Function multiplied by the inverse of its p-seminorm `(∫⁻ f^p ∂μ) ^ 1/p` -/
def funMulInvSnorm (f : α → ℝ≥0∞) (p : ℝ) (μ : Measure α) : α → ℝ≥0∞ := fun a =>
f a * ((∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹
theorem fun_eq_funMulInvSnorm_mul_eLpNorm {p : ℝ} (f : α → ℝ≥0∞)
(hf_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ 0) (hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) {a : α} :
f a = funMulInvSnorm f p μ a * (∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
simp [funMulInvSnorm, mul_assoc, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel, hf_nonzero, hf_top]
theorem funMulInvSnorm_rpow {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞} {a : α} :
funMulInvSnorm f p μ a ^ p = f a ^ p * (∫⁻ c, f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ := by
rw [funMulInvSnorm, mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (le_of_lt hp0)]
suffices h_inv_rpow : ((∫⁻ c : α, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))⁻¹ ^ p = (∫⁻ c : α, f c ^ p ∂μ)⁻¹ by
rw [h_inv_rpow]
rw [inv_rpow, ← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hp0.ne', rpow_one]
theorem lintegral_rpow_funMulInvSnorm_eq_one {p : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ 0) (hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) :
∫⁻ c, funMulInvSnorm f p μ c ^ p ∂μ = 1 := by
simp_rw [funMulInvSnorm_rpow hp0_lt]
rw [lintegral_mul_const', ENNReal.mul_inv_cancel hf_nonzero hf_top]
rwa [inv_ne_top]
/-- Hölder's inequality in case of finite non-zero integrals -/
theorem lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_nontop : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤)
(hg_nontop : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) (hf_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ 0)
(hg_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ≠ 0) :
(∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
let npf := (∫⁻ c : α, f c ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)
let nqg := (∫⁻ c : α, g c ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q)
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ∂μ) =
∫⁻ a : α, (funMulInvSnorm f p μ * funMulInvSnorm g q μ) a * (npf * nqg) ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_congr fun a => ?_
rw [Pi.mul_apply, fun_eq_funMulInvSnorm_mul_eLpNorm f hf_nonzero hf_nontop,
fun_eq_funMulInvSnorm_mul_eLpNorm g hg_nonzero hg_nontop, Pi.mul_apply]
ring
_ ≤ npf * nqg := by
rw [lintegral_mul_const' (npf * nqg) _
(by simp [npf, nqg, hf_nontop, hg_nontop, hf_nonzero, hg_nonzero, ENNReal.mul_eq_top])]
refine mul_le_of_le_one_left' ?_
have hf1 := lintegral_rpow_funMulInvSnorm_eq_one hpq.pos hf_nonzero hf_nontop
have hg1 := lintegral_rpow_funMulInvSnorm_eq_one hpq.symm.pos hg_nonzero hg_nontop
exact lintegral_mul_le_one_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_one hpq (hf.mul_const _) hf1 hg1
theorem ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 ≤ p) {f : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = 0) : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := by
rw [lintegral_eq_zero_iff' (hf.pow_const p)] at hf_zero
filter_upwards [hf_zero] with x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← not_imp_not]
exact fun hx => (rpow_pos_of_nonneg (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 hx) hp0).ne'
theorem lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero {p : ℝ} (hp0 : 0 ≤ p) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = 0) : (∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) = 0 := by
rw [← @lintegral_zero_fun α _ μ]
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
suffices h_mul_zero : f * g =ᵐ[μ] 0 * g by rwa [zero_mul] at h_mul_zero
have hf_eq_zero : f =ᵐ[μ] 0 := ae_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hp0 hf hf_zero
exact hf_eq_zero.mul (ae_eq_refl g)
theorem lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top {p q : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p) (hq0 : 0 ≤ q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf_top : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = ⊤) (hg_nonzero : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ≠ 0) :
(∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
refine le_trans le_top (le_of_eq ?_)
have hp0_inv_lt : 0 < 1 / p := by simp [hp0_lt]
rw [hf_top, ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos hp0_inv_lt]
simp [hq0, hg_nonzero]
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq (μ : Measure α) {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q)
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
by_cases hf_zero : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = 0
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (zero_le _)
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.nonneg hf hf_zero
by_cases hg_zero : ∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = 0
· refine Eq.trans_le ?_ (zero_le _)
rw [mul_comm]
exact lintegral_mul_eq_zero_of_lintegral_rpow_eq_zero hpq.symm.nonneg hg hg_zero
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = ⊤
· exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.pos hpq.symm.nonneg hf_top hg_zero
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, g a ^ q ∂μ = ⊤
· rw [mul_comm, mul_comm ((∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p))]
exact lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_eq_top hpq.symm.pos hpq.nonneg hg_top hf_zero
-- non-⊤ non-zero case
exact ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq_of_ne_zero_of_ne_top hpq hf hf_top hg_top hf_zero hg_zero
/-- A different formulation of Hölder's inequality for two functions, with two exponents that sum to
1, instead of reciprocals of -/
theorem lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le {α} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
{f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
{p q : ℝ} (hp : 0 ≤ p) (hq : 0 ≤ q) (hpq : p + q = 1) :
∫⁻ a, f a ^ p * g a ^ q ∂μ ≤ (∫⁻ a, f a ∂μ) ^ p * (∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ) ^ q := by
rcases hp.eq_or_lt with rfl|hp
· rw [zero_add] at hpq
simp [hpq]
rcases hq.eq_or_lt with rfl|hq
· rw [add_zero] at hpq
simp [hpq]
have h2p : 1 < 1 / p := by
rw [one_div, one_lt_inv₀ hp]
linarith
have h2pq : (1 / p)⁻¹ + (1 / q)⁻¹ = 1 := by simp [hp.ne', hq.ne', hpq]
have := ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ (Real.holderConjugate_iff.mpr ⟨h2p, h2pq⟩)
(hf.pow_const p) (hg.pow_const q)
simpa [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, hp.ne', hq.ne'] using this
/-- A version of Hölder with multiple arguments -/
theorem lintegral_prod_norm_pow_le {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
(s : Finset ι) {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f i) μ)
{p : ι → ℝ} (hp : ∑ i ∈ s, p i = 1) (h2p : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ p i) :
∫⁻ a, ∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ p i ∂μ ≤ ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ p i := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction generalizing p with
| empty =>
simp at hp
| insert i₀ s hi₀ ih =>
rcases eq_or_ne (p i₀) 1 with h2i₀|h2i₀
· simp only [hi₀, not_false_eq_true, prod_insert]
have h2p : ∀ i ∈ s, p i = 0 := by
simpa [hi₀, h2i₀, sum_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg (fun i hi ↦ h2p i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi)]
using hp
calc ∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ p i ∂μ
= ∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, 1 ∂μ := by
congr! 3 with x
apply prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [h2p i hi, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
_ ≤ (∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ∂μ) ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, 1 := by simp [h2i₀]
_ = (∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ∂μ) ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ p i := by
congr 1
apply prod_congr rfl fun i hi ↦ by rw [h2p i hi, ENNReal.rpow_zero]
· have hpi₀ : 0 ≤ 1 - p i₀ := by
simp_rw [sub_nonneg, ← hp, single_le_sum h2p (mem_insert_self ..)]
have h2pi₀ : 1 - p i₀ ≠ 0 := by
rwa [sub_ne_zero, ne_comm]
let q := fun i ↦ p i / (1 - p i₀)
have hq : ∑ i ∈ s, q i = 1 := by
rw [← Finset.sum_div, ← sum_insert_sub hi₀, hp, div_self h2pi₀]
have h2q : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ q i :=
fun i hi ↦ div_nonneg (h2p i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi) hpi₀
calc ∫⁻ a, ∏ i ∈ insert i₀ s, f i a ^ p i ∂μ
= ∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ p i ∂μ := by simp [hi₀]
_ = ∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ^ p i₀ * (∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ q i) ^ (1 - p i₀) ∂μ := by
simp [q, ← ENNReal.prod_rpow_of_nonneg hpi₀, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
div_mul_cancel₀ (h := h2pi₀)]
_ ≤ (∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ∂μ) ^ p i₀ * (∫⁻ a, ∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ q i ∂μ) ^ (1 - p i₀) := by
apply ENNReal.lintegral_mul_norm_pow_le
· exact hf i₀ <| mem_insert_self ..
· exact s.aemeasurable_prod fun i hi ↦ (hf i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi).pow_const _
· exact h2p i₀ <| mem_insert_self ..
· exact hpi₀
· apply add_sub_cancel
_ ≤ (∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ∂μ) ^ p i₀ * (∏ i ∈ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ q i) ^ (1 - p i₀) := by
gcongr -- behavior of gcongr is heartbeat-dependent, which makes code really fragile...
exact ih (fun i hi ↦ hf i <| mem_insert_of_mem hi) hq h2q
_ = (∫⁻ a, f i₀ a ∂μ) ^ p i₀ * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ p i := by
simp [q, ← ENNReal.prod_rpow_of_nonneg hpi₀, ← ENNReal.rpow_mul,
div_mul_cancel₀ (h := h2pi₀)]
_ = ∏ i ∈ insert i₀ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ p i := by simp [hi₀]
/-- A version of Hölder with multiple arguments, one of which plays a distinguished role. -/
theorem lintegral_mul_prod_norm_pow_le {α ι : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {μ : Measure α}
(s : Finset ι) {g : α → ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → ℝ≥0∞} (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hf : ∀ i ∈ s, AEMeasurable (f i) μ) (q : ℝ) {p : ι → ℝ} (hpq : q + ∑ i ∈ s, p i = 1)
(hq : 0 ≤ q) (hp : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ p i) :
∫⁻ a, g a ^ q * ∏ i ∈ s, f i a ^ p i ∂μ ≤
(∫⁻ a, g a ∂μ) ^ q * ∏ i ∈ s, (∫⁻ a, f i a ∂μ) ^ p i := by
suffices
∫⁻ t, ∏ j ∈ insertNone s, Option.elim j (g t) (fun j ↦ f j t) ^ Option.elim j q p ∂μ
≤ ∏ j ∈ insertNone s, (∫⁻ t, Option.elim j (g t) (fun j ↦ f j t) ∂μ) ^ Option.elim j q p by
simpa using this
refine ENNReal.lintegral_prod_norm_pow_le _ ?_ ?_ ?_
· rintro (_|i) hi
· exact hg
· refine hf i ?_
simpa using hi
· simp_rw [sum_insertNone, Option.elim]
exact hpq
· rintro (_|i) hi
· exact hq
· refine hp i ?_
simpa using hi
theorem lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top {p : ℝ} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) < ⊤) (hg_top : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) < ⊤)
(hp1 : 1 ≤ p) : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) < ⊤ := by
have hp0_lt : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p := le_of_lt hp0_lt
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, (f a + g a) ^ p ∂μ) ≤
∫⁻ a, (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) * f a ^ p + (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) * g a ^ p ∂μ := by
refine lintegral_mono fun a => ?_
dsimp only
have h_zero_lt_half_rpow : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) < (1 / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p := by
rw [← ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos hp0_lt]
exact ENNReal.rpow_lt_rpow (by simp [zero_lt_one]) hp0_lt
have h_rw : (1 / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p * (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) = 1 / 2 := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ENNReal.rpow_add _ _ two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ← mul_assoc, ←
ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, one_div,
ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top, ENNReal.one_rpow, one_mul,
ENNReal.rpow_neg_one]
rw [← ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left (ne_of_lt h_zero_lt_half_rpow).symm _]
· rw [mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, h_rw, ← ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0, mul_add]
refine
ENNReal.rpow_arith_mean_le_arith_mean2_rpow (1 / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) (1 / 2 : ℝ≥0∞) (f a) (g a) ?_
hp1
rw [ENNReal.div_add_div_same, one_add_one_eq_two,
ENNReal.div_self two_ne_zero ENNReal.coe_ne_top]
· rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top]
refine ENNReal.rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg hp0 ?_
rw [one_div, ENNReal.inv_ne_top]
exact two_ne_zero
_ < ⊤ := by
have h_two : (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (p - 1) ≠ ⊤ :=
ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg (by simp [hp1]) ENNReal.coe_ne_top
rw [lintegral_add_left', lintegral_const_mul'' _ (hf.pow_const p),
lintegral_const_mul' _ _ h_two, ENNReal.add_lt_top]
· exact ⟨ENNReal.mul_lt_top h_two.lt_top hf_top, ENNReal.mul_lt_top h_two.lt_top hg_top⟩
· exact (hf.pow_const p).const_mul _
theorem lintegral_Lp_mul_le_Lq_mul_Lr {α} [MeasurableSpace α] {p q r : ℝ} (hp0_lt : 0 < p)
(hpq : p < q) (hpqr : 1 / p = 1 / q + 1 / r) (μ : Measure α) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∫⁻ a, f a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) * (∫⁻ a, g a ^ r ∂μ) ^ (1 / r) := by
have hp0_ne : p ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt hp0_lt).symm
have hp0 : 0 ≤ p := le_of_lt hp0_lt
have hq0_lt : 0 < q := lt_of_le_of_lt hp0 hpq
have hq0_ne : q ≠ 0 := (ne_of_lt hq0_lt).symm
have h_one_div_r : 1 / r = 1 / p - 1 / q := by rw [hpqr]; simp
let p2 := q / p
let q2 := p2.conjExponent
have hp2q2 : p2.HolderConjugate q2 :=
.conjExponent (by simp [p2, q2, _root_.lt_div_iff₀, hpq, hp0_lt])
calc
(∫⁻ a : α, (f * g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) = (∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p * g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ hp0]
_ ≤ ((∫⁻ a, f a ^ (p * p2) ∂μ) ^ (1 / p2) *
(∫⁻ a, g a ^ (p * q2) ∂μ) ^ (1 / q2)) ^ (1 / p) := by
gcongr
simp_rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul]
exact ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hp2q2 (hf.pow_const _) (hg.pow_const _)
_ = (∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) * (∫⁻ a : α, g a ^ r ∂μ) ^ (1 / r) := by
rw [@ENNReal.mul_rpow_of_nonneg _ _ (1 / p) (by simp [hp0]), ← ENNReal.rpow_mul, ←
ENNReal.rpow_mul]
have hpp2 : p * p2 = q := by
symm
rw [mul_comm, ← div_eq_iff hp0_ne]
have hpq2 : p * q2 = r := by
rw [← inv_inv r, ← one_div, ← one_div, h_one_div_r]
field_simp [p2, q2, Real.conjExponent, hp0_ne, hq0_ne]
simp_rw [div_mul_div_comm, mul_one, mul_comm p2, mul_comm q2, hpp2, hpq2]
theorem lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) :
(∫⁻ a, f a * g a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ) ≤
(∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
refine le_trans (ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf (hg.pow_const _)) ?_
by_cases hf_zero_rpow : (∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) = 0
· rw [hf_zero_rpow, zero_mul]
exact zero_le _
have hf_top_rpow : (∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≠ ⊤ := by
by_contra h
refine hf_top ?_
have hp_not_neg : ¬p < 0 := by simp [hpq.nonneg]
simpa [hpq.pos, hp_not_neg] using h
refine (ENNReal.mul_le_mul_left hf_zero_rpow hf_top_rpow).mpr (le_of_eq ?_)
congr
ext1 a
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_mul, hpq.sub_one_mul_conj]
theorem lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_eLpNorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add {p q : ℝ}
(hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ)
(hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) (hg_top : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) :
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≤
((∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) *
(∫⁻ a, (f a + g a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
calc
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≤ ∫⁻ a, (f + g) a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ := by
gcongr with a
by_cases h_zero : (f + g) a = 0
· rw [h_zero, ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos hpq.pos]
exact zero_le _
by_cases h_top : (f + g) a = ⊤
· rw [h_top, ENNReal.top_rpow_of_pos hpq.sub_one_pos, ENNReal.top_mul_top]
exact le_top
refine le_of_eq ?_
nth_rw 2 [← ENNReal.rpow_one ((f + g) a)]
rw [← ENNReal.rpow_add _ _ h_zero h_top, add_sub_cancel]
_ = (∫⁻ a : α, f a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a : α, g a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ := by
have h_add_m : AEMeasurable (fun a : α => (f + g) a ^ (p - 1 : ℝ)) μ :=
(hf.add hg).pow_const _
have h_add_apply :
(∫⁻ a : α, (f + g) a * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ) =
∫⁻ a : α, (f a + g a) * (f + g) a ^ (p - 1) ∂μ :=
rfl
simp_rw [h_add_apply, add_mul]
rw [lintegral_add_left' (hf.mul h_add_m)]
_ ≤
((∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) *
(∫⁻ a, (f a + g a) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
rw [add_mul]
gcongr
· exact lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hf (hf.add hg) hf_top
· exact lintegral_mul_rpow_le_lintegral_rpow_mul_lintegral_rpow hpq hg (hf.add hg) hg_top
private theorem lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hf_top : (∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hg_top : (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) (h_add_zero : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ 0)
(h_add_top : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤) :
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
have hp_not_nonpos : ¬p ≤ 0 := by simp [hpq.pos]
have htop_rpow : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≠ ⊤ := by
by_contra h
exact h_add_top (@ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg _ (1 / p) (by simp [hpq.nonneg]) h)
have h0_rpow : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≠ 0 := by
simp [h_add_zero, h_add_top, hpq.nonneg, hp_not_nonpos, -Pi.add_apply]
suffices h :
1 ≤
(∫⁻ a : α, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (-(1 / p)) *
((∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a : α, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) by
rwa [← mul_le_mul_left h0_rpow htop_rpow, ← mul_assoc, ← rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top, ←
sub_eq_add_neg, _root_.sub_self, rpow_zero, one_mul, mul_one] at h
have h :
(∫⁻ a : α, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≤
((∫⁻ a : α, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a : α, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) *
(∫⁻ a : α, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) :=
lintegral_rpow_add_le_add_eLpNorm_mul_lintegral_rpow_add hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top
have h_one_div_q : 1 / q = 1 - 1 / p := by
nth_rw 2 [← hpq.inv_add_inv_eq_one]
ring
simp_rw [h_one_div_q, sub_eq_add_neg 1 (1 / p), ENNReal.rpow_add _ _ h_add_zero h_add_top,
rpow_one] at h
conv_rhs at h => enter [2]; rw [mul_comm]
conv_lhs at h => rw [← one_mul (∫⁻ a : α, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ)]
rwa [← mul_assoc, ENNReal.mul_le_mul_right h_add_zero h_add_top, mul_comm] at h
/-- **Minkowski's inequality for functions** `α → ℝ≥0∞`: the `ℒp` seminorm of the sum of two
functions is bounded by the sum of their `ℒp` seminorms. -/
theorem lintegral_Lp_add_le {p : ℝ} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ)
(hp1 : 1 ≤ p) :
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
have hp_pos : 0 < p := lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1
by_cases hf_top : ∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ = ⊤
· simp [hf_top, hp_pos]
by_cases hg_top : ∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ = ⊤
· simp [hg_top, hp_pos]
by_cases h1 : p = 1
· refine le_of_eq ?_
simp_rw [h1, one_div_one, ENNReal.rpow_one]
exact lintegral_add_left' hf _
have hp1_lt : 1 < p := by
refine lt_of_le_of_ne hp1 ?_
symm
exact h1
have hpq := Real.HolderConjugate.conjExponent hp1_lt
by_cases h0 : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) = 0
· rw [h0, @ENNReal.zero_rpow_of_pos (1 / p) (by simp [lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp1])]
exact zero_le _
have htop : (∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ≠ ⊤ := by
rw [← Ne] at hf_top hg_top
rw [← lt_top_iff_ne_top] at hf_top hg_top ⊢
exact lintegral_rpow_add_lt_top_of_lintegral_rpow_lt_top hf hf_top hg_top hp1
exact lintegral_Lp_add_le_aux hpq hf hf_top hg hg_top h0 htop
/-- Variant of Minkowski's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0∞` in `ℒp` with `p ≤ 1`: the `ℒp`
seminorm of the sum of two functions is bounded by a constant multiple of the sum
of their `ℒp` seminorms. -/
theorem lintegral_Lp_add_le_of_le_one {p : ℝ} {f g : α → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hp0 : 0 ≤ p)
(hp1 : p ≤ 1) :
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤
(2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p - 1) * ((∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le hp0 with (rfl | hp)
· simp only [Pi.add_apply, rpow_zero, lintegral_one, _root_.div_zero, zero_sub]
norm_num
rw [rpow_neg, rpow_one, ENNReal.inv_mul_cancel two_ne_zero ofNat_ne_top]
calc
(∫⁻ a, (f + g) a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) ≤ ((∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) + ∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) := by
rw [← lintegral_add_left' (hf.pow_const p)]
gcongr with a
exact rpow_add_le_add_rpow _ _ hp0 hp1
_ ≤ (2 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ (1 / p - 1) * ((∫⁻ a, f a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) + (∫⁻ a, g a ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p)) :=
rpow_add_le_mul_rpow_add_rpow _ _ ((one_le_div hp).2 hp1)
end ENNReal
/-- Hölder's inequality for functions `α → ℝ≥0`. The integral of the product of two functions
is bounded by the product of their `ℒp` and `ℒq` seminorms when `p` and `q` are conjugate
exponents. -/
theorem NNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq {p q : ℝ} (hpq : p.HolderConjugate q) {f g : α → ℝ≥0}
(hf : AEMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEMeasurable g μ) :
(∫⁻ a, (f * g) a ∂μ) ≤
(∫⁻ a, (f a : ℝ≥0∞) ^ p ∂μ) ^ (1 / p) * (∫⁻ a, (g a : ℝ≥0∞) ^ q ∂μ) ^ (1 / q) := by
simp_rw [Pi.mul_apply, ENNReal.coe_mul]
exact ENNReal.lintegral_mul_le_Lp_mul_Lq μ hpq hf.coe_nnreal_ennreal hg.coe_nnreal_ennreal
end
end LIntegral
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/MeanInequalities.lean | 490 | 495 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Junyan Xu. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Junyan Xu
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Sym.Sym2
import Mathlib.Logic.Relation
/-!
# Game addition relation
This file defines, given relations `rα : α → α → Prop` and `rβ : β → β → Prop`, a relation
`Prod.GameAdd` on pairs, such that `GameAdd rα rβ x y` iff `x` can be reached from `y` by
decreasing either entry (with respect to `rα` and `rβ`). It is so called since it models the
subsequency relation on the addition of combinatorial games.
We also define `Sym2.GameAdd`, which is the unordered pair analog of `Prod.GameAdd`.
## Main definitions and results
- `Prod.GameAdd`: the game addition relation on ordered pairs.
- `WellFounded.prod_gameAdd`: formalizes induction on ordered pairs, where exactly one entry
decreases at a time.
- `Sym2.GameAdd`: the game addition relation on unordered pairs.
- `WellFounded.sym2_gameAdd`: formalizes induction on unordered pairs, where exactly one entry
decreases at a time.
-/
variable {α β : Type*} {rα : α → α → Prop} {rβ : β → β → Prop} {a : α} {b : β}
/-! ### `Prod.GameAdd` -/
namespace Prod
variable (rα rβ)
/-- `Prod.GameAdd rα rβ x y` means that `x` can be reached from `y` by decreasing either entry with
respect to the relations `rα` and `rβ`.
It is so called, as it models game addition within combinatorial game theory. If `rα a₁ a₂` means
that `a₂ ⟶ a₁` is a valid move in game `α`, and `rβ b₁ b₂` means that `b₂ ⟶ b₁` is a valid move
in game `β`, then `GameAdd rα rβ` specifies the valid moves in the juxtaposition of `α` and `β`:
the player is free to choose one of the games and make a move in it, while leaving the other game
unchanged.
See `Sym2.GameAdd` for the unordered pair analog. -/
inductive GameAdd : α × β → α × β → Prop
| fst {a₁ a₂ b} : rα a₁ a₂ → GameAdd (a₁, b) (a₂, b)
| snd {a b₁ b₂} : rβ b₁ b₂ → GameAdd (a, b₁) (a, b₂)
theorem gameAdd_iff {rα rβ} {x y : α × β} :
GameAdd rα rβ x y ↔ rα x.1 y.1 ∧ x.2 = y.2 ∨ rβ x.2 y.2 ∧ x.1 = y.1 := by
constructor
· rintro (@⟨a₁, a₂, b, h⟩ | @⟨a, b₁, b₂, h⟩)
exacts [Or.inl ⟨h, rfl⟩, Or.inr ⟨h, rfl⟩]
· revert x y
rintro ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ (⟨h, rfl : b₁ = b₂⟩ | ⟨h, rfl : a₁ = a₂⟩)
exacts [GameAdd.fst h, GameAdd.snd h]
theorem gameAdd_mk_iff {rα rβ} {a₁ a₂ : α} {b₁ b₂ : β} :
GameAdd rα rβ (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) ↔ rα a₁ a₂ ∧ b₁ = b₂ ∨ rβ b₁ b₂ ∧ a₁ = a₂ :=
gameAdd_iff
@[simp]
theorem gameAdd_swap_swap : ∀ a b : α × β, GameAdd rβ rα a.swap b.swap ↔ GameAdd rα rβ a b :=
fun ⟨a₁, b₁⟩ ⟨a₂, b₂⟩ => by rw [Prod.swap, Prod.swap, gameAdd_mk_iff, gameAdd_mk_iff, or_comm]
theorem gameAdd_swap_swap_mk (a₁ a₂ : α) (b₁ b₂ : β) :
GameAdd rα rβ (a₁, b₁) (a₂, b₂) ↔ GameAdd rβ rα (b₁, a₁) (b₂, a₂) :=
gameAdd_swap_swap rβ rα (b₁, a₁) (b₂, a₂)
/-- `Prod.GameAdd` is a subrelation of `Prod.Lex`. -/
theorem gameAdd_le_lex : GameAdd rα rβ ≤ Prod.Lex rα rβ := fun _ _ h =>
h.rec (Prod.Lex.left _ _) (Prod.Lex.right _)
/-- `Prod.RProd` is a subrelation of the transitive closure of `Prod.GameAdd`. -/
theorem rprod_le_transGen_gameAdd : RProd rα rβ ≤ Relation.TransGen (GameAdd rα rβ)
| _, _, h => h.rec (by
intro _ _ _ _ hα hβ
exact Relation.TransGen.tail (Relation.TransGen.single <| GameAdd.fst hα) (GameAdd.snd hβ))
end Prod
/-- If `a` is accessible under `rα` and `b` is accessible under `rβ`, then `(a, b)` is
accessible under `Prod.GameAdd rα rβ`. Notice that `Prod.lexAccessible` requires the
stronger condition `∀ b, Acc rβ b`. -/
theorem Acc.prod_gameAdd (ha : Acc rα a) (hb : Acc rβ b) :
Acc (Prod.GameAdd rα rβ) (a, b) := by
induction' ha with a _ iha generalizing b
induction' hb with b hb ihb
refine Acc.intro _ fun h => ?_
rintro (⟨ra⟩ | ⟨rb⟩)
exacts [iha _ ra (Acc.intro b hb), ihb _ rb]
/-- The `Prod.GameAdd` relation on well-founded inputs is well-founded.
|
In particular, the sum of two well-founded games is well-founded. -/
theorem WellFounded.prod_gameAdd (hα : WellFounded rα) (hβ : WellFounded rβ) :
WellFounded (Prod.GameAdd rα rβ) :=
⟨fun ⟨a, b⟩ => (hα.apply a).prod_gameAdd (hβ.apply b)⟩
namespace Prod
| Mathlib/Order/GameAdd.lean | 99 | 105 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Manifold.VectorBundle.Basic
/-! # Tangent bundles
This file defines the tangent bundle as a `C^n` vector bundle.
Let `M` be a manifold with model `I` on `(E, H)`. The tangent space `TangentSpace I (x : M)` has
already been defined as a type synonym for `E`, and the tangent bundle `TangentBundle I M` as an
abbrev of `Bundle.TotalSpace E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _)`.
In this file, when `M` is `C^1`, we construct a vector bundle structure
on `TangentBundle I M` using the `VectorBundleCore` construction indexed by the charts of `M`
with fibers `E`. Given two charts `i, j : PartialHomeomorph M H`, the coordinate change
between `i` and `j` at a point `x : M` is the derivative of the composite
```
I.symm i.symm j I
E -----> H -----> M --> H --> E
```
within the set `range I ⊆ E` at `I (i x) : E`.
This defines a vector bundle `TangentBundle` with fibers `TangentSpace`.
## Main definitions and results
* `tangentBundleCore I M` is the vector bundle core for the tangent bundle over `M`.
* When `M` is a `C^{n+1}` manifold, `TangentBundle I M` has a `C^n` vector bundle
structure over `M`. In particular, it is a topological space, a vector bundle, a fiber bundle,
and a `C^n` manifold.
-/
open Bundle Set IsManifold PartialHomeomorph ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped Manifold Topology Bundle ContDiff
noncomputable section
section General
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜] {n : WithTop ℕ∞} {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
[NormedSpace 𝕜 E] {E' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] {H : Type*}
[TopologicalSpace H] {I : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E H} {H' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace H']
{I' : ModelWithCorners 𝕜 E' H'} {M : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M] [ChartedSpace H M]
{M' : Type*} [TopologicalSpace M'] [ChartedSpace H' M']
{F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
/-- Auxiliary lemma for tangent spaces: the derivative of a coordinate change between two charts is
`C^n` on its source. -/
theorem contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change [IsManifold I (n + 1) M]
(i j : atlas H M) :
ContDiffOn 𝕜 n (fderivWithin 𝕜 (j.1.extend I ∘ (i.1.extend I).symm) (range I))
((i.1.extend I).symm ≫ j.1.extend I).source := by
have h : ((i.1.extend I).symm ≫ j.1.extend I).source ⊆ range I := by
rw [i.1.extend_coord_change_source]; apply image_subset_range
intro x hx
refine (ContDiffWithinAt.fderivWithin_right ?_ I.uniqueDiffOn le_rfl
<| h hx).mono h
refine (PartialHomeomorph.contDiffOn_extend_coord_change (subset_maximalAtlas j.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas i.2) x hx).mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin ?_
exact i.1.extend_coord_change_source_mem_nhdsWithin j.1 hx
open IsManifold
variable [IsManifold I 1 M] [IsManifold I' 1 M']
variable (I M) in
/-- Let `M` be a `C^1` manifold with model `I` on `(E, H)`.
Then `tangentBundleCore I M` is the vector bundle core for the tangent bundle over `M`.
It is indexed by the atlas of `M`, with fiber `E` and its change of coordinates from the chart `i`
to the chart `j` at point `x : M` is the derivative of the composite
```
I.symm i.symm j I
E -----> H -----> M --> H --> E
```
within the set `range I ⊆ E` at `I (i x) : E`. -/
@[simps indexAt coordChange]
def tangentBundleCore : VectorBundleCore 𝕜 M E (atlas H M) where
baseSet i := i.1.source
isOpen_baseSet i := i.1.open_source
indexAt := achart H
mem_baseSet_at := mem_chart_source H
coordChange i j x :=
fderivWithin 𝕜 (j.1.extend I ∘ (i.1.extend I).symm) (range I) (i.1.extend I x)
coordChange_self i x hx v := by
rw [Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq, fderivWithin_id', ContinuousLinearMap.id_apply]
· exact I.uniqueDiffWithinAt_image
· filter_upwards [i.1.extend_target_mem_nhdsWithin hx] with y hy
exact (i.1.extend I).right_inv hy
· simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hx]
continuousOn_coordChange i j := by
have : IsManifold I (0 + 1) M := by simp; infer_instance
refine (contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change (n := 0) i j).continuousOn.comp
(i.1.continuousOn_extend.mono ?_) ?_
· rw [i.1.extend_source]; exact inter_subset_left
simp_rw [← i.1.extend_image_source_inter, mapsTo_image]
coordChange_comp := by
have : IsManifold I (0 + 1) M := by simp; infer_instance
rintro i j k x ⟨⟨hxi, hxj⟩, hxk⟩ v
rw [fderivWithin_fderivWithin, Filter.EventuallyEq.fderivWithin_eq]
· have := i.1.extend_preimage_mem_nhds (I := I) hxi (j.1.extend_source_mem_nhds (I := I) hxj)
filter_upwards [nhdsWithin_le_nhds this] with y hy
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, (j.1.extend I).left_inv hy]
· simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hxi, j.1.extend_left_inv hxj]
· exact (contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' (subset_maximalAtlas k.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas j.2) hxk hxj).differentiableWithinAt le_rfl
· exact (contDiffWithinAt_extend_coord_change' (subset_maximalAtlas j.2)
(subset_maximalAtlas i.2) hxj hxi).differentiableWithinAt le_rfl
· intro x _; exact mem_range_self _
· exact I.uniqueDiffWithinAt_image
· rw [Function.comp_apply, i.1.extend_left_inv hxi]
-- Porting note: moved to a separate `simp high` lemma b/c `simp` can simplify the LHS
@[simp high]
theorem tangentBundleCore_baseSet (i) : (tangentBundleCore I M).baseSet i = i.1.source := rfl
theorem tangentBundleCore_coordChange_achart (x x' z : M) :
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H x) (achart H x') z =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (extChartAt I x' ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x z) :=
rfl
section tangentCoordChange
variable (I) in
/-- In a manifold `M`, given two preferred charts indexed by `x y : M`, `tangentCoordChange I x y`
is the family of derivatives of the corresponding change-of-coordinates map. It takes junk values
outside the intersection of the sources of the two charts.
Note that this definition takes advantage of the fact that `tangentBundleCore` has the same base
sets as the preferred charts of the base manifold. -/
abbrev tangentCoordChange (x y : M) : M → E →L[𝕜] E :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H x) (achart H y)
lemma tangentCoordChange_def {x y z : M} : tangentCoordChange I x y z =
fderivWithin 𝕜 (extChartAt I y ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (range I) (extChartAt I x z) := rfl
lemma tangentCoordChange_self {x z : M} {v : E} (h : z ∈ (extChartAt I x).source) :
tangentCoordChange I x x z v = v := by
apply (tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange_self
rw [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
exact h
lemma tangentCoordChange_comp {w x y z : M} {v : E}
(h : z ∈ (extChartAt I w).source ∩ (extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) :
tangentCoordChange I x y z (tangentCoordChange I w x z v) = tangentCoordChange I w y z v := by
apply (tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange_comp
simp only [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
exact h
lemma hasFDerivWithinAt_tangentCoordChange {x y z : M}
(h : z ∈ (extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) :
HasFDerivWithinAt ((extChartAt I y) ∘ (extChartAt I x).symm) (tangentCoordChange I x y z)
(range I) (extChartAt I x z) :=
have h' : extChartAt I x z ∈ ((extChartAt I x).symm ≫ (extChartAt I y)).source := by
rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source'', PartialEquiv.symm_symm, PartialEquiv.symm_target]
exact mem_image_of_mem _ h
((contDiffWithinAt_ext_coord_change y x h').differentiableWithinAt le_rfl).hasFDerivWithinAt
lemma continuousOn_tangentCoordChange (x y : M) : ContinuousOn (tangentCoordChange I x y)
((extChartAt I x).source ∩ (extChartAt I y).source) := by
convert (tangentBundleCore I M).continuousOn_coordChange (achart H x) (achart H y) <;>
simp only [tangentBundleCore_baseSet, coe_achart, ← extChartAt_source I]
end tangentCoordChange
local notation "TM" => TangentBundle I M
section TangentBundleInstances
instance : TopologicalSpace TM :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).toTopologicalSpace
instance TangentSpace.fiberBundle : FiberBundle E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).fiberBundle
instance TangentSpace.vectorBundle : VectorBundle 𝕜 E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).vectorBundle
namespace TangentBundle
protected theorem chartAt (p : TM) :
chartAt (ModelProd H E) p =
((tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTriv (achart H p.1)).toPartialHomeomorph ≫ₕ
(chartAt H p.1).prod (PartialHomeomorph.refl E) :=
rfl
theorem chartAt_toPartialEquiv (p : TM) :
(chartAt (ModelProd H E) p).toPartialEquiv =
(tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTrivAsPartialEquiv (achart H p.1) ≫
(chartAt H p.1).toPartialEquiv.prod (PartialEquiv.refl E) :=
rfl
theorem trivializationAt_eq_localTriv (x : M) :
trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x =
(tangentBundleCore I M).toFiberBundleCore.localTriv (achart H x) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_source (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).source =
π E (TangentSpace I) ⁻¹' (chartAt H x).source :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_target (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).target = (chartAt H x).source ×ˢ univ :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_baseSet (x : M) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x).baseSet = (chartAt H x).source :=
rfl
theorem trivializationAt_apply (x : M) (z : TM) :
trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x z =
(z.1, fderivWithin 𝕜 ((chartAt H x).extend I ∘ ((chartAt H z.1).extend I).symm) (range I)
((chartAt H z.1).extend I z.1) z.2) :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_fst (x : M) (z : TM) : (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) x z).1 = z.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_chart_source_iff (p q : TM) :
p ∈ (chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).source ↔ p.1 ∈ (chartAt H q.1).source := by
simp only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, mfld_simps]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem mem_chart_target_iff (p : H × E) (q : TM) :
p ∈ (chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).target ↔ p.1 ∈ (chartAt H q.1).target := by
/- porting note: was
simp +contextual only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt,
and_iff_left_iff_imp, mfld_simps]
-/
simp only [FiberBundle.chartedSpace_chartAt, mfld_simps]
rw [PartialEquiv.prod_symm]
simp +contextual only [and_iff_left_iff_imp, mfld_simps]
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_chartAt_fst (p q : TM) : ((chartAt (ModelProd H E) q) p).1 = chartAt H q.1 p.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem coe_chartAt_symm_fst (p : H × E) (q : TM) :
((chartAt (ModelProd H E) q).symm p).1 = ((chartAt H q.1).symm : H → M) p.1 :=
rfl
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt {b₀ b : M}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).continuousLinearMapAt 𝕜 b =
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H b) (achart H b₀) b :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).localTriv_continuousLinearMapAt hb
@[simp, mfld_simps]
theorem trivializationAt_symmL {b₀ b : M}
(hb : b ∈ (trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).baseSet) :
(trivializationAt E (TangentSpace I) b₀).symmL 𝕜 b =
(tangentBundleCore I M).coordChange (achart H b₀) (achart H b) b :=
(tangentBundleCore I M).localTriv_symmL hb
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem coordChange_model_space (b b' x : F) :
(tangentBundleCore 𝓘(𝕜, F) F).coordChange (achart F b) (achart F b') x = 1 := by
simpa only [tangentBundleCore_coordChange, mfld_simps] using
fderivWithin_id uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem symmL_model_space (b b' : F) :
(trivializationAt F (TangentSpace 𝓘(𝕜, F)) b).symmL 𝕜 b' = (1 : F →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [TangentBundle.trivializationAt_symmL, coordChange_model_space]
apply mem_univ
-- Porting note: `simp` simplifies LHS to `.id _ _`
@[simp high, mfld_simps]
theorem continuousLinearMapAt_model_space (b b' : F) :
(trivializationAt F (TangentSpace 𝓘(𝕜, F)) b).continuousLinearMapAt 𝕜 b' = (1 : F →L[𝕜] F) := by
rw [TangentBundle.trivializationAt_continuousLinearMapAt, coordChange_model_space]
apply mem_univ
end TangentBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
lemma tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff [h : IsManifold I (n + 1) M] :
haveI : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
(tangentBundleCore I M).IsContMDiff I n := by
have : IsManifold I n M := .of_le (n := n + 1) (le_self_add)
refine ⟨fun i j => ?_⟩
rw [contMDiffOn_iff_source_of_mem_maximalAtlas (subset_maximalAtlas i.2),
contMDiffOn_iff_contDiffOn]
· refine ((contDiffOn_fderiv_coord_change (I := I) i j).congr fun x hx => ?_).mono ?_
· rw [PartialEquiv.trans_source'] at hx
simp_rw [Function.comp_apply, tangentBundleCore_coordChange, (i.1.extend I).right_inv hx.1]
· exact (i.1.extend_image_source_inter j.1).subset
· apply inter_subset_left
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias tangentBundleCore.isSmooth := tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
lemma TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle [h : IsManifold I (n + 1) M] :
haveI : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
ContMDiffVectorBundle n E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I 1 M := .of_le (n := n + 1) le_add_self
have : (tangentBundleCore I M).IsContMDiff I n := tangentBundleCore.isContMDiff
exact (tangentBundleCore I M).instContMDiffVectorBundle
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-09")]
alias TangentBundle.smoothVectorBundle := TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [h : IsManifold I ∞ M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle ∞ E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I (∞ + 1) M := h
exact TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [IsManifold I ω M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle ω E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I :=
TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
omit [IsManifold I 1 M] in
instance [h : IsManifold I 2 M] :
ContMDiffVectorBundle 1 E (TangentSpace I : M → Type _) I := by
have : IsManifold I (1 + 1) M := h
exact TangentBundle.contMDiffVectorBundle
|
end TangentBundleInstances
/-! ## The tangent bundle to the model space -/
| Mathlib/Geometry/Manifold/VectorBundle/Tangent.lean | 334 | 337 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.AlgebraicGeometry.EllipticCurve.Affine
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.FreeModule.Norm
import Mathlib.RingTheory.ClassGroup
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Polynomial.UniqueFactorization
/-!
# Group law on Weierstrass curves
This file proves that the nonsingular rational points on a Weierstrass curve form an abelian group
under the geometric group law defined in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`.
## Mathematical background
Let `W` be a Weierstrass curve over a field `F` given by a Weierstrass equation `W(X, Y) = 0` in
affine coordinates. As in `Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Affine.lean`, the set of
nonsingular rational points `W⟮F⟯` of `W` consist of the unique point at infinity `𝓞` and
nonsingular affine points `(x, y)`. With this description, there is an addition-preserving injection
between `W⟮F⟯` and the ideal class group of the *affine coordinate ring*
`F[W] := F[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of `W`. This is given by mapping `𝓞` to the trivial ideal class and a
nonsingular affine point `(x, y)` to the ideal class of the invertible ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩`.
Proving that this is well-defined and preserves addition reduces to equalities of integral ideals
checked in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_neg_mul` and in
`WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal` via explicit ideal computations.
Now `F[W]` is a free rank two `F[X]`-algebra with basis `{1, Y}`, so every element of `F[W]` is of
the form `p + qY` for some `p, q` in `F[X]`, and there is an algebra norm `N : F[W] → F[X]`.
Injectivity can then be shown by computing the degree of such a norm `N(p + qY)` in two different
ways, which is done in `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis` and in the
auxiliary lemmas in the proof of `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`.
## Main definitions
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing`: the coordinate ring `F[W]` of a Weierstrass curve `W`.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.basis`: the power basis of `F[W]` over `F[X]`.
## Main statements
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.instIsDomainCoordinateRing`: the affine coordinate ring
of a Weierstrass curve is an integral domain.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.CoordinateRing.degree_norm_smul_basis`: the degree of the norm of an
element in the affine coordinate ring in terms of its power basis.
* `WeierstrassCurve.Affine.Point.instAddCommGroup`: the type of nonsingular points `W⟮F⟯` in affine
coordinates forms an abelian group under addition.
## References
https://drops.dagstuhl.de/storage/00lipics/lipics-vol268-itp2023/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6/LIPIcs.ITP.2023.6.pdf
## Tags
elliptic curve, group law, class group
-/
open Ideal Polynomial
open scoped nonZeroDivisors Polynomial.Bivariate
local macro "C_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [map_ofNat, C_0, C_1, C_neg, C_add, C_sub, C_mul, C_pow])
local macro "eval_simp" : tactic =>
`(tactic| simp only [eval_C, eval_X, eval_neg, eval_add, eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_pow])
universe u v
namespace WeierstrassCurve.Affine
/-! ## Weierstrass curves in affine coordinates -/
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} [CommRing R] [CommRing S] (W : Affine R) (f : R →+* S)
-- Porting note: in Lean 3, this is a `def` under a `derive comm_ring` tag.
-- This generates a reducible instance of `comm_ring` for `coordinate_ring`. In certain
-- circumstances this might be extremely slow, because all instances in its definition are unified
-- exponentially many times. In this case, one solution is to manually add the local attribute
-- `local attribute [irreducible] coordinate_ring.comm_ring` to block this type-level unification.
-- In Lean 4, this is no longer an issue and is now an `abbrev`. See Zulip thread:
-- https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/116395-maths/topic/.E2.9C.94.20class_group.2Emk
/-- The affine coordinate ring `R[W] := R[X, Y] / ⟨W(X, Y)⟩` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev CoordinateRing : Type u :=
AdjoinRoot W.polynomial
/-- The function field `R(W) := Frac(R[W])` of a Weierstrass curve `W`. -/
abbrev FunctionField : Type u :=
FractionRing W.CoordinateRing
namespace CoordinateRing
section Algebra
/-! ### The coordinate ring as an `R[X]`-algebra -/
noncomputable instance : Algebra R W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R
noncomputable instance : Algebra R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.algebra R[X]
instance : IsScalarTower R R[X] W.CoordinateRing :=
Quotient.isScalarTower R R[X] _
instance [Subsingleton R] : Subsingleton W.CoordinateRing :=
Module.subsingleton R[X] _
/-- The natural ring homomorphism mapping `R[X][Y]` to `R[W]`. -/
noncomputable abbrev mk : R[X][Y] →+* W.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.mk W.polynomial
/-- The power basis `{1, Y}` for `R[W]` over `R[X]`. -/
protected noncomputable def basis : Basis (Fin 2) R[X] W.CoordinateRing := by
classical exact (subsingleton_or_nontrivial R).by_cases (fun _ => default) fun _ =>
(AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).basis.reindex <| finCongr W.natDegree_polynomial
lemma basis_apply (n : Fin 2) :
CoordinateRing.basis W n = (AdjoinRoot.powerBasis' W.monic_polynomial).gen ^ (n : ℕ) := by
classical
nontriviality R
rw [CoordinateRing.basis, Or.by_cases, dif_neg <| not_subsingleton R, Basis.reindex_apply,
PowerBasis.basis_eq_pow]
rfl
@[simp]
lemma basis_zero : CoordinateRing.basis W 0 = 1 := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_zero _
@[simp]
lemma basis_one : CoordinateRing.basis W 1 = mk W Y := by
simpa only [basis_apply] using pow_one _
lemma coe_basis : (CoordinateRing.basis W : Fin 2 → W.CoordinateRing) = ![1, mk W Y] := by
ext n
fin_cases n
exacts [basis_zero W, basis_one W]
variable {W} in
lemma smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) : x • y = mk W (C x) * y :=
(algebraMap_smul W.CoordinateRing x y).symm
variable {W} in
lemma smul_basis_eq_zero {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = 0) :
p = 0 ∧ q = 0 := by
have h := Fintype.linearIndependent_iff.mp (CoordinateRing.basis W).linearIndependent ![p, q]
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, basis_zero, Fin.sum_univ_one, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨h hpq 0, h hpq 1⟩
variable {W} in
lemma exists_smul_basis_eq (x : W.CoordinateRing) :
∃ p q : R[X], p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y = x := by
have h := (CoordinateRing.basis W).sum_equivFun x
rw [Fin.sum_univ_succ, Fin.sum_univ_one, basis_zero, Fin.succ_zero_eq_one, basis_one] at h
exact ⟨_, _, h⟩
lemma smul_basis_mul_C (y : R[X]) (p q : R[X]) :
(p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W (C y) =
(p * y) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + (q * y) • mk W Y := by
simp only [smul, map_mul]
ring1
lemma smul_basis_mul_Y (p q : R[X]) : (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) * mk W Y =
(q * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)) • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) +
(p - q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)) • mk W Y := by
have Y_sq : mk W Y ^ 2 =
mk W (C (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) * Y) := by
exact AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [polynomial]; ring1⟩
simp only [smul, add_mul, mul_assoc, ← sq, Y_sq, C_sub, map_sub, C_mul, map_mul]
ring1
/-- The ring homomorphism `R[W] →+* S[W.map f]` induced by a ring homomorphism `f : R →+* S`. -/
noncomputable def map : W.CoordinateRing →+* (W.map f).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.lift ((AdjoinRoot.of _).comp <| mapRingHom f)
((AdjoinRoot.root (WeierstrassCurve.map W f).toAffine.polynomial)) <| by
rw [← eval₂_map, ← map_polynomial, AdjoinRoot.eval₂_root]
lemma map_mk (x : R[X][Y]) : map W f (mk W x) = mk (W.map f) (x.map <| mapRingHom f) := by
rw [map, AdjoinRoot.lift_mk, ← eval₂_map]
exact AdjoinRoot.aeval_eq <| x.map <| mapRingHom f
variable {W} in
protected lemma map_smul (x : R[X]) (y : W.CoordinateRing) :
map W f (x • y) = x.map f • map W f y := by
rw [smul, map_mul, map_mk, map_C, smul]
rfl
variable {f} in
lemma map_injective (hf : Function.Injective f) : Function.Injective <| map W f :=
(injective_iff_map_eq_zero _).mpr fun y hy => by
obtain ⟨p, q, rfl⟩ := exists_smul_basis_eq y
simp_rw [map_add, CoordinateRing.map_smul, map_one, map_mk, map_X] at hy
obtain ⟨hp, hq⟩ := smul_basis_eq_zero hy
rw [Polynomial.map_eq_zero_iff hf] at hp hq
simp_rw [hp, hq, zero_smul, add_zero]
instance [IsDomain R] : IsDomain W.CoordinateRing :=
have : IsDomain (W.map <| algebraMap R <| FractionRing R).toAffine.CoordinateRing :=
AdjoinRoot.isDomain_of_prime irreducible_polynomial.prime
(map_injective W <| IsFractionRing.injective R <| FractionRing R).isDomain
end Algebra
section Ring
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a ring -/
/-- The class of the element `X - x` in `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XClass (x : R) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| C <| X - C x
lemma XClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (x : R) : XClass W x ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (C_ne_zero.mpr <| X_sub_C_ne_zero x) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_C]; norm_num1
/-- The class of the element `Y - y(X)` in `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YClass (y : R[X]) : W.CoordinateRing :=
mk W <| Y - C y
lemma YClass_ne_zero [Nontrivial R] (y : R[X]) : YClass W y ≠ 0 :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_ne_zero_of_natDegree_lt W.monic_polynomial (X_sub_C_ne_zero y) <|
by rw [natDegree_polynomial, natDegree_X_sub_C]; norm_num1
lemma C_addPolynomial (x y L : R) : mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x y L) =
mk W ((Y - C (linePolynomial x y L)) * (W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x y L))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, by rw [W.C_addPolynomial, add_sub_cancel_left, mul_one]⟩
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R`. -/
noncomputable def XIdeal (x : R) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x}
/-- The ideal `⟨Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def YIdeal (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {YClass W y}
/-- The ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` of `R[W]` for some `x` in `R` and `y(X)` in `R[X]`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal (x : R) (y : R[X]) : Ideal W.CoordinateRing :=
span {XClass W x, YClass W y}
lemma XYIdeal_eq₁ (x y L : R) : XYIdeal W x (C y) = XYIdeal W x (linePolynomial x y L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -L, ← map_mul, ← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_add_eq (x₁ x₂ y₁ L : R) : XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) (C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ L) =
span {mk W <| W.negPolynomial - C (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ L)} ⊔ XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ L) := by
simp only [XYIdeal, XIdeal, XClass, YClass, addY, negAddY, negY, negPolynomial, linePolynomial]
rw [sub_sub <| -(Y : R[X][Y]), neg_sub_left (Y : R[X][Y]), map_neg, span_singleton_neg, sup_comm,
← span_insert, ← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| W.a₁ + L, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
C_simp
ring1
/-- The `R`-algebra isomorphism from `R[W] / ⟨X - x, Y - y(X)⟩` to `R` obtained by evaluation at
some `y(X)` in `R[X]` and at some `x` in `R` provided that `W(x, y(x)) = 0`. -/
noncomputable def quotientXYIdealEquiv {x : R} {y : R[X]} (h : (W.polynomial.eval y).eval x = 0) :
(W.CoordinateRing ⧸ XYIdeal W x y) ≃ₐ[R] R :=
((quotientEquivAlgOfEq R <| by
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, ← Set.image_pair, ← map_span]; rfl).trans <|
DoubleQuot.quotQuotEquivQuotOfLEₐ R <| (span_singleton_le_iff_mem _).mpr <|
mem_span_C_X_sub_C_X_sub_C_iff_eval_eval_eq_zero.mpr h).trans
quotientSpanCXSubCXSubCAlgEquiv
end Ring
section Field
/-! ### Ideals in the coordinate ring over a field -/
variable {F : Type u} [Field F] {W : Affine F}
lemma C_addPolynomial_slope {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
mk W (C <| W.addPolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) =
-(XClass W x₁ * XClass W x₂ * XClass W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)) :=
congr_arg (mk W) <| W.C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy
lemma XYIdeal_eq₂ {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂) = XYIdeal W x₂ (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have hy₂ : y₂ = (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂).eval x₂ := by
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
field_simp [linePolynomial, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy]
· field_simp [linePolynomial, slope_of_X_ne hx, sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx]
ring1
nth_rw 1 [hy₂]
simp only [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, linePolynomial]
rw [← span_pair_add_mul_right <| mk W <| C <| C <| -W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, ← map_mul,
← map_add]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _ ∘ _ ∘ _)
eval_simp
C_simp
ring1
lemma XYIdeal_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) * XYIdeal W x (C y) = XIdeal W x := by
have Y_rw : (Y - C (C y)) * (Y - C (C <| W.negY x y)) -
C (X - C x) * (C (X ^ 2 + C (x + W.a₂) * X + C (x ^ 2 + W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)) - C (C W.a₁) * Y) =
W.polynomial * 1 := by
linear_combination (norm := (rw [negY, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1))
congr_arg C (congr_arg C ((equation_iff ..).mp h.left).symm)
simp_rw [XYIdeal, XClass, YClass, span_pair_mul_span_pair, mul_comm, ← map_mul,
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr ⟨1, Y_rw⟩, map_mul, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup, ← span_insert]
convert mul_top (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing) using 2
simp_rw [← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← Set.image_insert_eq, ← map_span]
convert map_top (R := F[X][Y]) (mk W) using 1
apply congr_arg
simp_rw [eq_top_iff_one, mem_span_insert', mem_span_singleton']
rcases ((nonsingular_iff' ..).mp h).right with hx | hy
· let W_X := W.a₁ * y - (3 * x ^ 2 + 2 * W.a₂ * x + W.a₄)
refine
⟨C <| C W_X⁻¹ * -(X + C (2 * x + W.a₂)), C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * W.a₁, 0, C <| C <| W_X⁻¹ * -1, ?_⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [W_X, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
· let W_Y := 2 * y + W.a₁ * x + W.a₃
refine ⟨0, C <| C W_Y⁻¹, C <| C <| W_Y⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩
rw [negY, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hy]
simp only [W_Y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy]
C_simp
ring1
private lemma XYIdeal'_mul_inv {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
XYIdeal W x (C y) * (XYIdeal W x (C <| W.negY x y) *
(XIdeal W x : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)⁻¹) = 1 := by
rw [← mul_assoc, ← FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul, mul_comm <| XYIdeal W .., XYIdeal_neg_mul h,
XIdeal, FractionalIdeal.coe_ideal_span_singleton_mul_inv W.FunctionField <| XClass_ne_zero W x]
lemma XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Equation x₁ y₁) (h₂ : W.Equation x₂ y₂)
(hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
XIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) * (XYIdeal W x₁ (C y₁) * XYIdeal W x₂ (C y₂)) =
YIdeal W (linePolynomial x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) *
XYIdeal W (W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂)
(C <| W.addY x₁ x₂ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂) := by
have sup_rw : ∀ a b c d : Ideal W.CoordinateRing, a ⊔ (b ⊔ (c ⊔ d)) = a ⊔ d ⊔ b ⊔ c :=
fun _ _ c _ => by rw [← sup_assoc, sup_comm c, sup_sup_sup_comm, ← sup_assoc]
rw [XYIdeal_add_eq, XIdeal, mul_comm, XYIdeal_eq₁ W x₁ y₁ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂, XYIdeal,
XYIdeal_eq₂ h₁ h₂ hxy, XYIdeal, span_pair_mul_span_pair]
simp_rw [span_insert, sup_rw, Ideal.sup_mul, span_singleton_mul_span_singleton]
rw [← neg_eq_iff_eq_neg.mpr <| C_addPolynomial_slope h₁ h₂ hxy, span_singleton_neg,
C_addPolynomial, map_mul, YClass]
simp_rw [mul_comm <| XClass W x₁, mul_assoc, ← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← Ideal.mul_sup]
rw [span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← span_insert,
← span_pair_add_mul_right <| -(XClass W <| W.addX x₁ x₂ <| W.slope x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂), mul_neg,
← sub_eq_add_neg, ← sub_mul, ← map_sub <| mk W, sub_sub_sub_cancel_right, span_insert,
← span_singleton_mul_span_singleton, ← sup_rw, ← Ideal.sup_mul, ← Ideal.sup_mul]
apply congr_arg (_ ∘ _)
convert top_mul (_ : Ideal W.CoordinateRing)
simp_rw [XClass, ← Set.image_singleton (f := mk W), ← map_span, ← Ideal.map_sup, eq_top_iff_one,
mem_map_iff_of_surjective _ AdjoinRoot.mk_surjective, ← span_insert, mem_span_insert',
mem_span_singleton']
by_cases hx : x₁ = x₂
· have hy : y₁ ≠ W.negY x₂ y₂ := fun h => hxy ⟨hx, h⟩
rcases hx, Y_eq_of_Y_ne h₁ h₂ hx hy with ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
let y := (y₁ - W.negY x₁ y₁) ^ 2
replace hxy := pow_ne_zero 2 <| sub_ne_zero_of_ne hy
refine ⟨1 + C (C <| y⁻¹ * 4) * W.polynomial,
⟨C <| C y⁻¹ * (C 4 * X ^ 2 + C (4 * x₁ + W.b₂) * X + C (4 * x₁ ^ 2 + W.b₂ * x₁ + 2 * W.b₄)),
0, C (C y⁻¹) * (Y - W.negPolynomial), ?_⟩, by
rw [map_add, map_one, map_mul <| mk W, AdjoinRoot.mk_self, mul_zero, add_zero]⟩
rw [polynomial, negPolynomial, ← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hxy]
simp only [y, mul_add, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hxy]
linear_combination (norm := (rw [b₂, b₄, negY]; C_simp; ring1))
-4 * congr_arg C (congr_arg C <| (equation_iff ..).mp h₁)
· replace hx := sub_ne_zero_of_ne hx
refine ⟨_, ⟨⟨C <| C (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹, C <| C <| (x₁ - x₂)⁻¹ * -1, 0, ?_⟩, map_one _⟩⟩
rw [← mul_right_inj' <| C_ne_zero.mpr <| C_ne_zero.mpr hx]
simp only [← mul_assoc, mul_add, ← C_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hx]
C_simp
ring1
/-- The non-zero fractional ideal `⟨X - x, Y - y⟩` of `F(W)` for some `x` and `y` in `F`. -/
noncomputable def XYIdeal' {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField)ˣ :=
Units.mkOfMulEqOne _ _ <| XYIdeal'_mul_inv h
lemma XYIdeal'_eq {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
(XYIdeal' h : FractionalIdeal W.CoordinateRing⁰ W.FunctionField) = XYIdeal W x (C y) :=
rfl
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul {x y : F} (h : W.Nonsingular x y) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| (nonsingular_neg ..).mpr h) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h) = 1 := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_one_of_coe_ideal <| (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm.trans <|
FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_inj.mpr <| XYIdeal_neg_mul h).mpr ⟨_, XClass_ne_zero W _, rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-01")] alias mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal'_of_Yeq :=
mk_XYIdeal'_neg_mul
lemma mk_XYIdeal'_mul_mk_XYIdeal' {x₁ x₂ y₁ y₂ : F} (h₁ : W.Nonsingular x₁ y₁)
(h₂ : W.Nonsingular x₂ y₂) (hxy : ¬(x₁ = x₂ ∧ y₁ = W.negY x₂ y₂)) :
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₁) * ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' h₂) =
ClassGroup.mk (XYIdeal' <| nonsingular_add h₁ h₂ hxy) := by
rw [← map_mul]
exact (ClassGroup.mk_eq_mk_of_coe_ideal (FractionalIdeal.coeIdeal_mul ..).symm <|
XYIdeal'_eq _).mpr
⟨_, _, XClass_ne_zero W _, YClass_ne_zero W _, XYIdeal_mul_XYIdeal h₁.left h₂.left hxy⟩
end Field
section Norm
/-! ### Norms on the coordinate ring -/
lemma norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
p ^ 2 - p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃) -
q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆) := by
simp_rw [Algebra.norm_eq_matrix_det <| CoordinateRing.basis W, Matrix.det_fin_two,
Algebra.leftMulMatrix_eq_repr_mul, basis_zero, mul_one, basis_one, smul_basis_mul_Y, map_add,
Finsupp.add_apply, map_smul, Finsupp.smul_apply, ← basis_zero, ← basis_one,
Basis.repr_self_apply, if_pos, one_ne_zero, if_false, smul_eq_mul]
ring1
lemma coe_norm_smul_basis (p q : R[X]) :
Algebra.norm R[X] (p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y) =
mk W ((C p + C q * X) * (C p + C q * (-(Y : R[X][Y]) - C (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)))) :=
AdjoinRoot.mk_eq_mk.mpr
⟨C q ^ 2, by simp only [norm_smul_basis, polynomial]; C_simp; ring1⟩
lemma degree_norm_smul_basis [IsDomain R] (p q : R[X]) :
(Algebra.norm R[X] <| p • (1 : W.CoordinateRing) + q • mk W Y).degree =
max (2 • p.degree) (2 • q.degree + 3) := by
have hdp : (p ^ 2).degree = 2 • p.degree := degree_pow p 2
have hdpq : (p * q * (C W.a₁ * X + C W.a₃)).degree ≤ p.degree + q.degree + 1 := by
simpa only [degree_mul] using add_le_add_left degree_linear_le (p.degree + q.degree)
have hdq :
(q ^ 2 * (X ^ 3 + C W.a₂ * X ^ 2 + C W.a₄ * X + C W.a₆)).degree = 2 • q.degree + 3 := by
rw [degree_mul, degree_pow, ← one_mul <| X ^ 3, ← C_1, degree_cubic <| one_ne_zero' R]
rw [norm_smul_basis]
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simpa only [hp, hdq, neg_zero, zero_sub, zero_mul, zero_pow two_ne_zero, degree_neg] using
(max_bot_left _).symm
· by_cases hq : q = 0
· simpa only [hq, hdp, sub_zero, zero_mul, mul_zero, zero_pow two_ne_zero] using
(max_bot_right _).symm
· rw [← not_congr degree_eq_bot] at hp hq
-- Porting note: BUG `cases` tactic does not modify assumptions in `hp'` and `hq'`
rcases hp' : p.degree with _ | dp -- `hp' : ` should be redundant
· exact (hp hp').elim -- `hp'` should be `rfl`
· rw [hp'] at hdp hdpq -- line should be redundant
rcases hq' : q.degree with _ | dq -- `hq' : ` should be redundant
· exact (hq hq').elim -- `hq'` should be `rfl`
· rw [hq'] at hdpq hdq -- line should be redundant
rcases le_or_lt dp (dq + 1) with hpq | hpq
| · convert (degree_sub_eq_right_of_degree_lt <| (degree_sub_le _ _).trans_lt <|
max_lt_iff.mpr ⟨hdp.trans_lt _, hdpq.trans_lt _⟩).trans
(max_eq_right_of_lt _).symm <;> rw [hdq] <;>
exact WithBot.coe_lt_coe.mpr <| by dsimp; linarith only [hpq]
· rw [sub_sub]
convert (degree_sub_eq_left_of_degree_lt <| (degree_add_le _ _).trans_lt <|
| Mathlib/AlgebraicGeometry/EllipticCurve/Group.lean | 453 | 458 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Bounds.Defs
import Mathlib.Order.Directed
import Mathlib.Order.BoundedOrder.Monotone
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.Basic
/-!
# Upper / lower bounds
In this file we prove various lemmas about upper/lower bounds of a set:
monotonicity, behaviour under `∪`, `∩`, `insert`,
and provide formulas for `∅`, `univ`, and intervals.
-/
open Function Set
open OrderDual (toDual ofDual)
universe u v
variable {α : Type u} {γ : Type v}
section
variable [Preorder α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem mem_upperBounds : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_lowerBounds : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, a ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
lemma mem_upperBounds_iff_subset_Iic : a ∈ upperBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Iic a := Iff.rfl
lemma mem_lowerBounds_iff_subset_Ici : a ∈ lowerBounds s ↔ s ⊆ Ici a := Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_def : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_def : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bot_mem_lowerBounds [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : ⊥ ∈ lowerBounds s := fun _ _ => bot_le
theorem top_mem_upperBounds [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : ⊤ ∈ upperBounds s := fun _ _ => le_top
@[simp]
theorem isLeast_bot_iff [OrderBot α] : IsLeast s ⊥ ↔ ⊥ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| bot_mem_lowerBounds _
@[simp]
theorem isGreatest_top_iff [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest s ⊤ ↔ ⊤ ∈ s :=
and_iff_left <| top_mem_upperBounds _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not greater than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(y ≤ x)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddAbove_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff' : ¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬y ≤ x := by
simp [BddAbove, upperBounds, Set.Nonempty]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` such that `x`
is not less than or equal to `y`. This version only assumes `Preorder` structure and uses
`¬(x ≤ y)`. A version for linear orders is called `not_bddBelow_iff`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff' : ¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, ¬x ≤ y :=
@not_bddAbove_iff' αᵒᵈ _ _
/-- A set `s` is not bounded above if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is greater
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddAbove_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddAbove_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddAbove s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, x < y := by
simp only [not_bddAbove_iff', not_le]
/-- A set `s` is not bounded below if and only if for each `x` there exists `y ∈ s` that is less
than `x`. A version for preorders is called `not_bddBelow_iff'`. -/
theorem not_bddBelow_iff {α : Type*} [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} :
¬BddBelow s ↔ ∀ x, ∃ y ∈ s, y < x :=
@not_bddAbove_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_ofDual {s : Set α} : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddBelow (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddAbove s := Iff.rfl
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_preimage_toDual {s : Set αᵒᵈ} :
BddAbove (toDual ⁻¹' s) ↔ BddBelow s := Iff.rfl
theorem BddAbove.dual (h : BddAbove s) : BddBelow (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem BddBelow.dual (h : BddBelow s) : BddAbove (ofDual ⁻¹' s) :=
h
theorem IsLeast.dual (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGreatest (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGreatest.dual (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLeast (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsLUB.dual (h : IsLUB s a) : IsGLB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
theorem IsGLB.dual (h : IsGLB s a) : IsLUB (ofDual ⁻¹' s) (toDual a) :=
h
/-- If `a` is the least element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with bottom element. -/
abbrev IsLeast.orderBot (h : IsLeast s a) :
OrderBot s where
bot := ⟨a, h.1⟩
bot_le := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of a set `s`, then subtype `s` is an order with top element. -/
abbrev IsGreatest.orderTop (h : IsGreatest s a) :
OrderTop s where
top := ⟨a, h.1⟩
le_top := Subtype.forall.2 h.2
theorem isLUB_congr (h : upperBounds s = upperBounds t) : IsLUB s a ↔ IsLUB t a := by
rw [IsLUB, IsLUB, h]
theorem isGLB_congr (h : lowerBounds s = lowerBounds t) : IsGLB s a ↔ IsGLB t a := by
rw [IsGLB, IsGLB, h]
/-!
### Monotonicity
-/
theorem upperBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem lowerBounds_mono_set ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) : lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds s :=
fun _ hb _ h => hb <| hst h
theorem upperBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : a ∈ upperBounds s → b ∈ upperBounds s :=
fun ha _ h => le_trans (ha h) hab
theorem lowerBounds_mono_mem ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) : b ∈ lowerBounds s → a ∈ lowerBounds s :=
fun hb _ h => le_trans hab (hb h)
theorem upperBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
a ∈ upperBounds t → b ∈ upperBounds s := fun ha =>
upperBounds_mono_set hst <| upperBounds_mono_mem hab ha
theorem lowerBounds_mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (hst : s ⊆ t) ⦃a b⦄ (hab : a ≤ b) :
b ∈ lowerBounds t → a ∈ lowerBounds s := fun hb =>
lowerBounds_mono_set hst <| lowerBounds_mono_mem hab hb
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded above, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddAbove.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddAbove t → BddAbove s :=
Nonempty.mono <| upperBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `s ⊆ t` and `t` is bounded below, then so is `s`. -/
theorem BddBelow.mono ⦃s t : Set α⦄ (h : s ⊆ t) : BddBelow t → BddBelow s :=
Nonempty.mono <| lowerBounds_mono_set h
/-- If `a` is a least upper bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a least upper bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsLUB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsLUB s a) (hp : IsLUB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsLUB t a :=
⟨upperBounds_mono_set htp hp.1, lowerBounds_mono_set (upperBounds_mono_set hst) hs.2⟩
/-- If `a` is a greatest lower bound for sets `s` and `p`, then it is a greater lower bound for any
set `t`, `s ⊆ t ⊆ p`. -/
theorem IsGLB.of_subset_of_superset {s t p : Set α} (hs : IsGLB s a) (hp : IsGLB p a) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(htp : t ⊆ p) : IsGLB t a :=
hs.dual.of_subset_of_superset hp hst htp
theorem IsLeast.mono (ha : IsLeast s a) (hb : IsLeast t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsGreatest.mono (ha : IsGreatest s a) (hb : IsGreatest t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
hb.2 (hst ha.1)
theorem IsLUB.mono (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : IsLUB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : a ≤ b :=
IsLeast.mono hb ha <| upperBounds_mono_set hst
theorem IsGLB.mono (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsGLB t b) (hst : s ⊆ t) : b ≤ a :=
IsGreatest.mono hb ha <| lowerBounds_mono_set hst
theorem subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ lowerBounds (upperBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds (s : Set α) : s ⊆ upperBounds (lowerBounds s) :=
fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddAbove_lowerBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddAbove (lowerBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s)
theorem Set.Nonempty.bddBelow_upperBounds (hs : s.Nonempty) : BddBelow (upperBounds s) :=
hs.mono (subset_lowerBounds_upperBounds s)
/-!
### Conversions
-/
theorem IsLeast.isGLB (h : IsLeast s a) : IsGLB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.isLUB (h : IsGreatest s a) : IsLUB s a :=
⟨h.2, fun _ hb => hb h.1⟩
theorem IsLUB.upperBounds_eq (h : IsLUB s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
Set.ext fun _ => ⟨fun hb => h.2 hb, fun hb => upperBounds_mono_mem hb h.1⟩
theorem IsGLB.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsGLB s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.dual.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsLeast.lowerBounds_eq (h : IsLeast s a) : lowerBounds s = Iic a :=
h.isGLB.lowerBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.upperBounds_eq (h : IsGreatest s a) : upperBounds s = Ici a :=
h.isLUB.upperBounds_eq
theorem IsGreatest.lt_iff (h : IsGreatest s a) : a < b ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x < b :=
⟨fun hlt _x hx => (h.2 hx).trans_lt hlt, fun h' => h' _ h.1⟩
theorem IsLeast.lt_iff (h : IsLeast s a) : b < a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, b < x :=
h.dual.lt_iff
theorem isLUB_le_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s := by
rw [h.upperBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem le_isGLB_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s := by
rw [h.lowerBounds_eq]
rfl
theorem isLUB_iff_le_iff : IsLUB s a ↔ ∀ b, a ≤ b ↔ b ∈ upperBounds s :=
⟨fun h _ => isLUB_le_iff h, fun H => ⟨(H _).1 le_rfl, fun b hb => (H b).2 hb⟩⟩
theorem isGLB_iff_le_iff : IsGLB s a ↔ ∀ b, b ≤ a ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
@isLUB_iff_le_iff αᵒᵈ _ _ _
/-- If `s` has a least upper bound, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsLUB.bddAbove (h : IsLUB s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest lower bound, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsGLB.bddBelow (h : IsGLB s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-- If `s` has a greatest element, then it is bounded above. -/
theorem IsGreatest.bddAbove (h : IsGreatest s a) : BddAbove s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
/-- If `s` has a least element, then it is bounded below. -/
theorem IsLeast.bddBelow (h : IsLeast s a) : BddBelow s :=
⟨a, h.2⟩
theorem IsLeast.nonempty (h : IsLeast s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
theorem IsGreatest.nonempty (h : IsGreatest s a) : s.Nonempty :=
⟨a, h.1⟩
/-!
### Union and intersection
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_union : upperBounds (s ∪ t) = upperBounds s ∩ upperBounds t :=
Subset.antisymm (fun _ hb => ⟨fun _ hx => hb (Or.inl hx), fun _ hx => hb (Or.inr hx)⟩)
fun _ hb _ hx => hx.elim (fun hs => hb.1 hs) fun ht => hb.2 ht
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_union : lowerBounds (s ∪ t) = lowerBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t :=
@upperBounds_union αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter :
upperBounds s ∪ upperBounds t ⊆ upperBounds (s ∩ t) :=
union_subset (upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_left)
(upperBounds_mono_set inter_subset_right)
theorem union_lowerBounds_subset_lowerBounds_inter :
lowerBounds s ∪ lowerBounds t ⊆ lowerBounds (s ∩ t) :=
@union_upperBounds_subset_upperBounds_inter αᵒᵈ _ s t
theorem isLeast_union_iff {a : α} {s t : Set α} :
IsLeast (s ∪ t) a ↔ IsLeast s a ∧ a ∈ lowerBounds t ∨ a ∈ lowerBounds s ∧ IsLeast t a := by
simp [IsLeast, lowerBounds_union, or_and_right, and_comm (a := a ∈ t), and_assoc]
theorem isGreatest_union_iff :
IsGreatest (s ∪ t) a ↔
IsGreatest s a ∧ a ∈ upperBounds t ∨ a ∈ upperBounds s ∧ IsGreatest t a :=
@isLeast_union_iff αᵒᵈ _ a s t
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_left (h : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddAbove.inter_of_right (h : BddAbove t) : BddAbove (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- If `s` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_left (h : BddBelow s) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_left
/-- If `t` is bounded, then so is `s ∩ t` -/
theorem BddBelow.inter_of_right (h : BddBelow t) : BddBelow (s ∩ t) :=
h.mono inter_subset_right
/-- In a directed order, the union of bounded above sets is bounded above. -/
theorem BddAbove.union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove s → BddAbove t → BddAbove (s ∪ t) := by
rintro ⟨a, ha⟩ ⟨b, hb⟩
obtain ⟨c, hca, hcb⟩ := exists_ge_ge a b
rw [BddAbove, upperBounds_union]
exact ⟨c, upperBounds_mono_mem hca ha, upperBounds_mono_mem hcb hb⟩
/-- In a directed order, the union of two sets is bounded above if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddAbove_union [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddAbove (s ∪ t) ↔ BddAbove s ∧ BddAbove t :=
⟨fun h => ⟨h.mono subset_union_left, h.mono subset_union_right⟩, fun h =>
h.1.union h.2⟩
/-- In a codirected order, the union of bounded below sets is bounded below. -/
theorem BddBelow.union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → BddBelow (s ∪ t) :=
@BddAbove.union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- In a codirected order, the union of two sets is bounded below if and only if both sets are. -/
theorem bddBelow_union [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s t : Set α} :
BddBelow (s ∪ t) ↔ BddBelow s ∧ BddBelow t :=
@bddAbove_union αᵒᵈ _ _ _ _
/-- If `a` is the least upper bound of `s` and `b` is the least upper bound of `t`,
then `a ⊔ b` is the least upper bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLUB.union [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s a) (ht : IsLUB t b) :
IsLUB (s ∪ t) (a ⊔ b) :=
⟨fun _ h =>
h.casesOn (fun h => le_sup_of_le_left <| hs.left h) fun h => le_sup_of_le_right <| ht.left h,
fun _ hc =>
sup_le (hs.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inl hd) (ht.right fun _ hd => hc <| Or.inr hd)⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest lower bound of `s` and `b` is the greatest lower bound of `t`,
then `a ⊓ b` is the greatest lower bound of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGLB.union [SemilatticeInf γ] {a₁ a₂ : γ} {s t : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s a₁)
(ht : IsGLB t a₂) : IsGLB (s ∪ t) (a₁ ⊓ a₂) :=
hs.dual.union ht
/-- If `a` is the least element of `s` and `b` is the least element of `t`,
then `min a b` is the least element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsLeast.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsLeast s a)
(hb : IsLeast t b) : IsLeast (s ∪ t) (min a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isGLB.union hb.isGLB).1⟩
/-- If `a` is the greatest element of `s` and `b` is the greatest element of `t`,
then `max a b` is the greatest element of `s ∪ t`. -/
theorem IsGreatest.union [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} {s t : Set γ} (ha : IsGreatest s a)
(hb : IsGreatest t b) : IsGreatest (s ∪ t) (max a b) :=
⟨by rcases le_total a b with h | h <;> simp [h, ha.1, hb.1], (ha.isLUB.union hb.isLUB).1⟩
theorem IsLUB.inter_Ici_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsLUB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsLUB (s ∩ Ici b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => ha.1 hx.1, fun c hc =>
have hbc : b ≤ c := hc ⟨hb, le_rfl⟩
ha.2 fun x hx => ((le_total x b).elim fun hxb => hxb.trans hbc) fun hbx => hc ⟨hx, hbx⟩⟩
theorem IsGLB.inter_Iic_of_mem [LinearOrder γ] {s : Set γ} {a b : γ} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : b ∈ s) :
IsGLB (s ∩ Iic b) a :=
ha.dual.inter_Ici_of_mem hb
theorem bddAbove_iff_exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddAbove s ↔ ∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x := by
rw [bddAbove_def, exists_ge_and_iff_exists]
exact Monotone.ball fun x _ => monotone_le
theorem bddBelow_iff_exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (x₀ : γ) :
BddBelow s ↔ ∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
bddAbove_iff_exists_ge (toDual x₀)
theorem BddAbove.exists_ge [SemilatticeSup γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddAbove s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x₀ ≤ x ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, y ≤ x :=
(bddAbove_iff_exists_ge x₀).mp hs
theorem BddBelow.exists_le [SemilatticeInf γ] {s : Set γ} (hs : BddBelow s) (x₀ : γ) :
∃ x, x ≤ x₀ ∧ ∀ y ∈ s, x ≤ y :=
(bddBelow_iff_exists_le x₀).mp hs
/-!
### Specific sets
#### Unbounded intervals
-/
theorem isLeast_Ici : IsLeast (Ici a) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ici, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isGreatest_Iic : IsGreatest (Iic a) a :=
⟨right_mem_Iic, fun _ => id⟩
theorem isLUB_Iic : IsLUB (Iic a) a :=
isGreatest_Iic.isLUB
theorem isGLB_Ici : IsGLB (Ici a) a :=
isLeast_Ici.isGLB
theorem upperBounds_Iic : upperBounds (Iic a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iic.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ici : lowerBounds (Ici a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ici.lowerBounds_eq
theorem bddAbove_Iic : BddAbove (Iic a) :=
isLUB_Iic.bddAbove
theorem bddBelow_Ici : BddBelow (Ici a) :=
isGLB_Ici.bddBelow
theorem bddAbove_Iio : BddAbove (Iio a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem bddBelow_Ioi : BddBelow (Ioi a) :=
⟨a, fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx⟩
theorem lub_Iio_le (a : α) (hb : IsLUB (Iio a) b) : b ≤ a :=
(isLUB_le_iff hb).mpr fun _ hk => le_of_lt hk
theorem le_glb_Ioi (a : α) (hb : IsGLB (Ioi a) b) : a ≤ b :=
@lub_Iio_le αᵒᵈ _ _ a hb
theorem lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsLUB (Iio i) j) :
j = i ∨ Iio i = Iic j := by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (lub_Iio_le i hj) with hj_eq_i | hj_lt_i
· exact Or.inl hj_eq_i
· right
exact Set.ext fun k => ⟨fun hk_lt => hj.1 hk_lt, fun hk_le_j => lt_of_le_of_lt hk_le_j hj_lt_i⟩
theorem glb_Ioi_eq_self_or_Ioi_eq_Ici [PartialOrder γ] {j : γ} (i : γ) (hj : IsGLB (Ioi i) j) :
j = i ∨ Ioi i = Ici j :=
@lub_Iio_eq_self_or_Iio_eq_Iic γᵒᵈ _ j i hj
section
variable [LinearOrder γ]
theorem exists_lub_Iio (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsLUB (Iio i) j := by
by_cases h_exists_lt : ∃ j, j ∈ upperBounds (Iio i) ∧ j < i
· obtain ⟨j, hj_ub, hj_lt_i⟩ := h_exists_lt
exact ⟨j, hj_ub, fun k hk_ub => hk_ub hj_lt_i⟩
· refine ⟨i, fun j hj => le_of_lt hj, ?_⟩
rw [mem_lowerBounds]
by_contra h
refine h_exists_lt ?_
push_neg at h
exact h
theorem exists_glb_Ioi (i : γ) : ∃ j, IsGLB (Ioi i) j :=
@exists_lub_Iio γᵒᵈ _ i
variable [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Iio {a : γ} : IsLUB (Iio a) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => le_of_lt hx, fun _ hy => le_of_forall_lt_imp_le_of_dense hy⟩
theorem isGLB_Ioi {a : γ} : IsGLB (Ioi a) a :=
@isLUB_Iio γᵒᵈ _ _ a
theorem upperBounds_Iio {a : γ} : upperBounds (Iio a) = Ici a :=
isLUB_Iio.upperBounds_eq
theorem lowerBounds_Ioi {a : γ} : lowerBounds (Ioi a) = Iic a :=
isGLB_Ioi.lowerBounds_eq
end
/-!
#### Singleton
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_singleton : IsGreatest {a} a :=
⟨mem_singleton a, fun _ hx => le_of_eq <| eq_of_mem_singleton hx⟩
@[simp] theorem isLeast_singleton : IsLeast {a} a :=
@isGreatest_singleton αᵒᵈ _ a
@[simp] theorem isLUB_singleton : IsLUB {a} a :=
isGreatest_singleton.isLUB
@[simp] theorem isGLB_singleton : IsGLB {a} a :=
isLeast_singleton.isGLB
@[simp] lemma bddAbove_singleton : BddAbove ({a} : Set α) := isLUB_singleton.bddAbove
@[simp] lemma bddBelow_singleton : BddBelow ({a} : Set α) := isGLB_singleton.bddBelow
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_singleton : upperBounds {a} = Ici a :=
isLUB_singleton.upperBounds_eq
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_singleton : lowerBounds {a} = Iic a :=
isGLB_singleton.lowerBounds_eq
/-!
#### Bounded intervals
-/
theorem bddAbove_Icc : BddAbove (Icc a b) :=
⟨b, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem bddBelow_Icc : BddBelow (Icc a b) :=
⟨a, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem bddAbove_Ico : BddAbove (Ico a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ico : BddBelow (Ico a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ico_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioc : BddAbove (Ioc a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioc : BddBelow (Ioc a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddAbove_Ioo : BddAbove (Ioo a b) :=
bddAbove_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem bddBelow_Ioo : BddBelow (Ioo a b) :=
bddBelow_Icc.mono Ioo_subset_Icc_self
theorem isGreatest_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGreatest (Icc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLUB (Icc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Icc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : upperBounds (Icc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsLeast (Icc a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Icc.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : IsGLB (Icc a b) a :=
(isLeast_Icc h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : lowerBounds (Icc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGreatest_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsGreatest (Ioc a b) b :=
⟨right_mem_Ioc.2 h, fun _ => And.right⟩
theorem isLUB_Ioc (h : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioc a b) b :=
(isGreatest_Ioc h).isLUB
theorem upperBounds_Ioc (h : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioc a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLeast_Ico (h : a < b) : IsLeast (Ico a b) a :=
⟨left_mem_Ico.2 h, fun _ => And.left⟩
theorem isGLB_Ico (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ico a b) a :=
(isLeast_Ico h).isGLB
theorem lowerBounds_Ico (h : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ico a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).lowerBounds_eq
section
variable [SemilatticeSup γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isGLB_Ioo {a b : γ} (h : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioo a b) a :=
⟨fun _ hx => hx.1.le, fun x hx => by
rcases eq_or_lt_of_le (le_sup_right : a ≤ x ⊔ a) with h₁ | h₂
· exact h₁.symm ▸ le_sup_left
obtain ⟨y, lty, ylt⟩ := exists_between h₂
apply (not_lt_of_le (sup_le (hx ⟨lty, ylt.trans_le (sup_le _ h.le)⟩) lty.le) ylt).elim
obtain ⟨u, au, ub⟩ := exists_between h
apply (hx ⟨au, ub⟩).trans ub.le⟩
theorem lowerBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioo a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).lowerBounds_eq
theorem isGLB_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsGLB (Ioc a b) a :=
(isGLB_Ioo hab).of_subset_of_superset (isGLB_Icc hab.le) Ioo_subset_Ioc_self Ioc_subset_Icc_self
theorem lowerBounds_Ioc {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : lowerBounds (Ioc a b) = Iic a :=
(isGLB_Ioc hab).lowerBounds_eq
end
section
variable [SemilatticeInf γ] [DenselyOrdered γ]
theorem isLUB_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ioo a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioo_toDual] using isGLB_Ioo hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ioo {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ioo a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ioo hab).upperBounds_eq
theorem isLUB_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : IsLUB (Ico a b) b := by
simpa only [Ioc_toDual] using isGLB_Ioc hab.dual
theorem upperBounds_Ico {a b : γ} (hab : a < b) : upperBounds (Ico a b) = Ici b :=
(isLUB_Ico hab).upperBounds_eq
end
theorem bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici : BddBelow s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Ici a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic : BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a, s ⊆ Iic a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem bddBelow_bddAbove_iff_subset_Icc : BddBelow s ∧ BddAbove s ↔ ∃ a b, s ⊆ Icc a b := by
simp [Ici_inter_Iic.symm, subset_inter_iff, bddBelow_iff_subset_Ici,
bddAbove_iff_subset_Iic, exists_and_left, exists_and_right]
/-!
#### Univ
-/
@[simp] theorem isGreatest_univ_iff : IsGreatest univ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds, IsTop]
theorem isGreatest_univ [OrderTop α] : IsGreatest (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ_iff.2 isTop_top
@[simp]
theorem OrderTop.upperBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderTop γ] :
upperBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊤} := by rw [isGreatest_univ.upperBounds_eq, Ici_top]
theorem isLUB_univ [OrderTop α] : IsLUB (univ : Set α) ⊤ :=
isGreatest_univ.isLUB
@[simp]
theorem OrderBot.lowerBounds_univ [PartialOrder γ] [OrderBot γ] :
lowerBounds (univ : Set γ) = {⊥} :=
@OrderTop.upperBounds_univ γᵒᵈ _ _
@[simp] theorem isLeast_univ_iff : IsLeast univ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGreatest_univ_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isLeast_univ [OrderBot α] : IsLeast (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
@isGreatest_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_univ [OrderBot α] : IsGLB (univ : Set α) ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.isGLB
@[simp]
theorem NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ [NoTopOrder α] : upperBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
eq_empty_of_subset_empty fun b hb =>
not_isTop b fun x => hb (mem_univ x)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMaxOrder.upperBounds_univ := NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ [NoBotOrder α] : lowerBounds (univ : Set α) = ∅ :=
@NoTopOrder.upperBounds_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-18")]
alias NoMinOrder.lowerBounds_univ := NoBotOrder.lowerBounds_univ
@[simp]
theorem not_bddAbove_univ [NoTopOrder α] : ¬BddAbove (univ : Set α) := by simp [BddAbove]
@[simp]
theorem not_bddBelow_univ [NoBotOrder α] : ¬BddBelow (univ : Set α) :=
@not_bddAbove_univ αᵒᵈ _ _
/-!
#### Empty set
-/
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_empty : upperBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ := by
simp only [upperBounds, eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_setOf_eq, forall_mem_empty, forall_true_iff]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_empty : lowerBounds (∅ : Set α) = univ :=
@upperBounds_empty αᵒᵈ _
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_empty [Nonempty α] : BddAbove (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddAbove, upperBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_empty [Nonempty α] : BddBelow (∅ : Set α) := by
simp only [BddBelow, lowerBounds_empty, univ_nonempty]
@[simp] theorem isGLB_empty_iff : IsGLB ∅ a ↔ IsTop a := by
simp [IsGLB]
@[simp] theorem isLUB_empty_iff : IsLUB ∅ a ↔ IsBot a :=
@isGLB_empty_iff αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem isGLB_empty [OrderTop α] : IsGLB ∅ (⊤ : α) :=
isGLB_empty_iff.2 isTop_top
theorem isLUB_empty [OrderBot α] : IsLUB ∅ (⊥ : α) :=
@isGLB_empty αᵒᵈ _ _
theorem IsLUB.nonempty [NoBotOrder α] (hs : IsLUB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
nonempty_iff_ne_empty.2 fun h =>
not_isBot a fun _ => hs.right <| by rw [h, upperBounds_empty]; exact mem_univ _
theorem IsGLB.nonempty [NoTopOrder α] (hs : IsGLB s a) : s.Nonempty :=
hs.dual.nonempty
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddAbove [ha : Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddAbove s) : s.Nonempty :=
(Nonempty.elim ha) fun x => (not_bddAbove_iff'.1 h x).imp fun _ ha => ha.1
theorem nonempty_of_not_bddBelow [Nonempty α] (h : ¬BddBelow s) : s.Nonempty :=
@nonempty_of_not_bddAbove αᵒᵈ _ _ _ h
/-!
#### insert
-/
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness above. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddAbove_insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddAbove (insert a s) ↔ BddAbove s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddAbove_union, bddAbove_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddAbove.insert [IsDirected α (· ≤ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddAbove s → BddAbove (insert a s) :=
bddAbove_insert.2
/-- Adding a point to a set preserves its boundedness below. -/
@[simp]
theorem bddBelow_insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} {a : α} :
BddBelow (insert a s) ↔ BddBelow s := by
simp only [insert_eq, bddBelow_union, bddBelow_singleton, true_and]
protected theorem BddBelow.insert [IsDirected α (· ≥ ·)] {s : Set α} (a : α) :
BddBelow s → BddBelow (insert a s) :=
bddBelow_insert.2
protected theorem IsLUB.insert [SemilatticeSup γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLUB s b) :
IsLUB (insert a s) (a ⊔ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLUB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGLB.insert [SemilatticeInf γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGLB s b) :
IsGLB (insert a s) (a ⊓ b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGLB_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsGreatest.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsGreatest s b) :
IsGreatest (insert a s) (max a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isGreatest_singleton.union hs
protected theorem IsLeast.insert [LinearOrder γ] (a) {b} {s : Set γ} (hs : IsLeast s b) :
IsLeast (insert a s) (min a b) := by
rw [insert_eq]
exact isLeast_singleton.union hs
@[simp]
theorem upperBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
upperBounds (insert a s) = Ici a ∩ upperBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, upperBounds_union, upperBounds_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem lowerBounds_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) :
lowerBounds (insert a s) = Iic a ∩ lowerBounds s := by
rw [insert_eq, lowerBounds_union, lowerBounds_singleton]
/-- When there is a global maximum, every set is bounded above. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderTop.bddAbove [OrderTop α] (s : Set α) : BddAbove s :=
⟨⊤, fun a _ => OrderTop.le_top a⟩
/-- When there is a global minimum, every set is bounded below. -/
@[simp]
protected theorem OrderBot.bddBelow [OrderBot α] (s : Set α) : BddBelow s :=
⟨⊥, fun a _ => OrderBot.bot_le a⟩
/-- Sets are automatically bounded or cobounded in complete lattices. To use the same statements
in complete and conditionally complete lattices but let automation fill automatically the
boundedness proofs in complete lattices, we use the tactic `bddDefault` in the statements,
in the form `(hA : BddAbove A := by bddDefault)`. -/
macro "bddDefault" : tactic =>
`(tactic| first
| apply OrderTop.bddAbove
| apply OrderBot.bddBelow)
/-!
#### Pair
-/
theorem isLUB_pair [SemilatticeSup γ] {a b : γ} : IsLUB {a, b} (a ⊔ b) :=
isLUB_singleton.insert _
theorem isGLB_pair [SemilatticeInf γ] {a b : γ} : IsGLB {a, b} (a ⊓ b) :=
isGLB_singleton.insert _
theorem isLeast_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsLeast {a, b} (min a b) :=
isLeast_singleton.insert _
theorem isGreatest_pair [LinearOrder γ] {a b : γ} : IsGreatest {a, b} (max a b) :=
isGreatest_singleton.insert _
/-!
#### Lower/upper bounds
-/
@[simp]
theorem isLUB_lowerBounds : IsLUB (lowerBounds s) a ↔ IsGLB s a :=
⟨fun H => ⟨fun _ hx => H.2 <| subset_upperBounds_lowerBounds s hx, H.1⟩, IsGreatest.isLUB⟩
@[simp]
theorem isGLB_upperBounds : IsGLB (upperBounds s) a ↔ IsLUB s a :=
@isLUB_lowerBounds αᵒᵈ _ _ _
end
/-!
### (In)equalities with the least upper bound and the greatest lower bound
-/
section Preorder
variable [Preorder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lowerBounds_le_upperBounds (ha : a ∈ lowerBounds s) (hb : b ∈ upperBounds s) :
s.Nonempty → a ≤ b
| ⟨_, hc⟩ => le_trans (ha hc) (hb hc)
theorem isGLB_le_isLUB (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ b :=
lowerBounds_le_upperBounds ha.1 hb.1 hs
theorem isLUB_lt_iff (ha : IsLUB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ upperBounds s, c < b :=
⟨fun hb => ⟨a, ha.1, hb⟩, fun ⟨_, hcs, hcb⟩ => lt_of_le_of_lt (ha.2 hcs) hcb⟩
theorem lt_isGLB_iff (ha : IsGLB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ lowerBounds s, b < c :=
isLUB_lt_iff ha.dual
theorem le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB {x y} (ha : IsGLB s a) (hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) (hx : x ∈ s)
(hy : y ∈ s) : x ≤ y :=
calc
x ≤ b := hb.1 hx
_ ≤ a := hab
_ ≤ y := ha.1 hy
end Preorder
section PartialOrder
variable [PartialOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem IsLeast.unique (Ha : IsLeast s a) (Hb : IsLeast s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Ha.right Hb.left) (Hb.right Ha.left)
theorem IsLeast.isLeast_iff_eq (Ha : IsLeast s a) : IsLeast s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsGreatest.unique (Ha : IsGreatest s a) (Hb : IsGreatest s b) : a = b :=
le_antisymm (Hb.right Ha.left) (Ha.right Hb.left)
theorem IsGreatest.isGreatest_iff_eq (Ha : IsGreatest s a) : IsGreatest s b ↔ a = b :=
Iff.intro Ha.unique fun h => h ▸ Ha
theorem IsLUB.unique (Ha : IsLUB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) : a = b :=
IsLeast.unique Ha Hb
theorem IsGLB.unique (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsGLB s b) : a = b :=
IsGreatest.unique Ha Hb
theorem Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) (hab : b ≤ a) :
s.Subsingleton := fun _ hx _ hy =>
le_antisymm (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hx hy) (le_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab hy hx)
theorem isGLB_lt_isLUB_of_ne (Ha : IsGLB s a) (Hb : IsLUB s b) {x y} (Hx : x ∈ s) (Hy : y ∈ s)
(Hxy : x ≠ y) : a < b :=
lt_iff_le_not_le.2
⟨lowerBounds_le_upperBounds Ha.1 Hb.1 ⟨x, Hx⟩, fun hab =>
Hxy <| Set.subsingleton_of_isLUB_le_isGLB Ha Hb hab Hx Hy⟩
end PartialOrder
section LinearOrder
variable [LinearOrder α] {s : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem lt_isLUB_iff (h : IsLUB s a) : b < a ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, b < c := by
simp_rw [← not_le, isLUB_le_iff h, mem_upperBounds, not_forall, not_le, exists_prop]
theorem isGLB_lt_iff (h : IsGLB s a) : a < b ↔ ∃ c ∈ s, c < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff h.dual
theorem IsLUB.exists_between (h : IsLUB s a) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c ≤ a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (lt_isLUB_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, h.1 hcs⟩
theorem IsLUB.exists_between' (h : IsLUB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : b < a) : ∃ c ∈ s, b < c ∧ c < a :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hbc, hca.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac ▸ hcs⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between (h : IsGLB s a) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a ≤ c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hbc⟩ := (isGLB_lt_iff h).1 hb
⟨c, hcs, h.1 hcs, hbc⟩
theorem IsGLB.exists_between' (h : IsGLB s a) (h' : a ∉ s) (hb : a < b) : ∃ c ∈ s, a < c ∧ c < b :=
let ⟨c, hcs, hac, hcb⟩ := h.exists_between hb
⟨c, hcs, hac.lt_of_ne fun hac => h' <| hac.symm ▸ hcs, hcb⟩
end LinearOrder
theorem isGreatest_himp [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsGreatest {w | w ⊓ a ≤ b} (a ⇨ b) := by
simp [IsGreatest, mem_upperBounds]
theorem isLeast_sdiff [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] (a b : α) :
IsLeast {w | a ≤ b ⊔ w} (a \ b) := by
simp [IsLeast, mem_lowerBounds]
theorem isGreatest_compl [HeytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsGreatest {w | Disjoint w a} (aᶜ) := by
simpa only [himp_bot, disjoint_iff_inf_le] using isGreatest_himp a ⊥
theorem isLeast_hnot [CoheytingAlgebra α] (a : α) :
IsLeast {w | Codisjoint a w} (￢a) := by
simpa only [CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup] using isLeast_sdiff ⊤ a
| Mathlib/Order/Bounds/Basic.lean | 1,191 | 1,194 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ContDiff.Basic
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.ParametricIntegral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.LocallyIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Integral
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Group.Prod
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
/-!
# Convolution of functions
This file defines the convolution on two functions, i.e. `x ↦ ∫ f(t)g(x - t) ∂t`.
In the general case, these functions can be vector-valued, and have an arbitrary (additive)
group as domain. We use a continuous bilinear operation `L` on these function values as
"multiplication". The domain must be equipped with a Haar measure `μ`
(though many individual results have weaker conditions on `μ`).
For many applications we can take `L = ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ` or
`L = ContinuousLinearMap.mul ℝ ℝ`.
We also define `ConvolutionExists` and `ConvolutionExistsAt` to state that the convolution is
well-defined (everywhere or at a single point). These conditions are needed for pointwise
computations (e.g. `ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add`), but are generally not strong enough for any
local (or global) properties of the convolution. For this we need stronger assumptions on `f`
and/or `g`, and generally if we impose stronger conditions on one of the functions, we can impose
weaker conditions on the other.
We have proven many of the properties of the convolution assuming one of these functions
has compact support (in which case the other function only needs to be locally integrable).
We still need to prove the properties for other pairs of conditions (e.g. both functions are
rapidly decreasing)
# Design Decisions
We use a bilinear map `L` to "multiply" the two functions in the integrand.
This generality has several advantages
* This allows us to compute the total derivative of the convolution, in case the functions are
multivariate. The total derivative is again a convolution, but where the codomains of the
functions can be higher-dimensional. See `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right`.
* This allows us to use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (which would not be possible if we would use
`mul`/`smul` in the integral, since `@[to_additive]` will incorrectly also try to additivize
those definitions).
* We need to support the case where at least one of the functions is vector-valued, but if we use
`smul` to multiply the functions, that would be an asymmetric definition.
# Main Definitions
* `MeasureTheory.convolution f g L μ x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`
is the convolution of `f` and `g` w.r.t. the continuous bilinear map `L` and measure `μ`.
* `MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ` states that the convolution `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`
is well-defined (i.e. the integral exists).
* `MeasureTheory.ConvolutionExists f g L μ` states that the convolution `f ⋆[L, μ] g`
is well-defined at each point.
# Main Results
* `HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.hasFDerivAt_convolution_left`: we can compute the total derivative
of the convolution as a convolution with the total derivative of the right (left) function.
* `HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_right` and
`HasCompactSupport.contDiff_convolution_left`: the convolution is `𝒞ⁿ` if one of the functions
is `𝒞ⁿ` with compact support and the other function in locally integrable.
Versions of these statements for functions depending on a parameter are also given.
* `MeasureTheory.convolution_tendsto_right`: Given a sequence of nonnegative normalized functions
whose support tends to a small neighborhood around `0`, the convolution tends to the right
argument. This is specialized to bump functions in `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
# Notation
The following notations are localized in the locale `Convolution`:
* `f ⋆[L, μ] g` for the convolution. Note: you have to use parentheses to apply the convolution
to an argument: `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x`.
* `f ⋆[L] g := f ⋆[L, volume] g`
* `f ⋆ g := f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ] g`
# To do
* Existence and (uniform) continuity of the convolution if
one of the maps is in `ℒ^p` and the other in `ℒ^q` with `1 / p + 1 / q = 1`.
This might require a generalization of `MeasureTheory.MemLp.smul` where `smul` is generalized
to a continuous bilinear map.
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255K)
* The convolution is an `AEStronglyMeasurable` function
(see e.g. [Fremlin, *Measure Theory* (volume 2)][fremlin_vol2], 255I).
* Prove properties about the convolution if both functions are rapidly decreasing.
* Use `@[to_additive]` everywhere (this likely requires changes in `to_additive`)
-/
open Set Function Filter MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure TopologicalSpace
open Bornology ContinuousLinearMap Metric Topology
open scoped Pointwise NNReal Filter
universe u𝕜 uG uE uE' uE'' uF uF' uF'' uP
variable {𝕜 : Type u𝕜} {G : Type uG} {E : Type uE} {E' : Type uE'} {E'' : Type uE''} {F : Type uF}
{F' : Type uF'} {F'' : Type uF''} {P : Type uP}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedAddCommGroup E'] [NormedAddCommGroup E'']
[NormedAddCommGroup F] {f f' : G → E} {g g' : G → E'} {x x' : G} {y y' : E}
namespace MeasureTheory
section NontriviallyNormedField
variable [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section NoMeasurability
variable [AddGroup G] [TopologicalSpace G]
theorem convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset {C : ℝ} (hC : ∀ i, ‖g i‖ ≤ C) {x t : G}
{s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * C) t := by
-- Porting note: had to add `f := _`
refine le_indicator (f := fun t ↦ ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖) (fun t _ => ?_) (fun t ht => ?_) t
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
· have : x - t ∉ support g := by
refine mt (fun hxt => hu ?_) ht
refine ⟨_, Set.neg_mem_neg.mpr (subset_closure hxt), _, hx, ?_⟩
simp only [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
simp only [nmem_support.mp this, (L _).map_zero, norm_zero, le_rfl]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hg : Continuous g)
{x t : G} {s u : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) (hu : -tsupport g + s ⊆ u) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ u.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t := by
refine convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_le_of_subset _ (fun i => ?_) hx hu
exact le_ciSup (hg.norm.bddAbove_range_of_hasCompactSupport hcg.norm) _
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hg : Continuous g) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ (-tsupport g + s).indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖) t :=
hcg.convolution_integrand_bound_right_of_subset L hg hx Subset.rfl
theorem _root_.Continuous.convolution_integrand_fst [ContinuousSub G] (hg : Continuous g) (t : G) :
Continuous fun x => L (f t) (g (x - t)) :=
L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <| hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution_integrand_bound_left (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hf : Continuous f) {x t : G} {s : Set G} (hx : x ∈ s) :
‖L (f (x - t)) (g t)‖ ≤
(-tsupport f + s).indicator (fun t => (‖L‖ * ⨆ i, ‖f i‖) * ‖g t‖) t := by
convert hcf.convolution_integrand_bound_right L.flip hf hx using 1
simp_rw [L.opNorm_flip, mul_right_comm]
end NoMeasurability
section Measurability
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists at `x` when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is
integrable. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExistsAt [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (x : G) (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ
/-- The convolution of `f` and `g` exists when the function `t ↦ L (f t) (g (x - t))` is integrable
for all `x : G`. There are various conditions on `f` and `g` to prove this. -/
def ConvolutionExists [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : Prop :=
∀ x : G, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ
section ConvolutionExists
variable {L} in
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable [Sub G] {x : G} (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
h
section Group
variable [AddGroup G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand' [MeasurableAdd₂ G]
[MeasurableNeg G] (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun p : G × G => p.1 - p.2) (μ.prod ν)) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd <| hg.comp_measurable measurable_sub
section
variable [MeasurableAdd G] [MeasurableNeg G]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd'
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) {x : G}
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf <| hg.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd' {x : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f <| map (fun t => x - t) μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
L.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ (hf.comp_measurable <| measurable_id.const_sub x) hg
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that `f` is integrable on a set `s` and `g` is bounded and ae strongly measurable
on `x₀ - s` (note that both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) (μ.restrict s)) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
rw [ConvolutionExistsAt]
rw [← integrableOn_iff_integrable_of_support_subset h2s]
set s' := (fun t => -t + x₀) ⁻¹' s
have : ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ.restrict s,
‖L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))‖ ≤ s.indicator (fun t => ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i : s', ‖g i‖) t := by
filter_upwards
refine le_indicator (fun t ht => ?_) fun t ht => ?_
· apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl]
refine (le_ciSup_set hbg <| mem_preimage.mpr ?_)
rwa [neg_sub, sub_add_cancel]
· have : t ∉ support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) := mt (fun h => h2s h) ht
rw [nmem_support.mp this, norm_zero]
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ ?_ this
· rw [integrable_indicator_iff hs]; exact ((hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _).integrableOn
· exact hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm' {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g <| map (fun t => x₀ - t) μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine (h.const_mul ‖L‖).mono'
(hmf.convolution_integrand_snd' L hmg) (Eventually.of_forall fun x => ?_)
rw [mul_apply', ← mul_assoc]
apply L.le_opNorm₂
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm' := ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm'
end
section Left
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) μ :=
hf.convolution_integrand_snd' L <|
hg.mono_ac <| (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).absolutelyContinuous
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_swap_snd
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (x : G) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
(hf.mono_ac
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ
x).absolutelyContinuous).convolution_integrand_swap_snd'
L hg
/-- If `‖f‖ *[μ] ‖g‖` exists, then `f *[L, μ] g` exists. -/
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm {x₀ : G}
(h : ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) (fun x => ‖g x‖) x₀ (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hmf : AEStronglyMeasurable f μ) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ :=
h.of_norm' L hmf <|
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias ConvolutionExistsAt.ofNorm := ConvolutionExistsAt.of_norm
end Left
section Right
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ] [SFinite ν]
theorem AEStronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand (hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν)
(hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.convolution_integrand' L <|
hg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_of_right_invariant μ ν).absolutelyContinuous
theorem Integrable.convolution_integrand (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Integrable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) := by
have h_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun p : G × G => L (f p.2) (g (p.1 - p.2))) (μ.prod ν) :=
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
have h2_meas : AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y : G => ∫ x : G, ‖L (f y) (g (x - y))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
simp_rw [integrable_prod_iff' h_meas]
refine ⟨Eventually.of_forall fun t => (L (f t)).integrable_comp (hg.comp_sub_right t), ?_⟩
refine Integrable.mono' ?_ h2_meas
(Eventually.of_forall fun t => (?_ : _ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ∫ x, ‖g (x - t)‖ ∂μ))
· simp only [integral_sub_right_eq_self (‖g ·‖)]
exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· simp_rw [← integral_const_mul]
rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (by positivity)]
exact integral_mono_of_nonneg (Eventually.of_forall fun t => norm_nonneg _)
((hg.comp_sub_right t).norm.const_mul _) (Eventually.of_forall fun t => L.le_opNorm₂ _ _)
theorem Integrable.ae_convolution_exists (hf : Integrable f ν) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L ν :=
((integrable_prod_iff <|
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand L hg.aestronglyMeasurable).mp <|
hf.convolution_integrand L hg).1
end Right
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt {x₀ : G}
(h : HasCompactSupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
let u := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addRight x₀)
let v := (Homeomorph.neg G).trans (Homeomorph.addLeft x₀)
apply ((u.isCompact_preimage.mpr h).bddAbove_image hg.norm.continuousOn).convolutionExistsAt' L
isClosed_closure.measurableSet subset_closure (hf.integrableOn_isCompact h)
have A : AEStronglyMeasurable (g ∘ v)
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t : G => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)))) := by
apply (hg.comp v.continuous).continuousOn.aestronglyMeasurable_of_isCompact h
exact (isClosed_tsupport _).measurableSet
convert ((v.continuous.measurable.measurePreserving
(μ.restrict (tsupport fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))))).aestronglyMeasurable_comp_iff
v.measurableEmbedding).1 A
ext x
simp only [v, Homeomorph.neg, sub_eq_add_neg, val_toAddUnits_apply, Homeomorph.trans_apply,
Equiv.neg_apply, Equiv.toFun_as_coe, Homeomorph.homeomorph_mk_coe, Equiv.coe_fn_mk,
Homeomorph.coe_addLeft]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine (hcg.comp_homeomorph (Homeomorph.subLeft x₀)).mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : g (x₀ - t) = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, (L _).map_zero]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := by
intro x₀
refine HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ hf hg
refine hcf.mono ?_
refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
section MeasurableGroup
variable [MeasurableNeg G] [IsAddLeftInvariant μ]
/-- A sufficient condition to prove that `f ⋆[L, μ] g` exists.
We assume that the integrand has compact support and `g` is bounded on this support (note that
both properties hold if `g` is continuous with compact support). We also require that `f` is
integrable on the support of the integrand, and that both functions are strongly measurable.
This is a variant of `BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt'` in an abelian group with a left-invariant
measure. This allows us to state the boundedness and measurability of `g` in a more natural way. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [SFinite μ] {x₀ : G} {s : Set G}
(hbg : BddAbove ((fun i => ‖g i‖) '' ((fun t => x₀ - t) ⁻¹' s))) (hs : MeasurableSet s)
(h2s : (support fun t => L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) ⊆ s) (hf : IntegrableOn f s μ)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt' L ?_ hs h2s hf ?_
· simp_rw [← sub_eq_neg_add, hbg]
· have : AEStronglyMeasurable g (map (fun t : G => x₀ - t) μ) :=
hmg.mono_ac (quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x₀).absolutelyContinuous
apply this.mono_measure
exact map_mono restrict_le_self (measurable_const.sub measurable_id')
variable {L} [MeasurableAdd G] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_flip :
ConvolutionExistsAt g f x L.flip μ ↔ ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ := by
simp_rw [ConvolutionExistsAt, ← integrable_comp_sub_left (fun t => L (f t) (g (x - t))) x,
sub_sub_cancel, flip_apply]
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.integrable_swap (h : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ) :
Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ := by
convert h.comp_sub_left x
simp_rw [sub_sub_self]
theorem convolutionExistsAt_iff_integrable_swap :
ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ ↔ Integrable (fun t => L (f (x - t)) (g t)) μ :=
convolutionExistsAt_flip.symm
end MeasurableGroup
variable [TopologicalSpace G] [IsTopologicalAddGroup G] [BorelSpace G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f)
(hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) : ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcf.convolutionExists_right L.flip hg hf x₀
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsLeft := HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_left
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right_of_continuous_left
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
ConvolutionExists f g L μ := fun x₀ =>
convolutionExistsAt_flip.mp <| hcg.convolutionExists_left_of_continuous_right L.flip hg hf x₀
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolutionExistsRightOfContinuousLeft :=
HasCompactSupport.convolutionExists_right_of_continuous_left
end CommGroup
end ConvolutionExists
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F]
/-- The convolution of two functions `f` and `g` with respect to a continuous bilinear map `L` and
measure `μ`. It is defined to be `(f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ`. -/
noncomputable def convolution [Sub G] (f : G → E) (g : G → E') (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
(μ : Measure G := by volume_tac) : G → F := fun x =>
∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and a measure `μ`. -/
scoped[Convolution] notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 ", " μ:67 "] " g:66 => convolution f g L μ
/-- The convolution of two functions with respect to a bilinear operation `L` and the volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆[" L:67 "]" g:66 => convolution f g L MeasureSpace.volume
/-- The convolution of two real-valued functions with respect to volume. -/
scoped[Convolution]
notation:67 f " ⋆ " g:66 =>
convolution f g (ContinuousLinearMap.lsmul ℝ ℝ) MeasureSpace.volume
open scoped Convolution
theorem convolution_def [Sub G] : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f t) (g (x - t)) ∂μ :=
rfl
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication.
Note: it often helps the elaborator to give the type of the convolution explicitly. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul [Sub G] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f t • g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
/-- The definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul [Sub G] [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f t * g (x - t) ∂μ :=
rfl
section Group
variable {L} [AddGroup G]
theorem smul_convolution [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : y • f ⋆[L, μ] g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, L.map_smul₂]
theorem convolution_smul [SMulCommClass ℝ 𝕜 F] {y : 𝕜} : f ⋆[L, μ] y • g = y • (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
ext; simp only [Pi.smul_apply, convolution_def, ← integral_smul, (L _).map_smul]
@[simp]
theorem zero_convolution : 0 ⋆[L, μ] g = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, L.map_zero₂, integral_zero]
@[simp]
theorem convolution_zero : f ⋆[L, μ] 0 = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [convolution_def, Pi.zero_apply, (L _).map_zero, integral_zero]
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.distrib_add {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x L μ) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g')) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f ⋆[L, μ] g') x := by
simp only [convolution_def, (L _).map_add, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
theorem ConvolutionExists.distrib_add (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f g' L μ) : f ⋆[L, μ] (g + g') = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).distrib_add (hfg' x)
theorem ConvolutionExistsAt.add_distrib {x : G} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f' g x L μ) :
((f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g) x = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x + (f' ⋆[L, μ] g) x := by
simp only [convolution_def, L.map_add₂, Pi.add_apply, integral_add hfg hfg']
theorem ConvolutionExists.add_distrib (hfg : ConvolutionExists f g L μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExists f' g L μ) : (f + f') ⋆[L, μ] g = f ⋆[L, μ] g + f' ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext x
exact (hfg x).add_distrib (hfg' x)
theorem convolution_mono_right {f g g' : G → ℝ} (hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x) :
(f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
apply integral_mono hfg hfg'
simp only [lsmul_apply, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
intro t
apply mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg _) (hf _)
theorem convolution_mono_right_of_nonneg {f g g' : G → ℝ}
(hfg' : ConvolutionExistsAt f g' x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ) (hf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hg : ∀ x, g x ≤ g' x)
(hg' : ∀ x, 0 ≤ g' x) : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x ≤ (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g') x := by
by_cases H : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x (lsmul ℝ ℝ) μ
· exact convolution_mono_right H hfg' hf hg
have : (f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g) x = 0 := integral_undef H
rw [this]
exact integral_nonneg fun y => mul_nonneg (hf y) (hg' (x - y))
variable (L)
theorem convolution_congr [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ]
[IsAddRightInvariant μ] (h1 : f =ᵐ[μ] f') (h2 : g =ᵐ[μ] g') : f ⋆[L, μ] g = f' ⋆[L, μ] g' := by
ext x
apply integral_congr_ae
exact (h1.prodMk <| h2.comp_tendsto
(quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ x).tendsto_ae).fun_comp ↿fun x y ↦ L x y
theorem support_convolution_subset_swap : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support g + support f := by
intro x h2x
by_contra hx
apply h2x
simp_rw [Set.mem_add, ← exists_and_left, not_exists, not_and_or, nmem_support] at hx
rw [convolution_def]
convert integral_zero G F using 2
ext t
rcases hx (x - t) t with (h | h | h)
· rw [h, (L _).map_zero]
· rw [h, L.map_zero₂]
· exact (h <| sub_add_cancel x t).elim
section
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [SFinite μ] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem Integrable.integrable_convolution (hf : Integrable f μ)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : Integrable (f ⋆[L, μ] g) μ :=
(hf.convolution_integrand L hg).integral_prod_left
end
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G]
protected theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.convolution [T2Space G] (hcf : HasCompactSupport f)
(hcg : HasCompactSupport g) : HasCompactSupport (f ⋆[L, μ] g) :=
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).of_isClosed_subset isClosed_closure <|
closure_minimal
((support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans <| add_subset_add subset_closure subset_closure)
(hcg.isCompact.add hcf).isClosed
variable [BorelSpace G] [TopologicalSpace P]
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in a subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`). -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param {g : P → G → E'} {s : Set P} {k : Set G}
(hk : IsCompact k) (hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) :
ContinuousOn (fun q : P × G => (f ⋆[L, μ] g q.1) q.2) (s ×ˢ univ) := by
/- First get rid of the case where the space is not locally compact. Then `g` vanishes everywhere
and the conclusion is trivial. -/
by_cases H : ∀ p ∈ s, ∀ x, g p x = 0
· apply (continuousOn_const (c := 0)).congr
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ ⟨hp, -⟩
apply integral_eq_zero_of_ae (Eventually.of_forall (fun y ↦ ?_))
simp [H p hp _]
have : LocallyCompactSpace G := by
push_neg at H
rcases H with ⟨p, hp, x, hx⟩
have A : support (g p) ⊆ k := support_subset_iff'.2 (fun y hy ↦ hgs p y hp hy)
have B : Continuous (g p) := by
refine hg.comp_continuous (.prodMk_right _) fun x => ?_
simpa only [prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_true] using hp
rcases eq_zero_or_locallyCompactSpace_of_support_subset_isCompact_of_addGroup hk A B with H|H
· simp [H] at hx
· exact H
/- Since `G` is locally compact, one may thicken `k` a little bit into a larger compact set
`(-k) + t`, outside of which all functions that appear in the convolution vanish. Then we can
apply a continuity statement for integrals depending on a parameter, with respect to
locally integrable functions and compactly supported continuous functions. -/
rintro ⟨q₀, x₀⟩ ⟨hq₀, -⟩
obtain ⟨t, t_comp, ht⟩ : ∃ t, IsCompact t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝 x₀ := exists_compact_mem_nhds x₀
let k' : Set G := (-k) +ᵥ t
have k'_comp : IsCompact k' := IsCompact.vadd_set hk.neg t_comp
let g' : (P × G) → G → E' := fun p x ↦ g p.1 (p.2 - x)
let s' : Set (P × G) := s ×ˢ t
have A : ContinuousOn g'.uncurry (s' ×ˢ univ) := by
have : g'.uncurry = g.uncurry ∘ (fun w ↦ (w.1.1, w.1.2 - w.2)) := by ext y; rfl
rw [this]
refine hg.comp (by fun_prop) ?_
simp +contextual [s', MapsTo]
have B : ContinuousOn (fun a ↦ ∫ x, L (f x) (g' a x) ∂μ) s' := by
apply continuousOn_integral_bilinear_of_locally_integrable_of_compact_support L k'_comp A _
(hf.integrableOn_isCompact k'_comp)
rintro ⟨p, x⟩ y ⟨hp, hx⟩ hy
apply hgs p _ hp
contrapose! hy
exact ⟨y - x, by simpa using hy, x, hx, by simp⟩
apply ContinuousWithinAt.mono_of_mem_nhdsWithin (B (q₀, x₀) ⟨hq₀, mem_of_mem_nhds ht⟩)
exact mem_nhdsWithin_prod_iff.2 ⟨s, self_mem_nhdsWithin, t, nhdsWithin_le_nhds ht, Subset.rfl⟩
/-- The convolution `f * g` is continuous if `f` is locally integrable and `g` is continuous and
compactly supported. Version where `g` depends on an additional parameter in an open subset `s` of
a parameter space `P` (and the compact support `k` is independent of the parameter in `s`),
given in terms of compositions with an additional continuous map. -/
theorem continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp {s : Set P} {v : P → G}
(hv : ContinuousOn v s) {g : P → G → E'} {k : Set G} (hk : IsCompact k)
(hgs : ∀ p, ∀ x, p ∈ s → x ∉ k → g p x = 0) (hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ)
(hg : ContinuousOn (↿g) (s ×ˢ univ)) : ContinuousOn (fun x => (f ⋆[L, μ] g x) (v x)) s := by
apply
(continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param L hk hgs hf hg).comp (continuousOn_id.prodMk hv)
intro x hx
simp only [hx, prodMk_mem_set_prod_eq, mem_univ, and_self_iff, _root_.id]
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is locally integrable and the other has compact
support and is continuous. -/
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_right (hcg : HasCompactSupport g)
(hf : LocallyIntegrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) : Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ]
let g' : G → G → E' := fun _ q => g q
have : ContinuousOn (↿g') (univ ×ˢ univ) := (hg.comp continuous_snd).continuousOn
exact continuousOn_convolution_right_with_param_comp L
(continuous_iff_continuousOn_univ.1 continuous_id) hcg
(fun p x _ hx => image_eq_zero_of_nmem_tsupport hx) hf this
/-- The convolution is continuous if one function is integrable and the other is bounded and
continuous. -/
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E']
(hbg : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖g x‖)) (hf : Integrable f μ) (hg : Continuous g) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
refine continuous_iff_continuousAt.mpr fun x₀ => ?_
have : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 x₀, ∀ᵐ t : G ∂μ, ‖L (f t) (g (x - t))‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ * ⨆ i, ‖g i‖ := by
filter_upwards with x; filter_upwards with t
apply_rules [L.le_of_opNorm₂_le_of_le, le_rfl, le_ciSup hbg (x - t)]
refine continuousAt_of_dominated ?_ this ?_ ?_
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun x =>
hf.aestronglyMeasurable.convolution_integrand_snd' L hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact (hf.norm.const_mul _).mul_const _
· exact Eventually.of_forall fun t => (L.continuous₂.comp₂ continuous_const <|
hg.comp <| continuous_id.sub continuous_const).continuousAt
end Group
section CommGroup
variable [AddCommGroup G]
theorem support_convolution_subset : support (f ⋆[L, μ] g) ⊆ support f + support g :=
(support_convolution_subset_swap L).trans (add_comm _ _).subset
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [IsNegInvariant μ]
section Measurable
variable [MeasurableNeg G]
variable [MeasurableAdd G]
/-- Commutativity of convolution -/
theorem convolution_flip : g ⋆[L.flip, μ] f = f ⋆[L, μ] g := by
ext1 x
simp_rw [convolution_def]
rw [← integral_sub_left_eq_self _ μ x]
simp_rw [sub_sub_self, flip_apply]
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution. -/
theorem convolution_eq_swap : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x = ∫ t, L (f (x - t)) (g t) ∂μ := by
rw [← convolution_flip]; rfl
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_lsmul_swap {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → F} :
(f ⋆[lsmul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g : G → F) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) • g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
/-- The symmetric definition of convolution where the bilinear operator is multiplication. -/
theorem convolution_mul_swap [NormedSpace ℝ 𝕜] {f : G → 𝕜} {g : G → 𝕜} :
(f ⋆[mul 𝕜 𝕜, μ] g) x = ∫ t, f (x - t) * g t ∂μ :=
convolution_eq_swap _
/-- The convolution of two even functions is also even. -/
theorem convolution_neg_of_neg_eq (h1 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, f (-x) = f x) (h2 : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, g (-x) = g x) :
(f ⋆[L, μ] g) (-x) = (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x :=
calc
∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (-x - t)) ∂μ = ∫ t : G, (L (f (-t))) (g (x + t)) ∂μ := by
apply integral_congr_ae
filter_upwards [h1, (eventually_add_left_iff μ x).2 h2] with t ht h't
simp_rw [ht, ← h't, neg_add']
_ = ∫ t : G, (L (f t)) (g (x - t)) ∂μ := by
rw [← integral_neg_eq_self]
simp only [neg_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
end Measurable
variable [TopologicalSpace G]
variable [IsTopologicalAddGroup G]
variable [BorelSpace G]
theorem _root_.HasCompactSupport.continuous_convolution_left
(hcf : HasCompactSupport f) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : LocallyIntegrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hcf.continuous_convolution_right L.flip hg hf
theorem _root_.BddAbove.continuous_convolution_left_of_integrable
[FirstCountableTopology G] [SecondCountableTopologyEither G E]
(hbf : BddAbove (range fun x => ‖f x‖)) (hf : Continuous f) (hg : Integrable g μ) :
Continuous (f ⋆[L, μ] g) := by
rw [← convolution_flip]
exact hbf.continuous_convolution_right_of_integrable L.flip hg hf
end CommGroup
section NormedAddCommGroup
variable [SeminormedAddCommGroup G]
/-- Compute `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is within `Metric.ball 0 R`, and `g` is constant
on `Metric.ball x₀ R`.
We can simplify the RHS further if we assume `f` is integrable, but also if `L = (•)` or more
generally if `L` has an `AntilipschitzWith`-condition. -/
theorem convolution_eq_right' {x₀ : G} {R : ℝ} (hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, g x = g x₀) : (f ⋆[L, μ] g) x₀ = ∫ t, L (f t) (g x₀) ∂μ := by
have h2 : ∀ t, L (f t) (g (x₀ - t)) = L (f t) (g x₀) := fun t ↦ by
by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
rw [hg h2t]
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
simp_rw [convolution_def, h2]
variable [BorelSpace G] [SecondCountableTopology G]
variable [IsAddLeftInvariant μ] [SFinite μ]
/-- Approximate `(f ⋆ g) x₀` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near
`g x₀` on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`. See `dist_convolution_le` for a special case.
We can simplify the second argument of `dist` further if we add some extra type-classes on `E`
and `𝕜` or if `L` is scalar multiplication. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le' {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε) (hif : Integrable f μ)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ)
(hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[L, μ] g : G → F) x₀) (∫ t, L (f t) z₀ ∂μ) ≤ (‖L‖ * ∫ x, ‖f x‖ ∂μ) * ε := by
have hfg : ConvolutionExistsAt f g x₀ L μ := by
refine BddAbove.convolutionExistsAt L ?_ Metric.isOpen_ball.measurableSet (Subset.trans ?_ hf)
hif.integrableOn hmg
swap; · refine fun t => mt fun ht : f t = 0 => ?_; simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂]
rw [bddAbove_def]
refine ⟨‖z₀‖ + ε, ?_⟩
rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩
refine norm_le_norm_add_const_of_dist_le (hg x ?_)
rwa [mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_sub_rev, ← mem_ball_zero_iff]
have h2 : ∀ t, dist (L (f t) (g (x₀ - t))) (L (f t) z₀) ≤ ‖L (f t)‖ * ε := by
intro t; by_cases ht : t ∈ support f
· have h2t := hf ht
rw [mem_ball_zero_iff] at h2t
specialize hg (x₀ - t)
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, add_mem_ball_iff_norm, norm_neg, ← sub_eq_add_neg] at hg
refine ((L (f t)).dist_le_opNorm _ _).trans ?_
exact mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_left (hg h2t) (norm_nonneg _)
· rw [nmem_support] at ht
simp_rw [ht, L.map_zero₂, L.map_zero, norm_zero, zero_mul, dist_self]
rfl
simp_rw [convolution_def]
simp_rw [dist_eq_norm] at h2 ⊢
rw [← integral_sub hfg.integrable]; swap; · exact (L.flip z₀).integrable_comp hif
refine (norm_integral_le_of_norm_le ((L.integrable_comp hif).norm.mul_const ε)
(Eventually.of_forall h2)).trans ?_
rw [integral_mul_const]
refine mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right ?_ hε
have h3 : ∀ t, ‖L (f t)‖ ≤ ‖L‖ * ‖f t‖ := by
intro t
exact L.le_opNorm (f t)
refine (integral_mono (L.integrable_comp hif).norm (hif.norm.const_mul _) h3).trans_eq ?_
rw [integral_const_mul]
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] [NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E']
/-- Approximate `f ⋆ g` if the support of the `f` is bounded within a ball, and `g` is near `g x₀`
on a ball with the same radius around `x₀`.
This is a special case of `dist_convolution_le'` where `L` is `(•)`, `f` has integral 1 and `f` is
nonnegative. -/
theorem dist_convolution_le {f : G → ℝ} {x₀ : G} {R ε : ℝ} {z₀ : E'} (hε : 0 ≤ ε)
(hf : support f ⊆ ball (0 : G) R) (hnf : ∀ x, 0 ≤ f x) (hintf : ∫ x, f x ∂μ = 1)
(hmg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hg : ∀ x ∈ ball x₀ R, dist (g x) z₀ ≤ ε) :
dist ((f ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g : G → E') x₀) z₀ ≤ ε := by
have hif : Integrable f μ := integrable_of_integral_eq_one hintf
convert (dist_convolution_le' (lsmul ℝ ℝ) hε hif hf hmg hg).trans _
· simp_rw [lsmul_apply, integral_smul_const, hintf, one_smul]
· simp_rw [Real.norm_of_nonneg (hnf _), hintf, mul_one]
exact (mul_le_mul_of_nonneg_right opNorm_lsmul_le hε).trans_eq (one_mul ε)
/-- `(φ i ⋆ g i) (k i)` tends to `z₀` as `i` tends to some filter `l` if
* `φ` is a sequence of nonnegative functions with integral `1` as `i` tends to `l`;
* The support of `φ` tends to small neighborhoods around `(0 : G)` as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i` is `mu`-a.e. strongly measurable as `i` tends to `l`;
* `g i x` tends to `z₀` as `(i, x)` tends to `l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀`;
* `k i` tends to `x₀`.
See also `ContDiffBump.convolution_tendsto_right`.
-/
theorem convolution_tendsto_right {ι} {g : ι → G → E'} {l : Filter ι} {x₀ : G} {z₀ : E'}
{φ : ι → G → ℝ} {k : ι → G} (hnφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∀ x, 0 ≤ φ i x)
(hiφ : ∀ᶠ i in l, ∫ x, φ i x ∂μ = 1)
-- todo: we could weaken this to "the integral tends to 1"
(hφ : Tendsto (fun n => support (φ n)) l (𝓝 0).smallSets)
(hmg : ∀ᶠ i in l, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) (hcg : Tendsto (uncurry g) (l ×ˢ 𝓝 x₀) (𝓝 z₀))
(hk : Tendsto k l (𝓝 x₀)) :
Tendsto (fun i : ι => (φ i ⋆[lsmul ℝ ℝ, μ] g i : G → E') (k i)) l (𝓝 z₀) := by
simp_rw [tendsto_smallSets_iff] at hφ
rw [Metric.tendsto_nhds] at hcg ⊢
simp_rw [Metric.eventually_prod_nhds_iff] at hcg
intro ε hε
have h2ε : 0 < ε / 3 := div_pos hε (by norm_num)
obtain ⟨p, hp, δ, hδ, hgδ⟩ := hcg _ h2ε
dsimp only [uncurry] at hgδ
have h2k := hk.eventually (ball_mem_nhds x₀ <| half_pos hδ)
have h2φ := hφ (ball (0 : G) _) <| ball_mem_nhds _ (half_pos hδ)
filter_upwards [hp, h2k, h2φ, hnφ, hiφ, hmg] with i hpi hki hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi
have hgi : dist (g i (k i)) z₀ < ε / 3 := hgδ hpi (hki.trans <| half_lt_self hδ)
have h1 : ∀ x' ∈ ball (k i) (δ / 2), dist (g i x') (g i (k i)) ≤ ε / 3 + ε / 3 := by
intro x' hx'
refine (dist_triangle_right _ _ _).trans (add_le_add (hgδ hpi ?_).le hgi.le)
exact ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add hx'.out hki)).trans_eq (add_halves δ)
have := dist_convolution_le (add_pos h2ε h2ε).le hφi hnφi hiφi hmgi h1
refine ((dist_triangle _ _ _).trans_lt (add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt this hgi)).trans_eq ?_
field_simp; ring_nf
end NormedAddCommGroup
end Measurability
end NontriviallyNormedField
open scoped Convolution
section RCLike
variable [RCLike 𝕜]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E']
variable [NormedSpace 𝕜 E'']
variable [NormedSpace ℝ F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {n : ℕ∞}
variable [MeasurableSpace G] {μ ν : Measure G}
variable (L : E →L[𝕜] E' →L[𝕜] F)
section Assoc
variable [CompleteSpace F]
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F'] [NormedSpace ℝ F'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F'] [CompleteSpace F']
variable [NormedAddCommGroup F''] [NormedSpace ℝ F''] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F''] [CompleteSpace F'']
variable {k : G → E''}
variable (L₂ : F →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₃ : E →L[𝕜] F'' →L[𝕜] F')
variable (L₄ : E' →L[𝕜] E'' →L[𝕜] F'')
variable [AddGroup G]
variable [SFinite μ] [SFinite ν] [IsAddRightInvariant μ]
theorem integral_convolution [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [MeasurableNeg G] [NormedSpace ℝ E]
[NormedSpace ℝ E'] [CompleteSpace E] [CompleteSpace E'] (hf : Integrable f ν)
(hg : Integrable g μ) : ∫ x, (f ⋆[L, ν] g) x ∂μ = L (∫ x, f x ∂ν) (∫ x, g x ∂μ) := by
refine (integral_integral_swap (by apply hf.convolution_integrand L hg)).trans ?_
simp_rw [integral_comp_comm _ (hg.comp_sub_right _), integral_sub_right_eq_self]
exact (L.flip (∫ x, g x ∂μ)).integral_comp_comm hf
variable [MeasurableAdd₂ G] [IsAddRightInvariant ν] [MeasurableNeg G]
/-- Convolution is associative. This has a weak but inconvenient integrability condition.
See also `MeasureTheory.convolution_assoc`. -/
theorem convolution_assoc' (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z))
{x₀ : G} (hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt g k x L₄ μ)
(hi : Integrable (uncurry fun x y => (L₃ (f y)) ((L₄ (g (x - y))) (k (x₀ - x)))) (μ.prod ν)) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ :=
calc
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = ∫ t, L₂ (∫ s, L (f s) (g (t - s)) ∂ν) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂μ := rfl
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₂ (L (f s) (g (t - s))) (k (x₀ - t)) ∂ν ∂μ :=
(integral_congr_ae (hfg.mono fun t ht => ((L₂.flip (k (x₀ - t))).integral_comp_comm ht).symm))
_ = ∫ t, ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂ν ∂μ := by simp_rw [hL]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ t, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g (t - s)) (k (x₀ - t))) ∂μ ∂ν := by rw [integral_integral_swap hi]
_ = ∫ s, ∫ u, L₃ (f s) (L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u))) ∂μ ∂ν := by
congr; ext t
rw [eq_comm, ← integral_sub_right_eq_self _ t]
simp_rw [sub_sub_sub_cancel_right]
_ = ∫ s, L₃ (f s) (∫ u, L₄ (g u) (k (x₀ - s - u)) ∂μ) ∂ν := by
refine integral_congr_ae ?_
refine ((quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant ν x₀).ae hgk).mono fun t ht => ?_
exact (L₃ (f t)).integral_comp_comm ht
_ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := rfl
/-- Convolution is associative. This requires that
* all maps are a.e. strongly measurable w.r.t one of the measures
* `f ⋆[L, ν] g` exists almost everywhere
* `‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖` exists almost everywhere
* `‖f‖ ⋆[ν] (‖g‖ ⋆[μ] ‖k‖)` exists at `x₀` -/
theorem convolution_assoc (hL : ∀ (x : E) (y : E') (z : E''), L₂ (L x y) z = L₃ x (L₄ y z)) {x₀ : G}
(hf : AEStronglyMeasurable f ν) (hg : AEStronglyMeasurable g μ) (hk : AEStronglyMeasurable k μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ y ∂μ, ConvolutionExistsAt f g y L ν)
(hgk : ∀ᵐ x ∂ν, ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖g x‖) (fun x => ‖k x‖) x (mul ℝ ℝ) μ)
(hfgk :
ConvolutionExistsAt (fun x => ‖f x‖) ((fun x => ‖g x‖) ⋆[mul ℝ ℝ, μ] fun x => ‖k x‖) x₀
(mul ℝ ℝ) ν) :
((f ⋆[L, ν] g) ⋆[L₂, μ] k) x₀ = (f ⋆[L₃, ν] g ⋆[L₄, μ] k) x₀ := by
refine convolution_assoc' L L₂ L₃ L₄ hL hfg (hgk.mono fun x hx => hx.of_norm L₄ hg hk) ?_
-- the following is similar to `Integrable.convolution_integrand`
have h_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x))))
(μ.prod ν) := by
refine L₃.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hf.snd ?_
refine L₄.aestronglyMeasurable_comp₂ hg.fst ?_
refine (hk.mono_ac ?_).comp_measurable
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst)
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.absolutelyContinuous ?_
refine QuasiMeasurePreserving.prod_of_left
((measurable_const.sub measurable_snd).sub measurable_fst) (Eventually.of_forall fun y => ?_)
dsimp only
exact quasiMeasurePreserving_sub_left_of_right_invariant μ _
| have h2_meas :
AEStronglyMeasurable (fun y => ∫ x, ‖L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))‖ ∂μ) ν :=
h_meas.prod_swap.norm.integral_prod_right'
have h3 : map (fun z : G × G => (z.1 - z.2, z.2)) (μ.prod ν) = μ.prod ν :=
(measurePreserving_sub_prod μ ν).map_eq
suffices Integrable (uncurry fun x y => L₃ (f y) (L₄ (g x) (k (x₀ - y - x)))) (μ.prod ν) by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convolution.lean | 917 | 922 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Kalle Kytölä. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kalle Kytölä
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.ProbabilityMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Prod
/-!
# Products of finite measures and probability measures
This file introduces binary products of finite measures and probability measures. The constructions
are obtained from special cases of products of general measures. Taking products nevertheless has
specific properties in the cases of finite measures and probability measures, notably the fact that
the product measures depend continuously on their factors in the topology of weak convergence when
the underlying space is metrizable and separable.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.FiniteMeasure.prod`: The product of two finite measures.
* `MeasureTheory.ProbabilityMeasure.prod`: The product of two probability measures.
## TODO
* Add continuous dependence of the product measures on the factors.
-/
open MeasureTheory Topology Metric Filter Set ENNReal NNReal
open scoped Topology ENNReal NNReal BoundedContinuousFunction
namespace MeasureTheory
section FiniteMeasure_product
namespace FiniteMeasure
variable {α : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] {β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace β]
/-- The binary product of finite measures. -/
noncomputable def prod (μ : FiniteMeasure α) (ν : FiniteMeasure β) : FiniteMeasure (α × β) :=
⟨μ.toMeasure.prod ν.toMeasure, inferInstance⟩
variable (μ : FiniteMeasure α) (ν : FiniteMeasure β)
@[simp] lemma toMeasure_prod : (μ.prod ν).toMeasure = μ.toMeasure.prod ν.toMeasure := rfl
lemma prod_apply (s : Set (α × β)) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod ν s = ENNReal.toNNReal (∫⁻ x, ν.toMeasure (Prod.mk x ⁻¹' s) ∂μ) := by
simp [coeFn_def, Measure.prod_apply s_mble]
lemma prod_apply_symm (s : Set (α × β)) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
μ.prod ν s = ENNReal.toNNReal (∫⁻ y, μ.toMeasure ((fun x ↦ ⟨x, y⟩) ⁻¹' s) ∂ν) := by
simp [coeFn_def, Measure.prod_apply_symm s_mble]
lemma prod_prod (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : μ.prod ν (s ×ˢ t) = μ s * ν t := by simp [coeFn_def]
@[simp] lemma mass_prod : (μ.prod ν).mass = μ.mass * ν.mass := by
simp only [coeFn_def, mass, univ_prod_univ.symm, toMeasure_prod]
rw [← ENNReal.toNNReal_mul]
exact congr_arg ENNReal.toNNReal (Measure.prod_prod univ univ)
@[simp] lemma zero_prod : (0 : FiniteMeasure α).prod ν = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, mass_prod, zero_mass, zero_mul]
@[simp] lemma prod_zero : μ.prod (0 : FiniteMeasure β) = 0 := by
rw [← mass_zero_iff, mass_prod, zero_mass, mul_zero]
@[simp] lemma map_fst_prod : (μ.prod ν).map Prod.fst = ν univ • μ := by ext; simp
| @[simp] lemma map_snd_prod : (μ.prod ν).map Prod.snd = μ univ • ν := by ext; simp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/FiniteMeasureProd.lean | 71 | 71 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Kim Morrison. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kim Morrison, Shing Tak Lam, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Intervals
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Ring.List
import Mathlib.Data.Int.ModEq
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Bits
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Log
import Mathlib.Data.List.Palindrome
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
import Mathlib.Tactic.Linarith
import Mathlib.Tactic.Ring
/-!
# Digits of a natural number
This provides a basic API for extracting the digits of a natural number in a given base,
and reconstructing numbers from their digits.
We also prove some divisibility tests based on digits, in particular completing
Theorem #85 from https://www.cs.ru.nl/~freek/100/.
Also included is a bound on the length of `Nat.toDigits` from core.
## TODO
A basic `norm_digits` tactic for proving goals of the form `Nat.digits a b = l` where `a` and `b`
are numerals is not yet ported.
-/
namespace Nat
variable {n : ℕ}
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux0 : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 => [n + 1]
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux1 (n : ℕ) : List ℕ :=
List.replicate n 1
/-- (Impl.) An auxiliary definition for `digits`, to help get the desired definitional unfolding. -/
def digitsAux (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => []
| n + 1 =>
((n + 1) % b) :: digitsAux b h ((n + 1) / b)
decreasing_by exact Nat.div_lt_self (Nat.succ_pos _) h
@[simp]
theorem digitsAux_zero (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) : digitsAux b h 0 = [] := by rw [digitsAux]
theorem digitsAux_def (b : ℕ) (h : 2 ≤ b) (n : ℕ) (w : 0 < n) :
digitsAux b h n = (n % b) :: digitsAux b h (n / b) := by
cases n
· cases w
· rw [digitsAux]
/-- `digits b n` gives the digits, in little-endian order,
of a natural number `n` in a specified base `b`.
In any base, we have `ofDigits b L = L.foldr (fun x y ↦ x + b * y) 0`.
* For any `2 ≤ b`, we have `l < b` for any `l ∈ digits b n`,
and the last digit is not zero.
This uniquely specifies the behaviour of `digits b`.
* For `b = 1`, we define `digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1`.
* For `b = 0`, we define `digits 0 n = [n]`, except `digits 0 0 = []`.
Note this differs from the existing `Nat.toDigits` in core, which is used for printing numerals.
In particular, `Nat.toDigits b 0 = ['0']`, while `digits b 0 = []`.
-/
def digits : ℕ → ℕ → List ℕ
| 0 => digitsAux0
| 1 => digitsAux1
| b + 2 => digitsAux (b + 2) (by norm_num)
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero (b : ℕ) : digits b 0 = [] := by
rcases b with (_ | ⟨_ | ⟨_⟩⟩) <;> simp [digits, digitsAux0, digitsAux1]
theorem digits_zero_zero : digits 0 0 = [] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_zero_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 0 n.succ = [n + 1] :=
rfl
theorem digits_zero_succ' : ∀ {n : ℕ}, n ≠ 0 → digits 0 n = [n]
| 0, h => (h rfl).elim
| _ + 1, _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem digits_one (n : ℕ) : digits 1 n = List.replicate n 1 :=
rfl
-- no `@[simp]`: dsimp can prove this
theorem digits_one_succ (n : ℕ) : digits 1 (n + 1) = 1 :: digits 1 n :=
rfl
theorem digits_add_two_add_one (b n : ℕ) :
digits (b + 2) (n + 1) = ((n + 1) % (b + 2)) :: digits (b + 2) ((n + 1) / (b + 2)) := by
simp [digits, digitsAux_def]
@[simp]
lemma digits_of_two_le_of_pos {b : ℕ} (hb : 2 ≤ b) (hn : 0 < n) :
Nat.digits b n = n % b :: Nat.digits b (n / b) := by
rw [Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hb rfl, Nat.eq_add_of_sub_eq hn rfl, Nat.digits_add_two_add_one]
theorem digits_def' :
∀ {b : ℕ} (_ : 1 < b) {n : ℕ} (_ : 0 < n), digits b n = (n % b) :: digits b (n / b)
| 0, h => absurd h (by decide)
| 1, h => absurd h (by decide)
| b + 2, _ => digitsAux_def _ (by simp) _
@[simp]
theorem digits_of_lt (b x : ℕ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hxb : x < b) : digits b x = [x] := by
rcases exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero hx with ⟨x, rfl⟩
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' ((Nat.le_add_left 1 x).trans_lt hxb) with ⟨b, rfl⟩
rw [digits_add_two_add_one, div_eq_of_lt hxb, digits_zero, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
theorem digits_add (b : ℕ) (h : 1 < b) (x y : ℕ) (hxb : x < b) (hxy : x ≠ 0 ∨ y ≠ 0) :
digits b (x + b * y) = x :: digits b y := by
rcases Nat.exists_eq_add_of_le' h with ⟨b, rfl : _ = _ + 2⟩
cases y
· simp [hxb, hxy.resolve_right (absurd rfl)]
| dsimp [digits]
rw [digitsAux_def]
· congr
· simp [Nat.add_mod, mod_eq_of_lt hxb]
· simp [add_mul_div_left, div_eq_of_lt hxb]
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Digits.lean | 129 | 133 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Michael Jendrusch. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Michael Jendrusch, Kim Morrison, Bhavik Mehta, Jakob von Raumer
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.EqToHom
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Functor.Trifunctor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Products.Basic
/-!
# Monoidal categories
A monoidal category is a category equipped with a tensor product, unitors, and an associator.
In the definition, we provide the tensor product as a pair of functions
* `tensorObj : C → C → C`
* `tensorHom : (X₁ ⟶ Y₁) → (X₂ ⟶ Y₂) → ((X₁ ⊗ X₂) ⟶ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂))`
and allow use of the overloaded notation `⊗` for both.
The unitors and associator are provided componentwise.
The tensor product can be expressed as a functor via `tensor : C × C ⥤ C`.
The unitors and associator are gathered together as natural
isomorphisms in `leftUnitor_nat_iso`, `rightUnitor_nat_iso` and `associator_nat_iso`.
Some consequences of the definition are proved in other files after proving the coherence theorem,
e.g. `(λ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom = (ρ_ (𝟙_ C)).hom` in `CategoryTheory.Monoidal.CoherenceLemmas`.
## Implementation notes
In the definition of monoidal categories, we also provide the whiskering operators:
* `whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : X ⊗ Y₁ ⟶ X ⊗ Y₂`, denoted by `X ◁ f`,
* `whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : X₁ ⊗ Y ⟶ X₂ ⊗ Y`, denoted by `f ▷ Y`.
These are products of an object and a morphism (the terminology "whiskering"
is borrowed from 2-category theory). The tensor product of morphisms `tensorHom` can be defined
in terms of the whiskerings. There are two possible such definitions, which are related by
the exchange property of the whiskerings. These two definitions are accessed by `tensorHom_def`
and `tensorHom_def'`. By default, `tensorHom` is defined so that `tensorHom_def` holds
definitionally.
If you want to provide `tensorHom` and define `whiskerLeft` and `whiskerRight` in terms of it,
you can use the alternative constructor `CategoryTheory.MonoidalCategory.ofTensorHom`.
The whiskerings are useful when considering simp-normal forms of morphisms in monoidal categories.
### Simp-normal form for morphisms
Rewriting involving associators and unitors could be very complicated. We try to ease this
complexity by putting carefully chosen simp lemmas that rewrite any morphisms into the simp-normal
form defined below. Rewriting into simp-normal form is especially useful in preprocessing
performed by the `coherence` tactic.
The simp-normal form of morphisms is defined to be an expression that has the minimal number of
parentheses. More precisely,
1. it is a composition of morphisms like `f₁ ≫ f₂ ≫ f₃ ≫ f₄ ≫ f₅` such that each `fᵢ` is
either a structural morphisms (morphisms made up only of identities, associators, unitors)
or non-structural morphisms, and
2. each non-structural morphism in the composition is of the form `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅`,
where each `Xᵢ` is a object that is not the identity or a tensor and `f` is a non-structural
morphisms that is not the identity or a composite.
Note that `X₁ ◁ X₂ ◁ X₃ ◁ f ▷ X₄ ▷ X₅` is actually `X₁ ◁ (X₂ ◁ (X₃ ◁ ((f ▷ X₄) ▷ X₅)))`.
Currently, the simp lemmas don't rewrite `𝟙 X ⊗ f` and `f ⊗ 𝟙 Y` into `X ◁ f` and `f ▷ Y`,
respectively, since it requires a huge refactoring. We hope to add these simp lemmas soon.
## References
* Tensor categories, Etingof, Gelaki, Nikshych, Ostrik,
http://www-math.mit.edu/~etingof/egnobookfinal.pdf
* <https://stacks.math.columbia.edu/tag/0FFK>.
-/
universe v u
open CategoryTheory.Category
open CategoryTheory.Iso
namespace CategoryTheory
/-- Auxiliary structure to carry only the data fields of (and provide notation for)
`MonoidalCategory`. -/
class MonoidalCategoryStruct (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] where
/-- curried tensor product of objects -/
tensorObj : C → C → C
/-- left whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerLeft (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) : tensorObj X Y₁ ⟶ tensorObj X Y₂
/-- right whiskering for morphisms -/
whiskerRight {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) : tensorObj X₁ Y ⟶ tensorObj X₂ Y
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
-- By default, it is defined in terms of whiskerings.
tensorHom {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) : (tensorObj X₁ X₂ ⟶ tensorObj Y₁ Y₂) :=
whiskerRight f X₂ ≫ whiskerLeft Y₁ g
/-- The tensor unity in the monoidal structure `𝟙_ C` -/
tensorUnit (C) : C
/-- The associator isomorphism `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
associator : ∀ X Y Z : C, tensorObj (tensorObj X Y) Z ≅ tensorObj X (tensorObj Y Z)
/-- The left unitor: `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
leftUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj tensorUnit X ≅ X
/-- The right unitor: `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≃ X` -/
rightUnitor : ∀ X : C, tensorObj X tensorUnit ≅ X
namespace MonoidalCategory
export MonoidalCategoryStruct
(tensorObj whiskerLeft whiskerRight tensorHom tensorUnit associator leftUnitor rightUnitor)
end MonoidalCategory
namespace MonoidalCategory
/-- Notation for `tensorObj`, the tensor product of objects in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorObj
/-- Notation for the `whiskerLeft` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixr:81 " ◁ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerLeft
/-- Notation for the `whiskerRight` operator of monoidal categories -/
scoped infixl:81 " ▷ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.whiskerRight
/-- Notation for `tensorHom`, the tensor product of morphisms in a monoidal category -/
scoped infixr:70 " ⊗ " => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorHom
/-- Notation for `tensorUnit`, the two-sided identity of `⊗` -/
scoped notation "𝟙_ " C:arg => MonoidalCategoryStruct.tensorUnit C
/-- Notation for the monoidal `associator`: `(X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≃ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)` -/
scoped notation "α_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.associator
/-- Notation for the `leftUnitor`: `𝟙_C ⊗ X ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "λ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.leftUnitor
/-- Notation for the `rightUnitor`: `X ⊗ 𝟙_C ≃ X` -/
scoped notation "ρ_" => MonoidalCategoryStruct.rightUnitor
/-- The property that the pentagon relation is satisfied by four objects
in a category equipped with a `MonoidalCategoryStruct`. -/
def Pentagon {C : Type u} [Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategoryStruct C]
(Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄ : C) : Prop :=
(α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom ▷ Y₄ ≫ (α_ Y₁ (Y₂ ⊗ Y₃) Y₄).hom ≫ Y₁ ◁ (α_ Y₂ Y₃ Y₄).hom =
(α_ (Y₁ ⊗ Y₂) Y₃ Y₄).hom ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ (Y₃ ⊗ Y₄)).hom
end MonoidalCategory
open MonoidalCategory
/--
In a monoidal category, we can take the tensor product of objects, `X ⊗ Y` and of morphisms `f ⊗ g`.
Tensor product does not need to be strictly associative on objects, but there is a
specified associator, `α_ X Y Z : (X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z ≅ X ⊗ (Y ⊗ Z)`. There is a tensor unit `𝟙_ C`,
with specified left and right unitor isomorphisms `λ_ X : 𝟙_ C ⊗ X ≅ X` and `ρ_ X : X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ≅ X`.
These associators and unitors satisfy the pentagon and triangle equations. -/
@[stacks 0FFK]
-- Porting note: The Mathport did not translate the temporary notation
class MonoidalCategory (C : Type u) [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] extends MonoidalCategoryStruct C where
tensorHom_def {X₁ Y₁ X₂ Y₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (g : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) :
f ⊗ g = (f ▷ X₂) ≫ (Y₁ ◁ g) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Tensor product of identity maps is the identity: `(𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂) = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂)` -/
tensor_id : ∀ X₁ X₂ : C, 𝟙 X₁ ⊗ 𝟙 X₂ = 𝟙 (X₁ ⊗ X₂) := by aesop_cat
/--
Tensor product of compositions is composition of tensor products:
`(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂)`
-/
tensor_comp :
∀ {X₁ Y₁ Z₁ X₂ Y₂ Z₂ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (g₁ : Y₁ ⟶ Z₁) (g₂ : Y₂ ⟶ Z₂),
(f₁ ≫ g₁) ⊗ (f₂ ≫ g₂) = (f₁ ⊗ f₂) ≫ (g₁ ⊗ g₂) := by
aesop_cat
whiskerLeft_id : ∀ (X Y : C), X ◁ 𝟙 Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
id_whiskerRight : ∀ (X Y : C), 𝟙 X ▷ Y = 𝟙 (X ⊗ Y) := by
aesop_cat
/-- Naturality of the associator isomorphism: `(f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃ ≃ f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)` -/
associator_naturality :
∀ {X₁ X₂ X₃ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃ : C} (f₁ : X₁ ⟶ Y₁) (f₂ : X₂ ⟶ Y₂) (f₃ : X₃ ⟶ Y₃),
((f₁ ⊗ f₂) ⊗ f₃) ≫ (α_ Y₁ Y₂ Y₃).hom = (α_ X₁ X₂ X₃).hom ≫ (f₁ ⊗ (f₂ ⊗ f₃)) := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the left unitor, commutativity of `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ 𝟙_ C ⊗ Y ⟶ Y` and `𝟙_ C ⊗ X ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
leftUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), 𝟙_ _ ◁ f ≫ (λ_ Y).hom = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
Naturality of the right unitor: commutativity of `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ Y` and `X ⊗ 𝟙_ C ⟶ X ⟶ Y`
-/
rightUnitor_naturality :
∀ {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y), f ▷ 𝟙_ _ ≫ (ρ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f := by
aesop_cat
/--
The pentagon identity relating the isomorphism between `X ⊗ (Y ⊗ (Z ⊗ W))` and `((X ⊗ Y) ⊗ Z) ⊗ W`
-/
pentagon :
∀ W X Y Z : C,
(α_ W X Y).hom ▷ Z ≫ (α_ W (X ⊗ Y) Z).hom ≫ W ◁ (α_ X Y Z).hom =
(α_ (W ⊗ X) Y Z).hom ≫ (α_ W X (Y ⊗ Z)).hom := by
aesop_cat
/--
The identity relating the isomorphisms between `X ⊗ (𝟙_ C ⊗ Y)`, `(X ⊗ 𝟙_ C) ⊗ Y` and `X ⊗ Y`
-/
triangle :
∀ X Y : C, (α_ X (𝟙_ _) Y).hom ≫ X ◁ (λ_ Y).hom = (ρ_ X).hom ▷ Y := by
aesop_cat
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensorHom_def
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.whiskerLeft_id
attribute [reassoc, simp] MonoidalCategory.id_whiskerRight
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [simp] MonoidalCategory.tensor_comp
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.associator_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.leftUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc] MonoidalCategory.rightUnitor_naturality
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.pentagon
attribute [reassoc (attr := simp)] MonoidalCategory.triangle
namespace MonoidalCategory
variable {C : Type u} [𝒞 : Category.{v} C] [MonoidalCategory C]
@[simp]
theorem id_tensorHom (X : C) {Y₁ Y₂ : C} (f : Y₁ ⟶ Y₂) :
𝟙 X ⊗ f = X ◁ f := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[simp]
theorem tensorHom_id {X₁ X₂ : C} (f : X₁ ⟶ X₂) (Y : C) :
f ⊗ 𝟙 Y = f ▷ Y := by
simp [tensorHom_def]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerLeft_comp (W : C) {X Y Z : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Y ⟶ Z) :
W ◁ (f ≫ g) = W ◁ f ≫ W ◁ g := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensor_comp, comp_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem id_whiskerLeft {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
𝟙_ C ◁ f = (λ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (λ_ Y).inv := by
rw [← assoc, ← leftUnitor_naturality]; simp [id_tensorHom]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem tensor_whiskerLeft (X Y : C) {Z Z' : C} (f : Z ⟶ Z') :
(X ⊗ Y) ◁ f = (α_ X Y Z).hom ≫ X ◁ Y ◁ f ≫ (α_ X Y Z').inv := by
simp only [← id_tensorHom, ← tensorHom_id]
rw [← assoc, ← associator_naturality]
simp
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem comp_whiskerRight {W X Y : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : X ⟶ Y) (Z : C) :
(f ≫ g) ▷ Z = f ▷ Z ≫ g ▷ Z := by
simp only [← tensorHom_id, ← tensor_comp, id_comp]
@[reassoc, simp]
theorem whiskerRight_id {X Y : C} (f : X ⟶ Y) :
f ▷ 𝟙_ C = (ρ_ X).hom ≫ f ≫ (ρ_ Y).inv := by
| rw [← assoc, ← rightUnitor_naturality]; simp [tensorHom_id]
@[reassoc, simp]
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Monoidal/Category.lean | 253 | 255 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Aaron Anderson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Aaron Anderson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.ModelTheory.Substructures
/-!
# Finitely Generated First-Order Structures
This file defines what it means for a first-order (sub)structure to be finitely or countably
generated, similarly to other finitely-generated objects in the algebra library.
## Main Definitions
- `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.FG` indicates that a substructure is finitely generated.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Structure.FG` indicates that a structure is finitely generated.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Substructure.CG` indicates that a substructure is countably generated.
- `FirstOrder.Language.Structure.CG` indicates that a structure is countably generated.
## TODO
Develop a more unified definition of finite generation using the theory of closure operators, or use
this definition of finite generation to define the others.
-/
open FirstOrder Set
namespace FirstOrder
namespace Language
open Structure
variable {L : Language} {M : Type*} [L.Structure M]
namespace Substructure
/-- A substructure of `M` is finitely generated if it is the closure of a finite subset of `M`. -/
def FG (N : L.Substructure M) : Prop :=
∃ S : Finset M, closure L S = N
theorem fg_def {N : L.Substructure M} : N.FG ↔ ∃ S : Set M, S.Finite ∧ closure L S = N :=
⟨fun ⟨t, h⟩ => ⟨_, Finset.finite_toSet t, h⟩, by
rintro ⟨t', h, rfl⟩
rcases Finite.exists_finset_coe h with ⟨t, rfl⟩
exact ⟨t, rfl⟩⟩
theorem fg_iff_exists_fin_generating_family {N : L.Substructure M} :
N.FG ↔ ∃ (n : ℕ) (s : Fin n → M), closure L (range s) = N := by
rw [fg_def]
constructor
· rintro ⟨S, Sfin, hS⟩
obtain ⟨n, f, rfl⟩ := Sfin.fin_embedding
exact ⟨n, f, hS⟩
· rintro ⟨n, s, hs⟩
exact ⟨range s, finite_range s, hs⟩
theorem fg_bot : (⊥ : L.Substructure M).FG :=
| ⟨∅, by rw [Finset.coe_empty, closure_empty]⟩
| Mathlib/ModelTheory/FinitelyGenerated.lean | 63 | 64 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Johan Commelin, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.MvPolynomial.Eval
/-!
# Renaming variables of polynomials
This file establishes the `rename` operation on multivariate polynomials,
which modifies the set of variables.
## Main declarations
* `MvPolynomial.rename`
* `MvPolynomial.renameEquiv`
## Notation
As in other polynomial files, we typically use the notation:
+ `σ τ α : Type*` (indexing the variables)
+ `R S : Type*` `[CommSemiring R]` `[CommSemiring S]` (the coefficients)
+ `s : σ →₀ ℕ`, a function from `σ` to `ℕ` which is zero away from a finite set.
This will give rise to a monomial in `MvPolynomial σ R` which mathematicians might call `X^s`
+ `r : R` elements of the coefficient ring
+ `i : σ`, with corresponding monomial `X i`, often denoted `X_i` by mathematicians
+ `p : MvPolynomial σ α`
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Function Finsupp AddMonoidAlgebra
variable {σ τ α R S : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [CommSemiring S]
namespace MvPolynomial
section Rename
/-- Rename all the variables in a multivariable polynomial. -/
def rename (f : σ → τ) : MvPolynomial σ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
aeval (X ∘ f)
theorem rename_C (f : σ → τ) (r : R) : rename f (C r) = C r :=
eval₂_C _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem rename_X (f : σ → τ) (i : σ) : rename f (X i : MvPolynomial σ R) = X (f i) :=
eval₂_X _ _ _
theorem map_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
map f (rename g p) = rename g (map f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p
(fun a => by simp only [map_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, map_add]) fun p n hp => by
simp only [hp, rename_X, map_X, map_mul]
lemma map_comp_rename (f : R →+* S) (g : σ → τ) :
(map f).comp (rename g).toRingHom = (rename g).toRingHom.comp (map f) :=
RingHom.ext fun p ↦ map_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename g (rename f p) = rename (g ∘ f) p :=
show rename g (eval₂ C (X ∘ f) p) = _ by
simp only [rename, aeval_eq_eval₂Hom]
-- Porting note: the Lean 3 proof of this was very fragile and included a nonterminal `simp`.
-- Hopefully this is less prone to breaking
rw [eval₂_comp_left (eval₂Hom (algebraMap R (MvPolynomial α R)) (X ∘ g)) C (X ∘ f) p]
simp only [comp_def, eval₂Hom_X']
refine eval₂Hom_congr ?_ rfl rfl
ext1; simp only [comp_apply, RingHom.coe_comp, eval₂Hom_C]
lemma rename_comp_rename (f : σ → τ) (g : τ → α) :
(rename (R := R) g).comp (rename f) = rename (g ∘ f) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ rename_rename f g p
@[simp]
theorem rename_id : rename id = AlgHom.id R (MvPolynomial σ R) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ eval₂_eta p
lemma rename_id_apply (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : rename id p = p := by
simp
theorem rename_monomial (f : σ → τ) (d : σ →₀ ℕ) (r : R) :
rename f (monomial d r) = monomial (d.mapDomain f) r := by
rw [rename, aeval_monomial, monomial_eq (s := Finsupp.mapDomain f d),
Finsupp.prod_mapDomain_index]
· rfl
· exact fun n => pow_zero _
· exact fun n i₁ i₂ => pow_add _ _ _
theorem rename_eq (f : σ → τ) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename f p = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) p := by
simp only [rename, aeval_def, eval₂, Finsupp.mapDomain, algebraMap_eq, comp_apply,
X_pow_eq_monomial, ← monomial_finsupp_sum_index]
rfl
theorem rename_injective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Injective f) :
Function.Injective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) := by
have :
(rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) = Finsupp.mapDomain (Finsupp.mapDomain f) :=
funext (rename_eq f)
rw [this]
exact Finsupp.mapDomain_injective (Finsupp.mapDomain_injective hf)
theorem rename_leftInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.LeftInverse f g) :
Function.LeftInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) := by
intro x
simp [hf.comp_eq_id]
theorem rename_rightInverse {f : σ → τ} {g : τ → σ} (hf : Function.RightInverse f g) :
Function.RightInverse (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) (rename g) :=
rename_leftInverse hf
theorem rename_surjective (f : σ → τ) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Surjective (rename f : MvPolynomial σ R → MvPolynomial τ R) :=
let ⟨_, hf⟩ := hf.hasRightInverse; rename_rightInverse hf |>.surjective
section
variable {f : σ → τ} (hf : Function.Injective f)
open Classical in
/-- Given a function between sets of variables `f : σ → τ` that is injective with proof `hf`,
`MvPolynomial.killCompl hf` is the `AlgHom` from `R[τ]` to `R[σ]` that is left inverse to
`rename f : R[σ] → R[τ]` and sends the variables in the complement of the range of `f` to `0`. -/
def killCompl : MvPolynomial τ R →ₐ[R] MvPolynomial σ R :=
aeval fun i => if h : i ∈ Set.range f then X <| (Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm ⟨i, h⟩ else 0
theorem killCompl_C (r : R) : killCompl hf (C r) = C r := algHom_C _ _
theorem killCompl_comp_rename : (killCompl hf).comp (rename f) = AlgHom.id R _ :=
algHom_ext fun i => by
dsimp
rw [rename, killCompl, aeval_X, comp_apply, aeval_X, dif_pos, Equiv.ofInjective_symm_apply]
@[simp]
theorem killCompl_rename_app (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : killCompl hf (rename f p) = p :=
AlgHom.congr_fun (killCompl_comp_rename hf) p
end
section
variable (R)
/-- `MvPolynomial.rename e` is an equivalence when `e` is. -/
@[simps apply]
def renameEquiv (f : σ ≃ τ) : MvPolynomial σ R ≃ₐ[R] MvPolynomial τ R :=
{ rename f with
toFun := rename f
invFun := rename f.symm
left_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.symm_comp_self, rename_id_apply]
right_inv := fun p => by rw [rename_rename, f.self_comp_symm, rename_id_apply] }
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_refl : renameEquiv R (Equiv.refl σ) = AlgEquiv.refl :=
AlgEquiv.ext (by simp)
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_symm (f : σ ≃ τ) : (renameEquiv R f).symm = renameEquiv R f.symm :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem renameEquiv_trans (e : σ ≃ τ) (f : τ ≃ α) :
(renameEquiv R e).trans (renameEquiv R f) = renameEquiv R (e.trans f) :=
AlgEquiv.ext (rename_rename e f)
end
section
variable (f : R →+* S) (k : σ → τ) (g : τ → S) (p : MvPolynomial σ R)
theorem eval₂_rename : (rename k p).eval₂ f g = p.eval₂ f (g ∘ k) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval_rename (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ R) : eval g (rename k p) = eval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem eval₂Hom_rename : eval₂Hom f g (rename k p) = eval₂Hom f (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂_rename _ _ _ _
theorem aeval_rename [Algebra R S] : aeval g (rename k p) = aeval (g ∘ k) p :=
eval₂Hom_rename _ _ _ _
lemma aeval_comp_rename [Algebra R S] :
(aeval (R := R) g).comp (rename k) = MvPolynomial.aeval (g ∘ k) :=
AlgHom.ext fun p ↦ aeval_rename k g p
theorem rename_eval₂ (g : τ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename k (p.eval₂ C (g ∘ k)) = (rename k p).eval₂ C (rename k ∘ g) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem rename_prod_mk_eval₂ (j : τ) (g : σ → MvPolynomial σ R) :
rename (Prod.mk j) (p.eval₂ C g) = p.eval₂ C fun x => rename (Prod.mk j) (g x) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval₂_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → S) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
(rename (Prod.mk i) p).eval₂ f g = eval₂ f (fun j => g (i, j)) p := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p <;>
· intros
simp [*]
theorem eval_rename_prod_mk (g : σ × τ → R) (i : σ) (p : MvPolynomial τ R) :
eval g (rename (Prod.mk i) p) = eval (fun j => g (i, j)) p :=
eval₂_rename_prod_mk (RingHom.id _) _ _ _
end
/-- Every polynomial is a polynomial in finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_finset_rename (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (s : Finset σ) (q : MvPolynomial { x // x ∈ s } R), p = rename (↑) q := by
classical
apply induction_on p
· intro r
exact ⟨∅, C r, by rw [rename_C]⟩
· rintro p q ⟨s, p, rfl⟩ ⟨t, q, rfl⟩
refine ⟨s ∪ t, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine rename (Subtype.map id ?_) p + rename (Subtype.map id ?_) q <;>
simp +contextual only [id, true_or, or_true,
Finset.mem_union, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [rename_rename, map_add]
rfl
· rintro p n ⟨s, p, rfl⟩
refine ⟨insert n s, ⟨?_, ?_⟩⟩
· refine rename (Subtype.map id ?_) p * X ⟨n, s.mem_insert_self n⟩
simp +contextual only [id, or_true, Finset.mem_insert, forall_true_iff]
· simp only [rename_rename, rename_X, Subtype.coe_mk, map_mul]
rfl
/-- `exists_finset_rename` for two polynomials at once: for any two polynomials `p₁`, `p₂` in a
polynomial semiring `R[σ]` of possibly infinitely many variables, `exists_finset_rename₂` yields
a finite subset `s` of `σ` such that both `p₁` and `p₂` are contained in the polynomial semiring
`R[s]` of finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_finset_rename₂ (p₁ p₂ : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (s : Finset σ) (q₁ q₂ : MvPolynomial s R), p₁ = rename (↑) q₁ ∧ p₂ = rename (↑) q₂ := by
obtain ⟨s₁, q₁, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p₁
obtain ⟨s₂, q₂, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p₂
classical
use s₁ ∪ s₂
use rename (Set.inclusion s₁.subset_union_left) q₁
use rename (Set.inclusion s₁.subset_union_right) q₂
constructor <;> simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- Every polynomial is a polynomial in finitely many variables. -/
theorem exists_fin_rename (p : MvPolynomial σ R) :
∃ (n : ℕ) (f : Fin n → σ) (_hf : Injective f) (q : MvPolynomial (Fin n) R), p = rename f q := by
obtain ⟨s, q, rfl⟩ := exists_finset_rename p
let n := Fintype.card { x // x ∈ s }
let e := Fintype.equivFin { x // x ∈ s }
refine ⟨n, (↑) ∘ e.symm, Subtype.val_injective.comp e.symm.injective, rename e q, ?_⟩
rw [← rename_rename, rename_rename e]
simp only [Function.comp_def, Equiv.symm_apply_apply, rename_rename]
| end Rename
theorem eval₂_cast_comp (f : σ → τ) (c : ℤ →+* R) (g : τ → R) (p : MvPolynomial σ ℤ) :
eval₂ c (g ∘ f) p = eval₂ c g (rename f p) := by
apply MvPolynomial.induction_on p (fun n => by simp only [eval₂_C, rename_C])
(fun p q hp hq => by simp only [hp, hq, rename, eval₂_add, map_add])
fun p n hp => by simp only [eval₂_mul, hp, eval₂_X, comp_apply, map_mul, rename_X, eval₂_mul]
| Mathlib/Algebra/MvPolynomial/Rename.lean | 272 | 279 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Joël Riou. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joël Riou
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions.ComposableArrows
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Localization.CalculusOfFractions.Preadditive
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Triangulated.Functor
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Shift.Localization
/-! # Localization of triangulated categories
If `L : C ⥤ D` is a localization functor for a class of morphisms `W` that is compatible
with the triangulation on the category `C` and admits a left calculus of fractions,
it is shown in this file that `D` can be equipped with a pretriangulated category structure,
and that it is triangulated.
## References
* [Jean-Louis Verdier, *Des catégories dérivées des catégories abéliennes*][verdier1996]
-/
assert_not_exists TwoSidedIdeal
namespace CategoryTheory
open Category Limits Pretriangulated Localization
variable {C D : Type*} [Category C] [Category D] (L : C ⥤ D)
[HasShift C ℤ] [Preadditive C] [HasZeroObject C]
[∀ (n : ℤ), (shiftFunctor C n).Additive] [Pretriangulated C]
[HasShift D ℤ] [L.CommShift ℤ]
namespace MorphismProperty
/-- Given `W` is a class of morphisms in a pretriangulated category `C`, this is the condition
that `W` is compatible with the triangulation on `C`. -/
class IsCompatibleWithTriangulation (W : MorphismProperty C) : Prop
extends W.IsCompatibleWithShift ℤ where
compatible_with_triangulation (T₁ T₂ : Triangle C)
(_ : T₁ ∈ distTriang C) (_ : T₂ ∈ distTriang C)
(a : T₁.obj₁ ⟶ T₂.obj₁) (b : T₁.obj₂ ⟶ T₂.obj₂) (_ : W a) (_ : W b)
(_ : T₁.mor₁ ≫ b = a ≫ T₂.mor₁) :
∃ (c : T₁.obj₃ ⟶ T₂.obj₃) (_ : W c),
(T₁.mor₂ ≫ c = b ≫ T₂.mor₂) ∧ (T₁.mor₃ ≫ a⟦1⟧' = c ≫ T₂.mor₃)
export IsCompatibleWithTriangulation (compatible_with_triangulation)
end MorphismProperty
namespace Functor
/-- Given a functor `C ⥤ D` from a pretriangulated category, this is the set of
triangles in `D` that are in the essential image of distinguished triangles of `C`. -/
def essImageDistTriang : Set (Triangle D) :=
fun T => ∃ (T' : Triangle C) (_ : T ≅ L.mapTriangle.obj T'), T' ∈ distTriang C
lemma essImageDistTriang_mem_of_iso {T₁ T₂ : Triangle D} (e : T₂ ≅ T₁)
(h : T₁ ∈ L.essImageDistTriang) : T₂ ∈ L.essImageDistTriang := by
obtain ⟨T', e', hT'⟩ := h
| exact ⟨T', e ≪≫ e', hT'⟩
lemma contractible_mem_essImageDistTriang [EssSurj L] [HasZeroObject D]
[HasZeroMorphisms D] [L.PreservesZeroMorphisms] (X : D) :
contractibleTriangle X ∈ L.essImageDistTriang := by
refine ⟨contractibleTriangle (L.objPreimage X), ?_, contractible_distinguished _⟩
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/Localization/Triangulated.lean | 61 | 66 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Kexing Ying. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConvergenceInMeasure
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.L1Space.Integrable
/-!
# Uniform integrability
This file contains the definitions for uniform integrability (both in the measure theory sense
as well as the probability theory sense). This file also contains the Vitali convergence theorem
which establishes a relation between uniform integrability, convergence in measure and
Lp convergence.
Uniform integrability plays a vital role in the theory of martingales most notably is used to
formulate the martingale convergence theorem.
## Main definitions
* `MeasureTheory.UnifIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of functions `f` is uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there
exists some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` of smaller measure than `δ`, the Lp-norm of
`f i` restricted `s` is smaller than `ε` for all `i`.
* `MeasureTheory.UniformIntegrable`: uniform integrability in the probability theory sense.
In particular, a sequence of measurable functions `f` is uniformly integrable in the
probability theory sense if it is uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and
has uniformly bounded Lp-norm.
# Main results
* `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite`: a finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly
integrable.
* `MeasureTheory.tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae`: a sequence of Lp functions which is uniformly
integrable converges in Lp if they converge almost everywhere.
* `MeasureTheory.tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite`: Vitali convergence theorem:
a sequence of Lp functions converges in Lp if and only if it is uniformly integrable
and converges in measure.
## Tags
uniform integrable, uniformly absolutely continuous integral, Vitali convergence theorem
-/
noncomputable section
open scoped MeasureTheory NNReal ENNReal Topology
namespace MeasureTheory
open Set Filter TopologicalSpace
variable {α β ι : Type*} {m : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α} [NormedAddCommGroup β]
/-- Uniform integrability in the measure theory sense.
A sequence of functions `f` is said to be uniformly integrable if for all `ε > 0`, there exists
some `δ > 0` such that for all sets `s` with measure less than `δ`, the Lp-norm of `f i`
restricted on `s` is less than `ε`.
Uniform integrability is also known as uniformly absolutely continuous integrals. -/
def UnifIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
∀ ⦃ε : ℝ⦄ (_ : 0 < ε), ∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ i s,
MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε
/-- In probability theory, a family of measurable functions is uniformly integrable if it is
uniformly integrable in the measure theory sense and is uniformly bounded. -/
def UniformIntegrable {_ : MeasurableSpace α} (f : ι → α → β) (p : ℝ≥0∞) (μ : Measure α) : Prop :=
(∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ∧ ∃ C : ℝ≥0, ∀ i, eLpNorm (f i) p μ ≤ C
namespace UniformIntegrable
protected theorem aestronglyMeasurable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ)
(i : ι) : AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ :=
hf.1 i
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-09")]
alias aeStronglyMeasurable := UniformIntegrable.aestronglyMeasurable
protected theorem unifIntegrable {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ :=
hf.2.1
protected theorem memLp {f : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞} (hf : UniformIntegrable f p μ) (i : ι) :
MemLp (f i) p μ :=
⟨hf.1 i,
let ⟨_, _, hC⟩ := hf.2
lt_of_le_of_lt (hC i) ENNReal.coe_lt_top⟩
end UniformIntegrable
section UnifIntegrable
/-! ### `UnifIntegrable`
This section deals with uniform integrability in the measure theory sense. -/
namespace UnifIntegrable
variable {f g : ι → α → β} {p : ℝ≥0∞}
protected theorem add (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f + g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
have hε2 : 0 < ε / 2 := half_pos hε
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁_pos, hfδ₁⟩ := hf hε2
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂_pos, hgδ₂⟩ := hg hε2
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁_pos hδ₂_pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
simp_rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_add']
refine (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf_meas i).indicator hs) ((hg_meas i).indicator hs) hp).trans ?_
have hε_halves : ENNReal.ofReal ε = ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) + ENNReal.ofReal (ε / 2) := by
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_add hε2.le hε2.le, add_halves]
rw [hε_halves]
exact add_le_add (hfδ₁ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_left _ _))))
(hgδ₂ i s hs (hμs.trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (min_le_right _ _))))
protected theorem neg (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) : UnifIntegrable (-f) p μ := by
simp_rw [UnifIntegrable, Pi.neg_apply, Set.indicator_neg', eLpNorm_neg]
exact hf
protected theorem sub (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hg : UnifIntegrable g p μ) (hp : 1 ≤ p)
(hf_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (f i) μ) (hg_meas : ∀ i, AEStronglyMeasurable (g i) μ) :
UnifIntegrable (f - g) p μ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg]
exact hf.add hg.neg hp hf_meas fun i => (hg_meas i).neg
protected theorem ae_eq (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable g p μ := by
classical
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hfδ⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun n s hs hμs => (le_of_eq <| eLpNorm_congr_ae ?_).trans (hfδ n s hs hμs)⟩
filter_upwards [hfg n] with x hx
simp_rw [Set.indicator_apply, hx]
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the functions to a set. -/
protected theorem indicator (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable (fun i => E.indicator (f i)) p μ := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
calc
eLpNorm (s.indicator (E.indicator (f i))) p μ
= eLpNorm (E.indicator (s.indicator (f i))) p μ := by
simp only [indicator_indicator, inter_comm]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (s.indicator (f i)) p μ := eLpNorm_indicator_le _
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hε _ _ hs hμs
/-- Uniform integrability is preserved by restriction of the measure to a set. -/
protected theorem restrict (hf : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (E : Set α) :
UnifIntegrable f p (μ.restrict E) := fun ε hε ↦ by
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hδε⟩ := hf hε
refine ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun i s hs hμs ↦ ?_⟩
rw [μ.restrict_apply hs, ← measure_toMeasurable] at hμs
calc
eLpNorm (indicator s (f i)) p (μ.restrict E) = eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (s ∩ E)) := by
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, μ.restrict_restrict hs]
_ ≤ eLpNorm (f i) p (μ.restrict (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E))) :=
eLpNorm_mono_measure _ <| Measure.restrict_mono (subset_toMeasurable _ _) le_rfl
_ = eLpNorm (indicator (toMeasurable μ (s ∩ E)) (f i)) p μ :=
(eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _)).symm
_ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := hδε i _ (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _) hμs
end UnifIntegrable
theorem unifIntegrable_zero_meas [MeasurableSpace α] {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f : ι → α → β} :
UnifIntegrable f p (0 : Measure α) :=
fun ε _ => ⟨1, one_pos, fun i s _ _ => by simp⟩
theorem unifIntegrable_congr_ae {p : ℝ≥0∞} {f g : ι → α → β} (hfg : ∀ n, f n =ᵐ[μ] g n) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔ UnifIntegrable g p μ :=
⟨fun hf => hf.ae_eq hfg, fun hg => hg.ae_eq fun n => (hfg n).symm⟩
theorem tendsto_indicator_ge (f : α → β) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_atTop_of_eventually_const (i₀ := Nat.ceil (‖f x‖₊ : ℝ) + 1) fun n hn => ?_
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
simp only [not_le, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
refine lt_of_le_of_lt (Nat.le_ceil _) ?_
refine lt_of_lt_of_le (lt_add_one _) ?_
norm_cast
variable {p : ℝ≥0∞}
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- This lemma is weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
as the latter provides `0 ≤ M` and does not require the measurability of `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖₊ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have htendsto :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun M : ℕ => { x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
univ_mem' (id fun x => tendsto_indicator_ge f x)
have hmeas : ∀ M : ℕ, AEStronglyMeasurable ({ x | (M : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ := by
intro M
apply hf.1.indicator
apply StronglyMeasurable.measurableSet_le stronglyMeasurable_const
hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.coe_nnreal_real.stronglyMeasurable
have hbound : HasFiniteIntegral (fun x => ‖f x‖) μ := by
rw [memLp_one_iff_integrable] at hf
exact hf.norm.2
have : Tendsto (fun n : ℕ ↦ ∫⁻ a, ENNReal.ofReal ‖{ x | n ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f a - 0‖ ∂μ)
atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_lintegral_norm_of_dominated_convergence hmeas hbound ?_ htendsto
refine fun n => univ_mem' (id fun x => ?_)
by_cases hx : (n : ℝ) ≤ ‖f x‖
· dsimp
rwa [Set.indicator_of_mem]
· dsimp
rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem, norm_zero]
· exact norm_nonneg _
· assumption
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at this
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := this (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (ENNReal.ofReal_pos.2 hε)
simp only [zero_tsub, zero_le, sub_zero, zero_add, coe_nnnorm,
Set.mem_Icc] at hM
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
convert hM M le_rfl
simp only [coe_nnnorm, ENNReal.ofReal_eq_coe_nnreal (norm_nonneg _)]
rfl
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le`
which does not require measurability. -/
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas (hf : MemLp f 1 μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε :=
let ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.integral_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
⟨max M 0, le_max_right _ _, by simpa⟩
theorem MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le (hf : MemLp f 1 μ) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 ≤ M ∧ (∫⁻ x, ‖{ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f x‖ₑ ∂μ) ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hf_mk : MemLp (hf.1.mk f) 1 μ := (memLp_congr_ae hf.1.ae_eq_mk).mp hf
obtain ⟨M, hM_pos, hfM⟩ :=
hf_mk.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le_of_meas hf.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk hε
refine ⟨M, hM_pos, (le_of_eq ?_).trans hfM⟩
refine lintegral_congr_ae ?_
filter_upwards [hf.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx
simp only [Set.indicator_apply, coe_nnnorm, Set.mem_setOf_eq, ENNReal.coe_inj, hx.symm]
theorem MemLp.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero (hf : MemLp f ∞ μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) :
∃ M : ℝ, eLpNormEssSup ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) μ = 0 := by
have hbdd : eLpNormEssSup f μ < ∞ := hf.eLpNorm_lt_top
refine ⟨(eLpNorm f ∞ μ + 1).toReal, ?_⟩
rw [eLpNormEssSup_indicator_eq_eLpNormEssSup_restrict]
· have : μ.restrict { x : α | (eLpNorm f ⊤ μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖₊ } = 0 := by
simp only [coe_nnnorm, eLpNorm_exponent_top, Measure.restrict_eq_zero]
have : { x : α | (eLpNormEssSup f μ + 1).toReal ≤ ‖f x‖ } ⊆
{ x : α | eLpNormEssSup f μ < ‖f x‖₊ } := by
intro x hx
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq, ← ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne ENNReal.coe_lt_top.ne,
ENNReal.coe_toReal, coe_nnnorm]
refine lt_of_lt_of_le ?_ hx
rw [ENNReal.toReal_lt_toReal hbdd.ne]
· exact ENNReal.lt_add_right hbdd.ne one_ne_zero
· exact (ENNReal.add_lt_top.2 ⟨hbdd, ENNReal.one_lt_top⟩).ne
rw [← nonpos_iff_eq_zero]
refine (measure_mono this).trans ?_
have hle := enorm_ae_le_eLpNormEssSup f μ
simp_rw [ae_iff, not_le] at hle
exact nonpos_iff_eq_zero.2 hle
rw [this, eLpNormEssSup_measure_zero]
exact measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe
/- This lemma is slightly weaker than `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le` as the
latter provides `0 < M`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) : ∃ M : ℝ, eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hp_ne_zero : p = 0
· refine ⟨1, hp_ne_zero.symm ▸ ?_⟩
simp [eLpNorm_exponent_zero]
by_cases hp_ne_top : p = ∞
· subst hp_ne_top
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNormEssSup_indicator_norm_ge_eq_zero hmeas
refine ⟨M, ?_⟩
simp only [eLpNorm_exponent_top, hM, zero_le]
obtain ⟨M, hM', hM⟩ := MemLp.integral_indicator_norm_ge_nonneg_le
(μ := μ) (hf.norm_rpow hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top) (Real.rpow_pos_of_pos hε p.toReal)
refine ⟨M ^ (1 / p.toReal), ?_⟩
rw [eLpNorm_eq_lintegral_rpow_enorm hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top, ← ENNReal.rpow_one (ENNReal.ofReal ε)]
conv_rhs => rw [← mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm]
rw [ENNReal.rpow_mul,
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top),
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos hε]
convert hM using 3 with x
rw [enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm, enorm_indicator_eq_indicator_enorm]
have hiff : M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ ↔ M ≤ ‖‖f x‖ ^ p.toReal‖₊ := by
rw [coe_nnnorm, coe_nnnorm, Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _), norm_norm,
← Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff hM' (Real.rpow_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) _)
(one_div_pos.2 <| ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top), ← Real.rpow_mul (norm_nonneg _),
mul_one_div_cancel (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top).ne.symm, Real.rpow_one]
by_cases hx : x ∈ { x : α | M ^ (1 / p.toReal) ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem, Real.enorm_of_nonneg (by positivity),
← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) ENNReal.toReal_nonneg, ofReal_norm]
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
· rw [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_not_mem]
· simp [ENNReal.toReal_pos hp_ne_zero hp_ne_top]
· rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rwa [← hiff]
/-- This lemma implies that a single function is uniformly integrable (in the probability sense). -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le (hf : MemLp f p μ) (hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f)
{ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ M : ℝ, 0 < M ∧ eLpNorm ({ x | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_le hmeas hε
refine
⟨max M 1, lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one (le_max_right _ _), le_trans (eLpNorm_mono fun x => ?_) hM⟩
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm]
refine Set.indicator_le_indicator_of_subset (fun x hx => ?_) (fun x => norm_nonneg (f x)) x
rw [Set.mem_setOf_eq] at hx -- removing the `rw` breaks the proof!
exact (max_le_iff.1 hx).1
end
theorem eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound {f : α → β} (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) {M : ℝ}
(hf : ∀ x, ‖f x‖ < M) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s →
μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ → eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
by_cases hM : M ≤ 0
· refine ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun s _ _ => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = 0)]
· simp [hε.le]
· ext x
rw [Pi.zero_apply, ← norm_le_zero_iff]
exact (lt_of_lt_of_le (hf x) hM).le
rw [not_le] at hM
refine ⟨(ε / M) ^ p.toReal, Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (div_pos hε hM) _, fun s hs hμ => ?_⟩
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
have haebdd : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ.restrict s, ‖f x‖ ≤ M := by
filter_upwards
exact fun x => (hf x).le
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_le_of_ae_bound haebdd) ?_
rw [Measure.restrict_apply MeasurableSet.univ, Set.univ_inter,
← ENNReal.le_div_iff_mul_le (Or.inl _) (Or.inl ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top)]
· rw [ENNReal.rpow_inv_le_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top)]
refine le_trans hμ ?_
rw [← ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_pos (div_pos hε hM),
ENNReal.rpow_le_rpow_iff (ENNReal.toReal_pos hp hp_top), ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos hM]
· simpa only [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, not_le, Ne]
section
variable {f : α → β}
/-- Auxiliary lemma for `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le' (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ 2 * ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨M, hMpos, hM⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_norm_ge_pos_le hmeas hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ :=
eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_bound (f := { x | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f) hp_top hε (by
intro x
rw [norm_indicator_eq_indicator_norm, Set.indicator_apply]
· split_ifs with h
exacts [h, hMpos])
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
rw [(_ : f = { x : α | M ≤ ‖f x‖₊ }.indicator f + { x : α | ‖f x‖ < M }.indicator f)]
· rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le ?_ ?_ hp_one) ?_
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_le measurable_const hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe))
· exact StronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
(hmeas.indicator (measurableSet_lt hmeas.nnnorm.measurable.subtype_coe measurable_const))
· rw [two_mul]
refine add_le_add (le_trans (eLpNorm_mono_measure _ Measure.restrict_le_self) hM) ?_
rw [← eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact hδ s hs hμs
· ext x
by_cases hx : M ≤ ‖f x‖
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_mem, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, add_zero] <;> simpa
· rw [Pi.add_apply, Set.indicator_of_not_mem, Set.indicator_of_mem, zero_add] <;>
simpa using hx
/-- This lemma is superseded by `MeasureTheory.MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le` which does not require
measurability on `f`. -/
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ)
(hmeas : StronglyMeasurable f) {ε : ℝ} (hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := hf.eLpNorm_indicator_le' hp_one hp_top hmeas (half_pos hε)
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => le_trans (hδ s hs hμs) ?_⟩
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos zero_lt_two, (by norm_num : ENNReal.ofReal 2 = 2),
ENNReal.mul_div_cancel] <;>
norm_num
theorem MemLp.eLpNorm_indicator_le (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) (hf : MemLp f p μ) {ε : ℝ}
(hε : 0 < ε) :
∃ (δ : ℝ) (_ : 0 < δ), ∀ s, MeasurableSet s → μ s ≤ ENNReal.ofReal δ →
eLpNorm (s.indicator f) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal ε := by
have hℒp := hf
obtain ⟨⟨f', hf', heq⟩, _⟩ := hf
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hℒp.ae_eq heq).eLpNorm_indicator_le_of_meas hp_one hp_top hf' hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs using 1
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs, eLpNorm_indicator_eq_eLpNorm_restrict hs]
exact eLpNorm_congr_ae heq.restrict
/-- A constant function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_const {g : α → β} (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp_ne_top : p ≠ ∞) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
UnifIntegrable (fun _ : ι => g) p μ := by
intro ε hε
obtain ⟨δ, hδ_pos, hgδ⟩ := hg.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp_ne_top hε
exact ⟨δ, hδ_pos, fun _ => hgδ⟩
/-- A single function is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_subsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ι → α → β} (hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
by_cases hι : Nonempty ι
· obtain ⟨i⟩ := hι
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := (hf i).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun j s hs hμs => ?_⟩
convert hδ s hs hμs
· exact ⟨1, zero_lt_one, fun i => False.elim <| hι <| Nonempty.intro i⟩
/-- This lemma is less general than `MeasureTheory.unifIntegrable_finite` which applies to
all sequences indexed by a finite type. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_fin (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {n : ℕ} {f : Fin n → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
revert f
induction' n with n h
· intro f hf
exact unifIntegrable_subsingleton hp_one hp_top hf
intro f hfLp ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := fun k => f k
have hgLp : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun i => hfLp i
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁pos, hδ₁⟩ := h hgLp hε
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂pos, hδ₂⟩ := (hfLp n).eLpNorm_indicator_le hp_one hp_top hε
refine ⟨min δ₁ δ₂, lt_min hδ₁pos hδ₂pos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hi : i.val < n
· rw [(_ : f i = g ⟨i.val, hi⟩)]
· exact hδ₁ _ s hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_left _ _)
· simp [g]
· rw [(_ : i = n)]
· exact hδ₂ _ hs (le_trans hμs <| ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <| min_le_right _ _)
· have hi' := Fin.is_lt i
rw [Nat.lt_succ_iff] at hi'
rw [not_lt] at hi
simp [← le_antisymm hi' hi]
/-- A finite sequence of Lp functions is uniformly integrable. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_finite [Finite ι] (hp_one : 1 ≤ p) (hp_top : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
(hf : ∀ i, MemLp (f i) p μ) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Finite.exists_equiv_fin ι
intro ε hε
let g : Fin n → α → β := f ∘ hn.some.symm
have hg : ∀ i, MemLp (g i) p μ := fun _ => hf _
obtain ⟨δ, hδpos, hδ⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp_one hp_top hg hε
refine ⟨δ, hδpos, fun i s hs hμs => ?_⟩
specialize hδ (hn.some i) s hs hμs
simp_rw [g, Function.comp_apply, Equiv.symm_apply_apply] at hδ
assumption
end
theorem eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd (μ : Measure α)
{p : ℝ≥0∞} (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {s : Set α} (hs : MeasurableSet[m] s)
{f g : α → β} {c : ℝ} (hc : 0 ≤ c) (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, dist (f x) (g x) ≤ c) :
eLpNorm (s.indicator (f - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal c * μ s ^ (1 / p.toReal) := by
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
have : ∀ x, ‖s.indicator (f - g) x‖ ≤ ‖s.indicator (fun _ => c) x‖ := by
intro x
by_cases hx : x ∈ s
· rw [Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Set.indicator_of_mem hx, Pi.sub_apply, ← dist_eq_norm,
Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
exact hf x hx
· simp [Set.indicator_of_not_mem hx]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_mono this) ?_
rw [eLpNorm_indicator_const hs hp hp']
refine mul_le_mul_right' (le_of_eq ?_) _
rw [← ofReal_norm_eq_enorm, Real.norm_eq_abs, abs_of_nonneg hc]
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, StronglyMeasurable (f n)) (hg : StronglyMeasurable g)
(hg' : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero]
intro ε hε
by_cases h : ε < ∞; swap
· rw [not_lt, top_le_iff] at h
exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [h]⟩
by_cases hμ : μ = 0
· exact ⟨0, fun n _ => by simp [hμ]⟩
have hε' : 0 < ε.toReal / 3 := div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos hε.ne' h.ne) (by norm_num)
have hdivp : 0 ≤ 1 / p.toReal := by positivity
have hpow : 0 < measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal) :=
Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδ₁, heLpNorm₁⟩ := hui hε'
obtain ⟨δ₂, hδ₂, heLpNorm₂⟩ := hg'.eLpNorm_indicator_le hp hp' hε'
obtain ⟨t, htm, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := tendstoUniformlyOn_of_ae_tendsto' hf hg hfg (lt_min hδ₁ hδ₂)
rw [Metric.tendstoUniformlyOn_iff] at ht₂
specialize ht₂ (ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
(div_pos (ENNReal.toReal_pos (gt_iff_lt.1 hε).ne.symm h.ne) (mul_pos (by norm_num) hpow))
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.1 ht₂; clear ht₂
refine ⟨N, fun n hn => ?_⟩
rw [← t.indicator_self_add_compl (f n - g)]
refine le_trans (eLpNorm_add_le (((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(((hf n).sub hg).indicator htm.compl).aestronglyMeasurable hp) ?_
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, Set.indicator_add' t, Set.indicator_neg']
refine le_trans (add_le_add_right (eLpNorm_add_le ((hf n).indicator htm).aestronglyMeasurable
(hg.indicator htm).neg.aestronglyMeasurable hp) _) ?_
have hnf : eLpNorm (t.indicator (f n)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₁ n t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₁.le]
exact min_le_left _ _
have hng : eLpNorm (t.indicator g) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
refine heLpNorm₂ t htm (le_trans ht₁ ?_)
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal_iff hδ₂.le]
exact min_le_right _ _
have hlt : eLpNorm (tᶜ.indicator (f n - g)) p μ ≤ ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) := by
specialize hN n hn
have : 0 ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)) := by positivity
have := eLpNorm_sub_le_of_dist_bdd μ hp' htm.compl this fun x hx =>
(dist_comm (g x) (f n x) ▸ (hN x hx).le :
dist (f n x) (g x) ≤ ε.toReal / (3 * measureUnivNNReal μ ^ (1 / p.toReal)))
refine le_trans this ?_
rw [div_mul_eq_div_mul_one_div, ← ENNReal.ofReal_toReal (measure_lt_top μ tᶜ).ne,
ENNReal.ofReal_rpow_of_nonneg ENNReal.toReal_nonneg hdivp, ← ENNReal.ofReal_mul, mul_assoc]
· refine ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal (mul_le_of_le_one_right hε'.le ?_)
rw [mul_comm, mul_one_div, div_le_one]
· refine Real.rpow_le_rpow ENNReal.toReal_nonneg
(ENNReal.toReal_le_of_le_ofReal (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ).le ?_) hdivp
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, coe_measureUnivNNReal]
exact measure_mono (Set.subset_univ _)
· exact Real.rpow_pos_of_pos (measureUnivNNReal_pos hμ) _
· positivity
have : ENNReal.ofReal (ε.toReal / 3) = ε / 3 := by
rw [ENNReal.ofReal_div_of_pos (show (0 : ℝ) < 3 by norm_num), ENNReal.ofReal_toReal h.ne]
simp
rw [this] at hnf hng hlt
rw [eLpNorm_neg, ← ENNReal.add_thirds ε, ← sub_eq_add_neg]
exact add_le_add_three hnf hng hlt
/-- A sequence of uniformly integrable functions which converges μ-a.e. converges in Lp. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
{f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β} (hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ)
(hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ) (hfg : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, Tendsto (fun n => f n x) atTop (𝓝 (g x))) :
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
have : ∀ n, eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ = eLpNorm ((hf n).mk (f n) - hg.1.mk g) p μ :=
fun n => eLpNorm_congr_ae ((hf n).ae_eq_mk.sub hg.1.ae_eq_mk)
simp_rw [this]
refine tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae_of_meas hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).stronglyMeasurable_mk)
hg.1.stronglyMeasurable_mk (hg.ae_eq hg.1.ae_eq_mk) (hui.ae_eq fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk) ?_
have h_ae_forall_eq : ∀ᵐ x ∂μ, ∀ n, f n x = (hf n).mk (f n) x := by
rw [ae_all_iff]
exact fun n => (hf n).ae_eq_mk
filter_upwards [hfg, h_ae_forall_eq, hg.1.ae_eq_mk] with x hx_tendsto hxf_eq hxg_eq
rw [← hxg_eq]
convert hx_tendsto using 1
ext1 n
exact (hxf_eq n).symm
variable {f : ℕ → α → β} {g : α → β}
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hf_tendsto : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) : UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
intro ε hε
rw [ENNReal.tendsto_atTop_zero] at hf_tendsto
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := hf_tendsto (ENNReal.ofReal ε) (by simpa)
let F : Fin N → α → β := fun n => f n
have hF : ∀ n, MemLp (F n) p μ := fun n => hf n
obtain ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, hδ₁⟩ := unifIntegrable_fin hp hp' hF hε
refine ⟨δ₁, hδpos₁, fun n s hs hμs => ?_⟩
by_cases hn : n < N
· exact hδ₁ ⟨n, hn⟩ s hs hμs
· exact (eLpNorm_indicator_le _).trans (hN n (not_lt.1 hn))
/-- Convergence in Lp implies uniform integrability. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ)
(hg : MemLp g p μ) (hfg : Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0)) :
UnifIntegrable f p μ := by
have : f = (fun _ => g) + fun n => f n - g := by ext1 n; simp
rw [this]
refine UnifIntegrable.add ?_ ?_ hp (fun _ => hg.aestronglyMeasurable)
fun n => (hf n).1.sub hg.aestronglyMeasurable
· exact unifIntegrable_const hp hp' hg
· exact unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp_zero hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).sub hg) hfg
/-- Forward direction of Vitali's convergence theorem: if `f` is a sequence of uniformly integrable
functions that converge in measure to some function `g` in a finite measure space, then `f`
converge in Lp to `g`. -/
theorem tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
(hf : ∀ n, AEStronglyMeasurable (f n) μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) (hui : UnifIntegrable f p μ)
(hfg : TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g) : Tendsto (fun n ↦ eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) := by
refine tendsto_of_subseq_tendsto fun ns hns => ?_
obtain ⟨ms, _, hms'⟩ := TendstoInMeasure.exists_seq_tendsto_ae fun ε hε => (hfg ε hε).comp hns
exact ⟨ms,
tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendsto_ae hp hp' (fun _ => hf _) hg (fun ε hε =>
let ⟨δ, hδ, hδ'⟩ := hui hε
⟨δ, hδ, fun i s hs hμs => hδ' _ s hs hμs⟩)
hms'⟩
/-- **Vitali's convergence theorem**: A sequence of functions `f` converges to `g` in Lp if and
only if it is uniformly integrable and converges to `g` in measure. -/
theorem tendstoInMeasure_iff_tendsto_Lp_finite [IsFiniteMeasure μ] (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞)
| (hf : ∀ n, MemLp (f n) p μ) (hg : MemLp g p μ) :
TendstoInMeasure μ f atTop g ∧ UnifIntegrable f p μ ↔
Tendsto (fun n => eLpNorm (f n - g) p μ) atTop (𝓝 0) :=
⟨fun h => tendsto_Lp_finite_of_tendstoInMeasure hp hp' (fun n => (hf n).1) hg h.2 h.1, fun h =>
⟨tendstoInMeasure_of_tendsto_eLpNorm (lt_of_lt_of_le zero_lt_one hp).ne.symm
(fun n => (hf n).aestronglyMeasurable) hg.aestronglyMeasurable h,
unifIntegrable_of_tendsto_Lp hp hp' hf hg h⟩⟩
/-- This lemma is superseded by `unifIntegrable_of` which do not require `C` to be positive. -/
theorem unifIntegrable_of' (hp : 1 ≤ p) (hp' : p ≠ ∞) {f : ι → α → β}
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/UniformIntegrable.lean | 608 | 617 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.SubboxInduction
import Mathlib.Analysis.BoxIntegral.Partition.Split
/-!
# Filters used in box-based integrals
First we define a structure `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`. This structure will be used as an
argument in the definition of `BoxIntegral.integral` in order to use the same definition for a few
well-known definitions of integrals based on partitions of a rectangular box into subboxes (Riemann
integral, Henstock-Kurzweil integral, and McShane integral).
This structure holds three boolean values (see below), and encodes eight different sets of
parameters; only four of these values are used somewhere in `mathlib4`. Three of them correspond to
the integration theories listed above, and one is a generalization of the one-dimensional
Henstock-Kurzweil integral such that the divergence theorem works without additional integrability
assumptions.
Finally, for each set of parameters `l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` and a rectangular box
`I : BoxIntegral.Box ι`, we define several `Filter`s that will be used either in the definition of
the corresponding integral, or in the proofs of its properties. We equip
`BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` with a `BoundedOrder` structure such that larger
`IntegrationParams` produce larger filters.
## Main definitions
### Integration parameters
The structure `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` has 3 boolean fields with the following meaning:
* `bRiemann`: the value `true` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e.
in the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes
of a tagged partition; the value `false` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the
tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `true` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box;
the value `false` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `true` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the
same box of a partition. Presence of this case make quite a few proofs harder but we can prove the
divergence theorem only for the filter `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥ =
{bRiemann := false, bHenstock := true, bDistortion := true}`.
### Well-known sets of parameters
Out of eight possible values of `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams`, the following four are used in
the library.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.Riemann` (`bRiemann = true`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the Riemann integral; in the corresponding
filter, we require that the diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are bounded from
above by a constant upper estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each tag
belongs to the corresponding closed box.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.Henstock` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the most natural generalization of
Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension; the only (but important!) difference between this
theory and Riemann integral is that instead of a constant upper estimate on the size of all boxes
of a partition, we require that the partition is *subordinate* to a possibly discontinuous
function `r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`, i.e. each box `J` is included in a closed ball with
center `π.tag J` and radius `r J`.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.McShane` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = false`,
`bDistortion = false`): this value corresponds to the McShane integral; the only difference with
the Henstock integral is that we allow tags to be outside of their boxes; the tags still have to
be in the ambient closed box, and the partition still has to be subordinate to a function.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥` (`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`,
`bDistortion = true`): this is the least integration theory in our list, i.e., all functions
integrable in any other theory is integrable in this one as well. This is a non-standard
generalization of the Henstock-Kurzweil integral to higher dimension. In dimension one, it
generates the same filter as `Henstock`. In higher dimension, this generalization defines an
integration theory such that the divergence of any Fréchet differentiable function `f` is
integrable, and its integral is equal to the sum of integrals of `f` over the faces of the box,
taken with appropriate signs.
A function `f` is `GP`-integrable if for any `ε > 0` and `c : ℝ≥0` there exists
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}` such that for any tagged partition `π` subordinate to `r`, if each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box and for each box `J ∈ π`, the maximal ratio of its
sides is less than or equal to `c`, then the integral sum of `f` over `π` is `ε`-close to the
integral.
### Filters and predicates on `TaggedPrepartition I`
For each value of `IntegrationParams` and a rectangular box `I`, we define a few filters on
`TaggedPrepartition I`. First, we define a predicate
```
structure BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet (l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams)
(I : BoxIntegral.Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ))
(π : BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I) : Prop where
```
This predicate says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.iUnion`.
The last condition is always true for `c > 1`, see TODO section for more details.
Then we define a predicate `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond` on functions
`r : (ι → ℝ) → {x : ℝ | 0 < x}`. If `l.bRiemann`, then this predicate requires `r` to be a constant
function, otherwise it imposes no restrictions on `r`. We introduce this definition to prove a few
dot-notation lemmas: e.g., `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond.min` says that the pointwise
minimum of two functions that satisfy this condition satisfies this condition as well.
Then we define four filters on `BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I`.
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilterDistortion`: an auxiliary filter that takes parameters
`(l : BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams) (I : BoxIntegral.Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)` and returns the
filter generated by all sets `{π | MemBaseSet l I c r π}`, where `r` is a function satisfying
the predicate `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.RCond l`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilter l I`: the supremum of `l.toFilterDistortion I c`
over all `c : ℝ≥0`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilterDistortioniUnion l I c π₀`, where `π₀` is a
prepartition of `I`: the infimum of `l.toFilterDistortion I c` and the principal filter
generated by `{π | π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion}`;
* `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I π₀`: the supremum of
`l.toFilterDistortioniUnion l I c π₀` over all `c : ℝ≥0`. This is the filter (in the case
`π₀ = ⊤` is the one-box partition of `I`) used in the definition of the integral of a function
over a box.
## Implementation details
* Later we define the integral of a function over a rectangular box as the limit (if it exists) of
the integral sums along `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I ⊤`. While it is
possible to define the integral with a general filter on `BoxIntegral.TaggedPrepartition I` as a
parameter, many lemmas (e.g., Sacks-Henstock lemma and most results about integrability of
functions) require the filter to have a predictable structure. So, instead of adding assumptions
about the filter here and there, we define this auxiliary type that can encode all integration
theories we need in practice.
* While the definition of the integral only uses the filter
`BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.toFilteriUnion l I ⊤` and partitions of a box, some lemmas
(e.g., the Henstock-Sacks lemmas) are best formulated in terms of the predicate `MemBaseSet` and
other filters defined above.
* We use `Bool` instead of `Prop` for the fields of `IntegrationParams` in order to have decidable
equality and inequalities.
## TODO
Currently, `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.MemBaseSet` explicitly requires that there exists a
partition of the complement `I \ π.iUnion` with distortion `≤ c`. For `c > 1`, this condition is
always true but the proof of this fact requires more API about
`BoxIntegral.Prepartition.splitMany`. We should formalize this fact, then either require `c > 1`
everywhere, or replace `≤ c` with `< c` so that we automatically get `c > 1` for a non-trivial
prepartition (and consider the special case `π = ⊥` separately if needed).
## Tags
integral, rectangular box, partition, filter
-/
open Set Function Filter Metric Finset Bool
open scoped Topology Filter NNReal
noncomputable section
namespace BoxIntegral
variable {ι : Type*} [Fintype ι] {I J : Box ι} {c c₁ c₂ : ℝ≥0}
open TaggedPrepartition
/-- An `IntegrationParams` is a structure holding 3 boolean values used to define a filter to be
used in the definition of a box-integrable function.
* `bRiemann`: the value `true` means that the filter corresponds to a Riemann-style integral, i.e.
in the definition of integrability we require a constant upper estimate `r` on the size of boxes
of a tagged partition; the value `false` means that the estimate may depend on the position of the
tag.
* `bHenstock`: the value `true` means that we require that each tag belongs to its own closed box;
the value `false` means that we only require that tags belong to the ambient box.
* `bDistortion`: the value `true` means that `r` can depend on the maximal ratio of sides of the
same box of a partition. Presence of this case makes quite a few proofs harder but we can prove
the divergence theorem only for the filter `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥ =
{bRiemann := false, bHenstock := true, bDistortion := true}`.
-/
@[ext]
structure IntegrationParams : Type where
(bRiemann bHenstock bDistortion : Bool)
variable {l l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams}
namespace IntegrationParams
/-- Auxiliary equivalence with a product type used to lift an order. -/
def equivProd : IntegrationParams ≃ Bool × Boolᵒᵈ × Boolᵒᵈ where
toFun l := ⟨l.1, OrderDual.toDual l.2, OrderDual.toDual l.3⟩
invFun l := ⟨l.1, OrderDual.ofDual l.2.1, OrderDual.ofDual l.2.2⟩
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := rfl
instance : PartialOrder IntegrationParams :=
PartialOrder.lift equivProd equivProd.injective
/-- Auxiliary `OrderIso` with a product type used to lift a `BoundedOrder` structure. -/
def isoProd : IntegrationParams ≃o Bool × Boolᵒᵈ × Boolᵒᵈ :=
⟨equivProd, Iff.rfl⟩
instance : BoundedOrder IntegrationParams :=
isoProd.symm.toGaloisInsertion.liftBoundedOrder
/-- The value `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams.GP = ⊥`
(`bRiemann = false`, `bHenstock = true`, `bDistortion = true`)
corresponds to a generalization of the Henstock integral such that the Divergence theorem holds true
without additional integrability assumptions, see the module docstring for details. -/
instance : Inhabited IntegrationParams :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance : DecidableLE (IntegrationParams) :=
fun _ _ => inferInstanceAs (Decidable (_ ∧ _))
instance : DecidableEq IntegrationParams :=
fun _ _ => decidable_of_iff _ IntegrationParams.ext_iff.symm
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the Riemann integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the diameters of all boxes `J` of a tagged partition are
bounded from above by a constant upper estimate that may not depend on the geometry of `J`, and each
tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Riemann : IntegrationParams where
bRiemann := true
bHenstock := true
bDistortion := false
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. -/
def Henstock : IntegrationParams :=
⟨false, true, false⟩
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the McShane integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r`; the tags may be outside of the corresponding closed box
(but still inside the ambient closed box `I.Icc`). -/
def McShane : IntegrationParams :=
⟨false, false, false⟩
/-- The `BoxIntegral.IntegrationParams` corresponding to the generalized Perron integral. In the
corresponding filter, we require that the tagged partition is subordinate to a (possibly,
discontinuous) positive function `r` and each tag belongs to the corresponding closed box. We also
require an upper estimate on the distortion of all boxes of the partition. -/
def GP : IntegrationParams := ⊥
theorem henstock_le_riemann : Henstock ≤ Riemann := by trivial
theorem henstock_le_mcShane : Henstock ≤ McShane := by trivial
theorem gp_le : GP ≤ l :=
bot_le
/-- The predicate corresponding to a base set of the filter defined by an
`IntegrationParams`. It says that
* if `l.bHenstock`, then `π` is a Henstock prepartition, i.e. each tag belongs to the corresponding
closed box;
* `π` is subordinate to `r`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then the distortion of each box in `π` is less than or equal to `c`;
* if `l.bDistortion`, then there exists a prepartition `π'` with distortion `≤ c` that covers
exactly `I \ π.iUnion`.
The last condition is automatically verified for partitions, and is used in the proof of the
Sacks-Henstock inequality to compare two prepartitions covering the same part of the box.
It is also automatically satisfied for any `c > 1`, see TODO section of the module docstring for
details. -/
structure MemBaseSet (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ))
(π : TaggedPrepartition I) : Prop where
protected isSubordinate : π.IsSubordinate r
protected isHenstock : l.bHenstock → π.IsHenstock
protected distortion_le : l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c
protected exists_compl : l.bDistortion → ∃ π' : Prepartition I,
π'.iUnion = ↑I \ π.iUnion ∧ π'.distortion ≤ c
/-- A predicate saying that in case `l.bRiemann = true`, the function `r` is a constant. -/
def RCond {ι : Type*} (l : IntegrationParams) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : Prop :=
l.bRiemann → ∀ x, r x = r 0
/-- A set `s : Set (TaggedPrepartition I)` belongs to `l.toFilterDistortion I c` if there exists
a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = true`) such that `s` contains each
prepartition `π` such that `l.MemBaseSet I c r π`. -/
def toFilterDistortion (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) :
Filter (TaggedPrepartition I) :=
⨅ (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) (_ : l.RCond r), 𝓟 { π | l.MemBaseSet I c r π }
/-- A set `s : Set (TaggedPrepartition I)` belongs to `l.toFilter I` if for any `c : ℝ≥0` there
exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = true`) such that
`s` contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.MemBaseSet I c r π`. -/
def toFilter (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) : Filter (TaggedPrepartition I) :=
⨆ c : ℝ≥0, l.toFilterDistortion I c
/-- A set `s : Set (TaggedPrepartition I)` belongs to `l.toFilterDistortioniUnion I c π₀` if
there exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = true`) such that `s`
contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.MemBaseSet I c r π` and `π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion`. -/
def toFilterDistortioniUnion (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :=
l.toFilterDistortion I c ⊓ 𝓟 { π | π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion }
/-- A set `s : Set (TaggedPrepartition I)` belongs to `l.toFilteriUnion I π₀` if for any `c : ℝ≥0`
there exists a function `r : ℝⁿ → (0, ∞)` (or a constant `r` if `l.bRiemann = true`) such that `s`
contains each prepartition `π` such that `l.MemBaseSet I c r π` and `π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion`. -/
def toFilteriUnion (I : Box ι) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :=
⨆ c : ℝ≥0, l.toFilterDistortioniUnion I c π₀
theorem rCond_of_bRiemann_eq_false {ι} (l : IntegrationParams) (hl : l.bRiemann = false)
{r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} : l.RCond r := by
simp [RCond, hl]
theorem toFilter_inf_iUnion_eq (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :
l.toFilter I ⊓ 𝓟 { π | π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion } = l.toFilteriUnion I π₀ :=
(iSup_inf_principal _ _).symm
variable {r₁ r₂ : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} {π π₁ π₂ : TaggedPrepartition I}
variable (I) in
theorem MemBaseSet.mono' (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂)
(hr : ∀ J ∈ π, r₁ (π.tag J) ≤ r₂ (π.tag J)) (hπ : l₁.MemBaseSet I c₁ r₁ π) :
l₂.MemBaseSet I c₂ r₂ π :=
⟨hπ.1.mono' hr, fun h₂ => hπ.2 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.1 h₂),
fun hD => (hπ.3 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.2 hD)).trans hc,
fun hD => (hπ.4 (le_iff_imp.1 h.2.2 hD)).imp fun _ hπ => ⟨hπ.1, hπ.2.trans hc⟩⟩
variable (I) in
@[mono]
theorem MemBaseSet.mono (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂)
(hr : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, r₁ x ≤ r₂ x) (hπ : l₁.MemBaseSet I c₁ r₁ π) : l₂.MemBaseSet I c₂ r₂ π :=
hπ.mono' I h hc fun J _ => hr _ <| π.tag_mem_Icc J
theorem MemBaseSet.exists_common_compl
(h₁ : l.MemBaseSet I c₁ r₁ π₁) (h₂ : l.MemBaseSet I c₂ r₂ π₂)
(hU : π₁.iUnion = π₂.iUnion) :
∃ π : Prepartition I, π.iUnion = ↑I \ π₁.iUnion ∧
(l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c₁) ∧ (l.bDistortion → π.distortion ≤ c₂) := by
wlog hc : c₁ ≤ c₂ with H
· simpa [hU, _root_.and_comm] using
@H _ _ I c₂ c₁ l r₂ r₁ π₂ π₁ h₂ h₁ hU.symm (le_of_not_le hc)
by_cases hD : (l.bDistortion : Prop)
· rcases h₁.4 hD with ⟨π, hπU, hπc⟩
exact ⟨π, hπU, fun _ => hπc, fun _ => hπc.trans hc⟩
· exact ⟨π₁.toPrepartition.compl, π₁.toPrepartition.iUnion_compl,
fun h => (hD h).elim, fun h => (hD h).elim⟩
protected theorem MemBaseSet.unionComplToSubordinate (hπ₁ : l.MemBaseSet I c r₁ π₁)
(hle : ∀ x ∈ Box.Icc I, r₂ x ≤ r₁ x) {π₂ : Prepartition I} (hU : π₂.iUnion = ↑I \ π₁.iUnion)
(hc : l.bDistortion → π₂.distortion ≤ c) :
l.MemBaseSet I c r₁ (π₁.unionComplToSubordinate π₂ hU r₂) :=
⟨hπ₁.1.disjUnion ((π₂.isSubordinate_toSubordinate r₂).mono hle) _,
fun h => (hπ₁.2 h).disjUnion (π₂.isHenstock_toSubordinate _) _,
fun h => (distortion_unionComplToSubordinate _ _ _ _).trans_le (max_le (hπ₁.3 h) (hc h)),
fun _ => ⟨⊥, by simp⟩⟩
variable {r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)}
protected theorem MemBaseSet.filter (hπ : l.MemBaseSet I c r π) (p : Box ι → Prop) :
l.MemBaseSet I c r (π.filter p) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun J hJ => hπ.1 J (π.mem_filter.1 hJ).1, fun hH J hJ => hπ.2 hH J (π.mem_filter.1 hJ).1,
fun hD => (distortion_filter_le _ _).trans (hπ.3 hD), fun hD => ?_⟩
rcases hπ.4 hD with ⟨π₁, hπ₁U, hc⟩
set π₂ := π.filter fun J => ¬p J
have : Disjoint π₁.iUnion π₂.iUnion := by
simpa [π₂, hπ₁U] using disjoint_sdiff_self_left.mono_right sdiff_le
refine ⟨π₁.disjUnion π₂.toPrepartition this, ?_, ?_⟩
· suffices ↑I \ π.iUnion ∪ π.iUnion \ (π.filter p).iUnion = ↑I \ (π.filter p).iUnion by
simp [π₂, *]
have h : (π.filter p).iUnion ⊆ π.iUnion :=
biUnion_subset_biUnion_left (Finset.filter_subset _ _)
ext x
fconstructor
· rintro (⟨hxI, hxπ⟩ | ⟨hxπ, hxp⟩)
exacts [⟨hxI, mt (@h x) hxπ⟩, ⟨π.iUnion_subset hxπ, hxp⟩]
· rintro ⟨hxI, hxp⟩
by_cases hxπ : x ∈ π.iUnion
exacts [Or.inr ⟨hxπ, hxp⟩, Or.inl ⟨hxI, hxπ⟩]
· have : (π.filter fun J => ¬p J).distortion ≤ c := (distortion_filter_le _ _).trans (hπ.3 hD)
simpa [hc]
theorem biUnionTagged_memBaseSet {π : Prepartition I} {πi : ∀ J, TaggedPrepartition J}
(h : ∀ J ∈ π, l.MemBaseSet J c r (πi J)) (hp : ∀ J ∈ π, (πi J).IsPartition)
(hc : l.bDistortion → π.compl.distortion ≤ c) : l.MemBaseSet I c r (π.biUnionTagged πi) := by
refine ⟨TaggedPrepartition.isSubordinate_biUnionTagged.2 fun J hJ => (h J hJ).1,
fun hH => TaggedPrepartition.isHenstock_biUnionTagged.2 fun J hJ => (h J hJ).2 hH,
fun hD => ?_, fun hD => ?_⟩
· rw [Prepartition.distortion_biUnionTagged, Finset.sup_le_iff]
exact fun J hJ => (h J hJ).3 hD
· refine ⟨_, ?_, hc hD⟩
rw [π.iUnion_compl, ← π.iUnion_biUnion_partition hp]
rfl
@[mono]
theorem RCond.mono {ι : Type*} {r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hr : l₂.RCond r) :
l₁.RCond r :=
fun hR => hr (le_iff_imp.1 h.1 hR)
nonrec theorem RCond.min {ι : Type*} {r₁ r₂ : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)} (h₁ : l.RCond r₁)
(h₂ : l.RCond r₂) : l.RCond fun x => min (r₁ x) (r₂ x) :=
fun hR x => congr_arg₂ min (h₁ hR x) (h₂ hR x)
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem toFilterDistortion_mono (I : Box ι) (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) (hc : c₁ ≤ c₂) :
l₁.toFilterDistortion I c₁ ≤ l₂.toFilterDistortion I c₂ :=
iInf_mono fun _ =>
iInf_mono' fun hr =>
⟨hr.mono h, principal_mono.2 fun _ => MemBaseSet.mono I h hc fun _ _ => le_rfl⟩
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem toFilter_mono (I : Box ι) {l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂) :
l₁.toFilter I ≤ l₂.toFilter I :=
iSup_mono fun _ => toFilterDistortion_mono I h le_rfl
@[gcongr, mono]
theorem toFilteriUnion_mono (I : Box ι) {l₁ l₂ : IntegrationParams} (h : l₁ ≤ l₂)
(π₀ : Prepartition I) : l₁.toFilteriUnion I π₀ ≤ l₂.toFilteriUnion I π₀ :=
iSup_mono fun _ => inf_le_inf_right _ <| toFilterDistortion_mono _ h le_rfl
theorem toFilteriUnion_congr (I : Box ι) (l : IntegrationParams) {π₁ π₂ : Prepartition I}
(h : π₁.iUnion = π₂.iUnion) : l.toFilteriUnion I π₁ = l.toFilteriUnion I π₂ := by
simp only [toFilteriUnion, toFilterDistortioniUnion, h]
theorem hasBasis_toFilterDistortion (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0) :
(l.toFilterDistortion I c).HasBasis l.RCond fun r => { π | l.MemBaseSet I c r π } :=
hasBasis_biInf_principal'
(fun _ hr₁ _ hr₂ =>
⟨_, hr₁.min hr₂, fun _ => MemBaseSet.mono _ le_rfl le_rfl fun _ _ => min_le_left _ _,
fun _ => MemBaseSet.mono _ le_rfl le_rfl fun _ _ => min_le_right _ _⟩)
⟨fun _ => ⟨1, Set.mem_Ioi.2 zero_lt_one⟩, fun _ _ => rfl⟩
theorem hasBasis_toFilterDistortioniUnion (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (c : ℝ≥0)
(π₀ : Prepartition I) :
(l.toFilterDistortioniUnion I c π₀).HasBasis l.RCond fun r =>
{ π | l.MemBaseSet I c r π ∧ π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion } :=
(l.hasBasis_toFilterDistortion I c).inf_principal _
theorem hasBasis_toFilteriUnion (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (π₀ : Prepartition I) :
(l.toFilteriUnion I π₀).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ) => ∀ c, l.RCond (r c))
fun r => { π | ∃ c, l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π ∧ π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion } := by
have := fun c => l.hasBasis_toFilterDistortioniUnion I c π₀
simpa only [setOf_and, setOf_exists] using hasBasis_iSup this
theorem hasBasis_toFilteriUnion_top (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) :
(l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ) => ∀ c, l.RCond (r c))
fun r => { π | ∃ c, l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π ∧ π.IsPartition } := by
simpa only [TaggedPrepartition.isPartition_iff_iUnion_eq, Prepartition.iUnion_top] using
l.hasBasis_toFilteriUnion I ⊤
theorem hasBasis_toFilter (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) :
(l.toFilter I).HasBasis (fun r : ℝ≥0 → (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ) => ∀ c, l.RCond (r c))
fun r => { π | ∃ c, l.MemBaseSet I c (r c) π } := by
simpa only [setOf_exists] using hasBasis_iSup (l.hasBasis_toFilterDistortion I)
theorem tendsto_embedBox_toFilteriUnion_top (l : IntegrationParams) (h : I ≤ J) :
Tendsto (TaggedPrepartition.embedBox I J h) (l.toFilteriUnion I ⊤)
(l.toFilteriUnion J (Prepartition.single J I h)) := by
simp only [toFilteriUnion, tendsto_iSup]; intro c
set π₀ := Prepartition.single J I h
refine le_iSup_of_le (max c π₀.compl.distortion) ?_
refine ((l.hasBasis_toFilterDistortioniUnion I c ⊤).tendsto_iff
(l.hasBasis_toFilterDistortioniUnion J _ _)).2 fun r hr => ?_
refine ⟨r, hr, fun π hπ => ?_⟩
rw [mem_setOf_eq, Prepartition.iUnion_top] at hπ
refine ⟨⟨hπ.1.1, hπ.1.2, fun hD => le_trans (hπ.1.3 hD) (le_max_left _ _), fun _ => ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· refine ⟨_, π₀.iUnion_compl.trans ?_, le_max_right _ _⟩
congr 1
exact (Prepartition.iUnion_single h).trans hπ.2.symm
· exact hπ.2.trans (Prepartition.iUnion_single _).symm
theorem exists_memBaseSet_le_iUnion_eq (l : IntegrationParams) (π₀ : Prepartition I)
(hc₁ : π₀.distortion ≤ c) (hc₂ : π₀.compl.distortion ≤ c) (r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) :
∃ π, l.MemBaseSet I c r π ∧ π.toPrepartition ≤ π₀ ∧ π.iUnion = π₀.iUnion := by
rcases π₀.exists_tagged_le_isHenstock_isSubordinate_iUnion_eq r with ⟨π, hle, hH, hr, hd, hU⟩
refine ⟨π, ⟨hr, fun _ => hH, fun _ => hd.trans_le hc₁, fun _ => ⟨π₀.compl, ?_, hc₂⟩⟩, ⟨hle, hU⟩⟩
| exact Prepartition.compl_congr hU ▸ π.toPrepartition.iUnion_compl
theorem exists_memBaseSet_isPartition (l : IntegrationParams) (I : Box ι) (hc : I.distortion ≤ c)
(r : (ι → ℝ) → Ioi (0 : ℝ)) : ∃ π, l.MemBaseSet I c r π ∧ π.IsPartition := by
rw [← Prepartition.distortion_top] at hc
| Mathlib/Analysis/BoxIntegral/Partition/Filter.lean | 485 | 489 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Dirac
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.InfiniteSum.ENNReal
/-!
# Counting measure
In this file we define the counting measure `MeasurTheory.Measure.count`
as `MeasureTheory.Measure.sum MeasureTheory.Measure.dirac`
and prove basic properties of this measure.
-/
open Set
open scoped ENNReal Finset
variable {α β : Type*} [MeasurableSpace α] [MeasurableSpace β] {s : Set α}
noncomputable section
namespace MeasureTheory.Measure
/-- Counting measure on any measurable space. -/
def count : Measure α :=
sum dirac
@[simp] lemma count_ne_zero'' [Nonempty α] : (count : Measure α) ≠ 0 := by simp [count]
theorem le_count_apply : ∑' _ : s, (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ count s :=
calc
(∑' _ : s, 1 : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑' i, indicator s 1 i := tsum_subtype s 1
_ ≤ ∑' i, dirac i s := ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun _ => le_dirac_apply
_ ≤ count s := le_sum_apply _ _
theorem count_apply (hs : MeasurableSet s) : count s = s.encard := by
simp [count, hs, ← tsum_subtype, Set.encard]
@[deprecated measure_empty (since := "2025-02-06")]
theorem count_empty : count (∅ : Set α) = 0 := measure_empty
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset' {s : Finset α} (hs : MeasurableSet (s : Set α)) :
count (↑s : Set α) = #s := by simp [count_apply hs]
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_finset [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Finset α) :
count (↑s : Set α) = #s :=
count_apply_finset' s.measurableSet
theorem count_apply_finite' {s : Set α} (s_fin : s.Finite) (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) :
count s = #s_fin.toFinset := by
simp [←
@count_apply_finset' _ _ s_fin.toFinset (by simpa only [Finite.coe_toFinset] using s_mble)]
theorem count_apply_finite [MeasurableSingletonClass α] (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite) :
count s = #hs.toFinset := by rw [← count_apply_finset, Finite.coe_toFinset]
/-- `count` measure evaluates to infinity at infinite sets. -/
theorem count_apply_infinite (hs : s.Infinite) : count s = ∞ := by
refine top_unique (le_of_tendsto' ENNReal.tendsto_nat_nhds_top fun n => ?_)
rcases hs.exists_subset_card_eq n with ⟨t, ht, rfl⟩
calc
(#t : ℝ≥0∞) = ∑ i ∈ t, 1 := by simp
_ = ∑' i : (t : Set α), 1 := (t.tsum_subtype 1).symm
_ ≤ count (t : Set α) := le_count_apply
_ ≤ count s := measure_mono ht
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_eq_top' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s = ∞ ↔ s.Infinite := by
by_cases hs : s.Finite
· simp [Set.Infinite, hs, count_apply_finite' hs s_mble]
· change s.Infinite at hs
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite]
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_eq_top [MeasurableSingletonClass α] : count s = ∞ ↔ s.Infinite := by
by_cases hs : s.Finite
· exact count_apply_eq_top' hs.measurableSet
| · change s.Infinite at hs
simp [hs, count_apply_infinite]
@[simp]
theorem count_apply_lt_top' (s_mble : MeasurableSet s) : count s < ∞ ↔ s.Finite :=
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Count.lean | 82 | 86 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Chris Birkbeck. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Birkbeck
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Subgroup.Pointwise
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Basic
/-!
# Double cosets
This file defines double cosets for two subgroups `H K` of a group `G` and the quotient of `G` by
the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K`. We also prove that `G` can be written as a disjoint
union of the double cosets and that if one of `H` or `K` is the trivial group (i.e. `⊥` ) then
this is the usual left or right quotient of a group by a subgroup.
## Main definitions
* `rel`: The double coset relation defined by two subgroups `H K` of `G`.
* `Doset.quotient`: The quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e, `H \ G / K`.
-/
assert_not_exists MonoidWithZero
variable {G : Type*} [Group G] {α : Type*} [Mul α]
open MulOpposite
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Doset
/-- The double coset as an element of `Set α` corresponding to `s a t` -/
def doset (a : α) (s t : Set α) : Set α :=
s * {a} * t
lemma doset_eq_image2 (a : α) (s t : Set α) : doset a s t = Set.image2 (· * a * ·) s t := by
simp_rw [doset, Set.mul_singleton, ← Set.image2_mul, Set.image2_image_left]
theorem mem_doset {s t : Set α} {a b : α} : b ∈ doset a s t ↔ ∃ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, b = x * a * y := by
simp only [doset_eq_image2, Set.mem_image2, eq_comm]
theorem mem_doset_self (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) : a ∈ doset a H K :=
mem_doset.mpr ⟨1, H.one_mem, 1, K.one_mem, (one_mul a).symm.trans (mul_one (1 * a)).symm⟩
theorem doset_eq_of_mem {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G} (hb : b ∈ doset a H K) :
doset b H K = doset a H K := by
obtain ⟨h, hh, k, hk, rfl⟩ := mem_doset.1 hb
rw [doset, doset, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, ← Set.singleton_mul_singleton, mul_assoc,
mul_assoc, Subgroup.singleton_mul_subgroup hk, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
Subgroup.subgroup_mul_singleton hh]
theorem mem_doset_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : b ∈ doset a H K := by
rw [Set.not_disjoint_iff] at h
simp only [mem_doset] at *
obtain ⟨x, ⟨l, hl, r, hr, hrx⟩, y, hy, ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩⟩ := h
refine ⟨y⁻¹ * l, H.mul_mem (H.inv_mem hy) hl, r * r'⁻¹, K.mul_mem hr (K.inv_mem hr'), ?_⟩
rwa [mul_assoc, mul_assoc, eq_inv_mul_iff_mul_eq, ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc, eq_mul_inv_iff_mul_eq]
theorem eq_of_not_disjoint {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G}
(h : ¬Disjoint (doset a H K) (doset b H K)) : doset a H K = doset b H K := by
rw [disjoint_comm] at h
have ha : a ∈ doset b H K := mem_doset_of_not_disjoint h
apply doset_eq_of_mem ha
/-- The setoid defined by the double_coset relation -/
def setoid (H K : Set G) : Setoid G :=
Setoid.ker fun x => doset x H K
/-- Quotient of `G` by the double coset relation, i.e. `H \ G / K` -/
def Quotient (H K : Set G) : Type _ :=
_root_.Quotient (setoid H K)
theorem rel_iff {H K : Subgroup G} {x y : G} :
setoid ↑H ↑K x y ↔ ∃ a ∈ H, ∃ b ∈ K, y = a * x * b :=
Iff.trans
⟨fun (hxy : doset x H K = doset y H K) => hxy ▸ mem_doset_self H K y,
fun hxy => (doset_eq_of_mem hxy).symm⟩ mem_doset
theorem bot_rel_eq_leftRel (H : Subgroup G) :
⇑(setoid ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G) ↑H) = ⇑(QuotientGroup.leftRel H) := by
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨a, rfl : a = 1, b, hb, rfl⟩
rwa [one_mul, inv_mul_cancel_left]
· rintro (h : a⁻¹ * b ∈ H)
exact ⟨1, rfl, a⁻¹ * b, h, by rw [one_mul, mul_inv_cancel_left]⟩
theorem rel_bot_eq_right_group_rel (H : Subgroup G) :
⇑(setoid ↑H ↑(⊥ : Subgroup G)) = ⇑(QuotientGroup.rightRel H) := by
ext a b
rw [rel_iff, QuotientGroup.rightRel_apply]
constructor
· rintro ⟨b, hb, a, rfl : a = 1, rfl⟩
rwa [mul_one, mul_inv_cancel_right]
· rintro (h : b * a⁻¹ ∈ H)
exact ⟨b * a⁻¹, h, 1, rfl, by rw [mul_one, inv_mul_cancel_right]⟩
/-- Create a doset out of an element of `H \ G / K` -/
def quotToDoset (H K : Subgroup G) (q : Quotient (H : Set G) K) : Set G :=
doset q.out H K
/-- Map from `G` to `H \ G / K` -/
abbrev mk (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) : Quotient (H : Set G) K :=
Quotient.mk'' a
instance (H K : Subgroup G) : Inhabited (Quotient (H : Set G) K) :=
⟨mk H K (1 : G)⟩
theorem eq (H K : Subgroup G) (a b : G) :
mk H K a = mk H K b ↔ ∃ h ∈ H, ∃ k ∈ K, b = h * a * k := by
rw [Quotient.eq'']
apply rel_iff
theorem out_eq' (H K : Subgroup G) (q : Quotient ↑H ↑K) : mk H K q.out = q :=
Quotient.out_eq' q
theorem mk_out_eq_mul (H K : Subgroup G) (g : G) :
∃ h k : G, h ∈ H ∧ k ∈ K ∧ (mk H K g : Quotient ↑H ↑K).out = h * g * k := by
have := eq H K (mk H K g : Quotient ↑H ↑K).out g
rw [out_eq'] at this
obtain ⟨h, h_h, k, hk, T⟩ := this.1 rfl
refine ⟨h⁻¹, k⁻¹, H.inv_mem h_h, K.inv_mem hk, eq_mul_inv_of_mul_eq (eq_inv_mul_of_mul_eq ?_)⟩
rw [← mul_assoc, ← T]
theorem mk_eq_of_doset_eq {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : G} (h : doset a H K = doset b H K) :
mk H K a = mk H K b := by
rw [eq]
exact mem_doset.mp (h.symm ▸ mem_doset_self H K b)
theorem disjoint_out {H K : Subgroup G} {a b : Quotient H K} :
a ≠ b → Disjoint (doset a.out H K) (doset b.out (H : Set G) K) := by
contrapose!
intro h
simpa [out_eq'] using mk_eq_of_doset_eq (eq_of_not_disjoint h)
theorem union_quotToDoset (H K : Subgroup G) : ⋃ q, quotToDoset H K q = Set.univ := by
ext x
simp only [Set.mem_iUnion, quotToDoset, mem_doset, SetLike.mem_coe, exists_prop, Set.mem_univ,
iff_true]
use mk H K x
obtain ⟨h, k, h3, h4, h5⟩ := mk_out_eq_mul H K x
refine ⟨h⁻¹, H.inv_mem h3, k⁻¹, K.inv_mem h4, ?_⟩
simp only [h5, Subgroup.coe_mk, ← mul_assoc, one_mul, inv_mul_cancel, mul_inv_cancel_right]
theorem doset_union_rightCoset (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) :
⋃ k : K, op (a * k) • ↑H = doset a H K := by
ext x
simp only [mem_rightCoset_iff, exists_prop, mul_inv_rev, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_doset,
Subgroup.mem_carrier, SetLike.mem_coe]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, h_h⟩
refine ⟨x * (y⁻¹ * a⁻¹), h_h, y, y.2, ?_⟩
simp only [← mul_assoc, Subgroup.coe_mk, inv_mul_cancel_right, InvMemClass.coe_inv]
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
refine ⟨⟨y, hy⟩, ?_⟩
simp only [hxy, ← mul_assoc, hx, mul_inv_cancel_right, Subgroup.coe_mk]
theorem doset_union_leftCoset (H K : Subgroup G) (a : G) :
⋃ h : H, (h * a : G) • ↑K = doset a H K := by
| ext x
simp only [mem_leftCoset_iff, mul_inv_rev, Set.mem_iUnion, mem_doset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨y, h_h⟩
refine ⟨y, y.2, a⁻¹ * y⁻¹ * x, h_h, ?_⟩
simp only [← mul_assoc, one_mul, mul_inv_cancel, mul_inv_cancel_right, InvMemClass.coe_inv]
· rintro ⟨x, hx, y, hy, hxy⟩
refine ⟨⟨x, hx⟩, ?_⟩
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/DoubleCoset.lean | 162 | 169 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Trim
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.MeasurableSpace.CountablyGenerated
/-!
# Almost everywhere measurable functions
A function is almost everywhere measurable if it coincides almost everywhere with a measurable
function. This property, called `AEMeasurable f μ`, is defined in the file `MeasureSpaceDef`.
We discuss several of its properties that are analogous to properties of measurable functions.
-/
open MeasureTheory MeasureTheory.Measure Filter Set Function ENNReal
variable {ι α β γ δ R : Type*} {m0 : MeasurableSpace α} [MeasurableSpace β] [MeasurableSpace γ]
[MeasurableSpace δ] {f g : α → β} {μ ν : Measure α}
section
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem Subsingleton.aemeasurable [Subsingleton α] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
Subsingleton.measurable.aemeasurable
@[nontriviality, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_of_subsingleton_codomain [Subsingleton β] : AEMeasurable f μ :=
(measurable_of_subsingleton_codomain f).aemeasurable
@[simp, measurability]
theorem aemeasurable_zero_measure : AEMeasurable f (0 : Measure α) := by
nontriviality α; inhabit α
exact ⟨fun _ => f default, measurable_const, rfl⟩
@[fun_prop]
theorem aemeasurable_id'' (μ : Measure α) {m : MeasurableSpace α} (hm : m ≤ m0) :
@AEMeasurable α α m m0 id μ :=
@Measurable.aemeasurable α α m0 m id μ (measurable_id'' hm)
lemma aemeasurable_of_map_neZero {μ : Measure α}
{f : α → β} (h : NeZero (μ.map f)) :
AEMeasurable f μ := by
by_contra h'
simp [h'] at h
namespace AEMeasurable
lemma mono_ac (hf : AEMeasurable f ν) (hμν : μ ≪ ν) : AEMeasurable f μ :=
⟨hf.mk f, hf.measurable_mk, hμν.ae_le hf.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem mono_measure (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≤ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
mono_ac h h'.absolutelyContinuous
theorem mono_set {s t} (h : s ⊆ t) (ht : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict t)) :
AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s) :=
ht.mono_measure (restrict_mono h le_rfl)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem mono' (h : AEMeasurable f μ) (h' : ν ≪ μ) : AEMeasurable f ν :=
⟨h.mk f, h.measurable_mk, h' h.ae_eq_mk⟩
theorem ae_mem_imp_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) :
∀ᵐ x ∂μ, x ∈ s → f x = h.mk f x :=
ae_imp_of_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
theorem ae_inf_principal_eq_mk {s} (h : AEMeasurable f (μ.restrict s)) : f =ᶠ[ae μ ⊓ 𝓟 s] h.mk f :=
le_ae_restrict h.ae_eq_mk
@[measurability]
theorem sum_measure [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} (h : ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i)) :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) := by
classical
nontriviality β
inhabit β
set s : ι → Set α := fun i => toMeasurable (μ i) { x | f x ≠ (h i).mk f x }
have hsμ : ∀ i, μ i (s i) = 0 := by
intro i
rw [measure_toMeasurable]
exact (h i).ae_eq_mk
have hsm : MeasurableSet (⋂ i, s i) :=
MeasurableSet.iInter fun i => measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _
| have hs : ∀ i x, x ∉ s i → f x = (h i).mk f x := by
intro i x hx
contrapose! hx
exact subset_toMeasurable _ _ hx
set g : α → β := (⋂ i, s i).piecewise (const α default) f
refine ⟨g, measurable_of_restrict_of_restrict_compl hsm ?_ ?_, ae_sum_iff.mpr fun i => ?_⟩
· rw [restrict_piecewise]
simp only [s, Set.restrict, const]
exact measurable_const
· rw [restrict_piecewise_compl, compl_iInter]
intro t ht
refine ⟨⋃ i, (h i).mk f ⁻¹' t ∩ (s i)ᶜ, MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i ↦
(measurable_mk _ ht).inter (measurableSet_toMeasurable _ _).compl, ?_⟩
ext ⟨x, hx⟩
simp only [mem_preimage, mem_iUnion, Subtype.coe_mk, Set.restrict, mem_inter_iff,
mem_compl_iff] at hx ⊢
constructor
· rintro ⟨i, hxt, hxs⟩
rwa [hs _ _ hxs]
· rcases hx with ⟨i, hi⟩
rw [hs _ _ hi]
exact fun h => ⟨i, h, hi⟩
· refine measure_mono_null (fun x (hx : f x ≠ g x) => ?_) (hsμ i)
contrapose! hx
refine (piecewise_eq_of_not_mem _ _ _ ?_).symm
exact fun h => hx (mem_iInter.1 h i)
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff [Countable ι] {μ : ι → Measure α} :
AEMeasurable f (sum μ) ↔ ∀ i, AEMeasurable f (μ i) :=
⟨fun h _ => h.mono_measure (le_sum _ _), sum_measure⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.aemeasurable_add_measure_iff :
AEMeasurable f (μ + ν) ↔ AEMeasurable f μ ∧ AEMeasurable f ν := by
rw [← sum_cond, aemeasurable_sum_measure_iff, Bool.forall_bool, and_comm]
rfl
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/AEMeasurable.lean | 84 | 120 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Finite
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Powerset
/-!
# Noncomputable Set Cardinality
We define the cardinality of set `s` as a term `Set.encard s : ℕ∞` and a term `Set.ncard s : ℕ`.
The latter takes the junk value of zero if `s` is infinite. Both functions are noncomputable, and
are defined in terms of `ENat.card` (which takes a type as its argument); this file can be seen
as an API for the same function in the special case where the type is a coercion of a `Set`,
allowing for smoother interactions with the `Set` API.
`Set.encard` never takes junk values, so is more mathematically natural than `Set.ncard`, even
though it takes values in a less convenient type. It is probably the right choice in settings where
one is concerned with the cardinalities of sets that may or may not be infinite.
`Set.ncard` has a nicer codomain, but when using it, `Set.Finite` hypotheses are normally needed to
make sure its values are meaningful. More generally, `Set.ncard` is intended to be used over the
obvious alternative `Finset.card` when finiteness is 'propositional' rather than 'structural'.
When working with sets that are finite by virtue of their definition, then `Finset.card` probably
makes more sense. One setting where `Set.ncard` works nicely is in a type `α` with `[Finite α]`,
where every set is automatically finite. In this setting, we use default arguments and a simple
tactic so that finiteness goals are discharged automatically in `Set.ncard` theorems.
## Main Definitions
* `Set.encard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as an extended natural number, with value `⊤` if
`s` is infinite.
* `Set.ncard s` is the cardinality of the set `s` as a natural number, provided `s` is Finite.
If `s` is Infinite, then `Set.ncard s = 0`.
* `toFinite_tac` is a tactic that tries to synthesize a `Set.Finite s` argument with
`Set.toFinite`. This will work for `s : Set α` where there is a `Finite α` instance.
## Implementation Notes
The theorems in this file are very similar to those in `Data.Finset.Card`, but with `Set` operations
instead of `Finset`. We first prove all the theorems for `Set.encard`, and then derive most of the
`Set.ncard` results as a consequence. Things are done this way to avoid reliance on the `Finset` API
for theorems about infinite sets, and to allow for a refactor that removes or modifies `Set.ncard`
in the future.
Nearly all the theorems for `Set.ncard` require finiteness of one or more of their arguments. We
provide this assumption with a default argument of the form `(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac)`,
where `toFinite_tac` will find an `s.Finite` term in the cases where `s` is a set in a `Finite`
type.
Often, where there are two set arguments `s` and `t`, the finiteness of one follows from the other
in the context of the theorem, in which case we only include the ones that are needed, and derive
the other inside the proof. A few of the theorems, such as `ncard_union_le` do not require
finiteness arguments; they are true by coincidence due to junk values.
-/
namespace Set
variable {α β : Type*} {s t : Set α}
/-- The cardinality of a set as a term in `ℕ∞` -/
noncomputable def encard (s : Set α) : ℕ∞ := ENat.card s
@[simp] theorem encard_univ_coe (s : Set α) : encard (univ : Set s) = encard s := by
rw [encard, encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ ↑s)]
theorem encard_univ (α : Type*) :
encard (univ : Set α) = ENat.card α := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)]
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = h.toFinset.card := by
have := h.fintype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card]
theorem encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : encard s = s.toFinset.card := by
have h := toFinite s
rw [h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, toFinite_toFinset]
@[simp] theorem toENat_cardinalMk (s : Set α) : (Cardinal.mk s).toENat = s.encard := rfl
theorem toENat_cardinalMk_subtype (P : α → Prop) :
(Cardinal.mk {x // P x}).toENat = {x | P x}.encard :=
rfl
@[simp] theorem coe_fintypeCard (s : Set α) [Fintype s] : Fintype.card s = s.encard := by
simp [encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (s : Finset α) :
encard (s : Set α) = s.card := by
rw [Finite.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card (Finset.finite_toSet s)]; simp
@[simp] theorem Infinite.encard_eq {s : Set α} (h : s.Infinite) : s.encard = ⊤ := by
have := h.to_subtype
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_top_of_infinite]
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_zero : s.encard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_zero_iff_empty, isEmpty_subtype, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] theorem encard_empty : (∅ : Set α).encard = 0 := by
rw [encard_eq_zero]
theorem nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (h : s.encard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rwa [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero]
theorem encard_ne_zero : s.encard ≠ 0 ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [ne_eq, encard_eq_zero, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
@[simp] theorem encard_pos : 0 < s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, encard_ne_zero]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.encard_pos⟩ := encard_pos
@[simp] theorem encard_singleton (e : α) : ({e} : Set α).encard = 1 := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_eq_coe_fintype_card, Fintype.card_ofSubsingleton, Nat.cast_one]
theorem encard_union_eq (h : Disjoint s t) : (s ∪ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
classical
simp [encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.union h)]
theorem encard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (has : a ∉ s) : (insert a s).encard = s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, encard_union_eq (by simpa), encard_singleton]
theorem Finite.encard_lt_top (h : s.Finite) : s.encard < ⊤ := by
induction s, h using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert hat _ ht' =>
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hat]
exact lt_tsub_iff_right.1 ht'
theorem Finite.encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : s.encard = ENat.toNat s.encard :=
(ENat.coe_toNat h.encard_lt_top.ne).symm
theorem Finite.exists_encard_eq_coe (h : s.Finite) : ∃ (n : ℕ), s.encard = n :=
⟨_, h.encard_eq_coe⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_lt_top_iff : s.encard < ⊤ ↔ s.Finite :=
⟨fun h ↦ by_contra fun h' ↦ h.ne (Infinite.encard_eq h'), Finite.encard_lt_top⟩
@[simp] theorem encard_eq_top_iff : s.encard = ⊤ ↔ s.Infinite := by
rw [← not_iff_not, ← Ne, ← lt_top_iff_ne_top, encard_lt_top_iff, not_infinite]
alias ⟨_, encard_eq_top⟩ := encard_eq_top_iff
theorem encard_ne_top_iff : s.encard ≠ ⊤ ↔ s.Finite := by
simp
theorem finite_of_encard_le_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard ≤ k) : s.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff]; exact h.trans_lt (WithTop.coe_lt_top _)
theorem finite_of_encard_eq_coe {k : ℕ} (h : s.encard = k) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_encard_le_coe h.le
theorem encard_le_coe_iff {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ ∃ (n₀ : ℕ), s.encard = n₀ ∧ n₀ ≤ k :=
⟨fun h ↦ ⟨finite_of_encard_le_coe h, by rwa [ENat.le_coe_iff] at h⟩,
fun ⟨_,⟨n₀,hs, hle⟩⟩ ↦ by rwa [hs, Nat.cast_le]⟩
@[simp]
theorem encard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).encard = s.encard * t.encard := by
simp [Set.encard, ENat.card_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
section Lattice
theorem encard_le_encard (h : s ⊆ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← union_diff_cancel h, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_right]; exact le_self_add
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-05")] alias encard_le_card := encard_le_encard
theorem encard_mono {α : Type*} : Monotone (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ ↦ encard_le_encard
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset (h : s ⊆ t) : (t \ s).encard + s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self, union_eq_self_of_subset_right h]
@[simp] theorem one_le_encard_iff_nonempty : 1 ≤ s.encard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty, Ne, ← encard_eq_zero, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
theorem encard_diff_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s \ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right inter_subset_right disjoint_sdiff_left),
diff_union_inter]
theorem encard_union_add_encard_inter (s t : Set α) :
(s ∪ t).encard + (s ∩ t).encard = s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← diff_union_self, encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, add_right_comm,
encard_diff_add_encard_inter]
theorem encard_eq_encard_iff_encard_diff_eq_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard = t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard = (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_right_inj h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_le_encard_iff_encard_diff_le_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard ≤ (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_lt_encard_iff_encard_diff_lt_encard_diff (h : (s ∩ t).Finite) :
s.encard < t.encard ↔ (s \ t).encard < (t \ s).encard := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_inter s t, ← encard_diff_add_encard_inter t s, inter_comm t s,
WithTop.add_lt_add_iff_right h.encard_lt_top.ne]
theorem encard_union_le (s t : Set α) : (s ∪ t).encard ≤ s.encard + t.encard := by
rw [← encard_union_add_encard_inter]; exact le_self_add
theorem finite_iff_finite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) : s.Finite ↔ t.Finite := by
rw [← encard_lt_top_iff, ← encard_lt_top_iff, h]
theorem infinite_iff_infinite_of_encard_eq_encard (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
s.Infinite ↔ t.Infinite := by rw [← encard_eq_top_iff, h, encard_eq_top_iff]
theorem Finite.finite_of_encard_le {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(h : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : t.Finite :=
encard_lt_top_iff.1 (h.trans_lt hs.encard_lt_top)
lemma Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (ht : t.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t) (hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) :
s = t := by
rw [← zero_add (a := encard s), ← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst] at hts
have hdiff := WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right (ht.subset hst).encard_lt_top.ne hts
rw [nonpos_iff_eq_zero, encard_eq_zero, diff_eq_empty] at hdiff
exact hst.antisymm hdiff
theorem Finite.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (hs : s.Finite) (hst : s ⊆ t)
(hts : t.encard ≤ s.encard) : s = t :=
(hs.finite_of_encard_le hts).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' hst hts
theorem Finite.encard_lt_encard (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊂ t) : s.encard < t.encard :=
(encard_mono h.subset).lt_of_ne fun he ↦ h.ne (hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le h.subset he.symm.le)
theorem encard_strictMono [Finite α] : StrictMono (encard : Set α → ℕ∞) :=
fun _ _ h ↦ (toFinite _).encard_lt_encard h
theorem encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : (s \ t).encard + t.encard = (s ∪ t).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_sdiff_left, diff_union_self]
theorem encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard (s t : Set α) : s.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard + t.encard :=
(encard_mono subset_union_left).trans_eq (encard_diff_add_encard _ _).symm
theorem tsub_encard_le_encard_diff (s t : Set α) : s.encard - t.encard ≤ (s \ t).encard := by
rw [tsub_le_iff_left, add_comm]; apply encard_le_encard_diff_add_encard
theorem encard_add_encard_compl (s : Set α) : s.encard + sᶜ.encard = (univ : Set α).encard := by
rw [← encard_union_eq disjoint_compl_right, union_compl_self]
end Lattice
section InsertErase
variable {a b : α}
theorem encard_insert_le (s : Set α) (x : α) : (insert x s).encard ≤ s.encard + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, ← encard_singleton x]; apply encard_union_le
theorem encard_singleton_inter (s : Set α) (x : α) : ({x} ∩ s).encard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; exact encard_le_encard inter_subset_left
theorem encard_diff_singleton_add_one (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard + 1 = s.encard := by
rw [← encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem encard_diff_singleton_of_mem (h : a ∈ s) :
(s \ {a}).encard = s.encard - 1 := by
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one h, ← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top,
tsub_add_cancel_of_le (self_le_add_left _ _)]
theorem encard_tsub_one_le_encard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (x : α) :
s.encard - 1 ≤ (s \ {x}).encard := by
rw [← encard_singleton x]; apply tsub_encard_le_encard_diff
theorem encard_exchange (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a (s \ {b})).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hb]
simp_all only [not_true, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, false_and, not_false_eq_true]
theorem encard_exchange' (ha : a ∉ s) (hb : b ∈ s) : (insert a s \ {b}).encard = s.encard := by
rw [← insert_diff_singleton_comm (by rintro rfl; exact ha hb), encard_exchange ha hb]
theorem encard_eq_add_one_iff {k : ℕ∞} :
s.encard = k + 1 ↔ (∃ a t, ¬a ∈ t ∧ insert a t = s ∧ t.encard = k) := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨a, ha⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by simp [h])
refine ⟨a, s \ {a}, fun h ↦ h.2 rfl, by rwa [insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem], ?_⟩
rw [← WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, ← h,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]
rintro ⟨a, t, h, rfl, rfl⟩
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
/-- Every set is either empty, infinite, or can have its `encard` reduced by a removal. Intended
for well-founded induction on the value of `encard`. -/
theorem eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt (s : Set α) :
s = ∅ ∨ s.encard = ⊤ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, (s \ {a}).encard < s.encard := by
refine s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim Or.inl (Or.inr ∘ fun ⟨a,ha⟩ ↦
(s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun hfin ↦ Or.inr ⟨a, ha, ?_⟩) (Or.inl ∘ Infinite.encard_eq)))
rw [← encard_diff_singleton_add_one ha]; nth_rw 1 [← add_zero (encard _)]
exact WithTop.add_lt_add_left hfin.diff.encard_lt_top.ne zero_lt_one
end InsertErase
section SmallSets
theorem encard_pair {x y : α} (hne : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : Set α).encard = 2 := by
rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem (by simpa), ← one_add_one_eq_two,
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_singleton]
theorem encard_eq_one : s.encard = 1 ↔ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ by rw [hx, encard_singleton]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
exact ⟨x, ((finite_singleton x).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (by simpa) (by simp [h])).symm⟩
theorem encard_le_one_iff_eq : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ x, s = {x} := by
rw [le_iff_lt_or_eq, lt_iff_not_le, ENat.one_le_iff_ne_zero, not_not, encard_eq_zero,
encard_eq_one]
theorem encard_le_one_iff : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ ∀ a b, a ∈ s → b ∈ s → a = b := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff_eq, or_iff_not_imp_left, ← Ne, ← nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
refine ⟨fun h a b has hbs ↦ ?_,
fun h ⟨x, hx⟩ ↦ ⟨x, ((singleton_subset_iff.2 hx).antisymm' (fun y hy ↦ h _ _ hy hx))⟩⟩
obtain ⟨x, rfl⟩ := h ⟨_, has⟩
rw [(has : a = x), (hbs : b = x)]
theorem encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton : s.encard ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton := by
rw [encard_le_one_iff, Set.Subsingleton]
tauto
theorem one_lt_encard_iff_nontrivial : 1 < s.encard ↔ s.Nontrivial := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_lt, Set.not_nontrivial_iff, ← encard_le_one_iff_subsingleton]
theorem one_lt_encard_iff : 1 < s.encard ↔ ∃ a b, a ∈ s ∧ b ∈ s ∧ a ≠ b := by
rw [← not_iff_not, not_exists, not_lt, encard_le_one_iff]; aesop
theorem exists_ne_of_one_lt_encard (h : 1 < s.encard) (a : α) : ∃ b ∈ s, b ≠ a := by
by_contra! h'
obtain ⟨b, b', hb, hb', hne⟩ := one_lt_encard_iff.1 h
apply hne
rw [h' b hb, h' b' hb']
theorem encard_eq_two : s.encard = 2 ↔ ∃ x y, x ≠ y ∧ s = {x, y} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, hne, hs⟩ ↦ by rw [hs, encard_pair hne]⟩
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton, encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl),
← one_add_one_eq_two, WithTop.add_right_inj (WithTop.one_ne_top), encard_eq_one] at h
obtain ⟨y, h⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, by rintro rfl; exact (h.symm.subset rfl).2 rfl, ?_⟩
rw [← h, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
theorem encard_eq_three {α : Type u_1} {s : Set α} :
encard s = 3 ↔ ∃ x y z, x ≠ y ∧ x ≠ z ∧ y ≠ z ∧ s = {x, y, z} := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun ⟨x, y, z, hxy, hyz, hxz, hs⟩ ↦ ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := nonempty_of_encard_ne_zero (s := s) (by rw [h]; simp)
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem hx, ← insert_diff_singleton,
encard_insert_of_not_mem (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl), (by exact rfl : (3 : ℕ∞) = 2 + 1),
WithTop.add_right_inj WithTop.one_ne_top, encard_eq_two] at h
obtain ⟨y, z, hne, hs⟩ := h
refine ⟨x, y, z, ?_, ?_, hne, ?_⟩
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inl rfl)).2 rfl
· rintro rfl; exact (hs.symm.subset (Or.inr rfl)).2 rfl
rw [← hs, insert_diff_singleton, insert_eq_of_mem hx]
rw [hs, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_insert_of_not_mem, encard_singleton] <;> aesop
theorem Nat.encard_range (k : ℕ) : {i | i < k}.encard = k := by
convert encard_coe_eq_coe_finsetCard (Finset.range k) using 1
· rw [Finset.coe_range, Iio_def]
rw [Finset.card_range]
end SmallSets
theorem Finite.eq_insert_of_subset_of_encard_eq_succ (hs : s.Finite) (h : s ⊆ t)
(hst : t.encard = s.encard + 1) : ∃ a, t = insert a s := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset h, add_comm, WithTop.add_left_inj hs.encard_lt_top.ne,
encard_eq_one] at hst
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hst; use x; rw [← diff_union_of_subset h, hx, singleton_union]
theorem exists_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞} (hk : k ≤ s.encard) : ∃ t, t ⊆ s ∧ t.encard = k := by
revert hk
refine ENat.nat_induction k (fun _ ↦ ⟨∅, empty_subset _, by simp⟩) (fun n IH hle ↦ ?_) ?_
· obtain ⟨t₀, ht₀s, ht₀⟩ := IH (le_trans (by simp) hle)
simp only [Nat.cast_succ] at *
have hne : t₀ ≠ s := by
rintro rfl; rw [ht₀, ← Nat.cast_one, ← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le] at hle; simp at hle
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := exists_of_ssubset (ht₀s.ssubset_of_ne hne)
exact ⟨insert x t₀, insert_subset hx.1 ht₀s, by rw [encard_insert_of_not_mem hx.2, ht₀]⟩
simp only [top_le_iff, encard_eq_top_iff]
exact fun _ hi ↦ ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hi⟩
theorem exists_superset_subset_encard_eq {k : ℕ∞}
(hst : s ⊆ t) (hsk : s.encard ≤ k) (hkt : k ≤ t.encard) :
∃ r, s ⊆ r ∧ r ⊆ t ∧ r.encard = k := by
obtain (hs | hs) := eq_or_ne s.encard ⊤
· rw [hs, top_le_iff] at hsk; subst hsk; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, hst, hs⟩
obtain ⟨k, rfl⟩ := exists_add_of_le hsk
obtain ⟨k', hk'⟩ := exists_add_of_le hkt
have hk : k ≤ encard (t \ s) := by
rw [← encard_diff_add_encard_of_subset hst, add_comm] at hkt
exact WithTop.le_of_add_le_add_right hs hkt
obtain ⟨r', hr', rfl⟩ := exists_subset_encard_eq hk
refine ⟨s ∪ r', subset_union_left, union_subset hst (hr'.trans diff_subset), ?_⟩
rw [encard_union_eq (disjoint_of_subset_right hr' disjoint_sdiff_right)]
section Function
variable {s : Set α} {t : Set β} {f : α → β}
theorem InjOn.encard_image (h : InjOn f s) : (f '' s).encard = s.encard := by
rw [encard, ENat.card_image_of_injOn h, encard]
theorem encard_congr (e : s ≃ t) : s.encard = t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← encard_univ_coe t, encard_univ, encard_univ, ENat.card_congr e]
theorem _root_.Function.Injective.encard_image (hf : f.Injective) (s : Set α) :
(f '' s).encard = s.encard :=
hf.injOn.encard_image
theorem _root_.Function.Embedding.encard_le (e : s ↪ t) : s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← encard_univ_coe, ← e.injective.encard_image, ← Subtype.coe_injective.encard_image]
exact encard_mono (by simp)
theorem encard_image_le (f : α → β) (s : Set α) : (f '' s).encard ≤ s.encard := by
obtain (h | h) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image]
apply encard_le_encard
exact f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s
theorem Finite.injOn_of_encard_image_eq (hs : s.Finite) (h : (f '' s).encard = s.encard) :
InjOn f s := by
obtain (h' | hne) := isEmpty_or_nonempty α
· rw [s.eq_empty_of_isEmpty]; simp
rw [← (f.invFunOn_injOn_image s).encard_image] at h
rw [injOn_iff_invFunOn_image_image_eq_self]
exact hs.eq_of_subset_of_encard_le' (f.invFunOn_image_image_subset s) h.symm.le
theorem encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range (hf : f.Injective) (ht : t ⊆ range f) :
(f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard := by
rw [← hf.encard_image, image_preimage_eq_inter_range, inter_eq_self_of_subset_left ht]
lemma encard_preimage_of_bijective (hf : f.Bijective) (t : Set β) : (f ⁻¹' t).encard = t.encard :=
encard_preimage_of_injective_subset_range hf.injective (by simp [hf.surjective.range_eq])
theorem encard_le_encard_of_injOn (hf : MapsTo f s t) (f_inj : InjOn f s) :
s.encard ≤ t.encard := by
rw [← f_inj.encard_image]; apply encard_le_encard; rintro _ ⟨x, hx, rfl⟩; exact hf hx
theorem Finite.exists_injOn_of_encard_le [Nonempty β] {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (hs : s.Finite)
(hle : s.encard ≤ t.encard) : ∃ (f : α → β), s ⊆ f ⁻¹' t ∧ InjOn f s := by
classical
obtain (rfl | h | ⟨a, has, -⟩) := s.eq_empty_or_encard_eq_top_or_encard_diff_singleton_lt
· simp
· exact (encard_ne_top_iff.mpr hs h).elim
obtain ⟨b, hbt⟩ := encard_pos.1 ((encard_pos.2 ⟨_, has⟩).trans_le hle)
have hle' : (s \ {a}).encard ≤ (t \ {b}).encard := by
rwa [← WithTop.add_le_add_iff_right WithTop.one_ne_top,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one has, encard_diff_singleton_add_one hbt]
obtain ⟨f₀, hf₀s, hinj⟩ := exists_injOn_of_encard_le hs.diff hle'
simp only [preimage_diff, subset_def, mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, mem_preimage, and_imp] at hf₀s
use Function.update f₀ a b
rw [← insert_eq_of_mem has, ← insert_diff_singleton, injOn_insert (fun h ↦ h.2 rfl)]
simp only [mem_diff, mem_singleton_iff, not_true, and_false, insert_diff_singleton, subset_def,
mem_insert_iff, mem_preimage, ne_eq, Function.update_apply, forall_eq_or_imp, ite_true, and_imp,
mem_image, ite_eq_left_iff, not_exists, not_and, not_forall, exists_prop, and_iff_right hbt]
refine ⟨?_, ?_, fun x hxs hxa ↦ ⟨hxa, (hf₀s x hxs hxa).2⟩⟩
· rintro x hx; split_ifs with h
· assumption
· exact (hf₀s x hx h).1
exact InjOn.congr hinj (fun x ⟨_, hxa⟩ ↦ by rwa [Function.update_of_ne])
termination_by encard s
theorem Finite.exists_bijOn_of_encard_eq [Nonempty β] (hs : s.Finite) (h : s.encard = t.encard) :
∃ (f : α → β), BijOn f s t := by
obtain ⟨f, hf, hinj⟩ := hs.exists_injOn_of_encard_le h.le; use f
convert hinj.bijOn_image
rw [(hs.image f).eq_of_subset_of_encard_le (image_subset_iff.mpr hf)
(h.symm.trans hinj.encard_image.symm).le]
end Function
section ncard
open Nat
/-- A tactic (for use in default params) that applies `Set.toFinite` to synthesize a `Set.Finite`
term. -/
syntax "toFinite_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| toFinite_tac) => `(tactic| apply Set.toFinite)
/-- A tactic useful for transferring proofs for `encard` to their corresponding `card` statements -/
syntax "to_encard_tac" : tactic
macro_rules
| `(tactic| to_encard_tac) => `(tactic|
simp only [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one])
/-- The cardinality of `s : Set α` . Has the junk value `0` if `s` is infinite -/
noncomputable def ncard (s : Set α) : ℕ := ENat.toNat s.encard
theorem ncard_def (s : Set α) : s.ncard = ENat.toNat s.encard := rfl
theorem Finite.cast_ncard_eq (hs : s.Finite) : s.ncard = s.encard := by
rwa [ncard, ENat.coe_toNat_eq_self, ne_eq, encard_eq_top_iff, Set.Infinite, not_not]
lemma ncard_le_encard (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ s.encard := ENat.coe_toNat_le_self _
theorem Nat.card_coe_set_eq (s : Set α) : Nat.card s = s.ncard := by
obtain (h | h) := s.finite_or_infinite
· have := h.fintype
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq_coe_toFinset_card, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card,
toFinite_toFinset, toFinset_card, ENat.toNat_coe]
have := infinite_coe_iff.2 h
rw [ncard, h.encard_eq, Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, ENat.toNat_top]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = hs.toFinset.card := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_fintype_card _ hs.fintype,
@Finite.card_toFinset _ _ hs.fintype hs]
theorem ncard_eq_toFinset_card' (s : Set α) [Fintype s] :
s.ncard = s.toFinset.card := by
simp [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
lemma cast_ncard {s : Set α} (hs : s.Finite) :
(s.ncard : Cardinal) = Cardinal.mk s := @Nat.cast_card _ hs
theorem encard_le_coe_iff_finite_ncard_le {k : ℕ} : s.encard ≤ k ↔ s.Finite ∧ s.ncard ≤ k := by
rw [encard_le_coe_iff, and_congr_right_iff]
exact fun hfin ↦ ⟨fun ⟨n₀, hn₀, hle⟩ ↦ by rwa [ncard_def, hn₀, ENat.toNat_coe],
fun h ↦ ⟨s.ncard, by rw [hfin.cast_ncard_eq], h⟩⟩
theorem Infinite.ncard (hs : s.Infinite) : s.ncard = 0 := by
rw [← Nat.card_coe_set_eq, @Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite _ hs.to_subtype]
@[gcongr]
theorem ncard_le_ncard (hst : s ⊆ t) (ht : t.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard ≤ t.ncard := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), ht.cast_ncard_eq, (ht.subset hst).cast_ncard_eq]
exact encard_mono hst
theorem ncard_mono [Finite α] : @Monotone (Set α) _ _ _ ncard := fun _ _ ↦ ncard_le_ncard
@[simp] theorem ncard_eq_zero (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
s.ncard = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), hs.cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_zero, encard_eq_zero]
@[simp, norm_cast] theorem ncard_coe_Finset (s : Finset α) : (s : Set α).ncard = s.card := by
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card _, Finset.finite_toSet_toFinset]
theorem ncard_univ (α : Type*) : (univ : Set α).ncard = Nat.card α := by
rcases finite_or_infinite α with h | h
· have hft := Fintype.ofFinite α
rw [ncard_eq_toFinset_card, Finite.toFinset_univ, Finset.card_univ, Nat.card_eq_fintype_card]
rw [Nat.card_eq_zero_of_infinite, Infinite.ncard]
exact infinite_univ
@[simp] theorem ncard_empty (α : Type*) : (∅ : Set α).ncard = 0 := by
rw [ncard_eq_zero]
theorem ncard_pos (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : 0 < s.ncard ↔ s.Nonempty := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, ncard_eq_zero hs, nonempty_iff_ne_empty]
protected alias ⟨_, Nonempty.ncard_pos⟩ := ncard_pos
theorem ncard_ne_zero_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : s.ncard ≠ 0 :=
((ncard_pos hs).mpr ⟨a, h⟩).ne.symm
theorem finite_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Finite :=
s.finite_or_infinite.elim id fun h ↦ (hs h.ncard).elim
theorem finite_of_ncard_pos (hs : 0 < s.ncard) : s.Finite :=
finite_of_ncard_ne_zero hs.ne.symm
theorem nonempty_of_ncard_ne_zero (hs : s.ncard ≠ 0) : s.Nonempty := by
rw [nonempty_iff_ne_empty]; rintro rfl; simp at hs
@[simp] theorem ncard_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Set α).ncard = 1 := by
simp [ncard]
theorem ncard_singleton_inter (a : α) (s : Set α) : ({a} ∩ s).ncard ≤ 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := ℕ∞), (toFinite _).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_one]
apply encard_singleton_inter
@[simp]
theorem ncard_prod : (s ×ˢ t).ncard = s.ncard * t.ncard := by
simp [ncard, ENat.toNat_mul]
@[simp]
theorem ncard_powerset (s : Set α) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(𝒫 s).ncard = 2 ^ s.ncard := by
have h := Cardinal.mk_powerset s
rw [← cast_ncard hs.powerset, ← cast_ncard hs] at h
norm_cast at h
section InsertErase
@[simp] theorem ncard_insert_of_not_mem {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(insert a s).ncard = s.ncard + 1 := by
rw [← Nat.cast_inj (R := ℕ∞), (hs.insert a).cast_ncard_eq, Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_one,
hs.cast_ncard_eq, encard_insert_of_not_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) : ncard (insert a s) = s.ncard := by
rw [insert_eq_of_mem h]
theorem ncard_insert_le (a : α) (s : Set α) : (insert a s).ncard ≤ s.ncard + 1 := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, (hs.insert _).cast_ncard_eq]; apply encard_insert_le
rw [(hs.mono (subset_insert a s)).ncard]
exact Nat.zero_le _
theorem ncard_insert_eq_ite {a : α} [Decidable (a ∈ s)] (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
ncard (insert a s) = if a ∈ s then s.ncard else s.ncard + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· rw [ncard_insert_of_mem h, if_pos h]
· rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem h hs, if_neg h]
theorem ncard_le_ncard_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : s.ncard ≤ (insert a s).ncard := by
classical
refine
s.finite_or_infinite.elim (fun h ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ by (rw [h.ncard]; exact Nat.zero_le _))
rw [ncard_insert_eq_ite h]; split_ifs <;> simp
@[simp] theorem ncard_pair {a b : α} (h : a ≠ b) : ({a, b} : Set α).ncard = 2 := by
rw [ncard_insert_of_not_mem, ncard_singleton]; simpa
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_add_one {a : α} (h : a ∈ s)
(hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) : (s \ {a}).ncard + 1 = s.ncard := by
to_encard_tac; rw [hs.cast_ncard_eq, hs.diff.cast_ncard_eq,
encard_diff_singleton_add_one h]
@[simp] theorem ncard_diff_singleton_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard = s.ncard - 1 :=
eq_tsub_of_add_eq (ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs)
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_lt_of_mem {a : α} (h : a ∈ s) (hs : s.Finite := by toFinite_tac) :
(s \ {a}).ncard < s.ncard := by
rw [← ncard_diff_singleton_add_one h hs]; apply lt_add_one
theorem ncard_diff_singleton_le (s : Set α) (a : α) : (s \ {a}).ncard ≤ s.ncard := by
obtain hs | hs := s.finite_or_infinite
· apply ncard_le_ncard diff_subset hs
| convert zero_le (α := ℕ) _
exact (hs.diff (by simp : Set.Finite {a})).ncard
theorem pred_ncard_le_ncard_diff_singleton (s : Set α) (a : α) : s.ncard - 1 ≤ (s \ {a}).ncard := by
| Mathlib/Data/Set/Card.lean | 642 | 645 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Rémy Degenne. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Rémy Degenne, Kexing Ying
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.ConditionalExpectation.Indicator
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Function.UniformIntegrable
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.VectorMeasure.Decomposition.RadonNikodym
/-!
# Conditional expectation of real-valued functions
This file proves some results regarding the conditional expectation of real-valued functions.
## Main results
* `MeasureTheory.rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp`: the conditional expectation `μ[f | m]` is equal to the
Radon-Nikodym derivative of `fμ` restricted on `m` with respect to `μ` restricted on `m`.
* `MeasureTheory.Integrable.uniformIntegrable_condExp`: the conditional expectation of a function
form a uniformly integrable class.
* `MeasureTheory.condExp_mul_of_stronglyMeasurable_left`: the pull-out property of the conditional
expectation.
-/
noncomputable section
open TopologicalSpace MeasureTheory.Lp Filter ContinuousLinearMap
open scoped NNReal ENNReal Topology MeasureTheory
namespace MeasureTheory
variable {α : Type*} {m m0 : MeasurableSpace α} {μ : Measure α}
theorem rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp {hm : m ≤ m0} [hμm : SigmaFinite (μ.trim hm)] {f : α → ℝ}
(hf : Integrable f μ) :
| SignedMeasure.rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm) =ᵐ[μ] μ[f|m] := by
refine ae_eq_condExp_of_forall_setIntegral_eq hm hf ?_ ?_ ?_
· exact fun _ _ _ => (integrable_of_integrable_trim hm
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm))).integrableOn
· intro s hs _
conv_rhs => rw [← hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_eq_integral hm hs,
← SignedMeasure.withDensityᵥ_rnDeriv_eq ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)
(hf.withDensityᵥ_trim_absolutelyContinuous hm)]
rw [withDensityᵥ_apply
(SignedMeasure.integrable_rnDeriv ((μ.withDensityᵥ f).trim hm) (μ.trim hm)) hs,
← setIntegral_trim hm _ hs]
exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable
· exact (SignedMeasure.measurable_rnDeriv _ _).stronglyMeasurable.aestronglyMeasurable
@[deprecated (since := "2025-01-21")] alias rnDeriv_ae_eq_condexp := rnDeriv_ae_eq_condExp
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Function/ConditionalExpectation/Real.lean | 40 | 54 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Jeremy Avigad
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Group.Basic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Pi
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.Defs
/-!
# Theory of filters on sets
A *filter* on a type `α` is a collection of sets of `α` which contains the whole `α`,
is upwards-closed, and is stable under intersection. They are mostly used to
abstract two related kinds of ideas:
* *limits*, including finite or infinite limits of sequences, finite or infinite limits of functions
at a point or at infinity, etc...
* *things happening eventually*, including things happening for large enough `n : ℕ`, or near enough
a point `x`, or for close enough pairs of points, or things happening almost everywhere in the
sense of measure theory. Dually, filters can also express the idea of *things happening often*:
for arbitrarily large `n`, or at a point in any neighborhood of given a point etc...
## Main definitions
In this file, we endow `Filter α` it with a complete lattice structure.
This structure is lifted from the lattice structure on `Set (Set X)` using the Galois
insertion which maps a filter to its elements in one direction, and an arbitrary set of sets to
the smallest filter containing it in the other direction.
We also prove `Filter` is a monadic functor, with a push-forward operation
`Filter.map` and a pull-back operation `Filter.comap` that form a Galois connections for the
order on filters.
The examples of filters appearing in the description of the two motivating ideas are:
* `(Filter.atTop : Filter ℕ)` : made of sets of `ℕ` containing `{n | n ≥ N}` for some `N`
* `𝓝 x` : made of neighborhoods of `x` in a topological space (defined in topology.basic)
* `𝓤 X` : made of entourages of a uniform space (those space are generalizations of metric spaces
defined in `Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean`)
* `MeasureTheory.ae` : made of sets whose complement has zero measure with respect to `μ`
(defined in `Mathlib/MeasureTheory/OuterMeasure/AE`)
The predicate "happening eventually" is `Filter.Eventually`, and "happening often" is
`Filter.Frequently`, whose definitions are immediate after `Filter` is defined (but they come
rather late in this file in order to immediately relate them to the lattice structure).
## Notations
* `∀ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Eventually p`;
* `∃ᶠ x in f, p x` : `f.Frequently p`;
* `f =ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x`;
* `f ≤ᶠ[l] g` : `∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≤ g x`;
* `𝓟 s` : `Filter.Principal s`, localized in `Filter`.
## References
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
Important note: Bourbaki requires that a filter on `X` cannot contain all sets of `X`, which
we do *not* require. This gives `Filter X` better formal properties, in particular a bottom element
`⊥` for its lattice structure, at the cost of including the assumption
`[NeBot f]` in a number of lemmas and definitions.
-/
assert_not_exists OrderedSemiring Fintype
open Function Set Order
open scoped symmDiff
universe u v w x y
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
instance inhabitedMem : Inhabited { s : Set α // s ∈ f } :=
⟨⟨univ, f.univ_sets⟩⟩
theorem filter_eq_iff : f = g ↔ f.sets = g.sets :=
⟨congr_arg _, filter_eq⟩
@[simp] theorem sets_subset_sets : f.sets ⊆ g.sets ↔ g ≤ f := .rfl
@[simp] theorem sets_ssubset_sets : f.sets ⊂ g.sets ↔ g < f := .rfl
/-- An extensionality lemma that is useful for filters with good lemmas about `sᶜ ∈ f` (e.g.,
`Filter.comap`, `Filter.coprod`, `Filter.Coprod`, `Filter.cofinite`). -/
protected theorem coext (h : ∀ s, sᶜ ∈ f ↔ sᶜ ∈ g) : f = g :=
Filter.ext <| compl_surjective.forall.2 h
instance : Trans (· ⊇ ·) ((· ∈ ·) : Set α → Filter α → Prop) (· ∈ ·) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₂ h₁
instance : Trans Membership.mem (· ⊆ ·) (Membership.mem : Filter α → Set α → Prop) where
trans h₁ h₂ := mem_of_superset h₁ h₂
@[simp]
theorem inter_mem_iff {s t : Set α} : s ∩ t ∈ f ↔ s ∈ f ∧ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨mem_of_superset h inter_subset_left, mem_of_superset h inter_subset_right⟩,
and_imp.2 inter_mem⟩
theorem diff_mem {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : tᶜ ∈ f) : s \ t ∈ f :=
inter_mem hs ht
theorem congr_sets (h : { x | x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t } ∈ f) : s ∈ f ↔ t ∈ f :=
⟨fun hs => mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mp), fun hs =>
mp_mem hs (mem_of_superset h fun _ => Iff.mpr)⟩
lemma copy_eq {S} (hmem : ∀ s, s ∈ S ↔ s ∈ f) : f.copy S hmem = f := Filter.ext hmem
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.biInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem biInter_mem' {β : Type v} {s : β → Set α} {is : Set β} (hf : is.Subsingleton) :
(⋂ i ∈ is, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i ∈ is, s i ∈ f := by
apply Subsingleton.induction_on hf <;> simp
/-- Weaker version of `Filter.iInter_mem` that assumes `Subsingleton β` rather than `Finite β`. -/
theorem iInter_mem' {β : Sort v} {s : β → Set α} [Subsingleton β] :
(⋂ i, s i) ∈ f ↔ ∀ i, s i ∈ f := by
rw [← sInter_range, sInter_eq_biInter, biInter_mem' (subsingleton_range s), forall_mem_range]
theorem exists_mem_subset_iff : (∃ t ∈ f, t ⊆ s) ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun ⟨_, ht, ts⟩ => mem_of_superset ht ts, fun hs => ⟨s, hs, Subset.rfl⟩⟩
theorem monotone_mem {f : Filter α} : Monotone fun s => s ∈ f := fun _ _ hst h =>
mem_of_superset h hst
theorem exists_mem_and_iff {P : Set α → Prop} {Q : Set α → Prop} (hP : Antitone P)
(hQ : Antitone Q) : ((∃ u ∈ f, P u) ∧ ∃ u ∈ f, Q u) ↔ ∃ u ∈ f, P u ∧ Q u := by
constructor
· rintro ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, v, hvf, hQv⟩
exact
⟨u ∩ v, inter_mem huf hvf, hP inter_subset_left hPu, hQ inter_subset_right hQv⟩
· rintro ⟨u, huf, hPu, hQu⟩
exact ⟨⟨u, huf, hPu⟩, u, huf, hQu⟩
theorem forall_in_swap {β : Type*} {p : Set α → β → Prop} :
(∀ a ∈ f, ∀ (b), p a b) ↔ ∀ (b), ∀ a ∈ f, p a b :=
Set.forall_in_swap
end Filter
namespace Filter
variable {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {δ : Type*} {ι : Sort x}
theorem mem_principal_self (s : Set α) : s ∈ 𝓟 s := Subset.rfl
section Lattice
variable {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α}
protected theorem not_le : ¬f ≤ g ↔ ∃ s ∈ g, s ∉ f := by simp_rw [le_def, not_forall, exists_prop]
/-- `GenerateSets g s`: `s` is in the filter closure of `g`. -/
inductive GenerateSets (g : Set (Set α)) : Set α → Prop
| basic {s : Set α} : s ∈ g → GenerateSets g s
| univ : GenerateSets g univ
| superset {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → s ⊆ t → GenerateSets g t
| inter {s t : Set α} : GenerateSets g s → GenerateSets g t → GenerateSets g (s ∩ t)
/-- `generate g` is the largest filter containing the sets `g`. -/
def generate (g : Set (Set α)) : Filter α where
sets := {s | GenerateSets g s}
univ_sets := GenerateSets.univ
sets_of_superset := GenerateSets.superset
inter_sets := GenerateSets.inter
lemma mem_generate_of_mem {s : Set <| Set α} {U : Set α} (h : U ∈ s) :
U ∈ generate s := GenerateSets.basic h
theorem le_generate_iff {s : Set (Set α)} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ generate s ↔ s ⊆ f.sets :=
Iff.intro (fun h _ hu => h <| GenerateSets.basic <| hu) fun h _ hu =>
hu.recOn (fun h' => h h') univ_mem (fun _ hxy hx => mem_of_superset hx hxy) fun _ _ hx hy =>
inter_mem hx hy
@[simp] lemma generate_singleton (s : Set α) : generate {s} = 𝓟 s :=
le_antisymm (fun _t ht ↦ mem_of_superset (mem_generate_of_mem <| mem_singleton _) ht) <|
le_generate_iff.2 <| singleton_subset_iff.2 Subset.rfl
/-- `mkOfClosure s hs` constructs a filter on `α` whose elements set is exactly
`s : Set (Set α)`, provided one gives the assumption `hs : (generate s).sets = s`. -/
protected def mkOfClosure (s : Set (Set α)) (hs : (generate s).sets = s) : Filter α where
sets := s
univ_sets := hs ▸ univ_mem
sets_of_superset := hs ▸ mem_of_superset
inter_sets := hs ▸ inter_mem
theorem mkOfClosure_sets {s : Set (Set α)} {hs : (generate s).sets = s} :
Filter.mkOfClosure s hs = generate s :=
Filter.ext fun u =>
show u ∈ (Filter.mkOfClosure s hs).sets ↔ u ∈ (generate s).sets from hs.symm ▸ Iff.rfl
/-- Galois insertion from sets of sets into filters. -/
def giGenerate (α : Type*) :
@GaloisInsertion (Set (Set α)) (Filter α)ᵒᵈ _ _ Filter.generate Filter.sets where
gc _ _ := le_generate_iff
le_l_u _ _ h := GenerateSets.basic h
choice s hs := Filter.mkOfClosure s (le_antisymm hs <| le_generate_iff.1 <| le_rfl)
choice_eq _ _ := mkOfClosure_sets
theorem mem_inf_iff {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, s = t₁ ∩ t₂ :=
Iff.rfl
theorem mem_inf_of_left {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ f) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, h, univ, univ_mem, (inter_univ s).symm⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_right {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : s ∈ g) : s ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨univ, univ_mem, s, h, (univ_inter s).symm⟩
theorem inter_mem_inf {α : Type u} {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) :
s ∩ t ∈ f ⊓ g :=
⟨s, hs, t, ht, rfl⟩
theorem mem_inf_of_inter {f g : Filter α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g)
(h : s ∩ t ⊆ u) : u ∈ f ⊓ g :=
mem_of_superset (inter_mem_inf hs ht) h
theorem mem_inf_iff_superset {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} :
s ∈ f ⊓ g ↔ ∃ t₁ ∈ f, ∃ t₂ ∈ g, t₁ ∩ t₂ ⊆ s :=
⟨fun ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq⟩ => ⟨t₁, h₁, t₂, h₂, Eq ▸ Subset.rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, h₁, _, h₂, sub⟩ =>
mem_inf_of_inter h₁ h₂ sub⟩
section CompleteLattice
/-- Complete lattice structure on `Filter α`. -/
instance instCompleteLatticeFilter : CompleteLattice (Filter α) where
inf a b := min a b
sup a b := max a b
le_sup_left _ _ _ h := h.1
le_sup_right _ _ _ h := h.2
sup_le _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _ h := ⟨h₁ h, h₂ h⟩
inf_le_left _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_left
inf_le_right _ _ _ := mem_inf_of_right
le_inf := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ _s ⟨_a, ha, _b, hb, hs⟩ => hs.symm ▸ inter_mem (h₁ ha) (h₂ hb)
le_sSup _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := h₂ h₁
sSup_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ _ h₃ := h₁ _ h₃ h₂
sInf_le _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds]; exact fun _ h₃ ↦ h₃ h₁ h₂
le_sInf _ _ h₁ _ h₂ := by rw [← Filter.sSup_lowerBounds] at h₂; exact h₂ h₁
le_top _ _ := univ_mem'
bot_le _ _ _ := trivial
instance : Inhabited (Filter α) := ⟨⊥⟩
end CompleteLattice
theorem NeBot.ne {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) : f ≠ ⊥ := hf.ne'
@[simp] theorem not_neBot {f : Filter α} : ¬f.NeBot ↔ f = ⊥ := neBot_iff.not_left
theorem NeBot.mono {f g : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
⟨ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot hf.1 hg⟩
theorem neBot_of_le {f g : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] (hg : f ≤ g) : NeBot g :=
hf.mono hg
@[simp] theorem sup_neBot {f g : Filter α} : NeBot (f ⊔ g) ↔ NeBot f ∨ NeBot g := by
simp only [neBot_iff, not_and_or, Ne, sup_eq_bot_iff]
theorem not_disjoint_self_iff : ¬Disjoint f f ↔ f.NeBot := by rw [disjoint_self, neBot_iff]
theorem bot_sets_eq : (⊥ : Filter α).sets = univ := rfl
/-- Either `f = ⊥` or `Filter.NeBot f`. This is a version of `eq_or_ne` that uses `Filter.NeBot`
as the second alternative, to be used as an instance. -/
theorem eq_or_neBot (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ ∨ NeBot f := (eq_or_ne f ⊥).imp_right NeBot.mk
theorem sup_sets_eq {f g : Filter α} : (f ⊔ g).sets = f.sets ∩ g.sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_inf
theorem sSup_sets_eq {s : Set (Filter α)} : (sSup s).sets = ⋂ f ∈ s, (f : Filter α).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_sInf
theorem iSup_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} : (iSup f).sets = ⋂ i, (f i).sets :=
(giGenerate α).gc.u_iInf
theorem generate_empty : Filter.generate ∅ = (⊤ : Filter α) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_bot
theorem generate_univ : Filter.generate univ = (⊥ : Filter α) :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => GenerateSets.basic (mem_univ _)
theorem generate_union {s t : Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (s ∪ t) = Filter.generate s ⊓ Filter.generate t :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_sup
theorem generate_iUnion {s : ι → Set (Set α)} :
Filter.generate (⋃ i, s i) = ⨅ i, Filter.generate (s i) :=
(giGenerate α).gc.l_iSup
@[simp]
theorem mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊔ g ↔ s ∈ f ∧ s ∈ g :=
Iff.rfl
theorem union_mem_sup {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ g) : s ∪ t ∈ f ⊔ g :=
⟨mem_of_superset hs subset_union_left, mem_of_superset ht subset_union_right⟩
@[simp]
theorem mem_iSup {x : Set α} {f : ι → Filter α} : x ∈ iSup f ↔ ∀ i, x ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iSup_sets_eq, mem_iInter]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_neBot {f : ι → Filter α} : (⨆ i, f i).NeBot ↔ ∃ i, (f i).NeBot := by
simp [neBot_iff]
theorem iInf_eq_generate (s : ι → Filter α) : iInf s = generate (⋃ i, (s i).sets) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun _ ↦ by simp [le_generate_iff]
theorem mem_iInf_of_mem {f : ι → Filter α} (i : ι) {s} (hs : s ∈ f i) : s ∈ ⨅ i, f i :=
iInf_le f i hs
@[simp]
theorem le_principal_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : f ≤ 𝓟 s ↔ s ∈ f :=
⟨fun h => h Subset.rfl, fun hs _ ht => mem_of_superset hs ht⟩
theorem Iic_principal (s : Set α) : Iic (𝓟 s) = { l | s ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => le_principal_iff
theorem principal_mono {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ≤ 𝓟 t ↔ s ⊆ t := by
simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_principal]
@[gcongr] alias ⟨_, _root_.GCongr.filter_principal_mono⟩ := principal_mono
@[mono]
theorem monotone_principal : Monotone (𝓟 : Set α → Filter α) := fun _ _ => principal_mono.2
@[simp] theorem principal_eq_iff_eq {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s = 𝓟 t ↔ s = t := by
simp only [le_antisymm_iff, le_principal_iff, mem_principal]; rfl
@[simp] theorem join_principal_eq_sSup {s : Set (Filter α)} : join (𝓟 s) = sSup s := rfl
@[simp] theorem principal_univ : 𝓟 (univ : Set α) = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_top, eq_self_iff_true]
@[simp]
theorem principal_empty : 𝓟 (∅ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
bot_unique fun _ _ => empty_subset _
theorem generate_eq_biInf (S : Set (Set α)) : generate S = ⨅ s ∈ S, 𝓟 s :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun f => by simp [le_generate_iff, le_principal_iff, subset_def]
/-! ### Lattice equations -/
theorem empty_mem_iff_bot {f : Filter α} : ∅ ∈ f ↔ f = ⊥ :=
⟨fun h => bot_unique fun s _ => mem_of_superset h (empty_subset s), fun h => h.symm ▸ mem_bot⟩
theorem nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} [hf : NeBot f] {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
s.eq_empty_or_nonempty.elim (fun h => absurd hs (h.symm ▸ mt empty_mem_iff_bot.mp hf.1)) id
theorem NeBot.nonempty_of_mem {f : Filter α} (hf : NeBot f) {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) : s.Nonempty :=
@Filter.nonempty_of_mem α f hf s hs
@[simp]
theorem empty_not_mem (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : ¬∅ ∈ f := fun h => (nonempty_of_mem h).ne_empty rfl
theorem nonempty_of_neBot (f : Filter α) [NeBot f] : Nonempty α :=
nonempty_of_exists <| nonempty_of_mem (univ_mem : univ ∈ f)
theorem compl_not_mem {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} [NeBot f] (h : s ∈ f) : sᶜ ∉ f := fun hsc =>
(nonempty_of_mem (inter_mem h hsc)).ne_empty <| inter_compl_self s
theorem filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty [IsEmpty α] (f : Filter α) : f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.mp <| univ_mem' isEmptyElim
protected lemma disjoint_iff {f g : Filter α} : Disjoint f g ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, Disjoint s t := by
simp only [disjoint_iff, ← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_iff, inf_eq_inter, bot_eq_empty,
@eq_comm _ ∅]
theorem disjoint_of_disjoint_of_mem {f g : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : Disjoint s t) (hs : s ∈ f)
(ht : t ∈ g) : Disjoint f g :=
Filter.disjoint_iff.mpr ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem NeBot.not_disjoint (hf : f.NeBot) (hs : s ∈ f) (ht : t ∈ f) : ¬Disjoint s t := fun h =>
not_disjoint_self_iff.2 hf <| Filter.disjoint_iff.2 ⟨s, hs, t, ht, h⟩
theorem inf_eq_bot_iff {f g : Filter α} : f ⊓ g = ⊥ ↔ ∃ U ∈ f, ∃ V ∈ g, U ∩ V = ∅ := by
simp only [← disjoint_iff, Filter.disjoint_iff, Set.disjoint_iff_inter_eq_empty]
/-- There is exactly one filter on an empty type. -/
instance unique [IsEmpty α] : Unique (Filter α) where
default := ⊥
uniq := filter_eq_bot_of_isEmpty
theorem NeBot.nonempty (f : Filter α) [hf : f.NeBot] : Nonempty α :=
not_isEmpty_iff.mp fun _ ↦ hf.ne (Subsingleton.elim _ _)
/-- There are only two filters on a `Subsingleton`: `⊥` and `⊤`. If the type is empty, then they are
equal. -/
theorem eq_top_of_neBot [Subsingleton α] (l : Filter α) [NeBot l] : l = ⊤ := by
refine top_unique fun s hs => ?_
obtain rfl : s = univ := Subsingleton.eq_univ_of_nonempty (nonempty_of_mem hs)
exact univ_mem
theorem forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot {f : Filter α} :
(∀ s : Set α, s ∈ f → s.Nonempty) ↔ NeBot f :=
⟨fun h => ⟨fun hf => not_nonempty_empty (h ∅ <| hf.symm ▸ mem_bot)⟩, @nonempty_of_mem _ _⟩
instance instNeBotTop [Nonempty α] : NeBot (⊤ : Filter α) :=
forall_mem_nonempty_iff_neBot.1 fun s hs => by rwa [mem_top.1 hs, ← nonempty_iff_univ_nonempty]
instance instNontrivialFilter [Nonempty α] : Nontrivial (Filter α) :=
⟨⟨⊤, ⊥, instNeBotTop.ne⟩⟩
theorem nontrivial_iff_nonempty : Nontrivial (Filter α) ↔ Nonempty α :=
⟨fun _ =>
by_contra fun h' =>
haveI := not_nonempty_iff.1 h'
not_subsingleton (Filter α) inferInstance,
@Filter.instNontrivialFilter α⟩
theorem eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {S : Set (Filter α)} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ f ∈ S, s ∈ f) : l = sInf S :=
le_antisymm (le_sInf fun f hf _ hs => h.2 ⟨f, hf, hs⟩)
fun _ hs => let ⟨_, hf, hs⟩ := h.1 hs; (sInf_le hf) hs
theorem eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i) : l = iInf f :=
eq_sInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem <| h.trans (exists_range_iff (p := (_ ∈ ·))).symm
theorem eq_biInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem {f : ι → Filter α} {p : ι → Prop} {l : Filter α}
(h : ∀ {s}, s ∈ l ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ s ∈ f i) : l = ⨅ (i) (_ : p i), f i := by
rw [iInf_subtype']
exact eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem fun {_} => by simp only [Subtype.exists, h, exists_prop]
theorem iInf_sets_eq {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [ne : Nonempty ι] :
(iInf f).sets = ⋃ i, (f i).sets :=
let ⟨i⟩ := ne
let u :=
{ sets := ⋃ i, (f i).sets
univ_sets := mem_iUnion.2 ⟨i, univ_mem⟩
sets_of_superset := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
exact fun i hx hxy => ⟨i, mem_of_superset hx hxy⟩
inter_sets := by
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_imp]
intro x y a hx b hy
rcases h a b with ⟨c, ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨c, inter_mem (ha hx) (hb hy)⟩ }
have : u = iInf f := eq_iInf_of_mem_iff_exists_mem mem_iUnion
congr_arg Filter.sets this.symm
theorem mem_iInf_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} (h : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) [Nonempty ι] (s) :
s ∈ iInf f ↔ ∃ i, s ∈ f i := by
simp only [← Filter.mem_sets, iInf_sets_eq h, mem_iUnion]
theorem mem_biInf_of_directed {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) {t : Set α} : (t ∈ ⨅ i ∈ s, f i) ↔ ∃ i ∈ s, t ∈ f i := by
haveI := ne.to_subtype
simp_rw [iInf_subtype', mem_iInf_of_directed h.directed_val, Subtype.exists, exists_prop]
theorem biInf_sets_eq {f : β → Filter α} {s : Set β} (h : DirectedOn (f ⁻¹'o (· ≥ ·)) s)
(ne : s.Nonempty) : (⨅ i ∈ s, f i).sets = ⋃ i ∈ s, (f i).sets :=
ext fun t => by simp [mem_biInf_of_directed h ne]
@[simp]
theorem sup_join {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} : join f₁ ⊔ join f₂ = join (f₁ ⊔ f₂) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_sup, mem_join]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_join {ι : Sort w} {f : ι → Filter (Filter α)} : ⨆ x, join (f x) = join (⨆ x, f x) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_join]
instance : DistribLattice (Filter α) :=
{ Filter.instCompleteLatticeFilter with
le_sup_inf := by
intro x y z s
simp only [and_assoc, mem_inf_iff, mem_sup, exists_prop, exists_imp, and_imp]
rintro hs t₁ ht₁ t₂ ht₂ rfl
exact
⟨t₁, x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_left, ht₁, t₂,
x.sets_of_superset hs inter_subset_right, ht₂, rfl⟩ }
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `ι` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed` for a version assuming `Nonempty α` instead of `Nonempty ι`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
(∀ i, NeBot (f i)) → NeBot (iInf f) :=
not_imp_not.1 <| by simpa only [not_forall, not_neBot, ← empty_mem_iff_bot,
mem_iInf_of_directed hd] using id
/-- If `f : ι → Filter α` is directed, `α` is not empty, and `∀ i, f i ≠ ⊥`, then `iInf f ≠ ⊥`.
See also `iInf_neBot_of_directed'` for a version assuming `Nonempty ι` instead of `Nonempty α`. -/
theorem iInf_neBot_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [hn : Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f)
(hb : ∀ i, NeBot (f i)) : NeBot (iInf f) := by
cases isEmpty_or_nonempty ι
· constructor
simp [iInf_of_empty f, top_ne_bot]
· exact iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd hb
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed' {s : Set (Filter α)} (hne : s.Nonempty) (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
@iInf_neBot_of_directed' _ _ _ hne.to_subtype hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ =>
⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem sInf_neBot_of_directed [Nonempty α] {s : Set (Filter α)} (hd : DirectedOn (· ≥ ·) s)
(hbot : ⊥ ∉ s) : NeBot (sInf s) :=
(sInf_eq_iInf' s).symm ▸
iInf_neBot_of_directed hd.directed_val fun ⟨_, hf⟩ => ⟨ne_of_mem_of_not_mem hf hbot⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed' {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty ι] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed' hd⟩
theorem iInf_neBot_iff_of_directed {f : ι → Filter α} [Nonempty α] (hd : Directed (· ≥ ·) f) :
NeBot (iInf f) ↔ ∀ i, NeBot (f i) :=
⟨fun H i => H.mono (iInf_le _ i), iInf_neBot_of_directed hd⟩
/-! #### `principal` equations -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊓ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∩ t) :=
le_antisymm
(by simp only [le_principal_iff, mem_inf_iff]; exact ⟨s, Subset.rfl, t, Subset.rfl, rfl⟩)
(by simp [le_inf_iff, inter_subset_left, inter_subset_right])
@[simp]
theorem sup_principal {s t : Set α} : 𝓟 s ⊔ 𝓟 t = 𝓟 (s ∪ t) :=
Filter.ext fun u => by simp only [union_subset_iff, mem_sup, mem_principal]
@[simp]
theorem iSup_principal {ι : Sort w} {s : ι → Set α} : ⨆ x, 𝓟 (s x) = 𝓟 (⋃ i, s i) :=
Filter.ext fun x => by simp only [mem_iSup, mem_principal, iUnion_subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem principal_eq_bot_iff {s : Set α} : 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ s = ∅ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot.symm.trans <| mem_principal.trans subset_empty_iff
@[simp]
theorem principal_neBot_iff {s : Set α} : NeBot (𝓟 s) ↔ s.Nonempty :=
neBot_iff.trans <| (not_congr principal_eq_bot_iff).trans nonempty_iff_ne_empty.symm
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Nonempty.principal_neBot⟩ := principal_neBot_iff
theorem isCompl_principal (s : Set α) : IsCompl (𝓟 s) (𝓟 sᶜ) :=
IsCompl.of_eq (by rw [inf_principal, inter_compl_self, principal_empty]) <| by
rw [sup_principal, union_compl_self, principal_univ]
theorem mem_inf_principal' {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ tᶜ ∪ s ∈ f := by
simp only [← le_principal_iff, (isCompl_principal s).le_left_iff, disjoint_assoc, inf_principal,
← (isCompl_principal (t ∩ sᶜ)).le_right_iff, compl_inter, compl_compl]
lemma mem_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s t : Set α} : s ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 t ↔ { x | x ∈ t → x ∈ s } ∈ f := by
simp only [mem_inf_principal', imp_iff_not_or, setOf_or, compl_def, setOf_mem_eq]
lemma iSup_inf_principal (f : ι → Filter α) (s : Set α) : ⨆ i, f i ⊓ 𝓟 s = (⨆ i, f i) ⊓ 𝓟 s := by
ext
simp only [mem_iSup, mem_inf_principal]
theorem inf_principal_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} : f ⊓ 𝓟 s = ⊥ ↔ sᶜ ∈ f := by
rw [← empty_mem_iff_bot, mem_inf_principal]
simp only [mem_empty_iff_false, imp_false, compl_def]
theorem mem_of_eq_bot {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (h : f ⊓ 𝓟 sᶜ = ⊥) : s ∈ f := by
rwa [inf_principal_eq_bot, compl_compl] at h
theorem diff_mem_inf_principal_compl {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ f) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ f ⊓ 𝓟 tᶜ :=
inter_mem_inf hs <| mem_principal_self tᶜ
theorem principal_le_iff {s : Set α} {f : Filter α} : 𝓟 s ≤ f ↔ ∀ V ∈ f, s ⊆ V := by
simp_rw [le_def, mem_principal]
end Lattice
@[mono, gcongr]
theorem join_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter (Filter α)} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) : join f₁ ≤ join f₂ := fun _ hs => h hs
/-! ### Eventually -/
theorem eventually_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ { x | P x } ∈ f :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_set {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ s ∈ l :=
Iff.rfl
protected theorem ext' {f₁ f₂ : Filter α}
(h : ∀ p : α → Prop, (∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : f₁ = f₂ :=
Filter.ext h
theorem Eventually.filter_mono {f₁ f₂ : Filter α} (h : f₁ ≤ f₂) {p : α → Prop}
(hp : ∀ᶠ x in f₂, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f₁, p x :=
h hp
theorem eventually_of_mem {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} {U : Set α} (hU : U ∈ f)
(h : ∀ x ∈ U, P x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x :=
mem_of_superset hU h
protected theorem Eventually.and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
f.Eventually p → f.Eventually q → ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x :=
inter_mem
@[simp] theorem eventually_true (f : Filter α) : ∀ᶠ _ in f, True := univ_mem
theorem Eventually.of_forall {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ x, p x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
univ_mem' hp
@[simp]
theorem eventually_false_iff_eq_bot {f : Filter α} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, False) ↔ f = ⊥ :=
empty_mem_iff_bot
@[simp]
theorem eventually_const {f : Filter α} [t : NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∀ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases h : p <;> simp [h, t.ne]
theorem eventually_iff_exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
exists_mem_subset_iff.symm
theorem Eventually.exists_mem {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ v ∈ f, ∀ y ∈ v, p y :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem.1 hp
theorem Eventually.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mp_mem hp hq
theorem Eventually.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
hp.mp (Eventually.of_forall hq)
theorem forall_eventually_of_eventually_forall {f : Filter α} {p : α → β → Prop}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, ∀ y, p x y) : ∀ y, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x y :=
fun y => h.mono fun _ h => h y
@[simp]
theorem eventually_and {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
inter_mem_iff
theorem Eventually.congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h' : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h'.mp (h.mono fun _ hx => hx.mp)
theorem eventually_congr {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun hp => hp.congr h, fun hq => hq.congr <| by simpa only [Iff.comm] using h⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∀ᶠ x in f, q x :=
by_cases (fun h : p => by simp [h]) fun h => by simp [h]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by
simp only [@or_comm _ q, eventually_or_distrib_left]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∀ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_bot {p : α → Prop} : ∀ᶠ x in ⊥, p x :=
⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem eventually_top {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∀ x, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ ∀ᶠ x in g, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∀ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∀ f ∈ fs, ∀ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : ι → Filter α} :
(∀ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∀ b, ∀ᶠ x in fs b, p x :=
mem_iSup
@[simp]
theorem eventually_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∀ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∀ x ∈ a, p x :=
Iff.rfl
theorem Eventually.forall_mem {α : Type*} {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {P : α → Prop}
(hP : ∀ᶠ x in f, P x) (hf : 𝓟 s ≤ f) : ∀ x ∈ s, P x :=
Filter.eventually_principal.mp (hP.filter_mono hf)
theorem eventually_inf {f g : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ g, p x) ↔ ∃ s ∈ f, ∃ t ∈ g, ∀ x ∈ s ∩ t, p x :=
mem_inf_iff_superset
theorem eventually_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x :=
mem_inf_principal
theorem eventually_iff_all_subsets {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ (s : Set α), ∀ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s → p x where
mp h _ := by filter_upwards [h] with _ pa _ using pa
mpr h := by filter_upwards [h univ] with _ pa using pa (by simp)
/-! ### Frequently -/
theorem Eventually.frequently {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
compl_not_mem h
theorem Frequently.of_forall {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x) :
∃ᶠ x in f, p x :=
Eventually.frequently (Eventually.of_forall h)
theorem Frequently.mp {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
mt (fun hq => hq.mp <| hpq.mono fun _ => mt) h
lemma frequently_congr {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x ↔ q x) :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
⟨fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mp), fun h' ↦ h'.mp (h.mono fun _ ↦ Iff.mpr)⟩
theorem Frequently.filter_mono {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) (hle : f ≤ g) :
∃ᶠ x in g, p x :=
mt (fun h' => h'.filter_mono hle) h
theorem Frequently.mono {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (h : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hpq : ∀ x, p x → q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x :=
h.mp (Eventually.of_forall hpq)
theorem Frequently.and_eventually {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∀ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
refine mt (fun h => hq.mp <| h.mono ?_) hp
exact fun x hpq hq hp => hpq ⟨hp, hq⟩
theorem Eventually.and_frequently {p q : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x)
(hq : ∃ᶠ x in f, q x) : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q x := by
simpa only [and_comm] using hq.and_eventually hp
theorem Frequently.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} (hp : ∃ᶠ x in f, p x) : ∃ x, p x := by
by_contra H
replace H : ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := Eventually.of_forall (not_exists.1 H)
exact hp H
theorem Eventually.exists {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] (hp : ∀ᶠ x in f, p x) :
∃ x, p x :=
hp.frequently.exists
lemma frequently_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in l, p x) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 {x | p x}) := by
rw [neBot_iff, Ne, inf_principal_eq_bot]; rfl
lemma frequently_mem_iff_neBot {l : Filter α} {s : Set α} : (∃ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s) ↔ NeBot (l ⊓ 𝓟 s) :=
frequently_iff_neBot
theorem frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ {q : α → Prop}, (∀ᶠ x in f, q x) → ∃ x, p x ∧ q x :=
⟨fun hp _ hq => (hp.and_eventually hq).exists, fun H hp => by
simpa only [and_not_self_iff, exists_false] using H hp⟩
theorem frequently_iff {f : Filter α} {P : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, P x) ↔ ∀ {U}, U ∈ f → ∃ x ∈ U, P x := by
simp only [frequently_iff_forall_eventually_exists_and, @and_comm (P _)]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem not_eventually {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∀ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem not_frequently {p : α → Prop} {f : Filter α} : (¬∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in f, ¬p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_not]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_true_iff_neBot (f : Filter α) : (∃ᶠ _ in f, True) ↔ NeBot f := by
simp [frequently_iff_neBot]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_false (f : Filter α) : ¬∃ᶠ _ in f, False := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_const {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} : (∃ᶠ _ in f, p) ↔ p := by
by_cases p <;> simp [*]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_or_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, ← not_and_or, not_or, eventually_and]
theorem frequently_or_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∨ q x) ↔ p ∨ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp
theorem frequently_or_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∨ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ q := by simp
theorem frequently_imp_distrib {f : Filter α} {p q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q x) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp [imp_iff_not_or]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_left {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p → q x) ↔ p → ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by simp [frequently_imp_distrib]
theorem frequently_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} [NeBot f] {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∀ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [frequently_imp_distrib, frequently_const]
theorem eventually_imp_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in f, p x → q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) → q := by
simp only [imp_iff_not_or, eventually_or_distrib_right, not_frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_left {f : Filter α} {p : Prop} {q : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p ∧ q x) ↔ p ∧ ∃ᶠ x in f, q x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_and, eventually_imp_distrib_left, Classical.not_imp]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_and_distrib_right {f : Filter α} {p : α → Prop} {q : Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f, p x ∧ q) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∧ q := by
simp only [@and_comm _ q, frequently_and_distrib_left]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_bot {p : α → Prop} : ¬∃ᶠ x in ⊥, p x := by simp
@[simp]
theorem frequently_top {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in ⊤, p x) ↔ ∃ x, p x := by simp [Filter.Frequently]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_principal {a : Set α} {p : α → Prop} : (∃ᶠ x in 𝓟 a, p x) ↔ ∃ x ∈ a, p x := by
simp [Filter.Frequently, not_forall]
theorem frequently_inf_principal {f : Filter α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊓ 𝓟 s, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in f, x ∈ s ∧ p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_inf_principal, not_and]
alias ⟨Frequently.of_inf_principal, Frequently.inf_principal⟩ := frequently_inf_principal
theorem frequently_sup {p : α → Prop} {f g : Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in f ⊔ g, p x) ↔ (∃ᶠ x in f, p x) ∨ ∃ᶠ x in g, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_sup, not_and_or]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_sSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : Set (Filter α)} :
(∃ᶠ x in sSup fs, p x) ↔ ∃ f ∈ fs, ∃ᶠ x in f, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, not_forall, eventually_sSup, exists_prop]
@[simp]
theorem frequently_iSup {p : α → Prop} {fs : β → Filter α} :
(∃ᶠ x in ⨆ b, fs b, p x) ↔ ∃ b, ∃ᶠ x in fs b, p x := by
simp only [Filter.Frequently, eventually_iSup, not_forall]
theorem Eventually.choice {r : α → β → Prop} {l : Filter α} [l.NeBot] (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, ∃ y, r x y) :
∃ f : α → β, ∀ᶠ x in l, r x (f x) := by
haveI : Nonempty β := let ⟨_, hx⟩ := h.exists; hx.nonempty
choose! f hf using fun x (hx : ∃ y, r x y) => hx
exact ⟨f, h.mono hf⟩
lemma skolem {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, Nonempty (α i)]
{P : ∀ i : ι, α i → Prop} {F : Filter ι} :
(∀ᶠ i in F, ∃ b, P i b) ↔ ∃ b : (Π i, α i), ∀ᶠ i in F, P i (b i) := by
classical
refine ⟨fun H ↦ ?_, fun ⟨b, hb⟩ ↦ hb.mp (.of_forall fun x a ↦ ⟨_, a⟩)⟩
refine ⟨fun i ↦ if h : ∃ b, P i b then h.choose else Nonempty.some inferInstance, ?_⟩
filter_upwards [H] with i hi
exact dif_pos hi ▸ hi.choose_spec
/-!
### Relation “eventually equal”
-/
section EventuallyEq
variable {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.eventually (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x = g x := h
@[simp] lemma eventuallyEq_top : f =ᶠ[⊤] g ↔ f = g := by simp [EventuallyEq, funext_iff]
theorem EventuallyEq.rw {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (p : α → β → Prop)
(hf : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (f x)) : ∀ᶠ x in l, p x (g x) :=
hf.congr <| h.mono fun _ hx => hx ▸ Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_set {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s ↔ x ∈ t :=
eventually_congr <| Eventually.of_forall fun _ ↦ eq_iff_iff
alias ⟨EventuallyEq.mem_iff, Eventually.set_eq⟩ := eventuallyEq_set
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_univ {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] univ ↔ s ∈ l := by
simp [eventuallyEq_set]
theorem EventuallyEq.exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
Eventually.exists_mem h
theorem eventuallyEq_of_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ l) (h : EqOn f g s) :
f =ᶠ[l] g :=
eventually_of_mem hs h
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_exists_mem {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∃ s ∈ l, EqOn f g s :=
eventually_iff_exists_mem
theorem EventuallyEq.filter_mono {l l' : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h₂ : l' ≤ l) :
f =ᶠ[l'] g :=
h₂ h₁
@[refl, simp]
theorem EventuallyEq.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
Eventually.of_forall fun _ => rfl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.rfl {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} : f =ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.refl l f
theorem EventuallyEq.of_eq {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f = g) : f =ᶠ[l] g := h ▸ .rfl
alias _root_.Eq.eventuallyEq := EventuallyEq.of_eq
@[symm]
theorem EventuallyEq.symm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) : g =ᶠ[l] f :=
H.mono fun _ => Eq.symm
lemma eventuallyEq_comm {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} : f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f := ⟨.symm, .symm⟩
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.rw (fun x y => f x = y) H₁
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_left {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f =ᶠ[l] h ↔ g =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨H.symm.trans, H.trans⟩
theorem EventuallyEq.congr_right {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (H : g =ᶠ[l] h) :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f =ᶠ[l] h :=
⟨(·.trans H), (·.trans H.symm)⟩
instance {l : Filter α} :
Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans
theorem EventuallyEq.prodMk {l} {f f' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') {g g' : α → γ} (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
(fun x => (f x, g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (f' x, g' x) :=
hf.mp <|
hg.mono <| by
intros
simp only [*]
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias EventuallyEq.prod_mk := EventuallyEq.prodMk
-- See `EventuallyEq.comp_tendsto` further below for a similar statement w.r.t.
-- composition on the right.
theorem EventuallyEq.fun_comp {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (H : f =ᶠ[l] g) (h : β → γ) :
h ∘ f =ᶠ[l] h ∘ g :=
H.mono fun _ hx => congr_arg h hx
theorem EventuallyEq.comp₂ {δ} {f f' : α → β} {g g' : α → γ} {l} (Hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (h : β → γ → δ)
(Hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => h (f x) (g x)) =ᶠ[l] fun x => h (f' x) (g' x) :=
(Hf.prodMk Hg).fun_comp (uncurry h)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.mul [Mul β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x * f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x * g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· * ·) h'
@[to_additive const_smul]
theorem EventuallyEq.pow_const {γ} [Pow β γ] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (c : γ) :
(fun x => f x ^ c) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x ^ c :=
h.fun_comp (· ^ c)
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.inv [Inv β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
(fun x => (f x)⁻¹) =ᶠ[l] fun x => (g x)⁻¹ :=
h.fun_comp Inv.inv
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.div [Div β] {f f' g g' : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g)
(h' : f' =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x / f' x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => g x / g' x :=
h.comp₂ (· / ·) h'
attribute [to_additive] EventuallyEq.const_smul
@[to_additive]
theorem EventuallyEq.smul {𝕜} [SMul 𝕜 β] {l : Filter α} {f f' : α → 𝕜} {g g' : α → β}
(hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x • g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x • g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· • ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.sup [Max β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊔ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊔ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊔ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.inf [Min β] {l : Filter α} {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f')
(hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') : (fun x => f x ⊓ g x) =ᶠ[l] fun x => f' x ⊓ g' x :=
hf.comp₂ (· ⊓ ·) hg
theorem EventuallyEq.preimage {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) (s : Set β) :
f ⁻¹' s =ᶠ[l] g ⁻¹' s :=
h.fun_comp s
theorem EventuallyEq.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∧ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h.comp₂ (· ∨ ·) h'
theorem EventuallyEq.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) :
(sᶜ : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (tᶜ : Set α) :=
h.fun_comp Not
theorem EventuallyEq.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') :
(s \ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
protected theorem EventuallyEq.symmDiff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α}
(h : s =ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' =ᶠ[l] t') : (s ∆ s' : Set α) =ᶠ[l] (t ∆ t' : Set α) :=
(h.diff h').union (h'.diff h)
theorem eventuallyEq_empty {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} : s =ᶠ[l] (∅ : Set α) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∉ s :=
eventuallyEq_set.trans <| by simp
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_left {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] s ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → x ∈ t := by
simp only [eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, and_iff_left_iff_imp]
theorem inter_eventuallyEq_right {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
(s ∩ t : Set α) =ᶠ[l] t ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ t → x ∈ s := by
rw [inter_comm, inter_eventuallyEq_left]
@[simp]
theorem eventuallyEq_principal {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g ↔ EqOn f g s :=
Iff.rfl
theorem eventuallyEq_inf_principal_iff {F : Filter α} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[F ⊓ 𝓟 s] g ↔ ∀ᶠ x in F, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem EventuallyEq.sub_eq [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) :
f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 := by simpa using ((EventuallyEq.refl l f).sub h).symm
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_sub [AddGroup β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f - g =ᶠ[l] 0 :=
⟨fun h => h.sub_eq, fun h => by simpa using h.add (EventuallyEq.refl l g)⟩
theorem eventuallyEq_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x = g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
section LE
variable [LE β] {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (H : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
H.mp <| hg.mp <| hf.mono fun x hf hg H => by rwa [hf, hg] at H
theorem eventuallyLE_congr {f f' g g' : α → β} (hf : f =ᶠ[l] f') (hg : g =ᶠ[l] g') :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ f' ≤ᶠ[l] g' :=
⟨fun H => H.congr hf hg, fun H => H.congr hf.symm hg.symm⟩
theorem eventuallyLE_iff_all_subsets {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} :
f ≤ᶠ[l] g ↔ ∀ s : Set α, ∀ᶠ x in l, x ∈ s → f x ≤ g x :=
eventually_iff_all_subsets
end LE
section Preorder
variable [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
theorem EventuallyEq.le (h : f =ᶠ[l] g) : f ≤ᶠ[l] g :=
h.mono fun _ => le_of_eq
@[refl]
theorem EventuallyLE.refl (l : Filter α) (f : α → β) : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyEq.rfl.le
theorem EventuallyLE.rfl : f ≤ᶠ[l] f :=
EventuallyLE.refl l f
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₂.mp <| H₁.mono fun _ => le_trans
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyEq.trans_le (H₁ : f =ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.le.trans H₂
instance : Trans ((· =ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyEq.trans_le
@[trans]
theorem EventuallyLE.trans_eq (H₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) (H₂ : g =ᶠ[l] h) : f ≤ᶠ[l] h :=
H₁.trans H₂.le
instance : Trans ((· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) : (α → β) → (α → β) → Prop) (· =ᶠ[l] ·) (· ≤ᶠ[l] ·) where
trans := EventuallyLE.trans_eq
end Preorder
variable {l : Filter α}
theorem EventuallyLE.antisymm [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h₁ : f ≤ᶠ[l] g)
(h₂ : g ≤ᶠ[l] f) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h₂.mp <| h₁.mono fun _ => le_antisymm
theorem eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} :
f =ᶠ[l] g ↔ f ≤ᶠ[l] g ∧ g ≤ᶠ[l] f := by
simp only [EventuallyEq, EventuallyLE, le_antisymm_iff, eventually_and]
theorem EventuallyLE.le_iff_eq [PartialOrder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : f ≤ᶠ[l] g) :
g ≤ᶠ[l] f ↔ g =ᶠ[l] f :=
⟨fun h' => h'.antisymm h, EventuallyEq.le⟩
theorem Eventually.ne_of_lt [Preorder β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) :
∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ g x :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne
theorem Eventually.ne_top_of_lt [Preorder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < g x) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.ne_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_of_ne [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β}
(h : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤) : ∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤ :=
h.mono fun _ hx => hx.lt_top
theorem Eventually.lt_top_iff_ne_top [PartialOrder β] [OrderTop β] {l : Filter α} {f : α → β} :
(∀ᶠ x in l, f x < ⊤) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in l, f x ≠ ⊤ :=
⟨Eventually.ne_of_lt, Eventually.lt_top_of_ne⟩
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.inter {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∩ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∩ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => And.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.union {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : s' ≤ᶠ[l] t') :
(s ∪ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t ∪ t' : Set α) :=
h'.mp <| h.mono fun _ => Or.imp
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.compl {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) :
(tᶜ : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (sᶜ : Set α) :=
h.mono fun _ => mt
@[mono]
theorem EventuallyLE.diff {s t s' t' : Set α} {l : Filter α} (h : s ≤ᶠ[l] t) (h' : t' ≤ᶠ[l] s') :
(s \ s' : Set α) ≤ᶠ[l] (t \ t' : Set α) :=
h.inter h'.compl
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ t ∈ l ⊓ 𝓟 s :=
eventually_inf_principal.symm
theorem set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s ≤ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s ≤ l ⊓ 𝓟 t :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal.trans <| by
simp only [le_inf_iff, inf_le_left, true_and, le_principal_iff]
theorem set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal {s t : Set α} {l : Filter α} :
s =ᶠ[l] t ↔ l ⊓ 𝓟 s = l ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
simp only [eventuallyLE_antisymm_iff, le_antisymm_iff, set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le]
theorem EventuallyLE.sup [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f₁ f₂ g₁ g₂ : α → β} (hf : f₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂)
(hg : g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] g₂) : f₁ ⊔ g₁ ≤ᶠ[l] f₂ ⊔ g₂ := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using sup_le_sup hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.sup_le [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β} (hf : f ≤ᶠ[l] h)
(hg : g ≤ᶠ[l] h) : f ⊔ g ≤ᶠ[l] h := by
filter_upwards [hf, hg] with x hfx hgx using _root_.sup_le hfx hgx
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_left [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hf : h ≤ᶠ[l] f) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hf.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_left
theorem EventuallyLE.le_sup_of_le_right [SemilatticeSup β] {l : Filter α} {f g h : α → β}
(hg : h ≤ᶠ[l] g) : h ≤ᶠ[l] f ⊔ g :=
hg.mono fun _ => _root_.le_sup_of_le_right
theorem join_le {f : Filter (Filter α)} {l : Filter α} (h : ∀ᶠ m in f, m ≤ l) : join f ≤ l :=
fun _ hs => h.mono fun _ hm => hm hs
end EventuallyEq
end Filter
open Filter
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq {α β} {s : Set α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s) : f =ᶠ[𝓟 s] g :=
h
theorem Set.EqOn.eventuallyEq_of_mem {α β} {s : Set α} {l : Filter α} {f g : α → β} (h : EqOn f g s)
(hl : s ∈ l) : f =ᶠ[l] g :=
h.eventuallyEq.filter_mono <| Filter.le_principal_iff.2 hl
theorem HasSubset.Subset.eventuallyLE {α} {l : Filter α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : s ≤ᶠ[l] t :=
Filter.Eventually.of_forall h
variable {α β : Type*} {F : Filter α} {G : Filter β}
namespace Filter
lemma compl_mem_comk {p : Set α → Prop} {he hmono hunion s} :
sᶜ ∈ comk p he hmono hunion ↔ p s := by
simp
end Filter
| Mathlib/Order/Filter/Basic.lean | 1,865 | 1,868 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Dagur Asgeirsson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Dagur Asgeirsson, Leonardo de Moura
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Basic
/-!
# Indicator function valued in bool
See also `Set.indicator` and `Set.piecewise`.
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Bool
namespace Set
variable {α : Type*} (s : Set α)
/-- `boolIndicator` maps `x` to `true` if `x ∈ s`, else to `false` -/
noncomputable def boolIndicator (x : α) :=
@ite _ (x ∈ s) (Classical.propDecidable _) true false
theorem mem_iff_boolIndicator (x : α) : x ∈ s ↔ s.boolIndicator x = true := by
| unfold boolIndicator
split_ifs with h <;> simp [h]
| Mathlib/Data/Set/BoolIndicator.lean | 27 | 29 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Computability.Halting
import Mathlib.Computability.TuringMachine
import Mathlib.Data.Num.Lemmas
import Mathlib.Tactic.DeriveFintype
import Mathlib.Computability.TMConfig
/-!
# Modelling partial recursive functions using Turing machines
The files `TMConfig` and `TMToPartrec` define a simplified basis for partial recursive functions,
and a `Turing.TM2` model
Turing machine for evaluating these functions. This amounts to a constructive proof that every
`Partrec` function can be evaluated by a Turing machine.
## Main definitions
* `PartrecToTM2.tr`: A TM2 turing machine which can evaluate `code` programs
-/
open List (Vector)
open Function (update)
open Relation
namespace Turing
/-!
## Simulating sequentialized partial recursive functions in TM2
At this point we have a sequential model of partial recursive functions: the `Cfg` type and
`step : Cfg → Option Cfg` function from `TMConfig.lean`. The key feature of this model is that
it does a finite amount of computation (in fact, an amount which is statically bounded by the size
of the program) between each step, and no individual step can diverge (unlike the compositional
semantics, where every sub-part of the computation is potentially divergent). So we can utilize the
same techniques as in the other TM simulations in `Computability.TuringMachine` to prove that
each step corresponds to a finite number of steps in a lower level model. (We don't prove it here,
but in anticipation of the complexity class P, the simulation is actually polynomial-time as well.)
The target model is `Turing.TM2`, which has a fixed finite set of stacks, a bit of local storage,
with programs selected from a potentially infinite (but finitely accessible) set of program
positions, or labels `Λ`, each of which executes a finite sequence of basic stack commands.
For this program we will need four stacks, each on an alphabet `Γ'` like so:
inductive Γ' | consₗ | cons | bit0 | bit1
We represent a number as a bit sequence, lists of numbers by putting `cons` after each element, and
lists of lists of natural numbers by putting `consₗ` after each list. For example:
0 ~> []
1 ~> [bit1]
6 ~> [bit0, bit1, bit1]
[1, 2] ~> [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons]
[[], [1, 2]] ~> [consₗ, bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ]
The four stacks are `main`, `rev`, `aux`, `stack`. In normal mode, `main` contains the input to the
current program (a `List ℕ`) and `stack` contains data (a `List (List ℕ)`) associated to the
current continuation, and in `ret` mode `main` contains the value that is being passed to the
continuation and `stack` contains the data for the continuation. The `rev` and `aux` stacks are
usually empty; `rev` is used to store reversed data when e.g. moving a value from one stack to
another, while `aux` is used as a temporary for a `main`/`stack` swap that happens during `cons₁`
evaluation.
The only local store we need is `Option Γ'`, which stores the result of the last pop
operation. (Most of our working data are natural numbers, which are too large to fit in the local
store.)
The continuations from the previous section are data-carrying, containing all the values that have
been computed and are awaiting other arguments. In order to have only a finite number of
continuations appear in the program so that they can be used in machine states, we separate the
data part (anything with type `List ℕ`) from the `Cont` type, producing a `Cont'` type that lacks
this information. The data is kept on the `stack` stack.
Because we want to have subroutines for e.g. moving an entire stack to another place, we use an
infinite inductive type `Λ'` so that we can execute a program and then return to do something else
without having to define too many different kinds of intermediate states. (We must nevertheless
prove that only finitely many labels are accessible.) The labels are:
* `move p k₁ k₂ q`: move elements from stack `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds of the value being moved.
The last element, that fails `p`, is placed in neither stack but left in the local store.
At the end of the operation, `k₂` will have the elements of `k₁` in reverse order. Then do `q`.
* `clear p k q`: delete elements from stack `k` until `p` is true. Like `move`, the last element is
left in the local storage. Then do `q`.
* `copy q`: Move all elements from `rev` to both `main` and `stack` (in reverse order),
then do `q`. That is, it takes `(a, b, c, d)` to `(b.reverse ++ a, [], c, b.reverse ++ d)`.
* `push k f q`: push `f s`, where `s` is the local store, to stack `k`, then do `q`. This is a
duplicate of the `push` instruction that is part of the TM2 model, but by having a subroutine
just for this purpose we can build up programs to execute inside a `goto` statement, where we
have the flexibility to be general recursive.
* `read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')`: go to state `f s` where `s` is the local store. Again this is only
here for convenience.
* `succ q`: perform a successor operation. Assuming `[n]` is encoded on `main` before,
`[n+1]` will be on main after. This implements successor for binary natural numbers.
* `pred q₁ q₂`: perform a predecessor operation or `case` statement. If `[]` is encoded on
`main` before, then we transition to `q₁` with `[]` on main; if `(0 :: v)` is on `main` before
then `v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₁`; and if `(n+1 :: v)` is on `main`
before then `n :: v` will be on `main` after and we transition to `q₂`.
* `ret k`: call continuation `k`. Each continuation has its own interpretation of the data in
`stack` and sets up the data for the next continuation.
* `ret (cons₁ fs k)`: `v :: KData` on `stack` and `ns` on `main`, and the next step expects
`v` on `main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`. So we have to do a little dance here with six
reverse-moves using the `aux` stack to perform a three-point swap, each of which involves two
reversals.
* `ret (cons₂ k)`: `ns :: KData` is on `stack` and `v` is on `main`, and we have to put
`ns.headI :: v` on `main` and `KData` on `stack`. This is done using the `head` subroutine.
* `ret (fix f k)`: This stores no data, so we just check if `main` starts with `0` and
if so, remove it and call `k`, otherwise `clear` the first value and call `f`.
* `ret halt`: the stack is empty, and `main` has the output. Do nothing and halt.
In addition to these basic states, we define some additional subroutines that are used in the
above:
* `push'`, `peek'`, `pop'` are special versions of the builtins that use the local store to supply
inputs and outputs.
* `unrev`: special case `move false rev main` to move everything from `rev` back to `main`. Used as
a cleanup operation in several functions.
* `moveExcl p k₁ k₂ q`: same as `move` but pushes the last value read back onto the source stack.
* `move₂ p k₁ k₂ q`: double `move`, so that the result comes out in the right order at the target
stack. Implemented as `moveExcl p k rev; move false rev k₂`. Assumes that neither `k₁` nor `k₂`
is `rev` and `rev` is initially empty.
* `head k q`: get the first natural number from stack `k` and reverse-move it to `rev`, then clear
the rest of the list at `k` and then `unrev` to reverse-move the head value to `main`. This is
used with `k = main` to implement regular `head`, i.e. if `v` is on `main` before then `[v.headI]`
will be on `main` after; and also with `k = stack` for the `cons` operation, which has `v` on
`main` and `ns :: KData` on `stack`, and results in `KData` on `stack` and `ns.headI :: v` on
`main`.
* `trNormal` is the main entry point, defining states that perform a given `code` computation.
It mostly just dispatches to functions written above.
The main theorem of this section is `tr_eval`, which asserts that for each that for each code `c`,
the state `init c v` steps to `halt v'` in finitely many steps if and only if
`Code.eval c v = some v'`.
-/
namespace PartrecToTM2
section
open ToPartrec
/-- The alphabet for the stacks in the program. `bit0` and `bit1` are used to represent `ℕ` values
as lists of binary digits, `cons` is used to separate `List ℕ` values, and `consₗ` is used to
separate `List (List ℕ)` values. See the section documentation. -/
inductive Γ'
| consₗ
| cons
| bit0
| bit1
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited, Fintype
/-- The four stacks used by the program. `main` is used to store the input value in `trNormal`
mode and the output value in `Λ'.ret` mode, while `stack` is used to keep all the data for the
continuations. `rev` is used to store reversed lists when transferring values between stacks, and
`aux` is only used once in `cons₁`. See the section documentation. -/
inductive K'
| main
| rev
| aux
| stack
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
open K'
/-- Continuations as in `ToPartrec.Cont` but with the data removed. This is done because we want
the set of all continuations in the program to be finite (so that it can ultimately be encoded into
the finite state machine of a Turing machine), but a continuation can handle a potentially infinite
number of data values during execution. -/
inductive Cont'
| halt
| cons₁ : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| cons₂ : Cont' → Cont'
| comp : Code → Cont' → Cont'
| fix : Code → Cont' → Cont'
deriving DecidableEq, Inhabited
/-- The set of program positions. We make extensive use of inductive types here to let us describe
"subroutines"; for example `clear p k q` is a program that clears stack `k`, then does `q` where
`q` is another label. In order to prevent this from resulting in an infinite number of distinct
accessible states, we are careful to be non-recursive (although loops are okay). See the section
documentation for a description of all the programs. -/
inductive Λ'
| move (p : Γ' → Bool) (k₁ k₂ : K') (q : Λ')
| clear (p : Γ' → Bool) (k : K') (q : Λ')
| copy (q : Λ')
| push (k : K') (s : Option Γ' → Option Γ') (q : Λ')
| read (f : Option Γ' → Λ')
| succ (q : Λ')
| pred (q₁ q₂ : Λ')
| ret (k : Cont')
compile_inductive% Code
compile_inductive% Cont'
compile_inductive% K'
compile_inductive% Λ'
instance Λ'.instInhabited : Inhabited Λ' :=
⟨Λ'.ret Cont'.halt⟩
instance Λ'.instDecidableEq : DecidableEq Λ' := fun a b => by
induction a generalizing b <;> cases b <;> first
| apply Decidable.isFalse; rintro ⟨⟨⟩⟩; done
| exact decidable_of_iff' _ (by simp [funext_iff]; rfl)
/-- The type of TM2 statements used by this machine. -/
def Stmt' :=
TM2.Stmt (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
/-- The type of TM2 configurations used by this machine. -/
def Cfg' :=
TM2.Cfg (fun _ : K' => Γ') Λ' (Option Γ') deriving Inhabited
open TM2.Stmt
/-- A predicate that detects the end of a natural number, either `Γ'.cons` or `Γ'.consₗ` (or
implicitly the end of the list), for use in predicate-taking functions like `move` and `clear`. -/
@[simp]
def natEnd : Γ' → Bool
| Γ'.consₗ => true
| Γ'.cons => true
| _ => false
attribute [nolint simpNF] natEnd.eq_3
/-- Pop a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def pop' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
pop k fun _ v => v
/-- Peek a value from the stack and place the result in local store. -/
@[simp]
def peek' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
peek k fun _ v => v
/-- Push the value in the local store to the given stack. -/
@[simp]
def push' (k : K') : Stmt' → Stmt' :=
push k fun x => x.iget
/-- Move everything from the `rev` stack to the `main` stack (reversed). -/
def unrev :=
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev main
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` while `p` holds, with the last element being left on `k₁`. -/
def moveExcl (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ <| Λ'.push k₁ id q
/-- Move elements from `k₁` to `k₂` without reversion, by performing a double move via the `rev`
stack. -/
def move₂ (p k₁ k₂ q) :=
moveExcl p k₁ rev <| Λ'.move (fun _ => false) rev k₂ q
/-- Assuming `trList v` is on the front of stack `k`, remove it, and push `v.headI` onto `main`.
See the section documentation. -/
def head (k : K') (q : Λ') : Λ' :=
Λ'.move natEnd k rev <|
(Λ'.push rev fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <|
Λ'.read fun s =>
(if s = some Γ'.consₗ then id else Λ'.clear (fun x => x = Γ'.consₗ) k) <| unrev q
/-- The program that evaluates code `c` with continuation `k`. This expects an initial state where
`trList v` is on `main`, `trContStack k` is on `stack`, and `aux` and `rev` are empty.
See the section documentation for details. -/
@[simp]
def trNormal : Code → Cont' → Λ'
| Code.zero', k => (Λ'.push main fun _ => some Γ'.cons) <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.succ, k => head main <| Λ'.succ <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.tail, k => Λ'.clear natEnd main <| Λ'.ret k
| Code.cons f fs, k =>
(Λ'.push stack fun _ => some Γ'.consₗ) <|
Λ'.move (fun _ => false) main rev <| Λ'.copy <| trNormal f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)
| Code.comp f g, k => trNormal g (Cont'.comp f k)
| Code.case f g, k => Λ'.pred (trNormal f k) (trNormal g k)
| Code.fix f, k => trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
/-- The main program. See the section documentation for details. -/
def tr : Λ' → Stmt'
| Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q =>
pop' k₁ <|
branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)
| Λ'.push k f q =>
branch (fun s => (f s).isSome) ((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q)
(goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.read q => goto q
| Λ'.clear p k q =>
pop' k <| branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)
| Λ'.copy q =>
pop' rev <|
branch Option.isSome (push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)
| Λ'.succ q =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1) ((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ =>
pop' main <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =>
goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k) => goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k) => goto fun _ => trNormal f k
| Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k) =>
pop' main <|
goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)
| Λ'.ret Cont'.halt => (load fun _ => none) <| halt
@[simp]
theorem tr_move (p k₁ k₂ q) : tr (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q) =
pop' k₁ (branch (fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q)
(push' k₂ <| goto fun _ => Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_push (k f q) : tr (Λ'.push k f q) = branch (fun s => (f s).isSome)
((push k fun s => (f s).iget) <| goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => q) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_read (q) : tr (Λ'.read q) = goto q := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_clear (p k q) : tr (Λ'.clear p k q) = pop' k (branch
(fun s => s.elim true p) (goto fun _ => q) (goto fun _ => Λ'.clear p k q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_copy (q) : tr (Λ'.copy q) = pop' rev (branch Option.isSome
(push' main <| push' stack <| goto fun _ => Λ'.copy q) (goto fun _ => q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_succ (q) : tr (Λ'.succ q) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit1)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.succ q) <|
branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.cons)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.cons) <| (push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)
((push main fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => unrev q)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_pred (q₁ q₂) : tr (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) = pop' main (branch (fun s => s = some Γ'.bit0)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit1) <| goto fun _ => Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => q₁)
(peek' main <|
branch (fun s => natEnd s.iget) (goto fun _ => unrev q₂)
((push rev fun _ => Γ'.bit0) <| goto fun _ => unrev q₂))) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₁ (fs k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₁ fs k)) = goto fun _ =>
move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_cons₂ (k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.cons₂ k)) =
goto fun _ => head stack <| Λ'.ret k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_comp (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.comp f k)) = goto fun _ => trNormal f k := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_fix (f k) : tr (Λ'.ret (Cont'.fix f k)) = pop' main (goto fun s =>
cond (natEnd s.iget) (Λ'.ret k) <| Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tr_ret_halt : tr (Λ'.ret Cont'.halt) = (load fun _ => none) halt := rfl
/-- Translating a `Cont` continuation to a `Cont'` continuation simply entails dropping all the
data. This data is instead encoded in `trContStack` in the configuration. -/
def trCont : Cont → Cont'
| Cont.halt => Cont'.halt
| Cont.cons₁ c _ k => Cont'.cons₁ c (trCont k)
| Cont.cons₂ _ k => Cont'.cons₂ (trCont k)
| Cont.comp c k => Cont'.comp c (trCont k)
| Cont.fix c k => Cont'.fix c (trCont k)
/-- We use `PosNum` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. A natural number is
represented as a little-endian list of `bit0` and `bit1` elements:
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
In particular, this representation guarantees no trailing `bit0`'s at the end of the list. -/
def trPosNum : PosNum → List Γ'
| PosNum.one => [Γ'.bit1]
| PosNum.bit0 n => Γ'.bit0 :: trPosNum n
| PosNum.bit1 n => Γ'.bit1 :: trPosNum n
/-- We use `Num` to define the translation of binary natural numbers. Positive numbers are
translated using `trPosNum`, and `trNum 0 = []`. So there are never any trailing `bit0`'s in
a translated `Num`.
0 = []
1 = [bit1]
2 = [bit0, bit1]
3 = [bit1, bit1]
4 = [bit0, bit0, bit1]
-/
def trNum : Num → List Γ'
| Num.zero => []
| Num.pos n => trPosNum n
/-- Because we use binary encoding, we define `trNat` in terms of `trNum`, using `Num`, which are
binary natural numbers. (We could also use `Nat.binaryRecOn`, but `Num` and `PosNum` make for
easy inductions.) -/
def trNat (n : ℕ) : List Γ' :=
trNum n
@[simp]
theorem trNat_zero : trNat 0 = [] := by rw [trNat, Nat.cast_zero]; rfl
theorem trNat_default : trNat default = [] :=
trNat_zero
/-- Lists are translated with a `cons` after each encoded number.
For example:
[] = []
[0] = [cons]
[1] = [bit1, cons]
[6, 0] = [bit0, bit1, bit1, cons, cons]
-/
@[simp]
def trList : List ℕ → List Γ'
| [] => []
| n::ns => trNat n ++ Γ'.cons :: trList ns
/-- Lists of lists are translated with a `consₗ` after each encoded list.
For example:
[] = []
[[]] = [consₗ]
[[], []] = [consₗ, consₗ]
[[0]] = [cons, consₗ]
[[1, 2], [0]] = [bit1, cons, bit0, bit1, cons, consₗ, cons, consₗ]
-/
@[simp]
def trLList : List (List ℕ) → List Γ'
| [] => []
| l::ls => trList l ++ Γ'.consₗ :: trLList ls
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
@[simp]
def contStack : Cont → List (List ℕ)
| Cont.halt => []
| Cont.cons₁ _ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.cons₂ ns k => ns :: contStack k
| Cont.comp _ k => contStack k
| Cont.fix _ k => contStack k
/-- The data part of a continuation is a list of lists, which is encoded on the `stack` stack
using `trLList`. -/
def trContStack (k : Cont) :=
trLList (contStack k)
/-- This is the nondependent eliminator for `K'`, but we use it specifically here in order to
represent the stack data as four lists rather than as a function `K' → List Γ'`, because this makes
rewrites easier. The theorems `K'.elim_update_main` et. al. show how such a function is updated
after an `update` to one of the components. -/
def K'.elim (a b c d : List Γ') : K' → List Γ'
| K'.main => a
| K'.rev => b
| K'.aux => c
| K'.stack => d
-- The equation lemma of `elim` simplifies to `match` structures.
theorem K'.elim_main (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.main = a := rfl
theorem K'.elim_rev (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.rev = b := rfl
theorem K'.elim_aux (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.aux = c := rfl
theorem K'.elim_stack (a b c d) : K'.elim a b c d K'.stack = d := rfl
attribute [simp] K'.elim
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_main {a b c d a'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) main a' = K'.elim a' b c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_rev {a b c d b'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) rev b' = K'.elim a b' c d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_aux {a b c d c'} : update (K'.elim a b c d) aux c' = K'.elim a b c' d := by
funext x; cases x <;> rfl
@[simp]
theorem K'.elim_update_stack {a b c d d'} :
update (K'.elim a b c d) stack d' = K'.elim a b c d' := by funext x; cases x <;> rfl
/-- The halting state corresponding to a `List ℕ` output value. -/
def halt (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨none, none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
/-- The `Cfg` states map to `Cfg'` states almost one to one, except that in normal operation the
local store contains an arbitrary garbage value. To make the final theorem cleaner we explicitly
clear it in the halt state so that there is exactly one configuration corresponding to output `v`.
-/
def TrCfg : Cfg → Cfg' → Prop
| Cfg.ret k v, c' =>
∃ s, c' = ⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩
| Cfg.halt v, c' => c' = halt v
/-- This could be a general list definition, but it is also somewhat specialized to this
application. `splitAtPred p L` will search `L` for the first element satisfying `p`.
If it is found, say `L = l₁ ++ a :: l₂` where `a` satisfies `p` but `l₁` does not, then it returns
`(l₁, some a, l₂)`. Otherwise, if there is no such element, it returns `(L, none, [])`. -/
def splitAtPred {α} (p : α → Bool) : List α → List α × Option α × List α
| [] => ([], none, [])
| a :: as =>
cond (p a) ([], some a, as) <|
let ⟨l₁, o, l₂⟩ := splitAtPred p as
⟨a::l₁, o, l₂⟩
theorem splitAtPred_eq {α} (p : α → Bool) :
∀ L l₁ o l₂,
(∀ x ∈ l₁, p x = false) →
Option.elim' (L = l₁ ∧ l₂ = []) (fun a => p a = true ∧ L = l₁ ++ a::l₂) o →
splitAtPred p L = (l₁, o, l₂)
| [], _, none, _, _, ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ => rfl
| [], l₁, some o, l₂, _, ⟨_, h₃⟩ => by simp at h₃
| a :: L, l₁, o, l₂, h₁, h₂ => by
rw [splitAtPred]
have IH := splitAtPred_eq p L
rcases o with - | o
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨⟨⟩, rfl⟩
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH L none [] _ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩]
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
· rcases l₁ with - | ⟨a', l₁⟩ <;> rcases h₂ with ⟨h₂, ⟨⟩⟩
· rw [h₂, cond]
rw [h₁ a (List.Mem.head _), cond, IH l₁ (some o) l₂ _ ⟨h₂, _⟩] <;> try rfl
exact fun x h => h₁ x (List.Mem.tail _ h)
theorem splitAtPred_false {α} (L : List α) : splitAtPred (fun _ => false) L = (L, none, []) :=
splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ _ _ (fun _ _ => rfl) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
theorem move_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ k₂)
(e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.move p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, o, update (update S k₁ L₂) k₂ (L₁.reverseAux (S k₂))⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· rw [(_ : [].reverseAux _ = _), Function.update_eq_self]
swap
· rw [Function.update_of_ne h₁.symm, List.reverseAux_nil]
refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux]
revert e; rcases S k₁ with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons, Option.iget_some] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
simp only [e]
rfl
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', Option.elim, TM2.stepAux, push']
rcases e₁ : S k₁ with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, ne_eq, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update (update S k₁ Sk) k₂ (a :: S k₂)) _ using 2 <;>
simp [Function.update_of_ne, h₁, h₁.symm, e₃, List.reverseAux]
simp [Function.update_comm h₁.symm]
theorem unrev_ok {q s} {S : K' → List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (unrev q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S rev []) main (List.reverseAux (S rev) (S main))⟩ :=
move_ok (by decide) <| splitAtPred_false _
theorem move₂_ok {p k₁ k₂ q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (h₁ : k₁ ≠ rev ∧ k₂ ≠ rev ∧ k₁ ≠ k₂)
(h₂ : S rev = []) (e : splitAtPred p (S k₁) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (move₂ p k₁ k₂ q), s, S⟩
⟨some q, none, update (update S k₁ (o.elim id List.cons L₂)) k₂ (L₁ ++ S k₂)⟩ := by
refine (move_ok h₁.1 e).trans (TransGen.head rfl ?_)
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, id_eq, ne_eq, Option.elim]
cases o <;> simp only [Option.elim] <;> rw [tr]
<;> simp only [id, TM2.stepAux, Option.isSome, cond_true, cond_false]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [Function.update_comm h₁.1, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, List.reverseAux_eq, h₂, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, List.reverse_reverse]
· convert move_ok h₁.2.1.symm (splitAtPred_false _) using 2
simp only [h₂, Function.update_comm h₁.1, List.reverseAux_eq, Function.update_self,
List.append_nil, Function.update_idem]
rw [show update S rev [] = S by rw [← h₂, Function.update_eq_self]]
simp only [Function.update_of_ne h₁.1.symm, Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.2.symm,
Function.update_of_ne h₁.2.1, Function.update_self, List.reverse_reverse]
theorem clear_ok {p k q s L₁ o L₂} {S : K' → List Γ'} (e : splitAtPred p (S k) = (L₁, o, L₂)) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.clear p k q), s, S⟩ ⟨some q, o, update S k L₂⟩ := by
induction' L₁ with a L₁ IH generalizing S s
· refine TransGen.head' rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
revert e; rcases S k with - | ⟨a, Sk⟩ <;> intro e
· cases e
rfl
simp only [splitAtPred, Option.elim, List.head?, List.tail_cons] at e ⊢
revert e; cases p a <;> intro e <;>
simp only [cond_false, cond_true, Prod.mk.injEq, true_and, false_and, reduceCtorEq] at e ⊢
rcases e with ⟨e₁, e₂⟩
rw [e₁, e₂]
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, Option.elim]
rcases e₁ : S k with - | ⟨a', Sk⟩ <;> rw [e₁, splitAtPred] at e
· cases e
cases e₂ : p a' <;> simp only [e₂, cond] at e
swap
· cases e
rcases e₃ : splitAtPred p Sk with ⟨_, _, _⟩
rw [e₃] at e
cases e
simp only [List.head?_cons, e₂, List.tail_cons, cond_false]
convert @IH _ (update S k Sk) _ using 2 <;> simp [e₃]
theorem copy_ok (q s a b c d) :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.copy q), s, K'.elim a b c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (List.reverseAux b a) [] c (List.reverseAux b d)⟩ := by
induction' b with x b IH generalizing a d s
· refine TransGen.single ?_
simp
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_rev, List.head?_cons, Option.isSome_some,
List.tail_cons, elim_update_rev, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_update_main,
elim_stack, elim_update_stack, cond_true, List.reverseAux_cons, pop', push']
exact IH _ _ _
theorem trPosNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trPosNum n, natEnd x = false
| PosNum.one, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit0 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
| PosNum.bit1 _, _, List.Mem.head _ => rfl
| PosNum.bit1 n, _, List.Mem.tail _ h => trPosNum_natEnd n _ h
theorem trNum_natEnd : ∀ (n), ∀ x ∈ trNum n, natEnd x = false
| Num.pos n, x, h => trPosNum_natEnd n x h
theorem trNat_natEnd (n) : ∀ x ∈ trNat n, natEnd x = false :=
trNum_natEnd _
theorem trList_ne_consₗ : ∀ (l), ∀ x ∈ trList l, x ≠ Γ'.consₗ
| a :: l, x, h => by
simp only [trList, List.mem_append, List.mem_cons] at h
obtain h | rfl | h := h
· rintro rfl
cases trNat_natEnd _ _ h
· rintro ⟨⟩
· exact trList_ne_consₗ l _ h
theorem head_main_ok {q s L} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (head main q), s, K'.elim (trList L) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [L.headI]) [] c d⟩ := by
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn L none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat L.headI) o (trList L.tail) (trNat_natEnd _) ?_)).trans
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
· cases L <;> simp [o]
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_update_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev,
Function.update_self, trList]
rw [if_neg (show o ≠ some Γ'.consₗ by cases L <;> simp [o])]
refine (clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ none [] ?_ ⟨rfl, rfl⟩)).trans ?_
· exact fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)
convert unrev_ok using 2; simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem head_stack_ok {q s L₁ L₂ L₃} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (head stack q), s, K'.elim (trList L₁) [] [] (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList (L₂.headI :: L₁)) [] [] L₃⟩ := by
rcases L₂ with - | ⟨a, L₂⟩
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ [] (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃ (by rintro _ ⟨⟩) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_true, id_eq, trList, List.nil_append,
elim_update_stack, elim_rev, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_nil, trNat_default]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
· refine
TransGen.trans
(move_ok (by decide)
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat a) (some Γ'.cons) (trList L₂ ++ Γ'.consₗ :: L₃)
(trNat_natEnd _) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
(TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.head rfl ?_))
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, ite_false, trList, List.append_assoc,
List.cons_append, elim_update_stack, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self,
List.headI_cons]
refine
TransGen.trans
(clear_ok
(splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trList L₂) (some Γ'.consₗ) L₃
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, by simp⟩))
?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq]
theorem succ_ok {q s n} {c d : List Γ'} :
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.succ q), s, K'.elim (trList [n]) [] c d⟩
⟨some q, none, K'.elim (trList [n.succ]) [] c d⟩ := by
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
simp only [Option.mem_def, TM2.stepAux, elim_main, decide_false, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_rev, elim_update_rev, decide_true, Function.update_self,
cond_true, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 1
simp only [elim_update_rev, elim_rev, elim_main, List.reverseAux_nil, elim_update_main]
rfl
simp only [trNum, Num.succ, Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a.succ) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some q.succ, s, K'.elim (trPosNum a ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ [Γ'.cons]) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp? [List.reverseAux] at e says simp only [List.reverseAux, List.reverseAux_eq] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m _ generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, [Γ'.bit1], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (Γ'.bit0 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp [PosNum.succ, trPosNum]
rfl
· refine ⟨l₁, _, some Γ'.bit0, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step]; rw [tr]
simp only [TM2.stepAux, pop', elim_main, elim_update_main, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_rev, elim_update_rev, Function.update_self, Option.mem_def, Option.some.injEq]
rfl
theorem pred_ok (q₁ q₂ s v) (c d : List Γ') : ∃ s',
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) ⟨some (Λ'.pred q₁ q₂), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] c d⟩
(v.headI.rec ⟨some q₁, s', K'.elim (trList v.tail) [] c d⟩ fun n _ =>
⟨some q₂, s', K'.elim (trList (n::v.tail)) [] c d⟩) := by
rcases v with (_ | ⟨_ | n, v⟩)
· refine ⟨none, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
· refine ⟨some Γ'.cons, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp
refine ⟨none, ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, trList, trNat.eq_1, trNum, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ,
List.tail_cons, List.headI_cons]
rcases (n : Num) with - | a
· simp only [trPosNum, Num.succ', List.singleton_append, List.nil_append]
refine TransGen.head rfl ?_
rw [tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, cond_false]
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp
simp only [Num.succ']
suffices ∀ l₁, ∃ l₁' l₂' s',
List.reverseAux l₁ (trPosNum a) = List.reverseAux l₁' l₂' ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (q₁.pred q₂), s, K'.elim (trPosNum a.succ ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁ c d⟩
⟨some (unrev q₂), s', K'.elim (l₂' ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v) l₁' c d⟩ by
obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := this []
simp only [List.reverseAux] at e
refine h.trans ?_
convert unrev_ok using 2
simp [e, List.reverseAux_eq]
induction' a with m IH m IH generalizing s <;> intro l₁
· refine ⟨Γ'.bit1::l₁, [], some Γ'.cons, rfl, TransGen.head rfl (TransGen.single ?_)⟩
simp [trPosNum, show PosNum.one.succ = PosNum.one.bit0 from rfl]
· obtain ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, h⟩ := IH (some Γ'.bit0) (Γ'.bit1 :: l₁)
refine ⟨l₁', l₂', s', e, TransGen.head ?_ h⟩
simp
rfl
· obtain ⟨a, l, e, h⟩ : ∃ a l, (trPosNum m = a::l) ∧ natEnd a = false := by
cases m <;> refine ⟨_, _, rfl, rfl⟩
refine ⟨Γ'.bit0 :: l₁, _, some a, rfl, TransGen.single ?_⟩
simp [trPosNum, PosNum.succ, e, h, show some Γ'.bit1 ≠ some Γ'.bit0 by decide,
Option.iget, -natEnd]
rfl
theorem trNormal_respects (c k v s) :
∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepNormal c k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (trNormal c (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction c generalizing k v s with
| zero' => refine ⟨_, ⟨s, rfl⟩, TransGen.single ?_⟩; simp
| succ => refine ⟨_, ⟨none, rfl⟩, head_main_ok.trans succ_ok⟩
| tail =>
let o : Option Γ' := List.casesOn v none fun _ _ => some Γ'.cons
refine ⟨_, ⟨o, rfl⟩, ?_⟩; convert clear_ok _ using 2
· simp; rfl
swap
refine splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI) _ _ (trNat_natEnd _) ?_
cases v <;> simp [o]
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf (Cont.cons₁ fs v k) v none
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| (move_ok (by decide) (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_⟩
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, elim_stack, elim_update_stack, elim_update_main, ne_eq,
Function.update_of_ne, elim_main, elim_rev, elim_update_rev]
refine (copy_ok _ none [] (trList v).reverse _ _).trans ?_
convert h₂ using 2
simp [List.reverseAux_eq, trContStack]
| comp f _ _ IHg => exact IHg (Cont.comp f k) v s
| case f g IHf IHg =>
rw [stepNormal]
simp only
obtain ⟨s', h⟩ := pred_ok _ _ s v _ _
revert h; rcases v.headI with - | n <;> intro h
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHf k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IHg k _ s'
exact ⟨_, h₁, h.trans h₂⟩
| fix f IH => apply IH
theorem tr_ret_respects (k v s) : ∃ b₂,
TrCfg (stepRet k v) b₂ ∧
Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr)
⟨some (Λ'.ret (trCont k)), s, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] (trContStack k)⟩ b₂ := by
induction k generalizing v s with
| halt => exact ⟨_, rfl, TransGen.single rfl⟩
| cons₁ fs as k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects fs (Cont.cons₂ v k) as none
refine ⟨s', h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩; simp
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, id_eq, elim_update_main, elim_main, elim_aux,
List.append_nil, elim_update_aux]
refine (move₂_ok (L₁ := ?_) (o := ?_) (L₂ := ?_) (by decide) rfl ?_).trans ?_
pick_goal 4
· exact splitAtPred_eq _ _ _ (some Γ'.consₗ) _
(fun x h => Bool.decide_false (trList_ne_consₗ _ _ h)) ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
refine (move₂_ok (by decide) ?_ (splitAtPred_false _)).trans ?_; · rfl
simp only [TM2.step, Option.mem_def, Option.elim, elim_update_stack, elim_main,
List.append_nil, elim_update_main, id_eq, elim_update_aux, ne_eq, Function.update_of_ne,
elim_aux, elim_stack]
exact h₂
| cons₂ ns k IH =>
obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH (ns.headI :: v) none
exact ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| head_stack_ok.trans h₂⟩
| comp f k _ =>
obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f k v s
exact ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl h₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [stepRet]
have :
if v.headI = 0 then natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = true ∧ (trList v).tail = trList v.tail
else
natEnd (trList v).head?.iget = false ∧
(trList v).tail = (trNat v.headI).tail ++ Γ'.cons :: trList v.tail := by
obtain - | n := v
· exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
rcases n with - | n
· simp
rw [trList, List.headI, trNat, Nat.cast_succ, Num.add_one, Num.succ, List.tail]
cases (n : Num).succ' <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩
by_cases h : v.headI = 0 <;> simp only [h, ite_true, ite_false] at this ⊢
· obtain ⟨c, h₁, h₂⟩ := IH v.tail (trList v).head?
refine ⟨c, h₁, TransGen.head rfl ?_⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this, elim_update_main]
exact h₂
· obtain ⟨s', h₁, h₂⟩ := trNormal_respects f (Cont.fix f k) v.tail (some Γ'.cons)
refine ⟨_, h₁, TransGen.head rfl <| TransGen.trans ?_ h₂⟩
rw [trCont, tr]; simp only [pop', TM2.stepAux, elim_main, this.1]
convert clear_ok (splitAtPred_eq _ _ (trNat v.headI).tail (some Γ'.cons) _ _ _) using 2
· simp
convert rfl
· exact fun x h => trNat_natEnd _ _ (List.tail_subset _ h)
· exact ⟨rfl, this.2⟩
theorem tr_respects : Respects step (TM2.step tr) TrCfg
| Cfg.ret _ _, _, ⟨_, rfl⟩ => tr_ret_respects _ _ _
| Cfg.halt _, _, rfl => rfl
/-- The initial state, evaluating function `c` on input `v`. -/
def init (c : Code) (v : List ℕ) : Cfg' :=
⟨some (trNormal c Cont'.halt), none, K'.elim (trList v) [] [] []⟩
theorem tr_init (c v) :
∃ b, TrCfg (stepNormal c Cont.halt v) b ∧ Reaches₁ (TM2.step tr) (init c v) b :=
trNormal_respects _ _ _ _
theorem tr_eval (c v) : eval (TM2.step tr) (init c v) = halt <$> Code.eval c v := by
obtain ⟨i, h₁, h₂⟩ := tr_init c v
refine Part.ext fun x => ?_
rw [reaches_eval h₂.to_reflTransGen]; simp only [Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· obtain ⟨c, hc₁, hc₂⟩ := tr_eval_rev tr_respects h₁ h
simp [stepNormal_eval] at hc₂
obtain ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩ := hc₂
exact ⟨_, hv, hc₁.symm⟩
· rintro ⟨v', hv, rfl⟩
have := Turing.tr_eval (b₁ := Cfg.halt v') tr_respects h₁
simp only [stepNormal_eval, Part.map_eq_map, Part.mem_map_iff, Cfg.halt.injEq,
exists_eq_right] at this
obtain ⟨_, ⟨⟩, h⟩ := this hv
exact h
/-- The set of machine states reachable via downward label jumps, discounting jumps via `ret`. -/
def trStmts₁ : Λ' → Finset Λ'
| Q@(Λ'.move _ _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.push _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.read q) => insert Q <| Finset.univ.biUnion fun s => trStmts₁ (q s)
| Q@(Λ'.clear _ _ q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.copy q) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.succ q) => insert Q <| insert (unrev q) <| trStmts₁ q
| Q@(Λ'.pred q₁ q₂) => insert Q <| trStmts₁ q₁ ∪ insert (unrev q₂) (trStmts₁ q₂)
| Q@(Λ'.ret _) => {Q}
theorem trStmts₁_trans {q q'} : q' ∈ trStmts₁ q → trStmts₁ q' ⊆ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
all_goals
simp +contextual only [trStmts₁, Finset.mem_insert, Finset.mem_union,
or_imp, Finset.mem_singleton, Finset.Subset.refl, imp_true_iff, true_and]
repeat exact fun h => Finset.Subset.trans (q_ih h) (Finset.subset_insert _ _)
· simp
intro s h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_biUnion, Finset.mem_univ, true_and, Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr ⟨_, q_ih s h h'⟩
· constructor
· rintro rfl
apply Finset.subset_insert
· intro h x h'
simp only [Finset.mem_insert]
exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| q_ih h h')
· refine ⟨fun h x h' => ?_, fun _ x h' => ?_, fun h x h' => ?_⟩ <;> simp
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inl <| q₁_ih h h')
· rcases Finset.mem_insert.1 h' with h' | h' <;> simp [h', unrev]
· exact Or.inr (Or.inr <| Or.inr <| q₂_ih h h')
theorem trStmts₁_self (q) : q ∈ trStmts₁ q := by
induction q <;> · first |apply Finset.mem_singleton_self|apply Finset.mem_insert_self
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c`,
including the state `ret k` but not any states after that (that is, the states visited while
evaluating `k`). -/
def codeSupp' : Code → Cont' → Finset Λ'
| c@Code.zero', k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.succ, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@Code.tail, k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k)
| c@(Code.cons f fs), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) ∪
(trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k))))
| c@(Code.comp f g), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' g (Cont'.comp f k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (trNormal f k) ∪ codeSupp' f k))
| c@(Code.case f g), k => trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪ (codeSupp' f k ∪ codeSupp' g k)
| c@(Code.fix f), k =>
trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ∪
(codeSupp' f (Cont'.fix f k) ∪
(trStmts₁ (Λ'.clear natEnd main <| trNormal f (Cont'.fix f k)) ∪ {Λ'.ret k}))
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp'_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp' c k := by
cases c <;> first | rfl | exact Finset.union_subset_left (fun _ a ↦ a)
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of a continuation
`k`, not including the initial state `ret k`. -/
def contSupp : Cont' → Finset Λ'
| Cont'.cons₁ fs k =>
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
(codeSupp' fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) ∪ (trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k))
| Cont'.cons₂ k => trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.comp f k => codeSupp' f k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.fix f k => codeSupp' (Code.fix f) k ∪ contSupp k
| Cont'.halt => ∅
/-- The (finite!) set of machine states visited during the course of evaluation of `c` in
continuation `k`. This is actually closed under forward simulation (see `tr_supports`), and the
existence of this set means that the machine constructed in this section is in fact a proper
Turing machine, with a finite set of states. -/
def codeSupp (c : Code) (k : Cont') : Finset Λ' :=
codeSupp' c k ∪ contSupp k
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_self (c k) : trStmts₁ (trNormal c k) ⊆ codeSupp c k :=
Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp'_self _ _) (Finset.union_subset_left fun _ a ↦ a)
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_zero (k) : codeSupp Code.zero' k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.zero' k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_succ (k) : codeSupp Code.succ k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.succ k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_tail (k) : codeSupp Code.tail k = trStmts₁ (trNormal Code.tail k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_cons (f fs k) :
codeSupp (Code.cons f fs) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.cons f fs) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_comp (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.comp f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.comp f g) k) ∪ codeSupp g (Cont'.comp f k) := by
simp only [codeSupp, codeSupp', trNormal, Finset.union_assoc, contSupp]
rw [← Finset.union_assoc _ _ (contSupp k),
Finset.union_eq_right.2 (codeSupp'_self _ _)]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_case (f g k) :
codeSupp (Code.case f g) k =
trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.case f g) k) ∪ (codeSupp f k ∪ codeSupp g k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm]
@[simp]
theorem codeSupp_fix (f k) :
codeSupp (Code.fix f) k = trStmts₁ (trNormal (Code.fix f) k) ∪ codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc, Finset.union_left_comm,
Finset.union_left_idem]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₁ (fs k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₁ fs k) =
trStmts₁
(move₂ (fun _ => false) main aux <|
move₂ (fun s => s = Γ'.consₗ) stack main <|
move₂ (fun _ => false) aux stack <| trNormal fs (Cont'.cons₂ k)) ∪
codeSupp fs (Cont'.cons₂ k) := by
simp [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_cons₂ (k) :
contSupp (Cont'.cons₂ k) = trStmts₁ (head stack <| Λ'.ret k) ∪ contSupp k :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_comp (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.comp f k) = codeSupp f k :=
rfl
theorem contSupp_fix (f k) : contSupp (Cont'.fix f k) = codeSupp f (Cont'.fix f k) := by
simp +contextual [codeSupp, codeSupp', contSupp, Finset.union_assoc,
Finset.subset_iff]
@[simp]
theorem contSupp_halt : contSupp Cont'.halt = ∅ :=
rfl
/-- The statement `Λ'.Supports S q` means that `contSupp k ⊆ S` for any `ret k`
reachable from `q`.
(This is a technical condition used in the proof that the machine is supported.) -/
def Λ'.Supports (S : Finset Λ') : Λ' → Prop
| Λ'.move _ _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.push _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.read q => ∀ s, Λ'.Supports S (q s)
| Λ'.clear _ _ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.copy q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.succ q => Λ'.Supports S q
| Λ'.pred q₁ q₂ => Λ'.Supports S q₁ ∧ Λ'.Supports S q₂
| Λ'.ret k => contSupp k ⊆ S
/-- A shorthand for the predicate that we are proving in the main theorems `trStmts₁_supports`,
`codeSupp'_supports`, `contSupp_supports`, `codeSupp_supports`. The set `S` is fixed throughout
the proof, and denotes the full set of states in the machine, while `K` is a subset that we are
currently proving a property about. The predicate asserts that every state in `K` is closed in `S`
under forward simulation, i.e. stepping forward through evaluation starting from any state in `K`
stays entirely within `S`. -/
def Supports (K S : Finset Λ') :=
∀ q ∈ K, TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q)
theorem supports_insert {K S q} :
Supports (insert q K) S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) ∧ Supports K S := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_singleton {S q} : Supports {q} S ↔ TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr q) := by simp [Supports]
theorem supports_union {K₁ K₂ S} : Supports (K₁ ∪ K₂) S ↔ Supports K₁ S ∧ Supports K₂ S := by
simp [Supports, or_imp, forall_and]
theorem supports_biUnion {K : Option Γ' → Finset Λ'} {S} :
Supports (Finset.univ.biUnion K) S ↔ ∀ a, Supports (K a) S := by
simpa [Supports] using forall_swap
theorem head_supports {S k q} (H : (q : Λ').Supports S) : (head k q).Supports S := fun _ => by
dsimp only; split_ifs <;> exact H
theorem ret_supports {S k} (H₁ : contSupp k ⊆ S) : TM2.SupportsStmt S (tr (Λ'.ret k)) := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
cases k with
| halt => trivial
| cons₁ => rw [contSupp_cons₁, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| cons₂ => rw [contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁.1 W
| comp => rw [contSupp_comp] at H₁; exact fun _ => H₁ (codeSupp_self _ _ W)
| fix =>
rw [contSupp_fix] at H₁
have L := @Finset.mem_union_left; have R := @Finset.mem_union_right
intro s; dsimp only; cases natEnd s.iget
· refine H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| L _ W)
· exact H₁ (R _ <| L _ <| R _ <| R _ <| R _ <| Finset.mem_singleton_self _)
theorem trStmts₁_supports {S q} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (HS₁ : trStmts₁ q ⊆ S) :
Supports (trStmts₁ q) S := by
have W := fun {q} => trStmts₁_self q
induction q with
| move _ _ _ q q_ih => _ | clear _ _ q q_ih => _ | copy q q_ih => _ | push _ _ q q_ih => _
| read q q_ih => _ | succ q q_ih => _ | pred q₁ q₂ q₁_ih q₂_ih => _ | ret => _ <;>
simp [trStmts₁, -Finset.singleton_subset_iff] at HS₁ ⊢
any_goals
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := Finset.insert_subset_iff.1 HS₁
first | have h₃ := h₂ W | try simp [Finset.subset_iff] at h₂
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- move
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₁⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- clear
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- copy
· exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₃, fun _ => h₃⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂⟩ -- push
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨fun _ => h₂ _ W, ?_⟩ -- read
exact supports_biUnion.2 fun _ => q_ih _ (H₁ _) fun _ h => h₂ _ h
· refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩ -- succ
exact supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ W, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, q_ih H₁ h₂.2⟩
· refine -- pred
supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₁, fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl W),
fun _ => h₂.1, fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_insert.2 ⟨⟨fun _ => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr W), fun _ => h₂.1⟩, ?_⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· exact q₁_ih H₁.1 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inl h)
· exact q₂_ih H₁.2 fun _ h => h₂.2 _ (Or.inr h)
· exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports H₁) -- ret
theorem trStmts₁_supports' {S q K} (H₁ : (q : Λ').Supports S) (H₂ : trStmts₁ q ∪ K ⊆ S)
(H₃ : K ⊆ S → Supports K S) : Supports (trStmts₁ q ∪ K) S := by
simp only [Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact supports_union.2 ⟨trStmts₁_supports H₁ H₂.1, H₃ H₂.2⟩
theorem trNormal_supports {S c k} (Hk : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : (trNormal c k).Supports S := by
induction c generalizing k with simp [Λ'.Supports, head]
| zero' => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| succ => intro; split_ifs <;> exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| tail => exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| cons f fs IHf _ =>
apply IHf
rw [codeSupp_cons] at Hk
exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| comp f g _ IHg => apply IHg; rw [codeSupp_comp] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
| case f g IHf IHg =>
simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at Hk
exact ⟨IHf Hk.2.1, IHg Hk.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf => apply IHf; rw [codeSupp_fix] at Hk; exact Finset.union_subset_right Hk
theorem codeSupp'_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp' c k) S := by
induction c generalizing k with
| cons f fs IHf IHfs =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_cons, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun h => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2, H.2⟩
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHfs ?_, ?_⟩
· rw [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₁] at H'
exact Finset.union_subset_right (Finset.union_subset_right H'.2)
exact
trStmts₁_supports (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
(Finset.union_subset_right h)
| comp f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; rw [codeSupp_comp] at H'; have H' := Finset.union_subset_right H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHg H', ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.2.2, H.2⟩
exact IHf (Finset.union_subset_right H')
| case f g IHf IHg =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_case, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun _ => ?_
exact supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2.1, IHg H'.2.2⟩
| fix f IHf =>
have H' := H; simp only [codeSupp_fix, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H'
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.union_subset_left H) fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨IHf H'.2, ?_⟩
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports ?_) (Finset.union_subset_right h) fun _ => ?_
· simp only [codeSupp', codeSupp, Finset.union_subset_iff, contSupp, trStmts₁,
Finset.insert_subset_iff] at h H ⊢
exact ⟨h.1, ⟨H.1.1, h⟩, H.2⟩
exact supports_singleton.2 (ret_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H)
| _ => exact trStmts₁_supports (trNormal_supports H) (Finset.Subset.trans (codeSupp_self _ _) H)
theorem contSupp_supports {S k} (H : contSupp k ⊆ S) : Supports (contSupp k) S := by
induction k with
| halt => simp [contSupp_halt, Supports]
| cons₁ f k IH =>
have H₁ := H; rw [contSupp_cons₁] at H₁; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H₁
refine trStmts₁_supports' (trNormal_supports H₂) H₁ fun h => ?_
refine supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H₂, ?_⟩
simp only [codeSupp, contSupp_cons₂, Finset.union_subset_iff] at H₂
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports H₂.2.2) (Finset.union_subset_right h) IH
| cons₂ k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_cons₂] at H'
exact trStmts₁_supports' (head_supports <| Finset.union_subset_right H') H' IH
| comp f k IH =>
have H' := H; rw [contSupp_comp] at H'; have H₂ := Finset.union_subset_right H'
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H', IH H₂⟩
| fix f k IH =>
rw [contSupp] at H
exact supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, IH (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
theorem codeSupp_supports {S c k} (H : codeSupp c k ⊆ S) : Supports (codeSupp c k) S :=
supports_union.2 ⟨codeSupp'_supports H, contSupp_supports (Finset.union_subset_right H)⟩
/-- The set `codeSupp c k` is a finite set that witnesses the effective finiteness of the `tr`
Turing machine. Starting from the initial state `trNormal c k`, forward simulation uses only
states in `codeSupp c k`, so this is a finite state machine. Even though the underlying type of
state labels `Λ'` is infinite, for a given partial recursive function `c` and continuation `k`,
only finitely many states are accessed, corresponding roughly to subterms of `c`. -/
theorem tr_supports (c k) : @TM2.Supports _ _ _ _ ⟨trNormal c k⟩ tr (codeSupp c k) :=
⟨codeSupp_self _ _ (trStmts₁_self _), fun _ => codeSupp_supports (Finset.Subset.refl _) _⟩
end
end PartrecToTM2
end Turing
| Mathlib/Computability/TMToPartrec.lean | 1,827 | 1,830 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finset.Lattice.Fold
/-!
# Down-compressions
This file defines down-compression.
Down-compressing `𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)` along `a : α` means removing `a` from the elements of `𝒜`,
when the resulting set is not already in `𝒜`.
## Main declarations
* `Finset.nonMemberSubfamily`: `𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a` is the subfamily of sets not containing
`a`.
* `Finset.memberSubfamily`: `𝒜.memberSubfamily a` is the image of the subfamily of sets containing
`a` under removing `a`.
* `Down.compression`: Down-compression.
## Notation
`𝓓 a 𝒜` is notation for `Down.compress a 𝒜` in locale `SetFamily`.
## References
* https://github.com/b-mehta/maths-notes/blob/master/iii/mich/combinatorics.pdf
## Tags
compression, down-compression
-/
variable {α : Type*} [DecidableEq α] {𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)} {s : Finset α} {a : α}
namespace Finset
/-- Elements of `𝒜` that do not contain `a`. -/
def nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) := {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∉ s}
/-- Image of the elements of `𝒜` which contain `a` under removing `a`. Finsets that do not contain
`a` such that `insert a s ∈ 𝒜`. -/
def memberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) : Finset (Finset α) :=
{s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s}.image fun s => erase s a
@[simp]
theorem mem_nonMemberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ↔ s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp [nonMemberSubfamily]
@[simp]
theorem mem_memberSubfamily : s ∈ 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ↔ insert a s ∈ 𝒜 ∧ a ∉ s := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun h => ⟨insert a s, ⟨h.1, by simp⟩, erase_insert h.2⟩⟩
rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs1, hs2⟩, rfl⟩
rw [insert_erase hs2]
exact ⟨hs1, not_mem_erase _ _⟩
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_inter_distrib _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_inter (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∩ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∩ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
unfold memberSubfamily
rw [filter_inter_distrib, image_inter_of_injOn _ _ ((erase_injOn' _).mono _)]
simp
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.nonMemberSubfamily a :=
filter_union _ _ _
theorem memberSubfamily_union (a : α) (𝒜 ℬ : Finset (Finset α)) :
(𝒜 ∪ ℬ).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ ℬ.memberSubfamily a := by
simp_rw [memberSubfamily, filter_union, image_union]
theorem card_memberSubfamily_add_card_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
#(𝒜.memberSubfamily a) + #(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a) = #𝒜 := by
rw [memberSubfamily, nonMemberSubfamily, card_image_of_injOn]
· conv_rhs => rw [← filter_card_add_filter_neg_card_eq_card (fun s => (a ∈ s))]
· apply (erase_injOn' _).mono
simp
theorem memberSubfamily_union_nonMemberSubfamily (a : α) (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) :
𝒜.memberSubfamily a ∪ 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.image fun s => s.erase a := by
ext s
simp only [mem_union, mem_memberSubfamily, mem_nonMemberSubfamily, mem_image, exists_prop]
constructor
· rintro (h | h)
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_insert h.2⟩
· exact ⟨_, h.1, erase_eq_of_not_mem h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨s, hs, rfl⟩
by_cases ha : a ∈ s
· exact Or.inl ⟨by rwa [insert_erase ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
· exact Or.inr ⟨by rwa [erase_eq_of_not_mem ha], not_mem_erase _ _⟩
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_memberSubfamily : (𝒜.memberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem memberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily : (𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_memberSubfamily :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.memberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem nonMemberSubfamily_nonMemberSubfamily :
(𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a).nonMemberSubfamily a = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily a := by
ext
simp
lemma memberSubfamily_image_insert (h𝒜 : ∀ s ∈ 𝒜, a ∉ s) :
(𝒜.image <| insert a).memberSubfamily a = 𝒜 := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image]
refine ⟨?_, fun hs ↦ ⟨⟨s, hs, rfl⟩, h𝒜 _ hs⟩⟩
rintro ⟨⟨t, ht, hts⟩, hs⟩
rwa [← insert_erase_invOn.2.injOn (h𝒜 _ ht) hs hts]
@[simp] lemma nonMemberSubfamily_image_insert : (𝒜.image <| insert a).nonMemberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
@[simp] lemma memberSubfamily_image_erase : (𝒜.image (erase · a)).memberSubfamily a = ∅ := by
simp [eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem,
(ne_of_mem_of_not_mem' (mem_insert_self _ _) (not_mem_erase _ _)).symm]
lemma image_insert_memberSubfamily (𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (a : α) :
(𝒜.memberSubfamily a).image (insert a) = {s ∈ 𝒜 | a ∈ s} := by
ext s
simp only [mem_memberSubfamily, mem_image, mem_filter]
refine ⟨?_, fun ⟨hs, ha⟩ ↦ ⟨erase s a, ⟨?_, not_mem_erase _ _⟩, insert_erase ha⟩⟩
· rintro ⟨s, ⟨hs, -⟩, rfl⟩
exact ⟨hs, mem_insert_self _ _⟩
· rwa [insert_erase ha]
/-- Induction principle for finset families. To prove a statement for every finset family,
it suffices to prove it for
* the empty finset family.
* the finset family which only contains the empty finset.
* `ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}` assuming the property for `ℬ` and `𝒞`, where `a` is an element of the
ground type and `𝒜` and `ℬ` are families of finsets not containing `a`.
Note that instead of giving `ℬ` and `𝒞`, the `subfamily` case gives you
| `𝒜 = ℬ ∪ {s ∪ {a} | s ∈ 𝒞}`, so that `ℬ = 𝒜.nonMemberSubfamily` and `𝒞 = 𝒜.memberSubfamily`.
This is a way of formalising induction on `n` where `𝒜` is a finset family on `n` elements.
See also `Finset.family_induction_on.` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
lemma memberFamily_induction_on {p : Finset (Finset α) → Prop}
(𝒜 : Finset (Finset α)) (empty : p ∅) (singleton_empty : p {∅})
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/SetFamily/Compression/Down.lean | 154 | 161 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Jeremy Avigad. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Jeremy Avigad, Sébastien Gouëzel, Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Asymptotics.AsymptoticEquivalent
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Linear
import Mathlib.Analysis.Calculus.FDeriv.Comp
/-!
# The derivative of a linear equivalence
For detailed documentation of the Fréchet derivative,
see the module docstring of `Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Basic.lean`.
This file contains the usual formulas (and existence assertions) for the derivative of
continuous linear equivalences.
We also prove the usual formula for the derivative of the inverse function, assuming it exists.
The inverse function theorem is in `Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/InverseFunctionTheorem/FDeriv.lean`.
-/
open Filter Asymptotics ContinuousLinearMap Set Metric Topology NNReal ENNReal
noncomputable section
section
variable {𝕜 : Type*} [NontriviallyNormedField 𝕜]
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E] [NormedSpace 𝕜 E]
variable {F : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup F] [NormedSpace 𝕜 F]
variable {G : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G]
variable {G' : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup G'] [NormedSpace 𝕜 G']
variable {f : E → F} {f' : E →L[𝕜] F} {x : E} {s : Set E} {c : F}
namespace ContinuousLinearEquiv
/-! ### Differentiability of linear equivs, and invariance of differentiability -/
variable (iso : E ≃L[𝕜] F)
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasStrictFDerivAt : HasStrictFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasStrictFDerivAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivWithinAt : HasFDerivWithinAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) s x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivWithinAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem hasFDerivAt : HasFDerivAt iso (iso : E →L[𝕜] F) x :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.hasFDerivAtFilter
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableAt : DifferentiableAt 𝕜 iso x :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableWithinAt : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 iso s x :=
iso.differentiableAt.differentiableWithinAt
protected theorem fderiv : fderiv 𝕜 iso x = iso :=
iso.hasFDerivAt.fderiv
protected theorem fderivWithin (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) : fderivWithin 𝕜 iso s x = iso :=
iso.toContinuousLinearMap.fderivWithin hxs
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiable : Differentiable 𝕜 iso := fun _ => iso.differentiableAt
@[fun_prop]
protected theorem differentiableOn : DifferentiableOn 𝕜 iso s :=
iso.differentiable.differentiableOn
theorem comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} :
DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x ↔ DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x := by
refine
⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H⟩
have : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f) s x :=
iso.symm.differentiable.differentiableAt.comp_differentiableWithinAt x H
rwa [← Function.comp_assoc iso.symm iso f, iso.symm_comp_self] at this
theorem comp_differentiableAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} :
DifferentiableAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x ↔ DifferentiableAt 𝕜 f x := by
rw [← differentiableWithinAt_univ, ← differentiableWithinAt_univ,
iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiableOn_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} :
DifferentiableOn 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s ↔ DifferentiableOn 𝕜 f s := by
rw [DifferentiableOn, DifferentiableOn]
simp only [iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_differentiable_iff {f : G → E} : Differentiable 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) ↔ Differentiable 𝕜 f := by
rw [← differentiableOn_univ, ← differentiableOn_univ]
exact iso.comp_differentiableOn_iff
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') s x ↔ HasFDerivWithinAt f f' s x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H⟩
have A : f = iso.symm ∘ iso ∘ f := by
rw [← Function.comp_assoc, iso.symm_comp_self]
rfl
have B : f' = (iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') := by
rw [← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_symm_comp_coe, ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
rw [A, B]
exact iso.symm.hasFDerivAt.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt x H
theorem comp_hasStrictFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasStrictFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasStrictFDerivAt f f' x := by
refine ⟨fun H => ?_, fun H => iso.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H⟩
convert iso.symm.hasStrictFDerivAt.comp x H using 1 <;>
ext z <;> apply (iso.symm_apply_apply _).symm
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] E} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) ((iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp f') x ↔ HasFDerivAt f f' x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff]
theorem comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff' {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivWithinAt (iso ∘ f) f' s x ↔
HasFDerivWithinAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') s x := by
rw [← iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff, ← ContinuousLinearMap.comp_assoc, iso.coe_comp_coe_symm,
ContinuousLinearMap.id_comp]
theorem comp_hasFDerivAt_iff' {f : G → E} {x : G} {f' : G →L[𝕜] F} :
HasFDerivAt (iso ∘ f) f' x ↔ HasFDerivAt f ((iso.symm : F →L[𝕜] E).comp f') x := by
simp_rw [← hasFDerivWithinAt_univ, iso.comp_hasFDerivWithinAt_iff']
theorem comp_fderivWithin {f : G → E} {s : Set G} {x : G} (hxs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
by_cases h : DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 f s x
· rw [fderiv_comp_fderivWithin x iso.differentiableAt h hxs, iso.fderiv]
· have : ¬DifferentiableWithinAt 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) s x := mt iso.comp_differentiableWithinAt_iff.1 h
rw [fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt h,
fderivWithin_zero_of_not_differentiableWithinAt this, ContinuousLinearMap.comp_zero]
theorem comp_fderiv {f : G → E} {x : G} :
fderiv 𝕜 (iso ∘ f) x = (iso : E →L[𝕜] F).comp (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
rw [← fderivWithin_univ, ← fderivWithin_univ]
exact iso.comp_fderivWithin uniqueDiffWithinAt_univ
lemma _root_.fderivWithin_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G))
(hs : UniqueDiffWithinAt 𝕜 s x) :
fderivWithin 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) s x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderivWithin 𝕜 f s x) := by
change fderivWithin 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) s x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderivWithin _ hs]
lemma _root_.fderiv_continuousLinearEquiv_comp (L : G ≃L[𝕜] G') (f : E → (F →L[𝕜] G)) (x : E) :
fderiv 𝕜 (fun x ↦ (L : G →L[𝕜] G').comp (f x)) x =
(((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L)) ∘L (fderiv 𝕜 f x) := by
| change fderiv 𝕜 (((ContinuousLinearEquiv.refl 𝕜 F).arrowCongr L) ∘ f) x = _
rw [ContinuousLinearEquiv.comp_fderiv]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Calculus/FDeriv/Equiv.lean | 152 | 154 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Leonardo de Moura, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Notation.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Sqrt
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice.Image
/-!
# Naturals pairing function
This file defines a pairing function for the naturals as follows:
```text
0 1 4 9 16
2 3 5 10 17
6 7 8 11 18
12 13 14 15 19
20 21 22 23 24
```
It has the advantage of being monotone in both directions and sending `⟦0, n^2 - 1⟧` to
`⟦0, n - 1⟧²`.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
open Prod Decidable Function
namespace Nat
/-- Pairing function for the natural numbers. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def pair (a b : ℕ) : ℕ :=
if a < b then b * b + a else a * a + a + b
/-- Unpairing function for the natural numbers. -/
@[pp_nodot]
def unpair (n : ℕ) : ℕ × ℕ :=
let s := sqrt n
if n - s * s < s then (n - s * s, s) else (s, n - s * s - s)
@[simp]
theorem pair_unpair (n : ℕ) : pair (unpair n).1 (unpair n).2 = n := by
dsimp only [unpair]; let s := sqrt n
have sm : s * s + (n - s * s) = n := Nat.add_sub_cancel' (sqrt_le _)
split_ifs with h
· simp [s, pair, h, sm]
· have hl : n - s * s - s ≤ s := Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add.2
(Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <| by rw [← Nat.add_assoc]; apply sqrt_le_add)
simp [s, pair, hl.not_lt, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel' (le_of_not_gt h), sm]
theorem pair_unpair' {n a b} (H : unpair n = (a, b)) : pair a b = n := by
simpa [H] using pair_unpair n
@[simp]
theorem unpair_pair (a b : ℕ) : unpair (pair a b) = (a, b) := by
dsimp only [pair]; split_ifs with h
· show unpair (b * b + a) = (a, b)
have be : sqrt (b * b + a) = b := sqrt_add_eq _ (le_trans (le_of_lt h) (Nat.le_add_left _ _))
simp [unpair, be, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left, h]
· show unpair (a * a + a + b) = (a, b)
have ae : sqrt (a * a + (a + b)) = a := by
rw [sqrt_add_eq]
exact Nat.add_le_add_left (le_of_not_gt h) _
simp [unpair, ae, Nat.not_lt_zero, Nat.add_assoc, Nat.add_sub_cancel_left]
/-- An equivalence between `ℕ × ℕ` and `ℕ`. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def pairEquiv : ℕ × ℕ ≃ ℕ :=
⟨uncurry pair, unpair, fun ⟨a, b⟩ => unpair_pair a b, pair_unpair⟩
theorem surjective_unpair : Surjective unpair :=
pairEquiv.symm.surjective
@[simp]
theorem pair_eq_pair {a b c d : ℕ} : pair a b = pair c d ↔ a = c ∧ b = d :=
pairEquiv.injective.eq_iff.trans (@Prod.ext_iff ℕ ℕ (a, b) (c, d))
theorem unpair_lt {n : ℕ} (n1 : 1 ≤ n) : (unpair n).1 < n := by
let s := sqrt n
simp only [unpair, Nat.sub_le_iff_le_add]
by_cases h : n - s * s < s <;> simp [s, h, ↓reduceIte]
· exact lt_of_lt_of_le h (sqrt_le_self _)
· simp only [not_lt] at h
have s0 : 0 < s := sqrt_pos.2 n1
exact lt_of_le_of_lt h (Nat.sub_lt n1 (Nat.mul_pos s0 s0))
@[simp]
theorem unpair_zero : unpair 0 = 0 := by
rw [unpair]
simp
theorem unpair_left_le : ∀ n : ℕ, (unpair n).1 ≤ n
| 0 => by simp
| _ + 1 => le_of_lt (unpair_lt (Nat.succ_pos _))
theorem left_le_pair (a b : ℕ) : a ≤ pair a b := by simpa using unpair_left_le (pair a b)
theorem right_le_pair (a b : ℕ) : b ≤ pair a b := by
by_cases h : a < b
· simpa [pair, h] using le_trans (le_mul_self _) (Nat.le_add_right _ _)
· simp [pair, h]
theorem unpair_right_le (n : ℕ) : (unpair n).2 ≤ n := by
simpa using right_le_pair n.unpair.1 n.unpair.2
theorem pair_lt_pair_left {a₁ a₂} (b) (h : a₁ < a₂) : pair a₁ b < pair a₂ b := by
by_cases h₁ : a₁ < b <;> simp [pair, h₁, Nat.add_assoc]
· by_cases h₂ : a₂ < b <;> simp [pair, h₂, h]
simp? at h₂ says simp only [not_lt] at h₂
| apply Nat.add_lt_add_of_le_of_lt
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Pairing.lean | 112 | 112 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.IsField
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Inductions
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Monic
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Regular
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Multiplicity
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
/-!
# Division of univariate polynomials
The main defs are `divByMonic` and `modByMonic`.
The compatibility between these is given by `modByMonic_add_div`.
We also define `rootMultiplicity`.
-/
noncomputable section
open Polynomial
open Finset
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {A : Type z} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section Semiring
variable [Semiring R]
theorem X_dvd_iff {f : R[X]} : X ∣ f ↔ f.coeff 0 = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hfg⟩ => by rw [hfg, coeff_X_mul_zero], fun hf =>
⟨f.divX, by rw [← add_zero (X * f.divX), ← C_0, ← hf, X_mul_divX_add]⟩⟩
theorem X_pow_dvd_iff {f : R[X]} {n : ℕ} : X ^ n ∣ f ↔ ∀ d < n, f.coeff d = 0 :=
⟨fun ⟨g, hgf⟩ d hd => by
simp only [hgf, coeff_X_pow_mul', ite_eq_right_iff, not_le_of_lt hd, IsEmpty.forall_iff],
fun hd => by
induction n with
| zero => simp [pow_zero, one_dvd]
| succ n hn =>
obtain ⟨g, hgf⟩ := hn fun d : ℕ => fun H : d < n => hd _ (Nat.lt_succ_of_lt H)
have := coeff_X_pow_mul g n 0
rw [zero_add, ← hgf, hd n (Nat.lt_succ_self n)] at this
obtain ⟨k, hgk⟩ := Polynomial.X_dvd_iff.mpr this.symm
use k
rwa [pow_succ, mul_assoc, ← hgk]⟩
variable {p q : R[X]}
theorem finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic (hp : (0 : WithBot ℕ) < degree p) (hmp : Monic p)
(hq : q ≠ 0) : FiniteMultiplicity p q :=
have zn0 : (0 : R) ≠ 1 :=
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hq
zero_ne_one
⟨natDegree q, fun ⟨r, hr⟩ => by
have hp0 : p ≠ 0 := fun hp0 => by simp [hp0] at hp
have hr0 : r ≠ 0 := fun hr0 => by subst hr0; simp [hq] at hr
have hpn1 : leadingCoeff p ^ (natDegree q + 1) = 1 := by simp [show _ = _ from hmp]
have hpn0' : leadingCoeff p ^ (natDegree q + 1) ≠ 0 := hpn1.symm ▸ zn0.symm
have hpnr0 : leadingCoeff (p ^ (natDegree q + 1)) * leadingCoeff r ≠ 0 := by
simp only [leadingCoeff_pow' hpn0', leadingCoeff_eq_zero, hpn1, one_pow, one_mul, Ne,
hr0, not_false_eq_true]
have hnp : 0 < natDegree p := Nat.cast_lt.1 <| by
rw [← degree_eq_natDegree hp0]; exact hp
have := congr_arg natDegree hr
rw [natDegree_mul' hpnr0, natDegree_pow' hpn0', add_mul, add_assoc] at this
exact
ne_of_lt
(lt_add_of_le_of_pos (le_mul_of_one_le_right (Nat.zero_le _) hnp)
(add_pos_of_pos_of_nonneg (by rwa [one_mul]) (Nat.zero_le _)))
this⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_finite_of_degree_pos_of_monic := finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic
end Semiring
section Ring
variable [Ring R] {p q : R[X]}
theorem div_wf_lemma (h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0) (hq : Monic q) :
degree (p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) < degree p :=
have hp : leadingCoeff p ≠ 0 := mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h.2
have hq0 : q ≠ 0 := hq.ne_zero_of_polynomial_ne h.2
have hlt : natDegree q ≤ natDegree p :=
(Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)).1
(by rw [← degree_eq_natDegree h.2, ← degree_eq_natDegree hq0]; exact h.1)
degree_sub_lt
(by
rw [hq.degree_mul_comm, hq.degree_mul, degree_C_mul_X_pow _ hp, degree_eq_natDegree h.2,
degree_eq_natDegree hq0, ← Nat.cast_add, tsub_add_cancel_of_le hlt])
h.2 (by rw [leadingCoeff_monic_mul hq, leadingCoeff_mul_X_pow, leadingCoeff_C])
/-- See `divByMonic`. -/
noncomputable def divModByMonicAux : ∀ (_p : R[X]) {q : R[X]}, Monic q → R[X] × R[X]
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then
let z := C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q)
have _wf := div_wf_lemma h hq
let dm := divModByMonicAux (p - q * z) hq
⟨z + dm.1, dm.2⟩
else ⟨0, p⟩
termination_by p => p
/-- `divByMonic`, denoted as `p /ₘ q`, gives the quotient of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def divByMonic (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hq : Monic q then (divModByMonicAux p hq).1 else 0
/-- `modByMonic`, denoted as `p %ₘ q`, gives the remainder of `p` by a monic polynomial `q`. -/
def modByMonic (p q : R[X]) : R[X] :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hq : Monic q then (divModByMonicAux p hq).2 else p
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " /ₘ " => divByMonic
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:70 " %ₘ " => modByMonic
theorem degree_modByMonic_lt [Nontrivial R] :
∀ (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (_hq : Monic q), degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then by
have _wf := div_wf_lemma ⟨h.1, h.2⟩ hq
have :=
degree_modByMonic_lt (p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) hq
unfold modByMonic at this ⊢
unfold divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq] at this ⊢
rw [if_pos h]
exact this
else
Or.casesOn (not_and_or.1 h)
(by
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h]
exact lt_of_not_ge)
(by
intro hp
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, Classical.not_not.1 hp]
exact lt_of_le_of_ne bot_le (Ne.symm (mt degree_eq_bot.1 hq.ne_zero)))
termination_by p => p
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_lt (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hmq : Monic q) (hq : q ≠ 1) :
natDegree (p %ₘ q) < q.natDegree := by
by_cases hpq : p %ₘ q = 0
· rw [hpq, natDegree_zero, Nat.pos_iff_ne_zero]
contrapose! hq
exact eq_one_of_monic_natDegree_zero hmq hq
· haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hpq
exact natDegree_lt_natDegree hpq (degree_modByMonic_lt p hmq)
@[simp]
theorem zero_modByMonic (p : R[X]) : 0 %ₘ p = 0 := by
classical
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
by_cases hp : Monic p
· rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt And.right (not_not_intro rfl)), Prod.snd_zero]
· rw [dif_neg hp]
@[simp]
theorem zero_divByMonic (p : R[X]) : 0 /ₘ p = 0 := by
classical
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
by_cases hp : Monic p
· rw [dif_pos hp, if_neg (mt And.right (not_not_intro rfl)), Prod.fst_zero]
· rw [dif_neg hp]
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_zero (p : R[X]) : p %ₘ 0 = p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : Monic (0 : R[X]) then by
haveI := monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.mp h
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux; rw [dif_neg h]
@[simp]
theorem divByMonic_zero (p : R[X]) : p /ₘ 0 = 0 :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : Monic (0 : R[X]) then by
haveI := monic_zero_iff_subsingleton.mp h
simp [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
else by unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux; rw [dif_neg h]
theorem divByMonic_eq_of_not_monic (p : R[X]) (hq : ¬Monic q) : p /ₘ q = 0 :=
dif_neg hq
theorem modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic (p : R[X]) (hq : ¬Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p :=
dif_neg hq
theorem modByMonic_eq_self_iff [Nontrivial R] (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = p ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => h ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq, fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h
unfold modByMonic divModByMonicAux; dsimp; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt And.left this)]⟩
theorem degree_modByMonic_le (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) : degree (p %ₘ q) ≤ degree q := by
nontriviality R
exact (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq).le
theorem degree_modByMonic_le_left : degree (p %ₘ q) ≤ degree p := by
nontriviality R
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· cases lt_or_ge (degree p) (degree q)
· rw [(modByMonic_eq_self_iff hq).mpr ‹_›]
· exact (degree_modByMonic_le p hq).trans ‹_›
· rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic p hq]
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_le (p : Polynomial R) {g : Polynomial R} (hg : g.Monic) :
natDegree (p %ₘ g) ≤ g.natDegree :=
natDegree_le_natDegree (degree_modByMonic_le p hg)
theorem natDegree_modByMonic_le_left : natDegree (p %ₘ q) ≤ natDegree p :=
natDegree_le_natDegree degree_modByMonic_le_left
theorem X_dvd_sub_C : X ∣ p - C (p.coeff 0) := by
simp [X_dvd_iff, coeff_C]
theorem modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div :
∀ (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (_hq : Monic q), p %ₘ q = p - q * (p /ₘ q)
| p, q, hq =>
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : degree q ≤ degree p ∧ p ≠ 0 then by
have _wf := div_wf_lemma h hq
have ih := modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div
(p - q * (C (leadingCoeff p) * X ^ (natDegree p - natDegree q))) hq
unfold modByMonic divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_pos h]
rw [modByMonic, dif_pos hq] at ih
refine ih.trans ?_
unfold divByMonic
rw [dif_pos hq, dif_pos hq, if_pos h, mul_add, sub_add_eq_sub_sub]
else by
unfold modByMonic divByMonic divModByMonicAux
dsimp
rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg h, dif_pos hq, if_neg h, mul_zero, sub_zero]
termination_by p => p
theorem modByMonic_add_div (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q) = p :=
eq_sub_iff_add_eq.1 (modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq)
theorem divByMonic_eq_zero_iff [Nontrivial R] (hq : Monic q) : p /ₘ q = 0 ↔ degree p < degree q :=
⟨fun h => by
have := modByMonic_add_div p hq
rwa [h, mul_zero, add_zero, modByMonic_eq_self_iff hq] at this,
fun h => by
classical
have : ¬degree q ≤ degree p := not_le_of_gt h
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux; dsimp; rw [dif_pos hq, if_neg (mt And.left this)]⟩
theorem degree_add_divByMonic (hq : Monic q) (h : degree q ≤ degree p) :
degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree p := by
nontriviality R
have hdiv0 : p /ₘ q ≠ 0 := by rwa [Ne, divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq, not_lt]
have hlc : leadingCoeff q * leadingCoeff (p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := by
rwa [Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul, Ne, leadingCoeff_eq_zero]
have hmod : degree (p %ₘ q) < degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) :=
calc
degree (p %ₘ q) < degree q := degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
_ ≤ _ := by
rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hdiv0, ←
Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_le]
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
calc
degree q + degree (p /ₘ q) = degree (q * (p /ₘ q)) := Eq.symm (degree_mul' hlc)
_ = degree (p %ₘ q + q * (p /ₘ q)) := (degree_add_eq_right_of_degree_lt hmod).symm
_ = _ := congr_arg _ (modByMonic_add_div _ hq)
theorem degree_divByMonic_le (p q : R[X]) : degree (p /ₘ q) ≤ degree p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if hp0 : p = 0 then by simp only [hp0, zero_divByMonic, le_refl]
else
if hq : Monic q then
if h : degree q ≤ degree p then by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [← degree_add_divByMonic hq h, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).1 (not_lt.2 h))]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_add_left _ _)
else by
unfold divByMonic divModByMonicAux
simp [dif_pos hq, h, if_false, degree_zero, bot_le]
else (divByMonic_eq_of_not_monic p hq).symm ▸ bot_le
theorem degree_divByMonic_lt (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hq : Monic q) (hp0 : p ≠ 0)
(h0q : 0 < degree q) : degree (p /ₘ q) < degree p :=
if hpq : degree p < degree q then by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [(divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).2 hpq, degree_eq_natDegree hp0]
exact WithBot.bot_lt_coe _
else by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp0
rw [← degree_add_divByMonic hq (not_lt.1 hpq), degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt (divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hq).1 hpq)]
exact
Nat.cast_lt.2
(Nat.lt_add_of_pos_left (Nat.cast_lt.1 <|
by simpa [degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero] using h0q))
theorem natDegree_divByMonic (f : R[X]) {g : R[X]} (hg : g.Monic) :
natDegree (f /ₘ g) = natDegree f - natDegree g := by
nontriviality R
by_cases hfg : f /ₘ g = 0
· rw [hfg, natDegree_zero]
rw [divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hg] at hfg
rw [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le.mpr (natDegree_le_natDegree <| le_of_lt hfg)]
have hgf := hfg
rw [divByMonic_eq_zero_iff hg] at hgf
push_neg at hgf
have := degree_add_divByMonic hg hgf
have hf : f ≠ 0 := by
intro hf
apply hfg
rw [hf, zero_divByMonic]
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hf, degree_eq_natDegree hg.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hfg,
← Nat.cast_add, Nat.cast_inj] at this
rw [← this, add_tsub_cancel_left]
theorem div_modByMonic_unique {f g} (q r : R[X]) (hg : Monic g)
(h : r + g * q = f ∧ degree r < degree g) : f /ₘ g = q ∧ f %ₘ g = r := by
nontriviality R
have h₁ : r - f %ₘ g = -g * (q - f /ₘ g) :=
eq_of_sub_eq_zero
(by
rw [← sub_eq_zero_of_eq (h.1.trans (modByMonic_add_div f hg).symm)]
simp [mul_add, mul_comm, sub_eq_add_neg, add_comm, add_left_comm, add_assoc])
have h₂ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) = degree (g * (q - f /ₘ g)) := by simp [h₁]
have h₄ : degree (r - f %ₘ g) < degree g :=
calc
degree (r - f %ₘ g) ≤ max (degree r) (degree (f %ₘ g)) := degree_sub_le _ _
_ < degree g := max_lt_iff.2 ⟨h.2, degree_modByMonic_lt _ hg⟩
have h₅ : q - f /ₘ g = 0 :=
_root_.by_contradiction fun hqf =>
not_le_of_gt h₄ <|
calc
degree g ≤ degree g + degree (q - f /ₘ g) := by
rw [degree_eq_natDegree hg.ne_zero, degree_eq_natDegree hqf]
norm_cast
exact Nat.le_add_right _ _
_ = degree (r - f %ₘ g) := by rw [h₂, degree_mul']; simpa [Monic.def.1 hg]
exact ⟨Eq.symm <| eq_of_sub_eq_zero h₅, Eq.symm <| eq_of_sub_eq_zero <| by simpa [h₅] using h₁⟩
theorem map_mod_divByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f ∧ (p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f := by
nontriviality S
haveI : Nontrivial R := f.domain_nontrivial
have : map f p /ₘ map f q = map f (p /ₘ q) ∧ map f p %ₘ map f q = map f (p %ₘ q) :=
div_modByMonic_unique ((p /ₘ q).map f) _ (hq.map f)
⟨Eq.symm <| by rw [← Polynomial.map_mul, ← Polynomial.map_add, modByMonic_add_div _ hq],
calc
_ ≤ degree (p %ₘ q) := degree_map_le
_ < degree q := degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
_ = _ :=
Eq.symm <|
degree_map_eq_of_leadingCoeff_ne_zero _
(by rw [Monic.def.1 hq, f.map_one]; exact one_ne_zero)⟩
exact ⟨this.1.symm, this.2.symm⟩
theorem map_divByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p /ₘ q).map f = p.map f /ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_divByMonic f hq).1
theorem map_modByMonic [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hq : Monic q) :
(p %ₘ q).map f = p.map f %ₘ q.map f :=
(map_mod_divByMonic f hq).2
theorem modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (hq : Monic q) : p %ₘ q = 0 ↔ q ∣ p :=
⟨fun h => by rw [← modByMonic_add_div p hq, h, zero_add]; exact dvd_mul_right _ _, fun h => by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := exists_eq_mul_right_of_dvd h
by_contra hpq0
have hmod : p %ₘ q = q * (r - p /ₘ q) := by rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ hq, mul_sub, ← hr]
have : degree (q * (r - p /ₘ q)) < degree q := hmod ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq
have hrpq0 : leadingCoeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := fun h =>
hpq0 <|
leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1
(by rw [hmod, leadingCoeff_eq_zero.1 h, mul_zero, leadingCoeff_zero])
have hlc : leadingCoeff q * leadingCoeff (r - p /ₘ q) ≠ 0 := by rwa [Monic.def.1 hq, one_mul]
rw [degree_mul' hlc, degree_eq_natDegree hq.ne_zero,
degree_eq_natDegree (mt leadingCoeff_eq_zero.2 hrpq0)] at this
exact not_lt_of_ge (Nat.le_add_right _ _) (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 this)⟩
/-- See `Polynomial.mul_self_modByMonic` for the other multiplication order. That version, unlike
this one, requires commutativity. -/
@[simp]
lemma self_mul_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) : (q * p) %ₘ q = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq]
exact dvd_mul_right q p
theorem map_dvd_map [Ring S] (f : R →+* S) (hf : Function.Injective f) {x y : R[X]}
(hx : x.Monic) : x.map f ∣ y.map f ↔ x ∣ y := by
rw [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hx, ← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (hx.map f), ←
map_modByMonic f hx]
exact
⟨fun H => map_injective f hf <| by rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero], fun H => by
rw [H, Polynomial.map_zero]⟩
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_one (p : R[X]) : p %ₘ 1 = 0 :=
(modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (by convert monic_one (R := R))).2 (one_dvd _)
@[simp]
theorem divByMonic_one (p : R[X]) : p /ₘ 1 = p := by
conv_rhs => rw [← modByMonic_add_div p monic_one]; simp
theorem sum_modByMonic_coeff (hq : q.Monic) {n : ℕ} (hn : q.degree ≤ n) :
(∑ i : Fin n, monomial i ((p %ₘ q).coeff i)) = p %ₘ q := by
nontriviality R
exact
(sum_fin (fun i c => monomial i c) (by simp) ((degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq).trans_le hn)).trans
(sum_monomial_eq _)
theorem mul_divByMonic_cancel_left (p : R[X]) {q : R[X]} (hmo : q.Monic) :
q * p /ₘ q = p := by
nontriviality R
refine (div_modByMonic_unique _ 0 hmo ⟨by rw [zero_add], ?_⟩).1
rw [degree_zero]
exact Ne.bot_lt fun h => hmo.ne_zero (degree_eq_bot.1 h)
lemma coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C_rec (p : R[X]) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
(p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff n = coeff p (n + 1) + a * (p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff (n + 1) := by
nontriviality R
have := monic_X_sub_C a
set q := p /ₘ (X - C a)
rw [← p.modByMonic_add_div this]
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) < ↑(n + 1) := degree_X_sub_C a ▸ p.degree_modByMonic_lt this
|>.trans_le <| WithBot.coe_le_coe.mpr le_add_self
simp [q, sub_mul, add_sub, coeff_eq_zero_of_degree_lt this]
theorem coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C (p : R[X]) (a : R) (n : ℕ) :
(p /ₘ (X - C a)).coeff n = ∑ i ∈ Icc (n + 1) p.natDegree, a ^ (i - (n + 1)) * p.coeff i := by
wlog h : p.natDegree ≤ n generalizing n
· refine Nat.decreasingInduction' (fun n hn _ ih ↦ ?_) (le_of_not_le h) ?_
· rw [coeff_divByMonic_X_sub_C_rec, ih, eq_comm, Icc_eq_cons_Ioc (Nat.succ_le.mpr hn),
sum_cons, Nat.sub_self, pow_zero, one_mul, mul_sum]
congr 1; refine sum_congr ?_ fun i hi ↦ ?_
· ext; simp [Nat.succ_le]
rw [← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ', eq_comm, i.sub_succ', Nat.sub_add_cancel]
apply Nat.le_sub_of_add_le
rw [add_comm]; exact (mem_Icc.mp hi).1
· exact this _ le_rfl
rw [Icc_eq_empty (Nat.lt_succ.mpr h).not_le, sum_empty]
nontriviality R
by_cases hp : p.natDegree = 0
· rw [(divByMonic_eq_zero_iff <| monic_X_sub_C a).mpr, coeff_zero]
apply degree_lt_degree; rw [hp, natDegree_X_sub_C]; norm_num
· apply coeff_eq_zero_of_natDegree_lt
rw [natDegree_divByMonic p (monic_X_sub_C a), natDegree_X_sub_C]
exact (Nat.pred_lt hp).trans_le h
variable (R) in
theorem not_isField : ¬IsField R[X] := by
nontriviality R
intro h
letI := h.toField
simpa using congr_arg natDegree (monic_X.eq_one_of_isUnit <| monic_X (R := R).ne_zero.isUnit)
section multiplicity
/-- An algorithm for deciding polynomial divisibility.
The algorithm is "compute `p %ₘ q` and compare to `0`".
See `Polynomial.modByMonic` for the algorithm that computes `%ₘ`.
-/
def decidableDvdMonic [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) (hq : Monic q) : Decidable (q ∣ p) :=
decidable_of_iff (p %ₘ q = 0) (modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq)
theorem finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C (a : R) (h0 : p ≠ 0) : FiniteMultiplicity (X - C a) p := by
haveI := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne h0
refine finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic ?_ (monic_X_sub_C _) h0
rw [degree_X_sub_C]
decide
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-30")]
alias multiplicity_X_sub_C_finite := finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C
/- Porting note: stripping out classical for decidability instance parameter might
make for better ergonomics -/
/-- The largest power of `X - C a` which divides `p`.
This *could be* computable via the divisibility algorithm `Polynomial.decidableDvdMonic`,
as shown by `Polynomial.rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero` which has a computable RHS. -/
def rootMultiplicity (a : R) (p : R[X]) : ℕ :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h0 : p = 0 then 0
else
let _ : DecidablePred fun n : ℕ => ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p := fun n =>
have := decidableDvdMonic p ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow (n + 1))
inferInstanceAs (Decidable ¬_)
Nat.find (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a h0)
/- Porting note: added the following due to diamond with decidableProp and
decidableDvdMonic see also [Zulip]
(https://leanprover.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/287929-mathlib4/topic/non-defeq.20aliased.20instance) -/
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_nat_find_of_nonzero [DecidableEq R] {p : R[X]} (p0 : p ≠ 0) {a : R} :
letI : DecidablePred fun n : ℕ => ¬(X - C a) ^ (n + 1) ∣ p := fun n =>
have := decidableDvdMonic p ((monic_X_sub_C a).pow (n + 1))
inferInstanceAs (Decidable ¬_)
rootMultiplicity a p = Nat.find (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a p0) := by
dsimp [rootMultiplicity]
cases Subsingleton.elim ‹DecidableEq R› (Classical.decEq R)
rw [dif_neg p0]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity [DecidableEq R]
(p : R[X]) (a : R) :
rootMultiplicity a p =
if p = 0 then 0 else multiplicity (X - C a) p := by
simp only [rootMultiplicity, multiplicity, emultiplicity]
split
· rfl
rename_i h
simp only [finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a h, ↓reduceDIte]
rw [← ENat.some_eq_coe, WithTop.untopD_coe]
congr
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_zero {x : R} : rootMultiplicity x 0 = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_C (r a : R) : rootMultiplicity a (C r) = 0 := by
cases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R
· rw [Subsingleton.elim (C r) 0, rootMultiplicity_zero]
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity]
split_ifs with hr
· rfl
have h : natDegree (C r) < natDegree (X - C a) := by simp
simp_rw [multiplicity_eq_zero.mpr ((monic_X_sub_C a).not_dvd_of_natDegree_lt hr h)]
theorem pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd (p : R[X]) (a : R) : (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p ∣ p :=
letI := Classical.decEq R
if h : p = 0 then by simp [h]
else by
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg h]; apply pow_multiplicity_dvd
theorem pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq (p : R[X]) (a : R) :
(X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p * (p /ₘ (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p) = p := by
have : Monic ((X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p) := (monic_X_sub_C _).pow _
conv_rhs =>
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p this,
(modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd this).2 (pow_rootMultiplicity_dvd _ _)]
simp
theorem exists_eq_pow_rootMultiplicity_mul_and_not_dvd (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) (a : R) :
∃ q : R[X], p = (X - C a) ^ p.rootMultiplicity a * q ∧ ¬ (X - C a) ∣ q := by
classical
rw [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg hp]
apply (finiteMultiplicity_X_sub_C a hp).exists_eq_pow_mul_and_not_dvd
end multiplicity
end Ring
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] {p p₁ p₂ q : R[X]}
@[simp]
theorem modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval (p : R[X]) (a : R) : p %ₘ (X - C a) = C (p.eval a) := by
nontriviality R
have h : (p %ₘ (X - C a)).eval a = p.eval a := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div _ (monic_X_sub_C a), eval_sub, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_X,
eval_C, sub_self, zero_mul, sub_zero]
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) < 1 :=
degree_X_sub_C a ▸ degree_modByMonic_lt p (monic_X_sub_C a)
have : degree (p %ₘ (X - C a)) ≤ 0 := by
revert this
cases degree (p %ₘ (X - C a))
· exact fun _ => bot_le
· exact fun h => WithBot.coe_le_coe.2 (Nat.le_of_lt_succ (WithBot.coe_lt_coe.1 h))
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, eval_C] at h
rw [eq_C_of_degree_le_zero this, h]
theorem mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot : (X - C a) * (p /ₘ (X - C a)) = p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
.trans
⟨fun h => by rw [← h, eval_mul, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C, sub_self, zero_mul],
fun h => by
conv_rhs =>
rw [← modByMonic_add_div p (monic_X_sub_C a)]
rw [modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, h, C_0, zero_add]⟩
IsRoot.def.symm
theorem dvd_iff_isRoot : X - C a ∣ p ↔ IsRoot p a :=
⟨fun h => by
rwa [← modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd (monic_X_sub_C _), modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, ← C_0,
C_inj] at h,
fun h => ⟨p /ₘ (X - C a), by rw [mul_divByMonic_eq_iff_isRoot.2 h]⟩⟩
theorem X_sub_C_dvd_sub_C_eval : X - C a ∣ p - C (p.eval a) := by
rw [dvd_iff_isRoot, IsRoot, eval_sub, eval_C, sub_self]
-- TODO: generalize this to Ring. In general, 0 can be replaced by any element in the center of R.
theorem modByMonic_X (p : R[X]) : p %ₘ X = C (p.eval 0) := by
rw [← modByMonic_X_sub_C_eq_C_eval, C_0, sub_zero]
theorem eval₂_modByMonic_eq_self_of_root [CommRing S] {f : R →+* S} {p q : R[X]} (hq : q.Monic)
{x : S} (hx : q.eval₂ f x = 0) : (p %ₘ q).eval₂ f x = p.eval₂ f x := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_sub_mul_div p hq, eval₂_sub, eval₂_mul, hx, zero_mul, sub_zero]
theorem sub_dvd_eval_sub (a b : R) (p : R[X]) : a - b ∣ p.eval a - p.eval b := by
suffices X - C b ∣ p - C (p.eval b) by
simpa only [coe_evalRingHom, eval_sub, eval_X, eval_C] using (evalRingHom a).map_dvd this
simp [dvd_iff_isRoot]
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_zero_iff {p : R[X]} {x : R} :
rootMultiplicity x p = 0 ↔ IsRoot p x → p = 0 := by
classical
simp only [rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, ite_eq_left_iff,
Nat.cast_zero, multiplicity_eq_zero, dvd_iff_isRoot, not_imp_not]
theorem rootMultiplicity_eq_zero {p : R[X]} {x : R} (h : ¬IsRoot p x) : rootMultiplicity x p = 0 :=
rootMultiplicity_eq_zero_iff.2 fun h' => (h h').elim
@[simp]
theorem rootMultiplicity_pos' {p : R[X]} {x : R} :
0 < rootMultiplicity x p ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p x := by
rw [pos_iff_ne_zero, Ne, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero_iff, Classical.not_imp, and_comm]
theorem rootMultiplicity_pos {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) {x : R} :
0 < rootMultiplicity x p ↔ IsRoot p x :=
rootMultiplicity_pos'.trans (and_iff_right hp)
theorem eval_divByMonic_pow_rootMultiplicity_ne_zero {p : R[X]} (a : R) (hp : p ≠ 0) :
eval a (p /ₘ (X - C a) ^ rootMultiplicity a p) ≠ 0 := by
classical
haveI : Nontrivial R := Nontrivial.of_polynomial_ne hp
rw [Ne, ← IsRoot, ← dvd_iff_isRoot]
rintro ⟨q, hq⟩
have := pow_mul_divByMonic_rootMultiplicity_eq p a
rw [hq, ← mul_assoc, ← pow_succ, rootMultiplicity_eq_multiplicity, if_neg hp] at this
exact
(finiteMultiplicity_of_degree_pos_of_monic
(show (0 : WithBot ℕ) < degree (X - C a) by rw [degree_X_sub_C]; decide)
(monic_X_sub_C _) hp).not_pow_dvd_of_multiplicity_lt
(Nat.lt_succ_self _) (dvd_of_mul_right_eq _ this)
/-- See `Polynomial.self_mul_modByMonic` for the other multiplication order. This version, unlike
that one, requires commutativity. -/
@[simp]
lemma mul_self_modByMonic (hq : q.Monic) : (p * q) %ₘ q = 0 := by
rw [modByMonic_eq_zero_iff_dvd hq]
exact dvd_mul_left q p
lemma modByMonic_eq_of_dvd_sub (hq : q.Monic) (h : q ∣ p₁ - p₂) : p₁ %ₘ q = p₂ %ₘ q := by
nontriviality R
obtain ⟨f, sub_eq⟩ := h
refine (div_modByMonic_unique (p₂ /ₘ q + f) _ hq ⟨?_, degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq⟩).2
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add.mp sub_eq, mul_add, ← add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, add_comm]
lemma add_modByMonic (p₁ p₂ : R[X]) : (p₁ + p₂) %ₘ q = p₁ %ₘ q + p₂ %ₘ q := by
by_cases hq : q.Monic
· rcases subsingleton_or_nontrivial R with hR | hR
· simp only [eq_iff_true_of_subsingleton]
· exact
(div_modByMonic_unique (p₁ /ₘ q + p₂ /ₘ q) _ hq
⟨by
| rw [mul_add, add_left_comm, add_assoc, modByMonic_add_div _ hq, ← add_assoc,
add_comm (q * _), modByMonic_add_div _ hq],
(degree_add_le _ _).trans_lt
(max_lt (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq) (degree_modByMonic_lt _ hq))⟩).2
· simp_rw [modByMonic_eq_of_not_monic _ hq]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Div.lean | 676 | 680 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Patrick Massot. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecificLimits.Basic
/-!
# Hofer's lemma
This is an elementary lemma about complete metric spaces. It is motivated by an
application to the bubbling-off analysis for holomorphic curves in symplectic topology.
We are *very* far away from having these applications, but the proof here is a nice
example of a proof needing to construct a sequence by induction in the middle of the proof.
## References:
* H. Hofer and C. Viterbo, *The Weinstein conjecture in the presence of holomorphic spheres*
-/
open Topology Filter Finset
local notation "d" => dist
theorem hofer {X : Type*} [MetricSpace X] [CompleteSpace X] (x : X) (ε : ℝ) (ε_pos : 0 < ε)
{ϕ : X → ℝ} (cont : Continuous ϕ) (nonneg : ∀ y, 0 ≤ ϕ y) : ∃ ε' > 0, ∃ x' : X,
ε' ≤ ε ∧ d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ ε * ϕ x ≤ ε' * ϕ x' ∧ ∀ y, d x' y ≤ ε' → ϕ y ≤ 2 * ϕ x' := by
by_contra H
have reformulation : ∀ (x') (k : ℕ), ε * ϕ x ≤ ε / 2 ^ k * ϕ x' ↔ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' := by
intro x' k
rw [div_mul_eq_mul_div, le_div_iff₀, mul_assoc, mul_le_mul_left ε_pos, mul_comm]
positivity
| -- Now let's specialize to `ε/2^k`
replace H : ∀ k : ℕ, ∀ x', d x' x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ k * ϕ x ≤ ϕ x' →
∃ y, d x' y ≤ ε / 2 ^ k ∧ 2 * ϕ x' < ϕ y := by
intro k x'
push_neg at H
have := H (ε / 2 ^ k) (by positivity) x' (div_le_self ε_pos.le <| one_le_pow₀ one_le_two)
simpa [reformulation] using this
haveI : Nonempty X := ⟨x⟩
choose! F hF using H
-- Use the axiom of choice
-- Now define u by induction starting at x, with u_{n+1} = F(n, u_n)
let u : ℕ → X := fun n => Nat.recOn n x F
-- The properties of F translate to properties of u
have hu :
∀ n,
d (u n) x ≤ 2 * ε ∧ 2 ^ n * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u n) →
d (u n) (u <| n + 1) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u <| n + 1) := by
exact fun n ↦ hF n (u n)
-- Key properties of u, to be proven by induction
have key : ∀ n, d (u n) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ε / 2 ^ n ∧ 2 * ϕ (u n) < ϕ (u (n + 1)) := by
intro n
induction n using Nat.case_strong_induction_on with
| hz => simpa [u, ε_pos.le] using hu 0
| hi n IH =>
have A : d (u (n + 1)) x ≤ 2 * ε := by
rw [dist_comm]
let r := range (n + 1) -- range (n+1) = {0, ..., n}
calc
d (u 0) (u (n + 1)) ≤ ∑ i ∈ r, d (u i) (u <| i + 1) := dist_le_range_sum_dist u (n + 1)
_ ≤ ∑ i ∈ r, ε / 2 ^ i :=
(sum_le_sum fun i i_in => (IH i <| Nat.lt_succ_iff.mp <| Finset.mem_range.mp i_in).1)
_ = (∑ i ∈ r, (1 / 2 : ℝ) ^ i) * ε := by
rw [Finset.sum_mul]
field_simp
_ ≤ 2 * ε := by gcongr; apply sum_geometric_two_le
have B : 2 ^ (n + 1) * ϕ x ≤ ϕ (u (n + 1)) := by
refine @geom_le (ϕ ∘ u) _ zero_le_two (n + 1) fun m hm => ?_
exact (IH _ <| Nat.lt_add_one_iff.1 hm).2.le
exact hu (n + 1) ⟨A, B⟩
obtain ⟨key₁, key₂⟩ := forall_and.mp key
-- Hence u is Cauchy
have cauchy_u : CauchySeq u := by
refine cauchySeq_of_le_geometric _ ε one_half_lt_one fun n => ?_
simpa only [one_div, inv_pow] using key₁ n
-- So u converges to some y
obtain ⟨y, limy⟩ : ∃ y, Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 y) := CompleteSpace.complete cauchy_u
-- And ϕ ∘ u goes to +∞
have lim_top : Tendsto (ϕ ∘ u) atTop atTop := by
let v n := (ϕ ∘ u) (n + 1)
suffices Tendsto v atTop atTop by rwa [tendsto_add_atTop_iff_nat] at this
have hv₀ : 0 < v 0 := by
calc
0 ≤ 2 * ϕ (u 0) := by specialize nonneg x; positivity
_ < ϕ (u (0 + 1)) := key₂ 0
apply tendsto_atTop_of_geom_le hv₀ one_lt_two
exact fun n => (key₂ (n + 1)).le
-- But ϕ ∘ u also needs to go to ϕ(y)
have lim : Tendsto (ϕ ∘ u) atTop (𝓝 (ϕ y)) := Tendsto.comp cont.continuousAt limy
-- So we have our contradiction!
exact not_tendsto_atTop_of_tendsto_nhds lim lim_top
| Mathlib/Analysis/Hofer.lean | 33 | 104 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Thomas Browning. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Thomas Browning
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.GroupWithZero.Finset
import Mathlib.Algebra.GroupWithZero.Subgroup
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Card
import Mathlib.Data.Finite.Prod
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Coset.Card
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Quotient
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.QuotientGroup.Basic
/-!
# Index of a Subgroup
In this file we define the index of a subgroup, and prove several divisibility properties.
Several theorems proved in this file are known as Lagrange's theorem.
## Main definitions
- `H.index` : the index of `H : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the index is infinite.
- `H.relindex K` : the relative index of `H : Subgroup G` in `K : Subgroup G` as a natural number,
and returns 0 if the relative index is infinite.
# Main results
- `card_mul_index` : `Nat.card H * H.index = Nat.card G`
- `index_mul_card` : `H.index * Fintype.card H = Fintype.card G`
- `index_dvd_card` : `H.index ∣ Fintype.card G`
- `relindex_mul_index` : If `H ≤ K`, then `H.relindex K * K.index = H.index`
- `index_dvd_of_le` : If `H ≤ K`, then `K.index ∣ H.index`
- `relindex_mul_relindex` : `relindex` is multiplicative in towers
- `MulAction.index_stabilizer`: the index of the stabilizer is the cardinality of the orbit
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open scoped Pointwise
namespace Subgroup
open Cardinal Function
variable {G G' : Type*} [Group G] [Group G'] (H K L : Subgroup G)
/-- The index of a subgroup as a natural number. Returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "The index of an additive subgroup as a natural number.
Returns 0 if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def index : ℕ :=
Nat.card (G ⧸ H)
/-- If `H` and `K` are subgroups of a group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ` is the index
of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite. -/
@[to_additive "If `H` and `K` are subgroups of an additive group `G`, then `relindex H K : ℕ`
is the index of `H ∩ K` in `K`. The function returns `0` if the index is infinite."]
noncomputable def relindex : ℕ :=
(H.subgroupOf K).index
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap_of_surjective {f : G' →* G} (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
(H.comap f).index = H.index := by
have key : ∀ x y : G',
QuotientGroup.leftRel (H.comap f) x y ↔ QuotientGroup.leftRel H (f x) (f y) := by
simp only [QuotientGroup.leftRel_apply]
exact fun x y => iff_of_eq (congr_arg (· ∈ H) (by rw [f.map_mul, f.map_inv]))
refine Cardinal.toNat_congr (Equiv.ofBijective (Quotient.map' f fun x y => (key x y).mp) ⟨?_, ?_⟩)
· simp_rw [← Quotient.eq''] at key
refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
refine Quotient.ind' fun y => ?_
exact (key x y).mpr
· refine Quotient.ind' fun x => ?_
obtain ⟨y, hy⟩ := hf x
exact ⟨y, (Quotient.map'_mk'' f _ y).trans (congr_arg Quotient.mk'' hy)⟩
@[to_additive]
theorem index_comap (f : G' →* G) :
(H.comap f).index = H.relindex f.range :=
Eq.trans (congr_arg index (by rfl))
((H.subgroupOf f.range).index_comap_of_surjective f.rangeRestrict_surjective)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_comap (f : G' →* G) (K : Subgroup G') :
relindex (comap f H) K = relindex H (map f K) := by
rw [relindex, subgroupOf, comap_comap, index_comap, ← f.map_range, K.range_subtype]
variable {H K L}
@[to_additive relindex_mul_index]
theorem relindex_mul_index (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K * K.index = H.index :=
((mul_comm _ _).trans (Cardinal.toNat_mul _ _).symm).trans
(congr_arg Cardinal.toNat (Equiv.cardinal_eq (quotientEquivProdOfLE h))).symm
@[to_additive]
theorem index_dvd_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : K.index ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_left_eq (H.relindex K) (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_le (h : H ≤ K) : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
dvd_of_mul_right_eq K.index (relindex_mul_index h)
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_subgroupOf (hKL : K ≤ L) :
(H.subgroupOf L).relindex (K.subgroupOf L) = H.relindex K :=
((index_comap (H.subgroupOf L) (inclusion hKL)).trans (congr_arg _ (inclusion_range hKL))).symm
variable (H K L)
@[to_additive relindex_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_mul_relindex (hHK : H ≤ K) (hKL : K ≤ L) :
H.relindex K * K.relindex L = H.relindex L := by
rw [← relindex_subgroupOf hKL]
exact relindex_mul_index fun x hx => hHK hx
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_right : (H ⊓ K).relindex K = H.relindex K := by
rw [relindex, relindex, inf_subgroupOf_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem inf_relindex_left : (H ⊓ K).relindex H = K.relindex H := by
rw [inf_comm, inf_relindex_right]
@[to_additive relindex_inf_mul_relindex]
theorem relindex_inf_mul_relindex : H.relindex (K ⊓ L) * K.relindex L = (H ⊓ K).relindex L := by
rw [← inf_relindex_right H (K ⊓ L), ← inf_relindex_right K L, ← inf_relindex_right (H ⊓ K) L,
inf_assoc, relindex_mul_relindex (H ⊓ (K ⊓ L)) (K ⊓ L) L inf_le_right inf_le_right]
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_right [K.Normal] : K.relindex (H ⊔ K) = K.relindex H :=
Nat.card_congr (QuotientGroup.quotientInfEquivProdNormalQuotient H K).toEquiv.symm
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem relindex_sup_left [K.Normal] : K.relindex (K ⊔ H) = K.relindex H := by
rw [sup_comm, relindex_sup_right]
@[to_additive]
theorem relindex_dvd_index_of_normal [H.Normal] : H.relindex K ∣ H.index :=
| relindex_sup_right K H ▸ relindex_dvd_index_of_le le_sup_right
| Mathlib/GroupTheory/Index.lean | 140 | 141 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Zhangir Azerbayev. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Eric Wieser, Zhangir Azerbayev
-/
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Sign
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.LinearIndependent.Defs
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Basis
/-!
# Alternating Maps
We construct the bundled function `AlternatingMap`, which extends `MultilinearMap` with all the
arguments of the same type.
## Main definitions
* `AlternatingMap R M N ι` is the space of `R`-linear alternating maps from `ι → M` to `N`.
* `f.map_eq_zero_of_eq` expresses that `f` is zero when two inputs are equal.
* `f.map_swap` expresses that `f` is negated when two inputs are swapped.
* `f.map_perm` expresses how `f` varies by a sign change under a permutation of its inputs.
* An `AddCommMonoid`, `AddCommGroup`, and `Module` structure over `AlternatingMap`s that
matches the definitions over `MultilinearMap`s.
* `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`, for permuting the elements within a family.
* `MultilinearMap.alternatization`, which makes an alternating map out of a non-alternating one.
* `AlternatingMap.curryLeft`, for binding the leftmost argument of an alternating map indexed
by `Fin n.succ`.
## Implementation notes
`AlternatingMap` is defined in terms of `map_eq_zero_of_eq`, as this is easier to work with than
using `map_swap` as a definition, and does not require `Neg N`.
`AlternatingMap`s are provided with a coercion to `MultilinearMap`, along with a set of
`norm_cast` lemmas that act on the algebraic structure:
* `AlternatingMap.coe_add`
* `AlternatingMap.coe_zero`
* `AlternatingMap.coe_sub`
* `AlternatingMap.coe_neg`
* `AlternatingMap.coe_smul`
-/
-- semiring / add_comm_monoid
variable {R : Type*} [Semiring R]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {N : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N] [Module R N]
variable {P : Type*} [AddCommMonoid P] [Module R P]
-- semiring / add_comm_group
variable {M' : Type*} [AddCommGroup M'] [Module R M']
variable {N' : Type*} [AddCommGroup N'] [Module R N']
variable {ι ι' ι'' : Type*}
section
variable (R M N ι)
/-- An alternating map from `ι → M` to `N`, denoted `M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N`,
is a multilinear map that vanishes when two of its arguments are equal. -/
structure AlternatingMap extends MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N where
/-- The map is alternating: if `v` has two equal coordinates, then `f v = 0`. -/
map_eq_zero_of_eq' : ∀ (v : ι → M) (i j : ι), v i = v j → i ≠ j → toFun v = 0
@[inherit_doc]
notation M " [⋀^" ι "]→ₗ[" R "] " N:100 => AlternatingMap R M N ι
end
/-- The multilinear map associated to an alternating map -/
add_decl_doc AlternatingMap.toMultilinearMap
namespace AlternatingMap
variable (f f' : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N)
variable (g g₂ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N')
variable (g' : M' [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N')
variable (v : ι → M) (v' : ι → M')
open Function
/-! Basic coercion simp lemmas, largely copied from `RingHom` and `MultilinearMap` -/
section Coercions
instance instFunLike : FunLike (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (ι → M) N where
coe f := f.toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by
rcases f with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _⟩
rcases g with ⟨⟨_, _, _⟩, _⟩
congr
initialize_simps_projections AlternatingMap (toFun → apply)
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe : f.toFun = f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) (h) :
⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) = f :=
rfl
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N} (h : f = g) (x : ι → M) : f x = g x :=
congr_arg (fun h : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N => h x) h
protected theorem congr_arg (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) {x y : ι → M} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
congr_arg (fun x : ι → M => f x) h
theorem coe_injective : Injective ((↑) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N → (ι → M) → N) :=
DFunLike.coe_injective
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_inj {f g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N} : (f : (ι → M) → N) = g ↔ f = g :=
coe_injective.eq_iff
@[ext]
theorem ext {f f' : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N} (H : ∀ x, f x = f' x) : f = f' :=
DFunLike.ext _ _ H
attribute [coe] AlternatingMap.toMultilinearMap
instance coe : Coe (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) :=
⟨fun x => x.toMultilinearMap⟩
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_multilinearMap : ⇑(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) = f :=
rfl
theorem coe_multilinearMap_injective :
Function.Injective ((↑) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N → MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) :=
fun _ _ h => ext <| MultilinearMap.congr_fun h
theorem coe_multilinearMap_mk (f : (ι → M) → N) (h₁ h₂ h₃) :
((⟨⟨f, h₁, h₂⟩, h₃⟩ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) =
⟨f, @h₁, @h₂⟩ := by
simp
end Coercions
/-!
### Simp-normal forms of the structure fields
These are expressed in terms of `⇑f` instead of `f.toFun`.
-/
@[simp]
theorem map_update_add [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x y : M) :
f (update v i (x + y)) = f (update v i x) + f (update v i y) :=
f.map_update_add' v i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_add := map_update_add
@[simp]
theorem map_update_sub [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x y : M') :
g' (update v' i (x - y)) = g' (update v' i x) - g' (update v' i y) :=
g'.toMultilinearMap.map_update_sub v' i x y
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_sub := map_update_sub
@[simp]
theorem map_update_neg [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (x : M') :
g' (update v' i (-x)) = -g' (update v' i x) :=
g'.toMultilinearMap.map_update_neg v' i x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_neg := map_update_neg
@[simp]
theorem map_update_smul [DecidableEq ι] (i : ι) (r : R) (x : M) :
f (update v i (r • x)) = r • f (update v i x) :=
f.map_update_smul' v i r x
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-03")] protected alias map_smul := map_update_smul
@[simp]
theorem map_eq_zero_of_eq (v : ι → M) {i j : ι} (h : v i = v j) (hij : i ≠ j) : f v = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq' v i j h hij
theorem map_coord_zero {m : ι → M} (i : ι) (h : m i = 0) : f m = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_coord_zero i h
@[simp]
theorem map_update_zero [DecidableEq ι] (m : ι → M) (i : ι) : f (update m i 0) = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_update_zero m i
@[simp]
theorem map_zero [Nonempty ι] : f 0 = 0 :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_zero
theorem map_eq_zero_of_not_injective (v : ι → M) (hv : ¬Function.Injective v) : f v = 0 := by
rw [Function.Injective] at hv
push_neg at hv
rcases hv with ⟨i₁, i₂, heq, hne⟩
exact f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v heq hne
/-!
### Algebraic structure inherited from `MultilinearMap`
`AlternatingMap` carries the same `AddCommMonoid`, `AddCommGroup`, and `Module` structure
as `MultilinearMap`
-/
section SMul
variable {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
instance smul : SMul S (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨fun c f =>
{ c • (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j h hij => by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem smul_apply (c : S) (m : ι → M) : (c • f) m = c • f m :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_smul (c : S) : ↑(c • f) = c • (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) :=
rfl
theorem coeFn_smul (c : S) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : ⇑(c • f) = c • ⇑f :=
rfl
instance isCentralScalar [DistribMulAction Sᵐᵒᵖ N] [IsCentralScalar S N] :
IsCentralScalar S (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨fun _ _ => ext fun _ => op_smul_eq_smul _ _⟩
end SMul
/-- The cartesian product of two alternating maps, as an alternating map. -/
@[simps!]
def prod (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] P) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] (N × P) :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.prod g.toMultilinearMap with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ _ _ h hne =>
Prod.ext (f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ h hne) (g.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ h hne) }
@[simp]
theorem coe_prod (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] P) :
(f.prod g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) (N × P)) = MultilinearMap.prod f g :=
rfl
/-- Combine a family of alternating maps with the same domain and codomains `N i` into an
alternating map taking values in the space of functions `Π i, N i`. -/
@[simps!]
def pi {ι' : Type*} {N : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (N i)] [∀ i, Module R (N i)]
(f : ∀ i, M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N i) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] (∀ i, N i) :=
{ MultilinearMap.pi fun a => (f a).toMultilinearMap with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ _ _ h hne => funext fun a => (f a).map_eq_zero_of_eq _ h hne }
@[simp]
theorem coe_pi {ι' : Type*} {N : ι' → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (N i)] [∀ i, Module R (N i)]
(f : ∀ i, M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N i) :
(pi f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) (∀ i, N i)) = MultilinearMap.pi fun a => f a :=
rfl
/-- Given an alternating `R`-multilinear map `f` taking values in `R`, `f.smul_right z` is the map
sending `m` to `f m • z`. -/
@[simps!]
def smulRight {R M₁ M₂ ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] (f : M₁ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (z : M₂) : M₁ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] M₂ :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.smulRight z with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j h hne => by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hne] }
@[simp]
theorem coe_smulRight {R M₁ M₂ ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁] [AddCommMonoid M₂]
[Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] (f : M₁ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (z : M₂) :
(f.smulRight z : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M₁) M₂) = MultilinearMap.smulRight f z :=
rfl
instance add : Add (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨fun a b =>
{ (a + b : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j h hij => by
simp [a.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij, b.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem add_apply : (f + f') v = f v + f' v :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_add : (↑(f + f') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) = f + f' :=
rfl
instance zero : Zero (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨{ (0 : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ _ _ _ _ => by simp }⟩
@[simp]
theorem zero_apply : (0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) v = 0 :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_zero : ((0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N) = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_zero :
mk (0 : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι ↦ M) N) (0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N).2 = 0 :=
rfl
instance inhabited : Inhabited (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
⟨0⟩
instance addCommMonoid : AddCommMonoid (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
coe_injective.addCommMonoid _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _
instance neg : Neg (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N') :=
⟨fun f =>
{ -(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j h hij => by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem neg_apply (m : ι → M) : (-g) m = -g m :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_neg : ((-g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N') : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') = -g :=
rfl
instance sub : Sub (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N') :=
⟨fun f g =>
{ (f - g : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j h hij => by
simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij, g.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij] }⟩
@[simp]
theorem sub_apply (m : ι → M) : (g - g₂) m = g m - g₂ m :=
rfl
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sub : (↑(g - g₂) : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') = g - g₂ :=
rfl
instance addCommGroup : AddCommGroup (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N') :=
coe_injective.addCommGroup _ rfl (fun _ _ => rfl) (fun _ => rfl) (fun _ _ => rfl)
(fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _) fun _ _ => coeFn_smul _ _
section DistribMulAction
variable {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
instance distribMulAction : DistribMulAction S (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) where
one_smul _ := ext fun _ => one_smul _ _
mul_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => mul_smul _ _ _
smul_zero _ := ext fun _ => smul_zero _
smul_add _ _ _ := ext fun _ => smul_add _ _ _
end DistribMulAction
section Module
variable {S : Type*} [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
/-- The space of multilinear maps over an algebra over `R` is a module over `R`, for the pointwise
addition and scalar multiplication. -/
instance module : Module S (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) where
add_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ => add_smul _ _ _
zero_smul _ := ext fun _ => zero_smul _ _
instance noZeroSMulDivisors [NoZeroSMulDivisors S N] :
NoZeroSMulDivisors S (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :=
coe_injective.noZeroSMulDivisors _ rfl coeFn_smul
end Module
section
variable (R M N)
/-- The natural equivalence between linear maps from `M` to `N`
and `1`-multilinear alternating maps from `M` to `N`. -/
@[simps!]
def ofSubsingleton [Subsingleton ι] (i : ι) : (M →ₗ[R] N) ≃ (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) where
toFun f := ⟨MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M N i f, fun _ _ _ _ ↦ absurd (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩
invFun f := (MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M N i).symm f
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv _ := coe_multilinearMap_injective <|
(MultilinearMap.ofSubsingleton R M N i).apply_symm_apply _
variable (ι) {N}
/-- The constant map is alternating when `ι` is empty. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
def constOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] (m : N) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N :=
{ MultilinearMap.constOfIsEmpty R _ m with
toFun := Function.const _ m
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ => isEmptyElim }
end
/-- Restrict the codomain of an alternating map to a submodule. -/
@[simps]
def codRestrict (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (p : Submodule R N) (h : ∀ v, f v ∈ p) :
M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] p :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.codRestrict p h with
toFun := fun v => ⟨f v, h v⟩
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ _ _ hv hij => Subtype.ext <| map_eq_zero_of_eq _ _ hv hij }
end AlternatingMap
/-!
### Composition with linear maps
-/
namespace LinearMap
variable {S : Type*} {N₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid N₂] [Module R N₂]
/-- Composing an alternating map with a linear map on the left gives again an alternating map. -/
def compAlternatingMap (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N₂ where
__ := g.compMultilinearMap (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N)
map_eq_zero_of_eq' v i j h hij := by simp [f.map_eq_zero_of_eq v h hij]
@[simp]
theorem coe_compAlternatingMap (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
⇑(g.compAlternatingMap f) = g ∘ f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compAlternatingMap_apply (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (m : ι → M) :
g.compAlternatingMap f m = g (f m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compAlternatingMap_zero (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) :
g.compAlternatingMap (0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) = 0 :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => map_zero g
@[simp]
theorem zero_compAlternatingMap (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
(0 : N →ₗ[R] N₂).compAlternatingMap f = 0 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compAlternatingMap_add (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f₁ f₂ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
g.compAlternatingMap (f₁ + f₂) = g.compAlternatingMap f₁ + g.compAlternatingMap f₂ :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => map_add g _ _
@[simp]
theorem add_compAlternatingMap (g₁ g₂ : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
(g₁ + g₂).compAlternatingMap f = g₁.compAlternatingMap f + g₂.compAlternatingMap f := rfl
@[simp]
theorem compAlternatingMap_smul [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [DistribMulAction S N₂]
[SMulCommClass R S N] [SMulCommClass R S N₂] [CompatibleSMul N N₂ S R]
(g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (s : S) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
g.compAlternatingMap (s • f) = s • g.compAlternatingMap f :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => g.map_smul_of_tower _ _
@[simp]
theorem smul_compAlternatingMap [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N₂] [SMulCommClass R S N₂]
(g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (s : S) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
(s • g).compAlternatingMap f = s • g.compAlternatingMap f := rfl
variable (S) in
/-- `LinearMap.compAlternatingMap` as an `S`-linear map. -/
@[simps]
def compAlternatingMapₗ [Semiring S] [Module S N] [Module S N₂]
[SMulCommClass R S N] [SMulCommClass R S N₂] [LinearMap.CompatibleSMul N N₂ S R]
(g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) :
(M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) →ₗ[S] (M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N₂) where
toFun := g.compAlternatingMap
map_add' := g.compAlternatingMap_add
map_smul' := g.compAlternatingMap_smul
theorem smulRight_eq_comp {R M₁ M₂ ι : Type*} [CommSemiring R] [AddCommMonoid M₁]
[AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₁] [Module R M₂] (f : M₁ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] R) (z : M₂) :
f.smulRight z = (LinearMap.id.smulRight z).compAlternatingMap f :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem subtype_compAlternatingMap_codRestrict (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (p : Submodule R N)
(h) : p.subtype.compAlternatingMap (f.codRestrict p h) = f :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem compAlternatingMap_codRestrict (g : N →ₗ[R] N₂) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N)
(p : Submodule R N₂) (h) :
(g.codRestrict p h).compAlternatingMap f =
(g.compAlternatingMap f).codRestrict p fun v => h (f v) :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => rfl
end LinearMap
namespace AlternatingMap
variable {M₂ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₂] [Module R M₂]
variable {M₃ : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M₃] [Module R M₃]
/-- Composing an alternating map with the same linear map on each argument gives again an
alternating map. -/
def compLinearMap (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) : M₂ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N :=
{ (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N).compLinearMap fun _ => g with
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun _ _ _ h hij => f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (LinearMap.congr_arg h) hij }
theorem coe_compLinearMap (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) :
⇑(f.compLinearMap g) = f ∘ (g ∘ ·) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_apply (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (v : ι → M₂) :
f.compLinearMap g v = f fun i => g (v i) :=
rfl
/-- Composing an alternating map twice with the same linear map in each argument is
the same as composing with their composition. -/
theorem compLinearMap_assoc (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g₁ : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (g₂ : M₃ →ₗ[R] M₂) :
(f.compLinearMap g₁).compLinearMap g₂ = f.compLinearMap (g₁ ∘ₗ g₂) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem zero_compLinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) : (0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N).compLinearMap g = 0 := by
ext
simp only [compLinearMap_apply, zero_apply]
@[simp]
theorem add_compLinearMap (f₁ f₂ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) :
(f₁ + f₂).compLinearMap g = f₁.compLinearMap g + f₂.compLinearMap g := by
ext
simp only [compLinearMap_apply, add_apply]
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_zero [Nonempty ι] (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
f.compLinearMap (0 : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = 0 := by
ext
simp_rw [compLinearMap_apply, LinearMap.zero_apply, ← Pi.zero_def, map_zero, zero_apply]
/-- Composing an alternating map with the identity linear map in each argument. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearMap_id (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : f.compLinearMap LinearMap.id = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Composing with a surjective linear map is injective. -/
theorem compLinearMap_injective (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf : Function.Surjective f) :
Function.Injective fun g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N => g.compLinearMap f := fun g₁ g₂ h =>
ext fun x => by
simpa [Function.surjInv_eq hf] using AlternatingMap.ext_iff.mp h (Function.surjInv hf ∘ x)
theorem compLinearMap_inj (f : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) (hf : Function.Surjective f)
(g₁ g₂ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : g₁.compLinearMap f = g₂.compLinearMap f ↔ g₁ = g₂ :=
(compLinearMap_injective _ hf).eq_iff
section DomLcongr
variable (ι R N)
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
/-- Construct a linear equivalence between maps from a linear equivalence between domains. -/
@[simps apply]
def domLCongr (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃ₗ[S] (M₂ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) where
toFun f := f.compLinearMap e.symm
invFun g := g.compLinearMap e
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
left_inv f := AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => f.congr_arg <| funext fun _ => e.symm_apply_apply _
right_inv f := AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => f.congr_arg <| funext fun _ => e.apply_symm_apply _
@[simp]
theorem domLCongr_refl : domLCongr R N ι S (LinearEquiv.refl R M) = LinearEquiv.refl S _ :=
LinearEquiv.ext fun _ => AlternatingMap.ext fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem domLCongr_symm (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) : (domLCongr R N ι S e).symm = domLCongr R N ι S e.symm :=
rfl
theorem domLCongr_trans (e : M ≃ₗ[R] M₂) (f : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M₃) :
(domLCongr R N ι S e).trans (domLCongr R N ι S f) = domLCongr R N ι S (e.trans f) :=
rfl
end DomLcongr
/-- Composing an alternating map with the same linear equiv on each argument gives the zero map
if and only if the alternating map is the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem compLinearEquiv_eq_zero_iff (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) (g : M₂ ≃ₗ[R] M) :
f.compLinearMap (g : M₂ →ₗ[R] M) = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(domLCongr R N ι ℕ g.symm).map_eq_zero_iff
variable (f f' : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N)
variable (g g₂ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N')
variable (g' : M' [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N')
variable (v : ι → M) (v' : ι → M')
open Function
/-!
### Other lemmas from `MultilinearMap`
-/
section
theorem map_update_sum {α : Type*} [DecidableEq ι] (t : Finset α) (i : ι) (g : α → M) (m : ι → M) :
f (update m i (∑ a ∈ t, g a)) = ∑ a ∈ t, f (update m i (g a)) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.map_update_sum t i g m
end
/-!
### Theorems specific to alternating maps
Various properties of reordered and repeated inputs which follow from
`AlternatingMap.map_eq_zero_of_eq`.
-/
theorem map_update_self [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f (Function.update v i (v j)) = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (by rw [Function.update_self, Function.update_of_ne hij.symm]) hij
theorem map_update_update [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) (m : M) :
f (Function.update (Function.update v i m) j m) = 0 :=
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _
(by rw [Function.update_self, Function.update_of_ne hij, Function.update_self]) hij
theorem map_swap_add [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f (v ∘ Equiv.swap i j) + f v = 0 := by
rw [Equiv.comp_swap_eq_update]
convert f.map_update_update v hij (v i + v j)
simp [f.map_update_self _ hij, f.map_update_self _ hij.symm,
Function.update_comm hij (v i + v j) (v _) v, Function.update_comm hij.symm (v i) (v i) v]
theorem map_add_swap [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) :
f v + f (v ∘ Equiv.swap i j) = 0 := by
rw [add_comm]
exact f.map_swap_add v hij
theorem map_swap [DecidableEq ι] {i j : ι} (hij : i ≠ j) : g (v ∘ Equiv.swap i j) = -g v :=
eq_neg_of_add_eq_zero_left <| g.map_swap_add v hij
theorem map_perm [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (v : ι → M) (σ : Equiv.Perm ι) :
g (v ∘ σ) = Equiv.Perm.sign σ • g v := by
induction σ using Equiv.Perm.swap_induction_on' with
| one => simp
| mul_swap s x y hxy hI => simp_all [← Function.comp_assoc, g.map_swap]
theorem map_congr_perm [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (σ : Equiv.Perm ι) :
g v = Equiv.Perm.sign σ • g (v ∘ σ) := by
rw [g.map_perm, smul_smul]
simp
section DomDomCongr
/-- Transfer the arguments to a map along an equivalence between argument indices.
This is the alternating version of `MultilinearMap.domDomCongr`. -/
@[simps]
def domDomCongr (σ : ι ≃ ι') (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : M [⋀^ι']→ₗ[R] N :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.domDomCongr σ with
toFun := fun v => f (v ∘ σ)
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j hv hij =>
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq (v ∘ σ) (i := σ.symm i) (j := σ.symm j)
(by simpa using hv) (σ.symm.injective.ne hij) }
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_refl (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) : f.domDomCongr (Equiv.refl ι) = f := rfl
theorem domDomCongr_trans (σ₁ : ι ≃ ι') (σ₂ : ι' ≃ ι'') (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
f.domDomCongr (σ₁.trans σ₂) = (f.domDomCongr σ₁).domDomCongr σ₂ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_zero (σ : ι ≃ ι') : (0 : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N).domDomCongr σ = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_add (σ : ι ≃ ι') (f g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
(f + g).domDomCongr σ = f.domDomCongr σ + g.domDomCongr σ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_smul {S : Type*} [Monoid S] [DistribMulAction S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
(σ : ι ≃ ι') (c : S) (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
(c • f).domDomCongr σ = c • f.domDomCongr σ :=
rfl
/-- `AlternatingMap.domDomCongr` as an equivalence.
This is declared separately because it does not work with dot notation. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrEquiv (σ : ι ≃ ι') : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃+ M [⋀^ι']→ₗ[R] N where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv f := by
ext
simp [Function.comp_def]
right_inv m := by
ext
simp [Function.comp_def]
map_add' := domDomCongr_add σ
section DomDomLcongr
variable (S : Type*) [Semiring S] [Module S N] [SMulCommClass R S N]
/-- `AlternatingMap.domDomCongr` as a linear equivalence. -/
@[simps apply symm_apply]
def domDomCongrₗ (σ : ι ≃ ι') : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃ₗ[S] M [⋀^ι']→ₗ[R] N where
toFun := domDomCongr σ
invFun := domDomCongr σ.symm
left_inv f := by ext; simp [Function.comp_def]
right_inv m := by ext; simp [Function.comp_def]
map_add' := domDomCongr_add σ
map_smul' := domDomCongr_smul σ
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongrₗ_refl :
(domDomCongrₗ S (Equiv.refl ι) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃ₗ[S] M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) =
LinearEquiv.refl _ _ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongrₗ_toAddEquiv (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
(↑(domDomCongrₗ S σ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃ₗ[S] _) : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃+ _) =
domDomCongrEquiv σ :=
rfl
end DomDomLcongr
/-- The results of applying `domDomCongr` to two maps are equal if and only if those maps are. -/
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_iff (σ : ι ≃ ι') (f g : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
f.domDomCongr σ = g.domDomCongr σ ↔ f = g :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : _ ≃+ M [⋀^ι']→ₗ[R] N).apply_eq_iff_eq
@[simp]
theorem domDomCongr_eq_zero_iff (σ : ι ≃ ι') (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N) :
f.domDomCongr σ = 0 ↔ f = 0 :=
(domDomCongrEquiv σ : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N ≃+ M [⋀^ι']→ₗ[R] N).map_eq_zero_iff
theorem domDomCongr_perm [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι] (σ : Equiv.Perm ι) :
g.domDomCongr σ = Equiv.Perm.sign σ • g :=
AlternatingMap.ext fun v => g.map_perm v σ
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_domDomCongr (σ : ι ≃ ι') :
↑(f.domDomCongr σ) = (f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N).domDomCongr σ :=
MultilinearMap.ext fun _ => rfl
end DomDomCongr
/-- If the arguments are linearly dependent then the result is `0`. -/
theorem map_linearDependent {K : Type*} [Ring K] {M : Type*} [AddCommGroup M] [Module K M]
{N : Type*} [AddCommGroup N] [Module K N] [NoZeroSMulDivisors K N] (f : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[K] N)
(v : ι → M) (h : ¬LinearIndependent K v) : f v = 0 := by
obtain ⟨s, g, h, i, hi, hz⟩ := not_linearIndependent_iff.mp h
letI := Classical.decEq ι
suffices f (update v i (g i • v i)) = 0 by
rw [f.map_update_smul, Function.update_eq_self, smul_eq_zero] at this
exact Or.resolve_left this hz
rw [← Finset.insert_erase hi, Finset.sum_insert (s.not_mem_erase i), add_eq_zero_iff_eq_neg] at h
rw [h, f.map_update_neg, f.map_update_sum, neg_eq_zero]
apply Finset.sum_eq_zero
intro j hj
obtain ⟨hij, _⟩ := Finset.mem_erase.mp hj
rw [f.map_update_smul, f.map_update_self _ hij.symm, smul_zero]
section Fin
open Fin
/-- A version of `MultilinearMap.cons_add` for `AlternatingMap`. -/
theorem map_vecCons_add {n : ℕ} (f : M [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R] N) (m : Fin n → M) (x y : M) :
f (Matrix.vecCons (x + y) m) = f (Matrix.vecCons x m) + f (Matrix.vecCons y m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_add _ _ _
/-- A version of `MultilinearMap.cons_smul` for `AlternatingMap`. -/
theorem map_vecCons_smul {n : ℕ} (f : M [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R] N) (m : Fin n → M) (c : R)
(x : M) : f (Matrix.vecCons (c • x) m) = c • f (Matrix.vecCons x m) :=
f.toMultilinearMap.cons_smul _ _ _
end Fin
end AlternatingMap
namespace MultilinearMap
open Equiv
variable [Fintype ι] [DecidableEq ι]
private theorem alternization_map_eq_zero_of_eq_aux (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N')
(v : ι → M) (i j : ι) (i_ne_j : i ≠ j) (hv : v i = v j) :
(∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ) v = 0 := by
rw [sum_apply]
exact
Finset.sum_involution (fun σ _ => swap i j * σ)
(fun σ _ => by simp [Perm.sign_swap i_ne_j, apply_swap_eq_self hv])
(fun σ _ _ => (not_congr swap_mul_eq_iff).mpr i_ne_j) (fun σ _ => Finset.mem_univ _)
fun σ _ => swap_mul_involutive i j σ
/-- Produce an `AlternatingMap` out of a `MultilinearMap`, by summing over all argument
permutations. -/
def alternatization : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N' →+ M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N' where
toFun m :=
{ ∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ with
toFun := ⇑(∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ)
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j hvij hij =>
alternization_map_eq_zero_of_eq_aux m v i j hij hvij }
map_add' a b := by
ext
simp only [mk_coe, AlternatingMap.coe_mk, sum_apply, smul_apply, domDomCongr_apply, add_apply,
smul_add, Finset.sum_add_distrib, AlternatingMap.add_apply]
map_zero' := by
ext
simp only [mk_coe, AlternatingMap.coe_mk, sum_apply, smul_apply, domDomCongr_apply,
zero_apply, smul_zero, Finset.sum_const_zero, AlternatingMap.zero_apply]
theorem alternatization_def (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') :
⇑(alternatization m) = (∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ :) :=
rfl
theorem alternatization_coe (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') :
↑(alternatization m) = (∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ :) :=
coe_injective rfl
theorem alternatization_apply (m : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') (v : ι → M) :
alternatization m v = ∑ σ : Perm ι, Equiv.Perm.sign σ • m.domDomCongr σ v := by
simp only [alternatization_def, smul_apply, sum_apply]
end MultilinearMap
namespace AlternatingMap
/-- Alternatizing a multilinear map that is already alternating results in a scale factor of `n!`,
where `n` is the number of inputs. -/
theorem coe_alternatization [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι] (a : M [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R] N') :
MultilinearMap.alternatization (a : MultilinearMap R (fun _ => M) N')
= Nat.factorial (Fintype.card ι) • a := by
apply AlternatingMap.coe_injective
simp_rw [MultilinearMap.alternatization_def, ← coe_domDomCongr, domDomCongr_perm, coe_smul,
smul_smul, Int.units_mul_self, one_smul, Finset.sum_const, Finset.card_univ, Fintype.card_perm,
← coe_multilinearMap, coe_smul]
end AlternatingMap
namespace LinearMap
variable {N'₂ : Type*} [AddCommGroup N'₂] [Module R N'₂] [DecidableEq ι] [Fintype ι]
/-- Composition with a linear map before and after alternatization are equivalent. -/
theorem compMultilinearMap_alternatization (g : N' →ₗ[R] N'₂)
(f : MultilinearMap R (fun _ : ι => M) N') :
MultilinearMap.alternatization (g.compMultilinearMap f)
= g.compAlternatingMap (MultilinearMap.alternatization f) := by
ext
simp [MultilinearMap.alternatization_def]
end LinearMap
section Basis
open AlternatingMap
variable {ι₁ : Type*} [Finite ι]
variable {R' : Type*} {N₁ N₂ : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid N₁] [AddCommMonoid N₂]
variable [Module R' N₁] [Module R' N₂]
/-- Two alternating maps indexed by a `Fintype` are equal if they are equal when all arguments
are distinct basis vectors. -/
theorem Basis.ext_alternating {f g : N₁ [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R'] N₂} (e : Basis ι₁ R' N₁)
(h : ∀ v : ι → ι₁, Function.Injective v → (f fun i => e (v i)) = g fun i => e (v i)) :
f = g := by
classical
refine AlternatingMap.coe_multilinearMap_injective (Basis.ext_multilinear e fun v => ?_)
by_cases hi : Function.Injective v
· exact h v hi
· have : ¬Function.Injective fun i => e (v i) := hi.imp Function.Injective.of_comp
rw [coe_multilinearMap, coe_multilinearMap, f.map_eq_zero_of_not_injective _ this,
g.map_eq_zero_of_not_injective _ this]
end Basis
/-! ### Currying -/
section Currying
variable {R' : Type*} {M'' M₂'' N'' N₂'' : Type*} [CommSemiring R'] [AddCommMonoid M'']
[AddCommMonoid M₂''] [AddCommMonoid N''] [AddCommMonoid N₂''] [Module R' M''] [Module R' M₂'']
[Module R' N''] [Module R' N₂'']
namespace AlternatingMap
/-- Given an alternating map `f` in `n+1` variables, split the first variable to obtain
a linear map into alternating maps in `n` variables, given by `x ↦ (m ↦ f (Matrix.vecCons x m))`.
It can be thought of as a map $Hom(\bigwedge^{n+1} M, N) \to Hom(M, Hom(\bigwedge^n M, N))$.
This is `MultilinearMap.curryLeft` for `AlternatingMap`. See also
`AlternatingMap.curryLeftLinearMap`. -/
@[simps]
def curryLeft {n : ℕ} (f : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') :
M'' →ₗ[R'] M'' [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[R'] N'' where
toFun m :=
{ f.toMultilinearMap.curryLeft m with
toFun := fun v => f (Matrix.vecCons m v)
map_eq_zero_of_eq' := fun v i j hv hij =>
f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (by
rwa [Matrix.cons_val_succ, Matrix.cons_val_succ]) ((Fin.succ_injective _).ne hij) }
map_add' _ _ := ext fun _ => f.map_vecCons_add _ _ _
map_smul' _ _ := ext fun _ => f.map_vecCons_smul _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_zero {n : ℕ} : curryLeft (0 : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') = 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_add {n : ℕ} (f g : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') :
curryLeft (f + g) = curryLeft f + curryLeft g :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_smul {n : ℕ} (r : R') (f : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') :
curryLeft (r • f) = r • curryLeft f :=
rfl
/-- `AlternatingMap.curryLeft` as a `LinearMap`. This is a separate definition as dot notation
does not work for this version. -/
@[simps]
def curryLeftLinearMap {n : ℕ} :
(M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') →ₗ[R'] M'' →ₗ[R'] M'' [⋀^Fin n]→ₗ[R'] N'' where
toFun f := f.curryLeft
map_add' := curryLeft_add
map_smul' := curryLeft_smul
/-- Currying with the same element twice gives the zero map. -/
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_same {n : ℕ} (f : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') (m : M'') :
(f.curryLeft m).curryLeft m = 0 :=
ext fun _ => f.map_eq_zero_of_eq _ (by simp) Fin.zero_ne_one
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_compAlternatingMap {n : ℕ} (g : N'' →ₗ[R'] N₂'')
(f : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') (m : M'') :
(g.compAlternatingMap f).curryLeft m = g.compAlternatingMap (f.curryLeft m) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem curryLeft_compLinearMap {n : ℕ} (g : M₂'' →ₗ[R'] M'')
(f : M'' [⋀^Fin n.succ]→ₗ[R'] N'') (m : M₂'') :
(f.compLinearMap g).curryLeft m = (f.curryLeft (g m)).compLinearMap g :=
ext fun v => congr_arg f <| funext <| by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· rfl
· simp
/-- The space of constant maps is equivalent to the space of maps that are alternating with respect
to an empty family. -/
@[simps]
def constLinearEquivOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty ι] : N'' ≃ₗ[R'] (M'' [⋀^ι]→ₗ[R'] N'') where
toFun := AlternatingMap.constOfIsEmpty R' M'' ι
map_add' _ _ := rfl
map_smul' _ _ := rfl
invFun f := f 0
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv f := ext fun _ => AlternatingMap.congr_arg f <| Subsingleton.elim _ _
| end AlternatingMap
end Currying
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/Alternating/Basic.lean | 960 | 969 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.norm_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
|
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 578 | 589 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov, Patrick Massot, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.Basic
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.FundThmCalculus
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Integral.IntervalIntegral.IntegrationByParts
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Integral/IntervalIntegral.lean | 936 | 949 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Lattice
import Mathlib.Data.NNReal.Basic
import Mathlib.Topology.Metrizable.Basic
/-!
# Metrizable uniform spaces
In this file we prove that a uniform space with countably generated uniformity filter is
pseudometrizable: there exists a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure that generates the same uniformity.
The proof follows [Sergey Melikhov, Metrizable uniform spaces][melikhov2011].
## Main definitions
* `PseudoMetricSpace.ofPreNNDist`: given a function `d : X → X → ℝ≥0` such that `d x x = 0` and
`d x y = d y x` for all `x y : X`, constructs the maximal pseudo metric space structure such that
`NNDist x y ≤ d x y` for all `x y : X`.
* `UniformSpace.pseudoMetricSpace`: given a uniform space `X` with countably generated `𝓤 X`,
constructs a `PseudoMetricSpace X` instance that is compatible with the uniform space structure.
* `UniformSpace.metricSpace`: given a T₀ uniform space `X` with countably generated `𝓤 X`,
constructs a `MetricSpace X` instance that is compatible with the uniform space structure.
## Main statements
* `UniformSpace.metrizable_uniformity`: if `X` is a uniform space with countably generated `𝓤 X`,
then there exists a `PseudoMetricSpace` structure that is compatible with this `UniformSpace`
structure. Use `UniformSpace.pseudoMetricSpace` or `UniformSpace.metricSpace` instead.
* `UniformSpace.pseudoMetrizableSpace`: a uniform space with countably generated `𝓤 X` is pseudo
metrizable.
* `UniformSpace.metrizableSpace`: a T₀ uniform space with countably generated `𝓤 X` is
metrizable. This is not an instance to avoid loops.
## Tags
metrizable space, uniform space
-/
open Set Function Metric List Filter
open NNReal Filter Uniformity
variable {X : Type*}
namespace PseudoMetricSpace
/-- The maximal pseudo metric space structure on `X` such that `dist x y ≤ d x y` for all `x y`,
where `d : X → X → ℝ≥0` is a function such that `d x x = 0` and `d x y = d y x` for all `x`, `y`. -/
noncomputable def ofPreNNDist (d : X → X → ℝ≥0) (dist_self : ∀ x, d x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x) : PseudoMetricSpace X where
dist x y := ↑(⨅ l : List X, ((x::l).zipWith d (l ++ [y])).sum : ℝ≥0)
dist_self x := NNReal.coe_eq_zero.2 <|
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| (ciInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) []).trans_eq <| by simp [dist_self]
dist_comm x y :=
NNReal.coe_inj.2 <| by
refine reverse_surjective.iInf_congr _ fun l ↦ ?_
rw [← sum_reverse, reverse_zipWith, reverse_append, reverse_reverse,
reverse_singleton, singleton_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse,
zipWith_comm_of_comm dist_comm]
simp only [length, length_append]
dist_triangle x y z := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_add, NNReal.coe_le_coe]
refine NNReal.le_iInf_add_iInf fun lxy lyz ↦ ?_
calc
⨅ l, (zipWith d (x::l) (l ++ [z])).sum ≤
(zipWith d (x::lxy ++ y::lyz) ((lxy ++ y::lyz) ++ [z])).sum :=
ciInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) (lxy ++ y::lyz)
_ = (zipWith d (x::lxy) (lxy ++ [y])).sum + (zipWith d (y::lyz) (lyz ++ [z])).sum := by
rw [← sum_append, ← zipWith_append, cons_append, ← @singleton_append _ y, append_assoc,
append_assoc, append_assoc]
rw [length_cons, length_append, length_singleton]
theorem dist_ofPreNNDist (d : X → X → ℝ≥0) (dist_self : ∀ x, d x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x) (x y : X) :
@dist X (@PseudoMetricSpace.toDist X (PseudoMetricSpace.ofPreNNDist d dist_self dist_comm)) x
y =
↑(⨅ l : List X, ((x::l).zipWith d (l ++ [y])).sum : ℝ≥0) :=
rfl
theorem dist_ofPreNNDist_le (d : X → X → ℝ≥0) (dist_self : ∀ x, d x x = 0)
(dist_comm : ∀ x y, d x y = d y x) (x y : X) :
@dist X (@PseudoMetricSpace.toDist X (PseudoMetricSpace.ofPreNNDist d dist_self dist_comm)) x
y ≤
d x y :=
NNReal.coe_le_coe.2 <| (ciInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) []).trans_eq <| by simp
| /-- Consider a function `d : X → X → ℝ≥0` such that `d x x = 0` and `d x y = d y x` for all `x`,
`y`. Let `dist` be the largest pseudometric distance such that `dist x y ≤ d x y`, see
`PseudoMetricSpace.ofPreNNDist`. Suppose that `d` satisfies the following triangle-like
inequality: `d x₁ x₄ ≤ 2 * max (d x₁ x₂, d x₂ x₃, d x₃ x₄)`. Then `d x y ≤ 2 * dist x y` for all
`x`, `y`. -/
theorem le_two_mul_dist_ofPreNNDist (d : X → X → ℝ≥0) (dist_self : ∀ x, d x x = 0)
| Mathlib/Topology/Metrizable/Uniformity.lean | 95 | 100 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Peter Nelson. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Peter Nelson
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Matroid.IndepAxioms
/-!
# Matroid Duality
For a matroid `M` on ground set `E`, the collection of complements of the bases of `M` is the
collection of bases of another matroid on `E` called the 'dual' of `M`.
The map from `M` to its dual is an involution, interacts nicely with minors,
and preserves many important matroid properties such as representability and connectivity.
This file defines the dual matroid `M✶` of `M`, and gives associated API. The definition
is in terms of its independent sets, using `IndepMatroid.matroid`.
We also define 'Co-independence' (independence in the dual) of a set as a predicate `M.Coindep X`.
This is an abbreviation for `M✶.Indep X`, but has its own name for the sake of dot notation.
## Main Definitions
* `M.Dual`, written `M✶`, is the matroid on `M.E` which a set `B ⊆ M.E` is a base if and only if
`M.E \ B` is a base for `M`.
* `M.Coindep X` means `M✶.Indep X`, or equivalently that `X` is contained in `M.E \ B` for some
base `B` of `M`.
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open Set
namespace Matroid
variable {α : Type*} {M : Matroid α} {I B X : Set α}
section dual
/-- Given `M : Matroid α`, the `IndepMatroid α` whose independent sets are
the subsets of `M.E` that are disjoint from some base of `M` -/
@[simps] def dualIndepMatroid (M : Matroid α) : IndepMatroid α where
E := M.E
Indep I := I ⊆ M.E ∧ ∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B
indep_empty := ⟨empty_subset M.E, M.exists_isBase.imp (fun _ hB ↦ ⟨hB, empty_disjoint _⟩)⟩
indep_subset := by
rintro I J ⟨hJE, B, hB, hJB⟩ hIJ
exact ⟨hIJ.trans hJE, ⟨B, hB, disjoint_of_subset_left hIJ hJB⟩⟩
indep_aug := by
rintro I X ⟨hIE, B, hB, hIB⟩ hI_not_max hX_max
have hXE := hX_max.1.1
have hB' := (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase hXE).mpr hX_max
set B' := M.E \ X with hX
have hI := (not_iff_not.mpr (isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase)).mpr hI_not_max
obtain ⟨B'', hB'', hB''₁, hB''₂⟩ := (hB'.indep.diff I).exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
rw [← compl_subset_compl, ← hIB.sdiff_eq_right, ← union_diff_distrib, diff_eq, compl_inter,
compl_compl, union_subset_iff, compl_subset_compl] at hB''₂
have hssu := (subset_inter (hB''₂.2) hIE).ssubset_of_ne
(by { rintro rfl; apply hI; convert hB''; simp [hB''.subset_ground] })
obtain ⟨e, ⟨(heB'' : e ∉ _), heE⟩, heI⟩ := exists_of_ssubset hssu
use e
simp_rw [mem_diff, insert_subset_iff, and_iff_left heI, and_iff_right heE, and_iff_right hIE]
refine ⟨by_contra (fun heX ↦ heB'' (hB''₁ ⟨?_, heI⟩)), ⟨B'', hB'', ?_⟩⟩
· rw [hX]; exact ⟨heE, heX⟩
rw [← union_singleton, disjoint_union_left, disjoint_singleton_left, and_iff_left heB'']
exact disjoint_of_subset_left hB''₂.2 disjoint_compl_left
indep_maximal := by
rintro X - I' ⟨hI'E, B, hB, hI'B⟩ hI'X
obtain ⟨I, hI⟩ := M.exists_isBasis (M.E \ X)
obtain ⟨B', hB', hIB', hB'IB⟩ := hI.indep.exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB
obtain rfl : I = B' \ X := hI.eq_of_subset_indep (hB'.indep.diff _)
(subset_diff.2 ⟨hIB', (subset_diff.1 hI.subset).2⟩)
(diff_subset_diff_left hB'.subset_ground)
simp_rw [maximal_subset_iff']
refine ⟨(X \ B') ∩ M.E, ?_, ⟨⟨inter_subset_right, ?_⟩, ?_⟩, ?_⟩
· rw [subset_inter_iff, and_iff_left hI'E, subset_diff, and_iff_right hI'X]
exact Disjoint.mono_right hB'IB <| disjoint_union_right.2
⟨disjoint_sdiff_right.mono_left hI'X , hI'B⟩
· exact ⟨B', hB', (disjoint_sdiff_left (t := X)).mono_left inter_subset_left⟩
· exact inter_subset_left.trans diff_subset
simp only [subset_inter_iff, subset_diff, and_imp, forall_exists_index]
refine fun J hJE B'' hB'' hdj hJX hXJ ↦ ⟨⟨hJX, ?_⟩, hJE⟩
have hI' : (B'' ∩ X) ∪ (B' \ X) ⊆ B' := by
rw [union_subset_iff, and_iff_left diff_subset, ← union_diff_cancel hJX,
inter_union_distrib_left, hdj.symm.inter_eq, empty_union, diff_eq, ← inter_assoc,
← diff_eq, diff_subset_comm, diff_eq, inter_assoc, ← diff_eq, inter_comm]
exact subset_trans (inter_subset_inter_right _ hB''.subset_ground) hXJ
obtain ⟨B₁,hB₁,hI'B₁,hB₁I⟩ := (hB'.indep.subset hI').exists_isBase_subset_union_isBase hB''
rw [union_comm, ← union_assoc, union_eq_self_of_subset_right inter_subset_left] at hB₁I
obtain rfl : B₁ = B' := by
refine hB₁.eq_of_subset_indep hB'.indep (fun e he ↦ ?_)
refine (hB₁I he).elim (fun heB'' ↦ ?_) (fun h ↦ h.1)
refine (em (e ∈ X)).elim (fun heX ↦ hI' (Or.inl ⟨heB'', heX⟩)) (fun heX ↦ hIB' ?_)
refine hI.mem_of_insert_indep ⟨hB₁.subset_ground he, heX⟩ ?_
exact hB₁.indep.subset (insert_subset he (subset_union_right.trans hI'B₁))
by_contra hdj'
obtain ⟨e, heJ, heB'⟩ := not_disjoint_iff.mp hdj'
obtain (heB'' | ⟨-,heX⟩ ) := hB₁I heB'
· exact hdj.ne_of_mem heJ heB'' rfl
exact heX (hJX heJ)
subset_ground := by tauto
/-- The dual of a matroid; the bases are the complements (w.r.t `M.E`) of the bases of `M`. -/
def dual (M : Matroid α) : Matroid α := M.dualIndepMatroid.matroid
/-- The `✶` symbol, which denotes matroid duality.
(This is distinct from the usual `*` symbol for multiplication, due to precedence issues.) -/
postfix:max "✶" => Matroid.dual
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists' : (M✶.Indep I) ↔ I ⊆ M.E ∧ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp] theorem dual_ground : M✶.E = M.E := rfl
theorem dual_indep_iff_exists (hI : I ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.Indep I ↔ (∃ B, M.IsBase B ∧ Disjoint I B) := by
rw [dual_indep_iff_exists', and_iff_right hI]
theorem dual_dep_iff_forall : (M✶.Dep I) ↔ (∀ B, M.IsBase B → (I ∩ B).Nonempty) ∧ I ⊆ M.E := by
simp_rw [dep_iff, dual_indep_iff_exists', dual_ground, and_congr_left_iff, not_and,
not_exists, not_and, not_disjoint_iff_nonempty_inter, Classical.imp_iff_right_iff,
iff_true_intro Or.inl]
instance dual_finite [M.Finite] : M✶.Finite :=
⟨M.ground_finite⟩
instance dual_nonempty [M.Nonempty] : M✶.Nonempty :=
⟨M.ground_nonempty⟩
@[simp] theorem dual_isBase_iff (hB : B ⊆ M.E := by aesop_mat) :
M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) := by
rw [isBase_compl_iff_maximal_disjoint_isBase, isBase_iff_maximal_indep, maximal_subset_iff,
maximal_subset_iff]
| simp [dual_indep_iff_exists', hB]
theorem dual_isBase_iff' : M✶.IsBase B ↔ M.IsBase (M.E \ B) ∧ B ⊆ M.E :=
(em (B ⊆ M.E)).elim (fun h ↦ by rw [dual_isBase_iff, and_iff_left h])
| Mathlib/Data/Matroid/Dual.lean | 142 | 145 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 1,492 | 1,499 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Yaël Dillies, Chenyi Li. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chenyi Li, Ziyu Wang, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.Basic
/-!
# Uniformly and strongly convex functions
In this file, we define uniformly convex functions and strongly convex functions.
For a real normed space `E`, a uniformly convex function with modulus `φ : ℝ → ℝ` is a function
`f : E → ℝ` such that `f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖`
for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
A `m`-strongly convex function is a uniformly convex function with modulus `fun r ↦ m / 2 * r ^ 2`.
If `E` is an inner product space, this is equivalent to `x ↦ f x - m / 2 * ‖x‖ ^ 2` being convex.
## TODO
Prove derivative properties of strongly convex functions.
-/
open Real
variable {E : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup E]
section NormedSpace
variable [NormedSpace ℝ E] {φ ψ : ℝ → ℝ} {s : Set E} {m : ℝ} {f g : E → ℝ}
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly convex with modulus `φ` if
`f (t • x + (1 - t) • y) ≤ t • f x + (1 - t) • f y - t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConvexOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
f (a • x + b • y) ≤ a • f x + b • f y - a * b * φ ‖x - y‖
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is uniformly concave with modulus `φ` if
`t • f x + (1 - t) • f y + t * (1 - t) * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (t • x + (1 - t) • y)` for all `t ∈ [0, 1]`.
`φ` is usually taken to be a monotone function such that `φ r = 0 ↔ r = 0`. -/
def UniformConcaveOn (s : Set E) (φ : ℝ → ℝ) (f : E → ℝ) : Prop :=
Convex ℝ s ∧ ∀ ⦃x⦄, x ∈ s → ∀ ⦃y⦄, y ∈ s → ∀ ⦃a b : ℝ⦄, 0 ≤ a → 0 ≤ b → a + b = 1 →
a • f x + b • f y + a * b * φ ‖x - y‖ ≤ f (a • x + b • y)
@[simp] lemma uniformConvexOn_zero : UniformConvexOn s 0 f ↔ ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConvexOn, ConvexOn]
@[simp] lemma uniformConcaveOn_zero : UniformConcaveOn s 0 f ↔ ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
simp [UniformConcaveOn, ConcaveOn]
protected alias ⟨_, ConvexOn.uniformConvexOn_zero⟩ := uniformConvexOn_zero
protected alias ⟨_, ConcaveOn.uniformConcaveOn_zero⟩ := uniformConcaveOn_zero
lemma UniformConvexOn.mono (hψφ : ψ ≤ φ) (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) : UniformConvexOn s ψ f :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans <| by gcongr; apply hψφ⟩
lemma UniformConcaveOn.mono (hψφ : ψ ≤ φ) (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) : UniformConcaveOn s ψ f :=
⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab).trans' <| by gcongr; apply hψφ⟩
lemma UniformConvexOn.convexOn (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hφ : 0 ≤ φ) : ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simpa using hf.mono hφ
lemma UniformConcaveOn.concaveOn (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hφ : 0 ≤ φ) : ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
simpa using hf.mono hφ
lemma UniformConvexOn.strictConvexOn (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hφ : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → 0 < φ r) :
StrictConvexOn ℝ s f := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab).trans_lt <|
sub_lt_self _ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_ne_zero, ← norm_pos_iff] at hxy
have := hφ _ hxy.ne'
positivity
lemma UniformConcaveOn.strictConcaveOn (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hφ : ∀ r, r ≠ 0 → 0 < φ r) :
StrictConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy hxy a b ha hb hab ↦ (hf.2 hx hy ha.le hb.le hab).trans_lt' <|
lt_add_of_pos_right _ ?_⟩
rw [← sub_ne_zero, ← norm_pos_iff] at hxy
have := hφ _ hxy.ne'
positivity
lemma UniformConvexOn.add (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hg : UniformConvexOn s ψ g) :
UniformConvexOn s (φ + ψ) (f + g) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [mul_add, add_add_add_comm, sub_add_sub_comm]
using add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
lemma UniformConcaveOn.add (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hg : UniformConcaveOn s ψ g) :
UniformConcaveOn s (φ + ψ) (f + g) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ ?_⟩
simpa [mul_add, add_add_add_comm] using add_le_add (hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab) (hg.2 hx hy ha hb hab)
lemma UniformConvexOn.neg (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) : UniformConcaveOn s φ (-f) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ le_of_neg_le_neg ?_⟩
simpa [add_comm, -neg_le_neg_iff, le_sub_iff_add_le'] using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
lemma UniformConcaveOn.neg (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) : UniformConvexOn s φ (-f) := by
refine ⟨hf.1, fun x hx y hy a b ha hb hab ↦ le_of_neg_le_neg ?_⟩
simpa [add_comm, -neg_le_neg_iff, ← le_sub_iff_add_le', sub_eq_add_neg, neg_add]
using hf.2 hx hy ha hb hab
lemma UniformConvexOn.sub (hf : UniformConvexOn s φ f) (hg : UniformConcaveOn s ψ g) :
UniformConvexOn s (φ + ψ) (f - g) := by simpa using hf.add hg.neg
lemma UniformConcaveOn.sub (hf : UniformConcaveOn s φ f) (hg : UniformConvexOn s ψ g) :
UniformConcaveOn s (φ + ψ) (f - g) := by simpa using hf.add hg.neg
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is `m`-strongly convex if it is uniformly convex with
modulus `φ(r) = m / 2 * r ^ 2`.
In an inner product space, this is equivalent to `x ↦ f x - m / 2 * ‖x‖ ^ 2` being convex. -/
def StrongConvexOn (s : Set E) (m : ℝ) : (E → ℝ) → Prop :=
UniformConvexOn s fun r ↦ m / (2 : ℝ) * r ^ 2
/-- A function `f` from a real normed space is `m`-strongly concave if is strongly concave with
modulus `φ(r) = m / 2 * r ^ 2`.
In an inner product space, this is equivalent to `x ↦ f x + m / 2 * ‖x‖ ^ 2` being concave. -/
def StrongConcaveOn (s : Set E) (m : ℝ) : (E → ℝ) → Prop :=
UniformConcaveOn s fun r ↦ m / (2 : ℝ) * r ^ 2
variable {s : Set E} {f : E → ℝ} {m n : ℝ}
nonrec lemma StrongConvexOn.mono (hmn : m ≤ n) (hf : StrongConvexOn s n f) : StrongConvexOn s m f :=
hf.mono fun r ↦ by gcongr
nonrec lemma StrongConcaveOn.mono (hmn : m ≤ n) (hf : StrongConcaveOn s n f) :
StrongConcaveOn s m f := hf.mono fun r ↦ by gcongr
@[simp] lemma strongConvexOn_zero : StrongConvexOn s 0 f ↔ ConvexOn ℝ s f := by
simp [StrongConvexOn, ← Pi.zero_def]
|
@[simp] lemma strongConcaveOn_zero : StrongConcaveOn s 0 f ↔ ConcaveOn ℝ s f := by
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Strong.lean | 136 | 137 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Cauchy
/-!
# Uniform convergence
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` (with values in a metric space) converges uniformly on a set `s` to a
function `f` if, for all `ε > 0`, for all large enough `n`, one has for all `y ∈ s` the inequality
`dist (f y, Fₙ y) < ε`. Under uniform convergence, many properties of the `Fₙ` pass to the limit,
most notably continuity. We prove this in the file, defining the notion of uniform convergence
in the more general setting of uniform spaces, and with respect to an arbitrary indexing set
endowed with a filter (instead of just `ℕ` with `atTop`).
## Main results
Let `α` be a topological space, `β` a uniform space, `Fₙ` and `f` be functions from `α` to `β`
(where the index `n` belongs to an indexing type `ι` endowed with a filter `p`).
* `TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s`: the fact that `Fₙ` converges uniformly to `f` on `s`. This means
that, for any entourage `u` of the diagonal, for large enough `n` (with respect to `p`), one has
`(f y, Fₙ y) ∈ u` for all `y ∈ s`.
* `TendstoUniformly F f p`: same notion with `s = univ`.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.continuousOn`: a uniform limit on a set of functions which are continuous
on this set is itself continuous on this set.
* `TendstoUniformly.continuous`: a uniform limit of continuous functions is continuous.
* `TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f` on a set `s`, and `gₙ` tends
to `x` within `s`, then `Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x` if `f` is continuous at `x` within `s`.
* `TendstoUniformly.tendsto_comp`: If `Fₙ` tends uniformly to `f`, and `gₙ` tends to `x`, then
`Fₙ gₙ` tends to `f x`.
Finally, we introduce the notion of a uniform Cauchy sequence, which is to uniform
convergence what a Cauchy sequence is to the usual notion of convergence.
## Implementation notes
We derive most of our initial results from an auxiliary definition `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter`.
This definition in and of itself can sometimes be useful, e.g., when studying the local behavior
of the `Fₙ` near a point, which would typically look like `TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓝 x)`.
Still, while this may be the "correct" definition (see
`tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter`), it is somewhat unwieldy to work with in
practice. Thus, we provide the more traditional definition in `TendstoUniformlyOn`.
## Tags
Uniform limit, uniform convergence, tends uniformly to
-/
noncomputable section
open Topology Uniformity Filter Set Uniform
variable {α β γ ι : Type*} [UniformSpace β]
variable {F : ι → α → β} {f : α → β} {s s' : Set α} {x : α} {p : Filter ι} {p' : Filter α}
/-!
### Different notions of uniform convergence
We define uniform convergence, on a set or in the whole space.
-/
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f`
with respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has
`p ×ˢ p'`-eventually `(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', (f n.snd, F n.fst n.snd) ∈ u
/--
A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a filter `p'` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ p'` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `p'`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓤 β) :=
Iff.rfl
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` with
respect to the filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x ∈ s`. -/
def TendstoUniformlyOn (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
apply forall₂_congr
simp_rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
simp
alias ⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOn⟩ :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly on a set `s` to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ 𝓟 s` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit besides it being in `s`.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔
Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` with respect to a
filter `p` if, for any entourage of the diagonal `u`, one has `p`-eventually
`(f x, Fₙ x) ∈ u` for all `x`. -/
def TendstoUniformly (F : ι → α → β) (f : α → β) (p : Filter ι) :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ n in p, ∀ x : α, (f x, F n x) ∈ u
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_univ : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p univ ↔ TendstoUniformly F f p := by
simp [TendstoUniformlyOn, TendstoUniformly]
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, principal_univ]
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p ⊤ := by rwa [← tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformly_comp_coe :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s ↔ TendstoUniformly (fun i (x : s) => F i x) (f ∘ (↑)) p :=
forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp
/-- A sequence of functions `Fₙ` converges uniformly to a limiting function `f` w.r.t.
filter `p` iff the function `(n, x) ↦ (f x, Fₙ x)` converges along `p ×ˢ ⊤` to the uniformity.
In other words: one knows nothing about the behavior of `x` in this limit.
-/
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ Tendsto (fun q : ι × α => (f q.2, F q.1 q.2)) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓤 β) := by
simp [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter, tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto]
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hx : 𝓟 {x} ≤ p') : Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) := by
refine Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.mpr fun u hu => mem_map.mpr ?_
filter_upwards [(h u hu).curry]
intro i h
simpa using h.filter_mono hx
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at
(le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr <| singleton_subset_iff.mpr <| hx)
/-- Uniform convergence implies pointwise convergence. -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_at (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (x : α) :
Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p <| 𝓝 (f x) :=
h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_at le_top
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p'' p' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p'' := fun u hu =>
(h u hu).filter_mono (p.prod_mono_right hp)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.mono (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (h' : s' ⊆ s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s' :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(h.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr h'))
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n : ι × α in p ×ˢ p', F n.fst n.snd = F' n.fst n.snd) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f p p' := by
refine fun u hu => ((hf u hu).and hff').mono fun n h => ?_
rw [← h.right]
exact h.left
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hff' : ∀ᶠ n in p, Set.EqOn (F n) (F' n) s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at hf ⊢
refine hf.congr ?_
rw [eventually_iff] at hff' ⊢
simp only [Set.EqOn] at hff'
simp only [mem_prod_principal, hff', mem_setOf_eq]
lemma tendstoUniformly_congr {F' : ι → α → β} (hF : F =ᶠ[p] F') :
TendstoUniformly F f p ↔ TendstoUniformly F' f p := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ] at *
have HF := EventuallyEq.exists_mem hF
exact ⟨fun h => h.congr (by aesop), fun h => h.congr (by simp_rw [eqOn_comm]; aesop)⟩
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.congr_right {g : α → β} (hf : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(hfg : EqOn f g s) : TendstoUniformlyOn F g p s := fun u hu => by
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with i hi a ha using hfg ha ▸ hi a ha
protected theorem TendstoUniformly.tendstoUniformlyOn (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
(tendstoUniformlyOn_univ.2 h).mono (subset_univ s)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMap tendsto_comap)
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.comp (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [TendstoUniformlyOn, comap_principal] using TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.comp h g
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem TendstoUniformly.comp (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (g : γ → α) :
TendstoUniformly (fun n => F n ∘ g) (f ∘ g) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h ⊢
simpa [principal_univ, comap_principal] using h.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a filter -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p p' := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform convergence on a set -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p s := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves uniform convergence -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) :
TendstoUniformly (fun i => g ∘ F i) (g ∘ f) p := fun _u hu => h _ (hg hu)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {q : Filter ι'} {q' : Filter α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q q') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ q)
(p' ×ˢ q') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_iff_tendsto] at h h' ⊢
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, ← map_swap4_prod, tendsto_map'_iff]
simpa using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s') :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p')
(s ×ˢ s') := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter] at h h' ⊢
simpa only [prod_principal_principal] using h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod_map := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{f' : α' → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (Prod.map f f') (p ×ˢ p') := by
rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, ← univ_prod_univ] at *
exact h.prodMap h'
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod_map := TendstoUniformly.prodMap
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {q : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p')
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F' f' q p') :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a))
(p ×ˢ q) p' :=
fun u hu => ((h.prodMap h') u hu).diag_of_prod_right
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prod := TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.prodMk
protected theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{f' : α → β'} {p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s)
(h' : TendstoUniformlyOn F' f' p' s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p')
s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformlyOn.prod := TendstoUniformlyOn.prodMk
theorem TendstoUniformly.prodMk {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'} {f' : α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h' : TendstoUniformly F' f' p') :
TendstoUniformly (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.1 a, F' i.2 a)) (fun a => (f a, f' a)) (p ×ˢ p') :=
(h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias TendstoUniformly.prod := TendstoUniformly.prodMk
/-- Uniform convergence on a filter `p'` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ p'`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_filter_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ p') (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F (fun _ => c) p p' := by
simp_rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]
rfl
/-- Uniform convergence on a set `s` to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in
`p ×ˢ 𝓟 s`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_principal_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ 𝓟 s) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformlyOn F (fun _ => c) p s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence to a constant function is equivalent to convergence in `p ×ˢ ⊤`. -/
theorem tendsto_prod_top_iff {c : β} :
Tendsto (↿F) (p ×ˢ ⊤) (𝓝 c) ↔ TendstoUniformly F (fun _ => c) p := by
rw [tendstoUniformly_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter]
exact tendsto_prod_filter_iff
/-- Uniform convergence on the empty set is vacuously true -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_empty : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p ∅ := fun u _ => by simp
/-- Uniform convergence on a singleton is equivalent to regular convergence -/
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_singleton_iff_tendsto :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f p {x} ↔ Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x)) := by
simp_rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right, tendsto_def]
exact forall₂_congr fun u _ => by simp [mem_prod_principal, preimage]
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(p' : Filter α) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p p' := by
simpa only [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff] using hg.comp (tendsto_fst (g := p'))
/-- If a sequence `g` converges to some `b`, then the sequence of constant functions
`fun n ↦ fun a ↦ g n` converges to the constant function `fun a ↦ b` on any set `s` -/
theorem Filter.Tendsto.tendstoUniformlyOn_const {g : ι → β} {b : β} (hg : Tendsto g p (𝓝 b))
(s : Set α) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n : ι => fun _ : α => g n) (fun _ : α => b) p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr (hg.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_const (𝓟 s))
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformlyOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
{V : Set β} {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ V)) (hU : x ∈ U) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F (F x) (𝓝[U] x) V := by
set φ := fun q : α × β => ((x, q.2), q)
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto]
change Tendsto (Prod.map (↿F) ↿F ∘ φ) (𝓝[U] x ×ˢ 𝓟 V) (𝓤 γ)
simp only [nhdsWithin, Filter.prod_eq_inf, comap_inf, inf_assoc, comap_principal, inf_principal]
refine hF.comp (Tendsto.inf ?_ <| tendsto_principal_principal.2 fun x hx => ⟨⟨hU, hx.2⟩, hx⟩)
simp only [uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod, tendsto_comap_iff, (· ∘ ·),
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap]
exact tendsto_comap.prodMk (tendsto_diag_uniformity _ _)
theorem UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {U : Set α}
(hU : U ∈ 𝓝 x) {F : α → β → γ} (hF : UniformContinuousOn (↿F) (U ×ˢ (univ : Set β))) :
TendstoUniformly F (F x) (𝓝 x) := by
simpa only [tendstoUniformlyOn_univ, nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 hU]
using hF.tendstoUniformlyOn (mem_of_mem_nhds hU)
theorem UniformContinuous₂.tendstoUniformly [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace γ] {f : α → β → γ}
(h : UniformContinuous₂ f) : TendstoUniformly f (f x) (𝓝 x) :=
UniformContinuousOn.tendstoUniformly univ_mem <| by rwa [univ_prod_univ, uniformContinuousOn_univ]
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (p' : Filter α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : (ι × ι) × α in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', (F m.fst.fst m.snd, F m.fst.snd m.snd) ∈ u
/-- A sequence is uniformly Cauchy if eventually all of its pairwise differences are
uniformly bounded -/
def UniformCauchySeqOn (F : ι → α → β) (p : Filter ι) (s : Set α) : Prop :=
∀ u ∈ 𝓤 β, ∀ᶠ m : ι × ι in p ×ˢ p, ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → (F m.fst x, F m.snd x) ∈ u
theorem uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s ↔ UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by
simp only [UniformCauchySeqOn, UniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
refine forall₂_congr fun u hu => ?_
rw [eventually_prod_principal_iff]
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p (𝓟 s) := by rwa [← uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter]
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter (hF : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') :
UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p' := by
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
have := tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((hF t ht).prod_mk (hF t ht))
apply this.diag_of_prod_right.mono
simp only [and_imp, Prod.forall]
intro n1 n2 x hl hr
exact Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (prodMk_mem_compRel (htsymm hl) hr) htmem
/-- A sequence that converges uniformly is also uniformly Cauchy -/
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.uniformCauchySeqOn (hF : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s :=
uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mpr
hF.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto
(hF : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hF' : ∀ᶠ x : α in p', Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) :
TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p' := by
rcases p.eq_or_neBot with rfl | _
· simp only [TendstoUniformlyOnFilter, bot_prod, eventually_bot, implies_true]
-- Proof idea: |f_n(x) - f(x)| ≤ |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| + |f_m(x) - f(x)|. We choose `n`
-- so that |f_n(x) - f_m(x)| is uniformly small across `s` whenever `m ≥ n`. Then for
-- a fixed `x`, we choose `m` sufficiently large such that |f_m(x) - f(x)| is small.
intro u hu
rcases comp_symm_of_uniformity hu with ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htmem⟩
-- We will choose n, x, and m simultaneously. n and x come from hF. m comes from hF'
-- But we need to promote hF' to the full product filter to use it
have hmc : ∀ᶠ x in (p ×ˢ p) ×ˢ p', Tendsto (fun n : ι => F n x.snd) p (𝓝 (f x.snd)) := by
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
exact ⟨fun _ => True, by simp, _, hF', by simp⟩
-- To apply filter operations we'll need to do some order manipulation
rw [Filter.eventually_swap_iff]
have := tendsto_prodAssoc.eventually (tendsto_prod_swap.eventually ((hF t ht).and hmc))
apply this.curry.mono
simp only [Equiv.prodAssoc_apply, eventually_and, eventually_const, Prod.snd_swap, Prod.fst_swap,
and_imp, Prod.forall]
-- Complete the proof
intro x n hx hm'
refine Set.mem_of_mem_of_subset (mem_compRel.mpr ?_) htmem
rw [Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right] at hm'
have := hx.and (hm' ht)
obtain ⟨m, hm⟩ := this.exists
exact ⟨F m x, ⟨hm.2, htsymm hm.1⟩⟩
/-- A uniformly Cauchy sequence converges uniformly to its limit -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.tendstoUniformlyOn_of_tendsto (hF : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(hF' : ∀ x : α, x ∈ s → Tendsto (fun n => F n x) p (𝓝 (f x))) : TendstoUniformlyOn F f p s :=
tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mpr
(hF.uniformCauchySeqOnFilter.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter_of_tendsto hF')
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_left {p'' : Filter ι} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p'' p' := by
intro u hu
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono (p'.prod_mono_left (Filter.prod_mono hp hp))
exact this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.mono_right {p'' : Filter α} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(hp : p'' ≤ p') : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p'' := fun u hu =>
have := (hf u hu).filter_mono ((p ×ˢ p).prod_mono_right hp)
this.mono (by simp)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.mono (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hss' : s' ⊆ s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn F p s' := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
exact hf.mono_right (le_principal_iff.mpr <| mem_principal.mpr hss')
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOnFilter.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter F p p')
(g : γ → α) : UniformCauchySeqOnFilter (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (p'.comap g) := fun u hu => by
obtain ⟨pa, hpa, pb, hpb, hpapb⟩ := eventually_prod_iff.mp (hf u hu)
rw [eventually_prod_iff]
refine ⟨pa, hpa, pb ∘ g, ?_, fun hx _ hy => hpapb hx hy⟩
exact eventually_comap.mpr (hpb.mono fun x hx y hy => by simp only [hx, hy, Function.comp_apply])
/-- Composing on the right by a function preserves uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.comp {γ : Type*} (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (g : γ → α) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => F n ∘ g) p (g ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [uniformCauchySeqOn_iff_uniformCauchySeqOnFilter] at hf ⊢
simpa only [UniformCauchySeqOn, comap_principal] using hf.comp g
/-- Composing on the left by a uniformly continuous function preserves
uniform Cauchy sequences -/
theorem UniformContinuous.comp_uniformCauchySeqOn [UniformSpace γ] {g : β → γ}
(hg : UniformContinuous g) (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun n => g ∘ F n) p s := fun _u hu => hf _ (hg hu)
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap {ι' α' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α' → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} {s' : Set α'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s)
(h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s') :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun i : ι × ι' => Prod.map (F i.1) (F' i.2)) (p ×ˢ p') (s ×ˢ s') := by
intro u hu
rw [uniformity_prod_eq_prod, mem_map, mem_prod_iff] at hu
obtain ⟨v, hv, w, hw, hvw⟩ := hu
simp_rw [mem_prod, and_imp, Prod.forall, Prod.map_apply]
rw [← Set.image_subset_iff] at hvw
apply (tendsto_swap4_prod.eventually ((h v hv).prod_mk (h' w hw))).mono
intro x hx a b ha hb
exact hvw ⟨_, mk_mem_prod (hx.1 a ha) (hx.2 b hb), rfl⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformCauchySeqOn.prod_map := UniformCauchySeqOn.prodMap
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod {ι' β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι' → α → β'}
{p' : Filter ι'} (h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p' s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι × ι') a => (F i.fst a, F' i.snd a)) (p ×ˢ p') s :=
(congr_arg _ s.inter_self).mp ((h.prodMap h').comp fun a => (a, a))
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.prod' {β' : Type*} [UniformSpace β'] {F' : ι → α → β'}
(h : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (h' : UniformCauchySeqOn F' p s) :
UniformCauchySeqOn (fun (i : ι) a => (F i a, F' i a)) p s := fun u hu =>
have hh : Tendsto (fun x : ι => (x, x)) p (p ×ˢ p) := tendsto_diag
(hh.prodMap hh).eventually ((h.prod h') u hu)
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchy_map [hp : NeBot p] (hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F p s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
Cauchy (map (fun i => F i x) p) := by
simp only [cauchy_map_iff, hp, true_and]
intro u hu
rw [mem_map]
filter_upwards [hf u hu] with p hp using hp x hx
/-- If a sequence of functions is uniformly Cauchy on a set, then the values at each point form
a Cauchy sequence. See `UniformCauchSeqOn.cauchy_map` for the non-`atTop` case. -/
theorem UniformCauchySeqOn.cauchySeq [Nonempty ι] [SemilatticeSup ι]
(hf : UniformCauchySeqOn F atTop s) (hx : x ∈ s) :
CauchySeq fun i ↦ F i x :=
hf.cauchy_map (hp := atTop_neBot) hx
section SeqTendsto
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated]
(h : ∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s) :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto, tendsto_iff_seq_tendsto]
intro u hu
rw [tendsto_prod_iff'] at hu
specialize h (fun n => (u n).fst) hu.1
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h
exact h.comp (tendsto_id.prodMk hu.2)
theorem TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} (h : TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s)
(u : ℕ → ι) (hu : Tendsto u atTop l) : TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s := by
rw [tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_tendsto] at h ⊢
exact h.comp ((hu.comp tendsto_fst).prodMk tendsto_snd)
theorem tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformlyOn F f l s ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformlyOn (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop s :=
⟨TendstoUniformlyOn.seq_tendstoUniformlyOn, tendstoUniformlyOn_of_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn⟩
theorem tendstoUniformly_iff_seq_tendstoUniformly {l : Filter ι} [l.IsCountablyGenerated] :
TendstoUniformly F f l ↔
∀ u : ℕ → ι, Tendsto u atTop l → TendstoUniformly (fun n => F (u n)) f atTop := by
simp_rw [← tendstoUniformlyOn_univ]
exact tendstoUniformlyOn_iff_seq_tendstoUniformlyOn
end SeqTendsto
section
variable [NeBot p] {L : ι → β} {ℓ : β}
theorem TendstoUniformlyOnFilter.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformlyOnFilter F f p p') (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) := by
rw [tendsto_nhds_left]
intro s hs
rw [mem_map, Set.preimage, ← eventually_iff]
obtain ⟨t, ht, hts⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hs
have p1 : ∀ᶠ i in p, (L i, ℓ) ∈ t := tendsto_nhds_left.mp h3 ht
have p2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (F i x, L i) ∈ t := by
filter_upwards [h2] with i h2 using tendsto_nhds_left.mp h2 ht
have p3 : ∀ᶠ i in p, ∀ᶠ x in p', (f x, F i x) ∈ t := (h1 t ht).curry
obtain ⟨i, p4, p5, p6⟩ := (p1.and (p2.and p3)).exists
filter_upwards [p5, p6] with x p5 p6 using hts ⟨F i x, p6, L i, p5, p4⟩
theorem TendstoUniformly.tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto
(h1 : TendstoUniformly F f p) (h2 : ∀ᶠ i in p, Tendsto (F i) p' (𝓝 (L i)))
(h3 : Tendsto L p (𝓝 ℓ)) : Tendsto f p' (𝓝 ℓ) :=
(h1.tendstoUniformlyOnFilter.mono_right le_top).tendsto_of_eventually_tendsto h2 h3
end
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/UniformConvergence.lean | 562 | 570 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2023 Mantas Bakšys, Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mantas Bakšys, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Monovary
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Rearrangement
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.Perm.Cycle.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Chebyshev's sum inequality
This file proves the Chebyshev sum inequality.
Chebyshev's inequality states `(∑ i ∈ s, f i) * (∑ i ∈ s, g i) ≤ #s * ∑ i ∈ s, f i * g i`
when `f g : ι → α` monovary, and the reverse inequality when `f` and `g` antivary.
## Main declarations
* `MonovaryOn.sum_mul_sum_le_card_mul_sum`: Chebyshev's inequality.
* `AntivaryOn.card_mul_sum_le_sum_mul_sum`: Chebyshev's inequality, dual version.
* `sq_sum_le_card_mul_sum_sq`: Special case of Chebyshev's inequality when `f = g`.
## Implementation notes
In fact, we don't need much compatibility between the addition and multiplication of `α`, so we can
actually decouple them by replacing multiplication with scalar multiplication and making `f` and `g`
land in different types.
As a bonus, this makes the dual statement trivial. The multiplication versions are provided for
convenience.
The case for `Monotone`/`Antitone` pairs of functions over a `LinearOrder` is not deduced in this
file because it is easily deducible from the `Monovary` API.
-/
open Equiv Equiv.Perm Finset Function OrderDual
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Scalar multiplication versions -/
section SMul
variable [Semiring α] [LinearOrder α] [IsStrictOrderedRing α] [ExistsAddOfLE α]
[AddCommMonoid β] [LinearOrder β] [IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid β]
[Module α β] [OrderedSMul α β] {s : Finset ι} {σ : Perm ι} {f : ι → α} {g : ι → β}
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` monovary together (eg they are both
monotone/antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem MonovaryOn.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum (hfg : MonovaryOn f g s) :
(∑ i ∈ s, f i) • ∑ i ∈ s, g i ≤ #s • ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i := by
classical
obtain ⟨σ, hσ, hs⟩ := s.countable_toSet.exists_cycleOn
rw [← card_range #s, sum_smul_sum_eq_sum_perm hσ]
exact sum_le_card_nsmul _ _ _ fun n _ ↦
hfg.sum_smul_comp_perm_le_sum_smul fun x hx ↦ hs fun h ↦ hx <| IsFixedPt.perm_pow h _
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` antivary together (eg one is monotone, the
other is antitone), the scalar product of their sum is less than the size of the set times their
scalar product. -/
theorem AntivaryOn.card_smul_sum_le_sum_smul_sum (hfg : AntivaryOn f g s) :
#s • ∑ i ∈ s, f i • g i ≤ (∑ i ∈ s, f i) • ∑ i ∈ s, g i :=
hfg.dual_right.sum_smul_sum_le_card_smul_sum
| variable [Fintype ι]
/-- **Chebyshev's Sum Inequality**: When `f` and `g` monovary together (eg they are both
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Chebyshev.lean | 70 | 72 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Julian Kuelshammer. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Julian Kuelshammer
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.Fin
import Mathlib.Algebra.BigOperators.NatAntidiagonal
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Central
import Mathlib.Tactic.FieldSimp
import Mathlib.Tactic.GCongr
import Mathlib.Tactic.Positivity
/-!
# Catalan numbers
The Catalan numbers (http://oeis.org/A000108) are probably the most ubiquitous sequence of integers
in mathematics. They enumerate several important objects like binary trees, Dyck paths, and
triangulations of convex polygons.
## Main definitions
* `catalan n`: the `n`th Catalan number, defined recursively as
`catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i)`.
## Main results
* `catalan_eq_centralBinom_div`: The explicit formula for the Catalan number using the central
binomial coefficient, `catalan n = Nat.centralBinom n / (n + 1)`.
* `treesOfNumNodesEq_card_eq_catalan`: The number of binary trees with `n` internal nodes
is `catalan n`
## Implementation details
The proof of `catalan_eq_centralBinom_div` follows https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3304415
## TODO
* Prove that the Catalan numbers enumerate many interesting objects.
* Provide the many variants of Catalan numbers, e.g. associated to complex reflection groups,
Fuss-Catalan, etc.
-/
open Finset
open Finset.antidiagonal (fst_le snd_le)
/-- The recursive definition of the sequence of Catalan numbers:
`catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i)` -/
def catalan : ℕ → ℕ
| 0 => 1
| n + 1 =>
∑ i : Fin n.succ,
catalan i * catalan (n - i)
@[simp]
theorem catalan_zero : catalan 0 = 1 := by rw [catalan]
theorem catalan_succ (n : ℕ) : catalan (n + 1) = ∑ i : Fin n.succ, catalan i * catalan (n - i) := by
rw [catalan]
theorem catalan_succ' (n : ℕ) :
catalan (n + 1) = ∑ ij ∈ antidiagonal n, catalan ij.1 * catalan ij.2 := by
rw [catalan_succ, Nat.sum_antidiagonal_eq_sum_range_succ (fun x y => catalan x * catalan y) n,
sum_range]
@[simp]
theorem catalan_one : catalan 1 = 1 := by simp [catalan_succ]
/-- A helper sequence that can be used to prove the equality of the recursive and the explicit
definition using a telescoping sum argument. -/
private def gosperCatalan (n j : ℕ) : ℚ :=
Nat.centralBinom j * Nat.centralBinom (n - j) * (2 * j - n) / (2 * n * (n + 1))
private theorem gosper_trick {n i : ℕ} (h : i ≤ n) :
gosperCatalan (n + 1) (i + 1) - gosperCatalan (n + 1) i =
Nat.centralBinom i / (i + 1) * Nat.centralBinom (n - i) / (n - i + 1) := by
have l₁ : (i : ℚ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have l₂ : (n : ℚ) - i + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have h₁ := (mul_div_cancel_left₀ (↑(Nat.centralBinom (i + 1))) l₁).symm
have h₂ := (mul_div_cancel_left₀ (↑(Nat.centralBinom (n - i + 1))) l₂).symm
have h₃ : ((i : ℚ) + 1) * (i + 1).centralBinom = 2 * (2 * i + 1) * i.centralBinom :=
mod_cast Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ i
have h₄ :
((n : ℚ) - i + 1) * (n - i + 1).centralBinom = 2 * (2 * (n - i) + 1) * (n - i).centralBinom :=
mod_cast Nat.succ_mul_centralBinom_succ (n - i)
simp only [gosperCatalan]
push_cast
rw [show n + 1 - i = n - i + 1 by rw [Nat.add_comm (n - i) 1, ← (Nat.add_sub_assoc h 1),
add_comm]]
rw [h₁, h₂, h₃, h₄]
field_simp
ring
private theorem gosper_catalan_sub_eq_central_binom_div (n : ℕ) : gosperCatalan (n + 1) (n + 1) -
gosperCatalan (n + 1) 0 = Nat.centralBinom (n + 1) / (n + 2) := by
have : (n : ℚ) + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have : (n : ℚ) + 1 + 1 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
have h : (n : ℚ) + 2 ≠ 0 := by norm_cast
simp only [gosperCatalan, Nat.sub_zero, Nat.centralBinom_zero, Nat.sub_self]
field_simp
ring
theorem catalan_eq_centralBinom_div (n : ℕ) : catalan n = n.centralBinom / (n + 1) := by
suffices (catalan n : ℚ) = Nat.centralBinom n / (n + 1) by
have h := Nat.succ_dvd_centralBinom n
exact mod_cast this
induction n using Nat.caseStrongRecOn with
| zero => simp
| ind d hd =>
simp_rw [catalan_succ, Nat.cast_sum, Nat.cast_mul]
trans (∑ i : Fin d.succ, Nat.centralBinom i / (i + 1) *
(Nat.centralBinom (d - i) / (d - i + 1)) : ℚ)
· congr
ext1 x
have m_le_d : x.val ≤ d := by omega
have d_minus_x_le_d : (d - x.val) ≤ d := tsub_le_self
rw [hd _ m_le_d, hd _ d_minus_x_le_d]
norm_cast
· trans (∑ i : Fin d.succ, (gosperCatalan (d + 1) (i + 1) - gosperCatalan (d + 1) i))
· refine sum_congr rfl fun i _ => ?_
rw [gosper_trick i.is_le, mul_div]
· rw [← sum_range fun i => gosperCatalan (d + 1) (i + 1) - gosperCatalan (d + 1) i,
sum_range_sub, Nat.succ_eq_add_one]
rw [gosper_catalan_sub_eq_central_binom_div d]
norm_cast
theorem succ_mul_catalan_eq_centralBinom (n : ℕ) : (n + 1) * catalan n = n.centralBinom :=
(Nat.eq_mul_of_div_eq_right n.succ_dvd_centralBinom (catalan_eq_centralBinom_div n).symm).symm
theorem catalan_two : catalan 2 = 2 := by
norm_num [catalan_eq_centralBinom_div, Nat.centralBinom, Nat.choose]
theorem catalan_three : catalan 3 = 5 := by
norm_num [catalan_eq_centralBinom_div, Nat.centralBinom, Nat.choose]
namespace Tree
/-- Given two finsets, find all trees that can be formed with
left child in `a` and right child in `b` -/
abbrev pairwiseNode (a b : Finset (Tree Unit)) : Finset (Tree Unit) :=
(a ×ˢ b).map ⟨fun x => x.1 △ x.2, fun ⟨x₁, x₂⟩ ⟨y₁, y₂⟩ => fun h => by simpa using h⟩
/-- A Finset of all trees with `n` nodes. See `mem_treesOfNodesEq` -/
def treesOfNumNodesEq : ℕ → Finset (Tree Unit)
| 0 => {nil}
| n + 1 =>
(antidiagonal n).attach.biUnion fun ijh =>
pairwiseNode (treesOfNumNodesEq ijh.1.1) (treesOfNumNodesEq ijh.1.2)
decreasing_by
· simp_wf; have := fst_le ijh.2; omega
· simp_wf; have := snd_le ijh.2; omega
@[simp]
theorem treesOfNumNodesEq_zero : treesOfNumNodesEq 0 = {nil} := by rw [treesOfNumNodesEq]
theorem treesOfNumNodesEq_succ (n : ℕ) :
treesOfNumNodesEq (n + 1) =
(antidiagonal n).biUnion fun ij =>
pairwiseNode (treesOfNumNodesEq ij.1) (treesOfNumNodesEq ij.2) := by
rw [treesOfNumNodesEq]
ext
simp
@[simp]
theorem mem_treesOfNumNodesEq {x : Tree Unit} {n : ℕ} :
x ∈ treesOfNumNodesEq n ↔ x.numNodes = n := by
induction x using Tree.unitRecOn generalizing n <;> cases n <;>
simp [treesOfNumNodesEq_succ, *]
theorem mem_treesOfNumNodesEq_numNodes (x : Tree Unit) : x ∈ treesOfNumNodesEq x.numNodes :=
mem_treesOfNumNodesEq.mpr rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_treesOfNumNodesEq (n : ℕ) :
| ↑(treesOfNumNodesEq n) = { x : Tree Unit | x.numNodes = n } :=
| Mathlib/Combinatorics/Enumerative/Catalan.lean | 178 | 178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Ashvni Narayanan. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Ashvni Narayanan, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.AlgebraMap
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Derivative
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Choose.Cast
import Mathlib.NumberTheory.Bernoulli
/-!
# Bernoulli polynomials
The [Bernoulli polynomials](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_polynomials)
are an important tool obtained from Bernoulli numbers.
## Mathematical overview
The $n$-th Bernoulli polynomial is defined as
$$ B_n(X) = ∑_{k = 0}^n {n \choose k} (-1)^k B_k X^{n - k} $$
where $B_k$ is the $k$-th Bernoulli number. The Bernoulli polynomials are generating functions,
$$ \frac{t e^{tX} }{ e^t - 1} = ∑_{n = 0}^{\infty} B_n(X) \frac{t^n}{n!} $$
## Implementation detail
Bernoulli polynomials are defined using `bernoulli`, the Bernoulli numbers.
## Main theorems
- `sum_bernoulli`: The sum of the $k^\mathrm{th}$ Bernoulli polynomial with binomial
coefficients up to `n` is `(n + 1) * X^n`.
- `Polynomial.bernoulli_generating_function`: The Bernoulli polynomials act as generating functions
for the exponential.
## TODO
- `bernoulli_eval_one_neg` : $$ B_n(1 - x) = (-1)^n B_n(x) $$
-/
noncomputable section
open Nat Polynomial
open Nat Finset
namespace Polynomial
/-- The Bernoulli polynomials are defined in terms of the negative Bernoulli numbers. -/
def bernoulli (n : ℕ) : ℚ[X] :=
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), Polynomial.monomial (n - i) (_root_.bernoulli i * choose n i)
theorem bernoulli_def (n : ℕ) : bernoulli n =
∑ i ∈ range (n + 1), Polynomial.monomial i (_root_.bernoulli (n - i) * choose n i) := by
rw [← sum_range_reflect, add_succ_sub_one, add_zero, bernoulli]
apply sum_congr rfl
rintro x hx
rw [mem_range_succ_iff] at hx
rw [choose_symm hx, tsub_tsub_cancel_of_le hx]
/-
### examples
-/
section Examples
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_zero : bernoulli 0 = 1 := by simp [bernoulli]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_eval_zero (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli n).eval 0 = _root_.bernoulli n := by
rw [bernoulli, eval_finset_sum, sum_range_succ]
have : ∑ x ∈ range n, _root_.bernoulli x * n.choose x * 0 ^ (n - x) = 0 := by
apply sum_eq_zero fun x hx => _
intros x hx
| simp [tsub_eq_zero_iff_le, mem_range.1 hx]
simp [this]
@[simp]
theorem bernoulli_eval_one (n : ℕ) : (bernoulli n).eval 1 = bernoulli' n := by
simp only [bernoulli, eval_finset_sum]
simp only [← succ_eq_add_one, sum_range_succ, mul_one, cast_one, choose_self,
| Mathlib/NumberTheory/BernoulliPolynomials.lean | 76 | 82 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers, Heather Macbeth
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.InnerProductSpace.TwoDim
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Unoriented.Basic
/-!
# Oriented angles.
This file defines oriented angles in real inner product spaces.
## Main definitions
* `Orientation.oangle` is the oriented angle between two vectors with respect to an orientation.
## Implementation notes
The definitions here use the `Real.angle` type, angles modulo `2 * π`. For some purposes,
angles modulo `π` are more convenient, because results are true for such angles with less
configuration dependence. Results that are only equalities modulo `π` can be represented
modulo `2 * π` as equalities of `(2 : ℤ) • θ`.
## References
* Evan Chen, Euclidean Geometry in Mathematical Olympiads.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
attribute [local instance] Complex.finrank_real_complex_fact
variable {V V' : Type*}
variable [NormedAddCommGroup V] [NormedAddCommGroup V']
variable [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V']
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Fact (finrank ℝ V' = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
local notation "ω" => o.areaForm
/-- The oriented angle from `x` to `y`, modulo `2 * π`. If either vector is 0, this is 0.
See `InnerProductGeometry.angle` for the corresponding unoriented angle definition. -/
def oangle (x y : V) : Real.Angle :=
Complex.arg (o.kahler x y)
/-- Oriented angles are continuous when the vectors involved are nonzero. -/
@[fun_prop]
theorem continuousAt_oangle {x : V × V} (hx1 : x.1 ≠ 0) (hx2 : x.2 ≠ 0) :
ContinuousAt (fun y : V × V => o.oangle y.1 y.2) x := by
refine (Complex.continuousAt_arg_coe_angle ?_).comp ?_
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx1 hx2
exact ((continuous_ofReal.comp continuous_inner).add
((continuous_ofReal.comp o.areaForm'.continuous₂).mul continuous_const)).continuousAt
/-- If the first vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_left (x : V) : o.oangle 0 x = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the second vector passed to `oangle` is 0, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_zero_right (x : V) : o.oangle x 0 = 0 := by simp [oangle]
/-- If the two vectors passed to `oangle` are the same, the result is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_self (x : V) : o.oangle x x = 0 := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_self, ← ofReal_pow]
convert QuotientAddGroup.mk_zero (AddSubgroup.zmultiples (2 * π))
apply arg_ofReal_of_nonneg
positivity
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y ≠ 0) : x ≠ y := by
rintro rfl; simp at h
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = π) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) :
y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the angle between two vectors is `-π / 2`, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_eq_neg_pi_div_two {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = (-π / 2 : ℝ)) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ Real.Angle.neg_pi_div_two_ne_zero : o.oangle x y ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is nonzero, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_ne_zero (Real.Angle.sign_ne_zero_iff.1 h).1
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is positive, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the first vector is nonzero. -/
theorem left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ 0 :=
o.left_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the second vector is nonzero. -/
theorem right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : y ≠ 0 :=
o.right_ne_zero_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- If the sign of the angle between two vectors is negative, the vectors are not equal. -/
theorem ne_of_oangle_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) : x ≠ y :=
o.ne_of_oangle_sign_ne_zero (h.symm ▸ by decide : (o.oangle x y).sign ≠ 0)
/-- Swapping the two vectors passed to `oangle` negates the angle. -/
theorem oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle y x = -o.oangle x y := by
simp only [oangle, o.kahler_swap y x, Complex.arg_conj_coe_angle]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev (x y : V) : o.oangle x y + o.oangle y x = 0 := by
simp [o.oangle_rev y x]
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` adds `π` to the angle. -/
theorem oangle_neg_right {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) = o.oangle x y + π := by
simp only [oangle, map_neg]
convert Complex.arg_neg_coe_angle _
exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- Negating the first vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_left (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy]
/-- Negating the second vector passed to `oangle` does not change twice the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_right (x y : V) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx]
· by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy]
· simp [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy]
/-- Negating both vectors passed to `oangle` does not change the angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_neg (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) (-y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle]
/-- Negating the first vector produces the same angle as negating the second vector. -/
theorem oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg y, oangle_neg_neg, neg_neg]
/-- The angle between the negation of a nonzero vector and that vector is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_left {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle (-x) x = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_left, hx]
/-- The angle between a nonzero vector and its negation is `π`. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_neg_self_right {x : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) : o.oangle x (-x) = π := by
simp [oangle_neg_right, hx]
/-- Twice the angle between the negation of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_left (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (-x) x = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and its negation is 0. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_neg_self_right (x : V) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (-x) = 0 := by
by_cases hx : x = 0 <;> simp [hx]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the first vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_left (x y : V) : o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, oangle_rev, neg_add_cancel]
/-- Adding the angles between two vectors in each order, with the second vector in each angle
negated, results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_oangle_rev_neg_right (x y : V) : o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-x) = 0 := by
rw [o.oangle_rev (-x), oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, add_neg_cancel]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a positive real does not change the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_pos (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 < r) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x y := by simp [oangle, Complex.arg_real_mul _ hr]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle (r • x) y = o.oangle (-x) y := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_left_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a negative real produces the same angle
as negating that vector. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_of_neg (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r < 0) :
o.oangle x (r • y) = o.oangle x (-y) := by
rw [← neg_neg r, neg_smul, ← smul_neg, o.oangle_smul_right_of_pos _ _ (neg_pos_of_neg hr)]
/-- The angle between a nonnegative multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_left_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between a vector and a nonnegative multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_right_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : 0 ≤ r) : o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- The angle between two nonnegative multiples of the same vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_smul_smul_self_of_nonneg (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} (hr₁ : 0 ≤ r₁) (hr₂ : 0 ≤ r₂) :
o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by
rcases hr₁.lt_or_eq with (h | h)
· simp [h, hr₂]
· simp [h.symm]
/-- Multiplying the first vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Multiplying the second vector passed to `oangle` by a nonzero real does not change twice the
angle. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero (x y : V) {r : ℝ} (hr : r ≠ 0) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • y) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y := by
rcases hr.lt_or_lt with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a multiple of a vector and that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r • x) x = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between a vector and a multiple of that vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_self (x : V) {r : ℝ} : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x (r • x) = 0 := by
rcases lt_or_le r 0 with (h | h) <;> simp [h]
/-- Twice the angle between two multiples of a vector is 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_smul_smul_self (x : V) {r₁ r₂ : ℝ} :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (r₁ • x) (r₂ • x) = 0 := by by_cases h : r₁ = 0 <;> simp [h]
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the left are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq {x y : V} (z : V) (h : (ℝ ∙ x) = ℝ ∙ y) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle y z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_left_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two vectors are equal, twice angles with those vectors on the right are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq (x : V) {y z : V} (h : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [Submodule.span_singleton_eq_span_singleton] at h
rcases h with ⟨r, rfl⟩
exact (o.two_zsmul_oangle_smul_right_of_ne_zero _ _ (Units.ne_zero _)).symm
/-- If the spans of two pairs of vectors are equal, twice angles between those vectors are
equal. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_of_span_eq_of_span_eq {w x y z : V} (hwx : (ℝ ∙ w) = ℝ ∙ x)
(hyz : (ℝ ∙ y) = ℝ ∙ z) : (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle w y = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle x z := by
rw [o.two_zsmul_oangle_left_of_span_eq y hwx, o.two_zsmul_oangle_right_of_span_eq x hyz]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_oangle_rev_eq_zero {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ o.oangle y x = 0 := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_zero]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero if and only if they are on the same ray. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ SameRay ℝ x y := by
rw [oangle, kahler_apply_apply, Complex.arg_coe_angle_eq_iff_eq_toReal, Real.Angle.toReal_zero,
Complex.arg_eq_zero_iff]
simpa using o.nonneg_inner_and_areaForm_eq_zero_iff_sameRay x y
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the angle with the vectors
swapped is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_oangle_rev_eq_pi {x y : V} : o.oangle x y = π ↔ o.oangle y x = π := by
rw [oangle_rev, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, Real.Angle.neg_coe_pi]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only they are nonzero and the first is
on the same ray as the negation of the second. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = π ↔ x ≠ 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 ∧ SameRay ℝ x (-y) := by
rw [← o.oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· intro h
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm] at h
refine ⟨hx, hy, ?_⟩
rw [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, h, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi]
· rintro ⟨hx, hy, h⟩
rwa [o.oangle_neg_right hx hy, ← Real.Angle.sub_coe_pi_eq_add_coe_pi, sub_eq_zero] at h
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors are
not linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ ¬LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg,
sameRay_or_ne_zero_and_sameRay_neg_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is zero or `π` if and only if the first vector is zero
or the second is a multiple of the first. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_right_eq_smul {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y = 0 ∨ o.oangle x y = π ↔ x = 0 ∨ ∃ r : ℝ, y = r • x := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay, oangle_eq_pi_iff_sameRay_neg]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· rcases h with (h | ⟨-, -, h⟩)
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, rfl⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
exact Or.inr ⟨r, rfl⟩
· by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
obtain ⟨r, -, hy⟩ := h.exists_nonneg_left hx
refine Or.inr ⟨-r, ?_⟩
simp [hy]
· rcases h with (rfl | ⟨r, rfl⟩); · simp
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
rcases lt_trichotomy r 0 with (hr | hr | hr)
· rw [← neg_smul]
exact Or.inr ⟨hx, smul_ne_zero hr.ne hx,
SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x (Left.neg_pos_iff.2 hr)⟩
· simp [hr]
· exact Or.inl (SameRay.sameRay_pos_smul_right x hr)
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is not zero or `π` if and only if those two vectors
are linearly independent. -/
theorem oangle_ne_zero_and_ne_pi_iff_linearIndependent {x y : V} :
o.oangle x y ≠ 0 ∧ o.oangle x y ≠ π ↔ LinearIndependent ℝ ![x, y] := by
rw [← not_or, ← not_iff_not, Classical.not_not,
oangle_eq_zero_or_eq_pi_iff_not_linearIndependent]
/-- Two vectors are equal if and only if they have equal norms and zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero (x y : V) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ ∧ o.oangle x y = 0 := by
rw [oangle_eq_zero_iff_sameRay]
constructor
· rintro rfl
simp; rfl
· rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy)
· simp
rintro ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
obtain ⟨r, hr, rfl⟩ := h₂.exists_nonneg_right hy
have : ‖y‖ ≠ 0 := by simpa using hy
obtain rfl : r = 1 := by
apply mul_right_cancel₀ this
simpa [norm_smul, abs_of_nonneg hr] using h₁
simp
/-- Two vectors with equal norms are equal if and only if they have zero angle between them. -/
theorem eq_iff_oangle_eq_zero_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) : x = y ↔ o.oangle x y = 0 :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).2, fun ha =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨h, ha⟩⟩
/-- Two vectors with zero angle between them are equal if and only if they have equal norms. -/
theorem eq_iff_norm_eq_of_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V} (h : o.oangle x y = 0) : x = y ↔ ‖x‖ = ‖y‖ :=
⟨fun he => ((o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).1 he).1, fun hn =>
(o.eq_iff_norm_eq_and_oangle_eq_zero x y).2 ⟨hn, h⟩⟩
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the second plus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z := by
simp_rw [oangle]
rw [← Complex.arg_mul_coe_angle, o.kahler_mul y x z]
· congr 1
exact mod_cast Complex.arg_real_mul _ (by positivity : 0 < ‖y‖ ^ 2)
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hy hz
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the second and the third plus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the first and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_swap {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle y z + o.oangle x y = o.oangle x z := by rw [add_comm, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the first and the second equals the angle between the second and the third. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y = o.oangle y z := by
rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add_swap hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, the angle between the first and the third minus the angle
between the second and the third equals the angle between the first and the second. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_sub_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x z - o.oangle y z = o.oangle x y := by rw [sub_eq_iff_eq_add, o.oangle_add hx hy hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order results in 0. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3 {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x = 0 := by simp [hx, hy, hz]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the first
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle (-x) y + o.oangle (-y) z + o.oangle (-z) x = π := by
rw [o.oangle_neg_left hx hy, o.oangle_neg_left hy hz, o.oangle_neg_left hz hx,
show o.oangle x y + π + (o.oangle y z + π) + (o.oangle z x + π) =
o.oangle x y + o.oangle y z + o.oangle z x + (π + π + π : Real.Angle) by abel,
o.oangle_add_cyc3 hx hy hz, Real.Angle.coe_pi_add_coe_pi, zero_add, zero_add]
/-- Given three nonzero vectors, adding the angles between them in cyclic order, with the second
vector in each angle negated, results in π. If the vectors add to 0, this is a version of the
sum of the angles of a triangle. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right {x y z : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (hz : z ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x (-y) + o.oangle y (-z) + o.oangle z (-x) = π := by
simp_rw [← oangle_neg_left_eq_neg_right, o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_left hx hy hz]
/-- Pons asinorum, oriented vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle x (x - y) = o.oangle (y - x) y := by simp [oangle, h]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
vector angle form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y : V} (hn : x ≠ y) (h : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) :
o.oangle y x = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) y := by
rw [two_zsmul]
nth_rw 1 [← o.oangle_sub_eq_oangle_sub_rev_of_norm_eq h]
rw [eq_sub_iff_add_eq, ← oangle_neg_neg, ← add_assoc]
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at h
exact hn h
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (h.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
convert o.oangle_add_cyc3_neg_right (neg_ne_zero.2 hy) hx (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hn.symm) using 1
simp
/-- The angle between two vectors, with respect to an orientation given by `Orientation.map`
with a linear isometric equivalence, equals the angle between those two vectors, transformed by
the inverse of that equivalence, with respect to the original orientation. -/
@[simp]
theorem oangle_map (x y : V') (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] V') :
(Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o).oangle x y = o.oangle (f.symm x) (f.symm y) := by
simp [oangle, o.kahler_map]
@[simp]
protected theorem _root_.Complex.oangle (w z : ℂ) :
Complex.orientation.oangle w z = Complex.arg (conj w * z) := by
simp [oangle, mul_comm z]
/-- The oriented angle on an oriented real inner product space of dimension 2 can be evaluated in
terms of a complex-number representation of the space. -/
theorem oangle_map_complex (f : V ≃ₗᵢ[ℝ] ℂ)
(hf : Orientation.map (Fin 2) f.toLinearEquiv o = Complex.orientation) (x y : V) :
o.oangle x y = Complex.arg (conj (f x) * f y) := by
rw [← Complex.oangle, ← hf, o.oangle_map]
iterate 2 rw [LinearIsometryEquiv.symm_apply_apply]
/-- Negating the orientation negates the value of `oangle`. -/
theorem oangle_neg_orientation_eq_neg (x y : V) : (-o).oangle x y = -o.oangle x y := by
simp [oangle]
/-- The inner product of two vectors is the product of the norms and the cosine of the oriented
angle between the vectors. -/
theorem inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle (x y : V) :
⟪x, y⟫ = ‖x‖ * ‖y‖ * Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [oangle, Real.Angle.cos_coe, Complex.cos_arg, o.norm_kahler]
· simp only [kahler_apply_apply, real_smul, add_re, ofReal_re, mul_re, I_re, ofReal_im]
field_simp
· exact o.kahler_ne_zero hx hy
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the inner product divided by
the product of the norms. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = ⟪x, y⟫ / (‖x‖ * ‖y‖) := by
rw [o.inner_eq_norm_mul_norm_mul_cos_oangle]
field_simp [norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx, norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy]
/-- The cosine of the oriented angle between two nonzero vectors equals that of the unoriented
angle. -/
theorem cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
Real.Angle.cos (o.oangle x y) = Real.cos (InnerProductGeometry.angle x y) := by
rw [o.cos_oangle_eq_inner_div_norm_mul_norm hx hy, InnerProductGeometry.cos_angle]
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is plus or minus the unoriented angle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y ∨
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y :=
Real.Angle.cos_eq_real_cos_iff_eq_or_eq_neg.1 <| o.cos_oangle_eq_cos_angle hx hy
/-- The unoriented angle between two nonzero vectors is the absolute value of the oriented angle,
converted to a real. -/
theorem angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = |(o.oangle x y).toReal| := by
have h0 := InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg x y
have hpi := InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi x y
rcases o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy with (h | h)
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
· rw [h, eq_comm, Real.Angle.abs_toReal_neg_coe_eq_self_iff]
exact ⟨h0, hpi⟩
/-- If the sign of the oriented angle between two vectors is zero, either one of the vectors is
zero or the unoriented angle is 0 or π. -/
theorem eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero {x y : V}
(h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 0) :
x = 0 ∨ y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 ∨ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · simp [hx]
by_cases hy : y = 0; · simp [hy]
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
rw [Real.Angle.sign_eq_zero_iff] at h
rcases h with (h | h) <;> simp [h, Real.pi_pos.le]
/-- If two unoriented angles are equal, and the signs of the corresponding oriented angles are
equal, then the oriented angles are equal (even in degenerate cases). -/
theorem oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V}
(h : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z)
(hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) : o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
by_cases h0 : (w = 0 ∨ x = 0) ∨ y = 0 ∨ z = 0
· have hs' : (o.oangle w x).sign = 0 ∧ (o.oangle y z).sign = 0 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs.symm
· simpa using hs
· simpa using hs
rcases hs' with ⟨hswx, hsyz⟩
have h' : InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = π / 2 ∧ InnerProductGeometry.angle y z = π / 2 := by
rcases h0 with ((rfl | rfl) | rfl | rfl)
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h.symm
· simpa using h
· simpa using h
rcases h' with ⟨hwx, hyz⟩
have hpi : π / 2 ≠ π := by
intro hpi
rw [div_eq_iff, eq_comm, ← sub_eq_zero, mul_two, add_sub_cancel_right] at hpi
· exact Real.pi_pos.ne.symm hpi
· exact two_ne_zero
have h0wx : w = 0 ∨ x = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hswx
simpa [hwx, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
have h0yz : y = 0 ∨ z = 0 := by
have h0' := o.eq_zero_or_angle_eq_zero_or_pi_of_sign_oangle_eq_zero hsyz
simpa [hyz, Real.pi_pos.ne.symm, hpi] using h0'
rcases h0wx with (h0wx | h0wx) <;> rcases h0yz with (h0yz | h0yz) <;> simp [h0wx, h0yz]
· push_neg at h0
rw [Real.Angle.eq_iff_abs_toReal_eq_of_sign_eq hs]
rwa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.1.1 h0.1.2,
o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal h0.2.1 h0.2.2] at h
/-- If the signs of two oriented angles between nonzero vectors are equal, the oriented angles are
equal if and only if the unoriented angles are equal. -/
theorem angle_eq_iff_oangle_eq_of_sign_eq {w x y z : V} (hw : w ≠ 0) (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0)
(hz : z ≠ 0) (hs : (o.oangle w x).sign = (o.oangle y z).sign) :
InnerProductGeometry.angle w x = InnerProductGeometry.angle y z ↔
o.oangle w x = o.oangle y z := by
refine ⟨fun h => o.oangle_eq_of_angle_eq_of_sign_eq h hs, fun h => ?_⟩
rw [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hw hx, o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hy hz, h]
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals the unoriented angle if the sign is positive. -/
theorem oangle_eq_angle_of_sign_eq_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = 1) :
o.oangle x y = InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_right ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, Real.Angle.sign_neg, neg_eq_iff_eq_neg, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors equals minus the unoriented angle if the sign is
negative. -/
theorem oangle_eq_neg_angle_of_sign_eq_neg_one {x y : V} (h : (o.oangle x y).sign = -1) :
o.oangle x y = -InnerProductGeometry.angle x y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0; · exfalso; simp [hx] at h
by_cases hy : y = 0; · exfalso; simp [hy] at h
refine (o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy).resolve_left ?_
intro hxy
rw [hxy, ← SignType.neg_iff, ← not_le] at h
exact h (Real.Angle.sign_coe_nonneg_of_nonneg_of_le_pi (InnerProductGeometry.angle_nonneg _ _)
(InnerProductGeometry.angle_le_pi _ _))
/-- The oriented angle between two nonzero vectors is zero if and only if the unoriented angle
is zero. -/
theorem oangle_eq_zero_iff_angle_eq_zero {x y : V} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) :
o.oangle x y = 0 ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
· simpa [o.angle_eq_abs_oangle_toReal hx hy]
· have ha := o.oangle_eq_angle_or_eq_neg_angle hx hy
rw [h] at ha
simpa using ha
/-- The oriented angle between two vectors is `π` if and only if the unoriented angle is `π`. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_iff_angle_eq_pi {x y : V} :
| o.oangle x y = π ↔ InnerProductGeometry.angle x y = π := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· simp [hx, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
by_cases hy : y = 0
· simp [hy, Real.Angle.pi_ne_zero.symm, div_eq_mul_inv, mul_right_eq_self₀, not_or,
Real.pi_ne_zero]
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => ?_⟩
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Oriented/Basic.lean | 671 | 678 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.Constructions
/-!
# Neighborhoods and continuity relative to a subset
This file develops API on the relative versions
* `nhdsWithin` of `nhds`
* `ContinuousOn` of `Continuous`
* `ContinuousWithinAt` of `ContinuousAt`
related to continuity, which are defined in previous definition files.
Their basic properties studied in this file include the relationships between
these restricted notions and the corresponding notions for the subtype
equipped with the subspace topology.
## Notation
* `𝓝 x`: the filter of neighborhoods of a point `x`;
* `𝓟 s`: the principal filter of a set `s`;
* `𝓝[s] x`: the filter `nhdsWithin x s` of neighborhoods of a point `x` within a set `s`.
-/
open Set Filter Function Topology Filter
variable {α β γ δ : Type*}
variable [TopologicalSpace α]
/-!
## Properties of the neighborhood-within filter
-/
@[simp]
theorem nhds_bind_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ((𝓝 a).bind fun x => 𝓝[s] x) = 𝓝[s] a :=
bind_inf_principal.trans <| congr_arg₂ _ nhds_bind_nhds rfl
@[simp]
theorem eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x :=
Filter.ext_iff.1 nhds_bind_nhdsWithin { x | p x }
theorem eventually_nhdsWithin_iff {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝 a, x ∈ s → p x :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem frequently_nhdsWithin_iff {z : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] z, p x) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝 z, p x ∧ x ∈ s :=
frequently_inf_principal.trans <| by simp only [and_comm]
theorem mem_closure_ne_iff_frequently_within {z : α} {s : Set α} :
z ∈ closure (s \ {z}) ↔ ∃ᶠ x in 𝓝[≠] z, x ∈ s := by
simp [mem_closure_iff_frequently, frequently_nhdsWithin_iff]
@[simp]
theorem eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} {p : α → Prop} :
(∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] a, ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] y, p x) ↔ ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, p x := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, fun h => (eventually_nhds_nhdsWithin.2 h).filter_mono inf_le_left⟩
simp only [eventually_nhdsWithin_iff] at h ⊢
exact h.mono fun x hx hxs => (hx hxs).self_of_nhds hxs
@[simp]
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin_iff {x : α} {s t : Set α} :
(∀ᶠ x' in 𝓝[s] x, t ∈ 𝓝[s] x') ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
eventually_eventually_nhdsWithin
theorem nhdsWithin_eq (a : α) (s : Set α) :
𝓝[s] a = ⨅ t ∈ { t : Set α | a ∈ t ∧ IsOpen t }, 𝓟 (t ∩ s) :=
((nhds_basis_opens a).inf_principal s).eq_biInf
@[simp] lemma nhdsWithin_univ (a : α) : 𝓝[Set.univ] a = 𝓝 a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_univ, inf_top_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_hasBasis {ι : Sort*} {p : ι → Prop} {s : ι → Set α} {a : α}
(h : (𝓝 a).HasBasis p s) (t : Set α) : (𝓝[t] a).HasBasis p fun i => s i ∩ t :=
h.inf_principal t
theorem nhdsWithin_basis_open (a : α) (t : Set α) :
(𝓝[t] a).HasBasis (fun u => a ∈ u ∧ IsOpen u) fun u => u ∩ t :=
nhdsWithin_hasBasis (nhds_basis_opens a) t
theorem mem_nhdsWithin {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u, IsOpen u ∧ a ∈ u ∧ u ∩ s ⊆ t := by
simpa only [and_assoc, and_left_comm] using (nhdsWithin_basis_open a s).mem_iff
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter {t : Set α} {a : α} {s : Set α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] a ↔ ∃ u ∈ 𝓝 a, u ∩ s ⊆ t :=
(nhdsWithin_hasBasis (𝓝 a).basis_sets s).mem_iff
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_compl {x : α} {s : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 x) (t : Set α) :
s \ t ∈ 𝓝[tᶜ] x :=
diff_mem_inf_principal_compl hs t
theorem diff_mem_nhdsWithin_diff {x : α} {s t : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝[t] x) (t' : Set α) :
s \ t' ∈ 𝓝[t \ t'] x := by
rw [nhdsWithin, diff_eq, diff_eq, ← inf_principal, ← inf_assoc]
exact inter_mem_inf hs (mem_principal_self _)
theorem nhds_of_nhdsWithin_of_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h1 : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h2 : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
t ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rcases mem_nhdsWithin_iff_exists_mem_nhds_inter.mp h2 with ⟨_, Hw, hw⟩
exact (𝓝 a).sets_of_superset ((𝓝 a).inter_sets Hw h1) hw
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝 x, y ∈ s → y ∈ t :=
eventually_inf_principal
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} :
t ∈ 𝓝[s] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] (s ∩ t : Set α) := by
simp_rw [mem_nhdsWithin_iff_eventually, eventuallyEq_set, mem_inter_iff, iff_self_and]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_iff_eventuallyEq {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x = 𝓝[t] x ↔ s =ᶠ[𝓝 x] t :=
set_eventuallyEq_iff_inf_principal.symm
theorem nhdsWithin_le_iff {s t : Set α} {x : α} : 𝓝[s] x ≤ 𝓝[t] x ↔ t ∈ 𝓝[s] x :=
set_eventuallyLE_iff_inf_principal_le.symm.trans set_eventuallyLE_iff_mem_inf_principal
theorem preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝[t] a := by
lift a to t using h
replace hs : (fun x : t => π x) ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := preimage_nhds_coinduced hs
rwa [← map_nhds_subtype_val, mem_map]
theorem mem_nhdsWithin_of_mem_nhds {s t : Set α} {a : α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a :=
mem_inf_of_left h
theorem self_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : s ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
mem_inf_of_right (mem_principal_self s)
theorem eventually_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} : ∀ᶠ x in 𝓝[s] a, x ∈ s :=
self_mem_nhdsWithin
theorem inter_mem_nhdsWithin (s : Set α) {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : s ∩ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a :=
inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin (mem_inf_of_left h)
theorem pure_le_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) : pure a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
le_inf (pure_le_nhds a) (le_principal_iff.2 ha)
theorem mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t : Set α} (ha : a ∈ s) (ht : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : a ∈ t :=
pure_le_nhdsWithin ha ht
theorem Filter.Eventually.self_of_nhdsWithin {p : α → Prop} {s : Set α} {x : α}
(h : ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[s] x, p y) (hx : x ∈ s) : p x :=
mem_of_mem_nhdsWithin hx h
theorem tendsto_const_nhdsWithin {l : Filter β} {s : Set α} {a : α} (ha : a ∈ s) :
Tendsto (fun _ : β => a) l (𝓝[s] a) :=
tendsto_const_pure.mono_right <| pure_le_nhdsWithin ha
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict'' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left (le_principal_iff.mpr (inter_mem self_mem_nhdsWithin h)))
(inf_le_inf_left _ (principal_mono.mpr Set.inter_subset_left))
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict' {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝 a) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict'' s <| mem_inf_of_left h
theorem nhdsWithin_restrict {a : α} (s : Set α) {t : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ t) (h₁ : IsOpen t) :
𝓝[s] a = 𝓝[s ∩ t] a :=
nhdsWithin_restrict' s (IsOpen.mem_nhds h₁ h₀)
theorem nhdsWithin_le_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[t] a ≤ 𝓝[s] a :=
nhdsWithin_le_iff.mpr h
theorem nhdsWithin_le_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a ≤ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ]
apply nhdsWithin_le_of_mem
exact univ_mem
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin' {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (hs : s ∈ 𝓝 a) (h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) :
𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by rw [nhdsWithin_restrict' t hs, nhdsWithin_restrict' u hs, h₂]
theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhdsWithin {a : α} {s t u : Set α} (h₀ : a ∈ s) (h₁ : IsOpen s)
(h₂ : t ∩ s = u ∩ s) : 𝓝[t] a = 𝓝[u] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_restrict t h₀ h₁, nhdsWithin_restrict u h₀ h₁, h₂]
@[simp] theorem nhdsWithin_eq_nhds {a : α} {s : Set α} : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a ↔ s ∈ 𝓝 a :=
inf_eq_left.trans le_principal_iff
theorem IsOpen.nhdsWithin_eq {a : α} {s : Set α} (h : IsOpen s) (ha : a ∈ s) : 𝓝[s] a = 𝓝 a :=
nhdsWithin_eq_nhds.2 <| h.mem_nhds ha
theorem preimage_nhds_within_coinduced {π : α → β} {s : Set β} {t : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ t)
(ht : IsOpen t)
(hs : s ∈ @nhds β (.coinduced (fun x : t => π x) inferInstance) (π a)) :
π ⁻¹' s ∈ 𝓝 a := by
rw [← ht.nhdsWithin_eq h]
exact preimage_nhdsWithin_coinduced' h hs
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_empty (a : α) : 𝓝[∅] a = ⊥ := by rw [nhdsWithin, principal_empty, inf_bot_eq]
theorem nhdsWithin_union (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∪ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊔ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_sup_left, sup_principal]
theorem nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin (b : α) {I₁ I₂ : Set α} (hI : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂) :
nhds b = nhdsWithin b I₁ ⊔ nhdsWithin b I₂ := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, hI, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- If `L` and `R` are neighborhoods of `b` within sets whose union is `Set.univ`, then
`L ∪ R` is a neighborhood of `b`. -/
theorem union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin {b : α}
{I₁ I₂ : Set α} (h : Set.univ = I₁ ∪ I₂)
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ nhdsWithin b I₁)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ nhdsWithin b I₂) : L ∪ R ∈ nhds b := by
rw [← nhdsWithin_univ b, h, nhdsWithin_union]
exact ⟨mem_of_superset hL (by simp), mem_of_superset hR (by simp)⟩
/-- Writing a punctured neighborhood filter as a sup of left and right filters. -/
lemma punctured_nhds_eq_nhdsWithin_sup_nhdsWithin [LinearOrder α] {x : α} :
𝓝[≠] x = 𝓝[<] x ⊔ 𝓝[>] x := by
rw [← Iio_union_Ioi, nhdsWithin_union]
/-- Obtain a "predictably-sided" neighborhood of `b` from two one-sided neighborhoods. -/
theorem nhds_of_Ici_Iic [LinearOrder α] {b : α}
{L : Set α} (hL : L ∈ 𝓝[≤] b)
{R : Set α} (hR : R ∈ 𝓝[≥] b) : L ∩ Iic b ∪ R ∩ Ici b ∈ 𝓝 b :=
union_mem_nhds_of_mem_nhdsWithin Iic_union_Ici.symm
(inter_mem hL self_mem_nhdsWithin) (inter_mem hR self_mem_nhdsWithin)
theorem nhdsWithin_biUnion {ι} {I : Set ι} (hI : I.Finite) (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i ∈ I, s i] a = ⨆ i ∈ I, 𝓝[s i] a := by
induction I, hI using Set.Finite.induction_on with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hT => simp only [hT, nhdsWithin_union, iSup_insert, biUnion_insert]
theorem nhdsWithin_sUnion {S : Set (Set α)} (hS : S.Finite) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃₀ S] a = ⨆ s ∈ S, 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [sUnion_eq_biUnion, nhdsWithin_biUnion hS]
theorem nhdsWithin_iUnion {ι} [Finite ι] (s : ι → Set α) (a : α) :
𝓝[⋃ i, s i] a = ⨆ i, 𝓝[s i] a := by
rw [← sUnion_range, nhdsWithin_sUnion (finite_range s), iSup_range]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓝[t] a := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [inf_left_comm, inf_assoc, inf_principal, ← inf_assoc, inf_idem]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter' (a : α) (s t : Set α) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a ⊓ 𝓟 t := by
delta nhdsWithin
rw [← inf_principal, inf_assoc]
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ∈ 𝓝[t] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[t] a := by
rw [nhdsWithin_inter, inf_eq_right]
exact nhdsWithin_le_of_mem h
theorem nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem' {a : α} {s t : Set α} (h : t ∈ 𝓝[s] a) : 𝓝[s ∩ t] a = 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [inter_comm, nhdsWithin_inter_of_mem h]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_singleton (a : α) : 𝓝[{a}] a = pure a := by
rw [nhdsWithin, principal_singleton, inf_eq_right.2 (pure_le_nhds a)]
@[simp]
theorem nhdsWithin_insert (a : α) (s : Set α) : 𝓝[insert a s] a = pure a ⊔ 𝓝[s] a := by
rw [← singleton_union, nhdsWithin_union, nhdsWithin_singleton]
| theorem mem_nhdsWithin_insert {a : α} {s t : Set α} : t ∈ 𝓝[insert a s] a ↔ a ∈ t ∧ t ∈ 𝓝[s] a := by
simp
| Mathlib/Topology/ContinuousOn.lean | 267 | 268 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.Tactic.NormNum.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.TryThis
import Mathlib.Util.AtomM
/-!
# The `abel` tactic
Evaluate expressions in the language of additive, commutative monoids and groups.
-/
-- TODO: assert_not_exists NonUnitalNonAssociativeSemiring
assert_not_exists OrderedAddCommMonoid TopologicalSpace PseudoMetricSpace
namespace Mathlib.Tactic.Abel
open Lean Elab Meta Tactic Qq
initialize registerTraceClass `abel
initialize registerTraceClass `abel.detail
/--
Tactic for evaluating equations in the language of
*additive*, commutative monoids and groups.
`abel` and its variants work as both tactics and conv tactics.
* `abel1` fails if the target is not an equality that is provable by the axioms of
commutative monoids/groups.
* `abel_nf` rewrites all group expressions into a normal form.
* In tactic mode, `abel_nf at h` can be used to rewrite in a hypothesis.
* `abel_nf (config := cfg)` allows for additional configuration:
* `red`: the reducibility setting (overridden by `!`)
* `zetaDelta`: if true, local let variables can be unfolded (overridden by `!`)
* `recursive`: if true, `abel_nf` will also recurse into atoms
* `abel!`, `abel1!`, `abel_nf!` will use a more aggressive reducibility setting to identify atoms.
For example:
```
example [AddCommMonoid α] (a b : α) : a + (b + a) = a + a + b := by abel
example [AddCommGroup α] (a : α) : (3 : ℤ) • a = a + (2 : ℤ) • a := by abel
```
## Future work
* In mathlib 3, `abel` accepted additional optional arguments:
```
syntax "abel" (&" raw" <|> &" term")? (location)? : tactic
```
It is undecided whether these features should be restored eventually.
-/
syntax (name := abel) "abel" "!"? : tactic
/-- The `Context` for a call to `abel`.
Stores a few options for this call, and caches some common subexpressions
such as typeclass instances and `0 : α`.
-/
structure Context where
/-- The type of the ambient additive commutative group or monoid. -/
α : Expr
/-- The universe level for `α`. -/
univ : Level
/-- The expression representing `0 : α`. -/
α0 : Expr
/-- Specify whether we are in an additive commutative group or an additive commutative monoid. -/
isGroup : Bool
/-- The `AddCommGroup α` or `AddCommMonoid α` expression. -/
inst : Expr
/-- Populate a `context` object for evaluating `e`. -/
def mkContext (e : Expr) : MetaM Context := do
let α ← inferType e
let c ← synthInstance (← mkAppM ``AddCommMonoid #[α])
let cg ← synthInstance? (← mkAppM ``AddCommGroup #[α])
let u ← mkFreshLevelMVar
_ ← isDefEq (.sort (.succ u)) (← inferType α)
let α0 ← Expr.ofNat α 0
match cg with
| some cg => return ⟨α, u, α0, true, cg⟩
| _ => return ⟨α, u, α0, false, c⟩
/-- The monad for `Abel` contains, in addition to the `AtomM` state,
some information about the current type we are working over, so that we can consistently
use group lemmas or monoid lemmas as appropriate. -/
abbrev M := ReaderT Context AtomM
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst : AddWhatever α], _` to the
implicit parameters in the context, and the given list of arguments. -/
def Context.app (c : Context) (n : Name) (inst : Expr) : Array Expr → Expr :=
mkAppN (((@Expr.const n [c.univ]).app c.α).app inst)
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [inst α], _` to the implicit parameters in the
context, and the given list of arguments.
Compared to `context.app`, this takes the name of the typeclass, rather than an
inferred typeclass instance.
-/
def Context.mkApp (c : Context) (n inst : Name) (l : Array Expr) : MetaM Expr := do
return c.app n (← synthInstance ((Expr.const inst [c.univ]).app c.α)) l
/-- Add the letter "g" to the end of the name, e.g. turning `term` into `termg`.
This is used to choose between declarations taking `AddCommMonoid` and those
taking `AddCommGroup` instances.
-/
def addG : Name → Name
| .str p s => .str p (s ++ "g")
| n => n
/-- Apply the function `n : ∀ {α} [AddComm{Monoid,Group} α]` to the given list of arguments.
Will use the `AddComm{Monoid,Group}` instance that has been cached in the context.
-/
def iapp (n : Name) (xs : Array Expr) : M Expr := do
let c ← read
return c.app (if c.isGroup then addG n else n) c.inst xs
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative monoid. -/
def term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n : ℕ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- A type synonym used by `abel` to represent `n • x + a` in an additive commutative group. -/
def termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n : ℤ) (x a : α) : α := n • x + a
/-- Evaluate a term with coefficient `n`, atom `x` and successor terms `a`. -/
def mkTerm (n x a : Expr) : M Expr := iapp ``term #[n, x, a]
/-- Interpret an integer as a coefficient to a term. -/
def intToExpr (n : ℤ) : M Expr := do
Expr.ofInt (mkConst (if (← read).isGroup then ``Int else ``Nat) []) n
/-- A normal form for `abel`.
Expressions are represented as a list of terms of the form `e = n • x`,
where `n : ℤ` and `x` is an arbitrary element of the additive commutative monoid or group.
We explicitly track the `Expr` forms of `e` and `n`, even though they could be reconstructed,
for efficiency. -/
inductive NormalExpr : Type
| zero (e : Expr) : NormalExpr
| nterm (e : Expr) (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : NormalExpr
deriving Inhabited
/-- Extract the expression from a normal form. -/
def NormalExpr.e : NormalExpr → Expr
| .zero e => e
| .nterm e .. => e
instance : Coe NormalExpr Expr where coe := NormalExpr.e
/-- Construct the normal form representing a single term. -/
def NormalExpr.term' (n : Expr × ℤ) (x : ℕ × Expr) (a : NormalExpr) : M NormalExpr :=
return .nterm (← mkTerm n.1 x.2 a) n x a
/-- Construct the normal form representing zero. -/
def NormalExpr.zero' : M NormalExpr := return NormalExpr.zero (← read).α0
open NormalExpr
theorem const_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @term α _ n x a = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem const_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (k n x a a') (h : k + a = a') :
k + @termg α _ n x a = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_comm, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_const {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@term α _ n x a + k = term n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, term, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_constg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a k a') (h : a + k = a') :
@termg α _ n x a + k = termg n x a' := by
simp [h.symm, termg, add_assoc]
theorem term_add_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a') (h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n')
(h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') : @term α _ n₁ x a₁ + @term α _ n₂ x a₂ = term n' x a' := by
simp [h₁.symm, h₂.symm, term, add_nsmul, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
theorem term_add_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n₁ x a₁ n₂ a₂ n' a')
(h₁ : n₁ + n₂ = n') (h₂ : a₁ + a₂ = a') :
@termg α _ n₁ x a₁ + @termg α _ n₂ x a₂ = termg n' x a' := by
simp only [termg, h₁.symm, add_zsmul, h₂.symm]
exact add_add_add_comm (n₁ • x) a₁ (n₂ • x) a₂
theorem zero_term {α} [AddCommMonoid α] (x a) : @term α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [term, zero_nsmul, one_nsmul]
theorem zero_termg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (x a) : @termg α _ 0 x a = a := by
simp [termg, zero_zsmul]
/--
Interpret the sum of two expressions in `abel`'s normal form.
-/
partial def evalAdd : NormalExpr → NormalExpr → M (NormalExpr × Expr)
| zero _, e₂ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``zero_add #[e₂]
return (e₂, p)
| e₁, zero _ => do
let p ← mkAppM ``add_zero #[e₁]
return (e₁, p)
| he₁@(nterm e₁ n₁ x₁ a₁), he₂@(nterm e₂ n₂ x₂ a₂) => do
if x₁.1 = x₂.1 then
let n' ← Mathlib.Meta.NormNum.eval (← mkAppM ``HAdd.hAdd #[n₁.1, n₂.1])
let (a', h₂) ← evalAdd a₁ a₂
let k := n₁.2 + n₂.2
let p₁ ← iapp ``term_add_term
#[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, n₂.1, a₂, n'.expr, a', ← n'.getProof, h₂]
if k = 0 then do
let p ← mkEqTrans p₁ (← iapp ``zero_term #[x₁.2, a'])
return (a', p)
else return (← term' (n'.expr, k) x₁ a', p₁)
else if x₁.1 < x₂.1 then do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd a₁ he₂
return (← term' n₁ x₁ a', ← iapp ``term_add_const #[n₁.1, x₁.2, a₁, e₂, a', h])
else do
let (a', h) ← evalAdd he₁ a₂
return (← term' n₂ x₂ a', ← iapp ``const_add_term #[e₁, n₂.1, x₂.2, a₂, a', h])
|
theorem term_neg {α} [AddCommGroup α] (n x a n' a')
(h₁ : -n = n') (h₂ : -a = a') : -@termg α _ n x a = termg n' x a' := by
simpa [h₂.symm, h₁.symm, termg] using add_comm _ _
| Mathlib/Tactic/Abel.lean | 221 | 224 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2019 Floris van Doorn. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Floris van Doorn, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel, Chris Hughes
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Fin.Rev
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Find
/-!
# Operation on tuples
We interpret maps `∀ i : Fin n, α i` as `n`-tuples of elements of possibly varying type `α i`,
`(α 0, …, α (n-1))`. A particular case is `Fin n → α` of elements with all the same type.
In this case when `α i` is a constant map, then tuples are isomorphic (but not definitionally equal)
to `Vector`s.
## Main declarations
There are three (main) ways to consider `Fin n` as a subtype of `Fin (n + 1)`, hence three (main)
ways to move between tuples of length `n` and of length `n + 1` by adding/removing an entry.
### Adding at the start
* `Fin.succ`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function for
all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `0` and for `i.succ` for all `i : Fin n`.
This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.cons`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.cons a f : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the start. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ` and `a : α 0`. This is a special case of
`Fin.cases`.
* `Fin.tail`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.tail f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.tail f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ`.
### Adding at the end
* `Fin.castSucc`: Send `i : Fin n` to `i : Fin (n + 1)`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.lastCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a function
for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `last n` and for `i.castSucc` for all
`i : Fin n`. This is defined in Core.
* `Fin.snoc`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` at the end. In general, tuples can be dependent
functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc` and `a : α (last n)`. This is a
special case of `Fin.lastCases`.
* `Fin.init`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.init f : Fin n → α` by forgetting
the start. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.init f : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc`.
### Adding in the middle
For a **pivot** `p : Fin (n + 1)`,
* `Fin.succAbove`: Send `i : Fin n` to
* `i : Fin (n + 1)` if `i < p`,
* `i + 1 : Fin (n + 1)` if `p ≤ i`.
* `Fin.succAboveCases`: Induction/recursion principle for `Fin`: To prove a property/define a
function for all `Fin (n + 1)`, it is enough to prove/define it for `p` and for `p.succAbove i`
for all `i : Fin n`.
* `Fin.insertNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin n → α` and an entry `a : α` into a tuple
`Fin.insertNth f a : Fin (n + 1) → α` by adding `a` in position `p`. In general, tuples can be
dependent functions, in which case `f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (p.succAbove i)` and `a : α p`. This is a
special case of `Fin.succAboveCases`.
* `Fin.removeNth`: Turn a tuple `f : Fin (n + 1) → α` into a tuple `Fin.removeNth p f : Fin n → α`
by forgetting the `p`-th value. In general, tuples can be dependent functions,
in which case `Fin.removeNth f : ∀ i : Fin n, α (succAbove p i)`.
`p = 0` means we add at the start. `p = last n` means we add at the end.
### Miscellaneous
* `Fin.find p` : returns the first index `n` where `p n` is satisfied, and `none` if it is never
satisfied.
* `Fin.append a b` : append two tuples.
* `Fin.repeat n a` : repeat a tuple `n` times.
-/
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe u v
namespace Fin
variable {m n : ℕ}
open Function
section Tuple
/-- There is exactly one tuple of size zero. -/
example (α : Fin 0 → Sort u) : Unique (∀ i : Fin 0, α i) := by infer_instance
theorem tuple0_le {α : Fin 0 → Type*} [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] (f g : ∀ i, α i) : f ≤ g :=
finZeroElim
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort u} (x : α 0) (q : ∀ i, α i) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) (i : Fin n)
(y : α i.succ) (z : α 0)
/-- The tail of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its last `n` entries. -/
def tail (q : ∀ i, α i) : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ := fun i ↦ q i.succ
theorem tail_def {n : ℕ} {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(tail fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.succ :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. -/
def cons (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : ∀ i, α i := fun j ↦ Fin.cases x p j
@[simp]
theorem tail_cons : tail (cons x p) = p := by
simp +unfoldPartialApp [tail, cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_succ : cons x p i.succ = p i := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_zero : cons x p 0 = x := by simp [cons]
@[simp]
theorem cons_one {α : Fin (n + 2) → Sort*} (x : α 0) (p : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i.succ) :
cons x p 1 = p 0 := by
rw [← cons_succ x p]; rfl
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_update : cons x (update p i y) = update (cons x p) i.succ y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp [Ne.symm (succ_ne_zero i)]
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j' = i
· rw [h']
simp
· have : j'.succ ≠ i.succ := by rwa [Ne, succ_inj]
rw [update_of_ne h', update_of_ne this, cons_succ]
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.cons` is injective. -/
theorem cons_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@cons n α) := fun x₀ y₀ x y h ↦
⟨congr_fun h 0, funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (Fin.succ i)⟩
@[simp]
theorem cons_inj {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x = cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ = y₀ ∧ x = y :=
cons_injective2.eq_iff
theorem cons_left_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : Function.Injective fun x₀ ↦ cons x₀ x :=
cons_injective2.left _
theorem cons_right_injective (x₀ : α 0) : Function.Injective (cons x₀) :=
cons_injective2.right _
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_cons_zero : update (cons x p) 0 z = cons z p := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· simp only [h, update_of_ne, Ne, not_false_iff]
let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, cons_succ]
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem cons_self_tail : cons (q 0) (tail q) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
simp
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this]
unfold tail
rw [cons_succ]
/-- Equivalence between tuples of length `n + 1` and pairs of an element and a tuple of length `n`
given by separating out the first element of the tuple.
This is `Fin.cons` as an `Equiv`. -/
@[simps]
def consEquiv (α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*) : α 0 × (∀ i, α (succ i)) ≃ ∀ i, α i where
toFun f := cons f.1 f.2
invFun f := (f 0, tail f)
left_inv f := by simp
right_inv f := by simp
/-- Recurse on an `n+1`-tuple by splitting it into a single element and an `n`-tuple. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consCases {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x : ∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) : P x :=
_root_.cast (by rw [cons_self_tail]) <| h (x 0) (tail x)
@[simp]
theorem consCases_cons {P : (∀ i : Fin n.succ, α i) → Sort v} (h : ∀ x₀ x, P (Fin.cons x₀ x))
(x₀ : α 0) (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ) : @consCases _ _ _ h (cons x₀ x) = h x₀ x := by
rw [consCases, cast_eq]
congr
/-- Recurse on a tuple by splitting into `Fin.elim0` and `Fin.cons`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def consInduction {α : Sort*} {P : ∀ {n : ℕ}, (Fin n → α) → Sort v} (h0 : P Fin.elim0)
(h : ∀ {n} (x₀) (x : Fin n → α), P x → P (Fin.cons x₀ x)) : ∀ {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α), P x
| 0, x => by convert h0
| _ + 1, x => consCases (fun _ _ ↦ h _ _ <| consInduction h0 h _) x
theorem cons_injective_of_injective {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} (hx₀ : x₀ ∉ Set.range x)
(hx : Function.Injective x) : Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) := by
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro
rfl
· intro j h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h.symm⟩
· intro i
refine Fin.cases ?_ ?_
· intro h
rw [cons_zero, cons_succ] at h
exact hx₀.elim ⟨_, h⟩
· intro j h
rw [cons_succ, cons_succ] at h
exact congr_arg _ (hx h)
theorem cons_injective_iff {α} {x₀ : α} {x : Fin n → α} :
Function.Injective (cons x₀ x : Fin n.succ → α) ↔ x₀ ∉ Set.range x ∧ Function.Injective x := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ⟨?_, ?_⟩, fun h ↦ cons_injective_of_injective h.1 h.2⟩
· rintro ⟨i, hi⟩
replace h := @h i.succ 0
simp [hi] at h
· simpa [Function.comp] using h.comp (Fin.succ_injective _)
@[simp]
theorem forall_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∀ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun h ↦ h _, fun h x ↦ Subsingleton.elim finZeroElim x ▸ h⟩
@[simp]
theorem exists_fin_zero_pi {α : Fin 0 → Sort*} {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} :
(∃ x, P x) ↔ P finZeroElim :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ Subsingleton.elim x finZeroElim ▸ h, fun h ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
theorem forall_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∀ x, P x) ↔ ∀ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun h a v ↦ h (Fin.cons a v), consCases⟩
theorem exists_fin_succ_pi {P : (∀ i, α i) → Prop} : (∃ x, P x) ↔ ∃ a v, P (Fin.cons a v) :=
⟨fun ⟨x, h⟩ ↦ ⟨x 0, tail x, (cons_self_tail x).symm ▸ h⟩, fun ⟨_, _, h⟩ ↦ ⟨_, h⟩⟩
/-- Updating the first element of a tuple does not change the tail. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_zero : tail (update q 0 z) = tail q := by
ext j
simp [tail]
/-- Updating a nonzero element and taking the tail commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem tail_update_succ : tail (update q i.succ y) = update (tail q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [tail]
· simp [tail, (Fin.succ_injective n).ne h, h]
theorem comp_cons {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (y : α) (q : Fin n → α) :
g ∘ cons y q = cons (g y) (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = 0
· rw [h]
rfl
· let j' := pred j h
have : j'.succ = j := succ_pred j h
rw [← this, cons_succ, comp_apply, comp_apply, cons_succ]
theorem comp_tail {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n.succ → α) :
g ∘ tail q = tail (g ∘ q) := by
ext j
simp [tail]
section Preorder
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Type*}
theorem le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
q ≤ cons x p ↔ q 0 ≤ x ∧ tail q ≤ p :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr Iff.rfl <| forall_congr' fun j ↦ by simp [tail]
theorem cons_le [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x : α 0} {q : ∀ i, α i} {p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x p ≤ q ↔ x ≤ q 0 ∧ p ≤ tail q :=
@le_cons _ (fun i ↦ (α i)ᵒᵈ) _ x q p
theorem cons_le_cons [∀ i, Preorder (α i)] {x₀ y₀ : α 0} {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.succ} :
cons x₀ x ≤ cons y₀ y ↔ x₀ ≤ y₀ ∧ x ≤ y :=
forall_fin_succ.trans <| and_congr_right' <| by simp only [cons_succ, Pi.le_def]
end Preorder
theorem range_fin_succ {α} (f : Fin (n + 1) → α) :
Set.range f = insert (f 0) (Set.range (Fin.tail f)) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ exists_fin_succ.trans <| eq_comm.or Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem range_cons {α} {n : ℕ} (x : α) (b : Fin n → α) :
Set.range (Fin.cons x b : Fin n.succ → α) = insert x (Set.range b) := by
rw [range_fin_succ, cons_zero, tail_cons]
section Append
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Append a tuple of length `m` to a tuple of length `n` to get a tuple of length `m + n`.
This is a non-dependent version of `Fin.add_cases`. -/
def append (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) : Fin (m + n) → α :=
@Fin.addCases _ _ (fun _ => α) a b
@[simp]
theorem append_left (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin m) :
append u v (Fin.castAdd n i) = u i :=
addCases_left _
@[simp]
theorem append_right (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (i : Fin n) :
append u v (natAdd m i) = v i :=
addCases_right _
theorem append_right_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hv : n = 0) :
append u v = u ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hv, Nat.add_zero]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· rw [append_left, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg u (Fin.ext ?_)
simp
· exact (Fin.cast hv r).elim0
@[simp]
theorem append_elim0 (u : Fin m → α) :
append u Fin.elim0 = u ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_zero _) :=
append_right_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_left_nil (u : Fin m → α) (v : Fin n → α) (hu : m = 0) :
append u v = v ∘ Fin.cast (by rw [hu, Nat.zero_add]) := by
refine funext (Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_)
· exact (Fin.cast hu l).elim0
· rw [append_right, Function.comp_apply]
refine congr_arg v (Fin.ext ?_)
simp [hu]
@[simp]
theorem elim0_append (v : Fin n → α) :
append Fin.elim0 v = v ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_add _) :=
append_left_nil _ _ rfl
theorem append_assoc {p : ℕ} (a : Fin m → α) (b : Fin n → α) (c : Fin p → α) :
append (append a b) c = append a (append b c) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_assoc ..) := by
ext i
rw [Function.comp_apply]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) (fun r => ?_) i
· rw [append_left]
refine Fin.addCases (fun ll => ?_) (fun lr => ?_) l
· rw [append_left]
simp [castAdd_castAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [castAdd_natAdd]
· rw [append_right]
simp [← natAdd_natAdd]
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the left is the same as `Fin.cons`. -/
theorem append_left_eq_cons {n : ℕ} (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) (x : Fin n → α) :
Fin.append x₀ x = Fin.cons (x₀ 0) x ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
ext i
refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_left, Function.comp_apply, eq_comm]
exact Fin.cons_zero _ _
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_right, Function.comp_apply, Fin.cast_natAdd, eq_comm, Fin.addNat_one]
exact Fin.cons_succ _ _ _
/-- `Fin.cons` is the same as appending a one-tuple to the left. -/
theorem cons_eq_append (x : α) (xs : Fin n → α) :
cons x xs = append (cons x Fin.elim0) xs ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) := by
funext i; simp [append_left_eq_cons]
@[simp] lemma append_cast_left {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (n' : ℕ)
(h : n' = n) :
Fin.append (xs ∘ Fin.cast h) ys = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
@[simp] lemma append_cast_right {n m} (xs : Fin n → α) (ys : Fin m → α) (m' : ℕ)
(h : m' = m) :
Fin.append xs (ys ∘ Fin.cast h) = Fin.append xs ys ∘ (Fin.cast <| by rw [h]) := by
subst h; simp
lemma append_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m + n)) :
append xs ys (rev i) = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) (i.cast (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
rcases rev_surjective i with ⟨i, rfl⟩
rw [rev_rev]
induction i using Fin.addCases
· simp [rev_castAdd]
· simp [cast_rev, rev_addNat]
lemma append_comp_rev {m n} (xs : Fin m → α) (ys : Fin n → α) :
append xs ys ∘ rev = append (ys ∘ rev) (xs ∘ rev) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_comm ..) :=
funext <| append_rev xs ys
theorem append_castAdd_natAdd {f : Fin (m + n) → α} :
append (fun i ↦ f (castAdd n i)) (fun i ↦ f (natAdd m i)) = f := by
unfold append addCases
simp
end Append
section Repeat
variable {α : Sort*}
/-- Repeat `a` `m` times. For example `Fin.repeat 2 ![0, 3, 7] = ![0, 3, 7, 0, 3, 7]`. -/
def «repeat» (m : ℕ) (a : Fin n → α) : Fin (m * n) → α
| i => a i.modNat
@[simp]
theorem repeat_apply (a : Fin n → α) (i : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a i = a i.modNat :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem repeat_zero (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat 0 a = Fin.elim0 ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.zero_mul _) :=
funext fun x => (x.cast (Nat.zero_mul _)).elim0
@[simp]
theorem repeat_one (a : Fin n → α) : Fin.repeat 1 a = a ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.one_mul _) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
intro i
simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt i.is_lt]
theorem repeat_succ (a : Fin n → α) (m : ℕ) :
Fin.repeat m.succ a =
append a (Fin.repeat m a) ∘ Fin.cast ((Nat.succ_mul _ _).trans (Nat.add_comm ..)) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat]
@[simp]
theorem repeat_add (a : Fin n → α) (m₁ m₂ : ℕ) : Fin.repeat (m₁ + m₂) a =
append (Fin.repeat m₁ a) (Fin.repeat m₂ a) ∘ Fin.cast (Nat.add_mul ..) := by
generalize_proofs h
apply funext
rw [(Fin.rightInverse_cast h.symm).surjective.forall]
refine Fin.addCases (fun l => ?_) fun r => ?_
· simp [modNat, Nat.mod_eq_of_lt l.is_lt]
· simp [modNat, Nat.add_mod]
theorem repeat_rev (a : Fin n → α) (k : Fin (m * n)) :
Fin.repeat m a k.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) k :=
congr_arg a k.modNat_rev
theorem repeat_comp_rev (a : Fin n → α) :
Fin.repeat m a ∘ Fin.rev = Fin.repeat m (a ∘ Fin.rev) :=
funext <| repeat_rev a
end Repeat
end Tuple
section TupleRight
/-! In the previous section, we have discussed inserting or removing elements on the left of a
tuple. In this section, we do the same on the right. A difference is that `Fin (n+1)` is constructed
inductively from `Fin n` starting from the left, not from the right. This implies that Lean needs
more help to realize that elements belong to the right types, i.e., we need to insert casts at
several places. -/
variable {α : Fin (n + 1) → Sort*} (x : α (last n)) (q : ∀ i, α i)
(p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (i : Fin n) (y : α i.castSucc) (z : α (last n))
/-- The beginning of an `n+1` tuple, i.e., its first `n` entries -/
def init (q : ∀ i, α i) (i : Fin n) : α i.castSucc :=
q i.castSucc
theorem init_def {q : ∀ i, α i} :
(init fun k : Fin (n + 1) ↦ q k) = fun k : Fin n ↦ q k.castSucc :=
rfl
/-- Adding an element at the end of an `n`-tuple, to get an `n+1`-tuple. The name `snoc` comes from
`cons` (i.e., adding an element to the left of a tuple) read in reverse order. -/
def snoc (p : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) (x : α (last n)) (i : Fin (n + 1)) : α i :=
if h : i.val < n then _root_.cast (by rw [Fin.castSucc_castLT i h]) (p (castLT i h))
else _root_.cast (by rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]) x
@[simp]
theorem init_snoc : init (snoc p x) = p := by
ext i
simp only [init, snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_castSucc : snoc p x i.castSucc = p i := by
simp only [snoc, coe_castSucc, is_lt, cast_eq, dite_true]
convert cast_eq rfl (p i)
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_castSucc {α : Sort*} {a : α} {f : Fin n → α} :
(snoc f a : Fin (n + 1) → α) ∘ castSucc = f :=
funext fun i ↦ by rw [Function.comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_last : snoc p x (last n) = x := by simp [snoc]
lemma snoc_zero {α : Sort*} (p : Fin 0 → α) (x : α) :
Fin.snoc p x = fun _ ↦ x := by
ext y
have : Subsingleton (Fin (0 + 1)) := Fin.subsingleton_one
simp only [Subsingleton.elim y (Fin.last 0), snoc_last]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_nat_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (m + n) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ (natAdd m : Fin (n + 1) → Fin (m + n + 1)) =
snoc (f ∘ natAdd m) a := by
ext i
refine Fin.lastCases ?_ (fun i ↦ ?_) i
· simp only [Function.comp_apply]
rw [snoc_last, natAdd_last, snoc_last]
· simp only [comp_apply, snoc_castSucc]
rw [natAdd_castSucc, snoc_castSucc]
@[simp]
theorem snoc_cast_add {α : Fin (n + m + 1) → Sort*} (f : ∀ i : Fin (n + m), α i.castSucc)
(a : α (last (n + m))) (i : Fin n) : (snoc f a) (castAdd (m + 1) i) = f (castAdd m i) :=
dif_pos _
@[simp]
theorem snoc_comp_cast_add {n m : ℕ} {α : Sort*} (f : Fin (n + m) → α) (a : α) :
(snoc f a : Fin _ → α) ∘ castAdd (m + 1) = f ∘ castAdd m :=
funext (snoc_cast_add _ _)
/-- Updating a tuple and adding an element at the end commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_update : snoc (update p i y) x = update (snoc p x) i.castSucc y := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases with
| cast j => rcases eq_or_ne j i with rfl | hne <;> simp [*]
| last => simp [Ne.symm]
/-- Adding an element at the beginning of a tuple and then updating it amounts to adding it
directly. -/
theorem update_snoc_last : update (snoc p x) (last n) z = snoc p z := by
ext j
cases j using lastCases <;> simp
/-- As a binary function, `Fin.snoc` is injective. -/
theorem snoc_injective2 : Function.Injective2 (@snoc n α) := fun x y xₙ yₙ h ↦
⟨funext fun i ↦ by simpa using congr_fun h (castSucc i), by simpa using congr_fun h (last n)⟩
@[simp]
theorem snoc_inj {x y : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc} {xₙ yₙ : α (last n)} :
snoc x xₙ = snoc y yₙ ↔ x = y ∧ xₙ = yₙ :=
snoc_injective2.eq_iff
theorem snoc_right_injective (x : ∀ i : Fin n, α i.castSucc) :
Function.Injective (snoc x) :=
snoc_injective2.right _
theorem snoc_left_injective (xₙ : α (last n)) : Function.Injective (snoc · xₙ) :=
snoc_injective2.left _
/-- Concatenating the first element of a tuple with its tail gives back the original tuple -/
@[simp]
theorem snoc_init_self : snoc (init q) (q (last n)) = q := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp only [init, snoc, h, cast_eq, dite_true, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Updating the last element of a tuple does not change the beginning. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_last : init (update q (last n) z) = init q := by
ext j
simp [init, Fin.ne_of_lt]
/-- Updating an element and taking the beginning commute. -/
@[simp]
theorem init_update_castSucc : init (update q i.castSucc y) = update (init q) i y := by
ext j
by_cases h : j = i
· rw [h]
simp [init]
· simp [init, h, castSucc_inj]
/-- `tail` and `init` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem tail_init_eq_init_tail {β : Sort*} (q : Fin (n + 2) → β) :
tail (init q) = init (tail q) := by
ext i
simp [tail, init, castSucc_fin_succ]
/-- `cons` and `snoc` commute. We state this lemma in a non-dependent setting, as otherwise it
would involve a cast to convince Lean that the two types are equal, making it harder to use. -/
theorem cons_snoc_eq_snoc_cons {β : Sort*} (a : β) (q : Fin n → β) (b : β) :
@cons n.succ (fun _ ↦ β) a (snoc q b) = snoc (cons a q) b := by
ext i
by_cases h : i = 0
· simp [h, snoc, castLT]
set j := pred i h with ji
have : i = j.succ := by rw [ji, succ_pred]
rw [this, cons_succ]
by_cases h' : j.val < n
· set k := castLT j h' with jk
have : j = castSucc k := by rw [jk, castSucc_castLT]
rw [this, ← castSucc_fin_succ, snoc]
simp [pred, snoc, cons]
rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h', succ_last]
simp
theorem comp_snoc {α : Sort*} {β : Sort*} (g : α → β) (q : Fin n → α) (y : α) :
g ∘ snoc q y = snoc (g ∘ q) (g y) := by
ext j
by_cases h : j.val < n
· simp [h, snoc, castSucc_castLT]
· rw [eq_last_of_not_lt h]
simp
/-- Appending a one-tuple to the right is the same as `Fin.snoc`. -/
theorem append_right_eq_snoc {α : Sort*} {n : ℕ} (x : Fin n → α) (x₀ : Fin 1 → α) :
Fin.append x x₀ = Fin.snoc x (x₀ 0) := by
ext i
| refine Fin.addCases ?_ ?_ i <;> clear i
· intro i
rw [Fin.append_left]
exact (@snoc_castSucc _ (fun _ => α) _ _ i).symm
· intro i
rw [Subsingleton.elim i 0, Fin.append_right]
| Mathlib/Data/Fin/Tuple/Basic.lean | 635 | 640 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Lattice
import Mathlib.Order.ConditionallyCompleteLattice.Defs
/-!
# Theory of conditionally complete lattices
A conditionally complete lattice is a lattice in which every non-empty bounded subset `s`
has a least upper bound and a greatest lower bound, denoted below by `sSup s` and `sInf s`.
Typical examples are `ℝ`, `ℕ`, and `ℤ` with their usual orders.
The theory is very comparable to the theory of complete lattices, except that suitable
boundedness and nonemptiness assumptions have to be added to most statements.
We express these using the `BddAbove` and `BddBelow` predicates, which we use to prove
most useful properties of `sSup` and `sInf` in conditionally complete lattices.
To differentiate the statements between complete lattices and conditionally complete
lattices, we prefix `sInf` and `sSup` in the statements by `c`, giving `csInf` and `csSup`.
For instance, `sInf_le` is a statement in complete lattices ensuring `sInf s ≤ x`,
while `csInf_le` is the same statement in conditionally complete lattices
with an additional assumption that `s` is bounded below.
-/
-- Guard against import creep
assert_not_exists Multiset
open Function OrderDual Set
variable {α β γ : Type*} {ι : Sort*}
section
/-!
Extension of `sSup` and `sInf` from a preorder `α` to `WithTop α` and `WithBot α`
-/
variable [Preorder α]
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instSupSet [SupSet α] :
SupSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S =>
if ⊤ ∈ S then ⊤ else if BddAbove ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α) then
↑(sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ (a : WithTop α)) ⁻¹' S : Set α)) else ⊤⟩
open Classical in
noncomputable instance WithTop.instInfSet [InfSet α] : InfSet (WithTop α) :=
⟨fun S => if S ⊆ {⊤} ∨ ¬BddBelow S then ⊤ else ↑(sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) ⁻¹' S : Set α))⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instSupSet [SupSet α] : SupSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instInfSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sInf⟩
noncomputable instance WithBot.instInfSet [InfSet α] :
InfSet (WithBot α) :=
⟨(WithTop.instSupSet (α := αᵒᵈ)).sSup⟩
theorem WithTop.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ⊤ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddAbove ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithTop.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithTop α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊤}) (h's : BddBelow s) :
sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
if_neg <| by simp [hs, h's]
theorem WithBot.sInf_eq [InfSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ⊥ ∉ s)
(hs' : BddBelow ((↑) ⁻¹' s : Set α)) : sInf s = ↑(sInf ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
(if_neg hs).trans <| if_pos hs'
theorem WithBot.sSup_eq [SupSet α] {s : Set (WithBot α)} (hs : ¬s ⊆ {⊥}) (h's : BddAbove s) :
sSup s = ↑(sSup ((↑) ⁻¹' s) : α) :=
WithTop.sInf_eq (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[simp]
theorem WithTop.sInf_empty [InfSet α] : sInf (∅ : Set (WithTop α)) = ⊤ :=
if_pos <| by simp
theorem WithTop.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
obtain ⟨x, hx⟩ := hs
change _ = ite _ _ _
split_ifs with h
· rcases h with h1 | h2
· cases h1 (mem_image_of_mem _ hx)
· exact (h2 (Monotone.map_bddBelow coe_mono h's)).elim
· rw [preimage_image_eq]
exact Option.some_injective _
theorem WithTop.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithTop α) := by
classical
change _ = ite _ _ _
rw [if_neg, preimage_image_eq, if_pos hs]
· exact Option.some_injective _
· rintro ⟨x, _, ⟨⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem WithBot.sSup_empty [SupSet α] : sSup (∅ : Set (WithBot α)) = ⊥ :=
WithTop.sInf_empty (α := αᵒᵈ)
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sSup' [SupSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddAbove s) :
↑(sSup s) = (sSup ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sInf' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs h's
@[norm_cast]
theorem WithBot.coe_sInf' [InfSet α] {s : Set α} (hs : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (sInf ((fun (a : α) ↦ ↑a) '' s) : WithBot α) :=
WithTop.coe_sSup' (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
end
instance ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.toLinearOrder [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] :
LinearOrder α :=
{ ‹ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α› with
min_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂]
max_def := fun a b ↦ by
by_cases hab : a = b
· simp [hab]
· rcases ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.le_total a b with (h₁ | h₂)
· simp [h₁]
· simp [show ¬(a ≤ b) from fun h => hab (le_antisymm h h₂), h₂] }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.toOrderBot
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
/-- A complete lattice is a conditionally complete lattice, as there are no restrictions
on the properties of sInf and sSup in a complete lattice. -/
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice [CompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice α :=
{ ‹CompleteLattice α› with
le_csSup := by intros; apply le_sSup; assumption
csSup_le := by intros; apply sSup_le; assumption
csInf_le := by intros; apply sInf_le; assumption
le_csInf := by intros; apply le_sInf; assumption }
-- see Note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CompleteLinearOrder.toConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot {α : Type*}
[h : CompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α :=
{ CompleteLattice.toConditionallyCompleteLattice, h with
csSup_empty := sSup_empty
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderTop.bddAbove s)).elim
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := fun s H ↦ (H (OrderBot.bddBelow s)).elim }
namespace OrderDual
instance instConditionallyCompleteLattice (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] :
ConditionallyCompleteLattice αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instInf α, OrderDual.instSup α, OrderDual.instLattice α with
le_csSup := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le (α := α)
csSup_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf (α := α)
le_csInf := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le (α := α)
csInf_le := ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup (α := α) }
instance (α : Type*) [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] : ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder αᵒᵈ :=
{ OrderDual.instConditionallyCompleteLattice α, OrderDual.instLinearOrder α with
csSup_of_not_bddAbove := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow (α := α)
csInf_of_not_bddBelow := ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove (α := α) }
end OrderDual
section ConditionallyCompleteLattice
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] {s t : Set α} {a b : α}
theorem le_csSup (h₁ : BddAbove s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : a ≤ sSup s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csSup s a h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a) : sSup s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csSup_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem csInf_le (h₁ : BddBelow s) (h₂ : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.csInf_le s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csInf (h₁ : s.Nonempty) (h₂ : ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b) : a ≤ sInf s :=
ConditionallyCompleteLattice.le_csInf s a h₁ h₂
theorem le_csSup_of_le (hs : BddAbove s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : a ≤ b) : a ≤ sSup s :=
le_trans h (le_csSup hs hb)
theorem csInf_le_of_le (hs : BddBelow s) (hb : b ∈ s) (h : b ≤ a) : sInf s ≤ a :=
le_trans (csInf_le hs hb) h
theorem csSup_le_csSup (ht : BddAbove t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t :=
csSup_le hs fun _ ha => le_csSup ht (h ha)
theorem csInf_le_csInf (ht : BddBelow t) (hs : s.Nonempty) (h : s ⊆ t) : sInf t ≤ sInf s :=
le_csInf hs fun _ ha => csInf_le ht (h ha)
theorem le_csSup_iff (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le hs hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem csInf_le_iff (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ lowerBounds s, b ≤ a :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans (le_csInf hs hb) h, fun hb => hb _ fun _ => csInf_le h⟩
theorem isLUB_csSup (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) :=
⟨fun _ => le_csSup H, fun _ => csSup_le ne⟩
theorem isGLB_csInf (ne : s.Nonempty) (H : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) :=
⟨fun _ => csInf_le H, fun _ => le_csInf ne⟩
theorem IsLUB.csSup_eq (H : IsLUB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sSup s = a :=
(isLUB_csSup ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A greatest element of a set is the supremum of this set. -/
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_eq (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s = a :=
H.isLUB.csSup_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsGreatest.csSup_mem (H : IsGreatest s a) : sSup s ∈ s :=
H.csSup_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem IsGLB.csInf_eq (H : IsGLB s a) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = a :=
(isGLB_csInf ne ⟨a, H.1⟩).unique H
/-- A least element of a set is the infimum of this set. -/
theorem IsLeast.csInf_eq (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s = a :=
H.isGLB.csInf_eq H.nonempty
theorem IsLeast.csInf_mem (H : IsLeast s a) : sInf s ∈ s :=
H.csInf_eq.symm ▸ H.1
theorem subset_Icc_csInf_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) : s ⊆ Icc (sInf s) (sSup s) :=
fun _ hx => ⟨csInf_le hb hx, le_csSup ha hx⟩
theorem csSup_le_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, b ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup hs hb)
theorem le_csInf_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, a ≤ b :=
le_isGLB_iff (isGLB_csInf hs hb)
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf {s : Set α} (h : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sSup (lowerBounds s) = sInf s :=
(isLUB_csSup h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isGLB_csInf hs h).isLUB
theorem csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup {s : Set α} (h : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) :
sInf (upperBounds s) = sSup s :=
(isGLB_csInf h <| hs.mono fun _ hx _ hy => hy hx).unique (isLUB_csSup hs h).isGLB
theorem csSup_lowerBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddBelow (range f)) :
sSup (lowerBounds (range f)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
csSup_lowerBounds_eq_csInf hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem csInf_upperBounds_range [Nonempty β] {f : β → α} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
sInf (upperBounds (range f)) = ⨆ i, f i :=
csInf_upperBounds_eq_csSup hf <| range_nonempty _
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) (hs : BddBelow s) : x ∉ s :=
fun hx => lt_irrefl _ (h.trans_le (csInf_le hs hx))
theorem not_mem_of_csSup_lt {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : sSup s < x) (hs : BddAbove s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf (α := αᵒᵈ) h hs
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is larger than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w<b`.
See `sSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (hs : s.Nonempty) (H : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(H' : ∀ w, w < b → ∃ a ∈ s, w < a) : sSup s = b :=
(eq_of_le_of_not_lt (csSup_le hs H)) fun hb =>
let ⟨_, ha, ha'⟩ := H' _ hb
lt_irrefl _ <| ha'.trans_le <| le_csSup ⟨b, H⟩ ha
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the infimum of `s`: it suffices to check that `b`
is smaller than all elements of `s`, and that this is not the case of any `w>b`.
See `sInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt` for a version in complete lattices. -/
theorem csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt :
s.Nonempty → (∀ a ∈ s, b ≤ a) → (∀ w, b < w → ∃ a ∈ s, a < w) → sInf s = b :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- `b < sSup s` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, when `s` is bounded above.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness above for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem lt_csSup_of_lt (hs : BddAbove s) (ha : a ∈ s) (h : b < a) : b < sSup s :=
lt_of_lt_of_le h (le_csSup hs ha)
/-- `sInf s < b` when there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, when `s` is bounded below.
This is essentially an iff, except that the assumptions for the two implications are
slightly different (one needs boundedness below for one direction, nonemptiness and linear
order for the other one), so we formulate separately the two implications, contrary to
the `CompleteLattice` case. -/
theorem csInf_lt_of_lt : BddBelow s → a ∈ s → a < b → sInf s < b :=
lt_csSup_of_lt (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- If all elements of a nonempty set `s` are less than or equal to all elements
of a nonempty set `t`, then there exists an element between these sets. -/
theorem exists_between_of_forall_le (sne : s.Nonempty) (tne : t.Nonempty)
(hst : ∀ x ∈ s, ∀ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) : (upperBounds s ∩ lowerBounds t).Nonempty :=
⟨sInf t, fun x hx => le_csInf tne <| hst x hx, fun _ hy => csInf_le (sne.mono hst) hy⟩
/-- The supremum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_singleton (a : α) : sSup {a} = a :=
isGreatest_singleton.csSup_eq
/-- The infimum of a singleton is the element of the singleton -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_singleton (a : α) : sInf {a} = a :=
isLeast_singleton.csInf_eq
theorem csSup_pair (a b : α) : sSup {a, b} = a ⊔ b :=
(@isLUB_pair _ _ a b).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
theorem csInf_pair (a b : α) : sInf {a, b} = a ⊓ b :=
(@isGLB_pair _ _ a b).csInf_eq (insert_nonempty _ _)
/-- If a set is bounded below and above, and nonempty, its infimum is less than or equal to
its supremum. -/
theorem csInf_le_csSup (hb : BddBelow s) (ha : BddAbove s) (ne : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ≤ sSup s :=
isGLB_le_isLUB (isGLB_csInf ne hb) (isLUB_csSup ne ha) ne
/-- The `sSup` of a union of two sets is the max of the suprema of each subset, under the
assumptions that all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_union (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddAbove t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∪ t) = sSup s ⊔ sSup t :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).union (isLUB_csSup tne ht)).csSup_eq sne.inl
/-- The `sInf` of a union of two sets is the min of the infima of each subset, under the assumptions
that all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem csInf_union (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) (ht : BddBelow t) (tne : t.Nonempty) :
sInf (s ∪ t) = sInf s ⊓ sInf t :=
csSup_union (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne ht tne
/-- The supremum of an intersection of two sets is bounded by the minimum of the suprema of each
set, if all sets are bounded above and nonempty. -/
theorem csSup_inter_le (hs : BddAbove s) (ht : BddAbove t) (hst : (s ∩ t).Nonempty) :
sSup (s ∩ t) ≤ sSup s ⊓ sSup t :=
(csSup_le hst) fun _ hx => le_inf (le_csSup hs hx.1) (le_csSup ht hx.2)
/-- The infimum of an intersection of two sets is bounded below by the maximum of the
infima of each set, if all sets are bounded below and nonempty. -/
theorem le_csInf_inter :
BddBelow s → BddBelow t → (s ∩ t).Nonempty → sInf s ⊔ sInf t ≤ sInf (s ∩ t) :=
csSup_inter_le (α := αᵒᵈ)
/-- The supremum of `insert a s` is the maximum of `a` and the supremum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded above. -/
@[simp]
theorem csSup_insert (hs : BddAbove s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sSup (insert a s) = a ⊔ sSup s :=
((isLUB_csSup sne hs).insert a).csSup_eq (insert_nonempty a s)
/-- The infimum of `insert a s` is the minimum of `a` and the infimum of `s`, if `s` is
nonempty and bounded below. -/
@[simp]
theorem csInf_insert (hs : BddBelow s) (sne : s.Nonempty) : sInf (insert a s) = a ⊓ sInf s :=
csSup_insert (α := αᵒᵈ) hs sne
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sInf (Icc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Icc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ici : sInf (Ici a) = a :=
isLeast_Ici.csInf_eq
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ico (h : a < b) : sInf (Ico a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ico h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioc [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioc a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioc h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioi [NoMaxOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sInf (Ioi a) = a :=
csInf_eq_of_forall_ge_of_forall_gt_exists_lt nonempty_Ioi (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csInf_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sInf (Ioo a b) = a :=
(isGLB_Ioo h).csInf_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Icc (h : a ≤ b) : sSup (Icc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Icc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Icc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ico [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ico a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ico h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ico.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iic : sSup (Iic a) = a :=
isGreatest_Iic.csSup_eq
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Iio [NoMinOrder α] [DenselyOrdered α] : sSup (Iio a) = a :=
csSup_eq_of_forall_le_of_forall_lt_exists_gt nonempty_Iio (fun _ => le_of_lt) fun w hw => by
simpa [and_comm] using exists_between hw
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioc (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioc a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioc h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioc.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem csSup_Ioo [DenselyOrdered α] (h : a < b) : sSup (Ioo a b) = b :=
(isLUB_Ioo h).csSup_eq (nonempty_Ioo.2 h)
/-- Introduction rule to prove that `b` is the supremum of `s`: it suffices to check that
1) `b` is an upper bound
2) every other upper bound `b'` satisfies `b ≤ b'`. -/
theorem csSup_eq_of_is_forall_le_of_forall_le_imp_ge (hs : s.Nonempty) (h_is_ub : ∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ b)
(h_b_le_ub : ∀ ub, (∀ a ∈ s, a ≤ ub) → b ≤ ub) : sSup s = b :=
(csSup_le hs h_is_ub).antisymm ((h_b_le_ub _) fun _ => le_csSup ⟨b, h_is_ub⟩)
lemma sup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] (h : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
top_unique <| le_csSup (OrderTop.bddAbove s) h
lemma inf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] (h : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
bot_unique <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h
end ConditionallyCompleteLattice
instance Pi.conditionallyCompleteLattice {ι : Type*} {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, ConditionallyCompleteLattice (α i)] : ConditionallyCompleteLattice (∀ i, α i) :=
{ Pi.instLattice, Pi.supSet, Pi.infSet with
le_csSup := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
le_csSup ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
csSup_le := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(csSup_le (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i
csInf_le := fun _ f ⟨g, hg⟩ hf i =>
csInf_le ⟨g i, Set.forall_mem_range.2 fun ⟨_, hf'⟩ => hg hf' i⟩ ⟨⟨f, hf⟩, rfl⟩
le_csInf := fun s _ hs hf i =>
(le_csInf (by haveI := hs.to_subtype; apply range_nonempty)) fun _ ⟨⟨_, hg⟩, hb⟩ =>
hb ▸ hf hg i }
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder α] {f : ι → α} {s : Set α} {a b : α}
/-- When `b < sSup s`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `b < a`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : b < sSup s) : ∃ a ∈ s, b < a := by
contrapose! hb
exact csSup_le hs hb
/-- When `sInf s < b`, there is an element `a` in `s` with `a < b`, if `s` is nonempty and the order
is a linear order. -/
theorem exists_lt_of_csInf_lt (hs : s.Nonempty) (hb : sInf s < b) : ∃ a ∈ s, a < b :=
exists_lt_of_lt_csSup (α := αᵒᵈ) hs hb
theorem lt_csSup_iff (hb : BddAbove s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b :=
lt_isLUB_iff <| isLUB_csSup hs hb
theorem csInf_lt_iff (hb : BddBelow s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s < a ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, b < a :=
isGLB_lt_iff <| isGLB_csInf hs hb
@[simp] lemma csSup_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csSup_of_not_bddAbove s hs
@[simp] lemma ciSup_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup ∅ :=
csSup_of_not_bddAbove hf
lemma csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hs : ¬BddAbove s) : sSup s = sSup univ := by
rw [csSup_of_not_bddAbove hs, csSup_of_not_bddAbove (s := univ)]
contrapose! hs
exact hs.mono (subset_univ _)
lemma ciSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (hf : ¬BddAbove (range f)) : ⨆ i, f i = sSup univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove hf
@[simp] lemma csInf_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf ∅ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder.csInf_of_not_bddBelow s hs
@[simp] lemma ciInf_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf ∅ :=
csInf_of_not_bddBelow hf
lemma csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hs : ¬BddBelow s) : sInf s = sInf univ :=
csSup_eq_univ_of_not_bddAbove (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
lemma ciInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow (hf : ¬BddBelow (range f)) : ⨅ i, f i = sInf univ :=
csInf_eq_univ_of_not_bddBelow hf
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same supremum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, x ≤ y) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, y ≤ x) :
sSup s = sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl|s_ne
· have : t = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun y yt ↦ by simpa using ht y yt)
rw [this]
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty t with rfl|t_ne
· have : s = ∅ := eq_empty_of_forall_not_mem (fun x xs ↦ by simpa using hs x xs)
rw [this]
by_cases B : BddAbove s ∨ BddAbove t
· have Bs : BddAbove s := by
rcases B with hB|⟨b, hb⟩
· exact hB
· refine ⟨b, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, hy, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (hb hy)
have Bt : BddAbove t := by
rcases B with ⟨b, hb⟩|hB
· refine ⟨b, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, hx, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (hb hx)
· exact hB
apply le_antisymm
· apply csSup_le s_ne (fun x hx ↦ ?_)
rcases hs x hx with ⟨y, yt, hxy⟩
exact hxy.trans (le_csSup Bt yt)
· apply csSup_le t_ne (fun y hy ↦ ?_)
rcases ht y hy with ⟨x, xs, hyx⟩
exact hyx.trans (le_csSup Bs xs)
· simp [csSup_of_not_bddAbove, (not_or.1 B).1, (not_or.1 B).2]
/-- When every element of a set `s` is bounded by an element of a set `t`, and conversely, then
`s` and `t` have the same infimum. This holds even when the sets may be empty or unbounded. -/
theorem csInf_eq_csInf_of_forall_exists_le {s t : Set α}
(hs : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ y ∈ t, y ≤ x) (ht : ∀ y ∈ t, ∃ x ∈ s, x ≤ y) :
sInf s = sInf t :=
csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le (α := αᵒᵈ) hs ht
lemma sSup_iUnion_Iic (f : ι → α) : sSup (⋃ (i : ι), Iic (f i)) = ⨆ i, f i := by
apply csSup_eq_csSup_of_forall_exists_le
· rintro x ⟨-, ⟨i, rfl⟩, hi⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_range_self _, hi⟩
· rintro x ⟨i, rfl⟩
exact ⟨f i, mem_iUnion_of_mem i le_rfl, le_rfl⟩
lemma sInf_iUnion_Ici (f : ι → α) : sInf (⋃ (i : ι), Ici (f i)) = ⨅ i, f i :=
sSup_iUnion_Iic (α := αᵒᵈ) f
theorem csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem [OrderBot α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊥ ∈ s) : sInf s = ⊥ :=
eq_bot_iff.2 <| csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow s) hs
theorem csSup_eq_top_of_top_mem [OrderTop α] {s : Set α} (hs : ⊤ ∈ s) : sSup s = ⊤ :=
csInf_eq_bot_of_bot_mem (α := αᵒᵈ) hs
open Function
variable [WellFoundedLT α]
theorem sInf_eq_argmin_on (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s = argminOn id s hs :=
IsLeast.csInf_eq ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun _ ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem isLeast_csInf (hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLeast s (sInf s) := by
rw [sInf_eq_argmin_on hs]
exact ⟨argminOn_mem _ _ _, fun a ha => argminOn_le id _ ha⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff' (hs : s.Nonempty) : b ≤ sInf s ↔ b ∈ lowerBounds s :=
le_isGLB_iff (isLeast_csInf hs).isGLB
theorem csInf_mem (hs : s.Nonempty) : sInf s ∈ s :=
(isLeast_csInf hs).1
theorem MonotoneOn.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : MonotoneOn f s) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
theorem Monotone.map_csInf {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β}
(hf : Monotone f) (hs : s.Nonempty) : f (sInf s) = sInf (f '' s) :=
(hf.map_isLeast (isLeast_csInf hs)).csInf_eq.symm
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrder
/-!
### Lemmas about a conditionally complete linear order with bottom element
In this case we have `Sup ∅ = ⊥`, so we can drop some `Nonempty`/`Set.Nonempty` assumptions.
-/
section ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
@[simp]
theorem csInf_univ [ConditionallyCompleteLattice α] [OrderBot α] : sInf (univ : Set α) = ⊥ :=
isLeast_univ.csInf_eq
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α] {s : Set α} {a : α}
@[simp]
theorem csSup_empty : (sSup ∅ : α) = ⊥ :=
ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot.csSup_empty
theorem isLUB_csSup' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hne)
· simp only [csSup_empty, isLUB_empty]
· exact isLUB_csSup hne hs
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `csSup_le_iff`. -/
theorem csSup_le_iff' {s : Set α} (hs : BddAbove s) {a : α} : sSup s ≤ a ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, x ≤ a :=
isLUB_le_iff (isLUB_csSup' hs)
theorem csSup_le' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∈ upperBounds s) : sSup s ≤ a :=
(csSup_le_iff' ⟨a, h⟩).2 h
/-- In conditionally complete orders with a bottom element, the nonempty condition can be omitted
from `lt_csSup_iff`. -/
theorem lt_csSup_iff' (hb : BddAbove s) : a < sSup s ↔ ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
simpa only [not_le, not_forall₂, exists_prop] using (csSup_le_iff' hb).not
theorem le_csSup_iff' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : BddAbove s) :
a ≤ sSup s ↔ ∀ b, b ∈ upperBounds s → a ≤ b :=
⟨fun h _ hb => le_trans h (csSup_le' hb), fun hb => hb _ fun _ => le_csSup h⟩
theorem le_csInf_iff'' {s : Set α} {a : α} (ne : s.Nonempty) :
a ≤ sInf s ↔ ∀ b : α, b ∈ s → a ≤ b :=
le_csInf_iff (OrderBot.bddBelow _) ne
theorem csInf_le' (h : a ∈ s) : sInf s ≤ a := csInf_le (OrderBot.bddBelow _) h
theorem exists_lt_of_lt_csSup' {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a < sSup s) : ∃ b ∈ s, a < b := by
contrapose! h
exact csSup_le' h
theorem not_mem_of_lt_csInf' {x : α} {s : Set α} (h : x < sInf s) : x ∉ s :=
not_mem_of_lt_csInf h (OrderBot.bddBelow s)
theorem csInf_le_csInf' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : t.Nonempty) (h₂ : t ⊆ s) : sInf s ≤ sInf t :=
csInf_le_csInf (OrderBot.bddBelow s) h₁ h₂
theorem csSup_le_csSup' {s t : Set α} (h₁ : BddAbove t) (h₂ : s ⊆ t) : sSup s ≤ sSup t := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with rfl | h
· rw [csSup_empty]
exact bot_le
· exact csSup_le_csSup h₁ h h₂
end ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot
namespace WithTop
variable [ConditionallyCompleteLinearOrderBot α]
/-- The `sSup` of a non-empty set is its least upper bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isLUB_sSup' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : s.Nonempty) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· contradiction
apply coe_le_coe.2
exact le_csSup h₂ ha
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
split_ifs with h₁ h₂
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_rfl
· exact False.elim (not_top_le_coe a (ha h₁))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csSup_le ?_ ?_)
· rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exact absurd hb h₁
· exact ⟨b, hb⟩
· intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
· rintro (⟨⟩ | b) hb
· exact le_rfl
· exfalso
apply h₂
use b
intro a ha
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb ha)
theorem isLUB_sSup (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsLUB s (sSup s) := by
rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hs
· simp [sSup]
· exact isLUB_sSup' hs
/-- The `sInf` of a bounded-below set is its greatest lower bound for a conditionally
complete lattice with a top. -/
theorem isGLB_sInf' {β : Type*} [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {s : Set (WithTop β)}
(hs : BddBelow s) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
classical
constructor
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro a ha
exact top_le_iff.2 (Set.mem_singleton_iff.1 (h ha))
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact le_top
refine coe_le_coe.2 (csInf_le ?_ ha)
rcases hs with ⟨⟨⟩ | b, hb⟩
· exfalso
apply h
intro c hc
rw [mem_singleton_iff, ← top_le_iff]
exact hb hc
use b
intro c hc
exact coe_le_coe.1 (hb hc)
· show ite _ _ _ ∈ _
simp only [hs, not_true_eq_false, or_false]
split_ifs with h
· intro _ _
exact le_top
· rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exfalso
apply h
intro b hb
exact Set.mem_singleton_iff.2 (top_le_iff.1 (ha hb))
· refine coe_le_coe.2 (le_csInf ?_ ?_)
· classical
contrapose! h
rintro (⟨⟩ | a) ha
· exact mem_singleton ⊤
· exact (not_nonempty_iff_eq_empty.2 h ⟨a, ha⟩).elim
· intro b hb
rw [← coe_le_coe]
exact ha hb
theorem isGLB_sInf (s : Set (WithTop α)) : IsGLB s (sInf s) := by
by_cases hs : BddBelow s
· exact isGLB_sInf' hs
· exfalso
apply hs
use ⊥
intro _ _
exact bot_le
noncomputable instance : CompleteLinearOrder (WithTop α) where
__ := linearOrder
__ := LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra
le_sSup s := (isLUB_sSup s).1
sSup_le s := (isLUB_sSup s).2
le_sInf s := (isGLB_sInf s).2
sInf_le s := (isGLB_sInf s).1
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sSup'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sSup {s : Set α} (hb : BddAbove s) : ↑(sSup s) = (⨆ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sSup' hb, sSup_image]
/-- A version of `WithTop.coe_sInf'` with a more convenient but less general statement. -/
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_sInf {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) (h's : BddBelow s) :
↑(sInf s) = (⨅ a ∈ s, ↑a : WithTop α) := by
rw [coe_sInf' hs h's, sInf_image]
end WithTop
namespace Monotone
variable [Preorder α] [ConditionallyCompleteLattice β] {f : α → β} (h_mono : Monotone f)
include h_mono
/-! A monotone function into a conditionally complete lattice preserves the ordering properties of
`sSup` and `sInf`. -/
theorem le_csSup_image {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddAbove s) :
f c ≤ sSup (f '' s) :=
le_csSup (map_bddAbove h_mono h_bdd) (mem_image_of_mem f hcs)
theorem csSup_image_le {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ upperBounds s) :
sSup (f '' s) ≤ f B :=
csSup_le (Nonempty.image f hs) (h_mono.mem_upperBounds_image hB)
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem csInf_image_le {s : Set α} {c : α} (hcs : c ∈ s) (h_bdd : BddBelow s) :
sInf (f '' s) ≤ f c := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact le_csSup_image (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
(show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hcs h_bdd
-- Porting note: in mathlib3 `f'` is not needed
theorem le_csInf_image {s : Set α} (hs : s.Nonempty) {B : α} (hB : B ∈ lowerBounds s) :
f B ≤ sInf (f '' s) := by
let f' : αᵒᵈ → βᵒᵈ := f
exact csSup_image_le (α := αᵒᵈ) (β := βᵒᵈ)
| (show Monotone f' from fun x y hxy => h_mono hxy) hs hB
end Monotone
| Mathlib/Order/ConditionallyCompleteLattice/Basic.lean | 781 | 783 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Patrick Massot
-/
import Mathlib.Order.Filter.SmallSets
import Mathlib.Topology.UniformSpace.Defs
import Mathlib.Topology.ContinuousOn
/-!
# Basic results on uniform spaces
Uniform spaces are a generalization of metric spaces and topological groups.
## Main definitions
In this file we define a complete lattice structure on the type `UniformSpace X`
of uniform structures on `X`, as well as the pullback (`UniformSpace.comap`) of uniform structures
coming from the pullback of filters.
Like distance functions, uniform structures cannot be pushed forward in general.
## Notations
Localized in `Uniformity`, we have the notation `𝓤 X` for the uniformity on a uniform space `X`,
and `○` for composition of relations, seen as terms with type `Set (X × X)`.
## References
The formalization uses the books:
* [N. Bourbaki, *General Topology*][bourbaki1966]
* [I. M. James, *Topologies and Uniformities*][james1999]
But it makes a more systematic use of the filter library.
-/
open Set Filter Topology
universe u v ua ub uc ud
/-!
### Relations, seen as `Set (α × α)`
-/
variable {α : Type ua} {β : Type ub} {γ : Type uc} {δ : Type ud} {ι : Sort*}
open Uniformity
section UniformSpace
variable [UniformSpace α]
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for any natural `n`, for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ○ ... ○ t ⊆ s` (`n` compositions). -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) (n : ℕ) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s := by
suffices ∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ⊆ s ∧ (t ○ ·)^[n] t ⊆ s from (eventually_and.1 this).2
induction n generalizing s with
| zero => simpa
| succ _ ihn =>
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs with ⟨t, htU, hts⟩
refine (ihn htU).mono fun U hU => ?_
rw [Function.iterate_succ_apply']
exact
⟨hU.1.trans <| (subset_comp_self <| refl_le_uniformity htU).trans hts,
(compRel_mono hU.1 hU.2).trans hts⟩
/-- If `s ∈ 𝓤 α`, then for a subset `t` of a sufficiently small set in `𝓤 α`,
we have `t ○ t ⊆ s`. -/
theorem eventually_uniformity_comp_subset {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∀ᶠ t in (𝓤 α).smallSets, t ○ t ⊆ s :=
eventually_uniformity_iterate_comp_subset hs 1
/-!
### Balls in uniform spaces
-/
namespace UniformSpace
open UniformSpace (ball)
lemma isOpen_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsOpen V) : IsOpen (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
lemma isClosed_ball (x : α) {V : Set (α × α)} (hV : IsClosed V) : IsClosed (ball x V) :=
hV.preimage <| .prodMk_right _
/-!
### Neighborhoods in uniform spaces
-/
theorem hasBasis_nhds_prod (x y : α) :
HasBasis (𝓝 (x, y)) (fun s => s ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel s) fun s => ball x s ×ˢ ball y s := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
apply (hasBasis_nhds x).prod_same_index (hasBasis_nhds y)
rintro U V ⟨U_in, U_symm⟩ ⟨V_in, V_symm⟩
exact
⟨U ∩ V, ⟨(𝓤 α).inter_sets U_in V_in, U_symm.inter V_symm⟩, ball_inter_left x U V,
ball_inter_right y U V⟩
end UniformSpace
open UniformSpace
theorem nhds_eq_uniformity_prod {a b : α} :
𝓝 (a, b) =
(𝓤 α).lift' fun s : Set (α × α) => { y : α | (y, a) ∈ s } ×ˢ { y : α | (b, y) ∈ s } := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq, nhds_nhds_eq_uniformity_uniformity_prod, lift_lift'_same_eq_lift']
· exact fun s => monotone_const.set_prod monotone_preimage
· refine fun t => Monotone.set_prod ?_ monotone_const
exact monotone_preimage (f := fun y => (y, a))
theorem nhdset_of_mem_uniformity {d : Set (α × α)} (s : Set (α × α)) (hd : d ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t : Set (α × α), IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧
t ⊆ { p | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d } := by
let cl_d := { p : α × α | ∃ x y, (p.1, x) ∈ d ∧ (x, y) ∈ s ∧ (y, p.2) ∈ d }
have : ∀ p ∈ s, ∃ t, t ⊆ cl_d ∧ IsOpen t ∧ p ∈ t := fun ⟨x, y⟩ hp =>
mem_nhds_iff.mp <|
show cl_d ∈ 𝓝 (x, y) by
rw [nhds_eq_uniformity_prod, mem_lift'_sets]
· exact ⟨d, hd, fun ⟨a, b⟩ ⟨ha, hb⟩ => ⟨x, y, ha, hp, hb⟩⟩
· exact fun _ _ h _ h' => ⟨h h'.1, h h'.2⟩
choose t ht using this
exact ⟨(⋃ p : α × α, ⋃ h : p ∈ s, t p h : Set (α × α)),
isOpen_iUnion fun p : α × α => isOpen_iUnion fun hp => (ht p hp).right.left,
fun ⟨a, b⟩ hp => by
simp only [mem_iUnion, Prod.exists]; exact ⟨a, b, hp, (ht (a, b) hp).right.right⟩,
iUnion_subset fun p => iUnion_subset fun hp => (ht p hp).left⟩
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhds_le_uniformity (x : α) : 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α := by
intro V V_in
rcases comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets V_in with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, w_sub⟩
have : ball x w ×ˢ ball x w ∈ 𝓝 (x, x) := by
rw [nhds_prod_eq]
exact prod_mem_prod (ball_mem_nhds x w_in) (ball_mem_nhds x w_in)
apply mem_of_superset this
rintro ⟨u, v⟩ ⟨u_in, v_in⟩
exact w_sub (mem_comp_of_mem_ball w_symm u_in v_in)
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem iSup_nhds_le_uniformity : ⨆ x : α, 𝓝 (x, x) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
iSup_le nhds_le_uniformity
/-- Entourages are neighborhoods of the diagonal. -/
theorem nhdsSet_diagonal_le_uniformity : 𝓝ˢ (diagonal α) ≤ 𝓤 α :=
(nhdsSet_diagonal α).trans_le iSup_nhds_le_uniformity
section
variable (α)
theorem UniformSpace.has_seq_basis [IsCountablyGenerated <| 𝓤 α] :
∃ V : ℕ → Set (α × α), HasAntitoneBasis (𝓤 α) V ∧ ∀ n, IsSymmetricRel (V n) :=
let ⟨U, hsym, hbasis⟩ := (@UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric α _).exists_antitone_subbasis
⟨U, hbasis, fun n => (hsym n).2⟩
end
/-!
### Closure and interior in uniform spaces
-/
theorem closure_eq_uniformity (s : Set <| α × α) :
closure s = ⋂ V ∈ { V | V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V }, V ○ s ○ V := by
ext ⟨x, y⟩
simp +contextual only
[mem_closure_iff_nhds_basis (UniformSpace.hasBasis_nhds_prod x y), mem_iInter, mem_setOf_eq,
and_imp, mem_comp_comp, exists_prop, ← mem_inter_iff, inter_comm, Set.Nonempty]
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closed :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsClosed V) id := by
refine Filter.hasBasis_self.2 fun t h => ?_
rcases comp_comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets h with ⟨w, w_in, w_symm, r⟩
refine ⟨closure w, mem_of_superset w_in subset_closure, isClosed_closure, ?_⟩
refine Subset.trans ?_ r
rw [closure_eq_uniformity]
apply iInter_subset_of_subset
apply iInter_subset
exact ⟨w_in, w_symm⟩
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' closure :=
Eq.symm <| uniformity_hasBasis_closed.lift'_closure_eq_self fun _ => And.right
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_closure {p : ι → Prop} {U : ι → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p U) : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p fun i => closure (U i) :=
(@uniformity_eq_uniformity_closure α _).symm ▸ h.lift'_closure
/-- Closed entourages form a basis of the uniformity filter. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_closure : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α) closure :=
(𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_closure
theorem closure_eq_inter_uniformity {t : Set (α × α)} : closure t = ⋂ d ∈ 𝓤 α, d ○ (t ○ d) :=
calc
closure t = ⋂ (V) (_ : V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsSymmetricRel V), V ○ t ○ V := closure_eq_uniformity t
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ t ○ V :=
Eq.symm <|
UniformSpace.hasBasis_symmetric.biInter_mem fun _ _ hV =>
compRel_mono (compRel_mono hV Subset.rfl) hV
_ = ⋂ V ∈ 𝓤 α, V ○ (t ○ V) := by simp only [compRel_assoc]
theorem uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior : 𝓤 α = (𝓤 α).lift' interior :=
le_antisymm
(le_iInf₂ fun d hd => by
let ⟨s, hs, hs_comp⟩ := comp3_mem_uniformity hd
let ⟨t, ht, hst, ht_comp⟩ := nhdset_of_mem_uniformity s hs
have : s ⊆ interior d :=
calc
s ⊆ t := hst
_ ⊆ interior d :=
ht.subset_interior_iff.mpr fun x (hx : x ∈ t) =>
let ⟨x, y, h₁, h₂, h₃⟩ := ht_comp hx
hs_comp ⟨x, h₁, y, h₂, h₃⟩
have : interior d ∈ 𝓤 α := by filter_upwards [hs] using this
simp [this])
fun _ hs => ((𝓤 α).lift' interior).sets_of_superset (mem_lift' hs) interior_subset
theorem interior_mem_uniformity {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : interior s ∈ 𝓤 α := by
rw [uniformity_eq_uniformity_interior]; exact mem_lift' hs
theorem mem_uniformity_isClosed {s : Set (α × α)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 α) : ∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsClosed t ∧ t ⊆ s :=
let ⟨t, ⟨ht_mem, htc⟩, hts⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_closed.mem_iff.1 h
⟨t, ht_mem, htc, hts⟩
theorem isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset {s : Set α} :
IsOpen s ↔ ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ V ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen V ∧ ball x V ⊆ s := by
rw [isOpen_iff_ball_subset]
constructor <;> intro h x hx
· obtain ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact
⟨interior V, interior_mem_uniformity hV, isOpen_interior,
(ball_mono interior_subset x).trans hV'⟩
· obtain ⟨V, hV, -, hV'⟩ := h x hx
exact ⟨V, hV, hV'⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-18")] alias
isOpen_iff_open_ball_subset := isOpen_iff_isOpen_ball_subset
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense set cover the whole space. -/
theorem Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball {s : Set α} {U : Set (α × α)} (hs : Dense s) (hU : U ∈ 𝓤 α) :
⋃ x ∈ s, ball x U = univ := by
refine iUnion₂_eq_univ_iff.2 fun y => ?_
rcases hs.inter_nhds_nonempty (mem_nhds_right y hU) with ⟨x, hxs, hxy : (x, y) ∈ U⟩
exact ⟨x, hxs, hxy⟩
/-- The uniform neighborhoods of all points of a dense indexed collection cover the whole space. -/
lemma DenseRange.iUnion_uniformity_ball {ι : Type*} {xs : ι → α}
(xs_dense : DenseRange xs) {U : Set (α × α)} (hU : U ∈ uniformity α) :
⋃ i, UniformSpace.ball (xs i) U = univ := by
rw [← biUnion_range (f := xs) (g := fun x ↦ UniformSpace.ball x U)]
exact Dense.biUnion_uniformity_ball xs_dense hU
/-!
### Uniformity bases
-/
/-- Open elements of `𝓤 α` form a basis of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open : HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V) id :=
hasBasis_self.2 fun s hs =>
⟨interior s, interior_mem_uniformity hs, isOpen_interior, interior_subset⟩
theorem Filter.HasBasis.mem_uniformity_iff {p : β → Prop} {s : β → Set (α × α)}
(h : (𝓤 α).HasBasis p s) {t : Set (α × α)} :
t ∈ 𝓤 α ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ ∀ a b, (a, b) ∈ s i → (a, b) ∈ t :=
h.mem_iff.trans <| by simp only [Prod.forall, subset_def]
/-- Open elements `s : Set (α × α)` of `𝓤 α` such that `(x, y) ∈ s ↔ (y, x) ∈ s` form a basis
of `𝓤 α`. -/
theorem uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric :
HasBasis (𝓤 α) (fun V : Set (α × α) => V ∈ 𝓤 α ∧ IsOpen V ∧ IsSymmetricRel V) id := by
simp only [← and_assoc]
refine uniformity_hasBasis_open.restrict fun s hs => ⟨symmetrizeRel s, ?_⟩
exact
⟨⟨symmetrize_mem_uniformity hs.1, IsOpen.inter hs.2 (hs.2.preimage continuous_swap)⟩,
symmetric_symmetrizeRel s, symmetrizeRel_subset_self s⟩
theorem comp_open_symm_mem_uniformity_sets {s : Set (α × α)} (hs : s ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t ∈ 𝓤 α, IsOpen t ∧ IsSymmetricRel t ∧ t ○ t ⊆ s := by
obtain ⟨t, ht₁, ht₂⟩ := comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs
obtain ⟨u, ⟨hu₁, hu₂, hu₃⟩, hu₄ : u ⊆ t⟩ := uniformity_hasBasis_open_symmetric.mem_iff.mp ht₁
exact ⟨u, hu₁, hu₂, hu₃, (compRel_mono hu₄ hu₄).trans ht₂⟩
end UniformSpace
open uniformity
section Constructions
instance : PartialOrder (UniformSpace α) :=
PartialOrder.lift (fun u => 𝓤[u]) fun _ _ => UniformSpace.ext
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_def {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} : u₁ ≤ u₂ ↔ 𝓤[u₁] ≤ 𝓤[u₂] := Iff.rfl
instance : InfSet (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun s =>
UniformSpace.ofCore
{ uniformity := ⨅ u ∈ s, 𝓤[u]
refl := le_iInf fun u => le_iInf fun _ => u.toCore.refl
symm := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (map_mono <| iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) u.symm
comp := le_iInf₂ fun u hu =>
le_trans (lift'_mono (iInf_le_of_le _ <| iInf_le _ hu) <| le_rfl) u.comp }⟩
protected theorem UniformSpace.sInf_le {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : t ∈ tt) : sInf tt ≤ t :=
show ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] ≤ 𝓤[t] from iInf₂_le t h
protected theorem UniformSpace.le_sInf {tt : Set (UniformSpace α)} {t : UniformSpace α}
(h : ∀ t' ∈ tt, t ≤ t') : t ≤ sInf tt :=
show 𝓤[t] ≤ ⨅ u ∈ tt, 𝓤[u] from le_iInf₂ h
instance : Top (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.mk α ⊤ ⊤ le_top le_top fun x ↦ by simp only [nhds_top, comap_top]⟩
instance : Bot (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨{ toTopologicalSpace := ⊥
uniformity := 𝓟 idRel
symm := by simp [Tendsto]
comp := lift'_le (mem_principal_self _) <| principal_mono.2 id_compRel.subset
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun s => by
let _ : TopologicalSpace α := ⊥; have := discreteTopology_bot α
simp [idRel] }⟩
instance : Min (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨fun u₁ u₂ =>
{ uniformity := 𝓤[u₁] ⊓ 𝓤[u₂]
symm := u₁.symm.inf u₂.symm
comp := (lift'_inf_le _ _ _).trans <| inf_le_inf u₁.comp u₂.comp
toTopologicalSpace := u₁.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ u₂.toTopologicalSpace
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity := fun _ ↦ by
rw [@nhds_inf _ u₁.toTopologicalSpace _, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₁,
@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ u₂, comap_inf] }⟩
instance : CompleteLattice (UniformSpace α) :=
{ inferInstanceAs (PartialOrder (UniformSpace α)) with
sup := fun a b => sInf { x | a ≤ x ∧ b ≤ x }
le_sup_left := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨h, _⟩ => h
le_sup_right := fun _ _ => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ ⟨_, h⟩ => h
sup_le := fun _ _ _ h₁ h₂ => UniformSpace.sInf_le ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
le_inf := fun a _ _ h₁ h₂ => show a.uniformity ≤ _ from le_inf h₁ h₂
inf_le_left := fun a _ => show _ ≤ a.uniformity from inf_le_left
inf_le_right := fun _ b => show _ ≤ b.uniformity from inf_le_right
top := ⊤
le_top := fun a => show a.uniformity ≤ ⊤ from le_top
bot := ⊥
bot_le := fun u => u.toCore.refl
sSup := fun tt => sInf { t | ∀ t' ∈ tt, t' ≤ t }
le_sSup := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.le_sInf fun _ h' => h' _ h
sSup_le := fun _ _ h => UniformSpace.sInf_le h
sInf := sInf
le_sInf := fun _ _ hs => UniformSpace.le_sInf hs
sInf_le := fun _ _ ha => UniformSpace.sInf_le ha }
theorem iInf_uniformity {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[iInf u] = ⨅ i, 𝓤[u i] :=
iInf_range
theorem inf_uniformity {u v : UniformSpace α} : 𝓤[u ⊓ v] = 𝓤[u] ⊓ 𝓤[v] := rfl
lemma bot_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊥ : UniformSpace α)] = 𝓟 idRel := rfl
lemma top_uniformity : 𝓤[(⊤ : UniformSpace α)] = ⊤ := rfl
instance inhabitedUniformSpace : Inhabited (UniformSpace α) :=
⟨⊥⟩
instance inhabitedUniformSpaceCore : Inhabited (UniformSpace.Core α) :=
⟨@UniformSpace.toCore _ default⟩
instance [Subsingleton α] : Unique (UniformSpace α) where
uniq u := bot_unique <| le_principal_iff.2 <| by
rw [idRel, ← diagonal, diagonal_eq_univ]; exact univ_mem
/-- Given `f : α → β` and a uniformity `u` on `β`, the inverse image of `u` under `f`
is the inverse image in the filter sense of the induced function `α × α → β × β`.
See note [reducible non-instances]. -/
abbrev UniformSpace.comap (f : α → β) (u : UniformSpace β) : UniformSpace α where
uniformity := 𝓤[u].comap fun p : α × α => (f p.1, f p.2)
symm := by
simp only [tendsto_comap_iff, Prod.swap, (· ∘ ·)]
exact tendsto_swap_uniformity.comp tendsto_comap
comp := le_trans
(by
rw [comap_lift'_eq, comap_lift'_eq2]
· exact lift'_mono' fun s _ ⟨a₁, a₂⟩ ⟨x, h₁, h₂⟩ => ⟨f x, h₁, h₂⟩
· exact monotone_id.compRel monotone_id)
(comap_mono u.comp)
toTopologicalSpace := u.toTopologicalSpace.induced f
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
simp only [nhds_induced, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_comap {_ : UniformSpace β} (f : α → β) :
𝓤[UniformSpace.comap f ‹_›] = comap (Prod.map f f) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma ball_preimage {f : α → β} {U : Set (β × β)} {x : α} :
UniformSpace.ball x (Prod.map f f ⁻¹' U) = f ⁻¹' UniformSpace.ball (f x) U := by
ext : 1
simp only [UniformSpace.ball, mem_preimage, Prod.map_apply]
@[simp]
theorem uniformSpace_comap_id {α : Type*} : UniformSpace.comap (id : α → α) = id := by
ext : 2
rw [uniformity_comap, Prod.map_id, comap_id]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_comap {α β γ} {uγ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → β} {g : β → γ} :
UniformSpace.comap (g ∘ f) uγ = UniformSpace.comap f (UniformSpace.comap g uγ) := by
ext1
simp only [uniformity_comap, Filter.comap_comap, Prod.map_comp_map]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_inf {α γ} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(u₁ ⊓ u₂).comap f = u₁.comap f ⊓ u₂.comap f :=
UniformSpace.ext Filter.comap_inf
theorem UniformSpace.comap_iInf {ι α γ} {u : ι → UniformSpace γ} {f : α → γ} :
(⨅ i, u i).comap f = ⨅ i, (u i).comap f := by
ext : 1
simp [uniformity_comap, iInf_uniformity]
theorem UniformSpace.comap_mono {α γ} {f : α → γ} :
Monotone fun u : UniformSpace γ => u.comap f := fun _ _ hu =>
Filter.comap_mono hu
theorem uniformContinuous_iff {α β} {uα : UniformSpace α} {uβ : UniformSpace β} {f : α → β} :
UniformContinuous f ↔ uα ≤ uβ.comap f :=
Filter.map_le_iff_le_comap
theorem le_iff_uniformContinuous_id {u v : UniformSpace α} :
u ≤ v ↔ @UniformContinuous _ _ u v id := by
rw [uniformContinuous_iff, uniformSpace_comap_id, id]
theorem uniformContinuous_comap {f : α → β} [u : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformContinuous α β (UniformSpace.comap f u) u f :=
tendsto_comap
theorem uniformContinuous_comap' {f : γ → β} {g : α → γ} [v : UniformSpace β] [u : UniformSpace α]
(h : UniformContinuous (f ∘ g)) : @UniformContinuous α γ u (UniformSpace.comap f v) g :=
tendsto_comap_iff.2 h
namespace UniformSpace
theorem to_nhds_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) (a : α) :
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁) a ≤
@nhds _ (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂) a := by
rw [@nhds_eq_uniformity α u₁ a, @nhds_eq_uniformity α u₂ a]; exact lift'_mono h le_rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_mono {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} (h : u₁ ≤ u₂) :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₁ ≤ @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ u₂ :=
le_of_nhds_le_nhds <| to_nhds_mono h
theorem toTopologicalSpace_comap {f : α → β} {u : UniformSpace β} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace _ (UniformSpace.comap f u) =
TopologicalSpace.induced f (@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace β u) :=
rfl
lemma uniformSpace_eq_bot {u : UniformSpace α} : u = ⊥ ↔ idRel ∈ 𝓤[u] :=
le_bot_iff.symm.trans le_principal_iff
protected lemma _root_.Filter.HasBasis.uniformSpace_eq_bot {ι p} {s : ι → Set (α × α)}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h : 𝓤[u].HasBasis p s) :
u = ⊥ ↔ ∃ i, p i ∧ Pairwise fun x y : α ↦ (x, y) ∉ s i := by
simp [uniformSpace_eq_bot, h.mem_iff, subset_def, Pairwise, not_imp_not]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_bot : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊥ = ⊥ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_top : @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α ⊤ = ⊤ := rfl
theorem toTopologicalSpace_iInf {ι : Sort*} {u : ι → UniformSpace α} :
(iInf u).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i, (u i).toTopologicalSpace :=
TopologicalSpace.ext_nhds fun a ↦ by simp only [@nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (iInf u), nhds_iInf,
iInf_uniformity, @nhds_eq_comap_uniformity _ (u _), Filter.comap_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_sInf {s : Set (UniformSpace α)} :
(sInf s).toTopologicalSpace = ⨅ i ∈ s, @UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace α i := by
rw [sInf_eq_iInf]
simp only [← toTopologicalSpace_iInf]
theorem toTopologicalSpace_inf {u v : UniformSpace α} :
(u ⊓ v).toTopologicalSpace = u.toTopologicalSpace ⊓ v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
end UniformSpace
theorem UniformContinuous.continuous [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) : Continuous f :=
continuous_iff_le_induced.mpr <| UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace_mono <|
uniformContinuous_iff.1 hf
/-- Uniform space structure on `ULift α`. -/
instance ULift.uniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (ULift α) :=
UniformSpace.comap ULift.down ‹_›
/-- Uniform space structure on `αᵒᵈ`. -/
instance OrderDual.instUniformSpace [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (αᵒᵈ) :=
‹UniformSpace α›
section UniformContinuousInfi
-- TODO: add an `iff` lemma?
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(h₁ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂] f) (h₂ : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) :
UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ ⊓ u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf.mpr ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₁, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_left hf
theorem UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right {f : α → β} {u₁ u₂ : UniformSpace α} {u₃ : UniformSpace β}
(hf : UniformContinuous[u₂, u₃] f) : UniformContinuous[u₁ ⊓ u₂, u₃] f :=
tendsto_inf_right hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : Set (UniformSpace α)} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{u : UniformSpace α} (h₁ : u ∈ u₁) (hf : UniformContinuous[u, u₂] f) :
UniformContinuous[sInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' ⟨u, h₁⟩ hf
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : Set (UniformSpace β)} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, sInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ u ∈ u₂, UniformContinuous[u₁, u] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [sInf_eq_iInf', iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf, SetCoe.forall]
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_dom {f : α → β} {u₁ : ι → UniformSpace α} {u₂ : UniformSpace β}
{i : ι} (hf : UniformContinuous[u₁ i, u₂] f) : UniformContinuous[iInf u₁, u₂] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity]
exact tendsto_iInf' i hf
theorem uniformContinuous_iInf_rng {f : α → β} {u₁ : UniformSpace α} {u₂ : ι → UniformSpace β} :
UniformContinuous[u₁, iInf u₂] f ↔ ∀ i, UniformContinuous[u₁, u₂ i] f := by
delta UniformContinuous
rw [iInf_uniformity, tendsto_iInf]
end UniformContinuousInfi
/-- A uniform space with the discrete uniformity has the discrete topology. -/
theorem discreteTopology_of_discrete_uniformity [hα : UniformSpace α] (h : uniformity α = 𝓟 idRel) :
DiscreteTopology α :=
⟨(UniformSpace.ext h.symm : ⊥ = hα) ▸ rfl⟩
instance : UniformSpace Empty := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace PUnit := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace Bool := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℕ := ⊥
instance : UniformSpace ℤ := ⊥
section
variable [UniformSpace α]
open Additive Multiplicative
instance : UniformSpace (Additive α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
instance : UniformSpace (Multiplicative α) := ‹UniformSpace α›
theorem uniformContinuous_ofMul : UniformContinuous (ofMul : α → Additive α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toMul : UniformContinuous (toMul : Additive α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_ofAdd : UniformContinuous (ofAdd : α → Multiplicative α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformContinuous_toAdd : UniformContinuous (toAdd : Multiplicative α → α) :=
uniformContinuous_id
theorem uniformity_additive : 𝓤 (Additive α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofMul ofMul) := rfl
theorem uniformity_multiplicative : 𝓤 (Multiplicative α) = (𝓤 α).map (Prod.map ofAdd ofAdd) := rfl
end
instance instUniformSpaceSubtype {p : α → Prop} [t : UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace (Subtype p) :=
UniformSpace.comap Subtype.val t
theorem uniformity_subtype {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 (Subtype p) = comap (fun q : Subtype p × Subtype p => (q.1.1, q.2.1)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem uniformity_setCoe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 s = comap (Prod.map ((↑) : s → α) ((↑) : s → α)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
theorem map_uniformity_set_coe {s : Set α} [UniformSpace α] :
map (Prod.map (↑) (↑)) (𝓤 s) = 𝓤 α ⊓ 𝓟 (s ×ˢ s) := by
rw [uniformity_setCoe, map_comap, range_prodMap, Subtype.range_val]
theorem uniformContinuous_subtype_val {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] :
UniformContinuous (Subtype.val : { a : α // p a } → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
theorem UniformContinuous.subtype_mk {p : α → Prop} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : β → α}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (h : ∀ x, p (f x)) :
UniformContinuous (fun x => ⟨f x, h x⟩ : β → Subtype p) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' hf
theorem uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
UniformContinuousOn f s ↔ UniformContinuous (s.restrict f) := by
delta UniformContinuousOn UniformContinuous
rw [← map_uniformity_set_coe, tendsto_map'_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_of_uniformContinuous_subtype [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β}
{s : Set α} {a : α} (hf : UniformContinuous fun x : s => f x.val) (ha : s ∈ 𝓝 a) :
Tendsto f (𝓝 a) (𝓝 (f a)) := by
rw [(@map_nhds_subtype_coe_eq_nhds α _ s a (mem_of_mem_nhds ha) ha).symm]
exact tendsto_map' hf.continuous.continuousAt
theorem UniformContinuousOn.continuousOn [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] {f : α → β} {s : Set α}
(h : UniformContinuousOn f s) : ContinuousOn f s := by
rw [uniformContinuousOn_iff_restrict] at h
rw [continuousOn_iff_continuous_restrict]
exact h.continuous
@[to_additive]
instance [UniformSpace α] : UniformSpace αᵐᵒᵖ :=
UniformSpace.comap MulOpposite.unop ‹_›
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ = comap (fun q : αᵐᵒᵖ × αᵐᵒᵖ => (q.1.unop, q.2.unop)) (𝓤 α) :=
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem comap_uniformity_mulOpposite [UniformSpace α] :
comap (fun p : α × α => (MulOpposite.op p.1, MulOpposite.op p.2)) (𝓤 αᵐᵒᵖ) = 𝓤 α := by
simpa [uniformity_mulOpposite, comap_comap, (· ∘ ·)] using comap_id
namespace MulOpposite
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_unop [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (unop : αᵐᵒᵖ → α) :=
uniformContinuous_comap
@[to_additive]
theorem uniformContinuous_op [UniformSpace α] : UniformContinuous (op : α → αᵐᵒᵖ) :=
uniformContinuous_comap' uniformContinuous_id
end MulOpposite
section Prod
open UniformSpace
/- a similar product space is possible on the function space (uniformity of pointwise convergence),
but we want to have the uniformity of uniform convergence on function spaces -/
instance instUniformSpaceProd [u₁ : UniformSpace α] [u₂ : UniformSpace β] : UniformSpace (α × β) :=
u₁.comap Prod.fst ⊓ u₂.comap Prod.snd
-- check the above produces no diamond for `simp` and typeclass search
example [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
(instTopologicalSpaceProd : TopologicalSpace (α × β)) = UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace := by
with_reducible_and_instances rfl
theorem uniformity_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
((𝓤 α).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) ⊓
(𝓤 β).comap fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2) :=
rfl
instance [UniformSpace α] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)]
[UniformSpace β] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] : IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α × β)) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]
infer_instance
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) =
comap (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
simp_rw [uniformity_prod, prod_eq_inf, Filter.comap_inf, Filter.comap_comap, Function.comp_def]
theorem uniformity_prod_eq_prod [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
𝓤 (α × β) = map (fun p : (α × α) × β × β => ((p.1.1, p.2.1), (p.1.2, p.2.2))) (𝓤 α ×ˢ 𝓤 β) := by
rw [map_swap4_eq_comap, uniformity_prod_eq_comap_prod]
theorem mem_uniformity_of_uniformContinuous_invariant [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set (β × β)} {f : α → α → β} (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × α => f p.1 p.2)
(hs : s ∈ 𝓤 β) : ∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∀ a b c, (a, b) ∈ u → (f a c, f b c) ∈ s := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod_eq_prod, tendsto_map'_iff] at hf
rcases mem_prod_iff.1 (mem_map.1 <| hf hs) with ⟨u, hu, v, hv, huvt⟩
exact ⟨u, hu, fun a b c hab => @huvt ((_, _), (_, _)) ⟨hab, refl_mem_uniformity hv⟩⟩
/-- An entourage of the diagonal in `α` and an entourage in `β` yield an entourage in `α × β`
once we permute coordinates. -/
def entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) : Set ((α × β) × α × β) :=
{((a₁, b₁),(a₂, b₂)) | (a₁, a₂) ∈ u ∧ (b₁, b₂) ∈ v}
theorem mem_entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)} {p : (α × β) × α × β} :
p ∈ entourageProd u v ↔ (p.1.1, p.2.1) ∈ u ∧ (p.1.2, p.2.2) ∈ v := Iff.rfl
theorem entourageProd_mem_uniformity [t₁ : UniformSpace α] [t₂ : UniformSpace β] {u : Set (α × α)}
{v : Set (β × β)} (hu : u ∈ 𝓤 α) (hv : v ∈ 𝓤 β) :
entourageProd u v ∈ 𝓤 (α × β) := by
rw [uniformity_prod]; exact inter_mem_inf (preimage_mem_comap hu) (preimage_mem_comap hv)
theorem ball_entourageProd (u : Set (α × α)) (v : Set (β × β)) (x : α × β) :
ball x (entourageProd u v) = ball x.1 u ×ˢ ball x.2 v := by
ext p; simp only [ball, entourageProd, Set.mem_setOf_eq, Set.mem_prod, Set.mem_preimage]
lemma IsSymmetricRel.entourageProd {u : Set (α × α)} {v : Set (β × β)}
(hu : IsSymmetricRel u) (hv : IsSymmetricRel v) :
IsSymmetricRel (entourageProd u v) :=
Set.ext fun _ ↦ and_congr hu.mk_mem_comm hv.mk_mem_comm
theorem Filter.HasBasis.uniformity_prod {ιa ιb : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{pa : ιa → Prop} {pb : ιb → Prop} {sa : ιa → Set (α × α)} {sb : ιb → Set (β × β)}
(ha : (𝓤 α).HasBasis pa sa) (hb : (𝓤 β).HasBasis pb sb) :
(𝓤 (α × β)).HasBasis (fun i : ιa × ιb ↦ pa i.1 ∧ pb i.2)
(fun i ↦ entourageProd (sa i.1) (sb i.2)) :=
(ha.comap _).inf (hb.comap _)
theorem entourageProd_subset [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
{s : Set ((α × β) × α × β)} (h : s ∈ 𝓤 (α × β)) :
∃ u ∈ 𝓤 α, ∃ v ∈ 𝓤 β, entourageProd u v ⊆ s := by
rcases (((𝓤 α).basis_sets.uniformity_prod (𝓤 β).basis_sets).mem_iff' s).1 h with ⟨w, hw⟩
use w.1, hw.1.1, w.2, hw.1.2, hw.2
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.1, p.2.1)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 α) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_left) map_comap_le
theorem tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
Tendsto (fun p : (α × β) × α × β => (p.1.2, p.2.2)) (𝓤 (α × β)) (𝓤 β) :=
le_trans (map_mono inf_le_right) map_comap_le
theorem uniformContinuous_fst [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.1 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_fst
theorem uniformContinuous_snd [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] :
UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => p.2 :=
tendsto_prod_uniformity_snd
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ]
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk {f₁ : α → β} {f₂ : α → γ} (h₁ : UniformContinuous f₁)
(h₂ : UniformContinuous f₂) : UniformContinuous fun a => (f₁ a, f₂ a) := by
rw [UniformContinuous, uniformity_prod]
exact tendsto_inf.2 ⟨tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₁, tendsto_comap_iff.2 h₂⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk := UniformContinuous.prodMk
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_left {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (b) :
UniformContinuous fun a => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_id.prodMk uniformContinuous_const)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_left := UniformContinuous.prodMk_left
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMk_right {f : α × β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous f) (a) :
UniformContinuous fun b => f (a, b) :=
h.comp (uniformContinuous_const.prodMk uniformContinuous_id)
@[deprecated (since := "2025-03-10")]
alias UniformContinuous.prod_mk_right := UniformContinuous.prodMk_right
theorem UniformContinuous.prodMap [UniformSpace δ] {f : α → γ} {g : β → δ}
(hf : UniformContinuous f) (hg : UniformContinuous g) : UniformContinuous (Prod.map f g) :=
(hf.comp uniformContinuous_fst).prodMk (hg.comp uniformContinuous_snd)
theorem toTopologicalSpace_prod {α} {β} [u : UniformSpace α] [v : UniformSpace β] :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (α × β) instUniformSpaceProd =
@instTopologicalSpaceProd α β u.toTopologicalSpace v.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_left₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua1; haveI := ub1; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_left₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_left _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub1 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua1 ub1 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_inf_dom_right₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {ua1 ua2 : UniformSpace α}
{ub1 ub2 : UniformSpace β} {uc1 : UniformSpace γ}
(h : by haveI := ua2; haveI := ub2; exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := ua1 ⊓ ua2; haveI := ub1 ⊓ ub2
exact UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_inf_dom_right₂`
have ha := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ua1 ua2 ua2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have hb := @UniformContinuous.inf_dom_right _ _ id ub1 ub2 ub2 (@uniformContinuous_id _ (id _))
have h_unif_cont_id :=
@UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (ua1 ⊓ ua2) (ub1 ⊓ ub2) ua2 ub2 _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ h h_unif_cont_id
/-- A version of `uniformContinuous_sInf_dom` for binary functions -/
theorem uniformContinuous_sInf_dom₂ {α β γ} {f : α → β → γ} {uas : Set (UniformSpace α)}
{ubs : Set (UniformSpace β)} {ua : UniformSpace α} {ub : UniformSpace β} {uc : UniformSpace γ}
(ha : ua ∈ uas) (hb : ub ∈ ubs) (hf : UniformContinuous fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2) : by
haveI := sInf uas; haveI := sInf ubs
exact @UniformContinuous _ _ _ uc fun p : α × β => f p.1 p.2 := by
-- proof essentially copied from `continuous_sInf_dom`
let _ : UniformSpace (α × β) := instUniformSpaceProd
have ha := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom ha uniformContinuous_id
have hb := uniformContinuous_sInf_dom hb uniformContinuous_id
have h_unif_cont_id := @UniformContinuous.prodMap _ _ _ _ (sInf uas) (sInf ubs) ua ub _ _ ha hb
exact @UniformContinuous.comp _ _ _ (id _) (id _) _ _ _ hf h_unif_cont_id
end Prod
section
open UniformSpace Function
variable {δ' : Type*} [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β] [UniformSpace γ] [UniformSpace δ]
[UniformSpace δ']
local notation f " ∘₂ " g => Function.bicompr f g
/-- Uniform continuity for functions of two variables. -/
def UniformContinuous₂ (f : α → β → γ) :=
UniformContinuous (uncurry f)
theorem uniformContinuous₂_def (f : α → β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ f ↔ UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
Iff.rfl
theorem UniformContinuous₂.uniformContinuous {f : α → β → γ} (h : UniformContinuous₂ f) :
UniformContinuous (uncurry f) :=
h
theorem uniformContinuous₂_curry (f : α × β → γ) :
UniformContinuous₂ (Function.curry f) ↔ UniformContinuous f := by
rw [UniformContinuous₂, uncurry_curry]
theorem UniformContinuous₂.comp {f : α → β → γ} {g : γ → δ} (hg : UniformContinuous g)
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) : UniformContinuous₂ (g ∘₂ f) :=
hg.comp hf
theorem UniformContinuous₂.bicompl {f : α → β → γ} {ga : δ → α} {gb : δ' → β}
(hf : UniformContinuous₂ f) (hga : UniformContinuous ga) (hgb : UniformContinuous gb) :
UniformContinuous₂ (bicompl f ga gb) :=
hf.uniformContinuous.comp (hga.prodMap hgb)
end
theorem toTopologicalSpace_subtype [u : UniformSpace α] {p : α → Prop} :
@UniformSpace.toTopologicalSpace (Subtype p) instUniformSpaceSubtype =
@instTopologicalSpaceSubtype α p u.toTopologicalSpace :=
rfl
section Sum
variable [UniformSpace α] [UniformSpace β]
open Sum
-- Obsolete auxiliary definitions and lemmas
/-- Uniformity on a disjoint union. Entourages of the diagonal in the union are obtained
by taking independently an entourage of the diagonal in the first part, and an entourage of
the diagonal in the second part. -/
instance Sum.instUniformSpace : UniformSpace (α ⊕ β) where
uniformity := map (fun p : α × α => (inl p.1, inl p.2)) (𝓤 α) ⊔
map (fun p : β × β => (inr p.1, inr p.2)) (𝓤 β)
symm := fun _ hs ↦ ⟨symm_le_uniformity hs.1, symm_le_uniformity hs.2⟩
comp := fun s hs ↦ by
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.1 with ⟨tα, htα, Htα⟩
rcases comp_mem_uniformity_sets hs.2 with ⟨tβ, htβ, Htβ⟩
filter_upwards [mem_lift' (union_mem_sup (image_mem_map htα) (image_mem_map htβ))]
rintro ⟨_, _⟩ ⟨z, ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨a, b⟩, hab, ⟨⟩⟩, ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩ | ⟨⟨_, c⟩, hbc, ⟨⟩⟩⟩
exacts [@Htα (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩, @Htβ (_, _) ⟨b, hab, hbc⟩]
nhds_eq_comap_uniformity x := by
ext
cases x <;> simp [mem_comap', -mem_comap, nhds_inl, nhds_inr, nhds_eq_comap_uniformity,
Prod.ext_iff]
/-- The union of an entourage of the diagonal in each set of a disjoint union is again an entourage
of the diagonal. -/
theorem union_mem_uniformity_sum {a : Set (α × α)} (ha : a ∈ 𝓤 α) {b : Set (β × β)} (hb : b ∈ 𝓤 β) :
Prod.map inl inl '' a ∪ Prod.map inr inr '' b ∈ 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) :=
union_mem_sup (image_mem_map ha) (image_mem_map hb)
theorem Sum.uniformity : 𝓤 (α ⊕ β) = map (Prod.map inl inl) (𝓤 α) ⊔ map (Prod.map inr inr) (𝓤 β) :=
rfl
lemma uniformContinuous_inl : UniformContinuous (Sum.inl : α → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_left
lemma uniformContinuous_inr : UniformContinuous (Sum.inr : β → α ⊕ β) := le_sup_right
instance [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 α)] [IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 β)] :
IsCountablyGenerated (𝓤 (α ⊕ β)) := by
rw [Sum.uniformity]
infer_instance
end Sum
end Constructions
/-!
### Expressing continuity properties in uniform spaces
We reformulate the various continuity properties of functions taking values in a uniform space
in terms of the uniformity in the target. Since the same lemmas (essentially with the same names)
also exist for metric spaces and emetric spaces (reformulating things in terms of the distance or
the edistance in the target), we put them in a namespace `Uniform` here.
In the metric and emetric space setting, there are also similar lemmas where one assumes that
both the source and the target are metric spaces, reformulating things in terms of the distance
on both sides. These lemmas are generally written without primes, and the versions where only
the target is a metric space is primed. We follow the same convention here, thus giving lemmas
with primes.
-/
namespace Uniform
variable [UniformSpace α]
theorem tendsto_nhds_right {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (a, u x)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity, tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem tendsto_nhds_left {f : Filter β} {u : β → α} {a : α} :
Tendsto u f (𝓝 a) ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (u x, a)) f (𝓤 α) := by
rw [nhds_eq_comap_uniformity', tendsto_comap_iff]; rfl
theorem continuousAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousAt_iff_prod [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} :
ContinuousAt f b ↔ Tendsto (fun x : β × β => (f x.1, f x.2)) (𝓝 (b, b)) (𝓤 α) :=
⟨fun H => le_trans (H.prodMap' H) (nhds_le_uniformity _), fun H =>
continuousAt_iff'_left.2 <| H.comp <| tendsto_id.prodMk_nhds tendsto_const_nhds⟩
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_right]
theorem continuousWithinAt_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {b : β} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousWithinAt f s b ↔ Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
rw [ContinuousWithinAt, tendsto_nhds_left]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_right]
theorem continuousOn_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} {s : Set β} :
ContinuousOn f s ↔ ∀ b ∈ s, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝[s] b) (𝓤 α) := by
simp [ContinuousOn, continuousWithinAt_iff'_left]
theorem continuous_iff'_right [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f b, f x)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_right
theorem continuous_iff'_left [TopologicalSpace β] {f : β → α} :
Continuous f ↔ ∀ b, Tendsto (fun x => (f x, f b)) (𝓝 b) (𝓤 α) :=
continuous_iff_continuousAt.trans <| forall_congr' fun _ => tendsto_nhds_left
/-- Consider two functions `f` and `g` which coincide on a set `s` and are continuous there.
Then there is an open neighborhood of `s` on which `f` and `g` are uniformly close. -/
lemma exists_is_open_mem_uniformity_of_forall_mem_eq
[TopologicalSpace β] {r : Set (α × α)} {s : Set β}
{f g : β → α} (hf : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt f x) (hg : ∀ x ∈ s, ContinuousAt g x)
(hfg : s.EqOn f g) (hr : r ∈ 𝓤 α) :
∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ s ⊆ t ∧ ∀ x ∈ t, (f x, g x) ∈ r := by
have A : ∀ x ∈ s, ∃ t, IsOpen t ∧ x ∈ t ∧ ∀ z ∈ t, (f z, g z) ∈ r := by
intro x hx
obtain ⟨t, ht, htsymm, htr⟩ := comp_symm_mem_uniformity_sets hr
have A : {z | (f x, f z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hf x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (f x) ht)
have B : {z | (g x, g z) ∈ t} ∈ 𝓝 x := (hg x hx).preimage_mem_nhds (mem_nhds_left (g x) ht)
rcases _root_.mem_nhds_iff.1 (inter_mem A B) with ⟨u, hu, u_open, xu⟩
refine ⟨u, u_open, xu, fun y hy ↦ ?_⟩
have I1 : (f y, f x) ∈ t := (htsymm.mk_mem_comm).2 (hu hy).1
have I2 : (g x, g y) ∈ t := (hu hy).2
rw [hfg hx] at I1
exact htr (prodMk_mem_compRel I1 I2)
choose! t t_open xt ht using A
refine ⟨⋃ x ∈ s, t x, isOpen_biUnion t_open, fun x hx ↦ mem_biUnion hx (xt x hx), ?_⟩
rintro x hx
simp only [mem_iUnion, exists_prop] at hx
rcases hx with ⟨y, ys, hy⟩
exact ht y ys x hy
end Uniform
theorem Filter.Tendsto.congr_uniformity {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hf : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b)) (hg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.2 <| (Uniform.tendsto_nhds_right.1 hf).uniformity_trans hg
theorem Uniform.tendsto_congr {α β} [UniformSpace β] {f g : α → β} {l : Filter α} {b : β}
(hfg : Tendsto (fun x => (f x, g x)) l (𝓤 β)) : Tendsto f l (𝓝 b) ↔ Tendsto g l (𝓝 b) :=
⟨fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg, fun h => h.congr_uniformity hfg.uniformity_symm⟩
| Mathlib/Topology/UniformSpace/Basic.lean | 1,338 | 1,341 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Abhimanyu Pallavi Sudhir, Jean Lo, Calle Sönne, Sébastien Gouëzel,
Rémy Degenne, David Loeffler
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.SpecialFunctions.Pow.Real
/-!
# Power function on `ℝ≥0` and `ℝ≥0∞`
We construct the power functions `x ^ y` where
* `x` is a nonnegative real number and `y` is a real number;
* `x` is a number from `[0, +∞]` (a.k.a. `ℝ≥0∞`) and `y` is a real number.
We also prove basic properties of these functions.
-/
noncomputable section
open Real NNReal ENNReal ComplexConjugate Finset Function Set
namespace NNReal
variable {x : ℝ≥0} {w y z : ℝ}
/-- The nonnegative real power function `x^y`, defined for `x : ℝ≥0` and `y : ℝ` as the
restriction of the real power function. For `x > 0`, it is equal to `exp (y log x)`. For `x = 0`,
one sets `0 ^ 0 = 1` and `0 ^ y = 0` for `y ≠ 0`. -/
noncomputable def rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 :=
⟨(x : ℝ) ^ y, Real.rpow_nonneg x.2 y⟩
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0 ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : ((x ^ y : ℝ≥0) : ℝ) = (x : ℝ) ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_zero _
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ y ≠ 0 := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, ← NNReal.coe_eq_zero]
exact Real.rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_nonneg x.2
lemma rpow_eq_zero (hy : y ≠ 0) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by simp [hy]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow {x : ℝ} (h : x ≠ 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 0 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.zero_rpow h
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_one _
lemma rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_neg x.2 _
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n :=
NNReal.eq <| by simpa only [coe_rpow, coe_pow] using Real.rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0) ^ x = 1 :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.one_rpow _
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) _ _
theorem rpow_add' (h : y + z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_add' x.2 h
lemma rpow_add_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_intCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_sub_natCast (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast (mod_cast hx) _ _
lemma rpow_add_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y + n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + n) = x ^ y * x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_intCast' {n : ℤ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_intCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_sub_natCast' {n : ℕ} (h : y - n ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - n) = x ^ y / x ^ n := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_sub_natCast' (mod_cast x.2) h
lemma rpow_add_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
simpa using rpow_add_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_sub_one (hx : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
simpa using rpow_sub_natCast hx y 1
lemma rpow_add_one' (h : y + 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y + 1) = x ^ y * x := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_add' (h : 1 + y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 + y) = x * x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_add' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y z : ℝ} (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
ext; exact Real.rpow_add_of_nonneg x.2 hy hz
/-- Variant of `NNReal.rpow_add'` that avoids having to prove `y + z = w` twice. -/
lemma rpow_of_add_eq (x : ℝ≥0) (hw : w ≠ 0) (h : y + z = w) : x ^ w = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
rw [← h, rpow_add']; rwa [h]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_mul x.2 y z
lemma rpow_natCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_mul_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_natCast]
lemma rpow_intCast_mul (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℤ) (z : ℝ) : x ^ (n * z) = (x ^ n) ^ z := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
lemma rpow_mul_intCast (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (y * n) = (x ^ y) ^ n := by
rw [rpow_mul, rpow_intCast]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0} (hx : x ≠ 0) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub ((NNReal.coe_pos.trans pos_iff_ne_zero).mpr hx) y z
theorem rpow_sub' (h : y - z ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.rpow_sub' x.2 h
lemma rpow_sub_one' (h : y - 1 ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (y - 1) = x ^ y / x := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
lemma rpow_one_sub' (h : 1 - y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (1 - y) = x / x ^ y := by
rw [rpow_sub' h, rpow_one]
theorem rpow_inv_rpow_self {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ (1 / y) = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem rpow_self_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ (1 / y)) ^ y = x := by
field_simp [← rpow_mul]
theorem inv_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) : x⁻¹ ^ y = (x ^ y)⁻¹ :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.inv_rpow x.2 y
theorem div_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : (x / y) ^ z = x ^ z / y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.div_rpow x.2 y.2 z
theorem sqrt_eq_rpow (x : ℝ≥0) : sqrt x = x ^ (1 / (2 : ℝ)) := by
refine NNReal.eq ?_
push_cast
exact Real.sqrt_eq_rpow x.1
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n : ℕ) :=
rpow_natCast x n
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z :=
NNReal.eq <| Real.mul_rpow x.2 y.2
/-- `rpow` as a `MonoidHom` -/
@[simps]
def rpowMonoidHom (r : ℝ) : ℝ≥0 →* ℝ≥0 where
toFun := (· ^ r)
map_one' := one_rpow _
map_mul' _x _y := mul_rpow
/-- `rpow` variant of `List.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0` -/
theorem list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r :=
l.prod_hom (rpowMonoidHom r)
theorem list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← list_prod_map_rpow, List.map_map]; rfl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r :=
s.prod_hom' (rpowMonoidHom r) _
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow` for `ℝ≥0`. -/
lemma finset_prod_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
multiset_prod_map_rpow _ _ _
-- note: these don't really belong here, but they're much easier to prove in terms of the above
section Real
/-- `rpow` version of `List.prod_map_pow` for `Real`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l : List ℝ) (hl : ∀ x ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ x) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (· ^ r)).prod = l.prod ^ r := by
lift l to List ℝ≥0 using hl
have := congr_arg ((↑) : ℝ≥0 → ℝ) (NNReal.list_prod_map_rpow l r)
push_cast at this
rw [List.map_map] at this ⊢
exact mod_cast this
theorem _root_.Real.list_prod_map_rpow' {ι} (l : List ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hl : ∀ i ∈ l, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(l.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (l.map f).prod ^ r := by
rw [← Real.list_prod_map_rpow (l.map f) _ r, List.map_map]
· rfl
simpa using hl
/-- `rpow` version of `Multiset.prod_map_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow {ι} (s : Multiset ι) (f : ι → ℝ)
(hs : ∀ i ∈ s, (0 : ℝ) ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(s.map (f · ^ r)).prod = (s.map f).prod ^ r := by
induction' s using Quotient.inductionOn with l
simpa using Real.list_prod_map_rpow' l f hs r
/-- `rpow` version of `Finset.prod_pow`. -/
theorem _root_.Real.finset_prod_rpow
{ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ) (hs : ∀ i ∈ s, 0 ≤ f i) (r : ℝ) :
(∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r) = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r :=
Real.multiset_prod_map_rpow s.val f hs r
end Real
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x ≤ y) (h₂ : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h₁ : x < y) (h₂ : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow x.2 h₁ h₂
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ x < y :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ x ≤ y :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff x.2 y.2 hz
theorem le_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem rpow_inv_le_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_le_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz.ne']
theorem lt_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^z < y := by
simp only [← not_le, rpow_inv_le_iff hz]
theorem rpow_inv_lt_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z := by
simp only [← not_le, le_rpow_inv_iff hz]
section
variable {y : ℝ≥0}
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x < y) (hz : z < 0) : y ^ z < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_neg hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos (hx : 0 < x) (hxy : x ≤ y) (hz : z ≤ 0) : y ^ z ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_nonpos hx hxy hz
lemma rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < y ^ z ↔ y < x :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z ≤ y ^ z ↔ y ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z ≤ y :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ x ≤ y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z < y :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 < z) (x : ℝ≥0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ x < y ^ z :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_pos x.2 hy hz
lemma le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ≤ y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.le_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x < y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ y < x ^ z :=
Real.lt_rpow_inv_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ < y ↔ y ^ z < x :=
Real.rpow_inv_lt_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
lemma rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg (hx : 0 < x) (hy : 0 < y) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ ≤ y ↔ y ^ z ≤ x :=
Real.rpow_inv_le_iff_of_neg hx hy hz
end
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hyz : y < z) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_lt hx hyz
@[gcongr] theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hyz : y ≤ z) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_le hx hyz
theorem rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x < 1) (hyz : z < y) :
x ^ y < x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_lt_rpow_of_exponent_gt hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge {x : ℝ≥0} {y z : ℝ} (hx0 : 0 < x) (hx1 : x ≤ 1) (hyz : z ≤ y) :
x ^ y ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge hx0 hx1 hyz
theorem rpow_pos {p : ℝ} {x : ℝ≥0} (hx_pos : 0 < x) : 0 < x ^ p := by
have rpow_pos_of_nonneg : ∀ {p : ℝ}, 0 < p → 0 < x ^ p := by
intro p hp_pos
rw [← zero_rpow hp_pos.ne']
exact rpow_lt_rpow hx_pos hp_pos
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) p with (hp_pos | rfl | hp_neg)
· exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg hp_pos
· simp only [zero_lt_one, rpow_zero]
· rw [← neg_neg p, rpow_neg, inv_pos]
exact rpow_pos_of_nonneg (neg_pos.mpr hp_neg)
theorem rpow_lt_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : x < 1) (hz : 0 < z) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one (coe_nonneg x) hx1 hz
theorem rpow_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx2 : x ≤ 1) (hz : 0 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one x.2 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : z < 0) : x ^ z < 1 :=
Real.rpow_lt_one_of_one_lt_of_neg hx hz
theorem rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 ≤ x) (hz : z ≤ 0) : x ^ z ≤ 1 :=
Real.rpow_le_one_of_one_le_of_nonpos hx hz
theorem one_lt_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : 1 < x) (hz : 0 < z) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow hx hz
theorem one_le_rpow {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (h : 1 ≤ x) (h₁ : 0 ≤ z) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow h h₁
theorem one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x < 1)
(hz : z < 0) : 1 < x ^ z :=
Real.one_lt_rpow_of_pos_of_lt_one_of_neg hx1 hx2 hz
theorem one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx1 : 0 < x) (hx2 : x ≤ 1)
(hz : z ≤ 0) : 1 ≤ x ^ z :=
Real.one_le_rpow_of_pos_of_le_one_of_nonpos hx1 hx2 hz
theorem rpow_le_self_of_le_one {x : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hx : x ≤ 1) (h_one_le : 1 ≤ z) : x ^ z ≤ x := by
rcases eq_bot_or_bot_lt x with (rfl | (h : 0 < x))
· have : z ≠ 0 := by linarith
simp [this]
nth_rw 2 [← NNReal.rpow_one x]
exact NNReal.rpow_le_rpow_of_exponent_ge h hx h_one_le
theorem rpow_left_injective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Injective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y z hyz => by simpa only [rpow_inv_rpow_self hx] using congr_arg (fun y => y ^ (1 / x)) hyz
theorem rpow_eq_rpow_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z = y ^ z ↔ x = y :=
(rpow_left_injective hz).eq_iff
theorem rpow_left_surjective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Surjective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
fun y => ⟨y ^ x⁻¹, by simp_rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hx, rpow_one]⟩
theorem rpow_left_bijective {x : ℝ} (hx : x ≠ 0) : Function.Bijective fun y : ℝ≥0 => y ^ x :=
⟨rpow_left_injective hx, rpow_left_surjective hx⟩
theorem eq_rpow_inv_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x = y ^ z⁻¹ ↔ x ^ z = y := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
theorem rpow_inv_eq_iff {x y : ℝ≥0} {z : ℝ} (hz : z ≠ 0) : x ^ z⁻¹ = y ↔ x = y ^ z := by
rw [← rpow_eq_rpow_iff hz, ← one_div, rpow_self_rpow_inv hz]
@[simp] lemma rpow_rpow_inv {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y) ^ y⁻¹ = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, mul_inv_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
@[simp] lemma rpow_inv_rpow {y : ℝ} (hy : y ≠ 0) (x : ℝ≥0) : (x ^ y⁻¹) ^ y = x := by
rw [← rpow_mul, inv_mul_cancel₀ hy, rpow_one]
theorem pow_rpow_inv_natCast (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ n) ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ) = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, coe_rpow, NNReal.coe_pow]
exact Real.pow_rpow_inv_natCast x.2 hn
theorem rpow_inv_natCast_pow (x : ℝ≥0) {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : (x ^ (n⁻¹ : ℝ)) ^ n = x := by
rw [← NNReal.coe_inj, NNReal.coe_pow, coe_rpow]
exact Real.rpow_inv_natCast_pow x.2 hn
theorem _root_.Real.toNNReal_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) :
Real.toNNReal (x ^ y) = Real.toNNReal x ^ y := by
nth_rw 1 [← Real.coe_toNNReal x hx]
rw [← NNReal.coe_rpow, Real.toNNReal_coe]
theorem strictMono_rpow_of_pos {z : ℝ} (h : 0 < z) : StrictMono fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
fun x y hxy => by simp only [NNReal.rpow_lt_rpow hxy h, coe_lt_coe]
theorem monotone_rpow_of_nonneg {z : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ z) : Monotone fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ z :=
h.eq_or_lt.elim (fun h0 => h0 ▸ by simp only [rpow_zero, monotone_const]) fun h0 =>
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos h0).monotone
/-- Bundles `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ y` into an order isomorphism when `y : ℝ` is positive,
where the inverse is `fun x : ℝ≥0 => x ^ (1 / y)`. -/
@[simps! apply]
def orderIsoRpow (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) : ℝ≥0 ≃o ℝ≥0 :=
(strictMono_rpow_of_pos hy).orderIsoOfRightInverse (fun x => x ^ y) (fun x => x ^ (1 / y))
fun x => by
dsimp
rw [← rpow_mul, one_div_mul_cancel hy.ne.symm, rpow_one]
theorem orderIsoRpow_symm_eq (y : ℝ) (hy : 0 < y) :
(orderIsoRpow y hy).symm = orderIsoRpow (1 / y) (one_div_pos.2 hy) := by
simp only [orderIsoRpow, one_div_one_div]; rfl
theorem _root_.Real.nnnorm_rpow_of_nonneg {x y : ℝ} (hx : 0 ≤ x) : ‖x ^ y‖₊ = ‖x‖₊ ^ y := by
ext; exact Real.norm_rpow_of_nonneg hx
end NNReal
namespace ENNReal
/-- The real power function `x^y` on extended nonnegative reals, defined for `x : ℝ≥0∞` and
`y : ℝ` as the restriction of the real power function if `0 < x < ⊤`, and with the natural values
for `0` and `⊤` (i.e., `0 ^ x = 0` for `x > 0`, `1` for `x = 0` and `⊤` for `x < 0`, and
`⊤ ^ x = 1 / 0 ^ x`). -/
noncomputable def rpow : ℝ≥0∞ → ℝ → ℝ≥0∞
| some x, y => if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else (x ^ y : ℝ≥0)
| none, y => if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0
noncomputable instance : Pow ℝ≥0∞ ℝ :=
⟨rpow⟩
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_pow (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : rpow x y = x ^ y :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem rpow_zero {x : ℝ≥0∞} : x ^ (0 : ℝ) = 1 := by
cases x <;>
· dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [lt_irrefl]
theorem top_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then ⊤ else if y = 0 then 1 else 0 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by simp [top_rpow_def, h]
@[simp]
theorem top_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (⊤ : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
simp [top_rpow_def, asymm h, ne_of_lt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_pos {y : ℝ} (h : 0 < y) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = 0 := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, asymm h, ne_of_gt h]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_of_neg {y : ℝ} (h : y < 0) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = ⊤ := by
rw [← ENNReal.coe_zero, ← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), rpow, Pow.pow]
simp [h, ne_of_gt h]
theorem zero_rpow_def (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if 0 < y then 0 else if y = 0 then 1 else ⊤ := by
rcases lt_trichotomy (0 : ℝ) y with (H | rfl | H)
· simp [H, ne_of_gt, zero_rpow_of_pos, lt_irrefl]
· simp [lt_irrefl]
· simp [H, asymm H, ne_of_lt, zero_rpow_of_neg]
@[simp]
theorem zero_rpow_mul_self (y : ℝ) : (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y * (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = (0 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
rw [zero_rpow_def]
split_ifs
exacts [zero_mul _, one_mul _, top_mul_top]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_ne_zero {x : ℝ≥0} (h : x ≠ 0) (y : ℝ) : (↑(x ^ y) : ℝ≥0∞) = x ^ y := by
rw [← ENNReal.some_eq_coe]
dsimp only [(· ^ ·), Pow.pow, rpow]
simp [h]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_rpow_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0) {y : ℝ} (h : 0 ≤ y) : ↑(x ^ y) = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y := by
by_cases hx : x = 0
· rcases le_iff_eq_or_lt.1 h with (H | H)
· simp [hx, H.symm]
· simp [hx, zero_rpow_of_pos H, NNReal.zero_rpow (ne_of_gt H)]
· exact coe_rpow_of_ne_zero hx _
theorem coe_rpow_def (x : ℝ≥0) (y : ℝ) :
(x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ y = if x = 0 ∧ y < 0 then ⊤ else ↑(x ^ y) :=
rfl
theorem rpow_ofNNReal {M : ℝ≥0} {P : ℝ} (hP : 0 ≤ P) : (M : ℝ≥0∞) ^ P = ↑(M ^ P) := by
rw [ENNReal.coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ hP, ← ENNReal.rpow_eq_pow]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (1 : ℝ) = x := by
cases x
· exact dif_pos zero_lt_one
· change ite _ _ _ = _
simp only [NNReal.rpow_one, some_eq_coe, ite_eq_right_iff, top_ne_coe, and_imp]
exact fun _ => zero_le_one.not_lt
@[simp]
theorem one_rpow (x : ℝ) : (1 : ℝ≥0∞) ^ x = 1 := by
rw [← coe_one, ← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero one_ne_zero]
simp
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_zero_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 ∧ 0 < y ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y < 0 := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
lemma rpow_eq_zero_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = 0 ↔ x = 0 := by
simp [hy, hy.not_lt]
@[simp]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = 0 ∧ y < 0 ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ 0 < y := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [H, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, H, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, le_of_lt]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, h]
theorem rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y = ⊤ ↔ x = ⊤ := by
simp [rpow_eq_top_iff, hy, asymm hy]
lemma rpow_lt_top_iff_of_pos {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy : 0 < y) : x ^ y < ∞ ↔ x < ∞ := by
simp only [lt_top_iff_ne_top, Ne, rpow_eq_top_iff_of_pos hy]
theorem rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg (x : ℝ≥0∞) {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) : x ^ y = ⊤ → x = ⊤ := by
rw [ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_iff]
rintro (h|h)
· exfalso
rw [lt_iff_not_ge] at h
exact h.right hy0
· exact h.left
theorem rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y ≠ ⊤ :=
mt (ENNReal.rpow_eq_top_of_nonneg x hy0) h
theorem rpow_lt_top_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} {y : ℝ} (hy0 : 0 ≤ y) (h : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ y < ⊤ :=
lt_top_iff_ne_top.mpr (ENNReal.rpow_ne_top_of_nonneg hy0 h)
theorem rpow_add {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
cases x with
| top => exact (h'x rfl).elim
| coe x =>
have : x ≠ 0 := fun h => by simp [h] at hx
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero this, NNReal.rpow_add this]
theorem rpow_add_of_nonneg {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hy : 0 ≤ y) (hz : 0 ≤ z) :
x ^ (y + z) = x ^ y * x ^ z := by
induction x using recTopCoe
· rcases hy.eq_or_lt with rfl|hy
· rw [rpow_zero, one_mul, zero_add]
rcases hz.eq_or_lt with rfl|hz
· rw [rpow_zero, mul_one, add_zero]
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, hy, hz, add_pos hy hz]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg, hy, hz, add_nonneg hy hz, NNReal.rpow_add_of_nonneg _ hy hz]
theorem rpow_neg (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y : ℝ) : x ^ (-y) = (x ^ y)⁻¹ := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [top_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (H | H | H) <;>
simp [h, zero_rpow_of_pos, zero_rpow_of_neg, H, neg_pos.mpr]
· have A : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero h, ← coe_inv A, NNReal.rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_sub {x : ℝ≥0∞} (y z : ℝ) (hx : x ≠ 0) (h'x : x ≠ ⊤) : x ^ (y - z) = x ^ y / x ^ z := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, rpow_add _ _ hx h'x, rpow_neg, div_eq_mul_inv]
theorem rpow_neg_one (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (-1 : ℝ) = x⁻¹ := by simp [rpow_neg]
theorem rpow_mul (x : ℝ≥0∞) (y z : ℝ) : x ^ (y * z) = (x ^ y) ^ z := by
cases x with
| top =>
rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
| coe x =>
by_cases h : x = 0
· rcases lt_trichotomy y 0 with (Hy | Hy | Hy) <;>
rcases lt_trichotomy z 0 with (Hz | Hz | Hz) <;>
simp [h, Hy, Hz, zero_rpow_of_neg, zero_rpow_of_pos, top_rpow_of_neg, top_rpow_of_pos,
mul_pos_of_neg_of_neg, mul_neg_of_neg_of_pos, mul_neg_of_pos_of_neg]
· have : x ^ y ≠ 0 := by simp [h]
simp [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero, h, this, NNReal.rpow_mul]
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem rpow_natCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases x
· cases n <;> simp [top_rpow_of_pos (Nat.cast_add_one_pos _), top_pow (Nat.succ_ne_zero _)]
· simp [← coe_rpow_of_nonneg _ (Nat.cast_nonneg n)]
@[simp]
lemma rpow_ofNat (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℕ) [n.AtLeastTwo] :
x ^ (ofNat(n) : ℝ) = x ^ (OfNat.ofNat n) :=
rpow_natCast x n
@[simp, norm_cast]
lemma rpow_intCast (x : ℝ≥0∞) (n : ℤ) : x ^ (n : ℝ) = x ^ n := by
cases n <;> simp only [Int.ofNat_eq_coe, Int.cast_natCast, rpow_natCast, zpow_natCast,
Int.cast_negSucc, rpow_neg, zpow_negSucc]
theorem rpow_two (x : ℝ≥0∞) : x ^ (2 : ℝ) = x ^ 2 := rpow_ofNat x 2
theorem mul_rpow_eq_ite (x y : ℝ≥0∞) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = if (x = 0 ∧ y = ⊤ ∨ x = ⊤ ∧ y = 0) ∧ z < 0 then ⊤ else x ^ z * y ^ z := by
rcases eq_or_ne z 0 with (rfl | hz); · simp
replace hz := hz.lt_or_lt
wlog hxy : x ≤ y
· convert this y x z hz (le_of_not_le hxy) using 2 <;> simp only [mul_comm, and_comm, or_comm]
rcases eq_or_ne x 0 with (rfl | hx0)
· induction y <;> rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*, hz.not_lt]
rcases eq_or_ne y 0 with (rfl | hy0)
· exact (hx0 (bot_unique hxy)).elim
induction x
· rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [hz, top_unique hxy]
induction y
· rw [ne_eq, coe_eq_zero] at hx0
rcases hz with hz | hz <;> simp [*]
simp only [*, if_false]
norm_cast at *
rw [← coe_rpow_of_ne_zero (mul_ne_zero hx0 hy0), NNReal.mul_rpow]
norm_cast
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_top {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ ⊤) (hy : y ≠ ⊤) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
@[norm_cast]
theorem coe_mul_rpow (x y : ℝ≥0) (z : ℝ) : ((x : ℝ≥0∞) * y) ^ z = (x : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z * (y : ℝ≥0∞) ^ z :=
mul_rpow_of_ne_top coe_ne_top coe_ne_top z
theorem prod_coe_rpow {ι} (s : Finset ι) (f : ι → ℝ≥0) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, (f i : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r = ((∏ i ∈ s, f i : ℝ≥0) : ℝ≥0∞) ^ r := by
classical
induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| insert _ _ hi ih => simp_rw [prod_insert hi, ih, ← coe_mul_rpow, coe_mul]
theorem mul_rpow_of_ne_zero {x y : ℝ≥0∞} (hx : x ≠ 0) (hy : y ≠ 0) (z : ℝ) :
(x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by simp [*, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem mul_rpow_of_nonneg (x y : ℝ≥0∞) {z : ℝ} (hz : 0 ≤ z) : (x * y) ^ z = x ^ z * y ^ z := by
simp [hz.not_lt, mul_rpow_eq_ite]
theorem prod_rpow_of_ne_top {ι} {s : Finset ι} {f : ι → ℝ≥0∞} (hf : ∀ i ∈ s, f i ≠ ∞) (r : ℝ) :
∏ i ∈ s, f i ^ r = (∏ i ∈ s, f i) ^ r := by
classical
| induction s using Finset.induction with
| empty => simp
| Mathlib/Analysis/SpecialFunctions/Pow/NNReal.lean | 681 | 682 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Joseph Myers. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Joseph Myers
-/
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Angle.Oriented.RightAngle
import Mathlib.Geometry.Euclidean.Circumcenter
/-!
# Angles in circles and sphere.
This file proves results about angles in circles and spheres.
-/
noncomputable section
open Module Complex
open scoped EuclideanGeometry Real RealInnerProductSpace ComplexConjugate
namespace Orientation
variable {V : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V]
variable [Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] (o : Orientation ℝ V (Fin 2))
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form. -/
theorem oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
(hxy : ‖x‖ = ‖y‖) (hxz : ‖x‖ = ‖z‖) : o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) := by
have hy : y ≠ 0 := by
rintro rfl
rw [norm_zero, norm_eq_zero] at hxy
exact hxyne hxy
have hx : x ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxy.symm ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hy)
have hz : z ≠ 0 := norm_ne_zero_iff.1 (hxz ▸ norm_ne_zero_iff.2 hx)
calc
o.oangle y z = o.oangle x z - o.oangle x y := (o.oangle_sub_left hx hy hz).symm
_ = π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - z) x - (π - (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) x) := by
rw [o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxzne.symm hxz.symm,
o.oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne.symm hxy.symm]
_ = (2 : ℤ) • (o.oangle (x - y) x - o.oangle (x - z) x) := by abel
_ = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (x - y) (x - z) := by
rw [o.oangle_sub_right (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxyne) (sub_ne_zero_of_ne hxzne) hx]
_ = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) := by rw [← oangle_neg_neg, neg_sub, neg_sub]
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented vector angle
form with radius specified. -/
theorem oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real {x y z : V} (hxyne : x ≠ y) (hxzne : x ≠ z)
{r : ℝ} (hx : ‖x‖ = r) (hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
o.oangle y z = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x) (z - x) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq hxyne hxzne (hy.symm ▸ hx) (hz.symm ▸ hx)
/-- Oriented vector angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of
a cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same
result), represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_sub_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq {x₁ x₂ y z : V} (hx₁yne : x₁ ≠ y)
(hx₁zne : x₁ ≠ z) (hx₂yne : x₂ ≠ y) (hx₂zne : x₂ ≠ z) {r : ℝ} (hx₁ : ‖x₁‖ = r) (hx₂ : ‖x₂‖ = r)
(hy : ‖y‖ = r) (hz : ‖z‖ = r) :
(2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₁) (z - x₁) = (2 : ℤ) • o.oangle (y - x₂) (z - x₂) :=
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₁yne hx₁zne hx₁ hy hz ▸
o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real hx₂yne hx₂zne hx₂ hy hz
end Orientation
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
local notation "o" => Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
namespace Sphere
/-- Angle at center of a circle equals twice angle at circumference, oriented angle version. -/
theorem oangle_center_eq_two_zsmul_oangle {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
∡ p₁ s.center p₃ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ := by
rw [mem_sphere, @dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at hp₁ hp₂ hp₃
rw [oangle, oangle, o.oangle_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq_real _ _ hp₂ hp₁ hp₃] <;>
simp [hp₂p₁, hp₂p₃]
/-- Oriented angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a
cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same result),
represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_eq {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s)
(hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₄ : p₄ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₄ : p₂ ≠ p₄) (hp₃p₁ : p₃ ≠ p₁)
(hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄ := by
rw [mem_sphere, @dist_eq_norm_vsub V] at hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₄
rw [oangle, oangle, ← vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₁ p₂ s.center, ←
vsub_sub_vsub_cancel_right p₄ p₂ s.center,
o.two_zsmul_oangle_sub_eq_two_zsmul_oangle_sub_of_norm_eq _ _ _ _ hp₂ hp₃ hp₁ hp₄] <;>
simp [hp₂p₁, hp₂p₄, hp₃p₁, hp₃p₄]
end Sphere
/-- Oriented angle version of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a
cyclic quadrilateral add to π", for oriented angles mod π (for which those are the same result),
represented here as equality of twice the angles. -/
theorem Cospherical.two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : Cospherical ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P)) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₄ : p₂ ≠ p₄)
(hp₃p₁ : p₃ ≠ p₁) (hp₃p₄ : p₃ ≠ p₄) : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄ := by
obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := cospherical_iff_exists_sphere.1 h
simp_rw [Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff, Sphere.mem_coe] at hs
exact Sphere.two_zsmul_oangle_eq hs.1 hs.2.1 hs.2.2.1 hs.2.2.2 hp₂p₁ hp₂p₄ hp₃p₁ hp₃p₄
namespace Sphere
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
angle-at-point form where the apex is given as the center of a circle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_center_left {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) : ∡ p₁ s.center p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ s.center p₂ p₁ := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_of_dist_eq h.symm
(dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere' hp₂ hp₁)]
/-- The angle at the apex of an isosceles triangle is `π` minus twice a base angle, oriented
angle-at-point form where the apex is given as the center of a circle. -/
theorem oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_center_right {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) : ∡ p₁ s.center p₂ = π - (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₂ p₁ s.center := by
rw [oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_center_left hp₁ hp₂ h,
oangle_eq_oangle_of_dist_eq (dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere' hp₂ hp₁)]
/-- Twice a base angle of an isosceles triangle with apex at the center of a circle, plus twice
the angle at the apex of a triangle with the same base but apex on the circle, equals `π`. -/
theorem two_zsmul_oangle_center_add_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_pi {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₂p₁ : p₂ ≠ p₁) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃)
(hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃) : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₃ p₁ s.center + (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₃ = π := by
rw [← oangle_center_eq_two_zsmul_oangle hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₂p₁ hp₂p₃,
oangle_eq_pi_sub_two_zsmul_oangle_center_right hp₁ hp₃ hp₁p₃, add_sub_cancel]
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle with apex at the center of a circle is acute. -/
theorem abs_oangle_center_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : |(∡ s.center p₂ p₁).toReal| < π / 2 :=
abs_oangle_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
(dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere' hp₂ hp₁)
/-- A base angle of an isosceles triangle with apex at the center of a circle is acute. -/
theorem abs_oangle_center_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) : |(∡ p₂ p₁ s.center).toReal| < π / 2 :=
abs_oangle_left_toReal_lt_pi_div_two_of_dist_eq
(dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere' hp₂ hp₁)
/-- Given two points on a circle, the center of that circle may be expressed explicitly as a
multiple (by half the tangent of the angle between the chord and the radius at one of those
points) of a `π / 2` rotation of the vector between those points, plus the midpoint of those
points. -/
theorem tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_center {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P}
(hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
(Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₂ p₁ s.center) / 2) • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₂ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ
midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ = s.center := by
obtain ⟨r, hr⟩ := (dist_eq_iff_eq_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint h).1
(dist_center_eq_dist_center_of_mem_sphere hp₁ hp₂)
rw [← hr, ← oangle_midpoint_rev_left, oangle, vadd_vsub_assoc]
nth_rw 1 [show p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (2 : ℝ) • (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁) by simp]
rw [map_smul, smul_smul, add_comm, o.tan_oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two,
mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
simpa using h.symm
/-- Given three points on a circle, the center of that circle may be expressed explicitly as a
multiple (by half the inverse of the tangent of the angle at one of those points) of a `π / 2`
rotation of the vector between the other two points, plus the midpoint of those points. -/
theorem inv_tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_center {s : Sphere P}
{p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s) (hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃)
(hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
((Real.Angle.tan (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃))⁻¹ / 2) • o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (p₃ -ᵥ p₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ p₁ p₃ =
s.center := by
convert tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_center hp₁ hp₃ hp₁p₃
convert (Real.Angle.tan_eq_inv_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi _).symm
rw [add_comm,
two_zsmul_oangle_center_add_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_pi hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₁p₂.symm hp₂p₃ hp₁p₃]
/-- Given two points on a circle, the radius of that circle may be expressed explicitly as half
the distance between those two points divided by the cosine of the angle between the chord and
the radius at one of those points. -/
theorem dist_div_cos_oangle_center_div_two_eq_radius {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₂ / Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₁ s.center) / 2 = s.radius := by
rw [div_right_comm, div_eq_mul_inv _ (2 : ℝ), mul_comm,
show (2 : ℝ)⁻¹ * dist p₁ p₂ = dist p₁ (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂) by simp, ← mem_sphere.1 hp₁, ←
tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_center hp₁ hp₂ h, ←
oangle_midpoint_rev_left, oangle, vadd_vsub_assoc,
show p₂ -ᵥ p₁ = (2 : ℝ) • (midpoint ℝ p₁ p₂ -ᵥ p₁) by simp, map_smul, smul_smul,
div_mul_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ), @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V, @dist_eq_norm_vsub' V,
vadd_vsub_assoc, add_comm, o.oangle_add_right_smul_rotation_pi_div_two, Real.Angle.cos_coe,
Real.cos_arctan]
· norm_cast
rw [one_div, div_inv_eq_mul, ←
mul_self_inj (mul_nonneg (norm_nonneg _) (Real.sqrt_nonneg _)) (norm_nonneg _),
norm_add_sq_eq_norm_sq_add_norm_sq_real (o.inner_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_right _ _), ←
mul_assoc, mul_comm, mul_comm _ (√_), ← mul_assoc, ← mul_assoc,
Real.mul_self_sqrt (add_nonneg zero_le_one (sq_nonneg _)), norm_smul,
LinearIsometryEquiv.norm_map]
conv_rhs =>
rw [← mul_assoc, mul_comm _ ‖Real.Angle.tan _‖, ← mul_assoc, Real.norm_eq_abs,
abs_mul_abs_self]
ring
· simpa using h.symm
/-- Given two points on a circle, twice the radius of that circle may be expressed explicitly as
the distance between those two points divided by the cosine of the angle between the chord and
the radius at one of those points. -/
theorem dist_div_cos_oangle_center_eq_two_mul_radius {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (h : p₁ ≠ p₂) :
dist p₁ p₂ / Real.Angle.cos (∡ p₂ p₁ s.center) = 2 * s.radius := by
rw [← dist_div_cos_oangle_center_div_two_eq_radius hp₁ hp₂ h, mul_div_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
/-- Given three points on a circle, the radius of that circle may be expressed explicitly as half
the distance between two of those points divided by the absolute value of the sine of the angle
at the third point (a version of the law of sines or sine rule). -/
theorem dist_div_sin_oangle_div_two_eq_radius {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
dist p₁ p₃ / |Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃)| / 2 = s.radius := by
convert dist_div_cos_oangle_center_div_two_eq_radius hp₁ hp₃ hp₁p₃
rw [← Real.Angle.abs_cos_eq_abs_sin_of_two_zsmul_add_two_zsmul_eq_pi
(two_zsmul_oangle_center_add_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_pi hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₁p₂.symm hp₂p₃ hp₁p₃),
abs_of_nonneg (Real.Angle.cos_nonneg_iff_abs_toReal_le_pi_div_two.2 _)]
exact (abs_oangle_center_right_toReal_lt_pi_div_two hp₁ hp₃).le
/-- Given three points on a circle, twice the radius of that circle may be expressed explicitly as
the distance between two of those points divided by the absolute value of the sine of the angle
at the third point (a version of the law of sines or sine rule). -/
theorem dist_div_sin_oangle_eq_two_mul_radius {s : Sphere P} {p₁ p₂ p₃ : P} (hp₁ : p₁ ∈ s)
(hp₂ : p₂ ∈ s) (hp₃ : p₃ ∈ s) (hp₁p₂ : p₁ ≠ p₂) (hp₁p₃ : p₁ ≠ p₃) (hp₂p₃ : p₂ ≠ p₃) :
dist p₁ p₃ / |Real.Angle.sin (∡ p₁ p₂ p₃)| = 2 * s.radius := by
rw [← dist_div_sin_oangle_div_two_eq_radius hp₁ hp₂ hp₃ hp₁p₂ hp₁p₃ hp₂p₃,
mul_div_cancel₀ _ (two_ne_zero' ℝ)]
end Sphere
end EuclideanGeometry
namespace Affine
namespace Triangle
open EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
local notation "o" => Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- The circumcenter of a triangle may be expressed explicitly as a multiple (by half the inverse
of the tangent of the angle at one of the vertices) of a `π / 2` rotation of the vector between
the other two vertices, plus the midpoint of those vertices. -/
theorem inv_tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_circumcenter (t : Triangle ℝ P)
{i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) :
((Real.Angle.tan (∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃)))⁻¹ / 2) •
o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (t.points i₃ -ᵥ t.points i₁) +ᵥ
midpoint ℝ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₃) = t.circumcenter :=
Sphere.inv_tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_center (t.mem_circumsphere _)
(t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.independent.injective.ne h₁₂)
(t.independent.injective.ne h₁₃) (t.independent.injective.ne h₂₃)
/-- The circumradius of a triangle may be expressed explicitly as half the length of a side
divided by the absolute value of the sine of the angle at the third point (a version of the law
of sines or sine rule). -/
theorem dist_div_sin_oangle_div_two_eq_circumradius (t : Triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3}
(h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) : dist (t.points i₁) (t.points i₃) /
|Real.Angle.sin (∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃))| / 2 = t.circumradius :=
Sphere.dist_div_sin_oangle_div_two_eq_radius (t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.mem_circumsphere _)
(t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.independent.injective.ne h₁₂) (t.independent.injective.ne h₁₃)
(t.independent.injective.ne h₂₃)
/-- Twice the circumradius of a triangle may be expressed explicitly as the length of a side
divided by the absolute value of the sine of the angle at the third point (a version of the law
of sines or sine rule). -/
theorem dist_div_sin_oangle_eq_two_mul_circumradius (t : Triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3}
(h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) : dist (t.points i₁) (t.points i₃) /
|Real.Angle.sin (∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃))| = 2 * t.circumradius :=
Sphere.dist_div_sin_oangle_eq_two_mul_radius (t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.mem_circumsphere _)
(t.mem_circumsphere _) (t.independent.injective.ne h₁₂) (t.independent.injective.ne h₁₃)
(t.independent.injective.ne h₂₃)
/-- The circumsphere of a triangle may be expressed explicitly in terms of two points and the
angle at the third point. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_of_dist_of_oangle (t : Triangle ℝ P) {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂)
(h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃) : t.circumsphere =
⟨((Real.Angle.tan (∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃)))⁻¹ / 2) •
o.rotation (π / 2 : ℝ) (t.points i₃ -ᵥ t.points i₁) +ᵥ midpoint ℝ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₃),
dist (t.points i₁) (t.points i₃) /
|Real.Angle.sin (∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃))| / 2⟩ :=
t.circumsphere.ext
(t.inv_tan_div_two_smul_rotation_pi_div_two_vadd_midpoint_eq_circumcenter h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃).symm
(t.dist_div_sin_oangle_div_two_eq_circumradius h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃).symm
/-- If two triangles have two points the same, and twice the angle at the third point the same,
they have the same circumsphere. -/
theorem circumsphere_eq_circumsphere_of_eq_of_eq_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {t₁ t₂ : Triangle ℝ P}
{i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3} (h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃)
(h₁ : t₁.points i₁ = t₂.points i₁) (h₃ : t₁.points i₃ = t₂.points i₃)
(h₂ : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t₁.points i₁) (t₁.points i₂) (t₁.points i₃) =
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t₂.points i₁) (t₂.points i₂) (t₂.points i₃)) :
t₁.circumsphere = t₂.circumsphere := by
rw [t₁.circumsphere_eq_of_dist_of_oangle h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃,
t₂.circumsphere_eq_of_dist_of_oangle h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃,
-- Porting note: was `congrm ⟨((_ : ℝ)⁻¹ / 2) • _ +ᵥ _, _ / _ / 2⟩` and five more lines
Real.Angle.tan_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq h₂, Real.Angle.abs_sin_eq_of_two_zsmul_eq h₂, h₁, h₃]
/-- Given a triangle, and a fourth point such that twice the angle between two points of the
triangle at that fourth point equals twice the third angle of the triangle, the fourth point
lies in the circumsphere of the triangle. -/
theorem mem_circumsphere_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {t : Triangle ℝ P} {p : P} {i₁ i₂ i₃ : Fin 3}
(h₁₂ : i₁ ≠ i₂) (h₁₃ : i₁ ≠ i₃) (h₂₃ : i₂ ≠ i₃)
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t.points i₁) p (t.points i₃) =
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃)) : p ∈ t.circumsphere := by
let t'p : Fin 3 → P := Function.update t.points i₂ p
have h₁ : t'p i₁ = t.points i₁ := by simp [t'p, h₁₂]
have h₂ : t'p i₂ = p := by simp [t'p]
have h₃ : t'p i₃ = t.points i₃ := by simp [t'p, h₂₃.symm]
have ha : AffineIndependent ℝ t'p := by
rw [affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_of_ne h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃, h₁, h₂, h₃,
collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq h, ←
affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_of_ne h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃]
exact t.independent
let t' : Triangle ℝ P := ⟨t'p, ha⟩
have h₁' : t'.points i₁ = t.points i₁ := h₁
have h₂' : t'.points i₂ = p := h₂
have h₃' : t'.points i₃ = t.points i₃ := h₃
have h' : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t'.points i₁) (t'.points i₂) (t'.points i₃) =
(2 : ℤ) • ∡ (t.points i₁) (t.points i₂) (t.points i₃) := by rwa [h₁', h₂', h₃']
rw [← circumsphere_eq_circumsphere_of_eq_of_eq_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq h₁₂ h₁₃ h₂₃ h₁' h₃' h', ←
h₂']
exact Simplex.mem_circumsphere _ _
end Triangle
end Affine
namespace EuclideanGeometry
variable {V : Type*} {P : Type*} [NormedAddCommGroup V] [InnerProductSpace ℝ V] [MetricSpace P]
[NormedAddTorsor V P] [hd2 : Fact (finrank ℝ V = 2)] [Module.Oriented ℝ V (Fin 2)]
local notation "o" => Module.Oriented.positiveOrientation
/-- Converse of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral
add to π", for oriented angles mod π. -/
theorem cospherical_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄) (hn : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₄} : Set P)) :
Cospherical ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) := by
have hn' : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₃, p₄} : Set P) := by
rwa [← collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq h]
let t₁ : Affine.Triangle ℝ P := ⟨![p₁, p₂, p₄], affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set.2 hn⟩
let t₂ : Affine.Triangle ℝ P := ⟨![p₁, p₃, p₄], affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set.2 hn'⟩
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_sphere]
refine ⟨t₂.circumsphere, ?_⟩
simp_rw [Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
refine ⟨t₂.mem_circumsphere 0, ?_, t₂.mem_circumsphere 1, t₂.mem_circumsphere 2⟩
rw [Affine.Triangle.circumsphere_eq_circumsphere_of_eq_of_eq_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq
(by decide : (0 : Fin 3) ≠ 1) (by decide : (0 : Fin 3) ≠ 2) (by decide)
(show t₂.points 0 = t₁.points 0 from rfl) rfl h.symm]
exact t₁.mem_circumsphere 1
/-- Converse of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral
add to π", for oriented angles mod π, with a "concyclic" conclusion. -/
theorem concyclic_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_of_not_collinear {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄) (hn : ¬Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₄} : Set P)) :
Concyclic ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) :=
⟨cospherical_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_of_not_collinear h hn, coplanar_of_fact_finrank_eq_two _⟩
/-- Converse of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral
add to π", for oriented angles mod π, with a "cospherical or collinear" conclusion. -/
theorem cospherical_or_collinear_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄) :
Cospherical ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) ∨ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) := by
by_cases hc : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₄} : Set P)
· by_cases he : p₁ = p₄
· rw [he, Set.insert_eq_self.2
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _)))]
by_cases hl : Collinear ℝ ({p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P); · exact Or.inr hl
rw [or_iff_left hl]
let t : Affine.Triangle ℝ P := ⟨![p₂, p₃, p₄], affineIndependent_iff_not_collinear_set.2 hl⟩
rw [cospherical_iff_exists_sphere]
refine ⟨t.circumsphere, ?_⟩
simp_rw [Set.insert_subset_iff, Set.singleton_subset_iff]
exact ⟨t.mem_circumsphere 0, t.mem_circumsphere 1, t.mem_circumsphere 2⟩
have hc' : Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₃, p₄} : Set P) := by
rwa [← collinear_iff_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq h]
refine Or.inr ?_
rw [Set.insert_comm p₁ p₂] at hc
rwa [Set.insert_comm p₁ p₂, hc'.collinear_insert_iff_of_ne (Set.mem_insert _ _)
(Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_insert_of_mem _ (Set.mem_singleton _))) he]
· exact Or.inl (cospherical_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq_of_not_collinear h hc)
/-- Converse of "angles in same segment are equal" and "opposite angles of a cyclic quadrilateral
add to π", for oriented angles mod π, with a "concyclic or collinear" conclusion. -/
theorem concyclic_or_collinear_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq {p₁ p₂ p₃ p₄ : P}
(h : (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₂ p₄ = (2 : ℤ) • ∡ p₁ p₃ p₄) :
Concyclic ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) ∨ Collinear ℝ ({p₁, p₂, p₃, p₄} : Set P) := by
rcases cospherical_or_collinear_of_two_zsmul_oangle_eq h with (hc | hc)
· exact Or.inl ⟨hc, coplanar_of_fact_finrank_eq_two _⟩
· exact Or.inr hc
end EuclideanGeometry
| Mathlib/Geometry/Euclidean/Angle/Sphere.lean | 417 | 422 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Parikshit Khanna. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Parikshit Khanna, Jeremy Avigad, Leonardo de Moura, Floris van Doorn, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Option.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Defs
import Mathlib.Data.List.Monad
import Mathlib.Logic.OpClass
import Mathlib.Logic.Unique
import Mathlib.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Tactic.Common
/-!
# Basic properties of lists
-/
assert_not_exists GroupWithZero
assert_not_exists Lattice
assert_not_exists Prod.swap_eq_iff_eq_swap
assert_not_exists Ring
assert_not_exists Set.range
open Function
open Nat hiding one_pos
namespace List
universe u v w
variable {ι : Type*} {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {γ : Type w} {l₁ l₂ : List α}
/-- There is only one list of an empty type -/
instance uniqueOfIsEmpty [IsEmpty α] : Unique (List α) :=
{ instInhabitedList with
uniq := fun l =>
match l with
| [] => rfl
| a :: _ => isEmptyElim a }
instance : Std.LawfulIdentity (α := List α) Append.append [] where
left_id := nil_append
right_id := append_nil
instance : Std.Associative (α := List α) Append.append where
assoc := append_assoc
@[simp] theorem cons_injective {a : α} : Injective (cons a) := fun _ _ => tail_eq_of_cons_eq
theorem singleton_injective : Injective fun a : α => [a] := fun _ _ h => (cons_eq_cons.1 h).1
theorem set_of_mem_cons (l : List α) (a : α) : { x | x ∈ a :: l } = insert a { x | x ∈ l } :=
Set.ext fun _ => mem_cons
/-! ### mem -/
theorem _root_.Decidable.List.eq_or_ne_mem_of_mem [DecidableEq α]
{a b : α} {l : List α} (h : a ∈ b :: l) : a = b ∨ a ≠ b ∧ a ∈ l := by
by_cases hab : a = b
· exact Or.inl hab
· exact ((List.mem_cons.1 h).elim Or.inl (fun h => Or.inr ⟨hab, h⟩))
lemma mem_pair {a b c : α} : a ∈ [b, c] ↔ a = b ∨ a = c := by
rw [mem_cons, mem_singleton]
-- The simpNF linter says that the LHS can be simplified via `List.mem_map`.
-- However this is a higher priority lemma.
-- It seems the side condition `hf` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover/std4/issues/207
@[simp 1100, nolint simpNF]
theorem mem_map_of_injective {f : α → β} (H : Injective f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
f a ∈ map f l ↔ a ∈ l :=
⟨fun m => let ⟨_, m', e⟩ := exists_of_mem_map m; H e ▸ m', mem_map_of_mem⟩
@[simp]
theorem _root_.Function.Involutive.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff {f : α → α}
(hf : Function.Involutive f) (x : α) (l : List α) : (∃ y : α, y ∈ l ∧ f y = x) ↔ f x ∈ l :=
⟨by rintro ⟨y, h, rfl⟩; rwa [hf y], fun h => ⟨f x, h, hf _⟩⟩
theorem mem_map_of_involutive {f : α → α} (hf : Involutive f) {a : α} {l : List α} :
a ∈ map f l ↔ f a ∈ l := by rw [mem_map, hf.exists_mem_and_apply_eq_iff]
/-! ### length -/
alias ⟨_, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩ := length_pos_iff
theorem length_pos_iff_ne_nil {l : List α} : 0 < length l ↔ l ≠ [] :=
⟨ne_nil_of_length_pos, length_pos_of_ne_nil⟩
theorem exists_of_length_succ {n} : ∀ l : List α, l.length = n + 1 → ∃ h t, l = h :: t
| [], H => absurd H.symm <| succ_ne_zero n
| h :: t, _ => ⟨h, t, rfl⟩
@[simp] lemma length_injective_iff : Injective (List.length : List α → ℕ) ↔ Subsingleton α := by
constructor
· intro h; refine ⟨fun x y => ?_⟩; (suffices [x] = [y] by simpa using this); apply h; rfl
· intros hα l1 l2 hl
induction l1 generalizing l2 <;> cases l2
· rfl
· cases hl
· cases hl
· next ih _ _ =>
congr
· subsingleton
· apply ih; simpa using hl
@[simp default+1] -- Raise priority above `length_injective_iff`.
lemma length_injective [Subsingleton α] : Injective (length : List α → ℕ) :=
length_injective_iff.mpr inferInstance
theorem length_eq_two {l : List α} : l.length = 2 ↔ ∃ a b, l = [a, b] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b] := l; ⟨a, b, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
theorem length_eq_three {l : List α} : l.length = 3 ↔ ∃ a b c, l = [a, b, c] :=
⟨fun _ => let [a, b, c] := l; ⟨a, b, c, rfl⟩, fun ⟨_, _, _, e⟩ => e ▸ rfl⟩
/-! ### set-theoretic notation of lists -/
instance instSingletonList : Singleton α (List α) := ⟨fun x => [x]⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : Insert α (List α) := ⟨List.insert⟩
instance [DecidableEq α] : LawfulSingleton α (List α) :=
{ insert_empty_eq := fun x =>
show (if x ∈ ([] : List α) then [] else [x]) = [x] from if_neg not_mem_nil }
theorem singleton_eq (x : α) : ({x} : List α) = [x] :=
rfl
theorem insert_neg [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∉ l) :
Insert.insert x l = x :: l :=
insert_of_not_mem h
theorem insert_pos [DecidableEq α] {x : α} {l : List α} (h : x ∈ l) : Insert.insert x l = l :=
insert_of_mem h
theorem doubleton_eq [DecidableEq α] {x y : α} (h : x ≠ y) : ({x, y} : List α) = [x, y] := by
rw [insert_neg, singleton_eq]
rwa [singleton_eq, mem_singleton]
/-! ### bounded quantifiers over lists -/
theorem forall_mem_of_forall_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} (h : ∀ x ∈ a :: l, p x) :
∀ x ∈ l, p x := (forall_mem_cons.1 h).2
theorem exists_mem_cons_of {p : α → Prop} {a : α} (l : List α) (h : p a) : ∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
⟨a, mem_cons_self, h⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_of_exists {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ l, p x) →
∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xl, px⟩ => ⟨x, mem_cons_of_mem _ xl, px⟩
theorem or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons {p : α → Prop} {a : α} {l : List α} : (∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) →
p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
fun ⟨x, xal, px⟩ =>
Or.elim (eq_or_mem_of_mem_cons xal) (fun h : x = a => by rw [← h]; left; exact px)
fun h : x ∈ l => Or.inr ⟨x, h, px⟩
theorem exists_mem_cons_iff (p : α → Prop) (a : α) (l : List α) :
(∃ x ∈ a :: l, p x) ↔ p a ∨ ∃ x ∈ l, p x :=
Iff.intro or_exists_of_exists_mem_cons fun h =>
Or.elim h (exists_mem_cons_of l) exists_mem_cons_of_exists
/-! ### list subset -/
theorem cons_subset_of_subset_of_mem {a : α} {l m : List α}
(ainm : a ∈ m) (lsubm : l ⊆ m) : a::l ⊆ m :=
cons_subset.2 ⟨ainm, lsubm⟩
theorem append_subset_of_subset_of_subset {l₁ l₂ l : List α} (l₁subl : l₁ ⊆ l) (l₂subl : l₂ ⊆ l) :
l₁ ++ l₂ ⊆ l :=
fun _ h ↦ (mem_append.1 h).elim (@l₁subl _) (@l₂subl _)
theorem map_subset_iff {l₁ l₂ : List α} (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) :
map f l₁ ⊆ map f l₂ ↔ l₁ ⊆ l₂ := by
refine ⟨?_, map_subset f⟩; intro h2 x hx
rcases mem_map.1 (h2 (mem_map_of_mem hx)) with ⟨x', hx', hxx'⟩
cases h hxx'; exact hx'
/-! ### append -/
theorem append_eq_has_append {L₁ L₂ : List α} : List.append L₁ L₂ = L₁ ++ L₂ :=
rfl
theorem append_right_injective (s : List α) : Injective fun t ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_left
theorem append_left_injective (t : List α) : Injective fun s ↦ s ++ t :=
fun _ _ ↦ append_cancel_right
/-! ### replicate -/
theorem eq_replicate_length {a : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, l = replicate l.length a ↔ ∀ b ∈ l, b = a
| [] => by simp
| (b :: l) => by simp [eq_replicate_length, replicate_succ]
theorem replicate_add (m n) (a : α) : replicate (m + n) a = replicate m a ++ replicate n a := by
rw [replicate_append_replicate]
theorem replicate_subset_singleton (n) (a : α) : replicate n a ⊆ [a] := fun _ h =>
mem_singleton.2 (eq_of_mem_replicate h)
theorem subset_singleton_iff {a : α} {L : List α} : L ⊆ [a] ↔ ∃ n, L = replicate n a := by
simp only [eq_replicate_iff, subset_def, mem_singleton, exists_eq_left']
theorem replicate_right_injective {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : Injective (@replicate α n) :=
fun _ _ h => (eq_replicate_iff.1 h).2 _ <| mem_replicate.2 ⟨hn, rfl⟩
theorem replicate_right_inj {a b : α} {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) :
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ a = b :=
(replicate_right_injective hn).eq_iff
theorem replicate_right_inj' {a b : α} : ∀ {n},
replicate n a = replicate n b ↔ n = 0 ∨ a = b
| 0 => by simp
| n + 1 => (replicate_right_inj n.succ_ne_zero).trans <| by simp only [n.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
theorem replicate_left_injective (a : α) : Injective (replicate · a) :=
LeftInverse.injective (length_replicate (n := ·))
theorem replicate_left_inj {a : α} {n m : ℕ} : replicate n a = replicate m a ↔ n = m :=
(replicate_left_injective a).eq_iff
@[simp]
theorem head?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.head? = l.head? := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := Nat.exists_eq_succ_of_ne_zero h
induction l <;> simp [replicate]
@[simp]
theorem getLast?_flatten_replicate {n : ℕ} (h : n ≠ 0) (l : List α) :
(List.replicate n l).flatten.getLast? = l.getLast? := by
rw [← List.head?_reverse, ← List.head?_reverse, List.reverse_flatten, List.map_replicate,
List.reverse_replicate, head?_flatten_replicate h]
/-! ### pure -/
theorem mem_pure (x y : α) : x ∈ (pure y : List α) ↔ x = y := by simp
/-! ### bind -/
@[simp]
theorem bind_eq_flatMap {α β} (f : α → List β) (l : List α) : l >>= f = l.flatMap f :=
rfl
/-! ### concat -/
/-! ### reverse -/
theorem reverse_cons' (a : α) (l : List α) : reverse (a :: l) = concat (reverse l) a := by
simp only [reverse_cons, concat_eq_append]
theorem reverse_concat' (l : List α) (a : α) : (l ++ [a]).reverse = a :: l.reverse := by
rw [reverse_append]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_singleton (a : α) : reverse [a] = [a] :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem reverse_involutive : Involutive (@reverse α) :=
reverse_reverse
@[simp]
theorem reverse_injective : Injective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.injective
theorem reverse_surjective : Surjective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.surjective
theorem reverse_bijective : Bijective (@reverse α) :=
reverse_involutive.bijective
theorem concat_eq_reverse_cons (a : α) (l : List α) : concat l a = reverse (a :: reverse l) := by
simp only [concat_eq_append, reverse_cons, reverse_reverse]
theorem map_reverseAux (f : α → β) (l₁ l₂ : List α) :
map f (reverseAux l₁ l₂) = reverseAux (map f l₁) (map f l₂) := by
simp only [reverseAux_eq, map_append, map_reverse]
-- TODO: Rename `List.reverse_perm` to `List.reverse_perm_self`
@[simp] lemma reverse_perm' : l₁.reverse ~ l₂ ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp := l₁.reverse_perm.symm.trans
mpr := l₁.reverse_perm.trans
@[simp] lemma perm_reverse : l₁ ~ l₂.reverse ↔ l₁ ~ l₂ where
mp hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm
mpr hl := hl.trans l₂.reverse_perm.symm
/-! ### getLast -/
attribute [simp] getLast_cons
theorem getLast_append_singleton {a : α} (l : List α) :
getLast (l ++ [a]) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l (cons_ne_nil a _)) = a := by
simp [getLast_append]
theorem getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil (l₁ l₂ : List α) (h : l₂ ≠ []) :
getLast (l₁ ++ l₂) (append_ne_nil_of_right_ne_nil l₁ h) = getLast l₂ h := by
induction l₁ with
| nil => simp
| cons _ _ ih => simp only [cons_append]; rw [List.getLast_cons]; exact ih
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-06")]
alias getLast_append' := getLast_append_of_right_ne_nil
theorem getLast_concat' {a : α} (l : List α) : getLast (concat l a) (by simp) = a := by
simp
@[simp]
theorem getLast_singleton' (a : α) : getLast [a] (cons_ne_nil a []) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem getLast_cons_cons (a₁ a₂ : α) (l : List α) :
getLast (a₁ :: a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _) = getLast (a₂ :: l) (cons_ne_nil a₂ l) :=
rfl
theorem dropLast_append_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), dropLast l ++ [getLast l h] = l
| [], h => absurd rfl h
| [_], _ => rfl
| a :: b :: l, h => by
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, getLast_cons (cons_ne_nil _ _)]
congr
exact dropLast_append_getLast (cons_ne_nil b l)
theorem getLast_congr {l₁ l₂ : List α} (h₁ : l₁ ≠ []) (h₂ : l₂ ≠ []) (h₃ : l₁ = l₂) :
getLast l₁ h₁ = getLast l₂ h₂ := by subst l₁; rfl
theorem getLast_replicate_succ (m : ℕ) (a : α) :
(replicate (m + 1) a).getLast (ne_nil_of_length_eq_add_one length_replicate) = a := by
simp only [replicate_succ']
exact getLast_append_singleton _
@[deprecated (since := "2025-02-07")]
alias getLast_filter' := getLast_filter_of_pos
/-! ### getLast? -/
theorem mem_getLast?_eq_getLast : ∀ {l : List α} {x : α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → ∃ h, x = getLast l h
| [], x, hx => False.elim <| by simp at hx
| [a], x, hx =>
have : a = x := by simpa using hx
this ▸ ⟨cons_ne_nil a [], rfl⟩
| a :: b :: l, x, hx => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hx
rcases mem_getLast?_eq_getLast hx with ⟨_, h₂⟩
use cons_ne_nil _ _
assumption
theorem getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil : ∀ {l : List α} (h : l ≠ []), l.getLast? = some (l.getLast h)
| [], h => (h rfl).elim
| [_], _ => rfl
| _ :: b :: l, _ => @getLast?_eq_getLast_of_ne_nil (b :: l) (cons_ne_nil _ _)
theorem mem_getLast?_cons {x y : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.getLast? → x ∈ (y :: l).getLast?
| [], _ => by contradiction
| _ :: _, h => h
theorem dropLast_append_getLast? : ∀ {l : List α}, ∀ a ∈ l.getLast?, dropLast l ++ [a] = l
| [], a, ha => (Option.not_mem_none a ha).elim
| [a], _, rfl => rfl
| a :: b :: l, c, hc => by
rw [getLast?_cons_cons] at hc
rw [dropLast_cons₂, cons_append, dropLast_append_getLast? _ hc]
theorem getLastI_eq_getLast? [Inhabited α] : ∀ l : List α, l.getLastI = l.getLast?.iget
| [] => by simp [getLastI, Inhabited.default]
| [_] => rfl
| [_, _] => rfl
| [_, _, _] => rfl
| _ :: _ :: c :: l => by simp [getLastI, getLastI_eq_getLast? (c :: l)]
theorem getLast?_append_cons :
∀ (l₁ : List α) (a : α) (l₂ : List α), getLast? (l₁ ++ a :: l₂) = getLast? (a :: l₂)
| [], _, _ => rfl
| [_], _, _ => rfl
| b :: c :: l₁, a, l₂ => by rw [cons_append, cons_append, getLast?_cons_cons,
← cons_append, getLast?_append_cons (c :: l₁)]
theorem getLast?_append_of_ne_nil (l₁ : List α) :
∀ {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₂ ≠ []), getLast? (l₁ ++ l₂) = getLast? l₂
| [], hl₂ => by contradiction
| b :: l₂, _ => getLast?_append_cons l₁ b l₂
theorem mem_getLast?_append_of_mem_getLast? {l₁ l₂ : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ l₂.getLast?) :
x ∈ (l₁ ++ l₂).getLast? := by
cases l₂
· contradiction
· rw [List.getLast?_append_cons]
exact h
/-! ### head(!?) and tail -/
@[simp]
theorem head!_nil [Inhabited α] : ([] : List α).head! = default := rfl
@[simp] theorem head_cons_tail (x : List α) (h : x ≠ []) : x.head h :: x.tail = x := by
cases x <;> simp at h ⊢
theorem head_eq_getElem_zero {l : List α} (hl : l ≠ []) :
l.head hl = l[0]'(length_pos_iff.2 hl) :=
(getElem_zero _).symm
theorem head!_eq_head? [Inhabited α] (l : List α) : head! l = (head? l).iget := by cases l <;> rfl
theorem surjective_head! [Inhabited α] : Surjective (@head! α _) := fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩
theorem surjective_head? : Surjective (@head? α) :=
Option.forall.2 ⟨⟨[], rfl⟩, fun x => ⟨[x], rfl⟩⟩
theorem surjective_tail : Surjective (@tail α)
| [] => ⟨[], rfl⟩
| a :: l => ⟨a :: a :: l, rfl⟩
theorem eq_cons_of_mem_head? {x : α} : ∀ {l : List α}, x ∈ l.head? → l = x :: tail l
| [], h => (Option.not_mem_none _ h).elim
| a :: l, h => by
simp only [head?, Option.mem_def, Option.some_inj] at h
exact h ▸ rfl
@[simp] theorem head!_cons [Inhabited α] (a : α) (l : List α) : head! (a :: l) = a := rfl
@[simp]
theorem head!_append [Inhabited α] (t : List α) {s : List α} (h : s ≠ []) :
head! (s ++ t) = head! s := by
induction s
· contradiction
· rfl
theorem mem_head?_append_of_mem_head? {s t : List α} {x : α} (h : x ∈ s.head?) :
x ∈ (s ++ t).head? := by
cases s
· contradiction
· exact h
theorem head?_append_of_ne_nil :
∀ (l₁ : List α) {l₂ : List α} (_ : l₁ ≠ []), head? (l₁ ++ l₂) = head? l₁
| _ :: _, _, _ => rfl
theorem tail_append_singleton_of_ne_nil {a : α} {l : List α} (h : l ≠ nil) :
| tail (l ++ [a]) = tail l ++ [a] := by
induction l
| Mathlib/Data/List/Basic.lean | 445 | 446 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2024 Yury Kudryashov. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yury Kudryashov
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Int
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Order.Interval.Set.OrdConnected
import Mathlib.Order.Nat
import Mathlib.Order.UpperLower.Basic
/-!
# Images of intervals under `Nat.cast : ℕ → ℤ`
In this file we prove that the image of each `Set.Ixx` interval under `Nat.cast : ℕ → ℤ`
is the corresponding interval in `ℤ`.
-/
open Set
namespace Nat
@[simp]
theorem range_cast_int : range ((↑) : ℕ → ℤ) = Ici 0 :=
Subset.antisymm (range_subset_iff.2 Int.ofNat_nonneg) CanLift.prf
theorem image_cast_int_Icc (a b : ℕ) : (↑) '' Icc a b = Icc (a : ℤ) b :=
(castOrderEmbedding (α := ℤ)).image_Icc (by simp [ordConnected_Ici]) a b
theorem image_cast_int_Ico (a b : ℕ) : (↑) '' Ico a b = Ico (a : ℤ) b :=
| (castOrderEmbedding (α := ℤ)).image_Ico (by simp [ordConnected_Ici]) a b
| Mathlib/Data/Nat/Cast/SetInterval.lean | 31 | 32 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Reid Barton. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Reid Barton, Kim Morrison
-/
import Mathlib.CategoryTheory.Opposites
/-!
# Morphisms from equations between objects.
When working categorically, sometimes one encounters an equation `h : X = Y` between objects.
Your initial aversion to this is natural and appropriate:
you're in for some trouble, and if there is another way to approach the problem that won't
rely on this equality, it may be worth pursuing.
You have two options:
1. Use the equality `h` as one normally would in Lean (e.g. using `rw` and `subst`).
This may immediately cause difficulties, because in category theory everything is dependently
typed, and equations between objects quickly lead to nasty goals with `eq.rec`.
2. Promote `h` to a morphism using `eqToHom h : X ⟶ Y`, or `eqToIso h : X ≅ Y`.
This file introduces various `simp` lemmas which in favourable circumstances
result in the various `eqToHom` morphisms to drop out at the appropriate moment!
-/
universe v₁ v₂ v₃ u₁ u₂ u₃
-- morphism levels before object levels. See note [CategoryTheory universes].
namespace CategoryTheory
open Opposite
variable {C : Type u₁} [Category.{v₁} C]
/-- An equality `X = Y` gives us a morphism `X ⟶ Y`.
It is typically better to use this, rather than rewriting by the equality then using `𝟙 _`
which usually leads to dependent type theory hell.
-/
def eqToHom {X Y : C} (p : X = Y) : X ⟶ Y := by rw [p]; exact 𝟙 _
@[simp]
theorem eqToHom_refl (X : C) (p : X = X) : eqToHom p = 𝟙 X :=
rfl
@[reassoc (attr := simp)]
theorem eqToHom_trans {X Y Z : C} (p : X = Y) (q : Y = Z) :
eqToHom p ≫ eqToHom q = eqToHom (p.trans q) := by
cases p
cases q
simp
/-- `eqToHom h` is heterogeneously equal to the identity of its domain. -/
lemma eqToHom_heq_id_dom (X Y : C) (h : X = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h) (𝟙 X) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- `eqToHom h` is heterogeneously equal to the identity of its codomain. -/
lemma eqToHom_heq_id_cod (X Y : C) (h : X = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h) (𝟙 Y) := by
subst h; rfl
/-- Two morphisms are conjugate via eqToHom if and only if they are heterogeneously equal.
Note this used to be in the Functor namespace, where it doesn't belong. -/
theorem conj_eqToHom_iff_heq {W X Y Z : C} (f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W = Y) (h' : X = Z) :
f = eqToHom h ≫ g ≫ eqToHom h'.symm ↔ HEq f g := by
cases h
cases h'
simp
theorem conj_eqToHom_iff_heq' {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z : C}
(f : W ⟶ X) (g : Y ⟶ Z) (h : W = Y) (h' : Z = X) :
f = eqToHom h ≫ g ≫ eqToHom h' ↔ HEq f g := conj_eqToHom_iff_heq _ _ _ h'.symm
theorem comp_eqToHom_iff {X Y Y' : C} (p : Y = Y') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X ⟶ Y') :
f ≫ eqToHom p = g ↔ f = g ≫ eqToHom p.symm :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => by simp [eq_whisker h (eqToHom p)] }
theorem eqToHom_comp_iff {X X' Y : C} (p : X = X') (f : X ⟶ Y) (g : X' ⟶ Y) :
eqToHom p ≫ g = f ↔ g = eqToHom p.symm ≫ f :=
{ mp := fun h => h ▸ by simp
mpr := fun h => h ▸ by simp [whisker_eq _ h] }
theorem eqToHom_comp_heq {C} [Category C] {W X Y : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (h : W = Y) : HEq (eqToHom h ≫ f) f := by
rw [← conj_eqToHom_iff_heq _ _ h rfl, eqToHom_refl, Category.comp_id]
@[simp] theorem eqToHom_comp_heq_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : W = Y) :
HEq (eqToHom h ≫ f) g ↔ HEq f g :=
⟨(eqToHom_comp_heq ..).symm.trans, (eqToHom_comp_heq ..).trans⟩
@[simp] theorem heq_eqToHom_comp_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : Y ⟶ X) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : W = Y) :
HEq g (eqToHom h ≫ f) ↔ HEq g f :=
⟨(·.trans (eqToHom_comp_heq ..)), (·.trans (eqToHom_comp_heq ..).symm)⟩
theorem comp_eqToHom_heq {C} [Category C] {X Y Z : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (h : Y = Z) : HEq (f ≫ eqToHom h) f := by
rw [← conj_eqToHom_iff_heq' _ _ rfl h, eqToHom_refl, Category.id_comp]
@[simp] theorem comp_eqToHom_heq_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : Y = W) :
HEq (f ≫ eqToHom h) g ↔ HEq f g :=
⟨(comp_eqToHom_heq ..).symm.trans, (comp_eqToHom_heq ..).trans⟩
@[simp] theorem heq_comp_eqToHom_iff {C} [Category C] {W X Y Z Z' : C}
(f : X ⟶ Y) (g : Z ⟶ Z') (h : Y = W) :
HEq g (f ≫ eqToHom h) ↔ HEq g f :=
⟨(·.trans (comp_eqToHom_heq ..)), (·.trans (comp_eqToHom_heq ..).symm)⟩
theorem heq_comp {C} [Category C] {X Y Z X' Y' Z' : C}
{f : X ⟶ Y} {g : Y ⟶ Z} {f' : X' ⟶ Y'} {g' : Y' ⟶ Z'}
(eq1 : X = X') (eq2 : Y = Y') (eq3 : Z = Z')
(H1 : HEq f f') (H2 : HEq g g') :
HEq (f ≫ g) (f' ≫ g') := by
cases eq1; cases eq2; cases eq3; cases H1; cases H2; rfl
variable {β : Sort*}
/-- We can push `eqToHom` to the left through families of morphisms. -/
-- The simpNF linter incorrectly claims that this will never apply.
-- It seems the side condition `w` is not applied by `simpNF`.
-- https://github.com/leanprover-community/mathlib4/issues/5049
@[reassoc (attr := simp, nolint simpNF)]
| theorem eqToHom_naturality {f g : β → C} (z : ∀ b, f b ⟶ g b) {j j' : β} (w : j = j') :
z j ≫ eqToHom (by simp [w]) = eqToHom (by simp [w]) ≫ z j' := by
cases w
simp
| Mathlib/CategoryTheory/EqToHom.lean | 126 | 129 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2020 Frédéric Dupuis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Frédéric Dupuis, Eric Wieser
-/
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.TensorProduct
import Mathlib.Tactic.AdaptationNote
import Mathlib.LinearAlgebra.Multilinear.Curry
/-!
# Tensor product of an indexed family of modules over commutative semirings
We define the tensor product of an indexed family `s : ι → Type*` of modules over commutative
semirings. We denote this space by `⨂[R] i, s i` and define it as `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`
quotiented by the appropriate equivalence relation. The treatment follows very closely that of the
binary tensor product in `LinearAlgebra/TensorProduct.lean`.
## Main definitions
* `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor product
of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `tprod R f` with `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i` over all `i : ι`.
This is bundled as a multilinear map from `Π i, s i` to `⨂[R] i, s i`.
* `liftAddHom` constructs an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a
function `φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties.
* `lift φ` with `φ : MultilinearMap R s E` is the corresponding linear map
`(⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E`. This is bundled as a linear equivalence.
* `PiTensorProduct.reindex e` re-indexes the components of `⨂[R] i : ι, M` along `e : ι ≃ ι₂`.
* `PiTensorProduct.tmulEquiv` equivalence between a `TensorProduct` of `PiTensorProduct`s and
a single `PiTensorProduct`.
## Notations
* `⨂[R] i, s i` is defined as localized notation in locale `TensorProduct`.
* `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i` with `f : ∀ i, s i` is defined globally as the tensor product of all the `f i`'s.
## Implementation notes
* We define it via `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` with the `R` representing a "hidden" tensor
factor, rather than `FreeAddMonoid (Π i, s i)` to ensure that, if `ι` is an empty type,
the space is isomorphic to the base ring `R`.
* We have not restricted the index type `ι` to be a `Fintype`, as nothing we do here strictly
requires it. However, problems may arise in the case where `ι` is infinite; use at your own
caution.
* Instead of requiring `DecidableEq ι` as an argument to `PiTensorProduct` itself, we include it
as an argument in the constructors of the relation. A decidability instance still has to come
from somewhere due to the use of `Function.update`, but this hides it from the downstream user.
See the implementation notes for `MultilinearMap` for an extended discussion of this choice.
## TODO
* Define tensor powers, symmetric subspace, etc.
* API for the various ways `ι` can be split into subsets; connect this with the binary
tensor product.
* Include connection with holors.
* Port more of the API from the binary tensor product over to this case.
## Tags
multilinear, tensor, tensor product
-/
suppress_compilation
open Function
section Semiring
variable {ι ι₂ ι₃ : Type*}
variable {R : Type*} [CommSemiring R]
variable {R₁ R₂ : Type*}
variable {s : ι → Type*} [∀ i, AddCommMonoid (s i)] [∀ i, Module R (s i)]
variable {M : Type*} [AddCommMonoid M] [Module R M]
variable {E : Type*} [AddCommMonoid E] [Module R E]
variable {F : Type*} [AddCommMonoid F]
namespace PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- The relation on `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` that generates a congruence whose quotient is
the tensor product. -/
inductive Eqv : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i) → Prop
| of_zero : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)) 0
| of_zero_scalar : ∀ f : Π i, s i, Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (0, f)) 0
| of_add : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₁) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i m₂))
(FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
| of_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f) + FreeAddMonoid.of (r', f)) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r + r', f))
| of_smul : ∀ (_ : DecidableEq ι) (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
Eqv (FreeAddMonoid.of (r, update f i (r' • f i))) (FreeAddMonoid.of (r' * r, f))
| add_comm : ∀ x y, Eqv (x + y) (y + x)
end PiTensorProduct
variable (R) (s)
/-- `PiTensorProduct R s` with `R` a commutative semiring and `s : ι → Type*` is the tensor
product of all the `s i`'s. This is denoted by `⨂[R] i, s i`. -/
def PiTensorProduct : Type _ :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).Quotient
variable {R}
unsuppress_compilation in
/-- This enables the notation `⨂[R] i : ι, s i` for the pi tensor product `PiTensorProduct`,
given an indexed family of types `s : ι → Type*`. -/
scoped[TensorProduct] notation3:100"⨂["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => PiTensorProduct R f) => r
open TensorProduct
namespace PiTensorProduct
section Module
instance : AddCommMonoid (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).addMonoid with
add_comm := fun x y ↦
AddCon.induction_on₂ x y fun _ _ ↦
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.add_comm _ _ }
instance : Inhabited (⨂[R] i, s i) := ⟨0⟩
variable (R) {s}
/-- `tprodCoeff R r f` with `r : R` and `f : Π i, s i` is the tensor product of the vectors `f i`
over all `i : ι`, multiplied by the coefficient `r`. Note that this is meant as an auxiliary
definition for this file alone, and that one should use `tprod` defined below for most purposes. -/
def tprodCoeff (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) : ⨂[R] i, s i :=
AddCon.mk' _ <| FreeAddMonoid.of (r, f)
variable {R}
theorem zero_tprodCoeff (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R 0 f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero_scalar _
theorem zero_tprodCoeff' (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (hf : f i = 0) : tprodCoeff R z f = 0 :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_zero _ _ i hf
theorem add_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₁) + tprodCoeff R z (update f i m₂) =
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (m₁ + m₂)) :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add _ z f i m₁ m₂)
theorem add_tprodCoeff' (z₁ z₂ : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
tprodCoeff R z₁ f + tprodCoeff R z₂ f = tprodCoeff R (z₁ + z₂) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ (Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f)
theorem smul_tprodCoeff_aux [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R) :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r * z) f :=
Quotient.sound' <| AddConGen.Rel.of _ _ <| Eqv.of_smul _ _ _ _ _
theorem smul_tprodCoeff [DecidableEq ι] (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r : R₁) [SMul R₁ R]
[IsScalarTower R₁ R R] [SMul R₁ (s i)] [IsScalarTower R₁ R (s i)] :
tprodCoeff R z (update f i (r • f i)) = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := by
have h₁ : r • z = r • (1 : R) * z := by rw [smul_mul_assoc, one_mul]
have h₂ : r • f i = (r • (1 : R)) • f i := (smul_one_smul _ _ _).symm
rw [h₁, h₂]
exact smul_tprodCoeff_aux z f i _
/-- Construct an `AddMonoidHom` from `(⨂[R] i, s i)` to some space `F` from a function
`φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F` with the appropriate properties. -/
def liftAddHom (φ : (R × Π i, s i) → F)
(C0 : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (_ : f i = 0), φ (r, f) = 0)
(C0' : ∀ f : Π i, s i, φ (0, f) = 0)
(C_add : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (m₁ m₂ : s i),
φ (r, update f i m₁) + φ (r, update f i m₂) = φ (r, update f i (m₁ + m₂)))
(C_add_scalar : ∀ (r r' : R) (f : Π i, s i), φ (r, f) + φ (r', f) = φ (r + r', f))
(C_smul : ∀ [DecidableEq ι] (r : R) (f : Π i, s i) (i : ι) (r' : R),
φ (r, update f i (r' • f i)) = φ (r' * r, f)) :
(⨂[R] i, s i) →+ F :=
(addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).lift (FreeAddMonoid.lift φ) <|
AddCon.addConGen_le fun x y hxy ↦
match hxy with
| Eqv.of_zero r' f i hf =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0 r' f i hf]
| Eqv.of_zero_scalar f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C0']
| Eqv.of_add inst z f i m₁ m₂ =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_add inst]
| Eqv.of_add_scalar z₁ z₂ f =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, C_add_scalar]
| Eqv.of_smul inst z f i r' =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp [FreeAddMonoid.lift_eval_of, @C_smul inst]
| Eqv.add_comm x y =>
(AddCon.ker_rel _).2 <| by simp_rw [AddMonoidHom.map_add, add_comm]
/-- Induct using `tprodCoeff` -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on' {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(tprodCoeff : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (tprodCoeff R r f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
have C0 : motive 0 := by
have h₁ := tprodCoeff 0 0
rwa [zero_tprodCoeff] at h₁
refine AddCon.induction_on z fun x ↦ FreeAddMonoid.recOn x C0 ?_
simp_rw [AddCon.coe_add]
refine fun f y ih ↦ add _ _ ?_ ih
convert tprodCoeff f.1 f.2
section DistribMulAction
variable [Monoid R₁] [DistribMulAction R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R]
variable [Monoid R₂] [DistribMulAction R₂ R] [SMulCommClass R₂ R R]
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance hasSMul' : SMul R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun r ↦
liftAddHom (fun f : R × Π i, s i ↦ tprodCoeff R (r • f.1) f.2)
(fun r' f i hf ↦ by simp_rw [zero_tprodCoeff' _ f i hf])
(fun f ↦ by simp [zero_tprodCoeff]) (fun r' f i m₁ m₂ ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff])
(fun r' r'' f ↦ by simp [add_tprodCoeff', mul_add]) fun z f i r' ↦ by
simp [smul_tprodCoeff, mul_smul_comm]⟩
instance : SMul R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.hasSMul'
theorem smul_tprodCoeff' (r : R₁) (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) :
r • tprodCoeff R z f = tprodCoeff R (r • z) f := rfl
protected theorem smul_add (r : R₁) (x y : ⨂[R] i, s i) : r • (x + y) = r • x + r • y :=
AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
instance distribMulAction' : DistribMulAction R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) where
smul := (· • ·)
smul_add _ _ _ := AddMonoidHom.map_add _ _ _
mul_smul r r' x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r'' f} ↦ by simp [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_smul])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy]
one_smul x :=
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {r f} ↦ by rw [smul_tprodCoeff', one_smul])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]
smul_zero _ := AddMonoidHom.map_zero _
instance smulCommClass' [SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ R] : SMulCommClass R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_comm])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
instance isScalarTower' [SMul R₁ R₂] [IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ R] :
IsScalarTower R₁ R₂ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
⟨fun {r' r''} x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x (fun {xr xf} ↦ by simp only [smul_tprodCoeff', smul_assoc])
fun {z y} ihz ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihz, ihy]⟩
end DistribMulAction
-- Most of the time we want the instance below this one, which is easier for typeclass resolution
-- to find.
instance module' [Semiring R₁] [Module R₁ R] [SMulCommClass R₁ R R] : Module R₁ (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
{ PiTensorProduct.distribMulAction' with
add_smul := fun r r' x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', add_smul, add_tprodCoeff'])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_add_add_comm]
zero_smul := fun x ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' x
(fun {r f} ↦ by simp_rw [smul_tprodCoeff', zero_smul, zero_tprodCoeff])
fun {x y} ihx ihy ↦ by simp_rw [PiTensorProduct.smul_add, ihx, ihy, add_zero] }
-- shortcut instances
instance : Module R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.module'
instance : SMulCommClass R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.smulCommClass'
instance : IsScalarTower R R (⨂[R] i, s i) :=
PiTensorProduct.isScalarTower'
variable (R) in
/-- The canonical `MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)`.
`tprod R fun i => f i` has notation `⨂ₜ[R] i, f i`. -/
def tprod : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i) where
toFun := tprodCoeff R 1
map_update_add' {_ f} i x y := (add_tprodCoeff (1 : R) f i x y).symm
map_update_smul' {_ f} i r x := by
rw [smul_tprodCoeff', ← smul_tprodCoeff (1 : R) _ i, update_idem, update_self]
unsuppress_compilation in
@[inherit_doc tprod]
notation3:100 "⨂ₜ["R"] "(...)", "r:(scoped f => tprod R f) => r
theorem tprod_eq_tprodCoeff_one :
⇑(tprod R : MultilinearMap R s (⨂[R] i, s i)) = tprodCoeff R 1 := rfl
@[simp]
theorem tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod (z : R) (f : Π i, s i) : tprodCoeff R z f = z • tprod R f := by
have : z = z • (1 : R) := by simp only [mul_one, Algebra.id.smul_eq_mul]
conv_lhs => rw [this]
rfl
/-- The image of an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` in the `PiTensorProduct` is
equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries `(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma _root_.FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p =
List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) := by
-- TODO: this is defeq abuse: `p` is not a `List`.
match p with
| [] => rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_nil, List.map_nil, List.sum_nil]; rfl
| x :: ps =>
rw [FreeAddMonoid.toList_cons, List.map_cons, List.sum_cons, ← List.singleton_append,
← toPiTensorProduct ps, ← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod]
rfl
/-- The set of lifts of an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i` in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`. -/
def lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set (FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :=
{p | AddCon.toQuotient (c := addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)) p = x}
/-- An element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
if and only if `x` is equal to the sum of `a • ⨂ₜ[R] i, m i` over all the entries
`(a, m)` of `p`.
-/
lemma mem_lifts_iff (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) (p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)) :
p ∈ lifts x ↔ List.sum (List.map (fun x ↦ x.1 • ⨂ₜ[R] i, x.2 i) p.toList) = x := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, FreeAddMonoid.toPiTensorProduct]
/-- Every element of `⨂[R] i, s i` has a lift in `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)`.
-/
lemma nonempty_lifts (x : ⨂[R] i, s i) : Set.Nonempty (lifts x) := by
existsi @Quotient.out _ (addConGen (PiTensorProduct.Eqv R s)).toSetoid x
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq]
rw [← AddCon.quot_mk_eq_coe]
erw [Quot.out_eq]
/-- The empty list lifts the element `0` of `⨂[R] i, s i`.
-/
lemma lifts_zero : 0 ∈ lifts (0 : ⨂[R] i, s i) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff]; erw [List.map_nil]; rw [List.sum_nil]
/-- If elements `p,q` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lift elements `x,y` of `⨂[R] i, s i`
respectively, then `p + q` lifts `x + y`.
-/
lemma lifts_add {x y : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p q : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)}
(hp : p ∈ lifts x) (hq : q ∈ lifts y) : p + q ∈ lifts (x + y) := by
simp only [lifts, Set.mem_setOf_eq, AddCon.coe_add]
rw [hp, hq]
/-- If an element `p` of `FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)` lifts an element `x` of `⨂[R] i, s i`,
and if `a` is an element of `R`, then the list obtained by multiplying the first entry of each
element of `p` by `a` lifts `a • x`.
-/
lemma lifts_smul {x : ⨂[R] i, s i} {p : FreeAddMonoid (R × Π i, s i)} (h : p ∈ lifts x) (a : R) :
p.map (fun (y : R × Π i, s i) ↦ (a * y.1, y.2)) ∈ lifts (a • x) := by
rw [mem_lifts_iff] at h ⊢
rw [← h]
simp [Function.comp_def, mul_smul, List.smul_sum]
/-- Induct using scaled versions of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem induction_on {motive : (⨂[R] i, s i) → Prop} (z : ⨂[R] i, s i)
(smul_tprod : ∀ (r : R) (f : Π i, s i), motive (r • tprod R f))
(add : ∀ x y, motive x → motive y → motive (x + y)) :
motive z := by
simp_rw [← tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod] at smul_tprod
exact PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z smul_tprod add
@[ext]
theorem ext {φ₁ φ₂ : (⨂[R] i, s i) →ₗ[R] E}
(H : φ₁.compMultilinearMap (tprod R) = φ₂.compMultilinearMap (tprod R)) : φ₁ = φ₂ := by
refine LinearMap.ext ?_
refine fun z ↦
PiTensorProduct.induction_on' z ?_ fun {x y} hx hy ↦ by rw [φ₁.map_add, φ₂.map_add, hx, hy]
· intro r f
rw [tprodCoeff_eq_smul_tprod, φ₁.map_smul, φ₂.map_smul]
apply congr_arg
exact MultilinearMap.congr_fun H f
/-- The pure tensors (i.e. the elements of the image of `PiTensorProduct.tprod`) span
the tensor product. -/
theorem span_tprod_eq_top :
Submodule.span R (Set.range (tprod R)) = (⊤ : Submodule R (⨂[R] i, s i)) :=
Submodule.eq_top_iff'.mpr fun t ↦ t.induction_on
(fun _ _ ↦ Submodule.smul_mem _ _
| (Submodule.subset_span (by simp only [Set.mem_range, exists_apply_eq_apply])))
(fun _ _ hx hy ↦ Submodule.add_mem _ hx hy)
end Module
section Multilinear
| Mathlib/LinearAlgebra/PiTensorProduct.lean | 380 | 385 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Yaël Dillies. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Order.PropInstances
import Mathlib.Order.GaloisConnection.Defs
/-!
# Heyting algebras
This file defines Heyting, co-Heyting and bi-Heyting algebras.
A Heyting algebra is a bounded distributive lattice with an implication operation `⇨` such that
`a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c`. It also comes with a pseudo-complement `ᶜ`, such that `aᶜ = a ⇨ ⊥`.
Co-Heyting algebras are dual to Heyting algebras. They have a difference `\` and a negation `￢`
such that `a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c` and `￢a = ⊤ \ a`.
Bi-Heyting algebras are Heyting algebras that are also co-Heyting algebras.
From a logic standpoint, Heyting algebras precisely model intuitionistic logic, whereas boolean
algebras model classical logic.
Heyting algebras are the order theoretic equivalent of cartesian-closed categories.
## Main declarations
* `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra without a top element (nor negation).
* `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra without a bottom element (nor complement).
* `HeytingAlgebra`: Heyting algebra.
* `CoheytingAlgebra`: Co-Heyting algebra.
* `BiheytingAlgebra`: bi-Heyting algebra.
## References
* [Francis Borceux, *Handbook of Categorical Algebra III*][borceux-vol3]
## Tags
Heyting, Brouwer, algebra, implication, negation, intuitionistic
-/
assert_not_exists RelIso
open Function OrderDual
universe u
variable {ι α β : Type*}
/-! ### Notation -/
section
variable (α β)
instance Prod.instHImp [HImp α] [HImp β] : HImp (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 ⇨ b.1, a.2 ⇨ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHNot [HNot α] [HNot β] : HNot (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (￢a.1, ￢a.2)⟩
instance Prod.instSDiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] : SDiff (α × β) :=
⟨fun a b => (a.1 \ b.1, a.2 \ b.2)⟩
instance Prod.instHasCompl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] : HasCompl (α × β) :=
⟨fun a => (a.1ᶜ, a.2ᶜ)⟩
end
@[simp]
theorem fst_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).1 = a.1 ⇨ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_himp [HImp α] [HImp β] (a b : α × β) : (a ⇨ b).2 = a.2 ⇨ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).1 = ￢a.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_hnot [HNot α] [HNot β] (a : α × β) : (￢a).2 = ￢a.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).1 = a.1 \ b.1 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_sdiff [SDiff α] [SDiff β] (a b : α × β) : (a \ b).2 = a.2 \ b.2 :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem fst_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.1 = a.1ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem snd_compl [HasCompl α] [HasCompl β] (a : α × β) : aᶜ.2 = a.2ᶜ :=
rfl
namespace Pi
variable {π : ι → Type*}
instance [∀ i, HImp (π i)] : HImp (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a b i => a i ⇨ b i⟩
instance [∀ i, HNot (π i)] : HNot (∀ i, π i) :=
⟨fun a i => ￢a i⟩
theorem himp_def [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) : a ⇨ b = fun i => a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
theorem hnot_def [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) : ￢a = fun i => ￢a i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem himp_apply [∀ i, HImp (π i)] (a b : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (a ⇨ b) i = a i ⇨ b i :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem hnot_apply [∀ i, HNot (π i)] (a : ∀ i, π i) (i : ι) : (￢a) i = ￢a i :=
rfl
end Pi
/-- A generalized Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called
Heyting implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`.
This generalizes `HeytingAlgebra` by not requiring a bottom element. -/
class GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderTop α, HImp α where
/-- `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)` -/
le_himp_iff (a b c : α) : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c
/-- A generalized co-Heyting algebra is a lattice with an additional binary
difference operation `\` such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`.
This generalizes `CoheytingAlgebra` by not requiring a top element. -/
class GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends Lattice α, OrderBot α, SDiff α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- A Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary operation `⇨` called Heyting
implication such that `(a ⇨ ·)` is right adjoint to `(a ⊓ ·)`. -/
class HeytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α, OrderBot α, HasCompl α where
/-- `aᶜ` is defined as `a ⇨ ⊥` -/
himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ
/-- A co-Heyting algebra is a bounded lattice with an additional binary difference operation `\`
such that `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)`. -/
class CoheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α, OrderTop α, HNot α where
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
/-- A bi-Heyting algebra is a Heyting algebra that is also a co-Heyting algebra. -/
class BiheytingAlgebra (α : Type*) extends HeytingAlgebra α, SDiff α, HNot α where
/-- `(· \ a)` is left adjoint to `(· ⊔ a)` -/
sdiff_le_iff (a b c : α) : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c
/-- `⊤ \ a` is `￢a` -/
top_sdiff (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a
-- See note [lower instance priority]
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toOrderTop
attribute [instance 100] GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toOrderBot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) HeytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [HeytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ bot_le := ‹HeytingAlgebra α›.bot_le }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toBoundedOrder [CoheytingAlgebra α] : BoundedOrder α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) BiheytingAlgebra.toCoheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] :
CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹BiheytingAlgebra α› with }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and Heyting implication alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofHImp [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (himp : α → α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ himp b c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp,
compl := fun a => himp a ⊥,
le_himp_iff,
himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and complement operator alone. -/
abbrev HeytingAlgebra.ofCompl [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (compl : α → α)
(le_himp_iff : ∀ a b c, a ≤ compl b ⊔ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c) : HeytingAlgebra α where
himp := (compl · ⊔ ·)
compl := compl
le_himp_iff := le_himp_iff
himp_bot _ := sup_bot_eq _
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the lattice structure and the difference alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofSDiff [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (sdiff : α → α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, sdiff a b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ ‹DistribLattice α›, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
sdiff,
hnot := fun a => sdiff ⊤ a,
sdiff_le_iff,
top_sdiff := fun _ => rfl }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Construct a co-Heyting algebra from the difference and Heyting negation alone. -/
abbrev CoheytingAlgebra.ofHNot [DistribLattice α] [BoundedOrder α] (hnot : α → α)
(sdiff_le_iff : ∀ a b c, a ⊓ hnot b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c) : CoheytingAlgebra α where
sdiff a b := a ⊓ hnot b
hnot := hnot
sdiff_le_iff := sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff _ := top_inf_eq _
/-! In this section, we'll give interpretations of these results in the Heyting algebra model of
intuitionistic logic,- where `≤` can be interpreted as "validates", `⇨` as "implies", `⊓` as "and",
`⊔` as "or", `⊥` as "false" and `⊤` as "true". Note that we confuse `→` and `⊢` because those are
the same in this logic.
See also `Prop.heytingAlgebra`. -/
section GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
@[simp]
theorem le_himp_iff : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ a ⊓ b ≤ c :=
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.le_himp_iff _ _ _
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q ∧ p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_iff' : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ⊓ a ≤ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_comm]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem le_himp_comm : a ≤ b ⇨ c ↔ b ≤ a ⇨ c := by rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff']
/-- `p → q → p` -/
theorem le_himp : a ≤ b ⇨ a :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_left
/-- `p → p → q ↔ p → q` -/
theorem le_himp_iff_left : a ≤ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_idem]
/-- `p → p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_self : a ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
top_le_iff.1 <| le_himp_iff.2 inf_le_right
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p → q` -/
theorem himp_inf_le : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ b :=
le_himp_iff.1 le_rfl
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) → q` -/
theorem inf_himp_le : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ≤ b := by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
/-- `p ∧ (p → q) ↔ p ∧ q` -/
@[simp]
theorem inf_himp (a b : α) : a ⊓ (a ⇨ b) = a ⊓ b :=
le_antisymm (le_inf inf_le_left <| by rw [inf_comm, ← le_himp_iff]) <| inf_le_inf_left _ le_himp
/-- `(p → q) ∧ p ↔ q ∧ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_self (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a = b ⊓ a := by rw [inf_comm, inf_himp, inf_comm]
/-- The **deduction theorem** in the Heyting algebra model of intuitionistic logic:
an implication holds iff the conclusion follows from the hypothesis. -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_eq_top_iff : a ⇨ b = ⊤ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← top_le_iff, le_himp_iff, top_inf_eq]
/-- `p → true`, `true → p ↔ p` -/
@[simp]
theorem himp_top : a ⇨ ⊤ = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 le_top
@[simp]
theorem top_himp : ⊤ ⇨ a = a :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun b => by rw [le_himp_iff, inf_top_eq]
/-- `p → q → r ↔ p ∧ q → r` -/
theorem himp_himp (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = a ⊓ b ⇨ c :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, inf_assoc]
/-- `(q → r) → (p → q) → q → r` -/
theorem himp_le_himp_himp_himp : b ⇨ c ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, le_himp_iff, inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, ← inf_assoc, himp_inf_self, inf_assoc]
exact inf_le_left
@[simp]
theorem himp_inf_himp_inf_le : (b ⇨ c) ⊓ (a ⇨ b) ⊓ a ≤ c := by
simpa using @himp_le_himp_himp_himp
/-- `p → q → r ↔ q → p → r` -/
theorem himp_left_comm (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⇨ c = b ⇨ a ⇨ c := by simp_rw [himp_himp, inf_comm]
@[simp]
theorem himp_idem : b ⇨ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by rw [himp_himp, inf_idem]
theorem himp_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⇨ b ⊓ c = (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (a ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by simp_rw [le_himp_iff, le_inf_iff, le_himp_iff]
theorem sup_himp_distrib (a b c : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ c = (a ⇨ c) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun d => by
rw [le_inf_iff, le_himp_comm, sup_le_iff]
simp_rw [le_himp_comm]
theorem himp_le_himp_left (h : a ≤ b) : c ⇨ a ≤ c ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| himp_inf_le.trans h
theorem himp_le_himp_right (h : a ≤ b) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ c :=
le_himp_iff.2 <| (inf_le_inf_left _ h).trans himp_inf_le
theorem himp_le_himp (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : b ⇨ c ≤ a ⇨ d :=
(himp_le_himp_right hab).trans <| himp_le_himp_left hcd
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_left (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ a = b ⇨ a := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_himp_self_right (a b : α) : a ⊔ b ⇨ b = a ⇨ b := by
rw [sup_himp_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @top_himp _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_top, sup_himp_self_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_eq_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ b = b :=
h.symm.himp_eq_right
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_right (h : Codisjoint a b) : a ⇨ a ⊓ b = b := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, top_inf_eq, h.himp_eq_left]
theorem Codisjoint.himp_inf_cancel_left (h : Codisjoint a b) : b ⇨ a ⊓ b = a := by
rw [himp_inf_distrib, himp_self, inf_top_eq, h.himp_eq_right]
/-- See `himp_le` for a stronger version in Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Codisjoint.himp_le_of_right_le (hac : Codisjoint a c) (hba : b ≤ a) : c ⇨ b ≤ a :=
(himp_le_himp_left hba).trans_eq hac.himp_eq_right
theorem le_himp_himp : a ≤ (a ⇨ b) ⇨ b :=
le_himp_iff.2 inf_himp_le
@[simp] lemma himp_eq_himp_iff : b ⇨ a = a ⇨ b ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma himp_ne_himp_iff : b ⇨ a ≠ a ⇨ b ↔ a ≠ b := himp_eq_himp_iff.not
theorem himp_triangle (a b c : α) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) ≤ a ⇨ c := by
rw [le_himp_iff, inf_right_comm, ← le_himp_iff]
exact himp_inf_le.trans le_himp_himp
theorem himp_inf_himp_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : (a ⇨ b) ⊓ (b ⇨ c) = a ⇨ c :=
(himp_triangle _ _ _).antisymm <| le_inf (himp_le_himp_left hcb) (himp_le_himp_right hba)
theorem gc_inf_himp : GaloisConnection (a ⊓ ·) (a ⇨ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ Iff.symm le_himp_iff'
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
DistribLattice.ofInfSupLe fun a b c => by
simp_rw [inf_comm a, ← le_himp_iff, sup_le_iff, le_himp_iff, ← sup_le_iff]; rfl
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
le_himp_iff _ _ _ := and_congr le_himp_iff le_himp_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
le_himp_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra
section GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
variable [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α] {a b c d : α}
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_le_iff : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ b ⊔ c :=
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.sdiff_le_iff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_le_iff' : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a ≤ c ⊔ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_le_comm : a \ b ≤ c ↔ a \ c ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff']
theorem sdiff_le : a \ b ≤ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_right
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_left (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint (a \ c) b :=
h.mono_left sdiff_le
theorem Disjoint.disjoint_sdiff_right (h : Disjoint a b) : Disjoint a (b \ c) :=
h.mono_right sdiff_le
theorem sdiff_le_iff_left : a \ b ≤ b ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_self : a \ a = ⊥ :=
le_bot_iff.1 <| sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sup_left
theorem le_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ a \ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.1 le_rfl
theorem le_sdiff_sup : a ≤ a \ b ⊔ b := by rw [sup_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sup_sdiff_left : a ⊔ a \ b = a :=
sup_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem sup_sdiff_right : a \ b ⊔ a = a :=
sup_of_le_right sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_left : a \ b ⊓ a = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_left sdiff_le
theorem inf_sdiff_right : a ⊓ a \ b = a \ b :=
inf_of_le_right sdiff_le
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_self (a b : α) : a ⊔ b \ a = a ⊔ b :=
le_antisymm (sup_le_sup_left sdiff_le _) (sup_le le_sup_left le_sup_sdiff)
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sup_self (a b : α) : b \ a ⊔ a = b ⊔ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_comm]
alias sup_sdiff_self_left := sdiff_sup_self
alias sup_sdiff_self_right := sup_sdiff_self
theorem sup_sdiff_eq_sup (h : c ≤ a) : a ⊔ b \ c = a ⊔ b :=
sup_congr_left (sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right) <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
-- cf. `Set.union_diff_cancel'`
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel' (hab : a ≤ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : b ⊔ c \ a = c := by
rw [sup_sdiff_eq_sup hab, sup_of_le_right hbc]
theorem sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : a ≤ b) : a ⊔ b \ a = b :=
sup_sdiff_cancel' le_rfl h
theorem sdiff_sup_cancel (h : b ≤ a) : a \ b ⊔ b = a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_cancel_right h]
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_left (h : b ≤ c \ a) (hac : a ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le hac <| h.trans sdiff_le
theorem sup_le_of_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ c \ b) (hbc : b ≤ c) : a ⊔ b ≤ c :=
sup_le (h.trans sdiff_le) hbc
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_eq_bot_iff : a \ b = ⊥ ↔ a ≤ b := by rw [← le_bot_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_bot : a \ ⊥ = a :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun b => by rw [sdiff_le_iff, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem bot_sdiff : ⊥ \ a = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 bot_le
theorem sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff : (a \ b) \ (a \ c) ≤ c \ b := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, sup_sdiff_self, sup_left_comm, sdiff_sup_self,
sup_left_comm]
exact le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem le_sup_sdiff_sup_sdiff : a ≤ b ⊔ (a \ c ⊔ c \ b) := by
simpa using @sdiff_sdiff_sdiff_le_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sdiff (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_assoc]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_left : (a \ b) \ c = a \ (b ⊔ c) :=
sdiff_sdiff _ _ _
theorem sdiff_right_comm (a b c : α) : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b := by
simp_rw [sdiff_sdiff, sup_comm]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_comm : (a \ b) \ c = (a \ c) \ b :=
sdiff_right_comm _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_idem : (a \ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_left, sup_idem]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_sdiff_self : (a \ b) \ a = ⊥ := by rw [sdiff_sdiff_comm, sdiff_self, bot_sdiff]
theorem sup_sdiff_distrib (a b c : α) : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by simp_rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_iff]
theorem sdiff_inf_distrib (a b c : α) : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun d => by
rw [sup_le_iff, sdiff_le_comm, le_inf_iff]
simp_rw [sdiff_le_comm]
theorem sup_sdiff : (a ⊔ b) \ c = a \ c ⊔ b \ c :=
sup_sdiff_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_right_self : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a \ b := by rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sup_sdiff_left_self : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b \ a := by rw [sup_comm, sup_sdiff_right_self]
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_right (h : a ≤ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| h.trans <| le_sup_sdiff
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_left (h : a ≤ b) : c \ b ≤ c \ a :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 <| le_sup_sdiff.trans <| sup_le_sup_right h _
@[gcongr]
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff (hab : a ≤ b) (hcd : c ≤ d) : a \ d ≤ b \ c :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab).trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcd
-- cf. `IsCompl.inf_sup`
theorem sdiff_inf : a \ (b ⊓ c) = a \ b ⊔ a \ c :=
sdiff_inf_distrib _ _ _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_left (a b : α) : a \ (a ⊓ b) = a \ b := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq]
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_inf_self_right (a b : α) : b \ (a ⊓ b) = b \ a := by
rw [sdiff_inf, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_left (h : Disjoint a b) : a \ b = a := by
conv_rhs => rw [← @sdiff_bot _ _ a]
rw [← h.eq_bot, sdiff_inf_self_left]
theorem Disjoint.sdiff_eq_right (h : Disjoint a b) : b \ a = b :=
h.symm.sdiff_eq_left
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_left (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ a = b := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, bot_sup_eq, h.sdiff_eq_right]
theorem Disjoint.sup_sdiff_cancel_right (h : Disjoint a b) : (a ⊔ b) \ b = a := by
rw [sup_sdiff, sdiff_self, sup_bot_eq, h.sdiff_eq_left]
/-- See `le_sdiff` for a stronger version in generalised Boolean algebras. -/
theorem Disjoint.le_sdiff_of_le_left (hac : Disjoint a c) (hab : a ≤ b) : a ≤ b \ c :=
hac.sdiff_eq_left.ge.trans <| sdiff_le_sdiff_right hab
theorem sdiff_sdiff_le : a \ (a \ b) ≤ b :=
sdiff_le_iff.2 le_sdiff_sup
@[simp] lemma sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff : a \ b = b \ a ↔ a = b := by simp [le_antisymm_iff]
lemma sdiff_ne_sdiff_iff : a \ b ≠ b \ a ↔ a ≠ b := sdiff_eq_sdiff_iff.not
theorem sdiff_triangle (a b c : α) : a \ c ≤ a \ b ⊔ b \ c := by
rw [sdiff_le_iff, sup_left_comm, ← sdiff_le_iff]
exact sdiff_sdiff_le.trans le_sup_sdiff
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel (hba : b ≤ a) (hcb : c ≤ b) : a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c :=
(sdiff_triangle _ _ _).antisymm' <| sup_le (sdiff_le_sdiff_left hcb) (sdiff_le_sdiff_right hba)
/-- a version of `sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel` with more general hypotheses. -/
theorem sdiff_sup_sdiff_cancel' (hinf : a ⊓ c ≤ b) (hsup : b ≤ a ⊔ c) :
a \ b ⊔ b \ c = a \ c := by
refine (sdiff_triangle ..).antisymm' <| sup_le ?_ <| by simpa [sup_comm]
rw [← sdiff_inf_self_left (b := c)]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_left hinf
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_left (h : c ⊔ a ≤ c ⊔ b) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_left_self, ← @sup_sdiff_left_self _ _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
theorem sdiff_le_sdiff_of_sup_le_sup_right (h : a ⊔ c ≤ b ⊔ c) : a \ c ≤ b \ c := by
rw [← sup_sdiff_right_self, ← @sup_sdiff_right_self _ _ b]
exact sdiff_le_sdiff_right h
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_left : a \ c ⊓ (a ⊔ b) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_left
@[simp]
theorem inf_sdiff_sup_right : a \ c ⊓ (b ⊔ a) = a \ c :=
inf_of_le_left <| sdiff_le.trans le_sup_right
theorem gc_sdiff_sup : GaloisConnection (· \ a) (a ⊔ ·) :=
fun _ _ ↦ sdiff_le_iff
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
instance OrderDual.instGeneralizedHeytingAlgebra : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
himp := fun a b => toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
instance Prod.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
instance Pi.instGeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*}
[∀ i, GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (α i)] : GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
sdiff_le_iff i := by simp [le_def]
end GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra
section HeytingAlgebra
variable [HeytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem himp_bot (a : α) : a ⇨ ⊥ = aᶜ :=
HeytingAlgebra.himp_bot _
@[simp]
theorem bot_himp (a : α) : ⊥ ⇨ a = ⊤ :=
himp_eq_top_iff.2 bot_le
theorem compl_sup_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ := by
simp_rw [← himp_bot, sup_himp_distrib]
@[simp]
theorem compl_sup : (a ⊔ b)ᶜ = aᶜ ⊓ bᶜ :=
compl_sup_distrib _ _
theorem compl_le_himp : aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
(himp_bot _).ge.trans <| himp_le_himp_left bot_le
theorem compl_sup_le_himp : aᶜ ⊔ b ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le compl_le_himp le_himp
theorem sup_compl_le_himp : b ⊔ aᶜ ≤ a ⇨ b :=
sup_le le_himp compl_le_himp
-- `p → ¬ p ↔ ¬ p`
@[simp]
theorem himp_compl (a : α) : a ⇨ aᶜ = aᶜ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_himp, inf_idem]
-- `p → ¬ q ↔ q → ¬ p`
theorem himp_compl_comm (a b : α) : a ⇨ bᶜ = b ⇨ aᶜ := by simp_rw [← himp_bot, himp_left_comm]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_right : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
rw [← himp_bot, le_himp_iff, disjoint_iff_inf_le]
theorem le_compl_iff_disjoint_left : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ Disjoint b a :=
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right.trans disjoint_comm
theorem le_compl_comm : a ≤ bᶜ ↔ b ≤ aᶜ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, le_compl_iff_disjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_right⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Disjoint.le_compl_left⟩ := le_compl_iff_disjoint_left
alias le_compl_iff_le_compl := le_compl_comm
alias ⟨le_compl_of_le_compl, _⟩ := le_compl_comm
theorem disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint aᶜ a :=
disjoint_iff_inf_le.mpr <| le_himp_iff.1 (himp_bot _).ge
theorem disjoint_compl_right : Disjoint a aᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_left.symm
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_left (h : b ≤ a) : Disjoint aᶜ b :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.disjoint_compl_right (h : a ≤ b) : Disjoint a bᶜ :=
_root_.disjoint_compl_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.compl_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : aᶜ = b :=
h.1.le_compl_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2
theorem IsCompl.eq_compl (h : IsCompl a b) : a = bᶜ :=
h.1.le_compl_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint disjoint_compl_left h.2.symm
theorem compl_unique (h₀ : a ⊓ b = ⊥) (h₁ : a ⊔ b = ⊤) : aᶜ = b :=
(IsCompl.of_eq h₀ h₁).compl_eq
@[simp]
theorem inf_compl_self (a : α) : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_right.eq_bot
@[simp]
theorem compl_inf_self (a : α) : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
disjoint_compl_left.eq_bot
theorem inf_compl_eq_bot : a ⊓ aᶜ = ⊥ :=
inf_compl_self _
theorem compl_inf_eq_bot : aᶜ ⊓ a = ⊥ :=
compl_inf_self _
@[simp]
theorem compl_top : (⊤ : α)ᶜ = ⊥ :=
eq_of_forall_le_iff fun a => by rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_top, le_bot_iff]
@[simp]
theorem compl_bot : (⊥ : α)ᶜ = ⊤ := by rw [← himp_bot, himp_self]
@[simp] theorem le_compl_self : a ≤ aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, disjoint_self]
@[simp] theorem ne_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a ≠ aᶜ := by
intro h
cases le_compl_self.1 (le_of_eq h)
simp at h
@[simp] theorem compl_ne_self [Nontrivial α] : aᶜ ≠ a :=
ne_comm.1 ne_compl_self
@[simp] theorem lt_compl_self [Nontrivial α] : a < aᶜ ↔ a = ⊥ := by
rw [lt_iff_le_and_ne]; simp
theorem le_compl_compl : a ≤ aᶜᶜ :=
disjoint_compl_right.le_compl_right
theorem compl_anti : Antitone (compl : α → α) := fun _ _ h =>
le_compl_comm.1 <| h.trans le_compl_compl
@[gcongr]
theorem compl_le_compl (h : a ≤ b) : bᶜ ≤ aᶜ :=
compl_anti h
@[simp]
theorem compl_compl_compl (a : α) : aᶜᶜᶜ = aᶜ :=
(compl_anti le_compl_compl).antisymm le_compl_compl
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff : Disjoint aᶜᶜ b ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_left, compl_compl_compl]
@[simp]
theorem disjoint_compl_compl_right_iff : Disjoint a bᶜᶜ ↔ Disjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, compl_compl_compl]
theorem compl_sup_compl_le : aᶜ ⊔ bᶜ ≤ (a ⊓ b)ᶜ :=
sup_le (compl_anti inf_le_left) <| compl_anti inf_le_right
theorem compl_compl_inf_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⊓ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⊓ bᶜᶜ := by
refine ((compl_anti compl_sup_compl_le).trans (compl_sup_distrib _ _).le).antisymm ?_
rw [le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_assoc, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff,
disjoint_left_comm, disjoint_compl_compl_left_iff, ← disjoint_assoc, inf_comm]
exact disjoint_compl_right
theorem compl_compl_himp_distrib (a b : α) : (a ⇨ b)ᶜᶜ = aᶜᶜ ⇨ bᶜᶜ := by
apply le_antisymm
· rw [le_himp_iff, ← compl_compl_inf_distrib]
exact compl_anti (compl_anti himp_inf_le)
· refine le_compl_comm.1 ((compl_anti compl_sup_le_himp).trans ?_)
rw [compl_sup_distrib, le_compl_iff_disjoint_right, disjoint_right_comm, ←
le_compl_iff_disjoint_right]
exact inf_himp_le
instance OrderDual.instCoheytingAlgebra : CoheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
hnot := toDual ∘ compl ∘ ofDual
sdiff a b := toDual (ofDual b ⇨ ofDual a)
sdiff_le_iff a b c := by rw [sup_comm]; exact le_himp_iff
top_sdiff := @himp_bot α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_hnot (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (￢a) = (ofDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_compl (a : α) : toDual aᶜ = ￢toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instHeytingAlgebra [HeytingAlgebra β] : HeytingAlgebra (α × β) where
himp_bot a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨himp_bot a.1, himp_bot a.2⟩
instance Pi.instHeytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, HeytingAlgebra (α i)] :
HeytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
himp_bot f := funext fun i ↦ himp_bot (f i)
end HeytingAlgebra
section CoheytingAlgebra
variable [CoheytingAlgebra α] {a b : α}
@[simp]
theorem top_sdiff' (a : α) : ⊤ \ a = ￢a :=
CoheytingAlgebra.top_sdiff _
@[simp]
theorem sdiff_top (a : α) : a \ ⊤ = ⊥ :=
sdiff_eq_bot_iff.2 le_top
theorem hnot_inf_distrib (a b : α) : ￢(a ⊓ b) = ￢a ⊔ ￢b := by
simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_inf_distrib]
theorem sdiff_le_hnot : a \ b ≤ ￢b :=
(sdiff_le_sdiff_right le_top).trans_eq <| top_sdiff' _
theorem sdiff_le_inf_hnot : a \ b ≤ a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf sdiff_le sdiff_le_hnot
-- See note [lower instance priority]
instance (priority := 100) CoheytingAlgebra.toDistribLattice : DistribLattice α :=
{ ‹CoheytingAlgebra α› with
le_sup_inf :=
fun a b c => by simp_rw [← sdiff_le_iff, le_inf_iff, sdiff_le_iff, ← le_inf_iff]; rfl }
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sdiff (a : α) : ￢a \ a = ￢a := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_sdiff, sup_idem]
theorem hnot_sdiff_comm (a b : α) : ￢a \ b = ￢b \ a := by simp_rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_right_comm]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_le_iff, codisjoint_iff_le_sup]
theorem hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left : ￢a ≤ b ↔ Codisjoint b a :=
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right.trans codisjoint_comm
theorem hnot_le_comm : ￢a ≤ b ↔ ￢b ≤ a := by
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left]
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_right⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right
alias ⟨_, Codisjoint.hnot_le_left⟩ := hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left
theorem codisjoint_hnot_right : Codisjoint a (￢a) :=
codisjoint_iff_le_sup.2 <| sdiff_le_iff.1 (top_sdiff' _).le
theorem codisjoint_hnot_left : Codisjoint (￢a) a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.symm
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_left (h : a ≤ b) : Codisjoint (￢a) b :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_left.mono_right h
theorem LE.le.codisjoint_hnot_right (h : b ≤ a) : Codisjoint a (￢b) :=
_root_.codisjoint_hnot_right.mono_left h
theorem IsCompl.hnot_eq (h : IsCompl a b) : ￢a = b :=
h.2.hnot_le_right.antisymm <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1.symm codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem IsCompl.eq_hnot (h : IsCompl a b) : a = ￢b :=
h.2.hnot_le_left.antisymm' <| Disjoint.le_of_codisjoint h.1 codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem sup_hnot_self (a : α) : a ⊔ ￢a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_right
@[simp]
theorem hnot_sup_self (a : α) : ￢a ⊔ a = ⊤ :=
Codisjoint.eq_top codisjoint_hnot_left
@[simp]
theorem hnot_bot : ￢(⊥ : α) = ⊤ :=
eq_of_forall_ge_iff fun a => by rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_bot, top_le_iff]
@[simp]
theorem hnot_top : ￢(⊤ : α) = ⊥ := by rw [← top_sdiff', sdiff_self]
theorem hnot_hnot_le : ￢￢a ≤ a :=
codisjoint_hnot_right.hnot_le_left
theorem hnot_anti : Antitone (hnot : α → α) := fun _ _ h => hnot_le_comm.1 <| hnot_hnot_le.trans h
theorem hnot_le_hnot (h : a ≤ b) : ￢b ≤ ￢a :=
hnot_anti h
@[simp]
theorem hnot_hnot_hnot (a : α) : ￢￢￢a = ￢a :=
hnot_hnot_le.antisymm <| hnot_anti hnot_hnot_le
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff : Codisjoint (￢￢a) b ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, hnot_hnot_hnot]
@[simp]
theorem codisjoint_hnot_hnot_right_iff : Codisjoint a (￢￢b) ↔ Codisjoint a b := by
simp_rw [← hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, hnot_hnot_hnot]
theorem le_hnot_inf_hnot : ￢(a ⊔ b) ≤ ￢a ⊓ ￢b :=
le_inf (hnot_anti le_sup_left) <| hnot_anti le_sup_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sup_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a ⊔ b) = ￢￢a ⊔ ￢￢b := by
refine ((hnot_inf_distrib _ _).ge.trans <| hnot_anti le_hnot_inf_hnot).antisymm' ?_
rw [hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_left, codisjoint_assoc, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff,
codisjoint_left_comm, codisjoint_hnot_hnot_left_iff, ← codisjoint_assoc, sup_comm]
exact codisjoint_hnot_right
theorem hnot_hnot_sdiff_distrib (a b : α) : ￢￢(a \ b) = ￢￢a \ ￢￢b := by
apply le_antisymm
· refine hnot_le_comm.1 ((hnot_anti sdiff_le_inf_hnot).trans' ?_)
rw [hnot_inf_distrib, hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right, codisjoint_left_comm, ←
hnot_le_iff_codisjoint_right]
exact le_sdiff_sup
· rw [sdiff_le_iff, ← hnot_hnot_sup_distrib]
exact hnot_anti (hnot_anti le_sup_sdiff)
instance OrderDual.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
compl := toDual ∘ hnot ∘ ofDual
himp a b := toDual (ofDual b \ ofDual a)
le_himp_iff a b c := by rw [inf_comm]; exact sdiff_le_iff
himp_bot := @top_sdiff' α _
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_compl (a : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual aᶜ = ￢ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem ofDual_himp (a b : αᵒᵈ) : ofDual (a ⇨ b) = ofDual b \ ofDual a :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_hnot (a : α) : toDual (￢a) = (toDual a)ᶜ :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem toDual_sdiff (a b : α) : toDual (a \ b) = toDual b ⇨ toDual a :=
rfl
instance Prod.instCoheytingAlgebra [CoheytingAlgebra β] : CoheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
sdiff_le_iff _ _ _ := and_congr sdiff_le_iff sdiff_le_iff
top_sdiff a := Prod.ext_iff.2 ⟨top_sdiff' a.1, top_sdiff' a.2⟩
instance Pi.instCoheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, CoheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
CoheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
top_sdiff f := funext fun i ↦ top_sdiff' (f i)
end CoheytingAlgebra
section BiheytingAlgebra
variable [BiheytingAlgebra α] {a : α}
theorem compl_le_hnot : aᶜ ≤ ￢a :=
(disjoint_compl_left : Disjoint _ a).le_of_codisjoint codisjoint_hnot_right
end BiheytingAlgebra
/-- Propositions form a Heyting algebra with implication as Heyting implication and negation as
complement. -/
instance Prop.instHeytingAlgebra : HeytingAlgebra Prop :=
{ Prop.instDistribLattice, Prop.instBoundedOrder with
himp := (· → ·),
le_himp_iff := fun _ _ _ => and_imp.symm, himp_bot := fun _ => rfl }
@[simp]
theorem himp_iff_imp (p q : Prop) : p ⇨ q ↔ p → q :=
Iff.rfl
@[simp]
theorem compl_iff_not (p : Prop) : pᶜ ↔ ¬p :=
Iff.rfl
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- A bounded linear order is a bi-Heyting algebra by setting
* `a ⇨ b = ⊤` if `a ≤ b` and `a ⇨ b = b` otherwise.
* `a \ b = ⊥` if `a ≤ b` and `a \ b = a` otherwise. -/
abbrev LinearOrder.toBiheytingAlgebra [LinearOrder α] [BoundedOrder α] : BiheytingAlgebra α :=
{ LinearOrder.toLattice, ‹BoundedOrder α› with
himp := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊤ else b,
compl := fun a => if a = ⊥ then ⊤ else ⊥,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true le_top (inf_le_of_right_le h)
· rw [inf_le_iff, or_iff_left h],
himp_bot := fun _ => if_congr le_bot_iff rfl rfl, sdiff := fun a b => if a ≤ b then ⊥ else a,
hnot := fun a => if a = ⊤ then ⊥ else ⊤,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
split_ifs with h
· exact iff_of_true bot_le (le_sup_of_le_left h)
· rw [le_sup_iff, or_iff_right h],
top_sdiff := fun _ => if_congr top_le_iff rfl rfl }
instance OrderDual.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] : BiheytingAlgebra αᵒᵈ where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Prod.instBiheytingAlgebra [BiheytingAlgebra α] [BiheytingAlgebra β] :
BiheytingAlgebra (α × β) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
instance Pi.instBiheytingAlgebra {α : ι → Type*} [∀ i, BiheytingAlgebra (α i)] :
BiheytingAlgebra (∀ i, α i) where
__ := instHeytingAlgebra
__ := instCoheytingAlgebra
section lift
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedHeytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α]
[HImp α] [GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) : GeneralizedHeytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Top α›
__ := ‹HImp α›
le_top := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_top]
exact le_top,
le_himp_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_himp, map_inf, le_himp_iff] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Bot α]
[SDiff α] [GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) :
GeneralizedCoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.lattice f map_sup map_inf
__ := ‹Bot α›
__ := ‹SDiff α›
bot_le := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_bot]
exact bot_le,
sdiff_le_iff := fun a b c => by
change f _ ≤ _ ↔ f _ ≤ _
rw [map_sdiff, map_sup, sdiff_le_iff] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `HeytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.heytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α] [Bot α]
[HasCompl α] [HImp α] [HeytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_compl : ∀ a, f aᶜ = (f a)ᶜ)
(map_himp : ∀ a b, f (a ⇨ b) = f a ⇨ f b) : HeytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.generalizedHeytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_top map_himp
__ := ‹Bot α›
__ := ‹HasCompl α›
bot_le := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_bot]
exact bot_le,
himp_bot := fun a => hf <| by rw [map_himp, map_compl, map_bot, himp_bot] }
-- See note [reducible non-instances]
/-- Pullback a `CoheytingAlgebra` along an injection. -/
protected abbrev Function.Injective.coheytingAlgebra [Max α] [Min α] [Top α] [Bot α]
[HNot α] [SDiff α] [CoheytingAlgebra β] (f : α → β) (hf : Injective f)
(map_sup : ∀ a b, f (a ⊔ b) = f a ⊔ f b) (map_inf : ∀ a b, f (a ⊓ b) = f a ⊓ f b)
(map_top : f ⊤ = ⊤) (map_bot : f ⊥ = ⊥) (map_hnot : ∀ a, f (￢a) = ￢f a)
(map_sdiff : ∀ a b, f (a \ b) = f a \ f b) : CoheytingAlgebra α :=
{ __ := hf.generalizedCoheytingAlgebra f map_sup map_inf map_bot map_sdiff
__ := ‹Top α›
__ := ‹HNot α›
le_top := fun a => by
change f _ ≤ _
rw [map_top]
| exact le_top,
top_sdiff := fun a => hf <| by rw [map_sdiff, map_hnot, map_top, top_sdiff'] }
| Mathlib/Order/Heyting/Basic.lean | 1,049 | 1,050 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 Hanting Zhang. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Hanting Zhang
-/
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Antilipschitz
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Isometry
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Lipschitz
import Mathlib.Data.FunLike.Basic
/-!
# Dilations
We define dilations, i.e., maps between emetric spaces that satisfy
`edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y` for some `r ∉ {0, ∞}`.
The value `r = 0` is not allowed because we want dilations of (e)metric spaces to be automatically
injective. The value `r = ∞` is not allowed because this way we can define `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`,
not `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0∞`. Also, we do not often need maps sending distinct points to points at
infinite distance.
## Main definitions
* `Dilation.ratio f : ℝ≥0`: the value of `r` in the relation above, defaulting to 1 in the case
where it is not well-defined.
## Notation
- `α →ᵈ β`: notation for `Dilation α β`.
## Implementation notes
The type of dilations defined in this file are also referred to as "similarities" or "similitudes"
by other authors. The name `Dilation` was chosen to match the Wikipedia name.
Since a lot of elementary properties don't require `eq_of_dist_eq_zero` we start setting up the
theory for `PseudoEMetricSpace` and we specialize to `PseudoMetricSpace` and `MetricSpace` when
needed.
## TODO
- Introduce dilation equivs.
- Refactor the `Isometry` API to match the `*HomClass` API below.
## References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilation_(metric_space)
- [Marcel Berger, *Geometry*][berger1987]
-/
noncomputable section
open Bornology Function Set Topology
open scoped ENNReal NNReal
section Defs
variable (α : Type*) (β : Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
/-- A dilation is a map that uniformly scales the edistance between any two points. -/
structure Dilation where
toFun : α → β
edist_eq' : ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (toFun x) (toFun y) = r * edist x y
@[inherit_doc] infixl:25 " →ᵈ " => Dilation
/-- `DilationClass F α β r` states that `F` is a type of `r`-dilations.
You should extend this typeclass when you extend `Dilation`. -/
class DilationClass (F : Type*) (α β : outParam Type*) [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
[FunLike F α β] : Prop where
edist_eq' : ∀ f : F, ∃ r : ℝ≥0, r ≠ 0 ∧ ∀ x y : α, edist (f x) (f y) = r * edist x y
end Defs
namespace Dilation
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type*} {γ : Type*} {F : Type*}
section Setup
variable [PseudoEMetricSpace α] [PseudoEMetricSpace β]
instance funLike : FunLike (α →ᵈ β) α β where
coe := toFun
coe_injective' f g h := by cases f; cases g; congr
instance toDilationClass : DilationClass (α →ᵈ β) α β where
edist_eq' f := edist_eq' f
@[simp]
theorem toFun_eq_coe {f : α →ᵈ β} : f.toFun = (f : α → β) :=
rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_mk (f : α → β) (h) : ⇑(⟨f, h⟩ : α →ᵈ β) = f :=
rfl
protected theorem congr_fun {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : f = g) (x : α) : f x = g x :=
DFunLike.congr_fun h x
protected theorem congr_arg (f : α →ᵈ β) {x y : α} (h : x = y) : f x = f y :=
DFunLike.congr_arg f h
@[ext]
theorem ext {f g : α →ᵈ β} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g :=
DFunLike.ext f g h
@[simp]
theorem mk_coe (f : α →ᵈ β) (h) : Dilation.mk f h = f :=
ext fun _ => rfl
/-- Copy of a `Dilation` with a new `toFun` equal to the old one. Useful to fix definitional
equalities. -/
@[simps -fullyApplied]
protected def copy (f : α →ᵈ β) (f' : α → β) (h : f' = ⇑f) : α →ᵈ β where
toFun := f'
edist_eq' := h.symm ▸ f.edist_eq'
theorem copy_eq_self (f : α →ᵈ β) {f' : α → β} (h : f' = f) : f.copy f' h = f :=
DFunLike.ext' h
variable [FunLike F α β]
open Classical in
/-- The ratio of a dilation `f`. If the ratio is undefined (i.e., the distance between any two
points in `α` is either zero or infinity), then we choose one as the ratio. -/
def ratio [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ℝ≥0 :=
if ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ⊤ then 1 else (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose
theorem ratio_of_trivial [DilationClass F α β] (f : F)
(h : ∀ x y : α, edist x y = 0 ∨ edist x y = ∞) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos h
@[nontriviality]
theorem ratio_of_subsingleton [Subsingleton α] [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f = 1 :=
if_pos fun x y ↦ by simp [Subsingleton.elim x y]
theorem ratio_ne_zero [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : ratio f ≠ 0 := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs
· exact one_ne_zero
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.1
theorem ratio_pos [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) : 0 < ratio f :=
(ratio_ne_zero f).bot_lt
@[simp]
theorem edist_eq [DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
edist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * edist x y := by
rw [ratio]; split_ifs with key
· rcases DilationClass.edist_eq' f with ⟨r, hne, hr⟩
replace hr := hr x y
rcases key x y with h | h
· simp only [hr, h, mul_zero]
· simp [hr, h, hne]
exact (DilationClass.edist_eq' f).choose_spec.2 x y
@[simp]
theorem nndist_eq {α β F : Type*} [PseudoMetricSpace α] [PseudoMetricSpace β] [FunLike F α β]
[DilationClass F α β] (f : F) (x y : α) :
| nndist (f x) (f y) = ratio f * nndist x y := by
simp only [← ENNReal.coe_inj, ← edist_nndist, ENNReal.coe_mul, edist_eq]
@[simp]
| Mathlib/Topology/MetricSpace/Dilation.lean | 160 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Damiano Testa. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Damiano Testa
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Regular.Basic
import Mathlib.GroupTheory.GroupAction.Hom
/-!
# Action of regular elements on a module
We introduce `M`-regular elements, in the context of an `R`-module `M`. The corresponding
predicate is called `IsSMulRegular`.
There are very limited typeclass assumptions on `R` and `M`, but the "mathematical" case of interest
is a commutative ring `R` acting on a module `M`. Since the properties are "multiplicative", there
is no actual requirement of having an addition, but there is a zero in both `R` and `M`.
SMultiplications involving `0` are, of course, all trivial.
The defining property is that an element `a ∈ R` is `M`-regular if the smultiplication map
`M → M`, defined by `m ↦ a • m`, is injective.
This property is the direct generalization to modules of the property `IsLeftRegular` defined in
`Algebra/Regular`. Lemma `isLeftRegular_iff` shows that indeed the two notions
coincide.
-/
variable {R S : Type*} (M : Type*) {a b : R} {s : S}
/-- An `M`-regular element is an element `c` such that multiplication on the left by `c` is an
injective map `M → M`. -/
def IsSMulRegular [SMul R M] (c : R) :=
Function.Injective ((c • ·) : M → M)
theorem IsLeftRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsLeftRegular c) : IsSMulRegular R c :=
h
/-- Left-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `R`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isLeftRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} : IsLeftRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R a :=
Iff.rfl
theorem IsRightRegular.isSMulRegular [Mul R] {c : R} (h : IsRightRegular c) :
IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op c) :=
h
/-- Right-regular multiplication on `R` is equivalent to `Rᵐᵒᵖ`-regularity of `R` itself. -/
theorem isRightRegular_iff [Mul R] {a : R} :
IsRightRegular a ↔ IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a) :=
Iff.rfl
namespace IsSMulRegular
variable {M}
section SMul
variable [SMul R M] [SMul R S] [SMul S M] [IsScalarTower R S M]
/-- The product of `M`-regular elements is `M`-regular. -/
theorem smul (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rs : IsSMulRegular M s) : IsSMulRegular M (a • s) :=
fun _ _ ab => rs (ra ((smul_assoc _ _ _).symm.trans (ab.trans (smul_assoc _ _ _))))
/-- If an element `b` becomes `M`-regular after multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular
element, then `b` is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_smul (a : R) (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a • s)) : IsSMulRegular M s :=
@Function.Injective.of_comp _ _ _ (fun m : M => a • m) _ fun c d cd => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at cd
rw [← smul_assoc, ← smul_assoc] at cd
exact ab cd
/-- An element is `M`-regular if and only if multiplying it on the left by an `M`-regular element
is `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem smul_iff (b : S) (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a • b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_smul _, ha.smul⟩
theorem isLeftRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R a) : IsLeftRegular a :=
h
theorem isRightRegular [Mul R] {a : R} (h : IsSMulRegular R (MulOpposite.op a)) :
IsRightRegular a :=
h
theorem mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) (rb : IsSMulRegular M b) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) :=
ra.smul rb
theorem of_mul [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ab : IsSMulRegular M (a * b)) :
IsSMulRegular M b := by
rw [← smul_eq_mul] at ab
exact ab.of_smul _
@[simp]
theorem mul_iff_right [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] (ha : IsSMulRegular M a) :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ↔ IsSMulRegular M b :=
⟨of_mul, ha.mul⟩
/-- Two elements `a` and `b` are `M`-regular if and only if both products `a * b` and `b * a`
are `M`-regular. -/
theorem mul_and_mul_iff [Mul R] [IsScalarTower R R M] :
IsSMulRegular M (a * b) ∧ IsSMulRegular M (b * a) ↔ IsSMulRegular M a ∧ IsSMulRegular M b := by
refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩
· rintro ⟨ab, ba⟩
exact ⟨ba.of_mul, ab.of_mul⟩
· rintro ⟨ha, hb⟩
exact ⟨ha.mul hb, hb.mul ha⟩
lemma of_injective {N F} [SMul R N] [FunLike F M N] [MulActionHomClass F R M N]
(f : F) {r : R} (h1 : Function.Injective f) (h2 : IsSMulRegular N r) :
IsSMulRegular M r := fun x y h3 => h1 <| h2 <|
(map_smulₛₗ f r x).symm.trans ((congrArg f h3).trans (map_smulₛₗ f r y))
end SMul
section Monoid
variable [Monoid R] [MulAction R M]
variable (M)
/-- One is always `M`-regular. -/
@[simp]
theorem one : IsSMulRegular M (1 : R) := fun a b ab => by
dsimp only [Function.comp_def] at ab
rw [one_smul, one_smul] at ab
assumption
variable {M}
/-- An element of `R` admitting a left inverse is `M`-regular. -/
theorem of_mul_eq_one (h : a * b = 1) : IsSMulRegular M b :=
of_mul (a := a) (by rw [h]; exact one M)
/-- Any power of an `M`-regular element is `M`-regular. -/
theorem pow (n : ℕ) (ra : IsSMulRegular M a) : IsSMulRegular M (a ^ n) := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero]; simp only [one]
| succ n hn =>
| rw [pow_succ']
exact (ra.smul_iff (a ^ n)).mpr hn
/-- An element `a` is `M`-regular if and only if a positive power of `a` is `M`-regular. -/
| Mathlib/Algebra/Regular/SMul.lean | 139 | 142 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Chris Hughes. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Chris Hughes, Johannes Hölzl, Kim Morrison, Jens Wagemaker, Johan Commelin
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.RingDivision
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Finite.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Coprime.Lemmas
import Mathlib.RingTheory.Localization.FractionRing
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Theory of univariate polynomials
We define the multiset of roots of a polynomial, and prove basic results about it.
## Main definitions
* `Polynomial.roots p`: The multiset containing all the roots of `p`, including their
multiplicities.
* `Polynomial.rootSet p E`: The set of distinct roots of `p` in an algebra `E`.
## Main statements
* `Polynomial.C_leadingCoeff_mul_prod_multiset_X_sub_C`: If a polynomial has as many roots as its
degree, it can be written as the product of its leading coefficient with `∏ (X - a)` where `a`
ranges through its roots.
-/
assert_not_exists Ideal
open Multiset Finset
noncomputable section
namespace Polynomial
universe u v w z
variable {R : Type u} {S : Type v} {T : Type w} {a b : R} {n : ℕ}
section CommRing
variable [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] {p q : R[X]}
section Roots
/-- `roots p` noncomputably gives a multiset containing all the roots of `p`,
including their multiplicities. -/
noncomputable def roots (p : R[X]) : Multiset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
haveI := Classical.dec (p = 0)
if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h)
theorem roots_def [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) [Decidable (p = 0)] :
p.roots = if h : p = 0 then ∅ else Classical.choose (exists_multiset_roots h) := by
rename_i iR ip0
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim iR (Classical.decEq R)
obtain rfl := Subsingleton.elim ip0 (Classical.dec (p = 0))
rfl
@[simp]
theorem roots_zero : (0 : R[X]).roots = 0 :=
dif_pos rfl
theorem card_roots (hp0 : p ≠ 0) : (Multiset.card (roots p) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p := by
classical
unfold roots
rw [dif_neg hp0]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp0)).1
theorem card_roots' (p : R[X]) : Multiset.card p.roots ≤ natDegree p := by
by_cases hp0 : p = 0
· simp [hp0]
exact WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 (le_trans (card_roots hp0) (le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree hp0))
theorem card_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree p :=
calc
(Multiset.card (p - C a).roots : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree (p - C a) :=
card_roots <| mt sub_eq_zero.1 fun h => not_le_of_gt hp0 <| h.symm ▸ degree_C_le
_ = degree p := by rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← C_neg]; exact degree_add_C hp0
theorem card_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
Multiset.card (p - C a).roots ≤ natDegree p :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots_sub_C hp0)
(le_of_eq <| degree_eq_natDegree fun h => by simp_all [lt_irrefl]))
@[simp]
theorem count_roots [DecidableEq R] (p : R[X]) : p.roots.count a = rootMultiplicity a p := by
classical
by_cases hp : p = 0
· simp [hp]
rw [roots_def, dif_neg hp]
exact (Classical.choose_spec (exists_multiset_roots hp)).2 a
@[simp]
theorem mem_roots' : a ∈ p.roots ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ IsRoot p a := by
classical
rw [← count_pos, count_roots p, rootMultiplicity_pos']
theorem mem_roots (hp : p ≠ 0) : a ∈ p.roots ↔ IsRoot p a :=
mem_roots'.trans <| and_iff_right hp
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : p ≠ 0 :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).1
theorem isRoot_of_mem_roots (h : a ∈ p.roots) : IsRoot p a :=
(mem_roots'.1 h).2
theorem mem_roots_map_of_injective [Semiring S] {p : S[X]} {f : S →+* R}
(hf : Function.Injective f) {x : R} (hp : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ (p.map f).roots ↔ p.eval₂ f x = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots ((Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff hf).mpr hp), IsRoot, eval_map]
lemma mem_roots_iff_aeval_eq_zero {x : R} (w : p ≠ 0) : x ∈ roots p ↔ aeval x p = 0 := by
rw [aeval_def, ← mem_roots_map_of_injective (FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective _ _) w,
Algebra.id.map_eq_id, map_id]
theorem card_le_degree_of_subset_roots {p : R[X]} {Z : Finset R} (h : Z.val ⊆ p.roots) :
#Z ≤ p.natDegree :=
(Multiset.card_le_card (Finset.val_le_iff_val_subset.2 h)).trans (Polynomial.card_roots' p)
theorem finite_setOf_isRoot {p : R[X]} (hp : p ≠ 0) : Set.Finite { x | IsRoot p x } := by
classical
simpa only [← Finset.setOf_mem, Multiset.mem_toFinset, mem_roots hp]
using p.roots.toFinset.finite_toSet
theorem eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot (p : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | IsRoot p x }) : p = 0 :=
not_imp_comm.mp finite_setOf_isRoot h
theorem exists_max_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x ≤ x₀ :=
Set.exists_upper_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem exists_min_root [LinearOrder R] (p : R[X]) (hp : p ≠ 0) : ∃ x₀, ∀ x, p.IsRoot x → x₀ ≤ x :=
Set.exists_lower_bound_image _ _ <| finite_setOf_isRoot hp
theorem eq_of_infinite_eval_eq (p q : R[X]) (h : Set.Infinite { x | eval x p = eval x q }) :
p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply eq_zero_of_infinite_isRoot
simpa only [IsRoot, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero]
theorem roots_mul {p q : R[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) : (p * q).roots = p.roots + q.roots := by
classical
exact Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => by
rw [count_add, count_roots, count_roots, count_roots, rootMultiplicity_mul hpq]
theorem roots.le_of_dvd (h : q ≠ 0) : p ∣ q → roots p ≤ roots q := by
rintro ⟨k, rfl⟩
exact Multiset.le_iff_exists_add.mpr ⟨k.roots, roots_mul h⟩
theorem mem_roots_sub_C' {p : R[X]} {a x : R} : x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p ≠ C a ∧ p.eval x = a := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, sub_ne_zero, eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, eval_C]
theorem mem_roots_sub_C {p : R[X]} {a x : R} (hp0 : 0 < degree p) :
x ∈ (p - C a).roots ↔ p.eval x = a :=
mem_roots_sub_C'.trans <| and_iff_right fun hp => hp0.not_le <| hp.symm ▸ degree_C_le
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_sub_C (r : R) : roots (X - C r) = {r} := by
classical
ext s
rw [count_roots, rootMultiplicity_X_sub_C, count_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem roots_X_add_C (r : R) : roots (X + C r) = {-r} := by simpa using roots_X_sub_C (-r)
@[simp]
theorem roots_X : roots (X : R[X]) = {0} := by rw [← roots_X_sub_C, C_0, sub_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C (x : R) : (C x).roots = 0 := by
classical exact
if H : x = 0 then by rw [H, C_0, roots_zero]
else
Multiset.ext.mpr fun r => (by
rw [count_roots, count_zero, rootMultiplicity_eq_zero (not_isRoot_C _ _ H)])
@[simp]
theorem roots_one : (1 : R[X]).roots = ∅ :=
roots_C 1
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (C a * p).roots = p.roots := by
by_cases hp : p = 0 <;>
simp only [roots_mul, *, Ne, mul_eq_zero, C_eq_zero, or_self_iff, not_false_iff, roots_C,
zero_add, mul_zero]
@[simp]
theorem roots_smul_nonzero (p : R[X]) (ha : a ≠ 0) : (a • p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [smul_eq_C_mul, roots_C_mul _ ha]
@[simp]
lemma roots_neg (p : R[X]) : (-p).roots = p.roots := by
rw [← neg_one_smul R p, roots_smul_nonzero p (neg_ne_zero.mpr one_ne_zero)]
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X - C b).roots =
{a⁻¹ * b} := by
rw [← roots_C_mul _ (Units.ne_zero a⁻¹), mul_sub, ← mul_assoc, ← C_mul, ← C_mul,
Units.inv_mul, C_1, one_mul]
exact roots_X_sub_C (a⁻¹ * b)
@[simp]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_add_C_of_IsUnit (b : R) (a : Rˣ) : (C (a : R) * X + C b).roots =
{-(a⁻¹ * b)} := by
rw [← sub_neg_eq_add, ← C_neg, roots_C_mul_X_sub_C_of_IsUnit, mul_neg]
theorem roots_list_prod (L : List R[X]) :
(0 : R[X]) ∉ L → L.prod.roots = (L : Multiset R[X]).bind roots :=
List.recOn L (fun _ => roots_one) fun hd tl ih H => by
rw [List.mem_cons, not_or] at H
rw [List.prod_cons, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (Ne.symm H.1) <| List.prod_ne_zero H.2), ←
Multiset.cons_coe, Multiset.cons_bind, ih H.2]
theorem roots_multiset_prod (m : Multiset R[X]) : (0 : R[X]) ∉ m → m.prod.roots = m.bind roots := by
rcases m with ⟨L⟩
simpa only [Multiset.prod_coe, quot_mk_to_coe''] using roots_list_prod L
theorem roots_prod {ι : Type*} (f : ι → R[X]) (s : Finset ι) :
s.prod f ≠ 0 → (s.prod f).roots = s.val.bind fun i => roots (f i) := by
rcases s with ⟨m, hm⟩
simpa [Multiset.prod_eq_zero_iff, Multiset.bind_map] using roots_multiset_prod (m.map f)
@[simp]
theorem roots_pow (p : R[X]) (n : ℕ) : (p ^ n).roots = n • p.roots := by
induction n with
| zero => rw [pow_zero, roots_one, zero_smul, empty_eq_zero]
| succ n ihn =>
rcases eq_or_ne p 0 with (rfl | hp)
· rw [zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero, roots_zero, smul_zero]
· rw [pow_succ, roots_mul (mul_ne_zero (pow_ne_zero _ hp) hp), ihn, add_smul, one_smul]
theorem roots_X_pow (n : ℕ) : (X ^ n : R[X]).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_pow, roots_X]
theorem roots_C_mul_X_pow (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) :
Polynomial.roots (C a * X ^ n) = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [roots_C_mul _ ha, roots_X_pow]
@[simp]
theorem roots_monomial (ha : a ≠ 0) (n : ℕ) : (monomial n a).roots = n • ({0} : Multiset R) := by
rw [← C_mul_X_pow_eq_monomial, roots_C_mul_X_pow ha]
theorem roots_prod_X_sub_C (s : Finset R) : (s.prod fun a => X - C a).roots = s.val := by
apply (roots_prod (fun a => X - C a) s ?_).trans
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· refine prod_ne_zero_iff.mpr (fun a _ => X_sub_C_ne_zero a)
@[simp]
theorem roots_multiset_prod_X_sub_C (s : Multiset R) : (s.map fun a => X - C a).prod.roots = s := by
rw [roots_multiset_prod, Multiset.bind_map]
· simp_rw [roots_X_sub_C]
rw [Multiset.bind_singleton, Multiset.map_id']
· rw [Multiset.mem_map]
rintro ⟨a, -, h⟩
exact X_sub_C_ne_zero a h
theorem card_roots_X_pow_sub_C {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) (a : R) :
Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) ≤ n :=
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1 <|
calc
(Multiset.card (roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)) : WithBot ℕ) ≤ degree ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a) :=
card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a)
_ = n := degree_X_pow_sub_C hn a
section NthRoots
/-- `nthRoots n a` noncomputably returns the solutions to `x ^ n = a`. -/
def nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset R :=
roots ((X : R[X]) ^ n - C a)
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRoots {n : ℕ} (hn : 0 < n) {a x : R} : x ∈ nthRoots n a ↔ x ^ n = a := by
rw [nthRoots, mem_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero hn a), IsRoot.def, eval_sub, eval_C, eval_pow,
eval_X, sub_eq_zero]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero (r : R) : nthRoots 0 r = 0 := by
simp only [empty_eq_zero, pow_zero, nthRoots, ← C_1, ← C_sub, roots_C]
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_zero_right {R} [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] (n : ℕ) :
nthRoots n (0 : R) = Multiset.replicate n 0 := by
rw [nthRoots, C.map_zero, sub_zero, roots_pow, roots_X, Multiset.nsmul_singleton]
theorem card_nthRoots (n : ℕ) (a : R) : Multiset.card (nthRoots n a) ≤ n := by
classical exact
(if hn : n = 0 then
if h : (X : R[X]) ^ n - C a = 0 then by
simp [Nat.zero_le, nthRoots, roots, h, dif_pos rfl, empty_eq_zero, Multiset.card_zero]
else
WithBot.coe_le_coe.1
(le_trans (card_roots h)
(by
rw [hn, pow_zero, ← C_1, ← RingHom.map_sub]
exact degree_C_le))
else by
rw [← Nat.cast_le (α := WithBot ℕ)]
rw [← degree_X_pow_sub_C (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a]
exact card_roots (X_pow_sub_C_ne_zero (Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a))
@[simp]
theorem nthRoots_two_eq_zero_iff {r : R} : nthRoots 2 r = 0 ↔ ¬IsSquare r := by
simp_rw [isSquare_iff_exists_sq, eq_zero_iff_forall_not_mem, mem_nthRoots (by norm_num : 0 < 2),
← not_exists, eq_comm]
/-- The multiset `nthRoots ↑n a` as a Finset. Previously `nthRootsFinset n` was defined to be
`nthRoots n (1 : R)` as a Finset. That situation can be recovered by setting `a` to be `(1 : R)` -/
def nthRootsFinset (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] : Finset R :=
haveI := Classical.decEq R
Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a)
lemma nthRootsFinset_def (n : ℕ) {R : Type*} (a : R) [CommRing R] [IsDomain R] [DecidableEq R] :
nthRootsFinset n a = Multiset.toFinset (nthRoots n a) := by
unfold nthRootsFinset
convert rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_nthRootsFinset {n : ℕ} (h : 0 < n) (a : R) {x : R} :
x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a ↔ x ^ (n : ℕ) = a := by
classical
rw [nthRootsFinset_def, mem_toFinset, mem_nthRoots h]
@[simp]
theorem nthRootsFinset_zero (a : R) : nthRootsFinset 0 a = ∅ := by
classical simp [nthRootsFinset_def]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[MonoidHomClass F R S] {a : R} {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n (f a) := by
by_cases hn : n = 0
· simp [hn] at hx
· rw [mem_nthRootsFinset <| Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn, ← map_pow, (mem_nthRootsFinset
(Nat.pos_of_ne_zero hn) a).1 hx]
theorem map_mem_nthRootsFinset_one {S F : Type*} [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [FunLike F R S]
[RingHomClass F R S] {x : R} (hx : x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1) (f : F) :
f x ∈ nthRootsFinset n 1 := by
rw [← (map_one f)]
exact map_mem_nthRootsFinset hx _
theorem mul_mem_nthRootsFinset
{η₁ η₂ : R} {a₁ a₂ : R} (hη₁ : η₁ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₁) (hη₂ : η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n a₂) :
η₁ * η₂ ∈ nthRootsFinset n (a₁ * a₂) := by
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη₁
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos] at hη₁ hη₂ ⊢
rw [mul_pow, hη₁, hη₂]
theorem ne_zero_of_mem_nthRootsFinset {η : R} {a : R} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hη : η ∈ nthRootsFinset n a) :
η ≠ 0 := by
nontriviality R
rintro rfl
cases n with
| zero =>
simp only [nthRootsFinset_zero, not_mem_empty] at hη
| succ n =>
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset n.succ_pos, zero_pow n.succ_ne_zero] at hη
exact ha hη.symm
theorem one_mem_nthRootsFinset (hn : 0 < n) : 1 ∈ nthRootsFinset n (1 : R) := by
rw [mem_nthRootsFinset hn, one_pow]
end NthRoots
theorem zero_of_eval_zero [Infinite R] (p : R[X]) (h : ∀ x, p.eval x = 0) : p = 0 := by
classical
by_contra hp
refine @Fintype.false R _ ?_
exact ⟨p.roots.toFinset, fun x => Multiset.mem_toFinset.mpr ((mem_roots hp).mpr (h _))⟩
theorem funext [Infinite R] {p q : R[X]} (ext : ∀ r : R, p.eval r = q.eval r) : p = q := by
rw [← sub_eq_zero]
apply zero_of_eval_zero
intro x
rw [eval_sub, sub_eq_zero, ext]
variable [CommRing T]
/-- Given a polynomial `p` with coefficients in a ring `T` and a `T`-algebra `S`, `aroots p S` is
the multiset of roots of `p` regarded as a polynomial over `S`. -/
noncomputable abbrev aroots (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] : Multiset S :=
(p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots
theorem aroots_def (p : T[X]) (S) [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
p.aroots S = (p.map (algebraMap T S)).roots :=
rfl
theorem mem_aroots' [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} :
a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p.map (algebraMap T S) ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_roots', IsRoot.def, ← eval₂_eq_eval_map, aeval_def]
theorem mem_aroots [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p : T[X]} {a : S} : a ∈ p.aroots S ↔ p ≠ 0 ∧ aeval a p = 0 := by
rw [mem_aroots', Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff]
exact FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S
theorem aroots_mul [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
[NoZeroSMulDivisors T S] {p q : T[X]} (hpq : p * q ≠ 0) :
(p * q).aroots S = p.aroots S + q.aroots S := by
suffices map (algebraMap T S) p * map (algebraMap T S) q ≠ 0 by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_mul, roots_mul this]
rwa [← Polynomial.map_mul, Polynomial.map_ne_zero_iff
(FaithfulSMul.algebraMap_injective T S)]
@[simp]
theorem aroots_X_sub_C [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S]
(r : T) : aroots (X - C r) S = {algebraMap T S r} := by
rw [aroots_def, Polynomial.map_sub, map_X, map_C, roots_X_sub_C]
@[simp]
| theorem aroots_X [CommRing S] [IsDomain S] [Algebra T S] :
aroots (X : T[X]) S = {0} := by
rw [aroots_def, map_X, roots_X]
| Mathlib/Algebra/Polynomial/Roots.lean | 419 | 421 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Simon Hudon. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Simon Hudon
-/
import Mathlib.Control.Applicative
import Mathlib.Control.Traversable.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.List.Forall2
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Functor
/-!
# LawfulTraversable instances
This file provides instances of `LawfulTraversable` for types from the core library: `Option`,
`List` and `Sum`.
-/
universe u v
section Option
open Functor
variable {F G : Type u → Type u}
variable [Applicative F] [Applicative G]
variable [LawfulApplicative G]
theorem Option.id_traverse {α} (x : Option α) : Option.traverse (pure : α → Id α) x = x := by
cases x <;> rfl
theorem Option.comp_traverse {α β γ} (f : β → F γ) (g : α → G β) (x : Option α) :
Option.traverse (Comp.mk ∘ (f <$> ·) ∘ g) x =
Comp.mk (Option.traverse f <$> Option.traverse g x) := by
cases x <;> (simp! [functor_norm] <;> rfl)
theorem Option.traverse_eq_map_id {α β} (f : α → β) (x : Option α) :
Option.traverse ((pure : _ → Id _) ∘ f) x = (pure : _ → Id _) (f <$> x) := by cases x <;> rfl
variable (η : ApplicativeTransformation F G)
|
theorem Option.naturality [LawfulApplicative F] {α β} (f : α → F β) (x : Option α) :
| Mathlib/Control/Traversable/Instances.lean | 41 | 42 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Yury Kudryashov, Sébastien Gouëzel
-/
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Constructions.BorelSpace.Order
import Mathlib.MeasureTheory.Measure.Typeclasses.Probability
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.UniformMulAction
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.LeftRightLim
/-!
# Stieltjes measures on the real line
Consider a function `f : ℝ → ℝ` which is monotone and right-continuous. Then one can define a
corresponding measure, giving mass `f b - f a` to the interval `(a, b]`.
## Main definitions
* `StieltjesFunction` is a structure containing a function from `ℝ → ℝ`, together with the
assertions that it is monotone and right-continuous. To `f : StieltjesFunction`, one associates
a Borel measure `f.measure`.
* `f.measure_Ioc` asserts that `f.measure (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a)`
* `f.measure_Ioo` asserts that `f.measure (Ioo a b) = ofReal (leftLim f b - f a)`.
* `f.measure_Icc` and `f.measure_Ico` are analogous.
-/
noncomputable section
open Set Filter Function ENNReal NNReal Topology MeasureTheory
open ENNReal (ofReal)
/-! ### Basic properties of Stieltjes functions -/
/-- Bundled monotone right-continuous real functions, used to construct Stieltjes measures. -/
structure StieltjesFunction where
toFun : ℝ → ℝ
mono' : Monotone toFun
right_continuous' : ∀ x, ContinuousWithinAt toFun (Ici x) x
namespace StieltjesFunction
attribute [coe] toFun
instance instCoeFun : CoeFun StieltjesFunction fun _ => ℝ → ℝ :=
⟨toFun⟩
initialize_simps_projections StieltjesFunction (toFun → apply)
@[ext] lemma ext {f g : StieltjesFunction} (h : ∀ x, f x = g x) : f = g := by
exact (StieltjesFunction.mk.injEq ..).mpr (funext h)
variable (f : StieltjesFunction)
theorem mono : Monotone f :=
f.mono'
theorem right_continuous (x : ℝ) : ContinuousWithinAt f (Ici x) x :=
f.right_continuous' x
theorem rightLim_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) : Function.rightLim f x = f x := by
rw [← f.mono.continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_rightLim_eq, continuousWithinAt_Ioi_iff_Ici]
exact f.right_continuous' x
theorem iInf_Ioi_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) : ⨅ r : Ioi x, f r = f x := by
suffices Function.rightLim f x = ⨅ r : Ioi x, f r by rw [← this, f.rightLim_eq]
rw [f.mono.rightLim_eq_sInf, sInf_image']
rw [← neBot_iff]
infer_instance
theorem iInf_rat_gt_eq (f : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) :
⨅ r : { r' : ℚ // x < r' }, f r = f x := by
rw [← iInf_Ioi_eq f x]
refine (Real.iInf_Ioi_eq_iInf_rat_gt _ ?_ f.mono).symm
refine ⟨f x, fun y => ?_⟩
rintro ⟨y, hy_mem, rfl⟩
exact f.mono (le_of_lt hy_mem)
/-- The identity of `ℝ` as a Stieltjes function, used to construct Lebesgue measure. -/
@[simps]
protected def id : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := id
mono' _ _ := id
right_continuous' _ := continuousWithinAt_id
@[simp]
theorem id_leftLim (x : ℝ) : leftLim StieltjesFunction.id x = x :=
tendsto_nhds_unique (StieltjesFunction.id.mono.tendsto_leftLim x) <|
continuousAt_id.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds
instance instInhabited : Inhabited StieltjesFunction :=
⟨StieltjesFunction.id⟩
/-- Constant functions are Stieltjes function. -/
protected def const (c : ℝ) : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := fun _ ↦ c
mono' _ _ := by simp
right_continuous' _ := continuousWithinAt_const
@[simp] lemma const_apply (c x : ℝ) : (StieltjesFunction.const c) x = c := rfl
/-- The sum of two Stieltjes functions is a Stieltjes function. -/
protected def add (f g : StieltjesFunction) : StieltjesFunction where
toFun := fun x => f x + g x
mono' := f.mono.add g.mono
right_continuous' := fun x => (f.right_continuous x).add (g.right_continuous x)
instance : AddZeroClass StieltjesFunction where
add := StieltjesFunction.add
zero := StieltjesFunction.const 0
zero_add _ := ext fun _ ↦ zero_add _
add_zero _ := ext fun _ ↦ add_zero _
instance : AddCommMonoid StieltjesFunction where
nsmul n f := nsmulRec n f
add_assoc _ _ _ := ext fun _ ↦ add_assoc _ _ _
add_comm _ _ := ext fun _ ↦ add_comm _ _
__ := StieltjesFunction.instAddZeroClass
instance : Module ℝ≥0 StieltjesFunction where
smul c f := {
toFun := fun x ↦ c * f x
mono' := f.mono.const_mul c.2
right_continuous' := fun x ↦ (f.right_continuous x).const_smul c.1}
one_smul _ := ext fun _ ↦ one_mul _
mul_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ ↦ mul_assoc _ _ _
smul_zero _ := ext fun _ ↦ mul_zero _
smul_add _ _ _ := ext fun _ ↦ mul_add _ _ _
add_smul _ _ _ := ext fun _ ↦ add_mul _ _ _
zero_smul _ := ext fun _ ↦ zero_mul _
@[simp] lemma zero_apply (x : ℝ) : (0 : StieltjesFunction) x = 0 := rfl
@[simp] lemma add_apply (f g : StieltjesFunction) (x : ℝ) : (f + g) x = f x + g x := rfl
/-- If a function `f : ℝ → ℝ` is monotone, then the function mapping `x` to the right limit of `f`
at `x` is a Stieltjes function, i.e., it is monotone and right-continuous. -/
noncomputable def _root_.Monotone.stieltjesFunction {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Monotone f) :
StieltjesFunction where
toFun := rightLim f
mono' _ _ hxy := hf.rightLim hxy
right_continuous' := by
intro x s hs
obtain ⟨l, u, hlu, lus⟩ : ∃ l u : ℝ, rightLim f x ∈ Ioo l u ∧ Ioo l u ⊆ s :=
mem_nhds_iff_exists_Ioo_subset.1 hs
obtain ⟨y, xy, h'y⟩ : ∃ (y : ℝ), x < y ∧ Ioc x y ⊆ f ⁻¹' Ioo l u :=
mem_nhdsGT_iff_exists_Ioc_subset.1 (hf.tendsto_rightLim x (Ioo_mem_nhds hlu.1 hlu.2))
change ∀ᶠ y in 𝓝[≥] x, rightLim f y ∈ s
filter_upwards [Ico_mem_nhdsGE xy] with z hz
apply lus
refine ⟨hlu.1.trans_le (hf.rightLim hz.1), ?_⟩
obtain ⟨a, za, ay⟩ : ∃ a : ℝ, z < a ∧ a < y := exists_between hz.2
calc
rightLim f z ≤ f a := hf.rightLim_le za
_ < u := (h'y ⟨hz.1.trans_lt za, ay.le⟩).2
theorem _root_.Monotone.stieltjesFunction_eq {f : ℝ → ℝ} (hf : Monotone f) (x : ℝ) :
hf.stieltjesFunction x = rightLim f x :=
rfl
theorem countable_leftLim_ne (f : StieltjesFunction) : Set.Countable { x | leftLim f x ≠ f x } := by
refine Countable.mono ?_ f.mono.countable_not_continuousAt
intro x hx h'x
apply hx
exact tendsto_nhds_unique (f.mono.tendsto_leftLim x) (h'x.tendsto.mono_left nhdsWithin_le_nhds)
/-! ### The outer measure associated to a Stieltjes function -/
/-- Length of an interval. This is the largest monotone function which correctly measures all
intervals. -/
def length (s : Set ℝ) : ℝ≥0∞ :=
⨅ (a) (b) (_ : s ⊆ Ioc a b), ofReal (f b - f a)
@[simp]
theorem length_empty : f.length ∅ = 0 :=
nonpos_iff_eq_zero.1 <| iInf_le_of_le 0 <| iInf_le_of_le 0 <| by simp
@[simp]
theorem length_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.length (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
refine
le_antisymm (iInf_le_of_le a <| iInf₂_le b Subset.rfl)
(le_iInf fun a' => le_iInf fun b' => le_iInf fun h => ENNReal.coe_le_coe.2 ?_)
rcases le_or_lt b a with ab | ab
· rw [Real.toNNReal_of_nonpos (sub_nonpos.2 (f.mono ab))]
apply zero_le
obtain ⟨h₁, h₂⟩ := (Ioc_subset_Ioc_iff ab).1 h
exact Real.toNNReal_le_toNNReal (sub_le_sub (f.mono h₁) (f.mono h₂))
theorem length_mono {s₁ s₂ : Set ℝ} (h : s₁ ⊆ s₂) : f.length s₁ ≤ f.length s₂ :=
iInf_mono fun _ => biInf_mono fun _ => h.trans
open MeasureTheory
/-- The Stieltjes outer measure associated to a Stieltjes function. -/
protected def outer : OuterMeasure ℝ :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction f.length f.length_empty
theorem outer_le_length (s : Set ℝ) : f.outer s ≤ f.length s :=
OuterMeasure.ofFunction_le _
/-- If a compact interval `[a, b]` is covered by a union of open interval `(c i, d i)`, then
`f b - f a ≤ ∑ f (d i) - f (c i)`. This is an auxiliary technical statement to prove the same
statement for half-open intervals, the point of the current statement being that one can use
compactness to reduce it to a finite sum, and argue by induction on the size of the covering set. -/
theorem length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo {a b : ℝ} {c d : ℕ → ℝ} (ss : Icc a b ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (c i) (d i)) :
ofReal (f b - f a) ≤ ∑' i, ofReal (f (d i) - f (c i)) := by
suffices
∀ (s : Finset ℕ) (b), Icc a b ⊆ (⋃ i ∈ (s : Set ℕ), Ioo (c i) (d i)) →
(ofReal (f b - f a) : ℝ≥0∞) ≤ ∑ i ∈ s, ofReal (f (d i) - f (c i)) by
rcases isCompact_Icc.elim_finite_subcover_image
(fun (i : ℕ) (_ : i ∈ univ) => @isOpen_Ioo _ _ _ _ (c i) (d i)) (by simpa using ss) with
⟨s, _, hf, hs⟩
have e : ⋃ i ∈ (hf.toFinset : Set ℕ), Ioo (c i) (d i) = ⋃ i ∈ s, Ioo (c i) (d i) := by
simp only [Set.ext_iff, exists_prop, Finset.set_biUnion_coe, mem_iUnion, forall_const,
Finite.mem_toFinset]
rw [ENNReal.tsum_eq_iSup_sum]
refine le_trans ?_ (le_iSup _ hf.toFinset)
exact this hf.toFinset _ (by simpa only [e] )
clear ss b
refine fun s => Finset.strongInductionOn s fun s IH b cv => ?_
rcases le_total b a with ab | ab
· rw [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero.2 (sub_nonpos.2 (f.mono ab))]
exact zero_le _
have := cv ⟨ab, le_rfl⟩
simp only [Finset.mem_coe, gt_iff_lt, not_lt, mem_iUnion, mem_Ioo, exists_and_left,
exists_prop] at this
rcases this with ⟨i, cb, is, bd⟩
rw [← Finset.insert_erase is] at cv ⊢
rw [Finset.coe_insert, biUnion_insert] at cv
rw [Finset.sum_insert (Finset.not_mem_erase _ _)]
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (IH _ (Finset.erase_ssubset is) (c i) ?_) _)
· refine le_trans (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ?_) ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
exact sub_le_sub_right (f.mono bd.le) _
· rintro x ⟨h₁, h₂⟩
exact (cv ⟨h₁, le_trans h₂ (le_of_lt cb)⟩).resolve_left (mt And.left (not_lt_of_le h₂))
@[simp]
theorem outer_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.outer (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
/- It suffices to show that, if `(a, b]` is covered by sets `s i`, then `f b - f a` is bounded
by `∑ f.length (s i) + ε`. The difficulty is that `f.length` is expressed in terms of half-open
intervals, while we would like to have a compact interval covered by open intervals to use
compactness and finite sums, as provided by `length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo`. The trick is to use
the right-continuity of `f`. If `a'` is close enough to `a` on its right, then `[a', b]` is
still covered by the sets `s i` and moreover `f b - f a'` is very close to `f b - f a`
(up to `ε/2`).
Also, by definition one can cover `s i` by a half-closed interval `(p i, q i]` with `f`-length
very close to that of `s i` (within a suitably small `ε' i`, say). If one moves `q i` very
slightly to the right, then the `f`-length will change very little by right continuity, and we
will get an open interval `(p i, q' i)` covering `s i` with `f (q' i) - f (p i)` within `ε' i`
of the `f`-length of `s i`. -/
refine
le_antisymm
(by
rw [← f.length_Ioc]
apply outer_le_length)
(le_iInf₂ fun s hs => ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε εpos h => ?_)
let δ := ε / 2
have δpos : 0 < (δ : ℝ≥0∞) := by simpa [δ] using εpos.ne'
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable δpos.ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩
obtain ⟨a', ha', aa'⟩ : ∃ a', f a' - f a < δ ∧ a < a' := by
have A : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => f r - f a) (Ioi a) a := by
refine ContinuousWithinAt.sub ?_ continuousWithinAt_const
exact (f.right_continuous a).mono Ioi_subset_Ici_self
have B : f a - f a < δ := by rwa [sub_self, NNReal.coe_pos, ← ENNReal.coe_pos]
exact (((tendsto_order.1 A).2 _ B).and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists
have : ∀ i, ∃ p : ℝ × ℝ, s i ⊆ Ioo p.1 p.2 ∧
(ofReal (f p.2 - f p.1) : ℝ≥0∞) < f.length (s i) + ε' i := by
intro i
have hl :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right ((ENNReal.le_tsum i).trans_lt h).ne (ENNReal.coe_ne_zero.2 (ε'0 i).ne')
conv at hl =>
lhs
rw [length]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff, exists_prop] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨p, q', spq, hq'⟩
have : ContinuousWithinAt (fun r => ofReal (f r - f p)) (Ioi q') q' := by
apply ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.comp_continuousWithinAt
refine ContinuousWithinAt.sub ?_ continuousWithinAt_const
exact (f.right_continuous q').mono Ioi_subset_Ici_self
rcases (((tendsto_order.1 this).2 _ hq').and self_mem_nhdsWithin).exists with ⟨q, hq, q'q⟩
exact ⟨⟨p, q⟩, spq.trans (Ioc_subset_Ioo_right q'q), hq⟩
choose g hg using this
have I_subset : Icc a' b ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (g i).1 (g i).2 :=
calc
Icc a' b ⊆ Ioc a b := fun x hx => ⟨aa'.trans_le hx.1, hx.2⟩
_ ⊆ ⋃ i, s i := hs
_ ⊆ ⋃ i, Ioo (g i).1 (g i).2 := iUnion_mono fun i => (hg i).1
calc
ofReal (f b - f a) = ofReal (f b - f a' + (f a' - f a)) := by rw [sub_add_sub_cancel]
_ ≤ ofReal (f b - f a') + ofReal (f a' - f a) := ENNReal.ofReal_add_le
_ ≤ ∑' i, ofReal (f (g i).2 - f (g i).1) + ofReal δ :=
(add_le_add (f.length_subadditive_Icc_Ioo I_subset) (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal ha'.le))
_ ≤ ∑' i, (f.length (s i) + ε' i) + δ :=
(add_le_add (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => (hg i).2.le)
(by simp only [ENNReal.ofReal_coe_nnreal, le_rfl]))
_ = ∑' i, f.length (s i) + ∑' i, (ε' i : ℝ≥0∞) + δ := by rw [ENNReal.tsum_add]
_ ≤ ∑' i, f.length (s i) + δ + δ := add_le_add (add_le_add le_rfl hε.le) le_rfl
_ = ∑' i : ℕ, f.length (s i) + ε := by simp [δ, add_assoc, ENNReal.add_halves]
theorem measurableSet_Ioi {c : ℝ} : MeasurableSet[f.outer.caratheodory] (Ioi c) := by
refine OuterMeasure.ofFunction_caratheodory fun t => ?_
refine le_iInf fun a => le_iInf fun b => le_iInf fun h => ?_
refine
le_trans
(add_le_add (f.length_mono <| inter_subset_inter_left _ h)
(f.length_mono <| diff_subset_diff_left h)) ?_
rcases le_total a c with hac | hac <;> rcases le_total b c with hbc | hbc
· simp only [Ioc_inter_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, hac, hbc, le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty,
max_eq_right, min_eq_left, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_empty, zero_add, not_lt]
· simp only [hac, hbc, Ioc_inter_Ioi, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, min_eq_right,
← ENNReal.ofReal_add, f.mono hac, f.mono hbc, sub_nonneg,
sub_add_sub_cancel, le_refl,
max_eq_right]
· simp only [hbc, le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty, Ioc_inter_Ioi, min_eq_left, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_empty,
zero_add, or_true, le_sup_iff, f.length_Ioc, not_lt]
· simp only [hac, hbc, Ioc_inter_Ioi, Ioc_diff_Ioi, f.length_Ioc, min_eq_right,
le_refl, Ioc_eq_empty, add_zero, max_eq_left, f.length_empty, not_lt]
theorem outer_trim : f.outer.trim = f.outer := by
refine le_antisymm (fun s => ?_) (OuterMeasure.le_trim _)
rw [OuterMeasure.trim_eq_iInf]
refine le_iInf fun t => le_iInf fun ht => ENNReal.le_of_forall_pos_le_add fun ε ε0 h => ?_
rcases ENNReal.exists_pos_sum_of_countable (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 ε0).ne' ℕ with ⟨ε', ε'0, hε⟩
refine le_trans ?_ (add_le_add_left (le_of_lt hε) _)
rw [← ENNReal.tsum_add]
choose g hg using
show ∀ i, ∃ s, t i ⊆ s ∧ MeasurableSet s ∧ f.outer s ≤ f.length (t i) + ofReal (ε' i) by
intro i
have hl :=
ENNReal.lt_add_right ((ENNReal.le_tsum i).trans_lt h).ne (ENNReal.coe_pos.2 (ε'0 i)).ne'
conv at hl =>
lhs
rw [length]
simp only [iInf_lt_iff] at hl
rcases hl with ⟨a, b, h₁, h₂⟩
rw [← f.outer_Ioc] at h₂
exact ⟨_, h₁, measurableSet_Ioc, le_of_lt <| by simpa using h₂⟩
simp only [ofReal_coe_nnreal] at hg
apply iInf_le_of_le (iUnion g) _
apply iInf_le_of_le (ht.trans <| iUnion_mono fun i => (hg i).1) _
apply iInf_le_of_le (MeasurableSet.iUnion fun i => (hg i).2.1) _
exact le_trans (measure_iUnion_le _) (ENNReal.tsum_le_tsum fun i => (hg i).2.2)
theorem borel_le_measurable : borel ℝ ≤ f.outer.caratheodory := by
rw [borel_eq_generateFrom_Ioi]
refine MeasurableSpace.generateFrom_le ?_
simp +contextual [f.measurableSet_Ioi]
/-! ### The measure associated to a Stieltjes function -/
/-- The measure associated to a Stieltjes function, giving mass `f b - f a` to the
interval `(a, b]`. -/
protected irreducible_def measure : Measure ℝ where
toOuterMeasure := f.outer
m_iUnion _s hs := f.outer.iUnion_eq_of_caratheodory fun i => f.borel_le_measurable _ (hs i)
trim_le := f.outer_trim.le
@[simp]
theorem measure_Ioc (a b : ℝ) : f.measure (Ioc a b) = ofReal (f b - f a) := by
rw [StieltjesFunction.measure]
exact f.outer_Ioc a b
@[simp]
theorem measure_singleton (a : ℝ) : f.measure {a} = ofReal (f a - leftLim f a) := by
obtain ⟨u, u_mono, u_lt_a, u_lim⟩ :
∃ u : ℕ → ℝ, StrictMono u ∧ (∀ n : ℕ, u n < a) ∧ Tendsto u atTop (𝓝 a) :=
exists_seq_strictMono_tendsto a
have A : {a} = ⋂ n, Ioc (u n) a := by
refine Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => by simp [mem_singleton_iff.1 hx, u_lt_a]) fun x hx => ?_
simp? at hx says simp only [mem_iInter, mem_Ioc] at hx
have : a ≤ x := le_of_tendsto' u_lim fun n => (hx n).1.le
simp [le_antisymm this (hx 0).2]
have L1 : Tendsto (fun n => f.measure (Ioc (u n) a)) atTop (𝓝 (f.measure {a})) := by
rw [A]
refine tendsto_measure_iInter_atTop (fun n => nullMeasurableSet_Ioc)
(fun m n hmn => ?_) ?_
· exact Ioc_subset_Ioc_left (u_mono.monotone hmn)
· exact ⟨0, by simpa only [measure_Ioc] using ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top⟩
have L2 :
Tendsto (fun n => f.measure (Ioc (u n) a)) atTop (𝓝 (ofReal (f a - leftLim f a))) := by
simp only [measure_Ioc]
have : Tendsto (fun n => f (u n)) atTop (𝓝 (leftLim f a)) := by
apply (f.mono.tendsto_leftLim a).comp
exact
tendsto_nhdsWithin_of_tendsto_nhds_of_eventually_within _ u_lim
(Eventually.of_forall fun n => u_lt_a n)
exact ENNReal.continuous_ofReal.continuousAt.tendsto.comp (tendsto_const_nhds.sub this)
exact tendsto_nhds_unique L1 L2
@[simp]
theorem measure_Icc (a b : ℝ) : f.measure (Icc a b) = ofReal (f b - leftLim f a) := by
rcases le_or_lt a b with (hab | hab)
· have A : Disjoint {a} (Ioc a b) := by simp
simp [← Icc_union_Ioc_eq_Icc le_rfl hab, -singleton_union, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add,
f.mono.leftLim_le, measure_union A measurableSet_Ioc, f.mono hab]
· simp only [hab, measure_empty, Icc_eq_empty, not_le]
symm
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, f.mono.le_leftLim hab]
@[simp]
theorem measure_Ioo {a b : ℝ} : f.measure (Ioo a b) = ofReal (leftLim f b - f a) := by
rcases le_or_lt b a with (hab | hab)
· simp only [hab, measure_empty, Ioo_eq_empty, not_lt]
symm
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, f.mono.leftLim_le hab]
· have A : Disjoint (Ioo a b) {b} := by simp
have D : f b - f a = f b - leftLim f b + (leftLim f b - f a) := by abel
have := f.measure_Ioc a b
simp only [← Ioo_union_Icc_eq_Ioc hab le_rfl, measure_singleton,
measure_union A (measurableSet_singleton b), Icc_self] at this
rw [D, ENNReal.ofReal_add, add_comm] at this
· simpa only [ENNReal.add_right_inj ENNReal.ofReal_ne_top]
· simp only [f.mono.leftLim_le le_rfl, sub_nonneg]
· simp only [f.mono.le_leftLim hab, sub_nonneg]
@[simp]
theorem measure_Ico (a b : ℝ) : f.measure (Ico a b) = ofReal (leftLim f b - leftLim f a) := by
rcases le_or_lt b a with (hab | hab)
· simp only [hab, measure_empty, Ico_eq_empty, not_lt]
symm
simp [ENNReal.ofReal_eq_zero, f.mono.leftLim hab]
· have A : Disjoint {a} (Ioo a b) := by simp
simp [← Icc_union_Ioo_eq_Ico le_rfl hab, -singleton_union, hab.ne, f.mono.leftLim_le,
measure_union A measurableSet_Ioo, f.mono.le_leftLim hab, ← ENNReal.ofReal_add]
theorem measure_Iic {l : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 l)) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Iic x) = ofReal (f x - l) := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_measure_Ioc_atBot _ _) ?_
simp_rw [measure_Ioc]
exact ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal (Tendsto.const_sub _ hf)
lemma measure_Iio {l : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atBot (𝓝 l)) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Iio x) = ofReal (leftLim f x - l) := by
rw [← Iic_diff_right, measure_diff _ (nullMeasurableSet_singleton x), measure_singleton,
f.measure_Iic hf, ← ofReal_sub _ (sub_nonneg.mpr <| Monotone.leftLim_le f.mono' le_rfl)]
<;> simp
theorem measure_Ici {l : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 l)) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Ici x) = ofReal (l - leftLim f x) := by
refine tendsto_nhds_unique (tendsto_measure_Ico_atTop _ _) ?_
simp_rw [measure_Ico]
refine ENNReal.tendsto_ofReal (Tendsto.sub_const ?_ _)
have h_le1 : ∀ x, f (x - 1) ≤ leftLim f x := fun x => Monotone.le_leftLim f.mono (sub_one_lt x)
have h_le2 : ∀ x, leftLim f x ≤ f x := fun x => Monotone.leftLim_le f.mono le_rfl
refine tendsto_of_tendsto_of_tendsto_of_le_of_le (hf.comp ?_) hf h_le1 h_le2
rw [tendsto_atTop_atTop]
exact fun y => ⟨y + 1, fun z hyz => by rwa [le_sub_iff_add_le]⟩
lemma measure_Ioi {l : ℝ} (hf : Tendsto f atTop (𝓝 l)) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Ioi x) = ofReal (l - f x) := by
rw [← Ici_diff_left, measure_diff _ (nullMeasurableSet_singleton x), measure_singleton,
f.measure_Ici hf, ← ofReal_sub _ (sub_nonneg.mpr <| Monotone.leftLim_le f.mono' le_rfl)]
<;> simp
lemma measure_Ioi_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Ioi x) = ∞ := by
refine ENNReal.eq_top_of_forall_nnreal_le fun r ↦ ?_
obtain ⟨N, hN⟩ := eventually_atTop.mp (tendsto_atTop.mp hf (r + f x))
exact (f.measure_Ioc x (max x N) ▸ ENNReal.coe_nnreal_eq r ▸ (ENNReal.ofReal_le_ofReal <|
| le_tsub_of_add_le_right <| hN _ (le_max_right x N))).trans (measure_mono Ioc_subset_Ioi_self)
lemma measure_Ici_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop (hf : Tendsto f atTop atTop) (x : ℝ) :
f.measure (Ici x) = ∞ := by
rw [← top_le_iff, ← f.measure_Ioi_of_tendsto_atTop_atTop hf x]
| Mathlib/MeasureTheory/Measure/Stieltjes.lean | 465 | 469 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Yaël Dillies, Bhavik Mehta
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Extreme
import Mathlib.Analysis.Convex.Function
import Mathlib.Topology.Algebra.Module.LinearMap
import Mathlib.Topology.Order.OrderClosed
/-!
# Exposed sets
This file defines exposed sets and exposed points for sets in a real vector space.
An exposed subset of `A` is a subset of `A` that is the set of all maximal points of a functional
(a continuous linear map `E → 𝕜`) over `A`. By convention, `∅` is an exposed subset of all sets.
This allows for better functoriality of the definition (the intersection of two exposed subsets is
exposed, faces of a polytope form a bounded lattice).
This is an analytic notion of "being on the side of". It is stronger than being extreme (see
`IsExposed.isExtreme`), but weaker (for exposed points) than being a vertex.
An exposed set of `A` is sometimes called a "face of `A`", but we decided to reserve this
terminology to the more specific notion of a face of a polytope (sometimes hopefully soon out
on mathlib!).
## Main declarations
* `IsExposed 𝕜 A B`: States that `B` is an exposed set of `A` (in the literature, `A` is often
implicit).
* `IsExposed.isExtreme`: An exposed set is also extreme.
## References
See chapter 8 of [Barry Simon, *Convexity*][simon2011]
## TODO
Prove lemmas relating exposed sets and points to the intrinsic frontier.
-/
open Affine Set
section PreorderSemiring
variable (𝕜 : Type*) {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Semiring 𝕜] [Preorder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [Module 𝕜 E] {A B : Set E}
/-- A set `B` is exposed with respect to `A` iff it maximizes some functional over `A` (and contains
all points maximizing it). Written `IsExposed 𝕜 A B`. -/
def IsExposed (A B : Set E) : Prop :=
B.Nonempty → ∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, B = { x ∈ A | ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x }
end PreorderSemiring
section OrderedRing
variable {𝕜 : Type*} {E : Type*} [TopologicalSpace 𝕜] [Ring 𝕜] [PartialOrder 𝕜] [AddCommMonoid E]
[TopologicalSpace E] [Module 𝕜 E] {l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜} {A B C : Set E} {x : E}
/-- A useful way to build exposed sets from intersecting `A` with half-spaces (modelled by an
inequality with a functional). -/
def ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed (l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜) (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x }
theorem ContinuousLinearMap.toExposed.isExposed : IsExposed 𝕜 A (l.toExposed A) := fun _ => ⟨l, rfl⟩
theorem isExposed_empty : IsExposed 𝕜 A ∅ := fun ⟨_, hx⟩ => by
exfalso
exact hx
namespace IsExposed
protected theorem subset (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) : B ⊆ A := by
rintro x hx
obtain ⟨_, rfl⟩ := hAB ⟨x, hx⟩
exact hx.1
@[refl]
protected theorem refl (A : Set E) : IsExposed 𝕜 A A := fun ⟨_, _⟩ =>
⟨0, Subset.antisymm (fun _ hx => ⟨hx, fun _ _ => le_refl 0⟩) fun _ hx => hx.1⟩
protected theorem antisymm (hB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hA : IsExposed 𝕜 B A) : A = B :=
hA.subset.antisymm hB.subset
/-! `IsExposed` is *not* transitive: Consider a (topologically) open cube with vertices
`A₀₀₀, ..., A₁₁₁` and add to it the triangle `A₀₀₀A₀₀₁A₀₁₀`. Then `A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` is an exposed subset
of `A₀₀₀A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` which is an exposed subset of the cube, but `A₀₀₁A₀₁₀` is not itself an exposed
subset of the cube. -/
protected theorem mono (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) (hBA : B ⊆ A) (hCB : C ⊆ B) : IsExposed 𝕜 B C := by
rintro ⟨w, hw⟩
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hw⟩
exact ⟨l, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨hCB hx, fun y hy => hx.2 y (hBA hy)⟩) fun x hx =>
⟨hBA hx.1, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans (hx.2 w (hCB hw))⟩⟩
/-- If `B` is a nonempty exposed subset of `A`, then `B` is the intersection of `A` with some closed
half-space. The converse is *not* true. It would require that the corresponding open half-space
doesn't intersect `A`. -/
theorem eq_inter_halfSpace' {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hB : B.Nonempty) :
∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∃ a, B = { x ∈ A | a ≤ l x } := by
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hAB hB
obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := hB
exact ⟨l, l w, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨hx.1, hx.2 w hw.1⟩) fun x hx =>
⟨hx.1, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans hx.2⟩⟩
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-12")] alias eq_inter_halfspace' := eq_inter_halfSpace'
/-- For nontrivial `𝕜`, if `B` is an exposed subset of `A`, then `B` is the intersection of `A` with
some closed half-space. The converse is *not* true. It would require that the corresponding open
half-space doesn't intersect `A`. -/
theorem eq_inter_halfSpace [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] [Nontrivial 𝕜] {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) :
∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∃ a, B = { x ∈ A | a ≤ l x } := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· refine ⟨0, 1, ?_⟩
rw [eq_comm, eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem]
rintro x ⟨-, h⟩
rw [ContinuousLinearMap.zero_apply] at h
have : ¬(1 : 𝕜) ≤ 0 := not_le_of_lt zero_lt_one
contradiction
exact hAB.eq_inter_halfSpace' hB
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-12")] alias eq_inter_halfspace := eq_inter_halfSpace
protected theorem inter [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜] {A B C : Set E} (hB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B)
(hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) : IsExposed 𝕜 A (B ∩ C) := by
rintro ⟨w, hwB, hwC⟩
obtain ⟨l₁, rfl⟩ := hB ⟨w, hwB⟩
obtain ⟨l₂, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hwC⟩
refine ⟨l₁ + l₂, Subset.antisymm ?_ ?_⟩
· rintro x ⟨⟨hxA, hxB⟩, ⟨-, hxC⟩⟩
exact ⟨hxA, fun z hz => add_le_add (hxB z hz) (hxC z hz)⟩
rintro x ⟨hxA, hx⟩
refine ⟨⟨hxA, fun y hy => ?_⟩, hxA, fun y hy => ?_⟩
· exact
(add_le_add_iff_right (l₂ x)).1 ((add_le_add (hwB.2 y hy) (hwC.2 x hxA)).trans (hx w hwB.1))
· exact
(add_le_add_iff_left (l₁ x)).1 (le_trans (add_le_add (hwB.2 x hxA) (hwC.2 y hy)) (hx w hwB.1))
theorem sInter [IsOrderedRing 𝕜] [ContinuousAdd 𝕜] {F : Finset (Set E)} (hF : F.Nonempty)
(hAF : ∀ B ∈ F, IsExposed 𝕜 A B) : IsExposed 𝕜 A (⋂₀ F) := by
classical
induction F using Finset.induction with
| empty => exfalso; exact Finset.not_nonempty_empty hF
| insert C F _ hF' =>
rw [Finset.coe_insert, sInter_insert]
obtain rfl | hFnemp := F.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· rw [Finset.coe_empty, sInter_empty, inter_univ]
exact hAF C (Finset.mem_singleton_self C)
· exact (hAF C (Finset.mem_insert_self C F)).inter
(hF' hFnemp fun B hB => hAF B (Finset.mem_insert_of_mem hB))
theorem inter_left (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 A C) (hCB : C ⊆ B) : IsExposed 𝕜 (A ∩ B) C := by
rintro ⟨w, hw⟩
obtain ⟨l, rfl⟩ := hC ⟨w, hw⟩
exact ⟨l, Subset.antisymm (fun x hx => ⟨⟨hx.1, hCB hx⟩, fun y hy => hx.2 y hy.1⟩)
fun x ⟨⟨hxC, _⟩, hx⟩ => ⟨hxC, fun y hy => (hw.2 y hy).trans (hx w ⟨hC.subset hw, hCB hw⟩)⟩⟩
theorem inter_right (hC : IsExposed 𝕜 B C) (hCA : C ⊆ A) : IsExposed 𝕜 (A ∩ B) C := by
rw [inter_comm]
exact hC.inter_left hCA
protected theorem isClosed [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] {A B : Set E} (hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B)
(hA : IsClosed A) : IsClosed B := by
obtain rfl | hB := B.eq_empty_or_nonempty
· simp
obtain ⟨l, a, rfl⟩ := hAB.eq_inter_halfSpace' hB
exact hA.isClosed_le continuousOn_const l.continuous.continuousOn
protected theorem isCompact [OrderClosedTopology 𝕜] [T2Space E] {A B : Set E}
(hAB : IsExposed 𝕜 A B) (hA : IsCompact A) : IsCompact B :=
hA.of_isClosed_subset (hAB.isClosed hA.isClosed) hAB.subset
end IsExposed
variable (𝕜) in
/-- A point is exposed with respect to `A` iff there exists a hyperplane whose intersection with
`A` is exactly that point. -/
| def Set.exposedPoints (A : Set E) : Set E :=
{ x ∈ A | ∃ l : E →L[𝕜] 𝕜, ∀ y ∈ A, l y ≤ l x ∧ (l x ≤ l y → y = x) }
| Mathlib/Analysis/Convex/Exposed.lean | 176 | 178 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Kevin Kappelmann
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Ring
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Floor.Semiring
deprecated_module (since := "2025-04-13")
| Mathlib/Algebra/Order/Floor.lean | 508 | 510 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Multiset.ZeroCons
/-!
# Basic results on multisets
-/
-- No algebra should be required
assert_not_exists Monoid
universe v
open List Subtype Nat Function
variable {α : Type*} {β : Type v} {γ : Type*}
namespace Multiset
/-! ### `Multiset.toList` -/
section ToList
/-- Produces a list of the elements in the multiset using choice. -/
noncomputable def toList (s : Multiset α) :=
s.out
@[simp, norm_cast]
theorem coe_toList (s : Multiset α) : (s.toList : Multiset α) = s :=
s.out_eq'
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_nil {s : Multiset α} : s.toList = [] ↔ s = 0 := by
rw [← coe_eq_zero, coe_toList]
theorem empty_toList {s : Multiset α} : s.toList.isEmpty ↔ s = 0 := by simp
@[simp]
theorem toList_zero : (Multiset.toList 0 : List α) = [] :=
toList_eq_nil.mpr rfl
@[simp]
theorem mem_toList {a : α} {s : Multiset α} : a ∈ s.toList ↔ a ∈ s := by
rw [← mem_coe, coe_toList]
@[simp]
theorem toList_eq_singleton_iff {a : α} {m : Multiset α} : m.toList = [a] ↔ m = {a} := by
rw [← perm_singleton, ← coe_eq_coe, coe_toList, coe_singleton]
@[simp]
theorem toList_singleton (a : α) : ({a} : Multiset α).toList = [a] :=
Multiset.toList_eq_singleton_iff.2 rfl
@[simp]
theorem length_toList (s : Multiset α) : s.toList.length = card s := by
rw [← coe_card, coe_toList]
end ToList
/-! ### Induction principles -/
/-- The strong induction principle for multisets. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (ih : ∀ s, (∀ t < s, p t) → p s) :
p s :=
(ih s) fun t _h =>
strongInductionOn t ih
termination_by card s
decreasing_by exact card_lt_card _h
theorem strongInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) (H) :
@strongInductionOn _ p s H = H s fun t _h => @strongInductionOn _ p t H := by
rw [strongInductionOn]
@[elab_as_elim]
theorem case_strongInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Prop} (s : Multiset α) (h₀ : p 0)
(h₁ : ∀ a s, (∀ t ≤ s, p t) → p (a ::ₘ s)) : p s :=
Multiset.strongInductionOn s fun s =>
Multiset.induction_on s (fun _ => h₀) fun _a _s _ ih =>
(h₁ _ _) fun _t h => ih _ <| lt_of_le_of_lt h <| lt_cons_self _ _
/-- Suppose that, given that `p t` can be defined on all supersets of `s` of cardinality less than
`n`, one knows how to define `p s`. Then one can inductively define `p s` for all multisets `s` of
cardinality less than `n`, starting from multisets of card `n` and iterating. This
can be used either to define data, or to prove properties. -/
def strongDownwardInduction {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
card s ≤ n → p s :=
H s fun {t} ht _h =>
strongDownwardInduction H t ht
termination_by n - card s
decreasing_by simp_wf; have := (card_lt_card _h); omega
theorem strongDownwardInduction_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁)
(s : Multiset α) :
strongDownwardInduction H s = H s fun ht _hst => strongDownwardInduction H _ ht := by
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
/-- Analogue of `strongDownwardInduction` with order of arguments swapped. -/
@[elab_as_elim]
def strongDownwardInductionOn {p : Multiset α → Sort*} {n : ℕ} :
∀ s : Multiset α,
(∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) →
card s ≤ n → p s :=
fun s H => strongDownwardInduction H s
theorem strongDownwardInductionOn_eq {p : Multiset α → Sort*} (s : Multiset α) {n : ℕ}
(H : ∀ t₁, (∀ {t₂ : Multiset α}, card t₂ ≤ n → t₁ < t₂ → p t₂) → card t₁ ≤ n → p t₁) :
s.strongDownwardInductionOn H = H s fun {t} ht _h => t.strongDownwardInductionOn H ht := by
dsimp only [strongDownwardInductionOn]
rw [strongDownwardInduction]
section Choose
variable (p : α → Prop) [DecidablePred p] (l : Multiset α)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `chooseX p l hp` returns
that `a` together with proofs of `a ∈ l` and `p a`. -/
def chooseX : ∀ _hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a, { a // a ∈ l ∧ p a } :=
Quotient.recOn l (fun l' ex_unique => List.chooseX p l' (ExistsUnique.exists ex_unique))
(by
intros a b _
funext hp
suffices all_equal : ∀ x y : { t // t ∈ b ∧ p t }, x = y by
apply all_equal
rintro ⟨x, px⟩ ⟨y, py⟩
rcases hp with ⟨z, ⟨_z_mem_l, _pz⟩, z_unique⟩
congr
calc
x = z := z_unique x px
_ = y := (z_unique y py).symm
)
/-- Given a proof `hp` that there exists a unique `a ∈ l` such that `p a`, `choose p l hp` returns
that `a`. -/
def choose (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : α :=
chooseX p l hp
theorem choose_spec (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l ∧ p (choose p l hp) :=
(chooseX p l hp).property
theorem choose_mem (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : choose p l hp ∈ l :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).1
theorem choose_property (hp : ∃! a, a ∈ l ∧ p a) : p (choose p l hp) :=
(choose_spec _ _ _).2
end Choose
variable (α) in
/-- The equivalence between lists and multisets of a subsingleton type. -/
def subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] : List α ≃ Multiset α where
toFun := ofList
invFun :=
(Quot.lift id) fun (a b : List α) (h : a ~ b) =>
(List.ext_get h.length_eq) fun _ _ _ => Subsingleton.elim _ _
left_inv _ := rfl
right_inv m := Quot.inductionOn m fun _ => rfl
@[simp]
theorem coe_subsingletonEquiv [Subsingleton α] :
(subsingletonEquiv α : List α → Multiset α) = ofList :=
rfl
section SizeOf
set_option linter.deprecated false in
@[deprecated "Deprecated without replacement." (since := "2025-02-07")]
theorem sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem [SizeOf α] {x : α} {s : Multiset α} (hx : x ∈ s) :
SizeOf.sizeOf x < SizeOf.sizeOf s := by
induction s using Quot.inductionOn
exact List.sizeOf_lt_sizeOf_of_mem hx
end SizeOf
end Multiset
| Mathlib/Data/Multiset/Basic.lean | 362 | 364 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2018 Mario Carneiro. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.CauSeq.Completion
import Mathlib.Algebra.Order.Ring.Rat
import Mathlib.Data.Rat.Cast.Defs
/-!
# Real numbers from Cauchy sequences
This file defines `ℝ` as the type of equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational numbers.
This choice is motivated by how easy it is to prove that `ℝ` is a commutative ring, by simply
lifting everything to `ℚ`.
The facts that the real numbers are an Archimedean floor ring,
and a conditionally complete linear order,
have been deferred to the file `Mathlib/Data/Real/Archimedean.lean`,
in order to keep the imports here simple.
The fact that the real numbers are a (trivial) *-ring has similarly been deferred to
`Mathlib/Data/Real/Star.lean`.
-/
assert_not_exists Finset Module Submonoid FloorRing
/-- The type `ℝ` of real numbers constructed as equivalence classes of Cauchy sequences of rational
numbers. -/
structure Real where ofCauchy ::
/-- The underlying Cauchy completion -/
cauchy : CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ)
@[inherit_doc]
notation "ℝ" => Real
namespace CauSeq.Completion
-- this can't go in `Data.Real.CauSeqCompletion` as the structure on `ℚ` isn't available
@[simp]
theorem ofRat_rat {abv : ℚ → ℚ} [IsAbsoluteValue abv] (q : ℚ) :
ofRat (q : ℚ) = (q : Cauchy abv) :=
rfl
end CauSeq.Completion
namespace Real
open CauSeq CauSeq.Completion
variable {x : ℝ}
theorem ext_cauchy_iff : ∀ {x y : Real}, x = y ↔ x.cauchy = y.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by rw [ofCauchy.injEq]
theorem ext_cauchy {x y : Real} : x.cauchy = y.cauchy → x = y :=
ext_cauchy_iff.2
/-- The real numbers are isomorphic to the quotient of Cauchy sequences on the rationals. -/
def equivCauchy : ℝ ≃ CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
⟨Real.cauchy, Real.ofCauchy, fun ⟨_⟩ => rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩
-- irreducible doesn't work for instances: https://github.com/leanprover-community/lean/issues/511
private irreducible_def zero : ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
private irreducible_def one : ℝ :=
⟨1⟩
private irreducible_def add : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a + b⟩
private irreducible_def neg : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨-a⟩
private irreducible_def mul : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => ⟨a * b⟩
private noncomputable irreducible_def inv' : ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨a⟩ => ⟨a⁻¹⟩
instance : Zero ℝ :=
⟨zero⟩
instance : One ℝ :=
⟨one⟩
instance : Add ℝ :=
⟨add⟩
instance : Neg ℝ :=
⟨neg⟩
instance : Mul ℝ :=
⟨mul⟩
instance : Sub ℝ :=
⟨fun a b => a + -b⟩
noncomputable instance : Inv ℝ :=
⟨inv'⟩
theorem ofCauchy_zero : (⟨0⟩ : ℝ) = 0 :=
zero_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_one : (⟨1⟩ : ℝ) = 1 :=
one_def.symm
theorem ofCauchy_add (a b) : (⟨a + b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ + ⟨b⟩ :=
(add_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_neg (a) : (⟨-a⟩ : ℝ) = -⟨a⟩ :=
(neg_def _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_sub (a b) : (⟨a - b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ - ⟨b⟩ := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ofCauchy_add, ofCauchy_neg]
rfl
theorem ofCauchy_mul (a b) : (⟨a * b⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨a⟩ * ⟨b⟩ :=
(mul_def _ _).symm
theorem ofCauchy_inv {f} : (⟨f⁻¹⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨f⟩⁻¹ :=
show _ = inv' _ by rw [inv']
theorem cauchy_zero : (0 : ℝ).cauchy = 0 :=
show zero.cauchy = 0 by rw [zero_def]
theorem cauchy_one : (1 : ℝ).cauchy = 1 :=
show one.cauchy = 1 by rw [one_def]
theorem cauchy_add : ∀ a b, (a + b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy + b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (add _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [add_def]
theorem cauchy_neg : ∀ a, (-a : ℝ).cauchy = -a.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩ => show (neg _).cauchy = _ by rw [neg_def]
theorem cauchy_mul : ∀ a b, (a * b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy * b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => show (mul _ _).cauchy = _ by rw [mul_def]
theorem cauchy_sub : ∀ a b, (a - b : ℝ).cauchy = a.cauchy - b.cauchy
| ⟨a⟩, ⟨b⟩ => by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← cauchy_neg, ← cauchy_add]
rfl
theorem cauchy_inv : ∀ f, (f⁻¹ : ℝ).cauchy = f.cauchy⁻¹
| ⟨f⟩ => show (inv' _).cauchy = _ by rw [inv']
instance instNatCast : NatCast ℝ where natCast n := ⟨n⟩
instance instIntCast : IntCast ℝ where intCast z := ⟨z⟩
instance instNNRatCast : NNRatCast ℝ where nnratCast q := ⟨q⟩
instance instRatCast : RatCast ℝ where ratCast q := ⟨q⟩
lemma ofCauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (⟨n⟩ : ℝ) = n := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (⟨z⟩ : ℝ) = z := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma ofCauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (⟨q⟩ : ℝ) = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_natCast (n : ℕ) : (n : ℝ).cauchy = n := rfl
lemma cauchy_intCast (z : ℤ) : (z : ℝ).cauchy = z := rfl
lemma cauchy_nnratCast (q : ℚ≥0) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
lemma cauchy_ratCast (q : ℚ) : (q : ℝ).cauchy = q := rfl
instance commRing : CommRing ℝ where
natCast n := ⟨n⟩
intCast z := ⟨z⟩
zero := (0 : ℝ)
one := (1 : ℝ)
mul := (· * ·)
add := (· + ·)
neg := @Neg.neg ℝ _
sub := @Sub.sub ℝ _
npow := @npowRec ℝ ⟨1⟩ ⟨(· * ·)⟩
nsmul := @nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩
zsmul := @zsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩ ⟨@Neg.neg ℝ _⟩ (@nsmulRec ℝ ⟨0⟩ ⟨(· + ·)⟩)
add_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
zero_add a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_zero]
add_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_comm]
add_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, add_assoc]
mul_zero a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
zero_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_zero]
mul_one a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
one_mul a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_mul, cauchy_one]
mul_comm a b := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_comm]
mul_assoc a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_mul, mul_assoc]
left_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, mul_add]
right_distrib a b c := by apply ext_cauchy; simp only [cauchy_add, cauchy_mul, add_mul]
neg_add_cancel a := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_add, cauchy_neg, cauchy_zero]
natCast_zero := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_zero]
natCast_succ n := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_one, cauchy_add]
intCast_negSucc z := by apply ext_cauchy; simp [cauchy_neg, cauchy_natCast]
/-- `Real.equivCauchy` as a ring equivalence. -/
@[simps]
def ringEquivCauchy : ℝ ≃+* CauSeq.Completion.Cauchy (abs : ℚ → ℚ) :=
{ equivCauchy with
toFun := cauchy
invFun := ofCauchy
map_add' := cauchy_add
map_mul' := cauchy_mul }
/-! Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution.
These short-circuits have an additional property of ensuring that a computable path is found; if
`Field ℝ` is found first, then decaying it to these typeclasses would result in a `noncomputable`
version of them. -/
instance instRing : Ring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance semiring : Semiring ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : MonoidWithZero ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddGroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddLeftCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddRightCancelSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddCommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : AddSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommMonoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Monoid ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : CommSemigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Semigroup ℝ := by infer_instance
instance : Inhabited ℝ :=
⟨0⟩
/-- Make a real number from a Cauchy sequence of rationals (by taking the equivalence class). -/
def mk (x : CauSeq ℚ abs) : ℝ :=
⟨CauSeq.Completion.mk x⟩
theorem mk_eq {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f = mk g ↔ f ≈ g :=
ext_cauchy_iff.trans CauSeq.Completion.mk_eq
private irreducible_def lt : ℝ → ℝ → Prop
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ =>
(Quotient.liftOn₂ x y (· < ·)) fun _ _ _ _ hf hg =>
propext <|
⟨fun h => lt_of_eq_of_lt (Setoid.symm hf) (lt_of_lt_of_eq h hg), fun h =>
lt_of_eq_of_lt hf (lt_of_lt_of_eq h (Setoid.symm hg))⟩
instance : LT ℝ :=
⟨lt⟩
theorem lt_cauchy {f g} : (⟨⟦f⟧⟩ : ℝ) < ⟨⟦g⟧⟩ ↔ f < g :=
show lt _ _ ↔ _ by rw [lt_def]; rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_lt {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f < mk g ↔ f < g :=
lt_cauchy
theorem mk_zero : mk 0 = 0 := by rw [← ofCauchy_zero]; rfl
theorem mk_one : mk 1 = 1 := by rw [← ofCauchy_one]; rfl
theorem mk_add {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f + g) = mk f + mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_add]
theorem mk_mul {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (f * g) = mk f * mk g := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_mul]
theorem mk_neg {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk (-f) = -mk f := by simp [mk, ← ofCauchy_neg]
@[simp]
theorem mk_pos {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : 0 < mk f ↔ Pos f := by
rw [← mk_zero, mk_lt]
exact iff_of_eq (congr_arg Pos (sub_zero f))
lemma mk_const {x : ℚ} : mk (const abs x) = x := rfl
private irreducible_def le (x y : ℝ) : Prop :=
x < y ∨ x = y
instance : LE ℝ :=
⟨le⟩
private theorem le_def' {x y : ℝ} : x ≤ y ↔ x < y ∨ x = y :=
iff_of_eq <| le_def _ _
@[simp]
theorem mk_le {f g : CauSeq ℚ abs} : mk f ≤ mk g ↔ f ≤ g := by
simp only [le_def', mk_lt, mk_eq]; rfl
@[elab_as_elim]
protected theorem ind_mk {C : Real → Prop} (x : Real) (h : ∀ y, C (mk y)) : C x := by
obtain ⟨x⟩ := x
induction x using Quot.induction_on
exact h _
theorem add_lt_add_iff_left {a b : ℝ} (c : ℝ) : c + a < c + b ↔ a < b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp only [mk_lt, ← mk_add]
show Pos _ ↔ Pos _; rw [add_sub_add_left_eq_sub]
instance partialOrder : PartialOrder ℝ where
le := (· ≤ ·)
lt := (· < ·)
lt_iff_le_not_le a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa using lt_iff_le_not_le
le_refl a := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
rw [mk_le]
le_trans a b c := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simpa using le_trans
le_antisymm a b := by
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa [mk_eq] using CauSeq.le_antisymm
instance : Preorder ℝ := by infer_instance
theorem ratCast_lt {x y : ℚ} : (x : ℝ) < (y : ℝ) ↔ x < y := by
rw [← mk_const, ← mk_const, mk_lt]
exact const_lt
protected theorem zero_lt_one : (0 : ℝ) < 1 := by
convert ratCast_lt.2 zero_lt_one <;> simp [← ofCauchy_ratCast, ofCauchy_one, ofCauchy_zero]
protected theorem fact_zero_lt_one : Fact ((0 : ℝ) < 1) :=
⟨Real.zero_lt_one⟩
instance instNontrivial : Nontrivial ℝ where
exists_pair_ne := ⟨0, 1, Real.zero_lt_one.ne⟩
instance instZeroLEOneClass : ZeroLEOneClass ℝ where
zero_le_one := le_of_lt Real.zero_lt_one
instance instIsOrderedAddMonoid : IsOrderedAddMonoid ℝ where
add_le_add_left := by
simp only [le_iff_eq_or_lt]
rintro a b ⟨rfl, h⟩
· simp only [lt_self_iff_false, or_false, forall_const]
· exact fun c => Or.inr ((add_lt_add_iff_left c).2 ‹_›)
instance instIsStrictOrderedRing : IsStrictOrderedRing ℝ :=
.of_mul_pos fun a b ↦ by
induction' a using Real.ind_mk with a
induction' b using Real.ind_mk with b
simpa only [mk_lt, mk_pos, ← mk_mul] using CauSeq.mul_pos
instance instIsOrderedRing : IsOrderedRing ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance instIsOrderedCancelAddMonoid : IsOrderedCancelAddMonoid ℝ :=
inferInstance
private irreducible_def sup : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊔ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => sup_equiv_sup hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Max ℝ :=
⟨sup⟩
theorem ofCauchy_sup (a b) : (⟨⟦a ⊔ b⟧⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨⟦a⟧⟩ ⊔ ⟨⟦b⟧⟩ :=
show _ = sup _ _ by
rw [sup_def]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_sup (a b) : (mk (a ⊔ b) : ℝ) = mk a ⊔ mk b :=
ofCauchy_sup _ _
private irreducible_def inf : ℝ → ℝ → ℝ
| ⟨x⟩, ⟨y⟩ => ⟨Quotient.map₂ (· ⊓ ·) (fun _ _ hx _ _ hy => inf_equiv_inf hx hy) x y⟩
instance : Min ℝ :=
⟨inf⟩
theorem ofCauchy_inf (a b) : (⟨⟦a ⊓ b⟧⟩ : ℝ) = ⟨⟦a⟧⟩ ⊓ ⟨⟦b⟧⟩ :=
show _ = inf _ _ by
rw [inf_def]
rfl
@[simp]
theorem mk_inf (a b) : (mk (a ⊓ b) : ℝ) = mk a ⊓ mk b :=
ofCauchy_inf _ _
instance : DistribLattice ℝ :=
{ Real.partialOrder with
sup := (· ⊔ ·)
le := (· ≤ ·)
le_sup_left := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_sup_left
le_sup_right := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_sup_right
sup_le := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp_rw [← mk_sup, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.sup_le
inf := (· ⊓ ·)
inf_le_left := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.inf_le_left
inf_le_right := by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
dsimp only; rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.inf_le_right
le_inf := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
simp_rw [← mk_inf, mk_le]
exact CauSeq.le_inf
le_sup_inf := by
intros a b c
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
induction c using Real.ind_mk
apply Eq.le
simp only [← mk_sup, ← mk_inf]
exact congr_arg mk (CauSeq.sup_inf_distrib_left ..).symm }
-- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
instance lattice : Lattice ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance : SemilatticeInf ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance : SemilatticeSup ℝ :=
inferInstance
instance leTotal_R : IsTotal ℝ (· ≤ ·) :=
⟨by
intros a b
induction a using Real.ind_mk
induction b using Real.ind_mk
simpa using CauSeq.le_total ..⟩
open scoped Classical in
noncomputable instance linearOrder : LinearOrder ℝ :=
Lattice.toLinearOrder ℝ
instance : IsDomain ℝ := IsStrictOrderedRing.isDomain
noncomputable instance instDivInvMonoid : DivInvMonoid ℝ where
lemma ofCauchy_div (f g) : (⟨f / g⟩ : ℝ) = (⟨f⟩ : ℝ) / (⟨g⟩ : ℝ) := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, ofCauchy_mul, ofCauchy_inv]
noncomputable instance field : Field ℝ where
mul_inv_cancel := by
rintro ⟨a⟩ h
rw [mul_comm]
simp only [← ofCauchy_inv, ← ofCauchy_mul, ← ofCauchy_one, ← ofCauchy_zero,
Ne, ofCauchy.injEq] at *
exact CauSeq.Completion.inv_mul_cancel h
inv_zero := by simp [← ofCauchy_zero, ← ofCauchy_inv]
nnqsmul := _
nnqsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
qsmul := _
qsmul_def := fun _ _ => rfl
nnratCast_def q := by
rw [← ofCauchy_nnratCast, NNRat.cast_def, ofCauchy_div, ofCauchy_natCast, ofCauchy_natCast]
ratCast_def q := by
rw [← ofCauchy_ratCast, Rat.cast_def, ofCauchy_div, ofCauchy_natCast, ofCauchy_intCast]
-- Extra instances to short-circuit type class resolution
noncomputable instance : DivisionRing ℝ := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableLT (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a < b) := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableLE (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a ≤ b) := by infer_instance
noncomputable instance decidableEq (a b : ℝ) : Decidable (a = b) := by infer_instance
/-- Show an underlying cauchy sequence for real numbers.
The representative chosen is the one passed in the VM to `Quot.mk`, so two cauchy sequences
converging to the same number may be printed differently.
-/
unsafe instance : Repr ℝ where
reprPrec r p := Repr.addAppParen ("Real.ofCauchy " ++ repr r.cauchy) p
theorem le_mk_of_forall_le {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} : (∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, x ≤ f j) → x ≤ mk f := by
intro h
induction x using Real.ind_mk
apply le_of_not_lt
rw [mk_lt]
rintro ⟨K, K0, hK⟩
obtain ⟨i, H⟩ := exists_forall_ge_and h (exists_forall_ge_and hK (f.cauchy₃ <| half_pos K0))
apply not_lt_of_le (H _ le_rfl).1
rw [← mk_const, mk_lt]
refine ⟨_, half_pos K0, i, fun j ij => ?_⟩
have := add_le_add (H _ ij).2.1 (le_of_lt (abs_lt.1 <| (H _ le_rfl).2.2 _ ij).1)
rwa [← sub_eq_add_neg, sub_self_div_two, sub_apply, sub_add_sub_cancel] at this
theorem mk_le_of_forall_le {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} {x : ℝ} (h : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, (f j : ℝ) ≤ x) :
mk f ≤ x := by
obtain ⟨i, H⟩ := h
rw [← neg_le_neg_iff, ← mk_neg]
exact le_mk_of_forall_le ⟨i, fun j ij => by simp [H _ ij]⟩
theorem mk_near_of_forall_near {f : CauSeq ℚ abs} {x : ℝ} {ε : ℝ}
(H : ∃ i, ∀ j ≥ i, |(f j : ℝ) - x| ≤ ε) : |mk f - x| ≤ ε :=
abs_sub_le_iff.2
⟨sub_le_iff_le_add'.2 <|
mk_le_of_forall_le <|
H.imp fun _ h j ij => sub_le_iff_le_add'.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 <| h j ij).1,
sub_le_comm.1 <|
le_mk_of_forall_le <| H.imp fun _ h j ij => sub_le_comm.1 (abs_sub_le_iff.1 <| h j ij).2⟩
lemma mul_add_one_le_add_one_pow {a : ℝ} (ha : 0 ≤ a) (b : ℕ) : a * b + 1 ≤ (a + 1) ^ b := by
rcases ha.eq_or_lt with rfl | ha'
· simp
clear ha
induction b generalizing a with
| zero => simp
| succ b hb =>
calc
a * ↑(b + 1) + 1 = (0 + 1) ^ b * a + (a * b + 1) := by
simp [mul_add, add_assoc, add_left_comm]
_ ≤ (a + 1) ^ b * a + (a + 1) ^ b := by
gcongr
· norm_num
· exact hb ha'
_ = (a + 1) ^ (b + 1) := by simp [pow_succ, mul_add]
end Real
/-- A function `f : R → ℝ` is power-multiplicative if for all `r ∈ R` and all positive `n ∈ ℕ`,
`f (r ^ n) = (f r) ^ n`. -/
def IsPowMul {R : Type*} [Pow R ℕ] (f : R → ℝ) :=
∀ (a : R) {n : ℕ}, 1 ≤ n → f (a ^ n) = f a ^ n
/-- A ring homomorphism `f : α →+* β` is bounded with respect to the functions `nα : α → ℝ` and
`nβ : β → ℝ` if there exists a positive constant `C` such that for all `x` in `α`,
`nβ (f x) ≤ C * nα x`. -/
def RingHom.IsBoundedWrt {α : Type*} [Ring α] {β : Type*} [Ring β] (nα : α → ℝ) (nβ : β → ℝ)
(f : α →+* β) : Prop :=
∃ C : ℝ, 0 < C ∧ ∀ x : α, nβ (f x) ≤ C * nα x
| Mathlib/Data/Real/Basic.lean | 619 | 623 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2017 Johannes Hölzl. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro, Floris van Doorn
-/
import Mathlib.Data.Countable.Small
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.BigOperators
import Mathlib.Data.Fintype.Powerset
import Mathlib.Data.Nat.Cast.Order.Basic
import Mathlib.Data.Set.Countable
import Mathlib.Logic.Equiv.Fin.Basic
import Mathlib.Logic.Small.Set
import Mathlib.Logic.UnivLE
import Mathlib.SetTheory.Cardinal.Order
/-!
# Basic results on cardinal numbers
We provide a collection of basic results on cardinal numbers, in particular focussing on
finite/countable/small types and sets.
## Main definitions
* `Cardinal.powerlt a b` or `a ^< b` is defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`.
## References
* <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cardinal_number>
## Tags
cardinal number, cardinal arithmetic, cardinal exponentiation, aleph,
Cantor's theorem, König's theorem, Konig's theorem
-/
assert_not_exists Field
open List (Vector)
open Function Order Set
noncomputable section
universe u v w v' w'
variable {α β : Type u}
namespace Cardinal
/-! ### Lifting cardinals to a higher universe -/
@[simp]
lemma mk_preimage_down {s : Set α} : #(ULift.down.{v} ⁻¹' s) = lift.{v} (#s) := by
rw [← mk_uLift, Cardinal.eq]
constructor
let f : ULift.down ⁻¹' s → ULift s := fun x ↦ ULift.up (restrictPreimage s ULift.down x)
have : Function.Bijective f :=
ULift.up_bijective.comp (restrictPreimage_bijective _ (ULift.down_bijective))
exact Equiv.ofBijective f this
-- `simp` can't figure out universe levels: normal form is `lift_mk_shrink'`.
theorem lift_mk_shrink (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{max u w} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.2 ⟨(equivShrink α).symm⟩
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink' (α : Type u) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = Cardinal.lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_shrink.{u, v, 0} α
@[simp]
theorem lift_mk_shrink'' (α : Type max u v) [Small.{v} α] :
Cardinal.lift.{u} #(Shrink.{v} α) = #α := by
rw [← lift_umax, lift_mk_shrink.{max u v, v, 0} α, ← lift_umax, lift_id]
theorem prod_eq_of_fintype {α : Type u} [h : Fintype α] (f : α → Cardinal.{v}) :
prod f = Cardinal.lift.{u} (∏ i, f i) := by
revert f
refine Fintype.induction_empty_option ?_ ?_ ?_ α (h_fintype := h)
· intro α β hβ e h f
letI := Fintype.ofEquiv β e.symm
rw [← e.prod_comp f, ← h]
exact mk_congr (e.piCongrLeft _).symm
· intro f
rw [Fintype.univ_pempty, Finset.prod_empty, lift_one, Cardinal.prod, mk_eq_one]
· intro α hα h f
rw [Cardinal.prod, mk_congr Equiv.piOptionEquivProd, mk_prod, lift_umax.{v, u}, mk_out, ←
Cardinal.prod, lift_prod, Fintype.prod_option, lift_mul, ← h fun a => f (some a)]
simp only [lift_id]
/-! ### Basic cardinals -/
theorem le_one_iff_subsingleton {α : Type u} : #α ≤ 1 ↔ Subsingleton α :=
⟨fun ⟨f⟩ => ⟨fun _ _ => f.injective (Subsingleton.elim _ _)⟩, fun ⟨h⟩ =>
⟨fun _ => ULift.up 0, fun _ _ _ => h _ _⟩⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton {s : Set α} : #s ≤ 1 ↔ s.Subsingleton :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.trans s.subsingleton_coe
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one⟩ := mk_le_one_iff_set_subsingleton
@[deprecated (since := "2024-11-10")]
alias _root_.Set.Subsingleton.cardinal_mk_le_one := Set.Subsingleton.cardinalMk_le_one
private theorem cast_succ (n : ℕ) : ((n + 1 : ℕ) : Cardinal.{u}) = n + 1 := by
change #(ULift.{u} _) = #(ULift.{u} _) + 1
rw [← mk_option]
simp
/-! ### Order properties -/
theorem one_lt_iff_nontrivial {α : Type u} : 1 < #α ↔ Nontrivial α := by
rw [← not_le, le_one_iff_subsingleton, ← not_nontrivial_iff_subsingleton, Classical.not_not]
lemma sInf_eq_zero_iff {s : Set Cardinal} : sInf s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ ∨ ∃ a ∈ s, a = 0 := by
refine ⟨fun h ↦ ?_, fun h ↦ ?_⟩
· rcases s.eq_empty_or_nonempty with rfl | hne
· exact Or.inl rfl
· exact Or.inr ⟨sInf s, csInf_mem hne, h⟩
· rcases h with rfl | ⟨a, ha, rfl⟩
· exact Cardinal.sInf_empty
· exact eq_bot_iff.2 (csInf_le' ha)
lemma iInf_eq_zero_iff {ι : Sort*} {f : ι → Cardinal} :
(⨅ i, f i) = 0 ↔ IsEmpty ι ∨ ∃ i, f i = 0 := by
simp [iInf, sInf_eq_zero_iff]
/-- A variant of `ciSup_of_empty` but with `0` on the RHS for convenience -/
protected theorem iSup_of_empty {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) [IsEmpty ι] : iSup f = 0 :=
ciSup_of_empty f
@[simp]
theorem lift_sInf (s : Set Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (sInf s) = sInf (lift.{u, v} '' s) := by
rcases eq_empty_or_nonempty s with (rfl | hs)
· simp
· exact lift_monotone.map_csInf hs
@[simp]
theorem lift_iInf {ι} (f : ι → Cardinal) : lift.{u, v} (iInf f) = ⨅ i, lift.{u, v} (f i) := by
unfold iInf
convert lift_sInf (range f)
simp_rw [← comp_apply (f := lift), range_comp]
end Cardinal
/-! ### Small sets of cardinals -/
namespace Cardinal
instance small_Iic (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iic a) := by
rw [← mk_out a]
apply @small_of_surjective (Set a.out) (Iic #a.out) _ fun x => ⟨#x, mk_set_le x⟩
rintro ⟨x, hx⟩
simpa using le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 hx
instance small_Iio (a : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Iio a) := small_subset Iio_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Icc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Icc a b) := small_subset Icc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ico (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ico a b) := small_subset Ico_subset_Iio_self
instance small_Ioc (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioc a b) := small_subset Ioc_subset_Iic_self
instance small_Ioo (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Small.{u} (Ioo a b) := small_subset Ioo_subset_Iio_self
/-- A set of cardinals is bounded above iff it's small, i.e. it corresponds to a usual ZFC set. -/
theorem bddAbove_iff_small {s : Set Cardinal.{u}} : BddAbove s ↔ Small.{u} s :=
⟨fun ⟨a, ha⟩ => @small_subset _ (Iic a) s (fun _ h => ha h) _, by
rintro ⟨ι, ⟨e⟩⟩
use sum.{u, u} fun x ↦ e.symm x
intro a ha
simpa using le_sum (fun x ↦ e.symm x) (e ⟨a, ha⟩)⟩
theorem bddAbove_of_small (s : Set Cardinal.{u}) [h : Small.{u} s] : BddAbove s :=
bddAbove_iff_small.2 h
theorem bddAbove_range {ι : Type*} [Small.{u} ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : BddAbove (Set.range f) :=
bddAbove_of_small _
theorem bddAbove_image (f : Cardinal.{u} → Cardinal.{max u v}) {s : Set Cardinal.{u}}
(hs : BddAbove s) : BddAbove (f '' s) := by
rw [bddAbove_iff_small] at hs ⊢
exact small_lift _
theorem bddAbove_range_comp {ι : Type u} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(g : Cardinal.{v} → Cardinal.{max v w}) : BddAbove (range (g ∘ f)) := by
rw [range_comp]
exact bddAbove_image g hf
/-- The type of cardinals in universe `u` is not `Small.{u}`. This is a version of the Burali-Forti
paradox. -/
theorem _root_.not_small_cardinal : ¬ Small.{u} Cardinal.{max u v} := by
intro h
have := small_lift.{_, v} Cardinal.{max u v}
rw [← small_univ_iff, ← bddAbove_iff_small] at this
exact not_bddAbove_univ this
instance uncountable : Uncountable Cardinal.{u} :=
Uncountable.of_not_small not_small_cardinal.{u}
/-! ### Bounds on suprema -/
theorem sum_le_iSup_lift {ι : Type u}
(f : ι → Cardinal.{max u v}) : sum f ≤ Cardinal.lift #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← (iSup f).lift_id, ← lift_umax, lift_umax.{max u v, u}, ← sum_const]
exact sum_le_sum _ _ (le_ciSup <| bddAbove_of_small _)
theorem sum_le_iSup {ι : Type u} (f : ι → Cardinal.{u}) : sum f ≤ #ι * iSup f := by
rw [← lift_id #ι]
exact sum_le_iSup_lift f
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_sSup {s : Set Cardinal} (hs : BddAbove s) :
lift.{u} (sSup s) = sSup (lift.{u} '' s) := by
apply ((le_csSup_iff' (bddAbove_image.{_,u} _ hs)).2 fun c hc => _).antisymm (csSup_le' _)
· intro c hc
by_contra h
obtain ⟨d, rfl⟩ := Cardinal.mem_range_lift_of_le (not_le.1 h).le
simp_rw [lift_le] at h hc
rw [csSup_le_iff' hs] at h
exact h fun a ha => lift_le.1 <| hc (mem_image_of_mem _ ha)
· rintro i ⟨j, hj, rfl⟩
exact lift_le.2 (le_csSup hs hj)
/-- The lift of a supremum is the supremum of the lifts. -/
theorem lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) :
lift.{u} (iSup f) = ⨆ i, lift.{u} (f i) := by
rw [iSup, iSup, lift_sSup hf, ← range_comp]
simp [Function.comp_def]
/-- To prove that the lift of a supremum is bounded by some cardinal `t`,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal is bounded by `t`. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} {t : Cardinal} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
(w : ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t) : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le' w
@[simp]
theorem lift_iSup_le_iff {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}} (hf : BddAbove (range f))
{t : Cardinal} : lift.{u} (iSup f) ≤ t ↔ ∀ i, lift.{u} (f i) ≤ t := by
rw [lift_iSup hf]
exact ciSup_le_iff' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,u} hf _)
/-- To prove an inequality between the lifts to a common universe of two different supremums,
it suffices to show that the lift of each cardinal from the smaller supremum
if bounded by the lift of some cardinal from the larger supremum.
-/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{w}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{w'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) {g : ι → ι'}
(h : ∀ i, lift.{w'} (f i) ≤ lift.{w} (f' (g i))) : lift.{w'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{w} (iSup f') := by
rw [lift_iSup hf, lift_iSup hf']
exact ciSup_mono' (bddAbove_range_comp.{_,_,w} hf' _) fun i => ⟨_, h i⟩
/-- A variant of `lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup` with universes specialized via `w = v` and `w' = v'`.
This is sometimes necessary to avoid universe unification issues. -/
theorem lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup' {ι : Type v} {ι' : Type v'} {f : ι → Cardinal.{v}}
{f' : ι' → Cardinal.{v'}} (hf : BddAbove (range f)) (hf' : BddAbove (range f')) (g : ι → ι')
(h : ∀ i, lift.{v'} (f i) ≤ lift.{v} (f' (g i))) : lift.{v'} (iSup f) ≤ lift.{v} (iSup f') :=
lift_iSup_le_lift_iSup hf hf' h
/-! ### Properties about the cast from `ℕ` -/
theorem mk_finset_of_fintype [Fintype α] : #(Finset α) = 2 ^ Fintype.card α := by
simp [Pow.pow]
@[norm_cast]
theorem nat_succ (n : ℕ) : (n.succ : Cardinal) = succ ↑n := by
rw [Nat.cast_succ]
refine (add_one_le_succ _).antisymm (succ_le_of_lt ?_)
rw [← Nat.cast_succ]
exact Nat.cast_lt.2 (Nat.lt_succ_self _)
lemma succ_natCast (n : ℕ) : Order.succ (n : Cardinal) = n + 1 := by
rw [← Cardinal.nat_succ]
norm_cast
lemma natCast_add_one_le_iff {n : ℕ} {c : Cardinal} : n + 1 ≤ c ↔ n < c := by
rw [← Order.succ_le_iff, Cardinal.succ_natCast]
lemma two_le_iff_one_lt {c : Cardinal} : 2 ≤ c ↔ 1 < c := by
convert natCast_add_one_le_iff
norm_cast
@[simp]
theorem succ_zero : succ (0 : Cardinal) = 1 := by norm_cast
-- This works generally to prove inequalities between numeric cardinals.
theorem one_lt_two : (1 : Cardinal) < 2 := by norm_cast
theorem exists_finset_le_card (α : Type*) (n : ℕ) (h : n ≤ #α) :
∃ s : Finset α, n ≤ s.card := by
obtain hα|hα := finite_or_infinite α
· let hα := Fintype.ofFinite α
use Finset.univ
simpa only [mk_fintype, Nat.cast_le] using h
· obtain ⟨s, hs⟩ := Infinite.exists_subset_card_eq α n
exact ⟨s, hs.ge⟩
theorem card_le_of {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} (H : ∀ s : Finset α, s.card ≤ n) : #α ≤ n := by
contrapose! H
apply exists_finset_le_card α (n+1)
simpa only [nat_succ, succ_le_iff] using H
theorem cantor' (a) {b : Cardinal} (hb : 1 < b) : a < b ^ a := by
rw [← succ_le_iff, (by norm_cast : succ (1 : Cardinal) = 2)] at hb
exact (cantor a).trans_le (power_le_power_right hb)
theorem one_le_iff_pos {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ 0 < c := by
rw [← succ_zero, succ_le_iff]
theorem one_le_iff_ne_zero {c : Cardinal} : 1 ≤ c ↔ c ≠ 0 := by
rw [one_le_iff_pos, pos_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem lt_one_iff_zero {c : Cardinal} : c < 1 ↔ c = 0 := by
simpa using lt_succ_bot_iff (a := c)
/-! ### Properties about `aleph0` -/
theorem nat_lt_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : (n : Cardinal.{u}) < ℵ₀ :=
succ_le_iff.1
(by
rw [← nat_succ, ← lift_mk_fin, aleph0, lift_mk_le.{u}]
exact ⟨⟨(↑), fun a b => Fin.ext⟩⟩)
@[simp]
theorem one_lt_aleph0 : 1 < ℵ₀ := by simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 1
@[simp]
theorem one_le_aleph0 : 1 ≤ ℵ₀ :=
one_lt_aleph0.le
theorem lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} : c < ℵ₀ ↔ ∃ n : ℕ, c = n :=
⟨fun h => by
rcases lt_lift_iff.1 h with ⟨c, h', rfl⟩
rcases le_mk_iff_exists_set.1 h'.1 with ⟨S, rfl⟩
suffices S.Finite by
lift S to Finset ℕ using this
simp
contrapose! h'
haveI := Infinite.to_subtype h'
exact ⟨Infinite.natEmbedding S⟩, fun ⟨_, e⟩ => e.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 _⟩
lemma succ_eq_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : Order.succ c = c + 1 := by
obtain ⟨n, hn⟩ := Cardinal.lt_aleph0.mp h
rw [hn, succ_natCast]
theorem aleph0_le {c : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ c ↔ ∀ n : ℕ, ↑n ≤ c :=
⟨fun h _ => (nat_lt_aleph0 _).le.trans h, fun h =>
le_of_not_lt fun hn => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 hn with ⟨n, rfl⟩
exact (Nat.lt_succ_self _).not_le (Nat.cast_le.1 (h (n + 1)))⟩
theorem isSuccPrelimit_aleph0 : IsSuccPrelimit ℵ₀ :=
isSuccPrelimit_of_succ_lt fun a ha => by
rcases lt_aleph0.1 ha with ⟨n, rfl⟩
rw [← nat_succ]
apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem isSuccLimit_aleph0 : IsSuccLimit ℵ₀ := by
rw [Cardinal.isSuccLimit_iff]
exact ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, isSuccPrelimit_aleph0⟩
lemma not_isSuccLimit_natCast : (n : ℕ) → ¬ IsSuccLimit (n : Cardinal.{u})
| 0, e => e.1 isMin_bot
| Nat.succ n, e => Order.not_isSuccPrelimit_succ _ (nat_succ n ▸ e.2)
theorem not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 {c : Cardinal} (h : c < ℵ₀) : ¬ IsSuccLimit c := by
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 h
exact not_isSuccLimit_natCast n
theorem aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit {c : Cardinal} (h : IsSuccLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c := by
contrapose! h
exact not_isSuccLimit_of_lt_aleph0 h
theorem isStrongLimit_aleph0 : IsStrongLimit ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨aleph0_ne_zero, fun x hx ↦ ?_⟩
obtain ⟨n, rfl⟩ := lt_aleph0.1 hx
exact_mod_cast nat_lt_aleph0 _
theorem IsStrongLimit.aleph0_le {c} (H : IsStrongLimit c) : ℵ₀ ≤ c :=
aleph0_le_of_isSuccLimit H.isSuccLimit
lemma exists_eq_natCast_of_iSup_eq {ι : Type u} [Nonempty ι] (f : ι → Cardinal.{v})
(hf : BddAbove (range f)) (n : ℕ) (h : ⨆ i, f i = n) : ∃ i, f i = n :=
exists_eq_of_iSup_eq_of_not_isSuccLimit.{u, v} f hf (not_isSuccLimit_natCast n) h
@[simp]
theorem range_natCast : range ((↑) : ℕ → Cardinal) = Iio ℵ₀ :=
ext fun x => by simp only [mem_Iio, mem_range, eq_comm, lt_aleph0]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ Nonempty (α ≃ Fin n) := by
rw [← lift_mk_fin, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_eq']
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_finite {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by
simp only [lt_aleph0, mk_eq_nat_iff, finite_iff_exists_equiv_fin]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_fintype {α : Type u} : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Nonempty (Fintype α) :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans (finite_iff_nonempty_fintype _)
theorem lt_aleph0_of_finite (α : Type u) [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.2 ‹_›
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite {S : Set α} : #S < ℵ₀ ↔ S.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_finite.trans finite_coe_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Finite.lt_aleph0⟩ := lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
@[simp]
theorem lt_aleph0_iff_subtype_finite {p : α → Prop} : #{ x // p x } < ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Finite :=
lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite
theorem mk_le_aleph0_iff : #α ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ Countable α := by
rw [countable_iff_nonempty_embedding, aleph0, ← lift_uzero #α, lift_mk_le']
@[simp]
theorem mk_le_aleph0 [Countable α] : #α ≤ ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0_iff.mpr ‹_›
theorem le_aleph0_iff_set_countable {s : Set α} : #s ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ s.Countable := mk_le_aleph0_iff
alias ⟨_, _root_.Set.Countable.le_aleph0⟩ := le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
@[simp]
theorem le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable {p : α → Prop} :
#{ x // p x } ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ { x | p x }.Countable :=
le_aleph0_iff_set_countable
theorem aleph0_lt_mk_iff : ℵ₀ < #α ↔ Uncountable α := by
rw [← not_le, ← not_countable_iff, not_iff_not, mk_le_aleph0_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_lt_mk [Uncountable α] : ℵ₀ < #α :=
aleph0_lt_mk_iff.mpr ‹_›
instance canLiftCardinalNat : CanLift Cardinal ℕ (↑) fun x => x < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun _ hx =>
let ⟨n, hn⟩ := lt_aleph0.mp hx
⟨n, hn.symm⟩⟩
theorem add_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a + b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_add]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem add_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a + b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨(self_le_add_right _ _).trans_lt h, (self_le_add_left _ _).trans_lt h⟩,
fun ⟨h1, h2⟩ => add_lt_aleph0 h1 h2⟩
theorem aleph0_le_add_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a + b ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b := by
simp only [← not_lt, add_lt_aleph0_iff, not_and_or]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero` if you already have `n ≠ 0`. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ n = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ := by
cases n with
| zero => simpa using nat_lt_aleph0 0
| succ n =>
simp only [Nat.succ_ne_zero, false_or]
induction' n with n ih
· simp
rw [succ_nsmul, add_lt_aleph0_iff, ih, and_self_iff]
/-- See also `Cardinal.nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff` for a hypothesis-free version. -/
theorem nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {n : ℕ} {a : Cardinal} (h : n ≠ 0) : n • a < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ :=
nsmul_lt_aleph0_iff.trans <| or_iff_right h
theorem mul_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a * b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [← Nat.cast_mul]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff {a b : Cardinal} : a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a = 0 ∨ b = 0 ∨ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by
refine ⟨fun h => ?_, ?_⟩
· by_cases ha : a = 0
· exact Or.inl ha
right
by_cases hb : b = 0
· exact Or.inl hb
right
rw [← Ne, ← one_le_iff_ne_zero] at ha hb
constructor
· rw [← mul_one a]
exact (mul_le_mul' le_rfl hb).trans_lt h
· rw [← one_mul b]
exact (mul_le_mul' ha le_rfl).trans_lt h
rintro (rfl | rfl | ⟨ha, hb⟩) <;> simp only [*, mul_lt_aleph0, aleph0_pos, zero_mul, mul_zero]
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff {a b : Cardinal} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ b ≠ 0 ∧ (ℵ₀ ≤ a ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ b) := by
let h := (@mul_lt_aleph0_iff a b).not
rwa [not_lt, not_or, not_or, not_and_or, not_lt, not_lt] at h
/-- See also `Cardinal.aleph0_le_mul_iff'`. -/
theorem aleph0_le_mul_iff' {a b : Cardinal.{u}} : ℵ₀ ≤ a * b ↔ a ≠ 0 ∧ ℵ₀ ≤ b ∨ ℵ₀ ≤ a ∧ b ≠ 0 := by
have : ∀ {a : Cardinal.{u}}, ℵ₀ ≤ a → a ≠ 0 := fun a => ne_bot_of_le_ne_bot aleph0_ne_zero a
simp only [aleph0_le_mul_iff, and_or_left, and_iff_right_of_imp this, @and_left_comm (a ≠ 0)]
simp only [and_comm, or_comm]
theorem mul_lt_aleph0_iff_of_ne_zero {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a * b < ℵ₀ ↔ a < ℵ₀ ∧ b < ℵ₀ := by simp [mul_lt_aleph0_iff, ha, hb]
theorem power_lt_aleph0 {a b : Cardinal} (ha : a < ℵ₀) (hb : b < ℵ₀) : a ^ b < ℵ₀ :=
match a, b, lt_aleph0.1 ha, lt_aleph0.1 hb with
| _, _, ⟨m, rfl⟩, ⟨n, rfl⟩ => by rw [power_natCast, ← Nat.cast_pow]; apply nat_lt_aleph0
theorem eq_one_iff_unique {α : Type*} : #α = 1 ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
calc
#α = 1 ↔ #α ≤ 1 ∧ 1 ≤ #α := le_antisymm_iff
_ ↔ Subsingleton α ∧ Nonempty α :=
le_one_iff_subsingleton.and (one_le_iff_ne_zero.trans mk_ne_zero_iff)
theorem infinite_iff {α : Type u} : Infinite α ↔ ℵ₀ ≤ #α := by
rw [← not_lt, lt_aleph0_iff_finite, not_finite_iff_infinite]
lemma aleph0_le_mk_iff : ℵ₀ ≤ #α ↔ Infinite α := infinite_iff.symm
lemma mk_lt_aleph0_iff : #α < ℵ₀ ↔ Finite α := by simp [← not_le, aleph0_le_mk_iff]
@[simp] lemma mk_lt_aleph0 [Finite α] : #α < ℵ₀ := mk_lt_aleph0_iff.2 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_le_mk (α : Type u) [Infinite α] : ℵ₀ ≤ #α :=
infinite_iff.1 ‹_›
@[simp]
theorem mk_eq_aleph0 (α : Type*) [Countable α] [Infinite α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
mk_le_aleph0.antisymm <| aleph0_le_mk _
theorem denumerable_iff {α : Type u} : Nonempty (Denumerable α) ↔ #α = ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun ⟨h⟩ => mk_congr ((@Denumerable.eqv α h).trans Equiv.ulift.symm), fun h => by
obtain ⟨f⟩ := Quotient.exact h
exact ⟨Denumerable.mk' <| f.trans Equiv.ulift⟩⟩
theorem mk_denumerable (α : Type u) [Denumerable α] : #α = ℵ₀ :=
denumerable_iff.1 ⟨‹_›⟩
theorem _root_.Set.countable_infinite_iff_nonempty_denumerable {α : Type*} {s : Set α} :
s.Countable ∧ s.Infinite ↔ Nonempty (Denumerable s) := by
rw [nonempty_denumerable_iff, ← Set.infinite_coe_iff, countable_coe_iff]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_aleph0 : ℵ₀ + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
theorem aleph0_mul_aleph0 : ℵ₀ * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable _
@[simp]
theorem nat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ↑n * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
le_antisymm (lift_mk_fin n ▸ mk_le_aleph0) <|
le_mul_of_one_le_left (zero_le _) <| by
rwa [← Nat.cast_one, Nat.cast_le, Nat.one_le_iff_ne_zero]
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_nat {n : ℕ} (hn : n ≠ 0) : ℵ₀ * n = ℵ₀ := by rw [mul_comm, nat_mul_aleph0 hn]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_mul_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) * ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_mul_aleph0 (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_mul_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ * ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_mul_nat (NeZero.ne n)
@[simp]
theorem add_le_aleph0 {c₁ c₂ : Cardinal} : c₁ + c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ c₁ ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ c₂ ≤ ℵ₀ :=
⟨fun h => ⟨le_self_add.trans h, le_add_self.trans h⟩, fun h =>
aleph0_add_aleph0 ▸ add_le_add h.1 h.2⟩
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_nat (n : ℕ) : ℵ₀ + n = ℵ₀ :=
(add_le_aleph0.2 ⟨le_rfl, (nat_lt_aleph0 n).le⟩).antisymm le_self_add
@[simp]
theorem nat_add_aleph0 (n : ℕ) : ↑n + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ := by rw [add_comm, aleph0_add_nat]
@[simp]
theorem ofNat_add_aleph0 {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ofNat(n) + ℵ₀ = ℵ₀ :=
nat_add_aleph0 n
@[simp]
theorem aleph0_add_ofNat {n : ℕ} [Nat.AtLeastTwo n] : ℵ₀ + ofNat(n) = ℵ₀ :=
aleph0_add_nat n
theorem exists_nat_eq_of_le_nat {c : Cardinal} {n : ℕ} (h : c ≤ n) : ∃ m, m ≤ n ∧ c = m := by
lift c to ℕ using h.trans_lt (nat_lt_aleph0 _)
exact ⟨c, mod_cast h, rfl⟩
theorem mk_int : #ℤ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℤ
theorem mk_pnat : #ℕ+ = ℵ₀ :=
mk_denumerable ℕ+
@[deprecated (since := "2025-04-27")]
alias mk_pNat := mk_pnat
/-! ### Cardinalities of basic sets and types -/
@[simp] theorem mk_additive : #(Additive α) = #α := rfl
@[simp] theorem mk_multiplicative : #(Multiplicative α) = #α := rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)] theorem mk_mulOpposite : #(MulOpposite α) = #α :=
mk_congr MulOpposite.opEquiv.symm
theorem mk_singleton {α : Type u} (x : α) : #({x} : Set α) = 1 :=
mk_eq_one _
@[simp]
theorem mk_vector (α : Type u) (n : ℕ) : #(List.Vector α n) = #α ^ n :=
(mk_congr (Equiv.vectorEquivFin α n)).trans <| by simp
theorem mk_list_eq_sum_pow (α : Type u) : #(List α) = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n :=
calc
#(List α) = #(Σn, List.Vector α n) := mk_congr (Equiv.sigmaFiberEquiv List.length).symm
_ = sum fun n : ℕ => #α ^ n := by simp
theorem mk_quot_le {α : Type u} {r : α → α → Prop} : #(Quot r) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective Quot.exists_rep
theorem mk_quotient_le {α : Type u} {s : Setoid α} : #(Quotient s) ≤ #α :=
mk_quot_le
theorem mk_subtype_le_of_subset {α : Type u} {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ ⦃x⦄, p x → q x) :
#(Subtype p) ≤ #(Subtype q) :=
⟨Embedding.subtypeMap (Embedding.refl α) h⟩
theorem mk_emptyCollection (α : Type u) : #(∅ : Set α) = 0 :=
mk_eq_zero _
theorem mk_emptyCollection_iff {α : Type u} {s : Set α} : #s = 0 ↔ s = ∅ := by
constructor
· intro h
rw [mk_eq_zero_iff] at h
exact eq_empty_iff_forall_not_mem.2 fun x hx => h.elim' ⟨x, hx⟩
· rintro rfl
exact mk_emptyCollection _
@[simp]
theorem mk_univ {α : Type u} : #(@univ α) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.univ α)
@[simp] lemma mk_setProd {α β : Type u} (s : Set α) (t : Set β) : #(s ×ˢ t) = #s * #t := by
rw [mul_def, mk_congr (Equiv.Set.prod ..)]
theorem mk_image_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} : #(f '' s) ≤ #s :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_image
lemma mk_image2_le {α β γ : Type u} {f : α → β → γ} {s : Set α} {t : Set β} :
#(image2 f s t) ≤ #s * #t := by
rw [← image_uncurry_prod, ← mk_setProd]
exact mk_image_le
theorem mk_image_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) ≤ lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_image⟩
theorem mk_range_le {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} : #(range f) ≤ #α :=
mk_le_of_surjective surjective_onto_range
theorem mk_range_le_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} :
lift.{u} #(range f) ≤ lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_le.{0}.mpr ⟨Embedding.ofSurjective _ surjective_onto_range⟩
theorem mk_range_eq (f : α → β) (h : Injective f) : #(range f) = #α :=
mk_congr (Equiv.ofInjective f h).symm
theorem mk_range_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{max u w} #(range f) = lift.{max v w} #α :=
lift_mk_eq.{v,u,w}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
theorem mk_range_eq_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(range f) = lift.{v} #α :=
lift_mk_eq'.mpr ⟨(Equiv.ofInjective f hf).symm⟩
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Injective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) := by
rw [← Cardinal.mk_range_eq_of_injective hf]
exact Cardinal.lift_le.2 (Cardinal.mk_set_le _)
lemma lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_surjective {α : Type u} {β : Type v} {f : α → β} (hf : Surjective f) :
Cardinal.lift.{u} (#β) ≤ Cardinal.lift.{v} (#α) :=
lift_mk_le_lift_mk_of_injective (injective_surjInv hf)
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn {α β : Type u} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : InjOn f s) :
#(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm
theorem mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α)
(h : InjOn f s) : lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
lift_mk_eq.{v, u, 0}.mpr ⟨(Equiv.Set.imageOfInjOn f s h).symm⟩
theorem mk_image_eq {α β : Type u} {f : α → β} {s : Set α} (hf : Injective f) : #(f '' s) = #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn _ _ hf.injOn
theorem mk_image_eq_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set α) (h : Injective f) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_of_injOn_lift _ _ h.injOn
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) :
lift.{u} #(f '' s) = lift.{v} #s :=
mk_image_eq_lift _ _ f.injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_image_embedding (f : α ↪ β) (s : Set α) : #(f '' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_image_embedding_lift f s
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α} : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) := mk_le_of_surjective (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α} :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_le_of_surjective <| ULift.up_surjective.comp (Set.sigmaToiUnion_surjective f)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk {α ι : Type u} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) : #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
#(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) := mk_congr (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_eq_sum_mk_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} {f : ι → Set α}
(h : Pairwise (Disjoint on f)) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = sum fun i => #(f i) :=
calc
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) = #(Σi, f i) :=
mk_congr <| .trans Equiv.ulift (Set.unionEqSigmaOfDisjoint h)
_ = sum fun i => #(f i) := mk_sigma _
theorem mk_iUnion_le {α ι : Type u} (f : ι → Set α) : #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ #ι * ⨆ i, #(f i) :=
mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk.trans (sum_le_iSup _)
theorem mk_iUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (f : ι → Set α) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ i, f i) ≤ lift.{u} #ι * ⨆ i, lift.{v} #(f i) := by
refine mk_iUnion_le_sum_mk_lift.trans <| Eq.trans_le ?_ (sum_le_iSup_lift _)
rw [← lift_sum, lift_id'.{_,u}]
theorem mk_sUnion_le {α : Type u} (A : Set (Set α)) : #(⋃₀ A) ≤ #A * ⨆ s : A, #s := by
rw [sUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le {ι α : Type u} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
#(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ #s * ⨆ x : s, #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le
theorem mk_biUnion_le_lift {α : Type u} {ι : Type v} (A : ι → Set α) (s : Set ι) :
lift.{v} #(⋃ x ∈ s, A x) ≤ lift.{u} #s * ⨆ x : s, lift.{v} #(A x.1) := by
rw [biUnion_eq_iUnion]
apply mk_iUnion_le_lift
theorem finset_card_lt_aleph0 (s : Finset α) : #(↑s : Set α) < ℵ₀ :=
lt_aleph0_of_finite _
theorem mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset {α} {s : Set α} {n : ℕ} :
#s = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = s ∧ t.card = n := by
constructor
· intro h
lift s to Finset α using lt_aleph0_iff_set_finite.1 (h.symm ▸ nat_lt_aleph0 n)
simpa using h
· rintro ⟨t, rfl, rfl⟩
exact mk_coe_finset
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_finset {n : ℕ} :
#α = n ↔ ∃ t : Finset α, (t : Set α) = univ ∧ t.card = n := by
rw [← mk_univ, mk_set_eq_nat_iff_finset]
theorem mk_eq_nat_iff_fintype {n : ℕ} : #α = n ↔ ∃ h : Fintype α, @Fintype.card α h = n := by
rw [mk_eq_nat_iff_finset]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, hn⟩
exact ⟨⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.1 ht⟩, hn⟩
· rintro ⟨⟨t, ht⟩, hn⟩
exact ⟨t, eq_univ_iff_forall.2 ht, hn⟩
theorem mk_union_add_mk_inter {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) + #(S ∩ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.unionSumInter S T⟩
/-- The cardinality of a union is at most the sum of the cardinalities
of the two sets. -/
theorem mk_union_le {α : Type u} (S T : Set α) : #(S ∪ T : Set α) ≤ #S + #T :=
@mk_union_add_mk_inter α S T ▸ self_le_add_right #(S ∪ T : Set α) #(S ∩ T : Set α)
theorem mk_union_of_disjoint {α : Type u} {S T : Set α} (H : Disjoint S T) :
#(S ∪ T : Set α) = #S + #T := by
classical
exact Quot.sound ⟨Equiv.Set.union H⟩
theorem mk_insert {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} (h : a ∉ s) :
#(insert a s : Set α) = #s + 1 := by
rw [← union_singleton, mk_union_of_disjoint, mk_singleton]
simpa
theorem mk_insert_le {α : Type u} {s : Set α} {a : α} : #(insert a s : Set α) ≤ #s + 1 := by
by_cases h : a ∈ s
· simp only [insert_eq_of_mem h, self_le_add_right]
· rw [mk_insert h]
theorem mk_sum_compl {α} (s : Set α) : #s + #(sᶜ : Set α) = #α := by
classical
exact mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sumCompl s)
theorem mk_le_mk_of_subset {α} {s t : Set α} (h : s ⊆ t) : #s ≤ #t :=
⟨Set.embeddingOfSubset s t h⟩
theorem mk_le_iff_forall_finset_subset_card_le {α : Type u} {n : ℕ} {t : Set α} :
#t ≤ n ↔ ∀ s : Finset α, (s : Set α) ⊆ t → s.card ≤ n := by
refine ⟨fun H s hs ↦ by simpa using (mk_le_mk_of_subset hs).trans H, fun H ↦ ?_⟩
apply card_le_of (fun s ↦ ?_)
classical
let u : Finset α := s.image Subtype.val
have : u.card = s.card := Finset.card_image_of_injOn Subtype.coe_injective.injOn
rw [← this]
apply H
simp only [u, Finset.coe_image, image_subset_iff, Subtype.coe_preimage_self, subset_univ]
theorem mk_subtype_mono {p q : α → Prop} (h : ∀ x, p x → q x) :
#{ x // p x } ≤ #{ x // q x } :=
⟨embeddingOfSubset _ _ h⟩
theorem le_mk_diff_add_mk (S T : Set α) : #S ≤ #(S \ T : Set α) + #T :=
(mk_le_mk_of_subset <| subset_diff_union _ _).trans <| mk_union_le _ _
theorem mk_diff_add_mk {S T : Set α} (h : T ⊆ S) : #(S \ T : Set α) + #T = #S := by
refine (mk_union_of_disjoint <| ?_).symm.trans <| by rw [diff_union_of_subset h]
exact disjoint_sdiff_self_left
theorem mk_union_le_aleph0 {α} {P Q : Set α} :
#(P ∪ Q : Set α) ≤ ℵ₀ ↔ #P ≤ ℵ₀ ∧ #Q ≤ ℵ₀ := by
simp only [le_aleph0_iff_subtype_countable, mem_union, setOf_mem_eq, Set.union_def,
← countable_union]
theorem mk_sep (s : Set α) (t : α → Prop) : #({ x ∈ s | t x } : Set α) = #{ x : s | t x.1 } :=
mk_congr (Equiv.Set.sep s t)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ lift.{u} #s := by
rw [lift_mk_le.{0}]
-- Porting note: Needed to insert `mem_preimage.mp` below
use Subtype.coind (fun x => f x.1) fun x => mem_preimage.mp x.2
apply Subtype.coind_injective; exact h.comp Subtype.val_injective
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{u} #s ≤ lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← image_preimage_eq_iff] at h
nth_rewrite 1 [← h]
apply mk_image_le_lift
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift {β : Type v} (f : α → β) (s : Set β)
(h : Injective f) (h2 : s ⊆ range f) : lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s :=
le_antisymm (mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h) (mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h2)
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f)
(h2 : s ⊆ range f) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
convert mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift.{u, u} f s h h2 using 1 <;> rw [lift_id]
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv_lift {β : Type v} (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) :
lift.{v} #(f ⁻¹' s) = lift.{u} #s := by
apply mk_preimage_of_injective_of_subset_range_lift _ _ f.injective
rw [f.range_eq_univ]
exact fun _ _ ↦ ⟨⟩
@[simp]
theorem mk_preimage_equiv (f : α ≃ β) (s : Set β) : #(f ⁻¹' s) = #s := by
simpa using mk_preimage_equiv_lift f s
theorem mk_preimage_of_injective (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : Injective f) :
#(f ⁻¹' s) ≤ #s := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_injective_lift f s h
theorem mk_preimage_of_subset_range (f : α → β) (s : Set β) (h : s ⊆ range f) :
#s ≤ #(f ⁻¹' s) := by
rw [← lift_id #(↑(f ⁻¹' s)), ← lift_id #(↑s)]
exact mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift f s h
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image_lift {α : Type u} {β : Type v} (f : α → β) {s : Set α}
{t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) : lift.{u} #t ≤ lift.{v} #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range_lift _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem mk_subset_ge_of_subset_image (f : α → β) {s : Set α} {t : Set β} (h : t ⊆ f '' s) :
#t ≤ #({ x ∈ s | f x ∈ t } : Set α) := by
rw [image_eq_range] at h
convert mk_preimage_of_subset_range _ _ h using 1
rw [mk_sep]
rfl
theorem le_mk_iff_exists_subset {c : Cardinal} {α : Type u} {s : Set α} :
c ≤ #s ↔ ∃ p : Set α, p ⊆ s ∧ #p = c := by
rw [le_mk_iff_exists_set, ← Subtype.exists_set_subtype]
apply exists_congr; intro t; rw [mk_image_eq]; apply Subtype.val_injective
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inl {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inl α β)) = lift.{v} #α := by
rw [← lift_id'.{u, v} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInl α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{u, v}]
@[simp]
theorem mk_range_inr {α : Type u} {β : Type v} : #(range (@Sum.inr α β)) = lift.{u} #β := by
rw [← lift_id'.{v, u} #_, (Equiv.Set.rangeInr α β).lift_cardinal_eq, lift_umax.{v, u}]
theorem two_le_iff : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y := by
rw [← Nat.cast_two, nat_succ, succ_le_iff, Nat.cast_one, one_lt_iff_nontrivial, nontrivial_iff]
theorem two_le_iff' (x : α) : (2 : Cardinal) ≤ #α ↔ ∃ y : α, y ≠ x := by
rw [two_le_iff, ← nontrivial_iff, nontrivial_iff_exists_ne x]
theorem mk_eq_two_iff : #α = 2 ↔ ∃ x y : α, x ≠ y ∧ ({x, y} : Set α) = univ := by
classical
simp only [← @Nat.cast_two Cardinal, mk_eq_nat_iff_finset, Finset.card_eq_two]
constructor
· rintro ⟨t, ht, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne, by simpa using ht⟩
· rintro ⟨x, y, hne, h⟩
exact ⟨{x, y}, by simpa using h, x, y, hne, rfl⟩
theorem mk_eq_two_iff' (x : α) : #α = 2 ↔ ∃! y, y ≠ x := by
rw [mk_eq_two_iff]; constructor
· rintro ⟨a, b, hne, h⟩
simp only [eq_univ_iff_forall, mem_insert_iff, mem_singleton_iff] at h
rcases h x with (rfl | rfl)
exacts [⟨b, hne.symm, fun z => (h z).resolve_left⟩, ⟨a, hne, fun z => (h z).resolve_right⟩]
· rintro ⟨y, hne, hy⟩
exact ⟨x, y, hne.symm, eq_univ_of_forall fun z => or_iff_not_imp_left.2 (hy z)⟩
theorem exists_not_mem_of_length_lt {α : Type*} (l : List α) (h : ↑l.length < #α) :
∃ z : α, z ∉ l := by
classical
contrapose! h
calc
#α = #(Set.univ : Set α) := mk_univ.symm
_ ≤ #l.toFinset := mk_le_mk_of_subset fun x _ => List.mem_toFinset.mpr (h x)
_ = l.toFinset.card := Cardinal.mk_coe_finset
_ ≤ l.length := Nat.cast_le.mpr (List.toFinset_card_le l)
theorem three_le {α : Type*} (h : 3 ≤ #α) (x : α) (y : α) : ∃ z : α, z ≠ x ∧ z ≠ y := by
have : ↑(3 : ℕ) ≤ #α := by simpa using h
have : ↑(2 : ℕ) < #α := by rwa [← succ_le_iff, ← Cardinal.nat_succ]
have := exists_not_mem_of_length_lt [x, y] this
simpa [not_or] using this
/-! ### `powerlt` operation -/
/-- The function `a ^< b`, defined as the supremum of `a ^ c` for `c < b`. -/
def powerlt (a b : Cardinal.{u}) : Cardinal.{u} :=
⨆ c : Iio b, a ^ (c : Cardinal)
@[inherit_doc]
infixl:80 " ^< " => powerlt
theorem le_powerlt {b c : Cardinal.{u}} (a) (h : c < b) : (a^c) ≤ a ^< b := by
refine le_ciSup (f := fun y : Iio b => a ^ (y : Cardinal)) ?_ ⟨c, h⟩
rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le {a b c : Cardinal.{u}} : a ^< b ≤ c ↔ ∀ x < b, a ^ x ≤ c := by
rw [powerlt, ciSup_le_iff']
· simp
· rw [← image_eq_range]
exact bddAbove_image.{u, u} _ bddAbove_Iio
theorem powerlt_le_powerlt_left {a b c : Cardinal} (h : b ≤ c) : a ^< b ≤ a ^< c :=
powerlt_le.2 fun _ hx => le_powerlt a <| hx.trans_le h
theorem powerlt_mono_left (a) : Monotone fun c => a ^< c := fun _ _ => powerlt_le_powerlt_left
theorem powerlt_succ {a b : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : a ^< succ b = a ^ b :=
(powerlt_le.2 fun _ h' => power_le_power_left h <| le_of_lt_succ h').antisymm <|
le_powerlt a (lt_succ b)
theorem powerlt_min {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< min b c = min (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_min
theorem powerlt_max {a b c : Cardinal} : a ^< max b c = max (a ^< b) (a ^< c) :=
(powerlt_mono_left a).map_max
theorem zero_powerlt {a : Cardinal} (h : a ≠ 0) : 0 ^< a = 1 := by
apply (powerlt_le.2 fun c _ => zero_power_le _).antisymm
rw [← power_zero]
exact le_powerlt 0 (pos_iff_ne_zero.2 h)
@[simp]
theorem powerlt_zero {a : Cardinal} : a ^< 0 = 0 := by
convert Cardinal.iSup_of_empty _
exact Subtype.isEmpty_of_false fun x => mem_Iio.not.mpr (Cardinal.zero_le x).not_lt
end Cardinal
| Mathlib/SetTheory/Cardinal/Basic.lean | 2,186 | 2,188 | |
/-
Copyright (c) 2014 Robert Y. Lewis. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Robert Y. Lewis, Leonardo de Moura, Johannes Hölzl, Mario Carneiro
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Field.Defs
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Commute
import Mathlib.Algebra.Ring.Invertible
import Mathlib.Order.Synonym
/-!
# Lemmas about division (semi)rings and (semi)fields
-/
open Function OrderDual Set
universe u
variable {K L : Type*}
section DivisionSemiring
variable [DivisionSemiring K] {a b c d : K}
theorem add_div (a b c : K) : (a + b) / c = a / c + b / c := by simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, add_mul]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c + b / c = (a + b) / c :=
(add_div _ _ _).symm
theorem same_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : (b + a) / b = 1 + a / b := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem div_add_same (h : b ≠ 0) : (a + b) / b = a / b + 1 := by rw [← div_self h, add_div]
theorem one_add_div (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 + a / b = (b + a) / b :=
(same_add_div h).symm
theorem div_add_one (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b + 1 = (a + b) / b :=
(div_add_same h).symm
/-- See `inv_add_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_add_inv' (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (a + b) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_add_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_add_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (a + b) * (1 / b) = 1 / a + 1 / b := by
simpa only [one_div] using (inv_add_inv' ha hb).symm
theorem add_div_eq_mul_add_div (a b : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a + b / c = (a * c + b) / c :=
(eq_div_iff_mul_eq hc).2 <| by rw [right_distrib, div_mul_cancel₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem add_div' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : b + a / c = (b * c + a) / c := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_cancel_right₀ _ hc]
@[field_simps]
theorem div_add' (a b c : K) (hc : c ≠ 0) : a / c + b = (a + b * c) / c := by
rwa [add_comm, add_div', add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.div_add_div (hbc : Commute b c) (hbd : Commute b d) (hb : b ≠ 0)
(hd : d ≠ 0) : a / b + c / d = (a * d + b * c) / (b * d) := by
rw [add_div, mul_div_mul_right _ b hd, hbc.eq, hbd.eq, mul_div_mul_right c d hb]
protected theorem Commute.one_div_add_one_div (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a + 1 / b = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [(Commute.one_right a).div_add_div hab ha hb, one_mul, mul_one, add_comm]
protected theorem Commute.inv_add_inv (hab : Commute a b) (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
a⁻¹ + b⁻¹ = (a + b) / (a * b) := by
rw [inv_eq_one_div, inv_eq_one_div, hab.one_div_add_one_div ha hb]
variable [NeZero (2 : K)]
@[simp] lemma add_self_div_two (a : K) : (a + a) / 2 = a := by
rw [← mul_two, mul_div_cancel_right₀ a two_ne_zero]
@[simp] lemma add_halves (a : K) : a / 2 + a / 2 = a := by rw [← add_div, add_self_div_two]
end DivisionSemiring
section DivisionRing
variable [DivisionRing K] {a b c d : K}
@[simp]
theorem div_neg_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : a / -a = -1 := by rw [div_neg_eq_neg_div, div_self h]
@[simp]
theorem neg_div_self {a : K} (h : a ≠ 0) : -a / a = -1 := by rw [neg_div, div_self h]
theorem div_sub_div_same (a b c : K) : a / c - b / c = (a - b) / c := by
rw [sub_eq_add_neg, ← neg_div, div_add_div_same, sub_eq_add_neg]
theorem same_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (b - a) / b = 1 - a / b := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same b a b).symm
theorem one_sub_div {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : 1 - a / b = (b - a) / b :=
(same_sub_div h).symm
theorem div_sub_same {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : (a - b) / b = a / b - 1 := by
simpa only [← @div_self _ _ b h] using (div_sub_div_same a b b).symm
theorem div_sub_one {a b : K} (h : b ≠ 0) : a / b - 1 = (a - b) / b :=
(div_sub_same h).symm
theorem sub_div (a b c : K) : (a - b) / c = a / c - b / c :=
(div_sub_div_same _ _ _).symm
/-- See `inv_sub_inv` for the more convenient version when `K` is commutative. -/
theorem inv_sub_inv' {a b : K} (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) : a⁻¹ - b⁻¹ = a⁻¹ * (b - a) * b⁻¹ :=
let _ := invertibleOfNonzero ha; let _ := invertibleOfNonzero hb; invOf_sub_invOf a b
theorem one_div_mul_sub_mul_one_div_eq_one_div_add_one_div (ha : a ≠ 0) (hb : b ≠ 0) :
1 / a * (b - a) * (1 / b) = 1 / a - 1 / b := by
| simpa only [one_div] using (inv_sub_inv' ha hb).symm
| Mathlib/Algebra/Field/Basic.lean | 117 | 118 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2022 David Kurniadi Angdinata. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: David Kurniadi Angdinata
-/
import Mathlib.Algebra.Polynomial.Splits
import Mathlib.Tactic.IntervalCases
/-!
# Cubics and discriminants
This file defines cubic polynomials over a semiring and their discriminants over a splitting field.
## Main definitions
* `Cubic`: the structure representing a cubic polynomial.
* `Cubic.disc`: the discriminant of a cubic polynomial.
## Main statements
* `Cubic.disc_ne_zero_iff_roots_nodup`: the cubic discriminant is not equal to zero if and only if
the cubic has no duplicate roots.
## References
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubic_equation
* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discriminant
## Tags
cubic, discriminant, polynomial, root
-/
noncomputable section
/-- The structure representing a cubic polynomial. -/
@[ext]
structure Cubic (R : Type*) where
/-- The degree-3 coefficient -/
a : R
/-- The degree-2 coefficient -/
b : R
/-- The degree-1 coefficient -/
c : R
/-- The degree-0 coefficient -/
d : R
namespace Cubic
open Polynomial
variable {R S F K : Type*}
instance [Inhabited R] : Inhabited (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨default, default, default, default⟩⟩
instance [Zero R] : Zero (Cubic R) :=
⟨⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩⟩
section Basic
variable {P Q : Cubic R} {a b c d a' b' c' d' : R} [Semiring R]
/-- Convert a cubic polynomial to a polynomial. -/
def toPoly (P : Cubic R) : R[X] :=
C P.a * X ^ 3 + C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d
theorem C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {w x y z : S} :
C w * (X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨w, w * -(x + y + z), w * (x * y + x * z + y * z), w * -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
simp only [toPoly, C_neg, C_add, C_mul]
ring1
theorem prod_X_sub_C_eq [CommRing S] {x y z : S} :
(X - C x) * (X - C y) * (X - C z) =
toPoly ⟨1, -(x + y + z), x * y + x * z + y * z, -(x * y * z)⟩ := by
rw [← one_mul <| X - C x, ← C_1, C_mul_prod_X_sub_C_eq, one_mul, one_mul, one_mul]
/-! ### Coefficients -/
section Coeff
private theorem coeffs : (∀ n > 3, P.toPoly.coeff n = 0) ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a ∧
P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c ∧ P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d := by
simp only [toPoly, coeff_add, coeff_C, coeff_C_mul_X, coeff_C_mul_X_pow]
norm_num
intro n hn
repeat' rw [if_neg]
any_goals omega
repeat' rw [zero_add]
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_zero {n : ℕ} (hn : 3 < n) : P.toPoly.coeff n = 0 :=
coeffs.1 n hn
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_a : P.toPoly.coeff 3 = P.a :=
coeffs.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_b : P.toPoly.coeff 2 = P.b :=
coeffs.2.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_c : P.toPoly.coeff 1 = P.c :=
coeffs.2.2.2.1
@[simp]
theorem coeff_eq_d : P.toPoly.coeff 0 = P.d :=
coeffs.2.2.2.2
theorem a_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.a = Q.a := by rw [← coeff_eq_a, h, coeff_eq_a]
theorem b_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.b = Q.b := by rw [← coeff_eq_b, h, coeff_eq_b]
theorem c_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.c = Q.c := by rw [← coeff_eq_c, h, coeff_eq_c]
theorem d_of_eq (h : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly) : P.d = Q.d := by rw [← coeff_eq_d, h, coeff_eq_d]
theorem toPoly_injective (P Q : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = Q.toPoly ↔ P = Q :=
⟨fun h ↦ Cubic.ext (a_of_eq h) (b_of_eq h) (c_of_eq h) (d_of_eq h), congr_arg toPoly⟩
theorem of_a_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.b * X ^ 2 + C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [toPoly, ha, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_a_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, b, c, d⟩ = C b * X ^ 2 + C c * X + C d :=
of_a_eq_zero rfl
theorem of_b_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.c * X + C P.d := by
rw [of_a_eq_zero ha, hb, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_b_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, c, d⟩ = C c * X + C d :=
of_b_eq_zero rfl rfl
theorem of_c_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) : P.toPoly = C P.d := by
rw [of_b_eq_zero ha hb, hc, C_0, zero_mul, zero_add]
theorem of_c_eq_zero' : toPoly ⟨0, 0, 0, d⟩ = C d :=
of_c_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl
theorem of_d_eq_zero (ha : P.a = 0) (hb : P.b = 0) (hc : P.c = 0) (hd : P.d = 0) :
P.toPoly = 0 := by
rw [of_c_eq_zero ha hb hc, hd, C_0]
theorem of_d_eq_zero' : (⟨0, 0, 0, 0⟩ : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero rfl rfl rfl rfl
theorem zero : (0 : Cubic R).toPoly = 0 :=
of_d_eq_zero'
theorem toPoly_eq_zero_iff (P : Cubic R) : P.toPoly = 0 ↔ P = 0 := by
rw [← zero, toPoly_injective]
private theorem ne_zero (h0 : P.a ≠ 0 ∨ P.b ≠ 0 ∨ P.c ≠ 0 ∨ P.d ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 := by
contrapose! h0
rw [(toPoly_eq_zero_iff P).mp h0]
exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl, rfl⟩
| theorem ne_zero_of_a_ne_zero (ha : P.a ≠ 0) : P.toPoly ≠ 0 :=
(or_imp.mp ne_zero).1 ha
| Mathlib/Algebra/CubicDiscriminant.lean | 161 | 163 |
/-
Copyright (c) 2021 Sébastien Gouëzel. All rights reserved.
Released under Apache 2.0 license as described in the file LICENSE.
Authors: Sébastien Gouëzel, Yaël Dillies
-/
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Bounded
import Mathlib.Analysis.Normed.Group.Uniform
import Mathlib.Topology.MetricSpace.Thickening
/-!
# Properties of pointwise addition of sets in normed groups
We explore the relationships between pointwise addition of sets in normed groups, and the norm.
Notably, we show that the sum of bounded sets remain bounded.
-/
open Metric Set Pointwise Topology
variable {E : Type*}
section SeminormedGroup
variable [SeminormedGroup E] {s t : Set E}
-- note: we can't use `LipschitzOnWith.isBounded_image2` here without adding `[IsIsometricSMul E E]`
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.mul (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s * t) := by
obtain ⟨Rs, hRs⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ s, ‖x‖ ≤ R := hs.exists_norm_le'
obtain ⟨Rt, hRt⟩ : ∃ R, ∀ x ∈ t, ‖x‖ ≤ R := ht.exists_norm_le'
refine isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le'.2 ⟨Rs + Rt, ?_⟩
rintro z ⟨x, hx, y, hy, rfl⟩
exact norm_mul_le_of_le' (hRs x hx) (hRt y hy)
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.of_mul (hst : IsBounded (s * t)) : IsBounded s ∨ IsBounded t :=
AntilipschitzWith.isBounded_of_image2_left _ (fun x => (isometry_mul_right x).antilipschitz) hst
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.inv : IsBounded s → IsBounded s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [isBounded_iff_forall_norm_le', ← image_inv_eq_inv, forall_mem_image, norm_inv']
exact id
@[to_additive]
theorem Bornology.IsBounded.div (hs : IsBounded s) (ht : IsBounded t) : IsBounded (s / t) :=
div_eq_mul_inv s t ▸ hs.mul ht.inv
end SeminormedGroup
section SeminormedCommGroup
variable [SeminormedCommGroup E] {δ : ℝ} {s : Set E} {x y : E}
section EMetric
open EMetric
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem infEdist_inv_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s⁻¹ = infEdist x s := by
rw [← image_inv_eq_inv, infEdist_image isometry_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem infEdist_inv (x : E) (s : Set E) : infEdist x⁻¹ s = infEdist x s⁻¹ := by
rw [← infEdist_inv_inv, inv_inv]
@[to_additive]
theorem ediam_mul_le (x y : Set E) : EMetric.diam (x * y) ≤ EMetric.diam x + EMetric.diam y :=
(LipschitzOnWith.ediam_image2_le (· * ·) _ _
(fun _ _ => (isometry_mul_right _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith) fun _ _ =>
(isometry_mul_left _).lipschitz.lipschitzOnWith).trans_eq <|
by simp only [ENNReal.coe_one, one_mul]
end EMetric
variable (δ s x y)
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_thickening : (thickening δ s)⁻¹ = thickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [thickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_cthickening : (cthickening δ s)⁻¹ = cthickening δ s⁻¹ := by
simp_rw [cthickening, ← infEdist_inv]
rfl
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_ball : (ball x δ)⁻¹ = ball x⁻¹ δ := (IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_ball x δ
@[to_additive (attr := simp)]
theorem inv_closedBall : (closedBall x δ)⁻¹ = closedBall x⁻¹ δ :=
(IsometryEquiv.inv E).preimage_closedBall x δ
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball : {x} * ball y δ = ball (x * y) δ := by
simp only [preimage_mul_ball, image_mul_left, singleton_mul, div_inv_eq_mul, mul_comm y x]
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball : {x} / ball y δ = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_ball, singleton_mul_ball]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_mul_singleton : ball x δ * {y} = ball (x * y) δ := by
rw [mul_comm, singleton_mul_ball, mul_comm y]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_div_singleton : ball x δ / {y} = ball (x / y) δ := by
simp_rw [div_eq_mul_inv, inv_singleton, ball_mul_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_mul_ball_one : {x} * ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by simp
@[to_additive]
theorem singleton_div_ball_one : {x} / ball 1 δ = ball x δ := by
rw [singleton_div_ball, div_one]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_mul_singleton : ball 1 δ * {x} = ball x δ := by simp [ball_mul_singleton]
@[to_additive]
theorem ball_one_div_singleton : ball 1 δ / {x} = ball x⁻¹ δ := by
rw [ball_div_singleton, one_div]
@[to_additive]
| theorem smul_ball_one : x • ball (1 : E) δ = ball x δ := by
rw [smul_ball, smul_eq_mul, mul_one]
| Mathlib/Analysis/Normed/Group/Pointwise.lean | 126 | 127 |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.